Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 11-05 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5,1997 -7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROLL CALL: X WALT MORROW X GLENN BENTLEY X MAYOR ROBERT CORRIE MINUTES OF MEETING HELD OCTOBER 21, 1997: (APPROVED) X CHARLIE ROUNTREE X RON TOLSMA 1. TABLED OCTOBER 21,1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION: (TABLED UNTIL DECEMBER 2,1997) 2. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #760 - COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, COMMITTEES: (APPROVED WITH AMENDED SENTENCE IN SECTION 4-104) 3. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #761 - TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION: (APPROVED) 4. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #775 - VACATION OF GENTRY WAY: (APPROVED) 5. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #776 - BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: (APPROVED) 6. TABLED OCTOBER 21,1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR TURNBERRY SUBDIVISION BY BENCHMARK LAND CO.: (APPROVED) 7. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TURNBERRY SUBDIVISION BY BENCHMARK LAND CO.: (APPROVED) 8. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #779 - TREE ORDINANCE: (TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 18,1997) 9. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE REQUIREMENT TO TILE THE SAFFORD LATERAL BY GOLFVIEW ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: (CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW) 10. RESOLUTION #167 - WATER AVERAGING RESOLUTION: (APPROVED) 11. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ESPRESSO SHOP TO SELL PASTRIES, SANDWICHES, SOUP, ETC. BY SHARLA LANPHEAR - MERIDIAN OFFICE AND CONVENTION CENTER: (APPROVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; APPROVE DECISION) 12. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SETBACK REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW SECOND FLOOR TO EXTEND 3 % FEET INTO SETBACK BY SCOTT REECE - 2311 N. HYDE AVENUE: (CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW) 13. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 8.5 ACRES TO C-G AND R-2 BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: (APPROVE AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; APPROVE DECISION; CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE ANNEXATION ORDINANCE) 14. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ECONO LUBE SUBDIVISION BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: (TABLED TO NOVEMBER 18, 1997) 15. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ECONO LUBE N'TUNE AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHT REPAIR FACILITY AND SCHUCK'S AUTOMOBILE PARTS STORE BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: (TABLED TO NOVEMBER 18,1997) 16. RON VAN AUKER: DISCUSSION OF LAND TO EAST OF FUTURE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE: 17. FARM LAND LEASE WITH KENNETH ASCHENBRENNER: (APPROVED) 18. CANVASSING THE VOTES FOR CITY GENERAL ELECTION: (APPROVED) 19. WATERlSEWERlTRASH DELINQUENCIES: (APPROVED) 20. APPROVE BILLS: (APPROVED) 21. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: A. SHARI STILES, PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: 1. MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE - UPRR RIGHT OF WAY: 2. HUBCAP HEAVEN IN NAPA AUTO PARTS STORE: 3. WASHINGTON STREET DEDICATION TO CITY (ELVIRA SUBDIVISION): 4. HAM RADIO TOWERS: 5. GORDON HARRIS PROPERTY: B. GARY SMITH, CITY ENGINEER: 1. CLARIFIER ADDITION CHANGE ORDER: (APPROVED) C. WAYNE CROOKSTON, CITY ATTORNEY: 1. LETTER IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT FILED: D. WALT MORROW, CITY COUNCILMAN: 1. WATER AND SEWER LONG TERM PLAN: 2. CHERRY LANE FENCE LID: 3. OVERLAY OF EXISTING CITY HALL: E. GLENN BENTLEY, CITY COUNCILMAN: 1. STREET LIGHT CONCERNS: 2. $492 POLICE DEPARTMENT REFUNDlCREDIT: F. MAYOR CORRIE: 1. INSPECTORS CONTRACTS: 2. PARK IMPACT FEES COMMITTEE MEETING: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 5~ 1997 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Robert D. Corrie at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Walt Morrow, Charlie Rountree, Ron Tolsma, Glenn Bentley: OTHER PRESENT: Wayne Crookston, Will Berg, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Sharla Lanphear, Scott Reece, Patrick McKeegan, Dennis Thorton, Glen Buday, Joe Canning: MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD OCTOBER 21, 1997: Corrie: Are there any corrections or alterations to those minutes? I will entertain a motion they be approved as written. Rountree: So moved Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded the minutes of October 21, 1997 be approved as written, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #1: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ASHFORD GREENS SUBDIVISION BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION: Corrie: Mr. Morrow? Morrow: I think we just continue with that until we are finished with the (inaudible) irrigation ordinance by now but we are not. So the answer to the question Mr. Mayor is we have another strategic planning meeting November 25th we ought to move this to our first meeting in December which is the 2nd. So I will move to table to the 2nd. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to table item #1 until the December 2nd meeting, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #2: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #760 - COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, COMMITTEES: Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 2 Morrow: Mr. Mayor, we have in our packet the re-write of this particular ordinance. I have a question with respect to 4-104 on page 2a It seems to me that it is not very clear and I will read the paragraph. "The Mayor shall nominate persons who shall be confirmed by one half plus one vote of the City Council to serve as members of an entity. The person nominated by the member must be confirmed by the City Council by a majority votea If the Mayor fails to nominate an additional person within ten days after his previous nomination the City Council may select a person to serve the entities board by unanimous votea" It seems to me what sentence that has been left out there it should read something to the effect which basically comes right out of the State statute that if the Council refuses to confirm any nomination the Mayor shall then within ten days thereafter nominate another person to fill the office. He may continue to nominate until his nominee is confirmed. If the Mayor fails to nominate an additional person within ten days after his previous nomination the City Council may select a person to serve on the entities board by majority vote. It seems to me that we need to add a sentence in there to clarify what actions are going on. So I would offer that point as a suggestion. Rountree: As a point of discussion I agree that it should be added and I would hope that we could move forward on this tonight with that correction. Morrow: I agree with that, I have no problem with moving forward on that correction. Bentley: The only question I have got is we have got this listed by unanimous vote here , and you want it to be by majority vote. Morrow: Majority vote is one half plus one and it is consistent with everything else that is in the ordinances. Bentley: I realize that but you were referring to the State statute now is this unanimous vote a mis-print out of the state statute? Morrow: It is unanimous vote for this portion it is not part of the state statute. The unanimous vote that the state statute refers to is termination by Council of an appointive office. The state statute allows termination of appointed office by two methods. The Mayor can recommend a termination and the Council can by one half plus one verify that termination. Or the Council by its own activity by unanimous vote and effect a termination. Bentley: Was this just a copy mis-print on this unanimous deal or was there a purpose for that? While he is studying that I concur that we need to clean up the rest of that language. Crookston: I would have to look at the statute itself to make sure but I believe where the Mayor does not nominate a person then the person who the City Council nominates must be selected by unanimous vote. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 3 (..- Morrow I read the statute this evening in preparing my remarks there and it does not list a unanimous vote. Crookston: What statute did you look at Walt? Morrow: Basically it is the statute about confirmation of appointees. Bentley: Do we have a set of books here? Crookston: Yes we dOa Bentley: Can we table this for an instant and go onto the next item and let him go take a quick look and then maybe we can get all of this done. Corrie: If the Council agrees we will just hold item 2 and go to item 3. Morrow: So moved Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded we hold item 2 until the attorney checks the State statutes a MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #3: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #761 - TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION: Corrie: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REPEALING CHAPTER 2, TITLE 4 OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AND BY RE-ENACTING CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 4 OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION; WITH THE ADDITION OF THE MERIDIAN POLICE CHIEF TO THE COMMISSION AND MAKING OTHER MINOR CHANGES AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the audience that would like to have Ordinance #761 read in its entirety? Hearing none Council I will entertain a motion on Ordinance #761. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I move that the City Council adopt Ordinance #761 with suspension of rules. Rountree: Second ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 4 Corrie Motion made by Mr. Bentley, second by Mr. Rountree to adopt Ordinance #761 with the suspension of rules, Morrow: Mr. Mayor, point of clarification, Mr. Bentley did you motion include the latest revision of that dated November 5, 1997. Rountree: I withdraw my second Bentley: Let me clarify that Mr. Mayor, I move that the City of Meridian adopt Ordinance #761 dated November 5, 1997 revision with the suspension of rules. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley, second by Mr. Rountree to adopt Ordinance #761 with suspension of rules as received on November 5th date, any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow- Yea, Bentley - Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #4: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #775 - VACATION OF GENTRY WAY: Corrie: AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS GENTRY WAY AN EXISTING TEN FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTiliTY, DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION EASEMENT ADJACENT TO GENTRY WAY IN LOT 12 AND LOT 13, AMENDED MAGIC VIEW SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the audience that would like to have Ordinance #775 read in its entirety? Hearing none Council vvhat is your pleasure? Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I move the City of Meridian adopt Ordinance #775 with suspension of rules. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Councilman Bentley second by Councilman Tolsma to approve Ordinance #775 with suspension of rules, any further discussion? Roll call vote ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Bentley - Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 5 ( ITEM #2: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #760 - COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, COMMITTEES: Corrie: Discussion? Crookston: Mr. Mayor, the section is Section 50-205 it states that if the Mayor fails to make another nomination for the same office within ten days after the rejection of a nominee the City Council shall appoint a suitable person to fill the office during the term. The affirming vote of one half plus one of the members of the full Council shall be required to confirm any nomination made by the Mayor. That only talks about in the nomination by the Mayor. Corrie: That is in 205, is there anything in the Commissions, Boards and Committees I think it is 21 O? Crookston: That states all appointments to permanent boards, commissions or committees shall be made by the Mayor with the advice and the approval of the Council, that is all it says. Corrie: So Council it is your pleasure. Morrow: And I think our opinion from the Attorney General was that it was his opinion that the one half plus one except in the case where it is specified a unanimous vote would be the one that we ought to (inaudible). So my suggestion with respect to Ordinance #760 would be that we insert the phrase that was read making it coincide with the 50-205 and that we change the word unanimous to Majority on page 2, section 4-104. Corrie: Do I have a second to that motion? Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to insert the words following (inaudible) majority vote period in between there, "if the Mayor fails to nominate and also by majority vote or by unanimous vote, any further discussion? Roll call vote ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow- Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #5: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #776 - BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: Corrie: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO ADD A Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 6 NEW CHAPTER 4 TO BE KNOWN AS BUILDING AND PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENTS JOINT OPERATION PROVIDING THAT REVENUE AND FUNDING AND THE EXPENSE OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SHALL BE COMBINED SUCH THAT BOTH DEPARTMENTS ARE FUNDED BY THE SAME APPROPRIATION AND THE EXPENSES OF BOTH DEPARTMENTS ARE PAID FROM THE SAME BUDGET AND FUNDS; PROVIDING THAT THERE SHALL BE AN OPERATING FUND FOR BOTH DEPARTMENTS WITH THE RESERVE FUND ESTABLISHED TO ENABLE FUNDING OF THE TWO DEPARTMENTS IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT TAX REVENUES TO SUPPORT AND FUND BOTH DEPARTMENTS; PROVIDING THAT IF THERE ARE MORE REVENUES THEN EXPENSES FOR OPERATING AT THE DEPARTMENTS ACCOUNTS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND FUNDS REMAINING AFTER THE PAYMENT OF ALL NECESSARY EXPENSES OF THOSE TWO DEPARTMENTS MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ACCOUNTS CREATED AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Is there anyone from the audience that would like to have Ordinance No. 776 read in its entirety? Seeing none Council? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adopt Ordinance #776 with suspension of rules. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to adopt Ordinance #776 with the suspension of rules, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #6: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR TURNBERRY SUBDIVISION BY BENCHMARK LAND CO.: Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I believe that we need to have some discussions regarding this, I believe that the original table was to wait for confirmation of water flows and pipe sizing and interpretations with respect to what Nampa Meridian was giving us for information on what Briggs Engineering was giving us for their information and that Gary Smith was in charge of trying to bring all of that together and trying to make some sense out of it. I believe also there was an issue with a difference of opinion as to a number of minor inches involved~ It also appeared that there was an additional water going into the lateral at drainage points both from Nampa Meridian Sources and from Settlers. So having asked those questions Gary have you got prepared for us a presentation that we can discuss them? Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 7 Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, I had some information, unfortunately I just received it late this afternoon from John Anderson and it is verbal information that he gave to me in a meeting in my office about 3:30 or so. I can relate I think the contents of that meeting to you if you would like. Also I have spoken with Van Elg and Dean Briggs and Stan McHutchinson on a conference call today after my meeting with John Anderson. John Anderson has stated that the length of Safford lateral from the SE corner of this project to the NW corner of the project can be piped with a 48 inch diameter smooth wall interior pipe. He stated that pipe or a pipe smaller than that diameter would carry the flow in the ditch. He has told me he will provide a letter to the City of Meridian confirming that statement and also that Nampa Meridian would maintain the liability for the ditch for future flows in the ditch and that the pipe installed in the ditch would take the flows and that if there was any damage that it would be their responsibility, flooding damage that is. There is a question that the developer's engineer has raised during our telephone conversation today. Probably the biggest part of that question has to do with the location of the ditch along the west boundary of this property and a request from them for a .definition of our ordinance in terms of piping the ditch adjacent and I will paraphrase this adjacent and contiguous to the property being developed and just exactly what this means. According to the information provided to me over the phone by Briggs Engineering near the SW corner of the property the east bank of the ditch is near the property corner, the ditch itself is not on the property but the east bank of the ditch is. The SW corner of the property is on the edge of bank of the ditch at the SW corner. As you travel to the north the ditch veers slightly to the west and by the time you get to the NW corner reportedly the edge of bank is approximately 5 feet from the property corner. I told Briggs Engineering that I wasn't capable or able to make that judgement on what adjacent and contiguous means. If that is indeed adjacent and contiguous. Again I am paraphrasing I am not certain that is the exact language out of the piping ordinance, ditch piping ordinance. I told John Anderson today in my meeting that in order for us City staff and you as the City Council and Mayor to make decisions on these things we have to have definitive information from them, it is their facility. We have to have specifics in writing as to what they have and what they feel is appropriate on these ditches. To date we haven't received that unless we specifically ask for and generally it is after the fact. At least one meeting has taken place. We have to have that, I told him that we had to have it in order to make a decision. I don't think it is our place to ferret this thing out and determine in our own mind whether the ditches are pipable or not. We don't have the facilities to take elevations on the ditch banks, the high water marks in the field to determine that. This is a job that the irrigation district needs to do. They have a consulting engineer that is retained by them and they are capable of doing that kind of work and offering those sorts of things to us. It is really an issue to meet that needs to be decided between the district and the applicant the developer and the developer's representative. I would suspect that we would get involved in it as a mediator if that is the right word if the two parties can't resolve the issue. But again it is their facility, it is the irrigation district's facility. The matter of the ditches side ditches that are emptying into the Safford lateral John Anderson mentioned it briefly in his conversation with me~ According to Briggs Engineering staff he told them that those ditches were illegally discharging into the ,.- Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 8 Safford and that apparently once the ditch was piped they would have to make other arrangements to dispose of their tail water. There is according to information provided to me by Briggs Engineering there is a water take out point on the east side of Black Cat Road that is providing water to property that is either owned and or farmed by Janosek. The ditch crosses under Black Cat Road after take out, parallels the north side of the Safford lateral until you get to the SW corner of the property and then crosses the Safford in a pipe to a ditch that would irrigate Janosek's property. Briggs Engineering asked John Anderson if they could put that keep that water in the Safford, take it out at the SW corner where it ultimately comes out and eliminate the need to pipe that ditch separately for Janosek. According to Briggs Engineering they were told that they could do that as long as that water did not influence the piping of the Safford lateral. IN other words right now it is taken out at that point, it is in a separate ditch. Put it back in the Safford at that point it is going to add water to the Safford that it doesn't presently have. If that kicked it up above the carrying capacity of a 48 inch pipe then they wouldn't allow it and there would have to be a separate pipe installed across this property to provide water to Janosek. Morrow: Mr. Mayor may I ask a technical question there? Gary if that is coming out of the Safford lateral at the northern edge is it a continuous flowing ditch all season long so that the water is never back in the Safford or is it water that is taken from the Safford when Mr. Janosek is irrigating and then goes back into the Safford when he not irrigating? Smith: I don't know the answer to that. Morrow: So Nampa Meridian hasn't provided us with that information either? Smith: No, and that information wasn't provided to me by John Anderson, Briggs Engineering provided that in my conversation with them this afternoon. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, Gary did I hear you right did you say that Mr. Anderson said if the other ditches were dumping their water into the Safford that they would not allow it? Smith: That is what I understood from Briggs Engineering in their conversation with him. Bentley: When they made their water analysis as to how many inches were in there were they counting the water that is currently flowing in that ditch with this additional water being added in from the other ditches? Smith: The only quantity of water that has ever been offered to me is 3000 minor inches on paper. According to John Anderson that was a number given by him to Briggs Engineering answering a question from them how much water is in the Safford. They were told 3000 minor inches. Meridian City Council November Sf 1997 Page 9 Bentley: The reason I am asking this question, if they are taking a reading on the water that is in there with this additional water in there also if they disallow the additional water out then the water that Mr. Janosek needs might off set what they are taking off to where they wouldn't have to tile a separate ditch alone for Mr. Janosek is what I was getting at. Smith; I don't know where the reading for the water is taken, if it is, I know there is a weir at the Eight Mile Lateral after it crosses Cherry lane Road and I think that is the origin or that is the head of the Safford. So they can measure the water at that point. I don't know what take outs there are between there and this property. I understand what you are saying and I don't know how much water is coming in from as tail water from those other ditches. But that is a possibility yes. I don't know where those points are either along the length of the ditch, if they are on the west sidef totally on the west side or if there are some on the south side I don't know. Tolsma: That small ditch that is feeding back into the Safford Lateral that would be classified as a waste ditch then? Smith: Yes Tolsma: So instead of putting that into the drain ditches they are running it back into the Safford Lateral again. I think maybe I didn't understand Walt or Glenn's question but was that water in that ditch originally come from the head of the weir they were using for irrigation? Smith: I don't know, alii understand is that there is some Settler's water reportedly there is some Settlers water that dumps into the ditch and other water and I don't know where it comes from. Tolsma: So that water in the ditch then might be Settlers water running into Nampa Meridian's ditch then. Smith: That is what I am being told. Tolsma: Didn't we have that problem out here off of Summerfield when they put in that pressurized irrigation system they were using Settlers water and putting that back into Nampa Meridian's Irrigation ditch. Smith: I apologize to you that I don't have anything in formal written form. All I have is a verbal conversation with John Anderson today and his comment that piping that ditch can be done with a 48 inch diameter pipe or less. That is a smooth inside wall pipe and he is talking about concrete pipe at this point. Tolsma: Did you ask him about corrugated metal pipe on a large pipe or something like that if it would require a bigger size pipe because (inaudible) Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 1 0 Smith: Well they will allow corrugated pipe it has to be 10 gage apparently and it would require a larger pipe. Tolsma: Would that be cost effective to go a larger pipe on a corrugated metal pipe? Smith: I don't know, I can't tell you Councilman Tolsma I really don't know, possibly it could be. I think one of the issues right now in my mind anyway I am pretty well convinced if the only length of ditch to be piped here is the ditch along the south boundary which is inside the property line as opposed to piping the entire length of the ditch then a 48 inch diameter pipe will not carry the water because there isn't enough drop in the head across the south boundary of the property. It is too flat, turn the corner form the SW corner and head north and reportedly it is about 5 foot of head from the SE corner from the NW corner. Now that is a report from John Anderson and that is a result of him and one of his cohorts taking some rough grade elevations in the field with the statement that we aren't surveyors so it might not be real close. Really when you are doing this sort of thing you are not taking elevations on the invert of the ditch. You are dealing with high water elevations on the ditch banks. That is your true elevation difference in your hits. I doubt they were using that I think they were using the invert of the ditch. Tolsma: Wasn't there 2 or three structures in that ditch in the path of that to slow the water down because of the fall. There is one structure in the ditch about 250 feet south of the northwest corner. It is a restriction width wise I guess there is not much of a restriction height wise. But according to John Anderson that was being utilized as a velocity restricter* Briggs Engineering feels that at one point in time in the past it was used as a check structure for a take out of water, I don't know I haven't seen it I haven't looked at it. But that is the only structure reportedly that is in the ditch* Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I think part of what we are dealing with here is in our Irrigation committee and our irrigation ordinance that we are working with currently it has been alluded to that it is the City that empowering Nampa Meridian to do the various things that they are doing* Here is clearly a case and Mr. Smith makes a good point we are not, it is our ordinance that creates the issue about piping or not piping. We don't have the resources to research this. Either we get the research this so that we don't go, this thing can go back and forth literally for months now. Nampa Meridian is not in any way shape or form providing us with valid information that we need to be able to make decisions or that our staff needs to make decisions. We ain't surveyors just doesn1t quite cut it in terms of decision making. From the council standpoint I guess it seems to me that it would make a lot of sense here for us not to adopt these findings of fact requiring the piping of the ditch. I don't see any testimony or any information from Nampa Meridian that clearly says that the ditch works to ignore discharge water that historically may have been going into that ditch and there is no other alternate place to put at this juncture creates yet other problems and so far no one has addressed that It seems to me that Nampa Meridian has had more than adequate time some 30 days or Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 11 more to address the issue in writing as we requested which was the cause for the initial tabling as I recall from the findings of fact and conclusions here so that we can get this thing ironed out in writing and licensed people making the calculations available to our staff to make the determination (inaudible). So at this juncture it doesn't seem to me any of that has been done. Based on what Gary is telling us that there are as many or more valid questions today then there was the first part of October when this issue came before us. I guess from perspective at this point I would be ready to move ahead with findings of fact and conclusions that did not require the piping of the ditch and send Nampa Meridian the signal that they need to shape up and provide us with accurate information in a timely manner if in fact we are going to do this piping or run the risk of not having the piping done. Tolsma: Wayne, are we establishing a precedent here by not requiring the piping of the ditch that Nampa Meridian says is capable of being piped, a 48 inch pipe because of all the other developers we have required to pipe the ditches that Nampa Meridian says 48 inch pipe will carry. If we allow this here are we going to be in trouble? Crookston: Under our ordinance each variance is assessed on the facts that are given. So there is no precedent set. But certainly when it becomes well known that this is what has been done people are going to mention it that is for sure. It is best in my mind it is best to have a standard upon which you can rely on and make it applicable to every in this case every water way that there is. But that is totally a Council decision. Tolsma: But if Nampa Meridian said that a 48 inch pipe will carry this water and they assume all responsibilities for it and we don't require the pipe then where are we at down the road? Crookston: Well as I said there is no in our ordinance it sets forth that there is no if you will precedent setting by any decision on a variancea So I don't think that we are setting anything but as I said it is a very difficult problem because people are going to know what we have done and they are going to argue that we have set a precedent. Are ordinance states that we do not set precedents in granting a variance. Rountree: I guess to Ron's point my recollection of what we have varied in the past has been a situation where there has not necessarily been a disagreement about the engineering. The applicant as well as Nampa Meridian agreed that a pipe size could handle the water. In this case we have a professional engineering study stamped by professional engineer saying it won't and we have Nampa Meridian Irrigation District with we ain't surveyors and we have nothing in record from them even committing to that. I would go back to the record I guess last meeting my question was how long do we hold this for Nampa Meridian. Walt's response was only to the 5th. My response is if we don't receive anything by the 5th it is no longer pending and Walt's comment was that is correct we take action on the 5th. I am ready to take action, I don't think we need to have Nampa Meridian hold us up anymore. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 12 Morrow: I think to editorialize on that a little bit more basically what Nampa Meridian (inaudible) and that is bologna. They can either confirm with what it is we need from them or we will move on without them. Corrie: Any further discussion? I don't think I have a tie breaker here. I had a question I was going to ask you Gary but I will wait if there is a tie breaker. Morrow: Go ahead and ask I want to hear your opinion. Corrie: My question was did I hear you correctly to say that on the Benchmark Land the subdivision that a 48 inch pipe would not carry the flow because of the slope of the land and the angle is that correct? Smith: Along the south boundary. One other comment I might make, I believe and maybe Wayne's memory is better than mine on Waterbury Subdivision and the Creason Lateral the irrigation district requested that be piped and the engineering calculation showed that from the applicant's engineer that a 48 inch pipe wouldn't handle the water. So Council did not require that to be piped? Crookston: That is correct Gary, on Waterbury that is what happened. But again one variance as far as the City Council one variance is not precedent setting for another variance. They have to be undertaken on the facts of the particular case. Corrie: Any further discussion? I guess we need a motion for new findings of fact. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we amend the findings of fact and conclusions that we have before us tonight to reflect the variance for piping of the ditch is granted in conjunction with the other conditions in terms of the variance with respect to block length and all other things being left as written in the findings of fact and conclusions. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Rountree to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law to approve the variances for both the piping of the Safford lateral in Turnberry Subdivision as wen as for the block lengths and the minimum requirements for the lot frontage requirements, any further discussion? Roll call vote ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Tolsma - Yea, Rountree - Yea, Bentley - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move for the decision, that it is decided that the variance for a block length of greater than the maximum or less than the minimum requirements and a variance of the lot frontage requirements in Turnberry Subdivision is granted. Said approval is conditioned upon the submittal of information listing the exact lots and Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 13 blocks from which the variance is requested to Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator and Gary Smith the City Engineer for approval. It is further decided that the variance for the piping of the Safford Lateral in Turnberry Subdivision is approved. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded on the decision as read, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #7: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TURNBERRY SUBDIVISION BY BENCHMARK LAND CO. Corrie: At this time I would like to have the representative from Turnberry Subdivision (End of Tape) Elg: (Inaudible) the preliminary plat was tabled or the hearing was closed on October 7th as mentioned and the findings of fact were prepared and presented on October 21. Are there any specific questions that you have about that preliminary plat that we still need to address. I can answer any questions to that Corrie: Council, your pleasure? Morrow Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the preliminary plat for Turnberry Subdivision by Benchmark Land Co. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Tolsma to approve the preliminary plat for Turnberry Subdivision, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #8: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #779 - TREE ORDINANCE: Corrie: We still have some work to do on that one, so I would entertain a motion that be tabled. Morrow: So moved Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we table item #8 the Tree Ordinance #779 until our next meeting, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 14 MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #9: TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE REQUIREMENT TO TILE THE SAFFORD LATERAL BY GOLFVIEW ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: Morrow: Mr. Mayor, Gary can you bring us up to speed on the Golfview, it appears that we have from EHM Engineering some figures here that were not available to us at time of our last meeting. Can you review those for us? Smith: Yes sir, Mr. Mayor and Council members, Councilman Morrow, I did receive those calculations from EHM and also talked to John Anderson at Nampa Meridian and he concurs that length of ditch cannot be piped with a 48 inch diameter pipe, verbally he concurs. Hepworth: I can provide written confirmation of that as well if you need that so that it is not (inaudible) Corrie: Council, technically speaking this is after the fact here. I think if we want it as part of the record, I don't think we need it but I appreciate the information. (Inaudible) Corrie: Thank you for that, sorry for the confusion I just wanted to make sure we are not going to get back lashed on this. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the variance to the requirement to tile the Safford Lateral submitted to us by Golfview Association limited partnership and instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact and conclusions to that end. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we direct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of law, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #10: RESOLUTION #167 - WATER AVERAGING RESOLUTION: Corrie: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CHANGING THE BEGINNING OF THE AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL WATER USE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 15, 1997 TO NOVEMBER 15, 1997 FOR PURPOSES OF ASSESSING SEWER USER CHARGES AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 15 DATE. Is there anyone from the audience that would like to have Resolution #167 read in its entirety? Council, what is your pleasure? Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adopt Resolution #167 as written. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we adopt Resolution #167 as written, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow- Yea, Bentley - Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: For those in the audience what this means is sometimes it is a little hotter in October than we anticipate so that we are watering on the lawns in October and we don't want you to have to pay for the water that is going down the sewer and really not. So we back it up and it makes it an advantage to the people. ITEM #11: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ESPRESSO SHOP TO SELL PASTRIES, SANDWICHES, SOUP, ETC. BY SHARLA LANPHEAR - MERIDIAN OFFICE AND CONVENTION CENTER: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite you to come up and give us some information on your conditional use permit. Sharla Lanphear 13 W. Rockford Street, Meridian, was sworn by the City Attorney. Lanphear: I am requesting this conditional use permit and it is to be in the Meridian Office and Convention Center and I have submitted this in the beginning of October, this would be the second public hearing for me for this. I am just here to answer any specific questions. Tolsma: I was just wondering where the samples were? Morrow: Are you going to have cinnamon rolls with raisins? Lanphear: Yes Morrow: Good Corrie: Any further questions from the Council? Sharla, thank you very much, anyone else from the public that wishes to issue testimony on this at this time? Hearing none I will close the public hearing, Council any further questions. { - ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 16 Bentley: I have a question for Shari, since you are moving into that building does this meet with your approval? Stiles: Yes, it will be our breakroom. Corrie: Any further questions? I will entertain a motion for the request for conditional use permit. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions as prepared for us by P & z. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded we approve the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared by Planning and Zoning Commission, roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow - Yea, Bentley -Yea, Rountree -Yea, Tolsma - Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: I will entertain a motion for the decision. Morrow: Mr. Mayor the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby approves the conditional use permit requested by the applicant for the property described in the application with the conditions set forth in the findings of fact and conclusions of law or similar conditions as found justified and appropriate by the City Council. That the property be required to meet the water and sewer requirements, the fire and life safety codes, uniform fire code, parking requirements, landscape requirements, and all ordinances of the City of Meridian. The conditional use should be subject to review upon notice to the applicant by the City. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Morrow, second by Mr. Bentley on the decision as read, any further discussion? Hearing none all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #12: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW SECOND FLOOR TO EXTEND 3 % FEET INTO SETBACK BY SCOTT REECE - 2311 N. HYDE AVENUE: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite a representative to come forward. Scott Reece, 7240 Latigo, Nampa, was sworn by the City Attorney. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 17 Reece: As I stated my name is Scott Reece, this is a request for a variance for a structure, single dwelling home that has been built on 2311 N. Hyde where the second floor cantilever extends 3 feet into the setback. I am available to answer any questions. Corrie: Council any questions? Thank you Scott, is there anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony on this variance request? Hearing none Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I have a question with respect to clarification that maybe Ms. Stiles or Mr. Smith can answer. Generally setbacks are exclusive of eaves and porches and overhangs, is Stiles: Mr. Morrow, this variance request Daunt Whitman was the one that told them they need to get it because it did not meet the setback requirements. Morrow: My question is a technical one in nature. Most communities that I am familiar with setbacks are determined by a foundation the setbacks are exclusive to foundations, eaves, porches and overhangs are not considered and bay windows without foundation or not considered or held to be an encroachment within the setback. So I am asking tonight if we as a City of Meridian are out of step with the rest of the communities of the Treasure Valley. Reece: This specific structure has been built in three different locations throughout the Boise Valley. The City of Meridian is the first time I have ever been requested to apply for a variance for the cantilever based on the same thing. We have always gone to the foundation and we have done 2 foot overhangs or 2 foot encroachments without any problems before. This was put in at the request as was stated by the City inspector. So again I would also appreciate a clarification. Morrow: I guess Mr. Mayor for sake of clarification that maybe we as a Council make a decision of whether to approve the variance or not approve it but also in the same line we should give direction to our staff of what our definition of setback is. Clearly in this case it is my understanding by the map that this is an overhang over a driveway above a garage. Which also (inaudible) Rountree: It is out the side (inaudible) Reece: This is a cantilever on the second floor. This particular structure is a tri-Ievel and this is the two story section (Inaudible). The structure immediately to the left is the main body which is main floor and the structure to the left of that (inaudible) Morrow: So it is a side entry garage and (inaudible) Reece: Correct it is a side entry garage. Meridian City Council November 5f 1997 Page 18 Morrow: My point has been clarified then thank you. I guess that if there is no further discussion and you are willing to close the public hearing Corrie: Any further discussion? I will close the public hearing. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I would move that we instruct the City Attorney to prepare findings of fact and conclusions of faw for the variance to the setback requirement and showing that we are favorable to the variance for the setback. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to request the City Attorney draw up findings of fact and conclusions of law with the statement, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would request from City Attorney now an opinion as to how our ordinance is structured that has created this discussion. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council there is a section of our ordinance about architectural projections. It says open structures such as porches, canopies, balconies, platforms, carports, covered patios, chimney, and similar architectural projections shall be considered parts of the building to which it is attached and shall not project into the required minimum front side or rear side yard. So that is probably what he is basing that on. Morrow: I think that if that is the case then what we need to do is we need to prepare an amendment to the ordinance and correct the ordinance to reflect foundation. Crookston: In response to your question you can have any size of overhang because the way you are viewing it that there is no foundation for it then you can have it overhang ten feet. That is the basis for what is in our ordinance. Morrow: Clearly the answer to your question is yes that is technically possible but from the point of custom and usage and consistency with the rest of the valley that is not what is done within the homebuilding business. So either we are in step or we convince the rest of the valley to change so we have some consistency here. Crookston: I have no problem with that but I think that we should have it worded such that any overhang or whatever we are talking about cannot exceed more than X number of feet beyond the foundation. So if you want to put it ten feet then put ten feet if you want it at 3 feet then put it at 3 feet, but that is why it is in the ordinance the way it is. Smith: Mr. Mayor, just an observation, I guess it doesn't present a real critical concern on the front yard or even the back yard but on the side yard it sure could where we are Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 19 limited to five feet. If you had a 3 foot overhang on a 5 foot setback that means on your second story you have got 2 feet from the side of your projection to your property line or your fence. Even though it is a second story in this case and I guess it would be in any case you could sure cause concern or havoc with that side yard setback. Rountree: I believe our side yard setback says there is five feet for each story. Smith: Right, but even on a single story if you project it out and you cantilever out off your foundation three feet for some kind of a projection you can still wipe out your side yard setback. Corrie: If your neighbor did the same thing you could really have some trouble with the fire department. Smith: That would need to be taken into consideration and again I don't think it is a concern on the front and the rear yard particularly. Crookston: If I might suggest in any event we need to get in step with the valley we don't need to be pioneers and have an ordinance that clearly is not applicable anyplace else and to some extent we may be looking here at real unusual circumstances that Mr. Smith Brings up. My own personal experience is that it is not unusual at all to have window outcroppings of a foot or so go within that side yard setbacka They are approved by various building departments that I have built in and by the CC&R's of the local subdivisions. So we need to take a look at this and get in step with the rest of the valley. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, maybe we ought to pull that ordinance out and put it in the workshop and take a look at what we can craft around and clean it up. Morrow: Very good, I agree with that let's put it on the agenda for our planning session. ITEM #13: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 8.5 ACRES TO C-G AND R-2 BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite the representative of Econo Lube N'Tune Inc. to step forward. Patrick McKeegan, 218 S. Cole Road, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. McKeegan: I would like to preface my remarks that if I grimace tonight it is not in response to you I have an injured back. Two items of clarification before I start. In the notification for the public hearing it says annexation and zoning of 8.5 acres it is my understanding that the rear 5.5 acres was withdra\^ll1 from the application, is that correct Shari? Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 20 Stiles: Yes, but the application is going forward as originally requested. McKeegan: I have discussed the next item with Shari, on page 43 of the revised findings of fact and conclusions of law, item I on that page reads establishing the 35 foot landscape setback as suggested under the comprehensive plan and landscaping the same. All previous approvals of this at the Planning and Zoning Commission were for 25 feet and that was recommended originally by the Planning Director to be in conformance with the property to the west. So that you would have uniform landscape setbacks along Fairview Avenue on this side of the street. I wanted to clarify that and make sure that was entered into the record that the 25 foot was what was approved and what we have always been designing tOa With those two specific requirements I just take your leave, there are three items here that we are going to be discussing tonight, I would be glad to give you as much information as you would like concerning the project. It was discussed at length at the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved in that venue. We have conformed to all of the requirements that have been requested by the various governmental agencies that have reviewed the project and unless you want me to elaborate in any more detail I would just be here to answer any questions you might have on our request. Corrie: Council any specific questions at this time? McKeegan: Representatives from Econo Lube and Schucks are here to answer any questions you may have and also Joe Canning the engineer that prepared the plat is also in attendance. Corrie: Is there anyone else from the public that would like to issue testimony at this time? Morrow: Mra Mayor, can I ask a technical question here, is it possible to combine these testimony for these four fellows for all three items that they testify one time given the fact that there is nobody here from the public to offer any other testimony? Corrie: Council I don't see any problem with that do you? Crookston: With the consent of the applicant's that would be fine. McKeegan: I would not object to that. Morrow: That being the case then I would like to hear from each of the members of your team Mr~ McKeegan and a short presentation by each. Dennis Thorton, 13571 Carol Way, Tuston, CA, was sworn by the City Attorney. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 21 Thorton: I guess as a way of a presentation Econo Lube N'Tune is the moving party here, we are under contract to acquire this parcel of land in a development agreement with Schucks to divide the land as well as have it annexed. We are planning a 2800 square foot facility there on little more than % acre. We will provide adequate parking. Our hours of operation would be typically about 7:00 7:30 in the morning to approximately 6:00. It would be very rare that I would find anybody there after 5:30 actually but just to be conservative I would tell you until about 6:00. On Saturday's it would be typically 8 to 5 Sundays as well. Sundays would be kind of a community situation, some communities we found it beneficial to close on Sundays because we don't have a sufficient. But the company would attempt to operate on Sunday~ We have put forth a design that we believe would be attractive for the community, an excellent presentation. We placed the building back as far as it is so that it was uniform with the adjacent development so that we could have cross access across the front. We have also done that, we stage our customers to the front for a couple of reasons, one is to provide that the customer can go in from the front and any handicapped can park there in the front and don't have to walk around the back of the facility~ We also believe that it provides a little safer environment. For example this time of year when at 5:00 5:30 it is dark and we don't have people out in the back of the facility. So I don't know, we tried to conform with the landscaping once again it is consistent with what you have to the west of the property. Other questions? Corrie: Thank you Glen Buday, 645 E. Missouri Ave., Phoenix, AZ, was sworn by the City Attorney. Buday: We are planning to build as the plat shows or the site plan shows just east of Econo Lube our building is about a 7,000 square foot building~ It is one of the newest style buildings that Schucks is putting up at present. We are trying to expand our services by about 1 00 stores a year and this will be one in the Boise and Meridian area. It has a front entrance to it, we like to keep all of our parking up front where the main entrance is. We also like to have our front entrance face the main street which is Fairview. We try to have parking around the building but with the restraint of the size of the lot which is the only I think about 130 feet of frontage it is very difficult to do that. We would rather not have parking in the back because of the safety issues. Also people carrying their batteries or oil or merchandise to the back it creates a little bit of problem. Our hours of operation are from 8 to 9 in the evening, Mondays through Friday and also Saturday. Sunday it could be from 9 to 7, let me stand corrected the hours of operqtion depending on the manager it could be 8 to 7 on Monday through Friday and Saturday and, let me get this straight. The hours of operation would be from 7 to 9 Monday through Friday and also Saturday depending on the manager and 9 to 7 on Sunday. We also try to incorporate landscaping as was mentioned in the front as well as along the building. We tried to keep the drives wide enough so that we have correct circulation for the customers coming in. We have a trash pad in the back that is out of view of the front of the street. We also have a cross easement agreement with Econo Lube so that there Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 22 is one main entrance to get into the facility and there is a cross access easement for parking as well as drive. I am open to any questions. Tolsma: Is this going to be a (inaudible)_ Buday: I don't think this one at this point is slated for commercial, I don't have that information in front of me but I would be happy to get it to you. It is up to the manager the size of the facility, the demographics as well. But the way the sales forecast were made for this project to allow it to be in this location I don't believe that commercial is part of it. That could change. Tolsma: I had a few people ask me. Bentley: I wanted to ask you about your signage, what are you planning to do? Buday: We are looking at putting our typical, do you have that package there with you I think it is in the package. Our plan would be a pole mounted sign that would be a 5 by 20. I think the package you have there shows a 6 by 24 we have reduced that to a 5 by 20. The front side would be about a 4 foot by 30 foot sign. The sign on the side of the building would be probably a 3 by 24. Tolsma: Those signs are the typical signs? Buday: Yes the typical signs, very similar to the one that is over on Overland in Boise. Bentley: Is there anyway we can get them combined? Buday: Welt it is something that we can discuss, we both like to keep our independent signs for obvious reasons. I don't know how we would be able to combine them. Bentley: Have you given any thoughts to doing monument signs? Buday: Not at this point, we have discussed it but we both also discussed the fact that we need to have proper store identification which is typical for both Econo Lube as well as Schucks. But we haven't put together any designs or haven't gone any further than discussing it. It might be a possibility but we both would like to keep our independent signs. Bentley: What is your approach going to be when Boise goes to no pole signs? Buday: Well then we would have to go to monument signs. We try, we stay within all of the restraints and guidelines that the cities set forth. If that was a requirement that is what we would do. Bentley: I would sure like to see a little different signage on that. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 23 Corrie: Where do the signs go in the configurationr can you show me? Buday: Then we would have a front sign on the front of our building and then a sign off the east side. Corrie: Any further questions? Joe Canning, 5505 West Franklin, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. Canning: Mayor and members of the Council, I am the engineer I guess the last member of the team to speak tonight. I think I should start by saying I have specific knowledge of item #13 and 14 and of course some knowledge of item 15. I think I can give some direction as far as where to ask question perhaps more than anything else. If you have specific questions regarding the annexation and zoning or the preliminary plat I am probably the one to talk to. If you have specific questions regarding the conditional use application I know some but probably the other applicants are little more appropriate to ask questions to then myself. The preliminary plat is fairly straight forward, it is four lots. It is to accommodate of course the two commercial buildings in front. The two lots in the back are basically there because the distance from Wilson Lane up to Fairview is too much. The applicant's don't need all that much ground. So it necessitates the addition of those two lots in the back. I really don't have too much else to add, I would be happy to answer any questions or I am sure any of the other team members would also be happy to answer any other questions you have. Morrow: Mr. Canning, what is the size in terms of acres of the entire plat now without the back property? Canning: The back property being the area south of Wilson Lane. Morrow: That is correct the property that was at one time proposed to be R-2. Canning: I have that, I may have to dig for it, 2.36 acres. Bentley: Do you have any plans on those back two lots? Canning: Not as far as the platting process goes, I may have to defer that question to some of the other team members. Thorton: At this point in time we are negotiating with the Schrandt family who owns the property to the west. They would like to utilize the back portion of that I think for some additional parking. Perhaps even to move some of bins that are so attractive up there on Fairview, backward. We are trying to work that out as well as, at this time I am not going to represent we will have a cross access agreement, we are tying to work that out with the Schrandt's. Any other questions? Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 24 Morrow I have a question of staff, Shari, Mr. McKeegan asked about the condition I, on page 43, establishing 25 feet instead of 35 feet, your comments on that please? Stiles: Typically on the new annexations we have been requiring the 35 feet. In the case of D & B they negotiated so that it would be 25 feet and I just felt that for consistency there the 25 feet would be sufficient. Morrow: Thank you Bentley: Shari, your thoughts on the signage? Stiles: I would prefer to see monument signage, they did indicate in the public hearing at the Pfanning and Zoning Commission that if that was the desire of the City that is what they would do. Corrie: Any further discussion? At this point I will close the public hearing on the request for annexation and zoning. Morrow: Mr. Mayor I have no further discussion concerning this issue I am prepared to offer a motion with respect to the findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the annexation and zoning. Bentley: I would like to have a discussion with the Councilor at least get their opinions on the signage and possibly going with monument signs instead. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, in response to Mr. Bentley's question my motion was going to indicate that a condition of approval be monument signage and have the motion stand the test or not stand the test~ Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions Rountree: I just wanted to be clear is this motion for 13, 14 an 15 or 13 only? Morrow: For agenda item 13 only because we have to do, I think the proper procedure here is we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law and if that is acceptable then we adopt the decision. If that is acceptable then we instruct the City Attorney to prepare an annexation ordinance. And then based on the annexation ordinance we would defer the preliminary plat until our next meeting upon adoption of the annexation ordinance and then at that point in time we as a Council can approve the preliminary plat and approve the conditional use permit. Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law as prepared for us by P & Z with these changes, item I on page 43 to read Uestablishing a 25 foot landscape suggest as suggested under the comprehensive plan and landscaping the same", the second item is a stipulation and we will label that item #33 that the signage for both businesses Econo Lube NTune ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 25 and Schucks be monument signage and that all other conditions of the findings of fact and conclusions be left as written. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded, discussion? Bentley: Do we have to adjust the acreage? Morrow: Good point Mr. Bentley, question Shari? Stiles: Is it spelled out specifically in these findings, we do have two separate legal descriptions that delineate the C-G portion and the R-2 portion. Morrow: Well for purposes of clarity I wish if I may Mr. Mayor incorporate in the motion that the land area being annexed and zoned here is 2.36 acres. I do believe that it is somewhere within this document. Bentley: 2.36 is the back lots I believe. Morrow: That includes the preliminary plat according to Mr. Canning's testimony the preliminary plat would be lots 1 and 2 and 3 and 4. It is Corrie: Well the whole thing is 8.5 is that correct and the part that we are talking about as far as the request for annexation and zoning is 2.36 is that correct? (End of Tape) Stiles: (Inaudible) I guess would include thE? right of way. Morrow: So my point would be in terms of the motion would not need to add property size. Buday: Since you have closed the public hearing am lout of line to ask a question? Corrie: You may ask but we may not be able to answer. Buday: I guess I don't have a problem with the monument sign issue as long as it is consistent with what is going on adjacent to us in future growth of the area like the Hollywood Video that is going in and the shopping center that is going to go in adjacent. Is it going to be consistent throughout the area? That would be my question, obviously as a businessman we obviously want to get as much visibility as we can. We want to make this as nice an area for your City as possible. But if Hollywood Video and the shopping center get different treatment than we are I guess I would just ask that question. ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 26 Morrow: Mr. Mayor, if I may take a shot at this, I think it is clear that further west on Fairview we have asked for monument signs in the recent past and that we are moving in that direction. Obviously within 60 days there will be a change in Council it is difficult to say and answer your question specifically that Council will see the same side of this that this Council sees. So at least with this Council our move is toward monument signage wherever possible. Rountree: Walt makes a good point in 60 days it may be the position of the Council not to allow street signage, no signage at all on the streets. Corrie: I think your point is well taken, we have, we are going to be looking at it very closely, we have other areas of concern of people next to 1-84 has the same type of concern. Again Mr. Morrow's point is the fact that we are two are going out in January and two are coming in and it could change. The matter that we are approaching (Inaudible) monument signs will pretty much be the general sign from now on. So your question is hard to answer. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I don't recall that Hollywood Video or the Wingers restaurant had any signage at all except what was on the building. Buday: I appreciate you answering my question thank you. Corrie: The motion has been made and seconded, is there any further discussion? Morrow One further, the point is with respect to, and I want to offer this now although 1 believe it is an item that should be under the conditional use is that we should require an architect's concept of a monument sign with respect to height and so on and so forth~ That is just an editorial? Corrie: Any further discussion? Hearing none roll call vote~ ROLL CALL VOTE: Morrow-Yea, Bentley - Yea, Rountree - Yea, Tolsma -Yea MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Corrie: Decision? Bentley: Mr. Mayor, the City of Meridian hereby decides that the property set forth in the application should be approved for annexation and zoning and issuance of a conditional use permit under conditions set forth in these amended findings of fact and conclusions. That if the applicant is not agreeable to these findings of fact and conclusions and is not agreeable with entering into a development the property should not be annexed. There shall be no development or use whatsoever of the property set forth in the application as being used for anything other than in the planned commercial development for retail. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 27 Even if annexed and zoned general retail and service commercial C-G and such is approved by the City of Meridian prior to commencement of construction and is amended. Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded on the decision as read and amended, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move we instruct the City Attorney to prepare an annexation ordinance. Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to have the City Attomey prepare an annexation ordinance. All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #14: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ECONO LUBE SUBDIVISION BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing, you have already given your testimony but we need you to come up again. Patrick McKeegan: 218 S. Cole Road, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. McKeegan: Mr. Mayor and Council I would respectfully request that the testimony from item #13 be entered with this item also. Corrie: Anybody else from the public that wants to issue testimony on the preliminary plat? Council we will probably need a motion for table. Morrow: I think that is appropriate but we need to close the public hearing. Corrie: At this point I will close the public hearing on the preliminary plat. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we table the preliminary plat to our meeting of November 18th pending the passage of the annexation ordinance. Tolsma: Second Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 28 Corrie: Motion made and seconded to table the preliminary plat until November 18thr any further discussion? AU those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #15: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ECONO LUBE N'TUNE AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHT REPAIR FACILITY AND SCHUCK'S AUTOMOBILE PARTS STORE BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing. Patrick McKeegan, 218 S. Cole Road, Boise, was sworn by the City Attorney. McKeegan: Mr. Mayor and Council I would respectfully request that the testimony presented in item #13 be entered with this item also. Corrie: Is there anyone else from the public that would like to issue testimony at this time? Hearing none I will close the public hearing for the request for the CUP and we need to also table this Council. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we table the conditional use permit for the construction of the Econo Lube N'Tune and also the Schuck's Automobile parts store until our meeting on the November 18th. Rountree: Second Corrie Motion made and seconded to table this until our meeting on November 18th, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea FIVE MINUTE RECESS ITEM #16: RON VAN AUKER: DISCUSSION OF LAND TO EAST OF FUTURE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE: Corrie: I would entertain a motion that we table that to November 18th since we need some people here. Morrow Mr. Mayor I don't necessarily disagree with that, from my perspective this is an issue essentially requesting ground be added to Boise % mile west of Cloverdale Road, I am certainly agreeable to listening to a discussion by the Van Auker people but for the record (inaudible) any ground west of Cloverdale Road being incorporated into the Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 29 Boise City Limits (inaudible) from the stand point of Van Auker (inaudible) they need to understand that is my position (inaudible). Rountree: I am not sympathetic to their issue, I will listen to them but I don't know that they can build a very good case (inaudible). Corrie: This was just for a discussion so if you don't want to hear a discussion you certainly don't have to. Morrow Well I guess from my perspective I am perfectly willing to have to Shari and Gary and myself meet with the Van Auker folk and express my sentiments (inaudible). Corrie: Okay, we will take care of that if you so desire to have (inaudible) come in and see us. Stiles: Gary and I did meet with Brad Miller and Gale Jenson and even though my attitude was not a chance in hell they thought that my belligerent attitude was not going to be the same as the Council. So that is why they wanted the audience. Corrie: If you want me to come in there I would be happy to meet with them~ Gary and I can soothe the savage beast (inaudible). Make a time and we will have a meeting with theme ITEM #17: FARM LAND LEASE WITH KENNETH ASCHENBRENNER: Corrie: I believe you have that before you, any questions of staff or questions you might have on this lease at this point for November 1, 1998. Morrow: I have none Mr. Mayor, this is basically the same standard lease that we have done. I think that the legal description outlines the property that he is leasing, the terms are the same that they have been before. We earlier had assured Mr. Aschenbrenner that he would have a lease if he had gone ahead and prepped for sugar beets consistent with normal farming practices for that. So I would move that we enter into this contract with Mr. Aschenbrenner, authorizing the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to enter into this agreement as written with the mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #18: CANVASSING VOTES FOR CITY GENERAL ELECTION: Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 30 Corrie: Mr. Clerk? Berg: Yes I will open up the ballot boxes and let you examine the tally books and the polling books and if you have any questions concerning that. I think you all had in your box a summary of the returns. Morrow: Mr. Mayor if I might offer this my congratulations to the winner and condolences to the losers and essentially I think we ought to make a statement as the Mayor and Council somewhere that the turn out was pathetic and if folk want democracy to work they have to participate. I don't know how you do that but it is a real frustration. While we are waiting for Mr. Berg, Mr. Mayor point of discussion I throw this out for guys to think about. There were some incidences with respect to City Employees campaigning and so on and so forth. It seems to me that those were outside the bounds of good taste and common sense and fair play. I would like to see us address what is acceptable and not acceptable behavior on the part of City Employees being very careful to recognize their right of free speech and have the City Attorney prepare for us some guidelines by which we can address this issue. Bentley: I agree with that also. I have a real serious problem with it in the fact that we are in the midst of a contract negotiation with some of these employees. I feel that there is possibly some grounds for the Department of Labor action on it too. But to give that I have to have some documented proof of names and approximate times to proceed with that. I am hopeful to do some checking and investigating we can come up with the information. Morrow: Mr. Bentley I don't have a problem with proceeding with that. Bentley: While we are waiting for this, Charlie was so kind that totaled it up, the one race -versus the other race and we are short about 200 voters on the bottom race. I guess they only read the top ticket. Berg: Just to make a point that people vote sometimes just for one candidate, some people write in. It is just random, you can't try to make it an even Steven race. What did you have Charlie for a difference? Rountree: It was closer than I (inaudible) Berg: I didn't think it was too bad. (Inaudible) Bentley: I move we approve the ballots and accounting records. Rountree: Second ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 31 Corrie: All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #19: WATERlSEWERfTRASH DELINQUENCIES: Corrie: This is to inform you in writing if you choose to you have the right to a pre- determination hearing at 7:30, Wednesday November 5 before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the Claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill are delinquent, you may retain Counsel. This service will be discontinued on November 12th unless payment is received in full. Your are hereby informed that you may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court pursuant to Idaho Code. Even though they appeal their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn off list is $56,762.26. Bentley: So moved Rountree: Second Corrie: The motion has been made and seconded that we approve the turn off list. All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #20: APPROVE BILLS: Bentley: So moved Tolsma: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the bills, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #21: DEPARTMENT REPORTS: Corrie: Ms. Stiles Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council the first item I had was on Meridian Automotive, as you recall they recently did a conditional use permit to add to their building there. Since that time they dug out a lot of the right of way and the rail road right of way and are putting in some road mix. Through my discussions with John Nesmith it is his intention to use that access off of East First Street for the rail road as a driveway to go into his property there. He had a building permit application in at the City. After I talked to him and told Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 32 him that he wasn't approved for any use of that property he continued. So Dean went out and also talked to him and told him that was not in accordance with his conditional use permit and to stop and also send him a letter giving him the findings of fact and conclusions of law and stating that he was in violation of his conditional use permit. Since that time and since the work continued we let him know that we were not going to issue the building permit, it didn't appear that he was willing to comply with the terms of the conditional use application that was approved. And then he had his attomey contact me saying that it was not an encroachment of that because they had a lease with Union Pacific Railroad and that meant that they were able to use the property anyway they felt. That encroachment would be building on it and that is not my definition of encroachment but since it is not defined in our ordinance that is pretty much where we stood. The attorney wanted to settle it as soon as possible. He agreed if John wanted to use that for a driveway he should come back in with another conditional use permit to get that approved by Council. In the mean time they want to get the building permit so we had agreed if they would go ahead and finish leveling out what is there and have a notarized statement that they promise to cease and desist until they went through the proper approvals and then they could get their building permit So I just wanted to update you on that, that he may be coming back in. I don't feel that it was appropriate for him to be using that access directly off the tracks for a driveway not intending to pave it or anything else~ We had indicated that if anything that should be beautified. The work he has done there has been improvement as far as what it looked like. There were a lot of rail road ties and it was weedy. My fear is once he gets his building permit and he gets an occupancy it will become an overflow impound yard or who knows what. I just wondered if you had any comments on that? Morrow: I have a question, where does the rail road property how far does it go in terms of this particular building. Is the rail road property end at the fence line or does it go on into. Historically the rail road property has been about 200 foot wide swath. Stiles: 1 00 feet each side. Morrow: So is the building that they are currently in is that owned is the ground under that owned by the rail road? Stiles: No, I think where their property line is right now is where the existing fence is. Morrow: So let me ask you this, does not Union Pacific have some say in who gets to use their property and who doesn't use it? Stiles: They entered into a lease. I called Union Pacific Rail Road and asked them about it and when I talked to the real estate guy at Union Pacific rail road and told him about it being old town and that we need to approve all uses and that we were preserving that as an open corridor he acted like well it is none of the City's business what they did. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 33 Morrow Well it certainly is the City's business because in terms of annexation Union Pacific as I understand it has had a policy not against opposing annexation of the rail road right of way within annexation of developments that are adjacent to it. So once it is annexed it would be under the same rules as the conditions of the annexation for everybody else would it not. Crookston: It would Morrow: So I guess in my opinion the same rules apply to them as apply to anyone else in any other kind of zone. As long as they have an executed lease with Union Pacific that gives them the right to come and ask for a conditional use. (Inaudible) so what I am asking is even given now that the valid lease is there they stilt have to go through the same conditional use process as anybody else would. Crookston: That is correct as long as that leased ground was not included in the initial conditional use. Bentley: There is also another problem they have got that ACHD isn't going to allow them access with having gravel right up to the edge of the current pavement. Stiles: I think their policy is paved a minimum of 30 feet back. But that access is so close to the tracks John said he wanted to use that access and use that property as a driveway because with the new configuration of his building he didn't want to have to make such a sharp 90 degree turn to get his vehicles into the building. Which I can understand but he should have known that before he submitted his conditional use. Bentley: But a follow up to that too when UP came in here and saw these temporary docks for the regia sprinter that guy went into orbit that there was something going on constructed so close to the tracks~ I just find it hard to believe that they would turn around and lease it and let the guy virtually drive up to the tracks. I can foresee somebody parking up close to the track and a train coming along and we will pick him up about a mile down the road. Tolsma: I think Union Pacific was used on the main line and these guys are on a side track over there which is (inaudible) and it goes on through (Inaudible) Corrie: So have they agreed to come back to Council with a conditional use permit? Stiles: I haven't heard from John, I have only heard through his attorney. That his attorney agreed that if he was going to do that he needed to come back through for a conditional use permit. Once he gets his building permit he is not going to care. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 34 Stiles: I don't know if you have noticed it there just south, he took out a lot of dirt in there and I guess there were some rail road ties and he offered to go get it and put it back in there. I don't really know what the whole story is, he has taken out a lot of dirt He has gone to a lot of expense and he is putting back in a lot of road mix but it looks like the road mix is going to cover the entire area between his property and the rail road. I can't imagine anyone going to that expense just to get a driveway. (Inaudible) Rountree: (Inaudible) ACHD needs to make the decision relative to access. Stiles: There is an existing curb cut So I don't know if they would even comment. Rountree: They may, they may want it closed. Stiles: I don't know, I asked Ada County Highway District about it and they said it was pretty much a City problem. But if they got another application they would deal with it then. Smith: Mr. Mayor, I think as I recall when East First Street was improved that access was just for the rail road to do their periodic maintenance of their right of way. That access has gone unused since the thing was built, but it sure seems to me like that is a big time problem and if he is going to use that as access in and out and it is that close the rail road I don't know why somebody shouldn't say something. Maybe it is a condition in the lease I don't know. It should be addressed by somebody. Tolsma: I think we ought to have a copy of his lease. Stiles: I will see if I can (inaudible) Corrie: (Inaudible) we haven't given him the building permit have we? Stiles: I don't think so. I just wanted to kind of see what you thought. The next item despite what was said in the Statesman I am not saying I am real excited and how wonderful it would be to have this Hubcap Heaven in the NAPA store. It is not Hubcap Heaven it is not the one that is down in Garden City with the Hubcaps all over the outside of the building and the trash heap. I can't remember the name of it, it is a franchise, apparently they are operating now in Utah and Oregon I believed. They said it was all contained inside the building and there would be no outside display of them. This doesn't have to do with Hubcap Heaven as much as all of the stores in Old Town that become empty and this conditional use process that is not working very well and is discouraging people from filling up those empty building. There is a clause in the ordinance that says similar uses may be continued with new owners as long as it is a similar use they may continue that use with new owners and new occupants with a letter from the Zoning Administrator or that the Zoning Administrator may refer it to City Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 35 Council. I guess I would rather refer it to City Council then run everybody through a conditional use permit. Everybody that has come in about the Intermountain Arms or we are going to have Lumberman's here pretty soon and the NAPA store. First thing if you tell you need a conditional use permit they don't want to have anything to d with it they would rather go get a new building. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Stiles: That is what they thought, it is a similar use Morrow I don't have a problem with this, I guess where I am seeing this, if somebody comes along and that is clearly the same as what was there before loosely we can (inaudible) and the Council can say go forward with that then they don't need a conditional use. Even at that it is a little onerous to the extent that it could be a two week period. You and I have had the discussion that very rarefy will a renter or a buyer wait two days to find out whether they can buy or rent be it individual or businesses. So if somebody is willing to wait two weeks for a determination of whether they need a CUP or not I don't really have a problem with the staff saying it is the same we will get it verified with the Council but go on with your deal. Stiles: I understand why it was written the way it was because you could end up with anythinga Corrie: That is where staff can make some of the decisions made. Bentley: Two points on this, first off is I don't think it would need to wait a 2 week period for us to show Upa I think the ordinance gives her part of the authority to make a decision on that. If she has a question she can call us. Secondly how do we control say somebody wants to go in there selling hubcaps, under the situation you are saying how does she say you can do that but (End of Tape) Morrow: Well very candidly from my perspective you could do it in the same format of the hearing officer with conditions of approvala You can empower a hearing officer to make, or listen to the presentation and then come back with these are the conditions of approvaL You have the right to appeal to the Council if you disagree with that in which case you go on the agenda. Bentley: I agree if we are going to follow it like that it is just that we need the safe guards in place and I agree with the fact that the conditional use in some of these areas it is going to kill us if we don't clean it up. Stiles: We could through a certificate of zoning compliance that is issued to them outline the signs and those kinds of things. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 36 Bentley: That is my only concern to make sure that we, because we have already started the process to try and clean up some of the stuff and we want to make sure we continue it. Rountree: That would be my only concern, I think the zoning certificate is the way to condition it and rely on some of the language in the zoning ordinance to be the control of architectural appearance and signage and that sort of thing. But I (Inaudible) another bureaucratic process. If it is reasonable and it is an outfit that has a track record they have a presentation that had credibility I would say staff go with it. You are going to have to rely in some cases on gut instinct but some of the stuff is pretty obvious if you feel you have enough control. Stiles: I am not sure we have that~ Corrie: Well if they don't abide by the rules that you write in .that agreement then they come back to the Council and we will take care of it. Rountree: (Inaudible) Stiles: That is the thing even when they go through the conditional use process they don'f comply. We this Hair Galleria down here that specifically they were to have all signs approved not to have the temporary signs welJ they have a temporary sign sitting out there. They knew that they had to go through the Councilor at least to get a license for having a massage therapy there and they have a big sign out front saying massage therapy and they have pretty much thumbed their nose at Dean and said quit harassing. Bentley: Are they under conditional use? Stiles: Yas Bentley: Send them a letter and tell them they have ten days to get in here and straighten it up or we are going to open a hearing to pull their conditional use permit and we will just shut them down. Stiles: Can the police department issue citations for somebody running an illegal establishment for the massage part of it? Gordon: I don't think so (inaudible) Stiles: I don't know how that reads. Berg: I am not sure either but the requirement is to have a license for massage therapist whatever manner it is. When those peddlers are selling door to door and you stop them can you issue them any citation or you just say you have to go get a license and they run off and you don't see them again? ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 37 Gordon: (Inaudible) Morrow: Mr. Mayor, part of the answer here is the conditional use the City has the right to review, all we have to do is send them a letter that we are going to review their conditional use based on the perceived violations and start the process. Then we have given them notice or given them their due process their opportunity to have a discussion before the Council and the Council hears it and either they comply or we disband the conditional use. Corrie: Mr. Crookston, can't we have a standard letter to that effect that once the Planning and Zoning person notifies them and gives them the ten day notice out or do we need to tell you and you send the letter out. Crookston: We can have a standard letter. Rountree: I guess my question on that particular issue is the thing I would ask myself is do we need to regulate massage therapy at this point in time and history any more than we need to regulate hypnotists that we have in our regulations and ordinances. That is the first thing I guess I need to ask myself is if that is something we even really need to regulate. If we do then let's press the issue, if we don't then let's take a look at our ordinance. Gordon: Mr. Mayor and Council I don't have hackles, I lost them a long time ago, the regulation on the masseuses and the massage parlors was a prevention ordinance that was brought in I think just prior to you getting on the Council Mr. Rountree. What this does is it regulates prostitution and it closes the door on this is where prostitution moves in is through massage parlors and masseuses. They come in and call themselves one thing. This ordinance eliminates that possibility. When they come in for the background check then we know what they are and if they are massage therapists which is all we have had so far and they have all been good ones. But that ordinance keeps the shady ones out, so I will throw that back to you. Do we need that ordinance. Rountree: No, if you are that impassioned and that is the reason why then it seems to me you are the regulator. Gordon: This was at the suggestion of the Boise police department that we had this on before they got into the problem that they had. Corrie: Believe if we kept that out (inaudible) Crookston: I believe we have had the ordinance for close to ten years. Berg: My question to Shari on this conditional use, I don't know if the owner knows that there is any violations or anything being done. We have been contacting the building, Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 38 the guy that was there that used to have the insurance company there. He seems to be very conscientious about certain things so if he knew that there were some violations being done he may be putting some hammers down too. Stiles: Well it kind of blind sided him to even think that he had to have a conditional use because he owned the property for so long. But sometimes I don't know if the owners know what it is going on with the occupancy of their building and if it is in violation then maybe address a letter to him stating some situations that we need to get some help on and if he knows he could have his conditional use permit come up for review again then maybe he will put some hammers down on the renters. Bentley: We received quite a list from Dean a whole list of these violations that we have got and the same thing I think should be applied there. I think it should be automatic I don't think he should need to come before us and ask us what should I do or whoever your enforcement officer is going to be. We have set the rules, we have set the ordinances they need to just go ahead and start issuing the letters and starting bringing these people forth up for review. And maybe if we bring a couple through here and they see that we mean business maybe we can knock off some more of these people from even attempting to go through it like this. Morrow: Mr. Mayor, I think part of that list that Glen refers to however was occupancies and temporary occupancies and those kinds of things. I think if memory serves me the Council was going to have a discussion about we have some enforcement issues there and we have some problems with that and we were going to have a discussion whether we were even going to press head with occupancy certificates or not. And so I am not sure that we have horse power at least with temporary stuff that is not CU's to do anything other than to have a discussion about what it is we are going to do with occupancy certificates. Corrie: Good discussion material, I think you have the Hubcap thing pretty well taken care of. Stiles: Elvira hasn't come before City Council yet, this is a subdivision on Ruth Crow's property just west of Danbury Fair. Where Five Mile Creek runs through here, the only thing I wanted to talk to you about is Ada County Highway District has requested that this piece of Washington Avenue that you previously saw I think as D'Arlene Stutzman wanted it vacated to I don't know what she was going to do. Now as they proposed it, it is still is public right of way, Ada County Highway District would like that taken out and vacated. The developer could do it but probably end up having to pay for it They said if the City wanted it they would vacate it and give it to the City for a future pathway. I don't know what that does as far as liability. If this is accurate and I believe it is all of this 30 foot width here clear across the creek is right of way~ There is an existing old flat bed old rail car that crosses the creek there it looks like at least it is off of this 30 foot right of way so that easement (inaudible). I don't know if the City wants to get into maintaining that or that may be up for discussion I guess when they come before. Ada Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 39 County Highway District did want a response. I told him I couldn't give him that response, I didn't know 'Nhether we wanted. In the future we may take over ownership even of the Five Mile Creek area for a pathway if we are able to construct anything there. I wondered if you had any ideas one way or another. Morrow: Let me ask the question there if the City of Meridian takes it do we buy it from Ada County. Stiles: No Morrow What is the difference with letting the development folk have it and use it as a buffer or 'Nhatever for landscape stuff and not charging them for it? Stiles: Apparently it is in their policies that if it is transferred to another public agency they don't have to get fair market value for it Morrow: So 'Nhy don't we get and then give it to the other folk and then let them maintain it. I am opposed to having lots of little pieces of property (Inaudible) and we don't have the capabilities of maintaining it Corrie: Would the developer want it if we gave it to them? Stiles: But if the City owned it doesn't the City have to follow the same procedure as far as disposing of a piece of real property~ Morrow: Well we can set the price that we want to set. Crookston: You have to have it appraised. Bentley: Tell the Highway District we will take it if they waive the balance of 'Nhat we own them over at Tully Park. Stiles: I don't think they are that hot to get rid of it. Crookston: Is there some roadway that is going to cross the Five Mile Creek somewhere? Stiles: Danbury Fair is already developed Corrie: There is a possibility that we could get Five Mile Creek as a pathway but that is down the road. Stiles: That is 'Nhat I was thinking was down the road, but Danbury Fair is all fully developed 'Nhere this would cross would be well here is the right of way there. There is a drainage lot where this flat bed car crosses the creek would line up about where that /' \ Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 40 drainage lot is so there could be a connection between Danbury Fair but never a roadway connection. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Bentley: If we took that over we could take this out and move it over to Tully (Inaudible) Morrow: Let me ask you this what if we do nothing here until a developer (inaudible). Stiles: That is a possibility ~ Morrow: Or let Ada County solve the issue themselves. (Inaudible) Stiles: They do show a private drive come down here too, I guess we need to address that when it comes to Council. They have this 30 foot of right of way it looks like it ends right here. They would have the public roadway and then the strip in there that is private~ So we would need to make that connection but I think it is going to be a pretty vital connection if we ever do anything with Five Mile Creek. Morrow: And I guess my point here is that is a real speculative thing. That is contingent upon us getting it from Bureau of Reclamation. (Inaudible) Morrow: The other thing is we can do it in such a manner that the developer gets the piece of property as part of the landscape buffer with the idea that if it ever becomes a connector to the Five Mite pathway that it has access to Five Mile pathway and we not own it. But (inaudible) Stiles: I would think they are going to want some landscape buffer here to hid this. Tolsma: (Inaudible) Stiles: Okay, so I will just tell Ada County Highway District we have to wait until it gets to City Council and deal with it as part of the public hearing process. That we don't have an answer for them now. I have two things that is not on here. One of them is ham radio towers, Dean got a phone call somebody wanted to put up a 25 foot tower and my grandpa is an old ham and my son is a ham and I guess. Corrie: By their house? Stiles: Yes a 25 foot tower we actually have an ordinance that Dean found on antennas, television and radio antennas. There is a permit required it is $2.00 but I don't think it Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 41 has ever been done. I would hate to have to run somebody through a conditional use permit for a 25 foot. The FCC regulates them as far as interference with other signals. I don't know which subdivision it is in. Bentley: Some of the subdivisions don't allow them. Stiles: Well they can check their covenants, but then that would be up to the homeowners association. I had no problem with somebody putting up a ham Morrow I guess I have a major philosophical problem with this because and we have had this discussion the four years that I have been here. (Inaudible) especially when we have approved by virtue of the approval process of the subdivision the CC&R's. What we are doing is automatically creating conflict (inaudible) putting the burden of enforcement of the CC&R's upon the homeowners there who are really innocent parties. So from my perspective is that the CC&R's prohibit them I don't want to have anything to do with them (inaudible). Crookston: That is the case with almost all of the home occupations and day care things, we allow them. Morrow I am saying that I think we are making a mistake, we the City of Meridian is creating the internal turmoil within the subdivision that comes from this and consequently the expense that the homeowners have to go to hire legal representation to try and iron out the issue that wouldn't (inaudible) in most cases. Corrie: Of course that goes, Mr. Morrow and I go back a long way I said why do we have to even approve CC&R's if we don't enforce them. (Inaudible) I don't think we should get involved with (inaudible) Stiles: I have no idea even how old that ordinance is. (Inaudible) Corrie: I am like Waft say check their CC&R's if they don't have anything against that then 25 foot antenna (Inaudible). I would agree that if it is in the CC&R's why do we approve something that they get in trouble with. Crookston: But they can cause interference with television and other radio. Corrie: If they do then the FCC makes them take it out. True hams won't have a problem with that (Inaudible). Stiles: But this person is being penalized because he is trying to do things the right way whereas when I put the one up at my house I just put it up. So what do you want me to ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 42 tell this person just look at his CC&R's and if they don't have any regulation the City doesn't have any problem with it. Bentley: No the City doesn't have anything to do with it. Stiles: When Dean went to the building department they said yes he needs a permit and the permit is $2.00. Morrow: If that is the regulation that is the way it is. Corrie: (Inaudible) but that being the case (inaudible) Stiles: Okay, one last thing, Walt has seen this previously, this is Gordon Harris's property out on Eagle Road. It is the area, it is about right in here in this mixed residential area. He has got 17.5 acres and I told him that I would go before the Council and approach them one more time. He didn't like Walt's answer or my answer. Our comprehensive plan says minimum five acres, Ada County's comprehensive plan says minimum 5 acres. However Ada County staff continues to send everyone to the City of Meridian to see if maybe they will approve it, a rezoning to go down to 2.5 acres or to 1 acre. I can certainly understand if he wants to live in a development that has larger acreages, I explained our problems with those acreages and getting them sewered later cost effectively and also the problem with urban density coming in all around and these people screaming that they bought out there for this rural lifestyle and their being surrounded and we are not following the comprehensive plan because these people have to buffer them with acre lots all around. So I just wanted to get input from everybody on what you think anything less than the five acres that is in our comprehensive plan. Do we ever want to consider going to a lesser acreage 2.5.1 went out and visited a gentleman today south of Amity on Locust Grovea He has 20 acres, the most beautiful you ever say, rolling terrain, it is actually next to the sand and gravel place that was out there. I guess they are out of gravel now. The guy is wanting to retire and move onto a place where he doesn't have the upkeep, it has $8 million of gravel under it. But he can't sell the property for more than $5000 an acre because he can't, because it is a 5 acre minimum. Corrie: How much land does he have? Stiles: 20 acres Corrie: So he could only sell it for $5000 an acre Stiles: He has been told that he could get $5000 to $6500 Corrie: Is it fairly flat? Stiles: No, there is a portion of it that is flat, there is another portion that is rolling. ( Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 43 Corrie: Could it be made into a park? Stiles: Well it would be a lovely park, but I don't know if the City is wanting to go out that far or as far as (inaudible). Morrow: Shari, part of the answer to his question is $5000 is not a realistic number of 5 acre tracts. Very recently they sell for in the neighborhoods of $60,000 to $70,000. I guess when you and I visited with this gentleman a long time ago it was sure there was a way they can do that outside of the comprehensive plan amendment. Very candidly something as small as 20 acres doesn't make a lot of sense to do a camp plan amendment. I think the bigger issue in terms of us is that if it -is less than 5 acres in size then as we had the discussion with him we have all the issue with sewer, you have all the issue with fire protections and all the other things that come up with this. Very candidly I don't see that my attitude hasn't changed, it needs to be 5 acres and call it good. I am sympathetic to the fact that given their ages it would be nice to sell it now. But there are also some numbers out there that are $10,000 to $12,000 an acre for raw dirt located in the right place. Granted that is probably less than what it will bring developed but our job is to protect our impact area and to create a City long term and a City long term with 1.5 to 2 acre estates can be very nice but it has to be a large enough development they work and it also has to be done with the understanding that there might 8,000 square foot lots surrounding it. Tolsma: The other thing too that I have seen when they go down to the smaller lots is by the time they build the house and the garage and an outbuilding on it there is not a lot big enough to put an animal or anything on so it just becomes trash and junk and everything else. They just store stuff there~ But if you have a larger area by the time you get building on there and your house and your garage you still have enough room out there for animal or raise some hay or com or big garden or whatever. It seems to be a lot well better taken care of when they are larger tracts. If they get down to 1.5 acres or 1 acre tracts and you can look around the City of Meridian here and pick out every 1 acre lot subdivision around here because 75% of it is weeds. Morrow: I think the only exception is like when you do something like Banbury clearly that is a case where a case very well done and they are done as estates but it is also a sufficient size that it makes economic sense to do that and none of these don't, it just doesn't make sense to do that. Ron's scenario is absolutely correct. Tolsma: A prime example of that is the one just off the freeway right out here at the end of Linder Road. You can drive down the freeway and see one acre lots out there. (Inaudible) Corrie: To move it along what is the Council feeling on this one. Rountree: Keep the county direction of the 5 acre. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 44 Stiles: I will be having a conversation with Bob Unger about, I have had the conversation before, this is what our camp plan says, this is what your comp plan says don't send these people out here to try and get us to approve something elsea But it is still happening and it will continue to happen. I just wanted you to reiterate what I have already been telling him and make sure nobody had any different ideas. Corrie: (Inaudible) Chief? Gordon: Nothing Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mra Smith? Smith: I just had one item Mayor and Council, it is a change order for the clarifier project at the Waste Water plant. I think you have copies you should have had a copy in your bin for some electrical revisions to the contract that we have with Turnkey Inc. I would request your approval of the change in contract amount of $2,482.20. Corrie: Anybody have any questions of Gary on this? Morrow: Mra Mayor, I would move that we approve the change order for net increase of $2,482.20 executed on behalf of Turnkey Inc. which would bring the total contract price with approved change order to $613.082.20 Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the change order of $2,482.20 for a total of $613,082.20 any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea Smith: Thank you Corrie: Counselor? Crookston: I sent a letter and copies of my pre-answer motion to dismiss the Ada County versus the City of Meridian. All of you Councilmen were served tonight The letter stated I had no objection to the lawsuit going on if they were willing to amend their restraining order. I asked the restraining order by amended so that the police department could continue to act as it always has done in the past. I sent that to Susan Thomas at approximately 3:00. Tonight you were served by Erwin Sonnenberg with the complainant summons. I assume there is no possibility of an agreementa Corrie: He was to serve that before you ever got it to them, he served me at 2:00. So he didn't know anything about it and I don't think they did either. The service was ( \ Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 45 requested by the Sheriff that they serve each one individuallYe She didn't know anything about that, the two getting together on that one~ I am not saying you are wrong. Crookston: It could very well e but I have had no call back from her and I faxed everything to her and I have had no call from her. So the matter is still pending before the court and before it was my position that the restraining order probably could be held to not be enforced because the mayor or the City Clerk had not been served with any documents~ But since they have not been served that case is now pending and I will file a response to the complainant. Bentley: It would be my preference that we don't sit here and just play pass the paper back and forth between the two attorneys and drag this thing on. I just assume we get on with the show and let our side be told before the Court~ I understand the judge instructed you to try and work it out between the two attomeys~ I think you have made the attempt and if they just turned it down then we press on. Crookston: Just to inform you we have no way to make this go any faster than the court is willing to allow it to go. Bentley: And I understand that but I am saying that the Court I believe you said instructed that if we could not reach an agreement between the two attorney parties that we were to come back before the court both sides at the same time to tell the story is that correct? Crookston: I don't recall that I told you that but that is just the way court cases work. We have to file an answer to their complaint. They have filed the restraining order, we have to have a hearing on that within fourteen days after it was served which would be today. They have asked for a preliminary injunction. They have now served an order to show cause. To my knowtedge that has not been set for a hearing date but it has to be heard within 14 days after it is has been served or else it is not in existence any longer. So I assume we will have a hearing within 14 days from today. Corrie: Anything else Mr. Crookston? Crookston: No Corrie: Mr. Morrow? Morrow: Pass out with respect to last time I gave you all a copy of the proposal over the next several years for sewer expansion plans for capacity and so on and so forth. I have that now tagged also with our capital improvement plans for water so now there is a copy here for each of you of both sewer and water long term plans~ As you can see the situation here as you read these over in the near term is that the population estimates are very conservative~ If we continue they are reflective of somewhat a little bit less than what we have been currently growing at if we have any kind of spurt in terms of Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 46 population that would simply mean the schedule would need to be accelerated. So on both sides of the sewer and water. So the purpose in having that is a reference tool for you and future Councils showing what our plans are and our projections are. Hopefully it would work out this way with an even steady growth, I think that is dreaming, the reality is that this may be a very conservative document and future councils and mayors need to be prepared financially to accelerate the population as required by population growth. Are there any questions? Next thing in our box was a letter from Cherry Lane Homeowners Association and Vernon Croft wanting to know where we are with the LID I guess that is a good question. Does anybody know where we are at with that? Corrie: The letter is going to the Nampa Meridian so we see what they are going to tell us. Shari did you get those from the comment that Gary made a copy of that yet? Anyway as soon as we hear from Nampa Meridian Irrigation on what they allow the fence close to the sidewalk or back whatever it is then we have to make the decision to go after that is done approved or disapproved. Gary has got that all planned out, I thought each of you had a copy of that but maybe if you don't I will see Jim in the morning. Morrow: Maybe then a response then to Mr. Croft would be good notifying him where we are at. Corrie: I have also notified Don Howell by phone and I will send a letter to Vem or call him. Morrow: In our last meeting we had discussions in terms of an overlay in terms of the existing City Hall layout so we can compare that to the proposed remodel. Corrie: We just got it today Morrow So it will be in our boxes tomorrow. Corrie: We got it at 5:00 today. Morrow: That is basically all of the issues that I have as far as I know. Corrie: Mr. Bentley? Bentley: I have got a question on some street lights. I had a kid run over in a cross walk on a bike out there at Cherry Lane and Linder. I mentioned this to Will before, they have those pressurized sodium lights out there that you can't see a damn thing with. You would be better off with a candle (inaudible). Is there any way to get those changed out, that is going to be a commercial intersection anyway to get them to where we have some lights. Secondly we are going to need to put some street lights on the south side of Cherry coming up toward that school, those library lights don't do a damn thing for that out there. We have got all of these kids I know they are jaywalking across there. Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 47 Especially this time of year when they are going to school, it is very dark on that south side. How do we deal with that? Berg: Get some money and put some things in. On the intersection of Linder and Cherry lane, at the intersection? Bentley: Yes he was right at the cross walk. Berg: Well if I am not mistaken aren't those lights put of by ACHD for those signals and we have no control over the wattage or whatever. I can sure call (inaudible) we have discussed the shadows on Cherry Lane. I knew the library wasn't going to cover the light because we put some dampers onto the lights to shine to the neighbors back yard. Bentley: But I mean the south side where the school is I mean it is absolutely black over there when those kids cross the street. Berg: Well we can require the school district to put up some lights along the Football field. If Stubblefield would finally develop their property we would have some lights maybe on that side, but I understand what you are saying. We put some lights on existing poles on the north side. There are just not any poles on the south side. Corrie: Is there any power over there? Berg: I don't think, I don't know if there is. Just to follow up we have talked to Idaho Power about having street lights along Franklin Road the rebuild. They were looking into making sure there were some drop lines or something for us to add some lines because when you have a five lane road it gets kind of dark across the street~ I will talk to Idaho Power and see if there is any power on the south side at all that we can even put up one or two~ Bentley: I think anything would help. Berg: For those couple that one private drive we put up a street light that was on the north side that was just right across the entrance there but I will check into that further. Bentley: Secondly did you bring that check with you? The Chief out of his training budget gets these tests for giving the officers. He had some extra ones they sent them back so the next time he needs them he would have updated ones. Instead of them crediting him they turned around sent him a check back for $492 I would like to know if it is possible to have that check put back into his training budget so that when he needs to order these tests again when he gets new officers he can turn around and reutilize it. Morrow As opposed to it going into the general fund? Bentley: Right Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 48 Morrow: I don't have a problem with it because it was intended to be a credit and it is not a fee or a monies coming due us from services rendered. It is very simply a credit that can go back, as long as it goes back into the same fund it should be fine~ Gordon: What I was curious (inaudible) Corrie: That is the easy WaYa Mra Rountree? Rountree: I just had a question for Gary, is everything moving along smoothly on Tully. It looks like they are moving dirt and staking the parking lot. Smith: It is Councilman so far, we did have a bit a glitch with Idaho Power~ The poles are going to stay where they are and the sidewalk is moving to the east. So we will have a parkway strip between the curb and the sidewalk as opposed to having the sidewalk up against the curb, the power company gave us some bum information on the cost to move the poles. When we finally nailed them down or tried to nail them down they scattered on us. Tolsma: What is the big hole they are digging out in the middle? Smith: I don't know Tolsma: It is pretty close to where that canal should be tiled through there, it looks like they are just scooping a big hole out there in the middle. Smith: I don't know unless they are excavating for that, we have about a 1500 square foot building which has the rest rooms in it and the shop area. Tolsma: I thought it was more back toward the south. This is kind of right out in the middle of the whole park. Smith: I have no idea, unless they found some junk that they are having to haul (End of Tape) Corrie: (Inaudible) I gave those to Walt you guys can review them at your planning meeting and go over thosea So I have talked to Walt about that. Also parks impact fee committee will be meeting very shortly. We have an annual meeting we have to do with the laws, they will go over the impact fees for parks. Morrow: Are you and I still on that? Corrie: The Committee that started that is still there, that is us and we will notify these people as soon as we get, Shari and I are working on all the preliminaries for the CIP and all of that. We have to do that go over it once so it is still legal. Charlie I gave you that one for (inaudible) Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 49 Bentley: Would you add for your foot notes when we have a planning meeting about the collection of park impact fees. We had an interesting proposal brought forth. Corrie: Yes, you might discuss that at your meeting on the 25th, I will not be here at that planning meeting on the 25th I have a previous engagement. I will write that up. Clerk anything? Berg: I just wanted to make a comment to the Council I know some of these ordinances took a very long time to get but I think in the best interest of the City that it is well worth going over them and getting them done right so we don't have to go in the books and change them after we make the mistake. So in any essence the diligence of doing them right the first time is better than going back and trying to cover up mistakes. Corrie: With that I will entertain a motion to adjourn. Morrow So moved Rountree: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to adjourn, all those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:50 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: ATTEST: \ \,utl .,111 1.'11 \\\\ kA~l. III "", of Mqti~l'\, '/~.11' .....' ~~~~ ~..~ ~ ~ A' '-~.01&...' ~1.. ~ ~ v {7" ~ #;;If }- Y 1t ...... t' ...C}J ./::- .L ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ SEAL ~ =. ~ ).? S ~ ~~~ ,~. 0 ~ ~"c :V8r 1S1 · ~ # ~ ~ ~~ .,:-; "'-1'.1 c~ . ,"v,," ~/^ ""UN1"l. ", ",/ \\' 11111 U U ,,\ \' \ \ CHANGE ORDER at; ecrw.,cU II-S'9~ ~ tkff.. IltftJa- 4_~" I No. -L Date: 10/15/97 PROJECT: Primarv Clarifier Addition OWNER: City of Meridian. Idaho NAME & ADDRESS: City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 CONTRACTOR: Turn-Key. Inc. CONTRACT FOR: $610,600 (incl. e.G. No.1) ENGINEER: Keller Associates, Inc. ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO: 196030 You are directed to make the following-changes in the Contract Documents: Description: See attached. Purpose of the Change Order: Necessary electrical revisions. Attachments: (List Documents supporting change) 1. Description of Changes QFCFIVFO OCT 2 1 1997 MERIDiAN CITY ENG(NEER 196030/69-284/cp 101697 Change Order (Rev 4/89) ~::, ..~.~>:.'" ( t' ;J~- L- L: E" R -.:- ~ ~;;, ; . ~ " _? ,.d~~ SSOCIATES, INC. CHANGE ORDER NO.2 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES Item 1 - Add li~htin~ poles: The plans called for lights to be located at the center and periphery of the primary clarifier. However, no specifications or details were provided for the poles or mounting of the lights and were consequently, not included in the Contractor's bid. This item includes the cost for the new poles, mounting bases for the poles, and installation. Item 2 - Add transformer for sludge pump receptacle: A 120 volt receptacle was shown at the sludge pump vault, however, the supply voltage for all pumping equipment was 480 V. A transformer was not shown or specified and had to be added to allow use of the receptacle. Item 3 - Connect torque switch: The primary clarifier torque switch conduit and wiring from the drive unit to the control panel was not shown on the drawings and needed to be added. Item 4 - Up~rade existing flow recorder wirint!: Existing wiring to the flow recorder was unshielded and it was decided to upgrade this wiring with shielded wire at the same time the new flow signal wiring was added. Cost Increase: A lump sum cost increase was negotiated prior to performing the work and is attached. The total cost increase of $2,482.20 is considered justified and reasonable. The increased cost would have originally been in the Contractor's bid if the additions would have been shown on the plans and specifications. 196030/69-286/cp 101697 CHANGE ORDER CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Original Contract Price: $ 606.000.00 Previous Change Orders No. -L to No. $ 4,600.00 Contract Price prior to this Change Order $ 610,600.00 Net Increase of this Change Order $ 2,482.20 Contract Price with all approved Change Orders $ 613.082.20 CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: 180 Davs Original Contract Time: o Net change from previous Change Orders 180 Davs Contract Time prior to this Change Order o Contract Time with all approved Change Orders 180 Davs RECOMMENDED: A9~?>2. '><::?~NGINEER APPROVED: OWNER APPROVED: CONTRACTOR 196030/69-284/cp 101697 \ \ Change Order (Rev 4/89) OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E., City Engineer BRUCE D. STUART, Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WALTW. MORROW. President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 · FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 Motor Vehicle/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH MEMORANDUM RECEIVED N 0 V - 4 1997 atY OF MER.IDIAN TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ROD MEDLEY, MECHANICAL INSPECTOR DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1997 In an effort to stay current with the Mechanical Codes, we should adopt the 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code. Both the City of Boise and Ada County are in the process of adopting these codes. I am requesting we adopt the code as it IS written with the exception of the following two items: 1. To use a percentage on commercial permits. Such as 1.5% plus $23.50 to write the permit. This is .5% less than Boise is charging. 2. Delete sections 1027 and 1028 requiring an operating permit and an annual maintenance inspection on boilers. I would like to start enforcing the new code by January 1, 1998. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me. Thank you for your consideration. C / L Wi- w-rndd /1..U-~ /-0 ~~ ~ (;rL~~~ -to ~ eX-o/l-C -rhe Co~ tJ/'f-/L aYnehd~ ~5 Jdu 4)1~ OFFICIALS WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. SMITH. City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH. P.E.. Cfty Engineer BRUCE D. STUART: Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS. Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS. Fire Chief W.l. "BILL" GORDON, Police Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR., Attorney HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 · FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 Motor VehiclelDrivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH FACSIMILE COVER SHEET TO: FAX NUMBER: 88$- '193~ rn f4 \ ; DELIVER TO;; Lc:QQJ yr\..~",\ TITLE/DEPARTMENT: DATE: lu/ '2- ) ADDRESS: CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): I ,. L.-V FROM: CITY OF MERIDIAN NAME: {,vl"'A TITLE/DEPARTMENT: C~JLI (' /\.t:J\~Y\' ~ (\t;t\:? c \ I} ~ COMMENTS: t~f\ () Ar:t .\L1(o/-- ~\(LO' I /'r' f:J-I;;' FAX NUMBER (208) 887-4813 PLEASE CALL US IF YOU DO' NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY. (208) 888-4433 CI-TY Or Mt::::RIDIAN GENERAL LEDGER DETAI~ DATE: 10/27/'37 PAGE - 1 ACCOlmt #: 01-0350.20.10 - 01-0350.20.10 POST I _~ DfiL~_~QDE I='ERIOD DATE DETAIL DESCRIPTION DEBIT C~:ED I T ~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~--~-~-~~~~~~~~~~-~--~~-~-~---~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~ ACCOUNT: 01-0350.20.10 GENERATIONS PLAZA-DONATIONS DEBIT BAL: 03/18/97 JCR 1101 03/19/97 ICOLUMN DONATION/GENERATIONS PLI 03/21/97 ICR 1131 03/25/97 IPAVER/GENERATION PLAZA 1 03/26/97 ICR 1161 03/28/97 IGENERAloION PLAZA/BRICK I 03/26/97 leR 1161 03/28/97 IGENERATION PLAZA/BRICK I 04/01/97 I CR 1191 04/04/97 I GENERATION l='lAZA/BRICK 1 04/03/97 feR 1211 04/04/97 'GENERATION PLAZA/BRICK I 04/03/97 I CR 1211 04/04/97 I GENERA'rION PLAZA/BRICK I 04/04/97 leR 1221 04/08/97 IGENER.PLA7A/PILLAR/PLAQUE I 04/07/97 I CR 1231 04/08/97 I GENERATIONS PI._AZA/BRICK I 04/07/97 ICR 1231 04/08/97 IGENERATIONS PLAZA/BRICK I 04/08/97 leR 1241 04/11/97 IGENERATIONS PLAZA/BRICK I 04/08/97 feR 1241 04/11/97 IGENERATIONS PLAZA/BRICK I 04/09/97 I CR 1261 04/14/97 I GF:NERATIONS t='LAZA/BRICK I 04/09/97 feR 1261 04/14/97 IGENERATIONS PLAZA/BRICK I 04/11/'37 I CR 1281 04/14/97 I GENERATIONS PI...A'ZA (BRICK) I 04/15/97 leR 1311 04/17/97 IGENERATIONS PLAZA/BRICK I 04/15/97 I CR 131 J 04/17/97 I GF:NERA1.IONS PLAZA/BRICK I 04/21/97 ICR 1361 04/23/97 IDAU-JILL PAULA & SHELLY I 04/~2/97 feR 1361 04/23/97 IGFN~RATIONS PLAZA/BRICK I 04/22/97 leR 13~1 04/23/97 IGENERATIONS PLAZA/BRICK I 05/05/'37 I CR 1471 05/06/97 I BRICK/HAROLD & ELBERTA ROSS I 05/0'5/97 I CR 14071 05/06/97 I BRICK/RAJ_P~~ & JUDY ROSS I 05/05/97 leR 1471 05/06/97 IBRICK/LOREN & GAYLA ROSS I 06/02/97 ICR 1651 06/03/97 IMARY BOICE-BRICK/GENERT.PLAZA I 06/24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 IGENE & LORI SMITH\2BRICKS I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 IEDNA N POTTER\BRICK I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 ISILVER SAGE GIRLS SCOUT COUNCIl 06/24/97 feR 1811 06/25/97 tEETH BIDDICK\PAVER I 06/24/97 I CR 1811 06/25/97. I LUCILLE" SIEVJ::RT\BRICK I 06/24/97 feR 1811 06/25/97 IMER. GOSPEL TABERNACLE\PAVER , 06/24/97 J CR 1811 06/25/97 I EV~RT & MARloHA ROBERTS\BRICK I 06/24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 IWILBUR OR ELMA CALNON\BRICK I 06/24/97 rCR 1811 06/25/97 IJOHN OR NErA GAIGE\BRICK I ---06/24/97ICR 1811 06/25/97 I Ef_IZABETH KUSLER\BRICK I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 IMARVIN & BETTY GOODWIN\2BRICKSI 06.124/97 I~R 18~ I 06/25/97 I GLENN OR BONt'lIE BENTL Y\J:IAVER I 06/24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 IOPAL OR DEAN MERRELL\BRICK I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 IEl.IZABETH ATWELL\2 PAVERS I 06/24/97~lC;B 181.-L~t~/25!97 I TAMMY & JAN DEWEERD/PAVER I - -06;24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 IMARY KOlA\BRICK I 06/24/'37 I CR 1811 06/25/97 I WILLIAM & JOY ~E HAYS\I='Avr-::R I _._ 06(J~4./~? -1~.R_J_~lJ__~~/~5L'?llRAY MCf:.)(iERSOI\f\BRICK I 06/24/97 feR 1811 06/25/97 IBFSSIE ALGFR\BRICK I 0.00 I 1,000.00 I 100.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 1,000.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 50.00 I 25.00 I 50.00 I 100.00 I 100.00 J. 100.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 1 25.00 I 50.00 I 50.00 I 25.00 I 50.00 I 25.00 I 50. t"10 I 100.00 I 25.00 I 100.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 25.00 I 50.00 -._L___.__ 100.00 I 25.00 I 200.00 I 100.00 I 25.00 I 100.00 _____._..1..__ ..~_.._~5. 0_~__ I 25.00 ( C~T.'Y Olf-' M~R I D J: eN GEN~RAL LEDG~R DETAIL DATE: 10/27/97 Acc_ount it: 01-0350.20. 10 - 01-0350. 20. 10 PAGE - 2 I='DST ._-PitTE CODE PERIOD DATE DETAIL DESCRIPTION DEBIT Cf:~EDIT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT: 01-0350.20.10 GENERATIONS PLAZA-DONATIONS DEBIT BAL.: 06/24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 'BILL & VIOLA TETER\BRICK I 06/24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 ICLARENCE & RUTH WIEGERS\BRICK I 06/~/~~11 06/25/97 JTFD HFPPFR\BRICK I -.- 0f;/24/'37 t CR 181 J 06/25/'37 I FRED FENDER MD\PAVER I 06/24/97 feR 1811 06/25/97 IROBERT &MARILYN FRIDAY\BRICK I _.~6L JULIE SMI~'PAVER I - 06/24/97 feR 1811 06/25/97 IKIWANIS CLUB OF MER\PAVER I 06/24/97 lCR 1811 06/25/97 ICOUNTRY CORNER\BRICK 1 06/24/'37 I CR 1811 06/25/97 I DOLORI:.S GILLISr:'IE\3BRICKS I ----06;24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 IDARWIN & FAYE BUCHANAN\BRICK I 06/24/137 I CR 181 J 06/25/97 J LORIN OR DORIS WARDlhE\BRICK I 0G/24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 ICATHERINE COX-WILEY\BRICK I 06/24/97 feR 1811 06/25/97 ILARRY OR ANDREY PARKS\BRICK I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 IMARY L MARTIN\BRICK I 06/24/97 feR 1811 06/25/97 IJOHN BFRG FAMILY\PAVFR I ~---0-6/24/97 I CR 181 f 06/25/97 I BRENT & LINDA BASTIAN\PAVER I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 JBEN & CAROL HARDINGER\BRICK I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 IS&E MAPA AUTO PARTS\BRICK I --.--0~;2.4/137 I CR 181 J 06/25/97 1 GIESLFRS AUTO PAR1"S\PAVFR I 06/24/97 ICR 1811 06/25/97 fBEN & CHERYL BRITTON\BRICK I 06/24/97 JCR 1811 06/25/97 IDFBRA GIBBONS\BRICK I 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 (BLAINE & JOANNE HEADRICK\BRICKI 06/24/97 leR 1811 06/25/97 IROBERT SMITH\BRICK I 07/09/97 feR 1901 07/11/97 ICAIRNS FAMILY-DON~ SUSIE, I 07/09/97 feR 1901 07/11/97 IBRYCE FAMILY-FRANK, HFLEN, J 07/18/97 leR 1951 07/21/97 'NORMA C. STOUT I 07/18/97 feR 195J 07/21/97 IDELORAS HERGERT I 07/30/97 feR 2041 07/31/97 IJ.8. AND MAYME L. STOUT I 08/01/97 J CR 205 J 08/04/'37 'GENERATIONS Pl_AZA/BRICK I 08/07/97 feR 2091 08/08/97 'GENERATIONS PLAZA/BRICK t 08/14/97 ICR 2141 08/15/97 IOTHA OR ELEN WATTS BRICK I 08/15/97 ICR 2151 08/18/97 I CLARK, JAN & BILL/BRICK 680 I 08/15/'37 I CR 215 J 08/18/97 I MARI..OW, DAVE & KARE:N/BRICK11801 08/15/97 ICR 2151 08/18/97 fKNIGHT, LAVIER, WILLIOW AND I 08/15/97 leR 2151 08/18/97 tOWNBY 8 CO., INC./PAVER I 08/15/97 feR 2151 08/18/97 IMICRO"fOOL CORP/PAVER **34850 I 08/15/'37 I CR 215 J 08/18/97 I RUTAN, l..I:::ONARD & f\IAf\tCY >>6676 J (18/15/97 I CR 2151 08/18/97 f ALL AMERICAN It~SURANCE **54988 1 08/15/'37 I ~R 2~~ I 08/18/97 I JONFS, '_ORT & CLARFf\JCE **1261 I -.---- 08/1-5/9i--fcR 2151 08/18/97 I MCLAUGt~LIN, JOJ~E/PRAVER #1265 I 08/15/'37 I CR 2151 08/18/97 J SOROJ:rrIMIST INT. OF MERIDIAN f 08/15/97 feR 2151 08/18/97 IWALKE~, IDA/PAVER CHK#7707 I 08/15/'37 I CR 2151 08/18/97 I WIGLf, ROSALFE CHK**4826 I 0.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -_....~..._- -.... --__I. ~ I I I f 25.00 25.00 25.00 100.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 75.00 50.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 100.00 100.00 25.00 50.00 100.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 25.00 100.00 1,000.00 25.00 100.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 25.00 - ~~. ---. - -....... -"+ ~ ..... ~.~~... - -----....--- ...._.~~ ~-..... ... .~~- - ............. ~. .~ - - ---_"___ ._."'-"r__1 ~ -.J; .-( ; --l ..-; ~ ~D ir 1 I I f I I , I i f , I I f 1 I I I I I I t I I I I I ! I I f I I i I f I I I I f I I I I I I I .-; ~ i; 0 J iO -; I: D I '~ r I! (J') I (D : 1r- I I I I I I I i f t I I f I i I ;ro ro I if,)) CO I :. · 1(S)Ci1 ( ,(S) (S) : ;-- I I I t I I I I J I i I i J I I z c: ~ 'tt1 fT1 i;lj .0 i""1l '1) In In .0 :c: lZ !~ ~CJ') l-u ::::0 . t-I iZ I . .-1 !rr1 ;d ;11 i... ~tSI I~ G) i ::::0 f iD . D lzn : ("") .~o ! c: Z -of "-.I-....J ... ... fTt(rJ ,m ro :CD co .. . . Cil JSJ '(S) rS) ---.-.- .i~-J ; -, - ) ;j ; ~ ~ I A ~ 'J I )'-- i \ i . (S) ~ tS). tS) IS) tS) I IS) ~ (9: cg (S) IS!: (S) Ci! rg :D I t.J) ;jJ CD! Q:) ()) co 11)) Q:) CD I 0:- CD Q:ll Ct> co co ("") .......... " '.'- " '1'- , 'I' " 'I' " " n ;0,) f-&o u.,LUJ UJ WI'W W W 1!..iJ UJ W IW ra~ ...... 0 : \.D t. 'I .....' t--4 .... ..... .... ..... f-Io /...... ...... .......!.... {'J:} (.11 c: :, ....... ,;, " '- " " '1'- " 'i' ., ....... :z tJ) I..L) u:.; 'JJ ....:; \.0 i..u r..i) I..Q: W ...u ',J) l"":; I.fJ t.,Q ~ ~....... --..J -..J ~ -"J ~ -...J t -....J -....l "-J: -....J -...J ~ ~ ~ -...J -...J .. --... - ~ - ~ ~~- - _1- --- -,- ~ - IS) ..-:: ('"') C-f, C-.t C-j. C-t i C-t C-t c..r I C-f C-f c...... I c....; n c; .... !?:I ;2j rr: d'" fTi I'TlI i'1i f'T1 fTl i fT1 m ""1 fTi ::O:::tl I :: I IS) OJ rtJ ~ , I ro :1J UJ l ~ W IJ" r.Jl r..n CJI I CJJ t.l, (,'1: t,fI tJl (,'1 1 (,11 ro J-Io eJi !~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~:~ ~ :::t~ =: ~ ~ lIS) IS) .....! lSl lSl (S) lIS) lSl lSl! IS) (S) (S) 1 (S) (S) (S) ~ I tJ) IJ) (S);....:J ~ \D I \0 rJ) I,J): t..D t..LJ I.i) J \LJ ():) co · I" " 'I........ " 'I' ........ '1'- " 'i' " ....... ...... UJ ...... ..... I..... ..... .....,..... ..... ....'..... ... .... 'j...... ro f-Io ~ IS) ~ t1' I "" 0' 0' I (rt (]-I cr.1 (n tn era, '" 1..i) co ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ Cj ! ~ --.J -..J 1 ""'-J "-.I " ""'-J -....J -....J: '" -.oJ --.J I '-J " " rrl I ~ ~ z c; c; ;;:;j ;; ;; ;; ;; ;0:;5 ~ :;j;i G) n; ~ 1:"11 rn ITi' fT1 .T; ITlj ,T; fTI .-n ~ [T1 m fTll;T: rn E :D Z :z: ("1:("1 n n n n C11n ('1 nln z ~ -; :" fi1 0:0 0 0 0 0 0:0 0 OjO f71 Z f-t ::0 ;:0 0: '=' t::' t::t I '=' t::I I:::t I t::I t::t f'.::=' I tt ;tJ Cij 0 D D fT1 im m ml'" m I'll m fT'i m 1"" D" Z ;::i ~ cl;itb cl, tb1tb c.6 .;I~ ~ ~I~ ~ Gj r.n o 0 c:::;o D D D f11 010 0 010 0 r "'0 Z Z ::3:IC::O :::o~: D r'r- r- r-1r Z:"11 r en (J') 3: (j 0 ;::u r r en l (J) en (J) I to 00 :z D :"11:fTJ r rr1 ::3: 13 3 3:!3 " N "'0 " ::01 r- :I) n DID D D~D "U 0 :D r r !ttf" r- r- 0" \ao .... .. r (J') i ID D ::orD r 'Tl" W'tzI D rr1 0 INN (T1:;O 0 r :::t! IJ:I i" 1(TJ ;J1 :::0." N 0 liD D C'11" "'01:'11:::0 z~z DOlO D ("'):Z: " ie :T! 0 It::' ..... (t) iU) Z ZjZ '" :c D tt1 " .,,!m z to nOlo t::f "to" -; ;rj tTl ! (J) n r- !:i'O ;w::: z, z -< ~ tt1 :::0 == H ....... ttI rTU fT1 I-f ... ~ I" f-I .::... a 1 n :;J:,: Cf.J: n rrt I r n "1;2:1 !:to ~ h-f C1 ro :z: I ^...... I" no" 0 i::I: c:: 1 ("') ^ W r.J'J R ~ ~ ~l~ ~ 2!~ ;::j ~I^ ro I ..... ()) :ttlD ~ H=O ." IT! en ~ Ull t-: ...... m f D ." ; l~ ro ~ z IS) QlO l~ D ! I (,11 CJJ f'I1 D 1 ~ Z t:::t , ~ W i :3 : fl1 ...... fT1 ! - - - i- -. - - - - J.- - -1- - - ~ '0 . -.,. I j t;ti I i I ~ I rul CD! . . ~; J ; (S) j :. i; ; I ;- - -;- - -,- - -;- - -~- - - 'I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 i 1 i ! I tm nJ ! C..rl (..rl '. . ,is! (S) tS)CiJ . I ~ I ! I is) ...... .... . Ii) r_ll () t.r. t.1J t.lll Ii) :g Ii): ;~ ?' :- !~'1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ;S>~ ~fJ ~ ~fi I I (S) CiS IS) HSI !Sf 1St; CS) i'5) IS); (S) IS) is); : tSJ i:5) (S) I tSJ Ci) (S); tSI (S) CiJ; iSl !3) Cil. I I f j J .J " ~) I I ~ 1 d==, "U 1 1D a I ~-; (J) IfTl....; 1 J i . I-- I . i I (") , '0 I . '=' I . fi'1 1 ; I i-- I 0 I ! I! " I ! t:::' rr1 f I D :::tI , 1-1 r-f I :fT1 a I! t::! I I I ; '1- - I ; I . I : J ! I I 1:0 I i fTI J !-1 liD 11H I !r I ' I jl:::i I ,rrt I : (fJI !CJ I i:::cr I ;~ I 1-0 I '-i 11H ,10 I !:z: I I I 1 : i . I I I ! I 1:- I J 0 I . I 1 I f : I I l:::' 1fi1 I 0 ttt I ~l-t 1-1 I 1 I I ! , .- I I I I I ; i I I In IAt i . iTl 10 I . t-I l-i I ' I i - -. -....... .J ~ 'to... '" - '-" D -t rt1 .. f-Io Ci) ........ OJ -...J ........ \JJ '-I :D r) i) o ,.. ;3 OcT \ '# ,. G) rtl, z:n .1: ;}-; ~:-i ~:-' J:j I ~ r: 10 ri11 ~; t;:] ~;rrr ;ii 1" ,,~~ to e;l-t (TLD -I!! Di H\ r1 tSl J.o-Io : I j(S) IW c..'1 CiI . .~..) ,(5) :' '_I-" ;~ o t !~ ..... i I ~ W 'trl ;~ ~ro ilSl ie :...... ;fSI ,., :D CiJ f11 w 1 - J ~:'.J !J ., I::.. ' J .~ I -..: -'5 :) l:::l ' . .'l , ~ -:; ~" : "3 j .0 ~J ...;, .") ~1 -, ~ J ( ~ d .-.of D r Z' c. 3: W fi1 ;0' I f I I 1 I I , I f I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I f I I 1G:l I f :::01 , I ID f .:0 I z:n I ~(j 1t:::'C! I 'C I I~ I I I I I , I I I I f I I I I I I I I I f f I I I I I I , I I I I f , I I I I I I I I J i I I I o 11 D (1- ('j; 0: C. z: .' cri: -n I :::6: H 3: f1i. C1: II i 1 ~ I -t;--i ~O O:-i -d~ I(J') D; rl 1 I I I I I ! I I fS)iCi) , ~!~ : (S);(S) i _!_ I 1 I I ! I i I f ..L ! Ci):1SJ I (S)lG) I I \1 I t I J Ci)'1SJ tSJ:iSJ ! 1 ......:0 (S)t:'; .......n ~o coc 'Z r..U-! -...Ju -IS) ("'j...... :::01 IS) UJ (.Ii cralSf - . ro ~(S) ISlI ,..... .......13) IS) ....... l,J,) '""oJ t:::I -fTl wttf :" t-f Z.-; :" ::ottt DD ~ foo.-: a. o Z (J') -n r=- :0 :....... D ....... tt! ;tt(S) H I ("1(S) ::<::CiJ ,..... tSJi iSJ, . is! iSI. I I I :t! ::r 1:00 I-fc.n Irrl-i I I I I I In , ,0 10 1f11 i I 1 T1 ; 1:::1 !;; i:o ;s:} 1-; ...... ilTi 0 t::J ~ I :1:::1 1m I :~ I iD I 1 J.-I I,r I I I l t::I I jfi1 I . en I :(j I 1;V 11M I Iv I l-i I .I-i I ,0 I ;Z I l I ' , I I i t ! I ; I ! 1.- I ( I I I , I ! I i I : , '0 I 1 fTt I 'tti f 'f-f f !-i f I f . t : I I I j- I I I r I ~ I I ~ I i I . I ~ ("") i !A! f 'JT1 110 I '1-1 1 l--! t I 1 t:t D -f ITl II :-a. fS: "- ro ~ ....... \D -...J ;:0 n f) o S Ci- := .. I I G)i n1: In rrlr-f AI~ D =z~ I, e r :cri m: OJ Gjrr; m:" "H o ~H 'f!!) ..J~ i \at D~ I-fl rj 1 I I j ,fSl ...... [ J .(S) 'w 't.lJ (S) . ro (S) ;1 J-&. ~ , I lei) ! ...... i~ UJ t.1l (S) 'I !ro ~ i:" ;lSf 1 1J :0 G') fT1 I ;-. , - -~J-~\I __-,,:,,!:. .J -); - ) :' I .., ; 1 ,:) :l . f' _, ~---'- - l~ I JS,;!S)(SJJ:) I : - 10 I ' UlWwC; I I D l~ I ',,,n I to \:! ~ f roro.....o 1;:0 0 !T1 'r I CJJ CJl CD: c: I :~ (J) Iz I ' " " ......., Z I :fT'1 -; ! yj...o~-; f ! i-&o Ie I - -....J--...J-..J.. f IS) I~ I I " I IX! i 1__ ___ _4 Ci) 1,- - ro 1m I in n c; .... I ' ~ I" I I l::tl :::0 AI ~ I I in " I , is) 110 \,I) lO f ! ~ ..... ..... W I :~ -..J j-n f . era ..... :-&0- (..i= 1:(11 lD I : I~ ~~, 5) I - I : . 1'- - jR f : ro I . I I rSI IS) IS)' fSl I ; ,0 I I tll W w. . I ; 'U I~ I '" fS1 I jt:.1 m I UJ ro f-o&o' Ci) f 1::0 ::I:t I CSJeDt..i) I ,-I !-I 1(1) i " ,,- I "'1" a , \JJt.JJ'J) Ci) I 1 ~ Gll "'0 I "'-.f......-...J m I i 'D -;0 I ' i Z I : n ,m. t-f I l fG; G) C; rrl 1:- - or) :z I : ;v I ! :0 In -i , ' I~ ~~. ~ I , -- m , I I ! ::i ~~ t::I f . G) rT1 iii :", !-f I I 'C't In I l;tl ;tl ;tl 0 I - != :\i~ I ~ ^' D :0 :0, Z II'=' I : ~-I~ 00, I . rrl :.. D-< I ;D IS E B I !--i W I ! D " f 1::0 ;(S) r! IIZ n zzz r I~ - ...... I : n 100 (I) D fIr ! I .. t :!:::I 0 "n N I ; 1(S) L: I I c: " r ,,' D I I I::j lttoJ -~ I ! z .- D- I t 1m i :Ii DND t.f'! I ' -; '=' I icn ~~ :~! , : NDN 0 I J ("") !. , ;-i ~ D'D: Z I ~:::o ro v~ , f 0 ,n I D IlH t(S) '~ : jO :6 en r 0, -; I I"U i~ ~rr; HOO i-! I !-i I -ir Cj (j Z' 0 I I f-f .(5) ;T; N I en Z;:":D' z 110 I D ~, (J) : IZ i I hH I tJ:I ..... I I r' 0 0 , I lIS) C ~ I! z, f ' , ..... I I I i . I O~ I . I t 51 I : I t:f I . ,ts.; m:D I : I rrt I : .t.n I > ! 1- - - fXt 11- .(5) ~~ I : ~ I ; il i ! -! I : :ro :0: 1 : j I : itS) I I 'W I i II I-ti t . I I ::0 I : 'IS) I I ' r- I ; ;(S) r; , I 1 .. f 1 t:.1 I I i I m I I ; 1 tt:t I I I :...... I : (S) Ci) f I . """"! I . . . I I . I · (S) IS! I 1 i G)CiJ i I , : I I 1 I_- I - -- I I- I f J , f I f 1 I : I I : 1 ; J I : , - I ~ I : , i I . I ~ "'0 1 I ' (S) I D t I r.,Qu) I ' (.'1 W ,(SJ f (J G') I ," ... I ; ... ... I A:t m f : (S) IS) :1:; ~~: I f11 I ;ro ro 1'0 I . t.F1 ~11 I i Ci) (5) err i f-f I .. . I ;. · · I -i I ;0' err I J~ IS) 0"'1 I ' ..... ~ :(:0 Q:1 I j (S) (S) co I I I ! I ( ~ ~ Ii i ~ u, ~ 0. ~ =>0) 55 c ~ 6 << il CL T<< ~ ij .f:gi co ] ~.- l5 m.9- ~ w! 6~ ~ as'; f6~ j -l - t: ~ ffii alS ~~ ~I _!~ i!i ~ J ~o. i '3 I~ 'g ilJ Iff :u ~J u. ~ I !i G) <: ~ gti ~ I l(( (3 !i ~ ~l ~o: 0- ~ g' o.u, 6 :c: i! en Q. E z ~ t 0 1;'5- 'Be ~Ew j "-"- !i Vl- Ow .! 6 oZS ~ ~ -g> ~~~ a. II; ;g S ~ ~- t 1 ~ Ji ~ :i ~ ~ ii~ q:: ] GJ .5 -i Om u.. M i5 "i i i Ol ... ~ ju m~ 6 .j := ~i 0 if rG U. r. ::J~ ,~ I _....J ~ ~ ~ e: ~i~ ~ Q !~ ~ol5 16 :0 ....~ i~ -e~ li~ ~ 'Ii E ~ i ~ ~10~ ~ ~u if cnQ.. _C/) (I) cE~ w ~c:> I I ESli Q,) i > 11(. Q) (/J .tij ~co n:E )~f c a.. ex) 0 0 0 GJ 0 0 co 0 1< "- i -.:i- ..t -tti ~ lri cO rO cO i6~ GJ ~ in ~ ml 'it .8 > glD~ j! ~ It trs ~ .~ 1: . U1 ~ ~ E il~ GJ en ; et? ~ ,. i 8 I~~ (0 0> N 1.0 ...... to '" ~ It t~1 u:cvi ~ M ~ ~ ..,f ui u:i .::;10 ffi .~ .5 :a 0.1 :s U'J to ~ ~ UJ e.- Q.I () i~ i::5co th- ~ ~~ o n oti .~ ~ 2! (tJ~ i~ .E ~ S >. ... 0 g:e ~ I ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~ ~ ~ 'Ci) i ._ "C 8 cu:"'O C/) - tG ~ ~ g !~ ~ $e 'i~dj~ ..Q QI ~ o~~ i i ~ tri' ji~ C'3 ... 1': i !1 1GE ~ c .- o ::J ~ - it l~~1 en i ~ T- ~ tR. ~ 64 ~ m ... 1~ ... ~ ~ c: to d'i.8 !iim o E Q ii~ ~ .~ ~ . . ...... ~~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ !I >t ~ nI .- iii~ "Q1; :e re ~ ct' t;S ~ ~ ~ ~i th () a.. N 10 ~!E LL. _LLJ ......'t5 6~ :3"8 0 ~ ~U).. g~~1 ~E ~ m" m m g ..... ~ U') ~ t ... fa,! - 0 CI) .- 1n~ >~ ~ ~ i~ g l~ ~-o~~ 8E U T- ~ C\I N ):: I- 8~.!:<( .. 8- <U - g "0 c z c 0 ii' ~ ~:?i' ~Wi ~ ~ 0.. ~ ~ ~ }~~ u: 2- 1:; 0) i~ ~ ~ 5~~ .~ ~ . ~~ [~ ~ ~ ~ ~&~ ~}"& 0- . '5 ~ ~%& ~ & .9 ~ [~ ~ 2 ~ ~ >( <'.i (I) 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E a. .- ~ q ~ 1r.i ro ~ [ w !t~~q: c ~C\4~ Q :i t") c-.i '3 co 8 n. 1:: c; r:: m ~ z <<) Q) C'O C -I (ij ~ t: t: a:: ~ ~ Q) :::l :::l ~ ('0 1 u z 0 () a: j Q :t ~ ~ ffi :e ~ o 8: ~ ..... :e~ ~Q: ~~ (1)0 >- ~ ~ CI) Q: ~ ~ =2: S e ffi :e u.. o ~ (3 E~ 2~-g ~~E eno ~ :;:;~ &~E ~i3 ~ <1> ~Ol o E U5 E:5-o u: ~ OlE c;)ro -0 L... :J'U o c ICO-g 76~E ~O >'-0 co c: Oro"& ~ ~ E ~o >''''0 m c Oco-g ~~E <(0 If) "E (1) E Q) > o C. E ~ -s ~ .c o en :rg '5. ti co 0 ot) ~ c "Q "E ro~ ~.~ ~~ ~UJ -.::t M "l"""" lO ci lO o 0> N "l"""" (J) o "l"""" N r---: (J) N 01 @ 8 I"'--- "l"""" d z m s: ..q M "l"""" t,() 6 1.0 o 0) C\i "l"""" 1.0 C\i "l"""" Ct) o:j (i) M o o o 0- eo f;f} Q) en :J o .e a. E :J a.. I"'--- "l"""" "l"""" ~ d ~ z 6. ~ '5 ~ 5. C: a.. N Q) o m C'\I Q) 0=: ~ ~ ~ c v W 0 cD s: ~ 0:: 01 en ~ ~ :v ~ =c ti .e o 8 a. D co E N oCj ~ oCj L... (J) (J) '0 "l"""" "l"""" C: ~ ro- ~ ro "l"""" Q) "l"""" d 0:: d Z af Z !!!. ~ !!!. ID 0 ID ~ .c s: d z Q) ~ m ..0 "l"""" "l"""" cO "l"""" 1.0 o 1.0 o 1.0 o 1.0 o -q- ..0 "l"""" co r---: "l"""" C"') ..q. "l"""" m ..0 "l"""" eo 0> <0 o "l"""" ro M N -q: a o o 0- o C'\I f;f} a a a ci C"') 1.O~ ,.... W [:- -- ~~- -<-+ r+.....r ':: ~ __jLi_ ~..,- 'I~_ ~~_~ 00 ~.'-';:..ob 00 ,~,"~'8- 00 <,-,~:.~.'.Q. 0' 8 > ~ ^ ~ g ~':_: ~:~r~ N~ ~~f~CO~ ~}~:: c\i <<i~:_~ ~ ~..~ ~ []~ N ~:? N ~'; 1;-~7::~t "':,'} >->! 0':6 ~;F~.c,...~,lO~ ~Hil ~-,;.-'....:_;~co. .~ "F~~ ~~B MN .f_~~' .......'.j- ~ ~ . ",,"~r.~ ~_~~_:. :.tt~ >".?:r, -r~;' ':':'~J~.' m >- lO (J) m "l"""" co m 0> ,.... I"'--- en m "l"""" ro m en "l"""" ..q <ri C'\I t,() ~ 1.O C\i ~ N I"'--- r---: "l"""" CC! "l"""" ,.... I"'--- ~ o o o LO- LO LO f;f} en 0> 0> ,.... -If) a. ~ Q) UJ o ? .9 Q) ~ N ,.... '0 ~ E cD c o ..q cD C'\I LO -q: LO C\i ~ N co 0> 'l"'"" "l"""" M "l"""" N a.O a o o ci N N f;f} o o o N ~ o o o ('t) UJ Q) C ~ N ,.... u c Q) X w N o z ID s: LO cri N l.O ..q. LO C\i o -.:i N ~ N "l"""" -.:i "l"""" I"'--- r.O o o o ci t- 'V f;f} o o N ~ o o ('t) 1.0 ~ C ~ N "l"""" "U C Q) X w 1.0 a) N U) ~ 1O N o .q: N ro ~ C'\I lO cD ,.... co cD o o o N- N f;f} .i:~.;.~' =- :~~ :~:'~~~ gSt8 g;'sg o "(0 ''It' :>'(") ~t!~ ~~..~ '__::..c~~~ ('t) 1.0 o 0 o 0 N N N N o z ID ~ ,..... ci ('t) LO ~ LO N N cD N co ~ C\l 1.0 a) "l"""" ..q ~ o o o ci LO ('t) f;f} i_-~:~~,'.: I ..j..~: ~ . ~~ ~~. ~ .=.~ ('t) N o Z Q) ~ "l"""" M ('t) 1.0 ...t 1.0 N c:o a) N 1.0 N ('t) ": N ,..... cO o o o ci 1.0 M f;f} ~(I ~tl ~ CD 0 o ,.... o 0 N N v C'\I o Z Q) ~ ('t) r.O ('t) 1.0 -.:i 1.0 C\i co o ('t) ro M ('t) 1.0 C\i C'\I o 0> o o o ci 1.0 ('t) f;f} >. co =E c o UJ !~ UJC\I c-LO o 0 . =L..."l"""" roo_ ~"Q:: LO-.8 "l"""" tn v Q) .S: ~ .0 ~ C) .9 m.s "'0 a. ~ Q) >< m E 0 a. ::J 0 >< ~<(o co-oo -oc:2 c co . ~ mE"U EQ)C Q) 0 co o >. ~ ~~o oE:J (J):JO ~EI :v "~ 76 ~~~ o o a 1"'---- 0> N -.q-- f;f) OlOlO LO . . "l""""N"l"""" II II II 000 OO::I: <(~a.. "S ~ UJ UJ~~ Q)Q).... :J~~ ~.cQ) .... 0 -0;:0 Q) 0 co "UL...(J) ~(9.o UJ .- 0) ffi ';: .S 0: ~ ~ .~ .a a.~:g .... Q) Q) ~~ ~ a.c..Q) "CErn <DO:!::: E () g. m~t) ~~a> L... > .m-g~ co ro 2: ~ t: CD m5:~ :=: '- 0 L... CD Q) .900.0 -g ~ ~ ~ E E ~"*-g o >. ro :5enmai ~Q;1ii.g, m 10 L... .- :2~:5~ ol.O~'- .oCD~co eo> OIUJ .- ,- .... .2 ~ .5 ffi ~ ~~ ~~ tt=UJ....~ C ::J ~ L... :8~ca1~ moL... L... -S.eQ)::J a.;:02 &.ij;$~ en E Q) ti " >. E UJ <D C .... 0 UJ.- >,.... UJ frl c'+"- o .5 :;:;UJ :J .- .c'U E~ UJ .... .- C "'CQ) '00 ffia. Q)~ tnUJ m Q) ...."0 o CO 000> ~g- Q.E ::J Q) UJ.... :u~ ....If) to_ :=: CO 'OE 5 g "en -' c: C m Q) ~E Q) ~ .em :!:::c.. ~ ~ -go. IQ~ go. ~.E CO UJ Q).... If) ~ ~v ....0) >. "'0 - :J c- O v Q).5 -go oS::: c 0 .- "C ~~ o L... V :J - C) $tt= "g. ~ 00 ~ .!!l ><; ! c:: o I ~ :9 o oj o "2: Q) UJ '0 :i o Q) ;: >. a. a. :J If) m e> .!Q :5 ";: UJ ~ '0 co a. co v C) c: "0. E :J a. Q) ;: '0 E ::J UJ UJ co ~ co "S o ro v ~ "0 co a. m v E u: Q) "2: i aj f? ::J o .e N "l"""" .5 -g CD .~ Q) "0 Q) .c c co o ~ t: 2 Q) 01 ~ o C;; 01 E-- ~~ _"0 o L... Q) :J E2 ~v ON >(j) ~ ~ :;:;0 c:.c <DN UJ,- Q) - E- ::J Q) m~ ~~ co~ o ffi C;;.... Q) II > Q) :;:;0) &~ UJti e ~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: NOVEMBER 5. 1997 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER: 18 REQUEST: CANVASSING THE VOTES FOR CITY GENERAL ELECTION AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLice OEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING OEPT: /}jlbfr ~1 ~!2 .}J ,[~ - frO f-. ()~ J c~~ tiP 1 re-P Or MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Results from the City of Meridian General Election November 4, 1997 For COUNCIL MEMBER Seat #2 #800 Four Year Term #801 #802 Total Ron L. Anderson . . 279 131 433 843 Tammy L. deWeerd . . 212 124 414 750 John Berg 1 1 Bill Nary .~~/_2_ 411 2-tSb g4q l~q6 For COUNCIL MEMBER Seat #4 #800 #801 #802 Total Four Year Term Ronald Keith Bird 212 122 303 637 Dorothy J. Hook . 104 56 200 360 Ronald Louis Vogt 198 76 336 610 Grant Kingsford . 1 1 Grant Jones 1 1 ~~ ----- ---- 6/~ 265 fJ9q 1601 ( ITEM NUMBER: 19 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DJRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING OEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS OVV tufpY ( DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR 11/12/97 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a Pre-determination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday NOVEMBER 5, 1997 before the Mayor and the City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill in delinquent. You may retain council. This service will be discontinued on NOVEMBER 12,1997 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest their water, sewer and trash delinquency? No response. MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off The amount of the turn off list is $56,762 26 RECEIVED NOV - 5 1997 tTfY OF ME"JDIAN ITEM NUMBER: 20 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING OEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS PriJvJJ !lJP ( \ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5,1997 -7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROLL CALL: X WALT MORROW IGLENN BENTLEY +MAYOR ROBERT CORRIE MINUTES OF MEETING HELD OCTOBER 21,1997: djP/rove..- X CHARLIE ROUNTREE X RON TOLSMA , 1. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR ASHFORD '~REENS SUBDIVISION BY BRIGHTON CORPORATION: ft~ ~ Me. zlf/t> ~ 2. TABLED OCTOBER 21,. 1997: ORDINANCE #760 - COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, COMMITTEES: tZjJjJl^tJv..e ?<JIM t:lrneh..~ec{ FeA--I-Rh c.L />L- . f.eC~/D-A- +-1194- 3. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #761 - TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION: tZ-j/jJl-o v.e- 4. TABLED OCTOBER 21,1997: ORDINANCE #775 - VACATION OF GENTRY WAY: approv€- 5. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: ORDINANCE #776 - BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: apfJh9ViZ..- 6. TABLED OCTOBER 21,1997: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR TURNBERRY SUBDIVISION BY BENCHMARK LAND CO.: tLPf7~ov..e.. 7. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TURNBERRY SUBDIVISION BY BENCHMARK LAND CO.: a-ppiY)v..e... 8. TABLED OCTOBER 21,1997: ORDINANCE #779 - TREE ORDINANCE: ~b-ee ~t 7 A/ov. /8 f1- 1nf-7 9. TABLED OCTOBER 21, 1997: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE REQUIREMENT TO TILE THE SAFFORD LATERAL BY GOLFVIEW ASSOCIATES UMITED PARTNERSHIP: ~/r.f Ii (JI-I-~ til-t't7rYAey t-o "orepa r.e.. .-f/-r- t t! L 10. RESOLUTION #167 - \f/ATER AVERAGING RESOLUTION: Cipprov<.- 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 11. PUBUC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ESPRESSO SHOP TO SELL PASTRIES, SANDWICHES, SOUP, ETC. BY SHARLA LANPHEAR - MERIDIAN OFFICE AND Cp_~VENTION CENTER: ~jJjJr(}v-e... ~/F telL tZ/lprov-€/ cteCIJ/~ PUBUC.' HEARING: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SETBACK REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW SECOND FLOOR TO EXTEND 3 % FEET INTO SETBACK BY SCOTT REECE - 2311 N._HYDE AVENUE: e;f-:i a-~ -tv pr€;ft1-1.Z -/!,c {elL PUBUC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 8.5 ACRES TO C-G AND R-2 BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: e:Ef1fJTtv.e dl?1na.€<<' -7/.tc I elL tz-,/:J,pnve deelY/en.- eJh; Cl-l-~.7 -/v fJ"UlnvLe P'rdlh.4Y1Ge..-- PUBUC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ECONO LUBE SUBDIVISION BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: ~~ ~~'/ #t7r.r. / 81-i:: h-/;?- PUBUC HEARING: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ECONO LUBE N'TUNE AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE AND LIGHT REPAIR FACILITY AND SCHUCK'S AUTOMOBILE PARTS STORE BY ECONO LUBE N'TUNE INC. - EAST OF LOCUST GROVE, SOUTH SIDE OF E. FAIRVIEW: .' / ~ kL -ratree tv1-VbZ Ntlt./.- If} -/U, ,'J RON VAN AUKER: DISCUSSION OF LAND TO EAST OF FUTURE MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE: (htZtftrVl 5~S: / 61V?!fJ: ':10 -hz-ek wi#~ FARM LAND LEASE WITH KENNETH ASCHENBRENNER: c?/j//t)v<,-, CANVASSING THE VOTES FOR CITY GENERAL ELECTION: d:-;:;p ro v -e.- WA TERlSEWERlTRASH DELINQUENCIES: d-f/'pro V ~ APPROVE BILLS: a~pr{)v~ DEPARTMENT REPORTS: A. SHARI STILES, PLANNING & ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: 1. MERIDIAN AUTOMOTIVE - UPRR RIGHT OF WAY: 2. HUBCAP HEAVEN IN NAPA AUTO PARTS STORE: 3. WASHINGTON STREET DEDICATION TO CITY (ELVIRA SUBDIVISION): 12. 13. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 1fL7 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, CHANGING THE BEGINNING OF THE AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL WATER USE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 15, 1997 TO NOVEMBER 15, 1997, FOR PURPOSES OF ASSESSING SEWER USER CHARGES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 7-533 of the Sewer Use Ordinance of the City of Meridian establishes an average residential water use period beginning October 15 and ending March 15 of the following year; WHEREAS, Section 7-533 of the Sewer Use Ordinance of the City of Meridian grants the Mayor and City Council authority to change, by a duly acted resolution, the beginning of the average residential water use period from October 15 to November 15 for any particular year; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the Mayor and City Council hereby change the beginning of the average residential water use period from October 15, 1997 to November 15, 1997. PASSED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 5+11 day of ;1!ovehu , 1997. WATER USE PERIOD RESOLUTION PAGE 1 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: NOVEMBER 5~ 1997 APPLICANT: ITEM NUMBER: 17 REQUEST: FARM LAND LEASE WITH KENNETH ASCHENBRENNER AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. COMMENTS OVV o;pp1 FARM LAND LEASE Parties: City of Meridian - Lessor Kenneth L. Aschenbrenner - Lessee 4'~o V\. W\evIGt~ ~. Lessor owns the following described real property and hereby leases 53 acres of said property to Lessee: the E. % of the S.W. % of the S.E. % Section 36, T4N, R1W, Boise Meridian and the S.E. % of the S.E. % of Section 36 T4N, R1W Boise Meridian, excepting the building site in the S.E. comer of property, and the site of the water reservoir and facilities. 1. This lease shall begin on August 1, 1997, and shall terminate on November 1, 1998. Lessee shall pay the Lessor $5,500.00 to be paid by November 1, 1998. 2. Lessee shall pay all expenses of planting, growing, and harvesting of all crops . grown on said land. 3. Lessor shall pay all property taxes and irrigation water assessments. 4. Lessee shall pay electric bill on irrigation well. 5. Lessee provides for his own insurance needs, including liability and worker's compensation. Signed: /) Lessee /LI,d2 f.,~~.. - Mayor --- 7uv-. 1, Lfq1 ()~f ~ 0 fQtf? OFFICIALS HUB OF TREASURE VAUEY A Good Place to Live COUNCIL MEMBERS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk JANICE L. SMITH, City Treasurer GARY D. SMITH, P.E.. City Engineer B~UCE D. STUARl: Water Works Supt. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Parks Supt. SHARI L. STILES, P & Z Administrator PATlY A. WOLFKIEL, DMV Supervisor KENNETH W. BOWERS, Fire Chief W.L. llBILL" GORDON, Police Chief ' WAYNE G. CROOKSTON, JR.. Attorney CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 · FAX (208) 887-4813 Public Works/Building Department (208) 887-2211 Motor VehicIe/Drivers License (208) 888-4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor P & Z COMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMITH November II, 1997 Mr. Kenneth L Aschenbrenner 4990 N. Meridiem Road Meridiem, Idaho 83642 HE: FARM lAND LEASE N.W. CORNER USTICK AND MERIDIAN ROADS Dear Mr. Aschenbrenner: Here is an original executed farrnlcmd lease for your records for the city owned property described in the lease. Sincerely, J!~~~~ William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk Cc: File, G.Smith Meridian City Council November 5, 1997 Page 29 Boise City Limits (inaudible) from the stand point of Van Auker (inaudible) they need to understand that is my position (inaudible). Rountree: I am 'not sympathetic to. their issue, I will listen to them but I don't know that they can build a very good case (inaudible). Corrie: This was just for a discussion so if you don't want to hear a discussion you certainly don't have to. Morrow: Well I guess from my perspective I am perfectly willing to have to Shari and Gary and myself meet with the Van Auker folk and express my sentiments (inaudible). Corrie: Okay, we will take care of that if you so desire to have (inaudible) come in and see us. Stiles: Gary and I did meet with Brad Miller and Gale Jenson and even though my attitude was not a chance in hell they thought that my belligerent attitude was not going to be the same as the Council. So that is why they wanted the audience. Corrie: If you want me to come in there I would be happy to meet with them. Gary and I can soothe the savage beast (inaudible). Make a time and we will have a meeting with them. ITEM #17: FARM LAND LEASE WITH KENNETH ASCHENBRENNER: Corrie: I believe you have that before you, any questions of staff or questions you might have on this lease at this point for November 1, 1998. Morrow: I have none Mr. Mayor, this is basically the same standard lease that we have done. I think that the legal description outlines the property that he is leasing, the terms are the same t."1at they have been before. We earlier had assured Mr. Aschenbrenner that he would have a lease if he had gone ahead and prepped for sugar beets consistent with normal farming practices for that. So I would move that we enter into this contract with Mr. Aschenbrenner, authorizing the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. '\. Bentley: Second Corrie: Motion made and seconded to enter into this agreement as written with the mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest, any further discussion? All those in favor? Opposed? MOTION CARRIED: All Yea ITEM #18: CANVASSING VOTES FOR CITY GENERAL ELECTION: -..,.-. CITY OF MERIDIAN ."Hub of Treasure Valley" 33 E. Idaho Meridian. Idaho 83842 888-4433 v Customer's Order No. Date / 19 Name Address SOLD BY PAID au T . I ~7 jfl-f ~ 006585 by this bill. TAX TOTAL ,yfoCJ ~ to GS.207.2 I ~9J&w ~IllINTEO IN u.s."'. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this }/~ day of September, 1995, by and between JOHN V. OTTER and JUNE S. OTTER, Co-Trustees of the JOHN V. and JUNE S. OTTER TRUST under Trust Agreement dated October 8, 1991, parties of the first part, hereinafter called "Sellers", and the CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, a municipal corporation of the state of Idaho, party of the second part, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer", WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, Sellers are the owners . . of certain r-eal property situated in Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full, and have agreed to sell the real property to Buyer; and WHEREAS, Buyer has agreed to purchase Sellers' above described real property; and WHEREAS, irrigation water is provided to the property owned by Sellers by the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District, which acts as agent for the United .states Bureau of Reclamation; and WHEREAS, either the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District or the United states Bureau of ReClamation, or both, have notified Sellers as the landholder with the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District, that Sellers have been assessed compensation charges because, allegedly, Sellers received project water without proper .. . forms on file complying with the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982; and WHEREAS, Sellers have protested this assessment; and WHEREAS, Buyer has no present knowledge, information or interest in the assessment and desires not to be involved in it whatsoever; and WHEREAS, Sellers have tenants which have leased the agricultural portion of the property who have their own well equipment on the property and another tenant that has leased the house on a month-to-month basis for a period of years; and WHEREAS, Sellers have personal property stored in some of the outbuildings on the property, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE SELLERS AND BUYER AS FOLLOWS: 1. Sellers shall pay the alleged assessment due in the full amount that is claimed by the United states Bureau of Reclamation or the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District, and Sellers will pay all costs and expenses related thereto, including any attorneys fees, costs and interest assessed at the time of closing of the sale, and shall be" responsible for and" shall pay any further assessments which arise, or arose, during the time that Sellers owned the real property. Additionally, Sellers shall indemnify Buyer for all expenses, costs, or attorneys fees that Buyer may incur that relate to the time period that Sellers owned the real property. \ . 2. That the City of Meridian will be the owner of the property after the closing of the sale between the Sellers and the Buyer, and in the event that the United states Bureau of Reclamation or the Nampa and. Meridi'an irrigation District refunds any portion of the assessment that has been paid by Sellers, Buyer shall forward any sum received form the United states Bureau of Reclamation or the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District to Sellers within twenty (20) days of receipt thereof. Further, Buyar shall be responsible for, and pay all Bureau of Reclamation or . Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District. assessments and water charges which are made against the real property afte~ the date of closing. 3. That it is understood between the parties hereto that Kenneth L. Aschenbrenner and Sharon Aschenbrenner, husband and wife, are the owners of the irrigation pump, including the switch gear, piping, fertilizer tank and all other appurtenances relating to the irrigation well on the premises and that it is not Sellers, and that their lease is being assigned to Buyer. 4. That it is further understood between the parties that the Sellers have certain personal property' stored in some of the outbuildings on the premises. It is agreed that the Sellers shall have until March 1, 1996, to remove all of the said personal proper~y from the premises. 5. That it is understood that Owen Bartlett, a single man, is presently leasing, on a .onth to month basis, the house and , ' outbuilding on the premises. It is agreed that Owen Bartlett has the right to continue leasing said house, as he has in the past. DATED: This ;Z~~day of September, 1995. SELLERS: Q N V. the HN V. and JUNE S. OTTER TRUST dated October 8, 1991 . ~-.uJ~ &tiNE S. OTTER, Trustee-of the JOHN .V. and JUNE S. OTTER TRUST dated October 8, 199~ BUYER: CITY OF MERIDIAN B GM T P. KINGSFO CITY OF MERIDIAN ByJf~~~ ~. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR , C ty Clerk of the CITY OF MERIDIAN STATE OF IDAHO ) : ss. County of Ada ) On this 2bd day of September, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared JOHN V. OTTER and JUNE S. OTTER, husband and wife, known to me to be the Trustees of the JOHN V. and JUNE.S. OTTER TRUST, and known to me to be the persons who executed this instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Not Public for Idaho Re .tling at Boise, Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-/7-'11 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) 55. County of Ada ) On this 2~C( day of September, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared GRANT P. KINGSFORD and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and ci ty Clerk respectively of the ci ty of Meridian, Idaho, who executed this instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. PUbl>3 for Idaho iding at '- ~, Idaho Commission Expires: 3""" 7-9f .4( .'t.. .~.II'~"''' ......... _._._.... I · EXHIBIT "A" - File Number: P141665 I I .' PARCEL 1: THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OFTHE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (E1/2SW1/4SE1/4) OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, B.M;; PARCEL 2: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1 /4SE1 /4) OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, S.M., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING PARCEL SOLD TO M.A. REGAN: BEGINNING AT A STONE SET BY e.c. STEVENSON, COUNTY SURVEYOR, AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SE1 /4SE1 /4 OF SAID SECTION 36, RUNNING THENCE WEST A DISTANCE OF 743 FEET, THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 201 FEET, THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 743 FEEf, THENCE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 201 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED lNTHE SE1/4 SE1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, S.M. (BEING A PO"RTION OFTHE EXCEPTED PARCEL REFERRED TO IN THE DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL 2 ABOVE), MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:' BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4SE1/4) OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST. 8.M., FROM WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID SE1/4SE1 /4, A STONE, BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 53' EAST 460 FEET DISTANT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53' WEST. 283 FEET ALONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF THE SAID SE1/4SE1/4; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 201 FEET; THENCE NORTH B9 DEGREES 53' EAST, 283 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH BOUNDARY OFTHE SAID SE1 /4SE1 /4; THENCE NORTH, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 201 FEET TO THE PLACE O.F BEGINNING. '., EXCEPT FROM SAID PARCEL 2 THAT PORTION CONVEYeD TO ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT FOR PUBUC RIGHT-OF-WAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER INSTRUMENT NO. 9127819. AND EXCEPT ANY OTHER PORTION OF SAID PARCELS 1,2 AND 3 LYING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR MERIDIAN AND USTJCK ROADS. END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ( ~ '" ASSIGNMENT OF REAL PROPERTY LEASE THIS ASSIGNMENT, Made and. entered into this ,,1 t 4 day of September, 1995, by and between JOHN V. OTTER and JUNE S. OTTER, as Co-Trustees of the JOHN V. and JUNE S. OTTER TRUST under Trust Agreement dated October 8, 1991, hereinafter referred to as "Assignor", and the CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, a municipal corporation of the state of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "Assignee", FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Assignor does hereby sell, transfer, set over, and assign unto Assignee, all of Assignor's right, title and interest in and to that certain REAL PROPERTY LEASE, dated September 12, 1978, as extended, and all proceeds therefrom, executed by KENNETH L. ASCHENBRENNER and SHARON ASCHENBRENNER, husband and wife, in favor of Assignor, This Assignment shall be effecti ve as of the ,:21 ~ay of September, 1995. This Assignment shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Assignors'. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor hereto has executed this Assignment on the day and year first above written. ASSIGNOR: N V. the N V. and JUNE S. OTTER TRUST dated October 8, 1991 Q ~~-</ J Q .z:t;;t.J J~E S. OTTER, Trustee of the JOHN V. and JUNE S. OTTER TRUST dated October 8, 1991 . · I ASSIGNEE: "'~ CITY OF MERIDIAN B P. KINGSF R , OF MERIDIAN BYwd~~~~y Clerk of the CITY OF MERIDIAN STATE OF IDAHO ) : 55. County of Ada ) On this ~ tI. day of September, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared JOHN V. OTTER and JUNE S. OTTER, husband and wife, known to me to be the Trustees of the JOHN V. and JUNE S. OTTER TRUST, and known to me to be the persons who executed this instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ~ y ch Y PUblic for Idaho ding at Boise,.. Idaho Commission Expires: 3-/7- if? STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada -tI.. ) On this ~~ day of September, 1995, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for" said state, personally appeared GRANT P. KINGSFORD and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the }-layor and ci ty Clerk respecti vely of the ci ty of Meridian, Idaho, who executed this instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in · certificate first above written. PUbli~~ Idaho at ( , Idaho Expires: 3-1 7- '7' ., ,. ( ~~.Eji L Pl{( ".Il'?, {'J: Y L~-:!\ BE (Ba t \':e ell ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ll.II D ( ( ( ( ( Y' . J(>l:ii'.f V. O'l1'IIEl{ JUI ~E S. O'l\TBR hUGb;.nd and \'life 906 I!t'tlritCJn l~o'nd Boise, Iutlho b37()4 LESSOnS, 1m! J1"~rl'iI L. /1.SC IP~!.T"E RT:i!l.rER Sli;~l~Ol' l... .C::C hEI'E ~.~Elrin~~ 11 U G 1;. t'.n tl ;:.11 J. \':i fa 1205 rJ. Jr;~.nL:lill' i1()~od i.lcridi;:\n, I~uho LESS~-;:S .. ~ · I /.t THTS':'~A.GRF.E ~J!T, t-hde and entl,red into this /:.1- day r)f SC!1tel:\ber I 1978, by and bety.-een time: v. OTT'ER and JUlIE S. OT'.rER, husb<.~nd. anI. wife, of Boise, l~un. Cottnty,.'I.~cdlO, hereinafter referr.ed to aE If Lessors" , and i-le~idia11, Id~ho, 11ereinafter referred to as "Lessees.lI ... KEl!11ETlI L. J~SCJi~i~::tElr!:ER ctnd S!!li.R()ll ASC~!~r":B~1Ei:t~~~'1 11lisb~;..n:d and \..'ife, of _ w ~~ !!.!!1i~.2.2~~1! "0, . . ;.'~ :.:' :. to.. . . .': '; .' ~... : 0 ':', .. '",,'" I · .... . .. Lessors, for [md in consideration of t.he cOVenr~!lts. und Clt.:;reeLJSllt"S hereinafter set forth un the part of the Lessees to be kept and per- formed, do l1er,:o,y lease to tile Lessees tIle follor,-ing-described premises situated in Ada Cuunty, state of Idaho, to wit: TIle EE\ut l!ali of tlle SOlltll\'lest Quart~r of the Soutllertst C)ur:\I~ter of See tiOll ..-:.6, ~\o1:Ilsll:"p It !Jorth 'qf !~a.n[;e 1 ':le st, Boise ~ie'ri di~n, in t1.da C(';ttnt~:.r, Idl:l1~~ and the ~olltlle:'st QUL...rt.er of tl":~ Sf)U t11east r'uartp- ''''1":'' t":e""-:,,; ."n 'z.6 rO:O'''lle'iin 4 f.lcr~l' u"'n"c 1 ~:reC"'!t ~!"'J..- se 'c:t .... v..' - v_,~ ." , ... .. ...... _ ... ......., ..._.. 1..0 '1..:..;.1, ..l_ Ivleridian, :S):CEPT~G tlleI'efrOl:l 2-1/2 acres uf lUlld in' otol':e i.Jorth- east eO!'lter, EXCEPT di ten ,\nd road rit=..11ts-of.-\t;c..y and. '.E;{C.EPTII.~G and RESEi~V1I;G: Residence ::,nd cldjaccnt outb\lildin[;s, inclLtdinr~' h::l.rn, bunldlollse, g~rc.(-;e and SilOp, a.nd f:ttrroundi11e; Grounds in the Southee:..st Corner of t~e property \'Jhicll is nepLtrately irrie;atcd fl"om 'che farla lC:l.nds'. q.itches. -1- 1. fl\~[ti'I ~jlj' L]~J\~:i~: 'l'hin lOCloe i~ for l~~c !),':riod ...)f one (1) yo ar u c ginllin C on t he It.: t uoy 0 f De c e:~ll) c r , 1 ~)7[J, L:.lld e !1l1in!.. on t 11 c 30th dU7{ of I.!oVL'I;\b or, 19'/~!. 2. Tj!E LES.SEES f~(jREE :..5 FOLL01::S: a. To pc.lY to tire Lo f.: Bor S the f.: uJn :J i ~):3 t 1!:0. DC) c .:.\[~h r qn t for said rretliGcG, s~id rentc:l.l to be paid on or uefore Dec. 1, 1')?9. bo rl'hnt t~.:(.~y "ill opr:ra.te the fr.r:J in c..n efficient t"1.nd h usb .:.~n o-lil::e ':: C'.Y t d'Ji n r: 1) l o\'!in i~ t see d :'-:-: r; t C,111 t i V::t tin r: o.n d harvc.s"tinc; in D. r!~nner tl~.~t \'!ill concerve t: e "[.>~opcrty. c. .. T 11 t:l t ~. 1,,! e:y t?i.ll l1. -:: '.~ d j ~I" i C~ l'l. C '2 t" rtr r~ V f:i on t !.: 'J ~.:~ :"'..1.("; v.'e e 1::: f1.0::l [;o:i..ng to seed on the fr.rl:l ~nci \.,'ill destro~,' t!:e Ge..le, c...nd \t;ill l-:.eep tIle ",:eeds c.nd grass cttt or defjtroyed on tIle fields !'.nd ditch b;;..111~s. All \",.ith t~e object of h~vinb lesE of a \':eed proble!n e C'..c h Ev.cceetiing ye ar . Cost of ,., e e d chelilice..ls to be borne by tlle JJessee. . 'I ,,~ d. li'hcl t i..tcssees :.la:t not assi[~n this leE,,~e or stlblease the pr'Jpcrt~l or rerl t 'Pasture to others .:.~i tl1>JUt the 'nrior \"!ri tten a~prova1 of the Lessors. 3. THE LES~lO.RS !lGREE AS FOLLO.~'!S: e a. Th2.t tlley T:ill mcorcl t!1e Lessees peaceful possession of the prer:1ises during the term Ilereof so long as tIle pay- ments c.re IHade E..nu the other covenants of the Lessees are per f or;ae d. b. TI1Cl t tl~~y \:!:..ll !}D.y :.111 t exe s ~nd irri.[;D. ti.on '.yet ter asseSSlaen ts 10 vie d clnu assesse d ilGai 11 st tIle above- describ e d reE..l property". c. That the.)' fJill fUl'llish all necessar~y inutorials re- quired for perluanent repairs and inlprovelaents of l)ipelines and structures. 4. TIle LcsGors rencrve the ricllt to enter upon tha fttrrn nt any tirne for .the p1.1rpOSe of I'!1n1dng repairs and ilnprover!lents, and for any other reasunable purpose. -2- 5. If tIle L.essors should [Jell or: other\'/iHe transfer title to the frtrr.1, they \"liJ.l 'do L~O LiUO ,jec't to tlle pro'.'j.r;io!1G of this lCD.L:e. 6. It is mutl'.ally aJ~reed t:.at this lea:::e ~'/ill be ::.utoraad.cally l"ene\.,ed frorn ycn.r to -yeur \':ith'Jut citller p~~rtJ Givin~ notice to the other. Eo~!ever, it call be ter.:liuuted. at the enu oi nny lease year by either p~~rtj' :.ivi:'L: 1.:ritten notice .to the o~hcr c.t least ~:O days prior to the l!oveJiber 30tll ellliing of t!"lQ let\~:e yei.tr. J\fter notice of terJ:lill:lt i....:dl, Lesuor sllClll 11<"1. ve posSeSGioll. of the I,lll:] at; soon as crops are 11~:rve~ted. .', / ~'1./--J-r/) · I / 4 t. tf', ~. .(~.e..- (. --' LE~SO~S :. Y -;!-- (;;/-,~,-t'./ , . ~. )~L~; /Q_.. C-L;l.. _ ~_. ..- . Jdhn v. Otter I / . ( .' .. . . .June s. Otter ;% f . ( I . l ( , '. . ,r.....--... / ( .' r'l'L .' . ~~ \'I:i tllC SO , )..\~ ,.. ... J '11- ./ \ . ~ ")~/):() n tv IY VU LESSEE.S ~(. ,," ..;1 :~ K't~. {.f ,c.l( t.U\U../ , !(enne th L. llscllenbrcnner ~ ;~ ... ...x~'" )" / · 6 I .> .v.,. 1/ I \..t" I . I . ,~ "'-J /0.... "'/' P I,I///.,/" /I.(~/,-..I,'( t., , ~ \ . Sharon l'\ccl'lcnbrel1Iler 1 ~~.......( 0.. (~~I/"" (/..~.. __~ +' ~ r;- v ~d t:Z .r:: r- J ,. :;J~ c:Z..-? 4::Z 4 .f!/ r- -r/" ".-GcZ' n-?4/;? r /.J 4" n ~./ '/ g d //i/J 2;1 r ~ h. t;L h'd ..;; r c:2 /:>&'/~ /' ,//,d.::;. / C ;;-47 .ra.-?-T- TP.r /. . . r.l5~ ; / /~> .., .1 y-r-,' - tJ r .-:i7 ;'7"./ r. · ../~_k ./-.; ./ ),~ d' ~~.L.. .f. IJ f. . ?1?/2c., /7'7;? . /,~;..--:d 2 (:.. t L.~ 1.., .-oU'..,../ (:-:< r .) (.. / / 'li7 ( //-;/7'-s~' .' /tL:- ~~r<--a.--~"-!--t- .v.> ~__A~<...A'..J .J~"~ P.k-.i )~2. ,ri.<...I 4':;;;!U fr;;~J.<---<- Z;".- ~~ .:..--: 7~~ --'-' /;7 G-f/ I) ~./ .;;- .' ?~~--<:._~.~ /./ _/ / j ~1L4<'~ ,. . L.I1-tI~l./...~l~ -,..-;;!-,cJ;~ - ;d'-~t/ / -:- J. -.I..j ,{0~ / /16'3 / I ~iA..AJ.....- ~'-/ ..... ./ "f. r", ,I. L.. 1'. _I ;;,1.' t... . t ~.. .. ...t...~ /:../., .~ /' .' h-' . · L.v!dJ.. .,,/ J-# /7' f z · dv ,(/.1.,,4A~L. ?,A...;,({'.-4.-('~ ~7:J ._~ -' .~. 0o,L~ . , 0.~ J.J I":J; /~G_"{~-; (,.j~..J..L..tI1,.."LA./ ~..-;' _c''''';'T .. ..!...L.. r-.<...' .;c;- ~.1r. . . . I/-/~ -fz ./ / / - /;? -f3 -;: ~.~.../ 6--:1 .11_ ".-.A.I t~ f)~. 0 Iff?;::::;;;:: ~~--' ~ - J7 L~~ /LtJ r--/ .If.5 ~ZJ . tl . .. 0:- Y: (.-;::1.-- ?.--J---' 4. --i j (/.' -.. ./ /0~.z {~~.l.......-/ . / /- /C'J - /. tJ. -r~1 f ~"i.l I , 1- J /1 ,1/ // (//~ . , ~"'5. /1' J) (I '1/ ( : ... I J :J~ .- ;. ) I i- I} . / .rL .. ? .~ I ~), / ~.. ., t' "'/ -' . . , ,., ./ , f ' 4 .A. · )... -., /J u ..) I ~ ) / JI- u, . L:'(' .1. t:.. .I.A.....<:.P/ / · {'1 1').1. dL:' Ii. t_ . ...J....~...,."/1" cr- U .",,-), ? /./ t' ....., -l /~tf,....-.7,/-?~ ..:;:7 , I ) 1\.-- . . I~.~~: I J ie:.,/... /..... -' /1- It - 2:5 . /" /1i.~ Cr..L<J..'Y"J.'-~~t..jr ~ t!~~.J ~ tjkc~ ~ /L)g) t~ l?ic. I~.,~ 7' ~.......I~.....A~ ~'J $';~. J'oI"~"'~~'~./ $' A A . ~- . ~-~ /G,,~..J ~ 0-' L , ?' I {..I- {, ~.c.(. L(; 'I".~/ ~'/ II ~ / off r:' J ',. / I. 'f, I/{-.II. I-u:. .,.:/ t. ~"7'l. .'Z./ 'I · · ~" ,/ I - :J t. J - J In / ....f, . .. . ,( 1 ; (..... J I I. t , ,..J<< << ..... /1 , f -. J / I I ~ I-" ,L t:'...- ~,/ I ./ '1 t: /. .. "'L ~ ,../ / . _I. ~.t. I j.... . lJ. ';:~.L.~-.", ./1 i/ J.1 ~- / I ...../L. ~ f LJ A'C_L c.::F- ~~ ../.J 4~,d-- r'J-eJ ... f. r I~ ) ~. '" t'."":" L.;'../l_ .~/ ,. . .. - ., I (.. /. / I~ ........1 .7 ((..~ /..,-l~.....,.._ {/f, 'ifl" ( //_ fl-~l )A,/~ ~)/"_'2.J./';P;I.:e;~.J-. /'-' ';;:':'_$n~'~~..,I V)~rr;:/ ?btc.;~: ~ /~P'P -~ ~'-td::' i; ..;:L'.f/~ .;' /"'~_ ad.5' ~"J" ~'-'d.~ ,,'~ I- ...., r 7'-~..',0. . I.~ ,~ T.- ,./ I,~'. ,-'rJ_-L-t::L--1_-~ :/ ~ I / ~~t~/ /I--~/- .. . I ~~ '~. SUPPLEMENT TO REAL rROPE~Y LEASE BETWEEN JOHN V. & JUNE S. OTTER AND KENNETH & SHARON ASCHENBRENNER ENTERED INTO ON OCTOBER /~ 1988. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. The original agreement, entered into on Sept. 12, 1978 as amended to date shall remain in full force and eff~ct. 2. That agreement is continued until Dec. 1, 1989 on the basis of ~ rent of $ 7'd p~" .--- . -, THERE IS ADDED BY MEANS OF THIS SUPPLEMENT, THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL AGREE~ MENT RELATIVE TO THE IRRIGATION WELL DRILLED AND PUMP INST~LLATION MADE IN AUGUST 1988 AND PUT IN SERVICE ON OR ABOUT AUG. ~~ 1988. ,~ 1. The Lessor provided the well, complete with casing, screens and gravel packing at his own cost and expense. Title to the same is accordingly vested in the Lessor. 2. The pump and electric motor complete with motor starter and switch gear was provided ~y the Lessee at his own cost and expense.' Title to the same is accordingly vested in the Lessee along with right of its removal from the premises upon termination of this agreement. .. t . . 3. In addition to rental on the land, provided for in the original agreement as amended to date, Lessee agrees to pay rent on the well and for 'water produced therefrom, at the rate of $1,000 per year, payable on Dec. 1 of each year. 4. Lessee shall bear the cost of maintenance and operation of pump installation including power and save the Lessor harmless from any claims arising therefrom. 5. Pump house, if and when constructed, will be at the expense of the Lessor and not removed from the premises upon termination of the lease agreement. ... "I ,,~ . LESSORS : ~~ // C1Lt'2J2/ ohn V. Otter . ~(~'7 f! -' at ()~~ J~ S. Otter Witness LESSEES L,~ 6 :z cu.",,-__ ~ Kenne h L. Aschenbrenner ~}J ~~~~ /Sharon Aschenbrenner . ' f...... .' " . ........ . " //-.1- g y -r-J. ~ /~ /~o~ . ~2' ~~~./ J ~~ ~l-~~<.....L~L J <:/ .?!~_ _ ~~L-4-Lf j1' ~o-t: /~. / ;7gg~. . . ..,Z/lf,.b;/ /b/) /#~J Lf)~ J )44:. ../ · , , I / 1'(::7 ~.. ~ t~;P tJ~U.~ j~PZ'-rJ~ V,,"' -, /0 ,J .j /Vo- ,q.... ....0 l;o (;,,;.(' ~"'V J & .' r l.",. '-.... //_ ,;? it _ ;;~ ;7;;'~"./ .,~' j/:'-': ~ ~.: - .: -~ c-I' 1':- ~ ~~: .Z:::Z- ~ I'.-L.I_.~~/Z- . /, .J5' ~./.--z::.... ~ /7';// /--J'~- ;/7tu.- /-rL----.z.-~ 7' /1S:r~.z:1 ;:; 1-;:--:1 .I--r) 1-. /. .,_~/ /1..? u-I- /1~-4_~~~(A-t.-~ .,:f4<.,../ /-:1 7-) '1' t..- ./i ~'>::'. .......:;.:,..; ()~<.../ IlL I / f/;;1o I.. .-z/-/~ , > . I "'. " J''-'--- l ~._..,..----: ,.Q. o . )/ __._-~-t_-t. .' ,/ /) . .. ' .. .. . <. ...- t... - ... --' ' . /. . \.......... I(.....~d /1;:' ti.~....l, L..-..-/ //-/'--/j -- /' , .../. i~_ ..~_..., (.' ( J' ;c..('.-'-"" J , . .,., t' ,;. -? ,j-V. ,,,..1.:::.1- pl-o! ,,) h- l.~ 7.1- . :r"lt / , ".) t.-:"-"" '- L-. 1--:1/.. . .' -a... ..--' /1--<'- l i, /';" r.)' ....,::"7 /. ~. or:;. ) I .' /1 /.. . I'''' /1 I' .../' ., , L......'i "_,, OJ t. '~l.---'" j'-'. .--- . / . :>. \.... /L....I.....L-I-AJ / ' /(~..._~(;2ft .~Ll. ."".---- //J _)-'f/j._IC~,_.7 .._../." /." (; I .:~.~ / -:/" / ./-- ~ / /'4 / {./ ... ,.: c... (/~ J .:/ . <. J 1_~:.6..r )'t. { J dO' . '/ e..~AJ p.c._". /~ ~!t..~ --' ,/ , J.~ J ,~,"/I · It l,,~'" ./1;.( j.-/t.. .-.;~" I J /;-- ~ ~"'-Z' ~-z'}._:r..4../ --,,2.,.~.,-,r ~ ~ . . /1:';.. '~-:-ZL;:UC'-""L- ./ J . .' /~.--:d 2 Ct~A,t----, //-/7-1> 7L ~~ ' 1 J .J-7 ~_~J.t; Pac,,1 /~7!f ~ ~ -::J-~ f>-u <' · -- d-? t- -I . ~ / 7#-'" · . l_.. ..j!Ifi. fJt'l . h . _ L_________ . . . · ot.' II_I&'- 91' ~~~, .!.~J-'~ ~~ ~A.-lJ $'~~ /, /;r;:r-~ . ~. c;~ ?2~ p-..t~~ i-;!t-o~ A~ ..~-r 7~-;' s S' ~~ ~I/~ . /(..,,<(;-:1 2 a.:,.l~..,~ ~ '} /) .__._~ . (// ~_.. / U' , d---L. - L. .l--L.-/ ..t '.p.. , . I . .:./'. . August 15, 1995 SUPPLEMENT TO REAL PROPERTY LEASE Illilde and entered into by and between JOHN V. OTTER and JUNE S. OTTER, "Lessors", and KENNETH & SHARON ASCHENBRENNER, "Lessees", entered into Septel11ber 12, 197(1. The original lease agreel11ent between the parties ;s dated September 12, 1978 and has s; nee been ex tended by endor'senlent, from year to year, ~he latest endorsement being Nov. 18, 1994, which specifies: "This agreement is extended to Dec. 1, 1995 on tho Sillne hils is as 1" s t YUi.\r, $ 5 , 500. 00 cash ran t . " WHERE AS, the Lessees crop rotation plan' calls for growing sugar beets on the entire leased property in the 1996 season, and, '~I ,~ WHERE AS, it is necessary for hint to begin extensive prep- arations including soil processing, weed eradication, etc. as early as possible this fall 'and, WHERE AS, All crops produced on the land under the 1995 lease have now been harvested and, WHERE AS, payulent has now been nlade by the Lessee to the Lessor J in fu 11 and fi na 1 paYlllent f"r the 1995 rent i n the aUlount of $5, 500. 00 , it is mutually agreed that the Dec. 1, 1995,' due date, established in the Nov. 18., 1994 lease extension, for paym~nt of the annual rent, ;s cancelled and no longer in force and effect." . Further, the original lease agreement is extended through the 1996 crop year, now defined as beginning August 15, 1995, and extending to ten days after th~ last of the 1996 crops . have been harvested or Decelllber 1, 1996, whichever is earliest, at which tiule the unnual lease payinent of $5)500.00 shall be due and payable. tOI?Y ( . LESSORS: LlA/'''/ ~ . /June s. Otter LESSEES: .." I ,,~ L.:;(-2 U:~_.jLL_ ---" Kennet L. Aschenbrenner .. z. tl~~ Aschenbrenner STATE of IDAHO, COUNTY OF ADA On this 15th day of August, 1995, before me, a notary public in and for. said State, personally appeared John V. Otter, June s. Otter, Kenneth Aschenbrenner & Sharon Aschenbrenner, known to me to be the persons whose names subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Il,~ J/VlZ 1/11, ~~ (-oPD l Notary Public Residing at go i s, .( Commission Expires. I d / 0 i) / (;l DO 0 · Idaho ~fR\fg)W t~[=(. .~.~~ ~\? r=r"'i '~C- .~/_3~_ .~e.__J NOV I) 3 1997 err\' Ot ~ERiDIAr\l ORDINANCE NO. 776 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING TITLE 5 OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 4 TO BE KNOWN AS BUILDING AND PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENTS' JOINT OPERATION; PROVIDING THAT REVENUE & FUNDING AND THE EXPENSE OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SHALL BE COMBINED, SUCH THAT BOTH DEPARTMENTS ARE FUNDED BY THE SAME APPROPRIATION AND THE EXPENSES OF BOTH DEPARTMENTS ARE PAID FROM THE SAME BUDGET AND FUNDS; PROVIDING THAT THERE SHALL BE AN OPERATING FUND FOR BOTH DEPARTMENTS WITH A RESERVE FUND ESTABLISHED TO ENABLE FUNDING OF THE TWO DEPARTMENTS IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT TAX REVENUES TO SUPPORT AND FUND BOTH DEPARTMENTS; PROVIDING THAT IF THERE ARE MORE REVENUES THAN THE EXPENSES FOR OPERATING THE DEPARTMENTS, ACCOUNTS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND FUNDS REMAINING AFTER THE PAYMENTS OF ALL NECESSARY EXPENSES OF THOSE TWO DEPARTMENTS MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO THOSE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ACCOUNTS CREATED; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho (the "City") is a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho and is authorized by Chapters 2, 3, and 10, of Title 50, Idaho Code, to adopt ordinances to provide for the funding of City Departments, set budgets, and provide for the expenses of the various departments of the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Title V is hereby amended to add and enact a new Chapter 4, which shall read as follows: BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Page - 1 A. SHORT TITLE: This Chapter shall be known and cited as the JOINT BUILDING AND PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT AND FUND. B. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this Chapter is to set forth, transfer, and combine, the BUILDING DEPARTMENT and the PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT for financial purposes. However, those Departments shall operate independently for all other purposes. The authority for the City to place two Departments of the City and to establish a budget for both Departments comes from Section 50-301, Idaho Code, which states, in part as follows: "cities governed by this act shall be bodies corporate and politic; and exercise all powers and perform all functions of local self- government in city affairs as are not specifically prohibited by or in conflict with the general laws or the constitution of the state of Idaho."; and Section 50-1002, Idaho Code, which states, in part, as follows: "The city council of each city shall, prior to passing the annual appropriation ordinance, prepare a budget, estimating the probable amount of money necessary for all purposes for which an appropriation is to be made, including interest and principal due on the bonded debt and sinking fund, itemizing and classifying the proposed expenditures by department, fund or service, as nearly as may be practicable, and specifying any fund balances accumulated under section 50-1005A, Idaho Code."; and Section 50-1005A, Idaho Code, which states, in part as follows: BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Page - 2 IfCities may accumulate fund balances at the end of a fiscal year and carryover such fund balances into the ensuing fiscal year sufficient to achieve or maintain city operations on a cash basis. A fund balance is the excess of the assets of a fund over its liabilities and reserves." c. That within the setup and government of the City of Meridian there are two separate Departments which serve two different City services. One Department, the Planning and Zoning Department, handles all annexation, zoning, and use of land issues. That Department charges fees for the provision of its services. The other Department is the Building Department and it handles the issuance of building and other permits for the construction of buildings and other similar matters. The Department, as do building departments for most other cities and counties, charges fees for the provision of its services. These Departments are funded by, and the expenses of these Departments are paid by and with, property tax revenues and revenues produced by the Departments, and paid for by applicants who require and use the services of the two Departments. D. The funding appropriation and budget for the two Departments shall be known as the JOINT BUILDING AND PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT AND FUND, which shall have three sub-funds known as the Operating Fund, Reserve Fund, and the Capital Improvement Fund. BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Page - 3 1. OPERATING FUND: The Operating Fund shall be an amount of money that should be suf.ficient to pay for all operating costs and expenses of the JOINT PLANNING AND ZONING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT and such amount shall be annually budgeted for that Department, both the Planning and Zoning and Building Departments, to operate for the fiscal year. 2 . RESERVE FUND: This Reserve Fund shall be based on carryover of funds as allowed by 50- 1005A, Idaho Code, be annually budgeted and funded by the City Council to a minimum of four months operating costs based on the average of the monthly operating costs of the prior three years. This shall be used to aid in transitions in the down- sizing or up-sizing of the BUILDING AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT as needed to react to rapidly changing economic times. 3 . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND: The City Council shall at the budget year end after meeting the needs of the OPERATING FUND and RESERVE FUND declare any funds left over to be surplus funds. Surplus funds shall then be transferred to the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND. Capital improvements shall be defined as BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Page - 4 improvements with a useful economic life of ten years or more by new construction or other action which increases the service capacity of a public entity. The capital improvements eligible shall be on the capital improvement plan or declared a capital improvement by the City Council. The City Council shall establish a separate fund for each capital improvement and the City Council, at its discretion, shall deposit monies to such funds. At such time any fund shall have reached its destined level the City Council may appropriate said monies to build or purchase the item for which the fund was created. The City Treasurer shall include in the monthly Treasurer's report the fund balance for each fund including accrued interest. This report shall be due the first City Council meeting of each month. SECTION 2: This Chapter is promulgated under the authority of the Idaho Constitution, Article 12, Section 2, and Idaho Code, Sections 50-201 and 50-302. SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, there is an emergency therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication according to law. BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Page - 5 SJ/L A ~ve In.6e I- PASSED AND APPROVED this ---=-day of /VO , 1997. CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: d1~;d~/~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR CI CLERK 11/03/97-Final BUILDING & PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Page - 6 ( ORDINANCE NO. 761 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REPEALING CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 4, OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION; AND BY RE-ENACTING CHAPTER 2 OF TITLE 4, OF THE REVISED AND COMPILED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION, WITH THE ADDITION OF THE MERIDIAN POLICE CHIEF TO THE COMMISSION AND MAKING OTHER MINOR CHANGES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, state of Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of tne said City to amend Title 4, Chapter 2, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinance of the City of Meridian to make needed changes to the Traffic Safety Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; SECTION 1: That Chapter 2 of Title 4, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian 15 hereby repealed. SECTION 2: That Chapter 2 of Title 4, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian is hereby re-enacted to read as follows: 4-201: CREATION: There is hereby created and established a conunission to be known as the "Meridian Traffic Safety Commission" . This Commission shall be a permanent Commission. 4-202: MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF OFFICE: The Traffic Safety Commission shall consist of seven (7) members and shall have designated seats, one (1) through seven (7), to be appointed by the Mayor and approved by the City Council on a vote of one-half (1/2) plus one, of the Council members. Members of said Commission shall hold office for a period of three (3) years each and said terms shall be staggered in such a manner so that the terms of not more than three (3) members shall expire in anyone year. Of the seven initial members appointed two (2) members shall be appointed for a term of one (1) TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION ORDINANCE - PAGE 1 ( ( year, two (2) members for a term of two (2) years, and three (3) members for a term of three (3) years. After the initial term has expired, such members shall hold office for a term of three (3) years. Members shall be selected so that there shall always be, and remain, on the Commission, one Joint School District No.2. school administrator or his designee, who shall be a Joint School District No.2. employee, one Meridian Public Works Director or his designee, who shall be a Meridian Public Works employee, one Ada County Highway District Commissioner or his designee, who shall be an employee of the Ada County Highway District, the Mer'idian Police Chief or his designee, who shall be a Meridian Police Department employee, and three (3) local citizens, two of which must be residents of the City of Meridian, and one of which may be a resident of the area of impact. All members of the Commission shall serve without compensation. 4-203: VACANCIES: Vacancies shall be filled by appointment of the Mayor , with the consent of the Council on a vote of one-half plus one of the City Council and the replacement member shall finish the term of the Commissioner they are replacing. When their term expires the replacement may be re-appointed to a new term or a new committeeman may be nominated, approved, and appointed under the terms set forth above. 4-204: TERMINATION: Members of the Commission shall only be terminated by the City Council under the provisions of 4'-107, DISQUALIFICATION FOR CAUSE, of Title 4, Chapter 1, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian. 4-205: ORGANIZATION: The Commission shall elect its own chairman and secretary, and create and fill such other offices as it may determine necessary, and adopt such rules as it shall deem necessary to carry out its purposes. The chairman shall only vote in the event of a tie. 4-206: MEETINGS: The Commission shall hold one regular meeting each month for not less than nine (9) months in each year. A majority of the appointive members of the Commission shall be necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting. All meetings shall be open to the public. A written record of its meetings, resolutions, recommendations, findings and determinations shall be kept and submitted to the City Clerk, which shall be a public record. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION ORDINANCE - PAGE 2 ( The Commission may require the attendance at any meeting of such other City officials as it may deem necessary and may request that other governmental officials, from any agency, or citizens attend the meetings. 4-207: DUTIES: It shall be the duty of the Commission to recommend and make suggestions to the Council for the adoption of plans for traffic safety as recommended by the National Safety Council Study of 1968. It shall coordinate all Meridian City Traffic study Plans into the State of Idaho Plan, but must gain approval of the City Council. It may make suggestions to the City Council for projects designed to increase pedestrian safety and control school traffic in the City, and to generally recommend to the Council plans to improve traffic safety in the entire City of Meridian. The Commission shall not work on, or take any proceedings, regarding the City's Transportation Plan or on Capitol Improvement Projects as they are the responsibility of the Transportation Task Force. SECTION 3: EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, there is an emergency therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication according to law. PASSED AND APPROVED this S~ay of &te/'Jt~, 1997. CITY OF MERIDIAN I WILLIAM G. BERG, JR.- C 11/05/97-Final CLERK _ ATTEST: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION ORDINANCE - PAGE 3 ORDINANCE NO. 760 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN ADOPTING A NEW TITLE 4 , CHAPTER 1, COMMISSIONS, OF THE REVISED AND COMPLIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN BY THE ADDITION OF NEW CHAPTER TO BE KNOWN AS CHAPTER 1, TO SET FORTH AND ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE FOR THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO CREATE COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND/OR COMMITTEES OF T.BE CITY FOR ANY SUCH COMMISSIONS, BOARDS, OR COMMITTEES, DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY COUNCIL; ESTABLISHING DUTIES; ESTABLISHING THE TERM OF OFFICE OF EACH MEMBER OF SUCH ENTITIES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, section 50-210, Idaho Code, states that the Mayor and City Council shall have authority to appoint such boards, commissions and committees as may be deemed necessary or expedient to assist the Mayor and City Council in better carrying out the responsibilities of their offices. WHEREAS, Chapter 1 of Title 4, Planning Commission, was repealed because the Planning and Zoning Commission was re- established in the Zoning Ordinance. WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, State of Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of the City to amend Title 4, Chapter 1, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, by adopting and asserting a procedure for the creation and establishment of any Commission'S, Boards, or Committees, desired to be created and established by the Mayor and City Council and setting forth requirements for those people who are appointed to serve on the COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND/OR COMMITTEES ORDINANCE PAGE 1 Commissions, Boards or Committees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Title 4, Chapter 1, of the Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, is hereby re- established and reenacted to set forth the procedure for creating commissions, boards, and committees, which shall read as follows: 4-101: CREATION OF A COMMISSION, BOARD, OR COMMITTEE: The Mayor and City Council may create a Commission, Board or Committee (hereafter referred to as "ENTITY"), by the passage of an Ordinance, which Ordinance shall set forth the duties, responsibilities, and rights of the ENTITY. The Mayor and City Council shall, in the Ordinance creating the ENTITY, state whether the ENTITY is permanent or temporary, and if it is temporary, state the dates and times of operation. 4-102: CREATION OF SUB-COMMITTEES: The formation of a Sub- committee by any Commission, Board, or Committee shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 4-103: NOMINEE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS: If the ENTITY is required to only have City residents as members, the Mayor shall only nominate people who have been residents of the City for at least FOUR years. If the ENTITY is allowed to have members who are not City residents, those persons nominated must have been resid~nts within the Urban Service Planning Area or Area of Impact, for at least FOUR years. 4-104: NOMINATION, VOTE AND APPOINTMENT: The Mayor shall nominate a person who shall be confirmed by a one-half (1/2) plus one vote, a majority vote, of the City Council to serve as a member of an ENTITY. The person nominated by the Mayor must be confirmed by the City Council by a majority a vote. If the council shall refuse to confirm any nomination the Mayor shall then, within ten (10) days after his previous nomination, nominate another person to fill the office and he may continue to nominate until his nominee is confirmed. If the Mayor fails to nominate an additional person within ten (10) days after his previous nomination, the City Council may select a person to serve on the ENTITY'S board by majority vote. Each person nominated to be a member of the ENTITY shall be individually approved without other nominated persons being approved at the same time. If a nominee is approved he shall take office. COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND/OR COMMITTEES ORDINANCE PAGE 2 (' - 4-105: MEMBERSHIP QUALIFICATIONS: a. For ENTITY'S requiring that all members be residents of the CITY: Members must have been, a resident of the CITY for FOUR (4) years b. For ENTITY'S allowing both CITY residents and non-residents: The total entity shall not be comprised of more than one-third of members who are not residents of the City. Those members who are required to be residents of the City must have resided in the City for four (4) years. Those members who are not required to be residents of the CITY must meet two of the followin.g three residency requirements: 1 ) Have previously resided within the City limits for four (4) years; 2) Have resided within the Urban Service Planning Area for four '(4) years; or 3) Have resided within the Meridian Area of Impact for four ( 4 ) years, or a combination of the latter two requirements. c. Members shall be selected without respect to sex, age as long as they are adults, profession or political affiliation, and shall represent a broad cross-section of the respective ENTITIES' interests in the area under the ENTITIES' concern or jurisdiction, if any. 4-106: TERM OF OFFICE: Original appointments shall be for terms of one to six years, at the discretion of the Mayor and City Council, in order to provide for the number of members and for staggering terms. At the expiration of each member's term he or she must be reappointed, or a different individual must be selected by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council by a majority vote to replace him or her. Members shall relinquish all voting rights upon the expiration of their term unless reappointed. All subsequent appointments made to fill vacancies occurring otherwise than through the expiration of the members terms shall be appointed for the period of time remaining in the term of the person he or she is replacing. 4-107: LENGTH OF TERM: The term of office of members shall not be longer than six (6) years and no member shall serve longer than two (2) consecutive full terms. COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND/OR COMMITTEES ORDINANCE PAGE 3 4-108: MEETINGS: A Commission, Board, or Committee shall hold regular meetings, as designated. A majority of the appointive members of an entity shall be necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting. All meetings shall be open to the public. A written record of its meetings, resolutions, recommendations, findings and determinations shall be kept and submitted to the City Clerk, which shall be a public record. 4-109 : DISQUALIFICATION FOR CAUSE: No ENTITY shall have the right to terminate an ENTITY member, for cause or otherwise, and such termination may only be performed by the City Council. A member may only be removed for cause by a vote of the City Council on a one-half plus one vote, following an opportunity for hearing by the City Council; the member subject to the disqualification proceedings shall be informed of the basis for the disqualification in writing at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing and shall have the right to participate in the hearing and may be represented by an attorney. The City Council shall make, and enter into the record of the proceedings, a written decision. The hearing shall be recorded and any party may appeal to the Fourth Judicial District Court. 4-110: BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEES: The Mayor may establish BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEES whose members shall be nominated by the Mayor and approved by the City Council by a vote of one-half (1/2) plus one, and the committee shall only be for a particular purpose and shall expire and terminate when the purpose is completed. The Ordinance or Resolution creating the Conunittee shall state the following: The purpose, when and where it shall meet, the length of duration, the determination or management of any matter, the examination or inspection of any matter, whether findings of fact and conclusions of law or a report or a recommendation are required, or any other requirement placed on the Committee in the Ordinance or Resolution creating the Conunittee. Members of a BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE shall receive no compensation or consideration for serving on a committee, but their expenses shall be paid. SECTION 2: EFFECTIVE DATE: WHEREAS, there is an emergency therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication according to law. COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND/OR COMMITTEES ORDINANCE PAGE 4 ( 5#v ;.k/reJ4v~ PASSED AND APPROVED this ~day of , 1997. ATTEST: ~~ WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. 11/06/97-Changed and CITY OF MERIDIAN CLERK ,~ - MAYOR COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND/OR COMMITTEES ORDINANCE PAGE 5 -~ '1 () ~ 2 9 0 9 , ~ . , ~ 'J ': ;'<~) -:'""- ;<. .- -' ~ . ,,' .' F' . I' '0 ;,~ (1 ~... ~ ~ j- -t r. (, ~ c c ) {"\ t)-ul..JL- fJ ORDINANCE NO. 775 1l-h1~~2n '97NO\f' 6 rl'l i L ~~ ~ ..... r- r .', . ~~ -.-- r c. L - -' -- -~~_-=. ~ . ~ ..... ' \ C (~- (':.- HE C C :', = ~ __, ,j, .', t ;" ~ '..i '. -'~ I ,," AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS GENTRY WAY AND THE EXISTING 10 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION EASEMENT ADJACENT TO GENTRY WAY IN LOT 12 AND LOT 13, AMENDED MAGIC VIEW SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of said City to vacate the public right-of-way known as Gentry Way and a portion of the utility, drainage and irrigation easement adjacent to Gentry Way in Lot 12 and Lat 13, Amended Magic View Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: Section 1: That pursuant to Section 50-1306A Idaho Code and Section 11-9-611A, Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Meridian, specifically, and Title 50, Chapter 13, Idaho Code, generally, the City of Meridian, having held the required hearing and it appearing that proper notice of said hearing was given and there being no objection, hereby vacates public right-af-way known as Gentry Way and the existing 10 foot wide public utility, drainage and irrigation easement adjacent to Gentry Way in Lot 12 and Lot 13, Amended Magic View Subdivision, a subdivision in Ada County, Idaho and recorded in the records of Ada County, Idaho. Section 2: WHEREAS, there is an emergency therefor, which emergency is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law. VACATING EASEMENT/GENTRY WAY ORDINANCE - PAGE 1 STATE OF IDAHO,) SSe County of Ada, On this ~-f't day of ffir/tWf b(r , 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to'me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the dal and year in this certificate first above written. ,""E'''Lu''Q''8.t ,;-.'\ (, - · . fi'" ...' ~ ' e;(;>:e-~':'~.~",:,\ -7 n C"d' " '" -::.,c ~'-"~ U p ~ ~,pf:) .c"'" ~ ""1"'1 (J) ~ t .., f ..;:/J " ,'~ .f:- '1h l~ _ ~.,., [~b ...~ ~ -..t (~ ;t; ~. ",,~ Q... , ~ .;;' :T~? i/ 8 ~~ ". -~ 4:] E , g ~, -:...... ~"'~~~ AI:-{P - ~ ,.:- *" o/.l, G,,~~~.~~''!.'' ,,_~ <-..... ~~ ..IJ ~'" "" ~'''' \fo~ 1{A> ,. , ~ ~.~ I '[~ r:. P' ~.. ~ :', 'I ...' ~ ~ I I l'; '0~ '3--' ~ ' J"~ \ \ \ ci ty\vacation \gentry'~vn\'Y~~. 11/03/97-Final SEAL ~ ORDINANCE VACATING EASEMENT/GENTRY WAY Page 3 PASSED by the City Council and approved b~ the Mayor ~~~ I A City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, this 5!11. day of . tiKI- , 1997. APPROVED: STATE OF IDAHO,) SSe County of Ada, ) I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Ada County I Idaho, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true I full and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled n AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS GENTRY WAY AND THE EXISTING 10 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND IRRIGATION EASEMENT ADJACENT TO GENTRY WAY IN LOT 12 AND LOT 13, AMENDED MAGIC VIEW SUBDIVISION, A SUBDIVISION IN ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, STATE OF IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE"; passed as Ordinance No. 775" , II! the City Coq~il and Mayor of the City of Meridian, on the ~ day of __ ~VtZ~/;.eJ- , 1997, as the same appears in my office. DATED this 5r!::: day of ;<!rPf/e hz.-be I- , 1997. \ \'" U 41t'}lIl, I ,\'\ ,..s: ~'III ,\.'~" \.II I,,,.,,~ ~~ ~ ~ . - !~ v~~ \. ~P- ~ ~WILLIAM G. BERG, JRo = SEAL ~CITY CLERK, CITY OF MERIDIAN ~ ~- ...f'. D f ~ "'.0 '~t 1$1 9 ~ ~ ~."..; ~ ~ .L"\~ ,,~ ~,; ~ ,"- ~I ~ t \,,,, -" \\,'\ Illtllnt "lH\\ ORDINANCE VACATING EASEMENT/GENTRY WAY Page 2