HomeMy WebLinkAboutBentley Apartments RZ 02-009
February 3, 2003
MERIDIAN PLANNING 8< ZONING MEETING
APPLICANT Tamura and Associates
RZ 02-009
February 6, 2003
ITEM NO.
15
REQUEST Public Hearing - Request for a Rezone of 0.17 acres from R-8 to O-T zones for Bentley
Apartments - 518 East Broadway Avenue
AGENCY
COMMENTS
CITY CLERK:
CITY ENGINEER:
CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY POLICE DEPT:
CITY FIRE DEPT:
CITY BUILDING DEPT:
CITY WATER DEPT:
CITY SEWER DEPT:
CITY PARKS DEPT:
MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT:
SANITARY SERVICES:
ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT:
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH:
NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION:
SETTLERS' IRRIGATION:
IDAHO POWER:
INTERMOUNTAIN GAS:
OTHER:
Contacted: lV\. 0.., ~ ,r~h 0 U\.
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
See Attached Comments
'RttDM N\V\ck../
~P(OV~
+0
Glu
See Attached Comments
Date:cR{5-D3 Phone: {Wg,.;295! i/ ~
Materials presented at pubHc meetings shall become properly of /he City of Mertellan.
-0 -r-. ,",,-
i\'b~>t;ETVEri
;EB - 3 2003
'~jty OfMeridi
CIty Clerk om:
· Request for a Rezone of Property Located at 518 E. Broadway A venue from
R-8 (Medium Density Residential District) to 0- T (Old Town), by Tamura
and Associates (File No. RZ-02-009).
;VLWOR
HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY
A Good Place to Live
Robert D. Corrie
CITY OF MERIDIAN
33 EAST IDAHO
MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 . PAX (208) 887-4813
City Clerk Office Pax (208) 888-4218
CIIT COUNCIL MEMBERS
Keith Bird
Tammy deWeerd
Cherie McCandless
William L. M. Nary
MEMORANDUM:
To:
Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission
Dave McKinnon, Planner II }j.A cd
Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech ~
Bentley Apartments
From:
Re:
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 Pax 288-2501
PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211. Pax 887-1297
PL",,'lNING ,",,'lD ZONING
DEPARTMENT
(208) 884-5533 . Pil.." 888-6854
January 16, 2003
· Request for A Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Construction of a Multi-
family Dwelling (Four-Plex) on a piece of property located at 518 E.
Broadway Avenue, in a Proposed Q-T (Old Town) Zone, by Tamura and
Associates (File No. CUP-02-048).
We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as
conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly
modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council:
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The applicant(s), Tamura and Associates, have requested the approval of a rezone of property
located at 518 E. Broadway Avenue from R-8 to O-T in order to accommodate a request for a
conditional use permit to allow the construction of a four-plex on the property. The property is
depicted as Old Town on the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map, and the development
of land in the Old Town Zoning District requires a conditional use permit for the proposed multi-
family use.
The proposed four-plex building will be 3,884 square feet and will be two stories tall, with two
units on the first floor and two on the second floor. Parking for the proposed development will be
provided off of the alley on the north side of the building. The applicant has proposed 8 parking
stalls (2 per unit) for the project, 4 covered stalls, two uncovered compact stalls and two
additional uncovered stalls arranged in a tandem parking arrangement behind the compact stalls.
The proposed project site has a total area of 7,320 square feet (0.172 acres) and if approved, the
density for this project will be approximately 26 units per acre. The existing single family home
will be removed and replaced with parking, drainage, landscaping, sprinkler system, lighting,
and the four-unit townhouse building.
CUP-OZ-04&,RZ-02-009
Bentley ApanmenLs.RZ. CUP
Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council
January 21,2003
Page 2
LOCATION
The subject property, 518 E Broadway Avenue, is located on the north side of Broadway,
approximately halfway between E. 5th Street and E. 6th Street.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
North: Single-family residential, zoned R-8.
South: Industrial property, zoned I-L.
East: Multi-family residential (four-plex) zoned R-8.
West: Multi-family residential (four-plex) zoned R-8.
CURRENT OWNERS OF RECORD
Teresa Bentley is the current owner of the subject property and she has submitted an affidavit of
legal interest to allow the applications to be submitted for her property.
STANDARDS FOR ZONING AMENDMENT
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate
evidence answering the following questions about the proposed zoning amendment (11-15-
11):
A. Will the new zoning be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive
Plan and. if not, has there been an application for a Comprehensive plan
amendment;
Staff finds that the requested Old Town (O-T) zoning designation is in accord with the
Comprehensive P lan's Future Land Use Map which delineates the subject property as
"Old-Town". The text of the Comprehensive Plan (page 99) supports the construction of
multi-family uses within the O-T zone.
B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be re-zoned in the future;
Staff finds that the proposed re-zone and accompanying development plans comply with
the requested zone and Staff does not anticipate that the property will be rezoned in the
future.
C. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be developed in the
fashion that would be allowed under the new zoning;
Staff finds that the applicant has submitted detailed development plans for the property as
part of this application, and that the proposed development may be allowed with the
approval ofa conditional use permit in the proposed O-T zone.
D. Has there been a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the
area should be rezoned;
CUP.Q2-04B, RZ..o2.009
Bentley ApDtmcnts.RZ. CUP
Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council
January 21, 2003
Page 3
Staff finds that the recent adoption of the City's new Comprehensive Pan has provided
the applicant with the ability to request the 0- T zone for the subject property. Staff finds
that there have been no physical changes in the area that dictate how the property should
be rezoned.
E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be
harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character
of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of
the same area;
Staff finds that the proposed development is designed in a manner that will be
harmonious with and appropriate in appearance with the existing neighborhood (four-
plexes) and intended character of the area. Staff finds that additional architectural
features could be added to the southern elevation of the building to give the proposed
building a more attractive street appearance.
F. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses;
Staff finds that the requested rezone should not be disturbing to existing or future
neighboring uses. Specific uses allowed (either permitted uses or conditional uses) within
the 0- T zone may be disturbing to future or existing neighbors; however staff anticipates
that the proposed development should not be hazardous or disturbing to the neighboring
uses. The Commission and Council should carefully consider all public testimony, oral
and written, before making this finding.
G. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as
highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,
water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed
conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such service;
Staff finds that the proposed uses will be adequately served by all essential public
services and facilities.
H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities
and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community;
Stafffinds that the requested uses will not create excessive additional requirements at
public costs for public facilities and services. Additionally, staff finds that the proposed
rezone would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
I. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions that
will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of
excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors;
CUP-02-04S, RZ-02.009
Bentley Apartmcnts.RZ. alP
Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council
January 21,2003
Page 4
Staff finds that the proposed 0- T zoning designation of the property does not inherently
allow uses that will generate activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions
that are detrimental to the general welfare of the community.
J. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to
create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets;
Staff finds that the proposed 0- T zoning will not interfere with general traffic patterns on
any public streets.
K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of
major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed
by approval of this rezone.
L. Is the proposed zoning amendment in the best interest of the City;
Staff finds that the proposed rezone would be in the best interest of the City by allowing a
property owner to make improvements to the property that would otherwise not be
allowed without the rezone.
STANDARDS FOR CONDffiONAL USES
The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each
proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if
they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3):
A. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open
spaces, parking landscaping and other features as may be required by this
ordinance;
Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the requested use
and all required features only if the Commission and Council approve of the proposed
tandem parking and reduced buffers between land uses. Staff has reviewed the proposed
reductions for landscaping and parking and fmds that because the project is in a proposed
0- T zone, where higher densities and mixed uses are encouraged, that the proposed
reductions are appropriate.
B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious with the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance;
As noted earlier in the report, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the
property as "Old Town", in hannony with the requested O-T zoning designation.
C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance will be compatible with
other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character
CUP-02-048, RZ-OUJ09
Bentley Apartitll:'nlS.RZ. CUP
Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council
January 21,2003
Page 5
of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential
character of the same area;
Staff finds the design concept to be compatible with the other (adjacent) multi-family
uses in the general neighborhood and the existing/intended character of the area.
Staff also finds that the proposed improvements would bring the property closer to the
intended character of the area by replacing the existing small residential structure with a
new, higher density residential use.
D. That the proposed use, if it complies with aU conditions of the approval imposed,
will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity;
Staff does not anticipate that the proposed project will have an adverse impact on the
surrounding property; however, the Commission and Council should consider any
testimony given at the public hearings before making this finding.
E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services such as highways, street, police, and flJ"e protection, drainage structures,
refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of
proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services;
Staff finds that the proposed development will be adequately served by the essential
public facilities and services listed above, if improvements are made by the applicant in
accordance with existing policies, ordinances and Uniform Codes.
F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public
cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community;
Staff finds that the proposed improvements would not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community, nor would they create the need for any new facilities or
services to be paid for by the public.
G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment,
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or
general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes,
glare or odors;
Staff finds that no excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors will result from
the proposed use.
H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shaH be
so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public
streets;
CUP-02.048,az.02-009
Benllcy Aparun:nts.RZ. CUP
Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council
January 21,2003
Page 6
Staff finds that the proposed use will not create significant interference with any traffic
on the surrounding public streets, if street and parking improvements are designed in
conformance with ACHD requirements. Parking access is taken off the alley, not from
Broadway.
I. That the proposed use will not result iD the destruction, loss or damage of a natural,
scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance.
Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed
by issuance of this conditional use.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
1. Tandem Parking: The proposed project includes four (4) tandem (one in front of the
other) parking stalls and four covered parking spaces under a carport. The Commission
and Council recently approved tandem parking for another four-plex in the O-T zone
(Thornton four-plex).
The proposed tandem parking configuration for this project differs from the one approved
last year because this project requests approval of two compact stalls within the tandem
parking and by not providing any c overed parking for the tandem parking stalls. Staff
does not object to the proposed compact stalls. However staff has concerns with the
tandem parking configuration based on the assumption that each apartment will have one
covered parking stall, and then the tandem parking would be a free for all between the
tenants, resulting in the blocking of another tenants car. The Commission and City
Council should determine whether the proposed tandem parking configuration is
acceptable as proposed.
2. Landscaoe Buffers: By the letter of the ordinance, a five foot (5') wide landscape buffers
is required along the perimeter of the property wherever parking or traffic circulation is
adjacent to the property line. The proposed four-plex design provides only three feet (3')
of landscaping between the parking and the adjacent properties. Given the higher density,
mixed use nature of the Old Town area in which this project is located, staff supports the
produced reduction in landscape buffers between lots. The Commission should determine
if the proposed reduction in landscaping is appropriate for the proposed use in the
proposed 0- T zone.
3. Sidewalks: The applicant has proposed a 3\1, foot wide sidewalk along the western
property line (running north and south) of the subject lot to provide access from the
parking lot, located offthe alley, to the front doors ofthe four-plex and to connect to new
and existing sidewalk on Broadway Avenue. The proposed sidewalk dead-ends into the
western "compact" tandem parking stall, and does not provide access to the other parking
stalls. Staff recommends extending the sidewalk to the north and to the east, in "front" of
the other parking stalls, so that the people parking in the stalls will not have to walk
across the landscaping to get to the sidewalk. Furthermore staff recommends that the
CUP-02-04B. RZ-02-009
Bendey A)JIlI1TD:nts.RZ. CUP
Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council
January 21,2003
Page 7
internal sidewalk be widened to five feet (5') in width. Please see site specific conditions
of approval number 8 below.
4. Mitigation of Existing Trees: The application indicates the removal of a large existing
tree in order to accommodate the tiling of an irrigation canal on the northern boundary of
the property. MCC 12-13-13-6 requires mitigation for all existing trees removed, unless
the trees are deemed unhealthy or a hazard by the City Arborist. Given space limitations
and reasons for removal, full mitigation may be impossible or unnecessary.
SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Sanitary sewer and water service to this site will be provided via existing mains adjacent
to the project site.
2. Assessments for sewer and water service are determined during the building permit
application process.
3. In accordance with MCC ll-13-4.B.2, underground year-round pressurized irrigation
must be provided to all landscape areas on site. Applicant shall submit irrigation
performance specifications based on the proposed landscaping when applying for a
Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing
surface or well water for the primary source, if existing. I f City water is proposed for
irrigation, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the landscaped
areas.
4. Landscaoing: Per MCC 11-13-4.B.1 and MCC 12-13 landscaping is required on site for
all multi-family residences. The Applicant is proposing several (2) two-inch caliper trees,
lawn, and shrubs and staff finds that this meets the basic requirements of the ordinances.
A detailed landscape plan, in accordance with the Landscape Ordinance will be required
at the time CZC submission. All trees must be kept outside of the public right-of-way.
The applicant is responsible to ensure that no easements exist that would preclude the
proposed landscaping.
5. Fencing: The proposed 6 foot vinyl fencing located on the east and west property line
shall be reduced to three feet (3') within twenty feet (20') of the north or south property
line in accordance with the MCC.
6. Applicant shall coordinate with Sanitary Services Corporation (SSC) regarding the
location and design of the trash enclosure area. Submit details and written approval with
a Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. The Trash enclosure shall be
incompliance with section 11-12-I.C of the MCC.
7. Significant alteration of elevations approved as part of the conditional use permit will not
be considered without modification of the conditional use permit and additional public
hearings.
8. The internal sidewalk shall be widened to five feet in width and shall be extended to the
CUP..02-048, RZ-01-009
Beruley Apartl11llnts.RZ CUP
Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council
January 21,2003
Page 8
north and east to provide access to all of the parking stalls proposed for this development.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF AffROV AL
1. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the City of Meridian Zoning and
Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements.
2. Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of
Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
3. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required
and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking
areas. All drainage water is to be maintained on-site. Storm water treatment and disposal
must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997
publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and
Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off-site disposal into surface
water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream
provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is
responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water
Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells.
4. Outside lighting, whether attached to the principal building or located within the parking
lot shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential
areas or the traveling public in accordance with the MCC.
5. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Ordinance 11-14 or as
specifically approved. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be
permitted.
6. Per Ordinance 11-17-4.B., a conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a
maximum period of eighteen (18) months unless otherwise approved by the City Council.
During this time, the permit holder must acquire building permits and commence the
construction of permanent footings or structures. Time extensions are allowed per the
ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested rezone and conditional use permit, with the
conditions noted above.
CUP-02-04B, RZ-02-009 Bentley ApanllV:llls.RZ. CUP
MAYOR
ROBERTD. CORRIE
CoUNCIL MEMBERs
WIlllAML.M. NARY
KErrnBIRD
TAMMY DE WEERD
CHERIE MCCANDLESS
RURAL FIRE COMMISSIONERS
RICHARD GREENE
TERRY LEIGHTON
STEVE ELLIOTI
CBIEF
KEN W. BOWERS
DEPUTY CHlEF - FIRE PREVENTION
JOSEPH SILVA
j
~;;di!C"
'>
~ IDAHO j'
:l<-,.
~5"1- V~ -t
....~- !,~ i\NI
MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT
DEPUTY CHIEF - TRAINING
BILL JOHNSON
540 East PrankIin Road
Meridian, III 83642
(208) 888- I 234
Pax (208) 895-0390
-=,''''~''''''''''''......,.
'-"""""'~'~>""",,,,,.,
RECElVED''''~~~'
JAN 2 7 2003 .
City Of Meridian
City Clerk Office
Mayor, City Council and Meridian Planning & Zoning COrnnlission
January 27, 2003
TO:
FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention
SUBJECT: Bentley Apartments RZ 02-009, CUP 02-048
The following will be the requirements to provide minimum levels of fire protection for the
proposed proj ect:
1. The project shall have a fire-flow as required by the Uniform Fire Code for four 4-
plex buildings. This is estimated to be a fi.re-flow of 1,750 gallons per minute
available for a duration of 2 hours to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall
be placed an average of350' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix III-A
2. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required
before combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3
3. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water
Department.
4. Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire
Department.
5. The addresses shall be posted in 6" numbers on the street side of the building &
small unit numbers shall be posted on each entry door.
Joint School District No.2
911 Meridian Road. Meridian, Idaho 83642 . (208) 855-4500 . Fax (208) 888-6700
SUPERINTENDENT
Christine H. Donnell
RECEIVED
JAN 1 0 2003
January 7,2003
City of Meridian
City Clerk Office
City of Meridian
33 East Idaho
Meridian, Idaho 83642
Dear Planners:
The Meridian School District has experienced phenomenal student growth the last ten
years. The high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools throughout the district
are operating over capacity.
Approval of Bentlev Aoartments will have a significant impact on school enrollments at
Meridian Elementary. Meridian Middle. and Meridian High School.
Additional students will further compound the current overcrowded situation. Residents
cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school, as it may be necessary to bus
students to other schools across the district.
School capacity is addressed in Idaho Code 67-6508. The Meridian School District is
currently operating beyond capacity. Future development will continue to have an impact
on the district's capacity. If you have any questions, please contact me at 888-670 I.
Sincerely,
~9/
Supervisor of Facilities and Construction
/
MAYOR
Robert D. Corri~
'"
..~~,~~-,,,
"'.~~'
..~~."~
jo.1.~F.1r:; ,.
olfe;;dl;~J~k; \,
'IDAHO /:
~b/
.,,1' ~,~r--/
, ~TRF"'<;lrRFV ~INCE
',1903
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888-]579 . Fax 898-550 I
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 -Fax 887-] 21)7
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208)887.2211.Fax SS7-1:!9?
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-;533 . Fax 888-6854
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(108) 288':!499 . Fax !88-:!50 I
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWcerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning
and Zoning Commission, please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Clerk's Office
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: January 30, 2003
Transmittal Date: December 27,2002 Hearing Date: February 6,2003
File No.: RZ 02-009
Request: Request for a Rezone of 0.17 acres from R-8 to O. T zones for Bentley
Apartments
By: Tamura and Associates
Location of Property or Project: 518 East Broadway Avenue
City .of' Meridian
City Clerk Office
33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433' Fax (208) 887-4813 . City Clerk Office Pax (208) 888-4218 . Hum"" Resources Pax (208) 288-1193
GB CENTRAL
.. DISTRICT
r"~h8k!~
CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Environmental Health Division
RECEIVED
R Cc)'l-OO'} JANIS 2003
(1_ ut (J C:>a-... -EJt[ Velf)' nf Meridian.
City Clerk Offic~
Return to:
o Boise
DEagle
o Garden City
t@Mendian
o Kuna
DACZ
o Star
Rezone #
Conditional Use #
Preliminary / Final/Short Plat
~.~ H~ A-pt.
~ We have No Objections to this Proposal.
o 2. We recommend Denial of this Proposal.
o 3. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal.
o 4. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment.
o 5. Before we can comment conceming individual sewage disposal, we will require more data conceming the depth ot
o high seasonal ground water 0 waste flow characteristics
o or bedrock from original grade 0 otiter
o 6. This office will require a study to assess the impact of nubients and pathogens to receiving ground waters ancl/or
surface waters.
o 7. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and
water availability.
o 8. After written approval from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for:
o central sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water well
o interim sewage 0 central water
o individual sewage 0 individual water
o 9. The following plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare,
Division of Environmental Quality:
o cemral sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water
o sewage dry lines 0 central water
o 10. Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem.
o 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other
considerations indicate approval.
o 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State
Sewage Regulations.
o 13. We will require plans be submitted for a pian review for any:
o food establishment 0 swimming pools or spas
o beverage establishment 0 grocery store
o child care center
014.
Date: LJ 13 /~
Reviewed By: ~r/~t5JU
Review Sheet
COH09/0Dlkc
., '-'i'!f\rrW~{l1i'--:-L~'::::'"
PUBLIC HEARiNG
SIGN-UP SHEET
RECEIVED
FEB - 6 2003
CITY OF MERIDlAl'l
PROJECT NUMBER
February 6, 2003
RZ 02-009
DATE
PROJECT NAME
Bentley Apartments
NAME FOR AGAINST
tflmt.;1=/./ 'P1J.;';I:,$ '--;{
'-~ ~/LLd?- J -\J;-J-d... j X
"'!-
,