Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-09-16 Regular City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, September 16, 2025 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener ABSENT Mayor Robert E. Simison PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted as Amended (Executive Session Vacated) PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics RESOLUTIONS \[Action Item\] 1. Resolution 25-2537: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2026 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services; Authorizing the Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilman Taylor. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ, PP, MDA (H-2025-0016) by Studio H Architects, generally located at the NW corner of E. Pine Ave. and N. Adkins Ave. Remanded to Planning and Zoning Commission A. Request: Rezone of 4.68 acres of land from the R-4 to the R-15 zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 4.68 acres of land from the R4 to the R-15 zoning district, consisting of 30 building lots and 7 common lots. C. Request: Development Agreement Modification to terminate the existing development agreement and establish a new one. Motion to remand to Planning and Zoning Commission made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 3. Public Hearing for Latitude Forty Three Subdivision (H-2024-0059) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at 675, 715 and 955 S. Wells St. Continued to October 14, 2025 A. Request: Annexation of 17.27 acres of land with R-8 (13.78 acres), R-15 (2.42 acres) and C-N (1.07 acres) zoning districts. B. Request: Preliminary Plat to re-subdivide lots 7, 21 and 22, Magic View Subdivision, Amended into 79 residential lots, 1 commercial lot and 11 common/other lots on 15.97 acres of land in the R-8, R-15 and C-N zoning districts. Motion to continue to October 14, 2025 made by Councilman Overton, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener FUTURE MEETING TOPICS EXECUTIVE SESSION 4. Executive session per Idaho Code 74-206(1)(d): To consider records that are exempt from disclosure as provided in chapter 1, title 74, Idaho Code. Vacated ADJOURNMENT 6:10 PM Meridian City Council September 16, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6.00 p.m. Tuesday, September 16, 2025, by Vice-President Liz Strader. Members Present: Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Members Absent: Robert Simison. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Nick Napoli. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock _X_Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X—Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison Strader: Okay. I call the Meridian City Council regular meeting to order. Today is Tuesday, September 16th, 2025. It is 6.00 o'clock p.m. and we will begin this City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Strader: Okay. Everyone, please, join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Strader: Okay. Thank you. I would like to recognize Pastor Vinnie Hanke for the community invocation. Please join us in prayer or take this as a moment of silent reflection. Hanke: Members of the City Council, thank you once again for the opportunities to come and pray for you. God, I thank you for this evening. I thank you for the servants of our city. I pray tonight as they conduct their business that you might grant them wisdom and discernment, that they might execute judgment with justice and righteousness. Father, we pray for our city. Its officials. Its staff. Its public servants. Its teachers and its families. We ask that we might be a lighthouse in the Treasure Valley. We ask that we might be a city in which neighbors love one another, demonstrate kindness and hospitality and generosity to all who would cross our path and we ask these things in the name of Christ, amen. Thank you. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Meridian City Council September 16,2025 Page 2of7 Strader: Thank you, Pastor. Okay. With that we will move on to adoption of the agenda. Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: We have one change to the agenda. We need to vacate the Executive Session at the end and outside of that change I move that we adopt the agenda as published. Whitlock: Second. Strader: Okay. I have a motion and a second to approve the amended agenda. All those in favor, please, signify by saying aye. Opposed? Okay. The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Strader: Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up under public forum? Johnson: Madam Vice-President, yes. Pastor Hanke speaking about a Kleiner Park event. Strader: Okay. Thank you very much, Pastor Hanke. You will be recognized for up to three minutes. If you could, please, state your name and address for the record as well. Hanke: Yeah. My name is Vinny Hanke. We reside at 4034 North Breeze Creek Place in Meridian. I just want to thank the Mayor and the staff and the Parks Department for the event at Kleiner Park this last weekend. The arts festival. My family and I got to participate in the chalk art competition with my two teenage daughters and we just had a great time and so just wanted to express our thanks and enjoyment of the work that the city does and we love living here. That was all. Thank you. Strader: Thank you so much. Hanke: My pleasure. Strader: Okay. All right. And, Mr. Clerk, was there anyone else signed up? Johnson: Madam Vice-President, that was everyone. RESOLUTIONS [Action Item] Meridian City Council September 16,2025 Page 3of7 1. Resolution 25-2537: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2026 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services; Authorizing the Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Strader: Okay. Fantastic. With that we will move on to our Resolutions. First we have Resolution No. 25-2537, resolution adopting the fiscal year 2026 rate schedule of solid waste collection and disposal services, authorizing the Finance Department to collect such fees and providing an effective date. All right. Okay. Council? Overton: Madam Vice-President. Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: I move that we approve Resolution 25-2537. Taylor: Second. Strader: Okay. I have a motion and a second to approve Resolution 25-2537. Is there any discussion? Okay. With that we will go ahead and -- do we need a roll call vote on this? Johnson: Madam Vice-President, I'm not entirely sure, but I'm happy to do one. Strader: Okay. Let's go ahead. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, absent; Whitlock, yea. Strader: Okay. All ayes. The motion carries and Resolution 25-2537 is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Strader: With that we will move on to our Action Items this evening. Just to preview, I think for members of the public, on Item 2 the applicant has requested a remand to the Planning and Zoning Commission and on Item 3 the applicant is requesting a continuance. So, I just wanted to let everybody know that that -- that those requests were made. ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ, PP, MDA (H- 2025-0016) by Studio H Architects, generally located at the NW corner of E. Pine Ave. and N. Adkins Ave. Meridian City Council September 16,2025 Page 4 of 7 A. Request: Rezone of 4.68 acres of land from the R-4 to the R-15 zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 4.68 acres of land from the R-4 to the R-15 zoning district, consisting of 30 building lots and 7 common lots. C. Request: Development Agreement Modification to terminate the existing development agreement and establish a new one. Strader: Okay. So, with that I would like us to go ahead and we will open the public hearing for Item 2, the Farrington Heights Subdivision, H-2025-0016, and I will recognize Nick Napoli to kick us off. Napoli: Good morning, Members of the Council. So, yes, Item 2 for Farrington Heights, the applicant is requesting to be remanded back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission was recommending denial of the project and the applicant would like to make some changes to the plat to better address the neighbors' concerns before bringing it in front of you guys and that does require some revised drawings that would do a new staff report for the Planning and Zoning Commission, which would get a new recommendation, which will, then, be brought before you guys shortly. So, I guess do you have any questions? I will stand for any questions you guys have at this time. Strader: Okay. Thank you very much, Nick. City Council, any questions? Overton: Seems appropriate. Strader: Okay. I have a question. I think it's more of a legal question, but is there -- do we need to keep our public hearing open to go ahead and remand this back? I guess a question for legal counsel, if Emily has a thought. Kane: Madam Vice-President, Members of Council, this -- the public hearing would be closed and, then, the Planning and Zoning Commission would take it from there. Strader: Okay. All right. Fantastic. I think we understand the order of operations that we are going in. All right. Council? Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: I move that we close the public hearing for Farrington Heights Subdivision, H- 2025-0016. Little Roberts: Second. Meridian City Council September 16,2025 Page 5of7 Strader: Okay. I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 2. Is there any discussion? Okay. All right. Hearing none, all in favor signify by saying aye. Okay. Opposed nay? Okay. The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: Madam Vice-President, I move that we remand Farrington Heights Subdivision, H-2025-0016, back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant needs to address concerns of neighbors and being revised it will come back to the City Council at a future date, undetermined at this time. Little Roberts: Second. Strader: Okay. We have a motion and a second to remand H-2025-0016 back to the Planning and Zoning Commission. I will ask the clerk to call roll on that vote. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Strader: Okay. All ayes and the motion carries and that item has been remanded back to Planning and Zoning. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 3. Public Hearing for Latitude Forty Three Subdivision (H-2024-0059) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at 675, 715 and 955 S. Wells St. A. Request: Annexation of 17.27 acres of land with R-8 (13.78 acres), R-15 (2.42 acres) and C-N (1 .07 acres) zoning districts. B. Request: Preliminary Plat to re-subdivide lots 7, 21 and 22, Magic View Subdivision, Amended into 79 residential lots, 1 commercial lot and 11 common/other lots on 15.97 acres of land in the R-8, R- 15 and C-N zoning districts. Strader: With that we will move on to Item 3, a public hearing for Latitude Forty Three Subdivision, H-2024-0059, and we will go ahead and turn this over to Nick again for staff comments. Napoli: Madam Vice-President, Members of the Council, so, yes, Latitude Forty Three is requesting a continuance and also requires a continuance. They are requesting it to be October 14th in order to allow for additional time to obtain information resolving traffic circulation issues in the area. So, I will stand for any questions you guys have. Meridian City Council September 16,2025 Page 6 of 7 Strader: A quick question. It sounds like this is actually a required continuance. Is that accurate, just in terms of noticing and the requirements being met for a public hearing? Napoli: Madam Vice-President, that is correct. Strader: Okay So, with that I would love to entertain a motion for continuance. Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: I move that we continue Latitude Forty Three Subdivision, project H-2024- 0059, until October 14th. Little Roberts: Second. Strader: Okay. We have a motion and a second to continue Item 3 to October 14th. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? Okay. The ayes have it and the item is continued. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Strader: With that we will move on to Future Meeting Topics. Does anyone have a future meeting topic that they would like to propose? Council President Cavener, we don't want to leave you out, since you are virtual. Cavener: I'm good. Thank you. Strader: All right. Not a lot tonight. So, with that we vacated our Executive Session. I will entertain a motion to adjourn the meeting. Overton: Madam Vice-President? Strader: Councilman Overton. Overton: Move that we adjourn. Little Roberts: Second. Strader: Okay. Great. I have a motion and a second to adjourn the meeting. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed? Okay. The ayes have it and we are adjourned. Cavener: Council Vice-President, exceptional job. Appreciate you holding the fort. Meridian City Council September 16,2025 Page 7of7 MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.10 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) Robert E. Simison, Mayor 10-14-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 10-14-2025 E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: September 16, 2025 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic jen� ��tc Vyaep,l E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 25-2537: A Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2026 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services; Authorizing the Finance Department to Collect Such Fees; and Providing an Effective Date Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: C�w IDIAN� Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader,Vice President Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts TO: Mayor Robert Simison Members of the City Council FROM: Sayard Schultz Solid Waste Coordinator, Public Works Dept. DATE: 09/09/2025 SUBJECT: Approval of Republic Services FY26 Rate Resolution and Household Hazardous Waste Billing Changes REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: 09/16/2025 I. RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of; a) Resolution 25-2537, Adopting FY26 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Public Works Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 200,Meridian,ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5500 . www.meridiancity.org CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2537 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR, WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES; AUTHORIZING FINANCE DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT SUCH FEES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 21 of the City's solid waste franchise agreement with Republic Services, Inc., originally entered into on January 18, 2000, and approved by City Council Resolution no. 285,providing for annual review of rates and charges for services provided, Republic Services identified necessary updates to the solid waste collection fee schedule and presented proposed changes to the Solid Waste Advisory Commission and to the Meridian City Council; and WHEREAS,the household hazardous waste collection service fee that has previously been collected by Republic Services as part of the residential solid waste collection fee will now be collected separately by Meridian Utility Billing Services, and thus will be listed as a new line item fee; WHEREAS,the Solid Waste Advisory Commission and Public Works Department staff recommend that the City Council adopt the FY26 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Idaho Code section 63-1311A, following publication of notice and public hearing,the City Council of Meridian did,by formal motion, approve the FY26 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That the FY26 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. Section 2. That, as of its effective date, the FY26 Rate Schedule of Solid Waste Collection Services, as set forth in Exhibit A,will supersede all previous solid waste collection fees and fee schedules previously adopted. Section 3. That the Finance Department of the City of Meridian is hereby authorized to implement and carry out the collection of fees as set forth in Exhibit A. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect on October 1, 2025. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho,this 16th day of September, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho,this 16th day of September, 2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADOPTION OF FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 1 EXHIBIT A FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES Service Type Description Current Proposed Fee Fee RESIDENTIAL TRASH AND RECYCLING Residential 95 gallon service(includes 1 recycling cart) $25.06 $26.36 Residential 65 gallon service(includes 1 recycling cart) $22.39 $23.56 Residential 48 gallon service(includes 1 recycling cart) $19.74 $20.80 Residential Extra Carts(per cart per month) $3.03 $3.20 Residential Cart Pickup/Upsize Exchange fee(per event) $17.86 $18.83 Residential Cart Delivery(free) $0.00 $0.00 Residential Carry Out Service $42.07 $44.37 COMMERCIAL PERMANENT TRASH Commercial Trash Delivery Charge $13.56 $14.30 Commercial Trash 1,95 gallon cart(1 x per week) $39.02 $41.09 Commercial Trash 1,95 gallon cart(2 x per week) $73.78 $77.71 Commercial Trash 1,95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $108.51 $114.27 Commercial Trash 2,95 gallon cart(1 x per week) $78.11 $82.25 Commercial Trash 2,95 gallon cart(2 x per week) $147.63 $155.45 Commercial Trash 2,95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $217.07 $228.57 Commercial Trash 3,95 gallon cart(1 x per week) $117.16 $123.39 Commercial Trash 3,95 gallon cart(2 x per week) $221.44 $233.20 Commercial Trash 3,95 gallon cart(3 x per week) $325.60 $342.87 Commercial Trash Container Delivery Svc(2,3,6,8 yd options) $30.92 $32.61 Commercial Trash Lid Lock Installation(2,3,6,8 yd options) $57.64 $60.79 Commercial Trash Monthly Lock Service(2,3,6,8 yd options) $16.62 $17.53 Commercial Trash 2 yd(Extra Dump) $31.69 $33.36 Commercial Trash 3 yd(Extra Dump) $43.12 $45.39 Commercial Trash 6 yd(Extra Dump) $62.59 $65.86 Commercial Trash 8 yd(Extra Dump) $80.51 $84.69 Commercial Trash 2 yd(lx per week) $129.45 $136.28 Commercial Trash 2 yd(2x per week) $184.57 $194.18 Commercial Trash 2 yd(3x per week) $238.73 $251.07 Commercial Trash 2 yd(4x per week) $320.28 $336.83 Commercial Trash 2 yd(5 x per week) $401.65 $422.41 Commercial Trash 2 yd(6 x per week) $483.09 $508.07 Commercial Trash 3 yd(lx per week) $134.45 $141.45 Commercial Trash 3 yd(2 x per week) $217.36 $228.54 Commercial Trash 3 yd(3 x per week) $300.42 $315.77 Commercial Trash 3 yd(4 x per week) $395.79 $415.99 Commercial Trash 3 yd(5 x per week) $520.60 $547.27 Commercial Trash 3 yd(6 x per week) $630.73 $663.07 Commercial Trash 6 yd(1 x per week) $209.31 $220.04 Commercial Trash 6 yd(2 x per week) $337.27 $354.27 Commercial Trash 6 yd(3 x per week) $465.10 $488.39 ADOPTION OF FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES Commercial Trash 6 yd(4 x per week) $620.16 $651.22 Commercial Trash 6 yd(5 x per week) $775.31 $814.14 Commercial Trash 6 yd(6 x per week) $930.37 $976.95 Commercial Trash 8 yd(1 x per week) $248.16 $260.78 Commercial Trash 8 yd(2 x per week) $384.74 $403.89 Commercial Trash 8 yd(3 x per week) $519.80 $545.39 Commercial Trash 8 yd(4 x per week) $672.30 $705.27 Commercial Trash 8 yd(5 x per week) $834.80 $875.70 Commercial Trash 8 yd(6 x per week) $990.05 $1,038.50 Commercial Trash Compactors 2 yd (base price per pickup per week) $76.61 $80.56 Commercial Trash Compactors 3 yd (base price per pickup per week) $106.00 $111.44 Commercial Trash Compactors 4 yd (base price per pickup per week) $135.92 $142.87 Commercial Trash Compactors 5 yd (base price per pickup per week) $165.90 $174.37 Commercial Trash Compactors 6 yd (base price per pickup per week) $195.08 $205.03 Commercial Trash Compactors 8 yd (base price per pickup per week) $261.94 $275.31 COMMERCIAL ON-CALL TRASH Commercial On-Call Service 3 yd Haul Svc(Municipal Solid Waste) $53.33 $55.88 Commercial On-Call Service 3 yd Haul Svc(Construction and Demolition) $144.58 $152.12 Commercial On-Call Service 3 yd(Monthly Rent) $32.17 $33.93 Commercial On-Call Service 3 yd(Daily Rent) $1.06 $1.11 COMMERCIAL RECYCLING Commercial Commingled Container Delivery Charge(3,5,6,8 yd options) $30.92 $32.61 Recyclable Collection Commercial Commingled 3 yd(Extra Dump) $22.57 $23.82 Recyclable Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 3 yd(Every Other Week) $65.98 $69.62 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 3 yd(1 x week) $83.03 $87.64 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 3 yd(2 x week) $146.80 $154.96 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 3 yd(3 x week) $210.61 $222.33 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 3 yd(4 x week) $274.40 $289.67 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 3 yd(5 x week) $338.17 $356.99 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 5 yd(Extra Dump) $30.80 $32.51 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 5 yd(Every Other Week) $90.91 $95.92 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 5 yd(1 x week) $126.70 $133.73 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 5 yd(2 x week) $213.49 $225.39 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 5 yd(3 x week) $299.70 $316.42 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 5 yd(4 x week) $386.18 $407.74 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 5 yd(5 x week) $467.87 $494.01 Collection ADOPTION OF FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES Commercial Commingled Recyclable 6 yd(Extra Dump) $37.44 $39.52 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 6 yd(Every Other Week) $107.82 $113.77 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 6 yd(1 x week) $134.91 $142.41 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 6 yd(2 x week) $241.65 $255.13 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 6 yd(3 x week) $348.37 $367.82 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 6 yd(4 x week) $455.07 $480.49 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 6 yd(5 x week) $561.71 $593.10 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 8 yd(Extra Dump) $51.14 $53.98 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 8 yd(Every Other Week) $128.15 $135.25 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 8 yd(1 x week) $161.58 $170.59 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 8 yd(2 x week) $294.44 $310.91 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 8 yd(3 x week) $427.16 $451.05 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 8 yd(4 x week) $559.93 $591.26 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 8 yd(5 x week) $695.04 $733.94 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 95 gallon carts(1 cart/week) $17.33 $18.29 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 95 gallon carts(2 cart/week) $27.60 $29.12 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 95 gallon carts(3 cart/week) $37.85 $39.95 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 95 gallon carts(4 cart/week) $48.12 $50.80 Collection Commercial Commingled Recyclable 95 gallon carts(5 cart/week) $58.35 $61.61 Collection INDUSTRIAL TRASH Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 6- 10 yd $31.25 $32.96 Industrial Trash 6- 10 yd containers(Haul Svc) $139.44 $147.05 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee(Municipal Solid Waste) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 6 yd Disposal Fee(C&D/Compacted) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 6 yd(Monthly Rent) $68.37 $72.10 Industrial Trash 6 yd(Daily Rent) $2.26 $2.39 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee(Municipal Solid Waste) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 8 yd Disposal Fee(C&D/Compacted) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 8 yd(Monthly Rent) $88.63 $93.46 Industrial Trash 8 yd(Daily Rent) $2.92 $3.07 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee(Municipal Solid Waste) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 10 yd Disposal Fee(C&D/Compacted) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 10 yd(Monthly Rent) $98.76 $104.16 Industrial Trash 10 yd(Daily Rent) $3.23 $3.41 Industrial Trash Container Delivery Svc 20-40 yd $31.25 $32.96 ADOPTION OF FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES Industrial Trash/Diversion/Recycling 20-40 yd screen lid $49.72 $52.44 Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers(Haul Svc) $452.86 $477.58 Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers(Haul Svc for Asbestos-Ada $393.06 $414.52 County) Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers(Certification fee Asbestos - $25.73 $26.53 Ada County) Industrial Trash 20-40 yd containers(Haul Svc for Asbestos- $393.06 $414.52 Idaho Waste Systems) Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee(Municipal Solid Waste) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee(C&D/Compacted) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee(Asbestos-Ada County $33.92 $34.98 Landfill Industrial Trash 20 yd Disposal Fee(Asbestos-Idaho Waste $882.76 $910.35 Systems) Industrial Trash 20 yd(Monthly Rent) $113.56 $119.76 Industrial Trash 20yd(Daily Rent) $3.74 $3.94 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee(Municipal Solid Waste) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee(C&D/Compacted) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee(Asbestos-Ada County $33.92 $34.98 Landfill) Industrial Trash 30 yd Disposal Fee(Asbestos-Idaho Waste $1,324.1 $1,365.52 Systems) 4 Industrial Trash 30 yd(Monthly Rent) $138.79 $146.36 Industrial Trash 30 yd(Daily Rent) $4.56 $4.80 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee(Municipal Solid Waste) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee(C&D/Compacted) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 40 yd Disposal Fee(Asbestos-Ada County $33.92 $34.98 Landfill) Industrial Trash 40 yd disposal Fee(Asbestos-Idaho Waste $1,765.5 $1,820.69 Systems) 2 Industrial Trash 40 yd(Monthly Rent) $158.61 $167.27 Industrial Trash 40 yd(Daily Rent) $5.20 $5.49 Industrial Trash 20yd compactor Disposal Fee $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 25yd compactor Disposal Fee $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 30yd compactor Disposal Fee $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Trash 40yd compactor Disposal Fee $33.92 $34.98 INDUSTRIAL DIVERSION Industrial Diversion Container Delivery Svc 6- 10 yd $31.25 $32.96 Industrial Diversion 6-8 yd containers(Haul Svc) $77.23 $81.45 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee(Wood) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee(Sheetrock) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 6 yd Disposal Fee(Clean Rock,Gravel,etc.) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee(Wood) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee(Sheetrock) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 8 yd Disposal Fee(Clean Rock,Gravel,etc.) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee(Wood) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee(Sheetrock) $33.92 $34.98 ADOPTION OF FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 5 EXHIBIT A FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES Industrial Diversion 10 yd Disposal Fee(Clean Rock,Gravel,etc.) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion Container Delivery Svc 20-40 yd $31.25 $32.96 Industrial Diversion 20-40 yd Wood,Sheetrock,Clean Rock $174.78 $184.32 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee(Wood) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee(Sheetrock) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 20 yd Disposal Fee(Clean Rock,Gravel,etc.) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee(Wood) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee(Sheetrock) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 30 yd Disposal Fee(Clean Rock,Gravel,etc.) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee(Wood) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee(Sheetrock) $33.92 $34.98 Industrial Diversion 40 yd Disposal Fee(Clean Rock,Gravel,etc.) $33.92 $34.98 INDUSTRIAL RECYCLING Industrial Recycling Processing per loose yard(as applicable) $1.32 $1.40 Industrial Recycling Processing per compact yard(as applicable) $2.65 $2.80 Industrial Recycling Container Delivery Svc 6- 10 yd $31.25 $32.96 Industrial Recycling 6- 10 yd containers(Haul Svc) $77.23 $81.45 Industrial Recycling 6 yd(Monthly Rent) $68.37 $72.10 Industrial Recycling 6 yd(Daily Rent) $2.26 $2.39 Industrial Recycling 8 yd(Monthly Rent) $88.63 $93.46 Industrial Recycling 8yd(Daily Rent) $2.92 $3.07 Industrial Recycling 10 yd(Monthly Rent) $98.76 $104.16 Industrial Recycling 10 yd(Daily Rent) $3.26 $3.45 Industrial Recycling Contain Deliver Svc 20-40 yd $31.25 $32.96 Industrial Recycling 20-40 yd containers(Haul Svc) $174.77 $184.31 Industrial Recycling 20 yd(Monthly Rent) $113.56 $119.76 Industrial Recycling 20 yd(Daily Rent) $3.74 $3.94 Industrial Recycling 30 yd(Monthly Rent) $138.79 $146.36 Industrial Recycling 30 yd(Daily Rent) $4.56 $4.80 Industrial Recycling 40 yd(Monthly Rent) $158.61 $167.27 Industrial Recycling 40 yd(Daily Rent) $5.20 $5.49 Industrial Recycling 15 -40 yd Compactors(Haul Svc) $174.77 $184.31 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Miscellaneous Collection Refrigerant-containing units/appliances $70.91 $74.78 Miscellaneous Collection Non-Refrigerant units/appliances $20.11 $21.21 Miscellaneous Collection Special Collection(for each increment of 10 $28.42 $29.97 minutes) Miscellaneous Collection Bulky Item Pickup(per item) $20.31 $21.42 Miscellaneous Collection Extra Pickup/Go Back(per occurrence) $14.46 $15.24 Miscellaneous Collection Relocation(all sizes)-Commercial/Industrial $31.25 $32.96 Industrial Services Turnaround compactor fee-Commercial/Industrial $21.92 $23.12 Miscellaneous Collection Weekend Charge-Industrial $88.72 $93.56 Miscellaneous Collection Pressure Wash-Industrial $261.56 $275.84 ADOPTION OF FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES Industrial&Commercial Dry Run-Industrial&commercial containers, $133.16 $140.43 compactors Miscellaneous Collection Commercial Combo Lock Replacement $37.27 $39.30 Commercial Container Extra Yardage Occurrence $29.88 $31.51 UTILITY BILLING Household Hazardous Waste Monthly fee,previously integrated with household $0.24 $0.21 Collection Service trash and recycling service fee and paid from City to franchisee to vendor;now listed separately on utility bill and paid from City directly to vendor. ADOPTION OF FY26 RATE SCHEDULE OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES PAGE 7 W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ, PP, MDA (H-2025- 0016) by Studio H Architects, generally located at the NW corner of E. Pine Ave. and N. Adkins Ave. Applicant Requests Remand to Planning and Zoning Commission A. Request: Rezone of 4.68 acres of land from the R-4 to the R-15 zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 4.68 acres of land from the R4 to the R-15 zoning district, consisting of 30 building lots and 7 common lots. C. Request: Development Agreement Modification to terminate the existing development agreement and establish a new one. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C` fE IDIAN -- DEPARTMENT REPORT A"o HEARING 9/16/2025 Legend Wm DATE: 0 Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council ;:: area of impact �= City Limits FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 m nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Jessica Heggie - SUBJECT: H-2025-0016 1 Farrington Heights Subdivision RZ,PP, - MDA LOCATION: Generally located at the northwest corner -=1 __ .__f-, of E. Pine Avenue and N.Adkins Avenue in the SE corner of the SE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 7,T.2N.,R2W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Rezone from the R-4 to the R-15 zoning district; Preliminary Plat consisting of 30 building lots and 7 common lots on 4.68 acres of land, and a development agreement modification to replace the current development agreement with a new one. B. Issues/Waiver: The applicant is requesting to be remanded to the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow for modifications to address the concerns of the neighbors. The development does not require open space due to the subdivision being under five(5) acres in size and there is no regional park in the area for residents to recreate at. Staff has discussed this concern with the applicant and has suggested larger lots or incorporating some open space,but the applicant has chosen to move forward.Given the proposed density of the subdivision,staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council thoughtfully consider whether a project of this scale and intensity is appropriate in the absence of any dedicated open space or community amenities. C. Recommendation Staff: Approval with a Development Agreement and Conditions Commission: Denial D. Decision Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing Zoning R-4 VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning R-15 Adopted FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 12/10/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 2/10/2025 Site posting date 9/8/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District iV.0 • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Adkins Avenue: Local Street - • Traffic Level of Service ACHD does not have traffic counts available for Pine and - Adkins ITD Comments Received Yes - Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Sewer Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Water Available at Site • Impacts or Concerns No School District(s) No Comments - Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received or see the public record. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure l: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:R2039261221 Date Retrieved:2025/4/3 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infiii Indicator: 1,223 Surrounding Area 154 8% Not City ® City Limits 1,669. 4P 2,572 4 ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:16.8°I° Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 43% 33% 23% Multi-family 57 44% ® Commercial 2.00 2,000 Single-family y Residential 1.50 1,500 41 Parcel Diversity a 1.00 1,000 U ;, 0.82 0Parcel Count (.n 0.50 500 L a.1a a Average Acres 0.00 0 R-2 R-4 3 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 dResidential Net Density 10.00 i)9.68 p 5.00 0 5.33 5.53 6,10 0.00 M 1.23 Dwelling Units 1 Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour (VPH} Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service ` Pine Avenue 314-feet Minor Arterial NIA NIA Adkins Avenue 648-feet Local NIA NIA ` Acceptable level of service for a three-lane minor arterial is "E" (7 0 VPH)_ ACHO does not set level of service thresholds for local streets. Fieure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService ■ ■ Ready fi Caution \`o N � �a�� �i\�e 00 0 City of Meridian Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview This property is designated Medium Density Residential on the City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The medium-density residential designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three(3)to eight(8)dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school,or land dedicated for public services. The applicant proposes to rezone 4.68 acres of land from the R-4 zoning district to the R-15 zoning district. A preliminary plat and conceptual building elevations were submitted showing how the property is proposed to be subdivided and developed with thirty(30)residential building lots and seven(7)commons lots at a gross density of 5.77 units per acre. The proposed use and density are consistent with the Medium Density Residential(MDR)FLUM designation of three (3)to eight(8)units per acre. Additionally,the applicant is proposing a development agreement modification to terminate the existing development agreement(DA)and create a new one. The R-15 zoning designation,which allows for reduced lot sizes down to 2,000 square feet, provides flexibility for developers to support a diversity and variety of housing types. This can create a dynamic,multi-generational community where residents can transition through different stages of life(known as aging in place)while remaining in the same neighborhood. This type of zoning in conjunction with other designations, should be used to support a diverse housing mix that supports long-term residency and continuity within the community,promoting stability and a sense of place for residents throughout different stages of life. The surrounding landscape consists of single-family detached homes to the east,west,and north, while to the south is Pine Avenue. The average density for a one-mile radius is 6.1 units per acre, which is higher than the 5.77 units per acre the applicant is proposing. Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principally permitted use in the R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11- 2A-2. The applicant is proposing to keep the three(3) existing homes on the property and will configure new lot lines around the existing homes that conform to the dimensional standards. In addition to this,the applicant is proposing to complete the subdivision in a single phase. Future development is subject to the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. The property is already annexed with the R-4 zoning. The City may require a development agreement(DA)in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-651IA. If this property is annexed, Staff recommends a DA is required with the provisions discussed herein and included in Section IV. Overall,the proposed infill development is an allowed use within the Medium Density Residential designation and contributes to the area's intended mix of residential housing types. Therefore, staff is supportive of the proposed development with the conditions and DA listed in Section IV. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.02.02C: Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in Downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development. Staff encouraged the applicant to converse with the neighbor early on in the process, and after their neighborhood meeting,the applicant indicated the neighbors had minimal concerns. With this knowledge, staff is supportive of the infill development but still have concerns with the lack of regional parks in the area for residents to access and use. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.02.OID:Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis The applicant will be extending the sidewalk along the west side of N. Adkins Avenue to connect with the northern subdivision,which will improve the walkability in the neighborhood. However, there is still an Ada County parcel that will leave a gap in the sidewalk. Once the Ada County parcel annexes into the city,the sidewalk will be completed along the west side of Adkins. Comprehensive Plan Policy 6.01.02B:Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity. The applicant will be eliminating three access points to E. Pine Avenue,which will decrease the number of curb cuts on an increasingly busier arterial roadway. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.02.00:Plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. Open space and amenities are not required by the UDC since the development is five (5)acres or less. However, staff has concerns with the lack of opportunities for outdoor recreation for residents in this area as there is no regional park nearby. Staff would like the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council to carefully consider if open space and amenities shall be incorporated into the design of the infill project. Table 4: Project Overview Description Details History AZ-00-012;DA Inst# 101052483 Phasing Plan 1 Phase Residential Units 27 new single-family detached 3 existing single-family detached Open Space None;The development is less than 5 acres Amenities None;The development is less than 5 acres Acreage 4.68 acres Lots 30 Buildable Lots and 3 Common Lots Density Gross: 5.77 Units/Acre Net: 7.61 Units/Acre B. History The subject properties were annexed in 2000 as a part of Farrington, Opal application(AZ-00- 012). The zoning granted at the time of annexation was the R-4 zoning district. With the annexation approval,the properties were subject to a DA that restrict the property to adding one additional home on the 4.68 acres. The existing DA will be replaced with a new DA to update the concept plan and provisions to improvements relevant to the current proposal. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The subject site contains three(3) existing homes that will be remaining with the formation of the subdivision. These homes will be included in southern portion of the development and shall conform to the dimensional standards listed UDC Tables 11-2A-5 and 11-2A-7. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant is proposing single-family detached homes (27 new and 3 existing),which are listed as a principal permitted use in UDC Table 11-2A-2 for the R-15 zoning district. In addition to this,the proposed gross density of the subdivision is 5.77 units per acre,which is less than the one-mile radius average density of 6.1 units per acre. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis However, due to the size of Lots 20,21, 22, and 23, staff recommends that the southern portion of the site retain the R-4 zoning designation, as it is more appropriate for the existing lot sizes. The applicant shall submit a revised legal description and exhibit for the rezone prior to the City Council hearing. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 G states development should avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.06.02D encourages a diversity of housing, recreation, and mobility options to attract and sustain the local workforce. The applicant is proposing a total of 30 detached single-family homes,which is consistent with what has been approved in the surrounding subdivisions. However,the lot sizes in this development are smaller than the neighboring subdivisions. There is approximately a two to one(2:1)transition to the adjacent subdivisions,which provides a smaller housing product into the area. As noted above,the neighbors were supportive of the proposed transition. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. The proposed plat complies with the dimensional standards of the R-15 zoning district. If the southern portion of the site remains zoned R-4, the subdivision also appears to meet the dimensional requirements for that district. However, the applicant must verify that Lots 21 and 23, Block 1, meet the required garage and living space setbacks, given that Adkins Avenue will be improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and the lot lines are being adjusted. An exhibit demonstrating compliance with these setback standards must be submitted with the final plat application/. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Goals 2.01.02D,2.01.01 G,and 2.02.02C of the Comprehensive Plan emphasize the importance of offering diverse housing types throughout Meridian to accommodate the needs, preferences, and financial capacities of current and future residents. These goals also support infill development that complements existing neighborhoods. The subject site is adjacent to established R-8 subdivisions—Danbury Fair Subdivision Nos. 1 and 7,and Maws Add No. 3—to the east,north, and west. The applicant submitted a preliminary plat and conceptual building elevations proposing 30 single-family detached dwellings at a gross density of 5.77 units per acre(see Section VII.G). This density aligns with the Medium Density Residential(MDR)Future Land Use Map(FLUM) designation. Although the proposed subdivision does not provide a one-to-one lot size transition with the adjacent neighborhoods,the inclusion of various lot sizes will help diversify the housing stock in the area and citywide. A county enclave parcel remains to the north along N.Adkins Avenue,which will result in a persistent gap in the sidewalk network. The property is contiguous to annexed City land to the north and lies within the City's Area of City Impact.A legal description and exhibit map of the proposed R-15 rezone area are included in Section VII. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6511A,the City may require a City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis development agreement(DA)with annexation. Staff recommends that a DA be required, incorporating the provisions outlined herein and in Section IV. 2. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3G): UDC Section 11-3G-2 requires common open space and amenities for developments that are five(5) acres or larger. The proposed development, at 4.68 acres,falls below this threshold and is therefore not subject to the open space and amenity requirements outlined in the code. However, staff have engaged in multiple discussions with the applicant regarding the value of including open space and amenities, especially given the absence of a regional park in the surrounding area. While not a code requirement, staff are concerned about the lack of recreational space or amenities for future residents. Therefore, staff is recommending one(1) amenity in the form of a picnic area in Lot 19, Block 1. Additionally, Comprehensive Plan Goal 2.02.00 emphasizes the importance of planning for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that offer ample open space and diverse amenities to support a variety of lifestyles. Given the proposed density of the subdivision,staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council thoughtfully consider whether a project of this scale and intensity is appropriate in the absence of any dedicated open space or community amenities. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets UDC 11-2A-7 requires a twenty-five(25) foot wide landscape buffer along E. Pine Avenue, an arterial roadway. A landscape buffer is not required along N. Adkins Avenue, a local street;however, a 10-foot setback to the living space is required from the back of the sidewalk. The applicant has provided a twenty-five(25)foot wide landscape buffer along E. Pine Avenue and is required to comply with the dimensional standards for the R-15 district. With the submittal of the final plat, the applicant shall provide vegetation coverage calculations. ii. Tree preservation Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two(2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. The applicant shall provide mitigation calculations with submittal of the final plat if any trees are being removed from the property. iii. Storm integration Per UDC 11-3B-11,the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural, effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated,well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis stormwater facilities into required landscape areas,where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. iv. Pathway landscaping No new pathway is being proposed as the existing attached ten(10)foot multi-use along E. Pine Avenue is going to remain. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. On-street parking is also available on portions of the proposed streets. Lot 23 will be taking access off Adkins Avenue. The applicant shall submit an exhibit showing the garage and street setback to the property in compliance with the standards. Lot 23 has an existing home that shall have the necessary twenty(20)foot garage setback and fifteen (15)foot living setback. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): Goal 5.01.02D of the Comprehensive Plan highlights the need for effective building design and landscaping to buffer, screen,beautify,and integrate commercial,multifamily,and parking areas with existing neighborhoods. In response,the developer has submitted two(2) conceptual building elevations that illustrate the appearance of future homes in the development(see Section VII). The proposed designs include variations of two-story homes, each featuring a two-car garage. The elevations showcase a range of architectural styles and design elements, including lap siding,neutral color accents,brick and stone veneer,varied roof profiles, and different home styles. Staff review confirms that these elevations adhere to the city's architectural standards and comply with the required design criteria. Homes on lots that abut W.Pine Avenue, an arterial street,-will be highly visible;therefore, the rear and/or side of structures on these lots (i.e. Lots 20,21, and 23,Block 1 ) should incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story and existing structures are exempt from this requirement. 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. According to the submitted landscape plans,the applicant is proposing two types of fencing throughout the site, six(6) foot solid vinyl fencing and a four(4) foot wrought iron semi-privacy fencing. In addition,the applicant shall indicate the fencing location on the residential lots with the submittal of the building permits. These will be required to comply with UDC 11-3A-7. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Goals 6.01.01H and 6.01.02B of the Comprehensive Plan stress the need to minimize the number of direct access points onto arterial streets. This can be achieved through cross-access agreements, access management, frontage and backage roads,and enhancing connectivity City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis through local and collector streets. Additionally,these goals highlight the importance of incorporating pedestrian access connectors in new developments to link subdivisions and support neighborhood connectivity within a community pathway system. Access to the property is proposed from N. Adkins Avenue,a local roadway on the eastern portion of the site. This local road is a shared drive between the proposed subdivision and the existing subdivision to the east and north. The applicant is proposing two(2) access points off N. Adkins Avenue with a common drive accessing the three(3)properties on the southern portion of the site and a common drive accessing three (3)properties on the northern portion of the site. 2. Multiuse Pathways and Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5, Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): Comprehensive Plan policy 4.04.01A ensures that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system. UDC 11-3G-5 emphasizes the importance of common open space and amenities being located in areas that maximize pedestrian and bicycle connectivity. Multi-use pathways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan,the Meridian Pathways Master Plan,the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. The standards along Arterial roadways are to provide a detached ten(10) foot wide sidewalks (multiuse pathway),however, in conversation with the parks department, it was determined the existing ten(10) foot attached multi-use pathway will be sufficient due to it being relatively new. The applicant is in compliance with this, as the ten(10)foot sidewalk already exists along E. Pine Avenue. 3. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17.A sidewalk connection along the west side of N. Adkins Avenue is required to be installed to connect the existing subdivision to the multi-use pathway along E. Pine Avenue. The applicant is depicting the sidewalk on the landscape plan in compliance with this standard. The applicant shall provide a street section exhibit with the submittal of the final plat reflecting compliance with these standards. With the construction of the sidewalk along the western side of Adkins,the sidewalk will extend to the north and stub at the lone remaining Ada County parcel. The sidewalk will be completed when the Ada County parcel annexes in the future. 4. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Dead end streets The proposed subdivision does not contain a dead end street other than the two(2) common drives as discussed below. ii. Common driveways Per UDC 11-6C-3D, common driveways shall serve a maximum of four(4) dwelling units. In no case shall more than three(3)dwelling units be located on one(1) side of the driveway unless alternative compliance is applied for. The applicant is proposing two (2) common drives in the development in which the northern one services three (3) homes and the southern one services three (3) homes. Both appear to be in compliance with the UDC 11-6C-3D. The applicant worked with staff to modify the common drives to provide the five (5)feet of landscaping required in the UDC 11-6.Additionally, the applicant has provided City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis details into where the curb cuts for Lots 20, 21, and 22 will taking access from on the southern common drive. iii. Block face UDC 11-6C-3-regulates block lengths for residential subdivisions. The intent of this section of code is to ensure block lengths do not exceed 750 ft, although there is the allowance of an increase in block length to 1,000 feet if a pedestrian connection is provided. In no case shall a block face exceed one thousand two hundred(1,200)feet, unless waived by the City Council. The applicant is compliance with the block length requirements in the UDC. F. Services Analysis I. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): The existing irrigation ditches on the property shall be piped or tiled in accordance with UDC 11-3A-6. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-I S): An underground pressurized irrigation system is required to be installed to provide irrigation to each lot in the subdivision in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow the best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC I I-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. All utilities are available to the site. Water main, fire hydrant and water service require a twenty- foot(20)wide easement that extends ten(10)feet past the end of main,hydrant, or water meter.No permanent structures, including trees, are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G require urban infrastructure to be provided for all new developments,including curb and gutter, sidewalks,water and sewer utilities. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division The Planning and Zoning Commission is recommendiniz denial of the application, and the following conditions have been struck as a result of the recommendation. 1. A DevelepmepA Agreement(DA) is t:e"it:ed as a provision of rezone of this pr-epef�y. P to appr-eval of the r-ezene or-dinanee, a DA shall be epAefed into between the City of Meridian,- the pr-epeFty aA%er-(s) a�the time of aimexa4ien or-dina-nee adoption, a-ad the developer-. A final plat shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by-0ty Council. Guffen4ly, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applieant to the Planning Division prior-to Planning Division within six(6)meffths of the City Getmeil granting the amexation. The DA City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions fate the folio ..s IF-City Gouneil detet:mifleS FeZE)fle is n the best rote.--Pest offThe southeFn portion of the 0 � site,Prior to City Council, The Applicant Shall Provide the FollowiW. > plat,and 24 shall be zoned R 4 instead of R 15, as these lots are SigHffieaHtly lftFgeF than the OHeS OH the HOFth portion of the site.A revised rezone legal description and exhibit shall be submitted prior-to the City Couneil HeffiHg. a. Futufe development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary landseape plan, eomman open spaee,lsite amenity&Ehibit, and eeneeptual building zn elevations included in Section VIN and the provisions eontained herein. b. Any ftAttfe development 4the site mtist eemply with the City of Mer-idian aFdina-nees in eg2et at the time E)f the development, e. The southem portion of the site, consisting of Lots 20,21, 22, 23, and 24 shall be zone R 4 instead of R 15, as these lots afe signifieantly larger-than the ones Ew the aei4h f the site. A Fevised rezone legal deser-iption and exhibit shall be submitted prior- to the City Couneil l4ear-ing. d—Homes ofl lots that abut W. PineAventie, an aAer-ial str-ee be highly therefore,the Feaf and/or-side of stfuetwes on these lots (i.e. Lots 20,21, and 23,Block modulation(e.g. pr-oje I i bs, step baeks,pop outs),bays,banding,pofohes, manatene,as wall planes and Foof lines that are visible f+om�he subjeet publie stl:eet. e. The e�iisting struet+ir-es on Lots 20, 2 1, and 23 shall meet the dimensional standards fe the 4 zoning distr-ictlisted in r DG Table 11 2A 5. in addition, the areashall pr-Ewide paved dr-iveways to the existing hames that will take aeeess off the sEffltheffl- drive. 2. The final plat shall ineltide the folio a. Add a platnote static " eetlot-aecess to E. Pine Avenue is prohibited." easements an the sides Lots 1 l n-z�ekcn�-caid Lacs 1-6 & 8 17,Blee ci d. Modify note 14 to inelude language stating tha4 all side Wt lifles&r-Lots 1 10,-Bleek 2, and Lots 1 6 & 8 17, Bleek 1 eentain a three (3) feet wide easement&f publie titilities, iFFigatiaa, aa ar e. Modify note 14 to inelude language stating tha4 all side Wt lifies&r-Lots 20 23,-Bleek 1 eentain a five (5) &et wide easement for-publieritilities, iffigation, and drai - N Adkins Ave. g. Submit-aix exhibit showing zJvco zc,z x, aixa-z3z6 64-=f33 t6 t Pe along-c-4 a}me}iai6f3a standards. if they do fiat, lot lines may need to be adjusted or stfbtetttr-es may fleed to be n. Pr-a= Ie an amenity i„ the f,-m of a beWOO- City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions 3. The landseape plan submitted with the final plat shall ifielude the fellowifig FeVisk)Hs� a. include mitigation calculations on the plan for existing trees that are proposed to be removed aecowith the standards in cr�crUDG 11 3 1n-�vc.TrneAppliean shall eoor-dinate,with the G t . A -be-ist(Kyle V,,-it 7 ,;f 1; -4y ,,.\ to dete-:niae . _ T�vzccccriixxnc mitigation Fequifements pr4of t Femoval f e stifig trees 4;-..,v, the site plat,b. Pr-ovide details on the ground coverage inatefial that will be used along Pine Avenue. standards listed in UPC Table 11 2A 5 and 11 2A 7 fef the R 4 and R 15 zoning disti4ets. 5. Prior-to the City Engineer's signattife on the final all existing sh-detttfes that do not .4;»-,Y, t the setbacks of the A 4 zoning district shall be - o,l , including but not limited to ettl de sacs, alleys, driveways, 601nmon driveways, easements, 7. 04 street par-king is r-e"if:ed to be pr-ovided in aeeofd with the standaMs listed in UPG Table 11 3G 6 for-single family& ellifig., based on the mbe f of bedrooms per- flit 8. The pr-elifnifiafzy plat appFoval shall beeome atill and void 4 the appheant fails to eithef! 1) approvefindings; or-obtain approval of a time ex4ension as set foFth i UDC 11 6B-7. 9. The fifial plat shall s4stantially eomply with the appr-oved pFelimifiaf�y plat as set fo4h ift. T TUDG 11 6B-3-C 10. Comply with all subdivision design and iffi-pf:ovement standafds as set fef4h in UPG 11 , ifieluding but not limited to etil de saes, alleys, dfiveways, eommon dfiveways, easements, !I. The appheant an&or-assigns shall hm,e the eontintting obligation to pfovide iffigation that meets the standafds as set f6i4h in UPC; 11 3B 6 and to install and ffi—ain-t-ain--all landseapifig as f.-ti, i UPC 11 3$3 T TAT 3B 13 and TTIC-11 3Bz4. 12. Submit an updated eommen dr-ive eirrhibit for-the southem eoffiffloft dFive showing the dfiveways and the set-baeks for-the existing homes that will remain on Lets 20, 2 1, and 23, Bloek 1. 13. The A,.pliea t shall , ply with ll AGHP , , l;tions F.,pp- ., 1 a final ��,.�1 zxscerdwith UPC-11 6-B 7, she: City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions B. Meridian Public Works rRE-FLAT OUNDFMNS W astowater * IN to Sawa ewwM Llil at sc 5e 01:5 Sewer Shod Ezlmated Plryoet Sac app maDn Sew"ERLFS - WRAF 6cclnM 6ahnoc PrcdLtrt r:+KkstL4 t yes Wit WW Naswr MrkjFatllltf F tw - Imlrarssfoann�sTsc SM FUI:1Ir1Wr13 Slit&Pod&Corrdlbans Water • Ells=ante mWater W2tEF*Mrhle at Sttc Serlors + FYcauC Zdrle • Estlm and Proled Sac appleation Water ERU's + YI21icrQralry None Propect CoressaM Yes wlth Wier kdsur Pbn YnparlXfmnocros None F'L�IJI:R'uuxw W1kILTal Krrr NYIt Spetirg 4,Additliw4 aF A"/ YJF 1. I �nrcr...�.etra,.c Stx•er nwn Iwp. _. FBVnaer w. iry irdkr eA eI1 want.Ifl Well z lotaord on iM me n nium be abwdorrti per rt-VIOLA)re,gwrm zu peareal cbgneonniem mws tst pro.drd is dst[:vy.[-an be wei rrriFf—rvsal unppdwn. 3. PDowidu 19 FA2nww ILL nlilyd,h}drorls Ledtfok wd.Idtf 6m pwta.I-Aumpt us should ealend Lip ui IIic and orsuurrtadrara? az er vKrcr arrd LIF Flyond IL A. Ncn sznin tsjmee ,beAs,hwldag ewpons,aaah etatpaalt.blLi.fend Inl!dvr ..n utr toi r.h, t .j w Fe tuilL w.sh.n the d.Ilup car rsum 5. Fim.m no sewrr serrrc pu LLia p mnlugu vcv_trtx. 5. HeNunLhrlffia ismofin willsinSuF the w:derrneler. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions Geori it i:ou3lious A Appifo"l 1. Ajjd.L..L>I.a11-L ow.alcir xrx er nwn lLat and rt>+Lxt g.Lih Vrt Public Work Iliaisr4xvuL and cx Lx utx xLar,iad rarim ofraLea'en La far rl,nulns ila aro rail.Ircd La Provide serv�uc uu .&ara publw hluiil wh raver aver xev,cs maims LS thne fitL,L<Ko.rr rianl Lop of prpt Lo su&V dd_L''Las Ulan Lhrec lar LLm aluffum m L:r LLLI shAl br uLed LL lcWwwwiiL-of(:Liy al Mfn3a,1 Fublk Wairlr Llr(AmemS SUlldifd."inco 2. Per MuWidr th,[-adc 1 KRX:],Lill 1IM111 ud dull he n!SfHAUJ9,La-Mani Al-if rid w9kif aL..La io sad Ltfhu gh Lb1&-q,K•ui_u L.Appl,arLima,be diSiNe for a reir&ufflrrl iep mro rtr Lnfto rucwro per M[:r=i-&-S_ 3. ThtdWl.c LgWlProvide c,LserLtchLlxF roe Wpilrc,tar:Us&.0 rkoLar .ay{th_Lu3_dill waror xervrri a id iy2rW}the easemtnL w.&hr.xba11 be m-lkt ..k fora swell uldtlr,w 304cn.LEr For Era The rratbacms sJnall rob 6c dedv:llxd,L&du pUL,br ralh[r dndlw,ai rttllsidc the pflt pinam usk*he i:LR'ed Morwim's shrdard fmuic..The ealeYr_id shall hu rvJSp LiCSILy�'I•-.,an IYC Fiji lie frter86:C�wY1S.tiuhnld all tuwdeti erde .L(o..Ll,u lufm Av L,ble Imm PWAilc Wadi),i legal dlx rgpuaa pftpQ td by m Idaho L.Kcraod Prultsa ad Land Hurve,or,.iLN LLad IohWL-Lhu uca ol'Vrtt ntea Intarhed F.xiia 3rl'A)jail un K7:1-a L L-n V wd1b hemp and disl.-u {nwkei I,LI L1111T F9 Gr rovtc�.FkAh c,:l�d,nc nil be seaLk xlgned red Aoei by a F-ILsaclonLL 13nd tiur,.•foe.LA) MITT RF:{YJR I}. Jidda rlmc L4 dic plm rareftwi%lbJs dacullmil..ALI Odtmx'n LS MULZ U subml"rt-w-L iW approvr:d prlarmdtitkpavMpLLi wiluut9l. 4. 'I7rt L-nyarMtrtdtaireq.ues Lhrprezurldi urlgium syxLeaniti sugilued by i,c9lfauled source a I'wjorr�13 Ly;113FS�,k 71Le apP It ail xha.ld br eequtJ W u use any es.tatn g sue rScror .ell�aLee ear 11r prinury source. If i xmaee at wK{I iLarf*a i.]1 a,illlbk.a sln&-poi d a,eadxrr La the Lulteary.00ci sYsWft.shall ht"uved.11 r uuLu&d. the■eu,eliprrrd1hu:utlxu.sihlu Iw Lltu luyuitaLarasaeLLnw err IhL`ramewar 3fE'dparrw Filar W eletivihK d.,rululiuiuhl nIaA alilli-Al. 3. A'lle"nUg 1Lfu%-wmlllr.uc 1 uyuiNd LL hL shall be pnar Lie smrlwdr as Me FLruL plu by Lltr C rL,F:uruimi. ,illy u n„q„rL�dua we.LLu.ed La rmlaln itW I be sm1p!CLLa e.a lliamif.,Leal FPOMIhlc rcra.,x,,,,k„L t.l v ica a6Voa,t w bL Ln eo"ludec rLih k K:[-. d. All vet aw.i wiLcrrayr,vLmrxnhLnp, t Ovag or Iir bc.ne.iut.Wv.dlod irJ114e9SlrelrfdpH Lfl3f_11-3AA 3..1-G S.uch,.ate Lbe applicant rltall r amply with kl.W>[lir�42-1207 old knv iidm qT-Ii ahIc law iif Jqulra,an. 7. AA-lb L'ul will h,LioliLtlut Lo WLe"niva Ee prycrlyabr.JorKdrroontugm ldria Well C"Laiucl,on Si.udu ds E LLri almiltt3LLYL-0 by the Idaho Lkj)ll 1.of Wmrr Rriour[eL.The Lhatel*Wj Flu}:.cu:A.all provldc A eU,c1Y-..L addresslrlg xhtlhtr tll2rt llet any bt.aing.eWL LL the ir481cf .IL,.ud d act,her Mey wILL c�u he used,ar pro,L&rowed"Lbe.r abardonnKrtn K. ,Say cvlsaag xpL,c sysLcnls.wlthr iu proleti Llull be[er..,vcd G.OS xervlfY per[-ry LLrnu.nrr.. tcuoli SLI-4And'l9 H. L-orusn CbkW dLGelci Hk*M F&QufhdaLmomprLlcb3ucsrid in.R L'LfrG(2DH)37.i2I I. 9. Sami sLW art m Be In place,l761N[�sr.er wO�alcr Lyf weal fbalL be jprKovrd mid Acb,alet♦l, mod hale llAW,td by LRL-Adl{V wWy H#b iy UkwKL and Lilt Filial Flu 3or iha suhd„v.Kr "I be[ecwdk!d,prior ru appl,mg for dmlmg ptmlLx. 30.A kl arcrodt[w cosh suety m ac i loum of I IC%will.1,rrgweel Ifr ALI. OFILpleLcd rmtLo&Uad n� an18r111eL,e .,pflar w xlffr Wu ith Ur Ruud pIr< 33.A31 uMx& -aLcn u etllttdto public lue,safety aW health shall bt aarllpLabil pn&r w onupawy arils mua,res.W heir oWo*fd by Llhr[-Sy higlrKcr.an a.srr rftaf poa a pHfowarlcEr sumy rise La,L#ufpravenww m wda to ahwn f:uy Hri. cii iLgisaurc on the risL pLu ix se[I"m LIU{'11-51--313. 12.Ap1pl1 cAnL shall he roquuad Lo pay P uh Iic W ae Ls dcvt Iopnitm p Ma rtvk..and corttarudwri 1nr{tlw1vn few m drmmirrd B,ruLg Lhc p1m revrtx pruati prior m LFr rxuantm ora plan ippeo,A knee. 11.I[hall br Lhc ro NnslGLrty ardc applicanL w crrurc dtaa all dr.clapnttm Iti-n,ucs Konply.uh 1ht,lLrerttara rah UarbdlLLtf A[L altd Lhc Fa,r Housing Act 14.Appllconi. hJWI he res nsiblc lar appLKanal artdtompi wnh any Li cl 404 rernll Lltng the nu,be rcquvrd bf Lhc Amly CwlK ad FnX.ltccrx. 15.I. vtk1w shtLLl c000dlnttle awlhan L iLora wrdi Nc Mtftduh Pact ilmr1cc. 14.Cangw LLr wa scsulu.shall be submiard LL the kr uLdLan kLuld,Lg Ilepinownt.for AL budding FLbk Cw tivlllg engLh crcti brcalLll,rI�rr ivawlg would ill.atop rill-..-.-. 17.Tbr deLLErt engttK.r shall be rmluvtd m ee„Ry iltro the xv ccnafrLm e4-.uroas aro stL a minm al3-rr jba,c 11rt hLbL csubllshod peal grouWwatrr ticv n.'Ilrr Is w craurc wm the dourm elevamm a1'Vtr crcr I Ara ul hont Is ro It I-15, jba,c. I K.Tht appIlcontr.dtLlgn bilge rshall be rcspora.blc Itr uLjt3rttan ara11 tfr.rA..n AfW& driul.W ExiLry.rNh lh Li pmfWL dkiLL do,cot TO urnier Lht jwi*dlanin rit an ifny3aa,a,l dL.9riL -or A[711}.'rk-ycylgn enguetr shall.provrie oaul LtLLIan ehr Lhr ULikilc7,Lave hceo te:ulk-d LL k'oedmce dbLht apprb.cd der pl. T1us bmuflta ah..11 bt fe.luvc-0".Pr,.a cm.kcmt crm uparrl,a Mufti for jay suual wnhaLhc pnr� 39.AL the campinLOLL orVrt proJei4 Lhr applKara shall ht reapomible w submlL rc:ord dlar BV pY the CIL,or hi,xLdLari AmbAA11 zwidl'd' These rrierd dn.rSs a.tmbt roc. load apProvea Pr"m Lht�e Ora t nawaLL Mf cupWLL`y lie jay Ar-'i•• wuhtn the pru.j0.L 2a.A arty ligh plan.1IL ribbed w be Included m 13c cl.11 odl%rwmLofL plan.L lad I.Fhi plan requirear=nu arc ILard m satuan 64 aR Lhe I12WOv YrnL tivmdsr,;Rw%mott I-qlLiryg.A.copy orLlenaatl3rdiian he laund r hnP.ilxrw.IllehdwLciLy.orgPuhlte_rorlx.r i!ul NZ. 73.The['dy allertdlna lnhju Lbm Uro u.mr poa 1 the Cny a pLrra it c sum,m L1r arn,.rt ar 125%arLbr Loral cooLtl4t coo for aLLt onLplcu xrxer,wj zU ray,xc Infi*d� pnarmfLnWFlaslgnawe.'rLL Luray wdIbib,f I1WbyaLiwLLmI oral eWntaePeevededby ima.rte,rm did[-Ly.'rre ra,etty,.a.be p&mL d I n im hint arse an-&o Ae Iddl a areslu4 rash deptrt.Larboi"I Lamm rNfi lit an;4WKaoLortGarsorely,.bib can btR.0 onLht 1:onlLwuuiy 13C dxfem Llepl[lnlem.etear. Pkase ee Did.L lard Lk Vdiciphien L Ktrvlce bar meet Lnirr+^ +u"7,7311. 22.'17rt city o rMerid Ina rtrf.Irci Lha Ute a.tmr poa in We:Ley a irn■6y r L)mIht jrr rL or XI%of dh caul ranxlnci.h race la[AI Kaupbe ds ltr.Wa ar.l I mfri au n.....err durmLKt ad .yt .'lls.>.wny.IIL be v nflbya lie aim raa�provided b?We a.a mUtc Cay.Tltc:._:Lev.or,ltr paw_-0 uI Lht rLenl orm rrrtoeble la Tara lti Kash dipuClar bmid.Allilli-L a:ter l d:y i a:t::i.aiiwl Nor' tly,.bL'h can ht lound as Lht Canlmuiuly l3ewl--ill_al. rt1-7- Pkaae CfruaLL Lard 1XVt1opaenL%eerier ear nK,reulforaLuw:iuNX7 2=11. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) OMIL V"prwdwr MM iardrr onw CunfYwar" 11 ACHD -4- ItRatrkZ NNaar%Canrrftk� Date:]une 9",202S REVISED To JeNiCa Henle.SIUOr*H ArMltea5 Staff Contact:watt Pak Planner Project Deseriptiare Farrington Heights TnpGeneradon: This dLrelopnrentrsestrmated W Werate340 vehldB[nps per dot . A vONI-16 t►iPO�r how in ilia PM Ptak Nour_bawd Orr She ln!Hitut#OFTrenxporC2Ti t Engineers Trip Generation Manual,W"edition. Tiraffir.Impact Study NU required Do area roadways meet Th re, the rutura with plar-ni NO Connecting you to Mom- Ada 4PMq Wigh-pY Dq%.vt-Fnw M Mr"AW^HR'�CIIT.Q-R4-;-PM FJ7WHA;hp FN7 '4SG-Mw',lp� MJ V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the map amendment does not comply with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan in regard to the Medium Density Residential future land use map City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings designation for the site. This is primarily due to the lack of transition in lot sizes to the existing residential. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds that the proposed map amendment and subsequent development will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available in the City. However, the Commission believes the lack of open space and transition to the existing residential does not meet the purpose statement. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed zoning amendment will be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The Commission cites lack of a transition to the existing residential, increase in density from the R-4 zoning, and a lack of open space will be detrimental to the surrounding area. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds that the proposed amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services to this site. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This is not applicable due to this application being a rezone. B. Preliminary Plat and Short Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Commission finds the proposed plat is not conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. The Commission cites concerns with a lack of transition to the existing residential and a lack of open space for reasons they are recommending denial. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds that public services are available and can be extended into the site to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; City water and sewer and other utilities will be extended by the developer at their own cost, therefore, the Commission find the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare. The Commission cites lack of a transition to the existing residential, increase in density from the R-4 zoning, and a lack of open space will be detrimental to the surrounding area. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission finds there are no natural, scenic, or historic features that need to be preserved with development of this property. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed modification to the Development Agreement, Rezone, and Preliminary Plat with the conditions of approval listed in Section IV. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on August 7t'',2025. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject annexation and preliminarypl requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Jessica Heggie b. In opposition: Stephanie John, Bob Flaten,Karen Blanton, Brian Truner,Maralee Turner, Jack Harp,Rick Salladay. c. Commenting: Stephanie John,Bob Flaten,Karen Blanton,Brian Truner,Marilee Turner, Jack Harp,Rick Salladay, d. Written testimony: Don Flaten e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) public testimony_ a. Privacy, as the proposed new development consists of two-story homes,and the existing residential is primarily single-story. Increased traffic on Adkins and Pine. Diminished property values due to a lack of privacy from the new two-story homes. Grading difference between the existing residential and the new development. 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. The commission discussed the lack of transition to the existing residential. Primarily concerns about the two-story homes abuttingthe he sin l�ry. In addition,the increase in density from the R-4 zone to the R-15 zone was considered out of place for the existing landscape. Lastly,the commission felt the lack of a regional park and open space provided by the development was not sufficient to justify amending the DA. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Recommending Denial. 5. Outstandingissue(s)for City Council: a. The applicant is requesting to be remanded to the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow for modification to address the concerns of the neighbors. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action ' 1 1 . 1U - _ • �IIII�IIIIIIIIII �:,,, IN •� V T' CHERRY -_F , .:r �, ■ FAIRVIEW - - O Lu MIL - a\ !/ i I ea. Jul No �� ,n I Gila .�s *■# z..=r` mom -� FRANKLYN -lr.■■ r■ >t R��a�: nnnlruurlr�wr■un w..g —r:wQ?r�r�:1 •atii�rii: W7573:::r a:... . ■R�%!••O�r 'rnr9uugrlurrr■ : tln� WZo 1lw uun■nllll►�fo urC�► nrVGrl _ mnmwni, �fu - ■ � rrnrrm!1■rrrr►1�i�� tl_ _-■w— R61 ��' ■i�� CHERRY"' FAIRVIEW U _ O I. ■ i■ �. xp1 '/�rr� �� �y11 . 1•a'•1 4F1��•xr♦,f'ufnri All r ■: 9�\nn Mll Lul PINE FRANK�IN , I i ■����■■ . ■� 1 V��r�■■a ■.rq unlrrr■l■■tti- .EmiliaIt ■■r���. ■ �1 llru ■n■■■■u1 11i6►�/rluLGi�G� ■ n allnu.1!! CHERRY"`�'�`- FA`IRVIEW \Ifl -ice Ill!.■r■-. 7 Q large- ■ Hil a_r%m r iirro.tp irieu 7 ariSam I•i• N ryL�V 1� Iloilo ♦ Q .,a Intl I J ■,i PINE lilt.' liar 11■I r a ' N 0 ----- �� N Irry _ ■..■�C-i 9• �I__ ■r-o.►�r q11U = 11/ \q� _ ��-■■1�■rfO��O =M■!�:� IIII ■ ■■.r.. mar/��Il� ►•�� : --`�i . . ■ ■■ I ylex ■:il.:o rr..llr�.+umnlln'q�llJ + ■r i7 \��D+t�+�/■u�Imul� Ilullm■sn■IIIna aa:a::u. +��lun mul■u11nIGIrI.... EN II l�I■� - • �� wry■:ml� �f+�lnlln^ ■■ uO �u■w�11llnrq gl.�InunFlllnllnnm w/-fib_- T .-.'■- -1♦..�1'a+�; lilt!. tlrw ==- - �• • • •• • '/H./il= =r■C-�:__���;���■i(I�i p� y�runlls �+�nurllunuwwru �� -��f■■� p��itlalleaa �,_` IR�I,t. ■N FAIR7AllJI E W ❑ . �■ ■ �, man _ — F?�wr C�•�� G. , R■Rinlllfl�iu_ ♦ _ 1� �.■!. __ •1��.• ���� � Imo■ ■� ■- � �_ ` ■ , _ LT■ � Innnn •■■.;�■ 14I'�IiY+�`iiu =ini�1- `•,� I� •ftlil...Imo � = � �::� I�it■uurtr�IllNlnnlvl�p �[Ifllipr`i- e'�i li -. ■f1},'r'.�u••■• ��I :ii- ■r ♦�;r�`n��-IHi111 fr{ryp �- 0in �r IIII ■ /-CC:� IHi-■ ',yr q riirorr ��I .rim\.■�' p;l 11111 l!r:r 7V r Ur wltl:`-■-. + �G7C=.�yi Hip?rN„rV r �_ ..al fig r � !HiO la= � r■■illuurN�41\ �, '""'_'['�a, �/p� ,iorr• � �� IIIIO■o■� � _1.�I 11..R!IIII i�::aerll r1IlA r 111/11111 �"hny�rn71nnn4 ■- wq r7Hi■ 1!C III ■ 111Lt :\�1 ■n :•Ili - ttill... ILJ-- �:::.. � � '1; .�' '7 !AEI■�IIII PINE ■NR�7y�rnluiun r' ■.IIIII IIII■■Ilflrl i=of m m Hilo n nm . L'llllll�l��� � ; III. �. �■■� �■ �■■■. lip ��. RUNS ■ a im �-- IIII"IIIC son. r ■ ��FR:AN KL-IN� ■ NONE11■ ■■II■ IIII■� B. Subject Site Photos I� lit 1 - S 1 I i y r _ f. . •r� o-�� � R• A lV Ada - .k ' r ■ City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report Overall Score: 37 83rd Percentile Criteria Description ■ ■ Location In City Limits GREEN Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft. fray-. pr GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or , % a. es GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets EEN plan) matches existing ( of lanes} 6 School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles 0:. a Schaal Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile Jr-,inr: GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Landscape Plan(date: 5/11/2025) --- ---------- =2-T......... ----------- ......... . . 1(7I. I =--- LF] LIDJ F M==7 FF ----------- 'r----------7" ........... ...... L--------i2- -----------I r...........I ------------ L--------LJ ------------j L-----------IJ --I F T I --L--------LJ L,L-----------J L----------I J, r............r..1 L.L-----------j L------- -------- rr------------i r------------r"I ---------_.J L-----------J I.-i L--------------j L--------- --------------; L102 City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits i ------------ 2E��5�- "5-- L150 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Preliminary Plat(date: 7/23/2025) ^dor------ OWN 610-1 V FrT d d A rF !!c LI I i, L W PP-1 AM h-) ------ t t 7 F—Wu� L------------------------—----------------q r . — u� ---------------- [--------------------------------- City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F, Hcigl—9 bdi ---------— IC I IL I L------------------ L---------- ---------------------- y ja- L----------------- -- - Er 1p-mg- ------- -------- if Hdeh. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Building Elevations(date: 4/17/2025) - � l P s k 4 r, NOUN ■UN■ soon NONE NONE no } - f 'Pop. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Rezone Legal Description&Exhibit Map a I DAH O 1'e39 yr E+tieraid St ISGSURVEY Fno•rr:t2caF Bea-e5x GROUP fax-. 884 5YA Farr{naWq HeIg1N9 Subdivision Pr*Irsninrry P1st Pamel Description Thg WoWrlg Pe95abN R R9,001V Lwd tewp Far€ala 1.2 Mil EaceoUen FAfOhl at &howr1,3±R4Qefd tf 5uver ha."98 ad Qed fm Retftm h,vie Ada Cmr Re[LrdVB offikoB.and the Flea or the Rill of Ways dr Ean Pine Awmrrr wd Adkiia Lome lyng iq■Porten al the"•unhurt iia of mt"hyast Ifs d*4Gripn 7,TowrtYBV 3 Nomh Range 1 Easl.35mv M mmigi 1.Crly 4r Muna6w.A4aq C,Pwty Idaho and berg morn Pancularrf OmmbW Is kmiAn E0mmLrHCW0 Bk the 5a.dh ErW Cvrw ar Ma,rhttl'rkket 1+4 frt IN Nd LNM iN iENL 1.4 G;wrMr'J Dr-1.m m 7.Toawahla2 Nash.Rarye 2 Wear 9t,M Medan,Fram whKI+.Iha 5;wS ,Bal Comer or the NorflAall 1N(Career 1N{:corer?of znd Sedion 7 bebm South WNW West 2.647.Bl FwL Thsncr■"1he^amawmly Bvijrldin Line if lho Swtheasl 14 d the Nordiew-4M or mkt Smarm 7 South ET071Lti4'Vdev 6743Tfeel to the f ine Ink-me hm pcnr of HYh Xikms Atienue,the POW OF M&M kWN*: Tie^ corirn 9A"and Savthwiv ElwndwY Ld'ra.SC4Aha"4744-Mat 334611 'MW w we u#wwU 8wr4M Lire of card Raccr'd cf 56r4ey.and m Prob-o llm: 7her1w{aary'gl Red.'i41r11►lerly BourA y Lrlr."aloaq LIM Wrdtr l 9cund.6ty Lsieof mW RetrMd of SLL v ,and its ProYm+ mm.Nodh 00W'5T Ems.679 t3 heel m ihs Nuftm sl Comer of aria 6Lsanrd of SLjn .. lrherr:a Isuyng maid Mmhm QmKKSAq Lms.w.0 he ProbFmjwl)n-eerd ALwig M`t ktwlheft$oww4my ure of sa4 FkecxaorSIrrrFy.srd ea s'roRHNWor Narih em'21'51-ropa 331 47 IRg1 ro the Cgrwlnp or Al"Lars: ilwme Lcmxq said Nulharhe Hourlday Lwm.and tls ProkYlpalrtn,and a13nip thm GrYer�Flr ar AlkMe Lane,Stulh M'02'01'Wee.677 99 iesl 10[he POWT OF BEGINNING: The aharo Oe-sc Abed 10arcol 04 Land Goirtaln*$.21 @CM.score or lass. Parr .I IL City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits S Farmington Heights Subdivision Preliminary Plat Description 14MOM SWIV-1 inrh=77 feel T—1-5}I W 1.xw+.I'NAW 83 ci71<-M.+W LLOW:VG q 1'.WM3M.rw—W II•:V.9 F. AI M¢71b—llr it W OOMH I:971 13 I Ntl,S, J340 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Latitude Forty Three Subdivision (H-2024-0059) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at 675, 715 and 955 S. Wells St. Application Requires a Continuance A. Request: Annexation of 17.27 acres of land with R-8 (13.78 acres), R-15 (2.42 acres) and C-N (1.07 acres) zoning districts. B. Request: Preliminary Plat to re-subdivide lots 7, 21 and 22, Magic View Subdivision, Amended into 79 residential lots, 1 commercial lot and 11 common/other lots on 15.97 acres of land in the R-8, R-15 and C-N zoning districts.