Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-11-18 Regular Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader, Vice President Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 6:00 PM The City of Meridian is committed to providing equal access to all public meetings. If you need accommodation, an alternative format, or language assistance to fully participate, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@meridiancity.org 72 hours prior the scheduled meeting. Materials presented at public meetings are subject to disclosure pursuant to the Idaho Public Records Act. Public Meetings of the Meridian City Council are streamed live at https://meridiancity.org/live and can be joined virtually at https://bit.ly/meridianzoommeeting Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader ABSENT Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilman Whitlock. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader 1. Approve Minutes of the November 5, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the November 5, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Calkins Creek Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-205- 0154) 4. Multi-Tenant Retail Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0151) 5. Multi-Tenant Retail Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0152) 6. Multi-Tenant Retail Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2025-0153) 7. Southridge South Subdivision Phase 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025- 0139) 8. Village at Meridian Phase 2B Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT- 2025-0146) 9. Development Agreement (Centrepoint Apartments - Parcel E - H-2025-0009) Between City of Meridian and MGM Meridian LLC for Property Located at 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. 10. Development Agreement (Centrepoint Apartments - Parcel F - H-2025-0009) Between City of Meridian and MGM Meridian LLC for Property Located at 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. 11. Project/Pathway Agreement between the City of Meridian and the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District for Construction and Continued Operation of a Pedestrian Pathway and Other Improvements along the Ninemile Drain and the Rutledge Lateral (Rail with Trail Pathway) ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] PUBLIC FORUM PUBLIC HEARINGS \[Action Item\] 12. Public Hearing for Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) (H-2025-0045) by City of Meridian Planning Division, located City Wide Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2025-0045 A. Request: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) to Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and the Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024), Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein, Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference" including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced and Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to add/modify language. Motion to approve made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilman Whitlock. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader ORDINANCES \[Action Item\] 13. Ordinance No. 25-2101: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-11 Concerning Drive-Through Establishments; and Providing an Effective Date Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Whitlock. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader 14. Ordinance No. 25-2102: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-12, Concerning Accessory Dwellings; and Providing an Effective Date Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Whitlock. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 6:25 PM Meridian City Council November 18, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, November 18, 2025, by Vice-President Liz Strader. Members Present: Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, and Brian Whitlock. Members Absent: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener and Anne Little Roberts. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Caleb Hood, Carl Anderson, Shawn Harper and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts X John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison Strader: Welcome to the Meridian City Council regular meeting. Today is Tuesday, November 18th, 2025, at 6:00 o'clock p.m. We will begin this City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Strader: Now please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. If you will, please, rise. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Strader: Thank you. Now we will recognize Pastor Randy Hunter to lead us in the invocation. Please take this as a moment of prayer or a moment of silent reflection. Go ahead, Pastor. Hunter: Thank you. I have heard nothing since I got here other than how short the agenda is tonight. So, I get a lot of time, because -- no, that's not true. I want to thank you for your work, honorable Council people, Mayor, staff and law enforcement and we love living in Middleton. We have only been here six months, but it's a wonderful place to live. I tuned in to your meeting last week and saw the presentation by COMPASS. What a great group. For somebody like me who is here on behalf of a group of churches that want to see where can we anticipate needs, that group has been very helpful to us, so I appreciate that. Thank you for having me the week before Thanksgiving and, you know, we all think of the Abraham Lincoln declaration -- proclamation of Thanksgiving Day. But, you know, a lot of presidents issued a proclamation for Thanksgiving Day. George Washington, John Adams, James Madison, Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 2 of 12 they all issued national day of Thanksgiving proclamations, but Abraham Lincoln's is the one that stuck and no one knows why. Maybe it's because it's the last one, but maybe it's also because his was less of a declaration of everyone be grateful and more of a call for healing in a nation that was divided, because he -- he issued this proclamation for a national day of Thanksgiving in the middle of the Civil War and, in fact, just a couple months after one of the worst battles of the Civil War, Gettysburg, 50,000 young -- mostly young soldiers died in three days in the Battle of Gettysburg and it's in that context that Abraham Lincoln issued this proclamation. I have copies for all of you. I know you can find it online, but sometimes there is something about a paper copy that maybe finds its way to your Thanksgiving table and maybe find some use for it, so -- and I'm not going to read it to you. It's not that long, but I'm not going to read it. I just want to highlight a couple of things. He rehearses, first of all, reasons. Remember this is Civil War time and yet he rehearses reasons for giving thanks. Let me read a few of them. Peace has been preserved with other nations. Order has been maintained. Laws have been respected and obeyed. Harmony has prevailed everywhere -- except in the military conflict. The plow, the ship, the ax, the mines, the iron, the coal have all been functioning and working. Population has steadily increased. So, he -- he took the time to think of reasons we have to be grateful as a nation and, then, he concluded this. And these are two paragraphs I will read to you. It's about in the middle of the proclamation. No human counsel hath devised, nor has any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath, nevertheless, remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by the whole American people and so he issued this last Thursday of November as a day of thanksgiving and praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the heavens. Well, that's the proclamation and one of the reasons we all get next Thursday off and probably going to eat too much, but there are other reasons and he reminded us of those in the text. To be grateful. Let me close with a hymn that my tribe of Christians uses often around Thanksgiving time. Not going to sing it to you. I will read it. Oh. And, by the way, Abraham Lincoln's Proclamation was in 1863. This man was an English cleric who wrote this hymn in 1864 in England. So, they didn't have a civil war going on and yet he kind of came to the same conclusions. Let's rehearse the good things we have and let that lead us to give thanks and call for healing. So, the hymn goes like this: For the beauty of the earth, for the glory of the skies, for the love which from our birth over and around us lies, for the wonder of each hour of the day and of the night, hill and vale and tree and flower, sun and moon and stars of light, for the joy of human love, brother, sister, parent, child, friends on earth and friends above, for all gentle thoughts and mild, for yourself best gift divine, to the world so freely given, agent of God's grand designed peace on earth and joy in heaven. Christ, our Lord, to you we raise this our hymn of grateful praise. Well, may that be a blessing to all of you this Thanksgiving. Happy Thanksgiving. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Strader: Thank you. With that we will move on to adoption of the agenda. Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 3 of 12 Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Council Member Overton. Overton: No changes to the agenda as published, I move we adopt it. Strader: Okay. Do I have a second? Whitlock: Second. Strader: Okay. We have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda. All in favor please signify by saying aye. Opposed? The ayes have it. The agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the November 5, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the November 5, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Calkins Creek Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-205-0154) 4. Multi-Tenant Retail Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0151) 5. Multi-Tenant Retail Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT- 2025-0152) 6. Multi-Tenant Retail Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2025-0153) 7. Southridge South Subdivision Phase 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025-0139) 8. Village at Meridian Phase 2B Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0146) 9. Development Agreement (Centrepoint Apartments - Parcel E - H- 2025-0009) Between City of Meridian and MGM Meridian LLC for Property Located at 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. 10. Development Agreement (Centrepoint Apartments - Parcel F - H- 2025-0009) Between City of Meridian and MGM Meridian LLC for Property Located at 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 4 of 12 11. Project/Pathway Agreement between the City of Meridian and the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District for Construction and Continued Operation of a Pedestrian Pathway and Other Improvements along the Ninemile Drain and the Rutledge Lateral (Rail with Trail Pathway) Simison: Next we have the Consent Agenda. Overton: Madam Vice-President. Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda, for the Vice-President to sign and the Clerk to attest. Whitlock: Second. Strader: Okay. I have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. All those in favor, please, signify by saying aye. Opposed? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is approved. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There are no items moved from the Consent Agenda. PUBLIC FORUM Strader: So, we will move on to Public Forum. Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up under the public forum? Johnson: Madam Vice-President we did not. PUBLIC HEARINGS [Action Item] 12. Public Hearing for Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) (H- 2025-0045) by City of Meridian Planning Division, located City Wide A. Request: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) to Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and the Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024), Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein, Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 5 of 12 by Reference" including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced and Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to add/modify language. Strader: Okay. All right. With that we will move on to Item 12, the public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment, CPAT H-2025-0045, and I will recognize Mr. Anderson. Anderson: Yes. Thank you, Madam Vice-Chair Strader and Members of the Commission. My name is Carl Anderson, long range associate planner for the record. Tonight we have before you a city-initiated comprehensive plan text amendment, file H- 2025-0045. Pardon me. Just a minor -- Strader: That's okay. While you take a moment I would also like us to recognize -- we do have Commissioner Ron Beck here with us as well. So, if you have any questions I'm sure that he and his staff will be happy to help. Please proceed. Anderson: Thank you. So, tonight's request I will cover -- there are four items that are included within this city-initiated comprehensive plan text amendment. I will detail each of those requests throughout tonight's presentation and present the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation towards the end of the presentation. Those four items are listed here. I will go through each one in detail, rather than read them for you. So, the first item on this request is to adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service capital improvement plan and development impact fee study and Ada County Jail capital improvement plan and development impact fee study, each dated May 24th, 2024. This request would incorporate the county's EMS and jail capital improvement plans and impact fee studies into the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. The impetus behind this is Idaho State Code requires that for those agencies who are conducting comprehensive plans to collect impact fees. Those capital improvement planning documents need to be incorporated within those areas comprehensive plans. This would accomplish that step of including those capital improvement plans within the city's comprehensive plan. This request would not be the enabling action that the city would undertake to collect those impact fees, that would be done through an ordinance, which would be a future step in the process. The table here on your right would -- provides what those impact fees would look like for those jail and paramedic services and I would also draw your attention to attachment B1 -- Exhibit B1 within the staff report, which details memorandum from the City of Meridian's legal staff for the Joint Powers Agreements between the City of Meridian and ambulance district detailing the steps in that process. I believe this would accomplish that final step to there, which is the public hearing conducted by the City of Meridian City Council. So -- and, again, that next step would be to pause until such time the city is ready to undertake the ordinance to collect those fees. So, the second element of the request tonight for you is to adopt by reference the City of Meridian's development impact fee studies dated September 16th, 2022, and amended Capital Improvement Plans as incorporated therein. Similarly, as detailed on the prior request, this is to comply with Idaho State Code in order for the city to collect impact fees. Should this request be approved this Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 6 of 12 development impact fee study and amended CIPs as adopted by ordinance 2022-2004 will be included in the table currently listed as list of adopted plans and studies by reference I will be talking about on the next slide. So, the third item of this request -- some of this was brought forward to the Council during the Comprehensive Plan future land use map amendment earlier this year, some cleanup that was identified therein. While we are getting into the table we have done some other cleanup as well and I will go through some of this. So, this first one here is to re-title this amended -- amend the title from adopted to incorporated. This is a little bit of a process improvements. This is to ensure that those items that are listed in there, while incorporated in the plan, it's not necessarily always the case that they may be adopted. We are going to be looking at kind of tracking those through the resolution number and include that on the city's website, so we can see which of those would be adopted, what the resolution number is and this way if they are incorporated therein they still inform the city's Comprehensive Plan, but it's not necessarily the adopting item. It's a little bit of a process improvement. The second one here is to add a note to city led planning efforts to ensure that the most recent version of the plan study is referenced within this plan. We are adding this only to those city led planning efforts. Those are those items that the Council will have their eyes on, but to ensure that when we are referencing any of the city led planning documents therein we are referencing the prior version. For example, this cleanup is to cleanup some of those that are some older planning documents. So, just to make sure that we are staying current with those plans. The intent there, though, is that if it's not a city-wide planning document that the Council will have their eyes on those documents to ensure that the version that we are adopting is the one that the City of Meridian wants to incorporate within the plan. Update by reference. The most current version of a plan or study. This is detailed within the exhibit here and so this is updating the current -- to the most current version of the plans that are referenced there and to make sure that we have the most current. The four items -- we are including four new items here. So, three of these are the items that we have discussed on the prior two elements of this request. So, the City of Meridian's capital improvement plan and development impact fee studies, the Ada County EMS and jail capital improvement plan and development impact fee studies and also the waste -- the City of Meridian's wastewater resource recovery facility dated 2018. This was an item that was identified by the City of Meridian Public Works Department during our pre-application. It is a planning document that is -- we want to have included within the city's comprehensive plan. Future additions to this that aren't being brought forward at this time is the Eastern -- Eastern Treasure Valley electric plans is Idaho Power's electric transmission planning document. The version that's referenced is the prior version. There is a new version. This is not being brought before you at this time. It is the staff's understanding that Council has not had an opportunity to review that document and at such time when Council has had that opportunity we would bring it forward for incorporation into the plan. Similarly, the City Council, as you are aware, is working with Meridian Development Corporation onto the Destination Downtown plan. There is an updated version of this plan. This is an item that we may bring forward in the future date for adoption of that plan should the Council wishes to do -- wish staff to do so. One item that I would like to address here as well -- there is -- you will see one of those is -- there was a duplicate. We deleted the prior Destination Downtown plan. And, finally, staff are Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 7 of 12 proposing to amend Appendix A to the Comprehensive Plan glossary of terms and to add -- modify language here. So, there is two primary elements here. So, the first is the capital improvement program. The language that is used throughout is capital improvement program. When talking with staff here at the city it's my understanding that this is a prior practice vestige of prior planning when this capital improvement planning was referred to capital improvement programming and in order to be consistent with the language we are using for these documents and state code we are recommending that language plan be included. This was recommended to the Planning and Zoning Commission as it was not originally proposed to include the program to plan throughout. We -- staff recommended that the Commission include that in their motion and the Planning and Zoning Commission did include that in their motion, so we have shown it to you here with the blue underlined text for that language. We did also add originally to clarify that the City of Meridian refers to Capital Improvement Plan as the comprehensive financial plan as practice here. This is to reflect the City of Meridian's Capital Improvement -- Capital Improvement Plan and -- excuse me -- and development impact fee, documents that we are proposing to amend here. It's on page two of that document reflecting that language. And also to add a definition for impact fees. We currently in our Comprehensive Plan do not have a definition for development impact fees. We did pull this language similarly from the city's capital improvement -- or capital improvement plans development impact fee studies. So, this language be -- is being added to be consistent, but also to help with an interpretation should the need arise. All notice -- all notification requirements have been met for this hearing. No public comments, written or verbal have been received to date. Only agency comments that staff has received are from Public Works, who are not opposed to the request and, finally, the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission heard this application on October 16th, 2025. The Commission did recommend the proposed comprehensive plan text amendment H-2025-0045 to Council for approval with the amendment discussed to Appendix A, modifying the language from program to plan through that definition. And with that I'm happy to answer any questions that the Council may have. Strader: Okay. Thank you so much. Appreciate that presentation. Fellow Council Members, do you have any questions for staff? Okay. So, pretty straightforward request. This is a public hearing and with that, Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up ahead of time? Johnson: Madam Vice-President, nobody's signed up. Strader: Okay. All right. Let's go to folks in the room first. If you have a comment to make on this Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment if you could raise your hand, please, and you will be recognized for up to three minutes. Commissioner Beck, please. Beck: And you are the vice -- what did they call you? Strader: I'm the City Council Vice-president. Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 8 of 12 Beck: Vice-president. Okay. Madam Vice-President, Members of the Council -- Strader: Go ahead. Beck: -- appreciate being here with you and I appreciate your positive consideration of the -- this text amendment to -- to get this kicked off. The county adopted the impact fees in August for the -- for the unincorporated areas and, then, one city is already done. Other cities are well underway and so we would -- we would thank you very much for your consideration and we would ask you to -- if you could get the ordinance ready to go, because after the -- or after you pass the ordinance it can't be impacted until 30 days after, you know, so we would appreciate that and we thanks -- thanks a lot for bringing this up and hopefully you will get it passed. Thank you. Strader: Thank you so much. Just a moment in case we have any questions. Okay. Beck: Okay. Strader: No questions, but we thank you so much for being here. Appreciate it. Okay. are there any others here in the room who would like to provide public comment on this item? Okay. Seeing none. Mr. Clerk, do you have anyone signed up online? Johnson: Madam Vice-President, no. Strader: Okay. All right. Great. Well, I think now would be a good time. Motions, discussion, all of those things are in order. Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: Seeing no other public input, I move to close the public hearing. Whitlock: Second. Strader: Have a motion and a second to close public hearing. All those in favor, please, signify by saying aye. Okay. That is unanimous and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FOURAYES. TWOABSENT. Overton: Madam Vice-President. Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: Just brief comments. Allow others to do the same. This has obviously been something that's been discussed and worked on for many many months. It's bringing consistency with our county across the entire county on all the different city agencies Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 9 of 12 and this is not an approval of part of our Comprehensive Plan, it substantially changes how Meridian does business. We are not -- we not trying to make a huge change to what Meridian does, we are adopting what Ada county is doing and bringing that in line with our Comprehensive Plan, so that we have our plan updated. I think that also the text amendments we have made to make things a little more consistent and easier to read and easier to understand are also very good to have it all done at the same time and I have no issues with this moving forward. Strader: Okay. Is there further discussion or a motion? Overton: Madam Vice-President. Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: Seeing no other comments, after considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File No. H-2025-0045 as presented in the staff report during the hearing date of November 18th, 2025. Whitlock: Second. Strader: Okay. We have a motion and a second to approve the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment, H-2025-0045. Mr. Clerk, if you will, please, do a roll call vote. Roll Call: Cavener, absent; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, absent; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Strader: Okay. All ayes and the motion is approved. Congratulations. Thank you so much for being here. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. ORDINANCES [Action Item] 13. Ordinance No. 25-2101: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-11 Concerning Drive-Through Establishments; and Providing an Effective Date Strader: With that we will move on to our ordinances. First up is Ordinance No. 25- 2101 and we will recognize Mr. Hood for brief comments if needed. Okay. Do we need to read this ordinance by title? Johnson: Yes. Sorry. That's the process. I'm sorry. Strader: No worries. Thank you. Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 10 of 12 Johnson: Thank you, Madam Vice-President. This is an ordinance amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-11 concerning drive-through establishments and providing an effective date. Strader: Okay. We have now heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anyone who would like it read in its entirety? Okay. Not hearing anyone wanting that. With that we will go ahead and open this up for -- as an action item. Taylor: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2101. Strader: Okay. Whitlock: Second. Strader: We have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance 25-2101. Is there any discussion? I would like to provide a brief discussion. So, I do have some concerns, because I -- I had -- I did watch the public hearing from October 14th, so I'm up to speed on that. I was hoping that we would go a little bit farther regarding drive-throughs in Old Town specifically, but at the same time having thought about it I don't want the perfect to be the enemy of the good and I think overall these changes are broadly moving us forward in a positive direction. So, I will be voting in favor of this item. Okay. Is there further discussion? Mr. Hood. Hood: Madam Vice-Chair, I know you gave me an opportunity at the beginning before the clerk read the ordinance, but just a comment on your comment. We do have some additional tweaks and changes. So, this is sort of a holding ordinance. We got some more feedback, so here ballpark two, three months'ish we should have another public hearing and potential ordinance to tweak some of the tiers of the drive-throughs and Old Town is also back on the table for some discussion. So, I don't know if there will be changes that will come forth out of that discussion with the UDC focus group, but we are going to be reevaluating this. Even though you are adopting an ordinance tonight it will likely be short lived in its implementation. Strader: Thank you. Okay. Is there any further discussion? Okay. With that I believe we had a motion and a second as well. So, Mr. Clerk, if you could, please, call roll on that for a vote. Roll Call: Cavener, absent; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, absent; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Strader: Okay. All ayes and the ordinance is approved. Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 11 of 12 MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. 14. Ordinance No. 25-2102: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-12, Concerning Accessory Dwellings; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Next up we have Ordinance No. 25-2102. Mr. Clerk, if you could read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Madam Vice-President. This is an ordinance amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-12 concerning accessory dwelling units and providing an effective date. Strader: Okay. You have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anyone that would like it read in its entirety? Seeing no one wanting it read in its entirety, we will go ahead and open this up for motions or discussion. Taylor: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2102. Whitlock: Second. Strader: Okay. We have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2102. Is there any discussion? Hearing none, Mr. Clerk, would you go ahead and do a roll call vote on this. Roll Call: Cavener, absent; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, absent; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Strader: Okay. And the ordinance is approved. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Strader: With that we are on to Future Meeting Topics. Does anyone have a burning future meeting topic tonight? Okay. Hearing no future meeting topics, I will entertain a motion to adjourn. Overton: Madam Vice-President, I move that we adjourn. Whitlock: Second. Meridian City Council November 18,2025 Page 12 of 12 Strader: Okay. We have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting and we are adjourned. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:25 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) VICE-PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the November 5, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session November 5,2025 Page 36 of 36 Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: I would move that we approve Agenda Item No. 20, the Meridian Youth Baseball Softball partnership agreement as presented. Cavener: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Meridian Youth Baseball Softball Partnership Agreement. Is there discussion on the motion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agreement is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. White: Thank you guys very much. Appreciate it. Little Roberts: Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, we have reached the end of our meeting. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move that we adjourn the work session. Simison: Motion to adjourn the work session. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.05 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 11 / 18 / 25 MAYGIR oGBERT SA1+1GS(GD�' DATE APPROVED By Luke Cavener, Council President ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the November 5, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council November 5,2025 Page 6 of 6 Cavener: One quick item. As we are all aware the voters of Meridian approved the public safety levy last night. I would like to get on our agenda, either in December or maybe early January, before we move into base budget meetings, maybe a future meeting topic about how those dollars will be displayed in our budget, how they will be shown in terms of allocation. Just -- we have never been down this path before and I think before we start getting into budget season to have a good understanding about how the citizens of Meridian will be able to see how those dollars are collected and applied. Simison: All right. Anything else? Cavener: Nope. Simison: Then with that do I have a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn. Overton: Second. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.22 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 11 / 18 / 25. MAYOR Cfrl STIVTIJl7'r DATEAPPROVED By Luke Cavener, Council President ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Calkins Creek Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT- 205-0154) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-076826 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:44:43 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivision Name: Calkins Creek Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number:01 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. ESMT-2025-0154 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 18th day of November 20 25 between C11 Rustler, LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. T O HAVE AND T O HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports. sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: —6:2!;; — STATE OF IDAHO } ss County of Ada } This record was acknowledged before me on ft,&ffiW*ft by TMId f12WIR (name of individual), [complete the following ifsigning in a representative capacit oi• strike the fallowing {frigning in an individual capaeityj on behalf of C. f . (name of entit on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: 1fI111 (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Nolan Stamp Bclm Stefanie U Aragon C.omminion#69079 NOTARY P11BUC Notary 4ature"�� STATE OF IDAHO %''f OMMISSION EXPIRES 12J28r1078 My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01;`01?2024 CITY OF MERIDIAN ___________________________________ Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 ___________________________________ Attest: By Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk, respectively. _____________________________________ Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 I2 C= ro DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC. EXHIBIT A The following describes a parcel of land for the purpose of a Water Main and Sewer Easement being a portion of the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 26, Township 3 North Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin marking the Northwest corner of the NE1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 26 (W1/16 corner), said corner bears N 89007'48"W a distance of 1327.46 feet from a found Brass Cap stamped"PLS 12087" marking the Northeast corner of the NE1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 26 (N1/4 corner); Thence, leaving the W1/16 corner and along the West line of the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 26, S 0003024" W, a distance of 25.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin with No Cap marking a point on the South Right of Way line of Victory Road; Thence, continuing along said West line of the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 26, S 00°30'24" W, a distance of 559.47 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin with No Cap; Thence, leaving said West line of the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 26, S 89008'01" E, a distance of 595.26 feet to a found 5/8-inch diameter iron pin with No Cap marking a point on the West Right of Way line of Rustler Place; Thence, along the West Right of Way line of Rustler Place, N 01031'57" E, a distance of 188.39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence, leaving said West Right of Way line of Rustler Place, N 43023'18" W, a distance of 23.71 feet; Thence, N 79029'39"W, a distance of 229.35 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve left; Thence, along said curve to the left having a radius of 25.00 feet, and a central angle of 50023'40" an arc length of 21.99 feet with a chord bearing of S 750 18'31"W, and a chord distance of 21.29 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right; Thence, along said reverse curve to the right having a radius of 55.00 feet, and a central angle of 280047"9" an arc length of 269.54 feet with a chord bearing of N 1003021" E, and a chord distance of 70.13 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left; Thence, along said curve to the left having a radius of 25.00 feet, and a central angle of 5002340" an arc length of 21.99 feet with a chord bearing of S 540 17'49" E, and a chord distance of 21.29 feet; Thence, S 79029'39" E, a distance of 215.63 feet; Thence, N 54016'16" E, a distance of 27.88 feet to the West Right of Way line of said Rustler Place; 9175 West Black Eagle Drive Boise Idaho 83709 Telephone: 208.900.9049 Facsimile: 503.223.2701 M M � a DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC. Thence, along the West Right of Way line of said Rustler Place, S 01 031'57" W, a distance of 87.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 22,945 square feet or 0.53 acres, more or less. L ��S it T 32 ?'Cm OFof to��Q-� �Ra7 - EXHIBIT B � � S II Av � II S79'2939"e 21 .63 ti 229.35 m Y n W o N, L cc 7T 2 � 3a ZS RD A. 1425 -Watermain and Sewer Easement 10/30/2025 Scale: 1 inch= 50 feet File: 1425 Water Main and Sewer Esmt.ndp Tract 1:0.5268 Acres(22946 Sq.Feet),Closure:n33.2958w 0.01 ft.(1/94224),Perimeter=897 ft. 01 n43.2318w 23.71 08 s01.3157w 87.18 02 n79.2939w 229.35 03 Lt,r=25.00,delta=050.2340,arc=21.99,chord=s75.1831w 21.29 04 Rt,r=55.00,delta=280.4719,arc=269.54,chord=n10.3021e 70.13 05 Lt,r=25.00,delta=050.2340,arc=21.99,chord=s54.1749e 21.29 06 s79.2939e 215.63 07 n54.1616e 27.88 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Multi-Tenant Retail Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0151) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-076821 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:44:43 PM Project Name Or Subdivision Name: CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Pro 1 Electronically Recorded Multi Tenant Retail I Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only ESMT-2025-0151 Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 18th day of November 20 25. between Cortona Way Retail, LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); I r WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; C i NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: { (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities,together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after f making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed therein violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings,trash enclosures, carports, sheds,fences..trees,or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and f easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any i Water Main Easement Page I Version 01/01/2024 I i i f i I public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. I THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and j possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. I � SQL GRANTOR: /+�iOY40 na. VIA I�f a l � L�r✓ i i i STATE OF IDAHO ) r ss County of Ada ) 4 This record was acknowledged before me on II— - O;5(date) by C C (name of individual), [complete the following ij signing in a representaAe capacity, or strike the following Zf signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Coy-4 ohoLuJM Re�-a��, LLG (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following repr sentative capacity: Kaytaq-e ' (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below I LILLIAN R TABOR COMMISSION#30210 NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Signature STATE OF IDAHO My Commission Expires: i Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 i CITY OF MERIDIAN ___________________________________ Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 ___________________________________ Attest: By Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk, respectively. _____________________________________ Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 l' I 1 krn E N G I N E E R I N G September 24,2025 Project No.25-017 City of Meridian Water Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Water Easement being a portion of Lot 14, Block 12,of the Amended Plat of Verona Subdivision No.4(Book 102 of Plats, Pages 13476-13477),situated in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 26,Township 4 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Southwest corner of said Section 26,which bears N88.58'42"W a distance of 2,602.83 feet from a found brass cap marking the South 1/4 corner of said Section 26,thence following the southerly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4,S88°58'42"E a distance of 997.55 feet; Thence leaving said southerly line, N01°01'18"E a distance of 65.02 feet to a found 1/2-inch rebar on westerly right-of-way of N.Cortona Way; Thence following said westerly right-of-way, N01°00'33"E a distance of 7.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said westerly right-of-way, N89°02'36"W a distance of 17.52 feet; Thence N01°01'08"E a distance of 24.51 feet; Thence S88°59'27"E a distance of 17.52 feet to said westerly right-of-way; Thence following said westerly right-of-way,S01°00'33"W a distance of 24.49 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 429 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \Q, pKL L AN,0 0��5 CENSFD a o 6 9rf. OF 0 e7<< HYNS�� 9/Z�12025 5725 North Discovery Way• Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939• kmengllp.com P:\25-017\SURVEY\CAD\EXHIBITS\25-017 WATER EASEMENT 09.24.2025.DWG,KOBE ZIMMERMAN,9/24/2025,DWG TO PDF.PC3,08.5X11 L[PDF) W N ( I I r M cn w-o w N I M u' Z zmo N 0 CD�n nO ' O� Zm m z C N O D 0 0 0 �m I M 0 cn c r c c c p < � m z o z z z z rD U Z m y c o 0 0 —I rD aj Z � � n r A \ C D rD 'a fD z r c N K (n D rD z m m m o c (AC tZ m m > n i D � o - � � O I m [-A v z Coo CD C) � co CO 0 0 00 N fl] C C)co0 U) co � PQ C cn o�� W rD N aC u, z CD N r+ ao I 0 n o-n -v w W �ON_ <� r- CD �� C:)ml SON n 00 < o Ln ;b y �-U m z Z7ZN NOM N 000z CO � II Q L' j 01 O � C)N z -P� O IN(TIE) 0 � O 0 .rrl q j N W OLnm65.0 N01'01'18"E � I [ o I -4z 2 N 0 40 Ip caO -zl c(DO cn\ cn n-P N W o W I W C-) I rI m � z� m c� N m w Z N. Cortona Wa M M Ln z Y z N O1 i T Ln pD m .. Exhibit B 3 z oA- City of Meridian Water Easement N O 2 z O v oa o w 0 0 rn T m i a A a F A portion of Lot 14, Block 12,Amended Plat of Verona Sub. No.4,situated in the m ^z o o SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 26,T.4N., R.1W.,B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, ID I i I, s88°59'27"e 17.52 i I i t it I I i I i m 3 CO CO N O N C ) I l 17.52 i n89"02'36"w I 9/24/2025 f Scale: 1 inch= 5 feet File: Tract 1:0.0099 Acres(429 Sq.Feet),Closure:s47.3351w 0.01 ft.(1/14642),Perimeter-84 ft. 01 n89.0236w 17.52 02 n01.0108e 24.51 j 03 s88.5927e 17.52 04 s01.0033w 24.49 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Multi-Tenant Retail Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025- 0152) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-076822 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:44:43 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivision Name: Multi Tenant Retail i Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only ES'MT-2025-0152 Record Number: SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made thisl8th day of November 20 25 between Cortona Way Retail, LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); t I WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through j underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS it will be necessaryto maintain and service said pipelines from time to time b pp Y the Grantee; I I NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of fk sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) j The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. I T O HAVE AND T O HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. i IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. i I Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page I Version 0 1/0 1/2024 I l THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not lace or allow to be g p placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: 0040yla, v(a� I�PiI'a�I, Lc116 f t STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) C i This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by DPI ayx L a.c D VI (name of individual), [complete the following ifsigning in a representative capacity, or strike the following ifsigning in an individual capacity] on ov behalf of Cur� a Wog./?,0,61.I.LC�name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: aY\O Q er (type of authority such as officer or trustee) j Notary Stamp Below i LILLIAN R TABOR rfAA, A1-­1 ' 4 COMMISSION#30210 NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Signature STATE OF IDAHO My Commission Expires: f j Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 I CITY OF MERIDIAN ___________________________________ Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 ___________________________________ Attest: By Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk, respectively. _____________________________________ Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 i km E N G I N E E R I N G September 24,2025 Project No.25-017 City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement being a portion of Lot 14, Block 12,of the Amended Plat of Verona Subdivision No.4(Book 102 of Plats,Pages 13476-13477),situated in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 26,Township 4 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Southwest corner of said Section 26,which bears N88°58'42"W a distance of 2,602.83 feet from a found brass cap marking the South 1/4 corner of said Section 26,thence following the southerly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4,S88°58'42"E a distance of 762.98 feet,- Thence leaving said southerly line, N01°01'18"E a distance of 29.69 feet to the northerly right-of-way of W. McMillan Road and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence N01°29'45"E a distance of 48.66 feet; Thence N88°49'34"W a distance of 103.50 feet to the westerly boundary of Parcel 1 as described in Special Warranty Deed per Instrument No.2025-013985; Thence following said westerly boundary,N00°00'10"E a distance of 36.91 feet; Thence leaving said westerly boundary,S89°59'50"E a distance of 22.12 feet; Thence S00°00'33"W a distance of 17.36 feet; Thence 588°49'34"E a distance of 101.90 feet; Thence S01°29'45"W a distance of 36.16 feet; Thence S88°30'15"E a distance of 12.00 feet; Thence S01°29'45"W a distance of 32.62 feet to said northerly right-of-way; Thence following said northerly right-of-way,N88°30'15"W a distance of 32.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 4,220 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of- way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \aNpL LANDS ow�5 \CENSFD G�� � o a un �o qTF OF \�P HOS 9 Zit 2ca5 5725 North Discovery Way• Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939• kmengllp.com P:\25-017\SURVEY\CAD\EXHIBIT5\25-017 SEWER-WATER EASEMENT 09.24.2025.DWG,KOBE ZIMMERMAN,9/24/2025,DWG TO PDF.PC3,08.5X11 L[PDF] I m G) ncg mZm0� oI II N II f?O..s 0y'pdc OF8�p I� ZmL 0III IIII z n❑ QmzO ®�z�nz m ONN o o zm mz n W m m 0 TI -n -1 C m Doa 00 0M 0 0Cr C C C < r N00'00'10"E z z >o n m - - m 7048.1 D' . m D mmzm 0 0 �! D CID Ic zI I O CD WO m Q 00 W 00 LD co I I 00 co o I I� 0 (D �pN =CnI IW Q - —•�1 ITi I [ND O cc CD -P _0 (D _I I� D rD 'Cl o � 10 z: N ^_I Op Z N 20' Q z O z Q w I (o z N I I I o CD z (D N01'29'45"E 48.66' I 0 O n --- --� fj z I O C O I 00 N � 00 00 N O ( N O y r- LUr+ ni o _32.62' J� AOypC� t7 00 ( I L4 S01'29'45"W Iv co 0) o s A/�- (D C I00 W O W 0) 1,0_r 41 �P/ (i I 1.0� M� n � o C:) 00 A zz 9 rn M uWi �S�OF ti0 v Iv ��F� rn 0 0 m Ln = D Z m ° m Exhibit B z° 1p- City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement p z 0 v, I F 0 0 TI v w 0 m m 3 A o A portion of Lot 14, Block 12,Amended Plat of Verona Sub. No.4,situated in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 26,T.4N., R.1W., B.M., City of Meridian,Ada County, ID l I i i i i I s89°59'50"e 22.12 3 M m M o I �o �o 0 � N I s88°49'34"e o m 101.9 o M 0 c I 3 I 11188'30'15"e 0 103.5n88'49'34"w 12 :n Cv co C N CO O � C tf7 I N V I N N O I f 3Z n88°30'15"w f f i I I I f 9/24/2025 Scale: 1 inch= 20 feet File: k Tract 1:0.0969 Acres(4220 Sq.Feet), Closure:n05.4629w 0.01 ft.(1147149),Perimeter=443 ft. 01 n01.2945e 48.66 08 s88.3015e 12 02 n88.4934w 103.5 09 s01.2945w 32.62 03 n00.0010e 36.91 10 n88.3015w 32 04 s89.5950e 22.12 05 s00.0033w 17.36 06 s88.4934e 101.9 07 s012945w 36.16 i I I E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Multi-Tenant Retail Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2025-0153) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-076823 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:44:43 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Electronically Recorded Multi Tenant Retail i Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only ESMT-2025-0153 Record Number: SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 18thday of November 20 25 between Cortona Way Retail, LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); i WHEREAS,the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and I WHEREAS,the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of- I way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over and across the following f described property: I (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) I�I The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. i THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with j Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees,or deep-rooted shrubs. i I t I i Sanitary Sewer Easement Page I Version 01/01/2024 I I I� 1 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. i THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful I right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives, purchasers,or transferees ofany kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: tnJGl�1 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) i 1- f This record was acknowledged before me on It- -Z.02�(date) by �V oY1 CY1QGa 1'1 (name of individual), [complete the following ij signing in a representatA capacity, or strike the following if signing in an intlividual capacity] on behalf of Gpr loym W a4 Rekdl , LI.G (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Ok.ALLAe.Y' (type of authority such as officer or trustee) i f Notary Stamp Below LILLIAN R TABOR Notary Signature COMMISSION#30210 NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: Dg-,X-.;2030 STATE OF IDAHO i it i I l f I I I Sanitary Sewer Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 i CITY OF MERIDIAN ___________________________________ Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 ___________________________________ Attest: By Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk, respectively. _____________________________________ Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 i i kmI E N G I N E E R I N G I September 24,2025 Project No.25-017 Sewer Line Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a Sewer Line Easement being a portion of Lot 14,Block 12,of the Amended Plat of Verona Subdivision No.4(Book 102 of Plats,Pages 13476-13477),situated in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 26,Township 4 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the Southwest corner of said Section 26,which bears N88°58'42"W a distance of 2,602.83 feet from a found brass cap marking the South 1/4 corner of said Section 26,thence following the southerly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4,S88°58'42"E a distance of 825.07 feet; Thence leaving said southerly line,N01°01'18"E a distance of 29.17 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar marking the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 as described in Special Warranty Deed per Instrument No.2025-013985; Thence following the easterly boundary of said Parcel 1, N00°00'10"E a distance of 55.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said easterly boundary,S45°00'00"W a distance of 41.61 feet; Thence N01°29'45"E a distance of 6.96 feet; Thence N88°30'15"W a distance of 7.18 feet; Thence N45°00'00"E a distance of 47.19 feet; Thence N90°00'00"E a distance of3.05 feet to said easterly boundary; Thence following said easterly boundary,S00°00'10"W a distance of 11.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 436 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \,fir E N SF. G F ..c CL 6 9lF OF \`) << WAS 2 20ID 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939 • kmengilp.com P:\25-017\SURVEY\CAD\EXHIBITS\25-017 SEWER EASEMENT 09.24.2025.DWG,KOBE ZIMMERMAN,9/24/2025,DWG TO PDF.PC3,08.5X11 L[PDF] i W N ^M (n 7�0' rna, m C z zrn 13 cn (-) ZM I o zrn z rn 0 rD -v v' "' �' o M I fD nj c m o a 0 0 M (D n < � m z n z z z z (D O m 0 C 0 0 0 —i Z rn r- ---Io C D D C) -�ZI (D r m m z m C z�I m O oz CD z mD rCOv ° p O D I n Io �0 k NJ D .� �0 I p-C p � mrn I NN � nCi D 0 , C cn zz p �(—Dl1UiI -Z IX �� I r 00 .0 � 41(n_— _ (7 [n o I �ONI Z M flJ CO I V I p :CJ O rn C0 Z N N � O � J �� I Q (I! -- \ \OO, z o o \ \OO., o i v m pO O.\ \ �O � o O N00.00'10"E 55.85' oW (n �OIn �Lo o fD z I� z _o N z� o II IGi� o� LU i M� omo U)M o 0o zz, o ZZ D0(n C N 0 rn� Woo Norn CO N Z ;r' O N O li m to A n �Z m Exhibit B =�Zci M z°°- Sewer Easement T I 3 'm �.. o=Z p°0>gm O -n v 8 W.o m m 3 � A i-' m A portion of Lot 14, Block 12,Amended Plat of Verona Sub. No.4,situated in the K Z a o SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 26,T.4N., R.1W., B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, ID v N k i I I I i i 5 i 3 0 �o ro �o I 0 N I I I � I 0000 � cRh tK I R� 00 h 5R I i f it 7.18 n88°30'15"w tf1 V O T� N� O C i I l 9/24/2025 F Scale: 1 inch= 10 feet File: Tract 1:0.0100 Acres(436 Sq.Feet),Closure:n04.3700e 0.01 ft.(1112565),Perimeter=117 ft. 01 s45.0000w 41.61 02 n01.2945e 6.96 03 n88.3015w 7.18 04 n45.0000e 47.19 05 n90.0000e 3.05 06 s00.0010w 11.1 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Southridge South Subdivision Phase 1 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT- 2025-0139) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-076824 Project Nara€or.Subdivision Narne: Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:44:43 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Southridge South Phase 1 Electronically Recorded For internal Use Only ESMT-2025-0139 Record Number: PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this18th day of November 20 25 between Challenger development Inc. ("Grantor")and the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows; THE GRANTOR,does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property,. described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incolporated herein. i I THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. ' TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings; trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or shrubs. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page I Version 01/01/2024 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: C er Develo ent I c STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County ofAda ) This record was acknowledged before me on AeZ wivl5 (date) by D/ r1b✓� (name of individual), [confplete the following l signing in a representativ4cap city, or strike thefollowing f signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of e(name of entity o behalf of whom record was executed), in the followpresentative capacity: �rCSld en'F (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below I _ Notary Signature ADAIR KOLTES My Commission Expires: t?, 0 � Notary Public - State of Idaho Commission Number 30052 My Commission Expires 06-05-2028 I� I I Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 2 Version 01 /01 /2024 I CITY OF MERIDIAN ___________________________________ Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 ___________________________________ Attest: By Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk, respectively. _____________________________________ Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 g� LEGAL DESCRIPTION W! ifi/ereWA T Page 1 of 2 HE ri I Moe LAND GROUP Date: July 12, 2023 Project No . : 121027 EXHIBIT A SOUTHRIDGE SOUTH SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 PATHWAY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION An easement located in the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the Northwest Corner of Section 23 of said Township 3 North, Range 1 West, (from which point the North One Quarter Corner of said Section 23 bears South 89014' 56" East, 2652 , 36 feet distant); Thence from said Northwest Corner of Section 23, South 60° 44' 10" East, a distance of 1752 .06 feet to a point on the easterly right of way line of West Overland Road, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 850 01' 59" East, a distance of 12,39 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 6,77 feet on the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 35 ,00 feet, a central angle of 110 04' 43", and whose chord bears South 790 29' 38" East, a distance of 6 , 76 feet to a point of non-tangent compound curvature; Thence 33 ,60 feet on the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 35 .00 feet, a central angle of 550 00, 00", and whose chord bears North 78' 32 ' 43" East, a distance of 32 . 32 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Thence 142 ,58 feet on the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 220.00 feet, a central angle of 370 07' 58", and whose chord bears North 69° 36' 42" East, a distance of 140. 10 feet to a point of compound curvature; Thence 163 .30 feet on the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 335 ,00 feet, a central angle of 270 55' 48", and whose chord bears South 75° 26' 57" East, a distance of 161 . 69 feet; Thence South 610 29' 03 " East, a distance of 227 .43 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 19 .57 feet on the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 440.00 feet, a central angle of 02' 32' 56", and whose chord bears South 620 45' 31 " East, a distance of 19 , 57 feet; Thence South 64° 01' 59" East, a distance of 30,51 feet; Thence South 64' 01' 59" East, a distance of 17 ,03 feet; Thence South 250 58' 01" West, a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence North 64° 01' 59" West, a distance of 57 .77 feet; Thence North 610 29' 03" West, a distance of 237 . 66 feet to a point of curvature; Thence 153 , 13 feet on the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 315.00 feet, a central angle of 270 51' 10", and whose chord bears North 75° 24' 39 " West, a distance of 151. 63 feet to a point of compound curvature; Thence 138 . 10 feet on the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 196,80 feet, a central angle of 40' 12' 24", and whose chord bears South 68° 40' 20" West, a distance of 135 ,29 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Thence 44.23 feet on the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 55 ,00 feet, a central angle of 46' 04' 25", and whose chord bears South 83° 00' 31" West, a distance of 43 .05 feet; 462 East Shore Drive, Suite 100 , Eagle, Idaho 83616 208 .939.4041 thelandgroupinc .com Page 2 of 2 Thence North 83° 38' 38" West, a distance of 18 .75 feet; Thence North 140 53' 23" East, a distance of 20 , 13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . PREPARED BY: The Land Group, Inc. L LAAr4D a 7880 w 7-12-2023 sT �o OF ����Pqv�� James R. Washburn R. WAy�' I i 462 East Shore Drive, Suite 100 , Eagle, Idaho 83616 208.939.4041 thelandgroupino, com Fb LanL Med y31OX ma\m OalePlotlX: WdnestlIa1 y1,0JPuTryo 1a2QN0ww a\M0thiah1X sP\Mt2104] can paNway easemeM2]0]11 Mp r y y z jV OR m N OR W r y P w N o N a D �p CD N A z cr a �� d Nco • n' Lam' m A m :+ O Z CO uj 2I0 / 0 O� o I �yV CJ /�O C i C r G W °' w O > G r m wA M o 11 m a � 0 11 zv G o I > Iz � e o 11 � a c _ _ = D , /� x � A o a gX CO - m ® /A ion o � � _ _ _ _ > B � � 0 9 A < B 9 m m ti a i c� / B m y C) x B B m A r p N � z � o A 0 o w m � w Pathway Easemen"L"! "A 040 TC ®. City of Meridian '' LAN Challenger DeveO © �(jrr� mu"( v Dncgo _ G ° 0 H ° v IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Village at Meridian Phase 2B Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0146) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-076825 Boise,Idaho Pgs=7 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:44:43 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivision Name: Village at Meridian-Phase 213 Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequenrial numher if;he prel"t contains pure than one ea rvcflt of this type-See for additional informition, For Internal Use Only Record Number: ESMT-2025-0146 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made thisl 8th day of November 20 25 between MERIDIAN CENTERCAL LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and set-vice said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. T O HAVE AND T O HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page t Version 01/01/2024 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become mill and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished . THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land , and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: MERIDIAN CENTERCAL LLC STAT OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) 5�6� This record was acknowledged before me on (name of individual), [complete the . g r signing in a representative capacity, or strike thefollowing i s 'grain' in an individual capacity] on behalf of � o entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following r•epr rve capacity: (type of authority such as offices ustee) Notary Stamp ,r v Notary Signature My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01 /01 /2024 CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 tilo-J, iitm' 3ii3,53,*ite�4itftr<n4NfiOMIO: '#9 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the Individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California 1 County of LoS ArtQQxV, L Es 1} On pcqi o 3EQ 2E7 before me, %` I �oC RiZ �I�u Bu.C. Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared PO�No", V L b%,) Nome(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the KAi HLEEN DONLON laws of the State of California that the foregoing Notary Public • CaHtcrnia �" = Los Angeles county paragraph is true and correct. Commission 4 t572576 ray Comm. Expires Sep ts, to2v + WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signat Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above ignature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing: 02019 National Notary Association CITY OF MERIDIAN ___________________________________ Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 ___________________________________ Attest: By Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on _11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk, respectively. _____________________________________ Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 `� LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 �►� T H E Page 1 of 3 ! r LAN D GROUP October 30, 2025 Project No.: 124038 SEWER/WATER EASEMENTS CENTERCAL EXPANSION SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN CENTERCAL, LLC EASEMENT-1 An easement located in Parcel "B" of Record of Survey No.13558, recorded under Instrument No.2022- 068728,Ada County records, situate in the Southwest Quarter of Section 4,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of said Section 4, (from which point the West One Quarter Corner of said Section 4 bears North 00° 34' 03" East, 2618.49 feet distant);thence on the west line of said Section 4, North 00'34' 03" East, 523.91 feet;thence leaving said west line, South 89' 25' 57" East, 225.55 feet,to the POINT OF BEGINNING of EASEMENT-1: Thence North 00' 23' 20" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 89°36'40" East, 32.17 feet; Thence North 00' 23' 20" East, 7.00 feet; Thence South 89°36'40" East, 75.61 feet; Thence North 00' 23' 20" East, 11.46 feet; Thence South 89°36'40" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00° 23' 20" West, 11.46 feet; Thence South 89°36'40" East, 89.39 feet, to a point on an existing sewer and water easement, recorded as Instrument No. 112079721, Ada County records; Thence on said existing sewer and water easement, South 00° 23' 20" West, 30.00 feet; Thence leaving said existing sewer and water easement, North 89° 36' 40" West, 140.00 feet,to a point on said existing sewer and water easement; Thence on said existing sewer and water easement, North 00'23' 20" East, 7.00 feet; Thence North 89' 36'40" West,45.00 feet; Thence South 00° 23' 20" West,4.00 feet; Thence leaving said existing sewer and water easement, North 89° 36' 40" West, 32.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of EASEMENT-1. The above-described easement-1 contains 6,108 Ft'(0.140 Acres) more or less. TOGETHER WITH EASEMENT-2 An easement located in Parcel "B" of Record of Survey No.13558, recorded under Instrument No.2022- 068728,Ada County records, situate in the Southwest Quarter of Section 4,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: 462 East Shore Drive, Suite 100, Eagle, Idaho 83616 208.939.4041 thelandgroupinc.com October 30, 2025 Page 2 COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of said Section 4, (from which point the West One Quarter Corner of said Section 4 bears North 00° 34' 03" East, 2618.49 feet distant); thence on the west line of said Section 4, North 00°34' 03" East, 855.91 feet; thence leaving said west line,South 89° 25' 57" East, 509.26 feet,to the POINT OF BEGINNING of EASEMENT-2: Thence North 00' 23' 20" East, 26.81 feet, to a point on an existing sewer and water easement, recorded as Instrument No. 112079721, Ada County records; Thence on said existing sewer and water easement, South 89° 36'40" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving existing sewer and water easement, South 00° 23' 20" West, 26.81 feet; Thence North 89' 36'40" West, 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of EASEMENT-2. The above-described easement-2 contains 536 Ft' (0.012 Acres) more or less. TOGETHER WITH EASEMENT-3 An easement located in Parcel "B" of Record of Survey No.13558, recorded under Instrument No.2022- 068728,Ada County records, situate in the Southwest Quarter of Section 4,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of said Section 4, (from which point the South One Quarter Corner of said Section 4 bears South 89°22' 57" East, 2659.38 feet distant); thence on the south line of said Section 4,South 89° 22' 57" East, 597.83 feet; thence leaving said south line, North 00° 37' 03" East, 546.60 feet,to a point on an existing sewer and water easement, recorded as Instrument No. 112079721, Ada County records AND the POINT OF BEGINNING of EASEMENT-3: Thence North 00' 23' 20" East, 17.46 feet; Thence South 89°36'40" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00° 23' 20" West, 17.46 feet,to a point on said existing sewer and water easement; Thence on said existing sewer and water easement, North 89° 36' 40" West, 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of EASEMENT-3. The above-described easement-3 contains 349 Ft' (0.008 Acres) more or less. Prepared by: �p,L LA The Land Group, Inc. �4 �\GE.N Michael S. Femenia, PLS o .4 P. 1 5 , T 4S 10/30/2025 Site Planning• Landscape Architecture•Civil Engineering•Surveying 462 E.Shore Drive,Suite 100• Eagle, Idaho 83616•P 208.939.4041•www.thelandgroupinc.com \ /�.� 0 %= T H E L AN D - GROUP I I II 1 II I I I I I I I II I CAI I I L------------------------------------------------------------------------------------J L-------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- i I I I I I I I I �- W1/4 SEC. 4 (BCP) I I I Sewer / Water Easements 'y L------------------------------- L8 '1? N I I I for T I I� i iz I I J z' cwnrn I cc Ow ��Y- _ _S89°25'57"E 509.26' L10 of POB-2 CD W EASEMENT-2 i I 1i n h W 1 4 f Section 4 0.012 Acres± Situate t e S / o Sect o _ I I I ' (536Ft2) ' Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho v I I PARCEL "B" i i 2025 R0S#13558 I I I I O I i i MERIDIAN CENTERCAL LLC ! i i �11AL LA APN:131343720710 W��� �'�CENS I I I � ' I I I I I , I I 1 FOF0 — RL S. I I I I I ; �----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CT) I I I O CC) o w o M I I o ch I I � - - I z cc -------------------------------------------------------------------- r ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------CD -- Line Table W I I ccI I LINE BEARING LENGTHCD ■� L1 N00°23'20"E 7.00' 1 OW ■� L2 N00°2320"E 11.46' C I I OI I CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER AND L3 S89°36'40"E 20.00' Rom WATER EASEMENT L4 S00°23'20"W 11.46' INST.#112079721 I I I , L5 N00°23'20"E 7.00' L6 S00°23'20"W 4.00' I0 I I L7 N00°2320"E 26.81' i L8 S89°36'40"E 20.00' LU I , L9 S00°23'20"W 26.81' y Q z I I I L10 N8936'40"W 20.00' 0 � ° z 1 EASEMENT-1 i EASEMENT-3 Revisions w N L11 S00°23'20"W 17.46' 0.140 Acres± i i a ¢ 0 0.008 Acres± L3 UJ (6,108 Ft2) I i T L12 (349 Ft2) L12 N89°36'40"W 20.00' 1 N I i CD M `n `_J "E 17.46, S89°36'40"E 75.61' J J S89°36'40"E 89.39' _ I I � M z J L13 N00°23'20 r 32.17' Li i " �---------------------------- ¢ J L14 S89°36'40"E 20.00, I N00°23'20"E S89°36'40"E CD L14 - --------� , C\J 20.00' 60 N o POB-3--- 9°36'40"W o N8 N89°36140"W S89 L5 °25'57"E 225.55' �/ 32.17' 1 L6 45.00' POB-1 _I I N89°36'40"W 140.00, I I I I I I 1 J I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I -4CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER AND ; — WATER EASEMENT I I j INST.#112079721 I I "Co rn I I I I co l cri I I I I I `� I I I I of I I a I I j I I o I I of a LO I I L_T———————————————————————————————————————————————————————L———___—___ —____—____—____——____—____—____—____——____—I____—____—____——___——____—____—_ I 1 I I I I 1 Project No.: 124038 3 SW COR. SEC. 4 (BCP) S1/4 SEC. 4 ALC Date of Issuance: October6,2025 ( ) Project Milestone: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 597.83' — _ _ 2061.55' S89°2257"E 2659.38'— — — — — — o 30' 60'Exhibit "B" E_ Horizontal Scale: 1" = 30' 1 of 1 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Centrepoint Apartments - Parcel E - H-2025-0009) Between City of Meridian and MGM Meridian LLC for Property Located at 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. Ada County Recorder Trent Trippie 2025-076810 Boise;Idaho, Pgs=33 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:24:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 " Electron'idally Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. PARTIES: " 1. City of Meridian - -2.MGM-Meridian LLC; Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(this "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of 4C.A4 ker,-,2025, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter.called"CITY,' whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642; and MGM Meridian LLC, whose address is 3130 Alpine Road Suite 288 -#708 Portola Valley, California 9402$, l 'hereinafter called"OWNER/DEVELOPER.', 1: RECITALS: 1,1 WHEREAS, Ownei/Developer is-the sole owner,in law andlor equity,of a certain tract of land in the County of Ada,State of Idaho, identified as Ada County Parcel #S1165110111 and described.in Exhibit"A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter refereed to as the " raperty,'° and 1.2 - WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides thafcities t aay,by ordinance,. establish provisions governing the creation, forth,recording,modification; enforcement and termination of development agreements required or permitted as a condition.of zoning that the Owner/Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the Property; and L3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of-the Unified Development Code.("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements and the modification of development agreements;and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer has submitted an application'for development agreement modification to remove the property listed in Exhibit"A" from an, - existing Development:Agreement(Centrepointe Mixed-Use MDA H=202 -0035) recorded in Ada County on September 14,2022 as Instrument#2022-079000, for the inclusion of-the Property into this new Agreement,which generally,describes . how the'Property will be developed and what improvements will be made, and 1.5 'WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the duly noticed public hearings before the;Meridian-City Council,as to how the property will be developed and what improvements will be trade; and D7 NIEI,bPMEl4'1'AGREEMENT-(i,lNTkEPOIN'I'Ai ARTMENT4 MDA-PARCEL E-I1=2025-0009 Page 1 of 8 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested development agreement modification held before the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 17th of June, 2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit "B;" and 1.8 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.9 WHEREAS, the property listed in Exhibit"A" shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreement (Centrepointe Mixed-Use MDA 11- 2022-0035) recorded in Ada County on September 14, 2022 as Instrument#2022- 079000 and shall be bound by the terms contained herein in this new agreement; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement modification for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designations are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement, the following words, terms and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL E-H-2025-0009 Page 2 of 8 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to MGM Meridian LLC, whose address is 3130 Alpine Road Suite 288 - #708, Portola Valley, California 94028, the party that owns said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit"A" describing a parcel to be removed from an existing Development Agreement (Centrepointe Mixed-Use MDA H-2022-0035) recorded in Ada County on September 14, 2022 as Instrument #2022-079000,with such parcel being bound by this new Agreement, which Exhibit "A" is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed as permitted, conditional and/or accessory uses under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1 Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of the Property shall be substantially consistent with the submitted concept plan and color renderings included in Section VI of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit`B" and the provisions contained herein. b. Future development of the Property shall comply with the standards outlined in the multi-family development specific use standards, UDC 11-4-3-27. c. All future pedestrian crossings that traverse shared drive aisles within the development shall be constructed with brick,pavers, stamped concrete, or colored concrete to clearly delineate the driving surface from the pedestrian facilities,per UDC 11-3A-19B.4b. d. The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segment shall be constructed and vegetated with the residential phase of development along E. Ustick Road; the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the residential phase of development. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL E-H-2025-0009 Page 3 of 8 e. Owner/Developer shall work with Ada County Highway District(ACHD) to construct a safe pedestrian crossing from the central multi-family site area to the parking lot along the west boundary across N. Centrepoint Way. f. Pursuant to the approved Conditional Use Permit for the multi-family development, the building along the west boundary shall be no more than two stories in height, and the three (3)buildings within the center of the project shall be no more than three stories in height, consistent with the Owner/Developer's revised concept plan and presentation to City Council. g. Owner/Developer shall continue the masonry wall along the west property boundary consistent with adjacent development and help buffer the proposed project. h. Staff and Owner/Developer shall work with ACHD to mark Centrepoint Way as no parking on both sides, should ACHD allow it. i. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the adjacent Commercial Parcel (Parcel F), Ada County Parcel#S1105110120, and the Property, allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties, unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six(6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. In the event Owner/Developer, or Owner's Developer's heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default, which actions must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty(180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL E-H-2025-0009 Page 4 of 8 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall,upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code § 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to the City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity,performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion therefor in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinance of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements,which the Owner/Developer agrees to provide, if required by the City. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL E-H-2025-0009 Page 5 of 8 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued if the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the City, or if sufficient surety of performance has not been provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail,postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: MGM Meridian LLC 3130 Alpine Road Suite 288 -#708 Portola Valley, California 94028 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owner/Developer,to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, has determined that Owner/Developer has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL E-H-2025-0009 Page 6 of 8 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonable in giving any consent, approval, or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property ("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time,provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property, which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing the Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [End of text. Acknowledgements, signatures, and Exhibits A and B follow.] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL E-H-2025-0009 Page 7 of 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: MGM Meridian LLC By (print name):M (y q`( M^144.".. Its (title): K.t^Na ry 4r State of ) ss: County of ) On this day of 2025, fore me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared ,known or 'dentified to me to be the of MGM Meridian LLC and the person who signed above and acknowl ged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have her nto set my hand and affixe my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. - i i Expires: CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN By Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 Attest: By Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL E-H-2025-0009 Page 8 of 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of San Mateo ) On I���z`� before me, Jason Salazar, Notary Public - �m'' (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared ' KCILA.j A n" who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. *my JASOIISAL" WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary.Public-California SanMateo County Commission#2477259 Comm.Expires Dec 23,2027 Signature (Seal) PARCEL E LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, and is described as follows: PARCEL E: A parcel of land located in Government Lot 1 in the Northeast One Quarter of Section 5, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 5 of said Township 3 North, Range 1 East, (from which point the North Quarter Corner of said Section 5 bears South 89039'20" West, 2656.46 feet distant); Thence South 89039'20" West, a distance of 495.33 feet on the north line of said Section 5; Thence South 0100559" West, a distance of 41.45 feet to a point on the easterly boundary line of that Parcel as described in Warranty Deed Instrument Number 2017-094272 of Ada County Records, and on the southerly right-of-way line of East Ustick Road, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 010 05' 59" West, a distance of 302.81 feet on the exterior boundary line of said Warranty Deed parcel; Thence South 810 54' 00" East, a distance of 24.72 feet on the exterior boundary line of said Warranty Deed parcel; Thence South 840 06' 00" East, a distance of 253.73 feet on the exterior boundary line of said Warranty Deed parcel; Thence South 060 06' 00" West, a distance of 275.20 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary line of Bienville Square Subdivision, as same is shown on the Plat thereof, recorded in Book 102 of Plats at Page 13495 of Ada County Records; Thence North 830 54' 00" West, a distance of 311.81 feet on said Northerly boundary line; Thence North 710 28' 10" West, a distance of 803.90 feet on said Northerly boundary line to a point on the East boundary line of Carol's Subdivision No. 2, as same is shown on the Plat thereof, recorded in Book 39 of Plats at Page 3248 of Ada County Records; Thence North 000 15' 11" West, a distance of 305.79 feet on said East boundary line to a point on the Southerly right-of way line of East Ustick Road; Thence on said Southerly right-of-way line of East Ustick Road for the following courses and distances: Thence North 890 39' 20" East, a distance of 125.16 feet; Thence South 450 58' 35" East, a distance of 40.04 feet; Thence North 890 39' 20" East, a distance of 59.00 feet; Thence North 440 47' 01" East, a distance of 53.86 feet; Thence North 890 39' 20" East, a distance of 374.57 feet; Thence South 890 23' 16" East, a distance of 206.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that portion conveyed to Ada County Highway District by Warranty Deed recorded September 8, 2020 as Instrument No. 2020-116678, Records of Ada County, Idaho. APN: S1105110111 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CVIENty AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Development Agreement modification,by Mike Maffia,MGM2. Case No(s). H-2025-0009 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 3,2025 (Findings on June 17,2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3, 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance,established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -1- reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a Development Agreement modification is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner,and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two (2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -2- City Code Title I I(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted,including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10,seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d)and 67-8003,an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 17th day of June,2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert �on 6-17-2025 Att i f� p�['ilp of f j C E IDIAN'� „�ioauo SFAI. =frri <T� Chris JOhnsO 6-17-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: - Dated: 6-17-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA—H-2025-0009) -4- EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �E DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT HEARING April 22, 2025 continued to Legend DATE: May 13, June 3,2025 �7 Project Location Area of Impact TO: Mayor&City Council «= City Limits OAnalysis FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner F 208-884-5533 ��`' +1� lritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Mike Maffia,MGM2 oa � SUBJECT: H-2025-0009 Centrepoint Apartments MDA ' , LOCATION: 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. L Cajun Lane,located in the NE '/4 of -- Section 5,Township 3N,Range I _- (Parcel(s)# S 1105110111 and S1105110120) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project approval that was received in 2022 (H-2022-0072)with the modification to the existing Development Agreement(Instrument No. 2022-079000) for the existing 11.17 acres. The modification will create two(2)new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. B. Issues/Waivers In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project that was previously approved in 2022 (H-2022-0072). C. Recommendation Recommend approval of the proposed Development Agreement modification. D. Decision Approved with conditions City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1•Land Use Description Details Mal)Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-Family Residential and Commercial - Existing Zoning C-G VI.A.2 Proposed Zoning C-G Adopted FLUM Designation MU-R VI.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation MU-R Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 1/28/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 2/25/2025 Site posting date 4/3/2025 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Centrepoint Apartments MDA H-2025-0009 (copy this link into a separate browser). Table 3:Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2018-0121 (Villasport CUP,MDA);H-2021-0006(CUP),H-2022-0035 (MDA,DA Inst.#2022-079000);H-2024-0019(ALT,CUP,MDA)—this application was approved but the applicant terminated their entitlement rights;TED-2023-0002;TEC-2025-0001 Phasing Plan None Residential Units 213 multi-family units-One(1)two-story building and five(5)3-story buildings Open Space 6.78 acres(295,401 s.f.)of qualified open space proposed according to the open space exhibit(approximately 40%). Amenities At a minimum, 13 amenities are proposed—See the amenity Exhibit in Section VII below. Physical Features The Milk Lateral has previously been piped and there is a thirty(30)foot irrigation easement that goes through the property. Acreage 11.17 Lots 2 Density Gross—21.3 du/ac. City of Meridian Department Report IL Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject application encompasses two(2)parcels located south of E. Ustick Road(Parcels S 1105110111 and S 1105110120. Parcel S 1105110111 was part of a Development Agreement Modification and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)application in 2019 that removed the subject parcel from an existing Development Agreement(DA) for the purpose of entering into a new DA with a new conceptual plan and building elevations(H-2018-0121,DA Inst. #2019-060877)and a request for a new athletic club and spa(indoor recreation facility),Villasport. The CUP approval for the indoor recreation facility has since expired and the property was sold. The current CUP and DA(H-2022-0035 DA Inst#2022-079000)was approved to construct a mixed-use development consisting of commercial space and a 213-unit multi-family development in lieu of an athletic club/spa and commercial building. In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. B. Development Agreement Modification The applicant is requesting the following changes to the Development Agreement: • Parcel E(3100 Centrepoint Way) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments shall be constructed and vegetated with the residential phase of development along E.Ustick Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the residential phase—Parcel E of development. • Parcel F (3030 N. Cajun Lane) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway along N. Eagle Road will be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel—Parcel F. C. Staffs Analysis Staff has no objection to the Applicant's request for a modification to the existing development agreement(H-2021-0103,Inst. 92022-066859)to create two(2)new development agreements so that each parcel can develop independently. On December 3,2024,the City Council approved findings for H02024-0019 for modifications to the existing Development Agreement(DA)H-2022-0035 and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)H- 2022-0072 to facilitate the construction of a 239-unit multifamily affordable apartment project. This proposal strictly pertains to the residential component of the approved development plan. The applicant also requested alternative compliance for the to the open space and parking lot landscaping. In January of 2025,that applicant terminated the entitlements and withdrew their application for the Centrepoint Apartments project(H-2024-0019 ALT,CUP,MDA)due to complications at the State level with project financing. An administrative time extension(TED- 2023-0002)was approved for a two-year period in April of 2023. Prior to the expiration date of April 1,2025,the applicant submitted an application for an additional two-year During the review process for H-2024-0019,ITD required the applicant to dedicate twelve (12) feet of right-of-way on Eagle Road and reconstruct the right turn lane to Seville Lane. The current DA requires the landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments to be constructed and vegetated with the first phase of development along E.Ustick Road and N. Eagle Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the first phase of development. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis The applicant is proposing to create two development agreements for the following reasons: • To allow landscape street buffers and pathways along E.Ustick Road as well as the 25- foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries to be developed with the residential development on Parcel E. E. Ustiek Read are insta4led no later-gian a yeai-7 after-appr-&val of the development agfeement medifiea4ien as this is�he final fnissiiig 14+k leadiiig up to Eagle Read. • To allow the landscape buffer and pathway along N. Eagle Road to be constructed with the commercial development on Parcel F. Therefore,each parcel owner will be responsible for the improvements outlined in each of their development agreements. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. Development Agreement Modification(Parcel E—Multi-family): 1.1 The modified Development Agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council approval of the Findings. The Development Agreement shall,at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of the site shall be substantially consistent with the submitted concept plan and color renderings included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. Future development of Parcel E shall comply with the standards outlined in the multi-family development specific use standards,UDC 11-4-3-27. c. All future pedestrian crossings that traverse shared drive aisles within the development shall be constructed with brick,pavers, stamped concrete,or colored concrete to clearly delineate the driving surface from the pedestrian facilities,per UDC 11-3A-19B.4b. d. The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segment shall be constructed and vegetated with the€rrst residential phase of development along E. Ustick Road and N. Eagle R,,..a;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the&4 residential phase of development. e. Applicant shall work with ACHD to construct a safe pedestrian crossing from the central multi-family site area to the parking lot along the west boundary across N. Centrepoint Way. f. With the future Conditional Use Permit for the multi-family development,the building along the west boundary shall be no more than two-stories in height and the three (3)buildings within the center of the project shall be no more than three- stories in height,consistent with the Applicant's revised concept plan and presentation to Council. g. Applicant shall continue the masonry wall along the west property boundary consistent with adjacent development and help buffer the proposed project. h. Staff and Applicant shall work with ACHD to mark Centrepoint Way as no- parking on both sides,should ACHD allow it. i. is to Eagle Read-. j. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions Development Agreement 42 (Parcel F -Commercial): a. Future development of the site shall be generally consistent with the submitted concept plan included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. The required landscape street buffers,multi-use pathway,and decorative lighting along N. Eagle Road shall be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel. c. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. d. Applicant shall work with ITD regarding right-of-way dedication and the proposed improvements to Eagle Road. B. Meridian Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Water is about 200ft from the Property boundary for parcel S 1105110120. 2. Any changes to public water infrastructure must be approved by public works. 3. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 4. Provide 20'Easements for mains,hydrant laterals and water services. Easements should extend up to the end of main/hydrant/water meter and 10'beyond it. 5. No permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls,fences, infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)to be built within the utility easement. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department. 2. Per Meridian City Code (MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). Sewer/water easement varies depending on sewer depth. Sewer 0-20 ft deep require a 30 ft easement,20-25 ft a 40 ft easement,and 25-30 ft a 45 ft easement. Ensure no permanent structures (trees,bushes, buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)are built within the utility easement. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions 5. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development,and if so,how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at ht!p://www.meridiancily.org/public works.aMx?id=272. 19. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 20. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. Meridian Park's Department https://weblink.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo MeridianCit Y- D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) hyps://weblink.meridiancity.oMg/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X E. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X V. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested Development Agreement Modification per the conditions of approval included in Section IV. B. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 3,2025.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject Development Agreement modification requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Maffia-Applicant, Jeff Vrba b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Jeff Vrba d. Written testimony:None C. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Idaho Transportation Department required improvements to Eagle Road as The Eagle Road and Ustick Road intersection is the busiest intersection in the State of Idaho. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action � 1 1 • Ly - �,• - —� err- - a. �.:.a.-,�,JM r L. . { ct Location of Impact "'a Analysis all& 9 - . ._USTICK Ice LU _�` �.. �, H _ ♦.ice ^. ��r .. �t _ Ji f-•r it yj •�'• �.. -;4 L!J a. one. ENEZ Legend �.■�un■It� lkq no Project Location �i■■■■■■!n1 \■■■■III soon 21 11 1 `Area of Impact NINE son Analysis /In 7 �� I!•= ►■un■uOl 111�III♦Illm ■����,�,,� - ��j ter:■t�� ��1�„...... MMl law Air may ,.■ W ■ �■ .:nn.. ,gyp.::■�►p1�1���Olin lolnn.n 11u�r��ii►�ji`�►Awn=�����•�.����� ♦Alb■all ■IlPntl_- -■ - IUIIG`�_ •.. �►. _P.■.:Ilia p\�..=��...���. USTICK ■��r'�� � ,..■■ 111 IltlIt11 i ' np/U1111 1�11111111 Illn -._ I , �■a 1� IIIDllltll t�11111 „'1,■ \I/�'��:a" up'.� '■:=,,� I � 1111111111111/I n Imill I nw au■� ♦ �����.� :. �� � :■Ill nu..��■.0 ■ � uAi oud� nt\� '/ n���11u1..:�,• '11111 CP4:C� wa•n.•i-qu1 �11���1■i .. ► • ♦■`ice i�P.. - � •...� .■unuo■�uuuu •q uuunuu7�::pu (' 1111 = nniuilGw■nu►A■■.tiL 11 W ■■■■.a- oo■■■IIIO.O qU�R ■ Legend 1,w Density ��♦♦,• . ` `Inm■:��■ iiiiiijo it-- Project Location esidential \III■ -III OI►�� J ME: 11 i W Hill r/ 1111 AnalysisArea of Impact R.R.NONE :R,.��%�iq'� IIIIIIII�II�II�I _ -uiili���ii �•' ,"1 p • ♦ N POP IN, WANE I � Vun■�Qm ■'�1■■■■me►�►1.Sm _ �■ ::.iini�► .�":iii►►i►••`m�����■ Offic- I■■■ 1//�q-it�s�■:�`iu uu:�•- _ iilii���i•�q��i�i►•� ■• �.�,,�1■ ■I III�l Irk f��.�. omen►, = a.l .► A��n:Illuws-_ INNER W �r�■n■►♦•ii: iiiii� + ..'�%•Inu■'e�_r�.����I�II�i � III►♦♦ ■u■ �:�--''sw L m1-�•� u�•�1/1■� ,. � .. � 3E IIIIII=IIIIIII.... IIIIII II■-3 i .■.■. .� IIIIII= 111■IIII , U■1 � uo r p 'nlllllll III m=' IIIIII 1::__ 1 ■ ►�:11111111111 �' 11111■■-_: ,� �II� �=uu�rglOumn II ■■uO\Illllr i. �Itluw ,i',"1,■ ►I►�Ingpn uponlme// ► n•� • �auu ♦ 1 , ■. .emu ��� 1' IIIIIIIIIIIIr/I n .♦.♦.♦.♦Q♦.�i �111■11111■■-..► ice" ',. %gyp 11::1111:� •���� � �� W pn1u1 Imo aua ii`�I•�/• _�_� ■ni�� •► lily■Illllo/� uunl�n■ - . ►•Ulu■.:::0 :p 5r■ 11111■uuu■. ■ son 0 W „ /pllUlt ■■ av .:::_Id♦ J��♦�J� :■i• u■■nu'.:�♦♦♦y�`'O�� mill IIIIII :.. ..--- _ .■.■.r_._....�::..:: may., i��� ..�i I nuunu■tip:::ui:::: 0 f♦ r � In Iil/. urn►d�AmLG 1/� ''1,1� �1� r uuu�- ��.- •.1■■�r � ICl//■ :��. -. Legend :�I■C4_ �nnu■I■I��i• iin■ii1 Emu .ME Project Location IIIIIIf .. `�'� 1!inm■•�/uu��u�►1 111��ir>,r1111 Iflll■■1r� I IIP_���>.�� _ of ImpactCI- -loom,► nn■o� �� i/•�\ � � pool■ pI 0 111Planned Parcels � _ ::Ih�%4i:�� uuuuu,.I.w i_Ir -■�iii���ii► ��•� on ,�■' 0 Analysis MINIM -- �•�j�q=. r�,■■n■■nu:♦i EI:� �iiliiir��:►�%:ir•�.i►I:i�;►���,�1� - U■I�O►♦�- i some Items:�■_:1�'_ • .�►�Au■n_..�f• ���■ • ume. PI - �i�:i i�in■i i11111111��.►� . 11■- ■- tine 11 p 11t1��t■1■Wq1 ►►_��► �.•.:'ii men-- • It=no��■__1 men p■n■.�♦ n: �.nnaur��\_:•7� i: •:=lpiii:■� \•i',��••11■�i N�■ _L I ■tit■► ■■11�� ■r•'-IIIIIIII=_ �■ )•t�_ :. ��,.1 1 01.11, ulwu_ . . .IIIIII■�:.a ,.1 1■A r USTICK � i •,••,U IIIIII _ ,�'�I• IU � memo: •,,■o -11111■1 f�1=f . , ill /♦..❖.sees.•. ' :111■11111■ . .. I, IIIIII■.■.. olio■ iiiiiii�Inn 1;■ �'_=11men 4 1 mom = 1 nnnuu_p� ■nv�■.0:r .r , IIIIIIII u : �:�►�i■■:::: IIII■III- ro men■�mere �:■fi■.y::�l�uumenu::►Py! W • ■.-- me mono��uuunuq__■Q♦Qs�: � '. \■■�D� uuun■me■1_.�omen a::■v♦�i�♦� � ,1'111 1■w umnuuiilGm n■\�CI1■■•VI��/ W ml� ■ pun■me■nu■■r/Ip�nnnmm�umuu nr�nun n B. Subject Site Photo low t- -: City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits C. Approved Site Plan—Parcel E(date: 8/30/2022) SITE INFONUTEOei jE 6 i LEGEND Ik ----------- CONCEPT SITE PLAN-CENTREPOINT Exela i U d&Mwidlan,ID CuH nnky*HM City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits D. Approved Site Plan—Parcel F(date: 1/27/2021) r..i..r mi.m.n..: THE GROUP ?'t5?:'•,;i?'_3iii::ii�f> °rtsi�i::3iii��:k: .a a.... \4[ ft..r C.ko w f WMG s+ me.rw m w � d ul I NW— UPI •: ` Conditional Use Permit-Site Plan -- -- C1.00 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits E. Approved Landscape Plan-Parcel E (date: 9/19/2022) eoewrrueroaeeuu • .� '- LIWOSCAPE REp11REMENfS CONCEPT LANSCAPE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT We&Usdck Meridian,ID Kimley»Horn City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits Mo ®m �o Mm ®� u, aietaett:na a. Approved Open Space and Amenity Exhibit—Parcel E(date: 9/19/2022) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ronu v,cAm�. aw,,cw.swsn w[µ uasv .wow.. .ri_i.. '••` ara.Lxrs� u�..r-aoer.aao e. I I I r— LJ �— LI111 ,�Ib��� I — I / J r —i 1 LU OPEN SPACE _ 1 1 I I CONCEPT OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT Eagle&Ustick Meridian,ID , Kimley))Horn City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits G. Approved Building Elevations—Parcel E (date: 8/30/2022) BUILDING A-EAST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING A-WEST ELEVATION S ------_ -- - --- emo - ,—.; wT BUILDING A-SOUTH ELEVATION 2 vie=r-a' %:III $ - - - - BUILDING A-NORTH ELEVATION 1 BUILDING A - ELEVATIONS AP0.30 2223-BUILDING A BOISE,ID 08130/22 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits — —-—-—- -- — --- — er ® B-CACRCCi9� -- '--- - RI➢OC-F:�CR:� Ag`I B.P3C-FLCGI BIDGC BUILDING D-WEST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING D-NORTH ELEVATION 2 We'=Tw' mr=T-v a i$ i- NT 11-1 -- - r BUILDING D-EAST ELEVATION 3 BUILDING D-SOUTH ELEVATION 7 BUILDING E ELEVATIONS AP0.34 2223-BUILDING E BOISE.ID 08/30/2022 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits BUILDING F-NORTN EIEVATBIN 4 BUILDING F-WEST EIEYAiIdI 2 BU►OINGF-MNIINELEVATION 3 BUILDING F-EAST ELEVATION 1 BUILDING F-ELEVATIONS AP0.35 ��- 2223-BUILDING F oora_o ce,mecr_ City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Centrepoint Apartments - Parcel F - H-2025-0009) Between City of Meridian and MGM Meridian LLC for Property Located at 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-076811 Boise,Idaho Pgs=33 vbailey 11/19/2025 12:25:00 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. MGM Meridian 2 LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(this "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of /VO(MMpf' , 2025,by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called "CITY,"whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and MGM Meridian 2 LLC, whose address is 3130 Alpine Road Suite 288 -#708, Portola Valley, California 94028, hereinafter called "OWNER/DEVELOPER." 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of a certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, identified as Ada County Parcel #S 1105110120 and described in Exhibit"A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as the "Property;" and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, establish provisions governing the creation, form, recording,modification, enforcement and termination of development agreements required or permitted as a condition of zoning that the Owner/Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-5B-3 of the Unified Development Code ("UDC"), which authorizes development agreements and the modification of development agreements; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer has submitted an application for development agreement modification to remove the property listed in Exhibit"A" from an existing Development Agreement (Centrepointe Mixed-Use MDA H-2022-0035) recorded in Ada County on September 14, 2022 as Instrument#2022-079000, for DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA—PARCEL F—H-2025-0009 Page 1 of 8 the inclusion of the Property into this new Agreement,which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the duly noticed public hearings before the Meridian City Council, as to how the property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested development agreement modification held before the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 17th of June, 2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit "B;" and 1.8 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.9 WHEREAS, the property listed in Exhibit"A" shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreement (Centrepointe Mixed-Use MDA H- 2022-0035) recorded in Ada County on September 14, 2022 as Instrument#2022- 079000 and shall be bound by the terms contained herein in this new agreement; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement modification for the purpose of ensuring that the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designations are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL F-H-2025-0009 Page 2 of 8 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement, the following words, terms and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a parry to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to MGM Meridian 2 LLC,whose address is 3130 Alpine Road Suite 288 - #708, Portola Valley, California 94028, the party that owns said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit"A" describing a parcel to be removed from existing Development Agreement (Centrepointe Mixed-Use MDA H-2022-0035) recorded in Ada County on September 14, 2022 as Instrument #2022-079000,with such parcel being bound by this new Agreement, which Exhibit "A" is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed as permitted, conditional and/or accessory uses under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1 Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of the Property shall be generally consistent with the submitted concept plan included in Section VI of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit`B" and the provisions contained herein. b. The required landscape street buffers, multi-use pathway, and decorative lighting along N. Eagle Road shall be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Property. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL F-H-2025-0009 Page 3 of 8 c. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Property and the adjacent Residential Parcel (Parcel E), Ada County Parcel #S1105110111, allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. d. Owner/Developer shall work with Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) regarding right-of-way dedication and the proposed improvements to Eagle Road. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six(6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default. In the event Owner/Developer, or Owner's Developer's heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default, which actions must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty(180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall,upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code § 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to the City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL F-H-2025-0009 Page 4 of 8 appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion therefor in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinance of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements,which the Owner/Developer agrees to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued if the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL F-H-2025-0009 Page 5 of 8 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail,postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: MGM Meridian 2 LLC 3130 Alpine Road Suite 288 -#708 Portola Valley, California 94028 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other parry so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, has determined that Owner/Developer has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL F-H-2025-0009 Page 6 of 8 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each parry shall act reasonable in giving any consent, approval, or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time,provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property, which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing the Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [End of text. Acknowledgements, signatures, and Exhibits A and B follow.] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-PARCEL F-H-2025-0009 Page 7 of 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: MGM Meridian 2 LLC By(printed name): ell , r Its (title): State of ) ss: County of ) On this day of /2025befome,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared knowd to me to be the of MGM Meridian 2 LLC and the person who signed above and acknoe that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereund and affixed m official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public My Commission Expires: CITY OF MERIDIAN Liz Strader,Council Vice President 11-18-2025 Attest:By Chris Johnson,City Clerk 11-18-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on_11-18-2025 by Liz Strader and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian,in their capacities as Council Vice President and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires:3-28-2028 .u&-O - - ACKINull.A.ILEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached , and not the truthfulness , accuracy , or validity of that document . State of California County of San Mateo ) On V qleL5 before me , Jason Salazar , Notary Public ( insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared Ktclic \ c , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person ( s ) whose name ( s ) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his / her/their authorized capacity ( ies ) , and that by his/ her/their signature ( s ) on the instrument the person ( s ) , or the entity upon behalf of which the person ( s ) acted , executed the instrument . I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct . n � g. ..... � � � � �WITNESS m � � � • California y h a d and o icial seal . �. ` San Mateo Counter Y Commission 2477259 + eO III I° My Comm , Expires Dec 23 , 2427 Signature ( Seal ) PARCEL F LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, and is described as follows: PARCEL F: A parcel of land located in Government Lot 1 in the Northeast One Quarter of Section 5, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 5 of said Township 3 North, Range 1 East, (from which point the North Quarter Corner of said Section 5 bears South 89039'20" West, 2656.46 feet distant); Thence from said Section Corner, South 00000'00" East, a distance of 400.00 feet on the East line of said Section 5; Thence North 84006'00" West, a distance of 51.29 feet to the Northeast Corner of that Parcel C as described in Warranty Deed Instrument Number 2017-094272 of Ada County Records, said point being on the westerly right-of-way line of North Eagle Road, and being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 010 14' 39" West, a distance of 276.81 feet on the easterly boundary line of said Parcel C and on the westerly right-of-way line of North Eagle Road to the Northeast Corner of Bienville Square Subdivision, as same is shown on the Plat thereof, recorded in Book 102 of Plats at Page 13495 of Ada County Records; Thence North 830 54' 00" West, a distance of 198.40 feet on the Northerly line of said Bienville Square Subdivision; Thence North 060 06' 00" East, a distance of 275.20 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary line of that Parcel C as described in said Warranty Deed Instrument Number 2017-094272; Thence South 840 06' 00" East, a distance of 174.97 feet on the Northerly boundary line of said Parcel C to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN: S1105110120 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CVIENty AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Development Agreement modification,by Mike Maffia,MGM2. Case No(s). H-2025-0009 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 3,2025 (Findings on June 17,2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3, 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance,established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -1- reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a Development Agreement modification is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner,and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two (2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -2- City Code Title I I(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted,including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10,seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d)and 67-8003,an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 17th day of June,2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert �on 6-17-2025 Att i f� p�['ilp of f j C E IDIAN'� „�ioauo SFAI. =frri <T� Chris JOhnsO 6-17-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: - Dated: 6-17-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA—H-2025-0009) -4- EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �E DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT HEARING April 22, 2025 continued to Legend DATE: May 13, June 3,2025 �7 Project Location Area of Impact TO: Mayor&City Council «= City Limits OAnalysis FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner F 208-884-5533 ��`' +1� lritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Mike Maffia,MGM2 oa � SUBJECT: H-2025-0009 Centrepoint Apartments MDA ' , LOCATION: 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. L Cajun Lane,located in the NE '/4 of -- Section 5,Township 3N,Range I _- (Parcel(s)# S 1105110111 and S1105110120) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project approval that was received in 2022 (H-2022-0072)with the modification to the existing Development Agreement(Instrument No. 2022-079000) for the existing 11.17 acres. The modification will create two(2)new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. B. Issues/Waivers In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project that was previously approved in 2022 (H-2022-0072). C. Recommendation Recommend approval of the proposed Development Agreement modification. D. Decision Approved with conditions City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1•Land Use Description Details Mal)Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-Family Residential and Commercial - Existing Zoning C-G VI.A.2 Proposed Zoning C-G Adopted FLUM Designation MU-R VI.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation MU-R Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 1/28/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 2/25/2025 Site posting date 4/3/2025 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Centrepoint Apartments MDA H-2025-0009 (copy this link into a separate browser). Table 3:Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2018-0121 (Villasport CUP,MDA);H-2021-0006(CUP),H-2022-0035 (MDA,DA Inst.#2022-079000);H-2024-0019(ALT,CUP,MDA)—this application was approved but the applicant terminated their entitlement rights;TED-2023-0002;TEC-2025-0001 Phasing Plan None Residential Units 213 multi-family units-One(1)two-story building and five(5)3-story buildings Open Space 6.78 acres(295,401 s.f.)of qualified open space proposed according to the open space exhibit(approximately 40%). Amenities At a minimum, 13 amenities are proposed—See the amenity Exhibit in Section VII below. Physical Features The Milk Lateral has previously been piped and there is a thirty(30)foot irrigation easement that goes through the property. Acreage 11.17 Lots 2 Density Gross—21.3 du/ac. City of Meridian Department Report IL Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject application encompasses two(2)parcels located south of E. Ustick Road(Parcels S 1105110111 and S 1105110120. Parcel S 1105110111 was part of a Development Agreement Modification and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)application in 2019 that removed the subject parcel from an existing Development Agreement(DA) for the purpose of entering into a new DA with a new conceptual plan and building elevations(H-2018-0121,DA Inst. #2019-060877)and a request for a new athletic club and spa(indoor recreation facility),Villasport. The CUP approval for the indoor recreation facility has since expired and the property was sold. The current CUP and DA(H-2022-0035 DA Inst#2022-079000)was approved to construct a mixed-use development consisting of commercial space and a 213-unit multi-family development in lieu of an athletic club/spa and commercial building. In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. B. Development Agreement Modification The applicant is requesting the following changes to the Development Agreement: • Parcel E(3100 Centrepoint Way) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments shall be constructed and vegetated with the residential phase of development along E.Ustick Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the residential phase—Parcel E of development. • Parcel F (3030 N. Cajun Lane) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway along N. Eagle Road will be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel—Parcel F. C. Staffs Analysis Staff has no objection to the Applicant's request for a modification to the existing development agreement(H-2021-0103,Inst. 92022-066859)to create two(2)new development agreements so that each parcel can develop independently. On December 3,2024,the City Council approved findings for H02024-0019 for modifications to the existing Development Agreement(DA)H-2022-0035 and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)H- 2022-0072 to facilitate the construction of a 239-unit multifamily affordable apartment project. This proposal strictly pertains to the residential component of the approved development plan. The applicant also requested alternative compliance for the to the open space and parking lot landscaping. In January of 2025,that applicant terminated the entitlements and withdrew their application for the Centrepoint Apartments project(H-2024-0019 ALT,CUP,MDA)due to complications at the State level with project financing. An administrative time extension(TED- 2023-0002)was approved for a two-year period in April of 2023. Prior to the expiration date of April 1,2025,the applicant submitted an application for an additional two-year During the review process for H-2024-0019,ITD required the applicant to dedicate twelve (12) feet of right-of-way on Eagle Road and reconstruct the right turn lane to Seville Lane. The current DA requires the landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments to be constructed and vegetated with the first phase of development along E.Ustick Road and N. Eagle Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the first phase of development. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis The applicant is proposing to create two development agreements for the following reasons: • To allow landscape street buffers and pathways along E.Ustick Road as well as the 25- foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries to be developed with the residential development on Parcel E. E. Ustiek Read are insta4led no later-gian a yeai-7 after-appr-&val of the development agfeement medifiea4ien as this is�he final fnissiiig 14+k leadiiig up to Eagle Read. • To allow the landscape buffer and pathway along N. Eagle Road to be constructed with the commercial development on Parcel F. Therefore,each parcel owner will be responsible for the improvements outlined in each of their development agreements. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. Development Agreement Modification(Parcel E—Multi-family): 1.1 The modified Development Agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council approval of the Findings. The Development Agreement shall,at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of the site shall be substantially consistent with the submitted concept plan and color renderings included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. Future development of Parcel E shall comply with the standards outlined in the multi-family development specific use standards,UDC 11-4-3-27. c. All future pedestrian crossings that traverse shared drive aisles within the development shall be constructed with brick,pavers, stamped concrete,or colored concrete to clearly delineate the driving surface from the pedestrian facilities,per UDC 11-3A-19B.4b. d. The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segment shall be constructed and vegetated with the€rrst residential phase of development along E. Ustick Road and N. Eagle R,,..a;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the&4 residential phase of development. e. Applicant shall work with ACHD to construct a safe pedestrian crossing from the central multi-family site area to the parking lot along the west boundary across N. Centrepoint Way. f. With the future Conditional Use Permit for the multi-family development,the building along the west boundary shall be no more than two-stories in height and the three (3)buildings within the center of the project shall be no more than three- stories in height,consistent with the Applicant's revised concept plan and presentation to Council. g. Applicant shall continue the masonry wall along the west property boundary consistent with adjacent development and help buffer the proposed project. h. Staff and Applicant shall work with ACHD to mark Centrepoint Way as no- parking on both sides,should ACHD allow it. i. is to Eagle Read-. j. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions Development Agreement 42 (Parcel F -Commercial): a. Future development of the site shall be generally consistent with the submitted concept plan included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. The required landscape street buffers,multi-use pathway,and decorative lighting along N. Eagle Road shall be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel. c. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. d. Applicant shall work with ITD regarding right-of-way dedication and the proposed improvements to Eagle Road. B. Meridian Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Water is about 200ft from the Property boundary for parcel S 1105110120. 2. Any changes to public water infrastructure must be approved by public works. 3. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 4. Provide 20'Easements for mains,hydrant laterals and water services. Easements should extend up to the end of main/hydrant/water meter and 10'beyond it. 5. No permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls,fences, infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)to be built within the utility easement. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department. 2. Per Meridian City Code (MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). Sewer/water easement varies depending on sewer depth. Sewer 0-20 ft deep require a 30 ft easement,20-25 ft a 40 ft easement,and 25-30 ft a 45 ft easement. Ensure no permanent structures (trees,bushes, buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)are built within the utility easement. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions 5. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development,and if so,how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at ht!p://www.meridiancily.org/public works.aMx?id=272. 19. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 20. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. Meridian Park's Department https://weblink.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo MeridianCit Y- D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) hyps://weblink.meridiancity.oMg/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X E. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X V. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested Development Agreement Modification per the conditions of approval included in Section IV. B. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 3,2025.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject Development Agreement modification requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Maffia-Applicant, Jeff Vrba b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Jeff Vrba d. Written testimony:None C. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Idaho Transportation Department required improvements to Eagle Road as The Eagle Road and Ustick Road intersection is the busiest intersection in the State of Idaho. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action � 1 1 • Ly - �,• - —� err- - a. �.:.a.-,�,JM r L. . { ct Location of Impact "'a Analysis all& 9 - . ._USTICK Ice LU _�` �.. �, H _ ♦.ice ^. ��r .. �t _ Ji f-•r it yj •�'• �.. -;4 L!J a. one. ENEZ Legend �.■�un■It� lkq no Project Location �i■■■■■■!n1 \■■■■III soon 21 11 1 `Area of Impact NINE son Analysis /In 7 �� I!•= ►■un■uOl 111�III♦Illm ■����,�,,� - ��j ter:■t�� ��1�„...... MMl law Air may ,.■ W ■ �■ .:nn.. ,gyp.::■�►p1�1���Olin lolnn.n 11u�r��ii►�ji`�►Awn=�����•�.����� ♦Alb■all ■IlPntl_- -■ - IUIIG`�_ •.. �►. _P.■.:Ilia p\�..=��...���. USTICK ■��r'�� � ,..■■ 111 IltlIt11 i ' np/U1111 1�11111111 Illn -._ I , �■a 1� IIIDllltll t�11111 „'1,■ \I/�'��:a" up'.� '■:=,,� I � 1111111111111/I n Imill I nw au■� ♦ �����.� :. �� � :■Ill nu..��■.0 ■ � uAi oud� nt\� '/ n���11u1..:�,• '11111 CP4:C� wa•n.•i-qu1 �11���1■i .. ► • ♦■`ice i�P.. - � •...� .■unuo■�uuuu •q uuunuu7�::pu (' 1111 = nniuilGw■nu►A■■.tiL 11 W ■■■■.a- oo■■■IIIO.O qU�R ■ Legend 1,w Density ��♦♦,• . ` `Inm■:��■ iiiiiijo it-- Project Location esidential \III■ -III OI►�� J ME: 11 i W Hill r/ 1111 AnalysisArea of Impact R.R.NONE :R,.��%�iq'� IIIIIIII�II�II�I _ -uiili���ii �•' ,"1 p • ♦ N POP IN, WANE I � Vun■�Qm ■'�1■■■■me►�►1.Sm _ �■ ::.iini�► .�":iii►►i►••`m�����■ Offic- I■■■ 1//�q-it�s�■:�`iu uu:�•- _ iilii���i•�q��i�i►•� ■• �.�,,�1■ ■I III�l Irk f��.�. omen►, = a.l .► A��n:Illuws-_ INNER W �r�■n■►♦•ii: iiiii� + ..'�%•Inu■'e�_r�.����I�II�i � III►♦♦ ■u■ �:�--''sw L m1-�•� u�•�1/1■� ,. � .. � 3E IIIIII=IIIIIII.... IIIIII II■-3 i .■.■. .� IIIIII= 111■IIII , U■1 � uo r p 'nlllllll III m=' IIIIII 1::__ 1 ■ ►�:11111111111 �' 11111■■-_: ,� �II� �=uu�rglOumn II ■■uO\Illllr i. �Itluw ,i',"1,■ ►I►�Ingpn uponlme// ► n•� • �auu ♦ 1 , ■. .emu ��� 1' IIIIIIIIIIIIr/I n .♦.♦.♦.♦Q♦.�i �111■11111■■-..► ice" ',. %gyp 11::1111:� •���� � �� W pn1u1 Imo aua ii`�I•�/• _�_� ■ni�� •► lily■Illllo/� uunl�n■ - . ►•Ulu■.:::0 :p 5r■ 11111■uuu■. ■ son 0 W „ /pllUlt ■■ av .:::_Id♦ J��♦�J� :■i• u■■nu'.:�♦♦♦y�`'O�� mill IIIIII :.. ..--- _ .■.■.r_._....�::..:: may., i��� ..�i I nuunu■tip:::ui:::: 0 f♦ r � In Iil/. urn►d�AmLG 1/� ''1,1� �1� r uuu�- ��.- •.1■■�r � ICl//■ :��. -. Legend :�I■C4_ �nnu■I■I��i• iin■ii1 Emu .ME Project Location IIIIIIf .. `�'� 1!inm■•�/uu��u�►1 111��ir>,r1111 Iflll■■1r� I IIP_���>.�� _ of ImpactCI- -loom,► nn■o� �� i/•�\ � � pool■ pI 0 111Planned Parcels � _ ::Ih�%4i:�� uuuuu,.I.w i_Ir -■�iii���ii► ��•� on ,�■' 0 Analysis MINIM -- �•�j�q=. r�,■■n■■nu:♦i EI:� �iiliiir��:►�%:ir•�.i►I:i�;►���,�1� - U■I�O►♦�- i some Items:�■_:1�'_ • .�►�Au■n_..�f• ���■ • ume. PI - �i�:i i�in■i i11111111��.►� . 11■- ■- tine 11 p 11t1��t■1■Wq1 ►►_��► �.•.:'ii men-- • It=no��■__1 men p■n■.�♦ n: �.nnaur��\_:•7� i: •:=lpiii:■� \•i',��••11■�i N�■ _L I ■tit■► ■■11�� ■r•'-IIIIIIII=_ �■ )•t�_ :. ��,.1 1 01.11, ulwu_ . . .IIIIII■�:.a ,.1 1■A r USTICK � i •,••,U IIIIII _ ,�'�I• IU � memo: •,,■o -11111■1 f�1=f . , ill /♦..❖.sees.•. ' :111■11111■ . .. I, IIIIII■.■.. olio■ iiiiiii�Inn 1;■ �'_=11men 4 1 mom = 1 nnnuu_p� ■nv�■.0:r .r , IIIIIIII u : �:�►�i■■:::: IIII■III- ro men■�mere �:■fi■.y::�l�uumenu::►Py! W • ■.-- me mono��uuunuq__■Q♦Qs�: � '. \■■�D� uuun■me■1_.�omen a::■v♦�i�♦� � ,1'111 1■w umnuuiilGm n■\�CI1■■•VI��/ W ml� ■ pun■me■nu■■r/Ip�nnnmm�umuu nr�nun n B. Subject Site Photo low t- -: City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits C. Approved Site Plan—Parcel E(date: 8/30/2022) SITE INFONUTEOei jE 6 i LEGEND Ik ----------- CONCEPT SITE PLAN-CENTREPOINT Exela i U d&Mwidlan,ID CuH nnky*HM City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits D. Approved Site Plan—Parcel F(date: 1/27/2021) r..i..r mi.m.n..: THE GROUP ?'t5?:'•,;i?'_3iii::ii�f> °rtsi�i::3iii��:k: .a a.... \4[ ft..r C.ko w f WMG s+ me.rw m w � d ul I NW— UPI •: ` Conditional Use Permit-Site Plan -- -- C1.00 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits E. Approved Landscape Plan-Parcel E (date: 9/19/2022) eoewrrueroaeeuu • .� '- LIWOSCAPE REp11REMENfS CONCEPT LANSCAPE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT We&Usdck Meridian,ID Kimley»Horn City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits Mo ®m �o Mm ®� u, aietaett:na a. Approved Open Space and Amenity Exhibit—Parcel E(date: 9/19/2022) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ronu v,cAm�. aw,,cw.swsn w[µ uasv .wow.. .ri_i.. '••` ara.Lxrs� u�..r-aoer.aao e. I I I r— LJ �— LI111 ,�Ib��� I — I / J r —i 1 LU OPEN SPACE _ 1 1 I I CONCEPT OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT Eagle&Ustick Meridian,ID , Kimley))Horn City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits G. Approved Building Elevations—Parcel E (date: 8/30/2022) BUILDING A-EAST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING A-WEST ELEVATION S ------_ -- - --- emo - ,—.; wT BUILDING A-SOUTH ELEVATION 2 vie=r-a' %:III $ - - - - BUILDING A-NORTH ELEVATION 1 BUILDING A - ELEVATIONS AP0.30 2223-BUILDING A BOISE,ID 08130/22 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits — —-—-—- -- — --- — er ® B-CACRCCi9� -- '--- - RI➢OC-F:�CR:� Ag`I B.P3C-FLCGI BIDGC BUILDING D-WEST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING D-NORTH ELEVATION 2 We'=Tw' mr=T-v a i$ i- NT 11-1 -- - r BUILDING D-EAST ELEVATION 3 BUILDING D-SOUTH ELEVATION 7 BUILDING E ELEVATIONS AP0.34 2223-BUILDING E BOISE.ID 08/30/2022 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits BUILDING F-NORTN EIEVATBIN 4 BUILDING F-WEST EIEYAiIdI 2 BU►OINGF-MNIINELEVATION 3 BUILDING F-EAST ELEVATION 1 BUILDING F-ELEVATIONS AP0.35 ��- 2223-BUILDING F oora_o ce,mecr_ City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Project/Pathway Agreement between the City of Meridian and the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District for Construction and Continued Operation of a Pedestrian Pathway and Other Improvements along the Ninemile Drain and the Rutledge Lateral (Rail with Trail Pathway) PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT (Rail with Trail Pathway-Nine Mile Drain/Rutledge Lateral) This PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2025, by and between NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, an irrigation district organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Idaho, party of the first party, hereinafter referred to as the"District,"and THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, a political subdivision and municipality of the State of Idaho, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 party or parties of the second part, hereinafter referred to as the"City," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the District and the City entered into a Master Agreement entered into March 18, 2014 and recorded as Instrument No. 114029168 in the records of Ada County, Idaho, and subsequently entered into an Addendum to Master Agreement dated August 8, 2023, recorded as Instrument No. 2023-045915, records of Ada County, Idaho, hereinafter collectively referred to as the"Master Agreement;" and, WHEREAS, the District and the City intended by entering the Master Agreement to establish a process for the City's submission of encroachment proposals and the District's consideration of such proposals and to provide the general conditions for the District's approval and permission of encroachment proposals affecting the District's ditches, property, operations and maintenance; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Master Pathway Agreement For Developing and Maintaining Pathways for public use along and across some of the District's ditches and within some of the District's easements and fee title lands dated December 19, 2000,recorded as Instrument No. 100102999, records of Ada County, Idaho, and subsequently entered into an Addendum to Master Pathway Agreement dated July 6, 2023, recorded as Instrument No. 2023- 039167, records of Ada County, Idaho, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Master Pathway Agreement;" and WHEREAS, the District grants to the City the right develop pathways to encroach within the District's easements along and across the District's ditches, canals and easements therefor upon the terms and conditions of said Master Pathway Agreement and after the execution of an agreement for each proposed crossing and encroachment; and PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT Page 1 of 7 WHEREAS, the City is the owner of the real property/ right of way (burdened with the easement of the District hereinafter mentioned)particularly described in the"Legal Description" attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the District controls the irrigation/drainage ditches, drains or laterals known as the RUTLEDGE LATERAL AND NINE MILE DRAIN (hereinafter collectively referred to as "ditch or drain') together with the real property and/or easement to convey irrigation and drainage water, to operate and maintain the ditch or drain, and which crosses and intersects said described real property of the City as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, the City seeks permission to: 1) construct and install a 10' wide asphalt pedestrian pathway across and over the Rutledge Lateral and Nine Mile Drain and within the District's easements; and 2) in order to construct the above-referenced pathway over the Nine Mile Drain, pipe the Nine Mile Drain for a distance of 207 linear feet in 60" Class III RCP, including a new concrete headwall on the downstream end; and 3) in order to construct the above-referenced pathway over the Rutledge Lateral, pipe the Rutledge Lateral for a distance of 1,340 linear feet in 36" Class III RCP, including six new cast in place boxes and reconstruction of one existing delivery boxes, under the terms and conditions of said Master Agreement and Master Pathway Agreement and those hereinafter set forth, NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of the covenants, agreements and conditions hereinafter set forth and those set forth in said Master Agreement and Master Pathway Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. City may: a) construct and install a 10' wide asphalt pedestrian pathway across and over the Rutledge Lateral and Nine Mile Drain and within the District's easements; and b) in order to construct the above-referenced pathway over the Nine Mile Drain, pipe the Nine Mile Drain for a distance of 207 linear feet in 60" Class III RCP, including a new concrete headwall on the downstream end; and c) in order to construct the above-referenced pathway over the Rutledge Lateral, pipe the Rutledge Lateral for a distance of 1,340 linear feet in 36" Class III RCP, including six new cast in place boxes and reconstruction of one existing delivery boxes, located in Meridian, Ada County, Idaho as shown in the attached project plans stated as Exhibit B-1. 2. Any construction of the bridge and/or pathway shall be performed in accordance with the project plans shown in Exhibit B-1 and the "Special Conditions" stated in Exhibit C, attached hereto and by this reference made part thereof. 3. The parties hereto incorporate in and make part of this Project/Pathway Agreement all the covenants, conditions, and agreements of said Master Agreement and Master Pathway Agreement unchanged except as the result of the provisions of this Project/Pathway Agreement. The covenants, conditions and agreements herein contained and incorporated by reference shall constitute covenants to run with, and running with, all of the lands of the City PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT Page 2 of 7 described in said Exhibit A, and shall be binding on each of the parties hereto and on all parties and all persons claiming under them or either of them, and the advantages hereof shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. END OF TERMS - SEE FOLLOWING PAGES FOR SIGNATURES PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT Page 3 of 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the District has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed and the City has caused its name to be subscribed by its duly authorized officer, all as of the day and year herein first above written. NAMPA& MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT By David Duvall,Water Superintendent STATE OF IDAHO ) ss: County of Canyon ) On this day of , 2025, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared DAVID DUVALL, known to me to be the Water Superintendent of NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, the irrigation district that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such irrigation district executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho Residing at , Idaho My Commission Expires: PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT Page 4 of 7 THE CITY OF MERIDIAN E i # By m ATTEST: r F 4 4- f p l PIED AUG , A Uo ,o City of Chrdohnson ' Jerk 1 - = 925E IDIAN STATE OF ID /"t' IDAHO ss: s� SEALS County of ADA Rd/the TREP9J On this 18th day of November , 2025, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,person 11 '�, peared_ La z GTY�e r and Chris Johnson , known to me to be th resident and City Clerk , respectively, of The CITY OF MERIDIAN, the entity that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that such entity executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the. day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Men ian o �" Residing at MeridiaCHARLENE WAY n, ID COMMISSIONMy Commission Expires:_ -i-qg NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A Legal Description The City's has an easement/right of way for the pathway which is described in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. EXHIBIT B Cross_inp-Location See Exhibits A-1 and B-1 attached hereto. EXHIBIT C Special Conditions a. Construction authorized by this Project/Pathway Agreement shall be in accordance with Exhibit B-1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. b. City shall notify the water superintendent of the District prior to and immediately after construction so that he or the District's engineers may inspect and approve the construction, including inspecting the compaction around the ditch or canal prior to backfilling. Licensee shall provide a minimum of 72 hours before needing or requesting any construction inspections. C. City shall be responsible for repair and maintenance associated with the pipes and related structures constructed/installed in the Rutledge Lateral and Nine Mile Drain by the City pursuant to this Project/Pathway Agreement, including rehabilitation or replacement of the pipes, headwall and boxes. Maintenance and repairs shall include, but not be limited to, all repairs necessary to preserve the structural integrity of the ditch or drain and its banks and unobstructed flow of water through such portion of the ditch or drain and prevent the loss of water from such portion of the ditch or drain. If the City shall fail in any respect to properly maintain and repair such portion of the ditch or drain, then the District, at its option, and without impairing or in anyway affecting its other rights and remedies hereunder, shall have the right to perform the necessary maintenance and repairs and the City agrees to pay to the District, on demand, the cost or expense which shall be reasonably expended or incurred by the District for such purposes. The District shall give reasonable notice to the City prior to the District's performing such maintenance, repair or other work except that in cases of emergency the District shall attempt to give such notice as reasonable under the circumstances. Nothing in this paragraph shall create or support any claim of any kind by the City or any third party against the District for failure to exercise the options stated in this paragraph, and the City shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the District from any claims made against the District arising out of or relating to the City's obligation to maintain and repair the ditch or drain as provided in this paragraph except for claims arising solely out of the negligence or fault of the District. d. The permitted hours of use of the pathway shall be from one half hour before sunrise and one-half hour after sunset. e. City acknowledges that the District's easement for the ditch or drain includes a PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT Page 6 of 7 sufficient area of land to convey irrigation and drainage water, to operate, clean, maintain and repair the ditch or drain, and to access the ditch or drain for those purposes, and that, in the location of the City's project, NMID claims a minimum easement dimension for the Nine Mile Drain of 100 feet, 50 feet to either side of the centerline and a minimum easement dimension for the Rutledge Lateral of 45 feet, 25 feet to the left and 20 feet to the right of the centerline looking downstream. f. Piping of the Rutledge Lateral and Nine Mile Drain, and anything in the channel of the ditch or drain shall be completed during the non-irrigation season and such piping/construction shall be completed prior to March 15, 2026. All other construction authorized by this Project/Pathway Agreement shall be completed within one year of the date of this Project/Pathway Agreement. Time is of the essence. g. The duration of the permission granted by this Project/Pathway Agreement shall be in perpetuity, for the life and maintenance of the encroachments including construction, operation,maintenance, repair and reconstruction. END OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS PROJECT/PATHWAY AGREEMENT Page 7 of 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN 14 FOOT PATHWAY EASEMENT A 14-foot-wide Pathway easement being in a portion of Block 6 of West View Addition found in Book 2 Page 68 of Ada County records being located in the South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 12,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Commencing at found Aluminum cap marking the intersection of NW. 7th Street and W. Broadway Avenue from which a found 5/8"iron rod marking the intersection of NW 3rd Street and W. Broadway Avenue bears S 89°29'37" E a distance of 1,543.16 feet and being the basis of bearing for this description; thence leaving said intersection S 00030'23"W a distance of 30.00 feet to the Southerly right-of-way line of said W. Broadway Avenue; thence along said right-of-way line N 89029'37"W a distance of 133.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving said Southerly right-of-way line along the Easterly and Northerly line of a 14-foot-wide pathway easement the following Sixteen (16)courses; thence along a curve to the right, having an arc length of 17.50 feet, a radius of 67.00 feet,a central angle of 14057'57",a long chord that bears S 09021,45"W a distance of 17.45 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left, having an arc length of 29.36 feet, radius of 93.00 feet, a central angle of 18*05'19", a chord that bears S 07°48'04"W, a chord distance of 29.24 feet; thence S 01014'34" E, a distance of 225.25 feet;; thence along a curve to the left, having an arc length of 19.90 feet, a radius of 10.00 feet,a central angle of 114000'54", a chord that bears S 58015'01" E a distance of 16.77 feet; thence to a point of compound curve to the left, having an arc length of 2.85 feet, radius of 113.50 feet, a central angle of 01°26'25",a chord that bears N 64"01'20" E, a chord distance of 2.85 feet; thence N 63*18'08" E a distance of 15.22 feet; thence along a curve to the right, having an arc length of 65.58 feet, a radius of 112.00 feet, a central angle of 33032'52",a chord that bears N 80004'34"E a distance of 64.65 feet; thence S 83°09'00" E a distance of 85.38 feet; Exhibit A-1, page 1 thence along a curve to the left, having an arc length of 19.65 feet, a radius of 223.00 feet, a central angle of 05°02'54", a chord that bears S 85040'27" E a distance of 19.64 feet; thence S 88011'55" E a distance of 502.02 feet; thence S 88058'48" E a distance of 581.59 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right, having an arc length of 65.84 feet, radius of 122.32 feet, a central angle of 30"50'19",a chord that bears S 71*15'15" E, a chord distance of 65.05 feet, thence along a non-tangent curve to the left, having a arc length of 56.89 feet, radius of 93.07 feet, a central angle of 35001'30", a chord that bears S 70019,30" E, a chord distance of 56.01 feet; thence along a fine, S 87°50'39"E, a distance of 165.86 feet;; thence along a curve to the left, having an are length of 39.49 feet, a radius of 68.00 feet, a central angle of 33°96'34", a chord that bears N 75031'05" E a distance of 38.94 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right, having a arc length of 48.23 feet, radius of 17.00 feet, a central angle of 162°3346",a chord that bears N 53°49'20" E, a chord distance of 33.61 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right, having a arc length of 20.07 feet, radius of 63.50 feet, a central angle of 18006'28", a chord that bears N 68°26'35"E, a chord distance of 19.99 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of NW. 3rd Street; thence along said Westerly right-of-way S 00033'29"W, a distance of 14.48 feet; thence leaving said Westerly right-of-way along the Southerly and Westerly line of said easement the following Seventeen (17)courses; thence along a curve to the left, having an arc length of 18.61 feet, radius of 49.50 feet, a central angle of 21032'11", a chord that bears S 62056'15"W, a chord distance of 18.50 feet; thence S 52010'09" W a distance of 17.67 feet; thence along a curve to the right, having an arc length of 57.23 feet, a radius of 82.00 feet,a central angle of 39°59'12",a chord that bears S 72°09'45"W a distance of 56.07 feet; thence N 87"50'39"W a distance of 165.86 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right, having an arc length of 64.99 feet, radius of 107.03 feet, a central angle of 34°47'30",a chord that bears N 70*261431,W, a chord distance of 64.00 feet; Exhibit A-1,page 2 thence along a non-tangent curve to the left, having an arc length of 57.75 feet, radius of 108.32 feet, a central angle of 30032'47", a chord that bears N 71015'20"W, a chord distance of 57.07 feet; thence along a line, N 88058'48"W, a distance of 581.40 feet; thence N 88011'55"W a distance of 502.12 feet; thence along a curve to the right, having an are length of 20.88 feet, a radius of 237.00 feet, a central angle of 05002'54", a chord that bears N 85040'27"W a distance of 20.88 feet; thence N 83009'00"W a distance of 85.38 feet; thence along a curve to the left, having an arc length of 57.38 feet, a radius of 98.00 feet, a central angle of 33"32'52", a chord that bears S 80°04'34"W a distance of 56.56 feet; thence along a line, S 63018'08"W, a distance of 15.22 feet;; thence along a curve to the right, having an are length of 46.60 feet, a radius of 127.50 feet,a central angle of 20056'29", a chord that bears S 73"4622"W a distance of 46.34 feet; thence N 05045'01"W a distance of 14.00 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left, having an arc length of 14.90 feet, radius of 10.00 feet, a central angle of 85"20'33", a chord that bears N 4102543" E, a chord distance of 13.56 feet; thence N 01°14'34"W a distance of 233.89 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the right, having an arc length of 33.78 feet, radius of 107.00 feet, a central angle of 18*05'19", a chord that bears N 07048'04"E, a chord distance of 33.64 feet; thence along a reverse curve to the left, having an arc length of 13.51 feet, radius of 53.00 feet, a central angle of 14*36'11", a chord that bears N 09°32'38" E, a chord distance of 13.47 feet to a point on said Southerly right-of-way line of Broadway Avenue; thence along said Southerly right-of-way S 89°29'37" E, a distance of 14.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 28,156 square feet or 0.646 acres, more or less. �p.LLAAb 0� �G\ST�R ¢10/9/2025� It 107$6 � 74178 1 CJQ y G.VWV Exhibit A-1, page 3 0 I I O I MOa LV �F ey OR to° o g 0 Moa zo d � — �1S Qblf MN r �`, ° �;P CQ Moa Moa U S �� . y _i p C7 o -a U p�u•.;# ` OAS �. SON ee O I A ' 0 _ ? w Q- i0 ": &O ? W W —d— Vd— - —oO O I? a o0 in ({(O� Z_ r Q T N N �M{ N a p �• F Imi! O N OV O Nao W x co ° W 3 °o n rn m coo M y y Z Z Z y y Z Z Z �'3 Vd—-�_—Vd—__--M n a L OnC Y` o N O O O m H ecn a N f0 n co O a W (40 co V h m 1n O m Z N u7 V M ZF S W a p W U cn 'S WU' a m vNi - , N fA O d— ----Vd— V tl o Q O' N c0+, N n m r Q � r LL W O Z O I W ,•f7 v cm N b N O 1! m W O W W p a I U. t•^ 00 0 N ern tyi eon e+Mi N °o m rc Q� 4 /Y� lL F /d—_ __�r 3 prp y in cV O &y�+ ■ ■ [or � to Wo a 'S:- & Z II) 0 w o A o 0)OD co 0 Z O �>r a 0 o N a N o n tc 3 2 = Z � r r o \//\ L a OU U i� a Pn co io b b eo 2 t7 m N ea n m n m m n w Z Q -Vd—- - N Ir, e- J N "' N ,n O�• � ' r L1J a ow QI W + O N In V7 t• m lA O w w w w w cowJ Z v O O N N eOp inN [fin !� T. , Z Q Q N w` c0 O O Y m . ll1 Q en v N Cr1 m W fn Z Z y y y v°�i tmD 3 O O W n w y Z Z Z O a o c I U `*° c a ry L. tT. o o w Im 0 c x� O M I €V' U 2 n N m lV m m c6 I •% O� � U ol M r r r c _ zm z y .y - 4 (w7 m m v ram- enn w l m r e,•*'- 2 F ap < Y'i N O M N N O G lL Z W Vd—-- —Vd—-_—Vd—_ _ NJ r_ to Z H n o N N !n m N Z C7 N o a Z w V '�U , ti 0 °v m a N OW O o r r r M w en r d CD O�. N b b b b b b N clqm O O M & L~� �� co 1 `� Z,7 S01°14'34"E 225.25' k,•�c " M N N W CD ti _N01"14'34"W 233.89' _ v cl) coo m b » bM a —Ue` — . . .M C9 m cn en ap m a°fo a n o W r I•" O� W n N O N m O ISO um7 M OV N N a N O � r r W () N d a f U O IJf r N I U ROV7d11NOW3Mk,'e" �3 > N e' a ,n m n co w f I Ln rc U m U m z U �P'llglHk3-egPLOZLLL10y�1Aaxyied IR/l WM Ilaa-uYlpyey�g0U-LOZLZLILLOL1S1O31'Oad43 Exhibit A-1, page 4 m LaOm �m p E B a rc = ONW T 4 Z Z = w U Y N Z LLI p 2 w W U a w a � F Z g Q W = Q J Cw5 Y a LL Q L a V OD ® V W O LL LL n.im LU, Lit cq 1 o a P 0') H ® ® co Z • O W a rnau. s r�q 8 F O O 6 W Z W O LL® � a_ U ® J `Zo e Z Q W Q !-z Y "a �, m ^ o ® �-A °'PH PLI w o a Y� F OtoW ❑ Z p� xm�.ua Neu p U � E O o", �S.t Wp.OFpu w a 5 z 45kM�o-§ aQ W Z > Z J 0 m F F N> a J r O z F a 0 0 0 LL z O w O Q y v w w�Wp=oaz aa LL wWF > aZo w ow z 7 O ¢ Oa ap f0 FO ¢ a�op F y >R zz ~ O Z N0 " J a X 20 z 4' U' O 2 O Y — z a �N Z w Y m LL U O Z N N oW Z m OI 2j Exhibit B-1 , page 1 Nyy o��d OQ o a � n C m{ N b m � a _J e J W • LLI W g R S O rZ �`� : ! +�. : � g g ■ '� pew 2 s i 4 U W� u� J s Exhibit B-1, page 2 Nbti 0 AO I s � _e o � Q s a F � Q a a< lu 6 I n 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 4 x x g � x xX a J 0 Q ROD E J C J qJ J J J J J 1 CS" 8 Y b P O N Q A IV q R N $ gill a O Z C Z O_ I WEgeg O_ O Exhibit B-1, page 3 j Af W 441( �6@1�d c� Q I a es•w,w�:la F I _ LLI I l/d O o g w Z " � K I' OO XW III I o I � � I l/d ---� I X a N WI z p ib o f 1/d � w ❑'I a i LL a Ii 3 l/d _f j I W ¢ I o �8Ir mrzui ® it l0 lFz!.i Ild N IOkk, /ljp 00, Oil •SIB G bIZ O N I 1 C , 1 fY I G W a � c ^ W ~; av Wsi2ui o CL ¢nm a Z_ cc mNIN m av�izui I p a a Exhibit B-1,page 4 Nby n LL Ilid— lid lid lid— lid l/d— � LU W c3 LU I O } I � a gn a -lid i I I E l/d ; a Z ui l!d— lid lid it e f ZB BO+OZ:ld lid i lid lid lid lid ® . m T ,/d o xa I I Qua ■ _ lid — ---lidTod +ids �4 rt ¢x C lid Qz lx II WI I lid — ----� I I 0 8 3 Wi lid— ----y i B B Iz -lid 417, I as S m c 0 II Q � II I z � a I� U � f Match Line Sia.11+00 0 Exhibit B-1, page 5 tiyy = Q 0I0 rd&d O�t� gF p� g g u x m d� v F w o J_ w i m oILF6 O N N yl A - ll.l Cl u z o� oQW aa� Q�a zp �A NJ r� a 12 ME Q $ _ i z i w � z a to zct LI®RY I � �§ N — g cc U I pw 0 Exhibit B-1, page 6 4f Qy 6 Se Za �dObd O� J a O ram' �Fpy II i if O W y c a w _ U ' ffi I d m � m W gig �' 42 d i e � •g� a igF o a z z O d s a � 3 t g+� Lou 157 LUIN_ wT z lob x> W u m � A A N 20 O. ppp N w S ti Exhibit B-1, page 7 N� � 4t Q1,Q J !6 P o tl�V ID L41LL a O W Y H Z N 11 N � W N � � Q a a N x S S o rc x N ^ � a ^ � o � x N m /7/1� QK �OC4 ��0 3 LU LU 21 o � � m fq LL F jo Q Y ,�� zI k:t�b' A ZZ r5 p� �1c�(� F6 �Mmq.F4FFF � N dmo p7Jww wS•'a��tS� qp8 qp@qQ@ y�� w : p�1� WCj Z;2Z2 CIK C C Y Op Fw O O O O O F O2gw F F OF FO , da6 �glI l�1u 1rc E s a am ow m Exhibit B-1, page 8 .t'`O�1N6y oy�6 010 ii F s�a� LU a' c`S �rOaV O� 5 Z ? !oiPlo@C�oo � B I?I?�F�-r Lo i>� 2 0'ii i'mm l�m se $ $ $ g $ $ $ � $ g � < SNISVG O HOlvo 3au ti SIMNl tau CL SNOadtl Ky LL L Sxahro 133a !E it 33 33 i! b w xoe rrollvOalal sx3 sj 1121212 Q g $ 4 $ i a Z V xoe NOLLMJRRII.sxs� - C 0. mmmuVemosm -v3dA13lOHNYNOHNYW 3 a J I—T �� xoewouvexaal Sxs #t !3 13 '� Z lllJX8'dW00 i 1HxJ13H llld fL A3xsYO a3BB X R Q C YY t a w 4 MMIIM dO b► i< I J uw IL: i d NouvOlatll 0 ON smoorawm[aa a X X X X K X K X X X W e� 'aaOD1V:p19H X z-r ga 'aaO�aYxINNV'X -� auyoo X m Oz HLONM Nouw.xla w.— c w HlaO iC .j Aoa a NouV0naaOa O. _ •aaOO1VOMH K C! Ir z QQ.i a �aaoo winmv X i0 Q F[7Q o HLOKM F, k � is � l?, $ 'J' 8 i; o3LVQ0 X NouwrwaOO.— HLaO K} w N NOLLV*Uwo.—. z ^ g< ~ '13318 a3ZINIYWI'IV X ` n 8 13318 O3ZINVA7✓O x 3@Y S C) oAd 301w(nHo X T g 'UNIAAIOd 09 M q d (3dI3N3UHLiIA-KW X 1r1 J .~i 1-1 J J A 4 w LU o a F U Ci N A r N O 1� A w >r a zo �V iyygg O O g�OHffi3��d o~ � s Exhibit B-1, page 9 sc F F — — — — — — — — — A o as a � P s�S o � fBOLL N SLLIM . ^,Ff 1 (V �OLL - q tq i S� 1•y. l 1 jz ROW q 3AV AVMUVOUS 3 �' N N N N cm N N N w.. a 4— /NO i , g s Oj- �iqQII,IiPIL — Z- +ZSa3 ® J o:I w I oF_ 4 III1lll I Rid -- - - — ---{ ! '7 it If IIIIIIIII I J 1 w .. ( � . II III i�llllll ( wm zm ur� .�- ( �a � ( ,- IIIIIfIJII Ilif � I � -J I IIII I zllllillZ� ill I m l a w= . i lI �`�I III I � o ;ll �' \L° •I 1�I IIII I IJ%J- S N Q milli ( / Ov"OLMOA9�'� o I ' 7 00,99+0K Via so PIL — ssresz n� d PA. r� —R y� _ �pcp �fmL -a- N o m �p 1Lfn,0 ( —` ` N N N N N N N N No o_ Exhibit B-1, page 10 2 �iU m nq r r rd COS s�� m o 40 to �..� +L'nS eofl 4meW T N N g CJ N -cmN N C N N N O z ��` II i I�, II I�i jilt �'�- ����# � '• " II11 III ILI Q � �w.Gw:sw o I I I l l R — Id— LL ( i m.. II IIII ! r p 9)OVtZ.YMMANI (3)o�wsz.aranNl II13 , W'LBSZ:wRI �IIIIII�I I - - � W IWI SS SOSE 3DA8- 99-K-S—.sons', g � ( u �I flIIIIIII�, I i i o zazw lll'1III� �II�W Ada ( W N l :I� W ! ► %I I , Z d 1 1 OW BB'06W.l91M ANI ,LII�� JI1 l � >rosssz�wne I �,.I (3)CO'OBSS:A6NIANI r gg 71 Ol WIINVAME m lL'98.Z Vle BO �` ZO R lI 06 (3lzroerz:.o¢NI/WI —..I z I I a a a o m m v iv W Ln W CD ccpp W N N N N N N N N N N N N 2 Exhibit B-1,page 11 wl ID N O Co N O A7 06+ZL'BIS oun tPm i3 N C4 N Cm W IIII �- s :1111 III f I .Illl'J�II I a —l/d :,,�+1 I u'�asz aaet3 i I I d J I � .11;;� Y sraeseasne u WIM9:8one 'I x I `l:gll j I Ra$��II I UNI LL'taSL'aOC 2t10 ANI I � "11 41 YL'L85L:Bf NI M11 �I � � � �I„��.�II11 oa'lasz:►Wa !4•al+OL:Yla — taa:syz o �i � gip.''•f� ! � F ll�=l 11 I pi �Fw ke 1 d .1��!II11i11 a 9 Jill, a; illllll(I � I XI " III 'I II -� � ,► ,� , I ,IIII 1, g 'l l ! I , IIllil(lil i• III f is 'I I I I� I � —lld y_WYJ ' F sg Match Line Ste.7+30 g egp o o w ID N N N N N N N Cm N N N Exhibit B-1, page 12 � Ny � W 4 x � U ESP gfU JIM gpd�.L 1C8� 5 G G'd HS! hil $; .91 oil Irt it I I II o o C.jp� DC+Lt 149 GUn UWW fV N N N N N+ I CCa�'rL:iad13 I I —T � � 1 y et•ez.L�:san3 0 luxc \ ► 10 F aye CL ( a B�8I •! I�•!i'III(III��g � Z1'BBSL:30A8 -{ vd— — — —� I Ii I I I I III �rczwi•sans $ 4a l u I ��II�i llllll I W W m . a Ud— — — :a ' I�ill�IIII1111111 � 1 1 I , 1111j11f�' �' m m � � IIIIJI�II�jll�� I z. of I !41 Pz Ii 1I11' IIIIIII is �"' � AN o�W SYMBE: , �� �a III I ( Allal 111,11-tt Vic x m ;� IJllle �lljjl ~ ;, I Q� � . I ; I • IIIII �o O dl � ,IIlIIIII I F I + ,I IIIII;I1111111� � s II Ud- - - ' pl ,Jllillll�l I, . II16;,IIIIp1� acessz.aan3 1 n� � ��_ �� �•as•¢t:9aA3 0� ��W 'i O i► : I il�ll J'III II II � �� � �-! � o � � W ��II!`'I111111 I I I �B � � � . s • I I�IlI II :I �dY� 1 IIli,lllllll.I J heLu - +d- - - "7 Match Una Sta.12+30 C4 c " a N m w $ m- 21 NN wNm N N Nm Lk Exhibit B-1, page 13 a B s e g g oe Ito Pug a LLJ all sbI a I i N N N N N Ln N N N m^ t I g N �W M1 —lid— I a s3 �� F yZTm.trtlno:' O —lid "_ �. 67 d I ® (�1 K'LBSZj;�aLNi nhh .'�'g `� � ( cs�sszaon3 { � tii A C4 Ulel 00'OESZ:AB.Lno ml R� m (3):09100'.9t NIAN1 �.��• { � ti'C aeLs.at.sone i•x <�s s it � l gm� I 4 •g g gq DO U' 9Z 6Z mo nNl Z�rr (M1SLM9:.0EMMAN1 .L WMR:.MNIANI i f� C6'BLtSi � �®1 1 VIL g co +1 _ � m UW YB'Z05Z;.Bf 1f10 ANI• Wi . g I { (3)B0' 0PL85i'd1101 I I I II J I Q UTP+U vis IN r ! IS Match Line Ste.17+30 N N N N N N N _ - N N N N N N N g $� Exhibit B-1, page 14 Nyy r o� 4 W FFY W Hy 6 ° o F RISF F 6� pn 6 �y 15 IL 9 2a 4 Ito Aa �zl� rc �Q LL Q LL a F S g� Y X W �<w oil � e � m z 110 UI u WA T $ `• T9 y aL = z 'N QpF O w EAl`it'7.7=1;' 1�""�'w.w�xonn3a-mwf+�o,m�nwexrLrbar„unaa3a.u,x,w„w,wwwa�,un.mcvxL,mm, it ® ® & z �� k § � g�� i`§ § ■�■ - � a § � ■ � \ § � § � ■ 2 § & � � k / � § § ■ 2 � , ----« ■ � � 2 B R � � z o g k 0q/ § tea§ R§/ ■ e ■ � §■ §(� § | k§ §|� ■ ■ § § \7 | JL z § g § § � / ^ � § m ■ § | - I ® ! r- tz ■ � 0 § BBB § § § ■ �..._ . . . . � | !z Exhibit B\ page 16 y_ _ |o � | |U) 'Kf oo �. § § § 0. % §| 7 � � ■ § ■ § k k K § 241 | | | ko § 8 % � � /§ » � a 6 � § � e � K 3 § § N § ■ 7 § / — ! ° k | § f \ f �LLI g 2§ e f §2 g � § §s ƒ . < w . §§§ 2§ ■§ a . - ¢\§ . t) Zfb §IN � PIONIIIIIII • IT K _ | AT � ,k� Z ■ ■ � ■& | § k � $ § n 3 _ I %§ | | §IL 4 a §Ir| low- Exhibit � §§ 2 E & IeQ, pg !7 W t Nyy A-4 < =O U s V o rr�++ �n 11M5" s 2 z z S ' D1�d — Z u Id ul sr G .E fQ a Lu c d e O $ ww it n o tno d3{3C W w W F Q 6 , O 8 E d a f{ J OIL I witui � Q4 N W 7$ ? C LU Q� a a : NVVVV G �3 Q �,g z 08 OR zf ts u eTi W y N M 4 B :1e .0 1tl9M9-E :�. .iL lY NN'9•l fEno /Dl z dy Z o ^I .ZL iAM19-9 � C7 OTF tl� a�i�ry .L.L A yyQ J d3 y �i3 pa •�Q � 's'v lME=t tl illfi=z [[['(((•nn�-rrry...,,, 4 0. sz Nis. EF BY Las• HID Q e 4 4 Lr s <o r S k �lj E a § 0 2 PitIL 0g O e LOY.LI lY e F a F d CO �- •C aD '� 'b' j3 Nn 3 Si 1M_ IM •B a3y l- Lq5 21 o I s N .Dt9L S $ Exhibit B-1,page 18 ul TS ggE ° I Z Hl'J161 !2L—XI �y 5 wv "tt� P Man ra oilZ � � Lg a .r.wv ' reran f Q O `9, 6666w5� i tg 91 zi In ° Y V a m I o _ d 2 o<a } H yy� 6b bb a b bb III 6 8 O 8$ b gg4 � tl tl tl tl tl � tl tl tl - is b� d'31i'1r17u li3Hi WATT—WQTWiF-a ivw , Exhibit B-1,page 19 d o��2 f9 N m LL LL b Ip tR m IJ b�m.. bseog He �o' lid- - - -lid i o 1I _ g 90 � z CZ III a LIS ;a z- d-- —lk}--�'�. \ Q � ai S a � a ai— � � I O CIO) ,4a a� � lip � ° I lid— — — —� —Vd— — — d—�— — I � lid— - - va � Vd— — o' �i e G Exhibit B-1, page 20 s Ls y e e o i of a 4Csg6� z F � W T �_16 W yObtl�"p0 °S+L'Ws Sun LPWW z I � LU � Jill ifII Q Ud— — — —Ud— — — —Ud —Ud � — — — w I I�I I IIII I'I W a a I I� ' IIIIIi11�I II W � ,II�.IIII�I II i Q t � III II III II I !� IIII II 111� Ei U u, -, .a � —==Ud— - _ —Ud— III�IoI b ;�III�IIIfiI��f k 't ��l► gllll I�1�" 4 III!I 111171 �� a of � .n II llllll �roh� QaQ ¢Q Ud— — —.r.Vd— �11d_— — — ELt —` oa-aal� .�oo.ioc� ... I _ _ ... �g I . Qi a � � � 1 I � � I I ' I Exhibit B-1, page 21 � Nyy s 8 w 3 yoLO del p�?2 ftL oe+t t`eiS ERBNV a 2 —Vd I I J a ! a a a ! Il'II ,I ! Il ; a 4.' I I �,��Illlll� I J W� Ix yG,�I�Ii;I,4 Q �I! -,IJlill! { I I Jill° Q( o A �,II I IIII JJJ r 1> 1 I /rl al I II II + Ijlllill IN 5 W ill ►�I � , Illlllli� j � i IL � IIlflllll Match line Sta.7+30 3 o u-- — z Exhibit B-1, page 22 Ilk it Q ' ass w 3 ��rd �LL LL LL � 1 LLpLL O O Ili® a OS+u,ms wn 4PoW / w � 1 Vd— a III , ;I I rl IIII' �III, I II � e f I IIII I .! I I � I I �II'il I� I I a I I lilli�l lip l �� I I• qa:Q Vd— — — �--; i illl� 111111 e I f � I O I Z:�..illlll � Ud— — — — � � IIII (lllll'Ifl � l r .o Ii IIIII IIIIIIl. �� I I �W Ix a LF JIII�I III, I Ii� ; I i 2 W g I' �iil��lllllllll I I = x IIII�I II � � I O Ix i. ,�IIIII°I ell I W ° _ Match uw Sla 12+30 z �a a Exhibit B-1, page 23 a $ q le mq CO e d z ° n �fa ssa � �rt:l` a Q a-1 a CK S w a IL d— I —Vd— lee a � I a f- I I I I J I 7 a f I I ® w ++I +I a —r- - -Vd— L — IEP__ �O 18CWCNW Z / O ---EP— + I f r- 3 ��. ` oFW 10 zo Qa `"zp �r 1I = 00 � n , Et; L Match Line 17+30 =°z Exhibit B-1, page 24 A� cr§ „ _ ■ mp@ & k |R � § § § « 2 < _ o 104 2 2 § 2$ S <I ■ ■ ■ ■ m . _ . . x � ■ ■■ ■ � A � � � k � # B � it § � § § $ ■ � � 222 . § o K } B § ■ §�� 0 e |7 t K§ 506 0 § §§/ �$ § ■§ 2§� � JQ §& § §� ■�J § �� E§ ��� ■ 2 � �s . & ! §L -■| R | K � ) � § || 2 ■ ƒ \ �� § ■ �k� § B ■ ,| ■0 § ■ k§ @fir �2 J • .§ e ■!® -- ■ ® e P 0 §b § § §§§ k| |§ E§|& B § § I Exhibit BG, page 25 Nyy P m $ mg ,mr R I � I 1 w LU it p ' OTC: z OI } U OrOtl I i � H ' a I I O J_ I �I ti awl °° ® ' I z O r O<w —Vd— — --,-l/d —lld�_— XPg I x �oewr u .t fA ~' v *+ I I Z ro - b Exhibit B-1,page 26 Nyy w � �bc mad Y � W OIU p W! m U Y I $ a a 0 o w f o Q � , a a ^- — — —-11 d— — V d—I— — —V d— —V d— E— _ a a a 1 I , I I I I � a ( I I I Pa IS ONE MN— -Ev .�.==--EP+ �-- - --Ea OEd� yf Vd— — Vd —Vd— l - � J' Q Q —Vd— — Ip l VI r ,����✓�/- 11I e • t —._.. -..— _ �. �• r .:i=� ...�i� IIItIl11, I , II� � �2: � s� f� >� -1 III I�It ; a �:I 1 1 tll I� i l�Ili I� Exhibit B-1, page 27 E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: November 18, 2025 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline Item #12: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (H-2025-0045) Application(s): Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Summary of Request: The City of Meridian Planning Division is applying for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT). The proposed CPAT request would accomplish the following: 1. Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024); 2. Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees study (September 16, 2022), and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein; 3. Amend the “List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference” including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced; and 4. Amend Plan “Appendix A. Glossary of Terms” to add/modify language. Written Testimony: None since the P&Z hearing on October 16, 2025. Commission Recommendation: The Commission recommended the application be forwarded to City Council for approval. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on October 16, 2025. At the public hearing the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject application, H-2025-0045. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: i. In favor: No testimony provided. ii. In opposition: No testimony provided. iii. Commenting: No testimony provided iv. Written testimony: No testimony provided. v. Staff presenting application: Carl Anderson presented the application. vi. Other Staff commenting on application: Caleb Hood 2. Key issues(s) of public testimony: i. None. 3. Key issues(s) of discussion by Commission: i. Discussion was had related to the distinction between the City’s Capital Financial Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Plans (CIP). The CFP has more than the CIP for impact fees, the CIP is incorporated as part of the CFP. ii. Questions related to the terminology between Capital Improvement Program vs Plan. Staff clarified that staff recommend changing from program to plan to be consistent with both State and City practice, and that program was likely a carryover from past practice. iii. Questions related to the frequency of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan were brought forward. Staff clarified that timing is generally as needed. 4. Commission change(s) to Staff recommendation: The Commission included staff’s recommendation to include a change to “Appendix A. Glossary of Terms” to add/modify language, specifically related to the current definition of Capital Improvement Program. While not as originally drafted and noticed for the Planning & Zoning Commission, it was recommended that the Commission further modify the definition below to amend all references from the existing language of “Program” to “Plan”. This amendment would further improve consistency and reduce potential confusion. The Commission’s motion included staff’s recommended to further modify the language from “program” to “Plan”. The amended language is included on page 5 of this report and also in Attachment B2. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: i. None. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2025-0045, as presented in the staff report during the hearing on November 18, 2025: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2025-0045, as presented during the hearing on November 18, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2025-0045to the hearing date of (Date) for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) 2025 Comprehensive Plan Text November 18, 2025City Council0045-2025-H Amendment Overview 4. Amend Plan “Appendix A. Glossary of Terms” to add/modify language. are referenced; and minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies 3. Amend the “List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference” including incorporated therein; (September 16, 2022), and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as 2. Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees study Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024); and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) 1. Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital amendment. adopted after the ordinance would need to be To collect an impact fee an the Comprehensive Plan . included as an element of impact fee CIPs be Idaho Code requires Meridian Comprehensive Plan. and impact fee studies into the the County’s EMS and Jail CIPs The request would incorporate *Institutional$361 *Institutional$104*Industrial$163*Industrial$47*Office$364*Office$105*Retail$944*Retail$273Nonresidential (per 1000 square foot)Nonresidential (per 1000 square foot)Family (per unit)-Multi–Residentia l $357Family (per unit)-Multi–Residential $121Family (per unit)-Single–Residential $516Family (per unit)-Single–Residential $175JailParamedicsTable 2: Ada County Proposed Impact Fees 2024)County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and Ada Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Studies by Reference”. table titled “List of Adopted Plans and 2004 (Attachment A.8) will be included the -amended CIP as adopted by Ordinance 22Development Impact Fee Study and Should this request be approved, the Plan. as an element of the County Comprehensive incorporate the capital improvement plans 6501, must -to Idaho Code Section 67undertake comprehensive planning pursuant entities (such as the City of Meridian), that Under Idaho State Law, governmental Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated thereinImpact Fees study (September 16, 2022), and Amended The 2019 Meridian Comprehensive Plan (the Plan) is integrated with a Amend the “List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference”Destination Downtown Eastern Treasure Valley Electric PlanFuture additions may includeJail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee StudyEMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee StudyDevelopment Impact Fees Study (2022)Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Plan (2018)Include the following planning documents:Update reference to most current of a plan/studyversion of the plan/study is referenced. Add note to City led planning efforts to ensure the most recent Amend the title from “Adopted” to “Incorporated”.reference”. series of plans and studies which are listed as “being adopted by Amend Plan “Appendix A. Glossary of Terms” to add/modify language.Glossary of Terms)(Appendix A. Comprehensive Financial Plan (CFP).to the Capital Improvements Plan, as the The City of Meridian refers management programs. are a primary tool of most growth ProgramsPlanscompletion of the project. Capital Improvement responsible for the project, and the time frame for to finance the project, the agency or department project, the cost of the project, the source of funds address the type of project, the location of the (CIP) must ProgramPlanCapital Improvement year increments with annual updates. A -done in fivetypically plans areisprogrammingimprovement serve existing and anticipated development. Capital that a jurisdiction will need to construct in order to of identifying and budgeting for the public facilities A process -ProgramPlanCapital Improvement o A. Glossary of Terms) (Appendix need, benefit, and proportionality.to legal standards that satisfy three key tests: or maintenance costs. Impact fees are subject used for capital improvements, not operating jurisdiction. By law, impact fees can only be development projects or even the entire improvements that serve multiple payments used to construct system time -Are one-Impact Fees NEW* o Notification & Comment Nextdoor PSA9/25/202510/31/2025property owners within 300’Notification mailed to N/AN/AN/AnewspaperNotification Published in 9/30/202511/01/2025Agency Notice9/23/2025-Site posting dateN/ANeighborhood MeetingN/AdatePreapplication Meeting 259/4/20DescriptionDetailsDateZoning Posting Planning & Posting DateCity Council Modeling Review. Wastewater Modeling Review & Water -Public Works Agency CommentsNonePublic Comments: Comments Request and Next Steps for approval. 0045 to Council -2025-Amendment, Hproposed Comprehensive Plan Text The Commission recommended the application on October 16, 2025. Commission heard the subject The Meridian Planning & Zoning  w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) (H-2025- 0045) by City of Meridian Planning Division, located City Wide Application Materials: https:Hbit.ly/H-2025-0045 A. Request: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) to Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and the Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024), Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein, Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference" including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced and Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to add/modify language. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: November 18, 2025 ITEM # 12 PROJECT NAME: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment CPAT (H-2025-0045) 1 wish to testify Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing (mark X (Please Print) HOA? if yes) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Public Hearing for Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) (H- 2025-0045) by City of Meridian Planning Division, located City Wide A. Request: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT) to Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024) and the Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024), Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein, Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference" including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced and Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to add//modify language. Lorcher: All right. We have one more item on the agenda tonight, which is H-2025- 0045. It's a Comprehensive Plan text amendment from the City Planning Division and as soon as Carl is ready we will begin. Anderson: All right. Good evening, Madam Chair -- Lorcher: Good evening. Anderson: -- Members of the Commission. My name is Carl Anderson. I'm a long range associate planner here at the City of Meridian. Tonight before you I have a -- I'm presenting a city-initiated text amendment to the city's Comprehensive Plan and I will briefly cover the four items that are contained within this request. So, the first item before you is an adoption --the city is recommending to adopt Ada county's capital improvement plan and development impact fee studies from 2024 for EMS and jail services. The city has been working with Ada county as they are going through their process to conduct their capital improvement plan development impact fee studies. This is an item that was presented before City Council on June 17th by city staff outlining what that process would look like. This is, essentially, that step to be -- that's outlined in the memo that's attached to your staff report with an attachment B1. So, this is the public hearing that would be required to adopt these capital impact fees and development impact fees into the City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan, so that the city can collect development impact fees on behalf of Ada county for these services as identified. Idaho Code requires that if we are going to be collecting impact fees that these documents be included within the Comprehensive Plan. I will back up really quick. So, this table here does show what some of those impact fees would be. This does not -- this would not be the final step in the city's process to collect those impact fees. An ordinance would need to be adopted by the city and once that is -- that stuff's complete, then, the authorizing authority would be there to collect those impact fees. The second item here is to adopt by reference the City of Meridian's development impact fees and capital improvement plan. Similarly under Idaho State Code for entities that conduct comprehensive planning under Idaho State Code, they need to incorporate these documents within the city's Comprehensive Plan in order to collect development impact fees. Should this item and the previous item just discussed be recommended for approval they would be included in the city's list of adopted plans or incorporated plans and studies by the City of Meridian and within the table which I will cover here next. So, the third item that the city is recommending amendment to -- some of this is grants, some of these are items that were presented to the Commission earlier this year when we are amending the city's area of city impact and I will go over those. Some new ones are --the first here is to amend the title from adopted to incorporated. It's a little bit of semantics, but this is, in essence, not for those plans or studies that may not be necessarily adopted, but are referenced herein and are incorporated and necessary for the city's planning efforts, but still included. On the city's side we are looking at potentially updating some city's websites to track those resolution numbers for when those items are adopted and tracking them in that manner. Additionally we are recommending adding a note to city lead planning efforts to ensure most recent version plan or study is what has been included in the city's Comprehensive Plan, so that we are not necessarily having to conduct a Comprehensive Plan text amendment for every single one of those items once a new plan is amended. That note is added to those city led documents and so it's referring to the most recent version as adopted, which would be by resolution and so the way that would work is that -- as we are doing now when we have kind of a list of them we bring them all forward to clean that up in the future. Additionally -- so, this is similar to what we talked about earlier this year, but adopt -- update the reference -- excuse me -- update the reference, the most current plans or studies, within that table. So, we are referring to the most recent plans. There are several items that are underlying and strike through in your attachments showing what the most current version of those items are. We are adding four new ones for you. First one here being Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility, City of Meridian planning document here led by the Public Works Department from 2018. Again, City of Meridian's development impact fee study would be included, as well as Ada County EMS and jail capital improvement plans and development impact fee studies. Future additions that the Commission may see are the addition and update to the eastern Treasure Valley election plan. The plan still makes reference to the prior version. There is a more recent version. Part of the reason that this has not been recommended to be brought forward at this time is this is something that the staff's understanding is that Council has not yet had their eyes on and staff's recommendation that once the Council has had an opportunity to review those changes, then, it be brought forward before being brought into the plan. Similarly, Meridian City Council is working with Meridian Development Corporation, MDC, on the update to their development Destination Downtown plan. It's possible that when that effort is complete that we would, then, come back and update the plan as well. But the version that we are still referencing is the prior version of the destination downtown plan. Also you will notice that one of those is being deleted -- there were duplicates of this item, so we are deleting the duplicate. And, finally, as again some housekeeping here, but amending the glossary as attached to the Comprehensive Plan. The first item here is adding a clarification to the capital improvement program. So, the capital improvement program the language program I do believe is some of vestigial prior efforts towards capital improvement planning referred to this as program and I believe this is a carry forward from higher comprehensive plans. You will notice in the staff report that while it was not noticed this way, the Commission may wish to amend the language program to plan to be consistent with both state code and the language that we are proposing here today as well. That would need -- if the Commission is desirous of doing -- so, you would need to include that within your motion. But the text that's being added is the City of Meridian refers to capital improvement plan as the comprehensive financial plan. That's a practice that is reflected in the -- excuse me -- in the attachment for the city's development impact fees and amended capital impact fees and, finally, we are adding a reference for impact fees. This was pulled from the city's development back fee study to be consistent with those planning documents and also to provide reference for what impact fees are and what they do. All noticing requirements for tonight's application have been met. Staff has not received any public comment, either written or phone call, and the agency comments that have been received were from Public Works Department and they are not opposed to this request. With that I'm happy to stand for questions that the Commission may have. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendment and -- Lorcher: Commissioners, do we have any questions or -- questions or comments for Carl? Perreault: Madam Chair? Lorcher: Commissioner Perreault. Perreault: Could you go back to the last slide and am I reading correctly -- oh, sorry. The next one. Am I reading correctly that the CFP is the vehicle being used to identify the capital improvement program -- essentially CFP is the vehicle that's being used, right, to -- to make those determinations. I mean I understand what the CFP is, but am I understanding this correctly that there isn't another document called the capital improvement program and that it would just be the CFP that would be linked to this and how does that work, because the CFP is constantly changing, so is it -- is it being adopted? I mean typically we don't adopt the CFP as an -- as an actual financial tool at budget time. So, how is that going to work? Anderson: Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair, Commissioner Perreault. So, this is staff's understanding -- and my institutional knowledge is somewhat, but when reviewing the documents that was adopted by ordinance for the development impact fee study and capital improvement plan amendments for the city, it does make reference to the practice that the City of Meridian does operate under, which is our capital financial plan also serves as the capital improvement plan. I don't know -- and this is where Caleb may jump in here as well to provide some clarification. But the document that would be adopted within the comprehensive plan is the attachment, not the necessarily regularly, as you mentioned, amended CFP. Hood: Madam Chair, Commissioner Perreault -- and, Commissioner Perreault, I would almost put it the other way. It's just hard. It's just -- yeah, I said it, just do stuff. I would almost state it the other way. So, our CFP has more than the CIP for the impact fees; right? But we put the CIP in our CFP, but it has things that change on a yearly basis based on department needs and whatnot. So, the CFP is larger than the CIP. The CIP, though, is incorporated as part of the CFP is how I would phrase that I guess. Smith: Madam Chair? Lorcher: Commissioner Smith. Smith: I apologize if this is -- I just -- my blood sugar's low or something. But the terminology capital improvement program to plan, could you -- could you just kind of clarify. Is it -- has it been the improvement program and you were asking if we want to change that plan to conform with the other language? Anderson: Thank you, Madam Chair, Commissioner Smith. So, in order to be consistent with all the other terminology, because there are several running around, vetting it again we would have changed program to plan. We missed it and it was not noticed that way. We would recommend changing it -- program to plan in order to be consistent with the practice and also with state code. Program I do believe is from prior practice. Lorcher: Okay. Commissioners, any other questions? Perreault: Madam Chair? Lorcher: Commissioner Perreault. Perreault: Is there -- is this done at regular intervals? Is there -- is there planned intervals at which these are -- that we are updating the CFP or the -- comp plan and adding these? Is it because we are like, you know, 2025 and we did it five years ago and we have five more years, is that kind of the timing of this? But there is, obviously, some documents that have a couple years age. So, I'm just curious the timing. Hood: Madam Chair, Commissioner Perreault, no, there isn't a true -- timing is just sort of as needed. In fact, Carl's working on the next one now, so you will probably see something here in the next -- next year sometime anyways. You know, the county's requests kind of -- some of these are a little more administrative kind of cleanup things that probably wouldn't have risen to the level of a separate standalone application, but it's like, well, while we are at it let's just go ahead and sort of add these other scrivener type of cleanup things to the Comprehensive Plan. We do look at and have a program, though, internally with all departments to send the applicable policies in the Comprehensive Plan annually. Here are the policies in the comp plan. Is this still what you are doing, what we should be doing? Do we need to look at updating any of them? So, there is a calendar to this, but we don't have a set schedule of when we do comp plan text amendments. Lorcher: All right. To move forward. Carl, you are the applicant in this particular scenario; correct? Anderson: Yes, Madam Chair, that's correct. Lorcher: So, we are in public testimony. Madam Clerk, is there anybody else that are in Chambers that wish to testify? Lomeli: Thank you, Madam Chair. Lorcher: Or on Zoom? Lomeli: No one has signed up. Lorcher: Okay. So, were there any follow-up thoughts that you wanted to provide before we close the public hearing? Anderson: No, Madam Chair. Thank you. Lorcher: All right. May I get a motion to close the public hearing, please? Garrett: So moved. Smith: Second. Lorcher: It's been moved and seconded to close the hearing for the Comprehensive Plan text amendment -- Hood: Madam Chair, sorry to interrupt. I don't know if they want to say anything, but -- Lorcher: I looked at them and they didn't -- Hood: They would nod -- they shook their head? Okay. Sorry to interrupt. Lorcher: Is it good? Okay. It's been moved and seconded to close the public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan text amendment. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT. Lorcher: I think this is an administrative tool to be able to comply with things as they change in our city and impact fees and programs and plans and to keep the language all together. I'm -- you know, you said this is the first step. It goes to City Council after this to -- to go forward. I don't see any challenges in here that were obvious that would make me not want to approve this amendment. Garrett: I concur. Lorcher: So, with that did you want to say anything? Smith: You are good. Lorcher: Okay. So, after considering all staff, applicant and public testimony I move to recommend File No. H-2025-0045 as presented during the hearing of October 16th with no changes. Stoll: Second. Lorcher: It's been moved and seconded to -- Smith: Madam Chair? I think there was the request to change program to plan for language conformity. Lorcher: It was in the -- wasn't it in the -- Smith: Sorry to interrupt the motion, I just wanted to make sure we -- again, sorry, maybe I'm -- Lorcher: It was in the report, wasn't it? Smith: It was in, but we were asked to because it wasn't noticed of -- Lorcher: Okay. Considering all staff, applicant and public testimony I move to recommend File No. H-2025-0045 as presented during the hearing of October 16th, with the request to change plan -- program to plan to conform to other documents published. Stoll- Second. Lorcher: It's been moved and seconded to approve the text amendment. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Motion carries. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT. Lorcher: I will take one more motion. Stoll: Move to adjourn. Smith: Second. Lorcher: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. Any opposed? Motion carries. Thank you very much, everyone. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8.00 P.M. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �E DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT �✓ �r HEARING DATE: 11/18/2025 as 0 TO: Mayor&City Council L16 ss 55 FROM: Carl Anderson, Long-Range Associate Planner 208.489.0328 cnderson@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: City of Meridian Planning Division 4 SUBJECT: H-2025-0045 Legend 2025 Comprehensive Plan Text AOCI Amendment County — ss LOCATION: Citywide Line Future Road I. SUMMARY A. Summary The City of Meridian Planning Division is applying for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT). The proposed CPAT request would accomplish the following: 1. Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study(May 24,2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study(May 24,2024); 2. Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees study(September 16,2022), and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein; 3. Amend the"List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference"including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced; and 4. Amend Plan"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"to add/modify language. B. Issues/Waivers None C. Recommendation Staff recommended approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment. Commission Recommendation: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this application on October 16, 2025. The Commission recommended the application be forwarded to City Council for approval. See Section VI. Action for additional information. City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long range Division Page 1 of 11 II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Process &Notification Details Description Details Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Preapplication Meeting date 9/4/2025 Neighborhood Meeting N/A Site posting date N/A Agency Notice 9/23/2025 - Notification Published in newspaper 9/30/2025 11/01/2025 Notification mailed to property N/A N/A N/A owners within 300' Nextdoor PSA 9/25/2025 10/31/2025 Note:This table is informational only. See Laser ache for project noticing. III. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Project Overview&Request The City of Meridian is initiating an amendment to the text of the Meridian Comprehensive Plan (Plan)to adopt by reference the Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs)and impact fee studies for the Ada County Jail and EMS. The amendment will also include the adoption by reference of the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees study(September 16, 2022),and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein. Also included are minor amendments to Plan policy text, amending the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies By Reference" as well as the"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"to add/modify language. Each of the proposed amendments are further described in sections IIIA.1 —IIIA.4. A.1 Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study(May 24,2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study(May 24,2024) The City of Meridian has been receptive in working with Ada County and Ada County Emergency Medical Services District("District")to implement countywide development impact fees. More specifically,the County and District are desirous of adopting a countywide development impact fees to partially fund the coroner,jail, and EMS related capital improvements associated with new development. The background of this work is further described in Attachment B.1 to this report. The subject request will complete"step 2"as outlined in the memorandum("memorandum") dated June 17,2025 (Attachment B.1). "Step 1"as outlined in the memorandum has been complete as evidenced by Attachments A.4 and A.6.Additionally,as identified as"step 2a"in the memorandum,the Ada County/Ada Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee has forwarded its written comments to the City which may be found in Attachment A.3. As the subject intergovernmental agreements were approved,the request is to consider the CIPs in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act„ outlined in"step 2b"and"step 2c"as identified in the subject memorandum. The CIPs themselves may be found at the following links for further review: LINK:EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Stud X LINK:Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee StudX City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 2 of 11 Should future impact fees be adopted,the maximum supportable development impact fees for Jail and EMS services are as follows: Table 2: Ada County Proposed Impact Fees Jail Paramedics Residential—Single-Family(per unit) $516 Residential—Single-Family(per unit) $175 Residential—Multi-Family(per unit) $357 Residential—Multi-Family(per unit) $121 Nonresidential(per 1000 square foot) Nonresidential(per 1000 square foot) *Retail $944 *Retail $273 *Office $364 *Office $105 *Industrial $163 *Industrial $47 *Institutional $361 *Institutional $104 Please refer to page 6 on each of the subject(Jail&EMS)Capital Improvement Plans and Development Impact Fee Studies (Attachments A5 and A7; linked above). Should the City choose to adopt the subject CIPs,impact fees will not be immediately collected as there are additional actions that would need to take place which are further expanded upon in the memorandum. Staff are not proposing to adopt the CIP for the coroner-related facilities at this time, as these are not explicitly delineated in Idaho Code section 67-8203(24)(f). It is staff s understanding that the County intends to work with the legislature3 next session to reference coroner facilities in the statute. Should the subject CIPs be adopted by the City,they would be adopted by reference and included in the table titled"List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference". See also section A3 of this staff further detailing proposed amendments to the subject table. A.2 Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees study(September 16, 2022),and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein Under Idaho State Law, governmental entities (such as the City of Meridian),that undertake comprehensive planning pursuant to Idaho Code Section 67-6501,must incorporate the capital improvement plans as an element of the County Comprehensive Plan. The City of Meridian is proposing to incorporate capital improvement plans and impact fee studies by reference in the 2019 Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Should this request be approved,the Development Impact Fee Study and amended CIP as adopted by Ordinance 22-2004 (Attachment A.8)will be included the table titled"List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference". See also section A.3 of this staff further detailing proposed amendments to the subject table. A.3 Amend the"List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference" The 2019 Meridian Comprehensive Plan(the Plan)is integrated with a series of plans and studies which are listed as"being adopted by reference"by the City, are enumerated on page C of the Plan itself,and Exhibit A.9 of this report. Each of these planning efforts support and contribute to the Plans overall vision and planning requirements. The intent of this update is primarily conduct a cleanup to the plan and ensure that the subject table and related planning efforts remain current. The proposed amendments are enumerated below and found in Attachment A.9. The first item initially proposed is to reword the Title of the Table from"List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference"and remove the wording"adopted"and replace with"incorporated". This is intended to reflect that it is possible that not all plans listed have been formally adopted, primarily City led planning efforts,but are still integral to the Plan and are thus incorporated with the plan. City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 3 of 11 Similar to the Plan itself,many of these planning efforts are regularly updated to remain current and responsive to the existing conditions and needs of residents. The City has identified that there are multiple plans/studies listed which are no longer the most current plan/study of its scope. Plans of note include, and may not be limited to (plans/studies are linked to the text below): UPDATE—Existing: • Meridian Water Master Plan o The current version of this plan is the 2025 Water Master Plan, completed in February of 2025. The prior version of this plan is listed as the City of Meridian Water Master Plan (2018). • Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan o The current version of this plan is the 2022 Ada County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, completed in April 2023. The prior version of this plan is listed in the table as Ada County Hazard Mitigation Plan(2017). • City of Meridian Collection System Master Plan o The most current version of this plan is the 2023 Collection System Master Plan Update completed in November of 2023 and approved by the State of Idaho in 2024. The prior version of this plan is listed in the table as the City of Meridian Collection System Master Plan(2017). • City of Meridian Strategic Plan o The most current version of this plan is the City of Meridian Strategic Plan 2020-2025. The prior version of this plan is listed in the table as the City of Meridian Strategic Plan(2016- 2020). • City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan o The Most current version of this plan is the City of Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update 2023. The prior version of this plan is listed in the table as the City Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan(2015). • Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan o The current version of this plan is the 2024 Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Transportation Plan with the lead agency being ACHD. The prior version of this plan is listed as the Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan(2012). • Meridian Water Conservation Plan o The current version of this plan is the 2023 Meridian Water Conservation Plan. The prior version of this plan is listed as the Meridian Water Conservation Plan(2011). UPDATE—Addition: • Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Plan(2018) o The current version of the plan is the Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility (2018). This plan is conducted was conducted for the City of Meridian by Brown and Caldwell. The identified primary purpose of this document is to prepare and evaluate treatment system expansion alternatives and recommended options and planning level costs to guide the City in future capital improvements planning. The secondary purpose of the document is to prepare the documentation necessary for the City to present for regulatory authority approval. • Development Impact Fees Study(2022) o The current version of the study is the 2022 Development Impact Fees Study and Amended CIPs as prepared by DP Guthrie, LLC.Please refer to Attachment A.9 and Section A2 of this report for further background on the subject study. • EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 4 of 11 o The current version of the study is the EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study as prepared by TischlerBise, May 2024. Please refer to Attachments A.3, A4, and AS and Section Al of this report for further background on the subject study and CIP. • Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study o The current version of the study is the Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study as prepared by TischlerBise,May 2024. Please refer to Attachment A.3, A.4, and A.5 and Section Al of this report for further background on the subject study and CIP. Future Potential Action: • Eastern Treasure Valley Electric Plan o The current version of this plan is the Eastern Treasure Valley Electric Plan 2023-2024 Update. The prior version of this plan is listed as the Eastern Treasure Valley Electric Plan(2012). Be advised that staff are not recommending the inclusion of this Plan,until such time Council has had the opportunity to review the most current version of the plan. • Destination Downtown o The current Destination Downtown Plan was adopted by the Meridian Development Corporation in 2024. (Note: The 2024 Destination Downtown Plan is not located on MDC's website and therefore has not been linked herein). The prior version of this plan was completed in 2010.Staff are not recommending the inclusion of this Plan, as Council is currently reviewing the updated Destination Downtown Plan. This plan may be brought forward to be included in the Meridian Comprehensive Plan at a future date. A.4 Amend Plan"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"to add/modify language. As a minor cleanup to the Plan, staff are recommending an amendment to"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"to add/modify language. The specific modifications are as follows: • The following amendment is intended to reflect the City of Meridian's practice of the Comprehensive Financial Plan(CFP)being the Capital Improvements Plan(CIP). This is intended to provide guidance on any needed future interpretation. The addition is shown as green,underlined text below. Please also refer to Attachments A8 and A10 for a review of the text amendment as proposed. While not as originally drafted and noticed for the Planning&Zoning Commission, it was recommended that the Commission further modify the definition below to amend all references from the existing language of"Program"to"Plan". This amendment would further improve consistency and reduce potential confusion. The Commission's motion included staff s recommended to further modify the language from"program"to "Plan". The text below includes staff s original proposed language in green,underlined text. The blue underlined and red strikethrough includes the Commission's recommendation for Council. o Capital Improvement Plan Program-A process of identifying and budgeting for the public facilities that a jurisdiction will need to construct in order to serve existing and anticipated development. Capital improvement Plans are is typically done in five-year increments with annual updates. A Capital Improvement Plan Program(CIP)must address the type of project,the location of the project,the cost of the project,the source of funds to finance the project, the agency or department responsible for the project, and the time frame for completion of the project. Capital Improvement Plans Pregrams are a primary tool of most growth management programs. The City of Meridian refers to the City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 5 of 11 Capital Improvements Plan, as the Comprehensive Financial Plan(CFP). (Appendix A. Glossary of Terms) • NEW-In order to provide clarity for future use of the Plan related to the practice of collecting impact fees, as well as to further inform the proposed amendments herein, staff are recommending the inclusion of the term"Impact Fee". The proposed term was pulled Appendix A8 to remain consistent with existing City documentation. See below for the proposed amendment and Attachment A10 for additional information. o Impact Fees-Are one-time payments used to construct system improvements that serve multiple development projects or even the entire jurisdiction. By law, impact fees can only be used for capital improvements,not operating or maintenance costs. Impact fees are subject to legal standards that satisfy three key tests: need,benefit, and proportionality. (Appendix A. Glossary of Terms) B. Comprehensive Plan Analysis B.1 Future Land Use Map Designation (https:llmeridiancitE.or lcommunitE-developmentIplannin /�prehensive plan/future-land-use- mi� Review: This application does not include any modifications to the future land use map.As such, no specific analysis is provided for the proposed changes. B.2 Comprehensive Plan Policies(https:llmeridianciU.orglimplementationtable.aspx) Review: The Following policies are found to be relevant to the proposed amendment: 2.05.01D Coordinate planning efforts and strategic growth of the City with other service providers and local decision-makers. Review: The City of Meridian regularly endeavors to coordinate planning efforts and strategic growth of the City with other service providers. The proposed amendments to the Plan further support this policy through the adoption of the Ada County's CIP and Development Impact Fee Studies to facilitate the provision of services to residents in both Ada County and the City.Additionally,the incorporation of supporting plans and studies into the Plan furthers this policy. 3.01.01B Update the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code as needed to accommodate the community's needs and growth trends. Review: The update to the Plan as proposed services to accommodate the community's needs and growth trends. The proposed amendments to the Plan further support this policy through the adoption of the Ada County's CIP and Development Impact Fee Studies to facilitate the provision of services, accommodating growth trends and needs of the community. Additionally,the incorporation of supporting plans and studies into the Plan furthers this policy to ensure that the Plan and supporting documents remain relevant. 3.01.01E Coordinate with the City of Nampa, Canyon County, Star,Eagle,Kuna,Boise, and Ada County on land use,transportation, and emergency services. Review: The proposed adoption of Ada County's CIP and Development Impact Fee studies for EMS and Jail services support this policy and reflect the ongoing coordination between the City of Meridian and Ada County. 3.02.01 Develop and implement master plans for all public facilities, services, and safety to guide the growth of the City. Review: The proposed amendments as described in Section A of this report support the implementation of the City's and partner agencies,master plans pertaining to guiding growth and the provision of public facilities, services and safety. City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 6 of 11 3.03.03A Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development." Review: This policy is generally enforced during the development review process. The proposed amendment to ensure that the most recent plans and studies are incorporated into the Plan further the advancement of this policy. B. Municipal Code&Unified Development Code(UDC)Analysis Comprehensive plan amendments-Title 11 Chapter 5B Section 7. Review: The following contains a review of Meridian City Code, Title 11, Chapter 5B Section 7 which requires all Comprehensive Plan Amendments to be processed as detailed below. The following are not exhaustive of the aforementioned standards and contain only those standards found to be relevant to this request. 11-5B-7 11-513-7. C.Process. 1. Comprehensive plan amendment initiated by the city. The Planning and Zoning Commission may propose to amend the comprehensive plan following notice and public hearing procedures in article A, "general provisions", of this chapter and the hearing procedures in Idaho Code § 67-6509. Review: A request to amend the text of the Meridan Comprehensive Plan has been submitted and is subject to the notice and public hearing procedures outlined in Article A"general provisions"of the required chapter and the hearing procedures of Idaho Code § 67-6509.Note: A Neighborhood meeting is not required and has not been held on this request, due to the request being City wide. 4.Amendments to the text component of the Plan may be submitted at any time. Amendments to the text of the comprehensive plan may be recommended by the Commission consistent with section 11-5A-6 of this chapter. Review: The subject amendment is an amendment to the text of the Comprehensive Plan and is subject to section 11-5A-6 of the Meridian UDC. 5.The commission,prior to recommending the adoption, amendment, or repeal of the comprehensive plan to the Council, shall conduct at least one(1)public hearing in accordance with article A, "General Provisions", of this chapter and in accordance with the procedures in Idaho Code § 67-6509. Review: As part of their review and prior to recommending an amendment to the Plan, a public hearing has been noticed for the October 16,2025, Planning&Zoning Commission meeting. 11-511-7.D. Required Findings. Review: The required findings may be found in Section V"Findings" of this staff report. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS Comments from outside agencies and City of Meridian Departments associated with this application and received by October 06, 2025, are summarized below. Interagency comments can be found on Laserfiche at the link below and within Exhibit C: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=413618&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 7 of 11 A. Meridian Public Works 1. Wastewater Modeling Review:No changes in public sewer infrastructure shown in record. Any changes must be approved by public works (https:Heplanreview.meridiancity.org/ProjectDoxWebUI/proj ect/Index?ProjectID=28504 &tab=correctionsTab) 2. Water Modeling Review: Distance to Mainline—Water available at site; Impacts of Concerns—No changes to public water infrastructure shown in record. Any changes must be approved by public works. This includes hydrants or the abandonment of water mains. (https://eplanreview.meridiancity.org/ProjectDoxWebUl/proj ect/Index?ProjectID=28504 &tab=correctionsTab) V. FINDINGS A. Comprehensive Plan(UDC 11-513-71)) Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan,the Council shall make the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. Commission Finding: The Commission finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the elements of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and which contribute to all eighteen (18) elements required by Idaho State Statute. The Commission finds the amendment maintains this consistency as no changes are substantive to policy. Evidence includes the application, supporting materials submitted, and the staff report with all exhibits for case file H-2025- 0045. Evidence also includes the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and all associated policies, studies and plans as proposed to be updated. 2. The proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and development of the city. Commission Finding: The proposed amendment as described herein provides an improved guide to the future growth and development of the City by facilitating the provision of services to the Community and ensuring that supporting plans and studies remain up to date and relevant. The Commission finds that the proposed amendment provides an improved and current guide to future growth and development with the City. Evidence includes the application, supporting materials submitted, and the staff report with all exhibits for case file H-2025-0045. Evidence also includes the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and all associated policies, studies and plans as proposed to be updated. 3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the goals,objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Commission Finding: The Commission finds the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Maintenance of the Plan is directed by policy within the Plan and the State of Idaho. Evidence includes the application, supporting materials submitted, and the staff report with all exhibits for case file H-2025-0045. Evidence also includes the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and all associated policies, studies and plan as proposed to be updated. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with this Unified Development Code. Commission Finding: The Commission finds the proposed amendment is consistent with the Unified Development Code, as no development proposed and no policies in the Comprehensive Plan are being modified. Evidence includes the application, supporting materials submitted, and the staff report with all exhibits for case file H-2025-0045. Evidence also includes the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and all associated policies, studies and plans. City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 8 of 11 5. The amendment will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. Commission Finding: The Commission finds the proposed amendment is compatible with existing land uses, as no development proposed and no policies in the Comprehensive Plan are being modified. The proposed amendment as described herein provides an improved guide to the future growth and development of the City by facilitating the provision of services to the Community and ensuring that supporting plans and studies remain up to date and relevant. Evidence includes the application, supporting materials submitted, and the staff report with all exhibits for case file H-2025-0045. Evidence also includes the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and all associated policies, studies and plans as proposed to be updated. 6. The proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. Commission Finding: The Commission finds that the proposed Plan will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. This amendment maintains the relationship between service planning and reflects coordination with partner agencies in service planning. This amendment will further the implantation of planning efforts related to growth and ensuring that service capabilities are not overburdened. Evidence includes the application, supporting materials submitted and the staff report with all exhibits for case file H-2025-0045. Evidence also includes the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and all associated policies, studies and plans as proposed to be updated. 7. The proposed map amendment(as applicable)provides a logical juxtaposition of uses that allows sufficient area to mitigate any anticipated impact associated with the development of the area. Commission Finding:A map amendment is not proposed as part of this Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment. 8. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. Commission Finding: The Commission finds that the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City as it facilitates the provision of services to the Community and ensuring that supporting plans and studies remain up to date and relevant to the community. Evidence includes the application, supporting materials submitted, and the staff report with all exhibits for case file H-2025-0045. Evidence also includes the 2019 Comprehensive Plan and all associated policies, studies and plans as proposed to be updated. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommended approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on October 16,2025. At the public hearing the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject application,H- 2025-0045. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: i. In favor:No testimony provided. ii. In opposition:No testimony provided. iii. Commenting:No testimony provided iv. Written testimony:No testimony provided. v. Staff presenting application: Carl Anderson presented the application. City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 9 of 11 vi. Other Staff commenting on application: Caleb Hood 2. Key issues(s) of public testimony: i. None. 3. Key issues(s) of discussion by Commission: i. Discussion was had related to the distinction between the City's Capital Financial Plan (CFP)and Capital Improvement Plans(CIP). The CFP has more than the CIP for impact fees,the CIP is incorporated as part of the CFP. ii. Questions related to the terminology between Capital Improvement Program vs Plan. Staff clarified that staff recommend changing from program to plan to be consistent with both State and City practice, and that Program was likely a carry over from past practice. iii. Questions related to the frequency of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan were brought forward. Staff clarified that timing is generally as needed. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: The Commission included staff s recommendation to include a change to"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"to add/modify language, specifically related to the current definition of Capital Improvement Program. While not as originally drafted and noticed for the Planning&Zoning Commission, it was recommended that the Commission further modify the definition below to amend all references from the existing language of "Program"to"Plan". This amendment would further improve consistency and reduce potential confusion. The Commission's motion included staff s recommended to further modify the language from"program"to"Plan". The amended language is included on page 5 of this report and also in Attachment B2. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: i. None. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 10 of 11 VII. EXHIBITS: A. Application Packet& Supporting Materials A.1 Application A.2 Memorandum: September 05, 2025 A.3 Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee —Minutes August 7,2025 A.4 Ada County Emergency Medical Service District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements (Agreement No. 30708) A.5 EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study—May 24,2024 A.6 Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvement Plans for County System Improvements(Agreement No. 30465) A.7 Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study—May 24,2024 A.8 Meridian Development Impact Fees Study(Ordinance 22-2004) A.9 "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference"—Draft Amendment A.10"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"—Draft Amendment B. Supplemental Documents B.1 Intergovernmental&Joint Powers agreement—Memo to Council—Dated: June 17, 2025 13.2"Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"—Draft Amendment—As amended by Commission City of Meridian I Planning Department—Long Range Division Page 11 of 11 Exhibit A Application Packet & Supporting Materials Exhibit A.1 Hearing Date: October 16, 2025 Project Name: 2025 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment Assigned Planner: Carl Anderson Request: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment(CPAT)for the following: 1)Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study(May 24, 2024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study(May 24, 2024); 2)Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study(September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein; 3)Amend the"List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference" including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced; and 4)Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"to add/modify language. Location: Citywide Application Information E IDIANI___"­ City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. Suite 102 Meridian, ID 83642 Building Services - PH: 887-2211 / FAX: 887-1297 Planning - PH: 884-5533 / FAX: 888-6854 Project Name Application Number Application Status 2025 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment - H-2025-0045 In Progress Project Address No address found. Applicant Name Address Phone Fax Email CARL 33 E. BROADWAY AVE. canderson@meridiancity.or ANDERSON, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 g CITY OF MERIDIAN Contacts Name Address Phone Fax Email Carl Anderson 33 E. Broadway Ave. canderson@meridiancity.or Meridian, ID 83642 g Carl Anderson 33 E. Broadway Ave. canderson@meridiancity.or Meridian, ID 83642 g Carl Anderson 33 E. Broadway Ave. canderson@meridiancity.or Meridian, ID 83642 g Application Information Question Answer Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment- CPAT CHECKED Is this City Initiated? Yes Address Verification Permit Number LDAV-2025-0740 Other Type of Use Proposed N/A General Location City Wide Current Land Use N/A Total Acreage N/A Prior Approvals (File Numbers) N/A Traffic Study Required per ACHD No What was the date of your pre-application meeting? 09/04/2025 Pre-Application Permit Number(ex: PREAPP-2021-0001) PREAPP-2025-0109 Verified submittal standards and checklist items CHECKED Verify that all drawings/documents will be uploaded in Project Dox as CHECKED Individual PDF's I have read and accept the above terms CHECKED Your signature Carl Anderson Page 1 of 2 H-2025-0045 09/05/2025 Hearing Information No hearings found. Page 2 of 2 H-2025-0045 09/05/2025 Exhibit A.2 MEMORANDUM E IDIAN;--- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i1 D A H G September 5, 2025 TO: Mayor & Council Planning & Zoning Commission CC: Bruce Freckleton, Community development Director Caleb Hood, Deputy Director Brian McClure, Long Range Planning Supervisor FROM: Carl Anderson, Long Range Associate Planner RE: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment The City of Meridian Planning Division is applying for a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (CPAT). The proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendment is intended to accomplish the following: 1) Adopt by reference the Ada County Emergency Medical Service Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May24,024) and Ada County Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study (May 24, 2024); 2) Adopt by reference the City of Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (September 16, 2022) and Amended Capital Improvements Plan as incorporated therein; 3) Amend the "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference" including minor cleanup and ensure the most current adopted plans and studies are referenced; and 4) Amend "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms" to add/modify language. Supporting documentation and materials are included as part of this request and may be further detailed in the subsequent staff report. Sincerely, Carl Anderson I Long Range Associate Planner City of Meridian I Community Development Department Phone: 208.489.0328 canderson@meridiancity.org Community Development. 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone zo8-884-5533 ■ Fax 208-888-6854 . www.meridiancity.org Please see the following supporting documents included with this request: A. Ada County/ Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee— Minutes August 7, 2025 B. Ada County Emergency Medical Service District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements (Agreement No. 30708) C. EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study— May 24, 2024 D. Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvement Plans for County System Improvements(Agreement No. 30465) E. Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study— May 24, 2024 F. Meridian Development Impact Fees Study (Ordinance 22-2004) G. "List of Adopted Plans and Studies by Reference"— Draft Amendment H. "Appendix A. Glossary of Terms"— Draft Amendment Page 2 Exhibit A.3 ADA COUNTY/ADA COUNTY AMBULANCE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE 200 W.Front Street Shelly Buchanan-Chair LeeJoe Lay Boise,Idaho 83702 David Yorgason-Vice Chair Mike Wardle P.(208)287-7900 Nicolette Kimmel Michael McCurry F.(208)287-7909 Shelly Buchanan The purpose of the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee is to assist the elected leadership of these jurisdictions in the adoption, implementation and updates to the Ada County Development Impact Fee Studies and Capital Improvement Plans. The Committee also make recommendations on how the funds collected from development impact fees should be used and when assumptions or studies need to be updated. MINUTES for August 7, 2025, 4:00 P.M. VIRTUAL OR IN PERSON MEETING The meeting will be conducted at 200 W Front Street,Development Services Office and/or via WebEx Video Conference. If you would like to participate by phone or video,please contact Leon Letson. He can be reached at lletsonPadacounty.id.org or(208)287-7950. I. CALL TO ORDER- II. ROLL CALL&INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS Members Guests Staff X Chris Findlay X Mike Wardle X Leon Letson,Staff X Nicolette Kimmel LeeJoe Lay X David Yorgason X Michael McCurry X Shelly Buchanan III. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES IV. NEW BUSINESS: A. Review of Ada County CIPs for adoption into the Meridian Comprehensive Plan Staff presented the Ada County CIPs for the Jail, Coroner, and EMS. The Committee noted that the methodology used appeared sound and the proposed fee amounts seemed appropriate. There was additional discussion surrounding the CIP for the Coroner, with Committee member Yorgason noting concern he had heard from some of the partner cities on whether or not Idaho State Code allowed for this public service as being eligible for the collection of impact fees.Staff shared discussions they had also had around this issue and some efforts Ada County would be making during the next legislative session to bring clarity to this issue. The Committee unanimously supported collecting this impact fee, but stated they would not want to see delays on the collection of the other impact fees if the Coroner impact fee continued to be debated. Mike Wardle moved to approve. David Yorgason seconded.Approved 6-0. V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: VII. ADJOURNMENT- A. Next Scheduled Meeting: TBD,4:00 p.m. Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB Exhibit A.4 AGREEMENT NO. 30708 ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A& 67-23281 Parties to Agreement: Ada County Emergency Medical District Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Services District Attn:Director 370 N. Benjamin Ln. Boise, Idaho 83704 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 22, 2025 ("Effective Date") by and between the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District ("District") and the City of Meridian("City") as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plan ("CIP") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE I Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County Medical Services District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements. 1.4 Board: Means and refers to the Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District. 1.5 Capital Improvements Plan and/or CIP: Means and refers to the May 24, 2024 EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study,which was prepared for the District and adopted by the Ada County Board of Commissioners. 1.6 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.7 City Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.8 District: Means and refers to the Ada County Medical Services District, Party to this Agreement. 1.9 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the District and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.10 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.11 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIP.The CIP is intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development,protect the public health,safety,and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers, privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the District and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 2.4. The District is responsible for providing emergency medical services on a countywide basis. 2.5. The District is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the District's ability to provide emergency medical services is affected by said development. 2.6 The District has provided the City with the CIP, which was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIP in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3) and 67-8208(l). 2.8 The District has requested that the City adopt the CIP in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however, that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIP. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIP and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The District, in cooperation with Ada County, shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The District shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIP with the City on or before June 30, 2025, to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIP prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB SECTION 4 SERVICE AREA 4.1 Idaho Code § 67-8203(26) provides that the Parties can identify a geographic area by an intergovernmental agreement in which specific public facilities provide services to development within that geographic area on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles or both. 4.2 The CIP and this Agreement define the Service Area as the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. SECTION 5 COSTS SPECIFIC TO DISTRICT 5.1 The District shall pay the following costs: 5.1.1 All costs associated with the Advisory Committee; and 5.1.2 All District costs associated with drafting this Agreement and any amendment or termination of the same; and 5.1.3 All costs associated with the District's performance of this Agreement; and 5.1.4 All legal costs and fees associated with any action brought by a third party concerning the validity of the CIP or this Agreement. SECTION 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 After the Advisory Committee files its written comments concerning the CIP with the City in accordance with the Act and Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement, the City shall consider the adoption of the CIP in accordance with the Act. 6.2 If the City adopts the CIP, the City agrees to consider the possibility of adopting a City ordinance concerning the countywide development impact fees delineated in the CIP, but only after (a) the Parties negotiate and agree on a new intergovernmental agreement for that purpose and(b) all the incorporated cities in Ada County have adopted(1)the CIP and (2) the ordinances necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. 6.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that: 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt the CIP; and ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 4 Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 6.3.2 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt an ordinance implementing countywide development impact fees. SECTION 7 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 To the extent permitted by law, District shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for all claims, losses, actions, damages, judgements, costs, and expenses arising out of or in connection with any acts or omissions of the District related to the CIP or this Agreement. In the event of such claim,District shall defend such allegations, and District shall bear all costs,fees,and expenses of such defense, including,but not limited to, all attorney fees and expenses,court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses. SECTION 8 TERM/TERMINATION/AMENDMENT 8.1 Term. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2029, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 8.2 of this Agreement. 8.2 Party Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party upon ninety (90) day notice in writing to the other Party. 8.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the Parties. SECTION 9 NOTICE AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS 9.1 Notices. All notices,requests or demands to a Party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given or served upon the other Party by US Mail or email addressed as set forth below. 9.2 Contact Information. The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the District is as follows: Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Attn: Director 370 N. Benjamin Ln. Boise, Idaho 83704 With Copy to: Ada County Prosecutor's Office Attn: Chief Civil Deputy 200 W. Front Street, Room 3191 Boise, Idaho 83702 adacountyprosecutor@adacounty.id.gov ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 5 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 9.3 The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the City is as follows: City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 Third Party Beneficiaries. Each Party to this Agreement intends that this Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person or legal entity other than the Parties hereto. 10.2 Electronic and Non-Electronic Signatures: The District and City may execute this Agreement using handwritten signatures or electronic signatures, in accordance with Idaho's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The Parties acknowledge and agree that both signature methods are equally valid and binding for the purposes of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. Should any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, parties, or circumstances, for any reason be declared illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal or invalid provision had not been contained herein. 10.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted by the laws of the State of Idaho. Venue shall be Ada County, Idaho. 10.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements,promises,or inducements made by either Party, or agents of either Party, whether oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both Parties. 10.6 Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence for all events and obligations to be performed under this Agreement. 10.7 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party brings any action or proceedings to enforce, protect or establish any right or remedy under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to any other relief awarded. 10.8 Assignment. No Party may assign this Agreement or any interest therein. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 6 Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District DocuSigned by: By: A180� 4/22/2025 1 3:25 PM MDT Rod Beck, Commissioner D ocuSigned by, By: 4/23/2025 1 12:06 PM MDT Ryan Davidson, Commissioner DocuSigned by: �� -By: 4/22/2025 1 3:58 PM MDT Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: DocuSigned by: 4/23/2025 1 4:16 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of Meridian By: Mayor Ro . Simison 6-24-2025 ATTEST: SEAL Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 7 Exhibit A.5 A O OF14 EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Submitted to: Ada County, Idaho May 24, 2024 Prepared by: TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING 999 W Main St Suite 100 Boise, ID 83702 800.424.4318 www.tischlerbise.com Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study [Page intentional blank] i TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Study Ada County, Idaho ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................1 Idaho Development Impact Fee Enabling Legislation...............................................................................2 Summary of Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fees..................................................3 Methodologiesand Credits...................................................................................................................3 FeeMethodologies...............................................................................................................................4 CapitalImprovement Plan....................................................................................................................5 CapitalImprovement Plan ............................................................................................................................7 CapitalImprovement Plan ....................................................................................................................9 Funding Sources for Capital Improvements .......................................................................................10 Emergency Medical Services Development Impact Fee Analysis...............................................................11 Cost Allocation for EMS Infrastructure...................................................................................................12 EMS Level of Service and Cost Analysis ..................................................................................................13 EMSFacilities ......................................................................................................................................13 EMSLand ............................................................................................................................................14 EMSVehicles.......................................................................................................................................15 EMSEquipment...................................................................................................................................15 Share of the Development Impact Fee Study.....................................................................................16 EMS Capital Improvements Needed to Serve Growth............................................................................17 EMSFacilities ......................................................................................................................................17 EMSLand ............................................................................................................................................18 EMSVehicles.......................................................................................................................................19 EMSEquipment...................................................................................................................................20 EMS Development Impact Fee Credit Analysis.......................................................................................20 EMS Input Variables and Development Impact Fees..............................................................................21 Cash Flow Projections for EMS Maximum Supportable Impact Fee.......................................................22 Proportionate Share Analysis......................................................................................................................23 Implementation and Administration ..........................................................................................................24 Appendix A. Land Use Definitions...............................................................................................................26 ResidentialDevelopment........................................................................................................................26 Nonresidential Development Categories................................................................................................27 Appendix B. Demographic Assumptions.....................................................................................................28 Population and Housing Characteristics.................................................................................................28 Base Year Population and Housing Units................................................................................................29 Population and Housing Unit Projections...............................................................................................32 Current Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area.............................................................................34 Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections .......................................................................35 VehicleTrip Generation ..........................................................................................................................39 ii TischlerBlse FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Residential Vehicle Trips by Housing Type .........................................................................................39 Residential Vehicle Trips Adjustment Factors.........................................................................................40 NonresidentialVehicle Trips...................................................................................................................41 VehicleTrip Projections ..........................................................................................................................42 Appendix C. Emergency Medical Services Call Volume Density Heat Map................................................45 TischlerBlse FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ada County, Idaho, retained TischlerBise, Inc. to calculate the impact fees to be imposed on new development to meet the new demands generated for public facilities in the County. It is the intent of Ada County to evaluate and establish impact fees for EMS facilities. This report presents the methodologies and calculations used to generate current levels of service and maximum supportable impact fees. It is intended to serve as supporting documentation for the evaluation and establishment of impact fees in Ada County. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the County's compliance with Idaho Statutes as authorized by the Idaho Legislature. Consistent with the statutory authorization for development impact fees (Idaho Code 67-8202(1-4)), it is the intent of Ada County to: 1. Collect impact fees to ensure that adequate public facilities are available to serve new growth and development; 2. Promote orderly growth and development by establishing uniform standards by which local governments may require that those who benefit from new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new public facilities needed to serve new growth and development; 3. Establish minimum standards for the adoption of development impact fee ordinances by government entities; 4. Ensure that those who benefit from new growth and development are required to pay no more than their proportionate share of the cost of public facilities needed to serve new growth and development and to prevent duplicate and ad hoc development requirements; Impact fees are one-time payments used to construct system improvements needed to accommodate new development. An impact fee represents new growth's fair share of capital facility needs. By law, impact fees can only be used for capital improvements, not operating or maintenance costs. Impact fees are subject to legal standards, which require fulfillment of three key elements: need, benefit and proportionality. • First, to justify a fee for public facilities, it must be demonstrated that new development will create a need for capital improvements. • Second, new development must derive a benefit from the payment of the fees (i.e., in the form of public facilities constructed within a reasonable timeframe). • Third, the fee paid by a particular type of development should not exceed its proportional share of the capital cost for system improvements. 1 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study TischlerBise evaluated possible methodologies and documented appropriate demand indicators by type of development for the levels of service and fees. Local demographic data and improvement costs were used to identify specific capital costs attributable to growth. This report includes summary tables indicating the specific factors, referred to as level of service standards, used to derive the impact fees. The geographic area for the EMS impact fees is countywide.These facilities provide a countywide benefit and are services not provided by the cities within Ada County. IDAHO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ENABLING LEGISLATION The Enabling Legislation governs how development fees are calculated for municipalities in Idaho. All requirements of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act(hereafter referred to as the Idaho Act) have been met in the supporting documentation prepared by TischlerBise. There are four requirements of the Idaho Act that are not common in the development impact fee enabling legislation of other states. This overview offers further clarification of these unique requirements. First, as specified in 67-8204(2) of the Idaho Act, "development impact fees shall be calculated on the basis of levels of service for public facilities . . . applicable to existing development as well as new growth and development." Second, Idaho requires a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) [see 67-8208]. The CIP requirements are summarized in this report,with detailed documentation provided in the discussion on infrastructure. Third,the Idaho Act also requires documentation of any existing deficiencies in the types of infrastructure to be funded by development impact fees[see 67-8208(1)(a)]. The intent of this requirement is to prevent charging new development to cure existing deficiencies. In the context of development impact fees for Ada County, the term "deficiencies" means a shortage or inadequacy of current system improvements when measured against the levels of service to be applied to new development. It does not mean a shortage or inadequacy when measured against some "hoped for" level of service. TischlerBise used the current infrastructure cost per service unit (i.e., existing standards), or future levels of service where appropriate, multiplied by the projected increase in service units over an appropriate planning timeframe,to yield the cost of growth-related system improvements.The relationship between these three variables can be reduced to a mathematical formula, expressed as A x B = C. In section 67- 8204(16), the Idaho Act simply reorganizes this formula, stating the cost per service unit (i.e., development impact fee) may not exceed the cost of growth-related system improvements divided by the number of projected service units attributable to new development (i.e., A = C _ B). By using existing infrastructure standards to determine the need for growth-related capital improvements, Ada County ensures the same level-of-service standards are applicable to existing and new development. Using existing infrastructure standards also means there are no existing deficiencies in the current system that must be corrected from non-development impact fee funding. 2 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Fourth, Idaho requires a proportionate share determination [see 67-8207]. Basically, local government must consider various types of applicable credits and/or other revenues that may reduce the capital costs attributable to new development.The development impact fee methodologies and the cash flow analysis have addressed the need for credits to avoid potential double payment for growth-related infrastructure. SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES METHODOLOGIES AND CREDITS Development impact fees can be calculated by any one of several legitimate methods. The choice of a particular method depends primarily on the service characteristics and planning requirements for each facility type. Each method has advantages and disadvantages in a particular situation,and to some extent can be interchangeable, because each allocates facility costs in proportion to the needs created by development. Reduced to its simplest terms, the process of calculating development impact fees involves two main steps: (1) determining the cost of development-related capital improvements and (2) allocating those costs equitably to various types of development. In practice, though, the calculation of impact fees can become quite complicated because of the many variables involved in defining the relationship between development and the need for facilities. The following paragraphs discuss three basic methods for calculating development impact fees, and how each method can be applied. Cost Recovery or Buy-In Fee Calculation. The rationale for the cost recovery approach is that new development is paying for its share of the useful life and remaining capacity of facilities already built or land already purchased from which new growth will benefit. This methodology is often used for systems that were oversized such as sewer and water facilities. Incremental Expansion Fee Calculation.The incremental expansion method documents the current level of service (LOS)for each type of public facility in both quantitative and qualitative measures, based on an existing service standard (such as park land acres per 1,000 residents). This approach ensures that there are no existing infrastructure deficiencies or surplus capacity in infrastructure. New development is only paying its proportionate share for growth-related infrastructure. An incremental expansion cost method is best suited for public facilities that will be expanded in regular increments, with LOS standards based on current conditions in the community. Plan-Based Fee Calculation. The plan-based method allocates costs for a specified set of improvements to a specified amount of development. Facility plans identify needed improvements, and land use plans identify development. In this method, the total cost of relevant facilities is divided by total demand to calculate a cost per unit of demand. Then, the cost per unit of demand is multiplied by the amount of demand per unit of development (e.g., housing units or square feet of building area) in each category to arrive at a cost per specific unit of development(e.g., single family detached unit). 3 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Credits. Regardless of the methodology, a consideration of "credits" is integral to the development of a legally valid impact fee methodology. There are two types of "credits," each with specific and distinct characteristics, but both of which should be addressed in the calculation of development impact fees.The first is a credit due to possible double payment situations.This could occur when contributions are made by the property owner toward the capital costs of the public facility covered by the impact fee. This type of credit is integrated into the impact fee calculation.The second is a credit toward the payment of a fee for dedication of public sites or improvements provided by the developer and for which the facility fee is imposed. This type of credit is addressed in the administration and implementation of a facility fee program. FEE METHODOLOGIES Of the fee methodologies discussed above, the incremental expansion method and the cost recovery method are used to calculate EMS impact fees for Ada County. Where capacity is sufficient to serve current demand the incremental expansion method documents the current Level of Service(LOS)for each type of public facility. While the cost of the impact fee study is captured through the cost recovery method. Additionally, Ada County anticipates working with the cities to collect the EMS impact fee countywide. The following table summarizes the method(s) used to derive the impact fee for each type of public facility in Ada County. Figure 1. Summary of Impact Fee Methodologies Fee Category Service Area Cost Incremental Plan-Based Cost Recovery Expansion Allocation EMS Stations, Impact Fee Person&Vehicle EMS Countywide EMS Land, EMS Vehicles,7 Study and EMS Equipment Trips 4 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The EMS development impact fee is based on the existing level of service provided for EMS facilities.The development impact fee is calculated for residential and nonresidential development. Figure 2 shows that to serve projected growth at current levels of service, EMS will need to provide 12,215 square feet of new facility space, 1.59 acres of land, 6.0 new vehicle units, and 41.9 new equipment units over the next ten years. Figure 2. EMS Summary of Demand for Projected Growth Station Space 12,215 square feet $7,096,915 Station Land 1.59 acres $516,750 Apparatus 6.0 vehicles $2,123,508 Equipment 41.9 units $796,100 Total $10,533,273 Listed in Figure 3 are the capital improvement plans for facility expansion for the next ten years. The planned expansions are consistent and exceed growth-related needs to continue providing the current level of service. Figure 3. EMS Capital Improvement Plan 10-Year Growth-Related Capital Plan Unit Cost per Unit I Total Cost New Facility Space Station: Floating Feather/Horseshoe Bend 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: Federal Way/Amity 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: Fairview and Cloverdale 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: Lake Hazel/Five Mile 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: 10 Mile/Franklin 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Subtotal 16,230 square feet $9,429,630 New Facility Land 5 New Stations(1-1.5 acres per station) 1 7.5 acres 1 $325,0001 $2,437,500 Subtotal 7.5 acres $2,437,500 New Apparatus Ambulance w/required capital equipment 1 10 vehicles 1 $353,9181 $3,539,177 Subtotal 10 vehicles $3,539,177 New Equipment Portable radios 20 units $7,644 $152,886 Mobile/station radios 20 units $8,298 $165,952 Subtotal 40 units $318,838 Station Cost $11,867,130 Apparatus Cost $3,539,177 Equipment Cost $318,838 Grand Total $15,725,145 5 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Maximum Supportable Development Impact Fees by Type of Land Use Figure 4 provides a schedule of the maximum supportable development impact fees by type of land use for Ada County.The fees represent the highest supportable amount for each type of applicable land use and represents new growth's fair share of the cost for capital facilities. The County may adopt fees that are less than the amounts shown. However,a reduction in impact fee revenue will necessitate an increase in other revenues, a decrease in planned capital expenditures, and/or a decrease in levels of service. The fees for residential development are to be assessed per housing unit based on type. For nonresidential development, the fees are assessed per square foot of floor area (for illustrative purposes the nonresidential fee is listed per 1,000 square feet of development). Nonresidential development categories are consistent with the terminology and definitions contained in the reference book,Trip Generation 111n Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These definitions are provided in the Appendix A. Land Use Definitions. Importantly, the Ada County Paramedics provide a countywide service and benefit. Thus, the impact fee study has calculated the maximum supportable fee based on a countywide level of service. In this case, Figure 4 lists the maximum amounts for all development within Ada County. Figure 4. Summary of Maximum Supportable Development Impact Fees—Countywide DevelopmentEMS Maximum Supportable Residential(per housing unit) Single Family Multifamily Nonresidential (per 1,000 square feet) Retail Office Industrial Institutional 6 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT The following section provides a summary of the Capital Improvement Plan depicting growth-related capital demands and costs on which the fees are based. First, Figure 5 and Figure 6 lists the projected growth over the next ten years in Ada County.Overall,there is an estimated 23 percent increase in residential development (125,397 new residents and 50,296 new housing units) and an 18 percent increase in nonresidential development (43,283 new jobs and 16.9 million square feet of development). Further details on the development projections are provided in Appendix B. Demographic Assumptions. 7 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure S.Ten-Year Projected Residential Growth Base Year Total Population 1 544,5901 568,015 591,946 602,628 613,310 623,991 634,673 645,355 653,566 661,776 669,987 125,397 Percent Increase 4.3% 4.2% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 23.0% Housing Units Single Family 182,342 190,171 198,180 201,750 205,321 208,891 212,462 216,033 218,774 221,515 224,256 41,914 Multifamily 37,833 39,417 41,005 41,716 42,426 43,137 43,847 44,558 45,110 45,662 46,215 8,382 Total Housing Units 220,175 229,588 239,185 243,466 247,747 252,028 256,309 260,591 263,884 267,177 270,471 50,296 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; TischlerBise analysis Figure 6.Ten-Year Projected Nonresidential Growth Base Year Total Jobs[l] Retail 43,787 44,612 45,437 46,262 47,086 47,910 48,734 49,557 50,367 51,177 51,986 8,199 Office 130,780 133,132 135,483 137,835 140,186 142,538 144,889 147,241 149,556 151,872 154,187 23,407 Industrial 35,745 36,388 37,030 37,673 38,315 38,958 39,600 40,242 40,875 41,507 42,139 6,394 Institutional 29,356 29,884 30,413 30,943 31,472 32,003 32,533 33,064 33,588 34,113 34,639 5,283 Total 1 239,6681 244,016 248,364 252,712 257,060 261,408 265,756 270,104 274,386 278,669 282,951 43,283 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 41,938 42,327 42,715 43,104 43,492 43,880 44,268 44,656 45,037 45,419 45,800 3,862 Office 21,670 22,392 23,114 23,836 24,558 25,280 26,002 26,724 27,434 28,145 28,856 7,186 Industrial 41,668 42,078 42,487 42,896 43,305 43,715 44,124 44,533 44,936 45,339 45,741 4,073 Institutional 25,911 26,096 26,281 26,467 26,652 26,838 27,023 27,209 27,392 27,576 27,760 1,849 Total 1 131,1881 132,893 134,598 136,302 138,007 139,712 141,417 143,121 144,800 146,479 148,1571 16,970 [11 COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [21 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 8 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act requires Capital Improvement Plans to be updated regularly, at least once every five years (Idaho Code 67-8208(2)). This report projects revenue and fees based on 10- year forecast in an effort to provide the public and elected officials with illustrative guidance of probable growth demands based on current trends however, per Idaho Code, it is expected that an update to all Capital Improvement Plans included in this study will occur within five years. FUNDING SOURCES FOR CURRENT DEFICIENCIES The majority of the CIP relates to the construction of five new stations, followed by new apparatus, acquiring land for future stations, and new equipment. In addition, it is estimated that$1,000,000 will be required for maintenance and repair of existing facilities over the next five years. Because replacement and addressing existing deficiencies are not eligible to be funded with impact fees, these costs will need to be funded by other sources, such as property taxes, in accordance with Idaho Code 67-8207(iv)(2)(h). The Board of Ada County Commissioners retain discretion and authority to fund deficiencies through the county's annual CIP budget process, accumulate savings annually in a construction fund, budget annually for one-time projects using unspent fund balance, or through the deferred maintenance budget annually appropriated to the Operations Department for these sorts of expenses. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The EMS development impact fee is based on the existing level of service provided for EMS facilities.The development impact fee is calculated for residential and nonresidential development. Based on the 10- year growth projections,the following infrastructure is projected over the next ten years: • 12,215 square feet of new facility • 1.59 new acres of land for facilities • 6.0 new vehicle units • 41.9 new equipment units • $10,533,000 total cost to Ada County The projected demand is consistent with the Ada County EMS expansion plans.Currently,the department is exploring options for new stations and ambulances and will need more radios for staff hired to occupy the new stations over the next ten years. These projections are consistent with the EMS departments Capital Improvement Plan shown in Figure 7. 9 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 7. EMS Capital Improvement Plan 10-Year Growth-Related Capital Plan Unit Cost per Unit I Total Cost New Facility Space Station: Floating Feather/Horseshoe Bend 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: Federal Way/Amity 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: Fairview and Cloverdale 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: Lake Hazel/Five Mile 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Station: 10 Mile/Franklin 3,246 square feet $581 $1,885,926 Subtotal 16,230 square feet $9,429,630 New Facility Land 5 New Stations(1-1.5 acres per station) 1 7.5 acres $325,0001 $2,437,500 Subtotal 7.5 acres $2,437,500 New Apparatus Ambulance w/required capital equipment 1 10 vehicles $353,9181 $3,539,177 Subtotal 10 vehicles $3,539,177 New Equipment Portable radios 20 units $7,644 $152,886 Mobile/station radios 20 units $8,298 $165,952 Subtotal 40 units $318,838 Station Cost $11,867,130 Apparatus Cost $3,539,177 Equipment Cost $318,838 Grand Total $15,725,145 FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS In determining the proportionate share of capital costs attributable to new development, the Idaho Development Fee Act states that local governments must consider historical, available, and alternative sources of funding for system improvements (Idaho Code 67-8207(2)). Currently,there are no dedicated revenues being collected by the County to fund growth-related projects for the infrastructure included in this study. Furthermore,the maximum supportable impact fees are constructed to offset the growth-related capital costs to the County for EMS facilities. Evidence is given in the specific chapters of this report that the projected capital costs from new development will be offset by the development impact fees collection as long as the program is collected in the entire service area. Thus, no credits are needed in the impact fee calculation to offset double collection for growth-related capital costs. 10 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS The EMS Development Impact Fee is based on the cost per service unit method specified in Idaho Code 67-8204(16), also referred to as the incremental expansion method elsewhere in this report. The EMS components included in the impact fee analysis are: • EMS facilities • EMS land • EMS vehicles • EMS equipment • Share of the development impact fee study The residential portion of the fee is derived from the product of persons per housing unit by housing type multiplied by the net capital cost per person. To calculate nonresidential development impact fees, nonresidential vehicle trips are used as the demand indicator. Trip generation rates are highest for commercial developments, such as shopping centers, and lowest for industrial development. Office and institutional land uses trip rates fall between the other two categories. This ranking of trip rates is consistent with the relative demand for EMS facilities from nonresidential development and thus are the best demand indicators. Other possible nonresidential demand indicators, such as employment or floor area, do not accurately reflect the demand for service. If employees per thousand square feet were used as the demand indicator, EMS Development Impact Fees would be too high for office and institutional development. If floor area were used as the demand indicator, the development impact fees would be too high for industrial development. (See the Appendix for further discussion on trip rates and calculations.) Specified in Idaho Code 67-8207(2), local governments must consider historical,available, and alternative sources of funding for system improvements. Currently, there are no dedicated revenues being collected by the County to fund growth-related projects for EMS facilities. Furthermore,the maximum supportable impact fees are constructed to offset all growth-related capital costs for EMS facilities. Evidence is given in this chapter that the projected capital costs from new development will be entirely offset by the development impact fees. Thus, no general tax dollars are assumed to be used to fund growth-related capital costs, requiring no further revenue credits. 11 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study COST ALLOCATION FOR EMS INFRASTRUCTURE Both residential and nonresidential developments increase the demand for EMS services and facilities.To calculate the proportional share between residential and nonresidential demand, calls for service data from the Ada County Paramedics is analyzed. Shown at the top of Figure 8, 54 percent of calls are to residential locations, 23 percent to nonresidential locations, and 23 percent are classified as traffic calls. Base year vehicle trips are used to assign traffic calls to residential and nonresidential land uses. This results in 4,534 additional residential calls (1,138,874 residential vehicle trips / 2,087,130 total vehicle trips x 8,310 traffic calls for service) and 3,775 additional nonresidential calls (948,256 nonresidential vehicle trips/2,087,130 total vehicle trips x 8,310 traffic calls for service). After this adjustment 67 percent of calls are attributed to residential development and 33 percent are attributed to nonresidential development.These percentages are used to attribute facilities to respective demand units. Later in Appendix C, Figure 43 shows a call volume heat map to indicate areas of higher demand. Figure 8.Ada County EMS Calls for Service Annual Calls Land Use for Service oo o Residential 19,510 54% Nonresidential 8,310 23% Traffic 8,310 23% Total 36,129 100% Base Year Land Use Vehicle Trips %of Total Residential 1,138:874 55% Nonresidential 948256 45% Total 2,087,130 100% Adj.Calls for Land Use Service Residential 24,044 Nonresidential 12,085 Total 36,129 100% Source:Ada County Paramedics 12 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS LEVEL OF SERVICE AND COST ANALYSIS The following section details the level of service calculations and capital cost per person for each infrastructure category. EMS FACILITIES Listed in Figure 9, there is a total of 63,229 square feet occupied by the Ada County Paramedics. The proportionate share between residential and nonresidential demand of the facilities is found by applying the calls for service data percentages.As a result,42,079 square feet are attributed to residential demand and 21,150 square feet is attributed to nonresidential demand. The current level of service is found by comparing the attributed square footage to the base year population and nonresidential vehicles trips.As a result,there is 77.3 square feet per 1,000 residents and 22.3 square feet per 1,000 vehicles trips. The anticipated construction cost of a new station ($581 per square foot) is combined with the current levels of service to find the capital cost per demand unit. This results in a cost of$44.91 per person and $12.96 per vehicle trip (77.3 square feet per 1,000 persons x$581 per square foot=$44.91 per person). Figure 9. EMS Facility Level of Service&Cost Analysis Square Replacement Facility Feet Cost Administration Building-Benjamin 24,351 $14,147,931 Station#13 -Gekeler 3,246 $1,885,926 Station#15 -Bannock 700 $406,700 Station#17-Ridenbaugh 2,224 $1,292,144 Station#18-Overland 3,246 $1,885,926 Station#22 -Chinden 3,246 $1,885,926 Station#23 -Glenwood 6,294 $3,656,814 Station#25 -Featherly Way 2,432 $1,412,992 Station#28-McMillan 3,246 $1,885,926 Station#33 -Boise Ave 725 $421,225 Station#34-Pine 4,137 $2,403,597 Station#36-Linder 3,246 $1,885,926 Station#37-Meridian Co-Location 2,890 $1,679,090 Station#38-Dawes Place 3,246 $1,885,926 Total 63,229 $36,736,049 Level-of-Service Standards Residential Nonres Proportional Share 67% 33% Share of Square Feet 42,079 21,150 2023 Population/Nonres.VehicleTrips 544,590 948,256 Square Feet per 000Persons/Vehicle Cost Analysis Residential Nonres Squa re Feet per 1,000 Persons/Vehi cl e Tri ps 1 77.31 22.3 Average Cost per Square Foot[1] 1 $581 $581 Capital Cost per Person/Vehicle Trip 1 $44.911 $12.96 [1]Square footage cost estimate from Ada County Paramedics 13 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS LAND Listed in Figure 10, there is a total of 8.09 acres occupied by the Ada County Paramedics. The proportionate share between residential and nonresidential demand of the facilities is found by applying the calls for service data percentages. As a result, 5.4 acres are attributed to residential demand and 2.7 acres are attributed to nonresidential demand. The current level of service is found by comparing the attributed acreage to the base year population and nonresidential vehicles trips.As a result,there is 0.010 acres per 1,000 residents and 0.003 acres per 1,000 vehicles trips. The anticipated cost to purchase more land is combined with the current levels of service to find the capital cost per demand unit. This results in a cost of$3.25 per person and $0.98 per vehicle trip (0.010 acres per 1,000 persons x$325,000 per acre =$3.25 per person, rounded). Figure 10. EMS Land Level of Service&Cost Analysis Facility Acres �CurrentValue Administration Building-Benjamin 1.50 $487,500 Station#13 -Gekeler 0.50 $162,500 Station#15 -Bannock 0.02 $6,500 Station#17-Ridenbaugh 0.14 $45,500 Station#18-Overland 0.16 $52,000 Station#22 -Chinden 0.17 $55,250 Station#23 -Glenwood 1.00 $325,000 Station#25 -Featherly Way 0.06 $19,500 Station#28-McMillan 0.32 $104,000 Station#33 -Boise Ave 0.02 $6,500 Station#34-Pine 1.00 $325,000 Station#36-Linder 1.67 $542,750 Station#37-Meridian Co-Location 0.78 $253,500 Station#38-Dawes Place 0.75 $243,750 Total 8.09 $2,629,250 Level-of-Service Standards Residential Nonres Proportional Share 67% 33% Share of Acres 5.4 2.7 2023 Population/Nonres.VehicleTrips 544,590 948,256 Acres per 1,000 ii Cost Analysis Residential Nonres Acres per 1,000 Persons/Vehicle Trips 1 0.0101 0.003 Average Cost per Acre[1] 1 $325,0001 $325,000 Capital Cost per Person/Vehicle Trip 1 $3.251 $0.98 [1]Anticipated costs from Ada County Paramedics 14 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS VEHICLES Listed in Figure 11, the EMS vehicle fleet consists of 31 vehicles. The proportionate share between residential and nonresidential demand of the facility is found by applying the calls for service data percentages. As a result, 20.6 units are attributed to residential demand and 10.4 units are attributed to nonresidential demand.The current level of service is found by comparing the attributed units to the base year population and nonresidential vehicles trips. As a result,there is 0.038 units per 1,000 residents and 0.011 units per 1,000 vehicles trips. The average cost per unit is combined with the current levels of service to find the capital cost per demand unit. This results in a cost of$13.45 per person and $3.89 per vehicle trip (0.038 units per 1,000 persons x$353,918 per unit=$13.45 per person, rounded). Figure 11. EMS Vehicle Level of Service&Cost Analysis Total Vehicles Units Cost per Unit�Replacement Cost Ambulances 1 31 $353,9181 $10,971,458 Total 31 $10,971,458 Level-of-Service Standards Residential Nonres E onalShare 67% 33% Fleet 20.6 10.4 pulation/Nonres.Vehicle Trips 544,590 948,256 Units per 1,000 Persons/Vehicle Trips I 1 1 Cost Analysis Residential Nonres Units per 1,000 Persons/Vehicle Trips 0.038 0.011 Average Cost per Unit $353,918 $353,918 Capital Cost per Person/Vehicle Trip 1 $13.451 $3.89 Source:Ada County Paramedics EMS EQUIPMENT Per the Idaho Act, capital improvements are limited to those improvements that have a certain lifespan. As specified in 67-8203(3) of the Idaho Act, "'Capital improvements' means improvements with a useful life of ten (10)years or more, by new construction or other action, which increase the service capacity of a public facility." Listed in Figure 12 is EMS equipment that have a useful life often or more years qualifying to be impact fee eligible. The proportionate share between residential and nonresidential demand of the facility is found by applying the calls for service data percentages.As a result, 144 units are attributed to residential demand and 73 units are attributed to nonresidential demand.The current level of service is found by comparing the attributed units to the base year population and nonresidential vehicles trips. As a result, there is 0.265 units per 1,000 residents and 0.077 units per 1,000 vehicles trips. 15 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study The average cost per unit is combined with the current levels of service to find the capital cost per demand unit.This results in a cost of$5.04 per person and $1.46 per vehicle trip (0.265 units per 1,000 persons x $19,000 per unit= $5.04 per person, rounded). Figure 12. EMS Equipment Level of Service&Cost Analysis Total Equipment Units �Cost per Unit�Replacement Cost Portable Radios 93 $7,644 $710,921 Mobile/Station Radios 62 $8,298 $514,451 Cardiac Monitor 31 $28,000 $868,000 Gurney 31 $67,000 $2,077,000 Total 217 $4,170,372 Level-of-Service Standards Residential Nonres Proportional Share 67% 33% Share of Equipment 144 73 2023 Population/Nonres.Vehicle Trips 544,590 948,256 Units per 000 0.077 Cost Analysis Residential Nonres 2023 Population/Nonres.Vehicle Trips 0.265 0.077 Average Cost per Unit $19,000 $19,000 Capital Cost per Person/Vehicle Trip 1 $5.041 $1.46 Source:Ada County Paramedics Note: Equipment w/10-Year useful life SHARE OF THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY Under the Idaho enabling legislation, Ada County is able to recover the cost of the study through the collection of future fees. The total cost of the study has been evenly attributed to the four infrastructure categories, resulting in the EMS category share being $16,370. An impact fee study must be completed every five years, so the attributed cost is compared to the five-year projected increase. As a result, the cost per person is$0.14 and the cost per vehicle trip is$0.10. Figure 13. EMS Share of the Development Impact Fee Study Share of Residential Nonresidential Study Cost Share Share $16,370 67% 33% Residential Five-Year Capital Cost Growth Co! Population Increase per Person $10,894 79,401 Nonresidential Five-Year Capital Cost 91 Growth Cost Vehicle Tr ip Increase per Vehicle Trip $5,476 56,847 $0.10 16 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO SERVE GROWTH Needs due to future growth were calculated using the levels of service and cost factors for the infrastructure components. Growth-related needs are a projection of the amount of infrastructure and estimated costs over the next ten years needed to maintain levels of service. EMS FACILITIES The current levels of service are combined with the population and vehicle trip projections to illustrate the need for new EMS facilities. Shown in Figure 14, over the next ten years, there is a need for 12,215 square feet.The average cost per square foot is multiplied by the need to find the projected capital need from growth ($7,096,915). Figure 14. Projected Demand for EMS Facilities Infrastructure I Level of Service Cost/Unit Residential 1 771 1per 1,000 persons EMS Facilities Square Feet $581 Nonresidential 1 221 1 per 1,000 veh.trips Growth-Related Need for EMS Facilities Year Population Nonres. Residential Nonresidential Total I Vehicle Trips Square Feet Square Fei Square Feet Base 2023 544,590 948,256 42,096 21,146 63,242 Year 1 2024 568,015 959,629 43,907 21,399 65,306 Year 2 2025 591,946 971,000 45,757 21,653 67,410 Year 3 2026 602,628 982,369 46,583 21,906 68,489 Year 4 2027 613,310 993,737 47,408 22,160 69,568 Year 5 2028 623,991 1,005,103 48,234 22,413 70,647 Year 6 2029 634,673 1,016,467 49,060 22,667 71,727 Year 7 2030 645,355 1,027,830 49,885 22,920 72,805 Year 8 2031 653,566 1,039,020 50,520 23,170 73,690 Year 9 2032 661,776 1,050,206 51,155 23,419 74,574 Year 10 2033 669,987 1,061,389 51,789 23,668 75,457 Ten-Year Increase 125,397 113,134 9,693 2,522 12,215 Projected Expenditure $5,631,633 $1,465,282 $7,096,915 Growth-Related Expenditures for EMS Facilities $7,096,915 17 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS LAND The current levels of service are combined with the population and vehicle trip projections to illustrate the need for new EMS acres. Shown in Figure 15, over the next ten years, there is a need for 1.59 acres The average cost per acre is multiplied by the need to find the projected capital need from growth ($516,750). Figure 15. Projected Demand for EMS Land Infrastructure I Level of Service Cost/unit Residential 0.010 per 1,000 persons EMS Land Acres $325,000 Nonresidential 0.003 1 per 1,000 veh.trips Growth-Related Need for EMS Land Year Population Nonres. Residential Nonresidential Total I �Vehicle Tr Acres Acres Acres Base 2023 544,590 948,256 5.44 2.84 8.28 Yea r 1 2024 568,015 959,629 5.68 2.87 8.55 Year 2 2025 591,946 971,000 5.91 2.91 8.82 Year 3 2026 602,628 982,369 6.02 2.94 8.96 Year 4 2027 613,310 993,737 6.13 2.98 9.11 Year 5 2028 623,991 1,005,103 6.23 3.01 9.24 Year 6 2029 634,673 1,016,467 6.34 3.04 9.38 Year 7 2030 645,355 1,027,830 6.45 3.08 9.53 Year 8 2031 653,566 1,039,020 6.53 3.11 9.64 Year 9 2032 661,776 1,050,206 6.61 3.15 9.76 Year 10 2033 669,987 1,061,389 6.69 3.18 9.87 Ten-Year Increase 125,397 113,134 1.25 0.34 1.59 Projected Expenditure $406,250 $110,500 $516,750 Growth-Related Expenditures for EMS Land $516,750 18 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS VEHICLES The current levels of service are combined with the population and vehicle trip projections to illustrate the need for new EMS vehicle units. Shown in Figure 16, over the next ten years, there is a need for 6.0 units. The average cost per unit is multiplied by the need to find the projected capital need from growth ($2,123,508). Figure 16. Projected Demand for EMS Vehicles Infrastructure I Level of Service Cost/Unit Residential 0.04 per 1,000 persons EMS Vehicles Units $353,918 Nonresidential 1 0.01 1 per 1,000 veh.trips Growth-Related Need for EMS Vehicles Year Population Nonres. Residential Nonresidential Total I Vehicle Trips Units Units Units Base 2023 544,590 948,256 20.6 10.4 31.0 Year 1 2024 568,015 959,629 21.5 10.5 32.0 Year 2 2025 591,946 971,000 22.4 10.6 33.0 Year 3 2026 602,628 982,369 22.8 10.8 33.6 Year 4 2027 613,310 993,737 23.3 10.9 34.2 Year 5 2028 623,991 1,005,103 23.7 11.0 34.7 Year 6 2029 634,673 1,016,467 24.1 11.1 35.2 Year 7 2030 645,355 1,027,830 24.5 11.3 35.8 Year 8 2031 653,566 1,039,020 24.8 11.4 36.2 Year 9 2032 661,776 1,050,206 25.1 11.5 36.6 Year 10 2033 669,987 1,061,389 25.4 11.6 37.0 Ten-Year Increase 125,397 113,134 4.8 1.2 6.0 Projected Expenditure $1,698,806 $424,702 $2,123,508 Growth-Related Expenditures for EMS Vehicles 0: 19 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS EQUIPMENT The current levels of service are combined with the population and vehicle trip projections to illustrate the need for new EMS equipment units. Shown in Figure 17, over the next ten years, there is a need for 41.9 units. The average cost per unit is multiplied by the need to find the projected capital need from growth ($796,100). Figure 17. Projected Demand for EMS Equipment Infrastructure I Level of Service Cost/Unit Residential 0.27 per 1,000 persons Equipment Units $19,000 Nonresidential 1 0.08 1 per 1,000 veh.trips Growth-Related Need for Equipment Year Population Nonres. Residential Nonresidential Total I �Vehicle Trips Units Units Units Base 2023 544,590 948,256 144.3 73.0 217.3 Year 1 2024 568,015 959,629 150.5 73.8 224.3 Year 2 2025 591,946 971,000 156.8 74.7 231.5 Year 3 2026 602,628 982,369 159.6 75.6 235.2 Year 4 2027 613,310 993,737 162.5 76.5 239.0 Year 5 2028 623,991 1,005,103 165.3 77.3 242.6 Year 6 2029 634,673 1,016,467 168.1 78.2 246.3 Year 7 2030 645,355 1,027,830 171.0 79.1 250.1 Year 8 2031 653,566 1,039,020 173.1 80.0 253.1 Year 9 2032 661,776 1,050,206 175.3 80.8 256.1 Year 10 2033 669,987 1,061,389 177.5 81.7 259.2 Ten-Year Increase 125,397 113,134 33.2 8.7 41.9 Projected Expenditure $630,800 $165,300 $796,100 Growth-Related Expenditures for Equipment 00 EMS DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CREDIT ANALYSIS Currently,there are no dedicated revenues being collected by the County to fund growth-related projects for EMS facilities. Furthermore, the maximum supportable impact fees are constructed to offset growth- related capital costs for facilities. Evidence is given in this chapter that the growth-related projected capital costs from new development will be almost entirely offset by the development impact fees. As a result, no revenue credit is necessary in the impact fee calculation. 20 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EMS INPUT VARIABLES AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Figure 18 provides a summary of the input variables (described in the chapter sections above) used to calculate the net cost per person and vehicle trip. The residential EMS Development Impact Fees are the product of persons per housing unit by type of dwelling unit multiplied by the total net capital cost per person.The nonresidential fees are the product of trips per 1,000 square feet multiplied by the net capital cost per nonresidential vehicle trip. The fees represent the highest supportable amount for each type of applicable land use and represent new growth's fair share of the cost for capital facilities.The County may adopt fees that are less than the amounts shown. However, a reduction in impact fee revenue will necessitate an increase in other revenues, a decrease in planned capital expenditures, and/or a decrease in levels of service. Figure 18. EMS Input Variables and Maximum Supportable Impact Fees ComponentFee Cost Cost EMS Facilities $44.91 $12.96 EMS Land $3.25 $0.98 EMS Vehicles $13.45 $3.89 Equipment $5.04 $1.46 Impact Fee Study $0.14 $0.10 Gross Total $66.79 $19.39 Net Total $66.79 $19.39 Residential SupportablePersons per Maximum Housing Type Hous Residential(per housing unit) Si ngl a Fa mi ly 2.62 Multifamily 1.81 Nonresidential DevelopmentVehicle Trips Maximum . .. Nonresidential(per 1,000 square feet) Reta i 1 14.06 Off ce 5.42 Industrial 2.44 Institutional 5.39 21 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS FOR EMS MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE IMPACT FEE This section summarizes the potential cash flow to Ada County if the EMS Development Impact Fee is implemented at the maximum supportable amounts. The cash flow projections are based on the assumptions detailed in this chapter and the development projections discussed in Appendix B. The summary provides an indication of the impact fee revenue generated by new development. Shown at the bottom of the figure, the maximum supportable EMS impact fee is estimated to generate $10.5 million in revenue while there is a growth-related cost of $10.5 million. Thus, the impact fees offset all growth-related capital costs. Importantly,the level of service has included demand from within the cities of Ada County.To ensure that the County captures the full potential revenue of the impact fees an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) is necessary for the Cities to collect the County impact fees on its behalf. Those revenues would be remitted to the County periodically. In the case there are no IGAs, the County will collect $1 million in unincorporated areas (9.6 percent of the countywide growth-related capital costs). Figure 19. Projected Revenue from EMS Maximum Supportable Impact Fees Infrastructure Costs for EMS Facilities Total Cost I Growth Cost EMS Stations $7,096,915 $7,096,915 EMS Land 516,750 $516,750 EMS Vehicles $2,123,508 $2,123,508 Equipment $796,100 $796,100 Impact Fee Study, $32,740 $32,740 Total Expendituresl $10,566,0131 $10,566,013 Projected Development Impact Fee Revenue OfficeSingle Family Multifamily Retail - per uni per uni per KSF per KSF per KSF per KSF Year Housing Units Housing Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2023 182,342 37,833 41,938 21,670 41,668 25,911 1 2024 190,171 39,417 42,327 22,392 42,078 26,096 2 2025 198,180 41,005 42,715 23,114 42,487 26,281 3 2026 201,750 41,716 43,104 23,836 42,896 26,467 4 2027 205,321 42,426 43,492 24,558 43,305 26,652 5 2028 208,891 43,137 43,880 25,280 43,715 26,838 6 2029 212,462 43,847 44,268 26,002 44,124 27,023 7 2030 216,033 44,558 44,656 26,724 44,533 27,209 8 2031 218,774 45,110 45,037 27,434 44,936 27,392 9 2032 221,515 45,662 45,419 28,145 45,339 27,576 10 2033 224,256 46,215 45,800 28,856 45,741 27,760 Ten-Year Increase 41,914 8,382 3,862 7,186 4,073 1,849 Projected Revenue $7,334,992 $1,014,188 $1,054,248 $754,536 $191,431 $192,299 Projected Revenue=> $10,542,000 Projected Expenditures=> $10,566,000 Non-Impact Fee Funding=> $24,000 22 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study PROPORTIONATE SHARE ANALYSIS Development impact fees for Ada County are based on reasonable and fair formulas or methods. The fees do not exceed a proportionate share of the costs incurred or to be incurred by the County in the provision of system improvements to serve new development. The County will fund non-growth-related improvements with non-development impact fee funds as it has in the past. Specified in the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act(Idaho Code 67-8207),several factors must be evaluated in the development impact fee study and are discussed below. 1) The development impact fees for Ada County are based on new growth's share of the costs of previously built projects along with planned public facilities as provided by Ada County. Projects are included in the County's capital improvements plan and will be included in annual capital budgets. 2) TischlerBise estimated development impact fee revenue based on the maximum supportable development impact fees for the one,countywide service area; results are shown in the cash flow analyses in this report. Development impact fee revenue will entirely fund growth-related improvements less funding from other sources (i.e., federal and state grants). 3) TischlerBise has evaluated the extent to which new development may contribute to the cost of public facilities. 4) The relative extent to which properties will make future contributions to the cost of existing public facilities has also been evaluated in regards to existing debt. Outstanding debt for growth's portion of already constructed facilities will be paid from development impact fee revenue, therefore a future revenue credit is not necessary. 5) The County will evaluate the extent to which newly developed properties are entitled to a credit for system improvements that have been provided by property owners or developers.These"site- specific" credits will be available for system improvements identified in the annual capital budget and long-term Capital Improvements Plans. Administrative procedures for site-specific credits should be addressed in the development impact fee ordinance. 6) Extraordinary costs, if any, in servicing newly developed properties should be addressed through administrative procedures that allow independent studies to be submitted to the County. These procedures should be addressed in the development impact fee ordinance. One service area represented by Ada County is appropriate for the fees herein. 7) The time-price differential inherent in fair comparisons of amounts paid at different times has been addressed. All costs in the development impact fee calculations are given in current dollars with no assumed inflation rate over time. Necessary cost adjustments can be made as part of the annual evaluation and update of development impact fees. 23 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study IMPLEMENTATIONADMINISTRATION The Idaho Act requires jurisdictions to form a Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee. The committee must have at least five members with a minimum of two members active in the business of real estate, building, or development.The committee acts in an advisory capacity and is tasked to do the following: • Assist the governmental entity in adopting land use assumptions; • Review the capital improvements plan, and proposed amendments, and file written comments; • Monitor and evaluate implementation of the capital improvements plan; • File periodic reports, at least annually, with respect to the capital improvements plan and report to the governmental entity any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the development impact fees; and • Advise the governmental entity of the need to update or revise land use assumptions,the capital improvements plan, and development impact fees. Per the above, the County formed a Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee (DIFAC). TischlerBise and County staff met with the DIFAC during the process and provided information on land use assumptions, level of service and cost assumptions, and draft development impact fee schedules. This report reflects comments and feedback received from the DIFAC. The County must develop and adopt a capital improvements plan (CIP)that includes those improvements for which fees were developed. The Idaho Act defines a capital improvement as an "improvement with a useful life of ten years or more, by new construction or other action,which increases the service capacity of a public facility." Requirements for the CIP are outlined in Idaho Code 67-8208. Certain procedural requirements must be followed for adoption of the CIP and the development impact fee ordinance. Requirements are described in detail in Idaho Code 67-8206.The County has a CIP that meets the above requirements. TischlerBise recommends that development impact fees be updated annually to reflect recent data. One approach is to adjust for inflation in construction costs by means of an index like the RSMeans or Engineering News Record (ENR).This index can be applied against the calculated development impact fee. If cost estimates change significantly the County should evaluate an adjustment to the CIP and development impact fees. Idaho's enabling legislation requires an annual development impact fees report that accounts for fees collected and spent during the preceding year(Idaho Code 67-8210). Development impact fees must be deposited in interest-bearing accounts earmarked for the associated capital facilities as outlined in capital improvements plans.Also,fees must be spent within eight years of when they are collected (on a first in, first out basis) unless the local governmental entity identifies in writing (a) a reasonable cause why the 24 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study fees should be held longer than eight years;and (b)an anticipated date by which the fees will be expended but in no event greater than eleven years from the date they were collected. Credits must be provided for in accordance with Idaho Code Section 67-8209 regarding site-specific credits or developer reimbursements for system improvements that have been included in the development impact fee calculations. Project improvements normally required as part of the development approval process are not eligible for credits against development impact fees. Specific policies and procedures related to site-specific credits or developer reimbursements for system improvements should be addressed in the ordinance that establishes the County's fees. The general concept is that developers may be eligible for site-specific credits or reimbursements only if they provide system improvements that have been included in CIP and development impact fee calculations. If a developer constructs a system improvement that was included in the fee calculations, it is necessary to either reimburse the developer or provide a credit against the fees in the area that benefits from the system improvement.The latter option is more difficult to administer because it creates unique fees for specific geographic areas. Based on TischlerBise's experience, it is better for a reimbursement agreement to be established with the developer that constructs a system improvement. For example, if a developer elects to construct a system improvement, then a reimbursement agreement can be established to payback the developer from future development impact fee revenue. The reimbursement agreement should be based on the actual documented cost of the system improvement, if less than the amount shown in the CIP. However,the reimbursement should not exceed the CIP amount that has been used in the development impact fee calculations. 25 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study APPENDixA. LAND USE DEFINITIONS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT As discussed below, residential development categories are based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey.Ada County will collect impact fees from all new residential units. One-time impact fees are determined by the number of residential units. Single Family Units: 1. Single family detached is a one-unit structure detached from any other house, that is, with open space on all four sides. Such structures are considered detached even if they have an adjoining shed or garage.A one-family house that contains a business is considered detached as long as the building has open space on all four sides. 2. Single family attached (townhouse) is a one-unit structure that has one or more walls extending from ground to roof separating it from adjoining structures. In row houses (sometimes called townhouses), double houses, or houses attached to nonresidential structures, each house is a separate, attached structure if the dividing or common wall goes from ground to roof. 3. Mobile home includes both occupied and vacant mobile homes, to which no permanent rooms have been added. Mobile homes used only for business purposes or for extra sleeping space and mobile homes for sale on a dealer's lot,at the factory,or in storage are not counted in the housing inventory. Multifamily Units: 1. 2+ units (duplexes and apartments) are units in structures containing two or more housing units, further categorized as units in structures with "2, 3 or 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 19, 20 to 49,and 50 or more apartments." 2. Boat, RV, Van, etc. includes any living quarters occupied as a housing unit that does not fit the other categories(e.g., houseboats, railroad cars,campers,and vans). Recreational vehicles, boats, vans, railroad cars, and the like are included only if they are occupied as a current place of residence. 26 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CATEGORIES Nonresidential development categories used throughout this study are based on land use classifications from the book Trip Generation (ITE, 2021). A summary description of each development category is provided below. Retail: Establishments primarily selling merchandise, eating/drinking places, and entertainment uses. By way of example, Retail includes shopping centers, supermarkets, pharmacies, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, automobile dealerships, and movie theaters. Office: Establishments providing management, administrative, professional, or business services. By way of example, Office includes business offices, office parks, and corporate headquarters. Industrial: Establishments primarily engaged in the production and transportation of goods. By way of example, Industrial includes manufacturing plants, trucking companies, warehousing facilities, utility substations, power generation facilities, and telecommunications buildings. Institutional: Public and quasi-public buildings providing educational, social assistance, or religious services. By way of example, Institutional includes schools, universities, churches, daycare facilities, hospitals, health care facilities, and government buildings. 27 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study APPENDix B. DEMOGRAPHIC ASSUMPTIONS The data estimates and projections used in the study's calculations are detailed in this section. This chapter includes discussion and findings on: • Household/housing unit size • Current population and housing unit estimates • Residential projections • Current employment and nonresidential floor area estimates • Nonresidential projections • Functional population • Vehicle trip generation and projections POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS Impact fees often use per capita standards and persons per housing unit or persons per household to derive proportionate share fee amounts. Housing types have varying household sizes and, consequently, a varying demand on County infrastructure and services. Thus, it is important to differentiate between housing types and size. When persons per housing unit (PPHU) is used in the development impact fee calculations, infrastructure standards are derived using year-round population. In contrast, when persons per household (PPHH) is used in the development impact fee calculations, the fee methodology assumes all housing units will be occupied, thus requiring seasonal or peak population to be used when deriving infrastructure standards. Thus,TischlerBise recommends that fees for residential development in Ada County be imposed according to persons per housing units. Based on housing characteristics, TischlerBise recommends using two housing unit categories for the Impact Fee study: (1) Single Family and (2) Multifamily. Each housing type has different characteristics which results in a different demand on County facilities and services. Figure 20 shows the US Census American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimates data for Ada County. Single family units have a housing unit size of 2.62 persons and multifamily units have a housing unit size of 1.81 persons. Additionally,there is a housing mix of 83 percent single family and 17 percent multifamily. The estimates in Figure 20 are for household size calculations. Base year population and housing units are estimated with another, more recent data source. TischlerBise28 �iscaL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 20.Ada County Persons per Housing Unit Housing Housing Type -M. , I. Units . . . . Single Family[1] 415,557 158,890 153,711 2.70 83% Multifamily[2] 59,917 33,161 31,014 1.93 17% Total A-5,474 192,051 184,725 2.57 [1] Includes attached and detached single family homes and mobile homes [2] Includes all other types Source: U.S.Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates The US Census American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimates data for incorporated Ada County is shown in Figure 21.Single family units have a housing unit size of 2.59 persons and multifamily units have a housing unit size of 1.80 persons.Additionally, there is a housing mix of 81 percent single family and 19 percent multifamily. Figure 21. Incorporated Ada County Persons per Housing Unit Housing Housing Type Units . . . . Single Family[1] 363,946 140,266 135,502 2.69 81% Multifamily[2] 58,871 32,691 30,619 1.92 19% Total 422,817 172,957 166,121 2.55 [1] Includes attached and detached single family homes and mobile homes [2] Includes all other types Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates The US Census American Community Survey 2021 5-Year-Estimates data for unincorporated Ada County is shown in Figure 22. Single family units have a housing unit size of 2.77 persons and multifamily units have a housing unit size of 2.23 persons. Additionally, there is a housing mix of 98 percent single family and 2 percent multifamily. Figure 22. Unincorporated Ada County Persons per Housing Unit Housing HousingType M.. . . . . . . Single Family[1] 51,611 18,624 18,209 2.83 98% Multifamily[2] 1,046 470 395 2.65 2% Total 52,657 19,094 18,604 2.83 [1] Includes attached and detached single family homes and mobile homes [2] Includes all other types Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates BASE YEAR POPULATION AND HOUSING UNITS Available through the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS), the base year 2023 population in Ada County is estimated to be 554,590 residents shown in Figure 23. PPHU factors for TischlerBise 29 I IS(4L I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Incorporated and Unincorporated Ada County were used to estimate base year housing units for the whole County. The housing unit mix for Ada County was then applied to the total giving an estimated 182,342 single family units and 37,833 multifamily units. Figure 23.Ada County Base Year Population and Housing Units Base Year d2023 Population [1] 544,590 Housing Units[2] Single Family 182,342 Multifamily 37,833 Total Housing Units 220,175 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model [2] U.S.Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, TischlerBise analysis Available through COMPASS, the base year 2023 population in unincorporated Ada County is estimated to be 63,510 residents shown in Figure 24. PPHU factors for unincorporated Ada County were used to estimate base year housing units. The housing unit mix was then applied to the total giving an estimated 22,444 single family units and 566 multifamily units. Figure 24. Unincorporated Ada County Base Year Population and Housing Units Ada County Base Year Unim . .. 2023 Population [1] 63,510 Housing Units[2] Single Family 22,444 Multifamily 566 Total Housing Units 23,011 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model [2] U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, TischlerBise analysis The population estimate for unincorporated Ada County from COMPASS was subtracted from the population estimate for the whole of Ada County to find the estimated base year population for incorporated Ada County. Shown in Figure 25 the estimated population is 481,080. PPHU factors for incorporated Ada County were used to estimate base year housing units. The housing unit mix was then applied to the total giving an estimated 159,898 single family units and 37,266 multifamily units. TischlerBise 30 I IS(4L I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 25. Incorporated Ada County Base Year Population and Housing Units Ada County Base Year Incorporated i Population [1] 481, 880 Housing Units [21 Single Family 159,898 Multifamily 37,266 Total Housing Units 197,164 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model [2] U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, TischlerBise analysis Tischl re Bise 31 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study POPULATION AND HOUSING UNIT PROJECTIONS The residential projections are based on a review of COMPASS published estimates, impact fee studies from cities and fire districts within Ada County,and PPHU factors. Impact fee studies comprising the main six cities within Ada County were used to affirm growth trends for whole county projections. From the 2023 base year housing unit totals, Ada County is projected to increase by 50,296 housing units over the next ten years. Additionally,there is a projected increase of 125,397 residents over the next ten years, a 23 percent increase. Figure 26.Ada County Residential Development Projections Base Year Total Population 1 544,5901 568,015 591,946 602,628 613,310 623,991 634,673 645,355 653,566 661,776 669,987 125,397 Percent Increase 4.3% 4.2% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 23.0% Housing Units Single Family 182,342 190,171 198,180 201,750 205,321 208,891 212,462 216,033 218,774 221,515 224,256 41,914 Multifamily 37,833 39,417 41,005 41,716 42,426 43,137 43,847 44,558 45,110 45,662 46,215 8,382 Total Housing Units 220,175 229,588 239,185 243,466 247,747 252,028 256,309 260,591 263,884 267,177 270,471 50,296 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; TischlerBise analysis From the 2023 base year housing unit totals for incorporated Ada County,there is a projected increase of 44,844 new housing units over the next ten years. Additionally,there is a projected increase of 110,415 residents in incorporated Ada County, a 23 percent increase. Figure 27. Incorporated Ada County Residential Development Projections IncorporatedAda County Base Year I Total i27 2028 2029 Population 1 481,0801 502,024 523,414 532,767 542,119 551,471 560,823 570,174 577,281 584,388 591,495 110,415 Percent Increase 4.4% 4.3% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 23.0% Housing Units Single Family 159,898 166,853 173,967 177,075 180,183 183,291 186,399 189,507 191,866 194,226 196,586 36,688 Multifamily 37,266 38,822 40,383 41,072 41,761 42,450 43,139 43,828 44,359 44,891 45,423 8,156 Total Housing Units 197,164 205,676 214,350 218,147 221,944 225,741 229,538 233,334 236,226 239,117 242,008 44,844 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; TischlerBise analysis Tischl re Base 32 FISCAL, I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study From the 2023 base year housing unit total for unincorporated Ada County, there is a projected increase 5,453 new housing units over the next ten years. Additionally,there is a projected increase of 14,982 residents in unincorporated Ada County, a 23.6 percent increase. Figure 28. Unincorporated Ada County Residential Development Projections Ada County Base Year I Total Unincorporated Population 1 63,5101 65,991 68,532 69,861 71,190 72,520 73,850 75,181 76,284 77,388 78,492 14,982 Percent Increase 3.9% 3.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 23.6% Housing Units Single Family 22,444 23,318 24,213 24,675 25,138 25,600 26,063 26,526 26,908 27,289 27,671 5,227 Multifamily 566 594 622 644 665 687 708 730 751 771 792 226 Total Housing Units 23,011 23,912 24,835 25,319 25,803 26,287 26,772 27,256 27,658 28,061 28,464 5,453 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; Tischler6ise analysis Tisch Bise 33 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study CURRENT EMPLOYMENT AND NONRESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA The impact fee study will include nonresidential development as well. Available through COMPASS Job projections from the Traffic Analysis Zone Model (TAZ) and Communities in Motion 2050 there are an estimated 239,668 jobs in Ada County in 2023.These job projections are broken down by industry leading to an estimated 43,787 retail jobs, 130,780 officejobs,35,745 industrial jobs,and 29,356 institutional jobs in the base year. Base year nonresidential floor area estimates are based on Ada County GIS nonresidential parcel data. There is an estimated 131 million square feet of nonresidential floor area in Ada County. Retail and industrial sectors account for the greatest share with approximately 32 percent each. Institutional accounts for 20 percent, and office accounts for 17 percent of the total. Figure 29.Ada County Base Year Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Base Year %of Base Year %of Jobs[1] Total Sq.Ft.[2] Total Retail 43,787 18% 41,938,153 32% Office 130,780 55% 21,670,098 17% Industrial 35,745 15% 41,668,221 32% Institutional 29,356 12% 25,911,213 20% Total 239,668 100% 131,187,685 100% [1]COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050 [2] Source:Ada County GIS parcel data The job and nonresidential floor area estimates were further broken down into incorporated and unincorporated areas. Incorporated Ada County has an estimated 230,704 jobs in 2023. These job projections are broken down by industry leading to an estimated 42,925 retail jobs, 125,936 office jobs, 34,547 industrial jobs, and 27,296 institutional jobs in the base year. Additionally, there is an estimated 127 million square feet of nonresidential floor area in incorporated Ada County. Retail accounts for the greatest share at 32 percent. Industrial accounts for 31 percent, institutional accounts for 19 percent,and office accounts for 17 percent of the total. Figure 30. Incorporated Ada County Base Year Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Ada County Base Year %of Base Year %of IncorporatedJobs[1] Total Sq.Ft. [2] Total Retail 42,925 19% 41,286,649 32% Office 125,936 55% 21,370,261 17% Industrial 34,547 15% 39,887,518 31% Institutional 27,296 12% 24,605,169 19% Total 230,704 100% 127,149,597 100% [1]COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050 [2] Source:Ada County GIS parcel data TischlerB 34 ise �iscaL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Unincorporated Ada County has an estimated 8,964 jobs in 2023.These job projections are broken down by industry leading to an estimated 862 retail jobs, 4,844 office jobs, 1,198 industrial jobs, and 2,060 institutional jobs in the base year. Additionally, there is an estimated 4 million square feet of nonresidential floor area in unincorporated Ada County. Industrial accounts for the greatest share at 44 percent. Institutional accounts for 32 percent, retail accounts for 16 percent, and office accounts for 7 percent. Figure 31. Unincorporated Ada County Base Year Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area 7Retail Base Year %of Base Year %of Jobs[1] Total Sq.Ft.[2] Total 862 10% 651,504 16% 4,844 54% 299,837 7% 1,198 13% 1,780,703 44% Institutional 2,060 23% 1,306,044 32% Total 8,964 100% 4,038,088 100% [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion [2] Source:Ada County GIS parcel data EMPLOYMENT AND NONRESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA PROJECTIONS Job projections for the industry sectors are calculated with the Institution of Transportation Engineers' (ITE)square feet per employee averages shown in Figure 32. For retail industries the Shopping Center land use factors are used;for office the General Office factors are used;for industrial the Light Industrial factors are used;for institutional the Hospital factors are used. Figure 32. Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Employment Density Factors Employment Industry .. Retail 820 Shopping Center 1,000 Sq Ft 2.12 471 Office 710 General Office 1,000 Sq Ft 3.26 307 Industrial 110 Light Industrial 1,000 Sq Ft 1.57 637 Institutional 610 Hospital 1,000 Sq Ft 2.86 350 Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition (2021) TISCh BI$@ 35 I IS(4L I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Job and nonresidential growth projections over the next ten years for Ada County are shown in Figure 33. It is estimated there will be an increase of 43,283 jobs, an 18 percent increase from the base year.The majority of the increase comes from the office sector(54 percent). The nonresidential floor area projections are calculated by applying the ITE square feet per employee factors to the job growth. In the next ten years, the nonresidential floor area is projected to increase by 17 million square feet (rounded), a 13 percent increase from the base year. The office sector has the largest share of this growth at 42 percent. Figure 33.Ada County Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections Base Year Total Ada County 2023 2024 202S 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Jobs[l] Retail 43,787 44,612 45,437 46,262 47,086 47,910 48,734 49,557 50,367 51,177 51,986 8,199 Office 130,780 133,132 135,483 137,835 140,186 142,538 144,889 147,241 149,556 151,872 154,187 23,407 Industrial 35,745 36,388 37,030 37,673 38,315 38,958 39,600 40,242 40,875 41,507 42,139 6,394 Institutional 29,356 29,884 30,413 30,943 31,472 32,003 32,533 33,064 33,588 34,113 34,639 5,283 Total 1 239,6681 244,016 248,364 252,712 257,060 261,408 265,756 270,104 274,386 278,669 282,951 43,283 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 41,938 42,327 42,715 43,104 43,492 43,880 44,268 44,656 45,037 45,419 45,800 3,862 Office 21,670 22,392 23,114 23,836 24,558 25,280 26,002 26,724 27,434 28,145 28,856 7,186 Industrial 41,668 42,078 42,487 42,896 43,305 43,715 44,124 44,533 44,936 45,339 45,741 4,073 Institutional 25,911 26,096 26,281 26,467 26,652 26,838 27,023 27,209 27,392 27,576 27,760 1,849 Total 131,1881 132,893 134,598 136,302 138,007 139,712 141,417 143,121 144,800 146,479 148,1571 16,970 [11 COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [21 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 TISChler --ise 36 FISCAL, I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Job and nonresidential growth projections over the next ten years for incorporated Ada County are shown in Figure 34. It is estimated there will be an increase of 41,040 jobs, an 18 percent increase from the base year.The majority of the increase comes from the office sector(55 percent). The nonresidential floor area projections are calculated by applying the ITE square feet per employee factors to the job growth. In the next ten years, the nonresidential floor area is projected to increase by 16.1 million square feet (rounded), a 13 percent increase from the base year. The office sector has the largest share of this growth at 43 percent. Figure 34. Incorporated Ada County Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections IncorporatedAda County Base Year Total Jobs[l] Retail 42,925 43,696 44,466 45,236 46,004 46,772 47,539 48,306 49,059 49,811 50,561 7,636 Office 125,936 128,198 130,458 132,715 134,970 137,223 139,474 141,723 143,933 146,138 148,339 22,403 Industrial 34,547 35,168 35,787 36,407 37,025 37,643 38,261 38,878 39,484 40,089 40,693 6,146 Institutional 27,296 27,786 28,276 28,765 29,254 29,742 30,230 30,718 31,197 31,675 32,152 4,856 Total 1 230,7041 234,848 238,987 243,123 247,254 251,381 255,505 259,624 263,673 267,712 271,744 41,040 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 41,287 41,650 42,013 42,375 42,737 43,099 43,460 43,821 44,176 44,530 44,883 3,597 Office 21,370 22,065 22,758 23,451 24,144 24,835 25,526 26,217 26,895 27,572 28,248 6,878 Industrial 39,888 40,283 40,678 41,072 41,466 41,860 42,253 42,646 43,032 43,418 43,802 3,915 Institutional 24,605 24,777 24,948 25,119 25,291 25,461 25,632 25,803 25,970 26,138 26,305 1,699 Total 1 127,1501 128,774 130,397 132,018 133,637 135,255 136,872 138,487 140,074 141,657 143,2381 16,088 [11 COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [21 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 TischlerBise 37 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Job and nonresidential growth projections over the next ten years for unincorporated Ada County are shown in Figure 35. It is estimated there will be an increase of 2,244 jobs, a 25 percent increase from the base year.The majority of the increase comes from the office sector(45 percent). The nonresidential floor area projections are calculated by applying the ITE square feet per employee factors to the job growth. In the next ten years, the nonresidential floor area is projected to increase by 881,000 square feet, a 22 percent increase from the base year. The office sector has the largest share of this growth at 35 percent. Figure 35. Unincorporated Ada County Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections UnincorporatedAda County Base Year Total Jobs[1] Retail 862 916 971 1,026 1,082 1,138 1,194 1,251 1,308 1,366 1,425 563 Office 4,844 4,934 5,025 5,120 5,216 5,315 5,415 5,518 5,623 5,734 5,849 1,005 Industrial 1,198 1,220 1,243 1,266 1,290 1,314 1,339 1,365 1,391 1,418 1,446 248 Institutional 2,060 2,098 2,137 2,177 2,218 2,260 2,303 2,347 2,391 2,438 2,487 427 Total 1 8,9641 9,168 9,377 9,589 9,806 10,027 10,251 10,480 10,714 10,957 11,208 2,244 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 652 677 703 729 755 781 808 835 862 889 917 265 Office 300 327 356 384 414 444 475 507 539 573 608 308 Industrial 1,781 1,795 1,809 1,824 1,839 1,855 1,871 1,887 1,904 1,921 1,939 158 Institutional 1,306 1,319 1,333 1,347 1,361 1,376 1,391 1,406 1,422 1,438 1,456 150 Total 1 4,0381 4,119 4,201 4,285 4,370 4,457 4,545 4,634 4,726 4,821 4,920 881 [11 COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [21 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 TischlerBise 38 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RESIDENTIAL VEHICLE TRIPS BY HOUSING TYPE A customized trip rate is calculated for the single family and multifamily units in Ada County. In Figure 36, the most recent data from the US Census American Community Survey is inputted into equations provided by the ITE to calculate the trip ends per housing unit factor. A single family unit is estimated to generate 10.66 trip ends and a multifamily unit is estimated to generate 5.42 trip ends on an average weekday. Figure 36. Customized Residential Trip End Rates by Housing Type Households by Structure Type Tenure by Units Vehicles Single Multifamily Total Vehicles per in Structure Available' Family HH by Tenure Owner-Occupied 289,778 129,602 1,468 131,070 2.21 Renter-Occupied 85,906 24,109 29,546 53,655 1.60 Total 375,684 153,711 31,014 184,725 2.03 Housing Units3 158,890 33,161 192,051 HouseholdsPersons in Trip., Vehicles by Trip Average Local Trip National Trip Housing Type Single Family 415,557 1,157,628 324,995 2,118,200 1,637,914 9.43 Multifamily 59,917 137,129 50,518 199,334 168,231 4.54 Total 475,474 1,294,757 375,513 2,117,534 1,806,145 1.Vehicles available by tenure from Table B25046,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 2. Households by tenure and units in structure from Table B25032,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 3. Housing units from Table B25024,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 4.Total population in households from Table B25033,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 5.Vehicle trips ends based on persons using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2021). For single-family housing(ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.89*LN(persons)+1.72).To approximate the average population of the ITE studies, persons were divided by 19 and the equation result multiplied by 19. For multi-family housing(ITE 221),the fitted curve equation is(2.29*persons)-81.02(ITE 2017). 6.Vehicle trip ends based on vehicles available using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2021). For single-family housing (ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.99*LN(vehicles)+1.93).To approximate the average number of vehicles in the ITE studies,vehicles available were divided by 34 and the equation result multiplied by 34. For multi-family housing (ITE 221),the fitted curve equation is(3.94*vehicles)+293.58(ITE 2021). 7.Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition(2021). TischlerBise 39 �iscaL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study RESIDENTIAL VEHICLE TRIPS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS A vehicle trip end is the out-bound or in-bound leg of a vehicle trip. As a result, so to not double count trips, a standard 50 percent adjustment is applied to trip ends to calculate a vehicle trip. For example,the out-bound trip from a person's home to work is attributed to the housing unit and the trip from work back home is attributed to the employer. However, an additional adjustment is necessary to capture County residents' work bound trips that are outside of the County. The trip adjustment factor includes two components. According to the National Household Travel Survey, home-based work trips are typically 31 percent of out-bound trips (which are 50 percent of all trip ends).Also, utilizing the most recent data from the Census Bureau's web application "OnTheMap",17 percent of Ada County workers travel outside the County for work. In combination,these factors account for 3 percent of additional production trips(0.31 x 0.50 x 0.17=0.03).Shown in Figure 37, the total adjustment factor for residential housing units includes attraction trips (50 percent of trip ends) plus the journey-to-work commuting adjustment (3 percent of production trips)for a total of 53 percent. Figure 37. Residential Trip Adjustment Factor for Commuters Trip Adjustment Factor for Commuters Employed Ada County Residents(2020) 212,011 Residents Working in Ada County(2020) 175,359 Residents Commuting Outside of Ada County for Work 36,652 Percent Commuting Out of Ada County 17% Additional Production Trips 3% Standard Trip Adjustment Factor 50% Residential Trip Adjustment Factor 53% Source:U.S.Census,OnTheMap Application,2020 TischlerBise 40 �iscAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study NONRESIDENTIAL VEHICLE TRIPS Vehicle trip generation for nonresidential land uses are calculated by using ITE's average daily trip end rates and adjustment factors found in their recently published 11t"edition of Trip Generation.To estimate the trip generation in Ada County, the weekday trip end per 1,000 square feet factors listed in Figure 38 are used. Figure 38. Institute of Transportation Engineers Nonresidential Factors Employment ITE Demand Wkdy Trip Ends Wkdy Trip Ends Industry Code Land Use Unit per Dmd Unit I per Employee Retail 820 Shop in Center 1,000 S Ft 37.01 17.42 Offi ce 710 General Office 1,000 S Ft 10.84 3.33 Industrial 110 L ght Industrial 1,000 S Ft 4.87 3.10 Institutional 610 Hospital 1,000 S Ft 10.77 3.77 Source: Trip Generation,I nstitute of Transportation Engineers,11th Edition(2021) For nonresidential land uses, the standard 50 percent adjustment is applied to office, industrial, and institutional land uses. A lower vehicle trip adjustment factor is used for retail uses because this type of development attracts vehicles as they pass-by on arterial and collector roads. For example, when someone stops at a convenience store on their way home from work, the convenience store is not their primary destination. In Figure 39, the Institute for Transportation Engineers' land use code, daily vehicle trip end rate, and trip adjustment factor is listed for each land use. Figure 39. Daily Vehicle Trip Factors ITE Daily Vehicle Trip Adj. Daily Vehicle CodesLand Use Residential (per housing unit) Single Family 210 10.66 53% 5.65 Multifamily 220 5.42 53% 2.87 Nonresidential (per 1,000 square feet) Retail 820 37.01 38% 14.06 Office 710 10.84 50% 5.42 Industrial 110 4.87 50% 2.44 Institutional 610 10.77 50% 5.39 Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition (2021);'National Household Travel Survey, 2009 TischlerBise 41 I IS(4L I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study VEHICLE TRIP PROJECTIONS The base year vehicle trip totals and vehicle trip projections are calculated by combining the vehicle trip end factors,the trip adjustment factors, and the residential and nonresidential assumptions for housing stock and floor area. Countywide, residential land uses account for 1,138,874 vehicle trips and nonresidential land uses account for 948,256 vehicle trips in the base year shown in Figure 40. Through 2033, it is projected that daily vehicle trips will increase by 374,018 trips with the majority of the growth being generated by single family (63 percent) and retail (15 percent) development. Figure 40.Ada County Vehicle Trip Projections Base Year Total .. Residential Trips Single Family 1,030:196 1,074,429 1,119,675 1,139,848 1,160,022 1,180,195 1,200,368 1,220,542 1,236,029 1,251,516 1,267,003 236,807 Multifamily 108679 113,228 117,791 119,832 121,873 123,915 125,956 127,997 129,583 131,170 132,756 24,077 Subtotal 1,138,874 1,187,658 1,237,466 1,259,681 1,281,895 1,304,110 1,326,324 1,348,539 1,365,612 1,382,685 1,399,759 260,884 Nonresidential Trips Retail 589,810 595,277 600,742 606,204 611,664 617,121 622,576 628,029 633,398 638,762 644,120 54,310 Office 117,452 121,365 125,278 129,191 133,103 137,016 140,929 144,841 148,694 152,547 156,400 38,948 Industrial 101,462 102,459 103,456 104,452 105,449 106,445 107,442 108,438 109,419 110,399 111,380 9,918 Institutional 139,532 140,528 141,524 142,522 143,521 144,520 145,520 146,521 147,509 148,498 149,489 9,957 Subtotal 948,256 959,629 971,000 982,369 993,737 1,005,103 1,016,467 1,027,830 1,039,020 1,050,206 1,061,389 113,134 Vehicle Trips Grand Total 2,087,130 2,147,286 2,208,466 2,242,050 2,275,632 2,309,212 2,342,791 2,376,368 2,404,632 2,432,892 2,461,148 374,018 Source:Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition (2021) TISChler --ise 42 FISCAL, I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study In incorporated Ada County, residential land uses account for 1,010,441 vehicle trips and nonresidential land uses account for 926,099 vehicle trips in the base year shown in Figure 41. Through 2033, it is projected that daily vehicle trips will increase by 337,251 trips with the majority of the growth being generated by single family (61 percent) and retail (15 percent) development. Figure 41. Incorporated Ada County Vehicle Trip Projections Ada County Base Year Total orp, 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Residential Trips Single Family 903,389 942,688 982,879 1,000,440 1,018,000 1,035,559 1,053,117 1,070,675 1,084,006 1,097,336 1,110,670 207,281 Multifamily 107,051 111,521 116,004 117,983 119,963 121,942 123,921 125,899 127,427 128,954 130,481 23,429 Subtotal 1,010,4411 1,054,210 1,098,883 1,118,423 1,137,962 1,157,500 1,177,038 1,196,575 1,211,433 1,226,289 1,241,151 230,710 Nonresidential Trips Retail 580,647 585,754 590,856 595,953 601,044 606,131 611,213 616,291 621,280 626,259 631,228 50,580 Office 115,827 119,591 123,351 127,107 130,859 134,608 138,353 142,095 145,772 149,442 153,103 37,277 Industrial 97,126 98,089 99,050 100,011 100,970 101,929 102,887 103,843 104,784 105,722 106,658 9,532 Institutional 132,499 133,423 134,346 135,268 136,189 137,110 138,029 138,948 139,851 140,752 141,651 9,152 Subtotal 926,099 936,857 947,603 958,338 969,063 979,778 990,482 1,001,177 1,011,687 1,022,174 1,032,640 106,541 Vehicle Trips Grand Total 11,936,5391 1,991,066 2,046,486 2,076,761 2,107,025 2,137,278 2,167,520 2,197,752 2,223,120 2,248,464 2,273,791 337,251 Source:Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation,11th Edition (2021) 43 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study In unincorporated Ada County, residential land uses account for 128,434 vehicle trips and nonresidential land uses account for 22,157 vehicle trips in the base year shown in Figure 42. Through 2033, it is projected that daily vehicle trips will increase by 36,772 trips with the majority of the growth being generated by single family (80 percent) and retail (10 percent) development. Figure 42. Unincorporated Ada County Vehicle Trip Projections Ada County Base Year Total Unincorl 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Residential Trips Single Family 126,807 131,741 136,796 139,409 142,022 144,636 147,251 149,866 152,023 154,180 156,338 29,532 Multifamily 1,627 1,707 1,787 1,849 1,911 1,973 2,035 2,097 2,157 2,216 2,275 648 Subtotal 128,4341 133,448 138,583 141,258 143,933 146,609 149,286 151,964 154,179 156,396 158,613 30,180 Nonresidential Trips Retail 9,163 9,523 9,886 10,251 10,619 10,990 11,363 11,739 12,118 12,503 12,893 3,730 Office 1,625 1,774 1,927 2,084 2,244 2,408 2,575 2,746 2,922 3,106 3,297 1,672 Industrial 4,336 4,370 4,406 4,442 4,479 4,517 4,555 4,594 4,635 4,677 4,721 385 Institutional 7,033 7,105 7,178 7,254 7,331 7,410 7,491 7,573 7,658 7,746 7,838 805 Subtotal 22,157 22,772 23,397 24,031 24,673 25,325 25,985 26,652 27,333 28,032 28,749 6,592 Vehicle Trips Grand Tota 1 50,5911 156,220 161,980 165,288 168,606 171,934 175,271 178,616 181,512 184,428 187,363 36,772 Source:Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation,11th Edition (2021) 44 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study APPENDIX C. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES CALL VOLUME DENSITY HEAT . . Shown below in Figure 43 is a heat map showing call volume density for Ada County EMS. Red and yellow areas indicate higher call volume. The heat map illustrates areas where station space will be needed to address future demand from growth. Figure 43. EMS Call Volume Density II® IR rUPPCR DEER FLAT l SLATE �SLATERS F_ at------ ul - ' I I � 45 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Below in Figure 44 is the 10 Year planned placement of future stations to maintain the current level of service and accommodate growth. Figure 44. EMS Future Station Placement E3 All 12 9eir _ ..�Gr.q • i r Utr �mf � r:e... ..a.,Y.rAe.e.....dwrw,�,.,n.[.•C..d.ln rcl[.c....vWi�H l'A VF'-+''. 46 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 Exhibit A.6 AGREEMENT NO. 30465 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A & 67-23281 Parties to Agreement: Ada County County Ada County Board of Commissioners 200 W.Front Street, Third Floor Boise, Idaho 83702 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 8, 2025 ("Effective Date")by and between Ada County ("County") and the City of Meridian("City") as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plans ("CIPs") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 1 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements. 1.4 Capital Improvements Plans and/or CIPs: Means and refers to, collectively, the May 24, 2024 Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study and the May 24, 2024 Coroner Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study, all of which were prepared for and adopted by the County. 1.5 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.6 City Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.7 County: Means and refers to Ada County, Idaho, Parry to this Agreement. 1.8 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the County and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.9 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.10 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIPs. The CIPs are intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development, protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers, privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the County and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. 2.4. The County is responsible for providing coroner-and jail-related services on a countywide basis. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 2.5. The County is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the County's ability to provide coroner- and jail-related services are affected by said development. 2.6 The County has provided the City with the CIPs,which were prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIPs in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3) and 67-8208(1). 2.8 The County has requested that the City adopt the CIPs in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however,that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIPs. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIPs and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The County shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee shall serve as an advisory committee to the Ada County Board of Commissioners and City Council and is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The County shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIPs with the City on or before June 30, 2025,to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIPs prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 SECTION 4 SERVICE AREA 4.1 Idaho Code § 67-8203(26) provides that the Parties can identify a geographic area by an intergovernmental agreement in which specific public facilities provide services to development within that geographic area on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles or both. 4.2 The CIPs and this Agreement define the Service Area as the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. SECTION 5 COSTS SPECIFIC TO COUNTY 5.1 The County shall pay the following costs: 5.1.1 All costs associated with the Advisory Committee; and 5.1.2 All County costs associated with drafting this Agreement and any amendment or termination of the same; and 5.1.3 All costs associated with the County's performance of this Agreement; and 5.1.4 All legal costs and fees associated with any action brought by a third parry concerning the validity of the CIPs or this Agreement. SECTION 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 After the Advisory Committee files its written comments concerning the CIPs with the City in accordance with the Act and Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement,the City shall consider the adoption of the CIPs in accordance with the Act. 6.2 If the City adopts the CIPs, the City agrees to consider the possibility of adopting a City ordinance concerning the countywide development impact fees delineated in the CIPs, but only after (a) the Parties negotiate and agree on a new intergovernmental agreement for that purpose and (b) all the incorporated cities in Ada County have adopted (1) the CIPs and(2)the ordinances necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. 6.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that: 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt the CIPs; and ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 4 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 6.3.2 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt an ordinance implementing countywide development impact fees. SECTION 7 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 To the extent permitted by law, County shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for all claims, losses, actions, damages, judgements, costs, expenses arising out of or in connection with any acts or omissions of the County related to the CIPs or this Agreement. In the event of such claim, County shall defend such allegations,and County shall bear all costs, fees, and expenses of such defense, including,but not limited to, all attorney fees and expenses,court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses. SECTION 8 TERM/TERMINATION/AMENDMENT 8.1 Term. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2029, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 8.2 of this Agreement. 8.2 Party Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party upon ninety (90) day notice in writing to the other Party. 8.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the Parties. SECTION 9 NOTICE AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS 9.1 Notices. All notices,requests or demands to a party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given or served upon the other party by US Mail or email addressed as set forth below. 9.2 Contact Information. The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the County is as follows: Ada County Development Services Attn: Director 200 W. Front Street, Boise, ID 83702 dswebportalcontactus@adacounty.id.gov With Copy to: Ada County Prosecutor's Office Attn: Chief Civil Deputy 200 W. Front Street, Room 3191 Boise, Idaho 83702 adacountyprosecutor@adacounty.id.gov ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 5 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 9.3 The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the City is as follows: City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 cjohnson@meridiancity.org SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 Third Party Beneficiaries. Each Parry to this Agreement intends that this Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person or legal entity other than the Parties hereto. 10.2 Electronic and Non-Electronic Signatures: The County and City may execute this Agreement using handwritten signatures or electronic signatures, in accordance with Idaho's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The Parties acknowledge and agree that both signature methods are equally valid and binding for the purposes of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. Should any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, parties, or circumstances, for any reason be declared illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal or invalid provision had not been contained herein. 10.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted by the laws of the state of Idaho. Venue shall be Ada County, Idaho. 10.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements,promises,or inducements made by either Party, or agents of either Parry, whether oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both Parties. 10.6 Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence for all events and obligations to be performed under this Agreement. 10.7 Attorneys' Fees. If either Parry brings any action or proceedings to enforce, protect or establish any right or remedy under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to any other relief awarded. 10.8 Assignment. No Parry may assign this Agreement or any interest therein. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 6 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of Ada County Commissioners DocuSigned by: By: 4/8/2025 1 4:16 PM MDT � Rod Beck, Commissioner DocuSigned by: 4/9/2025 1 2:14 PM MDT By: Ryan Davidson, Commissioner FDocuSigned by::By: �---0* 4/10/2025 1 12:21 PM MDT Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: ZDocugned by: Si 4/10/2025 2:38 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of Meridian By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-24-2025 ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 7 Exhibit A.7 A OF14 Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Submitted to: Ada County, Idaho May 24, 2024 Prepared by: TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING 999 W Main St Suite 100 Boise, ID 83702 800.424.4318 www.tischlerbise.com Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study [Page intentional blank] i TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Impact Fee Study Ada County, Idaho ExecutiveSummary .......................................................................................................................................1 Idaho Development Impact Fee Enabling Legislation ...............................................................................2 Summary of Capital Improvement Plans and Development Impact Fees.................................................3 Methodologiesand Credits ...................................................................................................................3 FeeMethodologies................................................................................................................................4 CapitalImprovement Plan.....................................................................................................................5 Maximum Supportable Development Impact Fees by Type of Land Use.............................................6 CapitalImprovement Plan.............................................................................................................................7 CapitalImprovement Plan.....................................................................................................................9 Funding Sources for Capital Improvements........................................................................................10 Jail Development Impact Fee Analysis.........................................................................................................11 Cost Allocation for Jail Infrastructure......................................................................................................12 Jail Level of Service and Cost Analysis .....................................................................................................13 JailCapacity Analysis............................................................................................................................13 JailAncillary Facilities ..........................................................................................................................13 JailBeds................................................................................................................................................14 Share of the Development Impact Fee Study......................................................................................15 Jail Capital Improvements Needed to Serve Growth ..............................................................................16 JailAncillary Facilities ..........................................................................................................................16 JailBeds................................................................................................................................................17 Jail Development Impact Fee Credit Analysis..........................................................................................18 Jail Input Variables and Development Impact Fees.................................................................................18 Cash Flow Projections for Jail Maximum Supportable Impact Fee .........................................................19 Proportionate Share Analysis ......................................................................................................................20 Implementation and Administration...........................................................................................................21 Appendix A. Land Use Definitions ...............................................................................................................23 ResidentialDevelopment.........................................................................................................................23 Nonresidential Development Categories ................................................................................................24 Appendix B. Demographic Assumptions .....................................................................................................25 Population and Housing Characteristics..................................................................................................25 Base Year Population and Housing Units.................................................................................................26 Population and Housing Unit Projections................................................................................................29 Current Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area..............................................................................31 Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections........................................................................32 VehicleTrip Generation...........................................................................................................................36 Residential Vehicle Trips by Housing Type..........................................................................................36 Residential Vehicle Trips Adjustment Factors.........................................................................................37 ii TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Nonresidential Vehicle Trips....................................................................................................................38 VehicleTrip Projections...........................................................................................................................39 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ada County, Idaho, retained TischlerBise, Inc. to calculate the impact fees to be imposed on new development to meet the new demands generated for public facilities in the County. It is the intent of Ada County to evaluate and establish impact fees for jail facilities.This report presents the methodologies and calculations used to generate current levels of service and maximum supportable impact fees. It is intended to serve as supporting documentation for the evaluation and establishment of impact fees in Ada County. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the County's compliance with Idaho Statutes as authorized by the Idaho Legislature. Consistent with the statutory authorization for development impact fees (Idaho Code 67-8202(1-4)), it is the intent of Ada County to: 1. Collect impact fees to ensure that adequate public facilities are available to serve new growth and development; 2. Promote orderly growth and development by establishing uniform standards by which local governments may require that those who benefit from new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new public facilities needed to serve new growth and development; 3. Establish minimum standards for the adoption of development impact fee ordinances by government entities; 4. Ensure that those who benefit from new growth and development are required to pay no more than their proportionate share of the cost of public facilities needed to serve new growth and development and to prevent duplicate and ad hoc development requirements; Impact fees are one-time payments used to construct system improvements needed to accommodate new development. An impact fee represents new growth's fair share of capital facility needs. By law, impact fees can only be used for capital improvements, not operating or maintenance costs. Impact fees are subject to legal standards, which require fulfillment of three key elements: need, benefit and proportionality. • First, to justify a fee for public facilities, it must be demonstrated that new development will create a need for capital improvements. • Second, new development must derive a benefit from the payment of the fees (i.e., in the form of public facilities constructed within a reasonable timeframe). • Third, the fee paid by a particular type of development should not exceed its proportional share of the capital cost for system improvements. 1 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study TischlerBise evaluated possible methodologies and documented appropriate demand indicators by type of development for the levels of service and fees. Local demographic data and improvement costs were used to identify specific capital costs attributable to growth. This report includes summary tables indicating the specific factors, referred to as level of service standards, used to derive the impact fees. The geographic area for the jail impact fees is countywide. These facilities provide a countywide benefit and are services not provided by the cities within Ada County. IDAHO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ENABLING LEGISLATION The Enabling Legislation governs how development fees are calculated for municipalities in Idaho. All requirements of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act(hereafter referred to as the Idaho Act) have been met in the supporting documentation prepared by TischlerBise. There are four requirements of the Idaho Act that are not common in the development impact fee enabling legislation of other states. This overview offers further clarification of these unique requirements. First, as specified in 67-8204(2) of the Idaho Act, "development impact fees shall be calculated on the basis of levels of service for public facilities . . . applicable to existing development as well as new growth and development." Second, Idaho requires a Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) [see 67-8208]. The CIP requirements are summarized in this report, with detailed documentation provided in the discussion on infrastructure. Third,the Idaho Act also requires documentation of any existing deficiencies in the types of infrastructure to be funded by development impact fees [see 67-8208(1)(a)]. The intent of this requirement is to prevent charging new development to cure existing deficiencies. In the context of development impact fees for Ada County, the term "deficiencies" means a shortage or inadequacy of current system improvements when measured against the levels of service to be applied to new development. It does not mean a shortage or inadequacy when measured against some "hoped for" level of service. TischlerBise used the current infrastructure cost per service unit (i.e., existing standards), or future levels of service where appropriate, multiplied by the projected increase in service units over an appropriate planning timeframe,to yield the cost of growth-related system improvements.The relationship between these three variables can be reduced to a mathematical formula, expressed as A x B = C. In section 67- 8204(16), the Idaho Act simply reorganizes this formula, stating the cost per service unit (i.e., development impact fee) may not exceed the cost of growth-related system improvements divided by the number of projected service units attributable to new development (i.e., A = C - B). By using existing infrastructure standards to determine the need for growth-related capital improvements, Ada County ensures the same level-of-service standards are applicable to existing and new development. Using existing infrastructure standards also means there are no existing deficiencies in the current system that must be corrected from non-development impact fee funding. 2 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Fourth, Idaho requires a proportionate share determination [see 67-8207]. Basically, local government must consider various types of applicable credits and/or other revenues that may reduce the capital costs attributable to new development.The development impact fee methodologies and the cash flow analysis have addressed the need for credits to avoid potential double payment for growth-related infrastructure. SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES METHODOLOGIES AND CREDITS Development impact fees can be calculated by any one of several legitimate methods. The choice of a particular method depends primarily on the service characteristics and planning requirements for each facility type. Each method has advantages and disadvantages in a particular situation, and to some extent can be interchangeable, because each allocates facility costs in proportion to the needs created by development. Reduced to its simplest terms, the process of calculating development impact fees involves two main steps: (1) determining the cost of development-related capital improvements and (2) allocating those costs equitably to various types of development. In practice, though, the calculation of impact fees can become quite complicated because of the many variables involved in defining the relationship between development and the need for facilities. The following paragraphs discuss three basic methods for calculating development impact fees, and how each method can be applied. Cost Recovery or Buy-In Fee Calculation. The rationale for the cost recovery approach is that new development is paying for its share of the useful life and remaining capacity of facilities already built or land already purchased from which new growth will benefit. This methodology is often used for systems that were oversized such as sewer and water facilities. Incremental Expansion Fee Calculation.The incremental expansion method documents the current level of service (LOS)for each type of public facility in both quantitative and qualitative measures, based on an existing service standard (such as park land acres per 1,000 residents). This approach ensures that there are no existing infrastructure deficiencies or surplus capacity in infrastructure. New development is only paying its proportionate share for growth-related infrastructure. An incremental expansion cost method is best suited for public facilities that will be expanded in regular increments, with LOS standards based on current conditions in the community. Plan-Based Fee Calculation. The plan-based method allocates costs for a specified set of improvements to a specified amount of development. Facility plans identify needed improvements, and land use plans identify development. In this method, the total cost of relevant facilities is divided by total demand to calculate a cost per unit of demand. Then, the cost per unit of demand is multiplied by the amount of demand per unit of development (e.g., housing units or square feet of building area) in each category to arrive at a cost per specific unit of development (e.g., single family detached unit). 3 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Credits. Regardless of the methodology, a consideration of "credits" is integral to the development of a legally valid impact fee methodology. There are two types of "credits," each with specific and distinct characteristics, but both of which should be addressed in the calculation of development impact fees.The first is a credit due to possible double payment situations.This could occur when contributions are made by the property owner toward the capital costs of the public facility covered by the impact fee. This type of credit is integrated into the impact fee calculation.The second is a credit toward the payment of a fee for dedication of public sites or improvements provided by the developer and for which the facility fee is imposed. This type of credit is addressed in the administration and implementation of a facility fee program. FEE METHODOLOGIES Of the fee methodologies discussed above, the incremental expansion method and the cost recovery method are used to calculate jail impact fees for Ada County.Where capacity is sufficient to serve current demand the incremental expansion method documents the current Level of Service (LOS) for each type of public facility. While the cost of the impact fee study is captured through the cost recovery method. Additionally,Ada County anticipates working with the cities to collect the jail impact fee countywide.The following table summarizes the method(s) used to derive the jail impact fee in Ada County. Figure 1. Summary of Impact Fee Methodologies Fee Category Service Area Cost Incremental Plan-Based Cost Recovery Expansion Allocation Jail Countywide Impact Fee Study Jail Facilities Person&Vehicle Trips 4 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The jail development impact fee is based on the existing level of service provided for jail facilities. The development impact fee is calculated for residential and nonresidential development.To serve projected growth at current levels of service,the jail will need to provide 16,555 square feet of new ancillary facility space and 178 new jail beds over the next 10 years. Listed in Figure 2 are the capital improvement plans for facility expansion for the next 10 years. The planned expansions are consistent with growth-related needs to continue providing the current level of service. Important to note is that of the total $16 million ancillary facility costs, only $12.5 million will be captured by the impact fees. The CIP also includes non- growth-related projects which will be funded with non-impact fee revenue. Figure 2.Jail Capital Improvement Plan 10-Year Jail 10-Year General Fund Capital Improvement Plan Square Feet Total • .. Other Sources Pod E Expansion (294 beds) 39,984 $32,843,108 $19,936,000 $12,907,108 Pod E Locker Rooms 3,000 $2,464,219 $2,464,219 $0 Warehouse 10,562 $6,967,817 $6,967,817 $0 Second Secured Entrance 6,719 $6,352,666 $6,352,666 $0 New Booking Room 1,000 $270,229 $270,229 $0 Kitchen Remodel 4,609 $4,992,463 $0 $4,992,463 Camera Installation - $1,322,421 $0 $1,322,421 Restroom& Locker Room Remodel $138,831 $0 $138,831 Jail Management System Upgrade - $4,000,000 $0 $4,000,000 Total 65,874 $59,351,755 $35,990,932 $23,360,823 Growth-Related Pod Expansion $19,936,000 Pod Expansion Revenue $19,936,000 Growth-Related Pod Expansion Funding Gap $0 Growth-Related Anc. Facility Expansion $16,054,932 Anc. Facility Expansion Revenue $12,499,025 Growth-Related Anc.Facility Funding Gap $3,555,907 5 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES BY TYPE OF LAND USE Figure 3 provides a schedule of the maximum supportable development impact fees by type of land use for Ada County. The fees represent the highest supportable amount for each type of applicable land use and represents new growth's fair share of the cost for capital facilities. The County may adopt fees that are less than the amounts shown. However,a reduction in impact fee revenue will necessitate an increase in other revenues, a decrease in planned capital expenditures, and/or a decrease in levels of service. The fees for residential development are to be assessed per housing unit based on type. For nonresidential development, the fees are assessed per square foot of floor area (for illustrative purposes the nonresidential fee is listed per 1,000 square feet of development). Nonresidential development categories are consistent with the terminology and definitions contained in the reference book,Trip Generation 111n Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These definitions are provided in the Appendix A. Land Use Definitions. Importantly, the Ada County Jail provides a countywide service and benefit. Thus, the impact fee study has calculated the maximum supportable fee based on a countywide level of service. In this case, Figure 3 lists maximum amounts for all development within Ada County. Figure 3. Summary of Maximum Supportable Development Impact Fees -Countywide DevelopmentJail Maximum Supportable Residential (per housing unit) Single Family Multifamily Nonresidential(per 1,000 square feet) Retail ' Office Industrial Institutional 6 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study IMPROVEMENTCAPITAL The following section provides a summary of the Capital Improvement Plan depicting growth-related capital demands and costs on which the fees are based. First, Figure 4 and Figure 5 lists the projected growth over the next ten years in Ada County.Overall,there is an estimated 23 percent increase in residential development (125,397 new residents and 50,296 new housing units) and an 18 percent increase in nonresidential development (43,283 new jobs and 16.9 million square feet of development). Further details on the development projections are provided in Appendix B. Demographic Assumptions. 7 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 4.Ten-Year Projected Residential Growth Base Year Total 2026 2027i i29 2030 2031i Population 1 544,5901 568,015 591,946 602,628 613,310 623,991 634,673 645,355 653,566 661,776 669,987 125,397 Percent Increase 4.3% 4.2% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 23.0% Housing Units Si ngl a Fa mi I y 182,342 190,171 198,180 201,750 205,321 208,891 212,462 216,033 218,774 221,515 224,256 41,914 Multifamily 37,833 39,417 41,005 41,716 42,426 43,137 43,847 44,558 45,110 45,662 46,215 8,382 Total Housing Units 220,175 229,588 239,185 243,466 247,747 252,028 256,309 260,591 263,884 267,177 270,471 50,296 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; TischlerBise analysis Figure 5.Ten-Year Projected Nonresidential Growth Base Year Total Ada County 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Jobs[l] Retail 43,787 44,612 45,437 46,262 47,086 47,910 48,734 49,557 50,367 51,177 51,986 8,199 Office 130,780 133,132 135,483 137,835 140,186 142,538 144,889 147,241 149,556 151,872 154,187 23,407 Industrial 35,745 36,388 37,030 37,673 38,315 38,958 39,600 40,242 40,875 41,507 42,139 6,394 Institutional 29,356 29,884 30,413 30,943 31,472 32,003 32,533 33,064 33,588 34,113 34,639 5,283 Total 1 239,6681 244,016 248,364 252,712 257,060 261,408 265,756 270,104 274,386 278,669 282,951 43,283 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 41,938 42,327 42,715 43,104 43,492 43,880 44,268 44,656 45,037 45,419 45,800 3,862 Office 21,670 22,392 23,114 23,836 24,558 25,280 26,002 26,724 27,434 28,145 28,856 7,186 Industrial 41,668 42,078 42,487 42,896 43,305 43,715 44,124 44,533 44,936 45,339 45,741 4,073 Institutional 25,911 26,096 26,281 26,467 26,652 26,838 27,023 27,209 27,392 27,576 27,760 1,849 Total 131,1881 132,893 134,598 136,302 138,007 139,712 141,417 143,121 144,800 146,479 148,1571 16,970 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [2]Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 8 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act requires Capital Improvement Plans to be updated regularly, at least once every five years (Idaho Code 67-8208(2)).This report projects revenue and fees based on a 10- year forecast in an effort to provide the public and elected officials with illustrative guidance of probable growth demands based on current trends however, per Idaho Code, it is expected that an update to all Capital Improvement Plans included in this study will occur within five years. FUNDING SOURCES FOR CURRENT DEFICIENCIES The majority of the CIP relates to the expansion of the Ada County Jail. A number of specific upgrades, replacements, and expansions to existing Jail facilities have also been proposed for fiscal year 2025 and beyond. In addition, it is estimated that$2,500,000 will be required for maintenance and repair of existing facilities over the next five years. Because replacement and addressing existing deficiencies are not eligible to be funded with impact fees,these costs will need to be funded by other sources,such as property taxes, in accordance with Idaho Code 67-8207(iv)(2)(h). The Board of Ada County Commissioners retain discretion and authority to fund deficiencies through the county's annual CIP budget process,accumulate savings annually in a construction fund,budget annually for one-time projects using unspent fund balance, or through the deferred maintenance budget annually appropriated to the Operations Department for these sorts of expenses. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN The jail development impact fee is based on the existing level of service provided for jail facilities. The development impact fee is calculated for residential and nonresidential development. Based on the 10- year growth projections,the following infrastructure is projected over the next ten years: • 16,555 square feet of new ancillary facility • 178 new jail beds • $32,435,000 growth-related costs to Ada County The projected demand is consistent with the Ada County Jail expansion plans. Currently,the department is exploring options for several expansions within the jail including a warehouse expansion and locker rooms for future Pod E. These projections are consistent with the Jail's Capital Improvement Plan shown in Figure 77. Important to note is that of the total$16 million ancillary facility costs,only$12.5 million will be captured by the impact fees. Also, there are four capital projects which are addressing non-growth- related project,thus not impact fee eligible. 9 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 7.Jail Capital Improvement Plan 10-Year Jail 10-Year I General Fund ImprovementCapital .. Other Sources Pod E Expansion (294 beds) 39,984 $32,843,108 $19,936,000 $12,907,108 Pod E Locker Rooms 3,000 $2,464,219 $2,464,219 $0 Warehouse 10,562 $6,967,817 $6,967,817 $0 Second Secured Entrance 6,719 $6,352,666 $6,352,666 $0 New Booking Room 1,000 $270,229 $270,229 $0 Kitchen Remodel 4,609 $4,992,463 $0 $4,992,463 Camera Installation - $1,322,421 $0 $1,322,421 Restroom& Locker Room Remodel $138,831 $0 $138,831 Jail Management System Upgrade - $4,000,000 $0 $4,000,000 Total 65,874 $59,351,755 $35,990,932 $23,360,823 Growth-Related Pod Expansion $19,936,000 Pod Expansion Revenue $19,936,000 Growth-Related Pod Expansion Funding Gap $0 Growth-Related Anc. Facility Expansion $16,054,932 Anc. Facility Expansion Revenue $12,499,025 Growth-Related Anc.Facility Funding Gap $3,555,907 FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS In determining the proportionate share of capital costs attributable to new development, the Idaho Development Fee Act states that local governments must consider historical, available, and alternative sources of funding for system improvements (Idaho Code 67-8207(2)). Currently, there are no dedicated revenues being collected by the County to fund growth-related projects for the infrastructure included in this study. Furthermore, the maximum supportable impact fees are constructed to offset the growth-related capital costs to the County for jail facilities. Evidence is given in the specific chapters of this report that the projected capital costs from new development will be offset by the development impact fees collection as long as the program is collected in the entire service area. Thus, no credits are needed in the impact fee calculation to offset double collection for growth-related capital costs. 10 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study DEVELOPMENTJAIL ANALYSIS The Jail Development Impact Fee is based on the cost per service unit method specified in Idaho Code 67- 8204(16), also referred to as the incremental expansion method elsewhere in this report. The jail components included in the impact fee analysis are: • Jail ancillary facilities • Jail beds • Share of the development impact fee study The residential portion of the fee is derived from the product of persons per housing unit by housing type multiplied by the net capital cost per person. To calculate nonresidential development impact fees, nonresidential vehicle trips are used as the demand indicator. Trip generation rates are highest for commercial developments, such as shopping centers, and lowest for industrial development. Office and institutional land uses trip rates fall between the other two categories. This ranking of trip rates is consistent with the relative demand for jail facilities from nonresidential development and thus are the best demand indicators. Other possible nonresidential demand indicators, such as employment or floor area, do not accurately reflect the demand for service. If employees per thousand square feet were used as the demand indicator, Jail Development Impact Fees would be too high for office and institutional development. If floor area were used as the demand indicator, the development impact fees would be too high for industrial development. (See the Appendix for further discussion on trip rates and calculations.) Specified in Idaho Code 67-8207(2), local governments must consider historical, available, and alternative sources of funding for system improvements. Currently,there are no dedicated revenues being collected by the County to fund growth-related projects for jail facilities. Furthermore, the maximum supportable impact fees are constructed to offset all growth-related capital costs for jail facilities. Evidence is given in this chapter that the projected capital costs from new development will be entirely offset by the development impact fees. Thus, no general tax dollars are assumed to be used to fund growth-related capital costs, requiring no further revenue credits. 11 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study COST ALLOCATION FOR JAIL INFRASTRUCTURE Both residential and nonresidential development increases the demand for jail services and facilities. To calculate the proportional share between residential and nonresidential demand calls for service data from the Ada County Sheriff is analyzed.This call report represents the need for law enforcement services throughout Ada County including calls to which City police departments responded. Shown at the top of Figure 88, 32 percent of calls are to residential locations, 12 percent to nonresidential locations, and 56 percent are classified as traffic calls. Base year vehicle trips are used to assign traffic calls to residential and nonresidential land uses. This results in 41,125 additional residential calls (1,138,874 residential vehicle trips/ 2,087,130 total vehicle trips x 75,367 traffic calls for service) and 34,242 additional nonresidential calls (948,256 nonresidential vehicle trips/2,087,130 total vehicle trips x 75,367 traffic calls for service). After this adjustment, 63 percent of calls are attributed to residential development and 37 percent are attributed to nonresidential development.These percentages are used to attribute facilities to respective demand units. Figure 8. Countywide Law Enforcement Calls for Service M- - - - - Residential 42,779 32% Nonresidential 15,958 12% Traffic 75,367 56% Total 134,105 100% Vehicle Land Use Trips %of Total Residential 1,138,874 55% Nonresidential 948,256 45% Total 2,087,130 100% Adj.Calls Land Use for Service %of Total Residential 83,905 Nonresidential 50,200 Total 134,105 100% Source:Ada County Sheriff's Office 12 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study JAIL LEVEL OF SERVICE AND COST ANALYSIS The following section details the level of service calculations and capital cost per person for each infrastructure category. JAIL CAPACITY ANALYSIS Shown in Figure 99 is an analysis of the Ada County share of square footage and jail beds.The Ada County Jail houses inmates awaiting transfer to the Idaho State Prison and pretrial hearings. Of the 200 currently held for these reasons, 10 of them are from outside of Ada County.These 10 out-of-county prisoners are then divided by the operational capacity of the jail to get the out of county utilization of 1 percent (10 out-of-county inmates/949 operational capacity= 1 percent out-of-county utilization). Figure 9.Ada County Jail Capacity Analysis Ada County Jail Jail Operational Capacity 949 County Inmates Awaiting Transfer/Hearing 200 Portion of Awaiting Inmates Out-of-County(5%) 10 Portion of Jail Capacity Out-of-County 1% JAIL ANCILLARY FACILITIES Listed in Figure 1010, there is a total of 87,956 square feet of ancillary facilities at the county jail, 87,710 square feet being attributed to Ada County demand (99 percent). The proportionate share between residential and nonresidential demand of the facilities is found by applying the calls for service data percentages. As a result, 54,877 square feet are attributed to residential demand and 32,833 square feet are attributed to nonresidential demand.The current level of service is found by comparing the attributed square footage to the base year population and nonresidential vehicles trips. As a result, there is 100.8 square feet per 1,000 residents and 34.6 square feet per 1,000 vehicles trips. The average cost per square foot is combined with the current levels of service to find the capital cost per demand unit.This results in a cost of$76 per person and $26 per vehicle trip(100.8 square feet per 1,000 persons x$755 per square foot= $76 per person, rounded). 13 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 10.Jail Facility Level of Service&Cost Analysis Total Ada County Ada County Facility Square Feet � Portion 99% � Replacement Cost Medical Unit 24,607 24,361 $20,010,220 Work Release 12,980 12,980 $5,612,125 Juvenile Detention 49,012 49,012 $40,258,763 ASCO Vehicle Maintenance 1,357 1,357 $366,634 Total 87,956 87,710 $66,247,743 Level-of-Service Standards Residential Nonres Proportional Share 63% 37% Share of Square Feet 54,877 32,833 2023 Population/Nonres.Vehicle Trips 544,590 948,256 ��Square Feet per � Cost Analysis Residential Nonres Square Feet per 1,000 Persons/Vehicle Trips 100.8 34.6 Average Cost per Square Foot $755 $755 Capital Cost per Person/Vehicle Trip 1 $761 $26 Source:Ada County Sheriff's Office JAIL BEDS Listed in Figure 61, the jail operational capacity is 949 occupied beds, 940 of which are utilized by Ada County(99 percent).The proportionate share between residential and nonresidential demand of the beds is found by applying the calls for service data percentages. As a result, 588 beds are attributed to residential demand and 352 beds are attributed to nonresidential demand.The current level of service is found by comparing the attributed beds to the base year population and nonresidential vehicles trips. As a result, there are 1.08 beds per 1,000 residents and 0.37 beds per 1,000 vehicles trips. The average cost per bed is combined with the current levels of service to find the capital cost per demand unit. This results in a cost of $121 per person and $41 per vehicle trip (1.08 beds per 1,000 persons x $112,000 per bed = $121 per person, rounded). 14 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 61.Jail Bed Level of Service&Cost Analysis Operational CapacityFacility Ja i I 9491 100%1 940 $105,280,000 Total 949 940 $105,280,000 Level-of-Service Standards Residential Nonres Proportional Share 63% 37% Share of Beds 588 352 2023 Population/Nonres.Vehicle Trips 544,590 948,256 Beds per 000 0: Cost Analysis Residential Nonres Beds per 1,000 Persons/Vehicle Trips 1 1.081 0.37 Average Cost per Bed [2] 1 $112,0001 $112,000 Capital Cost per Person/Vehicle Trip 1 $1211 $41 [1]Jail population model forcasts 100%utilization by the beginning of 2024 [2] Based on Pod E expansion of 294 beds at$32,843,108 including contingencies and FFE SHARE OF THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY Under the Idaho enabling legislation, Ada County is able to recover the cost of the study through the collection of future fees. The total cost of the study has been evenly attributed to the four infrastructure categories, resulting in the Jail category share being $16,370. An impact fee study must be completed every five years, so the attributed cost is compared to the five-year projected increase. As a result, the cost per person is$0.13 and the cost per vehicle trip is $0.11. Figure 72.Jail Share of the Development Impact Fee Study Share of Residential Nonresidential Study Cost Share Share $16,370 63% 1 37% Residential Five-Year Capital Cost 11 Growth Co! Population ncrease per Person $10,242 79,401 Nonresidential Five-Year Capital Cost Growth Cost Vehicle Tr ip Increase per Vehicle Trip $6,128 56,847 15 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study JAIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO SERVE GROWTH Needs due to future growth were calculated using the levels of service and cost factors for the infrastructure components. Growth-related needs are a projection of the amount of infrastructure and estimated costs over the next ten years needed to maintain levels of service. JAIL ANCILLARY FACILITIES The current levels of service are combined with the population and vehicle trip projections to illustrate the need for new jail ancillary facilities. Shown in Figure 83, over the next ten years, there is a need for 16,555 square feet.The average cost per square foot is multiplied by the need to find the projected capital need from growth ($12,449,025). Figure 83. Projected Demand for Jail Ancillary Facilities Infrastructure I Level of Service Cost/Unit And Ilary Jai I Residential 100.8 per 1,000 persons Square Feet $755 Facilities Nonresidential 34.6 per 1,000veh.trips Growth-Related Need for Ancillary Jail Facilities Year Population Nonres. Residential Nonresidential Total I- Vehicle Trips Square Feet Square FE Square Feet Base 2023 544,590 948,256 54,894 32,809 87,703 Yea r 1 2024 568,015 959,629 57,255 33,203 90,458 Year 2 2025 591,946 971,000 59,668 33,596 93,264 Year 3 2026 602,628 982,369 60,744 33,989 94,733 Year 4 2027 613,310 993,737 61,821 34,383 96,204 Year 5 2028 623,991 1,005,103 62,898 34,776 97,674 Year 6 2029 634,673 1,016,467 63,975 35,169 99,144 Year 7 2030 645,355 1,027,830 65,051 35,562 100,613 Year 8 2031 653,566 1,039,020 65,879 35,950 101,829 Year 9 2032 661,776 1,050,206 66,707 36,337 103,044 Year 10 2033 669,987 1,061,389 67,534 36,724 104,258 Ten-Year Increase 125,397 113,134 12,640 3,915 16,555 Projected Expenditure $9,543,200 $2,955,825 $12,499,025 Growth-Related Expenditures for Ancillary Jail Facilities $12,499,025 16 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study JAIL BEDS The current levels of service are combined with the population and vehicle trip projections to illustrate the need for new jail beds. Shown in Figure 94, over the next ten years,there is a need for 178 beds.The average cost per unit is multiplied by the need to find the projected capital need from growth ($19,936,000). Figure 94. Projected Demand for Jail Beds Infrastructure I Level of Service Cost/Unit Jail Facilities Residential 1.08 Beds per 1,000 persons Nonres i denti a 1 0.37 per 1,000 veh.trips $112,000 Growth-Related Need for Jail Facilities Year Population Nonres. Residential Nonresidential Total Beds Beds Beds Base 2023 544,590 948,256 588 351 939 Year 1 2024 568,015 959,629 613 355 968 Year 2 2025 591,946 971,000 639 359 998 Year 3 2026 602,628 982,369 651 363 1,014 Year 4 2027 613,310 993,737 662 368 1,030 Year 5 2028 623,991 1,005,103 674 372 1,046 Year 6 2029 634,673 1,016,467 685 376 1,061 Year 7 2030 645,355 1,027,830 697 380 1,077 Year 8 2031 653,566 1,039,020 706 384 1,090 Year 9 2032 661,776 1,050,206 715 389 1,104 Year 10 2033 669,987 1,061,389 724 393 1,117 Ten-Year Increase 125,397 113,134 136 42 178 Projected Expenditure $15,232,000 $4,704,000 $19,936,000 Growth-Related Expenditures for Jail Facilities $19,936,000 17 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study JAIL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CREDIT ANALYSIS Currently,there are no dedicated revenues being collected by the County to fund growth-related projects for jail facilities. Furthermore, the maximum supportable impact fees are constructed to offset growth- related capital costs for facilities. Evidence is given in this chapter that the projected capital costs from new development will be entirely offset by the development impact fees. As a result, no revenue credit is necessary in the impact fee calculation. JAIL INPUT VARIABLES AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Figure 105 provides a summary of the input variables (described in the chapter sections above) used to calculate the net cost per person and vehicle trip. The residential Jail Development Impact Fees are the product of persons per housing unit by type of dwelling unit multiplied by the total net capital cost per person.The nonresidential fees are the product of trips per 1,000 square feet multiplied by the net capital cost per nonresidential vehicle trip. The fees represent the highest supportable amount for each type of applicable land use and represents new growth's fair share of the cost for capital facilities. The County may adopt fees that are less than the amounts shown. However, a reduction in impact fee revenue will necessitate an increase in other revenues, a decrease in planned capital expenditures, and/or a decrease in levels of service. Figure 105.Jail Input Variables and Maximum Supportable Impact Fees ComponentFee Cost Cost , Jai I Beds $121.00 $41.00 Jail Ancillary Facilities $76.00 $26.00 Impact Fee Study $0.13 $0.11 Gross Total $197.13 $67.11 Net Total $197.13 $67.11 Residential SupportablePersons per Maximum Housing Type H Residential(per housing unit) Single Family 2.62 Multifamily 1.81 AMi Nonresidential DevelopmentVehicle Trips Maximum ... Nonresidential(per 1,000 square feet) Reta i 1 14.06 . Off ce 5.42 Industrial 2.44 Institutional 5.39 18 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS FOR JAIL MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE IMPACT FEE This section summarizes the potential cash flow to Ada County if the Jail Development Impact Fee is implemented at the maximum supportable amounts. The cash flow projections are based on the assumptions detailed in this chapter and the development projections discussed in Appendix B. Shown at the bottom of Figure 16, the maximum supportable jail impact fee is estimated to generate $32.2 million in revenue while there is a growth-related cost of$32.4 million. Thus, the impact fees are able to offset all growth-related capital costs (note: the difference is the result of rounding in the calculations). The impact fee revenue is compared to the total Jail CIP to illustrate the non-impact fee funding needed to complete the plan. Importantly,the level of service has included demand from within the cities of Ada County.To ensure that the County captures the full potential revenue of the impact fees an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) is necessary for the Cities to collect the County impact fees on its behalf. Those revenues would be remitted to the County periodically. In the case there are no IGAs, the County will collect $3.1 million in the unincorporated areas (9.4 percent of the countywide growth-related capital costs). Figure 116. Projected Revenue for Jail Impact Fees Infrastructure Costs for Jail Facilities Total Cost Growth Cost Jail Beds $32,843,108 $19,936,000 Jail Ancillary Facilities $21,047,395 $12,499,025 Impact Fee Study $32,740 $32,740 Total Expenditures $53,923,243 $32,467,765 Projected Development Impact Fee Revenue OfficeSingle Family Multifamily Retail per uni per uni per KSF per KSF per KSF per KSF Year Housing Units Housing Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2023 182,342 37,833 41,938 21,670 41,668 25,911 1 2024 190,171 39,417 42,327 22,392 42,078 26,096 2 2025 198,180 41,005 42,715 23,114 42,487 26,281 3 2026 201,750 41,716 43,104 23,836 42,896 26,467 4 2027 205,321 42,426 43,492 24,558 43,305 26,652 5 2028 208,891 43,137 43,880 25,280 43,715 26,838 6 2029 212,462 43,847 44,268 26,002 44,124 27,023 7 2030 216,033 44,558 44,656 26,724 44,533 27,209 8 2031 218,774 45,110 45,037 27,434 44,936 27,392 9 2032 221,515 45,662 45,419 28,145 45,339 27,576 10 2033 224,256 46,215 45,800 28,856 45,741 27,760 Ten-Year Increase 41,914 8,382 3,862 7,186 4,073 1,849 Projected Revenue $21,627,749 $2,992,275 $3,645,458 $2,615,726 $663,897 $667,499 Projected Revenue=> $32,213,000 Projected Expenditures=> $53,923,243 Non-Impact Fee Funding=> $21,710,243 19 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study PROPORTIONATESHARE ANALYSIS Development impact fees for Ada County are based on reasonable and fair formulas or methods. The fees do not exceed a proportionate share of the costs incurred or to be incurred by the County in the provision of system improvements to serve new development.The County will fund non-growth-related improvements with non-development impact fee funds as it has in the past. Specified in the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act(Idaho Code 67-8207),several factors must be evaluated in the development impact fee study and are discussed below. 1) The development impact fees for Ada County are based on new growth's share of the costs of previously built projects along with planned public facilities as provided by Ada County. Projects are included in the County's capital improvements plan and will be included in annual capital budgets. 2) TischlerBise estimated development impact fee revenue based on the maximum supportable development impact fees for the one, countywide service area; results are shown in the cash flow analyses in this report. Development impact fee revenue will entirely fund growth-related improvements less funding from other sources (i.e.,federal and state grants). 3) TischlerBise has evaluated the extent to which new development may contribute to the cost of public facilities. 4) The relative extent to which properties will make future contributions to the cost of existing public facilities has also been evaluated in regards to existing debt. Outstanding debt for growth's portion of already constructed facilities will be paid from development impact fee revenue, therefore a future revenue credit is not necessary. 5) The County will evaluate the extent to which newly developed properties are entitled to a credit for system improvements that have been provided by property owners or developers.These"site- specific"credits will be available for system improvements identified in the annual capital budget and long-term Capital Improvements Plans. Administrative procedures for site-specific credits should be addressed in the development impact fee ordinance. 6) Extraordinary costs, if any, in servicing newly developed properties should be addressed through administrative procedures that allow independent studies to be submitted to the County. These procedures should be addressed in the development impact fee ordinance. One service area represented by Ada County is appropriate for the fees herein. 7) The time-price differential inherent in fair comparisons of amounts paid at different times has been addressed. All costs in the development impact fee calculations are given in current dollars with no assumed inflation rate overtime. Necessary cost adjustments can be made as part of the annual evaluation and update of development impact fees. 20 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study IMPLEMENTATIONADMINISTRATION The Idaho Act requires jurisdictions to form a Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee. The committee must have at least five members with a minimum of two members active in the business of real estate, building, or development. The committee acts in an advisory capacity and is tasked to do the following: • Assist the governmental entity in adopting land use assumptions; • Review the capital improvements plan, and proposed amendments, and file written comments; • Monitor and evaluate implementation of the capital improvements plan; • File periodic reports, at least annually, with respect to the capital improvements plan and report to the governmental entity any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the development impact fees; and • Advise the governmental entity of the need to update or revise land use assumptions,the capital improvements plan, and development impact fees. Per the above, the County formed a Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee (DIFAC). TischlerBise and County Staff met with the DIFAC during the process and provided information on land use assumptions, level of service and cost assumptions, and draft development impact fee schedules. This report reflects comments and feedback received from the DIFAC. The County must develop and adopt a capital improvements plan (CIP)that includes those improvements for which fees were developed.The Idaho Act defines a capital improvement as an "improvement with a useful life of ten years or more, by new construction or other action, which increases the service capacity of a public facility." Requirements for the CIP are outlined in Idaho Code 67-8208. Certain procedural requirements must be followed for adoption of the CIP and the development impact fee ordinance. Requirements are described in detail in Idaho Code 67-8206. The County has a CIP that meets the above requirements. TischlerBise recommends that development impact fees be updated annually to reflect recent data. One approach is to adjust for inflation in construction costs by means of an index like the RSMeans or Engineering News Record (ENR).This index can be applied against the calculated development impact fee. If cost estimates change significantly the County should evaluate an adjustment to the CIP and development impact fees. Idaho's enabling legislation requires an annual development impact fees report that accounts for fees collected and spent during the preceding year (Idaho Code 67-8210). Development impact fees must be deposited in interest-bearing accounts earmarked for the associated capital facilities as outlined in capital improvements plans. Also, fees must be spent within eight years of when they are collected (on a first in, first out basis) unless the local governmental entity identifies in writing (a) a reasonable cause why the 21 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study fees should be held longer than eight years;and (b)an anticipated date by which the fees will be expended but in no event greater than eleven years from the date they were collected. Credits must be provided for in accordance with Idaho Code Section 67-8209 regarding site-specific credits or developer reimbursements for system improvements that have been included in the development impact fee calculations. Project improvements normally required as part of the development approval process are not eligible for credits against development impact fees. Specific policies and procedures related to site-specific credits or developer reimbursements for system improvements should be addressed in the ordinance that establishes the County's fees. The general concept is that developers may be eligible for site-specific credits or reimbursements only if they provide system improvements that have been included in CIP and development impact fee calculations. If a developer constructs a system improvement that was included in the fee calculations, it is necessary to either reimburse the developer or provide a credit against the fees in the area that benefits from the system improvement.The latter option is more difficult to administer because it creates unique fees for specific geographic areas. Based on TischlerBise's experience, it is better for a reimbursement agreement to be established with the developer that constructs a system improvement. For example, if a developer elects to construct a system improvement, then a reimbursement agreement can be established to payback the developer from future development impact fee revenue. The reimbursement agreement should be based on the actual documented cost of the system improvement, if less than the amount shown in the CIP. However,the reimbursement should not exceed the CIP amount that has been used in the development impact fee calculations. 22 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study APPENDixA. LAND USE DEFINITIONS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT As discussed below, residential development categories are based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey. Ada County will collect impact fees from all new residential units. One-time impact fees are determined by the number of residential units. Single Family Units: 1. Single family detached is a one-unit structure detached from any other house, that is, with open space on all four sides. Such structures are considered detached even if they have an adjoining shed or garage.A one-family house that contains a business is considered detached as long as the building has open space on all four sides. 2. Single family attached (townhouse) is a one-unit structure that has one or more walls extending from ground to roof separating it from adjoining structures. In row houses (sometimes called townhouses), double houses, or houses attached to nonresidential structures, each house is a separate, attached structure if the dividing or common wall goes from ground to roof. 3. Mobile home includes both occupied and vacant mobile homes, to which no permanent rooms have been added. Mobile homes used only for business purposes or for extra sleeping space and mobile homes for sale on a dealer's lot,at the factory,or in storage are not counted in the housing inventory. Multifamily Units: 1. 2+ units (duplexes and apartments) are units in structures containing two or more housing units, further categorized as units in structures with "2, 3 or 4, 5 to 9, 10 to 19, 20 to 49, and 50 or more apartments." 2. Boat, RV, Van, etc. includes any living quarters occupied as a housing unit that does not fit the other categories(e.g.,houseboats, railroad cars,campers,and vans). Recreational vehicles, boats, vans, railroad cars, and the like are included only if they are occupied as a current place of residence. 23 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CATEGORIES Nonresidential development categories used throughout this study are based on land use classifications from the book Trip Generation (ITE, 2021). A summary description of each development category is provided below. Retail: Establishments primarily selling merchandise, eating/drinking places, and entertainment uses. By way of example, Retail includes shopping centers, supermarkets, pharmacies, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, automobile dealerships, and movie theaters. Office: Establishments providing management, administrative, professional, or business services. By way of example, Office includes business offices, office parks, and corporate headquarters. Industrial: Establishments primarily engaged in the production and transportation of goods. By way of example, Industrial includes manufacturing plants, trucking companies, warehousing facilities, utility substations, power generation facilities, and telecommunications buildings. Institutional: Public and quasi-public buildings providing educational, social assistance, or religious services. By way of example, Institutional includes schools, universities, churches, daycare facilities, hospitals, health care facilities, and government buildings. 24 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study APPENDixB. DEMOGRAPHICASSUMPTIONS The data estimates and projections used in the study's calculations are detailed in this section. This chapter includes discussion and findings on: • Household/housing unit size • Current population and housing unit estimates • Residential projections • Current employment and nonresidential floor area estimates • Nonresidential projections • Functional population • Vehicle trip generation and projections POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS Impact fees often use per capita standards and persons per housing unit or persons per household to derive proportionate share fee amounts. Housing types have varying household sizes and, consequently, a varying demand on County infrastructure and services. Thus, it is important to differentiate between housing types and size. When persons per housing unit(PPHU) is used in the development impact fee calculations, infrastructure standards are derived using year-round population. In contrast, when persons per household (PPHH) is used in the development impact fee calculations, the fee methodology assumes all housing units will be occupied, thus requiring seasonal or peak population to be used when deriving infrastructure standards. Thus,TischlerBise recommends that fees for residential development in Ada County be imposed according to persons per housing units. Based on housing characteristics, TischlerBise recommends using two housing unit categories for the Impact Fee study: (1) Single Family and (2) Multifamily. Each housing type has different characteristics which results in a different demand on County facilities and services. Figure 127 shows the US Census American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimates data for Ada County. Single family units have a housing unit size of 2.62 persons and multifamily units have a housing unit size of 1.81 persons. Additionally,there is a housing mix of 83 percent single family and 17 percent multifamily. The estimates in Figure 127 are for household size calculations. Base year population and housing units are estimated with another, more recent data source. TischlerBise 25 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 127.Ada County Persons per Housing Unit Housing Housing Type Persons Units . . . . Single Family[1] 415,557 158,890 153,711 2.70 83% Multifamily[2] 59,917 33,161 31,014 1.93 17% Total 475,474 192,051 184,725 2.57 [1] Includes attached and detached single family homes and mobile homes [2] Includes all other types Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates The US Census American Community Survey 2021 5-Year Estimates data for incorporated Ada County is shown in Figure 138. Single family units have a housing unit size of 2.59 persons and multifamily units have a housing unit size of 1.80 persons. Additionally, there is a housing mix of 81 percent single family and 19 percent multifamily. Figure 138. Incorporated Ada County Persons per Housing Unit Housing HousingType Units . . . . Single Family[1] 363,946 140,266 135,502 2.69 81% Multifamily[2] 58,871 32,691 30,619 1.92 19% Total 422,817 172,957 166,121 2.55 [1] Includes attached and detached single family homes and mobile homes [2] Includes all other types Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates The US Census American Community Survey 2021 5-Year-Estimates data for unincorporated Ada County is shown in Figure 149. Single family units have a housing unit size of 2.77 persons and multifamily units have a housing unit size of 2.23 persons. Additionally, there is a housing mix of 98 percent single family and 2 percent multifamily. Figure 149. Unincorporated Ada County Persons per Housing Unit Housing Housing Type Units . . . . Single Family[1] 51,611 18,624 18,209 2.83 98% Multifamily[2] 1,046 470 395 2.65 2% Total 52,657 L 19,094 18,604 2.83 [1] Includes attached and detached single family homes and mobile homes [2] Includes all other types Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates BASE YEAR POPULATION AND HOUSING UNITS Available through the Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS), the base year 2023 population in Ada County is estimated to be 554,590 residents shown in Figure20. PPHU factors for Tischl rBise 26 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Incorporated and Unincorporated Ada County were used to estimate base year housing units for the whole County. The housing unit mix for Ada County was then applied to the total giving an estimated 182,342 single family units and 37,833 multifamily units. Figure 20.Ada County Base Year Population and Housing Units Base Year Population [1] 544,590 Housing Units [2] Single Family 182,342 Multifamily 37,833 Total Housing Units 220,175 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model [2] U.S.Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, TischlerBise analysis Available through COMPASS, the base year 2023 population in unincorporated Ada County is estimated to be 63,510 residents shown in Figure 151. PPHU factors for unincorporated Ada County were used to estimate base year housing units.The housing unit mix was then applied to the total giving an estimated 22,444 single family units and 566 multifamily units. Figure 151. Unincorporated Ada County Base Year Population and Housing Units Ada County Base Year Unini .. 2023 Population [1] 63,510 Housing Units[2] Single Family 22,444 Multifamily 566 Total Housing Units 23,011 [1]COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model [2] U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, TischlerBise analysis The population estimate for unincorporated Ada County from COMPASS was subtracted from the population estimate for the whole of Ada County to find the estimated base year population for incorporated Ada County. Shown in Figure 162 the estimated population is 481,080. PPHU factors for incorporated Ada County were used to estimate base year housing units. The housing unit mix was then applied to the total giving an estimated 159,898 single family units and 37,266 multifamily units. T[schl raise 27 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Figure 162. Incorporated Ada County Base Year Population and Housing Units Ada County Base Year Incorporated i Population [1] 481, 880 Housing Units [21 Single Family 159,898 Multifamily 37,266 Total Housing Units 197,164 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model [2] U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, TischlerBise analysis T[schlerBise 28 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study POPULATION AND HOUSING UNIT PROJECTIONS The residential projections are based on a review of COMPASS published estimates, impact fee studies from cities and fire districts within Ada County, and PPHU factors. Impact fee studies comprising the main six cities within Ada County were used to affirm growth trends for whole county projections. From the 2023 base year housing unit totals, Ada County is projected to increase by 50,296 housing units over the next ten years. Additionally,there is a projected increase of 125,397 residents over the next ten years, a 23 percent increase. Figure 173.Ada County Residential Development Projections Base Year Total Population 1 544,5901 568,015 591,946 602,628 613,310 623,991 634,673 645,355 653,566 661,776 669,987 125,397 Percent Increase 4.3% 4.2% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 23.0% Housing Units Single Family 182,342 190,171 198,180 201,750 205,321 208,891 212,462 216,033 218,774 221,515 224,256 41,914 Multifamily 37,833 39,417 41,005 41,716 42,426 43,137 43,847 44,558 45,110 45,662 46,215 8,382 Total Housing Units 220,175 229,588 239,185 243,466 247,747 252,028 256,309 260,591 263,884 267,177 270,471 50,296 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; TischlerBise analysis From the 2023 base year housing unit totals for incorporated Ada County,there is a projected increase of 44,844 new housing units over the next ten years.Additionally, there is a projected increase of 110,415 residents in incorporated Ada County, a 23 percent increase. Figure 184. Incorporated Ada County Residential Development Projections Ada County Base Year I Total Population 1 481,0801 502,024 523,414 532,767 542,119 551,471 560,823 570,174 577,281 584,388 591,495 110,415 Percent Increase 4.4% 4.3% 1.8% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 23.0% Housing Units Si ngl a Fa mi ly 159,898 166,853 173,967 177,075 180,183 183,291 186,399 189,507 191,866 194,226 196,586 36,688 Multifamily 37,266 38,822 40,383 41,072 41,761 42,450 43,139 43,828 44,359 44,891 45,423 8,156 Total Housing Units 197,164 205,676 214,350 218,147 221,944 225,741 229,538 233,334 236,226 239,117 242,008 44,844 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; TischlerBise analysis TischlerBise 29 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study From the 2023 base year housing unit total for unincorporated Ada County, there is a projected increase 5,453 new housing units over the next ten years.Additionally, there is a projected increase of 14,982 residents in unincorporated Ada County, a 23.6 percent increase. Figure 195. Unincorporated Ada County Residential Development Projections Ada County Base Year I Total Population 1 63,5101 65,991 68,532 69,861 71,190 72,520 73,850 75,181 76,284 77,388 78,492 14,982 Percent Increase 3.9% 3.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 23.6% Housing Units Si ngl a Fa mi ly 22,444 23,318 24,213 24,675 25,138 25,600 26,063 26,526 26,908 27,289 27,671 5,227 Multifamily 566 594 622 644 665 687 708 730 751 771 792 226 Total Housing Units 23,011 23,912 24,835 25,319 25,803 26,287 26,772 27,256 27,658 28,061 28,464 5,453 Source:COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;City& Fire District Impact Fee Studies; TischlerBise analysis TischlerBise 30 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study CURRENT EMPLOYMENT AND NONRESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA The impact fee study will include nonresidential development as well. Available through COMPASS Job projections from the Traffic Analysis Zone Model (TAZ) and Communities in Motion 2050 there are an estimated 239,668 jobs in Ada County in 2023.These job projections are broken down by industry leading to an estimated 43,787 retail jobs, 130,780 office jobs,35,745 industrial jobs,and 29,356 institutional jobs in the base year. Base year nonresidential floor area estimates are based on Ada County GIS nonresidential parcel data. There is an estimated 131 million square feet of nonresidential floor area in Ada County. Retail and industrial sectors account for the greatest share with approximately 32 percent each. Institutional accounts for 20 percent, and office accounts for 17 percent of the total. Figure 206.Ada County Base Year Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Base Year %of Base Year %of Jobs[1] Total Sq.Ft.[2) Total Retail 43,787 18% 41,938,153 32% Office 130,780 55% 21,670,098 17% Industrial 35,745 15% 41,668,221 32% Institutional 29,356 12% 25,911,213 20% Total 239,668 100% 131,187,685 100% [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050 [2] Source:Ada County GIS parcel data The job and nonresidential floor area estimates were further broken down into incorporated and unincorporated areas. Incorporated Ada County has an estimated 230,704 jobs in 2023. These job projections are broken down by industry leading to an estimated 42,925 retail jobs, 125,936 office jobs, 34,547 industrial jobs, and 27,296 institutional jobs in the base year. Additionally, there is an estimated 127 million square feet of nonresidential floor area in incorporated Ada County. Retail accounts for the greatest share at 32 percent. Industrial accounts for 31 percent, institutional accounts for 19 percent,and office accounts for 17 percent of the total. Figure 217. Incorporated Ada County Base Year Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Base Year %of Base Year %of •• . .• Jobs[1] Total Sq.Ft. [2] Total Retail 42,925 19% 41,286,649 32% Office 125,936 55% 21,370,261 17% Industrial 34,547 15% 39,887,518 31% Institutional 27,296 12% 24,605,169 19% Total 230,704 100% 127,149,597 100% [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050 [2] Source:Ada County GIS parcel data Tisch Bise 31 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Unincorporated Ada County has an estimated 8,964 jobs in 2023. These job projections are broken down by industry leading to an estimated 862 retail jobs, 4,844 office jobs, 1,198 industrial jobs, and 2,060 institutional jobs in the base year. Additionally, there is an estimated 4 million square feet of nonresidential floor area in unincorporated Ada County. Industrial accounts for the greatest share at 44 percent. Institutional accounts for 32 percent, retail accounts for 16 percent, and office accounts for 7 percent. Figure 228. Unincorporated Ada County Base Year Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area 7Retail Base Year %of Base Year %of Jobs[11 Total Sq. Ft. [2] Total 862 10% 651,504 16% 4,844 54% 299,837 7% 1,198 13% 1,780,703 44% Institutional 2,060 23% 1,306,044 32% Total 8,964 100% 4,038,088 100% [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion [2] Source:Ada County GIS parcel data EMPLOYMENT AND NONRESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA PROJECTIONS Job projections for the industry sectors are calculated with the Institution of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) square feet per employee averages shown in Figure 239. For retail industries the Shopping Center land use factors are used; for office the General Office factors are used; for industrial the Light Industrial factors are used; for institutional the Hospital factors are used. Figure 239. Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE) Employment Density Factors Employment • . . - Industry .. Retail 820 1 Shopping Center 1,000 Sq Ft 2.12 471 Office 710 General Office 1,000 Sq Ft 3.26 307 Industrial 110 Light Industrial 1,000 Sq Ft 1.57 637 Institutional 610 Hospital 1,000 Sq Ft 2.86 350 Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition (2021) T[schlerBise 32 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Job and nonresidential growth projections over the next ten years for Ada County are shown in Figure 30. It is estimated there will be an increase of 43,283 jobs, an 18 percent increase from the base year.The majority of the increase comes from the office sector(54 percent). The nonresidential floor area projections are calculated by applying the ITE square feet per employee factors to the job growth. In the next ten years, the nonresidential floor area is projected to increase by 17 million square feet (rounded), a 13 percent increase from the base year. The office sector has the largest share of this growth at 42 percent. Figure 30.Ada County Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections Base Year Total Jobs[l] Retail 43,787 44,612 45,437 46,262 47,086 47,910 48,734 49,557 50,367 51,177 51,986 8,199 Office 130,780 133,132 135,483 137,835 140,186 142,538 144,889 147,241 149,556 151,872 154,187 23,407 Industrial 35,745 36,388 37,030 37,673 38,315 38,958 39,600 40,242 40,875 41,507 42,139 6,394 Institutional 29,356 29,884 30,413 30,943 31,472 32,003 32,533 33,064 33,588 34,113 34,639 5,283 Total 1 239,6681 244,016 248,364 252,712 257,060 261,408 265,756 270,104 274,386 278,669 282,951 43,283 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 41,938 42,327 42,715 43,104 43,492 43,880 44,268 44,656 45,037 45,419 45,800 3,862 Office 21,670 22,392 23,114 23,836 24,558 25,280 26,002 26,724 27,434 28,145 28,856 7,186 Industrial 41,668 42,078 42,487 42,896 43,305 43,715 44,124 44,533 44,936 45,339 45,741 4,073 Institutional 25,911 26,096 26,281 26,467 26,652 26,838 27,023 27,209 27,392 27,576 27,760 1,849 Total 131,1881 132,893 134,598 136,302 138,007 139,712 141,417 143,121 144,800 146,479 148,1571 16,970 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [2]Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 Tisch B S@ 33 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Job and nonresidential growth projections over the next ten years for incorporated Ada County are shown in Figure 241. It is estimated there will be an increase of 41,040 jobs, an 18 percent increase from the base year.The majority of the increase comes from the office sector(55 percent). The nonresidential floor area projections are calculated by applying the ITE square feet per employee factors to the job growth. In the next ten years, the nonresidential floor area is projected to increase by 16.1 million square feet (rounded), a 13 percent increase from the base year. The office sector has the largest share of this growth at 43 percent. Figure 241. Incorporated Ada County Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections IncorporatedAda County Base Year � Total Jobs[l] Retail 42,925 43,696 44,466 45,236 46,004 46,772 47,539 48,306 49,059 49,811 50,561 7,636 Office 125,936 128,198 130,458 132,715 134,970 137,223 139,474 141,723 143,933 146,138 148,339 22,403 Industrial 34,547 35,168 35,787 36,407 37,025 37,643 38,261 38,878 39,484 40,089 40,693 6,146 Institutional 27,296 27,786 28,276 28,765 29,254 29,742 30,230 30,718 31,197 31,675 32,152 4,856 Total 1 230,7041 234,848 238,987 243,123 247,254 251,381 255,505 259,624 263,673 267,712 271,744 41,040 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 41,287 41,650 42,013 42,375 42,737 43,099 43,460 43,821 44,176 44,530 44,883 3,597 Office 21,370 22,065 22,758 23,451 24,144 24,835 25,526 26,217 26,895 27,572 28,248 6,878 Industrial 39,888 40,283 40,678 41,072 41,466 41,860 42,253 42,646 43,032 43,418 43,802 3,915 Institutional 24,605 24,777 24,948 25,119 25,291 25,461 25,632 25,803 25,970 26,138 26,305 1,699 Total 1 127,1501 128,774 130,397 132,018 133,637 135,255 136,872 138,487 140,074 141,657 143,2381 16,088 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [2]Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 34 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study Job and nonresidential growth projections over the next ten years for unincorporated Ada County are shown in Figure 252. It is estimated there will be an increase of 2,244jobs, a 25 percent increase from the base year.The majority of the increase comes from the office sector(45 percent). The nonresidential floor area projections are calculated by applying the ITE square feet per employee factors to the job growth. In the next ten years, the nonresidential floor area is projected to increase by 881,000 square feet, a 22 percent increase from the base year. The office sector has the largest share of this growth at 35 percent. Figure 252. Unincorporated Ada County Employment and Nonresidential Floor Area Projections UnincorporatedAda County Base Year Total Jobs[1] Retail 862 916 971 1,026 1,082 1,138 1,194 1,251 1,308 1,366 1,425 563 Office 4,844 4,934 5,025 5,120 5,216 5,315 5,415 5,518 5,623 5,734 5,849 1,005 Industrial 1,198 1,220 1,243 1,266 1,290 1,314 1,339 1,365 1,391 1,418 1,446 248 Institutional 2,060 2,098 2,137 2,177 2,218 2,260 2,303 2,347 2,391 2,438 2,487 427 Total 1 8,9641 9,168 9,377 9,589 9,806 10,027 10,251 10,480 10,714 10,957 11,208 2,244 Nonresidential Floor Area(1,000 sq.ft.)[2] Retail 652 677 703 729 755 781 808 835 862 889 917 265 Office 300 327 356 384 414 444 475 507 539 573 608 308 Industrial 1,781 1,795 1,809 1,824 1,839 1,855 1,871 1,887 1,904 1,921 1,939 158 Institutional 1,306 1,319 1,333 1,347 1,361 1,376 1,391 1,406 1,422 1,438 1,456 150 Total 1 4,0381 4,119 4,201 4,285 4,370 4,457 4,545 4,634 4,726 4,821 4,920 881 [1] COMPASS(Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho)Traffic Analysis Zone Model;Communities in Motion 2050;TischlerBise analysis [2]Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 2021 35 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RESIDENTIAL VEHICLE TRIPS BY HOUSING TYPE A customized trip rate is calculated for the single family and multifamily units in Ada County. In Figure 263, the most recent data from the US Census American Community Survey is inputted into equations provided by the ITE to calculate the trip ends per housing unit factor. A single family unit is estimated to generate 10.66 trip ends and a multifamily unit is estimated to generate 5.42 trip ends on an average weekday. Figure 263. Customized Residential Trip End Rates by Housing Type Households by Structure Type Tenure by Units Vehicles Single Multifamily Total Vehicles per in Structi Available' Family HH by Tenure Owner-Occupied 289,778 129,602 1,468 131,070 2.21 Renter-Occupied 85,906 24,109 29,546 53,655 1.60 Total 375,684 153,711 31,014 184,725 2.03 Housing Units3 158,890 33,161 192,051 HouseholdsPersons in Vehicles by Trip Average Local Trip National Trip Housing Type � per Unit7 Single Family 415,557 1,157,628 324,995 2,118,200 1,637,914 9.43 Multifamily 59,917 137,129 50,518 199,334 168,231 4.54 Total 475,474 1,294,757 375,513 2,317,534 1 1,806,145 1.Vehicles available by tenure from Table B25046,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 2. Households by tenure and units in structure from Table B25032,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 3. Housing units from Table B25024,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 4.Total population in households from Table B25033,2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. 5.Vehicle trips ends based on persons using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2021). For single-family housing(ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.89*LN(persons)+1.72).To approximate the average population of the ITE studies, persons were divided by 19 and the equation result multiplied by 19. For multi-family housing(ITE 221),the fitted curve equation is(2.29*persons)-81.02(ITE 2017). 6.Vehicle trip ends based on vehicles available using formulas from Trip Generation(ITE 2021). For single-family housing (ITE 210),the fitted curve equation is EXP(0.99*LN(vehicles)+1.93).To approximate the average number of vehicles in the ITE studies,vehicles available were divided by 34 and the equation result multiplied by 34. For multi-family housing (ITE 221),the fitted curve equation is(3.94*vehicles)+293.58(ITE 2021). 7.Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition(2021). Tisch Bise 36 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study RESIDENTIAL VEHICLE TRIPS ADJUSTMENT FACTORS A vehicle trip end is the out-bound or in-bound leg of a vehicle trip. As a result, so to not double count trips, a standard 50 percent adjustment is applied to trip ends to calculate a vehicle trip. For example,the out-bound trip from a person's home to work is attributed to the housing unit and the trip from work back home is attributed to the employer. However, an additional adjustment is necessary to capture County residents' work bound trips that are outside of the County. The trip adjustment factor includes two components. According to the National Household Travel Survey, home-based work trips are typically 31 percent of out-bound trips (which are 50 percent of all trip ends). Also, utilizing the most recent data from the Census Bureau's web application "OnTheMap", 17 percent of Ada County workers travel outside the County for work. In combination,these factors account for 3 percent of additional production trips (0.31 x 0.50 x 0.17=0.03). Shown in Figure 4, the total adjustment factor for residential housing units includes attraction trips (50 percent of trip ends) plus the journey-to-work commuting adjustment (3 percent of production trips) for a total of 53 percent. Figure 34. Residential Trip Adjustment Factor for Commuters Trip Adjustment Factor for Commuters Employed Ada County Residents(2020) 212,011 Residents Working in Ada County(2020) 175,359 Residents Commuting Outside of Ada County for Work 36,652 Percent Commuting Out of Ada County 17% Additional Production Trips 3% Standard Trip Adjustment Factor 50% Residential Trip Adjustment Factor 53% Source:U.S.Census,OnTheMap Application,2020 TischlerBise 37 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study NONRESIDENTIAL VEHICLE TRIPS Vehicle trip generation for nonresidential land uses are calculated by using ITE's average daily trip end rates and adjustment factors found in their recently published 11th edition of Trip Generation.To estimate the trip generation in Ada County, the weekday trip end per 1,000 square feet factors listed in Figure 35275 are used. Figure 3527. Institute of Transportation Engineers Nonresidential Factors Employment ITE Demand Wkdy Trip Ends Wkdy Trip Ends Industry Code Land Use Unit per Dmd Unit I per Employee Retail 820 Shop in Center 1,000 Sq Ft 37.01 17.42 Office 710 General Office 1,000 S Ft 10.84 3.33 Industrial 110 L ht Industrial 1,000 S Ft 4.87 3.10 Institutional 610 Hospital 1,000 S Ft 10.77 3.77 Source: Trip Generation,I nstitute of Transportation Engineers,11th Edition(2021) For nonresidential land uses, the standard 50 percent adjustment is applied to office, industrial, and institutional land uses. A lower vehicle trip adjustment factor is used for retail uses because this type of development attracts vehicles as they pass-by on arterial and collector roads. For example, when someone stops at a convenience store on their way home from work, the convenience store is not their primary destination. In Figure 286, the Institute for Transportation Engineers' land use code,daily vehicle trip end rate, and trip adjustment factor is listed for each land use. Figure 286. Daily Vehicle Trip Factors ITE Daily Vehicle Trip Adj. Daily Vehicle CodesLand Use Residential(per housing unit) Single Family 210 10.66 53% 5.65 Multifamily 220 5.42 53% 2.87 Nonresidential (per 1,000 square feet) Retail 820 37.01 38% 14.06 Office 710 10.84 50% 5.42 Industrial 110 4.87 50% 2.44 Institutional 610 10.77 50% 5.39 Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 11th Edition(2021); 'National Household Travel Survey, 2009 Tisch Bise 38 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study VEHICLE TRIP PROJECTIONS The base year vehicle trip totals and vehicle trip projections are calculated by combining the vehicle trip end factors, the trip adjustment factors, and the residential and nonresidential assumptions for housing stock and floor area. Countywide, residential land uses account for 1,138,874 vehicle trips and nonresidential land uses account for 948,256 vehicle trips in the base year shown in Figure 297. Through 2033, it is projected that daily vehicle trips will increase by 374,018 trips with the majority of the growth being generated by single family (63 percent) and retail (15 percent) development. Figure 297.Ada County Vehicle Trip Projections Base Year Total Residential Trips Single Family 1,030:196 1,074,429 1,119,675 1,139,848 1,160,022 1,180,195 1,200,368 1,220,542 1,236,029 1,251,516 1,267,003 236,807 Multifamily 108679 113,228 117,791 119,832 121,873 123,915 125,956 127,997 129,583 131,170 132,756 24,077 Subtotal 1,138,874 1,187,658 1,237,466 1,259,681 1,281,895 1,304,110 1,326,324 1,348,539 1,365,612 1,382,685 1,399,759 260,884 Nonresidential Trips Retail 589,810 595,277 600,742 606,204 611,664 617,121 622,576 628,029 633,398 638,762 644,120 54,310 Office 117,452 121,365 125,278 129,191 133,103 137,016 140,929 144,841 148,694 152,547 156,400 38,948 Industrial 101,462 102,459 103,456 104,452 105,449 106,445 107,442 108,438 109,419 110,399 111,380 9,918 Institutional 139,532 140,528 141,524 142,522 143,521 144,520 145,520 146,521 147,509 148,498 149,489 9,957 Subtotal 948,256 959,629 971,000 982,369 993,737 1,005,103 1,016,467 1,027,830 1,039,020 1,050,206 1,061,389 113,134 Vehicle Trips Grand Total 2,087,130 2,147,286 2,208,466 2,242,050 2,275,632 2,309,212 2,342,791 2,376,368 2,404,632 2,432,892 2,461,148 374,018 Source:Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition (2021) Tischleroise 39 FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study In incorporated Ada County, residential land uses account for 1,010,441 vehicle trips and nonresidential land uses account for 926,099 vehicle trips in the base year shown in Figure 308. Through 2033, it is projected that daily vehicle trips will increase by 337,251 trips with the majority of the growth being generated by single family (61 percent) and retail (15 percent) development. Figure 308. Incorporated Ada County Vehicle Trip Projections Ada County Base Year Total . 2i i24 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Residential Trips Single Family 903,389 942,688 982,879 1,000,440 1,018,000 1,035,559 1,053,117 1,070,675 1,084,006 1,097,336 1,110,670 207,281 Multifamily 107,051 111,521 116,004 117,983 119,963 121,942 123,921 125,899 127,427 128,954 130,481 23,429 Su btota 1 1,010,441 1,054,210 1,098,883 1,118,423 1,137,962 1,157,500 1,177,038 1,196,575 1,211,433 1,226,289 1,241,151 230,710 Nonresidential Trips Retail 580,647 585,754 590,856 595,953 601,044 606,131 611,213 616,291 621,280 626,259 631,228 50,580 Office 115,827 119,591 123,351 127,107 130,859 134,608 138,353 142,095 145,772 149,442 153,103 37,277 Industrial 97,126 98,089 99,050 100,011 100,970 101,929 102,887 103,843 104,784 105,722 106,658 9,532 1 nsti tuti ona 1 132,499 133,423 134,346 135,268 136,189 137,110 138,029 138,948 139,851 140,752 141,651 9,152 Subtotal 926,099 936,857 947,603 958,338 969,063 979,778 990,482 1,001,177 1,011,687 1,022,174 1,032,640 106,541 Vehicle Trips Grand Total 11,936,539 1,991,066 2,046,486 2,076,761 2,107,025 2,137,278 2,167,520 2,197,752 2,223,120 2,248,464 2,273,791 337,251 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation,11th Edition (2021) 40 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Ada County, Idaho 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study In unincorporated Ada County, residential land uses account for 128,434 vehicle trips and nonresidential land uses account for 22,157 vehicle trips in the base year shown in Figure 319. Through 2033, it is projected that daily vehicle trips will increase by 36,772 trips with the majority of the growth being generated by single family (80 percent) and retail (10 percent) development. Figure 319. Unincorporated Ada County Vehicle Trip Projections Ada County Base Year Total Unincorl 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027i 2031 Residential Trips Single Family 126,807 131,741 136,796 139,409 142,022 144,636 147,251 149,866 152,023 154,180 156,338 29,532 Multifamily 1,627 1,707 1,787 1,849 1,911 1,973 2,035 2,097 2,157 2,216 2,275 648 Subtotal 128,434 133,448 138,583 141,258 143,933 146,609 149,286 151,964 154,179 156,396 158,613 30,180 Nonresidential Trips Retail 91163 9,523 9,886 10,251 10,619 10,990 11,363 11,739 12,118 12,503 12,893 3,730 Office 1,625 1,774 1,927 2,084 2,244 2,408 2,575 2,746 2,922 3,106 3,297 1,672 Industrial 4,336 4,370 4,406 4,442 4,479 4,517 4,555 4,594 4,635 4,677 4,721 385 Institutional 7,033 7,105 7,178 7,254 7,331 7,410 7,491 7,573 7,658 7,746 7,838 805 Subtotal 22,157 22,772 23,397 24,031 24,673 25,325 25,985 26,652 27,333 28,032 28,749 6,592 Vehicle Trips Grand Total 150,5911 156,220 161,980 165,288 168,606 171,934 175,271 178,616 181,512 184,428 187,363 36,772 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation,11th Edition (2021) 41 TischlerBise FISCAL I ECONOMIC I PLANNING Exhibit A.8 CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 22-2004 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: BERNT, BORTON, CAVENER, HOAGLUN, PERREAULT, STRADER AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES STUDY; ADOPTING AN AMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN; REPEALING AND REPLACING MERIDIAN CITY CODE SECTION 10-7-12(E)(2) CONCERNING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES; VOIDING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS,AND ORDERS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,pursuant to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, the City of Meridian ("City") has established fire impact fees, police impact fees, and park and recreation impact fees ("Impact Fees") to fund certain public facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and, WHEREAS,the City retained DP Guthrie LLC ("Consultant") to prepare a study to evaluate the need to update the Impact Fees in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act; and, WHEREAS,the Consultant prepared the 2022 Development Impact Fees Study ("Study"), attached hereto as Exhibit A, which includes an amended capital improvements plan ("Capital Improvements Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the Study and amended Capital Improvements Plan fully comply with the requirements set forth in the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act; and, WHEREAS, the City of Meridian Impact Fee Advisory Committee ("Committee"), pursuant to Meridian City Code section 10-7-11, considered the Study, amended Capital Improvements Plan, and updated Impact Fees; and, WHEREAS, the Committee recommended that the City Council accept the Study, adopt the amended Capital Improvements Plan, and implement the updated Impact Fees; and, WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on November 9, 2022, to consider the Study, the amended Capital Improvements Plan, and an ordinance authorizing updates to the Impact Fees; and, WHEREAS,the City Council found that the Study and amended Capital Improvements Plan fully comply with the requirements and processes set forth in the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act; and, WHEREAS,the City Council found that the recommended updates to the Impact Fees fully comply with the requirements and processes set forth in the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act; 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE PAGE I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and incorporated herein as findings of the City Council. Section 2. That the Study is hereby accepted. Section 3. That the amended Capital Improvements Plan, as set forth in the Study, is hereby adopted. Section 4. That Meridian City Code section 10-7-12(E)(2) shall be repealed and replaced in its entirety as follows: 2. Except for such impact fee as may be calculated,paid, and accepted pursuant to an independent impact fee calculation study, the amount of each impact fee shall be as follows. Impact Fee Schedule Effective February 1, 2023 Residential Square Feet of Climate- Park and Police Fire Total Fees Controlled Floor Area Per Recreation Facilities Facilities Individual Dwelling Unit Facilities 1,200 or less $1,946.00 $190.00 $470.00 $2,606.00 1,201 to 1,700 $3,006.00 $294.00 $726.00 $4,026.00 1,701 to 2,500 $4,119.00 $402.00 $995.00 $5,516.00 2,501 to 3,200 $4,935.00 $482.00 $1,192.00 $6,609.00 3,201 or more $5,544.00 $542.00 $1,339.00 $7,425.00 For a building with more than one dwelling unit, the floor area per individual dwelling unit shall be calculated by dividing the total climate-controlled floor area of the building, less ancillary building space,by the total number of dwelling units in the building. Ancillary floor area includes community rooms, fitness centers, management offices, and maintenance areas. 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE PAGE 2 Nonresidential Per Square Foot of Building Park and Recreation Police Fire Total Facilities Facilities Facilities Fees Commercial (includes all $0.00 $1.23 $1.29 $2.52 buildings in a shopping center; all stand-alone retail buildings; and all restaurants and bars) All Other $0.00 $0.19 $0.96 S 1.15 Section 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders, or parts thereof in conflict with this ordinance are hereby voided. Section 6. That the effective date of this ordinance shall be February 1, 2023, which shall be no sooner than thirty(30) days after its adoption and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 22nd day of November , 2022. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 22nd day of November, 2022. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE PAGE 3 STATEMENT OF MERIDIAN CITY ATTORNEY CONCERNING THE SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 22-2004 The undersigned, William L.M.Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and provides adequate notice to the public. DATED this b day ofx -.; 2022. F William L.M.Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 22-2004 An ordinance accepting the 2022 Development Impact Fees Study; adopting an amended capital improvements plan;repealing and replacing Meridian City Code section 10-7-12(E)(2)concerning development impact fees; voiding conflicting ordinances and resolutions; and providing an effective date of February 1, 2023. The full text of the ordinance is available in the City Clerk's Office at Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho. Impact Fee Schedule Effective February 1, 2023 Residential Square Feet of Climate- Park and Police Fire Total Fees Controlled Floor Area Per Recreation Facilities Facilities Individual Dwelling Unit Facilities 1,200 or less $1,946.00 $190.00 $470.00 $2,606.00 1,201 to 1,700 $3,006.00 $294.00 $726.00 $4,026.00 1,701 to 2,500 $4,119.00 $402.00 $995.00 $5,516.00 2,501 to 3,200 $4,935.00 $482.00 $1,192.00 $6,609.00 3,201 or more $5,544.00 $542.00 $1,339.00 $7,425.00 For a building with more than one dwelling unit, the floor area per individual dwelling unit shall be calculated by dividing the total climate-controlled floor area of the building, less ancillary building space, by the total number of dwelling units in the building. Ancillary floor area includes community rooms, fitness centers, management offices, and maintenance areas. 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE PAGE 4 Nonresidential Per Square Foot of Building Park and Recreation Police Fire Total Facilities Facilities Facilities Fees Commercial (includes all $0.00 $1.23 $1.29 $2.52 buildings in a shopping center; all stand-alone retail buildings; and all restaurants and bars) All Other $0.00 $0.19 $0.96 $1.15 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE PAGE 5 EXHIBIT A 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES STUDY 2022 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ORDINANCE PAGE 6 c E IDIAN%---, 4f, 1� RZI !AHO Development Impact Fees Study prepared by DP Guthrie LLC September 16, 2022 September 16, 2022 Mr.Todd Lavoie Chief Financial Officer City of Meridian 33 E Broadway Ave Meridian, Idaho 83642 Subject: Development Impact Fees Report Dear Mr. Lavoie, DP Guthrie LLC is pleased to provide the 2022 development impact fee update for the City of Meridian. After collaborating with staff and receiving input from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,this draft report summarizes key findings and recommendations related to the growth cost of capital improvements to be funded by development impact fees, along with the need for other revenue sources to ensure a financially feasible Comprehensive Financial Plan. It has been a pleasure working with you. Also, I am grateful to City staff for engaging with quality information and insight regarding best practices for the City of Meridian. Sincerely, Dwayne Guthrie, PhD,AICP DP Guthrie LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY.........................................................................................................................................................1 UNIQUE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IDAHO IMPACT FEE ACT.......................................................................................................................1 PROPOSEDIMPACT FEES..................................................................................................................................................................2 PARKS AND RECREATION IMPACT FEES................................................................................................................................4 PARKIMPROVEMENTS.....................................................................................................................................................................4 LANDFOR PARKS............................................................................................................................................................................6 RECREATIONBUILDINGS...................................................................................................................................................................8 REVENUE CREDIT EVALUATION..........................................................................................................................................................9 PROPOSED AND CURRENT IMPACT FEES..............................................................................................................................................9 FORECAST OF REVENUES FOR PARKS AND RECREATION ........................................................................................................................10 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR PARKS AND RECREATION...........................................................................................................11 POLICE IMPACT FEES.......................................................................................................................................................... 12 PROPORTIONATESHARE ................................................................................................................................................................12 EXCLUDEDCOSTS.........................................................................................................................................................................13 CURRENT USE AND AVAILABLE CAPACITY..........................................................................................................................................13 POLICE FACILITIES,SERVICE UNITS,AND STANDARDS...........................................................................................................................13 POLICE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS.....................................................................................................................................................15 REVENUE CREDIT EVALUATION........................................................................................................................................................15 POLICEDEVELOPMENT FEES...........................................................................................................................................................15 PROJECTED REVENUE FOR POLICE FACILITIES......................................................................................................................................17 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR POLICE...................................................................................................................................18 FIREIMPACT FEES.............................................................................................................................................................. 19 EXISTING STANDARDS FOR FIRE FACILITIES.........................................................................................................................................19 FIREINFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS.........................................................................................................................................................21 REVENUE CREDIT EVALUATION........................................................................................................................................................21 CURRENT AND PROPOSED FIRE IMPACT FEES.....................................................................................................................................22 PROJECTED REVENUE FOR FIRE FACILITIES.........................................................................................................................................24 COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FIRE FACILITIES........................................................................................................................25 FEE IMPLEMENTATION AND ADMINISTRATION..................................................................................................................26 COSTOF CFP PREPARATION...........................................................................................................................................................26 DEVELOPMENTCATEGORIES...........................................................................................................................................................26 CREDITS AND REIMBURSEMENTS.....................................................................................................................................................27 APPENDIX A: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS.............................................................................................................................28 SERVICEAREAS............................................................................................................................................................................28 SUMMARY OF GROWTH INDICATORS................................................................................................................................................28 PROPORTIONATESHARE ................................................................................................................................................................29 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PERSONS PER HOUSING UNIT............................................................................................................30 DEMAND INDICATORS BY DWELLING SIZE..........................................................................................................................................31 .LOBS AND NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.......................................................................................................................................34 APPENDIX B: CHANGES IN STANDARDS AND COST FACTORS.............................................................................................36 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Executive Summary Impact fees are one-time payments used to construct system improvements that serve multiple development projects or even the entire jurisdiction. By law, impact fees can only be used for capital improvements, not operating or maintenance costs. Impact fees are subject to legal standards that satisfy three key tests: need, benefit, and proportionality. • First, to justify a fee for public facilities, local government must demonstrate a need for capital improvements. • Second, new development must derive a benefit from the payment of the fees (i.e., in the form of public facilities constructed within a reasonable timeframe). • Third, the fee paid should not exceed a development's proportionate share of the capital cost. As documented in this report,the City of Meridian has complied with applicable legal precedents. Impact fees are proportionate and reasonably related to the capital improvement demands of new development, with the projects identified in this study taken from Meridian's Comprehensive Financial Plan (CFP). Specific costs have been identified using local data and current dollars. With input from City staff, DP Guthrie LLC determined service units for each type of infrastructure and calculated proportionate share factors to allocate costs by type of development. This report documents the formulas and input variables used to calculate the impact fees for each type of public facility. Impact fee methodologies also identify the extent to which new development is entitled to various types of credits to avoid potential double payment of growth-related capital costs. The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act (Idaho Code Title 67 Chapter 82) sets forth "an equitable program for planning and financing public facilities needed to serve new growth." The enabling legislation calls for three integrated products: 1) Land Use Assumptions (LUA)for at least 20 years, 2) Capital Improvements Plan,which the City of Meridian calls Comprehensive Financial Plan (CFP), and 3) Development Impact Fees (DIFs). The LUA(see Appendix A) uses population and housing unit projections provided by City staff. In addition,the CFP and DIF for fire and police facilities require demographic data on nonresidential development. This document includes nonresidential land use assumptions such as jobs and floor area within the City of Meridian, along with service units by residential size thresholds. The CFP and DIF are in the middle section of this report, organized by chapters pertaining to each public facility type (i.e., parks/recreation, police, and fire). Each chapter documents existing infrastructure standards,the projected need for improvements to accommodate new development,the updated DIF compared to current fees, revenue projections and funding strategy for growth-related infrastructure, and a CFP listing specific improvements to be completed by the City of Meridian. Unique Requirements of the Idaho Impact Fee Act The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act has several requirements not common in the enabling legislation of other states. This overview summarizes these unique requirements,which have been met by the City of Meridian, as documented in this study. First, as specified in 67-8204(2) of the Idaho Act, "development impact fees shall be calculated on the basis of levels of service for public facilities . . . applicable to existing development as well as DP Guthrie LLC 1 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT new growth and development." Second, Idaho requires a Capital Improvements Plan (aka UP in Meridian) [see 67-8208]. The UP requirements are summarized in this report, with more detailed information maintained by City staff responsible for each type of infrastructure funded by impact fees. Third,the Idaho Act states the cost per service unit (i.e., impact fee) may not exceed the cost of growth-related system improvements divided by the number of projected service units attributable to new development [see 67-8204(16)]. Fourth, Idaho requires a proportionate share determination [see 67-8207]. The City of Meridian has complied by considering various types of applicable credits that may reduce the capital costs attributable to new development. Fifth, Idaho requires a Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee established to: a) assist in adopting land use assumptions, b) review the UP and file written comments, c) monitor and evaluate implementation of the CFP, d)file periodic reports on perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing DIFs, and e) advise the governmental entity of the need to update the LUA, UP and DIF study. Proposed Impact Fees Figure 1 summarizes the methods and cost components used for each type of public facility in Meridian's 2022 impact fee study. City Council may change the proposed impact fees by eliminating infrastructure types, cost components, and/or specific capital improvements. If changes are made during the adoption process, DP Guthrie LLC will update the impact fee study to be consistent with legislative policy decisions. Figure 1: Proposed Fee Methods and Cost Components Type of Impact Service Incremental Expansion CostAllocation Fee Area (current standards) Parks and Park Improvements, Recreation Citywide Land for Parks,and Residential Facilities Recreation Centers Functional Population and Inbound Vehicle Police Facilities Citywide Police Buildings Trips to Nonresidential Development Fire Buildings, Functional Fire Facilities Citywide Apparatus, Population Communications& and Jobs Equipment DP Guthrie LLC 2 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure 2 summarizes proposed 2022 impact fees for new development in the City of Meridian. As discussed in Appendix A, DP Guthrie LLC recommends that residential fees be imposed by dwelling size, based on climate- controlled space. For a building with more than one residential unit, City staff will determine the average size threshold for the entire building by dividing total climate-controlled floor area, less ancillary building space, by the total number of dwellings in the building. Ancillary floor area includes community rooms,fitness centers, management offices, and maintenance areas. For nonresidential development, Commercial includes all buildings within a shopping center, plus stand-alone retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non-residential development not considered Commercial). Figure 2: Proposed Impact Fee Schedule Citywide Service Area Park and Police Fire Proposed Current Increase Proposed Recreation Facilities Facilities Total Total to Current Facilities (2022) (2019) Ratio Residential(perhousing unit)by5puare Feet of Climate-Controlled FloorArea 1200 or less $1,946 $190 $470 $2,606 $1,095 $1,511 2.38 1201 to 1700 $3,006 $294 $726 $4,026 $1,909 $2,117 2.11 1701 to 2500 $4,119 $402 $995 $5,516 $2,483 $3,033 2.22 2501 to 3200 $4,935 $482 $1,192 $6,609 $2,943 $3,666 2.25 3201 or more $5,544 $542 $1,339 1 $7,425 $3,4331 $3,992 12.16 Nonresidential(perspuare footofbuildinp) Commercial(Restaurant/Retail) $0.00 $1.23 $1.29 $2.52 $0.88 $1.64 2.86 All Other $0.00 $0.19 $0.96 $1.15 $0.46 $0.69 2.50 DP Guthrie LLC 3 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Parks and Recreation Impact Fees The 2022 impact fee for parks and recreation facilities will enable Meridian to maintain current infrastructure standards for improved acres of parks, acquire additional land for future parks, and expand floor area of recreation buildings. All parks and recreation facilities included in the impact fees have a citywide service area. Cost components are allocated 100% percent to residential development. Park Improvements Citywide parks have active amenities, such as a soccer/football/baseball fields, basketball/volleyball courts, and playgrounds that will attract patrons from the entire service area. As shown in Figure PR1,the updated infrastructure standard is 2.66 acres per 1,000 residents based on Meridian's projected population in 2023 and completion of Phase 2 improvements to Discovery Park by the end of Fiscal Year 2023. Projected need for park improvements is shown at the bottom of Figure PR1. From 2023 through 2032, Meridian will improve 87 acres of parks, expected to cost approximately$35.76 million. DP Guthrie LLC 4 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure PR1: Improvements Standard and Need for Improved Acres Location Improved Acres Discovery Park 63.19 Julius M. Kleiner Park 58.20 Settlers Park 57.74 Heroes Park 30.13 Fuller Park 23.20 BearCreak Park 18.82 Tully Park 18.68 Storey Park&Bark Park 17.85 Gordon Harris Park 11.13 Hillsdale Park 9.54 Reta Huskey Park 8.92 Jabil Soccer Fields 8.40 Keith Bird Legacy Park 7.50 Seasons Park 7.13 Chateau Park 6.70 Renaissance Park 6.53 Champion Park 5.98 Heritage MS Ball Fields 5.60 8th Street Park 2.78 Meridian Pool Park 1.31 City Hall Plaza 0.90 Centennial Park 0.40 Generations Plaza 0.24 Tota 1 370.85 Allocation Factors for Parks Improvements Cost per Acre $411,000 Residential Proportionate Share 100% Service Units Population in 2023 139,249 Infrastructure Standards for Park Improvements Improved Acres Residential(per person) 0.00266 Park Improvement Needs Year Population Improved Acres Base 2022 Year 1 2023 139,249 370.8 Year2 2024 145,028 386.2 Year3 2025 151,006 402.2 Year4 2026 154,310 411.0 Years 2027 157,614 419.8 Year10 2032 171,903 457.8 2023-2032Increase 32,654 87.0 Growth Cost of Parks=> $35,757,000 DP Guthrie LLC 5 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Land for Parks In the 2019 study, land for additional parks was only 1%of the growth cost and no standard was documented. In the 2022 study, land for additional parks is 26%of the growth cost for parks & recreation. Additional land for parks is estimated to cost$150,000 per acre. City staff obtained supporting documentation for the land cost factor from local appraisals,with input from the DIF Advisory Committee. As shown in Figure PR2,the current infrastructure standard for park land is 3.14 acres per 1,000 residents. In comparison to inventory of improved parks,the table below includes the following changes: 1. Phase 3 acreage added to Discovery Park 2. Inserted West Regional Park site 3. Deleted Jabil Soccer Fields (not owned by Meridian) 4. Deleted Heritage Middle School Ballfields (not owned by Meridian) At the bottom of the table below is a needs analysis for park land. To maintain the current standard over the next ten years, Meridian will acquire 120.5 acres of land for future parks, which is expected to cost approximately $18.08 million. DP Guthrie LLC 6 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure PR2: Land Standard and Need for Park Sites Park Sites Land Area(acres) Discovery Park 77.69 Julius M. Kleiner Park 58.20 Settlers Park 57.74 West Regional Park 47.16 Heroes Park 30.13 Fuller Park 23.20 Bear Creak Park 18.82 Tully Park 18.68 Storey Park&Bark Park 17.85 Gordon Harris Park 11.13 Hillsdale Park 9.54 Reta Huskey Park 8.92 Keith Bird Legacy Park 7.50 Seasons Park 7.13 Chateau Park 6.70 Renaissance Park 6.53 Champion Park 5.98 8th Street Park 2.78 Meridian Pool Park 1.31 City Hall Plaza 0.90 Centennial Park 0.40 Generations Plaza 0.24 Total 418.51 Allocation Factors for Park Land Land Cost per Acre $150,000 Residential Proportionate Share 100% Service Units Population in 20221 133,470 Infrastructure Standards for Park Land Park Sites(acres) Residential(per person) 0.00314 Park Land Needs Year Population Park Sites(acres) Base 2022 133,470 418.5 Year 1 2023 139,249 436.6 Year2 2024 145,028 454.7 Year3 2025 151,006 473.5 Year4 2026 154,310 483.9 Years 2027 157,614 494.2 Year10 2032 1 171,903 539.0 2022-20321ncrease 38,433 120.5 Growth Cost of additional Park Land=> $18,075,000 DP Guthrie LLC 7 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Recreation Buildings Figure PR3 lists floor area for parks and recreation buildings in 2022, including the maintenance shop, which is consistent with approach used for public safety facilities. As shown in their respective sections of this report,the building inventories for fire and police include support facilities for administration and training. City staff provided the cost estimate of$670 per square foot to construct future recreation buildings. The lower portion of the table below indicates projected service units over the next ten years. To maintain current standards, Meridian will need 22,827 additional square feet of recreation building space, expected to cost approximately$15.29 million. Figure PR3: Infrastructure Standards and Needs for Recreation Buildings Existing Buildings Square Feet Meridian Homecourt 51,303 Parks Maintenance Shop(1700 E Lanark) 15,264 Pool Building 8,505 Meridian Community Center 4,200 Tota 1 79,272 Allocation Factors for Parks&Recreation Buildings Recreation Building Cost per Square Foot $670 Residential Proportionate Share 100% 2022 Meridian Population 133,470 Square Feet Residential(per person) 0.59 Building Needs Year Population Square Feet Base 2022 133,470 79,272 Year 1 2023 139,249 82,704 Year 2 2024 145,028 86,137 Year3 2025 151,006 89,687 Year4 2026 154,310 91,650 Years 2027 157,614 93,612 Year6 2028 160,919 95,575 Year7 2029 164,223 97,537 Year8 2030 167,527 99,500 Year9 2031 169,715 100,799 Year 10 2032 1171,903 102,099 Ten-Yrincrease 38,433 22,827 Growth Cost for Parks& Recreation Buildings=> $15,294,000 DP Guthrie LLC 8 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to parks and recreation facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Because impact fees fully fund expected growth costs, there is no potential double-payment from other revenue sources. Proposed and Current Impact Fees At the top of Figure PR4 is a summary of the infrastructure needs for parks and recreation facilities due to growth. In addition to the growth cost of parks and recreation facilities, impact fees include the cost of professional services related to the CFP (authorized by the Idaho impact fee enabling legislation), less the projected park impact fee fund balance at the end of the current fiscal year. The net growth cost of$66,826,219 divided by the projected increase in population from 2022 to 2032,yields a cost of$1,738 per service unit. To be consistent with 67-8204(16) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, impact fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per dwelling. Please see Appendix A for supporting documentation on the average number of persons by dwelling size in Meridian. Figure PR4: Parks and Recreation Impact Fee Schedule 2022 Input Variables Growth Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Quantity Over Cost Factor Growth Cost Units Ten Years per Unit (rounded) Park Improvements acres 87.0 $411,000 $35,757,000 Additional Park Sites(land) acres 120.5 $150,000 $18,075,000 Parks&Recreation Buildings sq ft 22,827 $670 $15,294,000 Total=> $69,126,000 Professional Services Cost=> $7,680 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2022=> ($2,307,461) Net Growth Cost=> $66,826,219 Population Increase 2022 to 2032 38,433 Cost per Service Unit $1,738 Residential impact Fees(per dwelling) Proposed Proposed to Square Feet of Climate- Persons per Parks& Current Increase Current Controlled Space Housing Unit Recreation Fees Ratio Fee 1200 or less 1.12 $1,946 $781 $1,165 2.49 1201 to 1700 1.73 $3,006 $1,361 $1,645 2.21 1701 to 2500 2.37 $4,119 $1,770 $2,349 2.33 2501 to 3200 2.84 $4,935 $2,098 $2,837 2.35 3201 or more 3.19 $5,544 $2,447 1 $3,097 1 2.27 DP Guthrie LLC 9 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Forecast of Revenues for Parks and Recreation Figure PR5 indicates Meridian should receive almost$68 million in parks and recreation impact fee revenue over the next ten years, if actual development matches the projections documented in Appendix A. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down,there will be a corresponding change in the need for infrastructure and impact fee revenue. The revenue projection assumes the average single-family dwelling has 2501 to 3200 square feet of climate-controlled space and the average multifamily unit has 1201 to 1700 square feet of floor area. Figure PR5: Projected Impact Fee Revenue Ten-Year Growth Cost=> $66,826,219 Parks&Recreation Impact Fee Revenue Single Family Multi family $4,935 $3,006 Year per housing unit per housing unit Hsg Units Hsg Units Base 2022 41,617 9,427 Year 1 2023 43,217 10,227 Year 2 2024 44,767 10,877 Year3 2025 46,117 11,427 Year 4 2026 47,317 11,827 Year 5 2027 48,265 12,231 Year 6 2028 49,212 12,634 Year7 2029 50,160 13,038 Year8 2030 51,107 13,441 Year9 2031 51,836 13,752 Year 10 2032 1 52,565 1 14,062 Ten-Yr I ncrease 10,948 4,635 Projected Revenue=> $54,030,000 $13,930,000 Total Revenue=> $67,960,000 DP Guthrie LLC 1O 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Comprehensive Financial Plan for Parks and Recreation As specified in 67-8203(29), development impact fees in Meridian exclude costs to provide better service to existing development. Existing parks and recreation buildings are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. Expansion of buildings may include support facilities for administration and maintenance. City staff recommends the improvements listed in Figure PR6 to accommodate additional development over the next ten years. Figure PR6: Summary of Ten-Year UP for Parks and Recreation Needed Planned I mproved Acres 87.0 93.2 Land for Parks(acres) 120.5 120.5 Recreation Building Sq Ft 22,827 22,800 FY Description Amount units Cost 2023 Parks&Recreation Building Design $1,500,000 2024 Parks&Recreation Building Construction 22,800 square feet $13,776,000 2025 Graycliff Park Design $185,000 2026 Graycliff Park Construction 11.5 acres $4,541,500 2026 West Regional Park Design $500,000 2027 West Regional Park Construction 47.2 acres $18,899,200 20271ri-scovery Park Phase 3 D- 11 111 2028 jlDiscovery Park Phase 3 Construction11 1 • MargaretAldape Park 1- 994 111 2030 MargaretAlclape Park Phase 1 Construction20.0 acres $7,226,000 2031 2032 2023-32 Additional Park Sites 120.5 acres $18,075,000 Total=> $71,656,200 Growth Needs to Maintain Current LOS=> $66,826,219 DP Guthrie LLC �� 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Police Impact Fees The City of Meridian will use an incremental expansion cost method to maintain existing infrastructure standards for police buildings. Proportionate Share In Meridian, police and fire infrastructure standards, projected needs, and development fees are based on both residential and nonresidential development. As shown in Figure P1,functional population was used to allocate public safety infrastructure and costs to residential and nonresidential development. Functional population is like the U.S. Census Bureau's "daytime population," by accounting for people living and working in a jurisdiction. Functional population also considers commuting patterns and time spent at residential versus nonresidential locations. Residents that don't work are assigned 20 hours per day to residential development and four hours per day to nonresidential development (annualized averages). Residents that work in Meridian are assigned 14 hours to residential development and 10 hours to nonresidential development. Residents that work outside Meridian are assigned 14 hours to residential development. Inflow commuters are assigned 10 hours to nonresidential development. Based on 2019 functional population data for Meridian,the cost allocation for residential development is 72%while nonresidential development accounts for 28%of the demand for police and fire infrastructure. Figure P1: Functional Population Functional Population Cost Allocation for Public Safety Demand Units in 2019 Demand Person Residential Hours/Day Hours Population* 114,161 61% Residents Not Working 69,079 20 1,381,580 39% Resident Workers** 45,082 23% Worked in City** 10,148 14 142,072 77% Worked Outside City** 34,934 14 489,076 Residential Subtotal 2,012,728 Residential Share=> 72% Nonresidential Non-working Residents 69,079 4 276,316 Jobs Located in City** 49,856 20% Residents Working in City** 10,148 10 101,480 80% Inflow Commuters 39,708 10 397,080 Nonresidential Subtotal 774,876 Nonresidential Share=> 28% * 2019 U.S. Census Bureau population estimate. TOTAL 2,787,604 ** 2019 Inflow/Outflow Analysis, OnTheMop web application, U.S. Census Bureau data for all jobs. DP Guthrie LLC 12 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Excluded Costs Police development fees in Meridian exclude costs to meet existing needs and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards. The City's CFP addresses the cost of these excluded items. Also excluded from the police development fees are public safety vehicles and equipment that do not meet the minimum useful life requirement in Idaho's Impact Fee Act. Current Use and Available Capacity In Meridian, police facilities are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. Meridian has determined that police building space will require expansion to accommodate future development. Police Facilities, Service Units, and Standards Police development fees in Meridian are based on the same level of service provided to existing development. Figure P2 inventories police buildings in Meridian. Because the training center is also used by the Fire Department,floor area was reduced to indicate the portion used by Meridian police. For residential development, Meridian will use year-round population within the service areas to derive current police infrastructure standards. For nonresidential development, Meridian will use inbound, average-weekday, vehicle trips as the service unit. Figure P2 indicates the allocation of police building space to residential and nonresidential development, along with FY23 service units in Meridian. Vehicle trips to nonresidential development are based on floor area estimates for industrial, commercial, institutional, office and other services, as documented in the Land Use Assumptions. For police development fees, Meridian will use a cost factor of$660 per square foot (provided by City staff). The cost factor includes design and construction management. Based on FY23 service units,the standard in Meridian is 0.33 square feet of police building floor area per person in the service area. For nonresidential development, Meridian's standard is 0.09 square feet of police building per inbound vehicle trip to nonresidential development, on an average weekday. DP Guthrie LLC 13 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure P2: Meridian Police Buildings and Standards Police Buildings Square Feet Admin Building 33,000 Scenario Village 11,637 Police Pricinct-N 11,223 PSTC(half) 7,250 TOTAL 63,110 Source: Cityof Meridian Police Department. Police Buildings Standards Residential Nonresidential Proportionate Share(based on 72% 28% functional population) Growth Indicator Population Avg WkdyVeh Trips to Nonres Dev Service Units in FY23 i 139,2491 195,281 Square Feet per Service Unit 0.331 0.09 DP Guthrie LLC 14 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Police Infrastructure Needs Idaho's development fee enabling legislation requires jurisdictions to convert land use assumptions into service units and the corresponding need for additional infrastructure over the next ten years. As shown in Figure P3, projected population and inbound nonresidential vehicle trips drive the need for police buildings and vehicles. Meridian will need 13,745 additional square feet of police buildings. The ten-year, growth-related capital cost of police buildings is approximately$9.07 million. Figure P3: Police Facilities Needed to Accommodate Growth Police Infrastructure Standards and Capital Costs Buildings-Residential 0.33 Sq Ft per person Buildings-Nonresidential 0.09 Sq Ft pertrip Police Buildings Cost $660 per square foot Infrastructure Needed Veh Trips to Police Year Population Nonres in Meridian Buildings(sq ft) Base 2022 Year 1 2023 139,249 195,281 63,110 Year 2 2024 145,028 198,832 65,317 Year 3 2025 151,006 202,497 67,599 Year 4 2026 154,310 206,064 69,000 Years 2027 157,614 209,871 70,423 Year 6 2028 160,919 213,623 71,841 Year7 2029 164,223 217,451 73,265 Year8 2030 167,527 221,295 74,692 Year9 2031 169,715 225,340 75,772 Year10 2032 1 171,9031229,423176,855 2023-2032 Increase 32,654 34,142 13,745 Growth Cost of Police Buildings=> $9,072,000 Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to police facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Based on the City of Meridian's legislative policy decision to fully fund expected growth costs from impact fees,there is no potential double-payment from other revenue sources. Police Development Fees Infrastructure standards and cost factors for police are summarized in the upper portion of Figure P4. The conversion of infrastructure needs and costs per service unit into a cost per development unit is also shown in the table below. For residential development, average number of persons in a housing unit provides the necessary conversion. Persons per housing unit, by size threshold are documented in the Land Use Assumptions. DP Guthrie LLC 15 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT For nonresidential development,trip generation rates by type of development are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE 2022). To ensure the analysis is based on travel demand associated with nonresidential development within Meridian,trip ends (entering and exiting) are converted to inbound trips using a basic 50%adjustment factor. In addition to the growth cost of police facilities, impact fees include the cost of professional services related to the CFP (authorized by the Idaho Impact Fee Act). Figure P4: Police Impact Fees per Development Unit 2022 Input Variables Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Growth Quantity Cost Factor Growth Cost Units Over Ten Years per Unit (rounded) Police Buildings square feet 13,745 $660 $9,072,000 Professional Services Cost=> $7,680 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2022=> $0 Cost Allocation Net Growth Cost=> $9,079,680 Residential 72% Nonresidential 28% Allocated Cost by Land Use Residential $6,537,370 Nonresidential $2,542,310 Growth 2022 to 2032 Cost perService Unit Residential(persons) 38,433 $170 Nonresidential 37,601 $67 (vehicle trips) Residential Impact Fees(per housing unit) Square Feet of Climate-Controlled Persons per Proposed Police Current Proposed Increase to Current Space Housing Unit Facilities Fees Fees Ratio 1200 or less 1.12 $190 $56 $134 3.39 1201 to 1700 1.73 $294 $98 $196 3.00 1701 to 2500 2.37 $402 $128 $274 3.14 2501 to 3200 2.84 $482 $152 $330 3.17 3201 or more 3.19 $542 $177 $365 3.06 Nonresidential Impact Fees(square foot of building) Avg Wkdy Veh Trip Adjustment Proposed TripEnds per Factors Proposed p Police Current Type KSF Facilities Fees Increase to Current Ratio Fees Commercial(Restaurant/Retail) 37.01 50% $1.23 $0.24 $0.99 5.13 All Other 5.76 50% $0.19 $0.05 $0.14 3.80 DP Guthrie LLC 16 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Projected Revenue for Police Facilities Over the next ten years, police development fee revenue is projected to approximately match the growth cost of police infrastructure, which has a ten-year total cost of approximately$9.08 million (see the upper portion of Figure P5). The table below indicates Meridian should receive approximately$9.1 million in police development fee revenue, if actual development matches the land use assumptions. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the need for infrastructure and development fee revenue. The revenue projection assumes the average single-family dwelling has 2501 to 3200 square feet of climate-controlled space and the average multifamily unit has 1201 to 1700 square feet of floor area. Figure P5: Police Development Fee Revenue Ten-Year Growth Cost of Police Facilities=> $9,079,680 Police Impact Fee Revenue Single Family Multi family Industrial Commercial Institutional Office&Other Services $482 $294 $190 $1,230 $190 $190 per housing unit per housing unit per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft Year Hsg Units Hsg Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2022 41,617 9,427 11,740 6,570 5,270 7,360 Year 2023 43,217 10,227 11,950 6,690 5,360 7,490 Year2 2024 44,767 10,877 12,170 6,810 5,460 7,630 Year3 2025 46,117 11,427 12,380 6,940 5,560 7,760 Year 4 2026 47,317 11,827 12,610 7,060 5,660 7,900 Year5 2027 48,265 12,231 12,840 7,190 5,760 8,050 Year6 2028 49,212 12,634 13,070 7,320 5,860 8,190 Year7 2029 50,160 13,038 13,300 7,450 5,970 8,340 Year8 2030 51,107 13,441 13,540 7,580 6,080 8,490 Year9 2031 51,836 13,752 13,790 7,720 6,190 8,640 Year10 2032 52,565 14,062 14,030 7,860 6,300 8,800 Ten-Yrincrease 10,948 4,635 2,290 1,290 1,030 1,440 Projected Revenue=> $5,280,000 $1,360,000 $435,000 $1,587,000 $196,000 $274,000 Total Projected Revenues(rounded)=> $9,132,000 DP Guthrie LLC 17 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Comprehensive Financial Plan for Police City staff recommends the improvements listed in Figure P6 to accommodate additional development over the next ten years. Impact fees will contribute approximately$9.1 million for Phase 3 of the Public Safety Training Center. Other revenue sources will be required to fund the additional cost of police facilities over the next ten years. Figure P6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Police Needed Planned Building Sq Ft 13,745 17,000 FY Description Amount Units Cost 2023 2024 2025 Public Safety Training Center Phase 3 17,000 square feet $11,220,000 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total=> $11,220,000 Growth Needs to Maintain Current LOS=> $9,079,680 DP Guthrie LLC 18 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Fire Impact Fees DP Guthrie LLC recommends functional population to allocate the cost of additional fire infrastructure to residential and nonresidential development (see Figure P1 above and related text). Fire development fees in Meridian are based on the same level of service currently provided to existing development. Existing Standards for Fire Facilities Figure F1 inventories Fire Department buildings in Meridian. Because the training center is also used by the Police Department,floor area was reduced to indicate the portion used by Meridian Fire Department. Based on service units in FY23,the standard for fire buildings is 0.52 square feet per person and 0.52 square feet per job. Figure F1: Existing Fire Buildings Fire Stations Square Feet Fire Admin Space(City Hall) 13,511 Fire Station#1(540 E. Franklin Rd) 11,700 Fire Station#6(1435 W Overland Rd) 10,299 Fire Station#7(2385 Lake Hazel Rd) 10,299 Fire Station#8(4250 N Owyhee Storm Ave) 10,299 Fire Station#5(6001 N Linder Rd) 7,360 PSTC(half) 7,250 Fire Station#4(2515 S Eagle Rd) 7,077 Fire Station#3(3545 N Locust Grove) 7,040 Fire Station#2(2401 N Ten M ile Rd) 6,770 Training Tower @ Station#1 6,523 Fire Safety Center(1901 Leighfield Dr) 1,744 TOTAL 99,872 Allocation Factors for Fire Stations Residential Share 72% Functional Nonresidential Share 28% Population Population in 2023 139,249 Jobs in 2023 53,547 Infrastructure Standards for Fire Stations Square Feet Residential(per person) 0.52 Nonresidential(perjob) 0.52 DP Guthrie LLC 19 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Development fees will be used to expand the fleet of fire vehicles and purchase equipment with a useful life of at least ten years. Figure F2 lists fire vehicles and equipment currently used by the Meridian Fire Department. Following the same methodology used for fire buildings, the total cost of fire vehicles and equipment was allocated 72%to residential and 28%to nonresidential development in Meridian. As shown below, every additional resident will require Meridian to spend approximately$75 for additional fire vehicles and equipment. Every additional job requires the City to spend approximately$74 for additional fire vehicles and equipment. Figure F2: Existing Standards for Fire Vehicles Fire Apparatus and Equipment Code Total Cost Engines FE $6,178,923 Ladder Truck LT $4,400,000 Pickup Trucks PT $590,975 Other Vehicles OV $431,296 Communications&Equipment CE $2,244,978 TOTAL $13,846,172 Allocation Factors for Fire Apparatus and Communications Residential Share 72% Functional Nonresidential Share 28% population Population in 2022 133,470 Jobs in 2022 52,602 Infrastructure Standards for Fire Apparatus and Communications Apparatus and Communications Residential(per person) $74.69 Nonresidential(perjob) $73.70 DP Guthrie LLC 20 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Fire Infrastructure Needs The City's Comprehensive Plan and website describe existing fire facilities. In Meridian,fire facilities are fully utilized and there is no surplus capacity for future development. The City has determined that fire facilities will require expansion to accommodate future development. As specified in 67-8203(29), development impact fees in Meridian exclude costs to repair, upgrade, update, expand or replace existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development. To accommodate projected development, Meridian will expand fire buildings by 21,741 square feet and spend approximately$3.63 million to purchase additional fire vehicles and equipment. Figure F3: Growth-Related Need for Fire Facilities Fire Infrastructure Standards and Capital Costs Fire Buildings-Residential 0.52 Sq Ft per person Fire Buildings-Nonresidential 0.52 Sq Ft perjob Fire Buildings Cost $864 per square foot Fire Apparatus/Communications-Residential $74.69 Cost per person Fire Apparatus/Communications-Nonres $73.70 Cost perjob Facilities Needed Population Meridian Sq Ft of Fire Fire Apparatus and Year Jobs Stations Communications Base 2022 $13,846,172 Year 1 2023 139,249 53,547 99,872 $14,347,471 Year 2 2024 145,028 54,514 103,361 $14,850,391 Year3 2025 151,006 55,496 106,961 $15,369,281 Year4 2026 154,310 56,496 109,190 $15,689,784 Years 2027 157,614 57,514 111,428 $16,011,613 Year6 2028 160,919 58,552 113,676 $16,334,917 Year7 2029 164,223 59,607 115,933 $16,659,474 Year8 2030 167,527 60,680 118,200 $16,985,357 Year9 2031 169,715 61,774 119,901 $17,229,431 Year 10 2032 1 171,9031 62,8881 121,6131 $17,474,979 Increase 32,654 9,341 21,741 $3,628,807 Cost of Fire Stations=> $18,784,000 Cost of Fire Apparatus and Communications=> $3,629,000 Total Growth Cost=> $22,413,000 Revenue Credit Evaluation Currently the City of Meridian does not have any outstanding debt related to fire facilities. Therefore, a revenue credit for bond payments is not applicable. As shown in the cash flow analysis below, projected impact fee revenue matches the growth cost of new facilities. Based on the City of Meridian's legislative policy decision to fully fund expected growth costs from impact fees,there is no potential double-payment from other revenue sources. DP Guthrie LLC 21 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Current and Proposed Fire Impact Fees Figure F4 indicates proposed impact fees for fire facilities in Meridian. Residential fees are derived from average number of persons per housing unit and the cost per person. Nonresidential fees are based on average jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area and the cost per job. The cost factors for fire facilities are summarized in the upper portion of Figure F4. Persons per unit, by dwelling size, are based on local data, as discussed in the Land Use Assumptions. For nonresidential development, average jobs per thousand square feet of floor area are also documented in the Land Use Assumptions. To be consistent with 67-8204(16) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, impact fees are derived using the cost per service unit multiplied by the average number of service units per development unit. Proposed nonresidential development fees for fire facilities are shown in the column with light orange shading. The 2022 study recommends nonresidential fees by two general categories, Commercial and All Other types of nonresidential development. Commercial includes all buildings within a shopping center, plus stand-alone retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non-residential development not considered Commercial). DP Guthrie LLC 22 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure F4: Fee Schedule for Fire Facilities 20221nput Variables Cost Infrastructure Type Infrastructure Growth Quantity Factor Growth Cost Units Over Ten Years per Unit (rounded) Fire Buildings square feet 21,741 $864 $18,784,000 Fire Apparatus dollars $3,629,000 Total=> $22,413,000 Professional Services Cost=> $7,680 Less Projected Fund Balance 9/30/2022=> $0 CostAllocation Net Growth Cost=> $22,420,680 Residential 1 72% Nonresidential 128% Allocated Cost by Land Use Residential $16,142,890 Nonresidential 1 $6,277,790 Growth 2022 to 2032 Cost perService Unit Residential(persons) 38,433 $420 Nonresidential(jobs) 10,286 $610 Residential impact Fees(per housing unit) Square Feet of Climate-Controlled Persons per Proposed Fire Current Proposed Increase to Current Space Housing Unit Facilities Fee Fees Ratio 1200 or less 1.12 $470 $258 $212 1.82 1201 to 1700 1.73 $726 $450 $276 1.61 1701 to 2500 2.37 $995 $585 $410 1.70 2501 to 3200 2.84 $1,192 $693 $499 1.72 3201 or more 3.19 $1,339 $809 $530 1.66 Nonresidential Impact Fees(square foot of building) Jobs per1,000 Proposed Fire Current Proposed Type Increase to Current Sq Ft Facilities Fee Fees Ratio Commercial(Restaurant/Retail) 2.12 $1.29 $0.64 $0.65 2.02 AIIOther 11.58 1 $0.961 $0.411 $0.55 12.34 DP Guthrie LLC 23 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Projected Revenue for Fire Facilities Over the next ten years,fire development fee revenue is projected to approximately match the growth cost of fire infrastructure, which is approximately$22.42 million (see the upper portion of Figure F5). The table below indicates Meridian should receive approximately$22.65 million in fire development fee revenue, if actual development matches the land use assumptions. To the extent the rate of development either accelerates or slows down, there will be a corresponding change in the development fee revenue. The revenue projection assumes the average single-family dwelling has 2501 to 3200 square feet of climate-controlled space and the average multifamily unit has 1201 to 1700 square feet of floor area. Figure F5: Fire Development Fee Revenue Ten-Year Cost of Growth-Related Fire Facilities=> $22,420,680 Fire Impact Fee Revenue Single Family Multi family Industrial Commercial Institutional Office and Other Services $1,192 $726 $960 $1,290 $960 $960 Year per housing unit per housing unit per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Sq Ft per 1000 Scl Ft per 1000 Sq Ft Hsg Units Hsg Units KSF KSF KSF KSF Base 2022 41,617 9,427 11,740 6,570 5,270 7,360 Year 1 2023 43,217 10,227 11,950 6,690 5,360 7,490 Year2 2024 44,767 10,877 12,170 6,810 5,460 7,630 Year3 2025 46,117 11,427 12,380 6,940 5,560 7,760 Year4 2026 47,317 11,827 12,610 7,060 5,660 7,900 Year5 2027 48,265 12,231 12,840 7,190 5,760 8,050 Year6 2028 49,212 12,634 13,070 7,320 5,860 8,190 Year7 2029 50,160 13,038 13,300 7,450 5,970 8,340 Year8 2030 51,107 13,441 13,540 7,580 6,080 8,490 Year9 2031 51,836 13,752 13,790 7,720 6,190 8,640 Year 10 2032 52,565 14,062 14,030 7,860 6,300 8,800 Ten-Yrincrease 10,948 4,635 2,290 1,290 1,030 1,440 Projected Revenue=> $13,050,000 $3,370,000 $2,200,000 $1,660,000 $990,000 $1,380,000 Total Projected Revenues(rounded)=> $22,650,000 DP Guthrie LLC 24 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Comprehensive Financial Plan for Fire Facilities Using impact fee funding over the next ten years, Figure F6 indicates that Meridian plans to expand fire building space by 21,741 square feet. Meridian will also purchase additional fire vehicles costing approximately$6.63 million. The total cost for planned projects is approximately$25.42 million. The growth needs funded by impact fees is approximately$22.42 million over ten years. Other revenues will be required to fully fund the Fire Department's CFP. Figure F6: Summary of Ten-Year CFP for Fire Facilities Needed Planned Building Sq Ftl 21,741 1 21,741 Apparatus and Equipmentl $3,629,000 1 $6,632,469 FY Description Amount Units Cost 2023 2024 Fire Station#1 Vehicle $686,834 2025 Radios 16 $160,000 2025 Ladder Truck @Fire Station#6 1 $2,200,000 2026 Additional Cardiac Monitors $140,000 2026 Additional Fire Station Design $720,000 2027 Additional Fire Station Construction 12,000 square feet $9,648,000 2027 Additional Fire Station Engine $686,834 2027 Hydraulic Extrication Tool 2 $250,000 2027 Thermal Imaging Cameras 5 $70,400 2028 Ladder Truck @Fire Station#10 1 $2,200,000 2028 SCBAs for new apparatus $140,000 2030 Additional Battalion Chief Vehicle 1 $98,401 2023 to Building Design $720,000 2032 2023 to Expand Fire Buildings 9,741 square feet $7,696,100 2032 Total=> $25,416,569 Growth Needs to Maintain Current LOS=> $22,420,680 DP Guthrie LLC 25 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Fee Implementation and Administration Consistent with best practices and Idaho's enabling legislation, Meridian updates capital improvements and development impact fees every five years. In addition, some jurisdictions make annual adjustments for inflation using a price index like the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index published by McGraw-Hill Companies. This index could be applied to the adopted impact fee schedule, reviewed by the Advisory Committee,then approved by City Council. If cost estimates or demand indicators change significantly,the City should redo the fee calculations. Another best practice is to spend impact fees as soon as possible, tracking funds according to first in,first out accounting, using aggregate rather than project-specific tracking. Impact fees and accrued interest are maintained in a separate fund that is not comingled with other revenues. In Idaho, an annual report is mandatory, indicating impact fee collections, expenditures, and fund balances by type of infrastructure. Cost of CFP Preparation As stated in Idaho's enabling legislation, a surcharge on the collection of development impact fees may be used to fund the cost of preparing the CFP that is attributable to the impact fee determination. A minor cost of$7,680 per infrastructure type was added to the 2022 Meridian impact fee study. Development Categories Proposed impact fees for residential development are by square feet of climate-controlled space, excluding porches, garage and unfinished space, such as basements and attics. For an apartment building,the average size threshold is derived for an entire building. The recommended procedure is to identify the aggregate climate- controlled floor area for the entire building, excluding ancillary space for community rooms,fitness centers, management office and maintenance areas, divided by the number of dwelling units in the building. Apartment complexes and some residential development provide common areas for use by residents, such as exercise rooms and clubhouses. Common areas for the private use of residents are ancillary uses to the dwelling units and not subject to additional impact fees. Section 67-8204(20) of the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act states that an addition to an existing residential building,that does not increase the number of service units, should be exempt from additional impact fees. Given the relatively small fee increase across size thresholds and the high transaction cost to assess fees for additions to residential buildings, DP Guthrie LLC recommends that additions to residential buildings should not be subject to additional impact fees. The two general nonresidential development categories in the proposed impact fee schedule can be used for all new construction within Meridian. Nonresidential development categories represent general groups of land uses that share similar average weekday vehicle trip generation rates and job density(i.e.,jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area), as documented in Appendix A. "Commercial" includes retail development and eating/drinking places (i.e., restaurants and bars). All land uses within a shopping center will pay the impact fee for commercial development. All Other includes industrial, warehousing, offices, business services, and personal services (i.e., every type of non-residential development not considered Commercial). DP Guthrie LLC 26 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT An applicant may submit an independent study to document unique demand indicators (i.e., service units per development unit). The independent study should be prepared by a professional engineer or certified planner and use the same type of input variables as those in Meridian's impact fee study. For residential development, impact fees are based on average persons per housing unit. For nonresidential development, impact fees are based on inbound average weekday vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet of floor area, and the average number of jobs per 1,000 square feet of floor area. The independent fee study will be reviewed by City staff and can be accepted as the basis for a unique fee calculation. If staff determines the independent fee study is not reasonable,the applicant may appeal the administrative decision to Meridian's elected officials for their consideration. Credits and Reimbursements A general requirement that is common to impact fee methodologies is the evaluation of credits. A revenue credit may be necessary to avoid potential double payment situations arising from one-time impact fees plus on-going payment of other revenues that may also fund growth-related capital improvements. The determination of revenue credits is dependent upon the impact fee methodology used in the cost analysis. Policies and procedures related to site-specific credits should be addressed in the ordinance that establishes the impact fees. Project-level improvements, required as part of the development approval process, are not eligible for credits against impact fees. If a developer constructs a system improvement included in the fee calculations, it will be necessary to either reimburse the developer or provide a credit against the fees. The latter option is more difficult to administer because it creates unique fees for specific geographic areas. Based on national experience, DP Guthrie LLC recommends a jurisdiction establish a reimbursement agreement with the developer that constructs a system improvement. The reimbursement agreement should be limited to a payback period of no more than ten years and the City should not pay interest on the outstanding balance. The developer must provide documentation of the actual cost incurred for the system improvement. The City should only agree to pay the lesser of the actual construction cost or the estimated cost used in the impact fee analysis. If the City pays more than the cost used in the fee analysis, there will be insufficient fee revenue. Reimbursement agreements should only obligate the City to reimburse developers annually according to actual fee collections from the benefiting area. The supporting documentation for each type of impact fee describes the types of infrastructure considered to be system improvements. Site specific credits or developer reimbursements for one type of system improvement does not negate an impact fee for other system improvements. DP Guthrie LLC 27 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Appendix A: Land Use Assumptions Appendix A contains the land use assumptions for Meridian's 2019 DIF update. The CFP must be developed in coordination with the Advisory Committee and utilize land use assumptions most recently adopted by the appropriate land planning agency [see Idaho Code 67-8206(2)]. Idaho's enabling legislation defines land use assumptions as: "a description of the service area and projections of land uses, densities, intensities, and population in the service area over at least a 20-year period." Service Areas To ensure a substantial benefit to new development paying impact fees,the City of Meridian has evaluated collection and expenditure zones for public facilities that may have distinct benefit or service areas. In the City of Meridian, impact fees for parks/recreation, police and fire facilities will benefit new development throughout the entire incorporated area. DP Guthrie LLC recommends one citywide service area for Meridian impact fees. Idaho Code 67-8203(26) defines "service area" as: "Any defined geographic area identified by a governmental entity, or by intergovernmental agreement, in which specific public facilities provide service to development within the area defined, on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles, or both." The City's adopted Future Land Use Map indicates land uses, densities, and intensities of development, as required by Idaho Code 67-8203(16). The service area is defined as all land within the city limits of Meridian, as modified over time. Summary of Growth Indicators Population, housing unit,jobs and nonresidential floor area are the "service units" or demand indicators that will be used to evaluate the need for growth-related infrastructure. The demographic data and development projections discussed below will also be used to demonstrate proportionality. All land use assumptions are consistent with Meridian's Comprehensive Plan. In contrast to the Comprehensive Plan, which is more general and has a long-range horizon, development impact fees require more specific quantitative analysis and have a short-range focus. Typically, impact fee studies look out five to ten years, with the expectation that fees will be periodically updated (e.g., every 5 years). Infrastructure standards will be calibrated using fiscal year 2018-19 data. In Meridian,the fiscal year begins on October 15Y Key development projections for the City of Meridian are housing units and nonresidential floor area, as shown in Figure Al. These projections will be used to estimate development fee revenue and to indicate the anticipated need for growth-related infrastructure. The goal is to have reasonable projections without being overly concerned with precision. Because impact fee methods are designed to reduce sensitivity to development projections in the determination of the proportionate-share fee amounts, if actual development is slower than projected,fee revenue will decline, but so will the need for growth-related infrastructure. In contrast, if development is faster than anticipated,the City will receive an increase in fee revenue, but will also need to accelerate infrastructure improvements to keep pace with the actual rate of development. DP Guthrie LLC 28 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Population and housing unit projections were provided by City staff. During the next ten years,the impact fee study assumes Meridian's population increases at a growth rate of approximately 2.56% per year. Over the next ten years,jobs are expected to increase at a growth rate of approximately 1.8% per year, which is from the Communities in Motion employment forecast from 2020 to 2050. Figure Al: Annual Development Projections Meridian Land Use Assumptions 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Population Housing Units Jobs Nonresidential Square Feet(in thousands) Proportionate Share The term "proportionate" is found throughout Idaho's Development Impact Fee Act. For example, Idaho Code 67- 8202(2) states the intent to, "Promote orderly growth and development by establishing uniform standards by which local governments may require that those who benefit from new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new public facilities needed to serve new growth and development;" DP Guthrie LLC 29 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Because DIFS must be proportionate, jurisdictions derive fees for various land uses per unit of development, as stated in Idaho Code 67-8404(17). "A development impact fee ordinance shall include a schedule of development impact fees for various land uses per unit of development. The ordinance shall provide that a developer shall have the right to elect to pay a project's proportionate share of system improvement costs by payment of development impact fees according to the fee schedule as full and complete payment of the development project's proportionate share of system improvement costs..." Even though formulas and methods are not specified in Idaho's Development Impact Fee Act, DIFs must be reasonable and fair, as stated in section 67-8201(1). "All development impact fees shall be based on a reasonable and fair formula or method under which the development impact fee imposed does not exceed a proportionate share of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the governmental entity in the provision of system improvements to serve the new development. In the following sections, DP Guthrie LLC describes reasonable and fair formulas and methods that can be used in the City of Meridian to make DIFs proportionate by size of residential development and type of nonresidential development. Residential Development and Persons per Housing Unit The 2010 census did not obtain detailed information using a "long-form" questionnaire. Instead,the U.S. Census Bureau has switched to a continuous monthly mailing of surveys, known as the American Community Survey (ACS), which is limited by sample-size constraints. For example, data on detached housing units are now combined with attached single units (commonly known as townhouses). Part of the rationale for imposing fees by size threshold, as discussed further below, is to address this ACS data limitation. Because townhouses and apartments generally have fewer bedrooms and less floor area than detached units, size thresholds make fees more proportionate, while facilitating construction of affordable units. As shown Figure A2, dwellings with a single unit per structure (detached and attached) average 2.84 persons per housing unit. Dwellings in structures with two or more units average 2.19 year-round residents per unit. This category includes duplexes,which have two dwellings on a single land parcel. According to the latest available data, the overall average is 2.75 year- round residents per housing unit and 2.82 persons per household. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, a household is a housing unit that is occupied by year-round residents. Development fees often use per capita standards and persons per housing unit, or persons per household, to derive proportionate-share fee amounts. DP Guthrie LLC recommends that fees for residential development in the City of Meridian be imposed according to the number of year-round residents per housing unit. DP Guthrie LLC 30 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure A2: Year-Round Persons per Unit by Type of Housing Meridian Population and Housing Characteristics Units in Structure Persons House- Persons per Housing Persons per Housing Vacancy holds Household Units Housing Unit Mix Rate Single Unit* 95,564 32,685 2.92 33,703 2.84 86% 3% All Other** 11,920 5,364 2.22 5,440 2.19 14% 1% Subtotal 107,484 38,049 2.82 39,143 2.75 3% Group Quarters 303 TOTAL 107,787 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25024, B2503Z B25033, and B26001. * Single unit includes attached and detached. ** All other includes multifamily and mobile homes. Demand Indicators by Dwelling Size Impact fees must be proportionate to the demand for infrastructure. Because the average number of persons per housing unit has a strong, positive correlation to the number of bedrooms, DP Guthrie LLC recommends residential fee schedules that increase by dwelling size. Custom tabulations of demographic data by bedroom range can be created from individual survey responses provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, in files known as Public Use Micro-Data Samples (PUMS). PUMS files are only available for areas of at least 100,000 persons, with the City of Meridian included in Public Use Micro-Data Area (PUMA) 701. As shown in Figure A3, DP Guthrie LLC derived average persons per housing unit by bedroom range, from un-weighted PUMS data. The recommended multipliers by bedroom range (shown below) are for all types of housing units, adjusted to the control total for Meridian (i.e., 2.75 persons per housing unit). Figure A3: Persons by Bedroom Range Recommended Multipliers(2) Bedrooms Persons Housing Persons per Housing (1) Units(1) Housing Unit Mix 0-1 53 43 1.33 3.0% 2 384 205 2.02 14.3% 3 1,5801 684 2.49 47.7% 4+ 1,6421 501 3.53 35.0% Tota 1 3,6591 1,433 2.75 1 100.0% (1) American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample for ID PUMA 701(2016-2020 5-year database). (2) Recommended persons per housing unit are scaled to make the average derived from PUMS survey data match the control total for Meridian (i.e. 2.75 persons per housing unit). DP Guthrie LLC 31 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT DIFs based on size of dwelling are generally easier to administer when expressed in square feet of finished living space for all types of housing. Basing fees on floor area rather than the number of bedrooms eliminates the need for criteria to make administrative decisions on whether a room qualifies as a bedroom. To translate dwelling size by number of bedrooms into square feet of living space, DP Guthrie LLC used the 2018 Ada County Assessor's residential database to derive average square feet by bedroom range (i.e.,two,three, and four or more bedrooms). DP Guthrie LLC recommends that DIFs for residential development be imposed based on finished square feet of living space, excluding garages, patios and porches that are not climate-controlled. Average floor area and number of persons by bedroom range are plotted in Figure A4, with a logarithmic trend line derived from actual averages for Meridian. Using the trend line formula shown in the chart, DP Guthrie LLC derived the estimated average number of persons, by dwelling size, in size thresholds like those currently used by the City of Boise. As shown with yellow highlighting, the lowest floor area range (1200 square feet or less) has an estimated average of 1.24 persons per housing unit. At the upper end of the floor area range (3201 or more square feet of climate- controlled space),the average is 3.53 persons per housing unit. For a building with more than one residential unit, City staff will determine the average size threshold for the entire building by dividing total climate-controlled floor area, less ancillary building space, by the total number of dwellings in the building. Ancillary floor area includes community rooms, fitness centers, management offices, and maintenance areas. In each impact fee worksheet,the person per housing unit values shown in Figure A4 were adjusted downward by multiplying the value for each size threshold by the ratio of 2.84 divided by 3.14. Figure A2 indicates an average of 2.84 persons per single-family unit in Meridian and 3.14 is the fitted-curve value for dwellings with 2501 to 3200 square feet, which is the middle range for single-family units. DP Guthrie LLC 32 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure A4: Persons by Square Feet of Living Space Average square feet for 2 to 4+ Survey of Construction Meridian Averages per Housing Unit Fitted-Curve Values bedrooms in Meridian was derived Square Feet(rounded) Bedrooms Sq Ft(rounded) Persons Sq Ft Range Persons from Ada County Assessor 1,100 0-1 1,000 1.33 1200 or less 1.24 residential database (units 1,800 2 1,500 2.02 1201 to 1700 1.91 constructed 2014 to 2018). 2,200 3 2,100 2.49 1701 to 2500 2.62 Average persons per housing unit by bedroom range is based on 3,400 4+ 2,900 3.53 2501 to 3200 3.14 2016-2020 ACS PUMS data for ID 2,700 <=Wt Avg=> 2,400 3201 or more 3.53 PUMA 701. Recommended Square Feet Ranges are similar to Boise size thresholds. Persons per Housing Unit in Meridian, ID 4.00 3.50 = 1.98841n(x) - 12.493 R2= 0.9651 +, 3.00 2.50 3 2 2.00 Gl O. c 1.50 N v a 1.00 0.50 0.00 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 Square Feet of Living Area DP Guthrie LLC 33 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Jobs and Nonresidential Development In addition to data on residential development, the calculation of impact fees requires data on nonresidential development. DP Guthrie LLC uses the term 'jobs" to refer to employment by place of work. In Figure A5, color shading indicates nonresidential development prototypes used by DP Guthrie LLC to derive average weekday vehicle trips and nonresidential floor area. For future industrial development, DP Guthrie LLC averaged Light Industrial (ITE code 110) and Warehousing(ITE 150)to derive an average of 1,239 square feet per industrial job. The prototype for future commercial development is an average-size Shopping Center(ITE code 820). Commercial development (i.e., retail and eating/drinking places) is assumed to average 471 square feet per job. For institutional development, such as schools, daycare and churches,the impact fee study assumes an average of 1,012 square feet per job. The prototype for institutional development is Assisted Living (ITE 254). For office and other services, an average-size Office (ITE 710) is the prototype for future development, averaging of 307 square feet per job. Figure A5: Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends ITE Land Use/ Demand Wkdy Trip Ends Wkdy Trip Ends Emp Per Sq Ft Code Unit Per Dmd Unit* Per Employee* Dmd Unit PerEmp 110 Light Industrial 1,000SgFt 4.87 3.10 1.57 637 140 Manufacturing 1,000 Sq Ft 4.75 2.51 1.89 528 150 Warehousing 1,000 Sq Ft 1.71 5.05 0.34 2,953 254 Assisted Living 1,000 Sq Ft 4.19 4.24 0.99 1,012 610 Hospital 1,000 Sq Ft 10.77 3.77 2.86 350 620 Nursing Home 1,000 Sq Ft 6.75 3.31 2.04 490 710 General Office 1,000SgFt 10.84 3.33 3.26 307 760 Research& Dev Center 1,000 Sq Ft 11.08 3.37 3.29 304 770 Business Park 1,000 Sq Ft 12.44 4.04 3.08 325 820 1 Shopping Center 1,000 Sq Ft 37.01 17.42 2.12 471 857 Discount Club 1,000 Sq Ft 1 42.46 32.21 1.32 759 Industrial in Meridian 1,000 Sq Ft 1 3.29 4.08 0.81 1,239 * Trip Generation,Institute of Transportation Engineers,11th Edition(2022). DP Guthrie LLC 34 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Figure A6 indicates 2019 estimates of jobs and nonresidential floor area within Meridian. Job estimates, by type of nonresidential, are from Meridian's Work Area Profile, available through the U.S. Census Bureau's online web application known as OnTheMap. The number of jobs in Meridian is based on quarterly workforce reports supplied by employers. Floor area estimates are derived from the number of jobs by type of nonresidential development and average square feet per job ratios, as discussed on the previous page. Total floor area of nonresidential development in Meridian is consistent with property tax parcel information obtained from Ada County. Figure A6: Jobs and Floor Area Estimates 2019 Jobs(1) Commercial(2) 13,237 26.6% Industrial(3) 8,983 18.0% Institutional(4) 4,934 9.9% Office&Other Services(5) 22,702 45.5% TOTAL 49,856 100.0% (1) Jobs in 2015 from Work Area Profile, OnTheMap,U.S. Census Bureau web application. (2) Major sectors are Retail and Accommodation/Food Services. (3) Major sectors are Construction, Manufacturing, Wholesale Trade, and Trans portation/Wareho using. (4) Major sectors are Educational Services and Public Administration. (5) Major sectors are Professional/Scientific/Technical Services and Health Care. DP Guthrie LLC 35 9/16/22 MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES REPORT Appendix B: Changes in Standards and Cost Factors Figure 131 summarizes changes to infrastructure standards and cost factors from the 2019 impact fee study to the 2022 update. For most public facilities, infrastructure standards have increased slightly over time, with the exception of park improvements. Since 2019, population has increased faster than acres of improved parks. Major changes accounting for the proposed impact fee increase are higher cost factors and the recommendation to acquire additional park sites using impact fees, based on the 2022 standard of 3.14 acres per thousand residents. In the 2019 study, land for additional parks was only 1%of the growth cost and no standard was documented. In the 2022 study, land for additional parks is 26%of the growth cost for parks & recreation. Figure B1: Comparison of Standards and Cost Factors Public Infrastructure Standard Cost Factor 2022 to 2019 Facility 2019 2022 Measure 2019 2022 Units Cost Ratio Park Improvements 2.91 2.66 acres perthousand $241,000 $411,000 per acre 1.71 residents Park Land(new) * 3.14 acres perthousand $61,000 $150,000 per acre 2.46 residents square feet per square foot of Recreation Centers 0.49 0.59 $225 $670 2.98 per person building Police Buildings square feet Residential 0.26 0.33 per person per square foot of Police Buildings square feet per $333 $660 1.98 building Nonresidential 0.06 0.09 vehicle trip Fire Buildings-Residential 0.44 0.52 square feet per person $535 864 per square foot of 1.61 Fire Buildings- square feet building Nonresidential 0.46 0.52 perjob Fire Apparatus, Communications& $61.98 $74.69 per person 1.21 Equipment-Residential Fire Apparatus, Communications& $64.46 $73.70 perjob 1.14 Equipment Nonresidential * In the 2019 study,land foradditional parks was only 1%of the growth cost and no standard was documented. In the 2022 study,land foradditional parks is 26%of the growth costfor parks&recreation. DP Guthrie LLC 36 AD#308122AD# LEGAL NOTICE SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO.22-2004 An ordinance accepting the 2022 Development Impact Fees Study;adopting an amended capital improvements plan;repealing and replacing Meridian City Code section 10-7-12(E)(2)concerning development impact fees; voiding conflicting ordinances and resolutions; and providing an effective date of February 1,2023.The full text of the ordinance is available in the City Clerk's Office at Meridian City Hall,33 E.Broadway Ave.,Meridian,Idaho. Impact Fee Schedule Effective February 1,2023 Residential Square Feet of Climate- Park and Police Fire Total Fees Controlled Floor Area Per Recreation Facilities Facilities Individual Dwelling Unit Facilities 1,200orless $1,946.00 $190.00 $470.00 $2,606.00 1,201 to 1,700 $3,006.00 $294.00 $726.00 $4,026.00 1,701 to 2,500 $4,119.00 $402.00 $995.00 $5,516.00 2,501 to 3,200 $4,935.00 $482.00 $1,192.00 $6,609.00 3,201 or more $5,544.00 $542.00 $1,339.00 $7,425.00 For a building with more than one dwelling unit,the floor area per individual dwelling unit shall be calculated by dividing the total climate-controlled floor area of the building,less ancillary building space,by the total number of dwelling units in the building.Ancillary floor area includes community rooms,fitness centers,management offices,and maintenance areas. Nonresidential Per Square Foot of Building Park and Recreation Police Fire Total Facilities Facilities Facilities Fees Commercial(includes all $0.00 $1.23 $1.29 $2.52 buildings in a shopping center; all stand-alone retail buildings; and all restaurants and bars) All Other $0.00 $0.19 $0.96 $1.15 November 27,2022 308122 ADVERTISING PROOF IDAHO PRESS MER7Dlj%W YRE55 c/o ISj Payment Processing Center Local News Wc.rrti Holdir. my m Emmett PO BOX 1570, BOISEWEEKLY WMessenger Pocatello,ID 83204 /ndex Ph. (541) 331-6473 Fax: (907)452-5054 ACCOUNTBILLING DATE: NO: 11/23/22 21410 1 MERIDIAN, CITY OF 33 E. BROADWAYAVENUE MERIDIAN, ID 83642 AD# DESCRIPTION START STOP TIMES AMOUNT 308122 ORD 22-2004 11/27/22 11/27/22 1 $104.67 Payments: Date Method Card Type Last 4 Digits Check Amount Discount: $0.00 Gross:$104.67 Surcharge: $0.00 Paid Amount:$0.00 Credits: $0.00 Amount Due:$104.67 We Appreciate Your Business! 308122 Exhibit A.9 LIST OF IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS The following table lists existing tools which will be utilized to implement the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan. These tools are already approved through City ordinance, but may require updates to most effectively implement this Plan. Meridian's online City Code is maintained by a third party and is available via the City's website. ToolsList of Implementation Tool Link City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual (2016) https://meridiancity.org/designreview Meridian City Code(2019) https://meridiancity.org/CityCode Unified Development Code(Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances,Title 11 of Meridian City Code) (2019) https:Hmeridiancity.org/UDC LIST OF PLANS AND STUDIES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The following table lists plans that are adopted by reference by incorporated in the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan by reference.The most current lment dates are reflected-on this table. Sites listed without a www.meridiancity.org domain are not maintained or operated by the City. IncorporateList of Plans and Studies Plan Lead Agency Link Meridian Arts Commission Strategic Plan (2019)* Meridian Arts Commission https://meridiancity.org/mac/ Meridian Environmental Programs Plan (2019)* City of Meridian https://meridiancity.org/environmental/ Welcome to Meridian Signage Plan (2019)* City of Meridian https://meridiancity.org/WelcomePlan Communities in Motion 20402.0 2050 (2022) COMPASS https://meridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning Existing Conditions Report(2022)* City of Meridian https://meridiancity.org/comgplan Meridian Water Master Plan-(20W(2025)* City of Meridian https://meridiancity.org/WataLMEaummary Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan (2018) Ada County Highway District https://meridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning Valley Connect 2.0(2018) Valley Regional Transit https://meridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning Ada County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan f2917r(2022) Ada County https:Hmeridiancity.org/AdaHazardPlan www.meridiancity.org/compplan List of Plans By Reference Plan Lead Agency Link City of Meridian Collection System Master Plan (2617) City of Meridian httl2s:Hmeridiancity.org/CollectionMPSummary (2022)* City of Meridian Strategic Plan 2020- City of Meridian httl2s:Hmeridiancity.org/StrategicPlan 2025)* Meridian Parks and Recreation Master Plan f26153(2023)* City of Meridian httl2s:Hmeridiancity.org/masterplan Downtown Meridian Street Cross-section Master Plan City of Meridian httl2s:Hmeridiancity.org/StreetPlan (2014)* Meridian Historic Preservation Plan (2014)* Meridian Historic Preservation https:Hmeridiancity.org/HistoricPlan Commission Downtown Meridian Neighborhood Transportation Ada County Highway District/City of https:Hmeridiancity.org/transportation Pedestrian and-Bieyc+e Plan f263-2j 2f 024)* Meridian Eastern Treasure Valley Electric Plan (2012) Idaho Power https:Hmeridiancity.org/ElectricPlan Airport-Overland Corridor Study(2011) ACHD and City of Nampa https:Hmeridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning Meridian Water Conservation Plan-(2%4 2( 023)* City of Meridian httl2s:Hmeridiancity.org/water/conservation Destination Downtown (2010) Meridian Development Corporation https://meridiancity.org/downtown Meridian Pathways Master Plan (2010)* City of Meridian https:Hmeridiancity.org/pathways Meridian Rail-With-Trail Action Plan (2010)* City of Meridian https:Hmeridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning ACHD Transportation and Land Use Integration Plan Ada County Highway District https:Hmeridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning (2009) US-20/26 Corridor Study(2006) Idaho)Transportation Department httl2s:Hmeridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning (ITDDowntown Meridian Transportation Management Plan Ada County Highway District/City of https://meridiancity.org/TransportationPlanning (2005)* Meridian Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (2007)* City of Meridian https:Hmeridiancity.orq/TMISAP Destination Downtown (201-0) Meridian Development Corporation httvs!#fnefi(!l6ane*tv.efa awntown Fields Subarea Plan (2021)* City of Meridian https://meridiancity.org/Fields Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Plan (2018)* City of Meridian Link EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Ada County Link Fee Study Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Ada County Link Fee Study 2022 Development Impact Fees Studer City of Meridian Link * Or the most recent version of the plan/study, if applicable. www.meridiancity.org/compplan Exhibit A.10 APPENDIX A. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Area of City Impact-Also known as the City's planning area.It refers to the Capital Improvements Plan, as the Comprehensive is the land area surrounding the limits of each City, negotiated Financial Plan (CFP). between each individual City and the county in which it lies. Each City has comprehensive planning authority for its Area of City Compatible- Land uses capable of existing together without Impact, but until annexation occurs,zoning and development conflict or ill effects. entitlement is handled by the county. Conditional Use -A utilization of land having characteristics Buffer-An area within a property or site, generally adjacent to such that it may be allowed in a particular zoning district only and parallel with the property line, either consisting of existing after review by the Commission and Council, and granting of ~- natural vegetation or created by the use of trees, shrubs, berms approval imposing conditions deemed necessary to make the o and/or fences and designed to limit views and sounds from proposed use compatible with other uses in the area. the development tract to adjacent parties and vice versa.Also 0 commonly used when describing a transitional use, typically Conditional Use Permit-Permit issued to allow a conditional use. office, between residential and commercial or industrial. Q Cross-Access Agreement- An agreement between adjacent x_ Building Code - Legislative regulations that prescribe the property owners in which internal connections are provided materials, requirements, and methods to be used in the between parking areas in order to improve traffic flow on the a construction, rehabilitation, maintenance,and repair of buildings. street by minimizing the number of access points needed. Q The City of Meridian, per state statue, has adopted the Uniform Cross-access agreements are typically obtained incrementally — Building Code(UBC),developed by the International Conference as a condition of approval for new development.The first one of Building Officials. to develop will be required to make an irrevocable offer of cross-access to the adjacent parcel and must design the parking Capital Improvement Program - A process of identifying lot to accommodate the access. When the adjacent owner and budgeting for the public facilities that a jurisdiction will wishes to develop,they will be conditioned to reciprocate with need to construct in order to serve existing and anticipated a similar cross-access agreement and complete the access. development. Capital improvement programming is typically o done in five-year increments with annual updates. A Capital Density-The rate of residential development intensity,generally U Improvement Program (CIP) must address the type of project, described as a ratio of residential units per acre of land. the location of the project, the cost of the project, the source of funds to finance the project, the agency or department Density Bonus-Incentives given for dedication of land to the responsible for the project, and the time frame for completion public for parks, schools, or other public facilities. o of the project.Capital Improvement Programs are a primary tool of most growth management programs.The City of Meridian Employment Area -An employment area provides a job and U employer base large enough to generate agglomeration of www.meridiancity.org/comppIan ideas and innovation, are dense enough to promote a cohesive factors that determine whether or not a substance is hazardous: and integrated environment with efficient transportation, ignitability(i.e.,flammable), reactivity, corrosiveness,and toxicity and include a focus on supporting Meridian families with family-wage jobs. The minimum size of an employment area Impact Fees-Are one-time payments used to construct system is 25 acres, it must provide 1,000 jobs with at least 70% that improvements that serve multiple development projects or are neither retail or service, and include a minimum of 10 even the entire jurisdiction. By bay, impact fees can only be employers. Employment area boundaries align with COMPASS used for capital improvements, not operating or maintenance traffic analysis area (TAZ) boundaries. Other verifiable data costs. Impact fees are subject to legal standards that satisfy may be used in substitute for developing areas. three key tests: need, benefit, and proportionality. Fair Housing Act— Fair Housing Title VIII of the Civil Rights Implementation Plan—The implementation plan will serve as a Act of 1968, enacted to prohibit housing discrimination based roadmap for the City's success over a period of five years.It will T on race, color, religion, national origin, handicap, sex, and/or also serve as a tool to communicate the City's intentions to the o familial status. community, focus the direction of its financial resources and employees, and ensure that short-term goals and objectives N Fire Flow—The minimum number of gallons per minute that are met in a timely fashion to ensure attainment of the City's are needed to fight a fire in a structure, for two continuous overall vision. Q hours through fire plugs in the near proximity of the structure. x Fire flow requirements are established by the national Uniform Infill Development — Development on vacant parcels, or t Fire Code and are a factor in the City's Insurance Services redevelopment of existing parcels to a higher and better use Q Office (ISO) rating. that is surrounded by developed property within the City of Q Meridian. Floodway— Drainage and irrigation channels and adjacent land areas that must be reserved to discharge flood waters Last Mile—the last leg of a transportation movement from a cL from a 100-year flood. Development is prohibited in this area. transportation hub, such as a bus stop, to final destinations likes places of employment or residence. Solutions vary, but Green Building—Also known as green construction or sustainable examples include various ride sharing systems such as car, building, is the practice of creating structures and using bicycle, or scooters, and on-demand services. a processes that are environmentally responsible and resource- E efficient throughout a building's life-cycle: from siting to Linear Open Space — This type of open space is longer than �j design, construction, operation, maintenance, renovation, wide, typically publicly accessible, generally found along and demolition. canals, creeks, or linking pedestrian-oriented points of interest, and includes tree canopy and other active or passive natural .(D- Hazardous Waste—Waste that poses substantial or potential features offset from multiuser connectivity such as pathways. ]�i threats to public health or the environment. There are four 0 ftZ www.meridiancity.org/comppIan Placemaking — The process and philosophy that capitalizes Walkable — Development that contains a comprehensive on a local community's assets, inspiration, and potential,with network of sidewalks and multiuse pathways. Development the intention of creating quality public spaces that promote tends to be compact, and diverse, providing varied and plentiful people's health, happiness, and well-being. destinations for walking and cycling; destinations tend to be within 1/4 of a mile from dwellings without crossing arterial-arterial Public Facilities and Services—See Urban Services. intersections. Environment is safe and aesthetically pleasing, with open space interspersed throughout development. Quality of Life—Quality of life refers to the day living enhanced by wholesome food and clean air and water, enjoyment of unfettered open spaces and bodies of water, conservation of wildlife and natural resources, security from crime, and protection from radiation and toxic substances. It may also be used as a measure of the energy and power a person is o endowed with that enable him or her to enjoy life and prevail over life's challenges irrespective of the handicaps he or she N may have. ° 0 Reclaimed Water — Former wastewater (sewage) that has x been treated to remove solids and certain impurities, and then used in sustainable landscaping irrigation or to recharge Q groundwater aquifers.This is done for sustainability and water Q conservation, rather than discharging the treated wastewater to surface waters such as rivers and oceans. Sometimes called recycled water. a� Urban Service Planning Area—Priority planning area where City of Meridian sewer and water facilities and most other services and utilities are available or planned in officially adopted plans. a E Urban Services—Services provided by the City of Meridian or U established jurisdictions within the City of Meridian, including City of Meridian water, fire protection by Meridian City-Rural Fire District, City of Meridian parks and recreation facilities, City of Meridian police protection, public sanitary sewers owned by the City of Meridian, public transit, schools, storm drainage >_ ftZ facilities, and urban standard streets and roads. U www.meridiancity.org/comppIan This page left intentionally blank— www.meridiancity.org/compplan Exhibit 6 Supplemental Documents Exhibit B.1 E IDIAN:--- IDAH �. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Work Session From: William L. M. Nary, City Attorney and Meeting Date: June 17, 2025 Kurt Starman, Deputy City Attorney Presenter: Kurt Starman, Deputy City Attorney Estimated Time: 15 minutes Topic: Consider Approving Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements with Ada County and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Concerning Countywide Development Impact Fees Recommended Council Action: Consider approving Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements ("Agreements") with Ada County ("County") and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District ("District") concerning the capital improvements plans ("CIPs") that are necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. Background: The County and District wish to adopt countywide development impact fees to partially fund coroner-, jail-, and EMS-related capital improvements associated with new development. The proposed fees,which total $750 per single-family housing unit,would be similar to the development impact fees collected by the Ada County Highway District. Unlike ACHD, however, the County and District cannot collect development impact fees within the incorporated cities without each city's participation. In order to proceed, every incorporated city must: (1) enter into intergovernmental agreements with the County and District; (2) adopt the CIPs; and (3) adopt an ordinance. Based on that,the City Council has discussed a four-step implementation plan, as follows: 1. Enter into Agreements with the County and District that only address the CIPs at this time. The Agreements do not require the City to adopt the CIPs, nor do they require the City to adopt countywide development impact fees. Rather,the City would simply agree to consider the CIPs. 2. If the Agreements are approved, the City would then consider the CIPs in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. The basic steps are as follows: a. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee would forward its written comments to the City in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. b. The Planning and Zoning Commission would conduct a public hearing concerning the CIPs and forward its recommendation to the City Council. c. The City Council would conduct a public hearing and make its determination. If adopted, the CIPs would be added to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City would not require an application fee to process the Comprehensive Plan amendment given the City's direct involvement. 3. If the City adopts the CIPs, it would then pause until all the other cities have adopted (a) the CIPs and (b) the ordinances necessary to collect countywide development impact fees. 4. If all the other cities timely adopt the CIPs and necessary ordinances,the City would then consider adopting an ordinance to collect countywide development impact fees.A successor intergovernmental agreement would also be necessary at that time.As noted above, however, the City would not be obligated to adopt countywide development impact fees. Approval of the Agreements would be consistent with "step one" of the implementation plan. The City Council has been receptive to working with the County and District on countywide development impact fees but has noted some reservations about a coroner-related fee, since coroner-related facilities are not explicitly delineated in Idaho Code section 67-8203(24)(0. If the City Council determines it does not wish to consider the CIP concerning coroner-related facilities, it is recommended that the City Council refrain from acting on the Agreements at this time so that staff can make modifications as needed. The Agreements could then be placed on a future consent agenda for final action. Agreements included on the agenda as potential action items: - Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements - Ada County Emergency Medical Services District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for District System Improvements Exhibit B.2 APPENDIX A. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Area of City Impact-Also known as the City's planning area. It The City of Meridian refers to the Capital Improvments Plan, is the land area surrounding the limits of each City, negotiated as the Comprensive Financial Plan (CFP). between each individual City and the county in which it lies. Each City has comprehensive planning authority for its Area of City Compatible- Land uses capable of existing together without Impact, but until annexation occurs,zoning and development conflict or ill effects. entitlement is handled by the county. Conditional Use -A utilization of land having characteristics Buffer-An area within a property or site, generally adjacent to such that it may be allowed in a particular zoning district only and parallel with the property line, either consisting of existing after review by the Commission and Council, and granting of ~- natural vegetation or created by the use of trees, shrubs, berms approval imposing conditions deemed necessary to make the o and/or fences and designed to limit views and sounds from proposed use compatible with other uses in the area. the development tract to adjacent parties and vice versa.Also 0 commonly used when describing a transitional use, typically Conditional Use Permit-Permit issued to allow a conditional use. office, between residential and commercial or industrial. Q Cross-Access Agreement- An agreement between adjacent x_ Building Code - Legislative regulations that prescribe the property owners in which internal connections are provided materials, requirements, and methods to be used in the between parking areas in order to improve traffic flow on the a construction, rehabilitation, maintenance,and repair of buildings. street by minimizing the number of access points needed. Q The City of Meridian, per state statue, has adopted the Uniform Cross-access agreements are typically obtained incrementally — Building Code(UBC),developed by the International Conference as a condition of approval for new development.The first one of Building Officials. to develop will be required to make an irrevocable offer of IL cross-access to the adjacent parcel and must design the parking > Capital Improvement Plan PrsgFUm-A process of identifying lot to accommodate the access. When the adjacent owner and budgeting for the public facilities that a jurisdiction will wishes to develop,they will be conditioned to reciprocate with need to construct in order to serve existing and anticipated a similar cross-access agreement and complete the access. development. Capital improvement Plans are o is typically done in five-year increments with annual updates. Density-The rate of residential development intensity, generally U A Capital Improvement Plan Program (CIP) must address the described as a ratio of residential units per acre of land. � type of project, the location of the project, the cost of the project,the source of funds to finance the project,the agency or Density Bonus-Incentives given for dedication of land to the department responsible for the project, and the time frame for public for parks, schools, or other public facilities. o completion of the project.Capital Improvement Plans Programs are a primary tool of most growth management programs. Employment Area -An employment area provides a job and U employer base large enough to generate agglomeration of www.meridiancity.org/comppIan ideas and innovation, are dense enough to promote a cohesive factors that determine whether or not a substance is hazardous: and integrated environment with efficient transportation, ignitability(i.e.,flammable), reactivity, corrosiveness,and toxicity and include a focus on supporting Meridian families with family-wage jobs. The minimum size of an employment area Impact Fee-Are one-time payments used to construct system is 25 acres, it must provide 1,000 jobs with at least 70% that improvements that serve multiple development projects or are neither retail or service, and include a minimum of 10 even the entire jurisdiction. By lay, impact fees can only be employers. Employment area boundaries align with COMPASS used for capital improvements, not operating or maintenance traffic analysis area (TAZ) boundaries. Other verifiable data costs. Impact fees are subject to legal standards that satisfy may be used in substitute for developing areas. three key tests: need, benefit, and rLooportionality. Fair Housing Act— Fair Housing Title VIII of the Civil Rights Implementation Plan—The implementation plan will serve as Act of 1968, enacted to prohibit housing discrimination based roadmap for the City's success over a period of five years. It wi T on race, color, religion, national origin, handicap, sex, and/or also serve as a tool to communicate the City's intentions to th, o familial status. community, focus the direction of its financial resources an( employees, and ensure that short-term goals and objective N Fire Flow—The minimum number of gallons per minute that are met in a timely fashion to ensure attainment of the City' ° are needed to fight a fire in a structure, for two continuous overall vision. O hours through fire plugs in the near proximity of the structure. X Fire flow requirements are established by the national Uniform Infill Development — Development on vacant parcels, o Fire Code and are a factor in the City's Insurance Services redevelopment of existing parcels to a higher and better us, Q Office (ISO) rating. that is surrounded by developed property within the City c Q Meridian. Floodway— Drainage and irrigation channels and adjacent land areas that must be reserved to discharge flood waters Last Mile—the last leg of a transportation movement from , cL from a 100-year flood. Development is prohibited in this area. transportation hub, such as a bus stop, to final destination likes places of employment or residence. Solutions vary, bu Green Building—Also known as green construction or sustainable examples include various ride sharing systems such as cai building, is the practice of creating structures and using bicycle, or scooters, and on-demand services. a processes that are environmentally responsible and resource- E efficient throughout a building's life-cycle: from siting to Linear Open Space — This type of open space is longer that �j design, construction, operation, maintenance, renovation, wide, typically publicly accessible, generally found alonc and demolition. canals, creeks, or linking pedestrian-oriented points of interest and includes tree canopy and other active or passive naturz a) Hazardous Waste—Waste that poses substantial or potential features offset from multiuser connectivity such as pathway ]�.i threats to public health or the environment. There are four >_ ftZ www.meridiancity.org/comppIan Placemaking — The process and philosophy that capitalizes Walkable — Development that contains a comprehensive on a local community's assets, inspiration, and potential, with network of sidewalks and multiuse pathways. Development the intention of creating quality public spaces that promote tends to be compact, and diverse, providing varied and plentiful people's health, happiness, and well-being. destinations for walking and cycling; destinations tend to be within 1/4 of a mile from dwellings without crossing arterial-arterial Public Facilities and Services—See Urban Services. intersections. Environment is safe and aesthetically pleasing, with open space interspersed throughout development. Quality of Life—Quality of life refers to the day living enhanced by wholesome food and clean air and water, enjoyment of unfettered open spaces and bodies of water, conservation of wildlife and natural resources, security from crime, and protection from radiation and toxic substances. It may also be used as a measure of the energy and power a person is o endowed with that enable him or her to enjoy life and prevail over life's challenges irrespective of the handicaps he or she N may have. ° 0 Reclaimed Water — Former wastewater (sewage) that has x been treated to remove solids and certain impurities, and then used in sustainable landscaping irrigation or to recharge Q groundwater aquifers.This is done for sustainability and water Q conservation, rather than discharging the treated wastewater to surface waters such as rivers and oceans. Sometimes called recycled water. IL a� Urban Service Planning Area—Priority planning area where City of Meridian sewer and water facilities and most other services and utilities are available or planned in officially adopted plans. a E Urban Services—Services provided by the City of Meridian or U established jurisdictions within the City of Meridian, including City of Meridian water, fire protection by Meridian City-Rural Fire District, City of Meridian parks and recreation facilities, City of Meridian police protection, public sanitary sewers owned by the City of Meridian, public transit, schools, storm drainage >_ ftZ facilities, and urban standard streets and roads. U www.meridiancity.org/comppIan This page left intentionally blank— www.meridiancity.org/compplan W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 25-2101: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-11 Concerning Drive-Through Establishments; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2101 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-4-3-11 CONCERNING DRIVE-THROUGH ESTABLISHMENTS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511(2)(b), the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered the comprehensive plan and other evidence gathered through the public hearing process and recommended that the Meridian City Council adopt the following amendments to the Meridian Unified Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City has complied with the notice and hearing procedures for amendment of the Unified Development Code as set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6509 and Unified Development Code section 11-5A-6; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems it to be in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of its citizens to incorporate the following changes to the Unified Development Code. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-11 be amended as follows: A. A drive-through establishment shall be deemed an accessory use where the drive-through facility(including stacking lanes, speaker and/or order area,pick up windows, and exit lanes) is: 1. Not within three hun re Farther than three hundred feet (300') feet of another drive thfough ,from a residential district, use, or dwelling; . or-and 2. Not the conversion of a tier 1 drive-through to another tiered drive-through in subsection (C) below; Separated by an arterial street from a-By other- drive through f4cil;�y- residential distfiet or-existing r-esidenee-,-or-and 3. Not within the O-T zoning district-.Land 4. Designed in accord with subsection(D)below. Otherwise, a conditional use permit is required. B. All establishments providing drive-through service shall identify the stacking lane, menu and speaker locationLss)(if applicable), and window locationLss,)on the site plan submitted with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-DRIVE-THROUGHS PAGE I OF 5 certificate of zoning compliance and/or the—conditional use permit. Speakers are prohibited in the O-T zoning district. C. Types of Drive-throughs. 1. Tier 1. A drive-through associated with a financial institution, automated teller machine(ATM),pharmacy, launda and dry cleaning,restaurant limited to online and mobile ordering only, or other comparable uses, as determined by the Director. 2. Tier 2.A drive-through associated with a restaurant,limited to a designated order area, a stacking lane, and a pick-up window. 3. Tier 3. A drive-through associated with a restaurant providing either two (2) or more designated order areas, two (2) or more stacking lanes, or two (2) or more pick-up windows. ED. AFor all drive-throughs, a site plan shall be submitted that demonstrates safe pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation on the site and between adjacent properties. At a minimum the plan shall demonstrate compliance with the following standards: 1. Stacking lanes shall have sufficient capacity to prevent obstruction of driveways,drive aisles, and the public right-of-way by patrons. Designated pick-up or pull-forward parking stalls may be required if the decision-making body determines that the stacking capacity is insufficient. 2. The stacking lane shall be a separate lane from the circulation lanes needed for access and parking, except stacking lanes may provide access to designated employee parking. 3. The stacking lane shall not be located within A)twenty feet f2OD of any residential district, use, or dwellings ' . 4. Any stacking lane greater than one hundred feet 100Dfeet in length shall provide for an escape lane. Each stacking lane and designated escape lane shall have a minimum width of ten feet(10'). 5. The site sheushall be designed so that the drive-through is visible from a public street, or other readily accessible public space, for surveillance purposes. 6. The minimum stacking lane capacity shall be six (6)vehicles per lane for tier 2 or tier 3, and two (2)vehicles per lane for tier 1. 7. All drive-throughs shall submit a queuing exhibit demonstrating vehicle stacking-per the lane capacity standards in subsection (D)(6). Each vehicle space within the stacking lane shall be based on a vehicle length of twenty. f�20'). UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-DRIVE-THROUGHS PAGE 2 OF 5 Section 2. That all other provisions of the Unified Development Code remain unchanged. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 18th day of November, 2025. APPROVED by the Council President of the City of Meridian, Idaho,this 18th day of November, 2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: By Liz Strader, Council Vice President 11-18-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 11-18-2025 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-DRIVE-THROUGHS PAGE 3 OF 5 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: William L. M.Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. r William L. M.Nary UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-DRIVE-THROUGHS PAGE 4 OF 5 SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2101 An ordinance amending Meridian City Code as Codified at Title 11, Chapter 4, Specific Use Standards concerning drive-through establishments; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-DRIVE-THROUGHS PAGE 5 OF 5 W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 25-2102: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-12, Concerning Accessory Dwellings; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2102 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-4-3-12, CONCERNING ACCESSORY DWELLINGS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511(2)(b), the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered the comprehensive plan and other evidence gathered through the public hearing process and recommended that the Meridian City Council adopt the following amendments to the Meridian Unified Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City has complied with the notice and hearing procedures for amendment of the Unified Development Code as set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6509 and Unified Development Code section 11-5A-6; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems it to be in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of its citizens to incorporate the following changes to the Unified Development Code. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-12 be amended as follows: 11-4-3-12.—Dwelling,shy accessory. The following standards shall apply to the building, placement, and maintenance of an accessory dwelling unit: A. Permittea Limit One. The property owner shall build,place, or maintain no more than gone (1) seeend accessory dwelling unit:s ,.o,.,, hied on the same per property in eenjunetion with and elear-ly suber-dinme to a single family dwelling. B.Accessory to primary dwelling An accessory dwelling unit shall be located only on the same property as, in conjunction with, and clearly subordinate to, a primary dwelling_ C.Permit Required. The property owner shall obtain city permitting approval for an accessory dwelling unit prior to building, placing, or maintaining an accessory dwelling unit on any property- &.D. Owner o Record ee .v4e�. To er-eate and maintain a o nda-F ,dwelling, ri �t,o pf-epeAy owner-shall reside on the pr-epeAy for-more than six (6) meaths in anytwel month period. The appheant for-a seeendar-y dwelling tmit shall demenst-r-a4e that either- the single family dwelling or-the seeendafy tmit is eeeWied by the owner-of the OCTOBER 2025 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-ACCESSORY DWELLINGS PAGE I OF 3 Ownership of the primary dwelling shall be confirmed through Ada County records. The accessory Sew dwelling units shall not be subdivided or otherwise segregated in ownership from the single family rip marX dwelling wit. GE. Maximum size. Seeend An accessory dwelling units shall be limited to a maximum of nine hundred (900) square feet or no more than fifty(50)percent of the primary dwelling, whichever is less, and no more than two (2)bedrooms constructed in accord with the adopted residential building code. DF. Location. The seeon :y An accessory dwelling unit may be located within or attached to the primary dwelling; a detached structure; or above�er-beside, or within a detached structure, such as a gar-ago A Ddetached seeend accessory dwelling units shall be located to the side or rear of a primary dwelling. EQ. Parking. Required parking for the a property with an accessory dwelling unit shall be as set forth in Section 11-3C-6, Table 11-3C-6 of this Title for single-family dwellings, as determined by the total number of bedrooms on the property. The conversion of a covered parking area(garage/carport) into an seeendaf accessory dwelling unit is not allowed unless the required parking can be provided elsewhere on site. FH. Separate Eentrance. Both the primary dwelling unit and the accessory dwelling unit shall each have at least one (1) exterior egress door; no openings are allowed between dwellingunits.nits. Only e ( ) entr nee deer-of either-the s gle family dwelling or the seeoadar-y dwelling tinit shall be leeated f4eing any one (1) street. 61. Design. The seeendar-y accessory dwelling unit shall be _generally consistent in design with the single fami4y primary dwelling, including roof pitch, siding, color, materials, and window treatments. FIJ. p Prohibited dwellin. N4aa f?etufed and mobile 1,,,mes, an 4eefeatkm Only a building constructed on a foundation shall be used as an accessory dwelling unit. A vehicles or tent shall be prohibited for use as seeendafy an accessory dwelling unit. IK. Number of occupants. The total number of occupants in both the single rip •mart' dwelling and the seeend accessory dwelling shall not exceed the maximum number established for a "family", as defined in Chapter 1, Article A, "definitions", of this Title. L. Utilities. An accessory dwelling unit shall be connected to City water and sewer systems, and shall obtain solid waste collection services as required within the City. The property owner shall be responsible for connecting an accessory dwelling unit to municipal water and sewer services, and for obtaining solid waste collection services. M. Address required. An accessory dwelling unit shall have its own separate address from the primary residence. The property owner shall be responsible for obtaining an address for an accessory dwelling unit. N. Responsible party. The owner of any property where an accessory dwellingunit nit is built, placed or maintained shall be responsible for compliance with all laws that apply to such dwelling, including this section. OCTOBER 2025 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-ACCESSORY DWELLINGS PAGE 2 OF 3 Section 2. That all other provisions of the Unified Development Code remain unchanged. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 18th day of November, 2025. APPROVED by the Council President of the City of Meridian,Idaho,this 18th day of November, 2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: By T ke r�•_-_cil'Eresidrarr Chris Johnson, City Cleric 11-18-2025 QtZ Sr�rGc1--r 11-18-2025 co(-Lv-)cil Vice PresOeh-- CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: William L.M.Nary, City Attorney of the city of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. William L. M.Nary SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2102 An Ordinance amending Meridian City Code as Codified at Title 11, Concerning Accessory Dwellings; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. OCTOBER 2025 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ORDINANCE-ACCESSORY DWELLINGS PAGE 3 OF 3