Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 3, 1996 C/C Minutes Meridian City Council September 3, 1996 Page 18 . Morrow: So the answer is basically he is asking for a second extension in order to do that he would have to have a variance. Crookston: That is correct. Come: Is that what, yours is a little different than that but I think it is the same thing as that is that correct? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council the ordinance reads that the Council can grant a single extension of up to one year. Morrow: And he has already had his first extension and now he is asking for a second one. So now we need to instruct him that he has to apply for a variance. Corrie: That is correct Morrow: Either that or file his plat prior to the November 5, 1996 date. Stiles: Correct Bentley: Mr. Mayor I would move that we deny Mr. Goldsmith's request for extension of Salmon Rapids No. 2 and inform him he would either have to file for a variance or complete the obligation to submit the plat before the closing date. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley, second by Mr. Rountree in reference of the request for final plat extension, discussion. l~",JROW: I have just a (inaudible) it seems it doesn't exp~~~ a until November 5, 1996 do we take this action now or November 5? Crookston: I don't think you take any action tonight other than deny the request. Corrie: I think that was the motion to deny the request. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #11: REQUEST FOR BEER AND WINE LICENSE FOR ALBERTSONS: ~ ! Meridian City Council September 3, 1996 Page 19 Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I have a question for Gary, did the sewer and water issues get settled out there? Smith: Kind of, I think we have an item on the agenda for tonight under Wayne's agenda to talk about those. Rountree: I have a question, it is my unfamiliarity with the ordinances. Is there a prohibition about selling alcoholic beverages that close to a religious institution in the City of Meridian or is it hard liquor? Gordon: It is by the drink. Crookston: There will however be a school, I am not sure if it is 300 feet or not. Rountree: It is considerably further than that unless they are building right on the front edge of that property. (Inaudible) Corrie: Any further questions of staff? Rountree: I just have a further question of the chief if he sees any reason to, we always ask for your advice on these? Gordon: (Inaudible) Morrow: Mr. Mayor, given the Chief s approval I would move we approve the beer and wine license for Albertson's Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma that the beer and wine license for Albertson's be approved, discussion? Berg: As far as part of the application is to give us a copy of the County and the State license for this and we have not received that. So I would like a condition on that motion if you see feet. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would subject the motion to include the receipt of the County and State documentation that Mr. Berg needs. Meridian City Council September 3, 1996 Page 20 Crookston: You would need to withdraw the initial motion and second. Corrie: I will entertain a motion to withdraw. Morrow: I will withdraw the motion. Tolsma: I wil{ withdraw the second. Corrie: You may now do the motion Mr. Morrow. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that approve the beer and wine license for Albertson's subject to the receipt of the necessary documentation from the County and the State. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma to approve the beer and wine license subject to receipt of County and State licenses, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING AND HOOK UP TO CITY SEWER BY ROBERT HALE: Corrie: Is Mr. Hale here tonight? Smith: Mr. Mayor, that name is Flaten, it looks like Hale on his letter. Crookston: Mr. Mayor, I don't know that he has requested an annexation and zoning at all, at least it has not been heard by Planning and Zoning. Smith: Mr. Mayor, may I comment, I talked to Mr. Flaten on the phone, from his fetter his predicament is that the drain field for the home that is existing out there in which I believe he said his parents live is within the developed area or to be developed are for Danbury No. 71 think the number is. Apparent~r they didn't realize it until they started doing some improvement work over there and got into it. So that is the reason for his request is to connect to the City sewer and water or at the very least the City sewer because of this septic tank drain field problem. He doesn't want to pay the double connection fee since he is in the County and the double connection is assessable to him by ordinance because he is in the County. He needs a quids fix I guess you would say for a sewer problem that exists. I don't know apparently they didn't know the location of the drain field, I can't be