HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC - Applicant's Presentation for 4-7
LATITUDE 43 SUBDIVISION Meridian, ID 83642675, 715, & 955 S. Wells St.Meridian, ID 83642675, 715, & 955 S. Wells St.CITY COUNCIL HEARING APRIL 7, 20260059-2024-H-PP-AZLATITUDE 43 SUBDIVISIONCITY
COUNCIL HEARING APRIL 7, 20260059-2024-H-PP-AZ
Revised Phase 2 Plan AT PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL HEARINGSSUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING ITEMS IDENTIFIED y.and ACHD is prohibited from authorizing the installation of bollards in this circumstance.
This memo was submitted to the Cit 2319-40 would violate Idaho Code Dr.ACHD indicated in a formal memo to the City that the installation of bollards or other restriction/obstruction
on Magic View –Limit Magic View Dr. to emergency access (ACHD) he City.o tthere are no planned projects in this are where we could assess a proportionate share contribution. This memo
was submitted tportionately challenging and -longer requiring a TIA for the project. They have identified that this area has constraints that make offvision proposal, ITD is no bdiITD
indicated that based on previous studies of the Eagle Rd./Highway 55 corridor, and a further review of the Latitude 43 Su–Traffic Impact Analysis (ITD) re Latitude 43 residents alike.utuinstalled
in the rear yards of homes as they are built, which will protect privacy of the existing Woodbridge neighbors and ftofor the homes along the west portion abutting Woodbridge Subdivision
will be in the Development Agreement and will be adhered. Setback language 15’setback line. Required rear setbacks of the adjacent Woodbridge Subdivision are 12’ the option of building
a covered patio up to the setback to the main body of the home but would like to retain 17’ builder of the project has provided information and plans that they are comfortable with
a minimum, as allowed by the zone. The 12’ ) that abuts the Woodbridge Subdivision will be 1 zoning area (Phase 8 -Rear setbacks within the proposed R–Setbacks line/fencing discrepancy.rtyalignment
issues will be resolved. The surveyor is gathering additional topographic information to fully understand the propes been surveyed, and any fence haneighbors, as there are a variety
of materials and conditions, and the fence may not be on the lot line. The overall propertycoordinated with affected beFencing within the development is proposed to be installed along
all perimeter lot lines. The existing fence to the west will–Fencing area.1 r the Phase founderstanding that after that meeting, the neighbors were more comfortable with the builder’s
proposed elevations/homes . It is our 1 Subdivision Phase 43 The builder (KB Homes) met with the neighbors of Woodbridge to discuss the homes they plan to build within the Latitude
–Meeting with Neighbors Builder .condition of approval, which would be submitted prior to the Development Agreement. We have included this in our presentationormalize that change as
a o fresidential lots fronting on Wells St. to be rear loaded. We think that revision improves the design, and we would be happy twere adjusted accordingly. Additionally, we received
a suggestion from staff at the end of last week to reorient the 2 and residential portions of Phase plan was adjusted to accommodate that alignment. The commercial 2 west collector
roadway, the Phase -r the eastfoBased on the City’s preferred alignment –Revised Phase 2 Plan y.and ACHD is prohibited from authorizing the installation of bollards in this circumstance.
This memo was submitted to the Cit 2319-40 would violate Idaho Code Dr.ACHD indicated in a formal memo to the City that the installation of bollards or other restriction/obstruction
on Magic View –Limit Magic View Dr. to emergency access (ACHD) he City.o tthere are no planned projects in this are where we could assess a proportionate share contribution. This memo
was submitted tportionately challenging and -longer requiring a TIA for the project. They have identified that this area has constraints that make offvision proposal, ITD is no bdiITD
indicated that based on previous studies of the Eagle Rd./Highway 55 corridor, and a further review of the Latitude 43 Su–Traffic Impact Analysis (ITD) re Latitude 43 residents alike.utuinstalled
in the rear yards of homes as they are built, which will protect privacy of the existing Woodbridge neighbors and ftofor the homes along the west portion abutting Woodbridge Subdivision
will be in the Development Agreement and will be adhered. Setback language 15’setback line. Required rear setbacks of the adjacent Woodbridge Subdivision are 12’ the option of building
a covered patio up to the setback to the main body of the home but would like to retain 17’ builder of the project has provided information and plans that they are comfortable with
a minimum, as allowed by the zone. The 12’ ) that abuts the Woodbridge Subdivision will be 1 zoning area (Phase 8 -Rear setbacks within the proposed R–Setbacks line/fencing discrepancy.rtyalignment
issues will be resolved. The surveyor is gathering additional topographic information to fully understand the propes been surveyed, and any fence haneighbors, as there are a variety
of materials and conditions, and the fence may not be on the lot line. The overall propertycoordinated with affected beFencing within the development is proposed to be installed along
all perimeter lot lines. The existing fence to the west will–Fencing area.1 r the Phase founderstanding that after that meeting, the neighbors were more comfortable with the builder’s
proposed elevations/homes . It is our 1 Subdivision Phase 43 The builder (KB Homes) met with the neighbors of Woodbridge to discuss the homes they plan to build within the Latitude
–Meeting with Neighbors Builder .condition of approval, which would be submitted prior to the Development Agreement. We have included this in our presentationormalize that change as
a o fresidential lots fronting on Wells St. to be rear loaded. We think that revision improves the design, and we would be happy twere adjusted accordingly. Additionally, we received
a suggestion from staff at the end of last week to reorient the 2 and residential portions of Phase plan was adjusted to accommodate that alignment. The commercial 2 west collector
roadway, the Phase -r the eastfoBased on the City’s preferred alignment –
PHASING PLAN
PRELIMINARY PLAT(PHASE 1)
PRELIMINARY PLAT(PHASE 2)
OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT
LANDSCAPE PLAN
IN AGREEMENT WITH THE TERMS AND 13. Agreed.-Condition 4Condition 3. Landscape Plan revisions will be completed and submitted with the future Final Plat application.Condition 2. Final
Plat revisions will be incorporated prior to submittal.Condition 1. Development Agreement will be prepared and submitted to the City of Meridian per the staff report.13. Agreed.-Condition
4Condition 3. Landscape Plan revisions will be completed and submitted with the future Final Plat application.Condition 2. Final Plat revisions will be incorporated prior to submittal.Condition
1. Development Agreement will be prepared and submitted to the City of Meridian per the staff report.AGENCY COMMENTSCONDITIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND IN AGREEMENT WITH THE TERMS AND
AGENCY COMMENTSCONDITIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND