Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 19, 2007 P&Z Minutes Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 13 of 47 Rohm: Possibly we could have had a little bit of discussion to just validate that there is - - you know, if there is any concerns from any of the Commissioners about moving forward with that, because by the time we get back to it after Item 15 -- and so -- I don't know. Mr. Nary, is this appropriate for us to have some discussion at this point in time? Nary: Mr. Chairman, certainly. Rohm: Okay. So, I guess with that being said, is there any concern over this application that any of you feel are unresolved? Moe: I have none. Siddoway: I have no concerns with any of the previous Jabil applications. Item 9: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-001 Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation from Industrial to Commercial for the property located at 600 E. Franklin Road for Thomas Comprehensive Plan Amendment by Lynn Thomas - north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: Item 10: Continued Public Hearing from AprilS, 2007: RZ 07-002 Request for a Rezone of 0.628 of an acre from I-L to C-G zone for the Lynn Thomas Property by Lynn Thomas - north of E. Franklin Road and east of Meridian Road: Rohm: Okay. That's kind of where I was going with that. Okay. Thank you. All right. At this time I'd like to open the continued Public Hearing from April 5th, 2007, Item No. CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002. Both of these items related to the Thomas property on Franklin Road and begin with the staff report. Watters: Thank you, Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission. I'll just give a quick recap on this, since this is a continued item. The subject property is located here on the north side of Franklin Road. It's right next to the fire station. Here in purple. The applicant is requesting that the Comp Plan be amended to a commercial designation, rather than industrial on this property, and is also requesting a rezone from I-L to C-G. The applicant did not submit a development plan, but did submit -- it's just a vacant piece of property. Did submit a conceptual elevation for the propose building on the site. That's all staff has, unless the Commission has questions. Rohm: Any questions of staff? Moe: I have none. Siddoway: Sonya, is the conceptual elevation tied to a development agreement in the staff report? Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 14 of 47 Watters: Chairman Rohm, Commissioner Siddoway, Commissioners, it is not tied to a development agreement -- well, excuse me. Just a second. Let me double-check on that. Siddoway: I think that was the one thing that I had from last time. Watters: Yeah. It was not tied to a development agreement in the staff report. However, I think the Commission wanted to include one at the last meeting for that to be able to tie the elevations to it. Siddoway: Okay. Thank you. Rohm: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. Okay. Sonya, the applicant-- is she aware that there will be a development agreement attached to the staff report specifying the elevations or -- did you have a discussion with -- Watters: Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission, I did not discuss it with her. did leave a voice mail on her phone, so she would be aware of that. Rohm: Okay. I think that a motion might say -- would be conditional to a development agreement seems appropriate to me. Siddoway: That would be my intent, Mr. Chairman. If the applicant has any issue with it she can always take it up with Council. Rohm: There you go. Okay. Is there anyone from the audience that would like to speak to this application at this time? Seeing none -- Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move to close the public hearings on CPA 07-001 and RZ 07- 002. Siddoway: Second. Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearings on CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move that we table CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002 to the end of the meeting after Item 15. Siddoway: Second. Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission April 19, 2007 Page 15of47 Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to table Item CPA 07-001 and RZ 07-002 until after we have heard Item No. 15 on tonight's agenda. All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign. Okay. Motion carried. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. ONE ABSENT. Item 11: Continued Public Hearing from April 5, 2007: CPA 07-003 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map by adding and amending pathway locations for the Pathways Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Department: Rohm: At this time I'd like to open the continued Public Hearing from April 5th, 2007, Item No. CPA 07-003 related to the Pathway Comprehensive Plan Amendment and begin with the staff report. Lucas: Thank you, Chairman Rohm, Members of the Commission. If you don't mind, I'd just like to take a moment and say I have truly enjoyed my time with the City of Meridian and just so you know, one of my favorite parts of the job is the interaction that I have with you at this meeting and with the public. I appreciate this process and think it's very important and have really enjoyed my time here with the city and the ability I have had to try and participate in this process. And so with that said, I will move onto the Pathways Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As was discussed at the last meeting, this is the proposed update to the Comprehensive Plan land use map. Specifically it's an update to the pathway network that is indicated on that plan. There was quite a bit of discussion at the last meeting regarding this -- regarding this proposed amendment and I feel that most of the concerns were taken care of at that last meeting. I don't think there is much more to discuss from staff's perspective at this point. Rohm: Thank you. Any questions of staff? Siddoway: I have none. Moe: I have none. Rohm: Okay. And I believe you're right. And just for those of you that are here tonight, basically, the discussion centered around concerns that pathways were going to be developed on properties that were -- with homes that -- backyards that were existing there, rather than as part of a redevelopment program and that discussion I believe alleviated a lot of the concerns from last week, because none of those folks are here tonight. So, I think that concludes the discussion on the pathway Comprehensive Plan amendment. Could I get a motion to close the Public Hearing? Moe: You want to make sure the public doesn't -- Rohm: There is nobody signed up, but if anyone would like to come forward and speak to the pathways, now is that time. Seeing none --