Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 08-17 ( 1. ORDINANCE # -- FULL TIME MAYOR: (REMOVE) 2. ORDINANCE #837 -- MA VOR AND CITY COUNCIL SALARIES: (APPROVE) 3. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS: (APPROVE KENT BROWN & RICHARD HATCHER, JR.) 4. TABLED 8/3/99: FINAL PLAT FOR MAWS NO.3 SUBDIVISION (7 BUILDING LOTS) BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING--NORTH OF PINE & WEST OF LOCUST GROVE RD: (TABLE UNTIL 917/99) 5. TABLED 8/3/99: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WILKINS RANCH SUBDIVISION (89 BUILDING LOTS ON 27.86 ACRES) BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT LLC - SOUTH OF USTICK & WEST OF TEN MILE: (APPROVE) 6. TABLED 8/3/99: ORDINANCE #838 - FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION: (APPROVE) ( 7. ORDINANCE # ..- ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 6.15 ACRES (FOR R-40 ZONING) FOR PROPOSED COBBLESTONE VILLAGE BY IONIC ENTERPRISES, INC.-SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOCUST GROVE & FRANKLIN: (TABLE UNTIL 917/99) 8. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TREMONT SUBDIVISION BY LUNA VISTA, INC. BROADWAY & 8TH STREET (725 W. 8TH): (APPROVE) 9. ORDINANCE #839 ..- REZONE OF 9.838 ACRES FROM R-8 WITH CONDITIONS FOR TOWNHOUSES TO R-8 WITHOUT CONDITIONS FOR PROPOSED TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISION BY LUNA VISTA, INC.- BROADWAY & 8TH STREET (725 W. 8TH): (APPROVE) 10. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 4.6 ACRES BY TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH I K. D. ROOFING-NORTH OF OVERLAND RD, SOUTH OF 1-84 & EAST OF TEARE AVE: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 11. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CHURCH PARKING, RECREATIONAL USES AND CONTRACTOR'S BUSINESS BY TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH I K. D. ROOFING-NORTH OF OVERLAND RD, SOUTH OF 1-84 & EAST OF TEARE AVE: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 12. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR USE OF EXISTING BUILDING FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL-BY CAPITAL CHRISTIAN CENTER-NORTH OF FAIRVIEW & WEST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 13. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR FINAL PLAT OF PACKARD NO.1, PHASE 2 BYTEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING - NORTH OF FAIRVIEW AND WEST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 14. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION IN MAWS NO.3 SUBDIVISION BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING - NORTH OF PINE AND WEST OF ADKINS AVENUE: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 15. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 2.0 ACRES OF LAND FOR OFFICE USE (I..L ZONING) FOR JACKSON'S FOOD STORES-NORTH OF FRANKLIN ROAD & EAST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 16. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PUD TO ALLOW OFFICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ON ADJOINING SITE FOR JACKSON'S FOOD STORES-NORTH OF FRANKLIN ROAD & EAST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 17. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PARTIAL EASEMENT VACATION IN ENGLEWOOD CREEK NO.2 SUBDIVISION BY BRIAN LEE CONSTRUCTION - LOT 17, BLOCK 6: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE ORDER TO APPROVE) 18. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.77 ACRES (FOR CG ZONING) OF LAND FOR PROPOSED EAGLE ROAD PROFESSIONAL CENTER BY FERMOR, LLC- NORTH OF 1-84 & WEST OF EAGLE ROAD, EAST OF ALLEN STREET: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 19. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE..THRU FOR MOXIE JAVA BY AVII L.L.C.-1800 N LOCUST GROVE RD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 20. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INCLUDES SIGNAGE FOR CHEVRON C-STORE WITH GAS PUMPS & DETACHED CAR WASH, MCDONALD'S WITH DRIVE-UP WINDOW (SAME BUILDING AS C- STORE) & IDAHO UNITED CREDIT UNION BY EAGLE PARTNER8-NW CORNER EAGLE ROAD & MAGIC VIEW DR: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 21~ PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO REDUCE SETBACK BY GENE KLEFMAN AT LOT 10 BLOCK 3 OF LAKES AT CHERRY LANE NO.2: ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL) 22. WATER I SEWER I TRASH DELINQUENCIES: (DO NOT HAVE REPORTS) 23. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 1. GARY SMITH: A. CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR WELL NO. 18 PUMP AND PUMPHOUSE: (APPROVE) B. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION - WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS: (APPROVE) c. CONTRACT MODIFICATION - USTICK RESERVOIR & BOOSTER PUMP STATION: (APPROVE) D. BID RESULTS I AWARD 1999 WATERLINE PROJECT PHASE 1 OVERLAND ROAD TO EAGLE ROAD: (APPROVE) ( E. AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH B & F ENTERPRISES: (APPROVE) 2. KENNY BOWERS: A. COLLECTIVE LABOR AGREEMENT WITH UNION #2311: (NO AGREEMENT) B. LINE ITEM ADJUSTMENTS: (APPROVE) ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17. 1999 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:30 p.m. on August 17, 1999 by Mayor Corrie. MEMBERS PRESENT: Ron Anderson, Keith Bird, Glenn Bentley, Charlie Rountree. OTHERS PRESENT: Mayor Bob Corrie, Will Berg, Bill Gigray, Bill Gordon, Gary Smith, Tom Kuntz, Kenny Bowers, Steve Siddoway, Brad Hawkins-Clark. Corrie: I want to welcome all of you here this evening to the Council meeting. Thank you for coming. We have the first on the agenda is the consent agenda items A, B, C and D. I would like to recommend that we take D off the consent agenda, and have it as a separate entity right after the consent agenda. The attorney has some things that you need to look at or hear. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would make a motion that we approve the consent agenda with the exclusion of removing item 0 from that agenda. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to approve the consent agenda A, B, and C with 0 being pulled off. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: On item 0, Mr. Gigray would you like to explain we have here on this property exchange lot 8 and 9? Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, this matter was brought to my attention as on the agenda and this has to do with a lot line adjustment that must have been occasion back in October of 1985. The lot line adjustment was recorded, but there were never any exchanges of deeds between the property and the city to affect a change of ownership of those portions of lots 8 and 9 that were affected by the lot line adjustment. You have before you for your consideration the proposed quitclaim deeds that were prepared by Pioneer Title and I think this is possibly in conjunction with the work being done on the letter of credit relative to the golf course clubhouse. This I believe was located in that process as being something that was not yet complete. The problem with this is and my inquiry was whether or not the property which is the subject of this exchange which would exchange property to the city was subject to any kind of lien that would pass with the deed because a quitclaim deed does not pass after acquired title. I was advised by Harold Houston at Pioneer Title that American Mortgage Company has a recorded deed of trust on this property and unfortunately that deed is with reference to the prior subdivision boundaries so any exchange of properties at this time would not remove that lien and I would not recommend that this process be completed until that lien is removed by a partial deed of re-conveyance from American Mortgage back to the parties that involve the other lot. So that's the sum and substance of my memo. I have written a letter to the other lot owners advising them of the need to do this. That went out yesterday. I have not heard from them yet. I think by the time this is communicated to North American Mortgage Company and they get appropriate authority to do all the ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 2 things they need to do, I don't know whether that can be done in two weeks. I would recommend it least be tabled for two weeks and possibly four in order to complete this process. Corrie: Any questions from Council? Anderson: I have none. Bird: I have none. Corrie: I will entertain a motion then to table this property exchange lot 8 and 9 block 1 of Lakes at Cherry Lane until the September 21st. Anderson: Mr. Mayor I would make a motion that we table item 0 property exchange for lot 8 and 9 block 1 of the Lakes at Cherry Lane until our September 21st meeting. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second to table consent agenda item D until September 21 , 1999. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Council, I do need to make an announcement to you for your approval. We forgot somehow to put in the regular agenda the variance that was at Cherry Lakes No. .2 Subdivision to allow an encroaching original porch to be replaced with an encroaching kitchen addition and setback of 12 feet. With your permission, I would ask that it be placed on here tonight as an emergency because it was noticed of a public hearing for tonight for that. Is there anybody here that is here going to be testifying on that? Okay. So Council, I would ask that it be placed on the regular agenda tonight wherever you would like to have it. Bird: Where do you want it at Mayor? Corrie: We can have it right after the last public hearing if you want to have it then. Bird: So make it 21. Bentley: Mr. Mayor are we going to be able to make it through all these public hearings tonight? Corrie: I think we might. I've got some things that I might combine 10 and 11 and 15 and 16. I need to check with you on that one as well. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I move we add the variance for Cherry Lane to item number 21 on the agenda. Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second to add the variance for Cherry Lane Lakes to agenda 21. Is there any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 3 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Also Council we might be able to save some time here tonight if we can combine number ten and number eleven which is the Treasure Valley Baptist Church annexation and conditional use permit and also 15 and 16 which is Jackson's Food Stores public hearing. If you don't have any objections to that. Is the applicants here tonight for those two as well? Okay do you have any objections to that. Council if you don't see any objections we can go ahead and do that when the time comes. Bird: That's fine. Corrie: Okay I think that takes care of the special announcements. 1. ORDINANCE # -- FULL TIME MAYOR: Corrie: Item number one is the ordinance we had last week. We had some confusion about what we could and couldn't do so I placed it back on tonight. So, Mr. Clerk if you would read Ordinance #, what will it be? Berg: Mr. Mayor if it's approved it will be 837 to try to keep it in chronological order. Corrie: Okay if you will read Ordinance #837 by title only then. Berg: Yes, thank you Mr. Mayor. (ORDINANCE #837 WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY) Corrie: Okay, you've heard the reading of Ordinance #837 by title only. Is there anyone from the audience who would like Ordinance #837 read in its entirety tonight? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on Ordinance #837 if you would like. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we approve Ordinance #837 with suspension of rules. Corrie: Is there a second on this so that we can give this a full discussion tonight? Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I'll second that. Corrie: Motion is made and seconded to Ordinance #837. Discussion? I think Mr. Gigray, you have given us a report on that in a memo form. Could you kind of tell us what we've got here and then could you kind of go from there? Gigray: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, at the direction and as the action occurred at the last Council meeting I have supplied the Mayor and Council with a memorandum of the City Attorney's opinion with regards to the action that was taken on August 3rd and the relative authority of the persons involved voting in this matter. The sum and substance of that opinion is that the action that was taken at the last Council meeting was the approval of a motion that no action be taken, which I believe Councilman Rountree had moved and that passed three to one and no final action was taken on the other motion. So therefore it is our recommendation that this matter could come back to the City Council under the Mayor's authority with regard to the presentation and matters to the City Council in the setting of the agenda and that is why it's back before the Council at this particular time upon motion and second. With regards to the issue of MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 4 whether or not there was a conflict of interest on the part of the Mayor to be able to vote to break a tie, it was our opinion that there is not. We have cited the various code sections which we believe are relevant to this particular matter. It doesn't within the definition of pecuniary interest under the ethics law of the state, there are specific provisions in the municipal code that provide when considering matters of setting the compensation of members of the Councilor the Mayor that the Council has the Mayor have that authority and there's a particularly deliberate methodology in which those can be passed. That is it has to be passed 60 days before the general election and doesn't take effect until January 1 following the election. There was a specific intent of the legislature to ensure at least the voters had some ability to respond to any such actions and it wouldn't take effect until the next calendar year. Also it would seem to make annulity out of the statute and the one I'm referring to is Idaho Code 9 5203 of the authority of the Mayor and Council to set compensation because if there is a conflict of interest on the part of the Mayor, there would also be on the part of the Council when issues of the compensation of the Council were brought to the - for consideration. As far as other matters, it's our recommendation that the Council consider amending Ordinance #1705B of the municipal code because it references the authority with regards to what governs Council meetings and this references a very old publication of the Idaho Municipal League. I've referenced a follow up in this memo and our intents to locate that particular document and at this point the Association of Idaho Cities has not been able to locate it. So I think we really do need to address that issue as well at some point and not the very distant future. I think the rest of the memo pretty much speaks to the main items that I've addressed here. If you need further report on this, I'll be happy to follow up. Corrie: Thank you Mr. Gigray. Further discussion? Bentley: Mr. Mayor my feeling on this ordinance is it's time to move ahead with the growth of this city, the amount of work that falls under the authority of the Mayor. I feel that it's time that the city does have a full time Mayor. And I would like to see this ordinance passed tonight. Thank you. Corrie: Further discussion? Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I'll repeat my previous position of the last meeting and something along the lines of but given the contemplation and thought over the number of months that we've been dealing with this, I've been full circle. At this point, I'm not in favor of the ordinance and I would support leaving our ordinance as is, which really doesn't specify one way or another full timeness or part timeness of the Mayor, but the Mayor does sufficient work for the needs of the city. I would also encourage that we look at a full time administrative person that would work for a Mayor and provide continuity in administrative activities to all the department heads. Corrie: Any further discussion? Anderson: Mr. Mayor I guess I'm probably the pivotal vote in this thing tonight, and I've gone flip flopping back and forth. I feel like a fish out of water on this thing. But just a ,- ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 5 couple of observations. Number one in this ordinance, there's a number of references to the Mayor being his and I think it's probably inappropriate to assume that the Mayor is always going to be a male. So I would think those would need to be stricken out of this particular ordinance, and then I also favor a full administration position that would oversee pretty much the day to day affairs of the city, which would add consistency to the management of the city and with the department heads even through times of election, but it doesn't appear like that is on the near horizon. So at this point I think our existing ordinance does not necessarily prohibit a Mayor from working full time or part time. It's just a matter of the salaries that we set which is the next item on the agenda. So I'm not really going to say right ,now how I'm going to vote. I'm going to sit on top of that fence for a couple more minutes. I like it on the top here. Bird: I hope it don't get sore. Anderson: Savor the moment. Bentley: Watch out for those pickets. Corrie: Any other discussion? Bird: I don't have any. Corrie: Weill still I gave my opinion last time. Having been Mayor for four years, I feel too that it would be nice to have an assistant to help with the day to day things in the Mayor's office. In the four years that I've had, it has been a full time job. I'm sure everybody realizes that. I am one who is definitely feel that it should be a position of full time and then perhaps have an assistant and also perhaps a person in the finance department can help much the same as Nampa has and Boise. The City of Meridian is now (inaudible) depending on which you take it's 36 to 38,000. In four years it could be 50,000. I think that there's plenty there for the Mayor to have to do. That's my opinion on it. So with that, is there any further discussion? Bird: I have nonea Corrie: Okay if not, then we'll vote on Ordinance #837 by roll call vote. ROLL CALL VOTE: ROUNTREE, NAY. BIRD, NAY. BENTLEY, YEA. ANDERSON, NAY. MOTION DEFEATED: 3 NAY, 1 YEA. 2. ORDINANCE #837 -- MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SALARIES: Corrie: Okay ordinance number - Berg: Excuse me Mr. Mayor, it would be 837 if we try to keep it in chronological order. In talking with the City Attorney it would be best instead of knowing why skip numbers. Corrie: Okay, gotcha. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 6 Bird: What number is it? Corrie: 837. Since this is an ordinance that has some holes in it, mainly the wages, I would suggest that we have a discussion on this first so that you can come to some agreement before we have the blanks filled in. Is there any discussion that you would like to do before this discussion? If not we'll go right into the ordinance. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I suggested some ranges the last time we looked at this. Something on the order of nothing from 5 to $600 for City Council and from no increase to an increase of approximately $6,000 for the Mayor's position which would bring it up to $20,000 on it per annum. Corrie: Okay so the salary of the Mayor shall be how many dollars per month then? Rountree: Well that would be $1667. Corrie: Okay any other discussion? Bird: What was the Council's? Did it stay the same? Rountree: Given the budget situation we've got this year, I can't support increase for us. Bird: I can't either. Corrie: Okay you're staying at five then. Rountree: Just stay where it is. I mean that's my opinion. Bird: Mr. Mayor I agree that to raise the Mayor's salary, because it probably needs it, but with the restraint we've had on our budget this year, we've asked all the departments to tighten their belts and I think we can just tighten ours right with it if we think we need a raise, which I don't think we do. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I'm going to disagree, because I feel the funds are there. I feel that we still have got a lot of work to do on that budget. I feel with the extra meetings that we're now attending, the extra work we're now attending, I feel we should be compensated or at least brought up to what the rest of the Councils are getting in the area. So I would support going to $600 for the Council and I would even support $100 a month for the Council President for his extra activities as the other councils do. Corrie: Okay any other discussion? [' (- MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 7 Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would also an increase in the Mayor's salary. As for the Council members, I know I for one didn't sign on for this position for the money. And I'm more than willing to serve out my term for the existing pay that's there. So in light of keeping a tight budget and showing that we're willing to do what we ask our troops to do, I would be willing to forego any increase in salary for the Council members. Gigray: Mr. Mayor point of information for the Mayor and Council. You have before you two forms of an ordinance. One does away with any designation for the Council President. The other would set that amount, so if you feel that you've got - someone wants to make a motion on some point on the ordinance, I just want to point that out. The existing ordinance has I think a rather cumbersome provision regarding the Council President because it provides for a different rate of pay which would be equal to that of the capacity of the Mayor prorated for the period of time they perform the duties and that's kind of a cumbersome thing to work with I think. Rountree: It costs more to figure out than - Corrie: Okay. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we adopt Ordinance #837 that would reflect an increase in the Mayor's salary to $1 ,667.00 per month. No increase in the City Council salary and delete the reference to compensation for the Council President. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second to Ordinance #837 that the Mayor's salary shall be $1,667.00 and the salary of the Council President at $500. Is this the ordinance that you want? Rountree: Yes. Corrie: Okay then we need to have the City Clerk read the ordinance by title and then we'll vote on the ordinance. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor. (ORDINANCE #837 WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY) Corrie: Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have Ordinance #837 read in its entirety? Hearing none, a motion was made by Mr. Rountree and second by Mr. Bird to the salary of the Mayor to $1667 per month and the Council to stay the same at $500 a month. Rountree: Mr. Mayor that motion would be for suspension of rules. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 8 Corrie: And suspension of rules. All right. Any further discussion? Hearing none roll all vote. ROLL CALL: ANDERSON, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. Corrie: All right Ordinance #837 has been passed. However I might add it might be vetoed. I didn't take this job for the money and I don't think that I should be making if nobody else is either. 3. APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS: Corrie: At this time Council I would like to recommend two new names for the Planning and Zoning Commission. We have two positions open. Tonight I would like to - you have the resumes of both these people. I would like to recommend that Richard C. Hatcher, Jr., who is an architect be appointed. And also L. Kent Brown, who is the project manager analysis right at the present time at Boise City Ada County Subdivision Applications. Do we have any discussion? Bird: Mr. Mayor I believe L. Kent Brown works for Briggs Engineering now, not for the Boise City. Corrie: I think that's correct. I'm sorry. (Inaudible) Any further discussion? Okay, hearing that is there any - would anybody like to issue a motion to accept Richard C. Hatcher, Jr. and L. Kent Brown as the two replacements on the Planning and Zoning Commission? Anderson: Are they in the audience? Corrie: Yes, they are. Anderson: Would they raise their hands then to see who I'm voting on? One of them is here. Corrie: Kent Brown, right, and I can't break a tie. It's got to be 3 to 1 or all 4. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I would prefer that we do each individual if that is consistent. Corrie: All right then let's start with L. Kent Brown. My recommendation is that he be appointed the Planning and Zoning Commissioner. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I move we accept the nomination of L. Kent Brown to P & Z for the City of Meridian. \" ( \, MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 9 Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and seconded that we approve L. Kent Brown as one of the Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor, let's do a roll call vote to make sure we have it right. ROLL CALL: ANDERSON, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. Corrie: Kent, you have been approved by City Council. Anderson: I hope you know what you're getting into. Rountree: You'll find out if it's worth a turkey or not. Corrie: The next appointee would be Richard C. Hatcher, Jr., who is the architect with Lombard Conrad. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve Richard C. Hatcher, Jr. to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second that we approve Richard C. Hatcher, Jr. as a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll call vote. ROLL CALL: BIRD, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. ANDERSON, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. Corrie: Richard C. Hatcher, Jr. is approved and is on the Planning and Zoning Commission. Congratulations to both of you. Kent, glad you're here tonight. 4. TABLED 8/3/99: FINAL PLAT FOR MAWS NO.3 SUBDIVISION (7 BUILDING LOTS) BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING-NORTH OF PINE & WEST OF LOCUST GROVE RD: Corrie: We have here Council a variance that's coming in on item number 14, and I think that we probably should have the variance Findings of Fact and Conclusions of (- \ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 10 Law and Order presented to you before you do the final plat on Maws 3 Subdivision. Is this correct, Mr. Gigray? Gigray: That's correct. Corrie: I would ask that you table this until the meeting of September 7th following the public hearing which will be on the variance. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I move we table the final plat for Maws NO.3 until September 7, 1999. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second that we table the Maws final plat No.3 Subdivision until September 7th, 1999 meeting. Any further discussion? Rountree: Mr. Mayor, the only comment I would make is if there are issues with the final plat, it would be nice if the applicant knew those now. He could be working on those concurrently with getting ready for the next hearing. I don't have any. I don't know if anybody else does and I don't know if staff has got any outstanding issues but if they're there we ought to let them know that. Corrie: Staff is there any outstanding conditions that you have there on that one? Siddoway: I know of no outstanding issues on the plat other than the variance itself and we were going to recommend the same. Corrie: Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 5. TABLED 8/3/99: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WilKINS RANCH SUBDIVISION (89 BUILDING LOTS ON 27.86 ACRES) BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT LLC - SOUTH OF USTICK & WEST OF TEN MILE: Corrie: Council we have a problem here as well. I think this is a new plat and it's going to require a public hearing. I think it needs to be noticed in this case and also you can determine whether the City Council wants to hear this or refer it back to Planning and Zoning. Any comment Mr. Gigray? Gigray: No, I note that in the file there was a memo from Steve Rutherford to the Mayor and Council with regards to this particular matter. This had to do with the development agreement, but the development agreement would not be something that would be (- ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 11 involved in the preliminary plat. That would be a matter associated with annexation and zoning. Now whether or not there were conditions that were imposed on annexation and zoning that would be relative to this development, then it would be relevant at a hearing on this preliminary plat before the City Council. Corrie: Discussion Council? Rountree: Mr. Mayor it seems to me that we've seen this plat before in a somewhat different form. It was a little higher density. It was our desire to see the density and the zoning at R-4 as opposed to R-8 which was the request. I think it's been past practice that if there is a lessening of the development intensity and the potential impact on one of these that's gotten to the Council after Planning and Zoning, that we've not had another public hearing. We simply acted on the modification that we've requested so I'm not sure in my mind I'm convinced we need to have another public hearing. They have responded to our direction and our Findings of Facts on this. Corrie: I think I agree with you Charlie, but they changed the preliminary plat. Bentley: Mr. Mayor they had to change the preliminary plat because we told them to. Corrie: I know we did, that's (inaudible) Bentley: I don't know. I guess I would have to refer it over to Counsel and get his opinion because that was one of the - it was virtually a condition we put on it. It's the only way we would accept it and they've made corrections in accordance to our wishes and I would prefer not to send it to a public hearing, but I guess I would have to hear from the Counsel as to what his opinion is on that. Corrie: I don't disagree. Mr. Gigray? Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, your ordinance provides for public hearings at preliminary plats. You don't have public hearings on final plats. Since this matter was not approved as a result of the former public hearing as was sent back and has come back again to the City Council, I would suggest that the safe play would be to advertise it for public hearing once again because of any possible change of conditions. If you feel that there aren't changes of conditions and there have been adequate public notice and it has been adequately addressed and that it doesn't pose any new issues which should be addressed by persons who might be opposed to this and you don't need any addition evidence with regards to the preliminary plat, then I guess you make a decision not to have the public hearing. (/ \ ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 12 Anderson: Mr. Mayor I guess a point of order for my own clarification because I don't understand, but could we have either staff or the applicant explain what changes were made? Gigray: Mr. Mayor I would recommend that we're getting into a public hearing when we do that, because you're taking information with regards to this that would be part of the record. Anderson: Even from our staff. Gigray: Yes. Now if you wanted to ask about what procedure it's been through and limit it to procedural issues, I would say you could get that information. But if it gets to the merits of this application, that's where we have problems. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I guess one final point if you'll let me. If doesn't seem to me that there's a substantive change in the plat. That portion of the property that was (inaudible) previously is still not platted. The road configurations are essentially the same. We have a few fewer lots because the lot sizes have gone up. In my opinion I don't recognize that as a substantive negative change, but I would like to hear from staff if they've had a procedural review in terms of consistency with the ordinances for an R-4 subdivision and what if any comments they may have as it relates to our requirements. Corrie: Staff comment on that particular - Hawkins-Clark: Mayor, Council the plat does conform to the R-4 standards. The frontages have been expanded and as Councilman Rountree stated, there have been I believe six or seven total lots omitted from the plat to get the appropriate frontage on those other lots. The only other change they have changed the location I believe of a storm drain which was previously located up on the northwest corner going out towards Ustick. That was on the previous plat, but that's been modified and my understanding is that the Public Works Department doesn't have any issues with that. Rountree: Thanks Brad. Hawkins-Clark: Also the understanding is that the public hearing looking over the past record was never formally closed on this plat. Bird: That's right. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: If that's the case then, we've never closed the public hearing then we could take testimony tonight. ...- It \ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 13 Bentley: No we can't. We didn't continue it. We didn't notice it as continued. Corrie: That's right we didn't notice it. Gigray: We haven't given notice of continuances as long as we've given the evening that's going to be continued to the next Council meeting. Because everybody has the opportunity to be present and to testify and assuming it's continued it's continued and you don't have to renotice it then. (I naudible) Corrie: You said we can? You said we can open it up? Gigray: I mean if you haven't closed it, I'm not- Corrie: I'm not sure we didn't close it though. We didn't have it. Bird: Yeah, we had a public hearing the week of the last week of July. Now we went on - July 20th and we closed the public hearing on July 20th. Now last week we just tabled it when it came before us. I believe we closed the public hearing or did we continue it August 3rd. If we continued it to August 3rd, then we didn't continue it from August 3rd to the 17th. We were out of order at that point. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, ('m looking at the minutes that's in our packet from August 3rd, which maybe the clerk is gathering them up. On August 3rd, we motioned to table this until the 17th. Bird: But it was not opened up as a public hearing. Even though we had at that point had invited - we asked Becky if two weeks would be long enough even though it wasn't - I think on July 20th we closed the public hearing. Bentley: I don't have those minutes. Bird: Do you have the minutes? Hawkins-Clark: Yeah, looking back at the minutes, I confirm that now. It was closed. Bird: It was closed and we went ahead and tabled it until we could - we instructed for it to pass that they had to conform to R-4 that we didn't want any R-8's out there, and I don't know why if we go back to R-4 which is in our ordinance for that location why we have to have another public hearing why we can't enact upon it right now. r 1 1 ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 14 Hawkins-Clark: ... was to allow the applicant to respond since you requested the R-4 as compared to the R-8, and there was also a discussion about a PUD. You left the applicant with two options. One was the PUD and one was to do the R-4. They chose the R-4. Bird: That's right. Basically they eliminated some lots. The streets didn't change or anything else. The only thing that was changed was to get some frontage. Most of the lots had the 8,000 square foot, it just didn't have the frontage feet that we needed. Am I not right? Is that right? Hawkins-Clark: That's correct. Bird: Okay so I don't know why we can't act - I don't know why we have to go back to a public hearing anyway. I don't know why we can't enact upon it tonight. Corrie: If you so desire, you can. Bird: I so desire. Corrie: Well then let's put it up for a vote and see where it goes. Bird: See what the other guys want to comment Mayor. Corrie: Do I hear any comments from Council? Rountree: I don't have any more to say. I think this is a reaction to conditions that we provided to the applicant and I think we probably ought to take action on it. Corrie: I don't disagree. I just don't want it to come back and hit us in the face. I'll entertain a motion on request for preliminary plat for Wilkins Ranch Subdivision. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I would move we approve the preliminary plat for Wilkins Ranch Subdivision the plat that's dated 8/11/99. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second the request for preliminary plat be approved as shown on the plat as mentioned in the motion. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 6. TABLED 8/3/99: ORDINANCE #838 - FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION: MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 15 Corrie: Mr. Clerk, what is the ordinance number? Berg: Mr. Mayor it's ordinance number 838. Corrie: Mr. Clerk would you read Ordinance #838 by title only. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor. (ORDINANCE #838 WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY) Corrie: Is there anyone from the audience who would like to have Ordinance #838 read in its entirety? Hearing none, I will entertain a motion on Ordinance #838. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, it seemed like Gary Smith was going to get some additional information. (Inaudible) Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would make a motion that we approve Ordinance #838 Flood Damage Prevention with suspension of rules. (End of Tape) Bird: Second. Corrie: Okay motion is made and seconded that we approve Ordinance #838 with suspension of rules. Discussion? Yes, Mr. Anderson. Anderson: Gary, could you explain what this is? Smith: Yes, sir. Mr. Mayor and Council members, Councilman Anderson, the original flood damage prevention ordinance that was approved by the City of Meridian was done so adopting maps these flood insurance rate maps that were dated September 27, 1991 for the city and since that period of time there have been numerous instances where the flood plain limits have been changed through what is called a LOMR, Letter of Map Revision that was submitted to FEMA based on engineering hydraulic studies of the floodways or flood plains areas, and since the time that this ordinance was enacted by the City Council, there have been numerous LOMR's that were approved by FEMA and this new ordinance consolidates and updates all of our FIRM's, Flood Insurance Rate Maps that were prepared for the City of Meridian city limits to include those revisions and there were also some other items of information that FEMA was requesting that have been submitted to them. Most of them had to do with street names. We've updated the maps to show the subdivisions that have been added etc. These additions were submitted I should say the additions, revisions were submitted to us for review and Cheryl Sable in my office has made that review of the revisions and has confirmed that the revisions as have taken place are correctly shown on these revised maps. And she has responded to FEMA that is the case along with some other information that FEMA requested like I said earlier concerning primarily street names, but that the basis for the upgrade of the ordinance and I think the language has been changed. The very end of that sentence that's underlined in the ordinance that reads declared to be a part of this chapter together with any subsequent revisions thereof will negate having to bring this item back before the Council for future revisions. The letters of map revision, the ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 16 LOMR's are based on hydraulic engineering studies of the floodways and the flood plains. And a lot of times the information that is generated from these LOMR's is much more detailed than what the original flood study used and that's why the flood plain areas are changed. Also the flood plain areas can be changed by the addition of fill material in the flood plain area. Several subdivisions that were developed in the City of Meridian chose to go in that direction bringing in fill, raising the elevation of the land thereby taking it out of the flood plain area, but again this was done through a LOMR and that has to be certified by an engineer. Anderson: And for clarification purposes are there some federal benefits that are available to you if you're in a flood plain or other options or what's the point of adjusting the maps there? Does that then make you eligible for flood insurance? Smith: No, I think the adjustments to the maps have reduced the flood plain areas and so it takes property out of the flood plain area and takes you out of the need to subscribe to flood insurance requirements. Anderson: Thank you. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I think your last comment answered the question I had for you Gary, but clarify it. You don't believe additional lands have been incorporated into either the floodway or the flood plain that the LOMR essentially reduced the amount of land that's occupied in this areas. Smith: Yes, correct. The letters of map revision have in all cases that I know of reduced the flood plain boundaries. Rountree: I have a question for Steve, he's not paying attention I know, but we're talking flood plains, floodways here. Has any of this stuff been to P & Z and have you seen any relief for our new citizen of the community that's having problems with FEMA as it relates to floodways, Mr. Humphrey? Have you reviewed this with respect to that situation? Siddoway: Mr. Mayor and Councilman Rountree, I did some research into the requirements to revise those floodway maps and they were - the hydraulic engineer that he was using was doing the calculations that were necessary to determine if he was in the floodway. The calculations clearly showed that he was in the floodway and there seems to be no relief in that particular situation. Rountree: Okay. Corrie: Any further questions? Okay, Ordinance #838 has been ask for a vote then. So are you ready for the question, we'll have roll call vote. ROLL CALL: ANDERSON, YEA. ROUNTREE, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. BIRD, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL YEAS. 7. ORDINANCE # -- ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 6.15 ACRES (FOR R-40 ZONING) FOR PROPOSED COBBLESTONE VILLAGE BY MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 17 IONIC ENTERPRISES, INC.-SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOCUST GROVE & FRANKLIN: Corrie: Council it has been brought to my attention today that we have a problem here and I would like to have the attorney tell you about it. Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, for your information I received a letter dated August 12th from JoAnn Butler representing the applicant in this. The issues here have to do with the development agreement. I've been given some advice with regards to a request to change the parties that would be in the development agreement. I think that poses problems with the findings and the prior actions of the Council. There were some proposals with some changes, and I would request that the City Council consider a table of this consideration until we get the issues of the development agreement. It's been the practice of the City to not pass annexation and zoning until the development agreement has been signed because it's a condition of the zoning designation the development agreement is required. I think it's going to take us until the next Council meeting to get this ferreted out. Hopefully we can get it resolved and back in front of you so you can take action. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we table the annexation and zoning ordinance of Cobblestone Village until 917/99. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to table this annexation and zoning request until September 7, 1999 meeting. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 8. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TREMONT SUBDIVISION BY LUNA VISTA, INC. BROADWAY & 8TH STREET (725 W. 8TH): Corrie: Mr. Clerk, the development agreement has been signed. Berg: Mr. Mayor, yes it has been signed. Corrie: Any further discussion on the development agreement? I'll entertain a motion on the development for Tremont Subdivision by Luna Vista Inc. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we approve the development agreement for Tremont Subdivision by Luna Vista, authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest to the resolution. Anderson: Second. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 18 Corrie: Motion is made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Anderson to approve the development agreement, the Mayor to sign, the Clerk to attest. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 9. ORDINANCE #839 -- REZONE OF 9.838 ACRES FROM R-8 WITH CONDITIONS FOR TOWNHOUSES TO R-8 WITHOUT CONDITIONS FOR PROPOSED TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISION BY LUNA VISTA, INC.- BROADWAY & 8TH STREET (725 W. 8TH) Corrie: This will be Ordinance #839. City Clerk would you please read Ordinance #839 by title only? Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor. (ORDINANCE #839 WAS READ BY TITLE ONLY) Corrie: Is there anyone from the audience who would like Ordinance #839 read in its entirety? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on Ordinance #839. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we approve Ordinance #839 with suspension of rules. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Bird to approve Ordinance #839 with suspension of rules. Any further discussion? Hearing none. ROLL CALL: ROUNTREE, AYE. BIRD, YEA. ANDERSON, YEA. BENTLEY, YEA. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 10. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZON-ING OF 4.6 ACRES BY TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH I K. D. ROOFING-NORTH OF OVERLAND RD, SOUTH OF 1-84 & EAST OF TEARE AVE: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 11. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CHURCH PARKING, RECREATIONAL USES AND CONTRACTOR'S BUSINESS BY TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH I K. D. ROOFING-NORTH OF OVERLAND RD, SOUTH OF 1-84 & EAST OF TEARE AVE: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: As I mentioned earlier tonight item number ten and eleven deal with the same applicant. If the Council has no objections, the applicant has no objections, and MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 19 anybody in the audience have any objections to putting item number ten and eleven together on a public hearing. Gigray: Mr. Mayor point of information and procedure for the Mayor and City Council. In regards to this matter, I would recommend that for purposes of the record it be clarified that you'd combining these two items for the purpose of conducting a public hearing so that people could address the issues to both the annexation and zoning request and the conditional use permit request. Then my recommendation of the Council is that you would take action on annexation and zoning request first and that you delay action on the conditional use permit until there is appropriate action and passage of an ordinance so that the property in question is subject to the ordinances of the City of Meridian with regards to item 11. But that it would save time and I think some of the issues might be compatible if these hearings were combined for purposes of the record. Corrie: Okay hearing no objections, I'll open the public hearing on items 1 0 and 11 for request for annexation and zoning and also request for conditional use permit and invite staff comments first. Hawkins-Clark: Mayor and Council I'll deal with the annexation first as far as the staff report and then just go right into the CUP if that's the way you are going to work it. There we go. It wasn't your glasses after all. Subject property is here is Overland Road. Down here it's on the north side of Overland Road. Teare Avenue is located just to the west. There currently is a request for these five parcels on the other side of the Nine Mile Drain. That is before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a 300 unit apartment complex. The Planning and Zoning Commission did recommend approval of the annexation to you. The City Attorney if I'm correct is waiting for two legals before formal approval can be done on this. The two legals, this is the one piece as it currently is. The proposal for the annexation is actually to divide it into two separate legal parcels. You can see that the north part of the parcel is proposed 3.44 acres, part of Treasure Valley Baptist Church which would be used for recreational and parking and other purposes and then the south part of the parcel which fronts on Overland Road is proposed for K.D. Roofing which is the following item the conditional use permit. The proposed zone for the north is L-O, which is the same as the church currently is and the proposed zone for the south is C-G. In terms of staff recommendations, I think the development agreement is suggested. I would refer to staff comments dated June 17th, 1999. There was testimony submitted by Jay Edmonds which I believe you all have noting three different issues being trash, weed control and then the waterline not to impede his irrigation access. Sewer easement would come from the north up here. An easement should be dedicated to come through this property to the south. Staff to encourage as far as an entryway corridor, Overland a 35 foot landscape setback. Here's the site plan moving on to the next item. The conditional use permit this is the proposed site plan. I would again refer you to the staff comments June 17, 1999. We MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 20 would note that in your files the front page has the appropriate agenda item, but the recommendations from the attorney show the Capital Christian Center in your file. So I don't know if that's a mistake. I don't believe we have the recommendation drawn up. So there is some collation there, but I think that you have in your files the recommendations for this one, but again the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of this site plan noting some of the staff comments which you have. Currently there is a proposed 30 foot gravel surface easement and I would as staff invite the applicant to present the reason for that. I think it could potentially - the ordinance requires paving for any drives or parking areas which this apparently is not. On the other hand as far as maintenance and dust abatement and those kinds of things, I think we would at least like to see some kind of requirement put on that for maybe sod or lawn or at least some kind of a dust abatement measure put on that. The gravel surface over here is slatted. There's currently a residence on this side. This site would provide a screen there. But another item for your consideration. The only change in your packets is the landscape berm. I believe that there is a proposed change on this 35 foot berm here. So I think that concludes the staff. Corrie: Okay. Is the applicant here? Aldridge: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, Bob Aldridge the attorney for the applicant. In no particular order do we respond to the things that staff has brought up. We work with them. We're in full agreement with all the terms and conditions that have been put forth. The 30 foot area on the right hand side is going to be in fact paved. That's an eventual future easement out for church overilow on Sundays only. But that will be when that entire back area turns into parking versus the recreational use, which is I assume a number of years down the road and would have to be brought back for additional conditions at that time in any event, but that's the reason for keeping right hand side free is to have that eventual use. In addition to that, staff had requested that we give easements out if necessary to the adjoining property to the east during construction. And again that would require along that side having a way for them to be able to come out and into the parking area and the out through. There's only one allowed cut in that whole area. It's approximately 1 00 feet from the east end, 200 feet from the other end. It will line up with the road across the way and so that's the only at least until some new road section is in the adjoining property. This cut out would be the only way the adjoining property could use for easement for construction purposes and we're perfectly willing to let them have that. The property I think is going to be pretty low density compared to the other usage in the area. You heard about the 300 units down the road a bit. It's going to put a lot more traffic out. The property between us and that has sold to my understanding going to be a KOA campground and storage units at least proposed and Mr. Edmond's property is up for sale. So all of this is rapidly changing and going to be commercial. Other than that I think we're pretty light use. We're willing and able to do all the things in the staff so we don't have anything we need changed. We'd just like to request that all of this be approved and we proceed. It is my MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 21 understanding by the way that the legals have been turned in with the - I don't know if they've gotten to the city attorney yet. Corrie: That's the question. Okay is there anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony on item 10 and 11, the annexation or the conditional use permit? Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, just a point of clarification and also a reference in the record was that there was not a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. I have one in my file. I have a transmittal letter of July 19th of those recommendations, and I want to make sure that those have been received. Corrie: What's the date? Gigray: The transmittal letter was the 19th of July. Corrie: Yes, I have that. Do you? Gigray: Then it would look like this? Of course that looks like the rest of them from a distance. I just wonder if the wrong ones were stapled on the cover sheet which can happen. Bird: I got the next item on mine. Rountree: Is that conditions for the annexation or the conditional use permit? Gigray: Conditional use permit and I also have the ones for the annexation. Wasn't it the conditional use permit that was confused? Bird: We don't have either one. Corrie: I have both of them. Bird: You have both of them? Corrie: Yeah. Bird: How come you got a different packet than we got? Corrie: I can't answer your question. The City Clerk might be able to. Gigray: For purposes of the record and of course with agreement of Councilor anyone representing other parties, for the purpose of this hearing you're welcome to use mine. ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 22 Corrie: You can use mine too. Berg: Mr. Mayor, this was a continued public hearing. I'm sure they are in your previous packet that you continued it from July 20th. Bentley: That was a long time ago. Berg: Well you tabled it for a month and they were attached to that item and we did not reproduce it. I hope you have it somewhere. (Inaudible) Corrie: Again I'll ask anyone from the public who want to testify at this point. Council do you have any questions of the applicant or the staff? Bentley: I have a question of staff and where is Gary? You should know better than to walk out. Gary on this project, is there any problems with sewer or water capacity or anything? Smith: No, sir. Bentley: Okay thank you. That's alii have. Rountree: I have a question for the applicant, and I'm a little confused and maybe you will want to use the overhead to explain this to me. The site plan indicates a curb cut or in this case access point pretty much mid lot. Aldridge: Actually it's 200 feet from the west line, 100 feet from the east line. It's an existing curb cut that's there. Rountree: It's an existing access point. Now explain to me again what's going to happen on what would be the east side. Aldridge: Yes, we will have an easement agreement with K.D. Roofing allowing us to have ingress and egress for overflow parking on limited - the current idea is to Sundays only and only for overflow when that back three acres turns into eventually to parking or something similar. They would have the ability to exit out from that. That would ease the burden on Teare Avenue. Because right now everything channels out through Teare which is not a large street and this would spread it a little bit. Rountree: So what's you're proposing is that there would be access from the current point of access or roughly 100 feet from the east border of the property through their parking lot and then down the east side of that parcel into the church parceL { '~ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 23 Aldridge: Yes that also allows some fire things that need to be done as well. They'll access through that. Rountree: I have got to tell you from my point of view, that's not a good idea. Bentley: Mr. Mayor if I could. Could you go over it so the people in the audience can see what you're referring to there and point it out. Aldridge: (Inaudible - off the microphone). And the concept is that it would be limited to days that it could happen. It's not intended to be a full time access of any sort. Quite frankly it's one of the reason for some of that offset is to make it a slower process to go through so it doesn't become more convenient than coming out the main entrance, but we felt that that was actually a better solution to eventual traffic problems on to Overland than the existing because they can backed up coming out because everybody comes out the same time. It's a very limited time it's backed up but when it's backed up, it slows down considerably. We reviewed that with staff who had as I understand had no problems with that. Bird: Run that by me again. How are you going to get out and come down the east side? (Inaudible) Bird: Yeah, but they don't own the property. Have you got an easement? Aldridge: We're selling this front property to K.D. Roofing. Bird: Yeah but you both have got the same width. So they're coming here, so they're going to give you a 20 foot easement down here to get into their stuff? Aldridge: (Inaudible) Bird: They're giving you that big of an easement from the property line over, 30 foot easement that you're going to maintain with gravel surface? Aldridge: No, we're going to pave it. Pave it initially that's much better usage of it. Bird: I see no problem with it, but I just was trying to figure it out. I didn't read that 30 foot easement. Okay. Corrie: Any further questions? ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 24 Bird: I have none. Corrie: Thank you. Any questions? 1'1( entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Bird: Mr. Mayor I move we close the public hearings on the request for annexation of 4.6 acres for Treasure Valley Baptist Church, K.D. Roofing north of Overland Road, south of 1-84 and east of Teare Avenue and also to close the continued pubic hearing request for conditional use permit for church parking, recreational use, and contractors' business by Treasure Valley Baptist Church and K.D. Roofing, north of Overland Road, south of 1-84 and east of Teare Avenue. Corrie: Do I hear a second? Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second to close the public hearing on items 1 0 and 11. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. Rountree: Mr. Mayor could I have that motion repeated? I have not vote yet. Corrie: All right, Mr. Bird do you want to do it again? Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we close the public hearing of the request for annexation and zoning of 4.6 acres by Treasure Valley Baptist Church I K.D. Roofing, north of Overland Road, south of 1-84 and east of Teare Avenue and also the continued public hearing request for conditional use permit for church parking, recreational uses and contractors' business by Treasure Valley Baptist Church I K.D. Roofing, north of Overland Road, south of 1-84 and east of Teare Avenue. Corrie: That was the motion and second. Any further discussion? Bird: The third time it will cost you if I have to repeat it. Corrie: All we are doing is closing the public hearing. Any further discussion? Hearing none} all those in favor of closing the public hearing on items 1 0 and 11, say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Okay now I'll entertain a motion to Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the approval of the request for annexation and zoning for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the appropriate ordinance and development agreement. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 25 Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we have City Attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order related to the annexation and zoning of Treasure Valley Baptist Church. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law should include the conditions of staff, conditions of Planning and Zoning, and should further reflect that a cross connection or a cross circulation of traffic between these lots would not be allowed. Anderson: I'll second that. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree and second by Mr. Anderson the motion as presented by Mr. Rountree. Any further discussion? Bird: Yeah, Mr. Mayor. Does this include the K.D. Roofing too? You didn't include K.D. Roofing. Rountree: This is just annexation and zoning. Bird: It's for the two of them, and I understand with the annexation and stuff what your motion says is that we don't allow that 30 foot easement. Is that right? Rountree: If I understand the item correctly, it's annexation and zoning for 4.6 acres, which includes both the Treasure Valley Baptist and K.D. Roofing. Bird: Yeah and your motion did not say K.D. Roofing. Rountree: No, I didn't indicate K.D. Roofing. Bird: But you are including that? Rountree: It includes it in item number 10 yes. Bird: And you also are not allowing the 30 foot right-of-way for relief on to Overland with your motion? Rountree: That's the intent of my motion. Bird: Okay. Corrie: Any other discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 NAY. ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 26 Corrie: Okay, I'll entertain a motion now to hold the action for the request for conditional use permit for the church parking until the appropriate Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law have been presented to the Council next meeting. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we table the request for conditional use permit until the next Council meeting of 9/7. Corrie: Is there a second to that motion? Bird: I'll second it. Corrie: Motion made and second that we table item number 11 request for conditional use permit until we get the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the annexation and zoning. Any further discussion? Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I believe we could have Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order and just hold the Decision and Order and recommendation and decision on the conditional use permit. Corrie: You could. Bird: Don't we have to have the development agreement first Charlie too before we can pass on this? That would be included with the Findings and Facts. Right? Rountree: Yeah. It saves the applicant some time. Bird: Yeah so that has to be on the agenda before item 11 is. Bentley: I would amend my motion to reflect that. Bird: I'll second it. Corrie: Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bentley: Mr. Mayor I move we take a ten minute break. Bird: I'll second that. Corrie: We'll be back at ten minutes after 8:00. (TEN MINUTE RECESS TAKEN) ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 27 12. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR USE OF EXISTING BUILDING FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL-BY CAPITAL CHRISTIAN CENTER-NORTH OF FAIRVIEW & WEST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite staff comments first. Siddoway: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, this application is for the Capital Christian Center. They are proposing to do a private school at the existing site. The site is located north of Fairview along Hickory Way about a quarter mile west of Eagle Road. You have a copy of the recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission in your packets dated August 16th. We would refer you to that. The major issues discussed that night including complying with all uniform building and fire codes, payment of any additional water and sewer assessments, fencing and buffering issues to adjacent neighborhoods, prohibiting parking on unpaved areas, and signage would need to be approved through a separate permit. This shows the configuration of the existing site. This would be Fairview down here. ThereJs a lawn area down in front. The existing building is here with the parking open fields. The baseball field is currently used by the Little League and an amphitheater. That is all the staff comments. Corrie: Okay. Is the applicant here this evening? Reams: Mr. Mayor and Council members, my name is Randy Reams. I am an employee of Capital Christian Center as facilities manager and administrator. Capital Christian Center being located at 2760 E. Fairview, Meridian. What we are simply requesting is a conditional use permit to basically it changes the zoning of our building. We want to use the building as is existing after which we've already received bids to bring it up to fire code and take that and use it in the first few years for those elementary age school, probably kindergarten, first grade, second grade and as the kids grow into their ages, each year you would add a grade as time goes on. As far as impact on the area, you know we don't expect to see 100 kids in the first few years because that's the way schooling goes and we put on a weekend we put 1400 people in and out of our facilities on a weekend. So the impact as far as traffic or getting back to the area, I donJt think it would change anything. As far as the things that staff had mentioned, signage, we really don't have any at this point. We're in the process of having those drawings and we realize they have to go through P & Z. Parking and unpaved areas, that's a concern I believe by Planning and Zoning particularly Shari Stiles because we had the baseball field you see back there - (inaudible) no charge to the Northwest Little League and for a while there parents and kids would park in that empty field you see just north of the baseball field and so we built some berms there to stop parents from parking there in the field and stuff at ball games and I think that was Shari's concern mostly. As far as fencing goes, I'm not for sure what else we talked about that in the Planning and Zoning meeting. There's fencing on the last I'd say quarter maybe third of MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 28 the back northwest corner, back by the baseball field. There's fencing there and for the rest of the way, a berm a landscape berm that sort of buffers between us and the neighbors behind us. It's a pretty simple straight forward thing. We just want to use the building that we're in to be able to have a school. Corrie: Okay, thank you. Is there anyone else from the pubic who would like to issue testimony in the request for conditional use permit? Council any questions of the applicant or staff for the record? Okay, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing on item number 12. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to close the public hearing on item number 12. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Any further discussion? If none, I'll entertain a motion for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the appropriate order. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that we have city attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order and incorporate staff comments, the Planning and Zoning comments, and to reflect favorably on the request for conditional use permit for private school. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird to approve the request for conditional use permit including the staff reports and a favorable recommendation in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 13. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR FINAL PLAT OF PACKARD NO.1, PHASE 2 BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING - NORTH OF FAIRVIEW AND WEST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite staff comments first. ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 29 Hawkins-Clark: The only staff comment on this is the overhead shows the boundaries of the subdivision that is requested by the applicant to have an extension of the submission of the final plat. You mayor may not have the names of these subdivisions down better than I, but Packard 2 was at one point referred to Packard 1, phase 2. My understanding is that this is now Packard No.2 and up here to the northwest is now called Packard Acres. But the current request before you for a time extension is for this phase here to connect. Again the future elementary school is located right up here with the proposed access up through Packard to that. There have been meetings between staff and the applicant including Public Works and Planning and Zoning where it was discussed and the staff was supportive of that at that time to approve the extension. I was unfortunately not at that meeting. Shari Stiles was there. The applicant could best say if there was a time frame that was talked about. I leave that up to the applicant to talk about. Corrie: The applicant would like to - Tealey: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, my name is Pat Tealey, and I'm representing the developer for this project. Mr. Wirt Edmonds and Mr. Craig Groves. This project has been approved in its form and final plat last year, but because of ownership problems it could proceed forward in a timely manner. Those ownership problems have now been solved and Mr. Craig Groves is the partner with Mr. Edmonds now, and Mr. Sigmont is no longer part of this project. We feel we have a good project for the City of Meridian. It's been approved in the past. We are asking for your variance for this time extension. The sewer and water plans are approved for this thing and ready for construction. The final plat has been approved, and the road plans have been approved by ACHD. If we were to assume that we were to get your okay tonight, and we would be able to proceed with this thing in a very timely manner such that we would be able to get a preconstruction meeting as soon as possible. All the pieces are in place for this thing to start now. All the approvals - they have been reapproved by the City of Meridian and reapproved by the Ada County Highway District. As stated by staff this is one of the piece in a jigsaw puzzle for phases for these two parcels of ground that we're initially called Packard Subdivision No. 1 and then divided into phases and then to the north was Packard Subdivision No.2 divided into phases. Because of problems with the County Engineer and the naming of plats, we've decided to try to separate them now so that Packard Acres will be to the north and Packard Subdivision No.1, 2, 3, and 4 will be on the south 40 acres there. We also have in for approval to the City of Meridian, Packard Subdivision No.3, which is an extension of No.2 that will take the access and utilities over to the new school site which wants to start this October. It is very important for us to get into the ground. We have agreements with the School District that will be in place assuming this approval that will extend the utilities and the access to the school site. They need to be under construction by October and which I guess would lead us to the fact that we have to start immediately to get their utilities in the ground so they can start construction. We also have in for approval Packard Acres MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 30 No. 1 which is directly north of the Packard Subdivision No.2 in order to keep out time approvals going on that preliminary plat. So there will be a lot of action out here shortly. Ownership was a problem in the past. It got to an impasse where the people just couldn't work together and we apologize to the City of Meridian for not doing this in a timely manner, but it was something that was out of our control. (End of Tape) Bentley: Yes, I received a couple of phone calls over the high weeds along Wingate, and the problems with the property over there. Tealey: Were there specific problems? Bentley: Yeah, they don't appreciate the weed seeds blowing over into their- Tealey: We've cut the weeds once this year, and I just got a call Mr. Belmont from the Fire Department today, and those weeds will be cut again this year. I'm sure if you talk to Mr. Edmonds or Mr. Groves who are here, if you want them cut this week, they'll be cut this week. Bentley: Weill think they need to take care of it besides a fire hazard, it's unsightly to the neighbors there, and they've got their houses there and they're not too fond of the weeds that have been blowing over into their yards. We've been receiving calls on them. Tealey: I believe I was at the Planning and Zoning Department when you received one of those calls. I believe when you called the Planning and Zoning Department to say something about you know that there was evidently construction happening out there that wasn't in the platted areas and something about fences, and I believe the person from the planning department went out there immediately and none of that was true. Bentley: Weill think there's been some confusion over the renaming and the - Tealey: There may well have been, and we'll get out there - excuse me, not me, I won't cut the weeds, but Mr. Edmonds or Mr. Groves, the owners will cut the weeds. Rountree: I want to see that. Bentley: Thank you. Corrie: Any other questions at this time? Okay, thank you. Is there anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony in this request for a variance? Alleman: My name is Vern Alleman. My address 2101 E. Ustick, Meridian. I have a question. How can they change it when they already got a plat I think a preliminary plat ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 31 for Packard Subdivision NO.2 and change it now at this point to another deal without some public hearing and so forth? To me there is confusion on this because of the way they have got Packard Subdivision NO.2 as you see drawn there and yet to the north of that is the old Packard No.2, which is as far as I'm concerned is still in existence, and their legal description that they show on this for this variance is actually the legal description for Packard NO.2 as I know it. Now how can they change this without public input or public knowledge from one subdivision without any notice or we never knew what was going on in that respect. To me I think it has to be some public comment and period to comment and so forth if they're going to change the name of the subdivision. My concern is that I was under the impression when they said Packard Subdivision No. 2, that's the one that I know of is north of there. And the legal description was for Packard No.2, which is north of there which is on this application and to me that is wrong. If they're applying for - to me they should have had it as the southeast quarter of that section instead of the northwest. So it could easily be confused to be the old Packard No. 2 asking for a variance and I would welcome any comment as to how they can change this without - Bird: Could you please show us on the map what you're talking about where the old Packard No. 2 was? Alleman: Okay this is the old Packard NO.2. Bird: And the legal description they got on this application is for that area up there? Alleman: For this right here, yes. This is over here is in the north - this is in the southeast section right here. This is in the northwest most of it is in the northwest section. Bird: And they're saying Packard Subdivision No.2 is the one with the arrow pointed to it, and that's where they're asking for the variance. But the legal description is actually north of that. Alleman: The legal description that they put on their application is for this old Packard NO.2 that they're calling. Packard Subdivision NO.2. Corrie: All right we'll see if we can get your questions - Steve, can you Siddoway: Yes Mr. Mayor and Council, I believe I can shed some light on this. The actual legal description that's in the packet correctly describes it as the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section five. The error that I believe is being referred is on the application form where it simply says the northwest quarter of section five. They inadvertently eliminated the southeast quarter. The northwest quarter of section five is where the old original Packard No. 2 is. The application that you have before you ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 32 tonight is in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section five as shown in the legal description, so that's the reason for confusion. It's just noted incorrectly on the application form. Bird: It has been corrected on the application form? Siddoway: It is not corrected on the application form. It is in correct on the application form, but it is correct on the legal description, which is attached. From Tealey's Land Surveying dated September 15th, it says description for Packard property annexation parcel. That legal description is correct for the subdivision that's before you tonight. Corrie: Is there anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony on item number 13? Yes, sir. Sharp: I'm Dale Sharp, 2445 Wingate Lane. I had a lot of confusion on this and I told Mr. Bentley on this and for some reason there was some indication that building was being illegally done on these and that was not - we talked about it later, and it was not but there is confusion here because the subdivision no. 1 is all that section south of the lateral there originally and subdivision no. 2 would be on the Borup's property just north and then across Wingate Lane which Wingate Lane is a private road there and that is a concern too because these weeds we are being unduly impacted by all these weeds that are blowing dry weeds and blowing over on to my property down the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District road which is on my property, getting into my ditches and going down and it's a good thing I was there to - or I probably wouldn't have even got mail service because there's so many weeds that was coming from that Packard Subdivision No. 1 and so that's why we've been pushing for a fence to give us a buffer along Wingate Lane there which is suppose to be put up there anyway. And I don't know we just don't go ahead and do that. You've already put in sewer across there into Packard Subdivision No.2 so I don't know why we can't put a chain link fence along Wingate Lane there and give us a little buffer there from not only the weeds but the debris and so forth from the development. So that would show a little bit of commitment from the developers that they're trying to protect the neighbors. Corrie: Okay thank you, sir. Anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony? Sharp: Gentlemen, Helen Sharp 2445 Wingate Lane. I'm glad to see that they're finally getting some continuity and they will be able to start developing. This has been going on for a long time. And with the weed etc and the traffic now going on the south of our property, I'm sure it's going to get even worse and hoping they'll address this. My biggest concern is who enforces once these things are granted? And here again we ask questions and we don't seem to get answers. Like I say we're going to do this, we're going to do that. You have to do this, you have to do that and we're saying okay MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 33 what is that they have to do and who is going to enforce that they do that? I mean for those of us who've been involved in this for several years, it's getting a little bit redundant and repetitive and a pain in the neck, and I would like to see that someone takes a hold of it and makes sure that things are enforced the way they are supposed to be. Thank you. Corrie: Thank you Mrs. Sharp. Anyone else from the public? Yes, sir. Alleman: In regards to the weeds, there has not been any mowing or anything done since the time that they worked on the sewer. And if they have, I would like to have them show me what they did and who done it. Because there's not any indication and I live right there and I can see it everyday so I can see no signs of anything being done with the weeds. Corrie: Is there anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony that hasn't already? Groves: Mayor, Council, my name is Craig Groves. I apologize for the informal business attire here. We had some eight year olds and six year old soccer players that took priority this evening. I wanted to go on record and let you know that it's both my desire and Mr. Edmond's desire to be good neighbors with Mr. Alleman and Mr. and Mrs. Sharp. We'll make our efforts to meet with them and work out all these issues in a professional manner. I want to publicly apologize to them for any of the problems that they've experienced in the past and to go on record to assure them that we'll work with them professionally to take care of the weeds, take care of the fencing issue. As it was stated earlier, we're planning on moving forward with the Packard Acres. When that project comes to reality, Mr. and Mrs. Sharp's fencing issue will be resolved at that point. Corrie: Okay are you going to put up the chain link fence as well? Groves: We'll have to review the conditions for that, but whatever the conditions that were in the original project, we'll take care of. Bird: Mr. Groves, was it because of the change in ownership that this variance is being asked for? Groves: Yeah. Bird: It had time to get it taken care of and it was just the change in ownership? Groves: Yes, sir. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 34 Bird: Okay thanks. Corrie: Those are your special circumstances that you're asking for? Groves: Yes, sir. Corrie: Thank you. Mr. Tealey, you get the last hurrah. Tealey: In the conditions of approval for the Packard Acres, which is in the northern portion of this subdivision, those names have been changed at the request of the County Engineer. We're not trying to confuse anybody. We're trying to maybe eliminate some confusion by at least getting a different name in there rather than just a numeral. The County Engineer requires that we have a different name for those subdivision. We can't call them phases. He won't allow that. In the conditions of approval for Packard Acres which is adjacent to the Sharp's property, we submitted a fencing exhibit and as part of the package that the staff has and in those conditions when we build that phase of the subdivision which will be one of the phases that we just submitted to the City for approval final plat approval. We will be building fences that they are concerned about. And there's a specific fence type called out for that portion of their property and I don't recall what it is, but it's on that exhibit and is part of the planning staffs package and the City will ensure that we do this. If we don't do it, they will deny occupancy permits, I mean it doesn't do us any good not to build a fence and that's really pretty small item when it comes down to it and again in talking with Mr. Edmonds, if the City needed to see a receipt for when we mowed the weeds there this year, he'll bring it over to you. We will again he will be out there in the very near future to mow the weeds that are there now. Corrie: Any other questions? Any other questions of staff Council? Mr. Bentley? Bentley: I'm just wondering if we had an extension on this in the past? Rountree: This would be their first one. Bird: We had one a year ago, but I don't know if it was on this particular thing, but we had another one in August a year ago. I don't know if it's for the same one. Hawkins-Clark: My understanding is that Packard No. 1 which would encompass that complete section there two other phases that aren't shown. City Council gave approval for all phases in August of '95. Then you approved the final plat for number one in July of '96. You did give a one year extension to record the final plat for that first phase which is under construction and you gave that approval for a one year extension in '97. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 35 Bird: We had an extension on this same development last August at one time. I might be off a month or two, but it was - Hawkins-Clark: For the current Packard Subdivision No.2 as was pointed up there? Bird: Maybe he can clear me up. Tealey: That was for the third phase of Packard. Bird: That was the third phase? Tealey: Yes. Bird: I knew it was one of them. I don't know. That's what I'm saying. We did have an extension. I was just wondering if this last August I believe it was that we had an extension for one phase, and I couldn't remember which phase it was. Tealey: It was for the third phase of this - Bird: Of this existing thing. Tealey: Yes. Bird: It's not phase two there. Tealey: The odd thing about it is that we were in conformance through the time extension for phase number three. In our submittal for phase number three now we're in conformance with phase number three, but phase two has fallen out of conformance because of this change in ownership. So there's this break in the continuity of this thing so we got to get back and like I say, aside from selecting a contractor, we're ready to go to work on phase number two right now and phase number three. Bird: I just wanted to get it clear that whether this one was the same one that we had given a year's extension on last August. Okay thank you. Corrie: Any other questions for staff? Okay, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing on item number 13. Bird: So moved. Rountree: Second. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 36 Corrie: Motion made and second to close the public hearing on item 13. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Okay I'll entertain a motion on the request for variance for time extension. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we grant a one time one year extension for what is now being called Packard Subdivision No.2. Bird: Findings? Rountree: And the City Attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Resolution to reflect that approval. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird to approve the request for variance time extension for one year for Packard Subdivision which is now No.2 and order the City Attorney to draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the proper order on the acceptance. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 14. PUBLIC HEARI.NG: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION IN MAWS NO.3 SUBDIVISION BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING - NORTH OF PINE AND WEST OF ADKINS AVENUE: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and hear from the staff on this request for variance. Siddoway: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, Maws No.3 Subdivision is located here near the intersection of Pine and Locust Grove. The existing phases of Maws addition numbers one and two are adjacent to it right here. Maws No 3 is this linear row of lots right here. It's adjacent to Danbury Fair Subdivision, and the applicant tonight is for a variance to the requirement for pressurized irrigation. Condition 2.20 of the approved preliminary plat states that City Council will have to review a variance request to this requirement to provide pressurized irrigation so this application before you tonight is in response to that condition. The condition further states that the applicant shall investigate the feasibility of hooking up pressurized irrigation to Danbury Fair Subdivision's irrigation system. I believe the applicant is prepared to show that they ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 37 have contacted them regarding that and we would request that that evidence be submitted tonight. Staff feels strongly that a pressurized irrigation system should be provided to Maws No.3 if at all feasible by hooking up to Danbury Fair or through repurchasing the water rights that originally belonged to the parcel. However if the Council agrees to grant the variance tonight, the applicant should be required to pay well development fees. That's our recommendation. Corrie: Okay, since we have the public hearing open is the applicant here tonight? Pavlick: Mr. Mayor and Council, my name is Richard Pavlick with Tealey's Land Surveying. My office is at 915 W. Jefferson in Boise. This variance was in response to the single condition that is an obstacle for Maws No.3 proceeding and I think there's previous testimony that has been given in relationship to the sequence of events that have lead to where we are on this subdivision that makes it impossible for us to provide pressurized irrigation. Previous ordinances granted the option or gave the option to developers to in fact provide the option of either providing pressurized irrigation or paying well development fees in lieu of that pressurized irrigation system. That was in 1993, I think we've gone through that discussion and shown that well development fees had been paid for the two previous phases. We've been asked to give proof of making an inquiry as to whether or not it is feasible to in fact get cannel water to this piece of property. Mr. Gregory who is in fact here who is one of the partners in the development made an inquiry to Nampa Meridian Irrigation District and received a letter back from them stating that it's not available at this time given the limitations of the existing structure. They did go on to say that if an LID including the full Danbury Subdivision were conducted that there would be a possibility. However the likelihood of an LID being approved for increasing the capacity of a pump and the system provide for these seven lots is just not feasible. I'd like to present for your review the letter that we've received. I think to us in terms of reviewing this is unattainable in terms of being able to achieve that improvement and we would agree to follow through on the original conditions of approval of the preliminary plat of Maws and that be that well development fees be paid to the City of Meridian for this phase as it was paid for the two previous phases. If there's any questions, I'd be happy to answer them or if there's anything that Mr. Gregory can address, he would be happy to address questions. Corrie: Any questions at this time? Bird: That letter is for records of the public hearing? I have none. Corrie: Is there anyone else from the public who would like to testify? Mr. Gregory is he here, does he want to say anything? Do you want to say anything? You don't have to. It's up to you. Gregory: Steve Gregory, 1202 Sandy Court, Meridian. I did talk with the President of the Danbury Fair Homeowners Association about hooking on to the pressurized irrigation system. He didn't feel that they had enough capacity with their current system to allow any other lots to be hooked on other than what they already had set up with their current system. Is there any other questions? (- MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 38 Corrie: Addition number one and number two doesn't have pressurized irrigation system now because of the well fees? Gregory: No, sir, I paid the well development fees on one and two and I vacated the water rights for the entire parcel all at one time. I didn't realize in '92 or '93, I vacated the water rights for the entire parcel all at once because that was the legal thing to do at that time and paid the well development fees and I didn't realize that things would change. Corrie: Okay, any questions? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony on item number 14? Hearing none, Council any questions of staff? Hearing none, 1'(1 entertain a motion to close the public hearing on item number 14. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to close the public hearing on item number 14 request for variance for pressurized irrigation in Maws No.3 Subdivision. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Any further discussion? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on the request for variance on item number 14. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we have the City Attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the variance for pressurized irrigation for Maws Sub. No.3 and to reflect the efforts of the applicant to coordinate with the adjacent subdivision, Nampa Meridian Irrigation District, their inability to find a resolution of pressurized irrigation system in question and that the finding also reflect that the applicant will be subject to well development fee established by the Meridian Water Department. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird on the request for variance as stated in the motion. Any further discussion? Anderson: Mr. Mayor I would just like to go on record I guess as fundamentally as being opposed to that option having living in a subdivision that these well development fees were substituted in lieu of putting in a pressurized irrigation system. Once it's done like that, the homeowners that live there are stuck with that the rest of the time and I think it's just a poor option. I think they have been offered an option of creating an LID and increasing the pump capacity in this particular subdivision, and it would be my preference that they pursue that. Corrie: Okay, any further discussion? Hearing none - (-~ ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 39 Rountree: Do you want my motion amended or reflect that, I don't have a problem with that either. Anderson: (Inaudible) Corrie: Do you want to change your motion Mr. Rountree? Rountree: I let it stand as is and see how it floats. Corrie: All right, motion is on the floor by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird. Any further discussion? All in favor of the original motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: 2 AYES, 2 NAYS. Corrie: Thanks a lot. I don't think you pay the Mayor enough. Okay, I'm going to vote yes in this case on the original motion. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 2 NAYS. (MAYOR TIE BREAKER) 15. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 2.0 ACRES OF LAND FOR OFFICE USE (I-L ZONING) FOR JACKSON'S FOOD STORES-NORTH OF FRANKLIN ROAD & EAST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) 16. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PUD TO ALLOW OFFICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ON ADJOINING SITE FOR JACKSON'S FOOD STORES-NORTH OF FRANKLIN ROAD & EAST OF EAGLE ROAD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: Again we're trying to see if we can't combine the two. If we have any objections by the City Council, the applicant or any of the persons who might be testifying in this. Does anyone have any objections to doing 15 and 16 public hearing open for both of them? All right, ('II open the public hearing on items 15 and 16 and invite staff comments first. Hawkins-Clark: Again dealing with the annexation first, this commercial commerce park subdivision bounded by Eagle Road on the west. Albertson's is currently here. The two pieces that are adjacent to Eagle Road in this subdivision here and to the south are both still in the county. This piece that is cross (inaudible) there is the two acre parcel and currently has I believe a Sherwin Williams facility warehouse on the front of that piece. The back north part of it is currently vacant, so the request for annexation is for the entire piece. Staff feels it's a good opportunity to get these in fill, enclave county pieces in, and this commerce park still has two or three - actually this piece here is also in the county, so it's a good step forward. City services are already stubbed there. They just need to extend them out. There has been no development agreement requested on this piece; is that correct Bill to your understanding? As I was looking through this - ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 40 Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, Brad as I see the recommendations to the City Council, I thought an appropriate question of staff was whether or not the requested conditions could be enforced by just simply the enforcement of city ordinances, therefore not being necessary that there be a development agreement with this application. Hawkins-Clark: Okay. The I-L, the light industrial zoning, is requested. The ordinance does require some warehousing to be combined in order to really qualify for a light industrial zone. You cannot just have office space. In this case it is predominantly an office building that they are proposing, however, staff feel that with the proposed 2 to 3,000 square feet of warehouse again here's the Sherwin Williams. With the combined office warehouse space, it well qualifies for the light industrial. We'd like to see that as a permanent condition as far as the use in order to stay as a conforming use. This would make this entire piece technically a planned unit development, which is the conditional use item you have next, because of the two buildings on a single lot. Ten percent open space which in this case is the majority of the landscaping is met that requirement for planned unit development. The ditch which is in the Settlers Irrigation District back here on this north side is to my understanding I think the applicant said this evening not within the boundaries of their subdivision. That tiling issue will be left up to Mr. Van Auker I believe. That is the staff's comments. Thanks. Corrie: This is a public hearing, is the applicant here tonight? Benning: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, I'm Dale Benning Architect for Jackson's Food Stores, and I would like to answer any questions that you might have about our application. Corrie: Okay, any questions? Okay anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony on item number 15 and 16? Okay, hearing none, Council do you have any questions of staff? Any other questions? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing on item number 15 and 16. Bird: So moved. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to close the public hearing on item 15 and 16. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Very much the same thing gentlemen with the annexation and zoning and then to hold the findings of fact and conclusion and order with the request for conditional use permit by (inaudible). So if there's no other discussion, I'll entertain a motion on the request for annexation and zoning of the 2.0 acres of land. Bentley: Mrw Mayor I move we instruct the City Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the annexation and zoning of 2.0 acres for Jackson's and the ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 41 Order of Decision and at the same time that we prepare findings for the conditional use permit and hold the order of decision until welre through with the annexation. Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Rountree to approve the annexation and zoning and have the attorney draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and no development agreement in this case and also the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and order for the conditional use permit and to hold that until after the annexation and zoning. Gigray: Mr. Mayor, question and point of procedure and information. Councilman Bentley, would this include in your recommendation or in the findings that we would include the conditions that are recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission? Bentley: Yes, thank you. Corrie: All right, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 17. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PARTIAL EASEMENT VACATION IN ENGLEWOOD CREEK NO.2 SUBDIVISION BY BRIAN LEE CONSTRUCTION - LOT 17, BLOCK 6: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE ORDER TO APPROVE) Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing and invite staff comments first. Gigray: Mr. Mayor just a point of procedure and information while staff is coming with the permission of the Mayor and Council. Just a note, ifs our advice and I think it's been the practice of the city that with regards to the vacation of easements, they're governed under Idaho Code S 50-1325, which says they have to be done in the same manner as streets. So what this public hearing is about and what the Council is considering is whether or not the city would its permission to the vacation of the easements and the proposed orders that we've done in the past associated with easements is including notice to applicants that they still have to make an application to ACHD for the vacation of the easement. Corrie: Thank you Mr. Gigray. Siddoway: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, this vacation application for this easement is in Englewood Subdivision. We view it mostly as a formality to clean up an existing easement situation. To give you a little history, a home was built over an existing sewer main with an easement, and the sewer has been since relocated to the other side of the house at the expense of the developer and the city is no longer in need of the 20 foot wide easement as shown on the recorded plat. A new easement has already been dedicated for the new sewer location, so this application before you tonight is to vacate ten feet of the 20 foot wide sewer easement to allow the house to remain where it currently is and is recommended for approval. The Public Works ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 42 Department has reviewed and approved the legal descriptions for the easements, however I know Gary Smith also has some corrections that need to be made. Smith: Mr. Mayor and Council members, part of the documents that have been prepared for this request principally the recommendation to City Council has listed the wrong lot number as to the location of the vacation of easement. The reference in the introduction to the recommendation to City Council states that it is lot 17 of block 6. It should be lot 18 of block 6 in item number one. Item number five on page one, the proposed site of the requested easement and the word vacation should be inserted in there is lot 18 of block 6 of the Englewood Creek Subdivision. If you're following along with me on that. Okay. That's supported by the drawing that's on the overhead on the screen. Lot 18 is to the left as numbered and the existing sewer easement was totally on lot 18 at the platting stage of the subdivision. As Steve stated to you in his presentation, that sewer line has now been moved to the east and that portion that is cross hatched on the drawing is the portion requested being made to vacate on lot 18 of block 6. Corrie: I believe item 8 needs to be changed too. Smith: Yes, correct. Item number 8 also needs to be changed to lot 18 of block 6 and that is the location of the requested vacation of the easement. One other thing I might mention I believe that Steve mentioned that the developer had paid for this relocation and actually the builder of the lot has paid for that relocation, which is just a clarification for the record. I don't think I had anything else. I know the folks that have the lot and the house are in a real pickle as far as closing on their loan. I'm not sure what running this back through the highway district, how that's going to impact their timing. I understand what Mr. Gigray is saying, and he's correct, that's his line of work and that's what the statute as far as I know says. It is to be vacated in the same manner as road rights-of-way. I think it's a formality that is not really having any effect on this particular request. As far as the highway district, the last one that went through the highway district in Meridian Greens, they had no comment on it, and it was outside the road right-of-way similar to this one. I guess that's my only concern is what the owners of the house what their situation is as far as their closing of their loan. I know it has been a real trial for them. That's alii have. Thank you. Corrie: This is a public hearing. Would you like to come up? Lee: Brian Lee of Brian Lee Construction, and instance in which we came in is we were given a plot and the legal descriptions were not written and when we called for verification or asked for more legal print on it, we were denied it, and the only verification we could get was a standard ten foot easement, so we built the house according to the ten foot easement we were given. It was approved by the Meridian City Inspectors before concrete and what not and as he stated, obviously there was a sewer line underneath the house and it was at the cost of myself. The situation we1re in now is we're not able to close on this loan and we've got construction interest and what not accruing until we can get this thing closed. At this point it's accruing real fast, so ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 43 we'd just like to get the thing closed and so we can get the homeowners locked in so they can still qualify for the house, and that's my only remarks. Thanks. Corrie: Anyone else from the public would like to issue testimony? Brown: My name is Craig Brown. I currently reside at lot 18. We are not locked in though on our loan. We have been issued a permit of occupancy from the city and from the builder Brian Lee and what we are concerned about is being able to close in a timely manner and not losing our interest rate and opportunity to purchase the house. Is there any questions or anything? That's alii have. Corrie: When is your closing date? Brown: Well it was scheduled a couple of months ago, and Pioneer Title would not close on the house because this has not been finalized. So it will happen as soon as this is finalized whenever that happens. Corrie: Thank you Craig. Anyone else from the public who would like to issue testimony here? Okay, Mr. Gigray, it sounds like he's at catch 22 here. I don't know what is the legal procedure? They still have to go through the ACHD? (End of Tape) Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, my opinion is my opinion, and I think that the statute says it has to be vacated in the same manner that streets are. The Idaho Code has very specific provisions about abandonment and vacation of roads and streets. It's in title 40. I think there's some problems with title 50 and the relationship of this requirement with easements that are not in public ways. If you were a jurisdiction that was not in a county that had a countywide highway district, I think you'd be the highway district and you could do the whole sha-bang. I think it poses problems in Ada County and I think it's a matter that should go to the legislature for clarification. You go ahead and issue your order if you feel that this is in the public interest and there's no public interest served by keeping the easement, and order just simply says that they're on notice that they probably should file a petition with the Ada County Highway District so they're not confused. And that the City does not take the position that it's attempting to assurp any authority that may be with the Ada County Highway District. If they can get a closing and no one cares based on the city approval, I guess that happens, but I don't think we should be in a position to advise the applicant about what they legally should do. I think the city should just do what we do and then they can live with whatever that is. That's just my opinion. Corrie: Any other discussion? I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Bird: So moved. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second to close the public hearing on item number 17. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 44 Corrie: I will entertain a motion on the request for partial easement vacation in Englewood Creek No.2 Subdivision. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that we have the City Attorney prepare an order that approves the vacation of the easement in Englewood Creek No.2 Subdivision, lot 18 and include in that order the recommendations provided by Planning and Zoning Commission with the corrections as stated by City Engineer, Gary Smith for items number one to reflect lot 18, items number 5 to reflect the insertion of the word, "vacation" and reference to Jot 18 and in items number 8 to reflect lot 18. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird to have the City Attorney draw up the order with the corrections of staff as prepared for the request. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 18. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.77 ACRES (FOR CG ZONING) OF LAND FOR PROPOSED EAGLE ROAD PROFESSIONAL CENTER BY FERMOR, LLC- NORTH OF 1-84 & WEST OF EAGLE ROAD, EAST OF ALLEN STREET: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: I will open the public hearing and invite the staff comments first. Siddoway: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, this application before you is for annexation and zoning of a parcel of land for a project called Eagle Road Professional Center. It is located on this lot adjacent to Eagle Road just south of Jackson Food Stores, Texaco and just north of where the Holiday Inn Express is going in. St. Luke's is across Eagle Road on this side. The Eagle Partners project with the Chevron is to the north of it up here. There is Hubble Engineering going in here, and we have an application currently going in front of Planning and Zoning Commission on this lot here for a 60,000 square foot medical facility. This application before you tonight is for annexation and zoning only. A conditional use permit application has also been submitted for two medical office buildings and will be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission later this month. We do have that site plan for you tonight to understand their intent with the lot. Staff recommends approval of this application with the requirement that a development agreement to be required as a condition of the annexation to restrict signage, require 35 foot landscape setbacks along Eagle Road, and to restrict the types of uses on the lot to the office buildings as proposed. You have staff comments dated July 12, 1998 in your packet and that is all we have at this time. Corrie: Any other comments from staff? This is a public hearing. Do we have the applicant here tonight? ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 45 Simonds: Hi, I'm Andy Simonds with Fermor LLC, 2700 Airport Way in Boise. We agree and accept the recommendations to the City Council. So I'm just here to answer any questions you have. Corrie: Any questions from Council? Thank you very much. Anyone else who would like to issue testimony on item number 18? Hearing none, Council any questions of staff? Okay, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing on item number 18. Rountree: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to close the public hearing on item number 18. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Okay, I'll entertain a motion on the request for annexation and zoning of approximately 3.77 acres proposed by Eagle Road Professional Center. Rountree: Mr. Mayor, I move that we have City Attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order of the annexation and zoning for Eagle Road Professional Center to include the staff comments and recommendations from Planning and Zoning and to reflect favorably on the request for annexation and zoning as identified. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird to approve the request for annexation and zoning, to have the attorney draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the proper order. Do we need a development agreement on this one? Bird: Yes. Rountree: That's in the staffs comments. Corrie: All right. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 19. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THRU FOR MOXIE JAVA BY AVII L.L.C.-1800 N LOCUST GROVE RD: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: I'll open the pubic hearing at this time and invite the staff comments first. Siddoway: Mr. Mayor and Council, this is an application that has been before you previously on July 20th. The P & Z Commission originally recommended approval. City Council then denied the application for the drive through, citing safety concerns with the ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 46 existing drive through, and with cars exiting on to the loop road to the north. Also citing impacts to adjacent residential areas and limited car stacking depth for the proposed drive through. The drive through is located at Moxie Java in the Fred Meyer shopping complex on Locust Grove and Fairview. The site plan that's showing right now shows the existing configuration of the site. Moxie Java is located as the tenant in this portion of the pad. The proposed drive through would eliminate this walkway, landscaping and put in the drive through at that location. The applicant has prepared a proposed site plan and is prepared to discuss those with you tonight. The applicant requested and has been granted a public hearing to reconsider the application because they felt they had information that was not considered previously. Staff would point out the concerns that were stated previously by Shari Stiles regarding conflicts with cars exiting this new drive through with cars coming through the existing drive through along here. Also with the amount of stacking depth that may require cars to go out into the parking lot, and also consider that demand and stacking depth may grow as the City of Meridian grows. That's all we have at this time. I know that the applicant is prepared to address some of these concerns for you tonight. Corrie: Thank you. Is the representative for the request for Moxie Java here this evening? Haggett: Rob Haggett, 590 N. Maple Grove Road, Boise, Idaho 83704. Mayor and City Council, I'd like to start by thanking you for giving us the opportunity to testify tonight. I know this project has been heard in the past and was denied once by you, and I do appreciate the chance to actually testify and let you know what some of the things we've come up with on this. I think it's a good opportunity to help the customers at Moxie Java with putting in this drive through. Issues I think are very important with this project to consider and I hope you do consider these tonight. The hours of operation of the existing drive through at TCBY as compared to the proposed drive through for Moxie Java; Moxie Java does 80% of their business before noon. I think and I've watched this and the owner of Moxie Java is here tonight as well to verify that. TCBY does 750/0 of their daily business after 3:00 p.m. In fact they actually don't even open until 11 :00 a.m. in the morning. The conflict I think if you look at those numbers, it really lowers the possibility of a conflict between these two drive throughs. Also the TCBY drive through is located approximately 100 feet to the northwest corner of the building. TCBY is the west tenant in the building and Moxie Java is on the east portion. There are three tenants in between each one of them. The second issue which I think is very important as well that was brought up at the last City Council meeting is that this drive through would be a large impact on neighbors. To the north of the building is a vacant lot which is approximately four acres. Store It Rental Storage owns that property. They have current permit to build phase three storage on that eventually that property will be the I heard would be developed as a storage. I know that they are planning within the next 18 months to begin breaking ground on that. With the growth of Meridian, the next phase is soon to be underway. We also put out a petition on the counter at Moxie Java for about three days and I didn't expect to get the turn out that we did, but we had over ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 47 200 signatures of people that use Moxie Java and that are in support of a drive through for that space. I think there was in fact if you go through this petition, I've made a copy here (inaudible). Some of the addresses on there are also from neighbors that in the north subdivision. A third issue that I think is also very important is that what happens if Moxie Java moves out and this drive through has been approved? It was a question that I brought up to staff and they said well this permit is specific to Moxie Java or a coffee shop. It cannot be transferable to a sandwich shop or a deli or something that would have different hours of operation, so I think with looking at the different impacts there from the two drive throughs, that's definitely a consideration. Something we also did was in the first planning and zoning meeting with staff, we basically looked at opinions, and a lot of people said weill don't think this is a good place for a drive through and we were saying we think it is a good place for a drive through. I decided to go out and hire a professional engineering firm and I'm going to turn the rest of the time over to Dan Thompson from Earth Tec and he's done a study on this and will basically give his opinion as why this would be a viable position for a drive through. Corrie: Any questions from staff at this point? Bird: I have none. Bentley: I have one. Haggett: I will also be able to come up and answer any more questions. Anderson: I had one question. On that landscaping berm that's north of the building and between the loop road, what's the width of that? Haggett: In the proposed actually that is probably a better question for Mr. Thompson to answer because with the proposal of actually moving that landscaping out and keeping it there as a kind of a buffer area for the drive through. The original plan was to remove that landscaping, but I think we've decided to keep it there. Probably the best thing to do. Anderson: Okay, I'll listen to him. Corrie: I have one question. You mentioned that if Moxie Java leaves that the CUP goes with it. What do you intend to do with that? Are you going to replace it back the way it was? Haggett: Well my hope is that Moxie would not leave. In fact part of what we've discussed with the owner is that with this drive through, they would actually sign a renewal on a lease term of at least five years, hopefully ten years. If they happen to move and we were not able to fill the space with another coffee vendor, then we would just close up the drive through and probably put the door back in and replace the patio. Unless it was a user - we would actually have to come through the entire process again to get the drive through approved for a new user, so with what we've gone through at this point, I doubt we would do that. Corrie: Okay thank you. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 48 Thompson: Thank you, I'm Dan Thompson. I'm with Earth Tee, 1299 N. Orchard Street in Boise. Mr. Mayor, City Council, thank you for hearing us. Mr. Haggett requested that we look at his site and see if there's any issues that we could present to him that would address some of the concerns of the city staff and the City Council. The first thing we did was go out and take a look at the site, which wasn't a bad part of the job. I got to sit and have a cup of coffee during that one. But we looked at the site to how we thought it would really work out there, and what we did is kind of come up with a site plan that we felt would be workable and provide a usable site for a drive through. We tried to keep things straight. Some of the original plans had the cars kind of sweeping in and everything else and after looking at it, we said no we've got to kind of keep them straight to kind of reduce the number of movements, avoid people trying to move and if there is a conflict with another car, at least they're just trying to go in a straight line. We felt trying to get them back out on to the loop road exit them back out into the system and kept them moving in more of an orderly manner. One of the concerns of staff was conflicts between the TCBY drive in and this drive in. We've kind of addressed that with some signage and pavement marking which we do believe will address the issue and call people's attention there will be other cars coming and they should be watching for that and try to accommodate them. However, as Mr. Haggett pointed out, these two businesses have completed opposite peak hours. We think the evening traffic from the coffee shop is going to be very minimal conflicts with the traffic with the TCBY and vice versa. The next thing we wanted to do is look to see if there was any other movements that might be created by the cutting the landscape berm and something of that nature, and one of the concerns of the staff was vehicles trying to turn into that and I apologize, I did have some overheads which showed some turn templates we used using the (inaudible) a design vehicle for a passenger car, but I rushed out of my office running from meeting to meeting and I also prove to be unfounded fear this evening, but I did submit that to staff showing that movement and basically a car cannot make that movement and even come close to making it into that even if they go clear into the other lane. Now an astra designed vehicle is probably like a Cadillac. It's about 19 foot vehicle so that is a very difficult vehicle to make that movement. But if you go out there and drive that road, the proximity of the building to that road if you look out there the feeling you get is I can't make that turn. I just can't do that so we don't feel that people would really be trying to turn into there. Just to make sure we've shown some signage that we believe would discourage that even further and encourage to do that. The next concern the city had was with the stacking of this issue and I think there was some talk with ACHD about some required lengths and so we went and talked to ACHD about that and there's really no published data that says for a drive through you have to have ux" amount of feet for coffee shop, "x" amount of feet for that, so we went to a published document and that would be the ITO planning manual and use a little queuing theory on that one. Based on that we had the numbers they were using. They estimate that there will be a 20010 increase in traffic just by adding the drive through. We estimated an increase in growth for ten years and then we applied some queuing theory to that. I actually went to another Moxie Java that does have a drive through and saw how fast ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 49 they could service the cars to make sure we had an accurate number as to how fast they could do that. Based on those calculations we estimated an average queue of about three cars. We estimate 95% confidence of a maximum queue of about four cars. This is after ten years worth of growth. If we do that what we estimate again using the design vehicle which is a 19 foot car, which is as big as a Suburban is at this point. What we would see with car stacking into the marking parking area but not blocking it. Cars could get through under our estimation. Remember that's a 950lb queued Most of the time that queue is going to be three vehicles or less, which there is room to stack that in there. What we've shown from service window to the rear of the very end of the parking island is a little over 75 feet of storage in that area there. Easily to stack three cars and be on that. Again the way that parking lot is set up there the queuing does exceed even our calculations. It's going to infringe on the other parking businesses in that parking lot, not on Fred Meyer, not on any other businesses, not on any public roads. Since most of those businesses are not open much before 9:00. There's a hair dresser. We don't-see that as a serious issue with other businesses. One that we probably hurt the most would be Moxie Java with their walk in traffic. Those are the issues we really addressed at this time, and I would be happy to answer any questions that Council may have. Anderson: Where's the menu board located at for TCBY and where do you do your ordering? Isn't it about halfway down that building? Thompson: That is correct. Anderson: So a lot of people are going to be stopped there reading the menu for a while. How much room do you have there for stacking cars? Thompson: I'll have Rob Haggett address where that is located. Haggett: It's located approximately 40 feet from this northeast corner of the building. As we stated earlier I think the hours of operation we don't see that as being a problem. But the order board for TCBY is actually about the middle of the building. I haven't actually measured it, but I would say it's about the middle of the building and then their window is on the far side of the building. Anderson: The building length is how long? Haggett: 120 feet. Corrie: Any questions? Rountree: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Rountree. Rountree: You said, you testified that a car couldn't turn into that curb through the landscape area even if they were in the other lane making the turn, they couldn't make the turn into there. My question is then how do you get out of it? Bird: They go straight. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 50 Rountree: It's the same turning radius. If you go into the other lane. Haggett: This is a letter I submitted to staff which had some samples of work and I would submit this to Mr. Rountree. (Inaudible) is not possible and that is with the astra design vehicle. If you're taking a 90 degree turn out of here from there, (inaudible). Rountree: That clarifies it. You didn't state the (inaudible). Wouldn't it be just as critical to have a do not block pavement marking for vehicles moving north as you have for vehicles moving west through TCBY? Thompson: I agree that's critical. However I would certainly want any vehicle exiting out of there to make sure it's safe to proceed before they do. I would be more concerned to make sure it's safe to get on to the loop road than worrying about blocking the intersection. As far as this is not a striping plan by any means. It's certain something we want to work out in the final plans. Anderson: Is that a landscape berm? Thompson: It is. Anderson: Are you going to remove some of that shrubbery and flatten that for visibility? Thompson: The existing landscaping, they would have a sight distance problem that they would have to address. Anderson: And the speed limit on the loop road is what? Thompson: It's posted at 25. Anderson: Okay. Bird: I got a question on their permit, conditional use permit, their site plan was prepared by BRS Architecture. We still using that same site plan or do we have a new one because we have not received a new site plan. Thompson: Well this is the modified site plan. The site plan originally submitted, the existing site plan was prepared by BRS. We've modified this site plan as shown, which is the site plan that's proposed. Bird: Is there an exhibit? Siddoway: Sorry, Mr. Bird, I did not hear the question. I know it was in reference to the BRS. Bird: No, the new site plan that they're proposing right now is there an exhibit of it or are we still just doctoring up BRS's? Are we going off of things like this? Siddoway: They submitted these site plans to me yesterday, and I prepared these overheads with them. Thompson: We have not prepared a detailed site plan at this time. We wanted to make sure we had one. This is a conceptual plan that we would propose to offer. ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 51 Bird: How far up from your southeast corner is the window going to be? He said something about removing the door, which is probably 20 feet up the wall or something. 15 that what they plan on doing? Thompson: Council the window as shown here with that little outcrop, the existing door is actually right next to it, and I encouraged them to move that service window as far forward as possible. Bird: That's a good idea, because you can get a couple of cars in there. Thompson: It also works a little better with their service counter. 'Bird: I was just wondering what that was the little window there. Thank you. Corrie: Any other questions? Thank you. Anyone else would like to issue testimony in this request for conditional use permit? Hearing none, Council any other questions of staff or the people from the public hearing? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing on item number 19. Bentley: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to close the public hearing on item number 19. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Discussion? Bird: Mr. Mayor, I would like a procedure question. What we do if we pass this, we've got the Findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Theirs is based on the prepared BRS's drawings, and now we're being asked to do the conditional on another set of drawings that we don't have in our possession. What do we do Counselor? Gigray: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Bird, the decision that the City Council made before in denying the conditional use permit one of the Findings of Fact which was the center piece I believe of Council's action was item number ten of these findings. Of course I believe the concern and as I drafted those findings and listening to the deliberations of the Council that were raised were those points and those points were of course directed to the specific site plan that was directed which was a rather complete site plan with regards to where the location of various appurtenances of this facility would be and the traffic flow and so on. If you were going to be inclined to grant a conditional use permit if you find that these concerns have been resolved, then I would recommend you might consider fashioning conditions with regards to the site development of this property that would alleviate those concerns. If you feel that that's alleviated by the proposed site improvements that have been submitted here, that was why I believe the question was MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 52 this an exhibit? That could be referred to, whether that's detailed enough for you. If it isn't, and there's specific conditions that you would want as a consideration of granting it, you're going to have to articulate what those are. I prepare an order that has conditions of the conditional use permit that are going to set those out for you. Corrie: Okay did that answer your question, Keith? Bird: Yeah, I still got another question. I don't - I mean I have no problem with the drive through, don't get me wrong there, but I don't know how you can put something like that without more detail. I want to see footage and stuff on the drive through and how far up the window is going to be and for our records, I can't go off that proposed site improvement thing and pass it. I mean there is nothing on that. Gigray: Mr. Mayor, Council, just a point of procedure if the Council is of the same opinion as Councilman Bird is my recommendation would be that you might consider reopening the public hearing and that you might direct the applicant to present those final plans for your consideration and inclusion in the public hearing so that you might have the benefit of that detail in making a final decision. You just move to reconsider and open the public hearing back up if that's your decision. I don't know that that's what the other Council wants to do. Bird: I'm in favor of doing that. I don't want to hold the people up any longer on this deal, but is this the detailed site that you got? Do you have one that's got all the _ Siddoway: I do not have a more detailed site plan that shows window elevations and such. Bird: No, I don't care about the elevation or anything. I want from the corner of the building how far up this is and how far the reader board is, how wide that thing is. Is that 50 feet wide or is it 5 feet wide? Between the berm and the building and stuff like that. I want to see that. For the City, I think we need that on file. I mean we're looking at this thing right here. We don't know what we got. I mean that two crosses up there means that's the drive through window, but you know it might be three quarters of the way up or two thirds of the building. I want some footage and some stuff lined out on a site plan. I want a real site plan if I'm going to pass something like this and I have no problem with passing it, but I want a decent set of prints, sites to look at. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would like to make some comments. First of all, I sympathize with the applicant in this situation. Unfortunately I think that this building and the configuration on this particular lot just does not lend itself well to separate drive ups. If it had more space around it, I would be more amenable to it. I think even the proposal that we're looking at here tonight and I appreciate you coming back and bringing that to us and letting us look at that. I personally do not think it's a good situation where we have two lanes crossing one another. We're making an intersection in a very tight space. I think we create a traffic hazard and a safety issue allowing these people to come out on the loop road there. The landscaping issue to me and the line of sight is going to be a safety concern. I know that's posted at 25 but I've been through there lots of times MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 171 1999 PAGE 53 when people are going a lot faster than 25. I think we're going to play on people's nerves a little bit when they're trying to get in line. They're trying to pay attention, they're trying to read the reader board or a menu board and what they're going to be ordering and there's someone else crossing across the same path even though the percentages are 750/0 you still got 250/0 of the people that there's a possible conflict there. So my personal feeling is that this is just not a good option and I sympathize with you and maybe a different location or a different configuration, but I would not be in favor of having two drive ups that cross one another in this kind of situation. That's my thoughts. Corrie: Anyone else? Rountree: After that I don't have anything more to say. Bentley: I just say I would agree with Councilman Anderson. We turned this project down before for some of the same reasons, and even though they've made a concerted effort to try and improve it, I just don't think it's going to fly. Thank you. Corrie: Any other comments? Okay, I'll entertain a motion on the request for conditional use permit Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I move we instruct the City Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and have that decision reflect denial of the application for a drive through for Moxie Java. Anderson: Second that. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Bentley second by Mr. Anderson to have the attorney draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for denial of the conditional use permit for the drive through at Moxie Java. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 NAY. Corrie: Mr. Attorney if you will draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the denial of the conditional use permit. Gigray: Yes, Mr. Mayor and as I understand we do this, we submit it at the very next meeting for your consideration. 20. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INCLUDES SIGNAGE FOR CHEVRON C-STORE WITH GAS PUMPS & DETACHED CAR WASH, MCDONALD'S WITH DRIVE-UP WINDOW (SAME BUILDING AS C- STORE) & IDAHO UNITED CREDIT UNION BY EAGLE PARTNERS-NW CORNER EAGLE ROAD & MAGIC VIEW DR: (ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS) Corrie: At this time I will open the public hearing on item number- r' \ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 54 Bird: Mr. Mayor I am going to excuse myself as I did in the last one for the same reason. Corrie: Okay, I'll open the public hearing then with the one excused Council member, Mr. Bird. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, and as.this issue has come up before and I would also declare and submit to the Council and let them decide if there's a possible conflict. My wife does work for this particular sign company. She is not the sales agent, and I would not benefit from this in any way. But I will let the Council decide whether that's a conflict or not. Rountree: I state the same thing as I stated previously that I don't believe that I have an issue with that. Bentley: Ditto. Corrie: Mr. Bentley. Bentley: I feel the same way no issue. Corrie: All right, I'll open the public hearing and invite staff comments first. Hawkins-Clark: Mayor and members of the Council, my understanding of this is that there's a history you as the Council requested that this item be tabled at your July 20 meeting, I'm sorry not tabled but continued. There was an appeal of the Planning and Zoning Commission decision. Again this application is a result of what staff viewed as a significant modification to the original conditional use permit. Due to the three separate signs that were submitted as a part and again this is three signs. You have the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations before you. If you would like, I believe you've seen them before, we do have overheads that show the 100 foot pylon sign as well as the 35 foot sign along Eagle. Staff recommendations dated June 14, 1999 which do recommend denial of the 100 foot continue to stand, no changes from staff in that manner. Corrie: Thank you. This is a public hearing. We would like to hear from the applicant or their representative tonight. Butler: Good evening Mayor and Council members, JoAnn Butler, 607 N. 8th Street representing the applicant Eagle Partners. I have copies of my notes that I'm going to pass out for the Council just so they them to follow along and I won't read them verbatim. In this application that has been now before the Council several times in connection with the conditional use and once as you deferred this until tonight on the sign, you've asked us to address the conditional use elements of your zoning ordinance in connection with these signs and we're happy to do this because I think with a review of the facts and the circumstances of this particular sign proposal with the testimony that the Planning and Zoning Commission heard and that you'll hear tonight and with the staff work that has been done, we'll show how these sign proposals do meet with your conditional use modification standards, so we are asking the City tonight to do a couple MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 55 of things. Adopt the recommendation of the P & Z Commission to approve the Idaho Credit sign, adopt the recommendation of the P & Z Commission to approve the Chevron, McDonald sign on Eagle Road with the understanding that the Chevron sign will not be turned off during the late night hours, but the McDonald's sign will between the hours of 12:00 and 6:00 a.m. We think there was looking at the testimony although I wasn't at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. My partner was and I did read the minutes and I think there was some confusion at the end of the hearing in which there was a lot of discussion about turning off the pylon sign during certain hours, and I think that got confused with what was happening on the Eagle Road side at a press when one of the commissioners was leaving and trying to get a vote done, but we'll address that in a little bit more detail in a minute so basically adopt the findings of the P & Z with regard to the Chevron, McDonald sign on Eagle Road, but the McDonald sign would be turned off during the late night hours between 12:00 and 6:00, asking you to reject the recommendation of the P & Z Commission with regard to the sign that is in close proximity to 1-84. But adopt a condition of approval that was discussed that night but not made part of the recommendation to have the sign that is in close proximity to 1- 84 to be turned off between the hours of 11 :00 p.m. and 4:00 a.m. With me tonight is Craig Jameson from the sign company that will address the Council, George Kyler from McDonald's and Steve Eddy. Mr. Eddy will address the Council. He may reserve his time for rebuttal along with myself unless you have some specific questions for him. So just briefly running through the conditional use criteria of your ordinance. You asked us to find out whether or not this conditional use is determined to be appropriate under city policy. Meridian has annexed and zoned this property as C-G or general retail and service commercial and the project is designated in a community activity area. The purpose of that C-G zone is and I'm going to quote from your ordinance to provide for a commercial uses, which are auto and service oriented and are located in close proximity to major highway or arterial streets, and you are to fulfill the needs of the travel related services as well as retail sales for the transient and the permanent motoring public. The whole goal and purpose of your ordinance is to serve the motoring public in this particular zone. Services in close proximity, not necessarily directly adjacent to the freeway, but in close proximity to major highways and arterials which we are on the intersection of Eagle Road and 1-84. My understanding is that is the most heavily trafficked intersection in the State of Idaho. So we are attempting with this sign application to identify the business that serves the motoring public that you the City are trying to get served and do so in a manner that ensures the conditional use goals of your ordinances and your plan. Your ordinance requires us to be in harmony and in accordance with your Comprehensive Plan. The general retail and service commercial zone and the specific conditional use request is consistent with your goals and policies. Those that have stated their opposition to the project have never been able to point out to the Councilor to the Commission in what way we don't meet your goals and ordinances in your policy and Comprehensive Plan. As one of the Planning and Zoning Commissioners stated it was always assumed that a freeway oriented sign would be part of this freeway oriented project, and the City understands and requires that ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 56 commercial development to serve the traveling public needs to provide attractive, well signed gateway to Meridian. As Mr. Kyler likes to say that he's told me that a business without a sign is a sign of no business, and I think that's what we would have here without proper identification. This mixed use area in the vicinity of Eagle and 1-84 interchange is a priority development for Meridian under your ordinance and your plan. The location of this project and I quote from your commercial policy encourages commercial uses to locate high intensity activity areas such as freeway interchanges. Your Comprehensive Plan also says that Eagle Road is designated as an entryway corridor in the City of Meridian. You talk about the fact that entryway corridors are a community's front door and it's acknowledged that the corridors, trees, commercial signage and site character often provide the first and the lasting impression for Meridian. The conditional use process states the Comprehensive Plan states that the conditional use process afford the City the opportunity to address special features of each property and their facilities including this one and that's why we're here before you tonight. We understand that this is the most heavily trafficked intersection that it is an area that you want to make sure is heavily landscaped, signed well and creates a good image for the City and as well does not intrude on the neighboring properties. This is a well designed and well construction project. You've been through this as well as the Planning and Zoning Commission for many years setting many conditions of approval to make sure that this project is well designed and well identified. There are over 33 trees on Eagle Road alone of three inch caliper that you required. I think over 68 or 70 trees on this project as a whole. There's a very distinct difference between the design of this project and the project located immediately south of this. There was an awful lot of testimony at the Planning and Zoning Commission from neighbors and you're likely to hear that again tonight. Neighbors that are nervous and scared that what we are proposing for this project somehow will be like the Texaco sign and the reader board that's directly south of this. People talked to the Commission and talked about the flashing light that is in their backyards from that existing sign. It's a travesty as far as we're concerned, and we're sorry that we in essence bear the brunt of having to come before you when people are worried that this will be like that. This project will be designed like that, and nothing could be further from the truth and I ask you to give due weight to the professional testimony that's going to be provided to you by Mr. Jameson and others tonight. We will explain the illumination of the signs. We have again offered to completely turn off the freeway oriented sign between 11 :00 and 4:00. There would be no blinking bald lights in the vicinity of the neighborhood. (End of Tape) Butler: ... wealth of information not necessarily on this issue to the Council and we thank you and we know it's late. It was a long hearing at the Planning and Zoning Commission and I hope you've had a chance to read the transcript. But we're here tonight to answer questions, to discuss with you possible conditions of approval to ensure that the design of this site is compatible as we believe it is and we'll do a great deal for Meridian at this entrance way, and with that I'm going to turn the podium over Mr. Jameson, reserve some time for rebuttal unless there are some questions by the Council. ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 57 Bentley: JoAnn you said that there's no blinking bulb lights on this sign. Are you leaving open that there's blinking bulb lights somewhere else? Butler: There are presently found on the Texaco reader board, and that's what I was referring to. Bentley: On your project. Butler: No, no, not at all. Bentley: Thank you. Butler: Thank you. Jameson: Good evening Mayor and members of the Council, my name is Craig Jameson, I'm with Idaho Electric Signs 6528 Supply Way. I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you tonight. It's been suggested that maybe I might give you a little bit of my background within the industry and my qualifications. I've been with Idaho Electric Signs for approximately seven years serving as a sales manager for that company. One of my major responsibilities is dealing with sign ordinances not only within the southern Idaho area, but in fact I deal with cities all across the west in Washington, Oregon, Utah, Colorado, Missoula, a number of different cities, so I've had quite a bit of experience in that particular area. When Boise went through their most recent revision to their sign ordinance, I represented the sign industry on that committee that developed a new ordinance. I certainly applaud the fact that I understand that you folks have developed a committee now that you're putting together to address putting together an ordinance for the City of Meridian. Additionally I'm under contract a separate contract with Home Depot to represent them at various different cities in Colorado, Utah, Idaho and also in Montana, so I'd hope that my experience might carry a little weight with the Council. Certainly I am here to provide you with whatever information that I can and to answer to any questions that I can for you and as JoAnn had mentioned there's certainly a lot of questions involving signs in this particular issue. I'm here to basically address the issues that we'd like to discuss in terms of the signage itself in terms of how we chose a particular place to place the signs. I know there's questions regarding lighting and a lot of concerns, and I would like to explain to you perhaps how the signage that we're proposing is much different from the other sign as JoAnn had mentioned that was originally to the south of us and just discuss some other issues here. I have prepared a little packet here for each of you if I could bring that up and we can kind of refer to that as we go along if that would be okay. Basically gentlemen on the front pages there are the two signs that are in question. I might take this opportunity to perhaps make some differentiation between our calculations in terms of the square footage involved in this signage and what staff's calculations might be. Typically we find that when dealing with cities they calculate the square footage of the sign face themselves so the signage that we're proposing for the interstate oriented sign and that's to address the interstate traffic is 470 square foot, and the smaller sign to be on Eagle Road we're showing is 334 square foot. I do understand that on Fairview you have adopted a policy for a monument type sign where you've got basically a base ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 58 width that would be equal to the sign face itself. That's why I believe staff came up with a 670 square foot for the sign that's shown on Eagle Road. However I think it's important to distinguish between mass and sign area and I think in a lot of cases especially when there's certain concerns that are involved in the overall impact of a sign on a community. I think when you're dealing with a pole structure like this, certainly we're not dealing with that kind of mass so I think it's two different types of issues here. One of the first things I would like to address if I can step over here to the stand, I'm not sure is this microphone working? This would basically be a site plan showing the location of the large pylon sign. Are you able to see that from where you're sitting? I'm kind of used to north going this way, but this would be the southwest corner of the property. What we've done here is we've tried to place the sign actually as far away as possible from the neighborhood, which is oriented up this section here. We're actually from this point up to the end of the property line we're close to two football fields away, so we've done everything we can to place the sign as far as possible. In actuality I understand there's going to be a buffer zone between where the property line ends and where the residential area actually starts, so in actuality we're talking about more than six hundred foot from the sign placement to the residential area. I think another critical issue that we want to talk about here is the orientation of the sign. Once again this sign is oriented not to address traffic that's going north / south on Eagle Road, but it's oriented to address traffic going east and west on 1-84 and because of that, the sign lighting is also headed in that direction. The sign lights out along the east and it also lights out on the west. What the neighbors are actually seeing from the sign is the side of the sign, which is actually a metal case. There's no illumination. In other words we're not getting a 360 degree illumination from the sign itself. So this sign right here once again is directed for 1-84 traffic and frankly that's the type of traffic that we're trying to capture with this sign. Despite the fact that we may not have actual interstate frontage, I want to make sure that it's clear that this is an interstate oriented business or businesses. I mean part of large a very large part of the business that we want to capture with this sign are people who are traveling through the Treasure Valley area and they're looking for gas or they're looking for something to eat or whatever, and certainly there's a lot of traffic that's going by there and that's what this sign is directed to do. As a matter of fact I think it was Commissioner Borup that mentioned in the Planning and Zoning meeting that when he drives along 1st where you've got a McDonald's sign there, it's the same height that we're talking about here. It's the same sign and it's at 100 foot. The only difference would be that the Chevron is not featured on that sign. He doesn't necessarily see it when he's traveling up and down the streets of Meridian. He sees it when he's along 1-84. That is what this sign is designed to do. The smaller sign located on Eagle Road would be located at this intersection here. In terms of the height, I want you to know that we just didn't pick this out haphazardly and decide that we want to place a 100 foot sign because that's like a standard sign package that we put together. We actually took a boom truck out off to the site and we positioned it at several different places on the site, at several different heights with a target and our people drove the interstate. I myself was not there, although the ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 59 McDonald's representative was to look for the optimum visibility where we could have this sign because it's not really a very easy site to see here. I also have here an aerial of the site and within your package, you've got photographs that were taken from this area over here headed west along the interstate and then also from this area over here headed east along the interstate. Going east along the interstate presents its own problems~ We got a lot of trees that are over in this area and then actually the off ramp is quite a ways back there. So in order to able to get people safely along the interstate to the off ramp so they can come down and come up to the Chevron and McDonalds, that sign height was necessary. You can see there's actually quite a distance for traveling here. The other sign photographs that I took were from this area here and once again over here and you can actually see the line of sight here. We do have I believe this is an older aerial, but the St. AI's building was also a concern in that particular nature, but our goal with a sign of this nature is not only to capture that traffic that's going there and let them know that people are - that the Chevron and the McDonald5 are there to service their needs but then also we need to let them know far enough ahead of time so that they can get to the off ramp in a safe manner. So that's basically how we chose the position and the orientation and the height of the sign. Please if you have any questions, as I'm going along, please feel free to ask me. There has been some concern about the lighting. Frankly at the Planning and Zoning meeting we spent a great deal of time in discussing that and I had the feeling overall that the Planning and Zoning Commission was fairly well satisfied that this isn't the same type of sign that you're going to see to the south. First of all, we're not featuring the flashing light message center. Now the bulbs in that sign are my guess like 50 watt bulbs that turn off and turn on based on the computer directions for it and clear bulbs and probably maybe with a reflector behind them and certainly they do project a lot of light. We're dealing with signs that are first of all with colored faces and I do have some statistics for you which I'd be glad to pass up and it gets a little bit complicated when we deal with colored Plexiglas the amount of light that actually passes through the sign is reduced. It makes sense. If you've got a clear piece of plastic or glass more light is going to pass through that than if you have a color that's based on over it. So for example if I have something clear then basically you know close to 1000/0 of that light is going to pass through. On the other hand if I have even a white face, actually only approximately 370/0 of the overall light actually passes through that particular sign. Red ranges anywhere from 30/0 to 120/0 is passed through depending on the color of the red. Naturally the darker color would allow less light to pass through than the lighter color would. Yellow which is another color that used will actually pass anywhere from 19 to 360/0 and the other color that we finally use is blue and that passes anywhere from 1 % to 190/0 depending on the color, so the colors are certainly muted down a tremendous amount from what you would see with the message center that's on that other sign and frankly I think that any kind of light that's really upsetting the neighbors is coming from that. There's a difference actually being able to see the sign and actually the light passing through. So that certainly would shed a lot of light. We've done our best, you know we had discussed that that might be a possibility but have decided not to do that basically _c - MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 60 for that reason. I guess what I'm trying to get down here is a combination of the light being muted and the distance that we're talking about once again over 600 foot plus the orientation of the sign. We don't expect the light to be a problem. I know in Boise, a sign needs to be 300 foot from a residential area is considered to be the standard for a lighted sign. There was talk about how can you measure the actual light? People talk about things like foot candles, very complicated formula, but the problem is it's actually designed for directional and flood lighting, direct lighting and it's not really applicable within the sign industry. I should say it's nearly impossible to calculate. What we'd have to do is we'd have to have the sign sitting there in a controlled area and take the foot candles on the white section on the blue section on the red section on the yellow section and calculate it from there, and it's still something that once again is based on direct lighting rather than the type of lighting we're talking about. I do have pictures of other signs in the area. Some of them do have interstate frontage. Those you have in front of you there. Some do not. The signs like the existing McDonald sign does not have interstate frontage. In fact the Texaco sign that we're talking about does not have an interstate frontage. There's a hotel that's going to be built in front of that. There's a few other signs that are in the same basic area"there. My understanding in speaking with staff is that the basically if this particular project had direct interstate frontage, this sign would not be a problem. But in fact we're 50 close to the interstate, we are an interstate oriented business. It's absolutely necessary and it's been discussed from day one that we require this type of sign as I can tell you that I personally made a presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission I think it was over two years ago in regard to the fact that we needed an interstate sign on this project. At the time the project had not been approved and we weren't allowed to present that sign for formal approval, but it's been very clear from the start. There seems to be a feeling that we'd always discussed low slung monument type signage. I think staff even mentioned that signage like Hubble Engineering is asking for. First of all that never occurred and second of all we're talking about two different types of businesses. It is very rare that I drive through a strange city and want to pull over and grab a blueprint for lunch. I mean it's not that type of a business. This is certainly an interstate oriented business. I might also mention that there's talk of we can get signage along the interstate in terms of an interstate services sign that's provided by the transportation department and that's fine and they serve a purpose. The problem being that first of all they're very, very low in height and if people are going along and they're in a strange city and they're looking for that type of service and there's a semi truck or even a Bronco next to them, they are probably not going to see them and being able to make a quick exit to the off ramp. The other problem is that you know quite often the reason I don't use them is that they don't tell you where that service might be. You know I myself have gotten off in Yakima looking for a McDonalds and I never did find it. I think I'm the type of person I think a lot of people are the type of people that are looking for one a brand or a particular service that they're familiar with and if you're me and I'm not sure where I am in this particular city, I'm looking for easy on/off. That's what it is all about and I think even the highway department understands the importance of having signs at a certain height because if ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 61 you look at exit coming up for Meridian Road or Eagle or whatever, you find that most often those are placed at a height above the traffic. They're either placed on an overpass or they're placed in some other manner at a higher level so that people could see them from a distance and have plenty of time to do that. Even as far as the interstate services signs go, quite often they say interstate business and once again that's the type of business we are. I guess I would just like to basically conclude by a couple of quick comments. I know there's always a concern when a city grants signage that may not be the normal signage that they're used to seeing that all of a sudden everybody is going to want one. I can tell you that this type of signage is very much self policing. First of all everybody doesn't want one. Hubble Engineering doesn't want one. The Idaho Power Credit Union doesn't want one. It's not that type of business. If they don't want them, they don't need them. Quite frankly a lot of businesses can't afford them. I mean you're talking this sign itself would probably be close to $100,000 by the time it's installed and not everybody without the need or want is going to be able to justify that type of signage so I really feel that's a concern that really is unfounded. Then finally please keep in mind that we're not dealing with a lot of mass here. We're dealing with a sign that is substantially smaller than its neighbor sign. If we want to talk about mass for that matter we can look at St. AI's and we could look at the light across on the building. That sign is probably - excuse me St. Luke's, that sign is probably a 50-60 foot up there. So in terms of the height and we've got the mass of the building but of course it's a hospital. So with that if there are any questions, I'd certainly be more than happy to answer them. Bentley: Mr. Mayor, I got a question on your other sign that's in here. The one that's on Eagle Road. Why couldn't you use a monument sign for that? Jameson: I'm not the person to make the decision on the monument sign or not, I'd rather have Mr. Eddy and Mr. Kyler address that. I think when we discussed that in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission, what was pointed out was the fact that we do have very extensive landscaping, a number of trees and tree obscure a sign and so we were making an attempt to raise the sign above the trees. In order to make it effective as a monument sign, the trees would have to be thinned out in that particular area. Bentley: Okay thank you. Corrie: Anyone else from the public who wants to issue testimony at this point? I would suggest that you keep your comments to five minutes and no more. The hour is getting late and it isn't helping the cause any if you keep going and going and going. Anybody else from the public? Mr. Williams. Williams: My name is Richard Williams, I live at 3133 Autumn Way, Meridian. Just a couple of things. This 100 foot pylon sign goes, now we have the entrances to Meridian off the freeway both exits, now a goal post of two McDonalds signs. I think Ms. Butler went through a gyration to say they're in compliance and this whole project is in compliance. It mayor may not be. We'll find that out later. But they're just ugly. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 62 They're just flat ugly. When you look at what you want to have an entrance to the City of Meridian it has to be somewhat reasonable, it has to be attractive and it has to make people want to stop there. If you go east on 1-84 through Meridian, there are three McDonalds along the interstate. Not one of them has a sign like this. The one on Overland Road doesn't, the one at Vista doesn't, the one at the outlet mall doesn't. If you go into Eagle, you drive up Eagle Road, do you know where the McDonalds is there? Albertson's? They have a very low monument sign. Now the monument sign they're proposing is three and a half times taller than a basket ball hoop. That's not a monument, that's a tree. I just ask that this Council use some common sense and address how you want the entrance to the City of Meridian to look. And I don't think this is the way you really want it to look. P & Z denied this pylon sign for a reason. I would ask that you support your Planning and Zoning Commission. They done a lot of work on it. They've looked at things and they made a good recommendation. Thank you. Corrie: Any questions? Anyone else who would like to issue testimony at this time? Harrel: My name is Chuck Harrel. I live at 3043 Autumn Way in Meridian. Good evening gentlemen. I'm going to try not to use up more than my five minutes here. I guess I've got a question for everybody here. I would like to know why we're here tonight. Planning and Zoning denied this and yet it came before you all and now we're back here discussing the same thing that they had over 40 pages of documentation of why they denied this. It puzzles me, it really does. I don't know how this bureaucracy works. We are a government for the people, not for business. Rountree: That's why we're here. Harrel: For the people. Rountree: Correct. Horrel: That's right. Rountree: That's why this hearing is being held. Horrel: That's right. But it seems that out of consideration to the business that this is why we're here tonight not for the consideration of the people. If they are denied, they have the opportunity to reapply and reapply and reapply. Once they are okayed we the people have no recourse. We cannot come back and reapply, and say wait a minute, time out. They won, but we don't agree with that. Agree? Oh, we can come back and with another application for denial? Rountree: This is taking away from your testimony time. If you want to debate that Issue, we can. Harrel: Okay. I guess what I would like to know, is there any residential property in Meridian bounded by 100 foot signs? I think the answer to that is no. Ms. Butler said the ordinances in the Comprehensive Plan is to protect, but it's to protect the residents and everything has to be done in a balance, in a harmony. We keep on going to the Texaco sign which to me is a moot point. Because that has nothing to do with this ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 63 project. We're here to dispute the fact that the application for 100 foot sign that falls within the immediate impact area of our residences, and that's what we're doing. We're not here to dispute the fact that the Texaco station has a sign that's objective. Some statements about signage for Home Depot and again what relevance does this all have to do with McDonalds and Chevron and this project. Alii can say is gentlemen I love living here in Meridian. We've got a great city. I've said this before. Part of the motto of the city is it's a great place to live and I think we should keep it that way and really feel that these types of signs are very inappropriate. Thank you. Corrie: Thank you. Anyone else would like to testify? Brown: Kent Brown, 3161 Springwood. Listening to the testimony of the experts, I was curious about the sign. When I look at the site, it seems like St. Luke's is in the site path of where that sign is going to be showing to the east. If the site distance is coming at the location that they're talking about, that's right at the off ramp for the westbound traffic. Do they have enough time for them to react and for them to be able to do that? This is a comment that we brought up at Planning and Zoning. Is the overpass for Cloverdale obstructing that site that when the westbound - can they really see that sign? We're arguing over this sign because it's obtrusive to us as residents, but it's obtrusive. Is really going to work?' Is it going to do the purpose and obviously the experts have convinced McDonalds and Chevron that it is. But when I look at the site and their own graphics and where those site distances are, even for the eastbound traffic where the site distance is, is right there where the off ramp is. Traveling at 65 miles an hour, what's the reaction time for them to be able to pull off. With the other developments that are going on in this corridor, this potentially in the Comp Plan with the other businesses, the Holiday Express that's suppose to go in, is this sign going to be able to be seen over the top of those new structures and the new proposed buildings that would be in the industrial area or are we the only ones that are going to see it? That's some of the concerns that I had as I look at this sign. My testimony in the Planning and Zoning hearing also spoke to Chevron there on Milwaukee when we talked about monuments signs, Billy Ray Strite had on his drawing he showed a monument sign. We talked about is this really a sign that you're going to want to have and then today we have a lot larger sign and a lot taller sign. Yet the Chevron I believe at Milwaukee and - I'm trying to think of what that intersection is, Emerald. To me it seems like that sign is a lower sign. It's closer to the ground. People are traveling in congested traffic there and they have the ability to get off. Eagle Road has that same ability with the lights and so forth that are there, and I don't believe that that sign is also needed. Are there any questions? Corrie: Thank you Kent. Anyone else issue testimony? Kyler: Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Councilmen. My name is George Kyler, I work for McDonalds restaurants in Lake Oswego, Oregon. A couple of things. I was in the car driving around when we were looking for the best place to put a high rise sign that would be visible from the interstate. In reality if you go to the northern most point of the MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 64 Eagle Partners' property, which is closest to the neighborhoods, then the vantage point was seen north of the hospital and was a little more visible and we were compromising by putting it further to the south. In our opinion is adequate reaction time to get oft the interstate. I don't think it was something that the sign company sold us, because they want to make money or anything like that. We were actually in the car and viewed the entire site from both east and west. This is pretty typical to the signage that we have throughout the interstate system. Whether you're in Mountain Home, which is about 100 foot sign with K Mart on a combined sign like this. Or you're in Jerome or Ontario, we have residential I believe to the west of us here on 1 st Street in Meridian. I don't recall ever having any complaints from anybody about the visibility of that sign or disturbing them. When you're on an interstate highway, the need for a high rise sign and the draw from the highway is substantial and can't be really related to something like the outlet mall which not even a full menu and has hours of operation where they are only open when the businesses are open. You can't compare it to a store on Broadway or something else that's not geared to the interstate, so I just wanted to clarify the difference in some of these issues, so I would be glad to answer any questions you might have, but I just wanted to bring up a couple of the points. Rountree: Any questions? Anyone else wish to testify? Eddy: My name is Steve Eddy. I'm the Chevron proprietor for this location. I would just like to clarify a couple of things and then get to Mr. Bentley's comment on the monument sign. We just really feel that signage on Eagle Road is needed at that height for the landscaping to see. I think all you people have been in the vicinity of the airport station and we're basically proposing the same type of signage as airport, which the Chevron / McDonalds sign the high rise is a lot larger airport than this one. Both signs in case but the street sign is basically the same one. The other thing is the only sign I've ever talked about in front of this Councilor the P & Z is a sign comparable to the station on E. 1st in Meridian or the Locust Grove Chevron, which this sign on Eagle Road is exactly the same sign. There's no difference. One other point of clarification is these signs we buy. I buy from Chevron supplier. McDonalds buys from their supplier. Idaho Electric does not benefit other than just the installation of these signs, so we've done the studies in seeing that these signs are important for our business and our type of use to survive. The freeway signs, you know, they help, but they help guide the people off the interstate and then the people look because they're not familiar with the area for the high rise sign of how close it is to the interstate. We think it's a key to have both for our business to be successful. One thing I really feel strongly. I went and looked at all the high rise signs in the area. I don't think this sign will intrude in the neighbors' backyards in any way the way it's placed. We agreed fully that this sign would be shut off at 11 :00 p.m. back on 4 to 5:00 a.m. We could live with 5:00 a.m. We agreed, we don't want those type of people in the area at that time of night. That's who we would be catering to. But when our business is busy, it's between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. and we need that freeway exposure for those people to come trade with us. Another thing is this project started so long ago, we have always thought we would get ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 65 a high rise sign approved at this facility with the other high rises in the area. I know this thing started three years ago. We tried to submit signs at one time. I krJow it's been said a couple of times, but we've always felt that this is very critical for us at that facility and that's alii really have unless any of you have any questions. Corrie: Thank you. Anybody else would like to testify? Bowen: My name is Ann Bowen and I live at 3067 Autumn Way. I have a couple thoughts. First of alii think the human race is much smarter than this sign man is giving us credit for. I can drive down the freeway and see a sign that's big that says these services are available at the next exit. My three year old can point that out and tell us which way to go. I don't think they need to be 100 feet high in order for people to see those and understand them. We took a trip down to Utah last weekend and all the signs are about this big off to the side and it was very easy and it doesn't block the beauty of the landscape. The other thing is there was a little comment in the Statesman last week that somebody wrote about the RC Willey sign and it started out bigger is not always better, and I won't read it all but the end is signs are meant to identify a business, not to be used for advertisement. Identifying a business isn't 100 feet up in the air. It's an advertisement and the other thing that I'm concerned about is I would like to be proud to live in Meridian and if we have signs all over Eagle Road, it's not going to be a pretty entrance to our city. And I would hope that you care about that too and we can make it look like a nice place. Corrie: Thank you. Brown: My name is Debbie Brown. I live at 3161 Springwood. I appreciate the hour is late. I appreciate you being here Mayor and Council members. I hope to make this short. For your information, I have been appointed to be on the new committee that is coming up with a sign proposals and the new sign ordinances and in the few meetings that we have had we had to discuss signs such as this sign. The consensus has been this is something that we don't want to have. This is something that we want to try to avoid and more than once the idea of a quote monument sign has come up, and we're going to come up with some guidelines and some specifications as to what a monument sign is. The guidelines as to the height, the width and such and so we have used this sign as something that we in general were all discouraged about having because it produces a negative effect as someone enters the citYJ and I agree with Ann Bowen that just spoke that we can have smaller signs as guidance signs along the freeway where they can see one sign saying "x" businesses coming up, a sign a little bit further down the road that would say turn off at this exit. That would be something under another jurisdiction other than Meridian City, but it's something that we could propose and look into. This business has been considered as an interstate business. In my opinion it is not an interstate business. This is a business that is directly affecting my neighborhood and the area that my children are being raised in and they said that this sign thafs going to be proposed has a metal barricade that goes around which would be the area that faces my bedroom window. I'm currently affected by the same type of metal case that ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 66 goes around. If I choose to sleep with my blinds open, I cannot sleep with the light that reflects around that metal barricade and comes into my window, so it is personally affecting me. If you notice where they have the sign placed, they're only discussing the homes that are directly to the side of this sign. If you go down further into our neighborhood, you can see the frontage of that sign not just the side components so that's something that we would be affected by. The time slot they have deemed it would be turned off and turned on, I sleep later than 4:00 a.m. That's my goal at least. If the sign comes on at 4:00 a.m. I think that that's not the type of alarm clock that I want to have. Another point that I want to point out is they've pointed out here where the line is showing where the view of the light is shown on to the freeway. St. Luke's is only in a beginning portion of its phases. There are yet many phases to be developed and I believe that some of those phases could intrude on their projected sign. In other words, it wont' be able to show on to the freeway like they're proposing so I don't see that the need that they have to have it that tall will be defeated once that hospital is completed. That's alii have to say. Any questions? Thank you gentlemen. Corrie: Any questions? Anyone else to testify? Hearing none, one of you can rebuttal and that's - Butler: Thank you Mr. Mayor, Council members. I hope I'm not too disjointed, but just try to answer some of the questions that have been raised. A good question raised by a gentleman in the audience is why are we here tonight? We are governed by the ordinances and in fact on the date of our application your sign ordinance would not prohibit this signs that we proposed so like the gentleman in the audience, quite frankly we raise the questions of whether we legally even need to be before the city, but we area trying to work with the city to work within your conditional use requirements and looking for reasonable regulations imposed on the sign to ensure compatibility. Signs are commercial speech. Our constitution protects it. It allow municipalities to impose reasonable regulations. Signs are not only for identification of business, they are for speech and that does include advertisement. This is a conditional use that's before you and we are granting that will allow the city to look at reasonable regulations. Although we question that under the sign ordinance, but under a conditional use this is not a prohibited use. It's a use that the city has acknowledged it's permitted, but could affect nearby properties and so you reserve the right to hold public hearings like tonight for the benefit of the people, both the businesses and the neighbors to try to impose reasonable regulations to ensure compatibility. This sign is over 600 feet away from the existing residential area. So we're asking you tonight to weigh the testimony and give due weight to the professionals that have given you that testimony. It's due the weight that our courts have said it is due. We are asking you to incorporate into the record all of your sign approvals in your files in Meridian in close proximity to the major highways and in close proximity to major arterials and major highways and arterial streets. If you do deny the application in whole or in part, we are asking you to tell us what we need to gain approval and to tell us in detail why the application would be in any way denied. With that I just want to repeat what the Planning and Zoning Commission and if you look ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 171 1999 PAGE 67 at the testimony of the Planning and Zoning Commission, they gave no reason for denial. A couple of the commissioners, especially Ms. De Weerd, who is in the audience tonight talked about the fact that she wanted more information about illumination and reflection and I think the sign people have responded to that tonight and also responded by this owner going through great detail to show you how they tried to locate this to be as unobtrusive as possible and still maintain the business identification and advertising that it requires for any business of this sort and offering conditions of approval that this Council could apply. To be off the McDonalds on Eagle Road between 12:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. and for the pylon sign to be off between 11 :00 and 4:00 and as you heard Mr. Eddy has said that a 5:00 timeframe would be all right. Incorporating the Planning and Zoning Commission's testimony, you have heard that there are a number of signs in the general vicinity along the freeway or in close proximity that are perhaps 80 feet, 77 feet, 85 feet, 60 feet. My client has said that because the Texaco sign is at 77 feet that they would offer as a condition of approval to be at that height. At that point I think that the conditions of approval that we are that the P & Z Commission would have imposed and that the Council would have imposed would be reasonable regulations that this applicant can live with and we hope that our neighbors can too, and I hope that our neighbors have seen our willingness to be here for many years trying to work this through with them. So with that I'll stand for any questions. Mr. Mayor I also wanted to say that I'm assuming that you will be redrafting the findings and conclusions based on the testimony here tonight and your deliberations rather than go back and review the findings that were provided to you by the P & z. There were a few minor issues in there that we would take issue with, but I think that's probably by the wayside because you'll probably be redoing this and I just want to clarify to see if that's correct. Corrie: Thank you. Any questions? Butler: And is that correct? Okay. You will be redrafting your findings? Corrie: I'm sure we probably will unless we adopt what's already there. Council any other questions of staff or people? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing on item number 20. Bentley: So moved. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second to close the public hearing on item 20. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Staff any comments? Hearing none, I will entertain a motion for the request for conditional use permit on signage. Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, just a point of procedure here and information. How you deliberate on this and what your ultimate motion would be, I 1,\ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 68 would recommend that we would do new findings on this and proposed order depending on what your decision is and that proposed order would address the two questions. One would be the appeal that has been (End of Tape) Gigray: ... from the applicant as well as whether or not you would affirm or otherwise change any of the decisions and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission which are before you. The appeal is limited to the issue of the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial of the request for modification of conditional use permit for the 100 foot sign and the Planning and Zoning Commission then granted the application for modification of conditional use permit for the other two proposed signs, the monument sign and I believe the other sign that is along Eagle Road submit to some conditions that were stated in that action, but I think we could in one document one set of findings and one order address all of those questions, but we would separately address them in a proposed order back to you so that it's clear that you have a ruling with regards to each of these pending matters. Corrie: Okay. Take it whichever way you want to go. The appeal and then the changes of the conditions of Planning and Zoning, so how do you want to state it? Rountree: I'm not sure I'm awake enough to do it, but Mr. Mayor, I move that we have the City Attorney prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order as it relates to the conditional use permit for signage of Eagle Partners, that the findings and order reflect and include the recommendation from Planning and Zoning and that the findings and conditions further include denial of the appeal. Corrie: Do I have a second to that motion? Anderson: I second it. Corrie: Motion is made and second to have the attorney draw up the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order denying the appeal and to use the conditions of the Planning and Zoning Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as well. Is that correct? Rountree: Close enough. Corrie: Any discussion? Gigray: Just for purposes of information and record we prepare those findings for the next meeting and they're in your packet prior to the meeting so you can review those as you see them and you can make changes and you know it's not until you adopt them that they become final. So that gives you another shot at it. Corrie: We have a motion on the floor. All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: 3 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN. Butler: Mr. Mayor may I ask for a clarification. Our understanding at the Planning and Zoning Commission was is that there is no appeal. That we were told by staff that we were to file an appeal although your ordinance would have it be a recommendation only to this Council and that as you know that on your agenda tonight the appeal is not listed, MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 171 1999 PAGE 69 and I believe the Planning and Zoning Commission with our acquiescence we withdrew that appeal with the understanding that we would be taking before you only the recommendations of the P & Z. Corrie: Now we're getting into - Gigray: I'm not sure I understood what that was. Corrie: I don't think I did either. One more time JoAnn. Butler: Okay, Planning and Zoning Commission had an application before it for three signs. The Planning and Zoning Commission made a recommendation of two approvals and one denial. Staff members told our client that they were to file an appeal on the recommendation. Of course it wasn't a final decision from which to appeal because only a recommendation was coming up to this Council. So I think there was a miscommunication between staff members and us and that in effect there should not have been an appeal filed because there was no final decision. And maybe you would like to - Corrie: We can consider it, but I still think that the motion also included that recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission be followed by the Council as well. Butler: It's just a clarification. Corrie: Okay, thank you. Butler: There is no appeal. 21. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO REDUCE SETBACK BY GENE KLEFMAN AT LOT 10 BLOCK 3 OF LAKES AT CHERRY LANE NO.2: ATTORNEY TO PREPARE FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL) Corrie: I'll open the public hearing for this variance for the Lake at Cherry Lane No.2 and invite staff comments first. Do you have any comments on this one? Siddoway: Staff has no comments on this application. Gigray: Is there a record of this particular matter because there's going to need to be some kind of record before the Council of the application. That an application has been completed and I'm not sure - was that handed out? Corrie: Do we have an application? Gigray: I mean there has to be I would think some record that we've got something that's properly before you. Rountree: I have a hearing notice. Gigray: But I mean if I'm directed to make findings, I'm going to want to make sure there's a record that I can rely upon that - MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 70 Rountree: The application is in the file. Corrie: Okay, it just didn't get in our packets. All right. Since this is a public hearing, I will invite the owner I assume that's who you are. Klefman: This is new to me, so if you think you're confused. Mayor and City Councilmen, I'm Gene Klefman at 3725 N. Sea Cove Way which is the property in question. My wife and I knew I was going to retire so we entered into a contract with a builder a local builder in the fall of 1988 and they've got the house done in 1989. I was still employed and traveling and so I had to leave it in his hands and by the contract we had with him, he would get all the permits and variances because I was never home. So until this year when we decided to try to upgrade our home for two reasons. Number one, we've lived there for ten years and Sea Cove has been a dead end street and all of a sudden it's opened up and we got a lot of nice homes. We'd like to upgrade our home to bring property value a little bit more in line. Number two, we originally wanted that home to face toward Harbor Point. The contractor said oh yeah it will so we put out the money to Mr. Barney and bought the lot and then after he gets to laying it out, it won't fit so he had to turn it so it faced Sea Cove Way. Well the problem is and we didn't realize it at the time that put the back of our house facing the very southwest sunset and you can come to the back of my house any time around 4:00 on 7:00 it's 110 degrees out there and we just have no patio, no place to be cool. So we got a hold of a remodeler a local remodeler through my insurance company that recommended him and he come in with a design and that design said let's replace this existing porch and at the same time we can add a gable there and give you a covered patio and that will give you some more shade. So boy this sounds good so $20,000 contract later and he goes to work and he finds out that well the presumption is we already have a variance. The trouble is when you go and look, there isn't any variance. So your staffing folks worded it correctly. They said an existing encroachment. Weill didn't know that I was encroaching. I thought I had a variance. Now if you look at the handout I gave you, you can see that the property line is quite your regular. It's very difficult to put anything square on that piece of property. Nevertheless, what I've tried to do is not make a profit. I just tried to improve my home and gain a little bit of shade and we're elderly. I've been retired ten years, and we'd just like to have a place that we can enjoy and stay in Meridian, and so I'm at your mercy and I put it in your hands, gentlemen. If you have any questions. Corrie: Any questions? Is there anyone else who would like to issue testimony in this case? I guess there's just the two of you. Okay, do you have any other questions? Staff? If not I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Bird: So moved. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to close the public hearing on item number 21. All those in favor say aye. / MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 71 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: All right. I have a motion then for then for the variance request at Lakes at Cherry Lane No.2 by Gene and Rose Klefman. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I'll try to struggle through this. I move that we approve the variance for Gene and Rose Klefman at the Lakes at Cherry Lane NO.2 Subdivision to allow an encroaching kitchen addition to be installed in lieu of the encroaching original porch and reduce setback to 12 feet which is generally located on lot 10 block 3 of the Lakes at Cherry Lane NO.2 Subdivision. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order. Bentley: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and second that we approve the variance as requested. Is there any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bentley: No more additions on the back now. We're sorry to keep you here that late, but you'll get to sleep before we do. 22. WATER / SEWER / TRASH DELINQUENCIES: (DO NOT HAVE REPORTS) Corrie: We don't have at this time because of the computer program. We'll have it next time. Bentley: Good, I'll have mine paid by then. 23. DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 1. GARY SMITH: A. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR WELL NO. 18 PUMP AND PUMPHOUSE: (APPROVE) Smith: Thank you Mr. Mayor and Council members. The first item I have is change order number one for the well no. 18 pump and pump house project. This is a final adjustment to the bid quantities for the project. The majority of the costs as I've noted in my interoffice memo to you has to do with replacement of sod and sprinkler system that got kind of torn up with the drilling of the well. We had a problem with the weather conditions at the time that the well was drilled. And the fact that the park area or the lot that we were drilling the well on had been sodded by the homeowners association and a sprinkler system had been installed by them. So we replaced those two items. Such that the ground surface would be restored similar to what it was when we started. This will close out the contract with Iminger Construction for this project. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 72 Corrie: Council, any questions? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Okay, I'll entertain a motion on the request for change order number one at well no. 18 pump and pump house. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we approve change order number one for well and pump house at well number 18 in the amount of $6,012.19. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to approve the request for change order number one on well number 18 pump and pump house. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. B. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION - WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS: (APPROVE) Smith: The second item is a proposal for construction inspection at our Wastewater Treatment Plant. I've been concerned for some time now that we've been getting adequate inspection and we've been relying a lot on what time my staff was able to particularly, Brad Watson, was able to spend out there, which has been very limited and time that John Shawcroft and/or his assistant superintendent was able to spend looking after the construction. The consultant on the - all the consultants on the design projects have taken responsibility and we pay them for additional services to inspect the projects at specific times. Both Brad Watson and I felt that we needed better inspection because there is so much of the projects that are below ground after they're completed, so we had been in contact with one of the consultants that's working out there and they had in the past hired services of Ed Akenman to do contract inspection work for them. We contacted Mr. Akenman and he subsequently presented us with a proposal to do this inspection work on a contract basis and it's not a full time basis. It's as needed, but he would be available at the times that inspection is required. We have set up a or can set up a location for him at the plant where he can have a desk and file cabinet and I believe he has a cell phone that he would use and/or phones that we have at the plant that he could use. He comes with a lot of experience. We're very impressed with his background in the construction field and we think he'll do a great job for us. We've also talked to both design engineers for the two projects that we have in mind for him to watch over right now, and they don't have a problem with him doing that work as long was they are kept in the loop during the inspection times and advised of anything that is out of line with the contract documents and obviously he will need to keep them ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 73 involved if there are some problems that need to be resolved by the designers themselves. He's agreed to that also. So he's a very responsible individual and like I said he's got a lot of experience and so I would request we move ahead and retain him by contract or the two projects that are presently under construction out there. Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, I might also say I reviewed this contract and I would say of the ones I've seen that have been submitted, this is one of the best ones I've seen. We don't have the indemnity clauses where we indemnify them against their own (inaudible). We don't have the limits of liability. I am really concerned about the stuff that's getting thrown at us and this one I think is a very appropriate document for this kind of thing. Bird: I disagree. I think some of your insurance coverage is too cheap. $500,000 for automobile per occurrence should be $1,000,000. State and city requires any contract I have with you, you would make me have $1,000,000. Gigray: I'm just talking about the form. Bird: I think that it's a good consultant thing. Is this guy going to be doing - excuse me Mayor, can I ask a question? I'm sorry. Is he going to be doing the inspection for the owner? Smith: No, he's a contractor for us. Bird: That's what I mean for the owner which is us. Isn't that what we hire our architects and our engineers to do that we've already got contracts with? Smith: Well yes, sir. The contracts that we have with them on this particular type of work is a time and material basis so we pay them whatever time they're out there. The hiring of this person as a contractor will eliminate that cost that we would normally pay them. Bird: When they do their design, they do that on an hour? Smith: Not the design, the inspection. Bird: But part of the design and your contract is part of seeing that it's followed through. It's like an architect, it's like take the fire station. Mike and Paul are responsible until that thing is turned over for inspections and everything else. Smith: Right and we - Bird: I'm asking a question Gary. I'm not- MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 74 Smith: Right, we've worked that out with the design engineers and we've told them what we want to do that we want to hire this person as our contract inspector to inspect the work as it is constructed, and they don't have a problem with letting us do that. Bird: Well the $40 is very cheap for the expertise that he's got. Smith: Yeah, we thought it was a pretty good rate. Bird: It is. Other than his liability and stuff has to be $1 ,000,000 because I think if you will look, any contract, any specs in a public job requires $1 ,000,000 with a $2,000,000 overhead or some of them even go $4,000,000 limit. Smith: Most of the certificates of insurance that we get on a contract are for projects have those limits on them. Bird: Well you consultant has to have the same because he can cause a lawsuit the same as the general contractor could be identified in a lawsuit especially if he's doing the inspection for us and on that contract that would be the only thing I would see. The insurance requirements have to get up to state levels. Anderson: Gary, Keith just made me think. In the contract like we have in the fire station that construction management or overview was part of the original proposal so are we paying for that service twice? I mean we already paid for it with the design engineer or was that left out of that? Smith: No that portion what we paid the design engineer was for the preparation of the design was a lump sum amount. These other services are what they call additional services and they're on a time and material basis so they're just on as needed as the designer feels the service is needed to the extent that they feel it's needed and it principally has to do with preparation of payment estimates for the contractor, inspection of the project at various stages such as checking excavation, they check the forming and the rebar placement prior t concrete pours, and they check various things throughout the progress of the project, but they're not out there all the time. And Mr. Ankenman won't be out there all the time either. But he will be there all the time when it's necessary for him to be there. Anderson: So should this help save of the costs like some of the foul ups we had with the last expansion out there with walls falling over that - Smith: No, it won't take care of a situation like that. Because that just happened from a previous construction. But and I can't address that because I don't know what caused that or why it what happened happened. I don't know. There could have been some MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 75 inspection problems on that job that caused rebar to not be placed in the right position that caused the failure, I don't know. But the thing that we have to do is at the end of the project we have to submit a certification to DEQ that the project was designed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the way it's been, we're saying yeah, but not very firmly. This gives us a better handle on what's actually done and what's done is done in accordance with the specifications and the drawings. It also ensures since so much of this project is underground that what's done is done in accordance with the plans. Anderson: Is this contract, is it set up similar to the plumbing and mechanical and electrical inspectors so it doesn't imply that he's a city employee entitled to benefits and retirement and all that? Smith: I think so. I think Mr. Gigray reviewed it in that light. Bird: He has to furnish us all those certificates for his company. Corrie: Any other questions? Mr. Rountree, do you want to bring the motion? Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we enter into a contractual agreement with Akenman Construction to hire construction inspection activity at the rate of $40 per hour not to exceed an expenditure of $45,000 for the two construction projects at the Wastewater Treatment Plant, authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird to approve the construction inspection contract and the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. C. CONTRACT MODIFICATION - USTICK RESERVOIR & BOOSTER PUMP STATION: (APPROVE) Smith: Thank you Mayor and Council. The next item I have is the contract modification number one for the Ustick Reservoir and Booster Pump Station. This is a modification to the contract with McAlvain Construction for 22 days of time added to their contract time. This extension was requested by McAlvain and it was requested on the basis of inclimate weather during the month of February and I had CH2M research the climatolgoical data for that period of time and they came back with a report that February of 1999 rainfall ranked third out of 60 years of record that's been kept by the weather bureau. So on that basis, it was their recommendation to me and I passed that MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 171 1999 PAGE 76 recommendation on to you to increase the length of time for the contract of McAlvain Construction to build the water tank and pump station from July 8th, 1999 to July 30th, 1999. This is a time only increase in the contract. The amount of the contract does not change. Corrie: Any questions of Council? Bird: Yes, Mr. Mayor. Gary, now if I read this right, the revised says July 30th. Smith: Yes, sir. Bird: And they signed this on July 24th knowing they had just five days to complete the job? Smith: Right. We had requested this for some time and we just finally got it. This is - Bird: What is their liquidated damages Gary? Smith: $750 per day. I've notified the contractor that he is on - we are claiming liquidated damages on the project. Their bonding company has been notified also. Those letters went out today. Bird: Let's get somebody's attention. How far away are they really away from finishing? Smith: Well they've given us a revised schedule of September 8th, but in talking to CH2M unless things really fly fast we're going to be into October. Bird: I was going to say it looks like to me they're along September 8th would be a miracle because they've still got a lot of stuff hanging around there. Smith: DYK is on the site now with their pre-stressing machine setting up to wrap the tank. In fact they're going to have some kind of - I got an invitation today in the mail they're going to have a formal presentation on the 25th I believe it is with a lunch at Spurwing and a demonstration of the wrapping process afterwards. Bentley: You going to put a bow on it? Bird: Is this part of their contract or is this a separate contract, the wrapping? Smith: No, it's part of the construction with - Bird: Part of McAlvains? ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17,1999 PAGE 77 Smith: Yes, sir. It's part of the tank right. Gigray: You sure that isn't music. Bird: I wonder if these poor guys know they're in penalty already. No, I mean the wrapping company. Smith: Oh, the wrapping company, I don't know. YeahJ it's a contract. It's one of their subcontractors. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we approve the 22 day extension of time to the Ustick Reservoir and Booster Pump project to completion date of July 30th, 1999, with no increase in contract dollar amount. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird to approve the contract modification. Any further discussion? All in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. D. BID RESULTS / AWARD 1999 WATERLINE PROJECT PHASE 1 OVERLAND ROAD TO EAGLE ROAD: (APPROVE) Smith: Thank you Mayor and Council. The next item I have is the report to you on the bid opening that we held on August 12th for the construction of a waterline project phase one. There were six bids that were opened. The letter that's in your packet from JUS Engineers to Brad Watson lists those six bidders. Brown Construction is the low bidder. $152,516.25. This will construct the waterline along Eagle Road in front of St. Luke's south to a point where we will cross under Eagle Road with a bore exiting at the north side of the proposed Holiday Inn Express Motel continuing on to the west to Allen Street and then south and west along the frontage road to 1-84, and looping over to I think they call it Wells Circle and ending the terminus at this piece of the project ends at a point between Mr. Fuhrman's property and Ms. Burkett's I think Buckert's property on the north side of the interstate. On the south side of the interstate this project will extend the waterline in Overland Road from the property line between Mr. and Mrs. Peck and Van Auker used to be the Thomas property west and connect to CESCO. And the developer Craig Groves and Gary Voigt will be and they just opened bids on that project will be extending water from connecting these two points so that we have a water line extension under the interstate. Bird: Gary, you know, how comfortable to do you feel with Brown Construction's bid? mean at least $70,000 under the estimate. He's $25,000 under the next bidder. ( \ MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 78 Smith: I did not talk to Brown's to ask that question, but I haven't heard a word from anybody that there's a problem. JUS hasn't contacted us. Apparently Brown hasn't contacted them. They're a very reputable company. Bird: Yeah, I know they're very reputable. Smith: I would suspect they were also low bidder on the other piece. Bird: That probably adds up then. Smith: That Voigt and Craig Groves bid, so they would be the contractor on the whole thing assuming they're awarded that other piece too. Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we award the bid to Brown Construction for the waterline project phase 1 Overland Road at Eagle Road in the amount of $152,516.25. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to award the bid to Brown Construction Company in the amount of $152,516.25. Any other discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. E. AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH B & F ENTERPRISES: (APPROVE) Smith: Thank Mayor and Council. The last item I have is a request for signature on an easement agreement between B & F Enterprises. This has to do with our water sewer line extension under the interstate. 8 & F Enterprises owns a piece of property on the north side of the interstate. It's also bordered by Well's Drive I believe it is and we would be extending sewer and water along their west boundary. We originally had a sewer easement from 8 & F Enterprises for the line that was to be extended several years ago by the developer which didn't take place. Now that we're also extending water through there, we went back to this property owner and requested an amendment to that agreement and that's what I've presented to you this evening. All is well with the agreement. There is one stipulation that 8 & F Enterprises asked for and it's inserted here as item 2.3 under section two that if a waterline or sewer line is not constructed in the easement area within two years of the date of this amendment is signed, this amendment and the sewer line easement dated 22 December, 1995 will become null and void. That's not an issue because we're going to proceed with the waterline. But B ( -- MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 79 & F wanted that inserted into this amendment and Mr. Gigray has prepared this I believe. Is that correct? Gigray: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, that's correct. We did prepare it and I've worked with Gary on this and we've gone through a number of avenues about how this could be done, and I think we've come up with the best solution all the way around and I think Gary is satisfied that the work can be done, and I think what we would do and my recommendation to Gary is once the work is completed that we should file some type of certificate that we would record that the city has completed the work in compliance with that so there's no ambiguity in the record that we have completed one or both of the lines. Corrie: Any further discussion? Rountree: Mr. Mayor I move that we approve the amendment to the easement agreement with B & F Enterprises, authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Rountree second by Mr. Bird to approve the amendment of the easement agreement. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. 2. KENNY BOWERS: A. COLLECTIVE LABOR AGREEMENT WITH UNION #2311: (NO AGREEMENT) Bowers: Mayor Corrie and City Council, on the contract with the union, we have not come up with an agreement yet to satisfy both parties. We are going to try to meet again next Wednesday night the 25th if you can make it and see if we can finalize it at that time. I do have a question on a contract though. We was presented a proposal by Emergency Services Consulting Group to evaluate the fire department. The price was $24,600. I had Mr. Gigray go through the contract in the book. He said he did not have any problems with the wording. It was very well worded out. His concern was where the RFP was at and where the other bids were for this project. At this time, I had mentioned that ~o Ron. He doesn't know of any other companies that do evaluations for fire departments, so we are thinking maybe this is a single item possibly that maybe we would not have to have an RFP or maybe three bids for it. ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 80 Corrie: Kenny, you're probably right, but that wasn't in your agenda. If it's going to take a Council decision I would rather you do it next the September meeting. We are running a big problem with time. Anderson: Well we had budgeted the money in this year's budget. If we don't use that then there's no appropriation in next year's budget to have that evaluation done. Corrie: (Inaudible) Anderson: I think most of those when you have them done I think require about (inaudible). Bird: But if you enter into the contract Ron before October 1st it still has to come out of this money. Don't it? (Inaudible) Bird: If we pass it on the 7th, will that give you time to get it signed? And did we put out an RFI or is this the gentleman that come in and was very impressive? Anderson: (Inaudible) Bird: Yeah, I don't either and I don't know on a consultant do you have to have an RFI? Do you have to - if it's under $25,000, do you have to have three bidders as a consultant? I don't know. Gigray: If they're not engineers or architects or whatever covered under that statute, I don't know that these guys are. Rountree: But yeah they wouldn't be covered under the professional agreements clause, but I think since it's under $25,000 we're probably all right. Bird: You don't have to have the three bids then. We'd be all right. Gigray: I don't think it hurts any to put on the record that there's no knowledge of any other persons that can perform this function. Corrie: Under those conditions it's not publicized as that and if you can have them do it the 7th, I'd be more comfortable with the fact that we didn't put it on the agenda. Because we're making a decision that wasn't publicized. Okay, what else do you got? B. LINE ITEM ADJUSTMENTS: (APPROVE) ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 81 Bowers: Budget line item changes. I ran over on my vehicle maintenance again this year, and I have switched from some funds from the building fund, the fuel fund and the ICRMP fund to make up $5,000 in the vehicle maintenance. I thought maybe I'd try to do that tonight before the rush hits next month. Is there any questions on why we went over? Corrie: Any other discussion or question on that? Anderson: I would make a motion that we approve the line item transfers in the fire department budget in the amount of $5,000 to be transferred into that vehicle maintenance. Rountree: Second. Corrie: Motion made by Mr. Anderson second by Mr. Rountree to adjust the line item transfer of $5,000 to vehicle maintenance. Any other discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Bowers: Mayor Corrie and City Council, I wanted to keep you in the loop on the new fire station being built. ZGA has contracted with Materials Testing and Inspections to do the masonry, the concrete testing, the asphalt testing and the soils testing as they go along and construct it. It will be right around $3,000. Bird: Who was that firm? Bowers: Materials Testing and Inspections. (I naud ible) Bowers: Thank you Mayor and Council appreciate it. Corrie: )'11 entertain a motion to adjourn. Bird: So moved. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to adjourn. All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE 82 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 12:35 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APP VED: ATTEST: ( ?..... -'";,.-;- · DesK of the, Eiite ',Ghief' ~N /-" ...... "i;:~: ..... -:.: '>. -::. ..... ..,. -:, ;,-.:.-~ "" '/ 7' ;- ~ " ....: .....:- , ' Dv~VDTDT.~ ~. 'l\ .D~....J _.=._...1-..... \; ~ j 1 1 LV.. ~J~~jJ AU6 1 3 1999 CITY OF ~IERIDIM~ To: Mayor Robert Come and City Council From:K.W. Bowers cc: file Date: 08/12/99 Re: Line Item Budget Adjustment Meridian Fire has spent more funds than was budgeted in the vehicle maintenance line item. We would like to shift funds from other line items to cover the funds. 2210-53100 is for vehicle maintenance and repair. We went over because of replacing brakes on several trucks. . Page 1 E-i Z ~ ~ ~ P-i ~ a ..... Z ::J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :: 0 0 0 <x: ... ... ... (Y) r--I r-i {/)- {/)- {I}- 0 ~ l- I-- ~ ~ ~ \.0 Z 0 0 0 ::) W r-I r--I r-i 0 LL (Y) ('l') M en L() L() 1.f) u Z I I I U <( 0 0 0 <( ~ r--I r-I r-i l- N N N N N N ~ 0 =It: c::: I- u.. z et= ::> 0 w 0 r-I M U lJ.. 0 0 0 en r-I N (j') U Z M N r-- <( <( L.f) If) 1.f) c::: I I I 0 0 0 t- r--I r--I r-I N N N r'\. 1 r'\.1 '-"'1 +J Q) 01 : : rcJ ::s ,..q ~ Q) ~ = : 0 ~ Z .r-! 0 ro O-l i= Q) <C H Z : : ro <C s::: ...J ro 0- X Q) w (J s::: cO ~ : : Q) +.1 s::: -,.., ct1 S Q) r-i = : (J -,-{ ...c: Q) ~ ...J <{ m > W (j) 0 l- I 0::: <( N n.. r-I Q I CL 00 <{ 2 e::: zO <(u. -0::: Ow (2u. wUJ 2Z u.<( O~ >-1- t-w -C) Uc ::> CO ~ H ~ :z ~ H Q H ~ ~ ( AUGUST 17. 1999 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APPLICANT: REQUEST: WATER I SEWER I TRASH DELINQUENCIES AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: --11 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY A TIORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: COMMENTS ~)./ ~~ or Jfl yv IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at pUblic meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APPLICANT: REQUEST: APPOINTMENT OF NEW P & Z COMMISSIONERS AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE OEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. AUGUST 17. 1999 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: -L I~ I.vV vV ~VV.~{V'v {LAY MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17. 1999 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: -L APPLICANT: REQUEST: FULL TIME MAYOR ORDINANCE AGENCY COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED MINUTES & ORDINANCE CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING OEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: t v.J-/ (1 ~(O ? t to ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRtGA TION: JDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at publiC meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APPLICANT: AUGUST 3.. 1999 AGENCY ITEM NUMBER: -L- REQUEST ORDINANCE FOR FULL TIME MAYOR AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED ORDINANCE CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING OEPT: k:Eef Gl/J~1i)Jcr oePJI\JAAXE CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. interoffice MEMORANDUM From: Marlene St. Geo . RECEI\JED J U L 2 9 1999 CITY OF MERIDlAl'I To: William G. Berg, Jr. Subject: ORDINANCES FULL-TIME MAYOR Date: July 29, 1999 Will: Please find attached the original of the ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR, which pertains to the Mayor being a full-time position. I have also attached the original of the CREATION OF FIRE DEPT. ORDINANCE. (I previously faxed over this ordinance so Linda could malce copies for the packets.) If you have any questions please advise. RECEIVE[ () ~UL 2 8 ~g~g ~ Alt~t of MendIan 1I~~lel'k Office ~ CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY COUNCIL MEMBER: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 1. AND 2. AND PROVIDING FOR A NEW SUBSECTION 3. AND RENUMBERING THE SUBSECTIONS THEREAFTER; PROVIDING THAT THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR BE A FULL TIME POSITION; PROVIDING THAT THE MAYOR IS THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL OF THE CITY AND SHALL PRESIDE OVER MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND DETERMINE THE ORDER OF BUSINESS, SUBJECT TO THE RULES OF THE COUNCIL, AND TO HAVE SUPERINTENDING CONTROL OVERALL OFFICERS AND AFFAIRS OF THE CITY, PRESERVE ORDER, AND TAI<E CARE THAT THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY, AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE IDAHO STATE LAW GOVERNING MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ARE COMPLIED WITH; AND PROVIDING IN THE RENUMBERED SUBSECTIONS 4. 5. AND 6. A CHANGE OF THE WORD "HE" TO THE WORDS "THE MAYOR" ALL IN SECTION 3 OF CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE I MERIDIAN CITY CODE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: SECTION I: That Subsection A. I. and 2. and providing for a new subsection 3. and renumbering the subsections thereafter and providi11g for the new subsections 4., 5., and 6. to change the word "He" to the words "The Mayor" in section 3 of Chapter 6 of Title 1 Meridian City Code of the City of Meridian be amended and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-6-3 A. Generally: .-" I. The I\1aJ~or shall dC"'vyotc so luueh of his tini.c to the duties of his office as all efficicr'Lt and faithf"LIl discharge thercof ITLay~ require. The efficient and faithful discharge of the duties of the office of the Mayor shall be a full time elected position. ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - I J f,e- t1 c/ C {h;+o- 13~ 3> -qc; ( 2. He shall [r0111 ti111.C to ti111C giv'"c tIlc Council suel.. ir'lfor1nation , a1ld rcc01nnLc1Ld such 11lcasurcs as ILc 11lay" dCCI1L bCILcficial to tILc City". The Mayor shall be the chief adn1inistrative official of the city, preside over the meetings of the city council and determi11e tl1e order of bllsiness subject to such rllles as the COlll1cillnay prescribe, have a vote only when the council is equally divided, have the sllperintending control of all the officers and affairs in the city, preserve order, and tal,e care that the ordinances of the city, and the provisions of the Idaho State Law governing Mtlnicipal corporations are con1plied vvith. 3. The Mayor shall, frOITI time to time, commllnicate to the city council such information and recommend such measures as, in his opinion, may tend to the improvement of the finances, the protection, the health, the security, the ornament, the comfort, and the geI1eral welfare and prosperity of the city. 3-:-1. He The Mayor shall examine the grounds of all complaints against any of t~e officers of the City to determine existence of a violation or neglect of duty, and report the evidence thereof, if deemed sufficient for the removal of said officer, to the Council. 4:-2. He The Mayor shall require that every officer, on the expiration of his term of office or resignation or removal from the same, deliver to his successor all monies, bool,s, paper, maps, plats, furniture, flXtures, apparatus, machinery, tools a11d instruments and appurtenances belonging to such office. 5..!i. He The Mayor shall perform all other duties imposed by the laws of the State: B. Sign Contracts: The Mayor is authorized and empowered to sign his name officially for and in behalf of the City on all contracts, including deeds, bonds, bills, notes, obligations, and other agreerne11ts, documents and papers to which the City is a party, and to require that the conditions in the said instruments are faithfully performed, and to borrow money on the credit of the City when authorized by the COllncil. (Ord. 140,8-30-1965) ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - 2 ( c. Veto Povver: The Mayor shall have pOvver to veto or sign any ordinance passed by the City Council; provided, that any ordinance vetoed by the Mayor may be passed over his veto by a vote of one-half (V2) plus one of the members of the Council elected notvvithstanding the veto, and ShOl.lld the Mayor neglect or refuse to sign any ordinances and return the same with his objection, in writing, at the next regtllar meeting of the Council, the same shall become a law without his signature. D. Accounts And Reports Of Officers: The Mayor shall have the power, when he deems it necessary, to require any officer of the City to exhibit his accounts or other papers, and to mal,e reports to the Council in vvriting, touching any sllbject or matter he may require pertaining to his office. E. Police Powers: The Mayor shall have jurisdiction, as may be vested in him by ordinance, over all places within five (5) miles of the corporate limits of the City, for the enforcement of any health or quarantine ordinance and regulation thereof, and shall have jurisdiction in all matters vested in him by ordinance, excepting taxation, within one ll1ile of the corporate limits of the City, and over such properties as may be owned by the City without the corporate limits. F. May Require Aid In Enforcing Law: The Mayor is hereby authorized to call on every male inhabitant in the City over twenty one (21) years of age to aid in enforcing the laws. (Ord. 140,8-30-1965; amd. 1999 Code) G. Special Meetings Of Council: The Mayor shall have the power to call special meetings of the City Council, the object of which shall be submitted to the Council in vvriting; the call and object, as well as the disposition thereof, shall be entered upon the jourRal by the City CIerI,. (1999 Code) H. Other Powers: The Mayor shall have all other powers granted by the laws of the State of Idahol. (Ord. 140,8-30-1965) 1 I.C. S 50-602 et seq. ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - 3 ( SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herevvith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that a11Y section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding cOffilnenced or right accrued before this ordinance tal(es effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect within one (I) month after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of _ ' 1999. APPROVED" BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE ATTEST: CITY CLERI( msglZ:\ W ork\M\M.eridian 15360M\Ordinances\CITY GOVERNMENT ORD INANCES\ProvisionMayorOrd063099 ORDINANCE AlvlENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY COUNCIL MEMBER: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 1. AND 2. AND PROVIDING FOR A NEW SUBSECTION 3. AND RENUMBERING THE SUBSECTIONS THEREAFTER; PROVIDING THAT THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR BE A FULL TIME POSITION; PROVIDING THAT THE MAYOR IS THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL OF THE CITY AND SHALL PRESIDE OVER MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND DETERMINE THE ORDER OF BUSINESS, SUBJECT TO THE RULES OF THE COUNCIL, AND TO HAVE SUPERINTENDING CONTROL OVER ALL OFFICERS AND AFFAIRS OF THE CITY, PRESERVE ORDER, AND TAICE CARE THAT THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY, AND THE PROVISIONS .OF THE IDAHO STATE LAW GOVERNING MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ARE COMPLIED WITH; AND PROVIDING IN THE RENUMBERED SUBSECTIONS 4. 5. AND 6. A CHANGE OF THE WORD "HE" TO THE WORDS "THE MAYOR" ALL IN SECTION 3 OF CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE I MERIDIAN CITY CODE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Subsection A. 1. and 2. and providing for a new subsection 3. and renumbering the subsections thereafter and providing for the new subsections 4., 5., and 6. to change the word "He" to the words "The Mayor" in section 3 of Chapter 6 of Title I Meridian City Code of the City of Meridian be amended and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-6-3 A. Generally: 1. The 1\..1a)~or shall dC"vTotc so much of his time to the duties of his office as an efficient and faithful discharge thereof lTIay require. The efficient and faithful discharge of the duties of the office of the Mayor shall be a full time elected position. ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - I 2. He shall from time to time girv~e the Council such i11fonnation , and recOIUmCli.d such II'leasures as hc may dCClTI beneficial to the Cit)7. The Mayor shall be the chief administrative official of the city, preside over the meetings of the city council and determine the order of business subject to such rules as the council may prescribe, have a vote only when the council is equally divided, have the superintending control of all the officers and affairs in the city, preserve order, and take care that the ordinances of the city, and the provisions of the Idaho State Law governing Municipal corporations are complied with. 3. The Mayor shall, from time to time, communicate to the city council such information and recommend such measures as, in his opinion, may tend to the improvement of the finances, the protection, the health, the security, the ornament, the comfort, and the general welfare and prosperity of the city. 3-:-.1. He The Mayor shall examine the grounds of all complaints against any of the officers of the City to determine existence of a violation or neglect of duty, and report the evidence thereof, if deemed sufficient for the removal of said officer, to the Council. 4-:-2.. He The Mayor shall require that every officer, on the expiration of his term of office or resignation or removal from the same, deliver to his successor all monies, booles, paper, maps, plats, furniture, fixtures, apparatus, machinery, tools and instruments and appurtenances belonging to such office. 5.~ He The Mayor shall perform all other duties imposed by the laws of the State: B. Sign Contracts: The Mayor is authorized and empowered to sign his nalne officially for and in behalf of the City on all contracts, including deeds, bonds, bills, notes, obligations, and other agreements, documents and papers to which the City is a party, and to require that the conditions in the said instruments are faithfully performed, and to borrow money on the credit of the City when authorized by the Council. (Ord. 140, 8-30-1965) ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - 2 c. Veto Power: The Mayor shall have power to veto or sign any ordinance passed by the City Council; provided, that any ordinance vetoed by the Mayor may be passed over his veto by a vote of one-half (1/2) plus one of the members of the Council elected notwithstanding the veto, and should the Mayor neglect or refuse to sign any ordinances and return the same with his objection, in writing, at the next regular meeting of the Council, the same shall become a law without his signature. D. Accounts And Reports Of Officers: The Mayor shall have the power, when he deems it necessary, to require any officer of the City to exhibit his accounts or other papers, and to mal(e reports to the Council in writing, touching any subject or matter he may require pertaining to his office. E. Police Powers: The Mayor shall have jurisdiction, as may be vested in him by ordinance, over all places within five (5) miles of the corporate limits of the City, for the enforcement of any health or quarantine ordinance and regulation thereof, and shall have jurisdiction in all matters vested in him by ordinance, excepting taxation, within one mile of the corporate limits of the City, and over such properties as may be owned by the City without the corporate limits. F. May Require Aid In Enforcing Law: The Mayor is hereby authorized to call on every male inhabitant in the City over twenty one (21) years of age to aid in enforcing the laws. (Ord. 140, 8-30-1965; amd. 1999 Code) G. Special Meetings Of Council: The Mayor shall have the power to call special meetings of the City Council, the object of which shall be submitted to the Council in writing; the call and object, as well as the disposition thereof, shall be entered upon the journal by the City Clerk. (1999 Code) H. Other Powers: The Mayor shall have all other powers granted by the laws of the State of Idahol. (Ord. 140,8-30-1965) 1 I.C. S 50-602 et seq. ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - 3 SECTION 2: All ordinances, resoluti~ns, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this ordinance talces effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect within one (1) month after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE ATTEST: CITY CLERI( msgiZ:\ W or k\M\Meridian 153 60M\Ordinances\CITY GOVERNMENT 0 RD INANCES\ProvisionMayorOrd063099 ORDINANCE AMENDING PROVISION FOR MAYOR - 4 ( CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and The State Tax Comn1ission of the State of Idaho I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City ClerI<, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No. _' passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian, on the day of I 999, is a true and correct copy of the original of said dOCllment which is in the care, custody and control of the City ClerIc of the City of Meridian. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. STATE OF IDAHO, ) 55. COl.lnty of Ada, On this day of , in the year 1999, before me, , a Notary Pl..lblic, appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., l<nown or identified to me to be the City ClerIc of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and aclmowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Commission Expires: msg\Z:\ W ork\M\Meri dian 15360 M\Ordinances\CITY GOVERNMENT 0 RD I NAN CES\Certifi cati on 0 Eel er kOrd CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17.1999 APPLICANT: CONSENT AGENDA AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ~ REQUEST: MEMORANDUM CHERRY LANE GOLF COURSE AGREEMENT AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMtTTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMA liON: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become prop ( SEE ATTACHED MEMO vy../ C1f p RECEIVED AUG 1 3 1999 CITY OF MERIDlAL'I interoffice MEMORANDUM RECEIVED AUG 1 3 1999 CITY OF MERIDIAN To: Mayor Robert D. Corrie Councilman Ron Anderson Councilman Glenn Bentley Councilman Keith Bird Councilman Charlie Rountree William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk Wm. F. Gigray, III /t:fIr1 f MEMORANDUM OF LEASE A REE E MERIDIAN AND CHERRY LANE REC / cf BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATION, INC. From: Subject: File No.: 4.1.1.A and CUP-99-009 Date: August 11, 1999 Please find attached the Memorandum of Lease Agreement which I have prepared in order to accommodate Pioneer Title Company's request as a condition of issuance of title insurance, and which is required by the BarrIe in order for it to issue to the City the Letter of Credit, required of Cherry Lane Recreation, Inc., for the golf course clubhouse project. This Memorandum will be executed by both parties and recorded if approved by the City Council. Please note that the Memorandum of Lease Agreement is required by the Title Company as the lease agreement does not described the second nine holes, even though it was contemplated in the lease to include the same. msglZ:\ W ork\M\Meridian 15360 M\Cherry Lane Land Exchange\MayorCouncilClkO 811 99 .Ltr MEMORANDUM OF LEASE AGREEMENT PARTIES: Lessor: City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation Lessee: Cherry Lane Recreation, Inc., an Idaho Corporation REAL PROPERTY: Those certail1 parcels of real property located in the City of Meridian, COU11ty of Ada, State of Ida11o, a11d more particlllarly described in Exl1ibit "A" attached hereto and consisting of eight (8) pages, and by this reference incorporated herein. THIS IS TO ACI<NOWLEDGE AND TO GIVE NOTICE to the world that tl1e above nall1ed parties l1ave entered into that certain lease agreelne11t e11titled, "AGREEMENT OF LEASE" on the 3rd day of October, 1978, the origi11al of'vvhich is 011 file with the Citv Clerl( of the City of Meridian at the Meridian City Hall, which ~ ~/ .,I agreelnent is in full force and effect and vv11ich agreement provides for t11e lease of the real property described herein. Dated t11is day of AUgtlst, 1 999. ACI<NOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein execllted t11is agree111ent a11d Made it effective as hereinabove provided. CHERRY LANE RECREATION, INC. BY: Wallace D. Lovan, President BY: Ve11ita I. Lova11 J\llEMORANDUi\;l OF LEASE AGREEMENT - PAGE lOF 3 CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: NlAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE Attest: CITY CLERl( BY RESOLUTION NO. STATE OF IDAHO :ss COUNTY OF ADA On this_ day of Allgust, in the year 1999, before il1e, a Notary Public, perso11ally appeared WALLACE D. LOY AN al1d VENITA I. LOVAN, ImoWl1 or identified to 111e to be the Preside11t and of the Cherry -, Lane Recreation, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, and who executed t11e instrtl111e11t or the person that execllted the instnllnent on behalf of said corporation, and acl<11owledge to 111e t11at slich corporation execllted the same. (SEAL) N otarv Public for Idaho ./ C0111111ission expires: Ivl EIvl 0 RAN DUM OF LEASE AGREEMENT - PAGE 20F 3 ( STATE OF IDAHO :ss ) day of August, in the year 1999, before n1e, a Notary Public, County of Ada On this perso11ally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., l<novvn or identified to n1e to be the Mayor and Clerl(, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instnln1e11t or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and aclG10vvledged to n1e that such City executed the san1e. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho COll1mission expires: MEMORANDUivl OF LEASE AGREEMENT - PAGE 30F 3 File Number; P183117 SCHEDULE C The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: PARCEL I A PARCEL OF LANO BEING A PORTION OF THE WEST-HALF, SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIANr MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A BRASS CAP MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, 80ISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3} NORTH 88 DEGREES 55'29" WEST 2643.29 FEET TO A BRASS CAP MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER/ THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY NORTH 75 DEGREES 30'Qon WEST 190.00 FEET TO A 2- IRON PIPE; THENCE NORTH 40 DEGREES 00'00. WEST 40.00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 59J31a WEST 70~OO FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 25 DEGREES OOJoon WEST 64.19 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25'06- WEST 254.51 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89 DEGREES 25'06- EST 100.01 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 30' 1 ,., \NEST 407.92 FEET TO A PO INT; THENCE SOUTH 68 DEGREES 54'11. EAST 276.46 FEET TO A POINT MARKING A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 59.46 FeET, SAID CURVE HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34 DEGREES 04'10., A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET) TANGENTS OF 30.64 FEET AND A LONG CHORD OF 58.59 FEET BEARING SOUTH 51 DEGREES 52'06- EAST TO A POINT MARKING A POINT OF TANGENTS; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 50J01. EAST 292.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 48'41. EAST 147.34 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 35 DEGREES 00'00. WEST 109.03 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES 45'00" WEST 580.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREE 29~4411 EAST 335~18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCel II A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALf AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE' WEST, BOISE MERIDIANJ MERIDIAN) ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 8EGINNING AT A POINT MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 3; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25'06" EAST 2,077.73 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THe SAID NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALf OF SECTION 3 TO A POINT, ALSO SAID POINT BEING THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 29J44d WEST 335.18 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 51 DEGREES 45'000 EAST 580.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 00.0011 EAST 285.33 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 22 DEGREES 15'OOu WEST 6a~a5 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 43 DEGREES 58'10" EAST 238.75 FE~T TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 00'00. EAST 110.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 61 DEGREES Go'ooa EAST 81 ,19 FE~J TO A POINT OF CURVE; THE~CE LEGAL CONTINUED EXHIBIT "A" TO MEMORANDUM OF LEASE AGREEMENT File Number: P183117 PAGE 2 PARCEL II (CONT.) NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 147.14 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48 DEGREES 10'28~} A RADIUS OF 175.00 FEET, TANGENTS OF 78.23 FEET AND A LONG CHORD OF 142.84 FEET SEARING NORTH 36 DEGREES 54146~ EAST TO A POINT OF ENDING OF CURVE; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 30'0011 WESi 151.38 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 41 DEGREES 30'QQu WEST 203.92 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 17 DEGREES 15'00. WEST 94.14 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 22 DEGREES 15'OOu EAST 147.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 50'00" EAST 45.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 20'00~ EAST 78.40 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 68 DEGREES 00'00.j EAST 61 ~ 48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 33'2511 EAST 88.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 60 DEGREES OOJOQ" EAST 108.33 FEET TO A POINT OF BEGINNING OF CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT 139.32 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2S DEGREES 35j19~, A RADIUS OF 311.95 FEET, TANGENTS OF 70.84 FEET AND ALONG CHORD OF 138.'6 FEET SEA.RING NORTH 56 DEGREES 12'20" ~~ST TO A POINT OF TANGENT; THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 00'00. EAST 115.08 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT 125.75 FEETJ SAID CURVE HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 24 DEGREES 25'22", A RADIUS OF 295.00 FEET, TANGENTS OF 63.84 FEET AND A LONG CHORD OF 124.80 FEET BEA.RING NORTH 56 DEGREES 47'19" EAST TO A POINT OF ENDING OF CURVE; THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES OO'OQu WEST 79.63 FEET TO A POINT; THENC~ NORTH 67 DEGREES 45'000 WEST 160.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 65 DEGREES 50'OO~ weST 244.67 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 50 DEGREES 30'00" WEST 114135 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES OQJQQu EAST 90.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 17 DEGREES 00'0011 WEST 175.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES oa'oo~ EAST 280.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 77 DEGRE~S 30roo~ WEST 170.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 68 DEGRE=S OOJOO- WEST 265~OO FEET TO A POINT MARKING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH i5 DEGREES 3010011 WEST 190.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NOJ1TH 40 DEGREES 00'00" WEST 40.00 FE=T TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 59'31" WEST 70.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 25 DEGREES 00 J 00" \\'EST 64 ~ 19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25)06" 'NEST 254.51 FEET ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 3 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: CHERRY LANE VILLAGE NO. 1 SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 44 OF PLATS AT PAGES 3537 AND 3538, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY) IDAHO; CHERRY LANE VILLAGE NO. 2 SUBDIVISION) ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 46 OF PLATS AT PAGES 3791 AND 3792, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; THE L~KE AT CHERRY LANE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 52 OF PLATS AT PAGES 4569 AND 4570, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTYj IDAHO; THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO.2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF FILEQ IN BOOK 54 OF PLATS AT PAGES 4882 AND 4883, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; LEGA.L CONTINUED EXHIBIT ~'A" TO NIEMORANDUIvl OF LEASE AGREEMENT File Number~ P183117 PAGE 3 PARCEL II (CONT.) THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 4 SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 74 OF PLATS AT PAGES 7674 AND 7675, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. PARC~L III..A A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH~ RANGE 1 WESTJ 80ISE MERIDIAN, ME~IDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 4, 9, 10 AND THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'11- EAST 2651.19 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS SAME WAY REESTABLISHED BY LS 972 (CP & F INSTRUMENT NO. 7852146, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO); FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 BEARS NORTH 0 DEGREE 38127" EAST 2697.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38J27U EAST 22~64 FEET TO A 5/8~ IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55131- EAST 379.53 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55'31n EAST 182.65 FEET TO A POINTj THENCE SOUTH 8 DEGREES 18'10u EAST 440.66 F~ET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 18J25~ WEST 218,04 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 13' 51" EAST 540.22 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 71 DEGREES 43'3411 EAST 442.46 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 1 0 DEGREES 33 1 50 a E!\ST 487",84 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55)3'. EAST 124.84 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 50 DEGREES 38'25~ EAST 89.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 165.33 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT] HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.25 FEET} A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37 DEGREES 51'08", AND A LONG CHORD BEARING SOUTH 31 DEGREES 42'52" EAST '62~34 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 29J44- WEST 120.24 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 4 DEGREE 27117u EAST 80.30 FEET'TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 30 J 16 '. WEST 230.52 FEET TO A PO INT; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 31'2011 WEST 123.51 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGFiEES 14J07U WEST 119.57 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 50 DEGRE~S 50'29N WEST 134.39 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 28J48- WEST 120.54 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 82 DEGREES 45'52u WEST 225.84 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 02'57" WEST 67,30 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 10'41- WEST 825,06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 77 DEGREES 29)20~ WEST 148.0i FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 10'41" WEST 160.40 FEET TO A POINT LYING 65.00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID S~CTION 3; THENCE ALONG A LINE 65.00 fEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 3 NORTH 0 DEGREES 38'" H E.~ST 247.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21 J 49" E.L\ST 156.03 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 03)1611 EP--ST 163.61 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 5 DEGREES 39'31. EAST 502.42 FE=T TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGAL CONTINUED EXHIBIT "A" TO MENI0RAJ."fDUNl OF LEASE AGREEMENT File Number: P183117 PAGE 4 PARCEL III-B A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST] BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIEED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 41 9) 10 AND THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38",11 EAST 2651.19 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS SAME WAS REESTABLISHED 8Y LS 972 (CP & F INSTRUMENT NO. 7852146, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, !DAHO); FORM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 BEARS NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'27- EAST 2697.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGJiEE 38'27- EAST 22.64 FEET TO A 5/811 IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 56'3111 EAST 1977 172 FEET TO A 5/8.. IRON PIN AND THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 30'15u WEST 413.59 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 68 DEGREES 54'1111 WEST 26.71 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NOATH 68 DEGREES 54 ~ 111. WEST 26.71 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 30'15M EAST 217.93 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 211.88 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 249.75 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48 DEGREES 36'25. AND A LONG CHORD BEARING NORTH 23 DEGREES 47'57" WEST 205458 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55'31- EAST 109~62 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCJ:L IV-A A PORTION OF SOU~ST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 'NEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCMIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 4, 9, 10 AND THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38J1111 EAST, 2651.19 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTION 3 AND 4 AS SAME WAS REESTABLISHED BY LS 972 (CP & F INSTRUMENT NO. 7852146) RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO); FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 BEARS NORTH 0 DEGREE 38J27M EAST, 2697.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38J27" EAST 22.64 FEET TO A 5/8M IRON prN~ THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55J31~ EAST) 379.53 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 5 DEGREE 39 I 3' I~ EAST, 290.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 46.45 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON.TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 DEGREES 38J46-, AND A LONG CHORD BEARING SOU~ 49 DEGREES 22J43- EAST, 46.39 F:ET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREES 03'20a EAST, 136.41 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 8 DEGREES 18J10. EAST, 165.80 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 55J31~ WEST, 182.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARC!l !V.S A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE' WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN: MERIDIAN~ ADA COUNTY, IDAHO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEJ AS FOLLOWS: LEGAL CONTINUED EXHIBIT "A" TO MEMORANDUTvl OF LEASE AGREEIvlENT File Number: P183117 PAGE 5 PACREl IV.B (CONT.) COMMENCING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 4, 9, 10 AND THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'11" EAST) 2651.19 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTION 3 AND 4 AS SAME WAS REESTABLISHED BY LS 972 (CP & F INSTRUMENT NO. 7852146) RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO); FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 BEARS NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'27'\ EAST, 2697.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38~27M EAST 22.64 FEET TO A s/aD IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55'31- EAST, 834.71 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 04J2911 EAST, 77.45 FEET TO THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 199.31 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 270.00 FEETJ A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42 DEGREES 17'41~ AND A LONG CHORD BEARING NORTH 65 DEGREES 12J11" WEST, 194.81 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES 03M20. WEST, 198.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREE 381105" EAST, 125.90 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 4 DEGREES 26'2Qu WEST, '78~94 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 49 DEGREES 13'43u WEST, 619.18 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 21J33D WEST, 39.i2 FEET TO A POINTj THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'27- EAST) 178.61 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21'33- EAST, 104.94 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 26 DEGREES 46'55- EAST) 463.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 13 DEGREES 05J08M EAST, 186.18 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 23'04M EASTJ 221.37 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 36'56R WEST, 30.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 23J04~ WEST, 114.43 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 38'1'~ WEST, 162.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 5 DEGREES 36'0901 EAST, 160~95 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 48 DEGREES 58'55" WEST, 66.41 FEET TO A POINT; THENC~ SOUTH 10 DEGREES 49'04Q WEST) 123.62 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 00'00- EAST, 85.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 53 DEGREES 26J21. EAST, 142.60 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 6 DEGREES 51'S1u WESTj 151.05 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 14J14N EAST, 171.Q6 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12'26~ EAST, 122~33 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 43 DEGBEES 03'05'J EAST, SO.OO FEET TO A POINTj THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 36'15~ WESTJ 671.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARC!l IV-C A PORTION OF THE NORTHWCST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 weST, BOISE MERIDIAN! MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTYJ IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESC~IBED AS FOLLOWS~ COMMENCING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 4, 9, iO AND THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38J',. EAST, 2651.19 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER GOMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS SAME WAS REESTABLISHED BY LS 972 (C~ & F INSTRUMENT NO. 7852146, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO); FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 SEARS NORTH 0 DEGRE= 38'27- EAST, 2697.49 FEET; THENCE NORTI-f 0 OEGHE~ 38'27u E..\.ST 22..64 F=ET TO A 5/8" IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55'31n EAT, 1784.61 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 04J29~ EASTJ 303.15 FEET TO THE REAL POINT O~ 8EGINNING; THENCE LEGAL CONTINUED EXHIBIT "A" TO MEMORANDUM OF LEASE AGREEMENT File Number: P183117 PAGE 6 ~ARCEL IV-C (CONT.) NORTH 66 DEGREES 28'4QM WEST: 157.70 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 56 DEGREES 56'39M WESTr 717.37 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 23)44- WESTr 36.12 FEET TO A POINT~ THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 36)28- EAST, 5.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 154.59 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 225.00 FEET) A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39 DEGREES 22'0011) AND A LONG CHORD BEARING NORTH 19 DEGREES 04J4511 WEST, 151.57 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 38 DEGREES 45'4511 WEST, 39.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 51 DEGREES '4J'5~ EAST, "0.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 26 DEGREES 1"31" WEST, 134,78 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 4 DEGHEES 04' 20'1 WEST J 277,45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 46'3511 WEST, 241~56 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 36'56" EAST, 132.59 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NQRTH 89 DEGREES 23'04n WEST, "0.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 36'56- EAST, 30.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 23'04- EAST, 175.94 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 78 DEGREES 05}29- EAST~ 71,13 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 13'16- EAST, 65.34 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 56 DEGREES 28'32- EAST, 79.07 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 53 DEGREES 15'09ft EAST, 86.07 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 31'1811 EAST, 70.53 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 28~22u EAST, 77.08 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 5 DEGREES 49'0611 EAST, 249.89 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 8 DEGREES 16'07" EAST, '25~42 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 56'20" EAST, 266.06 FEET TO A POINTj THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 43'29~ EAST, 283,07 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 61 DEGREES 49)13- EAST, 165.37 FEET TO A POINT~ THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 00/42- WEST: 399.24 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES '8J49- EAST, 398.40 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 02'15. EAST, 61,16 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 60 DEGREES 40'15W EAST, 164.39 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES lQ'18u EAST, 136.30 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 30'15" WEST, 235.93 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 29'4511 WEST, 80.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH i8 DEGREES 33'491J WEST, 182.71 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH " DEGREES 45'15" WESTj 185.77 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 30'15- WEST, 154.10 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 288.86 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 425.00 FtET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38 DEGREES 56'31-, AND A LONG CHORD BEARING SOUTH 63 DEGREES 04'1111 WEST, 283.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCel IV.O A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUAATER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN: MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 4, 9) 10 AND THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE LEGAL CONTINUED EXHIBIT "A" TO MEMORANDUIvl OF LEASE AGREEMENT File Number: P183117 PAGE 7 PARCEL IV-O (CONT.) NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'1,n EAST, 2651.19 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS SAME WAS REESTABLISHED BY LS 972 (C? & F INSTRUMENT NO. i852146, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO); FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 BEARS NORTH 0 DEGREE 38J27- EAST, 2697.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38J27" EAST 22.64 FEET TO A 5/8M IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55'31u EAST, 1614.53 FEET TO THE HEAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 33'50. EAST, 72.37 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 129.52 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF BOO_DO FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12 DEGREES 22'07~, AND A LONG CHORD BEARING SOUTH 56 DEGREES 49'29- EAST, 129.27 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 50 DEGREES 38'25- EAST, 4.33 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 55j31. WEST, 124.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEl. IV-E A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 1 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FalLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 4, 9, 10 AND THE SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'11: EAST, 2651.19 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 3 AND 4 AS SAME WAS REESTABLISHED BY lS 972 (CP & F INSTRUMENT NO. 7852146, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY) IDAHO); FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNEH OF SAID SECTION 3 BEARS NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'27- EAST, 2697~49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREE 38'2711 EAST 22.64 FEET TO A 5/8" IRON PIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 55'31. EAST, 1977~72 FEET TO A S/8t1 IRON PIN AND THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 55'3111 WEST, '09.62 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 11.06 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 249.75 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 DEGREES 32'16G, AND A LONG CHORD 8EJ\RING NORTH 49 DEGREES 22J17U WEST, 11.06 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 50 DEGREES 38125" WEST, 94.32 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 60~45 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 680.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5 DEGREES 05J36-, AND A LONG CHORD BEARING NORTH 53 DEGREES 11'1311 WEST, 60.43 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 30_13 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86 DEGREES 1B'SOn, AND A LONG CHORD BEARING NORTH 12 DEGREES 34'36- WEST1 27.36 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 30 DEGREES 34'5011 EAST, 84.13 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 269.77 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 375.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41 DEGREES 13'0411, AND A LONG CHORD BEARING NORTH 51 DEGREES "'21- EAST, 263.99 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREE 30J15U WEST, 369.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL V LOTS 1 AND 52 IN BLOCK 5~ AND LOT 11 IN BLOCK 9 OF CHERRY LANE VILLAGE NO_ 1 SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PL~T THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 44 OF PLATS AT PAGES 3537 THRU 3538, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTYJ IDAHO. LEGAL CONTINUED EXHIBIT "A" TO MEMORANDUM OF LEASE AGREEMENT File Number: P183"7 PAGE 8 PARCEL 'VI LOTS 12 AND 21 IN BLOCK 9 AND LOT 4 IN BLOCK 11 AND LOT 53 IN BLOCK 5 OF CHERRY LANE VILLAGE NO. 2 SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 46 OF PLATS AT PAGES 3791 AND 3792, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. PAReSl. VII LOT 83 IN BLOCK 5 AND LOT 14, IN BLOCK 13 CHERRY LANE VILLAGE NO. 3 SU8DIVISION ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 58 OF PLATS AT PAGES 5473 THRU 5475, RECOROS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. PARCSL VIII LOT 28 IN BLOCK '1 AND LOT 39 IN BLOCK 13 CHERRY LANE VILLAGe NO. 4 SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 63 OF PLATS AT PAGES 6376 AND 6377, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. PARCEl. IX LOT 9 IN BLOCK 1 OF RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 802 OF ADJUSTED LOT LINES FOR LOTS 8, 9 AND 10, IN BLOCK 1 OF THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 52 OF PLATS AT PAGES 4569 AND 4570, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. PARCEL X LOT 5 IN BLOCK 1 AND LOT 13 IN BLOCK 2, THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO.2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN SOOK 54 OF PLATS AT PAGES 4882 AND 4883, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. PARCEL XI LOT 24 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 3 SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 70 OF PLATS AT PAGES 7167 AND 7168, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, PARCEL XII LOT 19 IN BLOCK 1 AND LOT 46 IN BLOCK 2 OF THE LAKE AT CHERRY LANE NO. 4 SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 74 OF PLATS AT PAGE 7674 AND 7675, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. END OF L!GAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" TO MEMORANDUM OF LEASE AGREEMENT ** TOTRL PRGE.09 ** RESOLUTION NO. 2 1-6 BY: ~&n,/9ndLrJ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERI( TO ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, A "SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES AGREEMENT" WITH SANITARY SERVICE, INC.,TO PROVIDE FOR THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, DATED THE 1 ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1999, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND SANITARY SERVICES, INC., AN IDAHO CORPORATION. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement to provide for solid waste disposal rate changes and the addition of new rates within the City of Meridian with SANITARY SERVICE, INC., an Idaho Corporation, denoted as "SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES AGREEMENT", dated the 1 st day of September; 1999, a copy of which is attached hereto marl(ed as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: I. The Mayor and City ClerIc are hereby authorized to enter into on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain Agreement to provide for solid waste disposal rate changes and the addition of new rates within the City of Meridian with SANITARY SERVICE, INC., an Idaho Corporation, entitled "SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES AGREEMENT", SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND - PAGE IOF 2 THE ADDITION OF NEW RATES RESOLUTION dated the 1 st day of September, 1999, a copy of which is attached hereto marlced as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this /7fi day of /lur--.rl- , 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 1711- day of J9u;us r ,1999. ATTEST: ~ msgZ:\W ork\M\Meridian 153 60M\SW AAC\SolidW asteDisposalRateAddiition.RES SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND - PAGE 20F 2 THE ADDITION OF NEW RATES RESOLUTION (' CERTIFICATE OF CLERI( OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN I, the undersigned, do hereby certify: 1. That I am the duly appointed and elected Clerl( of the City of Meridian, a duly incorporated City operating under the laws of the State of Idaho, with its principal office at 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. 2. That as the City Clerk of this City, I am the custodian of its records and minutes and do hereby certify that on the 17tk day of ~f- , 1999, the following action has been tal(e11 and authorized. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETIING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE NlAYOR AND CITY CLERIC TO ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, A "SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION TO NEW RATES AGREEMENT" WITH SANITARY SERVICE, INC.,TO PROVIDE FOR THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES WITHIN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, DATED THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1999, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND SANITARY SERVICES, INC., AN IDAHO CORPORATION. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE NlAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement to provide for solid waste disposal rate changes and the addition of new rates within the City of Meridian with SANITARY SERVICE, INC., an Idaho Corporation, denoted as "SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES AGREEMENT", dated the 1st day of September, 1999, a copy of which is attached hereto marl(ed as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: CERTIFICATE OF CLERIC OF THE - PAGE 10F 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN 1. The Mayor and City Clerl( are hereby authorized to enter into on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain Agreement to provide for solid waste disposal rate changes and the addition of new rates within the City of Meridian with SANITARY SERVICE, INC., an Idaho Corporation, entitled "SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES AGREEMENT", dated the 1 st day of September, 1999, a copy of which is attached hereto marl(ed as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. STATE OF IDAHO, County of Ada, A On this 31 day of , in the year 1999, before me, ~ 8 tOm s , a Nota Public, appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., 1m or identified to me to be the City Clerl( of the City of Meridian, Idaho, that executed the said instrument, and aclmowledged to me that he executed the same on behal(1)0r\Vf,lJe~~tt'~f Meridian. ~<1t (; ~~ · 81A q#~ ~~ ~ ao$.....e +n. ##~ ~ .0 -. v' ., . . ~ (= :~~OTA~y\ \ .. . . D : * : ~o~ : * = - 0 C." - . . Q ~ e PUBL\. Q = -;. Q>. o(t. ...,: ~ l'> e. .& A.~O ~ ''', ~ "h .....e.. ~"'T .".... ~##'A~ !! I\OLF 1"9 ~~.. TsglZ:\ W~j't~~~i,~'15 3 60M\SW AAOSolidW aste DisposalRateAddCert. Clk ~ ~~J/~ Not Public for Idaho /, Commission Expires: J dIS/,JDO~ CERTIFICATE OF CLERI( OF THE - PAGE 20F 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN ( RECEI\lI~D AUG 1 0 1999 CITY OF MERIDIA1'J interoffice MEMORANDUM To: William G. Berg, Jr. From: R. Stephen Rutherford Subject: SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES Date: August 10, 1999 Will: Pursuant to City Council action tal(en at their August 3, 1999, meeting, please find attached the original requested Resolution, along with the Certificate of Clerl( on the above matter. The Resolution may now be presented on an upcoming City Council agenda for passage. If you have any questions please advise. msg/Z:\ W ork\1V1\Meridian 15360M\SW AAC\Berb081 099 .Mem MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17. 1999 APPLICANT: CONSENT AGENDA AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ~ REQUEST: .RESOLUTION FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY ATTORNEY: r ~ ht)1? o CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: rt~~ IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: BUREAU OF RECLAMA liON: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. s~G j?S ( I II r' Vi \ L1;U . Q) rv~ , J{}f~{. [ fly I ' 1 r€ g t:. r) ~.... '. I FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT % /2~ THIS AGREEl\'IENT entered into and effective the ~ day of JtrtY,( 1999, by and between B. & F. ENTERPRISES, an Idaho general Partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the City of Meridian, an Idaho corporation, hereinafter referred to as Grantee. SECTION 1 RECITALS 1.1 WHEREAS the parties to this Agreement entered into that certain Agreement dated the 22nd day of December, 1995, wherein Grantor granted a permanent Sewer Line Easement and Temporary Construction Easement to Grantee subject to the terms and conditions as set forth therein; that the Sewer Line Easement and Temporary Construction Easement was recorded as instrument number 96008003 records of Ada County Recorder's office and hereinafter for convenience referred to as Agreement; and 1.2 WHEREAS the parties have since learned that a full utility easement will be required for future construction, as a result it is necessary to amend the Agreement to provide for utility easement, particularly domestic waterlines; NOW THEREFORE, based upon the above and foregoing consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties agree as follows: SECTION 2 2.1 That the Agreement by and between the parties dated the 22nd day of December, 1995 be and the same is hereby amended to provide for a general utility easement specifically including sewer and water and related temporary construction easement. 2.2 All other terms and conditions of the Easement Agreement are hereby affirmed. 2.3 However, if a waterline or a sewer line is not constructed in the easement area within two years of the day this Amendment is signed, this Amendment and the Sewer line easement dated the 22nd day of December 1995 will become null and void. FIRST AMENDl\1ENT TO EASEl\1ENT AGREEl\1ENT - 1 (--t p~-l IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties ll.a\re execllted this Agreenlent effective as of tIle date first abo\'e vvrittell. B. & F. ENTERPRlSES By: , G~f\eral Partner I1r DffiA) tt.'fF /A/G-TOIV' CITY 0 F I\JIERlD lAL"J ATTEST: ",\tun II :11/// \\\ f ~,,..... 1/1 ,'\.\.....J 0 i-V'~ !.:.t'?::'t) "1/ " ~ , ",,-I /"... " ~ ~ ............. 'J~.A ~/ ~ (j ~1POF?A" ''-~ ~ ~ ~(j"P ...., rr-... .. ~ ~ ~ '0 ~ , ~ - - = ~ ~ SEAL - ~ ~ 0'- ey/Z:\Work\.\l\'\leridian I 5360M\Public WOrkS\SewerEaSAm;':'Op~' t)~r 1S~ · ,,OJ ~.f! j - /"~a ~l" " ...../ 0 \Y " /1,), UNT'<. \\\" 1IIIIIIHIIlI\\\\\\\ vVillianl G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk Lf FIRST A1\iIENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT - 2 ,-G" j r~ STATE OF IDAHO ) ) 55. County of Ada ) On this tl~L day Of Ltt~vd- 1999, before me, personally appeared ~A , but/V\.- ~/h~ , known or identified to me (or proved tb me on the oath of J,y- InL1'vl (,.,rwvvt-{..if , to be the person whose name is subscribed to the ithin instrument, an acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day ~nd'~~i\r in this certificate first above written. ~", 6#. ..,,,~" ~"E, D. S ~ #####' ~~ '\1\ ......... 1:0... ## !.~ .._ ...T~ .- ... #It".,) . .v .. : 0-" ~ 0 ~ AR, "'-.. .. : tJ: '\"'" ~. : < : ........ : r.n tar Public, State of Idaho SEAL \~ \ PUB\;\C l * ~esiding at ~ / ~~' '-:t "\ <P:... ....'+0 iMy commission expi~es: E::; /, to '", -< ~ ........ ,...~,:t ~.## I'll OF \~ ~,... #" ,,,~ ...... II .,., STATE OF IDAHO ) ) 55. County of Ada ) On this day of & personally appeared .{ . CcVr'l e rr... n wn or identified to me (or proved to me on the th of ~ 0 , to be the person whose name is subsc Ibed to the within inst ment, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ".-, 0 I" '..f ~~" L ..## ~.., ~O~L · S.l ~#~ ~..~ 'r;..~ .......... ~ ~4J~ :- ,,~ .- e. fP ~ lit · ~t:.&I" .. ~ ~ .. ~~b . .- :: ~r \ i . . . - : * . --.~ . * . - . . . ... C.. i. ... PUBL\ : i ~ '<P'}... .. -'0 ~ ~.r'" .. ...~'ll ~ #,~ ~ l' ....... ~ ~~ ~ ~###, ~ 0 F \l> ~~~,... ',.........",' EASEMENT AGREEMENT - Not y Public, S~at!e of Idaho Residing at fY',e-t I a.: ~V\ ri. J My commission expires: I I 51 J()IXJ- RPCET\7~lT-\ P -1.. \; '1"1 i ;j ..- ~~--.J -tJ interoffice MEMORANDUM AUG 1 3 1999 CITY OF MERIDIA~'[ To: William G. Berg, Jr. From: Wm. F. Gigray, III Subject: B. & F. ENTERPRISES, AN IDAHO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP/ FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT / RESOLUTION AND CERTIFICATE OF CLERK / File No. 4.6.11 Date: August 12, 1999 Will: Please find attached the original executed First Amendment To Easement Agreement by B. & F. Enterprises, along 'With the originals of the Resolution and Certificate of Clerk, pertaining to B. & F. Enterprises agreement 'With the City of Meridian. The Agreement 'Will need to be presented to Mayor Corrie to obtain his signature, and, of course, your attestation. Please remember the Agreement 'Will need to be recorded, and then forward a conformed, recorded copy to B. & F. Enterprises, Public Worl(s and the City Attorney office. If you have any questions, please advise. msg\Z:\W ork\M\Meridian 153 60M\Public W orks\ClerkResandCertAgrntBFEnterp,Ltr ,- f MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17. 1999 APPLICANT: DEPARTMENT REPORTS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 221E REQUEST: GARY SMITH - AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH B & F ENTERPRISES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE OEPT: CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: -r~. A III tuff ~ tf ~ lf~ INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( RESOLUTION NO. 24-8 BY: (! h aAfle .A'(9u.-~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERIC TO SIGN AND ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT", BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AND B. & F. ENTERPRISES, AN IDAHO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with B. & F. ENTERPRISES, an Idaho General Partnership, denoted as "FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT", a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: I. The Mayor and ClerIc are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with B. & F. ENTERPRISES, an Idaho General Partnership, entitled "FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT" dated the /7~day of ~.r,f- ,1999, by and between the City of Meridian and B. & F. ENTERPRISES, an Idaho corporation, a copy of which is attached hereto marlced as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH B. & F. ENTERPRISES ( PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, thisL7;;ay of ~f- ,1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this/71J:;: day of /lu?~vf- , 1999. - '-~ ATTEST: J~~~~~ CITY CLERI( ~ , \\\\\\tHflI/II'J \\\\ J'"'\.C '-.RC'",- 1// '\'\\.\.....1 U1 m'-/'l~~"'r, 11/). " ~ "'~- vt:; /Q ~" a /_olWOR-4 I'J.y /~ 2: .;P ~ ~ .::- ~ <:) 1" - ~ - ~ = ~ - .:--.. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH B. & F. ENTERPRISES 2 ( CERTIFICATE 0 F CLERI( OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN I, the undersigned, do hereby certify: I. That I am the duly appointed and elected Clerk of the City of Meridian, a duly incorporated City operating under the laws of the State of Idaho, with its principal office at 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. 2. That as the City Clerk of this ;/;' I am the CU~f its records and minutes and do hereby certify that on the 1.! day of .f , I 999, the following action has been tal<.en and authorized: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERI( TO SIGN AND ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT", BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AND B. & F. ENTERPRISES, AN IDAHO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with B. & F. ENTERPRISES, an Idaho General Partnership, denoted as "FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT", a copy of which is attached hereto marl<.ed as Exhibit "An to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: I. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with B. & F. ENTERPRISES, an Idaho General Partnership, entitled "FIRST AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT CERTIFICATE OF CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN l { AGREEMENT" dated the 171J..day of ~r,f ,1999, by and between the City of Meridian and B. & F. ENTERPRISES, Idaho corporation, a copy of which is attached hereto marlced as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. 5S. STATE OF IDAHO, County of Ada, ) ~thtllli5.l-day of AlA d" in the year 1999, before me, , $ -fV1S , a Notary Public, appeared WILL G. BERG, JR., known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and aclmowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. #r"; ". 111U.,.. ~( .. ~" ""'.l 'i , ~~,,~ c.\\L L. 8l";~##~ ~ b.~ ,....... ..~^ ~ ~ \0'. . V' ~ ~ ..- ... f. ~ . ....,'\OT ~ t..... ~ . . ~ ~.- . . . ~ i tsULjO~ : * i (S G ^ 1;C 0 e. ':. &.(""' [j B 1").. · ~ cJ. e }.J.... ,. <P: .e e- 0 ".. ~ ..?>- -. (l~ A.'\..... ~ ~ .rJ Woee"eQG ~,"r ~~ ##### 1'1] OF \'9 ~~~~~ msg\~~WlnltJrri~~idian 15360 M\Public W orks\BFEnterprisCertofCler kAgm t tJ ~ 'Yl\,o Nota Public for Idaho Commission Expires:_l r) I s/~ OOd-. CERTIFICATE OF CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN 2 RESOLUTION NO 2 4-7 BY: 6/enn l3eh-Tlerj- {/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", DATED THE [1"0 DAY OF ~[.($t- , 1999, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND UNA VISTA, INC. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with LUNA VISTA, INC., denoted as "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", a copy of which is attached hereto marlced as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: 1. The Mayor and ClerIc are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with LUNA VISTA, INC., entitled "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" dated the tz!!'-day of ~'f ,1999, by and between the City of Meridian and Luna Vista, Inc., a copy f which is attached hereto marlced as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terlTIS and conditions. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LUNA VISTA, INC. / TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISION PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this Il/!!day of flarr i-- ,1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this /71!L day of ~q-vr..rl- ,1999. - U ATTEST: \ \14"\ fun 11111 ,\\\\\'~ ~_ . 11111,1' ..,...... "Vi ;r~ ",~ ~ ~ .... A . _o1:J~ .a ~ /fA.... ~ ~ v- ~- -urw,>; ...-". ~ ~ " Jj ~A. ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ 2 i ~ SEAL ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ " "J:} i msg\Z:\Work\M\Meridian 1 5360M\TremontPlace Plat&Rez\R;~~n 7.<s'15~. ~ #' ,.,.....~ ':itJ Cou "'<\. ,- '4,,"- ~ VV " IFll11 NT'! · \\\,'\' Illllu.. ntn\\\ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LUNA VISTA, INC. / TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISION 2 CERTIFICATE OF CLERIC OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN I, the undersigned, do hereby certify: I. That I am the duly appointed and elected Clerl( of the City of Meridian, a duly incorporated City operating under the laws of the State of Idaho, with its principal office at 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. 2. That as the City Clerk of this City, I am the custodian of its records and minutes and do hereby certify that on the 17-a day of ~-I- ,1999, the following action has been tal(en and authorized: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", DATED THEL1~DAY OF )ft~s+- , 1999, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND LUNAVI A, INC. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with LUNA VISTA, INC., denoted as "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", a copy of which is attached hereto mar](ed as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: 1. The Mayor and Clerl( are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with LUNA VISTA, INC., entitled "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT" dated the l?t3day of ~J- , 1999, by and between the City of Meridian and Luna Vista, Inc., a co y of CERTIFICA TE OF CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN 1 j ( which is attached hereto marl<.ed as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. . \\\1""'""'1/' ~'\\ ,...t: ~", _ '~-I V'" "" ~~ A." ;/I, .......'tJ;A'~ (4.. ~ ~v ~.-" ~ :: .". ~ ~ ~ i SEAL s ~ ~ $ ;. ~ '\ 'D i STATE OF IDm&:~.., "'1~' ~.! 11.,.., r\,." ~ " 4I..,~ A. ,....,utJNJ:'l. \\ '\ ~ .'1/. · \\\ . C f Ad JIII{II" tlU'\\ OU11ty 0 a, ) (). On this 11 day of Au~ · , in the year 1999, before me, ~~p ~ , a Notary Public, appeared WILL G. BERG, JR., known or identified to me to be the City ClerIc of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. - - - r 4~~~~~~a3JnS~~~$ ~~. '~.. 1:1 L L. . ('t '::9('.-0;. <:> -S..VV · 1...;' ;~.....~~ ~.., _ \-~ r->e {){)Q 0 .{ , .., J.: r-:;":} 'V _d')~'" 0000 '(J1 "\& 0-..,. ~'ff ::) ~~ f.: /e..) ('. r".f1 A21 ~ \~~ t:. (S~ AW,"11.1i .....t\ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ _l \~ <:~ {) .....:::D 2 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ;g .k & ~ ~ J:'+;< ~ '1 (J 0 : ~ ':1 tlB I... ~ (,jo ;g ~~ <J\ f3$ (> -...;.. fff > \7~\j:!rvOLls\M\M~4~~~ 5369 M\ T rem 0 n tP lace Pia t&Rez\Certifi ca ti 0 n CI er kfor RES "h~ ./ P .,-"r'a 1'\)" ~'&'U ': - ~t?i.1' ~;_ ~..... 1. j.. " .., 'i,'G 1v~ _ "':.; ~t:&'~t2'lr~~bll>f;> . :1 , -:. '-.-.t '.. ;.!'- cI~ Nota Public for Idaho lJ Commission Expires: / f!;Sj OlJ Q ~~l CERTIFICATE OF CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 8.37 BY COUNCIL MEMBER: (I.. ~.fr~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING SUBSECTION A 1. OF SECTION 4 OF CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE I MERIDIAN CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE MAYORS SALARY TO $1,667.00 PER MONTH AND DELETING ANY PROVISION FOR SEPARATE SALARY FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Subsection A 1. of Section 4 of Chapter 8 of Title 1 Meridian City Code be alnended and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-8-4: SALARIES: A. Elective Officers: I. Mayor: The salary of the Mayor shall be one thousand t'""yyy'"O hundred dollars ($1,200.00) one thousand six hundred sixty- seven dollars ($1,667.00) per month, payable monthly. 2. Council: The salary of each member of the Council shall be five hundred dollars ($500.00) dollars per month, payable monthly. 3. Coul~lcil President. The salal:)Y of the president of the Council, yy\,vhen actil'lg ill the capacity of 1\,1ay~or, shall be the S3.11'le as the :L\1ayyor, payVable ll10nthlyV prorated for the period of tin1c he shall pcrforlTl the duties of !\1ayor. SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - 1 I r amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elilnination herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance tal(es effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect January 1, 2000, after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 178 day of /Ju~.~~F{- ,1999. APPROVED B');I~'.~AYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this /7-1i:- day of . - C ,1999. ATTEST: :\,,\11" fl" ,v, ~ S" .~'\\;. -' VI. I,.... "t.:\; ~"' "-} ," O:~h ~+ % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ a SEAL ~ ~ - ! ~ & 2 .. ~- ,'5 ~ ~ "0 '~r lS~ · .p .! 1-~ 'AI Cot, ..n tr: ,.....' '.i; " Vi-' " Il';'I m, t \\\" J11111111 nu\\\\\ msgjZ:\ W ork\M\Meridian 153 60N1\Ordinances\CITY GOVERNMENT ORD I NANCE S\Mayo r SalaryOrd0630 9 9 ~~ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - 2 interoffice MEMORANDUM ll~ ~ 0 rf-I' ~ n:;i'T\ l ~ ~ J - .. . -'- 1-' ~l - . ~ L '61-~~ ---4 -tJi To: William G. Berg, Jr. / Wm. F. Gigray, III ;/ff/:1 ORDINANCE NO. 837 COMPENSATION FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL AU6 2 0 1999 CITY OF l\'lERIDLA1~ From: Subject: Date: August 19, 1999 Will: As a result of the City Council's action on the 17th, I have prepared the final draft of the Ordinance in accordance 'With their action, which is enclosed 'With this memo. Please obtain the necessary signatures and publish. If you need further assistance in this matter please advise. msg/Z:\ W ork\M\Meridian 15360M\Mayor and Council\BergOrd83 7 Salaries.Mem (rc ~ srr~ " II t ~ ~ Cl../ .!J1 ' r- tJ~ _ IJA La/A,,; ", rfl~ , (j-{AJ/"-) ---Iv- iAfJ L 11/ ~ - f;t-v 0 IY/- , '- CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 8;8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING SUBSECTION B OF SECTION 3 CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 10 MERIDIAN CITY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND INCORPORATED AREAS WHICH MAP IS DENOTED AS "FIRM COMMUNITY PANEL #1600ICOOOO OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ITS INCORPORATED AREAS EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 22, 1999", AND ANY SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY; IDAHO: SECTION 1: That _subsection B of section 3 Chapter 6 of Title 10 Meridian City Code be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Basis For Establishing Areas Of Special Flood Hazard: The areas of special hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled ~ Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the City of :L\1eridian", cOluplctcd il"L i\ugust of 1989, YvYvith accompanying Flood Insurance !\1aps completed ScptcITlbcr 27, 1991, arc hereby adopted b)y referefice 3.I..d declared to be it part of this Chapter. and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for Ada County. Idaho. and incorporated areas entitled "FIRM Community Panel # 1600 1 CODOO of Ada County. Idaho. and its incorporated areas effective September 22. 1999" is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this Chapter together with any subsequent revisions thereof. The Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) are on file in the office of the City ClerIc. SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. CITY OF MERIDIAN FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE - PAGE 1 ( SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elilnination herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: DATE OF EFFECT: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect within one (I) month after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 17~ dayof ~t- ,1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this / 7M . dayof ~t- ,1999. ATTEST: JI~~~fb- City ClerIc msg/Z:\ W ork\M\Meridian 15360 M\Fema \FloodDamagePreventOrd CITY OF MERIDIAN FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE - PAGE 2 ( ** TX CONFIRMAI~JN REPORT ** ( AS OF SEP 21 'SJ 15:52 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS 24 09/21 15:51 4 EC--S 00'52" 00:_____~:~____~~_________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ ~1J,yol' ROBERT O. CORRlE , · 'oJ I.J \J, . I H.....,..J V t\..:. \I,; L..t...e r C L'unC:' \fr"'T'b A Good Place co Live CITY OF MERIDIAN LEG,.\,L DEP."'RT~'E~T (:O~) ~::1J....(~(jJ. CHARLE.S ROUNTREE CLE!'iN 8 E\l11..EY RON Ai.....DERSON KEITH BfRD 33 EAST IDAHO l\-[ERID L-\N,. IDAHO 8J~2 Phon~ (:!.08) 388-433 · F:l.'( (208) S 87 ~3 t 3 PUBLiC WORKS BUlLolNC DEP,~RT;""IE;'iT (~08) ~:!7-:~ It PLA.NNtNG :\NO ZONING DEPART:-"E~T (~OS) S3.!.S53] FACSIMILE COVER SHEET FAX NUMBER: (l/ZS) Lf87- 4(0/3 TO: PA-Tl'J"a. 8A-~ ~b-~ TlTLE/D EPARTM ENT: r:b+1I':' DATE: ~21!qq CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO X, TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 FROM: CITY' OF MERIDIAN FAX NUMBER: (208) 888-4218 NAME:.~ c\" I (Yt<; TITLE/DEPARTMENT: (' ~ VA II ~ 6/jj r Q COMMENTS: l=tN'D ~ PetSvF;illu~~ DWINA+...rI; _ ~ ~-xn ~~!o...J ~ l).S t-A4;L4 PLEASE CALL US IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY (208) 888-4433. ~f .lyor ROBERT D. CORRCE ( rt U bur f t<l:_.4,SU RE Y.4LLEY A. Good PI~ce to Live (.-- CITY OF MERIlJIAN LEGAL DEPART~IE;"\jT (:O~) ~8J.~..J.26J. CI"'Iunc;I \f~m~~ CHARLES ROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITH 8 fRD 33 E4-\ST IDAHO i\'IERIDL.\N, IDAHO 83~2 Phone (208) 388-~J3 · Fax (208) 887-481 J PUBLIC \VORKS BUILO(NG DEPART;YIENT (~08) 387 <!211 PLANNING AND ZON[NG DEPART~(ENT (208) 33J..553J FACSIMILE COVER SHEET FAX NUMBER: (42$)'-187- 40/3 TO: P A-IfJ'U:: 8 A ~ 1\&\J TITLE/DEPARTMENT: r::,p;1-1B DATE: qfzlfqq NO~ CONFIDENTIAL: YES TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 FROM: CITY OF MERIDIAN FAX NUMBER: (208) 888-4218 NAME: ~ C~.I (YL<) . TITLE/DEPARTMENT: (~~L1l:S 11JrQ COMMENTS:J=CCfi) ~. PI26V8..S\(~ Dt.OIN~)Cg. _ ~ ~xn ~ -tfld.-0 b'B' L)S "-"4 iL · PLEASE CALL US IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY (208) 888-4433. ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17 y 1999 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ~ APPLICANT: REQUEST: FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING OEPT: CITY WATER OEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: COMMENTS SEe ATTACHED ORDINANCE 1- ~~ 1J liP arr IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 3. 1999 APPLICANT: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: -1L REQUEST: FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: SEE ATTACHED ORDINANCE CITY POLICE OEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER OEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGA liON: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. JUSTIN P. AYLSWORTH JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GIORAY, III D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WILLIAM A. MORROW CHRISTOPHER S. NVE PHILIP A. PETERSON STEPHEN L. PRuss ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN R. STEPHEN RUTHERFORD TERRENCE R. WHITE WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680..1150 TEL (208) 288~2499 FAX (Z08) Z88~Z501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653~0247 TEL (208) 466~9272 FAX (208) 466~4405 Email viaInternet@wfg@wppmg.com PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE July 16, 1999 I ~~_/,t William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerl( 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 J U L 1 6 1999 Cr~r r11~1 -' -1 11. '\.J Re: FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE FILE NO.: 4.7 Dear Will: Please find enclosed an original and a copy of a proposed ordinance for the adoption of the new Flood I11surance Rate Map denoted as "FIRM COlnmunity Panel # 1600 I COOOOn, and incorporated areas effective September 22 ,1 999. This Ordinance has bee11 reviewed by Cheryl Sable and is approved for submission to the City Council. Once this ordinance is passed please send a certified copy to FEMA and when relying refer to 19P-N, and the Regional Office address is: Enclosures cc: Mayor Robert D. Corrie Cheryl Sable, Public W orl(s m ~) ffl-44-B'J (41.5) ljCf1-l./l/l1P FAX: '1~7-4lRl ~ A rr N ~ 71'r[ 11 ASSb'1 , Co f(. ------------ If FEMA Mitigation Division Federal Regional Center 130 228th Street SW Bothell, Washington 98021-9796. If you have any questions please advise. msgJZ:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\FEMA\Berg071699.Mem interoffice MEMORANDUM To: Gary Smith, Public Works Director Cheryl Sable, Public Works Mayor Robert D. Corrie /;/h William G. Berg, Jf., City ~U VT Wm. F. Gigray, III (J IlJ l 1 5 1999 7-(~-q1 ~~ J; ~cL CITY OF MERIDIAN FLOOD DAMA( u: ~~ ~':? /) ~ 7~/b-ef 't &u'G. WI)I61 ~. I received a memo from Cheryl ~ (~~ 3 J2.-...z _?) .h.<e- the above referenced matter advising that t11ere 1;:, a ""--_ ..- months to adopt the updated Flood Insura11ce Study (FIS) and r UJVu. -- Map(s) (FIR1v1) for Ada County, Idaho, and incorporated areas entitled "FIR1v1 Community Panel # 1600 1 COOOO of Ada County, Idaho, and its incorporated areas effective Septelnber 22, 1999". I have reviewed Cheryl's n1emo, and the acco111panying letters fr0111 the Federal En1ergency Managell1ent Agency, and City Ordina11ce No. 564, which was passed in 1991 and IGloWl1 as the "Flood Dalnage Prevention Ordinance", which will be codified in the ne'Vv City Code at Chapter 6 of Title 10. From: Subject: File No.: 4.7 Date: July 13, 1999 Gary, Cheryl, Mayor Corrie and "' In revievving the request, I have prepared the enclosed DRAFT ordinance for your review. Please review t11is DRAFT ordi11ance for any needed changes, a11d if you need to Sllpply it to the Federal Elnergency Ma11agen1ent Agency for their review please do that also. I await YOtlY response. n1sglZ:\Work\tv1\I'vleridian 15360M\FEMA\GaryCheryIMayorBerg071299.Mem ( CITY OF MERIDIAN tJ,.. ft:;; i.,. F-" ,.lA' ,. ;" /3 ' -77 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING SUBSECTION B OF SECTION 3 CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 10 MERIDIAN CITY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND INCORPORATED AREAS WHICH MAP IS DENOTED AS "FIRM COMMUNITY PANEL #1600ICOOOO OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND ITS INCORPORATED AREAS EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 22,1999", AND ANY SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE Iv1AYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY; IDAHO: SECTION I: That subsection B of section 3 Chapter 6 of Title 10 Meridian City Code be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Basis For Establishing Areas Of Special Flood Hazard: The areas of special hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report entitled ~ Flood Insurance Study (FrS) for t11c Cit)~ of ?\1eridiall", C011lplctcd iri j\ugust of 1989, "y~yith acco11Lpany"irLg flood Insuraricc !\1aps conlplcted Scptell"'Lbcr 27, 1 991, arc hcrcb)" adopted by'" rCferefi.CC ali.d declared to be a part of this Cli.aptcr. and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIR1v1) for Ada County, Idaho, and incorporated areas entitled "FIRlvl COlnmul1ity Panel # 1600 1 COGaO of Ada County, Idaho, and its incorporated areas effective September 22, 1999" is hereby adopted by reference al1d declared to be a part of this Chapter together "With any subsequent revisions thereof. The Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) are on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 2: All ordinances, resollltions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herevvith are hereby repealed, rescinded and a11nulled. CITY OF MERIDIAN FLOOD DAtvlAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE - PAGE 1 SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herei11 be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any portion as n1ay be declared invalid. SECTION 4: DATE OF EFFECT: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect within one (1) month after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. APPROVED BY THE IvIAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. Mayor Robert D. Corrie ATTEST: Ci ty Clerl( msglZ:\ W ork\IY1\Meri di an 15360 M\FElv1A \Fl oodDamagePreven tOrd CITY OF MERIDIAN FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION ORDINANCE - PAGE 2 ( ** TX CONFIRMA1i~N REPORT ** ( AS OF AUG 23 '~ 15:50 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 20 08/23 15:49 208 888 1097 MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC--S 01'00" 002 112 OK CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. &;8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING SUBSECTION B OF SECTION 3 CHAPTER 6 OF TITLE 10 MERIDIAN CITY CODE BY PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE NEW FLOOD INSURANCE RATE tv1AP FOR ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, AND INCORPORATED AREAS WHICH MAP IS DENOTED AS "FIRM COMMUNITY PANEL #1600ICOOOO OF .ADA COUNTY', IDAHO, AND ITS INCORPORATED AREAS EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 22, 1999", AND ANY SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS THEREOF; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERlDIAN, ADA COUNTY; IDAHO: SEC1"10N 1: That subsection B of section 3 Chapter 6 of Title 10 Meridian City Code be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Basis For Establishing Areas Of Special Flood Hazard: The areas of special hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in a scientific and engineering report cl"ititlcd ~ Flood Inslrrance Study (FIS) for the City of ~{clidiar~n, cornplctcd in :1.ugust of 1 989, -....vith accompanying flood Insurali.CC Maps COlli-pIeted Scptclnbcr 27, 1991, arc hereby adDpted by IcrcrtnCc and declared to be 3. part of this Chapter. and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIR1v1) for Ada County. Idaho. and incorporated areas entitled <<FIRM Community Panel # 16001 CODOO of Ada County ~ Idaho~ and its incorporated areas effective September 22~ 199911 is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of tins Chapter together with any subsequent revisions thereof. The Flood Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Map(s) are on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions) orders or parts thereof ill conflict herevvith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. CITY OF MERIDIAN FLOOD DAIvlt\GE l)l\EVENTION ORDINANCE - PAGE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. g ;3 Y AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN REPEALING SECTIONS 2 AND 3 OF ORDINANCE NO. 765; AND PROVIDING FORA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE REAL PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF ORDINANCE NO. 765; AND PROVIDING FORAN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That Sections 2 and 3 of Ordinance No. 765 of the City of Meridian, be, and the same are hereby repealed. SECTION 2. That the real property described in Section 1 of Ordinance No. 765 of the City of Meridian is, and the same is hereby subject to and governed by the terms and conditions of that certain Development Agreement dated the 17th day of August, 1 999, by and between the City of Meridian and Michael Homan, Preside11t of Luna Vista, Inc., recorded as Instrument No. qCfD~3D~d ,records of the Ada County Recorder's Office. SECTION 3. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. . "NT)' RECOROER AQ~j.~~\rtO NAV~RRO ~Q\~E', -\O~\iO TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISIONJQ99 ~U 25 M~ 9: 51 (LUNA VISTA, INC.) ORDINANCE - 1 ."'-.:' 'UESl Or RtCORa~Ri~~" v.1' IL- otP\J1'( FE.E~ 0'Ir99084 5 \ (' SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect frOITI and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this /71'5 day of /lu-jus f- , 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this f7IP- day of ~s f- , 1999. STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada. ) On this I B day of ~l , 1999, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said S e, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., knovvn to me to be the Mayor and City ClerIc of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, al1d who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official\l~flJs,~he day and year first above written. 3ol0" II,,, ~ ~l,~~ ~L L. Sl ###~ { ,:.,;..:-.0 ........ ~~ #" W ~ ~ ~"Y"'.OI .0 V' ~ \. !(ST:"~l(I\'fA1?r.\ '\ NO Y PUBLIC FO~IDAHO :: r ~ .: f\Ile.t I ~ * : _.- : * i RESIDING AT: I ''<&I' S i ~. PUB\J'-C; i MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Id51 LJ)I .;. .o~ 0--- ~ . ^ .. .0 ~ -, ':;A:.-. · ~ ~ ~Jl ~~ft~~"li~' 5360 M\T remontPlace Plat&Rez\RZtwoLuna Vista Ordinance ~### 1] OF 1: ".,... '."'.e...111'''''' TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISION (LUNA VISTA, INC.) ORDINANCE - 2 ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999- 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROLL CALL: ~RON ANDERSON )( CHARLIE ROUNTREE :=X=GLENN BENTLEY ~KEITH BIRD X MAYOR ROBERT CORRIE I CONSENT AGENDA A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING HELD AUGUST 3, 1999: ~v<- B. RESOLUTION # '2 4- G -- SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL RATE CHANGES AND ADDITION OF NEW RATES: ~(/'.e-- C. MEMORANDUM - CHERRY LANE GOLF COURSE LEASE AGREEMENT: ~~ D. PROPERTY EXCHANGE LOT 8 & 9 BLOCK 1 OF THE LAKES AT CHERRY LANE: ~ ~ ~-f. pi sp ~ REGULAR AGENDA 1. ORDINANCE # - FULL TIME MAYOR: 2. ORDINANCE # t? J 1 -- MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 'A SALARIES: ~Jr.L tf-/ ~ ~ 7. <701 ftt-O~ - fv.-lir ddcC C::~;;q.f7V APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZON~G COMMISSIO];ERS: tl-'f7IJ'Y&7 v.L I~etd /;}-rw W A- r /2-t?-/uzrz.c( l{ ~ TABLED 8/3/99: FINAL PLAT FOR MAWS NO.3 SUBDIVISION (7 BUILDING LOTS) BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING-NORTH OF PINE & WEST OF LOCUST GROVE ,RD: Ln J.? ~ ;ha ~ -f?l /?ee.. ~ 7 L J<ZjJ 7 .. 1 Z- ~ r TABLED 8/3/99: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WILKINS RANCH SUBDIVISION (89 BUILDING LOTS ON 27.86 ACRES) BY STEINER DEVELOPMENT LLC - SOUTH OF USTICK & WEST OF TEN MILE: lZ-f'P"Jif e-, TABLED 8/3/99: ORDINANCE # g 3 B - FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION: wrprov~ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. ( { 13. ORDINANCE # ~ -- ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 6.15 ACRES (FOR R-40 ZONING) FOR PROPOSED COBBLESTONE VILLAGE BY IONIC ENTERPRISES, INC.-SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOCUST GROVE & FRANKLIN: ~ ~{? ~t: 7 n I~ DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TREMONT SUBDIVISION BY LUNA VISTA, INC. BROADWAY & STH STREET (725 W. STH): ~V~ ORDINANCE # f} 3 q -- REZONE OF 9.838 ACRES FROM R-S WITH CONDITIONS FOR TOWNHOUSES TO R-8 WITHOUT CONDITIONS FOR PROPOSED TREMONT PLACE SUBDIVISION BY LUNA VISTA, INC.- BROADWAY & 8TH STREET (725 W. 8TH) ~/7Jcr..e..- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION & ZONING OF 4.6 ACRES BY TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH I K. D. ROOFING-NORTH OF OVERLAND RD, SOUTH OF 1-84 & EAST OF TEARE AVE: Cli;t~fo ~p~p!H elL- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CHURCH PARKING, RECREATIONAL USES AND CONTRACTOR'S BUSINESS BY TREASURE VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH I K. D. ROOFING-NORTH OF OVERLAND RO, SOUTH OF 1-84 & EAST OF TEARE AVE: 00' C-7v'~ ;:..0 ,/J-"~-/~~ ~1~1 ckpJ';; 7~ft<-~ PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR USE OF EXISTING BUILDING FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL-BY CAPITAL CHRISTIAN CENTER-NORTH OF FAIRVIEW & WEST OF EAGLE ROAD. ?11--z4 p...~ fo ~/CM-tZ- /I? .{ elt PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR FINAL PLAT OF PACKARD NO.1, PHASE 2 BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING - NORTH OF FAIRVIEW AND WE. ~T OF EAGLE ROAD: UN ~~ .p jt1-4tpt7~ r(;:-' (YvlL PUBLICYHEARING: 'REQ(JESt FOR VARIANCE FOR PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION IN MAWS NO.3 SUBDIVISION BY TEALEY'S LAND SURVEYING - NORTH OF PINE AND WEST OF ADKINS AVENUE: {!;~~ .k; ~p~oA-t- -P/?( c/l- PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 2.0 ACRES OF LAND FOR OFFICE USE (I-L ZONING) FOR JACKSON'S FOOD STORES-NORTH OF FRANKLIN ROAD & EAST OF EAGLE ROAD. Ct'/11 p~ ,tP~/'~ ..rIFI ell.. PUBLIC1-lEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PUD TO ALLOW OFFICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ON ADJOINING SITE FOR JACKSON'S FOOD STORES-NORTH OF FRANKLIN ROAD & EAST OF EAGLE ROAD. . ~ c;J.y tv~h fhLfJcv..e .,c/p fel{ I ,{ez.t'dWrV/J7 ~ PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PARTIAL EASEMENT V ACA rlON IN 14. 15~ 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2 2-. ~ Z3~ ?If ( ( ENGLEWOOD CREEK NO.2 SUBDIVISION BY BRIAN LEE CONSTRUCTION - LOT 17. BLOCK 6. C(~ a-~cf Iv ~j'/c~ trl--~ ~ ~prv~ PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.77 ACRES (FOR CG ZONING) OF LAND FOR PROPOSED EAGLE ROAD PROFESSIONAL CENTER BY FERMOR, LLC- NORTH OF 1-84 & WEST OF EAGLE ROAD, ~ST OF ALLEN STREET. cl).y a~~ -fo ~p~ PI ~ f c/~ PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THRU FOR MOXIE JAVA BY AVIt L.L.C.-1800 N LOCUST GROVE RD: (Jilt ~1/lnne1.p ~~ /yp I c/R PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INCLUDES SIGNAGE FOR CHEVRON C-STORE WITH GAS PUMPS & DETACHED CAR WASH, MCDONALD'S WITH DRIVE-UP WINDOW (SAME BUILDING AS C- STORE) & IDAHO UNITED CREDIT UNION BY EAGLE PARTNER8-NW CORNER EAGLE ROAD & MAGIC VIE~ D'5 I e / t'1. a Itn n.c-:f /-0 ;:ru-f7~ -/i.j: ::t & ~ WATER I SEWER I TRASH DELINQUENCIES: t:U; I~~ /1-a y JL-; DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 1. GARY SMITH: A. CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR WELL NO. 18 PUMP AND PUMPHOUSE: a~v ~ frl-Ylfh:!€f- ~S'.fr-u-ch~ B. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION - WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS: ~t9V'~ IJ-It/~a!el1-- &nwlrl<.dl~ C. CONTRACT MODI FICA TtON - USTICK RESERVOIR & BOOSTER PUMP STATION: ~A/;/(lllL eChSiradJ~ a..,,tJ? rtJV'.e- D. BID RESULTS I AWARD 1999 WATERLINE PROJECT PHASE 1 OVERLAND ROAD TO EAGLE ROAD: J-,' i{ a PP n)V.t:- /Jyllevn. (}.nJ' /nr.-cll 'en-) 15.2/ 51.6. 2. 5 E. AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH B & F ENTERPRISES: qpl;9v..e-, 2. KENNY BOWERS: A. B. COLLECTIVE LABOR AGREEMENT WITH UNION #2311: /1-V av-~~ LINE ITEM ADJUS-rMENTS: ~~ Z l. ,PI 11- ytvL;~c.e j2.ef{l/<RJf- Ief--l3ack.-/Ze~t>>- 69 Ge/1...LIL/~,f/fAa~ ( ~s: ~m CJ)m 1l1-1 \J- ~z <:G) --I ~~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~I )::. 0 tJ ;0 m CfJ ( ~ -:1 ~ r- ~ "" ~ ~ J ~ o <: rn c ~ ;gm o ~~ ~ ~ 'J l ~ ~ o ~~ &1~ ~~ -c c to r- -0 0- ffi~ )>0 ~." ~s (f)m -;0 G>_ zc I _ Z)> (J) Z . :I: m m --I 0 ~ '?:j ~ l> 0 c ~ ~ G"') C1 ~ ~ trj t:~ -....J L~ ~ ~ -... ~ <.0 0 c..c ~ c.o ~ /~1 ~( .~-=' . 0 ~} ~, ~ 2t-. ~ t ~ ~ \ . ':r) 0-- ~ ~ ~ ~ , -;1 4- r ~ "-, \ 'f ~ -....,~.-....... ~~ 1'"\., "- ....' "" fL: ~ ~ ~ r~ ~-....... ~ "" ~ ') ~ tJ ~ ~ S '--\ . ~ f' L ~ \ ~ \".\ . s-- ~ ~ ^' ..1' n ~' ~ t\) t\.; ~ ~ ~ ~ ) o (' ~~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Q. <-r. 0- ~ o :g~ 2CS ~~ ~s: ~m Cl>m 1'11-1 ,,- a!Z <:G) --I ~ :c~ 111 :r:.. tJ tJ ~ en ~ o ~ c ~ ~m o ffi~ o~ --t~ , ~ ~ ." c: OJ r- -0 0_ ffi~ >0 22." Z Q3: (f)m -:;0 Q- zc I _ z)> (f)Z :J: m m -I ~ ~ l> ";d o c= \..:tj ~ Ci) (1 ~::; tzj eE cD ;:;l o~~ 2; 14 z ~v MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17.1999 APPLICANT: REQUEST: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SALARIES AGENCY COMMENTS ( AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ~ CITY CLERK: SEE ATTACHED MINUTES & ORDINANCE CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE OEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: t ~1; 1 IJ.J./ utle re I yvJJ I 01 Jwvi J r}( l 0 r SJ ~ ~ INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMA liON: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY COUNCIL MEMBER: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING SUBSECTION A 1. OF SECTION 4 OF CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 1 MERIDIAN CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE MAYORS SALARY TO ($ ) PER MONTH, PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO ($ ) PER MONTH, AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ($ ) PER MONTH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Subsection A 1., A 2. and A 3. of Section 4 of Chapter 8 of Title 1 Meridian City Code be amended and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-8-4: SALARIES: A. Elective Officers: 1. Mayor: The salary of the Mayor shall be one thousand t""""Y,,"(o hundred dollars ($1,200.00) dollars L$ ) per month, payable monthly. 2. Council: The salary of each member of the Council shall be five hundred dollars ($500.00) dollars L$ ) per month, payable monthly. 3. Council President: The salary of the president of the Council, when acting in the capacity of Mayor, shall be the saIne as the !\1ayyor, L$ ) per month~ payable monthly. prorated for the period of tirrie he shall perform the duties of I\1ayor. ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - 1 ( ( SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herevvith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridia11 City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any portion as may be declared i11valid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance tal(es effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect January I, 2000, after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE ATTEST: CITY CLERIC msglZ:\ W ork\M\Meridian 15360M\Ordinances\CITY GOVERNMENT ORDINANCES\MayorSalaryOrd063099 ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - 2 ( ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 3. 1999 APPLICANT: AGENCY ITEM NUMBER: -L- REQUEST ORDINANCE ON SALARIES AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: SEE ATTACHED ORDINANCE CITY FIRE OEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: -(Mlt 16 g-1/7 CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( interoffice MEMORANDUM RE C' --: E I-V----t;-"'-.-; 1\,', i _~- , J H ..1.-.. t I J U L J 0 199~~ S : _t :/- ,~, :' ~\ ~ "':-: J i :J ~1 C i t Y f':. 1 e !:' k '_J f r ice To: William G. Berg, Jr. cc: Mayor Robert D. Corrie Councihnan Anderson Councilman Bentley Councilman Bird Councihnan Rountree From: Wm. F. Gigray, ill ~o<" Subject: ORDINANCE ON SALARlES Date: July 28, 1999 Will: At the request of the Mayor, I have prepared a revised ordinance pertaining to the Mayor's and Council's salary, for City Council consideration of the revised proposed ordinance. This ordinance establishes new salaries for the Mayor, President of the Council and Council members. Please note I have not filled in any amounts, but left those areas blank. I have been advised that the Council will have discussion on the salaries at a City Council meeting. If you have any questions please advise. msgjZ:\ W ork\M\Meridian 15360M\Mayor and Council\ClerkO 72899SalariesOrd.Mem ( interoffice MEMORANDUM F,ECElVED AUG 0 3 1999 City of 1\1eridian Citv Clerk uffice ~:f:f: ~ To: William G. Berg, Jr., Clerk's Office From: Marlene 81. Ge Subject: ORDlliANCEON SALARlliS Date: August 3, 1999 Will: At the request of the Mayor, I have prepared a revised ordinance pertaining to the Mayor's and Council's salary, for City Council consideration of the revised proposed ordinance. This ordinance establishes new salaries for the Mayor, President of the Council and Council members. Please note I have not filled in any amounts, but left those areas blanl(. I have been advised that the Council will have discussion on the salaries at a City Council meeting. Additionally, today please note a new revision to the ordinance on page 1 at number 3, the words "when acting in the capacity of Mayor" have been stricl(en through. This new revised ordinance needs to replace the previous ordinance sent down on July 29th. If you have any questions please advise. msg/Z:\ W o rk\M\Meridian 15360 Iv1\Mayor and Council\Clerk0803 99 SalariesOrd. Mem ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY COUNCIL MEMBER: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING SUBSECTION A 1. OF SECTION 4 OF CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 1 MERIDIAN CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE MAYORS SALARY TO ($ ) PER MONTH, PRESIpENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO ($ ) PER MONTH, AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ($ ) PER MONTH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Subsection A I., A 2. and A 3. of Section 4 of Chapter 8 of Title I Meridian City Code be amended and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-8-4: SALARIES: A. Elective Officers: 1. Mayor: The salary of the Mayor shall be one thousari.d t,..vv~O hUl..dred dollars ($1,200.00) dollars ($ ) per month, payable monthly. 2. Council: The salary of each member of the Council shall be five hundred dollars ($500.00) dollars ($ ) per month, payable Inonthly. 3. Council President: The salary of the president of the Council, "'v"'v~hel.. acting in the capacity'" of 1\1ayor, shall be the saIne as the 1\1ay"'or, L$ ) per month~ payable lTIonthly. prorated for the period of time he shall perform the duties of I\1ayor. ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - 1 ( SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof i11 conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance tal(es effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect January 1,2000, after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE ATTEST: CITY CLERIC msglZ:\ W ork\M\Meridian 15360M\Ordinances\CITY GOVERNMENT ORDINANCES\MayorSalaryOrd063099 ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - 2 P ~_::::;:I --...., P...02 ( CITY 01--. MEI{JDlAN RECEIVED AUG 0 3 1qqq ORDINANCE NO. C}ty of Zl/feridiarJ CIty Clerk ()ffjce ~J:! ;L .BY COUNCIL MEMBER: AN ORDINANCE 01-= THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING SUBSECTION ^ 1. OF SECTION 4 Ot-: CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE I MERIDL\N (:JTY r:O[)E TO lNClt~:ASE ~I\HI: MAYOltS SALAlty ~f\O ($ ) PER MONTH, PRESIDENT Ot-: THE CITY COUNCIL TO ($ ) PER MONTH, AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ($ ) PER MONTH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE J )A'r~:. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Crl~Y Of MEltIL)lAN~ IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Subsection A 1., A 2. and A 3. of Section 4 of Chapter 8 of 'J'itJe 1 Meridian City Cock be .Hllcnclcd and the same is herehy :lmended to read as l()I1ows: 1-8-4: SAIAI~ ) ":S: A~ Elective Officers: I · M,tyor: 'l"he salary uf tIle Ma}'or Sh:1JI b~ O"LC tJ'LOl1.~and,.tVtft) 11uIldrt.:d dulli.lL3 ($1 )20().OO) d()JJar,q LS ) per month, payable monthly. 2. C:()llnci]: ~l~rle ~alary of each Incm]1cr (}f tlle Cutn,eil sh;i.ll ])c five 11tll1{lrctl clollar~ ($5(){)'()O) dollars ( $ ) per momh, payable mOllt h Iy . :~. (:()uncill)resid~llt: Tl1C salal)T of tIle IJrt~si(ieI)l. of lhe C:Oll)lciL yVI-~trl i1CtiI\~ in lliC: ca11acit)'.. of ry1a)~or., shalll)e tIle ~~ar'I)r as-the M::!yOf; ($ ) }J~r H\()11!.th payable l1)()nlhly. I)roratc(! for t.llc }1criuu of t in1C 11c 311alJ pcrforfft"'i:'he fh-tt ic~ <)f !\..ia yp()r. Ol~l)I NANC:E MAYOR'S SALA]~Y - 1 AUG 03 '99 09:18 PAGF_Vl? P...03 ( SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolw iom, order~ or pans lhereof in confliCT hC'rc:\-vi t J\ a r<:- hereby' re.pcalcd, rcsci nded a 1 \d al\I1Ulled. SECTION 3: V ALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any scction, para&'Taph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any r(':~son to be illvalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council th3t it would have J.>a~sed all other portions of this Ordinance independenl of thl' e!imin;'ltion herefrOHl of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance docs not affcct an acti()rl ()r l)r()ceedi11g c()mlnenced or rigl1L accrued hc[()rc (his ()rdinal1cc take!i effecl. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect Janwuy 1, 20()(), aher its passage, approval and publication, according to I~w. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, lhis day of J 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF TIIE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of J I 999. MAYOR RC)BERI- D, (~O](RI1~ ^'l~ J'ES' J.: CI'J'Y (~I,ERI( I'I'I'1!I'/:\ W ork\M\Mcr Idi;1 I I I) '1()O "'1\( )rdin.ant..'c::;\crTY ( ~()V I.,I\N IVtl~(\jT ()R n 1 i\:^\:( :l~S\j\'1..~yn1'5;llal y( )r<.!()(} .~O!)i) Ol\l)] NA:\JCE Ml\ Y()R'S SAI..^RY - L AUG 03 '99 09:18 PAGE.0~ P..Ol ( WHITE" P~TE:tSON, PRL1SS~ MORROW & GLGRAY, p_~-\. ; l)r.TI:"\l P. .-\ Yt.,S \II ClJi' nt j 1.:1.1 E. KLt 1;'11 F I SC""rlE R '1.'.... .=. ',3, ca." y, II I D. ':;sAMUEl. JOHNSON 'Xo"1 WA ""' ,<\ ~ .\1 0 l\Ju)w C.lJltJ~ICPHt:R :. )JYE ?HJUP A. ?crtP.:;C)N' ~ T"'Er"'E~ l... ?kuSS Ertle ~. Ross).4^~ 7"000 A, ;\O~SM~~ R.. .: TtJIH~ R VT1-IEP..FQ RO ,aJU)-.l(:"e R. W"rn: .-\riORNE:Y= A'r L.-\w :00 E.,,~7 ~;.~RL:-ON ..\VE"N1JE. ~U[TE J1 POST OF:;C::: BOX 11 SO .\1E=tlDJAN. !OAHO 83680~ l];u Tei.. ~ :UB) :~8..: 499 ~~.1.X : 20S) 18~.: ~o 1 \J AMf'A uFi=iC:; tOol Nl~n~ AVr.:l\lUE SOt)."., ;..C~'i'" OFFlC:= ~OX :'''1 \lAMP.~.lD^HO 8J653.ul.a7 ":"i:i.. ,Z,,~o "'~6..~Z 7~ (,AX \ lC:\ l "tH'..~OS ?l.E,.\:)c; ;tE?LY 70 MERlDIAN OFiC: F -~C5ilv1ILE TR~\1\jSiv1ITI~~L o ATE: JI. 3-99 TIlv1E: , /' TO: \ ~? )L ~Le~~ CO wrp .Ou'fY: F .0.\.,'( #: S !/f - ~I d)/ 17' PHONe; RE: (1)/7. ~l. d'vr.. NUMBER OF ?}-\.GE5; ~7) FROM: '1a,t( -(hX.-L/ VVh.ite, P c::e:-s on, Pruss, Lvlorrow & GiQ:!"c:i.v 1...,; _ :v.fe:idian Office PHONE: (:08) 288-2499 ,. j'#-.-{~a:''Le~ ::? I ~ (Inc!uain~ cove!" ::hee~) .i..(./ {J.'_.6'~ ~<. ~~..-?t..c:;t k.(:~/~ i:(:;t/'t..~ hJ /L.t-/f;; {2~-.tl-d~~ 7 - L-/' (:~nride!lri~ii("\'/ \j()'ce: ~ne '~:)nre~1r~ ,1! :ill~ :r~n~lnl~"'=~Lon .=-:t.c ~nte:H~e'''': :u ),p ~2~~ ..if't.u 'l~e'_! .)nlV ~~ :!1t7 :1Liiv.tciu~i.:o ',vnorn ..!:' S ~Jo.r12~~:':2.i. :f ~:C)t1 "'e':~~':c: ~111.": ::-~rlSin~~Sj()n ~.:-. .-;:=:~r '-teJ.f..: ."""1'1 )ur line') ":'U' -h':r 've ,,,,,,,,,...,\,' -I--.....l~;Q..U ~ilL" '0 ''''c ,icc"'rTIt2,..,'C :nLl '~uurc~ r"o "r"~ :-' - -- \.,;; '-"'~ \ \ .... - ,,- . c... > . ~.. 11.1: _ ... "'" 1 "; _.. :... .... ..... ..l . '.. .. . _ ....... _ .. , I . \)rij(;~ :'t ':A'&~ t.n'Ct:~lle'.J ~'t~r. ~:Cll :n~\" ~:.il ',,"~)Lie""':: ,r ~urlg- jI~~=.:.n<.:~: \ ::,)oj :~~_':4~.H..l. . l1zjnl,~:. AUG 03 '99 09:17 P...02 :J /&- :1. .2 / \ TBEct'. ~ ~. t(; .1 J~ P\.Tp '; \ ~- ' . "'-L-J ...K..~...',"j CITY Of M EltlDlAN AU6 1 7 1999 CITY OF lVIERIDIAN OROJNANCE NO. BY COUNCII~ M~:MBE[t: AN ORDINANCE OF fl~H~: cr.fV OF MERIDIAN, IDAlIO, AMENDING SUBSE<:TI()N A I. OF SEC'ltION 4 OF CHAP.l~ER 8 Of TITLE 1 MERIDIAN (~ITI' COnE TO lNClu:A.SE .1~HE MAYORS SALARY T() ($ ) PER MONTH AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ($ ) PER MONTH AND DELETING ANY PROVISION POR SEI>AltA'J'J:-.: SAl~Al{Y fOlt COUNCIL l'ltESIDEN'f; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ()RDAINED BY TIlE MAYOR AND TIrE C1TY COUN'ell OF TIlE CITY Of MERIDIAN, IDArIO: SECTION 1 :Thal Suhsection A I. and A 2. of Section 4 of Chapter ~ of Title I Meridian City Code be amended and the same is hereby amendt'd to read as follows: 1-8-4: SAI,Af~)ES: A. ElcClivc Officers: J · MaJyor: The salary of the Mayor sllall be 01\\: tl'{)d..~~t 11(1 t~\-y () t~llnd1"rd dollars ($1 ,200.()()) dollars ($ ) per month, payable monthly. L. Ct) 1.111cil: T11c salaI)r of ear h Il)f"Tlll)cr o[ the (~()l1rlcil ~}\ a II he hve 11ur'Ldrc{lll(>11ilr~ ($SOO.O()) dc)llars {~ ) per month, payable monthly. :1. <: ~() L1l1Cil I )rc:5 ide n I. Th f ~al al)i of tIle ~) r1.3i (Ie n. t. () f:"'t.}i c C<> U 1 'leil~ \VllCI1<lctiJlfl; in the cal)acit)ruf 1\1~1:{()r, ~halll)c tILl :;~\ll\C a:; the f\.1syor, pay"al)lc 11'l{}!ltlll:v prorated [()r tlic pcrio(l of tiI11C 11<': ~ll~lj l)Cr[{)fll"L tIle {lllt ie.'} of i\.1Ciyor. SEC~J~ION 2: i\ll orclillanccs, resolutiOI\s, orders or ~)arts l11cre()f ill <'~()11niCl herewil11 are l1ereby rCI)calcd) res(:in(l4..~rj aLld anllUllt:cl. Ol~J)J Ni\NCF, MA Y()R'S SAl.ARY - 1 AUG 17 '99 17:01 PAGE. 02 P...03 ( SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby dt'dare" Ih~H any st'ction. paragraph, scnt.cncC' or word of this Ordinance as adopted and alIlelldec.i herein he declared for ally reaSUIl to be irlvalid it is the intent ()f the Meridian City Council th:it it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of t he elimination herefrolIl of allY portiun as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS ClAUSE: 'rIds Ordin<lIH.:e doe~ llot affect an actiC)11 ()r l)f()cccding C:OH)I11t'nccd or righr ;~('cruetl beft)re thi~ Ordi"atlCe tak.e~ effect. SEC-l"\lON 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This ()rdi11ancc s}1all11c in fLlll ["()rcc and effect January 1, 2000, after its passage, approval and publication, according to 1a \V. PASSED HY TilE COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of ) 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, [DAIIO, this day of , 1999. MAYC)R ROBEltl- D. COl(Rrl~ A' lOJ J 'EST: (~I~rY CLEI{!( ln~wZ.\vV()1 k\.\'l\~'h"rit'i;flli I ').160M\()1 dlllan('c~\Cl1Y C( )VERNMENT OR DINANC ~E~\M:1~()rS;111lrv()rd()6'~09l.) ORDINANC:E MAYOR'S SAlARY w 2 AUG 17 '99 17:02 PAGE. 03 .......u~ interoffice MEMORANDUM To: T~ D C~ T~~ T~IIi-l i:< fl I . J J---" -'1- \ J.. - i J V.::'-- .....- AUG 1 7 1999 11'I"Onl : CITY OF lVIERIDIPL1~ Subject: Date: August 17, 1999 Will: Pursuant to a meet ing wit h t.he Mayor this aft ernoon, please find at (ac]1e{1 a new Draft ()rdinancr p('f1.ai n il1g lO l he <\11ovc Inall l'rs. Tn j~ ncvv Draft ordinanr:e h:~s heen prepared at the rcqu('s! of the' Mayor and my direCI ion 10 him for consideration as an alternative ill relation to Agenda Item No.2. Please keep this new ordinance [or lonighls City Council meeting. If YOtl tlave ~I\Y questiollS IJlease <u.lvist. tn~,IV L.\ W 01 k\]\t1\Tv1cl i dHH) I 5 ~ 60~1\..~1nyor :\ 11<1 Cnund l\n(,f,\{S/dary( hdOR I 799...."'leu. AUG 17 '99 17:01 PAGE. 01 P...02 (- Cll"Y OP MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. BY COUNCIl, MEM13f:l~: AN OItOINANCE OF "THE CIlY OP MERIDIAN, IDAIIO, AMENIJING SUBSECTION A 1. OF SECTION 4 OF CIIAPTER 8 OF TITLE] MERIDIAN CI~I'\Y CODE J-I"\O INCREASE THE NlAYORS SALARY TO ($ ) PER M()NTH AND CIlY C()UN(:IL MEMBERS T() ($ ) PER MONTIr AND DELETING ANY PROVISION fOR SEPARATE SALARY FOR COUNCIl. PRESIDEN'T; AND PR()VIDIN(; AN EFFECTIVE l)A TE. BE IT ORDAINED BY TIlE MAYOR AND TIlE CIlY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of MERIDIAN. IDAIIO: SECTION] :Th.al Subsection ^ 1. .and ^ 2. of Section 4 of Chapter 8 of Title 1 Mcridi:in (~ilv C:odc ]1C an1CJlde(t antl the ~allle is 11erellV alllel)c!ccI to rl::1.ti as ("o11()\vs: .I . 1-8-4: SAURIES: A. Elective Officers: 1. Mayor: The salary of the Mayor sllall l>e (}r\C th(Hl:,a11d l;W() hllr'~drfd d()lL~r3 ($1,2()O.OO) d()llar~ ($ ) per mOl'll h, payable monthly. 2. COUI1Cil: The ,c;;alary ()f eacll lIlelnl)cr of t he (:()uncil ~lla II be ~ bUl1(lrc(1 (lollars ($500.00) d()l1ars ($ ) per 1l1onlh, l)ayable lI10l)thlyf. 3. CO;'111Cil rr~idcrLt. "I-he 3aJ&fyY of L11( pfl':dflrnl of l11c (:u~lr)ciL \vh en 3.(:-:t irlg iri tlic (,~l psc:i l.)~ ()f !vIii y.ur, sh&1I ])( tIle ~alnc S.S L}re M~y()r, llRy.ablc IllOnthly pr()ratcJ for the. 11cri(){1 uf til))C h~ t',crf{)nrL tIle dill ics {,f Pvldy'or. SECTION 2: 1\11 orc..lillanccs) reS()ltltioL1S, orc..lers or parts tl\ercof in cUl\flicl. hert:\tvi t}\ arc 11er~ by rCI)calcd) re ~("i n dcd and <\ Tl J\ l.d led. Ol{l)rN1\.N(~:r: MAYOIZ'S SAIARY - 1 AUG 17 '99 16:58 P...03 SECTION 3: VALIDITY: "1l1e Meridian CilY Council hereby dedart':; that allY section, paragraph, srntl:IlCE' Or word of this Ordinance as adopted and alnen(icd herein 1)(' declared for all}' reaSUll tu be illvalid it is the inlt11l ()f t]1C Meridian City Council tItat it would hc.\Ve paslied all other ponions of this Ordinance indr.pr.ncknl nf the elimination herefrom of any purtion as lIlay be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SA V.INGS CLAUSE: 'fhis Ordirlancc C!()C'.'-' r)ot aff(tCl an actiorl or J,r()ceeding commenced or right accfllcd 11c[(>fc this ()rdinancc laJ<cs effect. SEC'l'ION 5: DAr-rE OF EPPE(:T: 'I-his ()rdinanc:c sha1111c in fllll j"()rcc and ('fji:'(l January J, 2000, after its pass~ge, approval :lnd puhIic::u ion, according 10 J 41 \V . PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEIUDlAN, IDAHO, thjs (lay ()f >> I 999. API')ROVED BY r-l~HE MAYOlt OF ~I"HE Clt!,y Of MEI~rl)IAN, JI)AlJO, ll,js day of , 1999. MJ\Y()R ROBElt'l~ D. C:()!(){( r~ A'l~ 14ES' If: Cl'l.Y CJ~rRI( n I:;gl L:\ W nr~\M\Mc.riJi:~r1 J s:~ 60M\()(dll,\f)I"\(.C's\c:rrv (;()VI=.H.:'\.' M ENT ()R I)) N^N(~LS\Jvl;\.v() 1'$:\1;) ryo()rdOf>1099 O}\r)INAN(~~I-: M^YOJ~:S SAlJ\J.(Y - 2 AUG 17 '99 16:58 PAGF . vr~ P..OJ. ( " interoffice MEMORANDUM RECE.rVE-lr-.") ~t \r ~,} AU6 1 7 1999 CITI OF rvmRIDw~ l,'rOln: To: Subject: Date: August 17\ 1999 Will: Pursuant to a meeting with the Mayor this ,)fternootl, plr:lS(~ find atrClched Cl new Draft Ordinance pertaining to (he above matters. This new Draft ordinance has been prepared at the request of the Mayur and my dircClion lO him for c()nsidcr.:\l j()n as an alternalive in relatio11 r() l\gell<.la ItelIl No.2 0 1_ PJe.\se keep thLs new ordinance for tnnights City Council mccting. If y<)U have all)' c.luestior\~ please auvit\eo rn,,:~/i'.,\vV()rk\M\Mt:rtJlt\11 ) 5:56()~1\MdYCJr Ctnu C(".111d)\HcrgSnl[lryOrrlO~ 1/(1) M(Oni AUG 17 '99 16:58 ( '\ f interoffice MEMORANDUM To: M -::ill? 0U6~~ ~cy "- cD/ld. h tu ~#~ r:td ~ UJ~~ a;I tiu ~ I. C I i .i i I i I I i From: Subject: Date: August 17, 1999 Will: Pursuant to a meeting with the Mayor attached a new Draft Ordinance pertaining to the at ordinance has been prepared at the request of the Iv consideration as an alternative in relation to Agenda Please l(eep this new ordinance for ton:' Yuo If you have any questions please advist msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Mayor and Council\BergSalaryOrd0817S ~ ~<~ a;/- L; -1" j;d~lm, , . to it! ~/ -AA'/ /1. ~ ,.. ~ ' .(/;;;;:' . ~ ( CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 837 BY COUNCIL MEMBER: t'ftairlie. /Cavn-treL AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, AMENDING SUBSECTION A 1. OF SECTION 4 OF CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE I MERIDIAN CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE MAYORS SALARY TO ($ ~ G67~) PER MONTH AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ($ . 500, '?!2 ) PER MONTH AND DELETING ANY PROVISION FOR SEPARATE SALARY FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: SECTION I :That Subsection A 1. and A 2. of Section 4 of Chapter 8 of Title 1 Meridian City Code be amended and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-8-4: SALARIES: A. Elective Officers: 1. Mayor: The salary of the Mayor shall be one thousand t...v~v~o hLIl'ldred dollars ($1,200.00) dollars ($ 1,66 7~ ~ ) per month, payable monthly. 2. Council: The salary of each member of the Council shall be five hundred dollars ($500.00) dollars ($ f:JoO. ~ ) per month, payable monthly. 3. Council President. The salar}~ of the prcsideIlt of the Council, "'/v"hen acting in the capacit~f of I\1~r~vor, shall be the san'le as the l\.1ay~or, pay"ablc monthly prorated for the period of tini.c he shall pcrform the duties of 1\1aJ'-or. SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - I ( SECTION 3: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the' Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance takes effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect January I, 2000, after its passage, approval and pllblication, according to law. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 17~ day of ~..f C ,1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. NrAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE ATTEST: CITY CLERI( n1sg/Z:\ W ork\lV1\Meridian 15360 M\Ordinances\CITY GOVERNMENT 0 RD INANCES\IVlayorSalaryOrdO 63 099 ORDINANCE MAYOR'S SALARY - 2 / ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17. 1999 APPLICANT: DEPARTMENT REPORTS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 221A REQUEST: GARY SMITH - CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR WELL NO. 18 PUMP AND PUMPHOUSE AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: C1TY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION CITY WATER OEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMA liON: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ \q OJf-r l}4 ~ b ,0 ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: (- INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: :MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: GARY D. SMITH, PE SUBJECT: WELL NO.i8 - .PUMP AND PUMPHOUSE - aIANGE ORDER NO.1 J)Jl~ 08/02/99 CC: FILE Attached is Change Order No.1 for this well project. This Change Order adjusts the final quantities of the contract to construct the Pump and Pumphouse fot this well. The majority of the costs in this change oroer deal with replacement of the sod and sprinkler system that took a beating during the drilling of the well. Even though the well lot is owned by the City of Meridian, the developer and ot: the Homeowners Association had improved the ground sutface with sprinklers and grass and it was ow: responsibility to see that the surface was :restored to its original condition. We had restricted the driller's movements, however, the area we had set aside was not large enough and couple4 with the wet weather we lost quite a bit more ground cover than we expected. I request yow: approval of this Change Onler No.1 to final the quantities for the building of Well No.18, Pump and Pumphouse. Regards, Gary Change Order No. 1 - Final Qua( ies Contract For: Well No. 18 Pumping Facilities Owner: The City of Meridian Contractor: Irminger Construction, Inc. Date: 7/30/99 State of Idaho Ada County . Description of Changes Decrease in Contract Increase in Contract (Supplemental Plans and Specifications Attached) Price Price 1. Bid Item 2a - Add 7558 square feet of additional lawn sod $4,534.80 restoration due to well drilling operations exceeding planned work area at revised unit price of 0.60/sf. 2. Bid Item 2b - Add $435.58 to orjginallump sum bid price for $435.58 additional sprinkler system adjustments required due to well drilling operations exceeding planned work area 3. Bid Item 3 - Add $1,041.81 to original lump sum bid price $1,041.81 for the Vertical Turbine Pump & Motor for the addition of 20 feet of additional 1 A" column and shaft required based upon the final as-constructed well performance. Totals $0.00 $6,012.1 9 Net ChanQe In Contract Price $6,012.19 Justification: Items covered under this change order adjust the final contract price to reflect the as constructed quantities. The amount of the Contract will be Increased by the sum of Six Thousand Twelve and 19/100 dollars ($6012.19) The total for this Contract including all previous Change Orders will Be One Hundred Fifty One Thousand Nine Hundred Thirtv Three and 78/100 dollars ($151.933.78). This document will become sup lemental to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. ~ Requested by: a-Jz/19 Date Accepted by: Q,~ \~ ~ . Irminger Construction, Inc. - Carllrminger 7-Jb-.7f Date "\ .O(j , ~C\ Date Recommended by: RECEIVED JUl 3 0 1999 MEFdDIAN CITY ENGfNEEP COMPANY,IINC, 4444 SO YELLO\\'STC~.E HWY. P.O. SOX 51259 IDAHO FALLS. IDAHO 83405 PHONE: 208 I !2g.6a68 1 -8OO..427-QSSa FAX {20SJ 529..4332 SILL TO: IRMINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3473 BROOKSIDE LANE BOISE [D 83703 ShiP TO; ........- -".- --''''-'' --- --. . ,-,-_.. - ---- - ""1-- .' .. INVOICE DATE 5/18/1999 INVOICE" 12393 ~t)'3 Carl EW 5/18/1999 DELIVERD IDAHO FALLS Net 30 · J_.1;'Jili,' I r~\-l ,.:, ::; 1 Floway __ . t........ _...... ---..~....;_~___ ...._____.....,~~""" ~Jo1:i Name: Meridiari'WeU'# 18 --- ,,'.-..----, -~-- ,~_. - ,_. - FJoway 125HP Deepwell pump as follows per quote: I - 125HP U.S. Inverter Duty Motor 1 - 10" Floway Discharge Head 80' - lOx 1-1/2 Column & Shaft Assy 1 - FJoway 14DKNI Bowl Assy 1 .. 10' x Ion Suction Pipe 1 - 10" Cone Strainer I .. Soleplate 80' - lit PVC Air Line & Fittings 2 - John Crane Model 3710 Split Seals 20' Extra Column & Shaft per engineers request IDAHO 5% SALES T J\X 1 Other r ~\',~ ~\~\Q. \\~\Q. \ ~C-I~ ~ \-~~ ~~ ~~ \.a~{ 0 ~~~ \~,~ PI9Ati Atmit tg& DAnk Qf~..t&l:R I<J-aholJ Busin~5S ~4'2a38~, PO Box 1726, Idaho Falls. ID 83403 9-0 t 53 22,301,00 22,301.00 880.00 5,000/0 880.00 1,159i05 4. S~-\ ~cl-4~ \ C'..J\ ~ ~~ ~5~ . \~4,,\B~~ TOTAL $24,340.05 .,()is s J: ll~.&t.;J8 , - ~~ d':(',t' ;~~ '. '1.. 2eS4'3528el ( . C'R p~ Sl/Bl 208 939-1031 · 3473 BraoQIde lane Bolle. to 83703 FAX/MEMO ... '" .....". . -... ~ .----..... ..--....,.......... - - Ion IDe CUI&. 1nDID_.r -- - ---.--- I ..... - . I...... CcM~ I ~'-1 Ne.Inbet ct IIagM \ Iq9 ...... TO -- \+ ~ o L ,~ \ RIMWa: ~ ~f'C"'- ?~ ~ e...,\, ~ ~ \..QQ.\\. \~ ~~ Ccl.~\ ~ ~?~,~\~ C~b ') \<<.~Q." ~ i:) \\~'('C" ~ ~ ~~~\ \~,....\$~ S ~ ~o ~[ I~ . " \ ~~ : \~ ,D8J~ t- r ~o cP Q o~...~ t;.s., \"'~~ t:; \:, #.. \. -. \\-4,.~- OU 'l..1:C"V~ \5 S e:, .. lC ~ b9- -: 4.%~4 B~ V ~u ~o,cfJ ..b~ -r~ 89 .' ru' ~'. b,~$~~~\O\\ '\f'\. ~(."tc.e.. 0,Q ~o r. ; ~ _ . \ ...-?, ~ "\ \. O~~ ~ ~' .' ~,~ ..\-.'~-.,~ ~ .. ~~. ~.?'t~c.n ;1cl Vb\\' \\~\U,,-(jl' ~(\c:..~ a~...<::., '-.. ~ · ~ \~ ;lb<;C)~- ~\. ?\""\.",ca. 3~~b~ SBlv · ~o.-- ~~... <.\A~. 4~S -I\\\U~~ ~V~ '\'0 (j,(e.O \~'-. ~~~\ iOS · b'\~ \'\b~~~, ~t · I ~ ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17. 1999 APPLICANT: DEPARTMENT REPORTS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 221 B REQUEST: GARY SMrrH - CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION WWTP AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE OEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING OEPT: CITY WATER OEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: (j;~O~ US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: AI! Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( I Memorandum .+..~"+'~. .......... ...........~_ '.r'~...._.. ~~.~.....~~...~..................................................~~.~~.~_~.~~_~~___......~~ ~~......-::;::;:::",:",.~'.~~r;:..':..:::":,'~..-:.:..~~.:::,,,:~~'::::,,:,:,::.:,:,::,,;:..:J.....-:;::;.:..::.7'""':":::.~:";'~":;:",,"":':'..-;:::.:::;"'::::.:::...-=:..:..:-";.:..;.;;:..:...~~....:.:...~~: To: MA VOR CORRIE file Gary D. Smith, PE /1,." _ , 08/10/99 /0 Construction Inspection - Wastewater Treatment Plant Projects cc: From: Date: Re: .....--.......................-..~~- _.........__......---..................~ ~.........................~..................~~~....~ ..............I-+-o...-..........~....--.-........ . ...._.........................~~......... I have been concemed that the construction projects at the wastewater treatment plant are receiving adequate inspection during the building process. .In that regard Brad Watson and I met with Ed Ankenman, who has done project inspection work for one of ~~ineers YJe have retained to do project design work at the wastewater plant ~-~-_.....................................~. ~. ..-..................~......._.....~~~..~. .~""""""'.......__................_..........r.~............ .1_..........-...............-..........- ~~"[~bmitted a proposed contract between himself and the City of Meridian to doftfrefconstruction inspection work at the lant for the ro.acts that we resenUy have ..._-......_..._._...~..~."---. P P ~ P yoae~~~~tract. He is proposing an hourly rate to us since he will not always be needed ~~lfie~~ite. He will however, be available to inspect the vvork as needed to assure usttnatttfle contrador is constructing the project in accordance with the project plans. 8. ~)?!~~!Us prooosal is attached for your review. .................................--............_~............... _-.....-..........~_................................~.~ . ~......__..~_........................~......_.n~ ........-.-.....----....~.._.................._....-...- - -......................... ~....... ~................................... ~. ~. _.......~-_........ ...................-...........................--..................................- ~.~.-....._--........__.............I.~............._.... ~..r~.._~.~................_....I_.~~.~... .. ....~~.......~......_................ -++...."'-~~ ,- .~~ ~.L....._,~_.........._....~....._I~....., ~.. ~.~.~ I~-- .~.~_........._.........._ ~-..-' _r __ ~..................._............----.......I~......... ..~.~............. .....~.----................-...-._...~......... - ....... ......+-_.......-.....---~.....-.........-.._-._.....~ r__..........~~___......................-........._~__.. ..~......-......._........._.........................._...... .......+..............~............._......--................+++..............- -....-.......~ ...........................---..-. ...... .._.~- ~ .........~,........_......~....-..........~ ~.~.. ~........... ..........._.............~...................-++~ ~.~_......-...~.....................__.....~-..... ~.....~. +. ...~_......~ ._...._.__....._I~- _... ~....._I-+-o'........._.~...........~_......_........ .....+_.............~_..............+.>..........-.._... ~._..... ..--...............~..._...........+-._...u ..~ .~~.........-...... .....~~,....'I-....~...... ..........~..~~ ....................r_.............~ ._~ .. ----.....~.............~. ~......... ~ -........... ~ --.- ~.......4........~..............._1-+.................... ~.I....-.~........_......._.................,. .-...-..........................-......-............ +-~~~....~~...._~-.........~ .-.................--....................-........... ~~.......~.....................+"_+..- ...._.._...._....~..........+--'-o-o'...... ._~........~_.......~....~.......-.......... ~._......~~...._'..................... ........_.~....--............~~- Ifu1fl~~ past, we haw relied on some of John Shawaoft's personnel, primarily his aSSistant superintendent, along with some visits by a representative of the project's design engineer at critical periods of the construction process. Ed will be able to support us with a more or less full time inspection process thereby relieving other costs we have had to pay to the design engineer and relieving the responsibility that was placed on John's personnel to look after parts of the construction. We have talked to the design engineers of both projects presently under construction and they do not have any problem with us retaining our ovvn inspection person. They have asked, and we have obviously agreed, to keep them in the loop as the project is being built, especially as it concerns problems dealing \Yith the design. Another part of this inspection issue is that we have to certify to DEQ within 30 days after a project is completed that the project was constructed in substantial conformance with the approved plans and specification. Having our 0VvTl inspector will maf<e this certification much easier to provide. 1 ( \ ( August 10, 1999 As far as total costs are concerned, Brad and I are estimating an approximate expenditure of $5,000. per month for a 9.month time period. This equates to $45,000 for $4.3 Million dollars of construction (two projects). I request your approval to place this on the August 17, 1999 City Council agenda with distribution of the above infonnation to the Council. Regards, Gary 2 ( CONTRACT BETWEEN CI1Y OF MERIDIAN AND- ANKAGEM CONSTRUCTION This contract is made and entered into this day of August 1999, by and between the City of Meridian (hereinafter referred to as the Owner), and Ed Ankenman, dba Ankagem Construction (Hereinafter referred to as the Consultant). SECTION 1 TERM 1. I The term of this contract will commence on August ---J 1999 and end on the date which is fifteen (15) days after the completion of construction of the project, unless terminated pursuant to Section 12 or Section 13 below. SECTION 2 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Words, tenns, and phrases which are not specifically defined in this contract will have the ordinary meaning ascribed to them in the engineering profession unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. When consistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future, words in the plural number include the singular and words in the singular include the plural. 2.1.1 "Project" means the construction phases of the City of Meridian Digester and Clarifier Facilities and City of Meridian Biosolids Dewatering Projects. SECTION 3 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 3.1 Consultant will provide basic services to Owner as necessary for the on-site inspection of the construction of the Project as described in the Work Plan/Scope of Services section of Exhibit A, the Consultant's proposal, which is attached to this contract. 3.2 In connection with the services, Consultant will: 3.2.1 Consult with appropriate representative of the Owner to clarify and define Owner's requirements for the services. 3.2.2 Review available information concerning the services. 3.263 Identify information which is not available and is needed to fulfill the services, and act as Owner's representative in obtaining such information. 3.2.4 Cooperate with other consultants retained by the City of Meridian in the exchange of information needed for performing services. -1- ( 3 ~ 3 Consultant will perform the services as an independent contractor in accordance with generally accepted standards applied by professionals of Consultant's caliber~ Consultant will be responsible for the professional quality, technical accura,cy, and the coordination of all services performed by the Consultant. Consultant will, without additional compensation, correct or revise any error of deficiencies in the services that are caused by the Consultant's negligence. SECTION 4 CONSULTANT'S PERSONNEL 4~ I Consultant acknowledges that the Owner is relying upon the qualifications of Consultant's personnel, if any~ Consultant has represented, and by entering into this contract, now represents, that the Consultant is in full compliance with the applicable statutes of the State of Idaho relating to licensing of professional personnel and that all personnel assigned to perform services are fully qualified to perform the services in a competent and professional manner~ SECTION 5 RESPONSffiILITY OF OWNER 5.1 Owner will cooperate fully with Consultant to achieve the objectives of this contract~ The Owner will provide to the Consultant complete infonnation and criteria for performance of seIVlces. 5.2 Owner will provide all permits, products, and necessary information. SECTION 6 SCHEDULE 6.1 Consultant will perform the services a expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care. 6.2 Consultant will provide monthly progress reports with the invoices for Consultant's services. Each report will describe the services provided since the preceding report and the services which the Consultant expects to complete prior to the next report. SECTION 7 PAYMENT 7.1 Owner will pay Consultant at a rate of $40.00 per hour. 7.2 Owner will reimburse Consultant for expenses incurred by Consultant in performance of services. Expenses will be limited to film and developing, office supplies, telephone service (if required), and project-related mileage, not including mileage to and from the job site. 7.3 Consultant will submit monthly invoices to Owner for Consultant's services and reimbursable expenses within thirty (30) days after the end of the month covered by the statement. The -2- ( Owner will pay Consultant within thirty (30) days after the receipt and approval of each invoice. 7.4 The parties anticipate that Consultant's fees and reimbursable expenses may increase over time. Owner and Consultant will review fees and expenses prior to any extension of the contract term, and the parties may agree to modify the payment rates for any annual extension If the parties cannot agree on fees and reimbursable expenses, the contract will not be extended. 7.5 Owner will not be indebted or liable for any obligation created by this contract in violation of the debt limitation, its Charters or State Law. 7.6 Owner has appropriated funds for the services that will be provided during the current fiscal year. In the event that a billing from the Consultant is not paid within thirty (30) days, the Consultant may immediately suspend performance under this agreement. In the event that no funds or insufficient funds to pay for the services are appropriated for subsequent fiscal years, Owner will immediately notify Consultant, and this contract will terminate on the last day of the fiscal year for which appropriations are made~ SECTION 8 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 All documents prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this contact will be the property of the Owner. SECTION 9 INDEN1NIFICATION 9.1 This section will apply to all tort claims, except claims for professional liability. Consultant will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Owner, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims, actions, subrogation, judgements, court costs, and other expenses resulting from any injury to any person or damage to property, of whatsoever nature arising out of the activities of the Consultant pursuant to this Contract (including but not limited to, the acts and omissions of Consultants officers, employees, agent~ and subcontractors)~ Consultant will not be held responsible for damages directly, solely, and proximately caused by the negligence or other tortious acts of the Owner. SECTION 10 INSURANCE 10.1 Consultant will, at all times during the term of this contract, maintain in force: 10.1.1 An automobile liability insurance policy. 10.1.2 A professional liability insurance policy~ 10.2 The coverage under the automobile liability insurance policy will be equal to minimum coverage of $500,000 per occurrence (combined single limit for bodily injwy and property -3- (- (<,"-~- ( damage claims) or $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $100,000 per occurrence for property damage. The professional liability insurance policy will have a combined single limit, or the equivalent of $1,000,000 for each claim, incident, or occurrence. 10.3 Certificates of insurance acceptable to the Owner will be filed with the Owner prior to the commencement of any services by Consultant. Each certificate will state that coverage afforded under the policy cannot be canceled and restrictive modifications cannot be made until at least 30 days prior to written notice has been given to the Owner. SECTION 11 COMPLIANCE WITH LAW 11.1 This contract will be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho. Consultant will perfonn its obligations under this contract in accordance with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and the regulations now, or hereafter in effect. SECTION 12 DEFAULT 12.1 There will be a default under this contract if either party materially fails to comply with any provision of this contract within fifteen days after the other party gives written notice specifying the breach. If the breach specified in the notice cannot be completely cured withing the fifteen-day period, no default will occur if the party receiving the notice begins curative action within the fifteen-day period and thereafter proceeds with reasonable diligence and in good faith to cure the breach as soon as practicable. 12.2 Notwithstanding subsection 12.1, either party may declare a default by written notice to the other party, without allowing an opportunity to cure, if the other party repeatedly, materially breaches the terms of this contract. 12.3 Pending final resolution of a dispute, or pending termination of this contract under this section, the parties will proceed diligently with the performance of this contract, unless the Owner decides to suspend payments. 12.4 If a default occurs and it is not resolved under subsection 12.3 above, the party injured by the default may elect to terminate this contract and pursue any equitable or legal rights and remedies available under Idaho law. 12.5 Any litigation arising out of this contract will be conducted in Circuit Court or District Court of the State of Idaho for Ada County. 12.6 In the event of any breach of this contract by the Consultant, the Owner's cause of action against Consultant will not be deemed to accrue until the Owner discovers such breach, or should have, with reasonable diligence, discovered such breach. However, the preceding sentence will not be construed to allow the Owner to prosecute an action against the Consultant beyond the maximum time limitations provided by Idaho law. -4- / { SECTION 13 TERMINATION WITHOUT DEF AUL T 13.1 In addition to the right to terminate this contract under section 12, either party may tenninate by giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 13.2 Any tennination under this section will be without prejudice to any obligations or liabilities of either party already accrued prior to such tennination. 13.3 If the Owner terminates the contract under this section, the Consultant will have the right to complete such analyses and records as may be necessary to place its files in order and to protect its professional reputation. 13.4 If Owner terminates the contract under this section, the Consultant will be paid for all fees earned and costs incurred prior to the tennination date and reasonable fees and costs for actions pursuant to subsection 13.3. The Consultant will not be entitled to compensation for anticipated profits on services that are not performed prior to the notice of termination. SECTION 14 NOTICE 14.1 Any notice required to be given under this contract will be in writing and will be given by personal delivery, mail, or facsimile transmission. Any notice required to be given by law, will be given in the manner specified by the applicable law. 14.2 Notice to the Owner will be directed to: Mr. Brad Watson Assistant City Engineer City of Meridian 200 East Carlton, Suite 100 Meridian, ill 83642 Notices to the Consultant will be directed to: Ed Ankenman Ankagem Construction Inspection Services 23412 Lansing Lane Middleton, ill 83644 SECTION 15 NOWAIVER 15.1 No provision of this contract will be deemed waived unless such waiver is in writing and signe4 by the party alleged to have waived its rights. Any waiver of a breach by either party, whether express or implied, will not constitute a waiver of any different breach. -5- ( 15.2 The Owner's review, approval, or acceptance of services or payment for services will not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this contract. SECTION 16 SEVERABll..ITY 16..1 If any provision of this Contract is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such invalidity will not affect any other provisions of this Contract, and this Contract will be construed as if the invalid provision had never been included in the Contract. SECTION 17 MODIFICATION 17.1 No modification of this Contract will be valid unless in writing and signed by all parties involved. SECTION 18 SUCCESSORS 18.1 The Owner and the Consultant and the respective successors, assigns, and legal representatives of each are bound by this Contract to the other party and to the successors, assigns, and legal representatives of the other party~ The Consultant will not assign the Consultant's rights or obligations under this Contract or enter into any subcontracts for the performance of the services without prior written consent of the Owner. SECTION 19 ENTIRE AGREE~NT 19.1 This Contract and the attached exhibits constitute the final and complete agreement of the parties and supersede all prior and existing or oral understandings except as otherwise continued in effect by the terms of this Contract. Authorized representatives of the parties have signed in confirmation of this Contract, with effective date the .day and year first above written. CITY OF ~RIDIAN ED ANKENMAN dba ANKAGEM CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES By: By: Robert D. Corrie, Mayor Ed Ankenman, Owner Attest: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk -6- ( (~ EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Consultant shall be responsible for field inspection services which will include the following: 1. Provide. on-site inspection to monitor the progress of the Contractor's work and compliance with the Construction Contract Documents. 2. Complete Daily and Weekly Progress Reports using a form to be furnished by the Consultant. 3. Attend weekJy Progress Meetings with the Contractor, Engineer, and Owner. 4. Coordinate with Engineer to provide necessary cJarifications and interpretations of Construction Contract Documents as requested by the Contractor in the Field. 5. Review and verify quantities of work completed for Contractor's Progress Payment Requests" 6. Prepare punch list of pending items and conduct final inspection. 2.0 Project Communications 1 . When questions arise during field inspection of the work as to conformance or non-conformance with the Contract Documents, Consultant will inform the Engineer. The Engineer.will then determine conformance and either communicate directly with Contractor or direct Coflsultant to inform Contractor. Engineer wilf keep Consultant informed of communications made directly between the Engineer and the Contractor. 2. Copies of all Correspondence, Requests for Information, Shop Dra'Nings, Payment Requests, and change orders will be given to Consultant for his use in the field. Consultant will be responsible for reviewing this correspondence for up-ta-date inspecti.on of the ContractorJs work. 3. Consultant win describe all conversations with Contractor along with his field observations in the Daily Report. Copies of Daily Reports along with a summary weekly report will be given to Engineer at the end of each week. 3.0 Responsibilities and Umitations 1 ~ Consultant will have the responsibility to observe the work in progress and take any tests or measurements as required to aid Engineer in determination of conformance with Contract Documents, as described above. 2. Consultant's authority at the job site will be limited as the Engineer's authority is limited in Section 9.10 of the General Conditions of the construction Contract Documents. C:'i3VN38W<<EXA.YVPO ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17. 1999 APPLICANT: DEPARTMENT REPORTS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 221C REQUEST: GARY SMITH - CONTRACT MODIFICATION - USTICK RESERVOIR & BOOSTER PUMP STATtoN AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE OEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: seE ATTACHED INFORMATION CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRtGA TION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: w(f"J/ INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMA liON: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become properly of the City of Meridian. )P ( ( 4~C 41.1& :eI"Vb ~- I ~:o c".~~~o I /!) ~ o~ '.ll.s 0 .....::99 ... A+....' r.p,./it "'~./t.l :toe ~~ Memornndum To: MAYOR CORRIE cc: file I City Attorney From: Gary Smith, PE Date: 08/10/99 Re: Contract Modification - Ustick Reservoir & Booster Pump Station Mayor: Here is a submitted "Contract Modification No.1" for this project. The justification for the submittal is shown under "Reason for Modification(s);" and is basically weather related. t.~,"rtsubmitting this to you with a request to place it on the August 11h City Cc:)~nc;il" agenda under my Department RepOrts for approval by the Council. CH2M t1~~Ting~ded some climatological data with this request. I have reviewed it and agree WiYJ..:m~.~~~gineer's recommendation to approve of the request ,,~ _., h ......,._ - .. "" .,., .. - ... .. .___ , __0_.,' __ A$,:~you::wUI note, approval of this modification will extend the completion date to July 30, '1'~.$/whiCh has passed. The contractor is now in default of their contract and is, by th~:~'qgntract Document, subject to liquidated Damages. I am meeting with Bill Gigray an<:t.":CH2M this coming Friday afternoon to discuss procedure for sending a notification t(:f~E:icontractor of their delinquency. ,;: I) f- / {PPf (Y pjpft . ~ 1 - ',,:,,.~.... CH2MHfLL o CHANGE ORDER ( ( CONTRACT MODIFICA TION [K] WRITTEN AMENDMENT MODIFICATION N01: 1 TO CONTRACTOR: McAlvain Construction, Inc. PROJECT: Ustick Reservoir and Booster Pump Station PROJECT NO: 141841 OWNER: City of Meridian, Idaho ENGINEER: CH2M HILL The following modification(s) to the Contract are hereby ordered (use additional pages if required): Increase the Contract Completion Time by 22 calendar days. The new Contract Completion Date will be July 3D. 1999. This increase is for time only and the amount of the Contract will remain unchanged. - The reason for the modification is a 22 day weather delay requested by the Contractor. The basis for the modification is due to the amount and distribution of the precipitation during the month of February 1999. A review of historical climatological data indicated the February 1999 rainfall ranked 3 rd out of 60 years of record. Attachments (List Supporting Documents): February, 1999, Climatological Report for Boise Idaho Contract Amount or Price Contract Times (Calculate Days) Original Previous Contract Modification(s) (Add/Deduct) This Contract Modification (Add/Deduct) $1,4971000 Original Duration 240 Days Previous Contract Modification( s) (Add/Deduct) 0 Days This Contract Modification (Add/Deduct) 22 Days Revised Contract Time 262 Days $0 $0 Revised Contract Amount $1,497,000 The Revised Contract Completion Date is: July 30 119 99 Owner Engineer Recommendation2 By: By: By: Date: Date: 1 Number all Modifications consecutively. 2 Recommendation necessary for Change Orders. B-3 Copies:Owner Field File REV 10/95 FORM 273 " , , (~ REB'CLIMATOLOGICAL REP0Kf FOR BOISE IDAHO ...~;;: ./ :...-' I . -;'/ :;','~:' ,i _.~i.A.r Ii.f-IJ' ~ : ' 'If) :I: " ,.._ ;b"~ - : : ~ If' ~ * . "\.~, ZCZC BOILCDFEB TTAAOO KBOI 010724 Prelimin~ LOcal Cl~tological Data tws Fo~: F-6) Station: BO~SE IDAHO Month: FEB Year: 1999 Page I of 3 Temperature in F : :Pcpn : Snow: 'Wind :Sunshine: ,Sky :Pk Wnd ===================================== Columns ================================= 1 2 3 4 5 6a 6b 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Dy Max Kin Avg Dep HOD CDD ;Wtr....,-Snw--'Dpth Avg Spd Dir Min Psbl S-S Wx =============================================================================== 17 18 Spd Dr =============================================================================== 1 2 3 4 5 6 . ,7 :a '~~'9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 39 35 42 44 44 44 50 44 58 33 37 43 43 34 45 48 41 42 44 46 45 39 SO 57 47 43 51 56 26 28 18 29 25 34 35 30 27 22 20 23 28 27 27 33 29 30 29 26 32 28 38 41 33 30 35 42 ,33 32 30 37 35 39 43 37 43 28 .29 . .. 33 36 31 36 41 35 36 37 36 39 34 44 49 40 37 43 49 8m 1244 825 1 o -3 4 2 5 9 3 8 -7 -6 -2 o -5 o 5 -2 -1 o -1 1 -4 6 11 1 -2 4 10 32 33 35 28 30 26 22 28 2~ 37 36 32 29 34 29 24 30 29 28 29 26 31 21 16 25 28 22 16 o 0.00 o 0 ~'~_12li o 0.00 o 0.02 o 0.00 o 0.13 o 0.,30: o 0.01 o 0.07 o T; o O.OO! o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0 ~ 11 ,~ o T o 0.02 o 0.22 o ',0.12.' o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0 .11~ o 0.03 o 0.07 o 0 .15 · o 0.10 o T o 0.02 o 0.36 o 1.96 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 T 0.0 0.1 . ( 0.2 T. 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 ."T 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 o 8.1 3 11.1 3 8.1 1 9.1 o 11.4 o 14.7 o 9.7 o 14.2 o 15.4 T 6'.5 o 12.3 o 12.7 o 4.6 o 4.0 o 3.2 o 11.6 o 7.5 o 14.4 o 11.0 o 15.0 o 11.2 o 11.6 o 13.5 o 13.2 o 7.8 o 5.5 o 13.2 o 12.3 5.7 292.9 16 20 21 20 21 29 23 29 26 18 18 25 20 10 11 23 36 31 24 30 24 20 20 23 25 17 23 21 300 110 150 300 140 110 290 150 300 300 140 160 150 310 31.0 120 300 110 300 110 120 120 120 110 260 320 110 110 555 o 72 179 465 o 96 ;5 - l18 i7'S 563 231 o o 230 o 53 o 296 69 55 o o 16 o 9 o 20 93 '0 12 30 77 o 16 1 3 28 95 37 o o 36 o 8 o 46 11 .8 o o 2 o 1 o 3 M M 1,2,8 M 1 M 1 M M 1 M 1 M 1- M 1 M Q .0'- '.0 o 8,1,2 o 2,1,8 M 1 M 1 M 1 M M M 1,2 M M M 1 M 1 M M M 1 20 22 25 23 23 33 26 34 31 24 22 32 26 11 13 30 40 38 28 39 31 23 22 28 30 22 28 24 300 120 160 310 140 120 270 150 310 300__ 130 150 160 310 110 120 300 110 310 110 110 120 110 110 260 310 110 120 =============================================================================== Av 44.4 29.5 778 3107 10.5 Fastst Psbl % Mise ----> 36 300 17159 18 M M Max (mph) 40 .-.3.00 0~~~========================================================================_~=== "'--~':~\', ~)tes : :::-.::~~:'::' Last of several occurrences Column 17 Peak Wind in M.P.H. Preliminary Local Climatological Data (WS Form: F-6) , Paoe 2 fE~ CLIMATOLOGICAL RE{ .{T FOR BOISE IDAHO [Temperature Data] Average Monthly: 37.0 Dptr fm normal: 1 . 1 Highest: 58 on 9 Lowest: 18 on 3 [No. of Days with] Max 32 or below: 0 Max 90 or above: 0 Kin 32 or below: 20 Min 0 or below: 0 [HDD (Base 65) ] Total this Mo. Dptr fm normal Seasonal total Dptr fm. normal 778 -37 3832 -534 [eDD Base 65} ] Total this Mo. ,__--..Dptr fIn normal (~~~~.fasonal total ~tr fm normal ( Page 2 of 3 Station: BOISE IDAHO Month: FEB Year: 1999 [Precipitation Data] Total for Month: 1.96 Dptr fm. normal: 0.89 Grtst 24hr 0.38 on 27-28 SNOW, ICE PELLETS, HAIL Total month: 5.7 Inches Grtst 24hr on Grtst depth: 3 on 3 [WEATHER - Days with] 0.01 inch or more: 17 0.10 inch or more: 10 0.50 inch or more: 0 1.00 inch or more: 0 Clear (scale 0-3) Ptcldy (scale 4-7) Cloudy (scale 8-10) M M M SYMBOLS USED IN COLUMN 16 1 = FOG 2 FOG REDUCING VISIBILITY TO 1/4 MILE OR LESS 3 THUNDER 4 ICE PELLETS 5 = HAIL 6 = GLAZE OR RIME 7 = BLOWING DOST OR SAND: VSBY 1/2 MILE OR LESS 8 = SMOKE OR HAZE 9 = BLOWING SNOW x = TORNADo =============================================================================== o o o o [Pressure Data] Highest SLP 30.71 Lowest ~LP 29.36 on 11 on 09 ZCZC BOICLMBOI TTAAOO KBOI 011542 FEB CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT FOR BOISE IDAHO NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BOISE IDAHO 1224 AM MST MON MAR 01 1999 TEMPERATURE DATA...... (DEGREES F) AVERAGE MONTHLY TEMPERATURE.... 37.0 OR 1.1 DEGREES ABOVE NORMAL AVERAGE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE.... 44.4 AVERAGE MINIMUM TEMPERATURE.... 29. 5 HIGHEST TEMPERATURE WAS 58 ON DAY 9 LOWEST TEMPERATURE WAS 18 ON DAY 3 HEATING DEGREE DAYS MONTHLY TOTAL ........... DEPARTURE FROM NORMAL.... SEASONAL TOTAL (JUL-JUN). DEPARTURE FROM NORMAL.... -~ L~~ ~~kCIPITATION DATA.. '._' TOTAL FOR THE MONTH......... TOTAL SINCE JANUARY 1ST..... GREATEST 24 HOUR RAINFALL WAS TO'T' n. T. H"{,)P ".,UP ",,orf""\""TnnT (BASE 65) COOLING DEGREE DAYS 778 MONTHLY TOTAL .......... 0 -37 DEPARTURE FROM NORMAL... 0 3832 SEASONAL TOTAL (JAN-DEC) 0 -534 DEPARTURE FROM NORMAL... 0 · · RA..IN. . 1 · ,96 OR 0 . 89 INCHES ABOVE NORMAL 3. 36 OR 0.84 INCHES ABOVE NORMAL 0.38 INCHES ON DAY(S) 27-28 . . SNOW. . t; FRS CLIMATOLOGICAL REPd FOR BOISE IDAHO ( TOTAL FOR THE SEASON........ 1.6.2 GREATEST 24 HOUR SNOWFALL WAS INCHES ON DAY(S) . . NUMBER OF DAYS. . "ITH .01 INCHES OR MORE 17 HIGHS 32 DEGREES OR COLDER 0 lITH .10 INCHES OR MORE 10 HIGHS 90 DEGREES OR WARMER 0 WITH .50 INCHES OR MORE 0 LOWS 32 DEGREES OR COLDER 20 WITH 1.00 INCHES OR MORE 0 LOWS 0 DEGREES OR COLDER 0 Page 3 of 3 SKY CONDITION......... SEA LEVEL PRESSURE. '. . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER OF DAYS CLEAR M NUMBER OF DAYS PTCLDY .. M NUMBER OF DAYS CLOUDY M HIGHEST 30. 71 INCHES_ ON DAY 11 LOWEST 29.30 INCHES ON DAY 09 WIND DATA....-......... THE AVERAGE MONTHLY WIND SPEED WAS 10.5 MPH THE FASTEST TWO-MINUTE WIND WAS... 36 MPH FROM 300 DEGREES THE HIGHEST PEAK WIND GUST WAS... . 40 FROM 300 DEGREES ~... END. . . NNNN --.. +..... ~.~r_._~__+~ ~4 ___.~. ...~....._ __.~~.................".. _~............... .'~_........ .~~_.. _.~ ~_.........~.~ ......_.....__..~..... ..~~ ~~ ) ,,,-:.:.~:...,,, 1~=:I______ICO~Ar1_ ~t"':" :.,..... ~~~~;.G~~!~~ "": . ~_... ::.... .~.:...~ ......~:;.L.~ ( \ ( MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: AUGUST 17. 1999 APPLICANT: DEPARTMENT REPORTS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 221 D REQUEST: GARY SMITH - BID RESULTS I AWARD 1999 WATERLINE PROJECT PHASE 1 OVERLAND ROAD TO EAGLE ROAD AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: All Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ~ r)/ ~, ( Ct~J V ~J/ ~ ~~ ( RECEIVED AUG 1 3 1999 CITY OF NIERIDIAN To: Mayor Corrie/City Council From: Brad Watson, P~E. cc: Gary Smith, PEt File Date: 08/13/99 Re: 1999 Waterline Project Phase I - Overland Road to Eagle Road Attached is a bid summary letter and bid tabulation from our consultant, JUS Engineers, on the second portion of the Phase I water line project We respectfully request this item be placed on the August 17, 1999 City Council agenda for consideration under Gary Smith's department reports. JUS Engineers has reviewed all bids submitted for arithmetic and bid document compliance. The Public Works Department recommends that the contract for this project be awarded to Brown Construction in the amount of $152,516.25. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. p~ From the desk of... . Page 1 BmdW~P.E. Assistant city Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 200 E. Carlton Sl, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642.2600 (208) 887-2211 Fax: (208) 887..1297 Watsonb@cimeridian.idus , - - (.~ . ~. . ~ d.~'U~:B,~ ': ' -. ~~ August 13, .1999 ,( . J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. E~G,INEERS · SURVEYoRs · PLANNERS 250 .'South ~chwood Avenue, Suite 201 .Boise, Idaho 83709-0944 208-376-7330 FAX: 208-323-9336 ., , Mr. Brad Watso~'''P.E~ . , Department ~f ~.ublic .Works _City of Meridl~n ~ . . , 200 'E., 'Carlt(jn'Avenue~ Suite .100 Meridian;:'ID :.83642 ~JBIVED ' AUG1 3 1999 , . , MERIQIANCITlENGlNEER . . " RE: _ . 1999 Waterline Project - Phase 1 . Oy~.rland Road to. ~agle Ro.ad - ,Bi.d Summary and Award: " . ) '. - -. Dear Mr.' Wa~on'~ -:. - \ f... . o~ August~2i 1999,' six (6) bIds were op~ned and read on the above-refere~ced'pr()ject;We "have reviewed the bids' and aU appear tesponsive. , Then:; were sOn1e:minor aiithmet~c errors . that were 'adjuste~ OJ} the attached bid .ta,bulation.. These corrections did. not affect the apparent lo~'-bidd~r~ Bidding r~sults-are summarized b~loW and, for a Ii1pr~.detailed' 'brea~.down, _a;b~d ~abulation is enclosed. -. Engineer's Estimate. . Bro\Vn Construction Inc. Bitterroot Construction Int. Barry A. Gunn Construction Inc. . OWyhee Construction Inc. Lurre Construction, Inc. T.A. Dibble Excavation Inc. S 224,241.41 $ 152,516.25 S 1 n, 736~'45 S 1951307.98 (adjusted from $195,707.60) S 199,339.00 < . S 215,810.00 $ 238,051.50' (adjusted from 238,051.00) It appears, that Brown.Col1struction Inc., of Nampa, Idaho, is the apparent low bidder and, correspondingly, we recommend Notice of Award be iss'ued. Attached. for the mayor's signature, please find three (3) copies of the Notice of Award. Please return all three copies to our office, and we will assemble the contract doc;uments an9 transmit to the Contractor. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, J,-U-B ENGINilEE~. ' _Inc. . ' . ~ , . . ,'--- Phillip H... nchb.aulTI,' Project Engineer .,.- . I PHK: lhe Enclosures f:\J>~()j~~\ 115W\admin\overland to eagle cityaward. doc , I ~ ~ 40..... ."~~,~- , -. , J i I - ~.. .... .; _' ~ .. ~ ~ . " " '.., 'I - I . 1 . ~ .r ~ ~ . ;. ~. .... "c@ Vi ...., c: - G.J E ~ 2 c. E ~- ~ G.J cw. fa 1&.1 o ...., -c 0::: -0 c: fG 1: ~ . ~ 0' I- 0.. ~~ 1: i ~~ o ~~ u~ 88888~~888888888~888880 ~ggg~~~~~g2~8g~~g~~2g2g0o. U~~~~OMO~~~O~N~ ~ ~~~~~~ _c~ N~~N~~~~~N ~ ~~~ ~ ~ "'if ~ co c~ ~ 00 ~ ~~ N 2 1;: c o U ~ ~ u ~~ -I,fJ 1: ::) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 88888~~88888g888~88888 ~OdM~~~~d~~gg~~~~2g2dg ~---- ~qNN~"g:""~qNLt\~~a1 ~ ~ 0,) "'if 1;; ::J =6' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~G 8~88888888888888888888 2~~g~~i22~g~~g~~8~~2gg ~~~N--~~V~VMV~N""~M~~~~__ ~~~~M~g~t~ ~ ~~ ~M g ~ -1: ~ ~<<i - ,fJ ~~ ~ ~ Z GI :e u 01: . ~ <,fJ "':1: ::) 0 ~ ~ ~ ...... In In 0 0 co" 00 ... M ,.., N N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8~88888888~88888888888 ~~~d~~~N~~~~Og~N8~~8.~8. NN--....--MOVNV~N~~MO~~~....~ o ....: ~ 00 00 ~ S fti M '" C ::J 04 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~ ~8~~~8~888888888888888~ ~g~~~~~g~~~~~~~g~~~ggg~ MN~....~~O~N"~N~__O~~~~__~ M N -- ~ ~ .. v ~ ~ ~ M ~ M" 00 M" r--. r--. .. r--. 'I""" g ~ -"C ~ c- o ro Bo ~f- c o u 8 ~ '-"C .!~ ,fJ ,fJ me ::> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~8~~~~O~88~88888888888 ~~~MMci~~~~~~~~2~~~~ggg N" N~--O O::~-....N ,," ~... ; M 00 M M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,fJ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ::> U c: - o ~ ~ ~gg~~~6~~--~~--~~--~-~-~ Vi c: o ----- u " G.J .... IG E ';p '" ILl GI :; " G.J .z;, U "" " CD ~ ~ ~ g Vi fG ~~m c: ~ ~"ii UD::: ::!~ NN N~ 0...1IJ"l IIJ"l i-- GI "5 'i s:;, u en "'C a:i 4f :a a:I aQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~[~~~ 8 1IJ"l~~~~~~~~5c ~u ~~~~~~~~::>~~ lE ~,fJgD:::~~~~~~m~ ~e~S ~ -t'3c 4f 4f ::J ::J ::J :s ::J as -t ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ co ~u~~~~~ - ~_o ~ "C ::Ir;.J2:.... I: "t:I ~ >,fJ-_> ~~"t:I~-N""NM~~> GI~~ ~gi~~~~~~i~~~~~~b~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~j ---N--N-NM-____NM___ _ ~~~j~~~~~jj~~~~~~j~~ ~"..~..~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ijij~ij~RS~~ - N N c ~ '- ! ru IXI~ c: ~ U ~ GI .2; ::J U &n -- N 0... ~