HomeMy WebLinkAboutSilverleaf Sub VAR 03-006
MAYOR
Robert D. Corrie
.
~.
Dlfer.C,T7YdOFlâ..Itn' ,'" "\
-#' ;:,
V
~.ßJ
,,\'18!
.
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
(208) 288-2499 - Fax 288-2501
PARKS & RECREATION
(208 888-3579 - Fax 898-5501
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Tammy deWeerd
William L. M. Nary
Cherie McCandless
Keith Bird
PUBLIC WORKS
(208) 898-5500 -Fax 887-1297
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
(208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297
PLANNING AND ZONING
(208) 884-5533' Fax 888-6854
TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMEN I PROJI::G 1:S
WITH THE CITY OF MERIDIAN
To insure that your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian City
Council please submit your comments and recommendations to Meridian City Hall
Attn: Will Berg, City Clerk, by: February 25, 2003
Transmittal Date: February 7,2003 Hearing Date: March 4, 2003
File No.: VAR 03-006
Request: Variance to exceed 1,000 foot maximum block length and Variance to open
space requirement for proposed Silverleaf Subdivision
By: Crestline Development, LLC
Location of Property or Project: 2683 West Chinden Boulevard
David Zaremba, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Jerry Centers, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Michael Rohm, P/Z (NoVAR,VAC,FP)
Keith Borup, P/Z (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Robert Corrie, Mayor
Bill Nary, CIC
Tammy deWeerd, CIC
Keith Bird, CIC
Cherie McCandless, CIC
Water Department
Sewer Department
Sanitary Service (No VAR, VAC, FP)
Building Department
Fire Department
Police Department
City Attomey
City Engineer
City Planner
Parks Department
Meridian School District (NoFP)
Meridian Post Office (FP/PPonly)
Ada County Highway District
Community Planning Assoc.
Central District Health
Nampa Meridian Irrig. District
Settlers Irrigation District
Idaho Power Co. (FP/PPonIy)
U.S. West (FP/PPonIy)
Intermountain Gas (FP¡PP only)
Bureau of Reclamation (FPIPPonIy)
Idaho Transportation Department (NoFP)
Ada County (AZonIy)
Ada County Assess. land Records (FP/PPonIy)
Meridian Development Corporation
Historical Preservation Commission
Your Concise Remarks:
33 EAST IDAHO' MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642
(208) 888-4433 - Fax (208) 887-4813 . City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 . Human Resources Fax (208) 288-1193
CITY OF MERIDIAN .
Planning & Zoning Department
660 E, Watertower Ln., Ste. 202, Meridian, ID 83642
(208) 884-5533 Phone I (208) 888-6854 Fax
.
~-IJOh
VARIANCE APPLICATION
(RE: Meridian Zoning Ordinance-1l-18, Meridian Subdivision Ordinance- 12-11)
FOR SILVERLEAF SUBDMSION
APPLICANT: Crestline Develooment. LLC
ADDRESS: 114 E. Idaho Ave Suite 230 Meridian. Idaho 83612
PHONE: 895-8858
FAX:
895-0714
E-MAIL:
OWNER(S) OF RECORD:
Donald E and Jean S Hobbs
ADDRESS:
2683 W. Cbinden Road. Meridian. Idaho
PHONE:
FAX:
E-MAIL:
ENGINEER, SURVEYOR, PLANNER: Shawn 1. Nickel. Land Coosultants Inc.
ADDRESS:
52 N. 2nd Street. E8!tle. Tm.hn 83616
PHONE:
938-3812
FAX:
938-5873
E-MAIL: shawn@landconsultants.net
ADÙRESS, GENERAL LOCATION OF SITE: 2683 W. Chinden Road. Meridian-west of Linder Road
PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION: RUT CR1Iral Urban Transition)
PRESENT USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
V scant
PROPOSED USE OF SUBJEct PROPERTY: Proposed Silver1ea.f Subdivision sincle famìlv res.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE: Variance to Section 12-4-5 oftbe Meridian Subdivision
Ordinance requirin2 blocks to ~ not less than 400' and not more than 1.000' in length. Variance to Section
13-2 reœrdil1l¡ minimum o.pen s!JSœ reauirements.
I have read the infonnatìon contained herein and certifY the ~ and correct
Signature of Applicant: Y-- .I
Rei'. 06/15/01
c~ OF VARIANCE APPUCAn8-
(Incomplete applications will not be proœssed)
The Council shall not grant a variance from the terms of this Ordinance unless and until a written
application for a variance is submitted to the Administrator and the Council. The application shall
contain the following information:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Completed and signed application fann.
Proof of title of said owner (wamurty deed).
Notarized consent ftom titled owner of property. (If owner is a corporation, provide a copy of the
Articles of Iocorporation or other evidence to show that the person signing is an authorized
representative).
Legal description of subject property.
Provide a written statement - what ordinance can you not comply with?
Provide a written statement - what prevents compliance with the ordinance?
Provide a written statement - what are the minimum requirements of this ordinance that need
to be reduced to pennit the proposed use?
Provide a written statement. what is the difficulty or hardslùp that would result if requirements
of this ordinance were applied to the subject property?
Provide a written statement - any unusual or peculiar circumstances that indicate regulations of
this ordinance that should not be strictly complied with?
10.
Provide a written statement that special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar
to the land, structure or buildings involved which are not applicable to other lands, structures
or buildings in the same district.
11.
Provide a written statement that a literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance shall
deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under
terms of this Ordinance.
12.
Provide a written statement that special conditions or circumstances exist that was not a result
of the applicant's action.
13.
Provide a written statement that granting the variance requested shall not confer on the
applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures or
building8 in the same district.
14.
Provide a written statement of how the granting of the variance would convenience the
applicant and how the applicant would profit therefTom, which statement shall also
represent whether profit and convenience is the sole reason why the variance is requested.
15.
Provide a written statement regarding the relationship of the proposed variance to the Meridian
Comprehensive Plan
2
Rev. 06/J5!Ol
16.
17.
18.
20.
21.
.
.
One (1) copy ofa scalable 8 ~ x 11 site plan showing property lines, streets, etc.
One (I) copy of a vicinity map at a scale of one (1) inch equals three hundred (300) feet,
that includes surrounding zonings, streets, etc.
If applicable, schematic building plans which indicate typical elevation and floor plan of any
proposed construction.
19.
A list of the mailing addresses of all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the
external boundaries of the land being considered. This list l!mt be obtained ITom the City of
Meridian Planning & Zoning Department. Please request list seven days prior to submitting
application.
A fee established by the Council:
Variance = $310.00
A signed affidavit stating that the property will be posted by the applicant 1 week before the
public hearing. Posting must contain name of applicant, description of variance, and time and
date of public hearing. Official notices are available at the Planning & Zoning Department or at
City Hall.
22.
After the property has been posted, the applicant shall deliver to the Zoning Administrator a
notarized statement that he has posted the property and the date the posting was placed.
ReI'. 06115101
. .... . . ..
. --
. ..
improvememsassóciated with a development request will beneftt the þllbIiQhea1th,~;or welfare.- -
That rightwoúld be compromised by a literalwer¡)retationofthe law. ~ditiOpa\lý,thecol1ditions. -
. that exist (lack of acçessto ChIDden, location ofexisi:íngstub streetconnectiOIlS ÍU1.Bdesiresofthe -
- school district regãrdingdesign)adjacent to and iilthearea oftheprop~aœnotnec~ssarily -
conditions that exist as a result of the applicant's own actions. Further, grantiIlgthe ymancew()wd
. _maintain rights, which would be afforded, to others in the same situation. Many pfevì~ssubdivisions
in the city have been granted simi1ar variance requests with simi1ar cirCUltlStânces that exist on this . - ..
property., The variance would convenience the applicant" but to provide for the säìneability to develop
the land with the specified limitations that other'property owners in the district could achievewithòut~ -
such variances..' The variance would not constitute any special privilegefortheproperty oWnerthat .
could not be sought by owners ofother land; The granting of the requested.variance will notbe. -..
detrimental to the Public's welfure or injuriousto other property in the area of the proposed plat. If
approved, the granting of the variance would not be in conflict with the mtel1tòfthe Meridian ....~
Comprehensive Plan, which recognizes. among other things, that certain cirGumstancesexist, artd thJit
- 1aiI.â deVelopment regulations shall be revised ftomtime to time. --
It is the opiniOn of the applicant that the literal interpretation of the provisiorts ófthe ordiIJance Would.~
deprive the applicant rights because the developmefu of the property Would bedifficu1t ifllo flexibility
on open space minimums were allowed. An applicant has a right to eXpect that arty and all required .
improv'ementsassociated with a deve1opmentrequest will benefit thé public health, Safety, or we~;; -
That right would be compromised bya literal interpretätion of thelsw, Additiona11y,tlieconditions:'jc
that exist (the!!Chooi district intentions ofusing a portion of the propertyforafututesêlfool Site) . -; --
adjacentto and in the area of the property are oo1IlecessarilyconditionSthate)¡ist$1fresuitof the
applicant's own actions. Further, granting the variance would maintainrights,whichwo.uld be.. .-
afforded, to othetS ufthe same situation. Patkcredits; open space requiremenfconcessions and --
dedications to public entities have always beènatypica1 part ofnegotiatiolls.practices~ agencies
and developers. Previous developments in the city haVe been granted similar vaiiånce requests with
similar circumsta.l1ces that exist on this property. The variancewou1dconveniencetheapplicant, buno-
provide for the same ability to develop the land with the specified 1imitationsthat other property .
oWners in the district could achieve without such variances. The variance would not constituteS!!)'
special privilege for the property owner that could not be sought by owners of other land. The -
. granting of the requested variance will not be detrimental to the Pllblic's welfare ör injurious to other .
. .
- --
The appli.cantisrequesting the varialwetQ Section13-2 of the Landscapeordiß-ancetoallowthe .
. reduction of thee five percent common area requirementIor the subdivision. Jt is the intent of the
developer to donate approximately I.I 7 acres of the proposed school site to theSch()çlDiStrict for.
future open area in order to bring the usable open space within thedevelopmentto therequired5% .
minimum. The hardship that exists with this property thai would enable the applicant ftoIllcomplying .
with therequiremeíits in the Ordinance is that with the School District needing this area for a future
school site, the configuration of the property changes and the total area all()\\ledforâevelopmentìs . .
reduced; Rather than having individual "pocketparks"Jocatedin the subjeCìdevelopme1it that inayor .
may not actuallybeusab1e,it appears that being adjacent to a future school site would provide .
residents of this subdivision with ample public open space area to uti!izefut reCreation. By donatilig
the 1.17 acres that the developer lacks to maintain the required 5% area, the school is bell.e¡ìtingftomc~-
the overall purchase price of the property,andthe development is pròvided with future open space by
. way of the schooL .
....
Ig
1l~1212002 14: 03 FAX 2088886854.
g I
MERIDIAN P&Z DEPT.
I
0
I
---1
c.>
0
'0
~
0
tD
0
0
.....
en
<:>
<:>
.."
(þ
~
:;:
~.z
'"
.
~
@OOJ
L
::r<
(")
Z
-uDJ-j
§jcn-<
~-cS
Z:;c»
I G) 0 '"'C
~-c-->..
» m =
-< :::c 1/
~~
-~
.
.
AFFIDAVIT OF (FUTURE) POSTING OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
FOR
SILVERLEAF SUBDIVISION
I, Shawn L. Nickel, of Land Consultants, Inc., as authorized representative for
Crestline Development, LLC, do hereby affinn that the said property will be posted one
week prior to the public hearing.
~ -;/~
jVO¡)fA 6<'l. /~ .;lOo.;z
Date
Shawn L. Nickel
Representing Crestline Development, LLC
AcknowIede-ement
STATE of'1ddho
COUNTY OF J1dð...,