The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000 05-16MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 1612000 @ 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Roll -Cali: Tammy deWeerd Cherie McCandless Ron AndersonKeith Bird Mayor Robert Corrie Consent Agenda A. Tabled from May 21 2000: Approval of April 18, 2000, city Pre -council meeting minutes: a ?W V Z___ B. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Approval of April 18, 2000, City Council meeting minutes: o � -- C. Approval of May 2, 2000, Special city Pre -council meeting minutes:? 11>VX1_1 D. Approval of May 2, 2000, city Council meeting minutes: �� wLe- E. Tabled May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: CLAP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi -family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living centers - Joseph A. Billig - east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84: 457-6 �00 F. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: PP 99-010 Request for preliminary plat for proposed Bear creek Subdivision -- 326 single-family lots on 150-79 acres by Bear creek, LLC - east of Stoddard Road and south of overland: -/z� 2 tv/- 6 - 00 G. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: PP 00-016 Request for preliminary plat for 45 building lots on 8.25 acres for proposed Woodhaven subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. -- west of Eagle Road between overland and East Victory: H. Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: AZ 00-005 Request for annexation and Zoning of 20.26 acres for proposed Stratford Park for residential and professional offices from R -T (Ada County) to R-8 by Howell Murdoch Development corp: It pr-ovz� Page 1 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian City Council. I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: PP 00-004 Request for Preliminary Plat for 40 building lots on 3.98 acres in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. — northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: J. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a 40 -lot townhome development in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. — northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Move to the regular agenda K. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-007 Request for parking variance — request for no off-street parking for Generations Park Plaza I by Gary Benoit— at East 1st Street and West Idaho, Old Town: L. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Lave: CUP 00-0'10 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a proposed high --tech manufacturing facility I machine shop in a C -G zone on a vacant lot on Lot 5, Block Z of Troutner Business Park by Joseph Heilker: M. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: VAC 00-003 Request by Ronald C. and Rafanelli Nahas for a vacation of public utility easement in a C -G zone — Lots 12, 131 14, and 15 of Block 2 of central Valley Corporate Park No. 5: �� N. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-019 Request by Jeff and Mike Han for a conditional Use Permit for planned unit development for two principle buildings on a single lot in Honor Park Subdivision No. 2 in a C -G: zone — 357 E. Watertower Lane: V-9-- 0. Development Agreement: AZ 99-023 Request for annexation and zoning of 8.25 acres to R-8 for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Wood I D.W., Inc. — west of Eagle Road between Overland and East Victory: r `� 5� Regular agenda l. AZ 99-023 ordinance No. ,11— : Request for annexation and zoning of 8.25 acres to R-8 for proposed Woodhaven subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. — west of Eagle Road between Overland and East Vi cto ry : ._ • r� 2. Tabled from May 2, 2000: CUP 00,-012 Request for conditional Use Permit for Maple Grove RV for RV sales, RV retail and repair in an I -L zone — 2490 W. Franklin Road: -7'�t 6&iz� 2 �—b -00 Page 2 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian city Council. 3. Tabled from May 2, 2000: FP 00-004 Request for Final Plat approval of 32 building lots and 5 other lots on 12.801 acres in an R-4 zone for Tarawood Subdivision by Michelangelo Investments, LLC l Frank Stoppello: 4,,vry 4. Tabled from may 2, 2000: FP 00-007 Request for Final Plat approval of 102 lots and 14 other lots on 31.94 acres in an R-4 zone by Projects Vilest, Inc., for English Gardens Subdivision: �w6-00 5. Continued Public Hearing from April 103 2000: CUP 00-006 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for existing car dealership (2 buildings) on front four acres and proposed 72,000 s.f. Fairview Mini -Storage on the back four acres --1005 East Fairview Avenue: + � b-6 -ori 6. Public Hearing: VAR 00-008 Request for parking variance -- reduction in required parking spaces for Generations Park Plaza 11 by Gary Benoit - at East 1st Street and East Pine Avenue: 7, Public Hearing: Az 00-006 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for annexation and zoning of 12.73 acres from R --T to L -o and R-15 zones - northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: Alocecl�e e&,,rw-�L,� 8. Public Hearing: PP 00-005 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for Preliminary Plat for 12.73 acres with 10 building lots and 2 other lots on 12.73 acres in proposed L -o and R-15 - northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: 9. Public Hearing: CUP 40-014 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights subdivision for conditional Use Permit for a 128 -unit apartment complex, townhouses and office on 12.73 acres in proposed L-0 and R-15 zones- northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: r 10. Public Hearing: Az 00-007 Request for annexation and zoning of 6.68 acres from RT to L -G for proposed carol Professional center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. - west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and U sti ck Road: a" �, 1,,3,,p, k fr el�e 11. Public Hearing: CUP 00-020 Request for conditional Use Permit to construct 8 office buildings on 6.68 acres in proposed L -o zone for proposed carol Professional center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. -- west side of Eagle Road b tween Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: Page 3 Matefials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian city council. 12. Public Hearing: PP 00-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of eight lots on 0.08 acres in proposed L_C zone for proposed Carol Professional Center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. — west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: r 13. Public Hearing AR 00-009 Request for a variance to defer landscaping and asphalting of the parking lot for up to 24 months to allow applicant to design and construct a building in an I -L zone by James Aimonetto — 2204 E. Lanark St.: `/ 14. Public Hearing: RZ 00-002 Request for rezone of 70.24 acres from I -L to R-4 for all phases of Crossroads Subdivision — Y4 mile south of Fairview Avenue on the east side of Ea le Road: 15. FP 00-008 Request for Final Plat approval of 50.0 acres with 104 building lots and 41 other lots in an R-4 zone for Woodbridge Subdivision by Woodbridge Community, LLC — east side of South Locust Grove % mile south of Franklin Road: `e 15. TE 00-003 Time Extension, on the final plat of Gemtone subdivision No. 4 by Becky Bowcutt Planning Services at NE % section 8, T3N, R1 E (west of Hickory Avenue between Pine and State): 'et'V-� 6 A M,�r 17. Amendment of ordinance No. 857: AZ 99-024 Request for annexation and zoning of 20.05 acres to I -L by Albertson's, Inc. - east of Eagle Road, north of the railroad tracks and south of settler's canal: 18. Tabled rom May 15, 2000: Water, Sewer and Trash delinquencies: �P/�"V-Z� 19. Department Reports: A. city Treasurer— Janice Smith: 1. Treasurer's Report: Ofuey"e'�°Z�fe�vh'"-v B. City Councilperson - Tammy deWeerd: 1. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Pathway Master Plan committee I Sub -committee of Parks and Recreation commission: Page 4 Materiels presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian City council. C. City Engineer — Gary Smith 1. Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project Change order No. 2: "iv v�J 2. VWVTP Trunk Sewer — Creason Lateral Crossing Change order No. 1: lryv v---- 3. Year 2000 Sewer Line Cleaning 1 TV Inspection Project Contract Award: ,,, V7 Page 5 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian City Council. R MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MAY 187 2000 a@ 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Roll -call: X Tammy deWeerd X Cherie McCandless X Ron Anderson X Keith Bird X Mayor Robert Corrie Consent Agenda A. Tabled from May Z, 2000: Approval of April 18, 2000, City Pre -Council meeting minutes: Approve B. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Approval of April 18, 2000, City Council meeting minutes: Approve C. Approval of May 2, 2000, Special City Pre -Council meeting minutes: Approve D. Approval of May 2, 2000, City Council meeting minutes: Approve E. Tabled May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi -family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living Centers - Joseph A. Billig — east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84: Tabled until June 8, 2000 F. Tabled from May 29 2000: Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: PP 99-010 Request for preliminary plat for proposed Bear creek Subdivision — 320 single-family lots on 150.79 acres by Bear Creek, LLC - east of Stoddard Road and south of Overland: Tabled until June G, 2000 G. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: PP 00-018 Request for preliminary plat for 45 building lots on 8.25 acres for proposed Woodhaven subdivision by Dan Wood l D.W., Inc. -- west of Eagle Road between overland and East Victory: Approve Page 1 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian city pouncil. H. Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: AZ 00-005 Request for annexation and zoning of 20.25 acres for proposed Stratford Park for residential and professional offices from R -T (Ada County) to R-5 by Howell Murdoch Development corp: Approve 1, Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: PP 00-004 Request for Preliminary Plat for 40 building lots on 3.95 acres in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Approve revised Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law J. Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law: CUP 00-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a 40 -lot townhome development in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. - northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Move to the regular agenda -- Approve revised Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law K. Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law: VAR 00m-007 Request for parking variance -- request for no off-street parking for Generations Park Plaza I by Gary Benoit - at East 1st Street and West Idaho, Old Town: Approve L. Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law: CUP 00-018 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a proposed high-tech manufacturing facility I machine shop in a C -G zone on a vacant lot on Lot 5, Block 2 of Troutner Business Park by Joseph Heilker: Approve M. Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: VAC 00-003 Request by Ronald C. and Rafanelli Nahas for a vacation of public utility easement in a C -G zone - Lots 12, 131 14, and 15 of Block 2 of central Valley Corporate Park No. 5: Approve N. Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law: CUP 00-019 Request by Jeff and Mike Hon for a conditional Use Permit for planned unit development for two principle buildings on a single lot in Honor Park Subdivision No. 2 in a C -,G zone — 357 E. Watertower Lane: Approve o. Development Agreement: AZ 99-023 Request for annexation and zoning of 5.25 acres to R-5 for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. ---- west of Eagle Road between Overland and East Victory: Approve -- Resolution No. Regular Agenda Page 2 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian City council. r 1. AZ 99-023 ordinance No. 874: Request for annexation and zoning of 8.25 acres to R-8 for proposed Woodhaven subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. -- west of Eagle Road between overland and East Victory: Approve 2. Tabled from May 2, 2000: CUP 00-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit for Maple Grove RV for RV sales, RV retail and repair in an I -L zone -- 2490 W. Franklin Road: Tabled until June 5, 2000 3. Tabled from May 21 Zoon: FP 00-004 Request for Final Plat approval of 32 building lots and 5 other lots on 12.801 acres in an R-4 zone for Tarawood Subdivision by Michelangelo Investments, LLC 1 Frank Stoppello: Approve 4. Tabled from may 2, 2000: FP 00-007 Request for Final Plat approval of 102 lots and 14 other lots on 31.94 acres in an R-4 zone by Projects Vilest, Inc., for English Gardens Subdivision: Tabled until June 5, 2000 5. Continued Public Hearing from April 18, 2000: CUP 00-008 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for existing car dealership (2 buildings) on front four acres and proposed 72,000 s.f. Fairview Mini -Storage on the back four acres -- 1 005 East Fairview Avenue: Continue public hearing to June 5, 2000 5. Public Hearing: VAR 00-008 Request for parking variance -- reduction in required parking spaces for Generations Park Plaza ll by Gary Benoit sf — at East 1 Street and East Pine Avenue: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law for approval 7. Public Hearing: AZ 00-005 Request by Vicki Welker I Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for annexation and zoning of 12.73 acres from R -T to L -C and R-1 5 zones - northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for denial 8. Public Hearing: PP 00-005 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights subdivision for Preliminary Plat for 12.73 acres with 10 building lots and 2 other lots on 12.73 acres in proposed L-0 and R-1 5 - northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for denial Page 3 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian City Council. 9. Public Hearing: CUP 00-014 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for conditional Use Permit for a 128 -unit apartment complex, townhouses and office on 12.73 acres in proposed L -o and R-18 zones-- northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for denial 10. Public Hearing: AZ 00-007 Request for annexation and zoning of 8.88 acres from RT to L -o for proposed carol Professional center by J -U --B Engineers, Inc. - west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law 11. Public Hearing: CUP 00-020 Request for conditional Use Permit to construct 8 office buildings on 8.88 acres in proposed L -o zone for proposed carol Professional center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. — west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for approval 12. Public Hearing: PP 00-007 Request for Preliminary Plat approval of eight lots on 8.88 acres in proposed L -o zone for proposed carol Professional Center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. — west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 13. Public Hearing VAR 00-009 Request for a variance to defer landscaping and asphalting of the parking lot for up to 24 months to allow applicant to design and construct a building in an I -L zone by James Aimonetto — 2204 E. Lanark St.: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for approval for 12 months 14. Public Hearing: RZ 00-002 Request for rezone of 78.24 acres from I -L to R-4 for all phases of crossroads Subdivision — 1/4 mile south of Fairview Avenue on the east side of Eagle Road: Attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for approval 15. FP 00-008 Request for Final Plat approval of 50.9 acres with 184 building lots and 41 other lots in an R-4 zone for Woodbridge Subdivision by Woodbridge community, LLC — east side of South Locust Grove % mile south of Franklin Road: Tabled until June 8, 2000 18. TE 00-003 Time Extension on the final plat of Gemtone Subdivision No. 4 by Becky Bowcutt Planning Services at NE % Section 8, T3N, Rl E (west of Hickory Avenue between Pine and State): Approve six-month time extension Page 4 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian City Council. 17. Amendment of ordinance No. 857: Az 99-024 Request for annexation and zoning of 20.05 acres to I -L by Albertson's, Inc. — east of Eagle Road, north of the railroad tracks and south of Settler's Canal: Approve 18. Tabled from May 16, 2000: Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Approve 19. Department Reports: A. City Treasurer—Janice Smith: 1. Treasurer's Report: Refund of latecomers overpayments B. City Councilperson - Tammy deWeerd: 1. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Pathway Master Plan Committee 1 Sub-Committ6e of Parks and Recreation Commission: Discussed C. City Engineer -- Gary Smith 1. Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project Change Order No. 2: Approve 2. WWTP Trunk Sewer — Creason Lateral Crossing Change Order No. 1: Approve 3. Year 2000 Sewer Line Cleaning 1 TV Inspection Project Contract Award: Approve Page 5 Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the Meridian City Council. Meridian Ci Pre -council Meeting May 16.j 2000 The Special Pre -Council meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 8:35 p.m. on Tuesday, May 18, 2000, by Mayor Robert D. Corrie. Members present: Robert Corrie, Cherie McCandless, Ron Anderson, Tammy d eWee rd , Keith Bird. Others present: Bill Nichols, Shari Stiles, Janice Smith, Gary Smith, Ken Bowers, Bill Gordon, Pauline Skeggs, Will Berg, Cathy Dennison. Corrie: Okay, we'll open the Pre -Council meeting of the City of Meridian on May 1 8, 2000, at 8:35 p.m. Staff, comments, questions? Excuse me. Comments to staff? Okay. Yes. From the (inaudible) from ACHD and the BUS. I'm sorry. Nelson: Just wanted to come tonight and briefly let you know what's going on with our commuter shuttles. We do have a few copies here (inaudible -- walked away from the mic) some of the information was left out on a couple of the copies. So if you have a blank space, you know (inaudible). Yes. They're rough copies. It's a draft. These are the ones that we're using in the interim. It's on this one. You've got the "T"? On our printer, this afternoon, some of the things were dropped off. There's one area that has no pick-up points, but we'll get you a good copy. The mid-day shuttle did start on April 3`d. We do have a count on April's ridership. We had 185 rides from Caldwell, Karcher Mall, into Meridian, and 178 from Meridian into Boise during the month of April. That was a brand new month. We haven't done very much advertising on it. The Statesman did do a story one week after we got started. They hadn't done anything since then. So right now we've got Rosemary Curtin that we've hired to do kind of a grass- roots effort to outreach to the schools, to businesses. We'll start our commuter shuttle on the 5th of June. We have a contractor, Treasure Valley Transit, which is the same contractor that's doing the mid-day shuttles that is going to be doing the commuter shuttles, too. So we'll actually have service in Meridian from 7:00 in the morning until 8:00 in the afternoon. There's one extra run in the middle of the day that TVT has put on without charge to us, so there's five trips in the mid- day, and then we'll have four in the morning, four in the afternoon. So we'll have all -day service. Like I said before, it starts the 5th of June, and we're working with businesses on the Boise side to get some employees to know about the service and start utilizing it as soon as it starts. We will be having, we hope to have a breakfast kickoff on the 5th of June. You're all invited to come down at 5:00 in the morning if you want to. Bird: Where's it at? Nelson: It'll be somewhere in the neighborhood of Gem Street. Either the bowling alley or the restaurant across the street to have breakfast. We'll have a little hoop-lah here in Meridian, and then carry dignitaries across into Boise and �f Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 2 have another hoop -fah on that end. Have the Mayor of Meridian, the Mayor of Boise be some of the speakers unless you other folks want to talk. deWeerd: At six a.m.? 1 don't talk. Nelson: Well, the dignitaries' bus will leave here at about 8:30 and have the other ceremony on that end about 9:00. So Mayor Corrie has said that he will cook pancakes for us if we wanted to do that. So we're still in the process of putting that all together as we know more details as we get into it. We just wanted to let you know that it is alive and well, and we've working toward getting it up and running. Rosemary Curtin has a couple of things that she wants to cover with you to see if we can't get some help on another avenue. Curtin: Just real quick. Part of what we'd like to do is engage you all in helping us support and market this program. So I will probably be calling you individually asking you to brainstorm with the community leaders that are worthwhile to us to go out and speak. I called Mayor, I called Jack today, and out at the homeowners for Cherry Lane, I believe — delightful. We'll be bringing him a stack of brochures. He's going to try to get those to his neighbors that he knows that will more than likely use the service. So if you all start thinking and be ready for a phone call, and see if we can -- we've almost scientifically got this down that we would like almost 50 people on that bus by the end of June. That's doable. That's — each one of these buses, I think, carries 16 people. So if you kind of take it in small increments like that, it's very doable to make this successful, and you get to add more routes and more conveniences to your residents. Nelson: One thing that I would add that Rosemary has talked to the School District, and there are fliers that are going to be printed that are going to go out to all the school kids so that they can utilize that mid-day transportation out to Boondocks and Roaring Springs. We also have two of the runs that are going to be on the commuter side will serve Boondocks and Roaring Springs, too. So you'll have that afternoon connection back to their homes either in Boise or in Nampa or Meridian. So it's good partnership. Bird: Thank you. Nelson: Any questions? Anderson: Has there been any effort to advertise it to the senior citizens' center down here? Nelson: We took brochures down there, but I think It's going to actually take going down and sitting down and seeing those folks work through a schedule that works out best for them. Boise Towne Square Mall has also agreed that they would put brochures out and help promote that on that end. That might be one of the destinations of St. Luke's and St. Al's has passed out the mid-day shuttle {r' E Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 3 brochures to doctors' offices around the facility. That's another draw right there. But anybody that you can think of that we might go out one on one, we've got an appointment with Kiwanis to talk to the spokesman. Any of the civics groups, we'd be happy to come out and talk one on one with them. Anderson: Will had a good idea that maybe you could have a bus or a banner or something in the Dairy Days Parade just to help promote it and let citizens know that you're out there, Nelson: When is that? Bird: Second or third week in June. Usually the second. Nelson: We're also looking at banners across the main street if you know somebody to talk to about that. We'd be happy to work with that, too. Bird: is that one still set up for that one by Zamzow's? Carrie: I haven't seen it for awhile, but it might be. Bird: They used to have a string across there that you could set up right over the railroad tracks there. You have to get permission from ACHD. Nelson: I can do that. Thank you. Corrie: okay. Questions on the agenda? Anderson: I haven't gotten that far. E. Tabled May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: CUP 99-039 Request for Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development including cont.inuing care retirement community, single- and multi -family residential and office and retail use by Touchmark Living Centers - Joseph A. Billig -- east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84: F. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: PP 99-010 Request for preliminary plat for proposed Bear creek Subdivision — 320 single-family lots on 150-79 acres by Bear Creek, LLC — east of Stoddard Road and south of Overland: Berg: Mayor, members of the Council, we have not received Development Agreements for Touchmark or Bear Creek, so those items will have to be tabled again. Stiles: Do you know why they're not signing them? t Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 15, 2400 Page 4 Berg: Touchmark is just getting -- G, Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: PP 00-016 Request for preliminary plat for 45 building lots on 8.25 acres for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Wood I D.W., Inc. -- west of Eagle Road between overland and East victory: Corrie: Was there a question about Woodhaven? Stiles: The only thing on Woodhaven, Item G, is they have submitted a revised plat that I would like the Findings to reflect the new revision date that would appear on Pages 2, 3 and 4. Bird: Wait a minute. What's the date? Stiles: What is the date? Bird: Woodhaven, the last thing we said when we approved that is no more changes on your plat. What is the date of the plat? Stiles: Is that Woodhaven? We asked them for changes on the plat because the plat didn't comply with our R--8 standards. Bird: What's the date on the plat? Stiles: The new one they submitted is May 8, 2000. Bird: That's the one we got. Stiles: And the development Agreement has been signed on that one. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, can I address a point of order for Shari? We called — I think this was the developer. I had Marlene call and ask for the numbers on the plat. Have you checked those Findings if they don't match up with the numbers? Stiles: You asked them for the numbers? Nichols: Yes, because we weren't getting — we hadn't gotten that final one, so we just went directly to the developer to get it so we could have some information -- have you checked these proposed Findings? Stiles: The only ones I have are from last time. Nichols: okay. Meridian city Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 5 Stiles: I didn't have new ones. Just wherever it would reference 3--28 should reflect 5-8. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, in order to not put this off any longer, 1 think it would be okay if council approved these on the regular agenda and that counsel be instructed to submit a final one that anyplace the date appears it should say May 8t". With that we can just move on and not have this tabled again. Bird: Cho we need to pull it from the agenda? Nichols: I think it needs to be put onto the regular agenda. Bird: That's G, and how about 0, then? They have — Mayor, can we move that to 1 a? Because 1 is -- Corrie: Yes, G to 1a. Item 1. Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: PP 00-004 Request for Preliminary Plat for 40 building lots on 3.98 acres in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. — northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Item J. Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law: CUP 00-01 1 Request for conditional Use Permit for a 40 -lot townhome development in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. -- northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the council, if I may interject again. items I and J, there were some errors in my notes when I prepared these Findings of Fact. I submitted a memo to you asking for clarification on some of the items. In fact, Councilwoman deWeerd's motion did clarify those items, and it did refer to the May 2nd letter from Pinnacle Engineers had covered those things, and I didn't have that from the meeting, and it wasn't in my file folder. Mr. Berg had pointed that out to me today. I had revised those, and I have them here with those revisions in them if you want to move that to the regular agenda, I'll pass out the revised Findings, and you can look at those specific items if you wish. Bird: Where do you want to move it, Mayor? Corrie: 1 band 1 c. Bird: 1 band 1 c? okay. Corrie: That's I and J? Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page G (inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Item S. Continued Public Hearing from April 18, 2000: CUP 00.048 Request for a Conditional Use Permit for existing car dealership (2 buildings) on front four acres and proposed 72,000 s.f. Fairview Mini -storage on the back four acres — 1005 East Fairview Avenue: deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, may I ask a question of Shari? Shari, on No. 5 for the Fairview Mini Storage, are they making significant changes so that it may have to go through Planning and Zoning again? They've asked for it to be continued or tabled. Corrie: It's a public hearing — Stiles: I thought that was the one that you wanted to wait until they proposed some additional landscaping; isn't that the one that you — Corrie: They're the ones that sent the letter. Bird: We just asked them to come back. deWeerd: We just had some questions regarding their project. Stiles: I hadn't seen anything new at all on it. Corrie: It's a public hearing. (inaudible) dies. Stiles: They've never shown up and make a presentation — did they make a presentation to you ever? deWeerd: No, they never appear. Stiles: But you went ahead and talked about it? deWeerd: Yes. Stiles: I hadn't seen anything new, so — Corrie: If you want to keep continuing the public hearing, I don't know. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I think there is some confusion there. You were gone. What we had asked or what the Council had asked was that they come back. They had some questions on the road, and we had nobody here from their part to answer. The question was whether that road was theirs or not if I remember right. Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 7 deWeerd: No, the question was just that they -- it's a private road. Their project started directly off the road, and my question was just, you know, why. There was not a representative here, and Brad couldn't answer it. So we asked that a couple of the questions that were brought up that the applicant be able to answer those when they came back the next Council meeting. Then they had sent a letter requesting that they be postponed until this meeting. Now we have a letter asking it to be removed for an indefinite period of time. They're trying to negotiate for the purpose — the purchase — Stiles: Maybe they don't want to do anything. deWeerd: So shall we continue it until the next meeting, and in the interim you can find out what the timeframe is on this? Stiles: I sure will. Item 18. TE 00-003 Time Extension on the final plat of Gemtone Subdivision No. 4 by Becky Bowcutt Planning Services at NE % Section 8, T3N, R1 E (west of Hickory Avenue between Pine and State): deWeerd: okay, thanks. Mr. Mayor, I have one more question for Shari. Item 18 for a time extension for the final plat on Gemtone Subdivision, I couldn't find any information on that. Stiles: All they would have had would have been the actual letter, just the letter requesting it. This was the one where they came before the Council, they were doing another phase of Gemtone, and they had already been approved as a final plat with Pine Avenue in it, then they submitted another final plat taking Pine Avenue out of the plat. The Council directed them instead of proceeding with that plat to go back to the old version and just request an extension. So that's what they did. d eWee rd : Okay. Item 4. Tabled from may 2, 2000: FP 00-007 Request for Final Plat approval of 102 lots and 14 other lots on 31.04 acres in an R-4 zone by Projects West, Inc,, for English Gardens Subdivision: Stiles: Mr. Mayor, on Item 4 of the regular agenda, we would ask that to be tabled again to just revise the plat, and we don't have copies of the revised plat yet that we need to review. Corrie: English Gardens? Stiles: Yes. k �f Meridian city Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 8 deWeerd: Shari, do you have staff comments on that? Stiles: On English Gardens? No because it was -- we had some significant changes we are asking to it, and we didn't want to make our comments until they made the changes that we asked for. deWeerd: So when is that to be continued or tabled until? Stiles: Well, if they get that into us, it'll be three weeks before your next meeting on June 6. If they get it into us soon, we would be able to do our comments in time. deWeerd: So we should request to table that until June 6ffi? Stiles: Yes. Corrie: Any other items? Item 2. Tabled from May 2, 2000: CUP 00-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit for Maple Grove RV for RV sales, RV retail and repair in an I -L zone -- 2490 W. Franklin Road: Corrie: On Item No. 2, I believe you had a meeting with Maple Grove RV. The Council last time was trying to see if we could find out some changes for the Conditional Use Permit. I believe we had a meeting, is that correct, with the applicant and the Fire Marshal and you and Daunt? Stiles: Yes. Corrie: And there was still some questions of what can and can't be done? Is that correct? They're trying to figure out if they can use the dry chemical and the wall and that part of it? Stiles: I didn't know that was being discussed still. They were talking about a firewall, but I don't know if chief Bowers has any other information. What we had discussed in the meeting was a firewall. Bowers: Talking to the Fire Marshal, Daunt, the building inspector, would have them put in a firewall and divide it up into two parts at this part of the building. To my knowledge, there wasn't anything said about sprinkler systems or water systems or anything at that time. Corrie: So we're still not quite sure what to do on that yet; is that correct? Bowers: Attorney Bill Nichols was there. Possibly he might be able to help out on that, too. Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 9 Corrie: Do we need to discuss that (inaudible) meeting? Regular agenda? What I'm looking at is if we're going to have enough information, then we can table that until we get everybody on board. I didn't have to talk to you, I guess. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, I believe if you leave it on the regular agenda, I can certainly give you my perspective of the meeting and what I think the remaining issues are, and then you can, Mr. Dugan can respond to those if he's here. Then you can decide whether to continue it or make a decision. Corrie: Any thing else? Shari? Stiles: Mr. Mayor, Council, I had a request from Ada County yesterday. I know it's not on the agenda, but they have asked for a response on Star's area of impact. They're proposing to come clear to Meridian's area of impact and south of Chinden. I didn't know if any of you had any comments on that whether you even saw a copy of the application when that came in. Corrie: No. Bird: Haven't seen it. Corrie: Haven't seen anything. Stiles: Well, since they are in mediation now on their area of impact, the 10 -year limitation may not even apply to Star. They may just get the area of impact if the mediation goes in their favor. Corrie: The last I talked to the Star Mayor, their area of impact that they said they were going to ask for did not extend south of Meridian -- Chinden Boulevard. Stiles: They have requested — Corrie: They have requested that now? Corrie: That's a lot of territory that the Ada county Commissioners don't see eye to eye o n . Stiles: Right, and that's why their in mediation now. They think — their county is afraid that they're not going to be able to impose that technical assurance clause for serving all of that area within the 10 -year timeframe, but the County Commissioners just want to know if we have any concerns about extending south of Chinden. Meridian city Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 90 Corrie: I don't thunk the council has had a chance to talk about it yet. I think it's a little premature. Stiles: So do you want me to — Corrie: The proposals are — we had some concerns. They're not going to — do I understand you right that they're not — wouldn't include the 10 -year that they have the sewer and water in the 10 years like they did us? Stiles: They are — they're concerned that as part of that mediation process that they're not going to be able to impose all of their requirements that the County has. Corrie: I would certainly like to hear what the County has to say. Stiles: They do want some type of response. Do you vivant me to just tell them that the city does have a concern with that area of impact? Corrie: We'd like to hear what it is. Stiles: Then we'll bring it back before council on June Bt'? Corrie: council, comments? Bird: I'd like to see a map. Corrie: I would, too, because that's not what I was told. Going another (inaudible) into this formula. Stiles: Okay, thanks. Item 15. FP 00-008 Request for Final Plat approval of 50.9 acres with 164 building lots and 41 other lots in an R-4 zone for Woodbridge Subdivision by Woodbridge community, LLC — east side of South Locust Grove % mile south of Franklin Road: Smith: Mr. Mayor, Item No. 15 on the regular agenda, Woodbridge Subdivision, we have a lack of information, for lack of a better word, on the water system in that area as far as what we can supply and what the requirements are going to be for connection of that subdivision. We've had a problem with getting information from our consultant, and at this point we do not have it. I've talked to Bill Nichols about it, and it's his recommendation that we table this until the next City Council meeting. Then Shari said there's another issue concerning road names that needs to be answered by you and the fire and police services. k Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 1 F, 2000 Page 11 Corrie: I believe there's also that Nampa Meridian has a little question on the use of the ditch. Smith: okay. I've talked to the applicant's engineer, and Shari has talked to the applicant about this issue. We just felt that it was better to get this water supply required connection nailed down before the final plat is before you for approval for your action so we don't have that loose end. I consider that a pretty major loose end. That would be my recommendation. Thank you. Corrie: okay. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, Gary, did you speak to Woodbridge? Are they going to be here tonight? Did you already speak with them? Smith: I talked to their engineer. I did not talk to the applicant, and he did not tell me whether they were going to be in attendance or not. Corrie: Any other questions? Item G. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: PP 00-016 Request for preliminary plat for 45 building lots on 8.25 acres for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. — west of Eagle Road between Overland and East Victory: Item o. [development Agreement: AZ 99-023 Request for annexation and zoning of 8.25 acres to R-8 for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. — west of Eagle Road between Overland and East Victory: Stiles: Mr. Mayor, I'm sorry. I did receive revised Findings on the Woodhaven plat today that had the correct date on them. So that doesn't need to be brought up. We still have the Development Agreement issue, but can that be left on the Consent Agenda now? Corrie: G you mean? Bird: Just leave it on the consent, then? Stiles: G and then the O. Was that the -- Bird : O was left on anyway. Stiles: Okay. Sorry about that. (inaudible discussion amongst Council members) i Meridian City Pre -council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 12 Corrie: Staff, anymore comments? Stiles: I don't. Corrie: Okay. I want to do — Council, do you want to hear some of the department reports? Bird: Yes. Item 19. Department Reports: A. City Treasurer— Janice Smith: 1. Treasurer's Report: Corrie: Janice, City Treasurer. Smith: Thank you, Mayor and Council members. You received at your chair there this evening the balance sheet. I did want to go over on the first page of the balance sheet. This three-page balance sheet. More or less, if you were comparing it to last month, you will notice that in the Enterprise Account, there was more money in the cash in the bank. What we'd done is we had closed a non-active account from US Bank. We were only getting two percent, two point something percent, so we moved it into the Farmers and Merchants where we were getting 5.4 on that. We will be using that for projects that we will not have to take as much money out of our investments as the projects become completed. So, more or less, there was $852,000 put into that account if you noticed a jump. . Anderson: In which account? Smith: It's in the Enterprise -- in the cash in the bank. You probably didn't have time to compare since you got it this evening. ON the second page where it's actually page 1 of 1 on our summary of investments, if you just compare, if you take this home tonight, after the meeting tonight, go home and compare our totals against our Buffington Moore, we show the $30,000,818 and they show $30,000,817. They're off on my amount of $1,700. I think it's — we feel it's their error. We show it in their detailed report which is lots of pages, so we have a message into them to please check that and correct it. So if you do compare theirs, we feel ours is correct. A change that you'll see in expenditure reports, that's the all the departments' expenditure reports that we'll be doing this month after the approval of the May 2nd council meeting minutes, the Parks Department had requested to move the $33,000 to the equipment account because they had purchased a Bobcat, are purchasing a Bobcat, taking that from the pathway and rentals. It was approved — his inner --office memo from the Parks Department to us said it was approved, just waiting for the approval which is on the agenda Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 13 tonight. As soon as we get those minutes, that'll be done. On Page 27 on his, you'll see that he's getting pretty close to being in the red because of some purchases. That'll offset that. Did you have any other questions on the expenditure report or the investments because I do have a couple other items, and I don't want to go too long. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, Janice, can you explain that one more time about the Parks? Smith: The Parks? The Parks director requested to move $33,000 into their equipment account, move that to that and they're taking it out of the pathway and rental account. deWeerd: Okay. Smith: In the end, they still balance. The bottom line will still be the same. It's just so it doesn't run into the red. deWeerd: Thank you. I have one more question. Janice, can we get an update on the budget calendar? Smith: Sure. I'll put it in your box tomorrow, and don't forget that next Tuesday we have a special workshop that you guys will be able to see on a screen here how the software works. It's really great. We're cleaning everything up. I'll put that in your box. I do have two other things here. It was brought up May 2nd, the latecomers. You requested that the final — May 2d on the Council meeting, it was brought up on the latecomers on some — we over -collected on some fees, so we're refunding back to the builders that were over -collected. So this is the list of all the builders with the 12 percent interest up through May, so we've got to get this done by May so that otherwise, if it goes into June, we'll have to calculate June on — talked to our attorney, Bill Nichols, and we'll follow up with a fetter, a voucher. Hopefully get those out before the end of May. So I just -- so you have this, I would like to have that approved. Bill, did you have any comment on this? Did you get this list? Nichols: I have the list, and Mayor, members of the Council, I'd like to — what Janice is asking for is you to approve the refunds so on the regular agenda under Department Reports if you could approve these refunds, then we could get the refund claim forms and letters out and so forth so those folks can get what's due. Corrie: Okay. Smith: Did you have any questions on any of these refunds? I know you got a list before breaking it down to 0 percent and 12 percent. Anderson: What is the total that we're refunding? L Meridian City Pre -council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page '14 Smith: It'd be the 287. Bird: How far back do these go, Janice? Smith: On the Western states, they're way back, but it was also interpretation of the agreements because we had a problem with that is why some of them are so low. I think in 1995 I had a letter that I felt at that time Western States was done, complete, other than we didn't calculate any interest in it. All the other agreements had the interest calculated in, so we felt that we wanted to be consistent. Bird: These go back, basically, since we put the sewer under the freeway? Smith: Yes. But it really boomed over there, too. Bird: Have we got in place now so that we don't have this happen? Smith: Yes, and I think with our new agreements between the engineering and the developer right up front, and Bill Nichols worked with them on that is that we're going to collect it from the developer. We're not going to have any of this collecting it from the builder and then refunding the developer. It's just too much -- it's an accounting nightmare. Bird: So there's not going to be anymore latecomer fee agreements? Is that what you're telling me? Smith: I'll have Bill comment on that. Nichols: Councilman Bird, Mayor, members of the Council, we'll still have latecomer agreements, but what Janice is referring to is when the latecomer fees are collected from the later development. Currently they are being collected as the building permits are pulled, and now we're going to collect them as that later development gets to the final plat stage so that when that development is ready to sell those lots, they will have paid the latecomer fee on all of those lots. So it'll cut down the number of receipts and make it easier for the treasurer to compute those and get them out to people that they're due. Bird: That's what I thought. Smith: Also no surprise to a builder when he goes and gets a permit. Oh, by the way, there are some latecomers fees because a lot of the times that's not calculated in when they're going to build a house. Bird: We're collecting up front on the complete development from the developer or whoever — fYf Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page '15 Smith: Right. Developer wants it in, he pays for it. Bird: That answered my question. Smith: So I'd like that on the agenda for later to approve those. Another thing that I brought tonight is some information on our LIDs. I'm not sure if the other two new Council members are familiar with the LIDs, but we'd have the — the City formed in 1991, it's Local Improvement District. This is just an update. Our LIDs are due June — the first part of June. If they're not paid by the end of June= they're past --due. Well, this is just an update. We only have 15 accounts left. We have two outstanding. The Tammy Shoemaker property, that's Item No. 11, we're working with an engineering department, I guess there's some changes that need to be made. So we're working with the Engineering Department, and as soon as that's done, we'll work out a payment schedule for her. The only other one that I would like to request, not tonight, but this is just a heads -up. Item No. — Property No. 15 has not made a payment. He's made one payment since 1991. We did send, he received all letters. We sent him a letter last week, and he came in yesterday. He doesn't want to pay it until he sells his property. That is the property north of Knotty Pine there. In between the Burger Den property there. But he had it for sale for a long time. It's not — so we told him, and follow up with our letters, is he will go ahead and get the bill for the LID, and that we would like to pursue putting a lien against the property. We don't want to wait until the LID is up front and due. This is the end of this is 2002. We'd like to pursue it now. We haven't in the past, but with the assistance of the city attorney and working with the county, we had the procedures to do it. We'd like it done before the LIDs at its term. So that's just a recommendation from our department to pursue this, and we'll get the formal process going after June 30 Other than the LID, that's all I had for this evening. *** End of Side 1 *** Smith: -- Thanks. Corrie: Questions on that? Anderson: On No. 11, the little note about the work is not complete, what's not done? Smith: I guess there was some changes that were requested and weren't satisfactory. The Engineering Department would have the comments on that. Smith: (Gary) Mayor, Council members, there's a very short block wall against the edge of the sidewalk. I guess two blocks high. They wanted the area between the sidewalk and the blocks grouted. That was never done. I've been in contact with a couple block masons to go out there and look at it, and I can't get them out there. I guess business is really good. I'm going to keep trying to Meridian City Pre -council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 16 find somebody to go look at it to see what's involved if that's really — I can't see why it's an issue or where it's an issue because nothing detrimentally is happening to the sidewalk or the wall. Anderson: Sounds like something that we need to take care of if we're going to collect on that. Smith: Yes. Corrie: Thank you, Janice. Smith: (Janice) Thank you. Corrie: Pauline, do you want to give your part about on this insurance between the two companies, and then we can later (inaudible) Skeggs: Mayor and councilmen, I'm not sure what information you've received. I've given information to Ron. We've been researching accident insurance because Lone Star has disband. They went with a 3`d Party Administrator, and this is the voluntary insurance that we're offering our employees. Therefore, we've solicited insurance companies to give us some bids, and what we've received is we've gotten two bids: one from AFLAC and one from American Heritage. The difference is that from AFLAC, that benefit is equal to the benefit that we were receiving from Lone Star. The cost difference is a little bit more expensive than American Heritage. American Heritage is $100 difference for the disability benefit that the employee's currently receive under Lone Star, and also their disability limit is six months versus a year that they were receiving from Lone Star. This is for our own employees plus our volunteer firefighters. The City pays for the volunteer firefighters along with the Rural commissioners with the firefighters. I'm not sure, Ron, have you had a discussion with the Rural in regard to it? I know I've been sending you information, and have they made a decision on where they want to go? Anderson: I have not, and I think they will go with whatever our committee recommends so that the last word that we heard, we were waiting for the committee to make a formal recommendation. Skeggs: I know that we met and even thought the cost is like $5 more, the benefit under AFLAC is equivalent to what we currently had. That's what we're proposing is to go with AFLAC versus American Heritage. They had on and off the job benefits. They were only going to give it to the white-collar workers, and then they agreed to give it to the blue-collar workers as well. We've had problems with American Heritage, going back, getting quotes. We actually had to go to the Vice President because they weren't responding back. So with the difference of $5, we think we're going to get the service that we need from AFLAC versus that we haven't even received from American Heritage, and we've Meridian City Pre -Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 17 already been — we haven't even gotten to an agreement with them. So that's what we're looking at. The embers were proposing AFLAC> Anderson: Thank you. Corrie: Any other questions? Thank you, Pauline. okay. Why don't we take a two -minute break if you want, and then we'll come back and I need to get some instructions to the people here tonight the way we're going to handle tonight's meeting and then there's a lot of people here tonight so that you'll know where we're going and what we're going to be doing. So I would like to have a motion for adjournment for about five minutes and then come back for our regular meeting. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we adjourn the Pre -Council meeting for five minutes. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to adjourn the Pre -Council meeting and come back in five minutes. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:35 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: RT D. CORRIE, MAYOR �I141 �4 t� O1F w Lri _V1 SEAL %lop. 41 � � 1 ATTEST: 1 J � dITY CLERK TeW Meridian city Council Meeting- Mav 16 ,,2000 The regularly scheduled City council meetingof the Meridian eridian city Council was called to order at 7:40 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16 2000 Y Y � by Mayor Robert D. Corrie. Members present: Robert Corrie, Cherie McCandless Ran Anderson, Tammy deweerd, Keith Bird. Others present: Shari Stiles, Janice Smith Ga Smith, h, Ken Bowers, Pauline Skeggs, Kathy Dennison, Bill Gordon, will Berg. g Corrie: Ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to call the meeting to order for the Meridian City Council, May 10, 2000, at 7:40t At . m . this time me we will have roll - call, Mr. clerk. Thank you. First I want to welcome everybody ry y here tonight. It's going to be a good night, I think. we're gain to have some rules ' g that we're going to have to set because there are a lot of people here tonight. I'll tell you about those after we get through with the Consent Agenda. g a. Also, !want to welcome Troop 185 from Meridian. Thank, ouguys, for being Y 9 Y, g her e tonight. Item A. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Approval of April 18 pp p , 2000, City Pre - Council meeting minutes: Item B. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Approval of April 18 pp p , 2000, city Council meeting minutes: Item C. Approval of May 2, 2000, Special cit Pre -Council y - Council meeting minutes.- Item inutes: Item D. Approval of May 2, 2000, City Council meeting minutes: Item E. Tabled May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and Conclusions � sons of Law. CUP 99-039 Request for conditional Use Permit forp lanned unit development including continuing care retirement community, single- and multi -family residential and office and retail use by Touch mark Living centers - Joseph A. Billig — east of St. Luke's between Franklin Road and Interstate 84: Item F. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and Conclusions g onclus�ons of Law: PP 99-010 Request for preliminary p proposed plat for Bear Creek Subdivision — 320 single-family lots on 150.79 acres by Bear Creek, LLC -- east of Stoddard Road and south of Overland: Item G. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Findings of Fact and Conclusions uslons of Law: PP 00-016 Request for preliminaryplat for 45 building lots p g on 8.25 acres for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 2 Wood 1 D.W. , Inc. — west of Eagle Road between Overland and East Victory: Item H. Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law: AZ 00-005 Request for annexation and zoning of 20.26 acres for proposed Stratford Park for residential and professional offices from R -T (Ada county) to R-8 by Howell Murdoch Development corp: Item I. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: PP 00-004 Request for Preliminary Plat for 40 building lots on 3.98 acres in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. -- northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Item J. Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law: CUP 00-011 Request for conditional Use Permit for a 40 -lot townhome development in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. — northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Item K. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: VAR 00-007 Request for parking variance — request for no off-street parking for Generations Park Plaza I by Gary Benoit — at East 1St Street and West Idaho, old Town: Item L. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-018 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a proposed high-tech manufacturing facility 1 machine shop in a C -G zone on a vacant lot on Lot 5, Block 2 of Troutner Business Park by Joseph Heilker: Item M. Findings of Fact and conclusions of Lava: VAC 00-003 Request by Ronald C. and Rafanelli Nahas for a vacation of public utility easement in a C -G zone — Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15 of Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5: Item N. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-019 Request by Jeff and Mike Hon for a Conditional Use Permit for planned unit development for two principle buildings on a single lot in Honor Park subdivision No. 2 in a C -G zone --- 357 E. Watertower Lane: Item o. Development Agreement: AZ 99-023 Request for annexation and zoning of 8.25 acres to R-8 for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. — west of Eagle Road between Overland and East Victory: Meridian City council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 3 Council, we have the first item that is the Consent Agenda. What is the Council's pleasure on that? Bird: Mr. Mayor, on the Consent Agenda, Item No. E and F are moved to table to June 6, 2000; Items I and G move to 1a and 1b on the regular agenda; with that I move that we accept the Consent Agenda. Anderson: Second that. Corrie: Motion's made by Mr. Bird, seconded by Mr. Anderson to accept the Consent Agenda with the tabling of Items E and F and Items I and J to be moved to the regular agenda to numbers 1a and 1b. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll -call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll -call: de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye Corrie: Now, on the regular agenda, let me as a couple of questions here tonight. On the public hearings, we have the public hearing on the Generations Plaza No. 2. Is there anyone here that's going to testify in that public hearing outside of the developer? We have one. Okay. on Items 7, 8 and g which is Valeri Heights Subdivision, show of hands who want to testify on that one. okay. On the Carol Professional Center, Item No. 10 and 11 and 12, how many besides the developer are going to be testifying on that one? You have one? okay. No. 13, public hearing -- variance request by James Aimonetto, is there anyone here that's going to be testifying on that one? Okay. crossroads Subdivision public hearing for a request for rezone. How many? Anybody here besides the developer or the applicant on that one? I believe Item No. 15 we're going to table until June 6 th. We have a problem on the water. Is the applicant here? Okay. Have you been -- okay. Thank you. okay. With the Council's approval, think that the one that a lot of the people are going to be here is the Valeri Heights Subdivision. Would the council be willing to hear the others first and then so that we don't have to have them cancel on some of the later ones or if you want to lust go ahead and go right down through the Iine we can. If we do that, I'm going to ask that on the Valeri Heights Subdivision, if you — whoever wants to talk first, you have about five minutes, and then the rest of you have the same thing, nothing new to add, then I'm going to ask you to raise your hands, and we'll have a count that has the exactly the same thing, feel the exact same way. If you have something else to add, we'll hear it. It's going to save us some time on this. We've got a lot of testimony here that we've already gone through, and we don't want to hear the same thing over and over by 10 or 12 people. So if you agree to that, I think we can go a lot quicker and be out of here before 2:00 in the morning. It's hard to make a decision at 2:00 in the morning, and we want to make a right one. [< E Meridian City Council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 4 Bird: Mr. Mayor, as I understand it, you want to move 7, 8 and 9 to right after Item 17? Corrie: Fifteen. Public hearing -- the last public hearing and the rest we'll do at the regular time. So after Item 14. So if everybody's agreed to that, we'll get to these others real quick and we can get to the Valeri Heights Subdivision. We have to approve this now if you want to do that. Bird: What about 10? That's just a time extension. Could we put those public hearings after that? Corrie: Is there anyone here that objects to that? okay. Bird: So we'll put the 7, 8 and 9 behind Item 15. Unidentified: Mr. Mayor, we never kind of got to say — I would just kind of like to limit it to say five minutes, raise hands of everybody — kind of did that in the Planning and Zoning meeting and didn't spend all night on it. Corrie: I'll limit it to three minutes if everybody wants to talk. What I'm trying to get at is if whoever gets up first will give whatever they want to say. If anybody else has anything different than that by a show of hands agree with that. If you have something different you want to say or that, we'll let you have the three minutes as well. 1 just don't want everybody to get up and say the same thing over and over because it gets really repetitious. Unidentified: I'm for that rather than going clear to the end. Corrie: You want us to do it the way it is? All right. We'll do it that way. Item 1. Findings of Fact and conclusions of Lav: PP 00-004 Request for Preliminary Plat for 40 building lots on 3.98 acres in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. -- northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Corrie: Item 1, Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, this is a request for preliminary plat for 40 building lots on 3.98 acres in an R-4 Zone for proposed Heron Brook Townhouse Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc., northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane. Staff, comments first on Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the council, we've made some revisions just today because of some errors in the proposed Findings. That's why we asked i Meridian city council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 5 that it be moved to the regular agenda. It has to do with Items 1.13 and 1.14 which deals with the setback requirements and the no on -street parking. We had not received a copy of the letter from the developer dated May 2nd. So that's been done. There were two things. The CUP and the preliminary plat. In the CUP, I think it's 1.13 and 1.14, the preliminary plat had to do with the turnaround requirement. If you recall, the testimony was that the turnaround was available near the clubhouse. So we've made those changes, but you didn't get them until tonight. Corrie: okay. Nichols: Mr. Unger represented that he's fine with the changes. I don't know if he's still here tonight or not, but I showed them to him. Corrie: Bob's not here, are you? He didn't raise his hand, but he was here earlier. Nichols: Yes, and I can represent to the council that he said the changes were acceptable to him. Corrie: okay. Any other questions of council? This is the first request, preliminary plat. Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for Item No. I which is now 1a, the preliminary plat for 3.98 acres. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and Order of conditional Approval of the preliminary plat dated 5115100 for Pinnacle Engineers known as Heron Brook Townhouse Subdivision, northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane. deWeerd: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to approve the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for request for preliminary plat on the 40 building lots of 3.98 acres for Heron Brook Townhomes Subdivision. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll -call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll -call: deWeerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item J. Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law: CUP 00-011 Request for Conditional Use Permit for a 40 -lot town home development in an R-40 zone for proposed Heron Brook Meridian city Counc11 Meeting May 16, Zoog Page 6 Townhome Subdivision by Pinnacle Engineers, Inc. northeast corner of Meridian Road and Blue Heron Lane: Corrie: Item lb which is the Item J in the Consent Agenda is Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law, the CUP 00-011, request for condi tional Use Permit for 40 -lot townhouse subdivision in an R-40 zone proposed for Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, we have some confusionof g ng on. l think the attorney just talked about Item 1.13 and 1.14 which was out of theconditional cond�t�onal use permit not the preliminary plat. We just voted on the preliminary .. p ry plat, so we — he was giving us conditions out of the one that we're working on now instead of the - Nichols: Right, and I apologize for the confusions Councilman Anderson, Mayor and Council. The only item we changed in the preliminary g p urinary plat was the item with regard to the Fire Department turnaround in front of the clubhouse lot. Items 1.13 and 1.14 in these Findings in the Conditional g Use Permit is what's being changed there. I apologize for the confusion. Anderson: okay. Just wanted toet on the same 9 page. Corrie: Has the applicant also approved this? Nichols: Councilman Bird, Mayor, members of the Council, again, 1 represent to the Council that Mr. Unger said he was okaywith our changes. Corrie: The record will reflect that. Okay. Any questions from Council? Bird: I have none. d eWee rd : Mr. Mayor, I'd like to move that we approve Findings pp a the F�nd�ngs of Facts and Conclusions of Law for the conditional Use Permit for Heron Brook Townhome Subdivision to include -- to note the changes on 511 g 6I00 and to have the Mayor sign and the clerk to attest. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and seconded to approve pp the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for the conditional Use Permit to include the changes made in the conditions. Any further comments? Hearing none, Mr. Clerk, would you take roll -call vote, please. Roll call• de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; e - Anderson . ,aye, Bird, aye MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES t Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 7 Item 1. Az 99-023 ordinance No. 874: Request q st for annexation and zoning of 8.25 acres to R--8 for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Wood 1 D.W., Inc. — west of Eagle Road between 9 overland and East Victory: Corrie: Item No. 1 Is Az 99-023, this is an Ordinance and Mr. clerk, what is the number on the Ordinance? Berg: 874. Corrie: Okay. Ordinance No. 874. This is a request forannexation and zoning of 8.25 acres to R-8 for proposed Woodhaven Subdivision by Dan Vllvod / D.1111.3 Inc. if the Clerk would please read Ordinance No. 874 by title t e on ly, please. Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Ordinance No. 874: An' Ordinance finding that certain land lies contiguous or adjacent to the City limits of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho; and finding that the owner h . . , g as made a request for annexation in writing to the Council; and that said land be annexed to the City of Meridian and zoning designation medium density residential tial district (R-8), and declaring that said land by proper legal description as g p described below be a part of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, state of Idaho; repealing p aiing ail Ordinances, Resolutions, Orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith and directing the City Engineer to add said property to the official maps of the City of Meridian, Idaho; directing the Clerk of the City of Meridian to file a certified copy of the ordinance and map of the areas to be annexed to Ada County Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-223 and Section 63-2215. Corrie: Is there anyone in the audience that would like that Ordinance No. 874 read in its entirety? Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on Ordinance No. 874. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would make a motion that we approve pp a Ordinance No. 874, request for annexation and zoningwith the proposed posed WoodhavenSubdivision with suspension of rules and the Mayor to sign y g and the Clerk to attest. Bird: I'll second it. Corrie: Motion is made and seconded to approve Ordinance ance No. 874. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll -call vote Mr. Berg. g Roil -call: de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; ; Anderson aye; Bi Y, e y, rd, aye MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES l Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 8 Item 2. Tabled from May 2, 2000: CUP 00-012 Request for Conditional Use Permit for Maple Grove RV for RV sales, RV retail and repair in an I -L zone — 2490 W. Franklin Road: Corrie: Item No. 2, tabled from May 2, 2000, CUP 00-012. Request for Conditional Use Permit for Maple Grove RV for RV sales, RV retail and repair in an I -L zone, 2490 west Franklin Road. Staff, comments. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, as we discussed in the Pre -Council meeting, we did meet with the applicant. The Building Inspector was there, the Fire Marshall was there. Bill Nichols was there. The Fire Marshal and Daunt Whitman, the Building official, did discuss some options for them to be able to utilize that building. It basically involved a fire wall which would have restricted their use on one side or the other. It would have had to contain their use for the welding equipment to one side of the building. There are stili issues as far as the zoning issues for the site plan as far as unpaved parking areas and landscaping requirements. I believe the major issue appears to still be the fire requirements. So maybe the applicant has some additional information -- he left the meeting with some choices to make, and I don't believe he had made any at that time, so we need to hear from him. Corrie: Other staff comments at this time? Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, I believe that the meeting boiled down on the fire issues of this. If you will recall, one of the concerns of the Planning and Zoning Commission level was that the existing buildings were not in compliance with the Fire Protection Code because it didn't have a sprinkling system in it. The building official and the Fire Marshal identified a portion of the Fire Protection Code which allows essentially a fire resistant bay to be established within the building with a one-hour fire rating barriers and doors so that any welding or cutting could be done in that particular area of the building. It would not be required to be sprinkled. The one area of the Fire Protection Code which no agreement was reached on is the issue of fire flow and water availability for the structures and so forth. There's no hydrant there. There's no City water out that far. The proposed change in use that generated this issue doesn't create, at least in my view, any additional fire hazards because there's not additional cutting, there's not additional welding. The only additional issue would be where these recreational vehicles how they would be parked and the possibility of fire spreading from one to the other, but as far as because he's changing his use to include sales, if he sells so many a year, he has to have a dealer's license, and that's what triggered this whole thing. There's a risk out there with a hydrant, but the risk is probably not any greater than what's there today by agreeing to this use. The other issue is whether he should be required to dedicate a portion of the frontage for future expansion of Franklin Road and Meridian City council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 9 where the landscaping strip, the planting strip in front should be located. The Planning and zoning Commission focused on the fire issue, and I don't believe they really addressed these other issues much because they didn't get to those issues because of the fire protection issue. Corrie: Is the applicant here this evening? Dugan: Mayor, members of the council, my name is Matt Dugan. I'm the President of Maple Grove RV at 2490 West Franklin Road. I have no problem putting up a fire wall if that would suffice the Building Department. I have checked into a dry chemical system, and 1 have been assured by Idaho Fire and Safety that there is a large enough system to chemical spray the building. Now if we have to have a wall up in there and the chemical system, then 1 would just prefer the wall. But I think the size of our building, only 500 square feet larger than the required size of 3,000 square feet. The issue with the 35 -foot setback, they want to have us up front is that we're now not on the 2020 plan for Franklin Road. So which I believe Shari was telling me is that you guys wanted the additional buffer zone that when Franklin Road is widened, that our 35 -foot setback be on top of that. Well, what it's doing is it's taking 45 feet of my property that's not even on the 2020 plan. So we haven't had any development of this property at all in 20 years, so when am I going to have a road widened in front of me; am I not going to be able to use my land for another 20 years is what my issue is. The other thing about safety and like Mr. Nichols said, we're not changing any use. We've been doing this and it has been going on in the building since 1991. But it's completely bare all the way around us. There's well over 100 acres at least around us that is no — causes no fire danger to anybody because it's all agricultural even though it is zoned light industrial. That's basically what I have. I really wasn't prepared with anything to come here tonight. I didn't know I was on the agenda. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, perhaps we should table this until June 5t" where the applicant can have a chance to respond to the conditions that staff has put and staff has some opportunity to work with Mr. Dugan on that. Dugan: I have no problem with the issue of the fire wall if that's what the issue is. If I have to put up a fire wall in the building, I have no problem with that. deWeerd: But with the landscaping and pavement or asphalting and those kinds of things, I thought you did have some comments on — Dugan: I'm just saying why do I have to give up my property that I own now. What is the requirement that the city has on me that they're going to take this on speculation that it's going to happen in 20 years or 5 years or 3 years when it's not on the 2020 plan? Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 10 deWeerd: That 2020 plan, though, does change. It's kind of a living, breathing document. With some of the developments that are going out to the west, it is very likely that that can change. So we hope that would change within that 20 -- year plan. Corrie: Would until June 6th give you some chance to talk with the staff and get that so you understand it and they can understand it and they bring it back and you make a decision as far as the Conditional Use Permit is concerned? It sounds like that is one of the requirements of ACHD is (inaudible) -- Dugan: ACHD is in your packet -- they required no improvements of this site at this time. Corrie: Shari. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and council, l have talked to the staff person who wrote that report, and they were of the — they thought this had already been an approved use through the city, and it had never come before the city. This -- due to the fact that partly we don't have a business license — the business was just started without coming to the city to ask for any kind of occupancy or to meet any of the Ordinance requirements. Had Ada county Highway District realized that, they would have required the dedication of the right-of-way, they would have required sidewalk construction clear down on Black cat that the Zanders that had come in and wanted the — I don't know if you even saw that application, but they had asked in the county for permission to have a motor vehicle repair and were required to dedicate the right-of-way and were required to put in sidewalk on their property. This is directly from Ada County Highway District and maybe if we table that I can get a new report from them, but they were operating under a misunderstanding that this had been an approved use through the city and it was fully sanctioned by the city and that they were simply asking for the sales part of it. But that wasn't the case. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, l guess listening to the testimony at the last council meeting and a little bit of the history of this property and why it was annexed and how it was annexed, it makes more sense to me to be approaching this thing from a deannexation from the city. There's no advantage for you to be in the City at this point. That eliminates the paving and the landscaping and the road width requirements then all you have to do is deal with it at that point is the fire code issues, and you've been able to work with the one as far as sprinkling the building as far as putting a firewall in there. The only remaining issue that you'd have at that point would be getting a water supply, and that you could still continue to work on. It makes no sense to me to even be looking at this thing for keeping it in the City. I don't see why we're looking at that. We ought to be going the other direction. C {ff Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 11 Dugan: And I have no problem with what the council says, but I just want to say that 1 have been a Meridian resident for 30 years. I am a Meridian High School graduate. So I am very proud of this City. Stiles: Mr. Mayor, I just wanted to explain that should this property be deannexed, it would revert that back to the original zoning which would be a County rural transitional zone and would not permit this type of operation. Anderson: And then he would have to go to the County and apply for a permit for that type of operation? Stiles: Yes, probably a rezone or a Conditional Use Permit or something of that nature. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, I think that this point it would behoove us to allow Mr. Dugan and staff to talk about this, talk about their options and then come back and recommend a plan of attack. 1 would make a motion to continue this to June 6th. Bird: I'll second it. Corrie: Any further discussion? Anderson: Mr. Mayor, is that acceptable to the applicant? Dugan: Just a timeframe, I have been working on this for over a year and -a -half, and so -- I mean, what's two more weeks, but it is the peak of my season, and I am a very busy man. I mean, I will be more than gracious to abide to the Council. Bird: Mr. Mayor, you brought this in a year and -a -half ago to our staff? Dugan: I started a year and--a-half ago with Planning and zoning, yes, with my original application. Corrie: okay. I think we need some answers on the 6th. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: We'll get you some answers, and 1 guarantee you that by June 6th you go one way or the other here. Item 3. Tabled from May 2, 2000: FP 00-004 Request for Final Plat approval of 32 building lots and 5 other lots on 12.801 acres in an r Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2066 Page 12 R-4 zone for Tarawood Subdivision b Michelangelo Y g Investments, LLC 1 Frank Stoppello: Corrie: Okay, Item No. 3, tabled from May 2000 Y . Request for final plat approval of 32 building fats and 5 other lots on 12.801 acres in an R--4 zone for Tarawood Subdivision by Michelangelo Investments, LLC, Frank Stoppello. Staff, comments first? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, ifou'll remember, er, we had a little misunderstanding, I guess, that you could sa about the Y� common lot that would be located right in this area here. I believe that was the on • only real matter, we had a difference of opinion on that. I talked to Mr. Stoppello right pp g t before this meeting, Tom Kuntz, the Parks and Recreation Director and I walked out, went out there and walked this site. We think this would be a verydesirable place to have as part of our pathway system. We would like to ask Mr. Stoppello o to enter into some discus � pp Bions with us to see if that's a feasible alternative and whether maybe there could be some impact fee offsets in consideration for that. l would I don't have any problem with approvingthe plat that p except p at it be understood that this is not to be sold off to the adjacent property Yow Hers, and it is to be maintained as a common area unless the City approves something different. The first proposal was to either sell it off to theentle g man that purchased this property to the west or to sell it off to the individual lot owners that abut 1t to the east. And I believe there is a common lot here in Los Alamitos that' �t would tie in very well for a future pathway. This pathway would extend from virtually all the way from Overland Road near Locust Crave clear through to the g Ridenbaugh. It would work well with the pathway system. I just hate to lose that at opportunity to be able to work on something for thatathwa . Mr. Stoppello p Y pp o could answer any questions, I guess, if he has any disagreement in doingthat. Other than that we didn't have any problems with the plat. That seemed to be the only issue that was remaining on our side. Corrie: So the only issue is whether or not that'soin g g to be a pathway. He does not want to do that? Okay. Mr. Stoppello. Bowcutt: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council Mr. Sto ello' pp s asked me to came before you this evening on this issue of final plat since 1 • p was the person who did the original presentations beforeou . ouIf recall Y y there were multiple discussions on that little finger that we referred to when we processed and what could be done with it. The main concern that the Council had` with that was that it be properly maintained; that it not be a weed patch or an . p eye sore. It was �n the preliminary plat Findings that were ave . ado tedIt us the p g option, it stated the applicant shall maintain or deed Lot 1, Block 1. So if it went with` Lot 3 which ch is the lot that adjoins it to the south as saygarden area because ' g se I believe that is approximately 60 feet wide, then the Council would accept that. The bi , p g issue was that it just not sit there unmaintained. If its a common lot n the 1 Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 13 development, it's highly unlikely that these residents will maintain it because they don't have access to it. It's blocked back there and isolated. The only reason that it's part of the property was for access into the parcel via an easement that ran from Locust Grove. Mr. Stoppello is not opposed if he can work something out with the city, Parks Department and they believe that this is a portion of the pathway system that they would like to take on, he's willing to enter into discussions with them. If the Parks Department does not want to do that, an easement for pedestrian access along that would be acceptable. We want to be accommodating. We want to make sure that your pathway systems for future pathway construction are protected. Shari indicated that she thought there was a common lot due north of this finger in Los Alamitos. There is a common lot for the drain, but it is west of this. So this finger backs up to a single --family residential lot, and (inaudible) main concern (inaudible — walked away from the mic) existing drain and the existing easement for Nine Mile in order to put a future pathway. So we're really not sure if this piece in its entirety will be that valuable to the City, but obviously, an easement would help to expand the path. Do you have any questions? Anderson: Mr. Mayor, on your map there, what's that red diagonal area there? Bowcutt: The red is the drain. Anderson: And how much feet do we have — is this a common lot? Bowcutt: (inaudible) Anderson: So that' whole thing is filled up with drain? Is it piped or tiled? Bowcutt: It's open and it appears that they are (inaudible). Stoppello: The drain is 50 feet wide. Bowcutt: It appears Los Alamitos has allocated approximately 30 --some feet based on that assessor's map. Bird: Mr. Mayor— Bowcutt: However, we've allocated 50. Bird: Didn't that finger— isn't it 57 wide? Bowcutt: Yes, the finger part is 57.19. Bird: At the top 57.23. Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 14 Bowcutt: And we've allocated 50 feet for the drain. Stoppello: which Includes, if I may — (inaudible) My name is Frank Stopp ello, Mayor and members of the council. If I may point to the map and grab that microphone. III be very brief. where the future pathway is going to be is there's 10 feet here that's going to go down here. Here's where the only piping that's been allowed on the Nine Mile Drain took place. Immediately this opens to p p 30. Its very steep. A lot of water draining into it. Then it comes to 50 feet. This is a 50 -foot wide. I'm telling you that it's at least 15 feet deep, and the pathway . p Y for cleanout -- where they run their equipment runs right along this northern edge, g, and that's what is going to be if they ever agree the pathway. Now when you get here, this road continues right along here to a culvert that goes out to Locust Grove. I know Mr. Sutter owns this. I own nothing in here. I do -- when ou pull Y into this lot, you have all these backyards, and I'm sorry, but my best memory is that is also Los Alamitos. This is the drain. However, 1 would like tog et this approved. I told Shari before the meeting for something to work out where they could come off of this road if they cant get this road at the next development, if they come off this road and maybe put a five- or ten --foot path along , herethey're Y still going to have to get back into Sutter's property into the Nine Mile Drain. I think the question at the last meeting, Mrs. deWeerd, if in fact there had been discussions at P & Z, we have the minutes. You were very active in them. I of . g up and said my intent is to sell this to the adjoining property owners or with Lot 3. That's why it says 2.20 in the Findings maintained or deeded. I think it says Y deeded. The idea was you were very insistent, you, ma'am, that this not be a weed patch while the developer owned it. That he had to maintain it. But the idea was to deed it away. But I'm willing to cooperate with Shari if there's a way to — I'd like her to prove tonight and I will give my word that I'll meet with Shari and the Parks Department, we'll go out there, this is my road here, we can drive right along it and come from Locust Grove. You said you had trouble looking over the fence. We can walk right out there. if something can be worked out on my word to the council, maybe we can dedicate this along here as an alternate easement if you can't get this or whatever, but I'd be willing to do that. I would like to get it approved; I've been right exactly at a year on this if I could. I'll answer any other questions. Corrie: Questions, Council? r Anderson: I don't have any questions, I just have a comment. This thingjust � keeps going back and forth. Our staff tells us that thatropertY iece of would p propertymake a good pathway, you guys keep telling us that it wouldn't and itg oes nowhere. Somewhere you guys have got to come to an agreement. You just cant keep coming before us telling us it wont work, it will work. All we've asked you to do is get together in between Council meetings and work this out, and you . keep coming back to the Council meetings telling us you haven'totten together g g and worked this out. I would love to approve your project, but with this Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 15 outstanding piece of property, I don't know where it's going, and it's not that I don't t trust your word, but to have a document and have something in agreement before we approve this, I'll feel a lot more comfortable doing that than to go out there tomorrow after we approve this tonight and all of a sudden nothing works out. There is no agreement. we're left with something that goes nowhere. Stoppello: This was approved, sir, exactly the way I said it. Maintained — applicant shall maintain or deed Lot 1, Block 1. Now, that's right there. That's what you had a condition on last time. Nobody had a copy of the Findings. I have never agreed prior to that time to try to helpout. I don't think it'll help it p because you need to continue down the Nine Mile Drain(inaudible)down. r this road and down into Los Alamitos. This is not going to help you.(inaudible)� � pY easement over on that land, a pedestrian path. I'm doing that tonight. I was asked to tonight. But I have followed everything you said in therelimina lat. I'm not changing anything. p rY p Bowcutt: Councilman Anderson, I'm sorry that we've burdened you with this . y this evening. May I make a suggestion? obviously you have set forth the conditions of approval in which this final plat is approved. Let's i just add a condition ton of approval stating that Mr. Stoppello shall grant an easement to the City for pedestrian access if staff determines that it is warranted and could be utilized by a park system or trail system. Something to that effect. Stoppello: I have no problem with that. Bowcutt: Therefore it is in writing. we would not be opposed to that. Stiles: That sounds great. That would work fine. Stoppello: I was just asked that before the meeting g and I agreed to it. Corrie: okay, Council, you can either approve or reject the final plat a 1 p t this pont. Do you want to approve it with conditions? You can do that. orou y can resect the final plat. I'll entertain a motion to do something and then we can accept o r reject it. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the finallat for '12.66'1 acres Cres with 32 building lots and 5 other lots in an R-4 and R -T zone for Tarawood Subdivision by Michelangelo Investments with the condition added for staff and developer to determine the usage of Lot 1. Anderson: Second. Corrie: okay. Motion is made and seconded to approve the request for fin pp q al plat on the Tarawood Subdivision with the added condition of staff and developer Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 16 working out the easement on Lot 1, Block 1. Any further discussion? Roll -call vote. Roll -call.- deWeerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye Item 4. Tabled from May 2, 2000: FP 00-007 Request for Final Plat approval of 102 lots and 14 other lots on 31.94 acres in an R-4 zone by Projects West, Inc., for English Gardens Subdivision: Corrie: Item No. 4 is tabled from May 2, 2000, request for final plat approval of 102 lots and 14 other lots on 31.94 acres in an R-4 zone by Projects Voest, Inc., for English Gardens Subdivision. There has been a request from staff to table that until June the 6th. Any other questions of Council? I'll entertain a motion on Item No. 4 to be tabled until June 6th. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we table No. 4, FP 00-007 *** End of Side 2 *** Bird: --- request for final plat approval of English Gardens Subdivision until 616/00. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to table Item No. 4, request for final plat approval, FP 00-007, until June 6th meeting on English Gardens Subdivision. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 5. Continued Public Hearing from April 18, 2000: CUP 00-006 Request for a conditional Use Permit for existing car dealership (2 buildings) on front four acres and proposed 72,000 s.f. Fairview Mini -Storage on the back four acres -- 1005 East Fairview Avenue: Corrie: Item No. 5 is a continued public hearing from April 18, 2000, CUP 00- 006, request for a Conditional Use Permit for existing car dealershipbuildin 2 buildings) g) on front four acres and proposed 72,000 s.f. Fairview Mini Storage on the back four acres, 1005 East Fairview Avenue. I will continue the public hearing and I think that one is maybe to be continued, but I'll have staff comments first. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, it is to my understanding that we need to contact John Moody at L.B. Industries and ask him what p they're Ian is to continue since they have asked for an indefinite deferral. Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2660 Page 17 Corrie: is there anyone here from the public outside the applicant? Is the applicant here tonight? Is there anyone from the public that wants to testify on this public hearing? deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, 1 move that we continue the public hearing for the CUP 66--666 for a CUP by Fairview Mini Storage to June 6th. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to continue the public hearing until June 6th on the CUP 606-606, Fairview Mini . Storag eAn further discussion? Any Anderson: Mr. Mayor, just a point of order. What's the longest time we can continue a public hearing? Is it 30 days? Nichols: Council and Mayor, where the applicant requests the extension of a continuance, they've waived any statutory requirement on the timeframe, and I'm not real clear on how long you can string it along, but particularly where they've asked for it, it's a waiver. So they can't claim any failure to act within a specific time. Anderson: I guess — you were asking to the 6th? I'm thinking we should go at least a month. They're asking for an indefinite time period. deWeerd: We did it to that date certain so that staff could contact them and get a definite date. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, I think it's important to either — I mean if this issue is dead, then they need to say so and come back and do it again. If it's not dead, then they need to tell us when they're going to have it done. An indefinite extension on indefinite continuance just doesn't work for your purposes at least in my opinion. So that's why 1 think it sounds like that's what Ms. Stiles is going to do is get — it's (inaudible) date, basically. They need to do something with it. Corrie: Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion to table this until June 6#h say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 6. Public Hearing: VAR 00-008 Request for parking variance — reduction in required parking spaces for Generations Park Plaza II by Gary Benoit — at East Vt Street and East Pine Avenue: Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 18 Corrie: Item No. 6 is aublic hearing. g A request for a parking variance reduction in required parkin aces far � ' g s St Street and East Pin p Generations Park Plaza ! I b Ga Benoit at East � y � Pine Avenue. At this time I'll open theublic hearing and invite the staff comments first. p Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, did you e . y get staff comments on this? ! didn't have them in my packet. I just wanted to make sure that you had those. Corrie: No. Don't see an l have Y one from Nampa Meridian. !dont have anything in my packet. Stiles: 1'11 see if 1 can remember what ! wrote. This would be dealing with only the variance part of thea application. You pp u will be seeing the Conditional Use Permit portion of the application at a later date. They are proposing 11,000+ s.f. new building to replace the Stan's Mowers know . 1 n as the old Hitchcock Building. don't know if they have some ^1 guess the r g , y can address if they have some revisions to the plan, but what they reosin taking ra adjacent p p g is ing this lot which is t to the City parking lot and makingit the T parking for a new building. They want to raise the existing buildings g g there and construct a new building..They re proposing 19 parking spaces. The City ordinance would require 45 parking spaces for the square q q footage of the building they'reproposing. Th were some issues no ere none that have been submitted officially that as far changing directions y as maybe g g of some of the parking lots, changing the . alley. The g g direction of the Y y have submitted a request to Ada Count ' Y Highway District for vacation of this portion of the alley, and we did et an art � g application today in our department ment to follow Meridians process for vacatin that alley. ey. 1 had a hard time preparing a recommendation on this. There are thought a lot of different schools of ought when it comes to parkin areas in the downtown wntown core. An abundance of parking can lead to people depending p g more on their cars. It is the surface parking lots are also a waste of space in p some cases and result in lower densities in the downtown • So there are — there is also the site where people in the area are complainingabout no � • p parking availability. Paisano's across the street, they did get a variance from the off-street parking requirements. You dust approved tonight the variance for this others ace that tis also awned by the same group here known as Generations Plaza 1 the old Holloway Building, and they have no parking for that site. It will take a concerted effort on the part of the applicant to find tenants that work well with this building and will rely on the pedestrian -oriented clientele to come to the building. They have also submitted, l hope you have in your packets, the have ' . y submitted a drawing showing where there is existing parking. Granted a lot of it i ' .. s private parking, but there is some availability of other areas to park. The existing . g City parking lot across the street here on Broadway is severely under-utilized. .. Y ed. They had discussed possibly requiring the employees of the building to park in that area and walk down to their building because the parkin will be a • g problem. You will be seeing the actual Conditional Use Permit on thisro'ect that p � will show all of the elevations of Meridian city Council Meeting May '16, 2000 Page 19 the proposed building and other design details at a later date. Today we're working on the variance. As far as this, the change in direction I mentioned, they had discussed possibly making this the opposite direction and re -doing the striping on the city parking lots, but this would be the exit out because Ada County Highway District had made their determination — it has been that they can only have a right -in and a right -out the way this is configured now just because of the location and the distance from the intersection. So my comment on that was if they did propose to change the direction of the City parking lot or changed or effected any of the parking along this alley that should be the applicant's responsibility to pay for those changes that would be required. But in the case of the city parking lot, there would be some curbing changes, there would be some striping changes. 1 don't know if it would affect the landscaping or not, but — That's what I remember that I wrote. I don't have that in my file. The applicant can address his issues with the variance application. That's all I have. Corrie: Is the applicant here this evening? okay. Give the applicant five minutes. Cole: Good evening, Mayor and Council. I'll try to keep this brief. You've seen this project before. This is one of two buildings that surrounds Generations Park. This is the second one. We feel that in order for this project to be viable and be feasible that we would suggest reducing parking requirements that currently exist for this project. We feel that this project is going to be a nice amenity for the City of Meridian and as designed and as proposed that it's going to be beneficial for the residents of the downtown business district. Corrie: Are there any questions that you can answer about this parking, striping, changing and if they do eventually go to that? Cole: We're working with ACH D right now to investigate right now the — they recommended the restriping in order for the entrance, the main entrance, to be located farther away from that intersection. We have no problem with that developer restriping or what's necessary to accommodate that. Bird: Mr. Mayor, and you're talking about the City lot at the same time, correct? Corrie: Any further discussion, Council, at this time? okay. Thank you. is there anyone else from the public that would like to -- in favor of the variance? okay. Anyone else from the public against the variance? okay. Name and address, please. Wishney: Mr. Mayor and Council, my name is Susan Wishney, I work for Northwest Property Management. My firm manages a parcel of --- project located on 2nd and Pine owned by Lloyd and Betty Gerber. This is a mixed use structure. The ground level is commercial tenants. Upstairs are apartments. our project Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 20 provides ample parking for our residents with commercial and residential tenants; however, there is not always sufficient parking on-site for the patrons and guests of my clients or my tenants. My tenants have stated to me on numerous occasions that there is a diirth (sic) of parking on the street surrounding this area. It is absorbed by surrounding businesses and residences. If this reduction in parking application were approved, it would probably already exacerbate the shortage of parking that exists in this area. This is a transitional area. I think some of it is moving more towards commercial, and it's going to impact my client's project. He is opposed to this application on that basis. If, however, the streets surrounding this area were to receive posting limiting parking to one or two hours, my client would not oppose the application for reduction in parking. Thank you. Corrie: Thank you. Anyone else in the public like to issue testimony in this request for a variance? Okay. Hearing none, Council, any questions of staff or the applicant? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Okay. If there is no more testimony, then I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Anderson: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and seconded to close the public hearing on Item No. VAR 00-008, Item No. 6. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Staff. Excuse me, Council, comments? Anderson: Mr. Mayor, 1 guess just a general comment would be we listened to a presentation two weeks ago about this project and the parking, and this is nothing but a bare lot right now where we're talking about building the parking. If they were to meet our parking requirements, all they would be building would be a parking lot for the City of Meridian which would be nice, but we're actually trying to get some business and some things going in the downtown area, and these projects are the start of what we feel will help to revitalize our downtown area. Parking is an issue in the downtown area, and I know that Council is going to have to address that further down the road, and we'll have to come up with some additional solutions to that, but I would make a motion tonight in favor of granting this variance for Generations Park Plaza No. 2. Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 21 Bird: Second. Corrie: Okay, motion's made and seconded to approve the request for parking variance on the Generations Plaza No. 2 by Gary Voigt. Any further discussion? Anderson: I'd like to add to instruct the counsel tvare re Findings of Fact for p p g that. Bird: I'll second that. Corrie: Just for the public's information, we do have a committee, the Downtown Redevelopment Committee that's going to be looking into the parking downtown and also on new businesses and some of the Old Town areas to revitalize the downtown areas. This will be one of the things that they'll have to look at. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, I have one for the City attorney. If they construct their own parking lot, can we restrict the amount of time someone can park there? I know in our city lot we have a two-hour limit enforced on it. I don't know who enforces it, but they're supposed to. Corrie: It's enforced. Nichols: councilwoman deWeerd, Mayor, members of the council, the reason for putting an hour restriction on the public lot is because if you don't, you have no way of keeping traffic moving through it; whereas, the private parking lot can be restricted to patrons of that particular business. So that's the — I mean, they have an interest in moving that -- those cars in and out of there. I'm not aware of a private parking lot where hour conditions have been imposed. It's more or less been allowed. If somebody wants to spend three hours looking through a craft store, then they can do so. deWeerd: Thank you. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, I do have one thing. For my own notes, I'm not sure that the applicant identified his name. At least I didn't get it. Corrie: Okay. I'll -- Cole: I apologize. Stan Cole, Cole Associates Architects, Boise, Idaho. 960 Broadway. Corrie: Thank you, Stan. Any further discussion? Hearing none, roll --call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll -call: deWeerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye �, ..... 1, Meridian City Council Meeting May 15, 2 000 Page 22 7. Public Hearing: Az 00-006 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for annexation and zoning of 12.73 acres from R -T to L -O and R-15 zones - northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: 8. Public Hearing: PP 00-005 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for Preliminary Plat for 12.73 acres with 10 building lots and 2 other lots on 12.73 acres in proposed L -O and R-15 - northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: 9. Public Hearing: CUP 00-014 Request by Vicki Welker 1 Gold River Companies, Inc. for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for Conditional Use Permit for a 128 -unit apartment complex, townhouses and office on 12.73 acres in proposed L -O and R-15 zones-- northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road: Corrie: Okay. Item No. 7 is a public hearing. This is a request b Vicki Welker, q Y Gold River Companies, Inc., for a proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for annexation and zoning of 12-73 acres from R -T to L -O and R-18 zone; northeast corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road. At this time I'll open thep ublic hearing and have comments from staff first. Bird: Mr. Mayor, would it be improper to open all three of those at the same time? Corrie: If you'd like to, we can have them make comment on all three. Bird: Is that agreeable with you? Corrie: All right. I'm going to open the public hearing — change of order here. I'm going to open the public hearing on the request for the annexation and zoning, also for the preliminary plat and also for the request for conditional Use Permit on Valeri Heights Subdivision. So when you testify, ti on all three at one time if you, you can testify fY like. Your testimony will be for each one of those ifY ou so desire. So I'm going to open the public hearing on 7, 8 and g. Staff, comments. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, this is for the propertylocated on the northeast corner of Pine and Ten Mile. It is currently occupied by a home, a single-family home. I believe you save this application previously. Do you remember this? . a They have made some significant changes to the original plan. As far as the . g annexation and zoning, we did request a Development Agreement and ask that certain restrictions be placed in that development Agreement that wouldn't Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 23 permit some of the uses that they may come in with a Conditional Use Permit such as a convenience store or a bar. On the plat portion of it, this is what it currently looks like. on the plat, on the recommendations from P & z on Page 2, Item 6, at the top of the page, it says subject property is within the City limits of the City of Meridian. It hasn't been annexed yet, so it is not within the city limits. We would also like on the plat portion of it to add another condition regarding the six feet of landscape right-of-way. There would be six feet beyond where the roadway improvements would be. We would like them to enter into a License Agreement with Ada County Highway District and submit a copy of their agreement prior to any certificates of occupancy. There's also a letter from Terry Little. Did you get that in your packets? Corrie: Yes. I did. Dated May 15h'- Stiles: Regarding the signalization at Pine and Ten Mile? If that is going to be your recommendation and a condition of your approval, we'd like you to specify the funding and the timing of that signal installation as part of the approval, should this project be approved, so that we're not having problems with it later. And on the Conditional Use Permit recommendation, Item 1.10 on Page 3, where it discusses the requirement for a storage area, this is an R-15 zone requirement that they would have to have -- that they're asked to have a storage area for RV, boats, campers, whatever as part of this planned development. That Item 1.10 would need to be omitted if the Council deems that appropriate. There's — this shows the existing field there. The palm (sic), out buildings. This is the proposed plan. They're showing these as apartments here. They would have some garages along the northern boundary and some along the outside perimeter. This area here is where they're proposing the office area with the associated parking. Here on Pine, they would have their clubhouse and pool. They'd have a fountain feature in the middle. I'll go through — they did submit somemore planned use. This was the first prospective they had given of the office area, and they had since come up with some new plans; this was the garages; four-plex; this would be the 16 -unit complex; this is their proposed entry sign; this is the proposed clubhouse; this is I guess commercial sign that I don't know if each one of these would be an individual tenant or there aren't any i dimensions on it, so its hard to tell what exactly that one s; this is showing their proposed landscaping. I do note that they are showing this -- I guess this is the sidewalk. They're proposing to tile the drain here. It's a safety hazard at this time; another site rendering; another four-plex; this would show the pond area that would be in the center of the apartment complex showing a gazebo. That's all I had as far as pictures. Do you have any questions of me? Corrie: Any questions at this time? Okay. Thank you. Any other staff comments? okay. I'd invite the developer's representative to come up and see what you do in five minutes. Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 24 Bailey: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. My name is David Bailey. My address is 6417 Santa Cruz Drive, Boise. I'm representing Vicki Welker, Gold River Companies, for the Valeri Heights planned development. As Ms. Stiles had related, we had submitted this previously, and we think that the outcome of the resubmittal of this is not the same application as a new application for the same property, but we think the outcome is really made some significant improvements to the project. The previous submittal had 164 units versus 128 units. Excuse me, 136 units on this plan. There was an issue with tandem parking. on the previous application, it had parking spaces that were behind the garages that were controversial. The open space wasn't nearly as well arranged, I think, as we're showing in this plan, and the buildings were spread throughout the site making for a variety of problems. The buildings around the perimeter of the project which provided more impact on the neighbors to the project. There were some questions about the circulation in that plan, and that plan also required some significant grading on the site in order to make it feasible to make it work. We think we've corrected all those problems, and we've tried to take into account, going over the minutes from those hearings in the meetings that we had had, and try to take those into account as revision of this plan. We're currently showing 128 apartment buildings, and there's actually 8 16 -unit apartment buildings there. In between each building there's a courtyard area that would be landscaped, and there's significant landscaping around the site as well. Back up real quickly. We have also with me tonight Scott Harrison, the designer for the project, worked on the buildings. We have Pat Dobie who is our traffic engineer for the project, and Michael Marceeze who is the property manager consultant for the project. The units we're proposing would be between 866 and 1300 s.f. with one -bedroom, two-bedroom and three-bedroom units. We are proposing to construct a tot -lot, the water amenity that we're showing there, and we do - I think you can catch it in the landscape plan, there was a question from Planning and Zoning about making sure that that's not a safety hazard and have shrubbery around that and a fence around that - portion of that, stones around a portion of that to try to keep small children around that. It's also located - (inaudible) seen fairly easily from a lot of directions on the site. Ground -floor units would meet ADA requirements and Fair Housing requirements, and that applies to the townhouse units also. There are eight of those townhouse units. Clubhouse with pool and a basketball court on the southerly end of the project as well. We're providing 364 parking spaces. Minimum required is two, and the Council, per the Planned Development Ordinance, could require up to 2.33 per unit. We're at 2.375. We think we're well over that. We do have units that are set out to be garaged and open- spaces for handicapped parking that we feel meets the handicapped parkin -g. requirements. 166 of the parking spaces are garaged, those 16 -foot wide 0;;ft-ra-g- es with a door on them, not carports. We had delineated our walkways in our project with the stamped concrete, and you can see the dark spots there, to help with the traffic - pedestrian circulation on the site, and hopefully help the safety issues in that area. We're proposing a six --foot perimeter fence which would go six feet along the north and east boundaries Meridian City Council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 25 along the project. There would be berms along the west and southerly portion of the project. Landscaping behind the garages -- • g g the goal was to provide as much of a buffer as possible to thero ort p p y so the north and for what may be constructed to the eastof this is. It's currently vacant there and provide those garages with landscaping behind them that would be maintained. There would be a fence, 10 feet of landscaping that would be professionally ' then theP anally maintained, and garage units. Actually, to the northerly point of the apartment ' taxi p est building there, it's approximately mately 85 feet from the property line beforeou're a Y even to an apartment building, and that's at a two-story level. So it'd be almostst 100 feet from the property line to the three-story level of a building. The eight ght townhouses would be 1, s.. buildings, and there are two -garages g ages far each unit on that. O300f n the southwesterly corner we have 26,000 s.f. office space, and its split into three sections with someatio areas in the e middle. There were some suggestions that we could -- it, d be best to have a view into the project rather than the whale back of the building. We'd like . g to break that up some and have some windows in the rear there. Our covenants as' we ve submitted are prohibiting any signage on the back of the building. The sign that we were showing on the overhead here — l don't know the exact size, but its the Ci ordinance requirements,' ' � � and its a fairly compact sized sign. In each spots it wouldindividualg of those p be for the advertising. That and then the w' g on the front, say on endow or the door of the building, would be the o . g my other advertising that would be allowed for the office uses or commercial i cial uses. l m going to move ahead here. One of the biggest issues associated with this project and with the area in general is the traffic associated with this. We appreciated the letter we got from ACHD recently that discussed some of those issues. v11e really feel that this is the right place. Your Comprehensive p e Plan shows this as planned development area, mixed residential or mixed development. We think that this provides a good suitability for that. COMPASS h . . as supported our position on that, and the intersection of Ten Mile and Pine, Mile being an arterial street which at some point in the future we'll have conn • connections to either a rail system or an interchange to the freeway, and 1 think it's scheduled in the fail in your plan for improvement.. l don't know that it's funded et, but it's scheduled las f Y led in the five-year p or the widening of Ten Mile Road. The intersection of Pine and Ten Mile right now is the problem. We've heard a lot ofa testimony on that. We've heard from people on those issues. We've tried to do everything that we can within the scope of this el project to improve that, and we reallyfeel ' that this project would improve the situation at that intersection and not degrade • g de the situation at that intersection. We'd be willing to, as the Highway District suggested, to do the engineering, put up the traffic signs, the stop signs far the project, offered to • g p 1 ct, and we have do the engineering work and install a traffic signal Mlle g at that Pine and Ten Road. As far as the fundis that the developer g on � aper is expecting to fund the engineering and construction of that and the Highway Di g Y strict would supply parts for the traffic signals. That's what he was talking about in his letter that its not funded in their five-year plan, so the 't ' Y canprovide the money to pay for those improvements, but we could provide those improvements and da abetter deal on Meridian City Council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 25 getting the parts for that which they can re -use when they do the improvements and benefit the public in advance. We are tiling the drain at the corner as Ms. Stiles printed out, and we intend to put in a right -turn lane and the left --turn lane at that intersection so that we can provide a better flow of traffic to that area. The stub streets to the project to the north, this is something that the Highway District wants and the city wants to provide the stub streets. The functionality of this project is not affected either way by providing those. It does provide a traffic route from this project into this neighborhood to the north which we really prefer not to have, but i think the neighbors to the north would also prefer not to have that. Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot that we can do to that consideration that it's the policy of the City and of the Highway District to provide those interconnections between — what we have done is made the traffic circulation within the apartment complex to be as good as possible for providing the traffic flow through the apartment complex while discouraging cut -through traffic and discouraging traffic that would go to the north out of this project. I believe that's all I have unless you have any questions for me. Corrie: I have nothing. Did you say it was — Bailey: Pat Dobie who is the traffic engineer, Scott Harrison who is theJro'ect p designer, and Michael Marceeze who is the property manager consultant. Corrie: They've got 10 minutes. Bailey: Thank you. Dobie: Mr. Mayor, membersof the Council, my name is Pat Dobie, M address Y is 777 Hotstone Drive in Boise. I prepared a traffic impact study project for this 'ect J last August. That study was reviewed by ACHD. As a result of their review and subsequent meetings with the Planning and Zoning commission, there was an issue raised about high --school traffic. I went back in December and collected additional traffic counts and reviewed that with the Highway District evaluating the conditions with the school in session. As (inaudible) stands, the Highway � Y District has approved the project subject to a requirement that they construct a left -turn lane on the Pine Street approach and a left --turn lane on both approaches on Ten Mile Road. At the present time, the intersection is a little rough out there. It doesn't have a lot of pavement width; it has some fair) poorly Y defined geometry, and it has that drain ditch to contend with. The Highway g Y Districts conclusion was with the projected traffic Y volumes, out through the year � 2000, 2005, in COMPASS model, and even looking out into the year 2020, with an improved section on Ten Mile Road and with the new freeway interchange out on the interstate, there would be adequate capacity at this intersection to accommodate the site -generated traffic with these land improvements provided that the road was improved to at least a three -lane section. in Terry Little's letter, he mentioned that the intersection is approaching the (inaudible) for an all -way Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 27 stop condition. Well, based upon comments that were made at the Planning and Zoning commission meeting, both from the public and the members of the Commission, the developer proposed to put in a signal at their expense. Now, because these are system roads, Ada County Highway District normally provides the materials for the signal which is about a third of the cost. This is a considerable expense associated with installing the signal, and I think that improvement gathered with the land widenings and the sidewalks will adequately mitigate the traffic impacts from full development of this project. In addition (inaudible) pedestrian crossing so that school children and pedestrians within the area have the safe crossing on Ten Mile Road. once the signal is installed, it will provide all of the capacity that's needed to accommodate essentially any level of traffic at that location. I know the neighbors are concerned about the traffic, and I just wanted to express to you that this is an extraordinary level of improvements that have been required of this — being proposed by this development, and I think it adequately addresses the needs of this location. If you have any questions or if comments come up from the public, I'd be happy to address them. Corrie: You'll have a chance after the public gets through to answer the questions that come up. Dobie: Thank you. Corrie: Do you have another one? Harrison: members of the Council, my name is Scott Harrison, Project Designer on this project. I reside at 3595 Wasworth Drive, Boise, Idaho. Most of what I wanted to talk about is in the staff comments from the last Planning and Zoning meeting regarding materials, construction, things like that, regarding this project. We've tried to incorporate into this project the items that will make it a good project as far as construction standards and things like that. So I'm going to briefly go over a few of those items. Again, it's (inaudible) construction on the mixed residential and apartment side with separation of walls. we'll have smoke detection and sprinkler — fully sprinklered systems. We will meet ADA and Fair Housing requirements at all entrances. Turning radii within the structure itself within kitchens and bathrooms, et cetera, to meet those requirements. Any stairs that do require ramps will have ramps on the exterior entrances on the building. It'll be basic 2x5 construction, slab on grade. our materials that we will use are pretty consistent with what you would normally see around Boise. This is the roofing. Actual shingle siding, you know, the preferred selection right now is masonite, but we have an option there to do vinyl because vinyl's come a long way in the past few years. The windows, we have selected white vinyl, single - hung with an architectural and low -e coating for energy conservation. All the fascia and soffett, again, those will be masonite with -- the alternate being textured aluminum soffetts with fascia panels. I do have an additional item that I mss,. _. .... r � Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 28 would like to give to you to pass around. (inaudible — walked away from mic). That shows some of the things we're planning as far as not only landscaping but some of the exterior venire (inaudible) add some brick to add with a bit of change, a little bit of distinction on the size of the buildings. We didn't have that before, the last time we presented this to the city Council. Dave was able to cover most of the chief issues with regard to the site. Architecturally, as far as this project goes, it hasn't been much of a concern, much of an issue. Most of the issues have been regarding traffic, parking and things like that. If you do have any questions, thought, I'd like to entertain them and open it up to that right now. Corrie; None at this time. Thank you. Marceeze: Mr. Mayor, members of the council, my name is Michael Marceeze. I'm a property manager and here to address any issues that might result — be questioned about the property management of the proposed site. I'm the owner of Summit Real Estate Services. I've been in the business since 1980 and managed over 10,000 units in my career. one of the properties that I currently manage is Aspen Hills Apartments. It's 120 units up on Meridian Road. I have with me, if necessary, the manager of Aspen Hills who would be pleased to testify that there is definitely demand for more apartments in the area. She maintains a waiting list almost year -around. Based on our review of the proposed site, we feel that this is a luxury property which is in demand and well developed and organized in terms of units and amenities and adequate parking. In fact, there's an abundance of garaged parking there that would reduce crime and certain traffic congestion on the property. Part of our development service or our service to developers is to engage local law enforcement in reviewing pian design. There's a program called CPTED which stands for crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, and we have contacted that department within law enforcement, and they've reviewed the plans and given us some suggestions in favor of review which I am happy to share with you. As a professional property manager since 1980, we employ various standards to maintain a high quality of environment including qualifying residents through screening out of credit and criminal background and evictions and so on. We' establish rules and regulations to control noise and aesthetics of a property, guests, overcrowding and so on. And we're involved with risk management between our managers for emergencies and to be involved with the community in the areas of neighborhood watch. There's a program called Mufti= -family Crime Free Program which we're involved in. So just to summarize here-, I'm here to answer any questions that might come up regarding the management of the property. There is an art and science to managing properties well, maintain a quality environment and if this project's approved, we will be engaged to implement that kind of management. Thank you very much. t. Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 29 Corrie: Mr. Bailey, is that all that you had? okay. Is there anyone from the public now that wants to issue testimony in favor of this project? Fuller: Mr. Mayor, council members, my name is Dave Fuller. I've been down here before a couple of times when this project came up before. I'm currently the owner and occupant of the home which is a small farm at this location right now. 1 grew up here most all my life in Meridian. Graduated right down the street at the high school and thought this would be a nice place to live all my life right there on Pine Avenue. what happened is that growth came, and I tried to, like my neighbors, suppress the growth just a little bit to no avail. what you can do is you can try to fight it, you can try to help organize it, or you can just face the facts and let's do something good for the City. I had other developers approach me on this piece of land, and most of them wanted to go just R-4 with it, but because it's the corner and because I believe it has more potential, and I want to leave some kind of a legacy of my land here, that I wanted to make sure that some developer put in some kind of services, and the services I'm talking about are the office buildings. But in the office building services, not very many people want a real fancy home right back behind an office building. So what comes next? The most logical thing is to put some apartments or multiple -family type, higher -density, in behind that apartments (inaudible) provide services. So I'm here tonight to just tell you that I'm one of you and 1 support the project. we can flip back through the pictures, but it looks awful good to me. I can drive back by that in a few years and say, hey. 1 used to own that piece of ground, and look what that --- *** End of side 2 *** Corrie: Is there anyone else to testify in support? okay. Now, first one that gets up, I'll give you five minutes and then everybody pay real close attention because if you agree, and I'm going to ask for a show of hands if you agree, and then we'll take that down as part of the public testimony. If anybody else has anything else they want to add to that, then we'll limit that to three to five minutes depending on how many we have. who would like to be first? Atkinson: okay. Totally unprepared to do this. Mayor Corrie, council members, I'm Erma Calhoun Atkinson. Like Mr. Fuller, I was born in Meridian, spent 30 of my 40 years here and returned to Meridian to raise my family. I live at 1124 North Lightning. We would be on the north side of the fence in Thunder Creek. Our concerns focus on traffic safety, pedestrian safety, compatibility with the surrounding area. You have on my rather lengthy three-page letter dated May 12th in your packet, I believe. Regarding traffic safety, in some was I feel real) y v y good right now because last fall when I was here, we were being told there was no traffic problem at that intersection, and look at hove far we've come. So I'm trying to refrain anything for tonight, but that 1 think is a positive because the people are taking the traffic issue seriously. That's great. Actually, 1 have not seen the letter from ACH D, although I guess l did receive a copy. I haven't Meridian city Council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 30 gotten it yet. I understand that can be a good thing. Regarding the pedestrian safety, even if you put in a traffic signal by the developer, and that would be great to have a little walk and don't walk lights, but there's no where to go there. Valeri Heights will be an island with sidewalks that lead nowhere. If a selling point is that they're within walking distance of a park and schools and shopping, well, technically, yes, but you'll be walking down the street. Sidewalks don't connect you anywhere at this point in time. That to me is a traffic accident waiting to happen, and I don't think that's responsible City planning to approve that project knowing that that's going to happen. Yes, I've seen the owner's 21 year-old daughter roller-blading down the middle of Ten Mile. What can I say? If you add 500 more people to that corner, you'll see other people also on the road because there are no sidewalks. Trying to be brief here. As noted in my letter, this doesn't exactly totally fit with the Comprehensive Plan we're currently operating under. on Page 73, 5.2U, it says new development should enhance rather than detract from the visual quality of its surroundings. As you know, Valeri Heights is a three-story apartment complex. I think my seven year-old says it best when he looks out the window and says, "Mom, that thing's going to look weird out there." We are a subdivision of predominantly one -level homes. There may be one or two that have a bonus room or something, but we're one -level homes. This doesn't blend. It's surrounded on three sides at this point by rural transition land. It's surrounded on the north side by our single-family subdivision. It doesn't blend for three stories. We here how wonderful Aspen Hills is, and 1 think that's great. I've driven around there. The main difference is Aspen Hills does not border on an existing neighborhood, on an existing subdivision. It's bordered by commercial between Aspen Hills and Meridian Road. It's bordered on the north and east side by fields, and it's bordered on the south by James court Apartments which are two-story. It wasn't inflicted on an existing neighborhood. It's also connected to shopping and other services by sidewalks. Again, Valeri Heights is connected to nowhere by its sidewalks. We believe that the residents living around this property would look favorably on a proposed development which includes two-story apartments. I mean, certainly the townhouses are one level and great, but I think we could tolerate a two-story development. Better buffering; those plans look great, but you're seeing mature landscaping where the real tree is going to be this tall. Ideally, with Mr. Bailey, we would like self- containment, elfcontainment, but we understand that may not be possible, and we do appreciate the efforts that they've made. We need the traffic signal at Ten Mile and Pine if anything goes in here and any other recommendations that are made by ACHD would be helpful. So at this point in time, we respectfully request that you deny the annexation and zoning and preliminary plat request. Corrie: okay. Thank you. okay. So far what she said, how many agree with that so far? Twenty-seven. I've got 27. So put that in the record that 27 agrees. Atkinson: Mayor Corrie, I forgot (inaudible). Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 3'1 Corrie: They can bring it up if they like. Is there anyone else that has some other ideas that wasn't — yes, sir. Lambert: My name is Rick Lambert. I live at 3220 Vilest Park Creek Drive on the corner of Ten Mile and Park Creek. I've prepared a letter here for you, and I didn't get it in to you on time, so that' s (inaudible) — one for each of you. one of my main concerns is zoning. The zoning that went past the Planning and Zoning Commission last month seemed to get railroaded through some how. This area here was zoned mixed residential in the '93 Plan, and medium residential in the Draft 2000 Plan. Existing homes on the site is residential. I do not see a need for an office space. I do not see a purpose for the office space. I do not understand how Planning and Zoning approved an office in an area in an area that's not zoned for offices. The second point I'd like to make is on traffic. Certainly everybody's recognized now that the developer needs to put in a traffic signal. If you are familiar with the area, you know that Pine Avenue extends to the west, and a traffic signal requires a four-way signal. I believe ACH D and the others have said that that will require a 399 -foot approach on the west side as well. So there's additional paving and other implications associated with traffic signals that need to be addressed. The last thing is public safety. I'm concerned with cut --through traffic. People that are familiar with the area that when Pine was closed earlier late last year, the high school kids were cutting through the subdivisions, and one went through some guy's yard into a pond and drove back out and tore up his yard. The high school kids, when they're stuck at this stop sign are going to cut through that area there. Whether it's through the area — it's difficult to see on this map because it looks like the road goes around this way. But there's also access that goes to the office area and ties into those other roads. Now, those kids are going to cut through that area. They're going to cut through the other subdivisions, and they're not going to wait at the stop signal. It's happened before and it'll happen again. The other thing with public safety is I don't know what the issues are with crime and with fire protection, but I believe that with this number of families in that area it adds a certain element, and if you look at Aspen Hills and James Court and what's going on in those areas, I think you'll see that they have a higher crime per square foot of area than we do in the surrounding subdivisions. So with that, what I would recommend is that the Council not approve this and that if they do approve it, if they make part of the conditional use that when they put in the subdivision they have to have the signal in place and the turnlanes as they've said. Corrie: Thank you. Vallee: My name is Chris Vallee and I live at 1167 North Gray Cloud. on North Gray Cloud Way is the row that abuts right up against the development there, and I can testify that it's just been mentioned before that when Pine was under construction that there were a lot of kids, high-school kids, driving through the neighborhood at high rates of speed, and that even continues today when Pine Meridian City council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 32 isn't under construction. Some feel that it's a very easy way to get through the neighborhood and out onto Pine Avenue and down to the high school. In my opinion, this would only enhance that just because of the traffic issues that exist today. If you notice in the 1998 plan, it was intended that cherry Lane all the way down to Pine, it was going to be a three -lane road. Based on the statistics of population and how much traffic there would be, that's what was estimated that was needed. Today, obviously, the population is much greater than what was anticipated under the '98 plan via traffic is much higher and it's stili only a two-lane road. Putting in that facility would also increase that traffic problem for pedestrians as well as others. So I would hope that based on this project, l mean, I understand, I think everybody here understands that there is going to be development there. 1 would hope that when development comes that it's going . g g to be in single-family units as opposed to apartment buildings adjacent with commercial facilities which as was mentioned before, this property is technically not in the city; it's out in the rural area. So I would hope that eventually when it comes to the point that that is developed, that it is developed with single-family homes that there is some area there where that we can have possibly have some common -area parks for the new subdivision that goes in and have a nice beautiful area for Meridian as opposed to some commercial areas out in the country. The other thing that I bring up is on my street, there is three or four houses that are for sale, and one of the houses that was occupied prior to us moving in last year at the end of the year, once this approved Planning and Zoning, they immediately put their house up on the market and they moved out last Thursday because of the issues that were involved here, they felt that it was impossible to do anything about it. So they since moved. So 1 would hope that Planning and Zoning --- even though Planning and Zoning has approved this project, that you would see that there is a need to do something different. I would hope that you would disapprove this project. Thanks. Corrie: okay. Bravo: Mr. Mayor, City council, Steve Bravo, I reside at 3713 West Pine. This project won't directly affect myself or my neighbors, but the traffic issue its my main concern. We all know how well Ada county Highway District does their job, and that raises my biggest concern. We could potentially go for 10, 15 years with this traffic problem before they decide to widen Ten Mile and change the lanes. I don't think we can survive for 10 years — we're talking an initial 300 more cars in the morning and in the late evening with everybody going to work at the same time, coming home at the same time. There's no sidewalks. I think it'll just be a mess for a long time, very long time. I don't see the plans from the Highway District going through like they've been proposed at this point. So that's my concern. I'd like to see the project changed to something else with less density. Thank you. Corrie: Thank you. k Meridian City council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 33 Martin: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Council, my name is Steve Markin. I reside at 2885 Vilest Forecast in the development just to the north. I came here for three issues. First issue is safety and traffic. My wife runs a small business out of her home and during the time that Pine was shut down, there was a period between 2:30 and 3:30 that there were cars 12 stacked on our street coming west off of Pine going north on ocean and then west on Ebbett, north on Haven cove, and west on Forecast. Running and business and trying to get to our Meridian Post Office was difficult, and also a safety issue where she had to change her daily schedule. The second issue as I come here with 10 years' property management experience, I'm also a business owner. 1 am located close to Clocktowers Apartments which I understand was part of the question here some weeks ago. We are one of the suppliers on the WYE project; we supply all the concrete barriers, guard rails and safety devices. Clocktowers was originally also planned with a similar two -point -so -many parking spots. I am now experiencing $10,000 a month loss due to property damage. We have the City of Boise Police working with us on a monthly/daily basis every night. I have security going through six times to my business. We are right behind Clocktowers. We have been there, grandfathered, for over 80 years pouring concrete barriers, and Clocktowers has changed, and it does not suffice the property down there. There's people all up and down (inaudible) does have problems. I wanted to issue that here tonight as well. Ask if they appeal again, I don't feel that's a comparison to what's going on here, again, because it is surrounded by single-- family housing. My recommendation is to vote this project down. Thank you. Wilder: Mayor Corrie, council members, my name is Laura Wilder. I live at 3401 West Pine, that's the dirt road part of Pine west of Ten Mile. 1 just wanted to clarify a few things as far as road improvements b ACHD. Myself along with Erma and Dave Atkinson met last week on the 9t of May with Dave Bivens, ACHD commissioner, Larry Sale, Planning and Development Supervisor, and Joe Reslin, Traffic Engineer and Supervisor so that we could understand what their plans really were. one of the spokesmen for the developer said during the Planning and Zoning hearing that they intended to widen Ten Mile by 2004. We acquired a copy of the ACHD five-year plan approved in February, and you've probably seen this, which confirms what we were told by the three gentlemen that we met with. It's not even scheduled for professional services until 2005, and what that means is that serving initial work, the actual planning and development acquisition of right-of-way won't begin until at least 2007. So we are seven to ten years out before there is any widening shoulder improvements, sidewalks, bike, ACHD on Pine or excuse me, on Ten Mile. Pine is not even on this plan. Well, we appreciate the efforts the developer has made in working with the signal and realize that they have gone to great lengths to try to satisfy this, and we believe the signal will help, it still does not change how narrow and how inadequate Ten Mile and Pine are in the surrounding area. Even with turn lanes, if emergency vehicles have to come down there at a congested time, it will be an Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 34 extremely difficult situation because motorists won't be able to get out of the way. There are not shoulders adequate to pull off. on the south side of Ten Mile opposite of where the development will be, there's a big ditch that just drops off. If you have high --school kids lined up, emergency vehicles need to come through, even with the improvements of the development, it can be a difficult, unsafe situation. That in addition to pedestrians walking on the shoulders which are barely wide enough to walk on, I speak for my family and I know many other neighbors, that even with the signal which is an improvement, we are deeply concerned about the inadequacies of Ten Mile and Pine and feel that this project is ahead of its time and is not appropriate for this location until the infrastructure of the roadway's more complete. For these reasons, I ask you to vote no on this project and listen to the rest of the property owners in the area. Thank you. Corrie: I've got a letter here from Arthur and Florence Hall we could enter into record. okay. Anyone else to testify on different -- other than traffic, cut -through and three-story, traffic lights, road improvements? Blaser: My name is Glenn Blaser, and I live at 3450 Stone creek Road, Boise. just like to mention three or four things. Number one, purpose of planning and zoning is to provide adequate buffers and transitions between one zone and another. Lots on the north end there that belong to Thunder creek, I've already had to return the money to the people that bought the lots because fear of this project has frightened them away. How would you like to have a single-family home and 10 feet away from them a line of low garages 300 feet long? These aren't standard garages. They're only 10 feet wide. When you're inside, you can't open the car doors. I think that a decent regard for the money that we put into these subdivisions would require that an adequate transition take place between the R-4 and the R-1 5. 1 don't think 10 feet which is the rear of a long row of garages will look like storage sheds. And you notice that this project has turned its rear -end to the city all the way around the project are garages or the back end of commercial buildings. The aesthetics of the project are -- have to suffer. Another thing, we're required or I was required on all our subdivision in Haven Cove to provide for adequate drainage and run-off. We had to historically all the water on a project that has historically run in the drain ditch continue to run in the drain ditch, any addition water has to be retained on site. There's no place on that project where you could build a storage pond or catch the drainage. Now, I want to point out to you that that roadway that goes around the project is not a roadway. If you look coming from the north, the two roads that come in are the widths that Meridian city required. But this little road that goes around the outside of the project, I think it's 25 feet wide. You'll see it's packed on both sides by garages. People backing out will meet in the center. A fire truck cannot make a turn coming in from Pine and getting there. It has to have, according to all the requirements they put on me, a bigger radius, and it can't turn. If a fire truck were attempting to go around that 25 -foot strip and any cars backing out, wouldn't be possible. I don't think that --- I'm not opposed to apartments on this site. I think that this, in a way, is an improvement over the first presentation, but I t t Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 35 am just horrified of the thought that Mr. Jepson's property, our property, part of it here on Pine, all the way up Ten Mile, going to have the rear -end of storage sheds. I think that from the viewpoint of aesthetics, that ought to really be reconsidered. Who wants to see the garbage cans on the rear -end of a --- and these buildings. see that one along Pine? That's 300, 400 feet long. one continuous roof. That won't be a thing of beauty. Hasn't a petition been sent to the council? We've had a vast number of the neighbors sign a petition. Hasn't anyone — Thank you very much. Tamas: Good evening, Mayor and Council members. My name is Marie Tamas. I live at 1125 N. Roper. I'm not going to say anything about the traffic or the apartment complex. I'm going to focus on the business that they say is going to be there. Now, I work in Boise, and I drive up and down Franklin, and I see this beautiful office building. It's on Franklin at the cross street I don't know. I see that they took many months making it, putting a beautiful roof on it, and l think there's only one business there. There's at least three spaces unavailable. There's nothing there. They want to build another one, business office building, downtown. You want to bring people downtown, but yet, this is not quite in the City of Meridian. What business person wants to move out there now when there's nothing around there but apartments and homes? People aren't going to drive that far out to go to the doctor's office or anything like that and then have to go in town to have X-rays or something. So I think for right now, businesses, offices, are not needed out there. You want to draw people to the city, not away from the city. Thank you. Corrie: somebody here have a petition that they wanted to give to us? Is it different than the petition that we got from the Planning and Zoning? Just a question. Walther: Yes, sir. instead of 171 signatures, there's 304 signatures now. That encompasses three subdivisions, four subdivisions around the surrounding area. My name is Reese Walther. I reside at 1148 N. Lightning Place which is just north of the proposed plan. I also have a copy of a couple different letters that as 1 was going around getting the petition signed and as others were going around getting petitions signed, we stressed that if you can't be here tonight that you would give us a letter that addresses their concerns. if I could give you these and a copy of the petition. You've heard a lot of testimony already about pretty much all of the topics that were on the petition except for one. The one that is dear to my heart being a teacher in the Meridian School District is the schools and other services such as Fire Department and Police Department. schools are already extremely overcrowded; there's over 900 students in chaparral which is where elementary students in this project would have to go to school. I was just talking to a teacher today who said her class size was, average, was between 27 and 30 students. Now could you imagine trying to handle 30 third -graders by yourself? That's an enormous amount of students, and you're just going to Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 36 increase it. Now, when I brought that up to Planning and zoning and the School District's concerns, they laughed at me. One reason they laughed at me was because there are proposed new schools going in. Well, that, too, I laughed. I said that to the teacher. I said, well, there's a new elementary school going in, right? So that's going to drop the class size. She said, oh, no. That's not going to affect my class size one bit. That's going to be a year --around school which are completely separate students. Not any other students are going to be going to those. So that's chaparral. Meridian Middle School is extremely overcrowded. True, we have now Lewis and Clark Middle School going in; however, they're almost to capacity as it is. Eagle Middle School which is the school that I teach at, just to give you an example, it has absolutely nothing to do with this project, Eagle Middle School doesn't, but this year alone we had almost 1400 students. The school was built for 1,000. You should try to walk down the hallways. I'm a cart teacher, so I go from room to room to room trying to get my cart down the halls. It's a trick for sure. That's how schools are right now in the Meridian School District. This is way too dense for the area, and we need — I realize that we're going to grow. We're going to. That's great. But this is too dense for the area. The last thing that I'd like to talk about, well, two more things. Fire and Police protection. We're already overdone as it is. We need more fire protection, and along with police protection.. A couple concerns that I had watching a 20120 just this last month on apartment safety: There's been no mention of lighting in the area. I haven't seen any plans about the lighting, where the lighting is, and also on the 20120, the new show, I forget which one it is, it mentioned something about Post Office boxes, where they were located, had a substantial impact on safety of residents. The last thing I'd like to talk about, a lot has been said about traffic just right around Pine and Ten Mile. But we should also consider the traffic down on Linder because if we're adding 250, at least, vehicles just residing there, then if you have company and visitors and such, you're talking 300, 350 vehicles every day running back and forth running around there. Think about Franklin and Ten Mile. Think about overland and Ten Mile. Think about the whole surrounding area. Sure, if you put a stoplight here at Pine and Ten Mile, so that's fixed, but then you go down the street a quarter mile and you've got traffic backed up at the stoplight back there. That's all I have to say. Thank you. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, 1 have a question for Mr. Walther. Maybe it's for a lot of the concerns that have been expressed here tonight. What do you -- what would you like to see there? Are you suggesting that single --family housing development would be better? Walther: Sure, that would be my preference. If 1 could pick what could be there, I'd sure say single-family homes. But like a lot of the other residents around, many of us said that we wouldn't be opposed to necessarily apartments or townhomes or something of that nature going in, but 130 of them? That's extreme. one thing that the comprehensive Plan says is that they wanted to Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 37 steer this type of residence out closer to downtown, closer to old Town so that they have access to things. They don't have access to anything here except fields with no sidewalks leading anywhere. deWeerd : Well, the access would be in the future planning of the Ten Mile Interchange. But do you understand that a single-family housing development that would encompass this piece of property would cause more traffic, would feed more students into the school district, and if you don't do anything, developments are going to appear in other places that would feed traffic into those areas, and who's going to improve those roads? Those roads are going to be better off with the three lanes and the traffic light rather than having nothing and having that creek there which is a terrible hazard. It's going to be creating sidewalks that at least they can get through Valeri Heights. I know my kids -- my kids go to Chaparral. I know what they bike on. It's frightening. I've also been standing where you all have been. We have an empty field behind our house. It's no longer empty. They're developing it right now. That was before we even had Chaparral. Linder was bursting — we had portables. So the School District says the same form letter every single development, and unfortunately, we have no impact on the schools. If this doesn't come and single-family housing does, the impact is much greater on that intersection, and it's much greater on our schools, and if it doesn't happen, the traffic's going to increase in that area. I drive that area too, but you're not going to have the road improvements. Unfortunately the hard lesson that we have learned since I've stood where you stand and where I sit now, is development comes first, and they're the ones that pay for it. As frustrating as that is, that's the reality that we have to work with. Our Comprehensive Plan designates this piece of property as mixed use. It's defined as exactly that: a multi -use area that unfortunately I don't want to see Meridian become all R-4 development all over the place. We have to start planning for transit, and this is close to the railroad tracks. It's also going to be close to hopefully somewhere where we're going to get the Ten Mile Interchange. In order to get that interchange, we're going to have to have some road improvements there, too. So it's a harsh reality, but — Walther: Can 1 address that? Corrie: Just very briefly, please. Walther: Sure. The proposed comprehensive Plan as it stood just a month ago until somebody railroaded something through without anybody's say, nobody in the public got to hear anything about it. The last thing I heard about the proposed comprehensive Plan was that a survey was going to go out to the public. I've never seen a survey, nor has any of our neighbors, nor has any of those 304 people that have signed a petition. The proposed comprehensive Plan as it stood just a month ago was proposed as medium density. We don't have anything against medium density because we know, we understand, that Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 38 we need to grow, and we understand that we need those things that you were Just addressing; however, just across the street is going to be zoned either commercial or R-40 or something high density because it was closer to the railroad tracks which is going to be that transit system. Now, I wouldn't have any problem with medium density in there or R-8 or townhomes or mixed even, business and townhomes or businesses and two-story apartments. But this way here gives us no transition into anything. deWeerd: one comment on the comprehensive Plan, that is not finished. It is still in draft form. It will be going to public hearing probably in the next month or two, probably two months, and we did have the public participate in it, but certainly get your names to the Planning and Zoning office and they can let you know when the open house is and that's where comments will be received because it's not a done deal. Walther: Sure, and I understand that. I was very unhappy when I saw the proposed plan just a month ago and it said (inaudible) -- deWeerd: Right now we still have to operate until that one's done. Walther: I understand, but I think that should — it's the voice of the community Just this last year, and I think you guys should take that into account. deWeerd: Thank you. Corrie: Anybody else? I don't want this to get a big blow --up here, but if you've got something that hasn't been testified to — Pearson: My name is Brian Pearson. I live at 1158 North Clara Avenue just north of the proposed apartment complex. I think that all the points have been well covered. I wasn't going to even speak until the last exchange with Ms. deWeerd. The notion that there will be lesser traffic density — let's never mind the school population problems -- the notion that there will be lesser traffic density with these high density dwelling units as opposed to R-4, it just doesn't fly In these cases. You'd have perhaps three or four homes per acre and so what if my math serves me correct, that's between 36 and 48 homes if it were R--4. So 36 to 48 cars commuting per morning if there's a car and--a-half average it runs up from there. With 136 units, the tenants aren't going to be able to pay $600 and $700 and $800 a month rent which is what we heard at the Planningand Zoning Commission without working somewhere. Eighty percent or so of jobs are 8:00 to 5:00 or thereabouts. They're going to enter the streets. I also mentioned before that this is like a Clocktower clone. Clocktower was a professed, at least, to be luxury apartments off of 36th Street in Boise. I lived there while my home was being constructed here. What you often times find is that it just doesn't end up being a family -type environment. So that is targeted (inaudible) put the amenities in to attract the families. It just doesn't fly after 4 Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 39 awhile. It gets to be a younger crowd, a very social atmosphere. Families move out. Well, you need to keep those $800 -a -month apartments rented because that's what pays the bill, that's what the property comes from. So what you find is three single persons occupying an $800 -a -month three-bedroom or two single persons, each having to work. So now on a per -dwelling basis, per-unit basis, at least on the twos and threes, you've got two or three cars entering the traffic patterns in the morning. So I understand that there are some studies in some text books that suggest multi -family dwellings have more traffic patterns, and in some cases that holds. But in a case like this, ma'am, it just doesn't. It doesn't hold. It doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Thanks for the opportunity. deWeerd: well, I actually agreed with you until I got debated, and smart growth actually has statistics that will back it up because I had the same opinion that he did. Pearson: well, there are some theories, ma'am, in some text books that might lead that way under certain circumstances, but I don't think that you'd need a text book to tell you that pay that kind of rent if you're going to live in there and be as a family, you have to go to work. I mean, who pays $700 or $800 a month in rent if you don't go to work? The predominate work force is 8:00 to 5:00 or thereabouts. You have to enter the traffic stream. Somebody does to pay that rent. But what I'm saying is where it gets further compounded is you don't have one family or one working member per household. You often times have two and three. That's what occurred at Clocktower, and this is a clone. That's just not conducive to family atmosphere. They start out that way and amenities do attract some families. I think in my clocktower experience one retiree, but that is short-lived. It's just short-lived. Then in that relatively social environment it's often times two and three young single persons per residence, and you've got a pool and a basketball court. Friends tend to show up in mass. So it isn't within the normal traffic pattern. The peak times, at least, but it sure is in those Friday and Saturday evenings. This is simply a clone to that. I really don't believe that there is any evidence suggesting that it would be any different. They could say that in their occupancy plan is going to be family, but families don't stay in a place like this, and they have to keep them rented. Single folks will show up. So there are instances that 1 would agree with the theorists that provide you an argument that would prevail. Not in a case like this ma'am. Corrie: Thank you. Anybody else to testify anything different? We've still got the other side to rebut. Schraeder: My name is Margie Schraeder. Mayor and city council, we own a property in Thunder creek Subdivision on North Gray Cloud. The only thing that would like to just make mention of is that when the homeowners and the builders chose to build there, there was nothing there. They're being asked to compromise their property values and their quality of life for this apartment Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 40 complex and the office building. i agree with the current homeowner that a single-family dwelling or a person that's going to buy a single-family home does not necessarily want to be backed up against an office building; however, you're asking them to compromise with townhouses and apartment complexes and office buildings. My suggestion, and if the City Council is to decline this and look at something as a transition, a single-family and possibly cluster townhouses or something against the office so that the property owners in that Subdivision does not have to compromise their values and the developer at that point in time can deal with people making that decision to choose to buy or build up against an office complex or something. My — I think it would be much better served for the community to have single-family up against Thunder Creek Subdivision and surrounding area. I'm not necessarily against the office building, but I think that the townhouses and the multi -use should be clustered up against the offices and not against the single-family subdivision. I ask you to decline this as it stands. Thanks. Corrie: Anyone else? Sir, if there's nobody else testifying, you had a point that you wanted to raise. If you'll come up here and give your name again, and I'll allow that. You want to talk yet? Okay. Come up and then I'll -- Meyer: My name is Seth Meyer, and I live on Roper Place which is in the Haven Cove Subdivision which is actually connected to the Thunder Creek. My question to you is: Does the city have a plan for the use of the property in the City and when they annex, when they add sections to the city, do they have a plan for what sections of the City are going to be what type of use? Corrie: That's the comprehensive Plan. Meyer: It is. And in the Comprehensive Plan, it allows for apartment complexes in this area? Corrie: Under mixed use. Meyer: It does? Under mixed use? And so are there apartment complexes in this area currently? Bird: I don't believe so. Meyer: All my question is I know that it's allowed, but 1 just wonder about how when you approve things, if you look at how everything's laid out. A friend of mine is a developer, and he was looking at buying a ten -acre parcel which is in between 1 ot" Street and 12 th Street which is on Pine, same street. It's on the south side of the street, and he was planning on putting commercial and apartment buildings in that property. There's a complex called Sunbridge, I believe, which is a care facility. 1 don't know if any of you are familiar with this property. It's got a big sign and it says 10 +- acres. That does not have the Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 41 problems of the irrigation canal to have to put curb and gutter next to --- the expense to develop that property is going to be a lot less than the corner that this developer is looking at. You know, if he wants to look at a property, why not look at a property that would make more sense to do it on? Anyway, that's my comment. Corrie: Now your comment. Lambert: Just a quick comment. It's been said quite a few times tonight — Rick Lambert. It's been said quite a few times tonight that the 1993 comprehensive Plan has it zoned as mixed use. It is zoned mixed residential. There is also a problem with that during the Planning and Zoning meeting, and there was comments made to the 2900 plan, the March 2900 draft which is medium residential. I noticed that even tonight you also — one of the items on — *** End of Side 3 *** Lambert: -- you mentioned medium residential on the rezone of Item No. 1 which is the 2990 plan which the Planning and Zoning pretty much threw out of hand because it hasn't been adopted yet, but you're referring to it. So the only point I want to make is that it's been zoned residential, and mixed residential or medium residential depending on which plan you wish to adopt. Corrie: okay. You have about 19 minutes to answer questions from the developer — answer any questions that might come up from the Council might come up. Dolby: Mr. Mayor, council members, my name is Pat Dolby for the record. I just would like to take a minute to respond to the traffic issues that were raised. The first one was the issue of cut --through traffic through the adjacent residential subdivisions. There .is- nothing in the site circulation to encourage vehicles to cut through the adjacent s-ubdivisions. This is something that was reviewed with the Highway District and ,with the addition of the signal and (inaudible) proposed, it will probably reduce the amount of cut --through traffic instead of increasing it. The other thing is mixed use developments like this reduce travel demand. They provide employment opportunities, they provide services on site to the local market area, and it will cut down on the amount of traffic that's impacting the system. This is a fairly progressive mix of land uses for a site like this especially on a future arterial like Ten Mile Road. The existing road conditions on Ten Mile Road and Pine Avenue to a certain extent, a typical of urban fringe areas in development communities. This is really no different than conditions that exist at most arterials before development came along. As you know, sidewalks are provided by developers, and the Highway District is not very proactive about building new capacity in anticipation of growth. As a matter of fact, they're quite reactive. capacity, according to the transportation plan and their policy is paid Meridian city council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 42 for through impact fees and direct development contributions of improvements. The contribution of the lanes, the sidewalk and the traffic signal at this location will be an incentive for the Highway District to speed up and accelerate development of Ten Mile Road. In addition, this project is going to pay approximately $250,000 in impact fees in addition to the cost of site -required improvements. Monies that could be earmarked and eventually will be used to improve roads in this general area. As far as the scheduling and the current program for improving Ten Mile Road, you know, priorities change. This — ACHD moves projects around in their five --year work program twice a year. They do tend to react to hotspots. Where the growth is occurring is where the capital flows. Thank you. Corrie: I had a question. The ACH D, Terry Little sent a memo to us that the Planning and Zoning added the (inaudible) to developer to construct the traffic signal before occupancy, and I believe that was one of the recommendations to the council. It says that if the commission does not approve the AcHD participation; in other words, we're willing to provide the hardware if you design and construct the traffic signal. But if they don't, then you'll have to do the responsibility, the developer, entirely to put that signal in. Is that your understanding? Dolby: Yes, Mr. Mayor. Corrie: They don't participate — you're going to do it all? Dolby: I think AcHD -- yes. If you, the city, were to make that a condition of approval, you know, and tie it to a specific development phase, then that's obviously something that would have to be complied with. 1 think ACHD's policy is pretty clear on participating to a certain degree in this type of improvement. These are both system roads, and there is an enormous cost that's gained by the Highway District by having the developer put the signal in at this point in time. So I would assume that when it got to the commission that they would be consistent with the way they've done business in the past, and they would provide the hardware. Now, withstanding, if you should make it a condition of approval and something that's going to have to be lived with. Corrie: But if they don't, you will. I don't know what AcHD commissioners — if they say no and we require signaliZation, you're going to have to do it all? Dolby: That would be my understanding. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I have a question. I don't know if this is appropriate for you, but the sidewalk that you guys showed along Ten Mile, does that go up — is there a sidewalk in from of Thunder creek? Does it connect to anything? kr �, s f Meridian city Council Meeting May 1G, 2000 Page 43 Dolby: I don't know. Anderson: There's not sidewalk in front of Thunder creek? Unidentified: Yes, there is, but it doesn't go anywhere. It just ends on both ends. Corrie: okay. Bailey: David Bailey again for the record. I guess I want to touch on a couple of issues. The answer to your question, council member Anderson, is yes there is a sidewalk in front of there that we'll tie to. That doesn't get us all the way to Cherry Lane, but as it develops in between, that's the intent that we get that sidewalk to Cherry Lane and down to however far it needs to go to the south as those properties develop. I just wanted to touch on a couple of issues real quick and then answer any questions you have. on the drainage issue, I have done the preliminary drainage calculations on the site and am confident that the drainage Swale areas that I show on the site be sufficient to handle the drainage. Of course, we have a detailed plan and intend to meet all those requirements. Just for example, the rain on the site would be, and Mr. Blaser brought this up before, the issues, the rain on the site would be 10,000 c.f. of rainfall that could accumulate. The drainage areas that are shown on the site are about 23,000 s.f. just in those drainage areas shown there. So if it was all retained just in those without any infiltration or any other, the run-off from the site, we would expect that to be about eight inches deep in those swale areas, the water that would be held in there. I don't know that I can add a whole lot to what Mrs. deWeerd came up with on or presented or — I don't know exactly how to address that, but I think it's really important to the concept that we believe that this project will improve the conditions in the area significantly, and our single-family development would not be required to improve the conditions like this is. I don't think a developer could afford to do it if they were going to do a single-family development. We'd be talking probably 50 homes in there which would produce about 500 vehicle trips per day, and we're producing 1320 vehicle trips per day with this development. That's what the text --book numbers come up with. So we're talking about increasing the traffic by less than 10 percent from the numbers we have for Pine and Ten Mile, but we're talking about tripling the capacity -- it may be more than that of that intersection. I think that it would serve to reduce the traffic through the neighborhoods. I do see this as, in trying to look objectively at it, I see it as a benefit to the general public, I see it as a benefit to the city of Meridian in providing the apartments that are needed, the mix of housing that's needed in the City of Meridian. I see it as a benefit to the neighbors to the north in reducing the cut -through traffic. I see it as a benefit to Albertson's in having more people to go there. There are a lot of benefits. The one problem that I do see is the neighbors directly to the north will have some impact on their properties due to this development. But that's what the comprehensive Plan says, and the people to the north, I guess you can't expect everybody to Meridian City council Meeting May '16, 2000 Page 44 understand what the comprehensive Plan means when they buy a house and what it means may happen on the property next door, but it's our responsibility, and we've done what we've thought is our best to make this the best transition we could within this project. I was going to talk about the timing of the signal, but I think you've already discussed that, so I'd be glad to answer any questions you might have. Bird: I have none. Corrie: Anybody else in your group? I think you wanted — Marceeze: Again, my name is Michael Marceeze. 1 represent property management. I'd just like to address some of the statements that were made regarding the number of cars that an apartment property generates, the number of children that live in a size of apartment property. We've heard statements or some of these letters that there would be 150 additional children out of 136 units. There's another statement that there would be 500 more people live there and 250 more cars. What we'd like to do is invite the manager of Aspen Hills Apartments, it's 120 units, to come up and just state for the record how many children she has, how many cars she has come and go and just clarify accuracy on those statements. Bird: No. Corrie: No. we're not going — I'm not going to do that. You don't need to. You made your point. Marceeze: It's significantly less than the statements being made. Just a final comment: Not every property has to be a clone of the Clocktower. The Clocktower has been poorly mismanaged, and not every property — Aspen Hills as an example. There are many large apartment complexes. Aspen Hills is a 120 units. The Clocktower is 310 units. It's definitely been mismanaged, and that's what has caused the problems there. Thank you. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I have a question for the gentleman. Who are some of your prospective retail clients down here in this office area? Do you have any at this point? Marceeze: Not at this point. I'm more dealing with the residential rather than the commercial management, but at this point, there aren't any — until the project's approved, you can't market it. obviously, not liquor stores and high traffic kinds of things that aren't conducive to residential desires. Anderson: Thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 45 Corrie: okay. If you're done with your — Council, questions? Anybody at this point? deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, I just wonder — Keith Borup is here, the Chair of Planning and Zoning. Does he have any comment? Borup: I don't think so. You got the recommendation. The recommendation was not unanimous. There were five Planning and Zoning and three voted for the recommendation. I think everything else is on record and included tonight. deWeerd: But the intent of the P & Z was that that traffic signal be put in before occupancy; correct? Borup: Is that the way the motion was written? deWeerd: That's the way I read it. Borup: I think that came about because of testimony from the applicant. I don't believe that we tried to put words in their mouths, but they made a statement, and we decided that was part of it. If the applicant feels differently than that, maybe they ought to express that. Corrie: I think they expressed that they would. Borup: I mean if they felt different than they had proposed it, they had proposed it and we agreed and made that part of the recommendation after their proposal. Corrie: Any questions of Council? deWeerd: Just one more question for Shari. Shari, what are the rear setbacks for R-8? Stiles: They would be 15 feet. deWeerd: What is a usual buffer between residential uses? Stiles: Between residential uses? deWeerd: Yes, between a single-family and a multi -family. Are there required buffer areas? Stiles: No. The Comprehensive Plan talks about transitional densities, but in the general consensus in planning is that residential uses, whether they be multi- family or single-family are compatible uses. They're both residential. It's not considered an incompatible use. Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 46 deWeerd: Thank you. Corrie: Any other comments, questions? Bird: Mr. Mayor, I'd just like to make one comment. The same like every time something comes up, it's the schools involved. I invite all the people to go find out how many school children we have in the City of Meridian. I think you'll find it's less than 30 percent. The crowding of the schools can't be blamed on all of the development within Meridian. In fact, there's more of our Meridian School District facilities inside the City limits of Boise than there are in the City of Meridian. That's a scare tactic that a lot of people like to use like we do on some of our other service things. So with me it doesn't bring any water. Corrie: Comments, council? Okay. Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing — excuse me. Mr. Attorney. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, the record should reflect any of these other letters that have been received by the Mayor and council that should be included in the record. Corrie: That's correct. And all testimony from all the people in three of these for the request for the annexation and zoning, the preliminary plat, and the Conditional Use Permit would be entered as testimony by all of them. Thank you. Hearing no other comments, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing on Items 7, 8 and 9. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we close the public hearings on the request for annexation and zoning, the request for preliminary plat and the request for the Conditional Use Permit for Valeri Heights Subdivision on the corner of Pine and Ten Mile. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and seconded to close the public hearing on Items 71 8 and 9. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: okay, we'll go — take these one at a time. Item No. 7 is the request for the annexation and zoning of the 12.73 acres from R --T to L -O and R-15 zones. Council, comments? Discussion? Okay. Hearing none, then I'll entertain a motion on the request for the annexation and zoning. t t.. Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 47 Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I guess I'll start off. I would like to make a comment. Give me a chance to gather my thoughts a bit. I think looking at this project from the time it came before us a while back, 1 think they've done a considerable amount of improvements. I like the fact that the developer is willing to step forward and make some necessary improvements that are needed at the intersection of Ten Mile and Pine street. 1, too, happen to be a resident and five in that area and travel that area quite often, so I am very familiar with that area. I have some concerns as well as a lot of the neighbors about the streets around there and the capacity and the fact that the sidewalks go nowhere. At this point, there's not a lot of connectivity in that particular junction. Again, I think that will come, but at what time, I have no idea. I'm kind of like you. We don't have those dates firmed up. I do have. some concerns about the mix of the office with the apartment complex. I guess my preference would be to see the office portion of this come out of here and to maybe do some of that transitioning with the project around the other subdivisions where we did some transitional things with some less density and somemore single-family or duplexes and then merge into the apartment complexes. I don't think this is necessarily a bad area for the complexes or for the apartments. I do still I have some question about the term using — using the term "luxury apartments." I have a hard time equating a three- story apartment with vinyl siding as luxury. It just doesn't match in my book. I think luxury apartments might do very well in this area, and probably would be more acceptable to the neighbors if there was some transitioning that was involved here. So 1 guess I'm still kind of up in the air on this project. It's better than it looked a few months ago, but I still think that it could have some improvements. That's my comment. McCandless: Mr. Mayor, since we're making comments, I may be by myself on these, but I do think it's a beautiful concept. It's well thought of and well put together. I agree with Mr. Anderson that I really don't see the need for business buildings out there. I don't know what they'd put in there unless they put in an ice cream store or something of that sort. Maybe a pizza. But as far as -- it's pretty far out for regular businesses. To say that businesses would certainly add to the traffic since you were all talking about the traffic. My major concern is I don't care how you put it, how many traffic lights, how many stop signs or anything else you put out there, Ten Mile is still a two-lane road, and Pine Avenue is still a two-lane road. I know how slow these things go. Somebody said something about a Ten Mile Interchange. well, we've been trying to get that out there for a long time, and I don't think it's been in the works for at least 10 years. I am afraid I'm going to have to vote no on it for those reasons. Corrie: Any other comments? Bird: I don't have any, but I'll go with the motion if you want. deweerd: Mr. Mayor, 1 guess I'm the Ione soldier up here who likes a mixed-use development. I see a lot of value in having services where residents live, and Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2009 Page 48 looking at traffic and those kinds of concerns, I don't think right now those services are going to serve a huge population. I'll tell you what. We're growing west, and eventually — well, I think those were the comments that they had about the doctor's office on the corner of Ten Mile and cherry Lane as well. That practice is flourishing. So are the businesses that are residing in the commercial strip next to Albertson's. I don't think that's an issue. I don't think that filling in that office space with additional apartment buildings is really the option here either. Really, that's what they would do. If you don't have office there, they're going to fill that space, and they're going to fill it with apartments. I think that a neighborhood office is certainly more compatible than another two huge buildings sitting in that spot and residences that are going to be going in and out of there. I don't see that the office itself is going to hamper this, and it probably will have neighborhood services that will service the residents in that area, but who knows. We should put restrictions on what type of businesses can go in there, and 1 think staff has addressed that in their comments. So I think that good planning is starting to utilize the neighborhood office in a better way to have more services closer to home. Bird: Mr. Mayor, 1 guess I can give my two cents' worth, too. I agree with Tammy to the fact that I don't — I think that offices are designed offices, and I think that's what you're going to see. I doubt that you're going to see a whole lot of retail out there. We are moving out there. Cherry Lane has proven that with the office complexes and retails we've had there have been successful. If we worry about infrastructure, folks, I hate to tell you since 1973, Meridian had another thing outside of the boundaries that they had in 1973, and we haven't gotten very much from Ada county Highway District since then. So infrastructure is not a big — it is a big deal, but it isn't something that you're going to get in before you can develop. 1 guess with that comment, if the Mayor will take it, I'll make a motion that we approve the annexation and rezone of 12.73 acres from R -T to L -o and R-15 for proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision for the attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and Decision of order. deWeerd: Second. Corrie: I know where this is going. okay. Excuse me. Motion has been made to accept the request for the annexation and zoning of R -T to L -O and R-15 zones. Any further discussion? Mr. Clerk, roll -call vote, please. Roll call: deWeerd, aye, McCandless, nay; Anderson, xray; Bird, aye. Corrie: I guess I get to vote. Well, I think that the project is a lot better from the one we saw the first time. I can't make anymore comments on that because it's already done. I do think that we've got some very difficult traffic problems here. Having worked with ACHD, they're rather slow. The developer says that he will put the signal in. That's good. Sidewalks are good on one side, however on the Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 49 other side we don't have sidewalks yet. It sounds like they might connect over there. I would like to see a little different design here if approved the zoning. I don't know that I like the back end of the buildings facing the streets, and listening to all of the testimony tonight, there's been good and there's been bad. Everybody has good ideas of what they'd like to see the neighborhood at. I know that if I vote no then it will kill the project as far as the zoning is concerned at this point. It may have to come back with — try again with a different plat and what they have the idea. So saying all that, I'm going to vote no. So we have tie with two ayes, two nays, and a vote of no. The annexation and zoning is defeated at this point. MOTION CARRIED: TIE BREAKER: TWO AYES TO THREE NAYS. Corrie: Item No. 8 which is a request for preliminary plat. can't do that because we don't have a zoning. I guess if Mr. Attorney, you can draw up the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law on the annexation and zoning, we will vote against the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Lave. Is that correct? Next time? In relationship to Items 7 and 8, am I correct that's a moot point? 8 and 9. Sorry. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the council, my recommendation would be that if you're going to deny what you have, the annexation and zoning, then you vote — I mean, it may be a moot point, but they're still entitled to a decision of order on these other items. You would need to vote on each of those as well. Corrie: okay. Then I'll entertain a motion then on Item No. 8, the preliminary plat. Bird: I move that we deny the preliminary plat of 10 building lots and 2 other lots on 12.73 acres for the proposed Valeri Heights Subdivision NE of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road and for the attorney to draw up the appropriate Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law showing the denial. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to deny the application for preliminary plat. Any further discussion? Roll -call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll -call: deWeerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: item No. 9 then is the conditional Use Permit for the Valeri Heights Subdivision. Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 50 Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we have the attorney draw up the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and Decision of order denying the CUP for 128 -unit apartment complex, townhouses and office on 12.73 acres for proposed L -O and R-15 zones, NE corner of Pine Avenue and Ten Mile Road. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to deny the conditional Use Permit for the Item No. 9, townhouses and office of 12.73 acres for proposed L -O and R-15 zones. Any further discussion's Hearing none, roll -call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll -call: deWeerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we take a five-minute break. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded that we take a five-minute break. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES (Meeting reconvened at 10:42 p.m.) Corrie: okay. We're back from recess. Item 10. Public Hearing: Az 00-007 Request for annexation and zoning of 6.68 acres from RT to L -O for proposed carol Professional Center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. - west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: Item 11. Public Hearing: CUP 00-020 Request for conditional Use Permit to construct 8 office buildings on 6.68 acres in proposed L -O zone for proposed Carol Professional Center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. — west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: Item 12. Public Hearing: PP 00-007 Request for Preliminary Platapproval of eight lots on 6.68 acres in proposed L -O zone for proposed Carol Professional Center by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. -- west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road: . ...... ...... Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 51 Corrie: Item No. 10 is a public hearing, request for annexation and zoning of 0.08 acres from R -T to L -o for proposed Carol Professional Center by J -U -B Engineers, west side of Eagle Road between Fairview Avenue and Ustick Road. At this time I'll open the public hearing on Item No. 10 and invite staff comments first. Bird: Mayor, can we do 10 and 11 together and 12? Corrie: 101 11 and 12. okay, I'll open the public hearings on Items 10, 11 and 12. one is for the annexation and zoning, second is No. 11 for a Conditional Use Permit, and 12 is for a preliminary plat. How come — out of order here. Well, we'll catch it back when it comes in. Shari, we're — public testimony now on Items 107 11 and 12, Carol Professional Center. Stiles: Could we combine all three of these, too? oh, they did that already. This is for 0.0 acres on Eagle Road. It's the remainder piece that is left over when the Elementary School — School District took this, and they're building the River Valley Elementary. You got a copy of Brad Hawkins -Clark's memo dated May 15th? Brad had reviewed the Findings — the Recommendations of P & Z the issues that were still remaining were the opticom device. I believe that Mr. Barnes didn't want to make a commitment at that time because he wasn't sure of the cost of it. Chief Bowers informed me that that device is $3,000 each. So if they had to have one on the east -west road, that would be $3,000 and another $3,000 for the Eagle Road for future. He was wondering if he could be reimbursed for that cost, but I believe that would probably be up to Ada County Highway District if they were going to provide any reimbursement of that. The plat — that didn't show up very well. This is Eagle Road. They have a roadway coming in that would be adjacent to the Kleiner Property, and they're proposing a roadway that would go into the side here. However, this property here is owned by the Meridian School District. Staff was concerned that the Meridian School District needs to be signatory to the plat in order for that to be dedicated as a public road. They currently are not. I don't — Nancy Taylor can address that as part of her presentation. On the parking stall sizes, it's hard to see — is this the revised plan, Nancy? It's real hard to see. The applicant was proposing some compact stalls that would be less than our minimum requirement for compact stalls. They were showing some landscaping kind of bumped out, but there's plenty of room for landscaping without that. We would like that landscaping to be removed and for the compact stalls to be minimum of 15 feet and also to provide an island in this area to kind of break up that asphalt area, parking lot. Showing the street sign, this is the elevation. Front and rear elevations of the buildings. Okay. This is a little better. This is actually showing the proposed building footprints. They would have 20 -foot planting strips adjacent to the residential use. They have some setback requests for variance — not requesting specifically a variance, but as part of this planned development, the setbacks here would be less than minimum. Other than those three issues, staff doesn't have any E Meridian city Council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 52 additional comments beyond that and would recommend approval with the Planning and Zoning Recommendations and a clarification of the op ticom and whether we can approve this plat without the consent of the Meridian school District since that is part of the proposed roadway system. Corrie: Shari, about the setbacks, why aren't these where pp they're supposed to be? Stiles: This is a planned development. They did come in for our Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a mixed/planned use designation. It was approved. As art pp . p of a planned development, when they provide the 10 percent common area the . � a y can propose things that are less than Ordinance requirement. Corrie: Thank you. I missed that earlier. Thank you. . Okay y Testimon on the public hearing --we Il have the developer. Good to see you again. Taylor: Good evening, Mayor, members of the Council. I'm Nancy Taylor for with J -U -B Engineers, 250 South Beechwood, Boise. You've seen thisJro'ect. p Unfortunately, these aren't very good drawings, andy ou should have better ones in your packets. Actually, I have a handout for you that may helpjust a little bit. This tabulation that you may find interesting on thero1'ect. This is actually y on your drawing (inaudible -- walked away from the mic) give just Quickly �, theseyou the outline of the eight buildings, the land area for each building,the building g area. So the two buildings along Eagle Road. You can see that north area. The two buildings along Eagle Road will be each about 26,000 -plus s.f. The building coverages of the buildings, 50 percent is allowed and we have under 30p ercent. You're probably not interested too much in the asphalt area. That's on calculating landscaping, but we did address the parking, and we do have as staff said 87 more parking places really needed. So we'll be able to remove those compact spaces easily, and we will as one of the conditions as for here make some adjustments in the parking on Item No. 3 in the memo of 5.15. That can easily be handled with the amount of building area. So 3 is easilytaken care of. Let's -- we should jump up to 1 . The item on the o ticom, 1 think -- Shari if you're p � telling me correctly, that's -- I think that the City clerk suggested around$5,000 gg last time, so that was pretty close. You're saying $5,000? Stiles: For two devices. Taylor: For two? And I'm sure that that would meet with Mr. Barnes' approval. So that would be fine. Item — Anderson: Excuse me. I have a question. You said that would meet with his approval, and that would be fine, but what he's asking here for is the possibility of . � ty being reimbursed later on. Are you saying that he would waive that? Meridian city Council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 53 Taylor: Yes. I'm saying that he agreed to the $5,000 when he was here at the last meeting. It was an approximate amount of $5,000, and if it — I don't know. Around $5,000 or $7,000 not to exceed that, I'm sure that he would be agreeable, and, yes, to forego the reimbursement. Anderson: Thank you. Taylor: On Item No. 3, excuse me, 2, this was just called to our attention about this road, and I did talk to the owner, Don Barnes, this evening. His feeling is that the school District, this will certainly be taken care of, but he believes, but he could not reach the School District, but that it's already been dedicated to ACHD. So one way or another, either as a direct dedication by the School District to ACH D or as a signatory on the plat will be taken care of, yes. And the only other item that is not on this list was I believe the Mayor mentioned that reduced setback along the west property that's adjacent to the school yard. We adjusted that because we felt that there were no buildings there and it was going to be open. It seemed, in fact, to be an amenity. So we just requested that setback. There was one of the neighbors here tonight to speak tonight, spoke before in favor of the project, and he was in your notes if you read the minutes from the prior meeting, and I don't — I believe he left. It's getting late. The neighborhood, we're just very pleased that that neighborhood to the north which the first three houses are affected by this project, are very supportive of the project and the landscaping. They have already discussed with Mr. Barnes' the type of fencing they'd like along there. So its very amicable. I believe those are the Mems unless I'm missing something. I'd be happy to answer any other questions. We're very pleased with the project. The landscaping along Eagle Road will be 35 feet of landscaping there. It will be installed prior to building permits being issued. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, I just want to compliment you with this. 1 know when it came through on your amendment, there were a number of neighbors who had concerns, and it looks like you worked well with them, and this is a nice project. Taylor: Thank you. We think so, also. Since Mr. Barnes does live in that neighborhood, that was also an assistance. Corrie: Thank you. Any questions of council? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Anyone else that would like to issue testimony on these items? Okay. y Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion from Council to close theublic hearing. p g deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, 1 move that we close the public hearing on Item 10 11 and 12. ' Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 54 Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion's made and seconded to close the public hearings on Items 10, 11 and 12. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: okay. Now some further discussion? If not, we'll take Item 10 first, the request for annexation and zoning, AZ 00-007. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the request for annexation and zoning of 6.68 acres from R -T to L -O for the proposed carol Professional center, ask the attorney to draw up Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and to include the additional staff comments dated 5115100. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and seconded to approve the request for annexation and zoning and have the attorney draw up the proper forms and to include the staff comments. Any further discussion? Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, question for Direc=tor Stiles. I don't see anything in Mr. Hawkins -Clark's memo about the parking island. Is that covered somewhere else in there? Stiles: It's not in a written comment; no, it's not. Nichols: Thank you. Corrie: Any further discussion? deWeerd: That was in the intent in my comments to include that as well. How about the second? McCandless: Second. Corrie: The second approves. Okay. Any further discussion? Hearing none, Mr. Berg, if you will give us the roll -call vote, please. Roll call: deWeerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird; aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 55 Corrie: Item No. 11 — *** End of Side 4 *** Corrie: Do you have something, Shari? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and council, I forgot one item on probably best with the plat. I would like Nancy to be able to answer this. Ada County Highway District's comments were that they had to provide on this road coming in off Eagle Road, they had to build half of the roadway plus 12 feet, and that's not shown. 1 mean, the — they show half the roadway, but the other 12 would be on the Kleiner property, and I was just wondering how that would be taken care of. Are you going to have to shift everything over on the plat? Can we open -- deWeerd: we're not on the preliminary plat yet. Stiles: I thought we did them all three. Corrie: We'll have to open up the preliminary plat, get your questions answered and we can close it again. Stiles: It's kind of related to the CUP. I'm sorry. Corrie: is it? Well, we can open it up right now, if you like, and get it done. Council, can we open -- Stiles: It would affect both of them if it's going to require a change. Bird: on the annexation and zoning and stuff, too, wouldn't it? or is it the CUP and preliminary plat? Stiles: Well, the annexation and zoning would just address that comment that they had to provide that, but the actual plan, I think, is where it's more — Bird: what's in the plat? Stiles: The plat and the Conditional Use Permit. 1 don't know -- Bill's annexation, too? Corrie: Mr. Nichols. Nichols: Mayor, members of the Council, I've got about two questions to answer. The annexation and zoning primarily goes to just those issues: What's the acceptable zone. The preliminary plat does address what the site's going to look like, and the conditional Use Permit, how it's going to be operated, so to speak. �r Meridian City Council Meeting May '16, 2060 Page 56 I think that's the appropriate time to cover it. Then the question can you re -open the hearing, and my answer is yes. Bird: Mr. Mayor, with that, I move that we re -open the public hearing for the preliminary plat and the Conditional Use Permit on the proposed Carol Professional Center. deWeerd: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to open up the Conditional Use Permit and preliminary plat — public hearing. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Ask the question again and we'll have it answered. Stiles: This was again addressing the roadway. I'm assuming the roadway is dedicated as part of the school site already, and I'd just like Nancy to be able to explain how they will provide the half of the roadway plus 12 feet without encroaching on the Kleiner property. Taylor: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, Shari, that's -- as far as I know as of this evening, because Jim Carberry was not around, but that the School District has already arranged for that Kleiner property. Yes. That's our understanding. So I think what we should do is just put that as a condition of the approval is that we resolve, but it's been Mr. Barnes' opinion also that the School District has that right-of-way, has acquired it. So I don't have a final answer for you, but that's what I believe to be the case. Stiles: If that roadway has been dedicated, will you include than on the plat so it's shown on that plat? Taylor: Yes, certainly. Stiles: okay. That's the only — sorry. l just — Taylor: Just a new turn of events has occurred. I know the School District's been trying to get that right-of-way, so l don't have any final information for you. That's the best that I have for you right now. Stiles: I think we can be satisfied. John Priester's not going to sign it without it being all taken care of. Thanks. Corrie: I'll entertain a motion, then, to close the public hearing. i t Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 57 Bird: So moved. Corrie: Do I hear a second? Anderson: second. i Corrie: Motion made and seconded to close the public hearing. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Then we'll go with the — do the preliminary plat first. The request for preliminary plat for Carol Professional center. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the preliminary plat for the eight lots on 5.68 acres in a proposed L -O zone for carol Professional center and for the attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and Decision of order and that the right-of-way down Kleiner's property line for the road be clarified before this is enforced and include the staff comments from 5115100 and also the escape islands or the islands, also. deWeerd : Second. Corrie: Motion's been made to accept the preliminary plat as stated on record. Any further discussion? okay. Roll -call vote, Mr. Clerk. Roll -calk deWeerd, aye; Anderson, aye; McCandless, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Now, for the request for conditional Use Permit No. 00-020 to construct eight office buildings and 6.58 acres in a proposed L -O zone for the carol Professional center. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the conditional Use Permit and for the attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and Decision of order to construct an office building on 6.68 acres in a proposed L -O zone called carol Professional center and for the staff comments dated 5/15/00 be included. Any more, Tammy? deWeerd : Second. Meridian city council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 58 Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the request for conditional Use Permit, and for the attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and include staff comments. Any further discussion? Roll -call vote, please. Rol! -call: deWeerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 13. Public Hearing VAR 00-009 Request for a variance to defer landscaping and asphalting of the parking lot for up to 24 months to allow applicant to design and construct a building in an I -L zone by James Aimonetto — 2204 E. Lanark St.: Corrie: Item No. 13 is a request for variance to defer the landscaping and asphalting of the parking lot for up to 24 months to allow applicant to design and construct a building in an I -L zone by James Aimonetto. I'll open the public hearing on VAR 00-009 and have staff comments first. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, this is for property located out in — it's off — okay, Locust Grove Industrial Subdivision. This is the site that was previously occupied by Gem State Truss. They have since moved out. The applicant is requesting a variance -- not requesting a true variance. They're asking for a variance to forego the landscaping and asphalting for up to 24 months to allow the applicant to design and construct a building. You will be seeing a Conditional Use Permit application for a temporary modular building out on the site for temporary operation up to 24 months is what they're requesting. This is where the school buses park. This would be the Meridian Academy at the end here. This is also occupied by the School District, I believe. City well site is here. The Evans Grain runs back along here. This is the drain that was also required by RC Willey to put up money for the tiling of it. When I'd met with the applicant and Boyd who was marketing the property before, the discussions were that they would install full landscaping at this time to allow the time for it to mature, and as you see in the plan they submitted, they're showing four trees. I don't know about where they're showing the gate whether that's existing or what that is. I don't believe that Ada County Highway District at this time would allow two different driveway locations if they're constructed that way. I really have a problem with these temporary buildings. We have very few building permits requested if we just allowed temporary buildings everywhere. You've personally witnessed some of those problems that we've had. But the variance — some of the things that have to be found by the City Council are that where the profit and convenience are the sole reason why the variance is requested, and I have a hard time seeing that that's not the case. That the only reason that they're asking for the variance is that they don't want to spend the money for it. So I guess I would recommend denial of the variance. I guess the applicant can make is case for other reasons. There aren't any physical reasons that the property can't be landscaped and Meridian City Council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 50 paved. Typically a variance only applies to unusual topography conditions or some problem with an existing structure that maybe doesn't meet setback requirements, those types of things. But I don't believe that this is a candidate for a variance. Corrie: Thank you. Applicant, this is a public hearing. Glencoe: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, my name is Matthew Glencoe. I am an employee of James Aimonetto and have been for four and -a -half in operating the company which he has made the purchase of this property to help sustain and move forward. As far as the issue of profit and convenience, I'm not sure that that's necessarily — I don't think that quite begins to say it. If we had a little more time, we probably wouldn't be standing here requesting a little bit of latitude in what is the normal procedure and process in building and doing all of that. The nature of our business is we distribute products for Dairygold. We have done that via two locations, one at which we have our offices, and one is actually on Dairygold's property; however, we are finding that that is limiting our abilities, our options to be able to continue to move and grow and be a successful operation both because of the separation in the two locations. Also, the nature of the relationship of Dairygold has changed substantially in the five and -a -half that we've been operating here in Boise, and we feel considerable urgency to get out from under their control and that's why we've made some very rapid decisions. So the cart may be a little before the horse, and that's why we're asking for a little bit of latitude to help us get that turned back around. It is not our intention to sit there, and I know what Shari's concern is. You're right. If everybody was allowed to put up temporary buildings, they would, but that is not what I'm asking for you to do. I'm just trying to consolidate our operation on one location to get us — but I need to do it now because to wait I might lose the opportunity entirely, and that's why we're trying to do it as we are. It's just to give us the latitude and the time that we need to put things forward. I'm not sure what else I can indicate. I did notice in the — in here there was an issue from the Fire Department about 70,000 pound capacity (inaudible) to hold up a 70,000 pound vehicle. well, you know, that was a requirement of ours before we even approached them or looking at selecting a property. I'm a little bit surprised by Shari's comments because when Mr. Boyd and I sat down with her and the question was very much one of what would the recommendation of staff be, it was, as Jim and I understood it, that it would be toward approval under the condition the understanding is a limited time frame of time for doing this. So it was given that understanding and that that we went ahead and made the purchase and proceeded so far. I'm a little bit surprised by their reaction tonight, but that's — love to have comment or question or any response that I can offer. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I've got a question for you. Up to 24 months, what kind of building are you going to put up? Meridian city council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 00 Glencoe: We will need approximately 1000, 1500 s.f. of office space, and probably about 10,000 s.f. on the roof, and at least 5,000 of that under chilled storage. Obviously if we handle dairy products, it's got to be chilled. Bird: Have you got an architect in the design process now? Glencoe: At this moment we do not. Part of it we've been waiting and pending on some of these other things as we've been moving ahead. Bird: You have purchased this ground? Glencoe: Yes. Mr. Aimonetto does own this property as of this time. Bird: Okay. Glencoe: There's a 1031 exchange involved there for — and our deadlines and that's the thing. Some decisions had to be taken. Again, that decision was based on comments and conversations that we had with staff prior to closing on the property. Bird: Okay. So basically once you get your building design and through the building process, at that time you would have your site plan and could do your landscaping and asphalting, and you — I can't imagine that being from the public's side the private side — that it's going to take 24 months if you're this pushed to get your doors open. Public, that would just be design let alone getting it built. I agree with Shari. I don't like seeing these things, but also, with the same token, I understand where you guys are coming from. I think 24 months is a little long, but I would think that to give you a variance, we could variance it until you have your site plan and can start doing that. At that point you can start laying your asphalt. In fact, if it's in the fail or something, you will even lay the asphalt before you break ground for your deal so that you can get it down. Glencoe: If I may, part of the approach is that I, as quickly as possible, wish to consolidate my operations; getting off of Dairygold's property opens up some business opportunities to me which I don't enjoy now. obviously, they have a say, they're going to say we don't want you bringing in a new supplier because you're on our property. We've made the approach that we have again so that I can as quickly as possible consolidate what we're doing, and then as soon as I've done that, begin to make the other steps that are necessary. I personally have already kind of looked at the layout of the property. I have some ideas already in my office ready to go to an architect, and, you know, that end of it as far as what I need, even if it's just an interim thing in such a way that it could easily be expanded and that sort of thing. So I don't feel that I'm really far from that, having that to you, it's just trying to clear these hurdles so that I can get off Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 61 of their site and out from under their thumb, and then be able to move on ahead. So, like I said, this is just sort of the first hurdles that I'm trying to clear before we cross the next bridges. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I have a question of legal counsel. If we did approve this variance and if this business didn't do that well — we're sitting on two years from now, and they hadn't done the things, what would be our options at that point? Nichols: Councilman Anderson, Mayor, members of the Council, unless you require some sort of letter of credit to cover the estimated cost of landscaping this area, and unless in the conditional Use Permit on the temporary structure you put some conditions in with regard to what's going to happen and when, then you can have the situation kind of strain out. There's no site pian, there are no building plans, anything at this point. So to give a 24 --month waiver, you can be 24 months and not have anything there and still temporary structure and so forth. I mean, the question if I may, Mayor, ask the applicant — Corrie: Do so because if you don't I will. Is that what you were going to ask? Nichols: Well, have you got financing for a building? Have you got -- when would you make the move? I mean, all of these things go into this sort of thing that you're asking the council. Glencoe: Financing should not be a problem given the amount of equity that we have in the property and those sorts of things. Again, the biggest push is simply to obtain occupancy. Given the way that the situation developed, we're having to do it very rapidly. You know, the landscaping and particularly the paving is just a matter of we don't know — we don't want to commit to paving and some of these things until we know that we want the building here, we know it's going to be this square footage, we know that we're going to have this much parking or we're going to lay this much asphalt. It's, again, the biggest push that we're trying to make is simply to get an occupancy of the property and to do it the legal and proper way. Then to clear these other hurdles as we go from there. I do not foresee problems with that as far as what you're indicating from financial situations and that. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, well, with your urgency, why are you two years down the road, then? Glencoe: That's what was taken under recommendation by Jim primarily, Mr. Boyd, as far as the timeframe. I guess minimum we were thinking if we sat down today with an architect that before taking occupancy the building would probably be a year by the time — it just wouldn't be a shell particularly because of the needs of the duration. That sort of thing. It was just a — what appeared to be a comfortable level. Without it being strung out internally and yet allowing enough Meridian City council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 62 time to get through all the hoops of design approvals and permits and construction. deWeerd: So would you be in favor of a lesser time which you will have needed to start the process by the time it expires? Glencoe: I don't see that. 1 probably am not the ultimate decision -maker in that regard. I would probably be willing to say that, yes, we could do that and if there's a problem, then I would know tomorrow if there were a problem or concern in that regard. deWeerd: Pretty quick. Glencoe: Yes. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I have another question along the fines of Tammy's. If we were to put a variance on, a revocable variance for one year depending upon landscaping, maybe not asphalt, one year would put you --- depending on what kind of winter, maybe you couldn't get that in, but at least within the 12 months you would have the building started. Now I don't — with a refrigeration building, l don't know. Maybe it takes a little longer to build it because you probably have to have much more (inaudible) Ac. Would you be favorable to something like that? hate hanging out two years on a variance. Glencoe: Well, the idea is that with the two years -- it wasn't two years before we get started, but it was two years to get it finished. Bird: Yeah, but the problem is if we give you a 24 -month variance, you don't have to start for twoY ears because you could start on the 23rd month. once you start — Glencoe: The thing is though, that is all against my business interest to string it out that long. Bird: I have to agree there. Glencoe: I don't want to see that any more than you do. Bird: That's why I'd be in favor of putting the year limit on it. The 12 months. Glencoe: okay. Corrie: l have a question. If I'm understanding this correctly, you're going to be putting a temporary building up there until you put your permanent building up? Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 63 Glencoe: What I need is simply an office space. Yes, the most wa expedient of p y accomplishing that is modular. The type that is typically used in construction sites. A 12 by 60 or 12 by 56, 1 guess are the true dimensions. Because I'll still need to operate out of there while the construction goes on on site. Most of my operations are movable in terms of what we're doing. We receive product, break it, put it in smaller trucks and then send that back out. Corrie: So you'll be doing this some other place other than here? Glencoe: No. That's where the urgency comes in. I should be able to do maintain operations on site even while construction is going on. Corrie: With that small of building and what you're asking for is 10,600 s.f. building? something is wrong here for me. You've got a small building and you're using it, but you need a 10,000 s.f. building to do what you want to do. Glencoe: Again, part of that is in terms of the construction isn't just based on what 11 m doing today, but what I am going to be doing in the future. inaudible little bit not based on exactly what my capacities are today with — 1 don't need a huge amount of cold storage currently because we turn our products every two days, actually, so everything that we receive on one day isg one and we're loading new stuff two days from — Monday, Wednesday and Friday. So in the y interim as we are building, it is a relatively large lot for what we need. I'm not foreseeing that as being a difficulty. Bird: what are you doing novo? what would you be doing? Leaving your product in a refrigerated semi? Glencoe: Basically. Bird: And then as you break it down and send it out, so --- actually were ' going to � � have a lot of semis sitting on that, one or two semis a week sitting on that lot, too? Glencoe: Probably two, three, four -- Bird: Because 1 have the same question the Mayor did is how -- you know, you're moving off of, you're using the cold storage of Meadow Gold. Glencoe: Actually, that is what I'm doing now. Bird: You're working out of semis? How long do the semis sit there? Glencoe: it's basically permanent. It would come and go in terms of we would pull it off the truck and take it across town to load up and we'd probably receive into it — we have straight trucks for medium duty trucks that are approximately 30 Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 64 foot on the outside. But the loads are broken down into the individual routes as they get shipped out. Bird: (inaudible) They must leave it in the semi, then. But you're only talking about one semi at a time out there? Glencoe: Probably two at a time. Bird: That is a large lot. Didn't Gem State Truss have some office buildings on there? Glencoe: They actually had exactly that. Even in the corner they had two that was right there and then the other. There was a smaller one that was facing east -west. Bird: Why'd you take it off? Glencoe: It was theirs. They took it. Bird: I knew that they had the same kind of office. They had temporary buildings for offices. Glencoe: For awhile, the cosmetics of it and such, I don't — for that matter, even in the next three months, I don't have a problem putting some landscaping in that buffer area between the street and the fencing and the other side of the fence. There are two gates in it at present that Gem State Truss used — they had a circuit through there. I don't even have a problem getting that started before ink's dry on the blueprints. Bird: I think the landscape, once you get your site thing, your site plan ran through and approved, I don't see any reason why the landscaping can't start and the asphalt at the same time. Glencoe: That is our intent. Bird: I have no other questions. Corrie: Any other questions, council? Okay. Anyone else from the public like to issue testimony? okay. I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Bird: So moved. Anderson: second. rl Meridian city council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 55 Corrie: Motion made and seconded to close the public hearing on Item No. 13. All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: I guess the question is are you convinced that the variance request is not of personal gain and also do you want to do it for 24 months? Bird: Mr. Mayor, I'd like somebody to define what personal gain is. In business you've got to have personal gain to keep your doors open. Corrie: That's not what I'm talking about. Shari. Stiles: The variance application speaks to whether the purpose is for profit or convenience. If you'll read the other parts of the variance requirements, it's pretty much a physical impossibility to comply with the Ordinance. I would also like to state that at no time did I indicate to the applicant that I would recommend approval of this. I told him all the way that it would be a hard sell and that he'd have to really try to convince council. So there was no misunderstanding. When they came in and talked to me about it, they were going to put landscaping all the way around the site, all the way around the perimeter, just do some great landscaping. We've got four trees. So I just wanted to set you straight on I'm not doing an about-face now, and it should be no surprise at all. Bird: No, it's closed. Corrie: closed public hearing, I'm sorry. Any questions? Bird: I have none. Corrie: Questions, Council? okay. Then I'll entertain a motion on the request for variance. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve a variance to defer landscaping and asphalting on the parking lot of the Gem State Truss company for up to 12 months and at that time landscaping and asphalting will e underway or this variance is revoked. Corrie: Okay, do I hear a second on the motion? Anderson: I'll second it. Corrie: Okay, motion is made and seconded to approve the variance to defer landscaping and asphalting on the parking lot for 12 months only then you must have the landscape and asphalt in, is that in? e.. Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 66 Bird: Yes. Corrie: You must have it in or the variance will be revoked. Any further discussion? All right. Roll -call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll -call: de Weerd, nay; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES Corrie: okay, three to one that you have the variance then for 12 months. Item 14. Public Hearing: Rz 00-002 Request for rezone of 76.24 acres from I -L to R-4 for all phases of Crossroads Subdivision — Y4 mile south of Fairview Avenue on the east side of Eagle Road: Corrie: Item 14 is a public hearing, request for rezone of 76.24 acres from I -L to R-4 for all phases of crossroads Subdivision, % mile south of Fairview Avenue on the east side of Eagle Road. At this time I'll open the public hearing on Item No. 14 and invite staff comments first. Stiles: This application was initiated by staff due to the fact that the entire Crossroads Subdivision is currently zoned light industrial. It's caused us a lot of problems, it's caused appraisers a lot of problems. Every time an FHA loan or HUD loan comes up in that subdivision, they call and ask us what is wrong with Meridian to approve a subdivision in that zone. So Brad Hawkins -Clark initiated it, and we've got a legal description prepared. We've proposed an R-4 zone for the entire subdivision. There are some slight variations from the R-4 zone in that they were complying with an old R-4 zone when they developed this which allowed 70 -foot frontages; however, they were still required to meet the 8,000 s.f. minimum lot size. They do have 10 percent open space within this development, and it's really just to clean up to take some workload off of us when the requests come in. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I guess I have a legal question. Doesn't that require someone to request that you change the zoning and isn't there some notification stuff that has to go on? Stiles: We did do notifications. We did public hearings, we notified everybody within the subdivision when the parcels are less than the five acres, I don't think there are any restrictions on rezoning property at the request of the City. Nichols: Councilman Anderson, Mayor, members of the Council, the City can initiate a rezone, The City has the power to do that. As long as the other requirements are met with regard to notice and also with regard to the lots which Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 07 may not meet the current subdivision requirements, they would be what's commonly called Grandfathered in as non -conforming uses with regard to those particular lots anyway. So there's no legal impediment to the rezone. Anderson: So all our legal notifications have been met with the property owners? Nichols: Councilman Anderson, Mayor, members of the Council, I haven't personally checked that, but, I mean, that's Ms. Stiles' duty to double-check all those notices and publications along with Mr. Berg who actually sends them to the newspaper. So if they say they're done, they're done. Corrie: For the record, are they done? Stiles: Yes, they are. Corrie: Thank you. Bird: Property noticed and everything? Stiles: Yes. Corrie: okay, I'll entertain a motion then to close the public hearing. Bird: So moved. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to close the public hearing. Unidentified: (inaudible) Corrie: Oh, sure you can. I'm sorry. come right up here and give us your name. Yehle: My name is Ray Yehle. I live at 3607 East congressional Drive. Corrie: Would you spell your last name for us, please. Yehle: Y-E-H--L-E. As President of crossroads Subdivision, I just want to say that most of (inaudible) there's no objection, and we're very happy to see this settled and be R-4. It gives us a better chance to enforce our covenants out there because a lot of people seeing that it has been industrial, I --L zone, they refuse to obey our covenants and so forth which are for R-4 zoning. The only thing that I have a question about: Are we including the common areas which some of those have been annexed to the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District. Meridian city council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 58 Down in the future, if they wanted to sell those common areas and so forth, we have some stipulations, but we can agree to do something with that property with the 250 homeowners who own it. If we wanted to turn it into something else so -- are we saying that the common areas are being zoned as R-4 as well as our housing areas? Right now they're all included with the R-4, I mean the I -L zoning. So that's one thing, and the other question I have is don't we have to have a residential access to that property? All our streets are commercial streets. That's the only access we have. We don't have a residential access. We used to have, but when the developer sold East Presidential Drive out to the developers, that was approved ACHD, and they turned that into a commercial street. We would not have a residential access. Harding Street could be a residential access off of Pine Street when Pine Street's developed, and if that's the case, then I would ask that one of the conditions would be in an R-4 zoning that we get a traffic signal light at Harding Street and Pine Street. That's the two questions I'm concerned with in this subdivision. Corrie: Do you want to tackle that one, Shari? Stiles: Sure. As far as the zoning, the entire subdivision would be zoned R-4. The condition of the plat was required of those common areas, so they can't be sold off and used as something else. They have to remain common area. As far as the streets, a condition of the Family Center was when they got to 450,000 s.f. of development around there that's when they'll be required to have that light in at Eagle and Pine; however, down here at Harding, it's unlikely that will be signalized. Unlikely. Well, at this time just due to -- it wouldn't warrant a signal at this time. The first locations they usually try to go at the half -mile, but that's all determined through Ada county Highway District when they do traffic counts, and they have to actually warrant that as signal as needed. It wouldn't appear at this time that it would be needed there for quite some time. Maybe something would happen when this Van Auker piece to the south of you developed depending on what kinds of volume it generated from that development, but, did that answer your question? Yehle: (inaudible) residential street access to a subdivision or not (inaudible) R-4? Stiles: No, you're not required to have a residential street access. What we call — these roads within the subdivision are called local streets, and that sets the design criteria for how wide and how it's constructed, but that's not a requirement to have a residential designation on the street in order to access your subdivision. Corrie: okay, any questions? Meridian city Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 69 Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we close the public hearing on the rezone for 76.24 acres. deWeerd : Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to close the public hearing on Rz 00-002. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say v aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: okay, request for rezone. Any other discussion? I'll entertain a motion. deWeerd: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the request for rezone of 76.24 acres from 1-L to R--4 for all phases of crossroads Subdivision and to ask the City Attorney to draw up the Findings of Facts and conclusions of Law and Decision of order. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion's been made and seconded to approve the request for rezone of 75.24 acres and have the attorney draw up the Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for the next meeting. Any further discussion? Hearing none roll -call vote, Mr. clerk. Roll -calk de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye Y MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 15. FP 00-008 Request for Final Plat approval of 50.9 acres with 164 building lots and 41 other lots in an R-4 zone for Woodbridge Subdivision by Woodbridge Community, LLC -- east side of South Locust Grove % mile south of Franklin Road: Corrie: Item No. 15 has requested to be tabled until June 6th. Anderson: Do you need a motion for that? Corrie: Yes. Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I would make a motion that we table Item No. 15 until June 6h. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to table Item th No. 15, the final plat FP 00 008, until June 5 . Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 70 aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 16. TE 00-003 Time Extension on the final plat of Cemtone Subdivision No. 4 by Becky Bowcutt Planning Services at NE Y4 Section 8, T3 N, R'l E (west of Hickory Avenue between Pine and State) : Corrie: Item No. 18 is a time extension on the final plat for oemtone Subdivision No. 4 by Becky Bowcutt Planning Services at NE % Section 8, T3N, R1 E, west of Hickory Avenue between Pine and State. Becky bailed out on us? Okay. Do you want to take it over? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, this is for the property that's located just west of the Blue Cross facility. Here's Blue Cross here. As I explained earlier, their initial final plat that they submitted for this included all of Pine Avenue, and the final plat was approved with Pine Avenue on the plat. Then they submitted a revised final plat that took out all of Pine Avenue. The Council instructed Ms. Bowcutt to go back to the original plan and get that done. They — the finalp to lat they originally submitted would have had to have been recorded by May 4 this year. I guess they're requesting a one-year extension. I don't know if that meets with the plans to extend what we would like to have the time for Pine to extend. But I guess the Council could approve either a one-year or a lesser time if that was your desire. Corrie: I guess my question is why a year? Stiles: Pardon? Corrie: Why a year? I mean, just keep the plat and do it right. Stiles: They can request up to a year. That's the maximum. Corrie: That's what they're requesting? Bird: Their letter doesn't say that. Stiles: It doesn't ask for any time. Corrie: Okay, take a look and see what it says here. (inaudible) give them ten days, I guess. Was there any indication of what she needed or wanted other than a year and why? Stiles: She didn't ask. Apparently they're trying to market it to whomever might purchase the property, and I guess — Meridian city Council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 71 *** End of Side 5 *** Stiles: -- even if you made it ten days, they can let it lapse and just start over. So one way or the other I guess it really doesn't matter for the time. Corrie: okay, council, make your decision. Are you recommending a year? Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we allow the time extension on the preliminary and final plat on Gemtone Sub No. 4, NE Y4 Section 8, T3N, RIE, west of Hickory . ry Avenue between Pine and State for six months. deWeerd: Second. Corrie: Thank you. Motion's been made and seconded to extend the time on TEOo-004, Gemtone Subdivision for approval of six months' extension. Any other comments? Roll -call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll -calk de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; Bird, aye MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 17. Amendment of ordinance No. 857: Az 99-024 Request for annexation and zoning of 20.05 acres to I -L by Albertson's, Inc. — east of Eagle Road, north of the railroad tracks and south of Settler's canal: Corrie: Item No. 17, Amendment of ordinance No. 857, Az 99-024, request for annexation and zoning of 20.05 acres to I -L by Albertson's, Inc., east of Eagle Road, north of the railroad tracks and south of Settler's canal. That's housekeeping, isn't that correct? Need to make that change in the wording. It needs to be west instead of east. It should be east, not west; is that right, Mr. Attorney? Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, there was an error in the legal description which was not caught until after the ordinance was already done. I can't — it may have been the Assessor's Office that caught it. At any rate, we need to pass this with the correct legal description in place. Corrie: Mr. clerk, if you'll read the Ordinance No. 857 by title only, please. is that okay? fro we need to do that? Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. The State Tax Commission notified us that the legal description did not close; in other words, it was open, so they sent it back to us. So that's why we have to amend this ordinance with the correct legal f Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 72 description. Amended ordinance No. 857: An ordinance finding that certain land lies contiguous or adjacent to the city limits of the city of Meridian, county of Ada, State of Idaho; and finding that the owner has made a request for annexation in writing to the council; and that said land be annexed to the city of Meridian and zoning made light industrial district, 1-L; and declaring that said land by proper legal description described below be a part of the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho; repealing all Ordinances, Resolutions, Orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith; and directing the City Engineer to add said property to the official maps of the City of Meridian, Idaho; and directing the Clerk of the city of Meridian to file a certified copy of the Ordinance and the map of the areas to be annexed with the Ada County Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and the State Tax commission of Idaho pursuant to Idaho Code Section 50-223 and Section 63-2215. Corrie: Okay, you've heard the reading of the amended Ordinance No. 857 by title only. Is there anyone from the public that would like to have the Ordinance read in its entirety? Okay, hearing none, I'll entertain a motion on the amended Ordinance No. 857. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the amended Ordinance No. 857 for the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the amended Ordinance No. 857 for the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 18. Tabled from May 16, 2000: Water, Sewer and Trash Delinquencies: Corrie: Item 18, tabled from May 16, 2000, water, sewer and trash delinquencies. This is to inform you in writing if you choose to you have the right to a predetermined hearing at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, May '16th, 2000, before the Mayor and city council to appear in person to be judged in the facts and defend a claim made by this city that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on May 17th unless payment is received in full. is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? Yes, Mr. Clerk. Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Just a follow-up on the gentleman that came to our meeting last meeting on May 2nd that has a 60 -day extension because of HUD and the process of buying the property. His name is Michael Kohntopp at Blue Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 73 Heron Street, and he asked me to talk to the attorney about a 60 -day extension and felt that in that 60 days either HUD would pay or he would agree to pay it. can give you the account number 34-0830-1 in the amount of $292.59. Bird: Mr. Mayor, what's the reasoning? Who was the water — who was living there? Who owns the property? Who was the previous owner? Nichols: Mr. Bird, Mayor, members of the Council, from talking with this fellow last time, if I recall correctly, he bought this through a HUD foreclosure, and the title company did not pick up the delinquent water account when he closed the sale, and so he's got a commitment from HUD or their in the process since they were the quote, owners, they were going to have to pay that and said if he couldn't get them to pay it, he would. He just didn't want to have his water shut off in the meantime. First time in any of these meetings that somebody appeared on one of these. Bird: The only question that I've got, Council members, is I don't know who the title company was or who closed it or anything, but I think that they should come right forward. I mean, we're not in the banking — I realize that $292.59 isn't that much, but we're not in the banking business for sixty days. HUD don't let you have 60 days to pay them. The amazing thing is we've already paid our subcontractor that did the trash, and then, like I say, it's not — you're not talking about a large amount, but, you know, this month happens to be pretty good, but other months we've had quite a large accounting of what needs to be turned off. don't know. Nichols: Another issue, Mayor, members of the Council, is that M U BS is trying to get the title work on these to call them every time they have a sale and (inaudible) so that we can try to pick up some of these that have slipped in the past so that — I have talked with Leslie and her staff about doing that, and so they're working on improving that part so that it doesn't happen. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I've got one question for Mr. Nichols. What would be the amount of money that would be feasible to file the lien and how — like the water, how long do you have before you can file a lien? Nichols: Councilman Bird and Mayor, members of the Council, one thing that I've got to look at is it's been a long time since I've looked at the case, but there's an Idaho Court case that came out of the City of Grangeville over delinquent sewer and water accounts, and I think that the result of that was that you couldn't lien the property. You could just deny the service. So I'd want to look at that before l could answer your question. Bird: I understand that. Do you need a motion? Meridian City council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 74 Corrie: I need a motion to approve the delinquency turn-offs and then another motion to — Bird: Do you want two or can it be one's Corrie: I think it better be two. We can do the second one a 60 -day extension to Michael Kohntopp. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would make a motion that we approve the delinquency for turn-off schedule for 6117100. Bird: I second that. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the delinquency turn --off list for 6117100. All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Corrie: Now I'll entertain a motion for the request for extension to have HUD pay the bill or he'll pay it in 60 days. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would make a motion to grant the extension for Mr. Michael Kohntopp, 984 East Blue Heron Street, for an extension for him to pay the water bill or HUD to pay the bill. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the 60 -day extension on the Account No. 34-0830-1. All those in favor say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Item 19. Department Reports: A. city Treasurer — Janice Smith: 2. Refund of Latecomers: Corrie: Tammy, I guess. We need to -- Janice is first. We need to have a motion for the refund approval on the one that she gave us. Bird: On the latecomers. Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the latecomers refund of $267,635.09. Anderson: Second. Meridian City Council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 75 Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the latecomers refund in the amount of $257,535.09. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 3. LID —'1535 East 1st Street, $2,070.14: Corrie: There's another one here about Ll Ds. vary, are you going to present that one to us? Smith: I'm sorry, what was that? Corrie: Well, I'm hearing conversation down at the end there. On this LID, I guess Terry Woodward that she's asking that we work with the attorney and put a lien on that property? okay. And then the hearing department is making some changes on No. 11, Tammy Shoemaker? They're working on a payment schedule? Smith: Right. I've got to get that squared away with Tammy Shoemaker. Corrie: I guess we need a motion, then, to have the attorney follow up with State Code and attach a lien to the property tax if not received by the end of June of this year. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we instruct the attorney to proceed with a lien on property No. 15 which is Terry Woodward, 1535 East Vt Street, for the $2,070.14 if payment is not received by June 30, 2000, for LID. deWeerd: Second. Corrie: okay, motion is made and seconded to have the attorney draw up the proper papers to put a lien on the property if payment is not received by June 30 by Mr. Woodward. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES B. city councitperson - Tammy deWeerd: 1. Tabled from May 2, 2000: Pathway Master Plan Committee l Sub -Committee of Parks and Recreation Commission: Corrie: Tammy. Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 76 deWeerd: well, this hasn't changed any since you saw it on May 2"d; although, Nancy does have a last name. It's Gardner, O -A -R -D -N -E --R. The timeliness of this pathway sub -committee has been seen just as early as tonight with Tarawood Subdivision and the need for a plan so that we can ask developers to participate in seeing that it happens. Also, I know Nampa Meridian has made comments at COMPASS meetings about wanting cities that want to work with them to have a master plan. So it is a very timely issue. I did get this to you two weeks ago. I did get a comment just tonight about one of the committee members that he was opposed to. I wish 1 would have had the comments before I took it to the Parks Commission yesterday, but if anyone is opposed to any of these members, please let me know and we can take them off. Corrie: Let me clarify something here. I told Tammy, Jan deWeerd, I really wasn't paying any attention to it. I guess I should have. But on Jan deWeerd, It's Tammy's husband. 1, at one time, put my son on a committee, sub- committee, and I caught all kinds of flack. I just don't want Tammy to go through that because I know that you will, but that's your choice. That's the only reason. I had nothing against Jan. It's going to cause some — maybe it won't, but it sure did when I did it back earlier, and that's the only reason that I didn't want you to do it. You guys can do what you want, but I thought I'd just better let Tammy know that there may be some flack on that. I don't know who it will be, but it did on mine. That's the only reason I say that. Bird: Is this the one —actually, this is an (inaudible). Corrie: I wouldn't think so. Bird: They're working under the Parks and Recreation Commission, aren't they? Corrie: Correct me if I'm wrong, Tammy, but they'd make the recommendations to the Parks and Recreation Commission and you come back with the recommendation to the Council; is that correct? deWeerd: That is correct. They're only ad hoc. We're directing with the Commission and the Commission (inaudible) for any recommendations through the liaison which is ad hoc. Corrie: Does anybody have any problems with anyone on here? Anderson: I don't have any objections, and I don't know what the possible conflict could be, but there could be those that gripe. How hard was it to find people to get on this committee? Was it hard? Did we turn people away? deweerd: No. Meridian City council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 77 Anderson: I think if we turn people away and then your husband shows up, then we're probably going to have some problems. deWeerd: No. I had to go out and recruit. Actually he said with the pathways y we have in Holland (sic), you guys might be able to utilize my expertise. Corrie: Okay. Does anybody have any objections to these people? I'moin to g g leave it up to you. I just don't want to see you hurt. okay. Are you through? They can — okay. C. City Engineer— Gary Smith 1. Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project Change order No. 2: Corrie: You're up. Smith: There's a memo that I sent to you that has the three different items attached to it. Brad Watson prepared a little dissertation outlining what these three items concern. The first item is the Change Order No. 2 for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility. It had to do with applying a waterproof coating to the inside of the masonry walls of the restroom, centrifuge and polymer rooms. It wasn't included in the original specifications, but after they got to that point, staff realized that it was going to be necessary in order to facilitate washdown in the area. once that equipment was in operation. So we did authorize because it was — had to be done before the equipment was installed, there was some facility equipment being attached to the walls, and so we went ahead and authorized the cost ahead of the approval by city Council in order to facilitate the construction process. And the amount that the contractor bid to us was less than what we and our consulting engineer estimated that it would cost, so we felt that the price was reasonable, and that's why we proceeded with that. Do you have any questions concerning change Order No. 2 for the Biosolids Dewatering Facility? Bird: No. Smith: Our recommendation would be for your official approval of Change Order No. 2 Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the Dewatering facility Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $5,200. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $5,200. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. r Meridian city council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 78 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 2. WWTP Trunk Sewer — Creason Lateral Crossing change order No, 1: Smith: Second item has to do with the crossing of the Creason Lateral, also a Change order to that contract with Brown Construction. This contract involved installing a casing pipe under the Creason Lateral ahead of the irrigation water for this season, and the casing pipe is going to carry a 35 -inch diameter sewer trunkline that will be constructed across property that's being developed by Ed Bews' mini -storage facility. It will ultimately be connected to the White Drain sewer. Once the contractor began finishing up the crossing, it was found that we needed to install more concrete in the channel of the Creason Lateral to line it as required by Nampa Meridian Irrigation District than what was originally bid. This was because of the steep bank of the south bank of the lateral. Steeper than what was shown, what we originally depicted on the drawings. So there was an additional $2999 involved in concrete lining and riprap (sic) at each end of the liner that the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District required after the fact on the riprap also. As Brad noted, the bid that we received from Brown was substantially less than what the second bidder bid to us, and so we don't have a problem with this request for Change order No. 1. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I would make a motion that we approve change Order No. 1 on the Creason Lateral in the amount of $2999 for additional concrete work and riprap that was required. deWeerd: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the Change Order No. 1 for the Creason Lateral Crossing in the amount of $2999. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 3. Year 2000 Sewer Line cleaning 1 TV Inspection Project Contract Award: Smith: Thank you, council. The last item is the contract, bid results for a contract that we have for Year 2000 sewer cleaning and TV inspection sewer lines. We had two bid plan holders, but only one submitted a bid, and that is the Municipal Services company, Inc., who has been doing our work for us for the past four or five years. The bid amount was $37,644.10; the unit prices that they submitted are less than what they had submitted to us on previous projects. We think that it had to do with the fact that there was another plan holder who had Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2666 Page 79 been very aggressive in bidding against this contractor in Boise for some similar types of work. So we would, based on the results of that bid, we would recommend award of the project to Municipal Services Company, Inc., in the amount of $37,644.'16. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the contract with Municipal Services Company for the sewer, 2666 sewer cleaning, TV inspection project for the sum of $37,644.10 and for the Mayor to sign and the clerk to attest. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the 2666 sewer line cleaning and TV inspection project in the amount of $37,644.10 and the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES D. Mayor Robert D. Corrie: �. Accident Insurance: Carrie: I've got a couple things here that I didn't get on yours. one is the insurance for the volunteer firefighters that Pauline gave us about AFLAC. American Heritage. Ron. 1 guess I'll let you speak to that. Anderson: I just got to talk with Pauline briefly in the breakroom there= and she was going to get me a breakdown of the price quotes that they got and how they did the comparison on the coverages, but the committee recommended that they go with AFLAC to simply better coverage, slightly a little more money than the American Heritage, but that's what committee recommended. I wouldn't have any reason to go against what our employee committee would recommend there. I guess I would recommend that we approve purchasing the (inaudible) insurance from AFLAC. deWeerd: Is that a motion? I second it. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to use AFLAC for the volunteers and the City employees for the insurance. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES 3. Resolution { Meridian City council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 80 Corrie: one other. There was a resolution that was going to be drawn up for approval tonight on the Police Department and pay scale. Found some discrepancies in that in both areas, the Fire Department and also the Police Department. Do you want him to re --do it? What do you want him to say? How do you want him to say it? Do you want him to bring it back to you on the 23rd? Anderson: 1'd like to have it re -done so that we're looking at it accurate. Bird: We need it put to rest, though. Corrie: I think if we do it the 23rd we'll still get it in line -- Bird: The 23rd is our workshop. Corrie: I think it's a special meeting, too. Bird: You're right. deWeerd: And the recycling program. McCandless: Keith, don't we have a meeting workshop on the 25th also for goals? Bird: Yes, the 25th. Anderson: We forgot to let Will know when we were in that meeting when we were finishing the Executive Session. McCandless.- What time is it? Bird: The 25th? That's just a workshop. p McCandless: What time? deWeerd: Six o'clock. Bird: Six o'clock is great with me on the 25th, Corrie: Got that, Will? Berg: Mr. Mayor, I just wanted to make some things clear. On the 23rd we have a workshop. Corrie: We also have a special meeting. Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 81 Berg: Yes. on this workshop at whichever time we decide to have it, we're g , going to have a budget software presentation, we re going to have the Fire g g Department evaluation. At 7:00 we have a special meeting for the recycling p ublic hearingand for the Development Agreement for the Murdoch -Howell property plus an ordinance for annexation. Then you can go back to whatever p else you want for your workshop. Those are the critical things. deWeerd: Like the Finance Director? Bird: We'veg of that, and we need to work on that. Everybody got a copy of that. You'veg of a full agenda unless you want to stay here half the night again. are you Berg: Then having a workshop on the 25th at 6:00. � y � Corrie: Which isg oafs only. We decide how we're going to do the Department Heads meeting. Bird: Also Mr. g, Mayor, l ave you guys a copy of our proposals from the banks y , regarding our financing. 1'd like to look that over and see what you think. I'd like g g g to discuss that. Also, Lombard Conrad came back with a new bid. l believe the chiefeve of that to body; the new prices for drawings, chief. You got that to g everybody; everybody? Lombard Conrad's new deal? Corrie: Yes, he did because I did it for him. Bird: Anyway, a , we need to look that over. There are some things we need to make our decision on and get going on. So take a look at it and see if we can't decide. okay. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, members of the council, the resolution on overtime was my stab apparently, ill- laced stab at trying to have a thing that you can focus on. � can see l made an error with regard to the firefighters with what's in their contract. That's easy to fix. But it would help me if you would tell me what you want me to do on the rest of it. I feel pretty confident about the court -time for the law enforcement personnel, but on Item B with regard to those see, I broke it between a 10 -hour shift and the 8 -hour shift, and I know the chief has some concerns about a breakdown that way. I just need to --- if you're going to tell me to change or not to change, I'd be pleased to change it and send it back to you . McCandless: Somehow, Bill, they need to be the same. You can't pit one group of officers against another. That's what that's doing. In other words, if the 8 -hour officersof 40 hours a week and they went 42 hours, then they get paid 2 hours g overtime. if they took next week off for a weeks, vacation and then the following week they came back and get paid overtime for whatever they worked overtime Meridian city council Meeting May 15, 2000 Page 82 on that week, with 150 hours in 28 -day period, they don't have that advantage. Do you see what I mean? Nichols: I understand, and I recall one council member commenting on something less than the FLSA standard of 171 hours and having it at 150 hours in a 28 --day period. So what I'm saying is I'm asking the council to tell me whether it's all of the sworn officers at 150 hours in a 28 -day period or all of the officers on a 40 -hour in a 7 -day period. Anderson: We've got to find that deal and look at what number you put in there. We could probably figure out --- Bird: It's 150, Ron, on a 28 -day. I thought we had decided at that point that — weli, I think you -- Nichols: Caution. You just didn't decide anything. You all stated your comments. Bird: Right. We didn't decide a thing. McCandless: We agreed on 150 hours in a 28 -day period. Bird: 150 hours in a 28 -day period, and I thought that included the 40 -hour people, too. McCandless: I did too. Bird: I didn't think we separated them. Anderson: Well, if they're working 10 -hour days, but they're only working 4 of those, it would actually equate to the same thing as an 8 -hour employee working 5 days. Corrie: But here's the kicker here. Like she said,' if they take a week's vacation in between that time and they come back, you're only going -Y- they're only going to get paid if they're working a 7 -day period and 40 hours. You're penalizing one group and you're not another. So you have to do it equally for all of them. You either go all of them at Ivo hours in 28 -day period whether it's an 8 -hour or a 10 - hour or do them all on a 40 -hour regardless of what it is. So you have to clear that up. Bird: Mr. Mayor, 1 thought we had cleared it up that all sworn officers which included the 5 -day, 8 -hour day shifts worked on 150 hours in a 28 -day cycle. Anderson: And the 8 -hour employees work off of a 40 -hour. Meridian City council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 83 Bird: Non -sworn. McCandless: Yes. The non -sworn. Bird: Because sworn officers work their 40 hours in a 5 -day period. They're based on the 160. That's the way I understood it. Corrie: So if you worked a week and you took a week off, then you wouldn't ��/++y]Jet �+ any overtime. only if you worked overtime hours in that week. Bird: No, it's if you work over — now, Ron, you're going right back to what the Mayor just said. We're separating. Non -sworn. All sworn officers, whether they work the 40 --hour, 5 -day week or whether they work the 10 -hour shifts, the 4 10 - hour shifts are paid based on 28 days, 160 hours. Right? Isn't that what — this is what I understood. Then all non -sworn personnel work on 40 -hour week. okay. That's the way I understood it, Bill. I didn't think — I thought we said we weren't going to make it different for non -sworn officers. They're all going to be on the same basis as all the other city employees are. Corrie: Non -sworn. Bird: The sworn officers were on the same program, too, whether they worked the 8 -hour or the 10 -hour shifts. McCandless: What I'm concerned about is having them all the same. Bird: Having them all the -- McCandless: Having the sworn officers all the same. Corrie: It would be 160 hours. Bird: They are all the same. McCandless: No, they weren't under the -- Bird: That's the way I understood it, Cherie. I think that's what Ron had stated that all sworn officers were based on a 28 -day, 160 hours. Anderson: I may have said that (inaudible) 8 hours versus 10 hours. Bird: And we meant that whether it was a 10- or 8 -hour shift, if you were a sworn officer, you worked under 28 days, 160 hours. Am I not right? Isn't that what was discussed? Meridian city council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 84 Nichols: Let me see if I can bring this to some closure, if I may, members of the Council. First of all, let me fess up. I have now officially failed mind-reading. With regard to this particular resolution, if under sworn law enforcement personnel, if it simply says all time worked in excess of 160 hours within 128 -day period not including any paid leave such as sick leave, vacation, et cetera, shall be compensation at a rate of 1-112 times the regular hourly rate of pay. That's it for the sworn people. Then under C, it's all other non-exempt personnel including non-exempt, unsworn law enforcement, it means public works, it means MUGS, all the other non-exempt people are on a 40 -hour, 7 -day period. is that the direction? McCandless: Can we have Bili talk for just a minute? Gordon: I thought the original idea was to make everybody in the City the same. If you hold police officers to 160 hours before they get time and -a -half, they're not the same as your non -sworn personnel. You're holding everybody else to 40 hours before they get overtime, but you're holding the police officers to 160 before they get overtime. Anderson: And that's the same thing that FLSA does — they do it 171 hours. They've come to the conclusion that there's a different how police and fire work. We've gone through this umpteen times in there with HR and payroll and with you, and that's what we've come to. Do we have to keep arguing this point over and over? Gordon: Ron, you don't have to argue anything. You make the decision. I'm telling you that if you go the 160, you're causing me a morale problem. I'll do what you tell me to do, but 1 think you're wrong, and I think time will prove that. Anderson: Maybe so. Gordon: You guys make your decision. I've had my say, and I'm like you. I'm tired of arguing. Just make it. Let's move on. Anderson: we think it's a compromise. We didn't go with the FLSA at 171 hours. we were more lucrative than that, but we didn't set it that they were getting paid overtime on each shift, and we didn't make it to 40 -hour. we made it 160. Gordon: And I explained to you — Anderson: There are people that will disagree with that. No doubt. t Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 86 Gordon: The reason they came up with that 171 hours was for the smaller departments. The same with the fire with the 212. They did that because when they first enacted Fair Labors and Standards, small departments with 10, 15 officers could not cover their shifts. You've got to cover 24-hour, 7 days a week. Firemen, it's easy. You go 24r -hour periods. Police officers don't do that. So they made the exception that 171 hours. That's why they did that. The fact that police officers are different, yeah, they are. So are the firemen. You work different shifts. But when you reach a certain point when I can't cover shifts, that 171 hours is really a moot point. You can do that, but it's not being fair. What you're doing is you're penalizing police officers. You're holding them to a higher standard now on time. They get to work longer than your average lawnmower driver. Anderson: I don't think that's -- Gordon: Forty hours overtime. Bird: Forty hours on 28 days, that's 40 hours within a 7 -day week. Anderson: It's based off a 40 -hour week consistently, then they'll get overtime. Bird: If they're working overtime throughout their weeks, their four weeks, they'll get overtime. The only thing I can't see is why they're special to the point that worked today my 10 -hour shift. 1 take tomorrow off for half a day, get called in for six hours, but I've been off with vacation or something, but I get two hours overtime in that shift. That's the (inaudible) -- Gordon: No. That's what was (inaudible). What I'm saying is your regular 40 - hour employees, they can work 41 hours this week, and they get overtime for 1 hour. If you take a police officer, he works 48 hours this week, he takes vacation next week, he doesn't get overtime for that eight hours for this 28 -day period, not for the week. Anderson: That's right. Gordon: And you think that's even and fair? Anderson: 1 do. You take time off and you're taking vacation or whatever, and yes, I think that's fair. Gordon: Your 40 -hour employees don't do that. They get overtime for that week. Anderson: We just talked about all the differences throughout this. Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Page 86 Gordon: Well, like I say, you guys — I'm done arguing. You guys are causing me — you're going to cause some morale problems, and that's all I've got to say. Corrie: You've made the decision here. one thing — do we — no, you haven't made the decision. Sorry. Now, I've got a thing I've got to sign tomorrow that is going to go in effect the first of June, and they're going to pay all the overtime and everything else like they said before. Okay. So they're going to get all the — whatever they had before until June 15#. Bird: February, March, April -- what was it? McCandless: March, April and May. Bird: February, March, April and May, right? Corrie: And then they haven't been paid that yet. Gordon: That's correct. Corrie: That's the one that we'll be signing to make sure that gets done. okay. You understand where we are? Nichols: Given the fact that it's 20 to 1:00, 1 believe so. Corrie: Anything else? Bird: I move that we adjourn. deWeerd: Just a couple of things, Mr. Mayor. Jeff Wasson, he's the guy that complained about the light shining in his house. I did go look at them, and he asked us to, right? Did anyone else? Anderson: I did. deWeerd: You don't think they shine up too far? 1 think that one shield -- out. Okay. if the shield that is covering the light by Meridian Floral were put on it, it's just a simple piece of steel. Put on the rest of those and they would shine down and stili light up that area enough for security reasons, and I think he had mentioned that right off the bat when he started talking about it. I don't see why the — *** End of Side 6 *** Meridian City Council Meeting May 10, 2000 Page 87 Anderson: --- some security issues there, but I think the downcast light would still provide enough light for security and wouldn't cast so much light back into the neighborhood. But with all them fixtures in the back (inaudible). deWeerd: Or just surrounded by that piece of metal. Or there was one that had a lot dimmer light to it that wasn't so offensive, so I guess that would be the real easy way.Why thejust can't put those simple three -sided steel covers over it, v y that seems like it'd be fairly easy. Edinburgh Subdivision — are we going to ignore that letter? Corrie: we're notg oing to ignore it, but (inaudible) time. They didn't get it back. It's a different setup. So the Council will have to look at it the 6 th of June. deWeerd: I'd just like to remind everyone about the Chamber auction on you . Saturdav y going? Are oin ? And the AIC meeting, we need to fill those out and get them in to Will? Anderson: Do we have to elect a delegate to be our lead person there? deWeerd: How's everyone getting up there? Corrie: I'm driving p, so you ou can drive up with me. I'm going back Saturday. If everybody would like to (inaudible) Anderson: inaudible elect a delegate, and that's why I didn't know (inaudible) Corrie: You don't have to, but would you like to be a delegate? Anderson: We'll all be there anyway. (inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Corrie: I will venture a guess that you will (inaudible) — all those in favor of adjournment say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES MEETING ADJOURNED AT 12:45 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVE: Meridian City Council Meeting May 16, 2000 Paae--88 T D. CORRIE 7070� KIM.�• _ . _ . I MAYOR ATTEST: ROBERT D. CORRi E, MAYOR of ikw SEAL 00 Q7J :t ATTEST: ILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CI CLERK May 11, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 16, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer -GarySmith ITEM NO. 1�.� � Z REQUEST WWTP Trunk Sewer - Creason Lateral Crossing Change Order No. 1 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: See attached CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION.: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the city of Meridian. May 11, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 1 6, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer Ga rySmith ITEM NO. � REQUEST Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project Change Order No. 2 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Materials presented at public meetings shall became property of the City of Meridian. 1CORDED-REQUEST r. ACA COUHTY RECORDER 10Alx A� 0. FES DEPUT � 206D MY 18 P H : 4 3 100038152 MERIDIAN CITY CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 857 AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT CERTAIN LAND LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; AND FINDING THAT THE OWNER HAS MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION IN WRITING TO THE COUNCIL; AND THAT SAID LAND BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (I -L); AND DECLARING THAT SAID LAND, BY PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BE A PART OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID PROPERTY TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO; AND DIRECTING THE CLERIC OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASURER AND ASSESSOR, AND THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE SECTION 50- 223 AND SECTION 63-2215. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1, FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a Written request for annexation to the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the owner of said Property to -wit: A parcel of land being a portion of the South half of Section 9, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point marking the Southwest corner of Section 9, T.3N., R.IE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho; thence North 00°00'00" East along the Westerly boundary of said Section 9, 1,298.53 feet to a point, said point being on the extension of the Southerly boundary line of Commerce Park Subdivision as recorded in Book 45 of Plats at page ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-024) - 1 3 721, records of Ada County; thence leaving said Westerly boundary, South 8 9°5 63 0" East along said extension and said Southerly boundary, 1,348.75 feet to a point marking the Southwesterly corner of Lot 4, Block 1, of said subdivision and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00°04'51" West along the Westerly boundary of said Lot 4, 479.96 feet to a point on the center line of Commercial Court; thence North 89'56'23" East along said center line, 386.72 feet to a point on the Easterly boundary of Commerce Park Subdivision; thence leaving said center line North 00°04'51" West, 409.06 feet along said Easterly boundary to a found iron pin on the Southerly right-of-way of the Settler 7s Canal; thence South 66°39'26" East along said right-of-way, 511.24 feet to a found iron pin; thence North 89019'55" East along said right-of-way, 458-56 feet to a found iron pin; thence leaving said right-of-way South 00°41'21" East, 690.83 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence South 89056'18" West along said railroad right-of-way, 1,321.69 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 20.05 acres, more or less. This description is based upon found monuments and record information. SECTION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby annexed and made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian hereinabove described shall be zoned Light Industrial District (I -L). SECTION 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-024) -- 2 SECTION 5: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 6: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 7: The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner plainly and clearly designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian, including the lands herein annexed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho, all in compliance with Idaho Code §63-2215 and §50-223. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of 1hag 2000. 17 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this L6 day of , 2000. iz YL YOR t� �{tttl11 T1ftlllll Lr4�� 0 '}r tri �r 1 SP Z it, L r 0 OUNV s. ANNEXAT I CN AND ZONING CRDINANCE (AZ -99-024) - 3 STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada. ) On this day of � C. 20007 before me, the undersigned, a 7 Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. r Mr i s pmt 1�■ (SEAL) s .46, ;Mlr -400 t 41POF IV O* �anal%$ ey1Z:\Work1MlMeridian 15 3 60M\A1bertsons\AZ. ORD e NOT Y PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: ��Gi.6(,(,�t, /;D MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: q a6 -0D ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-024) - 4 •--T ��r�J�'��+iYJ��:.�r'J�r� D r {1 s � i i� i ✓< • f r ! I i If I •--T ��r�J�'��+iYJ��:.�r'J�r� • ��F..rrr�wrrrr— rr�—s—rr�---..ter--.---.rr�. EAGLE RD r wmm wr rr mono* ON-* wpm r r rr r r OEM M� 0=0 M Z 1 i ✓< • f ! I i If I I1 # I I +I 1 f I I ! f II 1 1 1 11 I f II t I i r # li i t 1 # I I r r l# � II 1 1 1 F � 1 1 I I 1 II # 1 + � # It I + 1 11 T r � i Iii 1 # z * M + i i I i N. CCO"c 4 6' PJ. 4If'. lG "0 jl 1 # w 6� , 4� do= r Amn OEM r C �,Q �y 045!•IJ.40Jsem411 # r � I 1 1 � ` 1 1 i 1 I + ' W + Im I t f . r } iE l I I i , .l May 11, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 16, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer w Gary Smith ITEM NO. REQUEST Year 2000 Sewer Line Cleaning I N Inspection Project Contract Award AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. r E 0 J To: Mayor Corrie I %xii sin ary D. Smith, PE CC: Dates 05/11 /00 Ria: City Council Agenda Mayor: Here is a memo from Brad Watson outlining three items that we request be placed on the May 16 City Council meeting agenda for their action. 1. Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project Change order No.2. 2. WWTP Trunk Sewer — Creason Lateral Crossing Change Order No. 1. 3. Year 2000 Sewer Line Cleaning 1 TV Inspection Project Contract Award. Brad has attached supporting documentation for Mayor and Council review to aid in the decision making process. Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve each of these three items. Thank you, Gary Smith From the desk of... Ga D SnfiM PE Meridian City Engineer Meridian Public Warks Departrfft .200 E. Carlton St, Suite 100 MendiaA idabo 83642-2600 Page 1 (208) 887-2211 Fax (M8) 887-12W To: Gary From: Brad Watson, P. E. CC: File Date: 05/11/00 Re: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS FOR 5116100 MEETING -1) Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project 2} WWTP Trunk Sewer -- Creason Lateral Crossing, 3) Contract Award for Y2000 Sewer Cleaning/TV Inspection Bid The following are three items for City Council approval. 1 ] Biosolids Dewatering Facility Project Change Order No. 2. This is proposed Change Order No. 2 for applying water -proof coating to the interior masonry walls of the restroom and centrifuge and polymer rooms in the amount of $5x200.00. Coating was not included in the original specifications but wastewater staff realized R would be facilitate wash -down of the rooms once the centrifuge and polymer rooms were in operation. As you know, Turn -Key, Inc. is the general contractor. Carollo Engineers, our inspector Ed Ankenman and I all reviewed the cost and quantity of work and agreed that the price was reasonable. This coating covered approximately 5,000 square feet of wall area. 2} WWTP Trunk Sewer --- Creason Lateral Crossin Chan -q Order No. 1. This is the first and only change order for this project. Brown Construction is requesting an additional $2,999,00 for extra concrete work that was done on lining the Creason Lateral and rip -rap at each end of the liner. Because the south bank of the lateral was not 450 as shown on the plans, and more closely was vertical, they needed much more concrete to achieve the configuration shown on the plans. Also, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District required the addition of rip -rap and both ends of the lining according to Richard Brown. It should be noted that Brown quoted $23,x"02 and the only other quote was from Irminger Construction for $43,306. 1 believe Brown substantially under -bid the project for us to begin with. Brown completed this extra work under a very tight time frame and did a satisfactory job. From the desk of... 3} Y2000 Sewer Cleaning/TV In ection Prooect Contract Brad Wabon, P.E. Award. We received only one bid for this project. Municipal Assistant Cid Engineer Services Company, Inc., who completed the last three similar Meridian Public Works Department p 200 E. Carlton St, Suite 104 Meridian, Idaho 83642-2600 (208)897-2211 Fax: (248) 887-1297 0 Page 1 wat{sanb�7a ci.meridiamidus projects for us, hid $37,644-10 . The unit prices in this hid are lower than those for previous projects. This project is only about half of what the previous three year's projects have encompassed. Most of the lines to be cleaned in this project are somewhat newer subdivision lines according to Fred Putzier. Thank you. Let me know if you have any questions. 0 Page 2 < cor nG inoLLo Contract Change order No. 002 City of Meridian Biosolids Dewatering Project March 31, 2000 Owner: City of Meridian Contractor: Turn -Key, Inc. Engineer: Carollo Engineers THE CONTRACT SHALL BE CHANGED AS FOLLOWS Dedicated to creative, responsive, quality solutions for those we serve. WO# 4504A.20 Item No. Description of Changes and/or Days Added to Increase in Additions Contract Contract Price Cost 1 Coating Interior of Dewatering Building 7 $ 5,200,00 Original contract amount. $1,164,734.00 Net change by previous change orders. 10,081.08 Contract amount prior to this change order. 11174,815.08 Net increase, decrease due to this change order. 5,200,00 New contract .amount, including this change order. $1,180,015.08 The amounts indicated above shall be compensation in full for the work described and shall include all costs, direct and indirect, including extended overhead. The Contract Timer; sed "eti endar days. The Contract Substantial Completion date will be April 1, 2000. The Cont t Fi I Codate will be May 1, 2000. Accepted by: �or- Dave g"rlef�ach Recommended by: I�L C5 141e.'c Carollo Esneers — Craig Ashcroft Approved by: City of Meridian C AW I N DD W SITEM PICHG D RD 2. DOC Date: Zi Date: 3 /3 / loo Date: ROBERT D. CORRIE 1.Iavor GARY D. SMITH. P.E. Public Works Director i CfTY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS 1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT March 14, 2000 RECEIVED BY FAX: 541.889.7755 MAR 17 200 0 Dave Erlebach, President T Tum -Ke Inc.TUR# E;1#c Y, 1551 NW 9t' Street Ontario, Oregon 97914 RE: BIOSOLIDS DEWATERING FACILITY Project Dear Dave: M NCIL,MEMBERS CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. B EtiTLE)" RON ANDERSON KEITH BIRD I received your proposal for addition of coating the dewatering building Interior. Afters speaking with p g all concerned please proceed with option #2, as described in Ed Ankenman's RFP toY ou dated 2128/00, for a lump sum total of $5,200.00. 1 will contact Tim Tekippe of Keller Associates and Craig Ashcroft of Carollo Engineers and ask them to prepare a change order for this includinga seven day time extension_ Thank you for preparing this proposal. Please call Ed Ankenman or me if you have anyg uestions regarding this particular matter. Sincerely, Brad Watson, P.E. Assistant City Engineer Enclosures: RFP No. 1, 2128100 TurnKey letter to BRW, 3110/00 cc: vary Smith, PE, John Shawcroft Ed Ankenman (by email) Craig Ashcroft, PE, Carollo Engineers (fax 2801.272.1235) Tim Tekippe, P.E., Keller Associates (fax 288.1999) File \ meridian3luserslbrad w\s8lturnkey3l40q.ltr.doe 200 East Carlton, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone (208) 887-2211 Fax(208) 587-1297 t } r t TURN -KEY, General Contractors Construction Managers March 101 2000 City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 53642 Attention: Mr. Brad Watson Dear Brad: The associated costs to coat the Biosolids Building is as follows: Option #1 - $37400.00 Option #2 - $51)200.00 17-e jZ' TJVz MAR 1 .1. 2000 RIDIAN CITY ENGINEER The contract completion date would also need to be extended (1) week to complete the work. This work is also dependent on the weather. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office at (541) 889-8885. Sincerely, a Dave C. Erlebach OREGON OFFICE IDAHO OFFICE � � .�' ffAZZVPBiosolids 1 Dewaterin ICorres ondencelCi of Meri 1D 83716 pn.541-sas-ae.e5 �p � � . ��-�� 0MQW LJC. # 1014?1, ' klaho P.U. # 11414 -LILA -144 0 Nevada Ur- 9 0038009 A i f r 1 City of Meridiaif. R1 .QUEST FOR 13ROPOS No. 0o0o z 'I'ITLE; CoaCrri� thd`iratferiot' block walls •r DATE: 212 $/00 �'TtO.� LS T; : Me "di an P-up-gradc; Bio -solids Building TO: Atari: Dave Lrlcbach Tum -key CONTRACT NO: cy const. ' To: From: Number,n l -s CRIPTION OF PROPOs.&.1� Please give the Owncr a cost proposal for the foil February �4, 200. following ppiton.� that was discussed at the fast cUnsrrttctionro ress P � meeting held on 0p(i011 # I. QuOtc a cost proposal for applying just s block sear cxfcr-ivr coating) to the following rm)ms. This w � (w'1terF'rr�of ng product identical to the same s�-ilcr used o � would be for the centrxi'ugc, and polymer, and rrsrroom arca n the walls from boor to cciling iz� the: moms Iistc-r�. Sees specs. section., ,s. Coat the entire: inicrior tljicknc.5s to be installed. on: X7194 hand spec. section 09960} for the t-�pprovcd tnatcrial, s and Included its this cost proposal is the labor androducts F netded to perform this task. apt ian 92. Quote a cost proposal for applying a block e roc�rn,�, ceritrifu . , g s al�xlrller (compatible with the finish ct�rjn [tstcd below - C gc, polymcr, s-ind restroom areas}. Q tion 2 a g ) fol- the ver same waIcrproof ng product and me ets lila same P also Includes applying a high .solids coating that is coni ati y requirc:rncntS that wa,� submitted for the prtatCcti�c: cn3ti n hie to the �'erFc�rm n i]cc Coot iligs (in Part icul ar the Amcrcoat 450If5 ng under submittal t]J Go -2 Hi It recornmcndzdon. The Owner will c1loosc }• The amount of co�t.� used will depend on the ;nanuf acture g the color for this product, a calor chart would be needed 4S to C1100sc. Phase; submit the color sample to the Cit Re t. 31d from the C:o11tractor ror the Owncr that the waterprm)ring product and the Iii t1 spji y P nnkentnan for distribution to the Owner. The contractor is to verify g cls Milling is compatible for this use. r'fy Upon acceptance of eitltcx of these o tin • p nst thc. contr�Zctor is req uircd to warranty the workmanship icic'nti�od in the �'on[ract I]ocumcnis. 7�'IiGsc cost rU anship and product for the re ;tired time P Pos11s include all `�srs associated with c] me pc.rforrn:ng Ibis task. Pvst-lt' Fax Note To .? Camept. Phone Fax x 7671 E pato 7 eV 4; hz46 Q (ac 7/ex 0/ A P-11It0VA L,. T;d Ankenman Date: 31.3!00 MAR 03 '00 15:19 Unit Cost! ]nit Tax: Lump Stern; Lump Tax: Total: fly; Dclue: 939 50?4 PAGE. 01 $0,00 $4100 50.04 $0.00 $0-00 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER DATE: CONTRACT FOR: WWTP Trunk Sewer OWNER: CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO TO: BROWN CONSTRUCTION INC. (Contractor) ORDER NO.: 1 You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes In INCREASE DECREASE This Change Order in Contract Price in Contract Price (list separately 1. Additional Concrete Lining of Creason Lateral $2500.00 2. Add rip -rap to ends of concrete lining at direction of N. M.I.D. $409.00 Sum of Increase and decrease: $2,999.00 Net Change in Contract Price: $2,999.00 JUSTIFICATION (attach supplemental documents): CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Original Contract Price: Previous Change Orders No. none to No. none : Contract Price prior to this Change order: Net (Increase, } of this Change Order: Contract Price with all approved Change Orders: - 1 - $23.702.00 -a $23.702.00 $2.999.00 $26.701.00 CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Time (substantial completion): 29 davs (2/16 - 3/15) Previous Change orders No. none to No. none : -.- Contract Time prior to this Change Order: 29 da s 2 16 - 311 Net (Increase/Decrease) of this Change order: o days Contract Time with all approved change Orders: 29 davs (2 116 -_3115) This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CHANGE ORDER LIMITS BY CONTRACTOR The increase or decrease in Contract price and/or Contract time stated in each and every R r Change order shall unequivocally comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the CONTRACTOR for the work or changes ordered by the Change order. By executing the change order, the CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments represent full compensation for all increases or decreases in cast or the time required to perform the Contract as whole arising directly or indirectly from the Change order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non -affected work under Contract not changed by the change order. Signing of the change order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in Contract price and/or time, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the contract Documents. Acceptance of this change order constitutes an agreement between owner and CONTRACTOR that the Change order represents an equitable adjustment to the contract, and that CONTRACTOR will waive all rights to file a claim of the Change Order after it is properly executed. All Change Orders shall include a written record, submitted by the CONTRACTOR, that states the basis of cost amount, including time and materials data, that enables the owner to determine the necessity and reasonableness of the Change order. RECOMMENDED: ENGINEER DATE: APPROVED: DATE: OWNER APPROVED: DATE: CONTRACTOR 3PX s'OK/N OitSii'NGiLOl4 HG. 694f1 VC WZa crrY of ivExxIDrArr � ATrrr: BRAD WATSON 200 E CARLTON STREET svim loo MAY 0 8 2000 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642-2600 MERIDIAN CITY ENGINEER TERMS QTY DESCRIPTION I CONCRETE DITCH I '�- ► % a r +� i ccni f-6<-4 CHANGE ORDER- -I WHEN BROWN CONSTRUCTION BID THIS PROJECT WE ESTIMATED $53,000.00 TO PUT THE CONCRETE LINER IN THE DITCH. WHEN WE PERFORMED THE WORD THE SLOPE THAT WAS ON THE PLAINS WAS NOT ACCURATE. THERE WAS EXTRA FORMING INVOLVED TO GET THE CONCRETE TO STAND AT SUCH AN EXTREME SLOPE. THIS ALSO TOOK ADDITIONAL CONCRETE. I WHEN TALKING TO NAMPA-MERIDIAN IRRIGATION THEY REQUIRED REP RAP AT EACH END OF THE CONCRETE DITCH. ADDITIONAL EXPENSE OF: Invoice DATE INVOICE NO. 5/4/00 165 PROJECT 84 - WWTP TRUNK SEWER (CREASON LAT... RATE AMOUNT 57040.40 51,000.00 23540.00 I 27500.00 499.00 1 499.00 Total s77999.00 ProfessYunal ConstructionSera tees Inc 3536 Frozen Dag Rd. Emmett, ID 53517 MAY n 8 2000 355-6853 .�+ . %, Wil ADIAN CIT` �� i SEC. BILL To Brown Construction Inc. 688. Bennett Road Nampa, Idaho 53585 EP.0-mber Terms Net 30 Days Invoice DATE � INVOICE # 4/3/2000 768 Location Meridian/Nampa Canal Invoices 30 days past due will be subject to a finance charge ge of 1.5% per month. MEMORANDUM CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: Leslie Howard CC: Mayor Corrie City Council President Bird FROM: William C. Berg, Jr. DATE: Wednesday, May 17t', 2000 RE„ Wafer, Sewer, and Trash Delinquency The City Council would still life to receive the spread sheet which compared on a month to month basis the approved delinquency number of accounts and amount of money to the actual number of accounts and amount of money turned off for nonpayment. Gust like we had prepared before) The City Council also approved the arrangement with Mr. Michael Kohntopp (account # 34.0830. 1) for a 60 days to pay period while waiting for HUD to response to him. After checking with legal counsel, we still need to have City Council approve the delinquency list because it is a Civil Right issue dealing with a utility service with a night to appeal process. 1f you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you. Subject: CUP -00-011 (Heron Brook Townhomes Sub) Date. May 17, 2040 Will: As I was sorting through the council items from last nights meeting, I noticed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Heron Brook which was left in the file. Therefore, please find the revised Order dated 05-16-00 to replace the one you previously received. If you have any questions please advise. ZAWorlclMWeridian 15360M1Heron Brook CUP and PP113erg051700.Mem RECORDED - REQUEST OF ADA COUNTY RECORDER 1J. 0AVT. NAR RO PfE D E P;,Q T Y 2 0 9 3 M Y 18 1100038154 MERIDIAN CITY BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST ) FOR VACATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY ) EASEMENT IN CENTRAL VALLEY ) CORPORATE PARD NO. 5, MERIDIAN, ) IDAHO 1 APPLICANT: RONALD C. NAHAS AND ) RAFANELLI NAHAS ) [1N71WAXIIII CASE NO. VAC -00-003 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT This matter coming on regularly before the City Council at its regular meeting on the 2 h day of May, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., and Gary Smith, Public Works Director, appeared and testified at the hearing, and no one appeared in opposition, and the Council having received the record from the Planning and Zoning Commission and its recommendations to the City Council, and no objection having been received snakes the following Findings of Fact and Decision and Order. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and —Page 1 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 STATEMENT OF LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Easements shall be vacated in the same manner as streets. {I.C. § 50- 13251. 2. The vacation of an easement which was accepted as part of a platted subdivision shall be vacated pursuant to the provision of Chapter 13, Title 50 Idaho Code f I.C. § 40-203 (6)}. 3. Any person, firm, association, corporation or other legally recognized form of business desiring to vacate a part of a plat which is inside the boundaries of any City must petition the City Council to vacate. Any person, persons, firm, association, corporation or other legally recognized form of business desiring to vacate a plat or any part thereof which is inside or within one (1) mile of the boundaries of any city must petition the city council to vacate. Such petition shall set forth particular circumstances of the requests to vacate; contain a legal description of the platted area or property to be vacated; the names of the persons affected thereby, and said petition shall be filed with the city clerk. Written notice of public hearing on said petition shall be given, by certified mail with return receipt, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of public hearing to all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the boundaries of the area described in the petition. Such notice of public hearing shall also be published once a week for two (2) successive weeks in the official newspaper of the city, the last of which shall be not less than seven (7) days prior to the date of said hearing; provided, however, that in a proceeding as to the vacation of all or a portion of a cemetery plat where there has been no interment, or in the case of a cemetery being within three hundred feet (300') of another plat for which a vacation is sought, publication of the notice of hearing shall be the only required notice as to the property owners in the cemetery. When the procedures set forth herein have been fulfilled, the city council may grant the request to vacate with such restrictions as they deem necessary in the public interest. In the case of easements granted for gas, sewer, water, telephone, cable television, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and —Page 2 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 power, drainage, and slope purposes, public notice of intent to vacate is not required. Vacation of these easements shall occur upon the recording of the new or amended plat, provided that all affected easement holders have been notified by certified mail, return receipt requested, of the proposed vacation and have agreed to the same in writing. {I.C. § 50-1306A (1), (2), (3) and (5)} 4. Pursuant to Meridian City Code §§ 12-10-1 A and B and 12-10-2 A and B it provides as follows: 12-10-1 APPLICATION PROCEDURE: E. Application: Any property owner desiring to vacate an existing subdivision, public right of way or easement shall complete and file an application with the Administrator. These provisions shall not apply to the widening of any street which is shown on this Comprehensive Development Plan, or the dedication of streets, rights of way or easements to be shown on a recorded subdivision. F. Administrator Action: Upon receipt of the completed application, the Administrator shall affix the date of application acceptance thereon. The Administrator shall place the application on the agenda for consideration at the nem regular meeting of the Commission which is held not less than fifteen (15) days after said date of acceptance. 12-10-2 COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTION: A. Commission Recommendation: The Commission shall review the request and all agency responses and make a recommendation to the Council for either approval, conditional approval, or denial. B. Council .Action: 1. Hearing; Notice: When considering an application for vacation procedures, the Council shall establish a date for a public hearing and give such public notice as required by law. The Council may approve, deny or modify the application. Whenever public rights-of-way or lands Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and —Page 3 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 are vacated, the Council shall provide adjacent property owners with a quit -claim deed for the vacated rights of way in such proportions as are prescribed by law. 2. Street Improvements; Bond: When considering an application for dedication procedures, the Council may approve, deny or modify the application. When a dedication is approved, the required street improvements shall be constructed or a bond furnished assuring the construction, prior to acceptance of the dedication. To complete the acceptance of any dedication of land, the owner shall furnish to the Council a deed describing and conveying such lands to be recorded with the County Recorder. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Ronald C. Nahas and Rafanelli Nahas, of 1 Bates Blvd., Suite 200, Orinda, California 94563, are the legal owners of the property. 2. Ronald C. Nahas and Rafanelli Nahas, filed a petition for the vacation of a public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5, as dedicated in the Warranty ]deed from Rafanelli and Nahas, a California general partnership, an undivided 50% interest to R. T. Nahas Company of Idaho, an Idaho corporation, recorded October 25, 1996, as Instrument No. 96089136. 3. The legal descriptions of the utility and drainage easements which are the subject of this petition are attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and consisting of four pages. 4. The recorded plat of this subdivision, note No. 12, declares the easement as follows: "An easement for public utilities, drainage and irrigation is hereby reserved over the entirety of Lot 12, Block 2." Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and —Page 4 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 5. The particular circumstances of the requested vacation is: The vacation is required to vacate a public utility easement in a C -G zone for subdivision Central Valley Corporate Park No. S. Part of the easement vacation is also going to involve a lot line adjustment for four lots within the subdivision. Lot No. 12 is the lot within which vacation of the utility easements is requested, and Lot 13, 14 and 15 of the subdivision will be increased in size from what was originally platted. Lot No. 12 will be decreased in size from what was originally platted. 6. The names of the affected by the petition to vacate include, and additionally when the Relinquishment of Easements are received they will be attached as Exhibit "B": 6.1 The applicant owner of the property are Ronald C. Nahas and Rafanelli Nahas, Orinda, California, and who applied for the vacation application. 6.2 Intermountain Gas Company, AT&T Cable Services, US West Communications, City of Meridian, and Idaho Power. 7. Written notice of the public hearing of this petition was given by certified mail with return receipt at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing to all property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the boundaries of the area described in the petition, and such notice was also published once a week for two (2) successive weeks in the Idaho Statesman with the last publication which was not less than seven (7) days prior to the hearing. 8. All affected utility holders have agreed to the requested vacation in writing. 9. All publication costs have been paid by the petitioner. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and —Page 5 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 DECISION AND ORDER OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING STATEMENT OF LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION AND STATEMENT OF FACTS RELATIVE To LEGAL AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION, the City Council does hereby ORDER and this does ORDER that: 1. That certain utility and drainage easement Lot 12, Block 2, as depicted on the Record of Survey of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5, is hereby vacated, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and consisting of four pages. 2. The recorded plat of this subdivision, note No. 12, declares the easement as follows: "An easement for public utilities, drainage and irrigation is hereby reserved over the entirety of Lot 12, Block 2." 3. The City Cleric shall cause a copy of this order to be served upon the affected utility holders, and the petitioner, Public Works, Planning and Zoning Departments, and the City Attorney's office. 4. The City Cleric shall cause a certified copy of this order to be recorded with the Ada County Recorders office. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and —Page 6 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 NOTICE of FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian; pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the vacation may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on thef 6t� day of !� , 2000. ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN BIRD VOTED � COUNCILPERSON deWEERD VOTED (7 COUNCILPERSON Mc LANDLESS VOTED IC/� MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and -Page 7 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 S Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. BY: / �:'ityberk STATE OF IDAHO, : ss. County of Ada. Mayor Robert D. Corrie DATED: On thisW day of Wa , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fors 'd State, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day & 4rst above written. 4z2'e ` 4 .ttA�: A,� ► (SEAT) ;�►t Notary lic for Idaho `►. _ � �' Commission Expires *Samoa* msg/Z:\WorlclM.\Meridian I5350M1Nahas VAQFfCIordVacUtilityEasmt.doc Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and —Page 8 of 8 Order of Vacation of public utility easement in Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 By: Ronald and Rafanelli Nahas /VAC -00-003 PARCEL 'I REVISED LOT 13 CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARI{ NO.5 Lot 13 Block 2 of Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5, located in the West 112 of Section 18�T.3iV. R. '1 E. B.M., Ada County, Idaho, as same is recorded in Book 73 of Plats , at Page 7535, records of Ada County, Idaho, Block of said central Valley Corporate Park No: 5 AND ALSO, A portion of Lot '1 Z, _ . y at the lot corner common to said Lots '12 and 13 lying',,-, , described as follows: Commencing .. . -L on the easterly right-of-way of S. Progress Avenue - o 'f feet to the REAL POINT of BEGINNING: thence South 5'I 46 East, 'I 9.'15 • .. t•. rz Thence South 9D°00'40" East, 57.84 feet to a pant; r 4-• J 28028'00" West, 27.72 feet to a point, _ thence South st, .85 feet to the Point of Beginning. l - thence North 611 2146�� We 56 s' EXHIBIT "A" 1 OF 4 PARCEL 2 REVISED LOT 14 CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK No, 5 Lot 14, Block 2 of Central Valley corporate Park No. 5, located in the West 112 of Section 181'T.M., RAE. B.M., Ada County, Idaho, as same is recorded in Book73 of Plats at Page 7535, records of Ada county, Idaho, AND ALSO: A portion of Lot 12, Block 2 of said Central Valley corporate Park No. 5 .described as follows: BEGINNING at the lot comer common to Lot 15 and the said Lot 14 lying on the North boundary of said Lot 12; thence south 00000'00" West, 28.97 feet to a point; thence South 90°90'09" West, 208.45 feat to a point; thence North 61121'46" West, 5.41 feet to a point; thence North 28°28'00" East, 27.72 feet to the southwest comer of said Lot 14; thence North 901190'00" East, 200.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "A" 2 OF 4 PARCEL 3 REVISED LOT 15 CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARD NO.5 Lot 5, Block of Central Vay Corporate Ila C❑ orate Park No. 5, located in the West 112 of Ada County, Idaho, as same is recorded in Book 73 of Plats Section 'l 8, T.3IV., R.1 E. B.M., Ad tY� at Page 7535, records of Ada County, Idaho, • lock 2 of said Central Valley Corporate Park No. 5 AND Also: A porton of Lot '1 �, B described as follows.. BEGINNING at the lot comer common to Lot 14 and the said Lot 15 lying on the Northerly boundary of said Lot �1 2; Y 9 thence North 9o°oo`00" East, 178.52 feet to a point; thence North 37024'00" East, 155.52 feet to a point; �t of a non -tan ent curve to the right, having a radius thence 7.44 feet along the arc 9 'Q0" and a long chord bearing South 35°29'08" of '1 '10.00 feet, a central angle of 37 4�4 , East, 71.14 feet to a point; thence South 101137125" East, 95.52 feat to a point; thence South 9o°o0'00" Test, 341.92 feet to a point; thence North 000000 , ' " East 25.97 feet to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "A" 3 OF 4 PARCEL 4 REVISED LOT 12 CENTRAL VALLEY CORPORATE PARK NO, 5 Lot 12, Block 2 of Central Valley corporate Park No. 5, located in the Nest 1/2 of = Section 18 T.3N., R.1 E. B.M., Ada County, Idaho, as same is recorded in Book 73 of Plats at Page 7535 records of Ada County, Idaho, - 1 EXCEPTING THEREFROM: A portion of Lot 12, Block 2 of said central valley No. 5 more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast. Corporate Park p �Y corner of said Lot 12; thence North 16°37'25" `Nest, 52.18 feet to the REAL POINT of BEGINNING. Thence South 90°00'00" West, 550.38 feet to a point thence North 51 °21'45" West, 50.28 feet to an angle point on the South boundary of Lot 13 of said central Valley corporate Park No. 5; the South bounds of Lots 13, 14 and 15 North 90°00'00" East, thence along .rY ti 435.35 feet to an angle point on the South boundary of said Lot 15; 9 thence North 37024'00" East 155.52 feet to the most northerly lot corner of said lot 12; ent curve to the right, having a radius of a non -tan thence 72.44 feet along the arc 9 of 110.00 feet, a central angle of 37044'00", and a tong chord bearing South 35029'08" East', 71.14 feet to a point; thence South 15137'25" East, 95.02 feet to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "A" 4 OF 4 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL [INIM 11, IN THE MATTER OF THE ) CASE NO. FP -00-004 APPLICATION OF ) MICHELANGELO ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL INVESTMENTS FOR APPROVAL ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT OF FINAL PLAT FOR ) TARAWOOD SUBDIVISION ) LOCATED SOUTH OF LOS ) ALAMITOS PARD St NORTH OF ) SHERBROOKE HOLLOWS, ) MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) This matter coming before the City Council for Final Plat approval pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-7 on May 16, 2000, and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete which has included certain comments and conditions as stated in a letter to the Mayor and Council from Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, and Bruce Frecicleton, Assistant to City Engineer, listing 8 General Comments and 12 Site Specific Comments, which are herein found fair and reasonable, and that Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, and Cary Smith, City Engineer, commented at the hearing, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat the Council takes the following action: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL .APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TARAwOOD SUBDIVISION - 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of "Tarawood Subdivision" as evidenced in Plat bearing the job reference 990510\990510 -PLT. BIB 12/20/1999, and stamped JAN 25 2000, Briggs Engineering, Inc. -Consulting Engineers, Michelangelo Investments, LLC -Developer, is Conditionally Approved subject to those conditions of Staff comments as set forth in the Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council from Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to the City Engineer, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, dated April 2 S, 2000, listing 8 General Comments and 12 Site Specific Comments, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein, with the additional requirements as follows, to -wit: 1.1 Developer shall grant to the City a pedestrian pathway easement, ten (10) feet in width, along the western boundary of Lot 1, Block 1. In the event that the City later obtains a pathway agreement with Nampa &.Meridian Irrigation District for the portion of the Ninemile Drain, which lies adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, then the City will relinquish this easement. 1.2 Fire Chief, Kenny Bowers, requires that all codes be met; that all streets, hydrants, and street name signs need to be installed before building is started; that all common lots will need to be kept clear of trash and weeds; and that there will be "No Parking" of vehicles, equipment or trailers in the cul-de-sacs. 1.3 The Central District Health Department requires after written approval from the appropriate entities are submitted, they can approve this proposal for central sewage and central water; that plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality for central sewage and central water; that run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem; and it is suggested that stormwater be pretreated ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TARAWOOD SUBDIVISION - 2 through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality; that engineers and architects should obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that is preventing groundwater and surface water degradation. Manuals for guidance: 1.3.1 State of Idaho Catalog Of Stormwater Best Management Practices For Idaho Cities And Counties. Prepared by the Idaho Division Of Environmental Quality, July 1997. 1.3.2 Stormwater Best Management Practices Guidebook. Prepared by City of Boise Public Works Department, January 1997. 1.4 Nampa &.Meridian Irrigation District noted that their District's Ridenbaugh Canal courses along the east boundary of the project. The recorded easement of the Ridenbaugh Canal is 100 feet, 50 feet from the center each way. The District's Ninemile Drain also courses through this parcel of land on the west boundary. The recorded easement of the Ninemile Drain is 60 feet, 30 feet from the center each way. The District reserves the right to claim what they deem necessary to operate and maintain the facilities. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the Certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: a. The Plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and b. The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. ORDER OF. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR TARAWOOD SUBDIVISION - 3 �1 By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 0 ----day of It , 2000. 61 y - B .1U D. CORRIE Mayor, City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department and the Public Worlcs Department. B�Dated. 4itylerk ZAWork1M\Meridian I5360M\Tarawood SubdivisionTPORDER S/ el 00 Or- E��, Cj ""AL ORDER OF. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of FINAL PLAT FOR TARAWOOD SUBDIVISION - 4 itilayor ROBERT D. CORRIE Citv Council Members CHARLES ROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITH BIRD HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY ( fir. A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83542 (208) 538-4433 • Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Fax (208) 888-4218 To: Mayor &City Council From: Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City Engineer Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator �S_ G'(i - S�rri l'a` t7�C,T_V---ILi It APR 2 8 "�u00 Ciiz Of 'feridia' City Clergy. Office= - t•aL Qo 1- 1 �y r April 28, 2000 Re: Request for Final Plat for TARAWOOD SUBDIVISION j 32 Single-family Lots on 12.80 Acres by Michelangelo Investments, LLC / Frank Stopello We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the application. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Applicant is to meet all terms and conditions of the approved preliminary plat. 2. Any existing i*m*gationldrainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 3. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City ordinance Sections 9-1-4 and 9-4--8. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 4. Five -foot -wide sidewalks and pedestrian walkways shall be provided in accordance with City ordinance Section 12-5-2.K. 5. Submit oletter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approvi fi_ n ng the subdivision and street names. Make any corrections necessary to conform. 6. Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 7. Submit three copies of the revised Final Plat to the Meridian Public works Department for review and approval prior to development plan approval. FP -00-044 Tarawood Sub.FP.doc Mayor and City Council April 20 p 00 Page 2 8. Please respond in writing, prior to the scheduled hearing, to the comments contained in this memorandum. Detail any arguments you may have in opposition to any of these comments, or simply signify your acceptance by stating oApplicant will Comply.p SITE SPECIFIC REQ NTS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this site will be via an extension from the existing main that is adjacent to the proposed development. Applicant will be responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public 'darks Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the seer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2. water service to this site will be via extensions of existing mains installed in adjacent developments Applicant will be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public works Department. 3. Prior to City of Meridian signature on the Final Plat map, detailed landscape plans for common areas, fencing, and pathways must be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Department. 4. one -hundred -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights will be required at locations designated by the Public works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. S. The applicant has indicated that Nampa -Meridian Im'gation District will own and operate the pressurized irrigation system. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water. If a creek or well source is not available, a single -point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single -point connection is utilized, the developer shall be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to signature on the final plat by the Meridian City Engineer. 6. The bearing of the first leg of the tie from the Real Point of Beginning does= match the corresponding bearing in the Certificate of owners. Please correct. 7. Permanent non-combustible fencing is to be installed along the common area lot line for the Ridenbaugh Canal and Nine Mile Creek. Construct six -foot -high, permanent, non- combustible perimeter fencing except where the City has expressly agreed, in writing, that such fencing is not necessary. Fencing is to be in place prior to applying for building permits. Tamwood Sub.FF.doc FF-0a-DQd i Mayor and City Council T April 28, 2000 Page 3 8. Street signs are to be in place, water system shall be approved and activated, pressurized irrigation system approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District, and perimeter fencing is to be in place prior to any building permits being issued.Landscaping and pedestrian walkways shall be installed prior to obtaining certificates of occupancy. 9. Modify or revise the following notes: 11. (Reference to Lots 1 & 21, Block 1 should be made, as well as Lot 9, Block 3 for the Ridenbaugh Canal) lo. Complete The recording information in Mote number 12. 11. Graphically depict a 10 -foot -wide Public Utilities, Drainage, and Irrigation Easements along the following lot lines: North Side Lot 31 Block 1, Lots 1,5--7, 11, Block 2, Lots 18, 12-14, Block 3, Lots 8-9, Block 2, Lot 16, Block 3 South Side Lots 7-8, Block 11, Lots 2-8, Block 3, Lots 7-10, Block 2 Westerly Side Lots 3-7, Block 1 Easterly Side Lot 1, Block 2, Lots 17-18 Block 3, Lots 8, 10-12, Block 3 (Easement on Lot 8 needs to maintain a . ' um of 5 - feet into lot from the pLessurized irrigation line) Northeasterly Side Lots 2--3, Block 2 12. Applicant has submitted Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions per application requirements, however the body of the CCRms is from another development, even though the title sheet states Tarawood Subdivision. Applicant shall submit for review, to the City Attorneym office, CCRns that pertain in whole to this development. Ta wog Sub.FF.doc City of Meridian City Clerk's Office Phone: 208-888-4433 Fax: 208-688-4218 To: Frank Stoppello From: Shelly Fax:~ { Pages: 8 Phone: Date: 06/01/00 Re: Tarawood order of Conditional cc: Richard Cook, Briggs Engineering 46 - 7 q,56 Approval ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Frank., Following is a signed copy of the Order of Conditional Approval for the final plat of Tarawood Subdivision. 1 will follow up by sending you a copy. Thanks and call if you have any questions. Shelby WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER PHILIP A. PETERSON WM. F. GIGRAY, III STEPHEN L. PRUSS BRENT JOHNSON ERIC S. RossMAN D. SAMUEL JOHNSON TODD A. ROSSMAN WILLIAM A. MORROW DAVID M. SWARTLEY WILLIAM F. NICHOLS* TERRENCE R. WHITE** CHRISTOPHER S. NYE *ALSO ADMIT'T'ED IN OR "ALSO ADMITTED IN WA 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE SOX 1.150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288-2501 Email via Internet @ wfg@wppmg.com May 25, 2000 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653-0247 TEL (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466-4445 PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk J U N - 1 20Q0 33 East Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 CIH OF MY"MUN,, Re: TA.RAWOOD SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT (FP -00-004) Dear Will: Regarding the above referenced matter, please find enclosed the original of the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT for approval and signature by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve a copy of the ORDER upon the Applicant, with a Certificate of Service in the file and a copy to Planning and Zoning and Public Works. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, Wm. F. Nichols msg/Z:\Work\M`Meridian 153 60M\Tarawood Subdivision\Clerk05 1800. Ltr P GE . .. t FJ 14 IvEl) To: William G. Berg, Jr. MAY 2 6 2000 From: William F. Nichols CITY OF MERIDLAN Subject: GEMTONE SUBDIVISION NO. 4 / TE-00-003 Date: May 19, 2000 Will -0 Please find enclosed the original of the ORDER GRANTING A SIX (6) MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN, in Gemtone Subdivision No. 4. This ORDER is pursuant to the timely request of the Applicant and pursuant to the City Council's action at its May 16, 2000 meeting. Therefore, please present this ORDER to Mayor Corrie to obtain his signature. Please forward copies to the Applicant, Planning and Zoning, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you have any questions please advise. msg/Z:IWork1M`Meridian 15360KGemtone No.4\Berg051900.Mem BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE ) APPLICATION FOR FILING ) PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ) FINAL PLAT ) DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ) GEMTONE SUBDIVISION ) NO. 4, LOCATED AT THE ) NE 1/4 SECTION 8, T. 3N., ) R. lE., (WEST OF HICKORY ) AVENUE BETWEEN PINE ) STATE), MERIDIAN, IDAHO) BY: BECICY BOWCUTT ) PLANNING SERVICES ) 05-19-00 CASE NO. TE -00-003 ORDER GRANTING A SIX (6) MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN This matter coming on regularly before the City Council on the 16`" day of May, 2000, upon the Applicant's time application for an extension within which to submit the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Development Plan as provided in § 11-9- 604 F 2., and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER THAT: The above named Applicant is granted a six (6) month extended period of time from the date of this Order within which to submit the Preliminary Plat and Final ORDER GRANTING A SIX (6) MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT PAGE 1 OF 2 AND FINAL PLAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Plat Development Plan for the above entitled subdivision application. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting on the �day of 2000. DATED this. day of ,. , 2000. MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: CITY CLERK Dated: � lb ,49d msg/.Z:\WorIclM\Meridian 15360M\Gemtone NoAMmeExtensionSixMonth. ORD ORDER GRANTING A SIX (6) MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT PAGE 20F 2 AND FINAL PLAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 16,2000 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Janice Smith REF: Latecomers We need your approval to refund Latecomer Overpayments as per the attached listing. This list includes 12% interest up thru May 2000, which you approved in the last Council Meeting. CITY of MERIDIAN LATECOMERS Latecomers Refund Amount Due Due To; w/12% interest Address Absolute Restoration 480.87 11271 W Montana St Boise, Idaho 83704 Bob Brown 17809.90 695 Whitehall Meridian, Idaho 83642 Borup Construction 41$$6.21 2250 N Meridian Rd Meridian, Idaho 83642 Bruno Development 31148.6$ 1595 Via Roberto Meridian, Idaho 83642 Burgundy Homes 47667.78 PO Box 877 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Campbell Construction 41257.62 1150 E Ustick Rd Meridian, Idaho 83642 Canyon Crest Homes 31010.58 345 Panorama P1 Boise, Idaho 83702 Capitol Builders 668.40 PO Box 1349 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Chet Vandewater 37065.82 1937 Summerridge Dr Meridian, Idaho 83642 Church of Latter Day Saints 5,385.37 3451 N Locust Grove Meridian, Idaho 83642 City Builders 861.84 1777 Gekeler Boise, Idaho 83706 Country Homes '1,76'1.48 HC33 Box 3070 Boise, Idaho 83706 Creative Homes 11573.20 7651 W Devonwood Boise, Idaho 83703 CW Construction 10,060.63 1300 S Heidi PI Meridian, Idaho 83642 D&H Builders, Inc 940.50 3376 E Echo Dr Boise, Idaho 83712 Darrel Tomlinson 464.43 1817 Marshwood PI S Meridian, Idaho 83642 Darrel Wilson Construction 11615.77 10605 W Dawson Boise, Idaho 83704 Doug Bodine 11546.72 1207 Northgate Ct Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dumars Construction 11615.77 1978 N Highwood Ave Boise, Idaho 83713 Russell Dunstan Construction 31697.68 1401 E Mallory Lane Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dunstan Construction 621.39 8037 W Gillis Boise, Idaho 83703 Elite Homes, Inc. 31017.74 8891 W River Ranch Boise, Idaho 83714 Elliott Construction 41665.49 5652 Crimson Boise, Idaho 83703 Emerald Homes 37477.60 1224 1st St South Ste#301 Nampa, Idaho 83651 Gary Coffman 807.11 219 E Gettysberg Boise, Idaho 83705 Gem Park Partnership 15491.48 2000 Victory E Meridian, Idaho 83642 Glenn Johnson Homes 19,858.73 2460 S Maple Grove Rd Boise, Idaho 83709 Gorman-Tutt 876.96 10849 W Treeline Street Boise, Idaho 83713 Granite Homes 31036.00 2604 N Cole Rd Boise, Idaho 83707 Hallmark Homes 710.27 1310 E Sothesby St Meridian, Idaho 83642 Hanson Homes 884.52 5706 N Plumcreek Ln Boise, Idaho 83713 Harbor Homes 21815.75 4360 E Fairview Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Harriman Construction 861.84 7205 Emerald St Boise, Idaho 83704 Heaton Construction 31010.58 456 W Woodbury Meridian, Idaho 83642 High Desert Construction 1,629.58 2090 S Cole Rd Boise, Idaho 83709 Holton Homes 91132.29 16299 Franklin Rd Nampa, Idaho 83587 Hunt Construction 1,548.32 2543 E Boomer Boise, Idaho 83703 J&W Homes 41792.07 1357 E Pitkin Meridian, Idaho 83642 05/12/2000 Refunds listing pagel of 2 CITY of MERIDIAN LATECOMERS Latecomers Refund Amount Due Due To: w/12% interest Address James P Hanke 17451.37 12371 W Engelmann Dr Boise, Idaho 83714 Jared Mason Sherburne 884.52 4820 W Rosehill Boise, Idaho 83705 JD Marrs 11491.48 4011 Delmonte Dr Boise, Idaho 83704 JDH Builders 668.40 2969 E Coldcreek St Eagle, Idaho 83615 John Flaherty 21079.42 6002 Franklin Rd Boise, Idaho 83709 Markar Design & Construction 61939.55 2830 Duane Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian School District 21445.04 911 Meridian St Meridian, Idaho 83642 Mini Mansions 1,714.58 10228 Duck Lane Nampa, Idaho 83686 Mr Construction 11588.15 917 Sylvan Boise, Idaho 83706 North Woods Construction 17601.96 2104 Silver Creek Lane Boise, Idaho 83706 Pat Palmer Construction 31649.44 1588 Deadwood Eagle, Idaho 83616 Ramsey Construction 11505.29 4605 Floating Feather Eagle, Idaho 83516 Regency Homes 47564.40 2015 N Midland Blvd Nampa, Idaho 83651 Remarkable Homes 21414.81 10348 Feeder Boise, Idaho 83709 Retro Homes 748.12 680 N Momingside Boise, Idaho 83712 Rocky Ridge Homes 21456.24 2211 S Weimaraner Way Meridian, Idaho 83542 Roper Construction, Inc. 11601.96 10105 Calico Street Boise, Idaho 83709 Schaffner Construction 51440.59 1655 Fairview Ave Ste#201 Boise, Idaho 83702 Shadow Mountain Const., Inc. 31203.92 9488 W River Beach Lane Boise, Idaho 83714 Shearer Construction 31065.82 PO Box 1264 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Sierra Construction i ,601.96 PO Box 190103 Boise, Idaho 83719 Specialty Homes 21319.53 2042 E Summerridge Meridian, Idaho 83542 Stacy Construction 51410.27 1858 Summercove Dr Meridian, Idaho 83642 Tim Austin Construction 31093.44 1260 N Rutledge Meridian, Idaho 83642 Timberline Custom Homes 11491.48 953 N Ralstin Meridian, Idaho 83542 Truax Company 11397.06 PO Box 4597 Boise, Idaho 83711 White and Sons Construction 51429.04 555 Jackson St Boise, Idaho 83705 [Woodside Homes 31667.83 25999 Lansing Lane Middleton, Idaho 83644 Total Refunds 1929782.65 Western States Equipment 44,951.61 (interest and ENR costs) John Barnes 17,466.14 (balance of agreement) Kevin Howell Construction 11,843.50 (balance of agreement) Interwest 591.19 (interest and ENR costs) Amount due to Developers wlagreements 743852.44 Total Due on .5 Latecomer Agreements 267,635.09 (Western States, Interwest, Westpark, South Slough, Meridian Road) 05/12/2000 Refunds listing page2 of 2 DATE: May 16, 2000 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Janice Smith REF: LID's This is just to let you know that we have 2 past due LID's, #11 and # 15 on the attached report. The Engineering Department is making some changes on #I I - Tami 11- Tami Shoemaker, and we will be working with her on a payment schedule. We would like to put a lein on the property # 15 -Terry Woodward, if we do not receive a payment by the end of June this year. He has only made one payment since 199 1. We will be working with the attorney and following State Code attaching a lein to the property tax. I&ECf5VED i_ mog. . . . . . . . . . MAY 20DO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ----- ---- rte' CITY OF MERIDIAN INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: May 16, 2000 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Janice Smith REF: LID's This is just to let you know that we have 2 past due LID's, #11 and # 15 on the attached report. The Engineering Department is making some changes on #I I - Tami 11- Tami Shoemaker, and we will be working with her on a payment schedule. We would like to put a lein on the property # 15 -Terry Woodward, if we do not receive a payment by the end of June this year. He has only made one payment since 199 1. We will be working with the attorney and following State Code attaching a lein to the property tax. Z Q W 2 LL 0 ?r F- 5 OD R! co 0 cs) LO vn•� .:::.0 N; T- N C'7 Cf l!? Co co D7 a r � r r r U-) CD CD tD V- 0 0 d7 LO LO N May 12, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 16, 2000 APPLICANT City Councilperson -Tammy deWeerd ITEM NO. j!qL,g -� REQUEST Pathway Master Plan Committee /Subcommittee of Parks and Recreation Commission AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Materials presented at public meetings shall became property of the City of Meridian. MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APPLICANT.* AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: # le REQUEST: G�t� AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.- MERIDIAN ISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POKIER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: FFeElvED MAY 1 6 7-000 DELINQUENCY FOR TURN CITY of HERIDM OFF SCHEDULED FOR 05/17/00 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, May 16, 2000, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on May 17, 2000, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (No response.) MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $13,731.66. *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers May 16,2000 08:44am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No 9900000 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 21.0184.1 ALLEN, ROBERT 130.88 96.84 34.04 - - 02/17/2000 34.04 - none 51.0050.1 AMYX FAMILY LIMITED 558.31 - - - 558.31 - none 21.1784.1 ANDERSEN, SHARRON 114.75 72.77 26.38 15.60 - 04/19/2000 60.00 - none 68.0070.1 ARES, TONY 198.83 115.43 37.87 45.53 - 04/10/2000 40.00 - none 21.1930.2 BAILEY, BRUCE 742.95 610.53 47.06 85.36 - - 21.2736.1 BAILEY, MICHELLE 212.11 157.00 37.87 17.24 - 05/11/2000 25.00 _ none 3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 213.96 156.94 57.02 - - 02/24/2000 112.81 -none 69.0484.2 BARBER, CURTIS 111.91 97.35 14.56 _ - - 46.0448.1 BEERY, LON 118.25 85.02 33.23 - - 04/13/2000 20.57 - none 2.5690.2 BELL, DERRICK 93.00 65.39 27.61 - _ 02/24/2000 42.54- 2.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 97.11 59.24 37.87 - - 02/11/2000 55.36 - none 4.1294.1 BLASER, GLENN 154.77 67.85 86.92 - - 03/06/2000 301.05 - none 21.3290.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 243.35 186.86 56.49 _ - 02/11/2000 195.00- 95.00_31.0512.1 31.0512.1 BOKMAN, HELEN 195.91 138.34 57.57 - - 04/11/2000 50.00 - none 51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI 202.35 170.86 31.49 - - - 4.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 242.49 132.96 60.85 48.68 - 04/19/2000 100.00 _ none 34.1844.1 B U F FAT, STEPHEN 306.42 236.38 70.04 - _ 04/10/2000 70.04 - none 19.0976.1 BURGUNDY HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - - 69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 86.04 57.36 28.68 _ - 02107/2000 92.47 -- none 32.1452.1 BYRN E, JASON 96.50 72.42 24.08 - - 02/29/2000 27.91 - none 20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA 65.49 54.64 10.85 - - 04/20/2000 24.08 - none 48.1610.1 CB FINANCIAL DEV. L.L.C. 1,474.08 1,127.29 346.79 - - 04/04/2000 1,482.50- 33.2620.1 CECIL, ODETTE 140.76 126.81 13.95 - - 03/15/2000 31.58 - none 2.1770.1 CHERRY LANE LAUNDROMAT 940.51 699.79 240.72 - - 04/11/2000 282.85 - none 50.0206.1 CLARK, TERRY 79.90 55.82 24.08 - - 04/10/2000 24.08 - none 74.3304.2 COMPARATO, BRYAN 76.92 66.71 10.21 - - 05/0112000 20.00- 51.0286.1 CROW, DAN 90.02 62.11 27.91 - - 03/21/2000 3'1.74 - none 51.0998.1 CULVER, WALTER 93.40 57.83 35.57 - - 03/28/2000 77.90 - none 21.1520.2 DAHM, VIRGIL 87.47 63.39 24.08 - - 03/01/2000 24.08- 42.2388.2 QALY, BERT 249.57 73.19 176.38 - - 02/09/2000 206.19- 64.0002.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 125.23 - 17.47 16.88 90.88 - none 4.0564.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 78.72 54.64 24.08 -- - - 22.1420.1 DAVENPORT, DUANE 149.62 68.13 34.04 34.04 13.41 04/13/2000 75.00 - none 1.0770.1 DEUBER, THOMAS 135,86 - - - 135.86 - none 2.1721.1 DR. BARRY SAMS 10.17 - 10.00 .17 12/13/1999 43.62 - none 42.3106.1 DUNSTAN, JOAN 87.47 63.39 24.08 - - 04/11/2000 39.40 - none 74.3370.1 ECHIPARE, DOMINADOR 121.60 78.20 41.70 1.70 - 03/14/2000 50.00 - none 34.1898.1 EDINGER, REX S. 107.22 59.56 24.08 23.58 - 05/11/2000 60.00 - none 15.0022.2 EMERALD HOMES INC 76.89 18.51 21.94 24.08 12.36 04/24/2000 18.51- 2.0180.1 ENGLISH, RONDA 122.42 4.60 2.30 36.38 79.14 10118/1999 32.69 - none 52.0250.1 FIRST SECURITY BANK 25.92 12.96 6.48 6.48 - 01120/2000 6.48 - none 74.1316.1 FULLER, NORMAN 109.44 27.36 13.68 13.68 54.72 10/19/1999 122.07 - none 31.2250.1 GARCIA, ANOTONIO 267.53 179.87 87.66 - - 03/23/2000 106.81 - none 21.3048.2 GARLICK, LEWIS 522.62 207.77 82.34 99.15 133.36 04/11/2000 100.00- 32.0732.1 GLASER, DELMAR 142.18 98.95 43.23 - - 04111/2000 50.89 -- none 69.1703.1 GLENCO INC. 110.57 40.50 - - 70.07 09/24/1999 554.95 - none 13.2028.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 02/22/2000 43.23- 3.23-15.0002.1 15.0002.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 02/22/2000 58.47- 13-0022.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 -- - - 33.0332A GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 80.83 54.64 26.19 -- - 02/2212000 50.64 - none 33.0102.1 GRAND AUTO 551.07 444.54 106.53 - -- 03/22/2000 106.53 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List-- council Standard Payment Customers Current Period: 05/3112000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 31.3036.1 HASSIS, BENJAMIN & PAM 5.0722.1 HOLLEY, DAVID 51.4250.1 HOME PRC PLUMBING 74.1146.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 74.1202.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 50.1706.2 HUNT, STEVE 20.1894.2 HUSTON, ADDY 50.4506.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 3.0012.1 JENNI, TERRY 51.3082.1 JOHNSON PROPERTY MGMNT 1.0220.1 JOHNSON, MILDRED 2.1890.2 JOHNSON, STEVEN 2.3120.1 KELLEY, DAVID 34.3212.1 KERBS, DAVID 21.2728.1 KESLING, SCOTT & MONICA 34.0452.1 KLUM, ALLAN 74.0670.3 KNOLL, HARVEY 22.1524.2 KOCH, CARL 2.6030.1 KRASOWSKI, TQM 1.0890.1 LANTZ, STAN 2.1970.1 LARSON, KERRY L 33.0108.1 LARSON, TIMOTHY 22.0332.1 LEE, MICHELLE 33.2348.1 LEDER, RHONDA 31.3354.1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 31.3496.2 LETTICH, KENNETH 33.2278.1 LEWIS, RIK & CAROL 2.0448.1 LLOYD, BRADLEY 32.1320.1 LUKE, DAVID C 74.3072.1 LYTLE, CHAD & STACEY 2.4480.1 MADRID, JOSEPH F 5.0268.1 MANOS, PETER 21.1878.1 MARSTON, KELLI 34.0994.1 MASON, DREW & VICKIE 1.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 31.2192.1 MCMILLAN, VICKI 33.2402.1 MCPHERSON, JO ANN 20.1664.1 MEDLEY, STEVEN 69.1249.1 MER GRNS #3 HOMEOWNERS A 69.0981.1 MERIDIAN GREENS HOMEOWNE 69.1659.1 MERIDIAN GRNS HOMEOWNERc. 74.3246.1 MEYER, JOHN & LISA 31 .0568.1 MILLER, NEIL 40.0202.1 MONTEE, KENNETH 74.2832.1 MOONEY, KEVIN 32.0804.1 MORGAN, CHARLES 2.0526.1 MOSS!, DAVID L 31.0726.1 NITZ, JASON 50.1464.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 50.1456.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 21.2744.1 ORTON, JOHN & LARAINE 46.0240.1 PATTERSON, RYAN 4.1240.1 PEARSON, RONALD 74.3000.1 PHILLIPS, RICHARD 22.1564.1 PITTI. JOHN JOSEPH *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Balance Nan-Delina 02/29/2000 01131/2000 12/31/1999 Date 129.46 93.89 35.57 - 571.82 260.53 69.57 59.23 311.36 206.46 103.23 1.67 1,772.09 1,393.04 379.05 - 196.26 179.53 16.63 - 75.60 48.16 24.08 3.36 98.08 71.70 26.38 -- 929.92 - - - 108.41 90.97 17.44 - 81.86 57.78 24.08 - 115.35 - -- 34.08 124.56 81.33 43.23 - 371.79 - 40.60 35.57 78.72 54.64 24.08 - 133.62 95.75 37.87 - 245.03 - - - 104.86 55.15 24.08 24.08 112.37 84.46 27.91 - 130.33 96.60 33.73 - 76.76 54.64 22.12 - 125.73 94.03 31.70 - 80.99 - - -- 124.68 85.28 35.57 3.83 78.99 59.84 19.15 - 90.07 62.16 27.91 - 66.27 54.64 11.63 - 140.45 95.14 45.31 - 139.57 101.66 37.91 - 88.39 55.45 32.94 - 92.81 62.60 30.21 - 109.77 71.86 37.91 - 313.84 207.24 106.60 - 300.00 - - - 111.14 77.06 34.08 - 68.80 54.64 14.16 - 194.48 139.80 54.68 - 152.01 97.54 54.47 - 136.78 95.89 40.89 - 44.76 8.10 -- - 62.94 3.24 - - 77.11 11.34 - - 187.32 129.53 57.79 - 127.28 87.88 39.40 - 101.56 73.65 27.91 - 126.11 84.63 41.48 - 162.14 118.91 43.23 - 258.70 184.83 73.87 - 126.27 55.87 24.08 24.08 234.70 219.79 14.91 - 633.63 413.48 220.15 - 89.03 - 22.65 26.38 260.97 - 22.65 36.38 143.90 96.03 47.87 -- 116.07 78.20 37.87 - 267.79 184.96 82.83 - - 04/10/2000 182.49 05/02/2000 - 02/15/2000 - 05/01/2000 - 05/01/2000 - 04/20/2000 - 03/28/2000 929.92 - 03/07/2000 - 04/19/2000 81.27 11/18/1999 - 04/13/2000 295.62 12/15/1999 - 01/12/2000 - 04/10/2000 245.03 1.55 - 04/13/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 02/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 80.99 04/20/2000 - 04/03/2000 04/25/2000 02/25/2000 - 44/13/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 03/10/2000 300.00 04/20/2000 - 02/16/2000 - 01/03/2000 - '04112/2000 - 04/20/2000 - 04/11/2000 36.66 09/29/1999 59.70 10/19/1999 65.77 10/19/1999 - 04/05/2000 02/24/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 05/05/2000 - 03/29/2000 22.24 03/06/2000 - 03/20/2000 - 03/20/2000 40.00 11/09/1999 201.94 03/22/2000 - 0211012.000 02/14/2000 - 10/26/1999 Page: 2 May 16,2000 08:47am Last Pmt Amount Msg 43.23 - none 75.00 - none 101.56 - none 67.52 - none 90.50 - none 50.00- 70.42- - 0.00- 70.42- - none 100.00 - none 26.08 - none 54.59 - none 70.04- 140.00 - none 48.16 - none 55.27 -- none - none 47.91- 60.00 - none 370.00 - none 50.00 - none 10.00 - none 35.57 - none 24.08 - none 62.47 - none 70.00 - none 219.34 - none 24.08 - none 70.42 - none 88.93 - none 187.02 - none 57.35 - none 168.56 - none 69.71- 57.87 - none 59.92 - none 64.00 - none 58.23 - none 60.36- 713.57 - none 23.24 - none 60.89 - none 35.57 - none 53.00 - none 78.23 - none 85.36 - none 89.37 - none 158.92 - none 158.72 none 85.76 - none 50.00 - none 116.07 - none 68.08 - none 245.87 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers May 16,2000 08:50am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 3.0332.1 PORTER, DAVID 120.71 85.14 35.57 - - 03/07/2000 73.74 - none 3.0116.1 PORTER, TAD 104.63 74.42 30.21 - - 02/09/2000 93.23 - none 20.0210.1 REED, RON 153.55 106.49 47.06 - - 04/12/2000 31.74- 64.4062.1 REMARKABLE HOMES INC 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - - 32.0458.2 ROAM, JACQUELINE 91.95 81.03 10.92 - - 01/03/2000 165.00- 2.0970.1 ROEPKER, DAVID 128.79 71.86 27.91 29.02 - 04/28/2000 100.00 - none 51.3310.1 ROGERS, MILDRED 68.64 45.76 22.88 - - 04/05/2000 22.88 - none 50.0154.1 RON SMITH CONSTRUCTION 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - - 19.7156.1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 87.47 63.39 24.08 - - 03/13/2000 17.60- 33.2324.2 SAUNDERS, KELLEY 125.79 90.22 35.57 - - 04/13/2000 47.06- 7.06-1.2260.1 1.2260.1 SCOTT, DAVID 104.03 55.87 24.08 24.08 - 03/15/2000 53.90 - none 1.2040.1 SEAMONS, DOUGLAS 118.49 87.87 30.62 - - 05/11/2000 37.00 - none 74.2890.1 SHAFFER, ROBERT 107.94 80.03 27.91 - - 02/07/2000 95.22 - none 34.0724.2 SILCOX, BENJAMIN 91.16 63.25 27.91 - - 02/07/2000 24.08 - 21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 123.02 100.51 22.51 - -- 03/16/2000 11.07- 111.07- 2. 1200.1 2.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 123.31 87.74 35.57 - - 04/10/2000 43.21 - none 2.4360.1 SMITH, ANNETTE 180.38 91.31 89.07 - - 03/17/2000 302.88 - none 31.0134.1 SMITH, BRADLEY 152.04 112.64 39.40 - - 04/13/2000 50.89 - none 22.1270.1 SPARLING, ROBERT & MARTHA 682.81 66.85 18.62 37.91 559.43 10/21/1999 201.00 - none 2.1160.1 STATES, DION 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 02/08/2000 82.64 - none 51.3280.1 STENSON, VIRGINIA 305.59 137.60 77.70 66.21 24.08 - none 22.1380.1 STORER, GEORGE & PATRICIA 370.57 _ - - 370.57 - none 32.1710.1 STROEB EL, SEAN 337.50 - - 10.00 327.50 08/18/1999 171.09 - none 22.0860.2 TEATER, SUSAN 151.00 39.80 19.90 36.38 54.92 11116/1999 3,42- 2.1190.1 TERRELL, A 116.28 91.31 24.97 - - 04/1312000 50.00 - none 2.1930.1 TERRY, TIMOTHY 144.78 - - - 144.78 10/01/1999 82.59 - none 2.0952.1 THOMAS, TIMOTHY 104.30 76.39 27.91 - - 02/01/2000 49.06 - none 34.1550.1 THOMPSON, HARRY 16.48 6.48 10.00 - - 02/22/2000 86.22 - none 35.5048.1 TIM AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - - 2.2200.3 TODD, RICK 88.72 64.64 24.08 - - 04/11/2000 24.08- 31.2254.1 TURNER, RAYMOND 248.28 - - - 248.28 - none 34.2104.1 TYLER, HEIDI 134.54 95.14 39.40 - - 04112/2000 33.42 - none 5.0456.1 LIPTON, CHAD 554.14 - - 36.38 517.76 09/15/1999 262.50 - none 69.1192.1 USTICK, JOHN & KATHRYN 137.68 92.15 45.53 - - 03/29/2000 53.19 - none 19.0120.2 VANLEUVEN, MATTHEW 72.81 62.02 10.79 - - - 2'1.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 112.24 87.14 25.10 - - 05/04/2000 50.00 - none 1.3340.1 WALSH, RON 165.69 - - - 165.69 10/15/1999 191.33 - ***none 21.2714.1 WATERMAN, LORI 143.85 103.55 40.30 - - 03/23/2000 40.00 - none 2.6080.1 WEBB, GERALD 93.00 66.62 26.38 -- - 02/24/2000 26.38 _ none 21.1968.2 WELDIN, TAMRA 85.62 59.24 26.38 - -- 02108/2000 89.54- 34.3266.1 WESTERN FINANCIAL SERVICE 106.76 84.86 21.90 - - 05/01/2000 85.31 - none 32.0846.1 WHITE, LUCILLE 84.87 60.79 24.08 - - 02/28/2000 27.91 - none 52.0262.1 WILD SHAMROCK LLP 944.35 635.95 308.40 - - 02128/2000 670.70 - none 69.1304.1 WILDE, KENNETH 221.41 107.19 45.53 64.68 4.01 03/31/2000 68.10 - none 74.0356.1 WILSON, DEANA 110.46 97.83 12.63 - - 04/12/2000 80.00 - none 3.0052.2 WINN, MARY 41.68 26.38 15.30 - - - 31.3230.1 WITT, STEPHEN M. 73.09 60.79 12.30 - - 04/20/2000 24.08 - none 32.1560.1 WOOD, ADRON 33.76 - - 19.32 14.44 - none 31.3344.1 WOODRUFF, NOEL R 190.61 131.80 51.66 7.15 - 04/12/2000 50.00 - none 22.1622.1 WRIGHT, DARRIN 94.51 68.13 26.38 - - 04/14/2000 37.87 - none 19.6500.1 WRIGHT, SHEILA 162.75 121.05 41.70 - - 03/08/2000 53.19 - none 74.3348.2 YEATTS, PAMELA 85.43 55.22 30.21 - - 02/08/2000 40.84- 2.0670.1 YOUNG, AUSTIN L 296.74 101.69 24.08 80.04 90.93 02/22/2000 100.00 - none 33.3570.1 ZOELLER, KATHRYN 122.90 55.87 24.08 24,08 18.87 05/10/2000 55.08 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers May 16,2000 08:52am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name Last Pmt Last Pmt Balance Non-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg Grand Totals: 30,587.05 16,855.39 6,346.65 1,152.29 6,232.72 Report Criteria: Terminated Customers not included Customer.Cust No = {<} 9900000 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent June 2, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 1 G, 2000 APPLICANT -Department Report - Mayor Corrie ITEM NO. --- ' REQUEST Appointment to Planning and Zoning Commission AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City at Meridian. 'CORDED -REQUEST 017 ADA C004TY RECORDER J._�0eEEADEPUT' A�-, 100038 152009MY 18 PH `:�8 3 CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN CITY ORDINANCE NO. 9 74 AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT CERTAIN LAND LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT To THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; AND FINDING THAT THE OWNER HAS MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION IN WRITING To THE COUNCIL; AND THAT SAID LAND BE ANNEXED To THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R- 8); AND DECLARING THAT SAID LAND, BY PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BE A PART OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID PROPERTY To THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO; .AND DIRECTING THE CLERIC OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASURER AND ASSESSOR, AND THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT To IDAHO CODE SECTION 50- 223 AND SECTION 63-2215. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION I. FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation to the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the owner of said Property to -wit: PARCEL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED WOOD14A.VEN SUBDIVISION A parcel of land being situated in the Southeast 114 of the •Southeast 114 of Section 20, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho as shorn on that certain Record of Survey No. 4525 recorded as Instrument Number 99008926 'in the records of the .Ada County Recorder's office, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 20, thence North 00'00'18" West (formerly Imown as North 00°03' West in that certain Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument Number 8153524 in the records of ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-021) - 1 Ada County) along the Easterly boundary of said Section 20, 779.44 feet (formerly known as 779.51 feet on said deed) to THE REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said Easterly boundary North 89"47'41" West, 808.57 feet (formerly 1cnown as North 89058150" West on said deed) to a point; thence South 00'113 1 " West, 400.91 feet (formerly known as South 0'08'17" West, 401.14 feet on said deed) to a point; thence South 70°09'32' East, 61.34 feet (formerly kcnown as South 70011,30" East, 61.32 feet on said deed) to a point; thence South 63°22'02" East (formerly known as South 63024' East on said deed), 87.80 feet to a point; thence South 8623'32" East (formerly known as South 86035'15" East on said deed), 38.40 feet to a point; thence North 64°28'43" East (formerly known as North 64°26'45" East on said deed), 142.18 feet to a point; thence South 84°5 7'17 " East (formerly known as South 84°5 9'15 " East on said deed), 169.02 feet to a point; thence South 74004'17" East (formerly known as South 74'06'15 " East on said deed) , 113.6 7 feet to a point; thence South 68°54'17 " East (formerly known as South 68°5 6'15 " East on said deed), 207.43 feet to a point; thence South 72'01'52" East, 37.78 feet (formerly known as South 72'02'30" East on said deed) to a point on the easterly boundary line of said Section 20; thence along the easterly boundary line of said Section 20 North 00'00'18" West, 531.72 feet (formerly known as North 00°03' West on said deed) to the REAL POINT of BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 8.25 acres, more or less. ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-021) - 2 SECTION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby annexed and made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian hereinabove described shall be zoned Medium Density Residential District (R-8). SECTION 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City of Meridian in accordance ,with this ordinance. SECTION 5-. The zoning designation set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance is subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Development Agreement by and between the City of Meridian and the owner of the land described in Section 1 dated the day of &14t , 2000. 01 SECTION" 6: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8: The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a neap prepared in a draftsman manner plainly and clearly designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian, including the lands herein annexed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to -wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor and shall also file ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-021) - 3 simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and map with the State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho, all in compliance with Idaho Code §63-2215 and §50-223. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this , 2000. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of 2000. 167YL day of On this (Offi"' day of hvkg'' , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., lalovcm to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and aclalowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official 00msq 4 seal the day , vaV _ 4#above written. r+' PT � `, 0 nom; ��: (SEAL) NOTAR PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: s-" MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: lq 00 v'OFo� MSGIZAWork1M\Meddian 15366M\Woodhaven\AZGrd ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-021) - 4 Nlxyb oEP ATTE tfTY CLERIC SRELL STATE OF IDAHO.) ` 4 ar JS County of Ada. } , #� V,jj.j(rj�� On this (Offi"' day of hvkg'' , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., lalovcm to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and aclalowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official 00msq 4 seal the day , vaV _ 4#above written. r+' PT � `, 0 nom; ��: (SEAL) NOTAR PUBLIC FOR IDAHO RESIDING AT: s-" MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: lq 00 v'OFo� MSGIZAWork1M\Meddian 15366M\Woodhaven\AZGrd ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ -99-021) - 4 CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To: The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and The State Tax Commission of the State of Idaho I, WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Cleric, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, do herebycertify that the attached co of ordinance No. 874- 7"ZO � �yassed b the Cit Council of the Cit of Meridian, on theda of � y y y y 2000, is a true and correct co of the original of said document which is in the are, custody and control '� uric of the City of Meridian. ON SEAL µ N ILLLA�M G. BERG, JR.' Ir x NO COUNI-1 STATE OF IDAHO, ss. County of Ada, Qn this 160-3- day of � , in the year 2000, before me, 111 L dm a(Za �., lnj Z� , a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM .BERG, JR., known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and aclalowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. otj�; Owl (SEAL)t Air n a i 400 0# ,� 6ii000 ■nus* /16 Nota44ublic for Idaho Commission Expires: q --,1&7Q0 msg1Z:1Work\M\Meridian 15360M\Woodhaven\CertificationofClerkord CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CERTIFICATE OF CLERIC OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN I, the undersigned, do hereby certify: 1. That I am the duly appointed and elected Clerk of the City of Meridian, a duly incorporated City operating under the laws of the State of Idaho, with its principal office at 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. 2. That as the City Clerk of this City, I am the custodian of its records and minutes and do herebycern that on the da of , 2000, � y the following action has been taken and authorized: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR To ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND D.W., INC. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with D.W., Inc., denoted as "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are as set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL as follows: k 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with D.W., Inc.., entitled "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", by and between the City of Meridian and D.W., Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. Of W ILLIA.M G. BERG, JR/. BEAL CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, County of Ada, On this day of in the year 2000 before me kf�. UAa- -t 1� iGi." _ __, a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM G. BER6, JR., known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho, that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. (SEAL) + r '� 71f �►�E P� u CAI r� ok m s t 47 49, 2iov 19 4014801so Nota lic for Idaho Commission Expires: ,1'? -Zb`d0 msg/Z:IWorklMlMeridian 15360M\Woodhaven\CERTofCLICforRESOLU Resolution (AZ -99-021) - 2 of 2 .. .. ' Y• ^~•tom I - •_ - - C5 QgniLLI LLI 01 Q A(OOP)uCU1 0 cu C3 ~ LL- 2F Ld cg _ u jm r : - ' MI Z- 1--1 pq /rZ vcu I• r }- ��4. • ,-� _ I - - •. - . 33943 M.81.00,OONCY ••-'CD - " . - - F' : it , ti CY -;r"'4. ; .LO W CD wn• FTS ON CD CU CU Z V� ��a z cu WCP [U CO 1 .1. ! _ Jl�r_ �, h-7-•. ^• yam`• cu m cu q :r y.r q❑ C3 [! i.� a • ., _ -.r ye. . • _ .r~ }.S. T��.�yl - _ i, ti:j,w _ _ - -. r r - 'r r .. - •, ;` . . �.� w' '.�y,.a ,{. • ..., x' . J �,. L Y 5 it-' 'f .Y_ - •' -' r w =. L .�,. ��r =i ��• •�I ,_ ^' r -.,,batt d ; � ,i �y •- '•l r.• v �.y��ZC �'4,y': i4.r 'ir R - r�.� - C.• :.�. �• r• . ! r•. - - ^►y• � 4' _ ^'s� - � � ' .ry •_ r. �• .4 • } •..� `J'r; �' - •r ;• iia 2T"= F ^i iRi 'J' ;; rV - . `•ly`a �L 3' •x'uS � .� -f � �! 1 I �•r. •:w� ~,�r� • v i v r.• :•1. �'i.x• .�Y .,r' -y . .1 _ '7: !� rti 1' ` 7. .5? - .�•.- •�I� � _ , .�' - _ ■ � � i �i �ti: - .N~ y . �ti•.: • }�•t �ll4' "SF'r �y�r ,' -L•' +4 "'y � �• 7, �•t fit"' `.G:.• " •'t - Cy _ '�":• "��' ?` .. , �.:;; r.. ::{i . -, 'w - � .. '' - , � ; 1 .. ..} � F _ I t. s ,l • -'�9 . *�^ � 11 • � •� •.r - - - ,•.,.. ._ .fit,: :1 • , :"-. i'. - - _ _ 7 - _ - - " � - .. ''31.' � .� �,. - ,. - •'• .r ;ii!~, ''".k. .y; +�-'14. Kms•`'-� r �:_:� �� '.�= :� _ • _ •� .- �. -ii -. •'. r." •�_.• � ��.%"= r_ - �* �= �- ,... :�•=:=.�x.- '��•� r�4� J{'�`,' -x�i �aa�� { 7y• "k -„ - -fir .41' ter•• _�,� _ - _ •' 3 • - ±CJ.♦ �.'•-h^rjt{ �,. �!•` 11��q+,T. {'''�� _ _ ' J - - - •+1 w•/� :�/� - ...' _ - - _ _ i.��yr •1•/~ i�•�Y �i� .�f �.,,}=� J' -l" »a +s ' _' �.-�' - f r ' rr4 - t1"r"t - +. ••r: - _ 1� .>• , 'r , ..� r ''1, • r _ -'� . - • 7'' a�' ter: w .r - •,l. -4, .i .. ti,- .. ~I., ""3-." - :r•i"R. y;. ��- _ .. ek - - .. ..1'n r .�� ,.f3; ><%'� }• f• .. .. - •••i• . -f.L.� "� �7` ' •'p. .�,- � ter`• r'' - -. y..Z . _ _'i ..� _ - WILLIAM L. M. NARY 2140 N. Todd Way Meridian, ID 83642 Phone - (208) 888-5312 December 20, 1999 Mayor Robert Corrie City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Re: Vacancy on the City Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Mayor Corrie: Please consider this letter and my enclosed resume as my application to fill the vacancy on the Meridian City Planning and Zoning Commission. I feel that I can offer the Commission and the City of Meridian a fresh and informed Commissioner to fill this vacancy. 1 have been involved in the community of Meridian for 18 years and have resided here 14 years. Meridian has become not only my home, but home to my family. I have experienced the growth and changes to the community that have occurred over the last decade and more and would like the opportunty to participate in the continuing progress towards the future. The next century will hold many changes for the City of Meridian and I would like to be an active participant in those changes. I believe that my experience in local government, in both Meridian and the City of Boise, provide me with a tremendous amount of background in being able to serve in this position. I believe my long standing residency in the City will provide the Commission with a different perspective that may not be present at this time. I believe that my commitment to the City of Meridian can be used in a positive and helpful manner to place our City at the forefront of the medium size cities in Idaho as we move forward into the year 2000 and beyond. I will hope that you will give me your consideration in filling this vacancy. I would welcome the opportunity for an interview if you deem me capable of filling this position. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours truly, WILLIAM L. M. NARY 2140 N. Todd Way Meridian, ID 83642 Phone - (208) 888-5312 Lega1,.Expenen..q.e_- Boise city Attorney's office 1989 -present Current position -Assistant City Attorney Senior Attorney/Supervisor of a three-person attorney team with two full-time support staff persons. Our team is responsible for all the legal work for the Department of Planning and Development Services, Human Resources, the Boise City ombudsman and the City Clerk. 1 oversee the work of a lead attorney and additional staff attorney. I am conversant on the Land Use Planning Act, Idaho subdivision law, as well as the Boise City Planning and Zoning code. I also attend city Council and Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. I am the lead advisor for the Human Resources Division on all employee issues including ADA and FMLA issues. I also provide legal advice in disciplinary matters of general employees up to and including termination. I prepare legal opinions. Our team is also responsible for one misdemeanor criminal calendar that encompasses approximately 200 criminal cases. Team MemberslVerifters - Attorneys: Teresa Sobotka, Paul Fitzer; Support Staff: Lisa Norton, Adelen Coffin Prior Positions held in the Boise City Attome 's office Civil Deputy city Attorney Responsible for all civil legal work for Human Resources, Risk Management, Boise Airport, and the City clerk. Grafted ordinances, resolutions, agreements, leases, memorandums of understandings, and all other related legal documents. Worked with the Mayor's office and the City Council and the public to draft and implement the Boise city c Noise ordinance. Acted as Legal counsel for the Airport and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Represented the city in termination hearings of general employees. Advisor to Human Resources on all personnel issues that could lead to discipline. Legal advisor for ADA and FMLA issues. Managed risk management cases with outside Legal counsel. Supervisor/Verifier- Douglas Strickling Senior Deputy City Attorney/Criminal Division chief also Legal Advisor to Boise Police Department Represented the city of Boise in all Police Union grievance hearings and arbitrations. Prepared all briefs and memorandums for hearing officers of arbitrators and presented the city's case in approximately 75 grievances and arbitrations. Reviewed all police Public Information Requests pursuant to the Idaho Public Records Act. Supervised two operations supervisors for the criminal Division, 7 full --time prosecutors, and one (1) fine enforcement officer. Reported to the City Attorney in all matters. Involved in all manners of discipline of criminal staff including reprimands, suspensions, and terminations. Directed legal training on police policy, police liability, employment, and prosecution issues. SupervisorlVerifier -Amanda Horton and Susan Mimura Deputy city Attorney/Supervisor of Criminal Division Daily supervision of 7 criminal prosecutors. Responsible for the daily operation of the criminal Division. Worked closely with the Judges and the court personnel to streamline the court system. Helped and participated in systematic changes to daily operation of the Traffic Court. Worked closely with court clerks and Court supervisory staff. Reported to the Criminal Division chief in all operational matters. Supervised, managed, and hired all prosecutors during this time. Involved in all manners'of discipline including reprimands, suspensions, and terminations. SupervisorlVerifier - Susan Mimura Assistant City Attorney - criminal Prosecutor Responsible for a criminal caseload of approximately 250-400 criminal cases. Handled all phases of prosecution including but not limited to arraignments, pre- trial conferences, motion hearings, court trials, jury trials, and sentencing hearings. Worked with victim's and various community groups such as MADD. Supervisor/Verifier- Han. Thomas Watkins Ambrose Fitzgerald and Crookston - 1985-1989 Meridian, Idaho Partner 1987-89 Associate 1985-87 General civil private practice. Represented clients in all matters ranging from divorces to probate. Meridian city Prosecutor - 1985-1989 Prosecuted all criminal misdemeanor cases for the city of Meridian. Responsible for a caseload of approximately 150 cases. Handled all phases- of prosecution including but not limited to arraignments, pre-trial conferences, motion hearings, court trials, jury trials, and sentencing hearings. Worked with victim's and various community groups such as MADD. Education: • University of Idaho, J u ris Doctor, 1985 The college of Idaho, Bachelor of Arts, 1982 • The Kamehameha Schools, High School, 1978 Community Involvement • Umpire - Meridian Little League/Girl's Senior Softball - 1995-99 • Boise Valley credit Union Board Member 1997 - 99 President 1998-99, 99-00 Meridian optimist club 1985-89 Treasurer 1988.-89 • Meridian Gospel Tabernacle Member since 1981 Persona[: Wife.- Barbra Nary Children: Holli, Jessica Crysteen (Jacy), Elijah, and Elysia-Rose Professional References: Susan L. Mimura City Attorney 101 S. Capitol Blvd. P.O. Box 500 Boise, ID 83702 Ph:# 384-3870 Personal References: John T. Berg 778 E. Trinidad Drive Meridian, ID 83542 Ph.# 375-0550 (Office) Wayne Gibbs Planning Director City of Boise P.G. Box 500 Boise, ID 83701 Ph.# 384-3842 Kenneth C. Howell 7108 EI Caballo Boise, ID 83704 Ph.# 344-6000 (Office) June 2, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 16, 2000 APPLICANT Department Report -Mayor Corrie ITEM NO.—�- REQUEST Web Page AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS Materials presented at public meetings shall became property of the city of Meridian. June 2, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 1 6, 2000 APPLICANT Department Report - Gary Smith ITEM NO. . REQUEST WWTP - Digester/Clarifier Project Change Order No. 3 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS See attached Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 1?FCEJ-V1E1-J) JUN — 12000 CI'i'Y OF NIERIDM J To; Mayor Carrie From: vary D. Smith, PE CC: file Date: 00/02/00 Re: WWTP — Digester/Clarifier Project Mayor: Here is a requested change order to this project. This change deals with using imported granular backfill material under the Digester control Building rather than native material because of moisture conditions and the concern future settlement of the building. The time extension is requested because of weather conditions slowing the contractor's progress. I would appreciate bringing this item before the city council at their June 0th meeting, under my Department Deports, if that is acceptable to you. The Public Works Department recommends that the city council approve of this requested change order. Thank you and if you have any questions or need other information please give me a call. Regards, Gary Prom the desk of... Gary D. South, PE Meridian City Engineer Meridian Public Works Departrnent 200 E Carlton St, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-2600 (") 887 -MI Page ' Fa)c (208) 8871297 CHANGE ORDER PROJECT: Digester and Clarifier Facilities DATE: 5122100 OWNER: City of Meridian, Idaho NAME & ADDRESS: City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83542 CONTRACTOR: Turnkey, Inc. ENGINEER: Keller Associates, Inc. ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 197040 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Description: See attached Purpose of change Order: See attached RECEIVED MAY 2 ` ZOOU CITY I mcnwu+n ENQRJEER 197040/1100-401 052200 No. 3 Change Order (Rev 4/89) CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Original Contract Price: $ 31114,996.00 Previous Change Orders No. 1 to No. 2 k $ 24885.98 Contract Price prior to this Change order $ 3L1 39 552.98 Net Increase/Decrease) of this Change Order $.81511.00 Contract Price with all approved Change orders $--311481173.69 CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Time: 365 calendar days Net change from previous Change Orders 3 Contract Time prior to this Change Order 368 Net UncreaselDecrease) of this Change Order 63 Contract Time with all approved Change Orders 431 RECOMMENDED: ��"R ENGI NEER APPROVED: OWNER APPROVED: CONTRACTOR CHANGE GIRDER NO.3 197040/l/00-401 052200 Change Order (Rev 4/89) CITY OF MERIDIAN DIGESTER ANIS CLARIFIER FACILITIES May 22, 2000 PROPOSED CHANCES AND JUSTIFICATION Item 3-1 Place imported backfill under the digester control building $8,511.00 The digester control building is constructed immediately adjacent to the new mesophilic digester. When the digester was constructed native backfill was required in the contract for backfill of the digester. As the native backfill was very wet and difficult to compact, rather than risk future building settlement and wall cracking the Contractor was requested to place imported granular pitrun that could be compacted to 100% compaction. During placement of the imported material considerable rainfall occurred and the Contractor had to place filter fabric and chips to control side slope seepage so as not to saturate the placed fill. TIME EXTENSION Replacement of the control building backfill occurred in the rainy season when construction conditions were very difficult. The area was very muddy and considerably slowed the Contractors progress. In addition, side slopes began to seep and control measures were necessary to prevent saturation of the backfill. The Contractor was delayed for approximately 9 weeks during placement of the imported fill. A time extension request of 63 calendar days is recommended. 197040/1/99-686 ec 012000 TURN -KEY, INC."' 'General Contractors Construction Managers April 215 2000 Keller & Associates, Inc. 131 SW 5`h Avenue Suite A Meridian, Idaho 83 642 Attention: Dennis Swflikonen Subject: Meridian Digester 1 Clarifier Backfill Settlement Dear Dennis: Y ti. � Y ��,y � � i i ti � x � � • . 3 Turn -Key, Inc. agrees with your letter of March 10, 2000 for the basic settlement issues. Suzce the letter of March 1 0'', additional items have been discussed and the following items should be incorporated in a change order. 1. Total yards delivered 612 yards a@ $12.001yd. (See attached tickets) $77344.00 Voe 17 11.2 yards cobbles @a d. $$�- 40 yards chips @a V%Jtlyd. (See attached tickets) $ 4w.mr - T0`I'AI.. ssylad 2. Contract time extension of 9 weeks. January 21, 2000 to March 201, 2000. Our new contract substantial, completion date would be August 15, 2000. 3. Additional cost of fabric $ 397.00 Mark Up 15% $ 50.00 T'oEm! 815N Please issue a change order and check to complete the settlement. The previous change order issued to Turn --Key, Inc. was not complete. Brad Watson, of the City, was to review the costs that were disputed and get back with Turn -Key, Inc. To date we have not heard a word. Since ly, Dave C. - Erlebach DCE1mc Enclosures GATurnKey\9944 Meridian Digester\Corr+espondencc\KellerlBackfilI Settlementdoc OREGON OFRCrz IDAHO OFFICE 1551 N.W. 9th Street, CWarlo, OR SM 4 83?i 8 1189 Edge Ph. 541FAX 541-889-7755 PH. Rd, Emmettmmett ID PH. 208-365-1 S26 FAX 208-365-15V OF09 n Lic. # 101471 0 Idaho P.U. # 11414-AAAA-Za 6 NWada Lac,. * 003WW A June 2, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 16, 2000 APPLICANT Department Report -Shari Stiles REQUEST Discussion of Star Impact Area AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: COMMENTS Department Report ITEM NO. 9-q "` C-,_ See attached Materials presented at public meetings shall became property of the city of Meridian. FROM :DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • T � W a iirF, iaY 1...r,r.w...rr - -- AFAAN ram. rti aw. w �.sw � z fn WAM rr "op&• r..-r.r.rlrwrr -- dl-. 208364240S 19011: . -- 05--19 10:50 #2E4 P.02/02 aaa �J iLl. ru 1v SON LJ Priiurr AC'A Ate{{ 1X MW &.k lalllwd I, [`i k 4ri.. 1 ED Semkidvj Area 41 City Bits i t r • y e' J f .' r f r i rr /,• • f •,�10"/41r r r 1 r r Irl r't.t�rt /rri r • r./rrf a ,• J ::i.r.� fr �, lee 00, �'f /,y�, .f/r r f+f • r• �r r' %� r/J� /f !'! ! ! ,� J{ �i r %l�rr �I J ! r J. � f�lJf+ J r '%• f�/ {II ///• rX/r ff • f{ r r t IJP` ///} f//I ■ r /J /Y1 �rf/�, �! `/j:1� / rf r !f Owl. j///lf� rJfJ "r : ! f f �•��lt ✓0/ r r ri f/ r• f. dl .101 ►A / rfr ♦Z• f'r f•fir •rr / r' rJ,rJf % f• r/'fr•f�,i�f��/, rf! ./.J!fi•rrrft/fJ/lr/•J jjyJr / f /��r r 'rfrr/r� + J j i•f r r rr Jf r r r ~"�'arff� •r •i rrr/ //tr'`rrf/ r'J10 r -+• fr•JfrJ%`rr✓! jt'' rri rr•r,►rf�ra' rriry!�irlF +,rrf�Jfr,•rt� r r'1r 'r/ "/Ir/�rr {�r:%J f�r j•Jrfrtl// •f�rr�!/r/f. ` i�r 1ffr J'rr/ JFJf 1f f +J00 t/rr / ,• J�r�r' f r e/r J r I r r • � F •i/ r rlr! J!• � r r f r �/ % - / J J ljJi, , r /" ',re ••lrr. rr•'/ / �f•! J �/r%f • �' '�r rrf r �F I 'r� . J ` r/r •.• J J r ♦ r t / % r E r//ff/Jf!rrrf�/J/ J /�f �r/•rf�r► rrr !i rr fr rr •rf�r 'f/rr•,♦ J rr��:•: 1r/ fr i ri %/ ' r✓/rfJJr/, . �t/♦r• r!/ % J!!f •l��rrr ;r r /� ��1 / r ►/' %�rJ �/r/////////. • Jt / r%f�l�f r•r iJ•rr i r•r•� r//ff. / fr ��! r � f1 Jrf. f'r/ rr%r/l%f//r rrrfJ+ Jr�r r• ',fr/,/�,r%�r •rr, r 'ir .••r�J /• -r r �r'rrj'.ff.' tr! i r ♦',r .�•-P ■r '. Ir. r { Y J r' � J' �f / f��/r Ji j////�.r, � r/ F � /�1 r "! + r r / rr •f /r _•��++""�f/ ��{f/r r� f r i f r �!/Jt■rr%f J r +•t�.'%/rJ /t/'rfrr',rr. �JJ%/.�Jr rF J '' . 1•/r/f�tJr , l�/f//'i.r J•{'fi' '.'J'�l, Jrfr/�r1r:i�I //r//f/,•r rrr!r j1{/•!�/''/1 JJJ rrJ'rlrr if�i•r> rr '!rrJ / / i` /r // f!/ Jf�j'� r►' fr�'! r� fr ff/fr.!! % ��r.I'�rrJtr •�+•r�'f�/f''r♦/Jr�rffrf�r/�♦ r+♦/rr'rr�/f- J j,! t%'f.r%ry••�!t/% i. rr/r�/✓r � fff/•t J r,r';�r✓rJr✓± r .��,'�. �r f% f,r' f•T♦r% ✓f Hlr P. '2Z., ' '•Jfr.! .r' f ji• ' If / %rra Jt+/J rr / / rJ! ✓,f f / ` r/jj/ '.1r J• . r ,rf'. 1'r/J•J • /J frf. r'./ :l • / •J �•!!f; /r'rr` / i f ! r rrJ•rf!!fr� r/r!�!,r/ //,. r tr r �f /ti /frfr•I•Jrfir r.ji%fJ' ri rF+/j //rrr %f rfj■/f/ljI�!rrf,!f%r/l ��/f }% rr,;IrJ' fi�f{J!;//fl�,r� • /rr�ij/ a.%tJ�/r'-••f ! J!! • • ',%,r JJ ,• f r!/%�!JJ/JJrf/ r. rfJ�` r t y If/!r r f�f .�///JJ/•' ! rf�r'• . r�/JJ:. �r• r%�/I�J/ ! /'fv/f1r +/+r'r' �tJ t'i■ • !f/rIJif'J > rt// f'r%/t�rrJ/1 1/rrr /fI � •- ■f s/ /�✓ i`/,lr /..!•. 'r'r•• ► r //r/r i!r I ' jrJ '•JI+r ■ rrr:�tJr jr�r/f jrtJr'rf rfF rf jr. / fr r , r+ . �fr�r i - ♦ / �J r/f' /rr •r r . Jf%Ir �/�r./Jl!J frJrfr ri{r //rfr.•fJ r firr rrIrl%•J/► �r 5 r•,r'f 'rrJr ;rrrr•r t %r!fr r r /! rf�rr / •�/Jt J #4 / %r!%/r !J J 41' • !fJ ,.J J /f r x ■ I,rf ■ J Jef- JJJI r . t ' r.r r �' � I% r r ! r r J, � lr i f f � �t /� . j r . .%i� ;' �l�f • i rJ�i � ff'Jr .rJ'f %�J;r'!!r • •� • J / /•, .� J�ff! l�Jf t i Jr r 1rJ rr % J ■ ■ r r • r �/ / ! !• J / r i + r r• t ' • f f ! / ! !J /r ! Ji / rrt! • jI J f i rr : Jr r r rrf ! r� • • J J.t -•• r J r ! ' + r• rrr ■• i, + f l / `�J J f!•f %r r r Ir r •% ' t J 'r / J %, .! • `frfJ! !!JrlJi Ji!f•J•rlfffi /� Ir f ■ r/• r1 'Tr J f■ r j' r rrf JJJ Jrr , r/Jr .J rl: r J > r Jr , Jr� ' /f� J f rr%r I r, ! r JJ r/ t I• J f �l J� fJ f I/ J! r I J fJ�/�.y �• �y I f Jr/ lJJ f J / r f f •�t r' J r J J. r r r'�t t. J r!! !•/t J,t ! JJ �r rB LlI' I a /` !rrf / fJ J I J'fr j j r r f r Jr Fr r r •,r. /•/ !,% r J,J, • r r r!,.rfr F/.rr .. f• r r 1r f/ I� %• i J r J r �' r• /;r rj' ' f �•! ♦ r . • r / •r • • r r r • r . r • P. � �[ � >J � � r• r•• .. rfr� fr;i i; �f/ i � r'.+'+r• � f / f� l •J✓r f �. f 'r r fr %r / / f ✓r - .• r . ` • r r /• •r•; r ♦ r'r � r• J '^�•.{/ r. '• 1 J Jr rr r J r rrr ri ±f/f f / • rf ' j/ J�{/r,J r r�/� J r/• f /J�f/ r jr �rlrf rJ/• r f + ' ' /r! r / r rJr►// ♦' ! r/'. !J'rrrt trr fFr '• f { / f! ►>/rr !/J t J�'r" r r'r�f'r r: Jr/fr'/ rrr!Ir/r+fJ /ref •• r �r / , ,: J ,/ r r ` r rr r r r r r r r / � r • r r /, r •, ✓ I r • ,J r r ,r r•% r ' rrr i rf !{Jf,r� • rr i'i ! r,' ft Jl! ft�}l, r, ;J!,Jr/ I J'�%,1•/ /J ! ,r / J•. J�/i !! /��• r f 'f,. r rr• J; / jrrr • rj/r4•J,j/ rri•' r • r rr r •rr' f!f : rri': //JJJ • J.J.:; rr r• r,r• r. r: f: I r r r ►r r J r J• /• r': !/ J J t• , rr J r,!' I + r ,J I + �r ■ r y _•r r• : , ■ r ij'J'' . r//'i r I• r. : %r r .+ Ji J r{ • j'• r f! f t •r r +••v +• ■,■ • r l r ! f r ! r ! r r 40' ,J r . r r • ; r •r•' 1 ! •• r't r J ` r , ' r rr r .1...- .. !' , .. • �• J J J Jrfr ' r + • . • J J r • Jr J • // r' r r r r r r�, r �' ;'',• r i • ! •; : / t•rr •r - .f r ''r ' r I J t , t r r r J. :tt' I rJr •' r I : i t•.' I'. r %' • . ;:r l r r r i • •�L' - ♦' J' './rrr r } r'! JfJJ r / I / r ' t f J I r r rt r• f i J,r rrr [ .,r . ,J r/rrr+■ . r f"r fJ '/•!►%JJ/. •r.+1 tt! • J;! f'! r l r �. I I', ••• .,ti r . ; j ■ J • /'f r i ' r , f / '�' - r rrt;r J,I,. I + r,! r r',►• r r ! ♦•, r • r�t' ' ■ 4 r• P. •r- � r 1 ! I t f r / � �r �J ! / r' " r ! r .� :rr',! ♦ Jr 1 f ' �+' •� : 1 %J': • J� r' r rrr • Jf •_r�. •r,, If f /•J J�r Jj r t Jti 1/'r / J Jr rrf rJlrr'rr I ':1.IIr r JJr %Jrir,/ rr ��J r r!: Jf tJf -. t :J•, / rrt! !J f.40I { . ■ 1:: 1'r r r r r • r / i r . r • r,. , r,J,r ,r,r,J'/,• r% / i f r' .. ,.. , 1 r.Jt 'r , - rr •. !!I1*f t' -r '• 1.- .r• 5; ,•J,r. ril• ■ f= it :ice y: 'r«»' !/f f frr.J,i 'I '+'rtr; f►'.'r'f•r,. r,: J • r r,•• r r,Irr ��7^^r /ii. r r,. t.,. 1. r-.,'.,1 ':r +' .ti :� ■•• .r yr ,• I. I .I . rti 11• i•- J.,►,! J . r rr r .•,r I , •r••,�' ' f . r' 1�!•J;1 rt rr, + a t �rt� rrr•':e; fr; •,. .': .'l. /': J�i:r'r.�,�r•, f• •l.•. ,� i•f; •J•�, - • r • .• ��' �'1.-- '- � M '1►•• r ► • , -_ - �� \ Ff +r• J f r//rrr✓, /'f •r!I j� J / r �r r rrr f - •` r .��' . r / : f r r ,r •r Ir ■ • 1- •:• : r. t-�f r • i/ .f /rr frf/ r J ! f • r r'✓' r yfr . �r r : •r-/rrffr• r /f+r .. ,.,y' � _ ♦ e r ✓�rr r f •' i t :'•r ♦ / %/+%J':' •Ef•�+ �•i 'J!r tf� •,f ' f i 1 f rr �/,r ±•f J% - a� r•' •''•' r �-••• �••/ �: •,..••,'r .:. .. .. v �'// r/rf rf,.r� i•t r/ r'r 11 ' J. !!a•. .J : _4r1 ..,•«+•'t %r I. !4 r: 'i .ii_.'r ^f^ •rj•r•!r .'•' / /�•r r•'' •r •',' i• ' •' '-•• • rl.. :" , �,,: fir' •• r� •:.r, %/ : J.•r J.►i•f.rrJ J%tf r r j rr'r trrr f.r i .•�• f, ; ! rtL .• ••�;_ ` ■� F ,� �•��"•,• r �i .-. -• r.r, 1 r ". ..•. r• I j •i." i -J I J: r J'• %l?J r: •'�'••• • rJJ,• 'J•ri •,f J!!. ire,-.i•.•r + r 'r. :J•: ' :. r e. r' ,•r r +� Feather ..t r •w, �• :i :'., t.... i....•I J �f . r♦ f, r % rr r'�. �J. •, • .i• _ r � -,.•• �.r' I ■• �: i �•ti• ~ter• .7 ter'. �J ! •• J•:': •J' • •'r• ' : r•,r• ' ' r, ! i , r r r• r• �.�e,,y �v ..� 'r �. _ ' % f i % J'J r'/ . r 1� 1,. ,r r • ! r r r r I ■ .• r r W f .I• I, . . v r ' •,r ... r �, • •1•.',! r '•�v.• •. \ +!'•' .• •. ,►. flJlj•, �.!% ,lfr• J J r •rr/ • .•r/,'ter. ri r r•�r'•. ; ! . ,.' • 1 f': •'-.la � ��.. ' .t 'i � I�_• :�.. •� / / /// ff r'!r" rl J r I •••r' i r •w1. i••' � •�„• .rr^ r.• �► �{.■ � r;'� • � ryr' � •., .- r �; ,. ' I.,'► . � ., . �J r r J J, r J f'•� r / r i - !! 1• r .f r / J !' J♦• r r • '�' I • • � -..• i w■ I../ �_: ! • _ r. .tl; •:�.�' �t ! ! I/! J/ l i l ,lt! J J •,J I' J r f 7 • i.,:.� � •r -�: /,: �� r t J •- r r J�� f r J I J J 1 t r r�/ J t,: ,l , r r -' •• r •',r'�r' •r• .. r' I�v. :'':.: •' �4,. + 'r t•/Jr/i ✓!f% 'tJr t,Y r/, •Jt r••f ■ ••r'•ir'!/r. ,. •'-.^ -• ..• P. .r•'•L:,• •.. ^-.1„ `,.. •,Jr' .,.�..- /':;.�J///I.I,r + !r•r r '1, +.•t J I I•• r.11;: + „rr'�' ` .i r. •:.!„'w�, .r, ..,rr 1 ♦ r r e t•. 1r J r - % , r /_'%r 1 r l ! i r •. • r,r -r r 1• •\r.•r r r •r+. ' r : f fJ r . • 'r'� • ••-rti.r+.♦I �• - r a■. •-•��..'rrrl r,-.-,;��: •.�-��t..�• r••-,, EKE ••• JJJ/ r /r!/ >j !% r ! tJ /J J J•r/ ' I• llll JJJ•!• • J•.•J•r.•. j� nr1• �.�! {trT f'r. 1.•. •••1'r•' • 'r f'f/ l r / f/t f /. !t i•J f!J 1 1'•i _ `J I•. •� '« • •• i" I '�',ti �• .. ` r• .:► ,•tir w: {•� r .; r:. r jfr" Jr!'! + . I J J rr JJ J f % J,r% ! r I• + •,�, ':+?,' "i Y I,r:• 1 I t■ �.r� +� �i. •� 't r r ^I ��•r',. •. j 11�I r lll r I r % r r' ll ll rJ 1 1l: /110, r J fJ i r , Jf/ ff,• frJ f ! J fr! J £ f! /r rJ,JJr t /r •! ■ I r . v• •r. -» •.1 •":+ 11..•tiw.•i ti f �+�Y'r ».i �ir'• J�'✓'/r//!• f r' !JJ �/ JJ/• ffJ J J,J/'11�• r• if/r T r•. • r. •. ,.. 3 •, �f.l II .. 7•'IR 1 . .I �. ...• . r t . t . I r . I r,fJ r �l,frJ,. ,l+r,J,'J•e r!'/ frr•f r `f✓r' i -�.,r• „ 'rj•. 'r ■ir I r J - J ....7 p. 'rrh7.:r •.+,� •r'.v r �•rr ,r •�r�. .�. „•r •'• !/ 'r rdf r r rr'/• • ��.- H.r:" .�,-krf• 1:.. ., . .r: r•r !/I I J't•I;? rlrJ•r I. •J,J;.r,:r. " r •-', r 4 r 1m'•r, :. .I �. rr'J•'• J••• r J'I f r J• ' r ! • fir, •; ».••• .ti ', r .• •+ r .r•. • i " i r r r'r r'• r r.►y�1• .n I. r1 ■�.i.• •tip~ •I, •• •' f •J!i .J• .!: •r r J•,�/JJJ r.•'.''..■� .r rr-T: �ryr •• -r4�,. fl^ r �: } �� , :rrJ/Jrrr t J. ' r r �•�•� •�� - f:«». SM as• 1•+��y •• j+ ,I{ .r. .;ti. rJ. f:/ .�f% rr r. • _ _ r 1 ',r •.1 .1 ,. r '� r•. - �; 4; -r-:f. '` _ •1:'.^ ."�'•• rf J i i! J Jf Jf fIf r,. �'- �, ,. .y ,L- \J„••�•• r t , •: r r . i rrfr i / .'o. r •w -:} . re 1 r ., f.� • J ' r r ff . r' ■• 1 r - ••► - LL. 1 1 T �t.' %r. '�� f+'I 'ii-+� �J •r, r' -. f...•n � •:r '• r � 'l �'• ,.• �•;. r 1 .•yr .r..- .r,r. "_ r: '� 7.. I 1 �• •� -.+ \.:. ..Yr, • r. ,%' ' r' _ ` t,r • r t r J r', ■..fes r ti r �[l^:r . v •' I .:,1 . Aa'►. I J rJ/ ✓ .••f.•' r •r . -' ,• , r �� 1 •. I , .►.• •,1 r.. ►\err r • 1 «4 • .i •\rl,v•• [,, .r•1 .r'.,:11•-.' ••J• rte' ��'-- . I f�J •r r•'J� !r `rrJr �+J•'i' r•' •i1 r ••�«.::M:,}li.`0.r�:T�,1.:..:1,•- •L_•r•�•:. .:�}r', .,•� ■,: r ♦ 1.• ,r•��r'J r �r, ,r, .[ % .►..»_,• •'' •�r •': '1^•':r .1 .. ■-. J 1 r`.0p %• , r J . /t ry �y . + r - •� • r , ••-.- � .r .�_ •.' j .. ,.•\r1 ,, •�• r•. r. ti,■' 1r. r • •r � � � /Jr %t,: 1. 'f l.r r 'Jr 1 :•' • ...� ' r•I . •I.. •r •'�•'~ • ..r.. •'Ji� isrJ: ••�• . - •':'• « rt' • rrjJ'r'I .-' ryr• rr. /,! t + r %•i i rI .. �t•„ ~~ 1.:r:. „ • ~ _ _ = • :� �'•1,..• _[. I'i' • '•:. •'� f ; ► �.J; 1'. _ r, r J r y. r , r • t ,rrr. �t .�,. �■•1• - J �•�rw r 1 rLF•. .._ •► ..^.._.:; �lJ + r J r ; n 'J .r'r! "•• J''rI r r- f. -�' /•'■ ,r.•. .'i .v+.� . J �r, 4• _ S • r •' ��r' rir• % ►,. r t, - rr!•J'. .,, .. �� :,• ... •- .11_1,' r,:r+•.. .. ••� I ♦ .•, •;_1■w.-. .� • : r.'; • j r' J• /, r .. V7 ti �» d • r, •� �,., _µ r , . a� rr / r ■ r, r f / rrr � /;• / s .:.• r'• .. ' '{ .r►• 1 j •4.•� ',' Ir •rL:rr titi �• ?- ti, rte• ' •1•»7' P. trP r ,• r •ll ':1. : ,r •:. ti •r.•' �4 { r rrff r.l•. 'ry�. I I 1 ' /\• «=y •_ rw.� J r ~ rirrr/rr, rr/`ffr•J/r�f��j 'rr-� r ti -'�. •, r.l: �1•• ^r,� \y•'C_ %� ■ %: r';' .Z• ..w+rti• �.' ifJlJ •r1�f l' J I••`f rr r•r r'+rr �[r�'�_ 11� ' ' ' S: Iti.,.r ' •�' ti y..• .: , r\ - {r„ ; ✓'r r{ r frr+ r/ �. '� • J r • : r r r 1 ' . r r r :. I. r•' J\ ■ .;i'.a• f,.. • • I,r rt' • rr! ' / r f r J/ ' • %/ ' rr ♦ r', y r ., ,y_ . ..1.. `r ' :.: I�r �. Ir .;.� ;r`� .• ��. . •.•. I il yA�+ P :� ';., , 1 �"�. 1• , 'r'1.%'1.� f + !�//r + ,r r►�`r. rJ �`+•JI r .r• F :,1. '+•':•. 1, " Com•• -J' 1 L :r..1 .•r !f tJ• f,. rr' rri + r ✓• r•r r t r • r . • . -r .. . •,ti, ... •: '. r r ';• 'r .., '.`r .. 1 !,r r r r✓-.•rr -r✓ r'r _ '' •. ' r.. .. f rr r // J • ri r+ r r. . r f r r• ' ✓ r .• rri r v/ • r r •. •.rµ w •. 1,•,. 1 r•r'1 rr• 1111,• .•r:' ,rhr-r. �•: J f r� / rj t•f J • I • rJ I !/ I•r % • • '+ f ./. • �r • .•r.•/� rr . .•Jrr/. 1 r �• I•: r ,, r r• Ir• •ice %r r.� /let, r�i r',• fr rI 1 • �/ •rf•rr ■.J�'•'.r! J• V //'0I rr. / r rrr•. r rr f.�r.�.�i!r'• `rrr �rj tJ r r, .+• ■'/ 111 1 'Y� !.•.�- . r. :r • . �.:, 1. �JJ /j• .J.r� trf! r t j J f•Jfrt� r f 1 • j / r,r • I r r r f r 'i. ,t r,• 4„ 1...»•r••..'.. ,+' rr r..- ✓r ! i , r r• r I J / i . �:;,•_-.1.�►"•..'•••r•e.••r'�.• ' r: r rr r r 1 !rr'r• Jlt r' /rt. 'Jrlff fJi fJ'•'•� r f• J• r • l f r ffJ'r ! e e I J I l r ! t/ r• t J/•,. Ir ..� +•• ..{. r' •„••■.� 1. •.rr-r, v. f rf; t I J !�! J!!%/ !•J;%fll /t !1 rj".�lf•.rI/ - r l • / r / Jfl r ! J J ! ! i•r f rr ! r J 1 Jr j j • . J,r ! J�i'/ ''t JJ r•'J JJ r f r /ff Jr{ • r r : r,i -r . Jtr /: t r r r,•, rrtr• r r' •ti: 1}•• �•■ fWO 1%t •J •!•!t/r fJ� ! rIJ�J/''JJff%I! 1-ftJ%frJ f1 it rli! r _ • r' �� "- _ti' r. .�.♦ rl 1,•.: JJ I/ r! IlJf r J!! '! !tJ! 1 ! 'JJI r• J Il !jJ i 5 '! ,_ _.� • ..• ;r+�••'•• 'r■'» 1 lr ► !/ %i r ff �J j !{r r/� •J�-�' •r !,r•r! :, r ... fry 1 ii�d•{. • � _''f .ti.. ti'r«... 4.1• ❑ { I l •.. • .r,:•,,,,• ry{ �'r� r ' • • r:'ti' f fff // " ` ' %r�' f%J r rj,f i r //JF1•,r1J- r +�.•r-►r _'r • 7 r . + . r Jr /. rrf / i f • r i rrf lJfr/r• r,fr��fr+ , r r • r r f �� r�j e �• �-,••,•r•• f r • . r � � {r / .• r r' . r' . ,f + r r ■ r r ► r op r f .r• F• r•r r r f We Of // % rj�/ r/rr r.rr�fJ �• r! /r rrlr i� • r. % % Irl J r•■'/!. r'r r' + f •';r rrr f,rr/ r//� / f t r• ♦ J • , �'r r r +•,/rf rI/r.= �• f / /// t ,r r r f r ►rr jt/�/f t J/ J�'� % r ' r/• f � �J/ /rffriiitrf J✓-i��rr• /J r/ Ir + r f% r•+�•. /rr fJ/••/✓rf i• rr • r r or, f•rte, X/z . '^�• r f r !rr %'r' rf !�fl rr.' j 'r i• • / f/r /frf "f/ ✓ .✓,', rf r//Jrr: 1 1 /: r % r t{. I r ri / / r + I �/r ,'ft rfr/It/,• '/+ f' •• f rrf•/./ J�tr%rr rrr /fir' f•f rr'�: %% /rrf r Jr�r� f Jr !r ✓JJ .,,f f/f r+•✓� /l• r •f• f "Ffr % / r f ff / rJ jJr I % r . , •rte%er.0' r r r r r r J r /J//% %J✓/ Tr Tti•LL J� f /r r•j r•.�1,/ r . �• •�r ,i{r r •iJ� * r V f!f-F .• • / JJ .rI! lr////ffJ///%f/ rrr./ i it �i JJ f l t •r . "• r • / r /. 1 r r•ri".`IJ f rfl: •t rrlfr. f• r/ r 'Pr -• r .! //rte/J r ,f r f•/ f �r • t J '% r r••.r• t• r• r r J J J' r . ✓ I'♦ i J f r.!rrrr ■ !• I-. + r am'•! f!' rr•r r J r•''. r'rrr' oo rJrr f IFf+-'�.J:• 1' •4fr r'ir♦. ►J/ rr rrtff. • f r r !r +r+r •r.rrj•LL- Z I r I I' I J • r r f r'r / I rrr ! ,' ' ,f I r• -•, t r i;f rr ,.j,r;r,!•r f{. �•r r t • J t r• Jrr . 4 i ..r frJ •. rr••rtrr !rr•/ /.,/, � •�r '% K y• •' r r 'r r'/ rrf rrfr • . r t r j �%J rJ %J ff I •%:.! : r/;r .• ! /;. ;•r•rr�i Jr~r f.lr I,. !I • { r J r.'.r J • f / / t ! J ! r r / J I/ r%r•i r f,I • f J% / Jrr /%/' fJl�!! r/ ■!J r •'r ! i'J `r r j■/t/%/� I/rr� r r /!~ t r! r f�r:r �r r{ �r r• . "l.F1.r� + J r rj✓-•!J.'r:'f r! •r• "•' r-?• I,'IJr'rr •'/,! f'{'r•;t.�{ ✓1?Llr I f ' � I FROM :DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ��2083642406 19r'JS-19 l��c��'et�I.EJU -�. I�,,�.L� .�� .�U VL;R STET ]FROM: MAY 19 2000 Orr OF muft ADA COUNTY DIEVELOpNjTpI A Nri+i�� c�� lYT SERVIc )Es � 6501VXAIY STREET BOISE W 83702 &'/CW f�- �— � (208) 36=12?77 OF (2 o) FAX (?OS) 364-2406 i TO: NUNMIER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: / NOTE: / MAY 1 6 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR 05/17/00 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, May 16, 2000, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on May 17, 2000, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (-No response.) MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or, have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $13,731.66. *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers May 16,2000 08:44am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No 9900000 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Nan-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 21.0184.1 ALLEN, ROBERT 130.88 96.84 34.04 - - 02117/2000 34.04 - none 51.0050.1 AMYX FAMILY LIMITED 558.31 - - - 558.31 - none 21.1784.1 ANDERSEN, SHARRON 114.75 72.77 26.38 15.60 - 04/19/2000 60.00 - none 68.0070.1 ARES, TONY 198.83 115.43 37.87 45.53 - 04/10/2000 40.00 - none 21.1930.2 BAILEY, BRUCE 742.95 610.53 47.06 85.36 - - 21.2736.1 BAILEY, MICHELLE 212.11 157.00 37.87 17.24 - 05/11/2000 25.00 - none 3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 213.96 156.94 57.02 - - 02/24/2000 112.81 - none 69.0484.2 BARBER, CURTIS 111.91 97.35 14.56 - - - 46.0448.1 BEERY, LON 118.25 85.02 33.23 - - 04/13/2000 20.57 - none 2.5690.2 BELL, DERRICK 93.00 65.39 27.61 - - 02/24/2000 42.54- 2.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 97.11 59.24 37.87 - - 02/11/2000 55.36 - none 4.1294.1 BLASER, GLENN 154.77 67.85 86.92 - - 03/06/2000 301.05 - none 21.3290.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 243.35 186.86 56.49 - - 02111/2000 195.00- 31.0512.1 BOKMAN, HELEN 195.91 138.34 57.57 - - 04111/2000 50.00 - none 51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI 202.35 170.86 31.49 - - - 4.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 242.49 132.96 60.85 48.68 - 04/19/2000 100.00 - none 34.1844.1 BUFFAT, STEPHEN 306.42 236.38 70.04 - -- 04110/2000 70.04 - none 19.0976.1 BURGUNDY HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - - 69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 86.04 57.36 28.68 - -- 02/07/2000 92.47 - none 32.1452.1 BYRNE, JASON 96.50 72.42 24.08 - - 02/29/2000 27.91 - none 20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA 65.49 54.64 10.85 - - 04/2012000 24.08 - none 48.1610.1 CB FINANCIAL DEV. L. L.C. 1,474.08 1,127.29 346.79 - - 04/04/2000 1,482.50- 33.2620.1 CECIL, ODETTE 140,75 126.81 13.95 - _ 03/15/2000 31.58 - none 2.1770.1 CHERRY LANE LAUNDROMAT 940.51 699.79 240.72 - - 04/11/2000 282.85 - none 50.0206.1 CLARK, TERRY 79.90 55.82 24.08 - - 04/10/2000 24.08 - none 74.3304.2 COMPARATO, BRYAN 76.92 66.71 10.21 - - 05/01/2000 20.00- 51.0286.1 CROW, DAN 90.02 62.11 27.91 - - 03/21/2000 31.74 - none 51.0998.1 CULVER, WALTER 93.40 57.83 35.57 - - 03/28/2000 77.90 - none 21.1520.2 DAHM, VIRGIL 87.47 63.39 24.08 - - 03/01/2000 24.08- 42.2388.2 DALY, BERT 249.57 73.19 176.38 - - 02/09/2000 206.19- 64-0002.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 125.23 - 17.47 16.88 90.88 - none 4.0564.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - - 22.1420.1 DAVENPORT, DUANE 149.62 68.13 34.04 34.04 13.41 04/13/2000 75.00 - none 1.0770.1 DEUBER, THOMAS 135.86 - - - 135.86 - none 2.1721.1 DR. BARRY SAMS 10.17 - 10.00 - .17 12/13/1999 43.62 -- none 42.3106.1 DUNSTAN, JOAN 87.47 63.39 24.08 - - 04/11/2000 39.40 - none 74.3370.1 ECHIPARE, DOMINADOR 121.60 78.20 41.70 1.70 - 03/14/2000 50.00 - none 34.1898.1 EDINGER, REX S. 107.22 59.56 24.08 23.58 - 05/11/2000 60.00 - none 15.0022.2 EMERALD HOMES INC 76.89 18.51 21.94 24.08 12.36 04/24/2000 18.51- Z01801 ENGLISH, RONDA 122.42 4.60 2.30 36.38 79.14 10/18/1999 32.69 - none 52.0250.1 FIRST SECURITY BANK 25.92 12.96 6.48 6.48 - 01/20/2000 6.48 - none 74.1316.1 FULLER, NORMAN 109.44 27.36 13.68 13.68 54.72 10/19/1999 122.07 - none 31.2250.1 GARCIA, ANOTONIO 267.53 179.87 87.66 - - 03/23/2000 106.81 - none 21.3048.2 GARLICK, LEWIS 522.62 207.77 82.34 99.15 133.36 04/11/2000 100.00- 32-0732.1 GLASER, DELMAR 142.18 98.95 43.23 - - 04/11/2000 50.89 - none 69.1703.1 GLENCO INC. 110.57 40.50 - - 70.07 09/24/1999 554.95 - none 13.2028.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 02/22/2000 43.23- 3.23-15.0002.1 15.0002.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 02/2212000 58.47- 13.0022.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - - 33.0332.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 80.83 54.64 26.19 - - 02/2212000 50.64 - none 33.0102.1 GRAND AUTO 551.07 444.54 106.53 - - 03/22/2000 106.53 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers May 16,2000 08:47am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 31.3036.1 HASSIS, BENJAMIN & PAM 5.0722.1 HOLLEY, DAVID 51.4250.1 HOME PRO PLUMBING 74.1146.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 74.1202.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 50.1706.2 HUNT, STEVE 20.1894.2 HUSTON, ADDY 50.4505.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 3.0012.1 JENNI, TERRY 51.3082.1 JOHNSON PROPERTY MGMNT 1.0220.1 JOHNSON, MILDRED 2.1890.2 JOHNSON, STEVEN 2.3120.1 KELLEY, DAVID 34.3212.1 KERBS, DAVID 21.2728.1 KESLING, SCOTT & MONICA 34.0452.1 KLUM, ALLAN 74.0670.3 KNOLL, HARVEY 22.1524.2 KOCH, CARL 2.6030.1 KRASOWSKI, TOM 1.0890.1 LANTZ, STAN 2.1970,1 LARSON, KERRY L 33.0108.1 LARSON, TIMOTHY 22.0332.1 LEE, MICHELLE 33,2348.1 LEDER, RHONDA 31.3354.1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 31.3496.2 LETTICH, KENNETH 33.2278.1 LEWIS, RIK & CAROL 2.0448.1 LLOYD, BRADLEY 32.1320.1 LUKE, DAVID C 74.3072.1 LYTLE, CHAD & STACEY 2.4480.1 MADRID, JOSEPH F 5.0268.1 MANOS, PETER 21.1878.1 MARSTON, KELLI 34,0994.1 MASON, DREW & VICKIE 1.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 31.2192.1 MCMILLAN, VICKI 33.2402.1 MCPHERSON, JO ANN 20.1664.1 MEDLEY, STEVEN 69.1249.1 MER GRNS #3 HOMEOWNERS A 69.0981.1 MERIDIAN GREENS HOMEOWNE 69.1659A MERIDIAN GRNS HOMEOWNER 74.3246.1 MEYER, JOHN & LISA 31.0568.1 MILLER, NEIL 40.0202.1 MONTES, KENNETH 74.2832.1 MOONEY, KEVIN 32.0804.1 MORGAN, CHARLES 2.0526.1 MOSSI, DAVID L 31.0726.1 NITZ, JASON 50.1464.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 50.1456.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 21.2744.1 ORTON, JOHN & LARAINE 46.0240.1 PATTERSON, RYAN 4.1240.1 PEARSON, RONALD 74.3000.1 PHILLIPS, RICHARD 22.1564.1 PITTI, JOHN JOSEPH *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Balance Non-Delin❑ 02129/2000 0113112000 12/31/1999 Date 129.46 93.89 35.57 - 571.82 260.53 69.57 59.23 311.36 206.46 103.23 1.67 1,772.09 1,393.04 379.05 - 196.26 179.63 16.63 - 75.60 48.16 24.08 3.36 98.08 71.70 26.38 - 929.92 - - -- 108.41 90.97 17.44 - 81.86 57.78 24.08 - 115.35 - - 34.08 124.56 81.33 43.23 - 371.79 - 40.60 35.57 78.72 54.64 24.08 - 133.62 95.75 37.87 - 245.03 - - - 104.86 55.15 24.08 24.08 112.37 84.46 27.91 - 130.33 96.60 33.73 - 76.76 54.64 22.12 - 125.73 94.03 31.70 - 80.99 - -- - 124.68 85.28 35.57 3.83 78.99 59.84 19.15 - 90.07 62.16 27.91 - 66.27 54.64 11.63 - 140.45 95.14 45.31 -- 139,57 101.66 37.91 - 88.39 55.45 32.94 - 92.81 62.60 30.21 - 109.77 71,86 37.91 - 313.84 207.24 106.60 - 300.00 - - - 1'11.14 77.06 34.08 - 68.80 54.64 14.16 - 194.48 139.80 54.68 _ 152.01 97.54 54.47 - 136.78 95.89 40.89 - 44.76 8.10 - - 62.94 3,24 - - 77.11 11.34 - - 187.32 129.53 57.79 127.28 87.88 39.40 - 101.56 73,65 27.91 - 126.11 84.63 41.48 -- 162.14 118.91 43.23 - 258.70 184.83 73.87 - 126.27 55.87 24.08 24.08 234.70 219.79 14.91 - 633.63 413,48 220.15 - 89.03 - 22.65 26.38 260.97 - 22.65 36.38 143.90 96.03 47.87 - 116.07 78.20 37.87 - 267.79 184.96 82.83 - - 04/10/2000 182.49 05/02/2000 - 02/15/2000 - 05/01/2000 - 05/01/2000 - 04/20/2000 - 03/2812000 929.92 - 03/07/2000 - 04/19/2000 81.27 11/18/1999 - 04/13/2000 295.62 12/15/1999 - 01/12/2000 - 04/10/2000 245.03 1.55 - 04/13/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 02/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 80.99 04120/2000 - 04/03/2000 04/25/2000 02/25/2000 - 04/13/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 03/10/2000 300.00 04/20/2000 - 02/16/2000 01/03/2000 04112/2000 - 04/20/2000 - 04/11/2000 36.66 09/29/1999 59.70 10/19/1999 65.77 10/19/1999 - 04105/2000 - 02/24/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 05/05/2000 - 03/29/2000 22.24 03/06/2000 - 03/20/2000 - 03/20/2000 40.00 11/09/1999 201.94 03/22/2000 - 02/10/2000 02/14/2000 10/26/1999 Last Pmt Amount Msg 43.23 - none 75.00 - none 101.56 - none 67.52 - none 90.50 -- none 50.00- 70.42- - 0.00- 70.42- - none 100.00 - none 26.08 - none 54.59 - none 70.04- 140.00 - none 48.16 - none 55.27 - none - none 47.91 - 60.00 - none 370.00 - none 50.00 - none 10.00 - none 35.57 - none 24.08 - none 62.47 - none 70.00 - none 219.34 - none 24.08 - none 70.42 - none 88.93 - none 187.02 - none 57.35 - none 168.56 - none 69.71- 57.87 - none 59.92 - none 64.00 - none 58.23 - none 60.36- 713.57 - none 23.24 - none 60.89 - none 35.57 - none 53.00 - none 78.23 - none 85.36 - none 89.37 -- none 158.92 - none 158.72 - none 85.76 - none 50.00 - none 116.07 - none 68.08 - none 245.87 -- none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers May 16,2000 08:50am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Nan-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 3.0332.1 PORTER, DAVID 120.71 85.14 35.57 - - 03107/2000 73.74 - none 3.0116.1 PORTER, TAD 104.63 74.42 30.21 - - 02/09/2000 93.23 - none 20.0210.1 REED, RON 153.55 106.49 47.06 - - 04/1212000 31.74- 64.4062.1 REMARKABLE HOMES INC 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 32.0458.2 ROAM, JACQUELINE 9'1.95 81.03 10.92 - - 01/03/2000 165.00- 2.0970.1 ROEPKER, DAVID 128.79 71.86 27.91 29.02 - 04/28/2000 100.00 - none 51.3310.1 ROGERS, MILDRED 68.64 45.76 22.88 - - 04/05/2000 22.88 - none 50.0154.1 RON SMITH CONSTRUCTION 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - - 19.7156.1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 87.47 63.39 24.08 - - 03/13/2000 17.60- 33.2324.2 SAUNDERS, KELLEY 125.79 90.22 35.57 - - 04/13/2000 47.06- 1.2260.1 SCOTT, DAVID 104.03 55.87 24.08 24.08 - 03/15/2000 53.90 - none 1.2040.1 SERMONS, DOUGLAS 118.49 87.87 30.62 - - 05/11/2000 37.00 - none 74.2890.1 SHAFFER, ROBERT 107.94 80.03 27.91 - - 02/07/2000 95.22 - none 34.0724.2 SILCOX, BENJAMIN 91.16 63.25 27.91 - - 02/07/2000 24.08- 21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 123.02 100.51 22.51 -- - 03/16/2000 111.07- 2.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 123.31 87.74 35.57 - - 04/10/2000 43.21 - none 2.4360.1 SMITH, ANN ETTE 180.38 91.31 89.07 - - 03/17/2000 302.88 - none 31.0134.1 SMITH, BRADLEY 152.04 112.64 39.40 - - 04/1312000 50.89 - none 22.1270.1 SPARLING, ROBERT & MARTHA 682.81 66.85 18.62 37.91 559.43 10/21/1999 201.00 - none 2.1160.1 STATES, DION 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 02/08/2000 82.64 - none 51.3280.1 STENSON, VIRGINIA 305.59 137.60 77.70 66.21 24.08 - none 22.1380.1 STORER, GEORGE & PATRICIA 370.57 - - - 370.57 - none 32.1710.1 STROEBEL, SEAN 337.50 - - 10.00 327.50 08/18/1999 171.09 - none 22.0860.2 TEATER, SUSAN 151.00 39.80 19.90 36.38 54.92 1111611999 3.42- 2.1190.1 TERRELL, A 116.28 91.31 24.97 - - 04/13/2000 50.00 - none 2.1930.1 TERRY, TIMOTHY 144.78 - - - 144.78 10/01/1999 82.59 - none 2.0952.1 THOMAS, TIMOTHY 104.30 76.39 27.91 - - 02101/2000 49.06 - none 34.1550.1 THOMPSON, HARRY 16.48 6.48 10.00 - - 02/22/2000 86.22 - none 35.5048.1 TIM AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - - 2.2200.3 TODD, RICK 88.72 64.64 24.08 - - 04/11/2000 24.08- 31.2254.1 TURNER, RAYMOND 248.28 - - - 248.28 - none 34.2104.1 TYLER, HEIDI 134.54 95.14 39.40 - -- 04/12/2000 33.42 - none 5.0456.1 UPTON, CHAD 554.14 - - 36.38 517.76 09/15/1999 262.50 - none 69.1192.1 USTICK, JOHN & KATHRYN 137.68 92.15 45.53 - - 03/29/2000 53.19 - none 19,0120.2 VANLEUVEN, MATTHEW 72.81 62.02 10.79 - - - 21 .0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 112.24 87.14 25.10 - - 05/0412000 50.00 - none 1.3340.1 WALSH, RON 165.69 - - - 165.69 10/15/1999 191.33 - ***none 21.2714.1 WATERMAN, LORI 143.85 103.55 40.30 - - 03/23/2000 40.00 - none 2.6080.1 WEBB, GERALD 93.00 66.62 26.38 - - 02/24/2000 26.38 -- none 21.1968.2 WELDIN, TAMRA 85.62 59.24 26.38 - - 02108/2000 89.54- 34.3266.1 WESTERN FINANCIAL SERVICE 106.76 84.86 21.90 - - 05/01/2000 85.31 - none 32.0846.1 WHITE, LUCILLE 84.87 60.79 24.08 - - 02/28/2000 27.91 - none 52.0262.1 WILD SHAMROCK LLP 944.35 635.95 308.40 - - 02/28/2000 670.70 - none 69.1304.1 WILDE, KENNETH 221.41 107.19 45.53 64.68 4.01 03/31/2000 68.10 - none 74.0356.1 WILSON, DEANA 110.46 97.83 12.63 -- - 04/12/2000 80.00 - none 3.0052.2 WINN, MARY 41.68 26.38 15.30 - - 31.3230.1 WITT, STEPHEN M. 73.09 60.79 12.30 - - 04/20/2000 24.08 - none 32.1560.1 WOOD, ADRON 33.76 - - 19.32 14.44 - none 31.3344.1 WOODRUFF, NOEL R 190.61 131.80 51.66 7.15 - 0411212000 50.00 - none 22.1622.1 WRIGHT, DARRIN 94.51 68.13 26.38 - - 04/14/2000 37.87 - none 19.6500.1 WRIGHT, SHEILA 162.75 121.05 41.70 - - 03/0812000 53.19 - none 74.3348.2 YEATTS, PAMELA 85.43 55.22 30.21 - - 02/08/2000 40.84- 2.0670.1 YOUNG, AUSTIN L 296.74 101.69 24.08 80.04 90.93 02/22/2000 100.00 - none 33.3570.1 ZOELLER, KATHRYN 122.90 55.87 24.08 24.08 18.87 05/1012000 55.08 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers May 16,2000 08:52am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Grand Totals: Name Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No = {<} 9900000 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Last Pmt Balance Non-Delinq 02/29/2000 0113112000 1213111999 Date Amount Msg 30,587.05 16,855.39 6,346.65 1,152.29 6,232.72 11H`� �> � � 0- . �'^ FR GIT' uF [�lER I D i 44 �'u�� ' ��1 TI�I �:.�-'4,.l1� F' . _l1 fJ='J�, t � � CITY OF MERIDIAN Shutoff Aunt List - MASTER LIST Standard Paymont Customem page: 1 Current Period: 05/31/2000 'may 17.2000 )!D-103M Sk-uutOff Mlnimum of $ 10.00 Compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criterta- TCrmfnated CuStOrners not i1lClud0d Customer.Cust No = €<} 0900 Customendis0onneted -z Na CuStomer.7il t off list= No Ctist No NarnC 1 Service Address Mairng Acldmss Talephone No Mato Past Due gai n Cp 1 0170.2 MVSCCUROY, NATHAN 721 3RD ST SIV 721 3RD ST W14.16 MERIDIAN ID 8362 0$.80 1.0590.1 LANTZ STAN 14038 W HALIFAX CT 2208-gM8-2387 608 3RD S7 W BOISE ID 83713 none 2 2. ; 4 76.76 2.OE70.1 YOUNG, AUSTIN L 7310 RIM ACRES 208-ti62-1837 918 10TH ST W BDISE ID 83709 none 195.05 +✓.74 2.0952_1 THOMAS, TIMOTHY 1464 W STATE ST 14G4 STATE ST W ., ME1�iDIAN !D 8364.. none 2x•91 1134.30 11601 STATES, DION 37 W CHERRY AVE 37 CHERRY AVE W MERIDIAN 1D 83642) none 24.08 T6, 72 2.1150.1 TERRELL. A 1324 W IST ST 1324 1 ST ST W MERIDIAN ID 8354%, rVinv 24.07 116.29 2.1890.2 JOHNSON. STEVEN? ORIJA ON ANDERSON 858-2407 S.I,i r 324 MAPLE AVE 1N 324 W MAPLE AVE � .23 124.56 MERIDIAN 1D 831342 22200.3 TOd f), RICK 315 CHERRY AVE W W24 315 CHERRY AVE MERIp[AN ]❑ 83£42 08 88•72 2.4200.1 BLAKELY, CL AUD E JAMES l G 18 W 8TH ST 1618 STH ST W MERIDIAN ID 83842 Wane 37.87 57.11 2.4360.1 SMITH, ANNIETTE ORIFRED SCHUELLEMAN 580-2357 1203 ELM COURT 1208 ELM COURT mane 80.07 13 1.35 MERIDIAN 1D 8384; 2.5597,2 BELL. DERRICK ORQANICE KLEMM.ANS 888-0280 1445 CARLTON Sr W 1+45 W CARt+TON 5T =7 fi1 83.00 MER1OIAN ID 83842 2.6030.1 KRASOWSKI, TOM PODOX 701 1017 12TH AVE V1t 208-858-3Mo MERIDIANI ID 83680 none 83.73 136.313 3.01012,1 JENNI, TERRY 772 N ABERNATHY WAY 208-895-E545 ► 72 ASEIRNIATHY WAY N MERIDIANI ID 83642 nonc 17.44 105.41 3 01161 PORTER, Tqp606 N MINERAL WELLS AVE 108-P'95-81S4 6D8 MINERAL WELLS AVE N MERIDIAN ID 83642 none 30.21 104.53 3,0326.1 BAIN, RAND 3345 S GLEN FALLS PL 208-,u3-178 3 2037 SLATON OR W BOISE ID 83706 none 97.02 213.90 3.0331.1 PORTER, DAVID 1979 W SLATOW D1, '1979 $-LATON DR W MERIDIAN IL3 83642 ryone 35.5`7 1 � _0 71 05-17-00 09:19 TO:MERIDIAN NATER DEPT FROM:208 887 481u P0I OS -17-&@ 09:19 TO : MERI D Y AN WATER DEPT FROM : 208 887 481-'-3p P02 00 0`.2''7 FR C 17-.`r' OF ]%]ER I E, I AH �10',3 18"E37, 441.--`3 TCI F ►'��' � �r t k. , CITE' OF MERIDLAN Shutaff Amount i.ist - MASTER LIST Page: 2 Standard Peymenl Customer3 Wy 17,2000 09:11 em Current Period: 05/3112000 Shutoff Mlnlmum of 3'10.00 compared to 001ir)quent Balance CUSt No Marne 1 Se cc Address �- M3iiino Address i clophons No Nate Past Due 8a'. r3nc : 4.05G4.1 DARREl L WILSON CONSTRUCTION 10805 VV DASON 24.05 78.72 3062 FORECAST ST VV BOISE ID 8370 4.1240.1 PEARSON, RONALD 2SI2 W CARLTON ST 208-.895-0035 none 47.87 143.90 2512 CARLTON ST W MERIDIAN ID 53642 4.1294.11 BASER. GLENN 2537 W CARLTON ST none 06.92 154.77 2537 CARLTON ST W MERIDIAN ID 63642 19.0124.2 VANLE VEN, MATTHEW 3624 MUIRFIEI.D DR W 3824 MUIRFIEL.D DR Vel MERIDIAN ID 83642 10.79 72.61 19.40076.1 BURGUNDY HOMES 2647 ELLIS AVE 24.08 78.72 3865 MOON LAKE ST VAI BOISE ID 88702 1I�•fiSOD,1 WRIGHT, SHEILA ORUOFFERY & CALLY STONE 206.265-4(378 none 41.70 3159 VALAM AVE N 3169 N VALAM AVE 1302.75 MERIDIAN 1D 83B4L 19.7156.1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 2562 N TANGENT AVE .2662 TANGENT AVE N MERIDIAN ID 93642 24.08 87.47 20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA PO BOIL 1088 ooric 10.85 65.40 1870 INCLINE WY MERIDIAN ID 83680 "0.1684.1 MEDLEY, STEVEN 3761 WOODMON T OR 208-88 5615 none 44.69 136.78 8761 WOODMONT DRQ MERIDIAN! ID 83642 21.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST O DOUG, & ANGELA ABDERHALDEN 398-7G90 rloryf: 25.10 1632 TODD WAY 1632 TODD WY 112.24 MERIDIAN JD 835.42 21.0184.1 ALLEN, ROBERT 1096 B.ARRINGTON C)R 20MM-8980 gone 34.04 ".30.66 2559 CREEKSTONE CT W FAYETTEVILL AR 72701 21.1930.2 BAILEY. BRUCE OR IRI(7,K INGRAH,A.M 377-Di36 132,42 742.95 2594 REBECCA WAY 2594 REBECCA WAY MERIDIAN Id 83642 21.1988.2 WELDIN, TAMPA P.Q. BOK 65 501-533--315526 35 65 622511 REBECCA WAY SPRAGUE RIVER OR 97639 21.2714.1 WATERVIAN. LORI 2511 N STONE PLACE 208-884-3175 none 40.30 143.85 2511 STONE PL N MERIDIANI ID 83642 21.2)728.1 KESLING, SCOTT & MONICA 244; N STONE PL 607-3418 none 37,67 i 33.G2 2448 STONE PL N MERIDIAN ID 83(342 21.2736.1 BAILEY, MICHELLE. 2506 N STONE PL none- 55.11 212.19 2S4G STONE RL N MERIDIAN 10 636.12 21 2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 2777 STALLION ST W 22.51 27-77 STALLION ST VIS MERIDIAN ID 83642 123.02- OS -17-&@ 09:19 TO : MERI D Y AN WATER DEPT FROM : 208 887 481-'-3p P02 &5-17-&@ 09:19 TO : MERIDIAN WATER DEPT FRC)M : 208 887 48133 P03 i'IH`i 1'7 C-0 C19 FR C I T` OF I'iER I D IAN i-- Car ; 4-1-3 , l Ti 1 f G 1 17lr i CITY OF MERIDIAN Shutoff A=unt List - MASTER LIST kne: � Standard Payment Customers May 17.20100 09.12om Curran( Padod: 05131/2000 Shutoff Minimum of S 10.00 compgred to Delinquent Balance CuSt NO Name J Service Address Mailing Address Telephone No Noce Past Due Balance 21.3290.2 B OBKO, RAYMOND DRIPAM WOOD 378-1110 56.49 243.35 3133 HEARTH AVE N 3133 N HEARTH AVE MERIDJAN ID 83542 22.0332.1 LEE, MICHELLE 1931 TRACY CT none 39.40 124.68 1q,31 TRACY CT MERIDIAN ID X42 2.2.15.24.2 KOCH, CARL ORILEANNA DANIELS 27.91 112.37 1994 SANDALWOOD DR 1994 SANDALWOOD DR MERIDIAN ID 83642 22.15Z4,1 PITT], .JOHN ,JOSEPH 1950 TANA COURT 203-895-8351 none 82.83 207.79 1950 TANA COURT MERIDIAN ID 8384? 31.0134.1 SN1171-H, 15RADI-EY MICHELLE SMITH none 39.40 152'.-4� 1345 YOST CT W 1,345 W YOST CT MERIDIAN 1D 83G42 31-0512-1 BOKA4AN, H LEN 11654 HIGHLANDER RD 208-45874923$ none S7.57 195,91 1S10 STOREY ST BOISE ID (33704 31.0558.1 MILLER. NEIL ORIWM SKIPPER 203-222-3087 none 39,40 1:7.28 1433 KiNOSWOOD AVE 1433 KINGSWOOD AVE MERIDIAN ID x3842 31 2192.1 MCM1LLAr . VICKI ORIROY LUTNER none 54.66 194.48 2771 12TH ST 2T77 12TH ST MERIDIAN ID 8342 a�C1A, ANOTON10 MARINA LANDA & ELDER AYALA none 87.00 ?Is7.53 1382 DARRAH DR 1382 OARRAH DR MERIDIAN 1D 83842 31.30:36.1 HASSIS, BENJAMIN & PAM 1303 W CHATEAU AVE 208-888-01 r09 none 35.57 1?9.4F 1303 CHATEAU AVk.W MERIDIAN 11D 83542 31 3,-IA4.1 WOODRUEF, NOEL R (DRfLISA & ROBERT DELONG 208-887-9157 none 58.81 100.61 902 DELMAR DR 9fl2 OELMAR DR MERIDIAN ID 83542 31 3354.1 L.EONARC)SON, E1.I7.ASETH 7052 HILLTOP WAY n0r�e 27.91 00.07 2232 10TH ST NW BOISE ID 83749 -Si-3496.2 LETTICH, KENNETH 1905 11TH AVE NW 11.63 6 0. 27 1905 11TH AVE NW MERIDIAN ID 838A2 320458.2 ROAM, JACQUELINE 2130 8TH ST NW 10.92 91.95 2130 8TH ST NW MERIDIAN ID 63642 3.2.1320.1 LUKE DAVID C ORfKEVIN NEWSERRY 208-888-6572 none 32.94 88.39 113 WOODBURY DR W 113 X11 WOODBURY MERIDIAN ID $3642 33.2276.1 LEVVIS. RIK & CAROL ORINELSON & QEV COOK 208-888-2384 none 45.31 140.45 2&33 ARROW WOOD WAY N 2533 N ARROW WOOD WAY MERl41AN Ip 835.2 &5-17-&@ 09:19 TO : MERIDIAN WATER DEPT FRC)M : 208 887 48133 P03 I II=1`r' r? C-1 = '23 FR L T`r OF IIER I D I k'] '4''6J 'S'1-73'l 4813 TID �kc,�r,-159- P _ 1214; %i� CITY OF MERIDIAN Shutoff Aoraunl List - MASTER LIST Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers May 17,'2Wp 09:1 earn Cement Period: 0513112000 Shutoff MnImum of S 10.00 aampared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 15envios Address Mailing Telephone No Mate Past Due Balanre 33.2402.1 MCPHERSON, JO ANN CRIISASEL AGUILERA none 54.47 152.01 600 COUGAR DR E Goo E COUGAR DR MERIDIAN ID 63642 33-2620.1 CECIL, ODETTE 722 E BALDWIN ST 208-288-0585 none 13.05 140.76 722 BALDWIN ST E MERIDIAN ID 8364') 34.0724.2 S ILCOX, BENJAMIN 2254 ZIRCON AVE N 8$7-9545 27.91 51,115 2254 ZIRCON AVE N ME-P1DIAN ID 83842 ?4.0934.1 MASON, DREW 3 VICKIE 2592 N SHOVELER WAY none 34.x11; 1111.14 2592 SHOVELER WAY h1 MERIDIAN ID 83642 34.1550-1 THOMPSON, HARRY 1 175 AMITY RD W 2M-888.5298 nont 10.00 16.46 2755 MULE DEER WAY N MERIDIAN ID 83542 35.2704.1 TYLER, HE1D1 1034 TAMMY PLACE none :::x.40 134-5 4 1034 TAMMY ST MERIDIAN 1D N3542 34.3212.1 KERB$, DAVID 1333 E STCRMY DR nor)e 124.06. 78.72 1339 STORMY DR E MERIDI'AN 10 83642 34.3?8t►.1 WESTERN FINANCIAL $ERVICES INC ORICURRENT RESIDENT none 21.90 106.76 3045 BIG ROCK PL N 3048 N BIG ROCK PL MERIDIAN ID 83642 35.5043.1 T1M AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 2548 W WILLARQ ST 24.98 7°.72 2D43 bW0R$HA1 % DR E MERIDIAN 1D 6;1642 42.2388.2 DALY, BERT CO/ HUDDLESTON, TIM 176.3E 249.57 2255 GREENMEADOW CT E 2255 E GREENMEADOW CT MERIDIAN ID 83642 423106.1 DUNSTAN, JOAN 1922 E CHIMERE DR 208.395-8432 none 24.08 87.47 1922 CHIMERE DR E MERIDIAN ID 83642 46-D448.1 BEERY, LON 35563 E CONGRES$IQNAL DR none 33,2; 118.25 355G CONGRESSIONAL, OR E MERIDIAN ID 8SC412 50.0154.1 ROS! SMITH CON$TRUGTION 3994 ARMSTRONG AVE 24.08 1137 CATHY AVE N BOI$E ID 83704 78.72 50.0208.1 CLARK, TERRY 4oa E STATE AVE 404 STATE AVE E MERIDIAN ID 83842 none 24.48 130.38 50.1706.2 HUNT, STEVE 16 E. WASHINGTON 27. 4 4 52.08 18 WA$nINGTON AVE E MERIDIAN 10 53842 51.0266.1 CROW, DAN 704 E 5TH ST none 27.91 100.10 7D4 57H ST E MERIDIAN ID 83642 195-17-00 09:20 TO : MERIDIAN WATER REPT FROM : 208 887 4813 PO4 GS -17-&O 99:20 TO :MERIDIAN WATER DEPT FROM : 2&8 887 481%'30 p05 i•iH`�' 1r -i` , 00 09:4-2-8 FF' C I TY OF 1-1ER I D I HNA '034013 �,,-�, 4013 T r. CITY OF MERIDIAN Shutoff Account List - I`446STER LIST P 3rd: 5 Standard Pa)�rient Customers May 17,2300 0C4:1 •►sm Current Period: 05!3112000 Shutoff Minimum of $ 10.00 aampared to 06inquent Balance Ctist No Name 1 Service Address Mailino Address Telephone No Note P-,)st Due Ralan�e ,91.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI OR1YV ONNE JACOBS 587-0631 31.49 2015.83 42{1IDAHO AVE E 42-8 E IDAHO AVE MERIDIAN ID 83642 51.x998.1 CULVER. WALTER CIOLAY HAYES 206-853-122-2 nano 35.57 104.3Q 911 PfNE AVE E 911 E PfNE AVE MERIDIAN FD 83642 51.3082.1 JOHNSON PROPERTY MGMNT ORQASON CHRISTENSEN 208-884--3310 none 24.09 88.34 15 KING ST E 16 E KING Sr MERIDIAN ID 83680 51.3310.1 ROGERS, MILDRED 226 E 2 -ND ST 208-88&974.0 none 22.88 75.12 225 2ND ST E I'JIERIDIAN ID 53542 64.4062-1 REMARKABLE HOMES INC 10348 FEEDER 214.08 78.72 LAKE GREEK DR E $OISE 1D X1.3709 69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 1444 E QOBERMAN ST 208-895-0935 none 28.58 86.04 1444 DOBERMAN ST E MERIDIAN 1D 83642 60.0484.2 BARBER, CURTIS ORITOM TEDOVIK 8-819-1844 14.56 111.01 1272 SHEPHERD ST E 1272 SHEPHEPp ST E MERIDIAN ID 83642 69.00811 MERIDIAN GREENS HOMEOWNERS P.O. BOX 851 59.70 62.94 E ,JAMAICA 1N ISLAND MERIDIAN ID 83660 89.1 }92,1 USTIGK, JOHN & KATHRYN ORIGREG ALLEN N2-628994 (10I)e 45.53 137.68 2115 3RD WY SE 2115 SE 3RD WAS' MERIDIAN 1D 83842 60.1249.1 MER ORNS;j3 HOMEOWNER$ ASSOC PO BOX 551 none E,66 4 4. 76 AMALIE GT IN ISLAND MERIDIAN 1D 83590 69.1059.1 MERIDIAN GRNS HOMEOWNERS AS" -3C PO BOX 851 none 65.77 77.11 E SJDE STH ST $I* (iN FIELD) MERIDIAN ID 836B0 69.1 T03.1 GLENCO INC. PO BOX 1551 none70.07 110 57 3RD WAY SE (E SIDE ENTRANCE) MERIDIAN 1D 83680 74.0356.1 WILSON, DEANA 692 HANOVER COURT none 12.63 110.46 692 HANOVER CT MERIDIAN Ifs 83642 74.0x70.3 KNOLL, HARVEY 654 BARRETT ST 49-71 10486 654 BARRETT ST MERIDIAN 1D 83642 74.2832.1 MOONEY, KEVIN 1319 CRESTWOOD OR 208-888-3106 none 41.48 126.11 1319 CRESTWOOD DR W MERIDIANI ID 83642 GS -17-&O 99:20 TO :MERIDIAN WATER DEPT FROM : 2&8 887 481%'30 p05 Gn3nd Totzls: 87 Cu�tomem Listed Report C.Ilerla: Terminated customers not included CU -5001 w-CW,Rt No = M 99ODMO Customar.disconnected = No Custor71C1'.0ut Oft list = No n c� -- 1 -7—nn n n - --i r) -r- `% . a, -( T,- T1 ► r. T n r r I ; " n -r r r+ r-. r- r-\ -r 3,832.9E 12,311.57 =`h` T_ITHL F'HGE. l lH`,, 1" , FF' �='L' ,_� 1 �' =1 J ,_„�, _ �, IST`;' OF t��E I I H�� =fit, ' c" "' 481-3 TO J LJ k F` . � t IS'i_1r, CITE' OF MERIDIAN ShUtolf A=unt List - MASTER LIST pogc'- E Standard Payment Customers Mss -17.2000 09:1[am Current Period: 0513112900 Shutoff Mnimum of S 10.00 compared to Delinquent &alsnce Cust No NWmc-� 1 Scxvic a Address Mailing Address Telephone No Nate Psst Due Balance 74.3072. 1 LYTLE. CHAD & STACEY 992 W LOOM ST 246-x $4- 3 8 none 30.21 928! 992 LOON S7 W MERIDIAN ID 83642 74,3246.1 MEYER, JOHN & USA 451 S PELICAN WAY none 57.70 187.32 461 PELICAN WY S MER.IDIAN 1D 83642 74,334$,? YEAT'T$. PAMELA OR�SHANNA GROOMS 321-7727 30-21 85.43 1359 GANDER DR W 1.399 YY GANDER DR MERIDIAN ID $36:2 74.3370,1 ECHIPARE, DOMINADCR CRIMATTHEW LINDENNILITH clone 43.40 121.60 627 PELICAN YUY S 827 S PELICAN WAY MERIDIAN ID 83f) 1A Gn3nd Totzls: 87 Cu�tomem Listed Report C.Ilerla: Terminated customers not included CU -5001 w-CW,Rt No = M 99ODMO Customar.disconnected = No Custor71C1'.0ut Oft list = No n c� -- 1 -7—nn n n - --i r) -r- `% . a, -( T,- T1 ► r. T n r r I ; " n -r r r+ r-. r- r-\ -r 3,832.9E 12,311.57 =`h` T_ITHL F'HGE. BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of MERIDIAN 05-16-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) Case No. PP -00-004 REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY ) PLAT FOR HERON BROOD ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL BY PINNACLE ENGINEERS, ) APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY INC. ) PLAT The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on May 2, 2000, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and the Applicant, Bob Unger of Pinnacle Engineers, Inc., appeared and testified, and the City Council having received a report from Bruce Freckleton, Assistant City Engineer, and Brad Hawkins -Clark, Assistant Planner, and the City Council having received as part of the record of this matter the recommendation to City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the applicant having submitted the latest Preliminary Plat at the May 2, 2000, City Council meeting, and the "Preliminary Plat Drawing DATE: 12/14/99, REVISED: 03/14/00 City of Meridian, 03/22/00 City of Meridian, 04/27/00 Client, Drawn By: DING, CHECKED BY: J. CARPENDER, P.E., PROJECT NO. C996218, SHEET 1 CJ -1, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., Developer, for HERON BROOD FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 1 TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION, )7 submitted for preliminary plat approval and which preliminary plat for approval application is herein received and adjudged by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-3. Therefore the City Council makes the following findings: FINDINGS of FACT 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan by reason of the fact that it lies within the existing Urban Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map, Infrastructure Planning Analysis Comprehensive Plan and Map, adopted December 217 1993, and the property is presently zoned High Density Residential (R-40), and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System. [Meridian City Code § 11-7-2 C.] 2. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ordinance No. 629. 3. It is determined that Urban Services can be made available to accommodate the proposed development if the plat complies with the requirements and conditions hereinafter set forth as conditions of preliminary plat approval. 4. The proposed development is a continuity of the proposed development within the City's Capital Improvement Program and if the conditions which are FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 2 requested by the Planning and Zoning Administrator and the Assistant City Engineer and as proposed by the developer as stated on the preliminary plat there will be public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development if built in accordance with the conditions and as proposed, will not create health, safety or environmental problems and there have been no specifics of any such concerns brought to the Council's attention. 6. It is found that the Recommendation To City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission is reasonable and appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat as hereinafter set forth. 7. The applicant has submitted for consideration of this approval drawing of the preliminary plat herein designated as: "Preliminary Plat Drawing DATE - 12/14/99, REVISED: 03/14/00 City of Meridian, 03/22/00 City of Meridian, 04/27/00 Client, Drawn By: DING, CHECKED BY: J. CARPENDER, P.E., PROJECT NO. C996218, SHEET 1 CU -1, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., Developer, for HERON BROOK TOWNHOMBS SUBDIVISION. 77 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 3 DECISION AND ORDER Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER 1. The Preliminary Plat of the applicant as evidenced by "Preliminary Plat Drawing DATE: 12/14/99, REVISED: 03/14/00 City of Meridian, 03/22/00 City of Meridian, 04/27/00 client, Drawn By: DI<G, CHECKED BY: J. CARPENDER, P.E., PROJECT NO. C996218, SHEET 1 CU -1, PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., Developer, for HERON BROOK TowNHoMES SUBDIVISION", is hereby conditionally approved; and 2. The conditions of approval are as follows to -wit: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as follows: 2.1 Obtain a letter from the Ada County Street Name Committee, approving the subdivision and street names. Applicant shall make any, corrections necessary to conform. 2.2 Coordinate fire hydrant placement with the City of Meridian Public Works Department. 2.3 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 4 Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments, and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 2.4 Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via extensions from the existing main that was stubbed out to Blue Heron Lane at the time sanitary sewer was installed in Meridian Road. Applicant shall be `responsible to construct the sewer mains to and through this proposed development, i.e. along the entire frontage of Blue Heron Lane. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes are to be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of the centerline. 2.5 Water service to this site shall be via extensions from the e}cisting 10 inch diameter main that was stubbed out to Blue Heron Lane at the time water mains were installed in Meridian Road. Applicant shall be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development, i.e. along the entire frontage of Blue Heron Lane. Subdivision designer to coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Provide the Public works department with information on anticipated fire flow and domestic water requirements for the proposed site. 2.6 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 2.7 Underground pressurized irrigation shall be provided to all landscape areas on site. Due to the landscape area, primary water supply connection to the City's mains will not be allowed. Applicant shall be required to utilize any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If City water is proposed as a secondary source, developer shall be responsible to pay water assessments for the entire common open area. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 5 2.8 A final detailed landscape plan for the common areas, including fencing locations, pathways and types of construction, shall be submitted for review and approval with the submittal of the final plat. The plan must include sizes and species of trees, shrubs, and all proposed ground cover/treatment. A letter of credit or cash surety will be required for the improvements prior to signature on the final plat. The concept landscaping shown on the preliminary plat is acknowledged and approved with the additions and changes noted under Site Specific Comments. 2.9 Applicant shall be required to dedicate all right-of-way along Meridian Road and Blue Heron as required by ACHD prior to the issuance of any building permits. 2.10 The soils investigation report submitted with the application indicates that groundwater was encountered at some fairly shallow depths within the project site. From the information contained in the report, the opinion of the reports author would project depths to seasonal high groundwater across the site from ±5.5 feet to ± 1.0 feet below existing ground surface. With this shallow depth, it is highly unlikely that a sub- surface drainage system would be a feasible design alternative. The City of Meridian requires a minimum 3 -feet of clearance from the bottom of a seepage bed to the normal high ground water elevation. 2.11 Design engineer to provide a statement of compliance, prior to the approval of development plans, that certifies that the centerline finish grade of the streets, public or private, is at least 3 -feet above the established normal ground water elevation. This is an effort to ensure that the building footings are at least 1 -foot above the high ground water. 2.12 The driveways have been redesigned to a 30' back -of -curb to back -of - curb. The Applicant has reviewed the west end of the driveway with Denny Bowers, Fire Chief, and as long as it is not more than 150' from the intersection of the north south driveway there shall be no requirement to provide a turnaround for emergency vehicles. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 6 Adopt the Recommendations of the. Fire Department as follows: 2.13 Applicants shall satisfy all fire code requirements including those pertaining to water flow and fire hydrants. 2.14 The Applicant shall provide an emergency turnaround at the entrance and driveway of the clubhouse lot. Additionally, the installation of a fire hydrant will be placed in the clubhouse lot area. Adopt the Recommendations of the Central District Health Department as follows: 2.15 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 2.16 Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. 2.17 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. 2.18 The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Adopt the Recommendations of Sanitary Services as follows: 2.19 Sanitary services has no objection to this preliminary plat. The Applicant shall provide for dumpsters in two locations and shall coordinate the locations with the Public Works Department. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 2.20 Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Meridian Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 7 2.21 Dedicate 15 -feet of right-of-way from the northern edge of right-of-way of Blue Heron Lane abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. The owner will not be compensated for this additional right-of-way because Blue Heron Lane is a local street and is to be brought to adopted standards by the developers of abutting properties. 2.22 Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. 2.23 Improve Blue Heron Lane abutting the site as one half of a 36 -foot street sections plus 12 -feet of additional pavement with curb, gutter, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within SO -feet of right-of-way. 2.24 Provide a paved temporary turnaround at the end of Blue Heron Lane with a temporary easement provided to the District. Coordinate the easement and design of the temporary turnaround with District staff. 2.25 Locate two 30 -foot wide curb return driveways with 15 -foot curb radii off Blue Heron Lane approximately 120 -feet and 500 -feet east of Meridian Road. Pave the driveways a minimum of 30 -feet wide and at least 30 -feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of Blue Heron Lane. 2.26 Provide the District with a copy of a recorded access easement among the parcels for use of the driveways for access to the public street prior to final plat approval. 2.27 Replace the unused curb cut on Meridian Road. located approximately 130 -feet north of Blue Heron Lane, with standard curb, gutter and 5 - foot wide concrete sidewalk to match existing improvements. 2.28 As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 2.29 No access points to Meridian Road have been proposed and none are FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) - 8 approved with this application. 2.30 The Nampa &, Meridian Irrigation District's Jackson Drain courses along the north boundary of this property, and the recorded easement of the Jackson Drain is 60 feet, 30 feet from the center each way. The District reserves the right to claim what they deem necessary to operate and maintain the facility. B action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of 2000. By: 1:013ART D. CORRIE Mayor, City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Nftwpov City Clerk Dated: msg/Z:\Work\NWeridian 15360MUHeron Brook CUP and PP\FfC1sOrd.PP FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT PINNACLE ENGINEERS, INC., HERON BROOD TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION (PP -00-004) EM j ol lk .. C C) D Z �m -� m m C)0 —� m 61�. .. C C) 0 Mm=07704 9 m m �4z"now 0 SII C" ria 0 7 RECEIVEj) MAY 15.2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of MERIDu-&X o5 -1S -o0 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) Case No. PP -99-016 REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY ) PLAT FOR WOODHAVEN ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND SUBDIVISION BY DAN WOOD, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND D.W., INC. ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on March 7, 2000, and continued to March 21, 2000, and Steve Siddoway, Assistant Planner for the Planning and Zoning Department, appeared and testified, and the Applicant, Dan Wood, appeared and testified, and appearing for the Applicant was Steve Bradbury, and appearing with comments and/or concerns were: Rex Young, Dave Marquart, Jim Allen, Mary Allen, and the matter was tabled to April 4, 2000, and again until April 18, 2000, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant was Gary Lee of JUB Engineers, and the City Council having received a report from Bruce Freckleton, Assistant City Engineer, and Brad Hawkins -Clark, Assistant Planner, and the City Council having received as part of the record of this matter the recommendation to City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the applicant having submitted the latest Preliminary Plat at the April 4, 2000, FINDINGS of FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 1 City Council meeting, and the Preliminary Plat Drawing Dated by handwritten date: 5-8-00, and received by the City of Meridian stamped May 08 2000, Drawn By: LDW, DESIGN BY: BAP, CHECItED BY: GAL, PROJECT NO. 11606, SHEET 1 OF 31 by J -U -B Engineers, Inc., DAN WOOD, D.W., INC., Developer/Owner, for WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION, submitted for preliminary plat approval and which preliminary plat for approval application is herein received and adjudged by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 12-3-3. Therefore the City Council makes the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan by reason of the fact that it lies within the existing Urban Area as defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map, Infrastructure Planning Analysis Comprehensive Plan and Map, adopted December 217 1993 and ,the property is presently zoned ,and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer System. [Meridian City Code § 11-7-2 C.] 2. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, ordinance No. 629. 3. It is determined that Urban Services can be made available to accommodate the proposed development if the plat complies with the requirements FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 2 and conditions hereinafter set forth as conditions of preliminary plat approval. 4. The proposed development is a continuity of the proposed development within the City's Capital Improvement Program and if the conditions which are requested by the Planning and Zoning Administrator and the Assistant City Engineer and as proposed by the developer as stated on the preliminary plat there will be public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development if built in accordance with the conditions and as proposed, will not create health, safety or environmental problems and there have been no specifics of any such concerns brought to the Council's attention. 6. It is found that the Recommendation To City Council of the Planning and Zoning Commission is reasonable and appropriate for the conditions of approval of the preliminary plat as hereinafter set forth. 7. The applicant has submitted for consideration of this approval drawing of the preliminary plat herein designated as: "Preliminary Plat Drawing Dated by hand written date: 5-8-00, and received by the City of Meridian stamped May 08 2000, Drawn By: LDW , DESIGN BY: BAP, CHECKED BY: GAL, PROJECT NO. 11606, SHEET 1 OF 3, by J -U -B Engineers, Inc., DAN WOOD, DW, INC., Developer/Owner, for WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION". DECISION AND ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER of CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 3 Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 12-3-5 and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND THIS DOES ORDER 1. The Preliminary Plat of the applicant as evidenced by "Preliminary Plat Drawing Dated by hand written date: 5-8-00, and received by the City of Meridian stamped May 08 2000, Drawn By: LDW, DESIGN BY: BAP, CHECKED BY: GAL, PROJECT NO. 11606, SHEET 1 OF 3, by J -U -B Engineers, Inc., DAN WOOD, DW, INC., Developer/Owner, for WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION", is hereby conditionally approved; and 2. The conditions of approval are as follows to -wit: Adopt the Planning and Zoning Administrator and Assistant City Engineer Recommendations as follows: 2.1 Sanitary sewer service to this site shall be via an extension from the existing main line installed in Thousand Springs Village Subdivision. Subdivision designer shall coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. Sewer manholes shall be provided to keep the sewer lines on the south and west sides of centerline. 2.2 Water service to this site shall be via extensions of the existing main in line installed in Thousand Springs Village Subdivision. Applicant shall be responsible to construct the water mains to and through this proposed development. Subdivision designer shall coordinate main sizing and routing with the Public Works Department. 2.3 Developer shall indicate any existing ditch easements on the preliminary FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 4 plat map. 2.4 A fencing plan, and detailed landscape plan for all landscaped areas, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to submittal of the final plat map. A letter of credit or cash surety shall be required for the improvements prior to signature on the final plat. Perimeter fencing shall be installed prior to obtaining building permits. 2.5 A letter of credit or cash shall be required for all landscaping, sanitary sewer, water, etc., prior to signature on the final plat. 2.6 Applicant's engineer shall be required to submit a signed, stamped statement certifying that all street finish centerline elevations are set a minimum of three feet above the highest established normal groundwater elevation. 2.7 Two -hundred -fifty and 100 -watt, high-pressure sodium streetlights shall be required at locations designated by the Public Works Department. All streetlights shall be installed at subdivider's expense. Typical locations are at street intersections and/or fire hydrants. 2.8 The reference to "A Planned Unit Development is Requested" in the "Project Summary" box at the bottom of the plat shall be deleted. 2.9 All proposed roads shall have a 50 -foot right-of-way with a 36 -foot street section. Developer shall continue the detached parkway sidewalks south into Woodhaven on both sides of S. Moon Dipper Avenue to the intersection of E. Goldbug Street, as designed in Thousand Springs Village to the north. 2.10 City Ordinance No. 11-10-4 allows house sizes in the R-8 zone to vary throughout the subdivision, as long as they are dispersed. The Applicant proposes the following disbursement of house sizes, which comply with the ordinance: FINDINGS of FACT AND CONCLUSIONS of LAW AND ORDER of CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 5 House Size # of Houses on Plat % Provided Allowed % by Code 1 7000 - 1,100 s.f. 2 6% 10% 17100 - 11200 3 10% 15% 12200 - 12300 7 23% 25% 12301 + 17 56% 50% 2.11 A note shall be added to the plat stating the minimum house size is exclusive of garages. Adopt the Recommendations of Central District Health Department as follows: 2.12 The Applicant's central sewage and central water plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health &. Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality. 2.13 Run-off shall not create a mosquito breeding problem. 2.14 Stormwater shall be pretreated through a grassy swale prior to discharge to the subsurface to prevent impact to groundwater and surface water quality. 2.15 The Engineers and architects involved with the design of the subject project shall obtain current best management practices for stormwater disposal and design a stormwater management system that prevents groundwater and surface water degradation. Adopt the Recommendations of the Meridian Fire Department as follows: 2.16 All street name signs and roads shall be constructed before building begins. 2.17 There shall be no parking of vehicles or trailers in the cul-de-sacs. 2.18 There shall be no parking in the common lot in front of Block 2, Lots FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 6 287 29, 30 and 31. Adopt the additional conditions set forth at the City Council meeting of April 18, 2000 as follows: 2.19 The fencing along the McDonald Lateral shall be similar to Thousand Springs Village Subdivision at the height of the lateral to the West. The fence line shall be built up as necessary to the same level as the roadway which parallels McDonald Lateral. The Developer shall design and install the fence as required. 2.20 The Developer shall work with the Boise Project Board of Controls so piping of McDonald Lateral and the installation of the separate delivery system for the property owners can be done simultaneously. 2.21 The Developer shall survey and stake the property line after McDonald Lateral is piped so that the City boundaries are clearly established and marked. 2.22 The following statement shall be included upon the Plat, and contained in all deeds transferring any lots within the subdivision: "Limits on Lawsuits against Agricultural Operations: Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 22-4501 through 22-4504, no agricultural operation or appurtenance to it shall be or become a nuisance, public or private, as a result of changes in surrounding uses when such operation or appurtenance was not a nuisance when the operation began, unless the operation is improper or negligent as set out in Idaho Code § 22- 4502(2)." Adopt the ACHD Recommendations as follows: 2.23 Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eagle Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the right-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner shall be compensated for all right-of-way dedicated FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-0I6) - 7 as an addition to existing right-of-way from available impact fee revenues in this benefit zone, if the owner submits a letter of application to the impact fee administrator prior to breaking ground, in accordance with Section 15 of ACRD Ordinance # 193. 2.24 Construct a 5 -foot wide detached sidewalk on Eagle Road abutting the entire site. The sidewalk should be located two feet within the new right-of-way of Eagle Road. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff shall be required. 225 Locate the Moon Dipper Street/Eagle Road intersection approximately 100 -feet south of the north property line, as proposed. 2.26 Construct all public roads within the subdivision as a 36 -foot street sections with curbs, gutters, and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalks within 50 -feet of right-of-way. Coordinate the transition of the setback sidewalks to the north of the site with District staff. 2.27 Terminate the Moon Dipper Court and Hood Ranch Place with standard 45 -foot radii cul-de-sacs. Coordinate the design of the cul-de- sacs with District staff. 2.28 Other than the access point specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Eagle Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the -�'- day of 2000. By ROB RT D. CORRIE Mayor, City of Meridian FINDINGS of FACT AND CONCLUSIONS of LAW AND ORDER of CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WOODHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 8 Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. _Ia",,,,m+,1,,.. By: rty Clerk Dated: msg/Z:\Work\"eridian 15360M\Woodhaven\FfC1s0rd.PP Of �tx � f M SEAL "4 #f t4wI not e FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT - DAN WOOD, D.W.,INC., WDDDHAVEN SUBDIVISION (PP -99-016) - 9 � RECQRDH-RERUr*ST OF �._. COUNTY RECORDER ,1. 000 NAVARRO FEE EPU 199$ MY 14AM$ CITY 4066i�& �•3� 7 99048756 g�3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT THE OWNER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HAS MADE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REZONE OF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR REAL PROPERTY THAT LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN FROM R-15 (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT AND R-4 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING,DISTRICT TO L -O (LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT) AS DEFINED UNDER §11-2-408B(7) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID REZONING DESIGNATION TO THE OFFICLA.L MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,. COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION I. FINDINGS: 1. The owner of the following described property has made a written request for a re -zone of the zoning classification for the subject Real Property herein described from R-15 (Medium High Density Residential) District and R-4 (Low Density Residential) District to L -O (Limited Office) District as defined under §11-2-408B(7) of the Municipal Code of the City of Meridian; and RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 1 0.75 .ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY OF MERIDIAN 2. The City of Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council having given notice and conducted all public hearings in accordance with law and having issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law and Decision and Order granting the application for rezone; and 3. The real property which is the subject of this ordinance is legally described as: A parcel located in the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, and containing Lot 8 of Block 10 of The Lalce at Cherry Lane No. 5 Subdivision on file in the office of the Recorder, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a brass cap monument marking the southeasterly corner of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (one-quarter corner) from which a 5/8 inch diameter iron pin marking the northeasterly corner of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 bears N 0°24'34" E a distance of 1325.91 feet; Thence N 0°24'34" E along the easterly boundary of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 a distance of 170.00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said easterly boundary N 88°55'29" W a distance of 193.00 feet to a 1/2 inch diameter iron pin marking the northwesterly corner of said Lot 8; RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 2 0.75 ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY OF MERIDIAN Thence S 0°24'34" W along the westerly boundary of said Lot 8 a distance of 170.00 feet to a 1/2 inch diameter iron pin marking the southwesterly corner of said Lot 8, said point also being on the southerly boundary of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4; Thence S 88'55'29" E along said southerly boundary a distance of 193.00 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING. This parcel contains 0.75 acres and is subject to any easements existing or in use. SECTION 2. That the above-described real Property be, and the same is hereby re -zoned and designed (L-0) Limited Office District. SECTION 3. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps depicting the City of Meridian land use zones in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 3 0.75 ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY of MERIDIAN PASSED BY TETE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this '/-day of %Q 71999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY DE MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ¢ day of /"�l ""1 , 1999. ATT T`: 4 City Clerk, SPLAL 1 � kF ms Z:1Work1MlMeridian 15360M1Fire DeptlFireSuta�.S clO"q ".r.s � �� h��1ill t1111 RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 4 0.7.5 ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY OF MERIDIAN Z' �� tr .,.L tL il� 0 WSWEETi 00 1 = I I t Ijl � I ' �' i I i, 1 I+ �•r 7 w Lateral _j lt I L� ' { I z r[ fir► r ` _'_ I " ~ ,LLA WM L f4=Azri .. U Tiz ET-- _ _ �? 0—� - /0 1 1 � \ _ - � N WE LAKE ZI U l L, W D 1 ST t, R W FIE r Ion HERBY , I - -- CHERRY LANE r � � a; �-- �z; `.�; , �� f�F Ir �: 1� WI I {r + I 1 � _._ z _._..� I Iia ((1 f *:ate T07h 1! i' I ;r i 1121, ��.—.. 10 r -- - -�; -. CHERRY __ »_�_ ._�______ _ - It W TETE ST w 44.1 E �1 I y p 1 1: �1 ir WJJA_ R@Q9 PQ[ry�w ,: 1 i i r r i i I tlee .� •� ',Lt t -- _ ..] �..—`— ��. � � �� L�Ir -- '� � � I ` r� `' "� I l i 1E '. 111` Ly 1I l I I T—. _ , I fr t I �� _fl' ��r � SUB, r f� f � �frL � , . 1 I i �+-• I _�•,��}��,I � A �` 4 1 Y�►.1 •_ — t _..-_._t }� �!lf--1f-11y _�� _ ! • # 'I 1� - ' 01 rr AT. ' ��- �- ;�' _•____ � _ r � ~` � �� _j RRY.sz] LA�dE II t V !I + ■ �/r J'V■ { — �I '+ r I^��{} I� •. �-� CHERRY" �� ; + I I SP IR LANE 5LJ8. I I ' 'V Z II...... 5 VILLA �E VILLAGE........................... o I�?•. I r I q� — , �''a►r Ii NO. 41 V, VIL '►Q', -� r-�..L�_ f_ �• ,' i3�fiDf ST ti CHERRY. �� f C , `. f �- HE RY 1 + �-� - � � �I SUBDIV SICo1;� - fit SUBDIVISIONArc_4 b lisu yl 1E 1 L II I LANE, L VIL GE 11► r I A r~ r- r _ I �``, �zAl �. DAY/ n NAvaRR °E� CITY OF RIDIAN MY 14 AM 9: 3 AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT THE OWNER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HAS MADE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REZONE OF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR REAL PROPERTY THAT LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN FROM I -L (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO L -O (LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT) AS DEFINED UNDER §11-2-408B(7) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID REZONING DESIGNATION TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. FINDINGS: 1. The owner of the following described property has made a written request for a re -zone of the zoning classification for the subject Real Property herein described from Y-L(Light Industrial) District to L -O (Limited Office) District as defined under §11-2- 408B(7) of the Municipal Code of the City of Meridian; and 2. The City of Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council having given notice RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 1 2.12 ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY OF MERIDIAN and conducted all public hearings in accordance with law and having issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law and Decision and Order granting the application for rezone; and 3. The real property which is the subject of this ordinance is legally described as: A parcel located in the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 and the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, and containing Lot 17 of Block 3 of the Meridian Business Park Subdivision on file in the office of the Recorder, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a brass cap monument marking the southeasterly corner of said SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 (one-quarter corner) from which an aluminum cap monument marking the southwesterly corner of said SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 bears S 89°20'30" W a distance of 1118.76 feet; Thence S 89020'30" W along the southerly boundary of said SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 a distance of 37.92 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 31'46'19" W a distance of 166.58 feet to a '/2 inch diameter iron pin marking an angle point on the westerly boundary of said Lot 17; Thence N 0°31' 11" E along the westerly boundary of said Lot 17 a distance of 2 45.0 9 feet to a 1/2 inch RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 2 2.12 ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY OF MERIDIAN diameter iron pin marking the northwesterly corner of said Lot 17; Thence S 89°47'03" E along the northerly boundary of said Lot 17 a distance of 255.95 feet to a I/.2 inch diameter iron pin marking the northeasterly corner of said Lot 17 Thence S 0°31' 11" W along the easterly boundary of said Lot 17 a distance of 384.79 feet to a point on the southerly boundary of said SW 114 of the SE 114; Thence S 89°46'06" W a distance of 129.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 2.12 acres and is subject to any easement existing or in use. SECTION 2. That the above-described real Property be, and the same is hereby re -zoned and designed (L-0) Limited Office District. SECTION 3. That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps depicting the City of Meridian land use zones in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4. All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 3 2.12 ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY OF MERIDIAN PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 1999. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF -THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of � , 1999. yoY ATT ST: City Cleric RE -ZONE ORDINANCE - 4 2.12 ACRES FIRE SUBSTATION CITY OF MERIDIAN IL; BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED - UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CONTINUED USE OF THE PROPERTY (2 BUILDINGS ON A SINGLE LOT IN HONOR PARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2) AS OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN A C -G ZONE LOCATED AT 357 E. WATERTOWER LANE, MERIDIAN, IDAHO JEFF HON/MII<E HON, APPLICANT. 05-10-00 Case No. CUP -00^0 19 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The above entitled conditional use permit application having come before the City Council on May 2, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Gary Smith, Public Works Director, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to City Council issued by the Planning and Zoning Commission who conducted a public hearing and the Council having heard and taken oral FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 1 f and written testimony-, and having duly considered the matter, the City Council hereby makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order to -wit: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for May 2, 2000, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing and the copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the May 2, 2000, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 2 3. This proposed development request is in an (C -G), General Retail and Service Commercial District, by reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code § 11-17-4, a public hearing was required before the City Council on this application. 4. The property is located at 357 E. Watertower Lane, Meridian, Idaho. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is Jeff and Mike Hon of INNTO-41- M44 6. Applicant is owner of Record. 7. The subject property is currently zoned C -G. The zoning district of C -G is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2. 8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for continued use of the property (2 buildings on a single lot) as Office/Warehouse. The C -G zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). 9. , The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 10. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City ordinance. 11. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRt1NTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 3 Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. 12. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed and the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the proposed use and development upon services delivered by political subdivisions providing services to the subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering departments as follows: 12.1 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 12.2 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 12.3 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. A11 site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 12.4 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-134C. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 4 12.5 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14-1 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 12.6 Applicant shall have determined the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions as prepared by a soils scientist with the design of site drainage plan. 12.7 Provide sidewallcs in accordance with City ordinance Section 12-5-2. 12.8 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 12.9 Sanitary sewer and water service to this site is planned and shall be provided by extending service lines to the proposed building site. 12.10 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 12.11 Applicant shall add two (2) new planters in the parking lot between Existing Building "A" and Proposed Building "B" and a landscape strip on the east and west sides of the new building. Applicant meets the landscape locations and they shall be required as part of the approved site plan. 12.12 As a PD, a minimum of 10% of the gross land area must be open space. The Applicant shall use the Eight Mile Lateral and its associated easement to help fulfill the ordinance requirement only if no fencing is erected between the easement and the project site to maintain the open feel. The Applicant shall calculate the total landscape area as a percentage of the total site area to demonstrate compliance and shall show such on the plan. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 5 12.13 The Fire Marshall and Building Official shall provide written confirmation that the 0' rear setback on the south property line is approved and meets all Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes. 12.14 One (1) three-inch (3") caliper tree shall be required per 1,500 sq. ft. of asphalt on the site as per City Ordinance. The "Project Data" box on the Site/Landscape Plan (Sheet Al) cites a total of 26,404 s.f. of asphalt area, and shall require 18 trees. 12.15 Applicant shall coordinate screened trash enclosure location and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company and provide a letter of approval from their office to Planning &. Zoning when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. All trash areas are to be enclosed by a screening fence on at least three (3) sides. 12.16 Handicap parking, associated signage and building construction shall meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 12.17 No details on the amount of office space (square footage) versus warehouse space in the new building was provided. If the entire site was office use (16,000 s.f.), a total of 40 stalls shall be required. A total of 44 are shown, which does meet the minimum requirement. 12.18 This conditional use permit shall be subject to review upon ten (10) days notice to the applicant. Transfer of the conditional use permit shall need to be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator for any new owners/tenants. Additional Recommendations and/or comments from Meridian Fire Department, Ada County Highway District, Nampa &, Meridian Irrigation Distric t and Sanitary Services, Inc. are as follows: 12.19 Fire Chief, Denny Bowers, requires that all codes, hydrant placements and fire sprinkler systems shall be approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 12.20 The ACHD shall require that all future design plans and construction shall be in accordance with the ACRD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 6 12.21 The Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District shall require that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. All laterals and waste ways shall be protected. All municipal surface drainage shall be retained on site. If any surface drainage leases the site, the Nampa &.Meridian Irrigation District shall review drainage plans. Developer shall comply with Idaho Code § 31-3805. 13. The proposed uses within the subject application will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance because: 13.1 ' The subject property is designated on the "Generalized Land Use Map" as "Commercial". 14. The uses proposedlArithin the subject application subject to the conditions herein ordered will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance or intended character of the general vicinity and that such uses will not change the intended essential character of the same area. 15. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 16. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. 17. . The uses proposed within the subject application will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRt1NTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 7 detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 18. The development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to the property. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use Planning Act of 19 75 " hereinafter referred to for convenience as the "Act" codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council may .exercise all the powers required and authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the establishment of a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67-6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development ordinance" at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridian City Code. 3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional use permits which a proposed use is otherwise prohibited by the terms of the ordinance but allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance which the City of Meridian has done in the adoption of its zoning ordinances. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MII<E HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 8 4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to granting the same that the evidential showing supports the finding that the following standards are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code § 11-17-3) a. Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City policy; b. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this Ordinance; C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; h. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in a General Retail and Service Commercial District (C -G), a public hearing shall be conducted with notice to be published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record within three FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 9 hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, which provides as follows: "Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and the Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided in Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before the Planning and Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the Commission is made, the application shall go before the City Council without a public hearing and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the Commission." 6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of the public hearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend that the application be approved, approved with conditions or denied. The Commission shall ensure that any approval or approval with conditions of an application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Plan, City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City Code § 11-17-6) 7. When the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may impose conditions of that approval that reasonably: A. Minimize adverse impact on other development; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 10 B. Control the sequence and timing of development; C. Control the duration of development; D. Assure that the development is maintained property; E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development; F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this Ordinance. 8. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby ORDER and this does Order that: 1. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a planned -unit development for the continued use of the property (2 buildings on a single lot in Honor Park- Subdivision No. 2) as office/warehouse, subject to the following conditions of use and development: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MII(E HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 11 1.1 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 1.2 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 1.3 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 1.4 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-134C. 1.5 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14-1 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 1.6 Applicant shall have determined the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions as prepared by a soils scientist with the design of site drainage plan. 1.7 Provide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2. 1.8 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 1.9 Sanitary sewer and water service to this site is planned and shall be provided by emending service lines to the proposed building site. 1.10 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re -Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 12 City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 1.11 Applicant shall add two (2) new planters in the parking lot between Existing Building "A" and Proposed Building "B" and a landscape strip on the east and west sides of the new building. Applicant meets the landscape locations and they shall be required as part of the approved site plan. 1.12 As a PD, a minimum of 10% of the gross land area must be open space. The Applicant shall use the Eight Mile Lateral and its associated easement to help fulfill the ordinance requirement only if no fencing is erected between the easement and the project site to maintain the open feel. The Applicant shall calculate the total landscape area as a percentage of the total site area to demonstrate compliance and shall show such on the plan. 1.13 , The Fire Marshall and Building Official shall provide written confirmation that the 0' rear setback on the south property line is approved and meets all Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes. 1.14 One (1) three-inch (3 ") caliper tree shall be required per 1,500 sq. ft. of asphalt on the site as per City Ordinance. The "Project Data" box on the Site/Landscape Plan (Sheet Al) cites a total of 26,404 s.f. of asphalt area, and shall require 18 trees. 1.15 Applicant shall coordinate screened trash enclosure location and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company and provide a letter of approval from their office to Planning &Zoning when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. All trash areas are to be enclosed by a screening fence on at least three (3) sides. 1.16 Handicap parking, associated signage and building construction shall meet the requirements of the .Americans with Disabilities Act. 1.17 No details on the amount of office space (square footage) versus warehouse space in the new building was provided. If the entire site was office use (16,000 s.f. ), a total of 40 stalls shall be required. A total of 44 are shown, which does meet the minimum requirement. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRt1NTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 13 1.18 This conditional use permit shall be subject to review upon ten (10) days notice to the applicant. Transfer of the conditional use permit shall need to be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator for any new owners/tenants. 1.19 Fire Chief, Denny Bowers, requires that all codes, hydrant placements and fire sprinkler systems shall be approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 1.20 The ACHD shall require that all future design plans and construction shall be in accordance with the ACRD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements. 1.21 . The Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District shall require that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. All laterals and waste ways shall be protected. All municipal surface drainage shall be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa &, Men* Irrigation District shall review drainage plans. Developer shall comply with Idaho Code § 31-3805. 2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-17-9. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. That the City Attorney draft an order Granting Conditional Use Permit in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 14 NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the &�L day of lhte-c� 2000. 61 ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED Q' COUNCILPERSON KEITH BIRD VOTED �`— COUNCILMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED COUNCILMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED C/ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: MOTION: APPROVED • DISAPPROVED: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MII<E HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 15 Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. tvAttitfff trill,, Of - By: Cly Clerk � SEAL msgIZ:\Work\M\Meridian 15350M\Hon CUPICUPFin4ngs. c Opp FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE / (CUP -00-019) - 16 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) JEFF HON/MIKE HON, FORA ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA ) PLANNED -UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ) CONTINUED USE OF THE PROPERTY (2 ) BUILDINGS ON A SINGLE LOT IN HONOR ) PARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2) AS OFFICE/ ) WAREHOUSE IN A C -G ZONE LOCATED AT ) 357 E. WATERTOWER LANE, MERIDIAN, ) IDAHO ) 05-10-00 CASE NO. CUP -00-019 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT This matter Coming before the City Council on the 16' clay of May, 2000, under the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-4 for final action on conditional use permit application and the Council having received and approving the Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the following action: 1. That the Applicant of the property is granted a conditional use permit for the proposed application request of a conditional use permit for the construction, development, maintenance and use for ahigh-tech manufacturing facility, as described in the SITE/LANDSCA.PE PLAN, Dated: 2/21/00, DRAWN BY: GIGS, CHECKED: HJC, JOB NO. CDS-231-00, SHEET Al, HONOR PARI WAREHOUSE LOT 3 BLI< 1 HONOR PARD SUBDN. #2, DESIGN STUDIO - ARCHITECT -PLANNER, and HON CONTRACTORS GEN./COM. CONSTRUCTION MIKE HON JEFF HON, Developers, and, for the development of the aforementioned planned -unit development for the continued use ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 1 OF 5 BY JEFF HONE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE 1 CUP -00-019 of the property (2 buildings on a single lot in Honor Park Subdivision No. 2) as office/warehouse and which property is described as: Lot 3 in Block 1 of Honor Park Subdivision No. 2, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 68 of Plats at pages 6959 and 6960, records of Ada County, Idaho. 2. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a planned -unit development for the continued use of the property (2 buildings on a single lot in Honor Park Subdivision No. 2) as office/warehouse, located at 357 E. Watertower Lane, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development: 2.1 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 2.2 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 11-13-4 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 2.3 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer shall be required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 2.4 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as to not direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4C. 2.5 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14-1 of the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. 2.6 Applicant shall have determined the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and submit a profile of the subsurface soil conditions as prepared by a soils scientist with the design of site drainage plan. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 2 OF 5 BY JEFF HONE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE 1 CUP -00-019 2.7 Provide sidewalks in accordance with City Ordinance Section 12-5-2. 2.8 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2.9 Sanitary sewer and water service to this site is planned and shall be provided by extending service lines to the proposed building site. 2.10 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 2.11 Applicant shall add two (2) new planters in the parking lot between Existing Building "A" and Proposed Building "B" and a landscape strip on the east and west sides of the new building. Applicant meets the landscape locations and they shall be required as part of the approved site plan. 2.12 . As a PD, a minimum of 10% of the gross land area must be open space. The Applicant shall use the Eight Mile Lateral and its associated easement to help fulfill the ordinance requirement only if no fencing is erected between the easement and the project site to maintain the open feel. The Applicant shall calculate the total landscape area as a percentage of the total site area to demonstrate compliance and shall show such on the plan. 2.13 The Fire Marshall and Building Official shall provide written confirmation that the 0' rear setback on the south property line is approved and meets all Uniform Building and Uniform Fire Codes. 2.14 One (1) three-inch (Y) caliper tree shall be required per 1,500 sq. ft. of asphalt on the site as per City Ordinance. The "Project Data" box on ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 3 OF 5 BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICEIWAREHOUSE 1 CUP -00-019 the Site/Landscape Plan (Sheet Al) cites a total of 26,404 s.f. of asphalt area, and shall require 18 trees. 2.15 Applicant shall coordinate screened trash enclosure location and construction requirements with Sanitary Service Company and provide a letter of approval from their office to Planning SL Zoning when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. All trash areas are to be enclosed by a screening fence on at least three (3) sides. 2.16 Handicap parking, associated signage and building construction shall meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2.17 No details on the amount of office space (square footage) versus warehouse space in the new building was provided. If the entire site was office use (16,000 s.f.), a total of 40 stalls shall be required. A total of 44 are shown, which does meet the minimum requirement. 2.18 This conditional use permit shall be subject to review upon ten (10) days notice to the applicant. Transfer of the conditional use permit shall need to be submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator for any new owners/tenants. Additional Recommendations and/or comments from Meridian Fire Department, Ada County Highway District, Nampa &. Meridian Irrigation Distric t and Sanitary Services, Inc. are as follows: 2.19 Fire Chief, Denny Bowers, requires that all codes, hydrant placements and fire sprinkler systems shall be approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 2.20 The ACRD shall require that all future design plans and construction shall be in accordance with the ACRD Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements. 2.21 , The Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District shall require that a Land Use Change/Site Development application be filed for review prior to final platting. All laterals and waste ways shall be protected. All municipal surface drainage shall be retained on site. If any surface ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 4 OF 5 BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICEIWAREHOUSE l CUP -00-0 19 r,. drainage leaves the site, the Nampa &.Meridian Irrigation District shall review drainage plans. Developer shall comply with Idaho Code § 31- 3805. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-8, a copy of which is attached to this permit. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the L6746- day of 2000. e�m I I, , , I I I kD% """It ert D. Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. Dated: --�o of: &P msgIZ:\Work\M\A4eridian 153 60M\Hon CUPICUPOr r SEAL ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 5 OF 5 BY JEFF HON/MIKE HON FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE 1 CUP -00-019 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA HIGH- TECH MANUFACTURING FACILITY IN THE TROUTNER BUSINESS PARD WHICH IS IN A C -O ZONE JOSEPH D. AND STACEY HEILKER, APPLICANT. 05-09-00 Case No. CUP -00-0 IS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE _R _�►_ 0_1 The above entitled conditional use permit application having come before the City Council on May 2, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant was George Blecha, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter and the Recommendations to City Council issued by the Planning and Zoning Commission who conducted a public hearing and the Council having heard and taken oral and written testimony, and having duly considered the matter, the City Council hereby makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order to -wit: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARI/ (CUP -00-018) - 1 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. A notice of a public hearing on the conditional use permit was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to the said public hearing scheduled for May 2, 2000, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing and the copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the May 2, 2000, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §67-6509, 6512, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5 as evidenced by the Affidavit of Mailing, and the Affidavit of Publication and Proof of Posting filed with the staff report. 3. This proposed development request is in an (C -G), General Retail and Service Commercial District, by reason of the provisions of the Meridian City Code § 11-17-4, a public hearing was required before the City Council on this application. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARD / (CUP -00-018) - 2 4. The property is located at the southeast corner of W. Pennwood Avenue and S. West 5' Avenue in the Troutner Business Park, Meridian, Idaho. Idaho. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is James H. Ballantyne of Boise, 6. Applicant is Joseph D. Heilker and Stacey Heillcer of Meridian. 7. The subject property is currently zoned C -G. The zoning district of GG is defined within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-7-2. 8. The proposed application requests a conditional use permit for ahigh-tech manufacturing facility. The C -G zoning designation within the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance requires a conditional use permit be obtained for most uses including those requested by the Applicant. (Meridian City Zoning and Development Ordinance, Section 11-8-1). 9. The Meridian City Council recognizes that the proposed application is in compliance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 10. The use proposed within the subject application will in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City Ordinance. 11. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivision and Development Ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, and Maps and the Ordinance establishing the Impact Area Boundary. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILI<ER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARI / (CUP -00-018) - 3 r f d 12. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed and the following is also found to be required to mitigate the effects of the proposed use and development upon services delivered by political subdivisions providing services to the subject real property within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian: Adopt the Recommendations of Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: 12.1 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance Section 11-13-4 and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements, and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 12.2 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. 12.3 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage or flashing signs will be permitted. 12.4 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 12.5 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 12.6 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re - Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARD / (CUP -00-018) - 4 the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 12.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 12.8 Applicant shall coordinate the location and construction requirements of the required trash enclosure with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and shall provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 12.9 Submit a letter of plan approval from Ada County Highway District when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 12.10 All required deciduous trees are to be a minimum of 3" caliper at the time of planting; any conifer trees are to be a minimum of 6-8" at planting. 12.11 Applicant shall be required to landscape southern boundary if the adjacent property is not purchased by the Applicant. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 12.12 Dedicate 45 -feet of right-of-way from the ultimate street centerline of Franklin Road abutting the parcel (20 additional feet) by means of recordation of the final subdivision plat or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 12.13 Provide a $2,023.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Franklin Road abutting the parcel (approximately 238 -feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of final plat, whichever occurs first. 12.14 If the site is developed prior to the District improving Franklin Road, Applicant shall construct aleft -turn deceleration lane on Franklin Road at SW 5th Street having 50 -feet of storage and a 40 to 1 taper. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARI / (CUP -00-018) - 5 12.1 S Provide a $425.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the parcel (50 -feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of final plat, whichever occurs first. 12.16 If the site is developed prior to the District improving Meridian Road, Applicant shall construct aleft -turn lane on Meridian Road at Pennwood Street having 50 -feet of storage with a 40 to 1 taper. 12.17 Construct all internal streets to a 41 -foot street section with 5 -foot wide sidewalks within a 58 -foot right-of-way. 12.18 Barrett Street and Pennwood Street shall be constructed with an ACHD acceptable turnaround improved with pavement, standard vertical curb and gutter. Depending on the design of the turnaround, "no parking" signs shall be required as determined by Traffic Services staff. 12.19 SW 3rd Street shall be extended from Fulmer Street to the site's northern property line. 12.20 SW 5th Street shall be extended to the south boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnaround. 12.21 SW 3rd Street shall be extended to the south boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnaround. 12.22 Access to SW 5th Street shall be restricted for a minimum of 175 -feet south of the future back of curb on Franklin Road. 12.23 Driveways shall be a maximum of 30 -feet wide with a minimum offset between driveways or from street intersections of 50 -feet as measured near edge to near edge. 12.24 Applicant shad have a notation on the final plat that states, "Direct lot or parcel access to Franklin Road is prohibited." 12.25 Align SW 5th Street with the main entrance to Hoff's (approximately 160 - feet to the east) on the north side of Franklin Road. The centerlines of SW 5th Street and the Hoff's driveway shall be located a maximum of 5 -feet apart. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK/ (CUP -00-018) - 6 12.26 Provide a cross access easement to the abutting parcel at the southwest corner of Franklin Road and SW 5th Street. 12.27 Construct a roadway in the existing easement from SW 3rd Street to Meridian Road. This roadway shall be a minimum of 29 -foot width. Curb, gutter and sidewalk are not required. The District shall delete the requirement for this roadway once SW 5th Street and SW 3rd Street are connected to Corporate Drive. 12.28 Conduct a traffic signal warrant analysis for the Franklin Road/SW 5th Street intersection,prior to approval of the final plat of the last phase. If a traffic signal is warranted, Applicant shall deposit $75,000 to the Public Rights -of -Way Road Trust Fund for the cost of a traffic signal prior to final plat approval of the last phase. 12.29 Restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, as required by District policy, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. Adopt the Recommendations of the Nampa Meridian Irrigation District as follows: 12.30 Requires all laterals and wasteways be protected. 12.31 All municipal surface drainage shall be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa &. Meridian Irrigation District shall review drainage plans. 13. The proposed uses within the subject application will be harmonious with and in accordance with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance because: 13.1 The subject property is designated on the "Generalized Land Use Map" as "Commercial". 14. The uses proposed within the subject application subject to the conditions herein ordered will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARD / (CUP -00-018) - 7 and appropriate in appearance or intended character of the general vicinity and that such uses will not change the intended essential character of the same area. 15. The uses proposed within the subject application will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. 16. The uses proposed within the subject application will be served adequately by central public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, and sewer. 17. The uses proposed within the subject application will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 18. The development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of natural or scenic feature of major importance relating to the property. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the "Local Land Use PlanningAct of 1975" hereinafter referred to for convenience as the "Act" codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code (I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council may exercise all the powers required and authorized under the "Act" except the power to adopt ordinances by the establishment of a Planning and Zoning Commission by ordinance pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67 - FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILI<ER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK/ (CUP -00-018) - 8 6504 which the City Council of the City of Meridian has established by the passage of the "City of Meridian Zoning and Development ordinance" at Titles XI and XII, Chapter I, Meridian City Code. 3. As part of a zoning ordinance the City Council can, subject to hearing and notice provision required, provide for the process of special and/or conditional use permits which a proposed use is otherwise prohibited by the terms of the ordinance but allowed with conditions under the specific provisions of the ordinance Which the City of Meridian has done in the adoption of its zoning ordinances. 4. The City Council has the duty and responsibility to review the facts and circumstances of each application for special use permit to determine prior to granting the same that the evidential showing supports the finding that the following standards are met and that the proposed development: (Meridian City Code § 11-17-3) a. Will, in fact, constitute a conditional use as determined by City policy; b. Will be harmonious With and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and this ordinance; C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARI / (CUP -00-018) - 9 f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; h. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. 5. Prior to granting a conditional use permit in a General Retail and Service Commercial District (C -G), a public hearing shall be conducted with notice to be published and provided to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the land under consideration for the conditional use permit all in accordance with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-5 City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance, which provides as follows: "Prior to approving a Conditional Use Permit, the applicant and the Commission and Council shall follow notice and hearing procedures provided in Chapter 15 of this Title. Provided, however, that conditional use applications for land in Old Town and in industrial and commercial districts shall only be required to have one public hearing which shall be held before the Planning and Zoning Commission; and after the recommendation of the Commission is made, the application shall go before the City Council without a public hearing and the Council may approve, deny, or modify the recommendation of the Commission." 6. Following the public hearing and within 45 days after the conclusion of the public hearing the Commission shall, transmit its recommendations to the Meridian City Council with supportive reasons. The Commission shall recommend that the application be approved, approved with conditions or denied. The Commission shall ensure that any FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILICER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK / (CUP -00-018) - 10 approval or approval with conditions of an application shall be in accordance with Meridian Comprehensive Ilan, City of Meridian Zoning and Development ordinance, and Idaho State law. (Meridian City Code § 11-17-6 ) 7. When the City Council approves a conditional use permit it may impose conditions of that approval that reasonably: A. Minimize adverse impact on other development; B. Control the sequence and timing of development; C. Control the duration of development; D. Assure that the development is maintained property; E. Designate the exact location and nature of the development; F. Require the provision for on-site public facilities or services; and G. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required, in this Ordinance. 8. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. 629, January 4, 1994 and Maps. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby ORDER and this does Order that: 1. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for a FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARI/ (CUP -00-018) - 11 high-tech manufacturing facility, subject to the following conditions of use and development: 1.1 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance Section 11-13-4 and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements, and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 1.2 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. 1.3 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage or flashing signs will be permitted. 1.4 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 1.5 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 1.6 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re - Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment/shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 1.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 1.8 Applicant shall coordinate the location and construction requirements of the required trash enclosure with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and shall FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK/ (CUP -00-018) - 12 provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 1.9 Submit a letter of plan approval from Ada County Highway District when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 1.10 All required deciduous trees are to be a minimum of 3" caliper at the time of planting; any conifer trees are to be a minimum of 6-8" at planting. 1.11 Applicant shall be required to landscape southern boundary if the adjacent property is not purchased by the Applicant. 1.12 Dedicate 45 -feet of right-of-way from the ultimate street centerline of Franklin Road abutting the parcel (20 additional feet) by means of recordation of the final subdivision plat or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 1.13 Provide a $2,023.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Franklin Road abutting the parcel (approximately 238 -feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of final plat, whichever occurs first. 1.14 If the site is developed prior to the District improving Franklin Road, Applicant shall construct aleft -turn deceleration lane on Franklin Road at SW 5th Street having 50 -feet of storage and a 40 to 1 taper. 1.15 Provide a $425.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the parcel (50 -feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of final plat, whichever occurs first. 1.16 If the site is developed prior to the District improving Meridian Road, Applicant shall construct aleft -turn lane on Meridian Road at Pennwood Street having 50 -feet of storage with a 40 to 1 taper. 1.17 Construct all internal streets to a 41 -foot street section with 5 -foot wide sidewalks within a 58 -foot right-of-way. 1.18 Barrett Street and Pennwood Street shall be constructed with an ACHD acceptable turnaround improved with pavement, standard vertical curb and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILI<ER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK/ (CUP -00-018) - 13 gutter. Depending on the design of the turnaround, "no parking" signs shall be required as determined by Traffic Services staff. 1.19 SW 3rd Street shall be extended from Fulmer Street to the site's northern property line. 1.20 _ SW 5th Street shall be extended to the south boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnaround. 1.21 SW 3rd Street shall be extended to the south boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnaround. 122 Access to SW 5th Street shall be restricted for a minimum of 175 -feet south of the future back of curb on Franklin Road. 1.23 Driveways shall be a maximum of 30 -feet wide with a minimum offset between driveways or from street intersections of 50 -feet as measured near edge to near edge. 1.24 Applicant shall have a notation on the final plat that states, "Direct lot or parcel access to Franklin Road is prohibited." 1.25 Align SW 5th Street with the main entrance to Hoff's (approximately 160 - feet to the east) on the north side of Franklin Road. The centerlines of SW 5th Street and the Hoff s driveway shall be located a maximum of 5 -feet apart. 1.26 Provide a cross access easement to the abutting parcel at the southwest corner of Franklin Road and SW 5th Street. 1.27 Construct a roadway in the existing easement from SW 3rd Street to Meridian Road. This roadway shall be a minimum of 29 -foot width. Curb, gutter and sidewalk are not required. The District shall delete the requirement for this roadway once SW 5th Street and SW 3rd Street are connected to Corporate Drive. 1.28 Conduct a traffic signal warrant analysis for the Franklin Road/SW 5th Street intersection, prior to approval of the final plat of the last phase. If a traffic signal is warranted, Applicant shall deposit $75,000 to the Public FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK/ (CUP -00-018) - 14 Rights -of -Way Road Trust Fund for the cost of a traffic signal prior to final plat approval of the last phase. 1.29 Restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, as required by District policy, shall be placed on fixture development of this parcel. 1.30 Requires all laterals and wasteways be protected. 1.31 All municipal surface drainage shall be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa Sz Meridian Irrigation District shall review drainage plans. 2. The conditions shall be reviewable by the Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-17-9. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. That the City Attorney draft an Order Granting Conditional Use Permit in accordance with this Decision, which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. NOTICE of FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the conditional use permit may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARI / (CUP -00-018) - 15 decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ` � `r day of �2� , 2000. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILPERSON KEITH BIRD VOTED COUNCILMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED COUNCILMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED ` DATED: 57-16--00 MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. Of By: ��' ted xty Clerk BEL msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian 153 d0M\Troutner Busilss a Findings ore f1jP FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY JOSEPH HEILI<ER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK/ (CUP -00-018) - 16 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL 05-0900 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) CASE NO. CUP -00-018 JOSEPH D. AND STACEY HEILICER, FORA ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AHIGH- ) ORDER OF TECH MANUFACTURING FACILITY IN THE ) CONDITIONAL TROUTNER BUSINESS PARD WHICH IS IN ) APPROVAL OF AN G -G ZONE, LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- ) CONDITIONAL USE EAST CORNER OF W. PENNWOOD AVENUE) PERMIT AND S. WEST 5TH AVENUE, MERIDIAN, ) IDAHO ) This matter coming before the City Council on the 2nd clad- of May, 2000, under the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-4 for final action on conditional use permit application and the Council having received and approving the Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission the Council takes the following action: 1. That the Applicant of the property is granted a conditional use permit for the proposed application request of a conditional use permit for the construction, development, maintenance and use for ahigh-tech manufacturing facility, as described in the SITE PLAN, Dated: 02/17/00, DRAWN BY: GRB, CHECKED: GRB, JOB NO. 98/3, SHEET NUMBER A-0.1, GEORGE R. BLECHA, AIA, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING, and JOSEPH D. AND STACEY HEILKER, Developers, and, for the development of the aforementioned high-tech manufacturing facility and which property is described as: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 1 OF 7 BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK 1 CUP -00--0 18 A parcel of land lying within the northeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian City, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 13; thence West along the north line of said section and the centerline of Franklin Road, a distance of 1328.20 feet to a brass cap monument marking the East 1/16th corner of said Section 13; thence continuing West along said section line, a distance of 362.70 feet to the real point of beginning; thence South 00 degree 08'25" West a distance of 613.70 feet; thence North 72 degrees 09'35" West a distance of 316.95 feet to the East boundary of Franklin Square Subdivision as recorded in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 5587 &.5588; thence South 00 degree 08'58" West along said East boundary a distance of 1363.46 feet; thence South 85 degrees 41' 00" East a distance of 147.41 feet to an iron pin; thence North 79 degrees 55'00" East a distance of 523.48 feet; thence North 00 degree 13'31" East a distance of 142.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 52' 13" East a distance of 790.35 feet to an iron pin; thence North 00 degree 23' 12" East a distance of 329.06 feet to an iron pin; thence North 89 degrees 56'06" West a distance of 128.95 feet to an iron pin; thence North 00 degree 18'07" East a distance of 663.29 feet; thence North 89 degrees 58' 05" West a distance of 6 63.2 1 feet; thence ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 2 OF 7 BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARD 1 CUP -00-0 18 North oo degree 13'31" East a distance of 349.76 feet; thence Nest a distance of 123.99 feet; thence North oo degree 13' 48" East a distance of 313. lO feet; thence West a distance of 238.73 feet to the real point of beginning. Except that portion lying within Franklin Road right-of-way. Together with A perpetual non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress being 50 feet in width and lying North of the following described property; A portion of the Northeast quarter of the Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the East quarter corner of said Section 13; thence North 0 degree 22'35" East 1107.00 feet along the easterly boundary of said Section 13; to the real point of beginning; thence 89 degrees 55'45" West 533.12 feet. 2. That the above named applicant is granted a conditional use permit for the high-tech manufacturing facility, located at the southeast corner of W. Pennwood Avenue and S. West 5t' Avenue in the Troutner Business Park, Meridian, Idaho, subject to the following conditions of use and development: 2.1 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance Section 11-13-4 and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements, and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 2.2 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance Section 11-13-4.C. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 3 OF 7 BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK l OUP -00-018 2.3 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage or flashing signs will be permitted. 2.4 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 2.5 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2.6 Assessment fees for water and sewer service are determined during the building plan review process. Applicant shall be required to enter into a Re Assessment Agreement with the City of Meridian for all commercial uses. An assessment agreement is a vehicle that protects the City of Meridian and the Developer in the event that estimated assessments are not in line with actual usages. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the developer for over payment of assessments and payment to the City of Meridian of any shortfall in assessments. The overpayment shortfall is determined after adequate historical usage. 2.7 As part of a conditional use permit, the City of Meridian may impose restrictions and conditions in addition to current City Ordinances. 2.8 Applicant shall coordinate the location and construction requirements of the required trash enclosure with Meridian Sanitary Service, Inc., and shall provide a letter of approval from their office when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 2.9 Submit a letter of plan approval from Ada County Highway District when applying for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance. 2.10 All required deciduous trees are to be a minimum of 3" caliper at the time of planting; any conifer trees are to be a minimum of 6-8" at planting. 2.11 Applicant shall be required to landscape southern boundary if the adjacent property is not purchased by the Applicant. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 4 OF 7 BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TRGUTNER BUSINESS PARK 1 CUP -00-0 18 2.12 Dedicate 45 -feet of right-of-way from the ultimate street centerline of Franklin Road abutting the parcel (20 additional feet) by means of recordation of the final subdivision plat or prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 2.13 Provide a $2,023.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Franklin Road abutting the parcel (approximately 238 -feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of final plat, whichever occurs first. 2.14 If the site is developed prior to the District improving Franklin Road, Applicant shall construct aleft -turn deceleration lane on Franklin Road at SW 5th Street having 50 -feet of storage and a 40 to 1 taper. 2.15 Provide a $425.00 deposit to the Public Rights -of -Way Trust Fund for the cost of constructing 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Meridian Road abutting the parcel (50 -feet) prior to issuance of any required permits or District approval of final plat, whichever occurs first. 2.16 If the site is developed prior to the District improving Meridian Road, Applicant shall construct aleft -turn lane on Meridian Road at Pennwood Street having 50 -feet of storage with a 40 to 1 taper. 2.17 Construct all internal streets to a 41 -foot street section with 5 -foot wide sidewalks within a 58 -foot right-of-way. 2.18 Barrett Street and Pennwood Street shall be constructed with an ACHD acceptable turnaround improved with pavement, standard vertical curb and gutter. Depending on the design of the turnaround, "no parking" signs shall be required as determined by Traffic Services staff. 2.19 SW 3rd Street shall he extended from Fulmer Street to the site's northern property line. 2.20 SW 5th Street shall be extended to the south boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnaround. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PAGE 5 OF 7 BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK /CUP -00-018 2.21 SW 3rd Street shall be extended to the south boundary of the site with a temporary easement for a paved turnaround. 2.22 Access to SAN 5th Street shall be restricted for a minimum of 175 -feet south of the future back of curb on Franklin Road. 2.23 Driveways shall be a maximum of 30 -feet wide with a minimum offset between driveways or from street intersections of 50 -feet as measured near edge to near edge. 2.24 Applicant shall have a notation on the final plat that states, "Direct lot or parcel access to Franklin Road is prohibited. " 2.25 Align SW 5th Street with the main entrance to Hoff's (approximately 160 -feet to the east) on the north side of Franklin Road. The centerlines of SW 5th Street and the Hoffs driveway shall be located a maximum of 5 -feet apart. 2.26 Provide a cross access easement to the abutting parcel at the southwest corner of Franklin Road and SW 5th Street. 2.27 Construct a roadway in the existing easement from SW 3rd Street to Meridian Road. This roadway shall be a minimum of 29 -foot width. Curb, gutter and sidewalk are not required. The District shall delete the requirement for this roadway once SW 5th Street and SW 3rd Street are connected to Corporate Drive. 2.28 Conduct a traffic signal warrant analysis for the Franklin Road/SW 5th Street intersection, prior to approval of the final plat of the last phase. If a traffic signal is warranted, Applicant shall deposit $75,000 to the Public Rights -of - Way Road Trust Fund for the cost of a traffic signal prior to final plat approval of the last phase. 2.29 Restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, as required by District policy, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 2.30 Requires all laterals and wasteways be protected. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 5 OF 7 BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK 1 CUP -00-0 18 2.31 All municipal surface drainage shall be retained on site. If any surface drainage leaves the site, the Nampa &.Meridian Irrigation District shall review drainage plans. 3. The above conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application for a conditional use permit. 4. Notice to Permit Holder, this conditional use permit is not transferable without complying with the provisions of Meridian City Code § 11-17-8, a copy of which is attached to this permit. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the r-Ak day of 72000. -- r i Rob D. Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Zity Clerk Dated: —&1020 msg/Z:1W ork\M\Meridian 153 60M\Troutner Business Park\CUPorder ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PAGE 7 OF 7 BY JOSEPH HEILKER FOR TROUTNER BUSINESS PARK 1 CUP -00-0 18 Of- SEAL ifSEAL BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P.A., FOR A VARIANCE IN THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ALLOWING NO OFF-STREET PARKING FOR GENERATIONS PARD PLAZA LOCATED AT EAST I ST STREET AND WEST IDAHO, MERIDIAN, IDAHO 05-05-00 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE The above entitled matter coming on regularly for public hearing before the City Council on May 2, 2000, and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying was the Applicant ,Gary Benoit, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant was Stan Cole, and appearing and testifying was John Wasson, and no one appeared in opposition, and the City Council having received the transmittal to agencies and having received the variance application, having heard the testimony presented, being fully advised in the premises does hereby make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Laver and order of Decision, as follows to -wit: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 1 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A. l GENERATIONS PARD PLAZA I FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The City Council takes judicial notice of its Zoning, Subdivisions and Development Ordinances codified at Title 11 Municipal Code of the City of Meridian and all current zoning maps thereof and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian. adopted December 21, 1993 ordinance #629 — January 4, 1994 and Maps. 2. The requirements of Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 6516 and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 12-11-3 as evidenced in the record of this matter. 3. The Applicant is Cole /Associates Architects, P.A., whose address is 960 Broadway, Suite 240, Boise, Idaho 83706. 4. The owner of the property is Stewart Laney Benoit, whose address is 910 Main Street, Suite 240, Boise, Idaho 83702 5. The location of the subject property is located in Old Town at East 1't Street and West Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. 6. The legal description of the property appertains to the real property that is included within the Vicinity Map as appears in the record of proceeds of this matter, and is described as follows: Lot 4 in Block 5 of the ORIGINAL TOWNSITE OF MERIDIAN, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 1 of Plats at Page 29, records of Ada Counter, Idaho. 7. The present land use of subject property is presently zoned as (0-T) Old FINDINGS ' OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 2 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARLkNCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A.1 GENERATIONS PARD PLAZA. I Town District which has been used as retail, but the property is presently vacant and in need of repair. 8. The proposed land use of subject property is to develop the subject property in the following manner: First Floor -Pizza Restaurant and Second Floor - offices. 9. That a vicinity map, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", consisting of five pages, of the proposed scale approved by the City Council showing property lines, existing streets, proposed district and such other items as required have been furnished. 10. The Applicant seeks a variance of the following provision of the Meridian City Code, § 11-13 -5 B. 5 . , SCHEDULE OF PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS; RECREATION OR ENTERTAINMENT and in the O -T zone, which provides as follows: 11-13-5 B. 5. RECREATION OR ENTERTAINMENT: TYPE OF USE Bowling alleys Outdoor swimming pools, public or community or club PARIQNG SPACE REQUIRED 4 for each alley or lane plus 1 additional space for each 100 sq. ft. of the area used for restaurant, cocktail lounge or similar use a) 1 for each S persons capacity plus 1 for each 4 seats b) 1 for each 30 sq. ft. floor area used for seating purposes; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND --- Page 3 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARLkNCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A. / GENERATIONS PARD PLAZA I Restaurants, nightclubs, cocktail lounges, and taverns Skating rinks (ice or roller skating) or c) The greater of the above 2 options 1 for each 200 sq. ft. of floor area 1 for each 5 seats 11. All property owners within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries have been notified by mail, and their mailing addresses may be obtained from the list on file with the Planning and Zoning Department. 12. The characteristics of the subject property which prevent compliance with the requirements of the ordinance are that the proposed size cannot hold any of the parking required. Replacing/renovating a dilapidated retail building that has the "downtown" character is all that the owner intends to do, giving new life to this current eyesore. 13. The minimum requirements of the ordinance that need to be reduced to permit the proposed use would be the elimination of the requirement of 21 spaces for retail and office parking, as the only parking that is available is the city parking behind the building. 14. The difficulty or hardship which would result if the requirements of the ordinance were applied to the subject property is that the building could not be used at all if the minimum off-street parking was required. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 4 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARL&NCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A. / GENERATIONS PARD PLAZA I 15. The unusual or peculiar circumstances which indicate that regulations of the ordinance should not be strictly complied with are that this project would encourage a high density urban downtown that is pedestrian orientated and not sprawling. The parking ordinance does not encourage this kind of city scape. 16. The special conditions and circumstances that exist are that the property is bordered by a city park and contains limited parking facilities. 17. A literal interpretation of the provisions of the ordinance would deprive the Applicant rights because many of the downtown businesses in the area have less than the required parking spaces. 18. The existence of special circumstances or conditions affecting the property is that the limited property sizes in the downtown area make it difficult to provide parking, which is not the fault of the property owners. 19. Granting the variance would maintain rights which would be afforded to others in the same situation. 20. The Comprehensive Plan for the Old Town District is to encourage its renewal and expansion of the Historical core, to delineate a centralized activity center, medium to high density uses is encouraged, to provide mix of activities necessary to establish a truly urban city center, but adequate parking and traffic flow is a concern. 21. The variance would allow the owner to maximize the potential site in FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 5 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A.1 GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA I order to generate a fair return on investment and to offset the cost of the land and development costs. The proposed building responds to urban design standards by providing a mixed use development with pedestrian orientated features. 22. The granting of the requested variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area of the proposed plat, and, in fact, the development of the plat in accordance with the conditions of approval and the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance will prevent the conditions which are the source of the complaints raised in the public hearing of this matter. 23. The granting of this variance will not have an effect of altering the interest and purpose of the Subdivision or Development Ordinance and/or the City's Comprehensive Plan for the reasons stated above. 24. The applicant paid the fee established by the City Council for application variance. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The City of Meridian has authority pursuant to the enactment of the Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975 codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, and in particular, by the provisions of Idaho Code § 67-6516 to provide as part of its zoning ordinance for the process of applications for variance permits. 2. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority of Idaho Code § 67-6516 FINDINGS of FACT AND CONCLUSIONS of LAW AND -- Page 6 of 10 ORDER of DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A.1 GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA I by the enactment as a part of its Zoning and Development Ordinance variances, as set forth in Meridian City Code § 11-18. 3. That the requirements for the processing of a variance request are set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509, 6516 and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-17-5. 4. Application and standards for variances are set forth in Meridian City Code § 11-18-2, and the findings which are required are set forth in Meridian City Code § 11- 18-3, include required findings that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that strict application of the provisions of Zoning and Development Ordinance would clearly be impracticable and unreasonable, and a finding that strict compliance with the requirements of the Zoning and Development Ordinance would result in extraordinary hardship to the owner, subdivider or developer because unusual topography, the nature or condition of adjacent development, or other physical conditions or other conditions that make strict compliance with the ordinance unreasonable under the circumstances, or that the conditions and requirements of said ordinance will result in inhibiting the achievements or the objectives of the ordinance, and that the granting of a specified variance will not be detrimental to the public's welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which the property is situated, and that such variance will not have the effect of altering the interest and purposes of the Zoning and Development Ordinance and the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAV" AND -- Page 7 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A.1 GENERATIONS PARD PLAZA I 5 . Meridian City Code, § 11-13 -5 B. 5 . , S CHEDULE OF PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS; RECREATION OR ENTERTAINMENT in the O -T zone provides as follows: 11-13 -5 B. 5. RECREATION OR ENTERTAINMENT: TYPE OF USE Bowling alleys Outdoor swimming pools, public or community or club Restaurants, nightclubs, cocktail lounges, and taverns Skating rinks (ice or roller skating) PARIQNG SPACE REQUIRED 4 for each alley or lane plus 1 additional space for each 100 sq. ft. of the area used for restaurant, cocktail lounge or similar use a) 1 for each 5 persons capacity plus 1 for each 4 seats b) 1 for each 30 sq. ft. floor area used for seating purposes; or c) The greater of the above 2 options 1 for each 200 sq. ft. of floor area 1 for each 5 seats DECISION AND ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: 1. That the Applicant is hereby granted a variance from the off-street parking space requirements for Generations Park Plaza I in Old Town. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page S of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VAR1ANCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A. / GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA I NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which maybe adversely affected by the issuance or denial of a variance authorizing a variance of the Schedule of Parking Space Requirements; Recreation or Entertainment in the 0-T Zone as provided in the Section 11-13-5 B. 5. and may within twenty-eight (2 8) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the day of lha� 12000. ROLL CALL: COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED_ COUNCILPERSON TAMMY deWEERD VOTED--(�� COUNCILPERSON CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED MAYOR ROBERT D. COME (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: .511� — �o FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND -- Page 9 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE 1 VAR. -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCIHITECTS. P.A.1 GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA I MOTION: APPROVED: DISAPPROVED: Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department, and the City Attorney office. 4t Of �{ .� 'Ospoaq A 5 Ik By. Dated. w eit Clerk SEAL r M msg/ZAWork\M\Meridian 15360M\Generations Plaza VARTfUsGrantVariance �'� ►^,�� FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND Page 10 of 10 ORDER OF DECISION GRANTING A VARIANCE 1 VAR -00-007 COLE 1 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. P.A.1 GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA I d.y: City or Uorician; 2088888854; uar .21 -00 2:23PU; P290 519 f A ilk I L NEI- i i -•- - _ ..'- aimE • r. � �� Uri w~ '` 1 � �� • w • � . a sm EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 1 OF 5 . 1 j}r 1 1 3 �'i � �• if � ..►_-..��r 1 • � .��_ 1J�Y--•r46--�+r�•�}^� C_w''Xi�-.i.�.`-'.W+:��l:.T�.i�Y_�ti �.7'=Zr`-• _ • �� -3��J '-.^.... _........� ......« j ��.��'•'�t��1-. T ..._-.�'7� rte_` - �� ..-�..............� !• -•---� .a.�rMw.a.fltYl.•w.I'- _V-a�s3Y : �,.r.�....--.. t�i�.,�........-.�..«........r_.• _ ft\ .... ccie I associates, P. A h'' �rC 0 0 c,* rP►m�r�u� STREc'T� GENERATIONS PARK PLAZA I 5rE� EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 2 OF 5 SOUTH ELEVATION SC -A -L& Vr-f-T .13 - RD NORTH ELEVATION L 1 71i a u --n I t3 'IT Mow a WEST ELEVATION SCALE MOW PCEY NOTES *MOO C"A 00"Am mlVMftwAlF SA&MME&M (D Sam bwhmg am w 61AM —'sam S S vmmcm-� 00-ts uwr FWp6M Tro.-M CAP % aft P*ftft TM& CMW" "go P�qft VOL Ulm Pam?M ML RmC Vcjm e El OWVC^. .00-n so= *mean" %wom CA) W& mcclw a" El(D vmcpaAw *am coufam El romm.1m rftm 0mu ftw tows= Elrom S V -%w � own 3 XAUM%L MOW OM& cole I associates, P. A " Or(r-zz�hdGENERATIONS PARK PLAZA 1 � 1� f 11"' -L-M440 EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 3 OF 5 «-� '� ' IM ya "air• j .� i Ell � �, �•� I•r� rv�r•'+ �.l�� ^r` -ti .-, r. �r►. � .-•. {-. ` r. � 3�� ,. � 2�---,moi-'�� J ! `�,l •� MAW FLOOR arnt rw+� ►� �`i r .�� vi�..i FL. cola [ associates, P. a EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 4 OF 5 UPPER FLOOR ac." 1~4r E-)XIL-11IBIT "A" PAGE 5 OF 5 cola I associates, P. A. � Ci.S� 7,+149 �� f_ 0W .r.F=10E i i i {}'=iC= Cr='cz rJ' Z� 'tiF: - � r��i.._ I n., __ W • I�,.. 'F f! UPPER FLOOR ac." 1~4r E-)XIL-11IBIT "A" PAGE 5 OF 5 cola I associates, P. A. f r. MAY — 3 2000 CITY OP MERIU1APa' DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR 05/17/00 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, May 16, 2000, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on May 17, 2000, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (No response.) MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $3 1, 187.19. r' r L CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:28am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Custorner.Cust No 9900000 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Nan-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 1.1360.1 AKERS, GEN EVA 289.51 205.32 84.19 _ - 02/11/2000 176.04 - none 2.4740.1 ALBRECHT, JUDY 83.59 55.68 27.91 - - 03/08/2000 47.95 - none 21.0184.1 ALLEN, ROBERT 114.56 80.52 34.04 - - 02/17/2000 34.04 - none 31.3422.1 ALLEN, TIM 114.84 76.97 37.87 - - 02/22/2000 90.53 - none 20.1510.1 ALLRED, JAY D. 113.61 79.57 34.04 - - 04/05/2000 43.40 - none 34.2730.1 ALVEREZ, ROSALIO 90.32 58.28 31.74 .30 - 02128/2000 50.00 - none 51.0050.1 AMYX FAMILY LIMITED 558.31 - - _ 558.31 - none 21.1784.1 ANDERSEN, SHARRON 95.97 53.99 26.38 15.60 - 04/19/2000 60.00 - none 2.0888.1 ANDERSON, DEAN 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 04106/2000 24.08 - none 2.0860.1 ANDERSON, DEAN 106.57 82.49 24.08 - - 04/10/2000 40.28 - none 33.3572.1 ANDERSON, KATHY 107.44 95.45 11.99 - - 03/17/2000 40.00 - none 2.6300.1 ANSON, PATRICIA 126.26 83.72 42.54 - - 03/27/2000 40.00 - none 68.0070.1 ARES, TONY 166.52 83.12 37.87 45.53 - 04/10/2000 40.00 - none 2.2110.1 ARMAS, SAMUEL 197.53 136.11 61.42 - - 04/1012000 71.00 - none 22.2296.1 ARMENTROUT, GARY 102.12 71.91 30.21 - - 02/1612000 37.01 - none 21.1708.1 ARTE, MICHELLE & RICK 138.46 98.86 39.60 - - 03/29/2000 51.46 - none 65.0658.1 ASHLEY, SHON 101.51 65.94 35.57 - - 03/06/2000 35.57 - none 21.2212.1 ASMUSEN, RICH & MELISSA 149.31 103.78 45.53 - - 03/31/2000 64.68 - none 21.1930.2 BAILEY, BRUCE 716.79 584.37 47.06 85.36 - - 21.2736.1 BAILEY, MICHELLE 224.48 144.37 37.87 42.24 - 04/21/2000 104.00 - none 2.3550.2 BAILEY, PEGGY 60.60 48.16 12.44 - - 04/05/2000 50.00- 22.1220.1 BAILEY, THOMAS 144.39 87.37 57.02 - - 02/23/2000 53,19 - none 3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 191.49 134.47 57.02 - - 02124/2000 112.81 - none 50.4270.1 BAKER, STEVEN 187.30 103.43 83.87 - - 04/07/2000 81.53 - none 21.0052.1 BALDWIN, ROBERT 81.74 55.36 26.38 - - 03/10/2000 78.08 - none 69.0138.1 BANG, JAMES & PEGGY SUE 119.90 78.20 41.70 - - 03/27/2000 37.87 - none 69.0590.1 BAPTISTE, MONTGOMERY 201.17 148.62 52.55 - - 04/10/2000 50.00 - none 69.0484.2 BARBER, CURTIS 111.91 97.35 14.56 - - - 33.1862.1 BARKER, JOHN 194.21 122.30 71.91 - - 03/17/2000 72.00 - none 46.0106.1 BARNES, DAVID 100.61 70.40 30.21 - - 03/09/2000 34.04 - none 4.1430.1 BARNEY, MARY R 94.46 64.25 30.21 - - 04/10/2000 30.21 - none 21.0464.1 BARR, J ERROD F 68.08 56.45 11.63 -- - 03/15/2000 79.00 - none 74.2822.1 BARR, KENNETH 237.40 157.40 80.00 - - 03/01/2000 243.16 - none 42.1966.1 BARRY, CLAY A 153.14 92.29 60.85 - - 02/25/2000 49.36 - none 31.3060.1 BASTIAN, DAVID 259.40 86.32 39.40 43.23 90.45 03/03/2000 50.00 - none 2.0360.1 BEACH, DEVIN 90.34 69.77 20.57 - - 03/28/2000 55.00 _ none 31.3042.1 BEAN, ALAN & JENNY 208.33 149.78 58.55 - - 04/12/2000 70.04 - none 1.0030.1 BEAUDOIN, JOHN R 78.46 54.64 23.82 - _ 04/11/2000 42.00 - none 34.0942.1 BECK, JIM 114.48 90.40 24.08 - - 04/04/2000 66.21 - none 32.0950.1 BECKER, NICHOLAS 103.09 72.88 30.21 - - 0311612.000 72.05 - none 32.0872.1 BECKER, ROGER F. 128.32 88.92 39.40 - - 02/14/2000 95.49 - none 46.0448.1 BEERY, LON 108.08 74.85 33.23 - - 04/13/2000 20.57 - none 31.1004.1 BEHNER, ROBERT 173.68 110.49 63.19 - - 02/10/2000 166.14 -- none 2.5690.2 BELL, DERRICK 82.83 55.22 27.61 - - 02/24/2000 42.54- 33.2316.1 BELL, LILLY 106.59 82.51 24.08 - - 0411312000 11.74 - none 46.0834.1 BENNETT, GREG 82.38 58.91 23.47 - - 04/11/2000 40.00 - none 46.0836.1 BENNETT, GREG 109.67 68.28 35.57 5.82 - 03/16/2000 50.00 - none 2.3600.1 BENNETT, HOWARD 90.16 62.25 27.91 - - 0310112000 34.40 - none 21.0130.1 BESKER, GLORIA 116.07 78.20 37.87 - - 02/08/2000 45.53 - none 2.1860.1 BEVINGTON, H LARUE 91.13 49.39 41.74 -- _ 02/11/2000 96.59 - none 32.0656.1 BEVINGTON, H LARUE 131.89 82.49 49.40 - - 02/09/2000 125.86 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:29am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 1.2870.1 BIDDICK, SCOTT 21.2702.1 BIERMANN, BENJAMIN 2.0452.1 BIERY, SHAWN 22.1342.2 BISIG, JOSEPH W 4.1834.1 BITONI, MARK 2.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 4.1294.1 BLASER, GLENN 2.0446.1 BOBKO, RAYMOND 21.3290.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 21.3034.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 50.1726.1 BOESIGER, MAX 51.0506.1 BOGGIS, CONNIE 31.0512.1 BOKMAN, HELEN 34.2038.1 BOOTH, RANDY 46.0468.1 BORCHARDT, KEVIN & TINA 32.1372.2 BOYD, JAMES 5.0802.1 BOYLE, JOHN 51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI 34.0420.1 BRENEMAN, JEFFERY 2.1300.1 BRINEGAR, E.E. 4.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 33.3762.1 BROWN, DOMONIC 51.0334.1 BROWN, MATTHEW & JULIE 33.3746.1 BRUCE, DARIN & MARTINA 31.3306.1 BRYANT, JAMIE 34.1844.1 BUFFAT, STEPHEN 33.1852.1 BUNDY, DOYLE 68.0078.1 BURGETT, ARTHUR 19.0976.1 BURGUNDY HOMES 19.6510.2 BURKETT, MARK, BRYAN & CAS 74.2440.1 BURNETT, BRENDA S 69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 34.1456.1 BURROUGHS, JEFF 32.1452.1 BYRNE, JASON 50.0724.1 C.F.I. INVESTMENTS 74.0402.1 CALLAWAY, LAUREL 31.1274.1 CALLISON, JAMES & BARBARA 34.1100.1 CALLISTER, BROCK 31.3058.2 CANADA, KIMBERLY 22.1050.1 CANON, BILL & BETSY 20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA 32.0830.1 CARMONNE, JOHN G. 31.3394.1 CARROLL, PHILIP R. 50.0354.1 CARSTENSEN, DENNIS 20.0210.1 CASTLE CONSTRUCTION 32.0446.1 CAVINESS, WILLIAM A. 48.1610.1 CB FINANCIAL DEV. L.L.C. 33.2620.1 CECIL, ODETTE 22.0848.1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 74.2850.1 CHEESBROUGH, JAMES G. 2.1770.1 CHERRY LANE LAUNDROMAT 50.1774.1 CHERRY'S BUILT IN VACS 74.2532.2 CHILTON, BRYAN 34.0966.1 CHRISTIANSEN, SCOTT L 33.4344.1 CIRELLI. MARK *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Last Pmt Balance Non-Delinq 02129/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 129.93 95.89 34.04 - - 02/04/2000 131.67 - none 143.35 74.37 34.04 34.94 - 04/04/2000 50.00 - none 91.81 69.31 22.50 - - 04/11/2000 45.00 - none 112.98 71.28 41.70 - - 04/07/2000 51.00- 96.78 66.57 30.21 - - 03/15/2000 34.04 - none 90.63 52.76 37.87 - - 02111/2000 55.36 - none 143.37 56.45 86.92 - - 03/0612000 301.05 - none 97.68 65.94 31.74 - - 0311712000 31.74 - none 225.80 169.31 56.49 - - 02/11/2000 195.00- 134.99 118.56 16.43 - - 04/12/2000 46.33- 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 02/22/2000 24.08 - none 81.36 54.65 26.71 - - 04/11/2000 34.45 - none 183.28 125.71 57.57 - - 04/11/2000 50.00 - none 133.38 90.15 43.23 - - 02/23/2000 97.95 - none 103.97 68.40 35.57 - - 03/14/2000 63.48 - none 137.61 114.36 23.25 - - - 135.95 115.27 20.68 -- - 12/02/1999 72.17 _ none 202.35 170.86 31.49 - - - 149.94 71.14 78.80 _ - 03/14/2000 33.11 - none 119.43 80.03 39.40 -- - 03/31/2000 40.29 - none 228.63 119.10 60.85 48.68 - 04/19/2000 100.00 - none 81.13 53.22 27.91 - - 02/07/2000 76.07 - none 96.05 70.74 25.31 - - 03/15/2000 89.34 - none 169.97 106.84 54.72 8.41 - 03/21/2000 50.00 - none 105.34 65.94 39.40 - - 04/10/2000 27.91 - none 270.42 200.38 70.04 - - 04/10/2000 70.04 - none 84.61 57.05 27.56 - -- 03/13/2000 60.00 - none 80.04 48.16 24.08 7.80 - 03/07/2000 24.08 - none 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - - 106.52 75.60 30.92 - - 03/01/2000 80.00- 82.36 54.45 27.91 - - 02/17/2000 35.57 - none 86.04 57.36 28.68 - - 02/07/2000 92.47 - none 122.03 78.80 43.23 - - 03/28/2000 43.23 - none 90.02 65.94 24.08 - - 02/29/2000 27.91 - none 70.15 51.99 18.16 - - 03/16/2000 30.00 - none 81.05 48.16 24.08 8.81 -- 01/03/2000 74.92 - none 96.66 70.28 26.38 - - 03/15/2000 59.19 - none 96.07 68.16 27.91 - - 04/1212000 24.08 - none 110.95 79.89 31.06 - - 04/03/2000 25.00 - 113.47 79.43 34.04 - - 03114/2000 63.61 - none 59.01 48.16 10.85 - - 04/2012000 24.08 - none 174.87 127.85 47.02 - - 04/17/2000 75.00 - none 140.23 84.97 45.57 9.69 - 03116/2000 80.00 - none 102.44 73.48 28.96 - - 04/12/2000 15.00 - none 142.15 95.09 47.06 _ - 04/12/2000 31.74- 99.47 75.94 23.53 - - 03/15/2000 55.00 - none 1,316.13 969.34 346.79 - - 04/04/2000 1,482.50- 131.82 117.87 13.95 - - 03/15/2000 31.58 - none 121.01 83.14 37.87 -- - 04/10/2000 41.70 - none 102.12 71.91 30.21 - - 04/10/2000 34.04 - none 844.72 604.00 240.72 - - 04111/2000 282.85 - none 314.89 219.65 95.24 - -- 04/10/2000 102.90 - none 130.69 96.65 34.04 - - 04/04/2000 41.70- 160.44 111.44 49.00 - - 03/08/2000 60.97 - none 185.20 83.86 35.57 31.74 34.03 04/25/2000 50.00 - none l CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:30am Current Period: 0513112000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 3.0690.1 CITY RADIATOR & MUFFLER 50.0206.1 CLARK, TERRY 40.0066.1 COCHELL, TIM & ANGELIA 2.1650.1 COLLINS, TERRY 74.3304.2 COMPARATO, BRYAN 21.0022.1 CONRAD, STEVEN 5.0518.1 COOK, ROBERT 74.3816.1 CORDELL, TODD 2.1180.1 CORNISH, LAURA 31.3420.1 COUCH, JULIA 31.0886.1 COURTNEY, MARY ANNE 21.1584.2 COWGILL, STEVE 2.4770.1 COX, CHRISTI 1.2820.1 CRIDLAND, DONALD 19.6670.1 CRIST, JERRY 51.0286.1 CROW, DAN 31.3336.1 CRYER, JUDITH 51.0998.1 CULVER, WALTER 50.3734.1 CZARNECKI, CHERYL 21.1520.2 DAHM, VIRGIL 74.3536.1 DAILY, ROBERT 42.2388.2 DALY, B ERT 20.1612.1 DALY, RON 64.0002.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 4.0564.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 22.1420.1 DAVENPORT, DUANE 21.0454.1 DAWDY, CALVIN 21.3070.1 DECK, KIMBERLY 31.3584.2 DEITRICK, VIVIAN 72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STINE 1.0930.1 DENNEN, JERON & HEATHER 33.4254.1 DENNEY, BRIAN 2.1610.1 DESILET, DENICE 1.0770.1 DEUBER, THOMAS 4.1554.1 DOLL, THOMAS 74.3964.1 DONALDSON, MICHAEL 42.1200.1 DOOLEY, DAVID & LESLIE 4.1604.1 DOTY, DAVID 74.1062.1 DOTY, PAULINE & RON 51/ 4320.1 DOUBLE -D SERVICE CENTER 2.1721.1 DR. BARRY SAMS 4.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 22.1412.1 DUARTE, MARTIN 65.0428.1 DUNCAN, TERRI 42.3106.1 DUNSTAN, JOAN 31.2318.1 EAGLE, ROBERT 2.5010.1 EARLEY, GEORGE 42.2598.2 EASTBURN,GARY 21.1160.1 EASTMAN, SCOTT 74.3370.1 ECHIPARE, DOMINADOR 34.1898.1 EDINGER, REX S. 50.2302.1 ELICKER, TODD 15.0022.2 EMERALD HOMES INC 2.0180.1 ENGLISH, RONDA 31.0436.2 EVANS . KIM *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Balance Nan-Delino 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date 214.14 144.46 69.68 79.90 55.82 24.08 - 88.79 57.05 31.74 - 122.26 80.23 42.03 76.92 66.71 10.21 - 113.09 64.25 40.21 8.63 96.45 64.71 31.74 - 124.89 90.64 34.25 - 92.62 64.71 27.91 - 97.35 74.43 22.92 - 88.27 - - 10.00 97.10 62.76 26.38 7.96 177.35 116.50 60.85 - 146.62 101.09 45.53 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 90.02 62.11 27.91 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 _ 93.40 57.83 35.57 -- 92.34 64.43 27.91 - 77.30 53.22 24.08 - 122.38 84.51 37.87 - 241.86 65.48 176.38 - 79.14 52.76 26.38 - 125.23 - 17.47 16.88 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 143.14 61.65 34.04 34.04 84.96 57.05 27.91 - 120.74 78.94 41.74 .06 103.25 72.37 30.88 - 152.76 114.89 37.87 - 80.37 62.02 18.35 - 76.07 48.16 24.08 3.83 167.48 72.40 37.91 57.17 135.86 - - - 151.16 107.93 43.23 _ 93.43 65.52 24.08 3.83 95.69 61.65 34.04 - 95.29 68.91 26.38 - 83.96 57.25 26.71 - 854.09 578.33 275.76 - 10.17 - 10.00 -- 113.35 79.31 34.04 - 100.75 70.54 30.21 - 82.24 48.16 34.08 - 76.07 51.99 24.08 - 142.24 99.69 42.55 - 82.50 54.59 27.91 - 172.43 119.24 53.19 - 116.07 82.03 34.04 - 121.60 78.20 41.70 1.70 158.28 50.62 24.08 31.74 83.74 60.88 22.86 - 76.89 18.51 21.94 24.08 122.42 4.60 2.30 36.38 167.71 112.99 54.72 - - 04/11/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 05/01/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/04/2000 04/1212000 03/16/20GO 78.27 09/22/1999 - 03/16/2000 - 03/09/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 03/21/2000 - 04/1012000 - 03/28/2000 - 04/07/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02109/2000 - 02/07/2000 90.88 13.41 04/13/2000 - 03/15/2000 - 02116/2000 - 0411212000 - 04/14/2000 - 03/07/2000 - 03/24/2000 - 03/16/2000 135.86 - 02/22/2000 03/17/2000 04/1212000 - 03/15/2000 02116/2000 - 04/11/2000 .17 12/13/1999 - 03/16/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 02/10/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/10/2000 -- 04/11/2000 - 02/23/2000 - 03/14/2000 51.84 03/09/2000 - 04/17/2000 12.36 04124/2000 79.14 10/18/1999 04/10/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 69.68 none 24.08 - none 73.48 - none 45.86 - none 20.00- 300.00 0.00-300.00 - none 31.74 - none 30.00 - none 35.57 - none 80.00 - none 14.91 - none 50.00- 121.70 - none 41.70 - none 24.08 - none 31.74 - none 34.08 - none 77.90 - none 35.57 - none 24.08- 41.70 - none 206.19- 26.38 - none - none 75.00 - none 25.45 - none 140.06 -- none 4.00- 54.25 - none 60.00 - none 24.08 - none 130.58 - none - none 87.83 - none 24.08 _ none 34.04 - none 52.38 - none 49.59 - none 110.76 - none 43.62 - none 78.08 - none 37.87 - none 77.44 _ none 39.40 - none 60.00 - none 31.74 - none 97.66- 34.04 - none 50.00 - none 55.00 - none 50.00 - none 18.51 - 32.69 - none 62.38- *** 2.38- r CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:31 am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 74.2688.1 EVANS, STEVEN & KRISITE 42.4050.1 EVERMAN, BRYAN 4.1940.1 EXNER, VERNON 74.3614.1 FACKRELL, THOMAS 19.6502.1 FARNWORTH, WARREN 31.0820.1 FARR, JERRY 1.3670.1 FARRAND, SHELLIE 1.3660.1 FARRAND, SHELLIE 33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 69.2286.1 FEIK, JOSEPH 42.1840.1 FETTERS, CARMEN 4.1454.1 FIELDS, CHRYSTLE 52.0250.1 FIRST SECURITY BANK 32.1174.1 FISCHER, TRINA LEE 74.1056.1 FISHER, BEA J. 51.3990.1 FISHER, DANNY W 2.0740.1 FISK, PATRICK 51.3206.1 FLATEN, BOB 1.1160.1 FLATEN, DONALD J. 32.1298.1 FLORENCE, MICHELLE 74.3354.1 FLOREZ, BARRY 74.0340.1 FREIRE, GARY 51.3226.1 FREITAS, DANIEL 33.4258.1 FROSTROM, STEVE & TERRI 34.1176.1 FRY, LARRY 32.1542.1 FUHRMAN, JOSHUA 51.0522.1 FUHRMAN, KENT 74.1316.1 FULLER, NORMAN 21.1014.1 FUNK, DAVID 31.2250.1 GARCIA, ANOTONIO 22.0476.1 GARDNER, LAWRENCE 20.1284.2 GARDNER, VINCE 50.1198.1 GARDOSKI, WILLIAM 21.3048.2 GARLICK, LEWIS 74.3248.1 GARNER, KELLEY 33.2302.1 GARRARD, DALE 1.0450.3 GATES, TERESA 34.0780.1 GAVIN, THEODORE 33.0243.1 GEIS CONSTRUCTION 20.1826.1 GIBBS, LORIN 2.0852.2 GIESLER, ANGELA 2.2480.1 GILBERT, CARL 32.0732.1 GLASER, DELMAR 69.1703.1 GLENCO INC. 13.0022.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 15.0002.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 13.2028.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 33.0332.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 4.2160.2 GLUMM, DENNIS 49.1032.3 GOADE, JOHN 52.0266.1 GODFATHER'S PIZZA 21.0138.3 GOODRICH, GREG 50.2082.1 GORDON, MIKE & MARSHA 42.2588.1 GORDON, THOMAS 22.1228.1 GOULD, TIM *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent 0 --% 1,n r% re% Kl^ -. n.,tc.,., nn/on fesnnn n.l 1074 1onnn 97.68 65.94 31.74 - 91.04 60.88 24.08 6.08 168.67 135.12 33.55 - 100.61 66.57 34.04 100.89 70.68 30.21 - 83.59 55.58 27.91 - 111.82 76.25 35.57 - 201.55 177.47 24.08 - 106.71 74.97 31.74 - 72.24 - - - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 86.41 66.71 19.70 - 25.92 12.96 6.48 6.48 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 80.48 48.16 24.08 8.24 82.24 58.16 24.08 - 168.55 108.90 24.08 35.57 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 88.72 54.64 34.08 - 155.50 113.27 43.23 - 80.37 53.99 26.38 - 104.99 68.08 36.91 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 176.42 111.92 62.38 2.12 95.22 67.31 27.91 - 89.76 65.68 24.08 - 81 A 3 57.05 24.08 - 109.44 27.36 13.68 13.68 109.78 73.28 30.21 6.29 242.60 154.94 . 87.66 - 143.61 102.55 41.06 - 223.75 153.50 70.25 - 77.30 53.22 24.08 -- 494.00 179.15 82.34 99.15 126.38 96.26 30.12 - 81.13 53.22 27.91 -- 82.03 55.87 24.08 2.08 154.87 111.64 43.23 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 135.36 93.66 41.70 - 89.14 52.76 36.38 - 138.58 87.69 50.89 - 127.09 83.86 43.23 - 110.57 40.50 - - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 74.35 48.16 26.19 - 129.55 85.32 43.23 - 216.11 144.46 71.65 - 1,076.58 708.29 368.29 - 79.14 52.76 26.38 - 66.41 49.39 17.02 - 146.00 116.64 29.36 - 127.18 89.31 37.87 - Last Pmt 12/31/1999 Date - 04/05/2000 - 03/09/2000 - 03/09/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 03/09/2000 - 02/08/2000 - 02115/2000 - 02115/2000 - 03/29/2000 72.24 - 03101/2000 - 04/06/2000 - 01/20/2000 - 03/30/2000 - 03/02/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 03/08/2000 - 02/23/2000 - 03/29/2000 - 02/28/2000 - 02/08/2000 - 04/06/2000 - 03/13/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/22/2000 - 03/15/2000 - 03/15/2000 54.72 10/19/1999 - 02/08/2000 - 03/23/2000 04/11/2000 04/11/2000 - 04110/2000 133.36 04/11/2000 - 04/03/2000 - 04/03/2000 - 03/17/2000 - 04/10/2000 03/30/2000 02/10/2000 04/11/2000 - 04111/2000 70.07 09/24/1999 02/22/2000 - 02122/2000 02122/2000 02/24/2000 - 03/10/2000 - 02/24/2000 - 09/28/1999 - 04/05/2000 - 04/13/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 31.74 - none 60.00 - none 100.00 - none 34.04 - none 68.08 - none 84.96 - none 76.34 - none 50.76 - none 35.57 - none - none 53.36 - none 50.00 - none 6.48 - none 27.91 - none 40.00 - none 15.16 -- none 140.08 - none 24.08 - none 14.08 - none 72.65 - none 78.06 - none 35.00 - none 48.16 - none 52.00 - none 63.48 - none 51.99 - none 48.46 - none 122.07 - none 31.58 - none 106.81 - none 50.00 - none 80.00 - 27.91 - none 100.00- 35.00 - none 24.08 - none 22.00- 43.35 - none 38.72 - none 89,54- 81 .53 9.54- 81.53 - none 50.89 - none 554.95 - none 58.47- 43.23- 50.64 8.47- 43.23- 50.64 -- none 35.57- 244.06 5.57-244.06 - none 26.38- 150.00 - none 100.00 - none 37.87 - none CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:32am Current Period: 05131/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 31.3374.1 GOULDING, PAULINE 33.0102.1 GRAND AUTO 2.3250.1 GREEN, JAY 72.0212.1 GREEN, JUSTIN 32.1648.1 GREEN, ROBERT & JENNIFER 15.0055.2 GRIZZLE, BILL 2.2588.1 GROESBECK, JOHN & JANA 34.0876.1 GUINARD, MATTHEW 32.1168.1 GULBIS, ANTHONY 4.0934.1 HAFER, RUSSELL 4.1296.2 HALES, KENNETH 22.0924.1 HALL, KEVIN 19.6596.1 HAM, RUSSELL M. 33.2338.1 HAMILTON, TRACEY 46.0434.1 HAMMONS, KEVIN 42.3732.1 HANDLEY, JEREMY 74.2662.1 HANSEN, DAVID 50.2416.1 HANSEN, KORY 42. 1820.1 HARRINGTON--BLACK, JODY 19.6514.1 HARRIS, JONATHON 42.0288.1 HARTW ELL, MARK 42.2734.1 HARWARD, PAUL 31.0132.1 HASKELL, PHILLIP W. 31.3036.1 HASSIS, BENJAMIN & PAM 20.1488.1 HATCH, ORSON 21.0480.1 HAYES, LOREN 31.3470.1 HERNANDEZ, TERESO 74.0384.1 HESTER, LLYOD & SHERRY 14.5002.1 HIGH DESERT CONSTRUCTION 1.0920.1 HOFFMAN, JON C 5.0722.1 HOLLEY, DAVID 32.1456.1 HOLLINGSHEAD, BRETT 33.4346.1 HOLLOWAY, RON & PAIGE 51.4250.1 HOME PRO PLUMBING 74.1202.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 74.1146.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 31.3458.1 HOPKINS, DARRYL 51.0470.1 HOR ON, ROBERT 33.2652.9 HOWELL, KATHLEEN 34.2782.1 HULSE, TIM 50.1706.2 HUNT, STEVE 20.1894.2 HUSTON, ADDY 50.1606.1 INTEGRITY LLC 33.4146.1 JACOBS, DANIEL 50.4506.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 21.1712.1 JAMES, MELANIE 21.1912.1 JENKINS, DWIGHT 3.0012.1 JENNI, TERRY 21.2830.1 JESSEE, KEVIN 33.2718.1 JOHN, STEPHEN 51.3082.1 JOHNSON PROPERTY MGMNT 42.3060.1 JOHNSON, MATHEW 1.0220.'1 JOHNSON, MILDRED 2.1890.2 JOHNSON, STEVEN 2.0900.1 JONES FAMILY TRUST *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Last Pmt Balance Non-Delinq 02129/2000 01/31/2000 1213111999 Date Amount Msg 106.71 71.14 35.57 - - 02/0812000 110.68 - none 544.59 438.06 106.53 - - 03/22/2000 106.53 - none 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 02/07/2000 105.06 - none 122.03 82.63 39.40 - - 04/03/2000 42.63 - none 98.60 65.94 32.66 - - 03/29/2000 40.00 ,- none 144.99 103.01 41.98 - - 04/06/2000 64.90- 106.71 71.14 35.57 - - 03/0212000 74.97 - none 108.89 69.49 39.40 - - 03/15/2000 43.23 - none 132.15 92.75 39.40 -- - 04/11/2000 43.23 - none 123.35 69.31 54.04 - - 0211512000 125.90 - none 95.87 70.40 25.47 - - - 149.31 103.78 45.53 - - 04/06/2000 140.23 - none 111.01 80.80 30.21 _ - 02/08/2000 122.50 - none 169.34 116.40 52.94 - - 04/12/2000 56.50 - none 92.34 64.43 27.91 - - 04/10/2000 24.08 - none 130.78 95.21 35.57 - - 04/10/2000 50.89 - none 118.67 76.97 41.70 - - 02/29/2000 111.15 - none 123.87 89.83 34.04 - - 04/11/2000 63.88 - none 111.93 60.42 44.04 7.47 - 03/08/2000 66.08 - none 79.14 52.76 26.38 - - 04/07/2000 26.38 - none 98.01 63.97 34.04 - - 04/0312000 37.87 - none 186.06 134.42 51.64 - - 04/20/2000 120.00 - none 132.01 84.95 47.06 - - 02/14/2000 50.89 - none 118.06 82.49 35.57 - - 04/10/2000 43.23 - none 90.37 63.48 26.89 - - 04/0712000 4.85 - none 98.01 67.80 30.21 _ - 04/04/2000 30.21 - none 175.51 113.13 62.38 - - 02/17/2000 87.70 _ none 104.62 69.65 34.97 - - 04/17/2000 50.00 - none 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 02114/2000 107.13- 07.13-120.23 120.23 91.43 28.80 - - 04/07/2000 50.00 _ none 546.89 235.60 69.57 59.23 182.49 05/0212000 75.00 - none 86.19 62.11 24.08 - - 04/10/2000 31.74 - none 64.29 50.62 13.67 - - 04/11/2000 25.00 - none 227.31 122.41 103.23 1.67 - 02115/2000 101.56 - none 196.26 179.63 16.63 - - 05/01/2000 90.50 - none 1,772.09 1,393.04 379.05 - - 05/01/2000 67.52 _ none 96.68 68.54 28.14 - 04/12/2000 35.00 _ none 240.06 138.06 102.00 - - 04/12/2000 140.00 - none 105.20 83.46 21.74 - 03/15/2000 85.14 - none 119.43 76.20 43.23 - - 03/02/2000 47.06 - none 75.60 48.16 24.08 3.36 - 04/20/2000 50.00- 89.14 62.76 26.38 - - 03/28/2000 70.42- 154.48 96.32 58.16 - - 03/2812000 58.16 - none 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 02123/2000 24.08 - none 929.92 - - - 929.92 - none 75.78 59.19 16.59 - _ 04/05/2000 50.00 - none 84.96 57.05 27.91 _ - 04/10/2000 24.08 -- none 98.24 80.80 17.44 - - 0310712000 100.00 - none 111.86 71.65 40.21 - - 03/16/2000 65.59 - none 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 02103/2000 72.24 - none 81.86 57.78 24.08 - - 04119/2000 26.08 - none 98.03 61.65 36.38 - - 02/09/2000 89.40 - none 115.35 - - 34.08 81.27 11/18/1999 54.59 - none 115.62 72.39 43.23 - -- 04/13/2000 70.04- 76.08 58.16 17.92 - _ 04113/2000 30.24 - none CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:33am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $'10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 50.4614.1 JONES, LLYOD & SALLY 50.2354.1 JONES, OW EN & LARA 5.0778.1 JORGENSEN, GLEN & JANET 69.0568.1 JUDGE, ROGER & SANDRA 50.4638.1 KEENE, JAMES 2.3120 .1 KELLEY, DAVID 34.3212.1 D KERBS, AVID 21.2728.1 KESLING, SCOTT & MONICA 3.0298.1 KING, DAVID R 33.4348.1 KINGSTON, CHARLES 3.0024.1 KINNEY, KIMIKO 40.0116.1 KLINDT, PAUL 34.0452.1 KLUM, ALLAN 42.2712.1 KNAPP, JERRY B. 34.2128.1 KNIGHT, JON 74.0670.3 KNOLL, HARVEY 22.1524.2 KOCH, CARL 2.6030.1 KRASOWSKI, TOM 31.0628.1 KYSAR, AN ITA 1.0890.1 LANTZ, STAN 34.0784.1 LARA, RAFAEL 42.3000.1 LARAWAY, L. CHRISTOPHER 2.1970.1 LARSON, KERRY L 33.0108.1 LARSON, TIMOTHY 22.0332.1 LEE, MICHELLE 33.2348.1 LEGER, RHONDA 31.3354.1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 42.2278.1 LEQUERICA, CINDY 21.1480.2 LESTER, BETTS 31.3496.2 LETTICH, KENNETH 34.2852.1 LEVELL, SUZANNE 31.3382.1 LEVITT, MONTE 33,2278.1 LEWIS, RIK & CAROL 50.2130.1 LIKES, JENNIFER 20.1638.1 LINK, THOMAS 2.0448.1 LLOYD, BRADLEY 42.2520.1 LOCKYER, JEFFERY 32.0602,1 LOLLEY, JUDITH 50.2042.1 LONGSTREET, GARRET 34.0814.1 LONGWORTH, ERIC 2.4270.1 LORD, LARRY R. 2.0402.1 LUBACKY, ANDREW & DANITA 32.1320.1 LUKE, DAVID C 21 .2182.1 LUNA, JUAN S. 74.3072.1 LYTLE, CHAD & STACEY 74.2840.1 MACHO, CRAIG & TAMMY 2.4480.1 MADRID, JOSEPH F 2.5980.1 MALYUREK, VICKIE 5.0268.1 MANOS, PETER 51.0518.3 MARSHALL, C H EYAN N E 33.1850.1 MARSHALL, GARY & BOBETTE 21.1878.1 MARSTON, KELLI 42.1950.1 MARTIN, DANIEL K. 34.0994.1 MASON, DREW & VICKIE 32.0802.1 MATHIEUS, MICHAEL *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Q. I. -%.-%"Z% K['-'- M -.I;-- n1)IM Inrlf)r% n,r 17a jnr%ftn 743.57 522.85 220.72 _ 107.94 72.37 35.57 - 88.47 59.05 29.42 - 97.68 62.11 35.57 89.11 69.35 19.76 371.79 - 40.60 35.57 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 111.15 73.28 37.87 - 106.70 65.48 40.21 1.01 92.03 60.74 31.29 - 119.78 81.91 37.87 - 121.89 82.49 39.40 - 245.03 - - - 132.78 75.76 57.02 187.14 132.42 54.72 - 104.86 55.15 24.08 24.08 98.51 70.60 27.91 - 120.16 86.43 33.73 - 222.07 175.01 47.06 - 76.76 54,64 22.12 - 138.93 96.58 42.35 - 72.07 61.65 10.42 - 115.56 83.86 31.70 - 80.99 - - - 115.74 76.34 35.57 3.83 72.51 53.36 19.15 - 82.36 54.45 27.91 - 153.69 104.33 49.36 - 134.27 92.57 41.70 - 59.79 48.16 11.63 -- 94.70 60.62 34.08 - 95.43 55.22 40.21 - 133.97 88.66 45.31 - 93.99 62.25 31.74 - 195.27 134.42 60.85 -- 103.57 65.66 37.91 - 9 7.49 85.86 11.53 - 88.67 54.59 34.08 - 82.76 57.05 25.71 180.99 103.29 77.70 - 90.40 58.16 24.08 8.16 119.29 95.21 24.08 - 79.45 46.51 32.94 - 171.79 126.26 45.53 - 92.81 62.60 30.21 - 169.64 113.90 49.36 6.38 88.53 50.62 37.91 - 142.76 95.48 27.91 19.37 290.14 183.54 106.60 - 318.62 257.69 54.72 6.21 91.08 73.00 18.08 - 300.00 - - - 95.69 61.65 34.04 - 91.13 57.05 34.08 - 73.47 49.39 24.08 Last Pmt 12/31/1999 Date - 04/05/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 02/11/2000 295.62 12/1511999 - 01/12/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 02/11/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 03/15/2000 - 03/31/2000 245.03 - 04/13/2000 - 02/10/2000 1.55 - 04/13/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/1112000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/12/2000 80.99 04/20/2000 - 04/03/2000 - 04/25/2000 - 02/25/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/13/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/13/2000 - 04/1212000 - 04/10/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 04103/2000 - 02110/2000 - 12/21/1999 - 04/04/2000 - 03/17/2000 - 04106/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/07/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 03/13/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 03/07/2000 - 03/10/2000 - 03/23/2000 300.00 04/20/2000 - 04/05/2000 02/16/2000 03/07/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 805.29 - none 39.40 - none 31.00 - none 31.74 - none 100.00 - none 140.00 - none 48.16 - none 55.27 - none 100.00 - none 28.00 - none 47.92 - none 43.23 - none - none 74.89 none 199.88 - none 47.91- 60.00 - none 62.38 - none 370.00 - none 25.00 - none 50.00 - none 50.00 - none 10.00 none 35.57 _ none 24.08 - none 62.47 - none 42.23 - none 57.02- 29.22 7.02-29.22 - none 20.08 -- none 70.00 - none 35.57 - none 72.34 - none 219.34 - none 50.00 - none 115.04 - none 58.56 - none 42.89 -- none 50.00 - none 27.19 - none 24.08 - none 46.61 - none 70.42 - none 30.00 - none 88.93 - none 50.00 - none 187.02 - none 50.00 - none 57.35 _ none 30.21 - none 168.56 - none 55.82 - none CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Standard Payment Customers Current Period: 05/3112000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 2.1470.1 MAXWELL, MARGO 42.2072.1 MCCLINTICK, TODD & LEISA 74.3208.1 MCCULLOUGH, JIM 1.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 3.0382.1 MCENROE, JOHN & AGATHA 32.0230.1 MCFADDEN, LEONARD 68.0098.1 MCGILVERY, BELINDA 69.0714.1 MCGOURTY, MARY 31.3242.1 MCGOWAN, DAVID E. 74.2334.1 MCINTYRE, DUANE 21.0062.1 MCKAY, CINDY 31.0822.1 MCKAY, JOHN 31.2192.1 MCMILLAN, VICKI 33.2402.1 MCPHERSON, JO ANN 50.3726.1 MEATTE, NICKIE 20.1664.1 MEDLEY, STEVEN 50.0326.1 MEEK, JEANNE ANN 21.2754.1 MELTON, GARY 69.1249.1 MER GRNS #3 HOMEOWNERS A 69.0981.1 MERIDIAN GREENS HOMEOWNE 69.1659.1 MERIDIAN GRNS HOMEOWNER 74.3790.1 MERRITHEW, ROBERT 42.2552.1 METHNER, JACK C. 21.0094.1 METIVIER, JAMES 74.3246.1 MEYER, JOHN & LISA 4.0888.1 MICHAEL CAMPBELL CONSTRU( 4.0688.1 MICHAEL CAMPELL CONSTRUC- 19.1708.2 MICHAS, JAMES 1.3330.2 MIGNEAULT, LESLIE 3.0128.1 MILLER, GREGORY 31.0568.1 MILLER, NEIL 34.2044.1 MILLER, WILLIAM G. 46.0886.1 MINEGAR, JOHN 1.2420.1 MIRONOV, BARBARA & OLEG 34.0830.1 MIZE, JIM C 2.6470.1 MOHR, DANIEL & SUSAN 40.0202.1 MONTES, KENNETH 34.1540.1 MONTEFERRANTE, MICHELLE 74.2832.1 MOONEY, KEVIN 69.0666.1 MOORE, K. DWAYNE & LINDA 46.0222.1 MOORE, KEVIN & LISA 32.0816.1 MOORE, RICK T. 4.22.26.1 MOOREHOUSE, SEAN & DENISE 32.08041 MORGAN, CHARLES 74.2496.1 MORRIS, ROCKY 2.5630.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE 21.3296.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE & VICKI 21.2222.1 MORRISON, ROBERT & CORINNI 42.1978.1 MORSE, DAVID & SHELLEY 22.1414.1 MOSGROVE, G. THOMAS & RON 2.0526.1 MOSSI, DAVID L 34.0500.1 MOURITSEN, LAYNE 4.1804.1 MURPHY, WILLIAM 3.0670.1 MURRAY, WAYNE 51.0450.1 MURRI'S ELECTRONICS *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to he sent Last Pmt Balance Non-Delina 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12131/1999 Date 112.82 82.03 30.79 - 154.09 100.90 53.19 - 100.61 70.40 30.21 - 68.80 54.64 14.16 - 134.26 104.87 29.39 - 161.30 114.24 47.06 - 142.60 89.41 53.19 - 106.28 74.37 31.91 - 111.49 79.75 31.74 -- 109.93 81.26 28.67 - 106.71 74.97 31.74 - 127.09 83.86 43.23 - 169.55 114.87 54.68 - 145.53 91.06 54.47 - 111.77 76.20 35.57 - 125.38 84.49 40.89 - 82.24 48.16 34.08 - 113.61 75.74 37.87 - 44.76 8.10 - - 62.94 3.24 - - 77.11 11.34 - - 108.41 70.54 37.87 - 118.45 86.71 31.74 - 89.09 73.14 15.95 - 187.32 129.53 57.79 - 185.34 122.19 63.15 - 87A2 59.51 27.91 - 122.50 88.46 34.04 - 135.89 103.75 32.14 - 103.58 50.82 26.38 26.38 118.34 78.94 39.40 - 111.91 76.34 35.57 - 86.80 56.59 30.21 - 140.81 97.58 43.23 - 292.59 - - - 100.28 68.54 31.74 - 93.85 65.94 27.91 - 74.65 48.16 26.49 - 126.'11 84.63 41.48 - 82.83 56.45 26.38 - 116.23 86.20 30.03 - 142.15 98.92 43.23 - 119.43 80.03 39.40 - 212.98 91.52 43.23 54.72 127.79 89.69 38.10 - 152.80 107.65 45.15 - 134.61 95.21 39.40 - 71.52 52.76 18.76 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 207.18 150.16 57.02 - 222.70 148.83 73.87 - 109.31 85.23 24.08 - 103.35 65.48 37.87 - 116.97 81.40 35.57 - 195.12 130.08 65.04 - - 02/23/20GO - 04/10/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 0110312000 03/22/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 03/15/2000 - 04/1112000 - 03/02/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 02/0712000 - 04112/2000 - 04/20/2000 - 02/01/2000 - 04/1112000 - 02/1112000 - 02/22/2000 36.66 09/29/1999 59.70 10/19/1999 65.77 10/1911999 -- 04/11/2000 - 03/1412000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/05/2000 - 02/24/2000 - 03/30/2000 - 04/21/2000 - 01107/2000 - 02/24/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 02/03/2000 - 03/13/2000 292.59 - 02/15/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/1112000 - 02/14/2000 - 04112/2000 - 04/1212000 - 02/16/2000 23.51 04/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/11/2000 -- 04/05/2000 - 03/29/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/07/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 04112/2000 Page: 7 May 03,2000 10:33am Last Pmt Amount Msg 41.12 _ none 55.21 - none 34.04 - none 69.71- 50.00 - none 62.38 - none 41.70 - none 40.00 - none 31.74 - none 51.66 - none 28.26 - none 78.80 - none 57.87 - none 59.92 - none 116.97 - none 64.00 - none 71.63 - none 83.34 -- none 58.23 - none 60.36- 713.57 - none 37.87 - none 39.40 - none 70.00 - none 23.24 - none 59.32 - none 49.36- 60.00- 88.17 9.36- 60.00- 88.17 - none 60.89 - none 43.23 - none 52.76 - none 65.23 _ none - none 50.89 - none 35.57 - none 22.00 - none 53.00 - none 52.76 - none 30.00 - none 47.06 - none 35.57 - none 20.00 - none 100.00 - none 100.00 - none 50.89 - none 25.00 - none 24.08 - none 87.66 -- none 85.36 - none 35.29 - none 95.69 - none 43.23 - none 65.04 - none CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:34am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 32.1606.2 NASIATKA, JEFFREY 68.0086.1 NEITZEL, KENNETH & HEIDI 20.1944.1 NEWBOLD, GARY C. 1.3200.1 NEWKIRK, MARYANN 69.0152.1 NIELSON, CRAIG 22.1290.1 NIGH, MICHAEL 31.0726.1 NITZ, JASON 21.0498.1 NOLAND, SHAWN 1.3420.1 NORMAN, JEANNIE 50.1464.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 50.1456.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 65.3158.2 NOWLIN, ROBERT 2.1530.1 OBENCHAIN, JAIME 21.2744.1 ORTON, JOHN & LARAINE 50.1918.1 OSTERHOUT, JUSTIN 51.3430.1 OVERTON, DAVID C 50.3898.1 OWEN, KEVIN 21.2230.1 PAGE, LINDA 31.3280.1 PALMER, PAT 32.0638.2 PALMER, PAT 74.3044.1 PARRISH, STEVE 46.0240.1 PATTERSON, RYAN 19.6616.1 PAUL, BRIAN 51.0318.3 PAULEN, BEN 4.1240.1 PEARSON, RONALD 15.0048.2 PEBBLES-KORBER, GAIL 20.1770.2 PEGRAM, TIMOTHY 21.3160.1 PETERSEN, DOUGLAS & JENNIF 2.3732.1 PRAM, KIMAN 42.1842.1 PHILLIPS, JAMES 74.3000.1 PHILLIPS, RICHARD 34.1560.1 PHILP, HAROLD 22.1526.1 PIERCE, TANYA 42.1160.1 PIETRZAK, JOHN 2.1870.1 PIPER, LARRY 22.1564.1 PITTI, JOHN JOSEPH 19.6644.1 PLACE, WILLIAM 34.0832.1 PLETCHER, MICHAEL R 2.3340.1 POE, RICHARD 3.0332.1 PORTER, DAVID 69.0522.1 PORTER, DOUGLAS 3.0116.1 PORTER, TAD 50.2402.1 POW ELL, RANDY 34.1172.1 QUARNBERG, CARL & DOROTH' 7.0886.1 QUINN, JILL 19.0220.1 RADY, STEVE 50.2390.2 REED, LORETTA 64.4062.1 REMARKABLE HOMES INC 4.0542.2 RES, SHAWN 33.4578.1 RHINEHART, DOUG & MARY 32.1694.1 RICE, E. DONALD 1.2770.1 RIGENHAGEN, HAROLD E 42.1844.1 RIVERA, REGENA 32.0458.2 ROAM, JACQUELINE 50.2432.2 ROBERTS, BOB *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Last Pmt Balance Nan-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 84.70 *** 60.62 24.08 - - 03/15/2000 55.96- 155.20 109.67 45.53 - - 04/12/2000 45.53 - none 114.72 74.51 40.21 - - 02110/2000 162.97 - none 93.72 69.56 24.08 .08 - 04/11/2000 24.00 - none 125.95 115.27 10.68 - - 04/11/2000 53.19 - none 125.64 103.64 22.00 - - 04/17/2000 75.00 - none 118.56 48.16 24.08 24.08 22.24 03/06/2000 89.37 - none 83.73 59.65 24.08 - - 0411112000 27.91 - none 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 04/11/2000 24.08 - none 234.70 219.79 14.91 - - 0312012000 158.92 - none 633.63 413.48 220.15 - - 03/20/2000 158.72 - none 86.19 58.28 27.91 - - 02/081200-0 55.82- 126.17 102.20 23.97 - _ 04/2412000 80.00 - none 89.03 - 22.65 26.38 40.00 11/09/1999 85.76 - none 104.85 75.60 29.25 - - 04/05/2000 35.00 - none 98.44 65.94 27.91 4.59 - 03/13/2000 50.00 - none 102.92 67.03 31.74 4.15 - 04/10/2000 53.00 - none 79.14 52.76 26.38 - - 04/11/2000 26.38 - none 214.90 144.86 70.04 - - 04/1212000 62.38 - none 131.07 64.71 31.74 34.62 - 02114/2000 60.00- 113.47 79.43 34.04 - - 04/07/2000 41.51 - none 260.97 - 22.65 36.38 201.94 03/22/2000 50.00 - none 87.37 72.05 15.32 _ - 05/01/2000 26.38 - none 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 03/01/2000 24.08- 132.50 84.63 47.87 - - 02/10/2000 116.07 - none 95.85 68.54 27.31 - - 04/05/2000 40.00- 81.27 57.19 24.08 - _ 03/13/2000 35.57- 107.36 75.60 31.76 - - 04/11/2000 42.50 - none 121.73 84.63 37.10 -- - 04/10/2000 44.00 - none 88.53 50.62 37.91 - - 02/10/2000 65.76 - none 116.07 78.20 37.87 - - 02/14/2000 68.08 - none 102.46 70.72 31.74 - - 04/03/2000 39.40 - none 219.36 144.68 74.68 - - 04/06/2000 80.00 - none 102.45 70.54 31.91 - - 03/30/2000 20.00 - none 74.70 50.62 24.08 - - 03/10/2000 24.08 - none 261.31 178.48 82.83 - -- 10/26/1999 245.87 - none 91.66 61.65 30.01 - - 03/27/2000 30.41 - none 71.32 48.16 23.16 -- - 04/10/2000 25.00 - none 91.51 63.34 28.17 - - 04105/2000 40.00 - none 110.54 74.97 35.57 - - 03/07/2000 73.74 - none 84.96 57.05 27.91 - - 04/03/2000 35.57 - none 95.69 65.48 30.21 - - 0210912.000 93.23 - none 135.98 92.75 43.23 - - 0411112000 72.38 - none 162.93 112.04 50.89 - - 04/12/2000 63.66 - none 80.37 53.99 26.38 - - 04/12/2000 27.61 - none 109.17 77.43 31.74 -- - 03/14/2000 35.57 - none 158.40 96.02 62.38 - - 04/05/2000 77.70- 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 148,92 93.52 55.40 -- - 02/11/2000 138.84- 81.88 70.86 11.02 - - 04/28/2000 20.00 - none 138.44 95.21 43.23 - - 04110/2000 54.72 - none 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 04/1012000 24.08 - none 166.28 90.54 47.87 27.87 - 04/1312000 60.00 - none 78.09 67.17 10.92 - - 01/0312000 165.00- 133-44 106.38 27.06 - - 03/22/2000 100.00- 00.00- 4 CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:35am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 21.0492.1 ROBERTS, CHARLES 74.3210.1 ROBINSON, LONNIE 2.5170.1 RODRIGUEZ, JILL 2.0970.1 ROEPKER, DAVID 51.3310.1 ROGERS, MILDRED 74.3090.1 ROGERS, WAYNE & SUSAN 69.1614.1 ROHM, FRANK 50.0158.1 RON SMITH C ONSTRUCTION 50.0154.1 RON SMITH CONSTRUCTION 2.4710.1 ROSE, DEANNA 21.2006.1 ROSE, MARK & TAMARA 42.2404.1 ROSE, PHOEBE 74.2708.2 ROSS, EUGENE 69.1076.1 RUPERT, DAVID & LAURIE 2.3180.1 RYAN, WALTER 51.3198.1 RYKER, ANITA 33.2616.1 SAILORS, GREG 19.7156.1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 33.2324.2 SAUNDERS, KELLEY 69.1094.1 SCARRONE, MARIO & GWEN 22.1386.1 SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL 15.0064.1 SCHAFFNER CONSTRUCTION 32.0652.1 SCHLAPIA, SCOTT 34.2122.1 SCHMIDT, GLEN 74.3170.2 SCHNEIDERMAN, MATTHEW 42.30501 SCHOLZ, LESLIE 65.3108.1 SCOTT, DANNY 1.2260.1 SCOTT, DAVID 4.0930.1 SCOTT, TANYA 1.2040.1 SEAMONS, DOUGLAS 69.2262.1 SEDILLO, JOE 2.6440.1 SHADDICK, FREDRICK J 74.2890.1 SHAFFER, ROBERT 31.0158.1 SHARP, MARIETTA D. 21.1138.2 SHELTROWN, ROGER 74.3960.1 SHERARD, BILL 74.2758.1 SHIELDS, LAURA 42.2496.1 SIEMON, LESLIE 74.3096.1 SIGMOND, SERGIO 34.0724.2 SILCOX, BENJAMIN 22.1504.1 SIMPSON, RANDY 74.0416.1 SIMS, PATRICIA 31.3236.2 SINCLAIR, KEN 4.1914.1 SINGKHAOPET, SYLEU 21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 34.0436.1 SKELTON, RANDY 1.2290.1 SLIGER, KIM 21.1066.1 SMALLWOOD, NEIL 2.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 2.4360.1 SMITH, ANNETTE 31.0134.1 SMITH, BRADLEY 4.0532.1 SMITH, JOHN 50.0012.1 SMITH, PAUL H. 2.6170.1 SMITH, SHANE 31.3528.1 SMITH, SHAWN *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Last Pmt Balance Non-Delinq 02129/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 75.02 59.05 15.97 - - 04/11/2000 40.00 - none 90.63 60.42 30.21 - - 04112/2000 30.21 - none 129.78 89.06 40.72 - - 03/14/20GO 75.00 - none 111.24 54.31 27.91 29.02 - 04/28/2000 100.00 - none 68.64 45.76 22.88 - - 04/05/2000 22.88 - none 84.70 60.62 24.08 - - 04/05/2000 23.16 - none 100.89 70.68 30.21 - - 03/01/2000 73.28 - none 80.04 55.96 24.08 -- - .- 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - .- 132.'15 85.09 47.06 - - 02/03/2000 106.72 - none 121.91 86.34 35.57 - - 04/11/2000 43.23 - none 92.79 65.80 26.99 - - 04/10/2000 25.00 - none 192.11 118.01 70.85 3.25 - 03/29/2000 40.00- 132.50 99.95 32.55 - - 04/04/2000 70.00 - node 73.78 50.62 23.16 - - 04110/2000 25.00 - none 174.28 123.39 50.89 - - 02/03/2000 124.76 - none 128.20 96.46 31.74 - _ 04/10/2000 39.40 - none 78.53 54.45 24.08 - - 03/13/2000 17.6o- 119.31 83.74 35.57 - - 04/13/2000 47.06- 198.63 132.42 66.21 - - 02/08/2000 151.57 - none 131.34 94.75 30.21 6.38 - 03/09/2000 100.00 - none 73.47 49.39 24.08 - - - 201.62 162.22 39.40 - - 03/31/2000 70.93 -- none 111.29 81.65 27.91 1.73 - 02/16/2000 150.00 - none 86.52 61.51 25.01 - - 03/02/2000 64.39- 108.70 79.43 29.27 - - 03/08/2000 38.00 - none 96.78 66.57 30.21 - - 04/20/2000 37.87 - none 104.03 55.87 24.08 24.08 - 03/15/2000 53.90 - none 76.96 52.76 24.20 - - 04/1012000 25.00 - none 155.49 87.87 67.62 - - 03/09/2000 64.48 - none 163.48 106.42 57.06 - -- 04/11/2000 45.41 - none 138.44 99.04 39.40 - - 03/01/2000 47.06 - none 107.94 80.03 27.91 - - 02/0712000 95.22 - none 81.41 67.17 14.24 - - 04/11/2000 30.17 -- none 125.85 104.50 21.35 - -- - 143.85 105.98 37.87 - - 04/11/2000 60.85 - none 121.27 83.40 37.87 - - 04/03/2000 15.53 - none 126.33 88.46 37.87 -- - 03/10/2000 94.89 - none 109.06 85.74 23.32 - - 03/31/2000 60.00 - none 78.53 50.62 27.91 - - 02/07/2000 4.08- 24.08- 114.32 1'14.32 77.94 36.38 - - 03/16/2000 67.35 - none 78.31 55.82 22.49 - - 04/10/2000 20.00 - none 101.25 59.51 41.74 - - 02110/2000 87,56- 154.25 108.72 45.53 - - 04/13/2000 51.17 - none 114.08 91.57 22.51 - - 03/16/2000 111,07- 1'1.07- 94.32 94.32 67.94 26.38 -- - 04/11/2000 30.21 - none 88.16 67.08 21.08 - - 02/11/2000 101.93 - none 75.78 58.16 17.62 - - 04/25/2000 24.08 - none 113.14 77.57 35.57 - - 0411012000 43.21 - none 168.98 79.91 89.07 - - 03117/2000 302.88 - none 138.18 98.78 39.40 - - 04/13/2000 50.89 - none 106.96 94.20 12.76 - - 03/17/2000 40.00 - none 153.09 103.29 47.06 2.74 - 04/12/2000 50.00 - none 82.97 52.76 30.21 - - 04/10/2000 26.38 - none 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 03/02/2000 16.70 - none t CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:35am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Gust No Name 72.0266.1 SOMAZZI, ROGER 32.1576.1 SON, DAVID 21.3164.1 SOWER, MICHAEL 22.1270.1 SPARLING, ROBERT & MARTHA 2.3430.1 SPEARS, BRYCE J. 69.1374.1 SPENCER CONSTRUCTION 3.0844.1 STAMMERJOHN, JIMMY 2.1160.1 STATES, DION 51.3280.1 STENSON, VIRGINIA 50.2182.1 STERLING, TARA 2.5400.1 STEVENSON, MICHAEL 34.1800.1 STONER, JERRY 22.1380.1 STARER, GEORGE & PATRICIA 31.0878.2 STRICKLIN, PHILIP 32.1710.1 STROEBEL, SEAN 21.1058.1 STUBBLEFIELD, MARK 69.0646.1 SUDERMAN, MARK 46.0536.2 SWANSON, DAVID 31.1006.1 SWEAT, STEVEN M. 69.1278.1 T C MILLER 2.0958.1 TANAKA, TINA 50.1676.2 TAVARES, MARVIN 22.0860.2 TEATER, S USAN 20.1964.1 TECO INVESTMENTS 50.1020.1 TECO INVESTMENTS 33.0056.1 TEL -CAR INC. 2.1190.1 TERRELL, A 2.1930.1 TERRY, TIMOTHY 74.1114.1 THATCHER, TIMOTHY 2.0952.1 THOMAS, TIMOTHY 32.1558.2 THOMPSON, GARY 34.1550.1 THOMPSON, HARRY 1.1940.1 THORNE, TORY L 21.2732.1 THURBER, RON 35.5048.1 TIM AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 69.0226.1 TIMA, KAREN 42.2544.2 TINTSMAN,TODD 46.0210.1 TODD, JEFF 2.2200.3 TODD, RICK 40.0250.1 TOMICH, LONNY 74.2464.1 TOWN, NEAL 4.0928.1 TREES, ROY 31.2254.1 TURNER, RAYMOND 34.2104.1 TYLER, HEIDI 31.3406.1 ULIN, MARY H. 5.0456.1 UPTON, CHAD 74.2876.1 USS ERY, TRACY 69.1192.1 USTICK, JOHN & KATHRYN 22.0178.1 VALDEZ, ADALFO 19.0120.2 VANLEUVEN, MATTHEW 21.2946.1 VARNER, GERALD & SHAWNA 2.0466.1 VICK, WILLIAM & KELLY 2.4550.1 VINCENT, TOMMY 7.1052.1 VINEGARD, JAMES 42.0324.1 VINES. MARK *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Balance Nan-Delina 02/29/2000 01131/2000 12/31/1999 Date 98.29 64.25 34.04 - 66.32 48.16 18.16 - 77.60 66.71 10.89 - 682.81 66.85 18.62 37.91 130.66 91.26 39.40 -- 109.14 85.06 24.08 - 76.90 52.76 24.14 -- 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 305.59 137.60 77.70 66.21 135.98 92.75 43.23 - 96.45 64.71 31.74 - 106.71 71.14 35.57 - 370.57 - - - 89.82 65.94 23.88 - 337.50 - - 10.00 156.85 101.32 55.53 - 113.05 79.01 34.04 - 79.13 48.16 30.97 - 90.63 60.42 30.21 - 127.55 80.83 42.20 4.52 103.64 65.82 37.82 - 110.42 62.76 26.38 21.28 151.00 39.80 19.90 36.38 79.14 52.76 26.38 - 148.41 70.88 77.53 - 320.11 170.00 150.11 - 107.34 82.37 24.97 - 144.78 - - 132.15 88.92 43.23 - 97.82 69.91 27.91 - 116.83 81.26 35.57 - 10.00 - 10.00 - 276.39 214.26 62.13 - 248.88 176.97 30.21 41.70 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 170.24 92.29 77.95 - 100.00 68.26 31.74 - 96.92 66.71 30.21 - 82.24 58.16 24.08 - 109.05 67.31 41.74 - 172.29 115.27 57.02 -- 77.64 53.99 23.65 - 248.28 - - - 124.37 84.97 39.40 -- 92.62 64.71 27.91 - 554.14 - - 36.38 174.89 117.87 57.02 - 137.68 92.15 45.53 - 104.44 70.40 34.04 - 58.95 48.16 10.79 - 135.77 121.70 14.07 - 111.77 76.20 35.57 - 116.70 57.05 27.91 31.74 89.14 62.76 26.38 - 123.45 85.58 37.87 - - 04/04/2000 02/25/2000 - 04/11/2000 559.43 10/21/1999 - 04/05/2000 - 02/17/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/08/2000 24.08 - 02/07/20GO 04/11/2000 - 02/08/2000 370.57 - 03/14/2000 327.50 08/18/1999 - 03/07/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 02/22/2000 - 02111/2000 -- 04/13/2000 - 04110/2000 54.92 11/16/1999 - 04/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/13/2000 144.78 10/01/1999 - 04/10/2000 - 02/01/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 02/22/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 0111112000 04/24/2000 - 03/06/2000 - 04/05/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 03/21/2000 - 03/15/2000 248.28 - 04/12/2000 - 04/07/2000 517.76 09/15/1999 - 04/12/2000 03/29/2000 02/25/2000 - 03/28/2000 - 04/18/2000 - 03/10/2000 - 03/16/2000 -- 02/24/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 14.25 - none 30.00 - none 40.00 -- none 201.00 - none 40.2.2 - none 24.08- 25.00 - none 82.64 - none - none 54.72 - none 35.57 - none 106.85 - none - none 50.00- 171 .09 0.00- 171.09 - none 41.45 - none 41.70 - none 3.11- 63.02 - none 43.00 - none 3.00 - none 3.42- 26.38 - none 24.25 - none 134.90 - none 50.00 - none 82.59 - none 35.57 - none 49.06 - none 43.23- 86.22 - none 81.28 - none 169.35 - none 55.00 - none 39.40- 39.65 - none 24.08- 21.59 - none 60.85 - none 38.00 - none - none 33.42 - none 35.57 - none 262.50 - none 68.51 - none 53.19 - none 75.74 - none 100.00 - none 47.06 - none 30.51 - none 52.76 - none 78.34 - none t CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Standard Payment Customers Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 21.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 31.0608.1 WALKER, MICHAEL 1.3340.1 WALSH, RON 4.2132.1 WALSTON, DOUGLAS 21.2240.1 WARD, MIKE 22.1156.2 WARE, JAIMEE 20.1846.1 WARE, MICKEY L. 74.2330.1 WASSON, LEE & KARI 21.2714.1 WATERMAN, LORI 3.0100.1 WEATHERMON, TINA 2.6080.1 W EBB, GERALD 21.1968.2 WELDIN, TAMRA 69.2298.1 WESEMAN, DIANE 74.2638.1 WEST, LARRY 34.3266.1 WESTERN FINANCIAL SERVICE; 2.1370.1 WHITE, DEBRA LYNN 32.0846.1 WHITE, LUCILLE 5.0792,1 WICK, DON 52.0262.1 WILD SHAMROCK LLP 69.1304.1 WILDE, KENNETH 2.2040.1 WILLIAMS, FRED 74.0356.1 WILSON, DEANA 3.0004.1 WILSON, JAN 34.1954.1 WINGATE, DIANE 7.0880.2 W INKLER, GREG 3.0052.2 W INN, MARY 4.2054.1 WINTER, JEFFREY & PAIGE 50.4490.3 WINTERS, BRIAN 1.2010.1 WISDOM, RICK S 31.3230.1 W ITT, STEPHEN M. 20.1272.1 WOLFE, TAMI 32.1560.1 WOOD, ADRON 22.1492.1 WOODINGTON, PATRICK 74.3308.1 WOODLAND, WAIDE T 31.3344.1 WOODRUFF, NOEL R 22.1622.1 WRIGHT, DARRIN 19.6500.1 WRIGHT, SHEILA 74.3348.2 YEATTS, PAMELA 2.0670.1 YOUNG, AUSTIN L 50.3740.1 YOUNG, DARON 31.3248.2 YOUNG, DENNIS 7.0960.1 YOUNG, LESLIE 2.0350.1 ZIEGLER, WILLIAM 33.3570.1 ZOELLER, KATHRYN Grand Totals: Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No = {<) 9900000 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent 150.84 141.33 165.69 80.37 174.89 80.81 105.95 132.50 129.99 103.35 79.14 79.14 131.53 74.54 92.90 84.37 75.93 168.60 944.35 221.41 157.34 110.46 79.14 107.18 108.67 41.68 118.41 90.91 102.65 62.92 124.31 33.76 170.83 139.05 16'1.99 86.80 139.05 85,43 286.57 75.93 106.45 99.10 300.51 a -7n �-7 Page: 11 May 03,2000 10:36am Last Pmt Amount Msg 50.00 - none 100.00 - none 191.33 - none 26.38 - none 68.51 - none 34.15- 37.87 - none 45.53 - none 40.00 - none 31.58 - none 26.38 - none 89.54- 57.02 - none 24.64 - none 85.31 - none 40.00 none 27.91 - none 68.51 - none 670.70 - none 68.10 - none 106.58 - none 80.00 - none 26.38 - none 37.87 - none 20-64- 24.00 0.64-24.00 _ none 65.00- 27.91 - none 24.08 - none 30.00 - none - none 40.85 - none 49.36 - none 50.00 - none 37.87 -- none 53.19 - none 40.84- 100.00 - none 24.08 - none 41.74- 34.04 - none 50.00 - none 55.08 - none Last Pmt Nan-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 1213111999 Date 75.74 37.87 37.23 - 03/0712000 100.15 41.18 - - 03/1512000 - - - 165.69 10/15/1999 53.99 26.38 - - 04/06/2000 117.87 57.02 - - 04/10/2000 65.48 15.33 - - 04/11/2000 71.91 34.04 - - 04/11/2000 94.63 37.87 - - 04/12/2000 89.69 40.30 - - 03/2312000 69.31 34.04 - - 04/10/2000 52.76 26.38 - - 02/24/2000 52.76 26.38 - - 02/08/2000 89.83 41.70 - - 04/11/2000 48.16 24.64 1.74 - 04/04/2000 71.00 21.90 - - 0510112000 69.91 14.46 - - 03/21/2000 51.85 24.08 - - 02/28/2000 115.41 53.19 - - 04/12/2000 635.95 308.40 - - 02128/2000 107.19 45.53 64,68 4.01 03/31/2000 82.37 31.74 43.23 - 03/16/2000 97.83 12.63 - - 04/12/2000 52.76 26.38 - - 04/10/2000 73.14 34.04 - - 04/11/2000 49.39 59.28 _ - 02108/2000 26.38 15.30 - - 99.18 19.23 - - 03/3012000 64.57 26.34 - - 03/30/2000 70.91 31.74 - - 02/22/2000 50.62 12.30 - - 04/20/2000 102.55 21.76 - - 04/28/2000 - - 19.32 14.44 150.83 20.00 - _ 03/20/2000 97.35 41.70 - - 03/06/2000 103.18 51.66 7.15 - 04/12/2000 60.42 26.38 - - 04/14/2000 97.35 41.70 - - 03/08/2000 55.22 30.21 - - 02108/2000 91.52 24.08 80.04 90.93 02122/2000 51.85 24.08 - - 04/06/2000 74.71 31.74 - - 04/13/2000 68.89 30.21 - - 04/04/2000 147.41 153.10 - - 04/07/2000 48.16 24.08 24.08 73.95 04/13/2000 Page: 11 May 03,2000 10:36am Last Pmt Amount Msg 50.00 - none 100.00 - none 191.33 - none 26.38 - none 68.51 - none 34.15- 37.87 - none 45.53 - none 40.00 - none 31.58 - none 26.38 - none 89.54- 57.02 - none 24.64 - none 85.31 - none 40.00 none 27.91 - none 68.51 - none 670.70 - none 68.10 - none 106.58 - none 80.00 - none 26.38 - none 37.87 - none 20-64- 24.00 0.64-24.00 _ none 65.00- 27.91 - none 24.08 - none 30.00 - none - none 40.85 - none 49.36 - none 50.00 - none 37.87 -- none 53.19 - none 40.84- 100.00 - none 24.08 - none 41.74- 34.04 - none 50.00 - none 55.08 - none MAY - 3 2000 DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR 05/17/00 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, May 16, 2000, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on May 17, 2000, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (No response.) MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list i s $3 1, 187.19. *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent i CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:28am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criteria: Tenrninated customers not included Customer.Cust No 9900000 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Nan-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 1213111999 Date Amount Msg 1.1360.1 AKERS, GENEVA 289.51 205.32 84.19 - - 02/11/2000 176.04 - none 2.4740.1 ALBRECHT, JUDY 83.59 55.68 27.91 - - 03/08/2000 47.95 - none 21.0184.1 ALLEN, ROBERT 114.56 80.52 34.04 - - 02/17/2000 34.04 - none 31.3422.1 ALLEN, TIM 114.84 76.97 37.87 - - 02/2212000 90.53 - none 20.1510.1 ALLRED, JAY D. 113.61 79.57 34.04 - - 04/05/2000 43.40 - none 34.2730.1 ALVEREZ, ROSALIO 90.32 58.28 31.74 .30 - 02128/2000 50.00 - none 51.0050.1 AMYX FAMILY LIMITED 558.31 - - - 558.31 - none 21.1784.1 ANDERSEN, SHARRON 95.97 53.99 26.38 15.60 - 04119/2000 60.00 - none 2.0888.1 ANDERSON, DEAN 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 04/06/2000 24.08 - none 2.0860.1 ANDERSON, DEAN 106.57 82.49 24.08 - - 04/10/2000 40.28 - none 33.3572.1 ANDERSON, KATHY 107.44 95.45 11,99 - - 03/17/2000 40.00 - none 2.6300.1 ANSON, PATRICIA 126.26 83.72 42.54 - - 03/27/2000 40.00 - none 68.0070.1 ARES, TONY 166.52 83.12 37.87 45.53 - 04/10/2000 40.00 - none 2.2110.1 ARMAS, SAMUEL 197.53 136.11 61.42 - - 04/10/2000 71.00 - none 22.2296.1 ARMENTROUT, GARY 102.12 71.91 30.21 - - 02/16/2000 37.01 - none 21.1708.1 ARTS, MICHELLE & RICK 138.46 98.86 39.60 - - 03/29/2000 51.46 - none 65.0658.1 ASHLEY, SHON 101.51 65.94 35.57 - - 03/06/2000 35.57 - none 21.2212.1 ASMUSEN, RICH & MELISSA 149.31 103.78 45.53 - - 03/31/2000 64.68 - none 21.1930.2 BAILEY, BRUCE 716.79 584.37 47.06 85.36 - - 21.2736.1 BAILEY, MICHELLE 224.48 144.37 37.87 42.24 - 04/21/2000 104.00 - none 2.3550.2 BAILEY, PEGGY 60.60 48.16 12.44 - - 04/05/2400 50.00- 22.1220.1 BAILEY, THOMAS 144.39 87.37 57.02 - - 02/23/2000 53.19 - none 3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 191.49 134.47 57.02 - - 02/24/2000 112.81 - none 50.4270.1 BAKER, STEVEN 187.30 103.43 83.87 - - 04/07/2000 81.53 - none 21.0052.1 BALDWIN, ROBERT 81.74 55.36 26.38 - - 0311012000 78.08 - none 69.0138.1 BANG, JAMES & PEGGY SUE 119.90 78.20 41.70 - - 03/27/2000 37.87 - none 69.0590.1 BAPTISTE, MONTGOMERY 201.17 148.62 52.55 - - 04/10/2000 50.00 - none 69.0484.2 BARBER, CURTIS 111.91 97.35 14.56 - - - 33.1862.1 BARKER, JOHN 194.21 122.30 71.91 - - 03/17/2000 72.00 - none 46.0106.1 BARNES, DAVID 100.61 70.40 30.21 - - 03/09/2000 34.04 - none 4.1430.1 BARNEY, MARY R 94.46 64.25 30.21 - - 04/10/2000 30.21 - none 21.0464.1 BARR, J ERROD F 68.08 56.45 11.63 - - 03/15/2000 79.00 - none 74.2822.1 BARR, KENNETH 237.40 157.40 80.00 - - 03/01/2000 243.16 - none 42.1966.1 BARRY, CLAY A 153.14 92.29 60.85 - - 02/25/2000 49.36 - none 31.3060.1 BASTIAN, DAVID 259.40 86.32 39.40 43.23 90.45 03/03/2000 50.00 - none 2.0360.1 BEACH, DEVIN 90.34 69.77 20.57 - - 03/28/2000 55.00 - none 31.3042.1 BEAN, ALAN & JENNY 208.33 149.78 58.55 - - 04/12/2000 70.04 - none 1.0030.1 BEAUDOIN, JOHN R 78.46 54.64 23.82 - - 04/11/2000 42.00 - none 34.0942.1 BECK, JIM 114.48 90.40 24.08 -- - 04/04/2000 66.21 - none 32.0950.1 BECKER, NICHOLAS 103.09 72.88 30.21 - - 03/16/2000 72.05 - none 32.0872.1 BECKER, ROGER F. 128.32 88.92 39.40 - - 02/1412000 95.49 -- none 46.0448.1 BEERY, LON 108.08 74.85 33.23 - - 04/13/2000 20.57 - none 31.1004.1 BEHNER, ROBERT 173.68 110.49 63.19 - - 02/10/2000 166.14 - none 2.5690.2 BELL, DERRICK 82.83 55.22 27.61 - - 02/2412000 42,54- 33.2316.1 BELL, LILLY 105.59 82.51 24.08 - - 04/13/2000 11.74 _ none 46.0834.1 BENNETT, GREG 82.38 58.91 23.47 - - 04/11/2000 40.00 - none 46.0836.1 BENNETT, GREG 109.67 68.28 35.57 5.82 - 03/16/2000 50.00 - none 2.3600.1 BENNETT, HOWARD 90.16 62.25 27.91 - - 03/0112000 34.40 - none 21.0130.1 BESKER, GLORIA 116.07 78.20 37.87 -- - 02/08/2000 45.53 - none 2.1860.1 BEVINGTON, H LARUE 91.13 49.39 41.74 - - 02/11/2000 96.59 - none 32.0656.1 BEVINGTON, H LARUE 131.89 82.49 49.40 - - 02/09/2000 125.86 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN a Delinquent Account List- council Standard Payment Customers Current Period: 0513112000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Page: 2 May 03,2000 10:29am Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02129/2000 01/31/2000 1213111999 Date Amount Msg 1.2870.1 BIDDICK, SCOTT 129.93 95.89 34.04 - - 02/04/2000 131.67 - none 21.2702.1 BIERMANN, BENJAMIN 143.35 74.37 34.04 34.94 - 04/04/2000 50.00 - none 2.0452.1 B I ERY, SHAWN 91.81 69.31 22.50 _ - 04/1112000 45.00 - none 22.1342.2 BISIG, JOSEPH W 112.98 71.28 41.70 - - 04/07/2000 51.00- 4.1834.1 BITON I, MARK 96.78 66.57 30.21 - - 03/15/2000 34.04 - none 2.4200.1 BLAKELY, CLAUDE JAMES 90.63 52.76 37.87 - - 02/1112000 55.36 - none 4.1294.1 BLASER, GLENN 143.37 56.45 86.92 - - 03/06/2000 301.05 _ none 2.0446.1 BOBKO, RAYMOND 97.68 65.94 31.74 - - 03/17/2000 31.74 - none 21.3290.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 225.80 169.31 56.49 - - 02/1112000 195.00- 21.3034.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 134.99 118.56 16.43 - - 04/12/2000 46.33- 50.1726.1 BOESIGER, MAX 72.24 48.16 24.08 - _ 02/2212000 24.08 - none 51.0506.1 BOGGIS, CONNIE 81.36 54.65 26.71 - - 0411112000 34.45 - none 31.0512.1 BOKMAN, HELEN 183.28 125.71 57.57 - - 04/1112000 50.00 - none 34.2038.1 BOOTH, RANDY 133.38 90.15 43.23 - - 02123/2000 97.95 _ none 46.0468.1 BORCHARDT, KEVIN & TINA 103.97 68.40 35.57 - - 0311412000 63.48 - none 32.1372.2 BOYD, ,FAMES 137.61 114.36 23.25 - - - 5.0802.1 BOYLE, JOHN 135.95 115.27 20.68 - -- 12102/1999 72.17 - none 51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI 202.35 170.86 31.49 - - - 34.0420.1 BRENEMAN, JEFFERY 149.94 71.14 78.80 - - 0311412000 33.11 - none 2.1300.1 BRINEGAR, E.E. 119.43 80.03 39.40 _ - 03/31/2000 40.29 - none 4.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 228.63 119.10 60.85 48.68 - 04/19/2000 100.00 - none 33.3762.1 BROWN, DOMONIC 81.13 53.22 27.91 - - 02/07/2000 76.07 - none 51.0334.1 BROWN, MATTHEW & JULIE 96.05 70.74 25.31 - - 03/15/2000 89.34 _ none 33.3746.1 BRUCE, DARIN & MARTINA 169.97 106.84 54.72 8.41 - 03/21/2000 50.00 - none 31.3306.1 BRYANT, JAMIE 105.34 65.94 39.40 - - 04/10/2000 27.91 - none 34.1844.1 BUFFAT, STEPHEN 270.42 200.38 70.04 _ - 04/10/2000 70.04 - none 33. 1852.1 BUNDY, DOYLE 84.61 57.05 27.56 - - 03/13/2000 60.00 - none 68.0078.1 BURGETT, ARTHUR 80.04 48.16 24.08 7.80 - 03/07/2000 24.08 - none 19.0976.1 BURGUNDY HOMES 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - - 19.6510.2 BURKETT, MARK, BRYAN & CAS: 106.52 75.60 30.92 - - 03/0112000 80.00 - 74.2440A BURNETT, BRENDA S 82.36 54.45 27.91 - - 02/17/2000 35.57 - none 69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 86.04 57.36 28.68 - - 02/07/2000 92.47 - none 34.1456.1 BURROUGHS, JEFF 122.03 78.80 43.23 - _ 03/28/2000 43.23 - none 32.1452.1 BYRN E, JASON 90.02 65.94 24.08 - - 02/29/2000 27.91 - none 50.0724.1 C.F.I. INVESTMENTS 70.15 51.99 18.16 - - 03/16/2000 30.00 - none 74.0402.1 CALLAWAY, LAUREL 81.05 48.16 24.08 8.81 - 01/03/2000 74.92 - none 31.1274.1 CALLISON, JAMES & BARBARA 96.66 70.28 26.38 - - 03/15/2000 59.19 - none 34.1100.1 CALLISTER, BROCK 96.07 68.16 27.91 -- - 04/1212000 24.08 - none 31.3058.2 CANADA, KIMBERLY 110.95 79.89 31.06 - - 04/03/2000 25.00- 22.1050.1 CANON, BILL & BETSY 113.47 79.43 34.04 - - 03/14/2000 63.61 - none 20.1634.1 CARLSON, PATRICIA 59.01 48.16 10.85 - - 04/20/2000 24.08 - none 32.0830.1 CARMONNE, JOHN G. 174.87 127.85 47.02 - - 04/17/2000 75.00 - none 31.3394.1 CARROLL, PHILIP R. 140.23 84.97 45.57 9.69 - 03/16/2000 80.00 - none 50.0354.1 CARSTENSEN, DENNIS 102.44 73.48 28.96 - -- 04/1212000 15.00 - none 20.0210.1 CASTLE CONSTRUCTION 142.15 95.09 47.06 - _ 04/12/2000 31.74- 32.0446.1 CAVINESS, WILLIAM A. 99.47 75.94 23.53 - - 03/15/2000 55.00 - none 48.1610.1 CB FINANCIAL DEV. L.L.C. 1,316.13 969.34 346.79 - -- 04/04/2000 1,482.50- 33.2620.1 CECIL, ODETTE 131.82 117.87 13.95 - _ 0311512000 31.58 - none 22.0848.1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 121.01 83.14 37.87 - - 04/10/2000 41.70 - none 74.2850.1 CHEESBROUGH, JAMES G. 102.12 71.91 30.21 - - 04110/2000 34.04 - none 2.1770.1 CHERRY LANE LAUNDROMAT 844.72 604.00 240.72 - - 0411112000 282.85 - none 50. 1774.1 CHERRY'S B U 1 LT IN VACS 314.89 219.65 95.24 - - 04/10/2000 102.90 - none 74.2532.2 CHILTON, BRYAN 130.69 96.65 34.04 - - 04/04/2000 41.70- 34.0966.1 CHRISTIANSEN, SCOTT L 160.44 111.44 49.00 - - 03/08/2000 60.97 - none 33.4344.1 CIRELLI, MARK 185.20 83.86 35.57 31.74 34.03 04/25/2000 50.00 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent t 5 CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:30am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $"10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 3.0690.1 CITY RADIATOR & MUFFLER 50.0206.1 CLARK, TERRY 40.0066.1 COCHELL, TIM & ANGELIA 2.1650.1 COLLINS, TERRY 74.3304.2 COMPARATO, BRYAN 21.0022.1 CONRAD, STEVEN 5.0518.1 COOK, ROB ERT 74.3816.1 CORDELL, TODD 2.1180.1 CORNISH, LAURA 31.3420.1 COUCH, JULIA 31.0886.1 COURTNEY, MARY ANNE 21.1584.2 COWGILL, STEVE 2.4770.1 COX, CHRISTI 1.2820.1 CRIDLAND, DONALD 19.6670.1 CRIST, JERRY 51.0286.1 CROW, DAN 31.3336.1 CRYER, JUDITH 51.0998.1 CULVER, WALTER 50.3734.1 CZARNECKI, CHERYL 21.1520.2 DAHM, VIRGIL 74.3536.1 DAILY, ROBERT 42.2388.2 DALY, BERT 20.1612.1 DALY, RON 64.0002.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 4.0564.1 DARRELL WILSON CONSTRUCT 22.1420.1 DAVENPORT, DUANE 21.0454.1 DAWDY, CALVIN 21.3070.1 DECK, KIMBERLY 31 .3584.2 DEITRICK, VIVIAN 72.0132.1 DEL BRADLEY STINE 1.0930.1 DENNEN, JERON & HEATHER 33.4254.1 DENNEY, BRIAN 2.1690.1 DESILET, DENICE 1.0770.1 DEUBER, THOMAS 4.1554.1 DOLL, THOMAS 74.3964.1 DONALDSON, MICHAEL 42.1200.1 DOOLEY, DAVID & LESLIE 4.1604.1 DOTY, DAVID 74.1062.1 DOTY, PAULINE & RON 51.4320.1 DOUBLE -D SERVICE CENTER 2.1721.1 DR. BARRY SAMS 4.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 22.'1412.1 DUARTE, MARTIN 65.0428.1 DUNCAN, TERRI 42.3106.1 DUNSTAN, JOAN 31.2318.1 EAGLE, ROBERT 2.5010.1 EARLEY, GEORGE 42.2598.2 EASTBURN,GARY 21.1160.1 EASTMAN, SCOTT 74.3370.1 ECHIPARE, DOMINADOR 34.1898.1 EDINGER, REX S- 50.2302.1 ELICKER, TODD 15.0022.2 EMERALD HOMES INC 2.0180.1 ENGLISH, RONDA 31.0436.2 EVANS, KIM *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Balance Non-Delin❑ 02129/2000 01/31/2000 12131/1999 Date 214.14 144.46 69.68 - 79.90 55.82 24.08 - 88.79 57.05 31.74 - 122.26 80.23 42.03 76.92 66.71 10.21 - 113.09 64.25 40.21 8.63 96.45 64.71 31.74 - 124.89 90.64 34.25 - 92.62 64.71 27.91 - 97.35 74.43 22.92 - 88.27 - - 10.00 97.10 62.76 26.38 7.96 177.35 116.50 60.85 - 146.62 101.09 45.53 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 90.02 62.11 27.91 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 93.40 57.83 35.57 - 92.34 64.43 27.91 - 77.30 53.22 24.08 - 122.38 84.51 37.87 - 241.86 65.48 176.38 - 79.14 52.76 26.38 - 125.23 - 17.47 16.88 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 143.14 61.65 34.04 34.04 84.96 57.05 27.91 - 120.74 78.94 41.74 .06 103.25 72.37 30.88 - 152.76 114.89 37.87 - 80.37 62.02 18.35 - 76.07 48.16 24.08 3.83 167.48 72.40 37.91 57.17 135.86 - - - 151.16 107.93 43.23 - 93.43 65.52 24.08 3.83 95.69 61.65 34.04 - 95.29 68.91 26.38 - 83.96 57.25 26.71 - 854.09 578.33 275.76 - 10.17 - 10.00 - 113.35 79.31 34.04 - 100.75 70.54 30.21 - 82.24 48.16 34.08 - 76.07 51.99 24.08 - 142.24 99.69 42.55 - 82.50 54.59 27.91 - 172.43 119.24 53.19 _ 116.07 82.03 34.04 - 121.60 78.20 41.70 1.70 158.28 50.62 24.08 31.74 83.74 60.88 22.86 - 76.89 18.51 21.94 24.08 122.42 4.60 2.30 36.38 167.71 112.99 54.72 _ - 04/11/2000 - 04110/2000 - 03101/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 05/01/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 04/10/2000 04/04/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 03/16/2000 78.27 09/22/1999 - 03/16/2000 - 03/09/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 03121/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 03/28/2000 - 04/07/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/09/2000 - 02/07/2000 90.88 13.41 04/13/2000 - 03/15/2000 - 02/16/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/14/2000 - 03/07/2000 - 03/24/2000 - 03/16/2000 135.86 - 02/22/2000 - 03/17/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 03/15/2000 - 02116/2000 - 04/1112000 .17 12113/1999 - 03/16/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 02/10/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/10/2000 -- 04/11/2000 - 02/23/2000 - 03/14/2000 51.84 03/09/2000 - 04/17/2000 12.36 04/2412000 79.14 10/18/1999 - 04/10/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 69.68 - none 24.08 - none 73.48 - none 45.86 - none 20.00 - 300.00 - none 31.74 - none 30.00 - none 35.57 - none 80.00 - none 14.91 - none 50.00- 121.70 - none 41.70 - none 24.08 - none 31.74 - none 34.08 - none 77.90 - none 35.57 - none 24.08- 41.70 - none 206.19- 26.38 - none - none 75.00 - none 25.45 - none 140.06 - none 4.00- 54.25 .00-54.25 - none 60.00 - none 24.08 - none 130.58 - none - none 87.83 - none 24.08 - none 34.04 - none 52.38 - none 49.59 - none 110.76 - none 43.62 - none 78.08 - none 37.87 - none 77.44 - none 39.40 - none 60.00 - none 31.74 - none 97.66- 34.04 - none 50.00 - none 55.00 - none 50.00 - none 18.51- 32.69 - none 62.38- *** 2.38- *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:31 am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-De€inq 02129/2000 0113112000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 74.2688.1 EVANS, STEVEN & KRISITE 97.68 65.94 31.74 - - 04/05/2000 31.74 - none 42.4050.1 EVERMAN, BRYAN 91.04 60.88 24.08 6.08 - 03/0912000 60.00 - none 4.1940.1 EXNER, VERNON 168.67 135.12 33.55 - - 03/09/2000 100.00 - none 74.3614.1 FACKRELL, THOMAS 100.61 66.57 34.04 - - 04/10/2000 34.04 - none 19.6502.1 FARNWORTH, WARREN 100.89 70.68 30.21 - - 03/09/2000 68.08 - none 31.0820.1 FARR, JERRY 83.59 55.68 27.91 - - 02/08/2000 84.96 - none 1.3670.1 FARRAND, SHELLIE 111.82 76.25 35.57 - - 02/15/2000 76.34 - none 1.3660.1 FARRAND, SHELLIE 201.55 177.47 24.08 - - 02115/2000 50.76 - none 33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 106.71 74.97 31.74 - - 03/29/2000 35.57 - none 69.2286.1 FEIK, JOSEPH 72.24 - - - 72.24 - none 42.1840.1 FETTERS, CARMEN 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 03/01/2000 53.36 - none 4.1454.1 FIELDS, CHRYSTLE 86.41 66.71 19.70 - - 04/06/2000 50.00 - none 52.0250.1 FIRST SECURITY BANK 25.92 12.96 6.48 6.48 - 01/20/2000 6.48 - none 32.1174.1 F€SCHER, TRINA LEE 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 03/30/2000 27.91 - none 74.1056.1 FISHER, BEA J. 80.48 48.16 24.08 8.24 - 03/02/2000 40.00 - none 51.3990.1 FISHER, DANNY W 82.24 58.16 24.08 - - 04/11/2000 15.16 - none 2.0740.1 FISK, PATRICK 168.55 108.90 24.08 35.57 - 03/08/2000 140.08 - none 51.3206.1 FLATEN, BOB 72.24 48.16 24.08 -- - 02/23/2000 24.08 - none 1.1160.1 FLATEN, DONALD J. 88.72 54.64 34.08 _ - 03/29/2000 14.08 - none 32.1298.1 FLORENCE, MICHELLE 156.50 113.27 43.23 - - 02/28/2000 72.65 - none 74.3354.1 FLOREZ, BARRY 80.37 53.99 26.38 - - 02/08/2000 78.06 - none 74.0340.1 FREIRE, GARY 104.99 68.08 36.91 -- - 04/06/2000 35.00 - none 51.3226.1 FREITAS, DANIEL 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 03/13/2000 48.16 - none 33.4258.1 FROSTROM, STEVE & TERRI 176.42 111.92 62.38 2.12 - 04/12/2000 52.00 - none 34.1 176.1 FRY, LARRY 95.22 67.31 27.91 - - 02122/2000 63.48 - none 32.1542.1 FUHRMAN, JOSHUA 89.76 65.68 24.08 - - 03/15/2000 51.99 - none 51.0522.1 FUHRMAN, KENT 81.13 57.05 24.08 - - 03/15/2000 48.46 - none 74.1316.1 FULLER, NORMAN 109.44 27.36 13.68 13.68 54.72 10/19/1999 122.07 - none 21.1014.1 FUNK, DAVID 109.78 73.28 30.21 6.29 - 02/08/2000 31.58 - none 31.2250.1 GARCIA, ANOTONIO 242.60 154.94 87.66 - - 03/23/2000 106.81 - none 22.0476.1 GARDNER, LAWRENCE 143,61 102.55 41.06 - - 04/11/2000 50.00 - none 20.1284.2 GARDNER, VINCE 223.75 153.50 70.25 - - 04/11/2000 80.00- 50.1198.1 GARDOSKI, WILLIAM 77.30 53.22 24.08 - - 04/10/2000 27.91 - none 21.3048.2 GARLICK, LEWIS 494.00 179.15 82.34 99.15 133.36 04/11/2000 100.00- 74.3248.1 GARNER, KELLEY 126.38 96.26 30.12 - - 04/03/2000 35.00 - none 33.2302.1 GARRARD, DALE 81.13 53.22 27.91 - - 04/03/2000 24.08 - none 1.0450.3 GATES, TERESA 82.03 55.87 24.08 2.08 - 03117/2000 22.00- 34.0780.1 GAVIN, THEODORE 154.87 111.64 43.23 - - 04/10/2000 43.35 - none 33.0243.1 GEIS CONSTRUCTION 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - - 20.1826.1 GIBBS, LORIN 135.36 93.66 41.70 - - 03/30/2000 38.72 - none 2.0852.2 GIESLER, ANGELA 89.14 52.76 36.38 - - 02/10/2000 89.54- 2.2480.1 GILBERT, CARL 138.58 87.69 50.89 - - 04/11/2000 81.53 - none 32.0732.1 GLASER, DELMAR 127.09 83.86 43.23 - - 04/11/2000 50.89 - none 69.1703.1 GLENCO INC. 110.57 40.50 - - 70.07 09/24/1999 554.95 - none 13.0022.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - - 15.0002.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 72.24 48.16 24.08 - _ 02/22/2000 58.47- 13.2028.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 02/22/2000 43.23- 33.0332.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 74.35 48.16 26.19 - - 02/22/2000 50.64 - none 4.2160.2 GLUMM, DENNIS 129.55 86.32 43.23 - - 02/24/2000 35.57- 49.1032.3 GOADS, JOHN 216.11 144.46 71.65 - - - 52.0266.1 GODFATHER'S PIZZA 1,076.58 708.29 368.29 - - 03/10/2000 244.06 - none 21.0138.3 GOODRICH, GREG 79.14 52.76 26.38 - - 02/24/2000 26.38- 50.2082.1 GORDON, MIKE & MARSHA 66.41 49.39 17.02 - - 09/28/1999 150.00 - none 42.2588.1 GORDON, THOMAS 146.00 116.64 29.36 - - 04105/2000 100.00 - none 22.1228.'1 GOULD, TIM 127.18 89.31 37.87 - - 04/13/2000 37.87 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:32am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 31.3374.1 GOULDING, PAULINE 33.0102.1 GRAND AUTO 2.3250.1 GREEN, JAY 72.0212.1 GREEN, JUSTIN 32. 1648.1 GREEN, ROBERT & JENNIFER 15.0055.2 GRIZZLE, BILL 2.2588.1 GROESBECK, JOHN & JANA 34.0876.1 GUINARD, MATTHEW 32.1168.1 GULBIS, ANTHONY 4.0934.1 HAFER, RUSSELL 4. 1296.2 HALES, KENNETH 22.0924.1 HALL, KEVIN 19.6596.1 HAM, RUSSELL M. 33.2338.1 HAMILTON, TRACEY 46.0434.1 HAMMONS, KEVIN 42.3732.1 HANDLEY, JEREMY 74.2662.1 HANSEN, DAVID 50.2416.1 HANSEN, KORY 42.1820.1 HARRINGTON-BLACK, JODY 19.6514.1 HARRIS, JONATHON 42.0288.1 HARTW ELL, MARK 42.2734.1 HARWARD, PAUL 31.0132.1 HASKELL, PHILLIP W. 31.3036.1 HASSIS, BENJAMIN & PAM 20.1488.1 HATCH, ORSON 21.0480.1 HAYES, LOREN 31.3470.1 HERNANDEZ, TERESO 74.0384.1 HESTER, LLYOD & SHERRY 14.5002.1 HIGH DESERT CONSTRUCTION 1.0920.1 HOFFMAN, JON C 5.0722.1 HOLLEY, DAVID 32.1456.1 HOLLINGSHEAD, BRETT 33.4346.1 HOLLOWAY, RON & PAIGE 51.4250.1 HOME PRO PLUMBING 74.1202.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 74.1145.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 31.3458.1 HOPKINS, DARRYL 51.0470.1 HORTON, ROBERT 33.2652.1 HOWELL, KATHLEEN 34.2782.1 HULSE, TIM 50.1706.2 HUNT, STEVE 20.1894.2 HUSTON, ADDY 50.1606.1 INTEGRITY LLC 33.4146.1 JACOBS, DANIEL 50.4506.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 21.1712.1 JAMES, MELANIE 21.1912.1 JENKINS, DWIGHT 3.0012.1 JENNI, TERRY 21.2830.1 JESSEE, KEVIN 33.2718.1 JOHN, STEPHEN 51.3082.1 JOHNSON PROPERTY MGMNT 42.3060.1 JOHNSON, MATHEW 1.0220.1 JOHNSON, MILDRED 2.1890.2 JOHNSON, STEVEN 2.0900.1 JONES FAMILY TRUST *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to he sent 106.71 71.14 35.57 544.59 438.06 106.53 72.24 48.16 24.08 122.03 82.63 39.40 98.60 65.94 32.66 144.99 103.01 41.98 106.71 71.14 35.57 108.89 69.49 39.40 132.15 92.75 39.40 123.35 69.31 54.04 95.87 70.40 25.47 149.31 103.78 45.53 111.01 80.80 30.21 169.34 116.40 52.94 92.34 64.43 27.91 130.78 95.21 35.57 118.67 76.97 41.70 123.87 89.83 34.04 111.93 60.42 44.04 79.14 52.76 26.38 98.01 63.97 34.04 186.06 134.42 51.64 132.01 84.95 47.06 118.06 82.49 35.57 90.37 63.48 26.89 98.01 67.80 30.21 175.51 113.13 62.38 104.62 69.65 34.97 72.24 48.16 24.08 120.23 91.43 28.80 546.89 235.60 69.57 86.19 62.11 24.08 64.29 50.62 13.67 227.31 122.41 103.23 196.26 179.63 16.63 1,772.09 1,393.04 379.05 96.68 68.54 28.14 240.06 138.06 102.00 105.20 83.46 21.74 119.43 76.20 43.23 75.60 48.16 24.08 89.14 62.76 26.38 154.48 96,32 58.16 72.24 48.16 24.08 929.92 - - 75.78 59.19 16.59 84.96 57.05 27.91 98.24 80.80 17.44 111.86 71.65 40.21 72.24 48.16 24.08 81.86 57.78 24.08 98.03 61.65 36.38 1'15.35 - - 115.62 72.39 43.23 76.08 58.1 .6 17.92 Last Pmt Amount Msg 110.68 - none 106.53 - none 105.06 - none 42.63 - none 40.00 - none 64.90- 74.97 - none 43.23 -- none 43.23 - none 125.90 - none 140.23 - none 122.50 -- none 56.50 - none 24.08 - none 50.89 - none 111.15 - none 63.88 - none 66.08 - none 26.38 - none 37.87 - none 120.00 - none 50.89 - none 43.23 - none 4.85 - none 30.21 - none 87.70 - none 50.00 - none 107.13- 50.00 - none 75.00 - none 31.74 - none 25.00 - none 101.56 - none 90.50 - none 67.52 - none 35.00 - none 140.00 - none 85.14 - none 47.06 - none 50.00- 70.42- 58.16 0.00- 70.42- 58.16 - none 24.08 - none - none 50.00 - none 24.08 - none 100.00 - none 65.59 - none 72.24 - none 26.08 - none 89.40 - none 54.59 - none 70.04- 30.24 - none Last Pmt 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date - - 02/08/2000 - - 03/22/2000 - - 02/07/2000 - - 04/03/2000 - - 03/2912000 - - 04/06/2000 - - 03/02/2000 - - 03/15/2000 - - 04/11/2000 - - 02/15/2000 - - 04/06/2000 - - 02/08/2000 -- - 04/12/2000 - - 04/10/2000 - - 04/10/2000 - - 02129/2000 - - 04/11/2000 7.47 - 03/08/2000 - - 04/07/2000 - - 04/03/2000 - - 04/20/2000 - - 02114/2000 - - 04/10/2000 - 04/07/2000 - - 04/04/2000 - - 02/17/2000 - 04/17/2000 - - 02/14/2000 - - 04/07/2000 59.23 182.49 05/02/2000 - - 04/10/2000 - - 0411112000 1.67 - 02/15/2000 - - 05/01/2000 - - 05/01/2000 - - 04/12/2000 - - 04/12/2000 - - 03/15/2000 -- - 0310212000 3.36 -- 04/20/2000 - - 03/28/2000 - - 03/28/2000 - - 02/23/2000 - 929.92 - - 04105/2000 - - 04/10/2000 - - 03/07/2000 - - 03/16/2000 - - 02/03/2000 - - 04/19/2000 - - 02109/2000 34.08 81.27 11/18/1999 - - 04/13/2000 - - 04/13/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 110.68 - none 106.53 - none 105.06 - none 42.63 - none 40.00 - none 64.90- 74.97 - none 43.23 -- none 43.23 - none 125.90 - none 140.23 - none 122.50 -- none 56.50 - none 24.08 - none 50.89 - none 111.15 - none 63.88 - none 66.08 - none 26.38 - none 37.87 - none 120.00 - none 50.89 - none 43.23 - none 4.85 - none 30.21 - none 87.70 - none 50.00 - none 107.13- 50.00 - none 75.00 - none 31.74 - none 25.00 - none 101.56 - none 90.50 - none 67.52 - none 35.00 - none 140.00 - none 85.14 - none 47.06 - none 50.00- 70.42- 58.16 0.00- 70.42- 58.16 - none 24.08 - none - none 50.00 - none 24.08 - none 100.00 - none 65.59 - none 72.24 - none 26.08 - none 89.40 - none 54.59 - none 70.04- 30.24 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:33am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date Amount Msg 50.4614.1 JONES, LLYOD & SALLY 743.57 522.85 220.72 - - 04/05/2040 805.29 - none 50.2354.1 JONES, OWEN & LARA 107.94 72.37 35.57 - - 04/12/2000 39.40 - none 5.0778.1 JORGENSEN, GLEN & JANET 88.47 59.05 29.42 - - 04/10/2000 31.00 _ none 69.0568.1 JUDGE, ROGER & SANDRA 97.68 62.11 35.57 - - 04/04/2000 31.74 - none 50.4638.1 KEENE, JAMES 89.11 69.35 19.76 - -- 02111/2000 100.00 - none 2.3120.1 KELLEY, DAVID 371.79 - 40.60 35.57 295.62 12/15/1999 140.00 - none 34.3212.1 KERBS, DAVID 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 01/12/2000 48.16 - none 21.2728.1 KESLING, SCOTT & MONICA 111.15 73.28 37.87 - - 04/10/2000 55.27 - none 3.0298.1 KING, DAVID R 106.70 65.48 40.21 1.01 - 02/11/2000 100.00 - none 33.4348.1 KINGSTON, CHARLES 92.03 60.74 31.29 - - 04/11/2000 28.00 - none 3.0024.1 KINNEY, KIMIKO 119.78 81.91 37.87 - - 03/15/2000 47.92 - none 40.0116.1 KLINDT, PAUL 121.89 82.49 39.40 - - 0313112000 43.23 - none 34.0452.1 KLUM, ALLAN 245.03 - - - 245.03 - none 42.2712.1 KNAPP, JERRY B. 132.78 75.76 57.02 - - 04/13/2000 74.89 - none 34.2128.1 KNIGHT, JON 187.14 132.42 54.72 - - 02/10/2000 199.88 - none 74.0670.3 KNOLL, HARVEY 104.86 55.15 24.08 24.08 1.55 - 22.1524.2 KOCH, CARL 98.51 70.60 27.91 - -- 04/13/2000 47.91- 2.6030.1 KRASOWSKI, TQM 120.16 86.43 33.73 - - 03/14/2000 60.00 - none 31.0628.1 KYSAR, ANITA 222.07 175.01 47.06 - - 04/12/2000 62.38 - none 1.0890.1 LANTZ, STAN 76.76 54.64 22.12 - - 02/11/2000 370.00 - none 34.0784.1 LARA, RAFAEL 138.93 96.58 42.35 - - 04/10/2000 25.00 - none 42.3000.1 LARAWAY, L. CHRISTOPHER 72.07 61.65 10.42 - _ 04/10/2000 50.00 - none 2.1970.1 LARSON, KERRY L 115.56 83.86 31.70 - - 0411212000 50.00 - none 33.0108.1 LARSON, TIMOTHY 80.99 - - - 80.99 04/20/2000 10.00 - none 22.0332.1 LEE, MICHELLE 115.74 76.34 35.57 3.83 - 04103/2000 35.57 - none 33.2348.1 LEGER, RHONDA 72.51 53.36 19.15 - - 04/25/2000 24.08 - none 31.3354.1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 82.36 54.45 27.91 - - 02/25/2000 62.47 - none 42.2278.1 LEQUERICA, CINDY 153.69 104.33 49.36 - - 04/10/2000 42.23 - none 21.1480.2 LESTER, BETTE 134.27 92.57 41.70 - - 04/10/2000 57.02- 31.3496.2 LETTICH, KENNETH 59.79 48.16 11.63 - - - 34.2852.1 LEVELL, SUZANNE 94.70 60.62 34.08 - - 04/13/2000 29.22 - none 31.3382.1 LEVITT, MONTE 95.43 55.22 40.21 -- - 04/11/2000 20.08 - none 33.2278.1 LEWIS, RIK & CAROL 133.97 88.66 45.31 - - 04/13/2000 70.00 - none 50.2130.1 LIKES, JENNIFER 93.99 62.25 31.74 - - 04/12/2000 35.57 - none 20.1638.1 LINK, THOMAS 195.27 134.42 60.85 - - 04/10/2000 72.34 - none 2.0448.1 LLOYD, BRADLEY 103.57 65.66 37.91 - - 02/09/2000 219.34 - none 42.2520.1 LOCKYER, JEFFERY 97.49 85.86 11.63 - - 04/03/2000 50.00 - none 32.0602.1 LOLLEY, JUDITH 88.67 54.59 34.08 - - 02/10/2000 115.04 - none 50.2042.1 LONGSTREET, GARRET 82.76 57.05 25.71 - - 12/21/1999 58.56 - none 34.0814.1 LONGWORTH, ERIC 180.99 103.29 77.70 - - 04/04/2000 42.89 - none 2.4270.1 LORD, LARRY R. 90.40 58.16 24.08 8.16 - 03/17/2000 50.00 - none 2.0402.1 LUBACKY, ANDREW & DANITA 119.29 95.21 24.08 - - 04/06/2000 27.19 - none 32.1320.1 LUKE, DAVID C 79.45 46.51 32.94 - - 04/10/2000 24.08 - none 21.2182.1 LUNA, JUAN S. 171.79 126.26 45.53 - - 04/07/2000 46.61 - none 74.3072.1 LYTLE, CHAD & STACEY 92.81 62.60 30.21 - - 02/09/2000 70.42 - none 74.2840.1 MACHO, CRAIG & TAMMY 169.64 113.90 49.36 6.38 - 03/13/2000 30.00 - none 2.4480.1 MADRID, JOSEPH F 88.53 50.62 37.91 - - 02/09/2000 88.93 - none 2.5980.1 MALYUREK, VICKIE 142.76 95.48 27.91 19.37 - 03/07/2000 50.00 - none 5.0268.1 MANOS, PETER 290.14 183.54 106.60 - - 03/10/2000 187.02 - none 51.0518.3 MARSHALL, CHEYANNE 318.62 257.69 54.72 6.21 - - 33.1850.1 MARSHALL, GARY & BOBETTE 91.08 73.00 18.08 - - 03/2312000 50.00 - none 21.1878.1 MARSTON, KELLI 300.00 - - - 300.00 04/20/2000 57.35 - none 42.1950.1 MARTIN, DANIEL K. 95.69 61.65 34.04 - - 04/05/2000 30.21 - none 34.0994.1 MASON, DREW & VICKIE 91.13 57.05 34.08 -- - 02/16/2000 168.56 - none 32.0802.1 MATHIEUS, MICHAEL 73.47 49.39 24.08 - - 03/0712000 55.82 -- none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent t R f [f CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 7 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:33am Current Period: 0513112000 Delinquent Minimum of $'10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 2.1470.1 MAXWELL, MARGO 42.2072.1 MCCLINTICK, TODD & LE1SA 74.3208.1 MCCULLOUGH, JIM 1.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 3.0382.1 MCENROE, JOHN & AGATHA 32.0230.1 MCFADDEN, LEONARD 68.0098.1 MCGILVERY, BELINDA 69.0714.1 MCGOURTY, MARY 31.3242.1 MCGOWAN, DAVID E. 74.2334.1 MCINTYRE, DUANE 21.0062.1 MCKAY, CINDY 31.0822.1 MCKAY, JOHN 31.2192.1 MCMILLAN, VICKI 33.2402.1 MCPHERSON, JO ANN 50.3726.1 MEATTE, NICKIE 20.1664.1 MEDLEY, STEVEN 50.0326.1 MEEK, JEANNE ANN 21.2754.1 MELTON, GARY 69. 1249.1 MER GRNS #3 HOMEOWNERS A 69.0981.1 MERIDIAN GREENS HOMEOWNE 69.1659.1 MERIDIAN GRNS HOMEOWNER 74.3790.1 MERRITHEW, ROBERT 42.2552.1 METHNER, JACK C. 21.0094.1 METIVIER, JAMES 74.3246.1 MEYER, JOHN & LISA 4.0888.1 MICHAEL CAMPBELL CONSTRU( 4.0688.1 MICHAEL CAMPELL CONSTRUC- 19.1708.2 MICHAS, ,LAMES 1.3330.2 MIGNEAULT, LESLIE 3.0128.1 MILLER, GREGORY 31.05681 MILLER, NEIL 34.2044.1 MILLER, WILLIAM G. 46.0886.1 MINEGAR, JOHN 1.2420.1 MIRONOV, BARBARA & OLEG 34.0830.1 MIZE, JIM C 2.6470.1 MOHR, DANIEL & SUSAN 40.0202.1 MONTES, KENNETH 34.1540.1 MONTEFERRANTE, MICHELLE 74.2832.1 MOONEY, KEVIN 69.0666.1 MOORE, K. DWAYNE & LINDA 46.0222.1 MOORE, KEVIN & LISA 32.0816.1 MOORE, RICK T. 4.2226.1 MOOREHOUSE, SEAN & DENISE 32.0804.1 MORGAN, CHARLES 74.2495.1 MORRIS, ROCKY 2.5630.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE 21 .3296.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE & VICKI 21.2.222.1 MORRISON, ROBERT & CORINNI 42.1978.1 MORSE, DAVID & SHELLEY 22.1414.1 MOSGROVE, G. THOMAS & RON 2.0526.1 MOSSI, DAVID L 34.0500.1 MOURITSEN, LAYNE 4.1804.1 MURPHY, WILLIAM 3.0670.1 MURRAY, WAYNE 51.0450.1 MURRI'S ELECTRONICS *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Balance Non-Delina 02129/2000 01/3112000 12/31/1999 Date 112.82 82.03 30.79 - 154.09 100.90 53.19 - 100.61 70.40 30.21 - 68.80 54.64 14.16 - 134.26 104.87 29.39 - 161.30 114.24 47.06 - 142.60 89.41 53.19 - 106.28 74.37 31.91 - 111.49 79.75 31.74 - 109.93 81.26 28.67 - 106.71 74.97 31.74 - 127.09 83.86 43.23 - 169.55 114.87 54.68 - 145.53 91.06 54.47 - 111.77 76.20 35.57 - 125.38 84.49 40.89 -- 82.24 48.16 34.08 - 113.61 75.74 37.87 - 44.76 8.10 - - 62.94 3.24 - - 77.11 11.34 - - 108.41 70.54 37.87 - 118.45 86.71 31.74 - 89.09 73.14 15.95 - 187.32 129.53 57.79 - 185.34 122.19 63.15 - 87.42 59.51 27.91 - 122.50 88.46 34.04 - 135.89 103.75 32.14 - 103.58 50.82 26.38 26.38 118.34 78.94 39.40 - 111.91 76.34 35.57 - 86.80 56.59 30.21 -- 140.81 97.58 43.23 - 292.59 -- - - 100.28 68.54 31.74 - 93.85 65.94 27.91 - 74.65 48.16 26.49 - 126.11 84.63 41.48 - 82.83 56.45 26.38 - 116.23 86.20 30.03 - 142.15 98.92 43.23 - 119.43 80.03 39.40 - 212.98 91.52 43.23 54.72 127.79 89.69 38.10 - 152.80 107.65 45.15 - 134.61 95.21 39.40 - 71.52 52.76 18.76 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 207.18 150.16 57.02 - 222.70 148.83 73.87 - 109.31 85.23 24.08 - 103.35 55.48 37.87 - 116.97 81.40 35.57 -- 195.12 130.08 55.04 -- - 02/23/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 01/03/2000 - 03/22/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 03/1512000 - 04/11/2000 - 03/02/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 02/07/2000 - 04/1212000 04/20/2000 02/01/2000 - 04/1112000 02/11/2000 - 02/22/2000 36.66 09/29/1999 59.70 10/1911999 65.77 10/19/1999 - 04/11/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/05/2000 - 02/24/2000 - 03/30/2000 - 04/21/2000 - 01/07/2000 - 02/24/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 02/03/2000 - 03/13/2000 292.59 - 02115/2000 - 0310112000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 02/14/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/16/2000 23.51 04/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 04/10/2000 - 04/10/2000 -- 04/11/2000 - 04/05/2000 - 03/2912000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/07/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 04112/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 41.12 - none 55.21 - none 34.04 - none 69.71- 50.00 - none 62.38 - none 41.70 - none 40.00 - none 31.74 - none 51.66 - none 28.26 - none 78.80 - none 57.87 - none 59.92 - none 116.97 - none 64.00 - none 71.63 - none 83.34 -- none 58.23 - none 60.36- 713.57 - none 37.87 - none 39.40 - none 70.00 - none 23.24 - none 59.32 - none 49.36- 60.00- 88-17 9.36- 60.00- 88.17 - none 60.89 -- none 43.23 - none 52.76 -- none 65.23 - none - none 50.89 - none 35.57 - none 22.00 - none 53.00 - none 52.76 - none 30.00 - none 47.06 - none 35.57 - none 20.00 - none 100.00 - none 100.00 - none 50.89 - none 25.00 - none 24.08 - none 87.66 -- none 85.36 none 35.29 - none 95.69 - none 43.23 - none 65.04 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent �f t CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:34am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/3111999 Date Amount Msg 32.1606.2 NASIATKA, JEFFREY 84.70 60.62 24.08 - - 03/15/2000 55.96- 68.0086.1 NEITZEL, KENNETH & HEIDI 155.20 109.67 45.53 - - 04/12/2000 45.53 - none 20.1944.1 NEWBOLD, GARY C. 114.72 74.51 40.21 - - 02/10/2000 162.97 - none 1.3200.1 NEWKIRK, MARYANN 93.72 69.56 24.08 .08 04/11/2000 24.00 - none 69.0152.1 N IELSON, CRAIG 125.95 115.27 10.68 - - 04/11/2000 53.19 - none 22.1290.1 NIGH, MICHAEL 125.64 103.64 22.00 - - 04117/2000 75.00 - none 31.0726.1 N ITZ, JASON 118.56 48.16 24.08 24.08 22.24 03/06/2000 89.37 - none 21.0498.1 NOLAND, SHAWN 83.73 59.65 24.08 - - 04111/2000 27.91 - none 1.3420.1 NORMAN, JEANNIE 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 04/11/2000 24.08 - none 50.1464.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 234.70 219.79 14.91 - - 03/20/2000 158.92 - none 50.1456.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 633.63 413.48 220.15 - - 03/20/2000 158.72 - none 65.3158.2 NOWLIN, ROBERT 86.19 58.28 27.91 - - 02/08/2000 55.82- 2.1530.1 OBENCHAIN, JAIME 126.17 102.20 23.97 - - 04/24/2000 80.00 - none 21.2744.1 ORTON, JOHN & LARAINE 89.03 - 22.65 26.38 40.00 11/09/1999 85.76 - none 50.1918.1 OSTERHOUT, JUSTIN 104.85 75.60 29.25 - - 04/05/2000 35.00 - none 51.3430.1 OVERTON, DAVID C 98.44 65.94 27.91 4.59 - 03/13/2000 50.00 - none 50.3898.1 OWEN, KEVIN 102.92 67.03 31.74 4.15 - 04/10/2000 53.00 - none 21.2230.1 PAGE, LINDA 79.14 52.76 26.38 - - 04/11/2000 26.38 - none 31.3280.1 PALMER, PAT 214.90 144.86 70.04 - - 04/12/2000 62.38 - none 32.0638.2 PALMER, PAT 131.07 64.71 31.74 34.62 - 02/14/2000 60.00- 743044.1 PARRISH, STEVE 113.47 79.43 34.04 - - 04107/2000 41.51 - none 46.0240.1 PATTERSON, RYAN 260.97 - 22.65 36.38 201.94 03/22/2000 50.00 - none 19.6616.1 PAUL, BRIAN 87.37 72.05 15.32 - - 05/01/2000 26.38 - none 51.0318.3 PAULEN, BEN 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 03/01/2000 24.08- 4.1240.1 PEARSON, RONALD 132.50 84.63 47.87 - - 02/10/2000 116.07 - none 15.0048.2 PEBBLES-KORBER, GAIL 95.85 68.54 27.31 - - 04/05/2000 40.00- 20.1770.2 PEGRAM, TIMOTHY 81.27 57.19 24.08 - - 03/13/2000 35.57- 21.3160.1 PETERSEN, DOUGLAS & JENNIF 107.36 75.60 31.76 - - 04/11/2000 42.50 - none 2.3732.1 PHAM, KIMAN 121.73 84.63 37.10 - - 04/10/2000 44.00 - none 42.1842.1 PHILLIPS, JAMES 88.53 50.62 37.91 - - 02/10/2000 65.76 - none 74.3000.1 PHILLIPS, RICHARD 116.07 78.20 37.87 - - 02114/2000 68.08 - none 34. 1560.1 PHILP, HAROLD 102.46 70.72 31.74 - - 04/03/2000 39.40 - none 22.1526.1 PIERCE, TANYA 219.36 144.68 74.68 - - 04/06/2000 80.40 - none 42.1160.1 PIETRZAK, JOHN 102.45 70.54 31.91 - - 03/30/2000 20.00 - none 2.1870.1 PIPER, LARRY 74.70 50.62 24.08 - - 03/10/2000 24.08 - none 22.1564.1 PITTI, JOHN JOSEPH 261.31 178.48 82.83 - - 10/26/1999 245.87 - none 19.6644.1 PLACE, WILLIAM 91.66 61.65 30.01 - - 03/27/2000 30.41 - none 34.0832.1 PLETCHER, MICHAEL R 71.32 48.16 23.16 - - 04/10/2000 25.00 -- none 2.3340.1 POE, RICHARD 91.51 63.34 28.17 - - 04/05/2000 40.00 - none 3.0332.1 PORTER, DAVID 110.54 74.97 35.57 - - 03/07/2000 73.74 - none 69.0522.1 PORTER, DOUGLAS 84.96 57.05 27.91 - - 04/03/2000 35.57 - none 3.0116.1 PORTER, TAD 95.69 65.48 30.21 - - 02/09/2000 93.23 - none 50.2402.1 POWELL, RANDY 135.98 92.75 43.23 - - 04/11/2000 72.38 - none 34.1172.1 QUARNBERG, CARL & DOROTH' 162.93 112.04 50.89 - - 04/12/2000 63.66 - none 7.0886.1 QUINN, JILL 80.37 53.99 26.38 - - 04/12/2000 27.61 - none 19.0220.1 RADY, STEVE 109.17 77.43 31.74 - - 03/14/2000 35.57 - none 50.2390.2 REED, LORETTA 158.40 96.02 62.38 - - 04/05/2000 77.70- 64.4062.1 REMARKABLE HOMES INC 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - - 4.0542.2 RES, SHAWN 148.92 93.52 55.40 - - 02/11/2000 138.84- 33.4578.1 RHINEHART, DOUG & MARY 81.88 70.86 11.02 - - 04/28/2000 20.00 - none 32.1694.1 RICE, E. DONALD 138.44 95.21 43.23 - - 04/10/2000 54.72 - none 1.2770.1 RIGENHAGEN, HAROLD E 78.72 54.64 24.08 - - 04/10/2000 24.08 - none 42.1844.1 RIVERA, REGENA 166.28 90.54 47.87 27.87 - 04/13/2000 60.00 - none 32.0458.2 ROAM, JACQUELINE 78.09 67.17 10.92 - - 01/03/2000 165.00- 50.2432.2 ROBERTS, BOB 133.44 106.38 27.06 - - 03/2212000 100.00 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:35am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 21.0492.1 ROBERTS, CHARLES 74.3210.1 ROBINSON, LONNIE 2.5170.1 RODRIGUEZ, JILL 2.0970.1 ROEPKER, DAVID 51.3310.1 ROGERS, MILDRED 74.3090.1 RCGERS, WAYNE & SUSAN 69.1614.1 ROHM, FRANK 50.0158.1 RON SMITH C ONSTRUCTION 50.0154.1 RON SMITH CONSTRUCTION 2.4710.1 ROSE, DEANNA 21.2006.1 ROSE, MARK & TAMARA 42.2404.1 ROSE, PHOEBE 74.2708.2 ROSS, EUGENE 69.1076.1 RUPERT, DAVID & LAURIE 2.3180.1 RYAN, WALTER 51.3198.1 RYKER, AN ITA 33.2616.1 SAILORS, GREG 19.7156.1 SALAZAR, DANIEL 33.2324.2 SAUNDERS, KELLEY 69.1094.1 SCARRONE, MARIO & GWEN 22.1386.1 SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL 15.0064.1 SCHAFFNER CONSTRUCTION 32.0652.1 SCHLAPIA, SCOTT 34.2122.1 SCHMIDT, GLEN 74.3170.2 SCHNEIDERMAN, MATTHEW 42.3050.1 SCHOLZ, LESLIE 65.3108.1 SCOTT, DANNY 1.2260.1 SCOTT, DAVID 4.0930.1 SCOTT, TANYA 1.2040.1 SEAMONS, DOUGLAS 69.2262.1 SEDILLO, JOE 2.6440.1 SHADDICK, FREDRICK J 74.2890.1 SHAFFER, ROBERT 31.0158.1 SHARP, MARIETTA D. 21 A 138.2 SHELTROWN, ROGER 74.3960.1 SHERARD, BILL 74.2758.1 SHIELDS, LAURA 42.2496.1 SIEMON, LESLIE 74.3096.1 SIGMOND, SERGIO 34.0724.2 SILCOX, BENJAMIN 22. 1504.1 SIMPSON, RANDY 74.0416.1 SIMS, PATRICIA 31.3236.2 SINCLAIR, KEN 4.1914.1 SINGKHAOPET, SYLEU 21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 34.0436.1 SKELTON, RANDY 1.2290.1 SLIGER, KIM 21.1066.1 SMALLWOOD, NEIL 2.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 2.4360.1 SMITH, ANNETTE 31.0134.1 SMITH, BRADLEY 4.0532.1 SMITH, JOHN 50.0012.1 SMITH, PAUL H. 2.6170.1 SMITH, SHANE 31.3528.1 SMITH, SHAWN *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent 75.02 59.05 15.97 - - 90.63 60.42 30.21 - - 129.78 89.06 40.72 - - 111.24 54.31 27.91 29.02 68.64 45.76 22.88 - 84.70 60.62 24.08 - - 100.89 70.68 30.21 - - 80.04 55.96 24.08 - - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - 132.15 85.09 47.06 - - 121.91 86.34 35.57 - - 92.79 65.80 26.99 - - 192.11 118.01 70.85 3.25 - 132.50 99.95 32.55 - - 73.78 50.62 23.16 - - 174.28 123.39 50.89 - - 128.20 96.46 31.74 - - 78.53 54.45 24.08 - - 119.31 83.74 35.57 - - 198.63 132.42 66.21 - - 131.34 94.75 30.21 6.38 - 73.47 49.39 24.08 - - 201.62 162.22 39.40 - - 111.29 81.65 27.91 1.73 - 86.52 61.51 25.01 - - 108.70 79.43 29.27 - - 96.78 66.57 30.21 - - 104.03 55.87 24.08 24.08 - 76.96 52.76 24.20 - -- 155.49 87.87 67.62 - - 163.48 106.42 57.06 - - 138A4 99.04 39.40 - - 107.94 80.03 27.91 - - 81.41 67.17 14.24 - - 125.85 104.50 21.35 - - 143.85 105.98 37.87 - -- 121.27 83.40 37.87 - - 126.33 88.46 37.87 - - 109.06 85.74 23.32 - - 78.53 50.62 27.91 - - 114.32 77.94 36.38 - - 78.31 55.82 22.49 - - 101.25 59.51 41.74 - - 154.25 108.72 45.53 - - 114.08 91.57 22.51 - - 94.32 67.94 26.38 - - 88.16 67.08 21.08 - - 75.78 58.16 17.62 - - 113.14 77.57 35.57 - - 168.98 79.91 89.07 - - 138.18 98.78 39.40 - - 106.96 94.20 12.76 - - 153.09 103.29 47.06 2.74 - 82.97 52.76 30.21 - - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - - Last Pmt Last Pmt 04/11/2000 04/12/2000 03/14/2000 04/28/2000 04/05/2000 04/05/2000 03/01/2000 0210312000 04/11/2000 04/10/2000 03/29/2000 04/04/2000 04/1012000 02/03/2000 04/1012000 03/13/2000 04/13/2000 02/08/2000 03/09/2000 03/31/2000 02/16/2000 03/0212000 03/08/2000 04/20/2000 03/15/2000 04/10/2000 03/09/2000 04/11/2000 03/01/2000 02/07/2000 04/11/2000 04/11/2000 04/03/2000 03/10/2000 03/31/2000 02/07/2000 03/16/2000 04/10/2000 02110/2000 04/13/2000 03/16/2000 04/11/2000 02111/2000 04/25/2000 04/10/2000 03/17/2000 04/13/2000 03/17/2000 04/12/2000 04/10/2000 03/0212000 punt Msg 40.00 - none 30.21 - none 75.00 - none 100.00 - none 22.88 - none 23.16 - none 73.28 - none 106.72 - none 43.23 - none 25.00 _ none 40.00- 70.00 0.00-70.00 - none 25.00 - none 124.76 - none 39.40 - none 17.60- 47.06- 151.57 7.60- 47.06- 151.57 - none 100.00 - none 70.93 - none 150.00 - none 64.39- 38.00 - none 37.87 - none 53.90 - none 25.00 - none 64.48 - none 45.41 - none 47.06 - none 95.22 - none 30.17 - none 60.85 - none 15.53 - none 94.89 - none 60.00 - none 24.08- 67.35 - none 20.00 - none 87.56- 51.17 - none 111.07- 30.21 - none 101.93 - none 24.08 - none 43.21 - none 302.88 - none 50.89 - none 40.00 - none 50.00 - none 26.38 - none 16.70 - none CITY OF MERIDIAN Cust No Name 72.0266.1 SOMAZZI, ROGER 32.1576.1 SON, DAVID 21.3164.1 SOWER, MICHAEL 22.1270.1 SPARLING, ROBERT & MARTHA 2.3430.1 SPEARS, BRYCE J. 69.1374.1 SPENCER CONSTRUCTION 3.0844.1 STAMMERJOHN, JIMMY 2.1160.1 STATES, DION 51.3280.1 STENSON, VIRGINIA 50.2182.1 STERLING, TARA 2.5400.1 STEVENSON, MICHAEL 34.1800.1 STONER, JERRY 22.1380.1 STORER, GEORGE & PATRICIA 31.0878.2 STRICKLIN, PHILIP 32.1710.1 STROEBEL, SEAN 21.1058.1 STUBBLEFIELD, MARK 69.0646.1 SUDERMAN, MARK 46.0536.2 SWANSON, DAVID 31.1006.1 SWEAT, STEVEN M. 69.1278.1 T C MILLER 2.0958.1 TANAKA, TINA 50.1676.2 TAVARES, MARVIN 22.0860.2 TEATER, SUSAN 20.1964.1 TECOINVESTMENTS 50.1020.1 TECOINVESTMENTS 33.0056.1 TEL -CAR INC. 2.1190.1 TERRELL, A 2.1930.1 TERRY, TIMOTHY 74.1114.1 THATCHER, TIMOTHY 2.0952.1 THOMAS, TIMOTHY 32.1558.2 THOMPSON, GARY 34.1550.1 THOMPSON, HARRY 1.1940.1 THORNE, TORY L 21.2732.1 THURBER, RON 35.5048.1 TIM AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION 69.0226.1 TIMA, KAREN 42.2544.2 TINTSMAN,TODD 46.0210.1 TODD, JEFF 2.2200.3 TODD, RICK 40.0250.1 TOMICH, LONNY 74.2464.1 TOWN, NEAL 4.0928.1 TREES, ROY 31.2254.1 TURNER, RAYMOND 34.2104.1 TYLER, HEIDI 31.3406.1 ULIN, MARY H. 5.0456.1 UPTON, CHAD 74.2876.1 USSERY, TRACY 69.1192.1 USTICK, JOHN & KATHRYN 22.0178.1 VALD EZ, ADALFO 19.0120.2 VANLEUVEN, MATTHEW 21.2946.1 VARNER, GERALD & SHAWNA 2.0466.1 VICK, WILLIAM & KELLY 2.4550.1 VINCENT, TOMMY 7.1052.1 VINEGARD, JAMES 42.0324.1 VINES. MARK *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:35am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Balance Non-Delin❑ 02/29/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date 98.29 64.25 34.04 - 66.32 48.16 18.16 - 77.60 66.71 10.89 - 682.81 66.85 18.62 37.91 130.66 91.26 39.40 - 109.14 85.06 24.08 - 76.90 52.76 24.14 - 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 305.59 137.60 77.70 66.21 135.98 92.75 43.23 - 96.45 64.71 31.74 - 106.71 71.14 35.57 - 370.57 - - - 89.82 65.94 23.88 - 337.50 - - 10.00 156.85 101.32 55.53 - 113.05 79.01 34.04 - 79.13 48.16 30.97 - 90.63 60.42 30.21 - 127.55 80.83 42.20 4.52 103.64 65.82 37.82 - 110.42 62.76 26.38 21.28 151.00 39.80 19.90 36.38 79.14 52.76 26.38 - 148.41 70.88 77.53 - 320.11 170.00 150.11 - 107.34 82.37 24.97 - 144.78 - - - 132.15 88.92 43,23 - 97.82 69.91 27.91 - 116.83 81.26 35.57 - 10.00 - 10.00 - 276.39 214.26 62.13 - 248.88 176.97 30.21 41.70 72.24 48.16 24.08 - 170.24 92.29 77.95 - 100.00 68.26 31.74 - 96.92 66.71 30.21 - 82.24 58.16 24.08 - 109.05 67.31 41.74 - 172.29 115.27 57.02 - 77.64 53.99 23,65 - 248.28 - - - 124.37 84.97 39.40 - 92.62 64.71 27.91 - 554.14 - - 36.38 174.89 117.87 57.02 - 137.68 92.15 45.53 - "104.44 70.40 34.04 - 58.95 48.16 10.79 - 135.77 121.70 14.07 - 111.77 76.20 35.57 - 116.70 57.05 27.91 31.74 89.14 62.76 26.38 - 123.45 85.58 37.87 - - 04/04/2000 02/25/2000 - 04/11/2000 559.43 1012111999 - 04/05/2000 02/17/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 02/08/2000 24.08 - 02/07/2000 04/11/2000 - 02108/2000 370.57 - 03/14/2000 327.50 08/18/1999 - 03/07/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 02/22/2000 - 0211112000 - 04/13/2000 - 04/10/2000 54.92 11/16/1999 - 04/11/2000 - 04/12/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/13/2000 144.78 10/01/1999 - 04/10/2000 - 02/01/2000 - 03/01/2000 - 02/22/2000 - 03/14/2000 - 01/11/2000 - 04/24/2000 - 03/06/2000 - 04105/2000 - 04/11/2000 - 04/04/2000 - 03/21/2000 - 03/15/2000 248.28 - 04/12/2000 - 04/07/2000 517.76 09/15/1999 - 04/12/2000 03/29/2000 - 02125/2000 - 03/28/2000 - 04/18/2000 - 03/10/2000 - 03/16/2000 - 02/24/2000 Last Pmt Amount Msg 14.25 - none 30.00 - none 40.00 - none 201.00 - none 40.22 - none 24.08- 25.00 - none 82.64 none - none 54.72 - none 35.57 - none 106.85 - none - none 50.00- 171.09 - none 41.45 - none 41.70 - none 3.11- 63.02 - none 43.00 - none 3.00 - none 3.42- 26.38 - none 24.25 - none 134.90 - none 50.00 - none 82.59 - none 35.57 -- none 49.06 -- none 43.23 - 86.22 - none 81.28 - none 169.35 - none 55.00 - none 39.40- 39.65 -- none 24.08- 21.59 - none 60.85 - none 38.00 - none - none 33.42 - none 35.57 - none 262.50 - none 68.51 - none 53.19 -- none 75.74 - none 100.00 - none 47.06 - none 30.51 - none 52.76 - none 78.34 - none y CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 11 Standard Payment Customers May 03,2000 10:36am Current Period: 05/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 10.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Cust No Name 21.0004.1 WALKER FAMILY TRUST 31.0608.1 WALKER, MICHAEL 1.3340.1 WALSH, RGN 4.2132.1 WALSTON, DOUGLAS 21.2240.1 WARD, MIKE 22.1156.2 WARE, JAIMEE 20.1846.1 WARE, MICKEY L. 74.2330.1 WASSON, LEE & KARI 21.2714.1 WATERMAN, LORI 3.0100.1 WEATHERMON, TINA 2.6080.1 WEBB, GERALD 21.1968.2 WELDIN, TAMRA 69.2298.1 W ES EMAN, DIANE 74.2638.1 WEST, LARRY 34.3266.1 WESTERN FINANCIAL SERVICE.' 2.1370.1 WHITE, DEBRA LYNN 32.0846.1 WHITE, LUCILLE 5.0792.1 WICK, DON 52.0262.1 WILD SHAMROCK LLP 69.1304.1 WILDE, KENNETH 2.2040.1 WILLIAMS, FRED 74.0356.1 WILSON, DEANA 3.0004.1 WILSON, JAN 34.1954.1 WINGATE, DIANE 7.0880.2 WINKLER, GREG 3.0052.2 W I N N, MARY 4.2054.1 WINTER, JEFFREY & PAIGE 50.4490.3 WINTERS, BRIAN 1.2010.1 WISDOM, RICK S 31.3230.1 WITT, STEPHEN M. 20.1272.1 WOLFE, TAMI 32.1560.1 WOOD, ADRON 22.1492.1 WOODINGTON, PATRICK 74.3308.1 WOODLAND, WAIDE T 31.3344.1 WOODRUFF, NOEL R 22.1622.1 WRIGHT, DARRIN 19.6500.1 WRIGHT, SHEILA 74.3348.2 YEATTS, PAMELA 2.0670.1 YOUNG, AUSTIN L 50.3740.1 YOUNG, DARON 31.3248.2 YOUNG, DENNIS 7.0960.1 YOUNG, LESLIE 2.0350.1 ZI EGLER, WILLIAM 33.3570.1 ZOELLER, KATHRYN Grand Totals: Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer.Cust No = (<I 9900000 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Amount Msg 50.00 - none 100.00 - none 191.33 - none 26.38 - none 68.51 none 34.15- 37.87 none 45.53 - none 40.00 - none 31.58 - none 26.38 - none 89.54- 57.02 - none 24.64 - none 85.31 - none 40.00 - none 27.91 - none 68.51 none 670.70 none 68.10 - none 106.58 - none 80.00 - none 26.38 - none 37.87 - none 20.64- 24.00 0.64-24.00 - none 65.00- 27.91 - none 24.08 - none 30.00 - none - none 40.85 - none 49.36 - none 50.00 - none 37.87 - none 53.19 - none 40.84- 100.00 - none 24.08 - none 41.74- 34-04 - none 50.00 - none 55.08 _ none Last Pmt Balance Non-Delinq 02129/2000 01/31/2000 12/31/1999 Date 150.84 75.74 37.87 37.23 - 03/07/2000 141.33 100.15 41.18 - - 03/15/2000 165.69 - - - 165.69 10/15/1999 80.37 53.99 26.38 - - 04/06/2000 174.89 117.87 57.02 - - 04/10/2000 80.81 65.48 15.33 - - 04/11/2000 105.95 71.91 34.04 - - 04/11/2000 132.50 94.63 37.87 - - 04/12/2000 129.99 89.69 40.30 - - 03/23/2000 103.35 69.31 34.04 - - 04/10/2000 79.14 52.76 26.38 - - 02/24/2000 79.14 52.76 26.38 -- - 02/08/2000 131.53 89.83 41.70 -- - 04/11/2000 74.54 48.16 24.64 1.74 - 04/04/2000 92.90 71.00 21.90 - - 05101/2000 84.37 69.91 14.46 - - 03/21/2000 75.93 51,85 24.08 - - 02/28/2000 168.60 115.41 53.19 - - 04/12/2000 944.35 635.95 308.40 - - 02/28/2000 221.41 107.19 45.53 64.68 4.01 03/31/2000 157.34 82.37 31.74 43.23 - 03/16/2000 110.46 97.83 12.63 -- - 04/12/2000 79.14 52.76 26.38 - - 04/10/2000 107.18 73.14 34.04 - - 04/11/2000 108.67 49.39 59.28 -- - 02/08/2000 41.68 26.38 15.30 - - 118.41 99.18 19.23 - - 03/30/2000 90.91 64.57 26.34 - - 03/30/2000 102.65 70.91 31.74 - - 02122/2000 62.92 50.62 12.30 - - 04/20/2000 124.31 102.55 21.76 - - 04/28/2000 33.76 - - 19,32 14.44 170.83 150.83 20.00 - - 03/20/2000 139.05 97,35 41.70 - - 03/06/2000 161.99 103.18 51.66 7.15 - 04/1212000 86.80 60.42 26.38 - - 04/14/2000 139.05 9735 41.70 - - 03/08/2000 85.43 55.22 30.21 - - 02108/2000 286.57 91.52 24.08 80.04 90.93 02122/2000 75.93 51.85 24.08 - - 04/06/2000 106.45 74.71 31.74 - - 04/13/2000 99.10 68.89 30.21 - - 04/04/2000 300.51 147.41 153.10 - - 04/07/2000 170.27 48.16 24.08 24.08 73.95 04/13/2000 82,722.79 51,535.60 22,371.86 1,884.60 6,930.73 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent Last Pmt Amount Msg 50.00 - none 100.00 - none 191.33 - none 26.38 - none 68.51 none 34.15- 37.87 none 45.53 - none 40.00 - none 31.58 - none 26.38 - none 89.54- 57.02 - none 24.64 - none 85.31 - none 40.00 - none 27.91 - none 68.51 none 670.70 none 68.10 - none 106.58 - none 80.00 - none 26.38 - none 37.87 - none 20.64- 24.00 0.64-24.00 - none 65.00- 27.91 - none 24.08 - none 30.00 - none - none 40.85 - none 49.36 - none 50.00 - none 37.87 - none 53.19 - none 40.84- 100.00 - none 24.08 - none 41.74- 34-04 - none 50.00 - none 55.08 _ none BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL 05-03-00 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) Case No. AZ -00-005 APPLICATION OF HOWELL ) MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CORPORATION, THE ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND APPLICATION FOR ) DECISION AND ORDER ANNEXATION AND ZONING ) GRANTING APPLICATION OF 20.26 ACRES FOR THE ) FOR ANNEXATION AND PROPOSED STRATFOR.D ) ZONING BUSINESS PARI, LOCATED ) ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF ) LOCUST GROVE ROAD ) BETWEEN FRANIQ.IN ROAD ) AND I-84, MERIDIAN, IDAHO ) The above entitled annexation and zoning application having come on for public hearing on May 2, 2000, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., and Shari Stiles, Planning and Zoning Administrator, appeared and testified, and appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant was Dave Williams, and the City Council having duly considered the evidence and the record in this matter therefore makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The notice of public hearing on the application for annexation and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 1 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) zoning was published for two (2) consecutive weeks prior to said public hearing scheduled for May 2, 2000, before the City Council, the first publication appearing and written notice having been mailed to property owners or purchasers of record within three hundred feet (300') of the external boundaries of the property under consideration more than fifteen (15) days prior to said hearing and with the notice of public hearing having been posted upon the property under consideration more than one week before said hearing; and that copies of all notices were made available to newspaper, radio and television stations as public service announcements; and the matter having been duly considered by the City Council at the May 2, 2000, public hearing; and the applicant, affected property owners, and government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Meridian, having been given full opportunity to express comments and submit evidence. 2. There has been compliance with all notice and hearing requirements set forth in Idaho Code §§ 67-6509 and 67-6511, and Meridian City Code §§ 11-15-5 and 11-16-1. 3. The City Council takes judicial notice of its zoning, subdivisions and development ordinances codified at Titles 11 and 12, Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof, and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, ordinance No. 629, January 4,1994, and maps and the ordinance Establishing the Impact Area Boundary. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 2 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) 4. The property which is the subject to the application for annexation and zoning is described in the application, and by this reference is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. The property is approximately 20.26 acres in size and is located along the west side of Locust Grove Road between Franklin Road and I-84. The property is designated as Stratford Business Park. 5. The owner of record of the subject property is Howell Murdoch Development Corp., of Boise, Idaho. 6. Applicant is owner of record. 7. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as Rural Transitional (R -T), and consists of vacant land. 8. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as Medium Density Residential (R-8). 9. , The subject property is bordered to the north by Light Industrial, to the west by General Retail and Service Commercial, to the South by county residential zoning to the east by the proposed Woodbridge Subdivision zoned R-4 and city limits of the City of Meridian are adjacent and abut to the north and west of the subject property. 10. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. 11. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 3 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 12. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: develop a police station and other uses as permitted in the R-8 zone and compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances. 13. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as R-8 which is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. 14. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. 15. Giving due consideration to the comment received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the following conditions of development are imposed: Adopt the Recommendations of Planning and Zoning and Engineering staff as follows: Adopt the Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning and Engineering departments as follows: 15.1 Any existing irrigation drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped should be shown on the site plans. Plans will need to be FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 4 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 15.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 15.3 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 15.4 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 15.5 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 15.6 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance. 15.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs will be permitted. 15.8 Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City ordinance. 15.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 15.10 The legal description submitted for the property is correct and places the parcels contiguous to existing city limits. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page S AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (A.Z-00-005) 15.11 The proposed R-8 zone is in compliance with the current Comprehensive Plan for single family residential. 15.12 The proposed name of Stratford Business Park should not be approved as part of this application because business parks are prohibited in R-8. Instead it should be named Stratford Park. The park cannot be proposed until the comprehensive plan for the property changes. 15.13 Staff has done an initial review of the parcel in regard to the current Comprehensive Plan Update process. The current draft of the future land use map does show the area as commercial. 15.14 All non-residential uses of the property will be required to follow the Conditional Use process. Commercial uses shown in the Zoning Schedule of Use Control as `prohibited' will remain prohibited. The requirement for all non-commercial uses to follow the CUP process may be changed at a future date by a revised development agreement if the property is rezoned. 15.15 A minimum 20 -foot landscape buffer beyond all right of way should be required as a condition of annexation. 15.16 A Development Agreement is required as a condition of annexation. 15.17 The Applicant shall be required to follow through with the platting requirements as per Meridian City Code. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 15.18 Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (Or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 15.19 Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location, elevation and grade of the sidewalk with District staff. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 6 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) 15.20 Extend Watertower Lane into the site as a 40 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 58 -feet of fight-of- way- 15.21 ght-of- way. 15.21 Extend Adkins Drive into the site as a 40 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. 15.22 Locate any proposed public street or driveway to align or offset 220 feet from any approved/proposed public street. 15.23 In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. 15.24 As required by District policy, restrictions on the width. number and locations of driveways. shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 16. It is found that if the developer pays for the requested improvements and complies with the conditions set forth in these Findings of Fact No. 15, and all sub -parts, the economic welfare of the City and its residents and tax and rate payers will be protected, which requirement shall be included in a development agreement, a condition of annexation and zoning designation. 17. It is also found that the development considerations as referenced in Finding No. 15 are reasonable to require and must be taken into account, in order to assure the proposed development is designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner which is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing, or intended character of the general vicinity, in order to assure that the proposed use will not change the essential character of the affected vicinity and will insure that the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 7 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR .ANNEXATION .AND ZONINGBY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) proposed uses will not be hazardous or disturbing to the existing, or future neighboring uses, particularly considering the impact of proposed development on potential to produce excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare and odors. 18. It is found that the zoning of the subject real property as (R-8) Medium Density Residential District permits the establishment of single- and two-family dwellings at a density not exceeding eight (8) dwelling units per acre and requires connection to the Municipal Water and Sewer systems and will be compatible with the Applicant's development intentions, and will assure that the zoning is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Single Family Residential. 19. The subject annexation request and zoning designation and proposed development relates and is compatible to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City as follows: 19.1 The consideration of the provisions of the Comprehensive plan and the requirements of the Zoning ordinance assure that the processing of such application is the management of growth with the aim to achieve high- quality development. Enhancement of Meridian's quality of life for all residents is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive plan and the Zoning ordinances of the City to all applications such as the subject application. 19.2 This proposed new growth development will finance public service expansion by the requirement herein that the applicant comply with the requests submitted of the political subdivisions responses within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area submitted in the record of this matter. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 8 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) 19.3 The application is consistent with MeridiaW s self identity. 19.4 The preservation and improvement of the character and quality of Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as a self-sufficient community is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive plan and the Zoning ordinances of the City to the subject application. 19.5 Compliance with the requests of the political subdivisions providing services, assures that community services are being provided for existing and projected needs and that the land use patterns of the City are balanced to insure that revenues pay for services and that the Urban Service Planning Area is visually attractive, efficiently managed and clearly identifiable. 19.6 Compatible and efficient use of land through innovative and functional site design is achieved by applying the criteria of the Comprehensive plan and the Zoning ordinances of the City to the subject application. 20. The property can be physically serviced with City water and sewer, if applicant extends the lines. CONCLUSIONS of LAW 1. The City of Meridian has authority to annex real property upon written request for annexation and the real property being contiguous or adjacent to city boundaries and that said property lies within the area of city impact as provided by Idaho Code Section 50-222. The Meridian City Code § 11-16 provides the City may annex real property that is within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Council may take judicial notice of government ordinances, and FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 9 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) policies, and of actual conditions existing within the City and State. 3. The City of Meridian has exercised its authority and responsibility as provided by "Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975', codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code by the adoption of `Comprehensive Plan City of Meridian adopted December 21, 1993, Ord. No. 629, January 4, 1994. 4. * The following are found to be pertinent provisions of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and are applicable to this Application: 4.A The Goals of the Comprehensive Plan are set forth at Page S and include: 4.1 To preserve Meridian's environmental quality and to make provisions for and improve the total natural environment by adopting City-wide and Urban Service Planning Area policies, which deal with area -specific policies and programs. 4.2 To ensure that growth and development occur in an orderly fashion in accordance with adopted policies and procedures governing the use of land, residential development the provision of services and the distribution of new housing units within the Urban Service Planning Area. 4.3 To encourage the kind of economic growth and development which supplies employment and economic self-sufficiency for existing and future residents, reduces the present reliance on Boise and strengthens the City's ability to finance and implement public improvements, services and its open space character. 4.4 To provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 10 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) 4.5 To preserve and improve the character and quality of Meridian's man-made environment while maintaining its identity as aself-sufficient community. 4.6 To encourage cultural educational and recreational facilities which will fill the needs and preferences of the citizens of Meridian and to insure that these facilities are available to all residents of the City. 4.7 To provide community services to fit existing and projected needs. 4.8 To establish compatible and efficient use of land through the use of innovative and functional site design. 4.9 To encourage a balance of land use patterns to insure that revenues pay for services. 4.10 To create an Urban Service Planning Area which is visually attractive, efficiently managed and clearly identifiable. 5. The requested zoning of Medium Density Residential District, (R-8) is defined in the Zoning Ordinance at 11-7-2 D as follows: (R-8) Medium Density Residential District: The purpose of the R-8 District is to permit the establishment of single- and two-family dwellings at a density not exceeding eight (8) dwelling units per acre. This District delineates those areas where such development has or is likely to occur in accord with the Comprehensive Plan of the City and is also designed to permit the conversion of large homes into two-family dwellings in well-established neighborhoods of comparable land use. Connection to the Municipal water and sewer systems of the City is required. 6. By authority of the City of Meridian under the Comprehensive Plan, a conditional use permit is not required for Applicant to construct and develop a police FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 11 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) station and other uses as permitted in the R-8 zone and compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances on any legal lot within this parcel of land. 7. Since the annexation and zoning of land is a legislative function, the City has authority to place conditions upon the annexation of land. See Burt vs. The City of Idaho Falls, 105 Idaho 65, 665 Ptd 1075 (1983). 8. The development of the annexed land, if annexed, shall meet and comply with the Ordinances of the City of Meridian including, but not limited to: Section 12-2-4 which pertains to development time schedules and requirements; Section 12-4-13, which pertains to the piping of ditches; and Section 12-5-2 N, which pertains to pressurized irrigation systems. 9. The development of the property shall be subject to and controlled by the Zoning and Subdivision and Development Ordinance of the City of Meridian. 10. Section 11-16-4 A of the Zoning and Development Ordinance provides in part as follows: If property is annexed and zoned, the City may require or permit, as a condition of the zoning, that an owner or developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject property. If a commitment is required or permitted, it shall be recorded in the office of the Ada County Recorder and shall take effect upon the adoption of the ordinance annexing and zoning the property, or prior if agreed to by the owner of the parcel. Unless the commitment is modified or terminated by the City Council, the commitment shall be binding on the owner of the parcel, each subsequent owner, and each other person acquiring an interest in the property. A FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 12 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) commitment is binding on the owner of the property even if it is unrecorded; however, an unrecorded commitment is binding on subsequent owners and each other person acquiring an interest in the property only if the subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest in the property has actual notice of the commitment. DECISION ANIS ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, the City Council does hereby Order and this does Order: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and zoning of approximately 20.26 acres to Medium Density Residential District (R-8) is granted subject to the terms and conditions of this Order hereinafter stated. 2. The application is for annexation and zoning of 20.26 acres. The legal description shall be prepared by a Registered Land Surveyor, Licensed by the State of Idaho, and shall conform to all the provisions of the City of Meridian Resolution No. 158. The legal description for annexation must place this parcel contiguous to the Corporate City Limits per Ordinance No. 686. 3. Applicant enter into a Development Agreement, and such Development Agreement shall also include and contain the conditions of and for the real property which provides in the event the conditions therein are not met by the Applicant that the property shall be subject to re -zone and/or de -annexation, with the City of Meridian, which provides for the following conditions of use and development to -wit: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 13 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) 3.1 Any existing irrigation drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project, shall be tiled per City Ordinance. The ditches to be piped shall be shown on the site plans. Plans shall be approved by the appropriate irrigation drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. No variances have been requested for tiling of any ditches crossing this project. 3.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this project shall be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 3.3 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and/or as detailed in site-specific requirements. 3.4 Paving and striping shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance and in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. 3.5 A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all off-street parking areas. All site drainage shall be contained and disposed of on-site. 3.6 Outside lighting shall be designed and placed so as not to direct illumination on any nearby residential areas and in accordance with City Ordinance. 3.7 All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Meridian Zoning and Development Ordinance. No temporary signage, flags, banners or flashing signs shall be permitted. 3.8 Provide five -foot -wide sidewalks in accordance with City ordinance. 3.9 All construction shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3.10 The legal description submitted for the property is correct and places FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 14 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) the parcels contiguous to existing city limits. 3.11 The proposed R-8 zone is in compliance with the current Comprehensive Plan for single family residential. 3.12 The proposed name of Stratford Business Park shall not be approved as part of this application because business parks are prohibited in R-8. Instead it should be named Stratford Park. The park cannot be proposed until the comprehensive plan for the property changes. 3.13 The current draft of the future land use map does show the area as commercial. 3.14 All non-residential uses of the property shall be required to follow the Conditional Use process. Commercial uses shown in the Zoning Schedule of Use Control as `prohibited' will remain prohibited. The requirement for all non-commercial uses to follow the CUP process may be changed at a future date by a revised development agreement if the property is rezoned. 3.15 A minimum 20 -foot landscape buffer beyond all right of way shall be required as a condition of annexation. 3.16 A Development Agreement is required as a condition of annexation. 3.17 The Applicant shall be required to follow through with the platting requirements as per Meridian City Code. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 3.18 Dedicate 48 -feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (Or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 3.19 Construct a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel, located 2 -feet within the new right-of-way. Coordinate the location, elevation and grade of the sidewalk with District staff. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 15 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) 3.20 Extend Watertower Lane into the site as a 40 -foot street section with curb, gutter and 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk within 58 -feet of right-of- way. 3.21 Extend Adkins Drive into the site as a 40 -foot street section with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks within 58 -feet of right-of-way. 3.22 Locate any proposed public street or driveway to align or offset 220 feet from any approved proposed public street. 3.23 In accordance with District policy, stub streets to the undeveloped parcels abutting this site may be required upon review of a future application for this site. 3.24 As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 4. The City Attorney shall prepare for consideration by the City Council the appropriate ordinance for the annexation and zoning designation of the real property which is the subject of the application to (R-8) Medium Density Residential District, Meridian City Code § 11-7-2 D. 5. Subsequent to the passage of the Ordinance provided for in section 4 of this Order the engineering staff of the Public Works Department shall prepare the appropriate mapping changes of the official boundaries and zoning maps as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-21-1 in accordance with the provisions of the annexation and zoning ordinance. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 16 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) NOTICE of FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521 an affected person is a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the annexation and zoning and who may within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the l6— day of Ma c�, , 2000. 007, ROLL CALL COUNCILMAN RON ANDERSON VOTED COUNCILMAN KEITH BIRD VOTED COUNCILMAN TAMMY deWEERD VOTED__�� COUNCILMAN CHERIE McCANDLESS VOTED_ MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE (TIE BREAKER) VOTED DATED: S --1G --00 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 17 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING/BY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005) MOTION: APPROVED:DISAPPROVED: it.1 1 ................ Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. By: / Dated: City Clerk msg/Z:\Wor1c,1M1Meridlan 15360M1stratford Business Park AZ`AZFfClsorder FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW -Page 18 AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONINGBY HOWELL MURDOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/ (AZ -00-005)