Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-09-16 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, September 16, 2025 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener ABSENT Councilman Doug Taylor Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilman Whitlock. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the September 2, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the September 2, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Pine 43 West Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0109) 4. Tresidio Design Center Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0108) 5. Pine 43 West Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0110) 6. Firenze Plaza McDonalds Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0112) 7. Modified Final Plat (Little Creek MFP-2024-0002) to amend the boundary of the subdivision along Locust Grove Rd. due to the requirement of additional right-of- way by ACHD, by J-U-B Engineers, located at the southeast corner of N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Wilson Ln. 8. Final Plat for Pollard North (FP-2025-0019) by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/4 mile west of N. Black Cat Rd. and north of W. Chinden Blvd. 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Ten Mile Flex (H-2025-0027) by Jeff Hatch, located at 4255 N. Ten Mile Rd. 10. Development Agreement (Idaho Power McDermott Substation H-2025-0008) Between City of Meridian and Idaho Power Company for Property Located at the Southwest Corner of McMillan Rd. and N. Owyhee Storm Ave. 11. Approval of Agreement for Supplies to Polydyne, Inc. for Polymer FY2025-2026 for the Not-To-Exceed Price Per Pound of $1.38 and resulting Purchase Order in the amount of $303,600 12. Amended Emergency Management Joint Powers Agreement Between City of Meridian and Ada County, Ada County Highway District, City of Boise, City of Eagle, City of Garden City, City of Kuna, and City of Star 13. Addendum No. 23 to Agreement for City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services Between the City of Meridian and the City of Boise ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 14. Lakeview Golf Course Fees Discussion 15. Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Presentation and Discussion 16. Fiscal Year 2026 Citywide Fee Update EXECUTIVE SESSION \[Action Item\] 17. Executive session per Idaho Code 74-206(1)(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code. Motion to enter executive session made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener Into executive session: 5:35 PM Out of executive session: 5:59 PM ADJOURNMENT 6:00 PM Meridian City Council Work Session September 16, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4.30 p.m. Tuesday, September 16, 2025, by Council Vice-President Strader. Members Present: Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Members Absent: Robert Simison and Doug Taylor. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Garrett White, Caleb Hood, Jenny Fields and Todd Lavoie. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE _X_ Liz Strader _X_ Brian Whitlock _X_Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison Strader: I call the Meridian City Council work session to order. Today is Tuesday, September 16th, 2025, at 4.30 p.m. We will begin this work session meeting with roll call attendance. Mr. Clerk. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Strader: Okay. Thank you. And next up we have adoption of the agenda. Overton: Council Vice-President, there are no changes to the agenda this evening. I move that we approve the agenda as published. Strader: Thank you, Councilman Overton. Do we have a second? Little Roberts: Second. Strader: Okay. Fantastic. We have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the September 2, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 2 of 23 2. Approve Minutes of the September 2, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Pine 43 West Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025- 0109) 4. Tresidio Design Center Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0108) 5. Pine 43 West Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0110) 6. Firenze Plaza McDonalds Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0112) 7. Modified Final Plat (Little Creek MFP-2024-0002) to amend the boundary of the subdivision along Locust Grove Rd. due to the requirement of additional right-of-way by ACHD, by J-U-B Engineers, located at the southeast corner of N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Wilson Ln. 8. Final Plat for Pollard North (FP-2025-0019) by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/4 mile west of N. Black Cat Rd. and north of W. Chinden Blvd. 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Ten Mile Flex (H-2025-0027) by Jeff Hatch, located at 4255 N. Ten Mile Rd. 10. Development Agreement (Idaho Power McDermott Substation H- 2025-0008) Between City of Meridian and Idaho Power Company for Property Located at the Southwest Corner of McMillan Rd. and N. Owyhee Storm Ave. 11. Approval of Agreement for Supplies to Polydyne, Inc. for Polymer FY-2025-2026 for the Not-To-Exceed Price Per Pound of$1.38 and resulting Purchase Order in the amount of $303,600 12. Amended Emergency Management Joint Powers Agreement Between City of Meridian and Ada County, Ada County Highway District, City of Boise, City of Eagle, City of Garden City, City of Kuna, and City of Star 13. Addendum No. 23 to Agreement for City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services Between the City of Meridian and the City of Boise Strader: Next up we have the Consent Agenda. Overton: Council Vice-President? Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 3 of 23 Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: Move that we approve the Consent Agenda. For the Council Vice-President to sign and the Clerk to attest. Whitlock: Second. Strader: Okay. Fantastic. We have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? Okay. You ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is approved. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Strader: We do not have any items moved from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT/ COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 14. Lakeview Golf Course Fees Discussion Strader: So, we will go ahead and start into our Department/Commission Reports. First up Item 13 is the Lakeview Golf Course fees discussion and we will recognize Garrett White. White: Council Woman Strader -- Council Woman Strader and Council thanks for having me tonight. I'm here to talk to you about proposed golf fees for next year. The golf course is looking beautiful out there. So, I got to give Ryan, who is in the audience right now, him and Kevin some kudos out there. I had the opportunity to drive the golf course with him a couple weeks ago and it was awesome. This looks so good -- so good out there. But tonight really what I'm looking for from you is really just any discussion or feedback if there is any and/or head nods or thumbs up type of thing. Once we discuss these the kind of the game plan is is to post these and, then, come back in a few weeks for a public hearing. So, this is really just the beginning of the process and just kind of getting that discussion going with you guys. This year the methodology behind the adjustments were basically based on inflationary trends and competitive pricing. The target was about four percent increase across the board through all of our fees. Some of the bullet points that we have on there was really just to kind of -- for simplicity, route them to the nearest whole dollar after tax. If they come up to repay with cash we are not dealing with coins and stuff like that at the counter. And the private cart trail fees gets an increase. Different methodology on that. The break-even point is about 41 for the unlimited single person golfer that go out there. So, we kind of made that same methodology and same mathematical equation to come up with that fee this year as well. Annual passes up four percent through that as well and, then, just kind of did the basic senior and military discount out there. So, that's what we wanted to go through and kind of get your guys' feedback on -- we did look at doing this as comparables to Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 4 of 23 the Treasure Valley and different golf courses around and this -- the increase puts us at really right at the average of everything else. So, we are not the most expensive not, the least expensive, but right in the middle. So, with that feedback I will stand for questions. Strader: Okay. Thank you, Garrett. Council, are there any questions? Overton: Council Vice-President? Strader: Yes, Councilman Overton. Overton: Garrett -- and to both of you, I want to give you a huge kudos once again. I had the opportunity to help with the setup of one of the golf tournaments this summer a couple of months ago and in so doing that got to drive early in the morning every hole in the golf course and, you know, you can go to the clubhouse, you can go to the driving range and you can see how beautiful the golf course looks, but when you get to see all 18 holes and how it looks the same all the way throughout, it's impressive that we have done such a great job and the course looks so good and I know the history of our city and when we ask for money we have always been extremely conservative and -- and fiscally -- we don't ask for much. We try to ask for just enough money to make it continue to work and I look at these fee increases that you are requesting and I know that we are just trying to keep up with our costs and provide to the public what they expect out of us and do it in the most fiscally responsible manner and I appreciate you bringing forward these fees. We need to. We need to continue to work towards cost recovery. But I appreciate the way that you bring these forward for us. Thank you. White: Thank you. Appreciate that. Strader: Okay. Thank you, Councilman Overton. Cavener: Council Vice-President Strader? Strader: Council President Cavener, go ahead. Cavener: Thank you. Garrett, just -- I want to make sure that I heard this at the parks tour the other night. The -- the golf course -- not taking into account, obviously, the significant capital infrastructure investment, but the golf course continues to operate now in the black when you don't factor in the cost of the -- kind of the large scale capital improvements; is that correct? White: Correct. Cavener: Okay. Again, to echo Council Member Overton's comments, to -- to operate a great facility, to have it looking great, running great, operating great is really a testament to our whole parks team. So, thanks for reinforcing that point and -- and thanks for a job well done. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 5 of 23 White: Thank you for the comments and thanks for going on the tour. It was fun. And, again, Ryan get -- and Kevin get all the kudos. Those -- those guys do just a great job and his staff-- staff out there is always pleasant and awesome, so -- Strader: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Thank you Vice-President. Garrett, Ryan, can't say enough about what a great job and how wonderful the golf course looks. It's -- it's been a long road I know for you guys from, you know, when we started with the change in the water -- actually started to get the golf course back, so that Meridian was in control of our own property. And so it's been quite the journey. But well done. Very very well done. And so, of course, I agree with the -- the fees going up. We do need to do our best to recoup the costs. So, thank you. White: Thank you. Whitlock: Madam Vice-President Strader? Strader: Councilman Whitlock, yes, go ahead. Whitlock: Garrett, like Council President Cavener, I appreciated the tour last week and the opportunity to be out on the site. It was -- it's beautiful. The statistics of how much grass seed you have laid this past year, it's -- it's paying off. It -- the -- the grass has sprouted. It's green. It's beautiful. But for me probably the best image last week was looking at all the high school kids out there. We had a golf team from one of the high schools that literally they were touching the grass, getting in touch with the grass, no shoes, walking out on the putting green and, you know, I thought about that later that night and I thought, you know, here is kids in our community that are in touch with a wholesome sport and a wholesome activity and we are providing that opportunity and it was really an incredible image. They are learning a lifelong sport and -- and developing a love for that right here in our -- in our community. So, that image stayed with me that night and throughout the week and I just want to commend you for having an amenity like that in our community that our youth and some of us older people can enjoy. White: Yeah. Thank you. And, then, again, that's Ryan Roberts. He -- he promotes our youth program so well. I mean he does such a good job at it. Him and his crew out there they are just very welcoming and approachable and the kids love it. So, thank you for those comments. Strader: Okay. Thank you. I will just add appreciate all that you are doing on the golf course, especially to try to make it as self-sustaining as possible. I think that's important. I understand we don't like fees going up, but it's kind of the cost of doing business and part of our cost recovery model. Do you feel like you have the right feedback from us, Garrett? Do you want to see some thumbs up from people that the fees are tracking generally? Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 6 of 23 White: I feel like I have gotten great feedback. So, what -- I think my plan would be to post these and, then, come back in a few weeks for public hearing and at that point we can discuss more stuff that we need to be, so -- Strader: Fantastic. Thank you so much. White: Thank you guys. Appreciate it. 15. Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Presentation and Discussion Strader: Okay. All right. Great. Next up is Item 14, the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee presentation and discussion, which will be led by Caleb Hood and Justin Lucas. Hood: Council Vice-President Strader, I actually don't have too much of an intro as Justin comes forward, but I did want to take a minute before he explains their process for developing their impact fees and the capital improvements plan and just thank him first for being here today, but also last Tuesday for hanging out with us for a few hours. And, then, I also wanted to call to your attention -- we do have the Transportation Commission Chair Walter Steed also in the audience, who is the city's representative on ACHD's CICAC, so Capital Improvement Citizen Advisory Committee. So, Mr. Steed was -- I told him this was happening, he was generous enough to give us his time. So, he has got the perspective and has sort of been part of the process at ACHD that Justin is going to tell you more about as I get his presentation up. Strader: Okay. Thank you so much. Lucas: Well, I will go ahead and get started. For the record my name is Justin Lucas. I'm the chief of operations and infrastructure at the Ada County Highway District. It's really a pleasure to be with you here today to discuss ACHD's capital improvements plan and our impact fee program. There is a lot of history in this program and this plan has been under development for over a year now and so it's something we do every four years and we will do it four years from now. As we continue to grow as a region this plan allows us to, essentially, charge developers to pay for the costs of widening roads that are associated with growth. Essentially that's -- that's what it does. I know the city has impact fee programs associated with other services and it's not uncommon for regions or cities or counties to have a transportation impact fee. So, this is, you know, work session. Meant to be conversational. If you have any questions as I go please feel free to just interrupt me and I will do my best to answer the questions. No reason to wait until the end. Hopefully this can -- I'm here to take -- listen to feedback and, then, if the city chooses to take any formal action or provide formal feedback I'm sure your staff will work with you on that. Let's see here. There we go. So, as I mentioned, this is -- this was a pretty big process for us. We are working with a consulting firm, Kittelson and Associates, who is navigating through this with us. They are a transportation consulting firm that specializes in regional transportation analysis, Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 7 of 23 including model analysis, growth projections and projecting traffic into the future to determine what needs we have into the future. It's kind of a crystal ball sometimes, but we use demographics that come from COMPASS, our regional transportation agency. ACHD does not develop its own develop -- demographic set. That is all run through COMPASS, which all of our communities participate in, including the City of Meridian. So, we did a best practice review. We went through some significant project development analysis. Most recently we developed project cost analysis and we are right now in the -- in the kind of final phases of our -- of our draft and I wanted to highlight two main things today as part of this draft that are changes I would say from -- from previous drafts of our -- of our capital improvements plan. The first one is a service area. As we develop a plan under state code, which governs the process for this, ACHD has to identify a service area for the fees that we collect. Since 2012 ACHD has had a single service area. So, fees collected through the development process anywhere in the county could be spent at the direction of the ACHD Commission anywhere in the county. The single service area is supported by the data which essentially shows that over 90 percent of trips within Ada county stay within Ada county. As part of this analysis the ACHD Commission, including feedback from the Capital Investment Citizens Advisory Committee, asked us to look at different service area options, which we did and there were a few different ones. We looked at three primary. One was the single service area to continue with that model. The other was what I'm showing to you on the screen today, which happens to be -- the current draft is being based on this at the commission's direction. The third one was an overlay zone that kind of primarily captured a portion of -- kind of the downtown -- greater downtown Boise area. The thing about service areas is they have to be developed based on sound engineering and transportation principles. You can't just draw the lines how you want. That's not how it works under Idaho Code. You have to be able to show why the service areas are -- are distinct based on the travel patterns and characteristics of the -- of the -- of the service area. So, this -- this service area in front of you today has a west and an east. It's essentially a two service area model. So, fees collected in the west are spent on projects in the west. Fees collected in the east are spent on projects in the east. Now, when you do this, though, you can have different impact fees in -- in the different services areas and that is a result of the two service area model is essentially higher impact fees in the western service area and lower impact fees in the eastern service area. The reason behind that is the number of projects in those two areas. There are a lot more projects in the western service area than there are in the eastern service area. So, once again, the impact fee calculation is essentially a math problem developed based on travel characteristics and project cost. The higher -- the more amount of projects -- the more projects you want to get done, the higher the fee essentially which is why there is a discrepancy there. So, I will pause there, see if you have any questions about service areas. This -- the -- the Commission essentially gave us direction to move forward with the two service areas for the draft. They have not made their final decision. I'm presenting this today to allow for the city to understand that we are making a change and to certainly take any questions you may have and encourage you to reach out to the commission formally if you have any concerns with this this paradigm. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 8 of 23 Strader: Okay. Whitlock: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Yes, Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Just a quick question. What is the difference between the two? You probably have that in your slide. Lucas: Here we go. Whitlock: Okay. Lucas: Let's -- let's jump right into it. You can see we have total project cost, total impact fee eligible cost. Those are the two top line items there. Not all aspects of a project by state law are impact fee eligible. So, that's why there is those two separate -- two separate rows there. But you can see for -- this is just using a representative sample of the impact fees. So, a single family home is a relatively easy one to understand. For one single family home in the western service area the resultant impact fee would be 8,929 dollars. In the eastern service area it's 5,348 dollars. I can anticipate a question of what is it today. It's a little under 4,000 dollars today, which -- for a single service area. So, there is no change. So, it's a relatively substantial increase that we are proposing. There is some reasons behind that, which I can go into. Also the office and shopping center you can see the differences there, which are also increases about the same scale of magnitude as the single family home. Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: Justin, I understand the reason for the split this year, but it would sure be nice -- and I realized you are not looking for our approval, this is just a discussion with us, but it would sure be nice to not just see the west and the east service areas, but actually to see what this would look like if it was still all one area and what those fees would look like across the entire Ada county. Lucas: Madam President, Councilman Overton, we can provide that information to staff and I can look back at Megan. We have the -- the calculations. I'm going to give you a close estimate today. Don't -- don't quote me on it, but, essentially, if you take kind of the average of the two, it -- it turns -- it's -- it's in that like 7,000 dollar range if for a single family home if we go to -- if we continue with the single service area. So, you are kind of splitting the difference and that's based on just taking all the project costs and allocating them across the -- across one single service area. So, it's still -- what I would consider a significant increase, but it -- it's not -- there is no discrepancy if you have just the one service area. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 9 of 23 Strader: Okay. Cavener: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Yes, Council President Cavener. Cavener: Justin, in your opening comments you remarked that the Commission made a shift in -- I think you said 2012. What was the basis for the Commission making the shift in -- in 2012? Lucas: Councilman Cavener, you know, thanks for that question. Going back to 2012, 1 -- I believe at that time -- before then the Commission had -- we had four service areas within our county pre-2012. At that time based on the engineering data and the analysis that we performed we realized that the single service area was supported by the data. It also, when you have a single service area, provides more flexibility to do larger projects when you don't constrain it by service area, because you can imagine -- let's say there is a large project in the eastern service area, which is collecting a lower fee and the development isn't maybe moving as rapidly as anticipated, you could find yourself in a position where you have a desire to do a project, but do not have the revenue to do that project when you have a service area model with multiple service areas and that happened to the -- happened to ACHD under the multiple service area scenario before. I'm not saying that will happen again. I'm just saying that was one of the -- probably primary reasons for the single service area was flexibility to allow the Commission, who directs the funds -- to direct those funds anywhere in the county where they had the most benefit based on the budgetary and needs of the transportation system. The other reason at that time was -- I think it's safe to say feedback from the development community that it was confusing to the developers across Ada county why they were paying one fee in one area and another fee in a different area. That's -- that was feedback the commission received. I think at that time they were sensitive to that feedback and used that as part of their decision making process to go to the single service area. Regardless of that, the service areas have to be justified by sound engineering and planning principles and the single service area still we believe meets that criteria, along with this two service area model. We think we can get there based on our work with the consultant. Does that answer your question, councilman? Cavener: Yeah. Madam Vice-President. It -- it certainly does, Justin, although I -- when I hear your explanation I feel like some of the problems that the commission looked to solve 13 years ago, it's kind of being re-invited back in. Lack of consistency. Dollars landing in one place. Maybe projects not following. So, I just -- I guess I'm just trying to understand kind of what changed and why -- kind of going back to a model that you used to do is -- is the right decision today when you spent so much time and analysis 12 years ago to -- to essentially make a -- make a switch. Lucas: Council President, Councilman Cavener, I think it's a fair question. I think that's the type of feedback that would be valuable for our commissioners to hear. Staff -- you Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 10 of 23 know, we -- we respond to, you know, our commissioners and try to provide them with options and, then, they ultimately provide us with direction. I think staff, with the consultant, provided three viable service area scenarios to the commissioners. We did our best to show the pros and cons. I think if there was one theme that has come out through the conversations, it's a sense of fairness that has been communicated -- communicated by some citizens and some jurisdictions to our commissioners, feeling that it's not fair for fees to be collected in one place to be spent far away from that place. That's probably the primary driver for the multiple service area scenario conversation that we have had going through this. Ultimately service areas is a -- it's a policy decision and that's why we are here sharing that. Early on in the process, so you are aware, this would change and someone doing a development in southeast Boise would have a different fee than someone doing a development in northwest Meridian. Cavener: Madam Vice-President, just maybe one more question and, then, I will -- I will yield the rest of my time. Strader: Go ahead. Cavener: Justin, can you talk a little bit about the -- the mechanism or the basis to determine these fees; right? When I see in the west service area close to 9,000 dollars for a single family unit, you know, three times that is essentially what you are charging for commercial retail and I'm just trying to understand the methodology that you use to establish what the -- the fee amount is. It -- it appears to me that it's heavily lopsided on homeowners and there may be a basis for that although, I think of some of our retail places that are large drivers of traffic, you would -- you would think that there was maybe a more proportional share of those impact fees. So, if you could walk me through the basis and methodology that the district used to determine these. Lucas: Yeah. Thank you, Councilman Cavener, Council President. So, it's -- it's essentially, a function of trip generation that is the primary driver when it comes to the different land use types of the fee. I do want to clarify that the shopping center fee is per one thousand square feet. So, if a Costco comes in it's not paying 18,000 dollars as its impact fee in the city of Meridian, it would be the square footage of that Costco per one thousand of those square feet times the 18,000 dollars. So, that's just a clarifying point. With a single family home it's -- it's essentially -- no matter what size the home is it's a single family home and it pays one -- one fee. So, I do want to make that distinction that -- for example, we have received fees on the commercial side in the millions of dollars this year from large developments, like Micron, where they are doing massive square footage. It's a huge employment generator and St. Luke's is another example downtown and other large developments, they pay -- they can pay very substantial fees just straight dollar amounts. So, that would be my first caveat there. And, then, the other thing is -- I was mentioning is -- is that the fees are just based on trip generation. So, every land use type -- and I did include this in your packet -- there is a whole laundry list of different land use types and we use that -- that -- that laundry list, essentially using trip generation from the Highway Capacity Manual, which is a nationally recognized and created engineering tool, that helps us know in general on Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 11 of 23 average this is how many trips a daycare generates. This is how many trips a fast casual restaurant generates. This is how many trips this generates. And as you can imagine we have to have a sense of kind of fairness where one restaurant comes in and we just don't say, well, you are this type of restaurant and because you serve this type of food you are going to get this fee. It doesn't work like that. It's based on these national standards. So, that's kind of my response to that. The other major factors that drive the fee are the -- the projects overall that we need to do to accommodate all this growth in our county projected over the next 20 years and that's probably the -- the largest driver. Getting into why the fees have changed so much, we haven't done a substantial review of our cost estimates within our CIP since before COVID and all of us I think can recognize that inflation since, you know, 2019, 2020, has been a -- not only an issue locally, but an issue nationally and when we did this comprehensive review this -- with this update, the project costs for both construction and right of way acquisition were substantial and that is probably -- if there was one variable that is driving this fee it's the cost of constructing the projects. Does that help answer your question, councilman? Cavener: Thank you, Justin. I appreciate it. Strader: Okay. Thank you. I would like to ask if -- if our Transportation Commission Chair Steed would like to come and say a few words if he had any input. We definitely value the opinion of our Transportation Commission and commissioners and I think would love to hear what the interaction has been and if you have any thoughts about what all this would mean. Steed: Thank you, Madam Council Woman. The Transportation Commission has not discussed this at this point. As was said, it went through the CICAC. It came down four to three for a single. One small community represented in the CICAC wanted a single for the reason that Justin's already explained, the fairness of my money, your money. The others -- a couple of them felt that they had not been on the CICAC long enough to fully understand it. I'm not sure being on a long time will help anybody fully understand it. A personal comment. When I was on the city council in Moscow for ten years I was firmly against these fees, because we had maybe one ten house subdivision a year and my feeling was that these would slow even that little bit down. Here I'm not sure this fee increase will slow anything down. So, it's -- it's -- there is that element as well. Strader: Thank you so much. That was very helpful. Does anyone have any questions for Commissioner Steed? Okay. I don't either. Thank you. Steed: Thank you, ma'am. Strader: Appreciate your input. Justin, I had a question for you. What would this mean for the five year work plan if it were to become effective? Lucas: Thank you, Council President, Members of the Council. So, with a higher fee, if all other things being equal, which means the rate of development stays the same, Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 12 of 23 because if -- if development slows down it doesn't matter how high the fee is, we don't collect the fees if there is no houses being built. So, assuming things remain the same, ACHD would see a pretty substantial increase in its impact fee collections annually. Impact fees by law have to be spent on capital improvements that are identified in our capital improvements plan, which are, essentially, arterial roadway widening projects and intersection projects. So, following that logic, if we have more fee collections and those fees are able to be spread out to support more projects, ACHD is -- by law essentially has to spend those fees on more projects. So, I think one logical conclusion of this in my long winded way of saying this is, you know, the idea is that more fees would lead to more construction of major arterial projects to support the growth in our county. Strader: Okay. Thanks. That -- that makes sense. That is logical. But I -- I think it would be helpful if we had maybe a sense of your timeline and kind of what your process looks like and, then, just a minor correction in the City Council Vice-President. Council President Cavener has the illustrious title of being our council president. I'm just filling in since he is remote tonight. Lucas: Thank you for that -- Strader: Thank you. Overton: Council Vice-President? Strader: Yes. Go ahead. Overton: Justin, are these fees based on -- I mean we just submitted our letter on a five year work plan. Do I understand that these fees that we are looking at now that you are adopting are based on a -- more of a 20 year plan? Lucas: Yeah. Council Vice-President, Councilman Overton, absolutely. The -- the five year plan is a -- is connected to our capital improvements plan as an implementation tool related to the capital improvements plan, but the capital improvements plan is a -- is a stand-alone document that has a 20 year kind of vision included in it and what it does is it does not outline all projects that ACHD is going to work on, it outlines the arterial projects, the regional essential projects and the intersect -- major intersection projects that are eligible for impact fees and that is defined by state law. We -- we are not able to collect impact fees, for example, to retrofit a sidewalk into a neighborhood that doesn't have sidewalks today. That's not an impact fee eligible expense that we are able to collect fees on or expend fees on. These fees essentially by state law have to be spent on the clear nexus of growth and, essentially, transportation impacts on the arterial network. So, roadway widening and intersection widening. So, it's not a comprehensive 20 year plan, but when it comes to the expensive projects it's got them all in there and some of them are extremely expensive. In the -- we are -- we are approaching a period -- and like it's hard for me to say this in my career, never thought I would, but we are looking at projects, due to increased costs, that are over 20 million Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 13 of 23 dollars. Some of our projects -- these are large projects, but they may be over a hundred million dollars. For example, the widening of Linder Road between Chinden and Highway, 44, there is multiple, bridges multiple river crossings, it's an extremely environmentally sensitive project. A project like that based on our most current estimates is about a hundred million dollars and if we are -- if you do the math and we are collecting let's say on a -- in a great year, which this year's probably the largest collections we have ever had, is 30 million dollars in impact fees. It's going to take us a while with all the needs to build a project like that if we are collecting -- even if we are collecting 30 million a year, which is a very high year for us, the highest we have ever had. So, the needs are substantial. You can see the needs are in the billions of dollars of projects that are identified as needed within 20 years. Overton: Council Vice-President. Strader: Yes. Overton: Quick -- quick follow up, Justin. I guess one of the things that you can probably explain to me is -- is when we look at this 20 year capital improvement, you are basing the fees off what you guys think you are looking at for 20 years and in my understanding early on -- and I'm not trying to put you on the spot -- is that Black Cat Road does not exist on that 20 year plan. If we are looking at a five year plan, do we really get to make effective changes on the five year plan as it comes in front of us if you have already identified all these on the 20 year plan coming forward? I mean could we really make effective change if we see the needs of our city coming forward or when you do this based on your 20 year plan are you kind of telling us this is the roadway and this is where we are going and thank you for your input? Lucas: Council Vice-President, Councilman Overton, you know, I -- I appreciate that question. I think it's a good one. I would put it this way. By designating these projects in our 20 year plan we are essentially saying this is what the -- this is what our transportation model and our needs analysis shows us that we need within 20 years. The five year plan, essentially, is the tool that we use to prioritize those 20 year needs. So, I would say that the city has a -- especially -- especially moving forward under our current director's leadership, has a -- a clear ability to identify priorities and its ACHD's intention to work on those priorities. Now, I can't say we are going to get it all done, you know, next year, but, for example, if the city has a priority of one or two or three, that project -- it's our intention should be moving forward within our five year plan. That's -- that's -- I think there is always going to be some caveats and some qualifiers to a statement like that, but what I can tell you is that is the intention that we have. For example, I think if you looked at your top three priorities on your most current list, those should and would be moving forward in our plan. Now, are there other important projects where there may be some congestion that fall outside of that top three or four or five priorities? Sure, there are. Much like there are in most communities across the United States and our intention is as we knockout those top priorities and those start to ramp up the list that we would focus -- focus in those areas. That's -- that's -- that's what we are trying to do. I think the Linder Road overpass is probably a -- a good Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 14 of 23 example of that, a very expensive project where I do not want to in any way diminish the city's contributions to that project, which I think helped move it forward. State contributions to that project through the award of a grant, which helped move it forward. So, I think high priority projects tend to have energy behind them and tend to move forward. If the city is -- I would say this: If the city is consistently asking for it. And that hasn't always been the case with all of our community partners. If the number one priority is changing every year and you kind of get these fits and starts, that certainly has an impact on the project process. Hood: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Yes. Hood: Justin, can I rephrase maybe what Council -- Councilman Overton asked. A little bit different. We will use Black Cat or -- or even McMillan. That's been talked about, too. If the CIP has it as a three lane roadway, but the city's looking forward to potentially be five what are the impacts of your CIP identifying it as -- as one thing -- same -- same roadway section, but different cross-section, how does that play into your answer that you just gave about our priorities? Lucas: I -- I think it's a -- it's a really good question and this goes into some of the weeds of the CIP. As I said, the CIP is based on transportation modeling and it's based on demographic data and it's based on trip projections into the future and there are times when the trip projections on a certain corridor do not reach the threshold of the ultimate vision that a city or even ACHD may have for that corridor. I think in this specific CIP Black Cat Road is a really good example, where in previous CIPs that road has triggered a need for five lane widening. In this CIP through the analysis it didn't trigger that need and, remember, this isn't ACHD behind the scenes, you know, secretly hoping Black Cat doesn't go to five lanes. It doesn't work like that. It's, essentially, a county wide model and a trip generation that just says it's either -- it's either tripping the threshold or it's not based on this 20 year projection. Black Cat's interesting -- and it was likely significantly impacted by the inclusion and the construction of Highway 16. We anticipate Highway 16 will have some impacts on traffic along parallel corridors within let's say two or three miles of that corridor. Even Ten Mile Road is likely to see some impact from Highway 16. Ten Mile is so busy that even if you drive it every day you may not notice, because it still will likely be congested, especially at the peak hour. But people traveling to Emmett, Gem county and other areas -- Caldwell and other areas in the northwestern part of -- of our Treasure Valley, they will be using Highway 16 where they may be using Ten Mile today and it's not a small amount of people that -- that make those trips. So, I -- I use that as an example to say -- to say, yes, that does happen. Does that impact ACHD's emphasis on a corridor? I would say that's probably fair. And if the city really were to prioritize Black Cat Road as its number one priority under these circumstances, I think it would be good to have a conversation about why the city's, you know, so excited about Black Cat, but let's say we were going to go do a project on Black Cat and it showed three lanes in our CIP, we would likely build it at five lanes, because our master street map, our long term vision, shows it as a five lane road Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 15 of 23 and the reason we would do that is because we know that even long term this is just 20 years -- beyond 20 years I think there is a general -- there has been a general agreement that these section line arterials, you know, should be five lanes within the city of Meridian. That has been brought forward by Meridian and it's been accepted by the ACHD commission. So, what would happen in that situation is the impact fees collected would only be able to pay for the segment of Black Cat up to three lanes and, then, it would have to be nonimpact fees that were to cover the difference. That's essentially how it happens behind the scenes. That has happened on -- on a few occasions through ACHD's previous projects. Not all that often, but it has happened on occasion. So, that's kind of how it -- how it works. The CIP in and of itself is not a -- it's primarily a tool to lay out the needs over 20 years as defined by the model and in compliance with state law, so that we can collect impact fees. It is not a master vision of what every single road is going to be in its ultimate configuration. If -- if that -- if that helps or makes sense. Strader: Okay. And, then, I had asked a question previously just about timing, process. You are looking for input from us I guess on anything specifically it would be good to know. But, yeah, if you want to walk us through those items. Lucas: Yeah. Absolutely. Let me see here if I have got a next steps. So, where we are right now is we are in the draft development stage. We will be bringing the draft to our commissioners with this similar information. They have gotten a lot of updates, obviously -- later this month in September. So, once we have that we are actually going to publish a formal draft for formal review by the public and our partners. We wanted to offer these presentations so you had kind of a preview of what's coming, so you weren't caught off guard by anything. That's our intention. So, I would say during that -- over the September and October time frame, if the city wanted to weigh in on some of those bigger issues, I think that would be the ideal time to do that. I think city input on the service areas is very important for our -- our commissioners to hear one way or the other. On the two service area idea I think it's very important and I think if there is any concern by the city related to the -- the increase in fee, it's also fair. There is ways to -- the way you decrease the fee, you just remove projects from the plan. That's, essentially, the way to decrease the fee is you say we understand they are needed, but we are just saying we are not going to build them, which brings the fee down and so I think the plan is aggressive. There is a lot of projects in there, but that's kind of the -- the framework that we are in right now. So, I would say those are probably the two primary areas where feedback from the city would be most impactful and, then, if there is any other questions related to projects, I think we are glad to take any and all feedback related to that. Strader: Okay. Thank you. I think that's helpful. I'm -- I'm sure that we -- we might have some comments once we have a chance to dig into the -- the service areas especially. I think there is a fair amount of analysis that actually we should put into that. I just had one more question and, then, I will check with my fellow council what other questions they might have to round us out, but is it accurate to say that the impact fees overall for our area are approximately doubling? Is that -- is that about right? Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 16 of 23 Lucas: I -- I think it's -- it may be even a little more than that, but, yeah, that's -- that's -- it's more than -- more than double is -- is an accurate -- accurate assessment. It's a -- it's a pretty significant change. As I -- I tried to lay out some of the reasons for that, today, but -- but, yes, it is a -- it is a significant change. Strader: Okay. it sounds like a pretty big deal. With that I will just check, does anyone have any final questions or comments? Okay. All right. Thank you so much. We will be in touch. Lucas: Thanks you. Thanks. 16. Fiscal Year 2026 Citywide Fee Update Strader: Okay. Thank you. With that we will head into Item 15 the fiscal year 2026 citywide fee update and recognize Jenny Fields. Fields: Good evening, Members of the Council. I think my fellow teammate is pulling up our presentation. So, as they are doing that I'm going to maybe kick us off. We are going to continue the fee theme tonight by updating you guys on our fiscal year 2026 fee update for the citywide. Can I navigate? Thank you. Okay. Agenda tonight. So, the purpose of our today's presentation is that we are going to provide an overview of what we have done so far with our citywide fee update process and, then, we are going to explain some cost recovery methodologies that we use and, then, highlight what our goal is with our annual fee update and, then, there are several departments that have fee adjustment proposals that ranges across multiple departments that you are going to see. Then we will round it up with our next steps. So, tonight we are looking for feedback. In your packet and in your handout is the full list that includes multiple departments that we have handed out of our entire fee list for tonight. So, our fee development process -- so, Finance have worked with each department to determine the full cost recovery amount for each user fee. So, we started with the cost analysis for each service. This is done by identifying what factors or costs components are used that impact each fee. We -- they -- there are such things like staff time, how much staff time does it require to process each of these fees. We also consider material costs and, then, there is also some of them -- like city clerk's department have other agency costs associated with that fee that impacts the amount that goes into that fee. The results have been prepared and have been sent to Mayor for review and feedback. Mayor has provided department service feedback and that gets us to where we are currently at today. We have consolidated the entire list and is requesting Council review and feedback tonight. So, let's dig into our cost recovery methodology. Based on our policy here is the list of our different cost recovery levels. So, full costs recovery means that the fee is set to recover a hundred percent of the cost that is providing that service. So, we apply this method whenever appropriate. So, we come up with the full cost first and, then, determine, hey, do we adjust it to have a lower percentage of cost recovery? This is to ensure that the user, since these are user fees, not the general taxpayer pays for the service that primarily benefits the individual, so, as Council you guys have the option to elect or to apply a different cost recovery based on either public benefit, it's Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 17 of 23 totally up to you, but what we present is a full cost -- what it costs the city to process that particular fee. So, on your list there are several departments that you will see. On the far right you will see that the cost recovery method is indicated for each fee. Okay. So, why are we doing this and what is the goal of all this; right? So, many of these user fees have never been formally calculated, so they remain outdated. There are some departments that you will see that they have not adjusted their fees for over a decade. So, our goal is to perform this annual fee analysis every year. This will allow us to keep pace, like you have heard inflation driven increases, such as our personnel costs, our material costs, so I understand that the -- the list in front of you have giant or large percentage increases. That is because it hasn't been updated for between eight to ten years between these four departments. I'm going to go through each of these departments and give you some more detail. So, it's going to follow the list that you have in front of you starting with city clerks. So, tonight there are four departments that have fee adjustment proposals for your consideration. City clerks has a total of 34 fees. The last time that the clerk's department have updated their fee is in a 2017 resolution. Some of the cost factors that we used to calculate these fees are -- majority of it is staff time and, then, there are some pass-through agency fees, such as from the state or the federal government. The next department that you will see on the list is the fire department. The fire department's last update was back in 2019. They have a total of 17 fees. The primary cost factor that drives these fees is personnel time, staff time, personnel costs I mean. Police. Police has a handful -- has the least amount of fees. They have a total of 11 fees. Last time that the police department updated their fee schedule is back in 2017. So, eight years ago. They include cost calculations of staff time, so personnel costs, as well as material costs in their fees. The biggest part of the list that you see tonight is from our planning department. Planning department has a total of 57 fees. This department haven't seen a fee update for over a decade. The cost factors primarily driven by personnel costs or staff time associated with those each costs. There are 29 fees that have a greater -- five percent increase to them. Okay. So, I know this is a lot of data that's in front of you, you probably need some time to chew over, but our next step is we collect your guys' feedback tonight, maybe make some adjustments and, then, our next step is to put it out on the paper and do a -- a comment period via public hearing before we adopt. So, this is just the beginning of our discussion process and, then, these fees we are not looking to be effective until 2026. Strader: Okay. Thank you so much, Jenny -- Fields: Yeah. Strader: -- for providing this information. Council, over to you for comments and questions. Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Overton. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 18 of 23 Overton: You know, I -- without having the background story, any person that looks at these fees is going to think what are we doing? I mean some of these -- hundred, two hundred, three hundred percent increase. I think we are kind of guilty as a city that we didn't stay on top of these fees and do them every two years to keep them current, so that when we did a fee increase it would be a much more reasonable, but there is a cost associated with doing the study I'm sure to figure out what your increase is going to be. I know from my previous time working with the city that every time we do these cost recoveries and we do these fee increases we are still trying to be as fiscally conservative as we can be. We are not trying to gouge the public. But I think we really need to tell the story and putting fee increases with these numbers behind them we need to tell that story crystal clear so people understand just how long it's been since we have done one and what's happened since that point in time. I'm supportive. I think we need to do it. I think we needed to do it a long time ago and it wouldn't have been numbers as high as we see today. Strader: Thank you, Councilman Overton. Cavener: Council Vice-President? Strader: Yes, please, go ahead Council President Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Council Vice-President Strader. Jenny, I kind of maybe want to pick up where Council Member Overton left off with maybe my first question, which is we have been told for years that finances and the departments are working in conjunction to bring fee updates on an annual basis. So, help me understand where the disconnect is occurring that we are going ten, 12 years in some departments before these fees are getting updated? Just being very frank, this feels like a complete failure on the city's part. When I look at a fee that is going up 2,930 percent is because we haven't touched this in 12 years when we as Council have been told we are going to be bringing these on an annual basis. So, I will start there and -- and maybe ask why -- why we haven't been doing this when you -- when the Council has been told this is the plan. Fields: Councilman -- Council Woman Strader. Strader: Go ahead. Fields: Councilman President Cavener, the delay came down to -- to be frank, time and resources. This sat in -- in our back burner while we tackle some urgent needs. It is by no means an oversight, it's just the -- the lack of time and resources that we had. Cavener: Okay. I -- I guess I -- I would like to get some larger understanding. It doesn't have to be right now -- Fields: Okay. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 19 of 23 Cavener: -- as to what those time and resources that are -- that are getting in the way of doing this, because it's one thing that we are not, it's another thing when you tell the Council that you are going to be doing these things and there isn't any communication to us that we aren't. I have real struggles that we are going to introduce a fee that goes up 3,000 percent, because the city has failed to communicate appropriately. So, that's some initial feedback. Second question is about cost recovery. So, when I look at the -- the Excel sheet that you have presented to us, if it says in that final column a hundred percent, am I safe to assume that that means that as presented that is a hundred percent of the fee recovery? Fields: Correct. Cavener: Okay. So, when I look at, then, the clerk's office, a 34 percent fee recovery for a large scale special event, why are we only choosing to recover 34 percent of that? Fields: That's a -- a great question. Could you pull up the calculations? We have -- Strader: Just a moment, Council President Cavener. They are going to pull up a different presentation I think so we can all look at the spreadsheet that they provided earlier. Fields: All the way to the right. So, go to the right where it says minimum cost. Cavener: It looks like it's line maybe 30. Thirty-one. Thirty. Fields: So, the full costs -- I believe the full cost was 700 dollars. So, it was decided -- go ahead. The feedback that we received from Mayor was we are to elect to have a lower cost recovery, because the full cost was substantially larger than the previous fee for a TUP. Large scale events. Strader: So, it sounds like there was a decision -- at least at when this went to the Mayor, you are saying that the -- the Mayor's direction was to try to recover a lower percentage of the cost recovery model on these particular TUP items; is that accurate? Now we have got Director Lavoie, Council President Cavener, just FYI. Lavoie: Yes, Council, you are correct with that last statement though. We presented this to the Mayor. The Mayor reviews this. And we did a regional study on what the fees would be for like to like TUP large scale and our full cost recover is much larger than the regional average. So, it was decided to stay within the regional average and promote a -- I think it's 250 dollar -- yeah -- 250 dollar fee increase, rather than our full cost. We felt that the tolerance level for that 250 fee would be more acceptable than a four -- the 700 dollar fee that we fully calculated. So, that we could be still markedly attractive to the regional customers. Cavener: A couple follow-ups if I may. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 20 of 23 Strader: Please go ahead. Cavener: So, two-part question, then, Mr. Lavoie. Is this 34.9 percent consistent with our cost recovery model and, two, is our fees so high -- or our costs so high because of our costs -- I guess are the costs that the City of Meridian bears to process this type of a TUP the same level of cost that other municipalities are bearing? I guess, essentially, I'm asking are other municipalities subsidizing the cost of this fee and -- and we are choosing to follow suit? Lavoie: Mr. -- or Members of the Council, I will start with the second question first. We do not know the methodologies or -- methodologies or if any other agency in the valley does a full cost analysis on any of their fees. We can only compare our fees to the other fees. We did not do a complete analysis of how they conduct or how they calculate any of their fees. So, I -- I apologize, I don't know the answer to that second question that you have. The methodology of 33 percent -- again, it does fall within one of our five categories that we did provide to you. Again, we have the option to recover whatever percentage Council and/or Mayor wishes to select. We calculate as a practice on our side of the fence one hundred percent recovery so you are informed of what it costs to run our business. You and the Mayor can discuss and select a recovery percentage following our guidelines that we have in policy. So, yes, I would say this does fall within policy. It is a recommendation to you for this particular line item itself. Cavener: But following the plan -- sorry, Council Vice-President Strader, if I may. Strader: Yes. Cavener: Following the plan, though, it should be at a hundred percent. We have just made a subjective decision to lower it to remain competitive. Lavoie: I would agree with that last statement, yes. Cavener: Okay. And, then, just maybe one additional follow up then. In fire, daycare inspections, 50 percent, any background and history as to why we are not recovering the full cost on this one? Fields: Can you pull up the -- the calculation. Strader: Maybe while we are pulling that up I will just preview my -- my question is going to be what's the net fiscal impact for each of these departments if these fees were to be approved eventually? So, that's just to preview a question. Fields: Okay. Get back to you on that one. Strader: Sure. Go ahead. Fields: It is an Idaho Code that we can only recoup 25 dollars. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 21 of 23 Cavener: Okay. So, this one is not a case of it being subjective, it is we are -- the cost to operate this service exceeds what we are able to charge based on Idaho State Code. Fields: Correct. Cavener: Got it. That makes sense. Thank you. I think that concludes my questions. Strader: Okay. Fields: And Madam Vice-President Strader. Strader: Please. Fields: To answer your question about net fiscal impact, I don't have the answer tonight, but we can calculate and get back to you on that. Strader: Okay. Yeah. That -- that would be fantastic. You know, one thing that I think all of us have been noticing with the pressure around our operating costs and certainly we have seen a decrease in some construction activities, especially in the multi-family space, and so I think it -- it's an opportunity for us and a challenge to Council President Cavener's point that we haven't updated these fees in so long, I'm worried it's going to come as a big shock to people, but it does seem like it will help sort of support more through cycle resourcing of that function within the city. So, I think understanding the fiscal impact from these fees for each department would help us to see the big picture and, then, I -- I strongly I suspect that we will have follow-up questions on the individual fees as well. It looks like this will be, obviously, a full public process. What would the next steps be for us, Jenny? Fields: So, the next steps is I -- I collect your guys' input, do some adjustments based on your guys' select -- you know, your guidance and, then, we draft a resolution. So, this is anytime we have fees that are increasing from a certain percentage -- I believe five percent, we have to do a formal public hearing. So, we publish in the paper for two weeks, invite the public in for comment period and, then, do a full blown public hearing prior to adoption. Strader: Okay. And at least for initial feedback or questions about any individual fees or even just broad categories of fees, what kind of timing would you like from us on that in terms of Council getting back to you? Like two weeks? What -- what works with your schedule you are anticipating? Fields: I think two weeks is fair. I will leave it up to you guys. There is no urgency to -- I mean there is, because we haven't updated these fees for so long, but our goal is to get these effective fiscal year '26. So, there is a process where we have two weeks in the paper. So, there -- we are still a few weeks before adoption. So, if we can get -- collect all your guys' inputs, maybe a week or two, that would be super helpful. And, please, Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 22 of 23 direct them to -- to me or Ricardo and we will facilitate and get the subject matter experts if we can't answer them. Strader: Okay. So, for fellow Council Members, if -- if everyone can try to provide any follow-up questions or feedback about the fees by September 30th to Jenny and the Finance Department that would be super. Are there any other questions or comments from Council Members on this item? Okay. It looks like that's what we have got. Thank you so much. EXECUTIVE SESSION [Action Item] 17. Executive session per Idaho Code 74-206(1)(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code. Strader: Okay. With that that brings us to our Executive Session action item. Do I have a motion? Overton: Council Vice-President. Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: I move that we move into Executive Session per Idaho Code 74-206(1)(d). Little Roberts: Second. Strader: Okay. I have a motion and a second to go into Executive Session. All those in favor -- actually, I believe this is a vote. Let's go ahead and we will do a roll call vote on that. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, absent; Whitlock, yea. Strader: Okay. All ayes and the motion carries. We will now go into Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (5.35 p.m. to 5.59 p.m.) Overton: Madam Vice-President. Strader: Yes. We are going to need to come out of our Executive Session. Councilman Overton. Overton: I move that we come out of Executive Session. Little Roberts: Second. Meridian City Council Work Session September 16,2025 Page 23 of 23 Strader: Okay. We have a motion and a second to come out of Executive Session. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? Okay. The ayes have it and we are out of Executive session. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Strader: Do I have a motion to adjourn the work session? Overton: Madam Vice-President. Strader: Yes, Councilman Overton. Overton: Move that we adjourn our workshop. Little Roberts: Second. Strader: Okay. I have a motion and a second to adjourn the workshop. All in favor signify by signify by saying aye. Okay. Opposed? And we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.00 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) Robert E. Simison, Mayor 10-14-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 10-14-2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the September 2, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session September 2,2025 Page 26 of 26 Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I would appreciate the feedback from the community as we go through this. mean just understanding what -- you know, what we are doing and the impact on our partners who are working with us in the city. I actually like your suggestion, too, Councilman Whitlock, about sort of separating it out, because that's sort of the issue with the residential. Seems like what we deal with the most. But I do -- I would like that feedback from the community. Simison: Okay. Do you feel like we have got -- staff, do you feel like you have enough direction to take that and -- I know we have a representative from the BCA here, they have heard the conversation, so -- okay. Council, it's 5:50. Do we want to move on to the next item, bring it back in a future date? And I -- I say that -- we are not even through -- there is one or two more items that you want to have on this -- Bruce. Freckleton: No. Simison: Oh, that's it? Okay. Okay. We wrapped everything up into several items, so -- okay. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I -- I don't think we are going to have enough time to go into an Executive Session, so we will just -- we will do executive after our main meeting and so, Mr. Mayor, I would move that we adjourn this afternoon's work session. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn the work session. Is there any discussion? If not, on favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5.50 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) By Luke Cavener, Council President 9-16-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 9-16-2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the September 2, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council September 2,2025 Page 48 of 48 Simison: Or do I have a motion to go into Executive Session? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we go into Executive Session pursuant to Idaho State Code 74- 206(1)(b). Strader: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to go into Executive Session. Is there a discussion? If not clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and we will go into Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (9:09 p.m. to 10:03 p.m.) (Cavener/Strader out of Exec Session at 10:03) (Cavener/Strader adjourn at 10:03) MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:03 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) By Luke Cavener, Council President 9-16-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 9-16-2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Pine 43 West Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0109) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-060222 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 cfowler 09/17/2025 08:26:27 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Prgject Name or Subdivision Name: Pine 43 West S°aiih D Sewer& water Mein Easement Number: � Ident fs this hasewnl Iv sa},i iIw,I number If the P,�pJ,l eonmuns tnrrc Iran One ease rk]tt1 of this Ivye See inshuctions.{checklist Ibi additsi nal infunna§ion. For internal Use onh E SMT-2025-01 O9 Record Number: 5ANITLRY EMIR AND ATE R MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 16th day of _September 20 25 between DRB Investments, LIL - ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridiari. an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and propertylaereinafter particularly bounded and described, and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor-does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the fallowing described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and ) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities.together with their-maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. T O HAVE AND TO HOLD.D the said easement and right-of-way unto the said grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the panties hereto, that after risking repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. however,: Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or rjestoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. unitary Sewer and. Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences,trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and ofno further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: DRB Investments,LLC-Dennis Baker,Manager STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by Dennis Baker (name of individual), [complete the following ifsigning in a representative capacity, or strike thefollowing ifsigning in an individual capacity] on behalf of DRB Investments,LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notar}St❑m �Id11l111l11//// a o•. s 't ? MY COMMISSION E Notary Signature s ;EXPIRES U-24-20 : E My Commission Expires: ��sTq?E OF /��� i�8`R;``\�� Sanitary Sewer and Water iv{"M 9asement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 E N G I N E E R I N G km August 19,2025 Project No.25-020 City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement being a portion of Lots 4,5,and 6 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision(Book 12 of Plats,Page 665),situated in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 8,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 8,which bears S89°59'17"E a distance of 2,652.59 feet from a found brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 8,thence following the northerly line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, N89°59'17"W a distance of 999.04feet; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00'00'43"W a distance of 229.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence S00°32'35"W a distance of 17.35 feet; Thence S8444'12"E a distance of 139.94 feet; Thence 562°14'12"E a distance of 35.60 feet; Thence N50°15'48"E a distance of 21.90 feet to the southwesterly right-of-way of N.Webb Way; Thence following said southwesterly right-of-way,S43'25'39"E a distance of 52.99 feet; Thence leaving said southwesterly right-of-way,S46.34'21"W a distance of 38.70 feet; Thence N41.51'41"W a distance of 38.73 feet; Thence N62°14'12"W a distance of41.39 feet; Thence N8444'12"W a distance of 154.38 feet; Thence N00.32'35"E a distance of 35.76 feet, Thence S89°27'25"E a distance of 20.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 6,172 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of- way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. ONPILAN9 \CENSFp z � o 1 A 91f or SOP Z WAS $/l9/2U25 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939• kmengllp.com P:\25-020\SURVEY\CAD\EXHIBITS\25-020 CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER WATER EASEMENT 08.18.2025.D WG,KOBE ZIMMERMAN,8/19/2025,DWG TO PDF.PC3,08.5X11 L IPDF1 DO n TN O Z M m COB ODO Nv IW r'r1 M N m N00'32'35°E o On W I� N d 7 z FD- 35.76' 'Im A F� C �J I orD S00'00'43"W Y--lqm m rG 229.96' (TIE) ._ I m A < I N - 1713 In MZ- . . — AID " � I I (w w KO O I N I N 0 o I IN I C -_I Im C N P rD I� o > �� INpt z 0I Im _W A 00 I Iw I < o I ID N r° N I I� L, I I oZ 3 o I I + ru u, cn« 0020.00'—Ii---►I o Zrr: Un Un I I ( m n I I M _ I m roq/ )1 I z OC BD-D M �G(t O m D O O z Z ' Zzn nrS CZ Z p O z m p O O II 0� ZD Z 00 A < m D O m 2 n A�iTr.\��O 6 G' OD D Z z m v N z �\\ Fo4', m -C Z m m O D m A z Z c� m<FVy,-- 2 to m ~ O O M 3 O z f��iO ` QQ GA N W,-lmJ Z Z Z Do m � a o 1Z = 2^ Exhibit B i m G m m °O- City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement �mosZ O w myv a wO—On T om � 3 m w m A I-+ 0 A portion of Lots 4-6 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision,situated in the w5 Z a N NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 8,T3N, R1E, B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho 1 i t ' 11 m H m^ °Nmo s84°44'12"e 139,94 154.38 sgz,lq.�2° a s e n84°44'72"w s`'S• �g 41,3 9 �4Y , W Phi a�'S i I 8/19/2025 Scale: 1 inch= 40 feet File: Tract 1:0.1417 Acres(6172 Sq.Feet),Closure:n81.5337e 0.01 ft. (1148281),Perimeter-597 ft. 01 s00.3235w 17.35 10 n00.3235e 35.76 02 s84.4412e 139.94 11 s89.2725e 20 03 s62.1412e 35.6 04 n50.1548e 21.9 05 s43.2539e 52.99 06 s46.3421w 38.7 07 n41.5141w 38.73 08 n62.1412w 41.39 a1 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Tresidio Design Center Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0108) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-060230 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 nolson 09/17/2025 08:31:29 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$25.00 Tresidio Design Center Electronically Recorded Water Main Easement Number: 2 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 16th day of September 2025 between 2973 N Eagle Road, LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities,together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including,but not limited to,buildings,trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences,trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and ofno further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns,heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was ackn ed ed bef me o date by C4 name ot individual), [complete the ollowing Z signing in a representative capa , or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below CANOICEic-JENSState o Signature Notary Public•State of Idaho Commission Number 2018136 My Commission Expires: My Commission Expires Jun 9, 2031 Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 km E N G I N E E R I N G August 25, 2025 Project No. 25-004 City of Meridian Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Water Easement being a portion of Lot 26, Block 1 of Bienville Square Subdivision (Book 102 of Plats, Pages 13495-13498),situated in Government Lot 1 of Section 5,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found 1/2-inch rebar marking the Northwest corner of said Lot 26,which bears N88°47'35"W a distance of 173.71 feet from a found 1/2-inch rebar marking the Northeast corner of said Lot 26,thence following the northerly boundary of said Lot 26,S88°47'35"E a distance of 27.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said northerly boundary,S88°47'35"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence leaving said northerly boundary,502°16'49"W a distance of 27.30 feet; Thence S52°38'21"W a distance of 59.57 feet to the westerly boundary of said Lot 26; Thence following said westerly boundary, N01'12'25"E a distance of 25.58 feet; Thence leaving said westerly boundary, N52°38'21"E a distance of 34.22 feet; Thence NO2°16'49"E a distance of 1752 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 1,386 square feet, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of- way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds, records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \pNNL LAADrE Ns 06 9Tf OF \�P $/25/20Z5 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939 • kmengllp.com POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTHWEST CORNER rIENV 26, BLOCK 1 ILLE SQUARE SUBDIVISION POINT of E. Bourbon Street Private BEGINNING BASIS OF BEARING N88'47'35"W 173.71' 7.08' I 20.00' 126.62' ;1 f S02'16'49"W ;n —� 20 00' —27 3p' NORTHEAST CORNER r L2 LOT 26, BLOCK 1 U ZD� O O cn > / LINE TABLE z� L.- w Ileow u) �� �� 00 LINE BEARING DISTANCE m cv 00 L0 /55`Z L1 NO2'16'49 E 17,52' cv / o L � tLs U Z Parcel D per Record of Survey No. 13619 Warranty Deed per INST. No. 2025-008148 Owner: 2973 N Eagle Road LLC APN: R0945580265 0 M a 0 a O 0 vi ry 0 N N N W Z 4 LEGEND N o O FOUND 1/2" REBAR Y ❑ CALCULATED POINT BOUNDARY LINE 0 N --------EASEMENT LINE N 0 z w IIN < ( 0 30 60 90 0 0 Plan Scale: 1" = 30' E N G I N E E R I N G 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY X ROISE,IDAHOS3713 Exhibit B PHONE(208)639-6939 a kmengllp.com City of Meridian Water Easement w DATE: AUGUST,2025 PROJECT; 25-004 SHEET: A portion of Lot 26, Block 1 of Bienville Square Subdivision, situated in Government Lot 1 1 OF 1 of Section 5, T3N, R1E, B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho s88°47'35"e 20 m w d" N (c r- h f4 r d c (h N o O y �10 4,p�5�rL'�y5 2� S� d N p] N� r Lj °r N 4 C 8/25/2025 Scale: 1 inch= 10 feed IFile. Tract 1:0.0318 Acres(1386 Sq. Feet), Closure: n00.0000e 0.00 fit.(1/41806), Perimeter=184 ft. 01 s88.4735e 20 02 s02.1649w 27.3 03 s52.3821w 59.57 04 n01.1225e 25.58 05 n52.3821e 34.22 06 n02.1649e 17.52 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Pine 43 West Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0110) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-060224 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 cfowler 09/17/2025 08:27:54 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Electronically Recorded Pine 43 West Water Main Easement Number. 1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type See instructionslchecklist for additional information. For Internal use Only ESMT-2025-0110 Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT T THIS Easement Agreement made thisl6th day of_ September 2025 'between DRB investments;LLC (""Grantor'")and the City ofMeridian,;an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"),, WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water grain right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described;and WHEREAS the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the grantor, and other good and valuable consideration,the Grantor-does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities.together with their-maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all tunes. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee. its successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing;, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to,buildings,trash enclosures, carports, sheds. fences, trees, or sleep-rooted shrubs,. THE GRANTOR covenants and agr-ees with the grantee that should any part of the right-o-f way and easement hereby granted shall becorne part of or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easernent Page I Version 0 1/0 1/2024 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: DRB Investments, LLC-Dennis Baker,Manager STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by Dennis Baker (name of individual), [complete the following Ij signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Dl Investments,LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below Jill 44 ww Notary Signature _ . a s $ My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 12-242025 Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 E N G I N E E R I N G km August 19,2025 Project No.25-020 City of Meridian Water Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Water Easement being a portion of Lot 5 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats,Page 665),situated in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 8,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 8,which bears S89.59'17"E a distance of 2,652.59 feet from a found brass cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 8,thence following the northerly line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4,N89"59'17"W a distance of 891.30 feet, Thence leaving said northerly line,SOO.00'43"W a distance of 430.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence S89°41'49"E a distance of 32.00 feet; Thence S00'32'35"W a distance of 11.00 feet to the northerly right-of-way of E.Wilson Street; Thence following said northerly right-of-way,N89.41'49"W a distance of 32.00 feet; Thence leaving said northerly right-of-way, N00.32'35"E a distance of 11.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 352 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. p,L LAN s ��eENSF3 6 r o a a 9pF OF �QP e�<< HY14S i9/2o25 5725 North Discovery way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939 • kmengllp.com P:\25-0ZO\SURVEY\CAD\UHIBITS\25-020CITY Of MERIDIAN WATER EASEMENT 08.18.2025.DWG,KOBE ZIMMERMAN,8119/2025,DWG TO PDF.PC3,08.5X31 L[PDF] r C) I m Z w ^ mO po w� i Zm N O7 J z oW G [y Z Z' To D �+ C fm'3 r C C v I .Zm1 O N O O 3 O O C Z Z w Z DO O 0z j r D DO !n a m m r r Z o 0 � z m cn rwi z r^ m o 0 c cn m w m z a ca N � (; Z C) to mDDT 7 o m Z TO N N INN (' 500'00'43"W _ _ I m DO '2 430.47' (TIE) N 9� D 0) M Z IN Nor- N rD CIRW wl� I� o oIA o 0.I(Ci Alley — Im r) v I o z W � ro o Ln N N o Ln C) DID o w rD Ln N00 w N O_ u TO r w N r d o z I n > To M L o d Wo Z z OOm A CDO GO = n <O O O ' 3 N n zJ m z c"'i n ww zzM n m 0 w m N 9 0 z 0 m Exhibit B oo�� � m NoEZ F City of Meridian Water Easement = mn�m O T a woom c 3 m w a I-1 A portion of Lot 5 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision,situated in the w n z e g NE1/4 of the NV/1/4 of Section 8,T3N, R1E, B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho GI ------------- - i i A s89°41'49'e j 32 it w s n I 32 n89 41'49"w - 1 1 8/19/2025 Scale: 1 inch= 5 feet File: Tract 1:0.0081 Acres(352 Sq.Feet),Closure:nOD.0000e 0.00 ft.(1/999999),Perimeter-86 ft. 01 s89.4149e 32 02 s00.3235w 11 03 n89,4149w 32 04 nOO.3235e 11 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Firenze Plaza McDonalds Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0112) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-060221 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 dryalls 09/17/2025 08:21:25 AM Project Name or Subdivision Name: CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$25.00 Firenze Plaza McDonalds Water Easement Electronically Recorded Water Main Easement Number: 01 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal use Only ESMT-2025-0112 Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Non—Exclusive Easement Agreement made this 16th day of September 20 25 between First Meridian Limited Partnership,a Wyoming limited partnership("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for a non—exclusive easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The non-exclusive easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said non-exclusive easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after malting repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the non-exclusive easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this non-exclusive easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the non-exclusive easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said non-exclusive easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences,trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and non-exclusive easement hereby granted shall become part of,or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 ' public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and non-exclusive easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said non-exclusive easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: First Meridian Limited Partnership, A Wyoming limited partnership By: Western Pacific Holdings,Inc., alifornia corporation, its general partner By: _ Darryl Brow V Pres erty STATE OF IDAHO ) 1 ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by (name of individual), [complete the following l signin in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity) on behalf of First Meridian Limited Partnership (name of entity on behalf of whom record was ecuted), in the following representative capacity: (type authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below bee cigT-e Notary Signature My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 'i CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validity of that document. State of California County of 6QAn44- (1 On SCE 2-4 20'� before me, IuLUS*3 t>• l�=U��J, t T � lC� Date , Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared ��i_ U' ��N� Name of Signer(, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(,whose namej4 is/fie subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(, and that by his/her/their signaturef,.s') on the instrument the person(ps or the entity upon behalf of which the persono acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the *my ALLISON D.KLEIN laws of the State of California that the foregoing Notary Public•California paragraph is true and correct. Contra Costa County Commission N 2417438 WITNESS my h d and official seal. Comm.Expires Oct 19,201b Signatur Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of N tar �b 'c OPTIONAL Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: t Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer- Title(s): ❑ Corporate Officer- Title(s): ❑ Partner- ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Partner- ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing: 02019 National Notary Association Kimley>>>Horn August 14, 2025 Exhibit "A" Project Name:Firenze Plaza McDonald's Water Easement Water Main Easement Number: 01 Located within Lot 1, Block 1 Firenze Plaza Subdivision, on file in Book 124, Pages 19867- 19871 Official Records of Ada County, Idaho, being part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of Section 29, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, from which the South Quarter Corner of said Section 29 bears North 89043'46"West, 2656.17 feet; Thence, along said section line, North 89°43'46"West, 439.88 feet; Thence, leaving said section line, North 0037'49" East, 65.22 feet a 1/2" rebar with cap marked "MSF 13550" marking the Southwest Corner of said Lot 1; Thence North 0°37'49" East, a distance of 137.78 feet to a 1/2" rebar with no cap marking the Northeast Corner of said Lot 1; Thence, along the North line of said Lot 1, North 89024'15"West,29.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence South 00°02'25" East, 15.41 feet; Thence South 89057'35"West, 35.34 feet; Thence North 00°02'25"West, 15.80 feet to the North line of said Lot 1; Thence, along said North line, South 89°24'15" East, 35.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing: 551 Square Feet or 0.01 acre. Q�GEN `L 5071167 70 U� • gVIS BF��� �/� SOUTH 1/16TH CORNER OF SECTION 29,T3N, R1 E,B.M. 28 FOUND 2"ALUMINUM CAP (CP&F NO.2022-009893) 29 NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 50' 0 25' 50' 100, LOT 2,BLOCK 1 FIRENZE PLAZA SUBDIVISION 1" = 50' @8.5X11 POB N89 � °24'15"W L4 29.43' ro JL — — -J L2 a� m EASEMENT AREA: 9 0.01 ACRE E 551 SQ. FT. 2 N (7 O N' LOT1, BLOCK1 o FIRENZE PLAZA SUBDIVISION N 42,700 SQ. FT.OR 0.980 ACRE N O O co z Z' Q m n t W rn 'O w N E U N @ N w I Q0 SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 29,T3N,R1E, B.M. w FOUND 2"ALUMINUM CAP (CP&F NO.2017-120266) Iz POC 0 29 439.88' 29 28 0 Is2 N89°43'46"W 2656.17' m 32 (BASIS OF BEARINGS) 32 33 v ID LEGEND SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 29,T3N,R1 E,B.M. FOUND 3.5"BRASS CAP (CP&F NO.2022-009892) X SECTION LINE w BOUNDARY LINE U — TIE LINE Z LANp — EASEMENT LINE LINE TABLE �Np,L - - - - - ENS GAG FOUND SECTION CORNER NO. BEARING LENGTH FOUND QUARTER CORNER 4 p L1 S00°02'25"E 15.41' 5071167 � ® FOUND 1/16TH CORNER 0 ai 'n 0 O FOUND 1/2"REBAR WITH CAP"MSF 13550" L2 S89°57'35"W 35.34' FOUND 1/2"REBAR(NO CAP) L3 N00°02'25"W 15.80' m A CALCULATED POINT(NOTHING SET) L4 S89°24'15"E 35.35' �I qV�s B� � POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT POB POINT OF BEGINNING 0 U Kimley>>>Horn PROJECT: TITLE: JOB NO.: 093649018 M FIRENZE PLAZA SCALE: 1"=50' 0 1100 W.IDAHO STREET MCDONALD'S WATER EASEMENT EXHIBIT "B" DATE: 2025_08_14 lo BOISE,IDAHDAHO 83702 WATER MAIN EASEMENT NUMBER: 01 SHEET: U� PHONE:(208)297-2885 SHEET 2 OF 2 pp www.kimley-horn.com w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Modified Final Plat (Little Creek MFP-2024-0002) to amend the boundary of the subdivision along Locust Grove Rd. due to the requirement of additional right-of-way by ACHD, by J-U-B Engineers, located at the southeast corner of N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Wilson Ln. STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY N -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .►A H O HEARING 9/16/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council La Fl— FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 sallen(&meridiancity.org Ell SUBJECT: MFP-2024-0002 Little Creek No. 2 LOCATION: Southeast corner of N. Locust Grove Rd. and E. Wilson Ln., in the NW 1/4 of Section 8, T.3N.,R.IE. (Parcel No. R7104253856) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat modification to amend the boundary of the subdivision at the northwest corner of E.Wilson Ln. and N. Locust Grove Rd. and along the west boundary of the subdivision along N. Locust Grove Rd. due to an adjustment of right-of-way(ROW) dedication by Ada County Highway District (ACHD). II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Alex Jones,JUB Engineers—250 S. Beechwood Ave., Ste. 201,Boise,ID 83709 B. Owner: Erik Pilegaard,Little Creek Partners,LLC—2452 Bayview Ave., Carmel, CA 93923 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS The final plat(H-2019-0103) for Little Creek Subdivision No. 2 was approved by City Council on 11/6/2019 and signed by the City Engineer on 7/23/2021;however,the final plat was never recorded. Because the City Engineer's signature was obtained within the required timeframe to do so,the final plat is still valid and has not expired. The Applicant's narrative states the delay in getting the plat recorded is due to numerous corrections being required from the Ada County Surveyor that went through several rounds of revisions and Page 1 resubmittals to the County. During the County Surveyor's final review of the plat,it was discovered that ROW had been dedicated to ACHD along Locust Grove Rd. on 1/10/2023 and that the boundary of the plat had changed. For this reason, a modification to the final plat is required to be approved by City Council and new signatures are needed on the plat before it can be recorded. The number of building lots and common lots have not changed, only the boundary has been adjusted. Staff has reviewed the proposed revised final plat and deems it in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat as required by UDC11-6B-3C.2. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed revised final plat per the conditions in Exhibit VI. Page 2 V. EXHIBITS A. Approved Preliminary Plat(dated: 8/17/2016) s'"t- -I:IL ITE L- F-:: LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION =-• c � MATOIN THE NORnf*sro1uwrEROFSEUDIN9. jr' �IK TOWNSHP3 WMRTK RANGE I FAST.8015E 1BiIRIAN `�— CITYOFMERIDIAN,ADACOUNTY, IDAHO- -' Ifs ..� 2017 —71 � , '; r *r .-� tr .��■ -, v _`;.w :���lJ ��,�JXr. .` '..I+ � ., .n� �� ..a. �l [ to EI In i tILLUJI Ell '14 n°rNIlti 1 �- + ''G- •_.. - - / . -oura� Vb»iR s.eiE] � •-� •� y � n -u.-' � p.�l -Ha.a+r.pwo o.rva.Af Y! �w• [.tea o - - ,I , Page 3 B. Previously Approved Final Plat(H-2019-0103)—dated: 10/10/2019 PLAT SHOWING PLAT BOOK PAGE �111194eaa4 Little Creek Subdivision No. 2 I A Mia of loll 13&19 d Plemmt Yollep Wikim,SNOted i the kftsl Wel 01 sh„1 s Scour k Towship 3 North,Rage I lost,Boise Neridioo, r➢`-- I City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho. 2019 s gel 3 I Key Map r=aan i I m ri - '� ggiT59'19'E Leaend - =caao'41b ]nn7 _ _—_—__o _ _ - .R—_—E.mxon lane_`_ -snwlx.ewn�v un. N - - .?---r--'r-'- -- - °L10 Bleck 1 e I i -µel M1w,y une 44 i3 42 41 40 39 38 $ ! I I I —--— •—_ S1B12'E6'E �74,01, I P 1,t Seale F,F- a 45 48 45w00'41'W'36 I In- I�'^ Cnmme lM , 16 + -ade rnw.ream ae.. v 5 � - i1iu.'. 36 S56'38'16 $ $ lerc Cammen iat 131 1 -.�_ v II so „�51' �ii 1s L, 'n�a�''a9 ." x� .I 50 LB __ !I o, l bob..] n, en.x d,b . t ! 51 SB �.l 1 ro e.nNn e.lenace/a�'�•d-u-e lewT ,t,� 4B u S I ,d,a sxt�/e�' �,,�n.— „ 'tea 52 JsrB 5 57 L-.A_ Flec 1 Ii❑ .72 W ear e..R.ge�f II$ wga,ce k i $4 s',t,' m.u3 V rwiar Irnwa) if 10�'IO Well 5fl9-33'39'E 51�a9'J { Fix°wvn 1-Il-B ENGINEERS,INC. a IPiF IV7F°A775 I4 xh'fx x�Ec[ �eo[xcr•Pf11WxL eatlm,a0 emvc.Sude N1.ldx:,�xe3ea9 ts�,l NOT FORuxREGOftbATION a wren un9ass..,wdw.�,x xyl.a x,.,o-,e-0,e SHEET 1 QF 6 Page 4 C. Proposed Revised Final Plat 1. CL z z z t -A-2- 1 54 i f A c 0 Z (D z C �71 CA C-) i oN uoisi,pInS I—C�114.,j z Jj baF 9z gy 4-) I C)q EI SO'Z6Z 61 3 1 T1,0H P-N Page 5 _ 'oN uoielnlpgnS'Iaa.10 elilll li I I 00 IF V 2 n Im oEa £I .OS'.L ml g wso � n L-----.,OS SII_---- —L— n h 5 I yyh bh. E M F ? nhN !A Eo _ E CQy Xw V - � 3 /JJ 3,LT,00.00N Y\ yJ(l 6 z O b � w .29'96 wi� I .Z9'6C Q m ry 3„L4,00.00N W W .199e MS 4Z lANI+ - Q M E BSI o� � I m Fr h l MFI.LIAON b I - 91.56 3"£L,ZL.005 nP :o o n .tCa o 3„bb,00A0N Sa-Oa a I ae m <I �I s - 4N ,6a'S6 I J �e SLOB NIF L.L I.i]ON it FZy �I 3.,Lb:70.0ON 1/ _ ,99'lL N n O P ml 000E, r � _ o _ h \{ sosa -O> M„£SL,Z`.DDN L ,SOZ6Z M„f l,Z LOON poaa anai�Isn Nod N _ - - ---- Page 6 1 ON u GA'pgn5 1pao Ojill II � // y,�o(�OA ayO r✓N � W LJ = C- 5 .10 6 �9t /' rD 6 � � �h ® k rs; c^�n ^A' m m ry. n c41 . r� LL 41 w � ro � r so 0 r � a0�a°sec 0 y n _ xrs f �3 � ne l004$ C�S Page 7 R�SYOR w os� 5 •� 0 •r-I I - 01 V1 -_ - E 3 � � ➢ � � — _ rs v � _ �� 3� ��Y A7. ° E c £ - £ ;Y Z - pmN�. add ❑ Z _ (n3a o m3amrii?zdi � ,���pw Page 8 D. Right-of-Way Acquisition Exhibit EXH I BIT A ACHD RIGHT-OF-WAY FEE Ai7UISITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision according to the plat thereof filed in Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, Ada County Records,situate in the Northwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East,;Boise Meridian, City cf Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest corner of Section S, from which the west quarter corner of Section 8 hears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet;thence along the west line of Section S, South 00'26'22" West, 485.01 feet;thence departing from said west line, South 89"59'28" East, 25.00 feet to the northwest corner of Parcel 35 as described in that Warranty Deed to ACHD as Grantee recorded under Instrument No_ 106034376,Ada County Records;thence along the north line of said Parcel 35,South 89`59'28"East,36.36 feet to the northeast corner thereof; thence along the east fine of Parcel 35,South 43"09'59"West, 0.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,; Thence d epa rting from said east line, South 00°12'13" East,315.39 fe-et; Thence south 00a26'13"West, 55.33 feet to the southwesterly Iine of said Lot 18; Thence along said southwesterly line, North 55'36'16"West, 13.27 feet to the southeast corner of said Parcel 35; Thence along the east line of Parcel 35, North 00°26'22" East, 57.80 feet; Thence continuing along said east line, North 00'12'0$"West, 303.74 feet; Thence continuing along said east line, Nort#i 43"09'59"fast, 16.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 4,084 square feet or 0.094 acres, more or less. END DESCRIPTION Ro4Kazar6o—ff, P 6 q o I III Z. q/6 � Page 1 of 1 Page 9 wa W�w A � a sp C7 a F P� K Ap41 Zoe N � m NNM r v u7 N v m o c o 9/1512022 Scale: 1 inch= 50 feet Fife.ACHD Right-of-Way Fee Aquisition.ndp Tract 1:6.U938 Acres{4084 Sq.Feet),Closure:n00.0000e 0.00 h.(11204567).Perfmeaer=772 h. 01 s00.1213e 315.39 02 sOD.2613w 65.33 03 rG55.3616w 13.27 04 n00.2622e 57.8 05 nOD_1208w303.74 06 n43.0959e 16M Page 10 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(H-2016-0076,DA Inst.No. 2016-109494;A-2018-0013; and H-2019- 0103). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the modified final plat. Page 11 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Pollard North (FP-2025-0019) by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/4 mile west of N. Black Cat Rd. and north of W. Chinden Blvd. STAFF REPORT C� W IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O DATE: 9/16/2025 Legend TO: City Council Iff Project Lucaiion FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 - �' LIT sallen@meridiancity.org SUBJECT: FP-2025-0019; A-2025-0113; A-2025- M1 0123 R;15 Pollard North No. 1 RUT UT PROPERTY LOCATION: Generally located 1/4 mile west of N. R--8 W8 Black Cat Rd. and north of W. Chinden R. W. Blvd.,in the South 1/2 of Section 21, R R-8 R-8 .�.T.4N.,R.I W. R- R,i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 62 buildable lots and 17 common/other lots on 9.31 acres of land in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts for the first phase of Pollard North Subdivision. Alternative Compliance is requested from the Director to UDC 11-3A-7A.7,which requires the developer to construct fences abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas; and to UDC 11-313-12C,which requires a minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strip to be provided along each side of all pathways. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Eli Benski,Brighton Corporation—2929 W. Navigator Dr., Ste. 400, Meridian,ID 83642 B. Owner: Michael Hall, SCS Investments,LLC—3240 W. Bavaria St.,Eagle, ID 83616 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat(H- 2024-0037) as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The proposed final plat depicts the same number of building lots and common area as shown on the approved preliminary plat and complies with the phasing plan. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary as required by UDC 11-6B-3C. Page 1 Alternative Compliance is requested from the Director to UDC 11-3A-7A.7,which requires the developer to construct fences abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas.No fencing is proposed on the shared property line between the building lots on Lots 25-30,Block 2 and the common area on Lot 24,Block 2; fencing is proposed in all other locations but terminates 20 feet from the edge of right-of-way/front property lines along side yard property lines,rather than dropping in height and continuing the length of the lot as required. The Applicant has omitted the short segment of fencing along side yards in front yard areas because they feel it separates residents from their neighbors and gathering areas; and along the rear of building lots adjacent to the common area on Lot 24,Block 2 because it provides functional connection between private residences, common areas and roadways. Landscaped planter beds are proposed along side yard property lines in front yard areas and a pathway is proposed along the shared property line between the building lots on Lots 25-30, Block 2 and the common area on Lot 24,Block 2 to delineate private from common open space. Staff finds the proposed alternative means of compliance includes innovative design features based on"new urbanism"and meets the findings for such in UDC 11-513-5E, as noted below in Section V.A. Alternative Compliance is also requested to UDC 11-313-12C,which requires a minimum 5-foot- wide landscape strip to be provided along each side of all pathways,for the pathway along the northern boundary of Lot 24,Block 2. In this location,the pathway abuts the southern property line of adjacent building lots(i.e. Lots 25-30,Block 2)and a landscape strip is not proposed. The Applicant proposes a landscape strip on adjacent building lots instead of the common area as they feel the pathway creates a clear delineation between the private lots and common area. Landscaped planter beds are provided along adjacent streets on this common lot and additional trees are proposed for shade,while still allowing a large open space for people to gather or recreate in. Staff finds the proposed alternative means of compliance includes innovate design features based on"new urbanism",which promote connectivity and walkability and meets the findings for such in UDC I I-5B-5E, as noted below in Section V.B. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval below in Section VI. The Director approved both requests for alternative compliance per the Findings below in Section V. V. FINDINGS In order to grant approval for an alternative compliance application,the decision-making body shall determine the following: A. Alternative Compliance(ALT-2025-0113): I. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or The Director finds strict adherence or application of the requirements is feasible. 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and The Director finds the proposed alternative compliance of providing landscape strips along side yard property lines in front yards and pedestrian walks, as applicable,provides an equal means for meeting the requirement. Page 2 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. The Director finds the proposed alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. B. Alternative Compliance(ALT-2025-0123): 1. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or The Director finds strict adherence or application of the requirements is feasible. 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and The Director finds the proposed alternative compliance of providing landscaped planter beds on abutting building lots adjacent to the pathway and along adjacent streets in the common area provides an equal means of meeting requirement. 4. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. The Director finds the proposed alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. VI. EXHIBITS Page 3 A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 2/28/2025) PRELIMINARY PLAT SHOWING VICIN"MAP:V=Z " POLLARD NORTH SUBDIVISION A PAR[ELOF LAND SITUATED IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/40F SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,B.M.,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO o.�,r s 3 - "coo0 OOOGo GJJ, O O 3 �0000©000 ��00©00000>>;.i ® s ',6��w ,a�,�e„ l,- =s� r � � :>�. � •, O O O �a�®�p©®®® 4� ®�®®®DO©®: o ,• MERM PREUMINMV PLAT DATA I I P11'I I f IEGFN. INDf%OF pRAWINGS POLLARD NORTH SUBDIVISION e„,`, w,°x eEaxx. ,,, MERIDIAN,ID i uur urpnevxN .or°W1f .®� [AVER-ET krn SURVEY CONTROL NOTES �� — Gh„ !..n.,"nEa..,"m mv�vx�...a.o°°o�..�xn..°o. wua xwxw.er rw wioxwe ur„u u io,H PP1.0 Page 4 B. Final Plat(dated: 6/11/25) S � _9 U z^„ 0 5 � g 9 Falrbmme5uhdIvkM-Na.3 E g a M $ a,�m s<5 I � � m €a ogk �� antl>ieOPalsoai'N , ='W �$�� n 5°pa E $ Oyu N L2 o Z� r �se�� a � mrrrt � 5 •O N f o"�aqg8} �O ® � I l � F���G� j :i 7 7 71 -2 5 n 5 !1 • x� o oO O III o WI 56 nl = = a O O $ 'eelNp 29 �o O O 'any aapla�r,uarnyaSN v Y I a o Y g O O O a s jIN s " o o o = § § � � zn J on ,ss cel a.sr.ss.00u goo § a o go €o gzu $g ea oo 20 s$ _ 0 g 'antl!na'I'N g p o„ og e z G T G G ti Page 5 C. Landscape Plan(dated: August 2025) ..a�� 5 ax KAM NNId 3dVDSONVI �� o OI'NVIOla3W sgolzlnza I'ON NOISIAlCgns HDM Obtl1IOd Ali, tl eke g� a9 99 °s'€�° r.e��'•,_ a "o s� -° RAW€d _V U ARM .i OloI U, 3 9 3 3 O I I Q s �6 66 � o0 0l ©II I � I yy y gg �y) Ili h 9 ib M € 6 a S9S�+S R 0 a LL 10 z > o ti4 Y k L�II.ni��G 5 m �5�5 e 0 O 2ea2 � s ��ga s� z d a II�8 ee C r Page 6 D. Amenity Exhibit O ® ® m Y. �a� r � �ur•a 0i 1 �VpCA14�44 o-' � p vv�V1p'Vw v n � � � 1�►�� .. � ��IJeI o .�. BLOCK 2 AREA DOG WASTE STATION OLLECTOR BUFFER EXCLUDES PARK STRIP GRASS COVERAGE Page 7 E. Common Driveway Exhibit T HX3)DOIG 3A 91 4T V4VqSIOIZ Pfaff g� 1191HX3 3ARlO NOWWO] w T'ON NOISIAmanS HIHON Otl"Od y �fhffn affp�` Qp�w2 0 0 m¢z�x m o 0 1N3W3SY3 2131tlM oz T Tom; u > 7 7 r 8'PI "PI "PI "PI MIS - I I I �II of �I - ii-z 2 O I,o w I I > zw lip 0 --- lU I O .Z( 301S e --- � I w � ;, f • � a —� O a � O 4 '3Atl�7003150N3'N � co N I in 3015 - ------� Ln-�w ,-----= � � N I {�I x�P� �/ I � I I I o i 0 . s 3 Page 8 - r - ��r�rr�r�i�•�rirr�r��:.� s _ „ m Page 9 VII.CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: I. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [annexation/preliminary plat(H-2024-0037),Development Agreement Inst. #2025-029554]. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat within two (2)years of the preliminary plat approval(i.e. by April 22,2027); or apply for a time extension, in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by KM Engineering, stamped on 6/11/25 by Aaron L. Ballard, included in Exhibit B shall be revised as follows: a. Plat note#4: Include the recorded instrument number of the development agreement (i.e.#2025-029554). b. Plat note#16: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD public right-of- way easement(sidewalk). c. Plat note#18: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD landscape license agreement. d. Include the CP&F No. at the northwest corner on Sheet 1. e. Include the recorded instrument number of the Meridian sewer easement graphically depicted on Sheet 2. £ Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD storm easement graphically depicted on Sheet 2. g. Include the recorded instrument number of the Veolia easement graphically depicted on Sheet 2. 5. The landscape plan prepared by KM Engineering, dated August 2025 included in Exhibit C, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict landscaping to total 20 feet measured from back of curb within the street buffer on the south side of W. Waverton Dr. There is a 2-foot wide area along the south side of the sidewalk that does not depict vegetative groundcover. b. The street buffer along W.Waverton Dr. shall be revised to comply with the enhanced buffer requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.3 because it was counted toward open space requirements. 6. The common driveway on Lot 16,Block 1 shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D and the setback exhibit above in Section VII.E. 7. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any building permit applications for development as set forth in the development agreement. 8. Administrative design review shall be required for all single-family attached structures in accord with the residential design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. Single- family detached structures are exempt from these standards. Page 10 9. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Public Works https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=412499&dbid=0&repo=Meridi a! i C. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=412543&dbid=0&repo=Meridi anCi Page 11 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Ten Mile Flex (H-2025-0027) by Jeff Hatch, located at 4255 N. Ten Mile Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAWC��(IEFI AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 5.55 acres of land for the construction of approximately 15,900 square feet of multi-tenant industrial and 70,250 square feet of self-service storage(storage condos)in the I-L zoning district,by Jeff Hatch. Case No(s). H-2025-0027 For the City Council Hearing Date of: September 9',2025 (Findings on September 16t'', 2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 9t'', 2025, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 9t'',2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 9t'', 2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 16t', 2025, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 16t'',2025, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of September 9t'',2025, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 613-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -2- agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of September 16',2025. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 16th day of September,2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) By Luke Cavener, Council President 9-16-2025 Attest: Chris Johnson 9-16-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 9-16-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -4- Exhibit A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN;,�-,-- DEPARTMENT REPORT I D A H O HEARING 9/9/2025 ,u; Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council Area of Impact �= City Limits ram . FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 S7 nnapoli@meridiancity.org _ APPLICANT: Jeff Hatch - SUBJECT: H-2025-0027 Ten Mile Flex _ LOCATION: Located at 4255 N. Ten Mile Road in the ==T f southeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 34,TAN.,R.1 W. 70, - I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 5.55 acres of land for the construction of approximately 15,900 square feet of multi-tenant industrial and 70,250 square feet of self-service storage(storage condos)in the I-L zoning district. B. Issues/Waivers The applicant requests a City Council waiver to reduce the 25-foot landscape buffers to 10 feet to the south and west and 15 feet to the north. The property is surrounded by existing residential in Ada County. C. Recommendation Staff: Approval Commission: Approval as presented in the staff report. D. Decision Council: Approved as presented in the staff report. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -5- I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial - Existing Zoning RUT in Ada County VILA.2 Proposed Zoning Light Industrial(I-L) Adopted FLUM Designation Mixed Use Non-Residential VILA.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 3/11/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 4/10/2025 Site posting date 8/26/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.0 • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Doc Lane(Private Street)via N.Ten Mile Road(Arterial - Road) • Traffic Level of Service N.Ten Mile Road:Better than"E" - ITD Comments Received Yes:No Comment Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Meridian Public Works Water • Distance to Mainline Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns None Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions for comments received or see the public record. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -6- Figure 1: Service Impact Summary ImpactService . . Ready a Caution ,e �a�� FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -7- III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject property is designated as Mixed Use Non-Residential on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed zoning of Light Industrial(I-L)is consistent with the FLUM. The applicant is proposing to construct approximately 15,900 square feet of flex space and 70,250 square feet of self-service storage(storage condos). These uses are listed as allowed in the I-L zoning in the UDC and Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the MU-NR designation is to designate areas where new residential dwellings will not be permitted, as residential uses are not compatible with the planned and/or existing uses in these areas. For example,MU-NR areas are used near the City's Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility and where there are heavy industrial or other hazardous operations that need to be buffered from residential. The subject site is surrounded by Ada County residential properties zoned RUT. However,the broader area is primarily designated as Mixed-Use Non-Residential and Low-Density Residential on FLUM. Industrial spaces and self-storage facilities are a desired use specified in the Mixed- Use Non-Residential designation, as noted above. The multi-tenant industrial spaces provide employment opportunities and valuable spaces for small-scale industrial businesses. Each user will be evaluated at the time of applying for certificate of occupancy. The self-service storage on the rear of the property is proposed to be constructed with phase one (1)of the development. The multi-tenant industrial buildings fronting on Ten Mile Road will be included in phase two(2) of the development. The self-service storage(storage condos) are a heightened use for storage, as they will be bought individually for luxury storage. The applicant intends to condo these units once they have begun construction. The applicant will be required to short plat the property to condo the units once the building permits have been submitted. The multi-tenant industrial building will be allowed to develop with all the uses listed in UDC 11- 2C-2,with the further restriction of Storage Facility, Self-Service and Storage, Outdoor. The intent of restricting these uses further is to promote employment uses in these tenant spaces. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed use should be an appropriate use in the MU-NR FLUM designation for the reasons noted above. • Slow the outward progression of the City's limits by discouraging fringe area development; encourage development of vacant or underutilized parcels currently within City limits. (4.05.03B) The subject property is eligible for annexation and has city limits on one (1) of its four sides. Currently, this property is used residentially, and by redeveloping it will provide opportunities for properties to the west to develop. • Ensure that regulations and plans support and encourage desired development and land use patterns within the Area of City Impact. (3.01.01 C)Based on feedback from stakeholders, the desired land use for this area is primarily industrial, as Meridian has very little vacancy and is a desirable location for industrial users. • "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity." (6.01.02B) The Director recommends a cross-access/ingress-egress easement is granted to the property to the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -8- north for future access via Ten Mile Rd. through the subject property to reduce access points on the arterial street(i.e. Ten Mile Rd.). • Pursue economic development opportunities with technology,healthcare, environmentally- friendly manufacturing, light industrial, and professional service industries. (2.08.02) The development incorporates a multi-tenant industrial building that will allow for smaller businesses to find a place to operate in Meridian. Table 4: Project Overview Description Details History N/A Physical Features Piped irrigation ditch next to the five-foot multi-use pathway Acreage 5.089 Acres B. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The site currently contains four(4)residential and accessory structures. Prior to the issuance of the building permit,these structures shall be removed. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant has indicated the proposed uses for the site intends to be industrial multi-tenant buildings along the Ten Mile Road frontage and self-storage buildings(storage condos)in the rear of the property. The use of industrial buildings and self-storage facilities(storage condos) aligns with the Mixed-Use Non-Residential(MUNR) future land use designation, which accommodates a range of commercial and industrial users. This project not only provides employment and industrial options within city limits but also advances the city's economic goals and meets the needs of its residents. Specifically,it complies with Policy 3.07.01D,which promotes the preservation of industrial land by discouraging non-industrial uses and emphasizing light manufacturing, distribution, flex-space, and base employment. Additionally, it aligns with Policy 3.03.01E,which encourages infill development within the city. The property's location adjacent to N. Ten Mile Road enhances its accessibility and supports the local industrial landscape, addressing the demand for such developments in both the immediate area and the wider community. Furthermore, industrial buildings and self- storage facilities are permitted in the I-L zoning district,which supports the applicant's proposal. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards of the I-L zoning district in UDC Table 11-313-3.Based on the concept plan and elevations, the applicant is meeting the 35 foot building setback, and 50 foot height limit. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): UDC 11-4-3-34: Storage Facility, Self-Service a. Storage units and/or areas shall not be used as dwellings or as a commercial or industrial place of business. The manufacture or sale of any item by a tenant from or at a self-service storage facility is specifically prohibited. The applicant is proposing the storage facilitylbuilding to be for storage condos which will be for personal storage use and not for business purposes. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -9- b. On site auctions of unclaimed items by the storage facility owners shall be allowed as a temporary use in accord with Chapter 3,Article E, "temporary use requirements", of this Title. The applicant will comply with this if and when this happens at the facility. c. The distance between structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five(25)feet. The applicant meets this standard. d. The storage facility shall be completely fenced,walled,or enclosed and screened from public view. Where abutting a residential district or public road,chainlink shall not be allowed as fencing material. The storage building will have enhanced architecture, and the roll-up doors will screened from public view. This is not a typical storage building as it will be used for storage condos, which is a more specialized and heightened use. The applicant is also proposing fencing that willfully enclose the storage facility. However, the fencing shall be closed vision. e. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m.to 11:00 p.m. The applicant will conform with this standard. f.A minimum twenty-five-foot wide landscape buffer shall be provided where the facility abuts a residential use,unless a greater buffer width is otherwise required by this title. Landscaping shall be provided as set forth in subsection 11-3B-9.0 of this Title. The applicant is requesting a council waiver to the 25 foot landscape buffer to reduce it to 10 feet for the adjacent residential properties to the west and south and 15 feet to the north. The applicant has received letters of support from the neighboring property owners to the west and south in support of this waiver. g. If the use is unattended,the standards in accord with Section 11-3A-16, "self-service uses", of this Title shall also apply. The applicant will comply with these standards. h. The facility shall have a second means of access for emergency purposes as determined by the Fire Marshal. The fire department has reviewed the concept plan and has deemed the site to have adequate access. i. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance. Materials shall not be stored within the required yards. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The applicant is not proposing outdoor storage on the site. j. The site shall not be used as a"vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein deemed. The applicant will comply with this standard. k. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand(1,000)feet from a hospital. Not applicable. C. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Based on the concept plan,the applicant appears to comply with the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-19. The applicant has positioned no more than 50%of the total off-street parking FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 10- between building facades and abutting streets. Additionally,the building on the eastern portion of the site exceeds the 30%building frontage requirement. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Ten Mile Road, an arterial street. This buffer shall be landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. The concept plan shows a 35 foot setback from Ten Mile Road with the landscape buffer inside of this meeting this requirement. However, the existing landscaping between the sidewalk and Ten Mile Road will be required to be brought into compliance and landscaped per UDC 11-3B-7C. The landscaping will be evaluated with the certificate ofzoning compliance and shall be landscaped per UDC 11-3B-5-2B-0. ii. Parking lot landscaping Landscaping is required to be provided along all parking areas per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-8. The proposed concept plan does not meet the minimum requirements. The western parking landscape shall be widened to 7 feet and the parking stall shall be reduced to 17 feet. The landscaping will be evaluated with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses A 25-foot wide buffer is required to the residential land use to the north as set forth in UDC Table 11-2C-3 and 11-4-3-34F, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 9C. The Applicant requests City Council approval of a reduced buffer width from 25-to 10-feet adjacent to the residential use to the west and south and to 15-feet adjacent to the residential use to the north as allowed by UDC 11-3B-9C.2.A reduction to the buffer width shall not affect building setbacks.A letter was submitted from the abutting property owner to the west and south, agreeing to the proposed reduced buffer. A letter was not provided from the property to the north. iv. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10,the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two(2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the final plat detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. v. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along N. Ten Mile Road. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 11 - 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6 requires one space for every two thousand(2,000) sq. ft. of gross floor area in industrial districts. However, staff asked the applicant to provide commercial parking standards for the flex space fronting on Ten Mile Road which require one space for every five hundred(500) sq. ft. of gross floor area. In addition, self service storage facilities only require parking based on the size of the leasing building which was included in the 15,900 square feet. The applicant is proposing 47 parking spaces on the concept plan which exceeds the 32 spaces that are required with the buildings (15,900 square feet). Additionally, the applicant anticipates potential commercial users will use portions of the site in the future which is why the parking is in excess. The uses will be analyzed as they are proposed within the tenant spaces. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C.Bicycle parking is not depicted and the plans shall be revised to incorporate the location of the bicycle parking with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance submittal that meet these requirements. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Goals 5.01.02C and 2.09.03A of the comprehensive plan promote area beautification and community identity through heightened design standards providing distinct and engaging identities. The Architectural Standards Manual requires modulation in the surface plane at no less than 50 ft. intervals. There should be at least 2 pedestrian-scale architectural features,and physical distinctions to anchor the building. There should be at least two different field materials,with at least one accent material. In response,the developer is proposing a multi-tenant industrial building fronting Ten Mile Road with a mix of metal siding. This shall be revised with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance to provide an additional two(2)field materials to comply with the ASM. Additionally,the developer is proposing four(4) storage buildings with the primary material consisting of metal as well. Since these storage buildings are visible from an existing residence,the applicant shall revise the end caps of the storage building to incorporate design elements that comply with the ASM. The proposed elevations do not meet the architectural manual. However,the applicant shall submit the architectural standards manual checklist with the design review application to ensure compliance with these standards. Staff and the applicant will work together on the elevation during this submittal. 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The submitted concept plan shows fencing on the Northwest portion of the site but does not provide details. The applicant shall include fencing details with the submittal of the certificate ofzoning compliance. The fencing is required to be closed vision fencing as it is abutting residential. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 12- D. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Goal 6.01.02B emphasizes reducing the number of access points onto arterial streets by utilizing strategies such as cross-access agreements, access management, and the creation of frontage and backage roads,while also improving connectivity between local and collector streets. Access is proposed off N. Ten Mile Road(an arterial street)through a single curb cut. The applicant has condensed the two(2) access points to N. Ten Mile into a single access point on the north portion of the property. Doc Lane,the existing and proposed access point, is a 30- foot access easement that runs along the northern portion of the property and provides access to the property to the west(Parcel#S0434142020). The applicant is proposing to improve Doc Lane as the primary access. However, cross access is required to the property from the north and south,which will function as a backage road parallel to N. Ten Mile Road that will align with W. Belltower Drive in the future. At which time,the Doc Lane access will either be closed or restricted,as determined by ACHD. Staff finds the proposed entrance to be in compliance with the UDC and the comprehensive plan. Additionally,the applicant shall record cross-access ingress/egress easements with the properties to the north and south prior to approval of the certificate of zoning compliance application. 2. Multiuse Pathways,Pathways, and Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-5, Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-81 11- 3A-17): The site has an existing detached 5-foot sidewalk along N. Ten Mile Road,which has been determined to be sufficient by the city parks department. Typically, 10-foot detached multi- use pathways are required along arterial and collector roads. However,the 5-foot detached sidewalk was recently constructed, and the parks department deemed it acceptable at this time. Additionally,the curb cut that is being removed shall be replaced with curb,gutter, sidewalks, and landscaping with the first certificate of zoning compliance application. The applicant has provided a pedestrian connection to the multi-tenant industrial building fronting Ten Mile Road and along the south side of Doc Lane. This is an adequate pedestrian connection,but where the pedestrian connection crosses through vehicular driving surfaces, it is required to be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth in UDC 11-3A-19B.4. This shall be revised with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance application. 3. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): Doc Lane is currently a private street in Ada County and is used as the main access point for the property to the west(Parcel#S0434142020) of the subject property. The applicant shall provide proof of the approved private street from Ada County or apply for a private street application with the city. This will be required prior to issuance of the certificate of zoning compliance application. E. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): There is an existing irrigation ditch that was piped on the back of sidewalk. The applicant shall maintain the irrigation pipe and coordinate with the irrigation district for any changes to the irrigation network. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 13- 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat or certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. c. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application(s) shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for this site. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 14- d. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,the applicant shall construct driveway stubs to the north and south property lines and record a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granting accesses to the north(Parcel#SO434417201)and south(Parcel#SO434417605) properties in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Ten Mile Road. Copies of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. e. All existing structures shall be removed from the property prior to issuance of the first building permit. f. The applicant shall consolidate all the access points into a single access point as shown on the concept plan. At the submittal of the first certificate of zoning compliance,the access point being removed shall be replaced with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping in compliance with the UDC. g. The multi-tenant industrial building will be allowed to develop with all the uses listed in UDC 11-2C-2,with the further restriction of Storage Facility, Self-Service and Storage Facility,Outdoor. h. Provide proof of Doc Lane being an approved private street from the county or apply for a private street application with the city prior to issuance of the certificate of zoning compliance. i. Comply with the specific use standards for a Self Service Storage Facility and for all prospective uses going into the multi-tenant industrial building in UDC 11-4-3 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 15- B. Meridian Public Works Wastewater + Distance to Sewer Available at Site Serwices + Sewer Shed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's WRRF declining Balance • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Faeiliityr Plan • IrnparLgci3ncems See Public WflrksSite Specific Conditions Water + 'Distance to Water Water Available M Site Services • PressureZone • (Estimated Project See application Water E RU's • WaterQualityr Mane • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • Impads/Corioerns M - NON-PLAT CONDITIONS Piiia tu Womv-s DkrAdrrmE n, Site Specitre Cundiliuns of Appruvid 1. lkrinp a 9'Water main fnrcn'l'cn M ile Rand to the Westurn}un}xziy_]lie %vi I I need a 20' Imsement for this_ 2. Instal l R"Main to Suuthcsn boundary,A 20' Na rrnLwt it nquired with the main Centered. 3. A Fcncc is Akawcd to c7tvis perpcndiculsr t,u the C:ity's casma M,however it must not have any posts in tiro ca-%micnls and any panels crossing the easement must by removable without having to mmove other panch,A gale is alloyed to cxm-g a City Utilitycascment,howcwcr it must be wide enough to allow the Uty to have access to the full width ofthe[sE x ent_F!o pouts arc aJ kawcd in the eaAcment_City must have ability to open the gate at all timC�q_It wiJ I be required to provido a memo siating haw the Lity is to have access cm dre utility plan. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) - 16- 4_ Any wells that m iJJ not continue tso he used must he properly abandoned according to Jdaho Well t nnstruclion Stemdanb Ruins administered by 16e Idaho I)gMrtment of Water Resources (LI)W R)_The Llicvel>tacr,Owner,or prajcct Engjnecr,shall provide a statement addreming w hcther there are any existing;wells in the development,and i f so,how Lfi y will continue to be used,or provide r000rd of their albandonmcnt_I Cwclls are to be ahamdoned,the project owner or theirrcprcmcntsbve must contact the ILIWR Groundwater Protection Section(Aaron Skinner, l lydragenlogist 2W-7 ii74972)Bk FOKE'amy work is done to decommission an existing well (even it it is believed that the well in less than 1 H ft deep)_Proof of communication with EL1 W R mavt be submitled In the L*prior to any wank being done tto decarmmission the well.Failum to camnwnicatc with I1DWR may result m additional wnrk and expense tar ciecom-rrumian the well. 5_ Ensure no sewer services pates lbrokWh initltratkm trench 6. Provide 2tr Easements&F mains,hydrant Jaterals and water services. Esascments shouJdeatcnd up to the end a mwinlhydrantlwatcr motor and I tv beyond it_ 5. No rermarwilt structures Qrees,bushed buildings,ca"rls,trash receptacle walls,fetwes, inTilLrrtiDEt tr:nCheb,light poled etc_}to be built within the utility easvnont_ grkmvral C'ondi4onz Df Approval 1. ApphUflt shall oaardinatc water and sewer main sine and routing with the Public Works Di,-partmmt. 2. F`cr Meridrwn City Code(MCQC the applicant Khali he responsible to install sewer and water mains uo and through this developmcrmt_ Applicant may be clioble fora reimhumorrent agreement for infrastEuclum enhamecmenr per MU('H-6-5_ 3. The wpplicant shall provide earement(s)for all public watedsewer mains outside of public right of way(include all vrarcrscrvicevs and hydmants)_ Sewerlwatcr casement vanes depending on server depth.Sewer 0-20 ft docp require a 30 R easement*24-25 Lti 2L44 R easement,and 25-30 ft a45 R casement. RTm=no permanent structures{trees,bushes,buildings,cahl►orls,trash roccp(acle walLs,fencer,infiltration trenches,Jiy ht poles,ctc_)are built within the utility easement. Submit an execulM emcnment(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho E_iccmed Pmfcasional Land%urveyor,which must include the area of the easement (r wriEtxl I;XI 11 lif L'A)and an S l l2"x 1 I"nu p with bracing r and didamcrs(ntwkr l I i7C111131'1'1#] far review_Both exhibits must be sealed,signed and dated by a Profs ional Land Surveyor_IX) N{F1'Rk C'0RL1_ 4. The C4 of Meridiem requires that presiurizcd irrigation syslenvs he supplied by a year-round source rrfwaler{tJ DC 1 1-3134}.Tbc applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary sourer_ If a surface or well solace is not avai lab le,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be:roquirud.if a single-point connection is uti lard, the developer will be respnnsi ble for the payment of agscswmenLs far the common areas prkw to prior 1A5 receiving dcvelopment plan approval_ 5. Any stnutures that are alYowcd in retrain shall be subject to evaluation and Fxx9siblcreassiguEncm ofstrect addruw g to he in compl Lance with MCC_ 6. All irrigation ditches,ranaLs,Laterals,or drains:cxehrsivc of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or layingadjacent and contiguous to the arcs being subdivided shall he addrusscd per UIX' I 1-3Afi_ In performing,such work,the applicant shall comply with 1da6D Co nde 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must he properly abandoned according to Idaho Well C:Dnstruc6on%=daFd�Rules adminisLmrd.by lime Idaho I)gmrLment of Walcr Rcsourcc_s_ The FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) - 17- LX-YdvM-r's Enginaxr shall provide a YLAdumn mt addn:!ising whcthu there am any-uxis6ng wells in the development,and if-go,how they will continue to be used,or pTsvide record of their ahandon end H. Any existing septic systcros within this project shall be removed fiam-%-rvioe per CityOrclinwwc Section 944 and 9 4 8_ Contact Central District I Icalth for abandonment procedures and inspection{20ii}375-521 1. 9. All irnprovemcnu related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the strucitaTs- 10- Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works dcvclapment plan review,and construction inspccucm fees,as determined during the plan rcvjcw proem,pnar to the ua ancc 4Fa plan approval letter_ 11_ It shall he the resgxmsibu*of the applicant to-unsure that all dewelorpmcnt features comply with Lbe Americans with D7 sabilihes Act and the Fair dousing Act. 12_ Applicant shall be rcgaonsibJe for application and co rnpliance with any Seclian 404 Permitting tbal nag be required by the Army Corps Gf 1inpinocrv_ 13_ Developer shall coordinate mailbox Jacatjow with the Meridiem Part Office- 14. Comspaetion test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building L)gmr= nt for all building pads roDuiving engineered baekfill,where fasting would sit atop fill material_ 15_ The design engineer-9hall be rcquimd is certify that the suaet centerline elevations arc-set a minimum of 3-feet above the hipAml odablished peak groundwater clevation_ Thin is to en-gure that the bottom elevation of the crawl arpaces of homtes is at least I-fool above. 16_ Thcapplicants deign engineer shall be responiblu for iuspedion stall irritation andror drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or AC]ID.The design engineer shall pnrAdc certification that the facilities have been installed in acesrdancawith the appmvM design plan.This certification will be required before a vcnifwate of occupancy in is-sued for any gIructures withm the prfij-uct- 17_ At the completion of the ptalerlr the applicant~hall he msponsiblc to submit record drawings per the L*of Meridian AutoCA l)-AAnciar&_ These record drawin&a must be rowived and approved prior to the issuance of a certification ofoecupancy for any straziurais within the project_ Ili. A street light plan wil l need to he included in the civil comsuucticm plans.Street light plan requirements am listed hi smitinn 6w5 of the Improvarnent Standards for Street Lighting_A►copy of the standards can be Found at hup=l,'www=mcridianrily.or�(publin_vmrksa9px_�d-272_ 19_ The City of Meridian rcqujres that the owner post to the City a performance sruety in the amount of 1253E nfi the total connuuclion OWL for all incomplete sewer,wata-r and reuse infrasvtactutc prior to final Vial siptature_Thiq qurctywill be verified by a line item coat estimate provided by the owner to the City.The surety can he panted in the farm eFan irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can he found on the Ut mmunity IJevck pment 13cparltnent wcbsitc_ Please contact[,and[]cvclopmcnt Service for more information at 987-2211. 20_ The[Sty of Meridians requires that tiro oKmer past to the City a warranty surely in the amount of 20%of Ilrc total eanstruction cast for all completed sewer,water and reuse inf,astr,cuue#or dw-At on of fivo years-"Chin surety will be verified by line item coat estimate provided by Lhe owner to the City_The sur-uty can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can he found on the Community Dcwkq ncnt Dcparlmmt website_ Plca_w contact[,and De�lopmcnt tin-vice for more infiormalion at 887-2211. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) - 18- C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) Click or tap here to enter text. Pmadaw CHD .. V" wwaieY�herpr ranTNrerw avorloal*=oc%[4nmrrcow Date:tune 25¢-2C25 TO.]4(f Hach Staff Contact:Matt Pal.Plan rrer Pr-Djen E*scripti❑rt Ten Mile Flex Trip GWAradon This d�uelopnwent rs ss[�rr,a[ae[o gln�ra[e TT91lhrG1!trtips der drby, 21 vahKlb lei p Poe 00ur ill rh*pM p#ak t+ v r.bilt*d on[rt I nariivIe of Trardlo" t kwe Engineers Trip Generation Manual,TV edition- Cho fulure with plannc,-: C❑mmenM The tables abow liist the exiVti nQ conditiiu,s of the sw►oundin9 roadways wit*out the pr❑p€rsed development as this application i�for annexation and romrworiy.with a future ermi0onrhent appacstion,urls summarywlU be updated for lIM the OeVOk-pmentand its si- {rat, connecting you to more Ad■aou-AyuIgh—WDiFC-iG*-MW wLhWkri..W-iohmiD-ftns-PuXe-x"wa-rrs+o-�raa-,....wdW. V. FINDINGS A. Annexation(UDC 11-511-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) - 19- 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant's proposal to annex 5 acres of land with I-L zoning for the development of 15,900 square feet of multi-tenant industrial and 70,250 square feet of self- service storage (storage condos) is consistent with the Mixed Use Non-Residential FLUM designation for this property. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment to I-L and conceptual development plan generally complies with the purpose statement of the I-L district in that it will encourage industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are operated entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures and is accessible to an arterial street(i.e. Ten Mile Road). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed industrial use should be conducted entirely within a structure. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the city. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommend approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on August 2Pt,2025. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject annexation request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Jeff Hatch, Chris Adler b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Jeff Hatch and Chris Adler d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application:Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -20- a. The commission had a brief discussion about the reduced landscape buffers to the existing residences. They ultimately determined they had no concerns with this; however, it is a council decision. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)sus)for City Council: a. Council waiver to reduce the 25-foot landscape buffer to the existing residential properties to 10 feet to the south and west and 15 feet to the north. C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on September 9',2025. At the public hearing—the Council moved to approve the suWect annexation request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Jeff Hatch b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Jeff Hatch d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Council discussed traffic generation from the development and what the future road network looked like for this property and the neighboring properties. In addition.the Council had uestions out the proposed improvement for Doc Lane. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -21 - VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial Legend Project Location 0 r.1� f�1111 ;.%Area of Impact OAnalysis "a�V1 T } ' �r E r► FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -22- r • . 1 n►�,��uau iiii Y aAlOrrR'�*rriis iiiiers ini■ii ■af uAAr ,\I nor p�__,nu■IIr n uu R■ur:■ purr ■-{ 111 111 ram'.. nAu u1 Rd�r nnE=nm n nn . - Itlr mmulp■ urnn[ loss hmo ua m " uu _ Irlr ioR■u■uuui■ans nR real'�nErr1111 .■�r Riiil (. ■ ,r,�U ■ 11111 nn■i=qr lIRlr■aa■u,:i• �r r1rl� .._ - • �allll K. �� l' - i i11111fr- 1111111 -Illlli.. .., - sn.Ilffffflliiii�_�I-nr 'MCMILL-AN IIaJ ==a IlllllgT�� wn -rllnllnl fllnll Alll[ _ ■�111 CL= i E ,rua 1 Il�llllli rlllp 1nAllr -- i[r1'_ 111111 r� r �Illlllrlli alli -ul[Ill �� rIl1Al:�� - milli ' • 1lIR � _cell =IIIEAII' .f�flilll- f► �1! - aaaEEn one S- � �.rIr1I1 ��I q �t loom • -= ~ Ilh[I 11l1i Ir[I► Illrlll�- Lu in AID a iNl_ q $ w ra m- .■■Ir r af.j1lilJt Inrn 6 �W J Qa �A riiii� j p L■114tr�# J J ,,lil, � � ■ ■1lrl'r m Aiil' urr��o i11Aii■■� 1 11 :�. sinulr 111. mu■rq nlnArn. ##. - �Irlla��111111/1 � !aj '1u11 �, �■ � h1 11 /l all uuu 1llf r�►i`arllrli �,�,� 1 � .•� Irr� �w111 ;N r 1i■lr �'■'■riii now ff USTICK - — � I w■ 7 11..,\ as r: ae�aV 1 7 1■ri�ii -'! ��1 i■A ii mom 0Q7a■Hr� ®,■no. it �i um1 1 ' [[■� logo r so r=Rni iiiiiii■ monsoon", mil/ I IIIIIa -nl[i --ulumi u■[ ■inuull■!'Ir-. rirn• •1•■iii I "�Illr -AAlll. nnuinrU r!r •• • • •• • ■i-'tliil� ■ _ • ! - 7ii�� .111,Eli- !� _ 1[Ii ��Im-uu mn1�p�� Ida nlTnnr MCMILI=AN -- �fi11111111•Illnll 1 11111[ `_�~Ij �fFl��� �.. . ■ii- fl11111Arllli illllllr Illllllr _ -_ Ir1�� �1m111111L, �rmrnrnl nn 1. / e unm ==solo- mill ,' ;� r�Ie11111BE[AA111[1 9 Illlrll e■C -Qp'llllH rl ■ Irli+'�� ` I �i* slogan -=morn^---:H I/l1u IIIIIIIrI►,�IIHH � Eln!r�, � unlrp�rmunm �nur,�a�1 Ir� #v� �■ !r f,i rl � r#l#�IIIIIIIIEII Ta �i111 m►!�, I o n solo■ rr ■r1■NI, ra■1111� ::■a � I 1-I i.Ih�Ij� �.1QA'• I k� Ir1■:': -iii !sw::" ..drrrrP ;�,►� -:vNE low Inr■_- , r llluRir-■ � 11,1-:�� ■r 1111, •.:� f� rfl■noon-- : r I�q�-Wr �■� 1111 d111�1�m• [>:�!t-LI� W3.aaR�lAlnn► C Iq \ ++nln �uln,l rr■ai■ .,rr-7■■—.■.r ■■ . . USTICK— ' rnlllln i� ,� ■ nufllu i .r..._�+ ■I y■an n ■ Ill oil flmr nn■Errr uilr* - •■■■...■ u r,unmuu . inn ~+■..■ . �.■■■■■ ■ w uqn :i�1ru 1 `\��su■■- dial.nnrurr� Ia■■n i i a+: .■ ■■. /n nRE\ ■u.� ■. a �Rr ■ ■ ■ ,.�r .■■, ■■ r■ ■»�7a ant ■..■. 00■ular Legend 4. Planned Development Map U Project Location kFFH 0 Area of Impact ® ® caa gaa T=' City Limits Planned Parcels 1 ® _7 en � OAnalysts J ® . F : ® �tlRHH] o T ' FBE yits I 0� i O c no 0 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -24- B. Subject Site Photos r FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -25- C. Service Accessibility Report Overall Score: 22 10th Percentile Description ■ ■ Lc cation Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 ac--et GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 of current orfuture - -.sit r to RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master street= GREEN plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLOW Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR. a School ❑rivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile dr,,,e1n_-. GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -26- D. Site Plan/Phasing Plan (date: 7/28/2025) SHE RECAP AM! BUILDING AREA RECAP x -4 w IL • L LJ L.J 3 w i J --- -------- --------------- z -------- ------- _4------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------------ ------ -------------- ------ Ir .... . .... . ............ I . .................. . ... ..... SIFFE SITE PLAN PLAN A-1.0 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -27- PHASING NARRATIVE SITE RECAP 8;h�i' 0i RECAP BUILDING AREA x w LL X w ------- ------- ------- -------- J ---------------- --------- F/Z/ z ----------- w --------- - ---------- ...... t: ------- ------- ------- 0 -------- ....... Llid PHASING SITE PLAN PLAN \4V I I Building Elevations(date: 6/20/2025) EXTERIOR FINISH gS F SPECIFICATIONS NORTH ELEVATION &LDG I SOUTH ELEVATION BLDG I z WEST ELEVATION- BLDG 1 A- EAST ELEVATION - BLDG 1 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -28- EXTERIOR FIN15H SPECIFICATIONS S 4 liEL HORTH'ELEVATIOH - BLDG 1 sc)Llllh ELEVATION - RLOG-1I W J LL _ _ = W Z a 1W1 WEST EL f VATION - BLOC: I r ——ie riuw� i ---ioa� L1LI LNN)[ LIk YAIKlNS EAST ELEVATION - 6LDL: 1 A-4.11 EETIRI0' FINISH SPECIFIC AT I 0 N5 536 4 H ORIH ELEVATIOH - BLDG 3 0 SZUTH.,YELEVATION - BLOG S n J LL - W Z WEST ELEVATION - BLDG 3 ._ <._� LYIl1tlLili F1LYAlIL1NS EAST EL E YATION - BLDG 3 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -29- E}CiERIOR FINISH 5 PE CIFICAilONS � - u .--a�i� —•�YE�A NORTTH ELEVATION - BLDC:-:ate S0.UTH.ELEVA110N - BLDO A x J LL W — a J Z W W WEST ELEVA.T10r, 3LDG 4 --.yam LXIll:1[]R LLL.VAIE.IHS E A51 E L E V AT I - BLDC: 4 A-4A FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -30- E. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map ANNEXATION EXHIBIT SKETCH CITY OF MERIDIAN LGCATEp IN1NE✓>AIn_W WM OF 1HE NOL1+4A:TOLVKIER Gf SEGIIONSNIOVHiENIP4 Iv�RrH,RnNr,E1VAEST.BOISE MEpONN. PouN�ALuuNUM nr MPR�J P➢A GIXIN+Y.IWNO sEc usramN�R�w eW� CP6F HO P1201RL16i I I RPrv:5m3o1a2,25 I 11G 4 NTENLE ROPD -IAND 115RON +OMILE pEVELOF\EHi.LLC FNOkIRON ROp M [R31-NSB°l5',9-w 771.m Fi1MSS.N99°+Y<BYl1 __cw PLs^see— 589°15'O8"E 721.0 FTIMI Rvp o _ SC++LE:1'-w I � R FNO�'LMN ROD AN6 I 0 LL cPF PLs,eTEU p z �w W m WOD 2 i$$ ANNEXATION BOUNDARY i Z W_W y E c� 241.557 SQ FT I H 3 N? AOA COUNTY REFERENCE W QNzR R31-EcpP➢OFSURVEY-Rp3 NO.mE6 5.545Ac I z�c`�' ry+n �� Rse-REcpRnaF suRrEY-Rpsup.lzr.p °o R'..REc�aF suRYEr.Ros Nolte+i. � o � s4-REcor+noF SURVEY-Rpsxp. u R Z ussNTEN mue Roan ¢ I � Q711. on,rER:uPRY BawAUN I /y1 w ooc+ry I Poe r I FRNopp¢RRp acoNR 589`17'38"W 72117 FFTT](M` FRRNc6po}+A8rvr1Reodp c vAP � �+�8 1Qi04 � _�P AVN:smsa,e,ass R Nop1R«+RLOROGP ow5ENn�� ROD- RnEs LLc ANNEXATION FdRD BIW59 CAPMARNfil PL9 er R tia CITY OF MERIDIAN SUMMTFR co CCRN ERoFEROF BECK N. LOGITEp IN THE 80UFIfE'3r0UPR1EA OFTRE NORTIEI3TOVIM9EOF T.N.Rtrv,S.IA PA,C, SECT U.TdMJSHIP44TRTH,NNOE+riE5T.B0WWRElV4, LEGEND cPNF No.mxo+Rmm A➢AC0.TRY.[Wq ry STI P T @Ou ON rvOMY u PLSSTI IE RO1i PO1NTOF RECL+xxc ,/� E lL�4 IM7 FE 9uRE�06TwrCE oRAvm ev:sum wsT. ns wrE:u.mxi _______ MJ01rvINO,1ILE L1E Np er OORNERPERPE-DN-NGREGGRp E' ELEVATED coa cpvERA+ENr+R.ssE.ana+ERr I3OI sauARE—T capFllE:Ts oosas+�w LAND SURVEYING .NOTED Z AOREe TCUNGSURVEVM�NTASNOTEO Sssaa AL15,R B EETWAoF+ 4-2 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX-FILE H-2025-0027) -31 - AA�� ELEVATED LAND SURVEYING 3534 Apolena Ave_Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 ELEVATED1 pL-m-m(ci!elevatedIanckurvcyx_rnrrr 435-6334012 LAND SURV EYING ANNEXATION BOUNDARY A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 34_ Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the East Quarter corner of said Section 34; thence alone the section line North 00' 52' 43" East 307.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Running thence South SW 17'38"West 721.17 feet to a found 518"iron rod and no cap; Thence North 00° 51' 19" East 344,11 Not to a found 5f8" iron rod and cap marked pls 4998; Thence South 89' 15'00" East 721,03 feet to said section line; Thence along said section line South 00' 52' 43" West 325.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING_ CONTAINING; 5,W acres } r � i Z0907 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(TEN MILE FLEX—FILE H-2025-0027) -32- E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Idaho Power McDermott Substation H-2025-0008) Between City of Meridian and Idaho Power Company for Property Located at the Southwest Corner of McMillan Rd. and N. Owyhee Storm Ave. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-060223 Boise,Idaho Pgs=45 cfowler 09/17/2025 08:27:21 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Idaho Power Company, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 16th day of September ,2025,by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and Idaho Power Company, whose address is P.O. Box 70, Boise, Idaho 83707, hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the "Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-5B-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer have submitted an application for annexation and zoning of 2.69 acres of land with a request for the R-1.5 (Medium High- Density Residential) zoning district on the property as shown in Exhibit "A" under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 12th day of August, 2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION(H-2025-0008) PAGE 1 OF 7 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Idaho Power Company, whose address is P.O Box 70, Boise, Idaho 83707, hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER, the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION(H-2025-0008) PAGE 2 OF 7 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and the provisions contained herein. b. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to McMillan Road and Owyhee Storm Avenue. c. Future development of the site shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of development. d. Development of the subject property shall comply with the R-15 standards listed in UDC 11-2A-7 and UDC 11-4-3-31 Public Utility, Major, and Public Infrastructure. e. No portion of the outside storage areas and/or outside activity areas may be visible from the roadways. f. As irrigation is not currently available at the site, the Owner/Developer shall enter into an agreement to utilize City water for irrigation purposes. g. The Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a maximum period of five (5)years as approved by the City Council. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION(H-2025-0008) PAGE 3 OF 7 that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180)day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation,the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION(H-2025-0008) PAGE 4 OF 7 UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed, and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Idaho Power Company P.O. Box 70 Boise, Idaho 83707 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION(H-2025-0008) PAGE 5 OF 7 had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property ("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time, provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property,which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 21. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing rezoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; acknowledgements, signatures and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION(H-2025-0008) PAGE 6 OF 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Idaho Power Company By (name):-04,1�'P Its (title): S State of Idaho ) ss: County of Ada ) On this day of CCP4f Ok�-Or ,2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared-Namcj known or identified to me to be the Sewir• trevw, riUM, _of Idaho Power Company and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed y official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. CHRISTb*HI!'RWJACKY Not Publi Notary Public-State of Idaho My Comm' Fen Expires: / J3— 3 Q Commission Number 41055 My Commission Expires Jul 23,2030 CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: Luke Cavener, Council President 9-16-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 9-16-2025 State of Idaho ) ) ss. County of Ada) On this 16th day of September,2025,before me, a Notary Public,personally appeared Luke Cavener and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Council President and City Clerk respectively, of the City of Meridian,who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal of the day and year in this certificate first above written: Notary Public for Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION(1-1-2U2�-0006) VAUE /OF / EXHIBIT A lam E N G I N E E R I N G February 19,2025 Project No. 22-189 Annexation and Rezone to R-15 Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 and the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32,Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 32,which bears S89°22'22"E a distance of 2,646.45 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 32; Thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4,589'21'51"E a distance of 25.00 feet to the centerline of N.Owhyhee Storm Ave.; Thence leaving said northerly line and following said centerline,500'36'45"W a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence leaving said centerline, N89'22'22"W a distance of 25.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N89°22'22"W a distance of 330.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N00'36'45"E a distance of 330.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar on the northerly line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; Thence following said northerly line,S89°22'22"E a distance of 330.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 2.689 acres, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \oNA1 LAND S E N SFD G � � o zo 6 nqT£ OF ��<< H Y ty5�� 2/rq/2025 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 2€18.639.6939 • kmengllp.com POINT OF BEGINNING FOUND ALUMINUM CAP NORTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 32 FOUND ALUMINUM CAP W. McMillan Rd. NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 32 BASIS OF BEARING 30 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S89'22'22"E 2646.45. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 s89.22'22"E 330.00' 29. 31 32 32 i1] `3 S89'21 '51 "E N 25.00' I I N 0 60 120 180 > Q oI o N N a Plan Scale: 1" = 60' o °' L- o �T o M QI M N II0 Uj v Rezone Area: 2.689±ACQj o ro APN: SO432212450 ;n " Current Zoning: RUT p Proposed Zoning: R-15 0l C) aco z 1 V Ian z N I , z I U' 25.00' X 4 l7 E2 X l - z I 0 a 4 N89'22'22"W w 25.00' ° o N89'22'22"W 330.00' N • N Q�pL LANo Unplatted EN sG N c sFo C CD, -� o a � °- 0 06 Q . - z LO o F OF NYNS FOUND ALUMINUM CAP o lam CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 32 ai ai ENGINEERING « 2aZ5 U 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY BOISE,IDAHO 83713 PHONE{208)639-6939 Exhibit B 1" kmengllp.mm Annexation and Rezone to R-15 w DATE: February 2025 PROTECT: 22-189 SHEET: A portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 and the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of a 1 OF 1 Section 32, T4N., R1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho Title: Date: 02-12-2025 Scale: 1 inch=60 feet File: Deed Plotter.des Tract 1: 2.689 Acres: 117151 Sq Feet: Closure=n00.3754e 0.00 Feet: Precision=1/364623: Perimeter=1370 Feet 001=s89.2151e 25.00 004=nS9.2222w 330.00 002= 00.3645w 330.00 005=n00.3645e 330.00 003—n89.2222w 25.00 006=s89.2222e 330.00 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C��(IEFI DIAN-, AND DECISION& ORDER a In the Matter of the Request for annexation and Conditional Use Permit,by Stephanie Hopkins, KM Engineering. Case No(s).H-2025-0008 For the City Council Hearing Date of: July 22, 2025 (Findings on August 12,2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 22,2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 22,2025,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 22,2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 22, 2025, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 22,2025, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION-FILE#H-2025-0008) - 1 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 22,2025, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC I 1-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two(2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION-FILE#H-2025-0008) -2- City Code Title I I(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter.When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 22,2025. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION-FILE#H-2025-0008) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 12th day of August 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED-AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert Si ison 8-12-2025 Attest: z �ac- Chris Johns City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Cha&wW Dated: 8-12-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(IDAHO POWER MCDERMOTT SUBSTATION-FILE#H-2025-0008) -4- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (�/WERJDIAN�- DEPARTMENT REPORT s D A H HEARING 7/22/2025 Legend _ DATE: CO Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council Area of Impact , City Limits e FROM: Linda Ritter, Associate Planner ®Analysis 208-884-5533 Iritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Stephanie Hopkins, K1VI Engineering, LLP , - m SUBJECT: H-025-0008 9 Idaho Power McDermott Substation Annexation and CUP LOCATION: SW corner of McMillan Road and N. Owyhee Storm Avenue,located in the NW 1/a NW 1/a SEC 32 4N 1 W, Parcel No. SO432212450 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 2.69 acres of land from RUT in Ada County to the R-15 zoning district and a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) to allow the development of an Idaho Power substation. B. Issues/Waivers The applicant will be requesting alternative compliance to increase the height of the proposed wall and fence to eight(8)feet in order to maintain site security and deter trespassing at a later date upon approval of the annexation. C. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation per the conditions of approval included in Section IV in accord accordance with Findings in Section V. D. Decision City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Public infrastructure - Existing Zoning RUT VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning R-15 Adopted FLUM Designation Medium High Density Residential VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation NA Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 1/7/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 2/26/2025 Site posting date 5/22/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.E • Comments Received Yes/Staff Report - • Commission Action Required No - • Access McMillian Road existing arterial - • Traffic Level of Service Better than E - ITD Comments Received No comments IV.F Meridian Public Works Wastewater ' IV.B • Distance to Mainline Sewer available at the site • Impacts or Concerns See Public Works site specific conditions Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Water available at the site • Impacts or Concerns None Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions for comments received. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S0432212450 Date Retrieved:2025/4/ 14 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: Surrounding Area 1,08 1,85 7 6% Not City L755 M ® City Limits ID582.4 ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:87.5% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family ❑ Multi-family 190% 190% ® Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 500 1000 1500 0 100 200 31 ■ Single-family ® Multi-family City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics 2.00 �� 1,000 41 Single-family Residential 1.50 Parcel Diversity CA 1.00 500 U 0Parcel Count in 0.50 I 0 + 0.25 0.14 0 *Average Acres � 0.00 0:0 .07_ 0 a R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 O 13.88 L DensityResidential Net Q 10.00 D 06.91 6.38 5.00 03.99 0.00 �o.00 Dwelling Units / Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Notes: See VIIL Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. Figure 2: ACHD Summary Metrics Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH) Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service McMillan Road 330-feet Minor Arterial 386 Better than"E" Owyhee Storm Avenue 305-feet Collector 230 Better than"D" 'Acceptable level of service for a two-lane minor arterial is"E"(575 VPH). "Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is"D"(425 VPH). 2. Average Daily Traffic Count(VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. • The average daily traffic count for McMillan Road east of McDermott Road was 6,747 on January 25,2024. • The average daily traffic count for Owyhee Storm Avenue south of McMillan Road was 4,321 on January 25,2024. Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 3: Service Impact Summary Se vice I m pact Tools Ready Marginal Caution o a c a a L° fro fro Qa Notes: See VIIL Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The Future Land Use Map(FLUM) designates the area proposed to be annexed as "Medium High Density"This designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. The applicant is requesting to zone the property R- 15. The applicant is proposing the construction of a new Idaho Power substation to enhance the reliability and resilience of electrical service in Meridian and the surrounding areas of Ada County. Currently,customers in this region are served by the Can-Ada Substation in Nampa and the Ten Mile Substation in Meridian. However,rapid and ongoing growth throughout the Treasure Valley has placed increased demand on these existing facilities,leading to service strain and reduced reliability. The proposed substation is strategically designed to accommodate future growth and development,while also alleviating pressure on the existing infrastructure. By re-routing service lines,the new facility will not only serve new residential and commercial customers but also improve service continuity and reliability for current users. This use is permitted within the R-15 zoning district upon the approval of a Conditional Use Permit and compliance with the specific use standards for both Public Utility,Major and Public Infrastructure. The proposed project aligns with these standards and is essential to support the area's long-term utility needs. Table 4:Project Overview Description Details History ROS No. 13689 Physical Features Vacant Lot Acreage 2.50 acres B. History The property resides within Ada County and is currently zoned RUT. The property owner did a one-time property division on October 26, 2022,to create this 2.50-acre lot. See Record of Survey below. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements(UDC 11-1): The property is currently vacant,the applicant is proposing to construct,maintain, and operate an electrical substation on an undeveloped parcel of land in northwest Meridian. The new McDermott Distribution Substation will connect to the existing electrical grid and provide increased capacity and reliability to existing and new customers in Meridian, Ada County, and the surrounding area. The applicant will need to submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Design Review(DES) application for review and approval prior to building submittal. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2 and 11-4-3-31): The proposed use"public infrastructure"requires a conditional use permit for the R-15 zoning district. A. Accessory uses directly related to the maintenance and fueling of vehicles (including,but not limited to,truck and trailer washing,fuel pumps, garages for minor repair)may be allowed. Not applicable B. Installation of underground fuel tanks shall require written approval from the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality,Idaho Department of Water Resources, and the appropriate fire authority. Not appliable as the applicant is not proposing underground fuel tanks. C. No portion of the outside storage areas and/or outside activity areas may be visible from any highway,interstate,gateway corridor,principal arterial, or minor arterial as herein defined. Staff determined no outside storage will be visible from the roadways and this will be a condition of the permit. D. All driveways into and through the facility and any open area with a driving surface shall be surfaced with a dustless material including,but not limited to, asphalt,concrete, pavers or bricks. Staff determined the all driving surfaces are being constructed with dustless material. E. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand(1,000)feet from a hospital. Staff determined the facility is located at a minimum of 1,000 feet from a hospital. 3. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The proposal will be required to meet the dimensional standards for setbacks,parking requirements, maximum building height,landscape buffers and landscape requirements and for the R-15 zoning district and the requirements of UDC 11-4-3-31 Public Utility,Major; and Public Infrastructure. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): The applicant is proposing to develop the site with a substation that includes the following: up to two transformers, each to serve four distribution feeders;up to two breakers beneath the transmission termination structure; up to two metalclad structures, which manage switching of distribution feeders; one small control building,which houses racks of switches and communication equipment; and one transmission dead-end structure,which connects with the transmission line on McMillian Road). The substation yard is graveled to allow for safe operation of the ground-grid system underneath the surface. The gravel is specific for utility use,typically 3-inch rock that also allows for water drainage. Since no vehicle parking occurs within the substation,there will be no paved surfaces inside the yard. 2. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot landscape buffer is required along McMillan Road and a 20-foot landscape buffer along Owyhee Storm Avenue. Both street buffers will include a ten(10')foot wide City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis detached sidewalk/multi-use pathway and landscaping in accordance with the requirements of the UDC. The applicant will need to revise the landscape plan to meet UDC-11-3B-7,if the unimproved street right-of-way is ten(10)feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line,the developer shall maintain a ten- foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover. ii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses Although the development of the power substation is located within a residential zoning district, the applicant is proposing a thirty(30)foot landscape buffer to the west and south of the property to mitigate any noise that may be generated from the substation. iii. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10, the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two (2) ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees).Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. iv. Storm integration Per UDC 11-3B-11, the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural,effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated, well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green stormwater facilities into required landscape areas,where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. Development will be required to meet UDC 11-3B-11 for stormwater integration. v. Pathway landscaping Landscaping for pathways shall meet the requirements outlined in UDC 11-3B-12. The applicant is required to provide a landscape strip a minimum of five(5) feet wide shall along each side of the pathway.Designs are encouraged in which the width of the landscape strip varies to provide additional width to plant trees farther from the pathway, preventing root damage. The minimum width of the landscape strip shall be two (2)feet to allow for maintenance of the pathway. The landscape strips shall be planted with a mix of trees, shrubs,lawn, and/or other vegetative ground cover. The applicant is proposing landscaping along the multiuse pathways along McMillian Road and Oywhee Storm Avenue. 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Residential parking analysis Not applicable ii. Nonresidential parking analysis As there is no building and this is an unmanned site,parking spaces are not required. Bicycle parking analysis As there is no building and this is not a manned site, bicycle parking is not required. City of Meridian I Department Report II1. Staff Analysis 4. Building Elevations(Comp Plan 5.01.02D,Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual elevations were submitted for the proposed substation as shown in Section VILD. Although there is no building, that applicant is proposing an eight(8)foot tall A pre-cast stamped concrete wall along the McMillian Road and Owyhee Storm Avenue frontages. Staff is requiring the wall extended around the entire substation. Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and recorded development agreement. The Comprehensive Plan's goal is to require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods. 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC I I- 3A-7. The applicant is proposing a pre-cast stamped concrete wall along the McMillan Road and Owyhee Storm Avenue frontages. The applicant is also proposing a chain-link fence with barbed wire along the west and south boundaries. However, barbed wire is prohibited in residential zoning districts.As the proposed substation will eventually be surrounded by residential development, staff recommends that the applicant install the pre-cast stamped concrete wall along all sides of the substation for consistency and compliance with residential standards. E. Transportation Analysis I. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): The applicant is requesting access points on W. McMillan Road and N. Owyhee Storm Avenue, to be designed in accordance with Ada County Highway District(ACHD) requirements. These two access points are necessary to safely accommodate the maneuvering of large transport vehicles during infrequent deliveries of major electrical equipment such as transformers, breakers, or metal-clad switchgear to the substation. Under typical operating conditions, a single access point will generally be sufficient to support routine inspection and maintenance activities. 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC I1-3A-5): Multiuse pathways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan, the Meridian Pathways Master Plan, the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. 3. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. The applicant is proposing a ten(10')foot wide detached sidewalk/multi-use pathway along McMillian Road and Owyhee Storm Avenue frontages. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): Not applicable 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 3. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.03G, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development.All utilities are available to the site. Water main,fire hydrant and water service require a twenty foot(20)wide easement that extends ten(10)feet past the end of main, hydrant, or water meter. No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G requires urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A certificate of zoning compliance application will not be accepted until the annexation ordinance and development agreement are approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to McMillan Road and Owyhee Storm Avenue. c. Future development of the site shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of development. d. Development of the subject property shall comply with the R-15 standards listed in UDC 11-2A-7 and UDC 11-4-3-31 Public Utility,Major, and Public Infrastructure. e. No portion of the outside storage areas and/or outside activity areas may be visible from the roadways. f. As irrigation is not currently available at the site,the applicant shall enter into an agreement to utilize City water for irrigation purposes. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions g. The Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a maximum period of five(5)years as approved y the City Council. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Outdoor lighting shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-11. Lighting details shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application that demonstrates compliance with these standards. 2. The landscape plan shall be revised to meet UDC -11-3B-7, if the unimproved street right-of- way is ten(10) feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, the developer shall maintain a ten-foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover. 3. The applicant shall submit an alternative compliance request for the 8-foot tall stamped concrete wall along all boundaries of the site for review and approval. Barbed wire is prohibited in residential districts per UDC 11-3A-7. 4. Provide a 30-foot landscape buffer to the south and west side of the property per the approved site plan. 5. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Design Review application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed wall prior to submitting a building permit application. The design of the site and structures shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19; the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 6. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of ACHD. 7. Staff's failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. 8. The conditional use permit is valid for a maximum period of bye4 4)five(5)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the Applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6. A time extension may be requested as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6F. B. Meridian Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. All dry utilities need to be at least 4' from the water main. Power poles need to be at least 5' from the Water main. 2. No permanent structures are allowed in easements including covered parking,light poles and trees. Correct all areas that apply. 3. Engineer to verify if there is a well onsite. If a well is located on the site it must be abandoned per regulatory requirements and proof of abandonment must be provided to the City. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department. 2. Per Meridian City Code (MCC),Extension of sewer mains to and through the site is not required as part of this application,per direction from the City Engineer. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). Sewer/water easement varies depending on sewer depth. Sewer 0-20 ft deep require a 30 ft easement, 20-25 ft a 40 ft easement, and 25-30 ft a 45 ft easement. Ensure no permanent structures (trees,bushes, buildings,carports, trash receptacle walls,fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.) are built within the utility easement. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 5. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches,canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 9. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id=272. 19. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 20. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. Meridian Park's Department 1. The project developer shall design and construct multi-use pathways consistent with the location and specifications set forth in the Meridian Pathways Master Plan Map and Master Pathways Plan Document Chapter 3). Any proposed adjustments to pathway alignment shall be coordinated through the Pathways Project Manager. Interactive Pathway Map 2. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall dedicate a public access easement for the detached multi-use pathways within the landscape buffers along W. McMillan Rd. and S. Owyhee Storm Ave. Easements shall be a minimum of 14'wide(10'pathway+2' shoulder each side). Easement need only be dedicated to the City for multi-use pathways that lie outside the public ROW. Use standard City template for public access easement. Submit all easements online through Citizen's Access Portal. 3. Construct multi-use pathways per paving section based on existing site conditions as recommended by project civil engineer in accord with UDC 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12. Prior to final approval the applicant's engineer shall provide written documentation that the pathway segment was constructed per the recommended specifications. 4. The owner(or representative association) of the property affected by each public access easement shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain the multi-use pathway. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) hops://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=389735&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit Y- E. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) hops://weblink.meridiancity.orgAl ebLinkBrowse.aspx?id=389735&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X F. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.orgAl ebLink/Browse.aspx?id=389735&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X G. Ada County Development Services hops://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=389735&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X H. Irrigation Districts 1. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District https://weblink.meridiancity.oEg6i ebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=389735&dbid=0&repo=Meridia nCi V. FINDINGS A. Annexation(UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)designates the site as Med-High Density Residential("MHDR"). In accordance with this designation, Idaho Power has requested annexation and zoning to R-15 zoning designation. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds the planned use of the subject property is a substation that will be operated and maintained by Idaho Power. The UDC identifies the proposed use as `public infrastructure" that is permitted in the R-15 zone with the approval of a CUP. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Council finds annexation with an R-15 zoning designation will not be detrimental to public health, safety, and/or welfare. Idaho Power is committed to the safety, health, and welfare of their employees, customers, and the communities that they serve. Proposed site design, fencing and vegetation has been designed to ensure the security of the substation while providing an attractive facility. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds the annexation of the subject property and the proposed use of a substation will not impact the delivery of public services by any provider. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Council finds the annexation of the site is in the best interest of the City as it will facilitate the expansion of Idaho Power's service in this area and throughout the Treasure Valley. B. Conditional Use(UDC 11-5B-6E) The commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Council finds the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed substation and provide adequate space to safely operate and maintain the facility. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Council finds the proposed substation is in accordance with the goals and policies found in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. That the design,construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Council finds the proposed substation is an integral part of the landscape, similar to other types of infrastructure that deliver essential services to our communities. Idaho Power is proposing to make every effort to keep the property compatible with the character of the area. The design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the substation will complement the existing agriculture and residential character and the intended medium high density residential character by improving the capacity of Idaho Power's operations to effectively serve existing and future customers in the area. The applicant is proving a site obscuring wall and landscaping around the perimeter of the site to screen the operation. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. Commission finds the proposed substation will be located entirely on private property.A combination of site obscuring fencing and a landscape buffer will be installed around the perimeter of the site, ensuring that the substation will not negatively impact neighboring properties. The proposed Idaho Power substation will enhance service to local customers and positively affect the surrounding area. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water, and sewer. Council finds the proposed Idaho Power substation will be served adequately by essential public facilities required for the operation of the facility. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Council finds the substation will not create additional costs for public facilities and services. As the proposed Idaho Power substation operations will improve the economic welfare of the community. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes,materials,equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,noise, smoke,fumes, glare or odors. Council finds the proposed Idaho Power substation will not produce excessive traffic, noise, smoke,fumes, glare or odors as traffic will be limited to Idaho Power employees only. Idaho Power employees typically visit a substation once a month. No excessive noise will be generated during the operations of the proposed substation.Any operational noises will not exceed 65 dB(decibels)per the Code of Federal Registry Section 24.An analogy of 65 dB sound level would be a normal conversation at a three(Y)foot distance. No other activities will be occurring at the site. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction,loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Council finds the subject parcel has been used as agriculture and no natural, scenic, or historic features were identified. 9. Additional findings for the alteration or extension of a nonconforming use: Not Applicable 10. That the proposed nonconforming use does not encourage or set a precedent for additional nonconforming uses within the area; and, Not Applicable 11. That the proposed nonconforming use is developed to a similar or greater level of conformity with the development standards as set forth in this title as compared to the level of development of the surrounding properties. Not Applicable VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation per the conditions of approval included in Section IV in accord accordance with Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on June 26, 2025.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject annexation and conditional use permit requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Stephanie Hopkins and David Garrett representing the property owner b. In opposition: None C. Commenting d. Written testimony: None L. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Stamped concrete wall surrounding the entire property rather than a chain link fence on the south and west side of the property as the project will eventually be surrounded by residential development on all sides. 4. Commission changes)to Staff recommendation: a. None City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 22, 2025. At the public hearing, the Council moved to approve the subject annexation and Conditional Use Permit requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Stephanie Hopkins and David?representing the property owner b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: one 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Deferral of the landscaping and irrigation system b. Extending the Conditional Use Permit from two (2)years to five(5)years 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Added a DA provision to extend the Conditional Use Permit to a maximum period of five(5)years City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial Legend I Project Location 0 Area of Impact - • Analysis . .« \.. �•�MMR PAN 0 iy• !'+of 1yv'� 11 J.r ,s r. N �— r j"% _. i • 2. Zoning Map v Legend Project Location Area of Impact - OAnalysis ®�vvv L R-1.5 A _ RA RUT m �® R1 , R-8 R f V L=O'' RUT Nat I ,M-E'er City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits - I llllllllllllllr ,� '�"►:� I„tl� Legend Project Location ==11111.11111__ 1111 IArea of Impact nunmly IN Analysis Uff iurrrli..••� Densiti"inn Inur'���„\i��♦�i�D�l/ IIIII►�i����Op ��,1� O IIIIII GI$l:��p� O��i�niii IIIII IA������ IIIIIIII "�unnn! mI w � W ::":��IIIIIIID�III CIIIIIIII � � -_r`I nmm�Ilnn nmu m �i U I �_CC��1 nnnunl►4nun1��unnnri nn �I � ����� I nnnnmllllnm- mnl'nn - I nnmm�u nnn nun mI MCMI'L-L-AN - - -�_ ► � nunnnl6lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII►� �IIIIIIIIIIIIII ���' �►\���IIi41 nr� Illlq III��11111111IIIIIIIII/� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _ _ p Illp 11111111 111111111�1 �117�• _ �,rl�=�' --�1113 111111111111111r:/'Il:�' ---Gm I nunl ,�G, nm■Vj�'a�gm1V/�1�ij���iin: ¢�- - , 1 u►ulu� uW a: 1j1 All i�II Am n � � � � ►nn/r/� I��:.111 111� ���� III►I I IIIIIIII IIII I���p IIIIIIIII 0 o � ► •►f� � - i - _ nlnl..rem�_'_:_ �IIIII 111�\.�C rennin - • • I - ( IIIII IIIIIIIII_ II � l�h►►1►��� III/I`I IIIIIIIII IIIIIpp'II � \\Illllllu'i III! /��III �`�� IIIIIIII■O � _IIIIII►►� _ - • - • 11111111111►� I =�p1111111 - 0 1 _==umnmJ• nnlllll►..-AIIIIi�I/IIIIII o�nnm - OC `Q .J111111 r 111114 _ 1„�„1� v' _11111111 f t I11111111� 1 ity Legend (] Project Location ......Tun p� -Om. r Ep""Area of Impact f1111' e IIII...IIIIIIIII i11111111i'��i j� _ eonnm Innnmly rumi.d♦� 1111111111111111111\lam r--���1 L unl�: (IIIIII IIIII �1 =- Q 4nnI10Ii�ICOQ�" "�,�Ii�uiii 5ilnuml qu � dI11 I�fl��,�i� •IIIIIIII umm�lllll , _----��II(-IIIP► � _- "" ♦ (,IIIIIIII � _a=_unnll ♦►♦ ♦ � = �� ?--711111111 � a"���/IIIIIIII♦ �1111 III � =.IIIIIIIII W "���IIIIIIID�III �11111111 n1111 G �_r�unmr Tim mnn m nnnuu= t. _ ��nunnn0�iuunl�nnuul nn = iummlll= U (III Illlllllllli= ' 1111 C n111I Inl ■� -�Illllllllllllp � 111� mnllnu -- M C M I� —-- __ �-. 1%.III�III�IIIII_E 1►• �ilnnnnm .T=I. City Limits — Planned Parcels 0 Analysis - �■-ru--luu•�,\qi"li-b11/-1,IRr- n 11 n�j IIIIII(IIIIIIIII -__ IIIIII Illlllln��11/ �np p•_rl 11111111 IIIIIIII/�I. ���-• --_%�u III I IIIII II��;�11111111111 IV i���I��/I/�111 iD■nnnn► •• :• nn1►m:•AIn11 �p1l��imin °1O11II►►� � II 4 I III II��Ig111 ������I11n1 ►Ippr/►�iii11 rIl a; Irliiilpl. IIIIII j111 ��IIIIIIIII ,- ►IIIO.:rem■ i►i►�' II�•/IIIIII II��♦_��IIIIIIII jinn___ lure, :� ,►iI r��IIIIIp IIIII=�IIIIIIIII -, IIIII nuum�-���_ _ I`hnIDD I/II`I �IIIIIIII n11111►�1 iiiliiiiiutl DIIIIIIID /ICI IpIu11►►• ��IIII�♦ (III i 1fill ,gip -nnnD�♦nn/1� I IIIpI JJ� e�II►p►►I\�11110���1lli II ni, �IIIIIIO,IIIIIII e�-111�♦ tpi11111 { �i(IIIIII IIIII 2 fiu' Illl lllln'�.�IIIU=-IIIII� 1111111111 �:1La1.7I"�.t�GI:I�2e:e50e a o mmnlll 1'11,11� e ream - nnnnl. �nnn11 -Iiiiiiiii _ 1 `unnn • I /'1 • '11 1 5. Map Notes Nearby Recent Preliminary Plats(within last 5-years) H-2018-0075 H-2021-0078 H-2022-0052 H-2022-0056 H-2023-0011 Nearby Recent Conditional Use Permits (within last 5-years) H-2019-0013 H-2019-0133 H-2020-0025 H-2020-0093 H-2021-0065 H-2022-0056 H-2020-0047 B. Site Plan(date: 4/3/2025) . r 1 ^MCMILLAN RD. n.. ii L i44 I . , • 1 t t11 •..ti Jcl • � W 83 W I . . . . . . . . . . . km City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Landscape Plan(date: 4/3/2025) per 41,.1,r.,T, W T --mw O 0 coo 0 e2gbPL.AN &NM M km Ll 0 City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits rt [ 1 J Y� T ; •1 4 I e - I f �7 - vr� ♦r .� 'v �t� �.� , 'yam, •�..7�.��•, � s .�' s'� Ft xy- Y �'' re` _. _ -," ?;.. `, �.,Y3s` ,a,,4z„`t:lF �r A� -,s. •,-�+. � y �'►,�, !� _r ♦ � „aecs fi. �, r'��-L;,'�"r 4 s ti �,yvyq � q,,; �- ' "'`�r 10• e+-+:; m'°r '��- Ml W♦' .x'A y j47��� "•��.. �'� "car ?z"zi�.�.13,Q.i�_;.yM� ice_-R ._ 1 . . '� f • -� �.. -"t ..\ - tom'•:.` '��i,?y,v�r .,�`�'"►�{1+ �+'y`4'^ . t it ,;fr;.�r •'�, -�-r� ��",��'.7�'kr�nY.,, �s�-^Y.rt `�•<..>` s ��'a., 3�-^ a„� .- r. ..�++�..; ,s�i•. � ��� � �,.9t -, � Chi"sF�R�• F R ♦ y�� y;;• LR 7M E. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map lam E N G I N E E R I N G February 19,2025 Project No.22-189 Annexation and Rezone to R-15 Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 and the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 32,Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a found aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 32,which bears S89.22'22"E a distance of 2,646.45 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the Northwest corner of said Section 32; Thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4,S89"21'51"E a distance of 25.00 feet to the centerline of N.Owhyhee Storm Ave.; Thence leaving said northerly line and following said centerline,S00°36'45"W a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence leaving said centerline,N89.22'22"W a distance of 25.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N89.22'22"W a distance of 330.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar; Thence N00°36'45"E a distance of 330.00 feet to a found 5/8-inch rebar on the northerly line of said Northeast 114 of the Northwest 1/4; Thence following said northerly line,S89.22'22"E a distance of 330.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 2.689 acres,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \oNpl LANs 5S ��CENSfp �L o � 20 6 A LPJ �O 7TF OF 0 Y NS() 2 19/2o25 5725 North Discovery Way•Boise,Idaho 83713•208.639.6939•kmengllp.com City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits POINT OF BEGINNING FOUND ALUMINUM CAP NORTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 32 FOUND ALUMINUM CAP W. McMillan Rd. NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION 32 BASIS OF BEARING • . S89'22'22"E 2646.45. • • • . 130 29 S89'22'22"E 330.00' 29 0 31 32 32 S89'21'51"E _y N 25.00' I I N I � � 0 0 60 120 180 Q o x o Plan Scale:1"=60' o I 00 0, E M MI M M O M n M N to G w Rezone Area:2.689±AC LO 3 3 v a APN:SO432212450 if) 'r T Q o Current Zoning:RUT o l o O Proposed Zoning:R-15 M IoN z I o z I 25.00' 0 I I 1 N89'22'22"W 0 25.00' N89'22'22"W 330.00' o O�pL LA/yo Unplatted \�CENSfpSG rn s 0 06 p " 9lF OF 6'q HYNSOj FOUND ALUMINUM CAP f o 5 CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 32 kin 2 ENGINEERING 19 2425 0 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY PHONE(208)639.6939 Exhibit B k—allp— Annexation and Rezone to R-15 DATE Febrwry2025 } PROJECT 22 189 - g A portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 and the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of 4 SHEET: 1 OF 1 Section 32,T4N., R1W., B.M.,Ada County, Idaho City of Meridian I Department Report V11. Exhibits Title: Date:02-12-2025 Scale: 1 inch=60 feet File:Deed Plotter.des Tract 1: 2.689 Acres: 117151 Sq Feet:Closure=n00.3754e 0.00 Feet: Precision=1/364623: Perimeter=1370 Feet 001=s89.215le 25.00 004=n89.2222w 330.00 002=s00.3645w 330.00 005=n00.3645e 330.00 003-n89.2222w 25.00 006-s89.2222e 330.00 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Record of Survey(10/26/2022) RECORD OF SURVEY ROS No.='- FOR A ONE-TIME DIVISION NORTHERN LAND HOLDINGS,LLC A RARCEEOF IAND SITUATED IN A RORTION OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 214OF SECTION 32.TOWNSHIR4 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO. 2022 °0 W..,Mill..Road ENnsula.x.xse xw z°zx-m»2° acsrs w eF.wsws ———— ————— sevzx'zxt ___________________ war aar iy zezx-ae»x]30 29 ]aM22'22'E 10xa.53' 29 3 33 -xw.ar c .. Sa9.22.22'E]] '_ - -$ R RarcelB $ %% � 2.500t AC I c'�V[wr pw o°Re I x 8� Ne9.2VUl]]0.00' se9.22.27-E 25.01 byayW s 8 I sz.Hs..x. �r• S I °sees. i i f V S9.626t AC I pa ramp i/x°�w"n[ew x $�i I. tea€ C / \ " W rM INpn. l i i $ — ---- T----------------------------Rich \ .8 ------ -------- /- xs.aR'Uq cwncMrw H px \ P xecxD•sT^W s42.23• NOTte'da'W 92.02' - .c. _____________� XaT33'24'W x505.]e'.____________ _ _ y I wt�55 j' �FLg T I I I 32 xe�"wu"ms�°`»zgiiessse\ I 31 ------ IEGEND REFERENCES CERTIFICATE Of COUNTY RECORDER CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYOR "°,Epw ;N N G WN D ———— .RM ; °,Ep °.. °ap.n°� M w.p,° x.a Ww w MT, °µ�: a D B D C. "HU""' SURVEY NARRATIVE -El eo,rt O p S/z/a �d¢YaAe_ dd E N O I Np F F I NO � "co° ,"vunx vs sex w.s rawio m a m �<Y aEMd"p o ]NASRw F".=<. wrwW"a.,�."�"x. rEE�I�DD roK•.• I.wwW".,.� Ep City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL SO432212450 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 21 8th Percentile Criteria Description Location Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains > 2,000 ft.from parcel Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr Foodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets YELLOW plan) > existing (#of lanes) & road IS in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type City of Meridian I Department Report V11. Exhibits H. Subject Site Photos r b - City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES & DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days. Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel.Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development, government, and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2 < 5.0; R-4 < 2.0; R-8 < 1.0; R-15 < 0.5; R-40 < 0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries (TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.).Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources,including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain,fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F.Letter A represents free flow conditions, and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian I Department Report VII1. Additional Notes &Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D, stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians, nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary,from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes &Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Agreement for Supplies to Polydyne, Inc. for Polymer FY2025- 2026 for the Not-To-Exceed Price Per Pound of$1.38 and resulting Purchase Order in the amount of$303,600 (::� WE N DIAN:--- MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Darren Brasseur, Procurement Division Meeting Date: September 16, 2025 Presenter: Consent Estimated Time: N/A Topic: Approval of Agreement for Supplies to Polydyne, Inc. for Polymer FY2025-2026 for the Not-To-Exceed Price Per Pound of $1.38 and resulting PO in the amount of $303,600. Recommended Council Action: Approval of Agreement for Supplies to Polydyne, Inc. for Polymer FY2025-2026 for the Not-To- Exceed Price Per Pound of$1.38 and authorize the Procurement Manager to sign and issue the resulting PO in the amount of$303,600. Background: • This Agreement for Supplies and resulting PO are the result of Formal Bid#WW-2526- 11617 that closed at 2:30 PM on Monday 6/23/2025. Two (2) bids were received. CONTRACT CHECKLIST I. PROJECT INFORMATION Date: 9/9/2025 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Wastewater Project Name: Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept.FY2025-2026 Project Manager: Warren Hudson Contract Amount: $303,600.00 Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Is this a change order? yes ❑ No 0 Change Order No. II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) III. Contract Type Fund: 65 Budget Available(Purchasing attach report): Department 3510 Yes 0 No ❑ Construction ❑ GL Account 52015 FY Budget: 2026 Task Order ❑ Project Number: 11617 Enhancement: Yes ❑ No 0 Professional Service ❑ Supplies or Equipment 0 Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes❑ No Grant ❑ IV. GRANT INFORMATION-to be completed only on Grant funded projects Grant#: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status(Federal Funded) N/A N/A N/A N/A Print and Attach the determination Print,attach and amend bid by addendum(if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach V. BASIS OF AWARD BID RFP/RFQ TASK ORDER Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected Master Agreement Category (Bid Results Attached) Yes [2] No ❑ (Ratings Attached) Yes ❑No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes F,-/] No ❑ If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Date Award Posted: September 2,2025 7 day protest period ends: September 9,2025 VI. CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION PW License N/A Expiration Date: N/A Corporation Status Active Insurance Certificates Received(Date): 9/5/2025 Expiration Date: 12/31/2025 Rating: A Payment and Performance Bonds Received(Date): Not Required Rating: N/A Builders Risk Ins.Req'd: Yes ❑ No 0 If yes,has policy been purchased? (Only applicabale for projects above$1,000,000) VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) Reason Consultant Selected ❑ 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply ❑ Quality of work ❑ On Budget ❑On Time ❑ Accuracy of Construction Est ❑ 2 Qualified Personnel ❑ 3 Availability of personnel ❑ 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Enter Supervisor Name Date Approve Vill. AWARD INFORMATION Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: September 9,2025 Approval Date September 16,2025 By: City Council Purchase Order NO.: TBD Date Issued: TBD WH5 submitted N/A (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: TBD Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF POLYMER CHEMICAL FOR WASTEWATER DEPT . FY2025 -2026 PROJECT# 11617 THIS AGREEMENT FOR THE CHEMICAL PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY OF POLYMER is made this 2nd Day of September , 2025 , and entered into by and between the City of Meridian , a municipalcorporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho , hereinafter referred to as " City" , 33 East Broadway Avenue , Meridian , Idaho 83642 , Polydyne , Inc . , hereinafter referred to as " Supplier" , whose business address is 1 Chemical Plant Rd . , Riceboro , GA 31323 . INTRODUCTION WHEREAS , the City has a need for Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 per established specifications ; and WHEREAS , the Supplier is specially trained , experienced and competentto provide/supply and has agreed to supply such chemical ; NOW , THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual promises , covenants , terms and conditions hereinafter contained , the parties agree as follows : TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1 . Services , Supplies , Equipment or Chemicals Specifications & Requirements : 1 . 1 Supplier shall supply the services , supplies , equipment or chemicals to the City upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of the City ' s written notice to proceed , all items , and comply in all respects , as specified in the Invitation for Bids titled " POLYMER CHEMICAL FOR WASTEWATER DEPT . FY2025 -2026 " and Suppliers bid dated by which by this reference are incorporated herein , together with all addendums issued . 1 . 2 The Supplier shall provide all equipment and services under this Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal , state and City laws , ordinances , regulations and resolutions and the UCC . The Supplier represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this Agreement . Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 1 of 13 Project# 11617 2 . Consideration 2 . 1 The Supplier shall be compensated on a Fixed Price basis as provided in Exhibit B "Agreement Pricing Schedule" hereto and by reference made a part hereof, for the NotJo - Exceed amount of $ 1 . 38 Per Pound whereas $ 140 . 35 = 101 . 70 pounds = 11 . 689655 gallons of Polymer effectively treats 1 ton of wastewater as provided in Attachment A " Polydyne Full -Scale Trial Results " hereto and by reference made a part hereof . 2 . 2 The Supplier shall provide the City with a detailed invoice upon delivery of all services , supplies , equipment or chemicals , which the City will pay within 30 days of receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City Project Manager . The City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by City to Supplier under the terms and conditions of this Agreement . Payment of all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of Supplier . 2 . 3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement , Supplier shall not be entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration , compensation , salary , wages , or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement including , but not limited to , meals , lodging , transportation , drawings , renderings or mockups . Specifically , Supplier shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form of overtime , health insurance benefits , retirement benefits , paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever . 3 . Invoices Invoices shall be rendered in duplicate and shall include : ( 1 ) Purchase Order number ; (2 ) pricing ; ( 3 ) quantity ; (4 ) description ; ( 5 ) any sales taxes or use taxes as separate items , giving permit number authorizing collection of use taxes ; (6 ) point of shipment ; (7 ) method and class of shipment ; ( 8 ) complete routing of shipment ; and ( 9 ) whether transportation expense has been prepaid . Seller/Contractor/Contractor agrees to make a separate invoice for each order and shipment . Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Purchase Order , all taxes , duties , toils , fees , import charges , or other governmental exactions shall be deemed included in the purchase price of the supplies and services and the City shall have no liability to pay Seller/Contractor/Contractor or any third party any amount in excess of the specified purchase price . City of Meridian , a local governmental entity of the State of Idaho , is exempt from any Federal Manufacturer' s Excise Tax under the provision of Section 4221 ( a ) (4 ) of the Internal Revenue Code . All invoices shall exclude such excise tax . All invoices shall be sent to the following address : City of Meridian , Accounts Payable , 33 . East Broadway Ave . , Meridian , Idaho 83642 , Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept. FY2025-2026 Page 2 of 13 Project# 11617 4 . Term : 4 . 1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties , and shall expire upon on September 30 , 2026 or unless sooner terminated as provided below . 4 . 2 The City reserves the right to extend the agreement for up to four (4 ) additional one -year periods if mutually agreeable to both parties . Any and all extensions must be documented in writing and be executed by both parties . 4 . 3 Should Supplier default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions , City , at City ' s option , may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Supplier . 4 . 4 Should City fail to pay Supplier all or any part of the compensation set forth in Exhibit B of this Agreement on the date due , Supplier , at the Supplier' s option , may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City within thirty ( 30 ) days from the date payment is due . 5 . Termination : If, through any cause , Supplier , its officers , employees , or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement , violates any of the covenants , agreements , or stipulations of this Agreement , falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement , engages in fraud , dishonesty , or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract , or if the City determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of City , the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Supplier of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen ( 15 ) days before the effective date of such termination . Supplier may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving at least Sixty ( 60 ) Days notice to City . Notwithstanding the above , Supplier shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by Supplier , and the City may withhold any payments to Supplier for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from Supplier is determined . This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve Supplier of its liability to the City for damages . 6 . Independent Supplier : 6 . 1 In all matters pertaining to this agreement , Supplier shall be acting as an independent Supplier , and neither Supplier nor any officer , employee or agent of Supplier will be deemed an employee of City . Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A , Supplier has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to bind Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 3 of 13 Project# 11617 or incur any obligation on behalf of the City . The selection and designation of the personnel of the City in the performance of this agreement shall be made by the City . 6 . 2 Supplier , its agents , officers , and employees are and at all times during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent Suppliers and not as employees of the City . 6 . 3 Supplier shall determine the method , details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Supplier under this Agreement . Supplier shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and , except as expressly provided in this Agreement , shall not be subjected to City' s control with respect to the physical action or activities of Supplier in fulfillment of this Agreement . If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Supplier , such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Supplier . 7 . Indemnification and Insurance : a . Supplier shall indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for any and all losses , claims , actions , judgments for damages , or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorneys fees , arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Supplier, its servants , agents , officers , employees , guests , and business invitees , and not caused by or arising out of the tortuous conduct of City or its employees . Supplier shall maintain , and specifically agrees that it will maintain , throughout the term of this Agreement , liability insurance , in which the City shall be named an additional insured , except Workers Compensation Insurance , in the minimum amounts as follow : General Liability One Million Dollars ($ 1 , 000 , 000 ) per incident or occurrence , Automobile Liability Insurance One Million Dollars ($ 1 , 000 , 000 ) per incident or occurrence and Workers ' Compensation Insurance , in the statutory limits as required by law . The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City ; and if City becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits , herein provided , Supplier covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for all such losses , claims , actions , or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and other costs , including litigation costs and attorneys ' fees , arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Supplier or Supplier' s officers , employs , agents , representatives or sub - suppliers and resulting in or attributable to personal injury , death , or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property , including use of. Supplier shall provide City with a Certificate of Insurance , or other proof of insurance evidencing Supplier's compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the City at least ten ( 10 ) days prior to the date Supplier begins performance of its obligations under this Agreement . In the event the insurance minimums are changed , Supplier shall Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 4 of 13 Project# 11617 immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits . Evidence of all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to Meridian City Accounting , 33 East Broadway Avenue , Meridian , Idaho 83642 . 7 . 2 Any deductibles , self- insured retention , or named insureds must be declared in writing to the City . 7 . 3 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract , Supplier' s Insurance coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City ' s elected officers , officials , employees and volunteers . Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City or the City ' s elected officers , officials , employees and volunteers shall be excess of the Supplier' s insurance and shall not contribute with Supplier' s insurance except as to the extent of City ' s negligence . b . The Supplier' s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought , except with respect to the limits of the insurer' s liability . 7 . 4 All insurance coverages for Suppliers subs shall be subject to all of the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein . 7 . 5 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Supplier and Supplier' s agents , representatives , employees or subcontractors . 7 . 6 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Contractor and Contractor' s agents , representatives , employees or subcontractors . 9 . Warranty : In addition to any warranty required in the specifications , all equipment , coatings , valves , controls , and other components provided under this agreement shall be guaranteed for two (2 ) years against defects in workmanship and materials from the notice of acceptance . 10 . Notices : Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto , unless otherwise stated in this agreement , shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail , certified , return receipt requested , addressed as follows : CI_ SUPPLIER : City of Meridian Polydyne , Inc . Procurement Manager Attn : Boyd Stanley / Charles Scott 33 E Broadway Ave . 1 Chemical Plant Rd . Meridian , ID 83642 Riceboro , GA 31323 Ph . (208 ) 489 -0417 Phone : 800-848J659 / 360-931 -5566 Email : stanley@polydyneinc . com charless@polydyneinc . com Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 5 of 13 Project# 11617 Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided . 11 . Attorney Fees : Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement , the prevailing party shall be entitled , in addition to any other relief as may be granted , to court costs and reasonable attorneys ' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction . This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default , termination or forfeiture of this Agreement . 12 . Time is of the Essence : The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term , condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under , this Agreement by the party so failing to perform . 13 . Assignment : It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto , that Supplier shall not have the right to assign , transfer , hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of City . 14 . Discrimination Prohibited : In performing the Work required herein , Supplier shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal , state or local law , rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race , color , religion , sex , national origin or ancestry , age or disability . 15 . Reports and Information : 15 . 1 At such times and in such forms as the City may require , there shall be furnished to the City such statements , records , reports , data and information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement . 15 . 2 Supplier shall maintain all writings , documents and records prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of four (4 ) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement . This includes any handwriting , typewriting , printing , photo static , photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing , any form of communication or representation including letters , words , pictures , sounds or symbols or any combination thereof. 16 . Audits and Inspections : Subject to applicable laws respecting the protection of privacy and the City ' s requirement to comply with the Idaho Public Records Act , at any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary , there shall be made available to the City for examination all of Supplier' s records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement . Supplier shall permit the City to audit , examine , and make excerpts or transcripts from such records , and to make audits of all Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 6 of 13 Project# 11617 contracts , invoices , materials , payrolls , records of personnel , conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement . 17 . Publication , Reproduction and Use of Material : No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country . The City shall have unrestricted authority to publish , disclose and otherwise use , in whole or in part , any reports , data or other materials prepared under this Agreement . 18 . Compliance with Laws : In performing the scope of work required hereunder , Supplier shall comply with all applicable laws , ordinances , and codes of Federal , State , and local governments . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordancewith the laws of the State of Idaho , and the ordinances of the City of Meridian . Certifications . Pursuant to Idaho Code § § 67 -2359 and 67 -2346 , Contractor hereby certifies : A . That Supplier is not currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not , for the duration of this Contract , be owned or operated by the government of China . B . That Supplier is not currently engaged in , and will not for the duration of the Contract engage in , a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control . C . Supplier certifies that : ( 1 ) as of the Effective Date , it is not engaged in a " Boycott , " as defined in Idaho Code § 67-2347A , of any individual or company because that individual or company engages in or supports ( a ) the exploration , production , utilization , transportation , sale , or manufacture of fossil fuekbased energy , timber , minerals , hydroelectric power , nuclear energy , or agriculture , or ( b ) the manufacture , distribution , sale , or use of any " Firearm , " as defined in Idaho Code § 18 - 3302 (2 ) (d ) ; and ( ii ) it will not engage in any such boycott during the Term . 19 . Changes : The City may , from time to time , request changes in the Scope of Work to be performed hereunder . Such changes , including any increase or decrease in the amount of Supplier' s compensation , which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and Supplier, shall be incorporated in Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 7 of 13 Project# 11617 written amendments which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement . 20 . Construction and Severability : If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable , such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion . 21 . Waiver of Default : Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default . Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach , and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided above . 22 . Advice of Attorney : Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement . It has received independent legal advice from its attorney ' s or the opportunity to seek such advice . 23 . Entire Agreement : This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings , oral of written , whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith . 24 . Order of Precedence : The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement , the Invitation for Bid document , then the winning bidders submitted bid document . 25 . Applicable Law : This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho , and the ordinances of the City of Meridian . 26 . Approval Required : This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian . CITY OF MERIDIAN : POLYFNE , NC . . By : By : Keith Watts , Procurement Manager BOY STANL r . Vice Presiden Dated : Dated : 9/4/2 25 Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025 -2026 Page 8 of 13 Project# 11617 EXHIBIT A SUPPLY SPECIFICATIONS & REQUIREMENTS SCOPE OF WORK The City of Meridian referred to herein as the City , will accept bids for a one -year supply ( extendable for up to five additional years ) of liquid emulsion polymer that will be used to condition municipal wastewater sludge for dewatering in an Andritz D5LC30CHP High Solids Decanter Centrifuge . The polymer vendor awarded the Contract is referred to herein as the Bidder. Polymer furnished shall meet the specified terms and conditions herein : Power a . The polymer shall be the following , or an approved equal in quality and performance : Minimum Sludge Cake Solids : 17 . 0 % Minimum Solids Recovery : 98 . 5 % Note : Centrate Total Suspended Solids Concentration must be less than 450 mg/ L . b . The successful bidder shall demonstrate compliance with the performance requirements herein . c . Polymer must dissolve easily and completely in potable water within 10 minutes , in concentrations up to 0 . 5 % by weight . d . The polymer price shall be " per pound- polymer ' delivered . The bid price shall also include the cost of container return services . e . Polymer concentration shall not be less than 33 % . The bid must also contain the weight of polymer per US gallon . This information will be used to calculate cost based on liquid quantity of polymer . Delivery of Polymer f . Polymer shall be delivered by the Bidder to the City of Meridian Wastewater Treatment Facility : 3401 N Ten Mile Road , Meridian , Idaho 83646 . All shipping and delivery charges shall be paid by the Bidder and shall be included in the bid price . The City of Meridian intends to place orders on a bi -monthly basis . It is estimated that each order will be enough to achieve approximately 350 dry tons of bosolids . Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 9 of 13 Project# 11617 g . The bid shall be based on shipments of approximately IBC Totes- Bin . The estimated annual amount of polymer required is 220 , 000 pounds estimated to be equivalent to the amount needed to achieve 1 , 500 to 1 , 800 dry tons of biosolids annually or per year . h . In no event shall polymer delivery take longer than five business days from the winning bidder' s receipt of the City ' s polymer order . i . Deliveries shall be made between 7 : 00 a . m . and 5 : 00 p . m . , Monday through Friday , excluding holidays . j . The winning bidder shall provide assistance in optimizing the settings on the City ' s polymer blending /mixing units when required . The bid prices shall include the cost of up to three evaluations at the City ' s treatment plant during the year . k . The winning bidder shall promptly provide personnel necessary to assist in the proper application of their product . I . The prices in the winning bidder' s bid shall be fixed for each twelve -month term of the Contract . m . Polymer shall perform as stated in the Invitation for Bid during the entire term of the Contract and failure to comply will be just cause for City' s termination of the Contract . n . Substitute products will not be allowed unless they can be demonstrated to perform as equal to or better than the specified polymers , before delivery and accepted by the City , at the specified performance requirements , for the same or lower real cost . o . Due to the large number of polymers available and the complexity of applications , the City reserves the right to purchase test quantities of polymer to continue testing ( beyond the full -scale test ) for the most economical application and delay award until a clear winner is determined . p . The City reserves the right to discontinue the use of the dewatering centrifuge ( and associated polymer purchase ) and to employ alternate methods of sludge conditioning , dewatering , and/or disposal . q . The City reserves the right to purchase an alternate polymer from the winning bidder; should an alternate polymer better meet the City' s needs . r . It is the Bidder' s responsibility to visit the site and conduct on -site ( bench -scale ) testing of products to select the best product for evaluation . The Bidder will also be responsible for knowing the type of polymer make -up equipment at the site to ensure their product is compatible with the existing feed equipment . Each vendor will be allowed one day of bench testing at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP ) prior to full -scale trials . Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 10 of 13 Project# 11617 Contact the WW Superintendent (Warren Hudson ) by email to arrange for bench testing at whudson@merldiancity . org . All bench -scale testing will begin on July 21 , 2025 , and must be completed by August 1 , 2025 . Vendors will be responsible for providing their own bench test equipment and staff. City will only provide sludge for testing . s . After the bid opening the City will contact bidders to arrange for the full -scale testing of the proposed polymers . The Bidder will supply , at no charge to the City , a one -day supply ( 8 hours of run -time ) of polymer to treat approximately 60 , 000 gallons of sludge for a full -scale performance evaluation . The polymer supplied for full -scale testing must be the polymer that is used in determining the bid price . Full-scale testing will begin on August 6 , 2025 , and conclude by August 15 , 2025 . It is the responsibility of all Bidders submitting bids to have products on -site for testing purposes no later than 4 : 30 pm on August 4 , 2025 . Any product received after this date may not be considered . Bidders will be allowed one day ( no more than 8 hours ) to set up and test their polymer during full -scale operation . No adjustments will be allowed to the Centrifuge ether than the polymer dose during the set-up/testing period . Following the maximum 8 -hour set -up/testing period , or when the bidder declares they are ready, full - scale evaluation shall begin (this may be the next day) . The centrifuge shall be started in automatic mode and ran for a period of not less than three hours . Clty staff will measure polymer usage and centrifuge performance hourly for at least three hours . During the evaluation period , NO adjustments to any equipment will be allowed . Any adjustments to any equipment during this period may be deemed immediate grounds for dismissal of the product . Only products that meet or exceed the minimum requirements set forth in this document , as demonstrated in the full -scale performance evaluations and specified herein , will be considered for award . Due to the time , it will take to complete the full- scale testing , the award of the supply contract may not occur until 4 -6 weeks after bid opening . t . By submitting a product for testing , the Bidder acknowledges that it is able to supply this product , at the same performance quality and manufacturing specifications , at the volume necessary to fulfill the terms/length of the annual contract . Lab samples will be checked against future deliveries of product to ensure performance - based standards . The Bidder will be required to produce , at the City ' s request , retained samples of product batches delivered . An SDS sheet must accompany each shipment and a certificate of analysis stating the total solids , bulk viscosity , and dilute viscosity . The City reserves the right to conduct lab analysis on each load delivered to verify the certificate of analysis . u . In the event the Bidder discontinues manufacturing the product supplied , or changes the manufacturing process , it is the Bidder' s responsibility to inform the City of these Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 11 of 13 Project# 11617 changes and to supply , at no additional cost to the City , a product with equal or superior performance than the product previously supplied at no more than the annual contract price . v . In the event of a drop in performance without a notification of change by the Bidder and with no significant changes in plant process , the sludge/polymer interaction will be documented and compared with the original sludge/ polymer interaction . It will be the Bidder' s responsibility to remove any polymer whose performance or specifications are deemed substandard by the City . Failure to do so may result in termination of the annual contract . Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 12 of 13 Project# 11617 EXHIBIT B AGREEMENT ENT PRICING SCHEDULE Agreement includes the supply/delivery of Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept FY2025-2026 including any incidentals as required for this chemical . NOT -TO - EXCEED AMOUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1 . 38 Per Pound Agreement is a not to exceed amount . Line item pricing below will be used for invoice verification and any additional increases or decreases in work requested by City. The City will pay the Supplier based on actual quantities of each item of work in accordance with the agreement documents . Estimated Item No . Description Quantity UOM Price/Lb 1 Polymer Chemical 220 , 000 LB $ 1 . 38 > > Treatment Doseage : $ 101 . 70 pounds = 11 . 689655 gallons of Polymer effectively treats 1 ton of wastewater . Polymer Chemical For Wastewater Dept . FY2025-2026 Page 13 of 13 Project# 11617 ATTACHMENT A E LIQUID EMULSION POLYMER FULL SCALE TE�[ 1 ' G ;ra . VLP-1FY t r.tc tp Company : /� ' �- '� � YN £ Price per pound of polymer: l4 3 a ' NS Pounds per gallon : Representative Present ? : Y N Date of test . ?' / S Representative Name : ar � d 3 Signature : DRAWDO `VN READINGS An average of 3 drawdown readings will be used to determine the number of pounds of polymer required to achieve 1 ton of dry biosolids . The following calculations were used to determine the time it takes to treat I ton of biosolids : 1 % Solids = 10 . 000 ppm ; °�a Solids = 1 . 500 = 15 , 000 ppm ; Centrifuge = t00 gprn ( Flow ) ( 15 , 000 ppm ) ( 8 . 34 lbs 'gal ) _ 2 , 000 lbs ; Flow - 0 . 016 MGD = 16 , 000 gals day ; 16 , 000 gal / day 100 gal/ min - 160 minutes to treat 1 ton of biosolids . Drawdown readings will be taken at 1 hour, ? hours , and 3 hours after start of the testing . The readings will be taken using a 1000 nil-. calibration column . Drawdown time will be 1 minute . Test start time : Verification of' settin 1h2ht' 7 3hr HOUR I : Initial Colutttn heading : mL /min ... ,, 0 Polymer flow rate - Final - Initial = �" V mL/min Final Column Reading : x0 `� mi-. httin o Polymer flow rate : l `Z5{� till . min x 160 min . - klv mL 3785 . 41 gal ' mL = f i � �f� gallons b3 gallons x '8%wiJ b5 ' gallon = —" _ lbs of polymer HOUR 2 ; Initial Column Reading : mLrmin Polymer flow rate = Final - Initial:-- 2e niLitnin Final Column Reading : niLimin Polymer flow rate : mVniin x 160 rain . - y OO n1L 3785 , 41 gal tnL = 11 , 93 gallons . ... gallons x vlbs !gallon = lbs of polymer Cy HOUR 31 Initial Column Reading : _ nil . / min �f Polymer flow rate - Final — Initial = nil . / min Final Column Reading : C� ` mL-` min Polymer flow rate : _ _ mL / min x 160 thin . - N3200 mL 3785 .41 gal / mL = ! a' � gallons - 1 _ gallons x `albs/gallon = _ _ �66 lbs of polymer u7 ©� � o / Vo. 3s Average pounds of polymer used : (lbs ) x $ t . ($/Ib) = $ to treat 1 ton fIERIIDnIAN40=� LIQUID EMULSION POLYMER -- BID FULL SCALE TESTING Company : r 4'L Y D�V N Price per pound of polymer : / , 3� Pounds per gallon : LAB SAN'IPLE RESULTS Cake and centrate samples will be taken at 1 hour, 2 hours , and 3 hours after the start of the testing . Samples will be analyzed for sludge cake percent total solids and centrate TSS . The average of each analysis will be taken and must meet the following : Minimum Sludge Cake "l ' otal Solids : 17 "� � K C Z Maximum Centrate TSS : , `�`- HOUR 1 : t c7 er Sludge Cake °o "l"otal Solids : aCentrate TSS : HOUR 2 : Sludge Cake: ' Cotal Solids : _ - 010 0 ) 1 y Centrate TSS : J (mg 'L ) HOUR 3 : �pd Sludge Cake ° o Total Solids : Centrate TSS : _ ( mg /L ) AVERAGE SLUDGE CAKE TOTAL SOLIDS : AVERAGE CENTRATE TSS : S� ( mg/L) Meets requirements? Y N City of Meridian Representatives Dwec WL.SyWiL(q. Signature : _ * Lab test retiults will be available 24 hours after completion of full scale testing . Results of tests will be kept confidential from other bidders until all bidders have completed full scale testing , v IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Amended Emergency Management Joint Powers Agreement Between City of Meridian and Ada County, Ada County Highway District, City of Boise, City of Eagle, City of Garden City, City of Kuna, and City of Star AGREEMENT NO. 10878-5-25 AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT THIS RENEWED AND AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT is effective on 16 September , 2025, by and between Ada County, a body politic and corporate whose address is 200 W. Front St., Boise, Idaho 83702 ("Ada County"); Ada County Highway District, a single county-wide highway district created pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 40-1401 et seq., whose address is 3775 Adams St., Garden City, Idaho 83714 ("ACHD"); City of Boise, a municipal corporation whose address is 150 N. Capitol Blvd., Boise, Idaho 83702 ("Boise"); City of Eagle, a municipal corporation whose address is 660 E. Civic Ln., Eagle, Idaho 83616 ("Eagle"); City of Garden City, a municipal corporation whose address is 6015 Glenwood, Garden City, Idaho 83714 ("Garden City"); City of Kuna, a municipal corporation whose address is 751 W. 4th St., Kuna, Idaho 83634 ("Kuna"); City of Meridian, a municipal corporation whose address is 33 E. Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642 ("Meridian"); and the City of Star, a municipal corporation whose address is 10769 W. State Street, Star, Idaho 83669 ("Star") (collectively referred to herein as the "Participants"). RECITALS: A. Ada County is authorized by Idaho Code § 46-1009 to create an intergovernmental agency responsible for disaster preparedness and coordination of response, and, for that purpose, pursuant to this Agreement, Ada County has established the Ada County Emergency Management and Community Resilience (EMCR), which is a separate and independent department under the administration of Ada County. B. The Participants desire to build and sustain regional core emergency management capabilities by implementing strategies to address identified planning, organization, equipment,training, and exercise needs to prevent,protect against,respond to, and recover from natural, technical and other catastrophic events. C. The Participants understand that emergency preparedness is not exclusive to any single level of government or organization,but is best served by the combined efforts of the whole community. As such, the Participants desire to partner with and obtain advice and input from each other on emergency management priorities, activities and funding, including, but not limited to resource allocations before, during and after disasters. The Participants also recognize the need for a forum for the technical aspects of expenditures to be researched, discussed,planned, and prioritized. D. It is the desire of the Participants to adopt this Joint Powers Agreement to create the Ada City-County Emergency Management Executive Council ("ACCEM") to provide for emergency management programs and systems and to address areas of technology, research, planning and prioritization of projects involving the use of emergency management resources including, but not limited to federal grants. AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 1 E. All Participants will retain control over those matters not related to ACCEM or this Agreement,which retained control,may include,but is not limited to: budgeting personnel decisions, equipment, offices,payroll, day-to-day operations and other related matters not impairing the operation or functioning of ACCEM. F. The Participants understand and agree,pursuant to Idaho Code § 46-1025,that federal and state grants and funds awarded through the Idaho Department of Homeland Security are distributed directly to counties for the purpose of assisting counties in achieving the goals and objectives outlined in approved county grant proposals. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Participants covenant and agree as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is for the Participants to jointly identify,plan for, and assess hazards and risks affecting residents of all of Ada County, including all of the geographical areas governed by each of the Participants;to guide future preparedness efforts across all mission areas; and to set priorities for development of regional core emergency management capabilities. 2. Ada City-County Emergency Management Executive Council. There is hereby created ACCEM. 2.1 Membership. The members of ACCEM shall be comprised of one representative from each Participant. The representative shall be an elected official from each Participant, including the mayor of each incorporated city, the chairperson of the Ada County Board of Commissioners and the President of the ACHD Board of Commissioners. There shall be one additional representative each from Ada County and Boise City. The additional representative from Ada County shall be an Ada County Commissioner appointed by a resolution of the Ada County Board of County Commissioners. The additional representative from Boise City shall be a Boise City Councilperson appointed by a resolution of the Boise City Council. These two additional representatives shall serve at the pleasure of the body that appointed such representative. Each Participant's representative may designate in writing one alternate elected official to serve in his or her absence with the full authority to act on his or her behalf in all matters before ACCEM. 2.2 Duties of ACCEM. ACCEM shall perform all actions reasonably necessary to fulfill the responsibilities and obligations existing pursuant to Idaho Code § 46-1009. These duties shall include,but are not limited to: • 2.2.1 Considering policy implications and determining future preparedness priorities across all mission areas related to identified hazards and risks affecting residents of Ada County; AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 2 • 2.2.2 Facilitating interactions among ACEM, the Technical Advisory Group ("TAG"), the Local Emergency Planning Committee ("LEPC"), and all whole community stakeholders to create and validate plans, policies and procedures governing emergency management and identifying core capability needs through discussion and operations-based activities; • 2.2.3 Facilitating sharing of specialized resources such as supplies, equipment, facilities, and personnel with any Participant, or their various public or private sector partners with emergency management missions, through maintaining resource inventories and sharing agreements and allowing use of grant purchased equipment in support of emergency management functions, consistent with existing and future mutual aid or resource sharing agreements; • 2.2.4 Enhancing emergency management coordination and communication between government agencies,businesses and industry, and volunteer agencies for both preparedness efforts and operational activities; • 2.2.5 Promoting disaster recovery through a focus on the timely restoration, strengthening, and revitalization of infrastructure, housing, and a sustainable economy, as well as the health, social, cultural, historic, and environmental fabric of Ada County; • 2.2.6 Supporting an environment of coordinated and integrated all-hazards comprehensive countywide emergency management activities that include joint planning, training, equipping, exercising, and evaluation of capabilities; • 2.2.7 Providing qualified individuals from within their jurisdictions to serve as members of ACCEM committees; • 2.2.8 Supporting inter-governmental plans that address roles and responsibilities for all phases of emergency management, and after consultation with the TAG and LEPC, making a recommendation to Participants that such be adopted; • 2.2.9 After consultation with the TAG and the LEPC, make determinations regarding spending priorities for county-wide emergency management; • 2.2.10 Approving and submitting a budget to the Board for the Membership Contributions submitted by Participants for deposit in the Emergency Management Fund. 2.3 Bylaws. ACCEM shall have the power and authority to make such bylaws as may be necessary to its operation. 2.4 Committees. ACCEM may create such committees as may be necessary to its operation; provided however, that there shall be created a Technical Advisory Group ("TAG") and a Local Emergency Planning Committee ("LEPC") with such bylaws AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 3 provided therefore as may be necessary for their operation. 2.5 Grant Funds. The Participants understand and agree that grant funds for emergency management are provided to the County by the State of Idaho and that the Board has oversight over the expenditure of the grant funds. The Participants further understand and agree that county-wide emergency management requires cooperation and meaningful review by all Participants to ensure that the use and expenditure of grant funds are applied beneficially for all Participants. ACCEM, upon receipt and review of recommendations from the TAG and/or LEPC, shall make recommendations to the Board regarding the use and expenditure of all grant funds received by the County from the Idaho Office of Emergency Management. The Board shall follow the recommendations of ACCEM to the maximum extent possible and shall report back to ACCEM those instances when the recommendations are not followed along with a statement as to the reasons therefore. All Participants shall sign such sub-grant agreements and liability waivers as are reasonably requested by Ada County for the purposes of receiving grants funds. To the extent available, Participants may continue to apply for grants for which they qualify on an individual basis. 3. Ada County Department of Emergency Management and Community Resilience (EMCR).EMCR shall operate as a separate and independent Department under the administration of the Board. The primary mission of ACCEM shall be to coordinate and integrate an all-hazard, comprehensive, county-wide emergency management program on behalf of all Participants to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from the threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk to the citizens and residents of Ada County. 3.1 Director of EMCR and Community Resilience. The Director of EMCR (the "Director") shall be employed by Ada County; provided, however, that the Board shall consult with ACCEM regarding all employment decisions the Board makes regarding the Director, including, but not limited to, hiring, termination, and discipline. Should the Director resign or be terminated, the Board shall appoint an interim Director to discharge all the duties and exercise all the powers of the Director until the selection of a permanent Director is made in consultation with ACCEM. 3.2 Director's Duties. The Director shall be an ex officio, non-voting member of ACCEM, shall attend all meetings of ACCEM, and shall perform such duties for ACCEM as may be established by this Agreement and the Bylaws and as otherwise assigned by ACCEM. 3.3 EMCR Employees. Ada County shall employ such EMCR staff members payable out of the Emergency Management Fund as approved in its annual ACCEM budget and shall be responsible for the payment of all staff wages, payroll taxes, fringe benefits and other costs. Upon request,Ada County may provide the services of EMCR employees to other Participants for the purpose of developing regional core emergency management capabilities. 3.4 Books and Records. Ada County shall maintain in compliance with Idaho AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 4 Code, books and records for the Emergency Management Fund which shall be available for inspection and review by ACCEM at any time during business hours. 3.5 Fiscal Year.The fiscal or business year of the Board, Council and EMCR shall begin on the first day of October and end on the last day of September. 3.6 Budget. The Director shall present a preliminary budget and proposed membership contributions to ACCEM for consideration and for subsequent incorporation into each Participant's budgeting processes. A final budget will be presented to ACCEM for approval no later than the 1st day of August of each fiscal year. ACCEM shall submit a final recommended budget to the Board no later than August 15t' of each fiscal year. 4. Emergency Management Fund. There shall be deposited into the Emergency Management Fund such property taxes, grants (as modified by section 4.2 below), Membership Contributions, and such other funds as may be obtained by Ada County or donated to it for the purposes set forth in Idaho Code § 46-1009 and such expenses shall be allowed as may be appropriated in the annual budget for the Emergency Management Fund. 4.1 Membership Contributions. Each Participant shall pay annual membership contributions in accordance with the terms contained herein to contribute towards funding the ACCEM program ("Membership Contributions"). Payment (or non-payment) of these funds by a participating municipality is not intended to enable or limit that municipality's ability to access EMCR services (i.e., planning, organizing, training, equipping, and exercising). Contributions are intended to provide members with voting privileges and access to discussions where emergency management priorities are set for Ada County. Membership contributions for Ada County are determined based on each member jurisdiction's respective percentage of total County population. Each year, EMCR shall submit its personnel and operating budget to the ACCEM Executive Council for approval. ACCEM uses that approved budget to determine the contributions for each member. For purposes of calculating Membership Contributions,the number of residents located within Ada County and each respective city shall be determined annually by ACCEM using the most current population estimates available to ACCEM. Membership contributions payable by Ada County shall include all of the residents inside the geographical borders of Ada County(including cities)plus the number of residents in unincorporated Ada County. Membership contributions payable by cities shall be based on the number of residents in each city,with all members also agreeing on the contribution levels payable by Ada County Highway District determined each year based on factors such as community growth and EMCR operational costs. Membership Contributions shall be due and payable to the Emergency Management Fund in equal installments on a quarterly basis. However, members can provide contributions in advance of the quarterly requirement or in its entirety each year. Membership Contributions may be adjusted annually by ACCEM. 4.2 Grants. Consistent with Section 2.5,Ada County shall apply for grants to fund emergency management capabilities, personnel and operations. Such portions of grants received by Ada County which shall be awarded to fund the programs, personnel and operations of the ACCEM shall be deposited to the Emergency Management Fund. AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 5 Expenses. Consistent with the approved budget, the costs and expenses incurred by Ada County to house, employ staff, and operate the ACCEM program may be assessed against the Emergency Management Fund as any other business expense. 5. Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall be from the date of signing to September 30 of next ensuing year. Each Participant may, solely at its option, and when and if it duly budgets and appropriates funds therefore from revenues legally available to it for the ensuing fiscal year, renew this Agreement for additional annual Renewal Terms. Each annual renewal of this Agreement shall be deemed to be exercised by the Participant upon the adoption by September 15 of any year,of a budget of the ensuing fiscal year,duly budgeting and appropriating the amount of money required to make the payments payable for the next fiscal year by the Participant pursuant to this Agreement. Within ten (10) days following the adoption of a budget duly budgeting and appropriating said funds of the ensuing year, the approving Participant shall deliver to the Chairman of the Board a written statement certifying that it has duly budgeted and appropriated said funds for the ensuing year, which written statement shall be accompanied by a copy of the budget so adopted and a certified copy of the resolution or other official action of the Participant's governing board adopting said budget and appropriating said funds.The due appropriation of funds as aforesaid shall constitute a valid and enforceable obligation of the Participant for the payment of such funds for the purposes provided herein,and shall not be subject to abatement for any cause. Each Renewal Term shall commence on October 1 of the fiscal year following adoption of the budget as provided hereinabove and shall terminate on September 30 of the following calendar year. 6. Withdrawal or Termination. Any Participant may withdraw from this joint powers agreement at any time by resolution duly adopted by the Participant and upon written notice to ACCEM; provided, however, no party shall be entitled to a refund of its Membership Contributions which have been paid. Upon such withdrawal,the withdrawing party shall no longer be entitled to be a member of ACCEM and may not receive all of ACCEM's benefits or services. In addition, ACCEM, upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of its representatives, may terminate any party to this agreement for failure to pay its Membership Contributions within thirty (30) days of written demand for such contributions. 7. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed and duly authorized by resolution of each Participant. 8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and once so executed by all parties thereto, each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original instrument but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one agreement. 9. Recitals and Exhibits. The recitals to this Agreement and any exhibit attached hereto are incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full herein. AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed effective as of the day and year first above written. ADA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Dated: Chair ATTEST: Ada County Clerk ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT By: Dated: President ATTEST: Clerk CITY OF BOISE By: Dated: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 7 CITY OF EAGLE By: Dated: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF GARDEN CITY By: Dated: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CITY OF KUNA By: Dated: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN By: Dated: 9-16-2025 By Luke Cavener, Council President ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 9-16-2025 CITY OF STAR By: Dated: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk AMENDED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT—PAGE 9 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Addendum No. 23 to Agreement for City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services Between the City of Meridian and the City of Boise ADDENDUM NO. 23 TO AGREEMENT FOR CITY PROSECUTOR/CRIMINAL LEGAL SERVICES DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2002 THIS ADDENDUM No. 23 is entered into this 16th day of _September 2025, by and between the City of Meridian (hereinafter "Meridian") and the City of Boise (hereinafter "Boise") to amend and extend the Agreement for City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services dated November 1,2002 ("Agreement"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on November 1, 2002, Meridian and Boise entered into the Agreement for Boise to provide certain legal services to Meridian;and WHEREAS, the Agreement was extended and modified by Addendums approved in fiscal years 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015,2016, 2017,2018, 2019, 2020,2021,2022,2023,2024, and 2025; and WHEREAS, Meridian and Boise desire to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional one(1) year term,and modify terms of the Agreement regarding payment; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Meridian and Boise agree to amend the Agreement as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby modified to read as follows: 4. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES. Meridian agrees to pay Boise for the services rendered pursuant to the terms of this Agreement as follows: 4.1.As compensation for all Primary Legal Services,including out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Boise in performing the Primary Legal Services, Meridian shall pay Boise the total sum of eight hundred twenty nine thousand three hundred seventy-four dollars and forty nine cents ($829,374.49) annually, in monthly installments of sixty-nine thousand one hundred fourteen dollars and fifty four cents($69,114.54). 4.2.Meridian shall pay monthly installments for Primary Legal Services on or before the 20th day of the month following the provision of such services. 4.3.In the event, and upon Meridian's request, Boise provides legal services beyond the Primary Legal Services set forth in this Agreement, Boise shall provide Meridian with a monthly itemized invoice for such services. Provided Meridian receives the invoice by the 5th of the month, Meridian shall remit payment to Boise on or before the first business day of the following month. 2. In accordance with Section 9 of the Agreement, Section 5 of the Agreement is amended as follows: TERM. The term of this Agreement is renewed and extended to continue to September 30, Meridian Addendum No. 22 Page 1 2026, the end of Meridian's FY26 fiscal year, subject to renewal or extension as set forth in this Agreement. 3. Except as modified by this Addendum No. 23, the original Agreement for the City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services between the City of Meridian and the City of Boise dated November 1, 2002, which incorporates Addendums Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 shall remain in full force and effect. IT IS SO AGREED. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Addendum No. 21 on this day of September 2025. CITY OF MERIDIAN BY: Mayor Robert Simison ATTEST: BY: Chris Johnson, City Clerk CITY OF BOISE BY: NO Mayor Lauren McLean /C�q Zp2,� ATTEST: Jamie Heinzerling,Cit Clerk ��g1�Zs Meridian Addendum No. 23 Page 2 BOISE CITY ATTORNEY Proposal: City of Meridian Prosecution Services for FY2026 ` B O I S E C 7 T'i 0 F T R E E S PROPOSAL FOR FY2026 PROSECUTION SERVICES SCOPE OF SERVICES The Boise City Attorney's Office proposes the following scope of services in FY2026. These services remain the same as those identified in the FY2025 Addendum to the 2002 Agreement for City Prosecutor/Criminal Legal Services: • Prosecutorial screening of police-generated misdemeanor reports and citations routed for review. • Timely filing decisions and notification to Meridian Police Department upon request. • Prosecution of infractions and misdemeanors occurring within Meridian City limits or pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding between the Meridian Police Department and the Boise Police Department. • Coverage of additional caseloads in any new criminal courtrooms assigned by the Trial Court Administrator. • Access to the On-Call Warrant Team for procurement of arrestor search warrants 24 hours a day, seven days a week. • Legal training for Block Training, Advanced Academy, and POST, as mutually agreed upon. • Regular (generally monthly) case law updates including Idaho, Ninth Circuit, and U.S. Supreme Court. CITY of BOISE CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE Proposed FY2026 Contract Amount From FY2019 through FY2024, the parties operated under an agreement increasing the contract payment by a fixed amount of $70,481 .00 each year. That agreement's goal was to balance the City of Boise's need to ensure full recoupment of costs incurred in providing prosecution services to the City of Meridian, and the City of Meridian's desire for a reasonable and predictable increase in annual expenses. For FY2025, the parties agreed to a contract increase of 3.2%, which was based upon the Social Security Administration's cost of living increase. With the same goals of reasonableness, predictability, and cost recoupment in mind, the Boise City Attorney's Office has determined that it can provide the services identified above in FY2026 for a contract increase of 2.5%, which is equal to the Social Security Administration's cost of living increase for 2025. In light of this, the City Attorney's Office proposes a contract amount of $829,374.49 ($69,1 14.54 per month)* for FY2026. The Office is able to offer this lower percentage increase due in part to the continued success of its case management system, as well as a strong cadre of attorneys and support staff. *There is a slight discrepancy in the numbers due to rounding of the monthly payment amount. CITYof BOISE CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE RECAP OF SERVICES PROVIDED IN CALENDAR YEAR 2024 AND TO DATE IN 2025 CASES INCOMING SEVERITY 2024 2025 TO DATE Felony 4 Misdemeanor 3077 707 Infraction 1561 334 Total 4,642 1,041 CHARGES CHARGE 2024 2025 TO DATE Alcohol Related 97 27 Crimes Against Person 442 68 DUI 375 98 Miscellaneous 317 72 Controlled Substances 556 132 Parking 446 106 Property Crimes 284 52 Traffic Infractions 989 200 Domestic Violence 314 58 Traffic Misdemeanors 597 156 Warrants 225 72 CITYof BOISE CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE CHARGE DISPOSITION DISPOSITION 2024 2025 TO DATE Plead Guilty 1491 357 Dismissed 1585 395 Declined 587 74 Dismissed with Compliance 133 22 Default Judgment 110 36 Guilty at Trial 105 7 Payment in Full 13 1 Guilty 327 110 Acquittal 18 5 No Action Required 18 6 Amended to Felony 4 7 Alford Plea 9 6 Bond Forfeiture 3 0 Declined to File 2 0 Found Not Guilty 15 4 Judgment 2 4 Dismissed without 2 0 Compliance CITYof BOISE CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE HEARINGS TYPE 2024 2025 TO DATE Pre-Trial Conference 3188 1257 Pro-Se Arraignment 1244 358 Settlement Conference 865 278 Arraignment 486 138 Court Trial 381 110 Sentence Hearing 375 154 Review Hearing 374 176 Status Conference 315 110 Probation Violation Hearing 304 76 Probable Cause - Screening 252 38 162 scheduled 65 scheduled Jury Trial 18 Went to trial 9 have gone to trial FTO - PC 153 58 Motion Hearing 144 43 Probable Cause 119 42 DUI Arraignment 118 31 FTA Court 106 32 FTO - Bond Out 92 27 No Contact Order Hearing 46 15 Hearing 28 13 BAC Hearing 27 10 DV Jury Trial 27 10 Suppression Hearing 26 4 Restitution Hearing 20 6 Contempt Hearing 19 4 Failure to Comply Hearing 7 0 Oral Argument 3 0 Mediation 2 0 CITYof BOISE CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE Other 1 0 CITYof BOISE CREATING A CITY FOR EVERYONE E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Lakeview Golf Course Fees Discussion Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: E IDIAN Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader, Vice President D A H Q Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts September 2, 2025 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison and City Council FROM: Garrett White, Recreation Superintendent Ryan Roberts, PGA, General Manager/Head Golf Professional RE: Lakeview Golf Course Fee Discussion Background Each year we review the Lakeview Golf Course fees to ensure we are meeting the expectations of Council and our community. The methodology for this year's adjustments is based on a combination of inflationary trends and competitive pricing.The target was to apply a roughly 4% increase across the board,with a few exceptions. Here are the key points: • Rounding for Simplicity:To present clean, customer-friendly pricing at the register,we have rounded all applicable fees to the nearest whole-dollar amount after the 6%tax.This results in slight variances above or below the 4%target but overall,the adjustments align with the intended inflationary increase. • Range Buckets:The small bucket will increase by$0.52 after tax and the large range bucket will increase by$0.10 after tax to hit whole-dollar amounts after tax. Lowering them would not make financial sense, so this small bump allows for consistency without undercutting our current structure. • Private Cart Trail Fee:This has been recalculated using a different method—multiplying the daily fee by 41,which is the same break-even point as the single-unlimited pass, resulting in a new pre-tax fee of$618.69 or$655.81 after tax. • Annual Passes:We are applying a 4% increase to the current fee, and the 6%tax is shown to reflect the full amount paid by the customer. • The Senior/Military rates are structured to be$5 less for all the 18-hole offerings and $3 less for all the 9-Hole offerings.This approach will make future pricing updates more efficient and consistent, especially when adjusting based on CPI, budget, staff wages, and other annual factors. Objective To have Council provide feedback on Lakeview Golf Course fees. Once feedback is given,the fees will be posted and brought back to Council for a public hearing within the next few weeks. Lakeview Golf Course Fee Type Fee Title Current Fee Proposed Fee Weekday- 18 holes $39.62 $41.51 Green Fees ($42.00 w/tax) ($44.00 w/tax) Weekday-9 holes $29.25 $31.13 Green Fees ($31.00 w/tax) ($33.00 w/tax) Weekday Senior- 18 holes $36.79 N/A Green Fees ($39.00 w/tax) Weekday Senior-9 holes $28.30 N/A Green Fees ($30.00 w/tax) Weekday Junior- 18 holes $19.81 $20.75 Green Fees ($21.00 w/tax) ($22.00 w/tax) Weekday Junior-9 holes $14.15 $15.09 Green Fees ($15.00 w/tax) ($16.00 w/tax) Twilight $35.85 $37.74 Green Fees ($38.00 w/tax) ($40.00 w/tax) Weekend- 18 holes $48.11 $50.00 Green Fees ($51.00 w/tax) ($53.00 w/tax) Weekend -9 holes $35.85 $37.74 Green Fees ($38.00 w/tax) ($40.00 w/tax) Weekend Junior- 18 holes $22.64 $23.58 Green Fees ($24.00 w/tax) ($25.00 w/tax) Weekend Junior-9 holes $16.98 $17.92 Green Fees ($18.00 w/tax) ($19.00 w/tax) Weekend Senior- 18 holes $41.51 $45.28 Green Fees ($44.00 w/tax) ($48.00 w/tax) Weekend Senior 9 holes $33.96 $34.91 Green Fees ($36.00 w/tax) ($37.00 w/tax) Twilight Weekend $44.34 $46.23 Green Fees ($47.00 w/tax) ($49.00 w/tax) Cart- 18 holes $19.00 $19.81 Green Fees ($20.14 w/tax) ($21.00 w/tax) Cart-9 holes $13.00 $14.15 Green Fees ($13.78 w/tax ($15.00 w/tax) Personal Cart Trail Fee $14.00 $15.09 Green Fees ($14.84 w/tax) ($16.00 w/tax) Range Token - Large Bucket $15.00 $15.09 Green Fees ($15.90 w/tax) ($16.00 w/tax) Range Token -Small Bucket $8.00 $8.49 Green Fees ($8.48 w/tax) ($9.00 w/tax) Club Rental- 18 holes $24.00 $24.53 Green Fees ($25.44 w/tax) ($26.00 w/tax) Club Rental-9 holes $14.00 $14.15 Green Fees ($14.84 w/tax) ($15.00 w/tax) Push Cart- 18 holes $14.00 $14.15 Green Fees ($14.84 w/tax) ($15.00 w/tax) Push Cart-9 holes $10.00 $10.38 Green Fees (10.60 w/tax) ($11.00 w/tax) Fee Type Fee Title Current Fee Proposed Fee $323.58 $618.69 Golf Pass Private Cart Trail Pass ($343.00 w/tax) ($655.81 w/tax) $558.49 $580.83 Golf Pass Resident 1/2 price (592.00 w/tax) ($615.68 w/tax) $674.53 $701.51 Golf Pass Lakeview Cart Fee ($715.00 w/tax) ($743.60 w/tax) $2,165.10 $2,251.70 Couple- Restricted (anytime on weekdays; ($2 295.00 w/tax) ($2,386.81 w/tax) Golf Pass afternoons only on weekends and holidays) $3,069.81 $3192.60 Golf Pass Couple- Unlimited ($3,254.00 w/tax) ($3,384.16 w/tax) $319.81 $332.60 Golf Pass Junior ($339.00 w/tax) ($352.56 w/tax) Senior Couple- Restricted (anytime on $2,070.75 $2153.58 weekdays; afternoons only on weekends ($2,194.47 w/tax) ($2,282.79 w/tax) Golf Pass and holidays) $2975.47 $3,094.49 Golf Pass Senior Couple- Unlimited ($3,154.00 w/tax) ($3,280.16 w/tax) Senior/Military- Restricted (anytime on $1,225.47 $1,274.49 weekdays; afternoons only on weekends ($1,299.00 w/tax) ($1,350.96 w/tax) Golf Pass and holidays) $1,894.34 $1,970.11 Golf Pass Senior/Military- Unlimited ($2,008.00 w/tax) ($2,088.32 w/tax) $1,319.81 $1,372.60 Single- Restricted (anytime on weekdays; ($1,399.00 w/tax) ($1,454.96 w/tax) Golf Pass afternoons only on weekends and holidays) $1,988.68 $2,068.23 Golf Pass Single- Unlimited ($2,108.00 w/tax) ($2,192.32 w/tax) E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Presentation and Discussion 2025 ACHD Impact Fee & Capital Ada County Highway DistrictChief of Operations + Infrastructure Justin Lucas Improvement Plan Update Traffic Project CostsDevelopmentCIP Project ReviewBest Practice 2 2025 CIP Update Project Overview TIF Schedule2025 CIP & DevelopmentImpact Fee 0 WESTEAST 3 Two Service Areas-ACHD Commission Direction Service Area DRAFT Resulting Shopping Center TIF (per KSF)N/A$18,592$11,137Resulting Office TIF (per KSF)N/A$11,329$6,786Resulting Single Family Unit TIFN/A$8,929$5,348Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs$1.64B$1.30B$ 339MTotal Project Costs$2.26B$1.78B$480MTotalService AreaWestService AreaEast 4 2025 Traffic Impact Fees Resultant Full CIP Roadway Projects 13 new roadway projects149 roadway projects (draft)5 Refined DRAFT CIP Projects 6 Timeline & Next Steps on Focus AreasCosts & Direction ) Project th July 9(& Commission ) th June 30CICAC (October 2025)(September/PeriodPublic Comment 2025 CIP & TIFDraft Fall 2025 CIP & TIFAdopt development for input.sessions to be scheduled through the CIP Additional CICAC & Commission work SummerSpringWinterSummer Project CostsIdentification & Project AnalysisPreliminary Practice Review & National Best CommissionCICAC & Report Backs to VisioningCommission CICAC & 7 TIF CALCULATION FACTORS in VMTChange FactorAdjustment Network RateGeneration Trip Peak Hour FactorTrip New LengthTrip Avg. CostsEligible -TIFImpact FeeTraffic Network Adj. Factor0.440.47Average Trip Length7.736.17yr)-Change in VMT (20327,286260,730Factor2025 CIPCurrent CIP 9 0 AreasTwo Service ZoneArea + Overlay Single Service Scenario 3Scenario 2Scenario 1 Conditions)(Current AreaSingle Service 10 Service Area Scenarios 0 11 Scenario 1: Single Service Area Service Area 0 12 datatrip length mode share + based on reduced would be land uses residential overlay for TIFs within Overlay ZoneScenario 2: Single Service Area + Service Area Service Area Considerations CICAC RecommendationImpact Fee (SFH)DRAFT Resulting Traffic $7,635$5,650–Overlay Zone $7,635–Outside Zone (County Wide) $5,406–East Service Area $8,636–West Service Area Key ConsiderationsadminLeast complex accounting and •to growth needsMaximum flexibility to respond •how fees are spentMaximum flexibility where and •for other potential future zonesRequires ACHD to establish criteria to •created by in certain areasAcknowledges unique travel patterns •Star) that this benefits themPerception from 2 agencies (Boise, •Limits flexibility for developers•complexityIncreased accounting and admin •implement projects in East Areafund loans to -Need for inter•Project ImplementationThroughout CountyFees & Projects Flexible Throughout CountyFees & Projects Flexible Separate Areas (East & West)Restricts Fees & Projects to COMPARISONCRITERIA FOR SINGLE SERVICE AREAOVERLAY ZONESINGLE SERVICE AREA + TWO SERVICE AREASc 13 ACHD CIP Draft Review and Adoption Schedule Late August / Early September • Continue partner agency outreach • Present updated project list, maps, and fee schedule September • Sept 22 — CICAC Meeting o Review Draft Report, Fee Schedule, and Revenue Projections • Sept 24 — Commission Meeting o Present Draft Report and Next Steps Key Topics: • Draft Report • Outreach Update (Commercial Developers and Home Builders) • Public Outreach Kickoff • Next Steps September/ October • Sept 25 — Public Outreach Launch o Release Draft Report, Draft Ordinance, and supporting documentation o Online public outreach tools (Project webpage, Story Map, Survey) Public Outreach Content: • Story Map (FAQ and Service Areas) • Draft IF Ordinance (with attachments) • Draft CIP (with attachments) October • Oct 9 — Close of Public Outreach • Oct 13-23 — Compile Public Comments November • Nov 5 — Commission Pre-Adoption Work Session • Nov 13 — Public Hearing Notice Period Begins December • Dec 3 — Commission Adoption Hearing -- nent A PROJECT MAP a e J m `fGre Ln Shafer v2 in �• • :• p0 r R>Creo� fro 1070 0070 0090 0100 0110 0120 0130 0140 � �? a S v _ Beacon Light Rd � N � • �51� 0520 N c 0540 0550 560 0570 Floating Feather Rd U� ` m sN E �@ N EAGLE STAR " LL N ` r S o State St 060p d Sr H/O 0670 062 v goad d o � o OkV+Y c F v pa w yLS a y//Po 0�1• • �° AL N ■■■■■� d Sf o I `m Chinden Blvd o c o 26 ? o �9 go �;!■■■I ^ter GAAD -� Fairview Ave ✓P'�erS r� c o o > d d o al 0950 09so 0970 0980 0990 loon w 1010 1020 CITY ° �j a` ` Sr w m N McMillan Rd o K o 3 0 ��s/° U 11330 1340 1350 Ustick Rd 1370 c J o tj 26 ��S° ecoaca0 ♦��•�����•��'�� ah 1 � ]A,. o iL � 3 rp'� Emerald StCherry Ln 0410 420 0430 0440 0450 0460 II0465FairviewAve mw--PineMERIDIAN Exe 0380 0390� in 15�17'a n'Sr �� PS'1 11ra c4tive Dr 0370 r o r� 0580 2 Franklin Rd Emerald St @ Q° ,�� ? m vaQ d `S-orin9s BOISE 11 -o ��Co ' Rose Hill St 0 1130 1140 1150 1160 11 Overland Rd in o 3 1 �11: 20 o m o w o c E m 26 o'.4ro r B/�'a Beacon St 00 S■ 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 Victory Rd U N ��e o Qa DPW loss M o 0 0 0 0 BOISE N a Born Ne■■■■ I Amity Rd 0020 0030 0040 0050 0060 �• 'a/ T °q ■■■■_ R. • 0S 0 �dl Kootenai St m� �e ,■■■■■ �� 9 ° o as I c o 0 0 o p0� Golye D Overland Rd w ,+ Lake Hazel Rd 0670 0700 0710 0720 p � • n � ,�. o m v ,30 0740 • � N n M o •o O N •°� 1T c520 1530 1540 1550 1560 •S° • IL'Colurnbia Rd0625 0630Hubbard Rd o • 0765U 0300 0310 0320 0330 • Me� , mo Rd o■fL CcDeer Flat Rd o o N O m o � •o Kuna Rd M King Rd 0640 • 0650 0660 w LL � r r N 3 cc 0 1650 Kuna Mora Rd N m v 0 I 0 2 4 Miles 0 County Boundary Roadway Widening Projects East Service Area Unincorporated Ada County 3 lanes West Service Area 2025 - 2045 DRAFT CIP Roadway Projects Incorportated Area 5 lanes - Park/Open Space 7 lanes ACHD 2025 CIP Update • New Roadway(3 lanes) • • • • New Roadway(5 lanes) ACHD 4F �e T 'k,ILA Shafer r DryCreo�. � 3� 0795 0710 0170 0 0150 0140 0160 0110 0120 a , • 0130 Beacon Light Rd li 0435 •0430 0418 J 0400 c� •0825 40 0380 Floating Feather Rd �� m 0420 0390 0410 0835 STAR a EAGLE `°�,. 008300 0828 0826 0480 State St 0830 Hi, 0500 40495 m 'QoagAOy c 0490 a m 65 F r ydy W �� y���a W ` " iMMMME Sst 1 0260 0220 0222 0240 60810 0470 • • 26 oChinden Blvd • • . ��,� �o� ■■.■■1 n�y� 0 GARDEN Fairview Aveof ✓ewer c� I 0700 0690 1010 1020' 1030 1040 CITY a • • ° w McMillan Rd c a 0865 •0860 0 0840 Ustick Rd 0850� o t 26 U �.� e 6ape�\, raf ��-•��•�`vad • O •0825 g 5 h° 1 1050 m 0` Emerald St P �'rco'r �a� `S�` m Y �Sf •0995 0200 0370 0360 ^ ✓ r° Cherry Ln • Fairview Ave 3 ' 0255 e 'L/y nt St 1 0190 02100 Pine Av•e MERIDIA1 Exe 1060 �� f?ar °�tive Dr • t �� •0995 °jS 1070 0440 Franklin Rd Emeraxd St J mQ hr m GeQ "ori°9S BOISE 3 0760 0770 0740 0730 0750 07801fO 0720 wi • verland Rd o � Rose Hill St• • • • o ' 610800 m ~ , 2 < 26 °s er8i� Beacon St 00 0950 :870 0920� •0925 •0900 •0880 •0910 O =° °q a D _ Victory Rd �° ° Q' _____ �11� S 0990 Q' a"i ������,,,��� m 0940 , 0970 BOISE o 0080 w0010 •009s ooso •ooso ooso 0020 0070� > e9�MIR iiii= ooao Amity Rd b 0460 Kootenai Sf o e �..,■■ l D Overland Rd d 0650 0570 0680 0620 0655 0630 0580 0610 0790 Go Wen ° • Lake Hazel Rd• • , 0660 ` 0302 0300 0296 0290 0280 0670 T 985 Columbia Rd , 3w a 0270 � 0530 0526 • 06000522 0510 y� a Hubbard Rd 0520 � 1! A'A v 0350 KU'YC► •0340 0330 0320 0310 oI m Deer Flat Rd 0345 05 E, m a 0 1110 0560 U U �I � 1090 • Kuna Rd c King Rd 0550 0 0546 0540 m LL c m 1120 . r o • •1130 •1140 Kuna Mora Rd rn 1 K 0 0 2 4 Miles U 0 ' I County Boundary Intersection Projects East Service Area Unincorporated Ada County 0 Roundabout West Service Area 2025 - 2045 DRAFT CIP Intersection Projects Incorportated Area 0 Signal - Park/Open Space ACHD 2025 CIP Update le ACHD i hment A TABLE A-1 STREET PROJECTS ACHD 2025 CIP Table A-1:DRAFT Roadway Project Lis[ ACILID East Service Area Augus[19,2025 ff -- Working ID Roadway Segment Start Segment End Tirnefrarne Project Description Preservation ESTIMATED Total Project ESTIMATED TIF Eligible Cost Cost' RD2025-E-0030 36[h S[Ext Cartwright Rd Bogus Basin Rd 2041-2045 Construct new 2-lane roadway,with 40-feet of pavement,and no curb/gutter or sidewalk. Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 RD2025-E-0360 Eisenman Rd Lake Hazel Rd Gowen Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 23,492,000 $ 20,258,000 RD2025-E-0390 Emerald St Cole Rd Curtis Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 4,592,000 $ 4,593,000 RD2025-E-0465 Fairview Ave Cole Rd Curtis Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 7 lanes Co idor Preservation Only $ 28,445,000 $ 28,447,000 RD2025-E-0590 Gowen Rd Orchard St Pleasant Valley Rd 2031-2035 Reconstructwiden to 5lanes $ 7,711,000 $ 5,929,000 RD2025-E-0750 Lake Hazel Rd Ext Orchard St Ext Pleasant Valley Rd 2041-2045 Construct new 5-lane roadway $ 21,311,000 $ 19,114,000 RD2025-E-0760 Lake Hazel Rd Ext Pleasant Valley Rd Existing Railroad 2041-2045 Construct new 5-lane roadway $ 54,723,000 $ 47,820,000 RD2025-E-0765 Lake Hazel Rd Ext Existing Railroad Eisenman Rd 2041-2045 Construct new 5-lane roadway $ 25,575,000 $ 23,163,000 RD2025-E-1090 Orchard St Ext Gowen Rd Victory Rd 2041-2045 1 Construct new 5-lane roadway $ 29,833,000 $ 25,861,000 RD2025-E-3080 Orchard St Ext W Lake Hazel Ext Orchard St Ext 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 10,834,000 $ 8,663,000 RD2025-E-1180 Pleasant Valley Rd Ext Orchard St Ext Pleasant Valley Rd 2036-2040 Construct new 5-lane roadway $ 29,209,000 $ 26,689,000 RD2025-E-1220 State St Gary Ln Pierce Park Ln 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 7lanes $ 11,395,000 $ RD2025-E-1230 State St Pierce Park Ln Collister Or 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 7lanes $ 27,357,000 $ - RD2025-E-1240 State St Collister Dr 36th St 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 7lanes $ 15,144,000 $ RD2025-E-1250 State St 36th St Whitewater Park Blvd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 7lanes $ 15,057,000 $ 14,195,000 RD2025-E-1490 Technology Way Rd Gowen Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,236,000 $ 6,867,000 RD2025-E-1480 Technology Way Ext11.222112a Rd Memory Rd 2041-2045 Construct new 3-lane roadway $ 31,224,000 $ 28,284,000 RD2025-E-1380 Ustick Rd Cale Rd Curtis Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 26,021,000 $ 'Inflated Cost in Future Year Dollars ACHD 2025 CIP Table A-1:DRAFT Roadway Project Lis[ ACILID West Service Area Augus[19,2025 ff -- Working ID Roadway Segment Start Segment End Tirnefrarne Project Description Preservation ESTIMATED Total Project ESTIMATED TIF Eligible Cost Cost' RD2025-W-0020 JAMItY Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) Locust Grove Rd 2041-2045 Reconstructwiden to 5lanes $ 16,834,000 $ 15,041,000 RD2025-W-0030 Amity Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 9,075,000 $ 7,485,000 RD2025-W-0040 Amity Rd Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 10,603,000 $ 9,324,000 RD2025-W-0050 Amity Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 6,291,000 $ 5,038,000 RD2025-W-0060 Amity Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 6,700,000 $ 5,290,000 RD2025-W-0070 Beacon Light Rd Munger Rd Pollard Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes rridor Preservation Only $ 1,050,000 $ 1,051,000 RD2025-W-0090 Beacon Light Rd Emmett Hwy(SH 16) Palmer Ln 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 13,152,000 $ 11,161,000 RD2025-W-0100 Beacon Light Rd Palmer Ln Linder Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 12,753,000 $ 11,630,000 RD2025-W-0130 Beacon Light Rd Linder Rd Park Ln 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes rridor Preservation Only $ 529,000 $ 529,000 RD2025-W-0120 Beacon Light Rd Park Ln Ballantyne Ln 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes or Preservation Only $ 636,000 $ 636,000 RD2025-W-0130 Beacon Light Rd Ballantyne Ln Eagle Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes NPreeNan Only $ 1,334,000 $ 1,334,000 RD2025-W-0140 Beacon Light Rd Eagle Rd SH 55 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes n Only $ 1,308,000 $ 1,308,000 RD2025-W-0150 Black Cat Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2041-2045 ReconstrucUwiden to 3lanes n Only $ 589,000 $ 590,000 RD2025-W-0160 Black Cat Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 2041-2045 ReconstrucUwiden to 5lanes nOnly $ 1,058,000 $ 1,059,000 RD2025-W-0170 Black Cat Rd Overland Rd Franklin Rd 2041-2045 ReconstrucUwiden to 5lanes Only $ 2,055,000 $ 2,056,000 RD2025-W-0180 Black Cat Rd Franklin Rd Cherry Ln 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 9,454,000 $ 7,637,000 RD2025-W-0190 Black Cat Rd Cherry Ln Ustick Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 351,000 $ 351,000 RD2025-W-0200 Black Cat Rd Ustick Rd McMillan Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3 lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,626,000 $ 1,627,000 RD2025-W-0230 Black Cat Rd McMillan Rd Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 71,000 $ 71,000 RD2025-W-0220 Cloverdale Rd Kuna Rd Deer Flat Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 160,000 $ 161,000 RD2025-W-0230 Cloverdale Rd Deer Flat Rd Hubbard Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,563,000 $ 1,563,000 RD2025-W-0240 Cloverdale Rd Hubbard Rd Columbia Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5 lanes NIL Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,656,000 $ 1,657,000 RD2025-W-0250 Cloverdale Rd Columbia Rd Lake Hazel Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,713,000 $ 7,370,000 RD2025-W-0260 Cloverdale Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 7,452,000 $ 3,402,000 RD2025-W-0270 Cloverdale Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2026-2030 ReconstrucUwiden to 5lanes $ 81083,000 $ - RD2025-W-0280 Cloverdale Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 11,926,000 $ RD2025-W-1530 Columbia Rd Black Cat Rd Ten Mile Rd 2041-2045 ReconstrucUwiden to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,018,000 $ 1,019,000 RD2025-W-1520 Columbia Rd Ten Mile Rd Linder Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3 Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,063,000 $ 2,063,000 RD2025-W-1530 Columbia Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) 2041-2045 ReconstructimaeUdElpW Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,863,000 $ 1,864,000 RD2025-W-1540 Columbia Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) Locust Grave Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct1wili 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,657,000 $ 2,657,000 RD2025-W-1550 Columbia Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruc n to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 4,863,000 $ 4,864,000 RD2025-W-1560 Columbia Rd Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 2041-2045 Recons iden to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,159,000 $ 1,159,000 RD2025-W-0300 Deer Flat Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) 2031-2035 Recons den to 5lanes $ 7,970,000 $ 6,600,000 RD2025-W-0330 Deer Flat Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) Locust Grave Rd 2041-2045 Reconstru to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 3,433,000 $ 3,433,000 RD2025-W-0320 Deer Flat Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct1witiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,334,000 $ 2,335,000 RD2025-W-0330 Deer Flat Rd Ext Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 2041-2045 Construct new 3-I d Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,977,000 $ 2,978,000 RD2025-W-0335 Eagle Rd Columbia Rd Lake Hazel Rd 2041- u,--n to Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,362,000 $ 2,363,000 RD2025-W-0370 Emerald St Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd a iden to 51 Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,963,000 $ RD2025-W-0380 Emerald St Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd -2035 Reconstr en to 5lane Corridor Preservation Only $ 11,755,000 $ 11,756,000 RD2025-W-0430 Fairview Ave Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 041-2045 Reconstruc to7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 4,209,000 $ 4,209,000 RD2025-W-0420 Fairview Ave Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd(SH 55) 2026-2030 ReconstrucUw to 7lanes $ 7,414,000 $ 6,292,000 RD2025-W-0430 Fairview Ave Eagle Rd(SH 55) Cloverdale Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/wi o 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,384,000 $ 1,385,000 RD2025-W-0440 Fairview Ave Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/wi o 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,905,000 $ 2,906,000 RD2025-W-0450 Fairview Ave Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 31-2035 Reconstruct/ to 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 3,939,000 $ 3,939,000 RD2025-W-0460 Fairview Ave Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 2045 Reconstruc n to 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 8,375,000 $ 8,376,000 RD2025-W-0470 Five Mile Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2 5 Reconstr den to 5lanes $ 8,536,000 $ 4,181,000 RD2025-W-0480 Five Mile Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2026- Reco widen to 5lanes $ 9,092,000 $ - RD2025-W-0490 Five Mile Rd Overland Rd Franklin Rd 2026-20 uct/widen to 5lanes $ 9,273,000 $ RD2025-W-0500 Five Mile Rd Ustick Rd McMillan Rd 2041-2045 nstruct/widen to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 12,683,000 $ 12,683,000 RD2025-W-0520 Floating Feather Rd Star Rd Plummer Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,687,000 $ 2,689,000 RD2025-W-0540 Floating Feather Rd Emmett Hwy(SH 16) Palmer Ln 2041-2045 Construct new 3-lane roadway $ 8,238,000 $ 6,865,000 RD2025-W-0550 Floating Feather Rd Palmer Ln Linder Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 13,631,000 $ 11,327,000 RD2025-W-0560 Floating Feather Rd Linder Rd Park Ln 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,504,000 $ 1,504,000 RD2025-W-0570 Floating Feather Rd Park Ln Ballantyne Ln 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 799,000 $ 800,000 RD2025-W-O530 Floating Feather Rd Ext Can Ada Rd Star Rd 2041-2045 Construct new 3-lane roadway Corridor Preservation Only $ 6,143,000 $ 6,144,000 RD2025-W-0580 Franklin Rd McDermott Rd I Black Cat Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,808,000 $ 7,453,000 RD2025-W-0600 Hill Rd Parkway SH 55 IDuncan Ln 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5 lanes $ 8,786,000 $ 7,188,000 RD2025-W-0630 HIIIRd Parkway Duncan Ln ISeamans Gulch Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 7,885,000 $ 6,571,000 RD2025-W-0620 Hill Rd Parkway Seamans Gulch Rd 10ary Ln 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 2,140,000 $ 1,786,000 'Inflated Cost in Future Year Dollars Working ID Roadway Segment Start I Segment End Timeframe Project Description Prese I RD2025-W-0625 Hubbard Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 9,448,000 $ 7,899,000 RD2025-W-0630 Hubbard Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) Locust Grove Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,199,000 $ 2,199,000 RD2025-W-0640 King Rd Swan Falls Rd Meridian Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,474,000 $ 1,475,000 RD2025-W-0650 King Rd Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 844,000 $ 845,000 RD2025-W-0660 King Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 677,000 $ 677,000 RD2025-W-1650 Kuna Mora Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 174,000 $ 174,000 RD2025-W-0670 Lake Hazel Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd ISM 69) 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,632,000 $ 1,633,000 RD2025-W-0700 Lake Hazel Rd Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,551,000 $ 6,986,000 RD2025-W-0730 Lake Hazel Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 7,293,000 $ 6,095,000 RD2025-W-0720 Lake Hazel Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 10,101,000 $ 8,539,000 RD2025-W-0730 Lake Hazel Rd Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,189,000 $ 6,655,000 RD2025-W-0740 Lake Hazel Rd Cole Rd Orchard St Ext 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 12,671,000 $ 10,817,000 RD2025-W-0767 Linder Rd Deer Flat Rd Hubbard Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 6,230,000 $ 5,010,000 RD2025-W-0768 Linder Rd Hubbard Rd Columbia Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5 lanes A $ 8,835,000 $ 7,481,000 RD2025-W-0769 Linder Rd Columbia Rd Lake Hazel Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes or Preservation Only $ 1,067,000 $ 1,068,000 RD2025-W-0770 Linder Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes Preservation Only $ 1,998,000 $ 1,999,000 RD2025-W-0780 Linder Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes Corn ervation Only $ 2,573,000 $ 2,573,000 RD2025-W-0790 Linder Rd Victory Rd Overland Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 14,426,000 $ 12,675,000 RD2025-W-0800 Linder Rd Overland Rd Franklin Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 9,200,000 $ 8,009,000 RD2025-W-0830 Linder Rd Pine Ave Ustick Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 39,326,000 $ 36,453,000 RD2025-W-0840 Linder Rd Chinden Blvd(US 20/ State St ISM 44) 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 7lanes $ 101,482,000 $ 84,679,000 RD2025-W-0850 Linder Rd State St(SH 44) Floating Feather Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,127,000 $ 7,098,000 RD2025-W-0851 Linder Rd Floating Feather Rd Beacon Light Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 8,627,000 $ 6,816,000 RD2025-W-0853 Locust Grove Rd Hubbard Rd Columbia Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 3 lanes $ 7,165,000 $ 5,788,000 RD2025-W-0854 Locust Grove Rd Columbia Rd Lake Hazel Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 12,168,000 $ 9,879,000 RD2025-W-0855 Locust Grove Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 10,606,000 $ 81595,000 RD2025-W-0860 Locust Grove Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 11,095,000 $ 5,815,000 RD2025-W-0880 Locust Grove Rd Fairview Ave Ustick Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 10,877,000 $ - RD2025-W-0890 Locust Grove Rd Ustick Rd McMillan Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 1,465,000 $ RD2025-W-0900 Locust Grove Rd McMillan Rd Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 2041-2045 Reconstructwiden to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 4,015,000 $ 4,017,000 RD2025-W-0930 Maple Grove Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 3,941,000 $ 3,941,000 RD2025-W-0920 Maple Grove Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2026-2030 ReconstrucUwiden to 5lanes $ 11,507,000 $ - RD2025-W-0950 McMillan Rd Star Rd McDermott Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3 Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,028,000 $ 2,030,000 RD2025-W-0960 McMillan Rd McDermott Rd Black Cat Rd 2041-2045 ReconstructimaeadlIP111IN111111411 L Corridor Preservation Only $ 557,000 $ 558,000 RD2025-W-0970 McMillan Rd Black Cat Rd Ten Mile Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/w' 3lanes I Corridor Preservation Only $ 872,000 $ 872,000 RD2025-W-0980 McMillan Rd Ten Mile Rd Linder Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruc n to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 3,349,000 $ 3,349,000 RD2025-W-0990 McMillan Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd 2041-2045 Recons iden to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 5,774,000 $ 3,343,000 RD2025-W-1000 McMillan Rd Meridian Rd Locust Grove Rd 2026-2030 Recons 'den to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,137,000 $ 1,238,000 RD2025-W-3030 McMillan Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruc to 51anes Corridor Preservation Only $ 12,618,000 $ 12,618,000 RD2025-W-3020 McMillan Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2041-2045 ReconstrucU 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 6,448,000 $ 6,448,000 RD2025-W-3050 Meridian Rd Ustick Rd McMillan Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/wide $ 8,324,000 $ 7,170,000 RD2025-W-3060 Meridian Rd McMillan Rd Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 2041- uct/widen to $ 9,342,000 $ 7,529,000 RD2025-W-3030 Meridian Rd Ext King Rd Kuna Rd 5-lane roa Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,426,000 $ 2,426,000 RD2025-W-1070 New Hope Rd Can Ada Rd Munger Rd -2045 Reconsti-MMen to 3lane Corridor Preservation Only $ 3,160,000 $ 3,161,000 RD2025-W-1130 Overland Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 041-2045 Reconstruct to 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 4,674,000 $ 4,674,000 RD2025-W-1140 Overland Rd Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/w to 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 6,382,000 $ 6,382,000 RD2025-W-1150 Overland Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 4W 2041-2045 Reconstruct/wi o 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 7,918,000 $ 7,918,000 RD2025-W-1160 Overland Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/wi o 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 11,539,000 $ - RD2025-W-1170 Overland Rd Maple Grove Rd Cole Rd 36-2040 Reconstruct/ to 7lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 11,044,000 $ 11,045,000 RD2025-W-1130 Overland Rd Ext McDermott Rd Black Cat Rd 2045 Reconstruc n to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 6,445,000 $ 6,445,000 RD2025-W-1120 Overland Rd Ext Black Cat Rd Ten Mile Rd 2 5 Reconstr den to 3lan)s Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,236,000 $ 2,237,000 RD2025-W-1226 Palmer Ln State St(SH 44) Floating Feather Rd 2036- Re co widen to 3lanes $ 14,784,000 $ 13,119,000 RD2025-W-1222 Plummer Rd State St(SH 44) Floating Feather Rd 2041-20 uct/widen to 3lanes $ 12,501,000 $ 9,219,000 RD2025-W-1224 Pollard Ln Floating Feather Rd Beacon Light Rd 2041-2045 nstruct/widen to 3lanes $ 11,265,000 $ 9,527,000 RD2025-W-1190 Star Rd Ustick Rd McMillan Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,204,000 $ 2,205,000 RD2025-W-1200 Star Rd McMillan Rd Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 608,000 $ 609,000 RD2025-W-1230 Star Rd Chinden Blvd(US 20/ State St ISM 44) 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 32,409,000 $ 14,946,000 RD2025-W-1260 Ten Mile Rd Deer Flat Rd Hubbard Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,020,000 $ 6,619,000 RD2025-W-1270 Ten Mile Rd Hubbard Rd Columbia Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,028,000 $ 6,666,000 RD2025-W-1280 Ten Mile Rd Columbia Rd Lake Hazel Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 12,844,000 $ 11,145,000 RD2025-W-1290 Ten Mile Rd Lake Hazel Rd Amity Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 30,422,000 $ 8,390,000 RD2025-W-1300 Ten Mile Rd Amity Rd Victory Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,091,000 $ 6,667,000 RD2025-W-1330 Ustick Rd Can Ada Rd Star Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 9,183,000 $ 6,872,000 RD2025-W-1340 Ustick Rd Star Rd McDermott Rd 2026-2030 Reconstructwiden to 5lanes $ 7,613,000 $ 6,433,000 'Inflated Cost in Future Year Dollars Working ID Roadway Segment Start I Segment End Timeframe Project Description K'ESTIMATED Total Project ESTIMATED TIF Eligible Preservalff Cost' Cost I RD2025-W-1350 Ustick Rd McDermott Rd Black Cat Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,261,000 $ 7,112,000 RD2025-W-1370 Ustick Rd Ten Mile Rd Linder Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 8,123,000 $ 6,704,000 RD2025-W-1390 Victory Rd Black Cat Rd Ten Mile Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 956,000 $ 956,000 RD2025-W-1400 Victory Rd Ten Mile Rd Linder Rd 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 3lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 2,981,000 $ 2,981,000 RD2025-W-1430 Victory Rd Linder Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) 2041-2045 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes Corridor Preservation Only $ 7,333,000 $ 7,333,000 RD2025-W-1420 Victory Rd Meridian Rd(SH 69) Locust Grove Rd 2026-2030 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 9,978,000 $ 4,844,000 RD2025-W-1430 Victory Rd Locust Grove Rd Eagle Rd 2036-2040 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 14,043,000 $ 6,602,000 RD2025-W-1440 Victory Rd Eagle Rd Cloverdale Rd 2031-2035 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 11,489,000 $ 51809,000 rRD2025-W-1460 2025-W-1450 Victory Rd Cloverdale Rd Five Mile Rd 2026-2030 ReconstrucUwiden to 5lanes $ 15,421,000 $ Victory Rd Five Mile Rd Maple Grove Rd 2031-2035 ReconstrucUwiden to 5lanes $ 10,996,000 $2025-W-1470 JVIctory Rd Maple Grave Rd JCole Rd 1 2031-2035 1 Reconstruct/widen to 5lanes $ 9,709,000 $ 'Inflated Cost in Future Year Dollars �tac -- ner� � TABLE A-2 INTERSECTIONS PROJECTS ACHD 2025 CIP Table A-2:DRAFT Intersection Project List ACl-1 D East Service Area August19,2025rob , Planned Service ESTIMATED Total ESTIMATED TIF Intersection Type Are. T= Project Cost 1 Eligible Cost 1 IN2025-E-0995 Broadway Ave&Warm Springs Ave Signal East 2026-2030 $ 6,164,000 $ - IN2025-E-0255 Curtis Rd&Fairview Ave Signal East 2041-2045 $ 18,773,000 $ 15,435,000 IN2025-E-0180 Eckert Rd&Boise Ave Roundabout East 2031-2035 $ 3,646,000 $ 2,944,000 IN2025-E-0970 Eckert Rd&Warm Springs Ave Roundabout East 2031-2035 $ 4,508,000 $ 3,656,000 IN2025-E-0605 Eisenman Rd&I-84 EB Ramps Signal East 2041-2045 $ 4,915,000 $ 3,397,000 IN2025-E-0600 Eisenman Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Ext Roundabout East 2041-2045 $ 5,883,000 $ 4,780,000 IN2025-WE-0495 Gary Ln&Hill Rd Roundabout East/West 2036-2040 $ 4,627,000 $ 3,784,000 IN2025-WE-0810 Glenwood St/Gary Ln&State St Signal East/West 2036-2040 $ 13,650,000 $ 6,364,000 IN2025-E-0470 Hill Rd&CoRister Dr Signal East 2031-2035 $ 3,533,000 $ - IN2025-E-0490 Hill Rd&Pierce Park Ln Roundabout East 2036-2040 $ 4,858,000 $ 3,882,000 IN2025-E-0460 Orchard St&Gowen Rd Roundabout East 2031-2035 $ 7,374,000 $ 6,037,000 IN2025-E-0660 Orchard St Ext&Lake Hazel Rd Roundabout East 2041-2045 $ 7,482,000 $ 6,438,000 IN2025-E-0790 Orchard St Ext&Pleasant Valley Rd Roundabout East 2036-2040 $ 6.186,000 $ 5,250,000 IN2025-E-0670 Pleasant Valley Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Roundabout East 2041-2045 OF 1M, 8,112,000 $ 6,658,000 IN2025-E-0985 Technology Way&Columbia Rd Signal East 2041-204 5,633,000 $ 4,635,000 IN2025-E-0990 Warm Springs Ave&Parkcenter Blvd(East) Roundabout East 2031- $ 646,000 $ 2,944,000 IN2025-E-0825 Whitewater Park Blvd&State St Signal East 20 35 $ mi000 $ 7,210,000 'Inflated Cost in Future Year Dollars ACHD 2025 CIP Table A-2:DRAFT Intersection Project List AC1�,1 D West Service Area rl August19,2025 Intersection ervice TM i ESTIMATED Total ESTIMATED T1,FJ -A =�Area Project Cost 1 Eligible Cost IN2025-W-0110 Beacon Light Rd&Ballantyne Ln Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,668,000 $ 4,571,000 IN2025-W-0010 Black Cat Rd&Amity Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,552,000 $ 4,450,000 IN2025-W-0190 Black Cat Rd&Cherry Ln Roundabout West 2036-2040 $ 5,797,000 $ 4,656,000 IN2025-W-0220 Black Cat Rd&Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 26) Signal West 2041-2045 $ 12,550,000 $ 3,631,000 IN2025-W-0302 Black Cat Rd&Columbia Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,530,000 $ 4,426,000 IN2025-W-0570 Black Cat Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,497,000 $ 4,392,000 IN2025-W-0690 Black Cat Rd&McMillan Rd Roundabout West 2026-2030 $ 3,850,000 $ 3,090,000 IN2025-W-0720 Black Cat Rd&Overland Rd Ext Signal West 2041-2045 $ 6,912,000 $ 5,623,000 IN2025-W-0840 Black Cat Rd&Ustick Rd Signal West 2026-2030 $ 4,594,000 $ 3,667,000 IN2025-W-0870 Black Cat Rd&Victory Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 6,745,000 $ 5,465,000 IN2025-W-0435 Can Ada Rd&Floating Feather Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 3,487,000 $ 2,762,000 IN2025-W-0715 Can Ada Rd&New Hope Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 4,245,000 $ 2,638,000 IN2025-W-0835 Can Ada Rd&State St(SH 44) Signal West 2036-2040 $ 4.828,000 $ 1,528,000 IN2025-W-0865 Can Ada Rd&Ustick Rd Signal West 2026-2030 5,614,000 $ 2,487,000 IN2025-W-0020 Cloverdale Rd&Amity Rd Roundabout West 2026-203 5,658,000 $ 4,656,000 IN2025-W-0270 Cloverdale Rd&Columbia Rd Roundabout West 2041- $ 783,000 $ 5,504,000 IN2025-W-0310 Cloverdale Rd&Deer Flat Rd Roundabout West 20 45 $ 000 $ 4,890,000 IN2025-W-0360 Cloverdale Rd&Fairview Ave Signal West 2045 $ 15, 0 $ 12,902,000 IN2025-W-0510 Cloverdale Rd&Hubbard Rd Roundabout West 031-2035 5,299, 0 $ 4,300,000 IN2025-W-1140 Cloverdale Rd&Kuna Mora Rd Signal West 041-2045 4,059,000 $ 3,140,000 IN2025-W-0560 Cloverdale Rd&Kuna Rd Roundabout West 1-20 $ 5,511,000 $ 4,406,000 IN2025-W-0580 Cloverdale Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Roundabout West 2 $ 5,708,000 $ 4,708,000 IN2025-W-0730 Cloverdale Rd&Overland Rd Signal West 204 $ 19,451,000 $ 15,591,000 IN2025-W-0880 Cloverdale Rd&Victory Rd Signal est 2031-20 $ 11,429,000 $ 9,328,000 IN2025-W-0120 Eagle Rd&Beacon Light Rd Roundabou 2041-2045 5,556,000 $ 4,454,000 IN2025-W-0280 Eagle Rd&Columbia Rd Roundabout West 45 $ 8,041,000 $ 6,366,000 IN2025-W-0320 Eagle Rd&Deer Flat Rd Roundabout West 204 - $ 5,934,000 $ 4,862,000 IN2025-W-0540 Eagle Rd&King Rd Roundabout es 2041-2045 $ 5,539,000 $ 4,435,000 IN2025-W-1130 Eagle Rd&Kuna Mora Rd nal 2041-2045 $ 3,675,000 $ 2,904,000 IN2025-W-0740 Eagle Rd&Overland Rd l st 2041-2045 $ 15,268,000 $ 12,447,000 IN2025-W-0900 Eagle Rd&Victory Rd Si t 2031-2035 $ 8,122,000 $ 6,539,000 IN2025-W-0040 Five Mile Rd&Amity Rd Roun out 2031-2035 $ 5,301,000 $ 4,302,000 IN2025-W-0610 Five Mile Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Ro est 2026-2030 $ 5,563,000 $ 4,557,000 IN2025-W-1040 Five Mile Rd&McMillan Rd gnal West 2041-2045 $ 13,281,000 $ 10,882,000 IN2025-W-0750 Five Mile Rd&Overland Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 14,919,000 $ 12,417,000 IN2025-W-1050 Five Mile Rd&UstickJJ Signal West 2026-2030 $ 7,637,000 $ 6,150,000 IN2025-W-0910 Five Mile Rd&Vic d nal West 2031-2035 $ 7,798,000 $ 6,324,000 IN2025-W-0380 Floating Feath &Ballantyne Ln Ro ndabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,617,000 $ 4,518,000 IN2025-W-1070 Franklin Rd Dermott Rd Signal West 2026-2030 $ 4,260,000 $ 2,480,000 IN2025-WE-0495 Gary Ln&Hill Roundabout East/West 2036-2040 $ 4,627,000 $ 3,784,000 IN2025-WE-0810 Glenwood St/Gar State St Signal East/West 2036-2040 $ 13,650,000 $ 6,364,000 IN2025-W-0480 Hill Rd&Horseshoe d Roundabout West 2036-2040 $ 6,334,000 $ 5,221,000 IN2025-W-0050 Linder Rd&Amity Rd Roundabout West 2036-2040 $ 6,096,000 $ 4,971,000 IN2025-W-0140 Linder Rd&Beacon Light Rd Roundabout West 2031-2035 $ 5,324,000 $ 4,326,000 IN2025-W-0200 Linder Rd&Cherry Ln Signal West 2031-2035 $ 7,710,000 $ 6,232,000 IN2025-W-0222 Linder Rd&Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 26) Signal West 2026-2030 $ 13,268,000 $ 6,381,000 IN2025-W-0296 Linder Rd&Columbia Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 7,400,000 $ 6,121,000 IN2025-W-0345 Linder Rd&Deer Flat Rd Signal West 2031-2035 $ 6,723,000 $ 5,389,000 IN2025-W-0390 Linder Rd&Floating Feather Rd Roundabout West 2036-2040 $ 6,333,000 $ 5,219,000 IN2025-W-0440 Linder Rd&Franklin Rd Signal West 2026-2030 $ 8,803,000 $ 7,128,000 IN2025-W-0526 Linder Rd&Hubbard Rd Roundabout West 2031-2035 $ 5,104,000 $ 4,167,000 IN2025-W-0620 Linder Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 6,750,000 $ 5,469,000 IN2025-W-1010 Linder Rd&McMillan Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 11,559,000 $ 9,432,000 IN2025-W-0760 Linder Rd&Overland Rd Signal West 2031-2035 $ 8,706,000 $ 7,013,000 IN2025-W-0920 Linder Rd&Victory Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 8,152,000 $ 6,699,000 IN2025-W-0060 Locust Grove Rd&Amity Rd Roundabout West 2036-2040 $ 7,115,000 $ 5,827,000 IN2025-W-0240 Locust Grove Rd&Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 26) Signal West 2041-2045 $ 13,953,000 $ 4,894,000 IN2025-W-0290 Locust Grove Rd&Columbia Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 7,507,000 $ 6,319,000 IN2025-W-0330 Locust Grove Rd&Deer Flat Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 6,923,000 $ 5,652,000 IN2025-W-0370 Locust Grove Rd&Fairview Ave Signal West 2026-2030 $ 10,728,000 $ 8,790,000 IN2025-W-0520 Locust Grove Rd&Hubbard Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 6,380,000 $ 5,172,000 'Inflated Cost in Future Year Dollars ID Intersection Planned ice Ti TIMATED To al E-STI Type Project Cost E igibi IN2025-W-1120 Locust Grove Rd&Kuna Mora Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 3,888,000 $ 2,987,000 IN2025-W-0630 Locust Grove Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 8,073,000 $ 6,618,000 IN2025-W-1030 Locust Grove Rd&McMillan Rd Signal West 2026-2030 $ 8,337,000 $ 6,798,000 IN2025-W-0770 Locust Grove Rd&Overland Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 17,732,000 $ 14,515,000 IN2025-W-0850 Locust Grove Rd&Ustick Rd Signal West 2026-2030 $ 7,265,000 $ 5,858,000 IN2025-W-0070 Maple Grove Rd&Amity Rd Roundabout West 2031-2035 $ 5,806,000 $ 4,765,000 IN2025-W-0780 Maple Grove Rd&Overland Rd Signal West 2031-2035 $ 12,090,000 $ 10,024,000 IN2025-W-0940 Maple Grove Rd&Victory Rd Roundabout West 2031-2035 $ 6,244,000 $ 5,103,000 IN2025-W-0080 McDermott Rd&Amity Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,497,000 $ 3,559,000 IN2025-W-0650 McDermott Rd&Lake Hazel Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,497,000 $ 3,559,000 IN2025-W-1080 McDermott Rd&Overland Rd Ext Signal West 2041-2045 $ 4,645,000 $ 3,001,000 IN2025-W-0950 McDermott Rd&Victory Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,497,000 $ 3,559,000 IN2025-W-0546 Meridian Rd&King Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 4,544,000 $ 3,594,000 IN2025-W-1020 Meridian Rd&McMillan Rd Signal West 2026-2030 $ 9,025,000 $ 7,504,000 IN2025-W-0090 Meridian Rd(SH 69)&Amity Rd Signal West 2041-2045 $ 11,050,000 $ 5,574,000 IN2025-W-0340 Meridian Rd(SH 69)&Deer Flat Rd Signal West 2031-2035 $ 7,266,000 $ 3,619,000 IN2025-W-0522 Meridian Rd(SH 69)&Hubbard Rd Signal West 2031-2035 $ 6,539,000 $ 3,325,000 IN2025-W-1110 Meridian Rd(SH 69)&Kuna Rd Signal West 2031-2035 $ 8.242,000 $ 3,971,000 IN2025-W-0655 Meridian Rd(SH 69)&Lake Hazel Rd Signal West 2041-2045 9,364,000 $ 5,391,000 IN2025-W-0925 Meridian Rd(SH 69)&Victory Rd Signal West 2041-204W 13,900,000 $ 7,061,000 IN2025-W-1060 Milwaukee St&Emerald St Signal West 2031- $ 106,000 $ 6,648,000 IN2025-W-0710 New Hope Rd&Munger Rd Roundabout West 20 45 $ 000 $ 4,663,000 IN2025-W-0150 Palmer Ln&Beacon Light Rd Roundabout West -2045 $ 6, 0 $ 5,675,000 IN2025-W-0400 Palmer Ln&Floating Feather Rd Roundabout West 036-2040 5,161, 0 $ 4,199,000 IN2025-W-0826 Palmer Ln&State St(SH 44) Signal West 036-2040 6,922,000 $ 2,507,000 IN2025-W-0160 Park Ln&Beacon Light Rd Roundabout West 1-20 $ 5,714,000 $ 4,621,000 IN2025-W-0410 Park Ln&Floating Feather Rd Roundabout West 2 $ 5,757,000 $ 4,667,000 IN2025-W-0420 Plummer Rd&Floating Feather Rd Signal West 204 $ 31685,000 $ 2,943,000 IN2025-W-0828 Plummer Rd&State St(SH 44) Signal est 2036-20 $ 7,381,000 $ 2,955,000 IN2025-W-0170 Pollard Ln&Beacon Light Rd Roundabou ,2U41-20451 5,847,000 $ 4,760,000 IN2025-W-0418 Pollard Ln&Floating Feather Rd Signal West 45 $ 3,754,000 $ 3,017,000 IN2025-W-0500 Seamans Gulch Rd&Hill Road Pkwy Roundabout West APF203 - $ 4,422,000 $ 3,594,000 IN2025-W-0130 SH 16&Beacon Light Rd Signal WesW 2031-2035 $ 10,659,000 $ 5,283,000 IN2025-W-0260 Star Rd&Chinden Blvd(US 20/US 26) doElhignal Ilff 2031-2035 $ 13,175,000 $ 6,161,000 IN2025-W-0430 Star Rd&Floating Feather Rd Iftl st 2041-2045 $ 4,361,000 $ 3,397,000 IN2025-W-0700 Star Rd&McMillan Rd ff RouncWut t 2041-2045 $ 5,658,000 $ 4,561,000 IN2025-W-0830 Star Rd&State St(SH 44) Si 2036-2040 $ 10,628,000 $ 5,725,000 IN2025-W-0860 Star Rd&Ustick Rd Ift Nowest 2026-2030 $ 4,401,000 $ 3,044,000 IN2025-W-1090 Swan Falls Rd&Avalon St IL Wdabout West 2026-2030 $ 3,222,000 $ IN2025-W-0550 Swan Falls Rd&King Rd oundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,534,000 $ 4,431,000 IN2025-W-0095 Ten Mile Rd&Amity RjW qWundabout West 2036-2040 $ 6,817,000 $ 5,514,000 IN2025-W-0210 Ten Mile Rd&Che nal West 2036-2040 $ 8,494,000 $ - IN2025-W-0300 Ten Mile Rd& bia Rd Ro ndabout West 2041-2045 $ 7,010,000 $ 5,714,000 IN2025-W-0350 Ten Mile Rd er Flat Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 5,912,000 $ 4,773,000 IN2025-W-0530 Ten Mile Rd& rd Rd Roundabout West 2036-2040 $ 6,383,000 $ 5,271,000 IN2025-W-0680 Ten Mile Rd&Lak l Rd Roundabout West 2041-2045 $ 7,682,000 $ 5,946,000 'Inflated Cost in Future Year Dollars EXHIBIT A-Draft Traffic Impact Fee Schedule FY2026 Fee Table Service Area Ordinance#TBD Adjustment Factors WEST EAST WEST EAST I WEST I EAST Verify all non listed uses and appropriate Service Area 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 Norm M. 11F= application of land uses with the ACHD Impact 0.90 0.90 Fee Administrator Land Use Trip Length 0.75 0.75 Adjustment Factors 0.50 0.50 0.25 1 0.25 ITE-12th Edition ADJUSTMENT FACTORS New Trip PM Peak Hour x (Pass-By x x x _ Only) Land Use ITE Cade *WESTEAST WEST EAST WEST EAST Single Family 210 •0.465 1.00 7.62 7.92 A70. $5,396 $3,782 $8,929 $5,348 Single Family Attached Housing 215 0.255 1.00 7.62 7.92 $5,396 $3,782 $4,896 $2,933 Multifamily Housing 220&221 Contact ACHD Impact Fee Team for Assessment Mobile Home 240 0.230 1.00 5.72 5.94 $5,396 $3,782 $3,315 $1,984 Accessory Dwelling Unit ACHD 4 0.155 1.00 7.62 7.92 $5,396 $3,782 $2,976 $1,783 Senior Adult Housingrp 251&252 Contact ACHD Impact Fee Team for Assessment Assisted Living 254 0.12 1.00 7.62 2 0.467 0.384 $5, $3,782 $2,304 $1,380 Hotel 310 0.235 1.00 7.62 67 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $4,512 $2,703 Motel 320 0.185 1.00 7.62 7. .467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $3,552 $2,128 - rrr Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 1.765 0.7 3.81 3.96 67 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $12,201 $7,308 Automobile Sales,New 840 1.145 0.7 5.94 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $12,367 $7,408 Automobile Sales,Used 841 1.875 0.75 4 0. 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $20,252 $12,131 Automobile Care Center/Repair 942 2.450 0.72 3.81 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $16,936 $10,145 Automobile Parts Sales 843 2.430 0.57 3.81 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $13,298 $7,966 Automated Car Wash 948 12.200 0.44 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $25,837 $15,436 Bank(With Drive-Thru) 912 10.515 0.65 1 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $32,896 $19,654 Church 560 1.00 3.96 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $2,064 $1,236 Coffee/Donut Shop No Drive-Thru 936 15.76 0.13 .91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $9,864 $5,893 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru 937 19.500 13 91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $12,201 $7,289 Day Care 565 5.375 56 1 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $14,487 $8,655 Drinking Place/Bar 97 3.220 .57 3.96 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $17,622 $10,555 Free-standing Discount Store 815 2.430 2 5.94 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $29,072 $17,399 Free-standing Discount Superstore 813 2.160 5.72 5.94 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $22,105 $13,230 Hair Salon 918 0.7 0.83 5.72 5.94 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $8,666 $5,191 Hardware/Paint Store 816 0.74 5.72 5.94 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $15,893 $9,512 Home Improvement Superstore 40 0.58 5.72 5.94 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $9,531 $5,704 Hospital 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $8,257 $4,946 Light Industrial 110 0. 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $4,704 $2,818 Manufacturing 140 0.31 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $6,049 $3,623 Mini-Warehouse(Self Storage) 151 0.070 1.00 3.81 3.96 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $672 $403 Pharmacy/Drug Store(No Drive-Thru) 880 4.255 0.47 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $9,625 $5,751 Pharmacy/Drug Store(With Drive-Thru) 881 5.120 0.51 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $12,568 $7,509 Restaurant-Fast Casual 930 7.175 0.57 3.81 3.96 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $39,265 $23,520 Restaurant-Fast Food(No Drive-Thru) 933 18.365 0.57 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $50,383 $30,101 Restaurant-Fast Food(With Drive-Thru) 934 15.800 0.50 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $38023 $22717 Shopping Center 82 1.630 0.66 6.86 7.13 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $18:592 $11:137 Supermarket(Free Standing) 4.395 0.64 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $13,538 $8,088 Tire Store 1.925 0.72 3.81 3.96 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $13,307 $7,971 Variety Store(Dollar Store) 14 3.350 0.66 3.81 3.96 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $21,228 $12,716 Warehousing 150 0.075 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $1,440 $863 Per rrr SF Dental/Vision Office ACHD 1 1.315 1.00 4.12 4.12 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $13652 $7868 General Office(Greater than 10 KSF) 710 0.590 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5.396 $3,782 $11:329 $6,,786 Small Office Buildinq(Less than 10 KSF) 712 1.080 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $20,738 $12,422 Medical Office 720 1.710 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $32,835 $19,669 Walk In Clinic 630 1.835 1.00 5.72 5.94 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $26,427 $15,830 IndicatedPer Unit Charter Elementary School(Students) 536 0.080 1.00 7.62 7.92 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $1,536 $920 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru No Indoor Seats(per DT Lanes) 938 7.540 0.13 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $4,536 $2,710 Food Cart Pod(Food Carts) 926 3.080 0.57 3.81 3.96 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $16,855 $10,097 Gas Station with Conv Mkt 2-4 KSF(Fueling Position) 945 7.925 0.44 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $16,783 $10,027 Gas Station with Conv Mkt 4-5.5 KSF(Fueling Position) 945 9.575 0.44 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $20,277 $12,115 Gas Station with Conv Mkt 5.5-10 KSF(Fueling Position) 945 10.540 0.44 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $22,321 $13,336 Quick Lubrication(Servicing Positions) 941 2.425 0.57 1.91 1.98 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $6,653 $3,975 Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage(Space) ACHD5 0.010 1.00 3.09 3.09 0.467 0.384 $5,396 $3,782 $78 $45 Ordinance#TBD Page A-1 FY2026 Fee Table Effective TBD Serv'l*Ce Area 9 ACHD Commission Direction - Two Service Areas ee¢oon Lyh[Rd q� P�b�FeamerRe STAR EAGLE R�Pkw N $ z Ghlntlen BNd � GA DEN � MCMklsnldd � � ;::fib;: 418irk Rd �j c' 5 Cnerry FAN-Are MERIDIAN t Pine A,e �x Llrve Dr Emetak Sl `G F—Mm Rd , ISE ~'�' �J • U:c•Innc R� ' e E WEST LL m26 EAST Amily Rd lake Maxei Rd R a m Goiumhia Rd 3 Rubha a Rd 6 KUNA Deer Piet Ra S Ky and King Rd N j2 2 Kenn Irl—id 0 2 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2026 Citywide Fee Update FY2026 Citywide Fee Update •Agenda Next Steps•Database •Proposed Fees by Departments•Goals•Policy 9.14 )(Full Cost Recovery Methodology •Fee Development Process Fee Development Process AnalysisCost Finance InputDepartment ReviewMayor’s ReviewCouncils HearingPublic Adoption Full Cost Recovery No Cost Recovery associated to an activity/program.of all costs 0% Activities/Programs will be assessed a fee to collect •Minimal Cost Recovery costs associated to an activity/program.of all 49% -1%Activities/Programs will be assessed a fee to collect •Partial Cost Recovery costs associated to an activity/program.of all 79% -50%Activities/Programs will be assessed a fee to collect •Majority Cost Recovery costs associated to an activity/program.of all 99% -80%Activities/Programs will be assessed a fee to collect •Full Cost Recovery costs associated to an activity/program.of all 100% Activities/Programs will be assessed a fee to collect • Goals personnel and material driven increases in -keep pace with inflationAdjust fees annually to Proposed Fee 14 fees with change greater that 5%through state/federal agency fees -staff time and pass–Cost Factors Used )2047-Resolution 17(Last update was 2017 SummaryClerks City Proposed Fee 10 fees with change greater that 5%staff time–Cost Factors Used )2167-Resolution 19(Last update was 2019 SummaryFire Proposed Fee 7 fees with change greater that 5%staff time and materials–Cost Factors Used )2037-Resolution 17(Last update was 2017 SummaryPolice Proposed Fee 29 fees with change greater that 5%staff time–Cost Factors Used )1003-Resolution 14(Last update was 2014 SummaryPlanning City Fees Database for the publicEnhances transparency •ScheduleDrives published Fee •methodologyTracks history and •feesCentral repository of all • Next Steps Council AdoptionPublic HearingissuedPublic Notice ResolutionLegal drafts Fee Council directionToday Questions All Fees Department Fee Description Current Fee Proposed Proposed$ Proposed % Recovery Method Recovery Fee Change Change % Clerks Alcohol catering permit Alcohol Permit $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ - 0.00% State/Fed Controlled 100% Clerks Attorney Laborto redact nonpublic records(Idaho Resident) Hours 1&2 Bound by I.C.74-102(10) $ 50.00 $ - $ (50.00) -100.00% No Cost-0% 0% Clerks Attorney Labor to redact nonpublic records(Idaho Resident) Hours 3&up Bound by I.C.74-102(10) $ 60.00 $ 72.48 $ 12.48 20.80% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Beer License by the drink $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Beer License retail $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Campaign Filing Fee Fee to file declaration of candidacyfor elective City office per Idaho Code section 50.406 $ 40.00 $ 40.00 $ - 0.00% State/Fed Controlled 100% Clerks Dog License Fees Dog License $ 16.00 $ 10.00 $ (6.00) -37.50% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Dog License Fees Replacement Tag $ 5.00 $ 6.21 $ 1.21 24.26% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Fireworks Display Permit $ 125.00 $ 120.05 $ (4.95) -3.96% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Liquor License bythe drink $ 562.50 $ 562.50 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Liquor/beer/wine license transfer $ 100.00 $ 71.60 $ (28.40) -28.40% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Mobile sales unit license (includes$33.251SP background check fee) $ 73.25 $ 221.97 $ 148.72 203.03% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Other labor to respond to public records request(Idaho Resident) Hours 1&2 $ - $ . $ - 0.00% No Cost-0% 0% Clerks Other labor to respond to public records request(Idaho Resident) Hours 3&up $ 30.00 $ 39.91 $ 9.91 33.04% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Paper copies of public record information 0-100 pages $ - $ - $ - 0.00% No Cost-0% 0% Clerks Paper copies of public record information 101 or more pages $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Passport Fee Mandatory by Federal agency $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $ - 0.00% State/Fed Controlled 100% Clerks Pawnbroker's license with Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement-New (includes$33.251SP background check fee) $ 63.25 $ 53.75 $ (9.50) -15.02% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Pawnbroker's license with Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement-Renewal $ 30.00 $ 10.25 $ (19.75) -65.84% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Pawnbroker's license without Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement-New (includes$33.251SP background check fee) $ 63.25 $ 53.75 $ (9.50) -15.02% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Pawnbroker's license without Precious Metal Dealer Endorsement-Renewal $ 30.00 $ 10.25 $ (19.75) -65.84% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Precious Metal Dealer License-New (includes$33.251SP background check fee) $ 63.25 $ 76.28 $ 13.03 20.60% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Precious Metal Dealer License-Renewal $ 30.00 $ 32.78 $ 2.78 9.27% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Retail Sales of Non-Aerial Common Fireworks Permit $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Temporary use permit Large-scale Special Event $ 150.00 $ 250.00 $ 100.00 66.67% Minimal Cost-1-49% 34% Clerks Temporary use permit Outdoor Market(in a park) $ 85.00 $ 242.00 $ 157.00 184.71% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Temporary use permit Outdoor Market(not in a park) $ 50.00 $ 217.98 $ 167.98 335.95% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Temporary use permit Promotional Sales Unit $ 65.00 $ 80.75 $ 15.75 24.23% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Temporary use permit Special Event(in a park) $ 85.00 $ 299.00 $ 214.00 251.76% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Temporary use permit Special Event(not in a park) $ 50.00 $ 217.98 $ 167.98 335.95% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Temporary use permit Temporary Sales Unit $ 65.00 $ 80.75 $ 15.75 24.23% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Vehicle Immobilization License Application Fee (includes$33.251SP background check fee) $ 73.25 $ 84.37 $ 11.12 15.18% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Wine License by the drink $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Clerks Wine License retail $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Above Ground Storage Tank Operational Permit $ 85.00 $ 119.76 $ 34.76 40.89% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Compliance Engine Administrative Fee $ 13.05 $ 6.90 $ (6.15) -47.16% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Day Care Inspections $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ - 0.00% Minimal Cost-1-49% 50% Fire Mobile Food Vendor Inspection $ 45.00 $ 59.82 $ 14.82 32.94% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Firework Display Inspection-Inspector/Investigator Per Hour(4 hrs.Minimum) $ 65.00 $ 102.69 $ 37.69 57.99% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire False Alarm(2nd Offense within Calendar Year) $ 65.00 $ 99.15 $ 34.15 52.53% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire False Alarm(3rd Offense within Calendar Year) $ 130.00 $ 198.29 $ 68.29 52.53% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire False Alarm(4th Offense within Calendar Year) $ 195.00 $ 297.44 $ 102.44 52.53% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire False Alarm(Sth Offense within Calendar Year) $ 260.00 $ 396.58 $ 136.58 52.53% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Brush/Squad Per Hour $ 180.57 $ 169.16 $ (11.41) -6.32% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Command/Incident Mangement Per Hour $ 54.75 $ 69.85 $ 15.10 27.59% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire EMT Bike Patrol 2 Person Team Per Hour(4 hrs.Minimum) $ 480.00 $ 447.86 $ (32.14) -6.70% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire EMT Bike Patrol 4 Person Team Per Hour(4 hrs.Minimum) $ 960.00 $ 885.42 $ (74.58) -7.77% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Engine Response Per Hour $ 261.29 $ 169.16 $ (92.13) -35.26% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Tender Response Per Hour $ 190.80 $ 121.74 $ (69.06) -36.19% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Ladder Truck Response Per Hour New $ 216.57 $ 216.57 100.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Fire Extra-Duty Personnel-Captain Fire Inspector Per Hour New $ 102.69 $ 102.69 100.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Accessory use for daycare $ 160.00 $ 244.67 $ 84.67 52.92% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Accessory use for Home Occupation $ 53.00 $ 120.89 $ 67.89 128.09% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Accessory use for Home Occupation that includes provision of lessons or instruction to a group of 7 or more students $ 160.00 $ 169.24 $ 9.24 5.78% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Additional hearing(post reconsideration) $ 692.00 $ 611.40 $ (80.60) -11.65% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Alternative compliance $ 160.00 $ 255.78 $ 95.78 59.86% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Annexation,staff prepared consensual $ 2,086.00 $2,162.64 $ 76.64 3.67% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Annexation/rezone $ 1,826.00 $2,048.70 $ 222.70 12.20% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Annexation/rezone w/out concurrent application $ 2,092.00 $2,048.70 $ (43.30) -2.07% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Certificate of zoning compliance $ 453.00 $ 531.92 $ 78.92 17.42% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Certificate of zoning compliance w/prior approval $ 173.00 $ 340.34 $ 167.34 96.73% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Certificate of Zoning Compliance,use $ 133.00 $ 230.87 $ 97.87 73.59% Full Cost-100% 100% All Fees Department Fee Description Current Fee Proposed Proposed$ Proposed % Recovery Method Recovery Fee Change Change % Planning City council review(appeal) $ 692.00 $ 855.34 $ 163.34 23.60% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Comprehensive plan map amendment $ 2,409.00 $2,125.37 $ (283.63) -11.77% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Comprehensive plan text amendment $ 1,431.00 $1,420.73 $ (10.27) -0.72% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Conditional use minor modification $ 378.00 $ 602.63 $ 224.63 59.43% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Conditional use(or Commission level modification) $ 1,369.00 $1,338.95 $ (30.05) -2.19% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Design review $ 173.00 $ 273.69 $ 100.69 58.20% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Development agreement $ 303.00 $ 611.47 $ 308.47 101.80% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Development agreement modification $ 502.00 $ 912.77 $ 410.77 81.83% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Director determination $ 160.00 $ 294.05 $ 134.05 83.78% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Fence Permit $ 10.00 $ 30.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Inspections,additional $ 53.00 $ 54.74 $ 1.74 3.28% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Miscellaneous hearing item $ 937.00 $ 935.55 $ (1.45) -0.15% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Performance,Warranty and Development of Surety Agreement Fee $ 233.00 $ 374.84 $ 141.84 60.88% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Planned unit development $ 2,001.00 $1,781.48 $ (219.52) -10.97% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Planned unit development,Fire Department Review Fees $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Planned unitdevelopment,Fire Department review per lot fee $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Planned unit development,per exception fee $ 107.00 $ 353.95 $ 246.95 230.79% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,combination $ 2,189.00 $2,289.55 $ 100.55 4.59% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,final $ 1,242.00 $ 691.64 $ (550.36) -44.31% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,final PW fee $ 36.00 $ 145.45 $ 109.45 304.03% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,final,modification to condition $ 541.00 $ 748.04 $ 207.04 38.27% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,preliminary $ 2,104.00 $2,045.94 $ (58.06) -2.76% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,preliminary Fire Department review fee $ 160.00 $ 160.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,preliminary Fire Department review per lot fee $ 1.00 $ 1.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,preliminary per lot P&Z and P&W Flat Fee $ 24.00 $ 727.25 $ 703.25 2930.21% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Plat,short $ 868.00 $ 807.35 $ (60.65) -6.99% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Private road $ 198.00 $ 265.89 $ 67.89 34.29% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Property boundary adjustment $ 365.00 $ 313.82 $ (51.18) -14.02% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Re-notice of a public hearing $ 183.00 $ 378.28 $ 195.28 106.71% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Remand Fee $ 705.00 $ 695.72 $ (9.28) -1.32% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Review of Landscape Plan revisions $ 160.00 $ 169.24 $ 9.24 5.78% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Sign $ 53.00 $ 48.36 $ (4.64) -8.76% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Sign,limited duration $ 27.00 $ 24.18 $ (2.82) -10.45% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Sign,Portable $ 27.00 $ 27.00 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Stand Alone 2 year Warranty Surety Agreement $ 180.00 $ 210.20 $ 30.20 16.78% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Stand-alone Performance Surety,without the preparation of a formal Development Surety Agreement $ 162.00 $ 210.20 $ 48.20 29.76% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Surety Reduction Fee $ 69.00 $ 210.20 $ 141.20 204.64% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Time extension,Commission or Council $ 493.00 $ 636.90 $ 143.90 29.19% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Time extension,Director $ 133.00 $ 276.71 $ 143.71 108.05% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Unified development code text amendment $ 1,723.00 $1,349.13 $ (373.87) -21.70% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Vacations(including recorded plat notes) $ 589.00 $1,101.81 $ 512.81 87.06% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Variance $ 1,056.00 $ 689.14 $ (366.86) -34.74% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Zoning verification letter $ 53.00 $ 120.89 $ 67.89 128.09% Full Cost-100% 100% Planning Use Zone Encroachment Permit $ - $ - $ - 0.00% No Cost-0% 0% Planning Streetscape Sublicense $ - $ - $ - 0.00% No Cost-0% 0% Planning Parklet Permit $ - $ - $ - 0.00% No Cost-0% 0% Police Impound Fee-Dog $ 50.00 $ 145.34 $ 95.34 190.68% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Impound Fee-Livestock $ 150.00 $ 549.41 $ 399.41 266.28% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Impound Fee-Cat $ 15.00 $ . $ (15.00) -100.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Impound Fee-Vicious Dog or Bite Case $ 75.00 $ 161.49 $ 86.49 115.32% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Extra-Duty Personnel-Officer(PO41) $ 54.01 $ 90.21 $ 36.20 67.02% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Extra-Duty Personnel-Supervisor(S2S) $ 60.32 $ 129.17 $ 68.85 114.14% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Non-attorney staff hourly rate to process response to public records request Hours 3&up-per Hour $ 24.67 $ 41.54 $ 16.87 68.39% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Attorney hourly rate to process response to public records request Hours 3&up-per Hour $ 47.70 $ 72.48 $ 24.78 51.95% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Nuisance/weeds abatement administrative fee $ 100.00 $ 186.37 $ 86.37 86.37% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Paper copies of public record information 101 or more pages $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ - 0.00% Full Cost-100% 100% Police Thumb drive with public record information $ 7.50 $ 5.00 $ (2.50) -33.33% Full Cost-100% 100%