The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003-11-18 CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: ---L- Tammy de Weerd ~ Bill Nary + Cherie McCandless -X- Keith Bird o Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: ~VLe- 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: (30 minutes*) lre~u;0 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): (20 minutes*) I1A7 deciT/~ *Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Meridian City Council Agenda - November 18,2003 Page I of 1 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. c CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING -AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: x X Tammy de Weerd X Cherie McCandless X o Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird 2. Adoption of the Agenda: Approve 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: Presented (30 minutes*) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): (20 minutes*) No Decision * Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. ,. rvkridian City Council i-\gend:J - November 18, ~O()J P:.ige I of I All materials presentcd :.il public meetings shall bcconlc property of the City of iVlcridi:Jn. Anyone desiring accoml11odation for disabi lilies related to docunlcnts and/or hearings please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public mccting. ( ( Meridian City Pre-Council Meetinq November 18, 2003 The Pre-Council Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, November 18, 2003, by City Council President Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Tammy de Weerd, Cherie McCandless, Bill Nary, and Keith Bird. Members Absent: Mayor Robe~rt Corrie. Others Present: Bill Nichols, Gary Smith, Bill Musser, Anna Powell, Steve Siddoway, Kenny Bowers, and Will Berg. Item 1. Roll-call Attendance: x X Tammy de Weerd X Cherie McCandless X o Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird De Weerd: I will go ahead and open the - are we ready? I will go ahead, open the Pre-Council Meeting Agenda for Tuesday, November 18th, and welcome those of you that have joined us. I'll ask the City Clerk to call roll. Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda: De Weerd: Item Number 2 adoption of the agenda. Do I have a motion? Bird: Madam President. De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we adopt the agenda as published. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay it's been moved and seconded to adopt the agenda as presented. All those in favor say aye. All ayes motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES De Weerd: Item 3 presentation of the downtown revitalization market study. Mr. Siddoway. Item 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: Siddoway: Thank you Madam President and Members of the Council. ( December 31, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 6, 2004 APPLiCANT ITEM NO. REQUEST Approve minutes of November 18, 2003 Pre...Council Meeting ?d) AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY AlTORNEY CITY POLICE OEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUflDING DEPT: CITY WATER OEPT: CITY SEWER OEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SffilERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: ~ t~ Contacted: Emailed: Date: Phone: Staff Initials: Materia1s presented at public meetings shall b.eome properly of the City of Meridian. ( Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18,2003 Page 2 of 11 De Weerd: I should have said the Tom and Jerry show. Siddoway: We are here to report back to the Council on progress made since we were here last month. As you will recall when the Hudson Company was in town last month we were conducting a long series of interviews with local business owners, local property owners and gathering feedback and ideas and issues from them. Since that time, the Hudson Company has been synthesizing that information as well as doing a lot of market research. Looking regionally looking locally and looking at demographics, looking at market nitches and they're here to share their preliminary observations on that as well. I have handed out a couple of items. The first is t he flyer t hat was p ut together for tonight's 0 pen house. This does begin at 7:00 P.M. across the street at the Nazarene Church. We will be holding a public open house and workshop on these issues tonight. We have had excellent coverage in the paper as I also handed out from the Statesman as well as the Valley Times. In last Tuesday's addition on the second page, I've included the article that was in that paper for you as well. You have a copy of the full presentation as will be given to the public at the open house tonight. We have pulled out from this a - we have selected a hand full of what we feel are some of the most important in key slides that will give you the main points of what we intend to speak about at the public open house tonight. Tom Hudson from the Hudson Company will be presenting that to you. We have about 20 slides to get through in about - hopefully in about 15 minutes so what we would like to do is just give Tom that time to run through the slides, get through the presentation so that we can make sure you get all of the points we are trying to make. Then we will have time on the back end for any questions and answers. We can go back to any slides you want to discuss. With that, I would like to turn some time over to Tom Hudson. De Weerd: So that was your nice way of putting don't interrupt right? Siddoway: Thank you. Hudson: Madam President Members of the Council it's great to be back. We're excited to be here and we have a lot of very interesting news. We appreciate your time and we understand you have a number of things to get on with this evening. To agree I feel like I need to apologize for a brief briefing but I assure you that we're ready to take your questions now or if you would like to speak with us after tonight leave us a message and we will get back to you. We want to make sure that all of this information is something that you're comfortable with, you're clear where we're headed with it, and if you have any guidance or concerns, we want to respond to that as well. De Weerd: Well I think it would be helpful - oh, I see some of you have the slideshow. I don't. No, I don't have it. Okay. Thanks. Just so, we can jot notes on it. Hudson: Does everyone have one now? De Weerd: It's just me. ( Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18, 2003 Page 3 of 11 Hudson: We're about one third of the way through our work on the marketing analysis and strategy for downtown. Tonight we're here to share our preliminary observations and findings. I think you will see quite a range of issues addressed and a number of interesting conclusions. We are not at the stage where we're ready to propose future strategies or a collective vision but I think you will see that there are a number of pieces of information that lean us in certain directions and I think that's exciting. We're definitely on track a little bit of schedule with our research and I must say that we've had a tremendous amount of support from city staff here from officials at almost every level of government in the Treasure Valley folks that we went to asking for information and assistance and really received it. You've got a lot of allies in the Treasure Valley. The first thing that I would like to share with is 1'm sure you're quite interested to see this is a summary of what we heard back from the interviews. There were three levels of information that I wanted to share tonight. The first was citywide priorities, second is views about markets and the third is about downtown priorities. On citywide priorities it's a very consistent theme practically every person that was ever interviewed talked about the need to overcome traffic congestion. You may recall I ast time we w ere together wet alked i n terms of traffic management. I think that's an end. There were lots of different means that were discussed by people. There were people in pro couplet. There were people who were pro destination versus that is destination-oriented traffic versus getting through traffic around and so on. We're not here to promote one way or the other tonight but we do have some observations about traffic in the context of downtown revitalization and I'll get to that in a few minutes. Focusing now again on the - what people were talking about. That particular item was followed very closely by a lot of comments from people from many walks of life. People who have lived here for a long time and people that were new to the community were very interested in restoring a heart or a central place for the community. That I think was linked to that general comment of we need a stronger sense of community. I want to emphasize that a lot of people that we spoke to who are from here, grew up here or what have you still have a very strong sense of community. That was not the issue it was more about many of the people who have moved here who may work some place else or shop some place else and are looking for ways to be more strongly connected to the community. There were a number of comments about growth management in terms of again the - maintaining or looking toward a unique look and feel of the community and one that is not just recognizable but a Iso comfortable. A s you look at s orne 0 four transportation figures on places like Eagle Road, you will see why people would feel that way. The Better Public Private Partnership and Vision - I didn1t hear many people say we have a bad public/private partnership. A lot of people, in terms of the down town said things like the conditional use permit process right now is, while it's very understandable, does make it difficult for people to predict what is appropriate for future development. I think that was most of the context. Close public/private partnership in terms of implementing a vision for the community, especially the downtown was the other side - or the primary remainder of the source of that comment. In terms of market - pardon me, I am going to skip that because it comes up in a number of other ways. Downtown priorities, we talked about a heart social, cultural, even civic h ub 0 f the community. Many people " Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18,2003 Page 4 of 11 were interested to see the City Hall remain in the downtown. This would be a great place to be; came up quite often. Not just f rom nine to five, but in the evenings as well. A place where the community can come together and including residential uses where folks can shop after five o'clock and it still feels like it's their town. A number of people talked about - well, if I was to say what kind of a priority we should have and I wanted to give you a look or a feel of it, how about Hyde Park on a larger scale? It was remarkable to us how often Hyde Park came up as a very livable and visiting comfortable kind of place. This idea of a clear vision for the future I think that's one that is clear to the private sector and clear to the community and one that is broadly adopted, endorsed and supported in everything from the regulatory environment to various tools that are available for community development. I think the other one that I would emphasize on this particular slide is the Multi Generation Destination Center. You will see in a couple of moments that one of the most remarkable things in your demographic here is that you have the highest density of families of any community in Treasure Valley, about fifty percent of your households as well as very young families as a whole. I think that, as important as that is, many folks still talked about -- is not just about one age group, it's about all age groups and demographics being able to have a place that they collectively call their own. Just touching on a couple of points, you have a substantial number of people in this area. You see from 40,000 in the immediate Meridian community to about 330,000 in a 12-1'2 mile radius. That is very important to note. Irs also and perhaps even more important to note that not all those people are your primary markets. The question is who do we go after first and where do we focus limited resources? Go ahead. One of the most remarkable things about Meridian is your traffic. I am not telling you anything that you don't know of course. Those of us who live elsewhere often hear about your statistics and they truly are remarkable. If you look at the lower right hand corner of this slide you see 51 ,600. That's the number of vehicles on an average weekday going northbound at that one intersection. You probably know that is the worst intersection in the state and it really doesn't have significant competition at that level. If you about double that number to get to two-way traffic, imagine over 1 03,000 vehicles per day. I fyou divide that by the number of hours and seconds in a day, it still comes up to be a whopping big number. Now, if you just move to the center lower screen 43,000 people moving north from the freeway, there will be a number of those who stay in that area for work or what have you, business shopping and so on. Moving north of Franklin, if you divide Meridian and main irs still 27,700 people moving to heart of the community. That's an extraordinary number of people. It is something like a - if eight percent of the vehicles were trucks, that's something like a truck every 25 seconds throughout the day. So, that's a lot of vehicles and think of your sense of what is a great destination place to be and we will get into that in a moment too. That's a lot of folks. Notice a smaller number just above the 1 7,700 that's 0 n Idaho going eastbound 0 n an average day, 1 ,500 people. So, that's more or less your internal circulation numbers, so about 3,000 vehicles a day for the downtown as a destination. The rest are truly through traffic. The vast majority of those are going to be parties who have no inclination whatever to be in the downtown. Go ahead. l Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18,2003 Page 5 of 11 Hudson: I think it's very important to comment on the concept of through versus to traffic. The great downtowns of the world are downtowns that are great destinations and as destinations I mean where people get out of their cars and they walk, they are pedestrians. One of the Litmus tests done of a downtown is how positive it is for pedestrians who are walking around. When you have such high levels, 28,000 going one direction - that's 56,000 vehicles a day through the downtown heart, how much of a pedestrian environment can you have? How positive can it be? Is it pedestrians over drivers? You may recall I mentioned how long it takes for a pedestrian like me to push that button on Main and wait and wait and wait and what is the message that is going on there? This is not a pedestrian place. This is a place for automobiles and larger vehicles. So, what I see is people starting to take chances. As soon as they think there is a place to dodge they will try - those that can. That's not healthy. So, through traffic can degrade the downtown experience and I can say from my many, many years in this business, more is not equal to better. I know that for some people it would be - seems to be common sense that if you just have more vehicles going in front of a store, that's better. But, what is the nature of the business? And if the nature of the business is one that supposedly trying to attract people who are doing multi purpose shopping and want to linger and maybe go to lunch while they are also going to do business. All of that extra traffic isn't making it a better place. There is everything from the splash to the noise to the waiting to the diesel fumes, all those kind of things that degrade the experience of going to a central place. We believe as one of our roles is to act as champions for that central place. So we are being frank about this particular, what we perceive to be a need. So we'd like to share the failure of the regional transportation network does not justify sacrificing the heart 0 f your community tot hrough traffic. We thought, wen eed to s ay it i n a nutshell. Where d 0 we stand 0 n the issue 0 f through and to traffic. That's our position at this time. We stand to take your correction on that of course, but I think you understand where we are coming from that we are trying to do everything that we can to move downtown forward as a central place. One of the things that you won't see is all of our charts and graphs and so on. W e have limited the numbers 0 f those for t he purpose 0 f saving time. I just wanted to show you among other charts this is one that shows something truly remarkable about your community and that is how young it is. If you look at the deep red columns there, these are all your communities compared to each other in the Treasure Valley, as well as Ada County and you have got the highest population of young people and the highest population of people in the 25 to 44 age group. Now, there are lots of other kinds of insights like this that we have got for you in your hand out and in our ultimate report, but go ahead to the next slide. What it comes down to is this is kind of a summary now. You're significantly young as a population. While certainly you have a variety of people here the fact that you are 30 years old, have the highest percentage of children in homes - that is 33.7 percent. You have got the largest households, nearly three per household and highest percentage of families - that's 50 percent verses 38 percent in the County. It's truly a remarkable set of numbers. You have got the second highest household income. Eagle is the highest. Second lowest households in poverty and the lowest housing vacancy rate. One of the things that I also found very interesting was the highest owner occupied households at 84 percent. While, I am not going to show you the slide, (r-- (' l Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18, 2003 Page 6 of 11 I think ifs important for you to know that if you compare your local average income to the average cost of a house, you have the highest ratio in Meridian of any community in the Treasure Valley. Now, one of the implications is that it is very likely that that would indicate a much higher disposable income, in comparison to others because you are paying less of your income for your house, which is typically the largest cost of living. Okay. Next. This is one of a number of tables that we put together to indicate how important your local market is. You are certainly not the largest - second largest community, but you are the second largest community in terms of consumer buying power. You note that your ahead of Nampa, substantially a large community, but because of your income level you have got a lot of income here that collectively these other communities fall behind. If you compare down to Eagle that's about - what 342 million dollars more than Eagle in terms of consumer buying power. That is, you donlt have to go far away to find markets. The question is what are great primary markets? It's your own people. We do have another slide - go ahead - that I wish I could have had time to show you, but fundamentally what it shows us is that while youlve got 21 percent of the Boise population you only ha.ve 17 percent of the retail trade potential. So, to a degree it says you are under retailed and that is very consistent with whafs going on with the other numbers. That is, you are a tremendous market and it seems that a lot of your consumers are going elsewhere to buy. So, thafs an opportunity. A substantial opportunity. These are some of the traits - I'll just ask you to take a look at down the list, the ones that I have emphasized there in yellow are the ones that I think are very important to take away with you. We looked also at the - not just the demographics, b ut t he behavior 0 f consumers through a variety 0 f information that is available 0 ut t here a nd found that yau a re remarkably different here in your community from other cities in the Treasure Valley. For example, the top three consumer behavior groups, they are called psycho graphic groups in your community represent 78 percent of the population. The only other town with anything close to that of those three particular groups is Eagle with about 50 percent. Boise, Nampa and Caldwell are about zero. So, the primary people who live here are not well represented in the other communities. You are different. I think you always knew that. I have talked to a lot of people who said you know we are just not the typical Boisean or the typical Nampan. That's right. It's absolutely born out in the research that's out there. So, it would also imply that in terms of service to those people, you have a great opportunity to respond to their unique nature. Go ahead. I am sorry this is very wordy, but if you saw a really slick presentation each 0 ne 0 f t hose boxes fades in a nd 0 ut a s wet alk about them all, but we just had to throw them up in the interest of time. To give you a sense of some of the central strengths of the communities around you, as well as what's going on with you - go to the next one please - so we are taking a look at that and in looking at it we started to see a pattern here of Meridian's own strengths. Now some of these are clearer and some of them are growing. Retail along Eagle Road, Medical Office over to Meridian and then an education component that is actually broader than the circle board - we are just trying to say that you are starting to anchor your community with certain areas of specialization that can be tapped and grown. Now, the one in the middle, industrial, that's an (inaudible) strength -- go ahead - We think that's probably not going to last a lot longer given the kind of growth that's going on here, the ( ( Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18, 2003 Page 7 of 11 kind of densities that are here with more and more people coming into your center it's going to be more in conflict with industrial uses. We anticipate that there will b e a n evolution there that will move toward mixed u se - mixed u se being more residential, office place, retail, social and cultural kinds of activities that make it a really a dynamic core. One of the things that is most exciting to me about that is that you have this rail corridor with an extraordinarily wide right of way. It has the opportunity to provide you with some of that infield, but still growth potential. Go ahead. Now one of the things that we always look at is what are your niches and who is your competition in looking at downtowns? Well, downtown as a whole isn't competing. It doesn't have what you would say a logical market place collective strength that's identifiable. Individual businesses, George's, for example, the cycle shop do very well within the region, but outdoor recreation is not a niche for all of downtown. Do you see where I am going with that? So, as a whole you really don't - you don't have competition because you are not a competitor collectively. Now that can change rapidly as you identify a vision and a market strategy and start to build and we anticipate the very insightful kinds of numbers and other information that we are collecting is a powerful argument for some specific niches. I don't think you are going to have a lot of trouble given your very solid demographics, your buying power, etc., consumers and so on to begin to build a highly focused kind of a downtown that's reflective of both community values and economic realities. That's a direction that we are pushing. You do have strengths and I think they are important ones. City Hall representing the civic nature of place. Your Post Office is still in your downtown and it tends to anchor that kind of northern end of the walk-able part of the downtown. Food and beverages here, a lot of people come from around the region to some of your restaurants. That's an important point of the social side of community. That fire is an acronym for finance, insurance and real estate. The post office I mentioned, certainly your schools, churches, and the rail line I have talked about and access is definitely a strength. But, you know strengths - you often hear about the double-edged sword. If it's highly accessible and you have got a regional transportation system that's not working well, that access can become a weakness. Go ahead. So downtown opportunities that we have seen include t his I ist. We have looked at ita number 0 f different ways, b ut what I mean by social retailing is the kind of retailing that brings people together where they can congregate, they can linger, they can have a meal or do culture in the arts or experience culture in the arts in any number of ways, not just performing but to see if - heritage oriented activities would be included there. Here is an interesting question: Where is it that all the people of Meridian go to be Meridian people? Where do we collect? Where are we Meridianites? Is that what you call yourselves? We are wocsomonians in Moscow. That isM oscow spelled backwards. It goes back a century. I don't know if I should apologize for that, but that's who we are. Anyway, the kinds of opportunities that are out there, I think, are ones that aren't marginal opportunities, they are substantial ones. With people - who - very large in growing population that's well to do, has disposable income, but according to our psycho graphic kinds of information they don't necessarily travel nationally or internationally. They tend to travel more recently, there is a lot more stay at home orientation. What do they do? What can they do at home? Well, that's again, opportunity. I won't go through the entire list, but we believe that this is very exciting stuff. Go ahead. Some of the things that ( Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 1812003 Page 8 of 11 have come up both in terms of the interviews and also our own observations include an essentially oriented city hall that may tap into a future refinement of the rail line if it becomes a transit corridor. It may be your second front door and you might contemplate that. The Creamery is an icon of your heritage and it's a visual highly identifiable place that's somewhat on the decline, but what if it was - (laughter) Bird: -- sorry. Hudson: -- okay, that was a diplomatic thing, come on, I get some points for that I am sure. It's the kind of place that I have been to in other communities and seen get redeveloped in fascinating, very exciting ways. There are a few places that I will see in a community - I would love to be a part of that one. I would love to be a part of an adaptive, reuse of the Creamery building, to sustain the heritage and tap its eccentric architecture. Now it's eccentric for things other than diary, right? I mean, it was a creamery, but I have seen wonderful places all over the country. I am sure you can think of them. There is a torpedo factory, for example, in Virginia. A torpedo factory that's a phenomenal arts center and the scale is extraordinary. Just type in torpedo factory on the Internet. That's all you got to do and you will find it. Gate ways and signage, oh pardon me - the Farmer's and Merchant Bank and block I think it's a wonderful opportunity. What a great partner in your community, as I am sure you have heard they are working hard to be a future great partner as well. That is something that's coming up soon. Gateways and signage. Let's make sure we know that we are in and out and how to get around and to the parking places and when have you arrived and so on - I talked to you a bit about that last time. Zamzows Mill is another remarkable icon. What's it's future? Could it hold a place. I know a super regional mall, the Safeco subsidiary Win mar, not too long ago bought up some buildings over in the Seattle area that were old grain silos and what not for the purpose of turning them into a farmer's market that was going to be aligned with and part of a super regional mall. They wanted community there too. So, when you have places like this and they are unusual and they are part of your heritage they also can speak to your future in remarkable ways. Traffic circulation - There may be things that can be done there in the near future and I think that everyone we have spoken to has hope that that will be something that will be addressed soon. Central open space for events - a lot of people talked about being able to come to the downtown core, not just the inside places, but outside. Go ahead. These are some of our conclusions. Your immediate past has been a past of decline, but you have a truly a public/private partnership that has got wonderful strengths that's moving forward with visioning a viable future and I think it is truly not restricted by where you have been recently and in fact, you may be inspired by what you have been in a more distant past, in terms of strong sense of community. We believe your own community is just extraordinarily well suited to be your primary market. There are very few places that have such a great market built in, not even next door, but right here. Family and youth markets I think are important moderate price point. This is not necessarily the Beverly Hills kind of downtown future, but certainly a moderate price can be sustained with these kinds of demographics. I think we have spoken about most of these. This small scale I will touch on in the sense that many of your ( Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18, 2003 Page 9 of 11 properties in the downtown are relatively small lots and it gets fairly difficult to pull those together into larger chunks to do something big. I don't think that's necessarily a disadvantage. Many of the people that we talk to talked about scale ass omething they wanted to be able tor ecognize in t he future. A t the same time, you do have the potential for higher density along the rail line should that ever become available to the community. I know that there is some discussion about that. So, then linking business residential and government to a transit line and service in the future, I think, are important. Very quickly, it seems to me that as with other places around the greater Boise area one thing you might think about is if we did nothing - go ahead-- what might happen to Meridian? One great architect said to me if there is no center can there really be an edge? I think that is a very remarkable question. Or, alternatively, can you have a distinct community that's with a truly strong center that's identifiable and sustainable over the long term? I think that's the cross roads w here you are today. If - and I am not implying in any way that the community is doing nothing, in fact, on the contrary you are doing a lot in both in the public and private sectors. But, if you weren't focusing on a guiding development in the future, what would be the future? I think these two images as alternatives are thought provoking. Go ahead. Finally, next steps we are taking this information, pulling it together, focusing more and more on target markets, putting together a strategy and with that strategy you will be hearing from us about a draft strategy and giving us your guidance on that. We will move into, once it's finalized along with a vision, an action plan and that acronym at the bottom is who, what when, where, how, why. We don1t believe that any action plan can be an action plan without those things. So, we will be here with that kind of information in hand very specifically talking about how to accomplish the mission. I would be very happy to take your questions or comments. De Weerd: Council, any questions? Bird: I don't. I just appreciate the study that they have done so far and the information they have brought back. Nary: Sounds like you are on the track that we have been talking about. I think it's great. Hudson: Thank you. De Weerd: I think you did a great market study that anyone can use in trying to attract certain industries. It reconfirmed that I think the Creamery is a great spot for a spaghetti factory. I think it's marketable now. Nary: Now that we realize it's only in transition. De Weerd: So, thank you very much. I do look forward to finding out tomorrow morning what the comments you get tonight at the workshop are. That will be exciting to find out. / [ Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18,2003 Page 10 of 11 Siddoway: Madam President. I just wanted to ask if I may to make sure that the Council is comfortable with the statement that we made on our view of traffic in downtown in the to verses through and that we do see it as destination as the high priority there. Is that agreeable? De Weerd: I think that it was noticeably no one commenting on that was (inaudible) well, you should have been here. You'll have to attend the workshop now Jake. I think the point was very well taken. You built on what you told us when you were here the first time and you have actually strengthened what the original thought was and we need to decide if it's to or through. Through your market analysis, through your discussions with the different folks that we asked you to talk to that's a pretty clear statement. I guess the next steps are going - I will look forward to seeing what the traffic management solutions are and how we are going to utilize - probably Meridian Road is the only north south link as to managing some of that. Are there any other comments? Bird: I don't. Nary: Nope. McCandless: No. De Weerd: Well, great. Hudson: Thank you very much for your time. De Weerd: This is really exciting. I think you have given us a very positive step forward and I look forward to the rest of the story. Hudson: It will be coming soon, Madam President. Thank you all very much. Item 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): De Weerd: What I look forward as to being part of the rest of the story. Okay, Item Number 4 is Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1 )(c) and (f). I would entertain a motion. Bird: So moved. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay, it's been moved and seconded to adjourn into Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1 )(c) and (f). Mr. Clerk will you call role. Roll call: Bird, aye; McCandless, aye; Nary, aye; De Weerd, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES De Weerd: Thank you. Meridian City Pre-Council Meeting November 18, 2003 Page 11 of 11 (Enter into Executive Session) (Come back from Executive Session) De Weerd: Okay, it's been moved and seconded to come out of executive session no decisions were made, for the record. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES De Weerd: I would entertain a motion to adjourn the Pre-Council Meeting. Bird: So moved. McCandless: Second. De Weerd: Okay, it's been moved and seconded to adjourn the Pre-Council meeting of November 18, 2003. It is 6:55 p.m. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:55 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: ~YOR I I G I &4- DATE \\\\\\H II 'HUIIIII \\,\\ \~ Of ME"J;)A;: 11/1/ \.' .;l", -=- .,~ /~ ;:.' .,..,-" ~.A ~ ~ ~~'":' u~ "- rP~ 'h .. y ~ ~~- ~ ~() SEAL _.'0 .r · Market.Ai .lysis and Strategy for Downt~""n Meridian Preliminary Finding Prepared by The Hudson Company, November 18, 2003 Market Analysis and Strategy for Downtown Meridian Agenda :RECEIVED NOV 1 8 2003 lA1'f Preliminary Observations The Hudson Company November 18-19, 2003 · Project Elements · Initial Findings · Regional and Community Markets · Next steps · Discussion and Questions S ~~~~~~tr Elements of the Project · Data Collection, Analysis & Interpretation - Initial data collection, research and interviews - Presentation on Market Data & Findings for Landowners · Definition of Markets - Preparation of draft strategy - Build awareness & consensus among stakeholders, · Final Market Analysis and Market Strategy - Prepare Final Strategy & Action Plan What is Our Team Doing for You? We are helpinq to: · Understand Markets · Understand Trends · Discover Opportunities · Build a Strategy · Craft an Action Plan: - Downtown revitalization I market driven - Community wide market development - Mixed-use market integration alternatives · Guide Communication ~ The Hudson Company ~ s~ ad ~S:n ~Con:>mInity ~ The Hudson Company ~ Stn.,. ond ~ Cot &il&os: Comrn:o:ity Initial Findings From... Interviews Summary · City-Wide Priorities: - Overcome Traffic Congestion - Restore Heart of Community: Downtow -Institute Growth Management - Strengthen Sense of Community - Better Public-Private Partnership; Vision · Interviews · Population Profile · Market Analysis · Development Trends ~ The Hudson Company ~ S~.-i~~~~ ~ The Hudson Company ~ S~eosod PIonnincfo<~~ 1 Market Ai ysis and Strategy for Downtd.l Meridian Preliminary Finding Prepared by The Hudson Company, November 18, 2003 Canyon - Ada County Population Trends Canyon - Ada County Population Trends 150,000 70,000 350,000 300,000 20,000 . Nampa . Meridian rn Caldwell . Eagle . Garden Ci El Kuna Gl Middleton OSw 200,000 l~Ada~. I . Canyon Co. 60,000 *' 50,000 40,000 250,000 100,000 50,000 30,000 1970 1980 1990 2002 10,000 Key Issue: ~ASSJVE GROWTH o . . 1970 1980 ~ The Hudson Company ~ s~ ot>d ~ foe Buildin~ c..n:.n.:.,jty 1990 2002 ~ The Hudson Company ~ ~uond~(otBuildinS~11 Treasure Valley Age Makeup Meridian vv Treasure Valley Young: 30 Years Old . Highest % of Kids: 33.7% Companson of Largest Household Size: 2.93; Median Values Highest % of Familes: 500/0 (Ada=38%) 2nd Highest HH Income: $53k Eagle is $65k 2nd Lowest HH's in Poverty: 5.4% Eagle is 4.80k Lowest Housing Vacancy Highest Owner-Occupied HH's (with Eagle): 840 House Value Below County Average S. . Verv Low Ethnic Diversity . - The HUd.s:6n Company . _. s~ and ~fO-r Buil<Iint~lJ' ~ The Hudson Company ~ su",1Ie!;i.....:l ~ fot ~Cconro:nity Meridian Income as % of House Value Consumer Buying Power In the Treasure Valley ~~n{ b~~t.:C!%:~~~~~:~~~~~;r ~~:~~~~~~}~1Q6~k ~]>;t;i:i~i::~rt;~!i!;;li!!!i~~I~~~~!rilt;i;i Source: Claritas ~ C~kh....U' &8k u.rIdr.. *mp.ll AlllI Co c.~ a The Hudson Company ~ ~ on:i ~ fix I5~Co.nnu:>ity a~~~~:~~ 3 . - ... ( . Market A( lysis and Strategy for DowntL . ~-n Meridian Prelitninary Finding Prepared by The Hudson Company, November 18, 2003 Meridian's Key Trait~ Large Population: 39,067 Heavy 13-Year Growth: 2640/0 Y Dung Median Age: 30 Greatest Household Trait Families Households: Financially Well Off Demog's Very Different from Rest of Valley Low Sense of Community: Separate Neighborhoods Traditional Economy Weak: Ag/Dairy Largest Employer: School District No.2 No Clear Socio-Economic Identity Commercial Trend: Sprawl/Strip Downtown: Weak, High Potential 1$ The Hudson Company ~ Statrgic< ond f'\anaKIp; fof llul<inp;~" Treasure Valley Business Niches 0.,\'_',- _ ,<~ :::~:~_:,; :-~: ~>: <',.-- . - - -, - : ~ - ~-, L.:~: ~ ~:~: ;.r~- .-: ::~: ~~~v;: ~: ~ The Hu ~s~ - Downtown Meridian, Idaho '!~ Downtown as a Whole: Not a Competitor Strengths Act Independently -" <$l;.~, ~ The Hudson ~ompany . ~ Stale!P ot><l: ~ foe ~Cornmuo>il)" Your Strengths: · City Hall · Food & Beverage . 'UF.I.R.E." · Post Office t;1 · Schools ~ · Churches · Rail Line (Futures...) · · Access (Also Weakness) In Short, · Where you've been. is not where you're going at this time... · Your Options Are Broad " · Your Opportunities Are Substantial ~ The Hudson Company ~ S~aood~f<:,f~~ry Meridian's Anchors ~ The Hudson Company ~ ~oro~fut~~ Downtown Existing Markets · Primary Markets: Short-term - Downtown Workers - Commuters - Nearby Residents - Meridian Families - Central Valley Diners ~ The Hudson Company ~ sta.btf;ia oro ~ foe Buildinp; Cconro:nry 5 RECE1IVED NOV 1.8 2003 CITY OF MERIDIAN ! llt} " ". .. . L . . . ..' -'~ ~12~t{ ,'families: -Meridlan:is thriving,on,young families: Among Trea-sure Valley ,I: r2;'~i '~: . communities, it has tlielY.6uvg~;;~ avera~e age (30)" highest perqfmtage of,Hiqs -, < t ~ y!, (33.7J.and largest average\no,ul~ehold sl~e{2.93 peop-te).' < ~, -f ~~:W~~~~~9;,ffiyi~e4~9,;qt~@\1s~,~gmis'h":",:" .', . , ' .,-'.'" '0 ;~;:l;:' ~"'"v. -:.~;r(:^'~ ~...t~ -'A}-t-~ I -'-*~+.~"'!;i', ,'. ~{,+ CoO .~:;':4"., < ~ "< m.1:ff~ "~"'~~"f:Growth:~MeridiaNrs.growing bYe8lto 112l1'Y:;"(-' -f t , {i! )~ Op C110nS~J~r u~ye flF!J.flg~<q~~lW!ffi U~~~.Y/ 'f:/ " ~ percenj1a y~ar;..Th~ni~tIonal:rate,is l':1"Percet.ntl ;;, . , ; <':. - .~==~~~n~i~ ~~iiJr'~~ng';f;~~}fWh~~;i4 <. ,~:; ,.~;.~~~~; A':;':;;;:'" .!~ .,,;, .;. " - -4t~ j, -"":~;It. t1~i" tf~ , ", , 'j: 1 ; 1 p, : ';.'~_.H 1':'t\-7--''-<tf <....... ~ ii. < -_ i I' ~1 '7:: . '.~RIDtA:N. - Whitt: r4~1'~~at: Pub!l~me~~,iflgl,an.d re:-~.'r.. :;'.SOme'.th€m~a,b?utcio/prjori~jesem~~d' Of ~endlan,- --->.:, .1:; ~.j does tlie'fUture.hold>for > " , ~1~~1<?f f~,~+9m~_s to ,date on" a fror:n consultants interviews, with Mendlal} Here's a,summary of key- ,~.' : '": t downtowii"t:Mefidianf M~nQ~aJ2,Q1~~r~et .deve lop!!lent reslqents. , '" " . - - '. ~statjstics for Merid j an ac- - _:~ ~ ;r J,,~;: JW~llat!iJoo~w~r~!-9 > ~dY.;m:~~~~ 0;.* . _ m. >- .overcome traf!~~~~o~gestlon, '., _ cording fo<aJoarket<sJrvey _,~; ;:,) · ?,tJ!af quesJion < begins "7 ~n..~~p.lJl. Jo~~Y,1 , ~~'1:{ >' ~,~t~e,tt~r h~ft!of the communitY - - by The Hud5f?n Company. _ __ -_;' ;F' tbilig!it,:;whe~ a con~~~ >' '~~~~~l:~~~~}Y.~H~Y. .01t)~p~er~~""i:;P?~!~~!lt~~Jq Town). ~ , Ag~:"Jhe average ~ge of _. :.~ '. > 1(. , 'tant )ijl). unveil some llll- r.' N~~Q~~!~~I~~~~}~ St~; ~~~il ns~,IWte gr?wth management: '-"': a Mendlan resident 15.30 "~';: ~ t; j~~J~~i~';~:'i.Rljlti1'.i~~a~'i(J'D:rie:.-tdr.,;;,~.. '. .: '.,~ · ~;?r~;;;; i~<\ . }~~r:\:: ;;~~:'; ~:'Y2:' .' . . '~~~i':{ . : ': , .;/:': :1<, F: I ;J;{ Yfir il l~f~!::),~,~~,,~~,.";4tli"I'~~ I,A-.. ': .1I....I<:..f-I..~~~ht\~~::. ......!F~ ft -l"~:',; ',,,* U. , f.'. . V'.'.;- .' : ~.;, II u .:.!J.\"'"~(" .~a<~ :: }~r:;f -'-; ~ f,~;?-.:t : ~:~.' ~i;< I i"i , ~,- .,.~.~- j tt(':",-, !~r. .' \- --"';JJ{.o. -- i:I~"::; l ~.;: I J-: L -:1.. "J - - , J C-"l) '1....-r<- 1; 0 <.-' . . . \)~ ,~,. l':i"'; ::rl" J ~~. - ~ ...: I ~-t RECEIVED NOV l' 8 2003 om OF IvlERIDlAN I . , .., O'Q."'C" a',p..j' O'!:J 5" 8" '< '~'j U'J ('D 0 t:r' Q':I "'d t::T" ~.~ ,0 -.....:j S n .....:j a' 0 '"t:I 8" ~ t'""'1 8> S. ~ t::I" c::;L. g f1.9 r;;.o 0 ~ g~ ~-i~f~{a}~~~ :~ .,~.~E;-.'~L ".~.;"~,: ~:~ '!~}ffi ,g g 'g. d '.c::;L. ~. ~:g a .~,~.; :8 ~ E ~ ~ C1Q c::;L. ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~ 2 ~ It e ~".;6'~,;, )~o;;}~~']Z;g;" R:;e i~;:~!::!. ~ 1; !ll ~g~ ~ 'g; Q g It;l a ~.Ii: a .. If i g,. r;. z 0 "..:}. 0. g. 'i: ::3. ,,~f;:,<;,[<~~~t;~!g.~~~i~~~~,~".~g.i. ~ ~~ f !f~:i~~f~ fi ~.: ~ ~J g ~ go ~&~J ~ ~ JJ~ ~~ · ~. ~ ~~i~:~:r;.~<-r{!.':~'~: o@,~8!1~:~~: ~:~.~. ~~! R ~..,~ ~rg:.,'g; ~.~ ~ ~. .. ~ ~ ~ ~a 'g ~ n. ~ Ii ~. 1;:'~' = ::~ .~ E~;,:;,"':'a/~!~dt:P..I<""g. ~_' ~~~d~~,.'Ektn:~: (fl,: s- Jg' ..,>~__ ~.~'.~ oo,,~'- ~ ;~;..Q..'~ ,g' g."g (} '3. ~ a ~ [1t-1 q 8, p,: ~ .[-.1-1' ('tl ,:','~i:~~_~~'~'i~~L~~'~.,:[)~..'~;~'~~.r~~\~~~:'6"{~.l~~~,'i[,~:;~;,[~l~~~~tg:~',~(:et=,~ . ~ ~.B:' ~ s' a: 8><\j~~ g ! it ~,~~~~.c:g ,'l.a,,~,~6 -.-- -'..(t~B"'a' ::; 'C=' ,~. ft ~a,,"eP~ :",'(') ;ct>~' ;~'ro' (D. ~ ct, . , . (D..;~:.. a~.;:l.-:o f;(D'~ t:r' S. [ >sl 5 S' S< 0' ct 0 It.~ 0 ~ r.f& ,--;' ~ ~'~t~~:t~:-';~":~" '-.~, a -,(;' ~\~' :'!~~~ "s:':j' ~:Cn-,: 6: ~~ g;' ..' ~ ':~g~g:>Jl"~;.5!:. 'q: g :.~ ~oq" ~ ~ B"~ ~ a::-t J:l 'ni ~ ~ I f'O " ~ ~ o:~..~'a~.....:~~:.'ft'~' ~:>;'S'~O>t.:~..~~~;~:,~[;~:tn~Z~:~:~. '>~:g.:r g, ei~:, < .~~ :';g:!JCI;';,~ ~:....:~o ~g. . ~ S" 8" 8 ;; Q' 0 '~ ~ g- ~~ 6; g' ;i ~ 'g ~1'~lfo;+~,~,~~:~>>,~_,2.g-(l.._a, ,~,.-:::'~. :.0. >(D,~, '-f"+}~~'o ["0,.(/.1 0.~:~,.g- ac::;L.~ ~ (D l:S'c::;L.~~(/.I<..,~>B,.OQ ~('D o. ; c::;L. ~'~()J~'~:~'\~~'g ,:~'" ,ff,:&:'g.':E~'~:o.:a).,~'~'. ',~g.:~.g- o'd-.- '" o':-E-::&:~;; g.)g: Eo <('D '.g ,~". CD ~ g e: ~ al i- g ~ ~ O'.,a"'g Et Q ~ --~..g-<~;:'Q.l~-o8:~~Sj" ~--g.-~':'('D-.~. :[~s..!...~:---_.g ~cg.. ~~g~_. .-- a~~-g... 1> E:..: (fl ;~- (A_.CIJ -~_...:. g-~ 9 '0. I(l !1' ~::.; ~ r! g a ca ~~-('tl- '- ",0 t-~~~~-?~S~,,-.I'.'-.~(~~~~,}:~, ~(~I:~:', .': '::?~ ,~:-.; , ',I,.,~ I," <,' "_I.';. "~:"~, '. ,1,' < ~ ...... I., = - ---,-~~- 'v. "~ ~~ 0. cr a-. -a - ~.o. C1S n'~,&" s (t;o O'."C cr' "C ~:.:;! g. 8' c:l) J> a (1'0' r.f.) !iJH5..~;,8 ~~ 8": S., ~,~..g ".s~ ~1-~:t:r' 'q. a ~ ~ .8 ~..o, t-1. O. . c.' a ~ .@.' ~"~- = . !-U,~ ~ 1,1:1., ~oq' ~.r.~.~.:~ rf.;S.'a ...,:pl .So g 0- ci S ~ go ~ O.pt. _,~ 0 .; p.. = ;e "'0'.;'8" 0: ~ -~ 8"':.8' 6t>:S:: y e-"Q.. ~ g. !:; ;-, "'d 8 g S ~ ~.< ('D, ~ "d 3..a -> ~ c.. . ..~'Jl~ ~5~['g;iJ~;"~'~i:~cr ~ 's~j ;;ss a: ;l;;:,g:" ~':~. ~ 0 .i~g;'~ ~"~; ~ ,~;~~,~~:~ ~~.~;~.~~ .~. a-,~ (Jq ~ 3. ~ ~ ~: g 0 s.-<t 8..~::~ ,~,~ _.~' ,~: ~ g....... ~'~ E:r~L8-.('D. S'~?< ~:':~ g ~::P ~ 8 n 13 g: ('D ~ ~ P3 8> -8 ~- 8.. t-1 S'" . 'i~ ::e, ,~~ ~ [":@ g":,':<f~iS. (fr~,...~ ,-'~ ~ g. :g. '.~! :. ~ ~ :'~. ~ ~ ~ ~.- ('D~':p. ,8 ~ , ,,~._('D ,.F ~"8, g ~,??~~[~ g. ~~;i'_~ - e;; er'a 1=\' a .? ~ E. 0 ~~ 8, e. g 5L~ . ~ =_ ': -,,~',J?~ So s~ g_~:gl.~~~I,::. ~,..('Da.;"(fl e-~ g i 0.0 So s: ~- s=-,13 ~ ~ o:,c"o :,~. a l"I'J "......-...,..... I t-1,' ('D, O-:'C>'~Q;"',,"C-'tl:J\' '-';......,0 0 .~ Pi" . tn ('D (tI S. a- e.-- 0 o' ;'"d:5>.::g. S ~~.', ~:. g:<<~.. o(."<:--i-~-'-'I'Z' =.,~:>_. ~oo _'- a., ~_. t:l ,g ~- n, E: g :E l:S':B',~ .l:l cr . ..' 00'-; 0 ~.o OO-'('D " ."C'"" 0 0 J (D 0 e l-' .. .:;. ~ c:l) (II ..... = ~ ' :--, '- O>t .'0. (D'. ,; >'~, at ':. .~ l:S '13'0. F t:I l-rj ~ (jQ '<;; q' g !a: 51:" a- S_ >jOO~ .,0 e;: p.. . '.~=-.." {Jl:::.: S {Jl ,..;... a :to 0 ~ L..!a 0 &f n_P3 .~ ,S' 0 (II - ~'.l:r g.,:q". g::::.:: C='~ ~ s. 13 ~ g ~ ~ .. ('D d 1-" E..."'t ft:! '100 I I-t) c::;L. 0 _ ('D -' ~~~ 0,-, -...... I 1 u I I P _ o;n >=i O>t "1 o;n l'(fl ,~,... z o <:: ,. (t) ~ ~ l-I- ~ fIj 0' o c.v .~ 4 .~ ~ (t) ~ '.~ ~ .f::.. CJ1 { Market.N. , Jysis and Strategy for DowntG~tn Meridian Preliminary Finding Prepared by The Hudson Company, November 18,2003 Next Steps Comments & Questions · Address Future Markets, SupplYJ Competition · Prepare Marketing Vision · Prepare, Refine Draft Strategy · Finalize Market Strategy Prepare Action Plan - VWWVVVHW ~ The Hudson Company ~ Stntc6n ot>d ~ for lluildin~ Community ~ The Hudson Company ~ Suoq;e. o.nd ~ for B~ c.:...-.n;ry Mix a Iittk Joo/ishms; JJith)'OHr mi4us pkmr. it's /mJt!J to bt dl!J at the n"gbt mommt. - Horace 7 ( Join us in setting the course for RECEIV"ED NOV 1 8 2003 CITY OF MERIDlAi~ The Progress Continues! "--' n,QQl,~1\2~~\ u oowntown Meridlall: ~\Gh Way to the FUfll"e~ 1fI ~., ,J" ~l!i~~'~'~"'~T~.- ~. 4f ~"~'. ,1;~~~ 'L~'-: - ~~ , lif_ ~~: ~.~': - ' , ' ~'" - ..;' -~ ~-i!; <~;.i' ~ . ill! a~-' , .... ,_ .-'rl'-.:;-:. ._ ,',___ ><'~~ ' .?:~ ::;~rH'~:-<~I.~ 'tEf ~-. ~ J\'; ~:C~:I:~",~~ ; :::~-:""i :.....40,,,:-' -jr';~/-~ _:. ~ ~~!Ii R'efte'~f1m", ' ," t ,.~ -'. "..0, ,- ,-' .- "e,-l1' ~~- ,'.' . ". ': ' I J< ,';. ~ r, : ~ ~~- - . ~ ~ ..... _" -i: , - "" ',~,~o!~ Public Workshop and Open House; Markets, Competition & Development Options When: Tuesday, November 18, 7-9 pm Where: Valley Shepherd Nazarene Church 831 Main Street (Fellowship Hall) Meridian A great cOInIIlunity needs a great downtown center" Y our City leaders invite you to participate in a Public Workshop and Open House to m.ap our downtown's future.. COIne' see what sim.ilar cities have done, learn about our markets, and look at our cOlTIpetition. Share your own priorities for the future. We're building a vision, a team and a strategy to revitalize downtown. We need your guidance~ Please join us! For More Information, Please Call: City Dept. of Planning and Zoning, (208) 884-5533 , ( November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT Pre-Council Meeting November 18, 2003 ITEM NO. 3 REQUEST Presentation of Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Flier ;- ~~ Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. The Progress Continues! Join us in setting the course for oo""ntown MeridlalJ: .~,,\ch Way to the Fllfll" ~ 8p :) Rdt~.CC'_~i' ,'I .. , f! ~ .~, ..,.,...,,' I~. _oj :;t -n t. ~~ l)~,~t {t\1lb~~ Public Workshop and Open House: Markets, Competition & Deve lopment Options When: Tuesday, November 18,7-9 pm Where: Valley Shepherd Nazarene Church 831 Main Street (Fellowship Hall) Meridian A great comInunity needs a great downtown center. Your City leaders invite you to participate in a Public Workshop and Open House to map our downtown's future. COIne see what silllilar cities have done, learn about our markets, and look at our competition. Share your own priorities for the future. We're building a vision, a teatn and a strategy to revitalize downtown. We need your guidance. Please join us! For More Information, Please Call: City Dept. of Planning and Zoning, (208) 884-5533 Page 1 of 1 Sharon Smith From: Steve Siddoway [siddowas@meridiancity.org] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:04 PM To: bergw@meridiancity.org; 'Sharon Smith'; corrieb@meridiancity.org Cc: 'Anna Powell'; 'Tom Hudson' Subject: Pre Council 11/18 I would like to request a time slot from 6:00 to 6:30 PM on Tuesday, November 18 for a Pre-Council presentation by the Hudson Company regarding the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy. We cannot go later than 6:30 because we need to leave in time for a 7:00 public open house/workshop on the same topic. Anna is considering other items for the Council to fill the 6:30 to 7:00 time slot. The purpose of the presentation will be to update the Council on what was learned from the interviews conducted last month, as well as an overview of the market research done to date. Please call me if you have any questions. Attached is a flyer regarding the public open house. FROM THE DESK OF... Steve Siddoway Meridian Planning & Zoning 660 E. Wateltower Lane, Suite 202 Meridian,ID 83642 phone: (208) 884M5533 fax: (208) 888-6854 email: siddowas@lneridiancity.org 11/12/2003 .Page I ot I Will Berg From: Steve Siddoway [siddowas@rneridiancity .org] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:04 PM To: bergw@meridiancity.org; 'Sharon Smith'; Cc: 'Anna Powell'; 'Tom Hudson' Subject: Pre Council 11/18 I would like to request a time slot from 6:00 to 6:30 PM on Tuesday, November 18 for a Pre-Council presentation by the Hudson Company regarding the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy. We cannot go later than 6:30 because we need to leave in time for a 7:00 public open house/workshop on the same topic. Anna is considering other items for the Council to fill the 6:30 to 7:00 time slot. The purpose of the presentation will be to update the Council on what was learned from the interviews conducted last month, as weU as an overview of the market research done to date. Please call me if you have any questions. Attached is a flyer regarding the public open house. FROM THE DESK OF... Steve Siddoway Meridian Planning & Zoning 660 E. Watertower Lane, Suite 202 Meridian, ID 83642 phone: (208) 884-5533 fax: (208) 888-6854 email: siddowasr0tneridiancitv.org 11/11/2003 The Progress Continues! Join us in setting the course for oo_ntown Meridlall: ..*,,,\cb Way to the FUfll" ~ 8P t;~ j'!-:'fl- j~i-f 'h 5). J - ..' ~. ..'~. , ,'. " 1 \~, 11l€sm.'IJ:11I\f! Ii "' ," ,; t ,i1{,;1.lJ1dS},i ,-. s\~\ "',y i)'T.-. '-:~li\1\~~\~~: J:) \ 1 \~J\t ~: ,;.. < ~. ~ ........ ~.. ...-- ::;;,:~_ri. ,-"T~- Public Workshop and Open House: Markets, Competition & Development Options When: Tuesday, November 18, 7-9 pm Where: Valley Shepherd Nazarene Church 831 Main Street (Fellowship Ball) Meridian A great cOIIllD.unity needs a great downtown center. Your City leaders invite you to participate in a Public Workshop and Open House to map our downtown's future. Corne see what similar cities have done, leam about our lllarkets, and look at our cOIllpetition. Share your own priorities for the future. We're building a vision, a team and a strategy to revitalize downtown. We need your guidance. Please join us! For More Information, Please Call: City Dept. of Planning and Zoning, (208) 884-5533 November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT Pre-Council Meeting November 18, 2003 ITEM NO. 4 REQUEST Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345(1) (c) and (f): AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SElTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( ? l1C<.Se .]JoSf :f;y fJubt:c no-h'Ce -- /hM7~&( CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: (30 minutes*) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): (20 minutes*) *Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Meridian City Council Agenda - November 18,2003 Page 1 of I All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 I' ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 11/14 17:13 PUBLIC WORKS 11/14 17:14 2084664405 11/14 17:15 8841159 11/14 17:16 2088840744 11/14 17:16 POLICE DEPT 11/14 17:17 8985501 11/14 17:18 LIBRARY 11/14 17:19 92083776449 11/14 17:20 208 388 6924 11/14 17:21 2088886854 11/14 17:22 ALL AMERICAN INS 11/14 17:22 208 895 0390 11/14 17:25 208 387 6393 11/14 17:25 ADA CTY DEUELMT 11/14 17:27 8885052 11/14 17:28 CHERRY LANE 11/14 17:29 POST OFFICE 11/14 17:30 IDAHO ATHLETIC C 11/14 17:31 ID PRESS TRIBUNE 11/14 17:32 2088886701 11/14 17:36 3810160 AS OF NOU 14 '03 17:45 PAGE. 01 MODE EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--5 EC--S EC--S 83--5 EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S CITY OF MERIDIAN MIN/SEC PGS 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'21" 001 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'21" 001 00'21" 001 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'20" 001 00'20" 001 00'20" 001 00'20" 001 00' 38" 001 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'27" 001 00' 18" 001 00'19" 001 00' 18" 001 00'26" 001 CMD~ 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 STATUS OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rp LeCC)e POSt Prr Pubt:(, {%,& - /~M[f;S{ CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCil MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless Mayor Robert Corrie BilJ Nary Kejth Bird 2. Adoption of the Agenda; 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: (30 minutes*) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): (20 minutes*) 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 \ ** COMMUNICATIONS REPORT ** TOTAL PAGES SEND 0031 RECEIIJE 0001 DATE TIME TO/FROM 11/14 08:40 2083730504 11/14 10:00 8889936 11/14 17:13 PUBLIC WORKS 11/14 17:14 2084664405 11/14 17:15 8841159 11/14 17:16 2088840744 11/14 17:16 POLICE DEPT 11/14 17:17 8985501 11/14 17:18 LIBRARY 11/14 17:19 92083776449 11/14 17:20 208 388 6924 11/14 17:21 2088886854 11/14 17:22 ALL AMERICAN INS 11/14 17:22 208 895 0390 11/14 17:25 208 387 6393 11/14 17:25 ADA CTY DEVELMT 11/14 17:27 8885052 11/14 17:28 CHERRY LANE 11/14 17:29 POST OFFICE 11/14 17:30 IDAHO ATHLETIC C 11/14 17:31 ID PRESS TRIBUNE 11/14 17:32 2088886701 11/14 17:33 PUBLIC WORKS 11/14 17:34 12084664405 11/14 17:36 3810160 11/14 17:37 8841159 11/14 17:39 2088840744 11/14 17:40 POLICE DEPT 11/14 17:41 8985501 11/14 17:43 LIBRARY 11/14 17:44 92083776449 11/14 17:45 208 388 6924 MODE EC--p EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--5 G3--5 EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S AS OF NOV 14 '03 17:45 PAGE. 01 TOTAL TIME CITY OF MERIDIAN SEND 00011'39" RECEIVE 00000'39" MIN/SEC PGS 00'39" 001 00'19" 001 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'21" 001 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'21" 001 00'21" 001 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'20" 001 00'20" 001 00'20" 001 00'20" 001 00'38" 001 00'20" 001 00'21" 001 00'27" 001 00' 18" 001 00'19" 001 00'18" 001 00'24" 001 00 ' 26" 001 00'26" 001 00'24" 001 00'25" 001 00'25" 001 00'24" 001 00'28" 001 00'24" 001 00'27" 001 CMDt:f 069 070 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 072 073 073 072 073 073 073 073 073 073 073 STATUS OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK I. ** COMMUNICATIONS REPORT ** TOTAL PAGES SEND 0000 RECEIVE 0001 DATE TIME TO/FROM 01 11/15 09:01 2083730504 ( AS OF NOV 16 '03 05:00 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN TOTAL TIME SEND 00000'00" RECEIVE 00000'33" MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC ":"-R 00' 33" 001 084 OK ( ** TX CONFIR'I'lll-I'ION REPORT ** AS OF NOV 19 '03 15:47 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS DATE TIME 072 OK EC S 00'20" 001 28 11/19 15:47 Laurel __ ___________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'P Lee&. POSt fry fJuht..C tWI,"ee.- /~M[f;S( CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6;00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. RoJJ-caU Attendance: Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird _ Mayor Robert Corrje 2. Adoption of the Agenda; 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company; (30 minutes*) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): (20 minutes*) *Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending On discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Meridian City Council Agcncb - N overnber 18~ 2003 Page 1 of 1 All matcrinls pr~mtcd at public meetings shall become prOpr:rly of the City of Meridjan. Anyon.e dtsiring ilCCornulodation for disabilities re1:1~d to documents and/or hearings ph:3se contacn the City C1erk'~ Office ~t 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior [0 ~lC public meeling. ( ** TX CONF I R, " I ( I ON REPORT ** / \ AS OF NOV 17 '03 14:54 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDij STATUS EC--S 00' 20" 001 087 OK ----~~---==~=~-=~~==_:~~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------- 'P Lta.se 'POSt j;y Pubt:c. noh.& -- /htW[~s{ CITY OF MERlDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. RolI...calJ Attendance: - Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary - Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird -- Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: (30 minutes*) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f)~ (20 minutes*') *ApprOXimate allowable time set for agenda Item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Mcridinn City Council Agenda - Novcmb~ 18,2003 Page: J of 1 All materiab pr~ at publio meetings shall becoll\C propmy ofl.hc City of Meridian. Anyone desiring sccommodaliQll for diS<lbilitics relaled to documenTS andror baling. please contact l.bc CilyOc:r!::'s Office M 888-4433 atlC36t 48 hours prior to !be public meeting. { ** TX CONFIRI'IMTION REPORT ** AS OF NOU 14 '03 17:47 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS 01 11/14 17:47 CHAMBER-COMMERCE ----5 00'00" 000 072 BUSY THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1J Le~e POSt j;y flub&:c nvt,'Ce" Ihtwtk-S( CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6;00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: - Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary - Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird -- Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda; 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company; (30 minutes.) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67.2345 (1) (c) and (I): (20 minutes*) *Approximate alJowable time set for agenda item may change depending On discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Mt::ridisn City Council Agc:nd~ - November 1 S, 2003 Page 1 of 1 All ma1.mals pr~~ted aT pubJic meetings shall become J'1"Opl:Tly of the City ofMC'Tidian. AnYOQ~ desiring accornulodalion mr dl:>:lbiliti", relat~ to doclltIlalts 8.ldIor hearing. plC3se contact the City Clerk'. Office al 888-4433 all= 48 hours prior /0 thc public meeting. f ** TX CONFli. 1TION REPORT ** AS OF NOU 17 '03 08:44 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MINVSEC PGS CMDij STATUS 102 11/17 108: 44 CHAMBER-COMMERCE ----S 00' 00" 1000 1087 BUSY , THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rp Lea:se 'POSt j;y fJub&:c nv;,"&. -- ihtWff::-st CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TueSday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. RoIJ..caJl Attendance: - Tammy de Weerd __ Bill Nary - Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird -- Mayor Robert Corrie 2. AdoPtion of the Agenda: 3. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: (30 minutes*) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): (20 minutes"") *ApproXimate allowable time set for agenda Item may change depending on discussion. Please Use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Meridian City Council Agcnd3 - Novcl1lbtr 18, 2003 Page I of 1 All materials pr~CIIk:d ar public meering,l9hall become p1Cpmy oflbc City of Meridian. Any01lc dcsiriDg accommodatic.n for djS:lbiJitics related fO documents andfor h<:3rings please C"'lIaO[ the City Clerk:' s 0 [fi cc ., t 888-4433 a lleast 48 hows prior to the publJc mcctioll. MAYOR Robert D. Con'ie ?lfat . ?O${ f,y rubu;Cr::{;;~~-I/ 1rg( oU; CITY OF ~:i~~iflHE d 1'--'--. + -;::~Ji+__ ~"~ -~t..:'-,.H II .... ......\ eri lanAi \, IDAHO l ~? / QrNCE '.1903 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd \VilIiam L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272. FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 · Fax 898-5501 PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 · Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 · Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 · Fax 888-6854 NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be discussing the following agenda items: -- Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company -- Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is closed to the public, however, the public is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. \\\\\11111111/11 \\\\ 1:: IS.-. 1I11 ,,"...1 Of W!it:.!f;" '1// " ~, "V~ ......... ~ ,.... () ~PCFl "'v ~.... ~ 00 ~~ ~ ~ '$~ (:) ~ 8hMmJrYk1h1 SEAL 1 .- &' 2 WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - CtrX, ~K "C!) 0 ~~ ~'6 '&'1S\ · .~ ~~ ~ :;oG' .h.... .... /..... -Te, ~\ ...........' ~/J' 0: !fI:.ATV <,'- III ......v. 1 t \\\ III;;, , ,..\\\ : , If J ~ f i ~ ~ \ 1 ' DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE · MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 · (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 · Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 · Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 MAYOR Robert D. Con-ie ,;;1>, ~t:~~~t1 1~~i1il7ilfI.1r~ clfe;;dl;;'~f; .~. IDAHO '~, \1 V } / ):( b7 / QmcE \ 1903 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 · FAX 466-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) 888-3579 · Fax 898-550 I PUBLIC WORKS (208) 898-5500 · Fax 887-1297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211 · Fax 887-1297 PLANNING & ZONING (208) 884-5533 · Fax 888-6854 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd \Villiam L. M. Nary Cherie McCandless Keith Bird NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be discussing the following agenda items: -- Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company -- Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is closed to the public, however, the public is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. \\\\\\1I1f111111 \\\\ C M..... 1111 ....'\\\....f Of l:::.f?;r.. /1/ ", ~, "V~ //.....,..,. $" a (Jof\PCf1-4 h ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ 8hWtmSrnt1h( "SEAL \ .- 9?"- WILLIAM G. BERG, JR. - Clf{Y-;'o ~'!<1S\ . ,0)'0 ,f ~/ ~ ~ ......... ..... /.... a \.<)' "..... 1'/..../ 0: f~_lT'{ ,\ \<\' II; ..... r" ~ \ \ \ liJi/U1H .:~\~;..\\ 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE · MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 · (208) 888-4433 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 · Human Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 · Finance & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 I ** TX CONF I Rl, . ION REPORT ** (-- AS OF NOU 17 '03 15:56 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC S 00'21" 001 105 OK 06 11/17 15:56 laurel __ _____________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P leCt.Se POs+ fry Pub-lie. nO{-/CR.'- /hM[~s( CITY OF MERIDIAN PRE-COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 16, 2003 at 6;00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roff..caJl Attendance: - Tammy de Weerd _ Bill Nary Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird - Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3_ Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company: (30 minutes*) 4. Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f): (20 minutes*) "Approximate allowable time set for agenda item may change depending on discussion. Please use the designated minutes as a guideline only. Mcridinn City Council AgendiJ - November 18,2003 Page 1 of J AllnH1tcrials presented at public meetings shall becoule propcny otthe City of Meridian. Anyone ~ 3CCommodaonn for disabilities rel.tod to docwnClllS and/or bearings plcase eO~Cllhe City Clerk's Office" I 888-4433 .1 least 48 ho urn prior to the publ ic meeting. r ** TX CONF I R,. . ION REPORT ** AS OF NOU 17 '03 15:57 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 07 11/17 15:57 laurel MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC--S 00'24" 001 106 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MA YOR Robert D. Conic 'P~~t ?O${ f,y ?uhlicflti .~,' -IhMfxg( ~l ;'''r'~-''::~ r '..; ~.,... !.",(f',,~;: i' f".... ~ r CITHlF fi~!~" '-Nlerldltrn'''-lC -.'\ ~ IDAHO l~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~.-.&L.$'o( LE(jAL DEPARTMENT (20X) 466-9272 · FAX 466.4405 PARKS &: RECREATION (208) 888-3579 · F:lX 898-5501 PUaLfC WORKS (203) 898.5500 · Fnx RX7-1297 BUJLDtNG 1)llPARTtvIENi (2U~) 887-2211 · Fax 88"1. J 297 PL.J\NNING &. ZONlNG (208) 884.553:; · F.:.x 8H~-6HS4 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Weerd WiJliam L M. Nary Cherie MCCillldles$ Keith Bird --~'- NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council win be discussing the foJlowing agenda items: - Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market strategy by the Hudson Company - Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is closed to the public, however, the public is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. 33 EAST iDAHO AVENUE · MbRlDIAN\ IDAliO 83642 · (208) 888..4433 City Cle,'k Office Fnx (208) 888-421 S .. Ilumnn ResOUl'ce~ Fax (208) 884..8723 · Finance & Utili[y Billing Fax (208) 887..4813 1 ** TX CONFIRI to ,j ION REPORT ** AS OF NOU 17 '03 14:53 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 01 11/17 14:52 Laurel MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDij STATUS EC--S 00'25" 001 086 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MA YOR RObel'r D. COn'ie 'PlLa..se 'POSi fry Puh4'cr:t:~-1h/Mt[r~( iJI.,. ,. )ti...;~ tr'ir .. ~'~mn:1~r clfe;;dl;~~:; ""1 ~ IDAHO .f L, ':~'\~ . ~8eN:UF\~ ,~~ LEGAL DEPARTMGNT (208) 466.9272 · FAX 466.4405 PARKS & RECREATfON (208) S88~35"/9 . Fax. 898-5501 PUBL!C \.vURKS (20g) ~'JS-SSOO · Fax 8S7~ 1297 BUlI,.D1NG DEPARTMENT (20g) Kln-22 1 I · Fax HX7 ~ 1297 PLA.NNING & ZONING (203) $84-5533 . Fux 888-6854 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de We~l"d Wtlham L. M. Nary CherIe McCandless Kcilh Bird NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be discussing the following agenda items: - Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market strategy by the Hudson Company - Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2346 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is closed to the public, however, the public is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. 33 .CAST IDAHO AVENUE · MERIDIAN, IDArIC 83642 . (208) 888-4433 C:iry Clerk Oftice Fax (208) 888-4218 · Hurnen Rcs()ul'~'Cs Fal( (208) 884-8723 · Finance & Utility Billing Fa;( (208) 8X7-41) 13 ( ** TX CONFI~ .ION REPORT ** AS OF NOU 17 '03 08:43 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/5EC PGS CMD~ STATUS 01 11/17 08:43 CHAMBER-COMMERCE ----5 00'00" 000 086 BUSY THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR Rnbel'r O. COrl'ie 'PliA.Se 'POS-t f,y PuhiA:cflJt'ff;;{ 1it~I~[ ;oi . ~ ~~~:. 1J,"( ~~~~~1i"~ Dlfe;;dl;~~f; "..~ ~ IDAHO .1 ,.t, ,), R , ~~ . V", .' LEG^L DEPARTMGNT (208) 4(ifj.9272 · FAX 466.4405 PARKS & RECREATH1N (208) 888.35"/9 .. Fax 898.5501 PUBLIC WORKS (ZO~) :::'.1$.5500 · Fax SS7-1297 BUfl..DING DRPARTM8NT (20M) K87-22 I I · Fox HX7.12lJ7 PLANNING & ZONING (20:3) 884-5533 . Fux 888-6854 CITY COUNCIL MEMBEt{S Tammy de Wterd Wtlllam L. tvJ. NfHY Chel'Je McCarldless Keith Bird NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall. 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday. Novembe.-18, 2003 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be discussing the following agenda items: - Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market strategy by the Hudson Company - Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is closed to the public, however, the public is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. .... '.. 33 cAST IDAHO AVENUE · MERIDTAN, IDAJIO 83642 . (208) 888.4433 C:i I Y Clcrk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 · Hu rno n R csoun.'Cs Fax (208) 884-8723 · Finance & Utili [)' Billing Fax (2011) 8K7 -41) f 3 **Txd ~T ION REPORT ** AS OF t-.OV 14 '03 18: 16 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TI~ TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS 02 11/14 17:47 2088S86854 EC--S 00' 24" 001 073 OK 03 11/14 17:48 ALL AMERICAN INS EC--S 00' 24" 001 073 OK 1214 11/14 17:49 208 895 0390 EC--S 00'24" 001 073 OK 0S 11/14 17:51 208 387 6393 EC--S 00'24" 001 073 OK 06 11/14 17:52 ADA CTY DEVELMT G3--S 00'41" 001 073 OK 07 11/14 17:54 8885052 EC--S 00'24" 001 073 OK 08 11/14 17: 55 CHERRY LANE EC--S 00' 29" 001 073 OK 09 11/14 17:56 POST OFFICE EC--S 00' 33" 001 073 OK 10 11/14 17:57 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 00' 24" 01211 073 OK 11 11/14 17:58 887 0816 G3--S 00' 42" 001 073 OK 12 11/14 17:59 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--5 00' 24" 001 073 OK 13 11/14 18:00 2088886701 EC--S 00'24" 001 073 OK 16 11/14 18:04 3810160 EC--S 00' 34" 1301 073 OK 23 11/14 18:16 CHAMBER-COMMERCE ----5 00' 00" 000 073 BUSY THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MA YOR Rob!rt D. Corrie 'Plia.se 'PoSt fry PuhflCf}tJf;{ lha41Ig[ ir .)J\~~\~~ C>f1e;;dl;;~'~ ~, ~ IDAHO )~ ~~ Co ./'l" ~ft ~ oIl~ iltl':,v.:lJ~ffi . ?~ LfGAL lJL.:PARTM ENT (208) 46G.9212 . FAX 406-4405 PARKS & RECREATION (208) nX~.3579 · FJx X98.5501 PUBLIC WORKS (20H) SlJ8-SS00 · ru~ IHi7. J 297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (u)8) 887-221l ~ Fax 887-1297 PLANNIN(j & ZONING (20R) XSd-SS:;;; · F~x R88.68:5d CJTY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy dE: We~rd William L. M. No.ry Cherie McCandle~s Keith Bird NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDJAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, November 18,2003 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be discussing the following agenda items: - Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company - Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is dosed to the public, however, the public is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE · MERIDIAN. lDAHO 83642 . (208) 8B8-44~3 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 - Ilum'!n Resources Fax (208) 884.8723 . Finance &. Ulility BilIing Fux (208) 887-4813 ** TX c0t4'- ,AT I ON REPORT ** AS OF NOV 14 '1213 17:45 PAGE.0l CITY OF MERIDIAN 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 DATE TIME TO/FROM 11/14 17:33 PUBLIC WORKS 11/14 17:34 12084664405 11/14 17:37 8841159 11/14 17:39 2088840744 11/14 17:40 POLICE DEPT 11/14 17:41 8985501 11/14 17:43 LIBRARY 11/14 17:44 92083776449 11/14 17:45 208 388 6924 MODE EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S EC--S MIN/SEC PGS 00" 24" 001 00' 26" 001 00" 24" 00'1 00'25" 001 1210'25" 001 121121'24" 12101 1210'28" 001 00'24" 001 0121'27" 12101 CMDti 0'73 073 073 073 073 073 073 073 073 STATUS OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR Robert D. COl'rle 'PlLttse 70$1; -& ?()hliCfJt!ft:;-1AtWf,rg{ ~ .~n~ti~'~~ oU; (;ITY o~ If~l~l~ ~ 0.:1.1 .,~.. erldian ~-; ~~ ~ IDAHO )1 1'/ ~~ L-!/ C'1;o..." ~"ik!B~''SJ~1....~ f~ LeGAL L>lWARTMENT (208) d(j(i-9272 · FAX -+66-4405 PARKS & RSCREATrON (200) ftXR-3579 · F:Ili: Xt)~.5501 PUBLIC: WORKS (~O~) ::;98-5500 · I:ux ~~7 - J 297 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-221 I .. Fax 887- J 297 PLANNING & ZONING (20R) X&1.-553.1 · FJX ;;;:88-6854 CITY COUNCIL tvlEMBERS TllJnmy de WeeI'd WilHam L. M, N::J.~j Cherie McCandless Keith Bm:J NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 P.M. The Meridian City Council will be discussing the following agenda items: - Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market strategy by the Hudson Company - Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is closed to the public, however, the pUblic is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. MERIDIAN.lDAHO 83642. (208) 888-4433 Cily Colcrk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 · IlulTlun Resources Fax (208) 884-8723 . FinanCe & Utility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 ( ** TX CONF I Rt;" ., ION REPORT ** (-- AS OF NOU 19 '03 15:48 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 29 11/19 15=48 Laurel MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC--S 00' 24" 001 073 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MA YOR Robert D. Corrie ?lLa.se 'POS-t fry Pubac~~ftJ-1hfMt[rg( ~ ;.n~~:~ ~ P r c;rrv 0'> Ijri1S~~ '-NLerldian .,~) ....~I IDAHO )' ).'/ ,t,f/ ../" !R~~A..-.:r I~l....~ i?:M LEGAL DL.;PARTM ENT (208) 466,9272 .. FAX 466-1-405 PAR KS & RECREATION (20~n ~~Hl:.357t) · F:::I x xt)~ -550 t PUBLIC \VORKS (.~O~) S\)8-5500. Fux H~7-1 297 BUILDING DEP^RTlvlENT (208) 887.221 I" Fox 887"J297 PLANNING & ZONING (20R) XR<1.-5:53:; · F:lx R88-685d CiTY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy de Wee-I'd William L. M. Nary Cherie McCandleS$ Keith BIrd NOTICE OF PRE-COUNCIL MEETING MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a Pre-Council Meeting at City Hall, 33 East Idaho. Meridian, Idaho, on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 6:00 P.M.. The Meridian City Council will be discussing the following agenda items: -. Presentation of the Downtown Revitalization Market Strategy by the Hudson Company - Executive Session per Idaho Code 67-2345 (1) (c) and (f) The Executive Session is closed to the public, however, the public is welcome to attend the remainder of the meeting. DATED this 14th day of November, 2003. 33 EAST IDAHO AVENUE. .. MERIDIAN. lDA.HO 83642 · (208) R88~4433 Ciry ~1c::rk Office Fax (208) 888~42 J H · IltJm~n Resources Fax (208) 884.8723 · Fin~nce & Ulility Billing Fax (208) 887-4813 ( CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18,2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: ~ Tammy de Weerd ~( Bill Nary ~ Cherie McCandless X Keith Bird o Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: ~'fTY'Pf/Ie a,[ ulnen-de:c;U 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: ~VU-- B. Beer I Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to Mugsy's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: arpe7l/\-C-' C. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: app~ D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: tf..f>fV&~ E. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: afjiYl/v'e.- F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No. 3 - The Ewing Company: a, fJY'o v..e- G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: PjPpY77//IL- H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: alprvV'C.- I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: at r V\.(.-- Meridian City Council Agenda -November 18,2003 Page 1 of2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 4. Department Reports: 1'lAJ~ 5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) yV-Oh L 6. Continued from November 12,2003 Pre-Council Meeting: Discussion ofWestborouah Subdivision Sewer Service Request: d-7pJ?VL tVIC()PLdih~ 7. FP 03-059 Request for Final Plat approval of 1 00 single-family residential building lots and 5 common lots on 36.66 acres in a R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No.2 by Tuscany Development, Inc. - between South Locust Grove Road and South Eagle Road, south of East Victory Road: a;:>jJYV~~ 8. FP 03-060 Request for Final Plat approval of 6 common lots on 1.67 acres in an R-4 zone for Tuscanv Lakes Subdivision No.2 by Tuscany Development, Inc. - east of South Locust Grove Road and south of East Victory Road: /fro~-e.... 9. FP 03-061 Request for Final Plat approval of 63 single-family residential building lots and 1 0 common lots on 25.78 acres in an R-8 zone for Kellv Creek Subdivision No.1 by Kevin Howell Construction - northwest corner of North Linder Road and West McMillan Road: tblprtJl/.fL- 10. TE 03-007 Request for a Time Extension for Recording the Final Plat for Drawbridae Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - west of North Ten Mile Road and south of West McMillan Road: dj'jJ//Jr/L.- /tJ /2-1-04 11. Continued Public Hearing from November 12, 2003: CUP 03-047 Request for a Conditional Use Permit to demolish existing home and rebuild one single family residential dwelling for caretakers quarters on lot 2, block 2 of Observation Point Subdivision in a R-4 zone by RF Construction - 500 East Victory Road: ~t:rhn~-~ decrT/~ r'o /2--c(--03 12. Public Hearing: CUP 03-042 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Carl's Jr. restaurant with drive-thru service window by Clayton Jones - north of Intersection of South Meridian Road, East Central Drive and South Main Street: tfll/-trrne'j fo jN'tjJtvt.R- ./'If € e/-t ft;r den; a-e... 13. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: (/~~ I~.- EKe~f;~VLJe.rJ/~~ 67--2.7'f~-1-6 /1...0 d.e Cr;!] ; - ~ Meridian City Council Agenda -November 18,2003 Page 2 of2 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: C1TY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: ~vV Contacted: Emailed: Date: staff Initials: Material. presented at public ma.tlngs shall become property of the City of Meridian. Phone: Meridian City Council Meetinq November 18, 2003 The regular meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, November 12,2003, by Council President Tammy de Weerd. Members Present: Tammy de Weerd, William Nary, Keith Bird, and Cherie McCandless. Members Absent: Mayor Robert Corrie. Others Present: Jill Holinka, Will Berg, Anna Powell, Brad Watson, Gary Smith, Kenny Bowers, Bill Musser, and Dean Willis. Item 1. Roll-call Attendance: X Tammy de Weerd X Cherie McCandless X Bill Nary X Keith Bird Robert Corrie De Weerd: Okay. I will go ahead and call the regular meeting of City Council, November 18th, to order and we will ask the city clerk to call roll-call attendance. Item 2. Adoption of the Agenda: De Weerd: Thank you. Item No.2, adoption of the agenda. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we -- with the permission of the rest of the Council, that we have an Item 14 -- add an Item 14, an executive session, as per Idaho Code 67 -2345, (1 )(c). I believe that's -- no. B. (1 )(b) instead of -- Madam President. And with that, I don't believe there is any -- unless I haven't been told anything being taken off or added other than that, so I would move that we adopt the amended agenda. McCandless: Second. Nary: Second. Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Isn't Item 13 deleted now, though? Bird: No. It's just -- there is a change in the date. Nary: Oh. Okay. We are going to do it, but change the date. I got it. Thank you. Sorry. Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 2 of 58 De Weerd: Okay. Any other changes? Discussion? Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve the adoption with the addition of an Item 14 per Idaho State Code 67 -2345(1 )(b). All those in favor say aye. Okay. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer I Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to MUQsv's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: c. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: E. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 - The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: De Weerd: Item 3, Consent Agenda. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we approve the Consent Agenda as published and for the Council President to sign and the Clerk attest on all proper papers. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Ifs been moved and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda, with the Mayor -- or Council President to sign and Clerk attest. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll? ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 3 of 58 Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 4. Department Reports: De Weerd: Thank you. Item 4, Department Reports. Are there any Department Reports? Just thought lid ask. Thank you. Item 5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) De Weerd: Okay. There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. Item 6. Continued from November 12, 2003 Pre-Council Meeting: Discussion of Westborou~h Subdivision Sewer Service Request: De Weerd: So, we will move to No.6, continued from November 12th, pre-Council meeting discussion of Westborough Subdivision sewer service request. And Bruce -- Brad -- Public Works. Watson: Madam President, Council Members, the one thing that I was directed to do last Tuesday night was prepare a vicinity map that showed the location of the proposed Westborough Subdivision -- well, actually, it's not proposed anymore, it's recorded. But, the proposal to provide city sewer to the five residential lots within that subdivision. This is that map up on the wall. Inside this bright yellow outline is Westborough Subdivision. In the upper right corner, the northeastern corner is the Valley Life Community Church, which the City has already agreed to provide water and sewer service to. The southern -- large southern parcel is Meridian School District property, which we have also agreed to provide water and sewer service to. Along the western boundary over here are the five residential lots and up in the northwest corner is a future commercial lot that is not part of the current proposal. We have not -- they have not requested and we have not agreed to provide water and sewer service to that parcel that lot at this time. Last week I discussed an upcoming application that you have not seen or heard, but is in our pipeline and it's this proposed Saguaro Canyon Subdivision. It's the one that I mentioned would ultimately bring sewer within an eighth of a mile of their property. This is Meridian Road here on the left. Locust Grove to the right. You can sort of make out Vienna Woods Subdivision down in this lower right corner. I can answer any questions on that map. I would point out that Mr. Jewett provided some -- three documents to me today. I made hard copies of those, gave those to the clerk and, hopefully, those have been passed out. One is a consent to annexation form. I have not had time to thoroughly digest it, b ut ita ppears to b e something t hat a buyer of t hose lots wauld execute. Its imply warns them that t hey a re being p ravided s ewer a nd - - water a nd sewer service and are subject to annexation. The second two forms are, evidently, real estate -- or realtor forms that I'm not familiar with at all. On my copy there are a couple of sections that highlighted. On the RE 22 form, a Purchase and Sales Agreement for Presold New Construction, Item 15, about a third of the way down the page is what they highlighted for me regarding annexation and city services. And then the next page, RE ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 4 of 58 25, a Seller's Property 0 isclosure form t here a re three numbered sentences a bout a third of the way down. They are labeled one, two and three and they discuss whether a property is receiving city services or subject to future annexation. I don't know the value of these documents. Those were provided to me. I took a brief look through those. Mr. Jewett is here tonight and he would be able to answer any questions on those better than I can and I will be quiet unless you have any questions of me. De Weerd: Any questions? Okay. Mr. Jewett. Maybe you could take the microphone and stand in the back of the room. Jewett: I'll stand right here. De Weerd: Please state your name and address. Jewett: My whole family has got the flu and I'm -- Jim Jewett, 3654 South Rustler in Meridian. The documents I provided Brad were just a copy of our standard real estate documents. I'm a realtor. I belong to the realtor's association and with some of the issues that have happened in Boise, we set out to change real estate documents when we buy and sell property, to notify property owners. So I'm hoping to answer some of your questions from last week, how dot hese property 0 wners g et notified a nd that's what this document is, to show you that and that we have taken steps as a board, a realtor board, to make sure that in all real estate contracts are documents saying you would get services and if you do are you subject to annexation. Then I had Mr. Bradury prepare that consent to annexation that we would record on every lot that would become an exception on the title report that would pass on and on to all property owners, fully notifying them that there is a consent to annexation. So, that was just an attempt to try to ease some of Council's questions on having somebody fight annexation in the future. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Jewett, this would be fine if it -- are you going to build all those houses and sell them to the homeowners or is it -- or are contractors going to come in and build and sell? Jewett: The contractors that build those would work with me, as far as building those and selling them. My company would sell them. Bird: Okay. And how are you going to guarantee that they use this agreement when they -- when the contractor sells the house to the purchaser? I mean you and him can have this agreement, but what happens if he sells it to another and they donlt see this? Jewett: Okay. The three real estate documents, if any house out there sold by a licensed realtor, they must use that form. Bird: But what if they are sold by a non-licensed realtor? ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 5 of 58 Jewett: In the event that somebody would sell it without using a licensed realtor, the only document then that would tie in would be the consent that we would record against the property, the consent to annexation. So, I try to protect it in multiple ways. But, you're correct, if you sell it to a private party, they would not be required use that document. They are required to use a property disclosure and that's the property disclosure that the state of Idaho has sanctioned. Bird: All right. Nichols: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nichols. Nichols: Just to verify what Mr. Jewett is saying, the RE 25 Seller's Property Disclosure form is required in the sale of any residential property in the state of Idaho, whether it's sale by owner or the builder contractor sells the property or Mr. Jewett, as a realtor, assists someone in selling the property. They all have to do that. And this comes out of the legislation that was passed in the 2002 session. The RE 22 form -- this is a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement that the real estate agents have come up with for their standard form, which includes that disclosure. Again, it's just another way of making the disclosure that's required under state law and the consent to annexation form is very similar to the one we typically require when someone obtains services outside the city limits. We use the term irrevocable in the consent, but, other than that it's more or less the same. It's intended to run with the land and bind the property, no matter who owns it. So, although I would expect, probably, a couple things would happen, one would be Mr. Jewett, as the developer of the property or owner of the property now, there would be a consent to annexation that would apply to all five lots from him, but he's just doubling up, then, with this one to whomever he sells the lot to, whether it be to the builder or to the ultimate homeowner that's going to contract with the builder to put up the home. Again, it's not fool proof. You still have people that sign these things or their predecessor's in interest sign them and said, well, I never saw the title report, because my blankety blank realtor never show it to me. But, it is a way that - - particularly in connection with the services that are provided, conditioned upon these types of consents, I think it would be very difficult for someone to get around. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Nichols, what you're telling me, these three items, particularly the two items that will be enforced, that we are protecting future councils? Nichols: Madam President, Members of the Council, I believe so. And the reason I believe so is that even if there were some change in the annexation law, I still think that you can't void a contract and there are Constitutional protections for contracts and this would be one. Mr. Jewett doesn't get the water and sewer unless there is a consent to ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 6 of 58 annexation and there is no consent to annexation without sewer and water. So there is give and take back and forth and I think it would be sustainable. Bird: Thank you. That's alii have. De Weerd: Mr. Jewett, do you have -- I know you have that future commercial lot once -- if you are given sewer to these lots, will we see you back next month for that other lot? Jewett: That lot had an existing septic on it, so it has an exemption. It's not under the same restrictions the five are. So, if we did sell it to some use, they would have -- call it a grandfathered right to either utilize that septic or upgrade it. If that wasn't plausible and I sold it to somebody and they wanted to come forward, you know, I have no proposed use for it. It's going to be something in the future in commercial. I think if the North Meridian Plan comes back forward that might change the use up there at that point and something might get -- that's in the future. De Weerd: Is that for a commercial use, then, the exemption for the septic for commercial use? Jewett: The septic doesn't differentiate between residential and commercial, it just says that there is an existing septic that was on there and so we don't have to go through the same guidelines that a re on a new. So, if they -- for example, if they came in and wanted to put a church in there, they would have to show that they could upsize that existing drain field to handle what they want to do. So, they -- but they have -- because it's existing, it's not under a sanitary restriction like the other four or five lots are. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: He did open up another question for me. In other words, what we are going to do is probably get a little enclave out there because as long as their septic tank's working, they are not going to come on, I donlt care, and as a city we have no way of forcing it. So, I believe right now -- this is my personal feeling and I can be probably changed, but I think that seeing how the same owner owns that, I would like to see that future lot also part of the five lots for annexation once it gets contiguous. Jewett: It was always our intention to sign the same document for it for annexation as the other ones. Bird: You're willing to do it right now? Jewett: Yes. Absolutely. Bird: Okay. Because you just told her that that was -- you weren't going to do that, that you were going to -- that you had a -- Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 7 of 58 Jewett: Let me clarify that. Are you saying that you want to provide sewer service to it, then? Bird: Well, yeah. Jewett: Oh. Okay. Bird: We will do that. Jewett: That's fine, then. Yeah. That just kind of cleans it up forever, then. Bird: Well, it does -- certainly cleans it up for us. Jewett: And that's fine. I have -- Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, if I might direct some questions to the application through you. Is this not an RUT cluster sub and how are they going to get approved for a commercial use on a dedicated open space lot? Jewett: I t's a combination R UT slash cluster. S 0, t hat's a five a ere building I at. The open space was part of the school and church property. Powell: So once you provide urban services to that lot it would be eligible for a rezone to a commercial designation, whereas, if you don't provide the municipal services to it at this time, it would not be eligible for a rezone to a commercial designation? Jewett: I believe t he owners would have to have a rezone and urban services to be subject to a -- well, no, it's just a five acre building lot right now that has no restrictions on it. It has none. Powell: But the allowed uses do not include a great deal of commercial use at this time? Jewett: That's correct. Veterinarian clinics, churches, day cares, schools, those are all allowed uses, but that's pretty much the extent of the allowed uses. Powell: So, Madam President, Members of the Council, by providing sewer service to that lot, you open up the opportunity for them to gain a rezone through the county for a much wider variety of commercial uses. Right now they would only be allowed those that are allowed on -- within the urban transitional zone. So, it's kind of a -- there are just some -- there is some benefits and some drawbacks to that, providing services at this time. De Weerd: Anna, what is the agreement with the school district on that school? When they come in for that school, they most likely would have an annexation route or not? Do you know when they were thinking about a school -- using that as a school site? Powell: I'm not sure on the timing. I think it's fairly quick. They were able to get -- just to tie in the two last conversations, they were able to have the school approved as an Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 8 of 58 open space use and that's why it's on the remainder lot of that cluster subdivision. If they wanted to annex -- hopefully, with -- by the time that the school property annexes we w ill have our change to the area of city impact agreement so that they would be required to ask you for annexation before they had an application within the county. De Weerd: And that would give the annexation route to that future lot. Powell: Well, this subdivision in general, does because all of them would be annexed as soon as there is a path they would be annexed. I believe that's what we are discussing tonight, is that as soon as there was an annexation path, the City would pursue annexation of all those lots. De Weerd: Any other questions, Council? Okay. Any other -- Jewett: Just to touch on Anna's question. Until there is -- right now that's currently just a residential zone, so until that gets some different designation it couldn't go beyond the uses that I just mentioned earlier. Day care. Church. Veterinary clinic. So, until there is some master plan -- and I will throw one other tid bit. That ten acre parcel that's just to the east of the proposed Saguaro Canyon, he came to me the other day and indicated that that -- either that -- that same developer or another developer had optioned and was going to go move forward so that would make this contiguous if they in fact, moved forward on that. So, this might happen a lot quicker as far as annexation than we all think. It might take still some years to get the sewer all over there because there is a lot of subdivisions to develop. But I think the annexation is right around the corner and on the five acre lots, you know, I'll sign a consent to annexation, basically, on the terms that the City Council desires, until you re-camp plan that, it's not going to change. And there are those limited uses. That can go a church, et cetera, but there is not going to be anything major, this is right now adjacent to one of your neighborhood centers, I believe, but I don't know how that might change with the North Meridian Plan. So, our opinion on that has always been that the potential is down the road and so that's why we just kind of left it and waited for the new camp plan and just waited until sewer and all the services get there. De Weerd: Thank you. Jewett: Thank you. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: lid like to ask the other Council people what do you think of either taking that commercial lot in or not? Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. / ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 9 of 58 Nary: It sure sounds like a Catch 22, but I guess if I have to weigh the balance between whether to create this enclave lot that we will be probably struggling with more than what the potential uses could be between now and then -- and I guess I could be hopeful, as Mr. Jewett just stated, that that ten acre piece in between comes in, gets annexed, these people get annexed, that commercial lot gets annexed, it's covered under our Comprehensive Plan, it probably sooner than someone else is going to want to develop something out there on that fringe that's more troubling to us, but I guess I didn't hear from Mr. Watson on that five acre piece. We need to discuss that on that potential and whether or not that's an issue to Public Works on that future commercial lot and adding that to this request. Watson: Madam President, Councilmember Nary, today it would be a concern. Nary: It would be? Watson: Yeah. If he were proposing to build something commercial today, that would be a concern up there, because of fire flow capacities, potentially. It's a little difficult to explain, but there is a pressure zone boundary that splits that parcel. If it was a large commercial we would have problems. But as this other subdivision comes eastward and ultimately connects, we won't have as much of a problem. Potentially, we will -- in the memo that I wrote last week, one of the conditions that we offered was that they would be required to sign the city standard agreement for a connection to city services, the annexation agreement. We could make an additional bullet point in there that that would remain residential until such time as we annexed and could provide adequate city services, just as a suggestion. De Weerd: So, Brad, what are the pros and the cons in considering this? Watson: Madam President, they remain the two that I mentioned last week. One is that he has offered to pay half the cost of the eight inch sewer that will run from the southern boundary up Jericho Road that will take in all five of those commercial lots -- five residential lots, plus it would basically pick up that commercial lot, too. It would come right to that southeast -- southwest corner. That's the one benefit. The second benefit was the one that was a little bit more gray, I guess, as far as the city is concerned, but it's my -- my reluctance to allow more septic systems in an urbanized area. De W eerd: And the cons? Watson: Well, the cons are, as Mr. Nichols has pointed out, there is always -- nothing is full proof. The only potential con I can see right away is that if somehow that commercial lot did get redesignated and wanted to develop immediately, we may not be able to provide adequate fire flows for what they want to do, but I would trust we would have plenty of opportunity to comment to Ada County if it wasn't annexed at that time. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 10 of 58 Bird: Brad, you're saying water flow. Are we -- are we- talking water and sewer or just sewer? I thought we were just talking sewer -- sewering out there at this point. Watson: Correct. Several weeks or months ago we already agreed to provide water service to these five residential lots and tonight we are only talking about sewer service to these five residential lots. But on a whole, looking at that commercial lot, the water concerns me today. Bird: Where is the line and stuff coming from that? Is it at the end of the line or is it a new well that we are putting in or is it hooking to the existing well for the Vienna Woods and those places like that? Watson: I'll answer it kind of in reverse -- or maybe out of order. The church and the school squeak by in terms fire flow and what we can provide. There is a pressure zone boundary just west of Locust Grove Road. We need to get an interconnection across that section through the proposed Saguaro Canyon and what other development takes place to Meridian Road, so that we can get a loop through that system. Second, we do need another well somewhere in that general one mile radius vicinity and we are working on locating the site and you might remember some discussion with Mr. Jewett that he had set aside some land if we wanted to purchase it for a well site. So, we are still looking at all those options. De Weerd: Is there any concern, Brad -- 11m sorry, Keith. Bird: Go ahead. De Weerd: Is there any concern about any precedent we are going to set by doing this? Watson: Madam President, I think, obviously, there would be some concern, but every one of these we evaluate individually and look at the merits of what they are offering. This one is at the very outer reaches of the impact area. It looks like it could be engineered fairly easily to tie into the future system that looks like it's coming, but, sure, there are other proposals that could be around the fringes of the developed area that will not work for either sewer or water for one reason or another. Each one of these proposals takes quite a bit of time for Public Works staff to evaluate and I can't say that they are all bad and all good and -- there is a lot of evaluating and subjective evaluation that goes on. De Weerd: But I guess when we make a decision to either do this or not, it should be based on some -- something a little bit concrete, so the next request -- I guess we have a desire to do -- to not do this and yet we have two subdivisions that we have done it for and we have been very resistant to do it to more. I guess I would like to look at maybe what kind 0 f criteria t hat allows consideration a nd, then, yau d 0 it 0 n your individual basis, even to save the staff time up front, all the analysis that you need to do, that it has to fit certain criteria. Otherwise, you will have your hands full of this that you donlt get any compensation for staff time to evaluate these projects and so this is eating away at the other fees that are being paid, they are sustaining the cost of this. But I guess we have to start looking at it because this is not the first one. The other ones have been / \ Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 11 of 58 denied. But I can see that itls going to continue to come and it would be helpful to start setting out some kind of criteria, if there is one. You know, maybe that's not' even feasible either because you can't guess about everything just to make your life easier. Watson: Madam President, we could certainly make an interim a ttempt a t looking at some kind of criteria for these projects. We will also need to rely on some of Council's direction, though, that -- in terms of the geographic area of our area of impact and I guess we operate under the presumption, wrongly or rightly, that there are certain areas of our area of impact that we should make attempts to service because of other utilities or other entities. De Weerd: Well-- and I do understand that, Brad. I guess we need to look at that further and maybe now is not the time to do that, but we do need to look at this, because it just seems like we are setting ourselves up for these annexation -- forced annexation type of situations and I donlt think anyone has a whole lot of comfort in that kind of approach. Watson: True. We don't either. And just, real briefly, this project has snowballed from where it was a year ago or maybe even a year and a half ago. This started as an initial request only for water for the Valley Life Community Church, went to the school district for water and sewer, went back to the church for sewer, I think. I mean this has been a -- this has just kind of crept along pushing farther and farther. De Weerd: I know. I feel your pain. Is there any other comments or questions? Okay. Well, do I have a motion? Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: This isn't a motion yet, but it's -- I believe that what you said is true, we are getting -- we are getting ourselves backed into some corners that we are probably not going to be happy with, at the same time, but we have done it before, we have taken and already allowed two parcels out of this 20 acre parcel, I believe it is, to do the water and sewer. I don't know how we deny the others here if we can -- if we can get them to do that. My biggest concern is that commercial lot, of whether we force that into now or whether we leave it alone, I don't -- I donlt know. I would hope we'd have water flow out there before it was developed, but there is never no guarantee. So, that's my thoughts on the deal. I would have no problem passing the sewer on it, as long as all these terms are met, because we have done it on two-thirds of the property already. Or three-quarters - - 75 percent of them. So, I'd like to hear some other discussion from the Council, if there is any. If not, I will make a motion. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. ( ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 12 of 58 Nary: I guess the one thing I did hear from Brad that Mr. Jewett hasn't commented on, he did say he would agree to whatever we needed to do for that commercial lot and what Brad was asking was a restriction on building, basically not having any other uses on that lot at this time, other than what already would have been allowed without the sewer and I haven't heard from Mr. Jewett as to whether or not that was agreeable to him. He's nodding yes. So, that would be fine. I guess that being said then, I would concur with Mr. Bird. I -- you know, we are pushing ourselves, you know -- Bird: Into a corner. Nary: And that's just going to happen, it's going to happen all along that north Meridian corridor. I think we have had this discussion a number of times up here on -- at some point in the future on whether or not the potential of having an involuntary annexation -- that may happen, but here, in balancing the interests of the needs of the City, we have already allowed Valley Life and the Meridian School District pieces to have water and sewer, so I can't really think of any logical reason not to allow that same to occur on these other portions of this lot -- of this piece and with the consent to annex, with the agreement to not develop that commercial lot until -- to any degree more than allowed currently until we have the appropriate water flow with Mr. Jewett willing to agree to all of those conditions to have that. I really can't see a reason to deny it. I think we are going to get there. I think the Saguaro Canyon is probably going to speed this up and will probably be contiguous and I guess crossing our fingers that will be contiguous sooner than later, so it seems to make sense. Bird: Was that your motion? Nary: I guess my motion would be that we would -- De Weerd: That's a long motion. Nary: My motion would be that we allow the developer, Mr. Jewett, and the City to enter into an agreement to provide sewer service and I guess water and sewer service to the other parcel 0 f this I at a nd that lhe agreement be worked 0 ut with t he Public Works Department with the limitations as expressed here on the record by Mr. Jewett, for both the residential lots, as well as the future commercial lot, including the documents provided to us regarding the consent to annex, as well as the other real estate documents be included as part of the record here. Bird: For the attorney to draw up the Findings -- Nary: And for Mr. Nichols to figure all that out and draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order. Bird: 1111 second that. De Weerd: Well, I'm not going to repeat that motion. Nichols: Madam President? ( (- Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 13 of 58 De Weerd: I should make a ruling to not ramble. Mr. Nichols. Nichols: Mr. Madam President, Members of the Council, I think in the past we haven't drawn up findings for these, but we have worked on a consent to annexation and the agreement to provide water and sewer service outside the city limits and I think that's what have done in the past and so we will work with staff to make sure that the extra language works it way into the standard agreement. Nary: And I would amend my motion to be consistent with our past practices. Bird: Second will agree. De Weerd: Brad, is t here a ny comments that you have? Anything that needs to be included in that extra long motion? Watson: Madam President, Council Members, the only thing that I would ask be included is -- are the conditions listed in my memo from last week. I -- it evidently didn't make it into my file, but it's the one that was presented at Council on December 12th. Bird: That was included. Nary: And I did -- I guess I thought I was including that. Bird: You did. Watson: Okay. De Weerd: Did you have suggested language to that one -- one of those conditions? Watson: Hopefully, we will have the minutes available and I can -- Bill -- or Mr. Nichols and I and Mr. Jewett can, I think, craft those during the review of that agreement. Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Well in essence, the motion alluded to approving sewer service to Westborough Subdivision, including the northwest future commercial lot and ask the attorney to draw up the appropriate papers for Council approval. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll? Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. De Weerd: Okay. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 7. FP 03-059 Request for Final Plat approval of 100 single-family residential building lots and 5 common lots on 36.66 acres in a R-4 zone for Messina ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 14 of 58 Hills Subdivision No.2 by Tuscany Development, Inc. - between South Locust Grove Road and South Eagle Road, south of East Vic.tory Road: De Weerd: Item No.7, FP 03-059, request for final plat approval of 100 single family residential building lots and five common lots on 36.66 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision NO.2 and we will open with staff comments. Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, pardon that -- this is a request for final plat approval. I have shown the preliminary plat for Tuscany Lakes on the overhead here. The area that is being final -- has final plat is roughly within the elliptical area and is shown on this view. There was one minor change to the preliminary plat that I wanted to point out. Originally, this was a building lot. You will notice it's directly at the end of this stub street. They have requested that this be, basically, an amenity -- an additional amenity. They have asked for a club house and pool house to be located there and they asked for approval to make that change and to also kind of relocate that buildable single family residential lot into a future phase and I have given them permission to dot hat. We d 0 feel its ubstantially - - 0 r I have indicated t hat I would support their request to you to be allowed to do that. I should phrase that more correctly. So, we do feel it substantially complies with the approved preliminary plat. De Weerd: Thank you. Is the applicant here tonight? Powell: He is not here. He has submitted a letter saying that he is in support of the conditions of approval and we have worked with him and he did contact us directly. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Anna, there is also another change from the preliminary plat and that was the location of East Palarmo Drive-- Powell: You are correct. Bird: -- was shifted to the north by one lot depth and that didn't change anything and the staff is okay with that, too? Powell: I had no concerns with that. Bird: Okay. I didn't think you did, but I just wanted to make sure. De Weerd: Okay. Any other discussion, Council? Okay. Do I have a motion? Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 15 of 58 Bird: I would move that we approve the FP 03-059, request for final plat approval of 100 single family residential building lots and five common lots on 36.66 acres in an R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No. 2 by Tuscany Development, Incorporated, between South Locust Grove Road and South Eagle Road, south of East Victory Road and for the attorney to draw up the proper papers and to include staff comments, which included the changing of East Palarmo Drive and also the changing of Lot 2, Block 17, to a club house and pool. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve FP 03-059 with the noted changes. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll. Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 8. FP 03-060 Request for Final Plat approval of 6 common lots on 1.67 acres in an R-4 zone for Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No.2 by Tuscany Development, Inc. - east of South Locust Grove Road and south of East Victory Road: De Weerd: Okay. Item 8, FP 03-060, request for final plat approval of six common lots on 1.67 acres in an R-4 zone for Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No.2. Anna. Powell: Madam Chair, Members of the Council, this is the Tuscany -- the preliminary plat approval for Tuscany Lakes and again the area that has the final plat is roughly encircled by the ellipse. It is an unusual preliminary plat in that there is not a single building lot on it. They are all common lots in a road dedication. This was necessary, because one of the conditions of approval during the preliminary plat process was to provide a secondary access between Messina Hills and Tuscany Lakes and this provides that extension of Palarmo Drive, which will provide that secondary access. I can go back up and you can see how it connects to Tuscany to the east. It is in substantial compliance with t he approved preliminary plat a nd staff is recommending approval. De Weerd: And the applicant is not here on this one? Powell: Correct. 11m sorry. He sent a letter on this one also. De Weerd: Boy, he's got this figured out. Any comments? Questions? Motions? Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird, I think the burden is on your shoulders tonight. Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 16 of 58 Bird: I move that we approve FP 03-060, the request for final plat approval of six common lots 0 n 1 .67 acres in an R -4 z one for Tuscany Lakes Subdivision N o. 2 by Tuscany 0 evelopment, Incorporated, east 0 f South Locust G rove Road and south of East Victory Road, the attorney to draw up the proper papers and include the staff comments. McCandless: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve FP 03-060 with all appropriate paperwork. Mr. Berg, you want to call roll? Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9. FP 03-061 Request for Final Plat approval of 63 single-family residential building lots and 10 common lots on 25.78 acres in an R-8 zone for Kelly Creek Subdivision No.1 by Kevin Howell Construction - northwest corner of North Linder Road and West McMillan Road: De Weerd: Okay. Item 9, FP 03-061, request for final plat approval of 63 single family residential building lots and 10 common lots on 25.78 acres in an R-8 zone for Kelly Creek Subdivision No.1. Anna? Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, I think you will recall Kelly Creek Subdivision came not too long ago and they are in for their first final plat. The area included in the final plat is roughly shown within the elliptical area. It does include the large open -- central open space as approved on the preliminary plat. This is the final plat and to my knowledge -- well, it substantially complies with the approved preliminary plat and to my knowledge the applicant's representative has no concerns with the conditions of approval, so there are no outstanding issues before Council. De Weerd: Okay. Is the applicant here tonight? Please state your name and address. Fluke: Darin Fluke, 250 Beechwood Drive, Boise. De Weerd: Thank you. Do you have any comments? Fluke: I do not. We are fine with the conditions as written. De Weerd: Thank you. Any questions for the applicant? Bird: I have none. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Oh. Mr. Nary. Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 17 of 58 Nary: Well, since you're going to throw the gauntlet down, I guess we have got to -- I move the approval of FP 03-061, the request for final plat approval of 63 single family residential building lots and 10 common lots on 25.78 acres in an R-8 zone for Kelly Creek Subdivision NO.1 by Kevin Howell Construction at the northwest corner of North Linder Road and West McMillan Road, for Council to prepare the appropriate documents and including all staff comments, staff report, and the comments of the applicant. Bird: Second. De Weerd: Thank you. It's been moved and seconded to approve FP 03-061 , to include all staff comments a nd ask the a ttorney to draw up the appropriate paperwork. Mr. Berg, please, call roll. Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 10. TE 03-007 Request for a Time Extension for Recording the Final Plat for Drawbrid~e Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - west of North Ten Mile Road and south of West McMillan Road: De Weerd: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Nary. Okay. Item No. 10, TE 03-007, request for a time extension for recording the final plat for Drawbridge Subdivision and we will open with staff comments. Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, just as a refresher, the Drawbridge Subdivision area is shown here. It's just north of Bridgetower and south of -- I'm sorry. Just west of Bridgetower Subdivision, a small one. You will see the wastewater treatment plant down to the south there. This is the final plat and the final plat was approved by City Council on the 17th of December, 2002, so they have submitted their request for a time extension, according to Meridian code and staff has -- is recommending approval of that time extension. Actually, we are quite happy to see a time extension, rather than a variance. Nary: Me, too. De Weerd: Why is that? Is the applicant here? McKinnon: Dave McKinnon, 735 South Crosstimber, Meridian, Idaho. Unless you have any questions, it's just a straight forward time extension request. The actual subdivision is under construction right now and we are just not going to get it recorded in time with the 0 ne year time frame, so - - if yau have a ny questions, I w ill be happy to answer those. De Weerd; Well, Dave, you know when you step up to the mike we have to give you a hard time. So, Council, don't disappoint him. (- ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 18 of 58 Bird: Well, I just wondered if he had lost his razor blade or what. McKinnon: This is full two weeks growth for me, so I'm really working on it. Bird: It would be about ten years for me. De Weerd: It doesn't seem like there is any comments. Thank you. McKinnon: Thanks. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would movethatweapprovetheTE03-007, request fora time extension for recording the final plat for Drawbridge Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Incorporated, west of Ten Mile Road and south of West McMillan Road, to 12/01/04 and for the attorney to draw up the proper papers. McCandless: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to extend the recording of the final plat for Drawbridge Subdivision to December 1, 2004. Mr. Clerk. Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 11. Continued Public Hearing from November 12, 2003: CUP 03-047 Request for a Conditional Use Permit to demolish existing home and rebuild one single family residential dwelling for caretakers quarters on lot 2, block 2 of Observation Point Subdivision in a R-4 zone by RF Construction - 500 East Victory Road: De Weerd: Okay. Item NO.11 is a continued Public Hearing from November 12, 2003, on CUP 03-047, request for a Conditional Use Permit to demolish an existing home and rebuild one single family residential dwelling for a caretaker's quarters on a Lot 2, Block 2, of Observation Point Subdivision. We will open -- we will continue this Public Hearing with staff comments. Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, you had asked us to come back with some specific information and I will get to that in just a moment, but I did read over the minutes and I did want to make it clear, because it doesn't -- it is not reflected in the presentation that was given to you last week. This is a request for an extension or expansion of a nonconforming use. Our zoning ordinance does allow folks to request this of you through the conditional use process. It would be similar to -- if a property happens to have two houses on it right now and one of them burned down, they would have to come to you with a similar request for the extension or expansion of a ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 19 of 58 nonconforming use. I guess I just wanted to let you know that and make sure that the record reflected that. So, this is a way for the Council to approve things that are currently not conforming uses within the boundaries of the zoning ordinance. Having said that, you had asked for specific information on whether or not this was included as part of the original application. Craig Hood provided a memo to you. He had one day to get that to you and that hits part of that information. What his research showed that was the original application for the preliminary plat did include this property within the boundary. Originally, it was three lots and, then, they found out from ACHD that they would have to put a bridge, so they pulled it back. I went back and after reading your minutes from last week, I realized that there was additional concerns that Councilmember Bird had expressed, so I had Greg do some more research and I can give you the results of that right now. On -- just to let you know, the record for the final plat staff report did recognize -- it did specifically address those plat notes, so the applicant was well aware of what those plat notes and said they had considered them and looked at them. So, it wasn't something that was overlooked during the process. They had, actually, suggested some wording regarding it, which is similar to the wording we have now. We were also able to find correspondence from Briggs Engineering, who was representing the applicant, to the Ada County Highway District regarding the property. Originally, when they came and they said you would have to put a bridge, they said, well, we want to use it as an office lot and, therefore, we don't want to have the office traffic going into the subdivision, so we don't want that connection provided at this time. So, their intent as stated, then, was to have it as an office lot in the future and that was consistent with t he plat note that says when they redevelop, then, they w ill provide sewer and water. But the intention as it went through the preliminary plat, the last indications from the applicant were that it would be an office lot, but that they fully understood as the preliminary plat went through that it would be a non buildable lot until sewer and water were available. When the final plat came through -- and I think this is where everybody's memory keeps on clueing and remembering this part. Came back on the final plat as a buildable lot. Staff pointed out that it did not -- could not be a buildable lot, because there were not sewer and water services available. At that point the applicant requested that it be taken off the plat, that it not be included in the final plat. There was quite a bit of discussion about an illegal lot. Mr. Nichols testified quite a bit -- or provided input regarding that if it were an illegal lot, illegal subdivision, somebody might sell it and, then, they'd come in for a building permit and they wouldn't be able to get a building permit and kind of all the hassles that go with just leaving it not on a subdivision. So, at that time it was placed back on the -- or required to be placed back on the plat as a nonbuildable lot. And that is reflected in the minutes from those -- from that final plat hearing is when it came off. But for the initial -- we went through our files, 0 ur initial preliminary plat files. It was always included. T here is a possibility, since not all the staff that are -- that were there at that time are still on the staff, there was a possibility that somebody required it to be included when they first came in, maybe somebody said, well, you have to include that property. We donlt know. It's certainly not reflected in the records. Public Works went through all their files and it's always been shown on their files as well. So, I do believe that the confusion came at the final plat stage when they asked for it to be a buildable lot and then they asked for it to be taken off, because they didn't want to have it be a nonbuildable lot. So, I believe that answers your questions and I do -- staff -- just to remind you, staffs original recommendation was for denial, based on the plat notes, and there aren't a lot of '" Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 20 of 58 findings that the zoning ordinance sets forward for this, so just based on the plat notes staff had originally recommended denial. De Weerd: I guess, Anna, another part of the request was to indicate what the conversation was when the applicant came several months ago. The direction that was indicated by Council at that time, other than it just wasn't -- only to bring it to an application to be considered or was there any indication of -- Powell: I looked through those minutes. It's been a little while, because I looked through them quite a bit before I had the applicant come forward with the extension or expansion of the nonconforming use. I had gone through them -- it would have been a couple months now. So, I will speak from those memories. I didn't review them prior to this hearing. But I don't think there was any expectations expressed by the Council that this permission would be granted, if that's what you're wondering. It was -- you recognized that there were plat notes on there that didn't allow it and you said if we are going to consider this, we need to consider it at a Public Hearing. It took me -- quite honestly, it took me a long time to figure out what of kind Public Hearing I was going to bring before you and that's why I wanted to point out the expansion of a nonconforming use, because it is stated in the zoning ordinance and this is a valid way to consider this, but that's where we ended up. So, I don't think there was any implied consent given at anytime in the past, it was just that it needed to be before you in a Public Hearing and you would consider it, then. De Weerd: And during the final plat when that piece was taken off -- or when there was conversation about that particular piece, was there any further direction on it, other than it was nonbuildable until the sewer was available? Powell: I can read some of the testimony from Mr. Cavin and Mr. Nichols, if you'd like me to. De Weerd: If it would be helpful. Powell: I think so. Mr. Cavin -- he first says -- says we can go through the process of putting in a plat and doing two nonbuild agreements and he just said, you know, we'd like to keep it a separate piece from the plat at this point, we know the risk to us as an illegal lot split, which simply means that we cannot get a building -- a permit to build on there. Weare willing to take that responsibility for that. So, they talked about not building on it regardless, knowing that it would be an illegal lot, basically. Later on in the in the hearing Mr. Nichols pointed out that it was identified as an unbuildable lot, because of the lack of Black Cat Trunk, that there was a provision that was one of the main provisions why the septic and well was allowed to stay on the particular lot. So, the only reason that the septic was allowed to stay was because a lot of those conversations centered around that lot and the nonavailability of sewer. At some point -- and, then, he expressed the concern at some point down the road somebody sells the lot and somebody comes in to get a building permit and they cannot get one or maybe one is issued by mistake and, then, they find out there is no sewer. And then you said I suppose we could amend the development agreement, yet, again, it specified that this particular area is unbuildable and nothing can be done on it without separate application ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 21 of 58 to the city and the existence of sewer and maybe do it that way. And then Ms. Stiles talks about how it was shown as nonbuildable on the preliminary plat and then buildable on the fine plat. And the motion by Councilmember Bird was that we tabled it again. I did not go to the next hearing, but it was just to table it to give them time to workout the staff comments. I don't think there was a considerable amount of testimony, otherwise, Craig would have highlighted that for me or given me those minutes. So, I think it was just to workout the wording for the plat note. I think it was pretty clear as it went through that that would not be developed further until such time as there were sewer and water available from both the staff and from the Council and from the owner. De Weerd: Okay. Any questions, Council? Is the applicant -- is the testimony you provide tonight the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Sheffield: Yes. De Weerd: Please state your name and address. Sheffield: Elliott Sheffield, 1872 North Haven Cove Way, Meridian, Idaho. I guess from what I hear Anna saying is that we have -- it was not a buildable lot until we had sewer and water available. I think we have addressed that problem and now that we can tie into the existing sewer with Observation Point, we do have water and sewer available. And I would like to bring up one other point. Councilman Nary made a statement that the people in Observation Point expected that to be a 2,100 square foot home and I just -- I'd like to just read one sentence if I could out of the restrictive covenants. If we had it to write again it would be a paragraph, it is just one sentence. It says no residential lot shall be divided into two or more building sites, except lots 1 and 2, Block 2, which said lots are south and west of the Ridenbaugh Canal, which the grantor or assigns retain said rights to rezone and/or replat. I guess me, as a home buyer, if I were going to buy a lot in that area, I would read that as that could be a 7 -Eleven convenience store or an apartment complex where it fronts Victory Road. I would not, in my mind, see it as a building lot for a single family residential home and so I think as a home buyer buying that, reading the covenants, they would -- my opinion is they would read it the same way. De Weerd: Any questions? Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: But, Mr. Sheffield, I mean based on that statement out of your CC&Rs, you're wanting to built it into a single family home, so, you're right, if they read it and thought, well, that could be a 7 -Eleven or a park or a fire station or something, but if it's going to be a house, it's going to be a house like theirs. So, I guess you're not asking to replat it or rezone it, you're asking just to tear down the existing house and build another one. So, to me, if it was going to be a house, even based on your -- the logic that you have stated, if it was going to be a house, it would be a house that looked like theirs. What do you think? ( Meridian City Council November 18,2003 Page 22 of 58 Sheffield: Councilman Nary, I -- when I ride by the subdivision and I have really done a lot of looking at this piece of property lately. When you go either down Victory Road or in Observation Point, this piece of ground in no way looks like it's attached to Observation Point, just by the lay of the land and the canal breaking it up and the lay of the trees, does not deem itself to be a part of Observation Point. It looks very much not a part and I guess that's why we are asking for an exception to the plat for lower square footage than what the plat requires. De Weerd: Okay. Anna, with the applicant standing here, with the condition the way it was or the discussion the way it was, now that there is sewer available to this, is this the appropriate next step? Powell: Well, Madam President, Members of the Council, the only kind of flaw in logic that I s ee is that if it were to be residential, Ada County Highway 0 istrict was pretty explicit about wanting a connection through the rest of Observation Point. Their argument for not providing that bridge was that it was going to be office, so that it wouldn't be appropriate to mingle them. The tricky part about these requests -- and I have a feeling you will be seeing some in the future, so I'll keep on coming back to this, but these requests for the extension or expansion of a nonconforming use is -- you know, at some point the city had decided it was appropriate to have larger houses here. At least it's been bumped up to the city's minimum at this point, but the city decided it was appropriate to have a larger house here. If he puts a smaller house, it's not likely to ever go away. I mean if you're going to put a new house on there, I think we are establishing this as a residential property and it's not likely to go away anytime soon. So, is t hat the way the Council wants to go? I s that the way the city wants to go? Because I don't think this becomes and interim use any longer, especially if it goes on sewer and if there is a residential connection, rather than a commercial connection, it's likely to be residential now. So, that's -- De Weerd: I guess you have to look at the practical aspects of it, too. You have a pretty irregular size piece of property with -- if they are going to develop it -- the rest of it with homes, they are going to have to' put in that bridge and it's going to be very. Costly. So, I -- I don't know what the next step is. But I think what Mr. Sheffield has said, it does look like it's not a part of Observation Point -- of that subdivision. So, I guess the rest of the question would be what would be the rest of the plan for that piece of property and what is practical to think of. You're not going to -- well, I -- and I don't know. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: I mean I think -- I think thaes exactly the point. If it's not a part, then, make it not a part. Putting a brand new house on that piece, just like Mrs. Powell just said, really makes it look like a residential subdivision. Ifs not going to move. It's not going to change. And now what's going to happen is the rest of that piece, you or someone else is going to come here and say, well, we should put all these littler houses on here, ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 23 of 58 because this one's littler, so we should make them all the same. And we don't really need a connection, because it's not a part. Well, that was what it seems that the Council back in '99 or 2000 was anticipating that, thinking that some replatting, some rethinking of what was going to be there, but having on nonconforming use and extending that by basically allowing a brand new structure built there, really extends that nonconforming use another 25 years or 30 years or forever, as long as we just keep fixing the house up and we never have to deal with it. My view, which hasn't changed from this information from what I said last week was go figure out what you want to do with the whole piece, whether it belongs as a park, whether it belongs as an 0 ffice, whether it belongs as residential, whether it belongs as something else and, then, do that, but to do this in this piecemeal fashion totally does defeat the whole purpose. Whether you like it or not or how it looks or not, it's part of that plat. I mean it doesn't look like it belongs there, I agree with that. In practicality it doesn't look like it but then that was what the intent of the Council was three years ago. Go figure it out, now there is sewer there that's available for you, figure out what you want to do, but to do it in this piecemeal fashion just boxes us in. If we allow this house, we are probably going to have houses there and that's it. So, I guess I'm just not in favor of this. I think it was intended for you to replat it or rezone it, that's why your CC&Rs reflect that. But it wasn't meant to just piecemeal this back and forth with just rebuilding another house there. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Basically, when we passed the final plat, this property was put off until it could be sewered and watered and at that time we thought the sewer could come in from the Black Car. Evidently, you guys have figured out a way to sewer into the existing Observation Point Subdivision for at least this one lot. I believe this is two lots down there. The impression that we got -- and 11m speaking for myself only -- was that this lot would probably be used as a commercial lot. I don't know what the caretaker's house -- who this caretaker is. Is it the one that takes care of the house across the road? Sheffield: It is. Bird: Okay. So, I don't know. I have mixed emotions. I hate to tell people down there -- and I agree with Tammy that it is set aside from Observation, but if I had one of those 350,000 dollar houses up on the ridge up there, I donlt think I would want to look down onto a 1 ,400 square foot house. So, I donlt know, it's -- I hate to tell somebody they can't do something with their own land when they have had it there. A 1 ,400 square house -- new house is certainly an improvement over what we got there. If we can get the weeds and stuff mowed and kept down, it would be a nice addition, too, so -- I don't know. It's -- it's a tough decision to -- and I don't know what percentage -- what percent of Observation Point is sold and built. Sheffield: I believe we have probably 20 percent. Bird: You're not 50, are you? ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 24 of 58 Sheffield: No. Bird: Thirty? Twenty-five? Maybe a quarter? Sheffield: I don't think. Probably -- Bird: Is that -- is all the houses built? I mean is there lots sold that aren't built on yet? Sheffield: There are. I don't know the percentage. Bird: I mean I think the owner is -- if people have problems with having a 1 ,400 square foot house down there, he's got a lot more lots to sell and it's going to take money out of his pocket if they donlt buy it, so I -- I don't know. I -- this is -- this is a tough one. Like I said, I hate to tell people they can't build a caretaker house there. We knew that that's what the older home was, so I -- this is some more input and output. Sheffield: Madam President, the owners have said that they would relinquish any further rights to develop the rest of that piece of property, so that would -- as we green up and Mr. Berg gave me a list of what green up had meant, if we were to green up the rest of that lot and build a house on that, I think it would make that a very attractive area and it would also, obviously, increase the tax base. De Weerd: So, are you saying, then, that corner piece will have just this one house on it and nothing else? Sheffield: Yes. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Would we have to change the plat, then? Because that is into two lots, isn't it? De Weerd: No. One's landscaping. Bird: One landscape? Okay. That answered my question. De Weerd: So, how would you maintain the rest of that? Sheffield: Mr. Berg has given me a recommendation. 11m not sure where it came from. I just saw it. But it was to sod the remaining area of the property, would be a minimum standard, and then, if we decided to plant trees, that would be optional and the sodding would be maintained. Powell: Members of the Council, the Planning Commission recommendation was that they green up the remainder of the property, so I had Craig take a stab at what green up ( ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 25 of 58 meant and he's recommending that they either sod or seed and maintain, which means mow or remove weeds the undeveloped portion of the subject lot. De Weerd: Okay. So, this answers Mr. Nary's question about what would you do with the rest of the piece and so what you're saying is it would be just this one house and, then, the rest of it would be greened up, as defined by Mr. Hood. Sheffield: Yes. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Elliott, what is the -- what do the CC&Rs say for a minimum house in Observation? Sheffield: The CC&Rs are 2,100 square feet for a single level. Bird: Twenty one hundred square feet, so we are looking at 700 square feet, which is probably 70,000 dollars more. You're going to build it to about 100 a square foot, aren't you? Sheffield: Yes. Bird: You couldn't get them to go half of that, could you? Go to 1,750? It would look a lot closer. Sheffield: I'm already 15,000 dollars into the sewer we didn't want to be originally. Bird: You didn't want to be already. De Weerd: And greening up, so -- Bird: Greening up is not going to be too -- Nary: Madam President, I guess -- De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: I guess -- what I guess I want to make clear is the intent of our ordinances is to take nonconforming uses and eliminate them and that's not what you're doing. If you were building a 2,100 square foot house and replatting that piece to have one house and lawn for the rest of it, that's different. But you're not asking to do that, you're asking to tear down the existing house and basically build a brand new house of the same type that would be a nonconforming use now. I -- that's the reason I can't support that. Our intent with nonconforming uses is to get rid of them, not to perpetuate them. So, I mean it's admirable for you to want to build a newer house than what's there. I think ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 26 of 58 that's great and that's what we would prefer. It's admirable to want to green up the rest of it so that it doesn't look like a weed patch. That's great. But the next person that comes in and says III1 mow the lawn if you will let me do what I want to do, I have to be able to say no and what I guess for me is if you were building a house in conformance with the rest of this subdivision, that's what we would be -- it wouldn't be an issue. But you donlt want to do that. You want to do something else. And to me all you're doing is perpetuating a nonconforming use and we don't -- I donlt think that's what we are here to do. If you were doing something else -- this is no big surprise, you were told from the outset when you -- when this final plat was approved rezoning this property or replatting this property would be your out in having to develop something else. I just -- I mean I think this is properly before us, I just don't think -- I think if we do the other, all we are doing is perpetuating a use that we donlt want. De Weerd: I guess, Mr. Nary, it doesn't -- that doesn't make sense to me because it is a conforming use. It's an R-4 use. And a 1 ,400 square foot home does comply within an R-4. It doesn't fit with what they have set for the rest of the subdivision, but they have indicated that this isn't part of that subdivision and they even tried to do that in the final plat. So, you know, it does -- it is nonconforming under our definitions, but it does conform with the R-4 subdivision. Nary: But, Madam President, once they decided to leave it as part of the plat, it is a nonconforming use. It is part of the plat. I don't care whether it doesnlt look like it, it is. Thatls life. They were told at the time this final plat was approved that they could replat it or rezone it. They are not asking to do that. They are asking to, essentially, change the existing structure on there, it is nonconforming to what was approved as part of this plat. So, we are perpetuating that nonconforming use by approving what's being requested. That's why the staff recommended denial. I recognize Planning and Zoning tried to, essentially, split the difference here in trying to do what -- what you and Mr. Bird are talking about of greening it up and making it look better and all those things, but the precedent that we set, like we just talked about with Westborough Sub, the precedent that we set here is if this was a -- if this house was in the middle of that subdivision we wouldn't even think twice, we would say no. The fact that it's on the other side of the canal isn't our fault, that's the developer's choice when they chose to bring this forward. We didn't choose that, they did. That's what they were left with. They didnlt have to do it that way, that's what they chose to do. I just don't want to perpetuate that. That's what concerns me. It's not Mr. Sheffield or the fact that it's nicer or it's going to be green. I mean all those things are pluses, but what do we do with the next plat that says we want to change this piece, because it's on the end. De Weerd: So, are you suggesting that they should, instead of doing this, they should have just come back and replatted it? Nary: Yes. De Weerd: And, then, it's almost like almost like the thing -- the application we had last week where it would have taken the same amount of time it's taken to do all of this, to go that other route. ;" -- ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 27 of 58 Nary: No. Totally different, because last week they would have come back to replat the exact same subdivision they already had. Here they don't have anything. They haven't done anything. That's what we said last week. Go figure out what you want to do with this piece and go do that, come back and bring an application that shows where the road's going to be, what's going to be on there, what's the structure -- is it just this one structure forever? Are we going to have just grass on the remainder? It isn't the same thing. Last week's situation with Mr. Van Auker's subdivision really was just bringing back the same thing. This isn't bringing back the same thing. This is not the same in just bringing back one house. That may be what he wants, but that may not be if he were to replat this. It isn't the same. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: You know, we just did have a subdivision east of Observation Point that we required to go -- that wanted an R-8 and made them go R-4, which these guys are R-4, and we also made a minimum house size of 2,000. That kind of sticks with me. Even though this is part of Observation Point, Mr. Nary's right, if they want to come back and I guess replat it and redo that, they could do that, but I -- I mean I, for one, am not going to let them go anything less than a -- what we have approved for R-41s out around there. It's not fair to the Meridian Greens or the existing Observation Point people. Now, I understand it's in there and I hate putting anybody through this kind of stuff and, like I said, I wish they could see their way clear to build a 2,100 square foot place down there and they wouldn't have any problems at all. Because I know as far as I'm concerned, the rest of it can go on the whole two lots. De Weerd: So, what would make it a conforming use? Only making this the square footage of 2,1 OO? Nary: I think so. Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, if you require a sewer connection and a minimum house size of 2,100 square feet, there is no need to approve this. I mean, basically, you're just denying the request for the extension or expansion of the nonconforming use. Nary: Right. De Weerd: Yeah. But, then, would they have to green up the rest of -- I mean would they have to do the rest of the improvements to that lot? So, would you have to do that? Powell: It would be a buildable lot within a subdivision. They would be subject to the general maintenance requirements that every homeowner is subject to, which includes keeping your property free of weeds. Nichols: Madam President? (' Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 28 of 58 De Weerd: Mr. Nichols. Nichols: It's a plat note the minimum square footage IS 2,100 square feet? Okay. Thank you. Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, the one thing you might not get is we did have some -- some specific things that staff had recommended in their staff report regarding the placement of the house. It goes beyond what would be required of the zoning ordinance as far as setbacks. We did ask them to locate the driveway, so that it could be accessed from the side, although they are still showing it as front loading, is m y understanding. T he idea was to facilitate a road coming from some other direction, not immediately off of Victory Road. We did have them set it back a little bit further in anticipation of a future landscape lot along Victory Road. De Weerd: I think they agreed to that last week. Powell: I was just -- yes. I just was getting to your point of if this is denied and they just come in for a building permit on sewer with 2,100 square foot minimum, what do we lose? Those are the things that you might lose. Sheffield: Madam President, we did redesign the plans, so it could have either a side entry or a front loaded garage. It was an almost perfectly square garage and we had the plan designed to put a header in that side, so that if we ever did get development on that lot, we could make an end driveway, instead of a front driveway. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Elliott, did you -- she said they didn't want to -- on and off of Victory Road. Where are you coming on and off from? Sheffield: Right now it's Victory Road. Bird: That's what I was going to say. I don't know where you can come on and off, unless you build an expensive bridge over that canal. De Weerd: Well, I think staff thought if the rest of that developed also residential, they would delete the access off of Victory and make a bridge over the canal. I think that's what the thought was. Powell: Or that it be accessed from the larger property to the west and I should point out we have -- there is an application coming in for the property to the west, so you will likely see some commercial development occurring in that area. It's already there. There is some additional commercial development. I would like to point out that the site I- I' Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 29 of 58 plan that the applicant has submitted does -- the access is -- comes off and through the landscape lot, not through -- the landscape lot does not go all the way across the frontage there and the applicant is -- their driveway is through the landscape lot. De Weerd: How big is that, Elliott? Sheffield: I beg your pardon? De Weerd: How big is this piece? Sheffield: 1.88 acres. If I could address Anna also, Madam President. De Weerd: Okay. Sheffield: On that landscape lot, when we reverse the houses it's what happened to get the driveway on that side, so we could have access. So, that's how it got partially into that landscape lot. Powell: Yeah. I should have gone into it. That was a result of staff's request that they push the house back further in anticipation of that additional 20 feet of landscape lot being provided at -- if the property were to redevelop, that the landscape lot does not extend across the full frontage of Victory Road, so I guess we were anticipating that there would be a replat at some point and wanted to push the house away from Victory Road and that's when the driveway shifted location to the landscape lot. If they were to just come in for a building permit, I don't believe we would allow them to take access off the landscape lot in and of itself. I guess they'd have to just show that they had an access agreement with the other owner, which since it's them, it's probably pretty easy to get, but -- De Weerd: Well, this is a Public Hearing. Is there anyone else who wants to testify on this application? Any other questions for Mr. Sheffield? Okay. Any other comments, Elliott? Sheffield: I don't think so. De Weerd: Okay. Any comments, Council, before the Public Hearing is closed? Staff, any other comments? Powell: No, ma'am. De Weerd: Okay. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: With that, I would move that we close the Public Hearing CUP 03-047 for Observation Point Subdivision, request for a Conditional Use Permit. (/. Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 30 of 58 Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on Item No. 11. All those in favor I say aye. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Discussion? Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: As I -- Mr. Sheffield stated that it was 1.67 acres. If they wanted to come back and replat it -- well, Bill or Bill can answer it. Then, they could probably put five houses in there; right? On an R-4? And wouldn't have to have a -- I mean, we could set a minimum, but it wouldn't have to be 2,100. Nary: Probably three with setbacks, roadways, all of that. Bird: Probably get three or four lots on it. Nary: Right. Bird: Well, if you got 1.6 acres I think he said. Sheffield: 1.88. De Weerd: 1.8 Bird: What? Sheffield: 1.88. Bird: 1.88? Sheffield: Yes. Bird: So, you're looking at, what, 70, 80 thousand square feet. And taking out roadway and everything, you'd still have enough to have four -- easily four or five 8,000 square foot lots. AnyWay, that they could do that. So, that's just something to throw out. De Weerd: I guess as part of discussion, even though there hasn't been a motion made, it's a nonconforming use, but I -- as I recall another nonconforming use, I think this one fits -- fits the area. It -- I don't have a problem with it and I know you don't want to set precedent, but this is not a bad precedent to set when you get one house, when you could get four and an improvement from what you have and a green space. It seems -- ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 31 of 58 it seems like it would be an asset to the community and most nonconforming use requests that we get are not necessarily an asset. So, I guess that would be my only comment. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: I guess my last comment is I donlt even disagree with what you're saying, but it is a legal shoehorn to do it this way. What they should -- my opinion, what they should do is replat this lot, take it out of Observation Point, come in with one house, two houses, whatever, and let us evaluate that. But this is a shoehorn method to get around doing that and they were told when this was platted that that's what they would have to do and I think that's what they have to do. I don't disagree with what you're saying that what they are wanting to do is better than what's there, but that's not the standard that we are supposed to live by is just do what's better than what's there. There is lots of places in this town that we would probably have it run amuck if that was the standard and that's not what we are here to do. They can replat this, they can figure out what's the appropriate thing here, whether it's 0 ffice w as like 0 riginally intended 0 r talked a bout back in 2 000 0 r whether it was 0 ne house, two houses, three houses, whatever. I mean -- but that's -- that's the right method, at least to me, that they should follow and that's not what they are wanting to do and what we are wanting to do perpetuates a situation that we donlt, at least to me, want to continue. We told them what to do and that's what they need to do, so -- Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: My last comment. I agree with Councilman Nary that they can do that, but I'm going to tell you, this Council is not going to let a 1 ,400 square foot house go down there if they replat, because we haven't done anything around Observation or that to do that, so I would personally feel better allowing a 1 ,400 square foot house go on it like it is, instead of having them replat it and put four or five houses in there. That's my final words. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: I will make a motion. I'm going to move to deny CUP 03-047, request for a Conditional Use Permit to demolish the existing home and rebuild one single family residential dwelling for a caretaker's quarters on Lot 2, Block 2, of Observation Point Subdivision in an R-4 zone by RF Construction at 500 East Victory Road, pursuant to the staff comments of denial from the Planning and Zoning Department, as well as the discussion of both the previous hearing and this hearing and for Council to prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order for denial. ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 32 of 58 McCandless: Second. Bird: Question. De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Bill, did you say the denial of Planning and Zoning Commission? Nary: No, the Planning and Zoning Department. Bird: Oh. Okay. Sorry. De Weerd: So, your motion is to deny the request? Nary: Yes. De Weerd: And to not approve the recommendation of Planning and Zoning Commission. Nary: Correct. De Weerd: Okay. Well, it's been moved and seconded to deny Item No.11, CUP 03- 047. Mr. Clerk, will you, please, call roll. Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, nay; Bird, nay. Bird: I knew we were going to do that. De Weerd: We need the Mayor. Nary: That's the problem with not having a fifth -- Mr. Wardle, do you -- Mr. Clerk, do you have the oath? De Weerd: Yeah. We can do an emergency-- Bird: Well, now, Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: We ran into this last week and we got it solved, so which one of you yeas want to -- De Weerd: Which one of you yahoos -- Bird: Well, I bent last week for you, so -- De Weerd: 11m not changing my vote, so -- (- Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 33 of 58 Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. Nichols, I know under parliamentary rules that if it's a tie vote the motion fails. It would appear that we would have -- if we went the opposite direction that we may have a tie vote again and the motion would fail. So, then, what? De Weerd: Mr. Nichols, you earn your money now. Nichols: Madam President, Members of the Council, I think, then, the matter is not decided and you would have to continue this on your agenda and you would have to bring it up and vote on it and bring it up and vote on it and bring it up and vote on it until a decision is made. Bird: Until we get five people here. De Weerd: Okay. Well, I would entertain a motion to continue. Bird: Do we have to open the Public Hearing? Nichols: Madam President, Members of the Council, you do not have to open the Public Hearing, it's just a matter of making the decision. Bird: Madam President? Nichols: But, Madam President, if I can interject a little further, you have the addition -- I mean what happens if it goes into January and those Council members who have not had an opportunity to at least read the record. So, that I don't know the answer to. But as long as it's in front of Council, I don't think you have to reopen the Public Hearing to continue it. You can just simply continue it on the agenda for decision. De Weerd: Well, Mr. Berg, I would suggest that when these minutes are typed up, to, please, package them and get them out to the new Council members, as well as the Mayor. I did talk to him today and he did indicate a desire that he would be at one or two meetings before the end of his term and so we would hope that is the case, so if you can at least get information out to the Mayor and the new Council members, so they are prepared, we will at least have this resolved by the middle of January. Berg: Madam President, I will do so, but I think we currently are getting disks from the Council meetings, so they do have a file electronically of what you have been seeing throughout the process, but I will make sure that they will have a written copy, so that they can see it separately. De Weerd: Thank you. Bird: Madam President? ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 34 of 58 De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I would move that we continue CUP 03-047, Conditional Use Permit for Observation Point Subdivision in an R-4 zone by RF Construction until -- let's go next week. De Weerd: I would suggest at least the first week -- Bird: December 9, 2003. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to continue Item No. 11 until December 9, 2003. All those in favor say aye. Okay. All ayes. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: And since both our Council members were here last week and Mr. Wardle was here this week, they probably have the advantage of being at least prepared and perhaps the Mayor will be back with us on the 9th, so - Item 12. Public Hearing: CUP 03-042 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Carl's Jr. restaurant with drive-thru service window by Clayton Jones - north of Intersection of South Meridian Road, East Central Drive and South Main Street: De Weerd: Okay. Moving on. Item 12 is a Public Hearing for CUP 03-042, request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Carl's Junior restaurant with drive-thru service window by Clayton Jones and we will open the staff -- or the Public Hearing with staff comments. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Before the staff report, I just wanted to make it clear on the public record that I did have a discussion with Mr. Jones after the last denial of this request regarding his application. I don't even know if what he submitted is what he talked to me about. I told him at the time I wasn't going to commit to anything in regards to this application, but simply he was giving me information, asking some clarification from the last meeting, so I just wanted to make sure that was on the record, that we have had a conversation, but it wasn't -- I don't even know it's the same site plan as what he talked to me about, so -- De Weerd: And you talked to him before a new application was filed. Nary: Right. And before a new application was filed. (~~- I, Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 35 of 58 De Weerd: Okay. Any problem with that, Council? Nichols: Madam President. No, the requirement of the historic preservation case is that it be disclosed on the record and, technically, that probably only applies to things after an application is filed and so Councilman Nary has gone beyond that disclosure preapplication. Nary: That's why we are here. De Weerd: Okay. Staff. Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, this site is located between Meridian and Main Street. There is an existing Kentucky Fried Chicken on the property. We will briefly go through some of these things. I did want to focus on the new site plan to show you what it has. Or this shows more of the site. I'm sorry. I didn't notice that Christy h ad t rimmed up t he I ast one so much. B ut yau can see the Kentucky Fried Chicken off to the south in this area here. Focusing on the site plan, they would come in on off of Meridian Road and they would enter in this location. Got to go down. Yeah. She trimmed off too much. They come off Meridian Road, through here. This would be the drive aisle, the stacking lane. There is enough room for seven cars in that stacking and, then, they would exit approximately at the middle of the site where they could go either to Meridian Road or Main Street. In the staff report Steve went to great lengths to describe the previous approvals and the concerns -- or, 11m sorry, previous applications and the previous denials and to detail out what the Council's concerns were regarding those applications and then he addressed how the new site plan did address those concerns. So, the primary concerns were congestion, circulation, stacking, and parking. Based on Council's previous concerns with the site plan and based on the zoning code, staff had recommended approval of this project as it went to the Planning and Zoning Commission and they have forwarded their approval to you as well. To summarize the Public Hearing, they did hear from the applicant Clayton Jones, who testified in favor. Skip Hofferber, who is the owner of Taco Time behind the Chevron on the other side of Main Street. Phil Atteberry representing KFC. They still had a lot of concerns about congestion and blocking their stacking lanes, which begin right -- their aisle -- drive-thru aisle begins at this location. I believe they have room for five vehicles to stack, whereas the applicant has provided room for seven vehicles to stack. Jonathan Gibbs, the owner 0 f t he p raperty, testified a bout the parking a rrangements a nd t he Welcome to Meridian sign. I'll get back to that sign in just a moment. The key issues of discussion were the Welcome to Meridian sign and, then, congestion, circulation, stacking and parking. And, again, based on the concerns that Council had expressed last time, staff did feel that this site plan met those concerns. Specifically, there are -- they will be providing more parking spaces than are currently on the site and the parking exceeds the requirements for our code by about 50 percent -- or I mean it's almost nearly double what is required by our ordinance. In the second site design the drive-thru aisle, people were required to the cross the drive-thru aisle to get to the main entrance of the property. That's not the case here. They will be parking here, as well as over here and, then, I think there is some handicapped spots here. This parking is likely to be used more by Kentucky Fried Chicken and the proposal is to label these for employee use, although I think there was -- there was a bit of testimony about whether or not it would -- ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 36 of 58 that would occur. I think if there were open ones, then, the customers would probably use those. Congestion was really the outstanding issue for the Council as to whether or not this site can just support the two drive-thrus that are proposed and that is a judgment call on the Council -- part of the Council at this point. The other one was circulation. We do believe the circulation is improved. The drive-thru aisle, although they have to wrap around quite a bit, it unloads at kind of a central location, rather than right here next to the entrance onto Main so they have kind of provided a central location for this -- the output of the drive-thru lane. Regarding the Welcome to Meridian sign, this was proposed -- here we go. This was one of the older ones. But it was proposed to be basically in this location here. That portion of property is within the KFC lease. The owner is -- suspects that he will not be able to get permission for a sign in that location. He is working with the Ada County Highway District to get a license agreement to put that sign in the highway district property here. It is a very visible location, as you're aware, at the junction of those two streets. They have proposed a rather nice sign feature. The question that came up at the planning commission -- let's see if there is a copy of the sign. No. The question that came up at the planning commission w as whether 0 r n at it w as a ppropriate for what t he city wanted to d 0 i n future efforts. So, the city kind of gave -- we put a condition of approval that the city would have until September of 2004 to come up with an alternative sign design, if they wanted one, and, then, the applicant had agreed to -- to have a 5,000 dollar bond out there that could be used for the construction of that sign. If the city couldn't come up with a design, then, they would construct the sign as they had proposed it. I do have all the old landscape plans available for you. Oh, I do need to point out one minor change. You will notice here it says landscape plan not revised. In reviewing this with Steve, we did realize that this landscape island here needs to be trimmed just to get the full drive aisle width and, then, FCe -- sse -- the trash folks had concerns about this landscape island, because it blocks t heir access to this, b ut a 5 yau s ee 0 n this 0 ne, those two areas are circled. We just increased the radius on that corner, so that they'd have an opportunity there. We had to pull out I believe two parking spaces there, so that there would be room for the trash trucks, the front-enders -- front load ones to maneuver. It's still, according to our standards, over-parked, but I do understand that there are a lot of people out there. I believe that addresses staffs remaining concerns and summarized the Planning and Zoning Commission. I would sit for any other questions. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Anna, you guys are for this now and where has it helped in the congestion? You're shoving the traffic from around the drive-thru out into the traffic that comes through the Taco Bell and it's -- as I understand it -- I might be wrong, but as I understand it, the same guy owns all that property that has Bolo's, Taco Bell, and KW on there and everything else -- I don't know what percentage of business that Kentucky Fried has that actually goes in and sits down and eats in the restaurant, compared to drive-thru, but I don't think it's major. Carl's might have more sit down deal and you still -- you know, you're bringing cars around, except for one place to get to the -- inside the store, you got to come over and enter and you do have some parking there, but you don't have -- if it's crowded you don't have enough parking, so why have we -- just ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 37 of 58 because they took the drive-thru and exited it out on the north side, instead of the east side, all of a sudden it's approvable. Powell: Madam President, Members of the Council, I suspect that was a bit of a rhetorical question, but I will answer it. As I tried to point out in the presentation, we tried to look at the previous denials, the two previous denials, and what Council's concerns were and, then, we look at the zoning ordinance and from the Council's past concerns and our zoning ordinance, it would appear that this was an improvement over the past designs and probably an improvement over the existing structure, which is larger and traffic circulation doesn't seem to work and I also tried to make it clear that congestion still is the key question. Can this -- ifs the question of whether or not this site can support another drive-thru has been discussed by you two times now and the answer at those were not absolutely no, they were, no, this is site design doesn't do that. So, yes, that is still a remaining question and maybe the answer is, no, it just is not possible to support another drive-thru business. But based on Council's past actions and based on the zoning ordinance, staff did feel that this -- that they could recommend approval to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Bird: Thank you. De Weerd: Any other questions for staff? Okay. Is the applicant here? Is the testimony you provide tonight t he truth, t he whole t ruth, a nd nothing b ut the truth, soh elp you God? Jones: Yes, it is. De Weerd: Please state your name and address. Jones: Clayton Jones, 14071 West Rochester Drive in Boise and I have got some of these designs that may help you -- you can look at them. The last page is an 11-by-17. I'd like to thank you for allowing me to present a fresh look at -- at this project and I'd just like to take you back for just a moment to about a year and a half ago when -- when the Kentucky Fried Chicken opened with their KFC w hat a wonderful dual concept it was. They were busy as heck, cars parking on side streets, just -- it was just an incredible -- incredible opening and great honeymoon period. Then, some idiot came before you and proposed a -- to put a 4,000 square foot building on that same lot while it was in the honeymoon period and going crazy with about 150 seats. I have repented. And what -- what I wanted to point out here to start is that the conditions on the site are different today than they were a year and a half ago. The businesses over there are now benefiting from that first trial period and the issues that were before the Council at that time don't exist to that great extent. We are here again before you today, because at our last meeting Mr. Nary graciously gave a few suggestions as to how we may approach the Council again to -- for approval. I appreciate the meeting that we had with Mr. Nary and this is pretty much the site plan that we discussed. I also appreciate our Planning and Zoning and Anna and Steve, they have given a couple of very, very good suggestions that helped the project. If I could just take a second or two to go through the store and the layout and how it might meet concerns, lid appreciate it. We are proposing a 2,500 square foot building, which is just a tad large than the building ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 38 of 58 that we proposed last time around. It was 2,000 feet. But what we have done is we have kind of commingled two of our prototype buildings and we've really kept the same size kitchen in the larger prototype to accommodate for faster service and it just -- it's a better flow for us, while at the same time we have limited our dining room space to 45 seats. So, we are, in essence, encouraging people to use the drive-thru, rather than the dining room. Our normal dining rooms are about 100 seats. So, we are limiting that space to encourage people to go through the drive-thru. You will notice -- and this was actually Anna's suggestion -- that we move the speaker a little bit forward to accommodate seven cars behind the speaker, which would definitely keep the cars out of the aisle ways, which is going to really benefit the congestion situation. On the KFC side -- and what happens, they can accommodate three cars behind their speaker, that fourth car is, actually, in their parking lot. By the time they get to seven cars, they have actually blocked all of their parking spaces in front of their store. So, I think we have done -- my architect has done a good job to design this in a beneficial way. Again, we are -- as staff commented, we are exiting in the middle to give the folks in the drive-thru through the opportunity to go in either direction, so that they are not going to backup at Main Street or 1 st Street, they can have their choice. If we could have the larger -- thank you. On the Main Street side, it's pretty much understood or thought that that's going to be used by mostly employees. You know, we are going to have probably six cars or so on our staff. I'm sure KFC's about the same. I would assume that that would be used mostly for parking -- for employees over there. However, we are not going to limit it to just employees if there are open spots. On the south side of our drive-thru lane there is parking for -- really, you know, it's on the lot that we are proposing, but it's specifically designed to accommodate the KFC folks. W e have also delineated that parking with a small barrier fence to encourage the KFC folks to park there, so that they are going the other way, rather than -- than coming over to our store. In front of our building there we have -- excuse me. To the west we have got approximately 18 spots, which for a 45 seat dining room should accommodate things very nicely. The two spots that are closest to the Taco Bell location, we envision those to be probably the manager and assistant manager, some cars that aren't going to be moving back and forth very often. I think in our last session with the Council, we had handicapped spots there and it just didn't seem like it was a good idea to do that into the traffic. The project -- 11m happy to say that the project does address all the concerns that staff had regarding the flow, congestion and even parking. I think that KFC ends up with the same amount of parking spots that they are currently enjoying. We have adequate parking to accommodate our use and Taco Bell and Bolo's still have the 60 additional parking spots on their lot. The objection to our project is pretty much I think centered around the drive-thru as being a hindrance to the lot. Well, I would, actually, submit that the drive-thru, actually, solves the problems, because it's encouraging people to come in, get t heir food, and get 0 ut, rather than sit d own for 30,40 minutes a nd take up the valuable parking space. So, I would submit that the drive-thru and our use actually solve the problem over there as it's designed now, maybe not how I first proposed it to you. The amenity that was talked about regarding the sign, we are happy to provide a - - what I think is a really nice -- really nice sign for the city and if the -- you know, if -- if it's adopted we will be glad to put it in. If the city has another design, we will be glad to contribute towards that. The exciting part is I do have the license agreement from ACHD for the sign. It's location is -- is pretty much on the point of the intersection of Main Street with 1 st. The location -- the exact location is going to be -- have to be (' Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 39 of 58 determined after the ACHD construction. And I believe this is in staff's packet. They have got the designs of the sign. But we would be glad to provide the city with a wonderiul amenity and we were excited that ACHD had some extra ground for us to use. We are also able, as you can see on the site plan that we gave you, that we are able to address the concerns of the sanitary district. Just some final points. I donlt mean to take up too much time. But I visited the site every Thursday, Friday, Saturday and on other occasions during the last three months and have found that there are -- that there is not the congestion that there once was, that the site flow works on both sides. The KFC side works just fine. The Taco Bell site works just fine. The only problem is -- is that middle part where people are kind of parking where ever they want and really creating some congestion, especially 0 n that west side. B ut 0 ur site plan addresses that and, actually, improves the site and solves the current problems. So far this is the sixth hearing that I have been to and I really hate to impose and take up time, but to this point I havenlt -- I don't believe there is any -- there has been any Meridian resident that came in and testified in opposition to the Carl's Junior. As a matter of fact, I think that they will welcome another choice at that location. The only folks at this point that have been opposed to it have been the competitors on both sides and I don't know if they are -- you know, the first time, you know, maybe they had a right to, but I think with this plan addressing all the concerns, the staff's concerns, and our concerns, frankly, I think that -- I think they -- that they shouldn't be able to object at this point. You know, I don't know if it's an attempt to protect their own businesses or -- and I don't know if they think I'm that big of a threat, but I don't believe so. I think that all of together will actually create a good synergy and, actually, attract additional guests to the -- to the site. Now, I don't -- and, you know, who knows, it may be a little pay back or something for past misdeeds of mine. But, in conclusion, I think we have brought you a good project that is in harmony with the adjacent uses, that solves the problems at hand that are currently on the site and that meets all the -- actually, meets and exceeds the criteria and the ordinances of the city and I would ask that Council approve the restaurant and drive-thru use. lid stand for any questions. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Jones -- and I know this is something Carlls Junior knows. What percent of business in a Carl's Junior is sit-down trade? Jones: Currently at my other restaurants we are at about 58 percent drive-thru, so that would be 42 percent dining room. Those are with nice, big, beautiful dining rooms. This one is going to be quite small and limited -- limited seats, so I am going to assume or suspect that this location will be up in the 70 percent. Bird: Do you have the one at Crossroads? Jones: Yes. Bird: Okay. And that is 58 percent drive-thru? Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 40 of 58 Jones: That particular one is like 52. People do go into there specifically for the playground use and they stay there a long time and enjoy it. De Weerd: Okay. Thank you. Jones: Thank you. De Weerd: Okay. Are there any others that would want to testify in favor for this project? Please raise your right hand. Is the testimony you provide tonight the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Gibbs: Yes. De Weerd: Please state your name and address. Gibbs: Jonathan Gibbs. I'm the administrative partner In G&H Enterprises, 9502 Scorpio, Boise, Idaho. De Weerd: Thank you. Gibbs: It's a pleasure for me to be here again testifying. I wish we hadn't had to go this many times, but we appreciate you guys' patience on this project and we have tried to -- as we have gone through these meetings and heard your testimonies and the problems with the project, we have tried to accommodate those by making the changes to make everything fit on here. I know there is a lot of concern still from certain people about the drive-thru traffic and how much congestion it is. If they do very -- if they are moving them along very smoothly, they are lucky to get one car through the drive-thru in a minute and you probably have at any stoplight in the city that has a minute timing on the stoplight, many cars backed up. There is not a lot of congestion through a drive-thru if they are running them smoothly at a minute at a time. There is a lot of room coming out of that exit there adjacent to the Taco Bell to turn either direction without going over into the Taco Bell drive-thru lane at all. There is -- there would be no congestion on the drive-thru lane at all and I think that was mentioned by someone, that there would be congestion there. We changed that -- the last drawing we had I think everybody had to turn to the east there out of that drive-thru and at you guys' suggestion we made that drive-thru exit, so it would -- there would be more room and that you could go either way easily. There is plenty of room on that new drawing to turn either way on the entrance- exit, either to go to Meridian or to Main Street now with this new drawing. I think it's an excellent plan. I think they would probably run 30 percent inside and 70 percent through that drive-thru and I don't think there would be a lot of congestion on that lot with this setup and with them in there. De Weerd: Thank you. Any questions? Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 41 of 58 Nary: Mr. Gibbs, how far across that lane is the -- when you come out of that drive-thru? You said there is a left clearance from the Taco Bell drive-thru lane. How much space is that? Gibbs: What is the distance across there on that -- De Weerd: What is the distance? Nichols: Madam President -- De Weerd: If you could, please, answer that. Gibbs: What? De Weerd: We need the question answered on the Public Hearing. You need to answer it for us. Gibbs: Yes. There is 23 feet. Nary: Twenty-three feet from here to there? Isn't this -- is this the divider of the -- this is the Taco Bell lane right here; correct? Gibbs: Yes. Nary: So, you're saying from this exit out, comes out -- that's the old one. From this exit out to this, the Taco Bell lane is somewhere over here, is 23 feet? Bird: Your architect engineer don't know what he's doing there. De Weerd: I'm sorry, we will have to have -- Gibbs: I don't have the plans with the dimensions on it. Nichols: Madam President, somebody that's actual got scale drawings of both of those locations in -- that can measure and give you the information, rather than asking Mr. Gibbs to speculate, I think -- or ask somebody else in the audience, it will go faster. De Weerd: Thank you. Gibbs: I don't know. De Weerd: Good answer. Any other questions? Thank you. Is that in our packet? We will ask the applicant to respond to that when he comes up for the rebuttal. It is a Public Hearing. Is there any further testimony in favor of this application? Okay. We will take testimony in opposition. Is Mr. -- well, is Skip here? Skip, would you like to testify? Okay. Payne: I'm Bruce Payne from Taco Bell. Meridian City Council November 18,2003 Page 42 of 58 De Weerd: Okay. Bruce, if you will, please -- is the testimony you provide tonight the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Payne: It is. De Weerd: Okay. Please state your name and address. Payne: Bruce Payne. 1625 Fairmont Drive, Weiser, Idaho. I'm not from Meridian. 11m representing Taco Bell in that location. I'm curious as to how many feet it's going to be between my -- our drive-up -- his drive-up exit and our building. If it's 23 feet, you got a car that's going to go in between that, plus two lanes of traffic -- lanes of traffic going both ways. 0 ur biggest concern is we a re a Iso doing, you know, 65 percent of 0 ur business through the drive-up, which amounts to about 400 cars a day, plus what the Carl's Junior is going to do and their cars a day, plus what A&W is doing and their cars a day. It's going to get really, really -- it's already really crowded in there. I have been there at lunch, worked at lunch, worked there at dinner, the traffic is horrible to get in and 0 ut 0 f t here. I mean it's backing u p to both - - both sides, both highways. 0 ur biggest concern is 0 ur guests. 0 ur guests a re going to beg etting possibly in traffic accidents -- it's just crowded in there constantly and just -- the idea of putting more and more people there is going to increase business, I mean it gets to the point where it's ludicrous, where you can't get in and you can't get out and, you know, great, so there is a lot of parking, but you have got four -- our 400 cars going in and out of there, their 400 cars, and A&W's 400 cars going in there a day, that's -- I mean Albertson's would be glad to have that many cars come into their parking lot a day. So, I mean our concern is 0 ur guests, 0 ur employees, a nd the safety 0 f them walking a round a II these cars. And, then, Bolols, you know, if anybody has been there on a Thursday, Friday, or Saturday night, they take a lot -- there is a lot of people in there also. Traffic is horrible in there. I don't know. I like Carlls Junior, I eat at your locations, but it's not -- competition is great, but too much competition is almost scary and we are concerned about traffic and our guests and our employees. Thank you very much. De Weerd: Thank you. Any other testimony? Is the testimony you provide tonight the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Hofferber: Yes. De Weerd: Please state your name and address. Hofferber: My name is Skip Hofferber, 2074 South Pebble Creek, Boise. And I do have the Taco Time on 785 Corporate across from there and I did in bring in some pictures for the staff and Mr. Berg copied them for you, so you can look at -- and these pictures were taken -- they are dated at the bottom of October 31 st during lunchtime, roughly 12:20 to 12:50, and as you can tell -- could you -- excuse me. Anna, could you put up the one site plan that shows the KFC and -- there you go. And if you look at the pictures, the lot is full here, down along the side. There are cars illegally parked here. There are cars parked here now. And these people aren't even open yet. I understand there is a cross-access, cross-easement parking with Bolols and it is -- Bolo's -- there is Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 43 of 58 a lot of them that park there and they park there for hours. There is not enough parking now, let alone the congestion. If you look at the -- how the cars are going back and forth between here with cars parked and I'm trying to figure how you're going to -- six, eight employees, as Mr. Jones says, where they are going to park, where their people are going to park, their customers. On our site we have four ingress-egresses off onto Main Street, Progress, and East Corporate. There is two on one. So, we only have 48 seats, too, and I run roughly 52 percent through my drive-thru. We have cross-access parking of about 65 between the Chevron and myself, and with 48 seats and only one drive-thru. I'm trying to figure out by adding another drive-thru and another -- only 45, 48 seats, where that's going to -- you know, the improvement has been made in this new project here. And also coming out here with these -- these are 90 degree corners and out here, like you say, this distance here you have two lanes of traffic' going each way, plus a drive-thru turn in over there, plus the Taco Bell drive-thru and I -- I was there tonight at 6: 10 prior to coming here and it's the same way there tonight and they are not open. So, 11m trying to figure out where this is all going to -- you know, they made it better by, you know, changing a few things and backing up seven cars in the stack lane and that, because, like on my side, like I said, we have four ingress- egresses. On this one here they have two for four businesses, three of them wanting drive-thrus, two of them already having drive-thrus. I just think the congestion is too great there and I think it's -- you know, he calls it competition, whatever, sure, well, you know, don't want to see 12 restaurants in there and when you try to shoe horn them in like you're doing here, I think it's going to be a detriment to everybody and the safety of people. I know Mr. Gibbs testified a t the Planning a nd Zoning that h e h ad two 0 ther people without drive-thrus that he could put in there and I -- I wonder why it hasn't been pursued, you know, just for obvious reasons of safety and accessibility for all the other tenants. So, that's all. There is one other thing. I know the amenities, they were talking about, I know I spoke with a few of the other business people, as I am here in Meridian, and we would be more than happy to get an entrance, because we are proud of being in business in Meridian and I think it would be nice to have a sign there and I think we have -- among ourselves, there is five or six of us, talked that we would be more than happy to put that together and have a sign there, because I think it would be nice, you know. I mean I don't think you need to approve this. We can get the sign done for you on a basis of the existing business, people in the city. So, thank you. De Weerd: Thank you, Mr. Hofferber. Powell: Madam President, while there is a break in between, the narrowest dimension on the drive aisle at the -- at the western location is 27 feet to the edge of the Taco Bell drive-thru, so there is a differentiated paving area there. The maximum dimension is 30 feet. So, it varies between 27 and 30 feet. Minimum drive aisle requirements per the code are 25 feet. De Weerd: And so what's the distance between the drive aisle and the building? Powell: We didn't measure that. Hold on. Nary: Madam President? Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 44 of 58 De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: While you're looking at that, Mrs. Powell, where is the window for Taco Bell? Is it directly across here? No. No. No. For Taco Bell. Right there? So, the lights from these cars are going to shine right in that window? Bird: From right here to right there you're saying -- how wide is that? Powell: It's 27 feet at the western end and 30 feet at the east end. No. I'm sorry. The western end of the drive-thru exit, from this point right there to that point -- Bird: To that point right there? Powell: Is 27 feet. Bird: Is 27 feet? Powell: Yes. Then, there is an additional 12 feet for the-- Bird: But it's full of cars. Powell: Right. I'm sorry. Councilmember -- or President de Weerd had asked what it was to the building, so it's an additional 12 feet. De Weerd: Okay. Nary: And my question was the drive-thru window is directly across from this exit? Powell: I'm not sure. You will need to have someone else testify to that. 11m not sure. . De Weerd: And we can ask the applicant when he comes for rebuttal. Is there anymore testimony? Didn't mean to look at you, Mr. Atteberry, but -- is the testimony you provide tonight the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Atteberry: Yes, it is. De Weerd: Please state your name and address. Atteberry: My name is Phil Atteberry. My address 1756 Stony Brook Court, Eagle. De Weerd: Thank you. Atteberry: I believe this is the sixth meeting that I have come to on this same project here and it's still -- you know, the building's changed and the drive-thru's changed and the dimension of the building has changed three times. We still have a drive-thru here, a proposed drive-thru here, and a drive-thru over here at KFC. The distance between this drive-thru and KFC's drive-thru is just -- it's just so congested in there now, I can't imagine what it would be like with a third drive-thru in there. This designer spent some // { Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 45 of 58 time on it, I -- this redesign for this entrance-exit here is great. I think that's something we should do anyway, whether Carl's Junior goes there or somebody else goes there. Up here we really need that, because that gets blocked off when a car goes across out of here right now. I mean that's a good idea, but these right here and these here -- some of these people a re going tab e Carl's Junior's customers. Their front door is here. And at some point they are walking through this drive lane here and the landscaping and young children and I have been doing KFC for 30 years and 20 years ago when drive-thru's came around we used to put drive-thrus any way we could around a building. The city just -- it was something new. But this day and time, drive-thrus, you have to have lanes that are out of the pedestrian parking I would think, that we try to make drive-thrus so that they -- you could get in and out very easily and adding a third drive-thru to this small area is not going to make this conducive to more business. Commissioner Centers at the last meeting, he said, well, we will pass it on and if it's just too congested for the customers, they just won't go there. I really don't think that's what our attitude should be, that it's just too congested. Customers don't go there. He even testified that he won't go there now it's so congested. I just don't think that's what we ought to be doing when we are planning out another drive-thru and businesses. You know, KFC has been in business for 30 years, we spent a lot of money putting a brand new building there, and are we excited about Carl's Junior going in there with a drive- thru? No. Would we be excited about anybody going in there with a drive-thru? We won't be. That's no secret on my part. Because if it gets too congested there, we all lose. Nobody -- nobody does well. The city doesn't win on that deal either. It's just that people will avoid that corner. So, I would hope that the City Council would deny the requ est. De Weerd: Thank you. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Atteberry, that's basically -- if you didn't come around the building, is basically -- and you went straight out, is basically your old drive-thru. Atteberry: That's correct. Bird: And it was a pain in the -- Atteberry: It was a pain. Bird: It was a pain in the throat that way. Atteberry: Correct. Bird: And you had no other drive-thrus in there. Atteberry: Right. When we bought the restaurant three and a half years ago, we immediately started the process to change that. I mean we were busy. We were out in Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 46 of 58 the road, because it was just not conducive to continually doing business. I mean somebody else was going to come in with a better drive-thru and they were going to go there for convenience, because ours was just so dang busy there. And this drive-thru exit right in front of Taco Bell, I mean I -- speaking for Taco Bell, to have a drive-thru that's exiting right at their window with traffic going this way and this way, plus a drive- thru lane, to say that that's not going to be congested and this is going to be better than what it was now, I would have to disagree. De Weerd: Any other questions? Thank you. Atteberry: Thank you. De Weerd: Is there any further testimony? Okay. Would the applicant -- Jones: Thank you for the opportunity. I just wanted to clarify that staff is pretty close it looks like about just under 30 feet on the west side of the drive-thru exit, plus the drive- thru aisle for Taco Bell, so 42 feet up until the building is the narrower point and, then, add a couple of feet on the eastern side. Just to I guess, rebut a few points. Skip mentioned his restaurant across the way, that they do 52 percent drive-thru. I think we are going to be doing way more. Way more. And his -- actually, his concerns seemed to be the parking that wasn't adequate. Well, I think his 21 spots that he's got on his lot seem to do him just -- just fine and I would stipulate with my 48 seats that mine would be adequate as well. The other point, ACHD in their report did a study and they felt that the site was adequate to accommodate the additional traffic that might be generated by our building and the Taco Bell -- I haventt met this gentleman before, but I would love to have 400 cars go through my drive-thru in a day. I donlt -- thafs not going to happen. Anyway, so we are probably exaggerating just a tad to make a point, but I think we have done a great job to accommodate the site, the needs of the site, and we have, actually, done a good job to improve it. Mr. Atteberry -- you know, I think there is lots of kids that are, actually, going up across his parking lot as his drive-thru gets backed up and I'm sure that the cars and his guests take just as much concern as my guests will for the safety of all that are in there. People arentt going to be zooming around at 20 miles an hour. So, anyway, with that I want to stay positive. I think this is a good project. I appreciate all the comments from staff, from Council, and helping us to finally present you with a -- with a workable plan. De Weerd: Questions for Mr. Jones? You know, I guess I do have a question. Once they started doing the measurements, I really zeroed in on those two parking spots there. Why on earth do you have parking spots in that drive area? Jones: The two just to the west? De Weerd: Yeah. If you don't need those, why do you want them there? Jones: We could remove them. You know, because everybody's concern seems to be the parking. We, generallYJ have a manager and a shift leader on. Those could easily go for those employees that are working the eight hour shifts and they wouldn't be going ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 47 of 58 in and out of those spaces all the time, so I don't believe that would be an issue, but if that were a condition of approval, we would be glad to remove those two. De Weerd: You know, I guess I would -- this is a much better plan than we have been presented, you know, and I do appreciate it. I just -- I guess with the Bolo's, it's a good thing that Taco Bell has 65 percent drive-thru traffic, because Bolo's is a sit down -- you know, and they take up the parking that Taco Bell has. But the three uses with Taco Bell, Carl1s Junior and KFC are -- all peak at the same time, you know, it's all driven at the same time and I guess when we denied this last time and the suggestion was, well, we will come down with a sit-down restaurant or something. But, you know, I guess I look for a use that would compliment what's there and that would be more of a morning type of thing or, you know, something that doesn't compete. I'd hate to suggest another drive-thru because I think three drive-thrus are really too much for that area and I know I have said t hat before. But even a drive-th-ru Moxie Java, that gets the bulk of their traffic early in the morning when these other ones are not hitting their peaks, seems to make more sense than a drive-thru and peaks at the same time as everyone else does in that same complex and today we heard a presentation from property owners that had a concern with what ACHD is -- they are going to lose that turn lane in there because that will become a traffic lane once some of the road improvements are readjusted. So, that brings other concerns of accessibility into that area as well. So, have you looked at what those impacts are going to have as well to this area? Jones: Madam President, Members of the Council, I guess we have looked at the ACHD plan that, actually, on Meridian is proposing to prohibit left turns, that's left in and left out, so that will make a right out -- right out situation from the property, so we won't have people stacking back waiting to exit. So, I think, actually, ACHD, you know, may improve our access on the lot. Regarding your comments for peak hours, we do do a greater percent of our business at lunch. It's quick traffic in and out. We have to -- you know, people do need to move their cars. Luckily -- well, I mean I'd love to do more dinner, but Bolo's peaks at dinner. We do not. So, I think in that aspect with fighting the Bolols traffic, I don't think that -- that we are going to create a problem. And, again, you know 70 percent of our customers are going to go through the drive-thru, freeing up the parking for the other uses. And, additionally, just as a side note, in each -- each time that Mr. Gibbs has come before you, he's pledged to work with Bolols to resolve some of that problem and I'm sure he's going to find a solution to that for Taco Bellis benefit, our benefit and KFC as well. Nichols: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nichols. Nichols: Mr. Jones, you said that ACHD has approved -- or found no congestion on the site. Can you tell me where that's at in their report? Jones: I was handed -- I was handed the documentation. It looks like page three of the required conditions for approval, letter P, based on development patterns in this area and the resulting traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system, ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 48 of 58 which I guess is the off-site system, will be adequate to accommodate the additional traffic generated by this proposed development. Nichols: Well, Mr. Jones, 11m going to differ with you. I think that has to do with the roads. Jones: Yeah. And that's what I said. Nichols: Not on your -- your inside -- inside your boundaries. So, I was just curious -- that's the only one I could find that dealt with traffic generation and then dealt with stuff that -- on the roads themselves and not internal to your site that I could see. Jones: Thank you for the clarification. De Weerd: Okay. Any other questions? Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. Jones, Mr. Atteberry had raised the concern -- and I don't think you have addressed that in your rebuttal -- about this parking and the access into your building. The front entrance faces the west and all of your parking for your customers -- well, not all, but a portion of your parking for your customers is on the south and the east sides, so, therefore, the people have to cross either through the drive-thru or through the parking lot to get all the way around the front of the building. What's your -- I guess what's your response on the safety issue he raised? Jones: My response would be, Madam President and Council Members, the -- and that's why we have proposed or we will designate for our employees to park on the east side in the parking stalls on the east and I would anticipate on each shift somewhere between four and six cars will park there. If we can cooperate with KFC, which, if you approve the project 11m sure we will reach an understanding and cooperation where they will park their employees in that same spot, that would alleviate people from -- in both restaurants, because right now if KFCls customers park there, they are walking across KFC's drive-thru in order to get to their -- in order to get to one of those stores. So, I don't anticipate that -- that too many guests are going to park on that side of the building. The -- once, again, on the south side we have pretty much designated that for KFC and committed -- and there is -- we will put the little fence to delineate KFC's customer currently use parking in that area and 11m sure they will continue to do that. I'm anticipating that our customers are going to park on the west side, which is close to the front entrance and I'm sure they will figure that out as well. De Weerd: Any questions? Bird: Madam President, I do have one question. De Weerd: Mr. Bird. ( \ Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 49 of 58 Bird: Mr. Jones, what are your hours? Jones: The hours are 7:00 in the morning until 11 :00, Sunday through Thursday, and, then, we open until midnight on Friday and Saturday. Bird: Okay. De Weerd: I guess my question is you have 27 and, then in cases, 30 feet between your area and the area separating Taco Bell and it looks like you need -- and is that wide enough for two lanes of traffic going through? Jones: Two lanes of traffic. I believe the requirement is 25 feet. De Weerd: Twenty-five. Who comes up with those? Bird: Madam President: De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Yeah. You've still got traffic coming out and if you got a small car -- but if you have a long wheel based pickup or something, in the first place, you're going to have a hard time getting through the drive-thru, But you do that anyway on all drive-thrus. You're going to have a hard -- you're going to have to turn quite a bit and you have got the other traffic coming down Taco Bell and I assure you I have been out to KFC and Taco Bell at all times of the day and their hours are basically I think about the same as yours. And it is congested out there. I have never been able to just drive right up and get to the window and get my food and get out of there. But it's going to be tight. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: And Mr. Jones can certainly comment if he wants, but, you know, I guess to me the issue on this portion is the fact that although the standard is 25 feet and this is 42 feet? Jones: All the way to the building. Nary: From the edge of the building. But 12 feet of that is taken up by a lane here where you have got traffic going west to east and, then, we are still -- I mean that is almost a two lane road. This is not one lane. This is people can turn left and right at the same -- one right after the other, they can come this direction and drive through this lot -- I mean there is no control here and if you have read the minutes the last time, that's one of the things we talked about that you haven't solved is forcing all the traffic one direction here and you can't -- you probably can't do that because when this was designed it was not designed with all of these businesses in mind. This is piece- ( (~ Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 50 of 58 mealing this in there, but there is not control here from this being three lanes of traffic, one for Taco Bell and two going this way and it's now 42 feet. It's not wide enough. Jones: Madam President, Mr. Nary, is the -- are you thinking that the primary concern is going to be the potential U-turn out of that or if I were to stipulate that there would be a left turn only coming out of the drive-thru, might that aid in your -- in the problems where we are avoiding the U-turn. Because there is enough room to -- Nary: But I guess, Mr. Jones, the problem I'm having is if you make this a left turn only, then you have got to cross traffic here going against each other trying to get out. Bird: And you got to cross traffic -- Nary: And, then, you have got this lane coming up here. If you funneled all the traffic this direction with a right in, right out, it certainly is better, but -- I mean I don't think you have solved all the problems, but I mean this -- this narrow lane here, with it being potentially three different lanes of traffic, if you have got a car here that decides to pull out -- here is the window, so they decide to pullout to come this way, you have got traffic going this way, you have got traffic in this lane here -- I mean it -- I mean it is a nightmare as is being presented by the other property owners. But this site has never been designed to deal with this and I guess I disagree with your one statement that you said M r. Gibbs has said every time he's been here that he'd work it 0 ut with Bolo's. Well, we have been here six times and I don't see it. So I don't really have to buy that yet. I don't see any working out anything. Alii see is a lot of parking that's being used up and not a lot of space for all these cars. Jones: Madam President, Mr. Nary, Members of the Council. Mr. Gibbs has always indicated that he -- that once we were determined what was going on with this location, he would pursue results with Bolo's, whether it be off-site parking or something and he hasn't done that as of yet, because he hasn't needed to or -- I guess I can address your traffic concerns in this way is that -- is that at the very most we are going to put one car at that -- at that right or left turn at the drive-thru exit at the most one a minute, which is -- which is not a lot of traffic. We can -- we can put a stop sign in any location to mitigate that if it were -- if it were required, but -- but there is not -- like I said, I wish I could put through 400 cars, but that won't happen, and I don't know that Taco Bell is at this point either, but one car a minute is not going to create a huge congestion traffic problem at that point. It's like a three way -- a three way stop or a three way intersection. De Weerd: I have a question. They said that -- is this where the window is for the Taco Bell? Jones: Yes. De Weerd: And so you have someone coming out here, let's say it's an SUV, a big one, and they are making that turning radius and you have traffic flows going, you know, this way and that way and you have a stack of cars sitting here, it just -- again -- and I guess we keep coming back to that -- is what kind of situation are we setting up and that's ( (- Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 51 of 58 been the primary concerns, by adding that -- that traffic coming out of the drive-thru, you're having two way traffic and then another drive-thru on the other side. It's just -- we see it as a disaster waiting to happen and even if it's one car a minute, you know, there is one disaster a minute waiting to happen. And, you know, that's dramatic, but I guess that's our concern -- or that's my concern. Jones: Again, Madam President, I appreciate the concern and I have literally -- I have probably spent more time in that parking lot over the last course of the three months than I have in my own restaurants, which is probably a bad thing. But I don't see the congestion, especially in that particular drive aisle going back and forth. I think if we can remember that at least half the cars are going back to the KFC and, then, they are flowing through their drive-thru, coming out to the east side of Carl's and making that right turn. So, you don't have people going back and forth from 1 st -- excuse me, from Meridian Road to Main Street. I appreciate the concerns and we will do everything that we can, whether it's control the traffic with stop signs or left turn only or whatever we might need to do, but the car one a minute I don't believe is going to pose a problem. I hope I can convince you of that. Bird: Madam President? Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: Like I said, I have been out there quite a few times and I have seen -- I have seen Kentucky Fried people come through, turn, come out this way and go down Meridian Street. I have seen Taco Bell people come right around here. I1II tell you my favorite way is to come out this way from Kentucky Fried, but I got like this and go around and -- and go out that way from Taco Bell, but -- so we just donlt have enough property there to have three drive-thrus, I don't believe. I think you1re just -- and one a minute I realize isn't that bad, but you're shoving a lot of cars and we are not even taking into consideration the guy that's went in and ate his dinner at one of the three places and goes out and gets in his car and is backing out into the driveway or getting out himself. So, we are not just looking at the drive-thru people, as far as I'm concerned, but I just donlt think -- I mean we are not talking about a 20 acre piece that we can put this on. I donlt know what the total acreage there is, but it's a long ways from 20 acres, I believe. I just think -- I just think we are asking for some real congestion out there. And don't get me wrong. I'd love to have a Carl's Junior in here. lid love it. I just -- I just donlt know how we can justify another drive-thru on that property. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. Jones, another thing. I guess we have asked the question about the location of our exit of your drive-thru and it sounds from what 11m hearing that it's directly across from the window for Taco Bell, is that right? ( ( Meridian City Council November 18. 2003 Page 52 of 58 Jones: I can't answer that exactly. It's very close it looks like. Nary: So, what were you going to do about the light spillage right into their window? Jones: Hadn't anticipated that problem. You know, to -- you know, probably to help in the delineation of the double access d rive aisle f rom the -- f rom the Taco Bell drive aisle, we can have some sort of a curbing and I would imagine that at the drive-thru window or in front on -- no, I don't think I can do it, because it's -- it's on a different parcel. I was going to suggest that we have some sort of a -- either a landscape median or a little wall on top of the -- you know, some sort of a little pony wall kind of a thing that might solve the problem. Nary: Well, Mr. Jones, you1re going to lose another foot or two in doing that and in trying to have a curb with a fence to shield the lights, but I mean I guess I'm a little surprised that your architect would design a drive-thru that spills light directly right into the face of the people that are standing right here. I don't know. I didn't hear the Taco Bell person really emphasize that, but if I'm the person working at that window, I don't want those headlights in my face all night long and there is no practical way to shield that in that particular location, but that -- I mean that, to me, is -- I guess we haven't addressed it very much and I appreciate you trying to, but I don't see how location-wise you can even have that exit in that spot. Jones: We could, actually, solve Mrs. de Weerd's problems with it perhaps and move the drive-thru -- continue that and remove those two parking stalls and have it exit just a bit -- a bit further back towards the west. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Mr. Jones, I mean this is a scale drawing, right? So, if you do that then you have got to redraw the building because the building is going to be over here. There is no way to -- I mean it's got to exit somewhere out here in these two spaces. There is no building here. Jones: That would be -- excuse me for interrupting you, but that would just be an additional drive lane exit so we won't need to move the building. Nary: I see. So, you're going to have your window here, but you're going to have the exit -- the lane go all the way over to here? Jones: Exactly. That may address your problem. De Weerd: Any further questions? Thank you. Jones: Thank you. ( Meridian City Council November 18,2003 Page 53 of 58 De Weerd: Okay. Council, any questions for staff or anything further before we close the Public Hearing? Okay. I would entertain a motion if you're so inclined. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we close Public Hearing CUP 03-042, the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Carl's Junior Restaurant with drive-thru service window by Clayton Jones. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to continue -- I'm sorry, to close the Public Hearing CUP 03-042. All those in favor say aye. Okay. All ayes. Motion carnes. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Discussion? Motion? Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: As much as I'd like to see Carl's in there and they went back and redesigned the building -- the message that I thought was -- we had sent was bring in something that doesn't have a drive-thru. You're just asking for too much traffic flow and even if it's one a minute out of each three places. That's three cars a minute, plus we don't know how many people are going to be pulling in to go in to sit down in the three restaurants that are right there, excluding Bolo's. I just -- I just don't know on that confined area how we can get another drive-thru through there and, like I said, lid love to have a Carl's Junior down that close to town. But I just -- and if he's depending on 58 percent of his business to be drive-thru, then, he's got to have a drive-thru. We had told Mr. Gibbs or suggested to him that we -- you know, we had nothing wrong with a restaurant if it's a sit down restaurant, where they come in, park, and went in and sat down. So, that's my theory on it. I just think it's too congested to have a third drive-thru. Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: Yeah. I seem to recall, too, Mr. Bird, in that discussion with Mr. Gibbs about that, it wasn't a discussion about I1II try to make this compatible, like Council President de Weerd said, I'll try to find a restaurant that's compatible with the uses, it's more if I can get a bigger restaurant and more spaces in this than what you want, so approve my drive-thru or it will be worse than what you thought. So, it wasn't an attempt to try to be conciliatory or try to find some reasonable way to make this fit. This is project from day ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 54 of 58 one should have been done as one development with the designs being done all together with Bolo's, with Taco Bell, with KFC, with Carl's Junior and this shows the lack of that foresight as to why it's a problem. They wouldn't be here six times if that had been done and it wasn't and no matter how many times they try to redesign that building and turn it in a different way, it's just not going to fit. It just isn't going to work with what they'd like to use it for. I agree with you, I'd love to see a Carl's Junior somewhere in this area, somewhere in the downtown area, somewhere -- there is lot of other places around not far from here that probably could support this, but this lot -- that site should be part of the parking lot. That's what it should be. That's when I was at Planning and Zoning -- that's what we wanted it to be because that's why we moved the drive-thru off of it, because it doesn't work. Itls already congested now with the parking. What they need to do is instead of worrying about trying to arrange something with Bolols is make that into parking, so the people at Bolo's have a place to park. But this just isn't going to work and I donlt know -- I think the reason we have never said to the staff no more drive-thru of any kind is because we really can't. If they can figure out a way to make it work, fine. They can keep trying all the time, but I don't see this one any better than the last, it's just different, it's better in some respects, but it just doesn't resolve things, because of the way it's being presented is a piecemeal type of development. It doesn't work. De Weerd: I guess I would echo the comments already made. I do think it's better -- it is much better in many ways, but that movement in between Carl's Junior and Taco Bell is too much. There is turning movements, there is three different directions of traffic and it's too much to put in that small piece -- small place, especially when the peak hours all happen at the same time. You know, these are all similar type of businesses and it has nothing to d 0 with competition. That doesn't b ear a ny weight in my concerns a t a II, other than you're putting people at high densities at the same time. If this was a different type of business, with different peak hours, it would be a lot more compatible in. the sense of the traffic generation and that's my concern. You have a turn movement, you have -- and three other -- there is just too much movement going on between there. I think that's a big safety issue for that area and to make a decision to add to that safety issue is not something I -- I think is our responsibility to look at the safety factors on these kind of applications and it would not be an asset to our community. McCandless: Madam President? De Weerd: Mrs. McCandless. McCandless: It looks like we are pretty unanimous in our feelings. I agree with everything that's been said. I would like to compliment them for their attempt to make it better. I just don't think it can be better. It's too small of an area for three drive-ins. Nichols: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nichols. Nichols: Madam President, Members of the Council, just a reminder that if you deny an application or deny a permit like this one, you Ire generally obligated to tell the applicant ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 55 of 58 what, if anything -- and I emphasize the if anything they could do to get this approved. I think one of the reasons the staff has done what they have done to try to work with the applicant on the drive-thru is a belief that perhaps there is some configuration that hadn1t been seen before that might have solved the issues. I would ask that when you address this application, if it's a motion to deny, that you address whether you think a drive-thru could ever be approved here and -- so that at least that issue is -- and maybe we are presuming too much, that there is some magic bullet, but this is the third try now and the applicant has spent a fair amount of money with architects to design these plans and so if you donlt think that a drive-thru could be worked after having seen three different iterations of it, I ask you to say so and -- based upon what's already in the record. De Weerd: Well, I can't make a motion, so -- McCandless: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. McCandless. McCandless: I move that we deny CUP 03-042, request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Carl's Junior restaurant and drive-thru service window by Clayton Jones, north of intersection of South Meridian Road, East Central Drive, and South Main Street, and my reason for making this motion is that I don't think there is room, no matter how they design it, to put another drive-in in that space and IIII make that motion and ask that the attorney draw up the proper papers. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay. Any discussion? Nary: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Nary. Nary: I guess I would ask the maker of the motion if we could include, I think, some language regarding congestion. I think that was done previously. I think that was the intent. But also that pursuant to Mr. Nichols' suggestion as to what can be done, I guess some specific language in the findings, based on both what Council President de Weerd has said, as well as your motion of the fact that there is not adequate or the type of facility that needs to be there has to be compatible and compatibility I think would be measured by the type of service being provided, the compatibility with the hours of operation and the types of service on this site versus the other companion sites on this piece of property, so there is not an overlap of use at the same time and I think after three attempts, I don't know what configuration may be compatible as a drive-thru, but I guess at this juncture in the findings lid ask Mr. Nichols to indicate from the Council that we canlt see -- foresee any other type of compatible -- in that location compatible drive- thru configuration, unless it was radically different than the three that we have already seen and that certainly leaves the door open. If someone can think of something else, but I'd like the staff at least to have something to hang their hat on to say that's not Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 56 of 58 different, you know, turning the building another 90 degrees isn't going to make it different. But if the maker of the motion was in agreement with that, I think that might help Mr. Nichols in formulating the findings. McCandless: I agree. Nary: And I would concur. De Weerd: Okay. Any further discussion? Nary: Madam President? Mr. Nichols, is that enough information do you think or do you need -- Nichols: Madam President, Members of the Council, I think that's adequate. De Weerd: Okay. If there is no further discussion -- ready for the question? McCandless: Question. De Weerd: Okay. It's been -- the motion on the table is to deny the request for a Conditional Use Permit for CUP 03-042 and with the stated reasons for denial and ask the attorney to draw up Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and Decision of Order. Mr. Clerk, will you call roll? Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 13. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: De Weerd: Okay. Item No 13 is water, sewer or trash delinquency. This is to inform you in writing, if you so choose that you have the right to a pre-termination hearing at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, November 18th, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this city that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. Your service will be discontinued on December 3rd, 2003, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer, and trash delinquency? Okay. They are hereby informed that they may appeal and have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $66,423.83. Council, do you have any questions? Hopefully, you're not on here. Hopefully, 11m not on here. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. / . ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 57 of 58 Bird: I would move that we approve the turn-off list in the amount of $66,423.83 and that date is December 3rd, 2003, unless payment is received in full. Nary: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to approve the delinquency list. Mr. Berg, please, call roll. Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 14. Executive Session: De Weerd: Thank you. We did add an item to our agenda. Fourteen is to adjourn into executive session per Idaho Code 67 -2345( 1 )(b). I would entertain a motion. Mr. Bird: Madam President? De Weerd: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move we go into executive session as per 67-2345(1 )(b) per Idaho state code. McCandless: Second. De Weerd: Okay. It's been moved and seconded to adjourn into executive session. All those in favor say aye. Nary: Roll call. De Weerd: Oh. 11m sorry. Roll call. Roll-Call: McCandless, yea; Nary, yea; de Weerd, yea; Bird, yea. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. De Weerd: Mr. Wardle, you are free to join us. Mr. Nichols. (Enter into Executive Session) (Return from Executive Session) De Weerd: Okay we'll come out of Executive Session. It's 10:45. I would entertain a motion to come out of Executive Session. Nary: So moved. Bird: Second. ( Meridian City Council November 18, 2003 Page 58 of 58 De Weerd: All those in favor. All ayes motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES De Weerd: I did want to make note that Will is working on a reception after the swearing in. He has instructed his staff not to put any items on new business so that it can be whatever we need to take care of with old business. Then we can allow the new members to kind of basque in their newly elected before they get kicked right. I did talk to the Mayor today about a reception for him so I will talk with Will about that tomorrow. It will be set Monday the 5th from 4-6 and the Mayor will - of January yes. We'll start working on that as well. Is there anything else anyone would like to bring up? Bird: Yes I would like to adjourn. De Weerd: Okay do I have a second. Nary: Second. De Weerd: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. All ayes. AdJournment 10:47. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:47 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: <- ROBER D. CORRIE, MAYOR 1/6 /0.:1- DATE ATTESTED: d~~ ( ( November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 ITEM NO. 3-G REQUEST Approve / Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plan Headworks Expansion Project: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Memo / Bid Results ~ {AfP VO Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Me To: Brad Watson From: Lenard Grady 01 (J ~,. cc: Gary Smith Date: 11/13/2003 ~D Ii-;' 1r--J -- .,~ ti ~ N ~.1,.' A r I:'; 'A ~"'iJ, '---. ',( -r .JiL_ --~U JL~.} /!i I I M ~ If I",~ ~ ," ~ . "'~~..i, J.. ':!f_L'j _L..<r' NOV 1 3 2003 C>i t.";r (-lf~' 'il ,"'- _ " . ~. ."{. :...' ~ j.Vl\-..~rldi '::q" lJlt\l ( ~lerk- .. Off'--l..-i.-"-~. v '--- "_ -Ice Re: Proposed Agenda Items for November 18, 2003 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the November 18 City Council consent agenda: * Headworks Expansion Proiect Four bids were received for this project as summarized below: . Contractors Northwest Performance Systems International Guho Corporation The Ewing Company $892,046.00 $961,900.00 $1,002,800.00 $1,007,800.00 . . . This project will expand the headworks and is scheduled to last 300 days. Contractors Northwest is the apparent low bidder. The bid tabulation is attached. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $892,046.00 contract with Contractors Northwest, Inc for The Headworks Expansion Project and authorize the Mayor to sign it. DAFT Chanae Order #3 This project is being constructed by The Ewing Company and is nearing completion. The attached change order includes the following: . Installation of a 2" potable water line to the Mechanical Building Installation of a Pressure Gauge on the DAFT I nstallation of WAS seal water station Installation of RASNV AS piping to allow greater flexibility and redundancy From the desk of. . . . . . Lenard Grady Staff Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 . Page 1 (208) 898-5500 Fax: (208) 887-1297 gradyl@meridiancity.org The total for Change Order #3 is $9,705.96 bringing the contract total to $845,997.82. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $9,705.96 Change Order #3 with The Ewing Company and authorize the Mayor to sign it. The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. Approval of this amendment, for $26,744.00, will allow completion of the Manual and develop safety procedures completing this project. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $26,744.00 with HDR for The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual Contractors Northwest and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Vulnerability Assessment Praisct - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. This project is required by EPA to be complete by July of 2004. Approval of this amendment, for $42,000, will allow completion of a complete site assessment, evaluation of the security of our SCADA system, and the final report to EPA. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $42,000.00 with HDR for The Vulnerability Assessment Project and allow the Mayor to sign it. License Aareement with NMID to Cross Ten Mile, Eiaht Mile, Nine Mile and Ridenbauqh Attached is an agreement with NMID to cross the above canals with our 12" water main on Victory Road. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve License Agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District to cross Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile and Ridenbaugh and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items. . Page 2 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 o 0 0.0 0 0...00 CO CO c: ~ L{) C'\f ~ N .Q _ 0; ~ I"- g 10.$ ~ ~ 69- f;fl- U7 (A- OCT 00 0000 000 0 o 0 u1 -q: ..q: ..c O..-NC'\I ::::J 0 (9 ~... ~ 0) Q) U ~&7U7~69- 00 0000 0 c: 0000 0 o 0000 c:i ~ 0000 0 C qr.nL!)O) q 2 ~ ~"'~"'L()'" ill C_O> 0) - co en- E ~ Efl- U7 69- (;I)- tt7 0) ~ C/) Q) u C co E ~ Q) Q) .~ a..0::b9-Efl-fi7Et7 0000 o LOL!)l.{') 00)""':0> 0..- N o ~ ..- m 0000 0 0000 0 0000 0 ~ OvvO co c: 0 v C'\I C\I co co ......... - ,..: E g~[ON 0 ooom ::- o (5 U7 f;t7 f;fl- (;I)- Ef7 Ol~ c: .- Ovcoo ~ ~~~~ Q) 8~~8 ~Q)~ ~ .~ g 0:b9-f:A-b9-EA- 0000 0 0000 0 cD ci 0 ci cD ~ ~8~~ g ~ <D 0 cO 0) C\I'" t_~C't)L{) ~ o co 2(5 en ~ f:A- 6'7 iT) ~ Ef7 o t) ~ 1: o o 0000 001"-0 <cioa:ir--.: vC't)~~ l!) 0) eO .Q ~ O::f;I7tt7tt7E17 2 N C\I C\I .- (j) I- I- I- 5-JU.u..LL ~ ;::; 000 fi5-r- g g 0 ::J -r-('i')C'\I a lo... 'co V> a. ..:::t!:. Q) o n:: Q) :: lo... 1D "'0 co U Co rot CLl Q) 0 0 Q) :r:~oo:: <(~C\J('i') ~<(<(<( ~ u-5 u1 t.ri 00 0000 a u-5 cv-5 ~ C":i I- ~ ~ ~ ~ )~ ~ ~~ \1 ~ '- ~ L..; ~ ~ \ . ~~ ~ ~~ "-, 1~ ~~ ~~ ~~ .. .. ....0) o t: 0)._ .~ s::: o CI) .... c. a.. 0 -c .- OJ &\ , J ~. ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~, ~ ; \ '\ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-.. "- ~ \J ~\ ( ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~'- t~ ~ ~{ ~\\ \3 ~ ~\ ~ ~. ~ { ~ ~ \ \ \ ~' ~ ~ ~ "'- "- ~ ~ ( ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ... >--0 " "'C.......... en=tJ ..... (1) -(1) Q) Q)"TJ E Q) C "'C i s:: .c ..... Q) ::::J "'C en.!::: ::s.!::: 0 Q.t>> U .- ::::J -c::l e [Q 0.- ca ..10- ....CIJ ..... Co- <( o..oes :( ~ Q) Q) Q) 00:: -co:: -c ca" "C ......... "'C.... [Q tn (1) C u- <(:::.. 0..... 0 ca"'-'" c...! 0:1 s... ..... 00. -c C ... E 0 0..0 ai u ~ .c <.J ::I tJ) ~l ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ lS\ ~' ~ \' ~\ ~ ~. ~ ""- '-. "'"- ~ &\ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ J\ i\ ~"'C "C -c~ en~ .... (1)"'C e" C -(1) (1) ::::J ... C .c .....(1) ~ [01 u tn.!::: ::1._ 0 .- ::::J -C::::J E [Q 0.- ca ..Ie- Co- ...(/) ..... <( a..oes :( ~ Q) Q) (1) 00:: "0:: -c CU-C " ......... -c..... OJ tJJ Q) C u- <(:::.. 0..... 0 ca"'-'" o...! m s.. ..... 00. -c C '- E 0 0..0 OJ u .c () :::s en ( November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 3-D ITEM NO. REQUEST Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMP A MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Memo / Easement ~ CA1F Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( lR 171 ., ~ ~Jr1.1 17v 1~-1~ ~r.i~~4 ~.'_. - -----~ ~ 'I ;; 'l/~ H' fJ '\~ ..-Jj~ ,.~~, '(1, ff1, if ~ -. - <" .~ Jl._~fJ NOV 1 3 2003 Ci t~r Of 1\IT ", c'.,~ f' Lel1diEU""1 Jlt~y Clerk Office- To: Mayor Corrie & City Council From: Brad Watson, P. E. CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk Date: 11/12/2003 Re: Proposed Agenda Items for November 18th City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the November 18th City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration: 1) Water Main Easement for Vallev Life Community Church. Typical water main easement Recommended Council Action: Approve the Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church and authorize the Mayor to, sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. . Page 1 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of _, 20_between ., the parties of the first part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently C9nnect to said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement of ~ water main over and across the -following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXIllBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto, repair and replacement at the cOnvenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HA VB AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after construction, making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to the water line, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such construction, repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies "within such bOl:ffidary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no finther effect and shall be completely relinquished. Water Main Easement EASMT WTR THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: A ~ s~r~t:; STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) On this 4":h... day of ~uob.- , 2(0'), before me, th<ilIDderSigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared T~ j.r!.A:t:Sn1~ ~ ~ ~ m;Q--~.:r( A.J Im4I ., known or identified to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively~ of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNES S WHERE 0 F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. (SEAL) ",,~\\\mnn Iff//llll/t ~,~ p~")o.. ~/... ~r d\'"': .... . . . I J:::: ........~.7'~ ~ ......"'t:. · · ." /-...) .;..-:, ,~ ^,'C~. .. 4'tfi ~~ ~ 'V... ..\.1 ~ ~ .. -..'\ 0 T A If 1" .~ ~ ~ l ~ .. ~ 5 : ---.. . AlII..- : ~ S~ ~ ~ :*s :;; 'JI{.-: ^ ~... ~ ~ ..... r-'US'L \" : ~ ~ .d\.fl. ".0 ~ ~_v~.. ..:~ ~ T~~~j:;;....~.~~'~~ ""Z'~ ~ OF ~v ~ ~bll/llUftll\\\\\\\~ Water Main Easement EASMT WTR ( GRANTEE: CITY OF 1vIERIDIAN Robert D. Corrie, Mayor Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk Approved By City Council On: STATE OF IDAHO, ) : S8. County of Ada ) On this day of ~ 2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and CitY Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. -----... / (SEAL) NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO Residing at: . Commission Expires: Water Main Easement EASMT WTR IDAHO SURVEY G"ROUP 70 I S. Allen .St., Su ite I' 05 Meridian,ldaho83642 Phone. (~08) H~6'-8570 . Fax (208) 17B~03~9 Project No. 03-249 November 6, 2003 DESCRIPTION FOR WATER LINE EASEMENT VALLEY LIFE CHURCH A 20.00-foot wide water 'Iine easem'ent being 10.00 feet to the right and 10.00 feet to the left of the following described centerline located in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 30, T.4N., R.1 E., S.M., Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NE corner of said Section 30 from which N1/16 corner of said Section 30 bears South 00037'40" West, 1328.36 feet; thence along the East boundary line of said Section 30 South 00037'40" West, 547.15 feet; thence leaving said East boundary line North 90000.00" West, 28.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING of said easement centerline; thence 10.00 feet to the right and 10.00 feet to the left of the following described centerline: continuing North 90000'00" West, 10.00 feet; thence North 00037'40" East, 29.88 feet; thence South 00037'40" West, 29.88 feet; thence North 90000'00" West, 124.51 feet; thence North 00000'00" East, 34.88 feet; thence South 00000'00" West, 34.88 feet; thence North 90000'00" West, 29.28 feet; thence South 00037'36" West, 127.52 feet; S:\lSG Projects\Valley Life Church Staking (03-249)\Documents\WATERLINEease-des.doc /" \ thence North 89022'24" West, 53.03 feet; thence North 00000'00" East, 31.73 feet to the terminus of said easement centerline. Prepared by: Idaho Survey Grou Gregory G. Carter, P.L.S. S:\ISG Projects\Valley Life Church Staking (03-249)\Documents\WATERLINEease-des.doc f f ( ! i ~ ! 1 E' l J I f f I ~+c ~ r ----- -- - - ------ - ----1 I . f N_ oo-og*oo. _ ~ : I 31. 7S ! I 1 1 i Iz r----------J I I I I I (J) : : e ~ : I 01....., I ! ~I~ ! I I I : l~: i I L__________________________________________________________----I : , · 7'36" W : : L s OO~____________, , : ----------,-27.52' I i I I 1 L_______________________________________________________---------1 I~! I ICD I ! I. L------------1 : I N oow.oo. E-J : r-34:SB'- : I I I I I t\) ! I r------------J q I I ~ :, 1 : 0: : I'T1 I 1 ~ II 1 : ;;:f 1 I ;:0 I II ! .....: : z: I ~ i =1- ! ~ ! ~l'~ j ~ : 0" : -I\L!;1 ! : I : .. I 1 I ! I I I I I I . I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I : I : I I 1 : L_________, I I t I 1 ! _~Q.37.49~ ! PI 29.88* ! I 0 1 L__<:' z-------------J CD ~~ 8d .q ~ 54~1~ o 781.2)' ~ ___________ @----.}------n------S-0D-37'40;;-W"1328:j6~;mRlINE ~OCUST GROVE RD U1 BASIS OF BEARING N to G)C/)- ;oeO o;o~ c<o -em .. -< 1] () ~~~E CD;o-jO ~omm q;;;C:~ ~_z 0)0- ~o rri o?f ~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ ;0 tv en :-f ~ t--t )> t--t "1J l::tj Q 0 ~ ;:0 ~ ~ -< (f) 0 t--to rrt Z ~ " (') 0 ~ ~ " ~ fT1 )> 0 ;0 0 Z --I )> I 0 tH rTJ 2 >(1) (') p ZX 0 Z J: I'\JC~ III :EOJ OZ~~ ~ )>- o~z"- -1-1 tH ..-<.; .p... ~ fT1 " -;:0 0 UJ ::0 0 o. ~c;o )>... " :r:fT1 --I ~~ o - I CD fT1 ~'~ ~ z (f) .; rr1 fT1 ~ ~ "- fT1 Z .p.. --I 0 ~ " ~ U1 tn Ul o CD ton (J) I'\) I'\) CD 0 November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 ITEM NO. 3 -[ REQUEST Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Memo / Easement ~vJ/ #vpr Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. City of Meridian Public Works Dept. Memo To: Mayor Corrie & City Council I..'.r'} R.' >I' 1t "1 It ~! ~L"" t 1~0 <"If "if ~7 "'-~"",,'~ ---'" H ~ ~ l ~_Jj" ~ :'r-~ Jt~'j "~~__ ti ~l~!-"~i. M,JN From: Brad Watson, P.E. CC: File, Gary Smith, PE, City Clerk Date: 11/13/2003 NOV 1 ~~ 2003 l"" · '. ". '-'. " f\ / .' . :~: t,y ;/1 .l vlel"ldl ~iI.\ t.'rty ~.."l(.::rk Office Re: Proposed Agenda Items for November 18th City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests that the following items be placed on the November 18th City Council agenda, on the Consent Agenda, for Council's consideration: 1) Water Main Easement for St Luke's Helipad & Crew Quarters. Typical water main easement This easement will replace a previously approved version. This easement will allow for the hydrant to be placed and serviced without damage to their drain field. Recommended Council Action: Approve the Water Main Easement, as revised, for 5t Luke's Hospital and authorize the Mayor to sign and City Clerk to attest. Thank you for your consideration. . Page 1 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this _ day of _, 20_between , the parties of the frrst part, and hereinafter called the Grantors, and the City ofl\1eridian, Ada County, Idaho, the party of the second part, and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water mam is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others; and \VHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain, service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement of a water main over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, additional connection thereto, repair and replacement at the"convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. "IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after construction, making repairs, performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to the water line, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such construction, repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundari.es of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or whIch is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant \Vith the Grantee that they ar~ lawfully seized and possessed Water Main Easement Page 1 EAS"MT WTR of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the fust part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year fITst herein above written. Secretary STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) On this if day of )JrN~ , 20196, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared I- f H ~ and , known or identified to me to be the . ~ Sccrcrmy, respectively, of the corporation that executed the within instrument, an &0 ledged to me that such corporation executed the same. "", II """"'1: IN.~~~StrUir."h. POF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year ,-. .......~~~ ~t a e Writt~ ~ ~ T ~ : · ~O .4J! t.... : :: or,: : * : . ...... · * 5 . . . . . \. (fl.\ /)lTBL\C I i NOTARY PUBLIC FOR IDAHO ~ ;;>.... .. 0 ~ 12. _ : A. 1\ ~~ .", 1'. ............~~ ~..:- Residing at ~ ~###.. ~ OF \'0 r;...fi OJ 11L- ......fllI'I.C- ............... Commission Expires: - - - -0 .. I is .1 dC..)f';IO GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert D. Corrie, Mayor Attest by William G. Berg, City Clerk Approved By City Council OJ).: Water Main Easement Page 2 WTR EASMT Roylance & Associates P .A. 391 W. State Street, Suite E, Eagle, Idaho 83616 Engineers . Surveyors. Landplanners Telephone (208) 939-2824 Fax (208) 939-2855 Exhibit A October 27, 2003 Project No. 2369 Legal Description St. Luke's Meridian Medical Center Water Main Easement 2,013 Square Feet A 20-foot Water Main Easement situated in the Northwest One Quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: . Commencing at a found 5/8-inch steel pin monumenting the most South.easterly Corner of Parcel 8 as depicted on a Parcel Boundary Adjustment Survey recorded as Record of Survey No. 5306 and filed as Instrument No. 101017141, records of Ada County. Thence following the easterly property line of said Parcel 8 North 00000'42" West a distance of 63.37 feet to the POlNT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said easterly property line North 90000'00" West a distance of 31.91 feet to a point; Thence Nort~ 45000'00" West a distance of 43.01 feet to a point; Thence North 00000'00" East a distance of 42.29 feet to a point; Thence North 90000'00" East a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; ,Thence South 00000'00" East a distance of 34.01 feet to a point; Thence South 45000'00" East a distance of 26.45 feet to a point; Thence North 90000'00" East a distance of 23.62 feet to a point on the easterly property line of said Parcel 8; Thence following said easterly property line South 00000'42" East a distance of 20.00 feet to the POlNT OF BEGINNING. The above tract of land contains 2,013 square feet, more or less, subject to all existing easements and rights-of-way. Prepared By: ROYLANCE & ASSOCIATES P.A. ;391 W. STATE STREET, SUITE E EAGLE, IDAHO 83616 208-939-2824 208-939-2855 (FAX) ST. LUKE'S MERIDIAN MEDICAL CENTER SITUATED IN A PORTION OF IHE NW1/4 OF SECTION 16, T3N, R1E'I SM, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO I I I I ~ I I I I 3: I I I . I $: I I I I ?: I I I I 3= ~ I I'\J 0 I '" 0 d "-- - - -w-- o--e---; 0.. I O..Jll.. .. ~ : I I'T1 3: I I I I ;: I I zz I DO I m 00 VI cS cS 3= tH qq I '-J ..Jll.. 0 I .. t\.) 0 z z --M----M___ ==~ I -M----M-___M_ I - --J N90.0Q'QQ"E I - 20.00' - l I I I 1 wi I 01.. w O<t- 01.. :c 81 ~ om. rt) 01 ~ I 01 ON 0 81v I (1)1 zl I I I I \ I ~ ".s''ll': \. " t~a " " . ~~..~~ " " " ~" N90.0Q'QO"E " ~~ ~" "-- - - - - ~ bo" 23.62' ~~d- ~o~ " 7" " ~ " " " "-- _ N90.00'OO"W _ 31.91 ' POINT OF BEGINNING FOUND 5/8" STEEL PIN BEING THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 8. RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 5306, INSTRUMENT~ NO. 101017141. RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY. - - ,EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER MAIN EASEMENT f!. 10 o 20 I' , , , , 1, , , , , , , , , , , I SCALE IN FEET VICNTY MAP NTS o < o a:: ~ I~ EASEMENT LOCA TlON L..EGEtD - - - - - - - - WATER LINE EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE () RECORD INFORMA TlON PER INSTRUMUNT NO. 101017141 ROYLANCE AND ASSOCIATES PA Engineers Surveyors Landplanners 391 W State Street Suite E Eagle Idaho 83616 Phone (208) 939-2824 Fax (208) 939-2855 ( November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 ITEM NO. ,9y ~ F REQUEST Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 -- The Ewing Company: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Memo / Change Order ~ to/( Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Me l-~ ~r;,,~ -~~" >>Lf k It ~ Li T "~- Y-1i~~ "<",,-~ ,--,'~>~ ~V-tL!<< ~ M '1 M \;v ~. ~ ~ b -"-' "<-./ >~;.",,-<:l.j.< '" -[~i .l~."~}! Nav 1 3 2D03 To: Brad Watson From: Lenard Grady 01 (J. ..Q... cc: Gary Smith Date: 11/13/2003 ;=;ft~: g~~~tJ:~~~~;(~, Re: Proposed Agenda Items for November 18, 2003 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the November 18 City Council consent agenda: Headworks Expansion Proiect Four bids were received for this project as summarized below: . Contractors Northwest Performance Systems International Guho Corporation The Ewing Company $892,046.00 $961 ,900.00 $1,002,800.00 $1,007,800.00 . . . This project will expand the headworks and is scheduled to last 300 days. Contractors Northwest is the apparent low bidder. The bid tabulation is attached. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $892,046.00 contract with Contractors Northwest, Inc for The Headworks Expansion Project and authorize the Mayor to sign it. ~ DAFT Chanae Order #3 This project is being constructed by The Ewing Company and is nearing completion. The attached change order includes the following: Installation of a 2" potable water line to the Mechanical Building Installation of a Pressure Gauge on the DAFT Installation of WAS seal water station Installation of RAS/WAS piping to allow greater flexibility and redundancy . . . From the desk of. . . . Lenard Grady Staff Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 . Page 1 (208) 898-5500 Fax: (208) 887-1297 gradyl@meridiancity.org The total for Change Order #3 is $9,705.96 bringing the contract total to $845,997.82. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $9,705.96 Change Order #3 with The Ewing Company and authorize the Mayor to sign it. The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. Approval of this amendment, for $26,744.00, will allow completion of the Manual and develop safety procedures completing this project. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $26,744.00 with HDR for The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual Contractors Northwest and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Vulnerability Assessment Proiee! - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. This project is required by EPA to be complete by July of 2004. Approval of this amendment, for $42,000, will allow completion of a complete site assessment, evaluation of the security of our SCADA system, and the final report to EPA. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $42,000.00 with HDR for The Vulnerability Assessment Project and allow the Mayor to sign it. License AQreement with NMID to Cross Ten Mile, Eiaht Mile, Nine Mile and RidenbauQh Attached is an agreement with NMID to cross the above canals with our 12" water main on Victory Road. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve License Agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District to cross Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile and Ridenbaugh and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items. . Page 2 CHANGE ORDER NO.2 PROJECT City of Meridian WWTP~ Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener Proiect DATE OF ISSUANCE November 12~ 2003 EFFECTIVE DATE November 12~ 2003 OWNER City of Meridian CONTRACTOR Ewing Company ENGINEER Carollo Engineers Yon are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Description: 1. Revise RAS and WAS piping per the price quotation from Lacy Mechanical of 10/17/03. 2. InstaIl2-inch potable water line per the price quotation from Terra-West Inc. of 10/13/03. 3. Install Pressure Gauge on DAFT backpressure valve per price quote dated 10/21/03. 4. Install WAS seal water station and piping per price quotation from Lacy of 11/12/03. Reason for Change Order: Provide process redundancy, WAS pump seal water piping, and potable water to the ( mechanical building. Attachments: Price quotation letters: Ewing Company 10/17/03, Terra West Inc. 10/13/03, Ewing Company 10/21/03, Ewing Company 11/12/03. CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES: Original Contract Price Original Contract Times Substantial Completion: 270 Days - November 21. 2003 $ 809.500.00 Ready for final payment: 300 Days - December 26.2003 days or dates Net Changes from previous Change Orders No. -1L to No. -1 Net Changes from previous Change Orders No. ~ to No. -1 $ 26.791.86 7 Calendar Davs Days Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Times prior to this Change order Substantial Completion: 277 Davs - November 28. 2003 $ 836~291.86 Ready for final payment: 307 Davs - Januarv 3,2004 days or dates Net Increase (decrease of this Change Order) Net Increase (decrease of this Change Order) $ 9,705.96 0 days Contract Price wi~h all approved Change Orders Contract Times with all approved Change Orders $ 845.997.82 Substantial Completion: 277 Days - November 28,2003 Ready for final payment: 307 Davs - Januarv 3.2004 days or dates RECOMMENDED BY ENGINEER: ACCEPTED BY CONTRACTOR: William . By: By: Date: Contractor (Authorized Signature) Date: APPROVED BY OWNER: Robert D Corrie, Mayor Attest: William G. Berg, Ir., City Clerk Date: Date: November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 ITEM NO. 3-Gz REQUEST Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 -- HDR Engineering, Inc.: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Memo / Amendment Mf{)~ Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Mem ~ To: Brad Watson From: Lenard Grady 01 (j ~... cc: Gary Smith Date: 11/13/2003 NO. \/ i ""i; ~no~ . t' , J LU J ()f l\lcri di::~L J; (:jt,y (1 I(~'rk (ifri Ce Re: Proposed Agenda Items for November 18, 2003 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the November 18 City Council consent agenda: Headworks Expansion Proiect Four bids were received for this project as summarized below: . Contractors Northwest Performance Systems International Guho Corporation The Ewing Company $892,046.00 $961,900.00 $1 ,002,800.00 $1,007,800.00 . . . This project will expand the headworks and is scheduled to last 300 days. Contractors Northwest is the apparent low bidder. The bid tabulation is attached. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $892,046.00 contract with Contractors Northwest, Inc for The Headworks Expansion Project and authorize the Mayor to sign it. DAFT Chanae Order #3 This project is being constructed by The Ewing Company and is nearing completion. The attached change order includes the following: . Installation of a 2" potable water line to the Mechanical Building Installation of a Pressure Gauge on the DAFT Installation of WAS seal water station Installation of RAS/W AS piping to allow greater flexibility and redundancy From the desk of. . . . . . Lenard Grady Staff Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 . Page 1 (208) 898-5500 Fax: (208) 887-1297 gradyl@meridiancity.org The total for Change Order #3 is $9,705.96 bringing the contract total to $845,997.82. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $9,705.96 Change Order #3 with The Ewing Company and authorize the Mayor to sign it. ~ The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of ,,' this project. Approval of this amendment, for $26,744.00, will allow completion of the Manual and develop safety procedures completing this project. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $26,744.00 with HDR fo'r The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual Contractors Northwest and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Vulnerability Assessment Proiect - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. This project is required by EPA to be complete by July of 2004. Approval of this amendment, for $42,000, will allow completion of a complete site assessment, evaluation of the security of our SCADA system, and the final report to EPA. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $42,000.00 with HDR for The Vulnerability Assessment Project and allow the Mayor to sign it. License Aoreement with NMID to Cross Ten Mile. Eiaht Mile. Nine Mile and Ridenbauoh Attached is an agreement with NMID to cross the above canals with our 12" water main on Victory Road. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve License Agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District to cross Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile and Ridenbaugh and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items. . Page 2 ( AlVlENDMENT NO.1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREElVlENT between CITY OF MERIDIAN and HDR ENGINEERING, INC. for THE FACILITIES SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND SAFETY MANUAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT The agreement, made and entered into the 16th day of June, 2003, between the City of Meridian and the ENGINEER, HDR ENGINEERING, INC. is hereby amended on the _ day of , 2003 as set forth herein. WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, the City and the Engineer have entered into a contract for professional services for analysis and recommendations regarding the Vulnerability Assessment Project, herein referred to as the "Project"; WHEREAS, the City has agreed to have the Engineer provide the extra services as described in Scope of Services; WHEREAS, the original Scope .of Services will be amended by the attached Scope of Services, and the contract amount increased by $26,744 to a total contract amount of $91,262. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants of performance contained or incorporated herein, the City and the Engineer agree that the agreement entered into the 16th day of June, 2003, shall be amended as follows: Facilities Safety Assessmentand Safety Manual Development Project Amendment No. 1 Professional Services Agreement ( Section 1. Scope of Services The scope of services shall include the development of Health and Safety Procedures, each addressing a specific hazardous task or situation. The following Procedures will be addressed: · Permit Required Confined Space Entry · Ladder Safety · Slip, Trip, and Fall Protection · Electrical Safety · Excavation Safety · Hazard Communication · Lockout! Tagout · Bloodborne Pathogens · Traffic Safety · Personal Protective Equipment · Emergency Action Plan · Noise (Hearing Conservation) · Portable Fire Extinguishers · Heat Stress · Cold Stress · First Aid! CPR · Defensive Driving · Violence in the Workplace · Biological Hazards · Medical Monitoring · Powered Platforms, Manlifts, and Vehicle Mounted Wark Platforms · Chemical Hygiene Plan for Laboratories · Machinery and Machine Guarding · Welding, Cutting, and Brazing · Gantry Cranes · Powered Industrial Trucks · Motor Vehicles and Material Handling Equipment A draft list of proced~res shall be submitted to the Department for review and comment prior to initiating Procedure development. However, in order to facilitate development of the Health and Safety Program, Procedure development addressing known or obvious specific hazardous tasks or situations will be initiated prior to finalizing the list of procedures. In order to further facilitate the development of the Manual, a copy of each draft SectionlProcedure will be submitted bye-mail to the Department for review and comment upon completion, rather than waiting until all draft Procedures h~ve been Facilities Safety Assessmentand Safety Manual Development Project Amendment No. 1 Professional Services Agreement completed. A draft Health and Safety Program Manual, addressing the initial comments will be prepared and submitted, for final Department review and comment. Upon receipt of the final comments, the comments will be incorporated and 10 copies of the final Health and Safety Program Manual, along with an electronic copy on one or more CDs will be delivered to the Department. The electronic copy will be written in Microsoft Ward (latest version). Section 2. Compensation For services described in this Amendment, payment shall be made on the same basis as in the original Agreement. Direct Labor Costs used as a basis for payment shall be updated to current salary and wages paid to all Engineer's personnel engaged directly on the Project, including, but not limited to, engineers, architects, surveyors, designers, drafting personnel, specification writers, estimators, and other technical and business personnel; but does not include indirect payroll-related costs or fringe benefits. The City shall pay Engineer's direct expenses incurred in providing services, including the cost of sub consultants, on the same basis as in the original Agreement. The City's total consideration, including expen,ses, for services in Amendment No. 1 shall be $26,744, and the total Agreement shall be amended not to exceed $91,262. Payment for Additional Services: Compensation for additional services will be on the basis of a Lump Sum or Per Diem as agreed upon before the initiation of any such services. HDR will not perlorm any Additional Services activities without written authorization from the Public Works Department. Section 3. Schedule Draft Health and Safety Program Manual: Receive City Comments on Draft H&S Program Manual: Health and Safety Program Manual Completion: December 1, 2003 December 19, 2003 January 16, 2004. CITY OF 1vlERIDIAN HDR ENGINEERING, INC. Mayor A TIEST: William G. Berg, City Clerk Facilities Safety AssessJnentand Safety Manual Development Project Amendment No. 1 Professional Sen1ices AgreeJnent ( November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 3-H ITEM NO. REQUEST Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No. 1 -- HDR Engineering, Inc.: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Memo / Amendment rJ tAvf~ Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( Me ?:?l ,~ ~;-. ..... ~~r~1 ~T1:'" "?~''--....,.", ~...,._ q-q e ~ ~ g,~~ .~~ l~:,! .1t ~V ~[:fA ot~J J\l(JV 1 3 2003 To: Brad Watson From: Lenard Grady oR (} ~... cc: Gary Smith Date: 11/13/2003 ,~~~ ~! ~~/ () r 1\:1 t' J 1 d i[Ul !: ..It,~/ (;1f.~1"1{ <)ff1ce Re: Proposed Agenda Items for November 18, 2003 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the November 18 City Council consent agenda: Headworks Expansion Proiect Four bids were received for this project as summarized below: . Contractors Northwest Performance Systems International Guho Corporation The Ewing Company $892,046.00 $961,900.00 $1,002,800.00 $1 ,007,800.00 . . . This project will expand the headworks and is scheduled to last 300 days. Contractors Northwest is the apparent low bidder. The bid tabulation is attached. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $892,046.00 contract with Contractors Northwest, Inc for The Headworks Expansion Project and authorize the Mayor to sign it. DAFT Chanae Order #3 This project is being constructed by The Ewing Company and is nearing completion. The attached change order includes the following: . Installation of a 2" potable water line to the Mechanical Building Installation of a Pressure Gauge on the DAFT Installation of WAS seal water station Installation of RASIW AS piping to allow greater flexibility and redundancy From the desk of. . . . . . Lenard Grady Staff Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 . Page 1 (208) 898-5500 Fax: (208) 887-1297 gradyl@meridiancity.org The total for Change Order #3 is $9,705.96 bringing the contract total to $845,997.82. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $9,705.96 Change Order #3 with The Ewing Company and authorize the Mayor to sign it. * The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. Approval of this amendment, for $26,744.00, will allow completion of the Manual and develop safety procedures completing this project. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $26,744.00 with HDR for The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual Contractors Northwest and authorize the Mayor to sign it. -. Vulnerability Assessment Proieet - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. This project is required by EPA to be complete by July of 2004. Approval of this amendment, for $42,000, will allow completion of a complete site assessment, evaluation of the security of our SCADA system, and the final report to EPA. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $42,000.00 with HDR for The Vulnerability Assessment Project and allow the Mayor to sign it. License AQreement with NMID to Cross Ten Mile. Eiaht Mile. Nine Mile and Ridenbauah Attached is an agreement with NMID to cross the above canals with our 12" water main on Victory Road. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve License Agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District to cross Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile and Ridenbaugh and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items. . Page 2 AMENDMENT NO.1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT between CITY OF MERIDIAN and HDR ~NGINEERING, INC. for THE VULNERABILITY ASSESSl\1ENT PROJECT The agreement, made and entered into the 19th day of May, 2003, between the City of Meridian and the ENGINEER, HDR ENGINEERING, INC. is hereby amended on the _ day of , 2003 as set forth herein. WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, the City and the Engineer have entered into a contract for professional services for analysis and recommendations regarding the Vulnerability Assessment Project, herein referred to as the "Project"; WHEREAS, the City has agreed to have the Engineer provide the extra services as described in Scope of Services; WHEREAS, the original Scope of Services will be amended by the attached Scope of Services, and the contract amount increased by $42,000 to a total contract amount of $54,000. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants of performance contained or incorporated herein, the City and the Engineer agree that the agreement entered into the 19th day of May, 2003, shall be amended as follows: Section 1. Scope of Services Task 1.0. Definition of Water System Security Objectives, Background Data Collection, and Prioritization of Adverse Events The purpose of this task is to define water system security objectives, establish the security planning team and gather background information on Meridian's water infrastructure systems. HDR and the City will then prioritize facilities based on criticality. The following subtasks detail these activities. Sub task 1.1. Esta~lish Security Planning Team In a workshop session, HDR and City staff to develop project team consisting of HDR and City staff members. Subtask 1.2. Collect and Review Background Information The City will assist HDR in collecting background information to be used In the vulnerability assessment analysis. HDR will use this information as a reference. This information includes: Facility site plans. Existing security contracts. System and design capacities. Reports or records of previous security- related incidents. System performance reports. Crime demographics. Regulatory permits. Sources and quantities of normal water supply. Staff organization and employee job descriptions. Interconnects for alternative emergency water supply. or Communications system description or general specifications. Operational procedures and policies. Public access constraints or public relations requirements. Security policies and procedures. Public information protocols. Visitors policies and procedures. Facility long- and short-term expansion plans. Contractor policies and procedures. Existing emergency response plan. Neighboring area landscaping or architectural requirements. Types, quantItIes and characteristics of all hazardous substances stored at each site or facility. Interdepartmental agreements with emergency services (fire, emergency response, public health, fire, and law enforcement). Inter-agency agreements with other municipalities or owners of alternative water supply. Location map of water distribution system. System design performance. Applicable zoning codes and ordinances. eIP for security enhancements. SCADA servers and workstations. SCADA PLCS and RTUs. Network hubs, routers, switches, etc. Network and host-based firewalls. Network and host-based Intrusion Detection systems (N-IDS and H-IDS). Virtual Private Network (VPN) Servers. Authentication, Authorization and Audit (AAA) servers. Network Management/Monitoring Servers (NMS). Zoning- codes and ordinances as applicable. Subtask 1.3. Define Mission Objective Criteria and Critical Facilities HDR will review facilities and threat analysis goals, establish and refine the mission objective criteria, and establish goals for the prevention of a potential loss. Criticality can be measured in terms such as duration of service outage, cost of service outage, and character of service zones. In a workshop session using the RAM-W ranking worksheets, IIDR and City staff will rank mission objectives and facilities using the pairwise comparison technique. Subtask 1.4. Prioritization of Adverse Events Affecting the Water System and End Users Using the RAM-W ranking worksheets, City staff will rank facilities using weighted evaluation criteria and pairwise comparison. Task 1.0 Products HDR: Background information One copy of all ranking worksheets Melidian: Contact information for Security Planning Team Review comments on ranking worksheets Task 2.0. Evaluate Possible Methodologies of Malevolent Acts and Assessment of the Likelihood of Malevolent Acts HDR to contact local law enforcement, FBI, as well as operations superintendents at each facility and review reported crime data. In a workshop session, HDR and City staff to develop the design basis threat(s) (insider, outside and cyber) appropriate for each facility. IIDR and City Staff to develop a list of the most likely threat potentials. These threats may include vandalism, theft, disgruntled customer (outsider), disgruntled employee (insider), and terrorism. HDR to generally evaluate threats that could be system-wide or occur at random locations (such as verbal threats and/or contamination at random access points to system). Risk analysis of these will be limited to general observations/recommendations for response. HDR will summarize Design Basis Threat assessment for review and comment by City Staff. Tasks 2.0 Products HDR: Copy of crime data findings to IIDR RAM-W threat analysis worksheets Meridian: Written comments on threat analysis worksheets City of Meridian HDR Engineering, Inc. -4- Vulnerability Assessment Consulting Services Scope of Services 10/1612003 Task 3.0. Characterization of the Water System by Site, Assessment of Control System, and Assessment of Security Policies and Procedures By reviewing background information and the site assessment, IIDR will determine the interdependence on the critical infrastruct~re, such as electrical power, SCADA, piping systems, as well as the operating functions of the water system. In addition a vulnerability assessment of the control systems, and an assessment of Security Policies and Procedures will be penomed to support the Risk Evaluation task. Subtask 3.1. Site Characterization Based on background information previously collected by HDR, IIDR will develop a system block diagram for all critical facilities including interdependencies of other facilities and supply points. The diagrams will include barriers, major components (including large pieces of equipment, buildings, and storage units), and SCADA and communications system components. Subtask 3.2. Onsite Physical Assessment HDR will conduct the physical site assessment and will tour each critical facility as well as representative sub-critical facilities and review its operating components. Observations, discussions, and interviews will be recorded in written notes and digital photographs. The site assessment will include observation of the following items: Condition and serviceability. Software platform transparency Environmental conditions (light, humidity, Communication system noise, vibration, temperature, etc.) NAR (nuisance alarm rate) Suitability for intended use (deterrence, FAR (false alarm rate). detection, delay, response, mitigation.) Personnel entry and parking policies Hardware connectivity Chemical and equipment delivery policies Contractor security policies Hazardous materials handling Motor pool policies In addition to the above, other operations for the water department offices will also be reviewed. These operations will include: Handling of cash. Screening and movement of customers throughout the building Protection of employees with direct customer contact Building evacuation routes and emergency plans. Public parking location, access, controls. Existing security system effectiv~ness will be assessed in the field by the team. Any protection system judged to be lower than medium or high performance will be identified City of Meridian -5- Vulnerability Assessment HDR Engineering, Inc. Consulting Services 10/1612003 Scope of Services as vulnerability. This assessment will result in a ranking of which water facilities are most likely to be successfully attacked. Subcritical facilities will be assessed in the field for major vulnerabilities. Facilities such as small to mid-sized distribution pipelines, storage reservoirs and pumping stations, if considered noncritical, may be analyzed as typical systems. General recommendations will be made regarding the physical protection systems and operational systems associated with non-critical facilities. Subtask 3.3. Assessment of Vulnerability of Control System On-Site SCADA/Cyber Assessment HDRlWestin will conduct the SCADA/Cyber site assessmen~ using one Westin person, who will be a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP). Meridian to provide a representative for 8 hours who is familiar with the IT/SCADA/ Controls infrastructure as well as how the Control system integrates into the operation of each facility, particularly the SCADA system. Analysis is limited to one SCADA system (one make/model of SCADA software, one make/model of networked PLC and one make/model of radio) and one administrative network (one subnet). A subnet is a part of a larger network. Generally, networked devices or machines within the same sll;bnet will have IP addresses that begin with the same two or three numbers in the dotted fout number address scheme (dot delimited IP address). Administrative and SCADA system can be scanned from one location. A review of the system architectures and design will be performed. An interview will be conducted with Meridian personnel to capture any recent modifications. Particular emphasis will be placed on any Internet and extra-net configurations, Virtual Private Network (VPN) configurations, modem access points, wireless access points, intrusion detection systems, routers, firewalls, switches, and radio and land-based telemetry systems. RAM-W questionnaires/worksheets will be utilized. A review of IS and SCADA policies and procedures will be perlormed. This will include email policies, acceptable internet use policies, password policies, hiring / termination policies, anti-virus policies, system log policies, incident response policies, remote access policies, system / network administrator certification and training policies, backup and restore policies, and business continuity / disaster recovery plans and policies. It is anticipated that the SCADA/Cyber on-site assessment will require a total of one and one-half (1 1/2) days on site. Westin report formats will be utilized. Unlike physical security, computer and SCADA security cannot be fully evaluated by visual inspection. Hackers utilize electronic tools to search for security holes in Operating Systems, software, and network infrastructure. The only means of detecting these holes is by analyzing the systems electronically. Westin will perlorm Automated Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 Professional Services Agreement Page 6 Vulnerability Detection to properly evaluate the City's systems. Westin report formats will be utilized. Subtask 3.4. Assessment of Security Policies and Procedures fIDR will review written security poliGies to evaluate policies and procedures. Items to be included are: Entry control procedures. Acc~ss to keys. Reporting Arrangements with police and private security' companies. Responding to alarms. Policies regarding distribution of sensitive information. City staff will study case histories of responses to vandalism, intrusion, or theft to assess current practices and include threats to City staff. fIDR will provide general comment of . Policies and Procedures assessment as part of the Task 4.0 effort. Task 3.0 Products HDR: System block diagram Schedule for onsite physical assessment Documentation of Operator interviews. Field notes and digital photographs. Ranking of which water facilities are most likely to be successfully attacked. Documents describing present control system architecture. Summary of existing Security policies and Procedures. Case Histories of security threat responses, including threats to City staff. Draft vulnerability assessment of SCADA system including Automated Vulnerability Detection reports Task 4.0. Performance -Based Risk Evaluation fIDR will produce fault trees for use in conducting the Risk Analysis and Consequence Assessments. IIDR will conduct a risk analysis for the existing security system as a baseline comparison for security system enhancement recommendations. The risk analysis will be conducted using the RAM_WSM risk equations and the values for probability of security system effectivenes~s and consequence of the loss from attack. fIDR will perform a consequence assessment for each critical facility: Consequence assessments will estimate consequences including economic loss, business disruption, Vulnerability Assessment Project Alnendment No.1 Professional Services Agreenlent Page 7 ( \ repair and/or cleanup, and public confidence. The consequence assessments will be based upon the design basis threat. The Consequence Assessments will include: Developed measures of consequence. Developed consequences for each facility. Ranking of critical assets. Evaluation of existing protection systems at each critical system. Assessment of system's ability to detect, delay and respond. Assessment of operational protection measures. HDR will perform a facilities upgrade analysis to identify security upgrades required to achieve the amount of risk reduction desired. City staff must decide upon the desired level of protection and corresponding risk reduction prior to the upgrade analysis. The goal will be the application of countermeasures to the risk equation until the desired level of risk is attained. The upgrade analysis will include: A calculation of system effectiveness for each critical facility Consideration of adversary paths. Evaluation' of physical protection or operations systems for delay, detection, and response. Identification of vulnerabilities. Calculation of risk associated with each critical facility based on the design basis threat, the consequences analysis and the security system effectiveness. Task 4.0 Deliverables HDR: Fault Trees for Critical Systems Draft Consequence Assessments Upgrade analysis Meridian: Written comment on Fault trees, Consequence Assessments, and upgrades analysis. Vulnerability Assessment Project Page 8 Anzendment No. J Professional Services Agreement I' ( ( Task 5.0. Prioritized 'Plan for Security Improvements and Final Security Plan Subtask 5.1 Implementation Plan HDR will develop a list of the most feasible, cost-effective fixes, upgrades, and capital projects to reduce identified water system vulnerabilities. HDR will prepare a detailed plan for implementation based on a prioritization of potential improvements. The implementation plan will : Recommend security enhancements, if appropriate, for critical facilities that may include a combination of physical and electronic security as well as operations procedures Apply the risk analysis to each recommended security enhancement to determine if the desired reduction in risk is achieved. Provide planning level budgetary level estimates for the anticipated implementation cost for each enhancement. HDR will conduct a review meeting of the Draft Implementation Plan. Subtask 5.2 Security Plan HDR will prepare the draft of the Security Plan. The draft Plan will include a summary of all analyses performed and direction received from City Staff during this phase of the project. The draft Plan will identify potential security enhancement alternatives for each vulnerability as well as estimated capital costs.' In addition, an implementation plan will also be part of the Security Plan, and be based on the CIP for the City. The content of this draft Plan is highly confidential. Each copy of the draft Pl,an will be numbered, and HDR will produce a tracking log for each copy of the draft Plan. All reviewers must make all comments on the draft version and return the original to the City's project manager. HDR will conduct a review meeting of the draft Security Plan. HDR staff will incorporate recommendations into a revised Final Security Plan. The final security plan will identify all upgrades, enhancements, or procedural modifications. Task 5.0 Products HDR: Draft and Final Implementation Plan Draft and Final Security Plan Meridian: Comments on draft Implementation and Security Plans Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 Professional Services Agreement Page 9 Section 2. Compensation For services described in this Amendment, payment shall be made on the same basis as in the original Agreement. Direct Labor Costs used as a basis for payment shall be updated to current salary and wages paid to all Engineer's personnel engaged directly on the Project, including, but not limited to, engineers, architects, surveyors, desi~ers, drafting personnel, specification writers, estimators, and other technical and business personnel; but does not include indirect payroll-related costs or fringe benefits. The City shall pay Engineer's direct expenses incurred in providing services, including the cost of sub consultants, on the same basis as in the original Agreement. The City's total consideration, including expenses, for services in Amendment No. 1 shall be $42,000, and the total Agreement shall be amended not to exceed $54,000. Payment for Additional Services: Compensation for additional services will be on the basis of a Lump Sum or Per Diem as agreed upon before the initiation of any such services. HDR will not perform any Additional Services activities without written authorization from the Public Works Department. HDR may recommend immediate security enhancements for vulnerable assets that may be at risk. At Meridian's request, HDR will provide a cost estimate for designlbuild services for these specific high priority enhancements. Designlbuild activities are not included in this scope of services. HDR will proceed with designlbuild services only upon authorization from the City. Section 3. Schedule Planning Workshop On-site Physical Assessment On-site SCADA Assessment Risk Evaluation Submittal Review Meeting Draft Implementation Plan Review Meeting Draft Security Plan Review Meeting Final Security Plan 14 days after NTP 21 days after NTP 28 days after NTP 60 days after NTP 75 days after NTP 90 days after NTP 105 days after NTP 120 days after NTP 135 days after NTP 150 days after NTP Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 Professional Sen1ices Agreement Page 10 CITY OF :MERIDIAN HDR ENGINEERING, INC. Mayor ATTEST: William G. Berg, City Clerk Vulnerability Assesslnent Project Amendment No. I Professional Services Agreement Page II ( November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 3-1 ITEM NO. REQUEST License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile and Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: See Attached Memo / Agreement Vv rf~ ~ Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Memo -01r1 ~ \ f4~ ~..6.. ti.1 ...--~" ' 1f;1 T -~ ,>oW' 'I~','l "i"'- \, IH ~ '1 if. 4 ~ ~ JL~..J _I ~"i _~~~",!i. !."J!f' To: Brad Watson From: Lenard Grady 01 (j ~, CC: Gary Smith Date: 11/13/2003 NOV -1 3 2003 ~ . ~ i t \] () r 1\ 1 e I~i di ~ 1" I J t='~i(v (:l(~~rk ()fficc Re: Proposed Agenda Items for November 18, 2003 City Council Meeting The Public Works Department respectfully requests the following item(s) be placed on the November 18 City Council consent agenda: Headworks Expansion Proieet Four bids were received for this project as summarized below: . Contractors Northwest Performance Systems International Guho Corporation The Ewing Company $892,046.00 $961 ,900.00 $1 ,002,800.00 $1,007,800.00 . . . This project will expand the headworks and is scheduled to last 300 days. Contractors Northwest is the apparent low bidder. The bid tabulation is attached. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $892,046.00 contract with Contractors Northwest, Inc for The Headworks Expansion Project and authorize the Mayor to sign it. DAFT Chanae Order #3 This project is being constructed by The Ewing Company and is nearing completion. The attached change order includes the following: . Installation of a 2" potable water line to the Mechanical Building Installation of a Pressure Gauge on the DAFT Installation of WAS seal water station Installation of RAS/W AS piping to allow greater flexibility and redundancy From the desk of. . . . . . Lenard Grady Staff Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 660 E. Watertower, Suite 200 Meridian, Idaho 83642 . Page 1 (208) 898-5500 Fax: (208) 887-1297 gradyl@meridiancity.org ( The total for Change Order #3 is $9,705.96 bringing the contract total to $845,997.82. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve the $9,705.96 Change Order #3 with The Ewing Company and authorize the Mayor to sign it. The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. Approval of this amendment, for $26,744.00, will allow completion of the Manual and develop safety procedures completing this project. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $26,744.00 with HDR for The Facilities Assessment & Safety Manual Contractors Northwest and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Vulnerability Assessment Proiect - Amendment #1 HDR has finished Phase 1 of this project. This project is required by EPA to be complete by July of 2004. Approval of this amendment, for $42,000, will allow completion of a complete site assessment, evaluation of the security of our SCADA system, and the final report to EPA. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Amendment #1 for $42,000.00 with HDR for The Vulnerability Assessment Project and allow the Mayor to sign it. ~ License Aoreement with NMID to Cross Ten Mile, Eioht Mile, Nine Mile and Ridenbauoh Attached is an agreement with NMID to cross the above canals with our 12" water main on Victory Road. Recommended Council Action: The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve License Agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District to cross Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile and Ridenbaugh and authorize the Mayor to sign it. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding any of these items. . Page 2 ( RINGERT C:+CLARK CHARTERED LA WYERS October 2,. 2003 Laura E. Burri Jeffrey R. ChriStenson David P. Claiborne D. Blair Clark Michael J. Doolittle S. Bryce Farris David Hammerquist Charles L. Honsinger Joseph B. Jones James P. Kaufman Jennifer Reid Mahoney James G. Reid Daniel V. Steenson Allyn L. Sweeney William F. Ringert. of Counsel Samuel Kaufman (192 I. } 986) Corey Peacock Civil Survey Consultants 100 South Adkins Way, Suite 101 Meridian, ill 83642 Re: Request for License Agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile Drain, Eight Mile Lateral, Nine Mile Drain and Ridenbaugh Canal with a water line. Dear Corey: Enclosed for review and signature are duplicate originals of the above-referenced License Agreement which you requested on behalf of the City of Meridian. . Both originals of the Agreement must be signed and notarized as indicated. Do not date page one of the agreement. Ifboth originals are executed and returned to me by October 15, 2003, I will be able to submit the agreement to the District's Board of Directors for approval and signature at the Board's next meeting on October 21, 2003. The District will then have its original recorded and return your original to you with a bill for our services in preparing the agreement and the recording fees. . Please contact ~e if you have any questions. Yours very truly, ~ S. Bryce Farris Enclosures 455 South Third Street + P.O. Box 2773 + Boise, Idaho 83701 + 208/342-4591 FAX 342-4657 LICENSE AGREEMENT LICENSE AGREEMENT, made and entered into this _ day of , 2003, by and among NAMP A & MERlD IAN IRRI GA TI ON D IS TRI CT, an irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State ofIdaho, party of the first part, hereinafter referred to as the "District", and CITY OF MERIDIAN, 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho 83642 party or parties of the second part, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Licensee", W ! I N g .s. .s. ~ I H: WHEREAS, Licensee is the owner of real property/right-of-way for a water line (burdened with the easement of the District hereinafter mentioned) particularly described in the "Legal Description" attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the District owns the irrigation ditch or canal known as TEN MILE DRAIN. EIGHT MILE LATERAL. NINE MILE DRAIN AND RIDENBAUGH CANAL (hereinafter collectively referred to as "ditch or canal"), an integral part of the District's irrigation works and system, together with the easement therefor to convey irrigation water, operate, clean, maintain, and repair the ditch or canal, and access the ditch or canal for those purposes; and, WHEREAS, said ditch or canal and easement crosses and intersects Licensee's real property as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the Licensee desires a license to engage in construction or activity affecting' said ditch or canal or the District's easement in its course across the lands of the Licensee in the manner and under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary that the District protect absolutely its right to control any modification or alteration of its watercourses and its right of way along its watercourses; NOW, lHEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of the covenants, agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Licensee shall have the right to modify the said ditch or canal or encroach upon the District's easement along" said ditch or canal in the manner generally described in the "Purpose of License" attached hereto as Exhibit C and by this reference made a part hereof Any modification of said ditch or canal by the Licensee or encroachment upon the District's easement along said ditch or canal shall be performed and maintained in accordance with the "Special Conditions" stated in Exhibit D, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. This agreement pertains only to the Licensee's modification of said ditch or canal or encroachment to the District's easement for the purposes and in the manner described herein. The Licensee shall not change the location of the ditch or canal, bury the ditch or canal in pipe, or otherwise alter the ditch or canal in any manner not described in this agreement without first obtaining the written permission of the District. 3. Each facility ("facility" as used in this agreement means any <?bject or thing of any nature installed in or on the District's easement by the Licensee or the Licensee's predecessor in interest) shall be constructed, installed, operated, maintained, and repaired at all times by the Licensee at the cost and expense of the Licensee. 4. Licensee agrees to construct, install, operate, maintain and repair each facility and conduct its activities within or affecting the District's easement so as not to constitute or cause: a. a hazard to any person or property; b. an interruption or interference with the flow of irrigation water in the ditch or canal or the delivery of irrigation water by the District; c. an increase in seepage or any other increase in the loss of water from the ditch or canal; d. the subsidence of soil within or adjacent to the easement; e. any other damage to the District's easement and irrigation works. 5. The Licensee agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the District from all claims for damages arising out of any of the Licensee's construction or activity which constitutes or causes any of the circumstances enumerated in the preceding paragraph, 4.a. through 4.e., or any other damage to the easement and irrigation works which may be caused by the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, and any use or condition of any facility. 6. Licensee agrees that the work performed and the materials used in such construction shall at all times be subject to inspection by the District and the District's engineers, and that final acceptance of such work shall not be made until all such work and materials shall have been expressly approved by the District. Such approval by the District shall not be unreasonably withheld. 7. The District reserves the right, at the District's option, to remove any facility installed by the Licensee and to repair any alteration by the Licensee of said ditch or canal and the easement therefor which does not comply with the terms of this agreement, and to remove any impediment to the flow of water in said ditch or canal and any unsafe condition or hazard caused by the Licensee, at any time, and the Licensee agrees to pay to the District, on demand, the costs which shall be reasonably expended by the District for such purposes. If the Licensee shall fail in any respect to properly maintain and repair such facility, then the District, at its option, and without impairing or in anywise affecting its other rights and remedies hereunder, shall have the right to perform the necessary maintenance and repairs and the Licensee agrees to pay to the District, on demand, the cost or expense which shall be reasonably expended or incurred by the District for such purposes. The District shall give reasonable notice to the Licensee prior to the District's performing such maintenance, repair or other work except that in cases of emergency the,District shall attempt to give such LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 2 notice as reasonable under the circumstances. Nothing in this paragraph shall create or support any claim of any kind by Licensee or any third party against the District for failure to exercise the options stated in this paragraph, and Licensee shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the District from any claims made against the District arising out of or relating to the terms of this paragraph except for claims arising solely out of the negligence of the District. 8. Neither the terms of this agreement, the permission granted by the Districtto the Licensee, the Licensee's activity which is the subj ect of this agreement, nor the parties exercise of any rights or performance of any obligations of this agreement, shall be construed or asserted to extend the application of any statute, rule, regulation, directive or other requirement, or the jurisdiction of any federal, state, or other agency or official to the District's ownership, operation, and maintenance of its ditches, canals, drains, irrigation works and facilities which did not apply to the District's operations and activities prior to and without execution of this agreement. In the event the District is required to comply with any such requirements or is subject to the jurisdiction of any such agency as a result of execution of this agreement or the Licensee's activity authorized hereunder, Licensee shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the District from all costs and liabilities associated with the application of such laws or the assertion of such jurisdiction or, at the option of the District, this agreement shall be of no force and effect and the Licensee shall cease all activity and remove any facility authorized by this agreement. 9. In addition to all other indemnification provisions herein, Licensee further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the District from any ~ury, damages, claim, lien, cost and/or expense (including reasonable attorney's fees) incurred by, or asserted against, the District by reason of the negligent acts or omissions of Licensee or its agents, contractors or subcontractors in performing the construction and activities authorized by this agreement. 10. The Licensee agrees that the District shall not be liable for any damages which shall occur to any facility, structure, plant, or any other improvement of any kind or nature whatsoever which the Licensee shall install on the said easement area of the District in the reasonable exercise of the rights of the District in the course of performance of maintenance or repair of said ditch or canal. The Licensee further agrees to suspend its use of the said easement area when the use of the easement area is required by the District for maintenance or repair under this or any other paragraph of this agreement. 11. Licensee shall place no structures or landscaping of any kind above within the District's easement area except as referred to in this agreement or exhibits hereto without the prior written consent of the District. 12. Should either party incur costs or attorney fees in connection with efforts to enforce the provisions of this agreement, whether by institution of suit or not, the party rightfully enforcing or rightfully resisting enforcement of the provisions of this agreement, or the prevailing party in case suit is instituted, shall be entitled to reimbursement for its costs and reasonable attorney fees from the other party. 13. The parties hereto understand and agree that the District has no right in any respect to impair the uses and purposes of the irrigation works and system of the District by this agreement, nor to grant any rights in its irrigation works and system incompatible with the uses to which such irrigation works and system are devoted and dedicated and that this contract shall be at all times construed according to such principles. ;. LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 3 14. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to impair the right of way of the District in the said ditch or canal and all uses of said ditch or canal by the Licensee and the license herein provided therefor shall remain inferior and subservient to the rights of the District to the use of said ditch or canal for the transmission and delivery of irrigation water. 15. In the event of the failure, refusal or neglect of the Licensee to comply with all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the license of the Licensee under the terms hereof may be terminated by the District, and any facility, structure, plant, or any other improvement in or over said ditch or canal, and the right of way therefor, which may impede or restrict the maintenance and operation of such ditch or canal by the District with its equipment for the maintenance of its said ditch or canal may be removed by the District. 16. The Licensee agrees to pay attorney fees or engineering fees charged by the attorney for the District or by the engineers for the District in connection with the preparation of this License Agreement or in connection with negotiations covering the terms and conditions of this License Agreement. Licensee also agrees to pay any fees incurred in connection with the recording of this Agreement. 17. Nothing in this agreement shall create or support a claim of estoppel, waiver, prescription or adverse possession by the Licensee or any third party against District. 18. third party. This agreement is not intended for the benefit of any third party and is not enforceable by any 19. If any provision of this agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or otherwise unenforceable, all remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 20. The word "Licensee", if used in the neuter in this agreement, includes the masculine and feminine genders, the singular number includes the plural, and the plural number includes the singular. The covenants, conditions and agreements herein contained shall constitute covenants to run with, and running with, all of the lands of the Licensee described in said Exhibit A, and shall be binding on each of the parties hereto and on all parties and all persons claiming under them or either of them, and the advantages hereof shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. NAMPA & MERlDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRlCT ATTEST: By Its President Its Secretary LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN By ATTEST: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Canyon ) On this _ day of , 2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Ralph B. Wissell and Daren R. Coon, knO"WIl to me to be the President and Secretary, respectively, ofNAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at , Idaho My Commission Expires: STATE OF IDAHO ) )ss. County of Ada ) On this _ day of ,2003, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said state, personally appeared and , known to me to be the and , respectively, of the CITY OF MERIDIAN, the political subdivision and municipality that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that such entity executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. . Notary Public for Residing at My Commission Expires: LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 5 EXHIBIT A Legal Description A right-of-way in Victory Road in Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Sections 19 and 20, B.M., Ada County, Idaho. EXHIBIT C Purpose of License The purpose of this License Agreement is to permit Licensee to construct and install a water line within and under the District's easements for the Ten Mile Drain, Eight Mile Lateral, Nine Mile Drain and Ridenbaugh Canal, all within Li~ensee' s right-of-way, described in Exhibit A and the right-of-way for Victory Road, located west of the intersection of Eagle Road and Victory Road in Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. EXI-llBIT D Special Conditions a. Construction shall be in accordance with certain plans consisting of four sheets: sheet 3 of 7 entitled "City of Meridian, Water System Improvements, New Water Mail Line Plan," bearing engineer's stamp dated August 19,2003; sheet 4 of7 entitled "City of Meridian, Water System Improvements, New Water Mail Line Plan," bearing engineer's stamp dated August 19, 2003; sheet 5 of 7 entitled "City of Meridian, Water System Improvements, N ew Water Mail Line Plan," bearing engineer's stamp dated August 19, 2003; and sheet 7 of 7 entitled "City of Meridian, Water System Improvements, Crossing Details," bearing engineer's stamp dated August 19, 2003. These plans have been delivered to the District's water superintendent, are in his possession in his offices, and are hereby incorporated by this reference. b. Licensee shall notify the water superintendent of the District prior to and immediately after construction so that he or the District's engineer's may inspect and approve the construction. C. The Licensee recognizes and acknowledges that the license granted in this agreement by the District pertains only to the rights of the District as ovvner of an easement. The District has no right or power to create rights in the Licensee affecting the holder' of title to the property subject to the District's easement. Any such rights affecting fee title must be acquired by the Licensee from the holder of title to the property. Should Licensee fail to obtain such rights from the holder of title to the property or should the rights obtained prove legally ineffectual, Licensee shall hold harmless, indenmify and defend the District from any claim by any party arising out of or related to such failure of rights and at the option of the District this agreement shall be of no force and effect. d. Licensee shall not excavate, discharge, place any structures, nor plant any trees, shrubs or landscaping within the District's easement, nor perform any construction or activity within the District's easements for the Ten Mile Drain, Eight Mile Lateral, Nine Mile Drain and Ridenbaugh Canal except as referred to in this agreement or exhibits thereto without the prior written consent of the District. The District's easement for the Ten Mile Drain is 100 feet, 50 feet to either side of the centerline. The District's easement r LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 6 ( f l for the Eight Mile Lateral is 80 feet, 40 feet to either side of the centerline. The District's easement for the Nine Mile Drain is 60 feet, 30 feet to either side of the centerline. The District's easement for the Ridenbaugh Canal is 100 feet, 50 feet to either side of the centerline. e. Construction of the water line crossing the Eight Mile Lateral and Ridenbaugh Canal shall not commence prior to October 15, 2003 and shall be completed prior to March 15, 2004. All other construction shall be completed one year from the date of this Agreement. Time is of the essence. LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 7 ,- 1 Ten Mile Drain, Eight Mile Lateral ~ !~i~:": Nine Mile Drain, and Ridenbaugh C~nal ~ . in Sections 19&20, 13N, R.1E, B.M., Ada County, Idaho (August 1994) Exhibit B ( ~~Rr F ;E>'I. -\llfD; ..} ... _ -'-.:A l_ w ..l:J ~~OV 2 4 2003 t~lt\r elf Meridian Ci{y Clerlz Office WHITE PETERSON KEvIN E. DINIUS JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GIGRA Yi III T. GUY HALLAM * JILL HOLINKA D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WlLLlAMA. MORROW WILLlAM F. NICHOLS. CHRISTOPHER S. NYE WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. PHILIP A. PETERSON A L NAMP A OFFICE ERICAS. PHILLIPS TTORNEYS AT A W 5700 E. FRANKLIN Roo, ERIC S. ROSSMAN SUITE 200 TODD A. ROSSMAN NAMP A, IDAHO 83687-8402 TERRENCE R. WHITE.* TEL. (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466-4405 *Also admitted in OR ** Also admitted in W A November 21, 2003 William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. / MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2 SUBDIVISION / FINAL PLAT - (FP-03-059) Dear Will: Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, Wm. F. Nichols Z:\Work\M\Ivleridian\Meridian 1 536DM\Messina Hills Sub No.2 FP-03-059\ClerkFPltr 11 21 D3.doc ( BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 11/18/03 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) APPLICATION OF TUSCANY ) DEVELOPMENT, INC. FOR ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ) MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION ) NO.2, LOCATED BETWEEN ) SOUTH LOCUST GROVE ROAD ) AND SOUTH EAGLE ROAD, ) SOUTH OF EAST VICTORY ROAD, ) MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) ) CASE NO. FP-03-059 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code S 12-3-7 on November 18, 2003, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Sonya Allen Planner I for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and that Anna Powell Plaill1ing Director for the Planning and Zoning Department, commented at the hearing, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of "MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2" as evidenced in Plat bearing: "PLAT OF MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2, A PORTION OF THE N ~ ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2 / (FP-03-059) Page 1 of5 ( SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2003, #21109 \21109-PLT.DWG MEM 10/15/03, SHEET 1 OF 3, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 10/15/03, STAMPED DATE: OCT 15 2003, TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC.- DEVELOPER, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. - CONSULTING ENGINEERS", Tuscany Development, Inc., Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Sonya Allen Planner I for the Planning and Zoning Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 18,2003, listing 7 General Requirements and 18 Site Specific Requirements/Final Plat, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of five pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the applicant submitted a letter stating he is in support of the conditions of approval, and the additional requirements from the action of the Council taken at their November 18, 2003 meeting as follows, to-wit: 1.1 Comply with the Meridian Fire Department's requirements as follows: 1. One and two family dwellings will require a fire-flow of 1,000 gallons per minute available for duration of2 hours to service the entire project Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. 3. Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department thru the Public Warks Department. 4. The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in length to be provided with an approved turn around. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2 I (FP-03-059) Page 2 of5 5. All roads shall have a turning radius of 28' inside and 48' outside. 6. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. 7. A minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. 8. The roadways shall be built to Ada County Highway Standards and shall have a clear driving surface, available at all times, which is 20' wide. 1.2 The Central District Health Department requires after written approval from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance: 1. State of Idaho Catalog Of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. 2. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000. 1.3 Additionally, the applicant shall be allowed the following revisions to the Final Plat, per action of the City Council taken at their November 18, 2003 meeting as follows: 1. The applicant is allowed to relocate East Palarmo Drive which shall be shifted to the north by one lot depth. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2 / (FP-03-059) Page 3 of5 2. The applicant is allowed to change Lot 2 Block 17 from a building lot to build a club house and pool house, which would allow for an additional amenity within the subdivision. The applicant shall also be allowed to relocate that buildable single family residential lot into a future phase of the subdivision. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2 / (FP-03-059) Page 4 of 5 interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the I/o{/e~~ /&-1& day of , 2003. Attest: \\\"Uffllll/ 7dh.,ht" e{f2 W~L.rpG -l'r~J/<<4""~ \\\ 1// J '"J.u / .. ,,\\~ Of MUr;j'\/i,// C;-J c,P4~ "" ~ " VL" //'i ~..... (j~ tlPOl') A -lA~ "/ ..... rO'''' ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~v ~O S - ~ - - - - - = ~ SEAL William G. Berg, Jr., By:JI-~~~i ct. City Clerk ' Dated: 1/- 21--tJ3 Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360rvM1essina Hills Sub No.2 FP-03-059\OrderFP.doc ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR MESSINA HILLS SUBDIVISION NO.2 / (FP-03-059) Page 5 of5 ( ( MA YOR Robelt D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE V ALLEY A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 . Fax 466-4405 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tanuny deWeerd Keith Bird Cherie McCandless WilliatTI L.M. Naty CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 . FAX (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEP ARTMENT (208) 884-5533 . FAX 888-6854 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission (11{ Sonya Allen, Planner I CJ ~ Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech ~ From: Re: Messina Hills Subdivision No.2 · Final Plat approval of One-Hundred (100) Single-Family Residential Building Lots and Five (5) Other Lots on 36.66 Acres in an R-4 (P.D.) Zone, by Tuscany Development, Inc. (File No. FP-03-059). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUl\1MARY The applicant, Tuscany Development, Inc., has applied for Final Plat approval of Messina Hills Subdivision No.2 consisting of 100 single-family residential building lots and 5 conunon lots on 36.66 acres of land. The zoning designation for the proposed subdivision is R-4 (Low Density Residential). This subdivision will have a gross density of 2.72 d.u./acre and a net density of 3.47 d.u.facre. The minimum square footage for single-family residential building lots within the R-4 zone is 8,000 s.f., with a minimum house size of 1,400 s.f., excluding garage(s). The five conunon lots within the subdivision consist of landscape, homeowner pedestrian access, and recreational lots which will be owned and maintained by the Messina Hills Homeowners Association. The pressurized irrigation system within this development will be owned and maintained by the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District. The submitted [mal plat substantially complies with the approved preliminary plat; however, there were a couple of changes made on the final plat. The location of E. Palermo Drive (formerly W. Dartmoor Dr.) was shifted to the north by one lot depth; however, the total number of lots within this phase stayed the same so staff has no objections to this change. The applicant is also proposing to add a clubhouse and pool on Lot 2, Block 17 that was previously approved as a building lot on the preliminary plat. The applicant states that the shortage of one building lot in this phase will be mitigated in Phase 3 of this subdivision. The applicant did EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 1 OF 5 ( Planning & Zoning Commisslon/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 2 ( obtain prior approval for this change from the Planning Director. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance will be required for the addition of a clubhouse and pool prior to issuance of building permit(s) on Lot 2, Block 17. A Conditional Use Permit (Planned Development) was approved for this subdivision. The only reduction to the ordinance that was approved with the Planned Development that applies to this phase is reduced lot frontages. A specific minimum frontage was not identified in the CUP; however, all lots within the subdivision meet or exceed the minimum lot square footage requirements. Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Messina Hills Subdivision No. 2 with the comments and conditions stated in this report. LOCATION The proposed Messina Hills Subdivision No.2 is located midway between S. Locust Grove Road and S. Eagle Road, approximately IAmile south of E. Victory Road in the south Ih of the north 1/2 of Section 29, T.3N., R.IE. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: Rural-residentiaVagricultural property zoned RUT (Ada County); Messina Hills Subdivision No. 1 (recently approved), zoned R-4. West: Tuscany Lakes Subdivision (recently approved), zoned R-4. East: Messina Village Subdivision (recently approved), zoned R-4. South: Rural-residential/agricultural properties, zoned RUT (Ada County). SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-02-005), preliminary plat (PP-02-006), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP-02-006). 2. The applicant has indicated that the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District will own and maintain the pressure irrigation system within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the municipal water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 3. Fencing is approved as shown on the Landscape Plan with the following additions: Fencing is also required to be installed by the developer adjacent to the common area on EXHffiIT "A" PAGE 2 OF 5 f ( Planning & Zoning CommissIon/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 3 Lot 2, Block 18 and Lot 15, Block 12; temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be required along the northern boundary of this phase west of the Ridenbaugh Canal and along the eastern portion of this phase adjacent to the Ridenbaugh Canal unless fencing already exists in these locations or at the subdivision boundaries. All fencing shall be reduced to three feet in height within twenty feet of the right-of-way. 4. The proposed landscape plan (prepared by The Land Group, entitled L-C, L-l, L-2, & L-3, dated 9/30/03) is approved as submitted. 5. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall be submitted for approval for the addition of a clubhouse and pool prior to issuance of building permit(s) on Lot 2, Block 17. 6. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits. All development improvements, including perimeter fencing, irrigation, and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, amenities, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 7. Sanitary sewer and municipal water service to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 8. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374. 10. Revise or add the following notes to the face of the plat: (1.) .. .to any public street and Ten (10) feet adiacent to the rear lot lines and subdivision boundary. This easement. . . (8.) Delete: "Each single famil)r structure shall contain a minimum of 1,101 square feet, eJ(cluding garage." (No longer required to b-e shown on the plat.) (11.) Complete Instrument No. (12.) Complete Instrument No. (17.) Add note: The pressurized irrigation system within this development is owned and maintained by the N amp a & Meridian Irrigation District. EXHffiIT "A" PAGE 3 OF 5 / '-. Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 4 11. Revise "E. Romeo Way" on the face of the plat to read "E. Romeo Drive" per the approved street names on the Ada County Street Name Evaluation letter. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. Provide call-outs on the Eight-Mile Lateral centerline, and dimension the width of the easement. Provide a copy of the executed encroachment agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District for all the lots that encroach within the Eight-Mile Lateral easement. 14. Rotate the right-of-way width dimension on Tybalt Dr., near the intersection of Beatrice Dr. to be perpendicular to the right-of-way. 15. Graphically depict five (5) foot wide public utilities, drainage, and irrigation easement along the north side of Lot 2, Block 18, Lot 1, Block 17, Lot 1, Block 15, Lot 1, Block 13, and Lot 2, Block 6, and along the west side of Lot 10, Block 9, Lot 1-2, Block 8, Lot 1-2, Block 7, and Lot 30, Block 1, as these will be side lot lines against future phases. 16. Add the missing distance dimension on the south side of Lot 3, Block 11, and the west side of Lot 30, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 7. 17. Identify the easement crossing the southeast comer of Lot 3, Block 11. 18. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved annexation, preliminary plat or conditional use permit does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation! drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two-hundred-fifty and IOO-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at EXHIBIT" A" PAGE 4 OF 5 ( Planning & Zoning Commisslon/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 5 subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 5 Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 7. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Messina Hills Subdivision No.2 with the above stated comments and conditions. EXHffiIT "A" PAGE 5 OF 5 /~ ( ( RECRT'TEr~ NO\l 2 <~ 2003 Citv of Meridian City Clerk Office WHITE PETERSON KEvIN E. DINIUS JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GIGRA Y, In T. GUYHAu.AM* JILL HOLINKA D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WILLIAM A. MORROW WILLIAM F. NICHOl.S* CHRJSTOPHER S. NYE WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE& ROSSMAN, P.A. :~~:s~'p~:~ON ArrORNEYS AT LAW NAMPAOFFICE 5700 E. FRANKLIN RD., ERJC S. ROSSMAN SUITE 200 TODDA. ROSSMAN NAMPA.IDAHO 83687-8402 TERRENCE R. WHITE** TEL. (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466-4405 *Also admitted in OR ** Also admitted in W A November 21, 2003 William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC. / TUSCANY LAKES SUBDIVISION NO.2 SUBDIVISION / FINAL PLAT - (FP-03-060) Dear Will: Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, Wm. F. Nichols Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Tuscany Lakes Sub No.2 FP-03-060\ClerkFPltr 11 21 03.doc ( BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL C/C 11/18/03 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) APPLICATION OF TUSCANY ) DEVELOPMENT, INC. FOR ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ) TUSCANY LAKES SUBDIVISION ) NO.2, LOCATED EAST OF SOUTH ) LOCUST GROVE ROAD AND ) SOUTH OF EAST VICTORY ROAD, ) MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) ) CASE NO. FP-03-060 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code 9 12-3-7 on November 18, 2003, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Sonya Allen Planner I for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and that Anna Powell Planning Director for the Planning and Zoning Department, commented at the hearing, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of "TUSCANY LAKES SUBDIVISION NO.2" as evidenced in Plat bearing: "PLAT OF TUSCANY LAKES SUBDIVISION NO.2, A PORTION OF THE NW ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUSCANY LAKES SUBDIVISION NO.2 / (FP-03-060) Page 1 of 4 <' - ( 1/4 SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2003,#21102 \21102-PLT.DWG MEM 10/10/03, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 10/10/03, STAMPED DATE: OCT 102003, TUSCANY DEVELOPMENT, INC.- DEVELOPER, BRIGGS ENGINEERING, INC. - CONSULTING ENGINEERS", Tuscany Development, Inc., Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Sonya Allen Planner I for the Planning and Zoning Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 18, 2003, listing 7 General Requirements and 10 Site Specific Requirements/Final Plat, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of four pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the applicant submitted a letter stating he is in support of the conditions of approval, and the additional requirements from the action of the Council taken at their November 18, 2003 meeting as follows, to-wit: 1.1 The Central District Health Department requires after written approval from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUSCANY LAKES SUBDMSION NO.2 / (FP-03-060) Page 2 of 4 ( 1. State of Idaho Catalog Of Storm water Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. 2. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000. 1.2 Per testimony at the City Council meeting of November 18,2003, the following was noted on record: 1. That this subdivision has all common lots in a road dedication, with no building lots. This was necessary to provide for a secondary access between Messina Hills Subdivision and Tuscany Lakes Subdivision which provides the extension of Pal arm 0 Drive. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUSCANY LAKES SUBDIVISION NO.2 / (FP-03-060) Page 3 of 4 ( ( City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code 9 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ;/PJ/~Ih~ I & -I'A day of , 2003. RG \ \ \\ UII" flU / / I ~ fay'DI CityT of ~ 4cridiaB \\\\ 'f MJ':"i:"').. 1111 v, v "",~-{ 0 ....'tft)I.At14rnh-r,,~ d, /tfJU4tL /l"er/LeJ 04 C~t.h~ ~" a O~'h ~ 7~ 2: ~ ~o ~ .:- ~ -:. ~ ~ '&.-: A = SEAL = d/'M /..,1- I:; 7. ~ ~ William G. Berg, Jr., CI y erk ~ ~ ~V.(\ ,cf 0 f '/'^ UI 15\ · ~ ~ -;.. v....., ~ ~ """", ~ 1 ~...u.J. ~ ,,-' Copy served upon Applicant, the Pla~jJH?tW~~Bit\~Department, Public Works Department, '1//' "\\\\ and City Attorney iU q ~ n t:' \ \ l' n II 'ifill/ . \\\\ . III ,\,,\\ "l OF M%f'\ 1/1/// " ,.~ v~ /; ~ v- a~... -'A~ ~ ;: . ~cJo, - -.1JCf ~ ~y ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ , , Dated: /1- t1-f) 3 ~ ~ Attest: By:Jf~,B ~I' ~ City Clerk Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Tuscany Lakes Sub No.2 FP-03-060\OrderFP.doc ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TUSCANY LAKES SUBDIVISION NO.2 / (FP-03-060) Page 4 of 4 MA YOR Robert D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE V ALLEY A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 . Fax 466-4405 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy deWeerd Keith Bird Cherie McCandless Williatn L.M. Naty CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 . FAX (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 . FAX 888-6854 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission JYl Sonya Allen, Planner I ( ~ Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech ~ From: Re: Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No.2 · Final Plat approval of Six (6) Common Lots on 1.67 Acres in an R-4 Zone, by Tuscany Development, Inc. (File No. FP-03-060). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMl\1ARY The applicant, Tuscany Development, Inc., has applied for Final Plat approval of Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No. 2 consisting of six common lots on 1.67 acres of land. The zoning designation for this portion of the proposed subdivision is R-4 (Low Density Residential). The six common lots will be used for landscape and homeowner pedestrian access, and will be owned and maintained by the Tuscany Homeowners Association. The pressurized irrigation system within this portion will be owned and maintained by the N ampa & Meridian Irrigation District. The submitted final plat substantially complies with the approved preliminary plat; however, there was one minor change made on the fmal plat. Lot 1, Block 9 (Lot 44, Block 1 on the preliminary plat) was extended through Lot 37, Block 1 to the Eight Mile Lateral. The road and common lots are being platted separately on this phase because the Fire Department required this section of E. Palermo Drive to be constructed as a secondary access point between Messina Hills and Tuscany Lakes Subdivisions before subsequent building permits can be approved. Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No.2 with the comments and conditions stated in this report. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE lOF4 I" ( Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 2 ( LOCATION The proposed Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No.2 is located Approximately IAmile east of S. Locust Grove Road and 1/3 mile south of E. Victory Road in the NW IAof Section 29, T.3N., R.1E. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES This phase of Tuscany Lakes is surrounded on all sides by existing and future phases of Tuscany Lakes and Messina Hills Subdivisions. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved annexation (AZ-02-005), preliminary plat (PP-02-006), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP-02-006). 2. The applicant has indicated that the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District will own and maintain the pressure irrigation system within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the municipal water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 3. Fencing is approved as shown on the Landscape Plan (Sheet L-1) prepared by The Land Group, dated 9/30/03. All fencing shall be reduced to three feet in height within twenty feet of the right-of-way. 4. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized inigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits. All development improvements, including perimeter fencing, irrigation, and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, amenities, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 5. Sanitary sewer service and municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 20F4 ( Plalll1ing & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 3 ( Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 6. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment. 7. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374. 8. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 9. Provide call-outs on the Eight-Mile Lateral centerline, and dimension the width of the easement. Provide a copy of the executed encroachment agreement with Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District for all the lots that encroach within the Eight-Mile Lateral easement. 10. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved alll1exation, preliminary plat or conditional use permit does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association (ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two-hundred-fifty and 100-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 30F4 [' I Planning & Zoning Commisslon/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 4 / { 5 Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 7. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends approval of the final plat for Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No.2 with the above stated comments and conditions. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 40F4 RECEIVED t~OV 2 4 2003 City Of Meridian .City Clerk Office WHITE PETERSON KEvIN E. DINIUS JULIE KLE[N FISCHER WM. F. GIGRA Y, III T. GUY HAL lAM * JILL HOLINKA D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WILLIAMA. MORROW WILLIAM F. NICHOLS* CHRISTOPHER S. NYE WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIGRAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN, P.A. PHILIPA.PETERSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW NAMPAOFFICE ERICA S. PHILLIPS 5700 E. FRANKLIN Roo, ERIC S. ROSSMAN SUITE 200 ToooA. ROSSMAN NAMPA, IDAHO 83687-8402 TERRENCE R. WHITE** TEL. (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466-4405 * Also admitted in 0 R ** Also admitted in W A November 24,2003 William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION / KELLY CREEK SUBDIVISION NO.1 / FINAL PLAT - (FP-03-061) Dear Will: Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works, and the attorney's office. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, Wm. F. Nichols Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360tvN<.elly Creek Sub No.1 FP-03-06I\CIerkFPltr 11 2403.doc ( BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR KELLY CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH LINDER ROAD AND WEST McMILLAN ROAD, MERIDIAN, IDAHO C/C 11/18/03 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. FP-03-061 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code 9 12-3-7 on November 18, 2003, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Sonya Allen Planner I for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and that Anna Powell Planning Director for the Planning and Zoning Department, and Darin Fluke, commented at the hearing, and the Council having. considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR KELLY CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 / (FP-03-061) Page 1 of5 ,r-- ( IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of "KELL Y CREEK SUBDIVISION NO.1" as evidenced in Plat bearing: "PLAT SHOWING KELLY CREEK SUBDIVISION NO.1, A PORTION OF THE SOUTH Y1 OF THE SOUTHEAST ~ OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2003, GAL\11913FPl.dwg 10/02/03, SHEET 1 OF 3, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 10-2-03, KEVIN HOWELL CONSTRUCTION - DEVELOPER, J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. - ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS", Kevin Howell Construction, Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Engineering Technician III, and Sonya Allen Planner I for the Planning and Zoning Department, dated: Hearing Date: November 18, 2003, listing 7 General Requirements and 13 Site Specific Comments/Final Plat, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and consisting of five pages, and by this reference incorporated herein, and the additional requirements from the action of the Council taken at their November 18, 2003 meeting as follows, to-wit: 1.1 Adopt the Conditions of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 1. One and two family dwellings will require a fITe-flow of 1 ,000 gallons per minute available for duration of2 hours to service the entire proj ect. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix ill-A 2. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. 3. Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department thru the Public Works Department. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR KELLY CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 / (FP-03-061) Page 2 of5 ( 4. All roads shall have a turning radius of28' inside and 48' outside. 5. Operational fire hydrants and temporary or permanent street signs are required before combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3 6. The phasing plan may require that any roadway greater than 150' in length that is not provided with an outlet shall be required to have a turn around. 7. A minimum of two points of access will be required for any portion of the project, which serves more than 50 homes. UFC 902.2.1 8. The fIfe department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project be equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer 1.2 The Central District Health Department requires after written approval from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that stormwater be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance: 1. State of Idaho Catalog Of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. 2. Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, May 2000. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR KELLY CREEK SUBDMSION NO.1 / (FP-03-061) Page 3 of5 ( ( 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 1. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR KELLY CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 / (FP-03-061) Page 4 of5 (-- ( By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ~y~;y,~ / 8-11... day of , 2003. By. By:J~~~ 9~ City Clerk \\\\\\1"'111(/ . . n \\\\ M 1III ' ,,"'....t, Of Ef:;'D/ //////"7dMJt,.~ dR W.u...d.. LJA!Fid~~.j.. {/L,~ ((7t.v&d ....." ~ '-1A~ /{ u" I r~ Tj ~ CJ o~poft.1 ~ .. y ~ ~ --0 ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - = SEAL = 0) :::: illiam G. Berg, Jr., Ci CI rk ~ .,,~u ....~o 0 j ~ "C '81 15\ ' ~ $' ~ ~ ~~ ,-,' Copy served upon Applicant, the Plc?R1)j~-;;~ni~,rlepartment, Public Works Denartment, III ~ \\\ \\\\\lltflfllll/ and City Attorney. Illili In (! 1\\ \ \\\\\ Of MflTi.lllll ",,~--{ ~/~I//// " ~, ~ lA.. 'l .$' () ot\pO~ 'h .- y ~ ~ ~c; ~() ~ 2 ~ ~ '1-),4 -tJ:i ~ Dated: Attest: Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian I 5360MKeIly Creek Sub No. I FP-03-06I\OrderFP.doc - .... .... ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR KELLY CREEK SUBDIVISION NO.1 / (FP-03-061) Page 5 of5 ( (' MA YOR Robert D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 466-9272 · Fax 466-4405 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Tammy deWeerd Keith Bird Cherie McCandless Willimn L.M. Nary CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 . FAX (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 898-5500 . Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEP ARTMENT (208) 884-5533 . FAX 888-6854 STAFF REPORT: Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 To: Mayor, City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission fJI[ Sonya Allen, Planner I () ~ Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech~ From: Re: Kelly Creek Subdivision No.1 · Final Plat approval of Sixty-Three (63) Single-Family Residential Building Lots and Ten (10) Common Lots on 25.78 Acres in an R-8 (P.D.) Zone, by Kevin Howell Construction (File No. FP-03-061). We have reviewed the above referenced submittals and offer the following comments, as conditions of approval. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, Kevin Howell Construction, has applied for Final Plat approval of 63 single- family residential building lots and 10 common lots on 25.78 acres of land for Kelly Creek Subdivision No.1. The current zoning designation for the proposed subdivision is R-8 (Medium Density Residential). This subdivision will have a gross density of 2.44 d.u./acre. The connnon lots within the subdivision consist of common area landscape/drainage/pathway lots which will be owned and maintained by the Kelly Creek Neighborhood Association. The pressurized irrigation system within this development will be owned and maintained by Settler's Irrigation District. The submitted final plat substantially complies with the approved preliminary plat. Staff requested as a condition of the preliminary plat that the applicant include the future right-of- way along N. Linder Road in a common lot; they have done this. A Conditional Use Permit/Planned Development was approved for the proposed subdivision which allowed for a mix of residential and commercial uses in the R-8 zone, reduced lot sizes, reduced frontage requirements, and allowance of blocks within the subdivision to exceed the maximum block length of 1,000 feet. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 1 OF 5 (" Planning & Zoning CommissionlMayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 2 ( Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Kelly Creek Subdivision No. 1 with the comments and conditions stated in this report. LOCATION The proposed Kelly Creek Subdivision No.1 is located on the NW comer of N. Linder Road and W. McMillan Road in the SE V40f Section 26, T.4N., R.IW. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: Recently approved Lochsa Falls Subdivision (single-family residential), zoned R-4. West: Recently approved Lochsa Falls Subdivision (single-family residential), zoned R-4. East: Across N. Linder Rd., rural residential/agricultural land zoned RUT (Ada County). South: Across W. McMillan Rd., recently approved Bridgetower Crossing Sub., zoned R-4. SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS / FINAL PLAT 1. Applicant is to meet all terms of the approved conditional use permit (CUP-03-028), preliminary plat (PP-03-014) and Development Agreement (Inst. No.1 03181095). 2. The applicant has indicated that the Settler's Irrigation District will own and maintain the pressure irrigation system within this development. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the municipal water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 3. Per the Preliminary Plat Findings, fencing will be required along the east and west boundaries of the central park for a consistent appearance from within the park. Temporary construction fencing to contain debris shall be installed along the boundary of the subdivision where none exists. All other fencing shall be installed as shown on the Landscape Plan (Sheets L-I, L-2, and L-3), dated 10/6/03. Please submit three copies of the revised landscape plan to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to signature on the final plat. All fencing shall be reduced to three feet in height within twenty feet of the right-of-way. 4. Revise the Landscape Plan as follows: a. "Paper birch" trees are listed as a non-permitted tree per the Tree Selection Guide. Replace with allowed species. b. Revise the container size of the "Goldflame Spirea" to 2 gallon per MCC. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 2 OF 5 (' Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 3 ( Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, drainage lots constructed, fencing installed, and road base approved by the Ada County Highway District prior to applying for building permits. All development improvements, including perimeter fencing, irrigation, and landscaping shall be installed and approved prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all fencing, landscaping, pressurized irrigation, amenities, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 5. Sanitary sewer service and municipal water to this site shall be via extensions from existing mains. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer and water mains to and through this proposed development, thereby making them available to adjacent properties. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Applicant shall execute City of Meridian standard forms of easements, for any mains that are required to provide service. 6. Complete the Certificate of Owners and accompanying Acknowledgment pnor to signature on the final plat. 7. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to signature on the final plat per Resolution 02-374. 8. Revise or add the following notes to the face of the plat: (1.) Revise note to read: "Building setbacks and dimensional standards In this subdivision shall be in compliance with Conditional Use Permit (CUP-03-028)." (7.) Delete note (No longer required as a note on the face of the plat). (12.) Complete Instrument Number. (13.) Complete Instrument Number. Add note: Anv drainage areas (detention/retention basins) must be designed to ensure that water will ?ercolate or discharge within a period of time not to exceed 24 hours for all storms up to and including a 100-year storm event. 9. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 10. Applicant shall be required to install a temporary turn-around on the south end of N. Chimney Peak Avenue. 11. Graphically depict eight (8) foot wide public utilities, drainage, and irrigation easements EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 3 OF5 " { ~ Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 4 (/ on the west side of Lot 17, Block 1, Lot 5, Block 2, Lot 2, 10, and 21, Block 4, and the ease side of Lot 8, Block 2, and the south side of Lot 2, Block 6. The extra width is required due to the location of pressurized irrigation mainlines. 12. Complete the CP&F filing numbers on the face of the plat. 13. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or terms of the approved preliminary plat or conditional use permit does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. All irrigation ditches, laterals or canals, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or lying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association ( ditch owners), with written approval or non-approval submitted to the Public Works Department. If lateral users association approval can't be obtained, plans will be reviewed and approved by the meridian City Engineer prior to final plat signature 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3. Two-hundred-fifty and IOO-watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. Final design locations and quantity are determined after power designs are completed by Idaho Power Company. The street light contractor shall obtain design and permit from the Public Works Department prior commencing installations. 4. Compaction test results must be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 5 Applicant's engineer will be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian's Water Works Superintendent. 7. Any tree over 4" in caliper that is removed from the property shall be replaced by installing additional trees, being the equivalent number of caliper inches of trees that were removed. Required landscaping trees will not be considered as replacement trees for those trees that have to be removed. EXHmIT "A" PAGE 4 OF 5 ~(- . (+- l Planning & Zoning Commission/Mayor & City Council Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 Page 5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Kelly Creek Subdivision No. 1 with the above stated comments and conditions. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE50F5 ( Interoffice Memorandum R Er' 4: f;'-~~ Pl:r',,\ }~.~f~:il rt~, J:,_ ~I ). _~~ '; ;: ~ 1& '._ ;. i ,~ ~ _f .,.!g-~",--.;J; ~.'i_ [ ," ,t'- i~O\1 7 f! ~,~ < 1i - u L <.r... t..;' To: William G. Berg, Jr. {-._: :i ,:/ () f l"i If en"l' -'. _ . '- . ,V.1.'Ld., L _ , 1_~lt)1 Clerk ()f'i- Prom: Wm. F. Nichols Subject: Drawbridge Subdivision - Final Plat Time Extension (TE-03~d07) Date: November 20, 2003 Will: Please find enclosed the original of the Order Granting A One (1) Year Time Extension for the final plat in the above matter. This Order is pursuant to the timely request of the applicant, Pinnacle Engineers, Inc., and pursuant to the City Council's action at its November 18, 2003, meeting. Therefore, please present this Order to Mayor Corrie to obtain his signature. Please forward copies to the applicant, Planning and Zoning, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you have any questions please advise. z:\ Work\M\Meridian\Meridian I 5360M\Drawbridge Sub FP Extension TE 03 007\Clk TE Memo II 20 03.doc ( BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) FOR EXTENSION ON FINAL PLAT FOR ) DRAWBRIDGE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ) WEST OF NORTH TEN MILE ROAD AND ) SOUTH OF WEST McMILLAN ROAD, ) MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) ) BY: PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., ) ) APPLICANT ) ) ) C/C 11-18-03 CASE NO. TE-03-007 ORDER GRANTING A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL PLAT This matter coming on regularly before the City Council on the 18th day of November, 2003, upon the Applicant's time application for a one (1) year extension for filing the final plat, which preliminary plat was originally approved on December 17, 2002, as provided in 9 12-3-6 B, and good cause appearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER THAT: 1. The above named Applicant is granted a one (1) year extended period of time until December 1, 2004, of this Order for the filing of the final plat for the above entitled subdivision application. 'I ofh By action of the City Council at its regular meeting on the D day of IV fNe4VL~ , 2003. Order Granting A One (1) Year Time Extension For Final Plat - Drawbridge Subdivision (TE-03-007) Page 1 of2 DATED this /gf!;. day of ;kc/e;hv~ , 2003. .__" _ u_.._.. ___________'-) Attest: SEAL & - "CE5 0 g ~ 0 15\ I t~~.$ .........,> ~ A. \.9 { .",,:-"'''' /."/ \.~~ D.~ ,.... ~-r.....l ~', //.'.:,_. ".'., "'oj t ~ ' .:....,. BY: .JIdfh~ City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zonin2:J?rr,l?artment, Public Works and the City A \\\\t"f it/II ttomey. .\\\\\ Of Ist1E,r::.. /111; ........ .~.J -I iil)J 1/ ....' :"\" ~~ ....,.,. .::-" c} X\POR '1'" ~/ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ 0 ~ ~ S~~d: ~ ;J-tJ - () 3 7. ~ ~ Q)O.:: -;.. ~ Qu ~ 0::: ~'O 'Sr 151 · ~.. ':'"::- -'/ ':A ~"'... .~ // - 1 (\ \.<;) '( .>. //1 .... n; ',/\ r~'.f \-'< <." / I, .... ! - . ,~~ 5 f ~ ~ . . .. .'. Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 1 5360M\Drawbridge Sub FP Extension TE 03 007\FP Time Extension TE-03~007.doc Order Granting A One (1) Year Time Extension For Final Plat - Drawbridge Subdivision (TE-03-007) Page 2 of2 November 14, 2003 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT November 18, 2003 ITEM NO. J,~ REQUEST Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: CITY PARKS DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: OTHER: lj~ yJJ Contacted: Emailed: Date: Staff Initials: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. t-- MeIl10randtun C:)::;:;ZIt;;~~~~.:~.....~~;t:':-'l-f~:-;;~:;Z~~~;:~~.:~~1":~~:_~-,;~.:~~-;;;*.;:;t,;;~~::~:;:;:~::.:z.i~.~~~~:~-h:.m To: Mayor & Council :RECEIVED NOV 1 8 2003 CITY OF MERIDIAN cc: Will Berg, City Clerk Stacy Kilchenmann, Finance Director Rick Clinton, Water Superintendent File From: Leslie Howard, MUBS Date: 11/18/2003 Re: Turn off Day Due -to an error at Billing Document Specialist, the company that prints our bills, we have q.ecided to postpone turn off day until December 3, 2003. BDS inadvertently put Thursday November 20, 2003 as the date the past due amount was to be paid. Since next week is Thanksgiving week, we have decided that postponing turn off until the following week would be best for all parties involved. , ~' , ...i.) ....i Stephanie Turner From: Sent: To: Subject: Billing Document Specialists [BDS@VIEWNET.com] Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:56 PM Stephanie Turner RE: Meridian Utility Bills for Nov. Revised received 15807 accounts. thanks, Traci -----Original Message----- From: Stephanie Turner [mailto:turners@meridiancity.org] Sent: Tuesday, November. 04, 2003 1:46 PM To: Billing Document Specialists Subject: Meridian Utility Bills for Nov. Revised t"w~;' ~n~~P~1t~.;.E~iiilil~tifft(;Zt1flijlfrtH~f~~\1ft1ffSa e~~tW6~{I;iMf Here is the message that needs to appear a the bottom of the bill for November also: To accommodate growth in the number of utility accounts the City of Meridian is going to to institute two monthly billing cycles. Residents who live north of Cherry Lane will be on a billing cycle that ends the 20th of every month. Residents who live south of Cherry lane will be on a cycle that ends the 5th of every month. The split billing cycle will take place this November. As a result of the change residents living north of Cherry lane will receive two statements in November. This will only happen in November. If you have any questions please call 888-4439. Thank you, Stephanie <<stmt.txt>> 1 ,., I (,. f.-.- CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, ID 83642 ( ACCOUNT NO.: 17.33.2566.2 65.18 75.03 140 21 · ADDRESSE~ CURRENT AMOUNT DUE BY: 11/17/03 * AMOUNT PAST DUE (See Note Below) TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: > . REMIT TO: . - > 9221 **************5~DIGIT SCH 83642 11..1...11..11.,.1..1,.1.1.1..1.1..1111.. ...11,.1,'".1"'1 f." .~ J -m HAWK ST MERIDIAN 10 83642-4401 J '111,,1 J '..1 , 11.1. .1111.1..1.'.1'," .11'1..11..11.. .11.'.'..1 CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVENUE MERIDIAN 10 83642-2631 DYes, please apply my rounded payment as a donation to Pennies for Parks. PLEASE DETACH AND RETURN TOP PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT 529 SITE LOCA nON 721 HAWK ST E Account # . 17 . 33. 2566.2 . " > f~~;/. ~ : ,'< ;:-1;,17r!:~::~7t";V~~~~'<~ ---- " ' : :,:':: . ::, .,;,;-;i~f:,tt~l~~~i~rli"~ J E~ CURRENT AMOUNT DUE BY: ~T"LI' U---:- : .' C", . ,-,", ,J;--,\"(.,.,',f"",';,;:",cG" ,~, MERIDIAN ID ,,83642:;,#~,L~;~(i'::;;~;;:?t~~!.;,i~~~~~~,ft~1~~\ "~ PASTDUE AMOUNT DUE BY: , . ' ,:;::':-::-:>':'/-::,}i~~~!':~~~~11'1~~~;~i;;~;~OUNT DUE 11-17-03 65 . 18 75.03 140.21 11-20...03 ,~------ .-... -.------. ----. ----'---NOTE-:----------- ____no .n.. . . - - -------- -. ._________... ..n_ , . Any PASTDUE AMOUNT will result in discontinuance of service and penalty unless payment is received before 4:00 p.m. on PASTDUE date shown. Please disregard PASTDUE date if there is no past due amount showing. .' ' _ ;.-.':.;;}{~l:~~~~t~,~~~l.i;l~~~i . , ......... /I~:' . ~ . -... .. To accommodate growthJn,the nUl11b~r of utility accounts, the City of Meridian ,is going toir1Stitute'~iWo montl1lyb,i[liJlg .~c1~s. Residents. who .live riorthj>fcljerly La:r1~(t,wmbe o.ri ~i,:-~,~~!~t19.J9f~'~~~~~;~~9-d~J.~~~ :*Q~:ti19!~e"E!--,"Y:~!'~,~~~., '~e~!~en~.J,;~h~. ~ I~~~ - ~o~~~t~f.,Ch~rry LaQ~.,,,,,,,ill.l),e,f~,f1'i:J.~cJ,~: W~!:e~d~~~i,~hE!~th Q~~.very. m,o~~h..,; rh~, :~~~~~. nl)~llmg ;9'fJ~ Will __, ~,k~ ~pJ~~. ~i~,::~o.v.;e:~~~r~>A;s ar~~~lt 'of .the change, re.~ld~",~"i'iYI_1;19i;~~.~ :9,fi:~~erry ,.' Lane-will. r~&ivEftW() sta,tements in November~_ r~iswiU only~happen'~ill.Noveniljer.' " ' ','.' '>-r -- ..:~,::-,~~~~,;:/ '. __" ;-.",. . ,:.'., - ; ,-, , '".,' , . '-' . : -. - .::':: .' , Plea$e~.:nQ-t~'~at:yo.ur a~ unt nuntber has beenchanged~ If yo u use a bill paying service, , } """~ .'''' .~ . ,-", ~A -., ~ ~ "':" ;-,..~. ' " .' , .' : "~ . . . '. . pl~~,s'~:lio~f;Yf~,e,91 ~~Iso pt ,thi~ cha,nge on your ~,ccount. _ ' ' ': - .; . ,;. ': .: ' : c , ,.," ~ . '1,;: . :. . ' . . ' . CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. Idaho Avenue Meridian, 10 83642 PHONE: (208)888-4439 0009381 .. ~ I L J ,> r .. ,<'e~;~'~~ ' , \ -. ~ l ~ r: I ~ ~~ ~- ~ .,::/.:t~.~. '~;'- '." :'. , .: .. ~ ~ +-~ ...1-. , ,"'Mail To:' 244 SPICEWOOD DR W MERIDIAN ID 83642 ... .. ~ __ t -~ ~!~mQootmnaQfetu! ~,:~:~::~:;;:~;~m~~}~~<<:'Jf~~l~~~~~ft~~~ iJ~~~Q)jijfll~)~.i!i.lj:~i1~J i~1!~l~g~~m9imt?~ ;~J(mtAy~1)~tJ~~ -- :244 -sP :GE\^/OOD b ~ 'it -;- 1 6 .<32:~O~7Q.4 .- -94.1 4--, .-. ~ - - 1 1 /1 7/2Q03 -- # .. ~.... ~ ~ -. .. ~ ~... + ... -.. .. . .. .. ~ .... ~ ~. - .. ...4.. ~. Dear Customer, We're concerned. Accordin~ to our records, we have not yet received payment for your water, ~ewer and trash bill which was due 10/1 /2003 . Under our rules and regulations as approved by the Meridian City Council, water bills shall be consiqered late ten days after the bill date. Have you already sent us your payment? If so, please accept our thanks and disregard this reminder. If you have not yet sent in your payment, please do so by return mail, pay in person at City Hall located at 33 E. Idaho Ave., Meridian, or place your payment in our night deposit box located by the front doors of City Hall. Payment must be received prior to the close of business on the final due date printed at the top of this notice. We will make every effort to work with you to set up payment arrangements if you are unable to pay the fuU amount owed. However, if you have not made payment arrangements or paid your bill by the final date printed at the top of this notice, your water service will be disconnected for non-payment. If your water service is terminated, an additional $30.00 reconnection fee will be required to restore service. If disconnecting your ,water service would adversely affect a serious illness or create a medical emergency for someone in your home, you may give us a statement from your doctor confi!ming this and we will postpone shutting off your water service for 30 days. If you dispute the bill, or the termination of water service, you may argue on your behaif at a pretermination hearing before the Mayor and City Council on the 3rd Tuesday of the month at 6:30 p.m. You are hereby informed that you may appeal this notice with the Fourth Judicial Court, Pursuant to Idaho Code 67-5201. Your water service will not be reinstated by the appeal process alone. We would be happy to discuss your account with you. Please feel free to contact us. Customer Service: (208) 888-4439 Hours: Monday - Friday 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.~. f"' \': The tear-'of{P9rtion of this reriililder should -be '~,cluded with -your paymen~ {~'the envelo~'-pr~yide'd'. 'Thank Y01:l for your prompt 'attention to this past due water bIll. -: ' ;:" -" ~ - .:~ '.. >, · :,.. --' I _J~ ~~~ 1'1/06/2003 16.32.0970.4 :~ I~"'; - 1~~-~-' '_~ ;:-: 244 -SPICEWOOD. DR '" . ~~~~~~;~e ~~~~~~~)!W~~~a; ~~ ~. _ r- -; _~ - - I I ~ I -. -, ~ ~- t -' )' - j -- ( DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 3, 2003 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you so choose, that you have the right to a pre-termination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, November 18,2003, before the Mayor and City Council, to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on December 3, 2003 unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (No response.) MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $66,423.83. CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18,2003 10:17am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No = {<} 880000001 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non~Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 30.74.2744.1 ABBOTT, KEVIN & SHAWNA 129.85 55.68 74.17 10/14/2003 78.09 - 24.04.1904.1 ABBOTT, SCOTT 152.33 72.34 79.99 09/24/2003 77.05 - 18.42.2992.4 ABLEMAN, DOUG & ANGELA 99.03 54.26 44.77 09/12/2003 95.42 - 22.51.3138.2 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DIST. 42.94 41.96 .98 10/20/2003 46.73 - 30.74.2668.1 ADAMS,CATHY 122.78 55.10 67.68 10/20/2003 75.52 - 23.02.2714.3 ADAMS, ROY & STACY 314.94 47.10 102.42 75.36 90.06 07/28/2003 70.46 - 23.02.2250.2 ADAMSON, DEBBY 96.88 61.52 35.36 10/20/2003 100.00 - 22.51.3074.2 ADHD C\O AMC 132.77 121.01 11.76 1 0/20/2003 167.79 - 34.34.5036.1 ALBERTSONS EMPLOYEES FEC 41.45 11.31 18.83 11.31 8.08.0116.2 ALCORN, JEFFREY 270.48 115.42 155.06 09/10/2003 85.48 - 30.74.1044.1 ALDRICH, STEVE 77.63 25.55 26.53 25.55 08/08/2003 27.51 - 22.50.0244.1 ALGER,BRENT 93.28 39.38 26.95 26.95 09/11/2003 77.91 - 30.74.2452.1 ALLEN, RICHARD L. 130.94 58.20 72.74 10/20/2003 73.72 - 16.31.3422.1 ALLEN, SEDENA 91.17 90.58 .59 11/17/2003 66.00 - 35.35.0194.4 ALLMOND, JOSEPH & TAKEIA 60.12 43.50 16.62 11/17/2003 45.00 - 17.34.2730.1 ALVEREZ, ROSALlO 159.09 102.88 56.21 10/03/2003 63.07 - 15.21.1784.1 ANDERSEN,SHARRON 165.76 117.36 48.40 10/20/2003 100.00 - 23.02.0860.1 ANDERSON, DEAN 77.57 36.40 41.17 10/17/2003 42.15 - 30.74.1026.1 ANDERSON, DOUGLAS 72.64 34.44 34.31 3.89 08/19/2003 37.27 - 17.34.1102.3 ANDERSON, LADELL 135.1 0 92.22 42.88 10/20/2003 60.00 - 15.22.1482.1 ANDERSON, LYLE D. 196.50 119.02 77.48 10/21/2003 78.46 - 14.19.0068.2 ANDERSON, SKIP & JULIE 167.60 111 .84 55.76 10/02/2003 53.80 - 24.03.0840.1 ANDERSON, VICKY 35.48 34.92 .56 11/06/2003 35.00 - 30.74.2432.2 ANDREWS, MICHAEL 110.66 51.98 58.68 11/17/2003 51.82 - 25.25.4010.2 ANGSTMAN, T.J. 270.84 37.38 38.23 38.23 157.00 10/21/2003 28.23 - 23.02.6300.1 ANSON, PATRICIA 119.39 53.56 65.83 1 0/27/2003 25.00 - 22.51.1138.2 ARANA & R.C. LAND COMPANY 112.85 112.85 15.15.0516.2 ARCHIBALD, BEN & JAMIE 126.88 81.10 45.78 10/21/2003 38.92 - 15.21.0092.1 ARCHIBALD, JACKIE 98.18 65.74 32.22 .22 09/16/2003 32.22 - 35.35.0099.2 AREVALO, MICHAEL 63.19 31.66 31.53 10/20/2003 34.47 - 18.42.1988.2 ARMSTRONG, GARY & LAURA 145.04 79.58 63.23 2.23 11/17/2003 65.50 - 36.68.0040.1 ARMSTRONG, LANCE 64.19 64.10 .09 1 0/28/2003 69.00 - 15.21.1708.1 ARTE, MICHELLE & RICK 186.52 124.58 61.94 1 0/27/2003 78.00 - 15.21.2708.4 ASAY, ALAN & JULIE 197.50 118.38 79.12 10/22/2003 81.08 ~ 17.34.1952.1 ASEGUINOLAZA, MARIA 130.1 3 77.04 53.09 10/03/2003 58.97 - 20.47.1226.1 ASPEN HOMES 64.84 23.04 24.33 17.47 08/26/2003 21.39 - 30.74.2938.5 ASSET PRESERVATON INC 190.48 49.22 141 .26 10/09/2003 100.00 - 36.69.0530.1 ATCHISON, JEFFERY 122.12 74.28 47.84 10/17/2003 204.1 0 - 22.51.3370.1 ATWOOD, CINDI 44.49 35.58 8.91 10/17/2003 80.00 - 22.51.0180.1 B M C, WEST 33.93 11.31 11.31 11.31 08/21/2003 52.76 - 20.46.4784.1 BABIES R US 92.73 91.75 .98 36.69.1620.1 BACHMAN, MICHAEL L. 61.39 61.39 10/20/2003 93.32 ~ 30.74.2524.2 BADGLEY, RUSSELL & SARAH 171 .99 78.22 93.77 1 0/22/2003 70.25 - 13.13.8434.2 BAGLEY, ADAM 56.57 55.80 .77 10/28/2003 27.00 - 23.02.3550.2 BAILEY, PEGGY 143.83 44.08 41.99 45.91 11.85 09/16/2003 50.00 - 36.69.1578.1 BAIN, JOHN 51.10 24.57 26.53 09/24/2003 29.4 7 - 16.32.0878.1 BALL, WILLIAM 102.54 102.52 .02 10/29/2003 72.67 - 15.21.0560.2 BARBEE, JASON & FAIN STEPH. 130.34 86.02 44.32 10/20/2003 46.28 - 29.07.0766.2 BARBER, CURTIS 16.97 16.97 09/15/2003 68.04 - 18.42.2300.2 BARBEY, THOMES & BARBARA 110.79 71.90 38.89 23.01.2790.3 BARINSKY, CYNTHIA 120.68 47.58 57.22 15.88 10/21/2003 58.00 - ""** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent . CITY OF 'MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:18am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 18.43.0424.2 BARNES, CHRISTINA 85.31 45.44 39.87 09/12/2003 37.91 - 7.40.0432.2 BARNES. DAVID 92.22 89.28 2.94 10/17/2003 88.96 - 15.21.1894.1 BARNHART, CLINTON 177.98 97.76 80.22 10/22/2003 100.00 - 18.43.2448.2 BARON, KONA & MICHELLE 120.61 67.50 53.11 10/20/2003 54.09 - 15.22.2534.2 BATIS, SHAWN & ANGIE 115.93 77.70 38.23 1 % 1/2003 38.23 - 23.02.2470.1 BAUGES, EDWARD L 53.51 51.32 2.19 11/06/2003 45.00 - 30.74.2716.1 BAUGH, JAMES OR NANCY BEt- 70.10 42.68 27.42 1 0/21/2003 50.00 - 23.23.1000.1 BAUMGART CONSTRUCTION IN 222.83 48.31 97.19 48.31 29.02 22.50.1022.1 BEACH, ARTHUR 123.50 63.36 60.14 07/31/2003 182.62 - 14.14.5010.2 BEAUCANNON, JUSTIN 91.31 87.32 3.99 1 0/28/2003 45.00 - 25.25.4040.2 BEDOYA,PEDRO 113.20 42.94 43.79 26.4 7 08/18/2003 100.00 - 23.01.1520.3 BEEBE, JEFF 210.31 90.89 119.42 09/17/2003 192.56 - 16.32.1076.2 BEESON, LORRAINE 143.35 78.34 65.01 10/03/2003 92.93 - 17.33.2316.1 BELL, LILLY 181 .40 181.26 .14 11/17/2003 118.00 - 17.34.1902.3 BENGOECHEA, MIKE 180.25 1 03.52 76.73 09/17/2003 105.22 - 20.46.0836.2 BENNETT, GREG 77.13 43.80 33.33 09/23/2003 40.73 - 14.19.6688.1 BENNETT. MASON 168.52 120.92 47.60 10/22/2003 83.00 - 16.32.0922.3 BENSON, DOUG & SANDRA 153.67 90.12 63.55 10/20/2003 83.15 - 18.42.1798.1 BETTENCOURT, RICHARD 109.49 59.00 50.49 10/21/2003 53.04 - 14.14.3004.2 BEWLEY, SANDRA & DAVID 157.78 94.84 62.94 10/21/2003 62.94 - 23.02.0452.1 BIERY, DARA LYNN 118.08 46.90 71.18 10/20/2003 81.96 - 21.21.9056.1 BIG RIVER 35.18 31.70 3.48 09/12/2003 5.44 - 21.21.9050.1 BIG RIVER 54.96 47.72 7.24 09/12/2003 4.46 - 14.20.1494.1 BIRD, RODNEY & MICHELL 290.24 189.68 100.56 10/03/2003 98.60 - 15.22.1342.2 BISIG, JOSEPH W 160.72 103.66 57.06 10/17/2003 59.02 - 24.04.1834.1 BITONI, MARK 155.48 73.90 81.58 1 0/09/2003 88.44 - 14.19.0192.1 BITTON, GREG 110.72 73.92 36.80 1 0/03/2003 38.76 - 23.02.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 104.10 45.46 58.64 10/08/2003 60.00 - 23.02.0446.4 BOBKO, RAYMOND 149.56 79.76 69.80 10/14/2003 30.00 - 22.50.1726.2 BOESIGER, MAX 111.02 44.78 37.25 28.99 1 % 7/2003 40.00 - 30.74.2482.1 BOGDANSKI, DONALD 89.62 41.86 47.76 10/21/2003 51.00 - 16.31.0512.1 BOKMAN, HELEN 157.39 105.82 51.57 10/21/2003 60.00 - 15.21.2794.3 BOMER, MICHAEL 131.48 97.46 34.02 09/16/2003 62.14 - 37.72.0164.1 BON FRISCO, LOUIE & JENNELL 190.46 71.30 119.16 10/21/2003 1 20.14 - 17.34.1318.2 BOOHER. CRAIG & DANA 243.39 122.80 120.07 .52 11/12/2003 71.00 - 20.46.0468.1 BORCHARDT, KEVIN & TINA 105.89 60.14 45.75 10/21/2003 43.79 - 18.42.3036.1 BOSIO. LAWRENCE 107.68 59.56 48.12 10/21/2003 50.00 - 30.74.0660.2 BOSSART-HILL. CANDACE 56.56 32.38 24.18 11/14/2003 1 0.00 - 17.34.1880.2 SOUR, SHANNON 179.92 123.52 56.40 1 0/22/2003 70.00 - 22.51.4310.1 BOWER INVESTMENTS, LLP 47.26 7.55 7.55 7.55 24.61 05/08/2003 98.27 - 22.51.4250.1 BOWER ST. PROPERTIES, L.L.C 1,068.90 118.80 196.11 189.19 564.80 07/18/2003 26.32 - 15.21.3068.1 BOYDSTUN. PATRICK & JUDY 174.73 107.10 67.63 10/21/2003 103.51 - 22.51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI 63.16 42.12 21.04 10/21/2003 60.00 - 16.31.3022.3 BREEDLOVE, RUSSELL & MICHl 187.42 187.42 05/02/2003 60.03 - 30.74.3974.2 BREEN, RICHARD 62.42 56.24 6.18 10/17/2003 45.00 - 17.34.0420.1 BRENEMAN, JEFFERY 234.73 128.28 106.45 10/22/2003 100.95 - 23.01.0800.1 BREWER, SID & SHELL Y 95.81 62.48 33.33 10/22/2003 64.31 - 15.22.2282.2 BRICE, DAVID 93.06 62.80 30.26 09/16/2003 61.50 - 10.10.1002.1 BRIDGETOWER DENTAL 216.99 146.50 70.49 09/16/2003 74.25 - 16.32.0926.1 BRIGGS, NADINE 205.06 132.28 72.78 11/06/2003 100.00 - 16.31.2306.1 BRIGHT, LEANN 86.66 83.38 3.28 10/17/2003 62.00 - 14.19.1216.1 BRIGHTON HOMES 52.67 35.20 17.47 1 0/21/2003 17.47 - 14.19.1676.1 BRIGHTON HOMES 38.68 35.20 3.48 11/1 0/2003 7.16 - 14.19.1588.1 BRIGHTON HOMES 43.88 35.20 8.68 10/21/2003 8.79 - 23.01.3510.4 BRINEGAR, E. E. 56.57 42.12 14.45 10/20/2003 50.00 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent 1It-'"".- ...1. .~ CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18,2003 10:18am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 23.02.1310.5 BRINEGAR, E.E. 76.90 41.74 35.16 10/07/2003 43.00 - 23.02.1290.5 BRINEGAR. E.E. 109.4 7 57.52 51.95 09/22/2003 54.89 - 6.06.1504.2 BROSKI, MICHAEL & TINA 84.93 56.62 28.31 09/25/2003 58.58 - 22.50.2434.1 BROWN, BRIAN 192.91 99.62 86.18 7.11 1 0/21/2003 87.00 - 25.25.0168.2 BROWN, DENISE 107.42 51.34 56.08 10/02/2003 62.94 - 36.69.0574.1 BROWN, JAMES & SHERRY 131.68 60.26 71.42 10/21/2003 90.00 - 30.74.3264.1 BROWN, MICHAEL & LISA 102.52 55.26 47.26 09/12/2003 56.28 - 15.21.1658.2 BROWNlEE, DEANN 426.69 226.67 200.02 09/11/2003 80.24 - 18.42.3072.1 BROZOVICH, MARC 57.51 32.52 24.99 09/15/2003 49.00 - 18.42.1822.1 BRUCE, BITTON 87.04 48.28 38.76 10/03/2003 40.72 - 32.32.4944.2 BRUEGGEMANN, DALE & JANIC 51.75 25.94 25.81 10/07/2003 25.81 - 16.32.0732.2 BRUNGER, DWAYNE & LINDA 185.41 114.44 70.97 10/21/2003 100.00 - 35.64.0048.2 BRUSSE, N CHAD 60.57 30.84 29.73 09/16/2003 59.46 - 14.19.0560.2 BRYANT, LESLIE 179.36 118.70 60.66 10/21/2003 59.68 - 15.21.0510.2 BUNCH, NANCY 262.66 150.06 112.60 10/14/2003 108.68 - 14. 14.3556.2 BURCHFIELD ENT 159.82 96.78 63.04 10/20/2003 97.06 - 14.19.6498.5 BURCHFIELD. DARRELL 158.98 97.92 49.75 11.31 10/03/2003 45.30 - 14.19.7150.2 BURCHFIELD. DARRELL 103.03 76.20 26.83 10/17/2003 40.00 - 16.32.1546.6 BURCHFIELD. DARRELL 181.32 121.64 59.68 09/24/2003 57.72 - 16.31.0720.2 BURKE, MARY 116.91 76.72 40.19 09/16/2003 44.11 - 17.33.2264.2 BURNS, E. GALE 77.67 52.52 25.15 10/06/2003 26.13 - 17.34.1528.1 BURTON,RYAN 175.68 98.56 34.15 42.97 08/13/2003 83.98 - 15.22.2262.2 BYERS,STEVEN 120.52 78.82 41.70 10/03/2003 75.62 - 36.68.0232.2 BYINGTON, ALEX & HEIDI 95.23 45.72 49.51 10/20/2003 48.53 - 24.03.0832:3 BYRUM, DARYL 104.59 52.88 51.71 22.50.0728.1 C.F.1. INVESTMENTS 51.97 34.32 17.65 10/01/2003 40.83 - 36.65.3136.2 CABRAL, JOE & JAMIE 1 04.71 50.46 54.25 10/21/2003 51.31 - 30.74.2722.5 CAFFERTY, LORI 168.36 68.04 39.87 51.63 8.82 08/08/2003 90.52 - 20.47.0046.1 CAHILL, JON 81.05 44.78 36.27 09/11/2003 71.56 - 30.74.0402.1 CALLAWAY, LAUREL 107.95 43.26 64.69 09/09/2003 130.36 - 10.10.1050.2 CALLISON, AUSTIN & DANYELU 91.89 62.98 28.91 10/17/2003 31.85 - 21.21.9172.2 CALLISTER, DAVID & REBECCA 144.78 66.02 41.83 36.93 21.21.9170.2 CALLISTER. DAVID & REBECCA 126.16 47.40 39.87 38.89 15.21.0522.1 CALWELL, MARC 113.07 76.86 36.21 1 0/21/2003 40.00 - 14.19.7158.2 CAMPBELL, BENJAMIN 108.09 72.80 35.29 1 0/03/2003 36.27 - 18.42.0258.1 CAPITOL CHRISTIAN CENTER 4,189.04 1 ,289.49 1,237.22 1,662.33 10/17/2003 714.08 - 18.42.0260.1 CAPITOL CHRISTIAN CENTER 553.52 181 .45 372.07 1 0/30/2003 175.00 - 35.35.5040.2 CAPLES. JEFF & HONSOOK 80.53 39.84 40.69 09/16/2003 39.71 - 24.04.1796.1 CAPRAI, JOHN & SARAH 198.92 102.48 96.44 09/15/2003 242.86 - 24.04.1842.3 CARLSEN, PAUL & CHRISTINE 67.52 63.60 3.92 11/06/2003 71.28 - 16.32.0884.1 CARLSON, DEBORAH J. 175.23 1 06.78 68.45 1 0/20/2003 60.61 - 14.20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA 81.78 79.00 2.78 1 0/28/2003 51.13 - 23.02.4590.1 CARNAHAN, JOHN 83.35 42.26 41.09 09/16/2003 91.98 - 18.42.4032.2 CARPENTER. BRIAN 113.52 64.46 49.06 1 0/22/2003 52.04 - 17.34.1808.2 CARPENTER, DOUGLAS 145.52 90.26 55.26 1 0/22/2003 64.08 - 24.04.2166.2 CARPENTER, SEAN 315.99 315.99 01/22/2003 143.88 - 17.34.0942.3 CARR, ERIC & MCGEE SARA 238.07 121.16 116.91 09/17/2003 208.12 - 23.02.4340.1 CARRIER, RICHARD 123.33 55.36 67.97 10/21/2003 58.17 - 15.21.3130.2 CARSTENSEN, LUCINDA 253.46 188.26 49.38 15.82 11/06/2003 30.00 - 36.69.1122.2 CARTER, J.R. 108.70 58.70 50.00 10/14/2003 60.92 - 15.22.2164.2 CARTNER, RICHARD 98.77 66.26 32.51 09/25/2003 31.53 - 35.65.0608.2 CARVALLO. TERI 104.79 39.18 65.61 1 % 1/2003 SO.OO - 22.50.0310.2 CASS, BRUCE C 100.65 52.62 48.03 10/21/2003 51 .95 - 24.03.0850.2 CAST, PETER & VERIONICA 90.42 40.88 49.54 10/02/2003 137.90 - 16.32.0446.1 CAVINESS. WILLIAM A. 182.76 113.78 68.98 10/21/2003 68.98 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent { ( CITY OF'MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List~ council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers Nav 18,2003 10:19am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 22.50.3726.2 CHANDLER, NICKlE 138.59 73.06 65.53 09/12/2003 162.42 - 15.22.0848.1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 237.16 153.64 83.52 10/22/2003 99.20 - 16.32.0986.1 CHATTERTON, KELLY 234.59 137.86 96.73 10/21/2003 102.61 - 30.74.2850.1 CHEESBROUGH, JAMES G. 95.34 48.24 47.10 09/23/2003 47.10- 30.74.3676.4 CHENEY, STEVEN 62.58 31.66 30.92 10/17/2003 55.00 - 23.02.4700.2 CHENEY, STEVEN 120.97 73.10 47.87 10/22/2003 36.38 - 15.15.0047.2 CHRISTENSEN, DAVID 149.46 99.42 50.04 10/20/2003 99.1 0 - 22.51.1168.3 CHRISTIANSON, ARTHUR & COI 75.30 75.30 14.20.1606.3 CHRISWELL, LEE ANNA 232.29 232.29 02/05/2003 111.51 - 22.51.0463.1 CITY - MERIDIAN PARKS 1 0.44 3.48 3.48 3.48 14.19.0958.1 CLARE, TIMOTHY 80.78 79.80 .98 11/06/2003 38.76 - 16.31.0790.3 CLARK, DONN 121.33 110.06 11.27 11/12/2003 50.00 - 7.40.0094.1 CLARK, RICKY 117.89 75.74 42.15 09/16/2003 75.48 - 20.46.0284.1 CLARK, TROY 79.20 43.38 35.82 10/20/2003 36.80 - 22.51.0690.2 CLAY, GREG 124.97 62.06 62.91 09/15/2003 118.96- 18.42.2376.3 CLAY, STEVEN & SUSAN 139.15 101.82 37.33 10/20/2003 200.00 - 15.21.2214.4 CLEVELAND, RICHARD & KAREl 203.72 98.56 35.13 70.03 09/04/2003 109.08 - 22.50.4570.1 CLEVENGER, TERRY 66.01 36.28 29.73 09/23/2003 29.73 - 13.13.5018.2 CL YNE, STEVEN & BRENDA 132.74 73.78 39.21 19.75 09/16/2003 58.74 - 15.21.2892.1 COIL, KEVIN 182.38 147.78 34.60 1 0/08/2003 100.00 - 17.33.3752.2 COLBERT,NATHAN 129.1 7 87.18 41.99 10/20/2003 70.03 - 22.50.4478.1 COLEMAN, MICHAEL R. 45.97 45.92 .05 10/09/2003 35.40 - 16.31.0796.2 COLLINS, LINDA 106.94 106.78 .16 11/06/2003 79.00 - 22.51.4170.4 COLSON, HOWARD 64.80 21.36 21.23 22.21 08/12/2003 20.25 - 32.32.4114.2 CONCANNON, THOMAS JR & Lit 52.32 50.36 1.96 11/06/2003 47.26 - 17.33.2566.2 CONNELL, EDWARD 206.37 131.34 68.97 6.06 10/21/2003 70.00 - 17.34.1298.1 COONCE, ALLIE 175.25 1 06.14 69.11 09/12/2003 160.76 - 15.21.1524.2 COONES, JOSEPH 248.03 155.44 92.59 10/22/2003 91.61 - 15.22.1598.1 COOPER, DEBBRA K 154.34 98.10 56.24 10/14/2003 74.64 - 24.04.0882.1 COPELAND, STEPHAN & JACKIE 153.75 153.75 06/1 0/2003 56.93 - 17.33.2328.1 COPELAND, WILLIAM 167.60 113.80 53.80 1 % 1/2003 53.80 - 8.08.1000.1 COREY BARTON HOMES 52.72 42.72 10.00 1 0/21/2003 152.83 - 24.04.0120.2 CORONA, JUAN & VICTOR 97.31 84.22 13.09 10/27/2003 50.00 - 24.04.1746.1 COSGROVE. AMY 194.52 88.52 106.00 10/22/2003 83.84 - 16.31.3420.1 COUCH. JULIA 114.20 75.74 38.46 10/22/2003 42.00 - 22.51.4130.1 COUNTRY GLASS 257.60 101.45 115.61 40.54 11/14/2003 1 01 .45 - 35.35.0182.2 COVINO, MELODY 124.24 41.96 75.75 6.53 10/20/2003 50.00 - 24.04.1908.1 COX, THOMAS 202.48 93.48 109.00 09/11/2003 178.58 - 15.22.0960.2 CRANER, DON 331.78 203.98 127.80 10/21/2003 125.84 - 30.74.0100.2 CRAWFORD, SARAH 73.63 31.98 41.65 10/21/2003 36.75 - 22.50.0260.6 CRIPE, PHYLLIS 95.74 31.38 34.63 29.73 09/15/2003 35.61 - 16.32.0858.2 CROGHAN, PATRICK 92.74 92.72 .02 10/20/2003 132.62 - 18.42.4070.1 CROSS,ARBY 85.08 47.30 37.78 10/21/2003 37.78 - 36.69.0100.1 CROSSMAN, DEBBIE & WARREf 94.68 46.44 48.24 09/04/2003 83.74 - 15.21.1918.1 CULVER, JAMES 131 .80 85.36 46.44 10/21/2003 54.28 - 6.06.1930.1 CUPP, SHAD & BECKY 119.35 89.24 30.11 10/22/2003 80.23 - 23.02.5690.5 CURIEL, FABIOLA 113.47 43.08 69.41 .98 OS/28/2003 47.47 - 20.46.0120.2 CUSLlDGE, JOSEPH 97.07 54.26 42.81 09/16/2003 99.34 - 24.04.0686.2 DA ROSA, JULIE 119.75 58.96 60.79 10/20/2003 68.63 - 18.42.0434.1 DAHLGREN. SHIRLEY 56.53 30.56 25.97 10/21/2003 25.97 - 22.50.0284.3 DALE, MARK 187.93 60.14 127.79 10/20/2003 70.00 - 16.31.1678.1 D'AMBROSIO, BARBARA 106.57 73.66 32.91 10/21/2003 37.81 - 15.22.1084.2 DANA, JAMES & SHELLBY 237.18 146.14 91.04 09/12/2003 90.06 - 23.02.4330.1 DANNENHAUER.CHARLES 55.50 29.70 25.80 10/21/2003 50.00 - 18.42.0346.2 DARRON STOUT 111 .22 60.86 50.36 10/21/2003 65.06 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY O~ MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:19am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 37.37.4138.2 DAVIS, MARK & PAULA 99.58 50.36 49.22 09/16/2003 45.30 - 18.42.2288.3 DAVIS, RENEE 82.89 78.82 4.07 10/21/2003 61.46 - 18.42.0456.3 DAY, BARBARA 39.53 39.06 .47 10/28/2003 33.02 - 17.33.0282.1 DAY,ETHEL 94.35 63.64 30.71 09/16/2003 65.34 - 30.74.2542.1 DAYBELL, BRUCE & CARl 256.74 86.74 84.02 85.98 09/03/2003 87.94 - 35.35.1212.2 DAYLEY, MARK & KATHRYN 31.11 28.88 2.23 06/24/2003 50.00 - 14.14.4324.1 DBD INC. 129.20 85.36 43.84 10/21/2003 60.00 - 36.69.1356.2 DEBENHAM, BRETT 154.16 63.92 86.30 3.94 10/20/2003 100.00 - 15.21.3070.1 DECK, KIMBERLY 201.36 118.88 82.48 10/21/2003 105.00 - 10.10.1110.2 DELVA, EDWIDGE 56.44 47.62 8.82 10/21/2003 21 .23 - 23.01.0930.2 DENNEN, JEVON & HEATHER 110.19 69.18 41.01 10/23/2003 48.68 - 14.20.3034.1 DENNING, LORA 137.51 89.80 46.73 .98 10/13/2003 46.73 - 17.33.3566.2 DENNISON, CHARLES 90.08 40.76 20.25 20.25 8.82 08/19/2002 373.25 - 16.32.1098.2 DERRICK, ARTHUR J & LAURA t 159.03 99.90 59.13 10/07/2003 55.21 - 6.06.1320.2 DESILET, ANDY 151.21 105.34 45.87 10/0212003 68.29 - 23.02.1610.1 DESILET, DENICE 130.00 70.26 59.74 11/06/2003 50.00 - 16.31.0812.1 DICK, JERALD & AUDRIA 177.71 104.84 72.87 1 % 1/2003 70.17 - 17.33.2584.1 DIXON, COLETTE 154.69 96.68 58.01 09/16/2003 105.24 - 24.04.1554.1 DOLL, THOMAS 128.89 59.12 69.77 09/12/2003 1 57.18 - 15.21.0144.1 DOMKA, DEBBIE 89.15 63.78 25.37 1 0/21/2003 35.00 - 17.33.2612.6 DONALDSON, NEAL 147.24 107.38 39.86 10/22/2003 80.00 - 17.33.2594.2 DONALDSON, NEAL 97.52 97.46 .06 11/17/2003 49.00 - 24.03.0830.1 DONLON, KATHRYN 74.74 36.96 37.78 10/17/2003 39.74 - 15.21.1958.1 DOTY, CHRISTY L. 200.44 133.08 67.36 10/21/2003 104.22 - 30.74.1062.1 DOTY, PAULINE & RON 85.10 39.61 45.49 10/21/2003 45.49 - 24.04.2084.1 DOUTHIT, RONALD 164.94 77.16 87.78 10/03/2003 88.76 - 18.42.2272.2 DRANSFIELD, ROBERT 115.16 63.08 52.08 10/20/2003 60.00 - 24.04.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 156.02 56.24 81.56 18.22 09/16/2003 150.00 - 15.22.2418.2 DUFF, DEAN & LAURIE 11 6.60 76.86 39.74 09/16/2003 40.72 ~ 23.02.6970.1 DULHANTY, TAMARA 90.97 42.12 48.85 08/18/2003 278.22 - 14.14.5004.2 DUNCAN, JEFF & MONIQUE 182.4 7 182.47 01/17/2003 40.00 - 22.50.3810.1 DUNN, ANDREW 93.75 42.82 50.93 09/16/2003 49.99 - 25.25.1060.3 DUNSWORTH, BRAD & JODI 91.72 51.18 40.54 1 0/21/2003 80.00 - 24.04.1958.1 DUPLEX, HARRY 152.84 64.74 88.10 1 0/24/2003 79.94 - 36.68.0102.2 DURHAM,KYLE 89.70 30.42 59.28 09/17/2003 87.84 - 15.22.1418.2 EARLS, SCOTT & SHIRLEY 189.42 123.60 65.82 1 0/21/2003 80.00 - 18.42.2598.2 EASTBURN,GARY 150.44 79.98 70.46 10/30/2003 71.44 - 30.74.3784.1 EBBERS, MARIE 54.14 26.66 27.48 10/07/2003 56.92 - 30.74.3678.2 EDWARDS, DEARL W 75.72 36.96 38.76 10/21/2003 37.78 - 23.02.2734.1 EDWARDS, MICHAEL A 182.67 80.94 61.59 40.14 10/22/2003 45.00 - 15.22.1502.2 EDWARDS, ROBERT 290.81 184.20 106.61 1 0/21/2003 107.59 - 15.22.1490.1 EDWARDS, STAN 217.12 135.38 81.74 09/11/2003 300.97 - 15.21.3164.2 ELEOPOULOS, JAMES 535.54 168.34 328.01 39.19 10/22/2003 42.16 - 36.68.0138.1 ELLINGTON, BRUCE 87.16 41.70 45.46 1 0/20/2003 47.42 - 8.08.1106.2 ELLIS, AMY 115.95 77.06 38.89 1 % 7/2003 38.89 - 14.19.7188.2 ELLIS, SUZANNE 148.08 92.00 56.08 09/12/2003 56.08 - 18.42.2302.1 ELLISON, AUBREY & LYNN 115.14 69.68 45.46 09/08/2003 118.36- 23.02.4540.3 ELSPERMAN, DE WAYNE 85.01 56.10 28.91 10/22/2003 32.83 - 36.69.1602.1 ELWOOD, DELBERT 50.94 41.14 9.80 10/29/2003 34.15 - 30.74.2686.1 EPPERSON,DAREN 82.62 52.80 29.82 10/21/2003 50.00 - 35.35.0101.2 ERA WEST WIND REAL TV 176.50 29.70 146.80 02112/2003 32.45 - 22.50.1240.4 ERHART, MIL T 7.88 7.88 22.50.1242.3 ERHART, MIL T 56.10 52.04 4.06 11/07/2003 40.00 - 22.50.1236.3 ERHART, MILT 74.83 47.06 27.77 09/10/2003 33.65. 22.50.1238.2 ERHART, MIL T 122.25 58.52 63.73 10/21/2003 60.79 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ---L CITY of!' MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10: 19am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 15.22.1634.1 ERICKSON, EVA LOUISE 128.84 80.12 48.72 10/21/2003 58.52 - 15.21.2876.1 ERNESTO, BRIAN 79.61 78.82 .79 10/16/2003 37.00 - 15.21.0134.1 ESPANA JR, FLORENTINO 90.12 59.86 30.26 09/23/2003 31.24 - 16.32.1152.2 ESPINOLA, MIGUEL & MARGARI 152.52 86.20 57.67 8.65 10/02/2003 50.00 - 22.50.1354.4 ESTATE OF BESSIE MATCHAM 134.21 55.64 78.57 10/14/2003 13.00 - 22.50.4550.2 ESTATE OF HELEN ROBERTS 78.58 26.64 25.97 25.97 08/15/2003 33.81 - 23.02.0320.1 ESTEP, NINA 37.34 36.72 .62 11/12/2003 40.00 - 36.69.0244.2 EVANS, GARLAND 45.88 43.92 1.96 10/21/2003 42.81 - 8.08.1114.2 FABRIZIO, BRANDON 135.24 87.98 47.26 09/25/2003 44.32 - 30.74.3614.1 FACKRELL, THOMAS 81.28 39.74 41.54 10/21/2003 44.48 - 24.04.1564.2 FAIRCHILD, KERI 67.50 34.34 33.16 10/21/2003 45.00 - 20.46.4996.2 FAMOUS FOOTWEAR 129.70 127.70 2.00 10/30/2003 125.63 - 23.02.2060.1 FARMER, SCOTT 125.94 68.22 57.72 10/22/2003 59.68 - 17.33.2404.1 FARRELL, MICHAEL 77.70 76.72 .98 10/16/2003 38.23 - 14.14.3544.2 FARRIS, JAMES 151.42 99.42 52.00 10/21/2003 57.88 - 22.50.4812.2 FARROW, GREGORY & CAROL'I 160.45 84.48 75.97 09/16/2003 150.96 - 23.02.5890.1 FElL, KAY OR SKIP FElL 115.47 50.94 64.53 09/16/2003 164.49 - 15.15.0104.2 FELKINS, DAN & YOLANDA 104.34 69.34 35.00 10/21/2003 35.00 - 10.10.0606.1 FENIX CONSTRUCTION 72.62 66.20 6.42 18.42.1840.2 FETTERS FAMIL Y TRUST 152.55 67.91 37.91 46.73 07/14/2003 54.46 - 30.74.1006.1 FISHEL, GEORGE 283.24 1 07.58 175.66 10/22/2003 181.54- 16.32.0568.1 FISHER, MELVIN 104.91 67.22 37.69 09/19/2003 75.00 - 16.16.3640.2 FITZEN, LARAE & LINDA 200.60 98.44 51.02 51.02 .12 09/11/2003 50.00 - 37. 72.0274.1 FITZGERALD, JUANITA 88.69 43.92 44.77 09/16/2003 43.79 - 23.01.1164.4 FLATEN, ROBERT 77.00 56.82 20.18 10/17/2003 42.00 - 14.14.3516.2 FLORES, DAVID 163.99 104.84 59.15 10/09/2003 78.37 - 35.65.0646.3 FLORES, JOY 89.78 45.46 44.32 09/16/2003 46.28 - 29.07.0878.2 FOLWEll, RITA 52.08 25.55 26.53 09/16/2003 27.51 - 18.43.0324.2 FORTIN, JOSEPH 88.25 51.32 36.93 17.34.1288.1 FOURNIER, JAMES 165.65 115.94 49.71 10/1 0/2003 62.00 - 15.15.0010.2 FOWLER, ROBERT & KERRI 151.90 103.66 48.24 10/07/2003 47.26 - 30.74.0708.1 FRANK, GARY E 42.28 37.38 4.90 1 0/29/2003 41.17- 36.69.1200.1 FRANK, GREG & CAROLE 65.58 65.38 .20 1 0/21/2003 79.72 - 23.01.1200.2 FRED SCHIMPH 161.23 65.98 95.25 10/17/2003 32.68 - 16.32.1366.4 FREDERICKS, PAUL 147.31 95.68 51.63 09/23/2003 50.65 - 22.51.3078.3 FREEMAN, NICOLE 86.08 33.90 25.60 26.58 09/15/2003 55.30 - 24.04.1708.2 FREINWALD, CLAY JR 104.50 51.92 52.58 10/15/2003 100.00 - 20.46.0240.2 FRENCH, KATHY & MILES, WILL 87.46 50.24 37.22 09/16/2003 40.00 - 22.50.3754.1 FRENCH, LAWRENCE 197.76 87.26 110.50 11/17/2003 125.00 - 23.01.0830.2 FRIENDS OF CHILDREN & FAMII 52.54 17.60 17.47 17.47 15.22.2506.2 FRIES, CHRS & TRACY 178.48 128.44 50.04 10/24/2003 52.00 - 24.04.1454.1 FUENTES, CHRYSTLE 146.24 50.36 95.88 10/17/2003 61.96 - 16.32.1542.1 FUHRMAN, JOSHUA 183.96 141 .80 42.15 .01 10/21/2003 44.10 - 30.74.3968.3 FUNK, TRAVIS & LAURA 94.25 46.70 47.55 10/21/2003 52.45 - 16.32.1666.2 FURSTENAU, FRED & LaNA 72.55 71.70 .85 10/30/2003 35.00 - 10.10.0688.1 GALLERY HOMES 52.16 48.68 3.48 15.22.2608.2 GALLOWAY, JERMAINE & KRISl 134.20 101.30 32.90 10/22/2003 40.00 - 37.72.0200.1 GALLOWAY, KARL & NONA 109.06 53.14 55.92 10/17/2003 55.92 - 16.31.2250.1 GARCIA, ANOTONIO 256.82 156.62 100.20 10/20/2003 131.18 - 22.50.1996.2 GARCIA, CHRISSY 59.81 59.00 .81 10/10/2003 45.00 - 14.20.1284.2 GARDNER, VINCE 180.36 120.34 59.52 .50 09/17/2003 60.50 - 17.33.2302.1 GARRARD, DALE 102.69 68.22 34.4 7 1 0/22/2003 37.41 - 15.21.0234.3 GARRETT, DAMON 169.26 151.52 17.74 1 0/21/2003 174.00 - 14.20.1364.4 GARRIOTT, PAULA 120.85 80.98 39.87 30.30.6116.1 GARY DAWSON HOMES 6.96 3.48 3.48 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( c- . CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 7 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18,2003 10:20am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 30.74.0706.1 GARY. FRANK 41.64 41.14 .50 10/29/2003 46.39 - 20.46.0188.2 GATES, JOHN 94.48 35.86 32.22 26.40 09/16/2003 70.00 - 15.21.1422.3 GELARDO, MICHAEL & LORI KA' 124.08 64.62 29.73 29.73 08/18/2003 63.38 - 14.20.1826.1 GIBBS, LORIN 218.06 138.62 79.44 10/10/2003 86.30 - 16.31.0864.1 GILBERT, DIANE 121.79 75.40 46.39 09/11/2003 48.35 - 22.50.3858.2 GILL, DANIEL & DANA 58.32 56.12 2.20 11/06/2003 35.00 - 23.02.2578.2 GINGRICK, KENT 135.12 81.66 53.46 1 0/22/2003 53.46 - 23.02.1170.3 GODBY, ORVILLE & PHOEBE 200.49 82.62 117.87 10/21/2003 77.00 - 24.03.0844.1 GODFREY, SHELLI 85.20 42.68 42.52 10/21/2003 35.50 - 15.22.0310.1 GODSIL, MICHAEL & KORRENA 102.52 93.52 9.00 11/17/2003 50.34 - 15.22.1622.4 GOHR, DOUGLAS 186.90 98.42 88.48 10/13/2003 100.00 - 23.01.0150.2 GOLDEN, LEROY 85.40 27.90 28.75 28.75 09/04/2003 60.44 - 23.01.2090.1 GOSSEN, KELLI 83.77 39.18 44.59 10/21/2003 50.00 - 17.34.2846.1 GOWEY, MICHAEL 95.34 91 .42 3.92 11/06/2003 66.65 - 22.50.3908.1 GRAHAM, JOHN & KATHLEEN 75.24 52.78 22.46 10/17/2003 75.00 - 16.32.1610.5 GRAN BY, JOHN & RAMONA 165.86 76.32 53.03 23.03 13.48 09/18/2003 44.27 - 35.64.0064.3 GRAVES, GAIL & JOYCE 52.57 41.18 11.39 11/13/2003 34.47 - 22.51.3350.1 GREGORY, STEVEN 51.09 25.12 25.97 09/12/2003 75.95 - 22.50.2028.2 GRESS, GREG 73.53 42.00 31.53 09/16/2003 32.51 - 22.51.0958.3 GRIEVE, JAMES 81.69 30.31 31.57 19.81 08/14/2003 40.60 - 16.31.0158.1 GRIFFIN, RICHARD & GAIL 145.35 93.72 51.63 10/14/2003 45.09 - 22.50.2412.3 GRISHAM, DANIEL & JANET 96.17 33.18 31.53 31 .46 09/15/2003 32.50 - 17.33.0851.1 GROFF, MARY 161.36 90.26 71.10 06/13/2003 21.12 - 30.74.3176.3 GROSSL, EDNA 83.46 41.04 42.42 10/21/2003 153.00 - 23.02.4290.1 GROSSO, SHADOW 49.13 24.14 24.99 . 10/17/2003 50.94 - 24.03.0034.1 GROUND, JENNIFER 77.68 38.92 38.76 09/15/2003 106.54 - 15.21.0462.3 GUNNARSON, HOWARD & RUTt 161 .40 130.94 30.46 11/06/2003 160.00 - 14.20.0440.1 GUSTAVUS, TED & RHONDA 195.39 131.00 64.39 10/03/2003 65.37 - 22.50.2378.1 GUTHMILLER, BRIAN A 81.05 43.80 37.25 10/09/2003 35.29 - 23.02.1763.1 H & R BLOCK 310.76 137.74 173.02 09/24/2003 132.84 - 37.72.0186.2 HAISLIP, SUZY 138.72 50.52 88.20 10/15/2003 44.52 - 24.04.1296.3 HALES. SCOTT & AMANDA 123.78 60.50 63.28 1 % 1 /2003 59.36 - 15.15.0029.2 HALL, JOHN & CAROL YN 140.93 85.36 42.52 13.05 10/20/2003 65.00 - 16.32.1754.1 HALL, PATRICK 146.79 89.78 57.01 10/07/2003 77.43 - 24.04.1790.3 HAMMER. MARCIE 110.66 66.04 44.62 11/17/2003 64.00 - 23.01.0020.1 HAMMOND 00, THOMAS R 67.11 32.64 34.47 09/23/2003 37.41 - 30.74.2726.2 HAMPEL, SYLVIA 79.87 40.00 39.87 17.34.1046.2 HAMUDOT, NADIR 300.36 155.56 100.84 43.96 10/20/2003 110.84- 16.31.3378.3 HANCOCK, ROBERT 113.18 65.92 35.77 11.49 08/19/2003 46.12 - 15.21.0002.2 HANNA, LINSAY & WAGGENER, 88.78 85.02 3.76 11/14/2003 43.00 - 16.32.1714.1 HANNEMAN, DAVE & KIM 281 .1 8 144.16 137.02 10/14/2003 145.00 - 30.74.2662.1 HANSEN, DAVID 127.23 53.88 73.35 10/24/2003 69.43 - 17.33.4274.1 HANSEN, ERIK 186.26 186.26 02/18/2003 48.00 - 18.42.2356.1 HARP, GREGORY 212.27 117. 38 94.89 10/21/2003 104.00 - 35.65.0210.2 HARRINGTON, MIKE & SHERRY 95.66 46.44 49.22 09/24/2003 44.32 - 18.42.1820.1 HARRINGTON-BLACK. JODY 79.52 42.56 36.96 1 0/21/2003 35.78 - 24.04.1294.4 HARRIS. BOB 66.44 41.86 24.58 10/14/2003 50.00 - 15.21.2090.2 HARRIS. WILLIAM 226.50 148.82 77.68 1 % 1/2003 80.62 - 22.51.0378.1 HARRY'S BAR & GRILL 746.67 344.17 402.50 10/20/2003 470.76 - 23.02.5900.1 HARVEY, LISA M. 102.78 53.40 49.38 10/15/2003 62.00 - 15.21.0182.3 HARWOOD, WILLIAM AND EMM, 228.15 123.44 104.71 10/09/2003 121.37- 17.34.3234.2 HATCH, GARY 73.58 44.94 28.64 10/17/2003 55.00 - 14.20.1624.1 HEATON, JUDITH A. 195.31 124.74 70.57 10/21/2003 102.91 - 23.02.2170.2 HECHT. SHANNON 89.86 46.74 43.12 10/1 0/2003 50.00 - 17.33.4246.1 HELFERICH, ROGER 94.69 65.28 29.41 10/21/2003 40.00 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( CITY OF'MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:20am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non~Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 16.31.0828.4 HEL TON, DEWEY & LISA 182.28 105.62 76.66 10/17/2003 79.60 - 15.22.2526.2 HERBERT, WILLIAM III 160.10 119.94 40.16 10/22/2003 50.00 - 9.09.0056.1 HERITAGE BUILDERS 49.47 38.96 10.51 10/15/2003 24.43 - 9.09.0058.1 HERITAGE BUILDERS 107.74 61.52 24.99 21.23 09/11/2003 35.22 - 6.06.9090.1 HERITAGE HOMES 90.05 52.70 26.35 11.00 08/14/2003 3.48- 22.51.3580.1 HIGGINBOTHAM, RON 145.53 64.50 81.03 10/22/2003 128.67 - 17.34.1640.3 HIGHBARGER. MICHAEL & LIND 298.42 182.72 115.70 10/21/2003 133.34 - 24.03.0382.1 HILL, BRIAN OR VICTORIA 138.48 65.40 73.08 10/23/2003 74.06 - 17.34.1870.2 HILL, RONIE & CARLA 191.60 119.02 72.58 10/20/2003 82.38 - 24.03.0264.2 HILL, TARA 72.67 36.40 36.27 09/05/2003 57.83 - 16.31.0478.1 HIRAHARA, ED 598.56 386.30 212.26 10/09/2003 194.62 - 24.03.0268.1 HOBDEY, BRIAN 48.19 42.02 6.17 11/06/2003 35.00 - 14.20.1668.2 HOGUE, ELLEN & PHILLIP 193.37 98.42 51.50 43.45 11/06/2003 40.00 - 24.04.1792.2 HOHENSHEL T, JOAN 186.06 88.60 97.46 1 0/21/2003 130.00 - 15.22.1528.1 HOLLAND, RICHARD 114.50 114.30 .20 11/17/2003 66.13 - 14.19.0354.2 HOLLOWAY, JENNIFER & TAD 154.13 82.88 71.25 09/18/2003 77.07 - 30.74.1014.3 HOLLOWAY, JERALD K 78.55 38.36 40.19 09/23/2003 101.94- 15.21.1928.2 HOLMES, MICHAEL & LAURIE 189.74 91.90 97.84 10/14/2003 83.52 - 31.52.0415.1 HOME DEPOT #1804 50.08 13.28 36.80 09/1 6/2003 57.38 - 30.74.0344.2 HOOK, SHIRLEY 72.01 37.54 34.47 10/14/2003 51.29 - 14.20.1556.1 HOOVER, L YND 155.78 99.06 56.72 1 % 1 /2003 62.60 - 16.32.0530.3 HOOVER, L YND 200.35 102.38 97.97 1 % 1/2003 119.53- 22.51.4214.1 HOOVER, L YND 215.37 111.45 103.92 1 % 1/2003 122.12 - 22.51.0678.1 HOOVER, L YND 118.11 50.30 67.81 1 % 1/2003 172.67 - 22.51.4218.1 HOOVER, L YND 175.05 80.81 94.24 1 % 1/2003 90.32 - 23.01.3342.1 HOOVER, L YND 88.32 41.71 46.61 1 % 1 /2003 44.65 - 22.50.0678.1 HOOVER. L YND M 126.58 66.58 60.00 10/01/2003 73.72 - 22.50.0680.1 HOOVER. L YND M 92.49 49.52 42.97 10/01/2003 59.63 - 16.31.3606.3 HORTON, ROBERT 195.72 123.28 72.44 10/20/2003 76.00 - 30.30.6128.2 HOUDE, RICHARD & CATHRYN 59.59 28.88 30.71 10/21/2003 59.46 - 24.04.0810.2 HOUST, DALE & SHERRY 166.78 67.44 99.34 10/01/2003 113.00- 23.02.3000.1 HOUSTON, TONY & THERESA 80.04 53.60 26.44 10/21/2003 100.00 - 23.01.0420.1 HOWARD, TREVIS 90.60 30.26 60.34 09/17/2003 88.72 - 30.74.3538.2 HOWE, RICHARD & LAUREN 73.10 35.16 37.94 10/01/2003 60.48 - 22.50.0226.1 HOWELL, JAMES 228.90 144.15 84.75 10/22/2003 100.00 - 16.31.2322.1 HRUSKA, LAWRENCE 114.94 95.68 19.26 08/26/2003 55.55 - 30.74.3218.3 HUBER, STEPHANIE 70.46 45.46 25.00 10/17/2003 55.4 7 - 35.65.0708.1 HUDDLESTON, CODY 146.08 57.72 88.36 09/17/2003 130.00 - 18.42.1860.3 HUFFAKER, ROBERT 307.68 296.05 11.63 10/03/2003 220.89 - 15.15.0154.1 HUG, MARLON 74.25 49.26 24.99 09/09/2003 76.93 - 22.51.0714.2 HUMPHREYS, JOHN 91.86 37.22 36.11 18.53 09/16/2003 50.00 - 15.21.1960.1 HUMPHREYS, LARRY 376.31 106.92 87.22 141.49 40.68 09/18/2003 100.00 - 14.19.1166.2 HUNEMILLER, KELLY 105.91 94.44 11.47 10/29/2003 52.65 - 16.31.3402.1 HUNT,HEATH 124.59 81.62 42.97 10/20/2003 50.00 - 36.69.0084.1 HUNTER, DAVID 88.69 43.92 44.77 09/11/2003 85.62 - 15.15.0048.3 HUNTER, PAUL 116.12 89.48 26.64 10/20/2003 70.00 - 14.20.2054.1 HUTH, FREDRICK C. 168.00 158.88 9.12 10/17/2003 138.00 - 21.49.1148.1 IDAHO HEATING AND AIR 1,888.80 449.38 351.93 682.73 404.76 09/22/2003 622.46 - 22.51.3024.1 IDAHO TENT & CANVAS 103.48 28.82 74.66 09/16/2003 47.48 - 22.51.3025.1 IDAHO TENT & CANVAS 65.76 22.10 43.66 09/16/2003 103.54 - 17.33.2754.1 INGOE, BRADLEY 171.12 94.84 76.28 10/22/2003 60.84 - 16.32.1148.1 IRWIN, DAVID 143.39 93.72 49.67 10/21/2003 50.65 - 10.10.1080.2 ITZHAKOV, YURI & KRISTI 120.02 78.16 41.86 09/23/2003 38.92 - 30.30.5008.1 J D MARRS 138.74 17.60 17.47 62.59 41.08 07/28/2003 14.26 - 17.34.0012.3 JACKEl, JANETTE 83.52 44.68 22.21 16.63 07/22/2003 21.23 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( ........---- ( CITY OF 'MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:20am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 23.02.5820.1 JACKSON, ROBERT 59.22 34.60 24.62 11/17/2003 30.00 - 18.42.1934.4 JACOBSEN, FRANK 98.64 70.50 28.14 10/24/2003 25.00 - 36.68.0046.1 JACOBSEN, JASON & LIANNA 107.16 39.90 38.76 28.50 09/15/2003 50.00 - 16.31.3368.5 JACQUES, RYAN 143.39 93.72 49.67 16.32.1552.1 JAKOMEIT, MICHAEL 125.75 81.96 43.79 09/16/2003 71 .83 - 17.33.0376.1 JAMES COURT APTS 73.63 50.72 22.91 10/20/2003 19.97 - 17.33.0380.1 JAMES COURT APTS 185.45 125.92 59.53 10/20/2003 60.51 - 17.33.0374.1 JAMES COURT APTS 171.25 111.88 59.37 10/20/2003 52.51 - 17.33.0408.1 JAMES COURT APTS 382.49 216.12 166.37 10/20/2003 184.01 - 17.33.0370.1 JAMES COURT APTS 153.59 103.70 49.89 10/20/2003 50.87 - 17.33.0390.1 JAMES COURT APTS 284.39 145.82 138.57 10/20/2003 161.11 - 17.33.0366.1 JAMES COURT APTS 579.05 331.48 247.57 1 0/20/2003 296.57 - 17.33.0362.1 JAMES COURT APTS 198.21 133.12 65.09 1 0/20/2003 63.13 - 17.33.0382.1 JAMES COURT APTS 231.09 154.06 77.03 10/20/2003 78.01 - 17.33.0388.1 JAMES COURT APTS 106.03 71.34 34.69 1 0/20/2003 32.73 - 17.33.0358.1 JAMES COURT APTS 1,820.02 1,150.98 669.04 1 0/20/2003 694.52 - 17.33.0396.1 JAMES COURT APTS 159.95 105.00 54.95 1 0/20/2003 48.09 - 17.33.0386.1 JAMES COURT APTS 192.81 121.68 71.13 1 0/20/2003 65.25 - 17.33.0400.1 JAMES COURT APTS 182.01 116.44 65.57 1 0/20/2003 63.61 - 17.33.0394.1 JAMES COURT APTS 107.97 72.96 35.01 1 0/20/2003 37.95 - 35.65.0666.2 JAMESON, BRETT 72.78 36.96 35.82 10/16/2003 36.80 - 35.35.0112.2 JARDINE, JEFFREY 66.16 33.46 32.70 1 0/20/2003 32.00 - 15.21.3096.1 JAVERNICK, YAJENNE 148.84 145.80 3.04 11/17/2003 75.00 - 6.06.1428.1 JC CONSTRUCTION 22.06 15.10 3.48 3.48 14.19.1202.1 JEFF & PAM PUGMIRE 164.49 109.42 55.07 10/14/2003 55.07 - 17.34.2102.2 JEFFS, RICHARD 156.09 98.92 57.17 1 % 1/2003 48.35 - 15.21.1912.1 JENKINS, DWIGHT 304.83 166.52 138.31 1 0/24/2003 1 02.43 - 36.69.0678.1 JENSEN, WILLIAM 153.69 61.72 91.97 10/17/2003 95.89 - 20.46.4778.1 JL HARDY 187.52 82.71 67.15 15.07 22.59 36.36.1114.1 JOE PALMER 130.32 53.96 76.36 09/23/2003 61.32 - 14.20.0430.1 JOHN J VNUK 128.92 96.38 32.54 10/22/2003 88.27 - 18.42.0374.3 JOHNSON, DORTHY & REX .184.24 86.60 85.93 11.71 11/13/2003 25.00 - 22.50.0326.1 JOHNSON, JEANNE & DALLAS 93.81 50.18 43.63 10/14/2003 42.46 - 24.04.1596.2 JOHNSON, JUDY 65.10 42.34 22.76 10/17/2003 40.00 - 6.06.9702.1 JOHNSON, KYLE & JODY 89.04 47.46 19.81 21.77 08/26/2003 21 .77 - 23.01.2710.2 JOHNSON,MARC 110.25 51.76 58.49 15.21.0124.2 JOHNSON, RICK & TRACIE 79.14 76.20 2.94 11/06/2003 35.98 - 23.02.1890.3 JOHNSON, STEVE & BARB 86.93 50.66 36.27 10/15/2003 34.73 - 35.35.2224.2 JOHNSTON, PATRICIA 68.09 31.66 36.43 10/17/2003 34.47 - 35.65.0236.2 JONES, DAVID & AMY 84.77 41.96 42.81 10/07/2003 44.77 - 36.68.0320.1 JONES, DONALD 73.50 42.68 30.82 10/10/2003 35.00 - 15.22.0330.1 JONES, ELDON & LORI 240.12 158.88 81.24 1 0/20/2003 90.06 - 14.14.5008.2 JONES. KARLA 225.96 3.48 222.48 04/29/2003 66.22 - 24.04.1766.3 JONES, STEPHEN & CONNIE 54.60 46.04 8.56 10/23/2003 100.00 - 14.20.1988.1 JONES, SYLVIA 634.02 423.44 210.58 10/07/2003 330.14 - 22.50.2098.3 JONES, WES & CINDY 113.84 61.68 52.16 10/21/2003 52.16 - 22.50.2418.2 JONES, WES & CINDY 91.11 56.70 34.41 10/03/2003 65.00 - 24.03.0828.2 JONES, WESLEY & CYNTHIA 48.44 47.46 .98 10/28/2003 45.78 - 17.33.3572.1 JORDAN, KATHY 235.42 136.94 95.86 2.62 1 0/20/2003 54.00 - 15.21.1058.2 JORGENSEN, ROBERT & TERI L 196.88 110.52 86.36 10/28/2003 55.00 - 20.46.0802.4 JUDY, VICTOR 97.39 55.96 41 .43 10/15/2003 35.00 - 14.20.1932.1 JUSTICE, PAT 271.22 166.90 104.32 10/17/2003 120.00 - 15.21.0530.2 JUSTIN, TRACY 267.18 213.70 53.48 10/21/2003 84.46 - 6.06.9040.1 K CROFTS CONSTRUCTION 55.87 52.39 3.48 24.03.0310.2 KAYLR, AMANDA 267.79 82.90 87.67 65.51 31.71 10/21/2003 90.67 - *H in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( CITY OF'MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:21 am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 15.22.1408.1 KEATHLEY,CLARENCE 114.73 113.46 1.27 1 0/29/2003 70.00 - 15.21.0028.2 KEENEY, DONLAN & ElISABET~ 123.38 80.78 42.60 10/21/2003 50.00 - 15.22.1514.2 KEHR, JOHN 163.64 149.74 13.90 10/21/2003 100.00 - 17.33.2756.1 KELLER, KEVIN 117.58 77.84 39.74 10/15/2003 62.28 - 36.69.0780.1 KELLEY, GERRI 133.57 72.44 61.13 10/22/2003 35.00 - 30.74.2422.1 KELLEY, KENT 113.66 64.74 48.92 10/01/2003 28.40 - 22.50.1586.2 KELSO, BONNIE 115.77 19.70 96.07 11/17/2003 25.4 7 - 24.04.1614.2 KENNEDY, MICHAEL 217.52 72.36 63.76 81 .40 08/25/2003 60.82 - 15.22.1356.1 KERBS, MARVIN L. 263.85 146.30 11 7.55 10/21/2003 117.08 - 15.21.2728.1 KESLING, SCOTT & MONICA 171 .48 104.30 67.18 10/21/2003 76.92 - 18.42.1810.2 KESTER,ROBERT 124.86 80.24 40.72 3.90 10/22/2003 40.00 - 15.21.3298.4 KIESECKER, DARRIN 182.28 105.62 76.66 10/22/2003 72.38 - 18.42.2530.1 KILER, KELLY & TAMMY 159.1 2 83.02 76.10 10/21/2003 70.00 - 15.22.1338.2 KILLION, DAVID & AMY 137.04 78.30 58.74 10/17/2003 70.00 - 22.50.0594.2 KINDALL, ARRON & MISTIE 130.26 76.74 53.52 1 0/22/2003 50.00 - 30.74.3228.1 KISSEE, ROBERT 173.40 30.00 3.48 66.64 73.28 06/12/2003 38.60 - 30.74.3358.1 KLEIN, DANIEL & MARIL YN 65.16 33.20 31.96 1 0/21/2003 40.00 - 22.50.1918.1 KORB,KARA 81.16 43.38 37.78 1 0/21/2003 49.03 - 17.34.3228.2 KOWATSCH, JOHN & KRISTI 164.1 0 112.48 51.62 1 0/30/2003 50.00 - 14.19.6642.1 KRENZ,ROY 213.4 7 75.88 37.78 39.74 60.07 1 % 1/2003 73.00 - 15.21.1550.2 KROMMENHOEK, PAUL 179.94 102.68 77.26 1 % 1/2003 97.46 - 22.50.4642.3 KUGEL, LISA 170.50 73.86 96.64 10/28/2003 67.00 - 20.46.0368.2 KUPER,GREG 52.54 51.88 .66 1 0/21/2003 87.00 - 22.50.2404.3 LACASSE, BRIAN & SONYA 132.56 72.54 60.02 10/21/2003 58.00 - 22.50.1750.1 LACY, MEL 108.62 59.56 49.06 10/08/2003 58.33 - 14.14.5048.2 LAIN, MARTIN 159.34 108.38 50.96 10/16/2003 53.00 - 15.22.0338.1 LAMKEY, ALLEN 109.74 109.22 .52 10/21/2003 60.00 - 15.21.1940.3 LANCE, EDWARD & DELOY 256.00 148.36 107.64 10/22/2003 72.74 - 22.50.0512.2 LANDER, ANTHONY 175.02 81.78 69.67 23.57 10/27/2003 100.00 - 15.22.1362.1 LANDIN, DON & LEE 84.24 84.04 .20 10/17/2003 58.32 - 15.21.2814.2 LANDOW, JOANN 144.34 95.82 48.52 10/21/2003 46.00 - 22.50.4268.2 LANHAM, PATRICE 112.57 65.60 46.97 09/23/2003 48.00 - 18.42.1782.1 LANSING, DANETTE 45.09 24.84 20.25 09/16/2003 21 .23 - 23.02.4490.2 LARSON, LEIF 78.54 54.70 23.84 11/13/2003 40.00 - 16.31.0866.1 LARSON-POOLE, VICKEE K. 167.89 102.54 65.35 10/21/2003 75.15 - 23.02.6490.2 LAWRENCE, MICHAEL & KIMBEl 98.92 4.46 85.64 8.82 08/21/2003 137.21 - 37.37.3398.2 LAWRENCE, WENDELL & KATHI 109.51 51.34 58.04 .13 10/20/2003 40.00 - 14.19.1570.2 LEHOSIT, RICHARD & MERRIL YI 112.03 75.10 36.93 36.69.0936.1 LEIBY, TROY 149.56 53.72 95.84 1 0/03/2003 79.07 - 18.43.0370.2 LEMAR, RICK & MELISSA 105.02 57.76 47.26 1 0/21/2003 46.28 - 18.42.2736.1 LENAGHEN, CHRIS 81.14 44.84 36.30 10/01/2003 76.10 - 18.42.2278.1 LEQUERICA, CINDY 140.72 65.76 74.96 10/10/2003 100.00 - 15.15.0782.1 LEUTHOLD, DAN 88.56 74.08 11.00 3.48 37.72.0208.1 LEWIS, PHILLIP 197.26 94.30 102.96 10/20/2003 1 01 .00 - 17.34.1754.1 LIEBERMAN, DAVID 215.45 133.92 81.53 10/21/2003 104.07 - 22.50.2130.1 LIKES, JENNIFER 99.35 58.34 41.01 10/17/2003 68.00 - 29.07.0772.2 LINCOLN, CHARLES 1 01 .65 49.94 51.71 10/15/2003 49.75 - 23.02.4070.4 LJ PROPERTIES LLC 51 .40 24.23 27.17 09/1 0/2003 67.08 - 23.02.4080.4 LJ PROPERTIES LLC 35.70 16.87 18.83 09/1 0/2003 35.70 - 23.02.4090.2 LJ PROPERTIES LLC 31.12 15.07 16.05 09/10/2003 31.12 - 23.02.4100.2 LJ PROPERTIES, LLC 66.44 32.73 33.71 09/10/2003 67.42 - 18.42.2520.1 LOCKYER, MERRIE 130.95 75.56 55.39 10/17/2003 64.00 - 36.36.1012.1 LOGUE, MERTON & REBECCA 79.21 39.18 40.03 10/20/2003 39.05 - 36.69.1538.1 LOIS, LOUIS J. 75.72 37.94 37.78 09/09/2003 39.74 - 14.19.0778.2 LOKKER, TERRY & REBECCA 137.20 92.88 44.32 10/03/2003 47.26 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 11 Standard Payment Customers Nav 18, 2003 10:21 am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 16.32.0754.2 LONG, LUJEAN 245.52 151.70 93.82 10/17/2003 98.72 - 23.02.0464.1 LOVE, JEANETTE & JOHN 35.44 35.44 10/24/2003 229.49 - 18.42.2290.1 LOVE, JEFFREY 183.10 99.74 83.36 09/15/2003 196.12- 17.33.2706.1 LOVELAND, JEREMY 129.25 59.72 69.53 09/17/2003 103.22 - 22.51.3086.6 LOVITT, MICHAEL 167.70 167.70 04/25/2003 66.02 - 6.06.1492.2 LOWRY, ROBERT & DEBI 105.72 94.88 10.84 09/03/2003 86.00 - 23.02.0402.1 LUBACKY, DANITA 168.75 71.70 97.05 10/21/2003 107.02 - 23.02.5510.2 LUNA, JAMES & LORI 179.65 83.11 96.54 09/24/2003 168.08 - 24.04.0554.5 LUNDSTEDT, MICHAEL 84.88 41.54 43.34 09/~ 6/2003 42.36 - 30.74.0670.9 LUTHI, SHAD 102.52 50.36 52.16 09/10/2003 109.22 - 22.50.0140.1 LYNN, DEE R. 61.75 61.62 .13 11/17/2003 103.00 - 17.33.2340.3 LYON, CHRIS & TAMMY 213.26 137.94 75.32 1 0/29/2003 58.00 - 30.74.2840.1 MACHO, CRAIG & TAMMY 99.50 53.96 45.54 1 0/21/2003 60.00 - 24.04.0816.2 MACOMB, SHELLEY 58.52 58.30 .22 1 0/20/2003 75.00 - 30.74.3504.2 MADDOX, DALLAS 121.40 44.08 77.32 35.35.0206.3 MADERY, DARRYL & SUEZETTE 35.16 34.18 .98 10/08/2003 68.04 - 23.01.3350.1 MADSEN, LOU 74.33 27.90 32.67 13.76 09/16/2003 80.00 - 22.51.0858.1 MAHATHY, ANTHONY 72.87 38.24 34.63 10/14/2003 41 .49 - 6.06.9858.2 MAl, CURTIS 77.09 37.66 18.83 20.60 08/08/2003 20.00 - 20.46.0508.2 MANN, AARON 57.67 40.20 17.47 10/09/2003 28.75 - 18.42.3740.2 MANN, JOSH 90.19 42.00 48.19 10/16/2003 44.27 - 8.08.1058.2 MANWARNING. JOSHUA & JONI 139.24 88.82 49.67 .75 1 0/20/2003 45.00 - 24.03.0056.2 MARCHANT, KIMBERL Y 61.32 51.82 9.50 11/14/2003 50.00 - 18.42.2332.1 MARIN, JOSE 193.24 110.20 83.04 1 0/28/2003 117.94 - 15.21.1760.1 MARKLE, JAMES 108.42 108.42 02113/2003 47.55 - 35.35.1046.2 MARSHALL, GARY & BOBETTE 119.78 73.50 46.28 1 0/22/2003 45.33 - 22.50.2176.1 MARTIN, JASON 271.85 97.24 126.08 48.53 09/17/2003 79.51 - 35.35.1170.2 MARTINEZ, LUIS & VERONICA 83.24 41.70 41.54 10/17/2003 41.54 - 24.04.1548.2 MARX, JANA & BRADLEY, JON 131.39 64.32 67.07 10/17/2003 153.66 - 17.34.2806.3 MARX, ZACH & KATIE 227.17 113.00 114.17 10/10/2003 70.56 - 23.02.2280.1 MASLEN, JENNY 51.17 45.76 5.41 11/17/2003 40.00 - 6.06.9006.1 MATRIX HOMES 14.51 11.03 3.48 15.22.1068.2 MAUPIN, SHELL Y 0 147.27 75.40 71.87 10/14/2003 158.06 - 15.15.0005.2 MAUZY, JEFFREY & TI FFANI 67.26 66.26 1.00 10/15/2003 34.45 - 17.34.2908.2 MAYER, MELINDA & MICHAEL 115.39 86.86 28.53 1 0/20/2003 50.00 - 36.68.0030.6 MCCABE, MICHAEL & CATHERlt 84.44 43.92 40.52 10/16/2003 50.00 - 36.69.2258.4 MCCANDLESS, DOUG 224.85 65.98 73.06 85.81 09/10/2003 76.00 - 30.74.2826.2 MCCASHLAND, DAVID 51.92 50.36 1.56 10/28/2003 65.00 - 18.42.2072.1 MCCLINTICK, TODD & LEISA 191.73 98.68 93.05 10/21/2003 84.23 - 14.20.1716.2 MCFREDERICK, JEFF 151.25 103.86 47.39 10/0212003 50.70 - 20.47.1156.2 MCGOWN, MARK & TRACI 89.23 49.36 39.87 10/09/2003 38.89 - 17.34.1854.1 MCGURER, WAYNE 259.18 157.54 101.64 10/17/2003 106.54 - 22.51.3246.1 MCKAGUE, RICK 106.89 76.28 30.61 11/07/2003 35.00 - 16.31.0822.1 MCKAY, JOHN 271.82 139.11 132.71 1 0/21/2003 82.19 - 36.36.0986.1 MCKINLEY, DENNIS 82.81 41.96 40.85 10/16/2003 40.85 - 23.02.4870.4 MCKINLEY, JUNE 124.87 83.72 41.15 11/14/2003 50.00 - 15.22.2500.2 MCLAUGHLIN, MIKE & MEGAN 66.62 64.30 2.32 10/15/2003 31.00 - 14.20.1712.1 McLENNAN, MICHAEL 153.38 101.38 52.00 09/23/2003 53.96 - 22.50.2444.1 MCNITT, STEVE & TRACY 71.02 40.76 30.26 09/10/2003 62.48 - 23.02.5590.1 MEDENA, RAYMOND 71.80 36.96 34.84 10/20/2003 61 .30 - 17.34.0968.2 MEHOLCHICK, VICKY 220.98 130.44 90.54 10/20/2003 73.75 - 17.34.3276.1 MEIER, JOHN & HEIDI 109.41 109.30 .11 10/20/2003 70.11 - 24.04.2052.2 MENDENHALL, ALAN 177.86 99.64 78.22 10/22/2003 98.96 - 35.35.0408.2 MENDIOLA, GREG & CYNTHIA 54.22 35.42 18.80 10/21/2003 37.25 - 16.31.3304.2 MERCER, APRIL 153.63 153.63 02111/2003 71 .00 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent " ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 12 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:21am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 23.02.0778.1 MERCER, JAMES 87.71 40.00 43.79 3.92 10/17/2003 43.79 - 31.52.1090.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 1 ,893.72 729.95 1 ,163.77 1 0/20/2003 600.00 - 31.52.1100.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 552.78 154.19 398.59 09/1 0/2003 225.63 - 17.33.7618.2 MERRITT, RICK 68.94 16.58 24.71 27.65 1 % 1/2003 33.53 - 16.31.0494.2 MESZAROS,L1LLI 150.44 101.38 49.06 10/21/2003 48.08 - 16.31.2310.2 MEYER, SHERYL 107.11 76.72 30.39 08/19/2003 53.91 - 17.33.7616.1 MICHAELSON. BRADLEY 144.73 91.26 53.47 1 0/20/2003 53.47 - 30.74.1032.1 MICHAELSON, BRADL Y C. 95.23 46.70 48.53 10/07/2003 46.57 - 18.42.2084.1 MIDDLETON, J.R. 154.20 108.74 45.46 11/17/2003 50.00 - 14.20.0060.1 MIILLER, JOHN 292.62 183.30 109.32 10/22/2003 1 01 .48 - 16.31.3032.3 MILLER. CHARLIE & SHELL Y 193.01 106.80 86.21 10/07/2003 58.17 - 30.74.3696.1 MILLER, GREGORY & ERICA 103.91 36.56 67.35 09/17/2003 99.00 - 16.31.2984.2 MILLER, JENNIFER 325.40 241.57 83.83 10/30/2003 33.32 - 22.50.2210.2 MILLER, SCOTT 63.07 33.34 29.73 09/16/2003 31 .69 - 17.34.0934.1 MIRANDA, MARK A. 178.67 107.44 71.23 10/08/2003 90.83 - 35.64.4070.2 MITCHELL, RANDY 141.63 59.52 65.24 16.87 09/23/2003 50.00 - 30.74.3108.3 MOGFORD, DWIGHT 67.20 65.18 2.02 11/06/2003 63.03 - 14.20.1652.2 MOLEBASH, JOHN & MONICA 150.73 93.06 57.67 11/12/2003 60.61 - 24.04.0538.1 MONSON, THOMAS 94.66 38.10 56.56 10/01/2003 74.80 - 17.34.1540.1 MONTEFERRANTE, MICHELLE 84.36 77.38 6.98 10/09/2003 40.00 - 15.22.2088.2 MOODY, SHAIN 102.21 68.88 33.33 10/20/2003 33.33 - 30.74.1076.1 MOORE, EVEL YN 30.84 28.88 1.96 11/13/2003 28.75 - 30.74.3472.3 MOORE, JESSICA & CHRISTOPf 44.32 43.50 .82 11/14/2003 43.50 - 24.04.1634.1 MOORE, RUSSELL C 70.82 28.06 42.63 .13 09/17/2003 85.00 - 23.02.4400.2 MORGAN, FRANK 56.16 56.08 .08 10/16/2003 58.86 - 24.03.0889.1 MORNING GLORY #2 HOA 1 0.44 10.44 23.02.3020.2 MORRIS, TRAVIS 85.31 45.44 39.87 10/20/2003 38.89 - 23.02.5630.2 MORRISON, DWAYNE 113.65 49.48 53.27 10.90 10/08/2003 100.00 - 23.01.0780.3 MORTENSEN, CAMMI 108.96 53.99 54.97 10/08/2003 106.36 - 30.74.0022.1 MORTON, MERRILEE PARK 66.11 23.32 42.79 10/13/2003 108.57 - 17.34.0500.1 MOURITSEN, LAYNE 242.39 136.20 106.19 10/21/2003 127.75 - 23.01.0076.3 MOUSER, ADRIAN 89.16 46.20 42.96 10/15/2003 45.00 - 15.21.0212.1 MOUSER, TOMMY & DEBBIE 163.4 7 99.92 63.55 09/23/2003 66.49 - 16.32.0650.2 MOWRY. CHARLOTTE 178.62 65.92 60.27 52.43 1 % 1/2003 102.90 - 22.50.0262.1 MURRI, SCOTT 84.10 46.74 37.36 10/21/2003 44.00 - 14.19.6506.2 MUSICK, LYLE 131.77 90.26 41.51 10/17/2003 45.00 - 30.74.2942.2 MYRICK, DONALD 100.13 50.62 49.51 10/17/2003 42.65 - 30.74.3654.3 NAGLE, GEORGE & JUDY 56.65 27.90 28.75 10/21/2003 34.63 - 35.35.1407.1 NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION 140.24 136.76 3.48 10/28/2003 3.48- 18.42.3088.2 NASH, TIM & JOCEL YN 49.02 48.28 .74 11/06/2003 39.00 - 16.32.1606.2 NASIATKA, JEFFREY 104.36 71.82 32.54 10/20/2003 40.00 - 36.69.2302.1 NEAL, KEVIN & MICHELLE 83.06 42.68 40.38 10/21/2003 40.00 - 24.04.1876.2 NEEDS,KATHY 113.62 49.54 64.08 10/21/2003 68.98 - 14.19.0046.2 NEITZELL, JAMES & HEATHER 208.34 122.62 85.72 10/21/2003 100.00 - 24.03.0660.1 NEWHOUSE, RAYMOND & TINA 54.09 50.04 4.05 11/10/2003 80.00 - 23.01.3200.1 NEWKIRK, MARYANN 47.49 24.30 23.19 10/17/2003 25.15 - 18.42.2704.1 NICKELL, TROY 76.90 43.70 33.20 09/16/2003 68.36 - 30.74.0664.1 NIELSON, STEVE 64.66 31.00 33.66 10/21/2003 47.00 - 15.22.1290.1 NIGH, MICHAEL 115.18 111.18 4.00 11/17/2003 120.94 - 16.32.1758.1 NORRIS, GLENA 201.26 130.96 70.30 10/20/2003 80.00 - 24.04.0916.2 NUGENT, MICHAEL 110.86 49.06 61.80 08/22/2003 51.38 - 24.04.1260.2 OBENCHAIN, TERRY & ELLOND. 82.81 42.94 39.87 23.02.5370.1 ODOM, SHERRY 166.91 45.70 63.81 57.40 09/17/2003 76.24 - 24.04.1598.1 OGAN, JOHN & DAWN 69.02 42.02 27.00 10/03/2003 75.11 - 18.42.4302.2 OGDEN, NATHAN & HEATHER 97.18 54.82 42.36 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( , CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 13 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:22am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 16.16.3302.2 O'HARE, JUDITH 299.52 230.16 55.76 13.60 10/22/2003 50.00 - 13.13.8816.2 OLIVER. SHELLI 131 .80 87.32 44.48 10/21/2003 45.44 - 20.47.0030.1 OLSEN, DOUGLAS 29.28 29.28 1 % 1/2003 28.30 - 23.01.1210.2 O'NEAL, GEORGE & JANET 71.03 32.64 38.39 10/21/2003 36.43 - 32.32.4954.1 ONEIL HOMES 69.78 31.40 38.38 1 0/20/2003 42.00 - 16.32.0424.1 ORUP M.D., HANS I 153.17 153.04 .13 10/10/2003 90.34 - 14.19.6562.1 OSBURN, GARY & KELLY 99.92 65.74 32.22 1.96 08/14/2003 62.48 - 16.32.1460.1 OSBURN, JODY 112.40 86.86 25.54 10/20/2003 42.00 - 22.51.3430.2 OVERTON, DAVID 118.99 35.74 83.25 09/23/2003 102.28 - 15.22.0454.1 P. JANSSON, JANIE 249.48 1 65.1 2 84.36 09/24/2003 130.14 - 15.21.2230.1 PAGE, LINDA 86.58 62.80 23.78 10/28/2003 35.00 - 22.50.1770.2 PALMER, ELDON 114.19 62.41 51.78 09/16/2003 25.46 - 25.05.0428.1 PALOMO, ALEX 68.96 52.80 16.16 10/21/2003 60.00 - 6.06.1241.1 PARK POINT MANAGEMENT 2,063.54 183.36 1 .880. 18 09/16/2003 1,061.88 - 36.69.0300.1 PARK, JON & TESSIA 96.64 48 .40 48.24 10/21/2003 46.28 - 35.64.3050.1 PARRISH. MARTIN 94.22 46.70 47.52 10/20/2003 46.19 - 23.02.2550.6 PAUL PACK 132.69 64.72 59.15 8.82 10/15/2003 77.77 - 22.51.0318.3 PAULIN, BEN 85.01 26.10 58.91 09/18/2003 60.65 - 24.04.0522.1 PEACOCK, ROBERT 63.62 31 .40 32.22 09/16/2003 73.26 - 22.51.3810.2 PERKINS, BRADLEY & PATRIClt 123.33 62.22 61.11 10/16/2003 67.09 - 15.22.2576.2 PETERSEN, RONALD & DANA 153.38 102.36 51.02 09/16/2003 52.98 - 16.32.0690.2 PETTERSON,KENNETH 170.35 104.18 66.17 10/20/2003 58.33 - 35.65.0664.2 PETTY, LYLE & BARBARA 41.48 40.98 .50 10/09/2003 38.39 - 16.32.0490.4 PFAFF, CHRISTOPHER & KRIST 151.81 68.88 82.93 09/17/2003 57.83 - '37.37.3868.3 PICCOLA, NATALIE & JASON 77.01 47.52 29.49 10/14/2003 65.00 - 23.23.3006.2 PICKERING, ROBERT 79.53 38.36 41.17 10/17/2003 72.15 - 36.69.1116.1 PIERCE, KIM 76.70 38.92 37.78 08/18/2003 78.50 - 20.47.1110.3 PIERCE, WILLIAM & LAURA 120.85 80.66 40.19 10/22/2003 40.19 - 16.32.1420.1 PLASTER, KURTIS & ELlZABETI- 122.31 83.26 39.05 10/14/2003 41.01 - 24.04.1412.1 PLUMLEY, RODNEY & M. NAOM 114.74 57.06 57.68 10/17/2003 62.00 - 23.02.3340.1 POE, RICHARD 194.88 97.22 97.66 10/13/2003 109.00 - 18.42.2336.1 POGUE, LISLE & VICKI 124.28 62.98 61.30 09/16/2003 76.00 - 15.21.1932.1 POINDEXTER, RICHARD I 174.94 114.12 60.82 09/15/2003 136.34 - 15.22.0868.1 POLLARD, RONALD 430.82 270.66 160.16 09/15/2003 262.82 - 17.33.3754.2 POMERLEAU, KATRINA 71.89 68.04 3.85 09/24/2003 37.78 - 23.02.1840.2 PORTENIER, ROBERT & RACHE 52.13 51.32 .81 10/10/2003 42.00 - 24.03.0332.1 PORTER, DAVID 67.11 33.62 33.49 09/11/2003 66.98 - 36.69.0522.1 PORTER, DOUGLAS 156.65 67.12 89.53 09/15/2003 85.61 - 23.02.0460.1 POTTER, MICHAEL & CONNIE 96.39 84.20 12.19 10/27/2003 100.00 - 17.34.3254.2 POULSEN, BRIAN 160.84 75.00 85.84 10/20/2003 85.00 - 35.35.2390.2 POWELL, ANDREW & KATHERI~ 108.08 53.14 54.94 10/22/2003 42.20 - 16.31.1010.1 PRADO, RIGOBERTO 153.37 99.42 53.95 1 % 1/2003 51.03 - 35.35.0081.3 PRELLWITZ, RODNEY & BARBAI 83.79 39.02 44.77 18.42.2390.1 PREMSETTLEMENT FINANCING 25.02 25.02 10/16/2003 47.39 - 23.02.0418.2 PRICE, DOUGLAS 171.03 75.78 95.25 1 0/21/2003 90.13 - 13.13.2032.2 PRICE, JACK & LORI 126.25 85.56 40.69 10/20/2003 48.53 - 24.04.1934.3 PRICE, JOHN & RYAN, BRETT 90.12 83.12 7.00 11/06/2003 132.83 - 30.74.2456.1 PRINCE. MALCOM & TINA 176.38 78.96 97.42 10/20/2003 100.36 - 30.74.3418.2 PRINDLE, SHELL Y 124.76 44.64 80.12 10/22/2003 55.00 - 17.33.2602.2 PRYOR. JUNE 117.41 78.36 39.05 09/17/2003 38.07 - 30.74.2338.1 PUCKETT, ROB & LENI SUE 110.25 51.76 58.49 09/23/2003 61.43 - 18.42.2070.5 PUETT, KATRINA 128.43 74.84 53.59 09/24/2003 88.87 - 23.01.0100.2 PYLlCAN, WOODROW A. 131 .29 131.29 02118/2003 45.26 - 15.21.1476.2 QUINTANA, LOUIS 82.13 54.82 27.31 10/17/2003 26.00 - 30.74.0902.2 RACKHAM, LARRY 64.83 20.39 21.24 23.20 09/16/2003 23.20 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( CITY OF'MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 14 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18,2003 10:22am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 24.04.1838.3 RADICAN, DONALD & CYNTHIA 119.07 53.72 65.35 18.43.0600.2 RALSTIN, MONTIE & ANN 48.88 48.38 .50 10/07/2003 40.35 - 23.02.5670.1 RANSOM, JAMES R. 90.02 39.18 44.93 5.91 10/15/2003 40.00 - 6.06.9124.2 RANSOM, JENNIFER 71.66 70.68 .98 09/24/2003 65.78 - 15.21.1754.2 RASMUSSEN, DANIEL & JENNIF 102.82 79.98 22.84 10/21/2003 100.00 - 22.50.3752.3 RASMUSSEN, JACOB 76.42 59.64 16.78 10/21/2003 80.00 - 16.16.3001.1 RATCLIFFE INVESTMENTS 20.88 20.88 20.46.4300.1 RC WILLEY 419.66 204.75 214.91 1 % 1/2003 50.00 - 15.22.2280.2 REAVIS. JEFFREY 205.80 132.32 73.48 1 0/20/2003 72.50 - 15.22.1016.4 REBER. RANDALL 235.05 154.50 80.55 1 0/20/2003 76.63 - 17.33.2374.3 REBOLLOZO, JOSE & DALILA 130.65 87.84 42.81 10/02/2003 36.60 - 20.47.1090.3 RECLA. CARRIEANNE 88.25 47.40 40.85 10/07/2003 41.83 - 16.31.0840.1 REED, CAROLYN 65.4 7 57.76 7.71 11/17/2003 28.88 - 22.50.2390.2 REED, LORETTA 94.30 93.32 .98 11/17/2003 71.00 - 17.34.1792.1 REED, PATRICIA 270.25 197.00 73.25 10/20/2003 80.00 - 15.21.2704.4 REEDER, STEVEN & EILEEN 157.88 140.24 17.64 10/21/2003 117.00 - 23.02.0412.2 REID. JOHN 212.32 94.48 11 7.84 10/09/2003 107.06 - 16.31.3390.2 REIF. JANELLE & HULL, JASON 101.13 98.94 2.19 10/21/2003 26.00 - 15.21.2918.1 REYES, KAREN 131.76 91.24 40.52 11/06/2003 100.00 - 18.42.2620.1 REYNOLDS. PATRICK T 92.60 53.02 39.58 09/23/2003 40.56 - 15.22.1188.1 RICE, ALLEN 205.05 107.24 97.81 10/21/2003 102.00 - 24.04.0688.2 RICE, DANNY & AMY 82.81 40.98 41.83 09/24/2003 42.81 - 16.31.2286.3 RICH. CORY 218.35 145.66 72.69 11/14/2003 25.00 - 25.05.0720.2 RICHARDSON, HARRY & LORI 161.13 77.72 83.41 10/22/2003 81 .45 - 17.34.1182.1 RICHARDSON, MICHELLE L 84.55 56.78 27.77 09/25/2003 27.77 - 24.04.2320.1 RICHARDSON, ROD 215.18 52.00 163.18 09/17/2003 246.90 - 22.51.3154.5 RICKaRDS. SHANNON C/O 61.74 40.22 21.52 11/14/2003 75.00 - 24.04.0894.1 RITTER. RICK 74.74 36.96 37.78 10/14/2003 38.76 - 22.50.0258.4 ROBBINS, ELLEN 48.42 48.38 .04 11/17/2003 114.90 - 15.22.2072.2 ROBERTS. CATHERIN 17.75 17.75 11/21/2002 53.25 - 22.51.3300.1 ROBERTS. DAVID 115.42 42.60 72.82 10/14/2003 48.00 - 15.21.3080.1 ROBERTS, JAY 242.83 128.98 113.85 09/24/2003 107.97 - 22.50.4534.1 ROCKE, SEAN 92.53 35.30 28.75 28.48 10/15/2003 30.00 - 23.02.0970.1 ROEPKER. DAVID 82.50 46.04 36.46 10/17/2003 65.00 - 30.74.3090.1 ROGERS, WAYNE & SUSAN 69.18 34.18 35.00 10/16/2003 35.98 - 35.35.0105.2 ROONEY, BRUCE & PAIGE 116.73 42.94 73.79 09/25/2003 47.71 - 20.46.0470.2 ROQUE, ANTONIO & JOSEFINA 69.70 37.16 32.54 10/17/2003 63.52 - 23.02.4710.1 ROSE, DEANNA 166.47 64.68 1 01 .79 10/14/2003 122.44 - 30.74.2708.5 ROSS. EUGENE 86.07 42.12 43.95 10/20/2003 71.99 - 35.35.0058.2 ROWETT, BOB & DANA 85.74 42.68 43.06 10/21/2003 41 .00 - 24.03.0800.5 ROWLEY, RICHARD 94.25 46.70 47.55 10/21/2003 79.51 - 17.33.0128.1 ROYAL DYNASTY 338.49 214.38 124.11 10/15/2003 124.11 - 15.22.0914.1 RUCKER, JEAN 122.28 121.32 .96 10/28/2003 157.00 - 36.69.1076.1 RUPERT, DAVID & LAURIE 131 .54 104.94 26.60 10/21/2003 100.00 - 24.03.0046.3 SABER, ROBERT J 106.78 52.00 54.78 10/16/2003 82.82 - 14.19.7156.1 SALAZAR. DANIEL 92.26 65.28 26.98 10/17/2003 40.00 - 24.04.1436.2 SANDER, JILL 158.22 71.76 86.46 10/17/2003 93.00 - 24.04.0548.2 SAUER, DAVID 85.52 43.82 41.70 09/10/2003 91.24 - 17.34.1078.2 SAVELBERG, DOYLE 95.65 68.22 27.43 11/17/2003 35.00 - 22.51.0330.1 SAYKO, TINA 56.07 56.00 .07 10/15/2003 70.50 - 18.42.2046.2 SAYLES, BRETT & JENNIFER 143.99 76.28 67.71 10/01/2003 76.53 - 16.32.0978.1 SCHEIDELER, COLETTE 215.95 127.72 88.23 10/21/2003 73.23 - 16.32.1642.1 SCHMIT, JAMES 124.27 82.28 41.99 10/01/2003 42.04 - 30.74.3170.2 SCHNEIDERMAN, MATTHEW 101.26 51.18 50.08 10/21/2003 50.00 - 18.42.3050.1 SCHOLZ. LESLIE 124.88 50.24 74.64 09/18/2003 119.28- *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( r ( l CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 15 Standard Payment Customers Nav 18,2003 10:23am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 15.21.1870.1 SCHOPPELREY, DOUGLAS & CJ- 144.00 138.94 5.06 11/17/2003 84 .50 - 37.37.3846.1 SCHROEDER ENT INC 104.91 52.50 17.47 17.47 17.47 07/31/2003 45.82 - 15.21.0072.2 SCHWEHR, AMBER & MATT 183.72 100.70 83.02 10/01/2003 78.12 - 15.22.1636.4 SCOTT, CHUCK & TIFFANY 148.15 102.16 45.99 09/23/2003 65.26 - 24.04.2294.3 SCOTT, STEVEN & LORI 183.52 84.36 99.16 10/22/2003 160.00 - 24.03.0677.1 SECO ASSOCIATES INC 24.26 5.44 18.82 09/18/2002 14.12 - 16.31.0212.4 SELLS, CASEY 119.54 79.80 39.74 10/03/2003 39.74 - 35.35.2392.2 SEMMER, CHAD & MARY 79.21 39.18 40.03 09/16/2003 80.06 - 15.21.0034.1 SHAFER, JERRY 166.36 154.96 11 .40 10/21/2003 75.00 - 15.22.1316.2 SHAW, OWEN & CHRISTINA 124.95 118.22 6.73 11/10/2003 120.00 - 22.50.2420.2 SHAW, ROBERT 149.40 70.34 79.06 1 0/15/2003 52.00 - 16.32.0970.4 SHEARER, JOE & RENEITA 221.00 126.86 94.14 10/20/2003 192.80 - 22.50.1910.4 SHEL TRON, ROGER 84.97 47.72 37.25 09/24/2003 34.31 - 18.42.2526.1 SHEL TRON, ROGER 155.98 82.26 73.72 10/30/2003 64.90 - 30.74.3960.1 SHERARD, BILL 90.44 44.32 46.12 10/17/2003 46.12 - 32.32.4220.1 SHERBURNE, JARED 41.14 40.16 .98 09/24/2003 38.07 - 22.50.0292.1 SHOEMAKER, TAMI 221.06 56.22 50.65 68.29 45.90 09/11/2003 75.00 - 23.01.2760.1 SIEGEL, ROSALIE 34.02 33.20 .82 11/17/2003 33.20 - 18.42.2496.1 SIEMON, LESLIE 115.14 59.88 55.26 1 0/21/2003 60.16 - 30.74.3096.1 SIGMOND, SERGIO 112.00 52.16 59.84 1 0/20/2003 51.02 - 15.22.2580.2 SILMAN, STANLEY & REVA 118.58 79.16 39.42 09/16/2003 39.42 - 23.02.2500.1 SILVA, JOSEPH 113.26 112.28 .98 11/14/2003 90.00 - 15.15.0764.2 SILVA, MANUEL & MARIA 127.71 87.84 39.87 09/23/2003 36.93 - 24.04.1302.1 SIMS, ELLEN 61.66 30.42 31.24 10/21/2003 30.26 - 16.31.0778.1 SIRANI, JOSEPH A 223.79 1 39.48 84.31 11/06/2003 82.35 - 17.34.0822.1 SITZLAR, RON & GAY 85.67 84.88 .79 11/12/2003 36.00 - 23.02.0380.1 SKIVER, WAYNE D 96.88 46.97 49.91 10/20/2003 83.56 - 16.32.0962.2 SLUDER,MELlSSA 167.20 96.98 70.22 10/20/2003 100.00 - 30.74.1114.2 SL YTER, GORDON 79.13 43.76 35.37 1 % 1/2003 108.26 - 30.74.1118.2 SL YTER, GORDON 81.39 60.76 20.63 10/21/2003 40.00 - 22.50.2140.2 SMITH, DILLON & NICOLE 58.46 57.92 .54 10/16/2003 14.28 - 22.51.0498.1 SMITH, KARL 83.80 70.16 13.64 10/27/2003 85.00 - 23.02.1700.2 SMITH, LEON & JANICE 83.96 72.72 11.24 10/06/2003 50.00 - 22.50.0012.1 SMITH, PAUL H. 63.69 55.56 8.13 11/14/2003 50.00 - 22.50.0158.3 SMITH, RON 43.89 32.20 11.69 09/30/2003 6.06.1334.2 SONNEMAN, DAVID 120.73 81.14 39.59 09/09/2003 74.49 - 23.02.0180.2 SPANGLER, STEVE 58.93 30.02 28.91 09/11/2003 78.96 - 23.02.3430.1 SPEARS, BRYCE J. 254.61 125.68 128.93 10/17/2003 129.91 - 18.42.1994.1 SPEER, GEORGE 141.30 71.00 70.30 10/09/2003 76.18 - 30.74.2594.1 SPJUTE, CARL & DEANNA 194.44 120.38 74.06 10/22/2003 125.00 - 16.32.1686.3 ST GEORGE, JASON 122.19 65.28 33.49 23.42 06/26/2003 200.00 - 17.34.1166.1 STAFFORD, FRITZ 177.67 116.90 60.77 10/01/2003 61.75 - 24.03.0426.2 STAGGERS, PERRY 250.02 111 .60 138.42 10/22/2003 120.00 - 7.40.0016.2 STALEY, HOLL Y 117.10 92.74 24.36 10/01/2003 46.73 - 15.21.0200.3 STARR, DALE & MICHELLE 118.14 88.14 30.00 10/20/2003 74.81 - 24.04.1262.2 STAUDACHER, LEE 52.07 27.08 24.99 11/13/2003 25.97 - 25.05.0264.3 STElLING, BENJAMIN & LINDA 122.99 61.56 61.43 10/02/2003 85.93 - 14.19.7142.2 STEINER, LOUIS 115.62 74.90 40.72 09/12/2003 38.76 - 15.22.1048.1 STEINER, THURSTON 242.58 156.60 85.98 1 0/27/2003 73.92 - 15.22.1152.3 STEMPLE, CORY & GRAM, LORI 179.65 124.10 55.55 09/15/2003 160. 1 0 - 16.32.0792.2 STEPHANS, LEANN 134.98 73.92 61.06 1 0/09/2003 53.00 - 30.30.6034.1 STETSON HOMES 16.44 11.00 5.44 30.74.3580.2 STETTLERS, BRYCE 94.68 44.48 50.20 09/15/2003 98.44 - 20.46.0100.2 STEWART, LARRY & RONDA 101.10 54.82 46.28 09/16/2003 45.30 - 25.05.0416.1 STIEF, PATTY 112.55 48.18 51.97 12.40 07/22/2003 141.39 - ..... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( ( ~- , CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 16 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18,2003 10:23am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 18.42.3056.4 STINAR, ILENE 64.17 62.82 1.35 10/24/2003 50.00 - 15.21.0152.2 STODDARD, NORMAN 198.46 122.94 75.52 10/01/2003 165.74 - 14.14.3456.1 STONE, JEREMIAH 131 .58 83.40 41.54 6.64 10/13/2003 30.00 - 22.51.0938.5 STRATE, EUGENE 80.50 47.95 32.55 1 % 1/2003 71.92 - 1 6.31 .1 060.1 STRONG,EARNEST 318.10 64.44 76.76 85.58 91.32 08/20/2003 42.00 - 15.21.2922.3 STUART, DEAN & DIANE 311.54 161.82 143.58 6.14 10/21/2003 80.00 - 23.02.5260.1 STUBBLEFIELD CONSTRUCTIOI 54.03 25.12 28.91 09/24/2003 27.93 - 23.02.5250.1 STUBBLEFIELD CONSTRUCTIOI 65.47 30.84 34.63 09/24/2003 33.65 - 23.02.5270.1 STUBBLEFIELD CONSTRUCTIOr 68.41 32.80 35.61 09/24/2003 35.61 - 23.23.0002.1 STUBBLEFIELD DEVELOPMENT 156.87 97.69 59.18 10/21/2003 108.09 - 35.35.3042.1 STYLISH HOMES 101.42 32.64 40.03 28.75 08/18/2003 17.47- 15.21.0164.3 SULLlVAN,KATHY 238.54 123.26 115.28 10/16/2003 40.00 - 16.31.3468.2 SUTTON III, DONALD 141.12 92.88 48.24 10/20/2003 43.34 - 6.06.1914.1 SWANSON, STEVE 89.35 59.24 30.11 09/25/2003 30.11 - 37.75.0502.1 SWENSON BUILDING 28.96 21.12 7.84 10/20/2003 21.12 - 35.65.0314.1 TABBUTT, KENNETH 44.77 42.94 1.83 11/10/2003 42.94 - 31.52.0243.1 TACO BELL 108.88 42.68 66.20 09/12/2003 68.16 - 36.69.0484.6 TADEVIC, TOM 119.38 63.28 56.10 10/21/2003 68.18 - 37.37.3982.2 TALLMAN, JULIE & TROY 91.48 52.16 39.32 10/15/2003 100.00 - 23.01.3250.1 TAYLOR, DENNIS F 149.33 149.33 04/04/2003 67.94 - 17.34.1764.2 TAYLOR, LYLE & NADINE 117.72 90.92 26.80 10/09/2003 37.91 - 22.50.1020.1 TECOINVESTMENTS 112.28 58.18 54.10 10/24/2003 56.00 - 20.47.0052.4 TENNANT, ROBERT & CONNIE 131.97 55.24 76.73 10/10/2003 97.38 - 16.31.3514.2 TERRY, DOUG & WENDY 126.25 83.60 42.65 09/15/2003 86.28 - 20.46.0402.1 TESAR, TRACI 58.91 55.96 2.95 10/14/2003 43.50 - 17.34.1826.1 THAMES, DAVID & SUSANNE 98.16 88.16 10.00 10/31/2003 57.03 - 32.32.5500.1 THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIS 3,239.54 1 ,037.13 2,202.41 09/16/2003 697.74 - 36.53.0540.1 THE LEARNING GARDEN 268.08 134.57 125.99 7.52 10/27/2003 125.99 - 22.50.0350.1 THOMASSON, DAVID C 161.49 89.12 72.37 10/15/2003 162.38 - 16.32.1558.4 THOMPSON, GARY 151.62 100.92 50.33 .37 10/21/2003 48.00 - 22.50.2110.2 THOMPSON,RHONDA 110.4 7 61.94 48.53 10/14/2003 47.55 - 23.01.1950.1 THORNE, TORY 274.52 129.55 144.97 10/21/2003 122.79 - 23.01.1940.1 THORNE, TORY L 277.57 190.08 87.49 10/21/2003 88.47 - 35.35.3062.2 THORNTON, SUSAN & MARK 76.04 38.10 37.94 09/16/2003 73.92 - 15.21.2768.2 THURBER, RICHARD 200.52 134.64 65.88 10/22/2003 73.72 - 15.21.2736.2 THURBER, RICK 309.52 178.40 131.12 10/23/2003 92.00 - 14.19.4458.5 THURBER, RICK 73.27 48.28 24.99 09/12/2003 72.03 - 18.42.2544.2 TINTSMAN,TODD 191.45 78.12 11 3.33 09/17/2003 172.54 - 23.02.2200.3 TODD. RICK 70.59 39.06 31.53 10/20/2003 32.51 - 18.42.2608.1 TONEY, RICHARD & ROBIN 147.16 76.38 70.78 10/17/2003 96.26 - 13.13.8570.2 TORFIN, CHRISTOFFER 184.78 125.58 59.20 10/17/2003 61.16 - 30.74.2620.2 TORRES. PABLO 165.54 130.30 35.24 10/17/2003 43.08 - 7.40.0054.2 TRACY, DANIEL & KAREN 362.24 281.66 80.58 10/20/2003 103.12 - 35.35.7838.1 TREASURE VALLEY PEDIATRIC 187.01 82.65 96.81 7.55 10/29/2003 76.11 - 22.50.3812.1 TREGELLAS, MARK 125.17 70.76 54.41 09/15/2003 111 .76 - 9.09.0050.2 TRUCHOT. DARREN & CINDY 129.36 86.02 43.34 09/16/2003 10.85 - 23.02.2230.2 TUDEHOPE, HEATHER 105.49 38.08 67.41 09/18/2003 92.46 - 18.42.2348.3 TUTTLE, TAMI 147.48 86.34 61.14 09/15/2003 12.07 - 8.08.1012.2 ULIBARRI, VINCENT & KARLENE 91.76 87.84 3.92 1 0/21/2003 40.85 - 22.50.0506.2 ULMER, CLINT 188.50 73.48 42.81 72.21 08/21/2003 50.00 - 9.09.0168.1 UPLAND HOMES 127.87 80.32 47.55 10/15/2003 36.27 - 15.21.1828.2 US BANK 211.20 71.38 44.32 95.50 07/21/2003 48.49 - 15.21.2254.1 US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAr 105.43 4.46 33.33 32.35 35.29 08/18/2003 35.29 - 14.14.3018.1 VAIL, RANDY & VICTORIA 135.55 90.78 44.77 10/20/2003 51 .63 - 22.51.1144.2 VANCE, JIM & DERRIAN 18.86 11.31 7.55 *,u in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( ( · CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 17 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18,2003 10:24am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 24.03.0278.1 VANDERMEER, ALETA 75.72 37.94 37.78 09/16/2003 77.52 - 18.42.2106.2 VANLEUVEN,BRENDA 178.18 68.86 109.32 1 0/20/2003 115.20 - 6.06.9022.2 VANTREASE, RAYMOND & DON. 97.69 67.74 29.95 09/11/2003 31.91 - 16.31.2304.4 VARIN, ANDREW 168.39 96.34 72.05 10/21/2003 76.76 - 14.14.3506.2 VARNELL, LINDA & TERRY 193.91 129.36 64.55 10/15/2003 65.53 - 16.31.3234.2 VEGA, CRISTOBAL 200.67 10.88 80.65 51.63 57.51 23.02.2570.3 VERNON, KEN & LOUANN 141.72 54.28 87.44 10/01/2003 81 .56 - 22.50.3708.1 VIALET, GORDON 56.05 53.76 2.29 10/17/2003 34.14 - 22.50.0136.3 VICTORY, CHRIS 102.24 72.24 30.00 1 % 1/2003 95.09 - 17.34.1520.1 VICTORY, CHRISTOPHER 106.55 68.54 34.63 3.38 10/20/2003 60.00 - 23.02.1860.3 VICTORY, CHRISTOPHER 125.86 51.22 74.64 10/21/2003 51.60 - 23.02.1480.5 VIEW POINT SERVICES-AFFINIl 359.92 233.95 125.97 09/24/2003 305.14 - 15.21.0080.1 VINCENT, SPARKY 534.49 69.66 50.84 76.32 337.67 09/17/2003 75.00 - 24.04.1977.1 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS AS 211.78 76.00 135.78 1 % 7/2003 154.40 - 24.04.1955.1 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS AS 150.04 58.36 91.68 10/07/2003 102.46 - 24.04.1899.1 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS AS 295.08 1 21 .08 174.00 10/07/2003 191 .64 - 24.04.2189.1 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS AS 152.98 61.30 91.68 1 % 7/2003 133.82 - 24.04.1438.5 VIRCH, HARRY 86.05 12.74 73.31 18.42.0324.1 VIVES, MARK 104.43 58.74 45.69 10/30/2003 26.00 - 22.51.3094.2 VNUK, JOHN 49.03 48.78 .25 11/06/2003 150.00 - 22.50.3742.2 VNUK, JOHN 174.51 82.20 92.31 10/22/2003 335.37 - 20.46.0262.1 VNUK, JOHN J 126.52 82.04 44.48 10/22/2003 47.42 - 16.31.3556.2 VOGT, STELLA 187.28 136.92 50.36 10/22/2003 51.34 - 20.46.0122.1 WALCOM, MICHAEL 98.48 54.98 43.50 09/23/2003 43.50 - 23.01.2310.2 WALKER, BETTE 116.82 57.40 59.42 1 0/21/2003 75.00 - 16.31.0862.2 WALKER, BRYCE 135.72 87.32 48.40 10/01/2003 50.36 - 14.20.1398.1 WALKER, JUSTIN 133.81 83.92 49.89 09/16/2003 105.00 - 16.32.1306.2 WALSH, DAVID & CARA 133.76 90.26 43.50 10/21/2003 43.50 - 23.01.3340.1 WALSH, RON 136.52 136.52 01116/2002 29.17 - 15.22.1734.1 WALTERS, J. SCOTT 131.63 88.82 42.81 10/21/2003 43.79 - 14.20.0190.1 WARD, LINDA K 130.77 111.02 19.75 11/17/2003 50.00 - 23.01.0460.3 WARDLE, JOHN & CHERYL 80.80 50.04 30.76 10/16/2003 50.00 - 24.03.0302.2 WATTS, MELVIN & SONDEE 116.34 43.66 46.44 26.24 09/16/2003 83.54 - 24.03.0100.1 WEATHERMON, TINA 63.02 47.42 15.60 11/17/2003 25.00 - 17.33.3646.6 WEBB, HENRY & CHERIE BUCKI 92.87 59.06 33.81 1 % 1/2003 27.93 - 18.42.0462.4 WEBB, HENRY & CHERRIE 133.14 72.80 60.34 09/19/2003 1 26.18 - 15.22.1238.1 WEISS, DAVID M. 167.58 110.52 57.06 10/14/2003 58.04 - 15.21.1412.2 WEISWEAVER, CHARLES 113.47 71.16 42.31 09/11/2003 39.37 - 23.02.5580.1 WELBORN, KENNETH 92.38 38.92 53.46 09/11/2003 57.38 - 23.02.3150.3 WELKER, ROGER 261.53 172.30 89.23 10/22/2003 120.00 - 23.03.9868.1 WENDELL & KASHA LAWRENCE 351 .1 2 165.16 185.96 09/09/2003 185.96 - 23.03.9869.1 WENDELL & KASHA LAWRENCE 244.12 83.84 160.28 09/09/2003 583.20 - 14.20.3210.1 WENICK, ALLISON 139.93 94.68 45.25 10/02/2003 45.25 - 36.69.2298.1 WESEMAN, DIANE 63.92 60.00 3.92 10/17/2003 71.60 - 18.42.2284.1 WESTBY, L. MIKKI 117.42 68.86 48.56 09/18/2003 53.46 - 6.06.2146.1 WESTROCK HOMES 26.41 18.86 7.55 09/12/2003 15.10- 6.06.2136.1 WESTROCK HOMES 30.17 22.62 7.55 09/12/2003 15.10- 9.09.0182.1 WESTROCK HOMES 60.96 54.00 3.48 3.48 9.09.0196.1 WESTROCK HOMES 52.67 35.20 17.47 09/12/2003 35.92 - 22.50.3890.1 WHIPPLE, JEFF 45.84 43.96 1.88 11/06/2003 43.29 - 15.22.1256.1 WHITE, JAMES & LORI 154.16 113.98 40.18 10/17/2003 100.00 - 18.42.2492.1 WHITE, TAMELA 138.68 73.12 65.56 10/15/2003 79.28 - 30.74.0064.2 WHITSITT, JOSEPH 165.88 76.78 89.10 10/21/2003 100.00 - 15.21.1590.1 WHITTEN, DAVID 116.82 89.60 27.22 11/14/2003 40.00 - 36.69.1304.1 WILDE, KENNETH 230.18 116.06 114.12 10/21/2003 200.00 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 18 Standard Payment Customers Nov 18, 2003 10:24am Current Period: 11/20/2003 No Delinquent Minimum AmountDelinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non~Delinq 09/20/2003 08/20/2003 07/20/2003 Date Amount 22.51.0334.2 WILKE, RONALD & DOROTHY 113.19 51.76 59.47 1.96 17.34.1758.2 WILKERSON, JACL YN 252.25 148.98 103.27 10/09/2003 94.45 - 23.02.2040.1 WILLIAMS, FRED 87.30 49.12 38.18 10/16/2003 52.00 - 15.22.1742.2 WILLIS, DAVID 121.83 80.98 40.85 10/13/2003 40.85 - 15.21.1092.1 WILSON, CHARLES & HILDA 139.80 1 07.10 32.70 11/14/2003 65.00 - 23.23.3988.2 WILSON, CLINTON 107.44 53.80 53.64 10/21/2003 54.62 - 17.33.3662.1 WILSON, RANDY 121.76 118.82 2.94 11/17/2003 45.75 - 17.34.1954.1 WINGATE, DIANE 138.83 88.76 50.07 10/21/2003 51 .05 - 29.07.0880.2 WINKLER, GREG 59.91 37.22 22.69 11/06/2003 45.00 - 20.47.1204.2 WIXSON, RYAN 145.46 92.98 52.48 10/22/2003 61.30 - 17.33.4282.3 WOLIN, DALE & LOIS 82.56 61.16 21 .40 10/24/2003 30.00 - 14.14.3006.2 WOOD, DOUGLAS & MELANIE 93.57 93.54 .03 10/20/2003 47.00 - 17.34.0348.1 WOOD, STIAN 112.71 111 .36 1.35 10/15/2003 64.00 - 25.05.0284.2 WORTHINGTON, MARTIN & MEL 138.78 58.20 80.58 09/1 0/2003 128.60 - 14.19.6500.1 WRIGHT, SHEILA 190.64 119.36 71.28 09/25/2003 91.86 - 15.21.1052.1 WRIGHT, TRAVIS 294.77 1 79.14 115.63 10/21/2003 130.00 - 22.50.0028.3 YANKE,RONALD 421.60 205.40 216.20 09/15/2003 327.12 - 30.74.0338.1 YEAGER, RODERICK S. 58.72 31.00 27.72 10/15/2003 50.00 - 20.46.0350.1 YERBY,RENE 176.81 80.48 48.77 47.56 09/03/2003 49.00 - 13.13.8458.2 YORK, RICHARD 130.42 67.38 63.04 09/17/2003 65.10 - 23.02.0660.3 YOUNG, AUSTIN 157.58 39.58 70.64 39.66 7.70 10/20/2003 20.00 - 22.50.3740.1 YOUNG,DARON 98.69 51.64 47.05 10/20/2003 63.71 - 18.42.2742.1 YOUNG, THOMAS 131 .48 71 .48 60.00 10/20/2003 63.92 - 22.50.3784.1 ZAVALA, JOSE 97.50 45.76 51.74 10/28/2003 50.00 - 37.37.3874.2 ZAWISA, MICHAEL 39.32 38.92 .40 1 0/20/2003 40.72 - 17.34.0800.1 ZEAR, KENNETH 283.55 1 01 .90 181 .65 10/21/2003 78.75 - 16.31.2200.1 ZELLER,STEVEN 163.97 97.64 66.33 09/16/2003 123.84 - Grand Totals: 142,130.02 75,706.19 55,598.14 5,769.58 5,056.11 Report Criteria: Tenninated customers not included Customer.Cust No = {<} 880000001 ..* in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( ( P !Lase po s-t fw 7J~L Nv1t't( - {hM/J-S ( CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: /A.- Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer / Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to Muqsy's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: Z- Approve / Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: /0. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: ~ Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: 7'. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 - The Ewing Company: ~. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: }t- Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: -A'. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: Meridian City Council Agenda -Novel11ber 18, 2003 Page I of 2 All 111aterials presented at public 111eetings shall beconle property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accol11nlodation for disabilities related to dOClll11ents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public nleeting. 1"- ( ( 4. Department Reports: 5. (Items Moved from Consent Agenda) 6. Continued from November 12, 2003 Pre-Council Meeting: Discussion of WestborouQh Subdivision Sewer Service Request: 7. FP 03-059 Request for Final Plat approval of 1 00 single-family residential building lots and 5 common lots on 36.66 acres in a R-4 zone for Messina Hills Subdivision No.2 by Tuscany Development, Inc. - between South Locust Grove Road and South Eagle Road, south of East Victory Road: 8. FP 03-060 Request for Final Plat approval of 6 common lots on 1.67 acres in an R-4 zone for Tuscany Lakes Subdivision No.2 by Tuscany Development, Inc. - east of South Locust Grove Road and south of East Victory Road: 9. FP 03-061 Request for Final Plat approval of 63 single-family residential building lots and 10 common lots on 25.78 acres in an R-8 zone for Kelly Creek Subdivision No.1 by Kevin Howell Construction - northwest corner of North Linder Road and West McMillan Road: 10. TE 03-007 Request for a Time Extension for Recording the Final Plat for Drawbrid~e Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - west of North Ten Mile Road and south of West McMillan Road: 11. Continued Public Hearing from November 12, 2003: CUP 03-047 Request for a Conditional Use Permit to demolish existing home and rebuild one single family residential dwelling for caretakers quarters on lot 2, block 2 of Observation Point Subdivision in a R-4 zone by RF Construction - 500 East Victory Road: 12. Public Hearing: CUP 03-042 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a new Carl's Jr. restaurant with drive-thru service window by Clayton Jones - north of Intersection of South Meridian Road, East Central Drive and South Main Street: 1,3. Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Meridian City Council Agenda -November 18,2003 Page 2 of2 A 11 nlaterials presented at public nleetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring acconlmodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearing please contact the City Clerk's OHice at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public nleeting. ** TX ( . . I RMAT ION REPORT ** DATE TIME TO/FROM 14 11/14 18:01 3810160 15 11/14 18:03 PUBLIC WORKS 17 11/14 18:05 12084664405 18 11/14 18:08 8841159 19 11/14 18:09 2088840744 20 11/14 18:12 POLICE DEPT 21 11/14 18:13 8985501 22 11/14 18:14 LIBRARY 24 11/14 18:17 92083776449 25 11/14 18:18 208 388 6924 26 11/14 18:19 2888886854 27 11/14 18:21 ALL AMERICAN INS 28 11/14 18:22 208 89S 0390 29 11/14 18:24 208 3B7 6393 30 11/14 18:25 ADA CTY DEVELMT 31 11/14 18:27 8885062 32 11/14 18:28 CHERRy LANE AS OF NOV 14 '03 18:29 PAGE. 01 CITY OF J'TERIDIAN MODE M I wSEC PGS CMDJf STATUS EC--S 01' 02" 002 1374 OK EC--S 00' 39" 002 1374 OK EC--S 00' 41" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 40" 002 074 OK EC--S 00'39" 002 1374 OK EC--S 00'39" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 39" 002 074 OK EC--S 00'49" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 39" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 48" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 39" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 40" 13132 074 OK EC--S 00' 39" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 39" 002 074 OK 83--5 01' 12" 002 074 OK EC--S 00' 39" 002 074 OK EC--S 00 r 54" 002 074 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pka.se poJf. hr7~'c. ((H,.~-1hMt;.s! CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. 1. Roll-call Attendance: City Council Chambers Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless _ Mayor Robert Corrie- 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: Bill Nary Keith Bird A. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer I liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to MUQSY's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: C. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment PJant Headworks Expansion Project: D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: E. Water Main Easement for St Lukes HeJipad and Crew Quarters: F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 _ The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Jnc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering) Inc.: I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: MerfJii1l1 City CUUII..:il Ay,cIIU<l-No1O..::mhcr IR, 2003 p~ I vr2 All ml1ll:rlilb presentf;:d "'I pllbllc n'lccrfl'lz" :ih~lI bl:oCu/l"t: PruPl:I'IY of rhe ('iry l"lr Ml.1'lrJian. Anyono dcsilin~ Qccomnx'tJatiun fur tlis<tbilities felJlc.d 10 dncumcnlX ill'liJIur h~l'ill~ . plCllSC CCIlH.H:L the Cily Clerk's omcc;'JI ~88-44.U <1lle:.l~-a 4S h....u~ ptiu( 10 In~ p~thhc n'ICl.:lm~, ( ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** ( AS OF NOV 17 '03 08:58 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS 03 11/17 08:58 CHAMBER-COMMERCE ----S 00'00" 000 088 BUSY TH I S DOCUMENT IS ST I LL I N MEMORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pl&se poSi JTy PtJJiic tfp-h'te--lhMlr-s! CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: _ Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless _ Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer I Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to MuqsV's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: C. Approve / Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: E. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 - The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: I. license Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mite, Nine Mite Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: M~fidiiU1 C'ily Council Ag,,:nda -NoYc:mber IS, 2003 rCJYc 1 oj' 2 A II m~ tcrials I1rC!iCntcd at public mcclln~ ::III;.! II beel) me ).h'opcrry I')/' [he Cily of M OI"H,lIan. ^nyon~ ue~irillg UCCOIfIl)lOd~[ion lor di~biJitic$ related to dncunu::nl~ and/or ltl:uring. rl~~~c contact the CiLy Clcl'k's Oflice ilL S88-443J HI IC(lst 48 hOu($ ptk'lI' 10 th~ ruhlic I"c!.:[lng. ( ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** AS OF NOV 17 '03 14:55 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 03 11/17 14:54 Laurel MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC --5 '210 ' 40" 002 088 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PfLa.se POJt JTy 'Pu},Xic tfp-h'~-1hMlts ( CITY OF MERIDIAN CJTY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. RoH-call Attendance: _ Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless _ Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer I Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to MUQSY's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: C. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: E. Water Main Easement for Sf. Lukes Heljpad and Crew Quarters: F_ Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 - The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant VUlnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: M~fidil1n City COtHlcil Agenda -Ntlv~mber IS. 2003 {';.lye I or 2 All m::1tcl'ials t'lreSCl1lcd al public O1e\:Lmg:. ~hi.lll bec(ltlle pl'(lpcny ()f" the Cfly n/" MCI.,<.h~ln. ^nyonl: Ll~jring ucculluHodulioo tor disabilities related to documcnlS anu/l.)l.lll~i.lrjng r~I~:JhC cnn~ct the CiLY Clerk's Olne!:: tit 888-4433 allcil$( 48 hOur:; pl'i(\1' In Ih..: puhlic n'c~(Jng. ( ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** (' AS OF NOU 17 '03 15:59 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 08 11/17 15:58 Laurel MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC--S 00' 40" 002 107 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P ltase p () Sf. hr- rtJW:C tfphC(. - 1 hMl /:$ ! CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-calf Attendance: Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless _ Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird 2.. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B.. Beer I Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to MUQsv's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: C. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: E. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 - The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc,,: I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: Ml:I;dj~n tit; Cuuncil Agendi:t -No"..:mbl.:r 18.2003 Pl\gl.,: 1 uf 2 ^lll1lut~l'ia1s pr(:$enwd a~ public meetings silo II be.;om~ pt'Opcrty n" the City nr McncJi;ln. Anyone d...~frlng .:lecommod~don for d{sabilhic.s rchuod to cll.>Cuments ul1l.lIor h~arillg plc~$c CUlllilCl the: City Ckl'k's Onicc U\ 888..4433 alienst 48 holll's rri~'r 10 I he r'luhlic meeting. ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** AS OF NOU 18 '03 13:50 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 04 11/18 13:50 208 331 6466 MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC--S 00'39" 002 125 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: _ Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless _ Mayor Robert Corrie _ Bill Nary Keith Bird 2~ Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A.. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer I Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to MUQ5Y'S Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: C. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: 0.. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: E. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and CrAW Quarters: F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 - The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No. 1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: Meridian City Council Agcndn -Novc:mbcr 18~ 2003 Page I of2 All mi\reri3ls presented at public. meefiugs shall become- property of the City of McridiDD.. Anyone d~iring lUicommodntinn fnr di~blHtia; rdatod to documents and/or bt(Jring please contact the City Clerk"s Oftice 31888-4433 at Jca.l\f 48 hours prior to the public meeting. .....-r-.- f ( .-56 PAGE. 01 ** TX-, ..: I RMAT I ON REPORT ** AS OF NOU 19 '0::' CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMOO STATUS 08 11/19 00:25 3810160 EC-S 01' 2:7" 003 131 OK 09 11/19 00:27 PUBLIC WORKS EC--S 00' 51" 003 131 OK 10 11/19 00:28 12084664405 EC-S 00'54" 003 131 OK 11 11/19 00:30 8841159 EC--S 00'52" 003 131 OK 12 11/19 00: 31 2088840744 EC-S 00'51" 003 131 OK 13 11/19 00:33 POLICE DEPT EC--S 00' 5211 003 131 OK 14 11/19 00:34 8985501 EC--S 00'52" 003 131 OK 15 11/19 00:35 LIBRARY EC-S 01 ' 06" 003 131 OK 16 11/19 00:37 92083776449 EC--S 00'51" 003 131 OK 17 11/19 00:38 208 388 6924 EC-S 01'05" 003 131 OK 18 11/19 00: 40 2088886854 EC--S 00'52" 003 131 OK 19 11/19 00:41 208 895 0390 EC--S 00'51" 003 131 OK 20 11/19 00:43 208 387 6393 EC-S 00'52" 003 131 OK 21 11/19 00:44 ADA CTY DEUELMT G3--S 01 '41" 003 131 OK 22 11/19 00:46 8885052 EC-S 00'53" 003 131 OK 23 11/19 00:48 CHERRY LANE EC--S 01' 06" 003 131 OK 24 11/19 00:50 POST OFFICE EC-S 01'26" 003 131 OK 25 11/19 00:52 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 00'52" 0133 131 OK 26 11/19 00: 53 I D PRESS TR I Blt-IE EC--S 00'52" 003 131 OK 27 11/19 00:55 2088886701 EC-S 00'51" 003 131 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF l\1ERlDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1 r Roll-call Attendance: ~ Tammy de Weerd --K-- Bill Nary -r. Cherie McCandless ~ Keith Bird --CL Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: ~}"Jh1PV\(' aJ" a)n~e:0 3. Consent Agenda: Au Approve mrnutes of November 5, 2003 Crty Council Regular Meeting: ~V1<- B. Beer I Liquor license Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to Muasv's Bar and Grill- 501 South Main Street: a.-/,p't9~ C. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: apf7'1PV'<.... D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: tfi-ppre>/rC..-' E. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: affYo~ F.. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order NO.3 - The Ewing Company~ OJ J?Y'o v..c.- G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: tfJPJ>Y171M- H.. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HOR Engineering, Inc.~ a-/p'ov.<., I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight MiJe, Nine Mile laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: at r VlL-- Meridian City Council Agend:! -November J~. 2003 Page I of2 All m.1teri:lLs presented al public meetings sl~1l bt:'::Dme propcny of t.bc Clty C'lf McridUm.. Anyone des irj))t ac\.:omm0d.3tion for disabi lilies rebted (0 do CUlTlUItS 3ndlor bearing pltmc contscr rIle City Clerk's Office;;).t 88&-4433 3t l~l4g hours prior La the public mteting. ( ** TX CONFl~MATION REPORT ** ( AS OF NOV 14 '1213 18:47 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDtt STATUS 01 11/14 18:30 POST OFFICE EC--S 0'1'1212" 002 074 OK 02 11/14 18:32 IDAHO ATHLETIC C EC--S 0'0"39" 002 074 OK 03 11/14 18:33 ID PRESS TRIBUNE EC--S 00" 39" 002 074 OK 04 11/14 18:34 2088886701 EC--5 00" 39" 0'02 074 OK 0'5 11/14 18:47 CHAMBER-COMMERCE ----5 00' 0121" 12100 074 BUSY THIS DOCUMENT IS STILL IN MEMORY -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- P ILa.se PcJJf fw "Pmlic !f~-h'tt- 1hMlf:s ( CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18,2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: Tammy de Weerd Bill Nary Cherie McCandless _ Keith Bird _ Mayor Robert Corrie 2. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of November 5, 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer I ljquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to Muqsv's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: C. Approve I Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: D. Water Main Easement for Valley life Community Church: E.. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order No.3 - The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Jnc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: I. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: Mcddian Chy CuulIcil AYC::IIL1Oi -No\lcmhcr I HI 200J Page Iur 2 A II n1uu;na'~ presen led Oil p\lbllc mCcting..l\ :'\h:!.lI b=:con11: propel'l)' oJ' the Ci ry nl' McriiJi<.ln. ^nyol)o desiring accommodulion for disabilities felntcd ro docum~nL\i ilnUlur ht:nrillg flh':i1sc conLact lhe City Clerk's Onicc ;1f SS8.44.B :1l1r:l..ISl4S hour.s prior IV rhe puhlic meeting. ** TX CONFIRMATION REPORT ** AS OF NOU 19 '03 15:50 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 30 11/19 15:49 Laurel MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMD~ STATUS EC--S 1230'39" 12302 074 OK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pka.se 'PoSi fw "PiliU'c tf~1t'fX_-1hMtf:.s! CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, November 18, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1. Roll-call Attendance: _ TammydeWeerd Cherie McCandless _ Mayor Robert Corrie Bill Nary Keith Bird 2.. Adoption of the Agenda: 3. Consent Agenda: A. Approve minutes of November Sf 2003 City Council Regular Meeting: B. Beer I Liquor License Transfer from Whitewater Saloon to MUQSY's Bar and Grill - 501 South Main Street: c. Approve / Award Bid for Waste Water Treatment Plant Headworks Expansion Project: D. Water Main Easement for Valley Life Community Church: E. Water Main Easement for St. Lukes Helipad and Crew Quarters: F. Waste Water Treatment Plant DAFT Change Order NO.3 - The Ewing Company: G. Waste Water Treatment Plant Facilities Assessment and Safety Manual Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Jnc.: H. Waste Water Treatment Plant Vulnerability Assessment Project Amendment No.1 - HDR Engineering, Inc.: f. License Agreement with Nampa Meridian Irrigation District to cross the Ten Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile Laterals, and Ridenbaugh Canal: Meridian Clly CuulII.:ill\~t::1Il1\J -No\lL:mhcr I R, 2003 PG.,;,flC I ur 2 A II mUlt;rLil b pres~llled at plIhllc n1CCrl11 g..o; ~h:J.1J bc:cuml:' proJpcl'lY of thlZ City nf M l.'rltJial1. ^nyol1c desiring accornmoc.Jali0l1 rLlr disabilities ftlillcd ro documcnUi anU/ur hcnring pkes..: conlOlCt lht City C h.:rk '$ Office :11 888-44.13 .nlIC:1S1 4S huur~ ptiu( 10 ftlc pLlhlic mccti 11g,