HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-08-04 AgendaPacket-Transportation Commission Meeting-August 4, 2025 3.30 PM
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING
City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho
Monday, August 04, 2025 at 3:30 PM
All materials presented at public meetings become property of the City of Meridian. Anyone desiring accommodation
for disabilities should contact the City Clerk's Office at 208-888-4433 at least 48 hours prior to the public meeting.
Agenda
VIRTUAL MEETING INSTRUCTIONS
To join the meeting online: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81095276712
Or join by phone: 1-253-215-8782
Webinar ID: 810 9527 6712
ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE
_____ David Ballard _____ Kelly Bruner, Ex-Officio – ACHD
_____ Zachary Shoemaker _____ Austin Miller, Ex-Officio – COMPASS
_____ Ryan Lancaster _____ Miranda Carson, Ex-Officio – WASD
_____ Walter Steed _____ Kate Dahl, Ex-Officio – VRT
_____ Tracy Hopkins _____ Justin Price, Ex-Officio - ITD
_____ Stephen Lewis _____ Sgt. Tara Smith – Police
_____ Jared Smith _____ Tishra Murray – Legal
_____ Tom LeClaire _____ Hether Hill – Community Development
_____ Lilly Miller
ADOPTION OF AGENDA [ACTION ITEM]
APPROVAL OF MINUTES [ACTION ITEM]
1. Approval of Minutes - June 2, 2025
OLD BUSINESS [ACTION ITEM]
2. Transportation Project Updates
1
NEW BUSINESS [ACTION ITEM]
3. Amendments to Title 11 - Unified Development Code - Bill Parsons
4. Centrepoint Commercial Traffic Circulation Safety
5. Commission Bylaws Discussion - Ali Breshears (City Attorney's Office)
6. Canyon County Transit Day Survey Data - Kate Dahl
7. September Field Trip
8. Ex-Officio Updates
9. Staff Communications
FUTURE MEETING TOPICS
10. ACHD Master Street Map Changes – Arterial Corridor Preservation (Cherry Lane)
11. Capital Investments Citizens Advisory Committee (CICAC) Update
NEXT MEETING - DATE TBD
ADJOURNMENT
2
Meeting Minutes
Meridian Transportation Commission
Monday, June 2, 2025
Council Chambers – Meridian City Hall 33 East Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho
Roll Call
MEMBERS
☒David Ballard ☐Walter Steed ☒Zach Shoemaker
☒Ryan Lancaster ☐Stephen Lewis ☒Tracy Hopkins
☒Jared Smith ☒Tom LeClaire ☒Lilly Miller
EX-OFFICIO
☒Kelly Bruner (ACHD) ☒Lila Klopfenstein (COMPASS) ☒Miranda Carson (WASD)
☒Kate Dahl (VRT) ☒Mark Wasdahl (ITD)
OTHERS PRESENT
☒Cpl. Trevor Weitzel (Police) ☒ Tishra Murray (Legal) ☒Hether Hill (Comm. Dev.)
Adoption of the Agenda
No changes were made to the agenda. Motion to approve by Commissioner Lancaster, 2nd by
Commissioner Ballard - all ayes.
Approval of Minutes
1. May 5, 2025
Motion to approve as amended by Commissioner Hopkins, 2nd by Commissioner Lancaster - all
ayes.
Old Business Items
2. Transportation Projects Update – Hether Hill
Ms. Hill began on Page 6 of the packet and recommended the Commission review the updates
provided in bolded text through page 13. Ms. Hill highlighted ACHD’s Ustick, Black Cat to Ten Mile
project, as well as updates on segments of the Meridian Downtown Pedestrian Improvements
Project.
New Business Items
3. SH-69, Kuna to Meridian Corridor Traffic Study – Mark Wasdahl (ITD) and Leah
Kelsey (DKS Associates)
Mr. Wasdahl and Ms. Kelsey provided a PowerPoint presentation on the SH -69, Kuna to
Meridian Corridor Traffic Study. They discussed the vision for the project which includes:
widening SH-69 to seven lanes between Overland and Kuna roads; widening SH-69 to five lanes
between Kuna Road and Orchard Avenue; installing a new continuous raised median with
access allowed at mile and 1/2-mile intersections; all other access onto SH-69 will be right-in
and right-out and adding a 10-foot multi-use pathway on each side.
3
Item 1.
4. ACHD Queuing Analysis – Memo from ACHD
Kelly Bruner with ACHD introduced the agenda item. Page 14 of the packet includes a
memorandum prepared by Christy Little, Development Services Manager with ACHD. Attached
to the memo is an example of a queueing analysis. There was limited discussion amongst the
Commission and staff.
5. Ex-Officio Updates
Lila Klopfenstein – The final public comment period for the Let’s Ride Treasure Valley PEL Study
is June 6th through June 29th; announced her final day with COMPASS is June 12th.
Kate Dahl – Service changes went into effect today, June 2nd; work is beginning on June 9th at
Main Street Station in downtown Boise; VRT will be offering free fares for the upcoming Post
Malone concert, which has made possible by BSU; Canyon County Transit Day and yielded 220
participants.
Miranda Carson – summer school started today, June 2nd, and WASD is actively planning for the
next school year.
Kelly Bruner – chip season is underway for ACHD; Five Year Plan draft will be available in July for
public comment.
Mark Wasdahl – Nothing additional to add following the ITD presentation.
Cpl. Trevor Weitzel – Police has a lot to cover in the upcoming months as it relates to events.
6. Staff Communications
Staff Communications began on page 27 of the packet. Ms. Hill led the discussion and highlighted
the email correspondence included in the packet, as well as a verbal update of email
correspondence shared with the citizen on June 2 nd. There was discussion between the
Commission, Ex-Officio staff with ACHD and WASD. The Commission deferred to Ms. Hill to
maintain communication with the citizen.
FUTURE MEETING TOPICS
7. ACHD Master Street Map Changes – Arterial Corridor Preservation (Cherry Lane)
8. Capital Investments Citizens Advisory Committee (CICAC) Update
9. Transportation Commission Bylaws
10. ACHD Queuing Analysis
Motion by Commission Hopkins, 2nd by Commission Ballard to cancel the regularly scheduled
July 7th meeting – all ayes.
Next Meeting Date: August 4, 2025
Adjournment; 5:05pm – Motion by Commissioner Hopkins, 2nd by Commissioner Ballard - all
ayes.
4
Item 1.
(AUDIO RECORDING AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST)
APPROVED:
_______________________ _______________
WALTER STEED, CHAIR DATE
ATTEST:
________________________ _______________
CHRIS JOHNSON (City Clerk) DATE
5
Item 1.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
From: Hether Hill, Coordination Planner Meeting Date: August 4, 2025
Topic: Transportation Project Updates
Below is a summary/update on some of the transportation and roadway City Staff has been involved
with recently. This is not an exhaustive list, but rather highlights some of the more important activities
that have recently transpired (or are about to occur) in the transportation realm . Staff will be at the
Transportation Commission meeting to discuss some of these topics in more detail. Please feel free to
contact staff should you have any comments, concerns, or questions on any of these projects. New
information is in bold.
KEY ACHD PROJECTS
ACHD Integrated Five-Year Work Program: The adopted 2025-2029 IFYWP can be found here:
https://engage.achdidaho.org/integrated-five-year-work-plan-ifywp-2025-
2029?utm_campaign=&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govDelivery The IFYWP will now called the
Five Year Plan (FYP). The 2026-2030 FYP prioritization process is kicking off with more informat ion to
come. Partner agency project requests were sent to ACHD on March 18, 2025.
Amity Rd and Locust Grove Rd & Amity Road, Meridian to Locust Grove: These projects were
presented to the ACHD Commission on September 13th to discuss the projects status, questions and
concerns from the public, and the letters the City has submitted. Project was cancelled a future project
date is unknown. ACHD Commission. Project Website: https://engage.achdidaho.org/amity-road-and-
locust-grove-road-intersection
City Staff Contact: Brian McClure, Community Development
Eagle Road, Lake Hazel to Amity: Landscaping within the roundabout at Taconic will be included in the
Cost Share Permit. 95% design is complete. Widen Eagle to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and a
multi-use pathway. Includes a multi-lane roundabout at Eagle Rd and Taconic Dr. The current schedule
has the Eagle/Lake Hazel intersection open to traffic in late-July/early-August. As of 5/1/25, still no
pavement down, but grading is complete at intersection and work is moving down the hill. The
intersection of Eagle and Lake Hazel Roads remains closed, as well as Eagle Rd. between Lake Hazel Rd.
and Taconic Dr.
Project website: https://engage.achdidaho.org/eagle-road-lake-hazel-road-to-amity-road.
City Staff Contact: Brian McClure, Community Development
Fairview, Jericho Road to Eagle & Locust Grove/Fairview Signal: Widen intersection to 9 lanes on
Fairview and 7 lanes on Locust Grove. Widen Fairview to 7 lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk and Level 3
bike facility. Currently in ROW phase; construction is expected to start 2029. This project is
exceptionally complex with multiple curbs, materials, and elevations. Z-crossing just west of
6
Item 2.
Fairview/Webb in design. Here is a link to the project website: https://engage.achdidaho.org/fairview-
avenue-jericho-road-to-eagle-road
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
Franklin, McDermott to Black Cat: Widening Franklin Rd to 5 lanes between McDermott Rd and Black
Cat Rd, and improving the intersection of Franklin Rd and McDermott Rd. The Franklin Rd and
McDermott Rd intersection is a joint project with Nampa Highway District No. 1. City/ACHD
partnership on landscaping in the medians/buffers and future location for a “Welcome to Meridian”
sign being considered. Stormwater swales envisioned behind curb. 95% design plan-in-hand scheduled
for August 28th. Design in FY24-25, Right of Way in FY28-29, notice to proceed scheduled for future.
Posted speed to be 35 MPH but no design elements contemplated to support. Here is a link to the
project website: https://engage.achdidaho.org/franklin-road-mcdermott-road-to-black-cat-
road?utm_campaign=&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govDelivery
City Staff Contact: Hether Hill, Community Development
Lake Hazel Road, Eagle to Cloverdale: Widen Lake Hazel Rd to five 11’ lanes with curb gutter and 10’
detached multiuse path on both sides. Bridge improvement included to remove and r eplace the
existing bridge over the Ten Mile Creek. Project will include swales adjacent to the roadway. Design is
complete. Design 2022-2023; ROW; 2024; Construction 2027. City to cost share on continuous lighting
within Meridian City limits (not Boise). Project Website:
https://engage.achdidaho.org/lake_hazel_eagle_cloverdale.
City Staff Contact: Brian McClure, Community Development
Linder Rd., Overland Rd. to I-84 – Phase 1: Reconstruct and widen the intersection and construct the
new lanes north of the intersection. Additionally, this project will include APS, MUP’s, bulb -outs and
small retaining wall. On 90-day construction bid list for November 2024 with Notice to Proceed
(construction) in February 2025. Phase 1 of the Linder Road Overpass and Roadway Project as early as
mid-March 2025. Notice to Proceed is anticipated for April 7th and work is expected to be complete in
September 2025. Work will include reconstructing the Overland Road and Linder Road intersection,
adding sidewalk, bulb-outs and a multi-use pathway. Extending Linder Road north of Overland to I-84
to prepare for phase 2 when the overpass will be constructed. Constructing an access road to future
stormwater basin.
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
Linder Rd., I-84 to Franklin Rd. & Overpass of I-84 – Phase 2: Widen Linder Rd to 5 lanes with a bicycle
and pedestrian facility from Overland Rd to Franklin Rd. Project includes a new I -84 overpass,
improvements to the Overland and Franklin intersections, and connection of W Verbena Dr across
Linder. The City is funding design; design is complete. ROW is programmed at ACHD for 2024 -2025 and
construction is programmed for 2026-2027 in the IFYWP. https://engage.achdidaho.org/linder-road-
overpass-franklin-road-to-overland-road The City has been awarded $4.3M from ITD towards
completion of this project. The City and ACHD have entered into an agreement to spend the Strategic
Initiative Funds in 2025. The second phase of construction is currently programmed to begin late 2026
through 2027. This phase includes the I-84 overpass and the widening of Linder Rd from I-84 to
Franklin Rd.
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
7
Item 2.
Linder, Ustick to Pine (concept): The project team met to review concepts. Also, the ACHD Pedestrian
Advisory Group (PAG), ACHD Commissioners, and City staff did an onsite review of the existing
conditions on this stretch of road. In all concepts impacts to some properties would have left
substandard conditions for parking and exacerbated backout parking concerns for all users. New
concepts discussed include 3 and 5-lane designs with shared roads, roundabout couplets for improved
safety/access with turning restrictions, and enhanced speed mitigation features to promote school and
park access. A traditional 5-lane design with the most property acquisitions is also being considered.
The Transportation Commission recommended a 5-lane option to Council. On June 18th, 2024, City
Council gave general support for a traditional 5-lane option. Project Website:
https://engage.achdidaho.org/linder-road-pine-avenue-to-ustick-road.
City Staff Contact: Brian McClure, Community Development
Locust Grove Road, Bridge #1207: Design completed; won’t begin construction until FY27. New bridge
is going to be 3 lanes, not 5 despite opportunities for future ROW expansion (11/18/24). No additional
updates as of 5/1/25.
McMillan/Black Cat Roundabout: Multi-lane roundabout with truck apron, curb, gutter, and 10-foot-
wide multi-use pathways. Crosswalk at each leg with two stage pedestrian crossings and rectangular
rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) at each pedestrian crossing. City is partnering with ACHD on Tier 1
landscape improvements in the RAB (conduit for now, landscape in the future), splitter islands and 4-
foot buffer areas. 99% designed. Construction is planned for 2029 in the IFYWP. ACHD installed an
interim signal for the intersection of Black Cat / McMillia n in late December as part of the Ustick, Black
Cat to Ten Mile project. The intersection will function as a 2x2 signalized intersection in the interim
until the future RAB project. https://engage.achdidaho.org/mcmillan-and-black-cat-intersection
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
Star Road Bridge #1092: Bridge improvement project to remove and replace bridge #1092 over the
Middle Tap Sublateral as part of ACHD's Bridge Maintenance Program. Project is at 95% with plan in
hand site meeting on 5/7/25. This is the last of several bridges to allow for Star Road widening to 5 -
lanes in the future. Construction year is 2028.
Ustick, Ten Mile to Linder: Widen Ustick Rd to 5 lanes with curb, gutter, center medians, and multi-use
pathway from Ten Mile Rd to Linder Rd. Right-of-way is scheduled for 2025 in the adopted IFYWP and
construction is planned for 2026. Median landscaping is being explored by the project team. Concept
includes pedestrian bridge crossing over Five Mile Creek with a signalized crossing at Ustick. Design will
include multiuse pathways. A retaining wall will be necessary along Five Mile Creek. No
sidewalk/pathways along Five Mile Creek where retaining wall to be located; connection will rely on
City pathway on north side of creek (in Bridgetower).
https://engage.achdidaho.org/ustick_ten_mile_linder
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
Ustick, Black Cat to Ten Mile: Widen to 5-lanes with center medians. Signalized crossing at Naomi
(location of new ACHD maintenance facility, south of City wastewater facility. Notice to Proceed was
issued November 11th. Black Cat is closed north of Ustick, open south of Ustick. Aspenstone Street is
closed at Black Cat. Traffic has been shifted onto the temporary asphalt on the south side of Ustick –
one lane each direction. Irrigation and seepage bed installation is ongoing. Roadway and sidewalk
demo and prep is ongoing on the north side of Ustick. Eightmile Irrigation: concrete irrigation splitter
8
Item 2.
box placements completed this week. Waiting on lids; utility relocations are complete; temporary
precast sections have been set; irrigation work, apart from Ninemile, is nearly complete in preparation
for the City’s sewer bypass; Rutledge has been sleeved for sewer line install.
https://engage.achdidaho.org/ustick_black_cat_ten_mile
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
Ustick, McDermott to Black Cat: Widen Ustick Road to two lanes in each direction, with a center turn
lane and median islands where the center turn lane is not needed for access. Construct curb, gutter,
and a detached 10-foot-wide multi-use pathway with buffer on both sides of the roadway for
pedestrians and bicyclist. Install medians islands to calm traffic and provide access control where
necessary. Reduce speed limit to 35 mph and add stormwater basins to collect, treat, and infiltrate
stormwater runoff. In cooperation with the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) State Highway 16
Improvements Project, ACHD will expand and signalize the Ustick and McDermott Road intersection to
include: additional through lanes, dedicated right and left turn lanes on Ustick Road and dedicated left
turn lanes on McDermott Road and curb, gutter, and multi-use pathways. McDermott Road has been
realigned by ITD as part of their SH-16 extension project. Cost share was sent to ACHD PM in early
April. Coordinating on center median LS design, fiber and street lights also requested. 75% plan review
meeting held in March. 99% expected in December 2025. Need to have landscape design done by then.
https://engage.achdidaho.org/ustick-road-mcdermott-road-black-cat-road
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
Ustick, Owyhee Storm to Black Cat: Widen to two lanes in each direction, with a center turn lane and
median islands where the center turn lane is not needed for access. Project includes 10 -foot wide
multi-use pathways on each side, curb and gutter. ROW planned for 2026; construction 2027 in the
current IFYWP. Project cost is estimated at $11M. https://engage.achdidaho.org/ustick-road-owyhee-
storm-avenue-to-black-cat-road
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
Wells Street Bridge #1224:
Bridge improvement project to remove and replace bridge #1224 over Fivemile Creek as part of ACHD's
Bridge Maintenance Program. Project is at 95% with plan in hand site meeting on 5/7/25. Construction
year is 2029.
ACHD CAPITAL MAINTENANCE
Residential Capital Maintenance includes conducting field reconnaissance and collecting survey data to
determine an improvement strategy for deteriorated/non -compliant facilities such as: pavement,
drainage, pipes, sidewalks, ramps. ACHD aims for bringing the segments up to Complete Streets
standards where possible. Existing non-compliant pedestrian ramp and driveway access points located
along each roadway segment will be identified to be upgraded to meet ADA compliance. Reasonable
attempts will be made to improve each pedestrian ramp as directional, not diagonal.
Meridian Downtown Pavement and Pedestrian Improvements (2025): Formerly named: “FY2022
Residential Capital Maintenance”. The project goal is to rehabilitate pavement and add pedestrian
improvements including sidewalk and bulb-outs. Segments include: W 3rd St, W Pine to north end; E
Broadway Ave, E 3rd to E 6th; W Cherry Ave, NW 4th St to Meridian Rd; W Idaho Ave, W 8th St to N
Meridian Rd; W Maple Ave, W 1st St to N Meridian Rd; W 2nd St, W Cherry Ave to W Cherry Ln; NW 4th
9
Item 2.
S, W Broadway Ave to Maple Ave. https://engage.achdidaho.org/2025-meridian-downtown-pavement-
and-pedestrian-improvements Segments E Washington Ave, NW 7th to Meridian Rd; NW 7th St, W
Washington St to middle school micro-path (currently adding sidewalk, no pavement rehab, could
change); and W 6th St, W Washington St to W Carlton Ave are also part of this project, but have a
separate web page: https://engage.achdidaho.org/washington-street-and-6th-street On 90-day
construction bid list for October 2024 with Notice to Proceed (construction) in January 2025 , with
expected completion by fall 2025.
- Broadway Ave, E 3rd Street to E 6th Street - COMPLETE
- Cherry Ave, NW 4th Street to Meridian Rd - COMPLETE
- Idaho Ave, W 8th St to Meridian Rd
o Milling complete
- Maple Ave, W 1st Street to Meridian Rd - COMPLETE
- Washington St, NW 7th Street to Meridian Rd
o Grade prep and demo ongoing.
o Utility work ongoing.
- E 2nd Street, Idaho Ave to Pine Ave - COMPLETE
- E 4th Street, Broadway Ave to State Ave
o Demo, utility work and grade prep are ongoing
- W 2nd Street, Cherry Ave to Cherry Lane – COMPLETE
- W 3rd Street, Pine Ave to north end
o Site prep ongoing; Concrete placements – Pine Ave. is closed with Broadway as the
detour
- NW 4th Street, Broadway Ave to Maple Ave - COMPLETE
- NW 6th Street, Carlton Ave to Washington St
o Demo and utility work complete
o Concrete placements ongoing
- NW 7th Street, McFadden Ave to Washington St
o Demo and utility work complete
o Concrete placements ongoing
City Staff Contact: Hether Hill, Community Development
Residential Pavement and Pedestrian Improvements (2026): Segments included: 1st St W, south end to
Franklin Road; Rose Circle; Country Terrace Way S, south end to Overland Road; Blossom Pl, south end
to W McGlinchey Ave; McGlinchey Ave, Blossom Pl to NW 8th St; Interlachen Ct, west end to
Interlachen Way; Laurel Ct, south end to Verbena Dr; Tobago Ct. E., west end to SE 5 th Way; Larkspur
Ct, south end to Verbena Dr; Lilac St, south end to Waltman St; La vender Ct, south end to Verbena Dr;
Sugar Creek, south end to Sugar Creek Dr; Lawndale Dr, McGlinchey Ave to Crestmont Dr; Cruser Dr,
west end to Five Mile Rd; and Francine Pl S, Victory Rd to S Francine Ln. ACHD project number: 521060.
Project team meeting held April 12th. Per the November Notice to Proceed (NTP) list provided by
ACHD, this project is currently slated for NTP.
City Staff Contact: Hether Hill, Community Development
10
Item 2.
ITD PROJECTS (Updated by ITD Staff May 2025)
Chinden West Corridor: This project will result in 4 travel lanes (two in each direction). Widening will
take place to the south of the existing alignment and be constructed to accommodate future widening
to 6 travel lanes (three in each direction) with high -capacity intersections at roads with river crossings.
Project website: US-20/26 ChindenWest | ITD Projects (idaho.gov)
Middleton Road to Star Road: Final design for east and west sections was completed in September and
October 2023, respectively. Right of Way acquisition continues through 2025. Value Planning Session on
constructability/staging expected in summer 2025. PS&E is scheduled for late 2025 for both the east
(Key No. 24310) and west (Key No. 24309) packages. Construction is currently programmed for
2029/2031. https://chindenwest.com/middletontostar/
City Staff Contact: Caleb Hood, Community Development
ITD Project Manager: Erica Bowen, Erika.Bowen@itd.idaho.gov
Idaho Highway 16 extension, I-84 to U.S. 20/26
Project website: itdprojects.idaho.gov/pages/sh16corridor
I-84 SYSTEM Interchange and Franklin Road Interchange: Project began in January 2025 with the
contractor building ramp embankments and several bridge abutments. Contract completion is January
2027.
ITD Project Manager: Jeff Ryan, Jeff.Ryan@itd.idaho.gov
I-84 to Franklin: Construction is complete on the new I-84 interchange between Garrity and Ten Mile
and widening Franklin Road. The contractor will remain on site completing some punch list items.
ITD Project Manager: Jeff Ryan, Jeff.Ryan@itd.idaho.gov
Ustick to Chinden: Contract completion date is Fall of 2026. Contractor completed the US 20/26 and
SH 16 Interchange Bridge walls and abutments. Girders are installed and steel is being placed on the
deck. McDermott and Ustick permanent signal should be installed soon. US 20/26 (Chinden) now has
4-lanes including improved use of north ramps. Reconstruction of Ustick at SH 16 started and will
continue through the summer. Work has started on the Ustick Interchange Bridge abutments, ramps
and walls.
ITD Project Manager: Dan Gorley, Dan.Gorley@itd.idaho.gov
Franklin to Ustick: Contract completion date is Fall 2026. Work on the railroad bridge north of Franklin
continues with deck work complete and crews working on the railing. Crews continue working on the
Cherry Lane Bridge overpass, Quasi Place Bridge over Ten Mile Creek, and SH 16 Bridge over Ten Mile
Creek. Roadway grade is nearing completion between Cherry and Ustick.
ITD Project Manager: Dan Gorley, Dan.Gorley@itd.idaho.gov
Interstate 84 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane, Meridian Interchange to Eagle Interchange: This project will add
a second on-ramp lane eastbound at Meridian Interchange, an auxiliary (fifth) lane between Meridian
Interchange to Eagle Interchange, and a second southbound off -ramp lane at Eagle Interchange. A virtual
public open house was held February 13-28, 2024. Work continues on the environmental documentation
and Final Design. The current FY 2025 – FY 2031 ITIP shows $14.5 million in construction funding in the
year 2031.
11
Item 2.
https://itdprojects.org/projects/i-84-meridian-interchange-to-eagle-interchange-auxiliary-lane/
ITD Project Manager: Mark Wasdahl, Mark.Wasdahl@itd.idaho.gov
SH-55 Eagle Road Safety Review: An inter-agency team was assembled to discuss a safety review of Eagle
Road, I-84 to SH-44. The safety review, which included a speed study, was completed at the end of
February 2023. ITD has presented to City Council several times, the last time was on September 5, 2023.
ITD shared what was found in the safety review and showed what sign and striping improvements were
made as a result. They also shared that the speed study showed that no change to the enforceable
speed limits on Eagle Rd were recommended. ITD recognizes the city’s concerns regarding the daily
congestion on Eagle Rd and proposed implementing advisory speed limit signage with flashing
beacons. These would be activated during the busiest times of the day. The purpose would be to alert
the public of times when congestion is most likely. After the presentation there were concerns from the
mayor and at least one council member due to advisory speeds not being enforceable. ITD and the city
continue to engage to find the best solution for the traveling public on Eagle Rd. An additional inter-
agency team with law enforcement, the city, ITD, and other agencies will be put together in the coming
months to continue discussions. While different agencies may have different goals, the main goal we all
agree on is keeping the public safe and ensuring drivers can get to where they need to go as efficiently
and safely as possible. An inter-agency team was assembled to discuss a safety review of Eagle Road, I-
84 to SH-44. The safety review, which included a speed study, was completed at the end of February
2023. ITD has presented to City Council several times, the last time was on September 5, 2023. ITD shared
what was found in the safety review and showed what sign and striping improvements were made as a
result. They also shared that the speed study showed that no change to the enforceable speed limits on
Eagle Rd were recommended. ITD recognizes the city’s concerns regarding the daily congestion on Eagle
Rd and proposed implementing advisory speed limit signage with flashing beacons. These would be
activated during the busiest times of the day. The purpose would be to alert the public of times when
congestion is most likely. After the presentation there were concerns from the mayor and at least one
council member due to advisory speeds not being enforceable. ITD and the city continue to engage to
find the best solution for the traveling public on Eagle Rd. An additional inter-agency team with law
enforcement, the city, ITD, and other agencies was p ut together. They met to look at other options on
how to make it a safety corridor with warning signs, closing some unsignalized left turns, and potentially
adding variable speed limits. After the law enforcement meeting, there were two public open
houses. The comments and input from the open houses have been considered and ITD is moving toward
implementing several changes. Currently ITD is working on the design to remove some unsignalized left
turn movements, static signs have been ordered and are being made, and the design to add variable
speed signs is underway. The changes are schedule to begin this spring. The changes are part of a 2 year
pilot project to see if the they provide a safer corridor. While different agencies may have different
goals, the main goal we all agree on is keeping the public safe and ensuring drivers can get to where they
need to go as efficiently and safely as possible.
ITD Contact: Justin Price, Justin.Price@itd.idaho.gov
12
Item 2.
I-84 Mobility Improvement Study: This study will determine whether additional auxiliary lanes and
other improvements are needed to smooth merge hesitations, achieve better traffic distribution, and
achieve lane balance for the 11-mile section of Interstate 84 between the Garrity Interchange in
Nampa and the I-84/I-184 Wye Interchange in Boise. Existing traffic counts will be collected, future
traffic counts will be developed, existing conditions will be reviewed along with all previous
environmental and operational studies, traffic will be modeled, an origin-destination study will be
conducted, and a phasing plan developed. Collecting additional traffic counts in May 2025. Building
existing condition and future alternative traffic models. Developing a GIS ma p of previous
environmental reviews and actions.
ITD Project Manager: Mark Wasdahl, Mark.Wasdahl@itd.idaho.gov
SH-69 Traffic Study: Virtual public open house held April 7 through April 21, 2025. Following review and
evaluation of public comments, the corridor vision will be presented to cities of Kuna and Meridian, as
well as ACHD.
ITD Project Manager: Mark Wasdahl, Mark.Wasdahl@itd.idaho.gov
PATHWAYS (Updated by City Parks Staff April 2024)
Nine Mile Creek, Linder to Meridian: In initiating the land trade, parks staff discovered a strip of
easement belonging to Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District that can accommodate the pathway,
rendering a land trade unnecessary. The current (funded) project phase will run from NW 3rd Street
along the Ninemile Creek as far as approximately 8th Street. In April, staff received approval to
request additional funding from LHTAC for construction of this segment, as costs have risen
significantly since funds were originally allocated. Staff is currently working with an engineering
consultant, with plans expected to be complete in 2025, and project construction in 26/27. A future
City project (not yet funded) proposes to extend the Rail With Trail Pathway west as far as Linder Road.
Five Mile Creek Pathway: This project, which includes 2/3 of a mile of newly paved pathway along the
south bank of the Fivemile Creek, and a pedestrian bridge crossing of the Ninemile Creek, is now
complete. It connects 3 miles of existing pathway in northwest Meridian with more than 4 miles of
existing pathway to the east, allowing for approximately 8 miles of continuous multi-use pathway
through Meridian, primarily along the Fivemile Creek.
OTHER PROJECTS
MDC, Downtown Parking Efforts: MDC is working on an update to Destination Downtown. Part of this
is parking analysis. The MDC consultant is wrapping-up the Parking Management Strategies &
Implementation Guide. MDC and City Staff met in late January to discuss next steps.
13
Item 2.
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
From: Community Development Staff Meeting Date: August 4, 2025
Topic: Centrepoint Commercial Traffic Circulation
Safety
The City received a complaint regarding safety at the Centrepoint Way Shopping area, on the northwest
corner of Eagle and Ustick Roads. The primary east-west drive aisle on the north side of Hobby Lobby,
and the primary north-south drive aisle in front of Hobby Lobby, is a busy uncontrolled private
intersection. Further, there are no crosswalks or other signage alerting drivers to be cautious of other
user types.
City staff would like to understand from the Commission what sort of treatments the Commission may
recommend in addressing traffic safety, such as stop controls, curb returns, additional pavement
markings, speed reduction, or other treatments. Meridian staff intend to discuss the intersection with
the adjacent property owners.
Included:
Attachment A: Aerial Exhibit. This highlights public right-of-way for adjacent roads, notably N
Centrepoint Way and N Eagle Road.
Attachment B: Received Question/Comment and initial response and follow-up.
14
Item 4.
Attachment A : Aerial Exhibit
15
Item 4.
Attachment B: Received Question/Comment
From: Boris Shmukler <boris@shmuklerdesign.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2025 12:19 PM
To: Josha Iverson <jiverson@meridiancity.org>
Cc: Mayor Office Feedback <MayorOfficeFeedback@meridiancity.org>; Tracy Basterrechea
<tbasterrechea@meridiancity.org>; Brian McClure <bmcclure@meridiancity.org>; Caleb Hood
<chood@meridiancity.org>
Subject: Re: A new "Contact the Mayor's Office" form has been submitted!
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Hi Josha,
Thank you for your quick response and for forwarding my concerns to the relevant departments.
I'd like to clarify that my primary concern is not the intersection you indicated, but rather the one
I've marked in green on the photo you provided. The significant issue with this intersection is that
traffic laws are not being followed because it's considered a private road and lacks proper signage.
We had an almost fatal accident there just yesterday, and I've attached the video again for your
reference.
I look forward to hearing from Brian McClure and the Police Department this week.
Thanks,
Boris
Boris Shmukler
Call or Text (208)985-2581
www.shmuklerdesign.com
16
Item 4.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 11:27 AM Josha Iverson <jiverson@meridiancity.org> wrote:
Good morning Boris,
Hope you are well! Thank you for your email, it has been received by the Mayor’s Office. We
appreciate you reaching out and sharing your concerns about issues in your neighborhood and
some possible solutions. I provided an image below just to verify which intersection you are
referring to. if you can clarify we are all talking about the same area, that will help.
I’m not sure who you spoke with in other Departments, so I am also adding a few folks to this
email for their help and input.
Traffic calming measures such as signage, cross walks and speed limit indicators do require input
by the Ada County Highway District (ACHD), who own and operate the public roadways in
Meridian. That said, the Meridian Transportation Commission and supporting staff also review
and discuss these types of concerns and issues. To that, I have copied Brian McClure the Long-
Range Planning Supervisor and ask that he reach out to you directly this week to get some
additional details and help determine a good path forward to have these concerns reviewed.
ACHD does have a link (found HERE) on their website for a form to submit a Traffic Investigation
Report. I suggest talking with Brian first, and if this is a good added approach than you and he can
determine who is best to submit the request.
I have also copied the Police Department on this email and ask that they provide input this week
on their thoughts to review the issue.
Again, thank you for reaching out, as we appreciate you sharing your thoughts and bringing this to
our attention.
Josha Iverson| Executive Assistant
City of Meridian | Mayor’s Office
33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 489-0529
Built for Business, Designed for Living
17
Item 4.
All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho
law, in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from
disclosure by law
From: boris@shmuklerdesign.com <boris@shmuklerdesign.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2025 6:09 PM
To: Mayor Office Feedback <MayorOfficeFeedback@meridiancity.org>
Subject: A new "Contact the Mayor's Office" form has been submitted!
From: Boris Shmukler
Email: boris@shmuklerdesign.com
Phone: 2089852581
Question/Comment: Dear Robert Simison,
I would like to bring to your attention a significant public safety concern for Meridian residents
regarding the intersection near Hobby Lobby on Centrepoint Way. Despite multiple calls to the
City of Meridian and requests for Meridian Police Department presence to address speeding and
traffic law violations in the neighborhood, this issue remains unresolved due to apparent
jurisdictional complexities.
The situation escalated today, which was particularly disturbing. The intersection currently lacks
crucial signage, including speed limit indicators, a crosswalk, and a two-way stop. This absence is
especially problematic during the summer break and holiday seasons when traffic volume
increases significantly.
Could you please assist in addressing this pressing matter?
Sincerely,
Boris Shmukler
Call or Text
(208)985-2581
Should we contact you?: Yes
18
Item 4.
1
Chris Johnson
From:Dave Miles
Sent:Thursday, July 31, 2025 1:30 PM
To:Boris Shmukler; Josha Iverson
Cc:Mayor Office Feedback; Tracy Basterrechea; Brian McClure; Caleb Hood
Subject:RE: A new "Contact the Mayor's Office" form has been submitted!
Thank you Boris, and I appreciate you sharing the video and corrected intersection. I also appreciate your time this
afternoon on the phone. I will follow up with you after doing some ownership research and having some
preliminary conversations with our team.
Dave Miles | Chief of Staff
City of Meridian | Mayor’s Office
33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 489-0532|Fax: (208) 884-8119
Built for Business, Designed for Living
All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law,
in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law
From: Boris Shmukler <boris@shmuklerdesign.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2025 12:19 PM
To: Josha Iverson <jiverson@meridiancity.org>
Cc: Mayor Office Feedback <MayorOfficeFeedback@meridiancity.org>; Tracy Basterrechea
<tbasterrechea@meridiancity.org>; Brian McClure <bmcclure@meridiancity.org>; Caleb Hood
<chood@meridiancity.org>
Subject: Re: A new "Contact the Mayor's Office" form has been submitted!
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Hi Josha,
Thank you for your quick response and for forwarding my concerns to the relevant departments.
I'd like to clarify that my primary concern is not the intersection you indicated, but rather the one I've
marked in green on the photo you provided. The significant issue with this intersection is that traffic laws
are not being followed because it's considered a private road and lacks proper signage. We had an
almost fatal accident there just yesterday, and I've attached the video again for your reference.
I look forward to hearing from Brian McClure and the Police Department this week.
Thanks,
Boris
Boris Shmukler
19
Item 4.
2
Call or Text (208)985-2581
www.shmuklerdesign.com
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the
Internet.
To help protect y our privacy,
Microsoft Office prevented automatic
download of this picture from the
Internet.
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the
Internet.
To help protect y our privacy,
Microsoft Office prevented automatic
download of this picture from the
Internet.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 11:27 AM Josha Iverson <jiverson@meridiancity.org> wrote:
Good morning Boris,
Hope you are well! Thank you for your email, it has been received by the Mayor’s Office. We appreciate you
reaching out and sharing your concerns about issues in your neighborhood and some possible solutions. I
provided an image below just to verify which intersection you are referring to. if you can clarify we are all talking
about the same area, that will help.
I’m not sure who you spoke with in other Departments, so I am also adding a few folks to this email for their help
and input.
Traffic calming measures such as signage, cross walks and speed limit indicators do require input by the Ada
County Highway District (ACHD), who own and operate the public roadways in Meridian. That said, the Meridian
Transportation Commission and supporting staff also review and discuss these types of concerns and issues. To
that, I have copied Brian McClure the Long-Range Planning Supervisor and ask that he reach out to you directly
this week to get some additional details and help determine a good path forward to have these concerns
reviewed.
ACHD does have a link (found HERE) on their website for a form to submit a Traffic Investigation Report. I suggest
talking with Brian first, and if this is a good added approach than you and he can determine who is best to submit
the request.
I have also copied the Police Department on this email and ask that they provide input this week on their thoughts
to review the issue.
Again, thank you for reaching out, as we appreciate you sharing your thoughts and bringing this to our attention.
20
Item 4.
3
Josha Iverson| Executive Assistant
City of Meridian | Mayor’s Office
33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 489-0529
Built for Business, Designed for Living
All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law,
in regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law
From: boris@shmuklerdesign.com <boris@shmuklerdesign.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2025 6:09 PM
To: Mayor Office Feedback <MayorOfficeFeedback@meridiancity.org>
Subject: A new "Contact the Mayor's Office" form has been submitted!
21
Item 4.
4
From: Boris Shmukler
Email: boris@shmuklerdesign.com
Phone: 2089852581
Question/Comment: Dear Robert Simison,
I would like to bring to your attention a significant public safety concern for Meridian residents regarding
the intersection near Hobby Lobby on Centrepoint Way. Despite multiple calls to the City of Meridian
and requests for Meridian Police Department presence to address speeding and traffic law violations in
the neighborhood, this issue remains unresolved due to apparent jurisdictional complexities.
The situation escalated today, which was particularly disturbing. The intersection currently lacks crucial
signage, including speed limit indicators, a crosswalk, and a two-way stop. This absence is especially
problematic during the summer break and holiday seasons when traffic volume increases significantly.
Could you please assist in addressing this pressing matter?
Sincerely,
Boris Shmukler
Call or Text
(208)985-2581
Should we contact you?: Yes
22
Item 4.
BYLAWS OF THE MERIDIAN [NAME] COMMISSION PAGE 1 OF 2
BYLAWS of the [INSERT NAME OF COMMISSION]
Effective [Insert Date]
ARTICLE I: PURPOSE
These Bylaws are adopted to facilitate the duties of the [Insert Name of Commission]
(hereinafter “Commission”) and to provide a framework for the organization, actions, and
agenda of the Commission.
ARTICLE II: OFFICERS
SECTION 1: DUTIES OF CHAIR. The Commission Chair shall preside over all full
Commission meetings and shall sign all documents requiring an official signature on behalf of
the Commission. The decisions, statements, and/or actions of the Chair shall obligate, commit,
and/or represent the Commission only insofar as the Commission has specifically authorized.
SECTION 2: DUTIES OF VICE-CHAIR. The Commission Vice-Chair shall perform the
duties of the Chair in the absence of the Chair and shall perform such other duties as may be
delegated by the Commission Chair.
SECTION 3: NOMINATIONS. At the annual election of officers, the sitting vice chair shall
be automatically nominated for the office of chair.
SECTION 4: VACANCY. A special election may be held at any time to fill a vacancy of
office. The Chair shall add a special election to an agenda as needed, or upon the timely request
of any commissioner. An officer who fails to fulfill the duties of office may be removed from
the office by a majority vote of the full Commission at a special election.
ARTICLE III: MEETINGS
SECTION 1: NOTICE OF MEETINGS. Unless otherwise prescribed by statute, the
designated City staff member assigned to the commission shall provide commissioners written
notice of meetings, which notice shall state the date, hour, and location thereof, and shall further
state the purpose of the meeting, business to be transacted, and/or agenda. The designated City
staff member assigned to the commission shall provide shall issue notice to the Commission not
less than forty-eight (48) hours, nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the meeting.
SECTION 2: QUORUM. A majority of currently appointed commissioners shall constitute
a quorum.
SECTION 3: CONDUCT OF MEETINGS. The Commission shall operate generally under the
precepts of Robert’s Rules of Order. The order of business for meetings of the Commission shall
be as follows: 1) call to order; 2) roll call; 3) approval of the agenda; 4) approval of minutes of
previous meeting; 5) old business; 6) new business; 7) reports, presentations, subcommittee
reports, staff reports; 8) next meeting; 9) adjournment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the order
of business may be modified by the Commission Chair as needed.
23
Item 5.
BYLAWS OF THE MERIDIAN [NAME] COMMISSION PAGE 2 OF 2
SECTION 4: AGENDA. The agenda for all meetings of the Commission shall be prepared
by the designated City staff member assigned to the commission shall provide in consultation
with the Commission Chair. Agenda items may be proposed by the Commission Chair or any
commissioner and shall be placed on the agenda at the discretion of the Commission Chair,
provided that agenda items are proposed seven (7) days in advance of a regular meeting, or forty-
eight (48) hours in advance of a special meeting.
SECTION 5: PUBLIC APPEARANCES AND REQUESTS. Scheduling of appearances before
the Commission or requests to the Commission shall be at the discretion of the Chair. The Chair
may set rules to maximize efficiency and productivity of meetings, including setting a reasonable
time limit for presentations and/or comments to the Commission.
SECTION 6: MINUTES. Minutes and/or records of the business conducted at all meetings
of the Commission or any subcommittee thereof shall be prepared by the designated City staff
member assigned to the Commission and shall be open for public inspection. City staff shall
forward the minutes of each meeting to the Commission not less than forty-eight (48) hours, nor
more than thirty (30) days prior to the meeting at which such minutes are subject to approval by
the Commission.
SECTION 7: SUBCOMMITTEES. The Commission Chair, with the Commission’s approval,
may establish such subcommittees as necessary or helpful to assist or advise the Commission in
the performance of its functions and/or furtherance of its mission. Meetings of subcommittees
shall comply with any and all applicable public meetings laws. Each subcommittee shall consist
of at least two (2) commissioners. Unless a subcommittee chair is appointed by the Commission
Chair, each subcommittee shall elect a chair to preside at subcommittee meetings and present the
findings and/or recommendations of the subcommittee to the Commission. The Commission
Chair shall appoint commissioners or city public officials to serve as members of subcommittees.
The Commission Chair or Subcommittee Chair may invite non-commissioners to assist the work
of the subcommittee.
SECTION 8: VOTING. Each commissioner shall be entitled to one (1) vote on any matter
before the Commission. Except as otherwise designated herein or by law, decisions shall be
made on the vote of the majority of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is
present. The Commission Chair shall be a voting member. Voting shall be audible; written,
anonymous, and proxy voting shall not be permitted.
ARTICLE IV: AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS
As provided in Meridian City Code, the Commission may recommend to the Mayor and
City Council that these bylaws be altered, amended, added to, or repealed.
ARTICLE V: ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVE DATE
The Commission adopted the foregoing bylaws at its regular meeting on [Insert Date].
These bylaws shall be effective upon their ratification by resolution of the City Council of the
City of Meridian.
24
Item 5.
Nampa Service Scenarios
Public Transportation Service Scenarios
Reduce Service
1. If services were reduced, which alternative would you prefer?
Answered: 164 Skipped: 20
Alternative A
Alternative B
Alternative A 68 36.96%
Alternative B 96 52.17%
2. How would reduced fixed route or on-demand services in Nampa effect you?
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…1/14
25
Item 6.
Other - please describe
I wouldn't be able to access destinations in Nampa
It would affect someone I know
It would not affect me personally
I would have to find a new job
I would have to stay home
I would have to move
It would cost me more money
I would have to get a ride from someone
I would have to drive
0 10050
I would have to drive 35 19.02%
I would have to get a ride from someone 66 35.87%
It would cost me more money 75 40.76%
I would have to move 20 10.87%
I would have to stay home 34 18.48%
I would have to find a new job 32 17.39%
It would not affect me personally 35 19.02%
It would affect someone I know 68 36.96%
I wouldn't be able to access destinations in Nampa 74 40.22%
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…2/14
26
Item 6.
Expand Service
Answered: 176 Skipped: 8
Other - please describe 32 17.39%
3. How would you most like to see transit expanded in the future? Please ra…
80 - Wilder
58 - Middleton
57 - North Caldwell
HCT Rail Corridor
56 - South Caldwell
54 - Karcher/Cherry
52 - Midland/Lake Lowell
51 - 12th Ave S
45 - Nampa to Meridian
50 - Nampa/Caldwell Blvd
0 2 4 6 8 10
1
50 - Nampa/Caldwell
Blvd
2 45 - Nampa to Meridian
3 51 - 12th Ave S
23.27%
37
35.22%
56
25.16%
40
10.69%
17
1.89%
3
1.89%
3
1.89%
3
27.67%
44
32.08%
51
15.09%
24
9.43%
15
6.92%
11
3.77%
6
1.89%
3
12.58%
20
13.21%
21
28.93%
46
22.64%
36
10.69%
17
5.03%
8
3.77%
6
8.54
8.28
7.47
Rank Answers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Average
score
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…3/14
27
Item 6.
Eliminate General Public Transit in Nampa
Answered: 159 Skipped: 25
4 52 - Midland/Lake Lowell
5 54 - Karcher/Cherry
6 56 - South Caldwell
2.52%
4
3.77%
6
5.66%
9
32.08%
51
24.53%
39
18.87%
30
6.29%
10
2.52%
4
2.52%
4
4.4%
7
7.55%
12
40.25%
64
22.64%
36
11.95%
19
1.26%
2
5.03%
8
8.81%
14
5.03%
8
4.4%
7
37.74%
60
27.67%
44
6.11
5.60
5.18
4. How would the elimination of both fixed route and on-demand services in Nampa…
Other - Please describe
I wouldn't be able to access destinations in Nampa
It would affect someone I know
It would not affect me personally
I would have to find a new job
I would have to stay home
I would have to move
It would cost me more money
I would have to get a ride
I would have to drive
0 10050
I would have to drive 36 19.57%
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…4/14
28
Item 6.
Answered: 180 Skipped: 4
I would have to get a ride 71 38.59%
It would cost me more money 87 47.28%
I would have to move 28 15.22%
I would have to stay home 44 23.91%
I would have to find a new job 37 20.11%
It would not affect me personally 33 17.93%
It would affect someone I know 72 39.13%
I wouldn't be able to access destinations in Nampa 78 42.39%
Other - Please describe 31 16.85%
5. Which of the above scenarios do you recommended that the City of…
Other - Please describe
Eliminate all public transit services in Nampa, including On-
Demand and Fixed Route
The City of Nampa should increase funding to expand
service
Reduced Services - Alternative B: Eliminating Fixed Route
services in Nampa
Reduced Services - Alternative A: Eliminating On-Demand in
Nampa
Maintain Current Services
0 15010050
Maintain Current Services 44 23.91%
Reduced Services - Alternative A: Eliminating On-Demand in
Nampa
10 5.43%
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…5/14
29
Item 6.
Tell us a bit about you.
Answered: 180 Skipped: 4
Reduced Services - Alternative B: Eliminating Fixed Route ser
vices in Nampa
6 3.26%
The City of Nampa should increase funding to expand service 109 59.24%
Eliminate all public transit services in Nampa, including On-De
mand and Fixed Route
6 3.26%
Other - Please describe 5 2.72%
6. How often do you use public transportation?
Answered: 181 Skipped: 3
I ride every day
I ride weekly
I ride monthly
I would like to ride public
transportation
I never ride public
transportation
I ride every day 67 36.41%
I ride weekly 45 24.46%
I ride monthly 12 6.52%
I would like to ride public transportation 41 22.28%
I never ride public transportation 16 8.7%
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…6/14
30
Item 6.
7. What community do you live in?
Other
Rural Canyon County (outside city limits)
Melba
Middleton
Notus
Parm
Wilder
Greenleaf
Nampa
Caldwell
0 15010050
Caldwell 44 23.91%
Nampa 115 62.5%
Greenleaf 0 0%
Wilder 0 0%
Parma 1 0.54%
Notus 0 0%
Middleton 1 0.54%
Melba 0 0%
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…7/14
31
Item 6.
Tell us how you feel about public transportation.
Answered: 181 Skipped: 3
Rural Canyon County (outside city limits)1 0.54%
Other 19 10.33%
8. Are you a member of any of the following populations?
Answered: 176 Skipped: 8
Does not apply
Annual household income less that $26,000
Disabled
Over the age of 65
0 10050
Over the age of 65 27 14.67%
Disabled 52 28.26%
Annual household income less that $26,000 54 29.35%
Does not apply 81 44.02%
9. How does public transportation affect you?
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…8/14
32
Item 6.
Answered: 178 Skipped: 6
Positively
It does not affect me
Negatively
Positively 163 88.59%
It does not affect me 9 4.89%
Negatively 6 3.26%
9a. Tell us what the most positive factors are for you.
Other please describe.
It reduces congestion and helps the environment
I feel safer riding the bus, due to traffic, weather, health, or
other concerns.
I can do other things with my travel time than drive.
I don't have to provide as many trips for other people in my
family.
It saves me money.
It gives me independence to get to work, school, home,
shopping or social outings without having to rely on a vehic…
0 15010050
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…9/14
33
Item 6.
Answered: 163 Skipped: 21
It gives me independence to get to work, school, home, shoppi
ng or social outings without having to rely on a vehicle, or ride
s from others.
123 66.85%
It saves me money.107 58.15%
I don't have to provide as many trips for other people in my fa
mily.
30 16.3%
I can do other things with my travel time than drive.63 34.24%
I feel safer riding the bus, due to traffic, weather, health, or oth
er concerns.
86 46.74%
It reduces congestion and helps the environment 98 53.26%
Other please describe.49 26.63%
9b. Tell us what the most negative factors are for you.
0
1
2
3
4
It costs too m...It takes too m...It doesn't go ...It doesn't com...It is unsafe Other please d...
It costs too much in public support 4 2.17%
Answers Count Percentage
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propo…10/14
34
Item 6.
Answered: 6 Skipped: 178
It takes too much time to get where I need to go 0 0%
It doesn't go to the places I need to go 1 0.54%
It doesn't come often enough 0 0%
It is unsafe 0 0%
Other please describe 1 0.54%
10. Do you support your local government contributing to the funding of…
Answered: 177 Skipped: 7
Yes
No
No opinion
Yes 165 89.67%
No 10 5.43%
No opinion 2 1.09%
10a. What is the most important reason or reasons you support funding public…
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propos…11/14
35
Item 6.
Other
To maximize taxpayer spending through operations efficiency
(1 bus = 19 cars), increasing capacity of existing roadways
Reduce social services and medical costs to ensure citizens
can be connected with essential public services
Supports all citizens having access to be productive
members of society
To support economic productivity so all people including
those who cannot drive can access jobs and services
To allow our household to own fewer cars
To allow me to save money
To reduce congestion
To reduce wear and tear on road infrastructure
There needs to be choices for people who have no other
travel options to get around.
0 50 100 150
There needs to be choices for people who have no other trave
l options to get around.
150 81.52%
To reduce wear and tear on road infrastructure 82 44.57%
To reduce congestion 111 60.33%
To allow me to save money 80 43.48%
To allow our household to own fewer cars 40 21.74%
To support economic productivity so all people including those
who cannot drive can access jobs and services
116 63.04%
Supports all citizens having access to be productive members
of society
103 55.98%
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propo…12/14
36
Item 6.
Answered: 165 Skipped: 19
Reduce social services and medical costs to ensure citizens c
an be connected with essential public services
70 38.04%
To maximize taxpayer spending through operations efficiency
(1 bus = 19 cars), increasing capacity of existing roadways an
d infrastructure
91 49.46%
Other 27 14.67%
10b. Why do you not support your local government funding public transportation?
The word cloud requires at least 20 answers to show.
When I see an inter-city bus, I rarely see any passengers on it. This is not a cost effective use our tax
payer funds given the low ridership. I do support City of Nampa subsidizing on-demand or even Uber
services for those who truly need it.
1
Waste of money 1
Unless the city and community were prepared to actually scale up to a level where public transit was a
n actual alternative to driving, which is never going to happen, it remains a system of mostly-empty bu
sses clogging up traffic to deliver a few people who happen to need to go to one of the few places it g
oes to and have a schedule sufficiently flexible to wait for a bus that may or may not be on-time. As for
the on-demand system, it's basically using slow, large vehicles to replicate Uber and Lyft, so long as y
ou live in the service area, and are ok getting to a nearby bus stop and ok with getting let off somewhe
re other than where you are actually going. I LOVE the concept of public transit, but even the part that
should be an easy sell (the park and ride from Nampa to Boise) is almost NEVER used, though empty
busses stop by dozens of times a day for the 1 or 2 cars in the lot. Idaho is never going to invest in it e
nough to make it work, so we should just let it go.
1
The Founding Fathers never intended for the government to steal from the hard-working and give to t
he lazy.
1
No one is on the bus.1
It's too expensive.1
Response Count
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propo…13/14
37
Item 6.
Answered: 9 Skipped: 175
It is up to private companies to see a need and fulfill it. Otherwise, those with cars are subsidizing the
transportation of those without cars. This is unfair to make taxpayers pay for this. Additionally, I hardly
ever see anyone in the buses.
1
Foolish waste of money - terrible ROI - When there is demand then will support.. There is demand for
demand services for medical and grocery needs.
1
Because we don’t need more taxes or levys or bonds.1
11. What would you estimate is the percent of your household budget for…
Answered: 165 Skipped: 19
15-25%
Less than 15%
More than 25%
15-25%74 40.22%
Less than 15%73 39.67%
More than 25%18 9.78%
Answers Count Percentage
5/7/25, 1:58 PM Nampa Service Scenarios
https://survey123.arcgis.com/surveys/3e2e45b90a424efdbb951ee69ac0de99/analyze?position=0.current_services&chart=0.which_of_these_propo…14/14
38
Item 6.
Rider Stories
I am going to CWI but hope
to go to BSU in 2026 for
education. My house is not
in the service area, my
mom has to drop me off at
Albertsons to get on. I never
learned how to drive it
helps me save money to go
to college, and I have great
conversations like about
the Zombie apocalypse.
-Crystal Riding the 150 to
CWI
Getting to work and
back home would be
very expensive or
impossible without the
bus system
-John Route 45 riding
home
I am getting my GED. My family is
too busy with work and other
obligations to drive me to school. I
don't have my driver’s license. I
have a personal issue with car
crashes and am too scared to drive
and get in an accident.
-Arianna Route 42 riding to BSU
We are homeless and live at the
Women’s Shelter in Nampa (grandma,
mom, and toddler daughter), we have to
leave during the day and go to the
Salvation Army for meals and go to the
Nampa Library. Saturday service would
be really nice to we could go somewhere.
I have been in a wheelchair on and off
and will have to have back surgery if the
wait is too long or I have to walk too far it
gets irritated (Grandma). Need Saturday
Service, wait is too long, too far to walk.
-Anonymous Route 42
Really appreciated VRT working with me to get my girls
(9&10) on the bus, it really opened up a whole new
world for us. Also appreciated that they changed our
stop it is more convenient now. We also like the bus
drivers. One of the bus drivers surprises us with toys and
stuffed animals (Samantha 10 years old). Also, we love
Dave! (driver). Only mode of transport.
-Nick Route 150 riding to the pet store
It brings me to many places in the
city. I don't have a car, and I am
working. The drivers are good
people. God bless all of you!
-Raul Route 150 riding to work
It has saved me a lot of money obviously and made me
more productive in a way. It initiates go/work mode
because I have to adapt to the schedule of the bus. For
example, I often wake up earlier (than I would if I had a
car) in order to get the most straight-forward/shorter bus
rides. But even when the rides are long, it's quiet and
clean enough for me to get work done on the bus, or read
a book, or just talk to the friends that I have made from
sharing the same route. A lot of my rider friends do own
cars, and they have been generous at times with picking
me up or dropping me off if it is particularly cold or too
hot to walk from the bus stop. They do feel like my little
VRT community. The drivers are all so sweet. I remember
having particularly good days when some of the drivers
first called me by my name. If this is a good shoutout
opportunity, I would like to shoutout Lauren and Raoul!
They have shared stuff about the Treasure Valley that I
otherwise would not have known (seeing as I am not
originally from here). I also like that I am doing my part
(though tiny) in contributing to a greener planet by taking
the bus.
-Anniella Route 42 rides to work
I have gotten my
independence back.
- Kit Route
150 riding
to a
friends
Without On-Demand I'd
be a lot more broke.
Lyft is around $18-$24
per trip and I can't
justify paying that
amount every day.
-Andrew Route 150
riding to work
Appreciate the ride when
you don't have
transportation of your
own.
-Kenneth Route 150
I have ridden the bus for 24 years. It saves wear
and tear on my nerves and my car. I don't have
to worry about nasty weather, and I can read all
the time. Everyone on the 43 knew each other,
people chat on this route too. Lots of local
government and state workers utilize these bus
services. Love to have more service and I
support having a rail line it would be very
popular and convenient. Park n ride at Simplot
Stadium (Caldwell) works well it is safe and
never had a problem.
-Peggy Route 40 riding home from work at State
Tax Commission
Hard to get out of Nampa, not
enough regular stops. Has to
ride an hour or more to get
where he's going. Would like
to have more routes that go
to Boise. Without a transfer
station stop. (Disabled in
wheelchair)
-Henry Route 150 riding to a
medical appointment
Saves wear and
tear on my car, I
have an hour to
read for work
each way.
-Pete Route 40
riding home from
work at BSU
I started riding in 2022 my
expectation was it would be like New
York City crowded with homeless,
stinky people. But it wasn't. I can't
drive; we are a 1 car family. I was
hesitant to ride, but my wife showed
me the app and now I can get to work
and take my daughter swimming. My
daughter does not understand the
designated bus stops and wants to
get off directly at the Nampa Rec
Center. Love my driver, Dave!
-Michael Route 150 riding to work
This my second day of
riding, I plan to ride 5
days a week. Riding the
bus helps me save ALOT
on gas and I can enjoy the
ride.
-Taylor Route 40 riding to
work
It has saved me
money and it is
always on time when
I get off work.
-Lorenzo Route 45
riding to work
The service brings me
to the gym and to the
store. I love VRT
OnDemand and the
app is great! It would
be nice if they had it in
Boise and Eagle again.
-Rob Route 150 riding
to work
Before learning about on-
demand, I would pay a friend to
take me to work and to the store.
On-Demand is always available,
and the drivers are friendly. The
service is very affordable.
-Sandra Route 150 riding to work
39
Item 6.
Pg. 1
MEMO TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Agenda Topic on the Transportation Commission Agenda
From: Hether Hill Meeting Date: August 4, 2025
Topic: Staff Communications
Below are summaries of relevant correspondences received by City Staff since the last TC meeting.
CORRESPONDENCE #1: SEE EXHIBIT A
Bette,
Thank you for sharing the information. I'm including our planning staff who are actively working on this issue as
part of their planning efforts for they yea. One of the main components to their efforts is to define a
transporation solution to this area for long-term planning. As your document also includes some immediate
recommendations that our Transportation Commission could evaluate in the mid-term, you may hear from
Hether about a seperate conversation focused on that isue.
Respectfully,
Robert Simison
Get Outlook for Android
From: Bette Monteith <bette06@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 12:19:13 PM
To: Robert Simison <rsimison@meridiancity.org>; Brian Whitlock <bwhitlock@meridiancity.org>; Liz Strader
<lstrader@meridiancity.org>; Doug Taylor <dtaylor@meridiancity.org>; John Overton
<joverton@meridiancity.org>; Anne Little Roberts <alittleroberts@meridiancity.org>; Luke Cavener
<lcavener@meridiancity.org>
Cc: tregbernt@gmail.com <tregbernt@gmail.com>
Subject: Woodbridge Subdivision Traffic Concerns
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Following our attendance at the City Council meeting on May 6, 2025, we were pleased to receive the support of
the City of Meridian regarding the ongoing traffic issues affecting the Woodbridge Subdivision and the
continued growth surrounding our neighborhood.
For your consideration in any upcoming meetings or discussions with ACHD, we’ve attached a summary
highlighting the actions taken over the past 25 years, as well as a snapshot of the development activity currently
impacting our subdivision.
We appreciate your willingness to share this information in your dialogue with ACHD and, once again, thank you
for your continued support.
Sincerely,
Woodbridge Subdivision (aka Snorting Bull)
40
Item 9.
Pg. 2
CORRESPONDENCE #2:
From: Hether Hill
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 4:30 PM
To: David Wright <cordoba8587@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Pine between Black Cat and 10 Mile
Hi David,
Thank you for reaching out. Yes, I am aware of citizen concerns on Pine, between Black Cat and Ten Mile, and
have shared these with ACHD and Meridian Police. I will share your concerns with the Meridian Transportation
Commission during their next meeting on August 4th to facilitate further conversations. These meetings consist
of ex-officio members from ACHD, Police and West Ada School District (WASD), as well as several other partner
agencies.
So you are aware, between May and June, the Meridian Police Department was informed and received a couple
of complaints related to speed on this section of Pine. As a result, they placed speed/radar signs, and have been
working the area for speed enforcement. The Police Department is also in communication with ACHD about the
possibility of additional posted speed limit signs. I will follow up with them and see what progress has been
made or what updates they can share and will be in touch.
Thank you,
Hether Hill | Long-Range Associate Coordination Planner
City of Meridian | Community Development Department
33 E. Broadway Ave., Suite 102, Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: 208-489-0319
Built for Business, Designed for Living
All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in
regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law.
From: David Wright <cordoba8587@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 9:35 PM
To: Hether Hill <hhill@meridiancity.org>
Subject: Pine between Black Cat and 10 Mile
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Hi Heather,
I was told that maybe you were aware of the situation on Pine between Black Cat Rd and 10 Mile and might be
able to help. Our house backs up to Pine and we have lived here for 18 years. A lot of people like to use this
section of Pine like a drag strip. Many cars, trucks, and motorcycles fly down the road making a lot of noise and
creating a danger for the public because of their excessive speed. I asked about speed bumps at one time but
was told it wasn't feasible because of the speed limit on Pine. Something needs to be done. It's just ridiculous
how fast some people drive down this road. I've seen people in the past driving back and forth going as fast as
they can-probably around 80 mph. I'm surprised somebody hasn't gotten killed or seriously hurt yet. Probably
just a matter of time. Hopefully the city is looking into options to make this safer.
Thank you.
David Wright
41
Item 9.
Pg. 3
CORRESPONDENCE #3:
-----Original Message-----
From: Caleb Hood <chood@meridiancity.org>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 3:30 PM
To: Dave Miles <dmiles@meridiancity.org>; Lori Landucci <lorilanducci@icloud.com>; Communications
<Communications@meridiancity.org>
Cc: Hether Hill <hhill@meridiancity.org>; Brian McClure <bmcclure@meridiancity.org>; Josha Iverson
<jiverson@meridiancity.org>; John Wasson <jwasson@achdidaho.org>; Kelly Bruner <kbruner@achdidaho.org>
Subject: RE: Speed bumps
Hi Lori! My name is Caleb Hood and I'd like to get you in contact with ACHD Staff. They are going to be most
helpful in evaluating the situation and making recommendations. I'm including two of our key ACHD staff we
work with on a regular basis on these types of requests: Kelly Bruner and John Wasson on this email. I'm sure
ACHD will need some more information from you to proceed. In fact, if you want some more background on
what ACHD's process looks like here is their webpage: https://www.achdidaho.org/projects/propose-a-
project/traffic-calming
Would you mind sharing your phone number, Lori? John/Kelly would one of you please connect with Lori? Let's
connect in the near future and determine next steps, particularly if this needs to be an agenda item for the
Transportation Commission please.
Thanks all!
Caleb
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Miles <dmiles@meridiancity.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2025 7:55 AM
To: Lori Landucci <lorilanducci@icloud.com>; Communications <Communications@meridiancity.org>
Cc: Hether Hill <hhill@meridiancity.org>; Brian McClure <bmcclure@meridiancity.org>; Caleb Hood
<chood@meridiancity.org>; Josha Iverson <jiverson@meridiancity.org>
Subject: RE: Speed bumps
Hi Lori - I am happy to have our planning staff that engage in road and transportation issue reach out to you and
discuss your concerns and help navigate a process to evaluate risks, needs and impacts. I have copied Caleb
Hood and his team as they work directly with the Transportation Commission, and the Ada County Highway
District (who manage the road operations). Caleb and team can help discuss your thoughts and ideas and what
may be feasible and how to go about that.
Sincerely,
Dave Miles | Chief of Staff
City of Meridian | Mayor’s Office
33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642
Phone: (208) 489-0532|Fax: (208) 884-8119
Built for Business, Designed for Living
All e-mail messages sent to or received by City of Meridian e-mail accounts are subject to the Idaho law, in
regards to both release and retention, and may be released upon request, unless exempt from disclosure by law
-----Original Message-----
42
Item 9.
Pg. 4
From: Lori Landucci <lorilanducci@icloud.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 7:50 PM
To: Communications <Communications@meridiancity.org>
Subject: Speed bumps
External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments.
Sent from my iPhone I live in meridian in the spurwing greens off of tree farm! There is a lot of cars that speed
on this road to make the light! I’ve almost been hit a few times. Kids cross and so do sucks and geese.. I’m afraid
someone will be hurt or killed by the cars driving so fast! Can we get signs to say slow down or speed bumps or
something. This is scary and dangerous. Thank you for your time! Sincerely Lori landucci
43
Item 9.
EXHIBIT A
1
Woodbridge Community – Discussion Points for City Council & ACHD Meeting
on Traffic Relief
Acknowledgment and Appreciation
The Woodbridge community appreciates the City Council's recent decision to postpone
the proposed development on Wells Avenue/Magic View in light of significant traffic
concerns raised by residents for many years.
We view this as an important first step and thank you for listening to the community’s
concerns.
Urgent Need for Action
As stated during the last meeting, City Council has "kicked the can down the road" for
too long regarding cut-through traffic issues at Woodbridge.
Now is the time to pursue meaningful, long-term solutions to address traffic cutting
through our neighborhood from Locust Grove to Eagle Road
We, the residents of the Woodbridge Subdivision, wish to formally express our deep concern
regarding the ongoing and worsening issue of cut-through traffic in our community — an issue
we fear will not see resolution for at least another 5 to 10 year under current planning and
constraints.
Summary of the Issue
Currently, there are only two viable routes from Locust Grove to Eagle Road:
1. Leaving the road network as-is, which results in an overwhelming volume of cut-
through traffic through Woodbridge.
2. Rerouting traffic through Locust View Heights, utilizing the signal at Bentley to
connect with the frontage road. However, this solution is legally and politically
complicated. The Locust View Heights subdivision has clearly stated they would pursue
legal action if this proposal moves forward, potentially tying up the project for years.
Even if consensus were reached, implementation would still take a minimum of five
years.
In the meantime, new development is rapidly progressing. A new commercial building has just
been acquired along Locust Grove and will soon be staffed, contributing potentially more
vehicles to the local traffic burden. This is on top of the already high volume of cars using
Woodbridge as a bypass route.
44
Item 9.
EXHIBIT A
2
Road Classification and Planning Flaws
Franklin and Overland are designated as Arterial roads and were built with the intent to manage
increased traffic. Woodbridge Drive is designated as a Collector street which is designed to
link local streets and residential areas to main roads or highways. We were told this designation
was because there are no homes off Woodbridge Drive that face the street. The second phase
of Woodbridge (Thornwood, Woodhaven and Bowstring) by contrast, was not — homes in
this area face their streets, and these streets were never designed to handle collector-level traffic,
as they are designated as residential streets.
We understand the classification of streets — from residential to collector — but we struggle to
understand why exceptions can’t be made, especially given that ACHD has, in fact, made
exceptions in the past to fix planning mistakes. Why can’t a similar consideration be made here
when it is clear that a planning error made 25 years ago is being perpetuated to the detriment of
our neighborhood?
Community Sentiment
The most common response we hear is:
“Why don’t they close your entrance on Magic View like all the other subdivisions on
Locust Grove?”
And we ask the same. Closing this entrance would naturally redirect traffic to designated
collector/arterial roads where it belongs; relieving our streets of volume they were never
designed to support.
Why Woodbridge is a Unique Case
The traffic challenges faced by Woodbridge are distinct and serious.
The issue stems from decisions made over 25 years ago when the development was first
approved. At that time:
o Street classifications between "collector" and "residential" were not major
considerations.
o No one could have foreseen the massive growth and traffic expansion the area
would experience.
While street designations on Woodbridge Drive have previously been stated that this
situation would never change, now is the time for an exception.
45
Item 9.
EXHIBIT A
3
Current Traffic Impacts
Woodbridge is experiencing significant cut-through traffic, including:
o Daily commuters
o Commercial trucks and service vehicles
o Employees from nearby businesses (e.g., medical offices, title companies, hotels,
Hubble Homes, etc.)
o This is evident from the signage on many of these vehicles.
Google Maps and GPS services route traffic directly through Woodbridge,
suggesting it as the fastest path from locations like Dairy Queen on Watertower to St.
Luke’s Hospital on Eagle Road.
Traffic studies show upwards of 2,000 vehicles per day cut through Woodbridge.
With the new development and expansion on Locust Grove/Bentley area, which
includes the ICOM College and all their planned new buildings and student housing and
the potential new residential housing development on Magic View and Wells Avenue,
these new developments will cause a large increase in cut through traffic in Woodbridge.
Comparative Analysis with Nearby Subdivisions
Woodbridge is the only subdivision between Victory and Fairview that has a full cut-
through route from Locust Grove to Eagle Road.
Other nearby subdivisions and residential complexes—Sagamore, Sageland,
Shellbrooke, Ingelbrooke, Raven Hill, Locust View Heights, Brookside Square,
Shallow Creek Apartments, and Enclave Apartments—do not have similar access
and therefore do not experience this volume of pass-through traffic.
This places an unfair and disproportionate burden on our community.
Community Requests for Temporary Relief
While long-term solutions are developed in partnership with ACHD and City Council, we
respectfully request temporary mitigation measures:
1. Temporary Closure of Magic View Exit
o Install a gate with access only for residents and safety personnel to enter and exit
through Magic View using an arm with appropriate clickers.
o Or, install bollards to block the exit from Woodbridge to Magic View.
o This will immediately reduce cut-through traffic and provide relief to residents.
2. Install “No Outlet” Signage
o Place clear “No Outlet” signage at the entrance on Locust Grove, deterring
GPS-directed and non-residential through traffic.
46
Item 9.
EXHIBIT A
4
Commitment to Explore Alternative Traffic Routes-Request for Action
We urge the City of Meridian, ACHD, and relevant agencies to:
Collaborate with Woodbridge HOA, ACHD, and the City to evaluate and implement alternative
routes to carry commuter and commercial traffic away from residential neighborhoods.
Reassess the current traffic strategy in and around Woodbridge.
Consider interim solutions, such as restricted turns or timed closures at Magic View.
Explore long-term rerouting options with community input.
Recognize this as a planning issue, not a neighborhood nuisance, and act with urgency
We love our community. We are not opposed to growth. But we do expect accountability, vision,
and equity in how growth is managed — and right now, those principles are not being reflected
in how our subdivision is treated.
We look forward to continued collaboration and appreciate your efforts to preserve the safety
and quality of life in our community.
Respectfully,
Woodbridge Subdivision Representatives
47
Item 9.