The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About872 Wesley Subdivision AZ '--:YYl1/uAr la:'L/ RECORDED' REQUEST OF tOll. c.-.r,;U~i ry REc'OR<<R'7'~( ~ !!I/ , rl'.\I'r'l 'J^V~R~O ~ ~J. ~J,'~~';::! i,'H ~~ II . D~PU":'V .1, .. " .11.' "",j IE!=', 'I' "'1.....__1 ~ ,"l.E "fJ. - - - 2000 AP 27 MnO: 08 '(5 I 0 0 0 3 I 7 2 2 fl p CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 81z...- AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT CERTAIN LAND LIES CONTIGUOUS OR ADJACENT TO THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF MERlDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAI-IO; AND FINDING THAT THE OWNER HAS MADE A REQUEST FOR ANNEMTION IN vVRlTING TO THE COUNCIL; AND THAT SAID LAND BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF MERiDIAN AND ZONING DESIGNATED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R. 8) AND LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT (L-O); AND DECLARING THAT SAID lAL'JD, BY PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BE A PART OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ORDERS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; Al'.JD DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ADD SAID PROPERTY TO THE OFFICIAL!vlAPS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO; AND DIRECTING THE CLERI( OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO FILE A CERTIFIED COpy OF THE ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE AREAS TO BE ANNEXED WITH ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AUDITOR, TREASURER AND ASSESSOR, AND THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE SECTION 50-223 AND SECTION 63-2215. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. FINDINGS: That the following described land is contiguous and adjacent to the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for annexation to the City of Meridian, Idaho, by the ovvner of said Property to-wit: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-8) A portion of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 6, Tovvnship 3 North, Range I East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-OO-002) - 1 Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 6, which bears S 00010'20" E, 2,641.31 feet from the east quarter corner of said Section 6; thence N 00010'20" W 1,320.19 feet (formerly described as N 00008'20" E, 1,320.42 feet) along the easterly boundary of said Section 6 to the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 6; thence S 89030'00" W, 216.06 feet along the southerly boundalY of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 6 to the Real Point of Beginning: Thence continuing S 89030'0011 W, 765.86 feet (formerly described as S 89052'W) along the southerly boundary of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 6 to the southeast corner of Meridian Place Subdivision No. I, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Ada County Recorder; Thence N 00007'00" W, 259.32 feet (formerly described as North 257.37 feet) along the easterly boundary of said Meridian Place Subdivision No. I to the southwesterly boundary of Gem Park Subdivision, as sho'wn on the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Ada County Recorder; Thence S 81053'30" E, 298.93 feet (formerly described as S 8 P35'301t E, 298.92 feet) along the southwesterly boundary of said Gem Park Subdivision; Thence N 89003'5011 E, 468.58 feet (formerly described as N 89021 '50" E) along the southerly boundary of said Gem Park Subdivision; Thence S 00030'00" E, 218.13 feet along a line perpendicular to the southerly boundalY of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 6 to the Real Point of Beginning. Comprising 3.940 acres, more or less. Subject to easements or right~of-ways of record or apparent. AND ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-OO-002) - 2 LIMITED OFFICE (L~O) A portion of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 6, Tovvnship 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 6, which bears S 00010'20" E, 2,641.31 feet from the east quarter corner of said Section 6; thence N 00010'20" W, 1,320.19 feet (formerly described as N 00008'20" E, 1,320.42 feet) along the easterly boundary of said Section 6 to the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 6, which is the Real Point of Beginning: Thence S 89030'00" W, 216.06 feet (formerly described as S 89052' W) along the southerly boundary of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 6; Thence N 00030'00" W, 218.13 feet along a line perpendicular to the southerly boundary of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 6, to the southerly boundary of Gem Park Subdivision, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Ada County Recorder; Thence N 89003'50" E, 217.32 feet (formerly described as N 89021'50" E) along the southerly boundary of said Gem Park Subdivision to the easterly boundary of said Section 6, , Thence S 000 I O'2011 E, 219.79 feet (formerly described as S 00008'20" W, 219.00 feet) along the easterly boundary of said Section 6 to the Real Point of Beginning. Comprising 1.089 acres, more or less. Subject to easements or right-of-ways of record or apparent. SECTION 2: That the above-described real property be, and the same is hereby annexed and made a part of the City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-OO-002) - 3 SECTION 3: That the real property herein by this ordinance annexed to the City of Meridian hereinabove described shall be zoned Medium Density Residential District (R~8) and Limited Office District (L-O). SECTION 4: That the City Engineer is hereby directed to alter all use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps, comprehensive plan and all official maps depicting the boundaries of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 5: The zoning designation set forth in Section 3 of this ordinance is subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Development Agreement by and between the City of Meridian and the owner of the land described in Section 1 dated the .I g-r.!i day of ~ ,2000, and that the uses are to be developed under the planned unit development process and conditional use permit process. SECTION 6: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herevvith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. SECTION 8: The Clerk of the City of Meridian shall, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance, duly file a certified copy of this ordinance and a map prepared in a draftsman manner plainly and clearly designating the boundaries of the City of Meridian, including the lands herein annexed, with the following officials of the County of Ada, State of Idaho, to-wit: the Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-OO-002) - 4 Assessor and shall also file simultaneously a certified copy of this ordinance and nlap with the State Ta.'( Commission of the State of Idaho, all in compliance with Idaho Code s63- 2215 and S50-223. p~ BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ~ , 2000. , APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ~/ ,2000. /\ . , ! .I ''if... /8 - day of '8 j11, I -day of .: J STATE OF IDAHO,) ss. County of Ada. ) On this Ig.f'~ day of ~ ' 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRlE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the CITY of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and y,ear first above written. .... -. m .. ~ tJ .. .~~ --:.--~9~.... ~ .~""V.- 0 T~', ,. (SEAL) l~/ ~ .A \ \ NOT PUBLIC FOR IDAHO :001 *'.. '* l~: RESIDING AT: ftl,vVt dltclA I (b \ , ", ~. ~~~Atm;;(C,~'/ Oil MY COlvllvlISSION EXPIRES: q-J-b..-oo MSG\Z:\WOrk\M\Meridi~.. ~~:::"~l!;,l~~W;;:lW:ord ".4'~OF:iP~.. .......... ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (AZ-OO-002) - 5 CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN To; The Recorder, Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor of Ada County, and The State Ta.x Commission of the State of Idaho I, vVILLIAM G. BERG, JR., City Clerk, of the City of Meridian, Ada County, State of Idaho, do hereby certify that the attached copy of Ordinance No. 872, passed by the City Council of the City of lvleridian, on the ~ day of /.t3~ , 2000, is a true and correct.copy of the original of said docuntent which is in the care, custody and control of the City Clerk of the City of Meridian. \\\\\111111//111 \\\\ M- III ,......\.! Of t:RiO/ //1// ,,"" ..t..... ~~'1 ...... ...." ~ "\ 0 ~1'A. .-;.. ~ (j _0-:;'1' RA)'J 'Y ~ :: .?->\.... <to -:;. ~ ",. 0::- ~ ~ County of Ada, ) (SEAL) On this ftom day of tJpn' ( , in the year 2000, before me, t0vle-lW f? ~ttf"n'2--Z , a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM . BERG, J ., known or identified to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. s...."" .. tJ &. ..~~:..--~9':J/.~~ o~~~OT4.i"~-~li"" III~' -.;;- .;... '\~ >a -::x:' ...Al.. ~ ~ IN'" :001 Jill( p::f ~ I>: . \ : g III \ , .. III ... I ., (l ... A~. C I 4;1- (I <.P~'...:UBL1t-:{,."O .. .. ~,..:;---~ EV"6.. ..-<~OFIP o. cr.qIlIllQQ-eo. F 12 Nota ublic for Idaho Commission Expires: 1/2b( ()f) msg\Z:\ W ork\M\Meridian 15360M\Centers Subd\CertificationOfClerkOrd CERTIFICATION OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN - \ '^' '''10 '~ ~ '^' "Xl',' I /]' "XII' I I \ 1= V I-- I-- - - }--- ~= 3^,,1 A lImns N - - - ~'- J~I- ;. ~ 39[lI~H9n"'1 N -..{ ~ ld"--- @r - "'\ \f--- 3Il~N I- ~- - z I- a lJr- aff= f- \ ~= I;; r\'-- '" ~..J '--- .., ~ ' t .. <:l n.,------ ld _ ~ ~ lJ.p[J/'\~J.9.~NN - ~ a ~ f-- '--- >--- '" ~ wt-- / f- '--- i5 ~ I-- t:l~ :z;!'-....... '--- t} g - - ~I-- >- " " g I I :it. SS3NHJOl N8 '- ~ All'" t \ ~ ~ / / 10 f- -LiD/ _~_ ~\ w _ _ 7>i["~Yrf= I ~ - ,j Iz "-J I \ v~ I Y -~I ld lSAH1~ ~ ...... '-...... 3.oo~~~~os 3A'" .., 1SAH13HII ;~ltL ~ttJ ;. !'" 311IHdd"'~SO' ;:. ';><1-/,<,: f- "'l- i'- I-- .., I- J' 4- -- ~W ~ - ;0: I--- - ~ f--- 0 , __ _ f- ~ ~ ___\w 3A'" NDJIHZ N .-,---- ~/1 III1 t J -1 ,----,::> .., ~ r-- ...--- ~ I u It' Yo", ~ ~~ ld 311lHdd~~ ~~ I J !-' ~r., tli:i ~f{; J~ ~~E'6~ f\,-CD,lO...ooN ld NOJlIIZ .... ()-~ o _ 19~ z I'--- V I I- j~1 1-, A\lI'. J nu.."".,,. ........ ? g:, ~3 ~~ aOO/'\31dd\iN /' f- .., ..J o '" ...: u z \. \D(\j -f'.. urn w ww u WZ ..---l<[ a::::z l--l ....~ Za:::: ~D ~ 1S 10b''''J :3 1S 101l\iJ /'\ r I j rr~ ~ - t-\'t Mayor ROBERT D. CORRIE HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499 . Fux 288-2501 City COllncil Members CHARLES ROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITH BIRD 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433' Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Fax (208) 888-4218 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTMENT (208) 887-2211' Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 . Fuz 887-1297 To: Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City E~ineer ~ Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator ""S-;;;r January 5,2000 FJ~CEI\lED JAN 06 ?nnn MEMORANDUM: From: City of Meridian City Clerk Office Re: Request for Annexation and Zoning of5.029 Acres from R-T to L-O (1.089 Acres) and R-8 (3.940 Acres) by Centers Construction We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council. The property included in this application is located in an area designated as Mixed/Planned Use Development in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Property to the north and west is zoned R-8 in the City of Meridian. Doris Subdivision, an Ada County subdivision, is located south of the property and is zoned R-8. Immediately east of this property across Locust Grove is a large lot zoned R-4 (owned by Don Bryan), and kitty comer to this parcel across Locust Grove are the Star-It storage rental units and the Fred Meyer complex. Although Doris Subdivision was developed as large lots due to the fact that municipal services were not available at that time, Ada County's R-8 zoning district allows 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre with hookup to municipal services, and the minimum lot size allowed is 6,000 square feet. The requested zoning of L-O will provide a desirable buffer from Locust Grove for the residential use. The requested R-8 zoning is compatible with the surrounding zoning and uses. This property was the subject of a prior annexation application for a project proposed as Grove Run Subdivision in January 1995. Although a rough subdivision layout was submitted with the annexation application, no comments on the plat or planned unit development are included in this memorandum. The appropriateness of annexation and zoning with the requested zoning districts are the only things under consideration at this public hearing. A preliminary plat application and conditional use permit application for a planned development have been submitted, but have not yet been processed. If the applications are complete, they will be heard at the February meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission. The development narrative submitted with the annexation application includes details on the proposed preliminary plat and PUD. AZ-OO-002 Ccnlers.AZ.doc P&Z Comrnission/Mayor & Council January 5, 2000 Page 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project shall be tiled per City Ordinance 12-4-13. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association, with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 2. Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems within this parcel will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. SITE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Any development of this property shall be conducted under planned unit development procedures and as conditional uses. 2. A development agreement could be required as a condition of annexation, or the annexation ordinance could include a provision that all uses are to be developed under the planned unit development process. The Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council will be able to set specific criteria for landscaping, fencing, signage, etc., as part of the approval process, which approval will run with the land. 3. Provide a minimum landscaped setback of20 feet beyond required ACHD right-of-way on Locust Grove Road. Buffering of adjacent properties from the office use will be reviewed as part of the conditional use pennit. COl\t1PREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES The subject property is located in an area designated as MixedIPlanned Use Development in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The 1993 Comprehensive Plan contains a variety of goals and policies that are relevant to this application. Sta:lfhas selected the following sections that most directly apply to the proposed project. Goals Section Goal4: To provide housing opportunities for all economic groups within the community. Goal8: To establish compatible and efficient use ofland through the use of innovative and fimctional site design. Goal 9: To encourage a balance ofland use patterns to ensure that revenues pay for services. Goal 10: To create an Urban Service Planning Area which is visually attractive, efficiently managed and clearly identifiable. AZ-OO-002 Ccntcrs.AZ.doc P&Z CommissionllvIayor & Council January 5, 2000 Page 3 Economic Development Chapter 3.1 U - Approve quality housing projects that meet the needs of all economic levels. 3.2U - Encourage efforts to develop and maintain quality neighborhoods and housing. . . Land Use Chapter Goal: All land use development in the Meridian area will be considered an asset to the community and not detract from our quality of life. lAU - Encourage new development which reinforces the City's present development pattern of higher-density development within the Old Town area and lower-density development in outlying areas. 1.8U - Promote the development of high-quality and environmentally compatible residential areas that contain the necessary parks, schools and commercial facilities to maintain and form identifiable neighborhoods. 2.1 U - Support a variety of residential categories for the purpose of providing the City with a range of affordable housing opportunities. 2.3U - Protect and maintain residential neighborhood property values, improve each neighborhood's physical condition and enhance its quality of life for residents. 2AU - Encourage sidewalks and paved streets for all existing neighborhoods... 2.5U - Encourage compatible infill development which will improve existing neighborhoods. 5 .16U - All development requests will be subject to development review and conditional use permit processing to ensure neighborhood compatibility. 5.17U - A variety of coordinated, planned and compatible land uses are desirable for this area, including low- to high-density residential, office, light industrial and commercial land uses. 5.18U - Existing residential properties will be protected from incompatible land use development in this area. Screening and buffers will be incorporated into all development requests in this area. Transportation Chapter Local Streets: Serve primarily to provide direct access to abutting residential units and should be for local traffic movement. They are generally two lanes with parking with a right-of-way width of about 50 feet. Service to through-traffic is discouraged. The remaining transportation corridors of the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area are recommended for local street status. 1.2U - Achieve a local transportation system connected to all modes of the regional transportation system. l.4U - Monitor and coordinate the compatibility of the land use and transportation system. 1.19U - Encourage proper design 0 f residential neighborhoods to ensure their safety and tranquility. Housing Chapter 1.4 - The development of housing for all income groups close to employment and shopping centers should be encouraged. AZ-OO.002 Centers.AZ.doc P&Z CommissionfMayor & Council January 5, 2000 Page 4 1.6 - Housing proposals shall be phased with transportation, open space and public service and facility plans, which will maximize benefits to the residents, minimize conflicts and provide a tie-in between new residential areas and service needs. 1.9 - The efficient use of land for public facilities, transportation systems, utilities, and the economic arrangement of buildings should be promoted. 1.12 - Land development regulations should be revised to encourage the infilling of existing vacant parcels within the city limits. 1.13U - Infilling of random vacant lots in substantially developed, single-family areas should be considered at densities similar to surrounding development. Increased densities on random vacant lots should be considered if: a. The cost of such a parcel ofland precludes development at surrounding densities; b. Development of uses other than single-family structures are compatible with surrounding development; c. It complies with the updated Comprehensive Plan. 1.14 - Design and performance standards should be applied to infilling development in order to reduce adverse impacts upon existing adjacent development. 1.15 - Owners or remnant residential parcels or partially-developed residential parcels should be encouraged to consolidate these properties where possible to prevent the proliferation of small parcels of vacant land within the city limits. 1.19 - High-density development, where possible, should be located near open space corridors or other permanent major open space and park facilities, and near major access thoroughfares. Community Design Chapter 6.1 U - All Meridian neighborhoods will be served with sidewalks, curb and gutters, and functional streets. 6.2U - Pedestrian access connectors will be required in all new development to link subdivisions together to promote neighborhood identity. 6.11 U - Promote well-planned and well-designed affordable housing in all Meridian neighborhoods. AZ-OO-O02 Centers.AZ.doc MAYOR Robert D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 . Fax (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fax (208) 888-4218 LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288-2499' Fax 288-2501 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING DEPARTIvfENT (208) 887-2211 . Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533 . Fax 888-6854 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Ron Anderson Keith Bird Tammy de Weerd Cherie McCandless September 17, 2001 Idaho Power Company 10790 W. Franklin Road Boise, 10 83709 322-2000 388-2402 *Oena 388-2021 fax 388-6924 388-6532 fax 322-2032 Re: Street Ughts for Wesley Subdivision The street lights have been installed by the developer in Wesley Subdivision. These are 100 and 250 watt high-pressure sodium lights on steel poles, owned by the City of Meridian with a maintenance agreement with Idaho Power. The three (3) street lights are located at: 250w Lot 1 Block 1 N. Locust Grove Road & E. Wi/lowbrook COUlt Lot 5 Block 2 E. Wi/lowbrook Court Lot 15 Block 2 E. Willowbrook Court Please use this letter as your authority to activate these street lights. See attached map for additional information. Sincerely J/~ William G. Berg, Jr. City Clerk Enclosures ----.. OFFICIALS HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN WIUIAM G. BERG. JR.. City Clett< JANICE L SMITH, City Trsasuror GARY O. SMITH, P.E.. CIIy Engineer BRUCE D. STUART. Water Worl<:s Sup!. JOHN T. SHAWCROFT, Waste Water Supt. DENNIS J. SUMMERS, Paries Sup!. SHARI L Sl1LES, P & Z Administrator PATTY A. WOLFKIEL, OMV Supervisor KENNETl-l W. BOWERS. Are Chief W.L. "SILL" GORDON. Pollee Chief WAYNE G. CROOKSTON. JR., Attomey 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83642 Phone (208) 888-4433 . FAX (208) 887-48 \3 Public WorksIBuilding Department (208) 887.2211 MOlor VehiclelDrivers License (208) 888..4443 ROBERT D. CORRIE Mayor MEMORANDUM: To: Will Berg, City Clerk Bruce Freckleton. Assistant to City Engineer From: Harold Hudson, Electrical Inspector Re: STREET LIGHT ELECfRICAL INSPECfION :-q. c~lt"ME~~RS WALT W. MORROW, President RONALD R. TOLSMA CHARLES M. ROUNTREE GLENN R. BENTLEY P & Z QOMMISSION JIM JOHNSON, Chairman MALCOLM MACCOY KEITH BORUP RON MANNING BYRON SMlrn Date: 9'-/ z.. -to / RECEIVED SEP 1 4 200t CITY OF MERIDIAN I have inspected ~ ~ca1 wiring and associated components for ? street lights in I-tJ I ~ _ ) . Idaho Power Co. can now proceed with e activation. .' Harold Hudson. Electrical Inspector T_ c_. ~~____.. __.~~.".~.._~~ _n. ,~ __c_,.____. .-.--~~--~--~... C:\OFFlCE\WPWIN\GBNERALIBLEQNSP.MMO "", ~ ~ ~.~'~, (~!'Ao:JD~S~J?l ~~ V;, L~ ).!~, ~. 0;'0 m <-:,j .. It ~~ I"') .., ~ ~ 0 ,",0 ...., ~ 01 :; N ~ ..v n~r " ~ '"I ~ ~ ~ ~ N i v., 0 - ~ 'J:l .. ------ ~-+--"WV -... Zl< :::... 1--: l;:: t ~l:' -;? ~ '-..: -; ~, ./ '" ~ v ~ y ~ ------- I If ~ ~ ~ m ~8: .., < ~ ~ ~ &lw ;:'\ .... <Q t.j(.) 'TNO- QCj t;~~~ III U <D ,,1Il ~ ...10-7.- 'io! .~ D:~Go.;~ !~]Z6: ~ l!~ti~ - ~ ~ < . ~ ::;~~ ~ - i lll-:-~ -:w -~ ~ - " ~;;, g ;: () > J: ,2 0 "l .a ~. . ~ 0 a:::: i:i (O:"'<i - 'V tl: !l!';: ~O (,\ gl/i t:l 0 .-wO<( ~ OU 1-. r_U ~__...J ~ ~ .~ l;:; ~ 0 Il. l' .",,-~O~~. r-a:-===- :'( _'::!' j '! ~ ,~O '-:z: 2 z ;:;: Z ~ ~0=--I~Q~1"') i!~ .!l')- "'::l: ~ ~ 0 - ~ ~ 9~ ib hs ~ . ~ i t) (/) ~....... .!...J ~,... ~ 0 ~. l. J..~ : ~ ~ ~! ~ - C( ~ v: ;.... ~ ';L - J " a ...J ~ lj V) ~ ..... ~ .] ;r ~ \ ..2. __}... '\ j , .. -'1 t , i i i "'T ! ... ~~. t ~.: ~~'I - ~'I ~ It d ~; I Q, ~ t ...; ~+ ~ ~ 1-.. . l~ !<> .it "Q .; ~ ' c,t : ~j r g ~- A If) N '\ : G ~~ ." 1) , ~ ~ ~ o o~~ /~ ~ ~ : ytl/ I! ~ '"' r. . 't"t1-1- I ; ~-~ ~ "J. C1. ;;. ..'" ---.: "t '-.J, - N If) .. .... 0 'l.i" oJ....... :l -';'~ ~ ~ ~ J "'" ..... ~ r'I"'''' ~ v' u I" (,Q ,.A vi '''' --..;. - a.; ~ .... U,~ :r.~ JP'b N .:; . Q. <' r') "'" ! ~ '<t - <D \- 2 i ":l & ;0;;:'3 \j - ~*l , (XJ '<t r'1 ..c; V" ....-"'1: I: -:i" ,?r 4~ - ~ ..--L:; ...'" (XJ ~CD ij f' 1.0 ! ~., - I -< V'" --.-~ .... ' - I ok. ~m If) J: -~ a~ a Uu ... ;;:; ... . . " ~ . . ~ . . . .. . . . . . 4 MMNNNNn~~~MNNN~~NN~. ~~!~~~~~~~~!g~,~~~.a.. Cl .. ~ : .: r') ~ .3 w 5 .... Cl :'l z w ~ ...I 5 !Xl <t u :; c >: Z :J :J ~ Cl Cl! " l.:l ., Cl! W c ~ Z :J 0"0 ......... .....,....... " <D 00 ~ ~ 8 ~ ~~o~~a~~~O~~~QN~Q~_. ,', " :: "'... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~-- v ro ( A \ ) ;U", coco ;;~~~ 0"" ....".... ...... "00 ~:;-::; N '''u "'" ~~ "" w... ~~ N<U . . ~~ ~~~~~: .~.,;.' .. " .. o 8 e:- N.., ~'T 8 o z "1 I ~~ - C) ~ 0 G ~ -I ~8 0 ~ Z u &l1l>~, ~ ~~ ~~ l.J ~ " ~ or & ~ 5 ~ . . .. . :: &888 - w . ..J C5 ~ ~j; (I) 0, 3"1 Q. ~ 1 ;:( ~ :::s ~ i "'" '" 0:: ~ C:l 0:: 0 ~ R: 0 l;:;: ci t.) 0:: r..l ~ - it ~ --- .. -. " o o uaootAH 24 HOUR INSPECTION LINE 887-1155 ....,n.y VI IIII'I;;II....IQII, I..IUIIUIII!::j Ult:pcU LlIIlt:IIL 660 E Watertower , Suite 200 Meridian 10 83642 PH 887-2211 f FAX 887-1297 Elec-Commercial Permit Permit Number: ELC2001-117 Applicant Streetlights Page 10f 1 Printed: 05/30/2001 Parcel Number: PARC2001-9 Address: WESLEY SUB. Addition: Contractors Electrician F & SElectric Address: 3411 Hillcrest Dr. Boise, Id 83705 Lot(s): Block: Phone: 867-1287 FAX: 383-4803 Fees and Receipts: Number FEE2001-9917 Total Fees: Amount $111.00 $111.00 $111.00 $111.00 Description Electrical-Commercial RCPT2001-3231 Total Receipts: Other Fields: Value: Description: Fees Due I Credit Info: 4100 2100 watt located at 5/2,9/1 and a 250 watt located at 1/1 RECEIVED MAY 3 t 2001 CITY OF MERIDIAN April 13, 2000 AZ 00-002 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 18, 2000 APPLICANT Centers Construction, Inc. ITEM NO. J REQUEST Development Agreement - annexation and zoning of 5.029 acres to L-O and R-8 - west side of Locust Grove 1/4 mile north of Fairview Avenue AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: See attached signed D/ A j11urV ../) (lfP tJ I I ~$V INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Materials presented at public meetings sholl become property of the City of Meridian. A~CtVvvt V\C0 ~ Le-1vo ;XA f -Iv fi!..e.co rc:f...br { "II d,7/ {)cI ! . ~,";~~,_..:: April 13, 2000 AZ 00-002 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPLICANT Centers Constructir'~/ !nr:., 'c"'''; April 18, 2000 ITEM NO. 2 ...,/.::-~.i REQUEST Ordinance - anr .tion'and zoning of 5.029 acres to L-O and R-8 west side of Locust Grov . mile north of Fairview Avenue AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: See attached Ordinance riLi, 'f., C1[']["Y vj? r ~1'V rl~ riff^! INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: JrA rP / Materials presented ot public meetings sholl become property of the City of Meridian. WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GJORAY, III BRENT JOHNSON D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WilliAM A. MORROW WilLIAM F. NICHOLS" CHRISTOPHER S. NYE PHiliP A. PETERSON STEPHEN L. PRUSS ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVIO M. SWARTLEY TERRENCE R. WHITE"" 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288.2501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA. IDAHO 83653.0247 TEL (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466-4405 Em"il via Intemel @wfg@wppmg.colll 'ALSO ADMITTED IN OR "ALSO ADMITTED IN WA PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE R~ C-" ~~' 7-'~"-'."" Ij lj . '\ t ;}..,~ t! ',.' I. ,~ ~f ;;. ;\\tD JU.E.. ", J.'J,U ~ 11- I I March 10, 2000 CITY OF NillIW[)If~ William G. Berg, Jr. Meridian Citv Hall 33 E. Idaho Street Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: CENTERS CONSTRUCTION AZ~00~002 / ANNEXATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE (R-8 AND L-O) Dear Will: Please find enclosed the above ordinance for the annexation and zoning for Centers Construction. Please place this ordinance on the City Council agenda. This ordinance should not be passed until the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order Granting Application for Annexation and Zoning are adopted. Additionally, I did not include any of the conditions of development set forth in part 3 of the Decision and Order, due to the fact that it is my opinion that annexation and zoning ordinances should not contain conditions other than a reference to a development agreement if so ordered. A development agreement was requested in this matter so I have fashioned the language in the Decision and Order to address the conditions of within the Development Agreement and that the property is to be developed under the planned unit development process and conditional use permit process. Please supply this letter to the Mayor and Council for their consideration of these Findings and Ordinance. If you have any questions arise, please advise. Very truly yours, ~ MARCH 3. 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: MARCH 7.2000 APPLICANT: CENTERS CONSTRUCTION AZ 00-002 ,r-r'"' AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: L- REQUEST: FINDINGS ~ ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 5.029 ACRES TO L-O AND R-8 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHW A Y DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS SEE ATTACHED FINDINGS .fA 't'JI ~I~ 11'/ plf fL/' yo\! rYr? tr/O OTHER: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. gg6~ VJG60 ~ 'J!Clc!C 1\ 0 I Oll*,y +hJtf'p . 0(20 I (}7) fnA-- WHITE. PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE KLEIN FISCHER WM. F. GJORAV, 111 BRENT JOHNSON D. SAMUEL JOHNSON WILLIAM A. MORROW WILLIAM F. NICHOLS' CHRISTOPHER S. NYE PHILIP A. PETERSON STEPHEN L. PRUSS ERIC S. ROSSMAN TODD A. ROSSMAN DAVID M. SWARTLEY TERRENCE R. WHITE" 200 EAST CARLTON AVENUE, SUITE 31 POST OFFICE BOX 1150 MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 TEL (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288-2501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 247 NAMPA, IDAHO 83653.0247 TEL (208) 466.9272 FAX (208) 466-4405 'ALSO ADMITTED IN OR "ALSO ADMITTED IN WA Em.it via Internet @: wfg@'lI'ppmg.com PLEASE REPLY TO MERIDIAN OFFICE D l"ilr-; R T~\, '-Ci y) lr', 8'j(J"-- j,., 'I f) D. \\Ip-- ~'--~.JJ...jJ /"" March 10,2000 J it CITY OF William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk MERIDIAN CITY HALL 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Re: CENTERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. / ANNEXATION AND ZONING FINDINGS, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, RESOLUTION AND CERTIFICATE OF CLERK CASE NO. AZ-OO-002 Dear Will: Please find enclosed the original of the FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FORANNEXATION AND ZONING prepared as per instructions from the Council meeting of March 7, 2000, and which are on the agenda for March 21, 2000. I have also attached the originals of the Resolution and Certificate of the Clerk for the Development Agreement for owner/developer's signature. I have also attached hereto the Development Agreement for the above matter. After the Council meeting of March 21, 2000, if Council approves the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for the above matter, then the Findings will need to be attached to the four Development Agreements as Exhibit "B". March 10, 2000 Page 2 After the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order Granting Application for Annexation and Zoning have been adopted, please submit the Development Agreement to the owner/developer for signature. Very truly your ---~ /'" ~m. F. Nichols msglZ:\Work\M\Meridian I 5360M\Centers Subd\FFCL and DevAgtClk.ltr MARCH 3, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: M;(RCH 7, 2000' APPLICANT: CENTERS CONSTRUCTION AZ 00-002 AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 5.029 ACRES TO L-O AND R-8 AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHW A Y DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: 0' uI/f SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: COMMENTS SEE 2/15/2000 ITEM PACKET ~r,"I(A! JP ; ~ jrJl{ . 9 b.fi~ Iv ~! OTHER: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. No ULl( 1v t\.pp{; L MJ - ~ho /,l.(j. h.cwt ~ PC<L u r 3( If' 5~ FEBRUARY 11, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 15, 2000 APPLICANT: CENTERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 10 REQUEST: ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 5.029 ACRES TO l-O AND R-B AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: SEE ATTACHED RECOMMENDATIONS CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: 'l tY rtv 1 /fJ J ~/ MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. 0n 1N1V ~ - C( () 00 l.ef + I'VI-S"t. WHITE, PETERSON, PRUSS, MORROW & GIGRAY) P.A. ArroRNllYSATLAW JOUE KLErN FISCHER WM. F. G1ORAY, In D. SAMUaJOIlNSON Wn..LIAM A. MORROW WILUAM F. NICHOLS CHroSToPllER S. NYE Plm.w A. Pm'ERSON STEPHEN L. PROSS ERIC S. RoslJ.'JAN TODD A ROSSMAN DAYlDM. SWARTUiY TERRENce R. WII11"E Tn. (208) 288-2499 FAX (208) 288.2501 NAMPA OFFICE 104 NlNTIl A varuESolJ'lll POST OFFlell Box 247 NAMPA. IDAHO 836S3-OZ47 TEl... (208) 466-9272 FAX (208) 466-44()5 200 EAST CARLTON AVgNUE POST OFFICE Box 1150 tvlBRIDIAN, IDAHO 83680-1150 PLEASE RRPI,Y TO MERIDIAN OFFICE E-MAiL: dms@wppmg.com D lfT1 ,~ 1Ff1 -0~Vr-r:l ~ir~1,_ .ot ~~f ~-U ~~~ 4. -'~, JCLdLj To: Stare' Applicant! Affected Property Owner( s) FEB - 2 2000 Re: AZ-OO-002 City Council Hearing Date: February 15,2000 crrJl OF MERIDIAi'T FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Please note that these Findings and Recommendations of the Plarming and Zoning Commission shall be presented to the CifJ Council at the public hearing on the above referenced matter by the Planning and Zoning Administrator. Due to the volume of matters which the CifJ Council must decide, and to ensure your position is understood and clear, it is important to have a consistent format by which matters are presented at the public hearings before the City Council. The City Council strongly recommends: 1. That you take time to carefully review the Findings and Recommendations of the Plarming and Zoning Commission, and be prepared to state your position on this application by addressing the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and 2. That you carefully complete (be sure it is legible) the Position Statement if you disagree with the Findings and Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Position Statement form for this application is available at the City Clerk's office. I t is recommended that you prepare a Position Statement and deliver it to the City Clerk prior to the hearing, if possible. If that is not possible, please present your Position Statement to the City Council at the hearing, along with eight (8) copies. The copies will be presented to the Mayor, Council, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Public Works and the City Attorney. If you are a part of a group, it is strongly reconunended that one Position Statement be filled out for the group, which can be signed by the representative for the group. Very truly yours, Enclosure ey/ -f"'" BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION ) AND ZONING OF 5.029 ACRES ) CENTERS SUBDIVISION ) ) BY CENTERS CONSTRUCTION ) ) Case No. AZR000002 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL B ~ 2 2000 LV1EIUDIA1V 1. The property is approximately 5.029 acres in size and is located at the west side of Locust Grover north of Fairview. The property is designated as Centers Subdivision. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Centers Construction, Inc., of PO Box 518, Meridian, Idaho. 3. Applicant is the owner of record. 4. The property is presently zoned by Ada County as Rural Transitional (R~T), and consists of a large vacant lot. 5. The Applicant requests the property be zoned as Limited Office (L~O) and Medium Density Residential (R~8). 6. The subject property is bordered to the north by residential development and city limits of the City of Meridian are adjacent and abut to the west, north and east of the subject property. 7. The property which is the subject of this application is within the Area of Impact of the City of Meridian. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - I ANNEXATION AND ZONING R 5.029 ACRES FROM RoT TO LO AND R-B CENTERS CONSTRUCTION 8. The entire parcel of the property is included within the Meridian Urban Service Planning Area as the Urban Service Planning Area is defined in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. 9. The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property in the following manner: develop professional offices and townhouses. 10. The Applicant requests zoning of the subject real property as R-8 and L- o which is consistent with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Generalized Land Use Map which designates the subject property as Mixed/Planned Use Development. 12. There are no significant or scenic features of major importance that affect the consideration of this application. RECOMMENDATION 1. The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of the City of Meridian that they approve the requested annexation and zoning as requested by the Applicant for the property described in the application, subject to the following: Adopt the Recommendations of Planning and Zoning Staff as follows; 1.1 Any existing irrigation/drainage ditches crossing the property to be included in this project~ shall be tiled per City Ordinance. Plans will need to be approved by the appropriate irrigation/drainage district, or lateral users association~ with written confirmation of said approval submitted to the Public Works Department. 1.2 Any existing domestic wells and/or septic systems vvithin this project will have to be removed from their domestic service per City Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 2 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 5.029 ACRES FROM R-T TO LO AND R-8 CENTERS CONSTRUCTION Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation. 1.3 Any development of this property shall be conducted under planned unit development procedures and as conditional uses. 1.4 A development agreement could be required as a condition of annexation, or the annexation ordinance could include a provision that all uses are to be developed under the planned unit development process. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council will be ble to set specific criteria for landscaping, fencing, signage, etc., as part of the approval process, which approval will run with the land. 1.5 A minimum landscaped setback of 20 feet beyond required ACHD right-of-way shall be provided on Locust Grove Road. Buffering of adjacent properties form the office use will be reviewed as part of the conditional use permit. Adopt the Recommendations of the Ada County Highway District as follows: 1.6 Dedicate 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Locust Grove Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. 1.7 Provide a $4,400 deposit to the Public Road Trust Fund for the cost of constructing a 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk on Locust Grove Road abutting the site, approximately 220-feet. 1.8 Locate any proposed streets to offset a minimum of 125-feet (measured centerline to centerline) from any proposed/existing streets. 1.9 As required by District policy, restrictions on the width, number and locations of driveways, shall be placed on future development of this parcel. 1.10 Direct lot or parcel access to Locust Grove Road is prohibited. Z:\Work\,M\Meridian 15360M\Centers Subd\AnnexZon.Rec RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL - 3 ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 5.029 ACRES FROM R-T TO LO AND R-8 CENTERS CONSTRUCTION The Idaho Statesman City of"NIeridian -Aceoi"'l! NumtjeiiTrarii:71-------T'ldelitlflcailon - -,~~~- ~- - ---." ~ ~'---_.. - - -- ~ - --- .-' - P,O. BOX 40. BOISE, IDAHO 83707-0040 AiiiOonJ:Ou..;- D'-- .. LEGAL ADVERTISING INVOICE\,(?,Countlng l..le~_ l.J. $49.08 .~~",--_..__.~._~ _r-r"'ll ~ ''"l~nG . ,:.J " "' :.owu ! i 064514 185966 ! CENTERS CONSTRUCTION -bJ;diiie,rBy-~.----"'~rp-:-O-:Nuiiil:).'-------n~at,;----TRunl5iijj.---,~._-~----------~-~_._--, --'- SHELBY NT _;~!'-_t-lUC':f3.:'( 28-"E_~~_'3.lJ~l3y_~_~?q9o_ , Estimated Inches Reallncl1ee CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 E. IDAHO AVE 'MERIDIAN, 1083642-2631 32 LINES # Affidavits Leg.1 Numbe' , 1 6108 ~~ _ _~ . __, ._._ ______.~ ~.., __ ___~~________._~_..l._.~_"___,_,_~____~__ _r"_ _ _ _. _ _~_,. _____~~_ ~~...._ . LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of fI1e City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian w.ill hold a public hearing at the Meridian CIty Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, i Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on Febru- rary 15, 2000, for the purpose of revieWing , and consi~ering the application of Centers COf\structlon, Inc., for the annexation and zoning of 5.029 acres from R- T to L-Q and R-B for proposed Centers Subdivision located at the west side of Locust Grove north of Fairview. '.' A more. particular description of the abOVe property is on file in the City Clerk's office at M~ridian. City Hall, 33 East Idaho ~treet, and 1$ ayallable for inspection dur- ing regular bUSiness hours. A COpy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested per- sons shall be heard at said public hea ring and tl)e puj>lic is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 1 Bth day of January. WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERK Pub. Jan. 2B, Feb. 11, 2000 610B ~ ~ ~"'\t. ',,0 l..LY.l/~....;, ,# '\ ~ ".... -.0 .... ... "JlIot' -Q-Oo ~ ,...... .J' d 'JJ". * ~ <; \\ . ~ ., ' ~ t Ii' :> 'l; /" O~::z: : ~ ...{~ ,.~, ~ K~" ^ 11 ,l ...7 ./ \ ....... .o{l~ ~~ ..~ ':.'f ..".... ........ ~ },~'\l(\'"'\ ~~~ ....... '.... w' ............ii::I...1I"-... JANICE HILDRETH . being duly sworn, deposes and says: That she is the Principal Clerk of The Idaho Statesman, a daily newspaper printed and published at Boise, Ada County, State of Idaho, and having a general circulation therein and which said newspaper has been continuously and uninterruptedly published in said County during a period of twelve consecutive months prior to the first publication of the notice, a copy of which is attached hereto; that said notice was published in The Idaho Statesman in conformity with Section 60-108, Idaho Code as amended, for TWO o consecutive weekly o consecutive daily insertion(s) beginning with the issue of JANUARY 28 and ending with the issue of FEBRUARY 11 , 2000 ~~ o single [8] odd Skip , 2000 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) COUNTY OF ADA ) 55. On this 11 TH day of FEBRUARY in the year of 2000 , br;lfore me, a Notary PUblTC,"'personally appeared .JANICE HILDRETH known or identified to me to be the person whose-name's'ubscdbed to the within instrument, and being by me first duly sworn, declared that the statements therein are true, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same. Notary~~--- Residing at: .____._~_~ois~!..~~h.~_ My commission expires: ,_ .JOII.3j~ NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the City Council of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. on February 15, 2000, for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Centers Construction, Inc" for the annexation and zoning of 5.029 acres from R-T to L-O and R-8 for proposed Centers Subdivision located at the west side of Locust Grove north of Fairview. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 18th day of January. PUBLISH January 28th, 2000, and February 11th, 2000. 1'1.( ') .':.~.~ -~\ , " _---1 ") r f~ --..... .-.- -",~:"+r~",:, ,; 1 T' ') ~...... , '\ , ;.J J 4 IN~~V';S~_ . .....-.........-.... ; p\ C> ! -f~~-C ~_~o-z ~_I I )_ ...;- s N f? ~, 0. c.~ -' , 1,('"~ 'W E ~ "'-"( 0/ PROJECT SITE ~ .- / r_ 2.: '"-/ o rt q:O' V 1-.. t .'~JD ___ w-- E. LOOP LN. .:. oJ: o 2 ct Q:' . .-1.)""---. S sue. \..~t.p.. , ; (~ "\? . . Ii. \I E. S CD 'REceiVED) NOV 2 9 t999 uonejOOs"s'V ~ Planning BUluueld -'P.unwUJ08 AssoClatIon , D ~, ~. "" .;, I..i . CA Rot.. .$ -y-. U - - AREA MAP CENTERS SUBDIVISION R 1999 NOVEMBE ~ _ 300' SCALE: I - NC & A. ENGINEERS. I . ~ .... --~ :5 I ' I 666t 6 '", r--~ ! 03Af303:8 ! " ..." '~ J d B. r- i8 Meridian Planning i Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 22 Brown: I second. Borup: Motion and second I all in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Brown: I would recommend that the applicant for this annexation work with his neighbors on both sides to provide connectivity. Mr. ParIsh's property only being 80 feet wide, I've seen one of those in Boise that ended up still having one house on it and a bunch donkeys and subdivisions coming in on either side and it just makes it impossible for you to do something. It appears to me that the road lines up and maybe your road should go along your easterly boundary but that is something we will look at in the future. When you come back, that is the question I will have about the plat. I am just making information so that there would no be a problem when you come back for your plat. I see you concept here and it concerns me that Mr. Parish's property is 80 feet and yet your not extending the road that was on the south side of Ustick going north. If it was extended similar to what was to the south,it would be able to provide frontage for his property to redevelop and then- Borup: What can he do with 80 feet. He can't put a road down there. Brown: You do a half plus 12 down his easterly boundary. At least it would be better than Mr. Parish ending up with 600 by 80 and those things do happen. Somehow there needs to be some thought taken. Maybe that will come from Mr. Johnson to east of there, but that is a concern that I see right now. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR/ANNE~Tf9?~\~i~~;~~~I&@i~f 5.029 ACRES FROM R-T TO La AND R-8 BY~t::hlm:ERSiC0NST'RUGTIC>f\t; ING.- WEST SIDE OF LOCUST GROVE X MILE NORTH OF FAIRVIEW: B9rUP: Steve. Commissioner Brown. Brown: Mr. Chairman, I form%ly worked on this project. I don't believe there is a conflict. Mr. Centers is no longer my client and I will not financially benefit from that. Borup: So noted. Siddoway: Mr. Chairman and Commissioner's this is a request for annexation of just over 5 acres currently zoned RT in the County. They are asking for a combination of LO and R-8. There is one acres that would be LO and just under 4 acres that would be R-8. It is located along Locust Grove. Probably the most recognizable landmark is the Fred Meyer complex here at the intersection of Locust Grove and Fairview. There is a mini storage here. The Gem Park Subdivision borders the property to the north and Doris Subdivision borders the property on the south. This is a photo of the property taken from Locust Grove, looking west. Staff feels that the proposed LO zone would be a good buffer along Locust Grove, buffering from the commercial uses and transitioning Meridian Planning ar ,.... Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 23 to the residential uses that are existing. There was a concept plat submitted with this one as well, but the annexation and zoning is all that has been requested at this time. That is aliI have. Borup: Any questions from the Commissioner's? Brown: Steve, where is the line located. I guess how far back off Locust Grove is LO. Siddoway: Looks like about 216 feet, I believe that is a measurement from the center line of Locust Grove. 216 feet from the center. Barbeiro: Steve could you back up the plat. Siddoway: I do not have a copy of the plat itself-the concept plan to show on the screen. Brown: 216 feet Steve. How far does that come to like the center line to the northerly culdesac. Siddoway: It roughly makes a perfect square jf you can just envision something about like this for that zone. Borup: Is the applicant here? Canning: Mr. Chairman and members of the commission, my name is Joe Canning. My address is 5505 W. Franklin in Boise. f am employed by (inaudible) engineers and I am here tonight with the applicant on the annexation request. We don't have very much to say as far as the annexation request goes this evening. This is a area that is surrounded pretty much by development. It is rather narrow and deep. It is approximately 220 feet north south on average and of course considerable deeper then that. I believe staff introduced you to the area that it is in. I would just like to stop comments at that point of time to see if the commission has any specific questions of me. Thank you. Borup: Okay Commissioner's. Did you both find the plats in your packet? That should have been in your packets. I think that came earlier. I think that part of it we got in December. END OF SIDE 2-TWO TESTIMONIES MISSING ON TAPE Jenson: How large could it go and still stay within a LO designation. Borup: Are you asking how large of a building. Jenson: For instance, could it be 2 story? Meridian Planning a Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 24 Borup: I would depend on how it is approved with the conditional-and I am assuming we would probably do it with a conditional use permit. That has been our policy in the past so that we would have the option to review the building, the layout, the use, etc. Steve, would you like to comment on how many square feet a building could be on that side of the parcel. Siddoway: Sure, first of all if you want that building on the LO property to go through a conditional use permit, they do -there is a site plan submitted that will be a hearing for it next month. Copies of that are available today at the or tomorrow at the City Clerk's office, here in this building. You can review that. They are submitting a conditional use permit for that because they are doing the entire site as a planned unit development. It could be 2 story. The maximum lot coverage in the ordinance is 70 per cent but a lot could be covered by a building, but that is never possible because of the parking standards they have to have. I would suggest just get a copy of the plan that shows the building and the parking and see if you have concerns. Jenson: The one right now, they have a plat for right now? Siddoway: Yes, there has been a plat and the conditional use permit submitted for consideration next month. Jenson: That is one that I have seen. Personally, I have no problems with that. I figured a doctors office is as good as anything. My concern is, if it has been designated LO, this guys plat falls through and something else comes in. I wanted to know if there- Borup: That is one of the purposes of the conditional use permit. It would be approved for that specific project. Anything else come in they would have be come before the commission at another hearing. Another public hearing and you would definitely be notified. Thank you. Anyone else. Jones: Jay Jones, 1426 N. Carol. J have the two small parcels in Doris Subdivision approximately 300 and some feet that (inaudible) this property. A couple of concerns that you just addressed. My real question is to go ahead and approve this as a R-8 and LO without a conditional use permit and without a preliminary plat, I think is probably a little pre-mature. Maybe it ought to go together so that the whole thing can be reviewed as far as exactly what the development is going to be on this piece of property. I have seen the plat. We have talked with them. They have several things that they proposed and felt they would get back to us on some of the issues, pedestrian access to schools and a couple other things plat related. My only request would be that maybe this be postponed until the plat can be approved at the same time. Borup: Any questions for Mr. Jones? Brown: Do you have a problem with the LO or the R-8. Meridian Planning a. Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 25 Jones: R-8 in conjunction with Gem Park, no. If its similar design to that as the plat is, I'll have ten new neighbors I have a little concern about that. Our subdivision is R-8 but it is county R-8. We have about. 75 per acre. Brown: County zoned it R-8 so that it could change in the future to that higher density. Jones: I think their definition on R-8 then the last time I understood it. Brown: It is real similar. Jones: Is it? Brown: Yeah. You have a problem with R-8 zoning. That is all we are looking at today and I guess I am not really seeing any-we're going to take the plat on its merits and whether it complies with the zone we approve or don't approve. Jones: I guess I was a little confused before I got here. I assumed that Gem Park and Settlers Village were all R-4 just because basically that is the density that they are, but where the zoning is R-8 I guess it is a similar type thing. There is not much to say about that. I would just be concerns that they-likewise the LO comes in as a zoning and anyone can do anything under that zoning rather then be approved as a conditional use permit by what has been applied for. Barbeiro: Jay is there any access from your subdivision here into any of the neighboring roads that children could walk- Jones: Right now the children use my property as well as the gentleman who lives on the corner there in the yellow-(inaudible). Prior it was granted permission for him to use a ditch bank and they still currently use that. Both I and the gentleman on the corner have agreed that we might can work something out to allow access-pedestrian access from Carol Street on over. Right now under Boise School District regulations, our subdivision is a bussing subdivision because of the traffic on Locust Grove, even though we are less than a quarter of a mile from school, if you would. Barbeiro: As this new subdivision comes in you would like to see-I'm guessing because I know where you live and I know the school there-but the children could walk to (inaudible) without having to come around Locust Grove and walk over. Jones: That has been a concern of many of the neighbors in our subdivision. That would be something that we would look at. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman is that something we could take into consideration or should the 2 or 3 neighbors in that group could work out and bring to us. It is a major concern because with the school that sits back here, these children now are essentially walking in mud. With this division here now, the children would have to walk around Locust Grove and come back out to get the school bus right here. Meridian Planning anu Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 26 Borup: I don't know that we can address property off site of the application but I think we certainly can for the property itself. I am not sure what type of agreement, other then an informal that we are talking three separate pieces of property here that this affects. If you are trying to get a permanent easement through into Settlers Subdivision that goes into that culdesac. Is it fenced off from their other property or they just walking through the yards. Jones: There is a barbed wire fence and we have created an access, if you would, a bypass post for the children to get through there. Borup: Once they go across, then they are just walking through their yard. Jones: Their yard is about 6 feet wide right there. The same as where the sewer easement will go. Borup: Oh, there is a sewer easement there now? Jones: Weill think so. That is where the sewer is going to come through at for this project. Borup: Okay, that puts it in a little different light to then if there-Bruce is there a sewer easement -is that where the sewer easement is? Freckleton: It is a storm sewer. However, that is how the applicant proposes sewering this project. Borup: So there needs to be an easement established? Freckleton: Yes. Borup: Would this be similar to other easements? Is that going to be -normally there is a walk path over - Freckleton: That is probably the ideal situation would be that it be incorporated into a pedestrian path. Borup: (inaudible) happen when the sewer easement is connecting two separate roads. Freckleton: Yeah, that way it can be double use. The earlier comment regarding water pressure, I know Gary Smith, our City Engineer, had received some calls. I will follow up with him tomorrow to find out where that went. I was not involved in those conversations but I can definitely check on that. Looking at the plan, I guess one thing I would probably propose to the applicant too is extending the water on through there as well in order to loop the system back to Locust Grove. That will help balance water pressure and hydraulics. Meridian Planning ar Iu Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 27 Borup: Extend the water through that same easement and then have a loop through the project. Something you would be looking at when you see the plat. FreckJeton: That is correct. Borup: If we are still on the subject of the path through the school, it looks like it can probably be accommodated if there can be something from your subdivision. Jones: It would just be the matter of the land -a piece of my land depending how wide that was and what it would have to be to accommodate that. Something we need to work out with the developer. Borup: It looks like it may be worth -finding out the technicalities of what that would entail. I don't know. Any other questions for Mr. Jones. Thank you. Anyone else? Brian: Don Brian. 2070 N. Locust Grove Road. My property is directly east of the proposed R-8 property. I have a problem with the zoning. I have a problem with the R- 8 because the density as you heard from other testimony here, the traffic very big problem out there and which is the reason I have to leave early and go to work or I can't get out on Locust Grove. It is that heavy in the morning and in the evening. Borup: Don, do you realize that the subdivisions on all three sides of this is zoned R-8. Brian: Yes, but do you realize that the Doris Subdivision is all mature one acre or bigger lots and it will never change into an R-8 unless they tear down houses to redo it alL Borup: I do. Brian: If there was never a better place for a transition between R"8 and Borup: R-8. Brian: Well if your talking about two different things. Your talking about Ada County from 50 years ago and your talking about Meridian today. Anybody that drives through Doris Subdivision knows that you've got these huge acreage backyards that abut right to these R-8 developments and the people that come out of that R-8 development, it's so long and skinny they will be lined up along the south side waiting to get out on Locust Grove unless they put a light there. They all ready have a light on Chateau. They are going to end up putting one on Oakcrest, because it is going to tie back into subdivisions back behind the church, if they ever sell that parcel back in there-that one acre parcel back behind the intersection of Fred Meyer and whatever that is. Dixie Lane. All that traffic will eventually come this way once they condemn the guy that is living there. So you going to have a light at each one of those intersections is the only possible way your going to keep traffic moving. They are going to be stacked in this Meridian Planning ar I~ Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 28 development. I live across the street and I will never get out unless I put my own light in. That is a real big problem in that area. I don't know jf Ada County-I know it is not your problem to direct traffic, but if Ada County can't come up with a system to move traffic through there, the R-8 is not a good idea for there in my opinion. Brown: What is a good idea? Brian: I don't have any idea. They tried to move this through here 3-4-5 years ago and it was too long and skinny to do anything with. It use to be a farm land. It had one dwelling on it and they proposed putting duplexes but it was too long-a culdesac length. It is so long and skinny it was undevelopable so that guy sold it to either somebody else that bought it and present owner now owns it from whoever he bought it from. They decided they couldn't develop it then. I don't know what the answer it. You guys-I've got the same problem. I live across the street. I have an acre and a half. What do I do with mine? What is the good use for mine other then what is in now. I've got horses and it is all pasture and a small farm house. That was the original farmhouse for that whole area and they are just closing in around me and all the build up and all the development is building up around me literally-height wise, elevation wise I am in a hole. Every time there is a problem with water, I'm flooded, as anyone in here can attest. I have a real good history about being flooded so we won't get into that. We will stick to the traffic problem. I have a problem with the La. Once we approve a La zone, the only restriction we have is a conditional use permit and when we had our neighborhood meeting with the developers, they said what we are going to do there is put in a nice small office and it is going to be the home builder that is going to build the homes in there and there will be very few traffic problems and a very small office space. That is fine and it can go through a conditional use permit but if that doesn't happen, can we come back to the city make them either change their conditional use permit or- what are the restrictions on this office building. Borup: If what doesn't happen? If the building is not built you mean. Brian: No, if they build like a two story multiplex theatre or something. What ever they are-more then just a small doctors office. Borup: That is the reason for the conditional use permit. It has to come before a public hearing. Brian: If they don't adhere to the conditional use permit then we come back to City Hall. Borup: No, they can't build it. BrIan: (inaudible) a small office space and it will only bring in- Borup: The design of the building itself will be brought before. Meridian Planning arh... Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 29 Brian: And it will go through a traffic study with Ada County on traffic use. My concern is cars coming and going all day long. Borup: It will be like any other project. ACHD needs to review it then and the conditional use permit will be for specific buildings, specific design. And, limited uses also. That is the only thing that can be built there. They couldn't get a building permit otherwise. Brian: So that would be the time we need to pursue what we don't want in there. Borup: Right. And we can put other conditions-there can be conditions placed on it in addition to. We have done that in the past. We have limited specific uses even though they may have been approved allowed in a zone we've limited to more specific Brian: I am talking about enforcement. Once you put the restrictions on what they can and can't do and they come and tell you that there is going to be a small traffic flow and it ends up being a daycare center, where you have many traffic flows. Borup: That is where the uses can be -that is part of the conditional use. Brain: Okay. Getting back to the R-8, I am sure the developers will argue otherwise they have but being surrounded by R-S and knowing first hand, the R-S subdivisions as history goes, after of course a 3 to 5 years a lot of houses in there become rentals. I am dealing with a renter behind me right now with problems. People come and go and they don't take care of the place and kids and dogs run wild and I have problems with that. Once you start renting them out the neighborhood goes right down the street and things do get taken care of. I have a big berm on my north side that is supposedly being taken care of by the homeowners association. That has gone out the door after the first 3 years that subdivision was in there. They have gone through there and cleaned it up and pruned the trees once in the last 10 years. It looks like a trash-all the bark gone off the berm, the trees are all over grown. You can't walk down the sidewalk without hitting your head. It is a mess and I guess the subdivision there does not care. Borup: I don't think I see anything we can address here. Brian: Well, we are talking about the R-S zoning and that is what R-S zoning turns into is my point. That is my last point, so 11m done. Borup: Thank you Don. Anyone else. Need to hurry if you do. Powell: Wes Powell. I live at 20S9 N. Sapphire Place. Basically, as it is set up right now they would be backed up right against my property. Right now we have an easement where we can't build 30 feet off the property line which if that is the case, then that is what they should have to do, so it gives us that much more if they are going to build R-8 houses-I mean according to his plan as shown right now, I'd have 3 houses, trailers, whatever you want to call them, butted up against my fence. That is Meridian Planning 81. _ Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 30 the disagreement I have is if he is going to come in here and build these small places, or actually I think he should build them as large as the surrounding houses. My concern is right now we have kids that run through the field and stuff. If anything they should take it and build a park and put some good use to it. Traffic problems like everybody else, same complaint is all [ have to say. Borup: Thank you. Anyone else? Mortson: My name is Lane Mortson. I live at 2092 Sapphire Place directly in the center on the north side in the pie shape lot. I have the same concerns about the R-8 that the density is going to show a lot smaller lots and I don't think that the people that live there are going to be long term residents and that they are going to take care of their places very we!1. It is just my opinion. I am also concerned about the water and the pressure and basically the concerns about the other folks who have voiced their opinion also. Borup: Thank you sir. Do we have anyone else or are we done? Morison: My name is Tina Mortson and I live at 2092 Sapphire Place. I know at the time that we had bought our property 8 years ago, we were told about the easement that ran along our property. At that same time they talked about the easement on the other side. So there is a concern. Is that easement going to effect where they are going to build. That is consideration and the water pressure is another consideration and then the kids that will be going to (inaudible). They all ready have over crowding. That was a issue years ago. We have been here twice since we lived at 2092 in regards to people building there. These are all the same concerns that we had at that time that we still have now. I would like to know about that easement also. I am sure that it runs on that property line. Borup: Is that a sewer easement. Is that a main trunkline easement? Mortson: I think it is a irrigation, if I'm not mistaken, that runs-we have to pay irrigation charge and I am sure that it is irrigation ditch that was supposed to be back there. If I'm not mistaken, our easement is like 30 feet from our back fence. There is no way that we can build back there. Borup: It would have to be something addition to a irrigation (inaudible). There may be two, but~- Isn't there a trunk line running through there-a major-No? Freckleton: Not sewer. A few years back, Don would probably remember this better then myself. He was pretty involved in that. ACHD went in a few years ago and put in a new-l guess it was a irrigation run off combination storm drain. He is shaking his head no. Borup: Okay so the statement was there is a 24 inch irrigation easement. That is a 30 foot for 24 inch. Meridian Planning anu Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 31 Freckleton: I don't know what the easement is. State statute requires that all easements of record be shown on a preliminary plat and we don't have a preliminary plat to look at, so I am sure that we'll be addressing that issue. Borup: Which lot were you on -which street. Mortson: 2092 N. Sapphire. We are the center culdesac that butts up right there. Borup: I think at one point there was an easement through those-I am going back a few years-that easement may not be on the lot line. I may be through the property. That will definitely shown up on the plat. Mortson: There is definitely water problems. Thank you. Borup: Commissioner's. Oh, would the applicant like to have a summary? Canning: Thank you Mr. Chairman. All ready lots of issues coming up tonight. We anticipate most of these can probably be better addressed with the preliminary plat and planned unit development process. I think I'd like to speak specifically to the zoning. We do have a piece of property here that is surrounded although I personally feel that your going to be seeing pressures in the near future from the south going to the north from Fairview for more intense commercial type zoning. J think Doris Subdivision will be in transition over the next 10 to 15~20 years. What we were proposing, I believe, is number one, in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Meridian. We do have the commercial zone directly kitty corner to the southeast. We feel a LO zone is most appropriate for a buffer from Locust Grove. Immediately to the east of us, there are some mini storage areas over there also. We feel this is a really good transition. From a traffic aspect, we have had some preliminary talks with ACHD. Of course Locust Grove will be restricted within the next year or two. That should alleviate some of the issues. The traffic engineers so far have not seen a particular issue with what we are proposing here. One minor advantage of the LO zone is that you see you traffic pattern switching. The R-8, the residential has a tendency to -if you have peaks early in the morning and after work hours, like 4 to 5-6 o'clock at night. With the LO zoning you will find the reverse of that. The flow directions are opposite. It actually helps mediate some of the traffic impacts from that residential zone. We feel that is a real plus with that office area there. I don't know how many other issues you want me to address tonight. We feel the zoning is most appropriate. We are basically surrounded by the R-8 and we do feel it is most appropriate for this property. I won't touch any of the other specific issues. I think that is most appropriate at the next hearing, but jf there are specific questions I would be happy to answer them. Borup: Any questions? Seeing none, thank you. Commissioner's, what is your pleasure. Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman I move we close the public hearing. Meridian Planning r i Zoning Commission January 12, 2000 Page 32 Brown: Second. Borup: All in favor? MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Barbeiro: Mr. Chairman, with regards to Mr. Canning's comments about the Doris Subdivision, except for those lots that butt up to Locust Grove, I do not see that subdivision turning commercial. Since we have R-8 to the north, to the south and to the west, it does fit the plan and motive of our Comprehensive Plan and the planning here regardless of whether the south has 1 acre lots or regardless whether the south is county or city. Borup: I would have to agree with that. Brown: Me too. Sarbeiro: With that Mr. Chairman, I would like to move that we recommend approval to City Council the request of annexation and zoning of 5.029 acres from RT to La and R- 8 by Centers Construction. Brown: I second. Borup: All in favor. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES Borup: Commissioner's would this be an appropriate time for a break. We will have a 5 minute break at this point. If the other application move along, it looks like we should get through our agenda. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF 3.68 ACRES FROM R1 TO R.4 FOR PROPOSED PINTAIL POINTE SUBDIVISION BY JEFF MANSHIP-SOUTH SIDE OF CHERRY LANE EAST OF BLACK CAT ROAD: Borup: Steve do we have a staff report. Siddoway: Yes I do. First of all I'd like to ask number 9 on the agenda is the preliminary plat. The difference between this and the other is this annexation and zoning does have preliminary plat with it tonight. Would you like me to restrict my comments just to the annexation and zoning at this point or do you want me to cover the plat as well? Borup: Just cover both. NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the Ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Laws of the State of Idaho, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Meridian will hold a public hearing at the Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, Meridian, Idaho at the hour of 7:00 p.m. on January 11,2000 for the purpose of reviewing and considering the application of Centers Construction, Inc. for the annexation and zoning of 5.029 acres from R~T to LO and R-8 for proposed Centers Subdivision located at the west side of Locust Grove north of Fairview. A more particular description of the above property is on file in the City Clerk's office at Meridian City Hall, 33 East Idaho Street, and is available for inspection during regular business hours. A copy of the application is available upon request. Any and all interested persons shall be heard at said public hearing and the public is welcome and invited to submit testimony. DATED this 20th day of December 1999. PUBLISH December 24,1999 and January 7,2000 - - - sent By: Clty or Merldlan; 100. II. to.. t' I.>, ... <::. I.>, ( , t r ~ tl;> ~ "l <::. ..... ...... .... <::. .,., ....... 1.0 .... '" 1 ~ '" l:t, ... .00 m f' . . ., F i Z ~ r Ii ~ ~ B I ... II> ... _ I~ 'Zit ~ i! f 5~ ii' I if i i P I ~ i i I Si n d. ~~ ;~ : ~ .. =< t!~ ~ m ~~;;,? . 'I' tOl .... ~ ~ r~t tb { :t . fop 'i:rt <::... , \'j ,;.,. "', tt t~ I::l ! ;r ft :(: > t '":-;;; .!-~ e ::t Tr..L..1 ... _ ..-........ ....-........ -...---- -'---..- .... .~.. ...i...."1.... f'.' '~""'I . ~ , . . .. '''' . . . . .-",. ~ .......... ..... P................... . . :....... ~,.:. . , . r.:; ".. ; 11,.'1.-.; : . . . ....;......:......: . . . . . . ................ . . . . . . :,........ ..1'-" . . . ~~'!: ~I:-""; ljIoIj.L.:.II,I: ; . . . . . . ...........;,......: :,._.. :,.. I ~ : ; : .q...............1 ~. . . . . , . . ... . . .!........:.....: ! : : . J' . . . ............' . . . :- , . . .~ --r i; "If . . . .. . -..... -.. .... . . . I . . ;--~. ....:.. ,., : . . . "<"JI . . . . . ',' .. . . . ". . .. , ~ ~,..",. . . . . . . . ..........,....t . . . ',... ., . , . ................ . . . ;-.. n...; . . . .. -........ I... . . . . . ~- " , . ................ . . . :1_.. ~ .. ..~li . __.. ~~c tlli .. .. ~i. ~i ....~ .....m...:... ...-............ . . . .-'. .....p......... . . , ',_.. .:.~.!t;~..~ : ,..~ ~." ; . . -,.......,... . . . -... . . . . .'. . . . . .. . . . . ~ . . . . . , . . .~ , " j . .. . t .. .J . ' j ~ ~ I 2088886854; Jan.~D.oo 10:27AM; ( Page 1/2 JA'" --I n Cr "'U'l I.~OOO ~ J ! n~ I HilI) r ~~ !! H filu 11 II In i f i I ~ u . " tE!:h U f- J i f ~ "J 'J ~. I~~~ I't= ~ ipi~ iP:E~ ! ij;; d if, { I" I ~ ~, it! ~d~j i I ~ h "P . i ~ EI,~. il 11" l q !If i! ~l~ .. ~J m? ITITtrm fWU '.i' .;:;,~~,' i. f't.lt:l' '..t ",:-:~'!i~, .h'''l ~""'I ~::t'''i't::l. ::.::... 777. 1 [ ii . E ;~: f - !~ri; r ~ ~i ~ ~ 'r: l' .. .. .. .. ... ~~~f ' m... :~.. ~ rri f . i[ i l; ..t~r~m ~m~~ ~ ,m HiH' Iln ,t II ,. . . : l t .. .~::.. f :"- i ft 1- t ::C ~! :~~... It . l~ ; "'~~ 1-' .,.1rHi ;;c: ;{ ,r t: ,!..~ !- ~;l.~i'~:.i~: :-.: ~ ~l: }f 'l1~i'i~ i-i{ I' r~ . .;) i' ,~j~!. m ~.:: I r "f ! r~.lt. '.' ~t.: ~: ....,. I~ ti'~. ~.:. ~..: I.. I:: _ ! i~~ i't ~~:h~t l:r j'r :f ~ =1: .' !::~H.. ~F: ~r <~ . '.' 'l "l.tl~ l-:; "t f: : ,.i~;!~ ~_l H; .... ~.; I l':,~: i'rll-,.~t 1::1 ~~l := i i:;; i -.:=$' -.;." r t': 1 . - 1 n t~ ;.~._if ,,'t .:l <.. h .!,I~~< en "i h 1 ~~ 'r: ~iPh,-r :. of ~~ E; :':.1.:"'ts'-!-~ ri ;..~ r. t >:H!:. i' f- " :. :-' : . r~ "::t .. II. E: ii iI ~ -r ~j;[ ~~ ~g ::U=i ~::i :ii r"~ ~ ... 0 ~i=i~ iii ~: ~~l~ ~:i ~i ~it.. ~i' l~~ . "; l . ~-f~ M f' ~~ i~ =~ ;J:. ~t .:~ '1"1< TX CONF I Rf"II" ,ON REPORT ** ( AS OF JAN 06 '~u 09:03 PAGE. 01 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE TIME TO/FROM 01 01/06 09:00 8848938 MODE MIN/SEC PGS CMDn STATUS EC--S 02'24" 004 255 OK ------------~~-----------------------------------~------------------------------~~---------- M~yol. ROBERT D. CORRIE HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433 . Fall (208) 887-4813 City Clerk F".1': (208) 888-4218 LI3GAL DI3PARTMENT (20~) 238.2499 - F~x 288.250 I CilY c.,undl Members CHARLES ROUNTREE GLENN B5NTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITIi BIRD PUBUC WORKS BUILOlNG DEPAltrMBNT Cl08) 887.2211- F~x 887']297 fLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884.5533 - 1-'"", 8S1.l291 MEMORANDUM: January 5, 2000 To: Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council Bruce Freckleton, Assistant to City En..s..ineer ~ Shari Stiles, P&Z Administrator ;2;;;,- From: Re: Request for Annexation and Zoning of 5.029 Acres from R- T to L-O (1.089 Acres) and R-8 (3.940 Acres) by Centers Construction We have reviewed this submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motioD of the Meridian City Council. The property included in this application is located in an area designated as MixedlPlanned Use Development in the Meridian Comprehensive PIan. Property to the north and west is zoned R-8 in the City of Meridian. Doris Subdivision, an Ada COlD'lty subdivision. is located south of the property and is zoned R-B. Immediately east ofthis property across Locust Grove is a large lot zoned R-4 (o'Mled by Don Bryan), and kitty comer to this parcel across Locust Grove arc the Stor~lt storage rental units and the Fred Meyer complex. Although Doris Subdivision was developed as large lots duc to the fact that municipal services were not available at that time, Ada County's R-8 zoning district allows 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre with hookup to municipal services, and the minimum lot size allowed is 6,000 square fuet. The requested zoning of L-O will provide a desirable buffer from Locust Grove for the residential use. The requested R-8 zoning is compatible with the surroW1ding zoning and uses. This property was the subject of a prior annexation application for a project proposed as Grove Run Subdivision in January 1995. Although a rough subdivision layout was submitted with the annexation application, no comments on the plat or planned Wlit development are included in this memorandwn. The appropriateness of annexation and zoning with the requested zoning districts are the only things under consideration at this public hearing. A preliminary plat application and conditional use pennit application for a planned development have been submitted, but have not yet been processed. If the applications are complete, they win be heard at the February meeting ofthe Planning & Zoning Commission. The development narrative submitted with the annexation application includes details on the proposed preliminary plat and PUD. A7.-OO-U02 C<tIlers,A7..d""