HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo from PlanningRECEIVED
Project: (Trau
APR ~ 7 ?_007
Citya£Meridian
Location: south side of Cherry Lane, approximately '/z mile east of Black Cat Road City Clerk Qffice
Applications: annexation and zoning, preliminary plat, alternative compliance, and private street.
Highlights of Proposed Development: annexation and zoning of 1.0 acres to the L-O and R-8 zoning
districts; and preliminary plat approval of 1 office lot and 1 common lot in the proposed L-O zone, and 3
single-family building lots in the proposed R-8 zone. Lot sizes range from 4,860 square feet for the office
lot to approximately 11,175 square feet. The average lot size is approximately 9,125 square feet. The
private street application is to access the one office lot. The residences take access from a shared drive.
The alternative compliance rcqucstrs in regard to the required land use buffer.
Gross Residential Density: approximately 4 units per acre
Number of Proposed Buildings: 1. converted home; approximately 1,844 square feet.
Other: Staff and Commission recoinmeud a DA willx tl~e following site specific provisions:
• Only principally permitted uses allowed within the L-O zone. No ancillary commercial uses or other
conditionally allowed uses.
• Hours of operation for the office lot shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 10 p.rn.
• That a 5-foot wide landscape buffer will be installed along the private street at the east property line
prior to occupancy of the first office building on this site.
• That a 10-foot wide landscape buffer will be installed on Lot 2 along the east property line prior to
occupancy of the first office building on this site.
• That prior to issuance of a CZC, the Applicant records across-access, ingress/egress easement to the
parcel to the east.
Elevations: No
Commission Recommendation: approval at their March 15, 2007 public hearing.
Summary of Public Hearing:
i. In favor: Kandi Hall (Applicant's Representative), Larry Taylor (Developer), Bill Grau (Property
Owner)
ii. In opposition: None
iii. Commenting: None
iv_ Written testimony: None
Key Issues of Discussion by Commission:
i. Fencing -Applicant has agreed to install any necessary perimeter fencing to match that of the
adjacent properties
ii. Relocating the internal sidewalk from the east side of the building to the west
Key Commission Changes to Staff Recommendation:
i. The Applicant shall provide sidewalk which extends froze the proposed office building out to
Cherry Lane to be located at the west side of the building
Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council:
i. The Commission did not make a motion to require the installation of perimeter fencing, as agreed
to by the Applicant. Please modify condition 1.2.6 to add bullet stating, "Applicant shall provide
perimeter fencing."
ii. The Applicant has provided Staff with the revised preliniinacy plat and landscape plan. Tlie
updated plans are included and evaluated in the staff report.
Written Testimony since Staff Report: none