The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025-12-16 Regular Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader, Vice President Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, December 16, 2025 at 6:00 PM The City of Meridian is committed to providing equal access to all public meetings. If you need accommodation, an alternative format, or language assistance to fully participate, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@meridiancity.org 72 hours prior the scheduled meeting. Materials presented at public meetings are subject to disclosure pursuant to the Idaho Public Records Act. Public Meetings of the Meridian City Council are streamed live at https://meridiancity.org/live and can be joined virtually at https://bit.ly/meridianzoommeeting Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ABSENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilwoman Liz Strader PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted as Amended (Vacate items 14-18) CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the December 2, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the December 2, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Tanner Creek Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0170) 4. Tanner Creek Waltman Lane Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0172) 5. Final Order for Reveille Ridge No. 1 (FP-2025-0007), by Kent Brown Planning Services, located at 7355 S. Eagle Rd. 6. Final Order for Baratza Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2025-0025) by The Land Group, located at the southeast corner of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. McMillian Rd. 7. Final Order for Mondt Meadows Subdivision (FP-2025-0026) by Gregg Davis, Breckon Land Design, located at 6101 and 6152 S. Tarrega Ln. 8. Community Center Permanent Sidewalk Easement Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian 9. Community Center Temporary License Agreement for Work in The Right of Way Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian 10. Amendment #1 to Interagency Agreement for Roadway Construction/Water and Sewer Construction, Ustick Rd - Ten Mile Road to Linder Rd, ACHD Project # 521052 11. Resolution 25-2555: A Resolution amending the City of Meridian Records Retention schedule; and providing an Effective Date 12. Resolution No. 25-2559: A Resolution Amending the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan to Adopt by Reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024); Adopt by Reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as Incorporated Therein; Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference," Including Minor Cleanup and Ensure the Most Current Adopted Plans and Studies are Referenced; Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to Add/Modify Language; and Providing an Effective Date ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] PUBLIC FORUM Members of the public may address elected officials regarding topics of general interest, concern, or other public matters provided they are not related to current or future public hearings. Those who sign up in advance of the meeting may be allotted up to three minutes to speak. No further discussion or debate may take place, but the topic could be added to a future meeting agenda at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. DEPARTMENT REPORTS \[Action Item\] 13. Resolution No. 25-2558: A Resolution Establishing the Appointment of William (Bill) Baber to Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission; and Providing an Effective Date Approved Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Little Roberts, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener 14. Addendum to State & Local Agreement Between City of Meridian and the Idaho Transportation Board by and through the Idaho Transportation Department for the Rail with Trail Pathway Vacated 15. Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Amendment in the Amount of $183,955.00 for Rail with Trail Pathway Construction Vacated 16. Agreement Between Owner and Contractor for Construction Contract (Stipulated Price) Between City of Meridian and Mountain Companies, LLC for the Rail with Trail Pathway Vacated 17. Employee Health Benefits Trust Quarterly Update Vacated 18. Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Amendment in the amount of $781,110.00 for Employee Benefits Trust Plan Vacated PUBLIC HEARINGS (Action Item) 19. Public Hearing for Fiscal Year 2026 Water and Sewer Rate Increase 20. Resolution No. 25-2551: A Resolution Adopting FY2026 Public Works Water and Sewer Rates and Fees Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener 21. Public Hearing for Borough Village (H-2025-0037) by Engineering Solutions, LLP., located at 1250 E. Everest St. Approved Application Materials https://bit.ly/H-2025-0037 A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to the existing development agreement (Inst. #105152707 Westborough Square) to update the use (from office to residential) and development plan for the site and enter into a new agreement for the subject property. B. Request: Rezone of 3.04 acres of land from the L-O to the R-15 zoning district C. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of three (3) buildable lots and three (3) common/other lots on 2.81 acres of land. D. Request: Planned Unit Modification to the approved PUD (CUP-05-027) to update the development plan for the site from six (6) office buildings to 18 multi-family residential dwelling units and two (2) single-family residential dwelling units. E. Request: Director Approval of alternative compliance to UDC 11-3B-7C.1c to not provide street buffer landscaping along E. Chinden Blvd., adjacent to the site due to the location of the 10-foot wall constructed by ITD with the roadway expansion. Motion to approve made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener 22. Public Hearing for Apex Cadence (H-2024-0061) by Brighton Corporation, generally located south of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and west of S. Locust Grove Rd., including 6575 S. Locust Grove Rd. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0061 A. Request: Modification to the existing Development Agreement (Inst. #2020- 178120) to replace it with a new agreement for the subject property and to include specific design requirements. B. Request: Annexation of 0.86 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district. C. Request: De-Annexation of 0.52 acres of land from the City to Ada County. D. Request: Rezone of 56.11 acres of land from the R-8 to the R-15 zoning district. E. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 228 single-family residential building lots, 41 common lots and 16 other lots on 51.50 acres of land in the proposed R-15 zoning district with private streets in the gated portion of the development. F. Request: Planned Unit Development with a request for deviations to certain street, side, and rear yard building setbacks and to allow more than 100 dwelling units in a gated community. Motion to approve made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener 23. Public Hearing for Apex Zenith (H-2025-0041) by Brighton Corporation, generally located at the southeast corner of Meridian Rd. and Lake Hazel Rd., in a portion of Lot 4 Section 6, T.2N., R.1E. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2025-0041 A. Request: Preliminary Plat to subdivide two (2) existing parcels into seven (7) buildable lots across 11.549 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. B. Request: Private Street application that is naming the drive aisles. Motion to approve made by Councilman Whitlock, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener 24. Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm Townhomes (H-2024-0072) by Brighton Corporation, generally located at the corner of S. Tavistock Ave. and E. Hill Park Street with the inclusion of the following parcels: R3636090060, R3636090040, R363080240, S1133212576 and R3636080110. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0072 A. Request: Rezone of 5.45 acres of land from the C-N zoning district to the R- 15 zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 70 homes and 18 common lots spanning across 9.126 acres. C. Request: Development Agreement Modification to supersede the existing development agreement. Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Little Roberts, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock Voting Nay: Councilman Cavener FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 9:25 PM Meridian City Council December 16, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:06 p.m., Tuesday, December 16, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, John Overton, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Members Absent: Liz Strader and Doug Taylor. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Caleb Hood, Nick Napoli, Laurelei McVey, Jamie Leslie, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock X Anne Little Roberts X John Overton Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it's Tuesday, December 16th, 2025, at 6:06 p.m. We will begin tonight's regular City Council with roll attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next up is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you would all, please, rise and join us in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: Next up our community invocation, which tonight will be delivered by Pastor Vinnie Hanke with the Valley Life Community Church. If you would all, please, join us in the community invocation or take this as a moment of silence and reflection. Hanke: Mr. Mayor, Members of the City Council, thanks once again for allowing me to be here to pray before the meeting and Merry Christmas to you all. Simison: Merry Christmas. Hanke: Thank you. God, I thank you for this evening. I thank you for the City of Meridian and the privilege of being a citizen of it. God, I ask tonight as the Council conducts its business and hears from those who will give testimony that you would give them wisdom, discernment, you allow them to lead in a manner that is consistent with Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 2 of 57 the humility and service that you yourself provided that we celebrate in this Christmas season. We thank you for our fair city. We ask for your providence and grace to be upon it and we thank you for this time, in Christ's name. Amen. God bless you guys tonight. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Hanke: My pleasure. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Okay. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: We have to make a couple of changes. Notably we are going to vacate Items 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 from the Department Reports. We got those handled during our special meeting and, then, Mr. Mayor, I know we were at least anticipating a -- a larger turnout tonight for some of our public hearings. I know the applicant for No. 21 maybe thought that they would maybe be later into the agenda. In light of us not having a packed house with public hearings, we would like, Mayor, if you are comfortable with this is we will keep the rest of these public hearings as published, but maybe provide some flexibility, if you are open to it, Mayor, to -- if the applicant's not here for No. 21 we will just kick them down a notch. Does that work for you, Mr. Mayor? Simison: It works. Cavener: With that, Mr. Mayor, I move that the modified agenda be adopted. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the agenda as modified. Is there discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to as modified. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the December 2, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the December 2, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 3 of 57 3. Tanner Creek Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0170) 4. Tanner Creek Waltman Lane Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0172) 5. Final Order for Reveille Ridge No. 1 (FP-2025-0007), by Kent Brown Planning Services, located at 7355 S. Eagle Rd. 6. Final Order for Baratza Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2025-0025) by The Land Group, located at the southeast corner of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. McMillian Rd. 7. Final Order for Mondt Meadows Subdivision (FP-2025-0026) by Gregg Davis, Breckon Land Design, located at 6101 and 6152 S. Tarrega Ln. 8. Community Center Permanent Sidewalk Easement Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian 9. Community Center Temporary License Agreement for Work in The Right of Way Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian 10. Amendment #1 to Interagency Agreement for Roadway Construction/Water and Sewer Construction, Ustick Rd - Ten Mile Road to Linder Rd, ACHD Project # 521052 11. Resolution 25-2555: A Resolution amending the City of Meridian Records Retention schedule; and providing an Effective Date 12. Resolution No. 25-2559: A Resolution Amending the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan to Adopt by Reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024); Adopt by Reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as Incorporated Therein; Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference," Including Minor Cleanup and Ensure the Most Current Adopted Plans and Studies are Referenced; Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to Add/Modify Language; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Next up is the Consent Agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 4 of 57 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we approve the Consent Agenda, for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. PUBLIC FORUM Simison: Mr. Clerk, anything under public forum? Anyone signed up? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, nobody signed up. DEPARTMENT REPORTS [Action Item] 13. Resolution No. 25-2558: A Resolution Establishing the Appointment of William (Bill) Baber to Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Okay. Then we will go into Department Reports. First item up is Resolution No. 25-2558, a resolution establishing the appointment of William Bill Baber to Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission. Council, Chair -- Chair Person Corey and I sat down, as always, and did our due diligence on the quality of applicants. I'm going to let the cat out, we only had one applicant, but it was a stellar applicant for this. For those that haven't had the opportunity to meet Bill and understand his -- the public service he has provided in his previous communities he has lived in -- he has sat in your seats, he has dealt with the issues at that level different and he understands that we are in a different place with our -- our contractual process and everything else, but he is willing to roll up his sleeves and provide the service to our communities and, as he said, no job is too small or too dirty to get involved in and understand the work he is getting himself into. So, he has got a great background and I think that continues to add expertise to our Solid Waste Advisory Commission and with that we would be happy to have him participate in this commission and stand for any questions you may have. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 5 of 57 Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, I have the privilege of knowing Bill and had a very interesting and thoughtful discussion with him prior. I think he tested my knowledge on how much I knew about our Public Works and so if no one else has any discussion it would be an honor to get to nominate him and I move that we pass Resolution 25-2558, a resolution establishing the appointment of William Bill Baber to Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission and providing an effective date of today. Overton: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Resolution No. 25-2548. Is there discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Simison: Bill, would you like to make any comments this evening? Baber: Thank you, Mayor and Council, for this honor and I'm looking forward to talking trash in Meridian. Simison: Thank you, Bill. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Action Item) 19. Public Hearing for Fiscal Year 2026 Water and Sewer Rate Increase Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to our public hearings for the evening. First item up is Item 19, which is a public hearing for fiscal year 2026 water and sewer rate increase. I will turn this over to Director McVey. McVey: All right. Good evening, Mayor and Council. No presentation, but this is just follow up. We presented in early November on the Enterprise Fund of the health check of the fund and our proposed rate increases. We have since published the increases in the newspaper and also in the utility bills and we have received no public input or feedback. Just a quick recap. A slightly different strategy on our rate increases, rather than just straight across the board we are going with the nine, four, three, one plan that we discussed, meaning nine percent on the base of water, four percent on the use of water, three percent increase to the wastewater base and one percent increase to the wastewater use. Importantly, in aggregate that equates to about a 2.6 percent increase, which is $1 .66 per month increase to the average Meridian resident. So, with this rate increase we still maintain our position as the lowest rates in the valley, which is not an insignificant feat and we are essentially looking for your approval this evening to move forward with that proposal with an effective date of January 1 st. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 6 of 57 Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Clerk, did anyone sign up to provide testimony on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we had nobody sign up. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present in the audience or online who would like to provide comments during this public hearing on this item? If you are online you can use the raise your hand feature. Seeing no one coming forward or raising their hand, do have a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I move that we close the public hearing on Item 19. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public meeting. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 20. Resolution No. 25-2551: A Resolution Adopting FY2026 Public Works Water and Sewer Rates and Fees Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move that we approve -- we are on Item 28. Move we approved number -- Resolution No. 25-2551 , resolution adopting the fiscal year 2026 Public Works water sewer rates and fees. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Resolution No. 25-2551. Is there a discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, absent; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 7 of 57 21. Public Hearing for Borough Village (H-2025-0037) by Engineering Solutions, LLP., located at 1250 E. Everest St. A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to the existing development agreement (Inst. #105152707 Westborough Square) to update the use (from office to residential) and development plan for the site and enter into a new agreement for the subject property. B. Request: Rezone of 3.04 acres of land from the L-O to the R-15 zoning district C. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of three (3) buildable lots and three (3) common/other lots on 2.81 acres of land. D. Request: Planned Unit Modification to the approved PUD (CUP-05- 027) to update the development plan for the site from six (6) office buildings to 18 multi-family residential dwelling units and two (2) single-family residential dwelling units. E. Request: Director approval of alternative compliance to UDC 11- 3B-7C.1 c to not provide street buffer landscaping along E. Chinden Blvd., adjacent to the site due to the location of the 10-foot wall constructed by ITD with the roadway expansion. Simison: And since we do have our applicant here we will just go in regular order where the next item up is Item 21, which is a public hearing for Borough Village, H-2025-0037. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Caleb Hood representing the city this night on -- tonight on the Borough Village project. I'm going to run through the -- this outline for this project and, then, the applicant is here, so they will give their testimony. But the applications you have before you tonight are a development agreement modification, a planned unit development modification, a rezone and a preliminary plat and I will just say if I get some shorthand, so DA mod is the development agreement modification and PUD is kind of the shorthand for the planned unit development application that's associated with these applications tonight. So, the site consists of approximately three acres of land currently zoned L-O or limited office, located at 1250 East Everest Street. So, that's on the south side of Chinden just west of Locust Grove as you can see on the slide. In 2015 applications were submitted for a rezone to R-15 and a modification of the PUD to change the use and site layout from office to multi-family residential for the development of 34 townhome style units at a gross density of 2.55 units per acre. That application was denied by the Council. In 2016 a short plat application was submitted and approved for the subject property and adjacent property to the east, which included the eastern portion of the vacated right of way from Jericho Road. These exhibits don't show up very well, but Jericho Road used to connect up with Chinden Boulevard and, then, was vacated associated with this Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 8 of 57 project. A 35 foot wide landscape buffer was -- with irrigation a ten foot wide multi-use pathway and a ten foot berm and wall was constructed along Chinden with the subdivision improvements as required by the DA. It was later removed and modified by ITD with the Chinden Road winding project that occurred here a few years ago -- a handful of years ago now. ITD had to acquire about ten additional feet of right of way from the subject property and they installed a ten foot tall concrete wall for buffering, along with decorative rock on the south side of Chinden Boulevard in this area. Utilities were also installed where some of that landscaping once existed and includes transformers, underground power and natural gas line between the back of the sidewalk or multi-use pathway and the wall. The Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation -- you can see in the middle exhibit on this slide is mixed use community, which basically means it's integrated community serving employment and residential uses that are desired in this designation. The residential components are expected to comprise between 20 and 50 percent of the overall MUC development area, with gross densities ranging from six to 15 units per acre. So, summary of the request. The applicant is proposing to modify the existing development agreement and PUD for West Borough Square to update the use from office to residential and a conceptual development plan from the six office buildings that were approved in 2016 to 18 multi- family residential units and some single family residential attached style structures on two lots with the new development. A variety of community survey uses exist in the overall MUC designation. So, going back you can see that brown -- basically encompasses the entire roughly quarter to about half mile or so of the frontage along Chinden Boulevard and there is a mix of usage generally today on those properties that show the MUC designation. There is a rezone that is requested of 3.04 acres from, again, the L-O -- currently L-O zone to the R-15 or medium high density residential zoning district. The reason cited in the applicant's narrative, support the proposed rezone and change of use include the lack of collector street access to Jericho. So, again, Jericho previously was due north of here and intersect with Chinden Boulevard. The lack of visibility from the highway. So, I mentioned the ten foot wall that exists now and they also cited that the property is isolated due to its office zoning and -- and access, again, issue there. I will let the applicant, obviously, expand on some of that. There is also a preliminary pat -- preliminary plat, excuse me, which is proposed to develop in one phase. There are six total lots with three building lots -- and, again, one of those lots is for multi-family and two for single family and, then, there is three common lots that are -- that include the access drive, some parking, and a common lot on 2.81 acres of land. So, again, the discrepancy between the rezone and that is the right of way basically for Chinden Boulevard. The 2.81 acres is the -- the area of the plat. The single family lots range in size from 4,176 to 4,228 square feet. The average is about 4,220 square feet. The multi-family lot will contain nine structures, with 18 kind of duplex style lots as you can see on that right-hand exhibit. Those are attached. Technically multi-family, because all of them are on one lot, but it's really two units per building, consistent -- so, the density is 6.58 dwelling units per acre. So, again, the range anticipated in the MUC designation six to 15 and at 6.58. No deviations are proposed to the UDC standards with the modification to the planned unit development. Private usable open space. Consists of patios for each unit in excess of 80 square feet minimum requirement. A minimum of 4,500 square feet or .10 acres of common open Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 9 of 57 space is required per -- for the development. The applicant is providing open space exceeding the standard by more than double the amount. A minimum of two amenities are required from two separate categories. A sports court and a horseshoe pit is proposed from the recreation category and the fenced dog park with a waste station is proposed from the quality of life category. A picnic area with shade structure is also proposed from the open space category, again, exceeding the UDC requirements. Off- street parking is proposed in excess of the minimum standards. So, 51 spaces are proposed or provided for the required amount, with another 16 spaces provided in an overflow parking lot, along the southern boundary of the site for use by guests and residents. A 35 foot wide street buffer -- and this kind of goes into what is required, was required with the Planned Unit Development and development agreement. Chinden Boulevard is an entryway corridor with noise abatement requirements for residential uses adjoining that state highway. US 20-26. As previously noted ITD removed the previously installed buffer wall and irrigation with the road widening project and constructed a ten foot tall concrete wall at the back edge of the ten foot sidewalk along Chinden, leaving little area for a landscape buffer and no irrigation on the north side of the wall. The applicant did request alternative compliance. I worked with -- Sonya is actually the lead planner on this, but talked with her about the alternative compliance request and did approve that due to conflicts, again, with those utilities, which prevented the installation of irrigation facilities and putting in the wall. There is no break in that wall. It's a pretty continuous wall. I know I went pretty quick through the -- the pictures. I think there was a pretty good one. You can see on the lower left a picture of the existing -- what ITD installed. It kind of comes across a little bit in that picture, too. But the elevation is -- there is -- there is some grade changes between the highway and the subject site. So, that was also a consideration, is that alternative compliance was reviewed and approved. The developer is installing nine additional trees north of the retaining wall with shrubs, decorative boulders and rock mulch and four additional trees on the south side of the retaining wall. Conceptual building elevations -- so, there is some of the common open space. I'm sorry, I'm not synced up with my notes and the slides. The conceptual building elevations for the proposed single story homes. And, in summary, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard this project on November 20th and did recommend approval to the -- to the Council. In favor were Becky McKay from Engineering Solutions, Jack Harris. In opposition were Drew Robert and Forrest Spencer. Commenting was Tyler Rountree. Written testimony was received by Melissa Chandler, Melinda and Ray Akhbari, Ginne Hostvedt and John Elliott. Some of the key issues of concern were some of the safety concerns for children and pedestrians. With the increase of the density here and residential uses, the increase in traffic. Some concerns about the number of parking stalls proposal and if it was inadequate. Increased traffic volumes on surrounding roads. Not being designed to handle that and noise in the quiet neighborhood and the incompatibility with surrounding land uses and strain on city services. There is also a request for a conversation about the desire slash need for a traffic signal on Chinden. I will -- want to spend just a second now I think on that, so that the first exhibit you can see basically the mid mile between Locust Grove in Meridian -- that is the plan for -- for access on Chinden is to basically at the mid mile put in signals. The warrant is not currently met for that -- for a signal. Eventually I -- I am hopeful that someday you can funnel traffic to what's called Saguaro Drive and that will Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 10 of 57 be signalized at some day, but right now there isn't enough volume to warrant that signal today. But that was something that was requested and, again, discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, so -- there was also some discussion by the Commission about the installation of no parking signs along the entry drive to reduce that congestion, some additional extra parking with the development and encouraging the applicant to continue to work with the abutting Hightower HOA to improve the strip of land that is vacated right of way on their property -- what was Jericho for a larger shared common area between the two developments. So, the Commission did, in fact, include a new condition requiring no parking signs be installed along the common drive entry, shared with the multi-family development to the east. So, let me get there again so you can kind of see what that looks like. Aside from that there is no known additional issues to note and I did just check and I didn't see any additional written testimony since the hearing in November. So, with that staff will stand for any questions, clarifications we may have. Simison: Thank you, Caleb. Council, any questions for staff? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Caleb, just one quick one. In that MUC area what percentage is residential already? Hood: So, Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, I don't have that right in front of me. It may be in the staff report somewhere. I can look that up. I will take a look at the zoning map, you know, rough proportionate of -- the pink is going to be commercial, so -- and, then, the -- the orange is a higher density residential and, then, there are actually two county properties there. The Zamzow's and the Friendship Celebration Church are the two white ones that are near -- further to the west. Cavener: Yep. Hood: So, largely -- it's largely nonresidential. The church is actually zoned. So Valley Life Church, which is on the corner and Locust Grove and Chinden shows up as two tones of yellow, but that's actually a church and the darker shade of yellow is undeveloped land, but that is technically zoned residential. If you want percentages I can try to find that, but -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Caleb, it's probably not the end of the world, but it looks like it's very heavy residential, but you are saying that it's not. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 11 of 57 Hood: There are certain residential uses there. The zoning is misleading I guess is what I would say, because, again, the vast majority of the yellow that you see that would overlap with the MUC -- so, as you can see kind of on the exhibit in the middle, which is our Future Land Use map; right? The church is called on that civic green color -- Cavener: Yep. Hood: -- but their zoning is yellow. So, they have to have a zone. We don't have a church zone, so they have a residential zone, so kind of looking at those in combination. There certainly is some residential. I think the future land use map shows the existing platting patterns or parcel lines and you can see at the mid mile there are certainly some residential there. Along the frontage of Chinden, though, you do have some commercial uses as well. Cavener: Okay. Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. McKay: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Becky McKay. Engineering Solutions. Business address 1029 North Rosario in Meridian. I'm here representing Challenger Development on this particular project. We are requesting a rezone of 3.04 acres from L-O, limited office, to R-15 medium density residential. We have before you a preliminary plat, which is 2.81 acres with two single family homes, nine duets on a common drive and overflow parking as one lot. Simison: I think the mic went out on the -- McKay: Did it go out? Simison: Yeah. The green light is not -- McKay: The green light is on here. Simison: Yeah. It's not on the -- yeah. I think that -- we maybe go to the other mic. McKay: How is this one? Simison: That's fine. Yeah. McKay: So, here is a vicinity map of the subject property. As you can see it's located just south of Chinden Boulevard, Highway 20-26 and, then, west of Locust Grove you have Saguaro that comes in off of Chinden and, then, there is interconnectivity that goes out to Commander. This is an aerial map as you can see of the subject property. You can see here the parking lot is all developed. The common drive is -- is located here. We have Hightower Subdivision located just to the west of us and, then, this was Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 12 of 57 a portion of the Westborough Subdivision, which was an R-15 multi-family. To kind of give you a history of this property, because it's kind of lengthy, in 2003 it was approved as a non-farm development under Ada county as Westborough Subdivision. So, they had set aside land and, then, they had some one acre lots along Jericho Drive. In 2005 they came as a mixed use development for the set aside ground and they were proposing 40 multi-family dwelling units and six office lots and in 2007 it finally got annexed, zoned, so L-O and R-15. They installed the infrastructure in '07, then, in 2008 the recession hit. This particular project went into foreclosure. In 2008 ITD and ACHD decided that they wanted to eliminate Jericho Road -- or Jericho Street and its approach to Chinden Boulevard, which was intended to be a mid-mile collector, which when this project was planned it made sense that we would have an office component and, then, a multi-family component to the east, because you would have, obviously, visibility for 20-26 and access of a collector and so ITD and ACHD came in and said we are eliminating this approach. We are vacating Jericho Street. Then in 2015 the applicant came back in and submitted an application for 34 townhomes. These townhomes were two story, had quite a bit of bulk, had a density of 12.55 dwelling units per acre and the Council at that time said, you know, we don't think there is an overwhelming need to rezone this from L-O to R-15 based on your density, based on the bulk of the townhomes and they denied it. So, technically, this property has sat vacant for 17 years or -- since it was -- the improvements went in 17 years ago. This was the original plan that came in. They had the multi-family to the east and, then, the office buildings and, like I said, it made sense with Jericho as a collector, visibility from Chinden. And, then, once Jericho was vacated, then, these office lots have sat vacant for all this time. There was a neighborhood center that was designated on this property that has since been removed when Jericho was vacated. The property is technically mixed-use community and that allows densities between six and 15 dwelling units per acre. What I'm bringing forth before you tonight is 7.12 dwelling units per acre. All of my buildings are single story. I don't have any dwelling units that are more than two. And I did meet with the adjoining neighbors south of me, the Liebermans. I met with them twice. Because they have an estate lot that is located right here on our south boundary. So, they are like a one acre lot. Their garage, their tennis court is adjacent to me and so I -- I took them like a townhouse design and they said, no, no, no, I don't like that. We don't want anybody -- you know, the two story is out. So, then, I adjusted the site plan and those are two single family lots, single story. And, then, I transition into the duets. Those are only two units that are attached. They are one bedroom, one bathroom. Is the preliminary plat that's before you. So, I have two single family lots, one what they call a multi-family lot, but even though the definition under your code a multi-family is three dwelling units or more. So, I don't really even meet the multi-family and so when this was transmitted a lot of people were concerned, oh, they are doing apartments or multi- family -- you know, multi-family always brings up, you know, a negative response. But, really, these are duets and so my -- oops. My intent was let's create something for seniors. One bedroom. One bath. They are duets. And we already have a parking lot. We only have to construct 16 carports and we can deal with the parking issue that has been a headache on this property. So, to kind of give you an insight of what's happened out here is that multi-family portion -- they have inadequate parking. So, they were parking in our parking lots. They had junk cars. They had RVs. They had boats. The Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 13 of 57 city notified my client and said you need to sign it private property, no parking. This is becoming a real nuisance. So, then, when we did that, then, everybody started parking on Jericho and Everest, which, then, upset the other residents. So, my suggestion here is we are going to provide overflow parking for that existing development and so I will kind of get to that. As far as amenities, we have an open space with horseshoe pits. We have a pocket park with picnic shelter and trees. We have a fenced dog park with benches and waste station. We have 78 parking spaces in this existing. Our requirement is 36. So, we are so -- so over parked -- and some of the -- the letters that came in said, oh, you know, this can't be parked. Well, we are so over parked it's crazy. We are going to allow that existing multi-family development to use the southern parking lot, which is 16 spaces for their overflow. We will sign it, hey, park here, don't park on the street. This is kind of a landscape plan. I work with staff. We did ask for an alternative compliance. This development did the 35 foot buffer on Chinden. They did the fencing. The berming and ITD came in and they wiped it out and they put a ten foot wall up, a three foot retaining wall on our side, and, then, they put decorative gravel. So, under the code I'm supposed to landscape to Chinden and I'm -- like I can't, they have got gas lines, they have got power lines, they have got junction boxes. They cut my irrigation lines. I can't even get irrigation to it. Staff agreed and said, you know, come in with an alternative compliance. So, this particular landscape plan does have additional trees, additional landscaping that compensates for that. My other -- my other concern was I don't have any pedestrian pathway to Chinden, so how was a landscape company even going to maintain my 339 feet of frontage on Chinden. It -- it appears to be quite the hazard. So, this is the single story, single family dwelling. We have two of them. They will be on separate lots. They will adjoin the Liebermans. This is the direct we call it. So, it -- it has two units. These are 722 square feet. Our intent is they will be for seniors. One bedroom. One bath. There is a great need out in our community and there have been many articles about senior rental housing that is affordable. So, when I met with your staff I said, hey, I'm trying to come up with the least impact from a traffic perspective, the least density, but something that's affordable that meets a niche in the Meridian community and I think this is perfect and I said if you got a better idea I'm -- I'm all ears and the staff said, you know what, I think this -- I think you hit on something. This is good. There is the ten foot wall. This is over on the Hightower side and you can see the wall and that's their fence. This is -- this shows you what ITD did and in my conversations with your staff I said, well, if you wanted landscaping along Chinden why didn't you communicate that to ITD and they said they never asked. So, they put in this decorative gravel, this ten foot wall, so -- and the ten foot pathway. So, that's what we have to deal with. This is internally within my project. So, as you can see I'm low. That's the parking lot. We see the curb. Then they have a little three foot retaining wall and then -- and, then, we have the ten foot wall. So, what we are -- what we are trying to do, I guess, basically, is retrofit a project and in doing so it is my desire to make a product that can be rented affordably, because I'm retrofitting something where the improvements are already in. The parking lot's in. The islands. The trees. We just have to add the amenities and, then, work with Public Works for new services to these individual buildings. Like I indicated for 17 years this property has been underutilized, under taxed, and sitting there vacant and some of the neighbors that I met with, they put it in writing, there are kids that have partied out here. We saw drug deals. There are Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 14 of 57 people dumping couches. So, anytime we have a vacant property it becomes an attractive nuisance. So, once -- and what I told the neighbors, I said once I get residents in here that solves the problem, then, it's not vacant, under taxed. If you look at the lots that are to the west of me, these are 3,200 square feet. These are four units attached. Three units attached. They are R-15. I'm requesting R-15. I don't need the R-15, but it is required in order to have these duets on one lot. We have water. We have sewer. We are already in your service area as far as emergency services. One of the questions that came up at the Planning and Zoning Commission, which I want to mention, recommended a unanimous approval. We had 22,000 square feet of office. That's 398 vehicle trips per day. This -- what I show you now is 140 vehicle trips per day. So, that's a 64 percent reduction in traffic and I ask the Council to think about what is the least impact on this neighborhood and what is the best interest of the city and the community and this is what we came up with and I feel it's a good, good option. Thank you. Simison: Okay. Thank you, Becky. Council, any questions for the applicant? Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor. Becky, thank you. Could you show me where Jericho -- what's left of Jericho is and what their pathway to Chinden is, since Jericho is closed? McKay: As far as -- you mean vehicular access? Little Roberts: Uh-huh. Yeah. McKay: Okay. So, Jericho Street is right here and it was constructed all the way to Chinden. They vacated this portion of it where it intersected with Chinden. So, then, it -- my project connects to what they call Everest and Saguaro and, then, there is interconnectivity that comes down to Commander and goes out to Locust Grove. Little Roberts: All right. Thank you. McKay: Thank you. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Becky, just a couple of quick questions. All the duets are rental, as well as the two single family homes would be rentals? Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 15 of 57 McKay: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Whitlock, the two single family homes will be on individual lots, so they could be sold. Only the duets would be rentals. And, like I said, we are targeting seniors. One bedroom. One bath. Whitlock: Thank you. Follow up? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Becky, in terms of the -- if you might go back to the slide you were on before this. You said that 16 parking -- that's a good slide. Where would the 16 parking spaces be? The southeast corner? McKay: Yes, sir. So, there is this -- the cursor -- the two single family dwellings would be here. This parking lot has 16 spaces. We are going to sign it that it is overflow parking for these residents here to stop them from parking on Everest and Jericho. All of our parking for the duets will be in this parking lot and I only need 36 spaces. That's two spaces per dwelling unit for one bedroom, one bath. Whitlock: Okay. Thank you. McKay: And, then, we are going to sign the entrance roadway as no parking. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: And, Becky, this may be for staff as well, because we see this quite often where we see a density below what would normally be considered an R-8, but we see it classified as an R-15 or something higher and many times it has to do with the fact that just because of the restrictions placed on an R-8 you can't build the type of lot sizes or the type of product that you wish to build. So, could you go into that a little further and maybe from staff as well about why this needs to be this particular designation considering the density is under eight? Hood: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, if you don't mind I will go first and, then, the applicant can -- so, technically, I think the two southern single family lots could be rezoned probably to R-8 and be -- and be fine. Becky sort of said it, but does need the rezone to R-15, because our schedule of use control does not allow multi-family and these technically -- again even though they are duet style, they are still on one lot with 18 units on one lot. That is multi-family. Multiple dwellings on one property. So, it's not going to live that way necessarily, but technically there is one multi-family lot with 18 units. So, the R-15 is the first zone, if you will, in our R-2, R-4, R-8, R-15 that actually allows multi-family. So, technically for our definitions in our code this is a multi-family lot project with two single family lots. So, hopefully that clarifies. Overton: Perfect. Thank you. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 16 of 57 McKay: And I just want to mention that they are all single story. There are no two story within this development. So -- and two units apiece. There is no bulk. There is no height and that would be consistent with what's constructed in the Hightower. They are single story and four units attached and three units attached and, then, two. Simison: Council, additional questions for the applicant? Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we do. David Lieberman. Simison: Good evening. State your name and address for the record and you will be recognized for three minutes. Lieberman: Okay. David Lieberman and I have the house south of this subdivision. So, I'm not sure where a lot of this information has come from, but when I moved in there around 2005 it was -- we were told Jericho was closing. Jericho has been closed. There was never any thought that it wasn't going to be, so -- and they -- they keep on making it sound like they thought Jericho was going to go through and the City Council said never -- that was never intended to. The lights were supposed to go in at that Saguaro Hills. Everybody's been waiting, but, you know, everything gets done a little bit behind, but that's -- I mean that's the nature if you do it after you need it, not before, because bad things happen when you do that. It roads to nowhere. But the -- I didn't see any garages on this. Maybe I missed the picture. But if they are -- I mean they are just basically split apartments without the garages. I mean -- and the people to the left -- I mean you are not going to -- you are not going to purchase them without garages. The people to the left are the townhomes. They all have garages. They all -- we have got kind of a great community out there and we have had a lot of problems. The drug deals happen when they did not have that apartment going, they just -- they left built -- I don't know -- enough to keep the permit active I guess. I know somebody explained it to me before, said go and add a piece of concrete, leave for three or four months, come back, add something else, and there were drug deals, everything else going on, but the apartments were also empty and there were places to hide back there. That's cleared up. I'm the one who has been mowing their lawns. They don't -- their water is sporadic when they turn it on. The owners there. We tried to talk to them before. It's just -- this was the intent from day one is that's what they wanted. We heard it back in 2005 1 think and it's changed hands with the same people, you know. Some of my neighbors, they came in in 2015 with the receipts on that. I thought they were all going to be here, but this has kept moving out. I was surprised I was the one here and so I'm glad that they aren't trying to put a two story house hanging over the side, because we are all one story on the other side. Right now I'm not sure how it's going to all turn out, but -- I mean without the garages, car parts, I mean they are definitely a hundred percent rentals and I don't know if legally they can -- unless the department of building they go to seniors, it's just going to go however. I guess my time is up, but -- and there is no bus traffic there, so -- Simison: Council, any questions? Thank you. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 17 of 57 Johnson: Mr. Mayor, that was everyone who signed up. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody else who would like to provide testimony on this item? If you would like to come forward at this time to do so. And if you are online you can use your raise your hand feature. Oh, that was for people online. You have to just state your name and address for the record, please. Telford: My name is Craig Telford. I live at 1330 East Commander Street. I'm the HOA vice-president right now for the Reserve Subdivision. So, of course, I don't think anybody here would be excited if you said we are going to add traffic to your neighborhood; right? So, I mean we are not excited about that, but that's kind of the way it happens. The only -- and I'm glad that we have -- they have gone single story and we have the -- the parking has been a problem. She addressed that. I'm glad about that. I just feel like there is a little bit of a switch on, like what it's intended for seniors. Is it going to be 55 and over and that's how they are going to do it? Or are we going to have, you know -- we have got neighbors that -- they have -- they already have a place to live. We are not seeing people who get a place to live, but, you know, if we get rentals coming in, we get young kids and they have to have a roommate to be able to afford rent and so now we have got, you know, multiple young people living in this -- you know, it just -- it's a little hard to stomach. So, I appreciate the things they have done, but I'm still a little curious about the 55 and over -- like the seniors -- targeted seniors, is it really going to be limited to that. So, that's a question that I would have. So, other than that I appreciate what they have done, but certainly not excited about the added traffic, so -- anyway, that's it. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Quick follow up. Telford: Okay. Overton: As a Council, as a planning staff, there is nothing that we are doing or putting in place that would require them to only rent those properties to people that were 55 and older. Telford: Right. Overton: That would totally be on the applicant and the developer on their word that they were going to do that. Telford: Okay. Overton: But knowing that going forward, how did you want to see that developed? Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 18 of 57 Telford: I don't really have a problem with that, I just -- they were targeting 55 and over, but it's not going to go there. You know, the existing property that's there, they build garages for, but they built them so you can't put a car in it. So, that's why they have a parking problem. They already created buildings that you can't park your car in and so now what was supposed to be parking wasn't parking and now we got all the people out on the street, so -- Overton: I guess what I'm trying to get from you is are you okay with the size of this development, the fact that it's all single story, the number of units? Telford: Yeah. I don't think it's a horrible plan, but certainly better than two story units. It could be a lot -- could be a lot worse and I would appreciate the concessions that they have made. We are very concerned about parking, because you can only get in through Commander Street -- or through -- about traffic. You can only get in through Commander Street or you can only get in off of Chinden on Saguaro, so that puts -- we have already got quite a bit of traffic. I'm sure it's not at maximum density, but I don't think anybody here would love to have the maximum density traffic in front of their homes here. So, there is concern about traffic through there. There is just a very limited access in and out of there and I'm not sure that the parking problem is going to be resolved with that density the way it is, considering the fact that, even though they have parking, but they didn't make it big enough to park in, so those are our concerns. Overton: Thank you. Telford: Thank you. Rountree: Good evening. Mr. Mayor, Members of City Council, Tyler Rountree, 1098 East Pasacana not --just not too far south of this development. So, first and foremost, think staff's done a really good job trying to figure something out. I am not going to waste my three minutes to give you the history. If you want it be more than happy to share it to you at the end. I don't see it the same way, but there is definitely history there. Moving forward out of the P&Z meeting they came with a recommend of signage for no parking. The applicant was I will do whatever you want. I think the reality of it is is the applicant's told us what happens when you sign it. So, they had a lot to park in. It was a disaster. They signed that lot no parking and the people moved to the street. So, to the applicant's credit they are trying to provide more parking. If you put the signs that there is no parking on the street, they are now going to be parking in front of the neighbor's house that just testified, because that's where the overflow goes right now. So, my thought with that, in sitting in the P&Z meeting when I believe it was commissioners -- is it Commissioner Lorcher -- she had an epiphany of working and owning her own tow company. You signed it and you want to build affordable housing and we are going to charge people 300 to tow their cars. Does that make sense? Let those people fix their own problem. Parking is going to be a problem. Hands down. You will have two HOAs in there. Let those HOAs figure that out. Again, to the applicant's credit she was like I will do whatever you want to do, but to me it is completely counter-intuitive. She's proven to you it won't work. She has plenty of Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 19 of 57 spaces. Let them figure it out. Overall I think the density with this -- it works. Is it what we signed up for in '07? No. But here we are. So, again, I don't want to take anything from what the staff's done. Certainly the applicant has done things. But at the end of the day don't put signs up, because we are going to be back in here as neighbors asking you to put signs up on my public streets, so we don't have that overflow parking. Let them figure it out. And with that I will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor. Tyler, I will ask the question. What is the history that you think would be pertinent for us to know? Rountree: I think the history is a little -- it's going to be one sided, because it's coming from me first and foremost. I agree. I moved into my house in '07. It was very clear to me at that time that the collector of Jericho was going bye bye. It did go through the '08 recession. It was traded amongst the development community through bankruptcy. You know, it was a Jewett property to begin with. It's moved around. It's changed hands. To the applicant's credit, my hesitation with this is is bait and switch; right? We don't have a regular track record going on in 17 years of this property and she assured everybody on the dais it's not a bait and switch. So, I'm hoping, now that we will go forward with this, but ultimately we have been back and forth. To the people who live in the townhomes that are existing, to their credit when ITD came in and wanted to develop Chinden, they parked all of their equipment and all of their construction overflow on this lot. So, every morning you can ask them, 6:30, you know what they woke to? Beep. Beep. Beep. Beep. ITD built a ramp to come function and up over the wall and into that area for 18 months. The dust. Everything. So -- did they build a wall? If I had of owned that property I would have said why are you building a wall, I have to put office space in here. So, how that all went down I don't know. But here we are. So, again, I don't want to take anything away from what's done, but I don't necessarily agree with how we got to where we are today. Little Roberts: Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions? All right. Thank you. Rountree: Thank you. Simison: Is there anybody else that would like to provide testimony on this? All right. If the applicant will come and close. McKay: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Becky McKay. So, I did Jericho Subdivision. That was 2007. And Mr. Rountree testified against that Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 20 of 57 subdivision. At that time Jericho was supposed to be a collector and all of a sudden after that we found out, no, it's going to be discontinued. So, that, obviously, threw a monkey wrench in everybody's plans. This particular project -- it's L-O. You can't see it from Chinden. You can't get direct access from Chinden. You don't even know it's there and if it was marketable over these past 17 years I would think that somebody would have bought an office lot and built something, but it's just not happening and it's not going to happen, because it can't be seen, it can't be easily accessed for office. So, what we have to do, based on ITD and ACHD's decisions to discontinue Jericho and the City of Meridian's decision to move the neighborhood center further west, which we have a lot of commercial to the west. Churches, daycares, et cetera. We are left with the property underutilized, undertaxed and sitting there vacant with all the city services. Your Comprehensive Plan says we need to make a priority of in-fill parcels that have all of their utilities, access, and the cost to the public for service is far less if all of those things exist and that's what we have here. So, it's my job to look at this property and find something that is palatable to the neighbors and I met with Mr. Lieberman and his wife on two occasions. The two single family dwellings that will adjoin them do have garages. They are on separate lots. They are single story. And as far as the parking, everyone's like, well, you just can't solve this parking issue and I say why not? I need 36 spaces for my one bedroom, one bath, 722 square foot duets and I have 78 spaces. So, I got spaces running out my ears. We were going to sign those 16 spaces for the property to the east, which I agree they built garages, but according to what I have -- the input I have received is the garages are so tiny you can't even get a little car in them and people just put their stuff in them and, then, there is just not enough parking and I have counted their parking spaces, I have counted their garages, so to designate overflow parking areas specific to them is, obviously, going to help the parking issue on the local streets. I don't think that it's more convenient for somebody to park down Jericho or park down Everest when we have got a signage this is overflow parking for this development that is at this point in time unrelated to us. That's been sold. We can do an easement, we can do whatever. There is parking there. We will have overflow parking. We only need 36 spaces. I got parking running out my ears. I don't know what to do with it and we even talked about converting some of it to like nonparking area, but the best option was, obviously, to make it available, so that we can solve the parking problem. This property has been a nuisance. There is couches. There were junk RVs. There was all kinds of stuff. And as soon as the city enforcement officer told my client you sign it, this is private property, no parking, to get rid of all of these nuisances, that's what pushed that development to the east, the four unit -- three unit to start parking on the public street. I'm trying to solve that. I'm trying to fix a situation. I'm trying to reduce the trips and have the lowest impact that I can come up with and this is it. I -- I can't think of anything else. When you look at Hightower, as far as their density, I mean they have got density consistent adjacent to me and they are single story. They are four unit, three units. The R-15 that's east -- or east of me, they are higher density. I'm just trying to find a logical low-impact use and the niche right now is we have a lot of seniors that need housing on a one bedroom, one bath, affordable unit and if I can provide that, because I have existing parking, I have existing services, I just have to put in some amenities, then, I think I'm doing a good thing for the community of Meridian. And I ask that you support this. Thank you. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 21 of 57 Simison: Thank you. Council, additional comments, questions for the applicant? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Becky, when you are in front of Planning and Zoning there was no initial request for no parking signs on the street; is that correct? McKay: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, the Planning and Zoning Commission did want me just to sign the common drive or private drive that comes into our development as no parking, because I think it's 28 feet in width and they said can you sign that as no parking and, then, put signage up this is the overflow parking to get people -- that -- that was a suggestion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Overton: Mr. Mayor, follow up? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I don't think anybody's here from that neighbor -- neighboring development that you are talking about having an agreement with and, of course, that would be an agreement that we wouldn't partake in, that would be -- McKay: It would be a private agreement, yes. Overton: -- a private agreement just between the two of you. McKay: Yes. We would give them a parking easement. Overton: Have you already had those discussions with them or is this your plan -- McKay: This is my plan to -- to put up the signage and -- and basically notify them that -- stop parking on the public streets. Everest. Jericho. You can now park in this parking lot, which has previously been signed private property, no parking, based on Meridian Enforcement Division. Overton: One more follow up. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: And -- and roadway widths -- I can never remember exactly how wide they have to be to have no parking on both sides, but I know that if it's not up to the ACHD street width that they are used to, at least you can be looking at no parking on just one side of the street. Was there any discussion on just having no parking on one side? Because you have heard from the neighbors that if you sign that as no parking their concerns you are going to have parking in front of their residences. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 22 of 57 McKay: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, typically the rule of thumb is if -- if it's 29 feet they allow parking on one side and that private drive I believe is 28 feet and, then, after it gets past the -- the single family dwellings I think it transitions to 24. So, that was the concern of one of the Commission members that because of the private drive width they didn't want to see people parking, but -- but I don't see the advantage of them -- I mean they are going to be just as close parking in the overflow parking lot we are providing as they would be on the private drive. So, I think, you know, based on signage and communication to that development, their management company, that, hey, we are providing overflow parking. So, please, stop parking on the public streets. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Kind of push this back on staff a little bit. Staff, I know when this project came forward that there was no requirement in the staff report for no parking signs on this street and the fact that there wasn't -- was that because we believed in the application that this provided enough parking to adequately take care of the overflow from the development to the east? Hood: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, you are asking me to speculate a little bit on a premise that maybe -- I'm not sure what we were thinking. I will just -- back to your comment though -- and -- and I think Becky also alluded to it -- I mean 29 is typically the width where you can have parking on one side, but not both. We are looking at a fire lane being restricted to allow parking on both sides. I'm not sure why there is not a condition, because that width hasn't changed to access the existing multi-family in there. There should have been a condition in there that says at least you are restricting it on one side, if not both already, quite frankly, because that hasn't changed. That standard hasn't changed in 25 years that I am aware of anyways. So, I haven't verified there wasn't a condition. There may have been a condition. There may have even been signs up at one time. I don't actually know. So, I'm sorry, I -- I -- I can do some research and see if I can find a condition from over the last 17 years that did say restrict the parking at least on one side and I don't know -- we got the deputy chief here, maybe he can chime in. That won't help with the history of signing it for no parking or not, but maybe going forward should it be signed restricted on one side or the other, but I will see what I can find. Overton: Mr. Mayor, I would love to get all of city staff involved on this question, trust me, but the goal here is really to find out whether this -- this was necessary to have no parking on both sides where we have the potential for now pushing traffic around the corner in front of the residential and we are trying to make the least impact on your neighbors as possible. McKay: Yes, sir. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 23 of 57 Overton: So, if we were okay with parking -- no parking on one side of -- I think is that Everest? McKay: No, sir. It would be on the private drive. Overton: Private drive. McKay: The neighbors are concerned about the parking on Everest and Jericho, because the -- the school bus picks up the kids at that intersection and, then, there are cars parked along there. There are also concerns that -- I guess there were a couple incidents where some cars were sideswiped and so the issue is, then, parking on the public street, not necessarily parking on the private drive. So, I think what the Commission wanted to do is let's force them to park in the parking lots that you are providing for their overflow. Get them off the public street, but yet not encumber the private drive, because it's only 28 feet wide. And this was a Jim Jewett project that did go back to the bank. Then my client purchased it and it was kind of -- that R-15 portion was horribly under parked. Hood: Mr. Mayor. Simison: Mr. Hood. Hood: I will -- I will just add with the layout that Ms. McKay is proposing for the two single family homes, the driveways there will actually practically prohibit parking there anyways, because you got curb cuts or driveways -- McKay: Correct. Hood: -- those two homes -- you might be able to sneak one in between, but, really, you are effectively preventing -- not prohibiting, but preventing parking from happening on the south side anyways, again, just because you have driveways -- McKay: That's true, Caleb. Good point. Hood: -- going to those homes. McKay: Because you have the homes there. Right. So, that will restrict. Yeah. People can't park -- Hood: The driveway apron essentially takes up your curb frontage, so -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Becky, you talked a lot about age targeting. How do you do that? Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 24 of 57 McKay: With the one bedroom, one bath and the size of the unit it's obviously not conducive to families or young people. You know, those people -- like there might be, you know, four kids getting a two bedroom. So, my intent is my amenities are geared towards the seniors with the horseshoe pit, the little dog park, the little gazebo and so we are trying to make this appealing and in my conversations with Mr. Barton he said, you know, we -- we do see a need where -- where seniors want a smaller community, they don't want to be mixed in with college kids and, you know, families of three or four kids, so we are trying to -- we are trying -- that's our marketing -- Cavener: Yeah. McKay: -- and -- and, then, the affordability. Cavener: Uh-huh. So, Mr. Mayor, if I can -- Becky -- and I guess that's the part I'm concerned with is let's say you fill 90 percent of these units with people in their mid to late 50s, early 60s and a 30 something year old who comes to work at HP lives here and he runs a different schedule, because he works graveyards and so he is -- he is up later at night, he is disturbing these neighbors and all these neighbors think like whoa, whoa, whoa, we -- we moved into a -- to a place for kind of like our tribe and now -- now we have got this outsider and so I -- I worry that you are targeting a certain demographic, but you are not prohibiting anybody from living there, that you create a little bit of a challenge for the -- the residents that you are hoping to attract, as well as I -- I worry if it -- if it doesn't accurately communicate who could actually live there and so your client has done a lot of work in the residential space, why not deed restrict these to 55 and older, solve the concern of the neighbors, ensure that the demographic that you are hoping to live there are the only ones who can. You have got a unique product, so why not just close the loop and -- and really build something that's catered to the audience that you say that you want to target to live there? McKay: My understanding is legally there are issues with saying you got to be 55 or older to live there in the state of Idaho. However, you can market a development targeting this is a 55 and older community and our amenities are this, that and so forth. I mean young people typically want to -- they want to live where the action is, you know. They want to be over by The Village so they can go to dinner and hop over -- Cavener: Well, Mr. Mayor -- McKay: -- I mean this -- Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Becky, if you are -- if you are building something that's affordable -- you have got people who are looking for any housing that they can afford and so I hear you. given the option, all things considered, they would want to live near The Village. If they can't afford that and this is an option they would have and as I understand there -- there Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 25 of 57 are exemptions that would allow this to be a deed restricted -- again 80 percent of the residents have to be over 55, a hundred percent have to be 62. McKay: Yes, sir. Cavener: So, there -- there are options and I guess it's -- it's hard for me -- when I hear somebody say this is what we want to do and there is a mechanism to go do that and you are not choosing to. Like I -- that -- that -- that's curious to me and so that's the piece that I'm trying to figure out. McKay: Mr. Mayor, Mr. Cavener, we only have 18 units -- Cavener: Yeah. McKay: -- not 180. Cavener: Sure. McKay: So, I think this is manageable and, obviously, when Mr. Barton's rental management team takes applications -- I mean they do have a say in who qualifies and who doesn't. Cavener: Yeah. McKay: But that -- this is our target. This -- I mean it's perfect. This is perfect for it. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: And -- and, Becky, I -- I believe you and I -- and I actually think this is a unique product that will -- that will meet a need. I was part of the Council that denied this application, what, ten years ago -- McKay: Yes, sir. Cavener: -- and it was a good application. This is vastly superior with a unique product type. For me it's just -- it's always interesting -- anytime we get somebody that says this is who we want to attract and there is a mechanism to ensure that's the customer base you get and that's just not being pursued and so I just -- I was curious as to the why. So, I -- I appreciate your explanation. It's not going to impact my vote tonight, I just -- was trying to understand what the reluctancy was and to -- to ensuring that a 55 and older or a 65 and older community really is existing, which is what this -- you have said this product is designed for. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 26 of 57 McKay: Mr. Mayor, Mr. Cavener, that is our intent and I don't know if I can legally say there will not be a person that is 55 and older here, because I don't -- I don't control that portion and say they got to have somebody that's 54, they are divorced, it's a woman, she just wants a one bedroom, one bath. She doesn't want to have to take care of a yard, but she has a dog, so -- Cavener: I hear you. McKay: I mean we do the best we can with what we have to work with. But my understanding is legally we can't impose that, but that is our intent and they do have the ability to market it. Cavener: Thank you. McKay: So, I -- I -- I think, you know, with the one bedroom, one bath and the size of the unit it lends itself to a senior. Single story. Simison: Council, any additional questions, comments? Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Out of curiosity as well, that -- Caleb has the Google Maps called up and I'm just -- I'm curious about, again, the parking. It seems to me if you are putting two single family homes there on the west side it looks like all concrete on the east side. Is there a reason why you wouldn't put one or two more homes on that east side and sell that property and not have to deal with the other neighborhood's parking problems? Just curious. McKay: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Whitlock, that's a good question. These are the 16 spaces that we want these residents to utilize as the overflow parking. It's close to them. It's -- it will keep them from parking down Jericho, keep them from parking down Everest and it just makes sense that we provide that parking easement for these people and, like I said, we still have well over what we need. We only need 36 spaces up here and we have well over that. So, even if some of that overflow were to come into this parking lot I think -- I think the whole issue is to solve the parking problem. That has been a -- a thorn in all of these residents' side for many many years and if you look at Google Maps you can see that there are cars parked along Jericho, parked down Everest. So, if I can solve that, then, I am doing my job to rectify a wrong that's been done many years ago, but still create a neighborhood that's sustainable. Whitlock: Follow up? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 27 of 57 Whitlock: Just looking to the west it looks like the -- the three-plex and the four-plex all have garage parking. McKay: They do. Whitlock: To the east it looks like those have some garage parking that you can't fit a small car in. Is -- is your parking all surface lot or will there be carports? Or have you considered something like the Hightower to allow for garage parking? McKay: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Whitlock, we will install -- we have to install 16 covered spaces and, then, we will have 16 open spaces. There are sewer and water easements that run through this parking lot, so that is dictating where I can put my carports, because I can't have a carport over your sewer and water easements and that is prohibiting me from building garages and to make this affordable if I have to tear out all the utilities and start over again, then, that loses the affordability and that's what we are trying to achieve here. Whitlock: Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions, comments? All right. Thank you. McKay: Thank you. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: If there are no more public comments, I move we close the public hearing. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Overton: Mr. Mayor, I would like to kick off comments before we move forward. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I think you are taking a very tough chunk of land and trying to develop it. I think that's unanimous amongst everybody. I struggle -- I mean there are some really good examples in this city of senior homes that are totally designed for seniors. It seems like the biggest struggle I'm going to have is I have -- I have got two aging parents -- well, shoot, I'm over 55, but -- let's be real. I got aging parents and -- and Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 28 of 57 there is no way in the world they are going to park in a carport that far away from where they enter their duplex. So, I struggle with the implementation of seeing this marketing successfully to seniors. I think there is a lot of ways to do it. I think because you are really trying to fit a square peg into a round hole and make this lot work the way it's already laid out, that's going to be a really tall order. I think you can solve the parking issues with an agreement, but we don't have those folks here to even know whether they are going to accept an agreement or if they will be open to it. I'm not too excited about the requirement from the Commission to put no parking on the access road, as that could push more traffic out onto the public streets and I would be in favor to move forward with this project of striking that no parking request that came out of the P&Z hearings. I will be in favor of approving this with that action. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: If no one wants to talk with me, so with that said, after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony I can move that we approve File No. H-2025-0037 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 16th, 2025, with the following modification: That we go back and strike the request to have no parking on the access road leading through this development. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item H-2025-0037. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, absent; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Have a good evening. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 22. Public Hearing for Apex Cadence (H-2024-0061) by Brighton Corporation, generally located south of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and west of S. Locust Grove Rd., including 6575 S. Locust Grove Rd. A. Request: Modification to the existing Development Agreement (Inst. #2020-178120) to replace it with a new agreement for the subject property and to include specific design requirements. B. Request: Annexation of 0.86 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district. C. Request: De-Annexation of 0.52 acres of land from the City to Ada County. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 29 of 57 D. Request: Rezone of 56.11 acres of land from the R-8 to the R-15 zoning district. E. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 228 single-family residential building lots, 41 common lots and 16 other lots on 51.50 acres of land in the proposed R-15 zoning district with private streets in the gated portion of the development. F. Request: Planned Unit Development with a request for deviations to certain street, side, and rear yard building setbacks and to allow more than 100 dwelling units in a gated community. Simison: With that we will move on to Item 22, which is public hearing for Apex Cadence, H-2024-0061. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Hood: Sorry. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. There is the -- our PowerPoint back up. So, the applications before you for the Apex Cadence project are a development agreement modification -- or, again, I will -- I may say DA, that's development agreement. DA mod or DA modification. Annexation. And here is one you don't see very often, but they are asking actually a de-annexation is one of the applications they have submitted. I will get into that in a little bit more. A rezone. A preliminary plat. And, again, a planned unit development or I may slip into the shorthand -- PUD. Planned unit development. So, the site consists of 51.5 acres of land, currently zoned R-8, located at 6575 South Locust Grove Road. It's south of Lake Hazel on the west side of South Locust Grove. This probably was one of those that we annexed back in 2015 and assigned a placeholder zoning essentially. We don't have placeholder zoning per se, but we did zone it R-4, with the understanding it would likely be rezoned in the future consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The DA does, in fact, require a modification to the agreement prior to development of the MUC designated areas to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates consistency with the general guidelines for mixed use developments and specifically the MUC designation. So, again, you got another MUC designation here. The -- the DA or development agreement was amended in 2020 and the property was rezoned to R-8, but a development plan was not submitted at that time for this portion of the property and I should say I'm going to pause real quick and just say, again, I'm covering this project, so I'm -- I'm going to be looking at my notes more than anything. So, I'm familiar with this project, but I'm not as intimately familiar as the applicant and others, so if you need to grab my attention or whatever I'm largely going to just read my talking points. So, again, the Comprehensive Plan future land use map designation is medium density residential for 45 -- 40 -- about 40 acres and MUC for roughly ten or 11 acres. So, mixed-use community for about 11 and medium density residential for approximately 40. The applicant requests a modification -- a modification to the existing development agreement to include a conceptual development plan for the subject property. The new DA pertains only to the subject property and not the larger Apex development as a whole. So, the proposed concept plan depicts a mix of single family residential detached and attached homes on the portion of the site proposed to be included in the preliminary plat and future collector Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 30 of 57 streets and future land use map designations on the property to the north that is outside the boundary of the plat. The medium density -- medium density residential designation calls for a gross density of three to eight dwelling units per acre in our comp plan and the proposed density is 4.1 units per acre and the MUC designated area residential uses are expected to comprise between, again, 20 and 50 percent of the area designated for residential at gross densities ranging between six and 15 dwelling units per acre. Approximately 50 percent of the overall MUC area is proposed to develop with residential uses at a gross density of six units per acre. So, right at the bottom end of that target density in the comp plan. Although the residential density is consistent with the -- the -- with that desired in the comp plan for the MUC designation, the proposed development isn't consistent with the other MUC design elements that pertain to integration of uses and vehicular inner connectivity between developments due to the orientation of the proposed development in relation to the future nonresidential uses to the north and the gated development which restricts access and hinders integration of uses as desired in mixed-use designated areas. Breath. The City Council should determine if the proposed development plan should be modified to be more consistent with the general mixed-use and MUC development guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan as required by the current development agreement. Again a rezone of 56 acres of land from R-8 to R-15 is proposed for the area to be platted. So, the southern portion of the subject site. Let me see if I have a better exhibit. It's more phasing, but the southern area is roughly 51 acre -- 56 acres. Excuse me. And some R-15 zoning is proposed for the area proposed to be platted as well for the future development area to the north. Annexation of .86 acres is proposed to R-15 for a strip of land located on the west boundary of the project. I kind of went by it pretty fast. There is a water body and so some of this was not annexed and -- and it's a part and that's some of the de- annexation, even as is shown on the right here, these small slivers of land that are being -- I will just say cleaned up as part of this proposal. That -- that's -- the de- annexation strip is .52 acres. It's currently in Ada county, again, located on the -- kind of the west side and on the north sides of Via Roberto Street is requested that -- it was inadvertently included in the original annexation. This area was previously included in a record of survey to adjust the property line between two properties and the abutting property to the west, the Bruno property, but was never recorded. So, it's still part of the original parcels. Before a new property boundary adjustment or record of survey can be approved and recorded between the properties to rectify the issue the property needs to be in the county, so we can't adjust property lines between county and city land, it needs to be one or the other. So, that's -- long story relatively short, that's kind of what's happening there. Preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 228 single family residential building lots. Let me get to that again. So, here is the preliminary plat. Two hundred and twenty-eight single family lots, 41 common lots and 16 other lots, again, on a little over 51 acres in the proposed R-15 zoning district and the five -- to develop in five phases as you see in the middle exhibit on the screen. The overall gross density there is 4.43 dwelling units per acre. Based on 51.5 acres of development area a minimum of 15 percent or 7.73 acres of qualified open space is required to be provided. A total of 9.75 acres or 19 percent is proposed consisting of several open -- open grassy areas exceeding 5,000 square feet in area each, linear open space, 50 percent of the street buffer along South Locust Grove Road, a hundred percent of the street buffer along Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 31 of 57 East via Roberto Street, which is a collector street and a protective buffer dedicated for active access along the Rawson Canal. Parkways along local residential streets are also shown on the open space exhibit, which exceed the -- the UDC standards. So, again, the -- kind of teal color I guess it is would be your open space that I just verbally described. A minimum of ten site amenity points are required to be provided. Site amenities totaling 24 points are proposed, consisting of a clubhouse greater than 5,000 square feet in size, paved sports courts, multi-use pathways and pedestrian circulation system aligned with linear open space, which exceeds the UDC standards. As I previously mentioned, a PUD is proposed -- or planned unit development is proposed for a mostly majority of the lots are gated -- gated residential development. Again there is -- there are some mixed types of housing though. Single family residential attached and detached homes, front loaded and alley loaded with a variety of lot sizes, setbacks and home designs. Except for the 16 homes at the southwest corner of the development, which have public street. access, the other 212 homes are within a gated community. So, again, that's a relatively high portion of the lots proposed that are behind the -- the gate. And, then, behind the gate, obviously, are private streets with allies and common driveways. The gated portion of the development restricted to residents 55 years of age or older and the average residential lot size in the gated portion of the development is 4,665 square feet. The average residential lot size in the non-gated portion of the development is 7,233 square feet. See if I have a -- I guess don't have that -- that call out there for the different lot sizes, but -- the PUD includes a request for deviations from certain UDC standards as follows: UC113F4A4B restricted developments to more than a hundred dwelling units and, again, there is 212 units proposed and a reduction in the local street setback to living area is requested from ten feet to five feet for the alley loaded, also known as carriage lane units. Several conceptual building elevations were submitted for single story and two-story detached and attached single family homes. A variety of materials are proposed, including vertical and horizontal lap siding, board and batten siding, fenestration with stone brick veneer accents and a variety of colors and design elements and features with varying roof profiles and wall modulation that demonstrates the high quality of development proposed. The applicant is requesting the following approvals from the City Council. So, this is a waiver essentially. We don't allow private streets to connect to arterial roadways and, again, Locust Grove is an arterial roadway. So, that is requested for you tonight to allow East Bing -- Bingley Lane to intersect Locust Grove and UDC 11-3F-4132 prohibits private street connections. Oh, I just mentioned that. Sorry. So, that's the code citation. That section is 11-3F-4B2. And, then, approval to exceed the maximum block face standard in UDC11-6C-3F of a thousand feet with a pedestrian connection for Block 1, a portion of which lies along the Rawson Canal. So, maybe going back to the layout a little bit -- actually that one might work. There is no street connections because of the Rawson. They do have some micro pathway connections that sort of break that block up, but this block is technically longer than our code allows. So, that is also a waiver that the applicant is requesting this evening. During the November 20th Planning and Zoning Commission hearing the Commission did recommend to Council approval of this project. In favor was Amanda McNutt, Jon Wardle, Mike Wardle, all with Brighton Corporation. No one testified in opposition or signed up in opposition. Commenting was Julie Edwards. Written testimony was received by Joann Tima, Holly Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 32 of 57 Myers, Shawn Freeman, Amanda McNutt, again, with Brighton, largely with responses to the staff report. Aside from that that's the only additional testimony I have is the applicant commenting on some of the conditions of approval. I will get to that in a second. Key issues were the rezone request due to the increase in housing densities and associated impact. So, that was a topic. It seems like there was some similar to the last project we talked about, being some in favor of a 55 and over older community, as it wouldn't impact schools likely, but some that were against the proposed rezone to, again, the density increase that it would allow, which provides a little transition to the low density R-4 zone properties to the south. Also there was belief that the developer should be held to UDC standards without deviations, including the -- the request for over double the amount of homes is typically allowed within a gated community. So, again, that was some of the key conversations or discussions. There was some discussion about, again, the MUC and the purpose of a mixed-use development, particularly as it relates to this side of the arterial-arterial intersection, so Lake Hazel and Locust Grove, and that mixed use community designation spans across that intersection. There is some conversation about that. The reasons are lack of the integration of uses due to the residential developments being gated off. Again, the -- kind of at the core, the gated community is that you sort of wall yourself off from some of those other uses that would otherwise have better connectivity and integration. Generally, though, in favor, again, of a proposed 55 and older development, but there was some concern about the common driveways proposed and actually this exhibit still shows one of those common driveways coming off of the private street network. So, Commission changes to staff's recommendation. The Commission directed the applicant to continue to work with the city on the timing of the phasing of the amenities. I would include -- I think that also includes amenities being some of the landscaping and the timing of -- and installation of that as well. That there is good faith to be able to work with the county and the city to get all the permitting correct. And, again, that largely goes back to the -- the zoning and those strips of land and the de- annexation and the zoning and the property boundary adjustments associated there and to provide an updated plat for City Council in regard to the stub street for the Murgoitio property to be incorporated at a later date, if at all. No specific changes are made. So, those are some of the quote, unquote, outstanding issues. Potentially, too, are some of the things I just highlighted. So, I won't belabor that anymore. But if there are any questions or you want to talk about any of those things I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. McNutt: Amanda McNutt. 2929 West Navigator Drive. I'm here with Brighton tonight and this is Apex Cadence. Thank you, Caleb, for presenting tonight. I know you kind of got thrown into this so appreciate that. So, this is the next step in our pinnacle development. At the intersection of Lake Hazel and Locust Grove there is 212 residential lots in an age qualified gated community with private streets. It will include a mix of single family detached alley loaded or carriage lane and attached or paired homes. There is also 16 conventional single family detached -- kind of in that cul-de- sac on the east side. We are proposing to rezone from R-8 to R-15. This is primarily Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 33 of 57 because it provides us better flexibility in those setbacks. With a PUD we could do this, but it's just a lot simpler to do it this way and so that's kind of why we are doing it. Here is an example of what the designation is here. Although we do have some mixed-use community, the majority of this is actually medium density residential with just a tiny sliver of medium high density and we are not requesting a future land use map modification. In this I kind of wanted to show what's proposed now, what's existing and just kind of quote a few things out of the future land use compliance. So, it's -- residential density is supposed to be between 20 and 50 percent of the development area and about 50-50 right now between residential and non-residential uses out here. Medium density residential allows three to eight units per acre and we are at 4.6 for this development, which, again, is kind of the brunt of that area. This was talked about in depth at the Commission hearing and so I wanted to touch on it a little bit here as well. Successful projects would reduce -- reduce vehicle trips for nearby residents. I feel like in this area Cadence will be mostly the nearby residents. There is not going to be a whole lot else that actually develops around here due to the Rawson Canal. It just limits what could happen there. So, I have kind of put arrows of how traffic could potentially flow through here. Most everyone is going to use Via Roberto or future collectors to the north and east. They are shown in pink. Those red lines just kind of indicate how traffic may flow through there. So, while there may be slight restrictions to vehicle access, there is plenty of pedestrian access in here and those are not restricted for people to use and, again, I -- I just feel like there is not a whole lot more that's going to happen out there that would use those pathways. These particular pathways is what I mean. And, then, I just wanted to show how we comply with this area in particular and what the comp plan kind of calls out specifically for connections in here. If you will notice on the diagram to the left this is from the Comprehensive Plan and it actually calls out pathways specifically as the primary and secondary connections through the mixed-use community designation. So, even in the comp plan it's not saying that vehicular access is the primary connection, it is pathways that are the primary connection. We have our commercial medium to -- medium high density residential and our single family residential almost exactly lining up with what that graphic shows and, then, I have just kind of highlighted with arrows there what our primary pathway connection would be and what our secondary pathway connection would be through there. We do have a ten foot wide pathway that's going to go along the Rawson that would connect to future roadways as well, but we did add a north-south connection directly to that future roadway. I will agree with Caleb on this. It's kind of some weird clean up stuff that we need to do on this property. There is a small portion of the Rawson Canal that is part of this property that was not annexed with the mass annexation that we need -- we need to now include as part of this project and there was a small piece of property that was included that shouldn't have been that we need to de-annex and, essentially, this is going to be mostly handled by the county and -- and not us. If we were to receive an approval tonight the next action would be for the county to rezone the parcel and, then, the owner, who that actually needs to go to, would, then, be responsible for doing a property boundary adjustment. There is a condition that states we need to have this all done before we submit our first final plat. We felt like that timing was maybe not the best, because we don't have control over the majority of this process. Really the only control we have over the process is what we are doing tonight. Everything beyond that Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 34 of 57 we can't control that timing. We do understand it needs to be completed, though, and so we were willing to do that with our last final plat to make sure that that's done prior to this project being completed. Again this just kind of shows what we are asking for as far as the PUD setback changes. If we had kept R-8 there would just be a lot more to this, but, essentially, the only request that we are making from the R-15 setbacks is that the local street would be five foot, instead of a ten foot setback on our carriage lane specifically. We are proposing to complete this in five phases. We have included a small portion of the northern half to be rezoned with this as well. The very north or the orange there will be future -- all of that orange and yellow actually will be future. The rezone is just easier to do right now, but we will come back in with everything to the north in a future pre-plat. This was talked about as far as what's allowed by code for private streets connecting to an arterial roadway. The connection shown with the 190 feet called out is a private street with a gate. We did want to increase that depth there so there was plenty of stacking for people if Locust Grove gathers a lot of traffic through here. I -- I don't know that this necessarily will be the main point of entry that people use or if they prefer to use Via Roberto, but, essentially, we would allow ten to 11 cars to stack in there before the gate. So, I think with that and just where it lines up with the roadway to the west, that that's a good place for a private street. Additionally we are asking for more units in a gated community than what's allowed by code. A hundred are typically allowed by code in a gated community and we are asking for 212. There is several of these in the city and this isn't actually the odd one out as far as asking for more units in a gated community. We are offering one more gate entry point than we have in our other developments and we haven't had any issues with that being gated or access getting backed up at all, but we did feel like with the number of units it made sense to have three gates here -- or three access points. And, then, Caleb also mentioned this, that we do have one block face that exceeds the allowed 1 ,200 feet unless a waiver is provided. This is essentially because the Rawson Canal exists there and it just -- the way it develops out there is a long roadway. Traffic through here likely won't be fast anyway, but we are providing a bulb out at that circled location just to help slow traffic. As mentioned there are several pedestrian crossings and accesses as well, just no true intersections because of the long stretch there and so we are asking for that waiver to be approved for a street greater than 1 ,200 feet. We are required to include ten amenity points and we are providing 24. We have a large clubhouse, sports courts, a lot of multi-use pathway and sidewalks and, then, pathway in a linear open space, which is that along the Rawson Canal. I did want to show kind of how our pathway network works. We have built most of the sidewalks in teal out here already. Other than what you see with Cadence itself. There is going to be substantial connectivity throughout this entire area. We will also be providing the -- the ten foot pathway along the Rawson Canal with eight foot connections internal to Cadence. Again all of these will be open to anyone, including the internal sidewalks. I wanted to point out the circled orange area. I apologize it's a little small, but it's there on the left-hand side. That's kind of the first connection point that would be used in this development for people to access any other point. For instance, if they wanted to walk up to the library or if they wanted to walk to the park, that's the access point that they would use to get to other places. Basically a request was made in the conditions to provide all of the ten foot sidewalks and the ten foot pathway with our first phase and they are kind of pathways to nowhere Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 35 of 57 at this point, just because the development to the north where we are waiting on that is not going to provide a connection. They are going to have to cross the street to use that connection anyway. So, we would prefer that we build that as phases are developed, rather than all at once. Here are some examples of another Cadence property that we have already developed and these amenities are going to be extremely similar to this and here are some of our elevations, which are slightly more updated than what was shown in the other. Our conventional homes are there on the left in blue. These are just typical front-loaded homes. In pink along the outer edge are our paired Cadence product. To me it's actually kind of hard to tell that these are paired, but they are. We did do unique colors and elevations to just kind of break up and make them not look like one plane of a home, but two unique homes. These are the age restricted paired units and this internal or the orange carriage lane are also within the age restricted area. These are all detached single family and, again, carriage lane or alley loaded product, so there is no garage on the fronts. So, some conditions that I kind of mentioned throughout this project -- or as I have gone through this presentation that I would like to come back to that we were asked to subdivide prior to submittal of any building permits for the development and we would ask that that's except for building permits associated with the community amenities, including, but not limited to, the pool, pool house and gazebos. Essentially that allows us to get started on amenities from the get go, so that as residents move into that very first phase our amenities are complete and they can come in to a development that has amenities ready for them. The second would be that prior to the signature on the fifth final plat the property boundary adjustment between that de-annexed parcel and Ada county would be finalized. Again, this is just kind of outside of our control and so we are asking for that to be modified. The last two are about the sideway -- sidewalk and pathway and, again, it's just not really connecting to anything. They are going to have to cross the road anyway to get anywhere besides internal and so we would ask that those are approved to be constructed with the phase that they are adjacent to rather than at the beginning and I will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Amana, one quick question. When we were looking at the overall development and you showed that the initial point was going to be out onto Locust Grove, I noticed you have three access points, which you mentioned. Do all of them have the 190 foot or just that one on -- onto Locust Grove? McNutt: Great question. Thank you. That one has a much larger stacking distance. Well, maybe not much larger. But it does have a larger stacking distance. Probably -- I'm guessing here, but I'm guessing maybe 50 more feet than the other two access points and that's because Via Roberto is a collector and so it's not as heavily trafficked as Locust Grove is and, again, with our other projects we provided that at least minimum 50 feet, because that's what's required by code, but I think we do a little bit Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 36 of 57 more than that and we haven't had any issues with stacking on -- on any of those projects. Overton: Mr. Mayor, quick follow up. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: But that's the 190; correct? McNutt: The one on Locust Grove is 190, yes. Overton: The other two are about 50 feet shorter roughly, give or take? McNutt: Yeah. I can measure it, but I'm not sure exactly. Overton: Okay. Thank you. McNutt: You are welcome. Simison: Council, any additional questions for the applicant? McNutt: Sorry, I'm just going to add one thing. We -- we had provided public testimony that we asked for one other condition to be modified, so if you read our public testimony there is one additional condition in there that we had asked to be removed, but we are no longer asking for that. Essentially, the Murgoitio property was asked to be pulled into our pre-plat for -- the future pre-plat on the north to create a legal parcel of record for those individuals that live there and we are now agreeing to that after speaking with those owners. Hood: So, Mr. Mayor, if it's okay I can put a little more -- more context into that. There is an out parcel -- if you look at the both the rezone and the preliminary plat exhibit -- yeah. Amanda is still driving, so thank you. There is a condition and we had ask that if it's been split in the county and that's -- it's valid, then, that's fine, but we didn't get any proof that it had been split legitimately through Ada county. So, that was our concern is that you can't have a -- we don't want to see a county enclave or an illegal split happen, so we put that condition that -- that's great, subdivide it, but, anyway, just a little bit of context. The -- the existing home is on a parcel. We haven't been able to get approved up that it was legitimately split off from the rest of this property. McNutt: Thank you. Simison: Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up to provide testimony on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, there are none. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 37 of 57 Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present who would like to come forward and testify on this item and if you are online you can use -- use the raise your hand feature. Okay. McKay: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Becky McKay. Engineering Solutions. Business address 1029 North Rosario. I'm -- I'm representing Mike and Linda Murgoitio who have the adjoining 205 acres. So, there -- there is undeveloped property that wraps around this parcel. I would just like to let the Council know that the Murgoitios have retained a surveyor who has completed a survey, topographic boundary, geotech study on the property and they have retained me to do the land planning for their properties. So, it is their intent to move forward with some type of development plan and come before the Council. So, obviously, reviewing the application that's before you, we do have a few comments. Obviously, the -- the rezone from the R-8 to the R-15, obviously increasing the density, we want to make sure that Public Works has taken into consideration the sewer capacity. We would hate to, obviously, submit application and find out that all the sewer capacity has been used up with the increase in density and the rezone to the R-15. We are in that same sewer shed as Brighton and, then, there is a portion of the property that goes to the northwest toward the Costco, but we just don't want to, obviously, be the last man standing and not have any ability to sewer into the city, since their property is already annexed and it is -- I think it has a holding zone of R-4. Secondly, Linda Murgoitio's property, it's about two and a half acres, it fronts on Locust Grove. The home there is -- based on the assessor is well over one million dollars and I'm concerned that -- that if it was illegally divided it has always been staff's and the Council's intent that any illegal division that's taken place off of parent parcel be rectified by including that outparcel as part of a plat. You required it of me for Fall Creek. You required it of me for Spring Day. And I think I had a third parcel that I was required that even though it was under separate ownership, the fact that it came off that parent parcel we could not allow that property to be left unplatted and legalized. And, lastly, I'm concerned about this conceptual plan that shows a collector road going right through the million dollar house out to Locust Grove. We have no knowledge of this. It says conceptual only, so I'm questioning that and, lastly, with all the private roads it has always been the staff and this Council to make sure that we integrate our projects, that we have interconnectivity and, obviously, with the private roads that's going to force my traffic to go out to Locust Grove, because I can't go into a gated private road community. So, that changes kind of the whole mixed- use community that under your comp plan talks about integration and making everything mesh and I can't do that when I got to have private roads. I am cut off. So, I just want to make the Council aware of that. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Thank you. McKay: Thank you. Simison: Is there anybody else that would like to provide testimony on this item? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward to close? Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 38 of 57 McNutt: Thank you. Amanda McNutt. As far as sewer capacity and Public Works comments, you know, they have looked at this and we didn't receive any comments that said that there was a capacity issue. As far as the rezone is concerned we are actually not increasing the density at all. We are -- we are just rezoning, but the future land use map and what was intended to be the densities will be maintained. We are not changing any densities from the future land use map designations. As I mentioned we will be including the Murgoitio parcel in a future plat, but that is for the north portion of this area, which it's going to come back later. So, that's -- that's not actually what we are here to talk about tonight. And as far as the concept plan, I -- I agree it was really quickly put together, because it was asked of us to put something together that showed access to that parcel and we just kind of slapped something together. So, we would work with the Murgoitios and Becky to make sure that that plan worked for them and worked for the area for us as well. So, again, that -- that's going to be vetted with the Murgoitios and us at that time. And if there is any questions I will answer those now. Simison: Council, additional questions for the applicant? McNutt: Appreciate it. Thank you. Simison: I -- I have one. McNutt: Oh. Sorry, Robert. Simison: The integration, private street, how do you see that working? I mean just conceptually what is the -- does it make that property to the north only take access onto Lake Hazel? Is there even an access point on Locust Grove? Is -- is it limiting to that factor in -- in this case as Ms. McKay talked about? With -- if the private sheets remain as is. McNutt: Yeah. That's a great question. With the north portion of the property not being fully developed or really even the concept plan being fully vetted there is a lot of things that we can do to make sure that there is access to Locust Grove, as well as Lake Hazel. The private streets were only going to be internal to Apex Cadence and so for us to provide something to the -- to the east I think is doable -- or, sorry, to the west. But, again, it's just something that we would need engineers to look at and make sure we can do. But I don't really have a concern that that's doable. I think it can be done. Simison: Maybe I will turn to staff, because there is an access to that house off of Locust Grove currently; correct? Is it within the place where ACHD would somehow want to close that? Because I don't know what the proximity to roundabouts are. Do -- do you have the same -- same limitations on roundabouts and it is even relevant in this case or not? Hood: Yeah, thank you, Mr. Mayor. I appreciate the question. Simison: It looks like it's not. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 39 of 57 Hood: I mean it -- it is I think. Obviously, there -- there is the roundabout and there is existing access to answer your first question there. There is an offset required and, in fact, I will draw your attention -- not to rehash, but a couple of months ago you had a project just a mile to the north where you had this exact -- it was on the other side of the road you had the same conversation. So, I think that is a -- without opening this whole thing back up, that is one of the questions or concerns of staff is Tower Street is in alignment. There is a nice home there. If not Tower Street now we are getting closer and closer to this roundabout. Something's got to give and the private streets that the applicant's proposing, the mixed-use community and that interconnectivity, while appreciate the -- the pathways and pathways are great and having the two connections to the north are great, if you don't have any vehicular connection between this project and the northern to be developed, you start to run out of options if you are going to have an access to Locust Grove. I mean there may be opportunity to fit something in there north of the existing access or roughly where that existing northern access is, but you are getting very close to this roundabout and, again, there is similar conversations and concerns from a project just a mile away. Yes, there are grade changes with that one, too, right, coming down the hill as you enter that intersection, but I think that's something that hasn't been evaluated and some of the concern with -- I appreciate the sentiment of working together, but I'm also a little concerned when it comes to agencies and their standards to where we can have access points. Not having another one generally where Tower Street is. Simison: And we do have ACHD on the line. I don't know if they feel educated enough to weigh in on this based on the -- yeah, I don't know if they have a distance standard and where they -- where that gets measured from. Matt, any input? Pak: Good evening. This is Matt Pak representing ACHD. We don't have policy that explicitly states the offset from a roundabout, but we typically refer to signalized intersection offset spacing. Looking at about 330 feet for a right-in, right-out and, let's see, 710 feet for a full movement. This access was not evaluated as part of the staff report for this application and it would be reviewed as a -- as part of a future development application for that specific parcel. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Hood: Mr. Mayor, if I can, just to put that in -- Nick actually looked it up. It's roughly 400 feet or so from the roundabout to that northernmost access point, just put that dimension there. Yeah, about 400 feet. Simison: Okay. But Tower has no issues? Hood: Yeah. I mean it looks like it would be about 500 feet to Tower. Yeah. Simison: Okay. All right. Thank you. So, we do have someone else who has asked to raise their -- has raised their hand. Council, would you like to take additional public Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 40 of 57 testimony? Okay. Julie, you will be recognized and, the applicant, you will have another opportunity to come back up. Edwards: Hi. My name is Julie Edwards. I'm at 1310 East Mary Lane. Just in talking about this Murgoitio house, I did have a question. If that house is going to stay or will it be demolished eventually, because just the flow of the mixed-use you would have commercial properties to the north, which would be just south of Lake Hazel and, then, you would have this million dollar home and, then, just to the south of that you would have this jam packed gated community. So, I was just curious what was actually going to happen with this -- with that house if it would disappear once Murgoitio develops whatever other section he is doing down there. That's all. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? I don't know if there is anything there for the applicant that -- if you would like to make any -- any last final comments related to that. Applicant does not at this time. Okay. Council, do we want to take a few minutes break to gather any thoughts? Do we want to -- or do you think you want to deliberate this at this -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I'm seeing nods for -- for a break. Simison: Okay. Well, we will go ahead and take a 15 minute recess and, then, reconvene at roughly 8:35. Roughly. (Recess: 8:19 p.m. to 8:35 p.m.) Simison: All right. We will go ahead and come back from recess. Is there anything that the applicant would like to share more after our break? NcNutt: Oh, on this -- oh. Never mind. We are good. Okay. One other thing that was asked about was on Condition A24-1, I -- I had been asked to do an alternative compliance for the number of lots off of a common drive. This is specifically for the northwest corner. There are four units accessed off of a single common drive on one side. So, code allows you to access four units off of a common drive, but they can't all be off of one side. Again really just due to the way the Rawson Canal is in that area it just kind of curves. It was best for us to do an extension of the common lot there and have four on one side. We could handle that with an alternative compliance if we wanted to, but it -- it was asked if we could talk about it here before we did that. Hood: And, Mr. Mayor, if I can -- Simison- Mr. Hood. Hood: So, that's -- that's me that thought it would be good to daylight that request as we are at the public hearing, you can see the whole picture of the whole project and give staff that direction to issue an approval or if you need more information there is findings that go along with alternative compliance. I will -- I will be honest I haven't Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 41 of 57 looked at the applicant's narrative yet, their justification for that. I heard it just now, but haven't actually looked at what they are proposing in lieu of, you know, to offset that -- that -- or mitigate for the -- having more than three on one side of a common drive. But that was my request again it seems out of sequence to have staff approve something after Council's already acted on it, so I thought, well, let's bring it before the Council. So, I apologize I didn't ask that earlier. I appreciate Amanda giving you an overview of their request. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Amanda, I appreciate that. One other item I want to make sure that we touch on and are clear on and that is 2-R Based on some of the testimony we have had here tonight I'm not comfortable with waiting on getting those ten foot wide detached sidewalks on Locust Grove. Would you be comfortable with the original language of completing that entire area of sidewalk with the first phase of development tonight? McNutt: I think if either of those were going to be remaining the same it -- it would be the Locust Grove would be the appropriate one to keep over the Rawson, because if -- if people are going to use a sidewalk it's going to be the Locust Grove sidewalk. So, I think we can agree to that one, although we would prefer to defer if-- if that were so. Overton: Got it. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: If there is no more public testimony, I move we close the public hearing. Cavener: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any further discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Overton: Mr. Mayor, I'm willing to take a -- Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: -- take a shot at the first attempt at this application. After considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony I would move that we approve File No. H-2024-0061 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 16th, 2025, with the following modification: On Item A-1-E we accept the change in language from the applicant to state the property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any building Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 42 of 57 permit applications for the development, except for permits associated with community amenities, including, but not limited to, the pool, pool houses and gazebos. On Item A- 2-6 that, Council, we grant the request for alternative compliance application that has been submitted. On item 2-0 we approve the language change submitted by the applicant to read that prior to the signature of the phase five final plat the property boundary adjustment between parcel S1406131700 and S1406427800, S1406417700 and, finally, S1406110355 shall be finalized. The applicant shall submit proof of such in the form of an approval letter from Ada county and a recorded survey -- a record of survey. On the Item 2-P we stick with the language presented by our staff, which was the ten foot wide detached sidewalks along South Locust Grove Road and East Via Roberto Street be constructed in their entirety with the first phase of development. And on the last item, 2-Q, we go with the language change by the applicants that the ten foot wide multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal shall be constructed at the time that the adjacent phase is constructed. Cavener: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second. Would the second like to repeat the entirety of that motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor, not this evening if that's okay. But I do -- do have a question either for -- for staff or for the motion maker. Simison: Councilman Cavener is recognized. Cavener: It has to -- relates to A-1-C. Because the applicant accepted the -- or withdrew their requested change we didn't need to capture that in the motion; correct? Hood: Correct. I appreciate the question. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener. Yeah, it just reverts to what you have before you today in the staff report. Thank you. Cavener: Yep. Thanks. Overton: Motion maker agrees. Thank you. Simison: Okay. Cavener: Of course he does. A great motion. Simison: Is -- is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, absent; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 43 of 57 MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 23. Public Hearing for Apex Zenith (H-2025-0041) by Brighton Corporation, generally located at the southeast corner of Meridian Rd. and Lake Hazel Rd., in a portion of Lot 4 Section 6, 12N., R.1 E. A. Request: Preliminary Plat to subdivide two (2) existing parcels into seven (7) buildable lots across 11.549 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. B. Request: Private Street application that is naming the drive aisles. Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to Item 23, which is -- which is public hearing for Apex Zenith, H-2025-0041. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Napoli: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The next item on the agenda is the preliminary plat for Apex Zenith Subdivision. So, the applicant requests a preliminary plat to subdivide two existing parcels into seven buildable lots across 11.065 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. The plan excludes the parcels containing the Costco site and the larger development, including commercial and residential to the south as a part of phase two. As shown on the screen the existing zoning is C-G and the FLUM designation is mixed-use regional and -- mixed-use regional. The subject parcels were annexed in 2015 with the South Meridian annexation. These properties were given the placeholder zoning of R-4 until future development and in 2024 the property was rezoned to C-G -- to the C-G zoning district as a part of the larger mixed- use project called Apex Zenith. After the annexation the applicant submitted a property boundary adjustment to reconfigure the properties to allow for legal parcel -- to allow for legal parcels for development. This is the reason why the Costco is not included within this subdivision. As a part of the larger project the north-south collector, also known as South Optimum Avenue, the east-west collector is known as East Spire and -- East Spire Street and Aristocrat Drive are required to be constructed part of the first occupancy in the development. In addition with this application -- with this application the applicant is proposing two private streets known as East Tower Lane and South Momentum Lane and are also required to be constructed prior to the first occupancy. To add, the applicant has entered into a STARS agreement with ITD for improvements to Meridian Road and this does include the deceleration lanes that you see roughly on the site plan for those access points off of Meridian Road. Regarding access that the applicant has -- had previously the access points to Lake Hazel and Meridian Road -- were previously approved with a Council waiver back in a 2024 application. So, these private streets, since those -- the Council waiver was already granted there is not another one needed tonight for those private street connections to the arterial roadways. The applicant will be providing five foot sidewalk on both sides of the proposed private streets that connect to the ten foot multi-use pathway along Meridian Road, Lake Hazel Road and Optimum Avenue. The Commission is recommending approval as presented in the staff report and we have received one written testimony Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 44 of 57 from the applicant in regard to the request for Condition 5 to be removed from the staff report and this will be Condition 5. And I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you, Nick. Council, any questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward? McNutt: Amanda McNutt. 2929 West Navigator Drive. So, this is just a preliminary plat for Apex Zenith. You saw most of this come through in 2024. This is just the first preliminary plat for this area. As mentioned it does not include Costco. That was a different thing. This is about 11 acres of property at the southwest corner of Meridian and Lake Hazel. Just a recap of kind of where we are with Zenith. We have got the rezone done. The development agreement -- agreement is executed. The property boundary adjustment was completed and the roadway and utility construction plans are done. So, roadway construction is now underway. The STARS agreement with ITD is fully executed as well and, then, we will be putting design guidelines in for that area, which is similar to what we did out at Ten Mile if you recall that, just kind of have some control over the design elements in that area. Again, a recap of the area in whole. Lots going on out here. I'm not going to recap that too much, because I feel like you guys are familiar. Here are the seven lots and the private streets. You can see Tower there and Momentum. These will all be commercial lots, so any internal driveways or anything like that are just going to be commercial drive aisles. It's in the mixed-use regional designation and we are not requesting any modifications and this was already rezoned with the previous application, so no further changes are asked. I did want to recap kind of what the private streets are, what the public streets are and how the pathway system is going to work out there. So, here in green, which is the top portion, those are private streets with five foot detached sidewalks. We will have tree lined sidewalks out there. They are estimated to be complete July of next year. The public street in blue, which is also on the north side there, has a ten foot detached pathways and it's also intended to be completed in July. The southern section is all public streets with a variety of sidewalks and pathways, estimated to be completed in August, and the signal location per ITD is supposed to be completed in October. That's the only thing we don't have control over, though, so take that one with a grain of salt. There was one condition that we didn't realize was an issue until we got to Council. So, the only reason we actually realized this was a problem is because that retail user contacted us and asked why they were being held up and we realized that this was an issue. So, there is a condition that says that Lot 4 must use this shared access between the Costco fuel station and, again, Lot 4 there off of Tower Lane. So, that's the blue area that I have circled on this graphic. We felt like this maybe isn't the best idea and the reason why is because that is going to be the fuel center. So, people are going to come in one way traffic up to the fuel center just like the other ones are designed and, then, they are going to come back out that same entry point. So, if we ask for everyone on Lot 4 to take access from that same access point it's pretty likely that it's going to start backing up onto Tower, because people are going to have to come in immediately try to turn left into Lot 4 and crossing both in and out traffic from the fuel center there. In traffic probably not as much, because they have quite a distance, but the out traffic is going to probably stack up -- maybe not a ton, but two or three cars are going to have to stack Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 45 of 57 up to get back out onto Tower. So, we felt like having an individual access point onto Tower 4 for Lot 4 made a lot more sense and so we are asking for that condition to be removed. With that, though, otherwise we did concur with staff recommendations and we will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Amanda, can you go back to that previous slide? So, help me out. So, is the blue circle designate where you want the access point? It's where you do not want the access point? So, the arrows flowing from there you want them to come into the -- from the access point just to the west of that? McNutt: Yeah. Mayor, Council, the circle area is where they would like the access point to be for Lot 4 and we would like that not to be the access point and I think they probably actually want that like on the line between those two lots, probably shifted a little bit, but we would like Lot 4 to have their own access point, which would be that left- hand side or the kind of solid red arrows that show how traffic could flow through their parking lot, specifically for Lot 4. Overton: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Amanda, I'm sorry, I'm -- I'm -- I'm not tracking on this and I'm -- I'm thinking about similar locations that, you know, that have got one entrance in and, then, one to two entrances out and what you are showing me here is entrance and exit is all in the same place and that is a -- it's a high traffic area. I'm just trying to understand what the advantage is in terms of traffic safety and traffic movement by keeping it all contained in one spot. McNutt: Yeah. Councilman Cavener, I agree it's not. So, what -- what we were asked in the condition was to combine all of the access into one point for the fuel center and Lot 4 and what we are asking is to -- to have it as shown where there is two different access points, because we really felt like if we have just one access point that's shared between the two users and we don't know what the Lot 4 user is going to be, but whoever that ends up being we don't want them to have to share traffic with the fuel center in and out of Tower, because that -- that -- we thought would probably cause congestion onto Tower. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, if I can follow up. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 46 of 57 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: But I also think, Amanda, it's important for the -- the fuel customers to have more than one exit out of there. Simison: Maybe are you -- are you trying to recreate what's at the Ten Mile location? McNutt: Yes, Mayor. Simison: Okay. And they -- they function as a separate entrance and exit, even though they are there through the same basic portal. It's you are -- basically you are getting traffic to rotate through if it's -- Cavener: I see that. Okay. I don't love that, but I at least see it's -- it's separating a conflict point. Simison: It's better than connecting to -- I -- I'm -- I'm just thinking if you had a connection to the Mattress Firm right next to it it would seem kind of weird. Cavener: I guess I would prefer the -- the way the Nampa location is set up, but this is -- Simison: Oh, you like the Nampa Costco? Cavener: There is -- there is two closer to me than the -- this one I'm excited for. Simison: No, I'm -- I'm -- that -- that -- I guess it's just that that entire like -- that place is -- that's worse than putting a Five Guy -- or a In-N-Out next to a Costco out of the Nampa one. That place is crazy. Cavener: We are moving. We are getting right. Amanda, thank you for the explanation. I appreciate it. McNutt: You are welcome. Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Just so that I understand the lines and arrows, Lot 4 is the southwest corner of what we are looking at in the center and you have got solid lines coming in. So, if you are coming east on Tower can you turn left into Lot 4 with this proposal or is that only if you are west on Tower you have a right turn only into Lot 4? How -- how can you access Lot 4 if you don't do it at the -- at what staff is recommending being a single entry point? McNutt: Yeah. Mayor and Councilman Whitlock, I believe you can turn left and right into there. It's just not shown. But you can kind of see the -- the small black arrow Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 47 of 57 there. I think you will be able to, but, to be honest, I'm not completely sure where that barrier is going to be. Oh. Okay. So, yeah, it would be a right turn only. Whitlock: And, Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: And, then, to exit from Lot 4 you would go up and out and onto -- whatever that road is. McNutt: Momentum. Whitlock: Momentum. Which you could turn left on as you leave Lot 4. Okay. McNutt: Yes. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Seeing no one else online or in the room that would like to comment on this, would move that we closed the public hearing. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor, I will just start things off with my thoughts. I think that -- Simison: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: I think that's a reasonable proposal to try to bifurcate the -- the two uses there. I think driving both the fuel station and the occupants of Lot 4 into one entry and exit seems a little heavy to me, so I think what they have proposed here is an opportunity for both ingress and egress to Lot 4 that -- that seems to work for me. So, if there is no other comments I'm ready to make a motion. Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: I would move -- after considering all staff, applicant and public testimony I move to approve File No. H-2025-0041 as presented in the staff report for the hearing Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 48 of 57 date of December 16th, 2025, with the following modification: That we do allow for the removal of Condition 5 and accept the proposal by the applicant for access to Lot 4. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 23. Is there discussion on the motion? If not clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, absent; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 24. Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm Townhomes (H-2024-0072) by Brighton Corporation, generally located at the corner of S. Tavistock Ave. and E. Hill Park Street with the inclusion of the following parcels: R3636090060, R3636090040, R363080240, S1133212576 and R3636080110. A. Request: Rezone of 5.45 acres of land from the C-N zoning district to the R-15 zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 70 homes and 18 common lots spanning across 9.126 acres. C. Request: Development Agreement Modification to supersede the existing development agreement. Simison: Next item is Item 24, which is a public hearing for Hill's Century Farm Townhomes, H-2024-0072. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Napoli: Mayor, Members of the Council, next item on the agenda is the preliminary plat, development agreement modification and rezone for Hill's Century Farm Townhomes. The applicant requests a rezone of 5.45 acres from the C-N zoning district to the R-15 zoning district, a preliminary plat consisting of 70 homes and 18 common lots spanning across 9.1 acres and a new development agreement to supersede the existing development agreement. As shown on the screen the existing zoning is C-N and R-15 and the FLUM designation is mixed-use neighborhood. There is that rezone exhibit. This property currently is already zoned R-15, so these are the C-N portions that they are requesting be zoned R-15 as well. Here is an overall concept plan of the area. So, this broader mixed-use neighborhood was established through a Comprehensive Plan amendment in 2015 allowing for a diverse mix of uses. The existing C-N zoning was originally part of the concept plan that envisioned three commercial pad sites, which would be these three right here on the north side of the proposed development, 76 Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 49 of 57 assisted -- a 76 unit assisted living facility on the east side, which is this right here, which is the other C-N portion contemplated to be rezoned, while the R-15 portion that is existing, which is the independent living that's depicted right here. In addition the mixed-use neighborhood designation requires residential uses to comprise between 30 and 60 percent of the overall area. The applicant did provide calculations and staff did as well and staff's calculations came out 59.2 percent, which was consistent with the mixed-use designation guidelines. In addition, the subject development is proposed to have 7.8 dwelling units per acre, which is within the six to 12 units per acre that's desired in the mixed-use neighborhood designation. The applicant cites a change in market demand as a basis for the requested rezoning and development agreement modification. While staff is generally supportive of the overall concept plan, there are concerns regarding the continued reduction of commercial pad sites in south Meridian where neighborhood serving uses, commercial opportunities are limited. It should also be noted that much of the property proposed for rezoning was previously approved for an assisted living facility, a residential use within a commercial zone. The City Council should carefully consider -- or consider whether rezoning the commercial pad sites is appropriate. In addition, according to the student generation rates, the development will create 43 school-aged children. Currently the three schools that will service this development are Hillsdale Elementary School, Lake Hazel Middle School and Mountain View High School. Both Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High School are overcapacity for the 24-25 enrollment. Staff is asking the City Council to carefully consider whether rezoning the commercial pad sites -- or the commercial sites is appropriate considering the school capacities in the nearby -- in the schools that would serve this development. A total of 1.7 acres or 19.3 percent of open space is proposed, consisting of linear open space, parkways and a shared open space greater than 5,000 square feet. In addition, Hillsdale Park is directly south across East Hill Park Street, which would be just down here. The applicant is proposing a picnic area on the site as greater than -- a picnic area for a total of two amenities meeting the UDC requirements. Access to the proposed development -- proposed subdivision is off of South Tavistock and East Hill Park Street, both local streets. These connections are made through five proposed private streets, which meet the requirements in the UDC. In addition, the applicant is proposing to complete the extension of East Hill Park Street, which is highlighted right here with this development, which would actually connect Tavistock with Hillsdale Avenue, which is the collector roadway that runs on the eastern boundary of the -- of the development. According to ACHD's staff report 502 vehicle trips per day are expected to be generated by this development and that is an acceptable level of service to accommodate these trips. The applicant submitted conceptual building elevations -- the applicant submitted conceptual building elevations, including a variety of materials, including stone, brick, veneer, EFIS, board and bat and metal accents. The Commission did recommend approval of this application and at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting there was discussion about the written testimony from 31 citizens and verbal testimony from an additional three citizens with concerns regarding school capacities, traffic and safety, parking ratios, utility capacities, density of the proposed development and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. As noted above Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View Schools are over capacity. The citizens described the traffic in this area as gridlocked and which raised city concerns. In Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 50 of 57 addition, the citizens were concerned with the data used by ACHD, which dates back to 2019. Since the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing we have received written testimony from Martin Hill with concerns over building height and Martin Hill is the gentleman that actually donated -- I believe the park -- Hillsdale Park and the property that the YMCA is on. He submitted a copy of the agreement back when the park was donated that his view would not be obstructed with future development. However, the city was not a part of this agreement. So, that's just something to note that the city is not a party in that agreement. And we also received testimony from Sam Scranton with concerns over keeping mixed-use commercial and residential. He referenced the hearing for Centerville, which was done back in 2021 by CBH Homes to the west that was rezoned commercial to residential further -- further limiting commercial services in the area. And at this time I will stand for any questions that you have. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor. I have a question for staff, but it's different staff. I have a question for Mr. Nary. Simison: Okay. Little Roberts: Regarding the agreement that we weren't a part of, but yet it feels like we were a part of, because we were very much it seemed like conductive and involved in the whole setup of that. Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, so Nick is correct, the city was not a party of the agreement, but there is a view easement that is recorded by Mr. Hill that he does have an easement through that -- through that property, but it's not through the -- it's not through the city's property and I believe it's not through this property, so that's the -- actually, it may be part of the park property restriction, but I don't recall. I would have to look at -- I hadn't seen that today. But we weren't -- it's correct, we weren't a party to it, but we certainly were aware of it. I mean that was part of the whole discussion around the park donation, the Y -- the Y that was coming in and all of that that happened at the same time. So, we are definitely we knew that was there. Little Roberts: Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions for staff? Would the applicant like to come forward? Bensky: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. Eli Bensky. 2929 West Navigator Drive. Thank you, Nick, for your presentation. We are here for Hill's Century Farm Townhomes for the rezone, preliminary plat and development agreement. Sorry, Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 51 of 57 I'm trying my clicker from up here and I might not. Let me grab my laptop. Thank you. This property is located generally off of Amity and Eagle highlighted here in yellow. The property is currently zoned commercial neighborhood and R-15 and we are requesting a rezone of the total area to be R-15. The Comprehensive Plan and land use map designate this property as mixed-use neighborhood and we are not requesting a change to the Comprehensive Plan. The concept diagram that's included in the Comprehensive Plan shows how ideally this development should take place. So, your commercial or your community services would be on the corner of the arterial and collector, which ours are currently and, then, it would, then, gradually go towards the residential. So, here we are proposing the Hill's Century Farm Townhomes and, then, bordering that is the single family residential, which would be the Century Farm Cadence and, then, the greater Century Farm community as well. I do want to notate that the streets within this development connect directly to the drive aisles in the commercial and so do the pedestrian connectivity points. As Nick mentioned, the residential uses are required to be less than 60 percent in this designation. He did also mention we have a little bit of difference in our math. After thinking about this I do believe that it's this brown portion between our -- that's like disconnected in the brown. That's actually been donated to the park. So, I think that's where our math is not coming together. Our math said 57, his says 59 percent. Regardless, we are within the threshold of the future land use map. I do want to point out when we started this project as part of our master plan the park, the school and the YMCA sites were all part of the mixed-use area. Since, then, there has been a comp plan realignment brought on by the city that re-designated that to civic area. It is just something that we wanted to point out, because it is something that we were well aware of at the time and we were well within the residential percentages. Again we still do meet the comp plan, but it is something we want to point out. As Nick mentioned, one of the concerns in this area is that we are lacking commercial between not having enough and not having enough diversity within this area. Within a mile of the intersection of Eagle and Amity these are the commercial uses that are available to residents and people that are driving through this part of the valley. In the Comprehensive Plan the MUN sample uses are listed here. In green is everything that is being provided in the MUN area. As you will note that higher intensity uses are not expected to be within the MUN. Excuse me. So, things like a bigger drive through are not expected to be in this area. A big resident -- or a big restaurant is not expected to be in this area. With what is in the area is aligning with the Comprehensive Plan like medical offices, smaller scale gyms, independent nail salons, things like that. In Hill's Century Farm we are proposing 66 attached carriage lane homes. Carriage lane homes are accessed via the carriage lane or commonly known as an alleyway. We are also proposing three detached carriage lane homes. That is merely because of the layout. We are sitting at 7.56 dwelling units per acre. As Nick mentioned we are adjacent to community servicing commercial, as well as the park and the YMCA. We will be served by Hillsdale Elementary, Lake Hazel Middle, Mountain View High School and we are currently working with West Ada School District to provide a new school site in southern -- in south Meridian service area. One thing I would like to point out as it was a point of conversation was school capacities. In yellow is Hillsdale. You will notice that the enrollment has significantly grown. However, in the brighter blue, the thicker line, you will notice that the enrollment numbers through all of southern Meridian has Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 52 of 57 actually declined. So, what this actually tells us is that there is not a capacity limit within all of our south Meridian schools, it is actually a boundary issue where we need to reallocate where students are into school. Currently West Ada School District is redrawing their boundaries on the north. Once they are done with that they are going to be redrawing boundaries in south Meridian as well. When we spoke with them they did say that they don't anticipate it being the year after they finished North Meridian, but that it is something that they are going to be considering immediately. Another thing that I would like to note is that Brighton is committed to the community and the education here. We have donated land to complete the off-site infrastructure for the construction of this very school that we are talking about, Hillsdale Elementary. We have also donated land and completed the site -- off-site infrastructure for the construction of South Meridian Gem Prep that is off of Lake Hazel. We are actively working with West Ada School District to ready an additional school site that's going to serve the south Meridian area and an additional school that's going to serve grades 6 through 12 also here in south Meridian. That's not to discount other things that we are doing within the greater Meridian area, but south Meridian is, obviously, the point of conversation tonight. In terms of the streets, the internal portion of Hill's Century Farm Townhomes is going to be served by private streets. The main reason for private streets here is because we are connecting directly to drive aisles and ACHD does not allow us to do that, so we are required to do the private streets here. The dotted pink shows where on-street parking is permitted. The solid pink is no on-street parking. The blue is the public streets that will gain access to this community and, then, the orange is our carriage lane, which are no parking, because we don't support that on this. The amenities within this development included a picnic shelter and five foot detached sidewalks. We are proposing 19.3 percent of qualified open space, well above the 15 percent required. These are some of the homes that you will see in this development. On the bottom left they are the detached. Again we only have three of those, but it's important that you guys see what those would look like. In addition we have our paired units. This is also to be visible at the Pinnacle Viera Development. So, the top right photo is of that development and this is what we ideally will see. What -- if this is developed out. We do concur with staff's conditions of approval and we also request your guys' approval here tonight. I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, thank you. Do you happen to have a map that would show if we can see the Hill property and that view regarding the townhomes? Bensky: Yes. Okay. So, here is actually a side by side. On the left we have the proposed of this project and on the right we have what the previously approved with the assisted living would have been. The yellow is what was in the agreement that you guys thought -- it was like a grayscale scan. So, we overlaid it with our master plan just Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 53 of 57 to make it a little bit easier to see. But the yellow is that viewpoint to Table Rock. The agreement was that it goes through the park and -- I'm not sure if that part was written, I apologize, but the agreement was with the YMCA and through their property. It was not through our development. So, the yellow still remains visible through the YMCA's property. Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: So, the concern was the assisted living. Was it a single story? Because kind of the way I read it the concern was a single versus two story. But, then, if it's out -- if -- I'm guessing that it's -- you are saying it's out of the development or the line of sight agreement as it was written. Bensky: Yes. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Council Little Roberts. The slide that we have now actually shows the height differences. So, this is the approved Viera Assisted Living Heights. So, it was supposed to be single story. However, it was also supposed to be taller than our townhomes are proposed to be. Little Roberts: Thank you. Simison: Council, additional questions? A sideways question that may or may not even be relevant, but I only ask this because I know a restaurant owner who has been trying to find property in south Meridian to build a restaurant. Is what you are saying a restaurant would not be a suitable use -- a sit-down restaurant in this area because it's not in the -- it wasn't in the listing that you -- was articulated and I guess that's -- I don't know if that's for yourself or Nick. In his current zoning situation would a sit-down restaurant be eligible in south -- in this location or not? Napoli: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, so, yes, those are sample uses. The comp plan is guiding, you know, sample uses, but, yes, the restaurant is the permitted use in the C-N zoning district. That is correct. So, it would be principally permitted under current zoning designation. That is correct. So, be administrative approvals. Simison: Okay? Thank you. All right. Is there anybody who signed up to provide testimony on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, no. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present who would like to provide testimony on this item? I do see someone raising their hand. So, Julie, you can unmute yourself. There you go. Edwards: Hello. This is Julie Edwards again. 1310 East Mary Lane. I just wanted to say that, you know, I -- I have kids in the school district. I attend a lot of the school board meetings and I see the stress that is on these schools with Hillsdale as one of them in particular, along with Mountain View. They are -- I mean I think Mountain View Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 54 of 57 is 350 over capacity at this point. I'm not sure exactly what Hillsdale is, but if anything I feel like this location is better for the over 55 community than the one that was just approved to the south, because while it would still be -- schools are still going to be an issue to the south, but those kids that would be attending Hill's -- zone to Hillsdale would have to be bused elsewhere most likely. So, that's an additional cost to the school and understand that Brighton has donated land to the school district potentially, but the bigger issue is we are not going to get a school until we get money and I feel like, you know, a bond goes out for that and residents don't want to vote for it, because all of these subdivisions and communities are being approved. So, their thoughts are why should we pay for that? Why aren't developers paying for the schools. You know, we didn't ask for it kind of thing. So, it's a big school issue in my mind. So, I see over 55 community and that wouldn't have any impact on the schools. That's all. Thank you for your time. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Okay. Thank you. Is there anybody else who would like to provide testimony on this item? If not, would the applicant like to close? Bensky: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I do want to bring up Julie's point. Yes, typically it would go through a bond, but West Ada actually already has funds for two schools. They have funds for a school that will be going in Star and they do have funds for the school for the land site that we have donated in southern Meridian. Simison: Council, any further questions for the applicant? Okay. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I guess no one else has anything, I vote -- I move that we close the public hearing. Cavener: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay. The ayes have and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: If we don't have any discussion on this, I will -- I would be happy to move forward with a motion. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 55 of 57 Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I'm -- I'm happy to have a little discussion on this one. Little Roberts: Okay. Cavener: I -- Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I think it's important to first commend the applicant, because there is no other organization that's done more to address the overcrowding in our community across the valley than Brighton and I -- I don't say that flippantly. It's true. My family has benefited directly because of your donations and I -- I think that that is -- I know there is many families that have benefited from that. This Council has heard me talk time and time again about how special south Meridian is to me and I know it's special to you all as well and I have no doubt that if this is approved that you will build a high quality development and, yes, it will impact the schools in that area. Century Farms -- I still think this year continues to be the most bused neighborhood in all of Meridian. We have kids outside the neighborhood that are bused into Hillsdale. Students who live in that neighborhood that can see Hillsdale that are bused to other schools. Mountain View remains the most overcapacity high school in the state of Idaho and I do not see that going away anytime soon. So, while the district continues to shrink, the enthusiasm to live in south Meridian continues to grow. I -- I can't support the request for rezone tonight, not because of those reasons that I stated, but it's because I think commercial property in south Meridian is a vital resource. We had a similar request a year ago. I said almost the same thing word for word. I'm going to remain consistent tonight. It's not to say that at some point maybe this does make sense, but I don't think it makes sense right now and so I will not be voting in favor if there is a request for a rezoning tonight. Simison: Thank you. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Just a little perspective from just over 24 hours ago I had the opportunity to talk with two people from West Ada School District at a different meeting and was discussing capacity in schools and enrollment and where those numbers are going and the fact that we saw some parts of the valley that were going down and some of them were going up and this isn't an answer by any means, but this was the answer of the day, which was we are actively working on a realignment of which students go to which schools. Stand by it's coming up in January. So, it left me rather hopeful that they are finally at a point they have been going through a process that they are going to be going to their school board meeting with a plan and coming forward publicly with that next month. I don't know what that means for north versus south, but, obviously, it's something they understand, because they do have schools that are really low and they Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 56 of 57 have schools that are over capacity. I'm hoping that they help us on that end by rebalancing the populations. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, if there is no more comments to be had, I would move that we go ahead and -- I would move we approve -- Napoli: Mr. Mayor, can I interject real quick? Simison: Where is that coming from -- Napoli: Over here. Simison: Thanks, Nick. Sorry. Napoli: Sorry. I actually talked with the applicant. There is a lot -- we -- in the staff report we asked for Lot 13 to be removed to add a micro path. They were in agreement with that at the time. However, they do want to keep -- that leaves a single parcel below that to where it would be a single family home. So, they want to remove actually Lot 12 instead of Lot 13. So, with your motion, if you guys are going to make a motion in favor of this project, I would ask that you would amend condition 2-E to remove Lot 12 instead of Lot 13. That would be my -- my only request. Little Roberts: Okay. With that notice, thank you. Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I move that we approve H-2024-0072 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 16th, 2025, with the following modification. On 2-E to remove Lot 12 instead of Lot 13. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Item 24. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, maybe this is late into late meetings I can -- my vote be recorded as a nay, please? Thank you. Roll Call- Cavener, nay; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, absent; Whitlock, yea. Simison: Three ayes. One nay. And the item is agreed to. Meridian City Council December 16,2025 Page 57 of 57 MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. ONE NAY. TWO ABSENT. Cavener: I appreciate, Mr. Mayor, for catching that. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: All right. With that we are at the end of our agenda. Anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Last meeting of the year. So, I move that we adjourn and wish everyone Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays and a Happy New Year. We will see you in 2026. Overton: Second. Simison: Motion and second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:25 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 1 / 6 2026 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the December 2, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session December 2,2025 Page 24 of 24 Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to come out of Executive Session. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and we are out of Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Simison: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Cavener. Cavener: I move we adjourn our work session. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:00 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 12-16-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 12-16-2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the December 2, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council December 2,2025 Page 23 of 23 Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Resolution No. 25-2550. Is there any discussion? Do we need a roll call on this one, Mr. Nary? Nary: Yes. Simison: With that clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Thank you very much. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Okay. Council, anything in our future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move we adjourn our meeting. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:00 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 12-16-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 12-16-2025 V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Tanner Creek Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0170) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-083864 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 vbailey 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivision Name: Tanner Creek Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: 1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only Record Number: ESMT-2025-0170 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 16th day of December 2025 between Corey D. Barton ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS,the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page I Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-083864 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 2 of 6 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures,carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: COREY D.BARTON (:: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on becee,,6e�o , 2025,by Corey D. Barton, owner. Notary Stamp Below ADAIR KOLTES Notary Signature Notary Public- State of Idaho ry g Commission Number 30052 My Commission Expires: (O—OS' My Commission Expires 06-05-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-083864 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 3 of 6 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Sim on ayor 12-16-2025 j � SEAL Attest by Chris hnson, ,xy Clerk - -2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 12-16-2025 Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Stamp Below CHARLENE WAY Cha&wWa�' COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Signature 3-28-2028 STATE OF IDAHO My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-083864 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 4 of 6 Exhibit A Legal Description Tanner Creek Subdivision No. 1 — Water and Sewer Easements Easements being over a portion of the SE1/4 of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Easement A Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13, from which a 5/8" diameter rebar with an illegible cap marking the northwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13 bears N 0030'30" E a distance of 2666.35 feet; Thence N 4004'24n E a distance of 2428.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 89"17'58" E a distance of 123.81 feet to a point; Thence S 0a33'52"W a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89'17'58" W a distance of 91.91 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 19.20 feet along the arc of a 55.00 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 20°00'07" and a long chord bearing N 73°45'05"W a distance of 19.10 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Thence a distance of 22.06 feet along the arc of a 15.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 84°15'39" and a long chord bearing N 41°37'19" W a distance of 20.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Easement A contains 0.053 acres (2,302 square feet) and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Easement B Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13, from which a 5/8" diameter rebar with an illegible cap marking the northwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13 bears N 0°30'30" E a distance of 2666.35 feet; Thence N 3°54'56" E a distance of 1939.19 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 0°30'30" E a distance of 18.00 feet to a point; Thence S 89029'30" E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point; Thence S 0°30'30" W a distance of 18.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89029'30" W a distance of 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Easement B contains 0.012 acres (540 square feet) and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Tanner Creek Subdivision No. I L t.,�w sSurveying ana Consulting Water&Sewer Easements Job No.25-44 Page 1 of 2 Instrument # 2025-083864 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 5 of 6 Easement C Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13, from which a 5/8" diameter rebar with an illegible cap marking the northwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13 bears N Od30'30" E a distance of 2666.35 feet; Thence N 19°42'45" E a distance of 2083.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 0033'52" E a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; Thence S 89°26'05" E a distance of 110.50 feet to a point; Thence S 0°33'55" W a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89d26'05" W a distance of 110.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Easement C contains 0.051 acres (2,210 square feet) and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Easement D Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13, from which a 5/8" diameter rebar with an illegible cap marking the northwest corner of said SE1/4 of Section 13 bears N 0°30'30" E a distance of 2666.35 feet; Thence N 19°24'47" E a distance of 2005.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N Od33'52" E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point; Thence S 89°26'08" E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point; Thence S 0°33'52" W a distance of 30.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89°26'08" W a distance of 30.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Easement D contains 0.021 acres (900 square feet) and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS oNP� LA No s Land Solutions, PC �5` s T F p December 1, 2025 �� F 11118 ��2�4►��' s _ F OF �`D TON W NP �_, Land Surveying and Consulting Instrument#2025-083864 Exhibit B 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 6 of 6 TANNER CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 1 - WATER & SEWER EASEMENTS LOCATED IN THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO CP&F INST. CP&F INST. NO. 108050251 NO. 109101258 C 1/4 1/4 W. WALTMAN LN. S89-26'08"E .2642.71' 13-Q 18 I< LINE TABLE JEASEMENT A LINE LENGTH BEARING JAREA=2,302 Si. Ll 18.00' NO'30'30"E C5 123 81' L2 30.00' S89'29'30"E O.B.P. S 8 9!1±'�"58�- C-4 z �E _Tj F'�Qx nn&hL 7DS T.I L3 18.00' SO'30'30"W vi co �6� 1 1 !t! cn IN8791 F58"W14 U) M 0 \91.91, jLL� cn u L4 30.00' N89*29'30"W =) • (n Ln L5 20.00' NO*33'52"E C-D PI 1131.:z Ln t LLJ L6 20.00' SO'33'55"W I to L7 30.00' NO-33-52-E 04 • L8 30.00' S89*26'08"E —cm Li W. GRANITIEVIII-LE ST. L9 30.00' SO'33'52"W b CD 1W L10 30.00' N89*26'08"W V) U) EASEMENT IM EASEMENT C AREA=2,210 S.F.1 --------------- W, RUDDY DR. 110.50' EASEMENT Q '�S89*26'05"E EASEMENT D- U-) U.J AREA=540 S.F. AREA=900 S.F. P.O.B. L2 j P..:.... ... .. N89'26'05"W 4 w9*424 L8 110.50' P.O.B. ' 13: �19'24'47"E2005.01' P.O.B. L101/4 24W OVERLAND.RD...................... ............ CP&F INST. NO. CURVE TABLE 2022-015713 POINT OF CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD COMMENCEMENT C1 19.20' 55.00' 20'00'07" N73*45'05"W 19.10' C2 22.06' 15.00' 84'15'39" N41'37'19"W NL LA ND � ST 0 O. Lan 'uOns Z . 0 2 'L,5 0 4? .,,tZ o I,I z,5 La 0, 'q- 4 "Land Surveying and Consulting 01 75' 150' 300' OF 231 E.5TH ST. MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.iandsolutions.bz JOB NO. 23-64J V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Tanner Creek Waltman Lane Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0172) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-083863 Boise,Idaho Pgs=7 vbailey 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivisiort Narne: Tanner Creek Waltman Lane Sanitary sewer c&water Main Easement Number: � 7denti6,this 0 asetnent by sequential-niber if the project cantains more than onc cascncwt of this type.S-iustruclicrWehecklist for additional information. For Internal Use C3r1y ESMT-2025-0172 Record Number: SAM I A,RY SEWER AND'WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made thisl 6th day of December 20 25 between C r A ('Grantor")and dre City of Meridian,.an Idaho Murricipa Corporation("Grantee`") AREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described, and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others, and V%rHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey`into the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such, facilities at any and all times. T 014AVE AND T G HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee; its successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after makit g repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertal6ng such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this casement that was placed there in violation at this casement,. Sanitary Sewer-and Water Main Easement Page l Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-083863 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 2 of 7 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on r)- date) by 0A141 A 014 tAP4 (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a Yep�esA_ tive capacity, or strike thefollowing ifsigning in an individual capacity] on behalf of nzeu J?:ja,-faA (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: t7 WAel- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Noru-y Stamp Below LADAIR KOLTES Notary Signature NOtary Public- State of Idaho My Commission Expires: J "&5'10 mission Number30052_ mission Expires 06-05-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-083863 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 3 of 7 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robe E. Sim'son, ayor 12-16-2025 � -- SEAL Attest by Chr` Johns lerk 12-16-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, } ss. County of Ada } This record was acknowledged before me on 12-16-2025 (date) by Robert E. Sirmson and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notar, Stamp Below CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Signature STATE OF IDAHO My Cormnission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-083863 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 4 of 7 lam E N G I N E E R I N G November 17,2025 Project No.:24-036 Tanner Creek City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement Legal Description Exhibit A Parcels of land for a City of Meridian sewer and water easement being a portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 13,which bears N89°26'10"W a distance of 2,642.64 feet from a brass cap marking the East 1/4 corner of said Section 13,thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4,S89°26'10"E a distance of 288.48 feet; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00°33'50"W a distance of 25,00 feet to the southerly right-of-way of W.Waltman Ln.and being POINT OF BEGINNING 1. Thence following said southerly right-of-way, S89"26'10"E a distance of 30.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as POINT"A"; Thence leaving said southerly right-of-way,S00°33'50"W a distance of 45.50 feet; Thence N89°26'10"W a distance of 30.00 feet; Thence N00°33'50"E a distance of 45.50 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 1. Said parcel contains 1,365 square feet, more or less. TOGETHER WITH: Commencing at a point previously referred to as POINT"A",thence following the southerly right-of-way of said W.Waltman Ln.,S89°26'10"E a distance of 726.56 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 2. Thence following said southerly right-of-way,589°26'10"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence leaving said southerly right-of-way,S00°33'50"W a distance of 38.50 feet; Thence N89"26'10"W a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence N00033'50"E a distance of 3850 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 2. Said parcel contains 770 square feet, more or less. Said description contains a total of 2,135 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. 1a� � b S Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof, g � ' 12459 Q tv OF av< L. ft 5725 North Discovery Way a Boise, Idaho 83713 a 208.639,6939 w kmengiip.com Instrument # 2025-083863 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 5 of 7 P:\24-036\CAD\SURVEY\EXNIBITS\24.038 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER AND WATER EASEAAENT.DWG,CRAIG DRAPER,1111712025,DWG TO PDF.PC3,08.SX31 L(PDFJ -CID Z p z 4 O O Z O G7 00 p ;U p z Z Oo 4 O G7 I > ;0Z t7 M 1�-A 0 N00'33'50"E m -<G z —— 45.50' — En 0 © coo,I I O0 O N In z W W 00 W Flo es 00 � �l Ct 0 O W Ln ; W I o I 19 �-- _ a5,50--- � I m S0D'33'50"W Z o `R q N (AC V In 0 c Qi � D Im � O � fJ c7t 0 I w 3 =i O !� :U :3 v N z r z� NDO'33'50"E N w N 38.50' � cn o p Flo n� ID `< © 38.50' o 00 z Uj ----- O u: i N S00'33'S0"W o N p 00� r+ o m I T, to C> p rTr G) as o o z In z to N -n p C-Z It Z Cif q It 33 Ln © I > z Tl W to 0 S. Meridian Rd. E77 � v O z m m Exhibit B ooze M a 3mm0- City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement m �Z w A rn wwmm 3 Tanner Creep - Waltman Lane Improvements 'vNF A z W N NW1/4 SE1/4 Sec. 13,T3N, R1W, BM, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho C) � � Instrument # 2025-083863 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 6 of 7 s89°26'10"e 30 3 b c � v M a o c h 30 n8 610"w City of [Meridian Sewer and water Easement Parcel 1 24-036 11/17/2025 Scale: 1 inch=6 feet File: Tract 1:0.0313 Acres(1365 Sq.Feet),Closure:n00.0000e 0.00 ft.(1/999999),Perimeter=151 ft. 01 s89.2610e 30 02 s00.3350w 45.5 03 n89.2610w 30 04 n00.3350e 45.5 Instrument # 2025-083863 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 7 of 7 s89°26'10"e 20 d 3 0 0 M u m e I� m cvy � �Q C N 20 n8V26'10"w City of Meridian Sewer and water Easement Parcel 2 24-036 11/17/2025 Scale: 1 inch= 5 feet File: Tract 1:0.0177 Acres(770 Sq.Feet),Closure:n00.0000e 0.00 ft.(11999999),Perimeter-117 ft. 01 s89.2610e 20 02 s00.3350w 38.5 03 n89.2610w 20 04 n00.3350e 38.5 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Reveille Ridge No. 1 (FP-2025-0007), by Kent Brown Planning Services, located at 7355 S. Eagle Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2025 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 68 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0007 LOTS AND 23 COMMON/OTHER ) LOTS ON 18.32 ACRES OF LAND ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL IN THE R-8 AND R-15 ZONING ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT DISTRICTS FOR REVEILLE ) RIDGE NO. 1 ) BY: KENT BROWN PLANNING ) SERVICES ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on December 2, 2025 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) I 1-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING REVEILLE RIDGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 AND THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE I EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REVEILLE RIDGE NO. 1 FP-2025-0007 Page I of 3 2025, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 11/4/2025,by CODY M. MCCAMMON, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 8," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated December 2, 2025, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REVEILLE RIDGE NO. 1 FP-2025-0007 Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 16th day of December , 2025. By: Robert E. Simison 12-16-2025 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 12-16-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 12-16-2025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR REVEILLE RIDGE NO. 1 FP-2025-0007 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORTC�WE COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: 12/2/2025 Legend TO: City Council Pro:et Lflcfli�or FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 5 � I sallenkmeridiancity.org 45 I I SUBJECT: FP-2025-0007 Reveille Ridge No. 1 ---- ----- PROPERTY LOCATION: / I 7355 S. Eagle Rd., in the east 1/2 of Section 5, T.2N.,R.IE. - Ice 1 4P I i' : " I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 68 buildable lots and 23 common/other lots on 18.32 acres of land in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts for the first phase of Reveille Ridge Subdivision. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Kent Brown,Kent Brown Planning Services—3161 E. Springwood Dr.,Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Corey Barton, Endurance Holdings— 1977 E. Overland Rd., Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat(H- 2023-0050)as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The proposed final plat depicts two(2)fewer building lots and the same amount of common open space area as shown on the approved preliminary plat and complies with the phasing plan. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required by UDC 11-6B-3C. Page 1 IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval below in Section VI. Page 2 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 4/7/2024) ONI '-LN3"aO13A3G A0011M-L eW0 aavai�x�xx.bisx��,x�x31.3 aq ._ •aul'$uNGOUIOU ,(alle(%� -y% 5a` - - _ NOISI/�IOHf15 30aIN 31113/�32! 1 (/�/ 2 alb'—Id .l�l`dNIW1132�d T —V. 9 O F N o -I Se f 15. 3 9 d k g9 E go © F� Ng a Z 00 HORN p Nm a O 0.��zFi i 5 Haa W a .. CQ $ s w 3a as w5 .z.P4� � Zoaavw,N 3s kyss98ep as g"f: �� a Ws ff W wwwGwi�� a W aU c+ww a gaaa�3n $ €a P; N i iiii x�e€six e - ,� _5_ Z sm;��•e€a"lit 3u$s $ �$ J-1 ao_aaaaaa © e ® © © ® % Xx 1 C5 g5 s ��e�see�ee •� � ® / a3/ ;�9F a.a•xja=.x=. a� §595539393919959p�gz ppppppppppppppppppqq pppppkp•pp, iiiiiiii]]a M —.3Z———___—— — -—F 1.—. Y 1 Y $�3�i�l�®39S3i9� �BBBFEEFttgi��B §g3p9p3p9Q9p9pp3pp3p9pp9ppp1g5pp9pp9yy9 iiiiiiai35231ii Page 3 B. Final Plat(dated: 11/4/25) g E •0 1pp C LLJ m ,f7f I W G c 9 ro kh o X; j $ .n C t p m zg: 9�y � - �, yg6 y wU n 'e'ar` Ek{b gN fl L■d ,Q 6 ff o tm oil � OZw S U7 p o1 � 35�•� xb h J� � ry £i I gpP gas 69 y�+ r $ ` i 6 I % rr n � Oi WTI ^ yy m g �' v�vw�,;, ,zgaLa 3„e�,faaae+ .eeacc 3.es.aoaor+ s°vQr._eo,mas Page 4 C. Landscape Plan(dated: August 2025) QQY�IOMMMI'Id lO�ig3YOY3iui� , - L L"oN NOISI/I109f15 300121 31113A321 '3Uj'$miaau¢u3 Salle%'!j p, il//%r' ,°° •; '�� NV-Id 3d VOSO NV7 -LV1d 1VNId vy �iie S i (Id 31JV3 tSl i ®1 I: i -r f. I I I I V I I I I ! I J r I I I LU z 00 w — Co u) w Dwjrn J — Q i ❑ J ❑ Z U) w - ' C7 of i 3 w O wD4 a� (nZ Page 5 r..w..°... *,III# 'ONI '1N3WdO13n3❑ Aoc:1-1QQY3IMMIIId IPIPH1MOYj1M1� —N Noisiniaens 3oalanul'�m�aau¢u36all � • N<J1d 3dC/�SaNV1 lf/1d 1VN13 A _ U _ E ZIngit DA �Es z x WC 5� z El 3NIIHO-VW 11 9NIIHOIVW � II hhA I � I - I _ I ru __ gnwwWo� 1j�, II U W U U — — — — 3 V321L')3N — — E- E- E'- E' E' Page 6 ,,........., ..,,,,,, 'I4Y;, '�NI `1N3 Wd013 n3O A'J 011211 4ayDIMINNrldINIa3-31u'la ` - �—N NOISInlaens 3�oia 3��!3naa a aul'�m�aau�u3.Sal! li -,,,,,M„✓ ,•� Nt»d 3d'd0SONV1 1V d 1VNId # — ul J� e�• op 1Eag RA= J J / z 6 W IM 77 ------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 .gi OM I D"I and 011m 3u013 : NOI�IAICIUn!; 3C)ala 31113^3al lv-ld -IVN i TH�ji ------ 3t 24" ILI 4 HIE N / , [ oi. cd Page 8 -N 'ONI O(Iyol—rd IN IMIRM31 AID L'oN Nc)lrlA1(3EIn5 :300121 :11113A:311 Aall :1,JV 0 S Cl N V-1 1V-1,J 1 V N I A lu ju P-7 ! 1i *A% t. Vy Page 9 i3l to J! , I 40? - 4�001 01 2 ME dip owl O al 6h Page 10 44VDI WNNN IN I-MM31 AID N NC)lrlAl(3EIf)S Aall NV7,J :3,JV0SC1NV7 _LV .1 -IVN - �ll pa �7- 7 7 7z� EM; ----- ----- LU '7 l2k LU --- 7�7 Z. 7 z -, 03 m!'LLB 10 z -------In Page 11 - - "�NI '1N3 Wd013/�3❑ .l`J0112i1 pOV.7loxixryloxwiiiiai3IniO �I NOISI✓\Ia9flS 3ncii?' 31113 n32i a •Ouy`$uuaaul5u3Aalla(�/i - Q� ^. �N 3[✓V SS�SSV �I��JJ� l!jpm o j f rr r, 00 8 8aa O �8 - 0000 QOD"000000�'I: • O O O O- O(�U717 fl I: 8 O :• 40 1p �IVor 3 00 N a. w �r� 0-'od vq O� O h yx`n IH pO °aoN o $ _\ 0 Co o flu � 0.$� oa M o°�r'- --—as - — - - Page 12 D. Amenity Exhibit 3 QT23-7'i9' RECREATION RECREATION KP-42010 I Ages:5-12 Capacity:40-44 CFH:S' TODAY KP-42010 I Ages:5-12 Capacity:40-44 CFH:S' TODAV Clearcreek Subdivision ITNlogy Development/Nampa,Who P1 Clearcreek Subdivision lTrilagy Development/Nampa,Idaho QT23-7997 Ff rr a� RECREATION KP-42010 I Ages:S-12 Capacity:40-44 CFH:8' TODAY Clear creek Subdivision lTrilogy Development/Nampa,Itlaho 01 ME QT23-7997 52'-0" i7 Blue Line Area: 1700 Sq Ft RECREATION o KP-42010 Ages:S-12 Capacity:40-44 CFH:B' DAY Clearcreek ,mm�o KID Ti4LE a.m„,,.a„y mr . z Recreation Today Clearcreek Subdivision I Trilogy Development/Nampa,Idaho LIM T+ Page 13 E. Common Driveway Exhibits a° 201 81 All 1 j, 5 1 � I 1 - - Ilk r.} LOT 28, BLOCK 6 SHARED ACCESS FOR LOTS 25, 26 & 27 BLOCK 6 20 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 1"=20' p � Ll r-0- --9LOpE 2.00t SLWE].001i-- v[).EASNT CpVSHEN CRa� p TN QNCR ERj� alley Engineering, Inc. 4--3/4'MINUS CRV`. M R'AyE1 20' SHARED SHARED DRIVEWAY CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CADD TYPICAL `"EC-nON 1119 E.STATE STREET,SUITE 210 E 0M L �MQ313 Q EAGLE,ID MO xxw-b leyenpilrer — NOT TO SCALE Page 14 rrr (r��•r� rrrr --� ! ''a r �- - ! ! r r r I 1 + t r I fff �• it 8 i � $ � t r f r 03 I LOT 3. BLOCK 2 SHARED ACCESS FOR LOTS 1 & 2 BLOCK 2 40 0 2D 40 80 SCALE IN FEET 1"=40' � ,o•—o' 10'-0' --9-OPE 2.00E SLWE].OWi-- OF-31+1- Y avH.a CRV$HE©cearQ Y- PALf1EHi iley Engineering, Inc. 20' SHARED DRIVEWAY CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CAdd TYPICAL SECTION 1119E.STATES7REEf,SUUE210 TEL "-93e"3 5k=i-E ID 8391& „nw-ha ky S— NOT TO S[^ALE Page 15 F. Emergency Access Exhibit 14 'Pa a1�3•s s6ul,org.L.ZLO ti G 1 ,LZ'ES4Z M.Li,LL�05 A vl C d m zeeL Q a � � �•�� a� �� 3 5 6� � a o-c¢�I a j� W W W II Y��II ,a1 i'tee V i d g - y r = Y fp � nosy I Y �v1 k5 / .w $ o vo w L Ice a n /r O d �•- � � I I e s7 F 'fib A s.g In-OH U- _ Sig C `5 Z y..wU sill �L ry�, N O O n 1/0 OZ // w- or aB-•h � $�m� Sh s_ a r av p rn� /! y m §�3pFst��oaq$44s =$ N U N J �FYS.J"'ii Pf6bg oai Z O V O Q // //l •p� — //.^off O , O� / n � M3 99 ' � G $$a E � � � , 5zg N r a WV 0413 5 � 77 ' S stl8E _ �.]i 6& X I' ,LE'L5L M,171,10.0d5 �Tii di N I �; g=F R �Ihn moon"" nnnm iy�y�y�lu�nnnnnnnnnnnnnmlYnmmmnmmn�5�.,,,a„gyo,,,,a•s _ '� �� ` t' n Fa77v7dwn .LBIOLB 3.91,Nx06N ,BB'LEC 3,69,oaaON Page 16 G. Product Type Exhibit Approved with Annexation and Preliminary Plat Wdo171 A30 A 011 tJL ana�lxuixxndloureauou3 ink 8� f� NoI SI/�IQef-t5 3`J012! 31113n:J�J O fir- 'f g dJV^ LIE31Hx3 lOnaoad ..A �-• F v�i�q� s�ata 6B m W # & € d'F 04, o.a ,b 1 �i We C,W ° #� 3 co C.,j ------------- 3 e i I � _ r'7 0 II Z U z W r CC 0 TNI DN u7N KNCD 0 H. Page 17 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [annexation/preliminary plat(H-2023-0050), Development Agreement Inst. #2024-0330021. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two (2)years of the City Council's approval of the preliminary plat(by May 14,2026); or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-613-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Bailey Engineering,Inc., stamped on 11/4/25 by Cody M. McCammon, included in Exhibit B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#7: Include recorded instrument number of ACHD permanent easement. b. Note#8: Include recorded instrument number of ACHD temporary license agreement. c. Note#9: Lot 16 (Block 7)should be Lot 15 and Lot 12 (Block 8) should be Lot 11. d. Note#12: Include the recorded instrument number of the pathway easement. e. Modify Note#14 as follows: "Direct lot/parcel access to S. Eagle Rd.,E.Via Roberto Dr. and S. Recreation Ave. is prohibited." f. The construction plans shall depict a 10-foot-wide detached sidewalk/pathway along all lots on the south side of E. Via Roberto Dr. (where there is adequate area)per preliminary plat condition#2c. Parkways shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. g. Remove the street name (i.e. E. Taps St.) on the south side of Lot 1, Block 4 as it is an alley and can't be named. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Jensen Belts Assoc.,dated 12/30/24 included in Exhibit C, shall be revised as follows: a. Correct the edge of pavement(EP)depicted on Lot 3,Block 2 consistent with that depicted on the common driveway exhibit. b. Change the E.Vantage Pointe street name to E.Via Roberto Dr. consistent with the final plat and remove the alley street name(i.e. E. Taps St.). c. Depict a 10-foot-wide detached sidewalk/pathway along the south side of E. Via Roberto Dr.,a collector street,in accord with development agreement provision #5.1b. d. Change the lot numbers consistent with those depicted on the final plat. e. Depict landscaping with a mix of materials(i.e. shrubs and vegetative groundcover) within the required street buffers along S. Eagle Rd. and E.Via Roberto Dr. on Lot 15,Block 7; Lot 1, Block 5; Lots 2-9,Block 3;Lots 1,2,4 and 5,Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2,Block 1,in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3. Page 18 f. Extend the 10-foot wide multi-use pathway to the south through Lot 1,Block 5 for future extension to the south. 6. Submit a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway within the Williams Pipeline easement and along the Farr Lateral, as required by the Park's Dept. Note: The pathway only crosses Lot 1, Block 4 on this site but the entire easement can be included, including the portion(s) not included in this phase. 7. All existing structures shall be removed from the site prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature. 8. The rear and/or sides of homes on lots that face collector (E. Via Roberto Dr. & S. Recreation Ave.)(i.e.Lots 1 and 2,Block 2;Lots 2-9,Block 3;Lots 2-9, 33,Block 6;Lots 2,4-6 and 7-10,Block 8; Lots 3-10,Block 9) and arterial(S. Eagle Rd.) (i.e. Lot 2, Block 2) streets shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g. projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets. 9. Future development of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 and Lots 25-27, Block 6 shall be consistent with the common driveway exhibit included in Section V.E and the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. 10. Future development shall substantially comply with the product type exhibit approved with the annexation and preliminary plat in Section V.G. 11. The alley shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. 12. Comply with the Williams Developer's Handbook for any development and/or improvements within the Williams pipeline easement. 13. An administrative design review application shall be submitted for the single-family attached and townhome structures to ensure compliance with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 14. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works htips://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=421339&dbid=0&repo=Meridi 4401ty For other Agency Comments, copy and paste the following link in your browser: https://weblink.meridianciiy.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id=393920&dbid=0&repo=Meri dianCi Page 19 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Baratza Subdivision No. 2 (FP-2025-0025) by The Land Group, located at the southeast corner of N. Black Cat Rd. and W. McMillian Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2025 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 84 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0025 LOTS AND 6 COMMON LOTS ON ) 16.41 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT BARATZA SUBDIVISION NO. 2. ) BY: ELLA PASSEY, THE LAND ) GROUP ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on December 9, 2025 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING BARATAZA SUBDIVISION NO. 2, LOCATED IN THE NORTH '/2 OF THE NE '/4 SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4N, RANGE I W, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, I DAHO, 2025, HANDWRITTEN DATE: AUGUST 29, 2025, by JAMES R. WASHBURN, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(BARATZA SUBDIVISION NO. 2—FP-2025-0025) Page 1 of 3 PLS, SHEET 1 OF 5," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated December 9, 2025, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A"by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(BARATZA SUBDIVISION NO. 2—FP-2025-0025) Page 2 of 3 interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 16th day of December , 2025. By: Robert E. Simison 12-16-2025 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 12-16-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 12-16-2025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(BARATZA SUBDIVISION NO. 2—FP-2025-0025) Page 3 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WE PI DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 12/9/2025 Legend s a DATE: O Project Location TO: City&Mayor Council :::Area of Impact y ri1 _ a! City Limits ® ❑ ® . FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 � fritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Ella Passey, The Land Group ---- - SUBJECT: FP-2025-0025 Baratza Subdivision No. 2-FPS LOCATION: Located near the southeast corner of N. ; ' - Black Cat Road and W. McMillian Road in the North '/z of the NE 1/4 of Section _ 34,Township 4N.,Range 1 W.parcels I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Final Plat consisting of 90 lots(84 building lots, 6 common lots) on 16.41 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for Baratza Subdivision No. 2. B. Issues/Waivers None C. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. D. Decision Approved with Conditions City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview 11. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1•Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use Single-Family Residential - Existing Zoning R-8 VI.A.2 Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential VI.A.3 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Baratza Subdivision No. 2 FP-2025-0025 (copy this link into a separate browser). City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2024-0016)as required by UDC 11-613-3C.2. The submitted final plat is for the second phase of construction for the approved preliminary plat;therefore,the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS& CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. The applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval for this development FP- 2025-0010;H-2024-0016(AZ, PP); DA Inst.No. 2025-013529. 2. The final plat shown in Section V.B,prepared by The Land Group, stamped on 8/29/2025 by James R. Washburn, shall be revised prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, as follows: a. Note#12: Include the instrument number for the CC&Rs. b. Note#13: Include the instrument number for the ACHD permanent easement. c. Note#14: Include the instrument number for the ACHD temporary license agreement d. Add the recorded instrument number of the City of Meridian sewer and water easement. e. Add a note stating direct access to Black Cat Road is prohibited. 4. Prior to signature on the Phase 2 Final Plat by the City Engineer,the roundabout at McMillan Road and Black Cat Road shall be constructed and operational. 5. The landscape plan prepared by The Land Group, stamped on 11/19/2025 by Matthew T. Adams is approved as submitted. 6. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures that face N.Black Cat Road and N. Grand Lakes Way shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches, balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 7. All fencing shall be installed in accordance with UDC 11-3A-7. 8. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 9. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11- 3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 10. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-313-14. 11. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the date of approval of the preliminary plat(i.e. January 7,2025), in accord with UDC 11- 613-7, in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. 12. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of ACHD. 13. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis B. Meridian Public Works SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. The bottom of structural footing shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation. 2. Maintenance of any irrigation and/or drainage pipes or ditches crossing a lot is the responsibility of the lot owner unless such responsibility is assumed by an irrigation/drainage entity or lot owner's association. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department, and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-313-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing,landscaping,amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non- health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-413. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting(http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval,which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6.). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. C. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridiancity.oLvlWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=420806&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X D. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https:llweblink.meridianciU.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=420806&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X V. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommend approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. B. City Council: Approval City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action ' 1 1 . ct Location - -. of Impact 0 Analysis _ MCMI�L-L-AN W - J a �IIIIII!' Legend Project Location t 111�1 p�.I . ♦. mn--mnnm,: mm�li, nn All nu►�► �IOr�_ I� NINE Are °III � 1■ Illll C• •UI a C� /• �� ♦ n • of IllO.:::nnm C7 II Ill. Inllll p� i ��ry• .IOIIIIII II ■i Innu►i mn uml 11'IIIIIu►�`_ •�1'■.nnnm 1111� nn IIIOIIdllll ill IIIIIIi��■ IIIO� � �Illl�I:Imll � t®Alli■�IIIIIIIIII,I'llll0l Illll. = ��:�Illl1 (IIIII►�IIIIIIIIII► �II�I e'1111np�IIIl11(lllllll llllm �"�a.II'I/IIIII �-►��Illllllllll►�� Iuumn►�iunm nnnm nmunu poop nm MCMI�L-L-AN 111IIIIIIIII "" IIIIIIIIIIIII�� 1111' 1-I��a I �117��. �`��• _ lllllll ,IIIIIIIIII�1 G��: a-_i nnm pion inr� �II�11...� C IIIIIIII �' III .i �i1 rim �� W pl I /Il.ni ilpj a:■ 1'111 I►I♦�j Inn numb nnnw C7__ n:-�� mnq �� ry�'I n1111 1 ♦��♦�hm nnnunnnn �mm�r J �nIr11111IV'i i�nnnj�•i 7II� 1p111j11►I�:�IIIIl1l11111��11111111 1 IIIIIII .=�� N ��In11'�' i<I1m11,1� 11111 111 1•��II1O111n11�:Illnlll lunar anal �p�/ � ::iiltj/•'�/IIIIl1��1�A p► :ME llnllnlll =iiiiiii, Innlllll= nit��Il �nI r /nn nlnllln►� /'u IIIry i Ip1►��I/ III WelO11Oln 1111��111111` J�.p a �a a. 11► � 11 •/ ��I /ups�� ==??ee p pip W �► IUIp►� 1 �i�ii��iuii•' WnITBD,4i��/ � �►�i�. ■� AII�:L innl IIIIIm , uIp►Inp� It, Oof WN.Ill./p1 / lluli►%j ii1�Ij �., np�� nn.•nnnm d,q 1 I� um•�nnnm-�rliil`� I�„1� ~ ��Ip�►nnnn��riu �� Q InI� ...........Imnnm►qv��it U� �•;•••::::::: .I•.r�Illll IIIII V �1►,� �num1?��►i .I Q II►� Inn1lq IIIlllllni �,IIIIj1� j .I■ �, IIImPi II111111 _ �a�`q� • - ----------- — IOI1111/I --�I�I�I I��I----------------------........... • �:,in■O��:: \.-�'�; �,�IIIIII��i i /VYrL/a 1\1-1111 c�Ir11 1 •■■■■.��••� �110r��In11/,►��Ipll.IIIII►1 IAAl!R`9 .11:►�i.�7�DII Project 1DI11 C:nn►`P �. �\ .Ib�:pp��DII IIIII�:nn■111• IIIn" ■111■_��:..■■■ IIIII��- �� ♦1 IIIII,. :■l■11 i.pp ,IIII Area IIIID i:::iiilll II IIII►�G\OIID\\� � ��nn1■�-�IIII ■I nnnn•1111u n �11 IIIIIII�� -:muu��el:nnnln n11■, IIIIIII Mull 1 111 IIIInIIIIIII IIr►� i1111n►e C1••Ilunnl _�i Analysis IIII�-innnml°0u= � ..IIIII�,. � 1i 1�I II IIIIIII IIIII�=nnnn■n,,,,,_:' IIII��IIIIIII� �� OI\►I • I.:IIIIIIIIIIIIlIlIIlIIl/nl►d j IIa11ImIfall I II�;IIII IImI1II1I1I 1II1I1I11I I I1III1lII1lI1IlI1IlIII1lII1IlII1lI1IlIII1l lI.l-Il pGg_�`uu�•nnnnn„■nnl�nnI•nn�nu�nn_: g■■■■■■■■■��r I�,1'-�I�I.I IOIIIIInIII I\J�• ,I /_I DI- ential ......11 - naln _I,...n..m...m111 ■1111 � rci MCMIL'LAN- 111�\IIIIII11111111u/r da n.4nn.nn. ��.11111 IIr1111�— �� n1= nnnunmm��l�.n-e___•��--. :__J INS IIIIIIIII/f, �� IIh lump m / _: == u i.\pI►1 ��I///Inn mu1�r■, mn „lnun►��, n111un■ �-�_p � W man=_=?'I illlnl lnj�! ■ ►II�ti INm nnnnnnun loom - ��Hoop DD111 - - ►� �nnunn�I oov ru►II j•♦�: lunnnm pmmm unnl� S-�Inml .: m ,_ 1-+ �tongl'RUN �11111 111\�._ IIIOIIIIIII�gloom nnmr/ � 7 Innn �: III 1�� g1111 j11`�IIIIp��11 IIIII � ��/nll nlnllln►�/n a►��L 1 ♦ �1 p I� IIIIIIIIpI C=umu nnnml_ nnl- ♦� .� :III 11 I� IIIII �I p/••`i C IInIII1lIp.=mm�' _�-� ._�nqr IL�Z /DD •♦I ■.IIIID � � I i�i11►11 1 /IIII i � �_ -- ��i//I W � 1 iii♦�•��Ilnl � '��ii= �'r♦1�/�iP�-�li��/ u H ♦al . I - Oinull=__-IIII .L14n nri�o � �w■ • - I • Dens! ugn`T►►1►j�� i Gig► �.m L� �ionl 5'nnln .!�lupp►/I,�►� �,u��_=a1Ap/i � IIIII Residential ► ��: gill Boiling ►i1�l�� ,oR,:-:.IIIIIIII%'`.•;1[,� Iollllll �v� IIII QODIIIIm�lu/y/III� Q s Ron IIIIII I p ADIIIII �►inm II J 1►.1 IIIIIIIIII■ rI IIIIIIII �,� - ------------ n1nIIIII Legend o•� .■: :-�♦ O puunn:�mounll T�In I IIIII:1n.. p•••_ �.:��:.umn nnnmll: (p�mm�•S � m ..■■n•,��• I_��• r/nnl,►�� Pm I��.III O�\oM. a0 p�■■■■■ . .��am�- 11\u► ProjectArea of Impact IIIII�-��`-: I �1�IIp•-'� • -nm-�C�� IIIII�• u■■::�■ i',♦ ��IIIII� D nm:.CO. IIII IIIII.::I mm� " I�1 II II��\IIID, ` ■..:,IIII NEESE 1l■nm ■uIlk I r....... Tf City Limits �.�mun�uuunl aonunun,nul IIII� � � _ _ YIIIIIIdllll ill► Gnu1•hi�� I Planned Parcels =L !!�f�■■N:■*Ial;��I IIIIIIIII I/�' ,��an.T IIIIIIImIII■IIInII,IIIIII.I i I ��non\► IID. • HOOP fill - +=e Illllp� I'" I ' �/��I/IIIIIIIIIII►�I/p Analysis II IIII]JJJ IIIIIII=- � ��IIIIIII J I- ��\n�_�i■ IIIIIII�' ,O _ 111111111�1■1■■��.�, - : �`_n.mm - uuunna un%IIIII►�' � ,■■�„� �' MCM�IL—L—AN �=1„ter„�1 �� IIII'\IIIIIII mnnnunn nnun_ni�nnnnm �� -1 6 - m: nnm ,,,,,,,,,,,,__a,,,,,,,-��1_si►\.IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII �� +I7IUI`�I IIL: noon - mnnnnm== mwiiiiinnid_ _ 1 _ H 1►i t111111111111 p.� ♦ I/�IIG::=--- ` _ r 111111111 11■IIi:�♦. _■a.-___�iglllp,Ipp IIII: , gUIOI,.L.1. 11:■1Ip1j1 ��I.�//inn IIIIIII.ri111 e'1-_=T _ _`_slunuu -?■� •Iu a`�-' n Ij p�'�■IIII\�11��.IIIII IIOOIIIIIIII - 11111111r - ISW1 m111111■0 •I•-111��Ij�► ••IIII.IIII\i,♦� .. .�91111111111111 .IIIII "-l( IIIIIII .-�-III IF ~ /t\IIII r�� q 1 �llinuq � .. � nIIIIII�1/i IIIII t_a■nneui�lrlEAJaa.►ae4.1.1�!/t: Its � 1 ♦ 11 j� ===IIIIIIIIIO p e n11 �%IOIi,�► � QInP� v��i Hill Ilii:C un � nnnlllll.=m1 --- �71 e� DLrZ� ►♦i np/� ��IIIIj�1 I/IIII ip�r n�::-: ��j/I� ,�Cl�.W. 1�►,�IIIg•�J 1 illiiii G•��1111,L~ ,� ��41_ -•- I�i�/i/ � F-- a1 n� � 1� 1 �imnlleG.IlDj�.. •IIrle�ip�i�/ �1-�♦� :� Ilpnq��11j//j� �o Io.�OIII I1 /.IIIII■ IIIII /1 ►►• / --��.�'►7�.� \IIIII 5' IBM GO/per^:iiilnii:II. saw- ill HE 11,1�11 �2 III IIIIr..IIIIIIIII�,q I♦ I mamma,= ■ InI11m�//♦ / IIIII IC-_now-_- Iln �♦.nlonnlb��i�Pr Q-=;_�� m ► AIIIIII IIII ..�1 ♦�.II/II��.p��11I11 V-el/nm, - ♦ jI��,�►►/IIIII�,I�II ype ea r'I p?--non--- � I �/11�►�� I I,� 1 ,'vm.Y==Juuw==_ ` ; �� II►�� T.�:I:►:ai��Ir .I ..-.`V91111111111111F 11111- ,'r�r•♦/♦�i ►/ II=D � I///♦� 1. Gm��J • •� � I\II IIIIIIIIIIM,, � 111►� � n1I`� II` n Donn■M ♦i,� .'■ .,, �e�d��:.:. lmi�\1 -• ,1. 7i I�S,..III1111:�^.,��9�� B. Final Plat(date: 9/3/2025) Legend Final Plat for Notes Baratza Subdivision Phase 2 NN�,aNNN.amNm �,.N � aN�N Located in the North 1/2 of the Nortwest 1/4 of Section 34, NN..N.N..N .„„dn" Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian, �aaam Boa.,, �r City of Meridian,Ada County,Idahozm.��NN. ,maw NNN.,�N,N,..m.NN„•- ^°^°' 2025 =—ITURNEV—BINSUNARPENNO IN seder r=159 AST aS. ,ax„,"n,._,,. ,",,,�,",=", .V. aaa»,u. ASH Curve Table Llne Table US or«ama�,a�N°�i01..w I ! Detail 1.1 Detail 1.2 .oNaNemNNaUUNsN.N:w,aa. N,.BB,N,,,gea.aah ae ., I Survey Narrative �°�_� �-- �-- � �-- � t SUBDIVISION BNAaB, «f�� I N n sm=asNBe- -ors aEA Referenced Surreys I araaei --1-7-7-rf __rl_7-_rf- __ s Oao:°2 °,m.�°s i i — I� o'o o uo�o'o'® 010 om "] _ ....,N. o,oa ®®o®®oo®®®off ro®o®®®o ®® ®®®�„ 8000000 &04 7880 s THE �,a1 -------- -- — -- — — �gma LAND --1e,wma� u� B.PATTEo ::� GROUP I �avm NVEN—R ND, S U.S SUBB IVISION Na., IVIS_X:AS Final Plat for J F________ BAIATZI aBBBIaIBIBN B iABa, Baratza Subdivision Phase 2� m 2025 TrA 'SUBDIVISION PHASE - �- a.- am � muSr.a. N a��B,�a',l,._ � -a � I Ij g lO Zw BLCCK2' 8 ' Sal 8 x BLCd3 np su I OO IIOO co®�eOe® Npa®`�O� '° cA ��S�W��Fa°e��ASpFIOk°s la .I --------------- -=tea=_- - i _ __ _ _�_ ___-=_--_ e I NA,"a� m Al�" — --- r_Lotrror._ ._ r.tvrgllst, ma�NBE e� mNa aa.3 m� mNa aaea �m„a a SII I� _w.__®m._ _mot_ _10LID! 1°d� BOdbBOdb _B0d0__ _--_ _B-_ON° it am eam mot mot mot _m= e maa ------- I .NNu ma NNNN., QUARTET NORTHEAST SUBDIVISION N..I :QUARTET NORTHEAST SUBDIVISION NS.al I SUBDIVISION E, $al ZSm=�,m� �1 31r' a 'i (D RAiTeA BDINIS PHASE j II IO I O II .aOli le : NI 81 = HIMi I �;I,�a. m -.T�°'a- - amamq',,�0 Ik O yI O m IO AT SV ¢I; B3 6I B� I W 1: qq BLCCK4 a0° F pp (a)o (��a)v g sl =Iry Y o U OI gIO�'ON n - aI' IIIE 41 19 SIB .1 UZ \•/ ly 14 $I I See LOON,DO$heet 1.and CO. 31 - it an a II _ �0 r Q kltl a 81 8 p 8 r+snw 18 �I O m ml aM line Tade BenmSheet3 _ CSI a Is 3g �— JC A` _m�-9rs� _fir as aagl 1:��`ql -ar Qplm� NI SUNS asla an —--„ -�r.m „ RAND, �n i I earaaw� ?OII�t III®& ®f!$ __ _t__ ____ _®°a_ _ �_ _®'m_ _�_ _mot_-�h` ,y u I U➢ 19 s° !1¢ t' I` a --- o I THE - ym a.1 � IO�;p O ®�`O®°O 0 =©g=®R&NA � I' I LAND ®iiii OO�T'm-a BLBCI(10 _ _ la ��Po STAN JOUARTST NORTH F AST SUBDIVISION'wa.2« HBPSStOW SOeaSa T x R1 VINIUN o. - -----�. NNUAV City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits Final Plat for Baratza Subdivision Phase 2 2025 Cum Table Curve Table Curve Table CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CH RDBEARING CHORD LENGTH CLINE UENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH CUNE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORDBEAMNG CHORDLENGTH 31V Line Table LAND 7HE-a Final Plat for Baratza Subdivision Phase 2 2025 Certificate of Owners T Rcknowle M A I'l-1 111 T I I I T.A 4,1, =1=1=TT.11.111y,I dgme Certificate Of SUMOYOF IE 78 8& 9 LV HE IAND GROUP City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits Final Plat for Baratza Subdivision Phase 2 2025 Mproral of Cenhal District Health Certificate of County Surveyor Rpproral of Ada County XlghwaY Rlstriet Certificate of the County Treawrer Rpproral of Ciry Engineer County Recorders Certificate gpproral of CXy Connell �.Mrs.oEem.m.arar,�.Wo�mramauam..o.m�..,ouw.m�v<mwm„r, eu„� � LAND �GROUP City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits C. Preliminary Plat(date: 5/17/2024) Baratza Subdivision oa ZCC2 ..Nci= Preliminary Plat �.--j f-Ij AD LI ---- ----------------------- .......... ........... --------------- ............ 7 III,Line,in. PP-01 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits A Landscape Plan(date: 9/2/2025) ckmllew W. waP.n aXXXa: n.�,a.arWc Le I I, I I I � ' I PNw2PnlaaLealedatiain wrvxermve d J •�/, �� '- M1ne PralecXon XOM1e•m.••}•�Bw�w.F .� So 1 m N wL' n.wm d - I a I ' uvw,uono,a.,.eonww�a.mn u.,wan, Q= i Ir F 81 Q R C / I Vna cope Plnn =c Landscape Plan-Overview �•- L1.00 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 11/19/2024) c APPROVED I Open Space Legend: Open Space Calculations:—M.—fl THE QWLIFIED OPEN SPACE OUAIIFI EC OPEN SPACE- ��. R-15 RA LAND ARTERIALLANDSCAPE BORER TOTPLAREA 15.06 AC 65MAC 5D%OF TOTAL ARM REQUIRED OPEN SPACE.w 2.26 AC D5%) 9.70 AC(15%) 2MIM OROUP TOTAL REQUIRED OPEN SPACE. 12.D4 AC Ill Ill/ PARKWAYS)QUALIFIED IRRIGATION EASEMENT `\\\4,,AE W 4yb2i� 4 OPEN SPACE) A F AR CNLLNDED IN BORER QUALIFIED T2 LIFIED OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 1].B3 AC I .2%I AR IATNINS) r rrrrrrn iTr r1 I 31129r2029 —— — — � — — — �— ��------- -- — --J u_ - - - -j 1 I_______________7 � 1--_-- --_------`I III Ir------ --- 1 I _ 41 ----____----- ui -= R'y-a M N C Aa= a I - - •I _ d i M .. a m J TTLIs ��NRM F R II1N v Open Space BMW DD 2� Qpen Seca E bft NnNS NA 1.=25D EX-03 a58 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits F. Building Elevations(date: 11/19/2024) ww ry. ww w" .......... IL Housing Type Exhibit 0 500, low DII rizantal Scale: 1. 0 UO Ir I 45-FT WIDE LOTS City of Meridian Department Report V1. Exhibits 2� 40 FT WIDE LOTS EE EM 2025 FARMHOUSE 1577 TRADITIONAL 1870 CRAFTSMAN 2025 TRADITIONAL 1870 FARMHOUSE 31 60-FT WIDE LOTS o a 2542 CRAFTSMAN 2801 TRADITIONAL 2801 CRAFTSMAN 2542 FARMHOUSE 1910 FARMHOUSE City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits G. Emergency Access Exhibit(date: 11/19/2024) F"T'D F1 T-1-77-T-1 177=111 i I I i lu" I f 7-7 4& AgouWlklt City of Meridian Department Report V1. Exhibits E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Mondt Meadows Subdivision (FP-2025-0026) by Gregg Davis, Breckon Land Design, located at 6101 and 6152 S. Tarrega Ln. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2025 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 10 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0026 LOTS AND 6 COMMON LOTS ON ) 7.91 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-2 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL AND R-4 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION ) BY: GREGG DAVIS, BRECKON ) LAND DESIGN ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on December 9, 2025 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE SE '/2 OF THE SW '/4 SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 3N, RANGE IE, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2025, HANDWRITTEN DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 2025, by NATHAN J. DANG, PLS, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION—FP-2025-0026) Page 1 of 3 SHEET 1 OF 4,"is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated December 9, 2025, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A"by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION—FP-2025-0026) Page 2 of 3 interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 16th day of December , 2025. By: Robert E. Simison 12-16-2025 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson C 12-16-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated:12-16-2025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION—FP-2025-0026) Page 3 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WE PI DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 12/9/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council -: Area of Impact = City Limits — 1� FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 lritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Gregg Davis,Breckon Land Design SUBJECT: FP-2025-0026 Mondt Meadows Subdivision-FP ' LOCATION: 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Lane, located in the SE '/4 of the SW '/4 of Section 31, T.3N,R.IE,Parcels S1131346650 and i S1131346605 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The Final Plat for Mondt Meadows Subdivision includes ten(10)building lots(nine [9] new and one [1] existing) and six(6)common lots on approximately 7.91 acres of land within the R-2 and R-4 zoning districts. The applicant has revised the preliminary plat to eliminate one previously proposed buildable lot, converting it into a common lot to accommodate an irrigation pond. B. Issues/Waivers None C. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. D. Decision Approved with conditions City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview 11. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1•Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Uses) Residential - Existing Zoning -p R-2 and R-4 VI.A.2 Proposed Zoning R-2 and R-4 Adopted FLUM Designation Low Density Residential VLA.3 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Mondt Meadows Subdivision FP-2025-0026 (copy this link into a separate browser). City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2024-0067)as required by UDC 11-613-3C.2. The submitted final plat is for construction of the approved preliminary plat;therefore,the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. The applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval for this development H- 2024-0067 (AZ, CPAM,PP); DA Inst.No.2025-041186. 2. No building permits shall be issued prior to the plat being recorded. 3. The final plat shown in Section V.B,prepared by Accurate Surveying&Mapping, stamped on 10/21/2025 by Nathan J.Dang,PLS, shall be revised prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer,as follows: a. Note#14: Include the instrument number for the water and sewer easements. b. Add the recorded instrument number for any ACHD permanent easements. c. Add the recorded instrument number for any ACHD license agreements. d. Add the recorded instrument number any City of Meridian sewer and water easements. e. The 30-foot easement on the north property boundary shall be vacated prior to the City Engineer's signature and the depiction of the easement removed from the plat, including the deletion of note 16 on sheet 2 of 4. 4. The landscape plan prepared by Jon Breckon stamped on 9/17/2025, is approved. 5. The Open Space amenities as shown in Exhibit VI.G shall meet the following requirements: the picnic area shall include tables,benches,landscaping, and a structure for shade; and the outdoor fire ring shall meet fire safety standards, is located on a noncombustible surface and includes fixed seating. 6. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures that face Sublimity Avenue shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single- story structures are exempt from this requirement. 7. The property owners of parcel(s) S 1131346650 and S 1131346605 shall relinquish their rights to access and utilize the private road Tarrega Lane. Written documentation shall be submitted prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat. 8. The existing homes shall connect to City water and sewer service within 60 days of it becoming available and disconnect from private service, as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. This includes the home located at 6101 S. Tarrega Lane. 9. The single-family structure on parcel S 1131346605 located at 6162 Tarrega Lane can remain in its current location once the following easements have been relinquished: o There is a thirty(30)foot wide access easement(Instrument No. 7520424&2021- 049475),that runs across the north boundary of both parcels in the project,as well as the west thirty(30)feet of each parcel. These easements are no longer required and will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis o The existing thirty(30)foot wide access easement, (Instrument No. 9037915),which runs across the east 302.15' of the south boundary of parcel S 1131346650 will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat due to the public road improvements in the same location. Written documentation to relinquish the easements listed above shall be submitted prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat. 10. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 11. The private streets are approved subject to completion of the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3 within one year. Documentation of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division in order to receive final approval. 12. The private streets within the development shall be 26-feet wide and constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4B.2. 13. The Applicant shall install no parking signs along the private street. 14. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 1I- 3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 15. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. 16. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the date of approval of the preliminary plat(i.e. May 13,2025), in accord with UDC 11- 613-7, in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. 17. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of ACHD. 18. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. B. Meridian Public Works SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. The bottom of structural footing shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation. 2. Maintenance of any irrigation and/or drainage pipes or ditches crossing a lot is the responsibility of the lot owner unless such responsibility is assumed by an irrigation/drainage entity or lot owner's association. 3. A gate is allowed to cross a City utility easement but it must be wide enough to allow the City to have access to the full width of the easement.No post are allowed in the easement. City must have ability to open gate at all time. Provide note stating how the City is to have access on the Utility Plan. 4. Shafer View Ridge shows PI system in conflict with the hydrant location.PI system must be at least 10'from the hydrant and hydrant lateral. 5. Sewer main in Mont Meadows must end with a manhole. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-313-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing,landscaping,amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD.The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x I I" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR). The Developer, Owner, or project Engineer, shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so, how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment.If wells are to be abandoned,the project owner or their representative must contact the IDWR Groundwater Protection Section(Aaron Skinner, Hydrogeologist 208-287-4972) BEFORE any work is done to decommission an existing well (even if it is believed that the well is less than 18 ft deep).Proof of communication with IDWR must be submitted to the City prior to any work being done to decommission the well. Failure to communicate with IDWR may result in additional work and expense to decommission the well. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6.). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. C. Irrigation Districts 1. Boise Kuna Irrigation District https:llweblink.meridiancioy.or lWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=423010&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCi V. ACTION A. Staff: Approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. B. City Council: Approval City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action ' 1 r ctLocation . of Impact nn mnAnalysis nr�l • .W s �, 5 LAKE HAZEL �'" '" y'�= n.ul��e� Legend Project Location Area of Impact %.non moor ME Analysis Lu2plipp— ON 1-M son I aunnn ■■�■� � . 4i, I �nn■i��111��nIp � � 11►��lir� , �i 1��i .mm�■m:- w mi= � �•11 11111'rwi r°xuu�� ■ � v.e IrI/rrp�Ir- L-AKE HAZEL u.., = noel ineen e uppO \ :non�nnn� •ear� �� ProjectAreQ • D - Fi e of Impact 0 Analysis MIN � II Illllllj� �'' ,IIIII� e - e = ■-,�Illr��a See-- I►j� -E - ,11 l� ■ � (IIIIIIII 161MM—)M - o - o �� ul- 111�iUiii�iquiil Legend Project Location Area of Impact ■ I L-AKE HAZEL m//♦jI p♦i�i liip,�p�� _nnm innn� a� r��'■ ►,non moor 11�� 1:71:71"11:71aR:1::13�:�llllln 11111111� � �: liar-III =IIIIII(IIIIIII 1ui7 QIIII•'- d �r __IIIIII�IIIIIIIII=�-� _ I �� _■ .�..•.,►•._� City Limits Planned Parcels = uu I- r luuulllllllllilll _ nnnnnm__n�,��Vj�� Oj�II, �■.,. �I,``/�1��I��1 0 =uwmlllllui nn -nuuuuw__�p I� I ♦ ,. =_lunnnnr nn � ., =�n1n111 Ilo►_►��`�O�.�� _J 1��a��) non I mnq i•IIIID111 BOOM = I- III�II��r1 ��•`��OHO /i,\� ��. \I■r ® Its�.�� III--___= IIIIIII-IIIIII�I1r ,�I,I/1111'� !�.■��,r •r,:acar:a::ac:n,:m;: uwmm �1 y��s;:bl��omnq� -- ■ I==SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'c'�_ =imm� '- � ,111111111111.��7O CC III I �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_ =IIIIIIII -�-,� - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iiiipl— Ilnl-SOME =uuiuui mnnm -r7 !11 ,,,,■==nu '1:Il�it_J="III/n==�mmnmmn' mm�nll0 ■ N11111 /niiill' Io1 "MIN, — e. r ulni Ill((nmi ..'=9 ■ `I clllllllllll��-��--II Illlnl � r •••�iiiiiii•� IYI IlumnnomnnmmiGl-- nnnn�nul�un m■��, � ._`� LAKE-HAZEL - m/qjI all ------- ---- I ' 1 _ -- - -`IIIII--IIIIP� ' (III LIIIIII 11111� I�1/1�0� '? 111 =IIIIIII IIIIII. `► � �:u_3-__ -IIIIII==IIIIli= nuum=_ �� Mary n11111101 7uum wunul B. Subject Site Photos o tl v I ✓i— City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits �I ��6CCI I- Et City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits Y E -:t i'a n: 1��;I rt' +F it�s '..�. I� _�..3 r r.�- .. 5. -, iR _ _� - -:- _. :_E'er':-. � � � "_� I .. ��e t l.. i :.r m Y I`h I am •r 4 - � �`f +F�'S.F 9n6� ,�.�.c-�� 't, .�i"�i�Z� ..t+sZ 77q°1ar Z ,i r•1'� i I I. 5 rs�� •� a.:p ' �• _ ..gym 11 ,. i v�i o fi a r, . -- a 2 �� t _ � .Y" •`Y jr��.'. r"F,ti}yew �� *.. i e: DepartmentCity of Meridian po WRIPIN ' AF 'Jn{ 'r y ~. 0.. �9�1 ti r ' h • . _ mil- _.. „ �_ - � �� -i '� i' -��-. , �5� ry .�- i�i ^' '�.'`f'fs.�+•.��4��r1�.t�2ry'�.o-r City of Meridian Department Report C. Preliminary Plat(date: 4/7/2025) A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR °d MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE SE1/4 OF THE SM4 OF SECTION 31. T.3 N,R 1 E,ELM,CITY OF MERIDIAN ADA COUNTY,IDAHO SRE INFORMATION 2025 xs.sna,aneaoas„a,a.esw o - .� VICINITY MAPjI€f asp uaFo:x. _ SHEE LIST TABLE ass:sn.,c n< - PRE-PLAT LEGEND PPW PRELIMINARY PLAT cr e.mosc sr,e.unsxix soixrs Px�ovio�so..zi ______ PP2.0 UTILITY PLAN a cnxsn xsouixsmsxTs: _______ �� ix ms axsn rvsv xs xznu. r,eunsxix i uinixuw,nrsae,zooxs '�`•"' „e.,,,., PPW OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN PP3.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA ONE ry ac.,.wx roE.ncxFn oxaoo srnnncx.o ._.� ,...e PP32 LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA TWO WU LANDSCAPE DETAILS x +�X bwa RIs== i' CALLOUT LEGEND EX11 AMENITY EXHIBIT wES Sinslzssowu �� 0+ EX12 OPEN SPACE EXHIBR Ens.Ix3l.on owac O ,�,,,® b d O0 w A >Z N �neM , , Pox x nxxAx�xxx ' — r�nQQa - -- M--.-- ii - ; J —- - x.wow•o Lu❑ a g ----; --=--- cd�ZdI _________________ NW -___________________-_ --------'-5 ----- ; ; „ „ J _ , g ________----______ i ems% , a — l 3 ° ° -- ------------- PRELIMINARY PLAT I I I g n o PPLo City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits A Final Plat(date: 11/13/2025) MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION c r/+-TMF sw ii x�Fgsr�nw+1r�.T r. CITY OF MERIDIAN—CWNW OF ADA—STATE OFEIDANO ® sNgrcw view csrq res —cx r '0' 2025 0 ❑. sR xuw ra 5 e951'JJ'E Io0a.B8' mr.uo-i°m�°ssn` w urca L M rusr xau F � \.+ m w�m r-sv°'ar II -novas w-�88 � ar \`r� rxs usnaxr(m.) y� Q w— A � i m x Q �g L_L_«main•.--—�/ • � '—nwvea�x�u.-—_x � a t£CENO — A mqn a am° ® ----- J w L—xa. —�J r...w.e sa:aarrrA.) rx.. or�a>• ��,6rz:� x o s —c cscunmw ae: —�\y' ffi yl rr O nan Ea4,rmr nax N ea'av5s•w.Ns.wo' �� N en5aa•w.me.er a -�`" aw. n ..0 N 159s'4T•w S MS OF BEARING s..r9• _ LINE TABLE WR4E TABLE aww' Xx SURWE S NARRAnY y;we Nr- REfFRENCESa - oa. ors rraer°'. 1�F9$ wz�wscaw ar suwsrr ve rsaos �r N.r-urm ms.xe msr-wears VETIN(IM S IN NOTE:su z. Atlass� »«w_.sxere.,Veywsm,x MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION NOTES me xmrowry cnr mrvnvs r W(om�C�wo iE ( rroo _ _ s( 5) m m xN. ucvr uscarcvr orcen as _ w�nr/c�ouxxn�vrcxi��s�vsAmsc m°s(s)— wanaa. rorva �(s).s' avo ram)ma r mr cm��irc crwru[rrz swws rnr A- MIMI s ui('r�Eua� m a a c+mry asssssuayss �i�.� DlgXally slgnM �°� '093J:3J-0J'00 ZaMxAw'P ',l lt1 F�TIN �e°e+ur �iw1ld wwwr„*n=.�wx City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CERRFlCA7E OF OWNERS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT _ cauxrrawow}ss rouxry orb}ss ZT- fflI a,ya wsr mw M swwp ns r�ru ar Flnsi.aorr wrvr% r axo '—1x Z cssnnoaa Z40 Aaotc xterrz'x, r axo rrwa ai rms cunsrraa n rarroa mw�mxa n�ro,Iwo ymmsa+o ev.' wr ccwsrrssav s A. 11 wr cowulsvwv A. rrrc star[ca rwra arrroa.a..o�.+nro;rw�w°>«`"""`.:;ou n'W�.r•mnrE„ .w wn,.n.:a�,..enm n:.m tar roa ar nm..w„w.•.s,.m r CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR mxmrvc uc co v[w atwro coot w-r.u.. s aoxro ev ne p°tfa pat�eanwm� Btxv xFn£B✓ ry r�rorr+ewwiacE w.rEa rpe�w µo m 5 e me mreim M� °I lent a r oar tw cowawxc[wrx srcrox Jr-Jsas,ro.xa[nor, rrrcr �owc ss 160rlremwM ss-I6�2PotwtMe� DigMlysigned byNa thanl .+ swwv wen',wawaa Dart �s2025.11.i3 Y�.� 08��37:339A9-07'00 1� EYINti tom., roesx §snp »»,r. rev„twrswn. MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CERRF"C OF 4VA COUNTY SURVEYOR CERRFW—OF CENTRAL 05O CT HEAL, CERi1FTCATE CF THE CdFNTY TREASURER - _- _ _- �X,y w me.asxnac w uaiTmirnic w •s.+w mn++r arxT mom fm:wn p.-r. _ ADA L NI]'HlC "Y OASTRICT APP-14 RECCROERS CERTIFICATE COMMISSMER5 ACCEPTANCE APPROVAL OF CYTY CO N OL Digitally vg.d by NathanA'��" fang 4WZ mj=llAS 4� ' �-�W::3pp7d9 9�-0700 •ham„y+s.'� +.t TEr /�44VIV'1��I sssYErlts s taYalu City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits E. Landscape Plan(date: 9/17/2025) LANDSCAPE NOTES TREE PROTECTION NOTES LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ems.o ® 5 _ .. �... ,.. . II - I \ � .wxnxe. .u.rsx.uamcssxm�na _ 1 PROJECT INFORMATION Z y O' O W c r aa"O U Cal-U W OW O w rn OQaQ P O 0 1 CS) e i < aJ �Wir Nwa E z w +,p Ll ,. om ZOO O D ruw �F ■Cep snp■ >. c _ uL.,. IIP 2\3 6 �v � 7� F 1'J a¢ I LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 TURF AREA PREPARATION NOTES LANDSCAPE LEGEND - ..,A.�� lCl1 ® �EaFi 1°��e i LANDSCAPE AREA PREPARATION NOTES: CALLOUT LEGEND EXISTING TREE INVENTORY ■ ! TREE MITIGATION NOTES 74 O ' PLANT SCHEDULE a V w l ------------- I YMBO� OJDE 0'IY BOTMICeLNaeE COMwnNPM[ SIZE REMMRR m FER TREES <m a I e _ _ Ir' oEclouous�wRE ® co Q a e n ».� 10 w m Lu Cl)g - LAU 0 w K RE11ErN is — a. ON DRIVE S w w " L CAPE PLAN-AREA ONE �. City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits TOPSOIL NOTES WEED ABATEMENT LANDSCAPE LEGEND NOTES Pull Wm M EM . ., A..» ffre.o CALLOUT LEGEND OHE RKMaWm Nri . PLANT SCHEDULE CO ^-qt z BOL COOS Ott BOTPNIC"L NMAE COMMON NNME 82E REMMKB (n<W � C,to P1111 w irZa_ nra,a eNwE Txe� F Q o a wN¢ Etter CS) II IF .. ..«< e �NwU II II R F<D do �• , m R IIII I ❑Tp II II Z II Z Q cc 3 ••u• •••n�•,• ••: � .�' •^ � ORNMIBR":L IREB , -- ? rIS ON DRN -- Y E-BiNN AORWJ.ENIPL OR"eBBB — 1 r 18N FER u T uz IRRIGATION NOTES: _ .:- -�s�� PLANTER 8ED CUT EDGE W - Ina¢unrrn¢s ru Toro u�nsl Y Af x� ffn<�i � ewe i o x I6�'"�:•u,,,,„ 3�CON'IFEROUS TREE PLANTING OQ�F co w nee Cc LU QQ¢_¢ CBE STEEL FENCE W Rh �� (�DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING�— y ��,.� 4E PERENNIAL�R�NDCOVER t bdx » ,�� PLANTIN 1e E esevanon SHRUB PLANTING T SC�EDAR FENCE City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits DRYLAND SEEDING REQUIREMENTS ^0PEN V SAION WROUGHT IRON DOUBLE SWING GATE ® w.ew ueumiwwmi� 2 ccw o z CO m w O c y 00Qzwa I ¢~a0a a� 9 L1.6 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 8/8/2025) CITY OF MERIDIAN SINGLE FAMILY (R-2 AND R-4) OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE F.-M 94E GFM 9FAGt m_ rY_loYl_ EgaziaQ� 1 SW1 271.�5r m ap ST fAz&V 21M 5F f20 AO XUALIFIED 6FEK 5PAM f•5L29 Mj 6% M F1-4.12k 441M 5F G8 IQLM►RE.a. 952aN52L 'i1.-1G9 9R 414 A-) F 5wFRLv IFF T47 5F LP904 5F(.92 Aa 24% LANDSCAPE LEGEND ZVEN 5F ArZ AREA. 112.681 a,o.r- 1 itRC?s AREA 1'.•.311 rT f 4.-92 40 r- AP.EA•fAa92 Sa.'FT. AREA-29.615 50.FT. Cd E. ALATI RIVE n 1'=150'-0" O [ SUBDIVISION [� 41 MONaT I�EADV�+] t7UBLJIVIJIOIY PROECT#�'$2dO5d S. TARREGA LANE, MERIDIAN OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT EX1.2 Lj City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits G. Amenities Exhibit 7.1 r1PERGOLA AMENITY AFIRE PIT AMENITY rn1TABLE AMENITY l 11 jss=s% w Z N ;77- ' Prr z z E ,, BENCH AMENITY Lu N�g Q CALLOVT LEGEND Z m e f.►»' O m s n_ AMENITYREQUIREMENTS NIT- -' wEw�o n AMENITY AREA ENLARGEMENT ® EXi1 Ir City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits H. Building Elevations(date: 12/13/2024) W ..� AK l i 1 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits 1 I� City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits l {M �iX �� a� •I�k � City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits i of ^ City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Center Permanent Sidewalk Easement Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-084355 Boise,Idaho Pgs=8 vbailey 12/18/2025 10:33:13 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded COM25-0090 Meridian Community Center Please re-record to fix error on 1 st page correcting the document to "December" T4N, R1W, Sec 36 PERMANENT EASEMENT THIS PERMANENT EASEMENT (the "Easement"), is made and entered into this —1 6th day Pf December 2025, by and between the City of Meridian, a Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR" and ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "ACHD." WITNESSETH: FOR GOOD AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION, IT IS AGREED: SECTION 1. Recitals. 1.1 GRANTOR owns the real property located in Ada County, Idaho more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (hereinafter "Servient Estate"). 1.2 ACHD has jurisdiction over the public highways, including sidewalks, and public rights-of-way which adjoin and are adjacent to the Servient Estate (hereinafter the "Dominant Estate"). 1.3 ACHD desires to obtain an easement on, over and across the Servient Estate for the purposes hereinafter described, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, GRANTOR is willing to grant such easement to ACHD. Permanent Easement - 1 Instrument # 2025-084355 12/18/2025 10:33:13 AM Page 2 of 8 Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-083862 Boise,Idaho Pgs=7 vbailey 12/17/2025 09:22:32 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded COM25-0090 Meridian Community Center T4N, R1W, Sec 36 Please re-record to fix error on 1st page correcting the document to "December" (space reserved for recording) PERMANENT EASEMENT THIS PERMANENT EASEMENT (the "Easement"), is made and entered into this 16th day of -Vlefkfi-aiH- December , 2025, by and between the City of Meridian, a Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR," and ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "ACHD." WITNESSETH: FOR GOOD AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION, IT IS AGREED: SECTION 1. Recitals. 1.1 GRANTOR owns the real property located in Ada County, Idaho more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (hereinafter "Servient Estate"). 1.2 ACHD has jurisdiction over the public highways, including sidewalks, and public rights-of-way which adjoin and are adjacent to the Servient Estate (hereinafter the "Dominant Estate"). 1.3 ACHD desires to obtain an easement on, over and across the Servient Estate for the purposes hereinafter described, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, GRANTOR is willing to grant such easement to ACHD. Permanent Easement - 1 Instrument # 2025-083862 12/13/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 2 of 8 SECTION 2. Grant of Easement and Authorized Uses. GRANTOR hereby grants to ACHD a permanent exclusive easement over and across the Servient Estate for use by the public, including motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists, and the following uses and purposes: (a) placement of a Public Rights-of-Way as (as defined in Idaho Code, section 40- 117); (b) construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance and placement of a Highway (as defined in Idaho Code, section 40-109) and any other facilities or structures incidental to the preservation or improvement of the Highway; (c) statutory rights of ACHD, utilities and irrigation districts to use the Highway and/or Public Right-of-Way. SECTION 3. Permanent Easement: Covenants Run with the Land. This is a permanent easement. This Easement, and the covenants shall be a burden upon the Servient Estate and shall run with the land. The Easement and the covenants and agreements made herein shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon, ACHD and GRANTOR, and Grantor's successors and assigns to the Servient Estate. SECTION 4. Appurtenant. The Easement herein granted is appurtenant to the Dominant Estate and a burden on the Servient Estate. SECTION 5. Maintenance. Upon acceptance of the Highway, ACHD shall maintain the physical integrity of this easement in good condition and repair and as required to satisfy all requirements of applicable laws, the policies of ACHD and sound engineering practices. The repair and maintenance of the physical integrity of the Easement shall be at the sole cost and expense of ACHD; provided if the damage to the physical integrity of the Easement is as a result of the activities of GRANTOR, GRANTOR'S guests, invitees, contractors or agents, the repair shall be at the sole cost and expense of GRANTOR. This Section shall not release GRANTOR'S obligation to provide routine maintenance required under any applicable state or local law, ordinance or regulation as to the pedestrian facilities that may be placed on the Servient Estate. Permanent Easement - 2 Instrument # 2025-083862 12/13/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 3 of 3 SECTION 6. Indemnification. ACHD shall, subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, indemnify, save harmless and defend regardless of outcome GRANTOR from expenses of and against suits, actions, claims or losses of every kind, nature and description, including costs, expenses and attorney fees caused by or arising out of any negligent acts by the ACHD or the ACHD's officers, agents and employees while acting within the course and scope of their employment, which arise from or which are in any way out of ACHD's construction, use and maintenance on the Servient Estate. Any such indemnification hereunder by the ACHD is subject to the limitations of the Idaho Tort Claims Act (currently codified at chapter 9, title 6, Idaho Code). Such indemnification hereunder by the ACHD shall in no event cause the liability of the ACHD for any such negligent act to exceed the amount of loss, damages, or expenses of attorney fees attributable to such negligent act, and shall not apply to loss, damages, expenses, or attorney fees attributable to the negligence of GRANTOR. SECTION 7. Recordation. This Easement shall be recorded in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. Permanent Easement - 3 Instrument # 2025-083862 12/13/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 5 of 3 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD this Easement unto the ACHD forever. GRANTOR covenants to ACHD that ACHD shall enjoy the quiet and peaceful possession of the Servient Estate; and, GRANTOR warrants to ACHD that GRANTOR is lawfully seized and possessed of the Servient Estate and has the right and authority to grant this Easement to ACHD. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Easement to be executed the day, month and year first set forth above. Grantor: Cit Meridia By: Robert E. S n 12-16-2025 Its: Mayor ATTEST � SF,AL By: Chris Johriison 12 = 025 Its: City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on December 16, 2025 by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson know to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Meridian. Na&ycWait Signature of notary pub ; CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 3-28-2028 STATE OF IDAHO Permanent Easement - 4 Instrument # 2025-083862 12/13/2025 09:22:32 AM Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit "A". Legal description of Servient Estate. The Ada County Highway District(ACHD) is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related regulations and directives. ACHD assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, gender, disability or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any ACHD service, program or activity. Permanent Easement - 5 Instrument # 2025-083862 12/13/2025 09:22:32 AM Page IN of 19 EM-1051T A Legal Description Ada County Highway District Permanent Easement Lot 11 in Block 25 of Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 3 An easement being over a portion of Lot 11, Block 25 of Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 3 as shown in Book 88 of Plats on Pages 10198 through 10201, records of Ada County, Idaho, being located in the SE 1/4of Section 36, Township 4 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT Being 12.00 feet in width, right of and adjacent to the following described easement line: Commencing at Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of the SE % (South 1/4 corner) of said Section 36, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southeast corner of said SE % bears S 89'19'39" W a distance of 2662.39 feet; Thence along the westerly boundary of said SE 1/4 N Oc27'43" E a distance of 532.97 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly boundary S 89032'17" E a distance of 29.00 feet to a point along the easterly right-of-way of Venable Avenue and the BEGINNING POINT of said easement line; Thence N 0'27'43" E a distance of 824.46 feet to the ENDING POINT of said easement line. Said easement contains 9,893 square feet (0.227 acres) and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS Pt_ L A/Vo Land Solutions, PC 13 CO \ \STE October 30, 2025 10 OF �O/v W Sidewalk Easements La Cedar Springs No.3 ACHD Sidew'ndSolutions Job No.24-45 Q_�� Land sv�eying and ConsUlling Page 1 of 1 Instrument N 2025-083862 t # 2025484156"" EXHIBMAT33:13 AM Page 8 of 8 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT PERMANENT EASEMENT LOT 11 IN BLOCK 25 OF CEDAR SPRINGS SUBDIVISION NO. 3 LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TAN., R.1W., B.M., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO PLS 4431 CEDAR SPRINGS L13DIVISI'ON NO. Y 521 C� :D p7- U I 1 I ( �—1 2' W. ASHBY DR. Lil EASEMENT APPLE PINE ST. AREA=9,893 S.F. CICN 00 _ rl¢ ( U') 11 4w PARCEL R1333190940 cry LINE TABLE C) zcz) -OT 1', BLOCK 25 I pn d. CEDAR SPRINGS LENGTH LINE LEN BEARING SUBDWISION NO. 3 Ll 29 S89'32'1 7"E in I i � �,�,LA do s BEGINNING POINT 0 CEDAR SPR;NGS SUBDIVISION No. 6 -Z 04 0 F ON W. 36 CP&F INST. NO. 3631 1 19 —W BEARING) V 1 (BASIS 2017-120066 --�ECTICN LINE S89' 'i�7E 27k2 39' 1/4 W. US11CK ROAD CP&F INST. NO. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 2017-124191 Lan lutions o 00 200 400 Land Surveying and Consulting f 1 ' ' ' 231 E.5TH ST.STE.A MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax k"Vw landsOlufiOnS biz jC5 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Center Temporary License Agreement for Work in The Right of Way Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian LAC2025-0060 Meridian Community Center/ COM25-0090 T4N, R1 W, Sec 36 INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 16th day of December, 2025, by and between the City of Meridian, a Municipal Corporation ("Licensee") and the ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the state of Idaho, ("ACHD"). WITNESSETH : For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties: SECTION 1. RECITALS. 1.1 Licensee is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Idaho, with power to exercise all powers and perform all functions of local self-government in city affairs as are not specifically prohibited by or in conflict with the general laws or constitution of the State of Idaho. 1.2 ACHD owns and has exclusive jurisdiction over the public right-of-way located in Ada County, Idaho, municipally described as N Venable Ave, more particularly described and/or depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Right-of-Way"). 1.3 Idaho Code § 67-2332 expressly authorizes the Licensee and ACHD to enter into agreements to perform any governmental service activity, or undertaking that is authorized by law and within the power, privilege or authority of said agencies. 1.3 Licensee desires a license to use the Right-of-Way for the limited purposes hereinafter set forth, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, ACHD is willing to extend such license to Licensee. TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 1 SECTION 2. LICENSE; LICENSE NOT EXCLUSIVE. 2.1 On the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, ACHD hereby extends to Licensee a license on, over, across and under the Right-of-Way for the following uses and purposes ("Authorized Use") and no others: Licensee is to construct, install and maintain features consisting of grass, trees perennials, and landscape irrigation system per Exhibit C and the ACHD approved civil drawings located within ACHD right-of-way along N Venable Ave and within ACHD Permanent Easement Recorded on as instrument No. • All street signs and hardware must comply with MUTCD standards. Custom finishes (i.e. powder coated signposts, vinyl on the backs of regulatory signs, etc.) MUST be reviewed and approved by ACHD. • In general, coniferous trees are prohibited within the right-of-way. If allowed, the tree or shrub must be less than 3'in height at maturity. • Final grading of landscaped areas shall slope away from right-of-way "hardscape" improvements including the edge of pavement, curbing and sidewalks. • In general, licensee to install landscaping and sprinklers in a manner to eliminate irrigation flows and/or ponding of irrigation water within the ACHD Right of Way. • Any perennial trees or plants that will extend roots deeper than 18 inches shall be prohibited over ACHD underground seepage beds, infiltration facilities or piping systems. • Trees shall not be permitted within the 10', as measured from the outside perimeter, of any storm drain pipe, structures and facilities. • Infiltration areas shall not be covered with sod or non-free draining materials/soil. • Access to inlets and outlets of ACHD Drainage Areas shall not be planted with trees, shrubs or any landscaping that would impede heavy equipment vehicle access. • Licensee shall observe the 40-foot sight triangle and will not plant any shrubs or trees within the area or over any utility lines. • All trees in the public right-of-way shall be maintained by Licensee for clearance of 14 feet over all roadways as measured at the gutter plate, and 8 feet over all sidewalks. • Licensee to contact Digline Inc., prior to start of construction. • Licensee to contact Construction Services at 387-6280 to verify if a construction permit is required. TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 2 2.2 This Agreement does not extend to Licensee the right to use the Right-of-Way to the exclusion of ACHD for any use within its jurisdiction, authority and discretion or of others to the extent authorized by law to use public right-of-way. If the Right-of-Way has been opened as a public Highway (as used in the Agreement the term "Highway" is as defined in Idaho Code § 40-109(5)) Licensee's Authorized Use is subject to the rights of the public to use the Right-of- Way for Highway purposes. Licensee's Authorized Use is also subject to the rights of holders of easements of record or obvious on inspection of the Right-of-Way and statutory rights of utilities to use the public right-of-way. This Agreement it is not intended to, and shall not, preclude or impede the ability of ACHD to enter into other similar agreements in the future allowing third parties to also use its public rights-of-way, or the ability of ACHD to redesign, reconstruct, relocate, maintain and improve its public rights-of-way and Highways as authorized by law and as it determines, in its sole discretion, is appropriate. SECTION 3. CONSTRUCTION, OR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. Any repairs or maintenance, of the Licensee's improvements currently located in the Right-of-Way or the installation or construction of improvements by Licensee in the Right-of-Way as permitted by the Authorized Use, (the "Improvements"), shall be accomplished in accordance with designs, plans and specifications approved in advance and in writing by ACHD as required to satisfy applicable laws, its policies and good engineering practices. In approving such plans and specifications, ACHD assumes no responsibility for any deficiencies or inadequacies in the design or construction of the Improvements, and the responsibility therefor shall be and remain in Licensee. SECTION 4. WAIVER AND ESTOPPEL STATEMENT BY LICENSEE. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the license granted herein is temporary, and merely a permissive use of the Right-of-Way pursuant to this Agreement. Licensee further acknowledges and agrees that it specifically assumes the risk that the license pursuant to this Agreement may be terminated before Licensee has realized the economic benefit of the cost of installing, constructing, repairing, or maintaining the Improvements, and Licensee hereby waives and estoppels itself from asserting any claim that the license is in any way irrevocable because Licensee has expended funds on the Improvements and the Agreement has not been in effect for a period sufficient for Licensee to realize the economic benefit from such expenditures. SECTION 5. TERM. 5.1 The term of this Agreement will commence on the day of 2025, and will continue until terminated by either party, with or without cause, which termination shall be effective following THIRTY (30) DAYS advance written notice of termination given to the other party. Upon expiration of the THIRTY DAYS, ACHD shall record a Revocation of License Agreement in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. 5.2 If Licensee defaults in the performance of any obligations incumbent upon it to perform hereunder ACHD may terminate this Agreement and the rights extended to Licensee hereunder at any time, effective at the end of thirty (30) days following the date ACHD shall provide written notice of termination to Licensee, which notice shall specify such default(s). Licensee shall have such thirty (30) day period to correct and cure the specified defaults, and if so corrected and cured, to the satisfaction of ACHD, this Agreement shall not be terminated but shall continue in full force and effect. SECTION 6. FEE. There is no annual fee for the Licensee's Authorized Use of the Right-of- Way under this Agreement. TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT- Page 3 SECTION 7. MAINTENANCE; FAILURE TO MAINTAIN; RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. 7.1 At its sole cost and expense, Licensee shall maintain the Improvements in good condition and repair and as required to satisfy applicable laws, the policies of ACHD and sound engineering practices. Licensee shall have access over, across and under the Right-of-Way for the purposes of accomplishing such repair and maintenance. 7.2 If the Highway on and/or adjacent to the Right-of-Way is damaged as a result of: (i) the performance by Licensee of the maintenance required by section 7, or the failure or neglect to perform such maintenance; and/or (ii) Licensee's design, installation or use of the Improvements, regardless of cause; at its sole cost and expense Licensee shall forthwith correct such deficiency and restore the Highway and the surface of the Right-of-Way to the same condition it was in prior thereto, and if Licensee shall fail or neglect to commence such correction and restoration within twenty-four (24) hours of notification thereof, ACHD may proceed to do so, in which event Licensee agrees to reimburse ACHD for the costs and expenses thereof, including, without limitation, reasonable compensation for the use of staff and equipment of ACHD. 7.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of section 7.2, should an emergency exist related to the Licensee's use of this license which threatens the stability or function of the Highway on or adjacent to the Right-of-Way or the safety of the public use thereof, ACHD shall have the right to immediately perform, on behalf of, and at the cost of Licensee necessary emergency repairs. 7.4 Licensee will be responsible for the relocation of any existing utilities located on the Right-of-Way as may be required in connection with any construction or installation of Improvements by Licensee in the Right-of-Way. SECTION 8. RELOCATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. If during the term of this Agreement ACHD requires, in its sole discretion, at any time, and from time to time, that the Highway on and/or adjacent to the Right-of-Way be widened and/or realigned, redesigned, improved and/or reconstructed, Licensee hereby accepts responsibility for all costs for relocating, modifying or otherwise adapting the Improvements to such realignment and/or relocation and/or reconstruction if required by ACHD, which shall be accomplished by Licensee according to designs, plans and specifications approved in advance by ACHD in writing; provided ACHD gives Licensee adequate written notice as necessary to allow Licensee to redesign, relocate, modify or adapt the Improvements to the realignment and/or relocation and/or reconstruction of the Highway and also licenses Licensee such additional area of its right-of-way, if any, as may be necessary for the proper operation of the Improvements. SECTION 9. PERMIT. If the proposed construction and installation of the Improvements, or any reconstruction, relocation or maintenance thereof requires Licensee to obtain a permit under ACHD policies, Licensee shall first obtain such permit from ACHD (Construction Services Division) before commencing such work, and pay the required fees and otherwise comply with the conditions set forth therein. SECTION 10. NO TITLE IN LICENSEE. Except as expressly provided herein, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not create any type of property right, title or interest in Licensee in or to the Right-of-Way other than the right to temporarily use the same pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 4 SECTION 11. NO COSTS TO ACHD. Any and all costs and expenses associated with Licensee's Authorized Use of the Right-of-Way, or any construction or installation of Improvements thereon, or the repair and maintenance thereof, or the relocation of Improvements or utilities thereon, or the restoration thereof at the termination of this Agreement, shall be at the sole cost and expense of Licensee. SECTION 12. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. Licensee agrees to pay all special assessments and personal property taxes that may be levied and assessed on the Improvements during the term of this Agreement. SECTION 13. RESTORATION ON TERMINATION. Upon termination of this Agreement, Licensee will promptly remove all Improvements and restore the Right-of-Way to at least its present condition, less ordinary wear and tear. Should Licensee fail or neglect to promptly remove the Improvements and restore the Right-of-Way, ACHD may do so, and assess Licensee for the costs thereof. Provided, ACHD and Licensee may agree in writing that some or all of such Improvements are to remain on the Right-of-Way following termination, and by entering into such an agreement Licensee thereby disclaims all right, title and interest in and to the same, and hereby grants such Improvements to ACHD, at no cost. Further provided, if the Authorized Use of the Right-of-Way under this Agreement is for landscaping in ACHD right-of- way and the irrigation and maintenance thereof, and the general purpose government with jurisdiction has adopted ordinances, rules and regulations governing the landscaping and maintenance of such right-of-way by owners of the adjacent property, to the extent such owners are obligated to maintain and irrigate the landscaping Licensee need not remove the same from the Right-of-Way. SECTION 14. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent permitted by law, Licensee covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold ACHD harmless from and against any and all claims or actions for loss, injury, death, damages, mechanics and other liens, arising out of the failure or neglect of Licensee, Licensee's employees, contractors and agents, to properly and reasonably make Authorized Use of the Right-of-Way or properly construct, install, plant, repair or maintain the Improvements thereon, or that otherwise result from the use and occupation of the Right-of-Way by Licensee, and including any attorney fees and costs that may be incurred by ACHD in defense of such claims or actions indemnified against by Licensee hereunder. For claims or actions arising out of failures or neglects occurring during the term of this Agreement Licensee's obligations pursuant to this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 5 SECTION 15. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW; WASTE AND NUISANCES PROHIBITED. In connection with Licensee's use of the Right-of-Way, throughout the term of this Agreement Licensee covenants and agrees to: (i) comply and observe in all respects any and all, federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, policies, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, those relating to traffic and pedestrian safety, the Clean Water Act and/or to the presence, use, generation, release, discharge, storage or disposal in, on or under the Right-of-way of any Hazardous Materials (defined as any substance or material defined or designated as hazardous or toxic waste, material or substance, or other similar term, by any federal, state or local environmental statute, regulation or occurrence presently in effect or that may be promulgated in the future); (ii) obtain any and all permits and approvals required by ACHD or any other unit of government; and (iii) commit no waste or allow any nuisance on the Right-of-Way. To the extent permitted by law, Licensee covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold ACHD harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, liens, liabilities and expenses (including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees), arising directly or indirectly from or in any way connected with the breach of the foregoing covenant. These covenants shall survive the termination of this Agreement. SECTION 16. ASSIGNMENT. Licensee, upon the prior written consent of ACHD, may sell, assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement. Upon execution of the Assignment, the assignee assumes all obligations, warranties, covenants and agreements of Licensee herein contained. SECTION 17. ATTORNEYS' FEES. In any suit, action or appeal therefrom to enforce or interpret this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs incurred therein, including reasonable attorneys' fees. SECTION 18. NOTICE. Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and be delivered in person, or by United States Mails, postage prepaid, or by public or private 24-hour overnight courier service (so long as such service provides written confirmation of delivery), or by facsimile verified by electronic confirmation. All notices shall be addressed to the party at the address set forth below or at such other addresses as the parties may from time to time direct in writing by notice given the other. Any notice shall be deemed to have been given on (a) actual delivery or refusal, (b) three (3) days following the day of deposit in the United States Mails, (c) the day of delivery to the overnight courier, or (d) the day facsimile delivery is electronically confirmed. If to ACHD: Ada County Highway District 3775 E. Adams St. Garden City, Idaho 83714 If to Licensee: City of Meridian 33 E Broadway Ave Meridian, ID 83642 SECTION 19. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement, the license herein extended, and the covenants and agreements herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their successors and, if consented to by ACHD under section 16, Licensee's assigns. SECTION 20. EXHIBITS. All exhibits attached hereto and the recitals contained herein are incorporated herein as if set forth in full herein. SECTION 21. RECORDATION. This Agreement shall be recorded by ACHD upon execution in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 6 SECTION 22. Warranty of Authority to Execute. 22.1 The person executing this Agreement on behalf of ACHD represents and warrants due authorization to do so on behalf of ACHD, and that upon execution of this Agreement on behalf of ACHD, the same is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, ACHD. 22.2 If Licensee is not a natural person, the person executing the Agreement on behalf of Licensee represents and warrants due authorization to do so on behalf of Licensee, and that upon execution of this Agreement on behalf of Licensee, the same is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit, of Licensee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed the day, month and year first set forth above. LICENSEE: City of Meridian By: Robert E. Simison 12-16-2025 Its: Mayor ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson 12-16-2025 Its: City Clerk STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on December 1, 2025 by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson Know to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Meridian. Signature of notary public My commission expires: 3-28-2028 INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 7 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT By: Miranda Gold Its: President ATTEST: By: Ryan Head Its: Director STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 20_ by Miranda Gold and Ryan Head know to be the President and Director of the Ada County Highway District Commission. Signature of notary public My commission expires: INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 8 EXHIBITS Exhibit A- Legal Description of Licensee's Property Exhibit B — Depiction of ACHD Right-of-Way Exhibit C —Authorized Use of Right-of-Way The Ada County Highway District(ACHD) is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related regulations and directives. ACHD assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, gender, disability or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any ACHD service, program or activity. INTERAGENCY TEMPORARY LICENSE AGREEMENT - Page 9 EXHIBITA EXHIBIT A .Legal Description Settlers Park — Parcel 1 A parcel being Lot 11 of Block 25 of Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 3 as shown in Book 88 of Plats on Pages 10198 through 10201, records of Ada County, Idaho, and a portion of the SE % of Section 36, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the southwest corner of said SE '/4, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the southeast corner of said SE % bears S 89°19'39" E a distance of 2662.39 feet; Thence along the southerly boundary of said SE % S 89°19'39" E a distance of 596.92 feet to a point; Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 0d40'21" E a distance of 48.00 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way of W. Ustick Road and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said right-of-way N 0053'41" E a distance of 393.45 feet to a point marking the southeast corner of said Lot 11 of Block 25 of Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 3; Thence along the boundary of said Lot 11 of Block 25 the following described courses: Thence N 88d35'36" W a distance of 133.71 feet to a point; Thence N 59d29'53" W a distance of 182.80 feet to a point; Thence N 89d32'09" W a distance of 279.13 feet to a point; Thence N 0d27'43" E a distance of 824.46 feet to a point; Thence S 89d32'07" E a distance of 435.54 feet to a point; Thence S 77d39'57" E a distance of 153.56 feet to a point marking the northeast corner of said Lot 11 of Block 25; Thence leaving said boundary of Lot 11 of Block 25 and along the southerly boundary of said Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 3 and the southerly boundary of Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 2 as shown in Book 86 of Plats on Pages 9732 through 9734, records of Ada County, Idaho, S 89014'33" E a distance of 1596.56 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of Mulberry Subdivision as shown in Book 106 of Plats on Pages 14586 and 14587, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along said westerly boundary S 0051'17" W a distance of 200.59 feet to a point marking the southwest corner of said Mulberry Subdivision; Thence along the southerly boundary of said Mulberry Subdivision S 89010'51" E and the southerly boundary of said Cedar Springs Subdivision No. 2 a distance of 435.10 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-way of N. Meridian Road; Thence along said westerly right-of-way the following described courses: La � � �� Settlers Park PBA—Parcel 1 : ury-Land Seying and Consulting Job No.2 of 2 � Page 1 of 2 EXHIBITA Thence S 0d51'17" W a distance of 115.66 feet to a point; Thence S 5059'19" W a distance of 134.08 feet to a point; Thence S 0051'17" W a distance of 71.07 feet to a point; Thence S 7047'04" W a distance of 84.78 feet to a point; Thence S 2001'18" W a distance of 283.35 feet to a point; Thence S 0051'17" W a distance of 135.43 feet to a point; Thence S 5"59'19" W a distance of 78.23 feet to a point; Thence S 0051'17" W a distance of 139.88 feet to a point; Thence S 34058'10" W a distance of 42.56 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way of W. Ustick Road; Thence along said northerly right-of-way N 89019'39" W a distance of 330.82 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly right-of-way N 0031'46" E a distance of 180.58 feet to a point; Thence N 89046'47" W a distance of 119.01 feet to a point; Thence N 78'11'07') W a distance of 37.44 feet to a point of curvature; Thence a distance of 133.72 feet along the arc of a 75.75 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 101 d08'32" and a long chord bearing S 51 d14'37" W a distance of 117.02 feet to a point of tangency; Thence S 0d40'21" W a distance of 112.56 feet to a point on said northerly right-of-way; Thence along said northerly right-of-way N 89019'39" W a distance of 1404.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 67.62 acres and is subject to any easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS oNPL LA Np Land Solutions, PC 5� S T November 11, 2024 0 11118 11, �2qz 0 F \��C-2 ON W NP UindSolq#iom Settlers Park PBA—Parcel 1 ��— Land Surveying and Consulting Job No.24-45 Page 2 of 2 Cushing Terrell W3 K CLOIERDALE RD, Keyed Notes --------- ----------------- ----------- ff Notes =Zt ----------------- p UREDP,�,R'�L==. Lu Lu c) 8. Z DT cl) Lu E-T. 'MBEDLT�'7�0 IQ. Curb&Gutter Legend 1. T. z < 7: 1i LU WTIT",----- ILL I... ......................................... LL z C) SEE SHEET C2.4 -4- o L) L) N GRADING PLAN AREA A SHEET LOCATION -DING AREA A PLAN- C2.1 ExIaBrf Fo Cushing Keyed Notes Terrell SEE SHEET C2.1 w y r ii r a.,. (r MI m y °I IIY Wn 6913 N LLWERDALE AD. y� � ¢ � I uaasrunEx s�i a .uanE.Ex,u.m.cw�a DDISE ID89]19 T.HnST�Nr THE i ae � 7 Ld wI « 'I Notes,. LU MUN%x " n o. S I I qw TM=xEo" I �.....� w."xos.xox«w..Ex.Ex. xx u II i" YE I ....".fl..ox� RA.oa�.N, •L �e _ Curb x&F oGutter Legend g mm - I �51 ae O s x.,,..PLAT. ."o.°,,.....«u.°, w x 3 d u,a,s.,, '�.y-__- 1 • l ,�,. °.aN.. p .«�Dw°.. w W ACHD Striping Keyed Notes Oo ° ----------------------------- --sr-_---ate. ..a.«...xrv�.re,�wuwu.r�c,-...n,,,x..v�.�x.°.ruu.a. LL SEE SHEET C2.7 . �,. � ,w,.. ..,,,, ox. z O ACHD Striping Notes g L) N GRADING PLAN-AREA D ti .._� E, e. Ra' r{ Y en c ar_fii«m.�m G=+Y-- " w N, a a r o.w.. �. ° M " a .. SEE SHEET C2.7 SHEET LOCATION GRADING PWN- AREA D C2.4 Cushing Terrell SEE SHEET C2.4 � eye o�oes ________________________ ___________ � $ / ------ .w s3�i Rza ovEnonLE AD. -- ��cy,wanacisEEcuaa u+o ra,nEaucExo ism BDISE.D83]13 s=aDxa,.1x 1—�r-'i' a •i \,��n.,, � �fL �~~ x��xE�, 3h3r xm�=.E , , ;• ,7 �.ewo i� SEE SHEET C2.4 d \ �m� �,. rt oEWEo,ow Notes w cq Jnl v>e� ¢ S`V. _ "3 �'' ,xaarcr -+q cif' i U xncxowuovroeecwxws 4 =w111 re,aILI IS LU £ 2 a. R � � 11 w � � ;� ® /��' �'/ ,� oua=m=xsswEac=o=sscav=xrownnnoxsxowxox.xE UR �'I �� j� �I �� a ;_ _ �.,.� `��``"°i_ "--"" � x�-.® � ..xEx.sxaLLxE�E,xn•x�,xE��xsxa.s<oPE wn, MaM � g /T >-� Curb&Gutter Legend w �` cwi LU z LL =noo.x,aaxsno~nFo�.�x ,o.a,E.aox aca o V 1 s ws o x a D E r F R no M�.ffiw x.. ' N jo / OL .... ......... .............................................................L..... ...... --------...................SEE SHEET C2.10 SEE SHEET C2.11 SHEET LOCATION N GRADING PLAN—AREA Gsoxs RKE GRADING PWN- C2n7 Cushing Terrell Keyed Notes SEE SHEET C2.7 Z" ..... .........F .. .... ... ................ r.................... ................ —0 1 I�I ; � �.. �.a � �..°w ��, .�.�, XT.T Z \%M'31� .01 Eo a.o�aEaExnx�,�a�xEEa 1 j - �. oEw .aKa.,,�.o ..�� —E—.TT. Notes .j LU LU LTU u) —NI-1--.1— L LI xo z �`1`"9j,%�� ► ` � „`� �,_„ � �.g ��.� cas�w,aE..00.xwTMxon.ama�w.�aM E x" LU U) LU TE I fNH� R=r n "'AT t —MI. ---------- Curb&Gutter Legend 'ME= @ —R—RT---R el LD oI—I I——R --------I-- ------ TT.-,..—.D, LU + 51 ACHD Striping Keyed Notes 0z C) 1 I ' m 0 ACHD Striping Notes 1 III I '. ,�,� � ;,, � \��`& � ..�M.x.w�a�=,�„m„>ax ti.,,�wa�.�,c.xa�s.x. ----- ........... ................................................................................................. r---- F- ------ SEE SHEET C2.13 SEE SHEET C2.13 N GRADING PLAN-AREA J =M. -L 11 M 0 L SHEET LOCATION —DING A—J PLAN- C2.10 Cushing EXHj�jT Terrell 6313 N LLOVERDALE RD, SUTE 125 BGISE.D83]13 20B.BE6.3Y5 crcksonciNl.um M�EP1 ��A@a � SEE SHEET C2.10 --........ -- '""'r r'"" "r'""""'"""'""""""""""""""'"'......................""""""' """"""""'"""' b Al Keyed Notes R✓,, > wLu Z i \ oO� o 4p o oho oo O��y}DO O d NOteS,�� II o cka m,Ocw wxo wxro,�xxxa LU ws«..,.E - µ� {� #' ursac ossca s xroaunroxv�ovmox,x[ xo C � -- ---4�i nmrx.sxnu ss mno_roxmmiw,usswcurox rnvsmsx, cx,sx.«BEsmooTM rt��xo�TMµ�.��o.rE 6ED mN`oRouwTO, YW,EvnxxoU.EROMo Curb&Gutter Legend U LU vnc..cw..xownenmc,-,see lmaA, LL GRADINGPLAN-AREA M �,.00 µ°�QuR w°E`pom�proms Z o U A B C A r D, E r N R r-Rine F� a o a-0-i -- LlP— SHEET LOCATION GRADING PLAN- C2.13 EXHIBIT C Cushing Terrell 9 LEGEND m m 1 Exls.Ix�,xEE,oaExEMo�Eo + JENSENBELTS + w ssx 'L_EalE x rucxYcan aEOMoxo- — — o,Eosn,a"onnrxos s—LE z c�ssE : a .pl< I zELNxovnsExw,ncxEw vase rzcuxee + xvMxs vaov xow,FssFaEalcx zcussek "�*+, „ xm wME�s F\wwoaoEsan sMx,�EM ,,,, �E� nEx.wnaFow" MnIILL-11 w�a �� ® N I I I � I • N a�\IYps MNVS FlEx s exoEawaFS PvagMlo- 1a lrt Bae 1 { + 7 ncFAGUVWDEN— ,%BB �AFIY I { ; Ia mwwa FaaE=Ea w amson vremvFuvFnoFx 9wL x J ® — EPEax a u z ® a ® wn En'xsoPx,Fa sse ax u s o wLU W p0+® CZC NOTES WO + + # + + + + 0 p r,,u sync xc.mEEsr,aE no*.u,owEo now n.,oE Fnc unEs. ~ zlsnxoMs�oeE xEMovEo,or>unc,,,wMVER InonEs. U e— -- r Mnr UNE SHEETt;3 xx ��lxx— GENERALNOTES a o © Fox vwnFrc oxa,l�. swoon Mxzcx. MnncE sysaFluwx sxEE.,z.ov 77 I 1 � I VWY�vv� ED Z ��swEosvi 0 0 �1\LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA A Z sca.l-we®ao•.az•xa�ss�al � nn—annvE aury L201 EXHIBIT C Cushing Terrell LEGENDN-1 III r\ /� + � ExaTx°TREET°aEREN°�° zcwaaa NBE_ __ � r—� M4TCHLINESHEETLZJI JENSENBELTS ss xR �RR __ERCE xEUCNLCMREUM°NI uminonxr acu"ae y mp _ o�EITsxos I—LE zcueae � g�rcovnaexanTnvusasxix° z tuxes E p zcLrcovnsEaanrn GREcry va9e z cueee cERCS cnxwEN55 FOREST-1 z Cusse ® I "zA�3F +Q Q+ m+Q Q+ +� - � ry uEmxs vRov how nseeaERicx zcume \.yn rg + uou onxEaTsww�c rwnwoR�,Esox ssN°,T�,z,Em H woxP�aoox aw�T°°r. ��.,Ew,cx Ex.aR�xaFww,auro.,x aw��wxoE z cwasa 8SD SS VA -1 � G� ® ®m ® REER°..RH— EVER—I.TII. 1PRU ®mp. —< ncen muuw 4N— H10-51ESTR1 Ba� m — . . ® .E,TxExxEEOExnaa ° scu RZ HEN �.ac RRxamRx,IRal�as �x wx,EEox° w LU W U CZC NOTES W O Eo omnoss Srnc xa mEESnRE noT ri�oweo rvor+ax�Esnc unEs. ~ O +© +® D # + { sp1E�ER°REEumEEST°eE REra°vao T°Twxcmrrx>ER xcxEs U U N. N°>nxgn GENERAL NOTES 1—sv 11=TwxsxEET-1 EE "r o"i I O m O a 000 moo$° T s aE"a°Na z 0 ® z �1\LANDSCAPE PLAN-AREA C uuFi-w�®aoar xa�s�al � nn—ac EauN L203 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Amendment#1 to Interagency Agreement for Roadway Construction/Water and Sewer Construction, Ustick Rd -Ten Mile Road to Linder Rd, ACHD Project# 521052 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION/WATER AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION USTICK RD, TEN MILE RD TO LINDER RD ACHD PROJECT NO. 521052 This Amendment to the Interagency Agreement for Roadway Construction/Water and Sewer Construction,Ustick Rd,Ten Mile Rd to Linder Rd(the"Amendment")is made and entered into effective day of January, 2026 by and between ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the state of Idaho ("DISTRICT" or"ACHD") and the CITY OF MERIDIAN, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("MERIDIAN" or"CITY").ACHD and MERIDIAN may be referred to individually as a"Party" or collectively as "Parties"throughout this Amendment. RECITALS WHEREAS ACHD is a single county-wide highway district organized and existing under the laws of the State of Idaho, with exclusive jurisdiction and authority to maintain, improve, regulate and operate public rights-of-way in Ada County; WHEREAS, CITY is a municipal corporation organized and operating pursuant to Idaho Code Title 50, as amended and supplemented with jurisdiction, authority and police power to regulate and control municipal activities within the City; WHEREAS on August 12, 2025, the Parties entered an Interagency Agreement for Roadway Construction/Water and Sewer Construction, Ustick Rd, Ten Mile Rd to Linder Rd ("Agreement") providing for a cooperative effort to incorporate into the DISTRICT's road construction projects know as Ustick Rd., Ten Mile Rd to Linder Rd,ACHD Project No. 521052 ("Project") certain modifications or improvements to CITY owned facilities, including constructing new water and sewer main, installing a water valve, rehabilitation existing sewer main, adjusting water valve boxes and covers and the sewer manholes to grade, and correction potable/non-potable spacing issues (collectively, "City Water and Sewer Improvements") as detailed in Project, to be constructed pursuant to a separately-executed agreement between DISTRICT and the selected Contractor("Contract"); and WHEREAS Section 2.£of the Agreement states that the CITY shall reimburse DISTRICT for mobilization, traffic control, flagging, detours and weekly meetings on a prorated basis. The prorated basis for the above items will be calculated using the percentage of MERIDIAN's project costs as they relate to the total Project construction costs. WHEREAS the Parties now desire to amend the Agreement to allow for reimbursement payments pursuant to the terms of this Amendment No. 1 ("Amendment"). Amendment No. 1 to the Interagency Agreement (Project 521052) between City of Meridian and ACHD Dated 08.12.2025 AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the recitals, which are incorporated in this Amendment, and in consideration of the premises and the agreement hereinafter contained,ACHD and CITY agree as follows: SECTION 1. Definitions.All capitalized terms in this Amendment that are not defined herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement. SECTION 2. Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated into the body of this Amendment. SECTION 3. Amendment to Payment of Reimbursable Project Costs. The following is added to Section 2 (f) as follows: Reimburse DISTRICT for traffic control, flagging, detours and weekly meetings on a prorated basis. The prorated basis for the above items will be calculated using the percentage of MERIDIAN's project costs as they relate to the total project construction costs. SECTION 4.Amendment No. 1 of the Interagency Agreement.The Agreement,except as modified by this Amendment to the Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. Miscellaneous. 5.1 Binding Effect. This Amendment to the Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 5.2 Attorneys'Fees. Should any party fit it necessary to employ an attorney for representation in any action seeking enforcement of any provisions of the Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Development Agreement or the Cooperative Development Agreement to protect its interests in any matter arising under these agreements, or to recover damages for the breach of these agreement,or to resolve any disagreement in interpretation of these agreements, the unsuccessful party in any final judgment entered therein agrees to reimburse the prevailing party for all reasonable costs, charges and expenses, including attorneys' fees, expended or incurred by the prevailing party in connection with and in connection with any appeal, and the same may be included in such judgment. 5.3 Counterparts This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Amendment No. 1 to the Interagency Agreement (Project 521052) between City of Meridian and ACHD Dated 08.12.2025 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment the day and year first above written. CITY OF MERIDIAN: By: Name: Robert E. Simison Its: Mayor 12-16-2025 Attest: by: Chris Johnson City Clerk 12-16-2025 ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT By: Name: Miranda Gold Its: President, Board of Commissioners Amendment No. 1 to the Interagency Agreement (Project 521052) between City of Meridian and ACHD Dated 08.12.2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 25-2555: A Resolution amending the City of Meridian Records Retention schedule; and providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2555 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR, WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF MERIDIAN RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Idaho Code section 50-907(5) requires City Council to adopt by resolution a records retention schedule listing the various types of city records and the retention period for each type of record; WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code section 50-908(1)(c), the City Clerk serves as the manager of municipal records, and in the course of such duty is charged with supervising the administration of city records, including overseeing retention and destruction of municipal records; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Idaho Code section 50-908(2)(b), the City Clerk has consulted City staff in the various departments regarding updates to the Citywide Records Retention Schedule necessary for the orderly and efficient management of records, and prepared the updated Citywide Records Retention Schedule attached hereto; NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby adopts the attached Records Retention Schedule. Section 2.That the City Clerk is hereby authorized to supervise the administration of City records pursuant to the Records Retention Schedule adopted by this Resolution. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho this 16th day of December,2025.. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho,this 16th day of December,2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison,Mayor Chris Johnson, CityClerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING UPDATED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE PAGE I CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Legal Department Administrative Written messages and reminders, Transitory Until administrative need Records meeting notes, working drafts, legal ends or superseded research source documents and notes, copies of accounts payable invoices and expense reports, presentations, documents recording department activities or plans, department reports to directors, and other material or aids that support an employee's day-to-day job functions. Bankruptcy Records documenting notification Semipermanent 5 years after receipt of Notices and Case to the city that certain individuals IC§50-907(2)(a,g) Trustee Final Report or Files have filed for bankruptcy, and used an Order Dismissing the to determine if the individual owes Case (See Civil Case money to the city and to file notice Files for litigated claims) or claim with the court. Information may include: debtor's name,utility accounts information, prepared repayment plan and related documentation. Budget Working documents utilized to Transitory Until administrative need Preparation establish yearly budget, including ends or superseded Records enhancements, amendments, carry forward support, FTE anticipation, and quotes for goods or services. Civil Case Files Records related to cases filed by Semipermanent 10 years after date of last and against the City, including IC§50-907(2)(g) action bankruptcy litigated claims and land use judicial review/appeals . Includes complaints, summons, investigations, reports, attorney notes, discovery-related records, pleadings, affidavits, motions, deposition transcripts, disposition, orders and judgments, exhibits, appeals, and related records. Contracts Agreements with outside counsel, Semipermanent 5 years after date of last investigators, representatives, and IC§50-907(2)(b) action other parties approved by the City Attorney. Departmental Reports prepared by the city Semipermanent 5 years Reports attorney for the mayor and city IC§50-907(2)(e) council. RESOLUTION ADOPTING UPDATED RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE PAGE 1 RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Director/Manager Director and manager's records Transitory Until employee HR-related regarding City Attorney's Office separation(then Records employees, including performance transferred to HR) evaluations, comment cards, complaints, certificates, etc. Forms and Forms and agreements prepared by Semipermanent 5 years Agreements City Attorney's Office (e.g. consent IC§50-907(2)(g) forms, acknowledgement forms, waiver agreements, liability agreements). Legal Opinions, Formal and informal opinions and Semipermanent 5 years Memoranda memoranda rendered by the city IC§50-907(2)(g) attorney for the mayor, city council, or city departments, examining legal questions relating to state/federal law/rules or local ordinances/policies. Privileged Records held in confidence by the Semipermanent 5 years after separation Administrative City Attorney's Office regarding IC§50-907(2)(g) of investigated employee Records confidential or privileged matters including personnel investigations, settlements related to personnel matters. Settlement Settlement agreements and related Semipermanent 5 years after final Records documentation from civil cases, IC§50-907(2)(g) fulfillment of all parties' claims, mediation, and arbitration. obligations Templates Legal forms and templates. Transitory Until superseded Training Records related to training and Transitory Until administrative need Materials continuing education programs ends or superseded attended by City Attorney's Office staff. Documents may include instructional materials, course descriptions, class enrollment and attendance records, certificates of attendance, etc. Risk Management Claim Files Claims for damages filed by and Semipermanent 5 years for unlitigated against the city, including claims IC§50-907(2)(a,g) claims (See Civil Case caused by City employees/ Files for litigated claims) equipment, including tort claims, property damage records, and related correspondence. Insurance Policy Records documenting the terms Transitory Until administrative need Records and conditions of city insurance ends or superseded policies covering liability, property, motor vehicle, etc. 1IPage CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Administrative Records Activity Daily, weekly monthly or other reports Transitory Until administrative Logs/Reports documenting the activities of the City needs ends Clerk's Office employees, including but not limited to: sign in/out sheet for keys, archival Records and phone Logs, land use, ordinances,permits, minutes, and resolution tracking spreadsheets, and Dashboard statistics. Administrative Copies of: A/P invoices, Expense Transitory Until administrative Records Reports, MIP A/P unposted Reports, need ends or record Detailed Statements of Revenues and is superseded Expenditures. Correspondence Policy/program correspondence, Permanent In perpetuity documenting the formulation, adoption and implementation of significant policy/program decision. Including but not limited to Commission, Committee and City Clerk determination. Records created or received in the course Semipermanent 5 years of administering city policies,procedures or programs,but these records do not provide insight into significant policy, procedure or program discussions or decisions. Correspondence created or received in the Transitory Until administrative course of administering City policies, need ends procedures or programs including but not limited to memos, notes, thank you notes, surveys, letters to businesses and citizens and day-to day office and housekeeping correspondence that does not contain unique information about City functions or programs, for example scrolling agenda and announcements. Customer Complaint or Compliment records Transitory Until administrative Complaints/Kudos including but not limited to letters,phone need ends calls, comment cards and in-person feedback from citizens, customers, developers and contractors. Forms/Templates Forms/Templates created for use by the Transitory Until administrative City Clerk's Office including but not need ends or record limited to visual aids, applications, is superseded checklists, land use transmittals and web documents. 2 1 P a g e RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD HR Documents Departmental employee personnel Transitory Until employment is records, including but not limited to terminated, then training records, coaching notes, forward to HR Performance Evaluation, contact information. Record is confidential and will be kept in a locked file with manager until employment has ended; File sent to HR for retention after termination (voluntary or involuntary). Meeting Records Internal meeting records and/or staff level Transitory Until administrative and Notes notes generated in the course of day to need ends or Special day business, including but not limited to superseded Projects/Initiatives agendas, notes and presentations. Department Departmental Policy or program records Transitory 1 year after Guidelines,Policies, documenting the formulation, adoption document is Procedures, and implementation of departmental replaced and/or Processes and policy or program decisions. Including administrative need Reports but not limited to Standard Operating ends Procedures and Guidelines, reference materials or materials obtained from another government entity or agency used in the development of said procedure. Presentations Formal department presentations to Transitory Until administrative Council, Chamber of Commerce or other need ends agencies/entities or people, e.g. New Council member training, Joint Council/Commission workshop training. Telephone Records Message logs, voicemails, Mitel call Transitory Until administrative volume reports etc. need ends Operational Records Audio/Video Audio and video recordings of City Semipermanent 5 years Recordings Council, Commission and Committee Meetings. City Council and Records documenting meetings of the Permanent In perpetuity Planning and City Council and/or Planning and Zoning IC§50- Zoning Meeting Commission and motions, resolutions, 907(1)(a) Agenda,Minutes ordinances, transcripts and other actions and Minute Books taken at meetings. Contracts & Agreements with vendors and other Semipermanent 10 years after Agreements to parties for the acquisition, lease, lease- IC§50- expiration which the City is a purchase or sale of equipment, supplies, 907(2)(b) Party services or property, letters of credit, warranty surety agreements which have been approved at a City Council meeting, approved by the Mayor, or have been recorded with Ada County. 3 1 P a g e RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Easement Easement agreements which have been Permanent In perpetuity Agreements to approved at a City Council meeting, which the City is a approved by the Mayor, or have been Party recorded with Ada County. Deeds & Real Records relating to ownership of real Permanent In perpetuity Property Records property, including deeds, title opinions, IC§50- abstracts and certificates of title, title 907(1)(e) insurance, documentation concerning alteration or transfer of title, and records relating to acquisition and disposal of real property such as offer letters, options, agreements of short duration, staff reports, appraisal and inspection reports, letters of transmittal, and related records. Election— Reports showing contributions and Permanent In perpetuity Campaign Finance expenditures in city campaigns by IC§50- Reports mayor/council candidates, political 907(1)(g) committees and independent persons/entities. Includes C-1 (Certification of Treasurer), C-2 (Campaign Financial Disclosure Report), C-4 (Independent Expenditures), C-5 (48 Hour Notice of Contributions/Loans Received), C-6 (Statement by Nonbusiness Entity), and C-7 (48 Hour Notice of Independent Expenditures). Election— Includes declarations of candidacy and Permanent In perpetuity Candidate intent for candidates for city elective IC§50- Declarations & office. Declarations of candidacy are 907(1)(g) Petitions filed by candidates to get their name on the election ballot, and are accompanied by a filing fee of$40 or a petition with the signatures of at least five qualified city electors, including a certification by the county clerk of the number of signatures that are of qualified city electors. Declarations of intent are filed by write-in candidates, and do not require the filing fee or petition. Election— Includes the first and second notice of Permanent In perpetuity General/Regular election and sample ballot which are IC§50- (Election Files) published in the official newspaper, poll 907(1)(g) books showing the name, address and signature of those voting in City elections, and the tally book in which election staff record and total the votes 4 1 P a g e RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD cast for each candidate and ballot question at the polling precinct. Oaths of Office Signed oaths of elected officials swearing Permanent In perpetuity to uphold the federal and state constitutions and laws of the city. Passports—General Training records, Department of State Transitory Until administrative Information monthly newsletters, and Passport need ends or record Agent's Reference Guide. is superseded Passports— Daily transmittal spreadsheets that Transitory 2 years Transmittals accompany passport applications mailed to the Department of State Regional office. Permits & Licenses Records relating to city permits and Semipermanent 5 years licenses issued in the City Clerk's Office. IC§50- 907(2)(d) Public Notices Records relating to proof of mailings. Transitory Until administrative need ends Public Records Written public records requests, city Temporary 1 years after last Requests denials of public records requests, action responses, etc. Records Destruction records including tracking Permanent In perpetuity Management reports, destruction resolution and Records authorization from Idaho State Historical Society and legal counsel. Records of Records of historical significance not Permanent In perpetuity Historical otherwise maintained by the Meridian Significance Historical Preservation Commission. Room Scheduling & Records documenting scheduling and Transitory Until administrative Reservation reservations related to public meeting need ends Records for City rooms in City Hall. Such as reservation Hall request forms, and Outlook calendar scheduling records. Vehicle Titles State of Idaho Certificate of Title for Transitory Until vehicle is no vehicles owned by the City. longer owned by the City 5 1 P a g e COMMISSIONS,` COMMITTEES,AND BOARDS RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Agendas Agendas of commission, committee, Permanent In perpetuity or board meetings. IC§50- 9071) a Audio Recordings Audio recordings of commission, Semipermanent 5 years committee, or board meetings. IC§§50- 907(2)(g) Board of Documents associated with BOA Temporary 2 years Adjustment(BOA) proceedings to include but not limited IC§50- Hearing Packets to BOA hearing request form, billing 907(3)(d) records, relevant utility billing/public works records, notice of hearing, hearing correspondence, findings/order, and any other documents relevant to the BOA hearing process. Bylaws Internal rules governing commission, Permanent In perpetuity committee, or board structure, IC§50- o erations, procedures, officers, etc. 907 1 Contact Document listing commission, Transitory Until administrative Information committee, or board members' names, need ends addresses, phone numbers, e-mail addresses, etc. Correspondence Correspondence regarding day-to-day Transitory Until administrative commission, committee, or board need ends operations or administration. Historical Project Records documenting a commission, Historical In perpetuity Records committee, or board project of IC§50-907(4) historical or cultural significance to the City and/or Meridian community. Minutes Summary or verbatim minutes of Permanent In perpetuity commission, committee, or board meetings; documents and other written or visual materials presented at meetings (e.g., handouts, photos, presentations, etc.). Project Files and Documents and materials used by staff Transitory Until administrative Reports or commission, committee, or board need ends members in the course of researching, developing, completing, reporting on, or acting on initiatives of the commission/committee/board. Roster, current List of current commission/committee/ Transitory Until record is board members, including names, seat superseded numbers, and appointment dates. 6 1 P a g e RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Roster, historical List of all commission, committee, or Permanent In perpetuity board members throughout history of IC§50-907(4) the body; may include names, seat numbers, dates of appointment and departure. *Note: This schedule does not apply to City Council or Planning &Zoning Commission records, which are addressed in Clerk's Office Records Retention Schedule. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Administrative—All Divisions Activity Logs/Reports Daily, weekly, monthly, or other reports Transitory Until documenting the activities of the administrative Community Development (CD) employees, need ends including, but not limited to: sign in/out sheet for credit card, car sign in/out, archival records log, and dashboard. Administrative Records Copies of. A/P invoices, expense reports, Transitory Until A/P unposted Reports, Detailed Statements administrative of Revenues, and Expenditures. need ends or record is superseded Budget Preparation Working documents utilized to build base Transitory 1 year or until Records budgets and establish yearly budgets, administrative including, but not limited to: enhancements, need ends amendments, carry forward support, Full Time Equivalent(FTE) anticipation, vehicle replacement, and quotes for service/maintenance. Committee/Ad-Hoc Agendas and meeting minutes/notes for Temporary 2 years Team Records special groups convened by Community Development for specific purposes such as understanding operational gaps, Code issues, and process delays. Correspondence Policy/program correspondence, Permanent In perpetuity documenting the formulation, adoption, and implementation of significant policy/program decisions. 7 1 P a g e RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Records created or received in the course of Semi- 5 years administering city policies,procedures, or permanent programs,but these records do not provide insight into significant policy, procedure, or program discussions or decisions, including, but not limited to: citizen response letters, change of address notifications including corner lot change of address, and street name changes. Correspondence and support material Transitory Until created or received in the course of administrative administering City policies, SOPs, need ends programs, or customer service requests; including other city departments and interagency coordination, including, but not limited to: lists, maps, graphics, figures, and other location specific materials and information, thank you notes, letters to businesses, citizens, and day-to-day office and housekeeping correspondence, for example: final action courtesy letters, will- serve letters and address verifications. Customer Complaint or compliment records including, Transitory Until Complaints/Kudos but not limited to: letters, phone calls, administrative comment cards and in person feedback from need ends citizens, customers, developers and contractors. Department Departmental policy or program Permanent In perpetuity Guidelines, Policies, correspondence, documenting the Procedures, Processes formulation, adoption, and implementation and Reports of significant departmental policy or program decisions, including, but not limited to: Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and department guidelines, etc. Departmental records created or received in Temporary 2 years or until the course of administering departmental administrative policies, procedures, or programs, but these need ends records do not provide insight into significant policy,procedure,program, discussions, or decisions. Including,but not limited to: citizen response letters. 8 1 P a g e RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD City/departmental SOP/policy manual or Transitory I year after reference material from another government document agency or business. replacement or until administrative need ends Director Documents, including, but not limited to: Permanent In perpetuity Determination/ written request for Unified Development Interpretation Code (UDC) interpretation, analysis, and the responsive departmental opinion. Forms/Templates Forms/templates created for use by the CD Transitory Until department, including, but not limited to: administrative visual aids/cut-sheets, applications, need ends or checklists, and web documents. record is superseded HR Documents Departmental employee personnel records, Transitory Until employment including, but not limited to: training is terminated; then records, coaching notes, performance forward to HR evaluation, contact information; record is confidential and will be kept in a locked file, with manager, until employment has ended. Marketing Materials Documents, including, but not limited to: Transitory Until record is working and draft research superseded or products/materials, analysis, maps, images, administrative photos, demographics, market studies, need ends conference materials, site selector information, spreadsheets, public outreach/town hall information, publications, or other metrics for department, inter-departmental, and external customers. Meeting Records and Internal meeting records and notes Transitory Until Notes generated in the course of day- to- day administrative business, including, but not limited to: need ends or agendas, notes, and presentation. record is superseded Presentations Formal department presentations to City Transitory Until Council, Commissions, Chamber of administrative Commerce, other agencies/entities, or need ends people. 9 1 P a g e RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Professional Service Documents or communication related to a Transitory Until Agreement PSA/contract, including, but not limited to: administrative (PSA)/Contracts copies of contract documents; emails need ends including(performance related) correspondence from our PSA consultants (electrical,plumbing, mechanical, structural, and fire disciplines). Special Final departmental documents related to Permanent In perpetuity Projects/Initiatives special, non-confidential, or one-time projects, including,but not limited to: strategic plan initiatives, urban renewal districts, inventory, or non- application specific projects. Work-in-progress documents, material, or Transitory Until record is work products for ongoing or one-time superseded or projects, including,but not limited: to administrative strategic plan initiatives, urban renewal need ends districts, inventory, or non-application specific projects. Staff Working Documents, including, but not limited to: Transitory Until record is Documents, Notes and notes, draft spreadsheets, PowerPoints, superseded or Drafts Word, Adobe InDesign documents and administrative underlying work-in-progress information need ends that supports the day-to-day staff s job function. Reference/Owner's Documents, including, but not limited to: Transitory Until record is Manuals/ owner's manuals, International Code superseded or Handbooks Council (ICC), and reference documents administrative from other companies, government agencies need ends (e.g. Idaho Power, American Disabilities Administration(ADA), Ada County Highway District(ACHD), Energy Commission, etc.). Reports & Studies Documents, including, but not limited to: Transitory Until record is draft research information, market studies, superseded or planning studies, and related documents not administrative adopted in the Comprehensive Plan or UDC need ends (e.g. pathways, downtown street crossing). Telephone Records Message logs, voicemails, ShoreTel/Mitel Transitory Until call volume reports, etc. administrative need ends Zoning Verification Documents, including, but not limited to: Semi- 10 years Letter written requests for zoning analysis of a permanent 101Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD specific parcel/property and the responsive departmental opinion. -Building Division-Commercial and Government Buildings Building plans and Drawn and written approved-for- Permanent In perpetuity specifications for construction plans and specifications for commercial and commercial and government buildings, government buildings dated January 2012 or later, including but dated January 2012 not limited to: structural calculations; and later geotechnical investigations/reports (soil classifications; strength, compressibility, load bearing values tests; groundwater; borings; pits; subsurface explorations); and Certificates of Occupancy. Building permit files Records related to commercial and Permanent In perpetuity for commercial governmental building projects, dated projects and January 2012 or later, including but not government buildings limited to: building, mechanical,plumbing, dated January 2012 fire, and/or electrical permit applications, and later inspection records, and permits; letters of completion; certificates of values; and correspondence. (Kept in Accela. Temporary certificates Temporary certificates of occupancy issued Transitory Until issuance of of occupancy for for commercial and government buildings. Final CO commercial and government buildings Notices of Violation, Records related to reports and Transitory Until resolved(or stop work orders, investigations of building code violations, if transferred to related records including, but not limited to: signed letters Meridian Police of alternative compliance from design Department/Code professional, engineers, or architects; letters Enforcement generated from City's legal counsel; notes Division or of conversations; telephone logs; photos, prosecutor, see reports, and analyses of violations. respective agency's records retention schedules) All building records All records regarding commercial and Semi- 5 years regarding commercial government buildings dated before January permanent and government 2012. buildings dated before January 2012 Sign permit plans and Drawn and written approved-for- Permanent In perpetuity(see specifications construction plans and specifications for also related signs. records in Planning Division 11 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD records retention schedule) Building Division—Non-Commercial and Non-Government Buildings (Residential) Building plans and Drawn and written approved-for- Permanent In perpetuity specifications for non- construction building plans and Certificates commercial and non- of Occupancy, dated January 2012 or later. government buildings dated January 2012 and later Building permit files Records related to non-commercial and Permanent In perpetuity for non-commercial non-governmental building projects, dated projects and non- January 2012 or later, including but not government buildings limited to: building, mechanical,plumbing, dated January 2012 fire, and/or electrical permit applications, and later inspection records, and permits; letters of completion; certificates of values; and correspondence. (Kept in Accela.) Temporary certificates Temporary certificates of occupancy issued Transitory Until issuance of of occupancy for non- for non-commercial and non-government Final CO commercial and non- buildings. government buildings Notices of Violation, Records related to reports and Transitory Until resolved(or stop work orders, investigations of building code violations, if transferred to related records including, but not limited to: signed letters Meridian Police of alternative compliance from design Department/Code professional, engineers, or architects; letters Enforcement generated from City's legal counsel; notes Division or of conversations; telephone logs; photos, prosecutor, see reports, and analyses of violations. respective agency's records retention schedules) All building records All records regarding non-commercial and Semi- 5 years regarding non- non-government buildings dated before permanent commercial and non- January 2012. government buildings dated before January 2012 Land Development Division 121Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Permits and Files or documents created and/or used in Transitory Until Inspection Records— the land developments phase of all administrative All Land Development Governmental, Commercial, or need ends (Accela Record ID's) Residential/Commercial Subdivision projects with Accela ID's (LD-RSUB, LD- CSUB, LD-CAP, LD-MISC, LD-WSA, LDIR). Surety(performance) All documents related to surety agreements, Transitory Until requirements including, but not limited to work-in- and/or conditions progress files for development of a surety are met and agreement(correspondence,bids, memos, administrative surety applications, contract filing need ends or information), Letters of Credit, Bonds, release occurs securing the performance compliance with whichever is later requirements or conditions of a project including, but not limited to sewer, water, landscaping, fencing, amenities, car ports, pathways, lighting, paving/striping for private park lot(s), etc. Letters of Credit/Bond(s) Transitory Until requirements and/or conditions are met and administrative need ends or release occurs, whichever is later (see Clerk's schedule) Cash Transitory Until requirements and/or conditions are met and administrative need ends or release occurs, whichever is later (see Finance's schedule) Surety (warranty) All documents related to Surety Transitory Until requirements Agreements, including, but not limited to and/or conditions working files for development of a surety are met and agreement(correspondence,bids, memos, Administrative surety applications, business filing need ends or information), Letters of Credit, Bonds, release occurs, securing the performance and warranty whichever is later compliance with requirements or conditions of a project; including,but not limited to 131Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD sewer, water, landscaping, fencing, amenities, car ports, pathways, lighting, paving/striping, and private park lot(s) etc. Letters of Credit/Bond(s) Transitory Until requirements and/or conditions are met and administrative need ends or release occurs, whichever is later (see Clerk's schedule) Cash Transitory Until requirements and/or conditions are met and administrative need ends or release occurs, whichever is later (see Finance's schedule) -Planning Division-Administrative Applications Accessory Use Permits Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity for Daycare or Home application, associated checklist items, and Occupation staff report with decision letter. Alternative Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Compliance application, associated checklist items and decision letter, or decision is rendered with a concurrent administrative or hearing application. Certificate of Zoning Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Compliance application, associated checklist items, certificate of zoning compliance (CZC), and staff report. Conditional Use Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Permit Minor application, associated checklist items, and Modification staff report with decision letter. Design Review Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, and design review staff report, or decision is rendered with a concurrent CZC staff report. Private Road Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, tentative decision letter, maintenance 141Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD agreement, reciprocal cross access easement and final decision letter. Property Boundary Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Adjustment application, associated checklist items and tentative decision letter, final decision letter, and documents that include recorded record of survey, new deeds,new tax parcel numbers, etc. Sign Permit Plans & Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Specifications application, associated check list items and approved, sign specifications (plans/design/drawings). Sign: Planned Sign Documents, including, but not limited to Semi- 5 years after Program (No longer approved application, and sign requirements permanent revocation from issuing,but still have for a specific project. property owner -existing records) Sign: Limited Documents, including,but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Duration application, associated checklist items, and approved sign design/drawings. Surety: Planning Included in Land Development Description. See Land See Land Developme Development nt Schedule Schedule for for retention retention Time Extension Documents including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, staff report, and decision letter. Vacation Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items and staff report with decision letter. Annexation Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, staff report, Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations, and Findings. Comprehensive Plan Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Text and Map application, associated checklist items, staff Amendments report, area of city impact negotiation with Ada County, Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations, Findings if accompanying another concurrent hearing application. 151Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD City Council Review Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity (appeal) application, associated checklist items, staff report/memo and decision letter. Conditional Use Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Permit Modification application, associated checklist items, staff report, and Findings. Development Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Agreement application, associated checklist items, staff Modification report, draft copy of the amended development agreement, and Findings. Planned Unit Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Development application, associated checklist items, staff report, Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations, and Findings. Final Plat Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Modification application, associated checklist items, staff report, and Order of decision. Preliminary Plat Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, staff report, Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations, and FFCL. Preliminary and Final Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Plat application, associated checklist items, staff report, letter of completion, FFCL, and Order of decision. Final Plat Documents, including, but not limited to: Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, staff report, letter of completion and Order of Decision. Short Plat Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, staff report, and FFCL. Rezone Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, staff report, Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations, and Findings. Time Extension - Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Planning & Zoning application, associated checklist items, staff Commission or report, and Order. Council Unified Development Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity Code Text application, associated checklist items, staff Amendment report, and Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendations. 16 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Vacation Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, and staff report. Variance Documents, including, but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity application, associated checklist items, staff report, and Findings. FINANCE DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Administrative—All(Administration,Arts & Culture, Billing, Budget, Controller, Purchasing) Activity Daily, weekly monthly or other reports Transitory Until one year after Logs/Reports documenting the activities of the audit Finance Department employees, including but not limited to: sign in/out sheet for credit card, car sign in/out, etc. Correspondence Adopted policy/programs impacting Permanent In perpetuity departments City-wide. Records created or received in the Semipermanent 5 years course of administering city policies, procedures or programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy,procedure or program discussions or decisions. Including but not limited to Citizen Response letters, billing adjustment requests, etc. Correspondence created or received in Transitory Until administrative the course of administering City need ends policies, procedures or programs including but not limited to Memos, transmittals, notes, comments, thank you notes, letters to businesses and day-to day office and housekeeping correspondence that does not contain unique information about City functions or programs. Committee Agendas and meeting minutes/notes for Transitory Until administrative Records special groups convened by the need ends department for specific purposes such as understanding operational procedures, gaps, and process delays. Customer Comment cards, copies of emails, Transitory Until administrative Complaints/Kudos letters, and other documents relaying need ends complaints or kudos for staff and/or department functions. 171Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Department Finance Departmental Standard Transitory Until record is Guidelines, Operating Policy/Procedures. superseded Policies, Procedures, and Processes Administrative Documents generated by department Transitory Until administrative Reports staff for miscellaneous internal reports. need ends May also include complaints or compliment records including but not limited to letters,phone calls, comment cards and in person feedback from citizens, customers. Forms/Templates Forms/Templates created for use by the Transitory Until administrative Finance Department including but not need ends or record limited to visual aids, applications and is superseded checklist, billing forms, budget and purchasing templates. HR Documents Departmental employee personnel Transitory Until employment is records kept in locked files with terminated; then manager until employment has ended; forward to HR File sent to HR for retention after termination (voluntary or involuntary). Staff Records and Records and notes generated in the Transitory Until administrative Notes course of day to day business, including need ends or record but not limited to; agendas, minutes, is superseded notes, presentations, notebooks, meeting notes, to-do lists, employee—compiled notes, etc. May also include documented attendance and presentation by Finance Department employees at conventions, conferences, seminars, workshops and similar training events. Includes training requests, training and Continuing Education Unit tracking reports and other related correspondence. Photographs Includes both formal and informal Transitory Until administrative photos from events or day to day need ends or record operations. is superseded Presentations Formal department presentations to Transitory Until record is Council or others, e.g. New Council superseded or member training, citywide staff training. administrative need ends Reference/Owner's Documents to include but not limited to: Transitory Until record is Manuals/Books equipment manuals, reference materials. superseded or administrative need ends 18 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Special Documents related to special or non- Temporary 2 years or until Projects/Initiatives confidential one-time projects. administrative need ends Telephone Records Message logs, voicemails, etc. Transitory Until administrative need ends Accounting Accounts Payable Records documenting payment of city Semipermanent 5 years bills, including reports, invoices, check IC§50- stubs,purchase orders, payment 907(2)(a) authorizations. Accounts Records documenting billing and Semipermanent 5 years Receivable collection of monies owed to the city by IC§50- vendors, citizens, organizations, 907(2)(a) governments, etc. Records include: reports, receipts, invoices, statements, etc. Information typically includes: receipt amount, date, invoice number, name, account number, account balance, adjustments, etc. Cash Receipts Receipt and supporting documentation. Semipermanent 5 years IC§50- 907(2)(a) Grant Records Records documenting the application, Semipermanent 10 years from final evaluation, awarding, administration, IC§50- grant close-out reporting and status of grants applied 907(2)(g) for, received, awarded or administered by the city. Records include: applications and proposals, summaries, objectives, activities,budgets, exhibits, award notices,progress reports, contracts, financial reports, and related correspondence and documentation. Liens Liens held by the city and any Semipermanent 5 years after lien corresponding release of liens. Insert Code released Sales & Use Tax Used to report and remit sales tax Semipermanent 5 years Forms collected and due to the state. IC§50- 907(2)(a) Travel Records Records documenting requests, Semipermanent 5 years authorizations, reimbursements, and IC§50- other actions related to employee travel, 907(2)(a) including expense reports and receipts, vouchers and related documents. Budget 191Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Financial Reports Reports documenting the financial Semipermanent 10 years Quarterly condition and operation of the city, IC§50- Published Reports include information on revenues 907(2)(a) and expenditures in relation to the final budget. Financial Reports Reports and data used to document the Semipermanent 5 years Year End financial condition and operation of the IC§50- city, sub ledgers related to, but not 907(2)(a) including the final Audit Report. Bank Transaction Records documenting the status and Semipermanent 5 years Records transaction activity of city bank IC§50- accounts, including account statements. 907(2)(a) Budget Hearing Newspaper notice of budget hearing. Permanent In perpetuity Notice IC§50- 907(1)(h) , Held in Clerk's Office Budget Records Records used in preparing and adopting Semipermanent 10 years the city budget, including revenue IC§50- projections, instructions, department 907(2)(a) requests, worksheets, council-approved tentative budget and notice of budget hearing, adopted appropriations ordinance and amendments, and other information. Capital Asset Record of purchase, vendor invoice and Semipermanent 5 years Records— related documents. IC§50- Purchase 907(2)(a) Capital Asset Record of disposal, department request Semipermanent 5 years after disposal Records—Disposal of disposal. IC§50- 907(2)(a) Gift and Records documenting gifts and Semipermanent 10 years Contribution contributions to the city. IC§50- Records 907(2)(a) Chief Financial Officer Investment Reports, statements, summaries, Semipermanent 5 years Records correspondence and other records IC§50- documenting and tracking investments 907(2)(a) made by the city, including the Local Government Investment Pool. Controller Accounting Transaction records within the Semipermanent 10 years Software Records Accounting Software system: including IC§50- -payroll, vendor listing, vendor 907(2)(a) payments, vendor purchase orders, 201Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD budget transactions, cash receipts, and general ledger. Audit Report Documents the city's annual audit, Permanent In perpetuity examining compliance with generally IC§50- accepted accounting principles and 907(1)(d); Held methods, the accuracy and legality of in Clerk's transactions and accounts, and Office compliance with requirements, orders, and regulations pertaining to the financial condition and operation of the city. Information includes: financial statements, auditor's report and recommendations, single audit information concerning federal grants, and other information. Bond Records Records documenting financing of city Permanent In perpetuity improvements through bonded IC§50- indebtedness. Records include bond 9 0 7(1)(a)(b)(h); rating information,bond and election Held in Clerk's ordinances, legal notices announcing Office bond election, bond counsel information and opinions, covenants, paid bonds and coupons, bond registers, State Treasurer public bond issue reports (IDAPA 54.01.01), etc. Monthly bond statements,payments of Semipermanent 5 years after final bonds payment of bond Departmental Reports documenting the financial Semipermanent 10 years Reports condition and operation of the city, IC§50- issued on a monthly, quarterly, annual or 907(2)(e) other basis, including quarterly published treasurer's report and year-end financial reports. Reports include information on revenues and expenditures in relation to the final budget. General Ledgers Records documenting the summary of Semipermanent 10 years accounts reflecting the financial position IC§50- of the city, showing debit, credit and 907(2)(a) balance amounts per account,budget, fund and department, asset depreciation, and totals for notes receivable, interest income, amounts due from other funds, bank loans received, cash in escrow, deferred loans received, cash, revenue, accounts receivable, accounts payable, etc. 21 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Journal Entries Records including detailed reports and Semipermanent 5 years back up documentation for journal IC§50- entries. 907 2 a) Local Records documenting the formation of a Permanent In perpetuity Improvement local improvement district and levying IC§50- Districts (LID) of special assessments, including: 907(1)(e); Held ordinance, published notices, assessment in Clerk's roll, appeals, affidavits,bonds and Office coupons, delinquencies, and related correspondence and documents. Real Property Records of real property. Permanent In perpetuity Title Records IC§50- 907(1)(e); Held in Clerk's Office Payroll Administrative Reports, statistical studies, and other Semipermanent 10 years Reports records designed and used for budget IC§50- preparation, projections, workload and 907(2)(a) personnel management, and research and general reference. Deduction Records documenting employee Semipermanent 5 years after Authorization authorization for voluntary payroll IC§50- employee separation Records deductions. Records may include: direct 907(2)(a) bank deposits, insurance applications, enrollment cards, deduction authorizations, approval notices, deduction terminations, and related records. Federal & State Records, in addition to those itemized in Semipermanent 5 years Tax Records this section, used to report the collection, IC§50- distribution, deposit, and transmittal of 907(2)(a) federal and state income taxes as well as social security tax. Examples include: the federal miscellaneous income statement(1099), employers' quarterly federal tax return (941, 941 E), tax deposit coupon(8109), and similar federal and state completed forms. Garnishment Records documenting requests and court Semipermanent 5 years after Record orders to withhold wages from employee IC§50- termination. earnings for garnishments, tax levies, 907(2)(a) support payments, and other reasons. Usually includes original writs of garnishment, orders to withhold, federal or state tax levies, recapitulations of amounts withheld, and related records. 221Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Information usually includes: employee name and social security number, name of agency ordering garnishment, amount, name of party to whom payment is submitted, dates, and related data. Registers—Other Monthly registers documenting earnings, Transitory Disposed yearly after deductions, and withholdings of city audit employees. Registers Year Payroll Registers: Registers or records Semipermanent 5 years End serving the same function of IC§50- documenting the earnings, voluntary and 907(2)(a) required deductions, and withholdings of city employees. Information usually includes employee name and social security number, hours worked, rate, overtime, vacation value, various allowance, gross pay, federal and state withholding, voluntary deductions, net pay, and related data. Time Records Records documenting hours worked, Semipermanent 5 years after leave hours accrued, and leave hours IC§50- employee separation taken by city employees. Information 907(2)(a) usually includes: employee name and employee number, hours worked, type and number of leave hours taken, total hours, dates and related data. W2s Annual statements documenting Semipermanent 5 years individual employee earnings and IC§50- withholdings for state and federal 907(2)(a) income taxes and social security tax, also known as federal tax form W-2. Information includes: city name and tax identification number, employee name and social security number, wages paid, amounts withheld, and related data. W4s Certificates documenting the exemption Semipermanent 5 years after status of individual city employees, also IC§50- employee separates known as W-4 forms. Information 907(2)(a) includes: employee name and address, social security number, designation of exemption status, and signature. PERSI Records Records relating to PERSI, including Semipermanent 5 years Employer Remittance Forms, invoices, IC§50- correspondence, financial adjustments, 907(2)(a) etc. 231Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Unemployment Records documenting employee Semipermanent 5 years Reports earnings on a quarterly basis. Used to IC§50- document costs and charges in the event 907(2)(a) of an unemployment compensation claim. Information includes: employee name and social security number, quarterly earnings. Purchasing Contracts Agreements with vendors and other Semipermanent 10 years from date of parties either in hard copies or contained IC§50- substantial on the Contract Management Database 907(2)(b) completion for the acquisition or sale of equipment, supplies, services or property, also includes insurance certificates,payment and performance bonds pertaining to a solicitation or contract that Purchasing is facilitating. Original agreements and contracts that Permanent, In perpetuity have been approved by Council. Held in Clerk's Office Lease Agreements Lease agreements for property or Semipermanent 5 years equipment. IC§50- 907 2 Purchase Orders Requests and purchase orders for goods Semipermanent 10 years or services purchased by the city. IC§50- Information includes: department, 907(2)(a) delivery location, date, quantity, description,unit and total price, and authorizing signatures. Purchasing Records documenting competitive Semipermanent 10 years from the Selection bidding and purchase of goods, services, IC§50- date of award and public works construction, and 907(2)(a) procurement of design professionals. Records include: published notices and solicitations, specifications, bids, requests for qualifications, statements of qualifications, etc. Utility Billing Adjustment Records documenting adjustments to Semipermanent 5 years Registers customer water, sewer, garbage or other IC§50- city-provided service billings for debits, 907(2)(a) credits, refunds, returned checks, and related reasons. Information usually includes: customer's name and address, type of adjustment,justification, amount changed, authorizing signatures and 241Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD other information. (Records held within the billing software). Billing Directive Application completed by owner or Semipermanent 5 years property manager to initiate Third Party IC§50- billing for specified utility account. 907(2)(a) Information included: owner, property manager, tenant, move-in date, and service address. Billing/Payment Records documenting transactions on Semipermanent 5 years Registers the water, sewer, garbage or other city- IC§50- provided service account of each 907(2)(a) customer. Useful for reference to assure accurate customer billings and posting of payments. Information often includes: customer's name, service address, meter reading, water usage,utility charges, payments, adjustments and related data. (records held within the billing software). Change Record Records documenting routine Semipermanent 5 years information changes to customer IC§50- accounts, including name and address. 907(2)(a) (Records held within the billing software). Customer File General correspondence and forms Semipermanent 5 years related to a specific utility account. This IC§50- information would be in addition to that 907(2)(a) found within the billing software. Documents in file may include and are not limited to: general letters, payment arrangement forms, third party billing docs, hard copies of customer history reports, leak adjustment requests, letters submitted to the City for customers. Disconnect Notice Notice to City Council to verify that no Semipermanent 5 years to City Council customer currently slated for shut off IC§50- due to non-payment has requested a 907(2)(a) hearing with the Board of Adjustment. Notice includes number of customers slated for shut off and the value of the delinquent accounts. Disconnect Record Records documenting a customer's Semipermanent 5 years request for disconnection of water, IC§50- sewer, garbage or other city-provided 907(2)(a) services. (Records held within the billing software). 251Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Meter Readings Document the readings of customer Semipermanent 5 years water meters for billing purposes. IC§50- Information typically includes: meter 907(2)(a) reading, date read, account number, billing code, final reading, reason for turnoff, meter changes, and related data. (records held within the billing software Payment One-page document that records a Transitory Until administrative Arrangements customer's promise to pay. need ends. Renter Supplemental document completed by Semipermanent 5 years Addendums the tenant to accept the third party IC§50- billing for specified utility account. 907(2)(a) Information included: tenants name, service address, mailing address and hone number. Security Deposit Records documenting customer payment Semipermanent 5 years Records of a security deposit to receive IC§50- temporary dumpster services. 907(2)(a) Information usually includes date, amount of deposit, customer's name, address, and account number, date account closed, refund date, amount of deposit applied, and related information. Shut Off Turn On Electronic spreadsheet used during shut Semipermanent 5 years off day by water department field staff IC§50- and MUBS. Tracks customers that are 907(2)(a) to be shut off,payments, and turn-ons as authorized. Record includes: Customer name, service address, meter id, time of shut off, time of payment, time of turn- on, fee waived if applicable and general notes. FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Administrative Records regarding day-to-day administration Transitory Until administrative Records of department, e.g., copies of invoices, travel need ends or record is records, uniform clothing purchases, fuel superseded charges, fuel receipts, fuel reports, inventory asset information forms, phone logs and waste water inventory. Car Seat Car seat inspection forms. Semipermanent 10 years Inspections 26 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Correspondence Day-to-day office and housekeeping Transitory Until administrative correspondence not unique to city functions need ends or programs. General administrative correspondence, Semipermanent 5 years including records created or received in the course of administering city policies/programs, but not related to significant policy/program discussions or decisions. Includes customer survey cards. Policy/program correspondence, documenting Permanent In perpetuity the formulation, adoption, and implementation of significant policy/program decisions, including letters to personnel, Certified Family Home Fire District letters, letters re arding training burns, etc. Department Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Department Permanent In perpetuity Reports reports. Equipment and Records relating to equipment and vehicles Semipermanent Destroy five (5) years Vehicle Test, owned and serviced by the City documenting after disposal of Maintenance & maintenance and repairs of equipment, vehicle or until Repair Records vehicles and other assets with a useful life administrative need generally more than five years. Includes the ends,whichever is following: fire hose records (such as test date, longer date previously tested, apparatus number, station number, hose diameter, conditions found, service date, defects corrected, etc.), annual ladder inspections and test results, tests done on SCBA's (including flow testing), etc. Vehicle maintenance records, inspections, pump testing and repair records of apparatus. Emergency medical equipment maintenance records used to verify regular maintenance of emergency medical equipment such as copies of contracts, maintenance schedules, test protocols, equipment inventory,performance test records, repair records, parts used and service reports. Per NFPA Standards 1901, 1961, 1852 and 1500. Fire & Security Records documenting the department's role in Permanent In perpetuity Alarm System issuing permits, testing and maintaining fire Records and security alarms, including fire alarm and sprinkler system plans. May include permits, applications, malfunction reports, maintenance reports, and related documents. 271Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Fire Fire and arson investigation case files, Permanent In perpetuity Investigation including investigative reports, witness Records statements, photographs, maps, correspondence, notes, video and audio recordings, copies of property releases, laboratory reports, and incident/injury reports. Hazardous Inspection records of underground and above Permanent In perpetuity Materials ground fuel storage tanks. Reports and Records investigation results of incidents including spills and leaks, etc. Historical Newspaper clippings and articles relating to Permanent In perpetuity Records the Meridian Fire Department,photos of events. Inspection Documents relating to fire code inspections Semipermanent 20 years records performed by the department, including inspections of home daycares and foster care homes, commercial buildings, and subdivisions. May include reports, notices, citations, occupancy and pre-fire planning records, floor plans, sketches, reports, lists, Tier II reports, and related documents. Buildings & Fire inspection records relating to buildings Temporary 3 years from date of Subdivisions— and subdivisions that have been demolished last inspection Demolished or or are otherwise no longer in existence (never No Longer in constructed). Existence (never constructed Juvenile Fire Case files related to juvenile fire setter Permanent In perpetuity Setter investigation, including investigative reports, Evaluations witness statements, photographs, maps, correspondence, notes, video and audio recordings, copies of property releases, laborato reports, incident/injury reports. Maps Maps and related records maintained by the Transitory Until record is department for address location, reference superseded and for tracking various trends. May include lists, books and other methods of address location. Meeting Final, approved Officer and Command Staff Semipermanent 5 years Minutes meeting minutes. Narcotics Narcotic inventory and usage- hard copy, Temporary 3 years Inventory& narcotics distributed to the engine companies. Usage National Fire National Fire Incident Reporting System Permanent In perpetuity Incident (NFIRS) Fire Incident Report, relating to fire Reports run, medical emergency, casualty, hazardous materials call, false alarm, good intent, or 28 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD service call. May include property release forms, civilian and fire service casualty reports, hazardous materials reports, etc. Patient Care Records related to patient care, refusal of Permanent In perpetuity Records care, denial of need for care, supplemental emergency medical services reports, diagnostic attachments to include ECG, care summary reports and vital sign reports. Plans, Records related to department operations, Transitory Until record is Protocols, including Medical Supervision Plan, standing superseded Guidelines, written orders, operational guidelines, Policies administrative and operational policies. Proof of Proof of worker's compensation and other Transitory Until record is Insurance insurance required for training tower usage by superseded other agencies. Public Records related to the design and Semipermanent 5 years Education implementation of educational and other Programs & outreach programs provided to the public by Publications the department. May include: class descriptions, instructional materials, course outlines, class enrollment and attendance records, reports, speeches, and publications. Public Record Public records requests and responses. Temporary 2 years after last Requests action Ride-Along Signed waivers for persons requesting a ride- Forms along with the department. Ride Along Temporary 2 years tracking records. Rural Fire All records of activities of the department or Permanent In perpetuity Protection other City departments as they relate to the District Records Meridian Rural Fire Protection District. May include: annual audits, land and apparatus acquisition records, records relating to construction of fire stations,bank statements, tax levy forms, Local Government Investment Pool statements, financial statements, annual budget records, legal notices, meeting minutes, election records, declarations of candidacy, election results, ICRMP insurance records, audio recordings of meetings. Structure Burn Records related to structure burns. Semipermanent 10 years Training Records Subpoena, Records including subpoenas for records Transitory Until administrative Duces Tecum or retained by the Fire Department(duces need ends Requiring tecum) or subpoenas requiring Fire De artment personnel to appear in court. 291Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Court Appearance HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Administrative Copies of administrative records including Transitory Until administrative Records A/P invoices, expense reports,professional need ends or record membership documents, etc. is superseded Affirmative Records documenting city compliance with Semipermanent 5 years from date of Action; Equal the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal IC§50-90 7(2)(g); request or personnel Employment Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 and 29 CFR action whichever is Opportunity the Americans with Disabilities Act. 1602,1602.14, later Commission Records include: plans, policy statements, 1620.32 Reports reports, investigations, case files and related information. Also includes EEO-4 reports submitted to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(EEOC) documenting compliance with EEOC requirements by cities with 15 or more employees. Benefits Records documenting notice to employees, Semipermanent 7 years after Continuation spouses and dependents informing them of IC§50-90 7(2)(g); employee their rights to continue insurance coverage 29 CFR 1627.3 separation, after termination or disability or family expiration of leave and whether coverage was elected or eligibility, or rejected. Continuation may be under completion of COBRA or another provision. Notice is also litigation,whichever sent to a third party administrator who is longest administers the extended coverage. Records may be filed with the Employee Benefits Records or Employee Personnel Records. Budget Prep Working documents utilized to build base Semipermanent 10 years Records budgets and establish yearly budgets; worksheets, enhancements, amendments, etc. Collective Records documenting negotiations between Temporary 3 years Bargaining the city and employee representatives, IC§50-90 7(3)(d); including contracts, reports, negotiation 29 CFR 516.5 notes, letters of agreement, arbitration findings, cost analyses, minutes, tape recordings, etc. Committee Agendas and meeting minutes/notes for Semipermanent 7 years Records special groups convened by HR forspecific 301Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD purposes such as Benefits, Compensation, and Wellness. Correspondence, Correspondence created or received in the Semipermanent 5 years Administrative course of administering City policies and programs. Correspondence, Correspondence regarding day-to-day office Transitory Until administrative Transitory operations and does not contain unique need ends information about City functions or programs. Databases Database records created and maintained for Transitory Until administrative the purposes of generating reports, data need ends or record files, and a variety of different outputs. is superseded Department HR guidelines, including but not limited to, Semipermanent 10 years from date Guidelines, Salary Administration Guidelines. guideline in its Policies, entirety, or any part Procedures, thereof, is officially Processes, and replaced, updated Reports City Standard Operating Policy/Procedure Semipermanent 20 years from date Manual. SOP Manual in its entirety, or any part thereof, is officially replaced, updated Records documenting and relating to HR Semipermanent 5 years from date processes, including but not limited to, HR process in its recruiting/interviewing processes. entirety or any part thereof, is officially replaced, updated Policies, reports, and documents regarding Semipermanent 10 years the internal department operations and procedures (e.g. Turnover, Recruiting reports, etc.). HR reports regarding department Semipermanent 10 years performance or other management presentations. Includes reports documenting trends, department or City performance in key areas as determined. Records that document the formulation, Transitory Until administrative adoption and implementation of internal need ends or record actions/decisions. is superseded Employee Benefits Records relating to city employee benefits Semipermanent 7 years after information such as: selection of insurance IC§§50-907(2)(g) employee plans, retirement,pension, and disability and 45-610; 29 separation, plans, deferred compensation plans, and CFR 1627.3; 29 expiration of other benefit information. Records may CFR 1602.31; eligibility, or include but are not limited to: plan selection IDAPA completion of and application forms, enrollment records, 09.01.35.081 litigation,whichever contribution and deduction summaries, is longest 311 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD personal data records, authorizations, beneficiary information, notices of disability payment made, and related documentation. Employee Medical Document an individual employee's Semipermanent 75 years after Records medical history. These records are not IC§§50-907(2)(g) employee personnel records and must be kept in a and 72-601; 29 separation, separate location from employee personnel CFR 1602.31; 29 expiration of records as required by the Americans with CFR 1910.1020 eligibility, or Disabilities Act. Records may include,but completion of are not limited to: medical exam records litigation,whichever (pre-employment,pre-assignment,periodic is longest or episodic), X-rays, and records of significant health or disability limitations. Employee Document of employee's work history. Semipermanent 5 years after Personnel Records Original employee personnel records are IC§§50-907(2)(g) employee kept by Human Resources Department and 45-610; 29 separation, unless otherwise specified. Records may CFR 1627.3; 29 expiration of include, but are not limited to: employment CFR 1602.31; eligibility, or applications, notices of appointment, IDAPA completion of training and certification records, records of 09.01.35.081 litigation, whichever health limitations, drug testing, salary is longest schedules, personal actions, performance evaluations, awards and other special recognition, letters of recommendation, investigation information, disciplinary action, notices of layoff, letters of resignation, home address and telephone, emergency notification forms, oaths of office, grievance and complaint records, and relate correspondence and documentation. (See also Employee Benefits Records, Employee Medical Records, Recruitment and Selection Records, and Volunteer Records). Notes: (1)Meridian Police Department employee personnel records including original Internal Affairs files and training materials are kept by the Police Department according to the Police Department Records Retention Schedule. Upon employee separation, these records shall be forwarded to Human Resources Department. 32 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD All other Police Department current employee original personnel records are kept by the Human Resources Department. (2)Meridian Fire Department employee personnel records including original training records and original records related to Union promotions are kept by the Fire Department. Upon employee separation these records shall be forwarded to Human Resources Department. All other Fire Department current employee original personnel records including ICRMP and BEST training records and Union member promotion applications and PAR forms documenting a promotion are kept by Human Resources Department. Employment Document to the U.S. Immigration and Temporary 3 years after date of Verification Naturalization Service that an applicant or IC§50-90 7(3)(d), hire or 1 year after (I-9) of Job employee is eligible to work in the U.S. 8 U.S.C. § employment is Applicants Information includes: employee information 1324a(b)(3) terminated, and verification data such as citizenship or (Immigration whichever is later alien status and signature, employer review Reform and and verification data such as documents, Control Act) which establish identity and eligibility, and employer's signature certifying that documents were checked. This category includes forms completed for all new hires, as superseded or previous forms completed on rehires. Forms Forms created for use by HR personnel to Transitory Until administrative facilitate work, including Performance need ends or record Review,job description template, PAR is superseded template, etc. Hazard Exposure Emergency response employees exhibiting Semipermanent 30 years after Records signs or symptoms possibly resulting from IC§50-90 7(2)(g); employee exposure to hazardous substances are 29 CFR 1910.1020 separation, required to be provided medical expiration of examination and consultation. Records eligibility, or include: employee's name and social completion of security number; physician's written litigation,whichever opinion, recommended limitations; results is longest of examinations and tests; employee medical complaints related to hazardous substance exposure; description of employee's duties as they relate to exposure; the employee's exposure levels or 331Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD anticipated exposure levels; description of protective equipment used; and information from previous medical examinations of the employee which is not readily available to h sician and other information. Insurance Records documenting plan descriptions and Semipermanent 10 years Policies/Plans: summaries of city insurance policies and Employee Group plans covering employee group health and Health and Life life benefits, including annual certification Benefits records. Kinds and Levels Records documenting the description, Temporary 3 years Chart, General classification and compensation of city jobs IC§50-90 7(3)(d); Employee or and positions. Usually includes details of 29 CFR Part 1602 Police Step Plan duties and responsibilities of each position and 29 CFR time percentage breakdowns of tasks, skills 1627.3 and abilities needed for each position, and related records documenting the development, modification or redefinition of each job or position. Leave Applications or requests submitted by city Temporary 3 years Applications employees for compensatory, family and IC§50-90 7(3)(d) medical leave, long term leave and other leave time. Information usually includes: employee name, department, date, leave dates requested, type of leave requested, and related data. These are not kept by Finance. Meeting Minutes Internal staff meeting records. Transitory Until administrative need ends or record is superseded Newsletters HR2You Newsletters. Transitory Until administrative need ends or record is superseded Organization HR Department Organization Charts. Transitory Until administrative Charts need ends or record is superseded Personnel Action Completed employee forms submitted to Semipermanent 5 years after (PAR) Forms HR upon initial hire,pay increase or IC§50-90 7(2)(g); employee decrease, change of address, or change of 29 CFR Part 1602 separation, supervisor. and 29 CFR expiration of 1627.3 eligibility, or completion of litigation,whichever is longest Photographs Photographs relating to HR Transitory Until administrative sponsored/conducted City events (e.g. need ends or record service awards, employee picnic, Wellness is superseded events, etc.). 341Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Photo Photographs and other records used to Transitory Until record is Identification identify city employees, private security superseded, obsolete personnel, contract workers and other. May or administrative include photographs taken by City for needs end identification or prox card or driver's license photocopy. Position Records documenting the description, Temporary 3 years Descriptions classification and compensation of city jobs IC§50-90 7(3)(d); and positions. Usually includes details of 29 CFR Part 1602 duties and responsibilities of each position and 29 CFR time percentage breakdowns of tasks, skills 1627.3 and abilities needed for each position, and related records documenting the development, modification or redefinition of each job or position. Presentations Formal departmental presentations to Semipermanent 5 years Council, other formal bodies. Public Records Public records requests and responses. Transitory 1 year after last Requests action Recruitment and Documents regarding the recruitment and Temporary 2 years Selection Records selection of city employees and contracted IC§5 0-90 7(3)(d); for Applicants who service providers such as attorneys, 29 CFR 1602.31; are Hired auditors, consultants, etc. Records may 29 CFR include, but are not limited to:job 162 7.3(b)(1)(vi) announcements and descriptions, applicant lists, applications and resumes, position advertisement records, civil service and other examination records, interview questions, interview and application scoring notes, applicant background investigation information, polygraph test results, letters of reference, civil service records, staffing requisition forms, certification of eligibles, recruitment file (job announcement, position description, documentation relating to the announcement and test, and test items and rating levels), and related correspondence and documentation. Meridian Police Department employee Temporary 2 years after original background investigation records separation are kept by the Police Department. Upon employee separation these original records shall be forwarded to the Human Resources Department for proper disposition. 351Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Meridian Fire Department Union original Temporary 2 years recruitment records including National Testing Network testing, application, and interview notes, for applicants who are hired, are kept by the Fire Department until the expiration of the retention period at which time they shall be properly destroyed by the Fire Department. Recruitment and Documents regarding the recruitment and Temporary 2 years Selection Records selection of city employees and contracted IC§50-90 7(3)(d); for Applicants who service providers such as attorneys, 29 CFR 1602.31; are Not Hired auditors, consultants, etc. Records may 29 CFR include, but are not limited to:job 162 7.3(b)(1)(vi) announcements and descriptions, applicant lists, applications and resumes, position advertisement records, civil service and other examination records, interview questions, interview and application scoring notes, applicant background investigation information, polygraph test results, letters of reference, civil service records, staffing requisition forms, certification of eligibles, recruitment file (job announcement, position description, documentation relating to the announcement and test, and test items and rating levels), and related correspondence and documentation. Meridian Fire Department Union original Temporary 2 years recruitment records including National Testing Network testing, application, and interview notes, for applicants who are not hired, are kept by the Fire Department until the expiration of the retention period at which time, they shall be properly destroyed b the Fire Department Resource Records including notebooks, meeting Transitory Until administrative Records/Notes notes, to-do-lists, employee-compiled notes, need ends or record etc. is superseded Special Projects Documents related to special, one-time Semipermanent 10 years projects to include, but not limited to, Employee Satisfaction Survey, Policy Review/Revision, Salary Structure Review. Surveys HR and other initiated internal surveys, Semipermanent 10 years survey results (e.g. Salary Surveys, Employee Satisfactions Surveys, Best Place to Work. Etc.). 36 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Telephone Message logs, voicemails, etc. Transitory Until administrative Records need ends Training Records related to the design and Semipermanent 5 years from final Programs/HR implementation of training programs IC§50-907(2)(g) presentation and/or provided to employees by the City. use Documents may include course descriptions, instructor certifications, instructional materials, course outlines, class enrollment and attendance records, tests, test results, and related records. Training/Travel Records documenting attendance and Semipermanent 5 years Records presentation by HR employees at conventions, conferences, seminars, workshops, and similar training events. Includes training/travel requests, training materials, reports and related correspondence. Payroll Records documenting claims submitted by Temporary 3 years Unemployment former city employees for unemployment IC§50-907(3)(d) Claims compensation. Usually includes: claims, notices, reports, and related records. May also include records generated by the appeal of claim determinations. These are received by HR and kept in HR. Wellness Program Records related to the management and administration of the Wellness Program including: • Wellness Challenges - Semipermanent 5 years Correspondence and other Challenge documentation. • Newsletters Transitory Until administrative need ends • Emails conveying general Transitory Until administrative information related to the Wellness need ends or Program including monthly approved for announcements related to upcoming destruction in challenges, challenge winners, accordance with the monthly Wellness events and 5-year citywide activities, etc. email records retention period) whichever is sooner • Wellness Committee Meeting Semipermanent 7 years Agendas and Minutes • Wellness Database—includes Transitory Until administrative information from Blue Cross for need ends employee point totals, information from employee sign-in sheets to 371Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD events (name, ID, signature), and employee tracking information to events/challenges (i.e., steps, exercise, weight, Bingo cards, pictures of employees, schedule for appointments (name, ID, date, time, email address, phone number)), and vendor contact information for events • Wellness Day Off—Incentive Semipermanent 75 years (retained in Verification Forms for Day Off accordance with Requests Employee Benefit records retention period) • Wellness Day Off—employee Transitory Until administrative timecard tracking records, along need ends with numbers of hours used • Wellness Hero Responses- Transitory Until administrative Correspondence and related records need ends Workers' Medical records related to job assignments Semipermanent 30 years after Compensation that document work-related injuries and employment Records and illnesses, including but not limited to, separation Claims hearing test records, hazard exposure records, first- aid incident records, physician statements, release consent forms and related correspondence, and records documenting claims submitted by city employees for work-related injuries and illnesses. These records are kept separate from employee personnel files. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (I.T.)DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Administrative Activity Daily, weekly monthly or other reports Transitory Until Logs/Reports documenting the activities of Information administrative Technology employees, including but not needs ends limited to: sign in/out sheet for keys, access logs and phone logs, minutes, project files and dashboard statistics. Administrative Copies of: A/P invoices, Expense Reports, Transitory Until Records MIP A/P unposted Reports, Transactions, administrative Internal Invoices, Purchase Orders, Detailed need ends or Statements of Revenues and Expenditures. 381 Page record is superseded Budget Preparation Working documents utilized to build base Transitory 1 year or until Records budgets and establish yearly budgets, Administrative including but not limited to enhancements, need ends amendments, carry forward support, FTE anticipation, vehicle replacement, quotes for service/maintenance. CorrespondencePolicy/program correspondence, Permanent In perpetuity documenting the formulation, adoption and implementation of significant policy/program decision. Records created or received in the course of Semipermanent 5 years administering city policies, procedures or programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy,procedure or program discussions or decisions. orrespondence created or received in the Transitory Until nurse of administering City policies, administrative procedures or programs including but not Need ends limited to memos, notes,thank you notes, surveys, letters to businesses and citizens and ay-to day office and housekeeping correspondence that does not contain unique information about City functions or programs, for example scrolling agenda and announcements. HR Documents Departmental employee personnel records, Transitory Until including but not limited to training records, employment is coaching notes,performance evaluations, terminated, customer feedback, contact information, etc. then forward to HR Meeting Records Internal meeting records and/or staff level Transitory Until and Notes notes generated in the course of day to day administrative business, including but not limited to need ends or agendas, notes and presentations. record is superseded Reference/Owner's Documents to include but not limited to Transitory Until record is Manuals/ owner's manuals and documentation. superseded or Handbooks administrative need ends Department Departmental Policy or program records Transitory 1 year after Guidelines, documenting the formulation, adoption and document is Policies, implementation of departmental policy or replaced and/or Procedures, program decisions. Including but not administrative Processes and limited to Standard Operating Procedures need ends Reports and Guidelines, reference materials or materials obtained from another 39 Page government entity or agency used in the development of said procedure. Department Reports prepared for the Mayor and City Transitory Until Reports Council. administrative need ends Operational Records Backup Files A copy on a disk based backup appliance of Transitory 3 months the contents of all data from the City servers. Service All customer support tickets opened in Semipermanent 10 years Management Tool service management systems. IC§50-907(2)(g) (other) Department Policies, reports, and documents regarding Semipermanent 5 years Policies and internal department operations and IC§50-907(2)€ Reports procedures, e.g. computer usage policy, (dept. report) password policy, service level goals, training materials, evaluations of materials. Disaster Recovery Strategy for retention and recovery of Transitory Until record is Plan network and information systems following superseded or network or server crash or failure. updated Instant Messages All messages sent or received by City staff Transitory Until using the City's electronic messaging overwritten by service system Internally- Programming statements or instructions that Transitory Until record is Generated Source create or execute a computer program. superseded or Code updated Internet History List of websites accessed on City computers Transitory 30 days and electronic devices. Inventory List of electronic devices held by City and Transitory Until record is Management software licensing information and superseded or specifications for each electronic device updated used by City. Outlook Meeting requests sent and received by Transitory Until deleted by Appointments employees via City email system; user appointments scheduled via City email system by employees. Outlook E-mail All e-mail messages, sent or received by Semipermanent 5 years Messages—City City staff using City's e-mail system. (E- IC§50-907(2)(g) Staff mail messages may be preserved elsewhere (other) in digital or paper format for longer periods of time as the subject matter of such messages may require.) Outlook Tasks and Tasks, task requests and reminders sent and Transitory 2 years Notes received by employees via City email system. Prox Card Access Register of which prox cards have accessed Transitory 90 days Records a restricted area. 401Page Security Camera Video footage from security cameras Transitory Until Footage mounted on and in city facilities. overwritten by system Call Records List of incoming and outgoing calls, Transitory 90 days including phone numbers and caller identification, as available. Voicemail Incoming verbal messages recorded on City Transitory Until deleted by Messages voicemail systems. user Geographic Aerial photographs of properties within the Permanent In perpetuity Information City. Including drone imagery. Systems,Digital Orthophotography Images Geographic Points, lines, and polygons; Transitory Until Information including attributes, tables, views, metadata superseded Systems, GIS Data and other spatial information relating to infrastructure, boundaries, etc. that the City owns or maintains. Geographic A visual representation of data within a Transitory Until Information particular geographical area. Also includes administrative Systems, Maps maps and data provided by outside agencies need ends including edge of pavement,parcels, roads, and others. MAYOR'S OFFICE RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Administrative Records Correspondence Policy/program correspondence created Semipermanent 5 years or received, documenting the formulation, adoption and implementation of significant policy/program decision. May include correspondence with other government agencies. Correspondence created or received in Semipermanent 5 years the course of administering city policies/programs, but these records do not provide insight into significant policy/program discussions or decisions. May include citizen response letters, letters to homeowner associations and businesses. Correspondence created or received Transitory Until which is not unique to City functions or administrative Need ends 411 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD programs. May include; thank you notes, invitations, and general mail. Customer Complaint or compliment records Transitory Until Complaints/Kudos including but not limited to emails and administrative comment cards. need ends Forms/Templates Forms/Templates created for use by the Transitory Until Mayor's Office including but not administrative limited to visual aids, applications, need ends or checklists, and web documents. record is superseded HR Documents Departmental employee personnel Transitory Until employment records, including but not limited to is terminated; then training records, coaching notes, forward to HR Performance Evaluation, contact information. File sent to HR for retention after termination(voluntary or involuntary). Meeting Records Internal meeting records and/or staff Transitory Until and Notes level notes generated in the course of administrative Special day to day business, including but not need ends or Projects/Initiatives limited to; agendas, notes and record is presentations. superseded Department Departmental Policy or program Transitory I year after Guidelines, records documenting the formulation, document is Policies, adoption and implementation of replaced and/or Procedures, departmental policy or program administrative Processes and decisions. Including but not limited to need ends Reports Standard Operating Procedures and Guidelines, reference materials or materials obtained from another government entity or agency used in the development of said procedure. Presentations Formal department presentations to Transitory Until Council, Community Groups or other administrative agencies/entities or people, e.g. need ends strategic update and new council member training. Telephone Records Message logs, voicemails, Transitory Until ShoreTel/Mitel call volume reports etc. administrative need ends Economic Develo ment Confidentiality Documents, related to signed Transitory Until Agreement Projects confidentiality agreements, including, administrative and but not limited to letters of intent, need ends Correspondence/ community Tax Reinvestment Documents Incentive (TRI) match letter, market 421Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD research,project prospectus,photos, and written correspondence. Economic Develo ment -Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Plans and Reports Plans, reports, substantial plan Permanent In perpetuity amendments, and related correspondence. Subrecipient Documents, including, but not limited Semi-permanent 5 years from the Agreements and to agreements, Consolidated Annual completion of a Supporting Performance Evaluation Report program year's Documents (CAPER), sub-recipient agreements, HUD approved environmental review records, PSAs CAPER (and corresponding products), sub- recipient reporting documents (activity reports, draw requests, labor files), etc. Operational Records Agendas & Agendas and minutes of Director Semipermanent 5 years Minutes Meetings, Operational Meetings, Mayor's Youth Advisory Council, Mayor's Senior Advisory Board, and Faith Ambassador Council Meetings. Annual Reports Report on City's and Mayor's Office Permanent In perpetuity activities over preceding year summarizing activities and financial performance. Applications Forms and materials submitted with Semipermanent 5 years application for positions or awards administered by Mayor's Office, including applications for scholarships, Promise partners, Mayor's Youth Advisory Council, volunteer positions, City commissions, and City committees or task forces. Attendance Sheets Sign-in sheets, where offered, for Transitory Until activities and events hosted by the administrative Mayor's Office. needs ends News Releases A written or recorded record directed at Semipermanent 5 years members of the news media for the purpose of making a newsworthy announcement. Photos Published photographs taken, owned, Permanent In perpetuity or stored by the Mayor's Office. Non-published photographs not used or Transitory Until needed for a particular purpose. administrative need ends 431Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Proclamations Proclamations issued by the Mayor not Semipermanent 5 years read at City Council meetings. Proclamations issued by the Mayor and Transitory Until read at City Council meetings. administrative need ends Publications Informational or promotional Semipermanent 5 years publications of the Mayor's office, including newsletters, flyers, marketing materials, brochures, program materials. Public Addresses Speech, news release and video records Permanent In perpetuity relating to State of the City addresses. Published records relating addresses, Semipermanent 5 years speeches or podcasts. May include script, video, PowerPoint,program, agenda, photos. Special Projects Documents related to special or one- Semipermanent 10 years time projects. Documents related to specific Strategic Transitory Until Plans including tools, databases, and administrative working products. need ends Talking Points Records prepared to summarize issues Transitory Until in preparation for discussion with the administrative public or media. need ends PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Activity Logs/Reports Daily, weekly, monthly, or other Transitory Until reports documenting the activities administrative of the Parks and Recreation need ends Department employees, including but not limited to: sign in/out sheet for credit card,key log. Lost &Found log sheets Transitory Until documenting items that have been administrative lost and found by citizens in the need ends arks and other MPR facilities. Administrative Copies of A/P invoices, Expense Transitory Until Records Reports, Detailed Statements of administrative Revenues and Expenditures, need ends Capital Improvements Plan, Parks &Recreation Facilities 441Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Depreciation Schedule, MPR Communications Plan, and other related documents. Agendas & Minutes— Agendas and minutes of monthly Semipermanent 5 years Staff Meetings MPR all-staff meetings. IC§50-907(2)(g) Agreements and Agreements signed by City staff Temporary 2 years after Contracts (not by Council). IC§50-907(3)(d) expiration or termination of agreement Budget Preparation Working documents utilized to Transitory Until Records build base budgets and establish administrative yearly budgets, including but not need ends limited to enhancements, amendments, carry forward support, FTE anticipation, vehicle replacement, and quotes for service/maintenance. Camp Registration Records regarding camp Semipermanent 25 years (kept Records registration. IC§50-907(2)(g) in Recl) Camper Profile Child profile sheets and sign in Transitory At conclusion Sheets and Sign-in sheets. of camp season Sheets Concessionaires' Central District Health food safety Temporary 2 years Health Department certifications and permits IC§50-907(3)(d) Records submitted by concessionaire. Correspondence Correspondence created or Semipermanent 5 years received in the course of IC§50-907(2)(g) administering City policies, procedures or programs including but not limited to memos, transmittals, notes, comments, thank you notes, letters to businesses and day-to day office and housekeeping correspondence. Committee Records Agendas, meeting minutes/notes, Semipermanent 5 years and audio recordings of ad hoc IC§50-907(2)(g) groups convened by Parks & Recreation for specific purposes (e.g., Christmas in Meridian). Employee files Certifications, disciplinary reports, Semipermanent 5 years (then performance evaluations, IC§50-907(2)(g) transferred to comment cards, complaints, HR) kudos, awards, etc. regarding employees and lifeguards. 451Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Internal Department Administrative SOPS, policies, Transitory Until Guidelines, Standard processes. administrative Operating need ends Procedures, Policies, Processes External Guidelines, Director's orders and policies Temporary 2 years Policies,Director's pertaining to external customers, IC§50-907(3)(d) Orders facilities, recreation classes, camps, special events, and sports (e.g., Lost& Found, Metal Detecting, Recreational Instructor Policy, Registrations &Refunds, Sports League Bylaws, Partnerships Between Private or Public Entities, Hot Air Balloons). Employee Time Logs Completed logs of employees' Semipermanent 5 years and Reports timesheets, tasks, and location; IC§50-907(2)(g) reports and analysis of related data. Facility Improvement Plans and specifications related to Semipermanent 10 years Plans remodel and improvement of MPR IC§50-907(2)(c) buildings and facilities. Facility Reservations Materials related to reservation of Semipermanent 25 years (kept facilities and equipment(e.g., IC§50-907(2)(g) in Rec 1) shelters; tennis, pickleball, and basketball courts; multiuse and baseball/ softball fields; cornhole boards). Financial Aid Completed application forms and Temporary 2 years Applications materials submitted to request IC§50-907(3)(d) financial assistance for children's class or program (e.g., Care Enough to Share). Forms/Templates Forms/templates created for use Transitory Until by the Parks and Recreation administrative Department. need ends Grounds Pesticide spray records, Temporary 3 years Maintenance Records playground inspection records. IC§50-907(3)(d) IDAPA 02.03.03.100.05 Historical Records Records found inside opened time Permanent In perpetuity capsules. IC§50-907(1)(h) Annual newsletters prepared by Permanent In perpetuity Parks & Recreation Department IC§50-907(1)(h) highlighting construction projects, 46 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD park dedications, and other efforts and initiatives. Copies of MPR Department Permanent In perpetuity Annual Reports provided to the IC§50-907(1)(h) Mayor's Office in conjunction with the State of the City Address. External awards,plaques, and Permanent In perpetuity certificates bestowed upon the IC§50-907(1)(h) MPR Department. MPR Department Dashboards Permanent In perpetuity which document statistical data by IC§50-907(1)(h) year. Parks &Recreation Master Plan; Permanent In perpetuity Pathways Master Plan; Golf IC§50-907(1)(h) Course Master Planning Report. Park dedication plaque mock-ups Permanent In perpetuity detailing the dedication date, IC§50-907(1)(h) Mayor, City Council, MPR Commission, MPR staff, and other volunteers and contributors. Photographs, newspaper and news Permanent In perpetuity channel articles and clippings, IC§50-907(1)(h) press releases, and videos relating to Parks and Recreation Department. Homecourt Records regarding Homecourt Temporary 2 years Membership Records membership registration, IC§50-907(3)(d) including, e.g., waiver, financial information, daily sign-in logs. Incident or Accident Records regarding incidents, Temporary 2 years Reports injuries, accidents, rescues, or IC§50-907(3)(d) other staff actions, incurred during or related to a department- sponsored or department-provided class, camp, program, reservation, or activity. Marketing Materials Informational or promotional Transitory Until publications of the Parks & administrative Recreation Department, including need ends flyers, brochures,program materials, PowerPoint and Prezi resentations, and videos. Memorial Forms Completed citizen forms Semipermanent 75 years requesting memorial in MPR IC§50-907(2)(g) facility under established memorial program(e.g. 471Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Generations Plaza Brick Sales form, Kleiner Park Memorial Tree Plaza Paver Sales, Memorial Tree Program form). Meeting Records and Agendas and minutes of monthly Semipermanent 5 years Notes MPR all-staff meetings. IC§50-907(2)(g) Other internal meeting records and Transitory Until notes generated in the course of administrative day-to-day business, including but need ends not limited to agendas, notes, and presentations. MPR Commission Copies of Commission and Transitory Until Records (copies) Committee agendas records. administrative need ends Copies of bylaws. Transitory Until administrative need ends Copies of contact information Transitory Until listing Commission members' administrative names, addresses, phone numbers, need ends email addresses, etc. Copies of correspondence Transitory Until regarding day-to-day operations or administrative administration. need ends Copies of project records Transitory Until documenting historical or cultural administrative significance to the City and/or need ends Meridian community. Copies of project files and reports Transitory Until used by MPR staff, Commission, administrative Committee in the course of need ends researching, developing, completing, reporting on, or acting on initiatives of the Commission/Committee. Copies of roster listing current Transitory Until Commission members, including administrative names, seat numbers, and need ends appointment dates. Permits Materials related to permit Semipermanent 5 years applications and permits issued by IC§50-907(2)(g) MPR(e.g., amplified sound permits, short-term concession permits). 48 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Recreation Class/ Materials related to registration for Semipermanent 25 years Activity Registration a recreation class or activity. IC§50-907(2)(g) (kept in Recl) Project Files Copies of records regarding park, Transitory Until pathway, and other projects and administrative initiatives. need ends Reference/Owner's Instruction documents, including Transitory Until Manuals/Books those for equipment and administrative electronics. need ends Santa Letters Correspondence created or Transitory Until received in the course of administrative administering the Letters to Santa need ends program. Special Event Records related to MPR-sponsored Semipermanent 75 years Records special events, including vendor IC§50-907(2)(g) and sponsor contracts and entries, Trunk or Treat trunk entries, parade float entries. Payment Materials related to customer Semipermanent 25 years Records payment for MPR services e.g., IC§50-907(2)(g) (kept in Recl) special event applications, vendors, sponsors, registration, permit applications, memorials, sports league registration, recreation class registration, camp re istration, swim lessons. Sports Schedules and Records of games played and final Semipermanent Until Scores scores. IC§50-907(2)(g) Administrative Need Ends Surveys Internal and external outreach Semipermanent 10 years surveys and results. IC§50-907(2)(g) Team Rosters and Record of all individuals Temporary 2 years Registration Forms registered for a sports team. IC§50-907(3)(d) Telephone Records Message logs. Transitory Until administrative need ends Time Capsule Records regarding location and Temporary 2 years after Content Information contents of time capsules that have IC§50-907(3)(d) time capsule is not been o ened. opened Tree Abatement Case Records related to nuisance tree Temporary 2 years Files abatement as ordered by City IC§50-907(3)(d) Arborist. Tree Inventory Inventory of all public trees Permanent In perpetuity maintained by City Arborist. IC§50-907(1)(h) 491Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Vandalism & Copies of records related to park, Transitory Until Restitution Records pathway, and facility vandalism administrative incidents and restitution, including need ends but not limited to property damage reports, etc. Volunteer Records Applications, timesheets, and Transitory Until other biographical notes related to administrative City volunteers, including Park need ends Ambassadors, scouts, and other civic groups. These records also include records documenting the activities and administration of volunteer programs in city hall and records documenting work performed for the City by citizens without compensation for their services. May include volunteer application forms, volunteer and emergency contact information, agreements, applications, skills test results, training documentation, task assignments, monitoring records,volunteer hour statistics, volunteer program publicity records, insurance information, inactive volunteer files, and related records. Lakeview Golf Course Golf Cart Records regarding maintenance of Temporary 2 years Maintenance Records golf carts. IC§50-907(3)(d) Golf Course Annual Records related to annual pass Temporary 2 years Passes registration and issuance, IC§50-907(3)(d) including, e.g., waiver, contact and financial information. Golf Course Pesticide, herbicide, and fertilizer Temporary 3 years Fertilizer and spray records. IC§50-907(3)(d) Pesticide Records IDAPA 02.03.03.100.05 Golf Course Payment Materials related to customer Semipermanent 25 years (kept Records accounts and payments for LGC IC§50-907(2)(g) in ForeUp) goods and services. Pro Shop Inventory Records related to inventory held Transitory Until by LGC pro shop. administrative need ends 501Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Tournament Tournament application form and Temporary 2 years Applications related materials, including IC§50-907(3)(d) waiver, proof of insurance, etc. Community Swimming Pool Chemical Test Logs Records of water chemical level Temporary 2 years testing erformed by pool staff. IC§50-90 7 3 d Chemical Test Records of automatic chemical Semipermanent 5 years reports tests performed by chemical IC§50-907(2)(g) automation system and emailed to MPR staff. Swim Team Waiver Completed waivers submitted by Temporary 2 years Forms individual swim team members. IC§50-90 7 3 d Pool Operation License(s)to operate pool issued Temporary 2 years License by Central District Health. IC§50-90 7 3 d Lifeguard Schedules Lifeguard schedule and Semipermanent 25 years and Timesheets timesheets, contact information. IC§50-907(2)(g) (kept in WhenIWork) Arts and Culture Coordinator Initial Point Gallery Calls for Artists requesting Permanent In perpetuity Records applications for artists who wish IC§50-907(1)(h) to exhibit their work in IPG. Yearly schedule of IPG shows. Permanent In perpetuity IC§50-907(1)(h) Records regarding applicants Permanent In perpetuity selected for exhibition of work in IC§50-907(1)(h) IPG. Records regarding applicants not Temporary 2 years selected for exhibition of work in IC§50-907(3)(d) IPG. Artists' price lists and labels for Transitory Until each piece. administrative need ends Promotional materials promoting Permanent In perpetuity IPG exhibits, e.g., posters, flyers. IC§50-907(1)(h) Permission forms allowing display Temporary 2 years of work by minor artists in IPG. IC§50-907(3)(d) Opening reception attendance Permanent In perpetuity records. IC§50-907(1)(h) IPG visitor sign-in sheets. Temporary 2 years IC§50-907(3)(d) Information regarding function Transitory Until item is no and origin of gallery equipment longer used and furnishings, e.g., hook and rail system, display cases. 51 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Show set-up and tear-down Transitory Until guidelines. administrative need ends POLICE DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Activity reports Daily, weekly, monthly or other Semipermanent 5 years reports documenting the activities of Idaho Code§ employees, including: type of activity, 50-907(2)(e) employees involved, time spent on activity, work completed, equipment used, etc. May include Education & Prevention Training reports. Administrative Administrative records including Transitory 1 year records proxy card check out list,vehicle check out log, visitor log, etc. Asset Forfeiture Documentation pertaining to the Semipermanent 5 years after closure Records seizure process and obtaining approval (Idaho Code of case through the courts section 50- 907(2)(a)) Briefing records Records documenting internal Transitory Until administrative communications between supervisors need ends and shift workers or between staff on different shifts to alert them to problems, issues or activities. Records may include,but not limited to: briefing logs, ILETS/NCIC messages, and bulletins from other agencies. Bulletins from Records including bulletins, circulars, Transitory Until administrative other agencies and related records received from need ends federal, state and local law enforcement agencies. Usually contains descriptions and photographs of fugitives, missing persons, stolen property, etc. Code enforcement Records created by code enforcement Semi- 75 Years Incident Notes" officers to document a violation or permanent investigation into a suspected 2012-2019 violation of city ordinance in Accella. Idaho Code§ 50-907(2)() Code Enforcement Records created by code enforcement Semi- 5 Years Incident Notes" officers to document a violation or permanent investigation into a suspected 2020—Present violation of city ordinance that do not 521Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD become a DR in case management Idaho Code§ module of ITS. 50-907(2)(g) Community service Records relating to police community Transitory Until administrative and outreach service programs. Records may programs include: publications, mailing lists, plans, evaluations, notes, reports, lesson plans and outlines, etc. Crime analysis Records documenting police efforts to Semipermanent 5 years statistics anticipate, prevent, or monitor IC§50- criminal activity. May include 907(2)(g) statistical summaries of crime patterns, modes of operation, analysis of particular crimes, criminal profiles, forecasts, movements of known offenders, etc. Crime reports Reports documenting a suicide, Semipermanent Prosecuted cases: (DRs) for Suicides, unattended death and/or criminal IC§50- 100 years after final Unattended Deaths, offense and actions taken, including 907(2)(e) disposition and Major Crimes charges or arrests. Record typically includes location of occurrence, date Non-prosecuted cases: (Including and time, handling officer, involved 100 years after date of Homicide Offenses, parties (suspects, victims, witnesses, last investigative Human reporting parties, etc.) and their action Trafficking, personal information, summary of Kidnapping/Abduc events and supportive documents (e.g., tion, Sex Offenses, probable cause statements, witness and Terrorism) statements, runaway forms, release of custody forms (juveniles), documents provided by citizens and victims, citations,property invoices, release of property forms, etc.). May include polygraph records (e.g.,pre- examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis reports, results charts, conclusions, interviewee statements, related information);property and evidence control and disposition records (e.g., evidence photographs, receipt forms, evidence logs, property reports, destruction lists,property consignment sheets, seized firearm logs, homicide evidence inventories, etc.); and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on 53 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD informants' activities and related records). Crime Reports Reports documenting a felony offense Semipermanent Prosecuted cases: (DRs) for Group A and actions taken, including charges IC§50- 10 years after final Felony Offenses or arrests. Record typically includes 907(2)(g) disposition location of occurrence, date and time, (Including Animal handling officer, involved parties Non-prosecuted cases: Cruelty,Arson, (suspects, victims, witnesses, 10 years after date of Assault Offenses, reporting parties, etc.) and their last investigative Bribery, personal information, summary of action Burglary/Breaking events and supportive documents (e.g., & Entering, probable cause statements, witness Commerce statements, tow slips, administrative Violations, license suspension forms, intoxilyzer Counterfeiting/For slips,field sobriety tests forms, gery, runaway forms, release of custody Destruction/Damag forms (juveniles), criminal e/Vandalism of background information Property, (ILETS/Triple III,Ada LE Lookup, Drug/Narcotic ISTARS, JDOC), documents Offenses, provided by citizens and victims, Embezzlement, citations,property invoices, release of Espionage, property forms,Leads Online Extortion/Blackmai printouts, shoplifting reports from 1,Fraud Offenses, store security officers, etc.). May Fugitive Offenses, include polygraph records (pre- Gambling, examination records, questions, Immigration statements of consent, analysis Violations, reports, results charts, conclusions, Larceny/Theft interviewee statements, related Offenses, Motor information), abandoned vehicle Vehicle Theft, reports,found property records, Pornography/Obsc traffic collision reports,property and ene Material, evidence control and disposition Prostitution records (e.g., evidence photographs, Offenses, Robbery, receipt forms, evidence logs,property Stolen Property reports, destruction lists,property Offenses, Treason, consignment sheets, seized firearm and Weapon Law logs, homicide evidence inventories, Violations) etc.), and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants' activities and related records). Crime reports Reports documenting a criminal Semipermanent Prosecuted cases: (DRs) for Group A offense and actions taken, including 541Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Misdemeanor charges or arrests. Record typically IC§50- 5 years after final Offenses and includes location of occurrence, date 907(2)(g) disposition Group B Offenses and time, handling officer, involved parties (suspects, victims,witnesses, (Including Bad reporting parties, etc.) and their Checks, Bond personal information, summary of Non-prosecuted cases: Default, events and supportive documents (e.g., 5 years after date of Curfew/Loitering/V probable cause statements, witness last investigative agrancy Violations, statements, tow slips, administrative action Disorderly license suspension forms, intoxilyzer Conduct, Driving slips,field sobriety tests forms, Under the runaway forms, release of custody Influence, forms (juveniles), criminal Drunkenness, background information Family Offenses (ILETS/Triple III,Ada LE Lookup, Nonviolent, Federal ISTARS, JDOC), documents Resource Violation, provided by citizens and victims, Liquor Law citations,property invoices, release of Violations, Peeping property forms,Leads Online Tom, Perjury, printouts, shoplifting reports from Trespass of Real store security officers, etc.). May Property,All Other include polygraph records (pre- Offenses) examination records, questions, Code enforcement statements of consent, analysis offences (eg. UDC, reports, results charts, conclusions, nuisance, parking, interviewee statements, related vehicle impound) information), abandoned vehicle reports,found property records, traffic collision reports,property and evidence control and disposition records (e.g., evidence photographs, receipt forms, evidence logs,property reports, destruction lists,property consignment sheets, seized firearm logs, homicide evidence inventories, etc.), and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants' activities and related records). Citations Police department copy of citations Temporary 2 Years (Misdemeanor and issued for traffic violations not Infraction) for associated with a crime report. Record IC§50- Other Crimes typically includes date and time, 907(3)(d) location of offense, vehicle license 551Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD plate information, code violation number, and issuing officer. Criminal history Records obtained via ILETS or local Transitory Until administrative records or jail systems (Ada LE Lookup)that need ends ILETS/NCIC provides information on the reports" accumulated criminal arrest and conviction history of an individual which may be useful in an investigation. May include summary sheet, arrest record, fingerprint information, mug shot, name, aliases, residence, sex age, date and place of birth, height, weight, hair and eye color, scars, marks, tattoos, abnormalities, date of arrest, offense committed. Digital media— Digital media attached to a crime Semipermanent Prosecuted cases: Type 1 (Associated report for a major crime. Includes IC§50- 100 years after final with Major Crimes video, audio, or other digital content 907(2)(g) disposition Reports, created by a law enforcement officer Non-prosecuted cases: Unattended Deaths, in the course of an investigation or 100 years after date of and Suicides) response and attached to a crime last investigative report for Major crimes including action Homicide Offenses, Human Trafficking, Kidnapping/Abduction, Sex Offenses, and Terrorism Digital media— Digital media attached to a crime Semipermanent Group A Prosecuted Type 2 (Associated report other than a major crime. IC§50- Cases: with Group A and Includes video, audio, or other digital 907(2)(g) B Reports) content created by a law enforcement 10 years after final officer in the course of an disposition investigation or response and attached Non- to a crime report for a crime other than Group ANon- Prosecuted Cases: a major crime. 10 years after date of last investigative action Group B Prosecuted Cases: 5 years after final disposition 56 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Group B Non- Prosecuted Cases: 5 years after date of last investigative action Digital media— Digital media attached to a Transitory Prosecuted cases: Type 3 (Associated misdemeanor or infraction citation. with Traffic Includes video, audio, or other digital 2 years after final Citations) content created by a law enforcement disposition officer in the course of an Non-prosecuted cases: investigation or response and attached to a citation for a misdemeanor crime 2 years after date of or infraction. last investigative action Prosecuted infraction cases: 210 days after final disposition Non-prosecuted infraction cases: 210 days after investi ative action Digital media— Digital media not attached to a crime Transitory 210 days Type 4* report or where no enforcement action was taken. Includes video, audio, or other digital content created by a law enforcement officer not attached to a crime report. Digital media— Digital media related to an officer Temporary 2 years Type 5* complaint. Includes video, audio, or IC§50- other digital content created by a law 907(3)(d) enforcement officer in the course of an investigation or response relevant to a complaint about such response or officer. *Where record is embedded with a crime report(DR), it shall be retained according to the retention period established for the crime report. Digital media— Digital media recorded in error. Transitory Until administrative recorded in error Includes video, audio, or other digital need ends content created by a law enforcement officer unrelated to an investigation or response. Field interview An informational document written by Semipermanent 5 years reports (FI cards) police officers relating to individuals, IC§50- events, or vehicles for which the 907(2)(g) 571Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD officer does not have probable cause for enforcement. Typically includes name and current address of person contacted,physical description of person or vehicle, officer's name, location of contact, date and time, reason for contact, etc. Grant records Applications and required reporting Semipermanent 10 years after grant documents for grants to support law Idaho Code § closeout enforcement initiatives and 50-907(2)(g) programming (e.g., crime prevention, substance abuse programs, criminal justice, SWAT). Gun dealers' sales Records documenting purchases of Transitory Until background records guns from dealers. May include check is completed duplicate register sheets mailed by the and administrative dealer to MPD and triplicate register need ends sheets mailed by the dealer to ISP for criminal records checks and forwarded to MPD. May include sheet number, sales person, date and time, city, serial number, make, model, caliber, purchaser's information, and signatures. Health & Welfare Referrals of suspected child abuse, Semipermanent 5 years from closure Referrals adult abuse and daycare complaints. IC§50- of referral or case. APS & Daycare 907(2)(g complaints Informant case files Records documenting information Transitory Until administrative not attached to about informants used by department. need ends crime report" personnel. Records typically include reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants' activities and related records. Internal affairs files Records documenting department's Semipermanent 75 years after investigation of an officer's role in an IC§§50- employee separation incident for the purpose of evaluating 907(2)(g) and or completion of compliance with department policy 45-610; 29 CFR related litigation, and professional standards. Records 1627.3; 29 CFR whichever is longest typically include investigative 1602.31 materials (video and audio recordings, written statements, narratives, analysis),polygraph records (pre- examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis 58 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD reports, results charts, conclusions, interviewee statements, related information), and recommended disciplinary actions, if any. Intoxilyzer 5000en, Factory and State of Idaho certificates Temporary 3 years after Draeger 9510 and for instrument; log of each person that IC§50- certificate has been LifeLoc instrument takes the breathalyzer test and 907(3)(d) and issued records verification testing. May include IDAPA suspect name, date, time, results, 11.03.01.013.06 operator name, calibration check results, simulated temperature in range, comments, etc. Intoxilyzer User certification cards and class Transitory Until administrative 5000EN,LifeLoc roster for Meridian police officers. need ends FC20, and Draeger Intoxilyzer instructor replaces with 9510 user each new certification period. certifications and class roster Local Records Local records check of police contacts Transitory 1 year after Check/ requested by OPM, FBI or military for submission to Backgrounds their employment purposes. requestor Master name index Information on individuals who are Semipermanent 100 years records field interviewed, individuals who are IC§50- arrested, suspects or accomplices in 907(2)(g) crimes, victims, complainants, and witnesses to incidents. Information typically includes name, address, date of birth, race, sex, date and time of incident or contact, case number (DR#), citation numbers and other identifying data. Multiple Firearms Background applications for multiple Transitory Immediately after Backgrounds firearm purchase requests. 18 U.S.C. § completion 922(t)(2)(C); 28 CFR§25.9(d) Parking citations Police department copy of citations Transitory 6 months after final issued for parking violations. Record disposition typically includes date and time, location of offense, vehicle license plate information, code violation number, and issuing officer. (Parking citations that are paid are sent to City Hall Finance Department. Parking citations that are unpaid and lead to court summons are sent to the City Prosecutor's office.) 591Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Photo identification Records with photos used to identify Transitory Until administrative records employees,private security personnel, need ends contract workers, etc. May include photos taken for employee identification cards, prox cards, etc. Public records Written public records requests, Transitory 1 year after response requests of any and responses, records provided, and provided all records not original (unredacted)records. associated to a Major Crime DR Public records Written public records requests, Semipermanent Record to be retained requests of records responses, records provided, and IC§50- based upon the associated to a original (unredacted)records 907(2)(g) retention of the Major Crime DR pertaining to a crime DR that falls original Crime DR under the Category of Crime reports file. (DRs) for Suicides, Unattended Deaths, and Major Crimes (murder, involuntary manslaughter, rape, sexual abuse of a child, terrorism). Radar equipment, Records documenting the calibration Temporary 3 years after certifications, and and maintenance of radar equipment IC§50- equipment retirement maintenance that may be useful in documenting the 907(3)(d) records accuracy of the readings. Often includes original factory certification of calibration. Information relating to maintenance and repair may include a description of the work completed, parts used, date of service, equipment number, make, model, etc. Training materials Records related to training programs Semipermanent 5 years from final provided to MPD personnel by IC§50- presentation and/or presenters including City employees, 907(2)(g) use contractors, or other presenters. May include course descriptions, instructor certifications, instructional materials, course outlines and handouts, and attendance records. Vacation watch Records documenting inspection of Transitory Until administrative forms properties when the owner/occupant is need ends away. May include name, address, date requested, vacation beginning and ending time, emergency contact information, special conditions, date and time officers check the property, etc. 601Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Victim Witness Notations and documents Semipermanent 20 years after System documenting contact with victims and IC§50- investigation closure witnesses. 907(2)(g) or disposition of case, whichever is later Written warnings Written notice provided by MPD Semipermanent 2 years officer to member of the public to IC§50- bring attention to a potential or actual 907(2)(g) violation. * Note: Where record is used for legal, training, or purposes other than those enumerated in retention period, that record shall be retained according to the retention period established for other records similarly used. ** Note:Where record is embedded with a crime report(DR), it shall be retained according to the retention period established for the crime report. RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Activity reports Daily, weekly, monthly or other Semipermanent Destroy records reports documenting the activities of Idaho Code§ dated on or before employees, including: type of activity, 50-907(2)(e) December 31, 2018 employees involved, time spent on activity, work completed, equipment used, etc. May include Education & Prevention Training reports. Code enforcement Records created by code enforcement Semi- Destroy records Incident Notes" officers to document a violation or permanent dated on or before investigation into a suspected December 31, 1948 2012-2019 violation of city ordinance in Accella. Idaho Code) 50-907(2)(g) Code Enforcement Records created by code enforcement Semi- Destroy records Incident Notes" officers to document a violation or permanent dated on or before investigation into a suspected December 31, 2018 2020—Present violation of city ordinance that do not Idaho Code§ become a DR in case management 50-907(2)(g) module of ITS. Crime analysis Records documenting police efforts to Semipermanent Destroy records statistics anticipate, prevent, or monitor IC§50- dated on or before criminal activity. May include 907(2)(g) December 31, 2018 statistical summaries of crime patterns, modes of operation, analysis of particular crimes, criminal profiles, forecasts, movements of known offenders, etc. Crime reports Reports documenting a suicide, Semipermanent Destroy records of (DRs) for Suicides, unattended death and/or criminal IC§50- prosecuted cases Unattended Deaths, offense and actions taken, including 907(2)(e) where final and Major Crimes charges or arrests. Record typically disposition was includes location of occurrence, date complete on or and time, handling officer, involved 611 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD (Including parties (suspects, victims,witnesses, before December 31, Homicide Offenses, reporting parties, etc.) and their 1923 Human personal information, summary of Trafficking, events and supportive documents (e.g., Destroy records of Kidnapping/Abduc probable cause statements, witness non-prosecuted cases tion, Sex Offenses, statements, runaway forms, release of where last and Terrorism) custody forms (juveniles), documents investigative action provided by citizens and victims, was on or before citations,property invoices, release of December 31, 1923 property forms, etc.). May include polygraph records (e.g.,pre- examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis reports, results charts, conclusions, interviewee statements, related information);property and evidence control and disposition records (e.g., evidence photographs, receipt forms, evidence logs, property reports, destruction lists,property consignment sheets, seized firearm logs, homicide evidence inventories, etc.); and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants' activities and related records). Crime Reports Reports documenting a felony offense Semipermanent Destroy records (DRs) for Group A and actions taken, including charges IC§50- related to prosecuted Felony Offenses or arrests. Record typically includes 907(2)(g) cases where final location of occurrence, date and time, disposition is dated (Including Animal handling officer, involved parties on or before Cruelty,Arson, (suspects, victims,witnesses, December 31, 2013 Assault Offenses, reporting parties, etc.) and their Bribery, personal information, summary of Destroy records Burglary/Breaking events and supportive documents (e.g., related to non- & Entering, probable cause statements, witness prosecuted cases Commerce statements, tow slips, administrative where last Violations, license suspension forms, intoxilyzer investigative action Counterfeiting/For slips,field sobriety tests forms, is on or before gery, runaway forms, release of custody December 31, 2013 Destruction/Damag forms (juveniles), criminal e/Vandalism of background information Property, (ILETS/Triple III,Ada LE Lookup, Drug/Narcotic ISTARS, JDOC), documents Offenses, provided by citizens and victims, Embezzlement, 621Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Espionage, citations,property invoices, release of Extortion/Blackmai property forms,Leads Online 1,Fraud Offenses, printouts, shoplifting reports from Fugitive Offenses, store security officers, etc.). May Gambling, include polygraph records (pre- Immigration examination records, questions, Violations, statements of consent, analysis Larceny/Theft reports, results charts, conclusions, Offenses, Motor interviewee statements, related Vehicle Theft, information), abandoned vehicle Pornography/Obsc reports,found property records, ene Material, traffic collision reports,property and Prostitution evidence control and disposition Offenses, Robbery, records (e.g., evidence photographs, Stolen Property receipt forms, evidence logs,property Offenses, Treason, reports, destruction lists,property and Weapon Law consignment sheets, seized firearm Violations) logs, homicide evidence inventories, etc.), and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants' activities and related records). Crime reports Reports documenting a criminal Semipermanent Destroy records (DRs) for Group A offense and actions taken, including IC related to prosecuted Misdemeanor charges or arrests. Record typically SO- cases where final Offenses and includes location of occurrence, date 907(2)(g) disposition is dated Group B Offenses and time, handling officer, involved on or before parties (suspects, victims,witnesses, December 31, 2018 (Including Bad reporting parties, etc.) and their Checks, Bond personal information, summary of Destroy records Default, events and supportive documents (e.g., related to non- Curfew/Loitering/V probable cause statements, witness prosecuted cases agrancy Violations, statements, tow slips, administrative where last Disorderly license suspension forms, intoxilyzer investigative action Conduct, Driving slips,field sobriety tests forms, is on or before Under the runaway forms, release of custody December 31, 2018 Influence, forms (juveniles), criminal Drunkenness, background information Family Offenses (ILETS/Triple III,Ada LE Lookup, Nonviolent, Federal ISTARS, JDOC), documents Resource Violation, provided by citizens and victims, Liquor Law citations,property invoices, release of Violations, Peeping property forms,Leads Online Tom, Perjury, printouts, shoplifting reports from Trespass of Real store security officers, etc.). May 631Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Property,All Other include polygraph records (pre- Offenses) examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis Code enforcement reports, results charts, conclusions, offences (eg. UDC, interviewee statements, related nuisance, parking, information), abandoned vehicle vehicle impound) reports,found property records, traffic collision reports,property and evidence control and disposition records (e.g., evidence photographs, receipt forms, evidence logs,property reports, destruction lists,property consignment sheets, seized firearm logs, homicide evidence inventories, etc.), and/or informant case files (reports, correspondence, payment records, fingerprint cards, signature cards, letters of understanding on informants' activities and related records). Citations Police department copy of citations Temporary Destroy records (Misdemeanor and issued for traffic violations not dated on or before Infraction) for associated with a crime report. Record IC§50- December 31, 2021 Other Crimes typically includes date and time, 907(3)(d) location of offense, vehicle license plate information, code violation number, and issuing officer. Digital media— Digital media attached to a crime Semipermanent Destroy records Type 1 (Associated report for a major crime. Includes IC§50- related to prosecuted with Major Crimes video, audio, or other digital content 907(2)(g) cases where final Reports, created by a law enforcement officer disposition is dated Unattended Deaths, in the course of an investigation or on or before and Suicides) response and attached to a crime December 31, 1923 report for Major crimes including Homicide Offenses, Human Destroy records Trafficking, Kidnapping/Abduction, related to non- Sex Offenses, and Terrorism prosecuted cases where last investigative action is on or before December 31, 1923 Digital media— Digital media attached to a crime Semipermanent Group A Cases: Type 2 (Associated report other than a major crime. IC§50- with Group A and Includes video, audio, or other digital 907(2)(g) Destroy records B Reports) content created by a law enforcement related to prosecuted cases where final 641Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD officer in the course of an disposition is dated investigation or response and attached on or before to a crime report for a crime other than December 31, 2013 a major crime. Destroy records related to non- prosecuted cases where last investigative action is on or before December 31, 2013 Group B Cases: Destroy records related to prosecuted cases where final disposition is dated on or before December 31, 2018 Destroy records related to non- prosecuted cases where last investigative action is on or before December 31, 2018 Digital media— Digital media related to an officer Temporary Destroy records Type 5* complaint. Includes video, audio, or IC§50- dated on or before other digital content created by a law 907(3)(d) December 31, 2021 enforcement officer in the course of an investigation or response relevant to a complaint about such response or officer. *Where record is embedded with a crime report(DR), it shall be retained according to the retention period established for the crime report. Field interview An informational document written by Semipermanent Destroy records reports (FI cards) police officers relating to individuals, IC§50- dated on or before events, or vehicles for which the 907(2)(g) December 31, 2018 officer does not have probable cause for enforcement. Typically includes name and current address of person contacted, physical description of person or vehicle, officer's name, 651Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD location of contact, date and time, reason for contact, etc. Grant records Applications and required reporting Semipermanent Destroy records of documents for grants to support law Idaho Code § grants closed out on enforcement initiatives and 50-907(2)(g) or before December programming (e.g., crime prevention, 31, 2013 substance abuse programs, criminal justice, SWAT). Health & Welfare Referrals of suspected child abuse, Semipermanent Destroy records Referrals adult abuse and daycare complaints. IC§50- related to cases APS & Daycare 907(2)(g closed or referred on complaints or before December 31, 2018 Internal affairs files Records documenting department's Semipermanent Destroy records investigation of an officer's role in an IC§§50- related to employees incident for the purpose of evaluating 907(2)(g) and who have separated compliance with department policy 45-610; 29 CFR and completed any and professional standards. Records 1627.3; 29 CFR related litigation on typically include investigative 1602.31 or before December materials (video and audio recordings, 31, 1948 written statements, narratives, analysis),polygraph records (pre- examination records, questions, statements of consent, analysis reports, results charts, conclusions, interviewee statements, related information), and recommended disciplinary actions, if any. Intoxilyzer 5000en, Factory and State of Idaho certificates Temporary Destroy records Draeger 9510 and for instrument; log of each person that IC§50- related to machines LifeLoc instrument takes the breathalyzer test and 907(3)(d) and with certificates records verification testing. May include IDAPA issued on or before suspect name, date, time, results, 11.03.01.013.06 December 31, 2020 operator name, calibration check results, simulated temperature in range, comments, etc. Master name index Information on individuals who are Semipermanent Destroy records records field interviewed, individuals who are IC§50- dated on or before arrested, suspects or accomplices in 907(2)(g) December 31, 1923 crimes, victims, complainants, and witnesses to incidents. Information typically includes name, address, date of birth, race, sex, date and time of incident or contact, case number (DR#), citation numbers and other identifying data. 66 1 Page RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD Public records Written public records requests, Semipermanent See destruction requests of records responses, records provided, and IC§50- order for the associated to a original (unredacted)records 907(2)(g) original crime DR Major Crime DR pertaining to a crime DR that falls under the Category of Crime reports (DRs) for Suicides, Unattended Deaths, and Major Crimes (murder, involuntary manslaughter, rape, sexual abuse of a child, terrorism). Radar equipment, Records documenting the calibration Temporary Destroy records certifications, and and maintenance of radar equipment IC§50- dated on or before maintenance that may be useful in documenting the 907(3)(d) December 31, 2020 records accuracy of the readings. Often after equipment includes original factory certification retirement of calibration. Information relating to maintenance and repair may include a description of the work completed, parts used, date of service, equipment number, make, model, etc. Training materials Records related to training programs Semipermanent Destroy records provided to MPD personnel by IC§50- related to a presenters including City employees, 907(2)(g) presentation or last contractors, or other presenters. May use of records dated include course descriptions, instructor on or before certifications, instructional materials, December 31, 2018 course outlines and handouts, and attendance records. Victim Witness Notations and documents Semipermanent Destroy records System documenting contact with victims and IC§50- related to cases in witnesses. 907(2)(g) which investigation was closed or case was disposed before December 31, 2003 Written warnings Written notice provided by MPD Semipermanent Destroy records officer to member of the public to IC§50- dated on or before bring attention to a potential or actual 907(2)(g) December 31, 2018 violation. * Note: Where record is used for legal,training, or purposes other than those enumerated in retention period, that record shall be retained according to the retention period established for other records similarly used. ** Note:Where record is embedded with a crime report (DR), it shall be retained 671Page PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD All Department Records Accessibility Contractor logs, key list, and any Transitory Until administrative need Records, City- other records documenting access to ends or record is Owned Facilities City-owned buildings by authorized superseded persons. Activity Reports Daily, weekly, monthly or other Transitory Until administrative need reports documenting the activities of ends or record is Public Works Department superseded employees, including: type of activity, employees involved, time spent on activity, work completed, equipment and fuel used, reports, logs, log sheets, and related records. Administrative Clothing order spreadsheets, copies o£ Transitory Until administrative need Records Accounts Payable invoices,expense ends or record is reports, leave request logs,MIP superseded Accounts Payable invoices,professional membership documents, evacuation checklists and on call yearly roster logs. Alarm Monitoring/ Reports of monitoring fire alarms, Semipermanent 5 years or until Test Results security alarms and sprinkler tests administrative need ends Reports for all relevant City-owned facilities including annual fire alarm testing, annual backflow testing, quarterly sprinkler testing in Sapphire suppression system, monthly fire pump runs, and monthly check on fire extinguishers and Sapphire. Budget Preparation Work documents utilized to build Semipermanent 20 years Records base budgets and establish yearly budgets, including vehicle replacement worksheets, enhancements, amendments and carry forward support. Confined Space A written authorization prepared Semipermanent 5 years from date issued Entry Permit prior to employee entry into a Permit Required Confined Space. The Department's permit contains specific entry space, purpose and time conditions under which the entrance will operate. Correspondence, Correspondence created or received Semipermanent 5 years Administrative in the course of administering City policies,procedures, or programs. 68 1 Page Correspondence, Day-to-day office and housekeeping Transitory Until administrative need Transitory correspondence that does not contain ends unique information about City functions or programs. Customer Complaint letters, notes on phone Transitory Until administrative need Complaints calls and in person complaints from ends customers/citizens. Databases Database records created and Transitory Until administrative need maintained for the purposes of ends or record is generating reports, data files, and a superseded variety of different outputs. Department Policies Documents the formulation, Transitory Until administrative need adoption, and implementation of ends or record is internal actions/decisions. Includes: superseded Computer, Geographic Information System(GIS) Policy, Dress Code, Purchasing department policies. Departmental Department reports, performance Semipermanent 10 years Reports management presentations. Educational Records including but not limited to Transitory Until administrative need Outreach Materials educational brochures,bookmarks, ends or record is factsheets, and posters which are superseded displayed in the division and distributed at public education outreach events. Engineering Capital Engineering Capital &Enhancement Semipermanent 10 years and Enhancement Plan(ECEP)—5-year Capital Plan (ECEP) Improvement Plan Reports. Reports Engineering Project Records including but not limited to Permanent In perpetuity File attendance for public meetings, construction drawings, meeting minutes, AVO's (Avoid Verbal Orders—Written Instructions), change orders, construction checklists, consultant reports, consultants/contractors contracts, contract addendums, council memos, daily reports, design checklists, door knockers/hangers, engineering estimates, field orders, final acceptance letters, inspection reports,Notices of Intent(NOI), Notices of Termination (NOT), Notices to Proceed (NTP),pay applications,preconstruction agendas,preconstruction notices, preconstruction recordings, progress 69 Page reports, construction punch lists, project correspondence (letters, purchase order requisitions (PO), project-related POs, QLPE (Qualified Licensed Professional Engineer) letters, record drawings (filed separately),project-related requests for information, resubmittals, submittal responses, submittals, substantial completion letters, work change directives and license agreements. Equipment Records of repair and maintenance Transitory Until administrative need Maintenance and of equipment assigned to Public ends or record is Repair Records Work, including but not limited to: superseded. generators, sewage lift pumps, water pumps, streetlights, office equipment, and furniture. Records may include summaries, reports, and similar records usually compiled from daily work records on a monthly or quarterly basis. Facility Records regarding maintenance and Transitory Until administrative need Assessments, repairs of buildings and grounds ends or record is Maintenance, and owned or leased by the City superseded Repair Records including assessments of the condition of City-owned buildings, summaries, logs, reports, and similar records usually compiled from daily work records. Forms Forms created for use by Public Transitory Until administrative need Works personnel to facilitate their ends or record is work including but not limited to superseded performance review forms,project forms, staff forms, communication forms, and record retention labels. Geographic Aerial photographs of properties Permanent In perpetuity Information within the City. Systems,Digital Orthophotography Images Geographic Points, lines, attributes, and Transitory Until superseded Information polygons relating to infrastructure Systems, GIS Data that the City owns or maintains. Geographic A visual representation of data Transitory Until administrative need Information within a particular geographical ends Systems,Maps area. Also includes maps and data provided by outside agencies 701Page including edge of pavement,parcels, roads, and others. Health and Safety Documents related to the Public Transitory Until administrative need Manual Works Department Health and ends or record is Safety Manual. superseded HR Documents Departmental employee personnel Transitory Until employment is records should be kept in the terminated; then forward to appropriate Division's file until HR employment has been terminated (involuntary or voluntary) and then the file should be sent to HR for retention. Master Plan Records that document the present Permanent In perpetuity Records and projected needs of the City for water, sewer, storm drainage, streets, bike paths, and other utility related systems. Includes an implementation schedule for construction, plans, reports, evaluations, cost analyses, drawings, and related documents containing rates, inventory evaluations, system rehabilitation or replacement, distribution of services, etc. Meeting Minutes Internal meeting agendas, minutes, Semipermanent 5 years sign-in sheets Photos,Building Photos relating to repair and Transitory Until administrative need Maintenance replacement of City-owned ends equipment, material, and facilities. Photos, Photos relating to Public Works Transitory Until administrative need Development construction activities, ends Construction infrastructure, inspection photos, etc. for Development projects Photos, General Photos related to Public Works Transitory Until administrative need Department activities and other ends general use pictures. Potential Exposure Report created when personnel is Transitory See Human Resources Records exposed or potentially exposed to a Employee Medical Records chemical, including SDS sheet of the chemical involved. Record is forwarded to Human Resources. Presentations Departmental presentations. Semipermanent 10 years Preventative Preventative maintenance schedules, Transitory Until administrative need Maintenance Work work orders. ends or record is Plans superseded. Process Documents Standard Operating Procedures, Transitory Until administrative need Instructions, Process Flowcharts, ends Workflows, Responsible 711 Page Accountable Consulted Informed (RACI) Charts and Process Performance Measures. Quotes Quotes from contractors and other Transitory Until administrative need service providers. Preliminary and ends final quotes for goods and services used to conduct building repairs, maintenance, or modifications. Record Drawings - The electronic files for the revised Permanent In perpetuity Electronic Records set of drawings submitted by contractor upon completion of land development phase of a commercial, governmental, or residential project or components thereof. This includes the PDF and autocad files for the stamped record drawings, as- builts, and wiring diagrams including but not limited to water and sewer infrastructure as installed in Meridian. Record Drawings - The revised set of drawings Transitory Until administrative need Paper Records submitted by contractor upon ends completion of land development phase of a commercial, governmental, or residential project or components thereof. This includes the stamped record drawings, as-builts, including but not limited to water and sewer infrastructure as installed in Meridian. Resource Notebooks, Meeting Notes, To Do Transitory Until administrative need Documents/Notes Lists, employee-compiled notes or ends or record is references to assist in work superseded including non-city lawsuits. Also includes documents and reports from outside agencies related to project development, bidding, and progress as well as streetlight inspections. Safety Audits Health and Safety audits. Temporary 3 years after most recent audit Safety Data Sheets Safety Data Sheets (SDS). Also see Transitory Until chemical is removed (SDS) Potential Exposure Records above. or record is superseded Safety/Health and Safety and health documents Semipermanent 75 years Testing including but not limited to training, auditory testing records, respirator fit test information. 721Page Safety Meeting Topics covered and sign-up sheet for Semipermanent 5 years Agenda/Signup employees who attended the Sheets meetings. Special Projects Documents related to special or one- Semipermanent 10 years after completion time projects to include,but not limited to: Strategic Plans, Inventory Management, Project Information, Rail with Trail, Subdivisions, and Accreditation. Studies Studies related to Public Works as Transitory Until administrative need provided by consultants. ends Supervisory Reports printed from Supervisory Transitory Until administrative need Control and Data Control and Data Acquisition ends or record is Acquisition Reports (SCADA) system. superseded (SCADA) Surveys Public Works initiated internal and Semipermanent 10 years external surveys and survey results. Technical Manuals, Owner's manuals and warranties for Transitory Until administrative need Specifications, and City-owned vehicles and equipment. ends or record is Warranties Includes specifications, operating superseded instructions, safety information, and terms of coverage of repair or replacement of equipment. Training and Travel Records documenting attendance Semipermanent 5 years and presentation by City employees at conventions, conferences, seminars, workshops, and similar training events. Includes training requests, travel requests, training and Continuing Education Unit (CEU)tracking reports, and related correspondence. Vehicle Inspection, Maintenance records, inspection Transitory Until administrative need Maintenance, work orders for vehicles, vehicle ends or record is Repair Work mileage reports, repair records. superseded Orders, and Reports Water Rights Records related to City of Meridian Permanent In perpetuity Water Rights including, but not limited to, correspondence, agency filings, legal opinions, references. Website Public Works Department Website. Transitory Until administrative need ends or record is superseded Administration Area of Impact Records related to analysis of Semipermanent 75 years Records expansion of Public Works services 731Page into the Area of Impact such as those for Kuna, Kuna Treatment Plant, Meridian Heights Water and Sewer District, South Meridian Planning. Committee Records Agendas and meeting minutes for Semipermanent 5 years special groups convened by Public Works such as City Services Focus Group, Construction Best Management Practices Sub- Committee, Energy. Emergency Master Emergency plan records for City Semipermanent 10 years Plans Hall, Emergency Management, and Continuity of Operations. Events, Public Records related to planning Public Semipermanent 10 years Works Works internal and external events. Newsletters Annual newsletter prepared by the Permanent In perpetuity Public Works Department. Newsletters Monthly staff newsletter. Transitory Until administrative need (Internal) ends. Organization Organization charts. Transitory Until administrative need Charts ends or record is superseded Rate/Fee Records Records related to establishing Semipermanent 20 years utility rates and fees, including calculations, research and recommendations. 741Page Capital Projects and Facilities Capital Records including but not limited to Transitory Records are kept until Improvement attendance for public meetings, project completion and then Projects for Other AVO's (Avoid Verbal Orders— turned over to appropriate Departments Written Instructions), change orders, department construction checklists, consultant reports, consultants/contractor's contracts, contract addendums, council memos, daily reports, design checklists, door knockers/hangers engineering estimates, field orders, final acceptance letters, inspection reports,Notices of Intent(NOI), Notices of Termination (NOT), Notices to Proceed, pay applications, preconstruction agendas, preconstruction notices, preconstruction recordings,progress reports, construction punchlists, project correspondence (letters, responses),project info memos, project schedules,project-related purchase order(PO)requisitions, project-related POs, QLPE (Qualified Licensed Professional Engineer) letters, record drawings (filed separately),project-related requests for information, resubmittals, submittal responses, submittals, substantial completion letters, work change directives, license agreements. Engineering Fire Flow Requests Requests from customers for fire Semipermanent 75 years flow and responses from Engineering staff based on computer modeling. Mailing Lists Project mailing lists. Transitory Until project completed Reference Preliminary engineering reports, Permanent In perpetuity Documents facility plans, other studies. Sewer Modeling Requests from customers to run Semipermanent 75 years Requests sewer model for capacity and sizing and response from Engineering staff based on computer modeling. Specifications Specifications such as, but not Transitory Until administrative need limited to the City's Supplemental ends or record is Specs, Idaho Standards for Public superseded 751Page Works Construction(ISPWC), and American Water Works Association (AWWA). Variance Documents, including, but not Permanent In perpetuity limited to application, associated checklist items, staff reports, Findings, and streetlight or utility variance requests. Environmental Environmental Awards presented to citizens and Semipermanent 10 years Awards Records businesses in recognition of environmental contributions to the community. This includes but is not limited to award nominations, certificates, photographs, and lists of recipients. Floodplain Records of floodplain development Permanent In Perpetuity Administration including floodplain permits and floodplain certificates. Pretreatment Industrial Records related to the identification, Semipermanent Keep all records five years, Pretreatment inspections sampling,permitting, until the end of the IMES formalized agreements and/or permit cycle, or as contracts between the City and requested by state or individual facilities within the federal agencies, whichever business and industrial sectors that is longer must comply with the federal requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 403, General Pretreatment regulations. These records and supporting documentation typically include: Industrial waste questionnaires, permit applications,permits and fact sheets, inspection reports, Industrial user reports, monitoring data (including laboratory reports), required plans (e.g., slug control, sludge management, pollution prevention), enforcement activities, and correspondence to and from the Industrial User. Permitted Facilities Records related to permitted Semipermanent 10 years facilities, including zero discharge permits 76 Page Photos,Industrial Photos related to the identification, Semipermanent Keep all records five years, Pretreatment inspections sampling,permitting, until the end of the IPDES formalized agreements and/or permit cycle, or as contracts between the City and requested by state or individual facilities within the federal agencies, whichever business and industrial sectors that is longer must comply with the federal requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 403, General Pretreatment regulations. Pretreatment Awards presented to businesses in Semipermanent 5 years Awards Records recognition of Best Management Practices (BMP) contributions to the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility. This includes but is not limited to award nominations, certificates, photographs, and lists of recipients. Streetli hts/Trans ortation & Utility Coordination Activation Letters Requests to Idaho Power for the Permanent In Perpetuity purpose of activating streetlights and creating a transfer of ownership. Agreements & Includes, but not limited to, Permanent In Perpetuity Contracts Maintenance agreements, Conduit Share agreements, Streetlight Electrical Service agreements, and all related documents and reports. Includes, but not limited to, Permanent In Perpetuity Maintenance agreements, Conduit Share agreements, Streetlight Electrical Service agreements, and all related documents and reports. Includes, but not limited to, Semipermanent 10 years after expiration Interagency agreements (IAAs), ACHD Cooperative agreements and all related documents and reports. Includes, but not limited to, MOUs, Semipermanent Until administrative need Co-location agreements, Future ends Installation agreements, Reimbursement agreements, Shields agreements Surety agreements and all related documents and reports. Moratorium Cut Requests to ACHD to do a utility Semipermanent 10 years after expiration Requests repair in an area with a 5-year no cut moratorium 771Page Wastewater Air Permit All documents and reports related to Semipermanent 5 years from the date of the the Air Permit. Can include reports, monitoring sample, manuals, data, and calibration measurement, report or information. application; or from end of permit Biosolids All documents and reports related to Semipermanent 5 years,until end of the biosolids production and disposal. IPDES permit cycle, or Can include Sewer Sludge longer as requested by state Application Site Logs and Sewage or federal agencies; Sludge Management Plans. Discharge monitoring reports kept 20 years after permit expiration Discharge Records documenting effluent Semipermanent Keep discharge monitoring Monitoring Records quality discharged from the City reports 20 years after wastewater treatment facility. permit expiration. Keep all Includes permit required supporting other records 5 years,until documentation. the end of the IPDES permit cycle, or as requested by state or federal agencies, whichever is longer Equipment Records documenting the Semipermanent Keep 5 years after Maintenance & maintenance and calibration of equipment removed from Calibration Records equipment and instruments used to service, until the end of the undertake and monitor wastewater IPDES permit cycle, or as treatment operations. Useful to requested by state or verify equipment reliability and for federal agencies, or the life reference by regulatory agencies. of City Database, Information includes: date, type of whichever is longer. equipment maintained or calibrated, tests performed, repairs needed, comments, and related information. Idaho Pollutant Records documenting the Semipermanent Keep all records 5 years, Discharge application for and issuance of a 40 CFR 122.41 until the end of the IPDES Elimination System permit to the City under the Idaho permit cycle, or as (IPDES) Records Pollutant Discharge Elimination requested by state or System(IPDES)program which federal agencies, whichever allows discharge of specific is longer. pollutants under controlled conditions. Records typically include: applications, permits, addenda, modifications, and related supporting documentation. Information includes: influent and effluent limits, chemical analysis records, water flow, test and recording requirements, definitions 78 Page and acronyms, compliance schedules, and related data. Reclaimed Water Includes all records related to the Semipermanent Keep for two years beyond Records (REUSE) reclaimed water permit. Can include the period of the permit, or permits, permit applications, as requested by state or manuals,plans, agreements, data federal agencies, whichever and reports. is longer. Sewer Maintenance Records documenting the Semipermanent Keep records requiring and Repair Records maintenance and repair of City engineering stamps two sewers. May include summaries, years after life of structure. reports, and similar records usually Keep other records five compiled from daily work records years or until asset is on a monthly or quarterly basis. removed from service or the administrative need ends. Sewer Smoke Test Records documenting smoke tests Semipermanent 10 years Records undertaken to verify hookup to main sewer lines, check condition of pipes, or determine effectiveness of backflow prevention devices. Information typically includes: maps or diagrams of lines tested, location of leaks detected, inspector's name, pipe size, and related information. Sewer Television/ Records from contractors Semipermanent 5 years Videoscan documenting television inspections Inspection Records used to locate problems and defects (External) in sewer lines. Often consists of, inspections of newly constructed lines. Sewer Television/ Records documenting television Transitory Until administrative need Videoscan inspections used to locate problems ends or record is Inspection Records and defects in sewer lines. Often superseded. (Internal) consists of periodic inspections of existing lines, final inspections of newly constructed lines, and inspections at the end of warranty periods. Valve Maintenance Records documenting the location, Semipermanent Keep records requiring Records specifications, maintenance, and engineering stamps two repair of valves in the City sewer years after life of structure. system. Includes lists, charts, Keep other records five drawings, reports, logs, and related years or until asset is records, valve location, removed from service or identification number, run of pipe, the administrative need size, make, year installed, depth, ends. turns to open and normal position, narratives of valve maintenance and 791Page repair, test run,personnel completing work, dates, and related information. Wastewater Complaint letters, notes, or phone Semipermanent Keep all records five years, Customer calls and in-person complaints from until the end of the IPDES Complaint Records customers or citizens permit cycle, or as requested by state or federal agencies, whichever is longer. Wastewater Preventative maintenance schedules, Semipermanent Keep records five years or Preventative work orders until the asset is removed Maintenance Work from service or until the Plan Records period of reclaimed water permit plus two years,until the end of the IPDES Permit cycle, or as requested by state or federal agencies, or the life of City Database, whichever is longer. Water Backflow Dual A list of customers who have two Transitory Until administrative need Connection List water connection sources for ends outdoor use Backflow Surveys A survey of properties noting the Transitory Until administrative need location and type of hazard and type ends or record is of assembly superseded Backflow Tester Tester information including a copy Transitory Until administrative need Information of their license,proof of insurance, ends or record is and tester kit calibration superseded Backflow Tester A list of backflow testers with their Transitory Until administrative need List pricing ends or record is superseded Backflow Tests Backflow assemblies test report Temporary 3 years Chlorine Residuals/ A report showing sample dates and Permanent In perpetuity Compliance locations of free chlorine remaining in the City waters stem Construction Bacteria sample results taken for Semipermanent 5 years or until Samples water line/well construction administrative need ends Consumer Report mandated by EPA delivered Transitory Until administrative need Confidence Reports to Meridian citizens that are ends CCR's connected to City water Critical Water Records that identify critical water Transitory Until administrative need Users users within the City of Meridian, ends or record is such as hospitals, medical facilities, superseded schools, large corporate facilities, hotels, motels, restaurants, and the water park. This record evolves as 801Page new businesses move into Meridian and critical water users leave Meridian. Daily Chlorine Field notes from Chlorine residuals Temporary 3 years Residuals taken from various sample ports in the City waters stem Digline Marking Agreements between City and Semipermanent 5 years Agreement Excavators for marking facility Fire Flow Reports Actual fire flow data taken from a Semipermanent 75 years articular fire hydrant Hydrant Meter Billing documents from fire hydrant Transitory Until administrative needs Reads Spreadsheet meter readings based on water used ends for construction ISO Fire Hydrant Updates to our Insurance Evaluator Semipermanent 5 years Reports notifying them of new hydrants to Water System Leak Letters Letters that are mailed to customer Semipermanent 5 years informing customer of a possible leak are attached to the service order for leak check License Agreements Agreement between water purveyors Permanent In perpetuity (City of Meridian) and the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(IDEA) for discharge of domestic water into U.S waterways Maximum Maximum Contaminant Level Permanent In perpetuity Contaminant Level (MCL)Violation notices. Required (MCL) Public by Department of Environmental Notification (DEQ) Quality(DEQ)to notify the public. Meter Warranty A report on meter warranty Semipermanent 25 years Report Monitoring Waivers Sampling waivers to reduce the Permanent In perpetuity frequency of sampling Production & Repair/Maintenance history on Transitory Until superseded or Maintenance distribution&Production system administrative need ends Distribution System and all related equipment History PRV/Wells Reads Asset Management software reports Permanent In perpetuity on Pressure Reducing Valves (PRV) and Well reads Radio Licensing Licensing spreadsheets for SCADA Transitory Until administrative need radios, base station and vehicle ends or record is two/way radios, meter reading superseded infrastructure Reclaimed Water Reads from reclaimed meters based Transitory Until administrative need Read Spreadsheet on water used ends 811 Page Reclaimed Water Survey reports to monitor Transitory Until administrative need Surveys compliance ends or record is superseded Safety Inspections Inspections/Reports for Gas Semipermanent 30 years Monitors, Crane, Fall Protection, and Fire Inspection Sampling Chain of Sample report form for sampling Permanent In perpetuity Custody City water for bacteria to satisfy compliance monitoring. Results are reported on separate form unless sampling is done for Bac-T. Sampling Forms for calibration and Permanent In perpetuity Equipment certification or repair of sampling Calibration/Repair equipment Sampling Sample report form for sampling the Permanent In perpetuity Results/Special/ water for compliance and Compliance noncompliance monitoring Service Orders Records including requests from Transitory Until administrative need customer,Utility Billing, or Water ends or record is Division to perform work or get a superseded read at an address as well as historical logs showing service order number Spring flush notices Flush notices mailed to customers Semipermanent 5 years (Mailers) for spring flush of water system/ Maps Subdivision Map Spreadsheet with subdivision Transitory Until administrative need Section reports number ends or record is superseded System Location Maps, Photos, hand drawings of Transitory Until administrative needs Documents Water System Components ends or record is superseded Turbidity Reports Logs used for entering wasted water Semipermanent 25 years flushed from the water system and not sold. Flush locations are listed. Water Quality information, including Nephelometer Turbidity (NTU)readings, are documented. Water Asset Records that identify asset location Transitory Until administrative need Information and manufacturer maintenance ends or record is information superseded Water Meter Water meter reports including NC Semipermanent 5 years Reports list,billing status report, autoread master route report, billing pre-scan report, re-reads, and water meter testing results, Sensus analytics, RNI Reports 821Page Water Quality Any mailed correspondence with Semipermanent 15 years Correspondence labs, customers, regulators concerning sampling Water Quality Records documenting water quality Semipermanent 25 years Master Log calls from customers Well Disconnects Documents on private well Permanent In perpetuity disconnects 831Page w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2559: A Resolution Amending the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan to Adopt by Reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024); Adopt by Reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as Incorporated Therein; Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference," Including Minor Cleanup and Ensure the Most Current Adopted Plans and Studies are Referenced; Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to Add/Modify Language; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2559 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF MERIDIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY (MAY 24, 2024) AND ADA COUNTY JAIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY(MAY 24,2024);ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE CITY OF MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES STUDY(SEPTEMBER 16,2022) AND AMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AS INCORPORATED THEREIN; AMEND THE "LIST OF ADOPTED PLANS AND STUDIES BY REFERENCE," INCLUDING MINOR CLEANUP AND ENSURE THE MOST CURRENT ADOPTED PLANS AND STUDIES ARE REFERENCED; AMEND "APPENDIX A. GLOSSARY OF TERMS" TO ADD/MODIFY LANGUAGE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019, the 2019 City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan") was adopted by Meridian City Council Resolution No. 19-2179; and, WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary to amend the Meridian Comprehensive Plan from time to time; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department further recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan to adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study(May 24,2024); adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study(September 16,2022)and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein; amend the "List Of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference," including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced; amend"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"to add/modify language; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 18, 2025 regarding the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council have deemed it appropriate to amend the Comprehensive Plan, as set forth in the staff report for Case No. H-2025-0045 ("Staff Report"), which is fully incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS,the City has complied in all respects with the requirements of the Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act; RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN—H-2025-0045—Page 1 of 2 NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as set forth in the Staff Report to adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024); adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein; amend the "List Of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference," including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced; and amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to add/modify language. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6509(3), a copy of the amended Comprehensive Plan,along with this Resolution, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian,Idaho,this 16th day of December, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 16th day of December, 2025. APPROVED: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN—H-2025-0045—Page 2 of 2 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2558: A Resolution Establishing the Appointment of William (Bill) Baber to Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2558 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR, WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE APPOINTMENT OF WILLIAM (BILL) BABER TO SEAT 3 OF THE MERIDIAN SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMISSION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,Meridian City Code §2-1-1(D)sets forth Advisory Commissions'membership qualifications and terms of service; and WHEREAS, Meridian City Code § 2-1-4 establishes the Solid Waste Advisory Commission, its duties and powers; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems it to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Meridian to approve the appointment of William(Bill) Baber to Seat 3 of the Solid Waste Advisory Commission as recommended by Mayor Simison; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO: Section 1. That, effectively immediately, William (Bill) Baber is hereby appointed to Seat 3 of the Meridian Solid Waste Advisory Commission,which term shall expire September 30, 2028; Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 161h day of December, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho,this 16th day of December, 2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF WILLIAM BILL)SABER TO SEAT 3 OF THE SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMISSION-Page I E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. i CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: December 16, 2025 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Addendum to State & Local Agreement Between City of Meridian and the Idaho Transportation Board by and through the Idaho Transportation Department for the Rail with Trail Pathway E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Amendment in the Amount of$183,955.00 for Rail with Trail Pathway Construction E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement Between Owner and Contractor for Construction Contract (Stipulated Price) Between City of Meridian and Mountain Companies, LLC for the Rail with Trail Pathway E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Employee Health Benefits Trust Quarterly Update E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Amendment in the amount of$781,110.00 for Employee Benefits Trust Plan E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Fiscal Year 2026 Water and Sewer Rate Increase PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: December 16, 2025 ITEM # 19 PROJECT NAME: Fiscal Year 2026 Water and Sewer Rate Increase wish to testify Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing ( fyes) (Please Print) HOA.a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 C� fIEN DL4,,A H �. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Workshop Agenda From: Laurelei McVey, Public Works Meeting Date: December 16, 2025 Presenter: Laurelei McVey, Public Works Estimated Time: 15 minutes Topic: FY26 Water and Sewer Rate Increase Public Hearing Recommended Council Action: Approval of FY26 water and sewer rate resolution. Background: The FY26 proposal includes a 2.62% combined rate increase distributed over the rate structure as noted in the following table. This increase is expected to have an impact of approximately $1.66/month for the average Meridian resident. Fee Current Fee % Increase Proposed Fee Water rate-base administrative fee $5.94 9% $6.47 Water rate-use charge (per 1,000gallons) $2.06 4% $2.14 Sewer rate-base administrative fee $9.35 3% $9.63 Sewer rate-use charge (per 1,000gallons) $5.99 1% $6.05 The increase is needed to continue to fund operational and capital construction costs as well as meeting State and Federal safe drinking water and wastewater requirements. The following above rates would become effective Jan 1St, 2026. The proposed rate increase was discussed in the November 12th City Council meeting, published in the Nov 20th and December Sth utility bills, published in the December 2nd and December 9th newspapers, and is scheduled for a Public Hearing on December 16th, 2025. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2551: A Resolution Adopting FY2026 Public Works Water and Sewer Rates and Fees CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2551 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION ADOPTING INCREASING FEES OF THE MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT; ORDERING THAT SUCH FEES SHALL SUPERSEDE FEES PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED; AND AUTHORIZING THE MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2026. WHEREAS, according to the requirements of Idaho Code section 63-1311A, following publication of notice in the Idaho Press on December 2, 2025 and December 9, 2025, on December 16, 2025 the City Council of the City of Meridian held a public hearing on the adoption of proposed increases to fees of the Meridian Public Works Department, as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, following such hearing, the City Council,by formal motion, did approve said proposed increasing fees of the Meridian Public Works Department; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the following fees shall be adopted as of January 1, 2026: Fee description Fee amount Water rate—base (administrative fee) $6.47 Water rate—use charge (per 1,000 gallons) $2.14 Sewer rate—base (administrative fee) $9.63 Sewer rate—use charge (per 1,000gallons) $6.05 Section 2. That, as of January 1, 2026, the fees set forth herein will supersede all fees previously adopted for such services. Section 3. That, as of January 1, 2026, the Meridian Public Works Department shall be authorized to implement and carry out the collection of said fees. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 16th day of December 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 16th day of December 2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING PUBLIC WORKS FEES PAGE 1 C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline Changes to Agenda: None Item #21: Borough Village (H-2025-0037) Application(s):  Development Agreement Modification  Planned Unit Development Modification  Rezone  Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of approximately 3 acres of land, zoned L-O, located at 1250 E. Everest St. History: In 2015, applications were submitted for a rezone to R-15 & a modification to the PUD to change the use and site layout from office to MFR for the development of 34 townhome style units at a gross density of 12.55 units/acre, which were denied by Council due to their opinion the R-15 zone was not in the best interest of the City at that time. Reasons cited were that the density of the development proposed with the PD was too high and the entitled office uses would off-set the MFR use approved in Phase 1. Other relevant testimony included preference for uses allowed in the L-O district such as professional office uses, a daycare facility and/or fitness facility, rather than more MFR units in this area. In 2016, a short plat application was submitted & approved for the subject property and adjacent property to the east, which included the eastern portion of the vacated ROW from Jericho Rd., which was vacated by ACHD after ITD decided to eliminate the collector street connection to Chinden Blvd. A 35’ wide landscaped street buffer with irrigation, a 10’ wide multi-use pathway and 10’ tall berm and wall was constructed along Chinden Blvd/SH-20/26 with the subdivision improvements as required by the DA but was later removed by ITD with the road widening project. ITD acquired an additional 10 feet of right-of-way from the subject property and installed a 10-foot-tall concrete wall for buffering along with decorative rock on the south side of Chinden Blvd. in this area. Utilities were installed, which included a large transformer, underground power and a natural gas line between the back of sidewalk and the wall. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MU-C (Mixed Use – Community) – Integrated community-serving, employment & residential uses are desired in this designation. Residential uses are expected to comprise between 20% and 50% of the overall MU-C development area with gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre of the residential area. Summary of Request: The Applicant proposes a modification to the existing DA & PUD for Westborough Square to update the use (from office to residential) & concept development plan \[from 6 office buildings to (18) MFR units in SFR attached-style structures and (2) SFR dwelling units\] for the site and a new DA for the subject property. A variety of community-serving uses exist in the overall MU-C designated area & residential uses comprise less than 50% of the area. A rezone of 3.04 acres of land is proposed from the L-O to the R-15 zoning district. Reasons cited in the Applicant’s narrative supporting the proposed rezone and change of use include the lack of collector street (Jericho Rd.) access to Chinden Blvd/SH-20/26 (the nearest access is circuitous via N. Saguaro Hills Ave. to Everest St., over 1,000+’ to the west and north) and lack of visibility from the highway with ITD’s construction of a 10’ tall wall between the property and the highway, which created an isolated office zoned parcel without potential for development. The property has sat vacant and underutilized since 2008. A Preliminary Plat is proposed to develop in one phase consisting of (3) buildable lots consisting of one MFR building lot and (2) SFR building lots & (3) common/other lots consisting of an access drive, a parking lot and a common lot on 2.81 acres of land. The single- family lots range in size from 4,176 to 4,228 square feet (sq. ft.) with an average lot size of 4,202 sq. ft. The multi-family lot will contain (9) structures with 18 SFR attached style dwellings. The gross density is 6.58 dwelling units per acre is proposed consistent with the density desired in MU-C designated areas. No deviations are proposed to UDC standards with the modification to the PUD. Private usable open space consisting of patios is proposed for each unit in excess of the 80 s.f. minimum requirement. A minimum of 4,500 s.f. (or 0.10 acre) of common open space is required for the development, the Applicant is providing open space exceeding the standard by more than double the amount. A minimum of (2) amenities are required from (2) separate categories – A sports court (horseshoe pit) is proposed from the recreation category, a fenced dog park with a waste station is proposed from the Quality of Life category, and a picnic area with a shade structure is proposed from the Open Space category, exceeding UDC standards. Off-street parking is proposed in excess of the minimum standard – 51 spaces are provided over the required amount with another 16 spaces provided in an overflow parking lot along the southern boundary of the site for use by guests & residents of Borough Subdivision, the MFR development to the east, to alleviate existing parking issues in this area. A 35’ wide street buffer is required along Chinden Blvd., an entryway corridor, with noise abatement for residential uses adjoining a state highway. As previously noted, ITD removed the previously installed buffer, wall and irrigation with the road widening project and constructed a 10’ tall concrete wall at the back edge of the 10’ sidewalk along Chinden, leaving little area for a landscape buffer and no irrigation to the north side of the wall. Alternative Compliance was requested and approved by the Director to the street buffer standards in UDC 11-3B-7C.1c due to existing conflicts with utilities, which prevent installation of irrigation facilities under the footings of the wall. There is no break in the wall so maintenance of the limited area of landscaping on the north side of the wall would have to take place from Chinden which the Applicant felt would be hazardous. The subject property is also considerably lower than Chinden with a significant slope into the property from the 10’ tall wall and a 3’ tall retaining wall. As alternative compliance, the developer is required to install (9) trees north of the retaining wall with shrubs, decorative boulders and rock mulch and (4) additional trees on the south of the retaining wall, as proposed. As noted, additional common open space & amenities are provided above and beyond the minimum standards with a landscaped area behind the proposed units connecting to a pocket park area with a picnic shelter and trees as an alternative means of compliance, which provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirement. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed single-story homes as shown. Commission Recommendation: Approval at the November 20, 2025 hearing. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Becky McKay, Engineering Solutions; Jack Harriff ii. In opposition: Drew Robert and Forrest Spencer iii. Commenting: Tyler Rountree iv. Written testimony: Melissa Chandler, Melinda and Ray Akhbari, Ginne Hostvedt, and John Elliott v. Key Issue(s): Safety concerns for children & pedestrians with the increased traffic, inadequate parking, increased traffic volume on surrounding roads not designed to handle the volume, increase in noise in the quiet neighborhood, incompatibility with surrounding land uses, and strain on City services & infrastructure. Desire for a traffic signal at the Saguaro Hills & Chinden Blvd/SH 20-26 intersection. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. Installation of “No Parking” signs along the entry drive to reduce congestion. ii. In favor of the extra parking proposed with this development to alleviate existing parking issues in the area. iii. Encourage the Applicant to continue to work with the abutting Hightower HOA to improve the strip of land that is vacated ROW on their property for a larger shared common area between the two developments. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. Include a new condition requiring “No Parking” signs to be installed along the common entry driveway shared with the multi- family development to the east and for enforcement of such. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2025-0037, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 16, 2025, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2025-0037, as presented during the hearing on December 16, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2025-0037 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Item #22: Apex Cadence (H-2024-0061) Application(s):  Development Agreement Modification  Annexation  De-Annexation  Rezone  Preliminary Plat  Planned Unit Development Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 51.5 acres of land, zoned R-8, located at 6575 S. Locust Grove Rd., south of E. Lake Hazel Rd., on the west side of S. Locust Grove Rd. History: This property was originally annexed with a DA as part of the larger South Meridian annexation in 2015 & assigned a “placeholder” zoning district of R-4. The DA requires a modification to the agreement prior to development of the MU-C designated areas to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates consistency with the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments & specifically the MU-C designation. The DA was amended in 2020 & the property was rezoned to R-8 but a development plan was not submitted at that time for this portion of the property. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: MDR (40.5 acres) & MU-C (10.9 acres) Summary of Request: The Applicant requests a modification to the existing DA to include a conceptual development plan for the subject property, as required. The new DA will pertain only to the subject property and not the larger Apex development. The proposed concept plan depicts a mix of SFR detached & attached homes on the portion of the site proposed to be included in the preliminary plat; and future collector streets & FLUM designations on the property to the north that is outside the boundary of the plat. The MDR designation calls for a gross density of 3 to 8 units/acre – the proposed density is 4.1 units/acre. In the MU-C designation, residential uses are expected to comprise between 20% and 50% of the development area at gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre. Approximately 50% of the overall MU-C area is proposed to develop with residential uses at a gross density of 6 units/acre as desired. Although the residential density is consistent with that desired in the Comp Plan for the MU-C designation, the proposed development isn’t consistent with other MU-C design elements that pertain to integration of uses and vehicular interconnectivity between developments due to the orientation of the proposed development in relation to the future non-residential uses to the north and the gated development, which restricts access and hinders integration of uses as desired in mixed use designated areas. The City Council should determine if the proposed development plan should be modified to be more consistent with the general mixed use and MU-C development guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan as required by the DA. A Rezone of 56.11-acres of land from the R-8 to the R-15 zoning district is proposed for the area proposed to be platted as well as for the future development area to the north. Annexation of 0.86 of an acre of land with an R-15 zoning district for a strip of land located along the west boundary of the property adjacent to the Rawson Canal that was inadvertently left out of the original annexation boundary that is part of the subject parcel. De-annexation of a strip of land consisting of 0.52 of an acre from the City to Ada County located along the west boundary of the site on the north & south sides of Via Roberto St. is requested that was inadvertently included in the original annexation. This area was previously included in a ROS to adjust the property line between the two properties and the abutting property to the west (Bruno) but was never recorded so it’s still part of the original parcels. Before a new property boundary adjustment/ROS can be approved and recorded between the properties to rectify the issue, the property needs to be in the County. A Preliminary Plat is proposed consisting of 228 single-family residential building lots, 41 common lots and 16 other lots on 51.5-acres of land in the proposed R-15 district and is proposed to develop in 5 phases as shown. The overall gross density is 4.43 units/acre. Based on 51.5 acre of development area, a minimum of 15% (or 7.73 acres) of qualified open space is required to be provided – a total of 9.75 acres (or 19%) is proposed consisting of several open grassy areas exceeding 5,000 s.f. in area; linear open space; 50% of the street buffer along S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street; 100% of the street buffer along E. Via Roberto St., a collector street; a protective buffer dedicated for active access along the Rawson Canal; and parkways along local residential streets as shown on the open space exhibit, which exceeds UDC standards. A minimum of 10 site amenity points are required to be provided – site amenities totaling 24 points are proposed consisting of a clubhouse greater than 5,000 s.f. in size, paved sports courts, multi-use pathways and a pedestrian circulation system aligned with linear open space, which exceeds UDC standards. A PUD is proposed for a (mostly) gated residential development consisting of a mix of SFR attached & detached homes, front-loaded and alley-loaded, with a variety of lot sizes, setbacks and home designs. Except for the 16 homes at the SWC of the development, which have public street access, the other 212 homes are within a gated community accessed via private streets with alleys and common driveways off the private streets. The gated portion of the development will be restricted to residents 55 years of age and older. The average residential lot size in the gated portion of the development is 4,665 s.f.; the average residential lot size in the non- gated portion of the development is 7,233 s.f. The PUD includes requests for deviations from certain UDC standards, as follows: • The UDC (11-3F-4A.4b) restricts gated developments to no more than 100 dwelling units; a greater number of units may be approved with a PUD. A total of 212 dwelling units are proposed; and • A reduction in the (local) street setback to living area from 10-feet to 5-feet is proposed for alley-loaded (aka Carriage Lane) units. Several conceptual building elevations were submitted for single-story & 2-story detached and attached SFR homes as shown. A variety of materials are proposed including vertical and horizontal lap siding, board and batten siding, fenestration with stone/brick veneer accents in a variety of colors and design elements/features with varying roof profiles and wall modulation that demonstrate the high quality of development proposed. The Applicant is requesting the following approvals from City Council: • Approval of a private street (i.e. E. Bingley Ln.) connection to an arterial street (i.e. S. Locust Grove Rd.). UDC 11-3F-4B.2 prohibits private street connections to an arterial street, unless otherwise allowed by the decision-making body as part of a concurrent hearing level application and approved by the transportation authority. • Approval to exceed the maximum block face standard in UDC 11-6C-3F of 1,000 with a pedestrian connection for Block 1, a portion of which lies along the Rawson Canal. Commission Recommendation: Approval at the November 20, 2025 hearing. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Amanda McNutt, Jon Wardle, and Mike Wardle – all with the Brighton Corporation ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Julie Edwards iv. Written testimony: Written testimony: Joann Tima; Holly Myers; Shawn Freeman; Amanda McNutt, Brighton Corporation (response to the staff report) v. Key Issue(s): Against the proposed rezone from R-8 to R-15 due to the increase in housing density and associated impacts. In favor of 55 and older community as it shouldn’t negatively impact schools; against the proposed rezone due to the increase in density that it will allow, which will provide little transition to the low-density R-4 zoned property to the south. Belief that the developer should be held to UDC standards without deviations, including the request for over double the amount of homes as typically allowed within a gated community, reduced building setbacks and extended block face. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. Not in support of the proposed development due to the opinion that it doesn’t align with what the purpose of a mixed-use development is and the kind of live/work/play approach that is prevalent throughout the code and the City’s planning documents. The reasons are the lack of integration of uses due to the residential development being gated off with the rear of homes facing the future commercial area, lack of connectivity between uses and lack of public realm elements that are central to the mixed- use designation. ii. Generally in favor of the proposed 55 and older development but not in favor of the common driveways. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. The Commission directed the Applicant to continue to work with the City on the timing of the phasing of the amenities; that there is good faith to be able to work with the County and the City to get all permitting correct; and to provide an updated plat (i.e. concept plan) for City Council in regard to the stub street for the Murgoitio property to be incorporated at a later date if at all. (No specific changes to the recommended conditions.) Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The Applicant requests the following approvals from City Council: • Approval of a private street (i.e. E. Bingley Ln.) connection to an arterial street (i.e. S. Locust Grove Rd.). UDC 11-3F-4B.2 prohibits private street connections to an arterial street, unless otherwise allowed by the decision-making body as part of a concurrent hearing level application and approved by the transportation authority. • Approval to exceed the maximum block face standard in UDC 11-6C-3F of 1,000 feet with a pedestrian connection for Block 1, a portion of which lies along the Rawson Canal. ii. The City Council should determine if the proposed development plan should be modified to be more consistent with the general mixed use and MU-C development guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan as required by the DA. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None The applicant has submitted a written response as follows: A.1.c. The northern portion of the subject property to be rezoned (Parcel #S1406110016) shall be incorporated into a subsequent plat that includes the adjacent Murgoitio parcel (Parcel #S1406110110) located directly to the east,prior to submittal of any building permit applications for that portion of said property.,to establish a legal division of land for development purposes. Reasoning: We do not own or control the Murgoitio property and therefore should not be forced to incorporate it into our project. A.1.e. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the development except for permits associated with community amenities, including but not limited to pool, pool house, and gazebos. Reasoning: To have amenities installed and active for residents, we need to be able to start construction ahead of final plat signature. This is especially important when we need to construct certain aspects ahead of winter weather. A.2.vi. (note only) Alternative compliance application has been submitted which will remove this condition, if approved. A.2.vii. (note only) The majority of the Watkins Drain will be tiled, any portion that is not, we will ensure is a minimum of 10 feet from the pathway. 2.o. Prior to submittal of the first final plat applicationsignature of the Phase 5 final plat, the property boundary adjustment between Parcel #S1406131700, S1406427800, S1406417700 and S1406110355 shall be finalized. The Applicant shall submit proof of such in the form of an approval letter from Ada County and a recorded Record of Survey. Reasoning: The process for completing this task is outside of our control - Ada County and the rightful property owner must complete these tasks. It is unfair to hold our project outside of our control. Additionally, the only phase of the project affected by the adjustment is phase 6. 2.p. The 10-foot-wide detached sidewalks along S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Via Roberto St. shall be constructed in their entirety with the first phase of development.at the time the adjacent phase is constructed. Reasoning: The sidewalk will not connect to any existing infrastructure and needs to be constructed with each phase to make sure the roadway and grading is accurate, so the sidewalk is at the appropriate height and slope. 2.q. The 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal shall be constructed in its entirety with the second phase of development.at the time the adjacent phase is constructed. Reasoning: Again, the pathway will not connect to anything existing and should be constructed in concurrence with the phase it will provide connection for. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2024-0061, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of December 16, 2025, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2024-0061, as presented during the hearing on December 16, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2024-0061 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Item #23: Apex Zenith (H-2025-0041) Application(s):  Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 11.065 acres of land, zoned C-G, located at the southeast corner of Meridian Road and Lake Hazel Road. History: The two parcels fronting S. Meridian Road (S1406223014 and S1406223153) were annexed in 2015 with the South Meridian Annexation. These properties were given the placeholder zoning of R-4 until future development. In 2024, the property was rezoned to the C-G zoning district as a part of the larger Apex Zenith project. After the annexation the applicant submitted a property boundary adjustment to reconfigure the properties to allow for legal parcel for development. This is the reason why Costco is not included within this subdivision. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Mixed Use Regional Summary of Request: The applicant is proposing a Preliminary plat to subdivide two (2) existing parcels into seven (7) buildable lots and two private streets. The subject properties fall within the larger Apex Zenith project and are designated as Mixed-Use Regional on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The MU-R designation is intended to encourage a balanced blend of employment opportunities, retail, residential dwellings, and public uses, particularly in areas near major arterial intersections. This designation supports a diverse and integrated community where residents can live, work, and shop without needing to travel far. An important component of the MU-R designation is to avoid predominantly single-use developments. The applicant is proposing a preliminary plat consisting of seven (7) buildable lots across 11.065 acres of land. The plat excludes the additional approximately 140 acres of land as a separate plat will be required with phase two (2) of the larger development. Staff recommends the subject properties be subdivided prior to the issuance of any building permits within the subdivision. However, this subdivision is part of the first phase of the Apex Zenith project, which restricts phase one (1) to three (3) building permits prior to a more in-depth concept plan is provided. Currently, Costco will be using two (2) of the three (3) building permits, and it was previously stated that a regional employment user would be the third building permit on the west side of Prevail Avenue. For this reason, staff is recommending the subdivision be recorded and Phase two (2) of Apex Zenith be approved prior to any building permits being issued within the subdivision. The applicant has indicated the subdivision is proposed to be completed in a single phase with buildings being constructed at a later date when users are found. Each user will be evaluated when they submit for a certificate of zoning compliance application. The property is allowed to have all the uses listed in UDC 11-2B-2. As a part of the larger project, the north-south collector at the collector, known as S. Optimum Avenue, the east west collectors, known as E. Spire Street and Aristocrat Drive are required to be constructed prior the first occupancy in the development. In addition, with this application the applicant is proposing 2 private streets known as E. Tower Lane and S. Momentum Lane that are also required to be constructed. In addition, the applicant has entered into a STARS agreement with ITD for improvements to Meridian Road which includes deceleration lanes to the proposed accesses off Meridian Road. Regarding access, the applicant had two previously approved access points approved through City Council Waivers that are now known as the private streets proposed within the subdivision Commission Recommendation: Approval with no changes to the staff report Summary of Commission Public Hearing: vi. In favor: Amanda McNutt vii. In opposition: None viii. Commenting: Amanda McNutt ix. Written testimony: None x. Key Issue(s): After the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing, the applicant indicated they would like condition #5 struck from the record. Staff is not in favor of striking this condition due to the high traffic area and close proximity of the curb cuts with each other. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: iii. None Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: iii. None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. Whether to strike, amend, or keep condition #5. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Amanda McNutt – Asking for condition #5 to be struck from the staff report. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2025-0041, as presented in the staff th report for the hearing date of December 16, 2025, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2025-0041, as presented during the th hearing on December 16, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2025-0041 to the hearing date of _____ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) Item #24: Hill’s Century Farm Townhomes (H-2024-0072) Application(s):  Preliminary Plat  Rezone  Development Agreement Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 9.1 acres of land, zoned R-15 and C-N, located at the NE corner of S. Tavistock Avenue and E. Hill Park Street. History: In 2015 the subject sites were included in a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, Annexation, and Rezone. The CPAM changed the FLUM designation of approximately 87.01 acres of land from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use Neighborhood. Additionally, the applicant requested annexation of 78.62 acres of land with the R-8 and C-N zoning with a rezone of 8.39 acres of land from R-8 to the C-N zoning district. The primary driver behind the change from LDR to MU-N FLUM designation was for the incorporation of neighborhood serving use in close proximity to residential and assisted living. In addition, in 2019 the applicant applied for a modification to the conditional use permit for the assisted living shown in the original concept plan. This changes the location of the assisted living to the interior of the commercial area and within the subject properties proposed to be rezoned. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Mixed Use Neighborhood Summary of Request: The MU-N designation is intended to allocate areas where neighborhood serving uses and dwellings seamlessly integrate into the urban fabric. The intent is to avoid predominantly single-use developments by incorporating a variety of uses. The applicant requests to rezone 5.45 acres of land from C-N to R-15, a preliminary plat for 70 building lots and 18 common lots, and a development agreement modification. The subject development is proposed to be 7.8 dwelling units per acre which is within the 6 to 12 units per acre desired in the MU-N designation. The applicant’s narrative states that by rezoning the property to R-15, the FLUM designation will not be impacted as residential uses are allowed in the MU-N designation. The applicant also states that the proposed single-family attached units will complement nearby commercial and civic uses, including medical offices, retail, storage facilities, Hillsdale Elementary School, the YMCA, and Hillsdale Park. The project falls within the MU-N designation’s intended mix of 30% to 60% residential uses. The calculations provided by the applicant bring the area to 59.2% residential which is compliance with the parameters of the comprehensive plan. Additionally, detached and attached single family homes are a permitted use in the R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. This broader MU-N designation was established through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPAM) in 2015, allowing for a diverse mix of uses. The existing C-N zoning was originally part of a concept plan that envisioned three (3) commercial pad sites on the north side of the property, and a seventy-six (76) unit assisted living facility on the east side. While the R-15 portion was envisioned to be independent living. The applicant cites changing market demand as the basis for the requested rezoning and land use amendment. While staff is generally supportive of the overall concept plan, there are concerns regarding the continued reduction of commercial pad sites in south Meridian, where neighborhood-serving commercial opportunities are already limited. It should also be noted that much of the property proposed for rezoning was previously approved for an assisted living facility, a residential use within a commercial zone. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should carefully consider whether rezoning the commercial pad sites is appropriate. In addition, according to the student generation rates, the development will create forty-three (43) school aged children. Currently, the three schools that will service this area are Hillsdale Elementary School, Lake Hazel Middle School, and Mountain View High School. Both Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High are over capacity for the 24-25’ enrollment. A total of 1.76-acres (19.3%) of open space is proposed consisting of linear open space, parkways, and a shared open space greater than 5,000 square feet. In addition, Hillsdale park is directly south across E. Hill Park Street. Staff is recommending a pedestrian connection through Lot 87, Block 1 to provide better connectivity to the commercial to the north. Based on 9.1-acres, a minimum of two (2) points of site amenities are required. The applicant is proposing a picnic area on site that is greater than 5,000 square feet for a total of two (2) points, meeting the UDC requirements. Additionally, the applicant is providing pedestrian connection to Hillsdale Park to the south. Access to the proposed subdivision is off of S. Tavistock and E. Hill Park Street, both local streets. The applicant has made four (4) connection points to these local streets through three (3) private streets and one (1) alley. The applicant has submitted a private street application to run concurrently with this application to allow for the construction of five (5) private streets. Please see section E4 below for analysis on the private street standards. The applicant is proposing five (5) private streets in the form of Woodmurra Lane, Newbridge Lane, Kalinga Lane, Boswell Lane, and Stockenham Lane with this application. These private streets are depicted on the plat and have an sixty (60) foot and fifty-four (54) foot easements that spans across the full street section including thirty-three (33) and twenty-seven (27) foot street width, eight (8) foot parkways, and five (5) foot sidewalks on both sides. Written Testimony: We received written testimony from 30 citizens with concerns regarding school capacities, traffic and safety, inadequate parking, utility capacities, density, and inconsistency with the comprehensive plan. As noted above Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High schools are over capacity. The citizens described the traffic as gridlock with people doing reckless maneuvers that cause safety concerns. In addition, the citizens were concerned with the data used by ACHD which dates back to 2019. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: xi. In favor: Amanda McNutt xii. In opposition: James Phillips, Alan Harris, and Chris Johnson (Not the City Clerk). xiii. Commenting: Amanda McNutt, James Phillips, Alan Harris, and Chris Johnson xiv. Written testimony: We received written testimony from 31 citizens with concerns regarding school capacities, traffic and safety, inadequate parking, utility capacities, density, and inconsistency with the comprehensive plan. Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High schools being over capacity. The citizens described the traffic as gridlock with people doing reckless maneuvers that cause safety concerns. In addition, the citizens were concerned with the data used by ACHD which dates back to 2019. xv. Key Issue(s): Hillsdale Elementary School and Mountain View High School being over capacity, Centerville (neighboring development) has not been fully built out yet and was also rezoned to remove commercial for residential, traffic during peaks hours of the day and around major school drop off and pick up has become significant and unsafe, and the lack of commercial in south meridian for residents to use. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: iv. The commission discussed the schools being over capacity and decided to let city council make the ultimate determination on this issue. In addition, they discussed the transition from residential to commercial and whether losing additional commercial space for more residential was appropriate. The commission also discussed the viability of commercial uses without any street frontage. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: iv. None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High School being over capacity, whether losing additional commercial space for residential is appropriate, traffic in the immediate and broader area, and whether the density of the development is appropriate. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Martin Hill – Concerns over the building height as he was the gentleman that donated the land for the park and YMCA. He submitted a copy of an agreement back when the park was donated that his view would not be obstructed with future development (the city is not a party in this agreement). Sam Scranton – Concern over keeping a mix of commercial and residential. He referenced the hearing for Centerville (CBH Homes) to the west that rezoned commercial to residential further limiting commercial services in the area. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2024-0072, as presented in the staff th report for the hearing date of December 16, 2025, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2024-0072, as presented during the th hearing on December 16, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2024-0072 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) h2 City Council Meeting, 2025 th December 16 Zoning MapAerialFLUM Chinden Blvd. Zoning MapAerialFLUM RezoneAnnexation-DeAnnexation Zoning MapAerialFLUM Condition #5: “Use a shared access point between the Costco Fuel Station 0078.” -2025-and Lot 4, Block 1 off E. Tower Lane as depicted on the CZC for Costco A Zoning MapAerialFLUM w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Borough Village (H-2025-0037) by Engineering Solutions, LLP., located at 1250 E. Everest St. Application Materials https:Hbit.ly/H-2025-0037 A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to the existing development agreement (Inst. #105152707 Westborough Square) to update the use (from office to residential) and development plan for the site and enter into a new agreement for the subject property. B. Request: Rezone of 3.04 acres of land from the L-0 to the R-15 zoning district C. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of three (3) buildable lots and three (3) common/other lots on 2.81 acres of land. D. Request: Planned Unit Modification to the approved PUD (CUP-05-027) to update the development plan for the site from six (6) office buildings to 18 multi-family residential dwelling units and two (2) single-family residential dwelling units. E. Request: Director Approval of alternative compliance to UDC 11-3B-7C.1c to not provide street buffer landscaping along E. Chinden Blvd., adjacent to the site due to the location of the 10-foot wall constructed by ITD with the roadway expansion. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: December 16, 2025 ITEM # 21 PROJECT NAME: Borough Village (H-2025-0037) by Engineering Solutions, LLP., located at 1250 E. Everest St. I wish to testify Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing (mark X (Please Print) HOA? if yes) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,, DEPARTMENT REPORT .� HEARING 12/16/2025 Legend DATE: d Project Location 0 TO: Mayor& City Council :::Area of Impact = City Limits FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 sallen@meridiancity.org r7r, APPLICANT: Engineering Solutions i. _- h M SUBJECT: H-2025-0037; A-2025-0109 -- - ' Borough Village—MDA,PUD,PP,RZ, m z m � A ALT _...r....-., LOCATION: 1250 E. Everest St. and the abutting parcel to the west, in the northeast 1/4 of EF; m Section 30,TAN.,R.IE. (Parcel r1 -I f'i #S0530120610&#R1029680110) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The Applicant has submitted the following development applications: • Modification to the existing Development Agreement(Inst. #105152707 Westborough Square)to update the use(from office to residential)and development plan for the site and enter into a new agreement for the subject property; • Rezone of 3.04 acres of land from the L-O(Limited Office)to the R-15 (Medium High- Density Residential)zoning district; • Preliminary Plat consisting of three(3)buildable lots and three(3) common/other lots on 2.81 acres of land; • Modification to the approved Planned Unit Development(CUP-05-027)to update the development plan for the site from six(6) office buildings to 18 multi-family residential dwelling units and two(2)single-family residential dwelling units; and, • Alternative Compliance to the landscape standards in UDC 11-3B-7C.1c for the street buffer along Chinden Blvd. B. Issues/Waivers The Applicant requests Director approval of Alternative Compliance to the landscape standards in UDC 11-3B-7C.Ic for the street buffer along Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26(see Section III.D.3 below for more information). City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview C. Recommendation Staff: Staff recommends approval of the request for modification to the Development Agreement and Planned Development,Rezone and Preliminary Plat. The Director approved the request for alternative compliance. Commission: Commission recommends approval to City Council D. Decision Council: Pending I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/undeveloped - Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-family development - Existing Zoning L-O(Limited Office) VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning R-15 (Medium High-Density Residential) Adopted FLUM Designation MU-C(Mixed Use—Community) VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation No change proposed Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 6/23/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 3/26/2025 Site posting date 10/3/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Ada County Highway District • Comments Received Yes—no improvements are required to adjacent streets. • Commission Action Required No • Access N.Jericho Rd. (local street) ITD Comments Received Yes—no comments Meridian Fire No comments received Meridian Police No comments received Meridian Public Works Wastewater • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns See specific conditions Meridian Public Works Water • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns Ensure no trees are located within 10' of the water meter School District(s) No comments received Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:R1Ca96®11 O Date Retrieved:2025/10 16 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage In#ill Indicator: 775 Surrounding Area 162 1 % Not City ® City Limits 698.5 1,827 Not City Household Change Household&Population Growth Households f32020 Population Change:3A% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 decennial) 10,000 20,400 30,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family ® Multi-family ® Commercial Preliminary Plats(last.5-years) Conditional Use Permit{last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 101) 200 304 0 G.5 1 ■ Single-family ® Multi-family >> For Projects with Residential Units << 2-00 1,500 5ing$e-famiiy 4 Residential # 1-54 1,044 Parcel Diversity "' 1-00 0.82 0 Parcel Count v 4-50 m 544 ■Average Acres 4-00 17Fdh 09 4 a R-2 — R�8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15-00 q' . 10.81 D' 1000 4.77� 5-44 ��.02 5.8§ • 1. 4-00 22 Dwelling Units I Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 2: Service Impact Summary SerWce ImpactTools Ready Marginal Caution c CP Notes: See VIIL Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code (UDC) A. History This property was originally platted in Ada County in 2003 as part of Lot 6,Block 1, Westborough Subdivision and later annexed into the City in 2005 with L-O zoning as part of a larger development area totaling approximately 29 acres. A Development Agreement(DA)was required as a provision of annexation for the overall annexation area. The DA requires either a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)or a Planned Development(PD) application to be submitted to the City prior to future development on the site and construction of a 10' tall berm/fence or berm/wall combination along Chinden Blvd. In accord with the DA, a CUP was approved with annexation of the property for a PD,which consists of six(6)professional office buildings on the subject property site in the L-O district& 10 multi-family residential buildings on the adjacent property to the east in the R-15 zoning district containing a total of 40 dwelling units. The PD allowed for multiple buildings on a single- lot and a waiver of the street frontage requirement in the R-15 district on the abutting multi- family development to the east,which was constructed with Phase 1. The office buildings in Phase 2 on the subject property were never constructed but sewer and water main lines,pressure irrigation, asphalt drives and parking areas, and street buffer and parking lot landscaping was installed. Further development of this site was delayed due to the bank foreclosing on the property during the recession in 2008. A preliminary plat was approved with the annexation and PD in 2005,which consisted of a total of seven(7)building lots and one(1)common/other lot on 5.39 acres of land,which included the subject property and the abutting property to the east. A final plat was approved in 2005,which included six(6)buildable lots for office uses on the subject property and one(1)multi-family residential building lot on the abutting property to the east on 5.4 acres of land in the R-15 and L-O zoning districts. However,the plat was never recorded and expired. In 2008,the Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) decided to eliminate the collector street(N. Jericho Rd.) connection to Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26, located along the west boundary of this site, and ACHD vacated the right-of-way(ROW). In 2015, an application was submitted for a rezone from L-O to R-15 and modification to the existing CUP/PD to change the use and site layout for the subject property from office to multi- City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis family residential for the development of 34 townhome-style units at a gross density of 12.55 units per acre. This rezone application(and consequently the PD application)was denied by City Council due to their opinion the R-15 zone was not in the best interest of the City at that time. Reasons cited were that the density of the development proposed with the PD was too high and the entitled office uses would off-set the multi-family use approved in Phase 1. Other relevant testimony included preference for uses allowed in the L-O district such as professional office uses, a daycare facility and/or fitness facility,rather than more multi-family residential units in this area. In 2016, a short plat application was submitted consisting of two (2)building lots on 5.57 acres of land in the R-15 and L-O zoning districts,which included the subject property as Lot 1,Block 1, Borough Subdivision,the abutting property to the east and the eastern portion of the vacated right-of-way(ROW) from N. Jericho Rd. along the west boundary of the subject property. A 35' wide landscaped street buffer with irrigation, a 10' wide multi-use pathway and 10' tall berm and wall was constructed along Chinden Blvd/SH-20/26 with the subdivision improvements as required by the DA but was later removed by ITD with the road widening project. ITD acquired an additional 10 feet of right-of-way from the subject property and installed a 10-foot- tall concrete wall for buffering along with decorative rock on the south side of Chinden Blvd. in this area. Utilities were installed,which included a large transformer,underground power and a natural gas line between the back of sidewalk and the wall. B. General Overview The subject property is designated Mixed Use—Community(MU-C) on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM)included in the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of this designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to,but also walk or bike to (up to three or four miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged.Residential uses are expected to comprise between 20%and 50%of the overall MU-C development area,with gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units per acre (of the residential area). Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi- public spaces and places should comprise a minimum of 5%of the development area.Note: This property previously had a Neighborhood Center(N.C.) overlay designation, which was removed in 2019 along with other N.0 designations on the FL UM. The overall MU-C designated area,which lies mostly along the south side of Chinden Blvd./SH- 20/26,between N. Long Lake Way to a'/4 mile east of N. Locust Grove Rd., includes approximately 300 acres. A variety of uses exist in this area including churches, schools,retail stores,a storage facility,veterinary hospital, coffee shop/restaurant, indoor recreation and residential [single-family detached and multi-family(single-family attached style dwellings on one lot)] uses. Residential uses comprise less than 50%of the overall MU-C area. The site consists of a total of 2.81 acres of land, currently zoned L-O and R-15. The L-O zoned portion consists of 2.64 acres and is entitled to develop with six(6)office buildings through the previously approved PD. The R-15 zoned portion consists of 0.17 acres of land along the west boundary of the site,which is vacated right-of-way(ROW) from N. Jericho Rd. A modification to the DA is proposed to change the approved use of the property from office to residential,update the development plan for the site and enter into a new agreement only applicable to the subject property(see legal description and exhibit map below in Section VII.L for property subject to new DA). The original DA will remain in effect for the rest of the properties included in the agreement. The modification includes removal of the requirement for a berm and a fence/wall to be constructed along Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 due to ITD's road widening project,which removed the previously constructed berm and wall and constructed a 10' tall concrete wall immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. The proposed residential uses for rent City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis and sale will contribute to the variety of uses and specifically the variety of residential housing types in this area as desired in the MU-C designation. A rezone from the L-O to the R-15 district is proposed per the legal description and exhibit map included below in Section VIIX, along with an amendment to the PD to change the approved use and development plan from office,as shown below in Section VII.C,to residential. The proposed development consists of 18 multi-family residential dwelling units to be constructed as single- family-attached style homes, and two(2) single-family residential detached dwelling units at a gross density of 6.4 units per acre consistent with that desired in the MU-C designation, as shown below in Section VILE. The multi-family use is proposed to be an allowed use through the PD in accord with UDC 11-74C.1.Note:Although the multi family development consists of single- family attached style units, the use is considered "multi-family"because all units are on one (1) property,per UDC I]-]A-2 Figure 2. A preliminary plat is proposed to re-subdivide Lot 1,Block 1, Borough Subdivision and includes the vacated ROW of N. Jericho Rd. along the west boundary of Lot 1. The plat consists of three (3)buildable lots consisting of one(1)multi-family building lot and two(2) single-family building lots; and three(3)common/other lots consisting of an access drive,a parking lot and a common lot,on 2.81 acres of land as shown below in Section VII.G. The single-family lots range in size from 4,176 to 4,228 square feet(sq. ft.)with an average lot size of 4,202 sq. ft. The multi- family lot will contain nine(9) structures with 18 single-family-attached style dwellings. The gross density is 6.58 dwelling units per acre with a net density of 8.70 dwelling units per acre. Alternative Compliance is requested to the street buffer standards in UDC 11-3B-7C.1c due to existing conflicts with utilities,which prevent installation of irrigation facilities under the footings of the wall. There is no break in the wall so maintenance of the limited area of landscaping on the north side of the wall would have to take place from Chinden which the Applicant feels would be hazardous. The subject property is also considerably lower than Chinden with a significant slope into the property from the 10-foot-tall wall and a 3-foot-tall retaining wall. As alternative compliance,the developer is proposing to install nine(9)trees north of the retaining wall with shrubs,decorative boulders and rock mulch. South of the retaining wall, four(4)additional trees are proposed. The Applicant proposes to install a fenced dog park with benches and a waste station along the west side of the property and a grassy area with a horseshoe pit and benches along the east side of the property with a landscaped area behind the proposed units connecting to a pocket park area with a picnic shelter and trees,which exceeds UDC standards for common open space and amenities. Reasons cited in the Applicant's narrative supporting the proposed rezone and change of use include the lack of collector street(Jericho Rd.) access to Chinden Blvd/SH-20/26(the nearest access is circuitous via N. Saguaro Hills Ave.to Everest St., over 1,000+' to the west and north) and lack of visibility from the highway with ITD's construction of a 10' tall wall between the property and the highway,which created an isolated office zoned parcel without potential for development. The property has sat vacant and underutilized since 2008. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History AZ-05-018(Annexation—Ord.#07-1186B,DA Inst.#105152707),CUP- 05-027(Planned Development),PP-05-020(Preliminary Plat)— Westborough Square Subdivision;FP-05-075 (Final Plat—Westborough Square Subdivision)-expired;H-2015-0036(Rezone&modification to PD)—Westborough Square—denied;H-2016-0135 (Short Plat—Borough Subdivision) Phasing Plan Not proposed to be phased Residential Units i 18 Open Space 7,222 sq. ft.(or 0.17 acres) City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis Description Details Amenities Sports court(horseshoe pit) Physical Features The elevation of this site is approximately 5' lower than the adjacent state highway Acreage 2.81 acres Lots 3 buildable lots&3 common/other lots Density 6.4 units/acre(gross) Figure 4: Mixed Use Analysis by Land Use Area Designation area: P,Iixed use Regional Datm Re~trio d:2WA 426 Land Use Area by Zoning Add ress Type Split Mixed Use Area Districts ao% 50.096 iao-a% 100 p C_- Zoning Variety Acres An nexed 0.0% MO% 100.0% ® Residentiar _ Address-Zoning M ix ~ ONIMENE= Non-residential 0.09� 50.0% 11M.096 Address Use Types R esi d enti a I Add resses All Addresses ■ Single-family ❑ 303 Multi-fa m ifw '4 19 �i 114 ® Commercial Commercial Split Residen ial Unit Types Uses Ranked by Size 13 20 44 Ha me Senior care now-loaded ■ The Point at Mend is n Office,Small Alley ■ Public Storage Attached ME�g Middle ■ The Eye r sslacaates Mini Storage ■medical clinic Garden Apts. Leasable Office iokhriie - ■ Sbone Creek Dental Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis C. Site Development and Use Analysis The proposed development is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policy, Encourage diverse housing options suitable for various income levels, household sizes, and lifestyle preferences. (2.01.01) 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There are no existing structures on the subject property. Water and sewer main lines exist on the site that were installed for the previously approved development as well as paved driveways, sidewalks,parking areas with landscaped planter islands and a pad for trash enclosures. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): Multi-family residential developments are listed as a conditional use and single-family detached dwellings are a principal permitted use in the R-15 district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. However,multi-family dwellings may be an allowed use when approved through a planned unit development such as this,per UDC 11-74C.1. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Compliance with the dimensional standards for the proposed R-15 district in UDC Table 11- 2A-7 is required. 4. Planned Unit Developments (PUD) (UDC 11-7): Per UDC 11-7-1: A. The purpose of the PUD requirements is to provide an opportunity for exemplary site development that meets the following objectives: 1. Preserves natural, scenic and historic features of major importance; 2. Allows for innovative design that creates visually pleasing and cohesive patterns of development(including,but not limited to,residential development at densities greater than eight(8)units per acre where design guidelines are in place for development and where garage doors are generally not fronting the street); and 3. Creates functionally integrated development that allows for a more efficient and cost- effective provision of public services. Per UDC 11-7-4,the Council may approve PUD's upon recommendation by the Commission, in accord with the following standards: A. General use standards: 1. Deviations from underlying district requirements: No deviations are proposed. 2. Allowed uses: Multi-family developments typically require a conditional use permit in the R-15 district but the Applicant may request the use be allowed as a principal permitted use through the PUD; single-family dwellings are allowed as a principal permitted use in the R-15 district. 3. Interconnected uses: The proposed development is connected via a driveway and pedestrian walkway to the multi-family development to the east. 4. Building clusters: The proposed buildings appear to be clustered as close as possible. Compliance with the setback requirements of the R-15 district and the building code separation requirements is required. B. Private open space: A minimum of 80 sq. ft. of private usable open space is required per unit—the floor plans included below in Section VII.I depict patios over 80 sq. ft. for each unit. C. Residential use standards: 1. Multi-family: Multi-family dwellings may be an allowed use when approved through a PUD. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 2. Housing types: A variety of housing types are proposed in the planned development consisting of multi-family(single-family attached style) and single-family detached dwelling units, as required. 3. Density bonus:Not applicable D. Infill planned developments: No exceptions are requested. E. Approval: In approving the PD,the Council may prescribe appropriate conditions, additional conditions,bonds, and safeguards in conformity with the UDC that: (Staff comments in italics) 1. Minimize adverse impact of the use on other property.All homes in the development will be a single-story in height per the elevations included below in Section VII.I. Single-family attached homes are proposed next to the same to the west and single- family detached structures are proposed next to the same to the south. Only two (2) homes are proposed with retention of the existing parking lot adjacent to the existing single-story detached home on the 1-acre property to the south as a transition. Two- story townhome style multi family structures exist on the abutting property to the east. 2. Control the sequence and timing of the use. 3. Control the duration of the use. 4. Assure that the use and the property in which the use is located is maintained properly.Per UDC 11-4-3-27F, all multi family developments are required to record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features. 5. Designate the exact location and nature of the use and the property development. See the conceptual development plan included below in Section VILE. 6. Require the provision for on-site or off-site public facilities or services. 7. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required in the UDC. 8. Require mitigation of adverse impacts of the proposed development upon service delivery by any political subdivision, including school districts,which provides services within the City. 5. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): Compliance with the following specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 for multi- family developments is required: (Staff analysis in italics) B. Site Design: 1. Residential buildings shall provide a minimum setback of ten feet(10')unless a greater setback is otherwise required by this title and/or title 10 of this Code. Building setbacks shall take into account windows, entrances,porches and patios, and how they impact adjacent properties. The site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC)application should demonstrate compliance with this standard. Setbacks and building separation shall also comply with the applicable building code in effect at the time of application for building permits. 2. All on-site service areas, outdoor storage areas,waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer and utility vaults shall be located in an area not visible from a public street,or shall be fully screened from view from a public street. The site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) application should demonstrate compliance with this standard. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 3. A minimum of eighty(80)square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks, and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not count toward this requirement. In circumstances where strict adherence to such standard would create inconsistency with the purpose statements of this section,the Director may consider an alternative design proposal through the alternative compliance provisions as set forth in section 11-5B-5 of this title. The floor plans submitted with this application, included below in Section VII.I, depict patios in excess of 80 sq.ft.for each unit. 4. For the purposes of this section,vehicular circulation areas,parking areas, and private usable open space shall not be considered common open space. These areas were not included in the common open space calculations for the site. 5. No recreational vehicles, snowmobiles,boats or other personal recreation vehicles shall be stored on the site unless provided for in a separate, designated and screened area. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement. 6. The parking shall meet the requirements set forth in chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts",of this title.Based on (18) 1-bedroom units, a minimum of 27 vehicle parking spaces are required with at least 18 of those in a covered carport or garage. The concept plan depicts a total of 78 spaces with 18 of those covered spaces, which exceeds the minimum standard. An additional 16 spaces are provided in an overflow parking lot along the southern boundary of the site for use by guests and residents of Borough Subdivision, the multi family development to the east, to alleviate existing parking issues in this area (i.e.parking on this site and along Jericho Rd. and Everest St.) A minimum of one(1) bicycle parking space is required for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof. Based on a total of 94 spaces, a minimum offour(4) bicycle parking spaces are required to be provided. Three(3) concrete pads with bike racks capable of holding four(4) bicycles each for a total of 12 bicycles is proposed, exceeding the minimum standard. 7. Developments with twenty(20)units or more shall provide the following: Not applicable a. A property management office. b. A maintenance storage area. c. A central mailbox location, including provisions for parcel mail,that provide safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access. d. A directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development. (Ord. 18-1773,4-24-2018)Although not required, Staff recommends this is provided for visitors as well as emergency responders. C. Common Open Space Design Requirements: 1. The total baseline land area of all qualified common open spaces shall equal or exceed ten(10)percent of the gross land area for multi-family developments of five (5)acres or more.Not applicable 2. All common open spaces shall meet the following standards: City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis a. The development plan shall demonstrate that the open space has been integrated into the development as a priority and not for land use after all other development elements have been designed. Open space areas that have been given priority in the development design have: (1) Direct pedestrian access; (2) High visibility; (3) Comply with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CTED) standards; and (4) Support a range of leisure and play activities and uses. b. Open space shall be accessible and well-connected throughout the development. This quality can be shown with open spaces that are centrally located within the development, accessible by pathway and visually accessible along collector streets or as a terminal view from a street. c. The open space promotes the health and well-being of its residents. Open space shall support active and passive uses for recreation, social gathering,and relaxation to serve the development. Staff finds the proposed open space areas within the multi family development comply with these standards. 3. Alternative compliance is available for the standards listed in subsections(C)1 and (C)2 above, if a project has a unique targeted demographic;utilizes other place- making design elements in Old-Town or mixed-use future land use designations with collectively integrated and shared open space areas. 4. All multi-family projects over twenty(20)units shall provide at least one(1) common grassy area integrated into the site design allowing for general activities by all ages. This area may be included in the minimum required open space total. Projects that provide safe access to adjacent public parks or parks under a common HOA,without crossing an arterial roadway, are exempt from this standard.Not applicable a. Minimum size of the common grassy area shall be at least five thousand(5,000) square feet in area. This area shall increase proportionately as the number of units increase and shall be commensurate to the size of the multi-family development as determined by the decision-making body. Where this area cannot be increased due to site constraints,it may be included elsewhere in the development. b. Alternative compliance is available for these standards if a project has a unique targeted demographic;utilizes other place-making design elements in Old-Town or mixed-use future land-use designations with collectively integrated and shared open space areas. 5. In addition to the baseline open space requirement, a minimum area of outdoor common open space shall be provided as follows: a. One hundred fifty(150) square feet for each unit containing five hundred(500) or less square feet of living area.Not applicable b. Two hundred fifty(250) square feet for each unit containing more than five hundred(500) square feet and up to one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area.All multi family units are approximately 722 square feet; therefore, a minimum of 4,500 square feet(or 0.10-acres) of outdoor common City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis open space should be provided; a total of 7,222 sq.ft. is proposed, which exceeds the standard. c. Three hundred fifty(350) square feet for each unit containing more than one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area.Not applicable 6. Common open space shall be not less than four hundred(400) square feet in area,and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of twenty feet(20'). The common open space areas depicted on the open space exhibit in Section VHT F meet this requirement. In phased developments, common open space shall be provided in each phase of the development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units.Not applicable 7. In phased developments, common open space shall be provided in each phase of the development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units.Not applicable 8. Unless otherwise approved through the conditional use process, common open space areas shall not be adjacent to collector or arterial streets unless separated from the street by a berm or constructed barrier at least four feet(4')in height,with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access. (Ord. 09-1394, 3-3-2009, off. retroactive to 2-4-2009)Not applicable 9. Buffer(s): One hundred(100)percent of the landscape buffer along collector streets and fifty(50)percent of the landscape buffer along arterial streets that meet the enhanced buffer requirements below may count towards the required baseline open space.Not applicable a. Enhanced landscaping asset forth in Article 11-313,Landscaping Requirements; b. Multi-use pathways; c. Enhanced amenities with social interaction characteristics; d. Enhanced context with the surroundings. D. Site Development Amenities: 1. All multi-family developments shall provide for quality of life, open space and recreation amenities to meet the particular needs of the residents as follows: a. Quality of life: (1) Clubhouse. (2) Fitness facilities. (3) Enclosed bike storage. (4) Public art such as a statue. (5) Dog park with a waste station. (6) Commercial outdoor kitchen. (7) Fitness course. (8) Enclosed storage b. Open space: (1) Community garden. (2) Ponds or water features. (3) Plaza. (4) Picnic area including tables,benches, landscaping, and a structure for shade. City of Meridian Department Report 111. Staff Analysis c. Recreation: (1)Pool. (2)Walking trails. (3)Children's play structures. (4) Sports courts. d. Multi-modal amenity standards. (1) Bicycle repair station. (2) Park and ride lot. (3) Sheltered transit stop. (4) Charging stations for electric vehicles. 2. The number of amenities shall depend on the size of multi-family development as follows: a. For multi-family developments with less than twenty(20)units,two(2) amenities shall be provided from two(2) separate categories. b. For multi-family development between twenty(20) and seventy-five(75)units, three (3)amenities shall be provided,with one from each category. c. For multi-family development with seventy-five(75)units or more, four(4) amenities shall be provided,with at least one from each category. d. For multi-family developments with more than one hundred(100)units,the decision-making body shall require additional amenities commensurate to the size of the proposed development. 3. The decision-making body shall be authorized to consider other improvements in addition to those provided under this subsection(D),provided that these improvements provide a similar level of amenity. A total of 18 units are proposed; therefore, a total of two (2) amenities are required from two (2)separate categories. A sports court(i.e. horseshoe pit) is proposed from the Recreation category; a dog park with a waste station is proposed from the Quality of Life category; and a picnic area with a shade structures is proposed from the Open Space category, exceeding UDC standards. E. Landscaping Requirements: 1. Development shall meet the minimum landscaping requirements in accord with chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts", of this title. 2. All street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation. The foundation landscaping shall meet the following minimum standards: Not applicable a. The landscaped area shall be at least three feet(3')wide. b. For every three(3)linear feet of foundation, an evergreen shrub having a minimum mature height of twenty-four inches(24") shall be planted. c. Ground cover plants shall be planted in the remainder of the landscaped area. F. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including,but not limited to, structures,parking, common areas, and other development features. The Applicant shall comply with this requirement. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis G. Police access under exigent circumstances. Multifamily developments with units that take access via secured common corridors shall install and maintain a keyless entry system, or suitable alternative,to provide police access to the common corridors under exigent circumstances. The keyless entry system or alternative shall be subject to review and approval by the Meridian Police Department.Not applicable D. Design Standards Analysis The proposed development is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policy, Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land. (3.07.00) 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): The multi-family residential structures are required to be designed in accord with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual; single-family detached dwellings are exempt from these standards. Color conceptual building elevations with floor plans were submitted that demonstrate the quality and building materials of the proposed dwellings, shown below in Section VII.I. 2. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3G): Because the portion of the development where single-family detached dwellings are proposed is less than 5 acres in size,the open space and site amenity standards in UDC 11-3G-3,4 are not applicable.Note: The multi family portion of the development is required to comply with the common open space and site amenity standards in UDC 11-4-3-27C, D. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along E. Chinden Blvd., an entryway corridor, with landscaping per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.Noise abatement is also required for residential uses adjoining state highways per the standards in UDC 11-3H- 4D. As noted above,a buffer and wall meeting these requirements was constructed with the subdivision improvements associated with Borough Subdivision but was later removed with the road widening project,which took an additional 10' of ROW. ITD constructed a 13'+/-wide gravel parkway with a detached 10' wide paved pathway and a 10' tall concrete wall at the back edge of the pathway within the required street buffer area;the remaining 12'+/-of the required 35' wide street buffer is behind the wall on the subject property(see site photo below in Section VII.J). Alternative Compliance is requested to the street buffer landscape standards in UDC 11- 3B-7C.1c,which require a minimum of one(1)tree per 35 linear feet and shrubs,lawn or other vegetative groundcover with additional landscape design features along entryway corridors(i.e. Chinden Blvd.) as noted in UDC 11-3B-7C.3f. Due to existing conflicts with utilities,which prevent installation of irrigation facilities under the footings of the wall,no landscaping is proposed on the north side of the wall along Chinden Blvd.Additionally,there is no break in the wall so maintenance of the limited area of landscaping on the north side of the wall would have to take place from Chinden which the Applicant feels would be hazardous. The subject property is also considerably lower than Chinden with a significant slope into the property from the 10- foot-tall wall and a 3-foot-tall retaining wall. As alternative compliance,the developer is proposing to install nine(9)trees north of the retaining wall behind the 10-foot tall wall with retaining decorative boulders, shrubs/ornamental grasses/perennials and rock mulch. South of the retaining wall,four City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis (4)additional trees are proposed,which exceed the minimum standard of 10 trees.No trees or vegetative groundcover is proposed north of the wall due to lack of irrigation. The Applicant proposes installing a fenced dog park with benches and a waste station along the west side of the property and a grassy area with a horseshoe pit and benches along the east side of the property with a landscaped area behind the proposed units connecting to a pocket park area with a picnic shelter and trees in addition to the minimum required common open space and amenities. Staff recommends vegetation within the buffer area have at least 70% coverage at maturity with mulch used under and around the plants in accord with UDC 11-3B-5N. The Director finds the proposed alternative means of compliance provides an equal means for meeting the requirements that will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties in accord with the Findings in UDC 11-5B-5E. ii. Parking lot landscaping Parking lot landscaping is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses A buffer to adjoining uses is not required in the R-15 district. iv. Tree preservation There are some existing trees on the site along the driveway and in planter islands in the parking area that should be protected during construction. v. Storm integration Compliance with the stormwater integration standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11C is required. vi. Pathway landscaping There are no pathways required or proposed on the site except for the existing multi-use pathway along Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 and there isn't room for landscaping next to the pathway due to the borrow pit and wall constructed by ITD on either side of the pathway. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for the single-family dwellings proposed on Lots 4 and 5,Block 1 based on the number of bedrooms per unit.Note:Analysis on compliance with off-street parking standards for the multi family development is included above in Section C. i. Residential parking analysis There are three(3)bedrooms per unit;therefore, a minimum of four(4) spaces are required for each unit with at least two (2) of those in an enclosed garage—2-car garages are proposed for each unit with a parking pad for two(2)vehicles in front of the garage in accord with this standard. ii. Nonresidential parking analysis Not applicable iii. Bicycle parking analysis Not applicable 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations and floor plans are included below in Section VII.I. All homes in this development are proposed to be a single-story in height. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): A 6' tall vinyl privacy fence exists along the project's west boundary. A 3' tall retaining wall and 10' tall concrete wall exist along the northern boundary of the site as shown on the concept plan. 7. Parkways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-17): No parkways are proposed. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access is proposed via an existing 28' wide drive off Jericho Rd.to the east in alignment with Everest St. that lies within a 41' wide access easement on Lot 2,Block 1. Direct access via W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 is prohibited. The existing access drive and easement was approved with Borough Subdivision and provides access to the subject property and the abutting multi-family development to the east. A plat note should be included that grants perpetual ingress/egress access to Lot 1,3,4 and 5,Block 1 Borough Village Subdivision and Lot 2,Block 1,Borough Subdivision and requires maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.8. 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): There is an existing 10' wide detached multi-use pathway/sidewalk along W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 in a public use easement(Inst. #2017-113748);no other pathways are planned for this site. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): The pathway and associated easement along W. Chinden Blvd./SH-20/26 exists;therefore, the standards in UDC 11-3A-8 do not apply. 4. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): There are existing 5' wide sidewalks on this site along N. Jericho Rd. and within the site; no new sidewalks are required. There is an existing 8' wide ACHD sidewalk easement(Inst. #103137057)depicted on the plat along the west boundary of the site adjacent to the vacated ROW for Jericho Rd. that could be vacated if desired. 5. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): Private streets are not proposed. 6. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Dead end streets Not applicable as no streets are proposed and a Fire Dept. approved turnaround exists on the site. ii. Common driveways Not applicable iii. Block face The proposed plat complies with the maximum block face standards. F. Services Analysis The subject property was annexed into the City many years ago but was only partially developed and demonstrates consistency with Comprehensive Plan Policy#2.02.02,Maximize public City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe. 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): There are no waterways that cross this site. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): The Karnes Lateral provides irrigation water in this area and is under the jurisdiction of Settler's Irrigation District. The Borough and Hightower Subdivisions share a pressure irrigation pump station located east of the subject property. Pressurized irrigation systems are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): Per UDC 11-3A-18, an adequate storm drainage system shall be required in all developments in accord with the city's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the city. Stormwater drainage facilities were constructed with the previous Borough Subdivision. An existing ACHD storm drainage facility and easement encumber the site and are delineated on the plat. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Domestic water and sewer service will be provided by the City. An 8"water main line and sewer line exist in an easement(Inst. #2017-113207)in the access drive and within the drive aisle of the parking lot. The Applicant's engineer will coordinate with Public Works to abandon some of these services and install additional services for the proposed structures. The utility plan depicts the existing improvements on the property and modifications to the sewer and water service to serve the proposed development. Per UDC 11-3A-21, all utilities and street lights shall be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Adequate fire protection shall be required in accord with the appropriate fire district standards. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division Development Agreement Modification/Rezone 1. A new DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s), and the developer. The subject property identified in the legal description in Section VII.L shall no longer be subject to any previous agreements(i.e. Inst. #105152707—Westborough Square AZ-05-018). The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision& Order for the subject application. The DA shall,at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: i. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the conceptual development plan and building elevations,preliminary plat, common open space and amenity exhibits submitted with this application and the provisions contained herein. Preliminary Plat: 1. Include a note on the plat stating the access easement on Lot 2,Block 1 grants perpetual ingress/egress to Lots 1, 3,4 and 5,Block 1,Borough Village Subdivision and Lot 2,Block 1,Borough Subdivision to the east. The note shall include a requirement for maintenance of a City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C- 3D.8. 2. The street buffer area shall have vegetation with at least 70%coverage at maturity with mulch used under and around the plants in accord with UDC 11-3B-5N. 3. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. 4. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1) obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings; or obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. Planned Unit Development: 5. The multi-family development is allowed as a principal permitted use in the R-15 district through the planned unit development as allowed by UDC 11-7-4 and does not require approval of a conditional use permit. 6. Compliance with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 shall be required for the multi-family development. 7. Compliance with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district shall be required. 8. All multi-family residential structures shall comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. Single-family detached structures are exempt from these standards. 9. All multi-family residential buildings shall provide a minimum setback of ten feet(10') unless a greater setback is otherwise required by this title and/or title 10 of this Code per UDC 11-4-3-27B.1. Building setbacks shall take into account windows, entrances,porches and patios, and how they impact adjacent properties. Building setbacks and building separation shall also comply with the applicable building codes in effect at the time of application for building permits. 10. Provide a directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development for visitors as well as emergency responders. Depict the location of the directory and map on the site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 11. All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development, including,but not limited to, structures,parking, common areas, and other development features per UDC 11-4-3-27F.A copy of the recorded document shall be submitted prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy within the development. 12. Parking lot landscaping is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-8C and shall be depicted on the landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions 13. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted for the multi-family development and approved by the Planning Division prior to submittal of application(s)for building permits. 14. "No Parking"signs shall be installed along the common entry driveway shared with the multi-family development to the east and enforcement of such is required. B. Meridian Public Works https:llweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=413399&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC iv C. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=414330&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC Lty D. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) https:llweblink.meridianciN.oLgzl ebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=416860&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky E. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=413734&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC iv V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment to the R-15 zoning district and conceptual development plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan in that it's consistent with the uses and density desired in the MU-C designated area. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development plan complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district as the R-15 district in that it provides for a range of housing opportunities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including but not limited to school districts. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the request is for a rezone, not annexation. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings B. Preliminary Plat(UDC-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and will be consistent with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the above-noted conditions. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds thatpublic services are available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. C. Planned Unit Development(UDC 11-7-5) Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a planned development request,the Council shall make the following findings: 1. The planned unit development demonstrates exceptional high quality in site design through the provision of cohesive, continuous,visually related and functionally linked patterns of development, street and pathway layout,and building design. The Commission finds the proposed modification to the planned unit development demonstrates a high quality through the provision of cohesive, continuous, visually related and functionally linked patterns of development and building design. 2. The planned unit development preserves the significant natural, scenic and/or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic and/or historic features that need to be preserved with development. 3. The arrangement of uses and/or structures in the development does not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. The Commission is of the opinion the proposed modification to the previously approved conceptual development plan and uses will not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. The proposed concept plan demonstrates a good transition in uses to adjacent residential uses. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 4. The internal street,bike and pedestrian circulation system is designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles,bicyclists and pedestrians without having a disruptive influence upon the activities and functions contained within the development,nor place an undue burden upon existing transportation and other public services in the surrounding area. The Commission finds the existing internal driveways and pedestrian circulation are designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians without having a disruptive influence upon the activities and functions within the development, nor place an undue burden upon existing transportation and other public services in the surrounding area. The additional overflow parking will assist in mitigation of the existing parking burden that has negatively affected adjacent properties in the area. 5. Community facilities, such as a park,recreational, and dedicated open space areas are functionally related and accessible to all dwelling units via pedestrian and/or bicycle pathways. The Commission finds the proposed dedicated open space areas and amenities are functionally related and easily accessible to all dwelling units via the means noted. 6. The proposal complies with the density and use standards requirements in accord with chapter 2, "District Regulations", of this title. The Commission finds the proposed development complies with the density and use standard requirements in UDC 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district and with the MU-C designation in the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The amenities provided are appropriate in number and scale to the proposed development. The Commission finds the proposed amenity plan for the multi family development consisting of a sports court(i.e. horseshoe pit) and the provision of one(1) additional amenity will be appropriate in number and scale to the proposed development. 8. The planned unit development is in conformance with the comprehensive plan. The Commission finds the proposed amendment to the planned unit development is in conformance with the comprehensive Plan. D. Alternative Compliance(UDC 11-513-5E) In order to grant approval for an alternative compliance application,the Director shall determine the following: 1. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or The Director finds it's not feasible for the Applicant to fully comply with the street buffer landscape standards in UDC 11-3B-7C due to ITD's improvements, which include a 10 foot- tall wall within the buffer area. 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and The Director finds the proposed alternative compliance provides an equal means for meeting the requirements. 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. The Director finds the proposed alternative means of compliance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed development agreement modification,PUD modification,preliminary plat and rezone applications in accord with the Findings in Section V. The Director approved the alternative compliance request in accord with the Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on October 16 and November 20, 2025. At the public hearing on November 20,2025,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject PUD, PP and RZ requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Becky McKay,Engineering Solutions; Jack Harriff b. In opposition: Drew Robert representing HOA,Forrest Spencer c. Commenting: Tyler Rountree d. Written testimony: Melissa Chandler,Melinda&Ray Akhbari, Ginne Hostvedt&John Elliott e. Staff presenting gpplication: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Safety concerns for children&pedestrians with the increased traffic, inadequate parking_, increased traffic volume on surrounding roads not designed to handle the volume,increase in noise in the quiet neighborhood,incompatibility with surrounding land uses, and strain on City services&infrastructure. b. Desire for a traffic signal at the Saguaro Hills& Chinden Blvd/SH 2O-26 intersection. c. In favor of cleaning up the site with the proposed development. 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission a. Installation of"No Parking' signs along the entry drive to reduce congestion. b. In favor of the extra parking proposed with this development to alleviate existing parking issues in the area. c. Encouragepplicant to continue to work with the abutting Hightower HOA to improve the strip of land that is vacated ROW on their property for a larger shared common area between the two developments. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Include a new condition requiring"No Parking' signs to be installed along the common entry driveway shared with the multi-family development to the east and for enforcement of such. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action ' 1 1 ,�.' Via.I �wl .t �y•� . � - - �! _,•� -. _ e, ix CHINDEInd N` r Z1Pf�� ►♦ • -,� - �. ��i+lrinrl+rl n*gin■=.�.'".ns 1111.r.• •- -•�f�l llt�i ��/'�1■■�w�.■11■aA� ��`�`I�♦/��/ . ',.,��i`� ■��fill lii �_�■�. �■�M■�■■■�� 11��■■1 � •.,♦'�•�� .•� -- CHINDEN= euulA ■ip7q_p1► ■n■ SV�f■ I - � = wunl■f Illril� '��-.�=■mm�a■_�. ��is�1/ r = � `e'1lle ululnxuu= n■■uu��ulna e. .� W �iiA�il 1 ��moon �� 1 ♦i4 � �■e.+e III ■ � :, �'��.■` . ��■ _ 1 a■ ■dlr S .�:�� :� nn119n■ 11■�==uual_=t �� ■■■�■ � �..�■o r ri1i��flOr ■■ Z 1 1!:'e - ' Ira■■ 1��. ■it li1l so��f IIi n�P■1 1 �� f■f — r N, ■ �A r■ a ��I=:. is 1 111111■1 ■I � 1*f� �.urn • 1 11�j�+r�= 41 li F!y ■��.r, rr�■lrrr■rr�■� 1♦�fl IIII�Ii IR�m ��■�iiiii!r♦�■■ ��► R1N. 1 �� ■.■rur■ p♦ r■ 1 ,Illlllillls Sr��*�� ■■:in ♦Pi ♦• �. Q unnlw�■ ■ ■ 2. a `r�G olrs■• � I H nulrr:::�' ::� ■�■ nul IIIIIIIIAII�� ■�s'I=Irurtl'*`f In ♦I /q � . m_ �. ■.�p■■,: mnnnnnom■t(/} �1♦■a>•fnlnurs ■■ ." Nja>.�11 n■�IIIIn n■►� ., ��.,� \{ � grin ♦ ♦ Inn=:■ ■■nu. rrwn�■: .. ■■lu■�` .`:1 IIm � IN mni- :' rns►. nn�■��ono rir■�V ��■•■fnurppnin:=:: ■111111►�� rrr111 OOuor.. Ili%iunrr�urmu �l 1�%/Iun�1:n�uur:ullmnlri... O r• 11 ►fs p nir� us. C ��■o■ ■■■■■■■�■■�I� ►�►�.nr■■rrs "ri. � �i i ii■ [{� J=�*■�i��■■Y/i 111Jf1■■, sir �■ii1 i • 4� ��■■ ■■■■ r r�_� �ai i�■ ■11r11■111q�■■IS i.�i�1%�.■■■■f �■ w■,■■■■� A111119I, t � rr■ ■l��Y�r rI yri♦ If■1■r%n■r■�. ° °i f o f not nnrl►� �C C=L_.....�. � _ �u moo °i.�...7■aun auu■ oG _ rr. I�orr■r� r� r� •+1.:n .°°♦��.'■m'■■■uu■ o ._■a �:CGar■.\ uo■� ■ .r r.� r��.J �� ♦ Ir. o�i ♦ �G i ■ii�:l��I ■■■�ii.■�b i:::iil■lii��a�♦i ♦innl\7--...�. \°�sad �� .. n■�r�-' ■!■■..■1�J- 1�is■r■s■rs for■ ■nmur►F •pinul■■��uiil7il,■i17i f�. .�� 1 i ��tlll 4•r■rrr 1■■■r%' RYil�rrl� �11■Iflr■r■rLar■urrr' I�°I fjlrlll�. • /1 •�!riraa lR�r.� •C -. .. :,�� , L■■■■�I�r■�■/ �■■ �� '`�'s�iriei�+aal1� '4�'Ry =='- mil J�%� ! �:':r.:��11��;. •��•,��` �■�r ..1� ---- CHINDEN' �II �I 1► w. .,-RG� •� • _ ■'-'■- _ p non■• ■�: ■ �►f-�' um unnnmw_ l ■■uulwu- .��`- riI►�aid 11 *�i►11 11111- � ■■��r� -�.��► 1 si��tl111 - '��w+r �� nElrlllnxr� ■■P?�-' riw. U■Iai Ullr -�~p♦~:■ IIIIiP'==■,� iVo m �l161R11 11.► �NNj��fry ■ :rrri♦ N��: Z .■a nq■nluua ISBN - an !r■I► •� ♦ a I♦ -�_� / 1 ■1111111■ y�,111111 ■a 1��p� rrr r1Jl Q r nT^.:` ■::nm!■.■. ��IIIIIII � �� ::wi is 3 �j ii< ♦�♦�i- 1"1 Eol nnml►:•.. ■ ■ ::'C�:■IIIIIIIII n!r .!! ♦♦♦ ♦♦ � 1 unu�1..r ::r r..■G N.1 `.■. lrr,i it■.. � \r ♦ `♦/ Q ■■.. w■ � ' uu7�IIIIIIIII � ■ lrl ■ •_^^r �! �'♦'♦♦♦��i ►►fir � nn w�.■��. . i iii:■'::nn1�omll � ��■ ini+�� ' •''� :Il'i�: '►i♦i`♦♦ J�rJir np mm .�■■ Aur 1 ='iinu ►i�Ji►�►*♦�♦♦ii♦ 1>r� W 'i .. lriiil�■'� ■nn � ■. , rn11u lin.%::��1: ��< ►♦i♦iyi�gr••r ■n ■ m n�n rNo. ■n�nrnl■:u■1■■rr... r. ran III W ♦►it ! .)■�i■a V ' - s - • as .•�•ii■ni�!.u"S•:�:: e - • - • ter.Aml um was rrnnull ' ►i►fi,unu�r►Indi,'■illu■ n � uur�i�run�r � err morn nuun■■r' ♦rur own Him i ME �NI •1`�nra. nr��r� +: �r��FI11pr1s>■� rra/• �j•N � Z1lI ••• • ' JI Ir � ■�■tw■■/IIIIIII■. �j �1�� , _�■.��i-■1 ■■�■ � �� ►II■■ire\�■I■.■ .�� ♦ L— —.� ��M■�� _�r _Geis /1��1�■ �CHIND,EN �_--2_�iiiliifinunl■q �III� w� rr r.rR 11111111 Illillllllli�+J _ 1 =.1�■��- �•� ■ _=e lii�1�=�= IYllllnl■'-�-� 111■11r1i■-_-� �•-�a Ii it i Gt�,Imidn s=Innn=-1{n= ■■Ir :nmm� - ► i1Jf fA■p1 11111lIIFr�II � ■■■--�-num- -■� 11111 � C��..� 1 ai Iry H11r " :��+i ---.'�I'c:-inn.■EI{rn■� IIe s■_'-wins=;;�=: ■n■■■ ' ■-■:. n■Jai rlllr, ...�I��..I i i.� all A■- V■■ununm nuuumi:� ■ i�7e7� — ul.N ♦ IIJ��frnr G :Grp •i1'wq�: � __ .,lal-3 1I■n!lrui alvarll• 1111111■1�■Mi �� ■r•4 •�'��► r� •�►furl r -■e,■Lz' t�� r�nlu!■�w��• ^fl 11111■�IIIrI� �� nn!r►�■■Il,if GIB\� �R��pi�-1►1►►I��Q'iun n� mur..-. fi�•II 1111111■IP�n� ■r o!• �■■■ 1 •i ♦ � •c i-i,■muin nnml► ■u:.■��- 1 1 lrs,••:■- �♦ ♦ ►pq•7liiul-= �nnnnnlr •■!■■.urll� IIIIIIIIIIIIdW A• : pf'�1'.::. a� yr •♦♦�♦►JIf►J yl AII�?�s��• ■1■_ i is is Im11�r1111llnUrr� �■ nll�'i■■: N r ►i,♦4i♦♦�ii�r►UyJ�A•p�=��r�_ i■- nri�.:'. !1:mlll u�r`.. , �f�■u non r ��iin'ili ►i O rur rw:- rin■ 4 ry•♦ ♦♦ Ira �, -_mm9--:. ■-:�/n■1 rn■r .r�+ ■ n■r-.:� 11 p♦ ►'��`♦♦f♦ p-_—._—Winne i�r„�- m1, Ea�!_cn C�nnuu ;air■u �dr� Ii-�Irmii rii�illiiil�fim _•11111 ��- aw w■ • Illlllrl, + �A� 1■an Cwrnrrr-I• � - ..�I � I A■�■11111 1111 ��I�� _ ■■ell■!11 .�\=Cuuq�p iuun ♦ �i�g ?-r___p 11111 ;i6 ♦♦ _ ■■■► I Im {GIIIII a •� ♦ .q!!.■ ♦ICY.. ♦♦I ��4♦�♦i �� - g � 1 mw s .A A�� per-. •-. ♦ ma-wun � r � �=� -_ I y\p�Ilni►f 1!!! = ��Va it ii i.�r►*i ili�1■�: iU■in;:��.-��A-1 ■D��r��yi rf nil -�%�'♦i♦♦ :�.��1■■. mn!! E■■h, ♦ r n■ ►Aunup�m�r--ui cs=L7[iCn if■■n ■lllnl ♦ ran■■11,.■llim �:■r■ �fiu► � RmLJ� kl m■rn■uuua■■ •tllr f o hfiOr�ON d* h l I .a South side of Access Drive: A AL EF way F ^c3 i_ s iot�3�S:Yt_ d Looking southwest City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL R1029680110 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 27 49th Percentile Description Location In City Limits GREE 9r Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft. from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. RED Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of future transit route YELLOW Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master street= YELLOW plan) > existing (# of lanes) & road IS in 5 yr work i,lar School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile dri•:inc; GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED Report generated on M-06-2025 by MERIDIAN\sallen City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Existing Conceptual Development Plan Approved with Planned Unit Development CkArjg LIe,puaw f F E LU KI _ Lll-1 Ir JL _Y T { - a rr i' OF City of Meridian i Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Proposed Conceptual Development Plan(dated: 8/27/25) c�aiu�`sd ws�x ou ne�Ib mli°nwu�ie�eiliv u = o J 3J c � Ln eo xourc vex Harew,-,tom o I a o -'SN0►111mq and AHVNIw113dd �" " w NOI3IAIaH[ls g WCE aaoD3a�0 sd3NMD d3d01]A]U 13VIN00 i a3NNT6 9N1833IN160 :T9vTIIA 19f)W IO$ 02 - 99MQ £� is - s 2 - At p I f1L51 Xf9L90d5 � _._ m ;,�}. - ❑ �1�? 9f �-I � ��i �I IE�JI � � ICI° ° . 10 " ! � j I � 1 I fu e ❑ API. 1 1 ❑ a `a 19 ' a w _ r a'Icl v§s6 aN C960E�Iwl'ONAVM vraldnaer'x AMf-3'I-ll191a®LYJpA Y }IIIIII III ' ------------ -_ ��- ------ -- --�--- L Jh!il f4'YLi 3,55,6Z4x� --� L�li li �I If I II II IV -NAAr.t3mCii.l I_11 I II I I City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Common Open Space& Site Amenity Exhibit E.CHINDEN BLVD.(HWY.20126) N I � � ❑ L o ❑ J , --- w ❑ HI BOROUGH I SUBDIVISION 4851sf 2371sf L _ r E.EVEREST STREET _ COMMON oRry C 0 Il II L WESTBOROUGH SUBDIVISION 4851sf 2371 sf 7222/18 = 401.29f OPEN GRASS AREA EXHIBIT BOROUGH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION 1" — BO' A RESUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF BOROUGH SUBDIVISION, NE 1/4 OF SECTION 30, T.4N., RAF., B.F., MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHC P-E 1 !W ' ex LA rx� m — HOR55E55HOE FIT City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Preliminary Plat(date: 8/27/2511/10/25) s�x =- tl.. �. "SN�1lA7US' °sir d Aau�lvrin�a ` =" LLJ Nv181AlQ (Ia0034dasdauu,o �63aoi3n3o 10vwoOhENnnnd U1Y!l1MA116H4 3svTIinHanOHouoH •+ s Y J SY'JJJ p5 8 f F m T P A ., � �s5� �e��s�� a�`�3 a•3 6W�k � '� Y� ��' S i =s a� _ SIZSI Ils4�uQ5 • �— —/ b RE 1-7 - -I I i , , , , , I' i , i I ...i- I-.; sly n •I .rrr.-,� "� ;� ; , I - ; , , I , i - - -- --- _ _ - x tl ) e P6� � I r z _ s , , , , I I 1 � )y I. r _ 4 : _I 1. a❑7 ' r f f g u u H - - __ r ......_.... =a III _ _ �S � [9eom[n�[vx-uxn � �, g � r�'' $ • ,-M 3,5s.vffl '- s�our� W �i�rtrs�rai� City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits ecu�i mo�•"i�� ]`..�,��o.w's ci�a:..u N.'i', %�.3i nw`arsr�mpi�re � �_!4 Y � ' Nn°•,.'rea•U.3:P°" .,,,; x +•nxn a.as .sa.. 'r.S�Q�ln7Qsa. n cn NV1 d 311 SON119 X3 (Ia0W8d08EIHMO 'V ld IIA30 ICNNCO/d3NWd 3 9NIHMNIAU 3!)VTIl HjnQgpg a W '. y I I �A i = r \} "lee, _ qF ... l + W v f 1 4 5Y e 3 ----------- r2 e C� .ir.0 �ss.ezce+ ne.�a3 wnc_oi .n ews�ro a�oua. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits H. Landscape Plan(dated: 9/2/2510/24/25) x k NV�d 3dVOSOV d111r1d Aa dNIWll3ad w _ i a e tiA oHVa!'NVKX9VY 3�d��1A Honoaoe } - - - o { n€ H e r ►I a rV'9 _ .. lu 3351 == Effl, � w N. , 1z Al ............. - ................. - $ V _ �.. I • 0 t _ E I a a�FE City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits g �4 NH�d @dVWV�lifld A61dN�VFl3�fd oHaai'nr UUah F sx 7 F J =a .... W a E 2od��1A Honoaos =x �R a gg p5�ak jell :R1111 VIP i "N pp y(yj a u - pp C 3�� @S yy� �� jNA 0 � L p goo ]LI e � � 41 �j I 01 HIM 1% 4 � I T a ------------- � I I City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits I. Building Elevations BOROUGH VILLAGE a a FRONT l rid&, - �� mmm ?IGHT BACK LEFT • • • • 0 • BODY,ADJ.TRIM B&B,ADJ.TRIM FASCIA,SOFFIT, DOORS ROOFING STONE Tornado Wind Black Licorice COLUMNS Billowing Smoke Black Asphalt Black Forest RD 0584 RD 0529 Silent Sea RD 0583 Profit Alpine RD 0515 Ledgestone CBH HOMES 0 0 � N 00 0 ® ® m 00 00 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits THE HARLQW 1364 cBH I;ien—auc 3 l 12 P 12-3 6� GRILL 10,X 10, m EAT VLTD CLG (1g aM LIVE 10,X9' El F!11 FARMHOUSE MODERN 13'X13' VLTD CLG u'x1a' --- COOK B •. = VLTD aG ♦p 0 IVX11' _— 3 %E . PLAS �� J lip O SLEEP 2 W aG iTX9' BUNGALOW COTTAGE OPT.PARK 3 CAR GREET e'LLG SH O PARK el 2 CAR 2 SLEEP 3 - ..........,, ee 1111i 10'X 9' TV oo❑ ❑❑Col Q MAIN LEVEL NOTE:FURNACE CRAFTSMAN TRADETJONAL INSTALLED IN ATTIC 'Floor plan Fryers are for Illustrative purposes only.We're always working to make our LBH floor plans even better,Hoar plans are suhfecl to change and awllable sped homes may have variations that are chferent than the floor plans and options shown on till flyer.Lommonophons are shewn as red dots and mayaotbe included In the available spa home.Community specific requirements ands elevations styles may cause elevation details,masonry,and window placement variations. Roam dimensions and ceiling heights are approsimated based on main roam-defining wefts. Buyerand huyer'sagent to verify all room dimensdons and avallable spec home specific floor plan detellsand options.See a LBH Sales SpecialEstfor details.Marketed by LBH Salesaad Marketing,Inc.RCE-g23. Updaled11.79.24 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Chinden Blvd.Photo .�� «� PET HOSPITAL ZCA City 1 � *�°� ��y� ice.•�4 _ _ 4 �.rYa of MeridianDepartment Re 11Exhibits K. Rezone Legal Description&Exhibit Map Legal Description Borough Village Subdivision -- I -15 Rezone A parcel being located in the NE 1/4 of Section 30, Township 4 North, Ranee 1 East. Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commending at a Braisa Cep mon urn ent marking the northwest corner of said NE '/4, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 30 bears S 8905142" E a distance of 26 34.00 feet. Thane along the northerly boundary of said NE ' S 88°51'42' E a distance of 1292.00 feat to the POINT OF BECINNIN ; Thence continuing along said northerly boundary,also being the northerly boundary of the City of Meridian City Limits S 89d51'42° E a distance of 27.00 feet to a paint; Thence leaving said northerly boundary of said NE Y4 and continuing along said City Limits S Q`29'55'W a distance of 40-00 feet to a point; Thence continuing along said City Limits S 89651'42" E a distance of 295.44 feet to a point; Thence leaving said City Limits and along a line being the easterly boundary of Lot 1, Block 1 of Borough Subdivision as shown in Book 112 of Plats on Pages 16440 through 16442, records of Ada County, Idaho, aid the extension thereof, S 0°08-25°W a-distance of 192.13 feet to an angle point; There continuing along the easterly boundary of said Lot 1, Block 1 the following described Courses: Thence S 22°47'49" W a distance of 110.95 fee#to a point; Thence N 89130'04" W a distance of 11.71 feat to 2 paint. Thence S 0°29'56"VVa distance of 143.49feetto a point marking the southeasterly corner of said Lot 1, Blgck 1; Thence along the sarrtherly boundary of said Lot 1, Block 1 and the extension thereof N W30'04" W a distance of 269.83 feet to a point on the centerline of N. ,Jericho Road. Thence along said centerline and the westerly boundary of Said Lot 1, Block 1 N W29'55" E a distance of 476.24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, This parcel contains 3.04 acres and is Subject#0 any easements c, T existing or in use. _ Clinton W. Hansen, RLS Land Solutions, PC p c June21, 2026 ' 0�7 4 VV , P Boraugn Village—R•15Re+�zom land 3uM�lW and Cone 4 dab No 25.45 pNe� 1 of 1 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits BOROUGH VILLAGE - R-15 REZONE - EXHIBIT LOCATED IN THE NE ]* OF SECTION 30, T4N, RlE BM. CITY Ar MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO BASIS 7e _G T_ � BL� a 3 109�Byk 2k+ _ _ . . _q � 2U a POINT �± e BEGINNING moLANcFrY LIMITS I % k PROPOGEDBOROUG m7 E REZONE / m / AKA -a &M ARKS % LINE TABLE ® \ LINE LERGTH BSA # kLl J» S139-51E / U m« g s% L . 9 e mw na-X04_W \ \ � LO LO %ST & � $ � Lind d olut@ons E � & ^ �suR"frgend�k]A§ o ¥¥ , M4 W. _ . 12K m,_ p,_mr� City of Meridian Department Reprt V11. Exhibits L. Legal Description&Exhibit Map for Property Subject to New Development Agreement Legal Description Borough Villaae Subdivision A parcel being a resubdivksion of a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Borough Subdivision as shown in Book 112 of Plats on Pages 16440 through 18442, records of Ada County, Idahe, located in the NE '. of Section 30, Township 4 North, Rartge 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows, Commencing at a Brass Cap monument mark ing the northwest comef of said NE ' , from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northeast corner of said Section 30 bears 89°51'4 " E a distance of 2634.00 feet; Thence along the northerly boundary of said NE '/4 89'51'42" E a distance of 1292.00 feet to a point; Thebnce leaving said northerly boundary S 0°2-9'55"W a distance of 70-00 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way of E. Chiriden Blvd, and the POINT OF BEGINNING Thence continuing along said right-of-way S 0°29'55" W a distance of 10.00 feet to a point; Thence continuing along said right-of-way S 89°51'42 E a distance of 322.69 feet to a point on the easterly boundary of said Lot 1, Block 1 of Borough Subdivision; Thence along said easterly boundary the following described ccurses, Thence S 0°08' 5" IN a distance of 152.13 feet to a point; Thence S 22°47'49" W a distance of 110-95 feet to a point; Thence N 89°30°04" W a distance of 11.71 feet to a point; Thence S 0°29'56"W a distance of 14 3.4 9 feet to a point marking the southeasterly corner of said trot 1, a lock I; Thence along the southerly boundary of said Lot 1, Block 1 N 89'30'04* VV a distance of 242.83 feet to a point marking the southwest career of said Lot 1, Block 1. Thence along the westerly boundary of said Lot 1, Block 1 N 0629'56" E a distance of 181-90 feet to a point; Thence continuing along said westerly boundary and the extension thereof N 89u46'37" VV a distance of 54.00 feet to a point on the westerly horfndary of the vacated N. Jericho Road Lan of ljltions aarnuga wage Sub 25-on Job M. 35-�5 �__ ��am.� ow �Weo page 7 of 2 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Thence aIong said westerly undary N 5 E ad UB nce of 27443 feet to a Pb% on the sou therlyrigrh# ofw CEO en Blvd ; Thence -along d southerly right-of-way S8 514 Eadistance m 27.00 feet to be POINT OF BEGINNING. This p cel contains /S] acres. m em 2 . DH%nW. Han eR RLS ;,I- LA � Land Solutions, PC ° eer - RE SE? August 2 o � \ 4 1 lop z y o� »ON W. ¥5 &m#w�S_ m dSolu n tJon ,e m �-4� Page,r2 City of Meridian Department Reprt V11. Exhibits BOROUGH VILLAGE SUBDIVISION - EXHIBIT A RESUBDIVISION OFAPORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1OFBOROUGH SUBS 2S|ON, BEINQLOCATEDINTHE NE1M OFSECTION 30, T4N, RIR B8, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO p hg « Em@ ENS g� @ . & SM"E , JB «# ,a - - - - - - $ 13i& z '342- » a _ > PUNT m�-�#7 � S @ = 2gm'7 »zey % q @ ® mCPaS BOROUGH / A»E SUBDVISIm / 8 AREA = ze ACRES kLINE TABLE ¥ \ u£ 2<e "A \ 2 eA k 5sw 7 j § m& qq' ■ L . d 2 ¥ �� W - k a J& �9'E } R � LLJ 2 � � 2� / \ ) Nm'' I83 - — Q `LA Ae&f � sT'- � o � ° Z £ � foils | @ Land Survong and C2m g i 59 10n 20 �Q or §¥ ». e � W. �� ID WA2m� City of Mell*pI Department Report Vttxƒi! VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES & DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days.Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development, government,and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2<5.0; R-4<2.0; R-8< 1.0; R-15 <0.5; R-40<0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan(e.g.pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources, including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Apex Cadence (H-2024-0061) by Brighton Corporation, generally located south of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and west of S. Locust Grove Rd., including 6575 S. Locust Grove Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0061 A. Request: Modification to the existing Development Agreement (Inst. 42020-178120) to replace it with a new agreement for the subject property and to include specific design requirements. B. Request: Annexation of 0.86 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district. C. Request: De-Annexation of 0.52 acres of land from the City to Ada County. D. Request: Rezone of 56.11 acres of land from the R-8 to the R-15 zoning district. E. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 228 single-family residential building lots, 41 common lots and 16 other lots on 51.50 acres of land in the proposed R-15 zoning district with private streets in the gated portion of the development. F. Request: Planned Unit Development with a request for deviations to certain street, side, and rear yard building setbacks and to allow more than 100 dwelling units in a gated community. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: December 16, 2025 ITEM # 22 PROJECT NAME: Apex Cadence (H-2024-0061) by Brighton Corporation, generally located south of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and west of S. Locust Grove Rd., including 6575 S. Locust Grove Rd wish to testify Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing (mark X (Please Print) HOA? if yes) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �E DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT �✓ �r HEARING 12/16/2025 DATE: " TO: Mayor& City Council ---- FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 sallen@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Brighton Corporation SUBJECT: H-2024-0061 Apex Cadence(aka Pinnacle)—ALT, Legend MDA,PUD,PP,RZ, PS Project Location Area of Impact LOCATION: 6575 S. Locust Grove Rd.,in the NE 1/4 4= City Limits e of Section 6,T.2N.,R.1E. (Parcel O Analysis #S 1406110355 &a portion of #S1406110016) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The Applicant has submitted the following applications: • Modification to the existing development agreement(Inst. #2020-178120)to replace it with a new agreement for the subject property and to include specific design requirements; • Annexation of 0.86 acres of land with an R-15 zoning district; • De-annexation of 0.52 acres of land from the City to Ada County; • Rezone of 56.11-acres of land from the R-8 to the R-15 zoning district; • Preliminary Plat consisting of 228 single-family residential building lots,41 common lots and 16 other lots on 51.5-acres of land in the proposed R-15 district with private streets in the gated portion of the development; and • Planned Unit Development with a request for deviation to certain building setbacks and to allow more than 100 dwelling units in a gated community. NOTE: The staff report has been updated in strike-through and underline format,including revised exhibits,that reflect the changes since the Commission hearing. B. Issues/Waivers The Applicant requests the following approvals from City Council: • Approval of a private street(i.e. E. Bingley Ln.)connection to an arterial street(i.e. S. Locust Grove Rd.). UDC 11-3F-4B.2 prohibits private street connections to an arterial street, unless otherwise allowed by the decision-making body as part of a concurrent hearing level application and approved by the transportation authority. City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview • Approval to exceed the maximum block face standard in UDC 11-6C-3F of 1,000 feet with a pedestrian connection for Block 1, a portion of which lies along the Rawson Canal. C. Recommendation Staff. Approval per the conditions noted in Section IV below. Commission: Approval with no changes D. Decision Council: Pending II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Agricultural - Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential detached&attached dwellings - Existing Zoning V R-8 (Medium-density residential) VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning R-15 (Medium high-density residential) Adopted FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR);Medium-High VII.A.3 Density Residential(MHDR);Mixed-Use Community (MU-C) Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 9/23/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/6/2024 Site posting date 12/3/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/ Description/Issue Reference Element Ada County Highway District • Comments Yes - Received • Commission No - Action Required • Access S. Locust Grove Rd. and E.Via Roberto St. - • Traffic Better than"B" Level of Service TIS Required No ITD Comments Yes Received Meridian Public Works Wastewater • Distance to Available at site Mainline • Impacts or See Public Works' site-specific conditions Concerns City of Meridian Department Report 11. Community Metrics Meridian Public Works Water • Distance to Available at site Mainline • Impacts or Each phase of development will need to be modeled to verify minimum fire flow Concerns pressure is maintained. See Public Works' site specific conditions. School See comments in the public record District(s) Capacity& School Boundary Areas 24-25'Enrollment Architectural Program - Number of Capacity Capacity Students Mary McPherson Elementary 495 675 550 Enrolled Victory Middle 1075 loon - Mountain View High 2475 2175 Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions for comments received. Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S1406110355 Date Retrieved:21025 13 113 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indices in.. t 297 812 Surrounding Area 40 Not c& ® City Limits ■ Not City Household Chonge Household&Population Growth J • F % Households 02020 Population Change:93.2 Population ■Growth (Househoild and Population Change since 2010 Decennian 1,000 2,000 3r00d Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family ® multi-family 10096 Ogg 2 ® Commercial 4D Preliminary Plats(last 5-years) Conditional Use Perrnit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 Single-family Multi-family City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics 2.00 500 Single-family N Residential 1.50 Parcel diversity w 100 65 13 Parcel Count 0.50 0• 51 m 0 Average Acres 0.00 L5 11 d a R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average u 10_00 0 Residential Net Density y sr} C 0 5.55 � 5.00 �� 1.54 19 L93 0.00 Dwelling Units f Acme R-2 R-4 R-E R-15 Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. Figure 2: ACHD Summary Metrics 1. Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)!Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP): • Amity Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from SH-69(Meridian Road) to Locust Grove Road with a design year and construction year yet to be determined. • The intersection of Amity Road and Locust Grove Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be constructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 2-lanes an the north leg,2-lanes on the south, 4- lanes east, and 4-lanes on the west leg with a design year of 2023-2024, a right-of-way year of 2029-2030,and a construction year yet to be determined. • Amity Road is listed in the C I P to be widened to 5-lanes from Locust Grave Road to Eagle Road between 2031 and 2035. Locust Grove Road is listed in the G113 to be widened to 3-lanes from Amity Road to Victory Read between 203E and 2040. • Locust Grove Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Lake Hazel Road to Amity Road between 2036 and 2040. Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH) Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service Locust Grove Road 1,924-feet Minor Arterial 284 Better than"E" Lake Hazel Road 0-feet Minor Arterial 167 Better than"E" 'Acceptable level of service for a two-lane minor arterial is"E'(575 VPH). 'Acceptable level of service for a three-lane minor arterial is"E"(720 VPH). 'Acceptable level of service for a five-lane minor arterial is"E"(1,540 VPH). 2. Average Daily Traffic Count(VVT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHO's most current traffic counts_ The average daily traffic count for Locust Grove Road south of Lake Hazel Road was 3,152 on June 6,2024. • The average daily traffic count for Lake Hazel Road east of SH-69 was 3,747 on June 12, 2018. Updated traffic counts for Lake Hazel Road are not available due to roadway construction in the vicinity of the site. Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 3: Service Impact Summary Service I rnpact Tools Ready I i— Marginal Caution IRO 4� Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview Development Agreement Modification: A modification to the existing Development Agreement (DA) (Inst. #2020-178120)is proposed to replace it with a new agreement for the subject property and to include specific design requirements.A legal description for the boundary of the new DA is included in Section VII.E below. The conceptual development plan included in the existing DA and shown below in Section VII.C, did not include a development plan for this portion of the property—this area was depicted as "future development". The DA requires a modification to the agreement prior to development of the Mixed Use—Community(MU-C) designated areas to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates consistency with the general guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically the MU-C designation. A concept development plan is proposed for the subject property,included below in Section VI1.13,that demonstrates how the subject property is proposed to develop with a mix of single- family residential detached and attached homes and collector streets. Approximately 40.5-acres of the property is designated Medium Density Residential(MDR)with the 10.9-acres at the northeast corner designated MU-C on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM) contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The MDR designation allows residential development at a gross density of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The MU-C designation allows a mix of community-serving uses and dwellings that are integrated within the overall area. Residential uses are expected to comprise between 20% and 50%of the development area with gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units per acre of the residential area. Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places should comprise a minimum of 5%of the development area. The gross density of the residential area within the MU-C designated area is approximately 6 units per acre and the residential area within the MDR designated area is approximately 4.1 units per acre,which is consistent with the desired density in both designations; no community-serving uses are proposed on the subject property. There is approximately 130 acres of MU-C designated land centered at the Locust Grove/Lake Hazel intersection area. The northwest, southwest and southeast corners comprising about 97.5 acres of the area, are either developed or have planned future uses. Of that area, about 46.8 acres will be non-residential uses and includes an existing school—it is unknown how the 2.6 acre site shown as"NAP"on the map below will develop but commercial is likely—if it develops with commercial uses, a total of 49.4 acres of non-residential uses will be provided within these areas, City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis which is about 50%of the MU-C designated land area. This leaves about 33 acres on the northeast corner yet to develop,which is zoned C-C and R-15 and will likely develop with a mix of residential and commercial uses. i Mixed Use community Furu►le FLUM rrfi aIEVELD IEW y f Designated Area k l i f.,IT Aly - _.T. DEVE;I. 'I 1 Existing and FrPot�gE oN 1 ��" proposed i commercial I NAP E The following provisions contained in the DA are applicable to this site: (Staffs comments in italics) • Future preliminary plats shall include collector streets consistent with those shown on the Master Street Map(MSM),as required by Ada County Highway District; Future collector streets are designated on the MSM adjacent to the northern boundary of the proposed preliminary plat along the west side of the rezone area in alignment with S. Apex Ave. to the north and E. Tower St. to the east and should be included in a future subdivision of the property to the north as a provision of the new DA. The conceptual developmentplan submitted with this application, included below in Section VII.C, depicts the collector streets,however, at least half+12'(or as otherwise required by ACHD) of the north/south collector street along the west boundary should be located on the property to the north instead of on the adjacent property to the west and should align with S.Apex Ave. on the north side of E.Lake Hazel Rd.;and the east/west collector street should stub to the Murgoitio property in alignment with E. Tower St. on the east side of S.Locust Grove Rd. . This has been undated by the applicant and included as an exhibit below. • Prior to development of the Mixed Use—Community(MU-C) designated areas shown on the Master Plan as"future development,"the Development Agreement shall be amended to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates consistency with the general City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis guidelines for Mixed Use developments and specifically the MU-C designation(see pgs. 3-13 and 3-15 thru 3-16). As noted above, a mix of single family residential uses, detached and attached units with some alley-loaded units, are proposed in the northern MU-C designated portion of this site with a gross density of 6 units/acre, which is consistent with the desired density of 6 to 15 units per acre. However, the proposed development isn't consistent with other design elements of the MU-C designation that pertain to integration of uses and vehicular interconnectivity between developments due to the orientation of the proposed development in relation to the future non-residential uses to the north and the gated development, which restricts access and hinders integration of uses as desired in MU-C designated areas. The City Council should determine if the proposed development plan should be modified to be more consistent with the general mixed use and MU-C development guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan as required by the DA. • The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E. Lake Hazel Rd. and S. Locust Grove Road, arterial streets, and S. Vertex Way,E. Tower St.,E. Crescendo St., S.Apex Ave. and E. Via Roberto St.,collector streets, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop- outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement; This provision should be carried over to the new DA for homes on lots that face S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Via Roberto St. • All future development, except for single-family detached dwellings,is required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual; This provision should be carried over to the new DA. • The Murgoitio property(Parcel#S 1406110110) located southwest of the E. Lake Hazel/S. Locust Grove Road intersection shall be included in a future subdivision of the surrounding property(Parcel#S 1406110350 or#S 1406110015)in order to establish a legal division of land. Or,if a parcel division was approved by Ada County for the current configuration of the property,proof of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division with a future subdivision application for the surrounding property. The property configuration in this area has changed since the previous development application and the parcel numbers are no longer the same except for Parcel #SI406110110. Staff recommends a new DA provision is added for the northern rezone portion of the property not included in the subject plat(Parcel#S1406110016), to be included in a subsequent plat that includes the Murgoitio parcel(#51406110110) to establish a legal division of land for development purposes. • Multi-use pathways shall be provided with development as required by the Park's Department in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. The proposed development includes multi-use pathway as required by the Park's Dept. in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. Rezone: A rezone of 56.11-acres of land is proposed from the R-8 to the R-15 zoning district for the development of a mix of single-family detached and attached(aka paired) dwellings. Annexation: A narrow strip of land approximately 25 feet in width consisting of 0.86 acres exists along the west side of the Rawson Canal along the west boundary of the property that was inadvertently not included in the original annexation legal description. Because this area is part of City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis the legal parcel,it needs to be annexed. Therefore, annexation is requested with R-15 zoning consistent with the proposed rezone of the rest of the parcel. De-Annexation: There is a narrow strip of land to the south of the Rawson Canal along the west boundary of the site and the adjacent property to the south(S 1406417700 Murgoitio)that was inadvertently included in the original annexation. This area was previously included in a Record of Survey(ROS)to adjust the property line between the two properties and the abutting property to the west(S 1406131700 Bruno)but was never recorded so it's still part of the original parcels. Before a new property boundary adjustment/ROS can be approved and recorded between the properties to rectify the issue,the property needs to be in the County. Therefore,de-annexation of 0.52 acres of land from the City to Ada County is proposed. Per the County,once the City records the ordinance to de-annex the property,the County will initiate a rezone application,with the County as the Applicant,to apply an equivalent County zoning designation(see ACC 8-1-6). This will follow the standard process—Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation followed by a Board of County Commissioners decision—which typically takes 2-3 months. Preliminary Plat: A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 228 building lots for single- family residential dwellings,41 common lots and 16 other lots on 51.5-acres of land in the proposed R-15 district with private streets in the gated portion of the development. The plat is proposed to develop in five(5)phases as shown on the phasing plan below in SectionVII.G. The minimum residential lot size in the gated portion of the development(i.e. "Cadence")is 3,738 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 4,665 s.f.; the gross density is 4.60 units/acre with a net density of 9.34 units/acre. The minimum residential lot size in the non-gated portion of the development,which consists of 16 homes, is 6,600 s.f. with an average lot size of 7,233 s.f.; the gross density is 2.78 units/acre with a net density of 5.65 units/acre. The overall gross density is 4.43 units/acre with a net density of 8.99 units/acre.Where attached dwellings are proposed to span over the shared property line,zero setbacks should be depicted on the plat. To ensure the property included in the preliminary plat is a legal parcel for development, Staff recommends a condition of approval is included that requires the property boundary adjustment referenced above under"De-Annexation"to be approved by the County and the ROS recorded prior to submittal of the first phase final plat application for the development; proof of such should be submitted to the Planning Division. Planned Unit Development(PUD): A PUD is proposed for a(mostly)gated residential development consisting of a mix of single-family attached(aka"Paired Cadence")and detached ("Carriage Lane"and"Conventional")homes, front-loaded and alley-loaded,with a variety of lot sizes, setbacks and home designs at an overall net density of 9.34 units/acre. Except for the 16 homes at the southwest corner of the development,which have public street access,the other 212 homes are accessed via private streets with alleys and common driveways off the private streets. The gated portion of the development will be restricted to residents 55 years of age and older. The clubhouse and sports courts will be tailored to the residents of the community. The PUD includes requests for deviations from certain UDC standards,as follows: • The UDC(11-3F-4A.4b)restricts gated developments to no more than 100 dwelling units; a greater number of units may be approved with a PUD. A total of 212 dwelling units are proposed; and • A reduction in the(local) street setback to living area from 10-feet to 5-feet is proposed for alley-loaded(aka Carriage Lane)units. City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis Home Type Street Setback to Street Interior Rear Living Area Setback to Side Garage Carriage Lane,Alley Loaded Alley-5 ft 5 ft 3 it Alley—N/A,see (Age Restricted)** Local-5 ft(10 ft) street setback Paired Cadence, Front Loaded 10 ft 20 ft 3 tt 12 ft (Age Restricted)` Conventional,Front Loaded 10 ft 20 ft 3 tt 12 ft (NOT Age Restricted NEW *Proposed Setback(Standard Setback in the R-15 Zone) **"Carriage Lane"is Brighton's term for"alley loaded"homes. `"Paired Cadence"is Brighton's term far"duplex"style,age restricted,homes."Street Setback"shall only refer to a setback directly adjacent to right-of-way.When a common lot is adjacent to a lot"Interior Side"setback shall be used to determine the setback. I I I 1' I .i N� o I ti TT__ __ I Table 4:Pro*ect Overview Description Details History ROS#3952(1997—Parcel#S1406110355 was created by this ROS for a one-time division of land in Ada County—property status report#97054- ZCA);H-2015-0019(South Meridian AZ—Brighton Investments,LLC— DA Inst.#2016-007072);H-2020-0066(DA Inst.#2020-178120 Apex— this DA replaced the previous DA) Phasing Plan 5 phases Residential Units 228 single-family home Open Space 9.75-acres(or 18.94%) Amenities Bocce ball and pickleball courts,clubhouse Physical Features The Rawson Canal runs along the west boundary of site and the Watkins Drain bisects the site north/south Acreage 56.11-acres(RZ); 51.5-acres(PP) Lots 228 single-family residential building lots,41 common lots& 16 other lots City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis Description Details Density 2.78 units/acre(gross);5.65-acres(net) B. History This property was originally annexed with a Development Agreement(DA) (Inst. #2016-007072) as part of the larger South Meridian annexation in 2015 and assigned a"placeholder"zoning district of R-4. Any future development required an amendment to the DA to approve a proposed development plan. The DA was amended in 2020(Inst. #2020-178120—Apex H-2020-0066)and the property was rezoned to R-8 but a development plan was not submitted at that time for this portion of the overall property. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): None 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): Single-family detached and attached dwellings are listed as principal permitted uses in the R- 15 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-2. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): See UDC Table 11-2A-7. As noted above, a reduction in the street setback to living area from 10-feet to 5-feet is proposed with the PUD from the local(private) street for single- family detached alley-loaded(aka Carriage Lane)units. Zero(0) setbacks should be depicted on the final plat on lot lines where attached units are proposed. 4. Planned Unit Developments (UDC 11-7): As set forth in UDC 11-7-1,the purpose of the PUD requirements is to provide an opportunity for exemplary site development that meets the following objectives: 1. Preserves natural, scenic and historic features of major importance; 2. Allows for innovative design that creates visually pleasing and cohesive patterns of development(including,but not limited to,residential development at densities greater than eight(8)units per acre where design guidelines are in place for development and where garage doors are generally not fronting the street); and 3. Creates functionally integrated development that allows for a more efficient and cost- effective provision of public services. Staff is unaware of any natural, scenic or historic features of major importance that may exist on this site. The proposed development generally allows for innovative design that creates visually pleasing and cohesive patterns of development—garage doors don't front the street on interior lots where alley-loaded(Carriage Lane)units are proposed—the remainder of the development does have garage doors fronting the street. Pathway connectivity is proposed within the development and to adjacent properties;however,vehicular connectivity is not proposed with the future mixed-use area to the north or the conventional homes proposed at the southwest corner of the development as the 55+portion of the development(i.e. Carriage Lane and Paired Cadence)is proposed to be gated off.Because the development is proposed to be gated,the rear of structures are oriented toward the MU-C area, and there is no vehicular interconnectivity,it is not functionally integrated with the MU-C designated area to the north as desired. City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis As set forth in UDC 11-7-4,the Council may approve PUD's upon recommendation by the Commission, in accord with the standards for general use,private open space,residential use and infill planned developments, as follows: General use standards: • Deviations from underlying district requirements: Deviations from the development standards and/or area requirements of the district in accord with UDC 11-2, "district regulations",may be approved. The following deviations are proposed: o A reduction in the street setback to living area from 10-feet to 5-feet for alley-loaded(Carriage Lane)units from the local(private) street is requested. o Allowance for 212 dwelling units in a gated development,which is otherwise restricted to 100 dwelling units per UDC 11-3F-4A.4b but a greater number may be approved with a PUD; and • Allowed uses: Applicant may request that specific conditional or accessory use(s) allowed in the district be allowed as principal permitted use(s). No such uses are requested as principal permitted uses. • Interconnected uses: The uses within the planned unit development are required to be interconnected through a system of roadways and/or pathways as appropriate. The proposed residential uses within the gated portion of the development are interconnected through a system of private streets and pathways. Pathways are proposed for interconnectivity to the conventional homes outside the gated development at the southwest corner of the site and to the future development area to the north; however,vehicular interconnectivity isn't proposed with those areas. • Building clusters: Buildings shall be clustered to preserve scenic or environmentally sensitive areas in the natural state, or to consolidate small open spaces into larger,more usable areas for common use and enjoyment. A large central common open space area is provided with amenities and pathways throughout the development connecting to segments of the City's multi-use pathway system. Several smaller common areas are also proposed. Private open space: In addition to the common open space and site amenity requirements as set forth in chapter 3, "regulations applying to all districts",of this title,a minimum of 80 square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each residential unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks, and enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other accessways do not count toward this requirement. Compliance with this standard is required. Residential use standards: • Multi-family:No multi-family uses are proposed. • Housing types: A variety of housing types shall be included within a single planned development, including attached units (townhouses, duplexes), detached units (patio homes), single-family and multi-family units,regardless of the district classification of the site,provided that the overall density limit of the district is maintained. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis A mix of housing types are proposed consisting of single-family detached and attached units with alley and front-loaded and single-story and 2-story options. • Density bonus:Not applicable Infill planned developments: Not applicable In approving the PUD,the Council may prescribe appropriate conditions,additional conditions,bonds,and safeguards in conformity with the UDC that: 1. Minimize adverse impact of the use on other property. 2. Control the sequence and timing of the use. 3. Control the duration of the use. 4. Assure that the use and the property in which the use is located is maintained properly. 5. Designate the exact location and nature of the use and the property development. 6. Require the provision for on-site or off-site public facilities or services. 7. Require more restrictive standards than those generally required in this title. 8. Require mitigation of adverse impacts of the proposed development upon service delivery by any political subdivision, including school districts,which provides services within the city. The Commission and Council should determine if the proposed development plan meets the objectives of the PUD noted above or if changes should be required to the plan to more closely align with the objectives and standards as well as with the development guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use and MU-C development areas.A possible re-design for the northeast corner of the development area (i.e. MU-C designated area)might include public streets with a public access off S. Locust Grove Rd and to the north for future interconnectivity with an internal local street connection to the gated portion of the development, and reorientation of the residential lots to be more integrated with the future commercial uses in the MU-C area to the north. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): The proposed single-family attached dwellings are required to comply with the residential design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Single-family detached dwellings are exempt from these standards. 2. Qualified Open Space&Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3G): 51.5 Based on 51.5-acres of land in the preliminary plat, a minimum of 15% (or 7.73-acres) qualified open space is required to be provided with development that meets the quality standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3A.2 and the standards for qualified open space listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. The Applicant proposes a total of 9.75-acres(or 18.94%)qualified open space consisting of several open grassy areas exceeding 5,000 square feet in area; linear open space; 50% of the street buffer along S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street; 100% of the street buffer along E. Via Roberto St.,a collector street; a protective buffer dedicated for active access along the Rawson Canal; and parkways along local residential streets as shown on the open space exhibit in Section VII.I. When counting buffers along collector and arterial streets,the buffers are required to comply with the enhanced buffer requirements in UDC 11-3G-3B.3.Parkways along local City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis residential streets are required to meet the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.4 when counted toward open space; calculations should be included on the landscape plan for the required number of trees within parkways.Protective buffers along open waterways are required to be a minimum of 10-feet between the pathway and the waterway; in order to count this area as qualified open space,the area between the pathway and waterway needs to be widened to 10-feet.If any stormwater detention facilities are proposed,they're required to comply with the standards in UDC 11-3G-3B.S when counted toward open space. A minimum of 10 amenity points are required to be provided based on the area of the development(i.e. 51.5-acres). Site amenities totaling 22 points(pts.)are proposed from the Qualify of Life and Recreation Activity categories as shown on the exhibit in Section VII.J as follows: • Quality of Life: Clubhouse greater than 5,000 square feet in size(6 pts.) • Recreation Activity Area: o Sports courts,paved—(2)pickleball courts(4 pts. each); sports courts,unpaved— (2)bocce ball courts(2 pts. each); 1,5600 Per UDC 11-3G-4D.5,the sports courts are required to include benches for seating. o Multi-use pathways: A 1,560+/- foot long section of the multi-use pathway is proposed along the Rawson Canal(2 pts.)Note:Multi-use pathways are required to be a minimum of 10 feet in width per UDC 11-3A-8—the pathway along the Rawson Canal should be widened from 8 to 10 feet;the micro path connections to the multi-use pathway don't qualify. o Pedestrian circulation system aligned with a linear open space: A total of �5942,429+/-linear feet of pathways are proposed within the development(2 pts.) The proposed common open space and site amenities meet and exceed UDC standards for such. Landscaping is required to be provided in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-5B and maintained in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-5C. The proposed development is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy#2.02.00,which states,Plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Locust Grove Rd.. an arterial street, and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along E. Via Roberto St., a collector street, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C and the enhanced buffer requirements required for qualified open space listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.3. Street buffers are proposed in excess of the minimum width standards that include 3-foot tall berms. Landscaping is required within parkways in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3A- 17E, 11-3B-7C and 11-3G-3B.4. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application(s) should comply with the aforementioned standards. City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis Tree preservation There are a few existing trees on the property along the Rawson Canal;include mitigation calculations on the landscape plan in accord with the standards in UDC 11-313-1OC.5, as applicable. Storm integration Stormwater integration is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 11 C. A Geotechnical Investigation report was submitted with this application and is included in the project file. Pathway landscaping Landscaping is required within minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strips along each side of all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C.A minimum of one (1)tree is required per 100 linear feet of pathway with shrubs, lawn or other vetitive groundcover along pathways; shrubs should be included in the planter strips/common areas along with vegetative groundcover. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for each dwelling based on the number of bedrooms per unit in accord with the standards for single-family detached and attached dwellings in UDC Table 11-3C-6. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Several conceptual building elevations were submitted for single-story and 2-story detached and attached(aka paired) single-family residential homes,included in Section VIIX below. A variety of materials are proposed including vertical and horizontal lap siding,board and batten siding, fenestration with stone/brick veneer accents in a variety of colors and design elements/features with varying roof profiles and wall modulation that demonstrate the high quality of development proposed. Because the rear and/or sides of homes facing S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Via Roberto St. will be highly visible,those elevations should incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays, banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets; single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. All single-family attached structures are subject to the residential design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM). Staff is of the opinion the proposed conceptual building elevations are in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02L: "Support beautiful and high-quality development that reinforces neighborhood character and sustainability. 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing should comply with the standards listed in UDC I I-3A-7A. The landscape plan depicts a mix of 6-foot tall cedar fence and 5-foot tall clear vision metal fence. The developer is responsible for constructing fences abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas; fencing should be depicted on the landscape plan accordingly. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 7. Parkways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-17): Parkways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17E. Eight- foot-wide parkways are proposed as required. E. Transportation Analysis A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was not required by ACHD for this development. Per the ACHD report,this development is estimated to generate 1,065 vehicle trips per day,79 vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour. The proposed development meets ACHD policies and level of service planning thresholds. Public transit is not available to this site. The following are ACHD's Planned Improvements for the area: Capital Improvements Plan(GIP)l Intograted Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP); Amity Road is scheduled in the IFYP to be widened to planes from SH-69(Meridian Road) to Locust Grove Road with a design year and construction year yet to be determined_ The intersection of Amity Road and Locust Grove Road is scheduled in the IFYP to be constructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 2-lanes on the north leg, 2-lanes on the south,4- lanes east, and 4-lanes on the west leg with a design year of 2023-2024, a right-of-way year of 2029-2030,and a construction year yet to be determined_ • Amity Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from Locust Grove Read to Eagle Road between 2031 and 2035. + Locust Grove Road is listed in the CIP to be widened t0 3-lanes from Amity Road to Victory Road between 2036 and 2040. • Locust Grave Road is listed in the GIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Lake Hazel Road to Amity Road between 2036 and 2040. ACHD is requiring Via Roberto St. to be redesigned to include the use of passive design elements (traffic calming). 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): One private street access is proposed via S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street; and one private street and one public street access is proposed via E.Via Roberto St.,a collector street.A gated stub street is proposed to the north,which will connect to a fixture collector street.A public stub street is proposed to the west in the un-gated portion of the development for future extension and interconnectivity. Future collector streets are depicted on ACHD's Master Street Map on the property to the north of the proposed subdivision. The concept plan included in the Applicant's narrative and phasing plan doesn't accurately depict the location of the extension of S.Apex Ave. from E. Lake Hazel Rd. on the property to the north and doesn't depict the extension of the collector to the east in alignment with E. Tower St. and therefore, isn't approved. Staff recommends as a provision of the development agreement that these collector streets, or a portion thereof as applicable,are included in a future subdivision of the property to the north. Said collector streets should align with S.Apex Ave.on the north side of E.Lake Hazel Rd. and E. Tower St.on the east side of S.Locust Grove Rd. The eoneept plan should 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): A pedestrian connectivity plan is included below in Section VII.O showing proposed pathways within the development. A minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use pathway is required along the Rawson Canal and E. Via Roberto Ln. in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. The proposed 8-foot-wide pathway along the canal should be widened to 10-feet and Staff recommends it be constructed in City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis its entirety with the second phase of development—the phasing plan should be revised accordingly prior to the City Council hearing. Staff recommends the pathway is extended to the north boundary through the common area for pedestrian interconnectivity with the future mixed-use development.The pathway should be designed and constructed consistent with the guidelines contained in Chapter 3 of the Pathways Master Plan. A revised pedestrian eonneetivity plan should be submitted pr-iO-F to the City Counefl hearing that ineor-por-ates these ehanges. A 14-foot-wide public use easement is required for the multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal on Lots 88 and 276,Block 1 outside of the irrigation easement unless permission is specifically obtained from the governing irrigation district; include the recorded instrument number of the easement on the plat.If the pathway along E.Via Roberto St.isn't located entirely within the right-of-way, a public use easement will also be required for that pathway. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): Internal pathways are proposed through common open space areas as depicted on the landscape plan. The pathways should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. 4. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Sidewalks are required with development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A- 17. Detached 5-foot-wide sidewalks are proposed along all internal private and public streets. A 10-foot-wide detached sidewalk is proposed along E.Via Roberto St.; a 10-foot-wide detached sidewalk should also be provided along S.Locust Grove Rd. as requested by the Parks' Dept.—the landscape plan and pedestrian connectivity plan should be revised accordingly.Additionally,for pedestrian safety and safe access to schools, Staff recommends the sidewalks along Locust Grove and Via Roberts are constructed in their entirety with the first phase of development; the phasing plan should be revised accordingly prior to the City Council hearing. 5. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): Private streets serving single-family developments may be permitted at the discretion of the decision-making body in cases where the project qualifies as a planned unit development and where compliance with public safety and access requirements can be demonstrated. Private streets are required to comply with the standards in UDC 11-3F-4. Private streets are proposed for access to the single-family dwellings(i.e. Carriage Lane and Paired Cadence)in the gated portion of the development. The UDC (11-3F-4B.4b)restricts gated developments to no more than 100 dwelling units; a greater number of units may be approved with a PUD. As allowed with a PUD,the Applicant requests a total of 212 dwelling units are allowed within the gated portion of the development. The proposed gates shall not prohibit pedestrian and bicycle access to and through the development. Access to the gates are required to be provided for emergency vehicles as determined and approved by the Fire Dept. and Public Works Dept. To allow sufficient vehicle stacking and turn-around distance,the gate shall be located a minimum of fifty(50) feet back from the ultimate edge of right-of-way to the connecting public street and include a dedicated paved vehicle turnaround area. There is 190-feet between the entrance and the gate,which will allow approximately 10 cars to stack,based on 19' for each car, if needed without impacting Locust Grove Rd. The private streets should be constructed on a single platted lot that provides access to all properties served by such private streets. Private streets are required to connect to a local or collector street; connection to an arterial street is prohibited unless otherwise allowed by the City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis decision-making body as part of a concurrent hearing level application and approved by the transportation authority. Two(2)of the proposed private street connections are to collector streets(E.Via Roberto St. &future street to the north) and one(1) is to an arterial street(i.e. S. Locust Grove Rd.). ACHD is in support of the connection to Locust Grove if approved by the City. Approval from City Council is needed for the private street connection(E. Bingley Ln.)to an arterial street(S.Locust Grove Rd.). All private streets will have parking on one(1) side of the street. The Fire Marshall has determined the proposed private streets have sufficient maneuvering area for emergency vehicles. UDC 11-3F-4B.7 states, "The overall street network within the surrounding area shall allow for properties to connect at regular intervals in order to promote connected neighborhoods and traffic flow within the mile section."The proposed private streets prohibit neighborhood connectivity,especially within the mixed use designated area. Private streets are required to be constructed in accord with the roadway and storm drainage standards of the transportation authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted by a certified engineer.Twenty-six(26+)foot wide private streets are proposed,which comply with the street width standard. All drive aisles are required to be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed; the curb is also required to be painted red,unless parking is allowed on one or both sides of the street per UDC 11-3F-4C.2. Upon review and approval by the Director subject to any applicable conditions of approval and the regulations of Chapter 5,the applicant shall have two(2)years to complete the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3B.Proof of such shall be submitted to the Planning division within that time period. 6. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): Common driveways Common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. Six(6) common driveways are proposed off private streets within the development. The UDC(11-3F-4B.6) doesn't allow common driveways off a private street unless the street section allows for parking on at least one side of the street or the development has designated adequate guest parking dispersed throughout, as determined by the Director. All street sections allow parking on one side of the street. A total of 34 parking spaces are provided around the central common area where the clubhouse is located that could be used for guest parking,which the Director has determined is adequate. UDC 11-6C-3D.1 states that in no case shall more than three(3)dwelling units be located on one(1)side of the common driveway. There are four(4)lots proposed on one side of the driveway on Lots 260-263.One of these lots should be removed to comply with the standard. Common driveway exhibits are included below in Section VII.H. Staff r-eeommends the following revisions to the exhibits prior-to the City f'o,,neil hearing: NOTE: Staff added these as conditions in section IV.below. • A 20-foot wide area shall be depicted on the lots at the end of the common driveways across the front of the lots for a turnaround area with a 20-foot setback from that area to the face of garage and 10-foot setback to living area; City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis • The exhibit showing Lot 24,Block 1 shall depict a minimum 12-foot rear setback across the entire width of the lot; and • The note stating an adjaeent lot ,ensible for-installing and maintaining landseape and iFr-igation the effiffl-m-On areas adjaeent to the eommon driveway shall be removed the develop i - 'ble fo i� • inelude the small triangle areas between the eommon driveways and adjaeent building lots in the adjaeent building lots; revise the plat aeeor-dingly.Provide a 28 foot inside and 48 foot outside turning Fadius in. fkEE9rzc with-UDC r 6C- A note should be included on the final plat that grants a perpetual ingress/egress easement over lots where common driveways are proposed for access to the lots served by the common driveways.The note should include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.8. Alleys Alleys are required to comply with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. The proposed 20- foot-wide alley street sections depicted on the plat comply with these standards. A turning radius exhibit was submitted that demonstrates the entrance to the alleys from the private streets provide a minimum 28-foot inside and 48-foot outside turning radius as required by the Fire Dept.Wayfinding address signage should be provided at the private street for homes accessed via alleys that don't have frontage on a named street(i.e.Lots 96,97,99-103,Block 1 and Lots 224-231,Block 1). Block face Block faces are limited to 750 feet in length in residential districts; if a pedestrian connection is provided,the block face can extend up to 1,000 feet in length. Council may approve a block face up to 1,200 feet in length where block design is constrained by certain site conditions that include a large waterway and/or a large irrigation facility. In no case shall a block face exceed 1,200 feet unless waived by City Council.Where appropriate and as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3F.3,traffic calming may be required for blocks in excess of 1,000 feet. Approximately 1,070 feet of the 1,500 foot face of Block 1 abuts the Rawson Canal, the remainder abuts another block south of the canal. City Council approval of the block face is required; otherwise,the block face should be revised to comply with the standard.The other block faces within the development comply with the block face standards. If Council approves the proposed block face, Staff recommends Council require passive design elements(not speed humps,valley gutters, stop signs or cross drains)to slow traffic for safety purposes. F. Services Analysis See Service Accessibility Report in Section VII.B below. 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): All waterways, except natural waterways,are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 6. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis The Rawson Canal lies along the west boundary of the site within an 80-foot wide U.S. Bureau of Reclamation easement,40-feet each side of centerline,per the Boise Project Board of Control's letter and as depicted on the plat. The canal is proposed to remain open as linear open space with a segment of the multi-use pathway system alongside. The Boise Project Board of Control is contracted to operate and maintain this canal and prohibits encroachments of any kind within the easement, including landscaping,pathways,fencing,etc.,only gravel is allowed. The Watkins Drain bisects this site north/south and is being relocated along the Rawson Canal and will either be piped or remain open per the preliminary engineering plans; the easement should be depicted on the plat. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided in each development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in accord with the adopted standards, specifications and ordinances; design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City per UDC 11-3A-18. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): All utilities for the proposed development are required to be installed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-21. Water and sewer service is available at the site. The project is consistent with the Water and Wastewater Master Plan/Facility Plan. Each phase of development will need to be modeled to verify minimum fire flow pressure is maintained. See Public Works comments/conditions for more information. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS& CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. Annexation/Rezone: A new Development Agreement(DA) shall be required as a provision of the MDA and RZ applications. The previous DA [i.e. Apex-Inst. #2020-178120)] shall no longer be in effect for the subject property. Prior to approval of the de-annexation, annexation and rezone ordinances, a new DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of ordinance adoption,and the developer.A final plat application shall not be submitted until the de- annexation, annexation and rezone applications are finalized. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact,Conclusions of Law and Decision&Order for these requests. The new DA shall incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat,phasing plan, landscape plan, open space exhibit, site amenity exhibit and conceptual building elevations included below in Section VII,the conditions contained herein and the standards in the Unified Development Code(UDC). b. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face S. Locust Grove Road,an arterial street, and E. Via Roberto St., a collector street, shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step- backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. c. The northern portion of the subject property to be rezoned(Parcel#S1406110016) shall be incorporated into a subsequent plat that includes the adjacent Murgoitio parcel(Parcel #S 1406110110) located directly to the east,prior to submittal of any building permit application,to establish a legal division of land for development purposes. d. Future collector streets are depicted on ACHD's Master Street Map on the property to the north of the proposed subdivision that's included in the rezone and shall be included in a future subdivision. Said collector streets shall align with S. Apex Ave. on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and E. Tower St. on the east side of S. Locust Grove Rd. e. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the development. £ Administrative design review shall be required for all single-family attached structures in accord with the residential design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. Single-family detached structures are exempt from these standards. 2. Preliminary Plat: a. The final plat shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 14-foot wide public use easement for the multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal on Lots 88 and 276,Block 1 outside of the irrigation easement unless permission is specifically obtained from the governing irrigation district; include the recorded instrument number of the easement on the plat. ii. If the multi-use pathway/sidewalk along E. Via Roberto St. and S. Locust Grove Rd. isn't located entirely within the right-of-way,public use easement(s) shall be submitted to the City and depicted on the plat. iii. Revise the face of Block 1 to comply with the block face standards listed in UDC 1I- 6C-3F for the residential district if City Council does not approve a waiver to the standards as requested. iv. Include a note that grants a perpetual ingress/egress easement over common driveway lots for access to the lots served by the common driveways. The note shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.8. v-. include the small t.-;angle areas depieted o the 1.,*,1s,ape..la .,* driveway exhibits between the eemman driveways a*d adjaeepA building lots in th-e adj aeepA biiildiag lots. Easiffe the driveways provide a 2 8 feet inside a-ad 4 8 feet vi. Remove one(1)of the building lots within the area of Lots 260-263,Block 1 to comply with UDC 11-6C-3D.1,which allows a maximum of three(3) dwelling units to be located one(1) side of the common driveway. vii. Widen the protective buffer between the multi-use pathway and the Rawson Canal/Watkins Drain to a minimum of 10-feet in order for this area(i.e. Lots 88 and 276,Block 1 to be counted toward qualified open space in accord with UDC 11-3G- 313.1c. viii.Depict a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal, including along the cul-de-sac to the west boundary of the site alongside E.Adler City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions Hof St.,in Lots 88 and 276,Block 1 in accord with UDC 11-3A-8G and the Pathways Master Plan. ix. Depict an 80-foot-wide U.S. Bureau of Reclamation easement(40-feet each side of centerline) for the Rawson Canal per the Boise Project Board of Control's letter. x. Depict the easement for the Watkins Drain. xi. Depict zero(0) setbacks on lot lines where attached units are proposed to span over the shared property line. xii. Depict private streets on a single platted lot that provides access to all properties served by such private streets. b. The landscape plan shall include the following revisions: i. Depict enhanced landscaping within the street buffers along S. Locust Grove Rd.,an arterial street, and E. Via Roberto St., a collector street, in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. and 11-3G-3B.3. ii. Include calculations for the required number of trees within the parkways along internal private streets that demonstrate compliance with the standards in UDC 11- 3A-17E, 11-3B-7C and UDC 11-3G-3B.4. iii. Depict benches for seating by the sports courts (i.e. bocce ball and pickleball)in accord with UDC 11-3G-4D.5. iv. Depict a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal, including along the cul-de-sac to the west boundary of the site alongside E. Adler Hof St.,in Lots 88 and 276,Block 1 in accord with UDC 11-3A-8G and the Pathways Master Plan. v. Depict a 10-foot-wide detached sidewalk/pathway within the street buffer along S. Locust Grove Rd. vi. Include the small triangle areas depicted on the landscape plan and common driveway exhibits between the common driveways and adjacent building lots in the adjacent building lots. vii. Remove one(1)of the building lots within the area of Lots 260-263,Block 1 to comply with UDC 11-6C-3D.1,which allows a maximum of three(3) dwelling units to be located one(1) side of the common driveway. viii.Widen the protective buffer between the multi-use pathway and the Rawson Canal/Watkins Drain to a minimum of 10-feet in order for this area(i.e. Lots 88 and 276,Block 1)to be counted toward qualified open space in accord with UDC 11-3G- 313.1c. ix. Include tree mitigation calculations on the landscape plan in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5, as applicable. x. Depict a mix of trees, shrubs and vegetative groundcover along all pathways in accord with the standards in UDC 11-313-12C. xi. Depict fencing abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A.7. xii. Extend the 10-foot-wide multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal through the common area to the north boundary for future connection to the sidewalk/pathway along the collector street to the north for pedestrian interconnectivity with the future mixed-use development. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions c. Off-street parking is required to be provided for all single-family residential units in accord with the standards for such listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6. d. All waterways,except natural waterways,intersecting,crossing or lying within the area being development are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. If left open, fencing may be required in accord with the standards listed in UDC I I-3A-6C. e. Submit a public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal on Lots 88 and 276, Block 1 and along E.Via Roberto St. if the pathway isn't located entirely within the right-of-way. The easement along the canal shall be located outside of the irrigation easement unless permission is specifically obtained from the governing irrigation district. f the pathway f. Wayfinding address signage shall be provided at the private street for homes accessed via alleys that don't have frontage on a named street(i.e.Lots 96, 97, 99-103 and 224-231, Block 1). g. The common driveways shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D and the revised common driveway exhibits in Section VII.H. • A 20-foot wide area shall be depicted on the lots at the end of the common driveways across the front of the lots for a turnaround area with a 20-foot setback from that area to the face of garage and 10-foot setback to living area. • The exhibit showing Lot 24,Block I shall depict a minimum 12-foot rear setback across the entire width of the lot. h. Wayfinding address signage shall be provided at the private street for homes accessed via common driveways that don't have frontage on a named street. i. Access to the gated entries shall be provided for emergency vehicles as determined and approved by the Fire Dept. and Public Works Dept. in accord with UDC 11-3F-4A.4d. j. Private streets shall be constructed in accord with the roadway and storm drainage standards of the transportation authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted by a certified engineer per UDC 11-3F-4C.2a. k. All private street drive aisles shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed. In addition,the curb shall be painted red unless parking is allowed on one or both sides of the street,per UDC 11-3F-4C.2d. 1. All private streets shall be designed to allow parking on at least one (1) side of the street to accommodate common driveways off a private street as set forth in UDC 11-3F-4B.6. in. The proposed gates within the gated portion of the development shall not prohibit pedestrian and bicycle access to and through the development as set forth in UDC 11-3F- 4B.4c. n. To allow sufficient vehicle stacking and turn-around distance,the gates shall be located a minimum of 50 feet back from the ultimate edge of right-of-way to the connecting public street and include a dedicated paved vehicle turnaround area as set forth in UDC 11-317- 4B.4e. o. Prior to submittal of the first final plat application,the property boundary adjustment between Parcel#S 1406131700, S 1406427800, S 1406417700 and S 1406110355 shall be finalized. The Applicant shall submit proof of such in the form of an approval letter from Ada County and a recorded Record of Survey. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions p. The 10-foot-wide detached sidewalks along S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Via Roberto St. shall be constructed in their entirety with the first phase of development. q. The 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal shall be constructed in its entirety with the second phase of development. r. The Applicant/Owner shall have two(2)years to complete the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F- 3B for approval of the private streets;proof of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division. s. Compliance with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district is required except for any deviations approved with the PUD as noted below in Section 3. t. Approval of the preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the first phase final plat within two(2)years of City Council's approval of the preliminary plat; or a time extension may be requested as set forth in UDC I 1-613-7. 3. Planned Unit Development(PUD): a. The following deviations from UDC standards are allowed though the PUD: i. The gated portion of the residential development is allowed to have up to 212 dwelling units. ii. The minimum street setback to living area for alley-loaded(i.e. Carriage Lane) dwelling units from a local(private) street is reduced from 10 feet to 5 feet. b. A minimum of 80 square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each residential unit as set forth in UDC I 1-7-413. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios, decks, and enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other accessways do not count toward this requirement. c. The conditional use permit for the planned unit development is valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the Applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground as set forth in UDC 11-513-6. A time extension may be requested as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6F. Other Agency comments may be accessed in the project file in the public record. Copy and paste the following link into your browser: https:llweblink.meridiancil y�oL-glWebLinkl'browse.aspx?id=376223&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development plan complies with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan pertaining to density, land use,pedestrian connectivity and compatibility with adjacent uses. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed amendment to the R-15 district is consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that a range of housing opportunities are proposed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be materially detrimental to the public health and safety but recommends the Commission and Council rely on public testimony to determine this finding. 3. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services; however, because student enrollment at area schools will increase with this development, services by the school district may be impacted by the proposed map amendment. 4. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the proposed request is for a rezone, not annexation. B. Annexation and Zoning(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development plan complies with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed amendment to the R-15 district is consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that a range of housing opportunities are proposed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be materially detrimental to the public health and safety but recommends the Commission and Council rely on public testimony to determine this finding. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services; however, because student enrollment at area schools will increase with this development, services by the school district may be impacted by the proposed map amendment. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City as it cleans up the zoning boundary to be consistent with the parcel boundary. C. De-Annexation(UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed de-annexation of land to be included in a property boundary adjustment with the adjacent County land complies with applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds this finding is not applicable as the proposed map amendment will result in a County zoning designation once the property is de-annexed; therefore, the regulations of the district will no longer apply. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City as the property will be in the County once it's de-annexed. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the proposed request is for de-annexation. D. Preliminary Plat(UDC-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Commission finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the applicable standards in the UDC. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services are available to the site and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds there are no scheduled public improvements that affect development of this site. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development should not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare but recommends the Commission and Council rely on public testimony to determine this finding. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. E. Planned Unit Development(UDC 11-7-5) Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a planned development request,the Council shall make the following findings: 1. The planned unit development demonstrates exceptional high quality in site design through the provision of cohesive, continuous,visually related and functionally linked patterns of development, street and pathway layout,and building design. The Commission finds the proposed planned unit development demonstrates a high quality of site design through the provision of cohesive, continuous, visually related and functionally linked patterns of development, street and pathway layout and building design. 2. The planned unit development preserves the significant natural, scenic and/or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic and/or historic features that need to be preserved with development. 3. The arrangement of uses and/or structures in the development does not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. The Commission finds the arrangement of uses and/or structures in the development does not cause damage, hazard or nuisance to persons or property in the vicinity. 4. The internal street,bike and pedestrian circulation system is designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles,bicyclists and pedestrians without having a disruptive influence upon the activities and functions contained within the development,nor place an undue burden upon existing transportation and other public services in the surrounding area. The Commission finds the internal street and pedestrian circulation system, which includes 10'wide multi-use pathways, is designed for the efficient and safe flow of vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians without having a disruptive influence upon the activities and functions within the development, nor place an undue burden upon existing transportation and other public services in the surrounding area. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. Community facilities, such as a park,recreational, and dedicated open space areas are functionally related and accessible to all dwelling units via pedestrian and/or bicycle pathways. The Commission finds the central common open space area and amenities as well as other open space areas within the development are accessible to all residents via pedestrian and/or bicycle pathways. 6. The proposal complies with the density and use standards requirements in accord with chapter 2, "District Regulations", of this title. The Commission finds the proposed residential development complies with the density and use standard requirements in UDC 11-7-4. 7. The amenities provided are appropriate in number and scale to the proposed development. The Commission finds the proposed amenity plan for the development is appropriate in number and scale to the proposed development and far exceeds the minimum standards. 8. The planned unit development is in conformance with the comprehensive plan. The Commission finds the proposed planned unit development is in conformance with the comprehensive Plan with the provisions included in Section IV above. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed applications with the conditions included above in Section IV,per the Findings in Section V if City Council finds the proposed development plan in conformance with the PUD standards and the development guidelines in the Comprhensive Plan for mixed use areas and specifically,the MU-C designation. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard these items on November 6 and 20,2025. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject application requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Amanda McNutt,Brighton Corporation(Applicant); Jon Wardle, Bri hg ton Corporation and Mike Wardle,Brighton Corporation b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Julie Edwards d. Written testimony: Joann Tima; Holly Myers; Shawn Freeman; Amanda McNutt, Brighton Corporation(response to the staff report) e. Staff presentinggpplication: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Against the proposed rezone from R-8 to R-15 due to the increase in housingd ensity and associated impacts. b. In favor of 55 and older community as it shouldn't negatively impact schools; against the proposed rezone due to the increase in density that it will allow,which will provide little transition to the low-density R-4 zoned property to the south. Belief that the developer should be held to UDC standards without deviations, including. the for over double the amount of homes as typically allowed within a,gated community, reduced building setbacks and extended block face. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Not in support of the proposed development due to the opinion that it doesn't align with what the purpose of a mixed-use development is and the kind of live/work/play City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action approach that is prevalent throughout the code and the City's planning documents. The reasons are the lack of integration of uses due to the residential development being gated off with the rear of homes facing the future commercial area, lack of connectivity between uses and lack of public realm elements that are central to the mixed-use designation. tion. b. Generally in favor of the proposed 55 and older development but not in favor of the common driveways. C. Discussion pertaining to the Applicant's requested changes to the Staff recommendation. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. The Commission directed the Applicant to continue to work with the City on the timing of the phasing of the amenities;that there is good faith to be able to work with the County and the City to get all permitting correct; and to provide an updated plat i.e. concept plan, for City Council in regard to the stub street for the Mur og itio property to be incorporated at a later date if at all. (No specific changes to the recommended conditions.) 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. The Applicant requests the following approvals from City Council: • Approval of a private street(i.e. E. Bin leg y Ln.)connection to an arterial street(i.e. S. Locust Grove Rd.).UDC 11-3F-4B.2 prohibits private street connections to an arterial street,unless otherwise allowed by the decision-making body as part of a concurrent hearinglpplication and approved by the transportation authority. • Approval to exceed the maximum block face standard in UDC 11-6C-3F of 1,000 feet with a pedestrian connection for Block 1, a portion of which lies along the Rawson Canal. b. The City Council should determine if the proposed development plan should be modified to be more consistent with the general mixed use and MU-C development guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan as required by the DA. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI.Action ' � 1 - • - • . ��11 '�eun ,r wn lunnuu I ir11q rmT 1°;jw- LAKEHAZEl. W co .J -� IIIIII lrrl�•rlrrlllrr ' 1111111 IIIIIIFIFIII ■ �I ,1 urn • i L-AKE HAZEL Iry� 111111 INZ ■ 99 2 �W r long�� 1 S+• 9 ��Il�i � rr I ■ ■ RUN COLUMBIA 1 �1 3. Future Land Use Legend Project Location PM "I Area of Impact Analysis T MedjHigh MU-C Density fNU-RG ResidentI I Civic Medium Density Residential Low-Density Residential 4. Planned Development Map Legend Project Location Area of Impact T City Limits — i �de Liu�_ �® Planned Parcels ® ��F - OAnalysis MPH a 7 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits B. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S1406110355 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 22 12nd Percentile Description Location In City Limits GREEN Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 540 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloociplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Semites Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Not enough data to report average response time RED Pathways W thin 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets YELLOW plan) > existing (# of lanes) & road IS in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity Not within 1 mile walking 7RED School DrivaElity Not within 2 miles driving of existing or future sc--cc RED Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Commun ParkWalkability Parkwithin 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park di*`3' GREEN 1/4 mile walking Report generated on 11-03-2025 by MERIDIAWallen City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Existing Conceptual Development Plan Included in Development Agreement F�RYRa i S - C z klfltMrk OENEL9Ffkrld I leap �. Q _ ---------- AREA EXCLUDED BY ti t AUGUST 11,2020 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL; + SUBJECT TO FUTURE APPLCATIONS nm a oFaYi�EM t r�'T #CF9Cl I � _ FU R: i I L. I I. I - �_' k• Q ELiV[EHA2fn _____fir •- I' I- T ' I N4 - �- 5 I 1 i _I 7 f�IVlt! i. 1J C�:l'[�:Yltin� i I ' 1 y C� 8 C::•IdCEMAL,SUBdECTT0 CHANGE _ f AUGUST 18,2020 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Proposed Conceptual Development Plan—NOT APPROVED Conceptual Only II IIIH — OKI I Future Medium- - Future a High Density ' Commercial . Residential � I 9a_9 9 +i gag f 3 I � 1 Rezone Area Not a Part { I Apex Cadence Plat r ilk NP Conceptual Only Subject to Change City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Legal Description for Property Subject to Development Agreement an tNGI PIE EERING Janu@Fif23,2025 Apex Cadence 5uhdlvislon ProJect No.24-1.08 DamtelopmentAgreement Legal[e=iptipn Exh ibft A A parcel of la rid SituatO in a portion of the East W of the Northeast 114 of Section 6,Township 2 North,Range 1 East B-M.,City of Meridian,Ma County,Idaho and being more particularly deKrib-�!d as follows: Commenting at an aluminum cap marking the northeast earner of Seetlon 6 which bears 539'42'21"E a dlstance Of 2rW-00 feet from a 5f8•Inch rebae marking the North 1/4 corner ofsaId 5eetlon 6•thence following tyre easterly IIne of the Nbah"st 114 of said Section 6,SW04'35"E a distance of 746-02 feet: Thence leaving said easterly IinO,NW42'2a"W a 6istanCe of 38.50 feat to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence S0 04'3VF a distance of 1,962.42 feet; Thence N89'22'WW ad istarice of 1,266,46 feet; The nce NOT43'55"W a distance of 49.74 feet; Thence NOO°20'23"W a distance of 549.25 feet; Thence N87'34'26"W a distance of 13,49 feet to the westerip line of said East 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of S+eetion 6; Thence following said west-arly Mine,N00'02'06"W a distance-of 66-71 feet to the weste rly right-af-way lines of the fiawson Carnal, Thence Laving said we5terfy line and follgwir said w�!sterlyr right-of-way Jim the following nine(9) cou rses'. 1- N7r2S'55"E a distance of 161.21 feet; 2. N5j'55'20"E a distance of 74,17 feet; 3. N31'51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet; 4. N10'2S'1o"E a dlstante Of 331.33 feet; S. NOS,26'52"W a distance of 206-26 feet; 6. N18'56 WW a distance of 2$7.65 feet; 7. N32%038"ICY a distance of 91-83 feet; S. N51'32'57'W a distance of 104.61 feet; 9. N74'59'O5'W a distance of 44,02 feet; Thence leaving sold westerly rlght-of-way line,NOO'02'06-W a distance of 396.78 feet; Thence 589'42'20"E a distance of 796-96 feet; Theme SM'0415"E a dis1:8nee of 252J00 feet; Thence 589'42'2WEa distance vf434.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. -5a id pa rce I contains a t Dial of 52.59 acres,more or less, qG ,.a Attached hereto Is Exhlbit Band by titls reference is made a pa rt hereof_ ,,, 12 59 , L, BJ►L� 5725 North ois€owery Way•noise,Idaho 83713-208.639.6433• kmengl Ip.com City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits 9 OF BEARING — — 0 31 9-42 9'42'2E"E 25�p_p-13q' E Lake Hanel Ad 31,32 T_3rf.. R.1E 6 1370.OD' 6 5 +c e POM1T OF COMMENCEMENT � +e H4RTfi 7f ER ALUMINUM CAP ¢ NE CORNER SECTION (h I g O .� � � m Sa9'42'70'E 79G.96' N159 42'2D-W 39.5[}" (TIE} n S Q 200 40 $00 v1 '° 569`42'2O1E a Ut ° Z L$ 4,34.90' a '� - SCALE' 1"=40U' V ' " 1701W OF 1°Eal f BEANIE# -M .+ Cs w U 2 m I x 4 1;, LINE TABLE CL .h ¢, e O i LINE BEARING DISTANCEtA D L1 N07'34'26Y1 13.49 a c _ OIL Area: 52.59±AC. a�u L2 Wi)2'i)6'w 86.73 # +n " A l5wdon Of SS4061200S6 r L3 N78r25'55E 151_21 I b and all of 51406110350 W E, ~ — {~+ 44 NSa'35'26'C 74.17 W— Q DATE: Iaewro ZE L4 Current Zoning;R-4 —L 1-5 N31'51'i0r. 92,01 mOJECT: N-M L3 Proposed Zoning:P-25 _ S rm LO N5'7Ei'52-' 10&26 SHE 1 OF z L7 N32`U8'38�Y B1 93 W CL L8 N61'32'571Y 104.61 kin �ab �z I 1409r20'23 W L9 N7#'S 06'i E 44.42 j urn I 549,25' LIC S4'04'35"E 1 252-00 mil NW43'55'YI 4$.74' ALUMINUM GIP kHrINHA% %di EYM PWIMERS NW22'SU'W 12B6.46' E 1 f4 OORNER SECTION 6 5725 N0aTH pl50awEffKkkV 806E iOanDtl37�3 PH7NE I206J 639 e?M N99'22'M'w 1322.00' City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Rezone Legal Description&Exhibit Map lam E N G I N E E R I N G October 23,2024 Apex Cadence SUbdiv[sion Project No.24-108 Rezone to R-15 Legal Description Exhiblt A A parcel of land situated in a portion of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North,Range 1 East B.M.,City of Merldlan,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as lorlows; Commencing at an aluminum rap marking the northeast corner of Section 6 which bears S89'42'21"E a distance of 2,640.00 feet from a 5/8-inch rebar marking the North 114 corner of said Section 6,thenCe following the easterly line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 5,5,W'04'35"E a distance of 746.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINN ING, Thence following said easterly line,500'04'35"E a distance of 1,925.14 feet t4 an aluminurn cap marking the east 1/4 corner of said Section 6,- Thence leaving said easterly Irne and following the southerly line of said East 1/2 of the Northeast 114 of Section 6,N89'22'50"ova distance of 1,304,25feet; Thence leaving said southerly line,N00`43'57W a distance of 111,26 feet; Thence NOO'20'23"W a distance of 549.25 feet; Then re N87'34'2VW a distance of 13.49 feet to the westerly line of said East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6; Thence following said westerly line,N00'02'06'W a distance of 66.71 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of the Rawson Canal; Thence leaving said westerly line and followingsaidwesterly right-af-way line the following nine(9) C4Ur5e5' 1. N78'25'55"E a distance of 161.21 feet; 2. N54'55'20"E a distance of74.17 feet, 3. N31'S1'12"E a distance of92.01 feet, 4. N10'25'10"E a distance of 381,33 feet; 5_ N05'26'52"W a distance of 105-26 feet; 6, N18°56'20"W a distance of 287.65 feet; 7, N32'08'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet; S. N61'32'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet 9. N74'59'05"W a distance of 44.D2 feet; Thence leaving said westerly right-of-way line,NO0°02'06"W a distance of 396.78 feet; Thence 589'42'29'E a distance of 796,96 feet; Thence 500'04'35"E a distanre of 252.00 feet; 5725 North Discovery Way• 941se,Idaho 53713•208-638.6939• 6 rnengilp-com City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits The-nce$89'42'20'E a di5tanw of 473,40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. � a4 Said parcel contains a total of 55,11 acres, mare or less. ,t} � 4 Attached hereto is Exhibit and by this refe rence isniade a part hereof. a. �12459 � Of, ►Z. yb tv • 3' ` PAGE 12 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits BASES OF BEARING o 31 _ 9142'21'E 2640.00' E Lake Hazel Rd 3 32 T.3M., RAE. 6 5 —E. p c POINT OF COMMENCFJAEHT v sfaaNck RE9hR ALUMINUM CAP IN 15 � sEEi.'TIDNTHI 1 64 CORNER NE CORNER SECTION 6 4' r I Q r- O ¢ � - `a ~ 2 i _ a a L 0 t o F, S 61 0 200 400 600 0 c Z u S89' 2'20"E Q 3 N t Z L7 473,4U to SCALE: 1"=400' t Di o � R�INT i>R o ( B�GINNNG ra +�UU { CR !C Q LU < 4 2 LINE TABLE Rezone Area; 56.11:k AC. :� a _Q LINE B�ARJNG DISTANCE � '7 A Portion of 51406110016 L a b and ali of S1406110350 m LT N7I9'25'S5"E 161.31 ° L2 N54 55'20"E 74.17 L J O DATE: 1305bff 2Lmi L2 V Current Zoning:R-4 (D=t c L3 N31'51'12"E 92.01 PRCMCT. N•b9 Proposed Zoning;R-15 'A_ - 0 5HEE7: �1 L4 t45'26'52-W 106.26 1 OF NOD-C2'.06-W 56.73' L5 N32'06'3a"W 91.63 NS7'34'26"4V 104.61 ` N80'20'73-9 L7 N74'59'45"W 44.02 549.25' L8 Sfl'U4'35"E 252.0a 1/2—INCH REBAR N00'43 55�N ALUMINUM CAP C—E 1/16 CORNER ENGMEEns.5uRvEuOAS.PLAmdPS SEnc)N 6 111.36' _E t/4 CORNER SECTION 5 5725 NORTIlWSCOVFW'WAY N89'22'54"W 1304.25' S /� WAS,LDARawki. PHONE 12DQ 639-69D 17.75' S99 2S7 E k—ngllp.mrn City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Preliminary Plat(dated: 10/9/24 4444124M 12/08/2025) & Phasing Plan PRELIMINARY PLAT SHOWING APEX CADENCE SUBDIVISION A—OF WI MNIVED IN A—10"'OF TIE FAST OF TIENORTNEAPI 214 OF SECTION 6,TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,RANGE I EAST,B,M.. OIIYGF MERIDIAN,ADA CN P�o 0 f� IN 03 III—N- 99e ro ............ ............... ... . I'M 11 1 IS I Ti-7111 APE—DENCE SU R MERIDIAN,ID kiln ---—---—---—--- ----—--- LA MERIDIAN.ID 4 ------- I U= M. 17 City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits o r ! ® ! ! o° ! � a !'aoa ! :l Q.II ! ! 'm. ! � lot aa!01 cal€a!®a el al l � !..® a.:! �•-! � ! _ _��.�� :��a I o ©6 oe �l u�! ®l ®• o? �� o� APE%fADENDp�D MERIDIAN.BD IO .■.IWSI N ■ 0 am■-.i — --------- e e -------------- ....... e]® _ �_ — — ': ;;. ® a ! r® ! ! ! eV :. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. 0 APE%CADENCE Sl,N01V1510M1' MERIDIAN,IOkm e T. �PP2,1 V City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits Ell STREET SECTION A[PRIVATE ALLEY) STREET SECTION F(PRIVATE) ZWT .TR..E ET SECTION B(PUBLIC] �EETSECTION G[PUBLIC) —---------- YM, AP EX—CE SU HT-1- 2 STREET SECnON E(PUBLIC) MERIDIAN,1, 0,k.-Vi City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits NOT APPROVED APEX SOUTHWEST(CADENCE} q L fj p Future' Rezone Only . ............... S Phase 3 Phase 4 -AL ... ............ Q) � a o Phase 2 iin&i Phase 1 cz C Phase 5 0- City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits H. Common Driveway Exhibits—NOT APPROVED � N SVS101THDOl8 = 1I81HX3 3AIHa NONNOD IVId AUVNIWIl3Ud - N �° W y� ffi w a� o ° w ❑I'NVIOIa3N - � a =o i`�4 NOISIAIasns3DN3aVDX3dV Yf, Yp N,l, 'am 3ADN915,1�e1'S 03 93 03 TJ Tea m w m is w � is �� is a id —i• a I—r----- 510E — — — — o ��---- �❑ ti 'I 12 o o Qa�w x 0 GARAGE- r:s ;N,ow s is X 'Fm', o 510E uj �N s I's 5�ri ai z I zu• ;��. 1. - I Q�e ,r I I tOw _Oa 7. I ma� �SIDE L& ui I-.s S3z sl r suE 7 � la I h I tr a L { 510E —�L 1 -10. s � � r 'N1153N H319HtlA4'5 PRESSURIZED , IRRIGATION EASEMENT TO 510E � � BE DETERMINED ' WITH THE "' FINAL PLAT 12, - .OZ w �a�J Fw axe Z mw� wed Mh a W f 'moo a� U� pz 'NI Atlf INW.LNf10W'S u• �N �� a mO� �nzo m op� s w o boo ina ~ II i 'a❑w o� Q zo Ja City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 0 N LZ-£Z S101 T AD019 = 1191HX3 3RRlO NOMOO LVdld AWNIWI13ad r fl 0 0 w jig w OI`MVIGUA NOISIRI09fls UN30tl:)X3dtl S !!HIl1 •aa 3ADaDismo •s ;. S i --- — ----------------------------� —Id y—Id—a Id Id id Id Id a F. SIDE 3 e CS60w O "+ 12' 1 m GARAGE f m 1 —510E J —�J r= SI SIDE mw� Z II ma^ ' '0a: 20' 12. x moo' LEE — SIDE y / - ' Y SIDE f s Q N 12' f N11H9113 I I h N'V3113d'S L SIDE— + a II m C � SIDE 1 a 1 I c + I s 7. N 12• SIDE u ash � z w 1Vld-1 M11 I+ n a u'z 3FIL H11M 03NIWa313p CV x w a cs w w 39 Ol 1431`135e3 M# z M m z o n NDLLV01aal AIIRt�O `ti o V a ]J az 0— 5� n0j m Na — Fpo ow0 io �zo o0 MAW0 osin City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 6L-SL S101 T]I]C?18 = ASIHX33AIa(INOWWODIVIdAUVNIW113Ud m OI'NVIOIa3W : w NOIS'IAIasns 33N30V3 X3dtl z� a " " �j s S nm ¢ a�n awzw 4 � msw tat^ _ � �Nw zz 52.9 w z�a GRAVIIY IRRIGATION W m EASEMENT TO BE _ -.'.r DETERMINED WITH F F a THE FINAL PLAT s 1 ' n 'N1 1H�Ili N VOI13d'S COMMONS �sloE� s r I T DRIVE n �• 11 I FRO FRO GN7/ME GARAG� ; v w n w 1 mom? 1 I �oJ IlI ME' IN a� I za L REAR L RENiJ � REAR RENiJ I s 1 .•.7.• V OWN �o Ia la a Id Id Id la a la PRESSIJRIIE6 n# w u S IRRIGATIDN EASEMENT v)0 w N w� TO RE DETERMINED O z WITH THE FINAL PLAT O II Z N 2 o w J wo C] 2 a�o� 5� P [w i e�Dj,n"oisuMr'xorMMWAww �v.^suw wlcc�awoxonrcu»ImxUrMwnon�rrclswlccnw7ua�cowYun+¢I+ City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits N n LVI-£trl S101 1 IIOOl8 = § O * - 1181HX3 3RRI0 NOWWOO IVId AUVNIWI13Ud LU 01`Md10R1M 0. ❑ W = NOI SW asns 33N3OV3 X3dtl '0113AMD1smo •s Id Id Id Id N Id Id N Id ———— ————— — - F - LJ wBa N � s w 2 GARAGE^ 1 m sl —SIDE A �°CJ woo a� �a O w 2�� _ 2°, N I s 12 I I a a 0 �` ) — SIDE - - T SIDE a Iw � sl Nl 1S3N H3l9HtlM'S �`' a SIDE } 12' N PRE53URIZEO 20 IRRIGATION SIDE EASEMENT TO BE OETERM INEO WITH THE N5N d-3 Id Id d Id a Id FINAL PLAT uS ¢ rti -_Now ---- — -------- Y � Q a �xo m w rr a 'Nl Avr NI ViNn OW'S ' a �Rt-I � N aooa O II O mod .108 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits Z91'9si SIM i 117O18 = £ * 731 1191HX3 3RRI0 NON NOD laid AUVNIWIl3Ud w LU 4 aiNVIalON NOISIAiasns 3:)N3avD X3dtl s S nJgq }S d3 d3 d3 d d3 d3 d3 d3 d3 �3 93 M `.13 `]3 ti3 0 03 M- I e I I 1 I I , s L_ ------ _-- —. rr Id Id Id Id Id H Id Id N Id- s i T SIDE Rio 20' GARAGE o FRONT SIDE J �yym ac3m� SIDE 1Ng a a;' I s 20' 1p �o 0 I s 1¢ V SIDE T SIDE C n 20' 0' s d 'L SIDE I I T SIDE E. - o wR — o SIDE o a f rl z �aa Y el ZE. O 0 a ww µ 1 1 Y GRA EASEMENT VTY IRRIGATION ION 4 x an d BE DETERMINED WITH w O ¢? THE FINAL PLAT z� o`no lri ar4i w Ln Ja m0 S N r W- a O II ip Oi J oza ❑ z ao x os� City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 0 1Nq v9Z-6sz S101 i 117U1a w 1I91HX3 3AIaO NOW WOD 1YId AUVN IVY Il3ad Lu o OI`NVlCllU3W a NOISIMaans3:)N30tl:)X3dtl s S ua a 9w 2= 4 �~ ennd Gqy r9N� wo wzg' w �oNo� oz� PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION AND GRAVTY IRRIGATION a #Y o w w ` EASEgEFIF TO BE N w w� DETERMINED WITH 1E s� �'°w$ j I FINAL PLAT m a m r n a F g o€ III Ow �o SIDE nJ y a_26 12 10, E. .. I 3x !s SIDE 0 a S.OWLSUMMIT I.N. - r T SIDE I s I I SIDE � I m r SIDE s I L J—SIDE I � I •• r —T SIDE— — Z w�� 1 2 m4 Ij 12 ,G• ..�Q ` r. zs — —SIDE �I F — — — — — — — F.. a$za 1 I SIDE W_a_ I 12• t rl g�II I I I N — �j( J —SIDE GRAVITY IRRIGATION EASEMENT TO BE DETERMINED WITH e ~ II THE FINAL PLAT - z 7 N=rvLL J- w��w KGr rc � City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits I. Landscape Plan and Fencing Plan(dated: October 2024) il Tc� .....«..... eJ! I-,fi 3 R s o w iE�e 1. fl 'oo afia� v 8 w o 3 e sl', 3 g' q �10 1;ask� °� a ��•g 3 1� ��c w a � � g a a a n:a i.a s`'a d Stl�� S�fN 2"- u e$A 3�� g � 1�Fo � s � w �- ��g� to R� ❑o =- E I�3'rMUREa3��e�� g�= �«� M ^asp a i - ---------- - --------a., €o e 1 s--! 2�$ e i e 000000- . o"000000ao -_000aooa"_oo _ " IN w g � o R x s a s s a s a R"a a a a Ey�§aye C Y e3 — 1 a . o1 YI 00000 000eo �1 0000 a gge gYp es ti; y533 g g5 wg 2 3 33 E d d1 d F S�' £ Hip @k�ilg9? QQ 1$ gigg, s b Waw qq dB � ! 1 3 1 1 £ 3 1 1 a 3 Ala ".I."• - a UN N1 Aug rl N III I eHHD o m Q- // lw 3 h• O R 3 i City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits w�P'{zFz sons �I��;��V€�2s3;e all w€l €e5' F w�,e€11 Elmo 6We o 3 age=s ��is '� a �3, 'Tom'Tomz �= `z $§'€ P..Q ��a55@33_w ax3"3 a. �3 W— ::s��.� � @Y' bFb W ss€oEy Him a BEE .;a O i ¢ d HH tl � 1 �1 ® ® ® ® 1 III C ® p P � a X`a` n..:t - IT flu, ;1 :: alall% z City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits i ew g E7 �q ga U V V'2MM�! ON,i� - Ng uga 1z -OF ............. ...... ...... —4 J4 �4 1�� (K (1) 3D S 41� .....----- (P 6 rr City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits € � ON a z o Ln n �� it MIN �o � E Zap VIP�� 5 � s w 110 3 ygc 2 IIIII ��fm�a� Ow.sinr�" s ea � Y eOaf 9 § 3 ,- AN. a _�22 caw IqR y € tlaF�sa o n I I I — } S !9 ®® ®m®n®T T e M.:."l 9:� J OO,®Y®OO .O a0 ®p©0 O OD I- ® � �dn ® ®p ®7 ® i O 3 3_ ' z p pJ ® ® ® lQlpp �® W •ppC: p ® a �n COD a Z :I�.. OD M City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits J. Qualified Open Space Exhibit& Site Amenity Exhibits (dated: October 2024) a w :5 o = m�y y¢2 z�g s�< x g 4 � e a g s B 3 � a n R p 3 ® T lR1e ® I 4`I Q T 7 S[I t n v nrn� �L�p] 1 i 0 0 0 J City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 7 f. BOCCE BALL COURTS REFERENCE PHOTO i -4 PICKLEBALL COURTS REFERENCE PHOTO E.SPIRE LN. 4 2 BOCCE :r BALL �COURTS� BLOCK i PICKLEBALL y: E�y COURTS J w; w 3 Q :z• 0 CiUBHOUSF �y -10,700 5F 3 - '•� L City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits K. Conceptual Building Elevations ELEVATIONS The homes along Locust Grove Road will incorporate articulation!n design to provide visual variety. Typical elevations are shown below. Conventional Single Family(typical to the non-age restricted homes) i y14 ry ^r t y� City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits Carriage Lane Single Family Detached f typrcol to Cadence] rZ NONE ;- - = TI ■ TIHT Single Family Paired(typical to Cadence) I � I n offs -_ cum City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits L. Deviations from the R-15 Dimensional Standards Proposed with the PUD Horne Type Street Setback to Street Interior Rear Living Area Setback to Side Garage Carriage Lane, Alley Loaded Alley-5 ft 5 ft 3 ft Alley—N/A, see (Age Restricted)** Local - 5 ft (10 ft) street setback Paired Cadence, Front Loaded 10 ft 20 ft 3 ft 12 ft (Age Restricted)"'I Conventional, Front Loaded 10 ft 20 ft 3 ft 12 ft (NOT Age Restricted *Proposed Setback(Standard Setback in the R-15 Zone) ** 'Carriage Lane"is Brighton's term for"alley loaded"homes. '"Paired Cadence"is Brighton's term for"duplex"style,age restricted,homes. "Street Setback"shall only refer to a setback directly adjacent to right-of-way.When a common lot is adjacent to a lot"Interior Side"setback shall be used to determine the setback. _ 'r — iRFL PPIMI i { � ..AGF AFSiRICTF" � [ornuurxrr � I u ,r l5 BITIC F 9�e�Gl 'E.lVG�ER NO i:Fvf I r utnT F L AAR4 Riga. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits M. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map km ENGINE ERIN G September 26,2025 Project No_:24-168 Apex Cadence Subdivision Exhibit A Legal Deserip#ion for Annexation To the City of Meridian A parcel of land for arinexation to the City of Meridian being a portion of Government Lot 1 and the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5,Township 2 North, Range 1 East, B.M.,Ada County, Idaho being more partIcularly described as follows: Connmencing at a 5f 8-inch re bar marking the Southwest Conner of said Government Lot 1, which bears S00"02'06"E a distance of 1,337.30 feet from a 518-inch rebar marking the Northwest corner of said Government Lot 1,thence fallowing the westerly line flf said Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4,SOW02'06"E a distance of 598.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly line,N78"25'S5"E a distance of 161.21feet; Thence N54'S5'2C"E a distance of 74.17 feet; Thence N31"51'12"E a distance of 92.01 feet; Thence N10'25'10"E a distance of 381.33 feet; Thence N05'26'52"W a distance of 106.26 feet; Then ce'N18'56'20"W a distance of 287.55 feet; Thence N32'08'38"W a distance of 91.83 feet; Thence N51'32'57"W a distance of 104.61 feet.- Thence N74`59'05'W a distance of 44.02 feet; Thence N00'02'WW a distance of 27.96 feet to the centerline of the Rawson Canal; Thence following said centerline the following nine(9)courses: 1. 574'59'05"E a distance of 54.46 feet; 2. S61"32'57"E a distance of 114.87 feet; 3 532°06'38"E a distance of 102.04 feet; 4. 5.18"56'20"E a distance of 293.97 feet; 5. 505'26'52"E a distance of 113.22 feet; 6. S10"25'10"W a distance of 390.20feel; 7_ 531*51'12"W a distance of 102.63 feet; 8. S54'55'2V'W a distance of 85.30feet; 9_ 578`25'55'W a distance of 172.34 feet to the westerly line of said Southeast 1f4 of the Northeast 114; Thence leaving said centerline and following said westerly liner NO9'02'06"W a distance of 27.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 5725 North ols[awary way• Balss,Idaho 83711 G 208.639.6939+ ke "ZIIP_aom City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Said parcel contaiins a total of 0.86 acres, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/o r rights-of-way of record or irnpH ed- Attached hereto is Exhibit Band by this reference is made apart hereof. QI- uo a Dd or PAGE City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits NORTHWEST CORNER OMfT LOT 1 FOUND 5J8- REDAR S74'59'05"f: 54.46' N40'02'p6'1V S61'32'57'E 27-96' 1 14.87' I M74'59'05"W 532"08'38% 44.02' N61'32'57W 102,04' 104.61' V ri N32'08'38"W z rk 91.53' r3 CIENTERLINE OF THE -s 's PAWSON CANAL POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SOUTHWEST CORNER GOV'T LOT 1 FOUND 5/8" REM 4 M0526'52V n ^113,22' 26'S2�E i 13. 106.26' DAVID& KRISTIN 3 TUR N BULL FAM I LY TR UST 3 I E� APN;S14061130355 (PORTION) c ANNEKAT1OM AREA:0.86±AC CURRENT ZONING. RUT 0 r t O f W3 on L z v G;, N31'51'12'E - 92-01 P I N54 55'20"E z 74.17' S31'51'12V 5 102.63' POINT OF BEGINNING ,, N7925'55"E 161.21' N00'02'deu S54'55'20"W 27-Sfi 85-30' S78'25'55'W 0 150 30D a50 n E N G I N E E R I N G — 172,34' plan Scale: V= 156' p S775 RE RFH OISCOVERT WAY = 96LSE,IQAHD E3M rFlos,E�3ua�639 a93s E H I BIT D bnen¢Ilv.son AN NE?ATIE�N TO THE CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE: SEP'TEMUR Z025 IWIE T: 11-118 SHEET: APEX CADENCE SUBDIVISION 1 OF 1 G VT LOT 1, SE1/4 NE1/4 SEC, G, T2 N, R1 E, BM, ADA COUNTY, 1DAH0 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits N. De-Annexation Legal Description&Exhibit Map I= E N G I N E E It I N G Septeminer 26,2W5 Project No_:24-108 Apex Cadence Subdivision Exhibit A Legal Description for Do-Annexation From the City of Meridian A parcel of land for de-annexation from the City of Meridian being a portion of the Southeast 114 of the Northeast 1/4 and the Northeast 114 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 2 North,Range 1 East, B.M„City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho being more particularly described as follows, Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the East 114 corner pf said Section 6,which beam 500°04'35"E a distance of 2,671.16 feet from an alum!num cap marking the Northeast corner of said Section.6,thence following the northerly line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4,N89'22'50"W a distance of 1,304.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said northerly line,S00'42'27"E a distance of 601.03 feet; Thence N52'05'35'W a distance of 31.44 fleet to the westerly line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1f4; Thence following said westerly line,N00'02'10"W a distance of 581-86 feet to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 114 of the Southeast 1/4(Center-East IJIG cornea; Thence leaving the westerly line of said Northeast 114 of the Southeast V4 and following the westerly line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4,N0702'06"W a distance of 660.87 fee#, Thence leaving saidwesterly line,587"34'26"E a distance of 13.49feet; Thence SOV2023"E a distance of 549.25 feet; Thence 500'43'55"E a distance of 111.26 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 0,52 1cres,mare ar less,and is sub*ct to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied_ Attached hereto Is Exhibit B and by this refereme is made a part hereot. ii rr�� ,a L 2 0 OF L. a .24. 5725 North Diiooywy Way u DoIw, Idatio a 37 13■706,09.69�3■krnengilF.com City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits NORTHEAST CORNED SECTION 6 I FOUND ALUMINUM CAP E. LAKE HAZEL R€7. 31 32 587'34'26"E 5 5 13-49' LO oE-ANNEXATION 70TA1 AREA: 0.52±ACLk- m o � GARY R. MU ROD ITI0 in ' APN-51406141570 CURRENT ZONING: R-P I POINT OF COMMENCEMENT r,,29APIN; 5-E EAST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 6 CENTER-EAST 1 f i 6 CORNER FOUND ALUMINUM CAP NB9'22'50'W 1304.25' (TIE) F ElEGINNING G7 J M U RGOITIO LLC vi ao 140641770D(PORTION) ENrotvlNc: � I CIA n � I N 0 200 400 600 Plan Scate: 1" =200' a E N52'05'35"W a � I � I E N G I N E E R I N G 5725 N4RrK OGGIM ERY WAT = BaSE.IDAHO 23713 EXHIBIT I�PHDNE j2W)1539i539 Bmenghp.c m DE-ANNEXATION FROM THE CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE: iEFTETYMER 2D25 s FNCYIEC-f: I4-700 APEX SHEFF. CADENCE l.1BDI I ION 1 OF I SE1J4 NE1/4, NE1/4 5E1/4,SEC. 6,T2N, RLE,13M,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits � # i SO 5 I I ' 4 1 idw F A.. ■I i� i VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES &DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days. Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development, government, and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2<5.0; R-4<2.0; R-8< 1.0; R-15 <0.5; R-40<0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area.Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan(e.g.pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.).Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources, including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F.Letter A represents free flow conditions, and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian I Department Report V111. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D, stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians,nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP). The IFYWP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP). The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation Apex Cadeirice Preliminary Plat , Planned Unit Development City Council December 16th , 2025 49,11- BRIGHTON Apex Cadence Pre- Plat Apex Cadence is the latest development in the PINNACLE - �� =r , Nna� - A � rr _ community at the intersection of r Lake Hazel and Locust Grove. The NNAcIF � F �._ Preliminary Plat includes .. .� BRIGHTON CONCEpTVAL,SLIBIECTTO CHANGE i • 212 residential lots n an age- JIM qualified, gated community _.,. with rivate streets. °TYPE"'° r _ �I°`-UU LO IL - .- . T • Includes a mix of single r POP RE DNA PFUTURE DEVELLOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT c-c DT HL A family detached, carriage �L°PMkNI FNTD� oevELOPmENr "d � lane, and paired homes. - • 16 conventional single-family DTNNf oE4FwPMENT FUTUHE DEVELOPMORM ENT homes accessed from a public - I� --E_V_1aN°NENTosr cul-de-sac. 3 49,11- BRIGHTON Zoning APEX OUTHEM The area depicted is NO Of currently zoned R-8, we - _ ---- request the entire area rLi be rezoned to R-15 for AkEX--- UTHEAST greater flexibility inNOO design and setbacks. r- G I I I Rezone from R-8 to R-15 ' II I 4 49,11- BRIGHTON Future Land Use Apex Cadence has a mix of designations on the Future Land Use Map including: Rezone only Medium Density Residential Medium-High Density Residential Mixed Use Community -- ' Pre-plat lid area i No FLUM modification is requested . s BRIGHTON Future • Use Compliance Mixed-Use Community Area Mixed-Use Community: "Residential densities ... between 20% and 50% of the development area" Existing Existing 140At M C-C Zone R-15 Zone � ., - Apex Cadence complies with a mix of = ; a roximatel ^'50% residential and N50% non- residential . residential . :M 1 •• Medium Density Residential : "allows for ... . densities Requested of three to eight dwelling units per acre" Rezone to R-15 Apex Cadence complies at 4.6 units per acre. --- 6 49101- BRIGHTON ' • . 000000 J- 0000000 D 0 D 0 A small portion of the lot was not included in i a 0 0 #0 the original annexationPE- 5 (which was completed Annex with ° - -- with the mass "South zoning — µ - - - --- designation Meridian Annexation ) ��; � t a - of R-15 r 4 00 To proceed with development, the entire parcel must be in the 0 0 _ 0 City of Meridian, - � = o � therefore this sliver of _ . 0 0 � 0 the property must be annexed . - 49111- BRIGHTON De A sliver of land should not have been annexed ==.---Y. _ 1 during the mass "South Meridian Annexation". I a� � fL'I i7RF C3FVFI OFrvFFIr I C C A Record of Surveywas created, but not recorded _ JP � prior to the mass annexation, which showed the correct boundary. _ _ - - • First action de-annex from Meridian - • Next, the County will rezone the parcel • Finally, the owner can do a property Al, boundary adjustment to incorporate the parcel with the remainder of their property. rf, De-annex ' REQUEST: Require de-annexation is completed prior to the back to `Y signature of phase 5 final plat. Ada County 8 BRIGHTON Plann Unit Development A Planned Unit Development provides us flexibility in set back requirements and allows for a private gated community. This PUD style of development has been very successful in our other Cadence developments. The changes identified below allow for comfortable, beautiful, and functional community and home designs. • • - • M ' - Restricted)Carriage Lane (Age Alley — S ft S ft 3 ft Alley — N/A Local — S ft (10ft) Paired Cadence (Age Restricted) 10 ft 20 ft 3 ft 12 ft Conventional10 ft 20 ft 3 ft 12 ft 9 44 - BRIGHTON Phasing II�I�M�`��I ► ��IIIII�4�IIIIIII � � ,, • • 1 • • • • • • • FUTURE - RezoneDEVELOPMENT 1 I - In M �z C ' . lot * Al • I • I + i 4 44 - BRIGHTON Private Street Connection Point Apex Cadence gains access from as well as Locust Grove Road, two other connections, one north and one south . T We provide —190 feet of stacking ... ....- 1904" ( roughly 10-11 cars) before the gated entry. For reference, other gated entries require only 50 feet . ...... of stacking, per code. 0 0 0 4D 0 a *Request — Approve a private street connection from an arterial roadway O 0 BRIGHTON Block Length Waiver Request 4 11.•.' Apex Cadence has a block that exceeds the length standard a block face [shall not 1ttaift ® o 0 0 li exceed] 1200 feet unless waived by City : ° g ® T 0 as � Council' 9 m� ° ° ® ® TT (D . : l.. Traffic calming ( blue) will reduce speeds 017 rt pk° X �9H1°3 x along the road . The gated entries prevent !mil mv-di N1-iffi ✓, ". excess or "cut through" traffic from using o a this roadway. ao © o o o -=11 M31W 3 V � I I ^ The Rawson Canal restricts our design and ,�¢af�t6 s s y a o c vnroa M,NY.]atl� , o o n g O ® nt =— calming ` P � u ai � �b�a0��7�, p O is the catalyst for the long roadway design . p o 0 I O O I .i 131VNtlA7'M 3VI]Y'] - O Q 0 oQ o oop o o *Request — Approve a street greater than 1200 feet long. ° CD0000a If 12 BRIGHTON Apex Cadence Features Apex Cadence requires 10 amenity points and is proposed with 22 points. These include : • 10,700 square foot clubhouse (6points) • Four sports courts (12points) • Two Bocce Ball • Two Pickleball • Multi-use pathways (2 points) • Pathways in linear open space (2 points) Apex Cadence requires 15% open space in the R-15 zone and provides 18.9%. 13 -;- BRIGHTON Connection and Vibrancy a a t �, tY — a- - saw . r SO 0 RES ��F„ uuuwu„i ,E��.• l IM �;- BRIGHTON Amenity examples - - Bocce Ball Court Example Pickle Ball Court Example Mille, 1llei : 7 Clubhouse Example �;- BRIGHTON Elevations �1 1A � III • . • • • • . . • • t L- :. • • • r ♦ L Conventional - � y' Single-Family ' _ W (typical to the non-age restricted u �. homes) l �;- BRIGHTON Elevations 1' t - Paired Cadence ( restricted e ag ) �tr� �� o��, _ MAW Iffi- I ML Iry =s1, - - -- 11 m ` f s E Imp- �;- BRIGHTON Elevations 4.0 40 mom 1 Carriage Lane (age restricted) _ Changes49,11- BRIGHTON • Conditions A.1.c. The northern portion of the subject property to be rezoned (Parcel #S1406110016) shall be incorporated into a subsequent plat I , prior to submittal of any building permit applications for that portion of said property. , +^ ^s+ ,h'erh A 'PO-PE-,' ,16„4SO^r ^f IARGI f^r v Ie . Reasoning: We do not own or control the Murgoitio property and therefore should not be forced to incorporate it into our project. A.1.e. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the development except for permits associated with community amenities, including but not limited to pool, pool house, and gazebos. Reasoning: To have amenities installed and active for residents, we need to be able to start construction ahead of final plat signature. This is especially important when we need to construct certain aspects ahead of winter weather. 19 Changes49,11- BRIGHTON • Conditions, Cont. 2.o. Prior to submttal-ef the fiFSt final P'-A+ signature of the Phase 5 final plat, the property boundary adjustment between Parcel #S1406131700, S14064278001 S1406417700 and S1406110355 shall be finalized. The Applicant shall submit proof of such in the form of an approval letter from Ada County and a recorded Record of Survey. Reasoning: The process for completing this task is outside of our control - Ada County and the rightful property owner must complete these tasks. Additionally, the only phase of the project affected by the adjustment is phase 5. 2.p. The 10-foot-wide detached sidewalks along S. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Via Roberto St. shall be constructed eRtiFety with the f-+IrSt rpa hi a sLfde '�T at the time the adjacent phase is constructed. Reasoning: The sidewalk will not connect to any existing infrastructure and needs to be constructed with each phase to make sure the roadway and grading is accurate, so the sidewalk is at the appropriate height and slope. 2.q. The 10-foot wide multi-use pathway along the Rawson Canal shall be constructed ,,,-its entiFety with he s^rA.Rd Phase of devel^pm eRt at the time the adjacent phase is constructed. Reasoning: The pathway will not connect to anything existing and should be constructed in concurrence with the phase it will provide connection for. 20 BRIGHTON Conclusion We concur with the staffs recommendation of approval , with the requested modifications to the conditions of approval as described , and request Planning & Zoning recommend approval of: Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development, Block Length Waiver, Rezone, Gated Entry from an Arterial Road , Annexation , and De-Annexation . 21 9ht0 n com`� Discussion W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Apex Zenith (H-2025-0041) by Brighton Corporation, generally located at the southeast corner of Meridian Rd. and Lake Hazel Rd., in a portion of Lot 4 Section 6, T.2N., R.1E. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2025-0041 A. Request: Preliminary Plat to subdivide two (2) existing parcels into seven (7) buildable lots across 11.549 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. B. Request: Private Street application that is naming the drive aisles. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: December 16, 2025 ITEM # 23 PROJECT NAME: Apex Zenith (H-2025-0041) by,Brighton Corporation, generally located at the southeast corner of Meridian Rd. and Lake Hazel Rd., in a portion of Lot 4 Section 6, TIN., RAE I wish to testify Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing (f ark X 110A? (Please Print) yes) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 12/16/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location _ TO: Mayor& City Council 1::Area of impact W= City Limits FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis �- 208-884-5533 - nnapoli@meridiancity.org -----_=__ APPLICANT: Amanda McNutt SUBJECT: H-2025-0041 ' Apex Zenith I LOCATION: Located at the southeast corner of -� ( I Meridian Road and Lake Hazel Road in a — portion of Lot 4 of Section 6, T.2N., R.IE. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Preliminary plat to subdivide two(2)existing parcels into seven(7)buildable lots across 11.065 acres of land in the C-G zoning district. B. Waivers/Issues Since both E.Tower Lane and S.Momentum Lane are connecting to arterial streets (Meridian Road and Lake Hazel Road),these access points would typically require a City Council waiver per UDC 11-3F-4-2B2. However,these connections were previously approved with the annexation and rezone application(H-2024-0052)so another council waiver is not required. C. Recommendation Staff. Approval with conditions. Commission: Approval with no proposed changes to the staff report. D. Decision Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial - Existing Zoning C-G zoning VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning C-G zoning Adopted FLUM Designation Mixed Use Regional VII.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 6/10/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 8/14/2025 Site posting date 12/3/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.E • Comments Received Yes; Staff Report - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Arterial Streets: E.Lake Hazel and S.Meridian Road - Collector Streets: S.Prevail Avenue • Traffic Level of Service Lake Hazel Road:Better than"E" - ITD Comments Received Yes;The applicant is finalizing the STARS agreement with ITD. Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received or see the public record. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics ReFerence Parcel: 51406223014 Date Retrieved: 202411018 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 220 5Fr1 Surrounding Area % of city � I City Limits Not City He usehold Change Household & Population Growth • • # Household= ■2020 Population Chance: 88.2% Population NGrowtl, (Household and Population Change since203-0 Decennial) Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics 0 E. Lake Hazel Road Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes Existing Level of Service Notable ACHD Comments V/ Q {Primary roadway impact} Programmed IFYP Programmed CIP 0 S. Meridian Rd Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes m Existing Level of Service Notable r Comments V/ Q (Primary roadway impact Programmed IFYP Programmed CIP *E.Lake Hazel Road has been widened by the applicant to S lanes from S.Meridian Road to S.Apex Avenue. The level of service listed above is for the existing 2-lane road Traffic counts are from June 2018. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService • • Ready O O O O Marginal O O Caution O O O O O �ooa a o\``e �aAy a� oQ' oo� 0\0 a� hr h`,co Qa �o City of Meridian Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject properties fall within the larger Apex Zenith project and are designated as Mixed-Use Regional on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). The MU-R designation is intended to encourage a balanced blend of employment opportunities, retail,residential dwellings,and public uses,particularly in areas near major arterial intersections. This designation supports a diverse and integrated community where residents can live,work,and shop without needing to travel far. An important component of the MU-R designation is to avoid predominantly single-use developments. The applicant is proposing a preliminary plat consisting of seven(7)buildable lots across 11.065 acres of land. The plat excludes the additional approximately 140 acres of land as a separate plat will be required with phase two(2) of the larger development. Staff recommends the subject properties be subdivided prior to the issuance of any building permits within the subdivision. However,this subdivision is part of the first phase of the Apex Zenith project,which restricts phase one(1)to three(3)building permits prior to a more in-depth concept plan is provided. Currently, Costco will be using two(2)of the three(3)building permits, and it was previously stated that a regional employment user would be the third building permit on the west side of Prevail Avenue. For this reason, staff is recommending the subdivision be recorded and Phase two (2)of Apex Zenith be approved prior to any building permits being issued within the subdivision. The applicant has indicated the subdivision is proposed to be completed in a single phase with buildings being constructed at a later date when users are found. Each user will be evaluated when they submit for a certificate of zoning compliance application. The property is allowed to have all the uses listed in UDC 11-213-2. Table 4: Pro*ect Overview Description Details History H-2015-0019 AZ;DA Inst#2016-007072;H-2024-0052;DA Inst#2025- 010344 Phasing Plan One(1)Phase Acreage 11.065 acres Lots Seven(7)Buildable lots B. History The two parcels fronting S.Meridian Road(S 1406223014 and S 1406223153)were annexed in 2015 with the South Meridian Annexation. These properties were given the placeholder zoning of R-4 until future development. In 2024,the property was rezoned to the C-G zoning district as a part of the larger Apex Zenith project. After the annexation the applicant submitted a property boundary adjustment to reconfigure the properties to allow for legal parcel for development. This is the reason why Costco is not included within this subdivision. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The site currently has no existing structures. The applicant shall be required to hook up to city utilities with the construction of the new buildings. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The subject properties were rezoned with the C-G zoning designation,which allows for a variety of uses. The narrative discusses the subdivision being consistent with commercial users that include large retail, office uses, and other supporting commercial. Currently,the existing Development Agreement limits certain uses, specifically restricting retail uses to a maximum of 50%of the C-G zoning district. In addition,the DA requires a minimum of 20% non-retail commercial uses within the C-G portion of the property. These restrictions aim to align with the comprehensive plan to provide a mix of commercial uses that include retail, employment, and neighborhood-serving uses. The property will remain subject to the same Development Agreement provisions,along with the restrictions in UDC 11-2B-2. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The C-G zoning district requires a thirty-five(35)foot landscape buffer along entryway corridors,a twenty-five(25) foot landscape buffer along arterial roads,a twenty(20) foot landscape buffer along collector roads, a ten(10) foot landscape buffer along local streets and allows a height up to sixty-five(65) feet. The applicant has not provided any building footprints; however,the submitted plans meet the requirements of the C-G zone.Any future development shall comply with the C-G dimensional standards listed in UDC 11-2B-3. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): The subject subdivision does not show a concept plan for placement of the buildings; however,the development agreement requires a minimum of 40%of the buildable frontage to be occupied by building facades or public space. This will be evaluated with the certificate of zoning compliance submittals. The applicant will be required to frame buildings along the arterial and state highway corridors to meet this provision. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A thirty-five(35) foot wide landscape buffer is required along all entryway corridors (Meridian Road), a twenty-five(25) foot wide landscape buffer is required along all arterial roadways(Lake Hazel Road), a ten(10) foot landscape buffer is required along all local streets(Tower Lane and Momentum Lane). These landscape buffers are depicted on the landscape plan and comply with the standards for the C-G zoning district. However,the preliminary plat shows a significant portion of the landscaping is proposed to be inside of the right of way. The applicant shall provide a license agreement with the transportation authority to certify the entire landscape buffer will meet UDC requirements. The buffers shall be outside of the proposed deceleration lanes and start at the back of the curb. Additional landscaping on each lot will be addressed with future certificate of zoning compliance applications. These landscape buffers and the private streets (Tower Lane and Momentum Lane)have not been installed yet. These will be required as part of the subdivision improvements. The applicant is proposing the subdivision to be completed in a single phase. The applicant shall comply with the vegetation coverage calculations with the final plat to ensure they are meeting the 70%vegetation coverage at maturity with no more than 65%of this coverage coming from lawn or other grasses. These buffers shall be landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. In addition,the development agreement requires the landscape buffer included in this subdivision to be completed prior any building occupancy within the larger Apex Zenith development, including Costco. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis ii. Parking lot landscaping Landscaping is required to be provided along all parking areas per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8. The requirements include five(5) foot perimeter adjacent to streets and islands of at least 50 sq. ft.per every twelve(12)parking spaces. Any parking that does not abut seven(7) feet of overhang shall have parking blocks. These requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses Landscaping is required to be provided along abutting uses. These requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. iv. Tree preservation A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. v. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales shall not be within the landscape buffers along Meridian Road and Lake Hazel Road. 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6B requires one space for every five hundred(500)sq. ft. of gross floor area in commercial districts. However,if restaurants are proposed one(1)space for every two hundred and fifty(250) sq. ft of gross floor area is required. These parking standards will be analyzed with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance applications. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. This will be reviewed with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance applications. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Building elevations were submitted with this application but are high level and not specified for any single building. The proposed elevations include a mix of materials,pedestrian scale elements such as lighting and awnings, and glazing along the storefronts. In addition,the development agreement that governs the site requires development to be consistent with the Meridian Architectural Standards Manual. Staff will evaluate the building elevations for consistency with the ASM and DA with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance and design review applications. 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): Fencing is not depicted on the concept or landscape plan. Any future fencing shall be in compliance with UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6. 6. Parkways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-17): UDC 11-3A-17 requires parkways of a minimum width of 8 feet. The applicant has indicated in their narrative that the parkways are 8 feet in width,however it is not dimensioned on the landscape plan. These parkways are provided along the private streets within the development alongside the five(5)foot sidewalks. The parkways shall be dimensioned and a minimum of 8 feet in width in the final plat application. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access is proposed via E. Tower Lane(private street)off E. Lake Hazel Road in the form of a right-in right-out, S. Momentum Lane(private street) off S.Meridian Road in the form of a right-in right-out out and S. Prevail Avenue in the form of a full access. The applicant is applying for a private street application for E. Tower Lane and S. Momentum Lane to allow for the commercial drive aisles to be named. This will allow for better wayfinding of address points for residents and emergency services. With the larger Apex Zenith development(H-2024-0052),the development agreement requires the entirety of Aristocrat Drive and Prevail Avenue(both collector roads)to be constructed prior to the first certificate of occupancy. These roads will be constructed along with E. Tower Lane and S.Momentum Lane prior to the certificate of occupancy for the subdivision or Costco. A traffic study was completed with H-2024-0052,which contemplated approximately 98 acres of commercial uses,which include the portion of the subdivision that is currently proposed. Direct lot access to S. Meridian Road and E. Lake Hazel Road is prohibited except for E. Tower Lane and S. Momentum Lane. The applicant is depicting a second access along E. Tower Lane(private street)to Lot 4, Block 1;however, staff is recommending a shared access on the property line with the Costco Fuel Station(Parcel# S 1406223040). The site plan on the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application(A-2025-0078)for Costco depicted an access point on the shared property line. In addition,the applicant has recorded a singed STARS agreement with the Idaho Transportation Department(ITD)which has highlighted improvements to Meridian Road including deceleration lanes at their access points. These improvements are anticipated to be completed prior to certificate of occupancy for the Costco project. 2. Multiuse Pathways,Pathways, and Sidewalks (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-5, UDC 11-3A-8, UDC 11-3A-17): The preliminary plat proposes an extension of the ten(10) foot multi-use pathway along S. Meridian Road and E. Lake Hazel Road. In addition,the applicant is proposing five (5)foot sidewalks along the private streets on the interior of the subdivision to promote pedestrian connectivity. However,the pedestrian connections from the multi-use pathway to the front entrances of each building have not been depicted. The pedestrian connections shall be depicted with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance and design review applications for each site. 3. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): The applicant is proposing two(2)private streets in the form of E. Tower Lane and S. Momentum Lane with this application. These private streets are depicted on the plat and have an eighty-six(86) foot easement that spans across the full street section including forty(40) foot street width, eight(8) foot parkways, five(5)foot sidewalks on both sides, and ten(10) feet of landscaping on the back of the sidewalk. Since the plat is located within the MU-R FLUM designation,it is critical to have connectivity for pedestrians that are integrated with vehicular access points. The applicant has provided five (5)foot sidewalks on both sides of the private streets which will connect with City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis ten(10)foot multi-use pathways along Meridian Road,Lake Hazel Road, and Prevail Avenue. This will help promote the connectivity and walkability that is envisioned in the MU-R principles. No residential units are proposed directly off of these private streets as this section of the larger Apex Zenith project is designated for commercial uses. The applicant is showing two(2)access points to E. Tower Lane for Lot 4,Block 1 and the off-site property for the Costco Fuel Station. Staff is recommending these be consolidated into a single access point off of the private street due to limiting conflict points. The approved Costco CZC depicted a shared access point that was on the property line between proposed Lot 4,Block 1 and the Costco Fuel Facility. Since both E.Tower Lane and S.Momentum Lane are connecting to arterial streets (Meridian Road and Lake Hazel Road),these access point would typically require City Council waivers per UDC 11-3F-4-2132. However,these connections were previously approved with the annexation and rezone application(H-2024-0052)so another council waiver is not required. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): There is an existing irrigation ditch that runs through the property connecting to the east and west. The applicant is proposing to pipe this ditch and protect the existing irrigation boxes. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be installed to provide irrigation to each lot in the subdivision in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development.All utilities are available to the site. Water main, fire hydrant and water service require a twenty- foot(20)wide easement that extends ten(10)feet past the end of main,hydrant, or water meter.No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. 1V. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. Future development of this site shall comply with the previous conditions of approval and terms of H-2015-0019 AZ; H-2024-0052 AZ,RZ;DA Inst#2025-010344 and the conditions contained herein. 2. Future development of the proposed lots is required to comply with the dimensional standards C-G zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2B-3, as applicable. The 35-foot wide entryway corridor street buffer,25-foot-wide arterial street buffer,20-foot wide collector street, and 10- City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions foot landscape buffers along the private streets. Buffers may be placed in an easement rather than a common lot in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2a. 3. The final plat and landscape plan shall be revised as follows: a. Provide the license agreement from ACHD and ITD for landscaping within the transportation authority's right of way. b. Add a plat note or reference the CCR instrument number for cross-access and maintenance of the private streets. c. Depict landscaping within required street buffers in accord with standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C,_all required landscape buffers along streets shall be designed and planted with a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative ground cover. Plant materials in conjunction with site design shall elicit design principles including rhythm, repetition,balance, and focal elements. d. Revise the plat and landscape plans to include the dimensions of the pathways. e. Depict landscaping along all pathways per the standards in UDC 11-3B-12C. A 5' wide landscape strip is required on both sides of the pathway planted with a mix of trees, shrubs, lawn and/or other vegetative ground cover. 4. Comply with all ACHD's staff report conditions of approval. 5. Use a shared access point between the Costco Fuel Station and Lot 4,Block 1 off E. Tower Lane as depicted on the CZC for Costco A-2025-0078. 6. The subject properties shall be subdivided and phase two(2) of the Apex Zenith project shall be approved prior to the issuance of any building permits within the subdivision. 7. Provide a detailed maintenance agreement for the private streets and how the Costco property will work with the subdivision for maintenance of those roads with the Final Plat application. 8. Each lot within the subdivision shall submit a certificate of zoning compliance and design review application prior to submittal of a building permit. 9. Depict bike racks and pedestrian connections on the plans submitted with the future CZC and Design Review application in accordance with UDC 11-3C-5C. 10. Comply with all of the private street standards listed in UDC 11-317. 11. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. 12. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1) obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings; or 2)obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC I I- 6 B-7. 13. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions B. Meridian Public Works s I11SumcetoSebyef &evmr main i&Wly-been amwtrurwd.fKwew,oconHi5requirrv' SeNW&L thmah Dwom*ffwntl t+lhor wour t*Nsrlh w We Ent. s 5ewrefshed IS11rna1Led pffoom See Bpp1K.MDn 5egw FRLA'i 41r11HF Qq rliirng lwanw prdjMdCerei%WTf vas with VM Master KwIFiKI10 PWn • See PLPW.t Vbwk€34F cilic condil imi water a 1laxanee ld water %Walrr main Kmparllq been corntracted,hewdever Iaop,ng m required $*rpm Uwa%h Development€epther Fhroudh the Noflh of the Fast. e Eallmmud p ood See applrtatibn Water ERU's • Mlrgwcwl" Nano i Pe0jett COm+Stlrr1 YP.'F snlh water Uatur w�L QslCanwrd please weCondolons NON-I'LAT CONDITION$ F1 MAc WnRK'IMMOT-W1T She gperifr C'oed beck id ApproraA I PTlrwl xAl naglunr k Mng of dw%aWr Minn.This can ath4Y come Rom Hre cast or a svwmd cnr r ciim Lcr Lake 1larrl Rd harlfl oF1k kW 2_ 12'main shavld Fun pu Akl to 5 Mkwidim Rd dwoLkA Me dev6opmml to men to and Ihn>w1g11 erquimmmLi The Ulky wil spCk OPODAMlli4`s to pros ide siubb or ai ka►i gmUrsCLLIs Lo HCridiw Road w elbw Aropmics west afMtewidim Rd to dewlap. ]. 12'Muln A€u lrquind a1mg Lhe i i!mi k wdakce rorm SSrridias Rd lo the Eust 4_ PxAidc loamd-rroath Wartrard SmermaLiiksw Lk g&wdh 2W Lam when rt evww S. $uPencrr Lo sorry irtlwir L.a xrlL u 11a.Lru sell is kicelcd m Lhc tiro it Maki 6c ebarl&L L1 per regralawiN nxloiumentr aed prwf ofahandenromi rimm art pnuiidcd w thLtCb.%. l'Li1w%:A a IIL acid W 15%lrnisid%ti4 AN RYIC%. 6_ IP a Wd I is Ine wd ad Lbw siLt it om be akmdwtd p.r reFdawry+rog6rcm m and pmofor abmWL)ihnhm4 1nwc1 hK pro%Ld6A 14 Ow City 1. Friwary nn.Lrwcr sumcus lug thimoO infiliinmm IreLLK6eiL City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions 21 Iran 46 w Ewmoiui fir mLr m.l)*mL IZ[rrdk and Nmff nentcas Ewc am dw dd axramd up m-Lhe cad Of aLsi&hkd=UVLso L'1 mCLJ and 1d bLxU1Ld iL 5 `lu Prt1MOens stfUcluL +(#M4,bigilrL.blliidlhp,Cptpnrn.trallh I0reptaLtk WAIN.reuaea iofilumden ftnK 3Ci-light pants,ew.)la be baih vrilhnL the wi lin casment. CJracnmtCamdiii mso(Apprevml I AppiLCLvLI shalkCGainibLfow woUt and LL-wc1 ilLaim&iacjmO wuLme with 1hr puW1c Wratks Aet)4'1id1a1L t,LLV COLIg k%K'L'k LILc 300Lrrl AdI br Jm4—islhkr L—Ladl s4fset am1 whiff rdniit Lfi iirL IhhavL[hlhlsL LlkscilOpYllrm[ Applieml tL1ap hrtliLoiNl2 Gnn a rcimbvnf�.ytLrrl[ 3grtaCml4;L WK Lnfr WFM1 LUV.,mkxiOM Col per wa'4 h 64F 1 Tkr WOPLML 41411 praridc L:,LMmL ML,l far ail(ftWtc*uo-1L*rt nanny ommidrof public 6Rbi4.F wuv rLn�L1��pl�#Sr sem 1¢�`!.aad hYdrmrs}, �L'P+C'r��Ce1PP44's4 Vann depe�ra�4�P:w� dgah.wumul4L 24)B dnp rrf urn a W n gmKrmol.NL25 IL 4 up n mwmp&L obd 2{•311 11 a 43 0 cwk�wflL kslswe no p.'rnrma.t mRidures 111sn,bu lL .Wid ndr,qrporks.hash fe4optu3e moll,,F L1 s,imriw mlon vm d",11ghi poks,rk.l wk khah'wiewiu me kiubLy vasemc.L ialSIh11 in ewculcd a mrmemran nhe FJIm nmileble from PuNk wadsL alegnl desenpdonpncpwad b4 am ta14ILb L1 OWLI It1of¢L11,0elb[I.d11d Skis eyat,wbjp.mLmt Inckk&dw apr:ur Lhc V*KihciL Immked E XHUMT A r and an itl 2-1v 11"map wish bcum4s iLrW&%wcm Lrnmrked EXHIBIT B F F31t t'4 L-pw.11dlh exlLrhkh FILUM hC LC'✓ied,sigVill dod doled by i PhDSMiouai I�}ILLfY"Dt.W Nor RECORD. a. Me L'LL}of MrrLLL1a■tugimac.Ihu P"Nwt&11 LLngmam sxsLCHEL br sahap6rd by a ycu.rouod liLlif'r Oftlr2Ler ll;ILC I L-30fi3 T1Lt applleanL should be ttqulrod[p u&c m'CkLSI1ap surfue ar wall wo1Ct tut the pmmuh•UnLem. 11.L Lmfa4e im w¢M wswt4 is WA y.ailahlu,a slagrpwat eamYCcdca DG dirt culrnar4*aLm oymem WMI I lie req i►ad If a trmµlc-palm goivrw'a rob i9 sallila%l- Lhg dn'eiopl6r+Lz11 Ire zuKpmgLLLit fur Ihu pay mL9r of azzoalm4rrs fur thu raQLlomL aram p sm w ptrht in rrrrin•ihp deticlep"rrl7 plLtn appin,•al S krry 7kR1dwcb ibal arc Jkwecd w rerontn*n1J be s*co 6044-ALuWffl Mill pcls-11AC faassagnM=L af,mrl mddrrvLm j b hC in wL"p4wgwP x Pih MCC-. ifil. All amVmwn d1L1r hc&cffn*.h9ff ls.or drains.ess1usrveoFrLaw-n1 warerwms.3rkiergectin - rnm"of la4L APiecm daj o&Lwp4m&Io Lhe alri bi;in,suhdl rkaled"I k addrewg4 ppr VDC I I-3A-6, In pwr omngsash;ark.d3c mW1iurti shO c—plt with IdabiC+#42-5M Irnd try ahcr gO1C.1wu law at rrerrlali m �- Atkywdls[hai%ill nor c4xiiinwio Oar uwd must be proper, I. _d m*arding LeMeM WdP CaeYhxLman Mmida&RuL%aLbni un4hLd by Ibr Laabal❑<:, .� ..t bL'aLLr ResosuteL TUC Pi:%-loptr'3 ErtgiiLm-shall pro+'ILL afLff=cnr>tddFniinr xl •:reach aM crasUng atillsin Ike devdlopdnLuL umd 1f L huw tluey wLll a kimiLL W be used.41 Je eouald of Lheir R. Au}"i inig 9cflfJCitiYL1LS2&wif61rLlha pwfta sh-Al be rkwovei2:1-.::,kn ILL!pu['1h lhdamance S.NLKm 41,14 wd 9 41 k ConLia fkowal UANirr JlmhlF 5�w iban&—miah1 iKiordums aw my4w Likfnf i"I.}7a,i21 r 4 ALI napn...arnraLM idaud w pdtalr IA.wifrl.'aLd 1wall1l LItall lk L'LnLrpIvwd pf,rrio 17crL wio aftke SMKPPres In aLpplw=i Lnalrhe h p+ .A gultcd w Iniiblit 1asU£4Pkfpwfii TJLwi trrlrw-and£ohnlr riiimi insMLim kcs-as drR rminc'd&.ring,LILe glare Jtwi"proorss.prior as ihr i%ume of a plan v9tm•ol klecr 11.Ti shall be drc rrspw abiAilp ofilm sWicmi to rnner An all do elopmcmi teaawts oomo9 will 1hC&M9riCM;1 wiklLrhapI?tliI?eL Acl rrld Ow r#it HouLiup Au 12.Applioml sllallbe rrspousibl4 FJrapplicarion Ed compliance uadl m.w Seuionaly}krmwinµ thnl Tway be rcimbW by Lbo Amv Carp afFrLp.ails 13.♦7LNCIOPU AEI oLxxiinsLcrusJhox kicaLou-A ah LhL Mc dim PloaOffite. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions 14 rommaidw k.u KWAM "I Ix,I,MPIled 14,INC h'1L4teltrrrl 111riwwls U}-I rllvrsl Rid ilk bIL+L41111Lr pads rmocysing�o wn&-d baLL611,a b k lIILUrmi[mould al:,Lap d 11 mu real. I 71Le 71Lw Llrrcl -Vl minmrurn pi`3-f 1#,os4,h��h,yfICSI r#��hllahaL# glgmldw•b�r rl�t,•aL,nn Th,g Li W MIwTe ALHI,ha bMhIHA r dVffl Wh Ot Illy arRM•j%un ul fIl,Ihm IF ae Icarl 1-{im1 alnrc 16 The 4Wmanw dusLym cnprnaer th;dl be rcHWrm Ou fur hTwpa l"of all in-Ratm and in dMMftp f=kI il}-A Ord Ihr.III .' u d0 Yal,7 1 1 lLM1L'r 111r 7laltsLl,ruwl ad W'1,rri uk,u L1„vlcl or AC HD.The deciFm enp:-I. -rr,•.'Ae rCmificwo„d1a1 4fic Nnkiiirs fines brrn Ins l led m IC w 54IIf1 Ihr ippu". I r 114ph cc17Lfle,moll x41 hr n'yolr><d beLm a wu rik:a;[ ofoceupaa'wiijRiwdfoxan4 :L4 dinteplojrrr 17.AL rJlc cvLaapinwxs of Lf c pwy x�,Isr aNpl ult shaCl L,r rLrpt,us,Nr Iu„Lhro1e rrcorlE Lk1w.n_s Ncr fhe fiiv ofMcridiop Ai*CAD mnndxdF. T tL 4 rrPwd draw'irv%-1 he reccr,ed Fnd On—cd plisse Lo the i:m6w c of a am18=lao of Lxcupan%!y fix an}urmiul n w,LLu dre pru;n L IR A baker I,I j/r. fweei I,gIII p1w re ilLL[Crrl®Lt a1C LI%I[le In iC L'IrII�fr-5 it I I))[frnppr4'�rlYl Ib]r1Y fa}r ohs Cl f..111 114�14 G6� o11h1r.Irwtard{L:unlvr4+wLa111611r uuwnLl+ridi;rnci�'rrlY�l+v!'IIr_�u14�u!�.w.'.1�1��F.� I Y. 111ke CLLy mr M e"iam mywres Thal.Lh,,ov, suit W AL(rLy a ku"m 111r arok,m Of 129%04 the isrlal L'uLS f)1 211 gIKArnPkW x vl,+'IIIa7 110 MIMC ffin irthlClluIN prwr in fmal pfd si L'iLalkim TlmLi sumly Yno he 5rn Ged by a I,Lsr 11L'Lm Lcm EsLImy4 pemvil rd kry Ow a*r Ltr io Ibt C',L} Mw sdwit Lsan bLL pLwALrd in At Ak m of m IHn ocuW lour e1'enadla.L:anb d4pop1 or band APPbcan,must FN m appllcmwm for sLucu.wtuch can be dpurd on the Cotrr1II IIm14 1ye'4eIoprfwm 1h'paviruces w-dm11P Plum Comm CMJ Do4xioprnenL SCR ict br mare h&WM n 41l,o� M AK7•7v 11 211 11Lr CRY OfN1r1411 UN[rymrrs LhdL Llrc U'AWf pdeL rm Lhlt Ckv it*Nii ILv s"I.v IN 11W.11L,&MI.of .M*of Ibe bDW GYr[Ir1rumion ilYm fM i11{4Ynp''d7Cd 4€WLY-wafer and wmt infu5inlrlurr for durLlwa Of vwu mars ll'n�€uttep a,li be,cri l imLl b3 t ILnc malt Bose csLlroa[e�I( k-1dza by at th uw w Io die Cila.The war'rry vm br wmird b Aw foem axi iuce canlc Iraer Pr eWic.;ash 41 L'[001+A bwd.Appbc ml.llkueI rl]r ad ajlpd LiaLkM Poe YLNIrlf,utuCb tialL N 6D=d Um IGL! C'"lnlllnIj4 rksalupnLClLI Dewme-is web c PleaLe carxars 1 and fk,43or ent kwica rm niu In1fmn La =ki147- 5f1- City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions C. Meridian Park's Department �ENDI�Ip- I'akrL,s and Reffraliun kewiewer. ICam W@rren.1 Pathways Project Manager Planner Assigned: Ulck Napoll Project Name: Apex-Zenith Rle N +n25.0041—PP Gate: 9-1.2025 The foilowirlg will be required for development of the proposed project; CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-PATHWAYS 1. The project developer snail design and construct multi-use pathways conslstent wlth the location and specifications set forth in the Merldian Pathways Master Plan Map and Master Pathways Plan aorument Chapter 31, Any proposed adjustme-nts to pathway allgnment shall be coordinated through the Pathways Project Manager- P. Prior tofinaIplatapprowaI the applirantshalI dedicate a public acoesseasement for 2{Y wide detachedrnwdtE use pathways (cona-eW sidlewalksj along E. Lake Hazel Rd., S. Meridian Rd, and the raid-mile callecWf roadway and roundabout at the east edge cf the project. Eawments shall be a minimum of 14'wide(IOF pathway+2'shoulder eachside)- Easement need only be dedicated formulti-use pathwaystNltIw { . 11? Lhe public ROW. Use standard Cry template far pubJic access eaTerrwnr. Subrrdir aW easerrnents online through CYNs Ws Access r'orkd- 3, Construct multi-use pathways per paving section based on existing site conditions as recommended by project rfwil engineer in accord with UDC 113A4 and 11-313-12. Prior to firkal approval the applicant's engreer shall provide written documentation stamped plans depicting recommended paving section)that the pathway segment was constructed per the recommended specifications. 4. The awruer(or represantative assoclationj of the property affected by each pubrlc access easement 54WI have an ongoing obllgatian to maintaln the mutt,-use pathway- s. Project deveoper shall be responsible for obtaining license agreement and ether pemii5sipn(0 as required for constructing within or across irrigation district easements. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions D. Boise Project Board of Control(Irrigation District) RICHARD WRGrDf ID OPERhTN4 AGEWY RE WR rwr"ncrrhEacanc Bom PROJECT BOARD OF CONTROL. ACRES FCA C WI GAM SHEiRROH V CA vnhLhNk Cx--FF K�Ap f0%EPLYEC49EU13 PECL WATIC"PR=LiCT4 ROaERT 0.CARTER 2405O ERUHD ROAD VW L_l LL4w en IWLUNRWI71" +i++IP7�,Wrre4WrC�-r'r�IS7 118r3E KIMA O�TfIC7 THOMAS Ftff"AUR eZtm tirkrMr{� Aw5rANT PR{l4{.T kVhNrJR NEW YQW=T"G1 9153 Mope VINME1 APR1eL 43ARONER YL±M-rARY-1 HhA9-c LH MI%"SUE CHASE rEL 1�1 7Y 7 wr MIDFh4T$EZAF-AR7• /-, rAx.tii WI614 MI lrrAgi1Rr9 21 OctobCr 202S City Clerk's Office LL V UL LL IIrJLL 33 G Broadway Avenue Meridian ID, 33642 RE. Apex 74rlla, PP H-2M-0441 � �� E Lake Haul and South Meridian Rd, Meridian Boise-Kura Irrigation District BK-146 OCT 2 � 20 Rawson Canal 259+-90 Sec_{16,T2M,RIE,BM. CITY OF fq C.ITYCLERKS OFFICE Nick Napoli: There m-c no Boise Project or 8-Qise-Kui1a Irrigation District facilities located on tho iflw,vc- mentioned property,however it does in fact pcfssess a Valid woker tight. Per Iduho Statutes,TiOe 42,lxal hrigatior draknag.0 Oiwhcs that crom this pmperty,t3}servi-nciWlb 3is pnppertio-% muss remain unobstructed and protected by an appropriabo Ca Mint by the Ignd—Ter, developer and Landaxvnerfdeveloper must do their due diligence to contact all ownrim of neighboruLg properties on this matter Storm D-ainape and)ar Street Runoff must be retained on site. NO DISCHARGE into the iivc inigation systeai�VaoitWd- Whereas this properiy lir'.s wj1hin ehe BoETa-Kuna frrigaprun District it is impvrtaul tharf rerweserrlafiver of1hFs denLiopnwnt conrewf their({..- Us s2002 alas ible to discuss the aang re .system n-i+nLo atw casflydesp t wrrrk_ If a plfcable, the irrigaflon sysfe�a gilt ravelo_. &YAAL Wee&cspLri�Jcgfiom as sep by flag Dk"r�i'p I i'roJ�cp. ritferr Go ioh from Cite 601se-Kyna Innt arfion District andihe C'ift+ofMer�diurr is 1vq.gr ax in who wiii awn and vnerale the irr[g(Oon.t mlem. If the disfrief is 1rr epos and raje ibis wessltri ed 6Mtffj2dPn systenz. Boise Preiecf x2rdd C'onfraf will j aprire a sit ofiglans be serpr po.Jf►# Woney,CM Survell C'oltsrdmorts- fr&- at I��U Waco-tower.4rreer,Meridian,7rfalro 836 -913 fir k4 gvieru,Cr)rr:orrvni.v aml rrppry 'Phis development is subjact to idaho Code 31-3805,in accordance,this office ks requesting a Ml- siza hard copy of the Irrigation and drai nagc plans. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions E. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) Miranda Gold,Rrosidcnl IC9rxt Galdkharpa�amrrroporwr AF ACHDDaw WKinriev.[Gmrt 50-r o Artricia Nil=rk C0PHmikbkWY61 September 22,2025 To: Amanda McNutt,via email Brighton Corporation 2929 W Navlgalor Drive, Sulte 400 McMdiian, ID 83642 Subject: MPP25-0023! H-2025.0041 Southeast Comer of Lake Hazel Road and Meridian Road Apex Zenith Phase 1 This is a staff level approval via preliminary plat for Apex Zenith Phase 1. On August 25,2025,the Ada County Highway District reviewed and approved this site as part of MER28.00801A-2025-0078 Oostco al Meridian for a new warehwse, fuel facility, and distribution center an 23.6-acres. The site-spe&k cpnditionr.of appnpwal Aw apply to MPP25-0023lH-2025--0041 Apex Zenith Phase 1 for the devel€pmenl of 7 cornrnercial lets. The applicant will be required to pay all appliDable platting and review fees prior to fiinal approval If you have any questions, please conlact me at{208)387-6391_ Sincerely, KarsLeigh Troyer Planner Development Services cc: City of fulerldlan(Nick Napoli),via emall City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions F. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) Charlene Way From: Kendra Conder<Kendra.Conder@itdJdaho.gov-, Sent; Monday,October 2a, 2025 8.59 AM To: Clerks Comment Subject: Apex Zenith PP H-2025-0041 External Sender-Please use caution with links or attachments. Good morning, ITD has reviewed the application transmittal for H-2025-0041 and does not have any comments.The Department is workingwith the applicantto finalize a STAR agreement,which will facilitate transportation improvements for thissite. Thankyou, Kendra Conder District 3 1 Development Services Coordinator Idaho Transportation Department Office:208-334-8377 Colt:208.972-3190 V. FINDINGS A. Preliminary Plat and Short Plat(UDC-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and will be consistent with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the above-noted conditions. The commission finds the proposed plat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan due to no change in the existing zoning and providing pedestrian connection through the commercial subdivision. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services are currently being extended and will be available to serve the site and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's CIP. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. B. Private Streets In consideration of the private street application the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article; The Commission finds the design of the private street meets the requirements listed in Article A of the private street code. 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance,or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity; The Commission finds the proposed private streets will not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the Regional Transportation Plan; and The proposed access points to arterial roadways were previously approved by City Council with the Apex Zenith application (H-2024-0052). Due to the previous approval, the Commission finds the private streets do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and the Regional Transportation Plan. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or a gated development community,promotes infill, or is a planned unit development. Not applicable. The proposed development is not residential. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat with the conditions listed above in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on November 20t'', 2025. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject preliminary_plat requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Amanda McNutt b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Amanda McNutt d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. None 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action a. The Commission discussed the proposed subdivision and the timing with the larger Apex Zenith Project.However,there were no concerns with the proposal and the Commission recommended approval of the application. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)for City Council: a. None C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial Legend �a Project Location m ;,';Area of Impact ,o OAnalysis -/ I iAal f , gp IC' ....: •,.yam ., �` . 2. Zoning Map Legend Project Location Area of Impact _ R1 r ® Analysis R-4 TN-R R-2 R's r RUT ' R-4 R-2#R-•12- = R-8 i R-15 C-C r R;6 r RR C-G H RUT R-4 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 3. Future Land Use Legend Project Location �� Area of Impact O Analysis ®® Medium Density Resid n ial High— Density Residential MU-RG 1 - 1 MU-C 1 1 ,Med-High Density Residential Low Density Residential 4. Planned Development Map Legend I� Project Location0 Area of Impact . m City Limits Planned Parcels OAnalysis 1 Ed Y[ - Nil I �n �F 1 - ' ® -17 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 l l 1 t ]1] 1 1 � I hL { 1 I y 1 I , 1 1 I ---------- City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits B. Subject Site Photos Al — .. .� .... -: r.1:art\ - '•`.�'rrr. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL 51406223020 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY overall Score: 19 16th Percentile Description r i Location In City Limits GREEN Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 50Dff,from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 1 DO yr floodp'e� ' _ _ °_ - GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Not enough data to report average rc-_r=r__ - 'r v RED Pathways Within 1/4 mile of future pathways -E--o'N Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route RED J Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultirnate configuration(#of lanes in master streets YELLOW plan) > existing (#of lanes) &road IS in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity Not within 1 mile walking School Drivability Not within 2 miles driving of existing or future school RED Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Landscape Plan (date: 8/27/2025) ZENrTH SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PUTT MERIDVW,IDAHO AI li:RYY^ I _ 7- �ifiWYrrr Pr r� r� ® J SO r w _ OEM m LANDSCAPE COVER R� E .,-��.e IEHRH 5l1B[NNSIOM Y,,,y` MERI[Wy IB wPN10_- ----.-- —`�'- ip i yE�� m._ MIN - =e •xv_•-,��=.tea:s.e:sra � .I:•. •�-�:��r�x Via. 1pL' i '>�iYS'SLSSLdS'yi6'�lrwr I IERRH SIIBENNSIOR . Ion - � IP120 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits I M-Eg--- VZO ----- ' I p _= I� ZENITH WBENYISgM y y� -I MEWEU ID 11V1�5CRPE PU4N IPLiO City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Preliminary Plat(date: 9/18/2025) ZENITH SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF tOTA OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,RANGE 1 EAST,(WISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF ME RIOIAN, ADA COUNTY,IDAHO I� 4L ----- II I I I I ' I I -- I I, _----- I iEHfRl5�9LIY➢SIDM �- g MElWIAH,ID lit m MATCH LINE SEE BELOW RIGHTr �S ------ - J;_.—z.. ---—-------- [I - + f i I rImamo ;I I o MATCH LINE- SEE ABOVE LEFT C P�/V4�J�S.'�7i1Lf�'i@,7R�.�,.�-• ZEHfR15�901V610H M 1� EPIDIfW.10 ■L.■z � PP7A g City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Conceptual Building Elevations iw A 1 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Street Section Exhibit s - o 2 0 N w Y mewK C m'1x-u se'p.rec C Y R O r n,ennr..ma.ery om.cx[,IYI rt re wbs n vr-r.w wsm s� � mP•�'oaf sw w r r.n rrt-nw xw,es wr.cro wwres PRIVATE STREET SECTION A S. MOMENTUM LN., E.TOWER LN. SCALP NM km g EXLO F 9 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation APEX ZENITH Preliminary Plat Meridian City Council December 16, 2025 �� 41 - BRIGHTON Apex Zenith & The Pinnacle Community .. Farr i ,9hton coK`� BRIGHT < . �tCONCEPTUAL,SUBJECTTO CHANGE 7 ! DIEVIELOPMENT +t F FUTURE FIRE FUIUKF DEVELOPMENT a I�Illllllla�lllllll��.-.•�� ' t'�r ' '�` � � ��}IIIINIII�IIIII_I_III�„�� =�' ® �„_ -• '' Pheno.men�alralm • � • � ninm mmm� annrr rmim r.� : p1114,,111 H Z-E•N•IT� r . DEVELOPMENT �� 11111111 � ias � � �� '_'w�111��1,�111� �r11A11111'�IMIII'Ii11 49,11- BRIGHTON Apex Zenith Progress Apex Zenith so far. . . • Rezone - DONE • Development Agreement - DONE • Property Boundary Adjustment - DONE • Roadway and Utility Construction Plans — DONE • Roadway Construction — IN PROGRESS • STAR Agreement ( For Highway 69 Improvements) — IN PLACE • Design Guidelines — IN PROGRESS 4 -;- BRIGHTON Pinnacle So Far. . . 0 0 ! � r • • . • 0 doh 1 r I ..--- 98i JCS • • . • . • ghton car^ . . \ 1� �IIIZ,IAIII_ . _ "' Illtlllllrlllllll � .y M ;� . Milk! • • . ' • vlllllllh lll�ll =5 ME iA•',, y '�, �. _- -- `Illltllll lllllllll`_ __ — 1 a s. i1111VI.M��'f�ll�l��e.�ww-wi�.�77.1�1��', , • • . • . ntul Affill 4all milli =,arllll ' gill rig kv: r- _ = = gill w n �11== =all • ,All A "�p,lillllil � � �� ttl ttl on i � • • • . • -;- BRIGHTON Preliminary Plat E Lake Hazel Rd oil I� i M L �M one I -:- BRIGHTON Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use .��it 11111 , �•{ � � of Ii1111; � • Meclinm nsity -- iZesidentfal = u�jl�i lii �Ylediu will Sd sity �° esiden 1 P� lllllul • �� Iii0L Densifti M nsi NIC-RG dential Re'icleiilial �� w r � ull lul: + � - � 14Ied-High - Illlil 11 In ��' �' 1 �. r i11111 Illll �+ + Rn Residential ___ _ r. I +} •y .+ � -- �_. ,. N1f11111Aiif f351i51i15if - �f7f!l111f�11�• IResidentia Loin Density Residential -:- BRIGHTON Current Zoning Ri ■�� ¢Y�` —;Ilmurlr_ Hr R-g � ■om 1 1 11 III � - _ • 11 111 111 I Ili as-q �, �Irlrrll�� ■ -i I� II - -II_ Illrllllllll � � ♦ ■ �` E, = II II III 1111 _�a O �� I 1 RS R-l5 C-G ` mnW n Il d = 'r'I ` 1 1 � III NIXON RI'I �� +: r I�il 11 llllll R R-1` �Ir 1 11 iiii �illl - 1 11� R-� H� i i Site Access Roadways ' �W.:ANE HAEFE RA4W o E Lake Hazel . • of Green - Private Streets + 5' Detached Sidewalks f Estimated completion July 2026 . " FiRl7AL*-Ti5[PEE 'n Blue : Public Street + 10' Detached Pathway Estimated completion July 2026 =.vIRESi RfET Orange - Public Streets + Sidewalks and Pathways Estimated completion August 2026ILL — m Signal Locations Estimated completion October 2026 f.ARIST(I(R/1 GRNE 9 Changesto Conditions - - - - - -- - - - �_ - -- - - -- - - - - - - # JL - _ - - - - . We request that the following - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - E, LAKEHAZELitp. - � - - condition be removed : ----��-- =� ---- - - - - - - -- - - - slid ..;. Ikl IV.A.5 : Use a shared access point between the Costco FuelLU Station and Lot 4, Block 1 off E. Tower Lane as depicted on the CZC for Costco A-2025-0078ell 4 .I F Y Accessing lot 4 from a shared i access with the Fuel Station will ;.._ create flow issues that have the - ti S �� ' , E.7�WER�N. potential to impede traffic on Tower Lane. 10 BRIGHTON Conditions of Approval We concur with the staff and Commission ' s recommendation of approval and respectfully request approval from City Council for Zenith PrePlat and removal of Condition IV. A . 5 Thank you ! Discussion W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Hill's Century Farm Townhomes (H-2024-0072) by Brighton Corporation, generally located at the corner of S. Tavistock Ave. and E. Hill Park Street with the inclusion of the following parcels: R3636090060, R3636090040, R363080240, S1133212576and R3636080110. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0072 A. Request: Rezone of 5.45 acres of land from the C-N zoning district to the R-15 zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 70 homes and 18 common lots spanning across 9.126 acres. C. Request: Development Agreement Modification to supersede the existing development agreement. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: December 16, 2025 ITEM # 24 PROJECT NAME: Hill's Century Farm Townhomes (H-2024-0072) by Brighton Corporation I wish to testify Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing (mark X (Please Print) HOA. if yes) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--, DEPARTMENT REPORT o a H o HEARING 12/16/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location ,. Area of Impact TO: Mayor& City Council W= City Limits FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org r7 APPLICANT: Eli Benski SUBJECT: H-2024-0072 � f Hill's Century Farms Townhomes g, LOCATION: Generally located at the corner of S. Tavistock Avenue and E. Hill Park Street ' with the inclusion of the following parcels: R3636090060,R3636090040, Alp � R3636080240, S1133212576, R3636080110. 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The applicant requests a rezone of 5.45 acres from the C-N zone to the R-15 zone, a preliminary plat consisting of 70 homes and 18 common lots spanning across 9.1 acres, and a new development agreement to supersede the existing development agreement. B. Issues/Waivers - The subject development will be served by Hillsdale Elementary School,Lake Hazel Middle School,and Mountain View High School. Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High are both over capacity. C. Recommendation Staff: Approval with a new DA and conditions. Commission: Approval as presented in the staff report. D. Decision Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial and Residential - Existing Zoning C-N and R-15 VII.A.2 II. Proposed Zoning R-15 Adopted FLUM Designation MU-N VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation MU-N Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 8/27/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 10/22/2024 Site posting date 12/3/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access S.Tavistock Avenue and Hill Park Street;Local Streets - • Traffic Level of Service Amity Road:Better than"E" - ITD Comments Received No Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns Yes; See PW's Site Specific Conditions. J Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at site r • Impacts or Concerns no School District(s) West Ada School District IV.D • Capacity of Schools Hillsdale Elementary School(Architectural/Program):700 - /675 Lake Hazel Middle School: 1000 Mountain View High School:2175 • Number of Students Enrolled Hillsdale Elementary School:768 - Lake Hazel Middle School:987 Mountain View High School:2479 Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received or see the public record. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure l: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:R3636080240 Date Retrieved:2025/1/27 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infiii Indicator: 1,692 508 Surrounding Area 35% ►vot city 4D 49 ® City Limits 2,104 941.3 ■ Not City Household Change Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:19.5°I° Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family Multi-family is 0% 2%% is ® Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed I I Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 0.5 1 ■ Single-family ® Multi-family Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics 0 Amity Road Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes Existing Level . Comments a Programmed IFYP © Programmed CIP E City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 3: Service Impact Summary impactService ■ ■ Ready Marginal Caution .�`oo �a 0�4 Qa City of Meridian Department Report II. Community Metrics STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject properties are designated as Mixed-Use Neighborhood(MU-N)on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). ui. The MU-N designation is intended to allocate areas where neighborhood serving uses and dwellings seamlessly integrate into the urban fabric. The intent is to avoid predominantly single- use developments by incorporating a variety of uses. The applicant requests to rezone 5.45 acres of land from C-N to R-15, a preliminary plat for 70 building lots and 18 common lots, and a development agreement modification. The applicant's narrative states that by rezoning the property to R-15,the FLUM designation will not be impacted as residential uses are allowed in the MU-N designation. The applicant also states that the proposed single-family attached units will complement nearby commercial and civic uses, including medical offices,retail, storage facilities,Hillsdale Elementary School,the YMCA,and Hillsdale Park. The project falls within the MU-N designation's intended mix of 30%to 60%residential uses. This broader MU-N designation was established through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPAM)in 2015, allowing for a diverse mix of uses. The existing C-N zoning was originally part of a concept plan that envisioned three(3) commercial pad sites on the north side of the property, and a seventy-six(76)unit assisted living facility on the east side. While the R-15 portion was envisioned to be independent living. The applicant cites changing market demand as the basis for the requested rezoning and land use amendment. While staff is generally supportive of the overall concept plan,there are concerns regarding the continued reduction of commercial pad sites in south Meridian,where neighborhood-serving commercial opportunities are already limited. It should also be noted that much of the property proposed for rezoning was previously approved for an assisted living facility,a residential use within a commercial zone. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should carefully consider whether rezoning the commercial pad sites is appropriate. In addition,according to the student generation rates,the development will create forty- three(43) school aged children. Currently,the three schools that will service this area are Hillsdale Elementary School,Lake Hazel Middle School,and Mountain View High School. Both Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High are over capacity for the 24-25' enrollment. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. The immediate area consists primarily of single-family detached homes. By introducing single- family attached homes,the applicant is helping diversify the housing type in this area of south Meridian. It is also important to note that the subject properties were contemplated as primarily independent senior living and assisted living which are residential uses allowed in commercial zones. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 G states development should avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City. The applicant is proposing the addition of four(4) single family detached homes and sixty-six (66) single family-attached homes which will diversify the housing types in the immediate area. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.06.02D encourages a diversity of housing, recreation, and mobility options to attract and sustain the local workforce. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis With the location of the proposed subdivision,the applicant is providing a mix of housing types in the area that is in close proximity to neighborhood serving uses, a regional park,the YMCA, and Hillsdale Elementary School. This will allow for opportunities to live,work,and play in the general vicinity. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.02.02C: Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development. This project is considered infill as it is one of the last pad sites to redevelop in the Hill Century Farm Development. Completing the subdivision will allow for better connectivity in the area for both pedestrians and vehicles. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History CPAM-15-001,AZ-15-004,RZ-15-007,MDA-15-007,PBA-15-012,FP- 15-023,FP-15-005,H-2019-0134,A-2019-0225. Phasing Plan 1 Phase Residential Units 66 Attached Single-Family Homes and 4 Single-Family Detached Homes Open Space 1.76 acres or 19.3% Amenities Picnic Shelter,Pathway Extension Acreage 9.1 acres Lots 70 Buildable and 18 Common Density Gross: 7.8 du/ac;Net: 14.9 du/ac B. History In 2015 the subject sites were included in a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment,Annexation, and Rezone. The CPAM changed the FLUM designation of approximately 87.01 acres of land from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use Neighborhood. Additionally,the applicant requested annexation of 78.62 acres of land with the R-8 and C-N zoning with a rezone of 8.39 acres of land from R-8 to the C-N zoning district. The primary driver behind the change from LDR to MU-N FLUM designation was for the incorporation of neighborhood serving use in close proximity to residential and assisted living. In addition, in 2019 the applicant applied for a modification to the conditional use permit for the assisted living shown in the original concept plan. This changes the location of the assisted living to the interior of the commercial area and within the subject properties proposed to be rezoned. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant seeks to rezone 5.45 acres of land to the R-15 zoning district and create a preliminary plat across the 9.1-acre site to consist of 70 buildable lots. The proposed single family attached and detached homes are intended to provide a mix of housing opportunities within the Mixed-Use Neighborhood designation. The applicant's narrative states the rezone of 5.45 acres to R-15 will continue to be consistent with the 30-60% of residential uses allowed in the MU-N FLUM designation. The calculations provided by the applicant bring the area to 59.2% residential which is compliance with the parameters of the comprehensive plan.Additionally,detached and attached single family homes are a permitted use in the R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. 2. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The applicant is proposing single-family attached homes (66)and single-family detached homes (4),which are listed as a principal permitted use in UDC Table 11-2A-2 for the R-15 zoning district. Any future development shall comply with the dimensional standards for the R-15 district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3G): A minimum of 15% qualified open space is required to be provided in the R-15 district. Based on the eastern 9.1-acre portion of the site proposed to develop at this time, a minimum of 1.37-acres of common open space is required that meets the minimum quality standards in UDC 11-3G-3A.2 and qualified open space standards in UDC 11-3G-3B. A total of 1.76-acres (19.3%)is proposed consisting of linear open space,parkways, and a shared open space greater than 5,000 square feet. In addition,Hillsdale park is directly south across E. Hill Park Street. Staff is recommending a pedestrian connection through Lot 87, Block 1 to provide better connectivity to the commercial to the north. Based on 9.1-acres,a minimum of two(2)points of site amenities are required. The applicant is proposing a picnic area on site that is greater than 5,000 square feet for a total of two(2) points,meeting the UDC requirements. Additionally,the applicant is providing pedestrian connection to Hillsdale Park to the south. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets The proposed development will abut several local streets including E. Hill Park Street and S. Tavistock Avenue.Each of these streets require a ten(10) foot landscape buffer. The proposed landscape plan meets the UDC requirements for the landscape buffer widths. Vegetation coverage will be confirmed with the final plat. In addition,the applicant is proposing five(5)private streets(Woodmurra Lane, Newbridge Lane,Kalinga Lane,Boswell Lane, and Stockenham Lane)which will all have eight(8)foot parkways and sidewalks that are included inside the private street common lot. ii. Tree preservation The applicant submitted a tree mitigation plan proposing the relocation of eleven(11) existing trees and the removal of six(6) existing trees. The applicant shall submit this mitigation plan to the City Arborist before any trees are removed as set forth in UDC I I- 3B-1 OC.5. The arborist will determine if the two(2)trees proposed to be removed that are four(4)caliper inches shall be mitigated for or not. The applicant shall submit a letter from the city arborist with the final plat application confirming the mitigation plan is approved. iii. Storm integration Per UDC 11-313-11,the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural, effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated,well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green stormwater facilities into required landscape areas,where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. iv. Pathway landscaping Pathway landscaping shall comply with the requirements outlined in UDC 11-313-12. The applicant must provide a landscape strip at least five(5) feet wide along both sides of the pathway. To enhance design flexibility,variations in the strip's width are encouraged to allow trees to be planted farther from the pathway,reducing the risk of root damage. However,the landscape strip must maintain a minimum width of two(2)feet to ensure City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis proper pathway maintenance. The strips shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, lawn, and/or other vegetative ground cover. 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required per the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6;the number of parking spaces is based on the number of bedrooms per unit. The applicant shall comply with these standards. Each single-family residence will be evaluated at the time of building permit submittal. ii. Bicycle parking analysis The UDC does not require bicycle parking in single-family attached, detached, and townhomes developments. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): Goal 5.01.02D of the Comprehensive Plan highlights the need for effective building design and landscaping to buffer, screen,beautify,and integrate commercial,multifamily,and parking areas with existing neighborhoods. In response,the developer has submitted a conceptual elevation package. The materials included in the elevations are board and batten, brick,asphalt shingles,metal roofing, stucco, and stone. The single-family attached units require design review approval and are subject to the residential design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. Additionally,the DA requires development to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place consistent with the Comprehensive Plan(see pg. 3-10). 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): No fencing is depicted on the landscape plan. The UDC(11-3A-7A.7)requires the developer to construct fences abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas; if fencing is proposed,it should be depicted on a revised landscape plan along with a detail of the fencing type proposed or alternative compliance may be requested to the standard. 6. Parkways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-17): Per Comp Plan policy 3.07.01C appropriate landscaping,buffers, and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors(setback,vegetation,low walls,berms, etc.) is required. Per the UDC the minimum width of parkways planted with Class II trees shall be eight(8) feet. The width can be measured from the back of curb where there is no likely expansion of the street section within the right-of-way; the parkway width shall exclude the width of the sidewalk. Class II trees are the preferred parkway trees. The applicant is proposing parkways along Woodmurra Lane, Newbridge Lane, Kalinga Lane, Boswell Lane, and Stockenham Lane that appear to be in compliance with this standard. The applicant shall comply with the standards for UDC 11-3A-17 with submittal of the final plat. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Goals 6.01.01H and 6.01.02B of the Comprehensive Plan stress the need to minimize the City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis number of direct access points onto arterial streets. This can be achieved through cross-access agreements, access management, frontage and backage roads,and enhancing connectivity through local and collector streets. Additionally,these goals highlight the importance of incorporating pedestrian access connectors in new developments to link subdivisions and support neighborhood connectivity within a community pathway system. Access to the proposed subdivision is off of S. Tavistock and E. Hill Park Street,both local streets. The applicant has made four(4)connection points to these local streets through three (3)private streets and one(1) alley. The applicant has submitted a private street application to run concurrently with this application to allow for the construction of five(5)private streets. Please see section E4 below for analysis on the private street standards. In addition,the applicant is completing the extension of E. Hill Park Street from S. Tavistock Avenue to S. Hillsdale Avenue, a collector street,which will improve circulation in the area from the existing subdivisions to the east and west. 2. Multiuse Pathways,Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5, Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): Comprehensive Plan policy 4.04.01A ensures that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system. The subject site does not have a multi-use pathway that runs on the property,however,there is an existing ten(10)foot multi-use pathway on the southern boundary that connects to Hillsdale Park. The applicant has proposed an internal pathway/sidewalk system that connects to the 10-foot multi-use pathway on the south and to the properties to the north. In addition, staff is recommending a north-south pedestrian connection through Lot 87, Block 1 to better connect the commercial with the residential. 3. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): Detached sidewalks are proposed adjacent to public and private streets in accord with UDC 11-3A-17. The applicant is proposing sidewalks on both sides of each private street that connect to the existing sidewalk connections in the larger development. 4. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): The applicant is proposing five(5)private streets in the form of Woodmurra Lane, Newbridge Lane,Kalinga Lane,Boswell Lane, and Stockenham Lane with this application. These private streets are depicted on the plat and have an sixty(60) foot and fifty-four(54) foot easements that spans across the full street section including thirty-three(33) and twenty- seven(27) foot street width, eight(8) foot parkways,and five(5)foot sidewalks on both sides. Since this plat is located within the MU-N FLUM designation,it is critical to have connectivity for pedestrians that are integrated with vehicular access points and streets. The applicant has provided five(5)foot sidewalks on both sides of the private streets which will connect with ten(10)foot multi-use pathway along S. Hillsdale Avenue and a five(5)foot sidewalk along S. Tavistock Avenue. In addition,the applicant has provided street crossings to connect with Hillsdale Park to the south of the proposed development. This will help promote the connectivity and walkability that is envisioned in the MU-N principles. Since this is an infill project,the applicant is in compliance with the private street standards and shall comply with ACHD's structural standards for the proposed streets. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 5. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Common driveways Per UDC 11-6C-3D, common driveways shall serve a maximum of four(4) dwelling units. In no case shall more than three(3)dwelling units be located on one(1) side of the driveway. The applicant is not proposing any common drives with this application. ii. Block face UDC 11-6C-3-regulates block lengths for residential subdivisions. Staff has reviewed the submitted plat for conformance with these regulations. The intent of this section of code is to ensure block lengths do not exceed 750 ft, although there is the allowance of an increase in block length to 1,000 feet if a pedestrian connection is provided. In no case shall a block face exceed one thousand two hundred(1,200)feet,unless waived by the City Council. iii. Alley The applicant is proposing alley loaded units. The alleys are twenty(20) feet in width, which meets the requirements listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. However,alleys should design where the entire length is visible from a public street, currently the applicant does not meet this requirement. As a result, staff is recommending the removal of Lot 13,Block 1 and replacing it with a micro path common lot to allow for the full length of the alley to be visible. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): The proposed development has a private gravity irrigation line that runs through the west and southern boundaries of the site. These gravity lines will be piped and encumbered within the ten(10)foot public utility, irrigation and drainage easement. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC I1-3A-15): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be installed to provide irrigation to each lot in the subdivision in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future final plat. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development.All utilities are available to the site. Water main, fire hydrant and water service require a twenty- foot(20)wide easement that extends ten(10)feet past the end of main,hydrant, or water meter.No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments,including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities. City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of rezone of this property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A IV. final plat shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the rezone. The DA shall, at a minimum, incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines rezone is in the best interest of the City: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, common open space/site amenity exhibit, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Graphically depict the three(3) foot wide public utility,drainage, and irrigation easements on the sides of Lots 1-14,Block 1; Lots 17-27,Block 1;Lots 30-41,Block 1; Lots 45-56,Block 1; Lots 59-65,Block 1; Lots 67-76,Block 1;Lots, 80-84,Block 1. b. Graphically depict and add a plat note for the public utility, irrigation, and drainage easement on the front and rear of each lot. c. Add a plat note stating the location and placement of the three(3) foot wide easement for public utilities,irrigation, and drainage on Lots 1-14,Block 1; Lots 17-27,Block 1; Lots 30-41,Block 1; Lots 45-56,Block 1; Lots 59-65,Block 1; Lots 67-76,Block 1; Lots, 80- 84,Block 1. d. Provide a north/south pedestrian connection through the central open space to allow for better pedestrian connectivity between the residential and commercial. e. Remove Lot 13, Block 1 and replace it with a micro path common lot to allow for the full length of the alley to be visible to meet UDC 11-6C-3B.5. f. Add a plat note providing the CCR instrument number for the maintenance agreement for the private streets. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Include mitigation calculations on the plan for existing trees that are proposed to be removed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-IOC.5. The Applicant shall coordinate with the City Arborist(Kyle Yorita Ayorita(kmeridiand0 org)to determine mitigation requirements prior to removal of existing trees from the site. b. Provide an amenity detail with the submittal of the final plat. c. Remove Lot 13,Block 1 and replace it with a micro path common lot to allow for the full length of the alley to be visible to meet UDC 11-6C-3B.5. 4. The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. 5. Comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC I I-6C-3, including but not limited to cul-de-sacs, alleys,driveways,common driveways,easements, blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions 6. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 7. Depicted fencing on a revised landscape plan along with a detail of the fencing type proposed or apply for alternative compliance in accordance with 11-3A-7. 8. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1) obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings; or obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. 9. The final plat shall substantially comply with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C. 10. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-5,UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 11. Comply with all of the private street standards listed in UDC 11-3F. 12. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 13. The Applicant shall have a maximum of two(2)years to obtain City Engineer's signature on a final plat in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 14. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions B. Meridian Public Works PRI-PLAT CONDI IONS ww5lewaW r.:._L,S�ko$C�►'ir 5ewefAYaNaleatOL- S�M�ALo4 �f,11+er�tlyd • [summed Pm" See spplwr uon $wmv FRU's • wRAFbeElimny E 4nti • PMJRLd COnPSterrk Yes wnhvrw mastw PLMfFMj1itvnM Impattrtamruxrnx Soo PuWc 1Mwkx Sit4 Spwcifrc CwWitipmx Warner _ • ¢�xtaLrce ea Waicr Wstrr krsdable aiS�tt 5#ryGL� PrtISLrl�tr� + PAimnedFNOJKt '.Mapp1WA4;n Viz*T ERU'ti • w ted"Irty N4" • FMjL3QCQnSJSterrk Yes wth waker hnsW FUdl kapjcWCarKcnr* Noft- rt N1.14 %VngAirllFPj%WT.MF,.7 $ilr Spmi Fir{'ooditimm at kpprevni I. Eucirwertovcnbifthtrx ism adlaasike.IFaWeLlishmairdeoIhcsiteiimLmhatabwdkmcd Nr atgulmacy Lkgwrgenc-mu,Pad prWirrsbPndonrwLl mull Ue pm%id4d La IN City Unn N Wad for PrcssLrized iniga n. 2, F.uch phaur of ilk,L4-L gUq=um will acj3d to hC W xxrify mimrnkLm frrk ffim prCxLmuv u en 1imuki'm'cad %�NVF �y WPLrr loam rgquiSV 3u4 EaW'roKnL. d. Existirkg w ftW maim dXN 7dL Ivru sa L- m=1 draT it From 3 S Id the ww%of Ibc pLgronLA mam to Ck On to Ok 1-x fuek Ilrr7nh of L•.Kekietp[in Prnx id4 31k OL rr 71Lr%L.Ajo rllJll■ S_ No tt%.Lien 4w IP06Lpolea$*PId Lx%<ihim 9 nfrhe hrdrmfttrvaiL.Tmrlm mFudln Lif ie I&I Xv 01 11kv TAOCRW 14k nUl k Ark%unucsd inner main subs shall Lx aLurdgmed Ft*City of?Amjdi m 573rwieuds 4_ 1'ILxurs no st x[L]L N Wei PUI dWLt9h LrAhratrerL Lhft:l" City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions Gq� Crdid+•+9FAppri.-ml I. Appllewi sfialk cvardlnalt a aler and wwcr man siac and mullag wub ilu Public Wcprks JJCWLrngwt,rind CxmllC lkmrdWd dorm F ar Ca mt!mts for My Mjdpp*W MR"Loro Lo I9D4 idl• ser{xe omesidtof a public FLA[-af--xay- Minimum eovcr&�ustwcr maim kIkk'L fcer.if4v xx "wP of Pe Pr Im KI:16y3Ak!is k{'`n Apm IIrRti&N I IIIaaL Ph4nadq Iifk7d6k1Apl]N med ur c,anfarrnsJn'c'' dc of Cim of P-kddim Pubik Works�'`�Ik"�pamnmly Saandmni Spc ifiuldow, p5'I M%!Fi�F FLY d I%K k IIIC npIFI F#mrt JOL 6e ry.'Fp•Xrrlhla LnM"I MUMOPF r9Fl x'#1er minis L'.r aid I`NvONlIkk&%k4 MkI1I- Appkiewl may bxclligiEle Fora mcimbum¢mmi agnWMi;ML WI mfru6uuCLiav 4vLhmCmb7n]per lad['{'5r6-4 FJ rhr aVplrraart%hall pmuidr cowmen![%)fit oll}•chlic waLrr xowxt ma m mmxidr mf pu6lic Fiµlll of wat imOadv jd1 wnler r,:J{I{`4>od hydrmu,}. Ih�vt. nYmii WWON JIa]I Lt 291-1�4L%lik rrsr A wlnyk ulllpty.nr 3I7.Frr1 wide kw lnv 'Ihc rascmI mu 4IFuI1 rxrl be dDdbi;Lld%it Lbr*I.NA rsihtr dMbmt!ouL+xk Ih'r plat ppinms using Lke City orlltndlan's Hwxdard fbnns.The epalCmgmL drp11 Lt graph ipllly d+'RFcLcd on LhC pill ruF rrfC119111N pUgXv Wl %WIL nn vtizviud al-asmaemtiap ihr form atia`lmble hum PLdk 11L'pkrr a IqW kwnprlom pmparni b}an Idaho I.K47i Cd Priff mipryl[.nil!5Wvcyut-w•hF1'1'I 1mrmL lw[u*the mra mF the r cWOMl I reark,rd 1XfflRrrAI and am RU!'a I I'mapwiihb mriMsmd duLvievs 4rawked!EXHIBIT Bl for r4yww Do&€LMI;i19L Mom XCWdCd•mlg*4 Od4mjS d by a PFvFcuKKLll L.artd SurrsMne DO Nor RECORD. Aid a we so 6te pbL referemeLrlg iris dwixr i. MI esmir ors must be miiin Ftivd.evvw' ed.wrd PPP%xr%I pkwjo k%CIOpocnl PAL rlpprmSa]. i. TtrtCiLy ofMrli m tn:gthnihml pm9wixd irigwwrl s4sltrurs be sapplied br a vex-ircmi ld vowvv kveolei RAW I L*39-61.the npplicaOL ibould hC Flquned Lu uac any rSLUi7re LUFfMv a WOM*aratAht 16e htirhIM SkIAO. If l xU&CL ee WCO ymmeL Is&M a4ad3hle-a%ihFk-pornC wrMrt4tine ar I*e41hnarrjr warm rY wrq OW I he vgwred Ff n—Slv-pnrrd wpr Nki%+vs willmd. Cho do elPp,C a FII he n:kp 7L ibic for the Ii2ymcm Stf MmvOtcnu fLTt Lh L-OItIrI M aft-us p1imr W ppm lu re£tiviq de%elopmvil p w apprrn A S All gFrla#ritmOLIr%*Thar arl'mgrnwd prbe rlrmovmd FhnR he pnatrlm ripoalursnn 4r final pla. h1'1heCih'linprlerr lym s[nxlurrr Ihatare�bwwd lu ratm;un shall bu sables+W etialurPFurl 1t■Id pmprlbl�s"muli-nirimi of ctr i mldrmi ng tin br an om Tkoi-i.rcC XI A I&V 6. All m4pmum dlnhe,.cnnlls.lmwra&or drains.culupveof mwml aamcmi.vs.Irtler;mLing. Itrprdrlp A In%I"ad;wizna and ran[ilIanWrta Lh[Or'i tchd wuhdlrlbcd AbjI hx addrw-LoW pcI UDC I I-'JAB. In performilig Itch+ u&d3c Spl iCML shall emply wi[h kdolao Cote 42-12a17 Uqd tpy q3¢r app Licat l4 Ixr or grpAaLlpn 1 Any udls Thai w ilk WE C6hLinbt Lo bt Used m Lrar he rlk.'i LIIY abandowd aomordtrg w Mahla V4dk Coddlupnd Simldmi1q Rulaw m&I.Ime Lehrvd by Me Idatw LlepaAadenl of Wab r RcKwkc & IIDWR).The W,lopey.Owmcr,ofpmjecr Enrilenl hall pmaedtiswm menl addw ming whpicrRlere rir peti Cxis7Fr5p r1Ll�nl6rdar5CLo(rlacnl,aor{ff rf Lmw-tire}will pommnuRto Lae tlmrd_ar pro:ide ttcond of d eFr Sb0I1doF11YciLI 11 A-LI l�aI L to br abwkit &die plajetr OwLftr eN thb n Flmpromeniai vi;mmwl cnnlart tibc IDWR{iFT1 OL at4 r RuICRI.Im!L'k!S n I Amin%Linwr. Hy&owolog.w:fHi-:K7.�y7�1r9f.FllPoF.any wuk isdLmr In accmnniixxamn an"wiii gwill 16 L-;en if;I vs bclltytd that the will Is leis rhvl I A Ft lkgj.PFWOl`CiVnrlllflt 5WM unh Inn R MI. '-•n lMrill tin the Orly pnat-in arny wuA heinr dmw;*Amummrfxwd the wcA Fmlaw wt a li- II ;A 1'Is IOW R 91114 tnsuli 111 MNIIWrlrl L%Vf k EW cxprnse ra dteammltarom the well 8 11' •..•Idu*I`I,piwcct,ha11 be T{'nwvgd dRFm wnwc jw 0tv(]rdlmnrrce -ISIxL Cenwal Dia[neC I l algh far Ilbmdorllrteml procadur"Ind Y- Sat:.}I_ plax.samuae}Vlhl!rasd vrnterspsrcrn shs13 be aWWd astd aed%314L mod L.., Ihv,Ida touliiiry Mown rligmel mLd ihr Floral PA For ibir Ipb %irion Shrill he,..vl[: .pi-i Lu mpphla6 RK buddift pCImFL9. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions I u.A IL.m nfrtrrd`L,Ir rash MVIX en the INVIP ML 4f I IaN w1111 br trgflWd rN all WN1aMF L:k'd krlciog.LmK6cV iog.ammki&L em,prior to Q*anrr an 9hL!goal*L I 1 ALI imph.L vrnLAP,ialcu%d Ro putt hk_mfdy and heallh shall 1'a CI+nLpleud Twgw 16%o tllmieir vfoF 5-ctprM '%hqr iQQ4 k)W 41 ft CFry km&uWCF.P{,--;r rnaF poa a p'rAy—ue*urpty lar m7h ioillwN mccitt irk ardctiot6 ln{`uy fzvi= "pinuir mrt Lhd Awl pad a,xL fanlL le W)c 1 I-KC1311 12 Appkwi•nalr1e rrqulkJ io p y Nblie Wadi.dere6pmwHl rAw n,It*.dud4uhimci" uLslLLxlion kmk as dkscrrnrard dwirp the plan mview prcaxss.prior io Lhe inum a 4YF u plat app"Id kutr. 13.Ii shall be she mprmwbiliq ofllrc jpplicart tp mirm Ihm all&n cluponcm frnnrccs COMPIr wit Lk AnkcrrtLum wlLh Uks&Liliraco-Ael and L4:Fa1r Hu,malL6 AC11. 14 �kpp!16;sm Mall b4 mmncihle QgFnNS lcilnn and compliwcewiLh 4my Sedipn4rl4 Psrinnkinp LhLhL;Ull}be rcqui:N-d by dfi Arm;f orFo a!LILeMLLLS 15.ile+rinpa Adl cx v um:nFgrINix LxxiLmii utih Ow xfmdim Pom OfrKr. I k CucupL cbm LLA mwtx zh it I Ix ubmWeil Lu i6c M rIO�UM Bui6dog ikpntmcoL"At bmkline pndLNV6!1%ill 0 enyimewd fillslfL1.uhrrc L1LI;Iay utwill eF ulop h11 MJLel,,rt 17. 1he aL ga vqP a*a :r sh411 br Rv1nu 16 Id RiLI A Lhal the%Uw L I`.LML'F11n-el[5 al. a Am f L i m Intt aam of ll-kut stuwd ik-Ih,LrhL--i nwNnlud rw.*knaonrlwm:r rLtl�.ulum nib o w I!Mift Lu L l LhK boffins a vzUOm Or L6E cruNI sr]Y N cil lhvm \i�al leas!I-FPOL:lm'v. Ix 11lr ippli4mce 4kdij 4!iPgvnea,hldl la ndpaln..Ne for Ln pcow-n dalI it gmmn andar drilmnq fa[ilitS aiOrn ibN5 pnrpeu 11La1 lW npi fbN ua14f 1bc w3!gi,1;wq{(Rn imRalL4ndistria or Ak'l 11) Md 4khism eudlneo shnl I t,hst wR L'raiFfjS'*IL1I%brit the 1 W 111nc#hdLr bcrn Ihmadd M a Dwedmce wish ihr apprvsod deslpF Plan; Th1 F{CriFFcrr-'I n%,I I fir nrqumd I1 Wm a crni5uK 8f OLLupaarp u LsOxd%f an\'SIMIL LOCi i AILIP IILr ML'L I 19.At Ow cnmpleiron ofdreVmicci-ih��eaT�p�p�lkanS dra11 Ile n ihON;!to mibr.Lk record drsu mpWw LkUtiv of i4�efkbaB ALoaCAD ganAu&. Airs rraord draswAmES nlusl be recnred and agvoxxd prior to Lhe isslldmec or a califlogion of moipsn4y for uny ;arlx;urrs w iihin The pTu*l 20.A UMLLL Lchl.IAW-All Amd U2 Im FILtIWJL'd B1 L`[6%A•xWMLUUcLFLLFI pLa1se.-'Sited hg us hl pl ngWIFernteLL rR lined in i x�1;m F;-f of lkc Irilryave cm Siandands for,Nvi i.Lylhtimv A of the sla.duds Lao trc fo,md H dLua�+laxwLiomdlaeekiw,dLrrc'LvLblit.,�11,onuvL'id-_'7� 21.Thvfii4l'O1 Malkllmw regL4M&dL 6'1e%IW-Mr pau W Ike Cray sperO Milike-091Y is d14 araaLrrtl cf 115%d the int]cwb*hwKn vk Fa 9w A irh mmpip4 srwzr,wnLa mud F sc m*wFu Lom peiof io faoi pksi MilLiluuurie.lhro rLlm4 tiryq br+rri FaLLaI Icy ri I iar iiLYF!<iH9 rnLirLaiu pwxi8rd bX lIs¢orFnKr Ilo Lre C'irr 111e sr�±c�F Lie poeelod Fn 11sL!lor,u nF p d ir,erp�plalG!slits L1fLnxi�car pdsn Fx ksrd Appk=inur Ills dN dpp11C11Irdn isx hmae r .gAimhpn ba FPLPW srn Lhd y-e }QFIYII Orally F C%VILPPocM I3epia•hneo4+ to P1ggg aXniao J.Tj ac TkTF,rrw<$ -jpr fix muff Infammwn m 07.2211. 22.Thic-ILI ofMrddim,regwres Amt tkrtmorirfpw wik C-"awnrRaly sacly iri theammmi.vr I'Mof Lre wW ew14vue1rnrl cost rkra1L ompkied:ewes_'Fnlci and scuba mfrm4ftrarre iar dwa rin Ol-iari`y%!rRm Ttn+Lurery ON fir+eaifkd by a liar ilrrd co€i wimm ynyv W by ihs ewwr ud Lk--C1iy.Tlic wkty ens he pooled irk de r6m nfm iuu.u:ablc Low of erMit.cmh depmil("Maki Appkanl niusr file an dpofCrliiW N soma.u h ich saP be Lrlumd an the Comm Lamy LhcrtlupeLtw L)LpuFLalcaL Wrhaiic. Plcax conuct Und D0,11aprotoL SL PJ=car mrlrc inf AL11;11;fm al 1:S7-',I t City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions C. Irrigation Districts 1. Boise Project Board of Control W W M WKMMXna -9ar AM-0,►s w m. Lk)is! PSMIEV I' BOARD OF CO.WROL +�r•+•d„arm.nn ow s rnc,a Iwou,uoai,�.� II4MEMIYY*fjl[!4[MOWLTf W,i11i 0[IIT n f'itT ER ii UOL.-��Ih �' ,-w.ia �LiY11F0f ii �NIwN�R�G� r+PL"M-M-h, 7XOK16 i0ftIpLC.11 #SGHILE�Rfi� rYYI M,�16p["a�F• �IT�9l�9�,lI[T 1R7L YAM fl rtR-�anrf [[r -M iRI/tr� MAM IBM 0 76 IiW Jr-I.F� fl,'i a4 vY 17()Nobar 2025 City C*k'x DFF-mc 33 E BVOd4WAY AMM Suiec E4Z Nwdlm 11),&164 RL IGII Canlury FimY T-u%vrAxw c% ThI-J%rxk#4C od E F l ill Piuk MbA,FP,KZ 11-211 A41073 New YaA Irrigrrlrum I)Ignci NY-329-I}Uta5 MI-0SI,001-17,S77-dW-(W Ctrnirma6 n I aural I IN-00 r,.33-T3*i.R I L OM- Nick NWI i_Flamer. Tlkru mu ix, Plow Non or Ncw Yak lrriludim THM69 raalitica loco d on Ow *bnVc- mmiurwd prupumws,bow"Ihey An In fact passam4L L114 wafer right l"er Walk 1:lat Fk*1 Title 42, k+cdl lnigaei dr itu0e 40*1 Om(hW 1hi: ptopem,to semE nciLhbcrr 4 prupcn1m ntLdt retrain unu4atnr.led and pm1rc wl tj ain apprnprinft aocnxni hg the inmle wner,dc%vlW r and cmirx-orr. I.wrinu,KTr*Ydoper mslxr d,l lheir Jut dilio5t k, LKexi all ouncr%aF origl6oriM proptvtio cm this OULLct. Ir ywr de*c wy further Llura+Iiva.Of a3ra.no1at1 rt�r041ii0a lii, Ift9wr,plr-W&MA hf2biLmc In olarw t up it 001)344-11 a 1- r , 11omnL R.Iitbd yr Aawatm PrTiml Mui%m tbf>fr M L evo Kan?ca Wumunmocr,Div;2 0?K Dn%Wn I lmmon Scwcwa y-rv*oLm.N Yll) FRV City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions D. West Ada School District(WASD) 0 IS-T. West Ada 4.. SC1400L DISTRICT November 2L 2025 R E,HI Irs Centu ry Farm Town homes MESA.PP,RL H-2024-0872 bear Meridian City Plannets: Wie$tAda School district has experienced Si$nikant and sustained growth in 5tVd$nt enrollment d4ring the last ten years_Based on ru rrent enroll ment data spedfi€to the area surrounding this proposed development,'ga eStir^aL- development consisting of 72 sin$le-family units and 0 multi-family units could hawse approximately 44SCINW aged Childiterr.Appfaval of this appliWtign will affect enrollments at the fallowing szhaals in West Ada School District. Enrollment Lapacitw Hllladare Elementary School 772 57S* Program Capacity Lake Hanel Middle School 981 Lt7f1U Mountain View High School 251G 217' West"School District suppprt5 economic growth;however,growth fasters the need forodditional school Capaclty. Currently entitled developments will continue to have an impa€t on the district's enrollment and available capaclty south of the inte rstate. Wtion school enrollment exceeds capacity,to meet the need for additional school capacity In this area one or more of the fol low ing wil I be implemented: ■ Transporting5tudents to an alternate school with available davrpomS- * Attendance area adjustments if there is availability in a nearby school, • Passage of a bond to build new schools to fit the enrollment needs, * Portable classrooms placed on the property at the middle school:Portable space Is not available at Mary MtPherson f lemerrtary,Hillsdale Elements ryr or Mountain View High_ West Ada School Dlstrlct requests developers'consideration for providing safe welkways,bike paths,and pedestrian access for our students to schools and community resources, Singerely, Miranda Carson f)i rector or Transportation&Pla n n ing City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions MEMORANDUM-SCHOOL IMPACTS �1 AN { [ mwiiilrr'r dEWLaPmErri-DERBPTMENT �J'E Wipber 22-2025 To. ItIEk Napoli,MSOEWO Plannef CC: bill fa rwr4 Curran#llarrrNng Supervisw FROM: WOO MCC1wr,1wg,e ftnrmq kuraprvisut RE: 1i-204-W72=HMIs Cennwy$arm towrrhpmms CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS Mr pi apoi rd rrs-dental dcvrrapmrnt appl Wiern is generally Icrr atce at 39l]Et E Hlli Park St thin sectlan of the.»ema lacks at Eumalwive impacts wer abroad area and proMes encaiernem dau.n areas iIfeitrd by she subject ippllcarlpe.The EoUawlrqt Iaformarran IS intended asa reiererxe,rather than a decisiyv tnoP,andwrwsivforecasl the number of scMaol-aged Ehildren,enrailed in bash public and phi es€fmub,using EitY-witle¢enws data_ To deft and wltfrin thin leak Nw"m.tt.ere hmy!bete 27111P ankhkd unitr�164 srngle damlhr and j r+muhr-larndy)approved oveWdh,n a 1.rnlla rafttof I"prpt#et bpr.itipn reap n reaping I a rO■arralely.2#r}mftalL imW chkilmlr. fvresastrd 5twdiirnts Bawd on E ntitlrrntni r 3 � r Ekwrrrrary Mltliiii Farts 7nW 1%1wh ERM -ftwir ep. rYPt{.� TOfd units. rr+f'dfr�nmffw Pn C arrprw IiAi'n fnr pr{1unr+larK Prarx C+drC�'r.gnt:aoq�hannr VW pfianitt Qykl JOY 44 S W"P nus dofo rrfhrJTO U,oy ej4*V rrrppNdr DdN ore+ri.rudr.pee4irip op�J�crtton 'rKIumng[Ke EubteV appbrar err.Apnea&-� dorvrs:neJ m drr{rmrld prrvvii ow IhcNArF Ad[inn,rrvorfrnrnd tv gt&*r tar"Ne and Jr+rerr ichboh. f City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions fXMBfTA CHEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT-STUDENT GENERATION RATES west Ada 3.€hooi Lliktelct(w,xsb)uses a 5tudfint 6,vnpration"ate SSGpI to dotermirw what irnpaot future development will have an enrollments.using wASUs SSR,the following is City staff'saeiessmanr:The SGR iar Hlllsdale Elementwy SLMol r6 Q.6}ar undle famiy ane 0.2 for multi-tamitY.Barad an the sutmmitted apliAwicin materials,the proposed pvject w71 contain 71 singlr family unks and*mtiltl-family units resOft in imuxlcrm"y 43 school-m�ed children arross all grade levels Please noes that the suhkrt erole€t area has some eretna„s residle*pl enwemenu WNW are not Induded In cumulativeforecsst reoartloxl The pnwased project is within 0a latlarrrng jchoal Dnt,ndartes,tweremly,and appr&dal of the proreet map rtfcct pn rpllments at these sdwGls' 5000111 AttrrsdwKe Ann 2445'enroa>R@Rt Ardwectw411 "WWR capa€ltr Capacity Wid"E4mfntiry30ioW 766 70D 675 L&%k Hazel MaM S[haal 9S7 tOk7 - W4wnulnvmhvr girSrlWd 2479 21.7% Notes, r Student Lerner aGan Jtares are-eare Wore d"r�efertnce to lkie dcsjpi re .eui, --Y—�w.!.q•!t the iuf+MctPoprWiorsauoledsrbuororondiamceww. rhu irownwitponxinr"dedusorvfrmtice, rnata tkm a decrvw#Gal r jl ywrr coo be buitr An phmer and fait mwarts nor w rdtorr e ArdWr4!etsvofCtpariry-rhewpoarrrjtWM.,.trYinOwrirrwikjcho&Jsdesiprreddned-0tlthe Atrrriee,eJgenteW edtKa[aditd di!jn Wrht ur rfx GtN011P. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions E. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) IWMIL ACHDWne{,eM�ha'pr,CnniNWrwhrr / LS"W-Vj Cunmatlaar - 1t Ositrlca NRSWfn ConmlctlDfW Date:lanuary 29,2025 To Eli&9rtSkl,flrlglMon Co+p. 5Aaff Contact:Sarn Standal,Amirctant Traffic Engineer Project Descriptiatti Hilts Century Farms T11p GOCAvatlon Tbn detreftMent R ASUrr}ated to$e41Brwe V-hrCl9 MPS per day, 41 vehicle lyips pot rMOX in trio PM poak hour-based on too I rrttitum of Transpo.tat eat Eng ineer5 Trip GL-rwrabun Manual,TP editiom- Area Poads wil men NO he futura with 1 Ccimments: V. f}ofTl?ving you to mofe Ada Ferry nigh"ramlr.T-3Tt5IWinx Scram-Cvdan CAy.ir]-B3Tk-Ph 7M X17-OW-FX 34F'WD dwww&&4KWK+Y4 FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to the Mixed-Use Neighbor future land use map designation for the site. The Commission determined since the proposed development falls into the 30- City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 60%residential requirement for the Mixed-Use Neighborhood designation and is providing additional vehicular and pedestrian connectivity in the area that it is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds that the proposed map amendment and subsequent development will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available in the City A addition, the proposed development will provide housing near a regional park, YMCA, and elementary school. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed zoning amendment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The public testimony given at the hearing discussed concerns regarding traffic and over capacity schools, the commission ultimately determined that the proposed development would not make an impact that would be determinantal to the area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds that the proposed amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services to this site. One of the main concerns from the public testimony was regarding Hillsdale Elementary School and Mountain View High School being over capacity. The Commission determined that the proposed seventy homes would not have adverse impacts to the school district serving the estimated additional students generated by this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This is not applicable due to this application being a rezone. B. Preliminary Plat and Short Plat(UDC-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds thatpublic services are available and can be extended into the site to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; City water and sewer and other utilities will be extended by the developer at their own cost, therefore, the Commission find the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission finds there are no natural, scenic, or historic features that need to be preserved with development of this property. C. Private Streets In consideration of the private street application the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article; The Commission finds the design of the private street meets the requirements listed in Article A of the private street code. 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance,or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity; The Commission finds the proposed private streets will not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the Regional Transportation Plan; and The Commission finds the location of the private streets does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and Regional Transportation Plan. The proposed development will be finishing the construction of E. Hill Park Street(local street)which will help finish the transportation plan in this area. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or a gated development community,promotes infill, or is a planned unit development. The Commission finds the proposed residential development promotes infill by developing vl1 some of the last empty sites in the general vicinity of the development. In addition, the proposed development will provide better vehicular connectivity. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed modification to the Development Agreement, Rezone, and Preliminary Plat with the conditions of approval listed in Section IV. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on November 20t1i, 2025. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Rezone,preliminary Plat and Development Agreement Modification requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing a. In favor: Amanda McNutt b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: James Phillips,Alan Harris,and Chris Johnson(Not the clerk) d. Written testimony: We received written testimony from 31 citizens with concerns regarding school capacities,traffic and safety,inadequate parking utility capacities, density, and City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action inconsistency with the comprehensive plan. Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High schools being over capacity. The citizens described the traffic as gridlock with people doing reckless maneuvers that cause safety concerns. In addition,the citizens were concerned with the data used by ACHD which dates back to 2019. e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. Hillsdale Elementary School and Mountain View High School being over capacity, Centerville (nei borin development)evelopment)has not been fully built out yet and was also rezoned to remove commercial for residential,traffic during peaks hours of the day and around major school drop off and pick up has become significant and unsafe,and the lack of commercial in south meridian for residents to use. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The commission discussed the schools being over capacity and decided to let city council make the ultimate determination on this issue. In addition,they discussed the transition from residential to commercial and whether losing additional commercial space for more residential was appropriate. The commission also discussed the viability of commercial uses without any street frontage. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s)for City Council: a. Hillsdale Elementary and Mountain View High School being over capacity,whether losing additional commercial space for residential is appropriate,traffic in the immediate and broader area, and whether the density of the development is appropriate. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action � 1 •- /_ W kovEL � i;,_ Inl I � R � i I. 1 1!Illillll w■■ rj�, 11111 - - hull I� n-il�mII—__ull 1111 S IN >• 1111� 1 am: nll nll 111f 111� ! ■ , 117 - Ilnr!Ind Imo'^■tnla�I_rn .,,.�. Iirlfl . . .. Ilur mldlll illllillll, -o= Illl�j - fh. „�IIV � - fl �. . • �-W�S�— Illllllillll r -. 1�_Ir�� 111111 i``j 1111 lulu IIIIIIIIIItIL t• rr■■■ 1 Ilflrrl1rQ1111{ Irlll �r nnf \�I uurl: C■m111� k I111r f fu.w _ 9 LI■III■p� ♦ 1/ 111111 __uu Ism = 11�i � a1 a`11 � 1 111=■�,�' =-_- - w�llll 1mm� _ _ IIII� u� Free �lil Ia1 : ,�It��r.AMITY -•` ■■■■�■�■1 � r— '�Rll �� r��illlllllll 2s�1l/�� t� ptlik�9ii�' �r�.�_�IIHIIIIl111� �UCJ r'_ �..wr,Illllnn � �.. ■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIq ' 1111 IIr11, 71111��111111111f ply/ \ H11111 211111 11 i�l1111q �� 1�1a��1�il1il�i�.:��i�� C��■■an'ill •: I `'/ � 1■F 4 � ■ ��w.r� rr \11�� . .-w ►t I ♦ ♦ r rr. l ME rw w tea_ ■ 11 11 1, r I1` ..ME� � ��•� ��r' —�� ' .� Ir/� aRf..ME 111111 �/1/ w ♦ ■11 � 1n11 rlt`:=�t�lm ,,r..__ ••�'��:��0�4�; mut►��i I��Illi.`• 1 :l 1'r 111 �■� ■1 1��/ G Inl -:1: WIN �II:�i 1��1�1I1II1rI1rt I1t111"11" ,-C. LQ�7�S�II11ll1ll1ul1l1ll1li/t prC~l{��w'1r 111l11l�r1r■r1l 1l�I�IIIIIA1IAl1I1111i111l11I .r�.w� wT+IIIIIIIIII �-'w��' 3. Future Land Use Legend Medium pensir Project Location _ Residential Area of Impact �o 0 Analysis ® ® MU-C } L MU=r4 r CIYR �iOW.0 nnnsi Resldentlal� 4. Planned Development Map Legend Mlug i■ Project Location ;. � ,s Area of Impact T==' City Limits rE o ��,1P Planned Parcels - 'OAnalysis 1 n 1 � J T City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits B. Subject Site Photos iwr�7- MOW— to-_ 1-3wwTw! ..d- . . e.a-/`:e. .1 -l._, tea! 11.�.r JI ... Y y..�:'1F r,. •a...l City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL 51133212576 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Scare: 30 139th Percentile Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 f .from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 1 DO yr floodplain or> 2 acres GREEN L Emergency Services Fire Response time 5-9 min. YELLOW Emergency Services police 44eets response time gaals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 114 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 114 of current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration(#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing (#of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 112 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementa ry Schoo I within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Either Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 112 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within GREEN 114 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Original Concept Plan AMITY R ! 'I FHLL+S CENTURY FARM BETA SELFSERYICE 5T0#tAGE IIJPR04E551QO L _� � � C4MINERCl/kL Su801V1514N � DFFI E qr VERANDA+ LIVING . ESTATE LOTS JF' Hillsdale q 4 -111I t CIty Park I I � �� WO .KILL'S GFNTURY M SUBS ISION 7 � ,:`. # � I' A LA HmLps CENTmT FARM NoRTH ` l ' r Gc[ober K.2019 CONCEPTUAL-WI PECT T4 CHANGE h FOR City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Site Plan(date: 9/18/2025) it .. r .' I -- inismmiar ruu r ruuuw,.,. C+r I ,5�ir.w BRI HTON CONCEPTLAI,SUBJEC UO CHANGE City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits I ■ m......r�®�eoo �1=0� 1k=n 6 7 I 000��o�o�o l� sMill000�©oo kN ME :�i�l �i .•y ma�oaa�ooco �� 1� II nano w s.�3dehx �xi�� ro ti y + ' i� .ski ti ��'��iIF.A�SiYvfi a1�111.T��•'�S! II IQ I p tomIla ------------- pm I 1' 1 1 ' 1' UIHDGbVPE PLAN ___ - _.., 1 � EXISrnNG TREE INVENTORYAND MITIGATION PIAN ��_mMyW-_ - 4'S[fNfIMYfAAM IbwN �•';.'�.,�Ian L A��Ip4�xelO /. WA. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Preliminary Plat(date: 9/18/2025) PRELIMINARY PLAT SHOWING HILL'S CENTURY FARM TOWNHOMES SUBDIVISION u.a H—.u. ,ownwwa_TH,x. E 1 mn,ar,orco.�..uuw,�muwn,wow IT -- --- -- - ---- ------ -n-- - - -- -- LES.- ...A WE- -'aka REE -=__ --- =_--__� =_ -,� _ f , -' _ g� Irk----- ------�Ff- ` - - wat— i 1 r 9-4 �.. •� _:_� _—_T_—_—_—_—_�_ JAI_—_—___—_—_—_—_—_ ~moo City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits STREET SECTION A(PRIVATE ALLEY) — STREET SECTION 6IPRIVRTEI �^ r S�s•7 —� r ------------- STREET SECTION C(PRNRTE� —�-- �a STREET SECTION❑IPRNATEI �i — STREET SECIMII E(PU" ; -f- = u=Q Z:lm low _� FEET SECTION F IPRNATEI ~aPiz Y 8 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation Hills Century Farm Townhomes Preliminary Plat , Rezone , & DA Mod City Council December 16, 2025 �;- BRIGHTON Project Location and Surrounding Area '£►4mity-Rd -- EAmity d 4—&Amity Rd.. E pity Rd � � r J( RA, S Taufstock Aue E �� '�� W E l(aiinga;Ln M, E Kalinga Ln _ 5�liill F�aiLm n ~E..Hill-Park StUl E Hill.Par•k S# 1 z I E Macumba Ln a '� �:.E Rlneon Ct Hiilsdafe Park E Rincon E Rockhampton St R -Jon ...,,tackenram Way BRIGHTON Zonin . Current Zoning Proposed Zoning RPM . i t si: sd c.a � E Hill PLtrk St E Hill Park S# The project is currently zoned C-N, Proposed overall zoning is R-15 . and R-15 . 4 �;- BRIGHTON Comprehensive Plan Current Comprehensive Plan • Use Map Idaho • � • • • • � • as Neighborhood ■• 111111111E111 changes proposed • 111111 � _ comprehensive plan .LL FL + + + + ++ + + ++ + 3 S f 49110- BRIGHTON Comprehensive Plan Alignment Mixed Use Community Concept Diagram Single Family I g� Residential "Connectivity and access between...uses is particularly critical in HCF Cadence Apartments, MU-N areas Four-plexs Streets connect directly to the or Duplexes HCF - - commercial drive aisle. Townhomes ll Sidewalks provided throughout - L Plaza Area for pedestrian connectivity. Office or — Service Use �� - "Residential uses...between 30% and Services, 7, 60% of the development area, with office, and gross densities ranging from 6 to 12 retail units/acre" E �.' 7.69 units/acre 0. a �_. �� 57.3% residential Hillsdale Ave CollectarRoad 6 BRIGHTON Lan • Uses Idahc Pawer. a E Kalinga Ln a' E E Hill P; E Hill Park St a h S N N N E Macumho Ln E Rincon Ct E Rincon St s ■ Land Uses Acreage %of MU-N Hill's Century Farm North 2 29.78 acres Out Parcel Residence 2.59 acres Proposed Hill's Century Farm Townhomes 9.102 acres SUBTOTAL:Residential 41.47acres 57.3% SUBTOTAL: Non-Residential 30.76 acres 42.7% TOTAL: COMBINED MU-N 72.23 acres 100.0% 7 49111- BRIGHTON Lan • Uses The Comprehensive Plan previously included Hillsdale Park and the YCMA site, during an update made by the city, these were reclassified as "Civic' If they had remained "MU-N" Hills Century Form Townhomes would be well under the expected residential percentage, either way it is compliant with the comprehensive plan. PublicBRIGHTON • • Commercial .. Concern : - - Not enough commercial not Nail Salon Fitness/Gym _ enough diversity in commercial Bank Dry Cleaner Veterinarian Response : Grocery & ' Shown are services within a Pharmacy }_ half mile radius of the , ,... _ Medical Sandwich, Noodle, and Burger Shops _ Offices intersection at Eagle/Amity. (some with Drive Thru Te) Dental Office MU-N Sample Uses per the Comprehensive Plan: } r single-family homes, alley-loaded single-family Storage Orthodontist homes, townhouses, small-scale multi-family, ., � � -,�_.� � neighborhood grocers, drug stores, coffee/sandwir /ice-cream shops, vertically Daycare integrated buildings, live-work spaces, a, y YMCA cleaner/laundromat, salons/spas, daycares, neighborhood-scale professional offices, gift shops, schools, parks, churches, clubhouses, public uses. Higher intensity uses are not expected in MU-N 9 BRIGHTON Density 1AM - • 64 Attached carriage-lane --- _ = MLLS CE NfL0.'4.H1/ N homes & 4 detached "`N ' ------------ carriage-lane homes ----- - - • 7. 69 d u/acre r } 3 • Adjacent to community- serving commercial uses _ - F HILS CIF kTLWlAFR - {N (doctors, dentist, fitness, etc. ) - • Near Hillsdale Park and YMCA -:• $RIGHT0 CONCEPTUAL,5U5JECT70 CHANGE 10 49,11- BRIGHTON Schools • Hills Century Farm Townhomes will be served by Hillsdale Elementary, Lake Hazel Middle School, and Mountain View High School . • Brighton is actively working with West Ada School District to provide a new school site in south Meridian to serve this area . SchoolBRIGHTON • and Data Pepper Ridge _ - Enrollment Trends in South Meridian 825 3700 slam 800 775 3600 iA1&hwsoo - ` 750 Lake — Haxei pe 725 Sage` 3500 700 A 675 3400 650 625 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Highest Total Enrollment 600 3300 2019: 3656 Students 5 550 3200 525 Lowest Total Enrollment 500 3100 2015: 3116 Students 475 450 3000 Current Total Enrollment 425 425 2024: 3175 Students 375 2900 350 Current enrollment is 481 325 2800 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2021 2022 2023 2024 students less than the highest enrollment year Hillsdale Siena Lake Hazel Desert Sage Mary McPherson Pepper Ridge —Total - • Linear(Total) and only 59 more than the *Year 2020 Removed (Decreased enrollment across all schools due to COVID-19) lowest enrollment year. 12 49,11- BRIGHTON Schools in South Meridian Brighton is committed to the education and well being of students. As part of that commitment, our team has : 1 . Donated the land and completed offsite infrastructure for the construction of Hillsdale Elementary School 2 . Donated the land and completed offsite infrastructure for the construction of South Meridian Gem Prep Charter School 3 . Are actively working with West Ada School District to ready an additional school site to serve south Meridian . 4. Are actively working with a charter school that serves grades 6- 12 to ready a site in south Meridian . 13 BRIGHTON Roadways - AM"WX - ,r1 _ Public Street — On Street H]LLS CENTURY FIRM y NORTH NO.1 ° Parking Permitted - `-IN { Private Street — On Street Parking Permitted yy` l r t Private Street — No Parking H It L 5 CENTURY FARM _ NORTH N0.2 Carriage Lane — No Parking _ - " 1 Commercial Drive Aisle - I "CMMROALN0 CN * Each home has 4 individual ° parking spaces (2 garage, 2 - ` HILLPAR(51 off street parking pads) 14 F V BRIGHTON Amenities r Amenities P WLSCENII PY FAPM Y� NORTH Na.1 C-N Picnic Shelter 2 Points • 2 Points Required q — Picnic Shelter REFERENCE PHOTO l 1Y FARM I w. 5 detached sidewalks 0.2 Y I 19.3% Qualified Open t Space - - - -- - -- HILLS CERTUPY FARM - COMMEPCL41 N0.1 • '! C.N • 15% Required PARKST. AFL 15 �;- BRIGHTON Elevations my f 49,11- BRIGHTON Conclusion We concur with staffs conditions of approval and request City Council's approval of the Preliminary Plat, Rezone, & DA Mod for Hills Century Farm Townhomes. Discussion BRIGHTON TownhoAssisted Living - AMITY ROAD lini I Fw%--f- Century Farm r . -)TownhoriveUn - r— ° ^� � ' m Q , z -) r Q P p D ' m Hillsdale 1 �-' City Park YMC 'I top , ' Il sdal r E I 0ern�moy - " {�! 1. � PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN = ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN 24 -11 _ ter- ► ViewpointsBRIGHTON - - ITY ROAD _ 140, ---�: - - r . 1 , ,r Wr �if, � _,..IS Century Fa'r �Townhomesl � m ram - � � , o 04# z a , a mR Hillsdale ` City Park mclewl - it sdal 0 rL — — PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN ORIGINAL CONCEPT PLAN 25 -;- BRIGHTON Massing r■ ___ ___-�, .ice �A_ �� _.._..�.. wK r ! pi�M x 'An w fund .--F ■_fir-. r- -_ ,� ■.--� ,� �.. ... moll L71 01M- 401 r: .4 MM-1- PLA4 D�D ld� DIE] EE�E . ;