The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000 12-05 Meridian City Council Agenda December 5,2000 at 7:30 P.M. City Council Chambers Roll-Call: x X Tammy deWeerd X Cherie McCandless Ron Anderson X Keith Bird X Mayor Robert Corrie CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, Special Pre-Council Meeting: Approve B. Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, City Council Meeting: Approve c. Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Meridian Bowling Lanes at 324 South Meridian Road: Approve D. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: JB's Restaurant at 1565 Meridian Road: Approve E. Beer 2001 Renewal: Pizza Hut Restaurant at 675 South Progress: Approve F. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Fred Meyer's Store at 1850 East Fairview Avenue: Approve G. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Ultra Touch Carwash at 835 East Fairview Avenue: Approve H. Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Whitewater Saloon at 1646 North Meridian Road: Approve I. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 1 at 412 Fairview Avenue: Approve J. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 56 at 66 East State Street: Approve K. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 35 at 522 West Cherry Lane: Approve Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page1of4 All materials presented at public meetings shaJl become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. L. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 24 at 625 North Eagle Road: Approve M. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 11 at 1585 South Meridian Road: Approve N. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Epi's - A Basque Restaurant at 1115 South 1 st Street: Approve o. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Bill-N-Lynn's Place at 229 W. Franklin Road: Approve P. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 164 at 20 East Fairview: Approve Q. Beef and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 180 at 3301 West Cherry Lane: Approve R. Agreement for hookup to City Sewer by Warren and Jeanie Pemberton at 940 South Mustang Drive: Approve - Resolution No. S. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Applebee's at 1460 North Eagle Road: Approve T. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: EI Tenampa at 729 East 1st Street: Approve v. Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Fiesta Guadalajara at 704 East Fairview Avenue: Approve W. Approve bills: Approve REGULAR AGENDA 1. (Items moved from Consent Agenda) 2. Ordinance No. 895: Landscape Ordinance by the City of Meridian: Approve 3. Ordinance No. 2000 Sign Ordinance: Tabled to December 19, Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page 2 of4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of l\4eridian. Anyone desiring accommcxfation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 4. Ordinance No. Steiner Development and the City of Meridian Land Swap at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 and Cherry Lane Golf Course: Tabled to December 19,2000 5. Ordinance No. 896: Planning and Zoning Commission Time and Place of Meeting: Approve 6. Ordinance No. 897: City Council Meeting Schedule: Approve 7. Public Hearing: VAR 00-021 Request for a variance to place a 23'-3" by 10' internally illuminated electric pylon sign in an undeveloped part of the industrial technical park by DBSI Industrial - NWC of Stoddard and Overland Roads: Attorney to prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval 8. FP 00-020 Final Plat approval of 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC - south of Ustick Road and west of Black Cat Road: Tabled to December 19,2000 9. FP 00-021 Final Plat approval of 55 building lots and 7 other lots on 17.76 acres in an Ada County R4 zone for Edinburgh Place Subdivision by Bunderson-Smith, LLP - west of Eagle Road on McMillan (west of Austin Creek): Attorney to prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval 10. Final Plat Time Extension: Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision - northeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Ten Mile Road: Tabled to January 2, 2001 11. Request by DBSI for approval of a private road "South Tech Place": Approve 12. Department Reports: A. City Treasurer - Janice Smith: 1. Treasurer's Report: Presented B. City Engineer - Gary Smith: 1. Request to hook up to City Sewer by Dianna Williamson - 2440 South Locust Grove Road: Approve - Attorney to Prepare Agreement for City Council Approval Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page3of4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 2. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No.1: Approve 3. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No.2: Approve 4. Cooperative Agreement between Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District: Attorney To Review for Workshop January 9, 2001 C. City Clerk - Will Berg: 1. Request by Jeff Manship to discuss Tremont Place Subdivision Development Agreement: Attorney to Prepare Addendum for City Council Approval Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page 4 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommooation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council Agenda December 5,2000 at 7:30 P.M. City Council Chambers Roll-Call: x X Tammy deWeerd X Ron Anderson X X Mayor Robert Corrie Cherie McCandless Keith Bird CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, Special Pre-Council Meeting: Approve B. Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, City Council Meeting: Approve c. Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Meridian Bowling Lanes at 324 South Meridian Road: Approve D. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: JB's Restaurant at 1565 Meridian Road: Approve E. Beer 2001 Renewal: Pizza Hut Restaurant at 675 South Progress: Approve F. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Fred Meyer's Store at 1850 East Fairview Avenue: Approve G. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Ultra Touch Carwash at 835 East Fairview Avenue: Approve H. Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Whitewater Saloon at 1646 North Meridian Road: Approve I. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No.1 at 412 Fairview Avenue: Approve J. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 56 at 66 East State Street: Approve K. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 35 at 522 West Cherry Lane: Approve Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5,2000 Page 1 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. L. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 24 at 625 North Eagle Road: Approve M. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 11 at 1585 South Meridian Road: Approve N. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Epi's - A Basque Restaurant at 1115 South 1 st Street: Approve o. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Bill-N-Lynn's Place at 229 W. Franklin Road: Approve P. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 164 at 20 East Fairview: Approve Q. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 180 at 3301 West Cherry Lane: Approve R. Agreement for hookup to City Sewer by Warren and Jeanie Pemberton at 940 South Mustang Drive: Approve - Resolution No. s. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Applebee's at 1460 North Eagle Road: Approve T. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: EI Tenampa at 729 East 1 st Street: Approve v. Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Fiesta Guadalajara at 704 East Fairview Avenue: Approve w. Approve bills: Approve REGULAR AGENDA 1. (Items moved from Consent Agenda) 2. Ordinance No. 895: Landscape Ordinance by the City of Meridian: Approve 3. Ordinance No. Sign Ordinance: Tabled to December 19, 2000 Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page 2 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. 4. Ordinance No. Steiner Development and the City of Meridian Land Swap at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 and Cherry Lane Golf Course: Tabled to December 19,2000 5. Ordinance No. 896: Planning and Zoning Commission Time and Place of Meeting: Approve 6. Ordinance No. 897: City Council Meeting Schedule: Approve 7. Public Hearing: V AR 00-021 Request for a variance to place a 23' -3" by 10' internally illuminated electric pylon sign in an undeveloped part of the industrial technical park by DBSI Industrial - NWC of Stoddard and Overland Roads: Attorney to prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval 8. FP 00-020 Final Plat approval of 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No.1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC - south of Ustick Road and west of Black Cat Road: Tabled to December 19,2000 9. FP 00-021 Final Plat approval of 55 building lots and 7 other lots on 17.76 acres in an Ada County R4 zone for Edinburgh Place Subdivision by Bunderson-Smith, LLP - west of Eagle Road on McMillan (west of Austin Creek): Attorney to prepare Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law for approval 10. Final Plat Time Extension: Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision - northeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Ten Mile Road: Tabled to January 2, 2001 11. Request by DSSI for approval of a private road "South Tech Place": Approve 12. Department Reports: A. City Treasurer - Janice Smith: 1. Treasurer's Report: Presented B. City Engineer - Gary Smith: 1. Request to hook up to City Sewer by Dianna Williamson - 2440 South Locust Grove Road: Approve - Attorney to Prepare Agreement for City Council Approval Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page 3 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. ( 2. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No.1: Approve 3. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No.2: Approve 4. Cooperative Agreement between Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District: Attorney To Review for Workshop January 9, 2001 C. City Clerk - Will Berg: 1. Request by Jeff Manship to discuss Tremont Place Subdivision Development Agreement: Attorney to Prepare Addendum for City Council Approval Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page 4 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council Agenda December 5, 2000 at 7:30 P.M. City Council Chambers *' Tammy deWeerd ~.. Cherie McCandless Ron Anderson Keith Bird K Mayor Robert orrie JW({17vv i~ III ~~l'/ l>~ cbY~Nf AGENDA _ , fJr~f'~fz;c.;t7\nJf-p L,hd~ lJ.e/ftlAo ,- ;.7a:?J1Jn. d #,/Lr tJ,,~ A. Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, Special Pre-Council Meeting: Clfi,r:T'tJ v~~ Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, City Council Meeting: ~fTrv v.e.....- Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Meridian Bowling Lanes at 324 South Meridian Road: t?V/l','i/ v~e- Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: JB's Restaurant at 1565 Meridian Road: Ctf7Y'O v~ Beer 2001 Renewal: Pizza Hut Restaurant at 675 South Progress: Beer and ~~01 Renewal: Fred Meyer's Store at 1850 East Fairview Avenue: ap fJIOvR-, Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Ultra Touch Carwash at 835 East Fairview Avenue: apfl7'Ov~ Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Whltewater Saloon at 1646 North Meridian Road: apfJl19V~ Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 1 at 412 Fairview Avenue: a!j1rP(/~ Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 56 at 66 East State Street: ap!l'1?v.e,/ Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 35 at 522 West Cherry Lane: ~ '-'H!VV Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 24 at 625 North Eagle Road: tlfpr~ City Council ~ -December 5. 2000 Page 1 of4 All materials presented at public meetings shalf become property cI the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. RolI...Call : B. c. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. ( ( M. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 11 at 1585 South Meridian Road: ar j7nP(('L Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Epi;s - A Basque Restaurant at 1115 South 18t Street: ~p v:.V Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Bill-N-Lynn's Place at 229 W. Franklin Road: tljl j1nlv~ Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 164 at 20 East Fairview: ~rv~ Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 180 at 3301 West Cherry Lane: tbppYl:J (r'L/ Agreement for hookup to City Sewer by Warren and Jeanie Pemberton at 940 South Mustal'!9 Drive: ajPf'Y"?VJl.-- f( eF ~~/ Li Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Applebee's at 1460 North Eagle Road: anf)J~ Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: EI Tenampa at 729 East 1st Street: tlf);rJY'O vJl/ Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Fiesta Guadalajara at 704 East Fairview Avenue: ~~ Approve bills: ahy!Jv~ REGULAR AGENDA (Items moved from Consent Agenda) Ordinance No. B Cf S Landscape Ordinance by the City of Meridian: approve.... Ordinance No. : Sign Ordinance: -fa6&- ~r41 /2 ~{9-PO Ordinance No. : Steiner Development and the City of Meridian Land Swap at The Lakes at Cherry Lane No. 8 and Cherry Lane Golf Course: ft..j.U ~ L (2 -I q-f)O Ordinance No. 816 : Planning and Zoning Commission Time and Place of Meeting: al/FY'? I/Z Ordinance No. fl11 : City Council Meeting Schedule: ~f1Pro v~ Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page 2 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property cI the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings. please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. N. o. P. Q. R. s. T. v. W. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. ( ( 7. Public Hearing: VAR 00-021 Request for a variance to place a 23'-3" by 10' internally illuminated electric pylon sign in an undeveloped part of the industrial technical park by DBSllndustrlal - NWC of Stoddard and Overland Roads: r/ /' ,- if) t:l~_lI) ~ flre fl~ rl r f e(w{. FP 00-020 FinaTPlat approval of 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC - south of Ustick Road and west of Black Cat Road: --k6/~ j-tJ /2--IQ-ClO FP 00-021 Final Plat approval of 55 building lots and 7 other lots on 17.76 acres in an Ada County R4 zone for Edinburgh Place Subdivision by Bunderson-Smith, LLP - west of Eagle Road on McMillan (west of Austin Creek): 6Z# aj?f'I--P~ wi?,/---.r-N!-- c~ Final Plat Time Extension: Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision - northeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Ten Mile Road: -Itt6/-e ~ iliff m ~ /-2-01 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Request by DBSI for approval of a private road "South Tech Place": a;p)?n9 v~ DeparbnentReports: A. City Treasurer - Janice Smith: 1. Treasurer's Report: pre J~tL B. City Engineer - Gary Smith: 1. Request to hook up to City Sewer by Dianna Williamson - 2440 South locust Grove Road: If{ f11rD t" ~ 2. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order NO.1: 4/f/lY()v<- 3. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No. 2: CiJl f'Y1P vu:..- 4. Cooperative Agreement between Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District: diJCt<-J J ~vf IVOVlcfltA?j:) oro-- (- 9-00 c. City Clerk - Will Berg: Meridian City Council Agenda -December 5, 2000 Page 3 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property cI the City of ~. Anyone desiring accommodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearings, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 8884433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. -1. Request by Jeff Manship to discuss Tremont Place Subdivision Development Agreement: reeueJ'+ a/vl.bn~.fo ~11r ftAeridian City Council ,A.genda -December 5, 2000 Paae 4 of 4 All materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City r.I Meridian. Anyone desiring accanmodation for disabilities related to documents and/or hearingst please contact the City Clerk's Office at 888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting. Meridian City Council Meetina December 5. 2000 The regularly scheduled City Council Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order by Mayor Robert D. Corrie at on Tuesday, December 5, 2000. Members Present: Robert Corrie, Keith Bird, Tammy deWeerd, Cherie McCandless, Ron Anderson. Others Present: Bill Nichols, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Dave Bowman, Keith Borup, Will Berg. Corrie: I'll open the regular City Council meeting on December 5, 2000, and ask Mr. Clerk to please call roll. Swearing in of City of Meridian Police Officers Corrie: I want to welcome everyone here this evening, and as you notice I.got a threatening phone call today, so I need all the protection I can get up here. No, seriously these are officers that are being with the Meridian Police Department. We have some of the reserve officers as well the regular officers, and. it is my privilege tonight to swear these gentlemen and young lady into the City of Meridian Police Department. (Ten Meridian Police Officers Sworn) Corrie: Thank you. I will have these signed tomorrow. You are now officially members of the Meridian Police Department. Congratulations. I am going to come down - So once again, congratulations and you are dismissed. Presentation to Linda DeHarro - National Night Out Corrie: Could I have Linda DeHarro come up here please? For everyone here, we had a National Night Out which was a first in the City of Meridian, and it was quite a feat to get everything done and the parade. We had one lady that's in our community that worked especially hard in doing this, and I would like to acknowledge her tonight and we are going to have a plaque here for Linda DeHarro. It says, "Presented in appreciation for your contribution and service to the City of Meridian as a coordinator in Meridian's First National Night Out. Who volunteered time and effort in promotion of this national event for crime, drug, and violence protection program is greatly appreciated by the citizens of the City of Meridian and this community. Presented by Meridian City Council". Linda, thank you so much. Great Job. DeHarro: I just wanted to let everybody know that's here, the City of Meridian and those to which it was our first time that we did get chosen. The only city in the state of Idaho to receive a recognition, a national award for our population Meridian City Council Meeting { December 5, 2000 Page 2 ( from the National Association of Town Watch, and I received today to present to the Mayor, excuse the paint on my hands; I just came from teaching. I also received this award, "National Night Out America's Night Out Against Crime National Award 2000 recognizing outstanding participation in America's Night Out against crime. Presented by National Association of Town Watch to the City of Meridian, Idaho." Congratulations. I just want to let you all know that I can promise you that National Night Out 2001 is going to be even better than National Night Out - the first one we were in and I will work just as hard for the City as I did for this one. Bird: Thank you, Linda. De Weerd: How appropriate to honor you, Linda, the same night we swear in our new officers. DeHarro: Thank you. Corrie: Also, I would like to welcome three boys from Troup No. 123 and Scout Master and also one boy from Troup 138 here tonight. Welcome fellows. I appreciate your participation. Item A. Item B. Item C. Item D. Item E. Item F. Item G. Item H. Item I. Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, Special Pre-Council Meeting Approve minutes of November 21, 2000, City Council Meeting Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Meridian Bowling Lanes at 324 South Meridian Road Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: JB's Restaurant at 1565 Meridian Road Beer 2001 Renewal: Pizza Hut Restaurant at 675 South Progress Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Fred Meyer's Stofe at 1850 East Fairview Avenue Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Ultra Touch Carwash at 835 East Fairview Avenue Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Whitewater Saloon at 1646 North Meridian Road Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No.1 at 412 Fairview Avenue Meridian City Council Meeting December 5,2000 Page 3 (- Item J. Item K. Item L. Item M. Item N. Item O. Item P. Item Q. Item R. Item S. Item T. Item V. Item W. Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 56 at 66 East State Street Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 35 at 522 West Cherry Lane Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 24 at 625 North Eagle Road Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Jackson's Food Stores No. 11 at 1585 South Meridian Road Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Epi's - A Basque Restaurant at 1115 South 1 st Street Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Bill-N-Lynn's Place at 229 W. Franklin Road Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 164 at 20 East Fairview Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Albertson's No. 180 at 3301 West Cherry Lane Agreement for hookup to City Sewer by Warren and Jeanie Pemberton at 940 South Mustang Drive Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: Applebee's at 1460 North Eagle Road Beer and Wine 2001 Renewal: EI Tenampa at 729 East 1st Street Beer and Liquor 2001 Renewal: Fiesta Guadalajara at 704 East Fairview Avenue Approve bills Corrie: Council we have the Consent Agenda in front of you. Any questions, or corrections on that? Anderson: I have none. Bird: I have none. Corrie: Then I'll entertain a motion to approve the Consent Agenda items. Meridian City Council Meeting December 5, 2000 Page 4 Anderson: Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson Anderson: I would make a motion that we approve the Consent Agenda. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Okay, motion is made and seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. Any further discussion? Hearing none all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 2. Ordinance No. 895: Landscape Ordinance by the City of Meridian: Corrie: Regular Agenda Item No.2 is an ordinance for Landscape Ordinance by the City of Meridian. Mr. Clerk what ordinance would that number be? Berg: 895. Corrie: 895. Okay, Mr. Clerk would you read ordinance No. 895 by title-only at this point. Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. Ordinance No. 895: An ordinance of the City of Meridian amending the following sections 11-12-3G1; 11- 12-3L2; 11-12-3N4; to eliminate landscaping and to add 11-13-1 G to eliminate the submission of parking landscaping plan; 11-13-483 to eliminate screening and landscaping of parking areas; 12-4-2E2 to eliminate site triangles; 12-4-7 A to eliminate planning strip buffers between landscape uses; and add 11-13-481, 11- 13-482 and 12-6-7 to add references to the new landscape ordinance; and at 12- 4-3 to allow the pedestrian easement to 15 feet wide; and at 12-4-10 to add and additional paragraph pertaining to micro-paths regulations; and at 12-5-2K to allow the easements to be at least 15 feet; and at 12-6-881 to add landscape language that the buffering shall be as approved by the new Landscape Ordinance; and creating a new Chapter 13 of Title 12 to be known as Landscaping and to provide an effective date. Corrie: You have heard the reading of Ordinance No. 895. Is there anyone from, the audience that would like to have the Ordinance read in it entirety? Okay, Council, I will entertain a motion on the Landscape Ordinance No. 895. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Meridian City Council Meeting December 5, 2000 Page 5 r- ( Bird: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 895 and the attorney to draw up proper papers with the suspension rules. De Weerd: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and second to approve Ordinance No. 895 with suspension rules and the Landscape Ordinance. Is there any further discussion? Hearing none, roll-call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll call: McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye; De Weerd, aye; Bird, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 3. Sign Ordinance: Corrie: Item No. 3 is an ordinance for the Sign Ordinance and that we are not quite ready yet, so I will entertain a motion to table that until the December 19, 2000, meeting. Bird: So moved. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to table the ordinance on the Sign Ordinance until December 19, 2000. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 4. Steiner Development and the City of Meridian Land Swap at the lakes at Cherry Lane No.8 and Cherry Lane Golf Course De Weerd: Mr. Mayor, I would like to excuse myself from Item No.4. Corrie: All right. Item No. 4 is an Ordinance, and Mr. Clerk would that be No. 896? Is that correct? Berg: Yes. Corrie: That would be Ordinance No. 896, Steiner Development and City of Meridian Land Swap of the Lake of Cherry Lane No. 8 and Cherry Lane Golf Course. Mr. Nichols. Meridian City Council Meeting ,: December 5, 2000 Page 6 Nichols: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, some issues have come up since the last the public hearing was held. I don't know if - Mr. Bradbury is here on the behalf of Steiner Development. I think one of the issues that has come up since that public hearing is whether there was ever any agreement to tile all of the Eight Mile Lateral that runs along that golf course property from - it's near where the clubhouse is. The current - the status of the current matter is that there was a tentative agreement reached for which a written agreement was prepared which has not been signed by the City yet, but by prior motion of the Council to put before the Council for passage and approval this land exchange. The issue has come up with regard to whether there had been any prior commitments on part of Steiner Development Corporation to tile, or provide the tile, the pipe, if you will, for the Eight Mile Lateral beyond what they had covenant to provide in the current agreement. Steiner Development has executed the proposed agreement. The City has not yet, although Mr. Bradbury has provided to the Clerk the agreements that bear the Steiner Development signatures. So I don't - in all fairness to Mr. Bradbury, this is a very late development which I talked to him a little bit about yesterday and then in greater detail today and this evening. I don't know if he is prepared to address the issues or whether there is any additional commitments that Steiner Development has agreed to beyond what was in the proposed agreement or not or whether even Mr. Bradbury is prepared to address it. Corrie: Mr. Bradbury, would you like to address that now, or would you rather at a later time? We want to make sure everyone has time to go over this. Bradbury: Mr. Mayor, I can speak for a moment or two; I am not sure that I can resolve the issue tonight. I guess I should start probably by making sure that I understand the issue so that I talk about something that you all are interested in. I gather that the tenant, the golf course tenant, is concerned about the length of lateral that could be piped pursuant to this exchange agreement as presently proposed. And is I guess - and I spoke to Mr. Holloway for a moment just out in the hall, and I guess what they're interested in having done is having the entire length of the Eight Mile Lateral through this area, and I am not even sure I can describe it more precisely than that except to say that I gather that some 500 or 600 feet worth of ditch that they would like to see put into a pipe. The cost of which, of course, would be significantly more than what Steiner Development has committed to in the agreement that has been presented to you and is considerably more than the difference in the values of the two properties which are proposed to be exchanged. I cannot tell you a precise number, but even if it's just the pipe we are talking about, we have got to be talking about close to 30,000 dollars worth of pipe to go 600 feet. Now, I know I have been working on this thing now for 18 months or more and I know that there have been long periods of time where it has sat dormant and there hasn't been any activity and there would be periods of time like know where we have done a lot or tried to do a lot. I do recall of having had a number of conversations and discussion and negotiations with various members of the City staff and representatives from the Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 7 golf course including a meeting over there in the new building where we had about half dozen different people around the table. A lot of different proposals were made and a lot of requests were made, and the negotiations ebbed and flowed. I certainly would not want to argue to you that the people at the golf course had never requested that that amount of work be provided, but I can tell you that, at least to my knowledge, Steiner Development certainly never committed to doing any such thing. My instructions had been to try to figure out the value of the properties were, then equalize it. If it need to be equalized by offering to the City in amount of pipe, which is exactly what I did and is reflected in the proposal that I delivered to the City this last August, originally, and what the Council had for and approved in October. Tonight I cannot make you any kind of a commitment further or in addition or different than what is already before you; what has been proposed to you? I can say that it is more than a little discouraging after all this time and after we thought we'd come to an agreement to discover that perhaps now we're looking at re-negotiating the deal. You need to understand that Steiner Development is, of course, spent a fair amount of money paying me to do my work. They have paid for the appraisals on the property which I think was somewhere around 1 ,000 dollars. They have committed to pay the title insurance cost for both, all the parcels, both sides of the transaction. I think that Steiner Development has done everything that it has been asked to do by the City; it's a little disturbing that we may yet be backtracking on that. With that, I would be pleased to try to answer in questions that you may have. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Steve, I agree with you and we - I should say I just flat missed on the 152 feet. I had always been the understanding that it was going to be taken care of. I also believe that when you come up - when Steiner come in with the value of the lots, I don't think it was quite as - I think their value was right now as the lot sit they are not worth hardly anything. Now when they get this land they jump up probably to 45,000- or 50,000-dollar lots. I think they were allowed at 27,000-dollar in the agreement exchange. Bradbury: You're talking about the exchange parcels? Bird: Yes. Bradbury: I have the appraisal in my file. Bird: They're appraised without this exchange, though. Bradbury: I think they are appraised in place. Bird: But, when you this exchange on them, they are not a real good lot without this exchange, and speaking for myself we made an agreement. Knowingly reading your agreement, I would hope that - like I've said I've always understood that whole thing was going to be it, but I just missed on the 152 feet. I certainly Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 8 don't want to see you have to go back and do a lot more work. I would hope that Steiner would - when you take a lot that's worth x-amount of dollars and buy at exchange, probably double the value of the lot that should be tight. Bradbury: I couldn't disagree with you. There is no question, but the value added is to - certainly different as a result. Bird: I just want you to understand that it was just our - we just missed on the 152 feet. I had always been told it was being tiled from here to here. I didn't know how many feet it was. That was our fault. Corrie: Steve, did you get a copy of this? You may not have. Bird: It's from Gary. Smith: Mr. Mayor, I do not believe that he has received that. Bradbury: Is there something in there that maybe I can respond to? Bird: Well, I think that is something that - Corrie: I'll give you my copy.. Well I think you should have a copy of that so you know what we are talking about so that you can take time to look at that, because there are some questions that did come up that Gary had that you were not at that point privy to. (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Bradbury: Actually I can respond to a certain extent. Because I did in fact have a copy of the earlier memorandum that Bill Gigray put together and I remember seeing the same thing. I remember seeing that 820 feet and, as a matter of fact, after Mr. Nichols and I spoke yesterday, I went back in my file and said, well, okay, let's see what I can find in my notes, and I can remember seeing that and the reason that it caught my attention is because when I received this memo I immediately wrote a letter to Mr. Campbell and said here's the memo and look they're talking about piping 820 feet. Is that what you had in mind? Of course, I didn't have a letter back but I had a telephone conversation back saying no, that's not what we had in mind, and as I recollect the conversations it was I know that's what Mr. Lovan would like to see, but that's not what Steiner had - Steiner Development had envisioned. I say Steiner; Doug Campbell. Yes, I do remember seeing that, and, unfortunately, it gets into black and white like this and all the sudden seems to take on some more importance than what at least we thought it was. I guess, that's more to my point of, yes, there were discussions in negotiations going back and forth, but I am certainly not aware of a commitment to pipe 825 feet of that ditch. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 9 Anderson: Was there any written communication on any of that negotiations going back and forth; I mean this is the only thing that I've seen. Bradbury: Yes, and looking through my file I would hope that I would find something as well, there isn't. There are my notes of a meeting which took place, I am going to say - well I can't remember exactly -- but it was about this time where I had all kinds of numbers written down about different distances that we might tile or potential values of the property and we were guessing at the time because we did not know how those properties would be appraised. So, the bottom line was always to try to equalize the values in some fashion. But, in terms of any written communications between myself and the City, there hadn't been. Anderson: Comments on my part, Mr. Mayor. Based off this letter and then what was put in this last particular agreement it almost appears because of the length of time that's gone on and the change of attorneys representing the City and stuff, yes, we should have been more cautious and should have read the numbers but I almost feel like we've been dealt kind of a slighted hand here, and I guess I just put that away in the memory bank for future, I guess. Bradbury: I sure hate for you have to feel that feel way. I certainly did not intend to try to trick the City in any regard. I sure hope that you are not feeling that way about -- well you obviously are because you just said it, and I am sorry you do because I certainly didn't intend for that to happen. Corrie: Are there any other comments? Bird: Yes, I would like - if you've got those real quick I don't remember I don't have what the value of the lots were appraised at. I've got it, Steve. Thank you. Bradbury: I think I gave you a summary sheet when I was here before. Bird: Yes, you did. See they're valuing those lots at $27,000 per acre. Bradbury: And I expect that's an unimproved value that's being placed on there. Bird: And that's what we are - the thing I am looking at, Steve, is the fact that I don't feel that this - I think this is what you are looking at existing now and it doesn't bring in the true value of what those lots are going to sell for when this land swap is go. Like it is stated in our memo from Gary, that the one lot isn't a lot, basically. Lot 57, Block 1, and Lot 1, and between that, Lot 26 without this land trade isn't a buildable lot. How much - I don't know how you value that or what the pipe-schedule value was based off of that. I would like to see Doug and Mr. Steiner come forward and maybe do that. I realized I for one we made this agreement. I'm going to live with it. That's our fault for not realizing, not reading 152 feet and realizing that, and you guys went through enough work, but I would Meridian City Council Meeting f December 5,2000 Page 10 hope they would come back and say, you know, that Lot 26 is all the sudden not buildable, but all the sudden it a 45,000- or 50,OOO-dollar lot. Bradbury: There no question but that once you go from an unimproved value which the appraisals are based upon to a subdivision-lot value, obviously, the value is going to go up dramatically. Of course, to a large extent it's as a result of the improvements that are made by the developer to make it a buildable lot. And of course we all know, developers are in it to profit. Bird: Well if they're not they wouldn't be in business, would be? Bradbury: That's right. Corrie: Of course, in the same token the City has to look out for the City. Bradbury: Of course. Corrie: I agree with Mr. Bird I would like to have Doug to give us a run down on what his thoughts are. We could have it at the next meeting if you want to do that, then ask him questions or see what he wants to do. I think the Council will probably be a little more at ease once we get to talk to him and in the position in which you are in, you cannot answer those questions. Bradbury: You bet. Corrie: So if the Council agrees, we can table that until the next meeting and then we can also consult with the attorney as well. Mr. Nichols to you have anything to add? Nichols: Mayor, members of the Council, I need to apologize to Mr. Bradbury for not giving a copy of Gary Smith's memo and I do that publicly. Corrie: I also apologize too. Bradbury: That's perfectly fine. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I've got one question. Has Steiner and them signed the agreement. Bradbury: Yes, they have. The signed agreements were delivered to Mr. Berg yesterday, I believe. Corrie: Okay, we can either do this tonight or we can wait until the 19th. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 11 ( Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: Let me put out a thought, and this is strictly my feelings. They negotiated in true faith, and we did too, and we realize now the 152 feet wasn't right, but we, as a Council, told these people (inaudible) this ordinance and they have signed it. This thing's went on 18 months, 2 years. I would hope that if we would approve this an sign it that Steiner and Doug would come back and say without having to be done in a deal, I think that we're not showing very good faith in agreements if we are to change it at this point because we did have public hearings, we had a Mayor and four Council people here that read this -- and boy I'll be the first to stand up and take blame for missing the 152 feet. That's too much to just being told they're going to tile the whole thing. Instead of reading every word. So I for one am not for changing the agreement if we made agreement, if the other Council will agree with that. Anderson: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I agree with Councilman Bird, I am a man of my word, and that is what we negotiated and I am willing to live with that agreement and learn from our mistakes on that. I think that looking at this in hindsight, everyone says that yes we should have been a little more cautious, and we should have looked at that, and I think that the proposal that the Mayor made is workable. I still have every intention to sign this agreement if that's what it comes to. I just feel like in this particular case that if Mr. Campbell wanted to come back and make some type of comments or anything else as far as what his feelings are, I would like to hear those before we do approve the agreement and that would mean tabling it for tonight, but I am like you Keith I have no problems if push came to shove this is the agreement that was hammered out, and I can live with that. Bird: I agree with exactly what you said Ron. I agree with the Mayor. I'd like to table - I just wanted put it out that hey this is the agreement. If they don't feel like adding to it we're going to live with because this is what we passed. I'm like you, Ron. If we passed it, then we've got to agree to it. I agree with you, I didn't mean not to table it. I just wanted to say that hey this was the agreement - sure I would like to have Mr. Campbell come in and talk to us if he would like to, but this is the agreement. They have signed it, we agreed upon it, they don't want to change it, and then we live with it. That's my personal feeling. It must be yours, I hope its Cherie's. Cherie can state it for herself. Meridian City Council Meeting December 5, 2000 Page 12 i ( Corrie: Let the record show she is shaking her head yes. Okay, with that being said, Steve, I'll ask for to table this to the 19th of December when we can hear comments from Mr. Campbell. Bird: It will stay Ordinance - Corrie: Do you want to change it at point? It won't be an ordinance at this point. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we table Ordinance - Corrie: Just table the Item. Bird: -- the Land Swap Proposal with Steiner Development and the City of Meridian until December 19, 2000, so that Mr. Campbell can respond. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to table Item 4, the Land Swap at Cherry Lakes No.8 and Cherry Lane Golf Course. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES, ONE ABSTAINED Item 5. Ordinance No. 896: Planning and Zoning Commission Time and Place of Meeting Corrie: Item No. 5 will be Ordinance 896 - Planning and Zoning Commission Time and Place of Meeting. Where's Tammy at? (Inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Corrie: Okay, Mr. Clerk, if you will read the Ordinance No. 896 by title-only, please. Berg: Thank Mr. Mayor. Member of the Council, Ordinance No. 896: An Ordinance by the City of Meridian amending Title 2, Chapter 4, Section 1 of the Meridian City Code Planning and Zoning Meetings Time and Place of regular meetings. The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be held on the first and third Thursday of each month, and in the event of Planning and Zoning Meeting fall on a holiday, the meeting shall not be held on that Thursday, but shall be held on the following Thursday; and providing an effective date. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 13 Corrie: Okay, you have heard the reading of the Ordinance 896 by title-only. Is there anyone from audience that would like to have read in its entirety? What this is primarily is Planning and Zoning is going to have two regular meetings a month now on Thursdays. The first and third Thursdays to take up all the things their meetings - once a month we found was not enough. Hearing none, Council I will entertain a motion on Ordinance No. 896. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I would make a motion that we approved Ordinance No. 896 on Planning and Zoning Commission Time and Place of Meeting with suspension of ru I es. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve Ordinance No. 896 Planning and Zoning Commission Time and Place of Meeting with suspension of rules. Any further discussion? None. Mr. Clerk roll-call, please. Roll-Call: Bird, aye; de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 6. Ordinance No. 897: City Council Meeting Schedule Corrie: Item No. 6 will be Ordinance No. 897 as a City Council Meeting Schedule. Mr. Clerk if you would read that by title only at this point. Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Members of the Council, Ordinance No. 897: An Ordinance of the City of Meridian amending Title 1, Chapter 7, Section 5a of the Meridian City Code, Council meetings, time and place of Pre-Council and regular meetings; and providing time and place of Council meetings shall be at 6:30 p.m. on the night of any regular City Council meeting; the regular meetings shall be held on the first, third and forth Tuesdays; and the forth Tuesday shall contain no hearings or action on land-use applications; and the second Tuesday shall be a City Council workshop of each month; in the event a City Council meeting falls on a holiday or Tuesday in which a City or General Election is held, the meeting shall not be held on that Tuesday, but shall be held on the following Wednesday; and provide an effective date. Corrie: Thank you. Would anyone from the audience like to have Ordinance No. 897 read in its entirety? Hearing none, Council any motion? Meridian City Council Meeting December 5, 2000 Page 14 ( De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 897, City Council Meeting Schedule with suspension of rules. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion is made and seconded that we approve Ordinance No. 897 City Council Meeting Schedule with suspension of rules. Any further discussion? Hearing none. Mr. Clerk will you call roll, please. Roll-Call: Bird, aye; de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Then that will be starting our January meetings then? Berg: Yes, Mr. Mayor. Starting January 1 st which will be the new year. January 2nd will start our Tuesday affairs. Corrie: So we will have our affairs on every Tuesday of the month. Anderson: Well we can go to the whole next year's calendar and mark out Tuesday - black Tuesday. De Weerd: Except for the 5th. (inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Berg: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Yes, Mr. Berg. Berg: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council, speaking of the 5th Tuesday of the month, it has been a request from the Planning and Zoning Commission to meet that 5th Tuesday for our joint meeting, just workshop. So that would take care of your Tuesday meetings, but that is something they have requested for quite sometime. Bird: How many months does that affect? Three? Four? Corrie: I do not know how many that would affect, but I do think it's an excellent idea. We need to keep closer tabs on one another so we are at least working on the same football field. Four. All right, thank you. Meridian City Council Meeting December 5, 2000 Page 15 Item 7. Public Hearing: VAR 00-021 Request for a variance to place a 23'-3" by 10' internally illuminated electric pylon sign in an undeveloped part of the industrial technical park by DBSI Industrial - NWC of Stoddard and Overland Roads: Corrie: Item No. 7 is a public hearing V AR 00-021; request for a variance to place a 23' -3" by 10' internally illuminated electric pylon sign in an undeveloped part of the industrial technical park by DBSI Industrial, northwest of Stoddard and Overland Roads. At this time I will open the public hearing and will have staff comments first, please. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I am not sure they have a representative here tonight, but they have requested a pylon sign out on the freeway for Western Electronics and actually for the future technical park that they plan to develop out in the property they own here. The property is owned -- the parcel actually where Western Electronics is, is owned by DBSI where they're proposing to put the freeway sign is still some sort of partnership with DBSI, but it is Meridian Freeway Associates. They have submitted a site plan, this is not in any way intended to be an approval of their site plan as they have shown it, but it is just a depiction of what they might be proposing in the future when they develop the rest of the property. The pylon sign would be located out - this would be the freeway, and since it is off-premise. That is the reason they have requested it. The sign they proposed will be in accordance with our new Sign Ordinance, and when they come in with the remainder of the development, it can be included in part of the sign program for the entire acreage there. Corrie: Thank you, Shari. Someone from the DBSI? They're not here tonight? Okay. This is a public hearing I invite the public to testify. Is there anyone from the public who would like to testify in this request for variance? Okay. Council, do you have any questions from staff? De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: Before when we've looked at approving variances, we've also looked at how they are in their own development and looking at their CEPs and if they're in compliance. Are they in compliance? Has the right-of-way issue been taken care of with ACHD? Stiles: The right-of-way for Overland Road, they were willing to dedicate that; however, Ada County Highway District was not willing to pay them what their appraised value was. They have told me all the improvements have been made to allow for a five-lane roadway at Overland. They have the appropriate landscape setback from the future right-of-way, but they are just not willing to ( Meridian City Council Meeting { December 5, 2000 Page 16 ( dedicate it to ACHD at this time, if they are not willing to pay what they say the value is. It's not going to go down in price though. De Weerd: Was that part of their condition? Stiles: We put it on the Certificate of Zoning Compliance that they needed to dedicate that. Usually we ask them to dedicate it and provide us recorded copy of the Warranty Deed prior to even processing their building permit. But ACHD assured us that they were in the process of getting that done and that is was going to take about thirty days. So in the interest of trying to help this Western Electronics and help them meet their schedule, we went ahead and processed the building permit, and it was only after that that we learned Ada County Highway District was not willing to pay them for their right-af-way. Nichols: Mayor, Shari, was this a Conditional Use Permit or was this a permitted use in that zone? Stiles: It was a permitted use in that zone. Nichols: So it wasn't a Conditional Use Permit were additional exactions could be required. Stiles: No. Corrie: Any further questions? Bird: I have none, Mayor. Corrie: Okay, then I entertain a motion then that we close the public hearing. *** End of Side 1 *** Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we close the public hearing VAR 00-021 DBSllndustrial on the 10-foot electric pylon sign. Corrie: Do I hear a second? McCandless: Second. Corrie: Okay, motion made and second to close the public hearing on Item No. 7. Any further discussion? All those in favor say aye. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 51 2000 Page 17 ( MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Corrie: Any further discussion? I entertain a motion on the variance No. 00-021. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we approve the request for variance to place a 23'-3" x 10' internally illuminated electric pylon sign in the underdeveloped part of the industrial technical park by DBSI Industrial, northwest Stoddard and Overland Roads and for the attorney to draw up the proper papers. De W eerd: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to approve and request for variance No. 021 and the attorney to draw up the proper forms. Any further discussion? Roll-call vote, Mr. Berg. Roll-Call: Bird, aye; de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 8. FP 00-020 Final Plat approval of 47 building lots and 3 other lots on 14.93 acres in an R-4 zone for Autumn Faire Subdivision No. 1 by Gem Star Properties, LLC - South of Ustick Road and West of Black Cat Road: Corrie: Item No.8, they've asked to table that to the 19th of December for the final plat approval. Any further discussions? If not, I'll entertain a motion to that effect. Anderson: Mr. Mayor, I'd made a motion that we table Item No.8 the Final Plat Approval for Autumn Fairs Subdivision No.1 until December 19, 2000. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and second to table Item No. 8 the Final Plat 020 until December 19, 2000. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 9. FP 00-021 Final Plat approval of 55 building lots and 7 other lots on 17.76 acres in an Ada County R4 zone for Edinburgh Place Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 ' Page 18 Subdivision by Bunderson-Smith, LLP - west of Eagle Road on McMillan (west of Austin Creek) Corrie: Item No. 9 is Final Plat approval of 55 building lots and 7 other lots on 17.76 acres in an Ada County R4 zone for Edinburgh Place Subdivision by Bunderson-Smith, LLP - west of Eagle Road on McMillan (west of Austin Creek). Staff comments. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, you have our comments dated December 1, 2000. I have talked to the applicant's representative, and they are in agreement with the comments. There is a little misunderstanding between us, and I'm not sure how to answer it. On one of the notes on Page 3, Item 13, the first note there, it's kind of conflicting with some of the other notes, and we would just ask that that be coordinated with the Public Works Department. This is - for those of you who may need a refresher this would be the Vienna Wood Subdivision which was done in Ada County by Skyline Corporation. Edinburgh has initially come in with these 40 acres next to Austin Creek. This is our area of impact separating Boise and Meridian. They did come back in with 55 lots. They have expanded the tot lot, and they have also, on their own accord, come in with some additional landscaping as part of the collector into the subdivision. We would like to thank the applicant and his engineer for the thoroughness of their application and not trying to maximize the number of lots that they could cram into this area. It looks like they've got some nicely sized lots in there, and we really appreciate Mr. Smith's attention to detail. We would recommend approval with staff conditions. Corrie: Thank you. Mr. Bunderson, Item No.3 - 13. I'm sorry. I didn't hear you. (inaudible) Okay, Page 3, Item 13. Do we have any - Thank you, Senator. Bunderson: Mr. Mayor and Council, it's just an internal conflict between two requirements in there and we can reconcile the staff. Corrie: Just wanted to get in on record. Council have any question of staff? Bill? Nichols: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, I would just request since we draw up some additional paper work that whatever is worked out is a supplemental staff report which we will then attach with this one so that we've got it all squared up. So we just need to have whatever this reconciliation of the conflicting provisions is done; so that we can have it attached as an additional document. Corrie: Any other questions, discussion? I will entertain a motion then on a final plat approval of No. 00-021. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I would move that we approve the final plat approval for 55 building lots and 7 other lots on 17.76 acres in an Ada County R4 zone for Edinburgh Place by Bunderson-Smith, LLP, west of Eagle Road on McMillan Meridian City Council Meeting (- December 5, 2000 ' Page 19 ( west of Austin Creek with staff comments and for the attorney to draw up the proper papers. De W eerd: Second. Corrie: Okay, motion has been made and second to approve the final plat of 00- 021 with the supplemental staff report attached and the attorney to draw up the proper forms. Any further discussion? Hearing none. Roll-call vote Mr. Berg. Roll-Call: Bird, aye; de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 10. Final Plat Time Extension: Request by Glenn Johnson Homes for a time extension for the signing and recording of final plat for Hartford Subdivision - northeast corner of East Ustick Road and North Ten Mile Road: Corrie: Item No. 10 the Final Plat Time Extension. This was supposed to a public hearing on a variance, so we asked that be tabled to January 2, 2001. With that objection, the Council will obtain a motion in that affect. Bird: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we table Item No. 10 Final Plat Time Extension and change it to a public hearing until January 2, 2001. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Okay, motion made and second to stand Item No. 10 to a public hearing on a variance till January 2, 2001. Any further discussion? Hearing none. All those in favor of the vote say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 11. Request by DBSI for approval of a private road "South Tech Place": Corrie: Item No. 11 is a request by DBSI for approval of a private road "South Tech Place." This, I believe, you're on Shari on this one. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I apologize for the information not getting into your packets. We've kind of had an eleventh-hour request from Western Electronics that they be allowed to have a private road because they want their address to be off of that private road, and in order to get approved for a private Meridian City Council Meeting \ December 5, 2000 ' Page 20 ( road that needs to go to the City Council for approval. They have already built this roadway; they've built it to Ada County Highway District standards and had Strata Engineering to do the testing for them. They could have had their address be on Overland Road, but they would prefer to take their address off this private road that will be known as South Tech Place. The reason for the short time- frame is because they are trying to move in during the Christmas vacation, and they would like to get their letterhead and their business cards and such ordered and on-line when they are moving. So, I would recommend that they approved to have a private road known as South Tech Place for the Western Electronics DBSI site. Corrie: Any questions of Shari? Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I'd like Mr. Nichols, if he wouldn't mind, to give us some pit-falls that can happen on private roads. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Bird, and members of the Council, I guess what I'm looking at maybe a question for Shari would be a way to get at that. We've had some problems with private roads as far as kind of creating a de-facto subdivision. How does this one differ from those like we were addressing last week with another developer to try to avoid the private road creating an additional parcel and that sort of thing; how does this one differ from that situation? Stiles: In this case, the site where Western Electronics is currently is already a lot-af-record. They are not creating a new lot by basically sub-dividing it with this road. The road I am not sure if it goes all the way back to the freeway at the point, but they are aware that they do not have additional building permits available to the site, and that they will need to come in either through a sub- division process or conditional use process in order to get future building permits. Nichols: So it's not like some of the situations we've seen before where the developer goes in and tries to create a private road and - Stiles: Create lots. See, for example, if they'd come in and said they have this lot here, and they want to create a private road right through the middle of it, which in essence which just give them two lots, this is a little different situation in that it's just bordering a side of an existing parcel and not bisecting a parcel into two or more lots. Meridian City Council Meeting (' December 5, 2000 ' Page 21 ( Nichols: I guess I am contused. I'm looking at the boundary there, is that one lot of record or is the only lot ot record where the existing Western Electronics building is? Stiles: You kind of have to ignore all these other building that they've shown on here; none of that is approved. The only thing that they've built - I think they've only built a portion of this roadway, and this would be the private lane. I don't believe they're proposing it to go all the way here until they come back in with a subdivision and plat it and get it recorded to make legal lots. The difference in the one that we were looking at before was actually going right down the middle of an existing lot-af-record, and it wasn't a private lane they were proposing. They were actually dedicating it to Ada County Highway District as a public road. Nichols: So if I understand you correctly, if they go to build the next building to the north, they would have to come in and sub-divide that property to put in that other building; that next building up - the rectangular one. Stiles: They have some kind of strange parcels that goes up about like this - but I don't believe that's a legal lot, and they understand that they don't have any more legal lots to build on out there and they will have to come back in through some entitlement process to get building permits for those other lots. This whole thing here would be another lot. All of this is just one lot. They've done something for some reason to break off a lot here, but I don't believe that one was done legally. So they don't have any legal lots remaining. Nichols: I guess what I am asking, Shari, in other words, if they come back in tomorrow and say, we want to put a 40,OOO-square foot warehouse north of the one that we just built or that just built, they're not going to get that building permit because they not have a lot-at-record to put it on. Stiles: Right. They don't have a legallot-of-record. Corrie: Is legal counsel okay with that? Nichols: Yes, Mayor and members of the Council. I just know that Shari's been a death on private roads, and so I wanted to make sure that I understood why this one was okay. Stiles: I am not death on private roads as long as they are approved; I am death on the Highway District accepting dedications of public roads that's actually a conveyance of property. Nichols: I sit corrected. Meridian City Council Meeting December 5, 2000 Page 22 Corrie: Also let the record show that the Mayor had a conversation with Shari this morning, and I'd be happy to discuss with the Council afterwards about adding things on that you haven't gotten by Friday, but this - Bird: And I appreciate that Mayor, and that's something that we had discussed, and I appreciate that. Corrie: And it won't happen again, right, Shari? Stiles: Right. Bird: Thank you. Corrie: All right Council, you have heard the request by Planning and Zoning Director. How do you want to proceed? Bird: Mr. Mayor, I've got one question though. I guess I'm not as clear as the legal counsel. I can't figure out what's the difference between this private road and the private road out behind RC Wiley's. Stiles: That's behind RC Wiley's? Bird: Or one that's going off that or whatever the one out there to the east. What is the difference? Stiles: They were proposing the private road. They came in and asked for a private road, and then they were turning around and dedicating it to the Highway District. Bird: Okay, you answered my question. Okay. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: Just a comment before we make a motion to vote on this, but I, too, would like to voice my concern about private roads. I think they can work in some industrial settings like this commercial settings, but I am opposed to them especially when we get into residential areas because we have some real maintenance headaches and things like that and trying to keep them up. So, I'll throw in my two cents' worth on that. (inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Corrie: Any other discussion? Then I'll entertain a motion on the request. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 ' Page 23 Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we approve the request by DBSI for approval on the private road known as South Tech Place off of Overland Road with staff comments and attorney to draw up the proper papers. De W eerd: Second. Corrie: Okay, motion made and seconded to approve the request by DBSI of the private road, South Tech Place, and the attorney to draw up the proper papers. Any further discussion? Mr. Berg, roll-call vote, please. Roll-Call: Bird, aye; de Weerd, aye; McCandless, aye; Anderson, aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 12. Department Reports: B. City Engineer - Gary Smith: 1. Request to hook up to City Sewer by Dianna Williamson - 2440 South Locust Grove Road: Corrie: Department Reports, first is Gary Smith. Gary. Smith: First item is a request for Dianna Williamson at 2440 South Locust Grove Road for connect to sewer. She has a failing septic tank. I believe that Shari has had some conversations with Ada County concerning the use of this property, so I will let her address you on this issue. Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I did talk to Ada County. They had no record of anything happening out here as far as the apartments were concerned, but I did get with Dianna Williamson, and she was able to give a little more history of what has happened with that site. Apparently, building permits were not needed out in the County when they converted the old school house into apartments. They did need, apparently, electrical and plumbing permits but actually building permits were not procured for the site to change it into apartments. I have talked with Dianna Williamson and told her that due to the fact out Comprehensive Plan shows that as single-family residential, her request for annexation would need to comply with our single-family zone, and she would need to request and R4, at most an R8, and that there would be no expansion of the non-conforming use permitted. She is willing to get annexed to the City and seemed to understand about the agreement. We did fax an agreement to her today, an example agreement, of the annexation agreement in order to hook up to City services. Meridian City Council Meeting I December 5, 2000 Page 24 Upon her agreement to annex into the City, the City could agree to hook her up just like every other request we've had. Corrie: So you two are recommending the annexation. Smith: Yes, sir. That would be the Public Works recommendation upon their agreement to annex we would agree to - or we would recommend to you to approve their connection to the City sewer. . Corrie: As a four-plex Smith: Yes. Anderson: In R-8 then, right. R-8? Stiles: It wouldn't actually comply with R-4 or R-8. Those are single-family residential zones. It should have to go clear up to a R-15 or R-40 to actually be approved for apartments, but she understands that there will be no expansion. She can continue the use, but just can't expand on it. Bird: Grandfathered in? Stiles: Yes. Bird: As long as there is no expansion? Stiles: Right. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve the request for hook-up to City sewer by Dianna Williamson at 2440 South Locust Grove Road upon annexation to the City and fees as applicable. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Okay, motion made and seconded to approve the request to hook up to City sewer by Dianna Williamson be approved with the conditions set forth in motion. Any further discussion? All those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 2. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No. 1 Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 ' Page 25 ( Smith: Thank you, Mayor and Council. Second item I have is Change Order No. 1 for the WasteWater Treatment Plant Trunk Sewer Extension Headwork Project. This is a Change Order to the existing contract with JC Constructors who is doing the work. The attached - there is a memo that is attached to the packet for Change Order No.1 to JUS Engineers; consists of four items that are part of this Change Order, and if you like I can go through each of these Items, but they are all approved as far as the Public Works Department is concerned, and we would recommend City Council approval of the Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $5, 119.43. If you have any questions I would be happy to answer them. Bird: I have none, Mayor. Corrie: Are there any other question? If there are none. Entertain motion on request. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we approve the Change Order Request No. 1 by JC Constructors for four separate items. The change order amount of $5,119.43 for the Trunk Sewer Extension. McCandless: Second. Corrie: Motion has been made and seconded to approve the request the Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $5, 119.43. Is there any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 3. WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No.2 Smith: Second item is Change Order No.2 on this same project. This change order is a sizable change order, and it is for the construction of a septic receiving station that would be added to the existing contract "to JC Constructors who is doing the headworks project. There is a detailed construction estimate that is attached to your packet prepared by JUS Engineers which was done to substantiate the bid price from JC Constructors of $32,000. J-U-B's independent analysis of the cost is $28,846, so there's a little over $3,000 difference between the two, which we felt was acceptable. This construction of the septic receiving station was not done at the time the headworks project was being bid because of the time constraints we were under. So, it's being submitted to you as a change order as part of JC Constructors project because is need to be relocated due to the head works construction. You're probably not familiar with the location of it, Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 26 it's just to the north and a little bit east of the headworks as it exist right now - or did exist as I should say. So Public Works Department would recommend your approval of the Change Order No.2 and not to exceed amount of $32,000. Corrie: Questions? Bird: I have none. Corrie: We'll entertain a motion on the request. Bird: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Bird. Bird: I move that we approve Change Order No.2 with JC Constructors for the Trunk Sewer Extension for not to exceed the amount of $32,000. Anderson: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded to approve the request for Change Order No.2 not to exceed the amount of $32,000. Any further discussion? Hearing none, all those in favor of the motion say aye. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Item 4. Cooperative Agreement between Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District Smith: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council. Last item I have is the Cooperative Agreement that was given to me Friday between - for the Locust Grove Roadway Overpass Project. This Cooperative Agreement is between Idaho Transportation Department, City of Meridian and Ada County Highway District. It's a relatively short agreement that contains a lot of money in it. Hopefully, you've all had a chance to read this. If you have any questions, I'll try to answer them although this was prepared by lOT. I guess the one that on Page 2, Section 2 outlines what the City's responsibilities are or at least what they are proposed to be. Paragraph Item No. 1 is the financial obligations; Item No. 2 is the Indemnification Clause which is contained in all three portions of this agreement. Bird: Mr. Mayor Corrie: Mr. Bird. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 27 Bird: That wording is not right on that 1.8 million dollars. We said we would pay up to 1.8. In other words it they got that right-at-way tor 1.2, we're not going to pay 1.8. The agreement was up to 1.8, not 1.8 period, as I understand it, as I remember it. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: I have missed the last several meetings you guys have had with Ada County Highway District, so I guess I haven't been real privy to some ot these conversations that have gone on, and I guess I would like to discuss this a little bit at Council Workshop, but I would to discuss where we plan on getting the tunds to do this tram and some at those things betore we enter into this agreement. Corrie: Gary, was the right-at-way of purchase going to be 1.2 million? Is that what they said? Smith: I don't believe I have ever heard a figure, Mr. Mayor. I just recall Jay Switzer from ACHD stating that he thought all the right-at-way could be purchased tor 1.8 million that that would be an adequate amount. I don't recall anything definitive about that amount, though. Bird: No, Mayor that was me who throw that out. I just said was what we had stated over there, and Councilman Anderson was there that day that's been almost a year ago when this came up, was we would pay up to 1.8 million to help purchase right-at-way. We didn't say we would pay 1.8 million because we stated right there, that you know if it was under that, we weren't going to pay it, and it we could get any donated that was going to come off ours. De Weerd: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mrs. de Weerd. De Weerd: I know this was also brought in our workshop last week was who will be managing this and are we actively talking to the residents in seeking that right-of-way, and I agree with Councilman Anderson. I have no idea how we are going to pay tor this. Right now with our mill levy decreasing every year and our services are behind, how on earth are we coming to come up with 1.8 million dollars? Unless we are out there trying to get the right-at-way donated, and if we are then we really need to be kicking into gear and talking to these people. Corrie: Gary, the right-at-way was going to be done by ACHD. They are the expertise in this. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 51 2000 ' Page 28 Smith: That's correct. Corrie: Not us. Smith: That's correct. They were going to negotiate for the purchase of the right-of-way. There was some conversation at one of the meetings that we had with the Highway District concerning this project about the City of Meridian contacting property owners for donation of right-of-way, that's true, but the Highway District is to be the negotiator in purchasing of right-of-way. De Weerd: Then we better be getting our kneepads on and start contacting the residents and see if we can get some donations. Anderson: When did they want this? Smith: They wanted it back as soon as possible they said. (inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Nichols: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Who is this? Bill? Nichols: Yes. Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, if I can interject .here, too. I think another issue is particularly if the City's commitment is up to 1.8 million dollars, I would prefer to see the language worded, such that, the City would segregate the 1.8 million dollars and provide those funds when requested on a draw basis from ACHD for the purchase of right-of-way so that the City maintains the interest income on those funds. The act of segregation of those funds into a separate account would show ACHD that the funds were there that they were available for use on right-at-way so that when they struck a deal with the land owner they could submit their request to the City Treasure and then could have the funds drawn out of those and the City Treasurer could also coordinate with the right-at-way agent with regard to anticipated cash flow requirements, but that way the City gets the interest. As the way this is worded, ACHD gets the interest starting October 1 . Bird: I think the Mayor had stated that to them at that exact same thing. Another thing, our legal counsel has not had a chance to look this over. He just didn't get it same time we did. Corrie: Well I think the statement that our City Attorney pretty well describes my feelings about this is that definitely the money should be given as needed rather than dumping 1.8 million ot that into - it doesn't even cost that. I would suggest that we go back at least to tell them that our attorney needs to look this over and perhaps even re-write some at it tor them, and we will discuss this if the Council Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 ' Page 29 ( approval on the second Tuesday of January of 2001. So that we make sure that we've got all our people together on this, I think we really did commit ourselves to doing that, but whether it was that full amount at one time is not what I thought so I think we do need to discuss it. If that is agreeable to everyone here that we will put that on the agenda - Mr. President if you would put that on the agenda on that second Tuesday that we can discuss it. Bird: For the workshop? Corrie: For the workshop -- Bird: All right let's do her-- Corrie: And then discuss even amongst ourselves. Bird: Mr. Clerk wants something. Corrie: Mr. Berg. Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, I have been talking with ACHD with our quarterly meetings. One is set up or would have been setup for January 1st and it has been switch to January 8th at noon which would be just before your workshop which I guess you could get some feed back from them at that meeting if you need to discuss or reiterate your feelings on which was said. So, just so you have some timing there if you want to discuss that we can put it on the agenda for that lunch workshop. Corrie: That's here? Are we having it here? Berg: I don't know for sure where it's at. We're just trying to get open dates for them. Corrie: I definitely want to talk to some of the Commissioners before that meeting, too. Does Council want to have that meeting here, at noon; we'd host it? Bird: I would like to. Corrie: Okay, let host it here. Tell them we'll do it at noon here. c. City Clerk - Will Berg: 1 . Request by Jeff Manship to discuss Tremont Place Subdivision Development Agreement Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 30 Corrie: Then the last item we have here is Will Berg's request by Jeff Manship to discuss Tremont Place Subdivision Development Agreement. Will. Berg: Thank you Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, I don't know if this is necessarily a department report from me, but I received a letter from Jeff Manship that he requested to discuss with the Council change in the Development Agreement for Tremont Place. He wanted the opportunity to speak to you and it was easiest to just added to my department report, but it's really just an item for discussion. You did receive a letter in your packets kind of describing the discussion issue that Jeff would like to present. Corrie: Jeff. Manship: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, Jeff Manship, Pinnacle Engineers. I represent Mike Coleman of Luna Vista Incorporated. Basically what Mike is asking for is an amendment to the Development Agreement. He would like to phase his project and basically construct all the lots north of the Nine Mile Drain first. Get them recorded so that he can sell lots and then as soon as they are recorded work on the south half and this is due to weather conditions in the upcoming winter months. I talked to Shari Stiles before this meeting, and she is concerned about Nine Mile Drain. I talked to John Carpenter tonight, and he said that Nampa Meridian has delivered pipe out to the site, and they are going to start working on that culvert - Stiles: For the lateral? Manship: Right, so they are making progress on that. That's kind of a run-down on it. I believe Item No. 14 of the Development Agreement states that this can be done if we entered into an Addendum Agreement stating when the improvements would be completed and so on and so forth. I don't know if you have a copy of the Development Agreement in front of you or if - I have one here. Questions? Stiles: Mr. Mayor and Council, I guess to just kind of clarify what I was concerned about was the Rutledge Lateral that's on the southern boundary here, and because of the phasing of the project if they were to come in and say they were to decide they wanted to develop this in the springtime, if the water were already in that ditch they wouldn't be able to get building permits for any of these lots here. I just wanted them to be aware of. The way that the Development Agreement is written is that they have to bond for all the improvements which I assume they did as part the City Engineers signature on the plat. That would also include the pathway along the Nine Mile Drain. The Nine Mile Drain will not be piped. It will be left open and be developed as a pathway along this portion, and I don't have any objections to them phasing that project as they have discussed as long as they are aware that all of the improvements will need to be completed for the entire subdivision in order for occupancies to be - in order for Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 ' Page 31 ( them to received occupancy for any of these buildings south of Nine Mile Creek. (inaudible) But I believe if they could amend their Development Agreement to just - it would cover Broadway Avenue and all the street improvements within this section of the subdivision. If they were allowed to phase it and amend their Development Agreement to permit that phasing, then could actually get occupancies on these lots; they just couldn't get any building permits for the remainder of it until the other improvements are completed. Manship: That's our intentions. Anderson: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Anderson. Anderson: What was the pipe you were talking about then, Jeff? That you said Nampa and Meridian dropped off, are they paying for the pipe on the Rutledge Lateral or what? Manship: That's something I am going to have to look into to. Shari mentioned that tonight when we talked briefly. Was that for the Rutledge Lateral or the Nine Mile Drain? Stiles: The Nine Mile Drain is to remain open; the Rutledge Lateral is to be piped. Manship: Okay, it was for the Rutledge. Anderson: Nampa and Meridian is paying for that pipe? Stiles: Usually the applicant will pay for the pipe and then they'll do the labor. Manship: I had my laterals and drainages mixed there. Sorry. Please excuse me. Nichols: Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Mr. Nichols. Nichols: Mr. Mayor and members of the Council, if we are going to do an amendment, or actually and addendum, as the way I would put it to this Development Agreement. It would be helpful if Mr. Manship could work out with Shari or whoever designated on her staff and say what's in Phase 1, what has to be done before there's any occupancy permits or building permits or something, whatever the deal is on Phase 1; what's in Phase 2 so that we put that in the addendum sets out what's to be completed and what isn't before those first lots can be sold in terms of street improvements and these other things so there is a Meridian City Council Meeting (' December 5,2000 ' Page 32 ( real clear understanding of what they have to do, and it will help me put it together. Stiles: So then the actual addendum would come back before the Council and they would approve and addendum? Nichols: I believe. Mayor and members of the Council, Shari, if I heard Mr. Manship's reading of that provision correctly it requires an addendum to that agreement rather than amending the agreements. So, it would be something that would be signed by the Mayor and attested by the Clerk and then signed by the applicant. Stiles: Thank you. Corrie: So they would bring it back to us on the 19th? Nichols: That's fine. Corrie: With that I move to the agenda has been completed. So 1'1) entertain a motion to adjourn. Bird: What a minute. We've got to make a motion on that. Corrie: That's what I said; I would here a motion on it. Nichols: Mr. Mayor, you get done with this action item, and I just have an information item, and then I'll be quiet. Corrie: Then why don't we do that before we close then. Go ahead. Nichols: Well, I think maybe you want us to go ahead on this - my question, Mayor and members of the Council, do you want us to go ahead a proceed with the Addendum for Mr. Manship and his client? Corrie: Yes, go ahead and bring it back to us. That was my understanding. Nichols: The information item that I have is at the workshop the Council asked that we look into the issue of what it would take to raise up to the .004 mill levy. I contacted the League of Oregon City - see that you hear I am going back to my prior wife - the AIC, and Mr. Harward furnished us with some examples of what some others cities have done as well as a memo that lays out procedures, and I have a copy for each of you and a copy of for Mr. Berg. Bird: Thank you. We will put this on the workshop for the second Tuesday in January. Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 ' Page 33 ( Corrie: Mr. Berg. . Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council. I just wanted to confirm that we weren't going to have a workshop or anything on the 26th; correct? McCandless: Correct. Bird: Correct. Berg: Secondly, just to remind you of the information that I copied and put in your boxes concerning AIC Legislative Committee that the Mayor and I went to that had a run-down on all the different issues that the Legislative Committee talked about and supported and to discuss further that make sure you review those and keep abreast to the situation because it will probably be an interesting legislative session. Corrie: Should be. Berg: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Corrie: Is there anyone that would like to volunteer as an alternate for the Transportation Committee before I tell you who it is? (inaudible discussion amongst Council members) Corrie: Cherie would you like to volunteer? McCandless: Not particularly. Corrie: I know Tammy will. De Weerd: No. Corrie: I guarantee they only meet at two o'clock in the morning, so it will be right down -- De Weerd: Only if you promise. Corrie: Okay, I'll entertain a motion for adjournment. Anderson: So moved. Bird: Second. Corrie: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor of the motion say aye. ("- Meridian City Council Meeting ( December 5, 2000 Page 34 MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:10 P.M. (TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) APPROVED: ~~~J5guJ WilLIAM G. BERG, JR., C (f - ORDINANCE NO. 896 BY: /2un-/Jh~f~ elk; ClJtvn~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING TITLE 2 CHAPTER 4 SECTION I OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE, PLANNING AND ZONING MEETINGS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS; THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHALL BE HELD ON THE FIRST AND THIRD THURSDAYS OF EACH MONTH, AND IN THE EVENT A PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING FALLS ON A HOLIDAY, THE MEETING SHALL NOT BE HELD ON THAT THURSDAY BUT SHALL BE HELD ON THE FOLLOWING THURSDAY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, State of Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of the said City to amend the Meridian City Code to provide that there shall be two regular Planning and Zoning Commission meetings to be held the first and third Thursdays of each month, and to provide that wh,ere a regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is scheduled on a Thursday in November that is a holiday, the Planning and Zoning meeting shall not be held on that Thursday but shall be held on the following Thursday. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Title 2, Chapter 4, Section I of the Meridian City Code of the City of Meridian is hereby amended and shall read as follows: 2-4-1 TIME AND PLACE OF MEETINGS: Time And Place Of Meetings: The regular meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City shall be held at the Meridian City Hall at 33 East Idaho Street, b~y' the chairman and Planning and Zoning Commission members on the second first and third Tuesday" Thursday of Amended Ordinance changing Time and Place of Planning and Zoning Commission Meetings I each month at seven o'clocl( (7:00) P.M. of said days. If the said second first or third Tuesday Thursday of any month is a holiday, the meeting shall not be held on that Tuesday Thursday but shall be held the following Thursday at the same hour and place. SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 3: r VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declar~d for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance takes effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January I, 200 I, after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PASSED BY TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this ~ day of 1JgC€-I-~~ ,2000. APPRO~D BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this f)-ffl- day of ~CfZht--~ , 2000. fJ Mayor Robert D. Corrie ATTEST: City Clerk SEAL. ~ ~ ~ - '"? 0- ~ ~~ "cs O~ ~ ~~, ~~/ISj 1Si ~ ~ ~:~ /.... V:"r 'I to,.: ~< /" ~ ~\ ........ ':, - 1 C ,V "-,,. '//f'\ OUt\rT'l, ,\\" Z:\W ork\M\Meridian \Meridian 15360 M\Ordinances Ci tylIalI.'AOQO QJ:(Hh'inces\PZTimePlaceChangeOrd.wpd . ~ '". 11II ~ .. Amended Ordinance changing Time and Place of Planning and Zoning Commission Meetings 2 interoffice MEMORANDUM ( RECEIVED DEe 0 7 2000 ITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE To: William G. Berg, Jr. From: Subject: City Council Change of Time and Place Ordinance 897 Date: December 7, 2000 Will: P~ease find attached the original of the ordinance pertaining to the time and place for the change in the City Council meetings. This original is the stril(e- through and underlined ordinance, which was revised to delete the pre-council meetings, and you should use this one. Additionally, you should already be in possession of the Planning and . Zoning Time and Place Ordinance, with the stril(e-through and underlines, which was delivered to your office on November 29,2000, and you should use that one also. Please advise if you cannot find it. If you need anything further, please so advise. /:;1-~:) +0 rv-Pl~_ ~ ~ ~~~cV_ as' ~ ?Xt6)/ ~ msg/Z:\ W ork\M\Meridian \Meridian 15360 M\Ordinances City Hall\2000 Ordinances\Berg 120 700 .Mem ORDINANCE NO. 897 BY: 7i!mJnt-1 de tcJltiUt:C t/l:yttJ~ ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING TITLE 1 CHAPTER 7 SECTION 5 A OF THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE, COUNCIL MEETINGS, TIME AND PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS; PROVIDING THAT THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE COUNCIL MEETINGS SHALL BE AT 6:30 P.M. ON THE NIGHT OF ANY REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND THE REGULAR MEETING SHALL BE HELD ON THE FIRST, THIRD AND FOURTH TUESDAYS AND THE FOURTH TUESDAY SHALL CONTAIN NO HEARINGS OR ACTION ON LAND USE APPLICATIONS, AND THE SECOND TUESDAY SHALL BE A CITY COUNCIL WORICSHOP OF EACH MONTH, AND IN THE EVENT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING FALLS ON A HOLIDAY OR TUESDAY ON WHICH A CITY OR GENERAL ELECTION IS HELD, THE MEETING SHALL NOT BE HELD ON THAT TUESDAY BUT SHALL BE HELD ON THE FOLLOWING WEDNESDAY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Meridian, State of Idaho, have concluded that it is in the best interest of the said City to amend the Meridian City Code to provide that the fourth Tuesday shall contain no hearings or action on land use applications, additionally, the second Tuesday shall be the City Council worlcshop, and to provide that where a City Council meeting is scheduled on a Tuesday that is a City Council primary, or general election day, the Council meeting shall not be held on that Tuesday but shall be held on the following Wednesday. Amended Ordinance changing Time and Place of City Council Meetings 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That Title I, Chapter 7, Section 5 A of the Meridian City Code of the City of Meridian is hereby amended and shall read as follows: 1-7-5 COUNCIL MEETINGS: A~ Time And Place Of Regular Meetings: The regular meetings of the City Council shall be held at the Meridian City Hall at 33 East Idaho Street, by the Mayor and City Council on the first, aRtl third~ and fourth Tuesdays of each month, and that the fourth lueeting shall be a general meeting with no hearings or action on land use applications~ and the second Tuesday shall be the City Council workshop~ at seveR six thirty o'clocl( (7Q :30) P.M. of said days. If a Tuesday of any month is a holiday, City election, primary or general election, the meeting shall be held the Wednesday evening following at the same hour and place. SECTION 2: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 3:. VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination. herefrom of any portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 4: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance takes effect. SECTION 5: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force a11d effect after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. Amended Ordinance changing Time and Place of City Council Meetings 2 (E ( \ PASSED BY THE CI~ COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 5'0- day of re f'h,~ , 2000. APPROVED Bl\THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 5-1- day of ,!)-e~~ . , 2000. [J, Mayor Robert D. Corrie \'\ \ \ \It.U .'tlt f.lt/ ATTEST .\,\ -^t: UJ::h~1111 : , ~ \.\ '\....J V' · .~/"l. 1// JI: . " A..' ~~~. ~'" 'CJ'~' ~'/ ~ Of\P~h ~'''- .:: ~CJ ~ ~'-. 2 ~ ~~. - ~. ~ "PAL ~~ .~ "" .l:4 =: ~ i': #.~: - ~ -Ill '~t, -.;.p g ~ r.,#)....,"Vr 1~:-\ ~ .~ ~v~ I ~ ~ r" ~~ a ~", ....';'/) ~rr'l. ,\", 1111 "\" z:\ W ork\M\Meridian \Meridian 153 601v1.\Ordinances City Hal1\2000 ~tarAah~J~;\CcrimePlaceChangeOrd.wpd Amended Ordinance changing Time and Place of City Council Meetings 3 ., ( \, November 30, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 5,2000 APPLICANT Warren and Jeanie Pemberton ITEM NO. R REQUEST Agreement to hook up to City Sewer - 940 South Mustang Drive AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: See attached CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: (lY .[ U ~pf C rJ K(k~ j -- (fts~ MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( interoffice MEMORANDUM To: William G. Berg, Jr. RECEIVED N 0 V 2 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN cc: Gary Smith, Public W s (Agreement) From: Subject: Warren B. and eanie M. Pemberton Sewer Hookup Date: November 28,2000 Will: Please find enclosed the originals of the Order Granting Application to Provide City Sewer Service Outside the City Limits Subject to Conditions and the Agreement for Hookup to the City of Meridian's Sewer System Outside the City Lilnits, for the above matter. The Agreement does not require water hoolcup until the property is sold or use changes. First, please have the Order signed by the Mayor and then attest it. Secondly, have the Mayor sign the Agreement as it is authorized in the Order. Upon the Mayor's execution of both the Order and Agreement, please then have Mr. and Mrs. Pemberton execute the Agreement. After both documents have been fully signed please forward copies of the Order a11d the Agreement to Mr. and Mrs. Pelnberton. I have also included the original of the Resolution and Certificate of ClerIc. Additionally, after your office has the original Agreement recorded, please sublnit copies of those two documents upon the Public W orlcs Department and the City Attorney. If you have any questions, please advise. msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 1 5360M\Pemberton Sewer Hookup\Bergl12700Mem ( BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. ) PEMBERTON FOR CITY SEWER SERVICE) OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROVIDE CITY SEWER SERVICE OUT- SIDE THE CITY LIMITS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS [MERIDIAN CITY CODE S 9-4-26J The above entitled matter coming before the City Council on the 21 st day of November, 2000, and Gary Smith, Public Works Director, and the Applicants, Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton, having appeared and the Council being fully advised finds and orders as follows: 1. Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton, husband and wife, are the ovvners of the following described real property: (Need legal), hereinafter referred to as "Subject Real Property~". 2. "Subject Real Property" is outside of the City limits of the City of Meridian. 3. Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton have made application for the providence of City sewer to the "Subject Real Property". 4. The Public W orl(5 Director has reviewed the circumstances presented by the application,. The Public Works Director has included the effect the granting of ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROVIDE CITY SEWER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS [MERIDIAN CITY CODE s 9-4-26J - PAGE 1 OF 5 ( this application would have upon the ability of the Municipal Sewer System to provide an acceptable level of service to developed parcels with existing service within the City limits, of which, there is no evidence there will be any compromise of that service by the granting of this application. 5. The Applicant has agreed to all of the required conditions of the provision of the service as required in Meridia11 City Code S 9-4-26. 6. Upon recommendation of the Public Works Director, and consent of the Applicants, it is found that it is reasonable to include as an additional condition of granting this order that the Applicant malce immediate application for annexation and zoning of the "Subject Real Property". Also, as a condition of the continued providence of City sewer service, the Applicants/owners of the "Subject Real Property" shall. talce no steps to impede the annexation process. 7. Future Water Connection: Upon transfer of this property to any other person, or upon change in use of the real property, the owner, their successors or assigns, shall at their expense malce connection to the City water system and pay all fees associated therewith. Failure to make the water connection will be grounds for discontinuance of City sewer service. DECISION AND ORDER Now, therefore, based upon the above and foregoing Order Granting ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROVIDE CITY SEWER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS [MERIDIAN CITY CODE s '9-4-26J - PAGE 2 OF 5 Application to Provide City Sewer Service Outside the City Limits, the City Council has hereby Ordered and this does Order that the City sewer service be provided to the "Subject Real Property" subject to the following conditions: I. Prior to Service, as provided for in 9 9-4-26, the City may provide service from the Municipal sewer system to individual properties that are partially or entirely outside the corporate limits of the City. Each request for such service must be approved by the City Council and all regulations of these Chapters must be complied with by such special sewer users. The sewer user will be considered a special user as long as the property being served remains outside the corporate limits of the City. The special sewer user shall be charged an installation charge, connection charge and a monthly user charge which shall be the same as a user within the City limits. 2. Prior to Service the Owners of the "Subject Real Property" malce immediate application for annexation and zoning of the "Subject Real Property", and as a condition of the continued providence of City sewer service that the Applicant/Owners of the "Subject Real Property" talce no steps to impede the annexation process. 3. Future Water Connection: Upon transfer of this property to any other person, or upon change in use of the real property, the owner, their successors or ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROVIDE CITY SEWER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS [MERIDIAN CITY CODE 9 9-4-26] - PAGE 3 OF 5 assigns, shall at their expense make connection to the City water system and pay all fees associated there"With. Failure to malce the water connection "Will be grounds for discontinuance of City sewer service. 4. That the City Attorney prepare and submit to the City Clerk the Agreement for the Provision of Sewer Service Outside the City Limits ordered herein. 5. The Mayor is herein authorized to sign and the Clerk to attest the Agreement for the Provision of Sewer Service Outside the City Limits prepared as provided in part 3 of this Order "Without further action of the Council. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian. Pursuant to Idaho Code S 67-6521 an affected person is a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by the issuance or denial of the annexation and zoning and who may "Within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order seek a judicial review as provided by Chapter 52, Title 67, Idaho Code. 2/Sh I ~tFeh-L~ Dated this. I' day of II tV , 2000. ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROVIDE CITY SEWER SERVICE OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS [MERIDIAN CITY CODE s 9-4-26] - PAGE 4 OF 5 ( (- Copy served upon Applicant, Planning and Zoning Department, Public Works Department and the City Attorney. ATIEST: \\ \. \ nUl-tntltlfll \. ',\\ Of MJ':~ 1t,,1:. ~ '\.. ~ ' =---___lIQ I/~ "",~~ ~A-..~? ~ U'" ~h '-11' ~ ~ ~G ~^ ~ ~ . ~ v ~ -~ 'i: /1- 21--tJO~ SEAL.. ~ - ~ ~.. ~ -~~..... ~ ~ ,~~ - '" D .... ~~ "0. ~fSr 194{ ~- ~- ,? .~,~ =1 "', ~ ,~.' '~/.1 ~' ~,~ Z:\W ork\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Pemberton Sewer Hookup\OrderGrantingHookup .Ir'~lll11 ~,- "N1", ~<\t-\\\\\\" .~"JH nU'" By: City ClerIc ( RECEIVED DEe - 9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN interoffice MEMORANDUM To: William G. Berg, J From: Marlene St. Gear Subject: Pemberton Sewer Hookup Agreement Date: December 8, 2000 Will: It has been brought to my attention that the Pembertons live at 940 S. Mustang Street, not Mustang Drive. Therefore, I have revised the agreement to reflect that they live at 940 S. Mustang Street. Please replace either the pages where necessary, or here is a whole new revised originaI~ I believe the only areas where the changes are, are at pages 5 and 10. If you have any questions please give me a call. -~ ~/r: t~ up1 \'tl~ U I fo <:1 'A. ()Jf~' .J-.~S /71.06 yvlJl" I'll r if j rrvl r 9 In! /U~ t pl~';/ - 'VJ-' f'/-~ ' ~/fv msglZ:\ W ork\M\Meridian \Meridian 15360 M\Pemberton Se\-ver Hookup\Berg 120800. Mem ( interoffice MEMORANDUM To: William G. Berg, Jr. RECEIVED DEe 1 4 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN From: Marlene St. Geor e Subject: Pemberton Sewer Hookup Agreement Date: December 13, 2000 Please find attached the original page 5 to the Pemberton Sewer Hookup Agreelnent, pursuant to your notation for the change in address under the Meridian City Engineer. If you need anything further, please advise. \>htt . ~}JV.. ej/ I. .' ().. vL. " '. I .....'... :f.: ~ '. 1.7' ~/10 t"",,,; #r~~-t~ au?tlln~ .. _., .', ~~/../f"i- ". ~Y." !!iY J _ }. i",,- tf ~~1?""" tt fJ ,- ." f~'~ .' . , ~j (. . JIIv~. ~. PJ/l,~ '. ~J { \;. .~.~. . .l'lct.j\..Jl j'1Lf -;.>v-1 r 'f -.L'. . r!~~+~ 'pl"'\ " II msgjZ:\ W ork\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Pemberton Sewer Hookup\Berg121300 .Mem ( CERTIFICATE OF CLERIC OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN I, the undersigned, do hereby certify: 1. That I am the duly appointed and elected Clerk of the City of Meridian, a duly incorporated City operating under the laws of the State of Idaho, with its principal office at 33 East Idaho, Meridian, Idaho. 2. That as the City Clerl( of this City, I am the custodian of its records and minutes and do hereby certify that on the day of 2000, the following action has been tal(en and authorized: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERIC TO SIGN AND ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED llAGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS", BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, HUSBAND AND WIFE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, husband and wife, denoted as llAGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS", a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit llA" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are set forth in said Agreelnent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, as follows: Cert. of Clerk (Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton) - 1 of 2 ( ( I. The Mayor and Clerl< are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, husband and wife, entitled "AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS", dated the day of ,2000, by and between the City of Meridian and WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, husband and wife, a copy of which is attached hereto marl<ed as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. William G. Berg, Jr. STATE OF IDAHO,) : ss. County of Ada, ) On this day of , in the year 2000, before me, , a Notary Public, appeared WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., known or identified to me to be the City Clerl< of the City of Meridian, Idaho that executed the said instrument, and aclmowledged to me that he executed the same on behalf of the City of Meridian. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho COlnmission Expires: Cert. of Clerk (Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pelnberton) - 2 of 2 ( .(}J V ~o() li/''l RESOLUTION NO. BY: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN FINDINGS AND PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERIC TO SIGN AND ENTER INTO, ON BEHALF OF SAID MUNICIPALITY, AN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT FOR HOOICUP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS", BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AND WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, HUSBAND AND WIFE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Meridian to enter into an agreement with WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, husband and wife, denoted as "AGREEMENT FOR HOOI<UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS", a copy of which is attached hereto marlced las Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, the reasons and authority for which are set forth in said Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, as follows: I. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into and on behalf of the City of Meridian that certain agreement with WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, husband and wife, entitled "AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS", dated the day of , 2000, by and between the City of Meridian and WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, husband and wife, a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution and to bind this City to its terms and conditions. Resolution (Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton) - 1 of 2 ( { PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 2000. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this day of , 2000. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Z:\W ork\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Pemberton Sewer Hookup\Resolution Resolution (Warrel1 B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton) - 2 of 2 AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS \ _ . L n _ THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 5~ day of ~cel?L ~ ] 2000] by and between CITY OF MERIDIAN, a Municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and WARREN B. and JEANIE M. PEMBERTON, husband and wife, as hereinafter defined and hereinafter referred to as "SEWER USER". 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, "Sewer User" is the sole ovvner, in law and/or in equity of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of . Idaho, described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as the "Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code sSO-323, provides and empowers cities to establish, create, develop, maintain and operate sewer systems; and 1.3 WHEREAS, "City" operates and maintains and develops a sewer system; and 1.4 WHEREAS, the "City" has enacted an ordinance governing its sewer systelTI codified in Meridian City Code ~ 9-4-26; and 1.5 WHEREAS, the " Sewer User" is the ovvner of "Real Property" hereinafter described which is presently located outside of the city limits of the "City"; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the "Sewer User" is desirous of obtaining connection to the sewer to serve the "Real Property" and the "City" is willing to provide that connection to the sewer service to the "Sewer User" subject to the terms and conditions and consideration of this agreement, and it is specifically agreed that as a specific considerat~on of the "City's" willingness to enter into this agreement that the "City's" "Ordinance" and AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 1 ( "PolicylRegulations" which govern its sewer system be included as terms and conditions of this agreement and that the "Sewer User" provide perpetllal consent to annexation of the "Real Property" in to the "City". 2. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires othenvise: 2.1 "City": means and refers to the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho. 2.2 "Sewer User": means and shall refer to Warren B. and Jeanie oM. Pemberton, husband and wife, and/or the person who is the owner of the real property. 2.3 "Real Property": means and shall refer to certain parcel(s) of real property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length together with improvements thereon. 2.4 "Ordinance": means and shall refer to the City's ordinances that appertain to the regulation and control and use of its sewer system presently codified at Meridian City Code S 9-4-26, and this definition specifically includes any prospective amendments and/or recodifications to said ordinance or any parts thereof, and shall also refer to any other ordinance of the City of Meridian governing the "Sewer System". 2.5 "PolicylRegulations": means and shall refer to any City Council enacted policy and/or regulation of its sewer system. 2.6 "Sewer System": means and shall refer to the City's sewer system. AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PENIBERTON/ - 2 ( NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follovvs: 34 INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 4. PROVISION OF SEWER HOOI(UP SERVICE: The "City" agrees to provide a connection to the "Sewer System" to service the "Real Property" subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement4 Future Water Connection: Upon transfer of this property to any other person, or-upon change in use of the real property, the ovvner, their successors or assigns, shall at their expense make connection to the City water system and pay all fees associated therewith. Failure to make the water connection will be grounds for discontinuance of City sewer service. 5. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF SEWER USER FOR THE HOOI(UP OF THE SEWER LINE TO THE REAL PROPERTY: The hookup and assessment costs relative to the "Sewer System" connection shall be the responsibility of the "Sewer User". 6. ORDINANCE APPLICATION: The "Ordinance" and "PolicylRegulations" apply to the sewer service and connection and are herein incorporated as specific terms of this agreement and at such time or times as the "Ordinance" and/or "PolicylRegulations" is/are amended or recodified, this agreement is automatically amended in accordance therewith. 7. ANNEXATION: The "Sewer User" is required to immediately subn1it an application for annexation of the "Real Property", which is a condition precedent to the "Sewer User's" eligibility for the "Real Property" sewer service connection fee within the City limit rates. T11e "Sewer User" herein gives consent to such annexation, agrees to pay the annexation application fee, agrees to apply for annexation, and diligently pursue AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 3 (- annexation into the City. This provision of this Agreement is a written request and application for 'such annexation in accordance with I.C. S 50-222 or any amendments or recodification of said statute. 8. HOOI(UP AND SERVlCE FEES: The charges for hool(up, inspection, and service fees shall be in accordance with the provisions of the "Ordinance" and/or "PolicylRegulations" as are applicable for real properties outside of the city limits. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: "City" shall record either a memorandum of this Agreement or this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, at "Sewer User" cost, and submit proof of such recording to " Sewer User". 10. DEFAULT: Any failure to perform the terms and conditions of this agreelnent shall be a default. 11. REMEDIES: 11.1 This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by either "City" or "Sewer User", or by any successor or successors in title or by the assigns of the parties hereto. Enforcement may be sought by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secur~ the specific performance of the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein. In addition, remedies available to the City include but are not limited to, termination of sewer service to all users located on the real property covered by this agreement. 11.2 In the event of a default, written Notice of Default shall be served and defaultin~party shall then have thirty (30) days after delivery of notice of default to correct the same before the non- defaulting party may seel<. any remedy provided for herein. 11.3 In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either "Sewer User" or "City" is delayed for Ca1.1SeS AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 4 which are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, stril<.es or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 12. NOTICES: 12.1 Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: do Meridian City Engineer City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Suite # 101 Meridian, Idaho 83642 PROPERTY OWNER: Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton 940 S. Mustang Dr. Meridian, Idaho 83642 with copy to: City CIerI, City of Meridian 33 E. Idaho Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 12.2 A party shall have the right to change their address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 13. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 5 ( 14. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto aclmowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreelnent by the other party so failing to perfom1. 15. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including "City's" corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the ovvner of the property, each subsequent owner and each other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefitted and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. 16. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised therefrom and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 17. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between "Sewer User" and "City" relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or vvritten, express or implied, between "Sewer User" and "City", other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to "City", a duly adopted resolution of "City". AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 6 ( 18. TERMINATION: At such time as the "Real Property" is annexed into the City" this agreement shall terminate except for any default that exists at such time shall still be enforceable pursuant to the terms of this agreement. AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERlDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 7 f/ (,r_ 19. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Agreement shall be effective at such time as both parties have executed this Agreement. ACI<NOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. PROPERTY OWNERS WARREN B. PEMBERTON JEANIE M. PEMBERTON CITY OF MERIDIAN By: MAYOR ROBERT D. CORRIE ATTEST: WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., CITY CLERI( BY RESOLUTION NO. AGREEMENT FOR HOOI<UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 8 STATE OF IDAHO, County of Ada : 55. ) On this day of , in the year 2000, before me, , a Notary Public, personally appeared Warren B. and Jeanie M. Pemberton, husband and wife, knovvn or identified to me to be the persons who executed the instrument, and acl<.novvledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) On this day of , in the year 2000, before me, , a Notary Public, personally appeared ROBERT D. CORRIE and WILLIAM G. BERG, JR., l<.nown or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the persons that executed the instrument on behalf of said City, and acl<.nowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho Residing at: My Commission Expires: z:\ W ork\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Pemberton Sewer Hookup\SewerHookupAgmt AGREEMENT FOR HOOlillP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 9 ( f ( EXHIBIT HA" Lot IS in Blocl( 2 of Locust View Heights Subdivision, according to the Official Plat thereof, filed in Bool( 24 of Plats at Page 1514, Official Records of Ada County, Idaho. Also l<.nown by the physical address of: 940 S. Mustang Drive, Meridian, Idaho. AGREEMENT FOR HOOI(UP TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN'S SEWER SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WARREN B. AND JEANIE M. PEMBERTON/ - 10 November 3D, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 5, 2000 APPLICANT DBSI ITEM NO. 11 REQUEST Request by DBSI for approval of a private road IISouth Tech Placell AGENCY CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION; IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: COMMENTS ylJJLl &uf~ Date: Phone: Materials presented at pubnc meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. L.VU uuu UU.J"'+, uec":l- UU ,_1 :,J ~J)4f-'M: -,. ,_._ Eaqe 2 ;f" , JV-30-00 THU 08:17 PM . """\ DB$I GROUP OF COMPANIES ( FAX NO. 20832-2',- ( ct6~ YVt~ [2 -t;:- 00 -. . - - .- ~_. -.. ~ ----. - -_ _i _--- ...:- "__- DBSI ffymNv~ 11 I~EAL TY COI~PORA TIC~_-~ Quority II.lvcrstn"lonts in ~ool t: stoto November 30, 2000 Ms. Shari L. SInes Planning Director City of Meridian j 200 E. CarJton. Suite 201 ~ Meridian, 10 83642 : VIA FAX.: 888-6854 1 Dear Shari: ~ As per our conversation this date, we respectfully request City CounoiJ approval on ~ Tuesday I December 5th. of the private street, desIgnated as s. Tech Lane by the Ada J County Street Name Committee. We have built this street according to Ada County i specifications with inspections done by Strata Engineering. : Please help us t\ave a street number assigned. as we will moving into the facility before ; Christmas. and need to notify our customers and vendors as soon as possible. We also 1 need to have our letterhead stationary and business cards. etc. I printed at the earliest ~ date possible. ' t We are excited for our new manufacturing facility and hope to see you, tha Mayor, and ! Council members for a tour In the next couple of weeks. This facility will be a world j class employment centar for the City of Meridian. j We appreciate your help as always. Best regard$, {d \~ .... .~_t~~ D Ii Bradshaw Director of Construction fRECEIVEO DEe 0 5 2000 CITY OF MERiDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE 1070 North Curtis ROi\cJf $ujt~ 270 · U'Jifle, Idaho 83706 · (208) 322..5858 DEe 05 00 11:09 208 888 6854 PAGE. 02 ,', DEC-Ol-OO FRI 10:31 AM DBSI GROUP OF COMPANIES ~~~~e9/1e/2aee le:25 2Bf 3-3124 ~ - -- - - "'" .... . _ . \J -r Il\'l , rdY~ ~/'+ P. 02 OOL.LIE~ FAX NO. 2083225861 ( PAGE aI/at ~tQIn PDet-1t- Fax Note 1671 DatD Co, ~I\S . .. r- ~ . . I I f I . I 1 I , 1 , I~ , jr\ ': ,\J , ~I~ ! il i~ I ~ I J_ :f j 11 I , j t I , . ; ! I , f . . l I ~ . o ; J . ? : 1 i r .. : (i 2 ;: ~ ~ L~. J I N 9 re.'\-H ~ - - -- . -..... - ~ ~ --- r. . I I i . j I I f , I j . i I I- I ;~ j-f- . I . . I j If): 01 ~j ~I ,.:L' 1:l1 ~I ~; , -----J CON Ce::r/JTv4L B U I t.D I /J~ "PLl41U S ..Q1JG,...x -- ~~:~ If .. r .. .... q~% ~pu;;n; 12(, ... ED 000 " CITY OF MERIDiAN CITY CLERK OFFICE DEe 05 '00 11:10 208 BRA h~C:::a par::c fA7 - -- - - -........ .. --. .. '-'.....J I fV', rc:t~c 't/~ PI 03 /. :~~NQV-30-00 THU DB: 17 PM DB~F GROUP OF COMPANIES / \ FAJc: NO. 2083?_?5861 ( SUBDIVISION EVALUATION SHEET Proposed DeveJopment Name Datr Reviewed__1:1lP.(OQ Treasure Vanev Technical Center File No. Preliminary Stage Fin;al X En~lneer/D8v8loper Marilyn Fuller, Desl GroUD of Companle8 Th~ Street name eommenb listed below 91'8 made by the members of the ADA COUNTY ST~EET NAME COMMITTEE (under direction of the Ada County Engineer) regarding this de~elopment in accordance with the Ada County Street Name Ordinance. --"""l""'- \ { Th~ foIlQ)YmLe.&stin9 street name ahaIJ aDDear on the Dlat: ' < . . uW. OVERLAND ROAD" jh~ following stree~e has been 3pproved! ............~.....--.-"-. ........... w-'...... ..~. Tf;CH ~~MJ:" ~ -.....t---. i Th." above street name ~omm8nt5 have blten read and approved by the followIng agency representatives of the ADA COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE. ALL of the sIgnatures m~st be secured by the representative or his designee In order for the streit name. to be o~claJly approved. A~A COUNTY STREET NAME COMMITTEE, ESENTATIVES OR DESIGNEES i A~a County Engineer John Priester Date II-CI - ~() Date /1-9-on Date LL~_.- ~ Date /1-:/3....00 C~mmunity Planning A.$soc. Linda Ritte j CI~ of -Meridian Cheryl Sable , M,ridlan Fire Dept. Represe ntatlve N~TE: A copy of this evaluatlon sheet must be presented to the Ada County Engineer at the time of signing the "final plat", otherwise the plat will not be signed 1111 SubIndex Street Index I 3N 1W1~ Section -RECEIVE- DEe 0 5 2000 CiTY OF MERlO\. C\TY CLERK OFF N~MBERING OF LOTS AND BLOCKS TRft;UBS\6mll" Clu...PRM DEe 05 00 11:10 208 888 6854 PAGE. 04 --- ............... '-J....,-,-r, uc~w~wuu I~;U~~M; t-'age 1 / I 200 E. C8rtton Ave., Ste. 201 Meridian, 10 83642 PtQle: (208)884-5533 FaX: (208)888-6854 CITY OF MERIDIAN Planning & Zoning T4x ! SHELBY ProIN Sonya Day paxz 888-4218 : Datet 121510O ..,.... ....: 4 (Including coyer) AM i DBSI-FOR 12/5100 MTG_ CCI au.,..- m For ........., o ....... Cu......... 0 ... - rtt Reply o PI....II8cJcI. .~am...... DEe 05 00 11:09 208 888 6854 l PAGE. 01 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNClL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PRIVATE STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE TREASURE VALLEY TECHNICAL CENTER, MERIDIAN, IDAHO BY: DBSI REALTY CORPORATIC APPLICANT. C/C 12-05-00 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER APPROVING A PRIVATE STREET This matter coming before the City Council on the 5th day of Decen1ber, 2000, under the provisions of Meridian City Code ss 8-2-4 A. and B., 8-2-5 A. 3. g. and B.l. a11d 2. a., and 8-2-6 B. and C. I. and 5. for final action upon the applicant's request for a private street, the Council takes the following action: I. That the Applicant is granted approval for their request for a private street; that the private street has been designated as S. Tech La11e by the Ada County Street NalTIe COlTIlnittee. The street has been built accordi11g to Ada County specifications with inspections done by Strata Engineering. The Applicant, through their letter dated November 30, 2000, has requested the Planning and Zoning DepartlTIent to assign S . Tech La11e a street number. 2. That the Applicant has met all the requirements under the provisions of ORDER APPROVING A PRIVATE STREET - 1 Meridian City Code 99 8-2-4 A. and B., 8-2-5 A. 3. g. a11d B.l. and 2. a., and 8-2-6 B. and c. I. and 5., and therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request of the Applicant for approval of their private street, to be lmovvn by the na111e of S. Tech Lane, is approved and that such street shall be assigned a street number by the Planni11g and Zoning Department. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the hCIlyn/~ !i~ day of , 2000. BY~~~Pt? ~ ity Clerk ' Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning and Zoning Department, .Public W orl(s Department and City Attorney. ~\):,\~~~j~~~/ltJh. .I~"" V' .~~;..~~ ~ 'J ~~J~ ~~. -f~. ~. ~S E . ',;: /2-~--Otl SEAL.. ~ ~ ~- ~~ fJ ~ 1".L ii'\. . ~ . n .;,,, ~~ 'Q .., r 18'~-'_ ~ 'i:.$~ ~~t ~~9';;~ 1ql&tfhttltn\t\\\' Dated: msg/Z:\W ork\M\Meridian\1v1eridian 15360M\DBSI Industrial V AR021 \OrderAPPORVINGPRIV ATEROAD.wpd ORDER APPROVING A PRIVATE STREET - 2 interoffice MEMORANDUM 'RECEIVED DEe 1,9 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN To: William G. Berg, Jr. From: Wm. F. Nichols Subject: DBSI Industrial (Private Street Approval) Date: December 11, 2000 - & -~ I d- ~l ct -ot)~ Will: PI.ease find attached the original of the Order Approving A Private Street, pursuant to action of the COU11Cil at their Decelnber 5, 2000, meeting. The Order vvill need to be executed by the Mayor and yourself. Please serve conformed copies of the Order upon the Applicant al1d the Planning and Zoning Department, Public W orles and the City Attor11ey office. If you have any questions arise please advise. msg/Z:\ W ork\M\Meridian \Meridian 15360 Iv1\D B S I Industrial V AR021 \berg 121100 PrivS treet.Menl BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PRIVATE STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE TREASURE VALLEY TECHNICAL CENTER, MERIDIAN, IDAHO BY: DBSI REALTY CORPORATIC APPLICANT. C/C 12-05-00 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER APPROVING A PRIVATE STREET This matter c~lning before the City Council on the 5th day of December, 2000, under the provisions of Meridian City Code ss 8-2-4 A. and B., 8-2-5 A. 3. g. and B.l. and 2. a., and 8-2-6 B. and C. 1. and 5. for final action upon the applicant's request for a private street, the Council takes the following action: 1. That the Applicant is granted approval for their request for a private street; that the private street has been designated as S. Tech Lane by the Ada County Street Name Committee. The street has bee11 built according to Ada County specifications with inspections done by Strata Engineering. The Applicant, through their letter dated November 30, 2000, has requested the Planning and Zoning Department to assign S. Tech Lane a street number. 2. That the Applicant has met all the requirements under the provisions of ORDER APPROVING A PRIVATE STREET - I Meridian City Code ss 8-2-4 A. and B., 8-2-5 A. 3. g. and B.l. and 2. a., and 8-2-6 B. and C. 1. and 5., and therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request of the Applicant for approval of their private street, to be lmown by the name of S. Tech Lane, is approved and that such street shall be assigned a street number by the Planning and Zoning Department. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the N:ce/1L-~ .~7J; day of , 2000. D. -Corrie, Mayor City of Meridian Copy served upon Applicant, the Planning a11d Zoning Department, Public W orles Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: - ~ . ~ _.~ ~- ~,~ ....~ D 2 \, "o~~r 18"\' ~ / "'.... ~ ~~ ,'- ''-j'/ ~. __ - ~ .,x ~/.... ,--vuNT't t ,\.'\.' { ''I-J- \ \' "I:J~_'<' t..t~.\\\ msg/Z:\Work\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\DBSI Industrial VAR021\OrderAPPORVINGPRIVATEROAD.wpd . ~~r ~ " ORDER APPROVING A PRIVATE STREET - 2 ( ( November 30, 2000 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 5, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer ITEM NO. 12-B-l REQUEST Request to hook up to City Sewer by Dianna Williamson - 2440 South Locust Grove Road AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUilDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~~y AL tl(~~ ~pWv _ ~r ~ r c.( C {J/r fA ~~ pv fJ~ {Uf~ Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. November 30, 2000 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 5, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith ITEM NO. 12-6-2 REQUEST WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No. 1 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: Contacted: vP #fP~ Date: Phone: Materials presented at pubnC meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. ( November 3D, 2000 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCil MEETING December 5, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith ITEM NO. 12-6-3 REQUEST WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension (Headworks) Change Order No.2 AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DE?T: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTR1CT: SANtT ARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ,f-,/ () \[ OutW1 Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at pubHc meetings shall become property of the City of Meridian. (.10 h/\JpO \d -5-DO l-kJm Nt). /7.--&-3 l1i'\vt . 12-./\97 ~ L} Memo To: Mayor Collie From: Brad Watson, P .Ew CC: File, Gary Smith, PE Date: 12/01/00 Re: July 5 City Council Meeting - Request for Items on Consent Agenda I am requesting the following three items be placed on the City Council meeting agenda for their consideration at the December 5 meeting. Both items involve the WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension Project which involves tying the 36" diameter sewer trunk from the north into the existing headworXs and modifications to the headworks itself. . 1) VVWTP Trunk Sewer Extension - Change Order No.1. Change Order No. 1 is requested from JC Constructors for four separc.rte things. A memo from JUS Engineers to me descnbing the changes is attached. Approval of this Change Order would increase the total contract amount to $66,879.43.. The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $5,119..43.. 2) WWTP T ronk Sewer Extension - Chanqe Order No.2. Change Order No. 2 is the addition of construction of a septage receiving station to the contract in the not to exceed amount of $32,000. A detailed construction cost estimate compiled by JUS Engineers is attached. The existing septage receiving faCIlity had to be demolished to allow installation of the new trunk. We intened to include the septage facility in the initial contract but the schedule of the Sews' mini-storage project did not allow us to get it designed in time for the bid. The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Change Order No. 2 in the not-to-exceed amount of $32,000.00. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you, Bra:1~ From 1he desk oC,. Brad WatsoA. P L A~ City Enginea- McrKtian Public Wod:a Ocpunraent 200 E. Carlton St. Su ice 1 00 Maidian, Idaho 83642-2600 . Page 1 (208) 887..22 t 1 Fax: (208) 887...1291 ~b@c::i.mcridion.. id.us ~-;HJ-e .. ~ ~ -i..... "<.::::- "y ~ i"".... H..... -<-> -.-~..u.~. ~N(iINEERS, Inc. Memo ",' .~'~ :,:::; ','I " ' , l' , To: Brad Watson, P.E. Meridian Public Works Department From: Phillip H. Krichbaum, P.E. -f ~ cc: File 11624-06 Date: 11/22/00 Re: WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension - Change Order Request, J.C. Constructors, Inc. Brad, J.C. Constructors has submitted a change order request. I have reviewed the request, and offer the following comments. N 0 V 2 7 2000 .....1 \!D~: : I C:: / -', _.. .':1, 1. Item No.1 - The bid quantity for the 36-inch trunk sewer was listed at 116 lineal feet. Thls quantity did not include the amount of pipe between the junction box and the headworks, which comprised an additional six (6) feet. The bid unit price of $110 per foot was used to obtain the requested amount of $660.00.. 2. Item No.2 - Native excavated materials contained a significant amount of soils which were deemed unsuitable for use as structural backfill. Approximately 180 CY of material was requIred, which should be verified with your resident project representatIve. The bid unit price of $15/CY was used to obtain the requested amount of $ 2,700. 3. Item No.3 - The construction plans did not show waterstop on the Structure walls, and therefore. was not included in the Contractor's Bid. As discussed in the preconstruction meeting, we requested that the Contactor install the waterstop. The requested amount for this work is $ 613, 11 4. Item No.4 - Connecting to the existing 3S-inch trunk sewer involved some unanticipated work. Specifically, the existing trunk sewer, currently under construction through private development, contained a significant amount of water. The Contractor had to rent a large capacity 6-lnch dewatering pump several times to handle construction activities upstream. The proposed cost for this work is $1.146.32. In our opinion, these items are justified. and the proposed costs are reasonable. Therefore. we recommend approval of this change order request in the amount of $5, 119.43. If you have any questions. pJease feej free to caU me at 376..7330. . Page 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN - SEPT AGE RECEMNG FACIUTY I Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Subtotal Item Quantity Units Unit Cost CO$t Cost 1 MobilizationlDem obiJizatlon( SO~ ) $1,221 $1,221 2 SITEWORK SITE CLEARING 1 lS 1500 $1,500 811 PVC DRAIN 140 LF 28 $3,920 CONNECT TO EXJST1NG DRAJNLJNE AT FILTERS 1 LS 3500 $3,500 48~ MANHOLE AT EXI5nNG DRAIN AND CONNECTIONS 1 LS 2200 $2,200 1 U WATER SERVlCE LINE 85 LF 12 $1.020 1"WATER SERVICE CONNECTION 1 EA 500 $500 1 U YARD HYDRANT 1 EA. 150 $150 SITE SURFACING 1 LS 2500 $2,500 $15,290 3 SEPTAGE RECEIVING FACILITY SITE EX CAVA nON AND BACKFilL 1 LS 3500 $3,500 WAlLS 5 Cy 4DO $21127 BASE SlAB 5 CY 350 $1,740 SUMP 1 Cy 400 $563 Mise. Metals and Grating 1 EA 1200 $1 ,200 $9,130 Oth9r : BONDING AND INSURANCE 2.5010 $641 Constn..u::tion Contingency 10.0oA> $2,564 . . Memo To: Mayor Corrie From: Brad Watson, P ~E. CC: File. Gary Smith, PE Date: 12/01/00 ~ 4l. V"\. b q"..... ::; Re: .:h:tIy-5 City Council Meeting - Request for Items on Consent Agenda I am requesting 'the following three items be placed on the City Council meeting agenda for their ronsideration at 1I1e December 5 meeting. Both items involve the WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension Project which involves tying the 36" diameter sewer trunk from the north into the existing headworks and modifications to the headworks itsetf. 1) VWVTP Trunk Sewer Extension - Chanae Order No.1. Change Order NO.1 is requested from JC Constructors for four separate things. A memo from JUS Engineers to me descnbing the changes is attached. Approval of this Change Order would increase the total contract amount to $66,879.43. The Public Works Department recommends fhat City Council approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $5,119.43. 2) WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension - Chanae Order NO.2. Change Order No. 2 is the addition of construction of a septage receiving station to the contract in the not to exceed amount of $32,000. A detailed construction cost estimate compiled by JUS Engineers is attached. The existing septage receiving facility had to be demolished to allow installation of the new trunk. We intened to include the septage facility in the initial contract but the schedule of the Bews' mini-storage project did not allow us to get it designed in time for the bid. The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve ChangeiOrder No. . 2 in the not-to-exceed amount of $32,000.00. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional infonnation. Thank you. Bra~~ from the desk ot.. · Page 1 Bnd WUSOII. P L A3si:stant Cicy Engineer Meridian Public Works Dcp.1nment 200 E.. Carlton St. Suite 100 ~ Idaho 83642...2600 (208) 887-22] 1 Fax; (20B) 887-J2'n W81Sont@ci.maXlia.n..id.ll"l ** TnTOI Da~c ~~ ~,~ I . ~.:::,/ tJ "'+ City of Meridian Public Works Dept. 6I0,iV"Yt17pf \d -6---DO .. . l-krr\ No," I b~,g-3 . Fz..:(Y!Y"M Memo To: Mayor Collie From: Brad Watson, P .E. CC: File. Gary Smith, PE Date: 12/01/00 Re: July 5 City Council Meeting - Request for Items on Consent Agenda I am requesting the following three items be placed on the City Council meeting agenda for their consideration at the December 5 meeting. Both items involve the WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension Project which involves tying the 36" diameter sewer trunk from the north into the existing headworks and modifications to the headworks itself. 1) WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension - Change Order No.1. Change Order No. 1 is requested from JC Constructors for four sepaJate things. A memo from JU8 Engineels to me describing the changes is attached. Approval of this Change Older would increase the total contract amount to $66,879.43. The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Change Order No.1 in the amount of $5,119.43_ 2) VWVTP T fUnk Sewer Extension - Change Order NO.2. Change Order NO.2 is the addition of construction of a septage receiving station to the contract in the not to exceed amount of $32,000. A detailed construction cost estimate compiled by JUS Engineers is attached. The existing septage receiving facility had to be demolished to allow installation of the new trunk. We intened to include the septage facility in the initial contract but the schedule of the Sews' mini-storage project did not allow us to get it designed in time for the bid. The Public Works Department reconvnends tbat City Council approve Change Order No. 2 in the not-to-exceed amount of $32,000.00. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional infonnation. Thank you, Bra~~ From tb.edesk oC.. . Page 1 8nId Watsoa. P ..E. A~CiCy Enginea Mr:riclian Public Woo::s Ocpartmerd 200 E. Carlton St. Suite 100 Maidian, Idaho 83642-2600 (208) 887-2211 Pax: (208) 887.. 1291 'MItsanb@ci.mc:ridion.id.us r.t:.J...J/t:.JC-f ~""3iJ.B __ ----------- ..J..U-8 ENGINEERS, Inc. Memo '~'.", :.:::; '."1 '. ' , '", :. To: NOV 2 7 2000 Brad Watson, P.E. Meridian Public Works Deparbnent From: Phillip H, Krichbaum, P.E. -f ~ CC: File 11624-06 Date: 11/22100 Re: WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension - Change Order Request, J.G. Constructors, Inc. Brad, J.C. Constructors has submitted a change order request. I have revieWed the request, and offer the following comments. .....life:,.: I ~:: '( .-',...... ::l. 1. Item No.1 - The bid quantity for the 3S-inch trunk sewer was listed at 116 lineal feet. Thfs quantity did not include the amount of pipe between the junction box and the headworks, which comprised an additional six (6) feet. The bid unit price of $110 per foot was used to obtain the requested amount of $660.00.. 2. Item No.2 - Native excavated materials contained a significant amount of soils which were deemed unsuitable for use as structural backfill. Approximately 180 CY of material was required, which should be verified with your resident project representative. The bid unit price of $15/CY was used to obtain the requested amount of $ 2,700. 3. Item No.3 - The construction plans did not show waterstop on the structure walls. and therefore. was not included in the Contractor's Bid. As discussed in the preconstruction meeting, we requested that the Contactor install the waterstop. The requested amount for this work is $ 613, 11 4. Item No.4 - Connecting to the existing 3S-inch trunk sewer involved some unanticipated work. Specifically, the existing trunk sewer, currently under construction through private development, contained a significant amount of water. The Contractor had to rent a large capacity S-lnch dewatering pump several times to handle construction activities upstream. The proposed cost for this work is $1,146.32. In our opinion, these items are justified, and the proposed costs are reasonable. Therefore. we recommend approval of this change order request in the amount of $5, 119.43. If you have any questions, pJease fee' free to caU me at 376-7330.. . Page 1 ( CITY OF MERIDIAN.. SEPTAGE RECEMNG FACIUTY I Preliminary Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Subtotal Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost Cost 1 Mobili2ationlDem obilizatlon(SO",,) $1,221 $1,221 2 SITEWORK SITe CLEARING 1 lS 1500 $1,500 8" PVC DRAIN 140 LF 28 $3,920 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAJNLINE AT FILTERS 1 LS 3500 $3,500 48" MANHOlE AT EXISTING DRAIN AND CONNEC"nONS 1 LS 2200 $21200 1" WATER SERVICE LINE as LF 12 $1 ,020 1"WATER SERVICE CONNECTION 1 EA 500 $SOQ 1U YARD HYDRANT 1 EA 150 $150 SITE SURFACING 1 lS 2500 $2,500 $15.290 3 SEPTAGE RECEIVING FAClLrrv SITE exCAVATION AND BACKFill 1 LS 3500 $3,500 WALLS 5 Cy 400 $2.127 BASE SlAB 5 CY 350 $1,740 SUMP 1 Cy 400 $563 Mise. Metals and Grating 1 EA 1200 $1 J200 $9,130 Other: BONDING AND INSURANCE 2.5% $641 Construction Contingency 10.0% $2,564 I ~~ TnTOI PO~~ ~A ~~ l . ~c."" ~.::.. Memo To: Mayor Corrie From: Brad Watson. P.E. CC: File, Gary Smith, PE Date: 12101/00 ~ Dee. ~ 'VlIl\. b <l. --- ~ Re: .:ftIIy-5 City Council Meeting - Request for Items on Consent Agenda I am requesting 1he foDowing 1hree items be placed on the City Council meeting agenda for their oonsideration at the December 5 meeting. 80th items involve the WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension Project which involves tying the 36" diameter sewer trunk from the north into the existing heactwor1<s and modifICations to the headworks itself. 1) WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension - Chanoe Order No.1. Change Ortler No.1 is requested from JC Constructors for four separate things. A memo from JUS Engineers to me describing the changes is attached. Approval of this Change Order would increase the total contract amount to $66,879..43. The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Change Order No.1 in the amount of $5,119.43. 2) WWTP Trunk Sewer Extension - ChanQe Order NO.2. Change Order No. 2 is the addition of construction of a septage receiving station to the contrad in the not to exceed amount of $32.000. A detailed COnstruction cost estimate compiled by JUS Engineers is attached. The existing septage receiving facility had to be demolished to allow installation of the new trunk. We intened to include the septage facility in the initial contract but the schedule of the Bews' mini-storage project did not allow us to get it designed in time for the bid. The Public Works Department recommends that City Council approve Change Order No.. 2 in the not-to-exceed amount of $32,000.00. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional infonnation. Thank you, Braft~ from the desk o( .. · Page 1 Brad WaISOJI. P L Assistant City Engineer Maictian Public Works DcparoneI\1 200 E. CmitoD St.. Sui1e J 00 Meridian, Idaho 83642...2600 (20R)8~-2211 Fax: (208)881-1297 \Wlsont@ci.muiiian.id.us ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** QU-B} ~ J~U-B ENGINEERS Memo To: Brad Watson, P.E. Meridian Public Works Department From: Phillip H. Krichbaum, P.E. f ~ CC: Date: 6/30/00 Re: Bidding Result Summary - Ustick Road Waterline Extension Bradr As you know, there were seven (7) bids received on the above project. and were opened and publicly read on June 29, 2000, at 3:00 pm. We have reviewed the bids, and aU appear responsive. There were several minor mathematical errors on the Bid Schedulel however, these errors did not affect the apparent low Bidder, Lurre Construction, of Caldwell, rdaho, as shown in the below summary. Lurre Construction 5220,559.85 OWyhE tt''l'") f"\ Q. 7 ~ on Bitteroot Construction 5229,815.60 MASC 1-/<;.AJD Paul Construction 5236.093.00 K&L McKay Construction S257,685.60 ~ngir I I trench Ifor these In reviewing Lurre Construction's b;dr the unit prices f backfill material appear higher than other bids, and wt materials. Use of these materials will need to managed during construclIve I. If requested, we can further review the Bidder's qualifications, and status of the public contracting license standing, etc... if you feel prudent prior to award, or make contingent to award. All agency construction approvals have been secured for the project. We should have the one (1) permanent easement signed by the property owner ( WH Moore) next week. We have coordinated with the NE firm on the proposed building, Scofield and Associates on the status of the project as well. If you have any questions please give me a call. . Page 1 }1_r"J 30 '00 : 'Z: 20 208 323 9336 PAGE.0l r I' \ i PLANNING ISSUE NO.4 PROJECT PRIORITIES Back1!:round: One of the end products of the Action Plan is the development of a capital improvement program (CIP). The CIP establishes priorities and allocates resources to implement the listed projects. Because the City is growing so rapidly, we expect that one of the high priorities will be to acquire land while it is still available. However, there is always the argument that projects should also be built to demonstrate tax money at work. We also know there is interest to build an indoor facility in Meridian. Since it will more than likely cost in the neighborhood of $20 million to develop all of the facilities recommended in the Plan, the City must budget its resources and fund over time. The issue then becomes one of how much can the City afford at one time and what are the projects of highest priority? Issue: What projects should have the highest priority? If given one dollar ($1.00), how would you distribute it among the following items. Remember it must add up to one dollar. Also list reasons for each choice. Henl AtTIount Reason(s) 1. Preservation of Open Space $ 2. Acquisition of Park Land $ 3. Development of small N. Park sites $ 4. Development of large C. Park sites 5. Development of Trails $ 6. Development of Indoor Recreation Center $ 7. Development of Indoor Pool $ 8. Beautification Projects $ 9. Development of Sports Fields $ 10. Other $ $1.00 / PLANNING ISSUE NO.4 PROJECT PRIORITIES Baclm:round: One of the end products of the Action Plan is the development of a capital improvement program (CIP). The CIP establishes priorities and allocates resources to implement the listed projects. Because the City is growing so rapidly, we expect that one of the high priorities will be to acquire land while it is still available. However, there is always the argument that projects should also be built to demonstrate tax money at work. We also know there is interest to build an indoor facility in Meridian. Since it will more than likely cost in the neighborhood of $20 million to develop all of the facilities recommended in the Plan, the City must budget its resources and fund over time. The issue then becomes one of how much can the City afford at one time and what are the projects of highest priority? Issue: What projects should have the highest priority? If given one dollar ($1.00), how would you distribute it among the following items. Remember it must add up to one dollar. Also list reasons for each choice. henl An10unt Reason(s) 1. Preservation of Open Space $ 2. Acquisition of Park Land $ 3. Development of small N. Park sites $ 4. Development of large C. Park sites 5. Development of Trails $ 6. Development of Indoor Recreation Center $ 7. Development of Indoor Pool $ 8. Beautification Projects $ 9. Development of Sports Fields $ 10. Other $ $1.00 (-~'- . November 30, 2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING ( Department Reports December 51 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith ITEM NO. 12-B-4 REQUEST Cooperative Agreement between Idaho Transportation Department and the City of Meridian and ACHD AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY A TIORNEY .- I\.-fLe cis /-a I-e view- CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached oJ ~ ~ lrOVl e . s0lf .0 l V v (u q/ ffJ 0'/ I / .f? ~ J . d~rr 011/ J\ Yv-' 'flA \ ~ ~J · ~v0 J) It1\ ov~ {1J V" ~ \I I C l 0 S L () Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shoD become property of the City of Meridian. COOPERA. TIVE AGREEMENT IM-STP-84-1 (047)45 LOCUST GROVE GRADE SEPARATION ADA COUNTY KEY NO. 8048 PARTIES This Agreement is made and entered into on the day of 2000, by and between the IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, hereafter called ITD, the CITY OF MERIDIAN, hereafter called the CITY, and the ADA COUNTY lliGHWAY DISTRICT, hereafter called the DISTRICT. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to set out the responsibilities of the parties in the _ design, construction and maintenance of the Locust Grove Grade Separation project. Authority for this Agreement is established by Section 40-317 of the Idaho Code. The Parties agree as follows: SECTION I. That the ITD will: 1. Not guarantee that the Federal funds for this project are available or will be made available. If the funds are unavailable, this agreement is void. 2. Review and approve the plans and specifications for construction of the project. 3. Provide a maximum of Two Million Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,700,000.00) from Interstate Maintenance funds towards construction of the overpass structure. These funds will be provided in the year that ITD programs the project for construction. No additional funds will be paid by ITD for this project. 4. Advertise, open bids, prepare a contract estimate of cost based on the successful low bid. ITD will award a contract for construction of the project, based on the successful low bid, if it does not exceed ITD'S estimate of cost of construction by more than ten (10) percent. 5. Provide to the DISTRICT sufficient copies of the Contract Proposal, Notice to Contractors, and approved construction plans. ~ 6. Authorize the DISTRICT to administer the project and make any necessary changes and decisions within the general scope of the plans and specifications. Prior approval of the ITD will be obtained ifit is necessary, during the life of the construction contract, to deviate from the plans and specifications to such a degree that the costs will be increased or the nature of the completed work will be significantly changed. 7. Perform a final inspection of the work, and issue final acceptance of the project. 8. IndemnifY., save harmless and defend regardless of outcome the CITY and the DISTRICT from the expenses of and against suits, actions, claims or losses of every kind, nature and description, including costs, expenses and attorney fees that may be incurred by reason of any act or omission, neglect or misconduct of the STATE in the performance of the work which is the subject of this Agreement. SECTION II. That the CITY will: 1. Pay to the DISTRICT on or before October 1, 2001, the amount of One Million Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,800,000.00), to be used for purchase of right-of-way for the project. This is the total amount to be paid by the CITY on this project. 2. Indemnify, save harmless and defend regardless of outcome the ITD and the DISTRICT from expenses of and against suites, actions, claims or losses of every kind, nature and description, including costs, expenses and attorney fees that may be incurred by reason of any act or omission, neglect or misconduct of the CITY in the work which is the subject of this Agreement SECTION III. That the DISTRICT will: 1. Negotiate with and hire a consultant to perform the preliminary engineering for the proje~t. This shall include environmental clearance and permits, and right-of- way drawings and documentation. Securing the services of a consultant for this work must follow the process outlined in the Idaho Transportation Department Guidelines for Local Public Agency Projects. 2. Act as agreement administrator for the consultant agreement. 3. Provide all funds for the design and construction of the project, except as otherwise provided for in Sections I and II above. Such funds shall be credited towards the DISTRICT's match on the project. I ., -........-.- -..... ....-........ ~ ..... ......~-_.~.......--.,...- - ............--........-.....~--,-........-.--..............- ~_.:-:: .......-...-......--.-....--:-.- -I"r-'~ - ...........................~ _......_ ..... ~ I ( \, Coordinate with the Local Highvvay Technical Assistance Council to obtain $2,000,000.00 in STP-Urban funds currently programmed in preliminary development. 4. 5. Designate a resident engineer and other personnel, as is deemed necessary, to supervise and inspect construction in accordance with the plans, specifications and estimates in the manner required by applicable state and federal regulations. This engineer, or his authorized representatives, will prepare all montWy and final contract estimates and change orders, and submit all change orders to the ITD for its concurrence. 6. Maintain complete accounts of all project funds received and disbursed, which accounting will determine the final project costs. 7. Maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred on the project, and make such materials available during the Agreement period, and for three years from the date of the final payment under the Agreement, for inspection by the ITD, Federal Highway Administration, or any other authorized representative of the Federal goveniment. Copies thereof will be furnished if requested 8. Except for the overpass structure which is to be maintained by the ITD, the DISTRICT shall maintain the project upon completion to the satisfaction of the lTD. Such maintenance includes, but is not limited to, preservation of the entire roadway surface, shoulders, roadside cut and fill slopes, drainage structures, and such traffic control devices as are necessary for its safe and efficient utilization. Failure to maintain the project in a satisfactory manner will jeopardize the future allotment of federal-aid highway funds for projects within the DISTRICT'S jurisdiction. 9. Indemnify, save harmless and defepd regardless of outcome the ITD and the CITY from expenses of and against suites, actions, claims or losses of every kind, nature and description, including costs, expenses and attorney fees that may be incurred by reason of any act or omission, neglect or misconduct of the DISTRICT in the work which is the subject of this Agreement. SECTION IV. Both parties agree that: 1. This Agreement shall become effective on the first date mentioned above and shall remain in full force and affect until amended or replaced upon the mutual consent of the ITD, the CITY, and the DISTRICT. ~ EXECUTION This Agreement is executed for the ITD by its Assistant Chief Engineer (Development); executed for the DISTRICT by the President, attested to by the Director, with the imprinted Corporate Seal of the ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, and executed for the CITY by the Mayor, attested to by the City Clerk, with the imprinted Corporate Seal of the CITY OF lVIERIDIAN. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: Assistant Chief Engineer (Development) APPROVED: RECOMMENDED BY: District Engineer ATTEST: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Director President (SEAL) By regular/special meeting on ATTEST: CITY OF MERIDIAN . . . .. ,. .. . . ... . . . . . . , .. . .. . . . .. . . ... ... . .. l , . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . Mayor City Clerk .. .. II . . .. . .. .. " . . . .. . . ... .. " . " (SEAL ) By regular/special meeting on hm:8048 coop.doc ~ / I, RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Idaho Transportation Department, hereafter called the STATE, has submitted an Agreement stating obligations of the STATE and the CITY OF MERIDIAN, hereafter called the CITY, for design and construction of Locust Grove Grade Separation; and WHEREAS, the STATE is responsible for obtaining compliance with laws, standards and procedural policies in the development, construction and maintenance of improvements made to the Federal-aid Highway System when there is federal participation in the costs; and WHEREAS, certain functions to be performed by the STATE involve the expenditure of funds as set forth in the Agreement; and WHEREAS, The STATE can only pay for work associated with the State Highway system; and WHEREAS, the CITY is fully responsible for its share of project costs; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED: 1. That the Agreement for Federal Aid Highway Project IM-STP-84-1(047)45 is hereby approved. 2. That the Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the CITY. 3 · That duly certified copies of the Resolution shall be furnished to the Idaho Transportation Department. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of a Resolution passed at a regular, duly called special (X-out non-applicable term) meeting of the City Council, City of Meridian, held on , 2000. (Seal) City Clerk ib- ( November 30, 2000 Department Reports MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 5, 2000 APPLICANT City Clerk... Will Berg ITEM NO. 12-C-l REQUEST Request by Jeff Manship to discuss Tremont Place Subdivision Development Agreement AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CiTY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVIce COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: ~~~ J~/ j ~(\'C~ 0. ~LV yttttJ lJvl'V tL ~ . l^llll rO~~ (}p vv ~ c l (/ frv Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at pubnc meetings shaH become property of the City of Meridian. PI ACLR Engineers, ,Inc. TO:' Will Berg, City- Clerk_ C/O Mayor Corrie and City Council Members 33 East Idaho Ave Meridian, ID 83642 RECEIVED N 0 V 3 0 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE: November 29,2000 RE: Tremont Place Subdivision Mr. Berg, On behalf of Mike Homan, I am writing, to reque~t a change to the D~velopment Agreement for Tremont Place Subdivision. I wquld like the opportunity to be heard at the December 5, 2000 City Council meeting. The Development Agreement that was adopted originally planned for the completion of construction to be done in one phase. We would still like to record the plat as a whole. Our goal is to amend the agreement, and to split this project into 2 construction phases. The p~ose of this request is due to the winter conditions that have a negative effect upon the completion of the -constructiQn process. Our intent is to complete the project in the springtime or soon as possible, . _ ~eather permitting. If the granting of this request passes, the first construction phase would include all lots north of the Nine- Mile Drain. This portion would be completed and recorded so building permits could be jssued. The lots south of the Nine Mile Drain would be the 2nd construction phase. The request that we are asking for would have no effect on the city infrastructure. It is only because of the winter conditions that will delay the construction process in the up coming months. Pleas~ 'consider this request of construction phasing to be heard at the December 5, 2000 City Coun~il hearing. If you have any questions or cominents regarding this matter, please call me at (208) 887-7760. Sincerely, , ~/#(~ Jeffrey L.- Manship Land Use Planner cc: File# 98870 . ,12552 W. EXECUTNE DRIVE, SUITE B · BO~SE, IDAHO 83713 · (208) -887-7760 · FAX (208) 887-778L MERIDIAN r~0; . - .. :1 \&/~ "'{)O .. (~i~wt--. g~~ CnY\unJ~.~~. . - - j ..\In -1 1 ~ce ~rk 888-4218 Memo To: Mayor and Council From: Shelby CC: Date: 12/5/00 Re: Beer, Wine and/or Liquor Renewals Enclosed is a copy of the list of Beer, Wine and Liquor Renewals with Chief Gordon's approval as of today. . Page 1 ~ '-' :; a a Q g [ :r ~ ~ () n j ~ ~ ~ 0 a- g 3- ,. i l ';lIICI ~ [ ~ ::I: < 0 ~ !l 0 g ~- g ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ c ~ 0 a () ~ 0- VI .,.- .,.- .. Q ~ [ [ [ [ [ C ". i 3' z c 0 tr . "i z Z Q i ~ Qi a. [ co 9 P ; m ~ z z z z ~ ~ .. p p P 9 l ~ .. <.n (..J "oJ ::: - 0-. ("n .... (D :J: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ n ;:Q f t f ! ... ~ ~ ~ ;: ~ ~ C 0'1 . 0- - 0 t j ... Q ~ ~ Q. i'" GO "'" i i &. ~ ::r ~ CD c>> ~ 0- ~ g; ~ ~ i 0- . ~ ~ ~ '< VI ........ ~ 8 > .. ~ :::::J: ! J Q ......, ~ ~ c to..) .?D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9: g{ :3l ~ <.I\' I'\..l , 0 ; ~ Q ....... ~ ~ 0 c ~ 0 a ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ :::: g ~ ~ " ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ... z '" r- CD ~ ...0 !'.;) i ~ ~ ::r a :" n 3 ~ ~ p f f VI 0 3 CD -.0 C ...... 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 J' ~ ~ ~ i tD ~ ()) ~ ......, i 6 ca Q) $ ~ ? ~ ~ :!: ~ ~ ~ [ ~ UJ ! I ! ::s ~ z a r- . ...0 ~ ...... t; ! ::I tD 0.. 8 .... ...... i' ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ .:0 a.. 0' co "0 A (..) ex; f , g ~ :-c rr- - >< VI & & c.n g c.w ...0 i: i: t: J:Io. 0.. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. ~ ""tt (..J to) ~ (..) ~ I ... ~ W "'0 ~ ...... (..) ..... .." "'t:I -0 ..... ""D ~ t-.J ~ 2) ""t:I .." -. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " 0 ~ '<) ...... 0 0 0 ~ 0 ii 0 0 ~ 0.. ~ 0.. ::s <.n eD A- m fT'I CD' rn Ut en rn en 0- eD CD CCI OJ ~ ;Z tJI CD CD ~ ~ w ~ n () ~ ~ g 0 Q ..... en ~ r- ..... . ..... ~ <:i n !S !8 Po.) ~ fit,.) ""'tl Q Q: <D .It.. ~ ~ ~ tD :;, ~ p ~ ~ < .,. c ~ CD f,oI't ~ 3 ~ " a' ~ 0.- ~ d ! 3 i !.II :--- < ~ ~ 7 a: a: Qa ~ 3 3 3 ~ 3 c ~ ~ ;: f i' a ~ :J 2- ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ! a 8- .." ~ f ~ ~ ~ s: ~ ~ 0 ." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C > :s n. !l ! ~ Q < ~ > !!. ? B- 0 9t a < '" 9: '" ! ~ Q St > lS ~ SD ~ CD Q) e a. = $D P. Q. Q. Q. ft ft r- 2- ! < !' ~ at (.0) Q .. a po So ? > :3 0 ft < 0 < ..... ...... ;j ? ~ ::J z ? P P P P P < a. c a. ;J ? ~ ~ B e ? ~ P. ...., tit G ~ ~ 0 a: (Ii r- C co ~ ~ ...g 0.. 0- ~ M !l ffi ::::J 0 ? ~ ;: ~ ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ 9- Q C. ~ ~ Q) co ~ ~ ~ '" ::J ~ 0 ~ a. ~ t.) (.,J ~ 1 "0 ~ ..... ~ ~ ::J a. 0.. 0... to.) ~ ~ ~ }o,.) Q .... . .It.. A- A- Q, ....... ~ Q a. 0 g :3 tv p.,,) ...., Jro.) It..,) VI It..,) C ::J 0 . :3 r- ::J }o,.) ::::J (.h - ....... .c c - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - ........ --. - - .:::: ........ - - - - ("It . C ........ ::: ....... -.. ::: ....... ....... :::: -::: ~ ....... ....... ::: -.. ....... :::: ::: ....... -. ....... :::: ........ ::: CI =: ....... W c:; a ::0 ~ UJ W ~ U) w UJ w C,a) w UJ w UJ w w w w w w Wi ~ W ~ W ~ W ~ !t 0 CN -- -- ....... ....... ....... ....... ........ ........ ....... ....... 8 ....... ...... ....... 8 ........ ....... -.. ........ ........ ........ ...... ........ (l) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 < -I Sr - - - - - - - 9.. - - - - :III CJ .:::: - , , , .:::: .:::: .:::: .:::: .:::: .:::: n a r- a. 0 a. .- ~ '" ~ tv ~ tv ~ ~ tv ~ ~ to..) -- ~ tV -..0 "0 "I '() n ~ CD ./..~~ f,):' 3 i ........ [ '\'\'\ '\ '\ \ ~ tD 0 ~ 0 '\ 8 - . :1 rfi :" ..,. . ~..-, !~, tD '\'\'\\\ '\ '\ '\ '\'\ i' ~ii#i '\ ~r I ~ ~ : ~JE; tD ::J _ -,.co '\ tD '\'\'\'\'\ '\ \'\ '\ '\ '\'\ ~ C - en '\ '\ \ I ~ 0 0 ..... ..... l'V tv tv tv t-.) t..) ....... 8 8 8 ....... tv ...... tV tv (II 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. 0\ 0- Ul 0- U'l ~ 0 to..) 0 tv 0 tv 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 v, 8 ~ 8 8 0 ~ () () () (") () () () () () () n () () @ ~ ~ ~ [3 ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ tv I'\..l tv t.,) t-.) tv tv t?;:1 .a:... ~ <n 0.- ~ 0.. 0.. 0.- ...... <.n ~ 0.. ....... ......., 0.. c..n ....... - 0 ()) 1'0.) '\'\ '\\'\\\ '\'\'\\ '\ 0 '\'\ '\'\'\\'\ '\\ '\ \ trj J--( ~ < l?;t r-~~' :::0 ~ ii '--r-,. --. - r-- ) - -....... ~ ['--..... <:::: :::>c ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - ,~ f"'...,: ~ CO"............ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~- ~- ~~ ~~ ~~ " " ~~ ~~~ ~ '--) "'" ~ ~----- ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~- ro...-......~ r~~--" '-~ \ \ '"----b ~) ~ ~ o o ""'" ~~ ,,~------- ,,' " "" ---- [j i ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! f [ ~ ~. ~ 0 f g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i Q i ~ ! [ & ~ ~ ~ [ ~g:~~~I~!O~[ ~ ~ ~ 3 ; , i~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q . ~ ~ f l:1 g p ~ ~ o !I~i~ ~ i i .~ ! H ~ ~ -: : i I ~ i i 8 ~ ~ ~ t .. i ;; ; c;; o (3 ~ ~ [ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ l ~ ~ i J t ! f ! : e ~ '" ~ n < ~ ~ fj! k k J ~ El ~~i ~~ Q; 9: C- o a a ~:J ::J g- 5 I.- :: 0 g r- :J :J ~ Cl :J ~ i i ~ ~ ~ !'-) t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .b. co ""a " ~ ~ o to.,) t.J tJ:lI rn ... to) ..". rn ~ ~ ~ - ~ x - 1:2 ! ~ ~ ~ ~ 0- ~ !l ; ~ ~ ~ t -0 ~ :J ;:... > ~ ~ ........ a. a. (5 Q Q 01 j ~ = = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w w w w w w w w w w 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 - - ~ ~ \ \ <.1'1 t<-.) 8 g; 8 8 () (') ~ ~ en 01 c.n 0.. \\ \\ \ \ - - ~ to..) to.) \ \ \ Z G ~ a.. a 0.. g;~ o' ::1 !a. ~ ~ \\ ~ 8 () ~ to..) ..... <oQ ...... ~ 0.. Qo. '" t<o.J ~ g; () () @ ~ I',,) to..) 0.. .ar.. '-0 Q) \ \ .. Z 5 ~ f ,. ... .. ." Z ::r a o :3 i . Z a ~ 8. ~ ~ 8: & ! ~ .. - - ....... J-.) CD - - \ \ () --{ -< o T1 $: m :::0 o )> mZ '" CD CD ... ..... :e -- ::s CD C ~ C. - -. .c c o ... r- -. n CD J en CD ::::a CD :J CD ~ C - fA . ~ o o ~ c rn n c::) U1 "" CJ c:::;) C) ~ t?:j o t?:j 1--1 <::: t?:j tj \\ I ayor ROBERT D. CORRlE (- Hl./B OF TREASURE VALLEY r\ Good Place to Li ve ( ~ITY OF MERIDIAN LEGAL DEPA.RT~I ENT C::O~) :S8~2-+99 · F~x 2~S-2S0 1 Ci (y Cuu [lei! :Vkmbt:rs CHARLES ROUNTREE GLENN BENTLEY RON ANDERSON KEITH B [RD 33 EA.ST IDAHO wIERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4-k33 · Fo.x (208) 887 -48l3 City Clerk Fax (208) 888-42l8 PUBLIC \VORKS BUILOlNG DEPA.RTLvlENT (208) SS7.2211 · Fax 887-1297 PLANNING AND ZONING o EPARTivlENT (~08) 334-5533 · F~z 887- 1297 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET FAX NUMBER: :j 7 7 ~ [; 301 '- ~ GVr1A '-~ I-f-; I ~11- DA TE: / '): ( ;) - 00 TO: TITLE/DEPARTMENT: CONFIDENTIAL: YES NO TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 FROM: CITY OF MERIDIAN FAX NUMBER: (208) 888-4218 NAME: JLris~U~=-V TITLE/DEPARTMENT: C~ lJ.en~ ~, 1 /\. , " COMMENTS: ,j~u .- ~. CI ~~ rrr-J.1 }'\t)A1 C-L Ju<;-r U1 CA~~ ~ .~ ~ 0JLfl/P PLEASE CALL US IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL FAX TRANSACTIONS SUCCESSFULLY (208) 888-4433. (- NOTICE AND PUBLISHED SUM.MARY ORDINANCE PURSUAN11 TO I.C~ 9 50-901 (A) CI'.f'{ OF MERlDIAN ORDINANCE NO~ 898 PROVIDING FOR A lANDSCAPE ORDINANCE An ordinance of the City of Meridian amending the following sections: 11-12-3 g. 1., 11-12-3 l. 2., 11-12-3 n. 4. to eliminate landscaping; and at 11-13-1 g. to eliminate the submission ofa parkingllandscaping plan, I 1-13-4 b. 3. to eliminate screening and landscaping of parking areas; 12.4.2 e. 2. to eliminate sight triangles; 12-4.7 a. to eliminate planting strip buffers between land uses; and at 11-13-4 b.l, 11-13-4 b.2, and 12-6-7 to add references to the new landscaping ordinance; and at J 2-4-3 to allow the pedestrian easement to fifteen feet wide and at 12-4-10 to add an additional paragraph pertaining to mkropaths regulations; and at 12-5-2 k. to allow the ea.sements to be at least fifteen feet; and at 12-6-8 b. 1 to add the language that the buffering shaH be as provided by the new landscape ordinance, and creating a new Chapt.er 13 of Title 12 to be known as lan<i'lc.aping, covering the following topics: General Provisions-Intent and Purposes, Background, Benefits, Costs to Developers and Property Owners, Definitions, Landscape Plan, Minimum Design Standards & Installation, Irrigation, Sight Triangles, Street Buffers, Parking Lots, Buffers Between Different Land Uses, Tree PreseIVation, Stormwater Integration, Micropath Landscaping, ReSidential Subdivision Open Space, Landscape Maintenance, Altemative Compliance, Certificate of Occupancy; and to provide an effective date. A full te.."Ct of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Id 0, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall become effective on the fg~ day of ceYh.. ~ ,2000. d1~~~~r C; .. City of Meridian Mayor and City Council By: William G. Berg, Jr., City Clerk :? i; SE.t'\L -:; -~ &> g :: -'to ~ ...C5 0 ~ ~ ~("; -, .,....... ~ "A, }:lr lSi ~- X' ?~' ~..-:.v;f~ ' ~ ~.....,. ,.~ C'O ~ ,..... , ,/ / t E-), r1;-,r \ ' , /..-:-, V/l 'It) ';:a t \ ,\ III;iA'_ ,- -:'_n\\\\ z:\ W ork\M\Mcrid Ian\Merid Ian 15360 M\Onl U ld 1\(:('8 Ci I Y II :111\2 000 Om i n~ nccs\Sumlandsca peOnJS9 5 .duc DEe 12 '00 11:02 1 ~VlR 4~h t1/1~C::: 01'"\"-''- /""':l-' , ( \ r' WHITE PETERSON t. WHITE, PETERSON, MORROW, GIORAY, ROSSMAN, NYE & ROSSMAN) P.A~ ATTORNEYS AT L^w J\Jl.IE KLEIN PI$('.Hl\R. WW. F. OIG"AY, III 8R lil>ff )OHNSOW D. S....M1J"El. JOllt-'SON 'WllUhW ^. MORROW WlUl^H P. NICHOLS. CtP-JSrOPHER S. NyU PUlL).. A. PETIR:roN ERIC S. ROSSMAN TOOD A. ROSS),MN D^VJP M. SWARTU:!Y TtAA.ENCE R. W'11.TR.. 104 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH POST OFFICF. ROX 247 NAMPAI IDAHO 8365.3..0247 TEL (208) 466..9272 fAX (208) 466.4405 MERIDlAN OFFICE 200 EAb'T CARLTON ^ VENUE SUITS) I POST O~flCE BOX 11 CjO MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83680-11 ~Q TEL (208) 28t:J- t499 PAX (20tH 188-2501 9..u:sO ADUln-EO iN OR nh1..S0 An"'ITT'EL> IN '4IA Decen1ber 12, 2000 PLE.A.C;~ RePLY TO NAMPA OFFICE William G. Berg, Jr. City of Meridi;jo 33 E. Idaho Meridiar), Idaho 83642 Re: Ordinance No. 898) Summary Publication 1 )ear Will: Pursuant to the direction of the Meridian City Council, this office has prepared a summarization of the ordinance providing for landscaping, pursuant to the City's action. I do hereby 3dvise the City, and make this statement, that. said summary is true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public of the provisions of said ordinance. . You are hereby directed to file this statement with the ordinance, pursnant to the provisions of Idaho Code ~ 50-901 (A)~ Wm. F. Nichols Enclosure L;\ W od<.\M\McriJiaIl\M<7idian I )160M\Ordjn~nccs CJ r.y HaJl\2000 Onlin:mn'~\. ~lImmaryOrdLtr.doc DEe 12 '00 11:02 1 "J~O AL'L' .<'1.-1nc:- ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE NO. 896 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS: 11-12-3 G. 1., 11-12-3 L. 2., 11-12-3 N. 4.TO ELIMINATE LANDSCAPING; AND AT 11-13-1 G. TO ELIMINATE THE SUBMISSION OF A PARIGNG/LANDSCAPING PLAN, 11-13-4 B. 3. TO ELIMINATE SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING OF PARIGNG AREAS; 12-4- 2 E. 2. TO EL~MINATE SIGHT TRIANGLES; 12-4-7 A. TO ELIMINATE PLANTING STRIP BUFFERS BETWEEN LAND USES; AND AT 11-13-4 B.l, 11-13-4 B.2, AND 12-6-7 TO ADD REFERENCES TO THE NEW LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE; AND AT 12-4-3 TO ALLOW THE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT TO FIFTEEN FEET WIDE AND AT 12-4-10 TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL PARAGRAPH PERTAINING TO MICROPATHS REGULATIONS; AND AT 12-5-2 !(. TO ALLOW THE EASEMENTS TO BE AT LEAST FIFTEEN FEET; AND AT 12-6-8 B. 1 TO ADD THE LANGUAGE THAT THE BUFFERING SHALL BE AS PROVIDED BY THE NEW LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE, AND CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 13 OF TITLE 12 TO BE ICNOWN AS LANDSCAPING; AND TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY: OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO: SECTION 1: That 11-12-3 G. I., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 11-12-3 G Drive-in restaurant: 1 :" Will be enclosed on the property line with landscaping and fencing, except for ingress and egress, to prevent trash from Inoving onto other properties; 2. Will have a six foot (6') high sight-obscuring fence alo11g the property lines that adjoin a residence; 3.: Will provide for adequate trash receptacles; and Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 1 4. Will avoid the direction of night lighting toward any residence. SECTION 2: That 11-12-3 L. 2., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 11-12-3 L Rifle and pistol range: I. Will be designed with a backstop, or designed to avoid a line of fire that is directed towards any residence or business within one mile; 2. 'A/ill incOIporate landscaping that is compatible "'""-,,ith the surrounding landscaping, and 3-.b Will provide supervision and security measures during periods of use. SECTION 3: That 11-12-3 N. 4., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 11-12-3 N W recldng yard: I. Will be completely enclosed by a solid six foot (6') high sight- obscuring fence; 2. Will not result in the storage of automobile, junk, or salvage material that is visible from a11Y public right of way; 3. Will not result in storage of automobiles that exceeds the height of the fence; and A 1 A '.IIl-. 1-. 1....1 · t.... .. 1-. 1-. -:r7 y y 1 ~la"'V-.:e SUC:a..l anuscaplri.g t~~at IS approprIate "'''''-V1.t~l t~~e surroul'lding area. SECTION 4: That 11-13-1 G, Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby repealed and re-Iettered to read as follows: 11-13-1 G GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: G:- Rcquired Submission Of Parking Sitc Plan. .l^J.I dC"'v-.:eloplTIent Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 2 applications shall include a site plan (dra\'""v1."l to a ITiinilUUlTl scale of one inch equals 50 feet) "'v'""v'"hich is fully'" dimelisioned alid sho"'vYv'"s any'" parldng or loading facilities to be prOvided in compliance "'v\ith this Title. Such site plan shall be sumitted to the Comrriission for appro"'y.al "'v"'v.hen the required off street parldng is more than six (6) parldng spaces and shall indicate ingress and egress to the area and traffic patterns ilL adjacent streets and allcyTs alid appropriate landscaping. H:G. Joint Parking Facilities: Off-street parldng facilities for different buildings, structures, uses, or for mixed uses may be provided collectively in any district in which separate parking facilities for each constituent use would be permitted; provided, that the total number of spaces so located together shall not be less than the sum of the separate requirements for each use. SECTION 5: That 11-13-4 B.3, Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby repealed and re-Iettered to read as follows: 11-13-4 B 3 Screening: ft. 'vVhene"'y"'er a commercial off street parldrig area is located in or adjacent to a residential district, it shall be cffecti"'y~ely screened Ofi. all sides "vTv.hich adjoin or face any property'" used for rcsidel1tial purposes by it ""'v'"all, fence, or planti11g screen that is not less thall four feet (4') ill height plus a planting strip of four feet (1') luinimulu "'v\idth or in an alternate arrangeITicnt as appro,,"'ed by the Conunission. fl-:-a. Suitable landscaping and ground cover shall be provided and maintained on a continuing basis within the planting strip. Planting screens or hedges shall not exceed two feet (2') in height where location is such that sight lines are necessary for vehicular movement across pedestrianways. e:-b. At least one tree of not less than three inches (3") diameter size class shall be provided for every one thousand five hundred ( 1 ,500) square feet of pavement area. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 3 SECTION 6: That 12-4-2 E. 2., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby repealed and renumbered and to read as follows: 12-4-2 E. 2. STREETS: ~ Sight Tianglcs. I\1inimum clear sight distance at all minor street intersections shall permit "'v"ehicles to be "'visible to the dri\t~er of another "'vx:hicle \YyThen each is OI..e hundred feet (1 DO') froIn the center of the intersection. 3-:-~ Number Of Streets: No more than two (2) streets shall cross at anyone intersection. 4:.L T Intersections: T intersections may be used wherever such design will not restrict the free movement of traffic; 5:-1. Center Line Offsets: Street center lines shall be offset by a distance of at least one hundred twenty five feet (125'); and 6.2.. Vertical Alignment Of Intersection: A nearly flat grade with appropriate drainage slopes is desirable within intersections. This flat section shall be extended a minimum of one hundred feet (100') each way from the intersection. An allowance of two percent (2%) maximum intersection grade in rolling terrain, and four percent (4%) in hilly terrain, will be permitted. SECTION 7: That 12-4-7 A., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby repealed to read as follows: 12-4-7 PU\NTINC STRIPS AND RESERVE STRIPS: Planting strips ftftfl reserve strips shall conform to the following: It- Planting Strips. Planting strips shall be required to be placed next to incompatible features such as high"'yYyTay"'s, railroads, comlTIercial or il..dustrial uses to screen the "'vie"'y"y" fron1 residential properties. Such screening shall be a minin-..um of t'"v'"yTenty" feet (20') "vide, and shall not be it part of the nOlTIial street right of \'"yTay or utility'" casement, and Landscape Ordinance - Fina111/28/00 Page 4 &A. Reserve Strips: 1. Private: Privately-held reserve strips controlling access from adjacent lands to streets shall be prohibited; however, 2. Public: A one foot (1 ') reserve may be required to be placed along half streets which are within the subdivision boundaries to ensure future dedication and construction of a full-width street, and such strip shall be deeded in fee simple to the City, County or highway district for future street widening. SECTION 8: That 11-13-4 B.1., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 11-13-4 B. 1. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be required for all off- street parldng areas for multi-family residential, commercial, industrial and technical developments. (Ord. , Landscape Ordinance, 12-19-2000) SECTION 9: That 11-13-4 B.2., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 11-13-4 B. 2. Underground sprinlding systems shall be required to maintain screening, planting strips, a,nd other landscaping, as per Section 8 of the Landscape Ordinance. SECTION 10: That 12-4-3, Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 12-4-3 PEDESTRIAN WALI<WAYS: Right of way for pedestrian walkways in the middle of long blocl(s may be required where necessary to obtain convenient pedestrian circulation to schools, parks or shopping areas; the pedestrian easement shall be at least ten feet (1 Of) fifteen feet (15') wide. SECTION II. That 12-4-10 I, Meridian City Code, be and the same is hereby amended to add a new paragraph to subsection I to read as follows: 12-4-10 I Maximum Fence Height In Each District: Subject to the other restrictions contained in this Section, the maximum fence heights in each zoning district shall be as follows: Landscape Ordinance - Fina111/28/00 Page 5 Zone Height 1. R-4, R-8, R-15, R-40 and L-O 6.0 feet 2. C-N, C-C, C-G and RSC, OT and MUR* 8.0 feet 3. TE, 1-L and M 8.0 feet Fences along micropaths are regulated by the Landscape Ordinance at 12-13-15-9. *Provided, however, in all cases in subsection 12 of this Section where a fence greater than six feet (6') is proposed, the applicant for the fence building permit shall submit the request for permit to the Planning and Zoning Commission for design review. SECTION 12: That 12-5-2.1(., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 15-5-2.1(. Sidewalks And Pedestrian Walkways: Five foot (5') sidewall(s shall be required on both sides of the street, except where the average width of lots, as measured at the street frontage line or at the building setback line, is over one hundred feet (100'), sidewalks on only one side of the street may be allowed. Pedestrian wall<ways, when required, shall have easements at least ten fect (1 0') fifteen feet (15') as per Section 15 of the Landscape Ordinance. Title 12. Chapter 13. in width and include a paved walle at least five feet (5') in width. Sidewalks and crosswalks shall be constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications as adopted by the Council. SECTION 13:' That 12-6-7 F., Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 12-6-7 F. Landscaping and as per the Landscape Ordinance. Chapter 13.: 1. Screening of off-street parl<.ing, loading, and waste storage areas shall be required. 2. Screening shall be required as a buffer between residential and nonresidential uses or structures in a PD. 3. All ground surfaces in a PD shall be covered with a vegetative Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 6 cover growth or other ground treatment capable of preventing soil erosion under normal surface runoff conditions. SECTION 14: That 12-6-8.B.1, Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 12-6-8.B.1. Commercial (PD-C): 1. Buffering And Screening: When commercial structures or uses in a PD-C abut a residential use, sight-restricting screening or buffering shall be provided as per Section 12 of the Landscape Ordinance, Title 12, Chapter 13. SECTION 15: That Title 12 of the Meridian City Code, be, and the same is hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW CHAPTER, to be lmown and designated as Chapter 13, Title 12, Meridian City Code, and to read as follows: CHAPTER 13 LANDSCAPING SECTION 12-13-1: SHORT TITLE: This chapter may be cited as "Landscaping Ordinance." SECTION 12-13-2: GENERAL PROVISIONS - INTENT AND PURPOSES: 12-13-1 INTENT AND PURPOSE: To promote landscaping in the City of Meridian that will improve community livability, preserve the quality of life, and enhance the aesthetic quality, economic viability, and environmental health of the city. 12-13-2 BACICGROUND: The City of Meridian is facing many problems as a result of the explosive growth of the previous decade. These problems include: a. Extensive parking lots that are unscreened and unshaded; b. Hot streets, buildings, and parldng lots which cause high energy consumption; c. Unscreened loading docks and outdoor storage areas; Landscape Ordinance - Fina111/28/00 Page 7 d. Air quality concerns; e. Unwanted noise; { f. Reflection and glare from the abundance of glass, metal, and plastic used in buildings, automobiles, and signs; and g. Wind/water erosion, which causes water pollution. 12-13-3 BENEFITS: There is abundant research available about the benefits of landscaping in communities. This is by no means an exhaustive summary, but following are some of the major benefits that our community would receive through a comprehensive landscape ordinance. Most people think of landscaping only in terms of aesthetic or beautification benefits, which certainly exist, but there are also proven economic and environmental benefits to the community as summarized below. 1. Aesthetic Benefits: a. Screened parldng lots, loading docks, trash receptacles, and storage areas; b.~ Reduced glare and reflected light; c. Shade for buildings, streets and parking lots; d. Defines outdoor spaces; e. Seasonal color, including flowers and fall color; f. Frames and reveals desired views; g. Adds natural elements to otherwise harsh urban development; h. Attracts birds and other urban wildlife; 1. Helps maintain the rural feel of the city; and J. Visually ties the city to the surrounding countryside. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 8 ( ( 2. Economic Benefits: a. More profitable business districts; b. Consumers report greater willingness to pay for products in well landscaped commercial areas; c. Attracts new businesses; d. Encourages redevelopment and economic investment in the local community; e. Office and retail space leases more quicldy; f. Reduces energy consumption for air conditioning, etc.; and g. Increased residential property values. 3 Environmental Benefits: a. Prevents soil erosion; b." Removes particulate pollutants from the air; c. Provides extra oxygen in the atmosphere; d. Removes carbon dioxide from the air; e. Improves soil condition; f. Purifies water supplies, especially storm runoff; g. Reduces unwanted noise; and h. Controls and directs excessive wind. 12-13-4 COSTS TO DEVELOPERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS: The City of Meridian recognizes that landscaping can be a significant expense to business people and residents. At the same time, landscaping improves the livability of residential neighborhoods, enhances the appearance and customer attraction of Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 9 (- commercial areas, increases property values, improves the compatibility of adjacent uses, screens undesirable views, and can reduce air and noise pollution. The intent of these regulations is to achieve a balance between the right of individuals to develop and maintain their property in a manner they prefer and the right of City residents to live, warle, shop, and recreate in pleasant, healthy, and attractive surroundings. 12-13-5 DEFINITIONS: BERM: An earthen mound designed to provide visual interest, screen undesirable views, and/or decrease noise. BUFFER: A combination of physical space and vertical elements, including but not limited to trees, shrubs, berms, fences, and/or walls that separate and screen incompatible land uses from one another. CALIPER: A measurement of the diameter of the tronle of a deciduous tree. The caliper of the trunk shall be measured six (6) inches above the ground for all trees up to and including 4- inch caliper size, and 12 inches above the ground for larger sizes. CASH ESCROW: Cash or certified checle submitted to the City Clerk for incomplete landscape improvements to secure a temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The money will be returned when the improvements are complete as per the approved landscape plan. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: Official certification that a building and site conform to the provisions of City Ordinance and any other appropriate conditions such as a Development Agreement, and/or Conditional Use Permit. Unless a certificate is issued, a structure cannot be occupied. CLASS I, II, III TREES: The classes of trees are defined for the purposes of this ordinance by the publication Tree Selection Guide for streets and landscapes throughout Idaho by the Urban Forestry Unit of the Boise ParIes & Recreation Department (latest edition). In general, Class I trees are smaller ornamental trees, Class II trees are medium/large trees appropriate for Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 10 COMMON LOT: COMMON OPEN SPACE: ENTRYWAY CORRIDORS: FRONTAGE: GIRDLING: GROSS LAND AREA: HARDSHIP: ( street tree planting, and Class III trees are very large. A lot separate from individual building lots. All street buffers, buffers between incompatible land uses, and open space must be on a common lot, owned and maintained by all residents or business-owners within a subdivision. Land area exclusive of street rights-of-way and street buffers, except for right-of-way specifically dedicated for landscaping within a subdivision. Street buffers wider than the required minimum dimension lnay count 50% of the additional area as open space. Open space may include trees, natural environmental features, playgrounds, water features, swimming pools, community centers, and recreational facilities. Common open space must be on a common lot. I Arterial roadways that introduce both visitors and residents to the City of Meridian, as defined by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The front of the lot, measured along the street from side property line to side property line. On corner lots and through lots, all sides of a lot adjacent to streets shall be considered frontage. Damaging or removing the bark and cambium layer around a tree tronlc in a manner that usually kills the tree. The total area of the land being developed, exclusive of required street buffers and buffers between incompatible land uses. The calculation for required open space in residential subdivisions and multi-family residential development is based on the gross land area of the land being developed. An unusual situation on the part of an individual property owner which will not permit that owner to enjoy the full utilization of their property as is enjoyed by others in the Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 11 HEAD-TO-HRW SPACING: HIGHER INTENSITY USE: IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: INFILL: LETTER OF CREDIT: MATCH LINES: MATCHED PRECIPITATION Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 ( community. A hardship can exist only when it is not self- created. Placement of sprinlder heads in a rectangular pattern such that one sprinkler head sprays to the next (spacing is 50% of the sprinlder's spray diameter.) For design flexibility, maximum spacing is up to 60% of the sprinkler's spray diameter. Where winds are a threat, spacing up to 40% may be desirable. When the purpose or activity for which a piece of land or its buildings is designed, arranged, or intended results in a greater degree of measurable noise, odor, light, vibration or other potential public nuisance than an adjacent property, it shall be deemed a higher intensity use. A surface that has been compacted or covered with a layer of material so that it is highly resistant to infiltration or absorption by water. It includes surfaces such as compacted sand or clay as well as most conventionally surfaced streets, roofs, sidewalks and parl<ing lots. Any vacant lot or parcel within developed area of the City, where at least 80 percent of the land within a 300 foot radius of the site has been developed, and where water, sewer, streets, schools and fire protection have already been developed and are provided. A letter issued by a bank or other guaranteed financial institution authorizing the City of Meridian to draw a stated amount of money from the issuing banlc under specific, stated conditions. A heavy line shown on a plan when it is separated onto two or more sheets. The lines are labeled the same on each sheet to depict whe're the sheets join. Sprinklers that are designed to warl, together on the same irrigation valve to deliver an equivalent rate of water Page 12 RATES: MICROPATH: MITIGATION~ MULCH: PARIGNG LOT OVERLAY: P ARIGNG LOT REPLACEMENT: PARICWAY: RESTRIPING (PARIGNG LO"T): SIGHT TRIANGLE: SOIL STABILIZATION: ( application, regardless of the arc of the nozzle being used. A pathway providing access by way of a short travellinle between points of destination. The length of a micropath is less than 250 feet, or two lot depths. An action that "Will moderate or alleviate the actual or potential loss of benefits provided to a site and its immediate vicinity by existing trees and landscaping. A protective covering placed around plants to prevent the evaporation of moisture, the freezing of roots, and the grovvth of weeds. Any re-surfacing of existing parldng lot areas "With asphalt or other permanent material. No increase in the square footage of the parking area may result. Removal of the existing parking surface done for the purpose Of improvement or repair. A landscaped area located between the edge of a street section or curb and a sidewall( dedicated to separate pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The intent is to increase pedestrian safety and to improve the visual aesthetics and environmental quality of roadways. Any change in the configuration, size or distribution of existing painted stripes designed to create spaces for motorized vehicles. The area on either side of an access way at its junction "With a street forming a triangle "Within which clear visibility of approaching vehicular or pedestrian traffic shall be maintained. The state of having sufficient vegetation and gradual slopes to prevent soil erosion and sedimentation onto adjacent features such as sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, lawns, or water bodies. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 13 STORMWATER SW ALE: TRIANGULAR SPACING: TOPPING: UNIMPROVED NATURAL FEATURES: 12-13-6 12-13-6-1 ( A broad, shallow channel covered with erosion-resistant vegetation and used to conduct, infiltrate, and pre-treat surface runoff. Maximum slopes are 3: 1. Placement of sprinkler heads in an equilateral triangular pattern. The distance between heads in each row must be head-to head spacing as per the definition in this section. The distance between rows is 0.866 times the spacing within the row. Topping is defined as severely cutting bacl< limbs to stubs within the tree's crown to such a degree as to remove the normal canopy and disfigure the tree. Good pruning practices rarely remove more thanI/4 to 1/3 of a tree's crown. Topping starves the tree of needed nutrients produced by leaves in the crown, increases vulnerability to insects and disease, creates weak limbs, rapid new growth, and disfigures the natural shape of the tree. Other common terms for topping include stubbing, heading, heading-back, stubbing off, tipping, lopping, or roundover. All forms of topping are prohibited by this ordinance. Existing wetlands, rock outcroppings, groves of trees, and other naturally occurring features may be left undeveloped in their natural state may be counted as open space with approval of the Planning Director. LANDSCAPE PLAN Applicability: A landscape plan is required for all commercial, industrial, office, and multi-family development, redevelopment, additions, or changes in use. A landscape plan is also required for all common lots in all subdivisions. The landscape plan is required as part of all applications for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)] Preliminary Plat (PP), Final Plat (FP), or Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC). The landscape plan may be on the same site plan used to show parl<ing layout, setback compliance, etc. A preliminary landscape plan review is recolnmended prior to submission for all developments, but is not required. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 14 ( ( 12-13-6-2 Submittal Requirements: All landscape plans shall comply with the requirements for size, scale, number of copies, and contents as detailed in the application form. 12-13-6-3 Landscape Plan Preparation: Preparing a landscape plan requires special skills. Landscaping involves more than a simple arrangement of plants with irrigation; plants are not haphazardly placed in a way the fills up leftover space. Landscape plans should be artfully and technically organized in a way that conveys coherence, design, and organization. The landscaping should enhance the physical environment as well as the project's aesthetic character. Also, requiring plans prepared by a landscape professional minimizes the likelihood of trees dying or interfering with other adjacent site features. Therefore, All landscape plans shall be prepared by a landscape architect, landscape designer, or qualified nurseryman. 12-13-6-4 Landscape Plan Modification: The approved Landscape Plan shall not be altered without prior approval of the Planning and Zoning Department. No significant field changes to the plan are permitted. Prior written approval of all material changes is required. All approved changes to the landscape plan must be documented prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 12-13-7 MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS & INSTALLATION 12-13-7-1 Approved Plant Material: The publication titled Tree Selection Guide for streets and landscapes throughout Idaho by the Urban Forestry Unit of the Boise Parl<s & Recreation Department (latest edition) is hereby adopted by this reference as the City of Meridian list of approved and prohibited plant material. The publication categorizes the trees by size as Class I, Class II, or Class III trees. The City recognizes that new plant varieties are being produced every year and will consider other species not listed in the publication. Copies of the publication will be available at the Planning and Zoning Department. 12-13-7 -2 Prohibited Plant Material: The plants listed under "Trees not permitted for Rights-of-Way Property Planting" are prohibited from Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 15 being planted along any street or within any parlcing lot regulated by this ordinance. The only exception is that conifers may be planted in street buffers around residential subdivisions, and in buffers' along 1-84. 12-13-7-3 Minimum Plant Sizes: The following are minimum plant sizes for all required landscape areas: Shade Trees: 2 inch caliper minimum Ornamental Trees: 2 inch caliper minimum Evergreen Trees: 6-7 foot height minimum Woody Shrubs: 2 gallon pot minimum 12-13-7-4 Tree Species Mix: When five (5) or more trees are to be planted to meet the requirements of any portion of this ordinance, including street trees, street buffers, parking lot landscaping and other landscape guidelines, a mix of species shall be provided. The number of species to be planted shall vary according to the overall number of trees required to be planted. See the table below: Required Number of Trees Minimum Number of Species 5-10 2 11-30 3 31-50 4 50+ 5 12-13-7 -5 Plant Quality: All plant material installed pursuant to this Ordinance shall meet or exceed the minimum federal standards as regulated by ANSI Z60.1, American Standard for Nursery Stoclc. 12-13-7~6 Planting Standards: All trees, shrubs, and other plant material shall be planted using accepted nursery standards as published by the American Association of Nurserymen (latest edition) including hole size, backfilling, and fertilization. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 16 ( 12-13-7-7 Stald.ng: Tree staking is not required, but may be used in areas with high winds or other situations that make stal<.ing desirable. If trees are staked, the stal(es must be removed within 12 months to prevent damage to the tree. 12-13-7-8 Mulch: An organic mulch such as bark or soil aid shall be applied to all planting areas for moisture retention, weed control, and moderation of soil temperatures. Impermeable plastic weed barrier is prohibited under the mulch, because it restricts water and oxygen to the roots. GraveVrock mulch is prohibited in required landscape areas as per 4.13.B. 12-13-7019 Curbing: All planting areas that border driveways, parldng lots, and other vehicle use areas shall be protected by curbing, wheel stops, or other approved protective devices. Such devices shall be a minimum of thirty (30) inches from all tree trunks to prevent cars from damaging tree trunks. 12-13-7 -10 Utilities: The following standards apply to the planting of trees near existing utilities and to trenching for new utilities near existing trees: A. Overhead Utilities: Only Class I trees in the Recommended Plant List may be planted under or within ten (10) lateral feet of any overhead utility wires. B. Underground Utilities: All trees shall be planted outside of any easelnent that contains a City water or sewer main, unless written approval is obtained from the City Engineer. If any utility easement precludes trees required by this ordinance, the width of the required buffer shall be increased to accommodate the required trees. c. Trenching: New underground utilities shall stay outside of the dripline of existing trees if trenched, or be tunneled a minimum of three (3) feet below existing grade within the tree's dripline. The guiding principle is that no root two (2) inches or larger shall be cut. Note: This requirement is for placement of new utilities and does not affect the City's ability to access existing utilities for repair and maintenance. Landscape Ordinance - Fina111/28/00 Page 17 12-13-7-11 Erosion Control: Soil and slope stabilization shall result from the landscape installation. 12-13-7-12 Berms: Berm slopes shall not exceed 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). 3:1 maximum slopes are recommended. Grass that requires mowing shall not be used on slopes steeper than 3: I. 12-13-7 -13 Water Efficiency: The landscape plan shall provide for water efficient landscaping as follows: A. Lawn Areas: Where appropriate and on sites where other landscape options can be incorporated, large expanses of lawn are discouraged due to its high water consumption. B. Mulch: Mulches shall be organic and broad uses of graveVrocl< mulch are restricted as per Section 4.8. Gravel does not retain water , reflects heat, and causes greater stress on trees and shrubs. Organic mulch retains water for a longer period of time for plants. C. Irrigation: Irrigation systems shall be designed for water efficiency as regulated by Section 5 of this Ordinance. D. Native Plants: Native and other low-water-use plants are encouraged. The Approved Plant List as per Section 4.1 shows the general water requirements of the trees. 12-13-8 IRRIGATION 12-13-8-1 Irrigation Required: All landscape areas regulated by this Ordinance shall be served with an automatic underground irrigation system. Additional requirements affecting pressurized irrigation systelTIS can be found in City Ordinance 9-1-28. 12-13-8-2 Performance Specifications: Three (3) copies of detailed irrigation performance specifications shall be submitted with the landscape plan for all Final Plats and Certificates of Zoning Compliance. Performance specifications shall state design requirements, materials, and construction methods. At a minimum, the performance specifications shall address the Landscape Ordinance - Pinal 11/28/00 Page 18 following requirements: A. Required Information Specifications for the irrigation system shall include: 1. available gallons per minute; 2. available water pressure; and 3. point of connection. B. Backflow Prevention Provide an appropriate bacl<flow prevention device as required by City Ordinance 9-3. c. Coverage The irrigation system shall be designed to provide 100% coverage with head to head spacing or triangular spacing as appropriate. D. Matched Precipitation Rates Sprinkler heads shall have matched precipitation rates within each control valve circuit. E. Irrigation Zones Sprinlder heads irrigating lawn or other high-water-demand areas shall be circuited so that they are on a separate zone or zones from those irrigating trees, shrubs, or other reduced- water-demand areas. F. Overspray Sprinkler heads shall be adjusted to reduce overspray onto impervious surfaces such as sidewalles, driveways, and parldng areas. 12-13-8-3 Irrigation Water: Use of nonpotable irrigation water is required when determined to be available by the City Public W or1es Department as regulated by City Ordinance 9-1-28. If city potable water is used, a separate water meter is recommended so the owner can avoid paying sewer fees for irrigation water. Potable water shall not be used as a primary irrigation water source on non-residential lots with more than V2 acre of landscaping. Year round water Landscape Ordinance - Final11/28/00 Page 19 availability is also required by connecting to city potable water or an on-site well as a secondary source. 12-13-8-4 Subdivision Irrigation Systems: If the irrigation system is part of a residential, commercial, or industrial subdivision, any irrigation pump station shall be on a common lot. Also, the irrigation system must be owned and maintained by an irrigation district or a Homeowners (or Business-owners) Association. 12-13-9 SIGHT TRIANGLES 12-13-9-1 Sight Triangles: The following standards shall be observed within all sight triangles, both at controlled and uncontrolled intersections. In all cases, Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) and Ada County Highway District (ACHD) standards shall apply in addition to City of Meridian standards. 12-13-9-2 Road/Road Intersections: The boundaries of a sight triangle at the intersection of two (2) roads are defined by measuring from the projected intersection of the roadway edge a distance of forty (40) feet along each roadway edge and connecting the two (2) points with a straight line. (See diagram below.) s.P6tr;. of fZ.o^D I I r I 1 I 1 'I, SIC?H'T ~\At..I(,LE.7/ 'h ' // "-J 1 ~'i / "'--7 ~~ +" + 40' I: \ '~"-"--~--f "-- P~OJEG,TEO \ 'ffZ..OPEIZlY --1 l- t f.J t=.. i I I I ~Efl.$.EG .JON Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 20 ( 12-13-9-3 RoadIDriveway Intersections: The boundaries of a sight triangle at the intersection of a road and a driveway are defined by measuring from the intersection of the property line and the edge of the driveway twenty (20) feet along the roadway and ten (1 0) feet along the driveway and connecting the two (2) points with a straight line. (See diagram below.) FP6?~ of I/IZt~WItY PJ:2.0pefZ-.T'( L\~E. _<.~':' ............. _L -,",,<,,_.~-~~,._--.. Et'bE OF tz.OI\O 12-13-9-4 RoadIRailroad Intersections: The sight triangle at road/road intersections (see Section 6.2) is also applicable to railroad-street crossings with the vision triangle defined by measuring forty (40) feet along the railroad property line and forty (40) feet along the roadway edge and connecting the two (2) points with a straight line. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 21 ( 12-13-9-5 Planting and Development Standards: A. Any trees planted within sight triangles (Class I or II) shall be pruned to a minimum height of eight (8) feet above the ground or sidewall< surface and fourteen (14) feet above the adjacent roadway surface. B. No evergreen trees shall be planted within any sight triangle. C. No Class III trees shall be planted within any sight triangle. D. The maximum height of any berm or vegetative groundcover at maturity within the sight triangle is three (3) feet. E. No fences higher than three (3) feet are permitted in the sight triangle. F. No signs taller than three (3) feet are permitted in the sight triangle, except for street/stop signs approved by the Ada County Highway District. Special consideration for sign location can be given by the Planning Director for lots in Old Town. 12-13-9-6 Public Safety & Enforcement: When the City determines that a sight obstruction exists, it shall notify the owner of the property upon which the obstruction is located and order that the obstruction be removed within thirty (30) days. The failure of the owner to remove the obstruction shall be punishable as a misdemeanor, and every day the owner fails to remove the obstruction shall be a separate and distinct offense. 12-13-10 STREET BUFFERS 12-13-10-1 Purpose: Landscape buffers along streets are required in order to improve the visual quality of the streetscape, to soften the impact of parldng lots, to unify diverse architecture, and to carry out the Comprehensive Plan policies related to promoting attractive roadways and street beautification. 12-13-10-2 Location: All required buffers shall be located beyond any street right-of-way and shall be maintained by the property owner upon which the buffer lies. All street buffers with attached sidewall<s shall Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 22 ( ( be measured from the property line and not from the sidewalk or curb. If detached sidewall<s are provided as per Section 7.8, the buffer may be measured from the back of curb when it can be demonstrated that there is no opportunity for expansion of the street section within the right-of-way; the buffer width must exclude the width of the sidewalk. No fences are permitted within required street buffers. 12-13-10-3 Applicability: Street buffers shall be required at all subdivision boundaries (i.e. commercial, industrial, office, and residential) and all commercial, industrial, and office developments. Single-family residential, duplex, and townhouse lots are exempt from required street buffers. All subdivision street buffers must be on a common lot, maintained by a home-owners or business-owners association, as applicable. 12-13-10-4 Buffer Size: The required width of the landscape buffer is calculated based on the Ada County Long Range Highway and Street Map (and future updates) as follows. Note: Residential Collectors do not have a required street buffer. Street Type Local Roads (except in residential areas per 7.3) Buffer Width 1 0 feet Urban Collector 20 feet Principal & Minor Arterials (other than entryway corridors) 25 feet Entryway Corridors (as defined in the Comprehensive Plan) 35 feet Interstate 84 50 feet 12-13-1.0-5 Width Reduction: In a development where the required street buffer width results in an otherwise unavoidable hardship to the property, a written request for a buffer reduction may be submitted to the Planning Director. The request must demonstrate evidence of the hardship caused by the required Landscape Ordinanc'e - Final 11/28/00 Page 23 ( street buffer and propose a specific alternative width. In no case shall the width be reduced to less than ten (10) percent of the depth of the lot without a Variance, except in Old Town. 12-13-10-6 Street Trees: All required landscape street buffers shall be planted with trees and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover, with a minimum density of one (1) tree per thirty- five (35) linear feet. If this calculation results in a fraction .5 or greater, round up to an additional tree. If the calculation results in a fraction less than .5, round the number down. 12-13-10-7 Tree Spacing: For design flexibility, trees may be grouped together or spaced evenly as desired. However, trees shall be spaced no closer than 80% of the average mature width of the trees, as demonstrated in the following examples: ~.x,6 ;2. .Jc-. .,. ...?:' -. ;.t. ..:. ......x . !. .; f ~ ~IB ~ ~ I( . 8 = ;2' "2 r tlfrt} ~aolr~--'/ J 10 +1; x.& ~:22 z. ,;;.... ~ .) trll, I Sf'.lc"i'lJ 3. Utilities Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 24 ( 1. 12-13-10-8 Par]avays and Detached Sidewal](s: Detached sidewalks are required along all arterial streets in new developments at the edge of existing city limits. The minimum width of the parlcvvay area between the curb and the sidewalk is five (5) feet. Tree plantings within parlcways less than ten (10) feet wide are restricted to Class II trees. Existing developments and infill projects may waive the requirement for detached sidewalks to match surrounding conditions. If detached sidewalks are provided on local streets in residential subdivisions, the minimum sidewall, width may be reduced to four (4) feet. 12-13-10-9 Landscaping within Right-of-Way: If the unimproved street right-of-way is greater than thirteen (13) feet from edge of pavement to edge of sidewall, or property line, and road widening project is not in the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) 5- year funded plan, developer shall maintain a ten (10) foot wide gravel shoulder and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative groundcover. This will require a license agreement between the property owner and ACHD. 12-13-10-10 Impervious Surfaces: Allowed impervious surfaces include driveways, signs and wallcways. Vehicle display pads and other related impervious surfaces are prohibited in the required street buffer. 12-13-10-11 Berms in Street Buffers: Berm design is subject to the provisions of Section 4.12 and 6.5.D of this ordinance. 12-13-10-12 Stormwater Detention: Stormwater swales may be incorporated into the buffer as provided for in Section 11. Other stonnwater detention and retention facilities shall not be permitted in the street buffer, except along 1-84. 12-13-11 PARIGNG LOTS 12-13-11-1 Right-of-Way Landscaping: A landscape buffer is required between all parking lots and adjacent streets as regulated by Section 7, Street Buffers. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 25 ( 12-13-11-2 Perimeter Landscaping: The following standards apply to all interior lot lines, side or rear, adjacent to parking lots or other vehicular use areas, including driveways: A. Purpose Perimeter landscaping defines parldng, loading, and other vehicular use areas and prevents two adjacent lots from becoming one large expanse of paving. This requirement does not hinder the ability to provide vehicular access between lots, nor does it prohibit commercial or industrial developments with back-to-bacl( trucl( docks from sharing paved loading areas. B. Size and Location Provide a five (5) foot minimum perimeter landscape strip along all interior lot lines that are adjacent to parldng, loading, or other paved vehicular use areas, including driveways, vehicle sales areas, truclc parldng areas, bus parldng areas, and vehicle storage areas. c. Landscaping The perimeter landscape strip shall be planted with one (1) tree per thirty five (35) lineal feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover. 12-13-11-3 Internal Landscaping: Interior parldng lot landscaping shall be required on any parldng lot with more than twelve (12) spaces. A. Required Percentage The required amount of landscaping is based on a sliding scale as follows: Total Number of Parking Spaces 13-100 -101-200 :' 201+ Percent of Total Area of a Parldng Lot that Must be an Interior Landscaped Area 4 percent 6 percent 8 percent Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 26 B. Planter Size Landscape planters shall contain a minimum of fifty (50) square feet and the planting area shall not be less than five (5) feet in any dimension, measured inside curbs. The only exception to the five- foot minimum dimension is at the tip of triangular planters located at the end of rows of angled parking. C. Parking Spaces No linear grouping of parking spaces shall exceed twelve (12) il1 a row, without an internal planter island. D. Parldng Lot Layout Interior landscaping shall, insofar as possible, be used to delineate and guide major traffic movement within the parldng area so as to prevent cross-space driving. Interior landscape planters shall be . spaced as evenly as feasible and at the ends of rows of parldng throughout the lot to consistently reduce the visual impact of long rows of parked cars. E. Trees Required Each interior planter that serves a single row of parldng spaces shall be landscaped with at least one (1) tree and shall be covered with low shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover. Each interior planter that serves a double row of parldng spaces shall have at least two (2) trees and shall be covered with low shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover. Deciduous shade trees must be pruned to a minimum height of eight (8) feet above the adjacent parldng areas. Evergreen trees and Class III trees are prohibited in interior planters. F. Design Flexibility In parking areas where the strict application of subsection 8.3.A will seriously limit the function and circulation of the lot, up to fifty (50) percent of the required landscaping may be located near the perimeter of the paved area to emphasize entrance corridors or special landscape areas within the general parldng area. Such required interior landscaping which is relocated shall be in addition to perimeter landscape and right of way screening requirements. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 27 ( G. Industrial Exclusion Industrial parldng, storage, and loading areas are specifically excluded from the interior landscape requirements, but shall still be required to meet all perimeter and right of way landscape and screening requirements. 12-13-11-4 Existing Parldng Lot Applicability Existing parldng lots shall be required to conform to this section based upon the following guidelines: A. For restriping, parking lot overlays, or parking lot replacement less than 25%, no additional landscaping shall be required. B. For parldng lot replacement that is 25-50% of the parking area, Perimeter and Right of Way Landscaping as required by the Ordinance shall be installed. c. For parking lot replacement that is greater than 50% of the parking area, all current landscape standards of the Ordinance shall be met. D. If the location of existing buildings or other structures prevents conformance with the requirements of this section, or if its implementation would create a non-conformity with parldng standards, the Planning Director shall determine how the Code is to be applied. 12-13-12 BUFFERS BETWEEN DIFFERENT LAND USES 12-13-12-1 Purpose: The landscape requirements in this section are intended to ensure incompatible, adjoining land uses are adequately protected and are provided an appropriate amount of land separation to conduct permitted uses without causing adverse impact. An incompatible land use is defined as one that is more intensely developed than its neighbor (as defined herein under section 9.4) and typically involves minimizing potential nuisances such as noise, dirt, litter, glare of lights, or other objectionable activities. The buffers are required along the entire contiguous property line. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 28 12-13-12-2 Responsibility for Buffer Construction: The required buffer between different land uses shall be provided by the higher intensity use and shall be located on the building site of the higher intensity use, except as determined otherwise by the Planning Director after written request. If a lower intensity use is proposed adjacent to an existing higher intensity use with no buffer, the lower intensity use must provide the required buffer. 12-13-1,2-3 Buffer Materials: The materials within the required buffer between incompatible land uses are regulated as follows: A. Mix of Materials All buffer areas shall be comprised of, but not limited to, a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover. Fences, walls and berms may also be incorporated into the buffer area. B. Barrier Effectiveness The required buffer area shall result in an effective barrier within three (3) years and be maintained such that sixty percent (60%) or more of the vertical surface is closed and prevents the passage of vision through it. Trees may be spaced closer as necessary to achieve this goal. c. Buffer Walls Where existing or proposed adjacent land uses cannot be adequately buffered with plant material(s), the City may require inclusion of a wall, fence, or other type of screen that mitigates noise and/or unsightly uses. If a wall or fence at least six (6) feet tall is provided, the planting requirement may be reduced to at least one tree per 35 lineal feet, plus shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover must be provided within the buffer area, in lieu of the requirements of subsection B. D. Chainlink Fencing Chainlink or cyclone fencing, with or without slats, is prohibited within required buffers between different land uses. Chainlink may be used beyond the required buffer. Chainlinlc fencing does not qualify as a screening material; Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 29 therefore the buffer must still be landscaped as per subsection B, even if a chainlinl( fence is provided. 12-13-12-4 Land Use Intensity Classifications: The table below is intended to provide a general classification of land use intensities for commonly proposed developments and is not a comprehensive list. If a land use is not listed, the intensity classification shall be determined by the Planning Director based upon the nearest use listed. Class I I Class II Class III Class N Class V Single Family Multi-Family Offices Restaurants Heavy Homes Dwellings Manufacturing Duplexes Child Care Neighbor. HoteVMotel Contractor Centers Comm. Yards Golf Courses Libraries Middle General Retail Processing Schools Plants Cemeteries Senior Centers High Schools Grocery Stores Recycling ParIes Nurseries/Greenh Personal Parking Garages ouses Services Elementary Quasi Public Warehouses Vacant Land Schools Uses zoned: Vacant Land Clinics Storage 1-L zoned: Facilities R-2 Vacant Land Indoor zoned: Manufacturing R-3 R-15 Vacant Land zoned: R-4 R-40 L-O Vacant Land zoned: R-8 C-N C-G, C-C 12-13-12-5 Minimum Buffer Widths The minimum buffer width between incompatible land uses is based on the following table: Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 30 Intensity Class of Adjacent Use Intensity Class of I II III N V Proposed Use I II 20 III 20 20 IV 25 20 20 V 35 30 25 20 Table Notes: a) Buffer widths are shown in feet. b) No buffer is required for blanl( (shaded) cells, unless an existing, adjacent and hig~er intensity use has not provided a buffer. In such cases, the lower intensity use must provide the buffer as per 9.2. c) The buffers between land uses are required only along contiguous lot lines. If incompatible land uses are across a public street from one another, the street buffer re.quirements of Section 7 apply. 12-13-12-6 Pedestrian Access: Landscaping and screens shall not eliminate pedestrian access from residential development to abutting commercial districts and vice versa. 12-13-12-7 Existing Partial Buffers: If all or any part of the buffer has been provided on the adjacent property, the proposed use must provide only that amount of the buffer which has not been provided on the adjacent property. 12-13-1'2-8 Relationship to Parldng Lot Perimeter Requirements: All buffers between different land uses may include any required perimeter parl<.ing lot landscape strips (see Section 8.2) when calculating the minimum width of the buffer. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 31 12-13-1.2-9 Buffers along Pathways: All commercial, industrial, and office developments shall provide a five (5) foot wide minimum buffer adjacent to any planned pathways in the City's Comprehensive Plan or Park System Master Plan. The buffer shall be planted with a minimum of one (1) tree per thirty five (35) lineal feet. 12-13-13 TREE PRESERVATION 12-13-13-1 Purpose: This section is intended to preserve existing trees four (4) inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development process. 12-13-13-2 Site Design: Site plans shall make all feasible attempts to accommodate existing trees four (4) inch caliper or greater within their design. 12-13-13-3 Landscape Plan: All existing trees greater than four (4) inch caliper shall be shown on the landscape plan as per Section 3.5.H. Indicate whether each tree is to be retained or removed. Include on the plan a description of how existing trees to be retained are to be protected during construction as per Section 3.5.1. 12-13-13-4 Protection During Construction: Existing trees that are retained shall be protected from damage to bark, branches, and roots during construction. The City of Meridian Parks Department arborist shall approve the protection fence(s) prior to construction. Construction, excavation, or fill occurring within the drip line of any existing tree may severely damage it. Any severely damaged tree shall be replaced in accordance with Subsection 10.6 of this Ordinance. 12-13-13-5 Construction within the Dripline of Existing Trees: Specific requirements for construction within the dripline of existing trees are as follows: A. Paving Whenever possible, impervious paving surfaces shall remain outside of the dripline of existing trees. When it is not possible, impervious surfaces shall be allowed at a distance from the trunk of a retained tree equal to the Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 32 ( diameter of the tree trunl( plus five (5) feet. B. Grade Changes Grade changes greater than six (6) inches are prohibited within the dripline of existing trees. c. Compaction Most of the damage to trees caused by machinery occurs to the root system from compaction of the soil. A simple fence or barrier that encloses the entire area beneath the tree canopy shall be in place prior to construction. D. Utilities New underground utilities to be placed within the dripline of existing trees shall be installed as per Section 4.10. C of this Ordinance. 12-13-13-6 Mitigation Trees: Mitigation is required for all existing trees four (4) inch caliper or greater that are rellloved from the site with equal replacelTIent of the total calipers lost on site. Example: two (2) 10-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four (4) 5-inch caliper trees, five (5) 4-inch caliper trees, or seven (7) 3-inch caliper trees. Existing prohibited trees within the street buffer or parking lot need not be mitigated for if they are removed. Existing dead, dying, or hazard trees need not be mitigated for if they are removed. The City of Meridian Parks Department arborist shall certify any dead, dying, or hazard trees prior to relTIoval. Trees that are required to be removed by another governmental agency having jurisdiction over the project need not be mitigated for. 12-13-13-7 Required Landscaping: Existing trees that are retained or relocated on site may count toward the required landscaping. Mitigation trees are in addition to all other landscaping required by this ordinance. 12-13-13-8 Incentives: The Planning Director may allow a reduction up to ten percent (10%) of the required parl<ing spaces to accommodate existing trees. Approval of the reduction in required parking must be obtained in writing prior to submittal of plans. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 33 ( ( 12-13-14 STORMWATER INTEGRATION 12-13-14-1 Purpose: The City encourages the incorporation of vegetated, well-designed stormwater filtration swales into required landscape areas where topography and hydrologic features allow. Such integrated site designs can improve water quality and provide a natural, effective form of flood and water pollution control. 12-13-14-2 Design Guidelines: Below are requirements for designing a landscape area that integrates stormwater facilities. The Planning & Zoning and Public Works Departments should be involved in the initial design and determining the appropriateness of any site. A. Stormwater swales incorporated into required landscape areas shall be vegetated with grass or other appropriate plant materials. They shall also be designed to accommodate the required number of trees as per this ordinance if located in a street buffer or other required landscape area. B. A rocl( sump may be incorporated into a vegetated swale to facilitate drainage. The rock sump inlet may not exceed more than five (5) feet in any horizontal dimension. Grates for sand/grease interceptors may also be incorporated, but the inlet structures may not exceed two (2) feet in any horizontal dimension. C. Gravel, rocl(, or cobble stormwater facilities are not permitted on the surface of required landscape areas. Cobble may be incorporated into required landscape areas if designed as a dry creele bed or other design feature. D. Plant materials shall be a species that are able to withstand the anticipated changes in soil wetness and moisture levels. E. Organic mulch shall not be used against drainage catch basins due to potential sediment clogging. F. Open water ponds and holding areas with a permanent water level are not permitted in required landscape or Landscape Ordinance - Fina111/28/00 Page 34 ( buffer areas, except along Interstate-84. However, ponds that are aesthetically designed with special grading and vegetative features may be approved as provided for in Section 15, Alternative Compliance. G. Slopes must be less than 3: 1 (horizontal:vertical) for accessibility and maintenance. H. The stonnwater facility must be designed free-draining with no standing water within 24 hours of the completion of a stann event. 12-13-15 MICROPATH LANDSCAPING: 12-13-15-1 Purpose: The purpose of this section is to promote trees and other landscaping along micropaths developed within the City. The required landscaping will provide shade and visual interest along the micropaths. 12-13-15-2 Applicability: Whenever micropaths are developed within a subdivision or connecting from a subdivision to another subdivision or other destinations, the landscaping standards within this section shall apply. 12-13-1.5-3 Planter Width: A landscape strip a minimum of five (5) feet wide shall be provided along both sides of the path. Additional width is encouraged to allow trees to be planted further from the pathway and prevent root damage to the path. 12-13-15-4 Required Plants: The landscape strips shall be planted with a minimum of one (I) deciduous tree per thirty-five (35) linear feet and shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. 12-13-15-5 Tree Branching Height: Trees along the pathway shall be pruned with a clear branching height of at least eight (8) feet above the path surface. 12-13-1.5-6 Shrub Height: Shrubs are limited to three (3) feet high or less at mature size to allow for safety provisions and sight distance. Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 35 ( 12-13-15-7 Mulch: The solitary use of mulches such as bark alone without vegetative ground covers is prohibited. Mulch under the trees and shrubs is required as per Section 4.8. 12-13-15-8 Prohibited Trees: No evergreen trees or Class III trees shall be planted within the required landscape strip due to safety, sight distance, and maintenance concerns. 12-13-15-9 Fences: Fences adjacent to a micropath landscape strip are recommended to be "see through" as it provides better visibility from adjacent homes or buildings. If solid fencing is used, it shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. The developer is responsible for the construction of the fences adjacent to all micropaths. The fence restrictions shall be included as a note on all Final Plats that include a micropath. 12-13-16 RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OPEN SPACE 12-13-16-1 Purpose: The purpose of this section is to provide common open space in all new residential subdivisions and multi-family developments. 12-13-16-2 Open Space Requirement: The total land area of all common open space shall equal or exceed five (5) percent of the gross land area of the subdivision. This requirement shall apply to all single- family residential subdivisions of five (5) acres or more. Multi- family developments shall provide common open space that equals or exceeds ten (1 0) percent of the gross land area of the development. 12-13-16-3 Open Space Defined: Common open space shall mean land area exclusive of street rights-of-way and street buffers, except for right-of-way specifically dedicated for landscaping within a subdivision. Street buffers wider than the required minimum dimension may count 50% of the additional area as open space. Stormwater detention facilities must be designed in accordance with Section 11.2 of this Ordinance in order to count toward the open space requirement. Open space may be active or passive in its intended use, and must be accessible by all residents of the Landscape Ordinance - Pinal 11/28/00 Page 36 ( subdivision. 12-13-16-4 Location: The common open spaces shall be located on a common lot. Common open space shall be grouped contiguously with open space from adjacent subdivisions or phases whenever feasible. 12-13-16-5 Required Improvements & Landscaping: Com:r;non open space shall be suitably improved for its intended use, except that natural features such as wetlands, rock outcroppings, ponds, creeks, etc. may be left unimproved. At a minimum, common open space lots shall include one (1) deciduous shade tree per eight thousand (8,000) square feet and lawn, either seed or sod. 12-13-16-6 Pathways: Pedestrian pathway linkages from the subdivision to adjacent existing or planned trails shall be provided. 12-13-16-7 Maintenance: Land shown on the final plat as common open space may be conveyed to the City (if the Parl<s Department agrees to accept conveyance). In lieu of public dedication, it must be conveyed to an owners association for the purpose of owning and maintaining the common area and improvements thereon. 12-13-17 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 12-13-17-1 Purpose: All required landscaping must be maintained in a healthy, growing condition at all tilnes. 12-13-17-2 Responsibility: The property owner is responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and screening devices required by this Ordinance. 12-13-17-3 Maintenance Defined: Maintenance shall include watering, weeding, pruning, mowing, litter removal, pest control, and removaVrepair of vandalism as needed to maintain a neat and orderly appearance. 12-13-17-4 Topping Prohibited: It shall be unlawful to top any street tree required by this ordinance. Topping is defined as severely cutting Landscape Ordinance - Fina111/28/00 Page 37 back limbs to stubs within the tree's crown to such a degree as to remove the normal canopy and disfigure the tree. 12-13-17-5 Tree Grates: Tree grates must be widened to accommodate the growing tree trunk and prevent girdling of any trees planted in tree wells within sidewalks or other public right of way. 12-13-17-6 Dead & Diseased Plant Materials: Plant materials which exhibit evidence of insect pests, disease, and/or damage shall be appropriately treated to correct the problem. Dead plant lnaterials shall be replaced. 12-13-17-7 Inspections: All landscaping required by this ordinance will be subject to periodic inspections by city officials to detennine compliance or to investigate complaints made against the property. 12-13-17-8 Enforcement: Where any property owner to which this ordinance applies fails to maintain the required trees, landscaping, or screening devices, the City may issue a written notice requiring the owner to replace any dead or dying trees or other plant materials that were required by their approved landscape plan or by this ordinance; repair or replace any required screening devices that have been destroyed, removed, or are in a state of disrepair; remove weeds; or perform any other action necessary to comply with the requirements of this ordinance. 12-13-17-9 Penalty: The owner shall comply with the provisions of the written notice within sixty (60) days of issuance of the notice. Failure of the owner to comply with the notice within the specified time frame shall be punishable as a misdemeanor; and every day the owner fails to comply shall be a separate and distinct offense. 12-13-17-10 Extension: The Planning Director may grant an extension of time beyond the required sixty (60) day period due to seasonal or adverse weather conditions which malce replanting or replacement impractical. In no case shall the extension exceed six (6) months. Landscape Ordinance - Fina111/28/00 Page 38 ( ( 12-13-1 7 -II Contract Option: If the site is not maintained as required, the City of Meridian has the right to declare the property a nuisance and contract maintenance at the expense of the property owner. 12-13-18 ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE 12-13-18-1 Purpose: The intent of this section is to encourage creative solutions to land-use problems. The City recognizes that the specific requirements of this landscape ordinance cannot and do not anticipate all possible landscape situations. In addition, the City recognizes that there may be landscape proposals which conform to the purpose, intent, and objectives of the landscape regulations but were not anticipated in the specific regulations. Therefore, the Department of Planning & Zoning may allow for a method of alternative compliance in the event of these situations. 12-13-18-2 Conditions: Requests for alternative compliance are allowed only when one or more of the following conditions are met: A. Topography, soil, vegetation, or other site conditions are such that full compliance is impossible or impractical. B. The site involves space limitations or an unusually shaped lot. C. Due to a change of use on an existing site, the required landscape buffer is larger than can be provided. D. Additional environmental quality improvements would result from the alternative compliance. E. Safety considerations make alternative compliance desirable. F. Other regulatory agencies or departments having jurisdiction are requiring design standards that conflict with the requirements of this Ordinance. G. The proposed design includes innovative design features based on "New Urbanism," "Neo-Traditional Design," or Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 39 ( other current planning topics. H. The applicant is proposing a pond with a permanent water level in a required landscape area. 12-13-18-3 Submittal Requirements: The following items are required to apply for Alternative Compliance. Note: if a project is being submitted as a Planned Development, a separate application for Alternative Compliance is not required. A. A written request for alternative compliance shall be submitted to the Planning & Zoning Department prior to submittal of the development application. The request shall state: ( I.) The ordinance requirements that are proposed to be modified; (2.) The project conditions in subsection 2 which justify the proposed alternative; and (3.) How the proposed alternative meets or exceeds the intent of said requirement. B. A conceptual site plan and other information as necessary to illustrate the proposed method of alternative compliance. c. An application fee as set by City Council. 12-13-18-4 Design Flexibility: The Planning Director or the Director's designee shall have authority to vary on a case-by-case basis the required landscaping where an alternative requirement would address unique site conditions and allow design flexibility while still serving the intent of the Landscape Ordinance. 12-13-18-5 Variance: If compliance with this ordinance is not possible and there is no feasible proposal for alternative compliance which is, in the judgement of the Planning Director, equal or better than normal compliance, the applicant must apply for a Variance in Landscape Ordinance - Final11/28/00 Page 40 ( \ (" accordance with the provisions of section 11-18-2 of the City Ordinance. The applicant may also appeal the decision to the City Council by filing an appeal with the City Clerl<.'s office. 12-13-18-6 Precedent: Alternative Compliance shall be limited to the specific project under consideration and shall not establish precedent for acceptance in other cases. 12-13-18-7 Timeline: The Planning Director or the Director's designee shall respond to the applicant within 15 working days regarding acceptance or denial of the proposed alternative. 12-13-19 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 12-13-19-1 Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: All required landscaping and site features must be installed according to the approved landscape plan prior to issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy. Private site improvements that are above and beyond the requirements placed on the application do not require completion prior to occupancy-for example a clubhouse in a residential subdivision need not be completed prior to occupancy of residences in the subdivision. 12-13-1 9-2 Extension of Time for Compliance: The Planning Director may issue a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for a specified time period, not to exceed 270 days when, due to weather or other circumstances, the landscaping or other required site amenities cannot be completed. Whenever a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is issued, the following shall apply. A. Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow A letter of credit or cash escrow for one hundred ten percent (110%) of the cost of installation must be filed with the City ClerIc prior to issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. A formal bid must accompany the letter of credit or cash escrow. The letter of credit or cash escrow shall be effective for a minimum of twelve (12) months. The letter of credit or cash escrow will not be released until all landscaping and other site amenities are completed as shown on the approved site plan. Landscape Ordinanc.e - Fina111/28/00 Page 41 B. Permission to Enter Property Any property owner wishing to malce arrangements with the City for a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy must also allow the City to enter upon the land for the purposes of installing the required landscaping and other site amenities in the event that the landscaping is not in place when the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy expires. SECTION 16: All ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, rescinded and annulled. SECTION 17: VALIDITY: The Meridian City Council hereby declares that any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance as adopted and amended herein be declared for any reason to be invalid it is the intent of the Meridian City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of an~T portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 18: SAVINGS CLAUSE: This Ordinance does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this Ordinance talces effect. SECTION 19: DATE OF EFFECT: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage, approval and publication, according to law. PAS~ED BY TM CITYl~Ol!NCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 5~!.- day of ce'In<:?'VV, 2000. APPROVED B~H~YOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 5.fb. day of re t,,-v, 2000. ATTEST: CT:1~L 11....2 ..i..J l' -:} ~ -'~ ~ 7 li.') -::. ." ~) CbC).::- ~ ~..\..~' (/:$..,... 1~~'-. ., '\ ~.p~:;; '/ v') """,, t b \ " :-<. y ~....... z:\ W ork\M\Meridian\Meridian 15360M\Ordinances Ci ty <<~~~~diM!.1.Ce~~)';~~iagramOrd(TempUSe) .wpd 'I" i&" \,\ -1//1'1 ~' ~ .;. -f l j t t \ -\ \. \" Landscape Ordinance - Final 11/28/00 Page 42 ( ( ( ( ;;3 :REcEIVED DEe 1 9 2000 CITY OF lVIERIDIAN DELINQUENCY FOR TURN OFF SCHEDULED FOR 12/21/00 MAYOR: This is to inform you in writing, if you choose to, you have the right to a predetermination hearing at 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, December 19,2000, before the Mayor and City Council to appear in person to be judged on the facts and to defend the claim made by this City that your water, sewer and trash bill is delinquent. You may retain counsel. This service will be discontinued on December 21,2000, unless payment is received in full. Is there anyone present who wishes to contest his or her water, sewer and trash delinquency? (No response.) MAYOR: They are hereby informed that they may appeal or have the decision of the City reviewed by the Fourth Judicial District Court, pursuant to Idaho State Code. Even though they appeal, their water will be shut off. The amount of the turn-off list is $41,093.21. .J ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 1 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:50am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer. Cust No = {<} 9900000 Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 4.1204.2 KNIGHT, TIMOTHY 94.74 60.56 34.18 11/21/2000 31 .88 - 74.2744.1 ABBOTT, KEVIN & SHAWNA 89.55 40.47 49.08 11/14/2000 59.08 - none 34.3240.2 ABBOTT,REBECCA 132.93 66.63 66.30 11/22/2000 121.81 - 4.0868.2 ABLE, MICHAEL 119.10 76.53 42.57 11/22/2000 37.73 - 74.2507.1 ACHD 575.10 575.10 10/11/2000 113.40 - 35.1172.1 ACOUSTIC SYSTEMS 74.84 40.66 34.18 10/13/2000 31.88 - 69.0632.1 ADAMS, RAYMOND & VICKIE 127.79 59.59 68.20 11/03/2000 75.74 - none 35.0190.2 AHEARN, THOMAS 95.40 59.27 36.13 11/29/2000 41 . 00 ~ 1 .1360.1 AKERS, GENEVA 277.60 168.83 108.77 10/19/2000 279.52 - none 74.2452.1 ALLEN, RICHARD L. 91.85 42.85 49.00 11/24/2000 57.69 - none 31.3422.1 ALLEN, TIM 93.13 52.88 40.25 11/28/2000 56.19 - none 20.1496.1 ALLRED, GLENN & CHANA 60.4 7 34.09 26.38 10/10/2000 24.08 - none 33.0217.2 AL TIG, KENNETH 43.93 7.63 34.18 2.12 34.2730.1 ALVEREZ, ROSALlO 87.57 37.92 32.67 16.98 11/24/2000 32.00 - none 19.7336.2 ANDERSON, MICHAEL 150.16 109.91 40.25 11/02/2000 36.64 - 21.1714.1 ANDERSON, SCOTT 103.25 50.56 52.69 11/06/2000 65.07 - none 50.0554.2 ANGELL, MICHELLE 74.00 35.24 38.76 1 0/19/2000 56.45 - 46.4750.1 APPLEBEE'S 1,785.76 1 ,564.11 221.65 12/13/2000 238.74 - 68.0070.1 ARES, TONY 97.40 50.25 46.40 .75 11/29/2000 42.00 - none" 2.2110.1 ARMAS, SAMUEL 349.61 154.40 117.10 78.11 10/16/2000 91.00 - none 42.1988.2 ARMSTRONG, GARY & LAURA 100.67 52.96 47.71 11/27/2000 57.71 - 68.0040.1 ARMSTRONG. LANCE 106.50 54.48 52.02 11/13/2000 50.87 - none 53.0700.1 ARNOLD MACHINERY 679.42 365.63 313.79 1 0/24/2000 138.59 - none 68.0334.1 ASCHENBRENNER, STEVEN 52.76 26.38 26.38 10/12/2000 24.08 - none 19.1677.1 ASHFORD GREENS CLUB HOUS 79.14 52.76 26.38 11/24/2000 25.31 - 4.1770.2 AUSTIN, TERRY 137.78 66.43 70.80 .55 11/20/2000 121.39 - 42.1028.1 AV II L.L.C. 1,100.57 614.89 485.65 .03 1 0/13/2000 479.61 - none 42.1034.1 AV II L.L.C. 1,251.89 668.65 583.24 10/13/2000 639.96 - none 64.3040.2 AVERY, WILLIAM 82.22 46.81 35.41 10/11/2000 86.06 - 42.2148.1 AZARY, SUSAN 77.85 32.86 44.99 1 0/20/2000 104.74 - none 51.0180.1 B M C, WEST 80.48 46.72 33.76 1 0/23/2000 33.76 - none 32.1562.2 BABBITT, BARBARA 80.99 46.81 34.18 1 0/25/2000 31.88 - 21.2736.1 BAILEY, MICHELLE 94.05 46.73 47.32 11/28/2000 50.00 - none 51.0694.1 BAILEY, PEGGY 74.28 50.38 23.90 11/29/2000 41.60 - none 22.1220.1 BAILEY. THOMAS 148.09 76.67 71.42 10/27/2000 87.49 - none 3.0326.1 BAIN, RAND 201.06 139.06 62.00 11/29/2000 70.69 - none 33.2424.1 BAINE, JAMES 69.36 39.01 26.38 3.97 12/14/2000 58.44 - none 74.2676.1 BAIRD, KAREN LEE 89.39 46.54 42.85 11/22/2000 72.45 - none 33.3626.2 BALL, TERESA 84.84 40.66 44.18 11/02/2000 31.88 - 69.0590.1 BAPTISTE, MONTGOMERY 125.35 66.64 58.71 11/27/2000 130.00 - none 32.0744.1 BARNARD, WILLIAM 90.31 47.82 42.49 11/22/2000 69.87 - none 46.0106.1 BARNES, DAVID 75.35 42.76 32.59 11/21/2000 31.44 - none 15.0046.1 BARNETT, SHERRY 93.23 64.25 28.98 1 0/16/2000 30.37 - 50.1912.2 BARNHART, RICK 90.55 54.13 36.42 11/29/2000 31.58 - 22.1740.2 BARNHART, RYAN 79.60 45.46 30.21 3.93 11/29/2000 50.00 - 43.2448.2 BARON, KONA & MICHELLE 88.37 51.73 36.64 11/28/2000 34.34 - 74.2822.1 BARR, KENNETH 215.19 84.84 130.35 11/28/2000 136.58 - none 68.0248.1 BARRETT, DONALD 30.88 6.48 24.40 10/12/2000 24.08 - none 2.0472.1 BARTH, JEFF 125.63 78.06 47.57 10/27/2000 79.71 - none 68.0256.2 BASURA, JOSEPH. 69.31 34.04 35.27 11/02/2000 18.05 - 4.2096.3 BATES, LANCE 145.29 97.09 48.20 11/29/2000 40.00 - u* in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent J ( ( i CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 2 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:50am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 21.2960.1 BEACH, MALCOM & PEGGY 151 .33 41.39 109.94 10/17/2000 288.92 - none 31.3400.2 BEAN,DONOVAN 115.70 35.24 28.76 42.37 9.33 12/13/2000 50.00 - 1.0030.1 BEAUDOIN, JOHN R 78.45 52.76 25.69 11/28/2000 27.00 - none 32.0950.1 BECKER. NICHOLAS 107.78 46.45 60.88 .45 11/27/2000 102.49 - none 46.0448.1 BEERY, LON 92.22 41.89 50.33 11/27/2000 70.99 - none 31.1004.1 BEHNER. ROBERT 140.44 69.45 70.99 11/29/2000 76.00 - none 33.1828.1 BELL, RONALD & JULIE 76.74 42.84 33.90 11/27/2000 50.05 - none 46.0836.1 BENNETT, GREG 137.69 58.83 32.67 29.14 17.05 09/20/2000 40.00 - none 46.0834 .2 BENNETT, GREG 79.34 43.12 35.41 .81 11/27/2000 30.00 - 19.6688.1 BENNETT, MASON 127.18 88.16 39.02 11/16/2000 50.33 - none 69.0874.1 BERNESCONI, JOE 52.76 26.38 26.38 10/13/2000 26.54 - none 21.3076.1 BERRY, GALE 56.23 11 .40 44.83 10/13/2000 73.28 - none 74.3296.1 BIENAPFL, ROB & CARMEN 75.18 32.59 42.59 11/27/2000 8.77 - none 21.1754.1 BINGHAM, KEVIN W. 208.91 67.78 141.13 10/13/2000 189.50 - none 74.2724.1 BISHOP, CALVIN 165.53 83.08 82.45 11/27/2000 90.00 - none 22.1342.2 BISIG, JOSEPH W 97.26 56.79 40.4 7 11/22/2000 55.39 - 4.1834.1 BITONI, MARK 120.05 72.70 47.35 11/06/2000 77.11 - none 33.2764.1 BLAKE, TRAVIS 106.04 56.26 49.78 10/16/2000 114.80 - none 4.2200.1 SLAYE, LUCREZIA 113.63 72.84 40.79 11/21/2000 79.00 - none 22.1008.1 BLEDSOE, GARNETT 147.91 72.17 75.74 11/20/2000 100.00 - none 21.3290.2 BOBKO, RAYMOND 219.38 119.08 100.30 11/24/2000 136.48 - 50.1726.1 BOESIGER, MAX 69.24 32.86 36.38 10/19/2000 51.85 - none 51.0506.1 BOGGIS, CONNIE 67.36 36.92 30.44 10/30/2000 57.11 - none 22.2068.1 BOISE BEST BUILDERS 129.68 50.66 34.18 31.88 12.96 40.0288.1 BOISE VALLEY CONSTRUCTION 81.27 43.26 38.01 11/02/2000 40.63 - none 52.0246.1 BOLO'S PUB & EATERY 766.80 242.09 192.57 215.74 116.40 11/24/2000 192.57 - none 21.2794.1 BOMER, MICHAEL 80.27 48.91 31.36 11/03/2000 41.28 - none 74.3950.1 BORCHART, MICHAEL 412.30 203.69 208.61 11/27/2000 21 0.99 ~ none 21.2124.3 BOUDREAU, YVETTE 142.87 106.23 36.64 11/29/2000 31 .88 - 34.1880.1 BOUR, SHANNON 141.19 73.22 67.97 11/29/2000 93.11 - none 51.3810.1 BOWEN, MARK 72.77 32.86 39.91 11/16/2000 74.18 - none 32.1372.2 BOYD, JAMES 79.48 45.44 34.04 10/12/2000 65.94 - 21.3068.1 BOYDSTUN, PATRICK & JUDY 92.78 49.15 43.63 11/29/2000 60.00 - none 22.0922.2 BRADY,RODNEY 100.67 41.89 58.78 10/12/2000 51.56 - 51.0706.2 BRANDT, LORELI 112.55 60.09 52.38 .08 10/17/2000 100.00 - 5.0312.1 BRASFIELD, WILLIAM B. 151.11 89.53 61.58 11/01/2000 78.88 - none 21.1054.1 BRAUNSTEIN, BERNARD & KARL 99.21 56.71 42.50 11/24/2000 70.00 - none 21.0178.1 BREINHOLT, AARON 92.06 43.12 48.94 11/20/2000 65.09 - none 5.0264.1 BRENNAN,TERRENCE 395.51 149.16 111.34 135.01 10/17/2000 140.00 - none 32.0926.1 BRIGGS, NADINE 133.10 60.62 72.48 11/27/2000 105.00 - none 21.2564.3 BRINEGAR, E.E. 36.09 12.96 6.48 6.48 10.17 09/20/2000 30.51 - 2.3702.1 BRINEGAR, E.E. 89.14 52.76 36.38 1 0/23/2000 56.32 - none 4.1674.1 BRINKERHOFF, JOHN 258.71 154.36 73.07 31 .28 11/21/2000 100.00 - none 19.4456.1 BROOKS FULLER HOMES 206.26 1 50.12 56.14 11/27/2000 67.68 - none 21.2674.1 BROOKS, JOHN 82.45 43.85 38.60 11/02/2000 68.20 - none 51.0334.1 BROWN. MATTHEW & JULIE 81.98 44.21 37.73 .04 11/27/2000 36.00 - none 43.2424.2 BROWN, PAUL 74.84 40.66 34.18 10/17/2000 31.88 - 31.3306.1 BRYANT, JAMIE 98.09 64.05 34.04 11/30/2000 138.75 - none 74.3226.1 BUCHSIEB. GWENDOL YN 82.96 42.71 40.25 11/14/2000 34.18 - none 32.1670.1 BUCKEY, STEPHAN 64.16 32.86 31.30 10/13/2000 52.37 - none 34.1844.1 BUFFAT, STEPHEN 172.79 94.02 78.77 11/29/2000 108.61 - none 33.1852.1 BUNDY, DOYLE 58.58 35.46 23.12 11/24/2000 35.00 - none 19.7150.2 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 101.88 65.32 36.56 10/18/2000 68.36 - 32.1546.4 BURCHFIELD, DARRELL 82.22 46.81 35.41 11/22/2000 33.11 - 31.3364.1 BURGESS, ALLEN 76.46 41.47 34.99 11/2212000 42.53 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent I ! CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 3 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:51 am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 69.0182.1 BURNS, DONALD 72.28 31.14 41.14 10/19/2000 58.59 - none 2.4890.2 BURNS, EMMETT 150.57 89.25 61.32 11/27/2000 148.47 - 42.2460.1 BURTON, JACK 92.73 48.99 43.74 11/28/2000 63.74 - none 50.1396.1 BUTTERFIELD, DENNIS 128.22 68.58 59.64 1 0/24/2000 65.4 7 - none 32.1452.1 BYRNE, JASON 59.81 35.46 24.35 11/21/2000 35.00 - none 21.0522.1 CALWELL, MARC 63.36 37.70 25.66 11/20/2000 25.00 - none 4.1988.2 CAMPBELL, DOUGLAS & ROBINE 153.61 74.23 71.08 8.30 1 0/25/2000 68.32 - 3.0048.2 CARLO, CHRISTA 79.14 52.76 26.38 11/22/2000 33.92 - 32.0884.1 CARLSON, DEBORAH J. 105.87 55.56 50.31 11/28/2000 54.16 - none 2.4590.1 CARNAHAN, JOHN 116.76 74.23 42.53 11/27/2000 41.46 - none 65.0688.1 CARPENTER, GAIL 80.55 46.59 33.96 10/25/2000 45.27 - none 2.4340.1 CARRIER, RICHARD 146.31 87.23 59.08 11/22/2000 48.01 - none 31.3394.1 CARROLL, PHILIP R. 90.03 45.72 44.31 11/20/2000 70.00 - none 3.4001.1 CASCADE BUILDERS 455.89 31.06 97.20 327.63 20.1282.2 CAUAGUN, C. & VERONICA 123.78 53.04 36.56 34.18 2.2596.2 CAUDILL, KEVIN 117.62 88.02 29.60 12/14/2000 43.94 - 54.0624.1 CESCO 521.82 310.56 211 .26 10/13/2000 206.46 - none 42.2582.1 CHAPMAN, LORRI 114.28 56.45 55.96 1.87 11/29/2000 53.58 - none 22.0848.1 CHAPMAN, THOMAS 222.4 7 65.18 157.29 11/29/2000 122.22 - none 21.2658.1 CHAPPELL, ANTHONY 132.17 46.45 70.72 15.00 1 2/05/2000 75.00 - none 19.1706.2 CHASE, NICHOLAS 109.50 70.54 38.96 10/13/2000 78.24 - 74.2850.1 CHEESBROUGH, JAMES G. 85.14 43.80 41.34 10/16/2000 68.08 - none 21.0218.1 CHEN, L1L1 & YIZE 99.58 61.45 38.13 12/15/2000 44.97 - none 65.0668.1 CHENEY, ELWOOD 59.24 32.86 26.38 11/13/2000 24.08 - none 2.6100.1 CHENEY, STEVEN 115.81 83.26 32.55 11/22/2000 35.05 - none 74.2532.2 CHILTON, BRYAN 112.64 46.56 66.08 11/29/2000 21 .40 - 46.0630.2 CHOW, PAUL 59.24 32.86 26.38 10/17/2000 24.08 - 34.1204.1 CHRISTOFFERSON, ANDREW 511.24 40.52 470.72 12/07/2000 75.00 - none 22.1486.1 CHURCHMAN, STEVE J. 94.36 55.34 39.02 1 0/25/2000 77.23 - none 51.3014.1 ClOP ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. 145.59 88.85 56.74 11/02/2000 118.02 - none 33.4344.1 CI RELLI, MARK 96.98 50.50 46.48 11/28/2000 56.48 - none 69.0302.1 CLASSIC HOMES 49.07 28.84 20.23 11/02/2000 33.92 - none 1.2020.1 CLEMENTS, ROBERT 96.88 60.42 36.46 11/24/2000 60.00 - none 21.0002.1 CLIFFORD, JOHN 79.99 35.24 44.75 11/14/2000 47.95 - none 74.2432.1 COFFEY, KENNETH & DONNA 85.09 33.96 51.13 11/06/2000 111.08 - none 21.1766.1 COFFMAN, RICK K. 123.93 65.82 58.11 11/27/2000 70.57 - none 22.1744.1 COLLINS, JENNIFER 72.93 32.86 40.07 10/20/2000 189.25 - 74.2350.3 COLLINS, LEONARD 69.59 34.18 35.41 10/13/2000 36.80 - 2.1650.1 COLLINS, TERRY 109.23 68.82 40.41 11/15/2000 40.00 - none 74.3650.2 COLSON, CHRIS 78.36 44.18 34.18 11/29/2000 36.80 - 74.3304.2 COMPARATO, BRYAN 104.00 36.28 36.28 31.44 09/13/2000 64.11 - 65.3144.1 COMPTON, NEIL 90.78 45.39 45.39 10/13/2000 84.44 - none 19.0138.1 CONRAD, ROSS 79.14 52.76 26.38 10/17/2000 48.16 - none 21.0022.1 CONRAD, STEVEN 117.45 58.89 58.56 11/27/2000 85.70 - none 5.0518.1 COOK, ROBERT 139.16 73.14 66.02 11/27/2000 93.24 - none 42.2992.1 COPE, TIMOTHY 69.08 39.01 30.07 10/17/2000 59.23 - none 4.0882.1 COPELAND, STEPHAN & JACKIE 100.37 69.01 31.36 1 0/20/2000 33.90 - none 2.1180.1 CORNISH, LAURA 115.93 79.43 36.50 11/21/2000 36.66 - none 20.1648.1 CORRIE, ROBERT 97.21 41.39 55.82 10/10/2000 63.28 - none 52.0170.1 CORYELL, EARL 59.24 32.86 26.38 10/13/2000 48.16 - none 2.3912.1 COUCH, DONALD & CAROL YN 84.20 57.82 26.38 11/02/2000 25.31 - none 31.3420.1 COUCH, JULIA 70.89 41.61 29.28 12/01/2000 55.00 - none 35.0182.2 COVINO, AMMON & CRYSTAL 77.30 43.12 34.18 10/23/2000 50.79 - 33.3592.1 CRADER, PAMELA 113.16 84.32 28.84 11/07/2000 31.46 - none 1.2820.1 CRIDLAND, DONALD 152.34 102.11 50.23 11/24/2000 58.92 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent J ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 4 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:51am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 32.1090.1 CRINER, LANCE & SHEILA 88.76 36.55 52.21 10/12/2000 151.48 - none 42.4070.1 CROSS, ARBY 72.61 35.24 37.37 11/28/2000 52.21 - none 5.0154.1 CROY, CLAUDE 125.83 57.79 68.04 11/01/2000 92.00 - none 21.1918.1 CULVER. JAMES 99.86 53.83 46.03 11/21/2000 58.00 - none 51.0998.1 CULVER, WALTER 1 04.91 61.15 43.76 1 0/20/2000 83.99 - none 74.3536.1 DAIL Y, ROBERT 78.04 37.79 40.25 11/27/2000 35.41 - none 20.1612.1 DALY, RON 64.00 35.24 28.76 11/07/2000 30.07 - none 22.1420.1 DAVENPORT. DUANE 74.12 40.30 33.82 11/27/2000 82.03 - none 69.1290.1 DAVID OVARD 73.94 34.18 33.28 6.48 09/13/2000 5.85- 22.0458.2 DEAL. JANET 106.94 54.11 52.83 11/15/2000 100.00 - 21.3070.1 DECK. KIMBERL Y 1 09.84 54.47 55.37 11/29/2000 77.30 - none 42.2346.1 DECORDOVA, WILLIAM 128.80 65.18 63.62 11/03/2000 105.52 - none 32.0902.3 DEEL, RICHARD 88.49 55.42 33.07 69,0704.1 DENNING, RICHARD & LORA 21 0.27 99.60 110.67 11/24/2000 95.99 - none 32.1254.1 DENNIS, LORI 74.84 40.66 34.18 1 0/23/2000 31.88 - none 2.1610.1 DESILET, DENICE 124.36 71.77 52.59 11/27/2000 50.00 - none 46.4956.1 DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED 316.02 158.01 112.65 45.36 12/05/2000 27.34 - 31.0812.1 DICK, JERALD & AUDRIA 119.79 55.56 49.08 15.15 11/22/2000 65.00 - none 50.0348.1 DICKMAN, RONALD 83.84 34.09 49.75 10/11/2000 150.25 - none 74.3820.2 DIMAYA. FEDELlNO 58.75 29.99 28.76 11/16/2000 26.38 - 74.2564.1 DIRKSEN. JENNIE 76.13 27.61 48.52 1 0/23/2000 50.89 - none 33.2584.1 DIXON. DAVID 77.20 41.75 35.27 .18 11/02/2000 34.02 - none 69.0490.1 DIXON, SCOTT & HEATHER 52.76 26.38 26.38 10/13/2000 52.71 - none 51.3930.3 DMK INVESTMENTS L.L.C. 196.89 40.66 47.87 52.95 55.41 09/21/2000 60.33 - 34.1690.1 DOCKWEILER, THOMAS & TERR 105.59 46.81 58.78 11/22/2000 71.24 - none 50.0200.1 DODGE, DOUGLAS 64.16 37.78 26.38 10/18/2000 25.31 - none 2.1560.1 DOMKA, DAVID 102.65 65.20 37.45 11/06/2000 68.36 - none 33.2594.2 DONALDSON, NEAL 73.10 40.30 32.80 11/28/2000 50.00 - 74.1062.1 DOTY, PAULINE & RON 57.13 27.98 29.15 11/27/2000 28.00 - none 4.2282.1 DRURY, PATRICK 1 71 .06 100.20 70.86 11/29/2000 104.15 - none 51.0698.2 DUEROCK, WALTER 252.56 32.86 27.61 24.08 168.01 04/10/2000 23.25 - 42.3106.1 DUNSTAN, JOAN 80.59 35.46 45.13 11/21/2000 55.32 - none 4.1958.1 DUPLEX, HARRY 184.88 1 05.94 78.94 11/20/2000 115.38 - none 34.0746.2 DUVALL, KENNETH 109.21 57.88 51.33 11/24/2000 75.00 - 74.3330.3 DUVALL, KENNETH 89.04 50.25 38.79 11/29/2000 36.80 - 5.0172.1 EARNHART, KATHLEEN 237.43 169.56 67.87 11/29/2000 85.17 - none 48.1t333.1 EDDY'S BAKERY 898.34 36.00 272.63 589.71 22.1422.1 EDaM, JOHN & ERIN 118.85 63.28 55.57 10/12/2000 64.26 - none 50.2302.1 ELICKER, TODD 105.79 5.43 10.00 33.31 57.05 08/10/2000 27.91 - none 72.0101.1 ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSO( 757.12 24.60 341 .1 0 354.72 36.70 09/19/2000 146.08 - none 68.0138.1 ELLINGTON, BRUCE 60.41 32.59 27.82 11/02/2000 32.67 - none 50.2232.1 ELLIS, JOHN 73.17 42.90 30.27 11/17/2000 35.27 - none 34.0592.1 ELLIS, TODD & DANA 157.90 102.49 55.41 11/29/2000 80.00 - none 15.0005.1 EMERALD HOMES 86.35 86.35 04/24/2000 24.99 - 15.0039.1 EMERALD HOMES 1 00.15 1 00.15 04/24/2000 2.68 - 15.0067.1 EMERALD HOMES 102.21 102.21 04/24/2000 6.48- 31.3062.2 EMERSON, DON 91.22 51.31 39.91 11/27/2000 44.99 - 2.0180.1 ENGLISH, RONDA 113.22 113.22 10/18/1999 32.69 - none 2.1940.1 EPLEY, RITA 76.83 52.76 24.07 11/14/2000 35.00 - none 50.1236.3 ERHART, MIL T 103.30 56.12 47.18 10/17/2000 52.26 - 50.1240.2 ERHART, MIL TON 87.30 51.73 35.57 11/28/2000 36.64 - 46.6000.1 ESI 647.64 383.28 264.36 10/25/2000 33.87 - 21.0134.1 ESPANA JR, FLORENTINO 63.38 35.24 28.14 1 0/18/2000 27.00 - none 31.0436.2 EVANS, KIM 143.89 80.72 63.17 11/27/2000 80.71 - 51.1295.1 FAMCO 76.14 34.02 42.12 11/21/2000 56.70 - *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent r ( ( { CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 5 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:51am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 51 .1294.1 FAMCO 594.06 357. 17 236.89 11/21/2000 263.38 - 46.4996.2 FAMOUS FOOTWEAR 332.78 307.56 25.22 12/01/2000 13.75 - 34.1806.1 FAULKNER,FREDA 141 .69 102.04 39.65 12/05/2000 87.00 - none 33.3678.1 FAYLOR, MILFORD 125.17 50.50 37.87 36.80 10/18/2000 36.80 - none 42.1840.1 FETTERS, CARMEN 57.96 32.86 25.10 11/13/2000 25.00 - none 31.3614.1 FICKES, MAURICE 175.31 49.36 125.95 11/27/2000 67.80 - none 68.0024.1 FIELD, BRUCE & MARCI 63.95 33.82 30.13 1 0/27/2000 32.67 - none 21.1896.3 FIELD, CHARLES 94.52 50.50 44.02 10/12/2000 54.02 - 69.0596.1 FIELDS, PETE M 120.35 54.56 63.17 2.62 11/20/2000 63.17 - none 33.3576.1 FIRST THINGS FIRST 383.44 219.56 163.88 11/27/2000 193.32 - none 34.2726.1 FIRST THINGS FIRST 359.28 204.94 154.34 11/27/2000 177.79 - none 74.1056.1 FISHER, SEA J. 51.84 26.38 25.46 11/27/2000 25.00 - none 22.1614.1 FISHER, DONALD H 118.29 68.32 28.76 21.21 10/16/2000 50.00 - none 2.0740.1 FISK, PATRICK 156.74 113.62 43.12 11/24/2000 50.00 - none 5.0800.1 FITZSIMMONS, TOM 1 21 .66 73.00 48.66 11/28/2000 63.58 - none 51.4210.2 FLATTEN, ROBERT 90.83 56.65 34.18 11/29/2000 42.22 - 74.3354.1 FLOREZ, BARRY 67.52 28.76 38.76 10/19/2000 55.22 - none 34.0860.1 FL YNN, BENJAMIN J 75.97 32.86 43.11 12/04/2000 75.00 - none 65.0616.1 FOGG, STACEY 70.06 43.12 26.94 11/24/2000 35.00 - none 21.1776.1 FOREMAN, EARL 100.27 55.22 45.05 12/01/2000 43.74 - none 34.2820.1 FRAHS, THOMAS 1 07.99 63.08 44.91 11/13/2000 50.00 - none 74.3626.1 FRANCIS JR, DAVID 57.52 28.76 28.76 1 0/13/2000 26.38 - none 2.5840.1 FRANK,GARY 152.16 107.35 44.81 11/29/2000 100.00 - none 31.3050.1 FRENCH,DEBRA 71.70 45.32 26.38 11/29/2000 31.46 - none 50.3754.1 FRENCH, LAWRENCE 182.97 36.55 43.60 57.29 45.53 11/22/2000 150.00 - none 72.0210.1 FRITZMEIER, RANDY 103.43 37.57 65.86 11/28/2000 90.79 - none 69.1246.1 FULLER, CHUCK 79.82 26.38 53.44 10/13/2000 105.26 - none 22.1184.1 GAILEY, ERON 106.94 59.17 47.77 10/17/2000 103.20 - none 32.0676.1 GAINOR, THOMAS & DIA 203.78 55.56 39.24 51.70 57.28 12/01/2000 50.00 - none 42.1138.2 GARDNER,BRENDON 100.67 60.42 40.25 11/29/2000 46.48 - 50. 1198.1 GARDOSKI, WILLIAM 62.93 32.86 30.07 11/24/2000 37.61 - none 69.0390.1 GARDUNO, DENNIS 82.17 42.93 39.24 11/28/2000 47.49 - none 21.0234.3 GARRETT, DAMON 131.82 74.07 57. 75 11/14/2000 61.52 - 20.1726.1 GARRIGUS, SCOTT 125.77 69.15 56.62 10/17/2000 150.00 - none 2.0950.1 GAYTHIWAITE, RITCHIE & SUSAI 123.17 69.31 53.86 11/27/2000 78.62 - none 2.2480.1 GILBERT, CARL 174.61 112.67 61.94 11/27/2000 75.63 - none 34.0394.1 GILBERTSON, KEVIN 95.75 48.04 47.71 10/13/2000 63.86 ~ none 35.0112.1 GLENN JOHNSON 73.94 40.66 33.28 1 0/24/2000 12.96 - 35.0119.1 GLENN JOHNSON 74.84 40.66 34.18 10/24/2000 32.17 - 35.1024.1 GLENN JOHNSON 74.84 40.66 34.18 10/24/2000 80.89 - 35. 1156.1 GLENN JOHNSON 74.84 40.66 34.18 10/24/2000 81.71 - 15.0013.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 50.29 30.29 20.00 15.0025.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 93.84 60.56 33.28 10/24/2000 9.41- 35.1018.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 74.84 40.66 34.18 10/24/2000 34.28 - 35.0139.1 GLENN JOHNSON HOMES 66.71 41.47 25.24 1 0/24/2000 26.51 - 4.2160.2 GLUMM, DENNIS 331 .41 117.03 214.38 1 0/24/2000 129.33 - 32.1528.1 GOINS, RICHARD 95.36 49.69 45.67 10/17/2000 39.68 - none 74.2574.2 GOSLIN, CRAIG 105.98 39.38 66.60 11/28/2000 67.83 - 22.1228.1 GOULD, TIM 107.61 57.66 49.95 10/06/2000 170.17 - none 34.2846.1 GOWEY, MICHAEL 82.61 37.78 44.83 11/20/2000 60.41 - none 14.5004.1 GRANDVIEW HOMES 106.74 56.28 26.38 24.08 10/18/2000 24.08 - 22.1224.1 GRASMICK, MAUREEN 71.54 32.86 38.68 11/02/2000 54.83 - none 32.1256.2 GRASS, JOYCE 67.13 46.81 20.32 11/16/2000 50.00 - 34.3206.1 GRAYSON, DIANA 121.97 74.68 47.29 10/24/2000 51 .14 - none 4.2352.1 GREAT CLIPS 1 01 .28 67.52 33.76 11/03/2000 33.76 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent /( I CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 6 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:51 am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 2.0926.1 GREEN, DAVID 79.14 52.76 26.38 10/12/2000 26.54 - none 51.3350.1 GREGORY, STEVEN 59.24 32.86 26.38 10/13/2000 48.16 - none 19.1086.1 GREMLlNG, PHILIP 142.22 93.22 49.00 10/16/2000 42.93 - none 74.1 046.1 GROOM, LEWIS W. 25.38 25.38 10/13/2000 22.88 - none 21.2712.2 GROSS, ROBERT 84.94 84.94' 20.2034.1 GROSSMAN, MICHAEL M. 120.52 46.73 53.78 20.01 11/28/2000 40.00 - none 69.0578.1 GROVES, DARRELL & NANCY 110.58 54.06 56.52 11/22/2000 72.59 - none 32.1168.1 GULBIS, ANTHONY 109.84 61.85 47.99 11/20/2000 52.29 - none 50.2378.1 GUTHMILLER, BRIAN A 150.49 80.33 70.16 11/27/2000 67.36 - none 42.2070.3 HADLEY, BRENT 99.44 46.81 52.63 42.2138.2 HADLEY, STEPHANIE 128.49 87.32 41.17 20.1478.2 HAKE,KAREN 86.98 47.96 39.02 11/03/2000 39.1 0 - 4.2144.1 HALDEN, DARYL 202.16 82.12 119.94 .10 11/27/2000 166.50 - none 4.2284.1 HALFPENNY, JAMES & MARLA S 115.09 59.05 56.04 1 0/25/2000 74.65 - none 4.1594.1 HALL, BRIAN 243.44 155.71 87.73 11/30/2000 77.00 - none 31.2300.1 HALLOCK, DOUGLAS S. 142.22 78.04 64.18 1 0/23/2000 79.02 - none 33.2338.1 HAMIL TON, TRACEY 200.21 71.97 54.42 54.58 19.24 11/14/2000 85.00 - none 1.0020.1 HAMMOND OD, THOMAS R 94.18 64.11 30.07 10/13/2000 47.45 - none 42.3732.1 HANDLEY, JEREMY 100.00 52.01 47.99 11/27/2000 53.60 - none 21.2074.2 HANFT, ROBERT 87.11 50.50 36.61 1 0/24/2000 29.00 - 74.2662.1 HANSEN, DAVID 109.11 37.87 71.24 11/28/2000 68.78 - none 42.1864.1 HARDEE, DAN & DEBBIE 86.70 40.44 46.26 1 0/24/2000 101.69 - none 42.2356.1 HARP, GREGORY 197.74 98.42 99.32 11/27/2000 142.45 - none 74.3528.1 HART, SHAWN 169.03 36.56 36.56 34.18 61.73 12/04/2000 20.00 - none 65.0276.1 HARTZ/MARTINDALE, SAM 59.24 32.86 26.38 11/09/2000 24.08 - none 21.0182.1 HARWOOD, WILLIAM & EMMA 1 04.43 48.69 55.74 11/15/2000 85.26 - none 40.0050.1 HAUSHEER, JAMES & CAROL 61.70 32.86 28.84 10/12/2000 26.54 - none 4.2140.1 HAYCOCK,ROBERT 128.34 56.45 71.89 10/10/2000 97.88 - none 40.0154.2 HAYDEN, MARK & THERESA 75.22 44.35 30.87 20.1308.1 HEATON CONSTRUCTION 112.49 50.66 34.18 27.65 09/14/2000 6.48- 64.4058.1 HEATON CONSTRUCTION 80.99 46.81 34.18 10/16/2000 31 .88 - 31.3494.1 HELZER, JANET 67.85 37.78 30.07 1 0/20/2000 43.76 - none 34.1542.1 HENRY, BRAD 75.21 42.98 32.23 11/24/2000 25.00 - none 69.0536.1 HEPLER, BENJAMIN & JUDY 94.98 46.26 48.72 11/15/2000 48.80 - none 2.0898.1 HEPPER, TED 493.61 322.97 170.64 1 0/24/2000 166.95 - none 74.0384.1 HESTER, LL YOD & SHERRY 61.05 31.58 29.4 7 12/01/2000 60.00 - none 31.0248.1 HEUGHINS, RUSSELL S. 92.22 56.81 35.41 11/29/2000 46.80 ~ none 32.0566.1 HICKS, BARBARA J 87.14 41.89 45.25 10/16/2000 60.17 - none 34.1870.2 HILL, RONIE & CARLA 108.89 54.11 54.78 11/20/2000 75.00 - 34.1892.1 HILLIARD, LANCE 83.73 44.49 39.24 1 0/23/2000 45.55 - none 34.1652.1 HOELZLE, G JEAN 82.61 32.86 49.75 10/12/2000 65.90 - none 20.1270.1 HOLLENBECK, KEITH 75.63 40.44 35.19 10/18/2000 34.04 - none 5.0722.1 HOLLEY, DAVID 185.38 125.52 59.86 11/29/2000 20.00 - none 32.1456.1 HOLLINGSHEAD, BRETT 90.33 45.30 45.03 11/27/2000 44.00 - none 2.2240.2 HOLLlSTER,MATT 121.26 98.58 22.68 11/13/2000 50.00 - 33.4346.1 HOLLOWAY, RON & PAIGE 116.84 37.78 79.06 11/24/2000 80.50 - none 35.5005.1 HOME BUILDER INC 84.77 46.73 38.04 10/16/2000 8.94 - 19.7130.1 HOME BUILDERS INC 99.66 66.85 32.81 10/17/2000 9.84 - 14.5012.1 HOME BUILDERS INC 79.14 52.76 26.38 08/11/2000 34.05 - 21.0536.1 HOOK, JAMES & CRYSTAL 97.41 55.48 41.93 11/24/2000 50.00 - none 74.1186.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 220.28 147.47 72.81 12/05/2000 77.92 - none 74.1146.1 HOPE ARMS APARTMENTS 1 ,153.25 704.77 448.48 12/05/2000 72.72 - none 52.1066.3 HOPKINS FARM LLC 446.09 271.80 174.29 1 0/25/2000 268.88 - 31.3606.3 HORTON, ROBERT 83.00 49.27 33.73 11/17/2000 25.00 - 74.3566.1 HOSKINS, BILL Y 57.52 28.76 28.76 1 0/24/2000 30.07 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( -- ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 7 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:51 am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 22.1722.1 HOWARD, FRANK 62.00 34.24 27.76 10/16/2000 25.18 - none 34.3337.1 HOWELL TRACT HOMEOWNER~ 719.28 77.76 641.52 11/02/2000 986.58 - none 32.0666.1 HOWELL, CHRIS & APRIL 64.84 40.66 24.18 11/20/2000 70.17 ~ none 1.0470.3 HOWELL, GAYLEEN 98.57 64.39 34.18 11/27/2000 31 .88 - 33.2652.1 HOWELL, KATHLEEN 89.32 47.90 41 .42 11/28/2000 46.50 - none 15.0068.1 HOYT DEVELOPMENT 127.94 61.88 34.18 31.88 09/12/2000 17.26 - 15.0071.1 HOYT DEVELOPMENT 1 20.87 61.88 34.18 18.33 6.48 3.0076.1 HUL TBERG, JEFFREY & ADRIA 82.97 56.59 26.38 11/01/2000 35.31 - none 69.1266.2 HUNT,CARL 116.17 53.78 62.39 10/13/2000 87.07 - 20.2054.1 HUTH, FREDRICK C. 124.94 83.38 41.56 11/20/2000 90.00 - none 33.3694.1 HUTTEBALL, CURTIS 56.94 32.86 24.08 11/27/2000 26.38 - none 21.0470.1 HYVONEN, CLARK 127.64 39.15 31.44 27.91 29.14 09/08/2000 99.28 - none 52.0978.1 IDAHO DEPT OF LAW 90.76 64.84 25.92 11/06/2000 25.92 - 52.0970.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 63.54 35.01 28.53 10/26/2000 28.53 - none 52.0950.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 195.48 140.30 55.18 10/26/2000 43.69 - none 52.0948.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 220.01 145.52 74.49 10/26/2000 59.17 - none 52.0946.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 346.33 229.87 116.46 10/26/2000 135.61 - none 52.0944.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 328.10 216.38 111.72 10/26/2000 130.87 - none 52.0954.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 170.22 103.39 66.83 10/26/2000 70.66 - none 52.0958.1 IDAHO DEPT. OF LAW ENFORCE 255.43 146.47 108.96 1 0/26/2000 135.77 - none 74.3336.1 ILG, KENNETH 88.16 44.08 44.08 11/20/2000 44.16 - none 49.1113.1 IVY HI-LIFT 58.32 1.62 56.70 10/18/2000 63.18 - none 2.5820.1 JACKSON, ROBERT 95.67 74.23 21.44 11/20/2000 40.00 - none 75.0003.1 JACKSON'S FOOD STORE #11 283.50 81.00 202.50 10/16/2000 414.72 - none 50.4506.1 JACOBSON, BETTY B. 59.24 32.86 26.38 11/20/2000 54.08 - none 2.2566.2 JAMES JOHNATAKIS 181.61 123.72 57.89 10/19/2000 135.78 - 32.0936.1 JARDINE, MICHAEL 132.26 75.52 56.74 10/17/2000 63.05 - none 1.1464.2 JELLlFFE, MARIA 289.32 211 .04 78.28 72.0272.1 JENSEN, BRAD 444.66 238.32 206.34 11/27/2000 243.32 - none 69.0678.1 JENSON, WILLIAM 67.05 31.44 35.61 11/27/2000 100.00 - none 21.2830.1 JESSEE, KEVIN 69.28 39.07 30.21 11/29/2000 31.36 - none 42.3060.1 JOHNSON, MATHEW 70.15 41.39 28.76 11/03/2000 26.38 - none 21.2226.1 JOHNSON, STEVE & RHONDA 85.47 47.82 37.65 11/07/2000 35.27 - none 32.0786.1 JOHNSTON, GENE R 119.24 64.09 55.15 1 0/24/2000 76.14 - none 22.0330.1 JONES, ELDON & LORI 184.15 91.99 92.16 12/04/2000 60.00 - none 22.1418.1 JONES, MICHELLE 81.50 47.68 33.82 10/20/2000 166.36 - none 31.2312.1 JONES,SUSAN 103.58 45.46 28.98 29.14 09/28/2000 48.82 - none 20.0112.1 JUDY, JEAN 131.82 56.85 74.97 11/17/2000 108.26 - none 50.3836.1 JULIAN, GEORGE 97.08 51.78 45.30 10/16/2000 110.08 - none 20.1932.1 JUSTICE, PAT 118.09 71.83 46.26 12/18/2000 40.00 - none 4.1874.1 JUUL, TOM 123.60 77.48 46.12 10/13/2000 51.44 - none 46.5010.1 KAISER ADVANCED TECHNOLOI 1,510.86 711.65 748.68 31.09 19.44 34.0812.1 KAUTZ, KARL & LORRAINE 124.76 55.70 69.06 11/20/2000 88.34 - none 35.0391.2 KEENEY, DARYL 93.13 55.34 37.79 10/12/2000 74.51 - 2.5080.2 KEENEY, DOLAN 143.33 90.70 52.63 1 0/24/2000 44.18 - 42.1930.1 KEGAN, ROSE MARIE 75.07 35.24 39.83 10/17/2000 121.64 - none 1.0870.1 KELLOGG, J.R. 89.31 52.70 26.38 10.23 12/14/2000 20.00 - none 21.2602.2 KEMNITZ, HEINO 143.56 61 .49 82.07 11/14/2000 100.60 - 21.2671.1 KENTFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASS 260.82 140.94 119.88 10/17/2000 176.58 - none 21.2709.1 KENTFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASS 202.50 71.28 131 .22 10/17/2000 150.66 - none 22.1356.1 KERBS, MARVIN L. 176.83 99.73 77.10 11/29/2000 122.61 - none 42.2530.1 KILER, KELLY & TAMMY 126.12 68.28 57.84 11/24/2000 61.00 - none 4.1614.1 KINCAID, GEORGE & LAURA 327.68 215.64 112.04 11/27/2000 112.12 - none 3.0298.1 KING, DAVID R 123.90 82.70 41.20 11/29/2000 69.57 - none 2.6520.1 KING, LOUIS J 38.07 6.48 31.59 10/06/2000 41.33 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent <- j ( ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 8 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:52am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 31.2982.1 KING, ROBERT & JUDY 1 09.1 7 59.67 49.50 10/13/2000 50.89 - none 21.2090.1 KINGSTON, CHRISTIE 89.44 47.96 41 .48 10/17/2000 64.93 - none 34.1544.1 KINGSTON, WILLIAM 67.66 42.68 24.98 11/01/2000 36.36 - none 50.1242.1 KINNEY, KEVIN B. 96.57 61.88 34.69 11/29/2000 40,00 - none 3.0024.1 KINNEY, KIMIKO 158.37 108.28 50.09 11/30/2000 50.34 - none 51.0466.1 KLINE, BEVERLY 76.58 37.84 38.74 1 0/27/2000 32.67 - none 4.2262.1 KREEGAR, KRISTOPHER 136.32 78.99 57.33 1 0/25/2000 67.65 - none 19.6642.1 KRENZ,ROY 139.21 66.41 72.80 11/09/2000 51.44 - none 46.0852.1 KRISHNEK, JOHN 65.23 35.24 29.99 10/13/2000 26.38 - none 31.0628.1 KYSAR, ANITA 189.08 139.72 49.36 11/29/2000 66.74 - none 69.0532.1 LAFEVER FAMIL Y TRUST 178.62 64.29 114.33 11/06/2000 93.82 - none 42.2550.1 LAMON, PAUL A. 88.76 32.86 55.90 10/16/2000 60.98 - none 4.1776.1 LANSING, BUD 191.41 104.45 80.98 5.98 11/29/2000 80.00 - none 33.0108.1 LARSON, TIMOTHY 55.99 55.99 05/19/2000 25.00 - none 31.0866.1 LARSON-POOLE, VICKEE K. 92.39 50.50 41.89 11/24/2000 50.00 - none 3.0272.2 LAUFENBERG, JAMES R 104.74 70.56 34.18 11/29/2000 40. 11 - 2.4990.1 LAUFENBERG, JIM & TAMMIE 251.25 104.45 73.28 56.06 17.46 12/18/2000 14.00 - none 51.0390.1 LAWSON, ROBERT 69.84 38.16 31.68 10/17/2000 31.28 - none 46.0816.1 LEATHAM, JARED 95.91 56.81 39.10 11/29/2000 36.80 - none 50.3818.1 LEE, JEROD 62.87 41.89 20.98 11/27/2000 50.00 - none 42.4046.1 LEMA, ADAM M. 133.92 6.48 33.61 93.83 08/18/2000 36.38 - none 43.0370.2 LEMAR, RICK & MELISSA 107.27 55.42 39.10 12.75 42.2736.1 LENAGHEN, CHRIS 60.97 39.07 21.90 11/27/2000 40.00 - none 31.3354.1 LEONARDSON, ELIZABETH 69.24 42.86 26.38 11/29/2000 24.08 - none 21.1480.2 LESTER,BETTE 137.30 63.28 74.02 11/27/2000 80.25 - 34.2852.1 LEVELL, SUZANNE 130.74 44.09 86.65 11/30/2000 141.77 - none 31.3382.1 LEVITT, MONTE 82.61 52.62 29.99 11/30/2000 55.23 - none 22.0328.1 LEWIS, JEFFREY 1 05.98 53.02 52.96 11/24/2000 60.00 - none 34.1754.1 LJEBERMAN, DAVID 97.74 54.19 43.55 11/27/2000 100.00 - none 22.0846.2 LINDSEY, HERBERT 142.00 71.47 70.53 11/13/2000 100.00 - 5.0796.1 LITTRELL, RICHARD 121.14 66.41 54.73 11/01/2000 65.88 - none 42.2520.1 LOCKYER, JEFFERY 148.64 57.94 90.70 10/25/2000 117.58 - none 4.1562.2 LONGSTREET,GARRET 123.33 75.62 47.71 11/29/2000 82.64 - 2.4270.1 LORD, LARRY R. 101 .58 57.82 43.76 11/21/2000 66.06 - none 40.0364.1 LOTHROP,ROBERT 84.28 41.61 42.67 11/24/2000 31.60 - none 21.0474.1 LOUIE, JONATHAN & NANCY 269.05 230.75 38.30 11/27/2000 164.44 - none 21.3134.1 LOVE, JAMES & ELIZABETH 172.01 67.72 104.29 11/28/2000 121.67 - none 42.2290.1 LOVE, JEFFREY 131.15 66.97 64.18 11/03/2000 95.01 - none 21.2636.1 LUCERO, ROBERT & TRACY 107.33 45.22 62.11 11/24/2000 80.64 - none 74.2840.1 MACHO, CRAIG & TAMMY 111.13 66.80 44.33 11/29/2000 50.00 - none 2.4480.1 MADRID, JOSEPH F 91.58 59.05 32.53 11/29/2000 62.37 - none 31.2210.1 MAGDUN. JOHN 71.82 40.38 31.44 10/24/2000 38.98 - none 5.0268.1 MANOS, PETER 518.74 111.95 94.79 124.39 187.61 11/16/2000 87.97 - none 74.2642:1 MANWARING. MARK 123.99 51 .46 72.53 11/01/2000 85.98 - none 42.1950.1 MARTIN, DANIEL K. 98.72 41.53 57.19 11/27/2000 63.42 - none 46.0174.1 MARTIN, MAYNARD 104.76 58.08 46.68 11/15/2000 46.50 - none 50.2198.1 MASON, DOUG 71.82 39.15 32.67 11/14/2000 31.25 - none 32.0802.1 MATHIEUS, MICHAEL 65.39 35.32 30.07 11/14/2000 40.07 - none 20.0086.1 MCARTHUR, DAVID & VICKIE 91.22 32.86 58.36 10/16/2000 72.05 - none 1.2050.1 MCBRIDE, D.B. 225.87 60.76 27.84 137.27 11/16/2000 169.00 - none 33.2266.1 MCBRIDE, KEVIN 151.24 112.31 38.93 11/22/2000 130.00 - none 42.2072.1 MCCLINTICK, TODD & LEISA 133.33 71.75 61.58 11/27/2000 77.65 - none 1.0170.2 MCCURDY, NATHAN 93.66 68.75 24.91 11/30/2000 53.76 - 2.2586.1 MCCURRY, ARTHUR 96.97 53.22 43.75 10/12/2000 58.36 - none 52.0310.1 MCDONALD'S 866.32 593.62 272.70 11/24/2000 498.69 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 9 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:52am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 3.0382.1 MCENROE, JOHN & AGATHA 177.22 102.11 75.11 11/15/2000 103.48 - none 1.0080.1 MCFADDEN, CLEORA 149.49 72.88 37.61 39.00 10/19/2000 43.76 - none 5.0644.1 MCFARLIN, TOM 117.30 93.22 24.08 11/22/2000 31.07 - none 68.0098.1 MCGILVERY, BELINDA 213.41 42.85 39.16 40.4 7 90.93 09/01/2000 60.00 - none 69.0714.1 MCGOURTY, MARY 75.63 42.57 33.06 11/20/2000 50.00 - none 31.3242.1 MCGOWAN, DAVID E. 95.4 7 51.59 43.88 11/27/2000 55.11 - none 21.0062.1 MCKAY, CINDY 100.95 46.95 54.00 11/22/2000 86.14 - none 34.1972.1 MCKEE, LESLI E 158.54 50.42 83.60 24.52 11/28/2000 73.60 - none 2.6270.2 MCKINLEY, JUNE 120.99 75.74 45.25 11/22/2000 55.25 - 74.1104.6 MCKINLEY, JUNE 135.06 46.64 46.48 41.94 34.1526.2 MCKINNEY, BERT 59.24 32.86 26.38 1 0/27/2000 24.08 - 46.0558.2 MCKNIGHT, DANIEL 67.68 34.09 33.59 1 0/25/2000 35.00 - 4.1386.1 MCQUIRK, LANCE 179.60 127.95 51.65 11/27/2000 85.04 - none 2.5590.1 MEDENA, RAYMOND 98.72 61.35 37.37 11/0212000 49.75 - none 69.2282.1 MEFFORD, CLI FFORD 174.99 72.12 102.87 10/26/2000 539.34 - none 34.0968.2 MEHOLCHICK. VICKY 105.47 68.06 37.41 11/06/2000 100.00 - 1.2730.1 MELLEN, ANGELA 139.87 96.95 42.92 11/29/2000 55.00 - none 21.1132.1 MEL TON, GARY 115.15 50.28 64.87 11/27/2000 119.07 - none 21.2754.1 MEL TON, GARY 96.82 54.11 42.71 10/19/2000 86.60 - none 52.1100.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 1,616.99 23.36 860.47 432.86 300.30 09/25/2000 725.50 - none 52.1090.1 MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY 6,658.69 528.92 3,808.74 1,229.86 1 ,091 .1 7 09/25/2000 1,711.33 - none 21.0094.1 METIVIER, JAMES 80.21 50.28 29.93 11/29/2000 40.00 - none 33.7616.1 MICHAELSON, B~DLEY 93.97 47.15 46.82 11/01/2000 72.65 - none 74.3696.1 MILLER, GREGORY & ERICA 71.64 36.64 35.00 11/27/2000 40.00 - 3.0102.1 MILLER, KENT & JENNIFER 1 04.20 67.78 36.42 1 0/20/2000 38.96 - none 34.1964.2 MILLER, RICKEY 94.80 48.18 46.62 11/24/2000 49.86 - 46.0886.1 MINEGAR, JOHN 63.97 35.24 28.73 11/17/2000 25.04 - none 32.1732.2 MOIR, MICHAEL 96.42 41.61 54.81 10/18/2000 72,19 - 20.1652.2 MOLEBASH, JOHN & MONICA 143.72 81.25 62.47 10/24/2000 17.01 - 34.0904.2 MOLENAAR, DIANA 423.40 58.97 42.65 53.88 267.90 09/15/2000 174.42 - 33.2542.1 MONROE, TIMOTHY & CARLA 148.61 51.75 34.04 62.82 10/0212000 40.00 - none 34.1540.1 MONTE FERRANTE, MICHELLE 63.16 35.32 27.61 .23 11/17/2000 30.00 - none 46.0222.1 MOORE, KEVIN & LISA 87.10 49.27 37.83 11/27/2000 60.00 - none 42.1990.2 MOORE, LARRY 256.27 94.78 161.49 11/27/2000 80. 00 ~ 20.1886.1 MOORE, VERN 73.51 45.53 27.98 10/20/2000 26.71 - none 51.3104.1 MOREDA. ANTHONY 69.43 43.57 25.86 12/01/2000 41.16 - none 2.1290.2 MORGAN, DANIEL 135.37 82.82 52.55 10/20/2000 159.54 - 20.1840.1 MORIN, MARY 154.24 70.52 83.72 1 0/24/2000 76.42 - none 50.4296.1 MORRIS, COLE & TRAVIS 161.33 94.36 66.97 10/17/2000 167.4 7 - none 74.2496.1 MORRIS, ROCKY 101.76 42.85 56.38 2.53 11/21/2000 59.66 ~ none 31.0184.1 MORRISON, BRYANT 74.84 40.66 34.18 11/01/2000 33.11 - none 2.5630.1 MORRISON, DWAYNE 220.40 136.60 83.80 11/24/2000 103.64 - none 2.0526.1 MOSSI, DAVID L 180.23 143.17 37.06 12/18/2000 82.32 - none 50.4016.2 MOULTON. CHAD 73.84 42.62 31.22 10/17/2000 92.12 - 34.0500.1 MOURITSEN, LAYNE 129.24 58.02 71.22 11/27/2000 119.51 - none 4.1804.1 MURPHY, WILLIAM 129. 13 81.61 45.03 2.49 12/ 18/2000 60.00 - none 21 .1 068.1 MURRAY, JOHN 82.92 46.67 36.25 11/28/2000 103.33 - none 20.1288.1 MUSGRAVE, JOHN C. 38.36 6.48 31.88 10/18/2000 24.08 - none 69.0948.1 MUSSELL, PAUL 72.44 30.07 42.37 10/12/2000 108.95 - 74.2592.1 MYERS, BRENT & LINDA 88.16 40.39 47.77 10/12/2000 71.22 - none 3.0808.1 NASADOS, JAMES 154.54 111.83 42.71 11/29/2000 45.25 - none 14.5037.2 NASH, TIERA 1 03. 11 65.32 37.79 11/28/2000 40.33 - 42.3088.2 NASH, TIM & JOCELYN 77.30 43.12 34.18 10/24/2000 34.34 - 20.1692.2 NEEDS,STEVEN 136.22 71.35 64.87 11/30/2000 53.72 - 2.3280.1 NEHER, CHARLES 99.52 70.54 28.98 10/20/2000 27.91 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent } ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 10 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:52am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 68.0086.1 NEITZEL, KENNETH & HEIDI 102.13 46.68 55.45 10/19/2000 87.37 - none 69.0600.1 NELSON, MARK & GLENDA 113.66 47.77 65.89 11/22/2000 90.00 - none 20.1744.1 NEMEC, ROBERT 85.75 46.73 39.02 11/13/2000 39.10 - none 51.4110.2 NESMITH, STEVE 117.89 78.79 39.10 11/27/2000 33.11 - 31.0726.1 NITZ, JASON 128.31 34.09 94.22 10/25/2000 91.53 - none 22.1638.1 NORTHAM, JACQUE 70.15 35.24 34.91 10/25/2000 49.75 - none 50.1460.1 NORTHVIEW BUSINESS CENTEF 271.34 93.44 57.58 69.68 50.64 06/20/2000 69.68 - none 42.0701.1 OAKBROOK PLAZA 937.98 301.32 617.22 19.44 35.0221.1 OASIS CONSTRUCTION 89.60 49.27 40.33 11/06/2000 17.19 - 2.1530.1 OBENCHAIN, JAIME 139.27 101 .06 38.21 11/30/2000 65.00 - none 20.1396.1 OGLESBEE, DAVID & MARITA 124.20 63.22 60.98 11/27/2000 64.00 - none 33.4516.1 OKE, DARREN & PAMELA 101.90 52.96 48.94 10/24/2000 55.25 - none 72.0174.1 O'LEARY, LORI 159.41 38.76 54.75 65.90 10/20/2000 61.38 - none 3.0402.1 OLSEN, MARY ANN 113.34 69.82 43.52 11/01/2000 58.36 - none 43.2450.2 ORGILL, BRIAN 74.84 40.66 34.18 46.0334.1 ORR, KIRT 84.24 47.82 36.42 10/17/2000 34.04 - none 21.2744.1 ORTON, JOHN & LARAINE 97.21 46.31 50.90 11/20/2000 54.67 - none 51.3430.1 OVERTON, DAVID C 123.55 37.92 38.82 46.81 12/18/2000 30.00 - none 13.2094.2 OVERY,ROBBY 285.43 69.31 31.44 31.60 153.08 33.2320.2 OZUNA, MARIO 82.71 59.27 23.44 11/29/2000 50.00 - 22.0454.1 P. JANSSON, JANIE 121.58 69.03 52.55 11/29/2000 71.24 - none 65.3148.1 PAFFUMI, ANGIE 74.06 37.65 36.41 10/16/2000 80.00 - none 69.0466.1 PAGE, CHARLES & LORIE ANN 102.48 60.77 41.71 12/01/2000 25.00 - none 21.2230.1 PAGE,L1NDA 81.22 52.46 28.76 11/27/2000 30.07 - none 69.0284.1 PALMER, JOE 107.17 54.20 52.97 10/16/2000 107.33 - none 32.0638.2 PALMER, PAT 127.24 63.89 54.95 8.40 12/14/2000 50.00 ~ 31.3280.1 PALMER, PAT 198.85 122.96 75.89 11/27/2000 82.20 - none 33.2272.1 PANKEY, CHARLIE 78.25 44.21 34.04 11/15/2000 32.97 - none 21.0114.1 PARKE, KIRBY 141.55 79.55 62.00 11/01/2000 63.31 - none 21.3011.1 PARKWOOD MEADOWS HOMEC 200.16 126.98 73.18 11/02/2000 432.54 - none 64.3050.1 PARRISH, MARTIN 94.57 54.33 39.24 1.00 11/01/2000 39.63 - none 74.3044.1 PARRISH, STEVE 80.50 40.25 40.25 11/20/2000 39.10 - none 74.3970.1 PATE, ERIC & LINDA 57.52 28.76 28.76 10/18/2000 53.99 - none 2.2490.2 PATTERSON, DEENA L 96.64 62.88 33.76 10/17/2000 33.91 - 74.3356.1 PAYNE,STEPHEN 61.21 32.45 28.76 10/25/2000 26.38 - none 2.0120.1 PEABODY, ELLA 95.29 61.02 34.27 10/18/2000 34.23 - none 15.0048.2 PEBBLES-KORBER, GAIL 96.92 64.11 32.81 1 0/20/2000 30.31 - 46.0800.1 PEDERSON, DOUGLAS 76.58 40.30 36.28 10/24/2000 31.44 - none 33.3638.1 PERALTA, EDWARD 71.54 43.93 27.61 11/01/2000 29.00 - none 21.3160.1 PETERSEN, DOUGLAS & JENNIF 145.89 57.82 88.07 11/29/2000 100.46 - none 42.2562.1 PETERSON, PAUL & KARISSA 83.71 46.59 37.12 12/15/2000 32.00 - none 21.0556.1 PFEIFFER, HARRY & MAUREEN 69.20 37.84 31.36 1 0/25/2000 31 ,44 ~ none 74.3000.1 PHILLIPS, RICHARD 94.07 46.42 47.65 11/29/2000 38.08 - none 42.1208.1 PHIMMASONE, PHETMALEY 71.38 40.16 31.22 10/13/2000 31.30 - none 31.0776.1 PIEPMEYER, THOMAS 149.90 50.24 31.30 68.36 10/17/2000 90.50 - none 19.7400.1 PINNACLE HOMES 115.71 79.15 36.56 11/29/2000 40.33 - none 42.0348.1 PIPAL, RANDALL & JULIE 88,88 52.60 36.28 10/23/2000 28.98 - none 32.1590.1 PISCHEL, DEBORAH 81.94 47.90 34.04 11/06/2000 34.20 - none 19.6644.1 PLACE, WILLIAM 91 .48 60.12 31.36 11/27/2000 28.98 ~ none 4.1412.1 PLUMLEY, RODNEY & M. NAOMI 124.97 65.18 59.79 11/28/2000 . 64.79 - none 21.1942.1 POOL, JAMES H. 132.38 71.89 60.49 11/27/2000 88.86 - none 32.1412.1 PORETT, GARY 79.48 42.98 36.50 11/13/2000 46.50 - none 69.0522.1 PORTER, DOUGLAS 73.84 32.67 41.17 10/17/2000 60.00 - none 4.1786.1 POWELL, JON 201 .14 70.10 52.27 78.77 10/13/2000 80.00 - none 50.2402.1 POWELL, RANDY 113.04 65.68 47.36 11/24/2000 45.00 - none ,....... in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( I { CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 11 Standard Payment Customers Dec 19,2000 08:53am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 51.0854.2 POYSER,MORGAN 171.53 111.29 60.24 11/22/2000 51 .63 - 4.1886.1 PRESCOTT,RANDY 156.99 91.85 65.14 11/27/2000 60.00 - none 34.1940.2 PRESLEY, TROY & ALLISON 94.40 44.35 50.05 11/14/2000 52.00 - 7.0248.1 PRICE, RICHARD 1 09.26 71.61 37.65 10/17/2000 34.31 - none 74.3418.2 PRINDLE, SHELL Y 73.20 37.79 35.41 11/27/2000 48.03 - 21.1828.2 PRINTZ, DENIA 1 00.56 53.52 47.04 11/27/2000 60.73 - 31.3298.2 PROUD, DORTHY 74.84 40.66 34.18 1 0/27/2000 31.88 - 21.0214.1 PRYOR, WILLIAM 413.81 218.14 195.67 11/27/2000 251.93 - none 4.1952.1 PRYOR, WILLIAM & LOUISE 441 .84 272.49 169.35 11/27/2000 211.25 - none 34.1172.1 QUARNBERG, CARL & DOROTH' 121.31 77.17 44.14 11/29/2000 100.00 - none 46.0322.1 QUATTLEBAUM, JAMES & BARB, 156.21 63.44 46.96 45.81 10/02/2000 65.49 - none 2.5670.1 RANSOM, JAMES R. 125.29 95.98 29.31 12/04/2000 50.00 - none 46.0864.1 RASMUSSEN,RONALD 84.24 45.36 38.88 11/27/2000 46.50 - none 2.2820.1 RAUSCH, DAVID 1 29.50 85.56 43.94 10/17/2000 42.79 - none 35.1206.1 RAY & TARA BOLINGER 75.10 43.12 31.98 72.0216.1 REAMAN, JOHN 96.77 49.00 47.77 11/13/2000 51.54 - none 42.1884.1 RECORD,CLAYTON3RD 128.55 35.32 27.15 66.08 09/15/2000 90.00 - none 20.0210.1 REED,RON 91.11 51.87 39.24 10/16/2000 121.85- 2.2160.1 REEVES,GARY 109.50 69.31 40.19 11/27/2000 46.50 - none 35.0070.1 RENWOOD HOMES 85.75 47.96 37.79 10/16/2000 40.33 - 21.2918.1 REYES, DAVID & KAREN 118.96 56.57 62.39 10/11/2000 124.07 - none 32.1694.1 RICE, E. DONALD 119.91 58.30 61.61 11/27/2000 100.00 ~ none 19.0840.1 RICHARDS HOMES 94.74 60.56 34.18 11/01/2000 31 .88 - 34.1694.1 RIDGEWAY, STEPHAN 133.49 64.45 69.04 11/24/2000 79.04 - none 22.0880.1 RIETH, KEVIN F. 141.07 60.54 80.53 11/24/2000 113.00 - none 4.1838.1 RIGGS, ROBERT 127.76 74.21 53.55 11/20/2000 75.00 - none 34.0786.1 RILEY, MARK 154.68 80.58 74.10 11/27/2000 74.26 - none 42.2514.1 RIMMER, NICOLA 80.15 35.32 44.83 10/17/2000 54.83 - none 42.1844.1 RIVERA, REGENA 139. 1 6 59.05 80.11 11/29/2000 114.10 - none 21.0492.1 ROBERTS, CHARLES 67.03 40.16 26.87 11/22/2000 27.00 - none 50.2106.1 ROBINSON, RICHARD & PRISCIL 110.16 71.04 39.12 11/29/2000 100.00 - none 2.5170.1 RODRIGUEZ, JILL 127.32 102.13 25.19 12/13/2000 50.00 - none 69.1614.1 ROHM, FRANK 121.96 88.00 33.96 10/25/2000 34.04 - none 21.2006.1 ROSE, MARK & TAMARA 98.77 55.70 43.07 11/22/2000 42.00 - none 1.4430.1 ROWLEY, HELEN 95.04 63.36 31.68 10/24/2000 31.28 - none 52.0316.1 RT NAHAS CO 682.55 434.55 248.00 11/27/2000 388.24 - none 65.0318.1 RUPPERT, RONNIE 65.23 36.47 28.76 11/21/2000 28.84 - none 2.3180.1 RYAN, WAL TER 1 09.73 62.76 46.97 11/29/2000 85.00 - none 74.3710.1 SANDOVAL, WALTER & mlREYA 76.07 35.41 40.66 09/27/2000 7.71 - 34.1078.2 SAVELBERG, DOYLE 124.14 58.85 38.84 26.45 10/19/2000 50.00 - 32.1642.1 SCHMIT, JAMES 80.71 45.44 35.27 11/15/2000 31.74 - none 42.3050.1 SCHOLZ, LESLIE 92.4 7 50.42 42.05 11/27/2000 51.00 - none 31.3018.2 SCHUSTER, FORREST & DEBBIE 94.52 52.96 41.56 12/05/2000 71.24 - 3.0042.1 SCHWEND, LUVMINDA 146.86 93.66 52.91 .29 11/15/2000 70.00 - none 1.2260.1 SCOTT, DAVID 134.46 32.86 26.38 33.92 41.30 09/21/2000 93.83 - none 1.1915.1 SEABURY 316.18 63.18 167.14 46.98 38.88 08/24/2000 52.78 - 32.1346.1 SEBYAKIN, ANTHONY A 130.91 69.23 61.68 10/19/2000 107.37 - none 69.2262.1 SEDILLO, JOE 220.49 92.41 128.08 11/27/2000 149.15 - none 3.0832.1 SEVERSON,DENA 1 01.20 57.52 43.68 10/20/2000 58.91 - none 14.5011.1 SHADOW MOUNTAIN CONSTRUI 80.37 53.99 26.38 10/17/2000 24.08 - 2.2930.1 SHARP, LEE 76.14 50.76 25.38 10/04/2000 24.11 - none 31.0158.1 SHARP, MARIETTA D. 99.32 52.82 46,50 10/19/2000 79.63 - none 34.1022,1 SHAW, DANIEL 1 08.44 53.77 54.67 11/28/2000 110.18 - none 74.0322.2 SHELDON, PAM 86.76 36.64 34.18 15.94 74.3242,1 SHEL TROWN, ROGER 81.73 41.48 40.25 11/03/2000 39,1 0 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent (' CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 12 Standard Payment Customers Dee 19,2000 08:53am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 74.3960.1 SHERARD, BILL 88.65 57.91 30.74 11/29/2000 75.00 - none 74.2758.1 SHIELDS, JOHNNY 151.01 49.16 46.62 55.23 09/19/2000 88.03 - none 34.0724.2 SILCOX, BENJAMIN 392.17 59.92 332.25 1 0/30/2000 164.77 - 22.0854.1 SILLBAUGH, DAVID & NORMA 140.32 72.17 68.15 11/03/2000 112.51 - none 4.1632.1 SIMMONS, JOHN & JANA 125.11 76.53 48.58 11/17/2000 67.11 - none 21.2836.2 SINGLETON, RODNEY 88.19 57.88 30.31 12/01/2000 60,00 - 34.0436.1 SKEL TON, RANDY 136.60 45.94 46.12 44.54 10/17/2000 70.00 - none 2.1200.1 SMART, B & K STEWART 134.31 90.92 43.39 11/24/2000 66.00 - none 31.0134.1 SMITH, BRADLEY 117.22 69.23 47.99 11/20/2000 61.55 - none 21.3010.1 SMITH, BRYAN 68.84 35.32 31.22 2.30 10/17/2000 40.07 - none 42.0430.1 SMITH, JEANETTE 59.24 32.86 26.38 10/17/2000 55.54 - none 74.2824.1 SMITH, JEROMY 54.74 32.59 22.15 11/14/2000 70.00 ~ none 4.0532.1 SMITH, JOHN 111.30 76.39 34.91 10/17/2000 56.45 ~ none 74.3176.2 SMITH, LANCE & TAMARA 74.99 37.87 36.64 .48 2.1700.2 SMITH, LEON & JANICE 68.85 44.26 24.59 11/02/2000 13.68 - 50.0012.1 SMITH, PAUL H. 102.38 64.73 37.65 11/27/2000 40,00 - none 43.2426.3 SMITH, RANDALL 74.84 40.66 34.18 50.0146.2 SMITH, RON 78.53 44.35 34.18 11/20/2000 31.88 - 50.0152.2 SMITH, RON 66.46 37.70 28.76 11/28/2000 27.61 - 2,6170.1 SMITH, SHANE 166.58 103.06 63.52 10/13/2000 59.57 - none 20.1664.2 SMITH, T & MEDLEY, T 49.73 44.19 5.54 09/14/2000 119.18- 34.0726.2 SOMSEN, GAYLENE 83.45 45.58 37.87 11/27/2000 47.87 - 32.1576.1 SON, SHELLlE 64.65 32.86 26.38 5.41 11/20/2000 20.00 - none 32.1078.1 SORELLE, MAURICE & NELLIE 113.42 56.26 57.16 1 0/13/2000 208.12 - none 2.0900.2 SOUZA, JR., WILLIAM 81.90 57.82 24.08 11/28/2000 26.38 - 2.3430.1 SPEARS, BRYCE J. 204.48 89.55 61.38 53.55 11/20/2000 70.00 - none 20.2999.1 SPRINKLER - BRENDA ESTATES 68.32 27.82 11.34 12.96 16.20 34.1166.1 STAFFORD, FRITZ 171.06 70.32 100.74 11/24/2000 33.21 - none 74.1118.1 STAHL, VIRGINIA 50.76 25.38 25.38 11/20/2000 22.88 - none 2.4520.2 STEBBINS, JODIE 150.83 99.95 50.88 11/17/2000 55.00 - 19.0340.2 STEENBAKKERS, JOHN 106.66 75.30 31.36 11/01/2000 31.44 - 22.1048.1 STEINER, THURSTON 356.81 78.71 80.84 109.21 88.05 10/26/2000 57.00 - none 51.3280.1 STENSON, VIRGINIA 305.59 305.59 none 31.0190.1 STEPHEN, BRET & DEBORAH 82.22 45.58 36.64 10/16/2000 35.57 - none 33.0221.1 STEVENSON, IRIS 33.23 6.85 26.38 10/10/2000 24.13 - none 2.5400.1 STEVENSON, MICHAEL 106.90 65.48 41 .42 11/24/2000 51.42 - none 74.2844.1 STEWART, DANIEL 100.74 51.60 49.14 11/21/2000 46.76 - none 34.1778.1 STEWART, RICK D. 113.25 51.87 61.38 11/22/2000 71.38 - none 31.3414.1 STINGER, KAREN 61.03 4.26 24.08 32.69 09/19/2000 36.38 - none 34.1800.1 STONER, JERRY 86.34 44.35 41.99 12/13/2000 50.00 - none 51.0988.7 STRATE, EUGENE 73.03 31.07 28.28 13.68 65.0380.1 SUTHERLAND, TED 92.44 56.85 35.59 1 0/26/2000 50.00 ~ none 46.0628.1 SWARTZ, GUY 64.00 35.24 28.76 11/13/2000 26.38 - none 31 . 1 006.1 SWEAT, STEVEN M. 82.73 41.53 41.20 10/12/2000 123.15 - none 74.2346.1 SWEET, WILLIAM 34.09 6.48 27.61 10/12/2000 25.31 - none 50.1686.3 TAVARES, MARVIN 78.53 43.12 35.41 11/06/2000 33.11 - 74.2698.2 TAYLOR, DARRELL 68.36 34.18 34.18 1 0/18/2000 63.76 - 3.0418.1 TEAGUE, RON & JANET 94.74 60.56 34.18 11/20/2000 41.56 - none 31.2314,2 TEIXEIRA, MICHELLE 65.39 32.86 32.53 11/13/2000 51.14- 33.0056.1 TEL-CAR INC. 198.49 91.74 106.75 10/19/2000 614.95 - none 34.0688.1 TEMPLIN, CLARISA 128.16 10.00 14.77 31.15 72.24 06/22/2000 96.29 - none 69.0140.1 TENNYSON, OWEN 74.07 37.65 36.42 10/17/2000 68.08 - none 3.9836.2 TERRACE PLAZA L.L.C. 530.09 373.82 156.27 11/02/2000 157. 17 - 3.9837.2 TERRACE PLAZA L.L.C. 121.50 27.54 93.96 10/24/2000 110. 16 - 2.1930.1 TERRY, TIMOTHY 174.99 30.21 144.78 10/01/1999 82.59 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent f } f \ I CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 13 Standard Payment Customers Oec 19,2000 08:53am Current Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 10/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 74.1114.1 THATCHER, TIMOTHY 179.82 55.39 57.85 66.58 1 0/20/2000 51.00 - none 1.3490.1 THIEMANN, ERIC 129,62 79.43 50.19 11/27/2000 34.20 - none 32.1558.2 THOMPSON, GARY 93.57 51.87 41.70 11/22/2000 76.34 - 1.1560.1 THORNE, JANET & DANA THOR~ 237.23 194.24 42.99 11/28/2000 26.38 - none 3.0420.1 THURBER, RICHARD 134.00 84.05 49.95 10/13/2000 137.12 - none 21.2768.2 THURBER, RICHARD 129.64 52.88 52.55 24.21 12/01/2000 52.55 - 21 .2732,3 THURBER,RONALD 362.96 46.73 73.46 141.19 101.58 11/29/2000 200.00 - 31.2234.1 TILDEN, R JASON 59.24 32.86 26.38 10/25/2000 38.84 - none 50.1 301 .1 TIM MUSSELL 33.30 11.65 21.65 1 0/24/2000 235,91 - 69.0226.1 TIMA, KAREN 98.28 49.14 49.14 11/28/2000 65.53 - none 2.4800.1 TODD, JUDY L. 98.59 57.52 41.06 .01 11/14/2000 64.00 - none 2.2200.3 TODD, RICK 79.14 52.76 26.38 11/27/2000 24.08 - 40.0250.1 TOMICH, LONNY 70.38 41.75 28.63 11/27/2000 35.00 - none 42.2608.1 TONEY, RICHARD & ROBIN 86.20 63.67 22.53 11/22/2000 50.00 - none 50.4022.2 TORGESON,MATTHEW 106.74 42.98 63.76 12/15/2000 50.00 - 20.1382.1 TOWERY, JEFFREY AND CHERY 129.64 64.37 65.27 11/09/2000 71.50 - none 31.0578.1 TRINIDAD, DAN 80.15 32.86 47.29 10/11/2000 163.78 - none 14.5006.1 TURNER,DAVE 144.40 93.08 51.32 11/02/2000 51 .40 ~ 2.0330.1 TURNER, DAVID & JEANINE 128.53 85.74 42.79 11/30/2000 45.41 - none 21.1174.1 TWADDLE, DAVID 116.11 56.99 59.12 11/22/2000 57.97 ~ none 34.2104.1 TYLER, HEIDI 82.22 46.81 35.41 11/27/2000 59.10 - none 74.2876.1 USSERY, TRACY 131.54 60.77 60.77 10.00 11/27/2000 59.62 - none 51.2996.1 VALLA, CAROL YN 394.06 10.00 31.15 352.91 07/11/2000 24.08 - none 22.0192.2 VAN BLANKENSTEIN, IAN 79.19 44.27 34.92 11/27/2000 .82 - 4.2350.1 VIDEOLAND # 168 156.46 67.52 33.76 33.76 21.42 12/07/2000 33.76 - none 5.0696.1 VIGIL, THOMAS 266. 15 228.64 37.51 11/03/2000 88.34 - none 2.4550.1 VINCENT, TOMMY 111.68 64.25 47.43 11/27/2000 63.58 - none 4.1977.1 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS AS~ 184.96 40.50 144.46 11/21/2000 234.90 - none 4.2189.1 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS AS~ 163.90 32.40 131.50 11/21/2000 220.32 - none 4.1899.1 VINEYARDS HOMEOWNERS AS~ 397.18 105.30 291.88 11/21/2000 539.46 - none 50.3742.2 VNUK, JOHN 156.07 92.60 63.47 10/20/2000 268.77 - 31.3556.1 VOGT, STELLA 152.25 67.64 84.61 11/27/2000 88.22 - none 14.5007.1 VREELAND CO 93.84 60.56 33.28 10/16/2000 6.48- 19.0354.1 VREELAND CO 237.60 98.42 129.23 9.95 10/16/2000 100.00 - none 21.2164.3 WAGONER, GLEN & MARY 287.33 216.46 53.86 17.01 33.4518.1 WALBRIDGE, RAYMOND 185.68 185.68 05/01/2000 151.93 - none 34.0002.1 WALGREENS 414.22 311.81 50.57 25.92 25.92 1.2310.2 WALKER, BETTE 236.26 160.51 75.75 11/22/2000 76.90 - 2.5730.2 WALKER, BRYCE 126.20 89.55 36.65 11/20/2000 70.00 - 34.2734.1 WALL, MIKE 69.64 38.06 31.58 10/17/2000 61.02 - none 33.3682.1 WALLACE, CRYSTAL 65.67 36.69 28.98 11/24/2000 30.37 - none 46.6002.1 W ALMART 163.05 129.60 33.45 32.1306.2 WALSH, DAVID & CARA 85.75 47.96 37.79 11/24/2000 37.87 - 1.3340,1 WALSH, RON 165.69 165.69 10/15/1999 191.33 - ***none 4.2132.1 WALSTON, DOUGLAS 180.02 61.21 60.74 58.07 12/05/2000 94.42 - none 33.3648.2 WARDLE, JOHN 125.87 60.50 65.37 11/29/2000 112.00- 19.0320.1 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK 79.14 52.76 26.38 10/23/2000 24.08 - none 21.2714.1 WATERMAN, LORI 122.01 72.86 49.15 11/29/2000 70.00 - none 32.0440.1 WATSON, BRAD 81.94 45.44 36.50 10/17/2000 45.27 - none 74.3052.1 WATSON, JASON 107.56 45.17 62.39 11/24/2000 53.86 - none 31.2230.1 WATTERS, TAMI 75.23 36.47 38.76 11/21/2000 32.53 - none 69.0446.1 WATTS,DARIK 103.48 52.97 50.51 11/20/2000 46.90 - none 33.3654.1 WATTS, WESLEY 62.93 36.55 26.38 10/25/2000 24.08 - none 33.4266.1 WEEK, NORMAN 127.90 74.57 53.33 11/22/2000 54.28 - none 22.1238.1 WEISS, DAVID M. 149.27 71.61 77.66 11/21/2000 88.00 - none *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent CITY OF MERIDIAN Delinquent Account List- council Page: 14 Standard Payment Customers Oec 19,2000 08:53am Cu ITent Period: 12/31/2000 Delinquent Minimum of $ 20.00 compared to Delinquent Balance Last Pmt Last Pmt Cust No Name Balance Non-Delinq 1 0/31/2000 09/30/2000 08/31/2000 Date Amount Msg 21.1968.3 WELDIN, TAMMY R 78.24 54.27 23.97 12/01/2000 48.00 - 2.3150.3 WELKER, ROGER 172.67 74.37 98.30 12/01/2000 94.61 - 3.9869.1 WENDELL & KASHA LAWRENCE 437.96 68.32 159.04 21 0.60 1 0/30/2000 383.94 - 22.1038.2 WESCOTT, SUSAN 82.17 37.78 44.39 11/17/2000 60.98 - 74.3122.1 WESTERBERG, STEVEN 86.81 40.25 46.56 10/19/2000 74.51 - none 43.0054.1 WESTROCK HOMES 44.18 44.18 12/14/2000 63.76 - 22.1216.1 WHElLER, ROBERT 100.80 54.4 7 46.33 11/27/2000 75.00 - none 4.1950.1 WHITE, EDWARD 171.71 77.48 94.23 11/24/2000 1 05.38 ~ none 4.0922.1 WHITING, BRENT & LYNETTE 134.56 86.79 47.77 11/27/2000 61.38 ~ none 5.0792.1 WICK, DON 220.44 122.63 97.81 11/22/2000 125.11 - none 52.0262.1 WILD SHAMROCK LLP 689.16 376.98 312.18 12/06/2000 259.07 - none 51.4230.1 WILLIAMS, ELIZABETH 110.82 67.90 42.92 11/16/2000 40.08 - none 1.3360.1 WILLIAMS, PAUL 195.11 6.48 59.08 77.69 51.86 09/20/2000 35.49 - none 22.1354.1 WILLIAMS, TERRI 227.31 122,35 104.96 12/13/2000 118.41 - none 74.0356.1 WILSON, DEANA 100.82 47.91 52.91 10/27/2000 59.51 - none 21.0988.1 WILSON, MARK 136.06 42.98 93.08 10/18/2000 127.68 - none 50.4490.3 WINTERS, BRIAN 65.67 36.69 28.98 1 0/12/2000 29.14 - 1.2010.1 WISDOM, RICK S 139.18 91.75 47.43 11/29/2000 58.66 - none 33.2358.2 WOLIN, DALE & LOIS 102.06 62.96 39.10 12/01/2000 40.49 - 74.3308.1 WOODLAND, WAIDE T 113.04 56.52 56.52 11/17/2000 55.37 - none 31.3344.1 WOODRUFF, NOEL R 131.82 72.92 58.90 11/29/2000 99.49 - none 22.1518.1 WOOSLEY, JAMES 135.55 60.40 75.15 11/29/2000 59.83 - none 22.1622.2 WRIGHT, DONALD 101.74 51.65 50.09 11/01/2000 74.77 - 21.1052.1 WRIGHT, TRAVIS 102.13 40.16 61.97 1 0/05/2000 92.41 - none 33.2382.5 YAMAMOTO, KRISTINE 74.84 40.66 34.18 74.3348.2 YEATTS, PAMELA 58.20 31.22 26.98 11/27/2000 30.00 - 74.0372.1 YEL TON, LAURA 80.00 37.87 42.13 11/27/2000 45.00 - none 22.0814.1 YELVERTON, MARC 131.90 83.21 48.69 11/28/2000 60.00 - none 2.0424.1 YOUNG, BRADLEY & SHERRY 106.80 61.51 44.83 .46 1 0/04/2000 89.00 - none 50.3740.1 YOUNG,DARON 62.93 34.09 28.84 11/14/2000 32.69 - none 74.0408.1 YOUNG, LARRY 66.85 31.58 35.27 12/01/2000 39.12 - none 50.4008.1 YOUNGBLOOD, JON 132.81 67.72 65.09 11/29/2000 32.32 - none 34.0758.1 YPON, GIN 100.95 55.56 45.39 10/16/2000 50.47 - none 20.1508.1 ZELLER, CORI 127.74 72.03 55.71 11/16/2000 54.56 - none 51.3320.1 ZIMMER, TIMOTHY P 685.31 641.71 43.60 11/24/2000 51.14 - none 4.0848.2 ZIMMERMAN, BRAD 99.38 67.94 31.44 09/14/2000 30.37 - Grand Totals: 113,960.77 53,837.23 47,934.90 6,053.58 6,135.06 Report Criteria: Terminated customers not included Customer. Cust No = {<} 9900000 *** in Msg column indicates no Notice is to be sent ( ( :}:r;;.:; ]~~;j~, .\,~z~ U. N ;i~SD~ ~JII LL. 9 .~t~JJ 0 T"" ;;:2'- ..... e ~~ ~ ec:: :c <( U) W _:.-_--~ - -f >- <( ~ ~ =1:t: ..... t) ~ U) u:: ~~" I"'';'~\ __-'" I~"~-i '':;<' 'i'.'-if; r~: -f N t~~~ ~;, (3 9 ';i~.€:l z T"" *~~ ~ e [~; 0 0:: t) <( ~j.f- ~;;_=r_c~ ~- ilt~ll c~ w _-:====-,;~- --- 0 >- ..... ~ ..... :;t: z t) w U) ~ u:: :ftt:!~ I ~tcx)- '" A{~l t~~; rf~~ Reo' T"" .yZ,; ~~'O; {'N: u. 0 I ~X~~ llit& u. 0 0 l- e ~;n~' ~ 0:: ~~ ~~f~g~3~ :I: <( ~t\::t:i U) W %S~_-t~; -f >- r:: Cl") <( -f <0 <( N N ~ t) =1:t: ... ..... t) en <( u:: ~=::(:~:-.:.;~.;. ~~~ ~-t"<<f ~~; ~~-{~}~ ~~~ ~~i ;.;';'.0: --:yr__-~-: ~~~<<>~ tjO.~ G:ro~ ",:'~: ...J T"" ?J~ ~'~.ro:; ~.~.~; l~ ~;cV.' u 0 ,tCost f;~ Y.<O.: 0 1~~~i ;::JO..: Z e ~~- -~~'l;g~ ~.~, ~ ~ X,. --:~~-.:;;'?:- 0 ~~ il; ".'-".'~K-' t) --:."=~~~- W :-0~:-~-.::':: ':'"_-v:~- _ ~-_:q:.(-::"~:"'.: ,.~ ;~-":.;-;;:_:- -- 0 >- ~ 0::> (j) ..... ~ ~ <0 <0 l- I"- 0::> <0 Z t) :;t: ... W U) s: u::: ~~~-~--i~: t~~ ;~~~~ ?ff.(i~ ~~~~ i~: "'--,,~- ~~'~i ~~ ~~ r30: ~~~; ,0~; 'i~-~'. :s- \-~~~~ '(LCC1: .~'i:C:;:~ ~;s(X), ~~"~ :~---").-==~_;IIIo: I :::~~-::-.- ~2~.~ LL e ~~~ ~i ~~~g~ ;if~i ;---,;~- ~t;~! ~~ ~~s m.~~ "t~ 0 :t:;); JA~ I~~ ;;f~ 1f;~ {{:sri' 5"~ .:: +If!; LL r{~~~ il::::;=-~ 0 en -<.CO', .-;~;di ;::\=- ',,,. if . 0) ~~':~-.::"::.-;---: -,.t.,(Y)- I- 0:: ,-}~; ~1iiJt: ~ <( ~JiJi -r:~~_-.:o.~ :J: U) W -_. -f >- Cl") I"- Cl") t: N Cl") I"- ~ f'-. C> Cl") c.o <( -f <0 <0 I"- <0 LO ex) CD C> LO N l{) <( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N ::J :J:t: oJ< ... l- t) ... t) U) <2: u:: I I zi~;. ;;*~i ~mJ ~~-i <fC'?;' J~$; -::-~~ ~P6~ rL~ 'j';6J; ~-ij~ ~! ;"-"., .; ~m~ {fro ~~: ;~1:::::-~ .; I l~ ~~}:~J:\ ~~~ ii ~~. :~())~ ...J 0 {{~ *;~ ~~ )1{<'t ~n~ U 0 ._-'"ro~ -.r:-.i!. ~,---,~~ ~!.O~ -;n:':7:=-~ ~~;?--~ f~=-~-----~ en j}r;.o; ~;~~~ ~.i-_(i')" ')':.O>l '. Z 0) .,~-~.' g:~; t~~j ~19~ il 1~~f ::) ;i:~~ ~1-:J(~- f0Yi~- 0 ~ @~tjI it::g :....::.._~_:::- _:~~ ~--~-&~~ , ;~~ ~:~~:;-~ :1~~~i:~ ~~~ ~~f) t) --::::{--;.0J; ~: W ~1J~~~~ ~f~{J:':; 'z-',,;:'l/;- ~ -_?~~-1._=-=':: 0 >- f'-. Cl") C> f'-. f'-. ..q 0::> f'-. C> co ~ t- -f '<:t l{) LO I"- Q') L() N ~ 0::> Q') C> ..... <2: ~~ C"")~ co I"- c.o c.o <0 N l{) LO <0 Z t) :;t: ~ ~ : w U) s: u:: ..c 0 :J: N ..c ~ I- 0:: 0:: (0 Z >- W 0 0:: W w ~ 0::: ..c 1;j ..c ~ CO :E w CO aJ <( ~ T"" a; I- :E CO :E :E ~ :I: T"" N T"" U) W -f 0 W W ~ ~ t) -f W W >- ~ I- ~ I- > t) Z CO c::: ~ ~ Z Z ...J C) a.. t ... t) 0 W <( W <( a.. ~ ~ ~ ~ W 0 ... 0 Z C ..., LL :E <( :E ..., ..., .., <( en l- i': r I I- Z o ~ ~ I I- 0::: o LL LL LL o Z 0::: => I- o Z U) W l- e::( I- (f) December 14,2000 MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING Department Report December 19, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith ITEM NO. 14 $-A-l REQUEST Meridian Transportation Task.Force Committee Report AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached r ~5J l-r7 II n jf}-J ..~ P tI 1 ' v Af}/ J~ pr CfJ 'I OU __ vrv' (1'D i (); ff . ~1Y lID 1 ~ If v- ~t r lA ^ I o OJl"O ~ Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at pubnc meetings shan become property of the City of Meridian. ,r--- - ( iRECEIV' ~D DEe 1 1 2000 CITY OF MERIDIANRECEll/' . CITY CLERK OFFICE .~'r;:r f , '- v f 1 20 (J (; ~lAYORS CITY OF ~FFI ( IT.L.eRID'' ~ 1....._ \ City of Meridian Public Works Dept. Memo To: Mayor Corrie From:Gary D. Smith, PE cc: file I City Clerk Date: 12/10/00 Re: Meridian Transportation Task Force Committee Report Mayor: Here is the annual report from the City of Meridian Transportation Task Force Committee outlining transportation n~s in the City of Meridian as recognized by this Committee. . I would appreciate it if you could authorize this item be placed on the December 19 City Council agenda for action by the Council. It is important that Council acts on these recommendations at this meeting so that City of Meridian needs can be sent to COMPASS and ACHD for inclusion in the Five-Year Work Program. questions please call. Gary o~ From the desk of. " . Gaty D. Smi~ FE Meridian City Engineer Meridian Public Works Departrn:m 2(X) E. Carlton Stl Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-260) . Page 1 (208) 887-2211 Fax: (208) 887-1297 ( ( last printed 12/05/00 4:16 PM MEMORANDUM November 17, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Gary Smith, PE I RE: Meridian Transportation Task Force Committee - Annual Meeting Dear Mayor & Council: This Committee met the evening of November 16, 2000 at your Public Works Department for about 3 hours to discuss transportation related projects in and around Meridian. The Committee reviewed our needs and the project priority list that was developed last year (1999) by this Committee. This Committee consists of people from a broad spectrum of occupations and agency representations and those attending are listed on the following page. The Committee had a very good discussion concerning our transportation needs with comments from all in attendance. The following pages generally represent the discussions of the committee members during this meeting. This information is being presented to you for your review and subsequent action. If you approve this Committee's recommendations, they should then be transmitted to COMPASS for their prioritization into the State of Idaho - Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Ali Bonakdar, at COMPASS, needs to receive our prioritization in early December so that he can compile the information he receives from all Ada County cities to present to ACHD for development of their 5-Year Work Program. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call on me. Sincerely, Gary 1 ( ( CITY OF MERIDIAN November 16, 2000 Rich Allison (Citizen) 916 E. 1st St.; Meridian 83642 888-3349 (W) 345-5274 (W) AIi Bonakdar (COMPASS) 413 W. Idaho, Ste. 100; Boise 83702 Keith Borup (P&Z) 2090 E. Freedom Lane; 83642 884-1 092 (W) Meridian Bill Gordon (Meridian Police Chief & Chairman of Traffic Safety Commission) Brad Hawkins-Clark (Meridian City Planning & Zoning Department) Jonathan Hennings (ITO) P.O. Box 8028; Boise 83707 334-8978 (W) Elmer Kassens (Citizen) 735 W. Carlton; Meridian 83642 888-9653 (H) Katey Levihn (ACHD) 318 E. 37th; Boise 83714 387-6109 (W) Pamela Lowe (ITO) P.O. Box 8028; Boise 83707 334-8303 (W) Cherie McCandless P.O. Box 1132; Meridian 83680 888-4753 (H) (City Council) Malcolm MacCoy (Citizen) 1024 E. Dominica Dr.; Meridian 83642 887-7611 (H) Gary Smith (City Pub.Wks.) 200 E.Carlton, Suite 100; Meridian 83642 887-2211 (W) Terry Smith (Citizen) 713 E. Kingsford; Meridian 83642 888-6801 (H) r~lr!lflJ;,fteiJQa;rCWiJi~9PPUElmlif1Ki$~~reiljjl~~QweJ 2 ( MERIDIAN TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION ITEMS DISCUSSED Nove"!"fiioirr11S~2'OO-O / ~, ., ..-, "_h..- f; ., - I Gary Smith called the meeting to order at 7:08 PM and thanked everyone for coming. Everyone in attendance introduced themselves and told who they were representing. The following projects, generally from past meeting(s), were reviewed with agency and individual comments: Waltman Lane I E.1st I Meridian Road I Central Drive Intersection. Construction is still scheduled for FY 2004 with design and right of way purchase scheduled for FY 2002 and 2003, respectively. Committee requests that ACHD perform a traffic count at this intersection, especially with the opening 'of WINCO. There was also discussion about signalizing of the Corporate Drive intersections and construction of Corporate Drive to the west to connect with W.Sth. This project is presently included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Committee feels this project needs to be re-set to where it was. Park and Ride Lots. The Overland/Eagle Road lot is constructed. The Overland/Hwy 69 lot is held up because of some right of way negotiations with the property owner. This lot is scheduled to be built in FY 2001 because of the right of way problems. Storm Water Drainaae Control. ACHD has retained Civil Survey Consultants to complete a drainage study for the North Meridian area as well as other areas in Meridiana ACHD says they have received a 2nd Draft of this study and will look into forwarding a copy to us. With the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process taking effect for storm water discharge, alternative methods of storm water disposal with grassy swale treatment will probably be applicable. Perhaps we need to look at non-curb/gutter street sections to reduce point discharges of run-off. Five Mile Creek Pathway. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) has reached agreement with City of Meridian on the Pathway Use License Agreement. The pathway plans are at lTD. PS&E is getting them ready for release to bid for construction. 3 ( Interchange Beautification. Discussion took place on filing an application for federal "STP-Enhancement" funds to beautify the Meridian and Eagle Road Interchanges, with emphasis on Meridian Road. As discussed at our last meeting, if we file an application we need to have a plan prepared and be prepared to enter into a maintenance agreement with lTD. Aoolications are due Februarv 16. The application takes a lot of work. This application submittal would be for a project for FY 2004. Committee wants to move forward with an application to see what happens. In that regard AIi will send a copy of City of Caldwell's application, that was approved for funding, to give us an idea of what our application needs to look like. This application will need the approval of our City Parks Deparbnent along with City Council. Lo~1 participation is required. The amount of participation depends on the amount of the grant. Maxiinum amount of grant is $500,000 with a 10% local match. The local match can be cash or in-lieu of cash. Functional Classification Map. COMPASS states this map has been updated. AIi handed out a few copies~ A note was made of the urban interchanges on Eagle Road. Fairview/Eagle is priority one followed by FranklinlEagle. Overlav Proiects. Katey Levihn (ACHD) will provide a current listing of overlay projects to City Engineer after ACHD has completed the project selection process that is currently underway. Pine Avenue. This improvement, from Eagle Road east and west, will be developer driven because of the present development activity. ACHD has purchased some right of way and the property owner south of Blue Cross (Elixir) is interested in the process to sell right of way for their half of the roadway. ACHD lists Preliminary Engineering (PE) for FY2000 for the section from Eagle to Locust Grove, securing right of way (RNV) in FY2002 and construction in FY2003. The section from Eagle to Cloverdale secures Rm in FY 2002 with construction in FY 2003. ACHD needs to work with the development community to get this length of roadway built from Nola to Cloverdale. This is a good example of a public/private partnership project. The Pine I Eagle Road intersection signalization plans are 2/3 complete and the signal parts have been purchased by the Crossroads Center developer and are being stored by ACHD. To further facilitate traffic movement east-west, we also need to emphasize the Pine Street improvement from E.1 st to Nola. Speed Limits. The City Traffic Safety Commission will continue to monitor comments about city speed limits. Police Chief, City Engineer and ACHD Traffic Engineer are on this committee. Police Chief Gordon discussed a concern about the speed limit on Kuna-Meridian Road, south of Overland and on Eagle Road. He has talked to ITO and they refuse to lower the speed limits on these two roads. Jonathan will find out who Chief talked to and get more information for us. To help with speed control on Eagle we need to have the signal light installed at PinelEagle. The 4 ( developer of Crossroads says he has purchased the equipment and the plans are 75 ok complete. Katey will find out what the schedule is for this installation. The speed on Eagle is seriously high and Chief says more and more injury accidents are occurring. Photo enforcement of speed is a proposed law being sent to the legislature this year with support from ACHD and the Police Chiefs Association. Traffic Calming Devices. ACHD has a procedure set up to handle requests for traffic calming devices. Darren Carroll was referenced as a contact person at ACHD for information and application under the Neighborhood Enhancement program. No requests have been made to our Traffic Safety Commission for these devices. 1-84 Interchange at Ten Mile Road. This improvement still ranks high in priority to provide Interstate access for North Meridian residents. Overpasses at Linder and Locust Grove Roads are also of major interest to connect the southerly areas of growth with Meridian's core area. Preliminary results of the ITO sponsored Interstate Corridor Study have been distributed to Meridian Mayor and Council for review. It has caused some controversy. The 1-84 Corridor Study is starting up again and will be completed by August 2001. In February 2001, prioritization of interchange locations will begin. Cost of an interchange was discussed at somewhere between $20 and $30 Million (similar to Isaac Canyon). How can financing be obtained? There are some rumors that a large developer is forming some plans for development in the Ten Mile Road area between 1-84 and Franklin Road. Apparently this developer has funds available to contribute to the cost of constructing the interchange. ACHD is aware of this. ITD representative is not. We have been told in the past that ITO looks more favorably to projects that have some local funding of some type involved. Locust Grove Road Overpass. ACHD is selecting a consulting engineer (November 17,2000) to design this overpass and the length of Locust Grove Road from Overland to Franklin Road. ACHD has committed $750,000 for the design, which would be complete by the end of 2001. Right of way to be purchased FY 2002 with pOSSible construction in FY 2003 or 2004. City of Meridian has committed $1.8 Million for purchase of right of way. ITD has committed $2.7 Million of Interstate Maintenance Funds with an additional $2 Million from STP-U funding. This project will include improvement of Locust Grove Road and probable signalization of Locust Grove intersections with Franklin and Overland Roads. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) needs to be completed between ITO, ACHD and City of Meridian outlining who is responsible for what. We are told that ITO is drafting this MOU for approval and signature by all involved parties. Katey will check to see where it is in the process. Overland Road. Presently this project, from Meridian Road to Eagle Road, is programmed for FY 2005. This must be moved up in priority. This project has been designed for 6 or 7 years but will need tog 5 ( ( be updated. Meridian School District is underway with plans to construct the new high school, east of Locust GrQve Road and south of Overland Road~ The primary access to this high school will be Overland ~oad~ It is scheduled for opening in the fall of 2002~ It is estimated the school will have an initial enrollment of 1600 students, half of which will drive, plus a staff of 120. A considerable amount of medium-high density housing and commercial development is scheduled between Overland Road and the high school site. Additionally, other development is being discussed along Overland Road, on both sides, from Locust Grove to Eagle Road and at the intersection of Eagle Road. The approved Fiscal Year Work Program (FYWP) 2001-2005 shows Overland Road being constructed from Meridian Road to Locust Grove in 2004 and from Locust Grove to Eagle Road in 2005~ These two projects need to be combined to one year and moved up in the schedule. The committee strongly recommended that Overland Road be placed ahead of Franklin in priority. . - Franklin Road. Committee realizes that Franklin and Overland cannot be btlilt at the same time because of detouring traffic. However, the Committee feels that the need to rebuild Franklin Road will dramatically increase after the construction of the Locust Grove Road/Overpass project. Committee recommends that at a minimum, if the length of Franklin Road from E.1st to Eagle cannot be constructed at one time, the priority of constructing Franklin Road segments be changed such that the section from Locust Grove to Eagle is constructed first followed by the section from Locust Grove to E.1 st. Committee still feels that inconvenience to travelling public will be no greater to construct the entire 2-mile length than to construct i-mile at a time. Therefore, Committee desire is to have the two-mile length constructed as a proiect Signalization. . 1-84 East-Bound Off Ramo at Meridian Road: Committee had been previously told that ACHD will get a signal installed at this location this year (2000) or next (2001). However, this is an ITD project that has been identified for installation in FY 2004. -This intersection is a night-mare for traffic turning movements at most times of the day. Committee desires this installation to be done as soon as possible and requests such action from lTD. . Fire Station at Franklin Road & Future Fire Station at Ten Mile Road: Signalization needs to be provided to provide safe exit of emergency vehicles from the fire stations. ACHD has evaluated the Franklin Road site and has responded with a letter to Mayor Corrie as to what they can do with associated costs. Because design needs to be completed for Franklin Road, ACHD is proposing to locate a temporary (typical) fire station signal at the fire station driveway using salvaged signal materials at a cost of $35,000. A permanent installation will be made at the intersection of Stratford and Franklin with the Franklin Road improvement project. ACHD will allow use of salvaged material at Ten Mile Road station. They will not be able to install. Estimated cost for design, materials and installation is $55,000-$70,000. ACHD is requesting response from City of Meridian as to how to proceed. Audit of Impact Fees I Project Considerable discussion took place concerning the audit showing a comparison of Impact Fees collected and money spent on roadway improvement projects in our zone for the past 5-years. Cherie commented that ACHD has provided some information however, it wasn't what the City 6 ( Council President had requested. Committee requests, again, that this audit information be presented to the City and this Committeew Collected impact fees, by law, are to be spent within the zone they were collected. Miscellaneous Comments. . Committee still feels we need to have a mile of arterial road built each year to facilitate traffic movements from the rapid growth in our areaw We are still behind. . Alternative methods of storm water treatment/disposal, utilizing side street grassy swales in lieu of curb and gutter to control street drainage discharge that will be subject to conditions of an NPDES permit, need to be consideredw Committee asks that ACHD look at this alternative and either advance the proposal or toss it out. . Installation of street lights at county section line road intersections, especially where the north-south through roads intersect the east-west ros'ds, needs to be considered. How can these be funded? Katey (ACHO) will see if this conCept can be funded through a school bus lighting program, upon receipt of a list of desired luminaire installations from Meridian. There are several hazardous intersections in the county that are claiming lives each year, where lighting will help. . Truck traffic through downtown Meridian and its impact on our infrastructure and traffic is still a matter that needs to be discussed. At last year's meeting Katey said that Mark Clough (ACHD) has put a truck traffic movement study ,together and she will send a copy of it to us. ACHD would also send a representative to City.Council to make a presentation to them. This would probably be of benefit . ITO: .:. Status of replacing the Meridian Road Interchangew It doesn't look good because the Sufficiency Rating is a little over 70, even though it can be classified as functionally obsolete because of a lateral clearance restriction with an interstate travel lane. If additonallanes are added to 1-84 to the west, this structure will need to be replaced. .:. We discussed pedestrian traffic across the Meridian Road 11-84 overpassw Chief Gordon said the pedestrian traffic continues and that so far there have not been any serious problemsw A free standing pedestrian bridge could be constructed, however, attaching a pedestrian walkway to the existing structure is not an option. . Committee is appreciative to ACHD and ITD (or their construction of right turn lanes for east and west bound traffic at the intersection of Franklin Road and Eagle Road. This intersection is severely congested and these free right turn movements are a tremendous help. . Committee is also appreciative to ACHD for their construction of an additional east and west bound right turn lane from Overland Road onto Eagle Road. . Committee requests that ACHD submit a roadway maintenance plan for Meridian for the next 5 years. 7 ( . Committee discussed the need for a right turn lane of north-bound traffic on E. 1st at Franklin Road. This would also need to facilitate right turn truck traffic, which presently turns into opposing lanes on Franklin to complete their turning movement Storey Park land would need to be dedicated to ACHD for the lane and relocation of the signal polea 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN 2000 TRANSPORTATION RELATED PROJECTS (Priority Based Listina) 1. Locust Grove Road Overpass. A Consulting Engineer is being selected by ACHD (December 1 , 2000) for design of this project. ACHD is funding the design $750,000 and a significant portion of the construction costs. Meridian is funding $1.8 Million for purchase of right of way. ITO funds $2.7 Million, and $2 Million frorn STP-U. Design may be complete by end of 2001. Right of way purchase 2002. Construct 2003 or 2004. 2~ Rebuild Overland Road from Meridian to Eagle Road/ The plans for this project have been done for quite some time. The sewer and water line extension project under 1-84 is complete. We will now see building pressures along Overland Road from Lo~st Grove to Eagle Road. The capacity of this length of roadway must be increased. 3. Rebuild Franklin Road from E.1st to Eagle Road; concurrently rebuild Locust Grove from Pine to Franklin Road. ACHD has $2.3 Million for purchase of right of way for this rebuild. ACHD needs to start railroad approval for a new crossing of Locust Grove Road. The existing railroad crossing of Nola Road will probably need to be closed. Pressure for improvement of Franklin will increase with constru-ction of Locust Grove Road and Overpass. 4. Rebuild Meridian Road from Cherry Lane to Franklin Road to 3-lanes and preserve and support the 80-foot wide right of way. 5. Rebuild Linder Road from Franklin north to Cherry Lane. Design scheduled in FY 2001 ; RNV in FY 2002 and construction in FY 2003. 6~ Rebuild Ten Mile Road from Franklin to Ustick. 7 ~ Signalization. 1-84 East-Bound Off RamD at Meridian Road is presently scheduled for construction in FY 2004. This project must be moved up. The lack of signal here is causing severe congestion which must be mitigated. Franklin Road Fire Station Emergency Exit Siana/: This signal needs to be installed as soon as possible to allow safe movement of emergency vehicles from the station. Ten Mile Road Fire Station Emeraencv Exit Signal: This station is under construction and this signal needs to be designed and built to.be functional at the time the station is complete. Again, safety of exiting emergency vehicles is at issue. Synchronization of Traffic Signals: ACHD has cabling complete however, an extension is needed to their radio wave receivingltransmitting tower at their headquarters. This sync project has been going on for a number of years. It has become a mandatory item to provide control of signals at peak traffic movement times. 8. Construct Intersection Improvements at Waltman Lane, Meridian Road, E.1 at Sl, Central Drive. Continued commercial development in Central Valley Corporate Park and west of Meridian Road. 9 ( (" 9. Rebuild Pine Avenue from Nola to E.1st Street. 10. Rebuild Locust Grove Road from Ustick to Chinden. 11. Construct Right Turn Lane at E.1st for north-bound traffic turning at Franklin Road. 12. Overlay E.3"' Street from Franklin Road to Pine, including railroad crossing improvement, to relieve truck traffic through Meridian on E.1st Street 13. Interchange Beautification. Ask ITD to be a sponsor of this project to facilitate its funding. Requirements for this project are previously outlined in this report. The following are footnotes to the above listed prioritization. 8. Committee understands and supports that the Rebuild ~f Locust Grove Road from Fairview to Ustick will remain as previously scheduled/to be constructed in FY 2001. For this reason, this project is not currently shown on the prioritization list. b. Committee understands and supports that the Ten Mile Road Interchange is a part of the ITD Corridor Study which is underway again. We understand that prioritization of interchanges will be addressed by this study some time after February 2001 and that this location has a good priority basis. For this reason this project is not currently shown on our prioritiy list. I ' c. Committee understands and supports that in addition to the Locust Grove Road Overpass, the Linder Road Overpass is necessary to provide adequate passage of vehicles from North Meridian to South Meridian. d. Committee understands and supports that the existing Meridian Road Interchange structure needs to be replaced with a wider structure providing added traffic lanes and pedestrian crossing. That this structure has a relatively high Sufficiency Rating putting it low on the list of critical bridges for replacement. We also understand that this structure will need to be replaced if additional Interstate lane(s) is added from this point west. 10 City of Meridian Public Works Dept. RECEIVED DEe 1 0 2000 CITY OF NillRIDIAN Memo To: Mayor Corrie From:Gary D. Smith, PE cc: file I City Clerk Date: 12/10/00 Re: Meridian Transportation Task Force Committee Report jf# Mayor: Here is the annual report from the City of Meridian Transportation Task Force Committee outlining transportation needs in the City of Meridian as recognized by this Committee. I would appreciate it if you could authorize this item be placed on the December 19 City Council agenda for action by the Council. It is important that Council acts on these recommendations at this meeting so that City of Meridian needs can be sent to COMPASS and ACHD for indusion in the Five-Year Work Program. questions please ca". Gary From the desk of. . . Gaty D. Smi~ PE Meridian City Engineer l\.1eridian Public Works Department 2(X) E. Carlton St., Suite 100 l\.1eridian, IdaOO 83642-2600 . Page 1 (208) 887-2211 Fax: (208) 887-1297 (- Last printed 12/05/00 4:16 PM MEMORANDUM November 17, 2000 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Gary Smith, PE RE: Meridian Transportation Task Force Committee - Annual Meeting Dear Mayor & Council: This Committee met the evening of November 16, 2000 at your Public Works Department for about 3 hours to discuss transportation related projects in and around Meridian. The Committee reviewed our needs and the project priority list that was developed last year (1999) by this Committee. This Committee consists of people from a broad spectrum of occupations and agency representations and those attending are listed on the following page. The Committee had a very good discussion concerning our transportation needs with comments from all in attendance. The following pages generally represent the discussions of the committee members during this meeting. This information is being presented to you for your review and subsequent action. If you approve this Committee's recommendations, they should then be transmitted to COMPASS for their prioritization into the State of Idaho - Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). AIi Bonakdar, at COMPASS, needs to receive our prioritization in early December so that he can compile the information he receives from all Ada County cities to present to ACHD for development of their 5-Year Work Program. If you have any questions please donJt hesitate to call on me. Sincerely, Gary 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN November 16, 2000 Rich Allison (Citizen) 916 E. 1st St.; Meridian 83642 888-3349 (W) 345-5274 (W) AIi Bonakdar (COMPASS) 413 W. Idaho, Ste. 100; Boise 83702 Keith Borup (P&Z) 2090 E. Freedom Lane; 83642 884-1 092 (W) Meridian Bill Gordon (Meridian Police Chief & Chairman of Traffic Safety Commission) Brad Hawkins-Clark (Meridian City Planning & Zoning Department) Jonathan Hennings (ITD) P.O. Box 8028; Boise 83707 334-8978 (W) Elmer Kassens (Citizen) 735 W. Carlton; Meridian 83642 888-9653 (H) Katey Levihn (ACHO) 318 E. 37th; Boise 83714 387 -6109 (W) Pamela Lowe (ITO) P.O. Box 8028; Boise 83707 334-8303 (W) Cherie McCandless P.O. Box 1132; Meridian 83680 ~ 888-4753 (H) (City Council) Malcolm MacCoy (Citizen) 1024 E. Dominica Dr.; Meridian 83642 887-7611 (H) Gary Smith (City Pub.Wks.) 200 E.Carlton, Suite 100; Meridian 83642 887 -2211 (W) Terry Smith (Citizen) 713 E. Kingsford; Meridian 83642 888-6801 (H) I Al1rih:fillenfJan~~YJxootlEliflfiFlKasSl11fSf8naTRa7ff!l1owe .. l~ .' --,- ,. .". .. .,.-... - - >, -'__'~'_'"t::;f!!:.,...-_..- -~" 'R., ~_~~ ".___~-,......a._-<..__....a......~, -,_ ,. .,. N ','.',- r". ,. _. ~ 2 ( MERIDIAN TRANSPORTATION TASK FORCE COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION ITEMS DISCUSSED t;t'~VE(mJmlmlr~o~a .....~q'l4mU.~~.~_;~-',.,t~g_~~ Gary Smith called the meeting to order at 7:08 PM and thanked everyone for coming. Everyone in attendance introduced themselves and told who they were representing. The following projects, generally from past meeting(s), were reviewed with agency and individual comments: Waltman Lane I E.1st I Meridian Road I Central Drive Intersection. Construction is still scheduled for FY 2004 with design and right of way purchase scheduled for FY 2002 and 2003, respectively. Committee requests that ACHD perform a traffic count at this intersection, especially with the opening of WINCO. There was also discussion about signalizing of the Corporate Drive intersections and construction of Corporate Drive to the west to connect with W.Sth. This project is presently included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Committee feels this project needs to be re-set to where it was. Park and Ride Lots. The Overland/Eagle Road lot is constructed. The Overland/Hwy 69 lot is held up because of some right of way negotiations with the property owner. This lot is scheduled to be built in FY 2001 because of the right of way problems. Storm Water Drainage Control. ACHD has retained Civil Survey Consultants to complete a drainage study for the North Meridian area as well as other areas in Meridian. ACHD says they have received a 2nd Draft of this study and will look into forwarding a copy to us. With the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting process taking effect for storm water discharge, alternative methods of storm water disposal with grassy swate treatment will probably be applicable. Perhaps we need to look at rion-curb/gutter street sections to reduce point discharges of run-off. Five Mile Creek Pathway. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District (NMID) has reached agreement with City of Meridian on the Pathway Use License Agreement. The pathway plans are at lTD. ~PS&E is getting them ready for release to bid for construction. 3 ( Interchange Beautification. Discussion took place on filing an application for federal "STP-Enhancernent" funds to beautify the Meridian and Eagle Road Interchanges, with emphasis on Meridian Road. As discussed at our last meeting, if we file an application we need to have a plan prepared and be prepared to enter into a maintenance agreement with lTD. Aoolications are due February 16. The application takes a lot of work. This application submittal would be for a project for FY 2004. Committee wants to move forward with an application to see what happens. In that regard AU will send a copy of City of Caldwell's application, that was approved for funding, to give us an idea of what our application needs to look like. This application will need the approval of our City Parks Deparbnent along with City Council. Local participation is required. The amount of participation depends on the amount of the grant. Maximum amount of grant is $500,000 with a 10% local match. The local match can be cash or in-lieu of cash. Functional Classification Map. COMPASS states this map has been updated. AIi handed out a few copies. A note was made of the urban interchanges on Eagle Road. Fairview/Eagle is priority one followed by FranklinlEagle. Overlay Projects. Katey levihn (ACHO) will provide a current listing of overlay projects to City Engineer after ACHD has completed the project selection process that is currently underway. Pine Avenue. This improvement, from Eagle Road east and west, will be developer driven because of the present development activity. ACHD has purchased some right of way and the property owner south of Blue Cross (Elixir) is interested in the process to sell right of way for their hatf of the roadway ~ ACHD lists Preliminary Engineering (PE) for FY2000 for the section from Eagle to Locust Grove, securing right of way (RNV) in FY2002 and construction in FY2003. The section from Eagle to Cloverdale secures RfN in FY 2002 with construction in FY 2003. ACHD-needs to work with the development community to get this length of roadway built from Nola to Cloverdale. This is a good example of a public/private partnership project: The Pine / Eagle Road intersection signalization plans are 2/3 complete and the signal parts have been purchased by the Crossroads Center developer and are being stored by ACHD. To further facilitate traffic movement east-west, we also need to emphasize the Pine Street improvement from E~ 1 st to Nola. Speed Limits. The City Traffic Safety Commission will continue to monitor comments about city speed limits. Police Chief, City Engineer and ACHD Traffic Engineer are on this committee~ Police Chief Gordon discussed a concern about the speed limit on Kuna-Meridian Road, south of Overland and on Eagle Road. He has talked to ITO and they refuse to lower the speed limits on these two roads. Jonathan will find out who Chief talked to and get more -information for us. To help with speed control on Eagle we need to have the signal light installed at Pine/Eagle. The 4 developer of Crossroads says he has purchased the equipment and the plaITs are 75 % complete. Katey will find out what the schedule is for this installation. The speed on Eagle is seriously high and Chief says more and more injury accidents are occurring. Photo enforcement of speed is a proposed law being sent to the legislature this year with support from ACHD and the Police Chiefs Association. Traffic Calmina Devices. ACHD has a procedure set up to handle requests for traffic calming devices. Darren Carroll was referenced as a contact person at ACHD for information and application under the Neighborhood Enhancement program. No requests have been made to our Traffic Safety Commission for these devices. 1-84 Interchange at Ten Mile Road. This improvement still ranks high in priority to provide Interstate access for North Meridian residents. Overpasses at Linder and Locust Grove Roads are also of major interest to connect the southerly areas of growth with Meridian's core area. Preliminary results of the ITD sponsored Interstate Corridor Study have been distributed to Meridian Mayor and Council for review. It has caused some controversy. The 1-84 Corridor Study is starting up again and will be completed by August 2001. In February 2001, prioritization of interchange locations will begin. Cost of an interchange was discussed at somewhere between $20 and $30 Million (similar to Isaac Canyon). How can financing be obtained? There are some rumors that a large developer is forming some plans for development in the Ten Mile Road area between 1-84 and Franklin Road. Apparently this developer has funds available to contribute to the cost of constructing the interchange. ACHD is aware of this. ITO representative is not. We have been told in the past that ITO looks more favorably to projects that have some local funding of some type involved. Locust Grove Road Overpass. ACHD is selecting a consulting engineer (November 17, 2000) to design this overpass and the length of Locust Grove Road from Overland to Franklin Road. ACHD has ~committed $750,000 for the design, which would be complete by the end of 2001. Right of way to be purchased FY 2002 with possible construction in FY 2003 or 2004. City of Meridian has committed $1.8 Million for purchase of right of way. ITO has committed $2.7 Million of Interstate Maintenance Funds with an additional $2 Million from STP-U funding. This project will include improvement of Locust Grove Road and probable signalization of Locust Grove intersections with Franklin and Overland Roads. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) needs to be completed between ITO, ACHD and City of Meridian outlining who is responsible for what We are told that ITO is drafting this MOU for approval and signature by all involved parties. Katey will check to see where it is in the process. Overland Road. Presently this project, from Meridian Road to Eagle Road, is progra'mmed for FY 2005. This must be moved up in priority. This project has been designed for 6 or 7 years but will need to 5 ( be updated. Meridian School District is underway with plans to construct the'new high school, east of Locust Grove Road and south of Overland Road. The primary access to this high school will be Overland Road. It is scheduled for opening in the fall of 2002. It is estimated the school will have an initial enrollment of 1600 students, half of which will drive, plus a staff of 120. A considerable amount of medium-high density housing and commercial development is scheduled between Overland Road and the high school site. Additionally, other development is being discussed along Overland Road, on both sides, from Locust Grove to Eagle Road and at the intersection of Eagle Road. The approved Fiscal Year Work Program (FYWP) 2001-2005 shows Overland Road being constructed from Meridian Road to Locust Grove in 2004 and from Locust Grove to Eagle Road in 2005. These two projects need to be combined to one year and moved up in the schedule. The committee strongly recommended that Overland Road be placed ahead of Franklin in priority. Franklin Road. Committee realizes that Franklin and Overland cannot be built at the same time because of detouring traffic. However, the Committee feels that the need to rebuild Franklin Road will dramatically increase after the construction of the Locust Grove Road/Overpass project. Committee recommends that at a minimum, if the length of Franklin Road from E.1 st to Eagle cannot be constructed at one time, the priority of constructing Franklin Road segments be changed such that the section from Locust Grove to Eagle is constructed first followed by the section from Locust Grove to E.1 st~ Committee still feels that inconvenience to travelling public will be no greater to construct the entire 2-mile length than to construct 1-mile at a time. Therefore, Committee desire is to have the two-mile length constructed as a project Sianalization. · 1-84 East-Bound Off Ramo at Meridian Road: Committee had been previously told that ACHD will get a signal installed at this location this year (2000) or next (2001). However, this is an ITD project that has been identified for installation in FY 2004. ,This intersection is a night-mare for traffic turning movements at most times of the day. Committee desires this installation to be done as soon as possible and requests such action from lTD. · Fire Station at Franklin Road & Future Fire Station at Ten Mile Road: Signalization needs to be provided to provide safe exit of emergency vehicles from the fire stations. ACHD has evaluated the Franklin Road site and has responded with a~letter to Mayor Corrie as to what they can do with associated costs. Because design needs to be completed for Franklin Road, ACHD is proposing to locate a temporary (typical) fire station signal at the fire station driveway using salvaged signal materials at a cost of $35,000. A permanent installation will be made at the intersection of Stratford and Franklin with the Franklin Road improvement project. ACHD will allow use of salvaged material at Ten Mile Road station. They will not be able to install. Estimated cost for design, materials and installation is $55,OOO-$70,OOO~ ACHD is requesting response from City of Meridian as to how to proceed. Audit of Impact Fees I Project Considerable discussion took place concerning the audit showing a comparison of Impact Fees collected and money spent on roadway improvement projects in our' zone for the past 5-years. Cherie commented that ACHD has provided some information however, it wasn't what the City 6 ( ( Council President had requested. Committee requests, again, that this audit" information be presented to the City and this Committee. Collected impact fees, by law, are to be spent within the zone they were collected. Miscellaneous Comments. · Committee still feels we need to have a mile of arterial road built each year to facilitate traffic movements from the rapid growth in our area. We are still behind. · Alternative methods of storm water treatment/disposal, utilizing side street grassy swales in lieu of curb and gutter to control street drainage discharge that will be subject to conditions of an NPDES permit, need to be considered. Committee asks that ACHD look at this alternative and either advance the proposal or toss it out. · Installation of street lights at county section line road intersections, especially where the north-south through roads intersect the east-west roads, needs to be considered. How can these be funded? Katey (ACHO) will see if this concept can be funded through a school bus lighting program, upon receipt of a list of desired luminaire installations from Meridian. There are several hazardous intersections in the county that are claiming lives each year, where lighting will help. · Truck traffic through downtown Meridian and its impact on our infrastructure and traffic is still a matter that needs to be discussed. At last year's meeting Katey said that Mark Clough (ACHO) has put a truck traffic movement study together and she will send a copy of it to us. ACHD would also send a representative to City Council to make a presentation to them. This would probably be of benefit. . ITO: .:. Status of replacing the Meridian Road Interchange. It doesn't look good because the Sufficiency Rating is a little over 70, even though it can be classified as functionally obsolete because of a lateral clearance restriction with an interstate travel lane. If additonallanes are added to 1-84 to the west, this structure will need to be replaced. .:. We discussed pedestrian traffic across the Meridian Road 11-84 overpass. Chief Gordon said the pedestrian traffic continues and that so far there have not been any serious problems. A free standing pedestrian bridge could be constructed, however, attaching a pedestrian walkway to the existing structure is not an option. · Committee is appreciative to ACHD and ITD for their construction of right turn lanes for east and west bound traffic at the intersection of Franklin Road and Eagle Road. This intersection is severely congested and these free right turn movements are a tremendous help. · Committee is also appreciative to ACHD for their construction of an additional east and west bound right turn lane from Overland Road onto Eagle Road. · Committee requests that ACHD submit a roadway maintenance plan for Meridian for the next 5 years. 7 ( · Committee discussed the need for a right turn lane of north-bound traffic on E. 1st at Franklin Road. This would also need to facilitate right turn truck traffic, which presently turns into opposing lanes on Franklin to complete their turning movement. Storey Park land would need to be dedicated to ACHD for the lane and relocation of the signal pole. 8 I' { ( CITY OF MERIDIAN 2000 TRANSPORTATION RELATED PROJECTS (Priority Based Listina) 1. Locust Grove Road Overpass. A Consulting Engineer is being selected by ACHD (December 1 , 2000) for design of this project. ACHD is funding the design $750,000 and a significant portion of the construction costs. Meridian is funding $1.8 Million for purchase of right of way. ITD funds $2.7 Million, and $2 Million from STP-U. Design may be complete by end of 2001. Right of way purchase 2002. Construct 2003 or 2004. 2. Rebuild Overland Road from Meridian to Eagle Road. The plans for this project have been done for quite some time. The sewer and water line extension project under 1-84 is complete. We will now see building pressures along Overland Road from Locust Grove to Eagle Road. The capacity of this length of roadway must be increased. 3. Rebuild Franklin Road from E.1st to Eagle Road; concurrently rebuild Locust Grove from Pine to Franklin Road. ACHD has $2.3 Million for purchase of right of way for this rebuild. ACHD needs to start railroad approval for a new crossing of Locust Grove Road. The existing railroad crossing of Nola Road will probably need to be closed. Pressure for improvement of Franklin will increase with construction of Locust Grove Road and Overpass. 4. Rebuild Meridian Road from Cherry Lane to Franklin Road to 3-lanes and preserve and support the aD-foot wide right of way. 5. Rebuild Linder Road from Franklin north to Cherry Lane. Design scheduled in FY 2001 ; RNV in FY 2002 and construction in FY 2003. 6. Rebuild Ten Mile Road from Franklin to Ustick. 7. Signalization. 1-84 East-Bound Off RamD at Meridian Road is presently scheduled for construction in FY 2004. This project must be moved up. The lack of signal here is causing severe congestion which must be mitigated. - Franklin Road Fire Station Emergencv Exit Signal: This signal needs to be installed as soon as possible to allow safe movement of emergency vehicles from the station. Ten Mile Road Fire Station Emeraencv Exit Signal.- This station is under construction and this signal needs to be designed and built to be functional at the time the station is complete. Again, safety of exiting emergency vehicles is at issue. Synchronization of Traffic Sianals: ACHD has cabling complete however, an extension is needed to their radio wave receiving/transmitting tower at their headquarters. This sync project has been going on for a number of years. It has become a mandatory item to provide control of signals at peak traffic movement times. 8. Construct Intersection Improvements at Waltman Lane, Meridian Road, E.1st Sl, Central Drive. Continued commercial development in Central Valley Corporate Park and west of Meridian Road. 9 r ( 9. Rebuild Pine Avenue from Nola to E.1st Street. 10. Rebuild Locust Grove Road from Ustick to Chinden. 11. Construct Right Turn Lane at E.1st for north-bound traffic turning at Franklin Road. 12. Overlay E.3rd Street from Franklin Road to Pine, including railroad crossing improvement, to relieve truck traffic through Meridian on E.1st Street 13. Interchange Beautification. Ask ITO to be a sponsor of this project to facilitate its funding. Requirements for this project are previously outlined in this report. The following are footnotes to the above listed prioritization. a. Committee understands and supports that the Rebuild of Locust Grove Road from Fairview to Ustick will remain as previously scheduled, to be constructed in FY 2001. For this reason, this project is not currently shown on the prioritization list. b. Committee understands and supports that the Ten Mile Road Interchange is a part of the ITD Corridor Study which is underway again. We understand that prioritization of interchanges will be addressed by this study some time after February 2001 and that this location has a good priority basis. For this reason this project is not currently shown on our prioritiy list. c. Committee understands and supports that in addition to the Locust Grove Road Overpass, the Linder Road Overpass is necessary to provide adequate passage of vehicles from North Meridian to South Meridian. d. Committee understands and supports that the existing Meridian Road Interchange structure needs to be replaced with a wider structure providing added traffic lanes and pedestrian crossing. That this structure has a relatively high SuffICiency Rating putting it low on the list of critical bridges for replacement. We also understand that this structure will need to be replaced if additional Interstate lane(s) is added from this point west. 10 ( ( Proposal for Funding Service Commuter Shuttle Service 1) Shuttle service for commuters would be provided with a short term contract for service and start 3/27/00. A full bid process will be undertaken with the hope that a permanent contractor can be on board by 8/1. Funding for the service for the first year would be as follows: City of Meridian WYE Funding CCDe (pending) 8t Lukes (pending) $17,500 80,000 10,000 3~OOO $110,500 30~000 $140.500 Fare Revenue Total Revenue Mid-Day Shuttle Service 2) Mid day trips will be provided by Treasure Valley Transit (who operates Nampa/Caldwell bus system) as an extension of their Nampa/Caldwell service. TVT is the public rural transportation provider and are interested in providing that service from lOam to 2 pm. Their service will include stops at St AI's and Boise Towne Square Mall in addition to regular shuttle stops in downtown Boise. The $40,000 estimated cost would be covered as follows: City of Meridian Contribution $ 1 2,500 WYE funding 7,500 TVT Rural Transit funds 10,000 Fares 10.000 Total Revenue $ 40,000 *City ofNampa has contributed $10,000 for expanded mid-day service into Meridian from Nampa Total Funding Requested from Meridian Shuttle Service Commuter Shuttle Mid Da Shuttle Total Contribution tember 2000 October 2000-Se t 2001 $17,500 $12,500 $30,000 ( ( Treasure Valley Metro Rider Questionnaire The Ada County Highway District Highway Commuteride Office as part of the WYE Re-Construction Mitigation Project contracts for the new Treasure Valley Metro. Treasure Valley Transit operates the bus service through this contract. Management officials of the Commuter Express are interested in your comments concerning the overall level of service, routes, schedules and the proposed changes. The goal will be to provide a commuter service that will better accommodate commuter work hours and to better align the arrival times with the Boise Urban Stages downtown transfer times. Please complete the following survey and mail it to ACHD Commuteride in the pre-addresed, postage paid envelope attached to this survey. 1) On the table below, please circle all locations and times you board the TV Metro in the morning: Karcher Mall Nampa Park & Ride Lot Gem Street 8t Lukes- Meridian -- 6:05 6:15 6:25 6:20 6:30 6:45 6:55 6:50 7:00 7:15 7:25 -- -- 7:45 7:55 2) On the table below, please circle all locations and times you normally depart from the TV Metro in Boise: 12th & Main Capitol & Main 3ra & Main 8t Lukes Capitol Mall 6:43 6:47 6:50 6:53 6:55 7:13 7:17 7:20 7:23 7:25 7:43 7:47 7:50 7:53 7:55 8:13 8:17 8:20 8:23 8:25 3) What is your scheduled work start time? What is your scheduled work stop time?---:. 4) On the table below, please circle the locations and times you normally board the afternoon schedule of the TV Metro. State Street St Lukes- 3n1 & Idaho Idaho at 9th Idaho & 12th at 5th Jefferson & 1st 4:00 4:05 4:07 4:10 4:13 4:30 4:35 4:37 4:40 4:43 5:00 5:05 5:07 5:10 5:13 5:30 5:35 5:37 5:40 5:43 5) How often do you use the TV Metro Commuter Express? _Daily _3-4 times a week _1-2 times a week _occasionally I Pa{!e 3 10) In addition to adjusting the morning schedule, the afternoon wouid also be adjusted by 10 minutes. Early buses have been filled to capacity and the later buses have light ridership. The change would include an earlier bus, however adding this bus would mean deleting the last bus to make this change possible. After review of the proposed schedule changes, please circle the locations and schedules you would board the buses in Boise if changes are made to the schedule as shown below. PM D rtu S h d I epa re c e u es State Street at 5th 8t Lukes-on Idaho at 3rd Idaho at 9th Idaho at 12th Jefferson at back entrance Old Proposed Old Proposed Old Proposed Old Proposed Old Proposed NEW* 3:40 NEW* 3:45 NEW* 3:47 NEW* 3:50 NEW* 3:53 4:00 4:10 4:05 4:15 4:07 4:17 4:10 4:20 4:13 4:23 4:30 4:40 4:35 4:45 4:37 4:47 4:40 4:50 4:43 4:53 5:00 5:10 5:05 5:15 5:07 5:17 5:10 5:20 5:13 5:23 5:30* 5:40 5:35* 5:45 5:37* 5:17 5:40* 5:50 5:43* 5:53 St Lukes-Meridian Gem St. Meridian NampaP & R Karcher Mall Old Proposed Old Proposed Old Proposed Old Proposed NEW * 4:10 NEW* 4:20 -- -- 4:40 4:40 4:45 4:50 NEW 5:10 NEW 5:20 5:00 5:10 5:10 5:20 5:30 5:40 5:40 5:50 5:30 5:40 5:40 5:50 6:00 6:10 6:10 6:20 6:00* 6:~I 0 6: 15* 6:20 6:30* 6:40 6:40* 6:50 NOTE*On1y four routes will be operated. If this new time is chosen, the last route will be eliminated. 11) After considering the new times, how does this affect your personal afternoon commute schedule? _Better accommodates my work schedule _Makes me adjust my schedule, but willing to adjust _This will really mess me up, so I can't ride _Other (specify) 12) If the adjustments are made, please indicate how likely would you be to continue riding the TV Metro: _Very likely _Somewhat likely _ Unsure _ Unlikely to continue riding 13) Please rate the Treasure Valley Metro service on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being highest rating. On-time schedules Cleanliness _ Driver courtesy Printed Schedules _ Bus Stop Locations _ Parking Facilities Other Comments : Thank you for answering the survey questions. We appreciate your support for the Treasure Valley Metro and are interested in any further comments or suggestions you may have. Please use the other side of the survey, or contact the Commuteride office at 375-POOL with your comments. Please use the attached pre addressed, postage paid envelope attached and mail before December 15, 2000. If the changes are made to the schedule, January 1, 2001 would be the first date of the change. New schedules will be developed and distribution made to passengers the last week of December. o o o ~ .... ~ - ~ ,.Q a ~ ~ ~ ~ I C. = ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ...... ...... = ~ 00. ~ = ~ I "'0 ~ "'0 = = - ~ ...... = a a o u o - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ = > ~ - = rIj = ~ - ~ ( ( _ _ ...~-~ -_ ~ r~: N ~i (t) '.~~~ -~ - -.: --(/)------C,l ('t) ~('I) (t) CN; (t) .N, ~ .~.~....~.. -, ",3 ..> :.- co 0) 0 co- ..q- 0) ~co~ '~;I:!~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~~ ~ _:-: --_ -en 0 0 LO 0 0 I.C) :0-, ~c.OO'r-O'r-ocq ctS .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ;~~:r _ct .=- - <~ ~ ......~..~. .0. - _ - ..., - - ----- 0> ('t') N ("I') ~ 0 ~~: ~~i~~ ~ ~ 0> ~ o):~ _-s...~ co -('t') 0> ("I') LO co ~-co:- JB~- -- LO co N (J) t'- 0 --~- J~ ~::~ ~~ ~.~ .___ :_- :-,__ Q) _ _ 0 ~Of 0 0 ex) 0 --O?~-' - >\ - EA- '~; CD ~ co -.c:t --co- i~ .~~~~~.~ -- 0 (0' 'r_ N N ~~~ :C\I; 647.N ~ co ('t') .M' :(cr u~~; ~~~~~.~ ~~i~1~1~~ili -- j!~!~li~ii o 0- N ~S.' co 'V _~i i:ji~~I~;~~1 - - ~=;;.~;--~~-:- t(~~~;~~~:~~! li~i~il~lii ( ( ~ ~ -- ~ ~ c. ~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ...-... .c ~ M - ~ ,.Q a ~ ..... ~ z ~ ~ . .... ~ e bJ) = -5: -- bJ) ~ = = ~ ~ ~ = = ...-... .c = ....-I ~ ~ ,.Q sa ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ = = ~ ~ ...... ~ >- bJ) = - .... ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ rI:l = ~ Q.. :a till ... ~ ~ ~ iC l' ( ( ( TREASURE VALLEY METRO COMMUTER EXPRESS RIDERSHIP JUNE - NOVEMBER, 2000 2,000 500 1 ,500 1 ,000 o Commuter Rides June lliIl September . July . October DAugust November NOTE: Ridership in November was low on two days, due to holiday schedules. November 10 (Veterans Day) and November 24, the day after Thanksgiving. Funding of the TV Metro Commuter Express after Free Month 140/0 . 860k 1 ( -..:t ~ I ~ C'\I M 0') 0') 0) 0') t"- CO ..- <0 M (I) II) 'V M V M 'V ('t) ..- V 'V ..... :.J -.:t ~ g C (OM..q-r--CCCOv('t)"Ill:tLt) = CW) 10 .0 - I-- = CO M ~ V m 0 o)N ..- N t-- c::! ~ T- 'or- T- T- "f"'* "f"'* = &I) ,... - - Q 0 CO I.t) '" "f"'* Q) C\I CO ..- ,..... &I) M N ~ -.:- T- ..- "f"'* "f"'* ...... ..- ~ ;,;. ..... - I-- Q 0 mO) "f"'* ('t) ('t) N to-- Lt) N ... Q ...- ~ "f"'* ,... .,.... "f"'* ..- ..... ~ ..... ex) N 0) ('I') <0 ,..... 0) CD N ,- M ~ 'V 'V ('I') 'lIll:t ('t) 'lIll:t ("') C'\I V L() ..... ..J -..:t ct t- O t- 10 &.()'lIll:tCOCOCOl.()MLO.........q- M ~ &I) t-- - ~ Q 0) Lt) ..q-CON m Lt) 'or-" ,.- ,.- M ~ ~ ~ ~ .,... ,.- "f"'* ...... .,.... ...... N LD CD ..... - - Q <0 'V vN 0 ('t) 'or- ..q- CO 'V -.:t N ~ -.:- ~~ ~ ~ "f"'* ...... "f"'* N CD ... -- - It) CO (J)U')"""CO 00 COCO C\I M = ,- "f"'* ,.- CO CD fa t-; ~ o a: lU ~ ::t: CI) ~ > o Z m !:: ~ :) en 0 z a: ~ lU J- ~ > W .J ::t: ..J CI) ~ :e w .q: 0::: ::I UJ ~ W e::: ~ l- \.. '\ l> > > > > > > > > > > o 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 ZZZZZZZZZZ I I I I I I I I I I ...-NMCOl'-COmOMv 0000000...-..-...- ! L() ,- 0 m N..q-'V ,...... M ...q- en CI) ..... ..... .,.... "f"'* ,.... co ~ :: g 0 ...- -.q-...-..-..-o.,.......-,.-Q .... G) ~ .... co N - - 0 ...- .......,....NO 0 MLt)Lt) 0 co VJ ~ ..... W .,.... a:: Q. >< W I-- - 2 0 0 'VLt)('t)..-<t-('t)('t)N 0 N N N c( N is .,.... it: w :E CI) '-- - 0 ...- O~...-O"-v'VN N CD m N ..... ...- ~ ...- ~ ~ '-- - 0 N NNNON('t)..q-('t) N N Ut S N N CD e 0 ffi ...- :E LO 00 COL()('t)Lt)COOlL() CD tI) .,.... ..... CD ~ UJ i! UJ w g 0::: a. v OMNN"f"'*OOOOOCO >< W ~ ~ ,... a. :E <C Z I-- - V 'or- NN"f"'*NOONN ,- M v .... N ...... - NO N...-C'\IT-<ON - v 0 0 CD CD ~ ..... N ...... co .,.... ~ I-- V N NMO...-O...-ON NM CI) ~ .... m 0 ..J ...- ~ ~ 0 ~ f- - I- vN -r-('I)......O..-(")O("') N CD W ~ ~ ~ ...J m .... I- :e :::::I ~ :I: U'J > > > > > > > > > > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZZZZZZZZZZ I I I I I I I I I I ...-N('I') (0 I'-CO 0)0 ('I) v OOOOOOO"-"f"'*T- f ( (: ~ o ... COOJCDOr--v"""'"mocn .,.- ~ ....... ,,~VL()"ll::t('l')COCOC:O('t)cn (I)(t)VU')('f)MN(")("')("')('I)U) :.. M :! e OOC"')..-C\l..-Q"-"-NC..- N ... N O"'VCD~Mc.oLt')(")O)vcn ~ ..- an - - O.......-U')..........N..-NM.....CO fN ... .,.- - -- C)U') NLnf"""-CO.......O)I.t)Lt) NLO 0............... 't-............. aD ... - -- O'lllt'O.....N('t)'t-~.......-.....ClO N ... N ..- fa - -- Cl)ON J..; Q Q) NC)N("') Lt) ..... tOM ....... CO ::) M ..... ..... ..... or- ..... G>> ffI~ 0 ~ 0::: a: ~ lU E ~ ~ 2: - ONM..-NO&t) ("')0..-0..... 0 ..- :::l = ..- ..... ..... ..... ,.. ..... ..- ..- ..... C S ~ :z: ~ .... Q 0 CI) ffi ,.. ~ :e NN('t)..........CCN&n<<;'" .. NON..-O,...M.....(f)':;'" .. .. a:t ,., .. . N ~ ca :s! (5 :J: ..-..-O~CX)('I')C)Oa:)CON !I'~..q-VM(")N("')Ll)MC")CO ~ CO) ~ 1'-.....c.cNQJM~c.cC'O.....~ en ..... .....'" ! s ~.......q-..-COO~MN(")an ~ .... .,.- ~ c>> .a o .. u o IOV('f')LOLO.....,.,.....N.....C01t)N ... ..... &I) t-:. -- -- 'VN.....('t').....(")OC..-.....N~ ..q- ... N ..... - -- CNCOIl)N'lll:tCDLt)~('I)a)O 10......................... ,...'t-........... m .... - - ~t')N.....O('t)ON.....NC'\I'" ~ .... ..... ..... !:: en z ~ .... >- W ..J ..J ~ W ~ ::>> CI) < W Q: .... fa '-CCCC")NtDCO('l')..q-U')NO"':;'" ~N,...,..,... ,... 't-"t"-..-.....N OUi ... a: lU E ~ :z: CI) :e .q - - ..q-..-NOOOQ,............NCIO ~ O'J -:;;:-ON,........NMCOO"'-;: ~ .... fnO ffI..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -- 1I)..............a:JCON~COO,......&t)CD Q 't- CD ~ titStitStitititSts13 0000000000 I I I '" I I I I NC"')"lIi"LOCOcnO.....C\lC") 000000,......,-.......... titiuuutitititst5 0000000000 I I I I "1 I I I NC"')~Lt')COmO""'N('I) 000000.......-.......... en ...... en en w a:: 0. r:i z cC C ~ w :E en U) w a:: G. )( W < Q. :E cC z ... 10 ..... .... t! o I- W ~ l: ::l :z: tn It) ,.- I ~ ..q- co ~ co CX) ,...... ~ N ,...... <" CD en 'V M M N C'\I ("') V V <" V t- :.J ", II( b ~ C ~1.C)C"')NVVCCLOC'\I . ~ CW) . an - - C COI"-LOOeJ) ~('I')NN ~ CD Q ~T-T-~ ...... ...... ...... T- N CW) .;; ... - ~ 0 C'\I ...... ~<O CON.,- (]) N N 0 M ~ ~ ~ ...... ~ ...... C .::; ... ~ - 0 N o)COCOf'. 0 N CO ~ CD CJ) Q ~ ...... .,... ...... ...... en ~ ~ I"- (I') f"oo.. ~ .,... ~ 0 ('I) CD 0) UJ ('t) V N ('t) ("I') ~ V 'V C"') (Q :.r M c( b ~ 10 C').,.....q-VMNI.OLOM V .- ... CW) t:. I-- - C I"-"'CON~.COlOm N CD It) ,.....,....,................................. ...... N CD cD ... - - 0 O.,-N CO O)aJoq-lO"-<>> ew') N .,... .,... .,... ...... ...... ...... IIll"- CD ~ -- - &0 V CO(J) ('I') LO"""',.....LO-q-V CD Q II) Ui fa 5 ~ lU E ~ CI) ~ ,..: Q. W In l- e;; z ~ I- >- W ..I .... ~ W 0:: ::J tn c( W a::: I- en S o a: LU E ~ CI) ~ q: a.c.c..c..a.c.c.a.a.a. CD Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) C/JUJUlWOOcncnWcncn ~tbcO~a]~NM~..n ooooa..................~.,- ( ( "'.,.........LOcocom"-"-Q)'IIIli:t' .. U'J............,.. ......~ en m :J g ~ ON......N,....N,........NIONCD N ... N - o ~ ,... NN - ('I)......"IItCONNN N - --- OlON~C"')"""N......""'v"""llllt' N N N ,... (1)0('\1 or- faN a:~ ~ ;c: S sa f5 =e ...... ...... ...... - OC"')IO("')......,..'VN~ N o 'or-' Cf.t :., c 6 ~ mm(J)-VlO,......mcooC"':)-.:- ...... ...... co ; ~ ..... N.......,....,...r-- ...... - ; N ..... .,.... .... ..- 'or-' N ...... - (")..,-." ... - ........ 8.C")......l.ON......'VV.,...V'V~ ...... ...... - ;VIJ)..- (1)0 fa...... a:: ~ ~ == ~ .... .,.. N - V 'V Cri - N.,....,...,...C\I.,-.,-'VCW) ... c..c.c.c.c..a.c.c.c.c. m Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ClJUJwwcncnC/JU)U)CJ) ~t.bcb~a)~NM~a.b ooooo.,....,....,...~.,- - ..... ...... - NN N - ('f')t-- ... UJ UJ W ~ Q. )( W Z III( C ~ w :E "t- ea tn tn W a:: 0- )( W c( a. :E c( z It) t! .... c( t- O .... w .... .... I- ::>> :c tn ..... ~ I ~ LO ,...... co CD CO LO N 0 CO CD en ~ ("') N ("I) N N ('I) ('f') (f') C'\I N Q ,., ~ C COU')U) .q- It)(")MC"l.q- ~ .., .. Iii - - C Nt-- "IIt'm oeU') 0) CD co co c ~ ~ .... ~ 00 Iii - - Q co r-- ~ r-- Q)CD ~ ,......CD 0) ID M ~ .... 00 .::; - - Q C) CO,.......:>> ,......~(t),....OO ID = .... ~ ~ .,- ~ en .:e; U") ('t) ~ ('t') U1 .q- ..q- 0 "lit" 0 ~ ~ ("') ('I) (t) C") Cot) (f) ('t) ('t) M ("') CW) ,., c( b t- ID ...q-~ct).q-~.q-('I)(")..q-U') 00 .. ,., t.:. - - c (f') N~N('t) (Q T- ea cf') co N ~ .,- .... ~ .... .... ~ .... ... UJ ~ - 10-- '0 ,.... "t'- ~ CD ,....,.-Or1t-- ..- II) N ,.... ..- ,.- ~ ~ ,.- ,.- .... c c.a ... ~ ~ an I'- COLOCO ,......~o COO co CD = .... ..- .... ..... U; m 5 o rt: LU ~ ::t en ~ ?- m :J C) ::::) c( l- ii z ~ ... >- W ...I ~ c( :::- w 0:: ::J en < w 0:: I- m 5 o a:: III ~ :r: en ~ q: CJC)C)C)C)C]C)C)C'JC) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <(<(<(<(<(<(4:~<(4: I I . . I I I I I I ....NM-.:r,......CO(j)O.,-~ oococoo,--r-T- .... co ,.... Lt) LtlN,....Lt) Nu)~ . ~ ~ .... ..- ,.... .... ,.... ,.... ,.... ~ ~ ... ... b t- o N ('t)('I)('t)........C"lCOM '-r- U) N N N - - <IlIIt' ,.... N,.......N ,.... .... N C ~ .... .. ~ ..., ~ ~ - ~ N.....,.-..-,....,.... ,.... co en '-.:t 0 ..J fa ,.... ~ a:: 0 ~ i-- - I- ...q- NN ~N.qo,.... ~ C'IfI) w ~ ~ ... ...l 0) t: :& ::e ~ % UJ C)OC)CJC)C)C)C)C)C) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <(<(<(<(q:c:(<(<(<(<( I' . I . I I · I. ,....N(f')~,.....aJ(J)o,.....q- 0000000""''''''''- .~ · d N N 0 Q) M '" 't'- ~ N (I') ~ CD :., i :2 (5 ::I: 0 .- ... M N Q ., ... Vi c C'\I ~("t)(W) N ~ ~ ICI C ,..... ,..... ~ co ~ C') .- CW) ;,; Q C'\I """("')(000 0 't"""' N it l CI) ~ ~ o Q: I.U ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I (f') ~ :; ~ N N (J) ~ i ~ ~ r; N N ~ :2 g (5 3: It) 0 ~Lt)U') V .. .. t.:. CI -.:t ...... CO CO U) II) '" U; Ct U') CO N ('f) CO N .- ~ M c.o &0 C"') ('I') ...,. (f) ~ CI 1If- CD ... ;n Z ~ ... >- W -I ..J 4( ~ W 0: ~ tI) <C W 0:: I- ~ ~ ::) o a: LU ~ ~ J:: CI) ~ q: :i:i3:;'3 .., ..., -, .., ..., cw)~uicb~ 00000 SESS-S3? COC>>O'JOOJ'IIll:t NNNMN~ ~ NNU'lU')Lt)G) ... ......a>>......<ocot- C? mcocor-...o'" C") CNQ)NCCCb .......- ..- ..., ~ It) T- O ,- .... (W) C') C'? C') 10 ~ N(")<Q -..:rl'- N ~ OtnN CO ..... CO ...... T- ,- .... LQ ~CJ) ...... 0 CD CO ..... '" en CO (() EO -.:t ID ,., "333"33 ..., -, ., ., --, . . . . r OT-C'\I('f')~ ..- T- ... ,.... ~ f ( CI) en W 0:: a- )( w c( 4- :E c( z en Cot) 0 1'--0) ~ N ...... 0 co co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en,- .- N ,... CD :." :g i g 15 IJ: I I I ON N~O 10 C') N ... C"J OJ N N 0 N ..- ow- 0 .. OfD-.::rN..q- CD ~ ... .... 0 M ONce) CO NOO CO an 10 N ~ N ,... 0 ,... II) ('t) '" ... Ooq-O(QU1 I.D ~ ... ... ..- T- O ..... It) (')C'\I II- <00 N~-r- " N ... ... 0 ~ CD ~ og N to ... ('t) m U) ('t) 0 0 51>> N sn ~ ..... ~ ..J -1 ~ ~ g '0 J: ~ ~..... N ..... 'f- &D o Ltl ('f).~~ .. ,- ..,. .,- ooo~ ooo&t)C")CO . N ..... ;N NO..-U) QOONCOCO ..- ... 'llIit ,... OONM ~....OOQI.O V 0 ,... ~ ,... "Il:t' or- ~ ...... NONNCCD v en III (/J w 0:: a. t1 z c( Q &: w :E "33"5:33 .., ...., ...., ...., --.. . I , , . (W)~lO<01' 00000 "3"3"3"3'"5 ~-'~"-:l . . . . . O,-N(,,)~ ..... ,... .,- ,... 'or- aO~.f.fO.UIWPI:I l^l. dtI:Tr7 lln " o .... U) W D: a. )( w Z tIC( 2i ~ w :e ~ at (I) m D: D. >< w <C Q. ::e CC Z eo C&) .... .J ~ o t- W .J l- I- ::I :E: CI) ~nw r.d CD ~ 10 ,... <0 ...... ft..- ~ N N C\I N ... .. ~ ~ a a....CQN CD " .0 e ,........ecoco ". a .... . .0 0 r--car--caca ... M ft .. .. C .Q(J).,-Q .. CI ... ~ ... . ~ ~ o a: III ~ ~ f l- e;; Z ~ ... ~ ..I ..J 4( :> w = ::2 U) C W I: .. co lI) 0 N N sa ,., U) C") C') M ~ . ~ ~ g ID ~r-\Q""'ca " ~ IG t.:, c:t .....<Oco.......o co 10 .. C'J .. CI t--(W)o~~ " N .... .... ... ~ ~ 41) .. f.D to anal"......'" C't Q If) Ui fa S o a: III i :e q: c::=cc= =::~::= -,,~....,~ ~..1. . . . I ID co r-- CD m oacao SES9-99v / ; f') co 0 It) 0 it (If) C'J CWJ N (f) ... ItJ (f) C'J N C'I lID .. II) CD co ,.... CD lp . Oat co cor- ... .... ..-Lt)or-CON r-- ~~-r- .... 10 (W) U') ~ 0 0 N Cf) C") ('t) C"') ('I) co ... II) '" It) (f) . . .. CDOlONaa ell .... ..- . r--,....~~N .... ..... ..... ..... ...- .... ,. aal"--U1.an co N ccccc ::::J~~:I -,~~..,~ . . I , , N('IJ~"'CO ... ~ ... ... .... I ( ~ Ii l- e N N ..........co... II)<O,.....CD... ...... C't :., i! ~ fit ,.. .., ~ "r- .... ... ..~" ~N"'cw)C'1"'= N ... C'J co " . = .. D:: a. . . = ~N. Nee ~U)~NN Z ... c N Q ... = w 2: CD C C\I(lfJN~. .. .. . ~ W ,- a: .... a. )C w Z C('I)(f) C':tGl CWJ~~NNG>> . ~ N ID Q C IE .... w :E ('I&nCOll).CD CDN~G)CDO " N fP .., ~ S CIJ CIJ W ~ :2 tC At ...-c-JNC')..-CI: (I)""..., 111 ~ .. ~ ~ :i c z ..... ~ N .... o ~ .... IN ...- ~ ~ ..- (I).... .... C')NNN(l'JN ~ . N at .....NNN ... (W) '" CO ~ 0 -I U) .... ee 1.1I b tr: a. )C ... W ...,-NN .... LO N ~NNI"- W C ....- ~ a- CD :I = c :c z II) ccccc cc:cc= :s==::~ =:t=:2:2 .., -, ..., -, -, -,...,..,-,..., .n'~ac:D N I · I I 0800Q C"2"-"'CQ ,.. ~ 't- ... ~. aO~J:J-O.U~WPI:I 1^1 esr:f11 on nT ~nu r ( i = ... 5 = a; W S.a. ..ell =-=ag E = = ;== ..... = IW..... .a. CD . ell" C; I -- _....=- acnCD I = .. ;i ....., " CD a = .. ..... N = CD '-II .a. cn ell I en :!! ~ ...- .. CD I>> en = .. CD :r - - = ...- .. I>> = en -- ~ at: = .. CD -- = ar .. a I>> .... -- = = (-n *:7 :7 t] -0 ::::::>- 0::::::>- om ::1 9 CD 0 0 ::::) V"l =t < ::::J () S- a> 0 CD 3= :::J CD (/') V> t:ri - 0 ......... o CD -<::::J m <<O"OCDX o __ 0 I "0 =()<V"l ~ (j) O~--f~ 0 (/') 0- 0 -<:: CD ~ =t x- ~ 0... -0- s: o --f (l :3 ~~ (] Q- V"l~~O <_ C 0 ~ -< CD (j)OO(/) ~ 0 0 ::::J ei- S- - -+ CD a> -< ... I>> .. CD -- = -- = .. a I>> ..... -- = = Q 3: ~_ (/) 0 at: n o CD ::J _I = _roo.=- o S. 0 I a ~ 5!!. '< 11::I a 0... g- ~I>> = CD V"l 0 -= "0 ()~ enS 2-~::T=-" c 0... ~ = '" (j)CC:==-= -+CDO-= 30 a -:c; CD .. CD -, CD ~ en en =- = =- l S'9€8 O~OPI/od L1+nos enu8Nv WON ~ISUOJl A L1H l SGV · 01l.l3. 8110^ 8JnS08Jl 'If .A377VA 3l/nSV3l1.l w-==- ( December 14, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL'*MEETING December 19, 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith ITEM NO. 1+ }6-A-2 REQUEST Building Lease - Public Works I Building Department / Planning and Zoning AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANITARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached ItfeJ jL/d/kflJt~ ~ Contacted: Date: Phone: Materials presented at public meetings shaD become property of the CRy of Meridian.. ( ~REC~JVED DEe 1 3 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY CLERK OFFICE Memo To: Mayor Corrie From: Gary D~ Smith, PE CC: file Date: 12/12/00 Re: Building Lease - Public Works/Building/Planning & Zoning Jr~ ~Ce ..',::-... i.,~" .lU. . '" (, / ~ ~, ().t:r~Y 0 \'1 ...:-' ~ , Yo ~s '.. p\ o~ . ";"12 ..( ')?~ l:tl-D oJ!: I:~y Mayor: Attached is the proposed lease for the Hon Building on Watertower Lane to house the Public Works -Building - Planning & Zoning Departments. This lease will provide these departments with much better facilities and some space for growth, beyond the employees we are hiring at this time~ We anticipate being able to move into this lease area by March 1, 2001. I would appreciate it if you cC?uld place this lease agreement on the City Council agenda for December 19, 2000 for Council review, comment and approval. Thanks, . Page 1 From the desk of. . . Gary D. s~ PE Meridian City Engineer Meridian Public Works DepartIrent 200 E CarltonSt, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-26(X) (208) 887-2211 Fax: (208) 887-1297 cd 1ERCIAL LEASE AND DEPOSIT(.CEIPT RECEIVED FROM City of Meridian~ a Body Comorate of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as LESSEE, the sum of $8.948.00 evidenced by check, as a deposit, which shall belong to William A. Hon, ("Lessor") and shall be applied as fITst month's rent. Lessee offers to lease from Lessor the premises (the "Premises") situated in the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho, described as 6,711 square feet of office space in Suite 250 of the building located at 660 E. Watertower Lane (the "Building"), upon the following tenns and conditions: 1. TERM: The term of this Lease will be sixty (60) months commencing April 1, 2001 (the "Occupancy Date"). At any time after the Occupancy Date, within ten (10) days Lessor's request, Lessee agrees to provide Lessor with a written acknowledgment of the Occupancy Date (lease commencement date). Lessor agrees to allow Lessee reasonable access to the Premises prior to the Occupancy Date to install fixtures, a computer, a telephone system and move-in furniture. Further, Lessor agrees to allow Lessee to operate in the Premises upon completion of the tenant improvements outlined on Exhibit B of this Agreement. 2. RENT: Lessee hereby covenants and agrees to pay Lessor, or assigns, the total sum of Five Hundred Seventy Thousand Four Hundred Thirty.Five Dollars ($570,435.00) payable in monthly installments of $8,948.00 for months One through Twelve (1 - 12), $9,227.63 for months thirteen through twenty-four (13 - 24), $9,507.25 for months twenty-five through thirty-six (25-36), $9,786.88 for months thirty-seven through forty-eight (37 - 48), and $10,066.50 for months forty- nine through sixty (49 - 60), herein "Base Rent". All rents will be paid to Lessor or his/her authorized agent, at the following address: William A. Hon~ P.O. Box 190870~ Boise~ ID 83719~ or at such other places as may be designated by Lessor from time to time. In the event rent is not paid within five days after due date, Lessee agrees to pay a late charge of 10% plus interest at 18% per annum on the delinquent amount. Lessee further agrees to pay $25.00 for each dishonored bank check. The late charge period is not a grace period, and Lessor is entitled to make written demand for any rent if not paid when due. 3. OPERATING EXPENSE INCREASES: The Base Rent payable hereunder shall also be annually adjusted upwards beginning on the first anniversary date of the term of this Lease, and each year thereafter, by an amount that shall be Lessee' 5 Proportionate Share of any increases in the Operating Expenses (as that term is defined below) paid or payable by Lessor, or estimated to be paid by Lessor, during the immediately preceding calendar year. As used in this Lease, the tenn "Operating Expenses" means: "Real Estate Taxes" which shall mean and include all general and special taxes and assessments levied upon or assessed against the Building and the land on which it is located (any tax levied in whole or in part in" lieu of or in addition to real property taxes); "Operating Costs" which shall mean all reasonable costs of management, operation, and maintenance of the Building and the land on which it is situated, including without limitation wages, salaries, and compensation of employees; consulting, accounting, legal, janitorial, maintenance, guard, and other services; management fees and costs; maintenance and repairs; and any other costs, charges, and expenses that under generally accepted accounting principles would be regarded as management, maintenance, and operating expenses; "Utility Costs" which shall include the costs paid and incurred by Lessor for all utilities. in connection with the Building, including, without limitation, the costs of heat ventilating and air conditioning, costs of furnishing gas, electricity or other fuels or power sources, and costs of furnishing water and sewer services, Initials: ( ..nd the cost of waste disposal; and ( "Lessee's Proportionate Share" means the percentage equal to the square footage leased to Lessee under this Lease (6,711 square feet) over the total rentable square footage in the Building. 4. USE: The premises are to be used for the operation of governmental offices. and for no other purpose, without prior written consent of Lessor. Lessee will not commit any waste upon the premises, or any nuisance or act which may disturb the quiet enjoyment of any tenant in the building. 5. USES PROHIBITED: Lessee will not use any portion of the premises for purposes other than those specified. No use will be made or pennitted to be made upon the premises, nor acts done, which will increase the existing rate of insurance upon the property, or cause cancellation of insurance policies covering the property. Lessee will not conduct or permit any sale by auction on the premises. 6. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: Lessee shall have the right to sublet all or any portion of the Premises or assign the lease at any time to an Affiliated Person of Lessee, Lessee's partner, a .successor entity created by merger, reorganization, recapitalization, or acquisition, without Landlord's consent or approval. Lessee will not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises to any other party without prior written consent of the Lessor, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Any such assignment or subletting to another party without consent will be void and, at the option of the Lessor, will terminate this Lease. Lessee will not sublease for a profit. If Lessee assigns or sublets, Lessee shall remain responsible for the faithful perfonnance and observance of all of its covenants and obligations set forth in the Lease. 7. ORDINANCES AND STATUTES: Lessee will comply with all statutes, ordinances, and requirements of all municipal, state and federal authorities now in force, or which may later be in force, regarding the use of the premises. The commencement or pendency of any state or federal court abatement proceeding affecting the use of the premises will, at the option of the Lessor, be deemed a breach of this Lease. 8. MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS: Unless otherwise indicated, Lessee acknowledges that the premises are in good order and repair and Lessor warrants that at the time of occupancy the premises are in good order and repair. Lessee shall, at hislher own expense, maintain the interior of the premises in a good and safe condition. Lessor shall maintain all systems and equipment, including electrical wiring, plumbing and heating and air conditioning installations and repairs, and any other system or equipment Tl:1e premises will be surrendered by Lessee, at termination of the Lease, in as good condition as received, nonnal wear and tear and damage from casualty excepted. Lessor will be responsible for maintenance of roof, exterior walls, and structural foundations (including any retrofitting required by governmental authorities). No improvement or alteration of the premises will be made without the 'prior written consent of the Lessor. 9. ENTRY AND INSPECTION: Lessee will permit Lessor or Lessor's agents to enter the premises at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice for the purpose of inspecting the premises, and will pennit Lessor, at any time within ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of this Lease, to place upon the premises any usual "For Lease" signs and pennit persons desiring to lease the premises to inspect the premises at reasonable times. 10. INDEMNIFICATION OF LESSOR: Lessor will not be liable for any damage or injury to Lessee, or any other person, or to any property, occurring on the premises. Lessee agrees to hold Lessor harmless from any claims for damages arising out of Lessee's use of the premises, and to indemnify Lessor for any expense incurred by Lessor in defending.any such claims. Initials: ? - (- II. POSSESSIOr<.( Lessor is unable to deliver the premises to Le.}~"e for the installation of tenant fixrures and furniture by March 1 ~ 2001, Lessor will not be liable for any damage caused by the delay, nor will this Lease be void or voidable, but Lessee will not be liable for any rent until possession is delivered and the tenant improvements are substantially completed. Lessee may terminate this Lease if possession of the premises is not delivered to Lesse~ on or before Aoril 15, 2001. 12. LESSEE'S INSURANCE: Except for such loss or damage as may be caused by the negligent or willful act of Lessor, its agents, or employees, Lessor shall not be liable to Lessee, its officers, agents, employees, customers, invitees or third parties for loss of or damage to property, including good, wares and merchandise, or for injury or death to persons, in on, or about the premises, and Lessee agrees to indemnify and save and hold Lessor harmless from and on account thereof howsoever arising or by whomever caused. During the tenn thereof, Lessee shall maintain in full force and effect with insurance companies "A" rated or better a comprehensive liability insurance policy, naming Lessor as an additional insured,. applicable to the Premises and the activities of Lessee therein with a combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of not less than $1,000,000. A certificate evidencing such coverage and providing that the insurance may not be canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice to Landlord shall be provided to Landlord within ten (10) days from occupancy. Lessee shall maintain in effect policies of insurance covering its fixtures, inventory, equipment and leasehold improvements located on the premises, in an amount not less than one hundred percent (100%) of their full replacement cost, providing protection against any peril included within the classification Special Form Coverage, including insurance against sprinkler damage, vandalism and malicious mischief. 13. LESSOR'S INSURANCE: Lessor will maintain hazard & liability insurance covering one hundred percent (100%) actual replacement value of the Building throughout the Lease tenn. Lessor's insurance will not insure L~ssee's personal property, leasehold improvements, or trade fIXtures.. The foregoing policy of insurance shall be written with rent loss endorsements in favor of Lessor to cover a period of not less than twelve (12) months. 14. SUBROGATION: To the maximum extent permitted by insurance policies which may be owned by the parties, Lessor and Lessee waive any and all rights of subrogation which might otherwise exist. 15. UTILITIES & SERVICES: Lessor will pay for the following services to be delivered to the premises: electricity, water, gas, sewer and trash. Lessor shall provide janitorial services to the Premises five days per week. Lessee shall be responsible with all other services and utilities desired by Lessee, including but not limited to, telephone service. 16. SIGNS: Lessee, at Lessee's expense, shall be permitted to install signage on the front door of the Premises. All signage must be approved by the Lessor prior to installation and must comply with all applicable municipal codes. Lessor shall provide tenant signage on the building directory. 17. ABANDONMENT OF PREMISES: Lessee will not vacate or abandon the premises at any time during the tenn of this Lease. If Lessee does abandon or vacate the premises, or is dispossessed by process of law, or othefVIise, any personal property belonging to Lessee left on the premises will be deemed to be abandoned, at the option of Lessor. 18. CONDEMNATION: In the event that the premises are condemned in whole or in part and the remainder is not susceptible for use by the Lessee, this Lease will tenninate upon the date which the condemnor acquires possession. All sums which may be payable on account of any condemnation will belong solely to the Lessor; except that Lessee will be entitled to retain any amount awarded to h imlber for his/her trade fixtures or moving expenses. 19. TRADE FIXTURES: Any and all improvements made to the premises during the term will belong to the Lessor, except trade fixtures of the Lessee. Lessee may, upon tennination, remove all his/her trade fixtures, but will pay for all costs necessary to repair any damage to the premises Initials: occasioned by~ removal. ( 20. DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES: In the event of a partial destruction of the premises during the tenn, from any cause, Lessor will promptly repair the premises, provided that such repairs can be reasonably made within sixty (60) days. Such partial destruction will not terminate this Lease, except that Lessee will be entitled to a proportionate reduction of rent while such repairs are being made, based upon the extent to which the making of such repairs interferes with the business of Lessee on the premises. If the repairs cannot be made within sixty (60) days, this Lease may be terminated at the option of either party by giving written notice to the other party within the sixty (60) day period. 21. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Lessee will not use, store, or dispose of any hazardous substances upon the premises, except the use and storage of such substances that are customarily used in Lessee's business, and are in compliance with all environmental laws. Hazardous substances means any hazardous waste, substance or toxic materials regulated under any environmental laws or regulations applicable to the property. Lessee will be responsible for the cost of removal of any toxic contamination caused by lessee's use of the premises and indemnify Lessor from any damages caused by Lessee. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this, Lessee shall not be pennitted to store or sell bottled oxygen on the premises. 22. INSOLVENCY: The appointment of a receiver, an assignment for the benefits of creditors, or the filing of a pet~tion in bankruptcy by or against Lessee, will constitute a breach of this Lease by Lessee. . 23. DEFAULT: In the event of any breach of this Lease by Lessee, Lessor may, at hislher option, tenninate the Lease and recover from Lessee: (a) the worth at the time of award of the unpaid rent which had been earned at the time of termination; (b) the worth at the time of award of the amount by which the unpaid rent which would have been earned after termination until the time of the award exceeds the amount of such rental loss that the Lessee proves could have been reasonably avoided; (c) the worth at the time of award of the amount by which the unpaid rent for the balance of the term after the time of award exceeds the amount of such rental loss that the Lessee proves could be reasonably avoided; and (d) any other amount necessary to compensate Lessor for all the detriment proximately caused by the Lessee's failure to perform hislher obligations under the Lease or which in the ordinary course of things would be likely to result therefrom. Lessor may, in the alternative, continue this Lease in effect, and Lessor may enforce all of Lessor's rights and remedies, under the Lease, including the right to recover the rent as it becomes due under the Lease. Lessor may terminate Lessee's right to possession of the premises without tenninating this Lease. In such event, Lessor may retake possession of the premises and relet the premises to a replacem~nt tenant, in which event Lessee shall be liable for any amount by which the rent due and payable under this Lease exceeds rent paid by the replacement tenant, plus Lessor's costs to relet the premises, including leasing c.ommissions and- the cost of tenant improvements. . If said breach of Lease continues, Lessor may, at any time thereafter~ elect to tenninate the Lease. The remedies set forth in this section are cumulative and will not limit any other rights or remedies which Lessor may have. lfthe Lessee fails to appropriate funds as permitted in Section 38 hereof, the remedies available to the Lessor shall be restricted to those described above, provided that once it has relinquished the Project and made any payments due hereunder for its then current fiscal year, the Lessee shall have no further liability under this agreement. 24. OPTION TO LEASE ADJOINING SPACE: In event the adjoining space is vacant or becomes vacant during the term of this Lease, Lessee shall have an Option to Lease the Adjoining Space provided that this Lease remains in full force and effect, and that no default under this Lease has occurred. Lessor shall notify Lessee in writing upon vacation of the adjoining space. Such Option for Adjoining Space will be granted and become effective only if exercised by written notice'to Lessor, and once exercised, is irrevocable. In the event Lessee fa~ls to give such. written notice to Lessor not later than thirty (30) days following receipt of Lessor's written notice, the Option for In i tials: .--" ( Adjoining Sp( nall automatically terminate and expire, and [.",~"ee shall have no further right to exercise the Option for Adjoining Space. Prior to delivery of possession, Lessee shall execute an Amendment to this Lease reflecting the addition to the premises, the additional Base Rent and Additional Rent, the change in ratio of the Premises to the Building area, and any other revisions necessary because of such additional space being added to the original Premises. All other terms and conditions of this Lease shall apply to the additional Premises. 25. DEPOSIT REFUNDS: The balance of all deposits will be refunded within thirty (30) days (or as otherwise required by law), from date possession is delivered to Lessor or hislher authorized agent after expiration of the term of this Lease, together with a statement showing any charges made against the deposits by Lessor. 26. ATTORNEY FEES: In any action or proceeding involving a dispute benveen Lessor and Lessee arising out of this Lease, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees. 27. WAIVER: No failure of Lessor to enforce any term of this Lease will be deemed to be a waiver. 28. NOTICES: Any notice which either party mayor is required to give, will be given by mailing the notice, postage prepaid, to Lessee at the premises, or to Lessor at the address shown in Item 2, or at such other places as may be designated in writing by the parties from time to time. Notice will be effective five days after mailing, or on personal delivery, or when receipt is acknowledged in writing. 29. HOLDING OVER: Any holding over after the expiration of this Lease, with the consent of Owner, will be a month-to-month tenancy at a monthly rent of one and one half (1 1/2) times the current monthly rent, payable in advance and otherwise subject to the terms of this Lease, as applicable, until either party will terminate the tenancy by giving the other party thirty (30) days written notice. . 30. TIME: Time is of the essence of this Lease. 31. HEIRS, ASSIGNS, SUCCESSORS: This Lease is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the heirs, assigns, and successors of the parties. 32. TAXES: Lessor shall be responsible for all real property taxes assessed to the premises. Lessee shall be responsible for any taxes assessed in connection with Lessee's property. 33. PARKING: Lessee shall be entitled to a proportionate share of the parking for the Building; provided, ~essor reserves the right to assign all of Lessee's parking to certain areas in the parking lots for the Building. ' 34. OPTION TO RENEW: Provided that Lessee is not in default in the perfonnance of this Lease, Lessee will have the option to renew the Lease for one ~ additional term(s) of sixty (QQ) months, commencing at the expiration of the initial Lease term. All of the tenns and conditions of the Lease will apply during the renewal term, except that the monthly rent will be at the "thel1" market rent, which shall not be less than the rent for the previous year. The option will be exercised by written notice given to Lessor not less than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the initial Lease tenn. If notice is not given within the time specified, this Option will expire. 35. LESSOR'S LIABILITY: In the event of a transfer of Lessor's title or interest to the property during the tenn of this Lease, Lessee agrees that the grantee of such title or interest will be substituted as the Lessor under this Lease, and the original lessor will be released of all further liability; provided, that all deposits will be transferred to the grantee. 36. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE: (a) On ten (10) days' prior written notice from Lessor, Lessee will execute, acknowledge, and deliver to Lessor a statement in .writing: (1) certifying that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect (Of, if modified, stating the nature of such Initials: - ( modification ( certifying that this Lease, as so modified, is inll.dl force and effect), the amount of any security deposit,- and the date to which the rent and other charges are paid in advance, if any; and (2) acknow ledging that there are not, to Lessee's know ledge, any uncured defaults on the part of Lessor, or specifying such defaults if any are claimed. Any such statement may be conclusively relied upon by any prospective buyer or encumbrancer of the premises. (b) At Lessor's option, Lessee's failure to deliver such statement within such time will be a material breach of this Lease or will be conclusive upon Lessee: (1) that this lease is in full force and effect, without modification except as may be represented by Lessor; (2) that there are no uncured defaults in Lessor's performance; and (3) that not more than one month's rent has been paid in advance. ( c) If Lessor desires to finance, refmance, or sell the premises, or any part thereof, Lessee agrees to deliver to any lender or buyer designated by Lessor such fmancial statements of Lessee as may be reasonably required by such lender or buyer. All fmancial statements will be received by the Lessor or the lender or buyer in confidence and will be used only for the purposes set forth. 37. SUBORDINATION: This Lease, at Lessor's option, shall be subject and subordinate to the lien of any mortgages or deeds of trust now or hereafter placed by Lessor on or against the premises. Such subordination shall be automatic without the necessity of the execution and delivery of any further instruments on the part of Lessee to effecmate such subordination; provided, however, that so long as Lessee complies with the obligations imposed upon Lessee in this Lease, neither Lessee nor its successors and permitted assigns (if approved by Lessor) shall be disturbed or molested in its possession of the premises. Tenant hereby acknowledges that this Lease is subject to the approval of Lessor's mortgagee, and agrees to execute such reasonable modifications and amendments to this Lease as may be required as a condition to such approval or such mortgagee's financing of the premises. Tenant furthere covenants and agrees to execute and deliver upon demand without charge therefor, such further instruments evidencing the subordination of this Lease to any such mortgage or deed of trust as may be required by Lessor or prospective purchasers or mo~gagees fo the premises. 38. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AND RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT LEASE TERM: The Lessee, by entering into this agreement, acknowledges its current intention to make all Lease Payments due hereunder on the dates such Lease Payments are due (but does not commit to a legal or other obligation to make such payments or to incur any liability beyond its then current Fiscal Year). In the event the Lessee's governing body fails to include in its proposed budget or related documents for the ensuing Fiscal Year or fails to appropriate sufficient funds to fully fund all of Lessee's obligations to make Lease Payments hereunder for any future Fiscal Year, then the Lessee will immediately notify the Lessor or its assignee of such occurrence and the Lessee's right to possession of any property constituting the Project, and all its interest in the Project, shall . terminate as of September 30 of the Fiscal Year in which the failure to appropriate occurs. In such case, the obligations of the Lessee and remedies of Lessor shall be limited as provided in Section 23. In the event that the Lessee's. governing body does appropriate and budget funds sufficient to make the Lease Payments for a Fiscal Year then the Lease Term of this Agreement shall be deemed renewed for such Fiscal Year. The Lessee agrees during the current Fiscal Year and during each Fiscal Year that the Lease Term of this Agreement is renewed (i) staff of the Lessee will present for consideration by the City Council of Lessee a budget request for the ensuing Fiscal Year containing an amount sufficient to make the Lease Payments scheduled for such Fiscal Year, (ii) that the City Council of the Lessee shall, for the ensuing Fiscal Year in which the Lease Payments are scheduled to be made, consider a budget request and appropriation of the expenditure of an amount sufficient to allow Lessee to make all Lease Payments due in such Fiscal Year; (iii) that, to the extent funds have been appropriated for the current Fiscal Year, it will make all such Lease Payments; and (iv) that if sufficient funds are appropriated and budgeted by it for the next Fiscal Year for the lease of the Project, then the Lease Term of this Agreement shall be deemed renewed for such Fiscal Year and shall be effective for such Fiscal Year. Initials: - ( Nothing in tl ;ction or elsewhere in this Agreement shall be .u.::emed in any way to obligate the Lessee beyond its current Fiscal Year. If the Lessee fails or refuses to renew the Lease Tenn of this Agreement for the next Fiscal Year as permitted above, makes any payment due for the then current Fiscal Year from funds budgeted and appropriated for that purpose and relinquishes the Project as provided in Section 23 hereof. Then Lessee shall have no further liability under this Agreement 39. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Additional provisions are set forth in Exhibit A.. attached hereto. 40. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: The foregoing constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and may be modified only in writing signed by all parties. The following exhibits are a part of this Lease: Exhibit A: Special Provisions: Owner's Shell and Building Standard Tenant Improvements Exhibit B: Premises Floor Plan Initials: ( (- The undersigned Lessee acknowledges that it has thoroughly read and approved each of the provisions contained in this Lease, and agrees to the terms and conditions specified, and acknowledges receipt of a copy hereof: ACCEPTANCE Lessor: William A. Hon By: Date: Lessee: City of Meridian By: Robert D. Corrie Date: Its: Mayor By: William G. Berg Jr. Date: Its: City Clerk Initials: EXHIBIT A 660 E. W A TERTOWER LANE OWNER'S SHELL AND BUILDING STANDARD TENANT IMPROVEMENTS I. CORE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE PERFORMED BY OWNER The following is a description of the construction work provided by the Owner. A. Owner's Shell Core Structure 1. Structure - The Owner shall construct all of the structural walls, floor slab, and roof of the building, together with all finished exterior surfaces, parking, landscaping and other exterior improvements. 2. Interior Construction - The Owner shall construct all mechanical rooms which serve the structure as a whole. B. Core Mechanical The Owner shan install roofmounted package HV AC units. c. Core Electrical The Owner shall provide complete electrical to all exterior areas including Tenant sign illumination, the main switchgear and meter panels. D. Core Plumbing The Owner shall supply restrooms to confonn with Unifonn building code for specific building use. E. Core Communications The Owner shall supply access to a central communications room for the Tenant's com~unications carrier. Terminal communication panels relating specifically to the Tenant's premises shaH be located outside of the common communications room, and inside the useable area of the Tenant's premises only ifrequired by Tenant. F. Core Fire Sprinklers Owner shall provide fIre sprinkler risers, alanns, lines and one set of heads above the ceiling line. G. Core Entrance and Glazing The Own'er shall provide all exterior glazing which shall be 1" insulated glass with solar grade tinting. H. Hardware Entrance Oeadbolt: Commercial grade locks. . . II. BUILDING STANDARD TENANT IMPROVEMENTS TO BE PERFORMED BY OWNER Initials: ( ON BEHALF L l.~ENANT A. Space Planning The Owner's architect shall do all space planning unless otherwise provided for in the Lease or otherwise agreed to by the Owner and Tenant in writing. B. Building Permits for Tenant Improvements The Owner shall obtain from the governmental entities having jurisdiction the Building Permits required for the construction/installation of the Tenant improvements within the Tenant's premises. The cost of all building and other permits for Tenant's use shall be part of the Owner's contribution to Building Standard Tenant Improvements. c. . Tenant De~ising Walls Tenant demising walls between leased spaces, shall have 6" studs at 16" on center with 5/8" type 'X' gypsum wallboard on each side. Fill cavity with R-19 Insulation. Extend wall to underside of roof strucrure and scribe to fit around obstructions. D. Interior Partition Walls: Shall be provided as shown on attached floor plan with 3-112" studs at 16" on center with 5/8" gypsum wallboard on each side. Extend wall to the underside of the suspended ceiling with a compressible gasket strip and four-way wire bracing and strut per UBC Standard 25-2 for seismic brace. Acoustical sealant to be applied under base plates. Finish to be exposed gypsum board surfaces. E. Interior Tenant Doors Doors, frames and hardware shall be provided as shown on the attached floor plan. Interior doors shall be 3' by 7' by 1-1/4, solid core, paint grade with hollow metal frames. Interior doors, unless pre-fmished, shall be primed and fmished with two coats of semi..gloss enamel paint. F. Interior Wall Finishes Interior fmishes in the office areas shall be gypsum wallboard with light spray texture, one coat of primer and one coat of fmish to cover. Partition walls and interior wall assemblies in offic.e areas shall be finished with 4" vinyl base. G. Hardware Interior partitions shall be furnished with K wikset passage locks or equaL Hardware finish to be US26D or equal. H. Interior Woodwork: Maple wood window sills and skirts. I. Interior Glazing: Not Included in Building Standard Tenant Improvements. J. Floor Covering Floor covering to be selected by Tenant shall be Building Standard 26 oz. Commercial Carpet with 3/8" felt pad and tack strip application ($15~OO per sq. yd. allowance) in office Initials: ( areas. ( K. Ceilings Office ceilings shall have T-Bar ceilings with Building Standard 2'x4' 'USG Fissured SL T ceiling tiles with nONN DX 15/16" grid or approved equal. White fmish (050) on both tile and grid. L. Cabinets and Coffee Bar Owner will provide coffee bars with sinks and lower cabinets as shown on the attached floor plan. Coffee bars to have laminated plastic tops. Cabinets to be building standard plastic laminate. M. Ceiling Fixtures One 2 'x4' lay-in, florescent tube fIXture for every 80 sq. It. of useable area within the Tenant's premises. N. Electrical Distribution 1. Two duplex wall outlets in each office area within the Tenant' 5 premises. 2. Single pole light switch: one per 250 sq. ft. of useable office area of within the Tenant's premises. 3. Battery powered emergency light per code. 4. Building exit light per code. 5. Phone data outlet: one per 150 sq. ft. of useable office area within the Tenant's premises. Phon~ data wiring is not part of the Building Standard Tenant Improvements. o. Fire Sprinklers and Protection System 1.15 sprinkler heads are allowed for each 144 sq. ft. of use able office area within the Tenant's premises. One 5-lb. wall mounted fIre extinguisher as required. P. HVAC Standard multi-zone heating and cooling, adequate for normal office with one standard thermostat per zone. Building Standard Tenant Improvements shall include air distribution, with the necessary connections to make the systems op~rable. Q. Window Treatment: Horizontal wood blinds. Ill. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS TO BE COMPLETED AT TENANT EXPENSE A. Electric Fixtures and Equipment: All electric fIXtures and equipment not included above. B. Gas Connections: All gas connections within Tenant's space not included above. c. Telephone: All conduits for telephone wires or computer networks from the central building panel to the leased premises and in the leased premises. TenantshaIl make all arrangements for telephone service. Initials: ( D. Walls: All special wall covering, glass partitions, or other special construction within the leased area. E. Coves and Ceilings: All special coves and ceilings. F. Furniture and Fixtures: All cabinets, woodwork, fixtures and equipment not furnished by Owner. G. Floor Coverings: All floor coverings above the allowance. H. Painting: Extra colors or special paint I. Alarm Systems: All alann systems or other protective devices. J. Special Plumbing: All extra plumbing or fixtures required for tenant's special needs. K.. Special Ventilation: All ventilation and related equipment, other than standard air conditioninglheating in office space. . L. Hot Water Heater: Except as required for the toilet rooms and coffee bar sink (if.included.) M. Electric Floor Outlets. N. Signs: Sign and installation of sign (copy and design subject to Owners approval). o. All architects' fees above allowance, special licensing fees and city or county permits for interior of Tenant's space. P. ACHD fees above business park rates. Initials: EXHIBIT B ( PRENUSESFLOORPLAN L..J L__--...:..-____J L...J'. . gnRsT F_O~ FL&N '-" VW' - ~-d ~ ~. r- ~ I I I I I I I L. <:) SECOND FUX:R PLAN ~ . t'~ -.- (if) Initials: ~ December 14, 2000 Department Report MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 19 I 2000 APPLICANT City Engineer - Gary Smith ITEM NO. 14 ;6A-3 REQUEST Change Order No.4 by Turnkey Construction for the Digester Project AGENCY COMMENTS CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: SANtT ARY SERVICE COMPANY CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: SETTLERS IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: BUREAU OF RECLAMATION: OTHER: See attached vY OJrF / ~I~ rJVS )" /VO ~. to b OJV~ Contacted: Date: Phone: Materfals presented at public meetings shan become property of the City of Meridian. ( City of Meridian Public Works Dept. RECEIVED DEe 1 5 2000 CITY OF MERIDIAN To: Gary Smith, PE From: Brad Watson, P.E. CC: File Date: 12/15/00 Re: VWVTP Digester/Clarifier Project - Change Order NO.4 The following is Change Order No.4 for the Digester/Clarifier Project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant for City Council's review and approval at their December 19 meeting. Also enclosed is a letter from Keller Associates summarizing the time extension issues associated with the change order. Keller Associates recommends no time extension be included with the change order since none of the items included in it were on the project's critical path. Tum-Key altered the change order when it was sent to them for signature by adding 49 days to the contract period~ The sum of all the labor hours included in Turn-Kay's supporting documentation is only 11.5 person-days. While 49 days does not appear justifiable by any reasonable analysis of the change order, there mayor may not be a few days that are justifiable. We cannot tell at this point, based upon the infonnation received from Turn-Key whether or not this is the case. Some of the work included in the change order was authorized to proceed and has been complete for some time, In the interest of paying Turn-Key what is appropriately due and to bring this project to completion, I recommend the City Council approve the cost increase portion of the change order with no time extension included. The City and Keller Associates will have to work out with Turn-Key any time extension issues during closeout of the project Thank you~ ~~ From the desk of.. . Page 1 Brad Watson, P.E. Assistant City Engineer Meridian Public Works Department 200 E. Carlton St, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642-2600 (208) 887..2211 Fax: (208) 887-1297 watsonb@)ci.meridian.idus { 4~ KELLEK ( ASS 0 C I ATE S 131 S.W. Sth Avenue, Suite A. Meridian, ID 83642 October 23, 2000 Mr. Gary Smith, P.E. City Engineer City of Meridian Department of Public Works 200 E. Carlton, Suite 100 Meridian, Idaho 83642 RE: Digester & Clarifier Facilities Change Order No.4 Dear 9ary, Attached are 3 copies of Change Order No.4 for the referenced project. I previously sent the change order to Turnkey for signature recommending no time extension. It was returned with time extension requests added for every item. Generally time extensions are allowed when critical path activities are delayed. Critical path activities are those that must be completed prior to another task beginning that leads to ultimate project completion. In my opinion, the change order items under consideration are items that were performed simultaneously, or side by side with critical path activities and did not impact overall project completion. For instance, additional fencing work can be performed at the same time as digester mechanical work and have no bearing on pr<?ject completion time. Turnkey feels that every change order item has some impact on the project schedule and therefore every item should receive a time extension. In my opinion, many of the time extension requests by Turnkey are overstated. In summary, the change order item costs are recommended for approval, however, I have not recommended any additional contract time extension allowances. The City may feel differently about this issue and wish to allow some additional contract time. Upon returning one copy to Turnkey the City should either line out any contract extensions and initial tlJe line out, or revise the days and initial. Ed or I can provide input on actual time spent if needea. If you need me to be at the council meeting to explain any of these items please let me know. If you would like to discuss this matter further, please give me a calL Sincerely, KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC. o .,.....c...-y,..~ 'C :.z.- ?'?'2. '>0 '<I.~:.t ~ 01.... (.... --- Dennis Suihkonen, P.E. Cc: Brad Watson, John Shawcroft- City of Meridian Ed Ankeman, Inspector- City of Meridian 197025/2/00...ti93 dg A Company of Professional Engineers and Scientists Ph: (208) 288-1992 · Fax: (208) 288-1999 ( CHANGE ORDER No. 4 PROJECT: Diqester and Clarifier Facilities DATE: 1 0/09/00 OWNER: City of Meridian. Idaho NAME & ADDRESS: City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 CONTRACTOR: Turnkev~ Inc. ENGINEER: Keller Associates. Inc. ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 197040 Yau are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents. Description: See attached Purpose of Change Order: See attached Change Order (Rev 4/89) 197040/1/00-602 052200 ( CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Original Contract Price: Previous Change Orders No.--L to No. ~ Contract Price prior to this Change Order Net (Increase/Decrease) of this Change Order Contract Price with all approved Change Orders CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIME: Original Contract Time: Net change from previous Change Orders Contract Time prior to this Change Order Net (Increase/Decrease) of this Change Order Contract Time with all approved Change Orders APPROVED: RECOMMENDED: Q APPROVED: 197040/1/00-602 052200 ( $ 3.114.996.00 S 33.177.98 S 3.148.173.98 518.092.22 $ 3.166.266.20 365 calendar days 73 438 56 ~ 494 ~NGJNEER OWNER CONTRACTOR .,0 (....IL"'i ~J~ P,,/ fL~J J VI ~/ ~7a Change Order (Rev 4/89) ( CHAJ'GE ORDER NO.4 CITY. OF lVIERIDIAN DIGESTER AND CLARIFIER FACILITIES October 9, 2000 PROPOSED CHANGES AND JUSTIFICATION Item 4-1 Fencing and Gate Provisions $2_552400 )t- City staff requested that the fencing shown on the original contract drawings be moved further to the south to align with fencing placed around the new vehicle storage area. This resulted in 1 00 feet of additional fencing to be placed and required additional leveling of grade along the south boundary to place the fence. The City also furnished one additional double swing gate to be installed by Turnkey. +\M 10 ~ s- -\-0 <i~o~\- Item 4-2 Add Hot Water Isolation Valves $2. 715. 1 0 Jv The thermophilic process heat exchangers (.:2) were not provided with hot water piping isolation valves on the drawings. Two isolation gate val'ves were added for each heat exchanger (hot \vat~r inlet and outlet) for a total of 4 additional 6-inch valves. ~~ <0 ~~ -\-0 ~+ Item 4-3 Relocate 8-inch Digester Overflow Line $1.235.04 ,bY The digester overflow discharge line conflicted with the digester building roof line and needed to be connected below the roof line. This resulted in additional fittings and pipe length to avoid the conflict. ~od. ~ 6~'~ ~~~~+ Item 4-4 Add Expansion Tank BracinQ $ 436.06 &y The new expansion tank bracing sho\\TI mounted to the wall needed to be improved as insufficient wall rebar existed at the location to support the tame As a result two vertical braces were extended to the floor to provide additional support. ~Q \..CJ ~~ ~ ~~~ Item 4-5 Add NPW Pum Platfonn and Pi ing $1.921.18 Upon draining the post aeration basin to install the NPW submersible digester cooling water pump it was determined that there was insufficient room adjacent to the existing air header to install the pump. As a result, a steel platfonn had to be fabricated to allow mounting of the pump above the air header. In addition, plant staff requested that the suction line outside the basin be fitted with a stub and camlock fitting so that the digester cooling line could continue to be used from the chlorine contact basin if the post aeration basin were bypas~ed M~ Lf ~"'t~ ~ ~ ~--k..".~_-+ 197040/1/99-686 be 012000 ( ( Item 4-6 Valve Box and Di2:ester PininQ Mods. $1.845.99 .~ An existing underground valve box conflicted with laying of hot water piping from the new digester building to the existing digester building. The valve box concrete had to be removed to allow installation of the hot water piping. Other piping modifications included under this item included addition of a 14-inch victaulic cap to the RAS line and modification to the digester scum buster nozzle and one mixing svstem nozzle which needed to be extended to clear digester cover and corbel conflicts. ~~ - 4. d.~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~"y.: ~ ~ Item 4-7 Waste Gas Burner Additions $5.694.?0 Electrical wiring to the waste gas burner was inadvertently omitted from the contract drawings and needed to be connected from the digester control building. In addition, the burner flare and pilot gas piping could not be connected as sho\\11 on the drawings due to the configuration of the flare. As a result, modification~ of the pilot.gas piQing were necessary. ~ ~ <i~~ ~ ~~~"""- ~ Item 4-8 Reroute Purifier Air Line $ +673.90 The ~-inch purifier air line needed to be rerouted from the compressor to the air control panel on the purifier and then to the injection point. The supplier erroneously indicated during design that the line be routed directly to the injection point. f\~ Lf d/~:s- -+c (\~.\Jk."'-.;+ Item 4-9 Miscellaneous Electrical Items a) Add diQester relay $ .284.13 The digester low gas pressure signal needed to be split to go to both dewatering pump starters in~tead of one 1fS shoVvn. A relay needed to pe added to facilitate the signal split. ~ :L a.~~ .~ ~~~t- b Add time delav relav to dewaterin2: urn s . $ 634.87 if" A time delay relay needed to be added to the dewatering pumps to override the suction piping flow switch (triggered. by zero flow) for startup of the dewatering pumps. M~ Lt ci~~ -+a Q~~ ~' c) Change wire to l-TSP $ 99.75 fj The wiring for the cooling water temperature switch loop was revised from 3 # 12 wires to one twisted shielded pair for input to the ?vleso PLC for PLC control. ~ \ ~""'t ~ ~Q~-\- 197040/1/99-686 be 012000 ( TIME EXTENSION · Jj1/ ~J.oR8 ofth€: abG~!€ item~ appeared to impOI('t th'" r-ntical path cOlu:truction of the project and IJ' tiR1~ evt~nsion appears ~lrarranted. 197040/1/99..686 be 012000 . / ( Item Packet Picku\..., ~ 8 ~ ~ C'-J ~ f;I4 ~ ~ o <-> ~ ~ LLt ~ 6 ~ o I- W W :I: Zen <(~ - I Cz -C) ~- wen ~C) u.~ O~ >-W J-:I: -U U_ -I ,CO ::> a. LU (J <:~ O~ :z: · ( Q..~ .~ '\;.!; Q CI) 2- CI)~ lJJ g J 000 ~" l/l ( N1 I ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ I '~~ ~, -~j ~ ') ~. ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ r '\.J ~~ ~ .~~ ~ ..-..-... '\j ........ - .:. . I '~ '::J- ~ ~ :J- ~ ~ ~ ::::r Y) K ~ \' rp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ \:. .a V ,'J ~ \J.) .~ ... ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \. \ \ \5 <: -..-.....:: lU f'... ~ ~ (' ~ ~ ~ ~ \~ J 'l~ ~ tI ~.~ ~(E '] I I IV ~ ILU ~ ~ ~j (!) ~ VII. " ~ ~ JI ~ :l GjI~&:1 \j w ~ i ~ ,-J I 0... I o C) ~ ~ c::> ~ 4::) ....... C"J ~ ~ ~! o u 0 r:a ~ ~ o I- W W J: ZOO <~ - I Cz -e> 0:::- WOO :Ee> u..~ o~ ~~ -u u_ -J aJ => a. ( ( ~ '~ ~~ ~ C>~ Z~ ~ -Cl I- ILl! I W /'" ~ ~!~ B..~ I Q " i o 2t7g@ ~ C'.I ~ ~ U") ~ (.) I ~ r ..... ""' u r.;z;.. :::;1WO ~ C t:; o ( (- I- W W :I: ZOO <(2 -- O. _2 ~C) We;; ~C) u.~ 00::: ~~ U ~ i~ ..J OJ 1 a: ~