HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC - Commission Recommendation and Department Report 4-14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--,
DEPARTMENT REPORT
HEARING 4/14/2026
Legend
DATE: Project Location CD1-
TO: Mayor& City Council Area of impact
&= City Limits '@�
FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis
208-884-5533
nnapoli@meridiancity.org
APPLICANT: Hunter Lake
SUBJECT: H-2025-0052 and ZOA-2025-0002
VanTrust -
f
LOCATION: Generally located at the southwest corner
of Black Cat Road and Franklin Road in {
the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 16,
T.3N.,R.1 W.
I. PROJECT OVERVIEW
A. Summary
The applicant requests annexation of 23.13 acres of land with a concept plan consisting of six(6)
buildings that span a total of approximately 340,000 square feet in the I-L zoning district.In
addition,the applicant requests a UDC Text Amendment to adjust the Flex Space standards to
lower the office requirement from 20%to 10%in the I-L zoning district.
B. Issues/Waivers
- Staff has met with the applicant numerous times to discuss this project. Staff has
expressed concerns including the lack of compliance with the Ten Mile Interchange
Specific Area Plan(TMISAP)in both use and design,potential traffic impacts,
probability of low job generation and lack of intended transition away from the
residential on the east side of Black Cat Road. In addition,it isolates the property to the
east leaving it the only remaining Low Density Employment property south of Franklin.
- Most of the property is designated as Low Density Employment on the Future Land Use
Map (FLUM),which does not permit industrial uses as outlined on Page 3-9 in the
TMISAP.Planning staff recommended that the applicant submit a Comprehensive Plan
Map Amendment to change the FLUM designation to Mixed Employment,which would
better align with the proposed use.However,the applicant maintains that their proposal
is consistent with the existing Low Density Employment designation based on a zoning
matrix adopted in the plan prior to the City updating the zoning ordinance to coincide
with some of the new land use types.
- ACHD and City Staff relayed to the applicant that access off of Franklin Road will not
be supported except where there is shared access with Butte Fence.As a result,the
applicant submitted a revised site plan on February 5',2026,to eliminate the small bay
City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview
industrial units along the Franklin Road frontage. This change furthered the lack of
compliance with the TMISAP and Comprehensive Plan.
Staff relayed to the applicant that we would not support the proposed UDC Text
Amendment as it is narrowly focused on a single development and does not adequately
consider citywide impacts. Staff is currently in progress with a new code change to
bring additional revisions to the Flex Space Standards.
- The home on the eastern property is currently hooked up to City utilities and entered
into a hook up agreement that requires them to apply for annexation once eligible.
The Applicant requests City Council approval of a reduced buffer width from 25-to 10-
feet adjacent to the residential use to the east as allowed by UDC 11-3B-9C.2.
C. Recommendation
Staff. Denial
Planning and Zoning Commission: Denial
D. Decision
City Council: Pending
City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview
I1. COMMUNITY METRICS
Table 1: Land Use
Description Details Map Ref.
Existing Land Use(s) Residential in Ada County -
Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial and Flex space -
Existing Zoning RUT in Ada County VII.A.2
Proposed Zoning I-L(Light Industrial)
Adopted FLUM Designation Low Density Employment and Mixed-Employment VII.A.3
Table 2: Process Facts
Description Details
Preapplication Meeting date 9/23/2025
Neighborhood Meeting 10/22/2025
Site posting date 2/23/2026
Table 3: Community Metrics
Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference
Ada County Highway District IV.0
• Comments Received Yes -
• Commission Action Required No -
• Access Arterials: Franklin Road and Black Cat Road -
Collector:Future Collector to be built
• Traffic Level of Service Franklin Road:Better than"B" -
Black Cat Road: Better than"E"
ITD Comments Received Yes;No concerns or comments. -
Meridian Public Works IV.B
Wastewater
• Distance to Mainline Available at Site
• Impacts or Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions
Meridian Public Works Water IV.B
• Distance to Mainline Available at Site
• Impacts or Concerns None
Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received or see the public
record. Paste the following link into the browser to access the public file:
https://weblink.meridiancity.org/NVebLink/Browse.aspx?id=421321&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity
City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics
Figure l: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics
Reference Parcel:51216110501 Date Retrieved:2025/12/30
Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infiii Indicator:
241 1,335 Surrounding Area
64% Not city
4k 40 ® City Limits
1,412 764.7 ■ Not City
Household Household& Population Growth
• Households
02020
Population Change:41.3°I°
Population ■Growth
(Household and Population Change
since 2010 Decennial) 2,000 1,000 6,000 8,000
Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics
Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH)
RGadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PI VI Peak Hour
Classification Traffic Count Level cf Service
` Franklin Road 761-feet Principal Arterial 543 Better than 'E"
" Black Cat Read NIA Minor Arterial 417 Better than 'E"
` ,acceptable level of service for a two-lane principal arterial is °E" (690 VPH).
` ,acceptable level of service for a two-lane minor arterial is "E" (575 VPH)-
Figure 3: Service Impact Summary
ImpactService • •
Ready O O O O O
Marginal O
Caution O
eye Ay
o °� o°a F��e ��°e a � N
�� �\ �� Qa�,c� ,<<a L°tea`
City of Meridian Department Report II. Community Metrics
III. STAFF ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC)
A. General Overview
Annexation:
The subject property is within the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) and designated
as Mixed Employment and Low-Density Employment on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). 5035
W. Franklin Road(8.52 Acres) is designated as only Low-Density Employment, and 5201 W.
Franklin Road is designated as both Low-Density Employment(4.68 Acres)and Mixed Employment
(8.91 Acres). Mixed Employment and Low-Density Employment are described as the following:
i. Low Density Employment
This use is defined by the TMISAP as low-rise office and specialized employment areas.
Low Density Employment areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for professional
offices and similar businesses. Low Density Employment areas should be designed
with elements of Traditional Neighborhood Design.Design and development
standards such as landscaping,pedestrian circulation and connection to open
spaces,are recommended to help make developments more attractive,engaging and
accessible places.Appropriate land uses include corporate and business offices as
well as research facilities and laboratories.
ii. Mixed Employment
This use is described by the TMISAP as an area to encourage a diversity of compatible
land uses that may include a mixture of office,research and specialized employment
areas, light industrial including manufacturing and assembly, and other miscellaneous
uses.Mixed Employment areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small, local
or start-up businesses, as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises. Mixed
density employment will accommodate a wide variety of employers and serve as a
primary gateway to Meridian and Meridian's prosperity.
The applicant is proposing 340,000 square feet of Industrial uses across six(6)buildings on 22.3
acres on land. The applicant's narrative states the proposed uses for the property include light
manufacturing and assembly, flex space,and warehousing and distribution. The applicant estimates
the proposed development will create over 575 jobs or 1.91 jobs per 1,000 square feet. In addition,the
applicant argues that Low Density Employment is the best FLUM designation for the proposed
development due to this development creating significantly more employment than traditional
industrial developments,the proposed uses are not noxious or nuisance like, and the architecture and
design of the site is heightened. Lastly,the narrative notes the City of Meridian and general region
have vacancy rates under five(5)percent for flex spaces.
Staff has met with the applicant six(6)times over the past year to discuss the project. Throughout
these meetings, staff has consistently indicated that the proposed annexation cannot be supported
without a concurrent Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment(CPAM)application. This position is
based primarily on the project's inability to meet key design elements and on the TMISAP's clear
direction regarding the allowable uses within the Low-Density Employment(LDE)designations
(TMISAP,p. 3-9).
While the applicant's narrative emphasizes the intent to provide a significant amount of employment,
the proposal includes a request to amend the Flex Space standards in the UDC to reduce the required
office-to-warehouse ratio to ten(10)percent office. This change is intended to accommodate
warehousing and distribution tenants,uses explicitly identified in the TMISAP as not allowed within
the M-E and LDE designations. The TMISAP's vision for this district is to create an employment
center capable of supporting more than 20,000 jobs across a wide range of industries,which relies on
higher-intensity and more diverse employment uses than those proposed.
City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis
As noted, approximately 59.2%of the 22.3-acre site is designated as Low-Density Employment on
the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). Although some industrial uses may be permissible within the
development pursuant to TMISAP p. 3-11,the LDE designation does not contemplate the types of
uses proposed by the applicant. TMISAP p. 3-9 identifies appropriate uses in LDE areas as low-rise
office and specialized employment, including corporate or business offices,research facilities, and
laboratories,none of which are included in the current proposal.
Staff agrees there may be a strong market demand for industrial uses,but the Plan specifically
says the intent of the TMISAP is to create a place that will add to the long-term economic
stability of the City of Meridian,not just respond to immediate market forces and trends (page
3-3).
In addition,staff notes that Mixed Employment(M-E) and Low-Density Employment(LDE)
designations are limited along the Black Cat and Franklin corridors. With this project included
the I-L zoning comprises 54.15% (51.5 acres of 95.1 acres) of the LDE FLUM designation and
61.28% (92.84 acres of 151.5 acres)of the M-E FLUM designation.These designations are
intended to support a mix of employment and service uses,providing a transition between the
residential east of Black Cat and industrial areas further west.
Staff is concerned that continued expansion of I-L zoning within these FLUM designations may
reduce employment diversity, create unanticipated truck traffic, and disrupt the intended
transition. Continued expansion of I-L zoning in these areas should be carefully evaluated by
the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
UDC Text Amendment:
As previously noted,the applicant proposes a modification to the Flex Space Specific Use Standards
to reduce the required office component to ten(10)percent within the I-L zoning district. The
applicant asserts that this change would better align with current market conditions and demand, and
would remove an existing barrier to leasing flex space in Meridian.
Staff is currently working on a broader code amendment to address the Flex Space standards,which
were most recently considered by the City Council in June 2025. Staff has informed the applicant that
a comprehensive code change is being developed to address inconsistencies in the newly adopted
standards;however,the applicant has elected to proceed with a separate text amendment.
Staff does not support the proposed UDC Text Amendment, as it would have implications beyond
this individual development. While the applicant notes that flex space vacancy rates in Meridian are
critically low,they also contend that the current flex space standards present a barrier to leasing,
which staff finds to be a contradictory assertion. Additionally,within the I-L zoning district,
warehousing is a permitted use that already allows an office component of up to ten(10)percent.
Adoption of the proposed flex space amendment would perpetuate inconsistencies in the code,
including land use percentages that do not total One hundred(100)percent,and would effectively
allow flex space to function identically to warehousing.
Staff agrees that revisions to this section of the code are warranted;however,the applicant's proposed
amendment is narrowly focused on a single development and does not adequately consider citywide
impacts. Staff has met with the UDC focus group to discuss proposed revisions and will be presenting
these changes to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council later this year.
Table 4: Proiect Overview
Description Details
History N/A
Phasing Plan One(1)Phase
Physical Features m� Rosenlof Canal on the Southern Boundary
Acreage 23.13 acres
City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis
B. History
Although this property has no prior development history,the adjacent properties to the south
provide relevant context for its redevelopment.
In 2021,the City approved the annexation of approximately 129.21 acres under the Black Cat
Industrial project,designating the area as Mixed Employment(M-E)and Low-Density
Employment(LDE)within the Future Land Use Map(FLUM) and zoning it as Light Industrial
(I-L). The City Council determined that the industrial center aligned with the goals of the
TMISAP. However,that development had specific site design elements such as open space,
plazas,pedestrian circulation,parkways,and tree lined streets that this project does not fully
incorporate.
Extending I-L zoning onto this parcel may further erode the planned low-density employment
transition between the residential areas east of Black Cat Road and the General Industrial FLUM
designation located approximately a half a mile west along Franklin Road. This shift may impact
the balance of employment uses envisioned in the comprehensive plan and TMISAP.
In addition,the eastern parcel included in this application(Parcel#S 1216110410)entered into a
utility hook up agreement with the city when the Franklin Road intersection was widened. The
property is required to apply for annexation once contiguous to city limits.
C. Site Development and Use Analysis
1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1):
The proposed development encompasses two(2)properties that each have an existing
residence on the property. The well and sceptic systems for both homes shall be abandoned
and the homes removed from the property within ninety(90) days of the annexation
ordinance being recorded.
2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2):
The applicant proposes the I-L zoning district for the development. The uses the applicant
discusses in the narrative include light manufacturing and assembly,flex space,and
warehousing and distribution. However,the applicant consistently discusses having flexibility
for different types of uses. In addition,the proposed UDC text amendment indicates that the
applicant is expecting warehousing and distribution as a primary use throughout the site
which is specifically listed as an undesired use in the Mixed Employment and Low-Density
Employment designations. As a result, staff believes the I-L district allows uses by-right
which are not consistent with the high employment-generating uses intended for this area by
the Plan.As a result, staff finds the Mixed Employment(M-E)zoning designation to be the
more appropriate zoning designation.
3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2):
The I-L zoning district requires a 35' street setback,20' landscape buffer along collector
streets, 25' wide buffer along arterial streets, and allows height up to 50'. The proposed
concept plan and elevations appear to meet these requirements.
The TMISAP introduces basic rules of good design. This includes buildings built to public
rights-of-way, easy pedestrian access,narrow streets to slow traffic, and the facades of larger
commercial buildings being broken down into short frontages with"big boxes"being
wrapped in smaller commercial,residential, and office uses.
City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis
D. Design Standards Analysis
1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19, TMISAP):
UDC 11-3A-19 and Comprehensive Plan Goal 5.01.02D emphasize the significance of
building frontages along public streets and/or public spaces. The applicant's proposal
complies with the requirement ofproviding a minimum of 30%buildingfrontage along the
future collector road.
However, the TMISAP calls for the LDE designation to be designed with elements of
Traditional Neighborhood Design. These design and development standards include
parkways, enhanced landscaping,plazas,pedestrian circulation, and connections to open
space, which are intended to create more attractive, engaging, and accessible developments.
The applicant's site design provides parkways only along the collector roadway and includes
pedestrian circulation throughout part of the site; however, it does not connect to the existing
ten (10)foot multi-use pathway along Franklin Road. In addition, the concept plan lacks key
elements such as plazas, open space, and enhanced landscaping.
Staff has communicated these concerns to the applicant. The applicant maintains that the
project meets the intent of the design standards through the use of landscaping, detached
sidewalks that connect to the larger pedestrian network, and building orientation toward the
street. Nevertheless, stafffinds that the project does not adequately incorporate Traditional
Neighborhood Design elements, which is a contributing factor in the recommendation for
denial.
2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B):
i. Landscape buffers along streets
A twenty-five(25)foot landscape buffer is required along Franklin Road, an arterial
street and a twenty(20)foot landscape buffer is required along the future collector
roadway near the southern boundary of the site.
The proposed concept plan accurately depicts the widths of these landscape buffers;
however, the landscaping details have not been provided. If approved, the applicant will
be required to submit a landscape plan with the future preliminary plat.
ii. Parking lot landscaping
Landscaping is required to be provided along all parking areas per the standards listed in
UDC 11-3B-8. The proposed landscape appears to meet the minimum requirements.
However, the applicant did not dimension parking stalls, sidewalks, and planters to
confirm compliance with overhang requirements.
iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses
A 25-foot wide buffer is required to the residential land use to the east as set forth in
UDC Table 11-2C-3 and 11-4-3-34F, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-
9C.
The Applicant requests City Council approval of a reduced buffer width from 25-to
10-feet adjacent to the residential use to the east as allowed by UDC 11-3B-9C.2.
Staff did not receive a letter from the applicant indicating the neighbors were in favor of
this reduction.
iv. Tree preservation
Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are
removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an
City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis
amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two(2)ten-inch caliper
trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper
trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or
greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within
common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design.
v. Storm integration
An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the
City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall
follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. In
addition,any drainage swales shall meet the requirements listed in UDC 11-313-11.
vi. Pathway landscaping
The proposed pathways along Franklin Road and the future collector roadway appear to
include five (5)feet of landscaping on both sides,meeting UDC requirements.
Given that the TMISAP includes on-street bike lanes,which is not the standard when ten
(10)foot multi-use pathways are present, staff has determined that if trees are placed
within the eight(8)foot parkway,the applicant may reduce the landscaping on the south
side of the multi-use pathway to five(5) feet.However, if trees are not provided in the
parkway,the full ten(10) feet of landscaping must be included, as specified in the
TMISAP (page 3-20, street section Q.
3. Parking (UDC 11-3C):
i. Nonresidential parking analysis
In Industrial districts,the parking requirement is one(1) space for every 2,000 square feet
of gross floor area. With the proposed I-L zone and building square footage of
approximately 340,000 square feet, one hundred and seventy(170)parking stalls are
required. The applicant is providing four hundred and seventy-six(476) spaces which
exceeds the UDC requirements.
In addition,Flex Space requires one (1) space every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.
If the entire project ended up being flex space,the applicant would also exceed the UDC
requirements for parking.
ii. Bicycle parking analysis
A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle
spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities are required to
comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C.
4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual):
Comprehensive Plan Goals 5.01.02C and 2.09.03A prioritize area beautification and
community identity by promoting enhanced design standards that result in distinct and
engaging developments.
The Architectural Standards Manual(ASM)and TMISAP require surface plane modulation
at intervals of no more than 50 feet,the inclusion of at least two pedestrian-scale architectural
features, and a combination of at least two primary field materials and one accent material.
The applicant proposes six(6) one-story industrial buildings designed with high ceilings. The
exterior materials include tilt up concrete, glazing,and metal awnings. However, it does not
appear that the applicant meets the requirement for 30%glazing along public streets.
City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis
If approved,the final elevations will be evaluated during the design review process to ensure
compliance with industrial design standards.
5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7):
All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The submitted
concept plan does not depict any fencing; however, any future submittal shall depict any
proposed fencing and a fencing exhibit.
E. Transportation Analysis
1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4):
Goal 6.01.02B of the Comprehensive Plan prioritizes reducing access points on arterial
streets through strategies such as cross-access agreements, access management, and the
development of frontage and backage roads.Additionally,it emphasizes improved
connectivity between local and collector streets.
Access to the site is proposed from a future collector street near the southern portion of the
site and an emergency access points off of Franklin Road. The emergency access is proposed
to be shared with the western neighbor(Butte Fence).In addition,the applicant has stubbed a
frontage road to the property to the east to allow for cross access in the future.
ACHD and City Staff determined that the only access to Franklin Road is the shared access
with Butte Fence. As a result,the applicant edited their site plan to eliminate the two(2)
frontage buildings along Franklin Road and expand their large bay industrial buildings. This
then shifted all of the access points to the collector on the southern portion of the site. ACHD
indicated that the anticipated trip generation is 1,119 vehicles per day.
In addition to this, staff has discussed concerns regarding the transportation network in
the area and the addition of unanticipated freight traffic onto Franklin Road and Ten
Mile Road.As a result of these concerns,staff has put together a table below
highlighting developments that have been approved within the Ten Mile,Black Cat,and
Franklin road network.
The applicant is responsible for extending the collector road as outlined in ACHD's Master
Street Map. ACHD found that the proposed development meets all of ACHD's policies.
Table: Road Infrastructure and Developments Along the Black Cat/Franklin Corridor
Category Details
Existing and Planned Road
Infrastructure
W. Franklin Road Existing: 2 lanes, no curb, gutter, or
sidewalk.
Planned: Widen to 5 lanes between W.
McDermott Rd and S. Black Cat Rd after
2028.
S. Black Cat Road Existing: 2 lanes,no curb,gutter, or
sidewalk.
Planned: Widen to 5 lanes between W.
Overland Rd and W. Franklin Rd,2036-
2040.
Franklin&McDermott Intersection Planned: Multi-lane roundabout,
construction scheduled after 2027.
City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis
W. Franklin Road Connection Planned: Future connection to SH-16 via a
signalized intersection.
Approved Developments Impacting the Full Impacts of these projects are yet to be
Corridor realized.
Black Cat Industrial (H-2021-0064) 2.2 million sq ft of industrial space to the
south.
Farmstone(H-2023-0045) 378,360 sq ft of commercial and industrial
uses across Black Cat Road.
Avani Subdivision(H-2023-0049) 256 residential lots to the northeast.
Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) 552 dwelling units and a mix of commercial
and industrial uses(approximately 740,000
square feet).
Braya Subdivision(AZ-06-061 and PP-06- 330 single-family lots and 240 apartment
062) units.
District at Ten Mile(H-2023-0071) Large mixed-use development with
approximately a total of 1,000,000 square
feet contemplated.
Outer Banks(H-2021-0025,H-2021-0061, 516 residential units and approximately
and H-2024-0026) 147,650 square feet of commercial.
The Gateway at Ten Mile(H-2020-0046 390 residential units and 26.54 acres of
and H-2024-0010) commercial.
Totals: Residential: 2,284 units(Most of which
have not been built)
Commercial/Industrial: 4,318,360 square
feet(Most of which have not been built)
Traffic Impact/Construction of Collector from Proposed Use:
The applicant anticipates approximately 575 or more employees on-site daily,with ample
space for semi-trucks and freight to access the site. To align with UDC 11-3A-3,which seeks
to limit access points to collector and arterial roadways, staff recommends that if approved
restricting the central access points off the future collector street to truck traffic only.
Additionally, a traffic impact study was not required due to the estimate trip generation for
the development; however,the applicant indicated that they completed a driveway analysis
which restricted the access points onto Franklin Road to only the shared access point with
Butte Fence. As previously noted,this significantly impacted their site design.
If approved,the applicant is required to construct the future collector road along the northern
portion of the site in accordance with the TMISAP Street Section C exhibit. If trees are
planted within the eight(8)foot parkway,the applicant may reduce the landscaping on the
south side of the ten(10)foot multi-use pathway to five(5)feet. However,if trees are not
placed in the parkway,the full ten(10)feet of landscaping must be provided,as outlined in
TMISAP (page 3-20, Street Section Q.
2. Multi-Use Pathways,Pathways, and Sidewalks (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8 and UDC 11-3A-
17):
The applicant is proposing to construct a 10-foot multi-use pathway along both sides of the
future collector and along Franklin Road. This is consistent with the UDC standards and the
City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis
city's pathway master plan for this area. However, it appears part of the pathway along
Franklin Road will not be in ACHD's Right of Way.As result,the applicant shall submit a
14-foot easement for the portion of the pathway that is not in the right of way.
F. Services Analysis
1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6):
The Rosenlof Drain runs along the southern boundary of the site. The applicant is proposing
to leave the drain open as they will not be impeding access to the irrigation canal.
2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15):
Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the
development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15.
3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18):
An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's
adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best
management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18.
4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21):
Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by
the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G&
3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required
to be provided with development.
IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS
A. Meridian Planning Division
No conditions of approval, as City staff is recommending denial of both applications.
City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions
B. Meridian Public Works
wosrr,rato.
•
orstanoetoSewer AvalablveSi*
s.r+w*L
• k eef5hed
• EAFMOL4PMeCO Sieeapplk on
SehIL�l4'ERU's
+ WNFfO4N1imng
Saunw
PrnfertCIMSiStera Was
wish Vfw LL45tft
+lirl i[1 Iyir�
i Impif[ts�[ntL€z+ns •
We FLPW.c V0wk%S:tr €1Gc CDr dltkmA
wateL
• 6SurhLe to WM& ylairr Awdah**tlpt•
Svryw"
• REVA re Zone
s 1i7111neiW PfgJo€1 SLv 20PIL WIM
water ERU'S
+ WMWQLielrgr 149M
ProlrtdtC6,edtit*.re xes
wrh water Mau&
pLion
as{[nT�oerrs HarLe-
NU%-PLAT CON DITIONS
�il.Ts 5�'oiLs:spr.��ai�lfr�
okr SRrsifir C'ondKaw id Apprerd
I .-%ILs v.*-I I,LIhNI will:MLrl CwILLinuk tt%k LAIe-O hu¢Tbt IYE"ly fLh"Ue�d jecMdtrno Tu 16ho
Well Caestrur6kv SCudards Rules ndmimisrncd h'Y the IdshkF Departn mt K Wsi r
Resources f IDW R I The Detelglrer,0%ILer,or ML en Effodleer.Oatl pmvide,a saimmi
addltuirlE whalut Ihm mreany c.%kuag Krll+in thedkvd slarnG,"ikmu,lww"WY 1&111
contintrew he used.ne amide retard nF dieiT ahw&wnient Kweals areto be ahwd(ned,
ale projeKt 01MOV Of rlieir repreS0Lfjt1ti2+past CtrL'Wl dTe ll)WR GIuWWWaLO PraLeL L*
Soctian {Aaran 5kinau, Ilr4&0gaal0jist ML29741P721 4117FDRE mnw -. iwk is dune ii*s
decommission an CLising well leven if it is b-ekeved Thai The well ig leis ihm 18 IN d"I
r[�odof c(allnauKlicati€n with IDWK mrsr be mtbmimd w the City prior w mnx wiv%bong
6crwto*mzmissism 1Wue6 FTrlureevepmmunic"wiih IT)WR mat,resuh in MMiIianal
work at1dOPMW 11.4NPOH-i$si*.r dK Well
Z. F.aTirL:TTousrrtr ssrvires I,ILsa iht:wgh iilfilaatinl irrnrhn
City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions
1 PhrhMe IV�FIwwthosiv(m tL•Imm.Il;*wt L%Lmk wJ%juvp qe Llee% Fawfoenl.,Ikmid%-h3enJ
up iudw Ldd of Fazio hkd L-wmLi mem and IU'f�uihd 3L
5 Flo petlibmm saLlou"fu=.lsLnhe■,bui3il1tilL'1 Ctsrpurls.LrAl h r1XLVIKk-w101A,(01.'es,
mfiloalim t7MVhE--Iighe poles,ex.)to be buile%iihln thr kid Tiny casement.
{;racial C*9di1i4ras of Approval
I Appllcwis shalt WzmftbdgLr wodci and wY ci ni.ui slime aid Fuufimu wiffi llw PuWIc%k urks
dcpanrnraE
i. P.!r ldef,draa C.Ly Co iV[xl[Ck Lhu appluill Ail.bf rehPLNnSIUIC Lr.L11A33I wo er aml waver
mniws m and lllMwLFpls ih i91feaL *rdfaL AMiCML iaa4 LlteNphWe fo•a rr-nl lnt4ytFro6
]s3 C4'}'r•IVnL tkn wirafJRL low 4mb>•Lprmsml Fier R9L.-( w-&3
I FILL'aM511CM1 OWII labs idt ila.cmL=4)for all(aline wlifri'Wewi roaiYly owisidc of Fu6lie riyhi of
w:i4-IInglW� JOI w•a L9w U9MicC ;wJ Iwrdrnw). �ww4r WM0 ea-;�M4'nl VWLLi*wulz•q wwcw
dcpla crw it 0-N fl&rp rrrlulii:o mF A F*wimmi.3w75 R,aJF H ca srinrnl."24..in f1 a JI rk
CM9Mq!nL It apwm no pL••rn micst S4rm1Ar4L54lrra5.bwNs.baildmNS.cagvit5.aw.h TCc49LwJv
w raw,khces,intilmdiah LIf Ars.fight poles,ew.1 arc Imp It x•Iih IIL Lark uh11LV czwr'ncml Submid
in e%ccwed emcmem Jrm Lhe form"Idbk firm PublLc Jkscrvion prgmE:rd by
am Idahm LLcpnL¢d Ptufummopl Ljed SLFr;oW,wlli4h FILLFLL iFIL IU*the]Ira Urdu ciLwillml.
,marked EXHIBITAlandin RI 2-x 1 I"map mithbaaungs aW digAwccs fmated EXHIBIT BI
JSrmil,cw.Said pxl111¢ItLFdusLbf JLpnlgd.FigWd andddlad by a PturculurkJ Lad Suff,c}aL.W
NOT RECORD.
-1. The CiLyaMrMlw requima am pfrswwwd eHl4pd LOLS%}*LemL he LLFpp6L•d by agcr.ruLicid
wLrea ofv/aicriUDC I L-31R-4 The appliewcsLDdJbc mquiFed Lasmc aav erisling surricg cw
wlVe k4ss for Lr p�W'y&OLLP e. If a i4wWk!ur wQM s6Ler4 is Fql a 31ilahi4,##Fnlr�'Pl m
e;wwai oik to1Lt culinary wam sy*=d3a11 be rcguircd IF oiaµlc-piuni conatica i9 661irai
L6e deva3g14r WWII INC Fos ii6k foe die paymmi.amLFxmu lines for Lha aomnLlaL Imm ps to
pLwt io fsfrr o"dnrIapft vtti plan a(h ;II
3. AnV xlualLros 0411 are ntk gk%.vd Lu rumarn sknil ix s biw w a+'aµwliam and wpsl bk mapsigitimeat
of FMVI sdJM"MkC no-ha sn ernnpllaiwv
A. ALl imgaFvn digfi s.c la&.Ir cnis.ar draiRE,cmIumvc of Nwn,I-al — ms.,nleRaclinp.
0~p otlo.vmS pdFacclW and oonLltrwnuf w Lhr itra 4L11dlsL.brd Lhdi Lx addnr"rsi per
VDC i E-]A L6. to p ari m4nµ such%e J r�,the wplica i.shall comply. wish fdaha C ie 47-I N7
01111 ady 0&&t MWICAUL:law'nr nguladon
7- An wklLsihm w0l rkm con inut Io bf Lard rnim be peoperh'alwrdooed xcording*Tdaho Well
CuoYeucimA SLoiddrb Itoles mlindEnLOICd lby Lbe IA3ho Lkpwinwid of AMLL'I Itewwe%
iTDu-RJ.the Ucvclaper-Ovrncr.orpmjecr Errginccr-sh2A pro,We i sImemcrLLaLldrtisiap
wlkyber lkw W OMti csjAkm y CLls m the&%-CkpLbM4 ILA if to-tKM dwy wilt c1mumb Lu he
L"or twyidk rut' -of&Lir ahStldowALlll.IfxeLh arr aio Lst abAt&HLA.Eh4 pn,j�i L5L5♦w fei
Lh neii Pfta.,LL MVL s L"ALarl LIW IIIJUL 61 dM ab=II`1UW !U3 SLL'Eloa IMann hk!m .
!%tropoingiu MR-28749712 l MFORF.any Rod k dLmr w deeommis4m ia1 atirwnp w ell
idves I F h rx L$0hCL'C/11ud tha iurlL LG leas OW 15 fX&Cr}Tfodo of awnrnambuau"utilh IDW R
+h Lw4 IK 1wKidi eJ eo iha I.'y prwr iLJ avly wwi kwing dlaoe hi dfeumpm-+v I he wrlq Fallen w
gprnrnr11 %!wuh IPWR uLvlyT=hl rn p0411rLwW wWk NMJ PLPMU 994C1:I1mmL%HPn IhC WUH
A AHq cAmirR ItLoi;by Aerm Vndhit irri pro"Cl abidl blw fwtluvM fhsrh wr%icu M(Av I lidlnnhtc
Scam 4-1-4wA Q 4 K. Comic Cenmal Diicrm Hca:M for oL>wdwrocM procedures and
Flriplrchnm I' IFP173•S I t
9- All Lmprmcments rtluGrd to publte II fc-saki.v and hrallh sh313 bt O(mplMd pfior to cc'cuparlC�
Of Ilk alFact M%.
10.Appllemi shall he uMdM w pie Public WodL ,lies clvprxni pLw 3rL ww.and eonLiElnf bn
iftmk m Frey,rr ihurenliecd during die pl,ui w%ipu prnrcu,piigr Jq aw LCL mKc 0 n ply
apprem al.IHttr.
City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions
I L h atull br dhc twg%mub111r4 ordw arLpoltrar ur sebum Ihal Ail de4clL3twm6wr k-upwCN aamlq.v Wilt
Lk AmLCL.-MIS wlrh Dumbrk6i;-S ACI and aw Fae HN,:Lift.Am
12.App wwc 4;011 k imp mobIg Am*ghvileedK}ll and 6Lomplwu4 rrr11L art SLxtl{In m4 PlermmurK
"vav ter n'qumc4 b}'Ow Amy Cpeps of n jpicCrs
13.i}ntdopor 499{WP&nbw mudbdx lvaueLon!n Nh L%2 MJEMIM!Leis Ofkt
14,CowF"i wr Ic-L r451L!'s sWl tw skatouLied to tlrp Ml,W ml Ituitdmg flrPsrrnUFA L'ar*11 bkEUint
pddtvxn+lnR rg1hrtird trdekAll,sklr frklrulg L4%dJ slr clop MId nrdLeT,yL.
15.Ths dl¢sign coglrieer shall h reTil red is"rift rhal ik simrl ra1L1l'dl4r.cdvvw"s am gn a
rrLlhrmum of)-feet Ahwr rho IrrghLsl VdNllhrd[WA gI-L%M l;rler rltvu" Thin reruem art
rhal ibe bmborrl dtvmLgm of ibczrrn I spares ctfkornr4 is am IcaP I-ft"okw e.
Is. the appolertlltu deSlE-Y tlleanLer shdl Et rnNmmblc ror uISgC6N.O4 Of all iwr FF a an and or
dralrr-Lpr Whry witbim 11m5 pmicsl dul da nq1 fA Ll.der the joirdirmam Pfan in igglion d.d.sItrirl
Or At_'HD- I�1 Ile degq-A uLeMeLy 411al1..I,,. Jti L rrL`GCru,n Blaa m{faL,Ll uss hdic km Id1 Ied rr
a mdamet wide the apprm%,d k%i 1 1 r+xhuFcmLoa w41 k rcqurnd before a 4tni Fcaw
Of 00Cu17WCk L%3NN Cd G51 AM SLNL'LLJ I'll:L13L PKIIII.Lt
17 •tL du.wnvlo"of ch%t 1"j6,ri.floc.r p. NaLl Jw NL%Wl.wble la µlbw.ir kwrd*W!.Yagf Isrr
Lk-Cav of MLlbd3m huiLl Ab adrvk rd% L bce ra Fd dmwims most h,moored and appm%xd
prkid lo she k%vrricuof a cr;reiFraLismuf fxavpwvw for urar 4Il'Lrfrurr.nmiLrn Ilk pLeyt,rl
19.A 9&bxl laQhL p1mL wail neLtd Ih be Lrwdud d m Lhbe unil c0nq uL7,x�m�Iptm!4.SArL Y hghr ply
rtgwivm shi.ti art Ikivd 11r%"Illy h-�41rAc lmtw%14rMICIr1 Ndti11wdi kr 4nc I-.Uht$ A cllft
ofihr r,1wK rds can See found al Okla wn-m.mmdisrc�lvx
IQ. nu NY of MOMiarr reLJL■PVN LhdL Lire%NVL'Mr 1xWr Lo rha LrLy aperRrsnulret NUCP 10 the anwLurl
of I2q%cfrllc+olal com-nwwL ens.For a1 I it rn*w*ear*.wnw arfd.ease In$- rip re
pnmx w illlul pLm elyuwrc. MID bVilly will t)L I Cl16LJ bi a I Ihr 110n:osl tiumare PW%'E sd by
rhrr owner w Lbe C-]L5 The sumo can k L P .vied in 1hr Form of an irrrs oenbkeur IeI oo ofmLdii-car
Lmd w depcnh ell b Appheam au Llle an spphcalwm Iar ymyp,�fi ILh ualr kLoon-.I LhL
Qw m llnir4 Ck+;Iapmrni Pelvnrn,ml-rh+ire Plmrc Como Land DuCIPpmsnr Service for
Mo=Ltlkgimuli.r)M al"7•*'1 L.
;(l.Thei4v of Mc.tdian reqlwrcL d ar Lire n+L,K r pws Lv rIL4�LIS r><umnry SLR'I+in 11K amaLweL 4f
20%of Lhe uatf,oft uu.wat Lcii for:r1L LOML*LLLd hti Li-wALL7Ard CLuar I:11:A4 WJLB&L IN
duratilon of lym yL:m Th1.w iviy-A M Lle- ri Grd llx 2 Irm iaerr wha catin: !A by iht
mwmrr I4 dre Cmv.r�fl ty m tee p igLed in Llx tern of r vmw+p Alo' 1 J,It,rwh
46parir or band AppL,cnan nLLM 01e ar agLl WWIlKLr1 Q4,INtry,WhICh ran 1 1 lhg
C(migilmly DC'LYjopWn4 Ugw1rri Mt%Tb51tC PICax nw&io Iarrid Cl,%%,.I,:.-)1'1TViCC fi)F
ruff infmmaude a xdr7.:2I I.
City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions
C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD)
,%-�CQ PWLUOM
ACHDlone{,�yp.h Le�nm W rwir
J LWw N'JU V&S— Cammwaar
evhrloa Hficcory ConmlcYc�
Date:December 21,2025
To:Komori McNel li
Staff Contact:matt Pak Plan ner
Ptojerl Desrriptiom VanTrust
TnpGentieratlon: TArs development rsescrrn"d to generate 11�119%VhlcWtrgm per day.
152 vVOCIN trip p*r havF In th•PM p"K hour.baW 40 the I rhotilum Cf Tra++spunat iwt
Engineers Trip Generation Manual.12"edition-
NOTFaffk Impact Study
Ar4iiho roads will n�m
the futura with planned
No
Comments The tables abowe lija the exigting conditions ofthe surrounding
roadways without the proposed development as this application isforannexation
and ryron*onry,with a future O*vwWpment sPP`estion.Olt wmmary will bcr
wpdated IQWe4Ct the OewW -ent and its impact
connectin!q you to more
+decw^b'wiqh*yD-lmGt-Few NrawgrAny, -wdw.1D-{6yiF-Pox*-w'L4 4-rKFW-MA-v.�.r,�p�ldgl�q
V. FINDINGS
A. Unified Development Code Text Amendments(UDC 11-5B-2D)
Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and
shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a text amendment to the
Unified Development Code,the Council shall make the following findings:
1. The text amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan;
The Commission finds that the proposed text amendment is not consistent with the applicable
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan calls for updates to the
Unified Development Code (UDC) to implement the Plan's adopted vision. This includes the
City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings
TMISAP, which does not permit industrial uses such as warehousing, distribution, and
manufacturing within the Low Density Employment designation.
Additionally, the TMISAP states that its intent is to create a place that contributes to the
long-term economic stability of the City of Meridian, rather than simply responding to
immediate market forces and trends (page 3-3). The applicant is proposing a citywide code
amendment to accommodate a single development proposal, which would have broader
implications for the City as a whole.
Staff has informed the applicant that the City is currently working with the UDC Focus
Group to evaluate and update the flex space standards. Despite this ongoing effort, the
applicant has chosen to proceed with the proposed code amendment at this time.
2. The text amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,and
welfare; and
The amendment would reduce the required office component for flex space within the I-L
zoning district to ten (10)percent and would apply citywide. The Commission does not
support the amendment because it would create further inconsistencies within the Unified
Development Code, including land use percentage allocations that do not total one hundred
(100)percent, and would effectively allow flex space to function identically to warehousing.
Such inconsistencies undermine clarity and predictability in the City's development
regulations, which is not in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare. While
revisions to the flex space standards may be warranted, they should be addressed
comprehensively rather than through a narrowly focused amendment.
3. The text amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any
political subdivision providing public services within the City including,but not limited to,
school districts.
The Commission finds that the proposed text amendment may result in broader citywide
impacts because it applies to all properties within the I-L zoning district rather than a single
site. The amendment is narrowly tailored to facilitate one development and does not
adequately evaluate potential citywide implications. Staff is currently preparing a
comprehensive code amendment to address flex space standards and related inconsistencies
and intends to present those revisions to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council later this year. Proceeding with a separate amendment at this time could complicate
implementation of coordinated updates to the Code and affect how development is regulated
and serviced across the City. Accordingly, staff finds the UDC Text Amendment will have
adverse impacts.
B. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E)
Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,
at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the
council shall make the following findings:
1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan;
The Commission finds that the applicant's proposal to annex 23.13 acres with an I-L (Light
Industrial)zoning designation for the development of six (6) industrial buildings totaling
approximately 340,000 square feet is not consistent with the Low-Density Employment
FL UM designation. The Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP) envisions Low-
Density Employment areas as low-rise office and specialized employment centers, including
corporate and business offices and research facilities.
City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings
The applicant's proposal does not incorporate these types of uses and is instead industrial in
nature, with warehousing and distribution serving as the primary proposed uses.
Additionally, the TMISAP calls for Low-Density Employment areas to reflect a traditional
neighborhood design that includes convenient circulation, buildings that frame streets,
plazas, and engaging open spaces. With the most recent revision, the applicant has not
adequately addressed these principles, and the proposal therefore does not align with the
Comprehensive Plan or the TMISAP.
2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district,
specifically the purpose statement;
The Commission finds the proposed map amendment complies with the regulations outlined
in the I-L zoning district. However, the proposed I-L zoning is not consistent with the
comprehensive plan or TMISAP.
3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and
welfare;
The Commission finds the proposal to annex of 23.13 acres of land designated as an
Industrial Employment Center, accompanied by a concept plan that primarily reflects
warehousing and distribution uses may be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare. This is due to the potential loss of significant employment-generating
opportunities, a proposed use and design that are inconsistent with the Ten Mile Interchange
Specific Area Plan (TMISAP), and the possibility of substantial traffic impacts on the existing
roadway network that have not yet been fully evaluated.
4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by
any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited
to, school districts; and
The Commission finds that the map amendment will not result in adverse impacts as City
services are available to be provided to this development.
5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city.
The Commission finds that the proposed annexation is not in the best interest of the City.
Early in the review process, staff recommended that the applicant pursue a Comprehensive
Plan map amendment to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)designation to Mixed
Employment or General Industrial. The applicant chose not to pursue this option, asserting
that the proposal could comply with the Low Density Employment designation standards.
However, the applicant has not demonstrated compliance with those standards and is
proposing uses that the TMISAP does not permit within the Low Density Employment
designation.
Additionally, the cumulative traffic impacts within the broader TMISAP area including 2,284
residential units and 4,318,360 square feet of commercial and industrial space have not yet
been fully realized, as much of the approved development has not been constructed. The
TMISAP states, "The City knows that this is one of the last remaining large, contiguous areas
of highly visible, easily accessible, and developable land within the City ofMeridian's Area
of Impact."Staff does not support development in this area that is inconsistent with the
adopted vision of the Plan.
For these reasons, staff concludes that the proposed annexation is not in the best interest of
the City.
City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings
VI. ACTION
A. Staff:
Staff recommends denial of the proposed Annexation as discussed above in Section III,per the
Findings in Section V.
B. Commission:
The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 5`h, 2026. At the public
hearing,the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject annexation and UDC Text
Amendment requests.
1. Summary of Commission public hearing:
a. In favor: Deb Nelson, Chris McClusky, Tyler Martin
b. In opposition: Keith Whiting
C. Commenting
d. Written testimony:None
e. Staff presentinggpplication:Nick Napoli
f Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons and Ali Breshears
2. Key issue(s)of public testimony
a. Tyler Martin was in favor of both applications. He claims the product being presented is
in high demand across the valley and more specifically in Meridian. Most users looking
for industrial space would like to be in Meridian due to its central location. In addition,he
believes due to the non-noxious uses that would be in this development that it would
support the intended transition from the residential to the east and industrial to the west.
Kieth Whiting was in opposition of the project. His main concerns were extra noise and
traffic in close proximity to his family. livingdirectly to the east.
3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission:
a. The Commission discussed issues with a case specific UDC Text Amendment change,the
lack of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, and the lack of a traditional
neighborhood desi. The Commission was unanimously against the UDC Text
Amendment as they felt it only addressed a need for a single project without looking at
the impact to the larger city. The Commission agreed with staff that a CPAM application
would be required in order to support the project. They also agreed with staff that the site
was lacking key design elements to meet a traditional neighborhood design that is called
for in the Low Densitmployment designation.
4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation:
a. None
5. Outstandingissue(s)for City Council:
a. -Whether a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment should be required.
-Whether the annexation is in the best interest of the city with the current plan and FLUM
designation.
tion.
-Whether the UDC Text Amendment is appropriate.
-Whether the applicants design meets the design standard requirements for a Traditional
Neighborhood Design.
-Whether the proposed uses are consistent with the TMISAP for the Low Density-
Employment designation.
C. City Council:
Pending
City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action
V IL EXHIBITS
A. Project Area Maps
(link to Project Overview)
1. Aerial
Legend
Project Location rl
;:Area of Impact
OAnalysis
10
�tM
2. Zoning Map
Legend � j
Project Location RUT R-'
Area of Impact R=2 R_8
O Analysis Rl KIF 0�
TN-R
0 0 R1
=:r C
C-C
loom,_
R-40
R-15
r
I-L r
M2
M-E C-G
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits
- - 1• I'll � ��
• e - Q iyy, uru��
• I _ �(Fill.r\ �(�
O � F���IIIIIIFIi 111
I r
I I Q
kds•iA,
' i - FRANKUI�N
I .¢tllflllll
I-
.
6 • e —
I • •
- �84 -I • - .
■
■■■■■■■■■ � '•:mil�=•::: :::s:IIL,IL'1t11111 11
♦��.a •lllfnll aunt•:+nr•� -
�1111�.�iF11i�_����.Ii111�11111\%III
�• �jl"wI•a �111 Ilu•m
V 'lllllllll ��1 ■Ilrl'ill�ll�ll�f,,w III I^i,llllEll
m N� nnn=___an e7lnuuH G 7y•w l
a '• • - ^.�� lierylrrnn LilglA�llxlgtlmnu"nuunnn
__ n+ nnIIIIInIIn1Rn{IpP:n..
W
mills
+A all■
�J
y � `1� FRANKLIN
1 '
Ming�Ills
fl �;��
lFf�
IIIIr1nlurrnr ��
1 1 � :IIlIIE IITn�=�rir71711
C IIIIIn3�lIL--_
- I_EEIIIIIIIA;
-
111111111111111 .Ilpllll
�� 84. 1
B. Subject Site Photos
Alm-
Yi.
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits
f
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits
C. Service Accessibility Report
PARCEL S1 1 1105 1 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY
Overall Score: 1 �2ncl Percentile
Location Within 112 mile of City Limits YELLOW
Extension Sewer Trunk-shed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN
Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or> 2 acres GREEN
Emergency Services Fire Response time > g min. RED
Emergency Services Police Not enough data to report average respon}e tiine RED
Pathways Wrthin 1/4 mile of future pathways
Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN
Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration(#of lanes in master streets GREEN
plan) matches existing (#of lanes)
School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN
School Drivability Not within 2 miles driving of existing orfuture schoo' RED
Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED
City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits
A Site Plan (date: 2/5/2026)
+ram ,., TIE
�fi. _ � �- I• � 91k
_ d w
—W
1 R m
ON
aMne:aiiaa-Conupwai oe�ci�ment Plan {{ "�"
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits
E. Building Elevations (date: 11/4/2025)
T T Y 4 4 4 q
I
.;w._
ii '
11
i i 1
T 4 ? 4
6=_ _. - - - .I �
i n
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits
Mani.
+;N
r
• __ r
0
n �
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits
F. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map
ILMALUESMPTH M
+f THE Ric 1 Of
LAND
AmeM GROOP
%KI Z5
FroW No.11*A145
EKHE f'JL'
CJTY OF MERIDL4N
ANNEXATION GE_CRI PTKIN
THRUSTON♦HO F5RNIE SUGONUION
Aparodat land$5cAxdIn Ube Fluttrtast$srterofiheNordrt QarteratS"i__1E,Towlshlp3
NN-ch.Rwfgn 1 Wes[.Bdse Maaban.Ida Canty,klafp.6crW more parUcula,i/descrlbed as roars
CommenaN at Me Ned:heast Crrlwat 5omlon 15 of sold Tawrslslp 3 NeM,Range J West,4tlaln
whWh paint the Naft One Oysrlta Cacr"of said SmIlda J6 bears ftlaM 89'24'12'Wait.M 41A2 k#
dlsks
Thor Ilecth 851422'Was#,a disc r e ot*9.5.26 root on the rmraa bctinda+y krr or said Sodlon J6
and trrt euTt Mlnc d West Fr Mln Road to the POINT OF BEGINNIMG,
Thenkr°.aUkh OLI'40'11"Welkr a dstandr of 13,2&WILet w a pWrrt on the conbedlne at the
1lasanka Draw
I hence North W 21'1G'West,a Aktanao of 75&36 teat em sad ccrAellrc�;
I hence North 4LT'99'13"Last.a dkiame at 133B.16tort to a pokk on said nuih bowdry fne;
TMPn South S4'2A'11"East,a dlstsnce at 7S&9,4 toot on said north le o day Ync bo the POINT
AF BEGINfM3-
The a4arc deserlb rd easrmtnt ourtalns 23.13 aeres Irrtxc ork>t<
PREPARED BY: +`
Phe.Lartl 6rery4lne-
O
a 7860 9
4e* ��
Jamcs 1L N'art8.lm R.
462 E..k 9hoi06ik. Sul.IUD,Er94.Hihotl os id6ri G.+at ih l.ndr'�...
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits
wcu�
n IN�IUEn WMF1 IDW 16
�L7�1116 PAIA(f GCA nFICi
HM W.RUU.U..I MW� f
Nwml;m
MIR S1£1611m,
..loll gj
cri;
6N1 W.HLgNMN Ind
UA&IHUMIU11
'Pit
6121611RA1
J6U92WS
ff
t
�IIItr]9Y6�{map
a AJIV aov
mHarkEnU 6<ak V-ZW 1t.Fdfk 1r
okd b--md,.I%XM
�THE Annexation r
IAMa Thruston Ghoi Farms Subdivision ca
— -SROUP City of Meridian r
City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits