HomeMy WebLinkAboutLocust Grove Professional Office AZ-07-004 ALT-07-005 DES-07-002
CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW AND
DECISION & ORDER
~rl~~
.IDAHO
-"
'(,
'&
Jf
l
"'~_r!!!_...;_YtO!!~ .. ml.
In the Matter of the Request for Annexation and Zoning of 2.48 Acres from RUT to L-O,
by Ruby I Edwards: Architecture + Design
Case No(s). AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & DES-07-002
For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 5, 2007 (Findings on the June 19,2007, City
Council agenda)
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 5, 2007,
incorporated by reference)
2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 5, 2007,
incorporated by reference)
3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 5,
2007, incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of June 5, 2007, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975," codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (Le. 967-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code
codified at Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of
Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Amended
Comprehensive- Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted August 6, 2002,
Resolution No. 02-382 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code 9
11-5A.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & DES-07-002
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s) received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not
impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision, which
shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon
the Applicant, the Planning Department, the Public Works Department, and any affected
party requesting notice.
7. That this approval is subject to the Legal Description and the provlSlons of the
Development Agreement contained in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of -
June 5, 2007, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable
and the Applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the
application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code S 11-5A, and
based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby
ordered that:
1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning, as evidenced by having submitted the
legal description and exhibit map stamped and dated February 13, 2007 by Jeffrey H.
McAllister, PLS, is hereby conditionally approved;
2. A Development Agreement is required with approval of the subject rezone and shall
include the provisions noted in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 5,
2007, incorporated by reference; and
3. That the Applicant installs either bollards or cement posts in the southwest corner
of the lot parallel with the entrance to the site.
D. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 5, 2007.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & DES-07-002
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 11-1'~ day of
J~ ,2007.
COUNCIL MEMBER DAVID ZAREMBA
VOTED~
VOTED~
VOTED~
VOTED ~
COUNCIL MEMBER JOE BORTON
COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLIE ROUNTREE
COUNCIL MEMBER KEITH BIRD
TIE BREAKER
MAYOR TAMMY de WEERD
-
VOTED
Copy served upon:
( 8EAL__
ITY CLE~ ~~ "fl.~?
\- ~~ 49r 1S~ . .f? f
" ~'"
y( ~'/,' (\-., b --1 ,...."....
. II .-~'" ",
.. Apphcant III1111 \\\\\'
V III/IJIIO\\
. Plannmg Department
V'" ....Public Works Department
,,/' City Attorney
BK ~J.v-
City Clerk's Office
ATTEST:
Dated:
LD-ZL.Q-QI
CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER
CASE NO(S). AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & DES-07-002
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF ruNE 5, 2007
STAFF REPORT
Hearing Date: June 5,2007
SUBJECT:
Mayor & City Council
Amanda Hess, Associate City Planner
(208) 884-5533
Locust Grove Professional Office
"'-~ /' "N n, ""
"-7Vldridi:n't \
\ IOAHO ~
~ J
t"', l' . VJU).Yo J"
.l!f....._,.3.- ~ (lal
TO:
FROM:
. AZ-07-004
Annexation and Zoning of 2.48 acres from RUT (Ada County) to L-O
(Limited Office District), by Ruby I Edwards: Architecture + Design
. AL T -07 -005
Alternative Compliance for hardscape within the required arterial street
landscape buffers
. DES-07-002
Design Review for an office building totaling 21,000 square feet within the
L-O zone
1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The Applicant, Ruby I Edwards: Architecture + Design, has requested Annexation and Zoning (AZ)
approval of 2.48 acres from RUT (Ada County) to L-O (Limited Office District). Staff also required
application for Design Review for the proposed office building, and alternative compliance to the City's
landscaping requirements.
The subject property is located on the southwest comer of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road in
Section 19, Township 3 North, Range I East, B.M., and is currently referenced as Assessor's Parcel
Number SI119110026. The property is within the City's Area of Impact and Urban Service Planning
Area.
Approval of the subject AZ application would allow the Applicant to obtain an office zone. According to
current City Code, personal and professional services (offices) and clinics are principally permitted uses
in the proposed L-O zone (UDC Table 11-2B-2).
The Applicant has not submitted a subdivision or certificate of zoning compliance application at this time.
However, the Applicant has submitted a concept plan for how the subject property may develop, and
elevations for what the future building will look like. Staff has reviewed both the concept plan and the
elevations and has included DA provisions in the staff report related to all of the submitted applications
(AZ, ALT and DES).
On the submitted conceptual plan, the Applicant has depicted one access to Locust Grove Road. The
driveway is located near the south property line, approximately 440 feet south of the Overland / Locust
Grove intersection. Because the Applicant has not submitted a subdivision or CZC application at this
time, ACHD has not reviewed or approved access to this property yet (to be reviewed with CZC
application in the future).
The Applicant is proposing to make site improvements (landscaping, pathways, etc.) at the time of
submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC). At that time, Planning Staff will require site
improvements in accordance with the Unified Development Code, including but not limited to, parking
and landscaping. Staff has reviewed, as part of ALT-07-005, the proposed landscaping at the comer of
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & ADR-07-002
Page I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
Overland and Locust Grove Roads.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
The subject Annexation and Zoning application was submitted to the Planning Department for review. By
City Ordinance, the Planning & Zoning Commission makes recommendation to the Council on
Annexation and Zoning applications. Any comments related to the Annexation and Zoning application
(AZ-07-004) will be included in the Commission's recommendation to the Council.
The Commission must make a formal recommendation to the Council on the annexation
application. Although it is not on the agenda as a public hearing item, the Commission may also
review and make recommendations regarding the alternative compliance and design review
applications, as these applications are key to the proposed development.
Staff is recommending approval of the Locust Grove Professional Office application (AZ-07-004,
AL T -07-005, & DES-07-002) with a Development Agreement for the project.
The Meridian Planninl! and Zooine Commission heard this proiect on May 3.2007. At the public
hearine. they moved to recommend approval to the City Council.
a. Summary of Public Hearinl!:
i. In favor: Wes Edwards (Applicant's Representative): Charles Eldridge (Developer)
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: Mike Ball (President, Sportsman's Pointe HOA): Gene Dertell
(Neighbor): Mike Bussert (Neighbor)
iv. Written testimonv: None
v. Staff presenting application: Amanda Hess
vi. Other Staff commenting on application: Caleb Hood
b. Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. The allowed uses within the L.O zone and compatibility of those uses with the adiacent
residential subdivision:
11. The hours of operation:
iii. The grading of the property so as not to impact the adiacent residential subdivision: and
IV. The provision of additional landscaping to buffer the adiacent residential subdivision
from the proposed office buildine:.
c. Key Commission Chanl!es to Staff Recommendation:
i. That the hours of operation for the site be from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.: and
ii. That six-foot tall, vinyl perimeter fencing be installed along the west and south property
lines.
d. Outstandinl! Issue(s) for City Council:
1. Resident concerns regarding compatibility of elevations/height with homes to the west.
The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 5. 2007. At the DubHc hearing thev aDDroved
the subiect AZ reouest.
a. Summary of City Council Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Wes Edwards (ADDlicanf~ Reoresentative): Charles Eldridl!e (Develooer)
ii. In oooosition; None
iii. Commentinl!: Mike Ball (President. Sportsman's Pointe HOA): Gene Dertell (Neighbor)
iv. Written testimoIlY~
v. Staff oresentinl! aoolication: Anna Canninl!
vi. Other Staff commentine: on application: NOM
b. Kev Issues of Discussion by Council:
i. The sil!nificant difference in !!radine: from the east propertv line (on Overland Road) to
the west DI:Q~r!y)i!1e.;."agd
ii. A wAY. .Jo safel!Uard the adiacent properties from vehicles from accigentallv drivinl!
~hrough the propertv and in!9__l! Sportsman's Pointe homeQ.~!ler's backYard.
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & ADR-07-002
Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
c. Kev Council ChanR'es to Commission Recommendation:
i. That the Aoolicant installs either bollards or cement oosts in the _S_Quth~est comer of the
lot Darall.el with the entrance to the site.
3. PROPOSED MOTION
Approval
After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to approve File Number AZ-07-
004 (and ALT-07-005 & DES-07-002 optional) as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of
June 5, 2007, with the following modifications to the proposed development agreement: (add any
proposed modifications)
Denial
After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to deny File Number AZ-07-004
(and ALT-07-005 & DES-07-002 optional) as presented during the public hearing on June 5, 2007,
for the following reasons: (you should state specific reasons for denial of the annexation request)
Continuance
After considering all Staff, Applicant, and public testimony, I move to continue File Number AZ-07-
004 (and ALT-07-005 & DES-07-002 optional) to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date
here) for the following reason(s): (you should state specific reason(s) for continuance)
4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location:
1695 S. Locust Grove Road
SWC of Overland Road and Locust Grove Road
Section 19, Township 3 North, Range 1 East
b. Property Owner of Record:
Specialty Contracting
2525 Stokesberry Place, Suite A
Meridian, ill 83642
c. Applicant:
Ruby I Edwards: Architecture + Design
615 W. Hays Street
Boise, ill 83702
d. Representative: Wescott Edwards, Ruby I Edwards: Architecture + Design
e. Present Zoning: RUT (Ada County)
f. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Office
g. Description of Applicant's Request: Annexation of2.48 acres from RUT to L-O
h. Applicant's Statement / Justification: The application is to construct a two-story 21,000 square-
foot office building. The building will be designed to accommodate professional offices and / or
medical offices. Access to the site will be from Locust Grove Road. Parking will exceed that
required by the UDC. All required landscaping will comply with the UDC. (Please see
Applicant's submittal letters for more information)
5. PROCESS FACTS
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07 -004, AL T -07 -005, & ADR -07-002
Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
a. The subject application will, in fact, constitute an annexation as detennined by City Ordinance.
By reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code Title 11 Chapter 5, a public hearing is
required before the City Council on this matter.
b. Newspaper notifications published on:
April 16, 2007, & April 30, 2007 (Planning & Zoning Commission)
May 14. 2007. & May 28.2007 (Citv Council)
c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on:
April 5, 2007 (Planning & Zoning Commission)
May 11. 2007 (City Council)
d. Applicant posted notice on site by:
April 23, 2007 (Planning & Zoning Commission)
Mav 26. 2007 (City Council)
6. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): There is an existing home and outbuildings on the subject site.
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: A highly-trafficked intersection with commercial
/office development proposed at all comers.
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning:
North: Maverick store, zoned C-C
South: Residential (Sportsman's Pointe Subdivision), zoned R-4
East: Vacant land, zoned C- N
West: Residential (Sportsman's Pointe Subdivision), zoned R-4
d. History of Previous Actions: N/ A
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities:
1. Public Works
Location of sewer: There is sewer stub off of E Overland Road and an existing sewer
service off of E. Peacock Street
Location of water: There is currently a water service stubbed off of E. Overland
Road
Issues or concerns: None
2. Vegetation: There are some existing trees on the subject property that should either be
preserved or mitigated for at the time of development.
3. Floodplain: A portion of the site at the west property line is located within the 500-year
floodplain.
4. Canals/Ditches/Irrigation: N/ A
5. Hazards: Vehicular access to this site - This site has frontage on Overland Road and
Locust Grove Road. ACHD has not evaluated access on this site, as no development
application was submitted concurrently with the subject annexation request. Staff can not
guarantee the access proposed on-site will be approved by ACHD Staff. Planning Staff is
not aware of any other potential hazards on this site.
6. Proposed Zoning: L-O
Lpcust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & ADR-07.002
Page 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 8T AFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
7. Size of Property: 2.48 acres
f. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access: Although no development is proposed at this time,
the submitted Concept Map shows a driveway access to Locust Grove located near the south
boundary (located approximately 380 feet south of Overland Road). Staff is supportive of the
general location of this driveway as it appears to be the best location for access. However, Staff
believes that Overland / Locust Grove will likely become an even more intense intersection once
the Locust Grove overpass is complete. A full access in such close proximity to said intersection
may create a traffic hazard. Therefore, Planning Staff can not guarantee that a full access can or
will be granted by ACHD for the subject site.
g. Landscaping:
1. Width of street buffer(s): Per City Code (UDC Table 11-2B-3), a 25-foot wide landscape
street buffer is required adjacent to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road, both arterial
roadways.
2. Width of buffer(s) between land uses: Per City Code (UDC Table 11-2B-3) a 20-foot
wide landscape buffer is required between L-O zoned properties and residential
useslzones. There are residential uses to the south and west ofthis site.
7. COMMENTS MEETING
On April 13, 2007, Planning Staff held an agency comments meeting. The agencies and departments
present included: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Police Department, Meridian Parks Department,
Meridian Public Works Department, and the Sanitary Services Company. Staff has included all comments
and recommended actions in the attached Exhibit B. However, because this request is only for annexation,
comments are for informational purposes only.
8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
The 2002 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates the subject property as "Office." The
purpose of a medium density residential designation is to provide opportunities for low-impact business.
Uses may include offices, technology and resource centers, and ancillary commercial uses. (See 2002
City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan, page 106)
Staff finds the following Goals, Objectives, and Action items contained in the 2002 Comprehensive Plan
to be applicable to this application (Staff analysis is in italics below policy):
· Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 2 - "Restrict curb cuts and access points on collectors
and arterial streets."
On the submitted conceptual plan, the Applicant is proposing a single access to Locust Grove
Road, approximately 380-feet south of Overland Road. ACHD has not yet reviewed or approved
access to the site. City Staff is supportive of limiting vehicular access to this site to one point, as
allowed by ACHD.
· Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 4 - "Require appropriate landscape and buffers along
transportation corridors (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.)."
Overland Road and Locust Grove Road are designated arterial streets. By City Ordinance, 25-
foot wide landscape buffers are required adjacent to Overland Road and Locust Grove Road.
Landscape buffers along Overland and Locust Grove Roads will be required by the City at the
time of procurement ofCertificate(s) of Zoning Compliance.
· Chapter V, Goal III, Objective D, Action 5 - "Require all commercial businesses to install and
maintain landscaping."
The Applicant is not specifically proposing to install any landscaping with the subject annexation
application. In order to construct buildings on this site the Applicant will be required to construct
internal and perimeter landscaping at the time of procurement of Certificate(s) of Zoning
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07-004, AL T-07-005, & ADR-07-002 Page 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF ruNE 5, 2007
Compliance. Additionally, the Applicant must obtain Certificate(s) of Zoning Compliance prior to
submittal for building permit(s).
. Chapter IV, Goal I, Objective A, Action - "Pennit new... commercial development only where
urban services can be reasonably provided at the time of final approval and development is
contiguous to the City."
This property is contiguous to the City and sanitary sewer and water are readily available.
. Chapter VII, Goal 1, Objective B - "Plan for a variety of commercial and retail opportunities
within the Impact Area."
Staff believes that the proposed zone, which allows office uses, does contribute to the variety of
uses in this area which include: a church, single-family homes, multi-family apartments, and
retail stores.
Staff finds that the proposed zoning to L-O is harmonious with and in accordance with the
Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on Staff's analysis, other
agency/department comments, and any other comments received regarding the appropriateness of zoning
this site for office uses.
9. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
a. Allowed Uses in the Commercial Districts: UDC Table 11-2B-2 lists the pennitted, accessory,
and conditional uses in the L-O zoning district. Personal and Professional Services are listed as
principally pennitted uses in the L-O zone.
b. Purpose Statement of Zone: The purpose of the Commercial Districts is to provide for the retail
and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four
Districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures
accommodated in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of
the district in proximity to streets and highways.
10. ANALYSIS
a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation:
AZ Application: Approval of the subject annexation application would allow the Applicant to
obtain an office zone. According to current City Code, professional offices and clinics are
principally pennitted in the proposed L-O zone. The Applicant has submitted conceptual site and
landscape plans showing how this site will redevelop, with a single office building, parking, and
landscaping.
Based on the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan and the general compliance
of the proposed concept plan with the Ordinance for L-O zoning, Staff believes that the zoning of
this site to L-O is in the best interest of the City. Please see Exhibit C for detailed analysis of facts
and findings.
The annexation legal description submitted with the application (stamped February 15, 2007, by
Jeffrey H. McAllister, RLS) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary
of the City of Meridian.
Development Agreement: UDC 11-5B-3D2 provides the Planning & Zoning Commission and
City Council the authority to require a property owner to enter into a Development Agreement
with the City of Meridian that may require some written commitment for all future uses. Due to
the proposed use and the adjacent residential uses, Staff believes that a Development Agreement
is necessary to ensure that this property is developed in a fashion that is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and does not negatively impact nearby properties. If the Commission or
Council feel additional development agreement requirements are necessary, Staff recommends a
clear outline of the commitments of the developer being required.
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & ADR-07-002
Page 6
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
A Development Agreement (DA) will be required as part of an annexation of this property. Prior
to the annexation ordinance approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,
the property owner( s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. The
Applicant shall contact the City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433 within six months of Council
approval to initiate this process. The DA shall incorporate the provisions listed in Exhibit B of the
Staff Report.
Concept Plan: Staff is generally supportive of the submitted conceptual site plan for this
property. However, as the plan is conceptual, Staff is unable to gauge whether the site dimensions
as shown on the plan will fully comply with the UDC. The Applicant should be aware that all
parking areas, drive aisles, landscaping, sidewalks, lighting, signage, building height, and
building setbacks for this development should comply with the applicable provisions set forth in
the Unified Development Code. Staff will provide a detailed review with the Certificate of
Zoning Compliance application. The Applicant should be required to develop this site in general
conformance with the submitted concept plan, prepared by Ruby I Edwards: Architecture +
Design, dated February 9, 2007.
Access: Vehicular access to this property proposes a challenge. This property has approximately
220 feet of frontage on Overland Road and 415 feet of frontage on Locust Grove Road. ACHD
policy requires right-in / right-out driveways located on arterial roadways to be constructed a
minimum of 220 feet from a stop controlled intersection; 440 feet is required for a full access
driveway. The property clearly does not have enough frontage on either street to meet the
District's policy for full access. Additionally, there is an existing roadway, Peacock Street,
located approximately 150 feet south of the proposed driveway access that may create potential
turning conflicts if a full-access driveway were to be located 380 feet south of Overland Road.
Access to this site shall be limited to one driveway, in a location determined by ACHD.
Parking: For professional offices, parking stalls are currently required at the rate of one space
per 500 square feet of gross floor area (UDC ll-3C-6B). For all office uses, parking stalls are
currently required at the rate of one space per 500 square feet of gross floor area (UDC 11~3C-
6B). Per this requirement, 42 stalls are required. The proposed site plan depicts 58 parking stalls
on this site, with designated handicap accessible stalls. This provision exceeds the City's
minimum parking stall ratio. Staff believes that the site will have ample parking.
Per UDC 11-3C-6G, one bicycle parking space shall be provided for every 25 vehicle parking
spaces. The Applicant should provide a minimum 2-park bicycle rack on this site.
Office Uses: Professional and sales offices, laboratories, health care services and medical clinics
are some of the most common principally permitted uses within the requested L-O zone. Staff
believes that these principally permitted uses are appropriate for this property. However, there are
several retail and ancillary commercial uses that can occur in the L-O zone with conditional use
permit approval. The properties at the remaining comers of Overland / Locust Grove are zoned
for commercial uses. Staff is concerned that this property may also turn into a commercial retail
site, and is recommending that the City limit the uses that can operate on the site to principally
permitted uses in the L-O zone. This recommendation is intended to protect the residential
neighbors to the south and west from more intense commercial uses (restaurants, laundromats,
animal hospitals, etc.) that could potentially operate on this property with CUP approval.
According to the UDC, no building or other structure shall be erected, moved, added to or
structurally altered, nor shall any building, structure, or land be established or changed in use
without a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) issued by the Administrator. A Certificate of
Zoning Compliance shall be issued only in conformity with the provisions of this Title and shall
be required before the issuance of a building permit. Prior to construction of any building on this
site, a Certificate of Zoning Compliance permit should be obtained.
Upon annexation and zoning of the property to L-O, the existing residence will become a legal
non-conforming use. The Applicant, Commission, and Council should be aware that no
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07 -004, AL T -07 -005, & ADR -07-002
Page 7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
alterations, expansions, reconstructions, or other enlargements to the structure will be permitted.
Hours of Operation: In the Applicant's submittal letter, the Applicant addresses the hours of
operation for the proposed development. The Applicant proposes the hours of 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Therefore, Staff is recommending that the hours of operation for businesses on this site be limited
through a Development Agreement from 7 am to 6 pm.
Landscaping: Overland Road and Locust Grove Road are classified as arterial roadways.
Twenty-five feet of landscape buffer is currently required adjacent to arterial roadways (ODC
Table 11~2B.3). As detailed in the Alternative Compliance section below, the Applicant is
proposing a landing within a portion of the required street buffers. Landscape buffers along
Overland Road and Locust Grove Road will be required by the City with future CZC approval.
Additionally, if the subject annexation and zoning application is approved, the property will then
be adjacent to residential properties, zoned R-4, within the City of Meridian. To mitigate the
existing land uses to the south and west from the future office uses on this site, 20-foot wide
landscape buffers along the perimeter should be installed prior to receipt of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the proposed building. (See UDC Table 11-2B-3)
Alternative Compliance: UDC 11-2B-3A-l requires a 25-foot wide landscape buffers along
arterials. UDC 11-3B-7 prohibits impervious surfaces within landscape street buffers. Due to size
unusual shape of the subject property and topographical constraints, the Applicant states that
strict adherence to the 25-foot landscape buffer requirement on arterials is not feasible.
Additionally, the Applicant maintains that the alternative compliance provides a superior means
for meeting the landscaping requirements.
The Applicant has submitted an application for alternative compliance approval to construct a
landing at the comer of the Overland / Locust Grove intersection, retaining walls, and two
stairways which lead a public plaza, are all to be located within the required arterial buffers. The
Applicant states that the landing / stairways / plaza will add to the appeal of the comer lot, will be
more conducive to the design of the site, and friendlier to the public.
Staff is supportive of the proposed concept landscape plan, including the alternative compliance
proposal, as depicted in Exhibit A. Staff believes that the subject property does have
topographical/shape restraints which warrant alternative means to compliance with the
landscaping requirements of the UDC. Significant excavation / grading will be necessary to
facilitate the construction of the proposed office building on the site. Staff believes the conceptual
landscape plan incorporates innovative design such as a water feature, and will provide visual
interest for the traveling public. Further, Staff believes the plaza will be an appealing gathering
area for future employees on-site.
Staff, the Commission, and Council shall make the following determinations in order to grant
approval for Alternative Compliance:
a. Strict adherence to application of the requirements is not feasible; OR
b. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the
requirements; and
c. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair
the intended uses and character ofthe surrounding properties.
Staff believes that the alternative landscaping proposal does provide a superior means in
which to meet the intended purposes of the landscaping regulations. Please see Exhibit B for
detailed conditions of approval and Exhibit D for the Alternative Compliance findings.
Design Review Standards (UDC 11-3A-19): Staff fmds that the subject site generally complies
with the standards for office structures greater than 10,000 square feet within the L-O district.
Please see Exhibit B for detailed Conditions of Approval.
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & ADR-07-002
Page 8
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF ruNE 5, 2007
1. Architectural Character:
a. Facades - Facades visible from a public street shall incorporate modulations in the
fayade, roof line recesses and projections along a minimum of twenty percent (20%)
of the length of the facade.
b. Primary public entrance(s) - The primary building entrance(s) shall be clearly defmed
by the architectural design of the building. Windows, awnings, or arcades shall total a
minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the facade length facing a public street.
c. Roof lines - Roof design shall demonstrate two or more of the following: a)
overhanging eaves, b) sloped roofs; c) two or more roof planes; d) varying parapet
heights; and e) cornices.
d. Pattern variations - At least two changes in one or a combination of the following
shall be incorporated into the building design: color, texture, and / or materials.
e. Mechanical equipment - All ground-level and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be
screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line.
The proposed structure meets only one of the design requirements for roof lines
listed in subsection c above. The Applicant shall provide eaves, a sloped roof,
parapets, and / or cornices. Otherwise, Staff believes that the submitted elevations
generally comply with the aforementioned standards.
2. Color and materials: Exterior building walls shall demonstrate the appearance of high-
quality materials of stone, brick, wood or other native materials. Acceptable materials
include tinted or textured masonry block, textured architectural coated concrete panels,
tinted or textured masonry block, stucco, or stucco-like synthetic materials. Smooth-faced
concrete block, tilt-up concrete panels, or prefabricated steel panels are prohibited except
as accent materials.
The Applicant proposes a combination of textured concrete block, with accents of
corrugated metal. A portion of the building will have a stucco finish. The building
will be terra cotta-colored or other various earth tones. Additionally, the window
frames will be bronze-colored. Please see the Applicant's narrative for more details
regarding the building fa~ades.
3. Parking Lots: No more than seventy percent (70%) of the off.street parking area for the
structure shall be located between the front fayade of the structure and abutting streets,
unless the principal building(s) and / or parking is / are screened from view by other
structures, landscaping and/or berms.
4. Pedestrian walkways:
a. A continuous internal pedestrian walkway that is a minimum of eight feet (8') in
width shall be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance.
The walkway width shall be maintained clear of any outdoor sale displays, vending
machines, or temporary structures.
b. The internal pedestrian walkway shall be distinguished from the vehicular driving
surfaces through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks.
c. Walkways at least eight feet (8') in width, shall be provided for any aisle length that
is greater than one-hundred fifty (150) parking spaces or two hundred feet (200')
away from the main building entrance.
d. The walkways shall have weather protection (including but not limited to an awning
or arcade) within twenty of all customer entrances.
As the subject site does not lie within an entryway corridor, and there is a significant grade
change from the adjacent arterial streets to the building pad that makes an 8-foot wide
walkway difficult, Staff does not believe the pedestrian walkway requirement of the design
review standards should be applied here.
Locust Grove Professional Office ~ AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & ADR-07-002
Page 9
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
Staff believes the unusual shape and topographical constraints of the property restricts
design of the property to accommodate rear parking. Additionally, the proposed building
will shield the majority of the parking lot which will likely not be visible from Overland
Road. Therefore, Staff does not believe the parking lot requirement of the design review
standards should be applied here, as well.
The building elevations prepared by Ruby I Edwards: Architecture + Design, Sheet Number A3.1
and dated April 20, 2007, are supported by Staff, as they generally comply with most of the
Design Review standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-19 listed above (see roofline section).
Certificate of Zoning Compliance: The purpose of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC)
permit is to ensure that all construction, alterations and/or the establishment of a new use
complies with all of the provisions of the UDC before any work on the structure is started and/or
the use is established (UDC 11-5B-1A). To ensure that all of the conditions of approval listed in
Exhibit B are complied with, the Applicant will be required to obtain CZC approval from the
Planning Department prior to building construction, and all improvements must be installed prior
to occupancy.
b. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the subject application AZ-07-004
(and ALT-07-00S & ADR-07-002) with the Development Agreement provisions listed in the
in Exhibit B of the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 3, 2007. The Meridian Plannin!!
and Zonin!! Commission heard this proiect on Mav 3. 2007. At the public hearin!!. they
moved to recommend approval to the City Council. The Meridian City Council heard the~e
itemli on June 5. 2007. At the DubHe hearinl! thev aDD roved the ~uhiect AZ reouest.
11. EXHmITS
A. Vicinity / Zoning Map, Site Photos, Concept Plan, Landscape Plan, and Elevations
B. Agency and Department Comments
C. Legal Description
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
Locust Grove Professional Office - AZ-07-004, ALT-07-005, & ADR-07-002
10
Page
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARlMENT STAfF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
A. Vicinity I Zoning Map, Site Photos, Concept Plan, and Elevations
Exhibit A
Page 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
Exhibit A
Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
\
e-
,
\..
JvtRLANL AD
r
~~'"'~
\
\
'\"--1'"
: \
,
!
\
\
\
\
\
'f~'~
',,,,", ~
(1 .....'~
'".
\
\
~
I
co
-0.
~1
\!::o
it,
,1:
'-'
,-
~~
\
s
\
\
m~
\,
~-R
\
\
\
C/'
~.
\
\
\
\
\
-....-.
L
....
S80'95'Y;"l
140E:.'
Exhibit A
re:
~yl~..
archi.t;~t:u..r..
+d...:!.p, p;...
'15W....._
-. 11)$l:!W
"'..~7:l2J
. f"~~
..._~.....
. (@roPYiiGH::r'2007
.1Ii.~~~"~
."""....~i;iomil.............._~
,~~..-=
i
~
_!9
'C
'e
.~
~~
-.-~'
fa "a "D
C::li
1.0>0 ::113
om III q
IJ~' ;
i:!~ rS.
i.t l
F>RELIMINARY
Not FOR CDIf51'ROC'llOO .
.~~_.. :~~.. _" ~.~L~
'~1In
...
*
;)\lI'!~ -"
~~__._._._ -:iIU
;:..,~~. , ... _. .. ...____.__.~/tI'.
Al.1
. WItW
_M
Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
- Ii b
N
"
<>
'" ..
":::~~':i~:~~\\.
, "~'j
. ,,00'--1; '..
'd" ',: ~.,I'c:"11
. , I
;'1
1
.'. l'
!l' ~
- "i ,~,:..,.,:.. ~
~~l.tl;j
~~3 '\ ~~1;'~11
. 't;.
(~~ (01
'.... '.r4l." 1~:
'~~ (~-",: ,',I
~. Irf.,)
! '1,4
..---....., 1">",,*]),< JI
/":;;"._i /,. \
r~~' -':~~,:~::- \~-'!~) \., ...
ii~' ---- I
\~:~,:- -',"-,;~ ,-;.....'=co. . ' _'. ' I
\~:;;;/ '< -/~l '-~--~"~I'
.,,-!Jl]L~~'.-...2c-....J:..1
.~
a
i .;
I i
]
~^..,. ~
f~ QD
~ ~
-, 2
.- ~
.\J 0
II" - I
I . i. I
ll!ll i: lilt
j ~~l~ lid
I . "...
r,},~,~ .
l"~-'
r~f~_ ~.; -~
i~
.
J'll'n
J i Hi. j ,
II"! " -,
ll!~II!hi !illil
if !11.!IIIlIll!1.
w _. ,. .. j
... j lH H ti ,ffi' J l I 11 ..1
l il I H' Jl U ~l] d It 'I'" htl i
d. J 'l~i H j~dl g '11' .
i.. if t l t', H H iT1} ~ ll! i I t f ql f
I 'If j I" n J'J1ii;. . I \ J IIJl "
l t) j J. ! q f! .! h jJ d 11 II "11 .
1 II- . IJi f t.t ltl~ Ij 1 f l , It! I
I "1~1 J ~J) ~f iliidr It lHj: ''i H~I l
..~. .II Jrlt if "IPhi 11 hrl I ii' Hd '
~Hlhhhi if tpj~U! t! ljh ffijhHP !
~!H jlllllJU IIJIII ld I It h Ii lj till if!; t ih
~ln!~fll Hitll !timll I'll I'l 11111 ! II HIll iIIII J
'.1.. ..i.J,I.j'..l~.11 f.'i.ocZ._1 ..(.,~I
Exhibit A
Page 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
I Overland Elevation (North) I
I Locust Grove Elevation (East) I
I Sportsman's Pointe Elevation (West) I
I Sportsman's Pointe Elevation (South) I
Exhibit A
Page 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF ruNE 5, 2007
B. Agency and Department Comments
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.1 The legal description submitted with the application (stamped February 15, 2007, by Jeffrey H.
McAllister, RLS) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary of the City
of Meridian. The Public Works Department has conftrmed that the submitted legal description
meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and the Idaho State Tax Commission.
1.2 Prior to the annexation ordinance approval, a Development Agreement (DA) shall be entered into
between the City of Meridian, property owner (at the time of rezone ordinance adoption), and the
developer. The Applicant shall contact the City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433 within 6 months
of the City Council approval to initiate this process. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the
following:
· That development of this property shall conform to the concept plan prepared by The Land
Group, Inc., dated February 9, 2007, labeled Sheet Al.I, as determined by the Planning
Director or otherwise approved through a Conditional Use Permit.
· That no alterations, expansions, reconstructions or other enlargements to the existing single-
family structure will be permitted.
· That prior to submittal for Certificate of Zoning Compliance, the existing home shall be
removed and all wells and septic systems abandoned.
. That no building or other structure shall be erected, moved, added to or structurally altered,
nor shall any building, structure, or land be established or changed in use without a
Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC).
. That all parking areas, drive aisles, landscaping, sidewalks, lighting, signage, building
height and building setbacks for this development shall comply with the applicable
provisions set forth in the Unified Development Code.
. That all future uses shall not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general
welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
. That the following shall be the only allowed uses on this property: Principally Permitted uses
within the L-Q zone.
. That the hours of operation shall be limited to 7 a.m.. to ~ p.m.. 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
. That one office-type building may be constructed on this site.
. That the future office building shall have a maximum size of approximately 21,000 square
feet, and be restricted to a height of 35 feet.
. That Staff has reviewed a design review application for the future building on this site. That
said future office building shall provide: variations in roof lines and either eaves, a sloped
roof, parapets, and / or cornices; a form of awning over all building entrances; at least 30%
of the street.facing fac;ades to contain windows; and at least two different types of siding and
accent materials. The structure shall be generally compatible in appearance and bulk with the
provisions listed above and the elevations submitted, prepared by Ruby I Edwards:
Architecture + Design, dated April 20, 2007, as determined by the Planning Director or
otherwise approved through a Conditional Use Permit.
. That a 25-foot wide landscape street buffer will be constructed adjacent to Overland Road,
and Locust Grove Road, located entirely outside of the right-of-way. That alternative
compliance has been granted for construction of a concrete landing, retaining walls, and two
stairways within the required street landscape buffers. And, that said landscape buffers shall
be installed prior to receipt of occupancy of the office building.
. That a 20- foot wide land use buffer and 6- foot tall, vinyl perimeter fencing, constructed in
accordance with the UDC, will be installed along the south and west property lines; that said
land use buffers and fencing shall be installed prior to receipt of occupancy of the office
building.
Exhibit B Page 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
. That the Aoolicant installs either bollards or cement oosts in the southwest corner of the lot
oarallel with the entrance to the site.
. That vehicular access to this site shall be restricted to one driveway to Locust Grove Road, as
approved by ACHD; no vehicular access to Overland Road is approved.
. That the Applicant installs any and all sewer mains, water mains, and/or ftre hydrants that are
deemed necessary during construction plan review. This may include water connections in
both Overland and Locust Grove Roads.
. That the Applicant provides easements for all required sewer and water mains that are not
located within the right-of-way.
. That the Applicant ftles a floodplain development application with the City of Meridian
Public Works Department prior to commencement of work or improvement within the
floodway or floodplain on this property .
. That the Applicant pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection
fees, as determined during the plan review process.
1.3 No signs are approved with the subject annexation approval. All business signs will require a
separate sign permit in compliance with UDC II-3D.
1.4 All future construction / uses on this site should comply with the provisions of the Unifted
Development Code in effect at the time of submittal.
2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
2.1 The Applicant shall comply with all City of Meridian Public Works standards and procedures for
development on this property.
3. MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
3.1 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and
water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing.
3.2 Final Approval of the fIre hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 12" outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications.
d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on comers when spacing permits.
e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade.
g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements ofthe IFe Section 509.5.
h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing
buildings within 1,000 feet ofthe proj ect.
3.3 All entrance and internal roads and alleys shall have a turning radius of28' inside and 48' outside
radius.
3.4 For all Fire Lanes, provide signage "No Parking Fire Lane."
3.5 Fire lanes, streets, and structures including the canopy height of mature trees shall have a vertical
clearance of 13'6".
3.6 Operational ftre hydrants, temporary or permanent street signs and access roads with an all
weather surface are required before combustible construction is brought on site.
3.7 Building setbacks shall be per the International Building Code for one and two story construction.
3.8 Commercial and office occupancies will require a fIre-flow consistent with the International Fire
Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per Appendix D.
3.9 The fIre department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the
development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient
Exhibit B Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF ruNE 5, 2007
response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be
borne by the developer.
3.10 Maintain a separation of 5' from the building to the dumpster enclosure.
3.11 Provide a Knox box entry system for the complex prior to occupancy.
3.12 The first digit of the Apartment/Office Suite shall correspond to the floor level.
3.13 The Applicant shall work with Planning Department staff to provide an address identification plan
and a sign which meets the requirements of the City of Meridian sign ordinance at the required
intersection( s ).
3.14 All aspects of the building systems (including exiting systems), processes & storage practices shall
be required to comply with the International Fire Code.
3.15 All portions of the buildings located on this project must be within 150' of a paved surface as
measured around the perimeter of the building.
3.16 Provide exterior egress lighting as required by the International Building & Fire Codes.
3.17 There shall be a fire hydrant within 100' of all Fire Department connections.
3.18 Buildings over 30' in height are required to have access roads in accordance with Appendix D,
Section Dl05.
3.19 The fITe department is opposed to any landscape island in the middle of a cui de sac that may prevent
a fITe truck from turning around on the end of the court.
4. MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
4.1 The proposed development shall limit landscaping shrubs and bushes to species that do not
exceed two feet in height. Trees shall have a canopy of no less than six feet.
4.2 The Meridian Police Department has concerns about the limited visibility of the main
entrance from a public street.
5. SANITARY SERVICES COMPANY
5 .1 Waste enclosure access: The Applicant shall provide drive-on capability for 6 and 8 cubic yard
containers. Allow a minimum of 60 ft. frontal clearance for such containers.
5.2 Provide a minimum 28' inside and 48' outside radius for all alleys and private streets, where they
intersect a public street.
6. MERIDIAN PARKS DEPARTMENT
6.1 Standard for Mitigation of trees: The standard established in the City of Meridian Landscape
Ordinance (UDC ll-3B-1O) will be followed.
6.2 Standard Plan for Protection of Existing Trees during Construction: The standard established in
the City of Meridian Landscape Ordinance (UDC ll-3B-1O) will be followed.
Exhibit B Page 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
C. Legal Description
TOOTHMAN-ORTON ENGINURlNG COMPANY
CONSULTINO IlNOINJERS.SUJtwYOaS AND PlANNI!RS
9777GHINDENBOl.,!lEVARD
BOISE.IDAHO 83714-2008
208,lil,22811 . FAlll08-J2:>-2399
. boi'~CM:(Ip"Q,~m.
PROJECTNO: 07021.
DATE: February 15,2007
PAGE: 1 ofl
EXHIBIT "A"
RElONE DESCRIPTION
A portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Townsbip J North.
Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, AdaCouDty, Idaho, de$Cribed as follows:
BEGINNJNG /lube corner commonto Sectionsl?, 18, 19 and 20, Township 3 North, Range
I East, Boise Meridian,. from which the Quartet crimer common to said Sections J 8 and 19; bears
8.89043 '43"W.. 2649.17 feet; thence, along the easterly line of said Section! 9,
1. S,00034'2S'W,, 488.00 feet; thenc~, alongtbe northerly line of Lots S6amL57, Block 2
of ~portsrnan Pointe Subdivision No,S and the easterly prolongation thereof.
2. N,89025'JS-"W., 148.85 feet; thence, aJcmgthe easterly line of saidSportsnianPonnte
Subdivision No.5 and the prolcingationthereof;
3. N. I 60 I 9'30"W., 50S ,46 fcetto the northerly line of said Sectioo19; thence, along said
northerly. line,
4. N.89"4J'43"E., 295.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNlNG,
CONT AlNJNG:.2A8 acres, more or less.
Reference is made toEXHlBIT "B" - Rezone Sketch Plan, which is made a part of this
document.
THlSDESCRJPTlON WAS PREPMED PROM INFORMATION CONTAINED IN INSTRlJMENT NO~S
102OS922l AND 1020933911.
~
FER 1 ~ ton'l
i If' \ .-r
BOlSE · C()EURd'Al.BNE . CALDWELL
Exhibit C
Page I
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF JUNE 5, 2007
18
589'43'43"W 2649;17' POINT OF Bi'GINNIN
r E, N~~E noiW - - ,18 17
295.81'
IQ
B 19
I
I
$
I
I
12
5
I
Jg
-:,5
i
~
I
ADA COUNT'? HIGHWAY DISTRICT
INSTRUMENT NO 102095396
N89'4l'4J~E
201.84'
NOTE~
THIS SKETCH WAS PREPARED
~OM INfORMATION CONTAINED
IN INSTRUMENT NO.S 102059223
AND 102093398. - -
LEGEND
REZONE 8OO"fOARY
----
PROPERTY liNE
SE:C110N LINE
II CALCULATED POINT
~
fj
I
t
!
l!s
I
Iii!
..,
! EXHIBIT "B"
__-;8 REZONE SKETCH PLAN
A PORTION Of THE
'I' NE 1/4, NE 1/4 SECTION 19.
TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH. RANGE 1 EAST, a.M.
CITY OF MERIDIAN. ADA COUNTY. IDAHO
Ii
o
_30
~ ,
SCALE: ,"=60'
,,r.
",....
,,-
~...t :.:'/'-
.~. .(-
t
~'a
~-~"
:;;,-
a.~
-Ol
11.
l
I
REZONE AREA
- +
2.48 ACRES -
III
_ 0
~g
......
q -.I;
rf
I
I
~a
.t.I
....~
Q> .
.~
01_
~g
-t
;0' -
c:8
~C
3~
Z:x:
0-
-~
~:E
OJ>
~-<
<Do
tzLii
<0""'
(JI';o
~-
19 20
lfllJ
f.I)
~~R
?lI C,.ofs:::
g~~--
. N,
(,1l
i~
~
~
~
-~
- ...
Exhibit C
4a.oo'
CO,
ENGINEERS ~ SURvEYORS. PV,NNERS
0717 CHINOEN 80UtEVARD . BOiSE. IOAHO:8,3714:"'2008
PHONE: 208-323-2288 . fA.X:208":'32~.,-2J99 '
r-M: 1t'\plO2'/WD1(tIIt ~.ll2t1S/~1.Kl& 07iJ27
Page 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3,2007
B. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. Annexation Findings:
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation
and shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation
and/or rezone, the Council shall make the following findings:
a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan;
The Applicant is proposing to zone all of the subject property to L-O. The Council finds that
the proposed zoning map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the
Staff Report for more information.
b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district,
specifically the purpose statement;
The Council finds that professional offices, laboratories, libraries, and medical clinics would
be permitted uses within the requested L-O zone. There are also several uses in the requested
L-O zone that can occur with conditional use permit approval. The Council is concerned that
this area may turn into a commercial retail site, and is recommending that the City limit the
uses that can operate on the site through a development agreement. The Council fmds that
future development of this property should comply with the established regulations and
purpose statement of the L-O zone.
c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare;
The Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare. Staff and the Commission recommend City Council rely on any
oral or written testimony that may be provided when determining this fmding.
d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services
by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not
limited to, school districts; and,
The Council fmds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact
upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site.
e. The annexation is in the best of interest ofthe City (UDC 11-5B-3.E).
The Council finds that all essential services are available or will be provided by the developer
to the subject property and will not require unreasonable expenditure of public funds. In
accordance with the fmdings listed above, the Council finds that Annexation and Zoning
of this property to L-O would be in the best interest of the City, if the Applicant enters
into Development Agreement (DA) with the City, as mentioned in Section 10 of the Staff
Report.
2. Alternative Compliance Findings (UDC ll-5B-5E):
a. Strict adherence or application of the requirements is not feasible; OR
The Council fmds that the subject property has topographical/shape restraints. This does, in
fact, preclude full compliance with the City's landscaping standards.
b. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the
requirements; and
Exhibit D
Page 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEP ARlMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF MAY 3, 2007
The Council fmds the alternative compliance does provide a superior means for meeting the
City's landscaping requirements. The Council fmds the conceptual landscape plan
incorporates iIlllovative design such as a water feature and will provide visual interest for the
traveling public. Additionally, the Council believes the plaza will be an appealing gathering
area for future employees on-site. Therefore, the Council supports the proposed concept
landscape plan, as depicted in Exhibit A.
c. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair
the intended uses and character of the surrounding properties.
The Council finds that the proposed alternative will not be detrimental to the public welfare
or impair the use / character of the surrounding properties.
Exhibit D
Page 2