Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-03-03 Work Session Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: John Overton, President Anne Little Roberts, Vice President Brian Whitlock Liz Strader Doug Taylor Luke Cavener CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, March 03, 2026 at 4:30 PM The City of Meridian is committed to providing equal access to all public meetings. If you need accommodation, an alternative format, or language assistance to fully participate, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@meridiancity.org 72 hours prior the scheduled meeting. Materials presented at public meetings are subject to disclosure pursuant to the Idaho Public Records Act. Public Meetings of the Meridian City Council are streamed live at https://meridiancity.org/live and can be joined virtually at https://bit.ly/meridianzoommeeting Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Taylor, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the February 17, 2026 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the February 17, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Keziah Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 (ESMT-2026-0028) 4. Chukar Ridge Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2026-0029) 5. Final Order for Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2025-0033) By The Land Group, generally located at the northwest corner of Black Cat Rd. and I-84 6. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Cielo Azul Condominium (SHP-2026- 0001) by Marcel Lopez, located at 3512 and 3526 E. Louise Dr. 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ, PP, MDA (H-2025-0016) by Studio H Architects, generally located at the NW corner of E. Pine Ave. and N. Adkins Ave. 8. 2026-2030 Strategic Plan: Adoption of Focus Areas & Goals 9. Resolution No. 26-2570: A Resolution Establishing the Reappointment of Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor to Seat 1 of the Meridian Arts Commission; and Providing an Effective Date 10. Resolution No. 26-2573: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian Approving the Bylaws of the Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee as Amended Pursuant to Meridian City Code 2-1-1(C)(2) and 2-2- 1(C)(5), and Providing an Effective Date ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT REPORTS \[Action Item\] 11. Discussion to Add Return Payment Fee to Fee Schedule 12. Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Results 13. Ada County Highway District Five Year Plan Prioritization Follow Up Discussion ADJOURNMENT 5:26 PM Meridian City Council Work Session March 3, 2026. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m., Tuesday, March 3, 2026, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Jenny Fields, Todd Lavoie, Caleb Hood, Brian McClure, Jamie Leslie and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock _X_Anne Little Roberts X John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is March 3rd, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: First item up is adoption of the agenda. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I move we adopt the agenda as published. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the February 17, 2026 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the February 17, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 2 of 21 3. Keziah Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 (ESMT-2026-0028) 4. Chukar Ridge Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2026-0029) 5. Final Order for Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2025- 0033) By The Land Group, generally located at the northwest corner of Black Cat Rd. and 1-84 6. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Cielo Azul Condominium (SHP-2026-0001) by Marcel Lopez, located at 3512 and 3526 E. Louise Dr. 7. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ, PP, MDA (H-2025-0016) by Studio H Architects, generally located at the NW corner of E. Pine Ave. and N. Adkins Ave. 8. 2026-2030 Strategic Plan: Adoption of Focus Areas & Goals 9. Resolution No. 26-2570: A Resolution Establishing the Reappointment of Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor to Seat 1 of the Meridian Arts Commission; and Providing an Effective Date 10. Resolution No. 26-2573: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian Approving the Bylaws of the Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee as Amended Pursuant to Meridian City Code 2-1-1(C)(2) and 2-2-1(C)(5), and Providing an Effective Date Simison: First item up is the Consent Agenda. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda, for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 3 of 21 Simison: And, Lizzie, we just approved that -- your appointment -- reappointment on the Consent Agenda. So, you are welcome to stick around, but I know you are getting -- there is a party getting ready upstairs, so -- ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: Okay. There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT REPORTS [Action Item] 11. Discussion to Add Return Payment Fee to Fee Schedule Simison: So, we will move on to Item 11, which is discussion to add return payment fee to fee schedule. Turn this over to Jenny. Fields: Good evening, Mayor and Members of the Council. I don't have a presentation tonight. This item I'm bringing forward is regarding a housekeeping item associated with our fee schedule. So, historically we have a 20 dollar return payment check fee that is included in our city clerk's city fee schedule, but during the most recent update we inadvertently have removed this fee. Upon discovering that MUBS still uses -- oh, sorry. Our utility billing department still utilizes this fee and attaches these fees to -- for our customer return payments. So, tonight there is no action item requested formally by Mayor and Council. We are simply asking to proceed with a public hearing notice to our citizens and bring back a resolution to add this back to our Public Works fee schedule where it aligns with the current operational practices. And I would be happy to answer any questions that you guys have. Simison: Council, questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Jenny, thanks for the update in the memo. Pretty much tracked with along with what you are saying. Just a couple questions now and during the public hearing. I remember like as a kid always -- like you are at a grocery store or whatever, 20 dollar fee for returned checks. Fields: Uh-huh. Cavener: So, it tracks with what I have kind of seen. But can you either tonight or at the public hearing -- what's that 20 dollar fee set to cover? Is that a pass through cost that comes from the banks to us? The bank is charging us 20? Are they charging us 18? Fields: It's a combination. Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 4 of 21 Cavener: Okay. Fields: So, we do have a -- a rate that the bank charges us. It is not 20 dollars. There is also staff time that's allocated to it, because we have to inquire and reconcile with the customers and, then, the utility billing team also has to add this back to the bill. So, there are staff time allocations and administrative costs associated. So, the 20 dollars is not a straight pass through. Cavener: Then, Mr. Mayor, follow up? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Do we have any other -- do other departments encounter this? Like does MUBS probably experience it more than -- than most, but are we seeing this in other departments and are we being consistent how we are charging this? Fields: We have surveyed other departments. The only reason why it was removed, because city clerks and other departments are no longer using it. So, like Parks and Rec no longer uses it. Building department does seldomly use it, but the high traffic one is our utility billing. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, just one last one. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: How do we handle -- or do we encounter situations where fee payers via credit card do a chargeback and say I didn't authorize that and -- and are we enforcing kind of a consistent process if we are not receiving funds for a service that we have delivered regardless of the payment method? Fields: So, merchant credit cards are different than via where we receive a check or direct deposit. So, merchant -- like credit cards. The -- our third-party provider merchant services -- I don't remember the vendor name, but they actually do all of our checks. So, like if a customer said, hey, this is a fraudulent charge, they work with our third-party vendor and get that reconciled. Cavener: Great. Thank you, Jenny. Fields: You are welcome. Simison: Council, any additional questions? Overton: Mr. Mayor, real quick one. Simison: Councilman Overton. Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 5 of 21 Overton: Jenny, I like the idea that we are putting this back in, but whenever we look at a fee I just want to make sure that, as you stated with Councilman Cavener, that when we are looking at this that we are making sure it covers all of our administrative costs. Fields: Correct. We are adding this into our Public Works fee schedule in the future. So, every time we assess each of the fees in the Public Works Department we will be looking at staff allocations is the financial institution -- like our bank is still charging this rate. All of this is going to be calculated. Simison: Any other questions? Okay. Thank you. We will see you back in the near future. Fields: Yep. Thanks. 12. Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Results Simison: With that we will move on to Item 12, which is fiscal year 2025 financial results. Good evening, Mr. Lavoie. Or late afternoon. Lavoie: Good evening or afternoon, Mayor, Members of the Council, appreciate you giving us an opportunity to present to you your fiscal year 2025 fiscal results. The presentation that I have for you today is the same data that I provided two weeks ago. No data has changed since then. So, the data is still the same. The data that I present to you -- again, if you have any questions that I can't answer on tonight, I -- I will work with your subject matter experts. Again these are the results that your departments have executed over the last 12 months for the fiscal year '25. I'm showing you what their actuals did with the budget that you provided us for that budget year. So, tonight what we will do is we will go through the two major funds, which is the General Fund and the Enterprise Fund. Those are the two funds. And, then, the third fund by state statute I must report to you the impact fee results as well. So, we do pull that one little piece out to meet the state statute that on an annual basis your impact fee administrator provides to you your financial results for the impact fee fund itself and, then, we will also talk about what we will present to you at the next quarterly financial update. At any time please let me know if I can answer any questions. So, we will start off with the General Fund. We will start off with the revenues for the General Fund. In total for all the revenues we collected 92 percent of what we projected and we thought we would collect for fiscal year 2025. These are the major revenue sources that we kind of track in buckets. The most important one on this slide is our property taxes. That makes up about 50 to 60 percent of our revenues and we missed the target by one percent. 1.3 to be exact. Licensed permits you can see 78.6 percent. We collected intergovernmental 73.4 and so on. The largest percentage difference that you can see here is going to be at the very very end at 185 percent. This was due to the fact that our investment income is still stronger than we projected and we also got a 1.5 million dollar one time influx from the rural fire district. So, again, that one we don't really have on the budget, but it came in, so that kind of threw us off a little bit there. Largest -- this is the revenue generated for the intergovernmental. You will see we kind of missed the target there. Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 6 of 21 That one is because of the seven million dollar ARPA funding and it's all about timing. So, we will get this money spent, but you will see that we had a budget, but we haven't returned to get the revenue yet. It's -- that -- that's just a timing issue. So, those are your two biggest things from a percentage and from a dollar value. Those are your two biggest variances for the General Fund that I wanted to point out for you. Again, we collected 92 percent. Developments, permit revenues and permit activity throughout this presentation you will see are lower than we projected. They came in lower than we thought they would. So, you see the revenues are lower, the expenses are lower. That will be a recurring theme that you will hear from me. Development actually was lower, hence why we missed the targets. When we go through the revenues, again, the most important revenue streaming for the General Fund is the property taxes. That is our largest, that is our most consistent and we always want to do what we can to protect that revenue source. But, again, we missed the target by 1.3 percent on that one. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Lavoie: Oh, sorry. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Is it okay, Todd, if we dig into this a little bit? Lavoie: Let's do it. Strader: Okay. So -- because I was just kind of curious and I think it's hard to tell where each of them is a percentage and you don't really understand the dollar amount magnitude. So, if you look at it you are saying 82 percent of our projected revenue was collected, is that -- Lavoie: Ninety-two percent. Strader: Ninety-two. Lavoie: From a totality. Strader: So, if you look at the whole thing that is what it consolidates to? Lavoie: Yes. Strader: And out of that let's say eight percent -- that's like a gap; right? Lavoie: Uh-huh. Strader: Then how material are those three items you just mentioned? Like so if -- if I'm looking at -- we think one of the biggest drivers was intergovernmental because of ARPA. Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 7 of 21 Lavoie: Yeah. Strader: What percentage of that eight percent gap does that map back to? I was just -- and if you don't have it that's fine, but I was just kind of curious out of those three items how material are those to that? Lavoie: I do have that data on a spreadsheet -- Strader: Okay. Lavoie: -- and I'm happy to show you how each percentage collect -- or accumulates that gap of eight percent. Have all the data for you so you can see how material or not material it is. I'm happy to do that for you. Strader: Okay. Thank you. Lavoie: Well, thank you. So, stay within the General Fund. I'm just going to touch on some of the larger revenue sources that we talked about. Sales tax. Again for sales tax revenue sharing, again, this is controlled by the state. The state tells us what we get. In this case year over year from '24 to '25 we generated 766,000 -- we didn't generate -- we received 766,000 dollars more than we did the previous year and you can see historically since the 2021 large influx, that is when the State of Idaho changed the legislature and changed the rules in how they did the math. Again, we got a large influx, but, then, you see what happened after the math, they decided to lower our annual income accordingly, so -- but, again, this is the annual -- additional income on an annual basis from the revenue sharing from the State of Idaho. Liquor revenue, which is getting controlled by the state, they give us a proportionate share of the revenue that they collect and manage. This is the second year in a row we have lost money year over year. So, now we are -- two years ago this year we lost 43,000 -- or we generated 43,000 less revenue dollars than we did in 2024 and you can see 2024 generated less revenues than they did in 2023. So, we are around two years of a declining revenue stream for liquor revenue. Again, they tell us what portion we get and so with franchise fees. Franchise fees are controlled by the corporations. We have -- for 2025 we generated 102,000 dollars less than we did the previous year and this is two consecutive years in a row that the franchise revenues from the payments received by our corporations are less than they were the previous year to that. And that sums up the revenue side for the General Fund. Now, we will talk about expenses for the General Fund. How did we do? You gave us a budget. How did we do executing your budget. General Fund in total for personnel we spent 95.7 percent of the total budgetary dollars that you provided us. Our historical average, since we have been tracking this I think for ten years, is 94.1. So, we did better than our historical average. The largest percentage gap that you can see on the screen is 16.7 percent, which is the ComDev team. We didn't quite make the hundred percent mark, but we expected this, because we decided to hold some vacancies and keep some positions open. So, we budgeted, but we said let's not fill those vacancies and the same thing with the Police Department, the largest gap which is 1.4 million. So, when you look at the Police Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 8 of 21 Department the blue bar is higher than the red bar by 1.4 million and that is because of vacancies as well. We have not -- we budget one hundred percent of all your staff members, but if they don't have the ability to fill them, then, we quote, unquote, leave some money behind and that is your largest dollar value gap from a personnel standpoint. Operating. So, for the whole -- all your governmental funds operating, we ended up spending 66 percent of what you provided us for 2025. Our historical average is 80.5 percent and I -- I think there is one bar -- bar graph that you are looking at that stands out. That is your administration group. That is because we were provided five million for the ARPA fund. We only -- we didn't spend it all. We just need time to get that done. It will be all spent by this fiscal year -- or -- because we had to by law, 2020 -- 20 -- December 20th -- December 31 st, 2026, we must have that spent. So, again, that is a timing issue. That is just -- we put the budget in, we just haven't spent it yet. We also had 1.56 million dollar Nine Mile Creek project. We -- we didn't -- we only spent a hundred of that. Timing issue. We just need to be able to spend that. And, then, we also had some transportation projects, half a million dollars there. We spent zero of that. Again timing of that. So, that is why there is such a large variance in the admin. We had large projects that just did not get finished. From a percentage standpoint we also had ComDev. You can see we left a percentage there. Just like revenues, if we don't sell the permits we don't need to outsource the services, so, therefore, we didn't need the services. So, we spent less than what we thought we needed to. So, those are your operating expenses. Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Lavoie: Oh. Yep. Yep. Yep. Whitlock: Can you just give me a sense of what those ARPA funds were dedicated for or budgeted for that we have not yet spent but will spend? Lavoie: Now you are testing me on what the grant team did. Whitlock: I mean that's a chunk of change. Lavoie: The fire -- wasn't the fire department -- Simison: Or is it -- is that the fire -- is this in the biosolids? Lavoie: Well, that would be Enterprise Fund. Simison: Oh. Okay. So, then -- yeah. Here comes Mr. Miles, he can -- fire station -- Lavoie: Yeah. Yeah. So, reimbursements to fire station. So, we need to expend it on our books, so that we can complete the project in total. Yeah. This is the timing thing. We will get this spent for you. Yeah. Thank you, Dave. That now moves us into the other component that we track, which is our capital expenditures. For 2025 the city spent 45.6 percent of their total budget that you provided us for fiscal year 2025. You Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 9 of 21 can see that the General Fund -- we did leave ten million on the books. We did request six of those ten million to be carried forward into 2026. We just couldn't get the projects done in 2025, so we carried to 2026. 3.7 represents -- of the six million 3.7 is for engines, just timing of engines. We need them to be delivered. 1.1 for your Work Day project. This HRMS timecard payroll, we just need timing to get the invoices to us and we will pay those off and, then, parks has one million dollars associated to some parks projects. Timing issues. We will spend it. They asked us to carry the money from '25 to '26. So, again, of that six million will be spent in 2026 for -- to finish up the 2025 projects requested. So, in total your departments for 2025, for the revenue we spent -- or we collected 92 percent of what we thought we would. Personnel we spent 95 percent -- 95 percent of what you had provided us. We spent 66 percent of what you provided us and capital we spent 45 percent of what you provided us for fiscal year 2025 in summary. What does all this mean? For the General Fund, when you take all your revenues and all your expenses, you get to what we call net income. For the General Funds, all these represented here, we increased our General Fund fund balance by 1.6 million. The Impact Fee Fund, which operates on its own, generated 3.9 million. The Community Development a little over half a million of net income. Capital Improvement almost half a million in net income. Public Safety about 266,000. Grants fund is a break even. For every dollar we spend we get a dollar back. So, it should be broken even. Then the General Fund itself we lost 3.6 million. So, when you add up all those numbers it equals a net positive position of 1.6 million dollars to the General Fund. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: And, then, just as we are thinking about -- to the extent that we have had -- I'm always fascinated by the property tax results, just because that shows additional operating ongoing revenue that's coming in above what we projected; right? Understanding there are still other factors that come in. If we have ongoing revenue that comes in, for example, through property taxes, if we budgeted a certain amount and we end up with 1.3 percent more property tax revenue coming in than we budgeted, how does that play into the next budget cycle? As a source of ongoing revenue, then, does that just get added in as we are considering our operating costs and help walk us through that? Lavoie: Sure, Liz. Fair question. So, you do -- you are correct, we did collect 1.3 -- or 1.3 percent more than we thought. That 1.3 is a one-time revenue. Every year the state tells us -- or the county tells us how much revenue you get to collect for property taxes. They don't even look at the past. Well, they do to an extent. They go what is your highest three years of collection. That is now your base property tax. They don't look at whether or not we collected 1.3, because that was so last year. They are going to tell us what our new number is regardless of what last year was. So, the 1.3 is not a factor of what we look at for -- in this case 2027's budget that -- because that was what happened in 2025 or '26. Those might be outstanding -- we don't collect one hundred Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 10 of 21 percent of our property taxes every year. So, those might be outstanding payments from 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 -- because we finally collected them for whatever reason. So, that extra 1.3 isn't ongoing new revenues. County will tell us what the new ongoing revenue is and I present that to you. Your revenue stream is X. Hopefully we collect it. We collect about 99 percent of it. Strader: Right. Lavoie: So, it's usually pretty consistent. But the 1.3 is not a factor, unfortunately, that we get to play with. Strader: Yeah. This always fascinates me -- Mr. Mayor, if you don't mind. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Because out of that 1.3 percent I have always been really interested to see a breakdown of that and understand if -- if there is any component of that that is actually ongoing new revenue or if to your point the vast majority of it is just like one time past collections, people that -- maybe they had a lien against their house or something and so they finally decided to pay their property tax bill or -- Lavoie: Yep. Strader: -- do we ever get into that 1.3 percent and try to get a more granular breakdown to see if out of that amount there is any piece that is ongoing that we can now capture or does it just get averaged in eventually under the -- the formula that we get from the county? Lavoie: It's the math. You are a hundred percent correct. We eventually will build a budget. We will say, hey, county we need 56 million dollars. I'm just making up a number here. We will collect it for you. And they will do their best with an amount of properties that they have on their part -- on their parcel list and collect us 56 million dollars by dividing it into the number of parcels. I think the differences are going to be the late payments and other adjustments, things like that. So, every year they reset the algorithm. They reset it and they go how much do we need? Well, we actually tell them how much we need and, then, they go like I will build you a levy rate and, then, we will collect it on your behalf. Strader: Yeah. Lavoie: Yeah. Strader: Thanks. I just think it's helpful for everybody to understand that, because we -- in the past we have thought, oh, like we didn't budget enough and we are actually collecting more than we thought, so it's like is that a source of new ongoing revenue, Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 11 of 21 because our projections are not aggressive enough and that's not the case, because these are like one-time collections is what you are saying. Lavoie: Separate. Because the county resets our number. They tell us what the number is every single year. You are a hundred percent correct. I appreciate the questions. So, as you can see the General Fund -- these are the results in totality. The General Fund is currently sitting at 99.9 million dollars, to give you guys an answer of what you currently have in your fund balance for the General Fund. With that we will jump into the Enterprise Fund. Following the same format. We will talk about revenues, then, go into expenses and tell you what happened to the fund balance at the end. So, for the Enterprise Fund we ended up at 95.6 percent of what we expected. You can see here the water -- water sales and sewer sales, those are the two most important revenue source for the Enterprise Fund. Those are out ongoing operational revenue sources. Again, they came in higher than we expected by five to six -- five to seven percent. The assessments is where we kind of saw the reduction. No different development on the permit activity. These are all driven by permits. So, it's not surprising to see these lower than we projected. Hence why we didn't quite make the hundred percent mark, we ended up at 95.6 percent. But, again, as you can see the development's lower as expected, because everything within the development community for us last -- for fiscal '25 was lower than we projected. The water and sewer sales, again, those are our most important things that we need to manage. We need to make sure we are coming to you every year with inflationary adjustments, which I think was already -- has occurred for the Enterprise Fund earlier -- a few months ago. So, with that I'm going to talk about some of the major revenue sources. Again, the most important one is water and sewer. Again we generated 1.9 million more this year than we did last year. Again as we continue to add homes that's more additional revenue sources. As you continue to increase the rates by the inflationary factors that's more opportunities. As more people use more water that's income to you as well. So, this is your annualized year-over-year additional income from our water and sewer sales for the Enterprise Fund and we use these funds to cover your ongoing operational needs at the -- in the Enterprise Fund and, then, this is your water connections as we have talked about. Again development is slowing down and you can see that our year- over-year -- not income -- well, it's net loss now for 2025, we generated 1.6 million less than we did in '24 and, then, you can see in '24 we generated six million dollars less than we did in '23. So, if you had the six and the -- the six million, plus the 1.6 million, that's seven to eight million dollars less than we did in 2023. So, this is all just one -- one time revenue sources. That is what the water connections do for your Enterprise Fund. Personnel expenses for the Enterprise Fund. They spent 95.5 percent of what you provided them and you can see almost every department was about 95 percent. Very -- very simple, very clean, very -- you know, great results there. Their historical average is 91.4. So, we are building on making that more -- we are executing that at a better clip every year. Your operational expenses, they ended the year at 89.5 percent of what you provided them. The historical average is 83.5 percent. So, again, better than the historical average. The largest gap in value you can see in the -- is in the wastewater department, about a million bucks. The one million dollars was associated to unspent programs at the plant maintenance and repair section. So, again, we just Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 12 of 21 didn't get to them in time. But, again, that's where the money was left. We asked for the money, we just didn't spend it in those two fields and, then, the utility billing we had four percent more than what you provided us. We are going to apologize. But, again, that was all associated to the postage and mailings of the invoices to our customers themselves. The rates went up. We didn't budget enough in those factors. We are making an adjustment in '27, trust me. But, again, that's what those are from is the paper mailings and all the mailings that we do for those. And that was about 40,000 dollars. We missed the target on postage, mailings and printing and binding and all that stuff. That was operational. I will get to capital expenditures. Your capital expenditures -- your Enterprise Fund spent 49.6 percent of what you provided them. The value gap that we are talking about here is 55 million dollars left. We carried 52 million into next year. So, this is all timing. It takes more than a year to do a lot of their projects, so they asked us to carry 52 million of the 55 million that was not spent in 2025 and they will get those spent in '26, '27 and '28. So, in summary, the Enterprise Fund -- we collected 95 percent of what we thought we would collect in revenues. We spent 95 percent of personnel, we spent 89 percent of operating and we spent 49 percent of capital of what you provided us in 2025. So, what does all this mean again? The Enterprise Fund -- we reduce their fund balance by 27.8 million dollars. The water division consumed 1.9 million. Wastewater consumed almost 20 million. Public Works consumed three million and Utility Billing added 32,000. So, with all that put together you currently have about 84.9 million dollars in your fund balance for the Enterprise Fund and if you recall I mentioned that you carried 52. So, of the 84, 52 is already spoken for. We -- we can't touch that at all so -- but we will get into more of that when we do the 2027 budget and explain how all that works. But you currently have 84.9 million inside the Enterprise Fund. So, with that we will talk about the impact fees. For the fund itself, revenues we -- again, they are all lower than we thought. Impact fees are generated by the development. Every time you pull a permit that's when we get the revenue. So, this follows all the other trends. We did not quite make the mark on our projects, because the residential and the -- development was a little bit lower than we thought. Fire Department, they collected 77 percent of what we projected. They spent a few dollars on some design work in 2025, getting to save before you spend model. We are saving before we can get into that Community Center is what they are kind of building and also Station No. 9. So, you will see some expenses later on, just not right now. They are just doing some design work and things like that. For your Parks Department, again, they collected 71 percent and they spent 91 percent of what you provided them in 2025 for their parks projects and, then, for the Police Department we did not budget any dollars to be spent. They are saving before they spend. Same model. They have that -- I think the next big project is over at the station is an expansion on their training facility I believe. So, again, we are just saving before you spend. So, you will see some expenses in the future on their line items. So, in total we collected 90 -- 73 percent of what we thought we would collect in revenues and we spent 91 percent of what we would expect to spend in our capital. Any unspent monies in capital were carried forward in 2026. So, over the two years you have a hundred percent of what we thought. So, what does all this mean? Revenues minus expenses. We added 3.9 million dollars to the Impact Fee Fund balance at the end of the day when you add up all the revenues, minus the expenses. So, in recap we talked about 2025 actuals, we Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 13 of 21 talked about the fund balances and we talked about the impact fee results for fiscal '25. The next quarterly update you will get from us we will do some like more demographics and statistics and with that I stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: My -- probably my biggest question, which is sort of related to this, but a little bit of a rabbit hole is just do we have a sense yet -- I hadn't heard -- what is the CFP process going to look like this year? Is there going to be an effort to do like a balancing act like we did last year? I know we didn't get to a five year balance, but I was just sort of hoping to -- to hear on that. I hadn't heard from the City Council president or from Finance on what we are doing. Lavoie: Do I need -- John? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Didn't have a chance to speak with you before the meeting started this evening, but looking at a small change from what we did last year in the fact of not presenting the five year CFP from each of the directors, I have had conversations with a few of the other Council Members about looking at having that done maybe every two years or not requiring it every year. We have the same team sitting up here right now that we have had before. I think we -- we both look at this a little bit differently on what this tool is. I think some of that CFP tool was initially designed to be a long range planning tool for our directors and our departments and I have a lot of respect for them using it that way and not using it as a tool we have to completely rely on, because it changes depending on situations. We certainly couldn't have looked two years ago at what we were doing with our CFP and seeing a drone program rolling our way. So, out of respect for our time and trying to make us more efficient this year as we move through the budget process, I'm asking, Todd, to not do the same process that we did last year, but at the same time any questions -- and Todd has agreed any questions that any individual Council Members have on any part of that data is completely made available to them at any time. So, nothing is hidden from them. Anything that's wanted will be provided to them at anytime. We just won't ask for that to be a public presentation. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 14 of 21 Strader: Thank you. I appreciate that reminder. It's tough with the mic, so they turn themselves off now. Respectfully it's not personal. I just want to publicly express my deep disagreement with that approach. I feel that presenting a five year balanced CFP and trying to achieve that and having the departmental presentations from directors has been an important tool that has made our city financially successful and I'm very uncomfortable. So, I just wanted to -- to say that. Again, it's not personal. Philosophies may differ and you are certainly driving the bus, but I don't agree with that at all. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I -- I may encourage us -- I appreciate that's kind of the intention where we are headed right now, but I do think it is worth maybe taking a step back, because I -- I think we, as a team, the body of seven I think have an opportunity to create some consistency when it comes to how we want to look at the CFP. I think my perspective over the last four or five years it's kind of evolved kind of like a river. This year we are going to be really involved, in other years maybe not. I also recognize that departments and our directors, the Mayor and Council, are all using the CFP much differently than it was when it was first launched. So, I -- if -- if the plan is to not provide a presentation this year I think that's -- that's fine. I would expect probably, then, a little bit more thorough budget requests coming into this year, so I understand what these requests look like compared to what I can see in the CFP; right? We all have access to the CFP and there is certainly some data there that's beneficial. The context of hearing from the directors I think are always helpful. So, I just think if we are not going to head down that path directors need to be prepared as part of the budget process to probably receive some additional questions about CFP requests. My recommendation would be is to take a step back and build a predictable schedule and approach about how we want to use the CFP moving forward, so we are all kind of rowing in the same direction and we know this is what we are going to do, whether it's every year, every other year, every five years, every time we have a new mayor or a new council member, let's -- let's build some rules of engagement so that we can plan what that looks like. I think that's important for us, I think it's important for the directors and I think it's important for the -- the taxpayer to have that consistency. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Quick follow up. I spoke with Councilman Cavener before and one of the other influencing decisions for me was that we are the same team of six as we were before. We don't have a new council member this year. This is a Council that's gone through this budget process multiple times now. We are comfortable with this process. Absolutely agree that if we get new members of this Council that's all part of the education process and how this city works and I think it would be very important to go Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 15 of 21 back to that at that time. As, again, I'm not trying to say we won't do this again, just looking at can't we just do this every other year right now and see how that process moves through and how it compares to last year. Simison: Any other questions for Todd on the presentation? Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Just real quickly -- and I like how you portray year over year and this much more than we got last year, which was this much more than we got the year before, but you use the term a net loss when in -- in those bars. Is it truly a net loss or are we -- mean if we just did a line graph would it all be positive? So, I'm -- I'm -- I'm stuck on the on the term net loss when we are talking about revenue. Did we -- Lavoie: So, I apologize if I confused you and I did use the word net loss. From a financial statement I guess I was using net loss from a year over year standpoint. You are correct, you are generating revenue. We are not -- we are in a positive position that the state is still giving us revenues. So, if you look at it from that standpoint, yes, you are net positive in revenue. I use the term net loss over year over year, so I apologize about that. You are generating less revenue than you did -- we are collecting less revenue than we did the year before. I apologize. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: I -- I made that assumption, but I -- Lavoie: Sure. Whitlock: -- when I'm talking to my wife about net loss it's a little different. Lavoie: I apologize about that. Simison: And maybe, Todd, from -- you know, I -- I don't have the numbers on the top of my head, but if I look at three categories, sales tax, liquor revenue and franchise fees -- Lavoie: Yes, sir. Simison: -- net positive, but not as much as we have been because the other two -- we had two and three were down. The third was up a little bit, but not up that much. Lavoie: If you netted all three of them you would be in the positive position of those three. We are just starting to see a new trend with those liquor and franchise -- a new Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 16 of 21 trend for us is we are not making -- we are generating less revenue than we did the year before. That's why I was trying to highlight in those slides, but you are correct, if you netted all three of them I think it was 700,000 dollar profit -- more money in sales tax would offset the losses in the other two. You are correct. You are -- you are still positive when you add the three together. It's just the other two now -- we are not generating as much income as we once were, which is unfortunate. Yeah. Did I get that answer right? Simison: That's -- that's what my -- Lavoie: Yeah. Simison: -- mathematic -- Lavoie: You are correct. Simison: Yes. But when I -- when you get three a-mails from Todd and two of them are negative you are like -- you got to -- you got to look for the positive out of the three. Lavoie: There was one, yes. Simison: There was one. Yeah. So -- Council, any additional questions? Okay. Lavoie: Cool. Thank you for your time. 13. Ada County Highway District Five Year Plan Prioritization Follow Up Discussion Simison: Thank you, Todd. Okay. Next item up is Item 13, Ada County Highway District five year plan prioritization follow up discussion. Mr. Hood. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. If it's okay I think I will just stay here, that way I after get you back up to speed real quick I can take some notes if that's all right. So, again, quick refresher. I was -- myself and Brian were here a couple weeks ago. I had a -- a pretty good discussion I thought about the list of priorities and some of the draft letter that we are preparing to send to ACHD. The 18th of this month is the target, but we do technically have until the end of the month. They said they -- they would still accept it. Did share with you just earlier this afternoon via e-mail. So, hopefully, maybe I will check your e-mail sometime today, but ACHD sent to us last week the compilation of comments they received from their website on Meridian projects and requests from the public. So, we have scanned through those, shared them now with you, just at -- at a very high level summary, nothing that really jumped out that we weren't generally already tracking or already aware of. Nothing that I feel like I need to bring to your attention today, but you have that information as of today, so -- and, then, another thing that's new over the last couple of weeks -- we did get confirmation, we talked a little bit about the Transportation Commission moved the Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 17 of 21 Linder Road overpass project from one down to four. There was conversation -- I think the Mayor brought up, why are we splitting the baby, let's pull it off the list. I did get confirmation from them that -- that project can come off. It's moving forward irregardless, essentially. So, we will move those to the top of the list as with completed projects. I like that comment. So, we will update the -- the list with Linder Road overpass. There is one on Ustick and maybe one other project that was complete this year. I didn't receive any additional comments from any of the Council, so don't really have -- maybe we will just pick up where we left off last time. Those are the kind of the new items. I will --just a reminder there are two lists. So, we didn't really talk about the safety and compliance too terribly much last time. If you want to spend a little time there. If you are good with what the Transportation Commission recommended I think that's fine. The other thing that I have in my notes is we will make some -- in our cover letter we -- we -- we historically put together a cover letter on top of our priority lists, where we will talk about Locust Grove and maybe even Meridian Road and the importance of those corridors, but also this upcoming bridge project and the design that way, too. So, not to bury the lead. We need to get through the priorities. But if you have any other talking points for the letter I would be open to taking those. I typically work with the Mayor on drafting that letter, but if you have anything else you would like us to highlight as we thank them for the work they have done and do and, then, as we, you know, explain that there is still a lot of work to be done and -- and highlight a couple of those projects if you have anything along those lines, again, I will take -- take those types of notes today as well. So, with that if you want to refresh Brian has got the -- the draft from the Transportation Commission up there. Again priority number four. So, if you look at the far left-hand column, 2026 priority draft list priority number four, Linder Road, Over -- Overland to Franklin, that one is coming off. So, anything below that will actually move up one. Other than that, heard some -- I don't want to say conflicting comments, but just no consensus on where priorities should be. So, with that hopefully that -- you all recall that and we can just go from there. Simison: Thanks, Caleb. And, yes, I do everything I can to take all Caleb's comments -- or compliments out of the letter each time -- each year I get it and it kills him. But with that I -- Council, I know that there was some conversation last time specifically around connecting some of the road projects and intersection projects and where some of the -- if Locust Grove is going to be the priority where some of those projects should end up on the list. I think that's my recollection of what were some of the main outstanding items on this list with that information. So, personally, I would love to get that and any other components that you think need to be addressed or modified. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I -- I recall in our last meeting I did think we had some consensus that number one should at least move down a couple of spots. I -- I'm happy, though, with the corridor approach generally and highlighting Locust Grove kind of on this list obviously very clearly in the top ten. So, I don't know if I have a lot of energy around that, but Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 18 of 21 just -- I do recall us kind of nodding along that maybe we were going to reprioritize that one. Other than that I think just generally this approach is fine. I don't know if anyone else has any comments about that one specifically. Simison: Yeah. I think I will share the comment -- I don't remember if this is a conversation with Caleb, but I think it was with the Council President around that one. guess this comes from living in that area. You know, the intersections are what really make these improvements. We know why this one got put up there was because of the bridge. I think that focusing more on the bridge and the letter and getting them to do that correctly, as compared to the road itself, but I think that the Locust Grove and Amity intersection has greater value than this section of road project generally and I think that that's what we have seen -- at least in south Meridian is the roundabout at Victory and Locust Grove has solved a large portion of the congestion issues in that area, but it -- it's now not the road width, it's the next intersection which is creating the challenge. So, I -- I would be supportive of moving this one down to maybe back where it was and reprioritizing the others -- or the intersections in a better way, but focusing on getting them to do the bridge to the appropriate width that we would like to see long term, because it's not that far away. Seven -- if it went back to seven it's not that far away on the list. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I hear what you are saying. I -- numerically there is not a big difference between two and seven. When it comes to how the highway district looks at things there is a giant disparity in priority between two and seven and so that's -- I think that's where my hesitation is. We also recognize I think our conversation two weeks ago is very prudent and fruitful about just the cost of these types of projects and the length of time it's going to take to accomplish them. I would foresee that if we move it to seven we are going to be having a conversation a year from now about moving it back up., So I -- I'm more comfortable leaving it where it is. I -- I don't disagree with the points that you are trying to make, but I -- I do think it is an important priority that -- that needs to remain, especially as -- as Eagle and Amity continues to be built out as a commercial and -- and retail epicenter, all the roadways that connect over to that area are going to continue to see increased traffic. Simison: I think going back -- if that's the case, then, I would move five to number one. would put the intersection at a higher priority than the road widening itself and at least to combine the two -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: -- together. Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 19 of 21 Cavener: I think that part I'm in agreement of. If you want to move five up to number one and, then, the roadway is number two, to me that's -- I -- I recognize the highway district separates them out. I -- I certainly -- I think most people look at them as together. So, I think that would be consistent with what our conversation has been. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I'm good with that. I mean there is two sections of Locust Grove we are looking at and it's a matter of which is which and the more I look at it the more I can flop either way. But the bottom line is I think we have to do the intersections, especially when we are talking about Amity and Locust Grove has to be a higher priority than the road itself, because you just can't -- you are building a road into a four way stop that is dysfunctional if we don't take care of that intersection first. So, I think Councilman Cavener had a very good point, if we move five to the top and make no other changes, with the four coming off -- sorry. I'm good with that change. I'm trying to figure out how to look at this and make the fewest possible changes. I think a lot of work has gone into this. Simison: Getting a little bit of head nods. Any other -- Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I have had the pleasure lately of being at that intersection and so would -- of Amity and Locust Grove and would definitely concur that I think that we can make the biggest impact -- in especially in that area that is growing like mad, if we move that to number one and still focus on getting the bridge to five lanes. Hood: Mr. Mayor, if I can -- Simison- Mr. Hood. Hood: I don't know if you got a head nod from everybody as you are sort of visually polling everyone. I just want to call this to everyone's attention then. Councilman Cavener's comment I think is a valid one. I really like grouping the intersection in the roadway on Locust Grove and -- and Amity there and that also keeps the Locust -- what is currently the second and third listed project still together. I just want to call it out. It does, because the top three especially matter two and seven and all -- but it does push your Fairview and Locust Grove out of the top three, which is the ones. So, just -- we only have three and everything -- there is a lot of priorities. I just want to state that, that -- that bumps it out of the top three, so -- Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 20 of 21 Simison: I have got so much faith that their -- their new impact fee numbers are going to give us top four -- Hood: Okay. Simison: -- to work on anyways. Hood: So, if -- if -- can I just restate it, then, so everybody's tracking? Is that okay, Mr. Mayor, if that's where this seems to be headed or I can wait if there is more changes? I'm just going to read the top seven as I have them listed. If there is other changes we can -- so, I have got the new number one, then, is Amity and Locust Grove, that intersection, which is currently number five. Number two, then, is what's currently number one on the 2026, Locust Grove Road, Amity to Victory. Number three, then, is Locust Grove, Fairview-Ustick. Number four is Fairview-Locust Grove. We are going to skip the next project, which is Linder Road overpass. Number four, then, becomes number five, Victory Road, Locust Grove-Eagle Road. And, then, number six is Ten Mile, Cherry, Eagle-Overland, and so on and so forth. Does everyone -- does that track right? Simison: Yeah. And -- and we can even point out that but for them talking about this bridge it wouldn't have been number two. It wouldn't have been brought up on our list and it's on their future -- you know, I am still not understanding, you know, their -- how their rationale for them doing this work. So, we can blame them for -- for how this ended up because of that conversation. But we are not really -- other than really adding that one item that was in the future into that list, everything else already has a design row year essentially moving forward on these, so it's not like we are really -- they may not be in our top three, but they are still generally moving forward. Hood: Is there anything else for the letter then? Obviously we will talk about Locust Grove and some -- some of that in the cover letter. Is there anything else that anyone's hoping that we address? We have it down pretty well I think. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything in particular, so -- and then -- oh, Brian might have something. McClure: Mayor, Council, before you move past the five year plan just a reminder. I get a lot of comments from council persons about the community programs and the projects on that list. So, if you -- if you guys have preferences this is the time where ACHD likes us to move this forward, not sort of outside of it. Hood: I will just also mention -- I don't know if you want Brian to scroll through, but there were quite a few that were added -- 47 through 58 were added this year, so, you know, their home is currently at the end of that list, but maybe even particularly scanning those to see if any of those tend to rise up to be something that's in a top ten say. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Work Session March 3,2026 Page 21 of 21 Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Caleb, when people are done looking at this could you just go back to like the top ten of the community program priorities, please. Hood: I will just say if you want to look at the new ones that were added and the top ten kind of simultaneously it is in your packet, you could pull that up, too. So, we can't do split screen or picture in picture here, but if you want to pull that up and -- you do have access to that, too. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I think that -- I think we have got this one pretty close at least on the top ten. can appreciate the -- the new ones. I just think if something's actually number 40 or number 50 1 think that the chances of them taking it seriously in the near term are -- are low, but I -- I was happy to see kind of a continuation of this. I appreciated the elevation of the Goddard Creek and Wild Goose project at McMillan and Linder. That area is a complete mess. So, that -- that makes a lot of sense to me. I know that the Black Cat railroad crossing has been a huge priority for us just given the pedestrian situation of the school children. I -- I know it's not efficient for them to do this, to, then, eventually redo it when they widen the road, but I think it's just so important from a safety standpoint. I support that. I think this makes sense to me at least at this point. Simison: I'm getting all head nods. Okay. Hood: Thank you. Simison: All right. Well, we will get these transmitted to ACHD forthwith. Thank you, team. Appreciate it. Council, we have reached the end of our agenda. Do I have a motion? Overton: Mr. Mayor, I move that we adjourn the work session. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 3 / 17 / 2026 ATTEST. CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK w IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the February 17, 2026 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session February 17,2026 Page 26 of 26 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:40 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 3-3-2026 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 3-3-2026 W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the February 17, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council February 17,2026 Page 17 of 17 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Perhaps maybe you and our Council President can discuss the next time you are together -- a matter of training or good conversation with Council in light of a workshop session on -- sorry. I did not realize my mic is off. It's not lost on me that there has been now I think a couple times in the past 12 months where at least the Council thought that they were approving and what was ultimately approved and came forth. We are not in alignment and I know when we had kind of our first -- I think we had a -- an education session in December. My goal is to get good feedback for where we -- where we as Council need to improve. So, whether that is staff level feedback, whether that is staff-to-staff on things that they need to make sure that they are capturing or whether it's things that we need to be capturing in our motions, to feel really comfortable that what we are voting on, what we are proving, is actually what's going to come forth. I don't begin to know what the right approach is, but I -- I see this as -- as now repetitive issue that is said twice in the past 12 months and it makes me at least pause of where are we erring that's allowing this to continue and what do we need to do to resolve it so it stops. Simison: Okay. All right. Anything else under this item? Okay. Then do I have a motion? Overton: Mr. Mayor, move that we adjourn. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Motion -- motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.47 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 3-3-2026 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK w IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Keziah Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 (ESMT-2026-0028) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2026-014669 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Boise,Idaho Pgs=5 vbailey 03/04/2026 08:36:10 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Keziah Subdivision Electronically Recorded Water Main Easement Number: 2 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only Record Number: H-2026-0028 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 3rd day of March , 2026, between L.C. Development, Inc., an Idaho corporation ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"). WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities,together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including,but not limited to,buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences,trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims ofall persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: L.C. Development, Inc. Allen Lee Centers, President STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) f This record was acknowledged before me on ��VJ ��/ 2026,by Allen Lee Centers on behalf of L.C. Development, Inc., as President. Notary Stamp Below 1111111111N/!!�� CAL,yC Notary Signature G �pRYPUB�., % My Commission Expires: o �'3o MY COMMISSION . EXPIRES 8-16.2030 ; si''•�Of 10P•'•�`��. O1ii11118�\\\\,\ Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 3-3-2026 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 3-3-2026 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3-3-2026 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Exhibit A Legal Description City of Meridian Water Easement Keziah Subdivision, Lots 59 and 60, Block 1 An easement being over a portion of Lots 59 and 60 of Block 1 of Keziah Subdivision, as shown in Book 88 of Plats on Pages 10049 and 10050, records of Ada County, Idaho; being located in the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a brass cap monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 7, from which a brass cap monument marking the southeast corner of the NE '/4 of said Section 7 bears S 0026'24" W a distance of 2649.63 feet; Thence along the easterly boundary of said NE '/4 S 0°26'24" W a distance of 987.76 feet to a point; Thence leaving said easterly boundary N 89033'36" W a distance of 111.90 feet to a the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 89033'12" W a distance of 27.00 feet to a point; Thence N 0°22'43" E a distance of 5.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89033'12" W a distance of 9.48 feet to a point; Thence N 0°26'48" E a distance of 11.28 feet to a point; Thence S 89'33'12" E a distance of 9.69 feet to a point; Thence N 0°26'48" E a distance of 3.72 feet to a point; Thence S 89°33'12" E a distance of 26.79 feet to a point; Thence S 0°26'48" W a distance of 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 646 square feet and is subject to any easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS oNP` LA No Land Solutions, PC �� \S T sG February 3, 2026 � 0 0 o �'Vz I 3 I 8 _ <1 9T F 0 F \�P 5� 0N W NP' Keziah Subdivision Meridian Water Easement Lana Surveying and Consulting �� Job No. 23-66 Exhibit B CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER EASMENT - EXHIBIT AN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF LOTS 59 AND 60, BLOCK 1 , KEZIAH SUBDIVISION 615 E. FAIRVIEW AVE. - 7 8 r\ I � O Q E. LOCUST VIEW LN. J N @ I O I I W I s 9 '. ICD 1 -CD I I I I ^ N e l C) I I I I g 0 mm f—22 I j I CY))OJ I dcn I `�rds I I I I I r3 01 I I I I CDY .{ i �b� i i i • I I I I 1 PROPOSED BUILDING L7 � 1 � J I I Z' so I ' I �3N �wzL3 ..... ............. PROPOSED N89'33'36"W mBUILDING EASEMENT POINT OF o BEGINNING I N� I C.)s AREA=646 SF ;1 e I _j I LINE TABLE R a 1 LINE LENGTH I BEARING 'I / ow Lt 27.00' N89'33'12"W I � L2 5.00' NO'22'43"E L3 9.48' N89'33'12"W I ', L - - - - - - - - L4 11.28' NO'26'48"E � • L5 9.69' S89'33'12"E �r I L6 3.72' NO'26'48"E L7 26.79' S89'33'12"E L8 20.00' SO.26'48"W E. PINE AVE. ��AL LA/y0 S 1/4 S�TF/ Q L O 1118 Lan ?1utions a- � Land veying and Consulting 0, 20' 40' $0' Y h OF E.A 231 5TH ST. T� W Nr� MERIDIAN.ID 83642 rr (208)288-2040 (2 08)288-2557 fax www.landsolutions.biz d08 No.4 2 w IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Chukar Ridge Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2026-0029) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2026-014668 Boise,Idaho Pgs=5 vbailey 03/04/2026 08:36:10 AM Project Name or Subdivision Name: CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Chukar Ridge Water Main Easement Electronically Recorded Water Main Easement Number: 1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more Than one easement of this type See instructionslrhecklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only ESMT-2026-0029) Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 3rd day of March -2026between CHUKAR RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION., INC, ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); VJERFAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and VvMREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of the operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right ofaccess to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and n-ointenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings,trash enclosures, carports, sheds,fences,trees. or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of®way and easement hereby granted shall become part of,or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. EACH PARTY shall be responsible for its own acts and omissions and shall not be responsible for the acts and omissions of the other party. With respect to any claim or action arising out of any performance under or pursuant to this Agreement, each party shall only be liable for payment of that portion of any and all claims, liabilities, costs, expenses, demands, settlements, or judgments resulting from the negligence, actions or omissions of itself and its employees. Grantee shall further cause the Easement Property herein granted to be restored to a reasonable condition upon completion of work within the Easement so as not to cause any unreasonable erosion, washing or other damage to adjoining land of Grantor. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: CHUKAR RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. I h7i Chri ina Goo . President STATE OF�+B*44 ) ) ss County of This record was acknowledged before me on �3"u' °date) by rk (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Chukar Ridge Homeowners Association, Inc. (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: President (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below C MEGAN E GUINN Notary Public,State of Nevada Appointment No.20.4593.01 Notary Signature: IeMyAppt.Expires Aug 28,2028 My Commission Expires: �1�j 2aZ Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 3-3-2026 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 3-3-2026 STATE OF IDAHO, } : ss. County of Ada } This record was acknowledged before me on 3-3-2026 {date} by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Exhibit A Water Easement August 6, 2025 A portion of Lot 38, Block 2, Chukar Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 122 of Plats at Pages 19397 through 19400, records of Ada County, Idaho located in the Southeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Chukar Ridge Subdivision from which the Center-East 1116 corner of said Section 32, coincident with the Southwest corner of said Chukar Ridge Subdivision bears South 00034'39" West, 629.43 feet; thence on the northerly boundary line of said Chukar Ridge Subdivision, coincident with the southerly boundary of Gander Creek South Subdivision No. 2 as filed in Book 127 of Plats at Pages 20497 through 20501, records of Ada County, Idaho, North 66'26'32" East, 25.13 feet; thence leaving said northerly boundary line, South 00°00'00" East, 68.52 feet to the northerly City of Meridian Sewer and Water easement line as granted by Instrument No. 2020-020189, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on said northerly easement line, South 65008'27"West, 26.16 feet to the west boundary line of said Chukar Ridge Subdivision, coincident with the west boundary line of Southeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of said Section 32; thence leaving said northerly easement line on said west boundary line, North 00°34'39" East, 69.48 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1,610 square feet, more or less. End of Description. �\pNNL LANs E HSF 0 11 79 0 rF OF \0 �? YM McGA�'� Page Iof1 GonderlGreek South 5ubdivisionl No.2 z 4 Point of Saginning (NA Corner Chukor Rldga Sub.) �43 N a. r 4� ro rr , � rr sr � rdr �r to IM 3: C � Jo;nt School I Diatr�ot No. 2 i 'v Mock 2 Chwkor Ridg0 CID �tJf�divl�le� 11 City of Morldl4n gewer ond W4t®r Emmmt 1 A lnat, No, LA 292A�A28AG j j I I y1�9 N � 11779 � I I .,A oar OF MCC C-E 1/16 (S,w, - - - Corner Chukor scale" 1"_ �}' Ridge Sub.) 15 30 - 60 P:\Cand.r Cre"5o„in No. 3 21-577�aw �Z157p-Qll�;,o Wo1or-Eoev.d. 8/15/70 2,9:55.74 AM IDAHO Exhibit 8 Job No, Water Easement 21-572 SURVEY 89IewI AHO03704 Sheet No. BO16E,IOA310 83704 (205)849.8570 A portion of Lot 38, Block 2, Chukar Ridge Subdlvlson located GROUP, LLC In the SEt/4 the NE1/4 of Section 32, TAN., RAW., OX, Dwg, Dote CRY of Meridian, Ado County, Idaho. 8/9/2025 W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2025-0033) By The Land Group, generally located at the northwest corner of Black Cat Rd. and 1-84 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 24TH, 2026 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: MARCH 3R', 2026 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 3 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0033 LOTS ON 40.29 ACRES OF LAND ) IN THE I-L ZONING DISTRICT ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL FOR MOGUL INDUSTRIAL PARK ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT SUBDIVISION NO. 2. ) BY: THE LAND GROUP ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on February 24th, 2026 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING MOGUL INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN THE EAST t/2 OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE I WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2025, HANDWRITTEN DATE: November 24th, 2025, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 1 of 16 by JAMES R. WASHBURN, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 3," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated February 24th, 2026, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 2 of 16 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 3rd day of March , 2026. By: Robert E. Simison 3-3-2026 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 3-3-2026 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 3-3-2026 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 3 of 16 Exhibit A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT a a H O HEARING 02/24/2026 Legend �e DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council Area of Impact i= City Limits ' FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner Analysis nnapoli@meridiancity.org - 1 SUBJECT: Mogul Industrial Park No. 2 ------ _.. FP-2025-0033 LOCATION: Generally located at the northwest corner ' of Black Cat Road and I-84(Parcels: _ S1216141821 and S1216131201) in the east half of section 16,T.3N.,R.1 W. MET e � I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final Plat consisting of 3 buildable lots across 40.29 acres in the I-L zoning district for the Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: The Land Group-426 E. Shore Drive,Eagle, ID 83616 B. Owner: Clay Sammis-491 N.Main Street,Ketchum,ID 83340 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plats for the Mogul Subdivision(H-2025-0006)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B- 3C.2. This plat incorporates the second phase of the Mogul Subdivision that was entitled during the ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2-FP-2025-0033) Page 4 of 16 preliminary plat. The number of lots(3) for this phase did not increase, and the landscape buffers did not change. In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase, and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Since there is no change to the number of buildable lots and no open space is required, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 05/01/24) Preliminary Plat { r Wgod lnausrriai Park SuhdimsionCM 17 tgl _ - mow - __ 4 rw�•.c_�. J `••. R 84 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 5 of 16 B. Final Plat(dated: 11/24/25) Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision Phase 2 Located in the Egad 1V2 of Satios 16, Township 3 North,Range'I♦Nest,Boise Idaiian, �—• C ty of Meridian,Ada Coldly,Idaho _a..,.- -0- e iax_.im..as_i.ww lit rsx 1 .�.�... ... ! �g r � I Edl 5 Q 3 ■Y WITAr LrlTiY F r uE LEKTi LW MUM t I tort �sliul�rr o_. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 6 of 16 FuaI rut Ter Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision Phase 2 aYi�r�r-lu HYlM1ri\rw VY.��wNll Ytl+[i _. r�ir� � NQnOridu rMM,�0..IrRWi4Y.�nRW Rr94�81��IIrP�R I,�I,■P.IOPFw�lA _ n ea�Rs�r�r.x or��r-iec.rR�rer#;rr�.��n r. m..�. x�r�uriu• vr._remn�®gym u.iw•._._r�.acn ��Kr•Fr YR.A RMrI uuu a"- I�rG�ilrlrx;MRMi�II^,.un..u�w ar n;rc�.rrui ��x.n r.r sr w_.I�AYO�R+VpAP>6AIR •as r'44S�GM4M8(VT!fiTW WS.kvA1Fi0lFPRr�R[k n®i.�u I�aWrra�.a¢IYI: nRq WI.e!f!•pP�4R Slr� INl1YlIMIfM VY.SM II MI: nrl i•nw asrr�ci m��.oa w niin ��7.TM rxE ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 7 of 16 Rom.WL,.r Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision Phase 2 Aid■11.Ergs�trY7 hnlra.K Cx.A..n.Nr GwI or m tm"i� xV• .�ti App-CY 4d THE LAR um JiTif� Ya��sa. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 8 of 16 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 11/24/2025) ` i h i iNE p-�Y hiw eralMrk _ LAM I i� r pYINrt MSMgq I �Up rr Y ------------- .-------------------7 rYtW mudw-mnA 1 1 �r 1 - - 1 1 w.rw wrr.ie.. 1• i �'-� 1 p---- 7lwr tt n ., L-----•-----------J.-a-------------------� Lsldacwpe NeNm B,w wetul l.P.Ph—t IL C3 I p e�iuY�.Illf� •p w L7Y A RO — r -----i�.�----- - 1 1-----•--L- __ I 1b.UM a.--------------- - _ -7-- _---•trait L------------------ ti .----- - 1 .. 1a16cape Ore�ew '�'""� ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 9 of 16 1 1HE 1 L✓4R 1 1 CROP 1 1.BAD 1MM w.:. 1 N 3 �w�.. I � i 1 ti Y �{r Grand Mogul Grfue Landscape-Eat 6 0 Landscape Roles; ElaluI L.1.9eRt m �•nmxoi iio-oxumuaKrwurua � 1 0 h1r_ 9an1 OCPUYBNiaONLxY tlli � '."_xt�w irxwa�n�uio�.fxwx�xu 'r•�••_ 1 C 9 _ 1 � 1 o1 Rp a I ".T I i •r--- Grand Mogul Grave Landscape•WeslL L1.Q1 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 10 of 16 HA.D 000 Mup )900 Gr30 too 114 Corridor Kolar Wesi tanciTzap L- 140 Landscape Notes LeWd: ca 0 4D S- .140 75 184 Uffldipr Buffer West LamiscapD L1.02 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 11 of 16 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division 1. Applicant shall meet all terms of the approved annexation and preliminary plat(H-2021-0064; AZ—DA Instrument#2022-082504; H-2025-0006); applications approved for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of City Council's approval of the Mogul Subdivision on August 12', 2025, in accord with UDC 1I- 6B-7, in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by The Land Group, dated 11/24/2025, included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#11: Include the recorded instrument numbers for the covenants, conditions, and restrictions. b. Note#12: Include the recorded instrument numbers for the ACHD sidewalk easement. c. Modify Plat Note#7: to include the City of Meridian in the language for approval. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by The Land Group, dated 07/23/2025, included in Section V.C, shall be revised as follows: a. All required landscape areas shall be at least 70% covered with vegetation at maturity, with mulch used under and around the plants in accord with UDC 11-313-5N. Please provide vegetation calculations for the landscaping along Grand Mogul.A copy of the revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. b. Sidewalks,walkways and pathways shall include dedicated crosswalks at the intersection for all streets along W. Grand Mogul Drive with changes in color,markings,materials, texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-28,Crosswalks). c. The 20-foot landscape buffer along W. Grand Mogul Drive shall be installed with the subdivision improvements prior to a building permit being issued. 6. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes. Contact the Meridian Postmaster,Matthew Peterson, at 208-887-1620 or Matthew.W.Peterson(kusps. ov for more information. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 12 of 16 7. Future development shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table I1-2C-3 for the I-L zoning district. 8. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. 9. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 13 of 16 B. Public Works Wasteralcr + n kd, tnse A&m&ble lm site semokEs Seater shed y [drmoted PM40a Sec apWim6un Sewer L7tl.l'3 + WRPF 0 llmrtg Gal'anm + Propd CGn2.5ler& Yes with It M kbmtcr F1arVFacft Plmm + Irrp3Et%?E3nCV r6 T i P bllik W.A.SkL C�If1dt10Rs Whoor + txa�tQyyyp�r WaterMalahleaLSrt sew i PresmR gum + fWarr z�LimaLe fd P jea r m applltkon ( arrfRT. + WaL�CbLality Nmo + Pruj-d Consistent Yes with Vlaler Master Plan Flone 9I7T ST IFL['€t NDITLONS: I. [3Lr drrLs nul allum 10 !.iain.LJ fi",if kar�Lr is m.,5.1 uTM Yr 12". 2. lky requires that all serviues c oFrt6e xhb pmLE to sde.Please Lrie Lim shah fur 1xrffi Dire 3erriQ and Wafer„nviu Yh amid tappmmg the main m the nKKL 3_ Flwidr the nxluirnrl 2{F'LiaaLariTrl fix 1F>L stub.I�I�ax�rrorL ulLiad a rvLimr�ur5'�L the bhvN ull'bUL lf'Li Prufiz mL €ZNGRAL(TWIDLTLONS: I. %WWLary seam'Le Lo Lhis duvuhyrm ml Li available v ech:nd m urexisbrq nzmLx arkja L Yr Ore de4+6rprrrart.The apP:r=L sha:l:n•Lall maim Mr and Llm u6h Lhis.iLdxHvLs m,4 ggxlimnt shill cc ffdffsnle maim mw arxL T amr,w:th the Pul Wr>L3 lk.Tar nx-rit,arsd rmima-Aa d fLarm o ea.wumnLKformymainslFcLLscny4wredLupnmrm&mrAcL. MirmmmnL;L+vawrr.auywrn mis rs dame fuel,ifaiver lion Iulr ul'lxpu hi sub grade a lea than Ors Fed tlum ahenude TmLEenils shall 1x U> d in CunliRnsLrce iiF €.dy iif lldwkbm IhblK Vkwkm Ilelxrbmmts StmKLwd 9fmClfxAiL=. 2. Wafer.�'x Yr this wie a avai Lrarle via exteRS mFmimigg mains arrant Lu the de IL{rm rrl. The aMlEm AhAl he n5prffmiT[ to inrA-A wAm rmim to naL tl� This dv ekrpmmL cumbiruk nvirL Kuz and Fnmxq with PuMx%mim ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 14 of 16 3. All irprrnemrmLs rdAed b public life,safely ald heavl sdall he owWlebd prig Irr=Lqlmxy 4 rf the sfrchnseL Whom aplavl�ed1vy(hr€Sly lEnpwu,am oworreLy pug a pefmnlarue savety for sasdLik3mvwmnrisin4olew4htadnCityllkg esigns ern Lhe final platasseLfc&m13X' 11 5C 3E1. 4. 1.]pom im uilAian of the Lmxiccimg and pion to in qg fim by Pl: irg Dgxwlrnr a staff,ffw app KmAsdall pnrmka wrimmcetiri-y orcurlpletirn asswlforth in UIX:11 3Il 14A S. A lelle a— tnrcwdi saoetym the mmuY of 110%rill he reyrmed f4w al]inanp1&e ferain& Lzu Ti&xwmucK,rmommwd xmpimrg prim YrnignahoxunLhefaultplaL d. The City of WridLm requsm%VLd Ore i rwrrr paA Aith the City a pert w snout}'m the anumL of 125%of Ole WW1 L)mNtrmtkm LvrxL for all manr{tlete sewer,wapr nFraNuuA n.prior Ln final platsilgmk�Then suety will be%+ lied by a line iWrnarste4ondePmniL3edbyOreirkrxrhiLhe €Sty. The applicant skull be retpired di erne mtn a Dl eloprnarl4uety Ag nenen xadr Lhe€:iy of Mmcban The many LPL be IN"ed in Lim Iiwm arm irrevocable ILUff ofnediL,cedr LIT d or bond.Applicant mcm file an apry]i= m f4w xi.oely,wtd dl un be fwmd Ln tlse {;rrrmmmdy DeLsdrr mmj weirxite. please amtaet ]mill DevelopmWL `Erviue litr rrawe infammbrn aL 1i117 2211_ 7. The€dy eIrMerkilim nscpmr HrJ the owmer p osl ko the OLy a uvrariy.army m the amulurt of 21l%4if the Lots]arsb u uan cost Rr all upmplieled eerier,ail wme mfsaetruchre Rr a durw am orbxu years Thee v ty arxxmL Will he vu-ified by a lim k9n foal mat imvicing pnrnded by Lhe owner La Lb!€'ry.The suety can he pmt d in the FL.rrn or an meLnuahle LctLer od until,gash deprnaL or bmL hpoicmmt msst File am aWlimwm Rw mmuty. which can he fnmd an the €lmmmny❑nekrprnmL 17XTWtn L weh%he. Please cvnL WL I: d lkxxLagwrrenL.L' x Rr more mRrmoliL al Rli7 2211. R. In the e L HaL an appbMEL zmU4 r 4w r cmmut crwiplae nm Ills,mm sdk-Ly:a 3 Hors health mQow weres,prwrLaCAyI-kpreesripWmetmOrefirmplatardsorF"irLotw,<zgKnV-y.axwely agreemmot may be appnveed ass set Roth in I DC 11 51'-W. 4. A1rpliLirl sdWI be mL}Lioel Lin pay PUb]iu Vi'urlls develolmtml plml Leview,and.zffe;hi Lyrrn mmpBzhon fees,m detetmied tkmrrrg the plan review pnruras,prim•Irr dw imamwe ors plmc up+pnnral lame_ Id.It skull he the 7egxVribihty arrthe app]iL=L Lei ensloe Thal all develrgrm siL kmwes corTly wrlh Lhe Arno it with DwAtilities Aci mid the Fair 1 rrremg Am 11.J410Lcart4all berespo bk!fix applff;dAm and axQliasscx with any%. LtHraMM PemLLmgthal may be nxpnffed by tare Array Orp%of lkgi e. 12.Devdupe sdra Il Hw nde naikrnL lmaUw wdh the Wrwhan Post{Xli�. 13.Allgsltiggol-Ore site shall bepefolmed in cLanfiwwu ism aiLh kk'l'11 1 41i. Id.€.lwgmLYHrn tnLm lIN shall be sathoritled La Ore lfeHdim IhrikWig Depmimnt fur all bLdkLmg path reueirmg enEjrrxrnrl bwkF31L wire hooting waukl sd aLL+p fill nwberial. 15.The engffK%x skull he reymred to Lwtify Lha Ore sheet c ntedme elevations are set a rninirnan aif .3feetabunx&eh3gresaest6lischedpeAgrxmxlw-.strreleL�IivL This ixwsr flml Lhe hawNn elesadm of Ore Lrawl sgrares ofhrnxs is al"I Rmt above. I16. d airxyge faLility wlOmr Ines project that cLr rxrl fall Lmoir Ore jra-iscdio�aoon irfan irri�liun LhstrLLt nr A{:r][}. The&sagoa{girraTshallponille celrricaliL,.r Ilul Hie Farrliursh�ekernmstalled in auuxt3;lrce vnth the slP3la+ved tlr98t plae<This ceV Baal iLm will be rapier heMm a ctwulkab!cif 4KxmTKm-y Ls asLred firr arey shodomes ro ffiin Lbe probe t ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 15 of 16 17.At the wmpk"m of Me pr*M OLe applEw %haul lre Lwptmialde W suhrLaL a¢ad t3newmp per Lhe Cily ur Knidian Ai1cCAD qmtLvxk The%jem drwmmipmusshemDm%cdualq=rYod LriurbiLbeisswyhulrracwufiir�ivLlrrwmpumyfuaMsb1WWMwithintbepngiLL I.H.Street Iighl plan regwrerLrsnts am laud m maNm 6 7 urthe hq�mveoert Fiumlvah fur gbrbK Lighlmg(7rlasl-w Tr mLlamcAyAffp�ubk rwe3rsa+grx?d-272). All street liglr[x shall be m+4a]U aL dw ICIYQ's LXPx . LFimd L1Lwigo slWl 1r mhr3 iLiwl as part urLbL dnektpmarrl pdmr sct Glr apprmal,wbkl=L 7XILuk the bLyirn of any i'rmlmi'shed IELLs. nL 4AN3lbxltLr-s work mml materials sLaO ctmfum W OLe B?W' and Ole (Yy nl' Meridian 9u pimms" SpaecC"ilms w Hre MWC'.(Imitaet the ViLy udAlarkrm TrarrpcelaLwws axe I blrLy{btedU6ZLM at H99 55W Fiw mr4w oaim 4m the rn mic s orerlsdm sbe t ILuhting. 19.The apphi=t shaO rLruvide earerrrert(s}Fier all p Ub]iL wdbna.: er rraim ixls k ttrpulsbc right ur way(m ILxle all walir serum•%aml.liydm tom). The Baswaffft wxkhr nball he 20 rnet wvle FR a singleLbbLp,ar101LLutwidefuhwLL The czcerrrrs%lol11xlthealetbo�vulhepIs.hAoLher 6mficaLdciw%iLithLpLatpn)LossuNhglhL City 4krMbitl 'samuLrti.FLT sThcmorivd331I be graphically dLTiebe3 Lm the plat for mfeema p mp ms.SLbrrrt m.taaAc I eaxstre d(m the firm available ffir liblK Were,a kWJ deLTil"m prepaid by m l3Lbo ljcemx dPntke mud l amL 9tm-,L)iTr,whmLb nau im*wc the am urik czKmxmI(mm"LA I:XI Olirf A}wd w It112-x 11'm V vuLh Irtssings and dzLnD 3L{tru&A I-AI Dllrr ii}ru m-vicw.ikAh ribibLs cram)hL sealml.sigrAdmmldaWLLbyzPnthemm al ladSLrmpw.IX)NOT R--.(Y)RD. hdLLanoWb3Lie plat mfamrKmE thm dcoxmnk All eLrvvrens nart be LaLlmrtliL3,review L and apl� d prior iLF Kip==vrthe Emil plat 1Ly the€:fly EZ07 ee. M.Appli=L shall tre respxatsible Fir apprhLWm n and am plraroe wrlh a 1.KPDUS pmrwabg IhdL may be recpdred by the l:n{irLimwr"ILrqkm-tmpn Agtawy. 21.Any wills 1lsaL will rmt uKsti x Lo be wed naea be pntperly ahnra3urnd aoaatrrE bn ldilwr Well €.vmbi rtitm SLmduih Ruin aLin miKksicd lyr The Ida bo 1]4larbrerl ur Wawr Brmircm(I11W R)L The Devilgr.Ownrer,trpmrKmAI;jigjrwr,4WIpnTvideasl Wnwnl.w3irssirgwhetlreLbemae amy eaisuni well,m LF&dnvlLgrrLurt,axl if ma,hua-They will rn LTnm to he used,ill IMLLni& ri wd ul'Lhur aKm&mnenL IF wells are Ne Ix Wmrj3r m.a IF&pmjwx vane or thew nprnEmbGre naLA L gKiwt flw-IDW R{wu mil waux Prggmu m%s:I iLm(barn%imw,13y�lugist 2116 2K7 •1972)[WI-{U any VMKk rs&Pne NO de<nrmdusrm an aLir7igg well[even if it es hehnred Ihal 11m wxll is less Ihm IS B deep}.Proof Lrfrw®ri wiim v6M IWR meal be ralrrrithed to Ire lily prier to my•rork breimg Liowo to deoommbda Ire xdL FLrlom to Lawrn=katr witr IDVI'R may rnsk in sMitinal work and cLpeose in de miisrirr irr wr< 22_hrrf misling rxpLK sysWerrx w Llon LFLi pLja A shall be rnrr d Fnrn sear iae pLT(:iiy f kdirxLrrre 9ecimm 9 1 4 ad 9 4 X. Cimuct the l;entral DiNtnd IIndth DghMtrto:Ll IQ ahurnkmnrirLL pnxxdLLtes and irrgriLtatms. 23.The f:ily bF Mnrx1LLn ieyuna Oat pLremzir zd imLmlirm sysbwm Ice mgff ied by a yew n)Und s lr t nr water(Lim,11 31l(r.].Th L.r4tpixmi.should be requiod la Lace any erisio45 awfaue iw %,ell wale fir the prvrsary�. If a.sLaikL m Avil � is nil available,a M&Tx. L u=Lmxm lu Uw ctduLmy wakm sw,L=shall.be rcgidrmL cra single pumt axsredirn es uldwix1 thi tLL4LIupur will he respmnciWe Iinr the IayrvsA of asaemrrerlx fix the sa>.num n areas TNiLw kl &w:llymLrr Iklm alrp rmml. M.All nmLrpLxln&Lhex,carols,Iabeak�it wires,euclLesive ur nx=al walerau): inuwsmljmr, mossiW{R baymE adja !.arrd amoiSwus io the areaherrq sLbtbyxletl skill Ix aLILlre ssedl-w1lW 11 3A Li. In perRLrnvng.Nwh wLvk Lim appliLzru shall utngly wnh ldallo(bete 12 1207 acd any ollQ aWlwahle law or rgpL tkm. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision No. 2—FP-2025-0033) Page 16 of 16 W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Cielo Azul Condominium (SHP-2026- 0001) by Marcel Lopez, located at 3512 and 3526 E. Louise Dr. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for a short plat to condominiumize two(2)office buildings into eight (8)separate office units for individual ownership within the L-O zoning district.,by Marcel Lopez. Case No(s). SHP-2026-0001 For the City Council Hearing Date of: February 24',2026 (Findings on March 3rd, 2026) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24t'',2026, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24t'', 2026, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24', 2026, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24t1i, 2026, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24t1i,2026, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) - 1 - be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for short plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24',2026, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner,and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-613-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24", 2026. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -2- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 3rd day of March 2026. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 3-03-2026 Attest: Chris Johnson 3-3-2026 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: _ _Dated: 3-3-2026 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -3- Exhibit A DEPARTMENT REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O HEARING 2/24/2026 Legend - DATE: Project Location E, LUi9 TO: Mayor&City Council Area of impact i= City Limits FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 - SUBJECT: SHP-2026-0001 Cielo Azul Condominiums s -r - �� LOCATION: Project is located at 3512 E. Louise Drive '' E- and 3526 E. Louise Drive in the SE '/4 of L the SE '/4 of Section 4, T.3N.,R.2E. i L , I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Short Plat request to condominiumize two(2) office buildings into eight(8) separate office units for individual ownership within the L-O zoning district. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Marcel Lopez, Conger Management Group—4824 W. Fairview Avenue,Boise ID, 83706 B. Owner: Same as Applicant C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS The proposed short plat depicts subdivision of air space within two (2) separate office buildings that are currently under construction and located on separate properties near the southeast corner of Eagle Road and Franklin Road. The proposed short plat aims to create eight(8) separate office condominium units for future ownership purposes. According to the Applicant,all of the previously approved project elements are remaining with no anticipated changes;none are proposed with this application. The subject sites obtained CUP approval for each property(H-2024-0045 and H-2024-0046)and CZC and DES approval for each FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -4- building in 2024 (Touchmark Office Buildings A and B A-2024-0090&A-2024-0091)with all associated building permits being approved and currently under construction. Staff has reviewed the proposed short plat for substantial compliance with the criteria set forth in UDC 11-6B-5A.2 and deems the short plat to be in compliance with said requirements. IV. DECISION Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions noted in Section VII of this report and in accord with the findings in Section VIIT. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on February 24th, 2026. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject short plat request. I. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Marcel Lopez b. In opposition:None C. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -5- V. EXHIBITS A. Short Plat(date: January 2"d,2026) MAT SHOT= C=ASUL CWGOWMUU � IOiS a iiRsl]nt�u iw il�ufwxn�_�_ ------------ II1G�[fYr1 n!3w u 11i]Lli4».+Iw; ���� .�.4.eaSa�biru�ww[iwwlr,arvd i I i i s.rar�r r nea � __ .may.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ _. I r R I• Ml DlLTr,maM37 �. ... T® a �.,�®. ,�� �•�•`�•���L fwf:�..r�.vf!!S. WHM14.SAYYRa7TiiS.a1M FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -6- PULT isuM iG eKxra ,rmra C®A AM CUNDOIENR Y ............................. kk.r a:usvnrnva N AWR Himi.r.:n :,,1..rii iar.VxTION Ll1J CffiA iaIIL COi76GYWRY f r f + � r I � f 1 �� rlxw:c i {fn � rk I r snar `s Irm RS i er e �n - . Sri S c� I I 70770N=,,IDZa)M7� 't"4 �d (dBJ�B9-9101 3y Im Lm(=.kntySaJ{Lli. W54WL4Y17t?01iLs coI FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -7- PUT®eomr , .FAEL.. .. cMo am caKma mrY l l:i l'r.I.I:Yrt'11L1Y ❑ ❑ Li ❑ Q NORiII RIEVATION .'90LIT1i Y].IiYA'I'R'ry jj I:a'I -..I:'r.l'I ti fl lQl7 S.WAST&fa:F27N ALS. 004E7-r$05J7 ���� (d�]�BB-9101 mow# Au(are)�5ealas !ml�nr�11G iNtM1Y51YYfnOTiLS.a1M FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -8- rur SHWOH 1c El" P . . clew AiN CONDOVINIUM M7MCATFof011MM A030VALEMEPE r nwu..,Pnwtr 35s,ly+n+P.nW.PR+v..n.']Y+]'e.fe]rxer rpa�rau.w ixsw.nf'llxl� fi,P,d Y..u,RF.irasrt,..wwilss ',rws arrw Mxo.nrcuraw.n ®FRaGIiE OFSIIMT771.F �p�fd rf. 'tk•rwP.�N WOW rxwti.ry r..oPa•ntlr...lwnvld klr m ar,ase.nrn.�.�....�.a.ruwt�stwnr�.t..ov � .Y�aWaYW LVRivai �emu..�w.rrtuf[�1I.P n.�.�.xiy nrere.,u�a�rc�exwe a.,win n,f PnnFiP.i oKuowr4npsna5ui.uam rnem ma�6 aw�.M1.wa m.wuwx�io-w..rn�w u��asvi YUA1.�m YPm�.If.tu.lotfPN[9L % f iad1�a1E1Q UKU 11Sd9TF S1117 ,MHlE77 yr{[X�7 f fur{I09)19Ei-m WWW-9AWTd0M Y MM FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) -9- PLAY MOMM. CIELO AIM CONDOWN1UY �Wa`o�"'"':",,:�.e�.a��::�,�o"�c�0.,.�.:,�rn..,a�wz�� �:..�Y���'str---•-,w� - ..n�,.,wc a.a...a�.rrnrov..x anuc�°.cwowcoor�a.rr..�aa.r�� s ra..r�..e. .................... 1167� DMCTf,ID 91677 raw FAYRM)3"tM B. Previously Approved Plans(A-2024-0090&0091) FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) - 10- BFrE DATA n.n ..�..w IIES�ils PIN p OWNER DATA 1 VJ I F � } Lc {y �y�{ s •R I � 4 yK.'. I r n 0 � wL La 1 � cr I I � �_ �d Q®m I A-i A VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) - 11 - Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development: AZ-05-022, CUP-05-050, H-2024-0045, H-2024-0046, A-2024-0090, and A-2024-0091. 2. If the City Engineer's signature is not obtained within two (2) years of the City Council's approval of the short plat, the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained, per UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, obtain the signatures from the Ada County Highway District and the Central District Health Department. 4. The short plat prepared by Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC, prepared January 2, 2026, by Jeff Beagley, included in Section VI.A shall be revised as follows: a. Note#6: Include recorded instrument number. 5. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the previous approvals noted above does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) - 12- B. Public Works wartewater • Distance In Sevier Sevier Avablsile at Site Servias • Sewer° • EbimLmdPmjpdt See pplimtti n Sewer ERV3 + WRRf Oednig fialarroc Prap5d LbrLskliffrt 1es with%W fib PlmVFam1iityPhn + tripadis/aon oenw + See Public Worts Site Spmclx<<••dii1tipam Wales • Distance toWaler WalerAmHablcaLSite Seri as + Pressurr2ane • Lslimatod Project SLR applicalion Water CRLrs Water$vlity Mons • Pmjext C+ sistmnt Ycs with Wafer Master Plan • Im ctsJUnm-rm bloom S]TIi SP[i{:II°I{:€:S3NDITIONS: 1. Each bmlding will be Pmrmd wally a single water melee.Illlhng irf mdivi+hd LmsLs rxssLs No he arl&rxed in the I IOA€y'&R- Z No pernummnt smichwe shall he allowed within a City utility euwerrrent iocludirg use%deep FcK*ed shrubs,renoes,trash enclrnaaes,carpntsti slredw,bmlilmgs,e4- CGNGRAI,CO DITION5: 1- Sin3Wryxewersenirrlathisdeve]rmnreni3savailublevuexLereminurexsslingmainsadj&wn1m Lie deve]rilmaenl.Vk'atm se ke Mr lh is sate is availah]e via ertensicm ufeKmtin!�maim adpa t di Lhe devel ipnenl. a- All irnrmn�NFdateddrpoliclifesafayandheahlishallbecumlrleieL Tl wiumcLgsLrrcyuf Ilre Ktnx7Lves-Where aplrroved by Ote Cily Iingmeer,m leaner may past a perFirrma w-x surely Rrr such imrmnxnenls in mder Iwo+ibtarn€iLy lingirrerr signature un Lhe fma]plat asset RMh in l.'D(' 3. urmm msw Win ur the lwxLwcapmg and lxarrr La mxpeelion by Tlarnmg BelrKutrsent sudf,the alrplxary shall ltrumle a wumn ccruFicLrle urarmple800 as set Ruch in 1.DC 11 3H I-IA. 4. A letterofmdil crcash surely in the amuurAaf 1 I0%will be Tapnedforall ftwum dete 6ertcsr,& landwuarngg,mrbmrires,lwesm i�d srrigaLxrn,prior 1kosk9mdu e t n the final TiLYL FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) - 13- S. TYa{:ily4fMerxlianregWFusthattheiwrrterpLxsLwith the O'ityaperfwmuroesanitym the aimur,L of 125%4f Lbe UYW ronxWctiun aLxsL for all imwnplew sewer,wa w mfmslmcuue pi-Nor In lnal I&Lsignaeoe_This surely will be vmficlhy aline rrem LusteslimL6epmvrLlndhy the owner Lathe Cily_ The applicant steal I be TeLpined Ni 4LteT oLtu a Derelup•nenL Shuety hgreemenl with the t'ily of 6[aiLli2Ln.The suety canhe postedmthe furmrrfar inevocabde le lcr uFnedrL,Cash depoaLirr had ApplxmL must file an appkatirn for surety,Which can he fbiaxL im the O'imumo&ity Dr bpme A]krmunnmt webale_Please amucl Iaml Piexehlpr t Servioe f w more mfixmalion aL 867 2211_ 6. Tlx:City 4f MerkiaL Te3aGC LhaL the framer p iNL Let do[sly a warrardp sun.Ny or Lhe arrNxml cif 20%4rf Lbe Inlal cumKiruclnxt Lust for all aLmrphsiml sewer,and wa6Q orfrasbnxLLne fur a dLaatiurr 4riwo y s.This surly a KrnL will he verifidl by a Ime item Final roll inanirmg prrroriled by the irrrrrer b Lbe City.The smmLy can he punbcd m the fum rlf an mrevrx:able leper uruedrk cash depnmil 4r bard AMrlkant mn&xi File am applicalmn kv merely, whxh cm he fmml.4n the {.munumky Derelarr L INTarmrmt wehsrre. Please CMIL LL 13Tx.3 Deaellrprnenl .`}ero>,x RLr Tmae inNKnutiorLal837 2211. [n the even)that an appbcarl MWYOT irrnrr ramLot calopkLe nun life,nun saltily and nun health impnovemenu,pmtr Nr O3ty Bigirma sipiaiue ire Lbe fmal plal arm bxr prim tcl Lxx upomcp,a surety agm =Lmmy be appiomd as mil forth in1JFX'11•SCtiW. R_ IL shal I he the MPINLsrMAY 4r Lbe applisMI Nr e0511Te 6rrL all deuelupmenl FeaLLuem comply with Lhe AtiTnoicaaswrrh Ilhsandrlaes ALtard dye Fair IWx®rg hrL +k Applicant shall be resprmsibk forappliryirroand can4liarce welh.my 1kcLxm-109 ParrriMng LhaL Tony he mquim3 by the Army Crops 4r Iirigiineers. 10. Dn leper shall w H-dimw m FhuK Iuoauxm web Lbe Meridrm PixiL 011froe. 11. All gra agofllrsiteshallbeperf&amedmumfemaorewiB&IHt'C11 1413. 12.Ownpxulm Lest resulLs shall he sullrmltal Ni the Mend&m]3uihLmg rlepvi.ment Iiir all Ind ldigS pads reoeivinS emgioeoed bmkFi11.whorL iixdine'AuWd su atop fill.TnaLeriaL. 13.Theapplxarti desalt;LmxiFou shall bempclnuhlc 16rinL.31LLLnm ul'al]rrriSatirm 011.14r drainage facilily wrlhin th&MIjeL'I Lhil d4ni1L fall undo the Jun.idiun n afm irngptlun d&itn L't or Acria The design engineer.ih„ILpmxi3eueri3Fcat:tin LhaL Lhu farrlrrie love hem msLdled m aoOlxT3an Lx wrrh Lhe appmnv Ldeagn plans.Thiso bl-LaLnm wiLI be Telluired hefine a rtifirate urix:rulsusy is issued for any s1ructi m within the pnr]eLL 14. Al Lhe Lim idw n or the pmjeci.Lim applirairrt"I he Tesp nimble lu n&mit record tbrdwelp per Lhe nLy uF MerNLam ALMcCAfl KuuwW& Theme reconl drawirip must be received and aprutrred pi:oiw W&he rsauanre of a ccslifrcauuii of VoCLpWILy fur any stri L S within Lhe rmgeoL 15. SL e l Fight plan nNuriiemmL%are listed m mew=6 7 iif ere i nll c era L Sidr.Lu&r4r SbeeL [u Shung (bttprRwww.meriL]iari6tg.orgipubhc wiwLs-aspc?KI-272} All sheet IkShiN shall he insblkdl aL&kvL:hg3cT%cxpcnsc. Firied dLmign shall be NuhmoLkcd ax pmt 4f Lbe desm34 ammi phn s-1 fur appnrral,wbiLh nmist imcln k Lk ikwa&im or my existing suxot Iighi� Tbc c Lractui% work and +tiiurals shall umfhm Lo the ISTINC mad The City of Meridian SLggrlanardl .`3l 3frcati4ns Nr the[SPW('.f:umLwi the Oily 4f WriLlian TraFkspLwlatiLrr amL(JBlity{'4ordamNrr aL1i41i55DBF4trmformabmonihelix:atirnxilfecmlingxbeeLli 16.The applicamLshallpnrrideeasenlrrLh[sJ for all PUhI1L wALITF ewermams outsv[e irfpuhliL righLilf way(im1ude all wa&a services and hydxmiW. The eamernenl wxUhs shall be 20 feeL wide An a single utility,tic-M feet wide for twll_The L;.Lgariwts sha]I 310L be&ALK led 472L Bye plal,but rather dcdirakduwxidc Lhr piLa pnmxms using Lhc CSLy OrMcridia -.%:U=dzmLformx.The ea_seroentxhall he pWrhically depicted m tare plat for mFererra purprd S ibusit ao executed Basemen&(uo the rrrrm avAbb a fnm&Public Wodsx alega]&:ciplirm prepatedbym rdahrrLiLemed Pnrfessinoal IaixLSSmrgu,wdliehn ioLcrude the area ofd1LG&x&9ncTLl(FnmLcdIiXIIII31TA)ax!mJiUrx 1 l-uup wi0&bLaiingx and dcaaLas(maAcd E-AErtl&Fr 11)FIX Tvricw.Both rxhibils mist Ix waldl,s3ped and Sated by a Prirfemmmal Land kareyor.FX3 NOT REXIORD. Add a note L4 Bye plaLreFnvLLmgLhisdmiureN. All eamsr its -Lbes IbinA4LLTesiewel,Wdappnn�dp&iorNo apuua of the final plal by the City EnSjxi r_ 17. Applicant shall he respix lhk for appi a ram and conmpdimn wi0&wd NPDEiS permilling that Tmyhe requiredhy the Privmrnmenlal Nibmu m Agency. 1S.The Oily 4f Meridian requires Ma- prexiwirnd rrrigaLnm system he surlier by a yaar mural sauce DF water(i.IX: 11 M 6.)_The appbLWA shicild be required ID Lese my a resting sufam or well wary r4r Lim primary suraLe. rr a s&ufare rLr well me is Twat ararlahle,a singk poinL awffw Ilio er n tit(be inch ary wat system shall he Tequired.IF a niggle poioL crnrxNANM rs Ldlkrn1 Lire developer will he wspumihle fur the layman itf&w&KsmFilx for Br rarmmm areas prmr ill develcir�Lphnappnwal_ 14. All migaLim dibolrcs, canals, Lwwrdk,4r Lhminsv CKLhusire iif mLLaaL watQwa}s, inteim Ling, rnnssmg ILr Lryoyg adf¢mL arxL cmtiguuus lu Lhe area hemg mbdirided shall be addxe wd per LJrX' 1 13A 6_ rn perlbrnwing sLamb work,Lire applicant shall anrnply with Idaho{74de 12 120'and any 4Bler applxahk Law or regu]ablm. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) - 14- VII. REQUIRED FINDINGS FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE In consideration of a short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: A. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the Unified Development Code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Mixed-Use Community and the current zoning district of the site is L-O. The City Council finds the proposed short plat complies with the Comprehensive Plan and is being developed in accord with UDC standards for the existing zoning district. B. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services will be provided to this property and are adequate to serve the building sites currently under construction. C. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvements program; The City Council finds that the development will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. All required utilities were provided with the development of the property at the developer's expense. D. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services as services are already being provided to the immediate area. E. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed short plat to condominiumize the existing or approved structures will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. F. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. The City Council is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with short platting the structure on this site. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Cielo Azul—SHP-2026-0001) - 15- W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ, PP, MDA (H-2025-0016) by Studio H Architects, generally located at the NW corner of E. Pine Ave. and N. Adkins Ave. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Rezone 2.9 acres of land from the R-4 to the R-15 zoning district and a Preliminary Plat on 4.68 acres of land,consisting of 24 building lots and 7 common lots, and a development agreement modification to terminate the old development agreement and establish a new one.,by Ethridge Development. Case No(s). H-2025-0016 For the City Council Hearing Date of: February 241'',2026 (Findings on March 3rd,2026) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24',2026, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24',2026, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24t'', 2026, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24t1i, 2026, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24',2026, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for rezone,preliminary plat, and development agreement modification is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24',2026, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner,and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC I 1-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1 I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -2- A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of February 24t'',2026. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 3rd day of March 2026. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 3-3-2026 Attest: Chris Johnson 3-3-2026 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: _ _ Dated: 3-3-2026 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -4- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C jl/� E IDIAN�' DEPARTMENT REPORT r I D A H O HEARING 2/24/2026 Legend DATE: (Remanded to Planning and Zoning Project Location Commission on 9/16/2025) ;_: Area of Impact = City Limits TO: Mayor& City Council Analysis FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner m 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Sabrina Durtschi 1 SUBJECT: H-2025-0016 - Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ,PP, MDA LOCATION: Generally located at the northwest corner of E. Pine Avenue and N.Adkins Avenue in the SE corner of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, T.2N.,R2W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Rezone 2.9 acres of land from the R-4 to the R-15 zoning district and a Preliminary Plat on 4.68 acres of land, consisting of 24 building lots and 7 common lots, and a development agreement modification to terminate the old development agreement and establish a new one. B. Issues/Waivers - This application was previously recommended for denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission and has since been remanded by the City Council to allow for changes to address the concerns of the neighbors and the Planning and Zoning Commission. The previous reasons for denial were a lack of open space,the 2-story transition to the existing single-story homes, and the change in zoning from R-4 to R-15 being too abrupt. The Commission continued the application at the December 4th hearing to remove the open space and make the lots bigger to provide a better transition. - The development does not require open space due to the subdivision being under five(5) acres in size,however,there is no regional park in the area for residents to recreate at. Since the previous hearing,the planning and zoning commission gave the applicant direction to remove the open space and make the lots larger so they can accommodate single story homes. - Since the previous hearing on December 4th,2025,the applicant has revised the concept plan to eliminate the open space and include larger lot sizes. The applicant has indicated that the homes on the western boundary of the site will all be single story which will FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -5- provide a better transition to the existing homes.In addition,the roadway was reconfigured to be adjacent to the existing homes on the north portion of the site. C. Recommendation Staff: Approval with a Development Agreement and Conditions. Commission: Approval with modifications to the department report. D. Decision Council: Approved as presented in the staff report. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -6- I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1• Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing Zoning R-4 VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning R-15 Adopted FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 12/10/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 2/10/2025 Site posting date 1/22/2026 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District [V.0 • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action No - Required • Access Adkins Avenue: Local Street - • Traffic Level of Service ACHD does not have traffic counts available for Pine - and Adkins ITD Comments Received Yes - Meridian Public Works IV.13 Wastewater • Distance to Mainline Sewer Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Meridian Public Works Water TV.13 • Distance to Mainline Water Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns No School District(s) No Comments - Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions for comments received or see the public record. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -7- Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:R2039261221 Date Retrieved:2025/4/3 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 1,223 Surrounding Area 154 8 0,E Not City ® City Limits 1,669. 2,572 4 ■ Not City Household Change Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:16.8°I° Population ■Growtii (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 43% 33% 23% Multi-family 5796 44% Commercial 2.00 2,000 Single-family y Residential 1.50 1,500 Parcel Diversity a 1.00 1,000 0.82 0Parcel Count 0.50 500 L ■Average Acres 0.00 r 18 0.10 0 a R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 NResidential Net Density Q 10.00 9.68 p 5.00 05.33 05.53 6.10 0.00 M 1.23 Dwelling Units 1 Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -8- Figure 2: ACHD Summary Metrics Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPM) Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service ` Pine Avenue 314-fee: Mirror Arterial WA N/A Adkins Avenue 648-feet Local NIA fd1A " Acceptable level of service for a three-lane minor arterial is `0 (72O VPH). ACHO does not set level of service thresholds for local streets. Figure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService . . Ready Marginal Caution °off �y FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -9- III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview This property is designated Medium Density Residential on the City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The medium-density residential designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three(3)to eight(8)dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The applicant proposes to rezone 2.9 acres of the 4.68 acres of land from the R-4 zoning district to the R-15 zoning district and leave the remaining 1.78 acres as the R-4 zoning district. A preliminary plat and conceptual building elevations were submitted showing how the property is proposed to be subdivided and developed with twenty-four(24)residential building lots and seven(7)commons lots at a gross density of 5.12 units per acre. The proposed use and density are consistent with the Medium Density Residential(MDR)FLUM designation of three(3)to eight (8)units per acre. Additionally,the applicant is proposing a development agreement modification to terminate the existing development agreement(DA)and create a new one. The R-15 zoning designation,which allows for reduced lot sizes down to 2,000 square feet, provides flexibility for developers to support a diversity and variety of housing types. This can create a dynamic,multi-generational community where residents can transition through different stages of life(known as aging in place)while remaining in the same neighborhood. This type of zoning in conjunction with other designations, should be used to support a diverse housing mix that supports long-term residency and continuity within the community,promoting stability and a sense of place for residents throughout different stages of life. The surrounding landscape consists of single-family detached homes to the east,west,and north, while to the south is Pine Avenue. It is important to note that the majority of the surrounding homes are single-story. The average density for a one-mile radius is 6.1 units per acre,which is higher than the 5.12 units per acre the applicant is proposing. Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principally permitted use in the R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. The applicant is proposing to keep the three(3) existing homes on the property and will configure new lot lines around the existing homes that conform to the dimensional standards. Since the previous hearing,the applicant has submitted a phasing plan indicating they would like to north portion to be a part of Phase one(1) and the southern portion as Phase two(2). Future development is subject to the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. The property is already annexed with the R-4 zoning. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. If this property is annexed, Staff recommends a DA is required with the provisions discussed herein and included in Section IV. Overall,the proposed infill development is an allowed use within the Medium Density Residential designation and contributes to the area's intended mix of residential housing types. Therefore, staff is supportive of the proposed development with the conditions and DA provisions listed in Section IV. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.02.02C:Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development. Staff encouraged the applicant to converse with the neighbor early on in the process, and after their neighborhood meeting,the applicant indicated the neighbors had minimal concerns. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 10- However, at the first hearing in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission,the neighbors had several concerns that were not addressed by the applicant.With the resubmittal,the applicant has addressed these concerns by providing an adequate transition the neighboring residential. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.02.OID:Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity. The applicant will be extending the sidewalk along the west side of N.Adkins Avenue to connect with the northern subdivision,which will improve the walkability in the neighborhood. However, there is still an Ada County parcel that will leave a gap in the sidewalk. Once the Ada County parcel annexes into the city,the sidewalk will be completed along the west side of Adkins. Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.01.02B:Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity. The applicant will be eliminating three access points to E. Pine Avenue, which will decrease the number of curb cuts on an increasingly busier arterial roadway. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.02.00:Plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. Open space and amenities are not required by the UDC since the development is five (5) acres or less. However, staff has concerns with the lack of opportunities for outdoor recreation for residents in this area, as there is no regional park nearby. During the previous hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission asked the applicant to eliminate the open space and make the lots larger throughout the development to accommodate some single-story homes. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History AZ-00-012; DA Inst# 101052483 Phasing Plan 2 Phases Residential Units 21 new single-family detached 3 existing single-family detached Open Space None;The development is less than 5 acres Amenities None;The development is less than 5 acres Acreage 4.68 acres Lots 30 Buildable Lots and 3 Common Lots Density Gross: 5.12 Units/Acre Net: 6.66 Units/Acre B. History The subject properties were annexed in 2000 as a part of Farrington, Opal application(AZ-00- 012). The zoning granted at the time of annexation was the R-4 zoning district. With the annexation approval,the properties were subject to a DA that restrict the property to adding one (1)additional home on the 4.68 acres. The existing DA will be replaced with a new DA to update the concept plan and provisions to improvements relevant to the current proposal. This application was previously heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 8/7/25 and was recommended for denial. Since the hearing,the applicant was remanded by the City Council back to the Planning and Zoning Commission to address the concerns of the neighbors and FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 11 - commission. The reason for denial was due to a lack of open space,a lack of transition between the proposed two(2) story homes and existing single-story homes, and the zoning change from R- 4 to R-15 being too abrupt. During the previous Planning and Zoning hearing on December 4',2025,the commission asked the applicant to remove the open space to allow for larger building lots to accommodate some single-story homes. The applicant has revised their plan to lose an additional lot,provide larger lot sizes and single story homes adjacent to the western boundary. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The subject site contains three(3)existing homes that will remain with the formation of the subdivision. These homes will be included in southern portion of the development and shall conform to the dimensional standards listed UDC Tables 11-2A-5 and 11-2A-7. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant is proposing single-family detached homes(21 new and 3 existing),which are listed as a principal permitted use in UDC Table 11-2A-2 for the R-15 and R-4 zoning districts. In addition to this,the proposed gross density of the subdivision is 5.12 units per acre,which is less than the one-mile radius average density of 6.1 units per acre. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes,housing types,and densities. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 G states development should avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.06.02D encourages a diversity of housing,recreation, and mobility options to attract and sustain the local workforce. The applicant is proposing a total of 24 detached single-family homes,which is consistent with what has been approved in the surrounding subdivisions. However,the lot sizes in this development are smaller than the neighboring subdivisions but have increased since the previous application. As a result of the increased lot sizes,the applicant has lost a total of six (6)buildable lots. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-5 and 11-2A-7 for the R-4 and R-15 zoning districts. The proposed plat complies with the dimensional standards of the R-4 and R-15 zoning districts. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC I1-3A-19): Goals 2.01.02D,2.01.01 G, and 2.02.02C of the Comprehensive Plan emphasize the importance of offering diverse housing types throughout Meridian to accommodate the needs, preferences, and financial capacities of current and future residents. These goals also support infill development that complement existing neighborhoods. The subject site is adjacent to established R-8 subdivisions (Danbury Fair Subdivision Nos. 1 and 7, and Maws Add No. 3)to the east,north, and west. The applicant submitted a FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 12- preliminary plat and conceptual building elevations proposing 24 single-family detached dwellings at a gross density of 5.12 units per acre(see Section VII.G). This density aligns with the Medium Density Residential(MDR)Future Land Use Map(FLUM)designation. A county enclave parcel remains to the north along N.Adkins Avenue,which will result in a persistent gap in the sidewalk network. The property is contiguous to annexed City land to the north and lies within the City's Area of City Impact.A legal description and exhibit map of the proposed R-4 and R-15 rezone areas are included in Section VII. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6511A,the City may require a development agreement(DA)with annexation. Staff recommends that a DA be required, incorporating the provisions outlined herein and in Section IV. 2. Qualified Open Space&Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3G): UDC Section 11-3G-2 requires common open space and amenities for developments that are five(5) acres or larger. The proposed development, at 4.68 acres, falls below this threshold and is therefore not subject to the open space and amenity requirements outlined in the code. However, staff have engaged in multiple discussions with the applicant regarding the value of including open space and amenities,especially given the absence of a regional park in the surrounding area. While not a code requirement, staff are concerned about the lack of recreational space or amenities for future residents. Since the previous hearing,the applicant eliminated the majority of the open space to increase the average lot size within the development to accommodate some single-story homes. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets UDC 11-2A-7 requires a twenty-five(25)foot wide landscape buffer along E. Pine Avenue, an arterial roadway. A landscape buffer is not required along N. Adkins Avenue, a local street;however, a 10-foot setback to the living space is required from the back of the sidewalk. The applicant has provided a twenty-five(25)foot wide landscape buffer along E. Pine Avenue and is required to comply with the dimensional standards for the R-4 and R-15 districts. With the submittal of the final plat, the applicant shall provide vegetation coverage calculations. ii. Tree preservation Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two (2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees).Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. The applicant shall provide mitigation calculations with submittal of the final plat if any trees are being removed from the property. iii. Storm integration FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 13- Per UDC 11-3B-11,the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural, effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated,well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green stormwater facilities into required landscape areas,where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. iv. Pathway landscaping No new pathway is being proposed as the existing attached ten(10)foot multi-use along E. Pine Avenue is going to remain. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. On-street parking is also available on portions of the proposed streets. Lot 18 will be taking access off Adkins Avenue. The applicant has submitted an exhibit showing the garage and street setback to the property in compliance with the standards. Lot 18 has an existing home that shall have the required twenty(20)foot garage setback and fifteen (15)foot living setback. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): Goal 5.01.02D of the Comprehensive Plan highlights the need for effective building design and landscaping to buffer, screen,beautify,and integrate commercial,multifamily, and parking areas with existing neighborhoods. In response,the developer has submitted conceptual building elevations that illustrate the appearance of future homes in the development(see Section VII). The proposed designs include variations of one and two-story homes, each featuring a two- car garage. The elevations showcase a range of architectural styles and design elements, including lap siding,neutral color accents,brick and stone veneer,varied roof profiles,and different home styles. Staff review confirms that these elevations adhere to the city's architectural standards and comply with the required design criteria. One of the largest concerns of the neighboring residences was the transition from the existing single-story homes to the proposed two-story homes. Since the previous hearing,the applicant has revised the preliminary plat to make the lots larger on the perimeter of the subdivision to accommodate single story structures. The applicant has indicated that Lots 2-8,Block 1 will be single story homes. Homes on lots that abut W. Pine Avenue, an arterial street,- will be highly visible;therefore, the rear and/or side of structures on these lots (i.e. Lots 15, 16, and 18,Block 1 ) should incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story and existing structures are exempt from this requirement. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 14- 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. According to the submitted landscape plans,the applicant is proposing two types of fencing throughout the site, six(6)foot solid vinyl fencing and a four(4)foot wrought iron semi-privacy fencing. In addition,the applicant shall indicate the fencing location on the residential lots with the submittal of the building permits. These will be required to comply with UDC 11-3A-7. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Goals 6.01.01H and 6.01.0213 of the Comprehensive Plan stress the need to minimize the number of direct access points onto arterial streets. This can be achieved through cross-access agreements, access management, frontage and backage roads, and enhancing connectivity through local and collector streets. Additionally,these goals highlight the importance of incorporating pedestrian access connectors in new developments to link subdivisions and support neighborhood connectivity within a community pathway system. Access to the property is proposed from N. Adkins Avenue, a local roadway on the eastern portion of the site. This local road is a shared drive between the proposed subdivision and the existing subdivision to the east and north. The applicant is proposing three(3) access points off N. Adkins Avenue with one being a common drive for access to Lots, 14, 15, and 16, Block 1 and the other two being local street extensions. 2. Multiuse Pathways and Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5, Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): Comprehensive Plan policy 4.04.01A ensures that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system. UDC 11-3G-5 emphasizes the importance of common open space and amenities being located in areas that maximize pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. Multi-use pathways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan,the Meridian Pathways Master Plan,the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. The standards along Arterial roadways are to provide a detached ten(10) foot wide sidewalks (multiuse pathway),however,in conversation with the parks department, it was determined the existing ten(10) foot attached multi-use pathway will be sufficient due to it being relatively new. The applicant is in compliance with this, as the ten(10)foot sidewalk already exists along E. Pine Avenue. 3. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. A sidewalk connection along the west side of N. Adkins Avenue is required to be installed to connect the existing subdivision to the multi-use pathway along E. Pine Avenue. The applicant is depicting the sidewalk on the landscape plan in compliance with this standard. The applicant shall provide a street section exhibit with the submittal of the final plat reflecting compliance with these standards. With the construction of the sidewalk along the western side of Adkins,the sidewalk will extend to the north and stub at the lone remaining Ada County parcel. The sidewalk will be completed when the Ada County parcel annexes in the future. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 15- 4. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Dead end streets The proposed subdivision does not contain a dead end street other than the two(2) common drives as discussed below. ii. Common driveways Per UDC 11-6C-3D, common driveways shall serve a maximum of four(4)dwelling units. In no case shall more than three(3)dwelling units be located on one(1) side of the driveway unless alternative compliance is applied for. The applicant proposes two (2) common drives within the development. The common drive accessing Hardiman Street will serve two (2) homes, while the common drive accessing N.Adkins Avenue will serve three(3) homes. The common drive connecting to N.Adkins Avenue complies with the UDC requirements; however, the common drive connecting to Hardiman Street must be revised to depict Lot 8, Block 1 with the same building envelope as Lot 7,Block 1. In addition, it is important to note that the applicant still needs to comply with the parking requirements for driveways off of common drives. If the house exceeds two (2) bedrooms, the applicant will be required to have a twenty-by-twenty(20 x 20)foot parking pad. The applicant worked with staff to modify the common drives to provide the five (5)feet of landscaping required in the UDC 11-6.Additionally, the applicant has provided details into where the curb cuts for Lots 14, 15, and 16 will take access from the common drive connecting directly to N. Adkins Avenue. iii. Block face UDC 11-6C-3-regulates block lengths for residential subdivisions. The intent of this section of code is to ensure block lengths do not exceed 750 ft, although there is the allowance of an increase in block length to 1,000 feet if a pedestrian connection is provided. In no case shall a block face exceed one thousand two hundred(1,200)feet, unless waived by the City Council. The applicant is compliance with the block length requirements in the UDC. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): The existing irrigation ditches on the property shall be piped or tiled in accordance with UDC 11-3A-6. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be installed to provide irrigation to each lot in the subdivision in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow the best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 16- 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. All utilities are available to the site. Water main, fire hydrant and water service require a twenty- foot(20)wide easement that extends ten(10)feet past the end of main,hydrant, or water meter.No permanent structures, including trees, are allowed inside the easement. In addition,all buildable lots within Block 2 shall be revised to include a ten(10)-foot public utility, irrigation, and drainage easement along the rear lot lines. The applicant currently depicts a five(5)-foot easement; however,UDC 11-6C-3E grants the City Engineer discretion to require appropriate easement widths. This revision shall be made with the final plat submittal. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G require urban infrastructure to be provided for all new developments,including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 17- 1V. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS Prior to the City Council hearing,the applicant shall revise the landscape plan, elevations, and common drive exhibits to reflect the most recent changes to the preliminary plat. A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of rezone of this property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines rezone is in the best interest of the City: FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 18- a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, common open space/site amenity exhibit, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. c. Homes on lots that abut W. Pine Avenue, an arterial street,-will be highly visible; therefore, the rear and/or side of structures on these lots (i.e. Lots 15, 16, and 18, Block 1) should incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story and existing structures are exempt from this requirement. d. The existing structures on Lots 15, 16, and 18 shall meet the dimensional standards for the R-4 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5. In addition, the applicant shall provide paved driveways to the existing homes that will take access off the southern common drive. e. Lots 2-8, Block 1, shall be restricted to single story dwellings. f. The maximum building height for all dwellings shall not exceed 35 feet in height. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Add a plat note stating "direct lot access to E. Pine Avenue is prohibited." b. Graphically depict the three (3) foot wide public utility, drainage, and irrigation easements on the sides of Lots 2-8, Block 2, and Lots 2-8 & 10-12, Block 1. c. Graphically depict the five (5) foot wide public utility, drainage, and irrigation easements on the side of Lots 14, 15,16,18, Block 1. d. Modify note 15 to include language stating that all interior side lot lines for Lots 2-8, Block 2, and Lots 2-8 & 10-12, Block 1 contain a three (3) foot wide easement for public utilities, irrigation, and drainage. e. Modify note 15 to include language stating that all side lot lines for Lots 14,15,16,18, Block I contain a five (5) foot wide easement for public utilities, irrigation, and drainage. f. Modify the rear easement for Lots 2-8, Block 2 to 10 feet in width. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Include mitigation calculations on the plan for existing trees that are proposed to be removed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-IOC.5. The Applicant shall coordinate with the City Arborist(Kyle Yorita kyoritakmeridiancity.org) to determine mitigation requirements prior to removal of existing trees from the site. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) - 19- b. Provide details on the ground coverage material that will be used along Pine Avenue. 4. The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5 and 11-2A-7 for the R-4 and R- 15 zoning districts. 5. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat, all existing structures that do not conform to the setbacks of the R-4 zoning district shall be removed. 6. Comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to cul-de-sacs, alleys, driveways, common driveways, easements, blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 8. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1) obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings; or obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. 9. The final plat shall substantially comply with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C. 10. Comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to cul-de-sacs, alleys, driveways, common driveways, easements, blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. 11. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5, UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 12. Submit an updated common drive exhibit for the common drive off of Adkins Avenue showing the driveways and the setbacks for the existing homes that will remain on Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 1. 13. Submit a revised common drive exhibit for the common drive off of Hardiman Street showing Lot 8, Block 1, with the same building envelope as Lot 7, Block 1. 14. The applicant shall either construct the landscape buffer along and close the access points or post surety for the improvements along W. Pine Avenue with Phase one (1) of the development. 15. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 16. The Applicant shall have a maximum of two (2)years to obtain City Engineer's signature on a final plat in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -20- 17. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. B. Meridian Public Works PR&PLATCONUCTRONS Waahrbah.`r + orbLLtm firer 5t�crL4ra�atsk Serwoes sower Shod • WYrlatrst Prokd sec app�lon Sewrs EIAFs WRAF C SImV Mbrhm + PWDM C+.EYbMr its with WW Master PGIkrEaLiIIbFPb4L • YrLpsaLiA/oolrmrrLs Sec RMIL Walbs 5ft 5pedfk roll"Mu 1Ek�r Mstnh.•to W. --r UWff AwRa6 at Stto Sodas Esalmatod PrD&d soaappbr ftn Watcr E10.ri + W2kvr$L2W None + PreJLtit conskstem Yes with Wier Mbs er Phn 1Mr0d3j0_ _— None tiCll N}eddir{ii+�Y�i48rA�lYil•JI 1. F#�rPrer aatt imma e%&,H nudn lash. F. Figmaar wL iry lr&b LiAx U�.I(a Wdl Li I r.*ai.d 4n ltl AnG a niu he ab".k rd par mrp,.L aryr[gwRYLIli4r LLd pr"ral Cbandonnlem Ma Ltrt pM—kd La dh Cuy.{an be used Itr LReacun.rbl�mpmlan. 3. PMvIdt b7 Fiiem 14 nWn4 hydr L ILalfoH and.ner ienwe .F'Y.e!'Pmu atauld L LGlyd Lqp la lhG iw armudhrhy&wnN a nwwr and I EY t47and IL 4. N.plYbunem sLr>,x rea due&,,be&s,hwldusas,eh Wn:;Lrasb rasp Lw1t..&tL,knoCy IhrillrlL Pan VLYP[3K-S,IL01 PQk:',NL`)La be bulk wllbin Ne W IIL]ez i&n W!bL S. Facum Mi Ae f r,Peril pass Lbmx gh uiAlLfGalon Lrli ht 5. fasLae dig these is no feuz vithia S nF the water InelL:r. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -21 - L:�al L:a.SLrro arApprara3 3. App3Ir L WWI.___..__ .aad ael Llwtl nu.n Alit and irowmg ah Lht Puh llc Wahs 11qnnnwarn L,ud d ec z iardar.l Iifnu ofe mtru for any nLitu 111aa arc fequlrrd La pmvlde stfw oLLralr ara P,.bu rlghual-wAy. M.a.mum faLCr Qe newer mains Li Lrre fre4 LUOo rrom LOP of prpt n sLL-grkk u Lis Lhan lhtrt Ian 1Wn an..wa,.w rLLU Shall fr LLwd n .rwidwaxuk:&of(:l[y al M trLd wl P.Lb LK Warts l k4ur ll term tilandard 14*clrwiw WIL 2. Per Merldlaa t:ILy[-od.4 K%X:).the appllmnL AUL h h=irrLSLh-Lou UL ltwer Md toff v.aLad io and Llro.gh Lhii&—gophwfu-A"IL,: m may WtLLtlhle lava re.nrkwY nkm agnernurf rhfmffrmfuilu trih4a[MnBYptt MICC-S-&S_ 3. 'rtit applie !.sML pmvldl ctwmlaayn}fin all pille waanJL u a a a.al exude of puhha rLdr er .ay l L bdr 0I water nerd[el Md irtIaahlL The etll.rllL wldLhi stall ha DD-Ian—&Pi a single uLWy,or 30.4eu.Ld`bar f.o, lrlL eekotmh.L`U shall rva he dtd—+ •m Line pLaL,&r rmbr w6aahod Mtlide lie plat pmun uung dw ury of Maldian's suff ud farms 11w eaafoenL aWl he gaphlmlly dlepinrd m Lie pit rot refaawe pmqrreL.yuhrlld an e.evre i GaelleT.L ion Vit Iorm zL La61e Mom PWAx WwW.akjm ddL'rlpum prtporLd by an Id&Y Lueretd Mle>alonal Land i111[F,a.wirb eta lnerdr Lha a al'Urt msenurf je6uSS d FxmmrI'A)andm Klil'x 11"7lap wich leump and dis[Ance tuahei I-XI LIKI 1'Kl Gr fault..W.ahe h.bu nlua he Stahl,Akrrc and dz d by a PrultrlonA I-aW S. --yar.LA) H13T RF:C-11MIk Adda Doi&Lo-dw p1m miurc..c.l.p V.G 8aturrKnL ALI to;wft-nLs niusL tG submlLLrd,re-.&wtd,and appmHd prlar lu d,c4rntm plan iMru.nl. 4. 'I7rt[-nyal'MerLdlr inhp Lua Lbm preurimd vrgalxr Aymwa h iuro LLA by a year-raurLd aauree of wa OULK:I I 71M-G.The appltui Wrequurrd tit ust Any tauaing iurRrrar .ML�a r.Y Lot ptuyLuy La..rct. It Atmore o[wdl Awrrit�s_n a,allablt.a iLn&-f{ m fr mutt L}aa as the aLd a y.met LyL hall he".Ul d.11 a Llnpf eI--i f W1r1ae u LLLu&d, tht iluirrterr.II he fefpensihla Iar im paynwr aI'a2samcnw ICr 111a[aoralra area pnarm Fdw m eme.rdlg dtpclopnlcaL plaa N.pr—al. 3_ MCLWngwiciLu"iftm Arc roqu.rt-0mWjenvL,kds Mllw:phtrLo torLLlrrualpW by■e C.'dy F:np...0.r. Any io n,thin,-,Lhm we ilium ed La hnlwrL ihml be ibprala eL4luaLarL Md p SW&x&wmtnmtn L al 9ren address L4S Lu 6u In b-"IudeL ...Lh KK:[-. { A31 vrgpauea duhea,(anal&laLt"a dr3,adt,txel.alwt of neural waLLr.ayi,�n& towdlgoelayLitodjaceMaMtonut •cLa1}eW hamp,iuhdLvldad1hZLl42&MM2rdPer UIX'11-3A-G mPffmm wt nuah warms Lfit eppllearlL illml comply wr1Lh 1.Ub&93oar 42-12U7 and my on=1pplrcable law or tg.Iii wh. 7. Amy*81.6 dmd will sal eonwuuW Lo he aaed nlua he pn.perlyAwvdor.rd aeeordLag Ln 3daie Well Consizue0A ilmnluha RJeLL Wminl9Hed by Line MO.IXTAULtnL of wmer Tbt 1-1415�2 J-}facer AWI pmwlde a�L Wdms ng wl.abff nitre aer Say n wding.MU.n riot+ternLL,and Iran.W.LMy will.aor w b&used er profloe l dofiibf ahaairr.rr� 4. AayuumAg2:pLw LycwnLL widwo An prelrm LhW tit r8fa3fCd 17ido Acrvlet paf Emy uauuhic !krurr'JL-1 4 aril Y A M. [-rruia I:bKW r3lorlm FELM bar ahuldmnumL praxirta zhd I nipe!hede(20M)3T3-i21 1. 9. SLraL�aftm6e In p6we,zuwury at.eraM.aLcs sysafm AWL k approwtd aM ALLL,mj!LL foal 1pproY lby Lis_Ada{-c.rfy HLgh.ay lknvuL and dh Fulm Plat far Ulu_ L,1fLLYaa xIuLI he reflwdat,prwr t,Applying frr b.Minp re im. M.A ktiaY..UNA.L w aul.surely.n urt omaum or 110%w.IL Fr requ rtd I"ALI m:oniplewl IL-1.Lt,Iu.Jxy.L ,u..tan,a,rLL.,prim ro s.pnAwc..n Ue fuLal plwi. 33.All.ngw..,k..Lc.Llx fcWed to puhlw Ilft,iakty and hcmlh ihml ht eonlplaW pact Lu oaupariy era&ivuL:.wLx.whirr fppmYmA by llrilty F*.rLeer,as ewaer may pea a prrforru.a surely rM Lug#.ny.lUstn.Laf1 in ordu loahlma f:lry I i.rr..aeaf iLg curt on Lila ram pLoL as an ImV.Ln LIUC.'11-5C--M. M.App1lanLLha31 he fNwrtdio pay PLhht Ylaela dc,clopnkmplMrcrrt.,andlonuruaron Irgw.!hdi ferL,m del.minedibrlLLg LML plan it—prt-ea,priormLie LiA ui.oraplan approwA kw[. 33.ILAhaUbL Lht nniir uL6LLrlyeraelppllmrILMtmurrdh m1drdopnLtmr6f..rtl fouply.uh tilt,ierrxam.rlh r3ueb1liL Afi and dh Fau Hous.ngion 34.App310L11LLha31 he mAwmlble R.eappLr.ml andt.wl.L.arYitwlLinany-Lk va 4(1 Ptrn11Wng tlul may he MquLred h7 me Amy C-urps of 35.L3rwekpn shall toecdlrwt oiaLllwn L:tr....La will.LI.L:M.,.J.an PadL Ufriue. 34.f:omfLac L1LL 1l4 results ihml W suhm.Luil LU LJ.0 1,Lc111.1—HLIL"I'll MpaneLenL for aLL buMing pbJ6wojwrttengdexredba&ILIL.1trtfuaungwouldiumapr.11.iva Ls1 37.'rbt denlga tT Ld�hall he faquved Lo etrufy ihu the strati ceratrl...0 a—wom rrc an a LLnmLual al 3-11eef aha,e tht hLgiea exiaGllihed p_tiL grouWwA -r clewaroo.'I1Lu mLo amain tluliebolam tLr mall orVrtc .l apaaex ul I.anux u r lera I-15n Ah e. 3 K.1-bt applleanli dnlgn elglaetr JWI he rcaparall le lit ln4a n al mI wri&weo armor droLfL btIIL[y>•LQM th Li prof W'L LIAL do,nal fm1 uf.Jf Lilt fuh{dlttLan al'ah IrrLaaaLon dLw.!L ea1L[71[}.'I7Ldl iptripw5(dull pwwd cerLLllcu..anLhuLbc GkAdicArt.rtLleta uauLk-dLe abc*edmL ealb Llx Wco,.ed dee rAiRL Thisat,vfi.LuLm-31 be req.Lred Wine a euulu!mt ararxLq u ,Lr muel rat my Lllucfural wnhln di pl+,,� 34.As the eompl"L orVrt profe4 br apphcara dull ht f&"Whlc b aLLmll Me Mdra..av pet tilt CIL,or Meridian Aw AA132arlmrds Thtat ivar d demurs aowttrt f4 1 dand appravtd prmf w Llle Lasarrrct or a.wmn"wan of eccupamy.rel fry ar cwm.mihLi Lht pmf W'L 2a.A Mmfl light.plan.Ill need Lo he Ineluddi ul Lit C1r11 o3feer-M&n.Mani_lkr llghi pLu. regwrtumnu arc ILQW Ln iouien 6-5 of Lhe Ihylrow Wvnl.Mmdw4;Ihr Sm*t I-qu.nx.,5 cnpy orlJlr LtardardLmn he Iound r hvj.:r7.L.w.nlarul.A.larty.ar�j,ulsl.e_.arLs.a :!.J 272. 23.'I7rt[-ny a rMerld 1aa felalftl Lhr Vie u.mr past v Ue C-my a p:rlwl..ar._e xur<Ly...L3k am.,um er US%arllr woaL ea[mLtiL.0 eaa far mL.fontpleie scwea,wr -.u.J.:use...0QAru:Lwe pmar Lo final plr slgnr..re.'IILf Luray will Fu,roiled 4y a Lr 1LL1..L.L.1�....a prnw.dW by iht o.rlcf La br 1-Ly.'IYLr Lumy am ht pi:ri"In ULe I"oral urtruuhlc Imer orcre"caLh "oea er L mwL A"ii.Lyu Lila nk an Aplrl Lcavon bar immy,.LLh c.L.Inc I&Lmd an didC f:onimumiy 13ewtupsne:nL 1)*UMkbM r hr LIL. FkL&9&eaeladL l3W 13engnpa0cnL Xervlrr bar rwr&Lnf&waL.AuMM7-t211. L£.'I7rt[-ny aI'MY.dim felalftl Lhr Vie u.mr post ti Vr CrLy a�arrary zu Ly Lin dm Saar ar ZIM of dR min f8rL9f Min[ i tar all Karnpl.,ed se er,woes Sad[tar LnfraLauelurc ref durml at of lwu: .Tha nrny..II ha wtr.r.ed ay a I1nc ntm f rA�pmvl kd h7 dR a.atf La U.c I:.Ly.Tie smny can tit poaL.-0..I Lhc Item gran Lnrrotahir Itiu r oCcEbW cmh dtpw.a er hall_"lltuu mla I'.k an AWpcaLOLI rur xrway,rich inn pt Iound an Lht f:onlmunry 13ewiLfa eu 1)*umiera rdriLLr. Fk'&W CMULL Lard J3le%*uvd nL Xtmoe far overt Lnfafaha43a m MM7-t211. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -22- C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) "rarer C-ft ff"n--t ACHD IL i �e [arni+.�u�n,r � a[n�W H aw~n C"nn�ycmN" -4ow Date:lone 9",2025 REVISED TO jessca HI If,59u0110 H Agniteas Staff Co tart:mm Pak Planwr ProjertEeseriptiore Farrington Heights Tr+pG@neratbn: ThA d*ve% Vrr*nttSeMrnated to gMerate-44 vehlde Crr03 Per day, 34 xwhidlf trip otr A4ur ir}IN PM 0"k i.out_bas*d W+Sh*Ir5#tgut#04Trh+►i0erti1jm Engineem Trip Generation Manual,p"e&tixk Do area roacrways rneeL ■ ■ Area m3ds will meet.11 ic.s WA impnwernen7tO connecting you to more id■Gw�Nl��f t4�c#-}rl44 n r�yr�r�n�•9a��e.ip•b37�F•au 74S•y�kltr4•CK F�174•wwwwr�nkwr,,a V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -23- 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to the Medium Density Residential future land use map designation for the site. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds that the proposed map amendment and subsequent development will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available in the City. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed zoning amendment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare with compliance of the proposed DA and conditions listed in Section IV. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds that the proposed amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services to this site. 5. The annexation(as applicable) is in the best interest of city. This is not applicable due to this application being a rezone. B. Preliminary Plat and Short Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The City Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds that public services are available and can be extended into the site to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; City water and sewer and other utilities will be extended by the developer at their own cost, therefore, the City Council find the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -24- 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare with compliance of the proposed DA and conditions listed in Section IV. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The City Council finds there are no natural, scenic, or historic features that need to be preserved with development of this property. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed modification to the Development Agreement, Rezone, and Preliminary Plat with the conditions of approval listed in Section IV. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on January 15t'', 2026. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject rezone and preliminM plat requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Sabrina Durtschi, Stephanie John,Maralee Turner,Brian Turner, Todd LakeX b. In opposition: Don Flatten C. Commenting: Brandon Ethridge,Jack Harp,Rick Salladay,Bob Flatten,Rick BradleX d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting gpplication: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. The main concerns from the citizens regarding the proposed project are traffic,parking, and building height allowances. The applicant revised the plat to make larger lot sizes and restrict lots that abut existing homes to the west to singlery homes. However, some of the citizens asked for more clarification on building heights and wanted to see them below 26 feet. In addition,the citizens had concerns about overflow parkin spilling pilling onto other streets. However,most of the neighbors were appreciative of the major changes the applicant made to address their main concerns. 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. The Commission continued this project to allow for the applicant to make larger lots on the exterior to accommodate single story homes. The applicant addressed this and gained support from some of the neighbors as a result. However, commission still discussed building heights and parking. The commission ultimately determined the amount of parking was adequate and they restricted all homes to a maximum building height of 35 feet. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. The commission made one change to the staff report. The commission added a provision in the Development Agreement to restrict the maximum building height to 35 feet. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. -Building heights of the proposed single and two(2) story homes within the development. -Considering traffic and parking concerns from the public comments received. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -25- C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on February 24',,2026. At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject rezone,preliminary plat, and development agreement modification requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Sabrina Durtschi,Todd Lakev, Karen Blanton,Brina Turner, Stephanie John b. In opposition: Don Flatten C. Commenting: Bob Flatten.Rick Salladav d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. The main concern from public testimony was regarding building heights,traffic. overflow parking, and privacy. However,many of the public comments were supportive of the development due to the significant changes the applicant made to accommodate the neighbor's largest concerns. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Cjty Council: a. The City Council discussed the concerns about traffic and building elevations and determined the current development and development agreement would be mitigated adequately. In addition.the Council was appreciative of both the neighbors and applicant for the collaboration on this project to get it to a place that worked for everyone. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -26- Overview)V-11. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project 1. Aerial Legend Project Localion IyA++ ++ I Area of Impact 0 Analysis FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER E _ „Fa•c 5 -�.� sd m ! l .irF �- _ - „ �_ _ �_ �' s , of n _ i .I�� re�� ��� �` �FRANK�IN ,,=y�M i�- .�- - �=' , ■ � FOR 00 . 1 - 1 - .� —- mwnuu•11�•+nuu - ��dJ nil.\� Irll � !Y plan m�1�i111111►,•111 n •i mm�nnlnl� � �nrrrn 111m •r•r_= ram. . _ CHERRY���' _ — — FAIRYIEW y �•11 -e-F _ ■ Z:� � r F�R■n.1.ui iiiri'� J � � �I "11 ■ �i i t!� 'F�� - �■._ is fir..«�-nm R .. a■n &I'■ME �`'. =w R, s*NAIRN emu,, `. n �:miiiiinr�i��~ ■ -�'ai/iu•�iir�:• .■ _� :'W .vile 11=I■. 111ONiiHe 1111115 • = I PINS' L@:! u:Ir IL ■ ■■■. MEN a =_IIII 111�on ■■■■■■■� �� 1111 FRANKL-IN IN���p, 11111■ . ■1 1 _ ■- .• —— rrrnn.■■...tip�,+. r■.B r--�■- ■ IIu nmml..ten.nr••►.►� nr`S���� • - Iprnnrn IIInn.Hid • : p CHERRY FAI�RVIEW - ° - ° i r - ° RAM r: 9:: _ :1�f■ IIn1. .... • - • �, IAAI:./''EluAl t:AJJ.1�7 uiii� ■ � PINE Iu1■_ n ...-_ Z om 1 ant__ L'11111N11h a o C G '"' any:■�11r-� .��.--- `W Z era_ammou I 11: r 1_M- E -Aim FRANKL-IN �Lom ._ .... 4. Planned Development Map Legend ® ® WME M Project Location ®� m ®® Area of Impact City Limits — Planned Parcels O Analysis _ ® m i j 1479 FM i FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -29- B. Subject Site Photos !� ! 140 4 -ti At f. AmmML id 4 � S f A FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -30- 4 1 lu Wl 1 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -31 - C. Service Accessibility Report Overall Score: 37 83rd Percentile Description Location In City Limits GREEN Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains -< 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration of lanes in master street= GREEN plan) matches existing ( of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School ❑rivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile drMno GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -32- D. Landscape Plan(date: 2/6/2026) LAHQSCAPE PLAN lantas I II LLJ 0 �O 7 9 O 14 i` . yg9 l ____-.- Lam `•__- __ --__- CaIOR E FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -33- < ------ -------------- plWas L i U F—It"c Un— mr z 42 Lu 0 F u l o LL 14 Lj T —2r L--------------------------J LIOD plW9S r————————— ———————————-———————————————————————- 81P�- X1. ------------------- ----------------- 2 F- ------------- --- z .......... 2 Lu g z xip L---------= =:cnZ 3 -1 r C) F— ca Al: 4 to < 4 LL ---- ------- --L- ---------------- - L-L-------zz.-j—]- L. L—P R A F`101 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -34- 1 t plantas _ 5 9 3 a GCK } 5 8 ; 1 •I ——_.._ HAADMA-ST. 7 7 —, ® t • 10 li 11 12m� ; woa p 7 z ._.,.v.—.._..�..,.,..,.,.�......_.......... r._._ _ 1 Z c < -.�. .. 14-13 t ®thum� lAHG3CAPE L102 14 plantas —=-�--------- -------------- ---------- ' =54 I � —t—�1 --------------- cn I I I j -� i.F.f' • ly I I I p 7 z e.—...� ._—. - a cn �M�VSCAPE11AiEliMLSLEGE - _---..-__ ----_____ --------- -----_-_------------ - _ I 1 I 1 PUH.Aarws F`103 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -35- A plantas - __..�• _ -vu.- o -m- $_ - -� a .._., -• - $�_ - �::a:�,�•.- Mg � TREE PROTECTION 2 Ti1EENV eE.w EKISTING SOI RGT IAOOIREO 3 SX�R.-IIIagOFlE313G�L v z-G _�..._•�_m. z M; Q _ - •..... -•.-- �1SlEEL LNlO3f3PE EOCJHG �16'CL09Ep VISION FFJICE TZ 9'OPEN NSISN FENCE TILAHOSCPPE SOIILSER PLACEWEM�1W� GETarsE L150 E. Preliminary Plat(date: 1/5/2026) FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -36- Fm,i,gw,Hnght,Subdhi'i—PME-i—q P1w M.P. A V- ---------------- -—----------- H6gh. PP-1 AWL 4, 7-1- - H�ighu PP-2 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -37- F-.i.g-.HcigbYs S.bdMd.. Jim -- --------- L-------- 71 i4 7 ------------ ------------—- -------I --------------- 6 ---------- — ------------------------------—-------I -- --------------- P --------- ---- --- - Higb- ---—pp� PP-3 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -38- jvrA as as ar as as ■■ se ■■ t _,,,...�:.• Imo...;�,k.Z i� ! Manson sommom NNW— `r...M.�� i •qr i "tcr, � � �x a � y ✓ .l.iy" ..'tj..���. �- a .. �. r .. I Y �Y1�Y1�. •�.. nab ..,. :.'C":, . -�.[S�" •. 1Ne,iy..�.,ti.:a ca ' FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONSOF LAW AND DECISIONORDER •' 1 11 �1 �s .'Dr{[�::'1' "Cr.�..,.ti.� .`." �- -li,: :'':�F:_:�"+.�:�..I.:��,',•:.�i-��•'•�':J''y. �^,Y. Ad 5 yR by • .lye Arl-,�;; �� ••r ,�1.1 �'� 21MIN MEN mom f• copyrlgm�y oeei�ner llnauthorizad flee Pronibded ORDERFINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION& FOR 1 00 F .s.� •-pit � • ti4, - ' x' + 114 MW up No FINDINGS OF • • OF • ORDER FOR 1 11 - i'. FINDINGS OF • • OF • ORDER FOR 00 - 77 Mh e FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -45- G. Rezone Legal Description&Exhibit Map IDAHO mg w fmaralo 5t SURVEY Solse,Id e3704 Phonv`.17001 W-057C isG GROUP Sax; f2%bh1 M4-5349 Exhibil"A" R-i5 Rezone Descripunn Por 1100, 11�14$1180 east Pine Avenue CM 61Meridian, Ida h-D the foRowmg[:--&tn s a Parcel of Lind being PorliorV of 11C8,1130 al6d i1.00 Eafl Pine Avenue in the Ci4y of Msddlan Jdam,Ccwnry Tex Parcet Nils R2039za121 , R20392d1711 d R2039261 W2 Iving n 1he Southeast 114 of the Nordweet 114 a1 See4nn J.ToWhvk ip 3 N6rfh.Rantfs 1 E *f-[lasso M veltm City Of Ml-folan A¢F C manty ldeha and being made Psrtioulerly❑e5ented as follom COMYE1 CJNG ae the Southeast C4roer 01 the Sout1'*-W 114 dl the Norlhea sl 1t4{Eml 'r4 Cam&x of Gectiw 7,Tcxrn"2 Norm,Rang&2 VAMI,Doiae Men-aan;Frain ,Match.ih*S01.41T .ot COMW of the Northeasi 114(CenIRT 104 Con-mi of sairt Section 7 beara,South$5'67Y1W'Warm.2.647 51 feet; rhenop 2imV the Southerly 9oundwy Llhb d iho SaAhaast 114 of the Norlhaest 114 d&aid Section 7,Booth Bfd` TEA' Welt,674 37 feet:o the Cerdadne I rdeminel-on of NeAh!,bins Avenuie. Thmm leaving aoiig Sowheny Eaundary Lake,and atang the Centertlne cf North Atkim Awenpe,NarM V02'01`S".29772 reel I#the PONT OF JBEGINNING; Thwe leavlhg said C wftrrle,North 69.57'21'AWst,334 55 ieel to 1he 4Veatetiyr .Boundary Lined 1 oLedy Tax Pue41 No'i R2 934 281 2 1 a. Thence along t4-e Wosledy 13aundary GrreS of C•aunt, Tax Parcel No's P=39�614�13 R?D}yM 1211 North 04'02'58'East,3715 04 feet to the NDrvwred Corner of Cattnly Tax Parcel No R-A32.W81211. Thence Jcaving acid 1+11esterly Sokwtidarx Linea,and alWV the Nonrerlr Boundary Lww of CoLmly Tax ParCel No IR203925 1 2 1 1,and jis Pmw-Ipetlon.North HF21'51'East, 324.47 feet to the Centerline of North Akkins Avenue Thonoe leaving said Northerly y Line and Its ProlIo,nI��g-ettim,and along the Centerline of hkcM Atkins Avenue 54u1h 00"02-01'Y.4Al,2T9 97 recl to ti*POINT OF 5EGIHNING. T"above Described Parcel of rend Gomtains 2.90 acres,mare or lestL IWO f W8251 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -46- LE39and BWndpy Lin4 O Fgyi4 Piva9 { c.It: 1 �i0.1 farvg ❑eslgnatlon LFIe Fcwntl Uammhrn Cop Ri9hL-o'-%0y Line 95 Ed Cf 20(1 1 Colcuakntl %pil _ — .—.._ _ Lc4JP cd Una of Reonrd Plokled La' NLMbh -- Seckiun Lire 7 C? �f7 #i►I'K? XRT 1.W T+[7 N99'21�1'E �,14.�7' 4-- 1 �.,�.. X¢ I Ms/I�RiE13Z1 1 T � Ell �..-4 ;n . r -�& F — i A S J I I F..q.t Qr 2ano R-d3 6ia;1-15 _ ?.� L N99'57'Z--V li+5f5'Zrne -15 i 3 d I W pl I 1p-k OF — — 91 �401 4 � 41 a I 869'B7'e+«�h'�si.db E• PwG A, Nag-0'0*'E 21147 61' 6a le 0 B.xpe IDAHO Efnhkbit W 'sih N. •. SURVEY l VEY :olii iw.ou+o-r '?-itS Remne for .a 1100, 11 M Ac 1180 Phis E- Avenue GROUP, LLC k—qrll h Ih4 8E 1/4 YE 1/♦Or suoy.T. G,ft Dale 7.3.II.IE..&w..Ok ar LVI#. A0#� 401c 9{t7J7[d5 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -47- IDAHO 4439 W Enw*d St SURREY Boise,ID 03704 Ist GROUP Phc kv=RM 8+kh-4t5?D fax.: INS)&84-53W Exhibit"A" R-4 Rston•t"criptlon Far 1100,1130 8 1180 East Pine Avanue City of Wddian, Idaho The fDkmrg Deaenbes a Panel pi L*nd PwLiui-h or 11QQ,1110 pnd 1180 Eam Pills Avems in the City of Wddien,Idaho,C"rAy Tax Patel No'e 1320232612 T 3, R2039�91211 d,R20}92[51302 104 IK the 5ouWoa*t IM of lh9 Nonheast 1A of Seuion 7,Tu w-ship 3 Narlh.Range 1 Eaa Gage Mercian.pity ei f .A00 CWMIV.Idaho*"t}"mart)ParbCtitefiy Described as follows GOMMENGIN6 of the Southeast Comer of the Southeam V4 of[he No:dwizat 114(Easy IF4 Caner)of Sadion 7.Tfi"gh.p F NQ0ri Rui•gn 2 West,9aise-Meridian;From which,the Soudmasi Cacner of the hwriheaai 114(Center 1.14 Comer}of said $#4¢en 7 t*a* S&AN 99"07'04'Wes[,2 W.61 fee[;Thanoe shop Hm Southerly Bavvdary i_ne d Iha Southeast 1r4 of the r46 Wm #t 1r4 pf&W SMion 7, Outh W07'P4'West,674.37 feet to the Centari a Intw9acticn ai North A,kne Atienue dhe PCHNT OF 0eGlNNING, Thomw C-0hllh6Nr'9 along the Souft"Boundary Line of the SaMhe-ast 1;4 of tfhe NDMW099 114 of&aid See-tier%7.Sou-.h 99^07'04-W*11.334 M fqW St)The P1t1kwbVhon of the Wevedy teary Line of County Tax Parcel No R2(1=151213: Ttwnae leaving said Souhmsy Bounaary Lina,and 2"wsM the Westaily flounesry une of CouM Tu PoMeA No's RM9261213.and its Praaangation,NWh W02'59`East,363 0 feat; Thane leaving said Wasitio Boundary u-Ne.and its Pralongaliaa.South 89'57'21'F% 334.55 tees 10 IF*C.ehjW:rm c4 Nadh Alkins Avenua. Theme along"Centerline of Norm A44ng Aver,$oLgh QQ'Q2%;I1'Waal 297 72 foal 14 W4 MINT OF GEGINNING. "LL shave ptttrigs¢Farc0I of Land Contains 2 31 acres,more or Isis. "275il FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Farrington Heights—H-2025-0016) -48- W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 26-2570: A Resolution Establishing the Reappointment of Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor to Seat 1 of the Meridian Arts Commission; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 26-2570 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR, WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE REAPPOINTMENT OF ELIZABETH "LIZZIE" TAYLOR TO SEAT 1 OF THE MERIDIAN ARTS COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Meridian City Code § 2-1-2 establishes the Meridian Arts Commission, its members and terms of their appointments; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Meridian deems the reappointment of Elizabeth "Lizzie"Taylor to Seat I of the Meridian Arts Commission to be in the best interest of the Meridian Arts Commission and the City of Meridian; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That, effective immediately, Elizabeth "Lizzie" Taylor is hereby reappointed to Seat 1, which term shall expire February 28, 2029; Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 3rd day of March, 2026. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 3rd day of March, 2026. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION FOR REAPPOINTMENT OF TAYLOR TO THE MERIDIAN ARTS COMMISSION-Page I W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 26-2573: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian Approving the Bylaws of the Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee as Amended Pursuant to Meridian City Code 2-1-1(C)(2) and 2-2-1(C)(5), and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 26-2573 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN APPROVING THE BYLAWS OF THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AS AMENDED PURSUANT TO MERIDIAN CITY CODE 2-1- 1(C)(2) AND 2-2-1(C)(5),AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,pursuant to Meridian City Code section 2-1-I(C)(2), at its meeting on February 20, 2026, the Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee voted to approve and recommend to City Council that it ratify the "Bylaws of the Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee as Amended,"attached hereto as Exhibit A; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems the approval of such bylaws to be in the best interest of the City of Meridian in that they facilitate the efficient operation of the City commissions; NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby ratifies the Bylaws of the Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 3rd day of March, 2026. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho,this 3rd day of March, 2026. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED DIFAC COMMITTEE BYLAWS Page I of 2 EXHIBIT A BYLAWS OF MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BYLAWS of the Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee Effective March 3, 2026 ARTICLE I: PURPOSE These bylaws are adopted to facilitate the duties of the City of Meridian Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee ("Committee") and to provide a framework for the organization and actions of the Committee. ARTICLE II: MEETINGS SECTION 1: CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR. The City's Chief Financial Officer, who serves as the City's Fee Administrator under Title 10, Chapter 7, Meridian City Code, shall serve as the Chair at meetings. The City's Budget Manager shall serve as the Vice Chair and perform the duties of the Chair in the Chair's absence. For clarity, the Chief Financial Officer and Budget Manager are not appointed Committee members and are not entitled to vote on matters before the Committee. The Chair and Vice Chair shall be reaffirmed at the first meeting of each calendar year in conformance with Title 2, Chapter 2, Meridian City Code. SECTION 2:NOTICE OF MEETINGS. Unless otherwise prescribed by statute, the Chair(or designee) shall provide the Committee with written notice of all meetings, which notice shall state the date, hour, and location thereof, and shall further state the purpose of the meeting and the business to be transacted. Notice shall be provided to the Committee not less than forty-eight(48)hours prior to the meeting. SECTION 3: QUORUM. A majority of currently appointed Committee members shall constitute a quorum. SECTION 4: CONDUCT OF MEETINGS. The Committee shall operate generally under the precepts of Robert's Rules of Order. The order of business for meetings of the Committee shall generally be as follows: 1) call to order; 2)roll call; 3) adoption of the agenda; 4) approval of minutes; 5) old business; 6) new business; 7) reports and presentations; 8) next meeting; 9) adjournment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the items of business and order of business may be modified by the Chair as necessary. SECTION 5:AGENDA. The agenda for Committee meetings shall be prepared by the Chair(or designee). Agenda items may be proposed by the Chair or members of the Committee. SECTION 6: PRESENTATIONS. The Chair shall coordinate requests to make presentations to the Committee. The Chair, in consultation with Committee members, may set rules to maximize the efficiency and productivity of meetings, including setting a reasonable time limit for presentations. SECTION 7:MINUTES. Minutes of the business conducted at all meetings of the Committee or any subcommittee thereof shall be prepared by the Chair(or designee). Minutes shall be provided to the Committee and shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 8: SUBCOMMITTEES. The Chair, in consultation with Committee members, may establish subcommittees as necessary to assist the Committee in the performance of its functions. BYLAWS OF MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page I of 2 Meetings of subcommittees shall comply with all applicable open meetings laws. SECTION 9:VOTING. Each appointed member of the Committee shall be entitled to one (1) vote on any matter before the Committee. Except as otherwise designated herein or by law, decisions shall be made on the vote of the majority of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present. Voting shall be audible; written, anonymous, and proxy voting shall not be permitted. ARTICLE III: AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS As provided in Meridian City Code, the Committee may recommend to the Mayor and City Council that these bylaws be altered, amended, added to, or repealed. ARTICLE IV:ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVE DATE The Committee adopted the foregoing bylaws at its meeting on February 20, 2026. These bylaws shall be effective upon their ratification by resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian. BYLAWS OF MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page I of 2 W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Discussion to Add Return Payment Fee to Fee Schedule E IDIAN DAHO MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Workshop Agenda From: Budget Manager, Jenny Fields Meeting Date: March 3, 2026 Presenter: Budget Manager, Jenny Fields Estimated Time: 10 minutes Topic: Add Return Payment Fee to Fee Schedule Recommended Council Action: No official action is required; however, Finance is seeking approval to move forward with the public hearing process. Summary: Prior to the most recent Fee Schedule update, the City Clerk's fee schedule included a $20 Return Payment Fee. This fee was removed as the Clerk's Office and other administrative departments no longer require it. It has since been identified that MUBS continues to assess this fee for returned customer payments. Rather than reinstating the fee on the City Clerk's schedule, staff recommends adding the Return Payment Fee to the Public Works Fee Schedule, where it aligns with current operational use. The fee applies when customer payments are returned by a financial institution due to checks, ACH transactions, or other electronic payment methods. W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Results CL ��, w ,iPAN cr AV H Ulm es � LL - z ' w ago J ir J1 J Ci L ,ems z 0 z Q- VAI• �ri w l L Z Q 0 w ro W W O Q N a, 4-j (� co -au U _ Z) Z LL c >- ern =3 LL o cv LL a) - 0 O � w >- N V =3 L +� m p c x - 3 a) s E a) � zo Q= • LLJ 00 00 d � hG d7 t, fu 4 V Cd ll J Q so %Jlo °n° � d Q � � C 73 N ono N } sa LL s4 dJ m d 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 C c.� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �D Ln a m N 'A v tr> IA. n to to • LO rq 0 LLJ nl 0 r,l m 0 0 r*1 a) LL o aj rq 0 0 nl C L a) 0 a) +- m }' • ` O LLJ LO C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0zo Lri 0 n m m N rq • LO LLJ 0 2 LL m nl 0 aJ NO nl u ai f� • 0 ai LL O o N o ai LL i cr) ai LL • 0 ai o • r O J LL ai• }' `° • m 4 o LO rq rq CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � O O LOT-i Or-i � vx v)- • ! • u'7 � LLLJ LL LL m N 0 LL boo LL � o a� • °n 0 LL u • 0 `�° • c LL LLJ C " C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . • . • LLJ L(1 � (3) / Ln MEN Vy - c- x w La LU � U � o ■ �n P Z3 LL LL (1) m � " 00 4 v Q v b0 m m Lr) o N kD 0 m a N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO CDLO o LO CD Sr) m m N NLL n <rs cn <n cn <n cn zo • � o LLJ x w to ^� 4 N 0 L � � � CU Z3 ° u o • LD E v • 4- a) as m Z m M Q / LL • O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LLJ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �➢ N O 00 �o N ih tA th iJ7 • ID LLJ DO o N N � � � N x w w r6 U r� U NZ:3 ni W LL m � � c a o E N o ci do m m un7 CN Q o CN>r N Q LL • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O cry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 00 C N zo i!} ih • LLJ �o v u ' LA 1 Q LL aZ: C U � Q LL ro � a) a • m ur) p � • N p u_ m (DID u �. � c 01 LL O 00 O 0 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O CO D V N th to LL zo Z Q 0 w W � V C6 m ai � E - N o mom o > Q � U v E LML • O � � c v r 3 LL L rn U o o �rl� Ln C m N i N — O U /7 \ E m m = m N L� W �., U O C �f1 Li cl L o N O F • `L° � + p - � M Z Q Lr) o N OLLJ N 3 L.L zo Q= �o Q- w • c x � C a] j � � h a LLJ • Z3 ■ V1 Cl) 7 N a a LL Q U d 4- 4- 4-1 LLJ � C m 00 Ln m a CN �r m CU n N a` < 0 0 0 0 0 LLJ 0 0 0 0 0 cis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u-i 0' Sri 0 Sri zo • u7 LLJ LL Irr aj tLo 0 aj 0 • aJ 0 rq €� 0 0 0 a 0 a, 0 a.� L , r LLJ F— C) rq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LO N r -V,. • LLJ LL LL W) N O U LL L N O LL L 0 O ' � O � LL C � O °; } 0 N I o 00 LL L 3 n r14 O L J LL O N LLJ L } � ^' LL L!l ■ 0 O N LL 8 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 zo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 00' lD' et N' N lD CO • LLJ v m � x w � � m L J - nL � W I Z3 ' � w Z N Z5 4- 01 U LLJ Q a ' c • m to • m Lr7 N a N H • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o hLli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f- LO LO � (n N .--I 0-4 • L 00 9 LLJ • W x 00 m a N � C ' w L � Y u LLJ Q 4 • 4� ao m to m LD u-) - N o CD r� H • O O O O 6 O b O O O O O O O t!} LLJ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I-- 1.0 LO 7 m N 1-1 th V} th iJ7 th th to zo • 0 LLJ 0 u1 N • cn x w co 4 w m L) a V �n E 4 Z3 ' Z5 LL V) N Q) � � x � o ate-+ Q V u a JD E 7 W rL Q a t • -a zi Z5 t m C CD r� 7) L • - O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLJ O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q1 00 r, 0 u'1 -zr rn N .� c , cn n to r. vs cn r. cn • LLJ ro Q1 � f0 a-1Emu C V v� Qi ; ■ oo cy, ❑ LL. l U Ll Q i Le) a a-1 L Ln ' a N LL m Q1 LL ARM • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cis 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - N O 00 L N LL zo !!} ih • `v LLJ � c � N • � n cu _ M C '2 o L LL � O � o^o .5 � Q U � om 00 +) C: Ql � o ) L.L bDm F., f � An. � m a W t N U • tin c — rn 00 co ui >.N +- m _4A. m ' • LLJ • LLJ � d Z n a) 775 CO E N Y U m Q � 4 �L � U Ln CN � � m u.. in ■ 75 LL �L W W � O O O O O O O O O C C C 0 0 C C 0 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD c Q O O O O O O O O O Ql 00 z LO m N rl • LLJ 4 Ln a E � L r i 1 4-1 � + ' U N N Q L w o_ Q L ❑ 4--+ Z3 L • ' 0) +� v u-) L.L to N 4 U m LL E u! (D • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to cn rn v. rn • Li 76 Q1 LLJ � c � N � � co ❑ ' " a a a 7:3 ao C: 7:3 D 7 Lr) fV LL 4-1 CD Q) N U � } m u �- Ln E r, ID u ID n • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q1 00 f- lD LO � m N H zo • LLJ 4-1 4-1 4-1 p � o +- rn � LL un a N a -�-j a°10 N U } m LL Q m E s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 00 �o � N • LLJ Fa r-i *' Q, a ro U H N L Q ❑CL a a� H 4- � U bD CLS C • 07 __ i-n 0 73 >% oil N 3 r_ t ' M � m LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 00 Lc � N - H H H ih t!} ih ih LL zo Z Q 0 w W � V E o 4-0 m c� 'L LL 0000 E aj 20 4J L a--+ U 40 rO O -IZi v m N _ � � o U U ( � z � � cu E - +, L-n o N U o O w CAI N LL zo Q= �o Q- w LLJ _0ateJ ate-+ L.L cn a-J V cn M 0 E L.L • N O Ln • a"' cn —0 U cn c6 (U c6 c6 • • N Lr) — Co O ca LLJ N N v c6 � Q DC Z Q 0 w U 0 L V o 0 U 4- 0 a-J a--j =3 C6 U 4 -+ N —0 —0 O N � � E N C: U 60 4-j E U =3 O LL O z EQ C: 0 a--j — o X 0UJU z 3 zo ¢z �o Q- w Z Q 0 w ro N � O 4-j 0 cr o UZ Q 0 w zo ¢z �o Q- w W IDIAN�--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ada County Highway District Five Year Plan Prioritization Follow Up Discussion MEMORANDUM E IDIAN - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O February 11, 2026 TO: Mayor and City Council CC: David Miles, Community Development Director Craige Bergman, Long-range Associate Coordination Planner FROM: Caleb Hood, Community Development Deputy Director Brian McClure, Long-range Planning Supervisor RE: ACHD FYP 27-31 Prioritization The following memorandum is provided to help inform discussions of the City's priorities for the Ada County Highway Districts (ACHD)Five Year Plan(FYP), 2027-2031. Yearly the ACHD updates the FYP in support of programming transportation improvement projects and the budgeting process. Projects in this plan, at least large capital projects, support ACHD's 20-year Capital Improvement Plan. The starting point for each new FYP is the previous year's final prioritization. The City's requests, especially the top 3, are used by ACHD to create a draft Plan, which the City is then also encouraged to comment on, and is finally adopted by the ACHD Commission. The Transportation Commission (TC)reviewed the priorities for this year's FYP requests both through a subcommittee and then as a formal recommendation by the larger group. Most of the TC's recommended 2026 City Priorities follow last year's recommendations with a few notable deviations (see Highlights below). The attached priority lists, 2026, represent the TC's recommendations to City Council. Please note that both the capital(roads and intersections) and compliance (formerly community programs)projects have some new projects that were amended to the bottom of the list but largely left unordered by the TC. Some of these projects are from the Meridian Intersection and Pedestrian Safety Report (MIPS) list, directed by ACHD staff to include in the FYP, and from the Parks and Recreation Department staff(see attachments). Capital Project Highlights: • North Locust Grove was strongly viewed as being of greater benefit to Meridian for earlier buildout to 5-lanes by the TC. This corridor was prioritized higher than Meridian Road for earlier ultimate buildout. • Locust Grove south of I-84 also jumped up on the list, from Victory to Amity. The TC was very interested in ACHD widening this section of roadway concurrent with the bridge project that is current in design,particularly evaluating if a 5-lane instead of an interim 3-lane section is warranted. (or something like that.). Also of note, ACHD currently has a programmed bridge replacement at I0-mile creek that does not accommodate 5-lanes. This bridge project must be modified to accommodate 5-lanes. Community Development. 33 E.Broadway Avenue,Meridian,ID 83642 Phone 208-884-5533 . Fax 208-888-6854 . www.meridiancity.org • Victory, Meridian to Locust Grove was dropped out of the top Ten since capacity improvements would not be realized without improvements to the intersection with Meridian Road(SH-69). This was left high to maintain the focus,just not in the top ten. • Understanding City projects, Ustick and Venable was lowered as it has less congestion benefit than other capital projects, is likely a partnership project, and already has a PHB for bike and pedestrian crossing. • Ustick, Linder to Ten Mile was functionally removed given current construction status. • While still a top priority, Linder, Overland to Franklin was moved out of the top 3 to priority#4 on the list as it is in active construction. • The Lake Hazel corridor extension, out to Micron and east to I-84, is reflected as an understood future need via#33, Lake Hazel, Eagle/Cloverdale. Safety and Compliance Project Highlights: • Either 2-1/2 or 3rd Street is important long-term. • Locust Grove and Wrightwood pedestrian crossing was added to the list and moved up. This is a well-used pathway connection without any safety improvements (including crosswalk), in an often congested area, along a multi-mile pathway network and was both added and moved up on the list. • Black Cat and Five Mile Creek pathway crossing was added to the list and moved up to reflect an on-going request by the City to ACHD (ACHD has since added this project to their FYP database as of 2/10/2026). Attachments are included below. Please note that some projects with"Mapping error"notes in the spreadsheet, are missing from the maps. These project lack accurate GIS data. Project priorities in green with white underline text are new projects for Council awareness. Projects with yellow priority symbols and black outlines are programmed, whereas grey symbols are not. Attachments: 1. Capital Projects FYP 27-31 Priorities List. 2. Compliance Projects FYP 27-31 Priorities List 3. Parks and Recreation and MIPS Report Requests. 4. Capital Projects Prioritization Map (Draft 2026 Priorities) 5. Compliance Projects Prioritization Map (Draft 2026 Priorities) Page 2 v c 3 w O \ y�' - m Im a - o - y o > > ¢>o a >o l7 (7 0 o ¢ l7 > l7 7 0 0 0 w rvo w w w w w w h o o m o ry ry w g w LL w w w w a O 0 0 0 0 0 o o w o a o w w w w w w w o 5o o o E n 3 v am 315m _> `o o o - o E _ o o _ o `ou w v m m o oo ao o f > ° ° 1 a V a o 3.E - a c N v o F o a ; o F oo y o w 3 .`a w E lo w ,. x i 3 E H o ° 3 °° m" Q ° o o - °t o O o o o w > x mcz v - `w w _ `w .o E ua " m E v m m n - '" C e`o�n - ° r - o d a ._ ° o r s- z o ,. t' x ¢ $ z `o ,. t n' > `o °c _ «, $ o = m o o am U no m 0 c _ V .o o i s 3 c 3 '0 3 c E E m Y o o m u 3 L � a i E E in 3 -0 o u° - o o v > - E i o ylo no o o � wu° =o ° = o 0 m 0 � 0 _ a « E ._ o a o o m °o o` V E m `w w - - u - 3 as 3a 3 o m a 3 n8wa ° o - j \ m o 1. Q o o >° z � � o 0 0 ° ¢ > ¢ a F w ° l7 > l7 a• o c v c O O C Q '6 ti M V d r-I r � v El O \ I N o o to t t: - - > v .�'� t a � N -off - o o ate `u m um° u LLuLL � � ¢ au o a LL LL � LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL rvo LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL o LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ■ m m LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 'o `o_ E lo `v — v 3 o 0 o �o - o $ v o;c - � N � s a O o m t I O d Z O « a N ate+ O O -C a ° E a mc L a w o N o Z v E E w E o a 3 3 3 w3 o. w oqj v LT a = a E c n 3 0 x Q m a m o N S w E .2 v m ISo - r s 3 «'3 := .3 c v 310 E Y o a r o c m T E 6 v 'a u o o. a a o m - o w¢> ¢> w a 'u^ o 0 0 0 o v i s cv " a A v IT v s a m >o o i z a \ ° o \ u as 0 U u Im u t u — ai¢ ti v o v 0 ii Q v Q 9 >0 Q a >o t ¢ � u m u u �LL uLLt� r � aaau a gum � m LL � " � o UJ c O d C Q ry ry ry ry ry ry m m m m n'1 V N .-1 .ti M N ry N Nry N ry ry �m v � N 1N u _ Y — v j o s1,5lo o v - _ o _ c c u ry u ai ,. :o o w e w vsi w > > > > w ¢ ¢ > ow LL o o o LL ory w LL o ory w w LL LL LL w LL w o o o ry � ry o 0 0 LL w rvo LL LL LL LL LL LL w w w LL w LL w n a 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o rvo w LL ry rvo ry rvo LL rvo w LL rvo �i LL rvo w w LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 o o i 0 `o w `o c v v ro i o IT H c u � w a' O O d r m w M � _ N o m c U 3 0 _ _ o s .3 o a U E o = E 3 a m s aN s E _ E °° m E - 3 Q-a a o° o - n `oo o 'ao `-0 _ o o o o o o `o o .� £ o .� a 'o w v Z w `o Y .w ' lo o o o t w v o o w E-cva w w aci w w ° aci a w u c c w a ` E u 3 n E 3 a 3 a 3 0 0 0.3 a 3 F 3 `,-°i 3 3 3 3 a E 3 a ° a o. ° 3 3 3 3 S a w \ N u o Eli w O °� - `L - � u - w E nl u o - -Nac oo o -o a u -w °1 O I c u u u a o c o u > LL ¢ a > m m m •' a o 0 c v c 0 `o d � c Q N � M N m m m m C V C V V V V C O N m m m C 1 � O- rl r � w N ) ' < f \ f f E 2 \ \\ \ ® \ } � ® - { j \\ \/ } / § { _ { { { } j - j= s : § ! \ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \ -a \ \ \ ) ) \ ) \ ) \ / ) \ ) \ \ \ \ ! e ! ! ! j \ \ § { { / [ \ / \ ( \ \ \ ,; ( \ K § : §: : _ \j \ \ \j\ \\ \j \j \\ ! \) - +} ( ; ) 7 e t0 \ \ / � > f / o } \ { C } { : ) \ ; i \\ })) {\� / {) .\\: [}: \zw : . \\\ ; t= , t ® latz®tf § (} 5 ({ k}$ }) ) - 3 -- 3 % [i/ f - - ) [\}{ ( ± mW>-0 [ \ : [ `: ! ) ( t E� ( - - � � \ f\ [ {§\ \� } { \ ) $ : / ; 3 \ ! \y) y ;al;a#)a:) at = � > ! ! 3 ) {) }) ) } \/ } \ \ \\ }\\ ) \ }\\}}}\}) }{\{ \\) )\ })\ } \ Im § « ) % ) ; 0 - - - : } © j 7 % ) \ \ \ Z g ° � : \ . ■ \ : : : _ : : _ _ 0 _ , , , : N C W �p O O l0 >T V O o 3 > O J °72 - p' - u` a o - tj �i z o V z > z v'o U v N � t°� m° o N m o ry N w w u w w OO Z N Z LL w LL w w p o 0 o O o 0 N w w u ry w w O E O 0 • O E 4 p O D U \ C � � O o v N $ bOn a 2 o u m n'a ono �'= 3 3 m Y c > m c 3 a1Oi - « « a m to O _ c m 3 - - w > o a w n no m z c c a _ Y v = N a ° oa cv - Y - do a _ 3aao Na 3 m 7 o Y 0m u lo ¢ m 3c % o E s - 0 o .- a oo x . c . v c oL " o ° c 3oL .aus3 w --oo w E ° o t E 3 - ° o r a c mo m v v - a E N a d '° > a o x s $ w ~ v ., o a ¢ o m " mo aE v `m Naa c a o ¢ o � o T, o -3°0 -vo ° w a n v o .'^• o. 3 E v o a E E o-Z." a v o o - v 'o w ° o o - _ _ c « c o° w 3 t0 w w c a ¢ ° 0 a > 3 3 E v E a E E 3 0 oa o r n v c v r u a v w n - �n u° c° a - u w Y ° v - _ o IT 0 p'>� u h o v w E \ 0 a d 'o w `o > - o Im _ - - - 3u m ° -� ° a o " O o y - � � � � a m � _ 0 a v m 0 � c o 3 0 � N J a = " m a u ° a ° 8 w v c 0 c Q M O N � r � u_ � N N C W L 11 C _ O 0 Q \ C \ O lu MO o o a a m\ p s u u �n a s u E z° a o w w LL w w w w w H F ry o o ry >x ° r s o v Q > °o a m y n E L o.x oaw o m °3 E m E -�ao E u o no m mo 2 y ' ° o u � c o - \ i o d v l7 a v U a rvp p > - n 9 3 ° c -m 3 co u ry ¢ to m N 0 w �. o ti Y 0 E 3 vi °ia ° 7 Leo -O w � 0� 3 .. vi - o E .; r Y o o a _ 0 5 N 3 ° v -0E o s z Y 3 v E °.s E o T o ° n 0 C a - ° N N o E 3 E E -O 3 ° c c 3 p w s n `o o a o o w 3 `o_ \ b no °�' me x nL v o co r Y oz x .ns °E ''' o V-o a O _ °oN c w a n - �_ 3 c 'o .- - 0 2: : v u° 2r u > a x m ¢o E o - - om o I. r -o c v `^ h m a U- 3 - o Y w h h v \a t .4°c _ w E u c o 1O 01 0 0 - s o ° `\ E c a u = N = m -tea _ = o o h o w r n ° o ow = = a 0 = - _ °� _ _ ° 3 o w o w ` o a m .o o c - E .o :° p -o c a o E l7 eo E m E W o _ u a c n - - w _ d w w _ u _ m u ¢' a y Im 5 om ° Z v v - - — l M Lyao v o I > y a v a a o u u m �° v v 0 0 u a m m p w v F o S o t� u '• > s u u w a\ \ u c 3 w u E �co ° w �° u ¢ w o 3 u w ° ¢' z v� y o ti `+ ry ry ti .� ry ry O N c O jp o O m ry m V V V1 l0 h 01 ,y y O d C Q .1i 0 ry ry ry ry n'1 V N .-1 .ti M - N N ti ti ti ry ry ry ry � O- rl r � u_ N N C W L po r I¢ m \ _ N \ E 3 O °O Q V 3 Q \ o l7 3 T a o n ¢ 3 v ¢ a3 ° o 0 F o S eu E 2c ¢ � " '7. a a a a v a s a I ;n 0 3 m` It; z° m w w w w ~ w w LL w LL LL w w o v v v w LL w LL � LL w LL LL LL w LL w Lr 0 x ao¢ - E m 0 a 0« o o a � o 0 o -o 3 ° � v m t o 0 w o c o a o ° u u ° Q o o. o 0 o V u v - m T c Yo I°i O O. U m u' E U c o ° 0 o 'o '" I 3 to ry 0 y c v a T 2 - v > c - 0 u 'o � � v « -6 o m o �n c v _ L v vi xc o 1 0 0 c a o m0 o $ w .,', o ¢' m u o F ¢ 3 L v E r 2 ami - o o a -o 0 0 0 o f o w ai L 3 Y ,. o f - E a o 'v' o 0 3 Y U a s o 'o a o c Y3 L 3 0 0 y° u y " o -0- 'a _ Y s a a o c LL 3 o 0 o v v $ _ m _ _ - o °o ro m $ N u c a 3 s ;0 v o r -vo 3 v r _ v o v . a y a -' 3 0 - - E c Q .. Y o - 3 u v' ' o o r m 3 m n ¢ c u ou o v m m om > z � "' u o F o -f0o u 0 m m a c v o o Y '« 'o 0 1 0 o o 'o - y o z o f v o a c 0 0 - \ 3v� xl7 m � a 3 mo zin w ¢' ID ° d m ° > 0 d � a N m a v v v v o M m m m m m N ry ry m m m m m m m m � LL N N C W E L V t0 1+ Q m m m m m m m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w w W W W w w w w w w w w w w w w W w hq b0 EU 00 b0 h9 bq h9 bD by h9 h9 o o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m1. m v v o a a w o o 3 1.a lo U U O Q O Q O o -o o Im 1. �7; IN IN IN m o «co l7 o « u Y- - - U U V '0 u u u V0 N` o oc � a E m Y E o Y Y o v a o v o m m m r Y N C C �' Y r r r p a 3 o a 3 0 ° o o o. o. � o o 0 0 o_ o c oc o v a v ani N a a a v e0 m n9 m o d a d u m m m m o o o .n .o o p _ E non m �' o ,. - o - o m `c° -o Z w C c u o - o - o `c° o co o a o v o n --va ° c _ -°o v m ai v n - « >r �2 z w o v °co° " w w a r +sv' a -vaN Y ° m A o >o Y v `o 15 n `o 3 _ 3 3 M o m a _ m o o 'o 2 v c m s n �, N �, s o ., ., v w G Y o a a 'COo t m SW a. c H y p U U 0 a Q a O N -o c — — Y nno onv o c - � � msbaL o u -°u °1u E u o s 3s c s E s °1 n a y - t� u u v u ao u a n N a v ° o .. v .. v Q y Q Q Q a• Q ='Q Q ._ Q _ a � 'N n 3 -vo 3 c _-o x _ o w r E _ o i o o - w E E .E n. v v Q m r Y Q E o f o 0 o R o c oo." Y ° v y v o L o v r r - o n N R - m m £ v - 3 o 9 m F t o w E v ¢ o v m o a W v d o a uco a _W c - v W _ - v w - N E E o o y o v o v c E ° " 'o uvo ° m r m o c c o EE o Y ¢ o m o `o, - ro E o m E S m E u a ,.a £ a -a a a w a o a v d 3 -�n - cou cou �n �n m° w- ,n v 'O 3v Y o 0 �m 3 0 T m 3 v c o 3 E u o \ o u rc° my o w o � 11 �`� o v > - s E L o o f _ E m E mu o a v o .� a - o \o O °1 o f ` > a °1 a m o N o LL -16a o 3 vvi E v \ > w 3 E 5 on t� v 3 v ¢' = U uxv umou ° W as a, W za' W �LLuuu � w o' W � w a 33 o a s v c 0 `o i c � N N v 00 N m c M mm m m m v No r � u_ N Attachment 3 Parks and Recreation and MIPS Report Requests These projects are referenced for additional awareness. They were either requested by the Parks and Recreation Department or were identified by ACHD, from the Meridian Intersection and Pedestrian Safety Report (MIPS), as needingto be included on the FYR Capital Projects Most of these projects are already in ACHD future project linework;theywere previously not prioritized by the City yet.The TC requested that McMillan, Star to Can Ada, be added to the list as well. 2026 Agency Project Name Agency Project Description City Priority 62 Star Rd,Ustick Rd/McMillan Rd Corridor improvement project which includes widening to five(5)lanes and constructing enhanced pedestrian and bike facilities on the roadway as per the adopted Bike Master plan and the 2020 Capital Improvement Plan(CIP). 63 Star Rd,McMillan Rd/US 20/26 Corridor improvement project to reconstruct/widen from two(2)lanes to five(5)lanes as per (Chinden Blvd) the 2020 Capital Improvement Plan(CIP). 64 McMillan Rd,McDermott Rd/Black Corridor improvement project to reconstruct/widen from two(2)lanes to three(5)lanes. Cat Rd Project includes bike and pedestrian enhancements. 65 McMillan Rd,Star Rd/McDermott Corridor improvement project to reconstruct/widen from two(2)lanes to three(5)lanes. Rd Project includes bike and pedestrian enhancements. 66 McMillan Rd,Star Rd/Can Ada Rd Corridor improvement project to reconstruct/widen from two(2)lanes to three(5)lanes. Project includes bike and pedestrian enhancements. Note:2025 Priority#5, Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd/Linder Rd, dropped to#62 as it will be completed. Compliance Projects 2026 Agency Project Name Agency Project Description City Priority 46 McDermott Rd/Five Mile Creek Install enhanced pedestrian and bicycle crossing safety across McDermott with PHB.This is Enhanced Pathway Crossing part of the well-used multi-mile 5-mile Creek Pathway. Extends underneath SH-16 to the west. 47 Amity Rd/Five Mile Creek Enhanced Install enhanced pedestrian and bicycle crossing safely across Amity with PHB.This is part of Pathway Crossing the well-used multi-mile 10-mile Creek Pathway network. 48 Black Cat Rd/Ten Mile Creek Install enhanced pedestrian and bicycle crossing safely across Black Cat with PHB.This is part Enhanced Pathway Crossing of the well-used multi-mile 10-mile Creek Pathway network. 49 NW 3rd St,Rail with trail to Connection needed from the rail with trail to Broadway. Broadway Ave. 50 Eagle Rd/Overland Rd,Evaluate bike Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,evaluate bike turn medians,and bike ladders facilities 51 Fairview Ave/Lakes Place,Evaluate Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,evaluate crossing improvements on west leg. Crossing Improvements 52 Cherry Ln/Lauderhill Way,Evaluate Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,upgrade directional ramps and improve crossing Crossing Improvements angles. 53 Locust Grove Rd/Locust View Way, Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,install pathway crossing across Locust Grove. Enhanced Pathway Crossing 54 Fairview Ave and Records Way, Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,install pedestrian refuge island on Fairview Ave. Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing 55 Ustick Ave and Records Way, Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,evaluate removing passive lefts and extending Evaluate Crossing Improvements protected left signal on all legs. 56 Overland Rd and Stoddard Rd, Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,evaluate bike improvements including medians, Evaluate bike facilities ladders,or other enhancements. 57 Ten Mile/South of Park Creek, Per MIPS report,and ACHD staff direction,replace signal with a pedestrian hybrid beacon. Evaluate Crossing Improvements Install pedestrian refuge islands. 16 44 44 44 37 37 37 0 37 Z �M1 f '�Chinden•� 26 54 60 31 9 VAR McMillan ° 65 64, "43 55 � 9 4, c� ! �r 2 19 Cherry /ry J/J 21 ld Fairview 20 32 28 Pine 4,���;Itl -84 I - - _ L rn -° o v 4�W li Victory 51 35 12 , 4 I� 57 22 7 1 26 25 15 50 50 III rr I49 _ Amity 15 50 49 56 Lake Hazel �r - 69 e •_ _ Columbia Capital Projects Prioritization Map 05 1 Miles Print Date:2/11/2026 C/V L E IDIZ IAN,— User:bmcclure �� 16 44 44 22 ^b � — Chinden ' 26 r /`19 ' Usti %/``�/� �42'����� `I� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NOR PRI®•' 222� ���q' IIIIIIIII 6;ASIF airv,411 fI j Franklin. 84 Overland c v a A � �� � / IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 27 Lake Hazel �r - 69 �••_ _ / Columbia Compliance Projects Prioritization Map 05 1 Miles Print Date:2/11/2026 User:bmcclure �� Project Name:Project Description:How important is this project to you? Amity Rd and Locust Grove RdBuild a multi-lane roundabout one (1) lane for 1 - Important the northbound and southbound legs and two (2) lanes for the westbound and eastbound legs per the current adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting. Amity Rd and Locust Grove RdBuild a multi-lane roundabout one (1) lane for 1 - Important the northbound and southbound legs and two (2) lanes for the westbound and eastbound legs per the current adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting. Amity Rd and Locust Grove RdBuild a multi-lane roundabout one (1) lane for 1 - Important the northbound and southbound legs and two (2) lanes for the westbound and eastbound legs per the current adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting. Chinden-McMillan Bikeway (Phase Establish a new bikeway corridor on select 1 - Important 3), Black Cat Rd / Linder Rdstreets per the Bike Master Plan. Treatment options to be determined. Eagle Rd, Hubbard Rd / Columbia Add an interim pathway per the South 2 - Neutral Rd - Interim PathwayMeridian Neighborhood Plan. East 03rd St, Franklin Rd / Carlton Build sidewalk, bike facilities and upgraded 3 - Not Important StADA ramps on both sides of the roadway. Project includes an improved Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) crossing. East 03rd St, Franklin Rd / Carlton Build sidewalk, bike facilities and upgraded 3 - Not Important StADA ramps on both sides of the roadway. Project includes an improved Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) crossing. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove RdWiden the east and west legs of the 3 - Not Important intersection to nine (9) lanes and the north and south legs to seven (7) lanes per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding APS (accessible pedestrian signal) with LPI (leading pedestrian interval), pedestrian and bike facilities and intersection lighting. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove RdWiden the east and west legs of the 1 - Important intersection to nine (9) lanes and the north and south legs to seven (7) lanes per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding APS (accessible pedestrian signal) with LPI (leading pedestrian interval), pedestrian and bike facilities and intersection lighting. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove RdWiden the east and west legs of the 1 - Important intersection to nine (9) lanes and the north and south legs to seven (7) lanes per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding APS (accessible pedestrian signal) with LPI (leading pedestrian interval), pedestrian and bike facilities and intersection lighting. Fairview Ave and Locust Grove RdWiden the east and west legs of the 2 - Neutral intersection to nine (9) lanes and the north and south legs to seven (7) lanes per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding APS (accessible pedestrian signal) with LPI (leading pedestrian interval), pedestrian and bike facilities and intersection lighting. Franklin Rd and McDermott RdBuild a signalized intersection. Project 3 - Not Important includes pedestrian and bike facilities and intersection lighting. *Project cost excludes Canyon County's portion of the project cost. Franklin Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Widen/realign the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-3 - Not Important Cat Rdthru lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd / Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Cloverdale Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes replacing the bridge over the Ten Mile Creek and adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd / Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 3 - Not Important Cloverdale Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes replacing the bridge over the Ten Mile Creek and adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd / Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Cloverdale Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes replacing the bridge over the Ten Mile Creek and adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd / Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Cloverdale Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes replacing the bridge over the Ten Mile Creek and adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd / Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Cloverdale Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes replacing the bridge over the Ten Mile Creek and adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Lake Hazel Rd, Eagle Rd / Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Cloverdale Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes replacing the bridge over the Ten Mile Creek and adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Overland Rd / Franklin Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridges #1200 & #1537, adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway and two pedestrian crossings at Waltman St & Ten Mile Creek Rd. *Project coordination with Idaho Transportation Dept (ITD). Linder Rd, Pine Ave / Ustick RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Linder Rd concept study, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the North Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Linder Rd, Pine Ave / Ustick RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Linder Rd concept study, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the North Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Linder Rd, Pine Ave / Ustick RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Linder Rd concept study, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the North Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Linder Rd, Pine Ave / Ustick RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Linder Rd concept study, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the North Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Linder Rd, Pine Ave / Ustick RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 3 - Not Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Linder Rd concept study, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the North Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Linder Rd, Pine Ave / Ustick RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Linder Rd concept study, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the North Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Linder Rd, Pine Ave / Ustick RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Linder Rd concept study, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the North Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Locust Grove Rd and Palermo Dr Install a signalized pedestrian crossing at 1 - Important Pedestrian CrossingPalermo Dr. Project includes upgrading the ADA ramps, pavement markings and street lights. Locust Grove Rd Bridge #1207, Replace the existing bridge #1207 over the Ten 1 - Important 0.17 miles S/O Victory RdMile Creek as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Widen the roadway to eitehr four (4) or five (5) 1 - Important Ustick Rdlanes (2-thru lanes in each direction, center median and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Concept study will determine ultimate configuration of the roadway/layout. Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Widen the roadway to eitehr four (4) or five (5) 1 - Important Ustick Rdlanes (2-thru lanes in each direction, center median and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Concept study will determine ultimate configuration of the roadway/layout. Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Widen the roadway to eitehr four (4) or five (5) 1 - Important Ustick Rdlanes (2-thru lanes in each direction, center median and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Concept study will determine ultimate configuration of the roadway/layout. Locust Grove Rd, Fairview Ave / Widen the roadway to eitehr four (4) or five (5) 1 - Important Ustick Rdlanes (2-thru lanes in each direction, center median and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Concept study will determine ultimate configuration of the roadway/layout. McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Build a multi-lane roundabout with two (2) 1 - Important Roundaboutlanes for the northbound/southbound legs and one (1) lane for the eastbound/westbound legs per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting and the reconstruction of bridge #1394 over the Lemp Canal. McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Build a multi-lane roundabout with two (2) 1 - Important Roundaboutlanes for the northbound/southbound legs and one (1) lane for the eastbound/westbound legs per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting and the reconstruction of bridge #1394 over the Lemp Canal. McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Build a multi-lane roundabout with two (2) 1 - Important Roundaboutlanes for the northbound/southbound legs and one (1) lane for the eastbound/westbound legs per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting and the reconstruction of bridge #1394 over the Lemp Canal. McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Build a multi-lane roundabout with two (2) 1 - Important Roundaboutlanes for the northbound/southbound legs and one (1) lane for the eastbound/westbound legs per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting and the reconstruction of bridge #1394 over the Lemp Canal. McMillan Rd and Black Cat Rd Build a multi-lane roundabout with two (2) 1 - Important Roundaboutlanes for the northbound/southbound legs and one (1) lane for the eastbound/westbound legs per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes pedestrian and bike facilities, pedestrian crossings on all legs (RRFB's) and intersection lighting and the reconstruction of bridge #1394 over the Lemp Canal. McMillan Rd, Linder Rd / SH 69 Widen the roadway to three (3) lanes (1-thru 1 - Important (Meridian Rd)lane in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding pedestrian and bike facilities on both sides of the roadway. Meridian Rd and McMillan RdEvaluate the intersection operation to 1 - Important determine if additional lanes are needed. Meridian Rd and McMillan RdEvaluate the intersection operation to 1 - Important determine if additional lanes are needed. Meridian Rd, McMillan Rd / US Widen the roadway to either three (3) or five 1 - Important 20/26 (Chinden Blvd)(5) lanes depending on the results of a concept evaluation. Project to include pedestrian and bike facilities on both sides of the roadway. Project includes evaluating crossing opportunities at Mountain View Dr. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 2 - Neutral Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2026)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 3 - Not Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Please refer to the FYP interactive map for exact locations. Safe Sidewalk Program (2027)Install/improve select sidewalks throughout 1 - Important Ada County. Projects may include installation of ADA accessibility improvements, fill critical sidewalk connections, bulb-outs, bikeway signage and crossings. Improvements are located throughout the County on multiple roadways. Locations to be determined. Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Reconstruct/widen the roadway to three (3) 1 - Important Rdlanes, build curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, upgraded ADA ramps, and street lights as per the adopted South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes bike lanes, a signalized pedestrian crossing across Victory Rd at Stoddard Rd and widening of Bridge #2085 over the Ridenbaugh Canal. Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Reconstruct/widen the roadway to three (3) 1 - Important Rdlanes, build curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, upgraded ADA ramps, and street lights as per the adopted South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes bike lanes, a signalized pedestrian crossing across Victory Rd at Stoddard Rd and widening of Bridge #2085 over the Ridenbaugh Canal. Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Reconstruct/widen the roadway to three (3) 1 - Important Rdlanes, build curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, upgraded ADA ramps, and street lights as per the adopted South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes bike lanes, a signalized pedestrian crossing across Victory Rd at Stoddard Rd and widening of Bridge #2085 over the Ridenbaugh Canal. Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Reconstruct/widen the roadway to three (3) 1 - Important Rdlanes, build curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, upgraded ADA ramps, and street lights as per the adopted South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes bike lanes, a signalized pedestrian crossing across Victory Rd at Stoddard Rd and widening of Bridge #2085 over the Ridenbaugh Canal. Stoddard Rd, Victory Rd / Overland Reconstruct/widen the roadway to three (3) 1 - Important Rdlanes, build curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, upgraded ADA ramps, and street lights as per the adopted South Meridian Neighborhood Plan. Project includes bike lanes, a signalized pedestrian crossing across Victory Rd at Stoddard Rd and widening of Bridge #2085 over the Ridenbaugh Canal. Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel RdBuild a single lane expandable roundabout per 1 - Important the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes multi-use paths and pedestrian crossings (RRFB's) on all legs, intersection lighting and replacing the two (2) existing bridges over the Mason Creek Feeder Canal on both Lake Hazel Rd and Ten Mile Rd. Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel RdBuild a single lane expandable roundabout per 1 - Important the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes multi-use paths and pedestrian crossings (RRFB's) on all legs, intersection lighting and replacing the two (2) existing bridges over the Mason Creek Feeder Canal on both Lake Hazel Rd and Ten Mile Rd. Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel RdBuild a single lane expandable roundabout per 3 - Not Important the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes multi-use paths and pedestrian crossings (RRFB's) on all legs, intersection lighting and replacing the two (2) existing bridges over the Mason Creek Feeder Canal on both Lake Hazel Rd and Ten Mile Rd. Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel RdBuild a single lane expandable roundabout per 1 - Important the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes multi-use paths and pedestrian crossings (RRFB's) on all legs, intersection lighting and replacing the two (2) existing bridges over the Mason Creek Feeder Canal on both Lake Hazel Rd and Ten Mile Rd. Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel RdBuild a single lane expandable roundabout per 1 - Important the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes multi-use paths and pedestrian crossings (RRFB's) on all legs, intersection lighting and replacing the two (2) existing bridges over the Mason Creek Feeder Canal on both Lake Hazel Rd and Ten Mile Rd. Ten Mile Rd and Lake Hazel RdBuild a single lane expandable roundabout per 1 - Important the adopted Capital Improvement Plan. Project includes multi-use paths and pedestrian crossings (RRFB's) on all legs, intersection lighting and replacing the two (2) existing bridges over the Mason Creek Feeder Canal on both Lake Hazel Rd and Ten Mile Rd. Ustick Rd and McDermott RdWiden all legs of the intersection per the 1 - Important Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) with the realignment of McDermott Rd. Project includes adding APS (accessible pedestrian signal) with LPI (leading pedestrian interval), pedestrian/bike facilities and intersection lighting. Ustick Rd and McDermott RdWiden all legs of the intersection per the 1 - Important Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) with the realignment of McDermott Rd. Project includes adding APS (accessible pedestrian signal) with LPI (leading pedestrian interval), pedestrian/bike facilities and intersection lighting. Ustick Rd, McDermott Rd / Black Widen the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important Cat Rdlanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted North Meridian Neighborhood Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd / Linder RdWiden the roadway to five (5) lanes (2-thru 1 - Important lanes in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted North Meridian Neighborhood Plan and the Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Project includes adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. Victory Rd, Glacier Bay Way / Mesa Build sidewalk on the south side of the 1 - Important Wayroadway. Victory Rd, Locust Grove Rd / Widen the roadway to either three (3) or five 1 - Important Eagle Rd(5) lanes (thru lane(s) in each direction with center medians and turn pockets where appropriate) per the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Project includes replacing bridge #2117 over the Ridenbaugh Canal and adding multi-use pathways on both sides of the roadway. A Concept Study will be conducted to determine final treatment. Please explain your ranking of this project.TabName Getting out of neighborhood and the time it 2026-2030Kristin Raney takes to get through this intersection is insane. Please help us With growth exploding in south Meridian this 4 Beyond 2030Andrew Peterson way stop is a serious bottle neck. It was used as an alternative route when Eagle was closed between Amity and Lake Hazel. With the up coming projects and growth It will be used as an alternative again. this can't come soon enough. this intersection Beyond 2030Katherine is in my immediate area and the traffic backs steinhauser and people block the intersection so we can't get out. since you can't fix this 2030 can we have a light? Adding additional bike lanes will reduce the size Beyond 2030Dallas Millington of the road and is generally not needed in the neighborhood as they have large paths to be used by bikes. Please describe an interim psthwayyBeyond 2030Jerrie Stevenson NO more bike lanes, wheelchair sidewalks, or Beyond 2030Kellie large sidewalks. Stop with that. We just need ALL ROADS IN Ada county Widened No more bile lanes, or wide sidewalks. JUST Beyond 2030Kellie WIDEN ALL THE ROADS IN ADA COUNTY Quit it with the stupid idea of more bikes! How Beyond 2030Kellie about No more bikes!! STOP THE NONSENSE !! Honestly, stop it. Widen the lanes that VEHICLES DRUVE ON. This will help stop the road range of traffic issues. Whoever designed the roads on the boise bench like Kootnei and Rosehill needs to be shot. Honestly, please stop the madness. No wonder there is so much Road rage in Ada county! Crazy busy areaBeyond 2030 Need to widen Locust Grove all the way to Beyond 2030Louise ONeil Redd Chinden. I go through this intersection several times a Beyond 2030Cindy Thorngren month on my way to the Crunch workout gym. Haven't had too many problems although as I'm not there during rush hour I can see how that extra traffic would overload everything. Quit it with the bike lanes, there is Not that Beyond 2030Kellie many bikes. Just widen the ROADS Creating yet another unneeded 5-lane road is Beyond 2030Jake Anderson not in Ada County taxpayers' interest. With the intersection almost done at Eagle and 2026-2030Diana Woods Lake Hazel, this should be next on the agenda as traffic gets necked down on Lake Hazel to one lane each way. I wish you would stop prioritizing 2026-2030Mary Ann Lawford "bike/pedestrian" paths, which are rarely used, in favor of adding lanes on streets like Maple Grove and/or Five Mile because our traffic has gotten out of hand and we have 3000 + homes approved for the area south of us. ACHD has chosen to abandon SW Boise almost entirely when it comes to helping with our traffic flow and it's really outrageous. Perhaps the legislature will dissolve ACHD. Wishful hoping. Morning and evening commutes are Beyond 2030Tangi Winters unbelievably slow. I don’t understand why Boise road widening is so many years behind! Please push this project forward- my work commute will be greatly improved. As you know, south Meridian and Kuna are Beyond 2030Pete Szobonya growing very fast. Completion of the Lake Hazel Rd corridor to the east of Eagle Road will greatly help in the movement of traffic as well as provide connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists.. The addition of continuous sidewalks and bike lanes along this corridor will greatly improve safety. Please do what you can to move this project up in your Five Year Plan. I live in the middle of this project. I'm really Beyond 2030Cathy curious about why you want to know how we feel about it. What difference does it make, you have already decided what you're going to do and when you're going to do it. It makes not one bit of difference what we think, what we feel or how important it is. Your decisions and your indifference to the fact that you just keep allowing subdivisions to go in with no infrastructure in place has caused all of this. Now u want to know how we feel. Congestion is painful every morning and Beyond 2030Kurt Ostwinkle evening here on my commute and this should be done in 2026. It would be better to make Cloverdale 4 lanes from Overland to Kuna Mora last week as this would improve trafic flow more. From someone that commutes this every day the north south routes are the biiger bottle neck to commuting traffic in these neighborhoods I live in the subdivision directly connected to 2026-2030Leah Z. Linder Road and will have faster access to Overland with the new connection and overpass. I think this is fantastic that you guys will be 2026-2030Michael completing this in 2026 and 2027. Me and my McFadden wife built a new house here in the area just a quarter mile from this intersection overland and linder and we've been waiting for this project to be completed. With all the growth out in this area it would be a vital artery to relieve some of the congestion on Meridian road in overland. It's got an extremely bad just about any time of the day. I try to avoid that intersection usually on most days. Linder is the only access to Primrose 2026-2030Debra subdivision! Please open a temporary or permanent road connecting Verbena St to the 10 Mile Crossing Development so we have another access while Linder is under construction I use Linder daily to come and go from my houseBeyond 2030Brad Tarter I use this road most days to come and go from Beyond 2030Brad Tarter my house. The roadwork for W Verbena doesn't take into account that ALL the busses from Peregrine Elementary use that road. Not very often do they use Walman as that is where all the parents drive. Busses heading north onto Linder from Verbena will not make it across the road without causing accidents. The hard median through parts of this will cause significant piling of cars on the Linder. I live in this area and want to know about Beyond 2030Casandra timelines for construction and upcoming road closures to the neighborhoods. Traffic in South Ada County is getting worse by Beyond 2030Stephanie Stout the day. Before adding more subdivisions, in the south side of the county, please improve the roads leading there! This will lessen the load of traffic in Meridian Beyond 2030Becky Klemm road & ten mile roads. This has been needed for ages I see no future planning for Linder expansion. Beyond 2030Bob White Once the overpass is complete to link the north area to the south and the numerous new subdivisions currently being built and housing built and populated going into Kuna. The usage will require it to be a 5 lane from Overland to Kuna old town. Police and fire departments built to support. Best plan, fund and complete by 32 to ensure infrastructure stays up with the Kuna boom town expansion over the next 10 years. With the completion of the Linder/I-84 overpass 2026-2030Mike Perry and widening of Linder Road from Overland to Franklin the traffic on Linder Road will greatly increase. This will create a bottleneck on Linder between Pine Ave and Ustick Road. This stretch is already heavy, especially during rush hour traffic and when Meridian High School dismisses. Please consider moving this project up to be completed before 2030. I would include this near the top as traffic on 2026-2030Brent Havens this road is already above capacity. I see your schedule is beyond 4 years from now which is crazy. The two lanes now are dangerous to bicyclists Beyond 2030Jana Shepherd and pedestrians. Traffic backs up during peak times. When the new overpass is finished the traffic will be worse. Emergency vehicles can’t get thru if traffic backs up. Need fixed same time as the overpass road. Because of the Linder extension to Overland, Beyond 2030Michael Walling this project should be done sooner than later to handle the extra traffic McMillan Rd between Locust Grove and Ten Beyond 2030Stacey Jones Mile needs to be addressed before this stretch of Linder. I live near McMillan and N Summit Way. There isn't a turning lane on McMillan. At this intersection, I constantly see cars pass on the right side of cars turning left off of McMillan. This creates a serious risk for a head on collision. I understand having access between N and S Meridian by way of Linder, but this is going to cause more congestion on McMillan and an increased risk of accidents. 1 - HIGHLY Important - already sent in another Beyond 2030Samantha Tallman survey. But this was removed off of the next few years and I wanted to see why, if possible. Linder goes from five lanes to two lanes to five Beyond 2030 lanes is causing traffic congestion, road rage and unsafe driving. You’re adding an overpass without widening Linder that is already a mess and more people are going to use it causing more traffic issues. Pedestrian safety on locust grove needs Beyond 2030 improved. the roads in my area need to widen. the south Beyond 2030Katie side of meridian is growing and roads are't keeping up I feel this project should be moved up. The 2026-2030David Henchman traffic between the two roads is getting worse every year, often taking three rounds of red lights heading north to get past Ustick. We live on the NE corner of Ustic and Locust 2026-2030Fred Helm Grove. This project has been proposed since 2017 I believe and the traffic has gotten worse and worse. There are times in the late afternoon that it is almost impossible for us to get out of our subdivision on to Locust Grove. There are several schools in the area and when they let out, along with work traffic, it makes it very dangerous and difficult! You have kept changing the construction date or 8 or 9 years, and it just keeps getting worse I live in the Chateau Meadows Subd and am the Beyond 2030Carrie Pasewalk Residential Manger of the Chateau Meadows HOA. Any changes will directly affect me both personally and as the HOA manager. The HOA owns property along Locust Grove that will be impacted/lost by widening the road and the Board of the HOA and myself need to be involved during public and adjacent property input - prior to the design phase and most certainly during the land acquisition process. The traffic on this stretch of road makes it Beyond 2030Jeremy impossible to leave the subdivision. There will also be more accidents due to the increased traffic using this as a thruway, rather than taking a subdivision route. I live in this area and it’s agonizing waiting for 2026-2030Jason La Mar someone turning left especially during busy hours. I live out there, and traffic is ridiculous with the 2026-2030David Bear stoplight and no turn lanes! This needs to happen sooner rather than later, and PLEASE MAKE IT Two lanes east and west as well!!! One lane wouldn’t be enough now, and it is certainly not going to be enough as we continue to grow. Let’s look ahead. I love that you are putting a round about here Beyond 2030Amanda Matlock since I live on mcmillan and my house faces the traffic. But can we please reduce the speeds in the suburbia. Everyone goes 50 and there are multiple schools with kids walking in the area. We can't even safely cross mcmillan without almost getting hit. I like the project, I just think if you are doing 2 Beyond 2030Steve Hall lanes N. and S. you need to do 2 lanes E. and W. while you are doing the project anyway. You are already there and traffic isn't getting any lighter, just makes more sense. There is plans for more subdivisions in the area that will be using McMillan Rd. The light at the intersection causes extreme Beyond 2030DeVon Orr backups if anyone wants to make a turn due to it being a one lane intersections with no turn lanes. The design seems like it was rushed and no one took into consideration how many cars make turns at this corner. I’d rather have the 4 way stop back at times. When Black Cat at Ustick is complete the traffic and back ups will be worse. This intersection can be very dangerous for children riding bikes, walking, and/or trying to cross the street. This project needs to be adopted yesterday. Beyond 2030Brent Havens The amount of traffic and pedestrian traffic is really high. I can understand the desire to not wanting to move forward quickly as the irrigation canal issues may see an expensive adventure, but this road is in bad need of repair and widening. should be consided to 5 lanes with center lane rather than a bandaid of 3 lanes. McMillan road constantly has traffic. The Beyond 2030Melanie congestion gets worse when drivers are making left turns into neighborhoods and business parking lots. At least a middle lane is needed. Please evaluate. This road is regularly backed up from 4:30-6:00 Beyond 2030Tifini Young in the evenings with traffic heading west all the way back to Locust Grove road. I live in an adjacent neighborhood and only use neighborhood roads to navigate the area during those hours. This used to be on the plan for the next couple Beyond 2030Tiffany N Terry- of years. What happened? Have you driven Hughes these roads when school is in session? People have driven into the ditch on McMillian on multiple occasions. These roads get super backed up. I was almost hit in the Meridian and McMillian intersection. These roads need to be widened ASAP before things get worse. Need a roundabout for parents to get out of the parking lot too. This exact spot went from immense horse 2026-2030Joshua Folger traffic to wire s but of for traffic in the last 5 years. This sidewalk is very necessary. Anything that improves safety for pedestrians 2026-2030Paul Wardwell and bikers is important. The roads weren't made for cars alone. They also have a huge obvious safety advantage when it comes to potential safety issues. I use this area quite a bit. Even with a four way 2026-2030Lynn Oliver stop. It's still challenging walking across the street. The cars really want to accelerate. Also would like it more bike friendly. I'm glad to see these investments in sidewalk 2026-2030Jake safety. Please complete them ASAP. This so so important! Thank you so much!2026-2030Levi Schoonover All of my kids will be going to Owyhee high 2026-2030Amanda Matlock school and now that the highway goes above Mcmillan it is very important that kids can walk to school on a sidewalk from ten mile and Mcmillan to Owyhee Drive with no not sidewalks like it currently is. Also the speed limit is way too fast thru a neighborhood area it's 45 and people are always actively walking we can't even walk to Walmart or cross the street without possibly getting hit every time. It shouldn't be this way when it's 25 downtown. The sidewalk that finishes the circle of the Hyatt 2026-2030Jacq Wetland Reserve neighborhood needs to be finished on Mountain View between Mitchell and Maple Grove. It's a dangerous piece of road to walk! I have contacted your department numerous times and was told it will be completed this year (I hope). It will be a huge improvement and used by many going up and down the hill on a safe sidewalk!!!!! This short piece of sidewalk will be greatly appreciated! My children and others walk through this area 2026-2030 frequently. All important. Non-car traffic important2026-2030Kurt Martyn Important because the sidewalk was never Beyond 2030Star Moxley replaced during two years of construction during the Grove St project and is in dire need of being replaced and poses an unsafe walkway. My one hope is that this project is scheduled early in the year of 2026 and NOT anywhere Sept, Oct, Nov or Dec because the previous ongoing construction almost closed the business, Crazy Neighbor, which depends a lot on gross sales during Halloween as well as the Christmas season. I walk through here often and would love the Beyond 2030Luke Schaefer extra piece of mind The safety and walkability of this area is crucialBeyond 2030Jess briggs What are you doing at this location, specifically?Beyond 2030Roger M Brazier There are several stretches of street in the area Beyond 2030david wilkins with no sidewalk. Given the number of children walking to school and having to walk in the street, safe walkability needs to be a priority. My family would benefit from safer sidewalks in Beyond 2030Erin McKerracher this area cycling safety is importantBeyond 2030 Walkability makes a neighborhood.Beyond 2030Steve Rinehart Excited for improvements here!! This Beyond 2030Jonathan Rayner intersection is a busy/ critical one for cyclists/ pedestrians in the area.. I previously lived in an area where bulb-outs Beyond 2030Earl Fish were built. I cannot see how these are helpful to pedestrians and traffic flow. As a driver, they create an additional barrier and distraction to safe driving. They are a wasteful use of funds. Please do not build any more of these in our neighborhoods! Inconsistent sidewalk availability throughout Beyond 2030Ryan Miller the area is one of the biggest problems, imo. I walk that area every week and crossing Victory 2026-2030Ann Ferrell from Stoddard is dangerous and getting worse with all the new neighborhoods. This project is essential, and truly needs to be Beyond 2030Cori Strasser expedited so it can be completed sooner rather than later. Traffic in this area has greatly increased, and it is not safe for the middle school students. The crossing at victory should be high priority, and needs to be implemented as soon as possible in order to provide a safe crossing for the students and other pedestrians. We use Stoddard instead of using Meridian Beyond 2030David Pryor Road since Meridian Road has become ridiculously busy with all of the traffic heading to Kuna! Where do I leave a comment? I commented on Beyond 2030David Pryor this project about 2 years ago and never heard back from ACHD? Where's the project details? An actual signal for vehicles would be great Beyond 2030 here since kids that are crossing the road for school and the traffic turning left has gotten so extreme with all the new neighborhoods. A simple cross walk is sometimes dangerous because cars turning onto the road cannot see if the crosswalk is active or not. That's why I'm not a fan of the crosswalks at both ends of Kodiak. Cars turning from Kodiak to Linder or Stoddard cannot see the crosswalk lights and have no idea if it is active or not. Traffic frequently backs up during the evening 2026-2030David L Allen rush hour from Lake Hazel to Amity. South Ten Mile as a whole should be a higher priority for widening because of the interchange and multiple new subdivisions either right on Ten Mile or by those that use Ten Mile for freeway access. This is already a bottleneck for morning and 2026-2030Kelly Frew evening traffic. With the potential of a new Costco going in just east of this intersection, this project will become even more important and should be considered to be expedited. Roundabouts are awful!2026-2030Kellie Build a multi lane round about like you are 2026-2030Nate Howard planning at Deer Flat and Ten Mile. Why build an expandable roundabout that will be too small most likely from the beginning. Just build it like it should be so you don't have to come back and "Expand" it. I would think the feasibility of just making multi lanes to begin with would outweigh coming back and doing it over. I use 10 mile every day. This roundabout and 2026-2030Calvin Comin every roundabout on 10 mile should have two lanes going north and south. Even the road should be 4 lanes like it is between Victory and Overland. This intersection is very busy during the evening Beyond 2030David L Allen commute time. I think all of Ten Mile, south of Victory to Kuna, should be a priority. The numerous housing projects, along with the interchange with I-84, have led to a lot of traffic that the old two-lane "country" road can no longer handle. Having two major east-west routes under Beyond 2030Karen Richey construction at the same time makes it VERY difficult! (This one as well as Franklin Rd PLUS the RR crossing between the two) Hopefully both routes will remain open most of the time to lessen the impact on traffic since an alternate route for Franklin Rd is mostly this route. I know it's hard to balance the need to do the projects with the needs of the commuters and residents. Thank you for the opportunity to give input! It’s good to get sidewalks to make getting Beyond 2030Becky klemm around more accessible & safe without a car It’s been forever since Blackcat can cross 2026-2030Jason La Mar Ustick. The rough road on Ustick isn’t the best either. Needs to happen though I hope it will be faster 2026-2030Jason La Mar than Ustick & Blackcat. This is a very dangerous section of the road for Beyond 2030Mike MacDonald pedestrians due to the lack of sidewalk and the hill that blocks drivers' view of any pedestrians crossing on the south side of the road. this needs to be yesterday. the amount of Beyond 2030Katherine traffic in south meridian has increased but the steinhauser roads haven't CitySubmitted Date and Time Meridian1/22/2026 19:58 Meridian1/25/2026 12:51 Meridian2/19/2026 3:13 Meridian1/23/2026 18:19 Meridian1/23/2026 15:29 Meridian1/23/2026 7:15 Meridian1/23/2026 7:27 Meridian1/23/2026 7:30 Meridian1/24/2026 15:11 Meridian1/26/2026 1:38 Meridian2/18/2026 7:26 Meridian1/23/2026 7:25 Meridian1/23/2026 4:03 Boise, Meridian1/22/2026 20:08 Boise, Meridian1/22/2026 20:08 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 18:27 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 21:58 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 22:26 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 23:34 Meridian1/22/2026 20:07 Meridian1/22/2026 21:30 Meridian1/23/2026 0:56 Meridian1/27/2026 2:05 Meridian1/27/2026 2:07 Meridian1/29/2026 17:04 Meridian2/18/2026 17:51 Meridian2/18/2026 18:11 Meridian2/18/2026 19:45 Meridian1/22/2026 22:07 Meridian1/23/2026 2:53 Meridian1/23/2026 12:48 Meridian2/18/2026 18:39 Meridian2/18/2026 18:54 Meridian2/18/2026 20:58 Meridian2/19/2026 12:51 Meridian1/30/2026 16:21 Meridian2/19/2026 3:09 Meridian1/22/2026 20:03 Meridian1/22/2026 20:11 Meridian1/28/2026 22:02 Meridian2/18/2026 19:31 Meridian1/23/2026 3:42 Meridian1/23/2026 6:01 Meridian1/23/2026 15:39 Meridian1/26/2026 13:47 Meridian2/19/2026 5:01 Meridian1/23/2026 2:57 Meridian1/23/2026 4:55 Meridian1/28/2026 20:18 Meridian2/19/2026 1:55 Boise, Meridian1/22/2026 21:18 Boise, Meridian1/22/2026 22:32 Boise, Meridian1/22/2026 22:42 Boise, Meridian1/23/2026 3:06 Boise, Meridian1/23/2026 3:08 Boise, Meridian1/23/2026 15:33 Boise, Meridian1/23/2026 15:53 Boise, Meridian1/23/2026 22:27 Boise, Meridian1/24/2026 2:30 Boise, Meridian1/26/2026 20:25 Boise, Meridian1/27/2026 4:20 Boise, Meridian2/1/2026 20:48 Boise, Meridian2/4/2026 1:06 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 17:55 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 18:21 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 18:53 Boise, Meridian2/18/2026 20:12 Boise, Meridian2/19/2026 3:29 Boise, Meridian2/19/2026 6:04 Boise, Meridian, 2/18/2026 18:17 Ada County Meridian1/23/2026 16:15 Meridian1/30/2026 0:19 Meridian2/18/2026 18:55 Meridian2/18/2026 18:58 Meridian2/18/2026 21:17 Meridian, Kuna1/22/2026 20:27 Meridian, Kuna1/22/2026 21:12 Meridian, Kuna1/23/2026 7:19 Meridian, Kuna1/23/2026 13:12 Meridian, Kuna1/23/2026 15:21 Meridian, Kuna2/18/2026 17:49 Meridian1/31/2026 19:24 Meridian2/18/2026 18:14 Meridian1/23/2026 3:45 Meridian1/23/2026 3:46 Meridian1/23/2026 19:39 Meridian2/19/2026 3:16