Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ - Transportation Analysis ■ IDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE TIA TRANSPORTATION • PREPARED FOR AVILA EAGLE GROVE, LLC Sabrina Minshall Digitally Signedl2025.11.26 Scott M Mansur 16:47:36-08'00' PREPARED BY DKS ASSOCIATES \OA L T Scott Mansur, P.E., PTOE, RSP1 _,va Ben Fuller, P.E. Harrison Steiger, EIT i EXPIRES: MAY 31, 2026 1 704 E.UNITED HERITAGE COURT,SUITE 204 MERIDIAN, ID 83642 • 208.378.0654 • DKSASSOCIATES.COM SHAPING A SMARTER TRANSPORTATION EXPERIENCE' AN EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................4 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................5 STUDY AREA ROADWAY NETWORK................................................................................5 CRASH ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................6 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES......................................................................................7 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE MEASURES......................................................................7 EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATIONS .........................................................................8 PROJECT IMPACTS ...........................................................................................................9 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................... 9 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS .............................................................................................. 9 TRIP GENERATION ................................................................................................. 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................... 10 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES ...................................................................................... 10 FUTURE INTERSECTION OPERATIONS.......................................................................... 13 TURN LANE EVALUATIONS........................................................................................ 14 SEGMENT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 16 SITE PLAN EVALUATION ................................................................................................. 17 ACCESS SPACING .................................................................................................. 17 SIGHT DISTANCE................................................................................................... 17 CO N N E C TIV TY....................................................................................................... 17 PROJECT SUMMARY........................................................................................................ 17 I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Parkland Sod Farm is a new 210-unit residential subdivision, proposed in the southeast quadrant of S Eagle Road and E Vantage Pointe Lane in Meridian. The development will have access along E Vantage Pointe Lane and access along S Eagle Road. The S Eagle Road access will align with planned collector road to the west, referred to as the Main Access The following study scenarios were analyzed: • Existing (2025) conditions • Future No-Build (2028) - this scenario represents the estimated build-out year and includes nearby approved developments without the Parkland Sod Farm development • Future Build (2028) - this scenario includes the Parkland Sod Farm development The new development is expected to generate 1,997 trips per day. During the morning and evening peak hours there will be an expected 146 and 200 trips, respectively. Based on conversations with ACHD, the study area includes the following two intersections and one roadway segment: • Intersection 1: S Eagle Road and E Vantage Pointe Lane • Intersection 2: S Eagle Road and Main Access • Roadway Segment 1: S Eagle Road from E Vantage Pointe Lane to the Main Access The following is a summary of the conclusions of this traffic impact analysis report: • Both study intersections meet the ACHD operating standards during the AM and PM peak hours under all analysis scenarios. • The study segment meets the ACHD operating standards during the AM and PM peak hours under all analysis scenarios. • The left turn lane guidance is met for southbound traffic at both study intersections under the future 2028 Build PM scenario. Additionally, the southbound left turn lane is met during the 2028 No Build scenario (no project traffic) at the Eagle Road / E Vantage Pointe Lane intersection. • The right turn lane guidance is not met for northbound traffic at either study intersection under the future 2028 Build scenario in either the AM or PM peak hours. • The proposed access on S Eagle Road does not meet ACHD's current access spacing standard, the access would be in alignment with the planned Main Access roadway that would connect to S Eagle Road from the west and would therefore not further impact access spacing beyond what is already planned. The following is a summary of recommendations: • It is recommended that the proposed development be conditioned to provide southbound left turn lane at the S. Eagle Road and Main Access intersection. The minimum turn lane distance per the ACHD Policy Manual is 300 feet, and the taper length to be designed to accommodate a 50-mph facility. • Prior to occupancy, sight distance at any proposed access point or local street connection will need to be verified, documented, and stamped by a registered professional Civil or Traffic Engineer licensed in the State of Idaho to assure that buildings, fences, signs, or landscaping does not restrict sight distance. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 This study evaluates the transportation impacts associated with the proposed Parkland Sod Farm development—a residential subdivision of 210 single family homes in Ada County. The property is located on the southeast quadrant of the S Eagle Road/E Vantage Pointe Lane intersection, just south of the Meridian City limits. The property is currently used for sod farming by The Turf Company. The site is identified as a Rural Urban Transition zone within the Meridian's Area of City Impact (AOCI). The proposed development is subject to an Ada County application as it is outside the Meridian City Limits and is subject to City of Meridian review for compliance with their comprehensive plan and applicable City policies because it is within the City's AOCI. The site plan plans to have access on E Vantage Pointe Lane and access on S Eagle Road. The S Eagle Road access is planned to align with the planned roadway referred to as the Main Access, which is a planned collector that will extend to the west from S Eagle Road. The development is estimated to be completed in year 2028. The site plan can be found in Appendix A. The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to identify potential impacts that the proposed development may have on the nearby transportation network, and to recommend any relevant mitigation measures to offset impacts. The impact analysis is focused on the study intersections, which are listed below and shown in Figure 1. 1. S Eagle Road/E Vantage Pointe Lane 2. S Eagle Road/ Main Access (planned) The study area was determined in coordination with ACHD and COMPASS. The S Eagle Road/E Lake Hazel Road intersection was not included in the study area as the intersection is currently under construction to be widened and signalized as part of the Eagle Road, Lake Hazel Road to Amity Road improvement project. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 4 O STUDY INTERSECTION NO SCALE -- PROPOSED ROADS E ej�G<FyOR 7� O E VANTAGE POI/V,F , e N MAIN ACCESS �O f� 6� Sp C 6,' O E COLUMBIA RD FIGURE 1: STUDY AREA CONDITIONS I This section provides documentation of existing study area conditions, including the study area ■ roadway network, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and existing traffic volumes and operations. STUDY AREA ROADWAY NETWORK The following two study roadways are described below in Table 1. Note there is no fixed route transit service in the study area. MMMERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 5 TABLE 1: STUDY AREA ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS ROADWAY JURISDICTION FUNCTIONAL LANES POSTED SIDEWALK BICYCLE CLASSIFICTAION SPEED FACILITIES S EAGLE RD ACHD Principal Arterial 2 50 No No EVANTAGE POINTE LN Private* Private 2 None No No * It is our understanding that E Vantage Pointe Lane will be converted to a public street and will be consistent with a typical local street classification. CRASH ANALYSIS Crash data was obtained for the five most recent years of available data (1/1/2020 - 12/31/2024) for the study area. There were two crashes in the study area during this five-year period. One intersection crash occurred at the S Eagle Road/E Vantage Pointe Lane intersection. A northbound driver turning right on E Vantage Pointe Lane lost control and struck a tree. This crash was classified as property damage only, fixed-object crash and occurred on a clear, dry day. One roadway segment crash occurred near the development on S Eagle Road between E Bingley Drive and E Columbia Road. The crash occurred approximately 700 feet south of E Vantage Pointe Lane. A southbound driver drifted off the road, overcorrected, and overturned, which resulted in an Injury C crash. Table 2 provides a summary of the crash history in the study area. TABLE 2: CRASH SEVERITY BY LOCATION (2020 — 2024) CRASHES BY SEVERITY CRASHES CRASH LOCATION PROPERTY PER RATES INJURY INJURY INJURY YEAR FATAL A B C DAMAGE TOTAL ONLY INTERSECTION S EAGLE RD/ E VANTAGE 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.2 0.11 POINTELN SEGMENT S EAGLE RD — E BINGLEY DR TO 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.2 0.11 E COLUMBIA RD a Rate Calculation = Crashes/(Average Daily Traffic x 365 days x Number of Years/1 million)— [units: crashes per million entering vehicles] EnMERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES The Eagle Road, Lake Hazel Road to Amity Road project that is currently under construction is likely to impact existing traffic in the study due to full or partial road closures and detour routing. Any traffic counts collected during construction would underrepresent traffic volumes. Therefore, this study did not collect new traffic counts but relies on recent historical traffic volume data. To develop existing 2025 traffic counts, vehicle data from the 2023 Reveille Ridge Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was used. The Reveille Ridge TIS collected turning movement counts on S Eagle Road in November 2021 and applied an annual growth rate of 10% to achieve 2023 volumes on S Eagle Road. For this report, the 2023 volumes on S Eagle Road were grown at the 10% annual rate for 2 years to estimate northbound and southbound traffic volumes for the S Eagle Road/E Vantage Pointe Lane intersection. To determine the turning volumes to and from E Vantage Pointe Lane, ITE 11tn Edition trip generation data was used. These estimated turning movement volumes were also field verified. The resulting 2025 existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE MEASURES Agency mobility standards often require intersections to meet level of service (LOS) or volume-to- capacity (v/c) intersection operation thresholds. • Level of Service (LOS): A "report card" rating (A through F) based on the average delay experienced by vehicles at the intersection. LOS A, B, and C indicate conditions where traffic moves without significant delays over periods of peak hour travel demand. LOS D and E are progressively worse operating conditions. LOS F represents conditions where average delay has become excessive, and demand has exceeded capacity. • Volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio: A decimal representation (typically between 0.00 and 1.0) of the proportion of capacity that is being used at a turn movement, approach leg, or intersection. It is determined by dividing the peak hour traffic volume by the hourly capacity of a given intersection or movement. As the ratio approaches 1.00, congestion increases, and performance is reduced. If the ratio is greater than 1.00, the turn movement, approach leg, or intersection is oversaturated and usually results in excessive queues and long delays. Both study intersections are under Ada County Highway District (ACHD) jurisdiction. ACHD standards state that all arterials shall operate at LOS E or better.' 1 ACHD Livable Streets Performance Measures, Pg 6, December 2024. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 7 O 2025 EXISTING AM (PM)PEAK VOLUMES N O STUDY INTERSECTION NO SCALE -- PROPOSED ROADS S EAGLE RD/ LANE CONFIGURATION E VANTAGE POINTE LN ## MOTOR VEHICLE PEAK HOUR JG) TRAFFIC VOLUMES MEE LEFT•THRU•RIGHT O M 9(6) VOLUME TURN MOVEMENT ®m 40 0(0) Q m 1(1) MEE (0)0 m o M E VANTAGE POI/V,, �N MAIN ACCESS S EAGLE RD/ MAIN ACCESS _ 'co O M O ®0(0) o m o 4 11110(0) 1�0„ ®t Q m 0(0) ------- +--- ---------- (0)0 M (0)0®4* mom o o_ o (0)0® o 0 c E COLUMBIA RD FIGURE 2: EXISTING (2025) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Existing traffic operations at the study intersections were determined for the AM and PM peak hours based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 71h Edition methodology for unsignalized intersections.2 The results were then compared with ACHD's operating standards. Table 3 lists the estimated v/c ratio, delay, and LOS at each study intersection. z Highway Capacity Manual, 71h Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 8 As shown below, both study intersections meet ACHD's operating standards during the AM and PM peak hours under existing conditions. TABLE 3: EXISTING INTERSECTION OPERATIONS (2025) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATING STANDARD V/C DELAY V/C � DELAY)RATIO (S/VEH) LOS RATIO (S/VEH LOS EXISTING S EAGLE RD/ E VANTAGE LOS E 0.01 11.8 A/B 0.01 9.5 A/A POINTELN MINOR-STREET STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION: Delay=Critical Movement Approach Delay(seconds/vehicle) v/c=Associated Movement Volume-to-Capacity Ratio LOS=Level of Service(Major Street Left Turn/Minor Street Approach) PROJECT IMPACTS I This section reviews the impacts that the proposed residential development may have on the transportation system within the study area. This analysis includes trip generation, trip distribution, future year traffic volumes, operating conditions for study intersections and roadway segments, and turn lane warrants. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development is a 210-lot subdivision to be used for single-family residential living. The site will provide access to E Vantage Pointe Lane and to S Eagle Road. The project completion is estimated to be 2028. ANALYSIS SCENARIOS Future operating conditions were analyzed at the study intersections for the following future traffic scenarios. The comparison of the following scenarios enables the assessment of project impacts. 2028 No-Build: This scenario represents the expected future traffic conditions of the study area without the project trips from the proposed development. In addition to the existing volumes, this scenario includes a background growth rate and trips produced by nearby developments that have been approved and are expected to be complete prior to year 2028. 2028 Build: This scenario represents the expected traffic conditions of the study area including the project trips from the proposed development, assuming it is built and fully occupied in 2028. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 9 TRIP GENERATION Single-Family Detached Housing (code 210) from the ITE 111" Edition Trip Generation Manual was used to determine the trip generation of the project site.3 Neither Internal nor Pass-By trip reductions were applied to the values as they do not apply for this land use. Table shows the trip generation for the proposed development. As shown, the development is expected to generate a total of 146 AM peak hour trips and 200 PM peak hour trips. TABLE 4: TRIP GENERATION LAND USE AM PEAK TRIPS PM PEAK TRIPS DAILY SIZE TRIPS (ITE CODE) TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED Units n 146 37 109 200 126 74 1,997 HOUSING (210) it TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 3 shows the expected trip distribution and project trip routing for the trips generated by the proposed development. The distribution was determined from the COMPASS model provided and is shown in Appendix H. • 90% total trips to/from the north on S Eagle Road • 10% total trips to/from the south on S Eagle Road FUTURE YEAR (2028) TRAFFIC VOLUMES The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the two future analysis scenarios are shown in Figure 4 and Figure S. The Future 2028 No-Build scenario volumes were estimated by applying a linear growth rate of 10% per year to the existing northbound and southbound through volumes to 2028 (assumed year of project completion). Additionally, the estimated project trips from the nearby Reveille Ridge and Sunrise Rim developments were added to the study intersections. The Future 2028 Build scenario volumes were estimated by adding the project trips to the Future 2028 No-Build scenario volumes. Based on the existing and future traffic volumes (including the Skybreak subdivision) estimated on E Vantage Pointe Lane, we project that the future average daily traffic to be approximately 1,200. It is our understanding that this street will become public and the appropriate classification would be a local street. 3 Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 10 N O STUDY INTERSECTION NO SCALE -- PROPOSED ROADS 90% � S EAGLE RD/ 4— LANE CONFIGURATION E VANTAGE POINTE LN ## MOTOR VEHICLE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES in m®m LEFT•THRU•RIGHT o m 16 11 VOLUME TURN MOVEMENT ( ) m®m 4®0(0) o m 5(3) (o)om s� N E VANTAGE POI/v,�, F� N MAIN ACCESS S EAGLE RD/ MAIN ACCESS n rn 'c4� o m m 82(56) m®m 41mo(o) o��o lt Q m 6(4) ---------- ---------- (0)0 m© m 10% (0)O®� O N N (0)0 m o 0 0 E COLUMBIA RD FIGURE 3: TRIP GENERATION & TRIP DISTRIBUTION MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 11 O 2028 NO BUILD AM (PM)PEAK VOLUMES O STUDY INTERSECTION NO SCALE -- PROPOSED ROADS S EAGLE RD/ 4-- LANE CONFIGURATION E VANTAGE POINTE LN ## MOTOR VEHICLE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES m > o a v m®m LEFT•THRU•RIGHT m o m 40(26) VOLUME TURN MOVEMENT m®m 41m0(0) 'r 0 m 7(5) aR (o, 1 4;® ► mmm (o)o m o �a E VANTAGE POI/( F� N MAIN ACCESS PROJECT SITE S EAGLE RD/ MAIN ACCESS 0 n � N �2 O ®0(0) m®m 4m0(0) t Q m 0(0) -- -- ---------- (49)68 m© 4t+ (0)0®+, m®m (4)6 mit E COLUMBIA RD FIGURE 4: FUTURE NO-BUILD (2028) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 12 O 2028 BUILD AM (PM) PEAK VOLUMES N O STUDY INTERSECTION NO SCALE -- PROPOSED ROADS S EAGLE RD/ LANE CONFIGURATION E VANTAGE POINTE LN ## MOTOR VEHICLE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES m D G7 � �M M[Mal LEFT•THRU•RIGHT m =N m 56(37) VOLUME TURN MOVEMENT m®m 4111110(0) Q*m 12(8) E ejNG<Fy (0)1 m fF► pR (0)0®� m®m ��.. (0)0 m o T v N E VANTAGE POI/V', F�N MAIN ACCESS S EAGLE RD/ MAIN ACCESS M 2 m 82(56) N N 00(0) q�lO I� © II'Si 6(4) q� ---------- (49)68 m© 't (0)0®+' m®m N 6 N (4)6 m �m E COLUMBIA RD F FIGURE 5: FUTURE BUILD (2028) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FUTURE YEAR (2028) INTERSECTION OPERATIONS Future year 2028 traffic operations at the study intersections were determined for the AM and PM peak hour based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition methodology for unsignalized intersections. Table 5 lists the estimated v/c ratio, delay, and LOS at each study intersection for the AM and PM peak hours for the No-Build and Build scenarios, respectively. The reports are provided in Appendix C, D and E. As shown, both study intersections meet ACHD's operating standards during the AM and PM peak hours under both future scenarios. As both intersections would operate LOS C or better, signal warrant analysis is not applicable. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 1 , TABLE 5: FUTURE NO-BUILD & BUILD INTERSECTION OPERATIONS (2028) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATING STANDARD V/C DELAY V/C DELAY RATIO (S/VEH) LOS RATIO (DELAY) LOS 2028 NO BUILD S EAGLE RD/ E VANTAGE LOS E 0.01 16.5 A/C 0.05 11.0 A/B POINTELN S EAGLE RD/ LOS E 0.18 15.5 A/C 0.14 15.6 A/C MAIN ACCESS 2028 BUILD S EAGLE RD/ E VANTAGE LOS E 0.01 19.7 A/C 0.09 12.8 A/B POINTE LN S EAGLE RD/ LOS E 0.24 19.8 A/C 0.23 24.1 A/C MAIN ACCESS SIDE-STREET STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTION: Delay=Critical Movement Approach Delay(seconds/vehicle) v/c=Associated Movement Volume-to-Capacity Ratio LOS=Level of Service(Major/Minor Road) TURN LANE EVALUATIONS The ACHD Policy Manual4 provides guidance for when dedicated left turn and right turn lanes may be required. Table 6 and Table 7 provide a summary of the left turn and right turn lane analysis, respectively. Appendix G provides the turn lane guidance charts. This analysis is based on the posted speed of 50 mph. As shown in Table 6, the left turn lane guidance is met in the PM peak hour (not in AM peak hour) at both study intersections. It should be noted, the southbound left turn lane is met during the 2028 No Build scenario at the Eagle Road / E Vantage Pointe Lane intersection. As shown in Table 7, the right turn lane guidance is not met in either peak hour at either study intersection (also note that the guidance is not applicable where right turn volume is less than 10 vehicles per hour; therefore the guidance would only apply for the PM peak hour for the northbound right turn at S Eagle Road/E Vantage Pointe Lane). The Idaho Supplementary Guidance to the MUTCD gives guidance on left-turn lane pavement markings5. The required storage length for uncontrolled left-turn lanes is based on the turning volumes and the opposing volumes. Based on the 2028 Build Scenario volumes, the minimum 4 ACHD Policy Manual, Section 7106.4.4 5 Traffic Manual: Idaho Supplementary Guidance to the MUTCD - Figure 313-2 I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 required storage length at both study intersections is 50 feet, which exceeds the estimated 95th percentile queues (described in the subsequent section). Additionally, the required deceleration for a 50-mph road (Eagle Rd) is 265 feet. Therefore, a 315-foot left turn lane would meet these design criteria and would satisfy the ACHD minimum of 300 feet for a left turn lane. A concept of the proposed southbound left-turn lanes is shown in Appendix G. TABLE 6: LEFT TURN LANE EVALUATION (2028 NO BUILD AND BUILD SCENARIOS) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT ADV. ADV. VOLUME OPPOSING MEET VOLUME OPPOSING MEET (% LEFT) VOLUME WARRANT? LEFT) VOLUME WARRANT? EAGLE RD / E VANTAGE POINTE LN 2028 No Build Southbound Left 198 (7%) 485 NO 514 (9%) 206 YES 2028 Build Southbound Left 231 (8%) 569 NO 629 (10%) 268 YES EAGLE RD / MAIN ACCESS 2028 Build Southbound Left 224 (13%) 421 NO 573 (17%) 169 YES TABLE 7: RIGHT TURN LANE ANALYSIS (2028 BUILD SCENARIO) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR MOVEMENT ADVANCING RIGHT MEET ADVANCING RIGHT MEET VOLUME TURNS WARRANT? VOLUME TURNS WARRANT? EAGLE RD / E VANTAGE POINTE LN Northbound Right 569 6 NO 268 14 NO EAGLE RD / MAIN ACCESS Northbound Right 423 2 NO 175 6 NO I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 15 QUEUING ANALYSIS Vehicle queuing analysis was performed for the 2028 PM Peak hour under No Build and Build scenarios to determine the 951h percentile queues. Because left turn lane warrants are met, the Build scenario was analyzed with dedicated southbound left turn lanes at both study intersections. The 951h percentile queue is the queue length for a given intersection movement that has only a five percent chance of being exceeded during the peak traffic hour. The queue lengths were estimated using SimTraffic. As shown in the table below, the 951h percentile queues at the intersection do not the minimum 50 foot storage requirement. Therefore, it would be appropriate to design for 50 feet of storage in addition to the deceleration distance of 265 feet. TABLE 8: 2028 QUEUING ANALYSIS MINIMUM 95TH PERCENTILE QUEUE EXCEEDS MOVEMENT STORAGE MINIMUM QUEUE LENGTH STORAGE? 2028 NO BUILD PM Eagle Rd/ Vantage Pointe Ln Southbound Left/Through/Right N/A 40 feet N/A 2028 BUILD PM - WITH SB LEFT TURN LANES Eagle Rd/ Vantage Pointe Ln Southbound Left 50 feet 40 feet NO Eagle Rd/ Main Access Southbound Left 50 feet 40 feet NO SEGMENT ANALYSIS The ACHD Policy Manual provides Level of Service (LOS) thresholds for roadway segments. For single-lane Principal Arterials the LOS standards is LOS E or better. For this single-lane facility without turn lanes, the LOS thresholds are 600 vehicles per hour for LOS D and 690 vehicles per hour for LOS E. As shown in Table 9, the study segment meets ACHD's LOS standard as all peak hour volumes are within the 690 vehicle per hour threshold. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 16 TABLE 9: SEGMENT ANALYSIS SEGMENT FUNCTIONAL CLASS LANES DIRECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME LOS Principal Arterial 1 NB AM 620 E S EAGLE RD - Principal Arterial 1 SB AM 231 < D E VANTAGE POINTE LN TO E BINGLEY DR Principal Arterial 1 NB PM 291 < D Principal Arterial 1 SB PM 629 E ,SITE PLAN EVALUATION I ACCESS SPACING ACHD's minimum spacing standard is 1,320 feet on principal arterials. The proposed access on S Eagle Road is approximately 490 feet from E Vantage Pointe Lane. However, the proposed access on S Eagle Road would align with the planned Main Access. Therefore, the proposed access would not further impact access spacing beyond what is already planned. SIGHT DISTANCE Adequate sight distance should be provided at the proposed alleys and internal public local streets. Objects (e.g., buildings, fences, walls, or vegetation) located near the intersections may inhibit sight distance for drivers attempting to turn out of a minor street onto the major street. Preliminary sight distance was evaluated at the proposed Main Access to S. Eagle Road and no concerns were identified. Prior to occupancy, sight distance at any proposed access point or local street connection will need to be verified, documented, and stamped by a registered professional Civil or Traffic Engineer licensed in the State of Idaho to assure that buildings, fences, signs, or landscaping does not restrict sight distance. CONNECTIVITY The proposed site plan provides adequate pedestrian and vehicle connectivity. There are proposed roadway connections to the north and south, along with dedicated sidewalk that accesses S Eagle Road. The site plan also shows pedestrian connections to the Farr Lateral pathway that runs along the east side of the proposed property. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 17 �CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed 210 single-family housing subdivision development just south of Meridian would generate 146 AM peak hour trips, 200 PM peak hour trips, and 1,997 daily trips. The estimated year of completion is 2028. The following is a summary of the conclusions of this traffic impact analysis report: • Both study intersections (S Eagle Road/E Vantage Pointe Lane and S Eagle Road/Main Access) meet the ACHD operating standards during the AM and PM peak hours under all analysis scenarios. • The study segment of S Eagle Road from E Bingley Drive to E Vantage Pointe Lane meets the ACHD operating standards during the AM and PM peak hours under all analysis scenarios. • The left turn lane guidance is met for southbound traffic at both study intersections under the future 2028 Build PM scenario. Additionally, the southbound left turn lane is met during the 2028 No Build scenario (no project traffic) at the Eagle Road / E Vantage Pointe Lane intersection. • The right turn lane guidance is not met for northbound traffic at either study intersection under the future 2028 Build scenario in either the AM or PM peak hours. • The proposed access on S Eagle Road does not meet ACHD's current access spacing standard, the access would be in alignment with the planned Main Access roadway that would connect to S Eagle Road from the west and would therefore not further impact access spacing beyond what is already planned. The following is a summary of recommendations: • It is recommended that the proposed development be conditioned to provide southbound left turn lane at the S Eagle Road and Main Access intersection. The minimum turn lane distance per the ACHD Policy Manual is 300 feet, and the taper length to be designed to accommodate a 50 mph facility. • Prior to occupancy, sight distance at any proposed access point or local street connection will need to be verified, documented, and stamped by a registered professional Civil or Traffic Engineer licensed in the State of Idaho to assure that buildings, fences, signs, or landscaping does not restrict sight distance. I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • NOVEMBER 2025 18 APPENDIX CONTENTS APPENDIX A: SITE PLAN APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNTS APPENDIX C: EXISTING HCM REPORTS APPENDIX D: NO-BUILD HCM REPORTS APPENDIX E: BUILD HCM REPORTS APPENDIX F: CRASH DATA APPENDIX G: TURN LANE WARRANTS APPENDIX H: COMPASS MODEL PLOTS I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS OCTOBER 2025 APPENDIX A: SITE PLAN I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 7 5 7 7 �., _ Site Summary: 78 Secondary Entry �z •* p�A LOCK-K 10 Rti- . Total Homes �40'x 105 Lots 86 (41 .0/) 7. 50 x l 05 Lots 71 (33.8%) - - - - - E a s t V a-n--t a g e P -o� t L ten- e - \ 77'x 105' Lots 53 (25.2%) Total : 210 a I \ Gross Site Area : ± 60.4 Acres \ Gross Density : ± 3.48 Homes per Acre 61 6 0 ' 5 9 ' 58 57 ' 56 ' 55 ' 54 ' 53 ' 52 ' 5 I ' 50 ' 49 ; \ r y P { 62 I 48 ,/ \ L----- \ / 47 / Net Site Area : ± 48.4 Acres 1 I — — L '� \ \ \ Net Density • ± 4.34 Homes per Acre 1 I 63 - - --- , 46 \ ----------- Tcm - 64 v E . 85 84 80 79 67 v - -- -- -- 66 v 65 81 78 -- -- -- 51 86 83 - -- --_ 68 / - �. , 65 _\ v v \ 10 Community Trail w/ Fitness Stations 82 1 7766 69 64 50 v Primary Entry 45 70 63 \� 49 \ 67 68 69 70 71 1 71 62 44 \ \ \ 48 �, \ _- __ -_ - \ ,, \ 61 Recreation Area 72 ,/ \ 60 Farr Lateral Easement . ; .f 43 \ \ \ \ I40 1 .8 Acres 60 52 47 73 ------- 42 � Open Space ,,— - 74 59 ---------- __� \ \ 46 \ \ ±3.0 Acres CZ 41 \ / o 75 58 \ _ 5 4 3 2 1 --- -- -- -_ -_ -- -- -- -- / \ 5345 76 57 40 — � — co Z - 44LU 20 21 36 37 56 41 17 39 \ U -- - _ -- -- -- -- --- -- - 1 / � � v \ 10 Community Trail Connection 0 42 19 22 35 55 40 \ �, A to Existing Neighborhood V) 8 38 1 , 18 23 34 39 54 1 O en Space 9 \ 3 7 39 23 \ 1 , , , , 24 33 40 53 210 22 1 16 25 32 41 52 36 v -T- / � y4000 1 —1 \ \ � \ y 21 6 15 Z6 31 42 51 , y I I I I 20 1 1 I 34 35 36 37 38 7 14 27 30 43 50 25 /12 / _1 8 13 28 29 44 49 �__ __ _ __ __ __ __ -- -- -_ -- --� ,/ \ \ 1926 , \ � I13 -_ __ __ -- __ 33 1 4 � \ 9 12 48 - pen _ __ __ __ __� 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 v . 14 I 32 18 , 1 10 II Space 46 47 5 - - I5 \ \ 31 � � � — \ 17-1 F F y 16 17//// 18 19 20 2 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 �, ,� 6 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 -. v1 I v 16 v1Z - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - -- � - - - - � - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • k ! North \ - - R-8 R-4 \ v v Paseo - v v v Paseo v v Future Pedestrian Connection to South Future Connection to South Future Connection to South Original Sale I - 6 Bassenian I Lagoni CONCEPTUAL SITE P L A N ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING - INTERIORS Copyright 2025 Bassenian I Lagoni Architects P A R K L A N D S O D F A R M 07 . 23 . 25 2031 Orchard Drive, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho Note: Newport Beach, CA USA 92660 tel. +1 949 553 9100 This yield study is for the purpose of estimating the maximum density of a residential fax+1 949 553 0548 0 30 60 120 product type on a site of a given configuration. If specific entitlement requirements differ Avila Eagle Grove, L LC A1 4 . 2 5 1 4 3 from the criteria shown on the plan (such as setbacks, minimum lot sizes, street standards, SCALE: I" — 60`-0" retention requirements, etc.) then the actual possible density may vary substantially. APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNTS I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 APPENDIX C: EXISTING HCM REPORTS I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 HCM 7th TWSC Exisitng 2025 -AM 1: E Vantage Point Ln & Eagle Rd Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 1 0 9 0 308 2 3 95 0 Future Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 1 0 9 0 308 2 3 95 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 1 0 9 0 321 2 3 99 0 Major/Minor IVIIIIUIL W Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 426 428 99 427 427 322 99 0 0 323 0 0 Stage 1 105 105 - 322 322 - - - - - - - Stage 2 321 323 - 105 105 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 542 522 962 541 523 724 1507 - 1248 - Stage 1 905 812 - 694 655 - - - Stage 2 695 654 - 905 812 - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 534 521 962 540 521 724 1507 - 1248 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 534 521 - 540 521 - - - Stage 1 903 810 - 694 655 - Stage 2 686 654 - 903 810 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 11.76 10.22 0 0.24 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1507 534 700 55 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.002 0.015 0.003 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 0 - 11.8 10.2 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS A B B A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0 0 - DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report HCM 7th TWSC Exisitng 2025 - PM 1: E Vantage Point Ln & Eagle Rd Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 113 1 9 372 1 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 113 1 9 372 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 120 1 10 396 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 536 537 396 536 537 121 397 0 0 121 0 0 Stage 1 415 415 - 121 121 - - - - - - - Stage 2 120 121 - 415 416 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 459 453 657 459 453 936 1173 - 1479 - Stage 1 618 596 - 888 800 - - - - Stage 2 889 799 - 619 595 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 452 450 657 455 450 936 1173 - 1479 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 452 450 - 455 450 - - - - Stage 1 613 591 - 888 800 - - Stage 2 883 799 - 614 590 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 0 9.47 0 0.18 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1173 - 813 42 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.009 0.006 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 0 0 9.5 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0 DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report APPENDIX D: NO-BUILD HCM REPORTS I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 No Build -AM 1: E Vantage Point Ln & Eagle Rd Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 7 0 40 0 481 4 14 184 0 Future Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 7 0 40 0 481 4 14 184 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 7 0 42 0 501 4 15 192 0 Major/Minor MInor2Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 722 726 192 724 724 503 192 0 0 505 0 0 Stage 1 221 221 - 503 503 - - - - - - - Stage 2 501 505 - 221 221 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 345 353 855 344 354 573 1394 - 1070 - Stage 1 786 724 - 554 545 - - - Stage 2 556 544 - 786 724 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 315 348 855 338 349 573 1394 - 1070 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 315 348 - 338 349 - - - Stage 1 774 713 - 554 545 - - - Stage 2 515 544 - 774 713 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 16.48 12.66 0 0.59 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1394 315 519 127 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.003 0.094 0.014 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 0 - 16.5 12.7 8.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A C B A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0.3 0 DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 No Build -AM 2: Eagle Rd & New Vantage Point Ln Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 68 0 6 0 0 0 2 417 0 0 164 27 Future Vol,veh/h 68 0 6 0 0 0 2 417 0 0 164 27 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 71 0 6 0 0 0 2 434 0 0 171 28 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 623 623 185 609 638 434 199 0 0 434 0 0 Stage 1 185 185 - 439 439 - - - - - - - Stage 2 439 439 - 171 199 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 401 405 863 410 397 626 1386 - 1136 - Stage 1 822 751 - 601 582 - - - Stage 2 601 582 - 836 740 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 400 404 863 406 397 626 1386 - 1136 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 400 404 - 406 397 - - - Stage 1 822 751 - 600 581 Stage 2 600 581 - 830 740 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 15.54 0 0.04 0 HCM LOS C A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 9 418 1136 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.184 - HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 7.6 0 15.5 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A A C A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.7 - 0 DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 No Build - PM 1: E Vantage Point Ln & Eagle Rd Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 5 0 26 0 198 8 44 470 1 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 5 0 26 0 198 8 44 470 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 5 0 28 0 211 9 47 500 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 805 813 501 809 810 215 501 0 0 219 0 0 Stage 1 594 594 - 215 215 - - - - - - - Stage 2 211 219 - 594 595 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 303 315 574 302 316 830 1074 - 1362 - Stage 1 495 496 - 792 729 - - - Stage 2 796 726 - 495 496 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 279 300 574 287 301 830 1074 - 1362 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 279 300 - 287 301 - - - Stage 1 471 472 - 792 729 - Stage 2 770 726 - 472 472 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 0 10.97 0 0.66 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1074 - 636 154 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.052 0.034 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 0 0 11 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 0.1 DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 No Build - PM 2: Eagle Rd & New Vantage Point Ln Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 49 0 4 0 0 0 6 157 0 0 400 75 Future Vol,veh/h 49 0 4 0 0 0 6 157 0 0 400 75 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 52 0 4 0 0 0 6 167 0 0 426 80 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 645 645 465 605 685 167 505 0 0 167 0 0 Stage 1 465 465 - 180 180 - - - - - - - Stage 2 180 180 - 426 505 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 388 393 601 412 373 882 1070 - 1423 - Stage 1 581 566 - 827 754 - - - Stage 2 827 754 - 611 543 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 385 391 601 407 371 882 1070 - 1423 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 385 391 - 407 371 - - - Stage 1 581 566 - 821 749 - - - Stage 2 821 749 - 606 543 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 15.59 0 0.31 0 HCM LOS C A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 66 396 1423 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.142 - HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 8.4 0 15.6 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A A C A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.5 - 0 DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report APPENDIX E: BUILD HCM REPORTS I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 Build -AM 1: E Vantage Point Ln & Eagle Rd Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 12 0 56 0 563 6 19 212 0 Future Vol,veh/h 1 0 0 12 0 56 0 563 6 19 212 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 1 0 0 13 0 58 0 586 6 20 221 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 847 853 221 850 850 590 221 0 0 593 0 0 Stage 1 260 260 - 590 590 - - - - - - - Stage 2 586 593 - 260 260 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 284 299 824 283 300 512 1360 - 993 - Stage 1 749 696 - 498 498 - - - Stage 2 500 497 - 749 696 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 246 292 824 276 293 512 1360 - 993 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 246 292 - 276 293 - - - Stage 1 732 680 - 498 498 - - - Stage 2 443 497 - 732 680 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 19.7 14.62 0 0.72 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1360 246 445 148 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.004 0.159 0.02 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 0 - 19.7 14.6 8.7 0 HCM Lane LOS A C B A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0.6 0.1 - DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 Build -AM 2: Eagle Rd & New Vantage Point Ln Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 68 0 6 6 0 82 2 419 2 28 169 27 Future Vol,veh/h 68 0 6 6 0 82 2 419 2 28 169 27 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 71 0 6 6 0 85 2 436 2 29 176 28 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 689 691 190 676 704 438 204 0 0 439 0 0 Stage 1 248 248 - 442 442 - - - - - - - Stage 2 441 443 - 234 263 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 363 370 857 370 364 623 1379 - 1132 - Stage 1 760 705 - 599 580 - - - Stage 2 599 579 - 773 695 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 303 359 857 356 353 623 1379 - 1132 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 303 359 - 356 353 - - - Stage 1 738 684 - 597 579 - Stage 2 516 578 - 745 675 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 19.79 12.18 0.04 1.03 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 9 320 593 219 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 0.241 0.155 0.026 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 7.6 0 19.8 12.2 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS A A C B A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.9 0.5 0.1 - DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 Build - PM 1: E Vantage Point Ln & Eagle Rd Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 8 0 37 0 254 14 63 565 1 Future Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 8 0 37 0 254 14 63 565 1 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 0 39 0 270 15 67 601 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1006 1021 602 1013 1014 278 602 0 0 285 0 0 Stage 1 736 736 - 278 278 - - - - - - - Stage 2 270 285 - 735 736 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 222 238 504 219 241 766 985 - 1289 - Stage 1 414 428 - 733 684 - - - Stage 2 740 679 - 414 428 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 194 220 504 202 222 766 985 - 1289 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 194 220 - 202 222 - - - Stage 1 382 395 - 733 684 - - - Stage 2 702 679 - 382 394 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 0 12.75 0 0.8 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 985 - 512 180 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.093 0.052 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 0 0 12.8 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS A A B A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 0.2 DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report HCM 7th TWSC Future 2028 Build - PM 2: Eagle Rd & New Vantage Point Ln Meridian Avila Eagle Grove TIA Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 49 0 4 4 0 56 6 163 6 95 403 75 Future Vol,veh/h 49 0 4 4 0 56 6 163 6 95 403 75 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 52 0 4 4 0 60 6 173 6 101 429 80 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 857 863 469 820 900 177 509 0 0 180 0 0 Stage 1 671 671 - 189 189 - - - - - - - Stage 2 186 193 - 631 711 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 2.2 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 280 294 599 296 280 872 1067 - 1408 - Stage 1 449 458 - 817 747 - - - Stage 2 820 745 - 472 440 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 233 263 599 262 250 872 1067 - 1408 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 233 263 - 262 250 - - - Stage 1 404 412 - 812 742 - - - Stage 2 759 740 - 422 395 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Ctrl Dly,s/v 24.14 10.21 0.29 1.29 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 61 244 755 289 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 0.231 0.085 0.072 HCM Ctrl Dly(s/v) 8.4 0 24.1 10.2 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS A A C B A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.9 0.3 0.2 - DKS Associates Synchro 12 Report APPENDIX F: CRASH DATA I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 Serial Num # Units intersection type intersectior_related 24C668038 1 T-Intersection true Local HwyJuris Year road type streets Ada County HD 2024 2-Way & 2 Double Yellow Painted Divider Eagle Rd County Date functional [lass sDVW Ada 2024-06_23 Minor Arterial null Hwy System Time speedlimilLstreetl reference street local 16:04 50 Vantage Pointe Ln Severity day_of week speedlimit streets dfst from_intersection Property Dmg Report Sunday null 25.23 ft N state of drivers_license directlor_of travel workzone_related Idaho N false latitude drhm action workzone_crash_location Turning Right 43.539165197387 null vision obstructfon worlongitude None null a—type -116.354304219267 null impaired workzone_ rjty False workem_present null false null itd_dist true geometries horizontal 3 first_hamtful-event Straight Tree geometrics legislative_dist vertical most_harmful_went Level 22 Other Fixed Object crash_mv_id events age 17 117778 Loss of Control,Ran Off Road,0 the r Fixed 0bjecrjree, contrib circ 1 -- Fore(oleFof I m p ro pe r Tu rn i contrib circ 2 „9, None contrib_circ 3 _. East Vantage Pointe Lane Non JT road surface Paved (Asphalt) road_su rface_cond ition Dry other road_conditlons None weather_colnditionl Clear weather condition2 null light condition Day trafnc_co ntrol_deWr,e Stop Sign on Cross Street Only traffic control function --------------- I •-------------•- Functioning Serial Num dirt frorn_intersmion events 21 C574932 698 Ft S Ran OI'f Road,Came Back on Road,Loss of Control,0verturn,Ran Off Road, Local Hwy Juris intersection type contrih_circ i Ada County HD Not at intersection Failed to Maintain Lane County road_type contrlh ciro Ada 2-Way&No Divider Overcorrected Hwy System functional [lass contrlb cln; 3 local Minor Arterial None Severity speed limit_streetl road surface C Injury Accident 50 Paved(Asphalt) #units road surface condltlon 1 speed li m i�street2 null Dry Year other road_conditlons 2621 direction_of travel Date S None 2a21-06-01 driver C actlon eather_conditioM Time Going Straight Clear 11:54 visi on_ohstruction weather_cond ltion2 day-0 week N one null Tuesday impaired light condition intersection-related false Day false lane_dep traffic_control_de+ice streets false None Eagle Rd first harmful-event traffic-control-functionstreet2 Overturn null null workzone_related reference street ��harmful event false Vantage Pointe Ln Overturn workzone_crash_location null i� • ��� ca workzone_type ;ry 3373 ;;i null workzone workers_present null 7191 . geometries horizontal Scraighc - E�S�V�r�ia�ePoirneLane geometrics_vertical Level i age -- 15 state of drivers_license Idaho N laUtude 43.5371 82323976 longitude n -116.354300612134 it null itd disc 3 legislative_d Ist 22 ------ - - - - - - - - - - crashmvid 32433 APPENDIX G: TURN LANE WARRANTS I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 S Eagle Road/ E Vantage Pointe Lane :^y IE'1-:JrrS 'L 7 _ Left Turn Lane -7 arran e 2028 Build AM(SBL) 8%lefts in VA 0 Z a O S v 2028 Build PM(SBL) 10%lefts in VA O Left-Tun Lane Not 0 Wa ranted z=] :7 7 z ec ?or: _o_ e._e x Advancing Volume(V�),veh,h S Eagle Road/ New Vantage Pointe Lane 40% 20% 15 10% v 3�0 Left Turn Lane _] \\ Warranted r 2028 Build AM(SBL) 13%lefts in VA 0 \IN u 0 a a O Left-Tui n Lane Not Wa ranted 2028 Build PM(SBL) 17%lefts in VA •.a ] ::c 4c': Adv:rrci'i7 Volume iV,yl.veh,h S Eagle Road/ E Vantage Pointe Lane Figure 6—Right-Turn Lane Guidelines for Two-Lane Roadways Aajor-Roa<I speed < 40 mph 160 kmth) 4.,1' Add Right-Tur Lane r > 50 m r (80 k 'h, P a 5s mp i90 km! r 2028 Build _ PM(NBRI 2028 Build AM(NBR) •ED mph ,'DO m'hr 300 :: - t10C 2C: dOC Major-Road Volume(one direction).vWh S Eagle Road/ New Vantage Pointe Lane Figure 6—Right-Turn Lane Guidelines for Two-Lane Roadways jor-Roadspeed < 40 mph 160 kmth; 45 1,. _`hn'I- Add Right-Tun w Lang o - se�Ir c0 o'h a �5 mpr 4: 90 kn-+ ' 2028 Build PM(NBR) CAM Build f 100 m NBR) _C: 300 4C0 60C 700 2C. 20C 1CCC Major-Road Volume(one direction).vetA .IIL � # R 44 4 L I I - 4 APPENDIX H : COMPASS MODEL PLOTS I® MERIDIAN AVILA EAGLE GROVE • TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS • OCTOBER 2025 Parkland Proposed Development The following summarizes the results of an area of influence model run for a proposed development located northeast of Eagle and Columbia Roads. The proposed development shown in Figure 1 will consist of 210 single-family units. Buildout is estimated by 2028, 2030 was used for this analysis. 13 bS a 11320 313 r� 4} �1 l� W a t� m Proposed 7379 314 a MERbTATE —rnreR a�Ew,ava�ssro.r ——- FROFOEEo OTHER rREEMY c_: i FRiL^FAlFrZTERabl ——- FROFO1,E6FR4KP�AMERYv Columbia Rd i iYJ7L kSZTAi Y{ M CE13MD W N F AR UZ A. QP1324 332 --- WOE'arEocaaEcror< Figure 1 Table 1 provides the existing demographics for TAZ 1319 and the proposed development's demographics used for the area of influence model run. Table 1 2025 2030 2055 (Proposed HH Jobs HH Jobs HH Jobs TAZ 1319 22 10 232 10 26 10 Surrounding TAZs 413 83 725 85 1336 105 Total 435 93 957 95 1,362 115 Figure 2:Area of Influence Figure 3: Peak Hour Demand with Proposed Development Figure 4: Peak Hour Demand without Proposed Development Figure 5:Surrounding Area TAZs Official Demographics Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, and Figure 9: Compounded Annual Growth Rates Note to Reviewers: The primary purpose of this report is to help agencies determine the scope of a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) and to assist TIS preparers in establishing trip distributions. New demand forecasted by the regional model for a proposed development may not match ITE Trip Generation estimates and they are not intended to replace the trip generation process of the TIS. Disclaimer Regarding Updated Model: The results documented in this report are based on the latest regional model, maintained by COMPASS, released in October of 2021, and based on the COMPASS 2050 Vision adopted in August 2021. Due to changes in demographics, TAZs, model network and model parameters, results should not be compared to those provided prior to October of 2021. ! ,• | ; ! / 02 ,-j PH_Im11 / # 2 T's ) 2 | � &% ^ _w my^ 2 , . « w» #� « ¥/m Esgl,e �.w A.m B,m , \ ) , { •, 6 § � m } £ $ ' 2 § § { ., � e B _ : ) -lid § m CL ) ., 0 a -m *�1)_v-il B_ems m 41 - � ° � 2 � . � 3 | � � % ] ) % ! § ` « 2 m m 2 (44 >eA»_ m . ;„ LL �\&IlsyAXM l kmi9A "cn n ro Sd t ai M 44 00- s 105 cis I' e G tb Nbiley Pore lS gm� 1S&MIEA � � � 43 !� 52 VIE Al 9 h C- a PH slsPuE 3 PH olupLaaolo Glavardels Rd PH slapaaaop Pa elapLaAo� PTA 27 E9 t> E9V`� +402 0 V Z9E 380 ZLE L+lv 2 97" i ax4 ii9 5 qh �32V ll �571 299 9�s sru PH 81EIPianol� a PH BIE31 Gloverdele Rd PH aIaPLEvwp PH0A!pja+'+G:� � � � Phi ' w 91 Stswert Rd rP g qq 92 i,i 'Stewart Rd Howry Ln 03 a xdl hx 105 fip, Howry Ln � 13 i'!� 4Z4 i9 87 f0 i0 IF LV ,$�%,T LGl 9P 49 Bo-En, 4 M d iii v fy�M rn H aIBa3 PN A5sq �! Eagle Rd � ,`�agla Rd PH WBa3 CP ' 41 i Pa mfte nit [3�! M1 � dim 374 C LL4 BIBe� � pdoWi Eagle Rd ^; igle Rd PH m5gq PHelBn �'BM anl3eluoV4 ,`� x x -'g 3 3 9 Atq � +C9�Ran8aLuo4'1 0 8 � A ry 6 K R' N N E2 —1 S amu na PP Qv)j9lsnaa O G]s Ql � l rUll pa anw�j 4snoo-I Lkl ar,oi2 lxnao7 Lpcuat Grove Rd PPJ enoiaj lsnaol 99E ` V M 9lV fh7C 3f12 Q O Zm zts 0V9 479 UV ull 491 °J 099 eACUO ?`o"I PH uvv+U Lsnaol pH EwwG 4snoo-I 412J swag tenaol Locust Grove Rd PH w-Q4 Lsnaal _0 ' N 0 >R >H a -O ul uejd fu _ ry o of PN uclPljeVl-eujlAj 69 o LI 1kX)7 19B'7 u�Lga t ;a Lund tE$t 5%l31d RLLd EH 89 143 2000 N d 900Z,- 2540 '-W7 tit P Tw. Lx 47 0 0`wxz 6DF7 KXT ` jPa ublpllsVi-eu n3ll H ,� 89(ku LW b $ ii PLy r C7 6 PH aleP�6A nq PH alaPDADI; Cloverdale Rd Pki�lew6Aq P�61ewenct7 6aR L ¢ EOV 461 4W EBC 300 7 fi 3211 VLS: sPa 9pg 929 57�,y:. 'dl'1 063 673 4s9 520 rvu PH slsPJeAoIC $ PH elaPJ"ai'IG Cloverdale Rd PSI al ePJGNM i PN etswaa D Ste Ste Howry Ln 63 E� 195 Howry Ln W 8ble Way h�q ZZZI. 29 67 �8 L9 p9 al. BV A0 &a BV 4 Freble Way 'b T OH el Bea {1 Eagle Rd Eagle Rd PH elBed x0 i PM M599 ryE r r 506 359 4 1103 560 ssro P}1 el6sa Eagle Rd 3991e Rd Pal s16sq P�algn 21 V a � K � N _ PHatvr�1sn9ol ,r m PH avoid{snaol Locust Grove Rd Gooust Grove Rd `�4anoo3 Q N 15ir i7 416 yttr 377 330 ��� LL u CL £ 4` 541 4rA t V 571 A31 n 1 w �6V t Q PH WAWV mDol PM wryn osn;sol Locust Grove Rd Locust Grove Rd P?J waJ9 Lanw3 Q' fC Q 0 LM aLn Q 4 N 3 z Q CA 3 ul ua+d NN r L � � Q L Pf � k3 K o c � m Y EH69Kne-Meridian Rd] N n U {Pi uelq+eVl•eun71J®BH8 N 199+1 1960 21,04 N MI r3H 2623 i:z,z 2495 LzVzo 69 Nne-Meridian Rd} {R?1 usl greVt-Bun51]69 Hi; — Q30 MO LL n m . J | P�j Olen Q§0]3 ) mmt ^ e . � � m ' f 2 © Q e � - q � � k � - ff § ' � I2 e cri - - - - - S/ j � ~ ~ � 0 .� S m a|22E] / r = � 9 # _ g � fe � � \ e / § - - - - - - - - - - - - - a » \ 7 r | - - - - - \ / § \ \ § � / < ƒ < \ £ ) e E § « y $ a / / ! $ m f < EL k § } n 2 ) E ) E E E / E � e e < g £ ) ) E e E ® E § E f p G \ j § § § \ § \ § } \ � / | � { � ■ ■ ■ � � ! ` \ ; /2 § ! < ! b w R z e , F , a 4 w fNm�m m_/f a_w@ BmwG £ E� #� @ ` 7.7 How ) | 22 r q CE % 9 2 AmbleWayf ° 7� )2 � . ! e R m amm PH 4� £ �.@ e.m a , ) � fN ) ; ' ! ) _ a ! [ , NA_»\n_/� ) ( ] ; t � \ ) ; \ / 7Q % e m� w, .o e 2 r 2 ( { * �_ - �_ as a_Rda___e PH >> s § 0 E 0 \ ] ; c � c y k m ! 2 ® � � { k k £ 0 0 0 \R : 0 \ u « u - q q \ \ ! E 4 ; £ @ Q \ o 17 0 . e! ozL 9, IF z i a a R a o ® aeeAea m m�JO«6694 `" 2 ~ \ R7 { Q ^ ƒ LL. ` ! ® L J w' R� el 17 Vol e 4.0 , a 6 {® Gm_m ° e_ o e_m_ mm_m »,_ C " � RCq fR ] ; R � R r \ e 67 _w m! } _ % k w R g 4 # @-m m Me .> a_, aim fw $; 2 ! ! �Ov&w R \w ] ; � � ( { � � \ ) - \ R ` \ \ \N ) / o # e w R w e A a \ m NJ�n»� @_,mn a_m_e y_+_\ m�,_DO m \ \2 = § « 7 / R ; A m > �` ! � 2 � _ «w, § \ ) cm / ` � ° § a ) ; e \ ! ` q 2 �� ; @ LJ ` L \ w , w t o o » ! # b 9 0 \ • >mar__Rd) mw_ gIOVH . , % ƒ ` L p ƒ � § . ! ) R e w D , 2 w N ® em_m e_ as e_w_ m,_� a,_�: OR ! - , r - ! j , f: ! a r{� .p � § e _w m! j ; . k @ # m a 4 ry e+m m Me .> a_, a41529 E: )c $ Q , ! a {® ] ! � § ( � ( a / { � � \ ) I k R {^ / , r e 2 2 2 0 : R 2 ( m + n» n_,_m y_m_e ym+_\ m ,_ m 41 $ , 7 : e ! c « ƒ Iliat2 ,a = re § \ / � \ R ~ a Ln } 2 { Ln e w 4 w � k a � >mar__m co km_hg1OPm � , ! , ® 2 § ` U £ ! , \ i Lj- \ k � ¢ e 04 G It m R # R £ em_m a_$\ a,_W n+�m w. ! * J j ® � ■ ° ) ; § 4 u w ( , o e & @ 2 ) ; w Z, , __m a r % . § 9 n e n w a-m m Me G3gle> a,m w.BVII $; Ir . g � d m E / ` \, ) ) ; 3 § m _ £ / ƒ ! ) 5 J \ # a # a » , a 2 m m�,_ POW"u* a_m_e ya+_R m W",_�EE \ f� \ � \ � �do \ + \ ,�a \ Ir &, \ I ) ` \ { cn \ e _ e m a G m f � >mar__Rd) k.Aew m4 s n / \