Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 3, 2007 C/C Meeting Meridian City Council July 3, 2007 Page 8 of 28 De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second on Item 10 to approve. Any discussion? Mr. Berg, will you, please, call roll. Roll-Call: Bird, yea; Rountree, yea; Zaremba, yea; Borton, absent. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 11: Item 12: Item 13: Item 14: Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2007: PP 07-009 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of 52 residential lots, 2, office/commercial lots and 10 common lots on 19.80 acres in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Villaae North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - Southeast Corner of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: Continued Public Hearing from June 5, 2007: CUP 07-008 Request for a Conditional Use Permit approval to create 52 residential lots, 2 office/commercial lots and 10 common lots in an L-O zone for Meadowlake Villaae North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - Southeast Corner of Franklin Road andTo,~chmark Way: ..' Continued Public Hea.ring from June 5~!'i2007: VAR 07-008 Request for a Variance to UDC 11-6C::3B4 which limits cul-de-sacs to a maximum of 450 feet for Meadowlake Village North by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - Southeast Corner of Franklin Road and Touchmark Way: Continued'P'lIblic Hearing from June 5,:12007: MI 07-006 Request for a Miscellanous application to amend the previously approved Development Agreement for TO/Jchmark Living Center Annexation (AZ 99-021) by amending the approved phase boundaries and various other provisions for M,adowlake iVillaae, Nort~ by Touchmark of the Treasure Valley, LLC - Southeast Corner of Frankhn Road and Touchmark Way: De We~rd: Thank you. It(3ms 11:~it2, 13 and 14 have been requested to be continued to July11!~r . ::::i.~.,. . "ii. 'I' Rountree: AriMpu going to. open them? Bird: Madam Mayor? De Weerd: I opened them last week. Yes, Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we continue PP 07-009, CUP 07-008, VAR 07-008, and MI 07-006 to July 17th, 2007. Rountree: Second. Meridian City Council July 3, 2007 Page 9 of 28 De Weerd: Okay. I have a motion and a second to continue Items 11 through 14 to July 17th. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 15: Continued Public Hearing from June 19, 2007: MI 07-008 Request for a Miscellaneous application to modify the recorded Development Agreement (Inst. 104107406) to remove the requirement for all future uses to obtain Conditional Use Permit approval for Gatewav Marketplace by Landmark Development Group - 3205 East Ustick Road: De Weerd: Okay. I will open up Item 15. It's a continued Public Hearing on MI 07-008, with staff comments. Canning: Madam Mayor, Members of the Council, this is the Gateway Marketplace DA modification. The applicant requests -- well, just to refresh your memory, the Gateway Marketplace is located on the southeast corner of Eaglle and Ustick. ,Here is their proposed site plan. The applicant requests to mqdify their DA to remove the requirement for all future uses on the site to .~btain C~~~!itional use approval. When the property was annexed there was not a specific develop~nt plan proposed, it was only conceptual, and at that time the COUliIcil placed a re~uirement to have a detailed conditional use approval come in for ea:chuse. Because of this -- I'm sorry. Since that time Council has approved a preliminary plat that outlines the building locations as shown here. You have discussed the access points. to Eagle Road and you have discussed utilities, laods~ping, and you will disquss landscaping even farther immediately after this: one. The applicant feels that because of this the CU should no longer be required~' The appli~nt is required to submit a design review application along with each certificate.of zoni09 compliance. So, normally, the -- only the properties immediately aqJoining Eagle.Ro'ad would be required to submit for design review, but through the CoUrse of this pr<l.lject that requirement has been placed on all the buildings. Furthermore, since approval of .the Gateway Marketplace preliminary plat, there are conditi~ns in the DA ..~~~~ are now outdated due to the subsequent approvals or requirel11ef1ts that I have:~;alked about. More specifically, the applicant is requesting to update the i;D~ to reflect approved access point on Eagle Road and the location of the frontage roadljHNhich will ~~ the extension of Allys Way. Staff was supportive of the modifications req~ested by the applicant. We do feel there are enough safeguards in place to get the type and quality of development that Council is looking for. I know that there are some concerns about the drive aisle lengths in getting safe access. We haven't specifically looked at the parking lot layout yet. There hasn't been a certificate of zoning compliance come in, but we will look for those pedestrian connections as part of design review at that time. We have had no additional written testimony since the staff report and to our knowledge there are no outstanding issues before City Council. I will answer any questions you may have. De Weerd: Council, any questions?