Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-08-26 Work Session
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, August 26, 2025 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the August 12, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the August 12, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Compass Charter School Gymnasium Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025- 0087) 4. Little Creek Subdivision No. 2 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0094) 5. W. Villaggio Way Black Cat Connection (Grand Mogul) Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0101) 6. Oil Changers Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0103) 7. Final Order for Pickleball Court Subdivision (FP-2025-0017) by The Land Group, Inc., located at 4050 W. McMillan Rd. 8. City of Meridian Financial Report - July 2025 9. Resolution 25-2533: A resolution adopting an Administrative Policy of the Meridian Police Department regarding approved server training programs ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] DEPARTMENT REPORTS [Action Item] 10. Destination Downtown Discussion ADJOURNMENT 5:52 PM Meridian City Council Work Session August 26, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:32 p.m. Tuesday, August 26, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Caleb Hood, Bill Parsons, Brian McClure, Shawn Harper and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts X John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order for the record it is August 26, 2025, at 4:32 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move we adopt the agenda as presented. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the agenda. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the August 12, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the August 12, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 2 of 24 3. Compass Charter School Gymnasium Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0087) 4. Little Creek Subdivision No. 2 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0094) 5. W. Villaggio Way Black Cat Connection (Grand Mogul) Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0101) 6. Oil Changers Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0103) 7. Final Order for Pickleball Court Subdivision (FP-2025-0017) by The Land Group, Inc., located at 4050 W. McMillan Rd. 8. City of Meridian Financial Report - July 2025 9. Resolution 25-2533: A resolution adopting an Administrative Policy of the Meridian Police Department regarding approved server training programs Simison: Next up is the Consent Agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move we approve the Consent Agenda as presented. For the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT REPORTS [Action Item] 10. Destination Downtown Discussion Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 3 of 24 Simison: So we will go into Department Reports. First item up -- or the only item up is Destination Downtown discussion. Danley: Good afternoon. I think we are good. Good afternoon, Mayor, Council. Pleasure to be back in front of you. Okay. I think we are good to go -- there we go. Okay. We are back and thank you for having us. Appreciate it. Just again Chris Danley, Vitruvian planning project manager for Destination Downtown. And with me is Aaron Qualls. Aaron will come up in a moment and you will get a chance to know him. He is with SCJ Alliance, who wrote the design standards that is mostly of topic this evening. So, again, appreciate the opportunity to be before you again. So, what is our purpose today? Our purpose is to do a couple things. Really we want to make sure to go over a bit about Old Town specifically, because that's where and why the design standards were created. So, this is a very symbiotic relationship between the two; right? So, if we are comfortable with most of what Old Town's vision is, then, the intent is that the design standards need to make the vision happen and vice-versa; right? And making certain that all of that works hand in glove and, then, to certainly answer any questions that you may have, certainly address any comments and be able to make and maximize the most of our time today. So, I want to start off a little bit about how we got here. So, the design standards started off -- and some of you understood -- or were here I believe to understand that there was a -- my understanding was that there was a building that was proposed that stood out. Let's just say that. And it was quite bright and vivid and so forth and it began a dialog about design standards, which, then, really ultimately led to a request of staff and sure of you all with leadership for this particular set of tasks to be in Destination Downtown. It was included in our scope of work and informed throughout the process through that input that was had at multiple levels. Staff comments were had also so, too, were many of yours who were submitted -- who submitted comments and we took those comments especially from staff and really worked to implement those into the revised set of design standards to move forward and other things to understand is to remember that the MDC board looked at this and approved with unanimous consent and we were here in front of you last fall with a good warm reception that was had. Certainly a desire to have further dialog, which is what we are doing here today. But overall a good warm reception. I kind of showed this to you last month. I'm just going to keep showing it to you, because I think it's important for you all to get that background and make certain where this stuff came from. It wasn't just coming from us, but it did come from all of the different bullets that you see before you. Everything from the individual and stakeholder meetings that were subject specific, through some of our public outreach, Dairy Days and so forth. Online surveys of the public and, then, multiple check ins with the board and so on and so forth. So, none of this stuff really towards the end should have come as a surprise. It was iterative as we went through the process and all of these things worked hard to inform it. So, I want to set the stage for the next handful of slides on Old Town and, then, I'm going to turn it over to Aaron and he will walk you through really, again, the design standards specific. So, what was the goal? The goal not only for the whole plan was to go, obviously, from spine for -- I always kind of refer to it as freeway to Fairview, but is to address these little sub areas as you saw last fall and specifically in terms of Old Town. What were we trying to achieve in Old Town? I think most of these are agreeable to you Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 4 of 24 and probably also replicated in your comp plan and so forth and trying to achieve things like thriving retail, making certain we take care of that existing neighborhood while also promoting a downtown that is inviting for new businesses and potential residential. Attractive streets and spaces and how do we continue to march toward the most appealing and humanized space, not just in Meridian but even in the valley. So, all of those things were very important the economic activity certainly we got to make sure to pay for it. Where are those dollars coming from and the revenues that are coming from it and all of those things were really important. But ultimately it's about making this corridor and this Old Town really continue to come to life in that next iteration. So, as a reminder for Old Town -- now, this in and of itself was an exercise, because Old Town means about 29 different things when you ask different folks from the city of Meridian, whether it's leadership at one -- in defining it, staff and documentation, the city -- you know, the residents and so forth, everybody had different versions of what that meant. So, we tried our best to truly define that and we did so by what you see in front of you, that traditional city core, which is a documented location within code. Looked at the -- what we call the neighborhood enhancement areas and I will get into a bit more the neighborhood -- or the railroad corridor and that -- what we call that traditional corridor two, which is south of the railroad corridor. What are we trying to achieve, you know, in some of this. I will touch on it a little bit more, but some of the things I mentioned to going -- vertical along the railroad corridor, in-fill and really also trying to revitalize some of those areas that maybe need a little bit of help. So, let's start with the middle. I will work towards the edges and, then, turn it over to Aaron. The railroad corridor, we certainly saw that and a lot of feedback on it that where density and where height was maybe more most -- most supported was along these particular parcels that front the railroad corridor on both sides and so the thought process was here to allow that to occur go a little bit higher. Your code already has some provisions to go up to a certain height. I think we are fairly aligned with that, just making a little bit more official, getting up to maybe closer to a hundred feet and so forth. Just point of reference. I believe -- and maybe staff remembers this, but I think Scheels is pretty close to about a hundred foot. I know when I took my daughter on the Ferris wheel on the inside and felt like we were up pretty high. So, I think we are about that. Trying to embrace that corridor, linear green spaces, you all have been working hard, hard, hard for years to get this rail with trail and if I'm not mistaken I think it's happening. I thought I saw in a construction document it's moving forward or funded at least. So, kudos to you. So, it's really again about enhancing that space as much as possible and really bringing that dream to life. The -- the next sections, that city core two and one beyond the railroad corridor is a step down. This is the transition that honors -- especially the next group of folks who are the residents and it's not trying to just box them out in terms of height, but also still maximizing some of those parcels as much as we can. So, an acceptable height that does get up closer to the 75 feet and that pretty much aligns with what you have seen in some of the more recent developments. We heard that pretty consistent, but I will tell you we had people tell us from two stories to 20 and it really ranged. So, we tried our hardest to find that middle ground as much as -- as we could. Trying to make it a pedestrian rich environment. I think you have heard us talk on that quite a bit. The festival street concept and other things that really, again, try to make these things continue to come to life and fulfill that ultimate vision and, then, the neighborhood Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 5 of 24 enhancement areas, that's what we are just kind of calling that, and so this isn't really about making any recommendations on big wholesale changes. This is -- these are established neighborhoods. This is where people live and so we were certainly sensitive to that and I think so, too, was all the input that we gathered on that. It's really about kind of enhancing it, you know, making it a little bit more unique where we can, where -- where there might be interest and so that's really what it was about. Did have some recommendations on some degree of in-fill, with things like ADUs, for example, taking advantage and really helping people maybe be able to stay in their home, frankly, because we know that the values have continued to go up so much, so, too, have their property taxes; right? So, maybe maximizing their units and their properties in ways that might be achieving a different housing goal, but also bringing a little bit of revenue into them possibly, things like that. So, I'm going to turn it over to Aaron. Aaron will introduce himself a little bit and, then, go through the design standards, where they came from, what are they trying to say and what are the objectives before we, then, turn it over to you for any Q and A. Aaron. Qualls: Thanks, Chris. And good afternoon, Mayor, Council. It's great to be here down in the southern part of the state. I'm from Sandpoint, Idaho, and a little bit more about me. I have been with SCJ Alliance for about three years now. Before that I served as a planning commissioner, I served as an urban renewal board member and a council member, staff planner and planning director. Now, in addition to working with cities and counties throughout the state and in other states as well, we -- I occasionally even help developers through the entitlement process. So, I have been looking at this through a variety of different lenses. So, this picture I love of Old Town. I love it, because it's a -- it's really good urban form. It's a place that you would want to visit. I look at this picture and say I would like to walk around in this place; right? And it wasn't because of zoning codes or planners or consultants, it's because that's how people build cities for thousands of years; right? They built them for people and a successful downtown area is a place you want to go and see people and be seen, which is perhaps evident by -- if you look at what -- I think the driver is looking at in his rear view mirror. So, before we -- oh, thanks. Next slide. Before we get into the details what we find when we work with a lot of jurisdictions is that when you are talking about a vision and goals you generally find a lot of consensus, but when you start talking about how to implement those goals and policies, that's when debate happens, when you get into the details and that's where we are at while looking at some recommended design standards for consideration in your traditional city core. So, we have looked at a lot of the past efforts you have done, which has been some really good work on the -- by the city. Your historic preservation plan, your street cross-section master plan, the Comprehensive Plan in 2019, your strategic plan in 2021 and Destination Downtown in 2024 and the work that Chris has been doing. There is a lot of common themes that we found for downtown by looking at all these policy -- policy documents. People focused. Walkable and bikeable. Beautification. Community identity and active and vibrant. So, we looked at policy to see how we might implement it; right? And you have done some implementation. We found in your code with the public realm and this is what's shown on the right side of your screen there is a section from your own code that talks about that public realm where it tries to create that active environment sense -- that sense of Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 6 of 24 safety, comfort and interest for pedestrians in the downtown area. What we are talking about now is the other side of that. The private realm. And what we have tried to do in these recommendations is maintain your traditional urban form, make it people centric, help enhance the identity of your downtown and also help continue that vibrancy -- that trend of vibrancy that Chris was talking about. At the same time we are also -- and this is where the different lenses come in from -- from how I look at code is to help make it more streamlined, predictable, clear, balanced and flexible, which I think is all very important. This is not -- the recommendations that we provided are not an overhaul of your code, it's more of just a shoring up here and there based on your existing policy and based on the trends that have -- that are already established. So, first to set the stage, it's always important to talk about where these apply and what flexibility that there is built in from the onset. So, what we recommended is that -- this isn't required for any new construction wholesale, but a 50 percent increase of an existing building, then, the standards kick in and these are just considerations and, you know, things to work out through -- more through with your staff. That way you don't -- you don't want to create a real barrier to further development, but an appropriate standard for where they kick in. We also recommended some administrative approval criteria for -- you know, ten percent, like basically an administrative waiver of ten percent of a numerical standard, which would replace your alternative compliance provision, which I read through and found pretty subjective and in my experience as both a regulator and an applicant in certain situations putting that onus on staff to have that subjective power can -- can be really -- can be really onerous for staff and it can also subject you to liability. So, a clear numeric standard that staff can provide flexibility for without going through a public hearing process I think is an important consideration just in the practice of -- of administering code. But, then, anything beyond that, another relief valve for a design review, that could be a design review board, could be your planning commission, could be your city council, where a public hearing is triggered for anything more than that. Now, this is for a waiver not a variance and I think that's a really important distinction. Variances are really high bar in Idaho code where you have to really prove that there is a steep slope or, you know, maybe a waterway where you can't meet a setback. A waiver is something different. It's just an important distinction legally. So, a waiver has a little bit more flexibility, less criteria to meet to have a waiver, because these are design standards, not -- not something that you want forgiveness in code, but something built into code to provide that flexibility. Okay. Now, the stage is set on the computer, building orientation and civic space. Get a little bit of water here. I just got back from a vacation, so here we go, hitting the ground running with Chris. No surprise. Right now I think your code requires minimum 40 percent, you know, building fronting a street. In the downtown we are recommending at least bumping that up maybe 50 percent, so that you have development on the street frontage, you know, with a zero setback, unless there is a dining area, plaza area or public art, something to help create that vibrancy. There is some exceptions in your code now I think for drive aisles and parking areas and that can kind of break up that comfort level and pedestrian experience of creating a destination that people want to be. So, these are, again, small tweaks that could go a long way. Corner lots. Corner lots, bellowed corner -- I know this is very detail rich and feel free to interrupt me at any time if you have a specific question about any one of these recommended standards and this is kind of an a la Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 7 of 24 carte, but some of these standards kind of go together. There is sometimes a carrot and stick that kind of are married together through these. So, beveled corner, you can see in the top right image, that's a picture of a building from Italy somewhere, but it's not dissimilar from some of the development you see around downtown Meridian today, some of the older development. And if you walk around, which we did quite a bit, you can see that these design standards really are intended to preserve and continue that trend of what makes a downtown a downtown, a place where people want to go. So, primary building entries face a street or provide pedestrian connection to them. Okay? Architectural components and you do have some of this for clarity. This would -- in the areas that you decide to apply this, which we are recommending the traditional city core one and two and maybe there could be some variation between those two, because they are a little bit different. So, this would replace your ASM manual as it's known for just this area at least, where -- and we -- we built in some material standards where it's not a -- but we have tried to consider it so that there is some room for additional materials, but the -- at least 50 percent of the soft facade materials can match what's there, so that there is some cohesion with the traditional building materials used in one more of the older style buildings. That could be brick, wood examples, but it's not limited to those specific materials. There is lots of affordable material options to builders to make them look like it and you see examples of that if you walk around downtown, where materials are mixed up and it works. I think The Lofts is a good example of where, you know, those building materials are mixed up. So, some clear standards for that. Consistently spaced windows. So, maintaining that opaqueness for ground -- ground floor storefronts, which makes window shopping, which makes permeability and creates that sense of visual interest for folks walking downtown or just experiencing downtown with similar shaped windows up above. Pitch roofs with eaves or if a flat roof a cornice on top, we are not going so far as to require certain types of detail, you know, to match a historic theme of the era, but just detail and, then, when you get longer buildings, breaking up the vertical facades can help maintain that visual interest and create that sense of comfort for pedestrians as well. So, we have recommended for every -- you know, over 50 feet maybe break up by two -- two foot differentiation. Again there is still relief valves built into this, but those are the standards that we are recommending and, then, blank walls that can be visible from a public area. This will happen unless you put some standard in there. You do have some, but, again, shoring up that, well, it could be a change materials, it could be some landscape screening or a mural, something to create -- maintain that visual interest and, then, a lot of other related considerations, which take them or leave them. I went through a use table and I looked at, well, what uses might not be compatible with, you know, creating that downtown sector, that people centric experience. One of them is maybe consider prohibiting drive throughs or at least certain types of drive throughs, which can create a huge traffic impact; right? Drive throughs can create -- generate a lot of trips and they also can compete with that pedestrian oriented feeling that a successful downtown will have. Limiting low density development. Moving or removing off-street parking for building use changes or for certain types of commercial or even all commercial. A lot of downtown areas are eliminating off-street parking. It sounds, you know, bold, but for commercial uses in order to encourage that redevelopment or reuse of existing buildings really considering the parking requirements, which can be a barrier to creating Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 8 of 24 the sense of vibrancy that is called for in your policy. Something to consider. I know you guys have been down this road already with parking discussions and I know that that raises a lot of red flags, but it's -- there are other options to consider without just wholesale eliminating parking. You can -- you know, there is a lot of -- there is variations on the theme there, but it's something to consider. And, then, shoring up your landscape screening where you do have parking lots facing the street and there is another provision that we found, which would allow 220 feet I think by your existing code with that 20 percent just administered, again, by staff, which, again, puts a really big burden on your existing staff to make that call and clear predictable standards, but with opportunities for flexibility. That's really all and I will turn it back to Chris, unless there are questions. I know I threw a lot at you to think about. Danley: Okay. Thanks, Aaron. So, just to wrap up, want to make sure we hit on a couple of points, but, again, the point of today and moving forward and so I know of a concern that was raised. What is it that we want; right? What is it that we want out of this exercise -- the previous exercise from last month. In this particular instance this -- this is definitely one of those -- the design standard is specifically that are administrated by the city; right? So, this is one that definitely needs to be blessed by you all in order for your code to reflect what we have discussed and reflect those visions that are, you know, adopted in the plan or put it forth in the plan and so we -- we go to get to that point if this document is to move forward that has been supported, especially for the last couple of years. So, that's really the end goal. In terms of the procedures with the time that we have left tonight, a half an hour whatever, happy to answer questions, happy to have robust discussion. Certainly I requested that Aaron be here in person to make sure we have, you know, all of that at our fingertips. Formally if there are comments that you want to put forth we ask that they go to staff, that staff be able to reconcile them, because I will just tell you I know my -- on my desk right now as we speak is still a stack of -- of comments that came from everything and there were definitely times when there were competing interests on the same subject. So, that reconciliation is important as much as possible. In addition to staff's comments as well, that, then, ultimately make their way to MDC and, then, us and MDC, because they are my client, work through those and -- and go forth in the document to make changes that are agreeable and, hopefully, get back in front of you for formal adoption and get this thing going. So, that's really more of the formal and informal for this evening and I think I just stated all that's on the screen. So, we are good. Happy to have just a discussion and answer any questions that we can do so. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Thank you. Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Chris, Aaron, Ashley, Dave, appreciate the presentation. Appreciate the roadmap, too. Helps me kind of follow where we are going. So, you know, I think one of the reasons why we are taking on this one this afternoon is there are some places where MDC is a certain stakeholder, right, of our downtown, where maybe there is some alignment with our planning staff, which are our subject matter experts, but there Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 9 of 24 are other places where maybe there is some delineation between the two. So, can you, Chris, maybe walk us through what are some of the areas that you have seen that maybe you and staff are -- our City of Meridian planning staff are not on the same alignment when it comes to design standard recommendations? Danley: Mayor and Council Member, honestly, I don't recall there being tremendous differences. Maybe you all have different recollection from that, but I don't -- I don't recall -- now, granted this was -- this exercise when we got comments was about a year ago, so I don't have all of those off the top of my memory, but I don't recall there being anything -- any comments from staff that were just massive game changers. There were some adjustments. There were some tweaks and revisions and I think that's only natural, especially with -- with the vastness that is this document as well as the visions and, of course, the standards, but I don't remember there being anything major. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I guess maybe I would ask the same question, then, to our planning staff, if they are in concurrence, if there is areas where they have got some concerns. Hood: Mr. Mayor, Council President Cavener, yeah, I don't -- tremendous -- I don't know. I mean there is a lot of good things in the plan. We certainly -- I think a lot of the tone of our concern about some of these things in here is -- and I know Chris touched on it again today -- is the outreach; right? We have the UDC focus groups, some of these standards -- we can call it standards -- there is a certain bar of outreach that we are expected to do as city staff before we just go and change code. So, I think a lot of our tone back to, again, Chris and -- and Ashley are what's the public involvement. I -- was at some of those events, but I didn't facilitate them. So, I just don't know, you know, how did we notice the public, what -- what kind of stakeholder outreach happened. You know, I do have a list of some things that are questions; right? Not necessarily concerns, but that's I think at the heart of some of the series of discussions is this is an elephant with Old Town stuff -- I think there is a lot -- again a lot of good things, I just can't sign off on them without having sort of that -- again, the public outreach and input that makes me more comfortable. I'm not saying they did a bad job, just -- it's just different than what we would do if it were a city led effort and I can go through a couple of -- height, right, is another one even with this topic that, you know, it -- that we have a maximum of a hundred foot in our city core and, again, there is only one now. This plan calls for two. So, one, we haven't even established some of the districts that are called for and so, then, that even kind of conflicts with our -- our comp plan map, our zoning map and some of those things -- shouldn't say it conflicts. It's just not consistent; right? Again, it hasn't -- we haven't established that TCC-2. It doesn't exist, so -- but along the rail corridor even some of the things like -- the property owners on, Broadway if there is a hundred foot building across from some of those single family homes, I don't know what the outreach was there, would they be comfortable with that. I get the concept and I -- I think this is a major asset that we should look at redevelopment. But if we all of a Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 10 of 24 sudden allowed a hundred feet by right and not allowing them some -- some -- I know parking, you know, for some of those industrial users and things can be an issue. So, if we just allowed, you know, was Pro Build or any of those customers to just go -- just build a hundred foot tall building without some other conditional use permit or oversight, there is just some of the concerns with how this would actually work and if -- if we are even on the same page with the vision and the goals of some of these things and we talked about some of that conflict, right, as you move further down. That's really where I'm still at is are we on the same page with even some of the vision that's portrayed in this document? So, I'm not saying we can't get there, but there are some of the things there -- you know, the residential parking zones, that's also called for in this section of the plan. Is that something we want to adopt and implement? We have talked about that briefly a little bit last time, not -- not a ton, but that's something here, too. It talks about creating residential parking zones. Danley: Can I just address the last piece real quick if I might, because I just -- I think it's important. I think it was brought up at the last hearing with regard to the residential parking permit. Just as also a reminder on that, in the details of that that's a residential led initiative point, you know, end of story. That in the recommendations of that it's not a -- an establishment thereof that comes from the city, it's more of a grassroots desire amongst -- I think the threshold was 75 percent of residents would need to come together in order to craft that. So, just as a point of clarity, because I think I missed that at our last meeting, so just to point that out. Simison: And just to piggyback off at least what Caleb said, from my perspective -- you know, just my perspective if there is anything in here that is a change of code I would expect it to go through our own city processes. I don't see us, you know, adopting anything that doesn't at least follow our normal elements from my perspective. Cavener: I guess, Mr. Mayor, what I'm hearing is that there is maybe not necessarily a -- then a conflict of recommendations, the conflict is in the process in which these recommendations would be approved. Is that -- is that your understanding? And, if so, then I guess what would be the best way to have a collaborative process that is, you know, following the city's way of doing business, but is paying respect to that work and effort that's went in from MDC as a downtown stakeholder to bring these recommendations to us. Simison: And my two cents is if -- if you are in general alignment with the principles of this and you turn over to the planning department and let them go run their processes, because this is your starting point for your general community feedback and it may be a very quick process, because everyone says, you bet, one hundred percent, we are -- we are already bought and sold on these, what's taking so long, dumb city, you know. but it could be the first time they have heard or seen it. You don't know and -- by the time you get to it. But that's, you know, a very generic way that I have looked at it through this is -- and, yeah, to Caleb's point, I -- one of my very basic questions is is this eliminating the Old Town district in theory -- the Old Town zoning. Is this overlaying, repealing -- I mean there is process questions in there, especially if you start doing Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 11 of 24 some of that and I don't know that I have heard or seen the answer to some basic questions, let alone, you know, others. I'm not looking for an answer right now, I'm just -- Danley: For what it's worth I think that the Old Town zoning is great. In fact, I think some of my -- just is just Chris talking -- take the consultant hat off. I would love to see the city take Old Town from the freeway to Fairview. I think it would take away a lot of ambiguity and if that's the desire to be downtown, then, you have a zone that is pretty awesome at making that downtown. I think that the design standards certainly align even more so with the suggestions of what the vision for Old Town has been and maybe some of the modifications that have come through with this process through significant input, including yours last fall and through the process. But, ultimately, I think that that Old Town zone is -- is pretty good. One question, though, is as I mentioned from the outset is asking people what Old Town even is you get different answers. Legal answers. Historic answers. Cultural answers. Geographic, you know, answers. So, there is some challenge there. Simison: So, maybe just to the simple one. I say simple -- height. I mean there is different standards for height in all these different areas. How do you apply that to Old Town? Is it a separate overlay that people have to go look at, they look at Old Town and, then, they have to realize that there is another layer of individual components or would you leave everything in Old Town, create separate areas and update all the standards? What's -- what would be the recommendation of either staff or yourselves or -- McClure: Mr. Mayor. So, I guess to Councilman Cavener's previous comment, I didn't have a lot of concerns with overall standards, the process to get there and Council support, on the other hand, is different. So, we were before you three years ago and we didn't have marching orders to do this so we -- we haven't done anything. I would want to hear Council say do this and -- Mayor and Council say to do this to standards and, you know, how we do this, Mr. Mayor said it spot on, like is it an overlay? What is it? We don't currently have alignment between zoning and future land uses or between zoning, future land uses, and some of the areas identified in this or the previous Destination Downtown documents. In order to put everyone on an equal playing field, i.e., not have someone do extra standards for Old Town and instead choose to do residential where you don't have any standards, you have to either do an overlay or you have to do a rezone. One of those two things has to be true. Does that answer the question about overlay or rezone? Those are your options if you want everyone on the same playing field and you don't want to disincentivize Old Town. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Strader. Strader: Maybe switching gears briefly. Reading the plan, the biggest theme that I think was missing from the plan or just something that I -- I think might deserve a bit more Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 12 of 24 thought or explanation is I think it's really important and what makes Meridian different is that we are a really family friendly community and I want to make sure that the downtown area is oriented toward families. You know, I think a lot of cities have done a good job. Copenhagen comes to mind. But I think there are others where like every plaza has an opportunity for a micro playground or a micro play structure or some kind of an experience that I think can draw families in and help them interact with the space better. That's just some feedback on something that I would have liked to see a little bit more -- I think is more of a family theme. You know, I -- I think it's natural that the urban environment is going to be geared toward younger professionals and it's going to be geared toward, you know, potentially older residents as well, they are looking to downsize and want kind of more vibrant life, but it also should be -- should be a place where families can feel comfortable, interact with the space, make it a really fun experience. So, that is just something I felt was missing that I would like to see a little bit more of. I also had some I guess questions about the process and it feels to me like at some point we should be having a public hearing, like that definitely feels like, yeah, it needs to be part of the process and, then, that gives opportunity for the business owners to come and weigh in and I agree I think you have had a lot of great -- like stakeholder engagement. I just think it may not have met the -- the typical level that we would see with like a city wide code change. So, that would be a suggestion. I'm very sensitive to the -- I guess the areas that you have marked for neighborhood enhancements and I kind of wanted to drill into that a little bit. So, what would the maximum height be in those neighborhoods under this plan? I wasn't really following that. Danley: Thank you, Mayor and Councilman Strader. I don't think we even touched on the height changes in the neighborhood enhancement. Strader: No. Danley: There is no recommended changes in terms of height, I think we just simply said that the promotion of in-fill and going up to two story, which is already allowed, is ideal. I think if anything we went to maybe 35 feet, which two and a half stories, you know, maybe a third story, but, really, it's not even going to that point. It's mostly about in-fill, enhancing those areas to your point about -- especially your first point about the families and maintaining that presence. It's critical that we not necessarily, you know, do the very things that could force people away from the home that they have been in, you know. So, that's definitely part of the mantra there. So, we don't really touch that. Strader: Yeah. I -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: That's where I think the public hearing process and more of a city led process I think could sort of tease some of that out, because I agree with the planning staff, I think if you have a situation where -- there aren't a ton of places where I think that interface would occur here, but it certainly could, where you may have a five story building pretty Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 13 of 24 close to, you know, single family residential or you might have a hundred foot building that's not that far. I can't think of a better way of running families out of town than having such a contrast and I think we need to think about how to transition to those neighborhoods, so that -- I just think that's something that we need to work through. I liked the human centered design elements. I liked the festival street concept. I have been a fan of that. I think that's beautifully done and thought there were a lot of good ideas there. I even -- I liked a lot of the details around beveled corners. I just -- I -- what I'm -- one thing I am concerned about, though, that I'm sort of trying to figure out is I think what you are asking for is a change to our typical processes as a city. So, you know, for example, getting rid of alternative compliance. That's a big change. And I have a hard time I think with doing that in just one area without considering if that makes more sense as a city wide initiative like for example. So, there are just some things where I'm struggling a little bit with having a different process for -- for this area specifically when it -- if it's a good idea it may be something that we should just consider; right? So, that -- that's something -- design review has become a big topic for us lately, especially in my district we have had just some acute situations that have come up. I think it honestly is -- is just circumstances, but, you know, a design review board, for example, that's an interesting concept to me, you know, but that's something that we could leverage I think to solve wider issues potentially. So, I'm really looking for our staff I think to try to take the plan, take our existing process and kind of give us a road map as to a way to marry them together. So, I'm interested in figuring out how we could accomplish that. Sorry. I'm kind of jumping around a little bit. But I guess that's just some initial feedback. I do think there are a lot of really good opportunities around, but there are things like the pedestrian infrastructure and bike lanes, for example. Like as a city our philosophy around biking specifically and how to handle that, we really embrace like detached multi-use pathways, for example. That might be more challenging in the downtown environment, but how can we, you know, make sure that we have buffered like separated bike lanes, for example, things like that. So, I just think there is more -- there is more to tease out and more to talk about, but for me the mean -- if there was one thing that I felt was a little bit missing it was that family focus. So, I guess I would challenge you a little bit to think about that. And I generally like the plan. I do want to say that. I generally like the plan. I felt it's moving things in a positive direction, but I just have real concerns about how to marry this plan up with our process and ideally I would like to not have a totally separate process for this one area. I just think that's very inefficient and ideally if we could avoid that. That might be best. Hood: Mr. Mayor, if I can just real quick. I -- there is so much in the plan; right? I even was guilty of talking about parking, which we have already sort of covered that in this area, or design standards in that -- it's going to be different; right? I mean there is a bunch of things about enhancements that the parks department should -- like I'm not volunteering to say let me lead that effort about making downtown parks; right? So, there is so many things that other departments would even have to get into. If we are going to adopt the plan we need to -- and it's not just the planning department, I just want to put that out there. I'm not necessarily volunteering to go and update the parks, you know, master plan. There is a -- there is a lot of things in here and on the agenda today we are talking about design standards and that process. I guess I just want to Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 14 of 24 kind of put that a little bit back in context. Not that I don't appreciate all comments on this, so I'm going to be quiet here in a second, but I just want to put that out there. Really our comments back mainly should be about city code, the comp plan, the vision and those design standards that are -- that are called for in this plan. That's -- there is other things we need to talk about at some point, but today I think it's mainly about the design standards. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Maybe. But I have a different view. Sorry. I read the plan as kind of a theme, like so -- when I read this plan -- like everyone's different. You are -- no offense, but you are a planner and so it makes sense to me that you would focus on the design standards, whereas I read the plan and I care about the design standards, but I'm also saying, okay, are there themes of focuses I think are missing or that need to be more of a focus and so if I have a comment like I think, you know, ensuring that public plazas and public spaces include some type of a micro playground or some type of family friendly environment, whether it's planning leading the charge or whether it's parks that gets involved -- I mean there -- I think there needs to be a city wide effort for sure and I don't mean to say that like your department would be uniquely responsible, but I still think if we don't comment on those themes when would -- when would we? Hood: That's a fair question and I will just say -- sorry, Mr. Mayor. It's a fair question. I think when we had the -- one of the first conversations with Council it's how do we start taking bites of this element? Is it by area? Is it by topic? Is it -- how do we -- you know. And so I just want to -- on the agenda today it says design standards; right? And, then, we are talking about Old Town and design standards, so I think, again, all comments for my -- are welcome. Like whatever information you want to share. But I just want to -- lumping them all under this umbrella of design standards and, then, planning running with that. So, I hear your questions. There is just a lot in the plan that I think we need to fully understand as we move to the next topic, that those things -- fully. Whatever that means. Simison: Might go to -- Councilman Taylor, who is unmuted, assuming he had a comment on this topic. Taylor: Yeah. Thank you, Mayor. I got a handful of comments. I do have one question, though, for -- probably Aaron a little bit and, then, I have some comments. But my question is about parking a little bit and I know we had this discussion last time, but to me this is an interesting topic, because I really embrace the concept of making this more of a walkable pedestrian friendly part of Meridian, as opposed to, you know, some of the other locations and I think that's going to be an important distinctive component of downtown Meridian. So, can you talk to me just a little bit more about the suggestion of removing off-street parking requirements? And I just wrote some notes down, so I might be missing part of it. Help me understand from your point of view to make downtown Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 15 of 24 Meridian a little bit more pedestrian friendly what you would recommend we do in terms of parking downtown. Not so much where to park, but how to kind of accommodate that pedestrian friendly parking and sort of, again, removing off-street parking requirements -- I'm not sure exactly what you are recommending with that, so if you could maybe elaborate just a little bit on that. Qualls: Well, thank you for the question. You know -- and I will be honest, off-street parking requirements was a little bit of scope creep for me in the design standards, which has really been my lane. But they do have -- there is a real nexus between how much surface parking you require and the intent of the design standards, which is to create, as you said, that -- that pedestrian friendly environment. So, what I kind of baked in is just alternate, you know, additional considerations, just from my view of doing an audit of your code and listening to people at public engagement events, not necessarily a full blown exempt parking -- off-street parking requirements, you know, within an area, although a lot of cities have done that for their downtowns, not just for the -- to create a more pedestrian friendly environment, but also to maintain and enhance your tax base, because parking lots don't generate a lot of tax revenue. Buildings do. Improvements do and in my experience developers -- even if there aren't parking requirements, particularly for residential uses are going to want to provide parking, so that they can market their units. But for commercial uses specifically I noticed that a change of building use -- an existing building, you change it from an office to a restaurant, boom, you have to put in ten more parking spaces. That means either paying exorbitant fees if you have an in lieu fee or it means knocking down another building, which over time can diminish your -- what a downtown feeling is, which is, you know, a compact, dense, walkable environment. So -- and, really, you know, this -- this is just ideas to get the ball rolling, to get the wheels turning by your planning commission and you are absolutely right, it should be driven by your staff. It should be a city process and not only should there be a public hearing, but probably several workshops with your planning commission and staff driving this. That's how it should work and maybe even additional broader public outreach about this. So, you know, rehabbing existing buildings to create -- to incentivize repurposing buildings and investment in your downtown and to -- to maintain -- not just eliminating park or reducing eliminate -- reducing parking requirements, but also the standards by which you allow for surface parking to the side or behind with that street frontage, so that buildings are closer to the street, which slows down traffic, which makes it more comfortable for pedestrians and interesting, you know, which is paired with those, you know, details of breaking up floors and incentivizing canopies and pedestrian amenities. So, I don't know if I fully answered your question, but that's the thinking behind it. And Chris can add to that. Danley: I just have an example that might illustrate the point on this issue. If McMenamins came to Meridian tomorrow and said Cole Valley Christian, that's an amazing, historic building, is something that we have our eye on and we would love to come to Meridian and be the first McMenamins in the state of Idaho if you are aware of McMenamins and what they do. An amazing company that does historic preservation and makes a place that was once an incredible thriving cultural valuable place alive Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 16 of 24 again; right? If they came to you tomorrow and said we love that building, we want to turn it into a small restaurant, 20 room hotel, whatever else; right? But the parking standards require that we have 50 off-street parking. We only have 40. What are we going to say; right? Are we going to force a part of that parcel to somehow be, you know, bulldozed if we have to in order to accommodate that? That's I think a way to illustrate that. I know in downtown here the church was -- I don't know what the status is, but the church was discussed as being for sale. What if that became a concert venue tomorrow? That's an amazing addition to downtown; right? But if that parking part of things trips us up, that's I think what Aaron's trying to illustrate is that what flexibility may we have in order to get some of the things that we know and want to have in downtown already family friendly; right? Talk about some of those types of things that could come with some of those adjustments. Qualls: Can I just -- if I can real quick on the -- on the bike thing. I just want to remind everybody that as we were doing this process ACHD had their plan as well that was going concurrently and so we did work together to -- to ensure that both were informed. So, I just wanted to remind everybody of that. Simison: So, are you saying you are going to deliver us a McMenamins area? Qualls: That has been my dream from the beginning of this project. I love that and we were in Bend -- my family was in the one -- Bend not but a handful of months ago. And I think that would be an incredible place for the first in Idaho. Simison: And I want to get back to Councilman Taylor. I don't want to take over his time, but in a response to another question when you get into it, like, okay, that's good for today, but what happens when you are in Washington DC around Adams Morgan and you have no place to put cars anymore? Well, what's your threshold for when you say, okay, we are going to take that standard away? But Councilman Taylor to you. Taylor: Yeah. Thank you, Mayor and Aaron and Chris. That -- that is helpful, because I do think, again, that -- that parking strategy that we did ultimately need to sort of settle on -- as a city is going to be important when we are considering some of these design elements. Overall let me give some feedback. I actually really appreciated this document. I thought there were a lot of good suggestions. The way I read it in relation to how we as a city should interpret it, I feel like you are challenging us to think a little deeper about what we want to see; right? And I think maybe it was Brian had mentioned, you know, three years ago, you know, we -- there was no specific challenge for the city staff to necessarily start working on it, knowing some of this was happening and I see this as very helpful in the process of challenging our thinking what we want to see. I -- I do think what we are going to have to do between this document in the city is we are going to have to kind of sit down and really spend some time clarifying what we specifically want to see; right? Building heights along the -- you know, the rail corridor. An overlay or a rezoning change. All these things I think is actually going to take a lot more work and I agree with everything that was said previously by staff and Council Woman Strader mentioned it, too, like there has got to be a lot -- a little bit more of a Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 17 of 24 public process where we are inviting that information. But overall I really like this. I believe one thing that we really should focus on as a city that would be helpful is -- is creating really the -- having what we call -- I'm losing my word -- sort of a downtown street festival area. Maybe that's the wrong word. I'm losing my thinking here. But having something that draws people downtown I think would be very helpful and would really spur on that. So, I appreciate having you focus on that, but I -- again I think everything that was shared tonight is helpful. I'm very supportive of what I'm seeing, but I want to rectify that with a more robust public input into finalizing things. But I -- I think what you have done for us here has really accelerated a lot of our work and giving us a really good product. So, I do appreciate it. I think -- I think some of my specific questions will probably be better served for when we are actually getting down to, you know, what do we want for building heights. Is it a hundred feet? Is it 75 feet? I think -- yeah, I think that's probably my comments for now. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Playing off the backs of the other comments that have already been said and some pretty good ones, first off I would like to commend Caleb for his comments about how we require our planning staff to vet out different things when it comes to standards, because the first thing I got concerned about when we were talking about the standards is I didn't hear that we have representatives from our development community, whether it was residential, business, industrial, you could have been in this room a week ago and that was incredibly valuable information that we got last week that if we hadn't had it we wouldn't have been able to make the decision that we made going forward with changes to our standards. So, it's very important that we hear from them, not just the homeowners, but we hear from that development community, they play a great role -- and we do require that when they do their meetings and they invite them and they come to the table. Danley: Can I address that real quick, if I may, Mr. Mayor and Councilman Overton? We were -- we had a full on development subgroup and there were particular members of downtown who were part of the process all the way through, because they just wanted to be. So, they -- that whole concept of property owners, business owners and their staff was definitely a piece of the information gathering process specific to Old Town at a focus point and throughout. I didn't mention that. That's my fault. Overton: Mr. Mayor. Not the owners. Developers, the ones that are going to be coming in here and making the changes. They are going to be bringing in something new. That's the ones -- what I -- what I don't want to do is -- is -- okay. I'm going to say it. No offense. But when I read this document I felt like I was playing Sim City. I was taking this incredible document and looking at this part of our city and saying, wow, what could I turn this into. But the problem is I have lived here too long. I remember what's there now. And in one of the first pages is respect Meridian's history. Define that for me. What do you mean when you say respect Meridian's history while promoting a modern downtown? Because that's a really good sentence, but I bet it means a lot different things to a lot of people. Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 18 of 24 Danley: If that's a question I would be -- I would love to answer it. So, that's the challenge and so to your point that's like -- for example I'm just going in a very specific detail, but to Aaron's point with the chamfered corner, as an example. That's been around for hundreds of years beyond Meridian; right? But respective of the existing neighborhoods and the history that's gone in there, certainly trying to maintain some of that -- I think some of the building materials that you might expect to see in downtown are indicative of that. At the same time there is the desire and need to modernize and to continue to grow into the directions that are acceptable and that what we heard from, you know, all the folks that were involved in this. So, you know, even -- another example outside of design standards and Old Town, as you move north there is definitely language in there with regards to the residential businesses and the -- the neighborhood commercial activity that takes place from the north part of Carlton up toward Fairview and the recognition of the value -- the EPIS of the world and all the others, that that is an amazing asset for downtown Meridian and should be preserved and it's why we kept that in terms of the recommendations of just, yeah, this is great, let's keep this type of a thing, because it is unique to you, you know. So, I think we tried our best to try to balance that, but also recognize those development pressures and -- and the modernization of approaches that we are -- we are seeing and even in cauterizing some of your plans. So, as much as we could. Overton: Mr. Mayor, follow up. So, I appreciate that, because when I was reading part of the plan talking about the rail corridor and it talked about where our city hall was located and talking between our city hall and the rail corridor, it kind of eliminated Zamzow's and I get it, that's -- that's Meridian 75 years ago. But it's part of our history. I look at that and I -- I appreciate that. But, see, I remember when Clint Eastwood came to town and filmed a movie here. The Hungry Onion still stands where he shot the movie. The Speedway still stands where he shot part of his movie. We lost Farmers and Merchants State Bank where he filmed the bank robbery as part of that movie. But those were iconic things that happened in our city over time and I hate to see us discard some of our past and some of our history in the interest of modernization. I struggle to find where that common ground is between where you want to modernize and where we want to leave the way things were. I mean Meridian Meat and Sausage has been in this community for decades. It's not going anywhere. Renee just retired and turned the business over to his son and he plans on running that for another few decades and I would like to see that happen. So, I struggle with looking at your plan and how we are going to -- those beautiful pictures you show and some of even the streetscapes out of Kirkland, Washington, how -- you are going to do that here. Danley: Yeah. And I don't know that even the last iteration of Destination Downtown was able to answer some of those questions, because it is a difficult one. Even in the concept of the Speedway there is so much discussion within the community of what happens with the speedway. It is historic, but for others -- and I'm not saying this, so don't hit me, but others would argue that it's a different thing, because of its noise and the activities that sometimes can come from it. So, historic preservation, as well as future growth and the planning that goes -- can often butt heads and it's painful and it's not easy. You know, I think that as much as we could try to preserve some of those Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 19 of 24 spaces, but recognize that the market forces and the property owners and developers also have a private property right to do certain things, are also part of that conversation and it is definitely not an easy line to walk. But we have given it a chance and that doesn't mean it's perfect and it doesn't mean it's not amenable to the types of things that I think were brought up tonight and maybe the next time we are here and after that. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor. First of all, Chris and Aaron, great project, great report. Thank you so much. Really tiny question compared to some of the things my fellow Councilman have brought up, but I was really surprised with the recommendation to go just for pitched roofs, probably because right at the moment it seems like we are getting a lot of people that want -- we -- I think I saw a pergola on the top of Keller and Associates building. Flat rooftops with event space or common space seem to be kind of the trend from what I'm seeing. Qualls: Thank you for that question and opportunity to clarify. So, there wasn't a recommendation for just pitch roofs, but where pitch roofs are allowed to some standards for them and where flat roofs are proposed, some standards for them, really decorative cornice. So, there is options for both, just some minor standards for each what was -- what I try to put in there. So, we are not excluding one or the other, but just so that they are done in a way that doesn't -- isn't out of context with the rest of the downtown. Little Roberts: Great. Thank you. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Yeah. I have a question. It's maybe for staff and maybe even for you, Mayor. think there is a lot of work to be done to kind of -- for us to get -- figure out exactly what the design standards are going to look like. So, I guess my question would be if -- if we get to a point where we sort of dial in on exactly what we want to see, do we want to do it through an overlay, a rezone, or by amending the Comprehensive Plan what -- what's sort of the better process by which we might want to actually nail down what these design standards would look like? And I'm curious staff -- feedback from them from a sort of practicality and, then, maybe even from you if you have some thoughts on that. Simison: I can honestly say I have no thoughts on what's the best approach then. Defer one hundred percent to staff. Hood: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. And Councilman Taylor. So, we have thought about it and, honestly, I think it may be a combination of all three of those and that to me is Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 20 of 24 some of the crux of the question. Are all of these things that are called standards in here that also recommend -- recommendations, are those things we want to standardize or do we want to encourage and promote and do some of those other verbs that really lead towards the vision, but it's not in black and white that thou shall or shall not, so think that's some of what we need to figure out. So, some of those things that aren't prescriptive standards, but we want to encourage and promote, could go on the Comprehensive Plan and, then, kind of like depending on what happens. What we can't do is design standards in our Comprehensive Plan if we are going to have standards those need to either be in our code -- well, they need to be in our code or put -- you could put them as an addendum to the code and cross-reference our architectural manual or -- or downtown standards. But, again, I think it's some combination TBD and I think that's part of what we need to fully understand is how many of the things are baked enough where we can push them forward to public hearing versus need to be talked about more and we explore these things more and maybe eventually they turn into code or standards and maybe they are longer term things, like Brian and I were just talking like -- again, I like a lot of the things, but if our design standards for downtown say a building along the rail corridor has to be a minimum of 75 feet and have doors that face the railroad, I don't think that's going to be received well; right? If those standards aren't for the hearing now we are going to get pushback. So, we need to understand where we can have alternative compliance or design standards exceptions or whatever that process looks like or is that something that just says we really want you to think about embracing the railroad corridor, because it's coming whether it be with, you know, bus rapid transit or commuter rail or light rail or something -- or just a park even along there -- really try to embrace that and encourage it versus requiring it. So, I think that's where, again, staff is kind of in the middle. I don't want to say things are bad, it's just how do we take them to the next step; right? And have those dialogs. Simison: So, I want to get to Council Member Whitlock before we go down this road, but maybe be thinking about this real quick. If you look at the appendix -- if you look at the items in the appendix -- staff, I think if you went through and were able to identify where you would recommend the changes and I think that starts with the overlaying, you know, do you create additional overlays or not? I think that would help answer some of the questions through that, but don't give us an answer now. Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: Mayor and Aaron and Chris, thanks. Let me just preface what I'm about to say with the fact that I have spent more than half of my adult life working in downtown Boise and I have never thought about design standards in -- in the last 35 years as I have worked in downtown Boise, but I did this weekend after reading your document. At some point in the early 1900s they built the Idaho State House and next door they built the Federal Building, which is now the Borah Post Office. Two very majestic buildings. It seems like nothing else really happened until about 30 years later when art deco seemed to be the -- well, 20 years later art deco seemed to be the style. So, you had the Hotel Boise, which was the Hoff Building now. You have the old Ada County Courthouse, again, in that art deco style -- design standards I guess that they were trying to meet or look that they were going after, both of which don't appeal to me Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 21 of 24 today, nor 30 years later when they started building out the rest of the downtown core area in that government complex with the Hall of Mirrors, Len B. Jordan Building, the State Library, the State Supreme Court building, are all very vanilla to me, both inside and out and so as I read this plan and looked at some of the recommendations, whether it's, you know, the exteriors of the building, the heights of the building and, then, I looked at the renderings of the trail and rail corridors and -- to Caleb's point where doors may face the railroad or not, I'm familiar with Salt Lake City and their light rail system and, you know, they have just got fencing and it's kind of ugly as it meanders through Draper and Murray and everywhere else and I like the idea of trying to make that inviting, I just don't know how you do that with design standards and rail coming through the middle of your city. I like the renderings. I like what you put there. I just don't know that we can, A, do it safely, efficiently, have it be affordable. So, again, some questions on -- as we look at the design standards what ultimately is it that we will -- will see. Back to what I prefaced all of this with. Downtown Boise, as I stood there and looked around, some of those buildings have withstood the test of time, 120 years later they are still majestic. We are still proud of what it -- what they have accomplished and -- and that's what I want as we kind of look to the future of Old Town to Councilman Overton's point, I want that history, but I also -- if you go back to your very last slide, I didn't have a problem with anything that I saw in that slide. I saw the new complementing the old. I saw streetscapes. Didn't see a lot of backup traffic in the roads or anything. So, that you have addressed the traffic problem in your picture. Those are the kinds of things that -- that I would like to see, rather than a cavernous hundred foot tall buildings lining our rail corridor. I don't know how to get there with design standards. I appreciate the thought provoking report and what it's caused me to do and reflect upon. I think we do have some work to do and definitely feel that there should be some public input there. I love what you said in the report in terms of we want downtown and Old Town to be a go to rather than a go through. A 110 percent on board with that. I don't know that I necessarily agreed with some of the comments in there. One of the comments on page 24 was there is little to no appeal to passersby to stop and see an accountant, legal services or financial services and those are exactly the same -- the things that would bring me downtown and cause me to take my wife to lunch after we turn our taxes in. So, think about those kinds of things that allow us to go to and stay and -- and be a part of downtown. Just my comments. Thanks. Danley: Appreciate it. Hey, if I can just touch on the -- one of the -- a little bit of the rail part of it if I might and that is just -- it is not easy to do that, but you all have been leading the charge on this very issue with the rail with trail, very much a family friendly desired use that connects not just Meridian, but places east and west. So, that vision is already moving forward and so I think what we try to do is complement that vision by not only on the land use of the adjacent parcels, but a linear park space, because at some point what is the future of the rail. That's a fundamental part of this discussion; right? We just don't even really know. But also the human element part of this document is intended to make that even more vibrant and to create an experiential location to, then complement some of the design standards that not everything is going to be the hundred story or hundred foot -- definitely not a hundred stories. Sorry. Hundred feet. There is going to be variation. But imagine being able to go to a restaurant that sits Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 22 of 24 outside looking at a green space where people are riding their bike in downtown Meridian; right? And that's -- that's the kind of vision that we are trying to not only put forth in the document, but hopefully memorialize in some meaningful way with the design standards to complement and some of the other things that I can't really wait to get to, like the human experience chapter, maybe because I'm selfish I love that part of it, but just some of that stuff that's I think to be determined. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. The rail corridor is a really interesting tough challenge, but has so much potential. I mean I liked where you were going with the linear park space and I -- and, obviously, the rail with trail has been something that we have been exploring for a long time. I think -- I think the push and pull of that is -- and just a concern is if we end up with buildings that if we proactively say, hey, look we want to see like eight story buildings, we want to see our density along this corridor, how do we do that in a way that kind of preserves like light and air and a park like feel, because I could see it turning into just kind of, you know, masses of really tall buildings and, then, you have all the issues of shadows and it creates like a lot of challenges. So, I was kind of curious about how you are thinking about that in the pedestrian element and how -- how can -- you know -- and I know you talked about pedestrian crossing, but kind of wanted to drill down into that, like how do you foresee that functioning, you know, is it a combination of fencing for safety and, then, you are -- you are going to have like specific crossings with kind of safety elements like -- that -- that's something I wanted to understand and that's a good example. Like maybe that whole stream of work is something that we kind of direct toward parks, for example; right? Like maybe one way to -- I'm just trying to brainstorm of how we could be proactive and trying to move it forward from a practical level. Like, you know, maybe if you had just a listing of, okay, from your perspective these are the top priorities in changes in design standards that you want to see in order. These are the biggest changes that we think are the most important and you -- and you sent us that, maybe we could all kind of weigh in and say -- this is what we do a lot with our code changes. We sort of say, okay, these ones we feel like we can move these ones forward. These ones we think need more work. I mean there will be a public hearing process no matter what on any changes. But maybe that's one way to do this is just, you know, prioritization of design standard, changes from your perspective and, then, I think it will be important for you to separate out changes you are requesting in our processes, because that I think is very different. I'm just trying to brainstorm, but maybe that's a way we could try to move this forward from a practical level. Is here is our updated prioritization of design standard changes we want to see you consider and here are the things that are actually process changes and departures from how you normally do things and maybe we could tackle it that way sort of separating those out and we could create some work streams where it's like, okay, we do think parks needs to take on these items, send those over to that commission and that department, maybe there is a way to tackle that. It's a weighty document, so I think that's part of the challenge. I'm very open to that though. I think -- I do think like having staff spend time Meridian City Council Work Session August 26,2025 Page 23 of 24 on this makes sense like. I -- I do want to say that. I think -- but I do think we have to get into a more practical framework for how to move these forward specifically, because it's a beautiful document, but, then, there is a lot of verbiage, but it's like at the end of the day I think, honestly, your bullet points here are a good example of like here are some design standard architectural components and if you are saying, okay, you know, our number one priority is -- you know -- and it doesn't mean that there aren't multiple priorities, but, hey, these are our top priorities, then, that might help us -- that might be clarifying for us. Just a suggestion. Simison: I think we knew that the -- that the first two that we bit off were the two biggest and this one was going to be -- well, one is a -- the first one -- I think the parking is a different type of animal. This is the animal that we knew was going to be the most intensive in terms of trying to figure out where to go from here and, then, we are nearing the end of our workshop and, you know, I don't want to -- I think that this is one of -- next month. I don't want to get too far away from this and just move on to the next one. I would recommend to Council we bring -- they have staff take this feedback and contemplate some of the things about what would move forward in what ways and the next and also Council to give feedback after this conversation to staff on any of their thoughts, so we could continue this specific conversation next month to lay out a process on those elements that we think we -- to answer those questions. But I kind of -- staff needs further guidance on -- even from Council on some of the elements to -- before they can even make those ultimate decisions and I want you all to make sure you have time to take what you have heard and think about it. Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I -- I agree with you on that and I think I would maybe also encourage you and staff to take it one step further, which is be maybe doing some of that -- whether it's a -- it's a pre-meeting with either Council members or the liaison or you, Mayor, or sending a memo to the Council, so that we are not having to kind of have you -- the process introduced, have it take a month for staff to evaluate -- I mean staff have had the Destination Downtown plan for at least as long as we have, so rather than piecemealing it month after month, if we could have them come more prepared with some of those questions as we are taking on these topics each month I think it would make us more efficient and see that move forward. Simison: I think we can start with them telling us -- looking just at the appendix items, where they think that they should be addressed and what questions they need answered in order to address them. You know, what are the overarching things that they want Council's feedback on. I think -- I mean the biggest is overlay or reset standards for Old Town amongst it. And, then, you can get into the conversation about height specifically if we want to when we have -- when we get to that right time of the conversation. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Meridian City Council Work Session August 26, 2025 Page 24of 24 -- -- E. 9-9-2025 -9-9-2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the August 12, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session August 12,2025 Page 26 of 26 Overton: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn the meeting. All favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:50 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 8-26-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 08-26-2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the August 12, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council August 12,2025 Page 61 of 62 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:35 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 8-26-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 8-26-2025 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Compass Charter School Gymnasium Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT- 2025-0087) Project Name or Subdivision Name: Compass Charter School Gymnasium Water Main Easement Number 01 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type. See instructons(checklist for additional information, 1160=11 WIMISJUMM11111 Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-055313 Boise, Idaho Pgs= 6 cfowler 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO $0.00 Electronically Recorded WATER MAIN EASEMENT TITIS Easement Agreement made this 26th day of August 20 25 between Compass Public Charter School, Inc. ("Grantor") and the City ofMeridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and set -vice said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water MaMS over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and 13) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all tines. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by a'! d between the parties hereto, that after inking repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee sh It r�e"stoii6tfib','4 ' "' 'went and rea' 'of the ' e asC adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repajrs.�and, maintenance;� However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right -of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01 /0 1/2 024 Instrument # 2025-055313 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 2 of 6 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the IawfuI claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Compass Public Charter School, Inc. STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on +V1 date) by W IV / . (name of individual), [complete the following l si ring in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Compass Public Charter School, Inc. (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: ( Ndrn tnWTq =p(type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below 4ien',a'rbornpson Notary Signature C Ofi7liliMiOD Numlaev 2.0:?.S� 0� i ,0 NOWY f ublr My Commission Expires: ob2 I state of Idaho Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 Instrument # 2025-055313 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 3 of 6 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis , ayor 8-26-2025 �! Attest by Chr' Johnso `°` Clerk 8-26-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 8-26-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-055313 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 4 of 6 • I DA H O 9939 W Emerald St Boise, ID 83704 s SURVEY Phone: (208) 846-8570 GROUP Exhibit "A" City of Meridian Waterline Easement Description For 4667 W. Aviator St. The following describes a parcel of land for purpose of a waterline easement located in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; From which, the South Quarter Corner of said Section 10 bears, South 89015'34" East, 2640.54 feet; Thence, North 43°10'41" East, 1067.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence, North 00036'35" East, 20.00 feet; Thence, South 89°24'46" East, 7.66 feet; Thence, North 45035'14" East, 8.52 feet; Thence, South 89024'46" East, 74.62 feet; Thence, South 00035'14" West, 28.00 feet; Thence, North 89024'46" West, 27.52 feet; Thence, North 00°35'14" East, 8.00 feet; Thence, North 89024'46" West, 38.82 feet; Thence, South 45035'14" West, 8.52 feet; Thence, North 89024'46" West, 15.95 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described easement contains 0.05 acres (2,036 square feet), more or less. Page 1 of 1 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 5 of 6 6, z° o N 0 n o Z N N O N N Q • O L[7 � � O i _� O C C O fn O w O O o Q) +j \ Zt Q m C .° I >Vo � r �3i 0 0 _ !q`9ti-�! -•. - vo_i •iI I ,I III II I I 1 J� 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 6 of 6 s89°24'46"e 74.62 s89°24'46"e c 7.66 � 3 M ao n COO N M M N O O N 38.82 n89°24'46 w 0v 15.95 e� M 10 n °24'46"w o 27.52 n89° 4'4 w N t, Q 7/15/2025 Scale: 1 inch= 12 feet File: water ease.ndp Tract 1: 0.0467 Acres (2036 Sq. Feet), Closure: n00.0000e 0.00 ft. (1/110670), Perimeter=238 ft. 101 n00.3635e 20 08 n89.2446w 38.82 02 s89.2446e 7.66 09 s45.3514w 8.52 03 n45.3514e 8.52 10 n89.2446w 15.95 04 s89.2446e 74.62 05 s00.3514w 28 06 n89.2446w 27.52 07 n00.3514e 8 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Little Creek Subdivision No. 2 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0094) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-055314 Boise, Idaho Pgs= 52 cfowler 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO $0.00 Electronically Recorded I' a - . to - 1 6 of - Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement Number: _ Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only ESMT-2025-0094 Record Number: SAM:[ARY EMIRAMAATERMA.1-NEA$I.-W-.,-N—T THIS Easement Agreement made this 26th day of August 2025 between Little Creek Partners, LLC ("Grantor") and the City ofmeridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right -of- way zcross the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: rL4 a WAJ 0 VAX M I a _ an Wgaml owe or-J111411141 - .I. sewer and water mains ana ineir alneu lacilifies, 10gCL110F WIL11 L Mal litelfance, repair replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. T 0 HAVE AND T 0 HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 0 1 /0 1 /2024 Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 2 of 52 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: jss County ofAda ) See Attached for Notary Seal This record was acknowledged before me on 3_�-, I `f Z Z- (date) by {name of individual), (complete the following ifsigning in a representative capacity, or strike thefallvwing ifsigning in an individual capacity] can behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 3 of 52 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validi of that document. State of California NEVADA County of On a2 � before me, KEITH ALBERT ERICKSON, NOTARY PUBLIC /0(insert na a and title of the officer) PIn Y personally appeared kT / c f gfatr who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evid n&4tn be the person(r4whose name(&) ishare- subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his/herft6r authorized capacity(' , and that by his/fta4their signature(s) on the instrument the person(; or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. KEITH ALBERT ERICKSON WITNESS rn hand and fflcial seal. %ph gP�bliccal Nevada county — r commEVVes . .. .ozr (Seal) Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 4 of 52 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN 8-26-2025 SEAL Attest by Clfis Johns ty Clerk 8-26-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 8-26-2025 date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Cha&ycWo-q 11) �j Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 5 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDON _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 35, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 39°37'03" East, 849.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 89°59'19" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 00°00'41" West, 26.52 feet; Thence North 89°59'19" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 00°00'41" East, 26.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. The above -described parcel contains 530 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. ^J,ohn J. hea, PtS-155528 �O�'P '' c.� _FGxST1 Q - -2.0Z,5 Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 6 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 wS .�� FUTURE LOT 37 Ws Ws WS Ws T Ws Ws POINT OF BEGINNING N00°00'41 "E 26.52 FUTURE LOT 36 S89 59 19 E 20.00 JLO S00°00'41 "W 26.52 op U) Y L1J L1J N89°59' 19" W 0[f 20.00 U W J FUTURE LOT 35 J r 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET r--00 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 35 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W—S--Esmts EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 7 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 36, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 30°34'40" East, 736.21 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°58'05" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 00°00'39" West, 27.08 feet; Thence North 89°59'21" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 00°00'39" East, 27.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 542 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. tf :John J. }Shea, PL5,45528 Date Page 1 of 1 0.1-17_ zoze5 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 8 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 s o� F 0 FUTURE LOT 37 ws ws ws ws ws ws ws ------ ws ws SANITARY SEWER AND ws WATER MAIN EASEMENT /NST NO. 2019 095157 POINT OF BEGINNING N00°00'39"E 27.07 N89°58'05"E 20.00 S00°00'39"W 27.08 N89°59'21 "W 20.00 FUTURE LOT 36 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET r--00 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 36 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FIL2ID 24-043 We,e S.—Esmts EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 9 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 38, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 40°56'00" East, 818.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 89°47'29" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 00°00'39" East, 23.60 feet; Thence North 89°59'21" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00°00'39" West, 23.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 471 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. ,,John J. Shea, P�6�15528 , t q-� - 2oz Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 10 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 I so. <11 cp FUTURE LOT 39 \� E. WILSON LANE S00°00'39"W--"�- 23.53 FUTURE LOT 38 N89°59'21 "W 20.00 �N00°00'39"E 23.60 wS wS POINT OF BEGINNING f ws ws ws w� ws ws Y 1S9T�� �9/VE��� 1D S89°47'29"E 7- 20.00 FUTURE LOT 37 09��8 r 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET r--00 EXHIBIT "B" FUTRE LOT 38 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W—S.—Ellis Ex CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 11 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" r FUTURE LOT 39, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 36°54'54" East, 760.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 74°27'52" East, 20.01 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 13°37'07" East, 27.00 feet; Thence North 76°22'53" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 13°37'07" West, 26.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 533 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J. Shea, P'LS-15528 OJ-i-7- 2. Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 12 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 E. WILSON LANE J / 4 L / DL t WS WS WS WS 20.01 FUTURE LOT 37 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT INSL NO. 2019-095137 ------------- LAND s r r 0 30 60 � o P� SCALE IN FEET i tiN SNP Of- 17- t07-5 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 39 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., =LE:10.24-043 W—Sll-Esmrs EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 13 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDON _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 40, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 33°20'26" East, 714.13 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°55'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 00°00'39" East, 21.49 feet; Thence North 89°59'21" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00°00'39" West, 21.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 430 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J. Shea, hs-1�5528 Date { — Z 7- 2ol, q� Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 14 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 F FUTURE LOT 41 r--co 1:&491�Y01,11W_1kqI FUTURE LOT 40 FUTURE LOT 39 \ N89°59'21 "W 20.00 S00°00'39"W N00°00'39"E 21.52 21.49 POINT OF BEGINNING ws ws WS T— ws ws ws SAAIITARY SEWER AAN N89°55'44"E WATER MAIN EASEMENT 20.00 ws ws MIST. NO. 2019-095787 FUTURE LOT 37 ws� r 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTRE LOT 40 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 We,eS--Esmts EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 15 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDON _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 41, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 28°14'29" East, 677.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°55'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 00°00'39" East, 21.49 feet; Thence North 89°59'21" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00°00'39" West, 21.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 430 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J. Shea, PES-15528 Date Page 1 of 1 -17- 2°V 5 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 16 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 E. WILSON LANE \' � FUTURE FUTURE LOT 41 LOT 40 FUTURE \ LOT 42 °59'21 "W Q \ L � N w LA O � � S00°00'39"WN00°00'39"E 21.5221.49 020,1 U0 0 POINT OF BEGINNING ws ws ws ws ws ws ws ws N89°55'44E SAAOTARY SEWER AAA) 20.00 WATER MA/N EASEMENT MIST. NO. 2019-095787 N FUTURE LOT 37 I I r r--00 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 41 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W—S.—Ellis Ex CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 17 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDON _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 42, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 22°36'24" East, 646.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°55'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 00°00'39" East, 21.49 feet; Thence North 89°59'21" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00°00'39" West, 21.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 430 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. `John J./ hea, PAS-15528 o'--1- Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 18 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 E. WILSON LANE I I II II FUTURE �a FUTURE LOT 43 LOT 42 N89"59'21"W Q �II 20.00 � � N O c� N � N � O � N U o O O J N Z r--co FUTURE LOT 41 S00`00'39"W N00`00'39"E 21.52 21.49 J I- - - POINT OF BEGINNING ws ws ws ws w ws ws ws ws ws N89`55'44" E..... SAAOTARY SEWER AAID 20.00 WATER MAIN EASEMENT FUTURE LOT 37 MIST. NO. 2019-095787 I � I � r 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 42 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 wa,eserv-Ellrs Ex CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 19 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDON _ MAPPING�--- -- _7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 43, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 16°28'23" East, 622.41 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°55'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 00°00'39" East, 21.50 feet; Thence North 89°59'21" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 00°00'39" West, 21.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 430 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. `\ John J. $hea, 'PL__15528 a'--Il- z Date -j-17- Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 20 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 61 FUTURE LOT 44 \" Q 0 ry w N � O S00°00'39"W N 21.53 N � N U o 0 POINT OF BEGINNING Z wS ws jl� N89°55'4411E 20.00 FUTURE LOT 37 r--00 I:RTiRIwo] kgIA_1il1 FUTURE LOT 43 N89`59'21 "W 20.00 I —N00`00'39"E 21.50 _ -1 L FUTURE LOT 42 WS WS ws ws WS WS SANI/ARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT /NST NO. 2079-095737 q'i 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 43 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 We,e S.—Esmts EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 21 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 44, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 13°59'30" East, 615.15 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°55'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 00°04'16" West, 26.51 feet; Thence South 89°55'44" West, 59.21 feet; Thence South 00°04'16" East, 20.00 feet; Thence North 89°55'44" East, 39.21 feet; Thence South 00°04'16" East, 6.51 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 1314 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declarpA -null and void. ti. i 'John J.,Shea, PL,S15528 Date ci., j — 1 Z07-5 Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 22 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT T 8 E. WILSON LANE 5��, FUTURE LOT 44 FUTURE LOT 43 S9, S S89`55'44"W S00°04' 1 6"E 59.21 20.00 \ N00°04' 16"W 39.21� 26.51 N89°55'44"E S00°04' 1 6"E 6.51 �s ws ws ws — J N89`55'44"E SANITARY SEWER AND 20.00 WATER MAIN EASEMENT POINT OF BEGINNING INST. N0. 1019-095187 FUTURE LOT 37 r 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET r--00 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 44 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 We,e S.—Esmts EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 23 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 45, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 12°23'47" East, 649.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°55'44" East, 20.78 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 15°42'22" West, 24.68 feet; Thence South 00°12'13" East, 3.41 feet; Thence South 89°47'47" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 00°12'13" West, 6.20 feet; Thence North 15°42'22" West, 21.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 561 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. `\ John J.1Shea,`PLSS,15528 0 -11® 2. Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 24 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 \ S 17 X,F \ 6Q F FUTURE LOT 37 ws ws ws ws ---- --- --- SAN/TARY SEWER AND N89°55'44"E WATER MA/N EASEMENT 20.78 /NST NO. 2019-095137 _ _ POINT OF BEGINNING / Q N15°42'22"E S15`42'22"W o ry 21.82 24.68 N w > 0 rr,O N00° 1 2' 13"W S00° 12' 1 YE 6.20 3.41 N N � � N v S89°47'47"W o 20.00 � z FUTURE LOT 45 FUTURE LOT 46 LAND S T f RF SG� � O G 0 30 60 r `` 0 P� SCALE IN FEET oyNF OF J. S � �tp_OZ� EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 45 ��LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT _f A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., C1�HIE ,..24-0<3 Wa,eserv��eEsms Ex CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 25 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 46, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 15°41'07" East, 658.51 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°55'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 00°04'40" East, 14.36 feet; Thence South 27°03'36" West, 18.37 feet; Thence North 62°56'24" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 27°03'36" East, 13.54 feet; Thence North 00°04'40" West, 9.53 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 558 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. LAND IX 'John J S"hea, PLS 35528 � © of Q Date h'� d C Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 26 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 IN S \F 63. \'S>, ws ws J POINT OF BEGINNING N 00° 04' 40 "W 9.53 N27°03'36"E- 13.54 i FUTURE LOT 45 r--00 N62`56'24"W 20.00 wS FUTURE LOT 46 wS wS wS wS wS SANITARY SEWER AND N89°55'44"E WATER MAIN EASEMENT 20.00 INST. NO. 2019-095IS7 FUTURE LOT 37 S00°04'40"E 14.36 I � I --S27°03'36"W 18.37 I I I I 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 46 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 We,eS--Esmts EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 27 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 47, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 13°05'13" East, 805.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 89°47'47" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 00°12'13" East, 14.46 feet; Thence South 89°47'47" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 00°12'13" West, 14.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 289 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. `,John J.)Shea, PLS-15528 Date ,41w17-2Q Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 28 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 IN S S0S SEM ws TARP �N EAj 1 g� N89°47'47"E SAN R Mj�s 9- 20.00 � v' No 201 - ws ws ws ws� ws POINT OF BEGINNING NST N00` 12' 13"W S00` 12' 13"E FUTURE LOT 37 14.46 14.46 Q FUTURE 0) LOT 37 S89`47'47"W N O 20.00 c� N � N U) O � N U o � O J N Z FUTURE LOT 47 FUTURE LOT 48 LAND S T E,? SG� � O G r 0 30 60 A 0 P� SCALE IN FEET oyNF 0 J. S Q �+7_07- EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 47 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 We,er8eM7—, EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 29 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 48, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 17°56'12" East, 934.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°23'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 20.44 feet; Thence South 34°23'44" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 55°36'16" West, 20.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 409 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. `,John J.,)Shea, PL315528 Date —17- 2o�'5 Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 30 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8\ S\ IQ FUTURE LOT 47 � I Q 0 ry � w N � O tY c� N � N � O � N UO O J 0 cn z FUTURE LOT 37 / �A o N34°23'44"E / 20.00� POINT OF BEGINNING A �S55°36'16"E 20.44 FUTURE � LOT 50 S S34°23'44W S55°36' 16"E 20.00 FUTURE 20.44 / LOT 48 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET r--00 FUTURE LOT 49 L ANC \ O TF OF \o P AF EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 48 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., E:,0.24-043 We,eS--Emis EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 31 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 49, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 18°04'57" East, 932.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°23'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 21.08 feet; Thence South 34°23'44" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 55°36'16" West, 21.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 422 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J. rhea, PILS�15528 Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 32 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT FUTURE cy �v� �� LOT 37 17 F' N34°23'44"E '�� g� 20.00/ S55`36'16"E 21.08 POINT OF BEGINNING �I o ryQ 0 w N � O lY U N � N U) O � N U o � O J c z r r--00 N55°36' 1 6"W 21.08 FUTURE LOT 48 S34°23'44"W �S 20.00 FUTURE LOT 49 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET FUTURE LOT 50 FUTURE LOT 52 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 49 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 33 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 50, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 18 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 19°39'37" East, 913.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°23'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°19'29" East, 21.18 feet; Thence South 34°40'31" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 55°19'29" West, 21.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 423 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. " ,,John J. J. Shea, hs-15528 C)4-1-1- oz Date 01 z17-ZID Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 34 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 FUTURE / LOT 37 S55° 19'29"E 21.18 N34°23'44" E-7� 20.00 POINT OF BEGINNING \ ,N55`19'29"W 21.08 FUTURE LOT 48 r--00 / S34°40'31 "W 20.00 FUTURE LOT 50 FUTURE LOT 49 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 50 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 35 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDON _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 51, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 27°11'33" East, 987.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 34°40'31" West, 25.89 feet; Thence North 55°19'29" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 34°40'31" East, 25.79 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 517 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. t John J. Shea, PC5--15528 '--l-1— 2 cad., Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 36 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 \ i -9 8;1 ks, POINT OF BEGINNING S55°36' 1 6"E 20.00 N34°40'31 "E FUTURE 25.79 LOT 50 / S34°40'31"W 25.89 r r--00 N55°19'29"W� 20.00 FUTURE LOT 37 / / FUTURE / LOT 51 / FUTURE / LOT 52 / 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 51 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 37 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 52, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lots 18 and 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 23°46'48" East, 1103.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 34°23'44" West, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 55°36'16" West, 26.97 feet; Thence North 34°23'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence South 55°36'16" East, 26.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 539 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J.,iShea,ryIPE$,15528 '--i - z Date Page 1 of 1 0} 1 7- to5 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 38 of 52 6 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 A6 7 r r--00 FUTURE N34°23'44"E LOT 52 20.00 FUTURE LOT 51 kS N55°36'16"W 26.97 S34°23'44"W 20.00 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET FUTURE LOT 37 S55°36' 16"E / 26.97 / POINT OF BEGINNININ G cy FUTURE LOT 53 EXHIBIT "B" FUTRE LOT 52 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 18 &19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 39 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 53, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 25°35'56" East, 1125.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°23'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 21.97 feet; Thence South 34°23'44" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 55°36'16" West, 21.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 439 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. ;; , ';John J. rhea, PL5-i5528 Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 40 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 77 F / 'S / N34°23'44"E / BS, 20.00 / / POINT OF / BEGINNING / FUTURE LOT 37�� FUTURE / LOT 52 r r--00 S55 36 16 E 21.97 FUTURE LOT 57 S34°23'44"W �s 20.00 �s N55°36'16"W 21.97 FUTURE LOT 53 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET FUTURE LOT 54 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 53 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 We,eS--Esmts EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 41 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 54, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 25°41'13" East, 1124.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°23'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 21.97 feet; Thence South 34°23'44" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 55°36'16" West, 21.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 439 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J. Shea, OLB_.15528 04-I-1- Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 42 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 / ���C'e N34°23'44"E 20.00 P� s2sQ / P� / POINT OF / BEGINNING FUTURE / LOT 37 / r r--00 S55 36 1 6 E 21.97 FUTURE LOT 57 S34°23'44"W s 20.00 �s N55°36' 16"W \ 21 .97 �s FUTURE LOT 53 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET FUTURE LOT 54 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 54 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 43 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB J-U B COMPANIES i�i�. MAPPING _ MAPPG _.� GROUP ,•;+ INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 56, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 32°43'55" East, 1190.16 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 40°04'50" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 49°55'10" West, 26.50 feet; Thence North 40°04'50" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 49°55'10" East, 26.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 530 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. '\John J,)Shea, PL -15528 Date 01_17-ZaZ05 Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 44 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 s� �� FUTURE F o��s� LOT 37 V 7190 �� .76, POINT OF BEGINNING N49°55 10"E 26.50 S40°04'50"E FUTURE 20.00 LOT 57 \ \/ N40°04'50" W S49°55' 10"W 20.00 26.50 O o z o �I o LU > m N O � U) N FUTURE w N LOT 56 w o U o cn uJ z w F E— LAND S T f RF SG� � O G r 0 30 60 0 P� SCALE IN FEET oyNF °F J. S Q -+74oZ EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 56 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-171ceE 1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 45 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 57, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 27°12'13" East, 1108.36 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°23'44" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°19'29" East, 21.96 feet; Thence South 34°40'31" West, 20.00 feet; Thence North 55°19'29" West, 21.86 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 438 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J.)Shea,'RLS.15528 o'--l- Z Date Page 1 of 1 —17- 202-5 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 46 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 FUTURE LOT 37 �s 'o /N34°23'44"E / s�� 20.00 / S55°19'29"E 21.96 POINT OF �S BEGINNING/ S34°40'31 "W 20.00 LU N55'19'29"W LU 21.86 / FUTURE N U / / LOT 57 N U) N U 0O O N Z FUTURE LOT 53 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET r--00 FUTURE LOT 56 EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 57 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 47 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 58, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 33°43'25" East, 1117.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 16.47 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 42°35'39" East, 3.62 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°23'44" East, 27.65 feet; Thence North 55°36'16" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 34°23'44" West, 26.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 538 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. yr, ,\John J. Shea, BLS 1 5528 C)4-I- v Date 1— 17_ Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 48 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 �I 0I r--00 0 Q 0 o' w O c� H U) D U O J II U, FUTURE LOT 59 IS& F26.833 44 W .7 POINT OF BEGINNING s S55`36'16"E `` 16.47 S42°35'39"E �s 3.62 N55°36'16"W FUTURE 20.00 LOT 58 N34°23'44"E 27.65 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 58 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 49 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 59, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 33°00'46" East, 1083.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 20.00 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 34°40'31" East, 26.62 feet; Thence North 55°19'29" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 34°40'31" West, 26.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 533 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. John J. Shea, PLS_�'5528 04-i`1- Date Page 1 of 1 0} 1 7- to5 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 50 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 I \ FUTURE o LOT 60 o_ o `p �I o °Q 0 10 w N i O tY c� N � N � N U o O O J c z r--co POINT OF BEGINNING S34°40'31"W 26.72 FUTURE LOT 59 N55° 19'29"W 20.00 � / LOT 58 FUTURE � / N34°40'31 "E 26.62 S55°36' 1 611E4 20.00 4S FUTURE LOT 37 �s �o�7s r 0 30 60 A SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 59 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 51 of 52 GATEWAY CJUB/ J-U B COMPANIES V�. LANGDDN _ MAPPING�---_7 GROUP '�`� INC. J•U-B ENGINEERS, INC. EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LOT 60, LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER SERVICE EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION A portion of Lot 19 of Pleasant Valley Subdivision (Book 12 of Plats at Page 665, records of Ada County, Idaho), situated in the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 8 from which the west quarter -section corner of said Section 8 bears South 00°26'22" West, 2649.67 feet; Thence on a random line, South 31°12'33" East, 1031.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the water service easement to be described, said point being on the boundary of that certain Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement recorded under Instrument No. 2019-095187, Records of said Ada County, Idaho; Thence along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 55°36'16" East, 3.85 feet; Thence continuing along the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, South 71°06'53" East, 16.29 feet; Thence leaving the boundary of said Sanitary Sewer and Water Main easement, North 18°52'17" East, 26.33 feet; Thence North 71°07'43" West, 20.00 feet; Thence South 18°52'17" West, 25.30 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and the end of this easement description. Containing 525 square feet, more or less. END DESCRIPTION This description was prepared by me or under my supervision. If any portion of this description is modified or removed without the written consent of John J. Shea, PLS, all professional liability associated with this document is hereby declared null and void. ,John J. Shea, h5 15528 Q'--ll- Date Page 1 of 1 a 2760 W. Excursion Ln, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 p 208-376-7330 it, www.jub.com Instrument # 2025-055314 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 52 of 52 6 1 5 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 7 8 FUTURE LOT 36 I OCS. �I Q 0 ry w N i O c� N � N � c N UO O J O C/') z S 18*52' 17" W 25.30 \ POINT OF BEGINNING wS S55°36' 1 6" E Ws FUTURE LOT 60 N71 `07'43"W 20.00 FUTURE LOT 59 3.85 ws v S71 °06'53"E ws v 16.29 v� FUTURE i LOT37 r r--00 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET L ANC \ TF O F �O o6w J EXHIBIT "B" FUTURE LOT 60 LITTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 NUB CITY OF MERIDIAN - WATER SERVICE EASEMENT —--- A PORTION OF LOT 19 OF PLEASANT VALLEY SUBDIVISION (BOOK 12, PAGE 665), J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. SITUATED IN THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CAD FILE. 10.24-043 W-s-l-E-1 EX CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: W. Villaggio Way Black Cat Connection (Grand Mogul) Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0101) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-055316 Boise, Idaho Pgs= 5 cfowler 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO $0.00 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Electronically Recorded Grand Mogul - Black Cat Connection Water Mains Easement Number: of Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project conlalns more than one easement of this type. See instruclionstcheddist for additional information. For Internal use only ESMT-2025-0101 Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 2fAb day of August 20 25 between C4 LAND LLC ("Grantor") and the City ofMeridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly hounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after malting repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right -of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 0 Instrument # 2025-055316 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 2 of 5 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: C4 LAND LLC 1979 N LOCUST GROVE RD NtEftIDIAN, ID 83642 STATE OF IDAHO ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by {name of individual), [complete the following i signing in a represe .ta iv capacity, of s" ti ike the following if sr.'gning in an individual capacity] on behalf of (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Pftq -t _(type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below ►•`'•• � LAAZ -'1ypTAR y *.••�00 oIPIJBLIC" "' Notary Signature My Commission Expires: " 3 "+� Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 m Instrument # 2025-055316 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 3 of 5 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert . Simi on, ayor 8-26-2025 �! �E � SEAL Attestby C s Johnso'';x ity Clerk 8-26-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was aelmowledged before me on 8-26-2025 (date) by Robett E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Cleric, respectively. Notary Stamp Below CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO 4NaotarySiZgnature 3-28-2028 yComssion ices: Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 W Instrument # 2025-055316 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 4 of 5 Project No: 230640 Date: August 19, 2025 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT A WATER MAIN EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Center West Sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the West Quarter corner bears N.89°14'36"W., 1322.75 feet; thence, along the south boundary of said SW1/4 of the N W 1/4, A. N.89014'36"W., 572.64 feet; thence, leaving said south boundary, B. N.00045'24"E., 37.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, 1. N.89014'48"W., 20.00 feet; thence, 2. N.00043'00"E., 42.98 feet; thence, 3. S.89017'00"E., 20.00 feet; thence, 4. S.00043'00"W., 7.71 feet; thence, 5. S.89017'00"E., 10.00 feet; thence, 6. S.00043'00"W., 20.00 feet; thence, 7. N.89017'00"W., 10.00 feet; thence, 8. S.00043'00"W., 15.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 1,060 Sq. Ft. �NpL LAND a C 13765 70 L�- 8/79/25�� 9� 0 F 0' MA`���1 332 N. Broadmore Way , ID 83687 208.442.6300 Instrument # 2025-055316 Page 5 of 5 I r m BLACK CAT ROAD m o o o O i z 0 c 0 C) TI TI (n rn D r OC OC n > m N C O O M — o 0 r O rn > Ui co Z z N M D Z o rn 0 O rn Z D D 0 O -� ; o z O = Z w z O x O PRO oCOK ZD = f�Pf CO CO 5Kz mm W O m p c ' cn ��Cn cn 2 m� - m� �qyo un Z (A�' cn ? ,Zrnj N RI A o N N cn (NJ1 � o Z yM M n* --i -q� m cn oO j 71 cn m M m0 K � _' m L3 5 z Z cn z Z —I N �r- M 0 t D - L1 � n __ �I O �r L7-j lrcn � z D � O n � O N I� O c � Im � z � N W o�zN D z o-0 m y /v =3 s o -n vwr�irn X 4 a j T� 3 o r t0 r OD r �I r O r � r -P r Crl r N r Z rn cn z cn � cn � z z z 0 00 0 0o O ao o ao o r o co o co O cfl o co o W w w w m Z � � � cam,., ��� m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0��� D m � rTi �i � cn O O O v p N O �I � D c0 O O O - O Oo O J � rn U Nco E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Oil Changers Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0103) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-055315 Boise, Idaho Pgs= 6 cfowler 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Project Name or Subdivision Name: CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO $0.00 Electronically Recorded Oil Changers Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easementatthis type, See Instructionslchecklistfor additional information. For Internal Use only ESMT-2025-0103 Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 26thday of August 20 25 between Northwest Christian Credit Union ("Grantor") and the City ofMeridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right -of --way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right -of way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right -of way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01 /2024 Instrument # 2025-055315 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 2 of 6 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, .shall cease and become null and void and ofno further effect and shall be completely relinquished.. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. G qx Northwest Christian Credit Union STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) Thi ccord was acknowledged before me on i -s2c�(date) by �r-I Z F- o name of individual) , [complete the fallowing Z signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Northwest Christian Credit Union (name of entity on behalf of wham record was executed), in the following representative capacity: type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below JDNiVI MANSFIELD COMMISSION # 20212523 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ICAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES W2112027 �i 2! 1 Ct,'1.5-L � LcL Notary Signature My Commission Expires: a 7 Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-055315 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 3 of 6 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis r 8-26-2025 SEAL Attest by Chris Johnson, STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) Clerk 8-26-2025 This record was acknowledged before me on 8-26-2025(date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Starnp Below CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Notary Signature My Commission Expires: - . -28-2028 Water Main Easement Page 3 Version Q 1/01/2024 Instrument # 2025-055315 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 4 of 6 MY23"2025 Project No..24 OOR City of Meridian Water Easement Exhibit A Xparcel of land for a City affvleridlan: Water EasenaRnt situated 1n:the 1$6Kbvve.st'. .1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 4jownship 3 N.arthRarigel:East, Wse-Merid'ianCity of MerldWi, Ada scatty, Idaho and, being. MDrd particularly deWi bed as folloWs: Commencing.at,afoufd aluminum cap mafkIng:thesouth 1/4 cornerofsaldSectlon4, which bears N89"2311nW a dMance of 2,65,8,61 feet frdm a fDUhd brass cap 'matYAftgtie SoUtheast Coroor of said Section 4, thema. following t4e-southerly Une of`sajd'Southwesti/4 of the SoL6e.ast 1/4, 8-99623'1 f E ai diSto nco of 89G;83 feet; eet; Thencejdavlhg said zutherly1lne, NOV21'20"E a-distance'of 59.01 feet to a -found 518-Inth reNt maMbgthe. soutmastzorner of a parcal of land aWesoribed In Worraotv:tipped per instrument No. W!"'Mzs. Thence followirtg said Warranty Deed boundary, UW35'17 E a distance-- of 21626 feet; Thertci leaAnpald Warranty Deed low dart', NBT24'4vWerdlstance'of 9.33 feet to arrexIstlag water easement per thstrument. No" 105152705 andbein.gAe POINT OF KrGINNWO. 1. N89d2A!,44n.W a distance of-30=16et; 2. 500"35'16PW a;clistance of 2.6.1 feet; 3. N89'24U,W a distance of199 feet; Thence leanings -aid existingwater easernenti N00'3516"t a distance of,9.58 feet; Thence.589924'44"& a d1staftee of 33,99 feetk Tivaoe SQT,35'WW a distance of 137 feat to the POINT 6F.BEGI NNING. Said prcel contains 26isquare.fed, More, or les�, and is subject to all existhi.0ase mrant. 3,ndj6:r righU-,of-way of record orimplied. All.-sUbdividont, deeds, recotds- of survey$, and otberhistrumebts of tecord WOrotimd he r6n:'ar.s recotdied docurnents of the county in, wfilch: these doLscribed len# ao Otulated. Attached hereto is Exhibit 3 -and her this reforence Is Made a part hereof. 6725 Wart h biscoverv:Wav,4 Salto, idsho 03713 a 208,639MU a kMe-rt9((0-ja*M Instrument # 2025-055315 08/27/2025 08:28:23 AM Page 5 of 6 VENTURE SUBDIVISION, .z. tolt 14., BLOCK 1. LOT 13., BLOCK I J_ LQ d Nag-204"W %�_NSI?24�44"W. POIWOF J (TIE) LINE TABLE LINE BEARING : DISTANCE Ll' t0d'35."l W'W 2.61' LZ N 89.'24444"W :�.qw L3- W00'35:'16,'E 'a-ai LEGEND Northwest Christia-41. Credit Union APR:51104438650 Warranty Deed per I rist, N _m 2024008128 SRC CAP -ALUMINWA CAP 13 GAWUIATED POINT 0 6,/W' REIAAR — — —SECTION UNE BOVNWY UNIF —AWACENT BOUNDARY LINE WSURVEY -TIE UNE EASEMENT UNE SOUTHMT CORNER 1. 4MMM. 4 )F -OMM� 6CEMENT �01 T SOU 001�W BASIS. OF SEAR ING �H 4� SEOMON, rairview.Avenue 20, W. 60 .. .......... E. N 0.114 " r EE r !SN7MZ NOWNM-H DISCOVERY W City of MeHldlaft Mt Or Eiggern, le-ht tkv, 2as PROJEtp W&UNOWWWWWWW"� 4 of SHEET; A parcel of land situated in the SoUthwest 1/4,0fthle SoUtheasit 1 OF -1 Sn N.,R-1E, Boise MerCi ty y af Meridlaq, AdaCoup ty, ID. ectio41 T.9 Instrument # 2025-055315 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Pickleball Court Subdivision (FP-2025-0017) by The Land Group, Inc., located at 4050 W. McMillan Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: AUGUST 12, 2025 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: AUGUST 26, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 14 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0017 LOTS AND 4 COMMON LOTS ON ) 4.58 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-4 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT PICKLEBALL COURT ) SUBDIVISION. ) BY: MACY LUI, THE LAND ) GROUP, INC. ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on August 12, 2025 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING PICKLEBALL COURT SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4N, RANGE 1 W, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2025, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 5/12/2025, by JAMES R. WASHBURN, PLS, SHEET ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(PROJECT NAME—FILE#) Page 1 of 3 I OF 3,"is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated August 12, 2025, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(PROJECT NAME—FILE#) Page 2 of 3 interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 26th day of August 2025. By: Robert E. Simison 8-26-2025 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 8-26-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. 8-26-2025 By: Dated: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(PROJECT NAME—FILE#) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CJfER1D1AN4-_-, DEPARTMENT REPORT IOAHO HEARING 8/12/2025 Legend +. DATE: ® Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council :::Area of Impact i= City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis J 208-884-5533 Iritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Macy Lui,The Land Group,Inc. SUBJECT: FP-2025-0017 Pickleball Court Subdivision LOCATION: Located at 4050 W. McMillan Road, at the northeast corner of N. Joy Street and W. McMillan Road, in the SE 1/4 of the 17r SW 1/4 of Section 27, Township 4N, Range 1 W. Parcel No. SO427346800 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Final Plat consisting of 14 single-family residential building lots and 4 common lots on 4.58 acres in the R-4 zoning district for Pickleball Court Subdivision. B. Issues/Waivers None C. Recommendation Staff recommend approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. D. Decision City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing Zoning R-4 VLA.2 Proposed Zoning R-4 Adopted FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential VLA.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential Note: City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Pickleball Subdivision FP-2025-0017 (copy this link into a separate browser). City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2022-0025) as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The submitted final plat is for the second phase of construction for the approved preliminary plat;therefore,the proposed plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development: H-2022-0025 (AZ,PP),DA Instrument No. 2022-084263 and TED-2024-0011. 2. No building permits shall be submitted until the final plat for the associated phase is recorded. 3. The final plat shown in Section VI.G,prepared by The Land Group, stamped on 5/12/2025 by James R.Washburn, shall be revised prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, as follows: a. Note#6: Revise the lot numbers as they have changed with the revision of the plat. b. Note#10: Include the instrument number for the CC&Rs. c. Note#11: Include the instrument number for the permanent ACHD easement. d. Remove Note#12 as it appears to be a repeat of Note#11. e. Note#13: Include the instrument number for the City of Meridian Public Works easement. 3. The Landscape Plan prepared by The Land Group, dated May 8, 2025, and signed by Michael R. Thomas is approved as submitted. 4. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-5 for the R-4 zoning district. 5. The rear and/or sides of homes visible from W.McMillan Road(Lots 1-4) shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 6. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC I I-3A-7 and I I-3A-6B, as applicable. 7. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 8. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 9. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC I I- 3A-15,UDC 11-313-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 10. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 11. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years of the date of approval of the preliminary plat(August 9,2026), in accord with UDC 11-6B- 7, in order for the final plat to remain valid; or a time extension may be requested. 12. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. B. Meridian Public Works SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Water mains need a casing when crossing gravity irrigation that limits access to times of the year or is constructed out of concrete of clay piping. Either provide casing or proof that the City will have access at all times.Also provide the materials of the irrigation line. 2. Ensure no permanent structures (trees, bushes, buildings, carports, trash receptacle walls, fences,infiltration trenches, light poles, etc.) are not built within the utility easement. 3. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 4. The bottom of structural footing shall be set a minimum of 12-inches above the highest established normal ground water elevation. 5. Maintenance of any irrigation and/or drainage pipes or ditches crossing a lot is the responsibility of the lot owner unless such responsibility is assumed by an irrigation/drainage entity or lot owner's association. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development.The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff,the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing,landscaping,amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-413. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development,and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6.). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. C. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=393904&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X D. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=405611&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X V. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommend approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. B. City Council: Approved City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action 1 � -R* EN'.ct Location of Impact _ Analysis e ITH r �:- 1 r C--HINDEN • � _'_�7liiiiin I��ii�r IllfYr�tr.11\�I/l kl'��11+1nl1fl 1•���i1i:i -'rlll• - •• +arau ii 111E►�� .��.�?�p�r„ Q ■ n�e laYr 1nrtr rY{iir�Yi�� rwe 'r=,11�ruual.n■.►`';;.' mi i.eiils � UlnupYY■■ �.r:r ' �y qmu��un � Rnm ulsun�r Q 1 unu►��1iun.�lE : rii•'iiii"=ion ! n ::.el�ll lllllnf�IS mm..r ISO r rry,Neff j - 11 __ WIN., � •.1 . �■SIB����III 11���1�1��� MCMI�L_-!AN --m n ■°len a lul+�1�w�J%iiiig4•` rrk7l:ii - area?3'e 1 mml �Tiuu 1 nAlY e�rn1 �1+��in ' Omni ,.rrrh.-plrh� •� fhrn Y1f.111 Y I 1► �+EIa■�' •t+rlfR�� -Iln nr� r +flIRR CIII� I •► t.nal r- nls'`-=1 /lilepl F ur�Galnuq r ,1,11' fn Bd ���n unu►'�ri�'u allow- h +� r ,N11, F!1 'lvuffn�Nr�'ins a•rnnmlR+r a�1na coon�nl r■alunq � {I !'iRY'lun•Ipy i {� s Legend Project Location oolong/J. ry r:III111111r� - _ --__-` •.-• iiiiiiiiil••��� 4 i-• of •• . ��•■{���r n�•r il,llll y..'n r -._�._.--Y '._ ,.nriij -m ::riIg11P111:fIlllln y, - • r{:::'::�'.rhr ;;I,i�:iii•i7r'•►�LS• Analysis `� ri_� '.Nfh. ram._�Hn_fu�����,■.:��:��n1�.111u_y N%� r..,.nnurlrur.rl..�I:�f ram\:::�::1:�:;�:�::ri nnri�.,nr- .��Mrnu• �■-�-./• �•IrL�_ rrlN Ulrl.- Hr. Illy Iq:.-IO fl+!'vluNbna�i: 11Y lull! -��_Rur��anirn�r41111 II�.,� �:� unn=•�►'•-.�.:�+...y1 uuU 3:e'c= ! -':IIII�RfI is:n '-,:Inu•nm--@carol.:::-.-- r,nii_!.= lo- - rr •Iuuanrnrrr ::■Illy►���• 11111111111111111�::.'SI5!%__unrum�I Nn•I 11 OI■Ifr�-iulln �.Innnell IIIIIIIII In lnln.r�'����a uniiiii nii;uurr••• u11r■a::�_'s mm111. r unq urR!Reny,nl�allllll 1�- R{ll la�_- •''•rye \tW 1"11111-�Rn11111I1 r �� •IIIIIn 0 iilnrl cary�i,7 yj�■a- 1115«I:���•:�='.�(:_=1 ��.`�r Inu'�runluu- II►-pilrnr uu■• a1�C rlur... ills rllll did��•� a Ill�:•.,ia ar' R\. nrlu■\:Irrrr urn\a I III:�C "•�•R unn:uiiiR ^ n\ �y�{•.� \ �rfllr�w.w� % aun,A�� a1111 ►rA / -IIw--���-ii1:1:11:�:\`R„rRRrrrrn-�I•r �nrR �♦1-11,1• i �.irrin:�'-f�•wi�./ Inn,1►7f4r 11ln�if 1 �1111;�.--■IIIInIIr-pR,rnnrlll_- w% Ir1111f1 N�fr yam: /�u 11II11■-...•iiiii.:• u■I 11\�nun r - 1.1 -`Illlllln Ili .� ii r nli.-•► •Ilnunn.- uun n■W, Ili rJi ynnn mu'r rrrrm lur.n ' ' .:rrina�:e umnu ntk:uY..nuu'^lr_ nc I r„ R,:nnlnr■��_ IKnnnn ItnG_'I rr�������rnuurv, r__- - __ ai•nr.uu rrry Innurin�'•"��Ifm ilr6nw m Rn_ nr,nfllllrrr rr.., rQ:H::tll:l (► I111111�� ''gnu IAAA\-=ouuni' 0 3 _= r�.�ltlr - 411::.0 nnu lrnannra n,;:r,n . •�■!s nu�inulr:: � ;? _ �.:p uu;:rI 1 n mI I u..,11��1,n = /.,nnu.•k�m;inure■IfnAAu=1f11r,,I�r�rf== 1 ..� Gf u� Iu1f♦i 1 e 6 - ����m LIn■111... _ U"'��_�aS IIIIINIIIf�jlliirt I IINIII Illllllllllfl_`�� �r p �\IIl1� •4.��IIIniY%a\I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII„I,_� IIIIIIIIIIIIII== " Illfl� - • :IIIIIIIIlIlllrl . IIIIIIII„III IIIII,-I�:111111 1111111111 ',,,,' ♦•�11—II. - • - • rill-••,•, •r•r••nr �Iry���;�� 1111111111111 nn 1:ry.e 11 . I/1111►� "x�.`„=fi:C w „'I!Illl�r.;I IIH\IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIVy •CM ILLA.'N:.���rrl - — 11 IfnC:1114un� -.=uf: 1 nrl uunm�� �_`,:::.._ _ ■-I�SA1 7 1111 111 AllllllRl� "oil .'_+mow" '......... �• I t1111rr i4•,ummnlr N.�`'y�r li:=.'_2?==°'°'-'. ul,up li=•-i� , - 3__'�=Sun b -'un nJ�IP� Innn9pvri+�= ♦�rrn Ion rnl�Inx nxnuR. , �-=_ w � _,__ run::q� •i.• �•"- +f■tit► / �'unnu' e°=-•'s I -= �.ream �.,Ier1 .� ioom�•:: rrnr .Iuh ��.4n;nralnuuuuul uanl �urnu _..: rr ♦:.• - - rbn � l4rr+1•r•r IInIl1t11r:9n111111111111u� ■:1111111 �:=nun jil `1:% Aluf iQnf w =uu8� `R •u•rrn" 1 JJtlrrll - - ' 1'2ZIA1 ++rn:==unuunl:=r< n Inure is-= ImI:1��I�nurf �-:��Ir•I.in:i � �u i hl+hl=�:nruunu;=nrrY n`n I �ibrun xuillln n + ♦ '•+I. !r,can na► w , Ii.`�rfqurir���711Puuiu.gm •r�q.`7►�u�� r1 +�ii�i � u'Rll%f*u uqA ill•.../-n�nuii IN Is a �H _� ti /•�=III lrrll�L1 -i - can r�.Ir111112 WI. - • 1 - rui / • i - 1 Vq � - • - • � gip. Brl - r - r �►rIR"".♦i/iZj�•i::.� 0-4 ua aunp/f�. -i MININ Legend Project Location Area of it um iii �����I J W ••:�R��:����a�iii 4��r4:�?E e �_■ ■ � 5 /h..._@I�•.r,.• '-a ni _ CHI�NDEN � :.: anon RR 11 n ,nn_ :_ - rll,onu•nn::,., - ��Illll!;iii:Inllln�,4irINN•r illrllll' :'� �•r�. - ;;ii�:iii.a•••r�VS ImpactCity Lim L_ :Illlllln uun - .� �a,r �• •ri __ °�nx wn�h:� -�- iiiiiiiiR �=kl iii;;;:;::• ,iif;:rr ��: Planned • - rl�- „•nl__�,1 1�•••:�::1111!IIIIi::-r.a1�_ Ilfrrull�i•I,•!f+�i�vR1u1RA1■{ �n� ��11 fA • 1�rr .�� '-A FI!Ilnr��Ur�� :�.Ilr •If . Analysis i�HA-a11 :1111=:�1i•-r�Y_��ri:uu -�•In r+ SINE=_rnonm it O1l1 7 6uu ++ :: 111E► ■■:: _ II__= unity wKrmn AofI 1 In nunir� rRrR ni VI��N«I,� r�u�,qa��ryr•�a{1115«I:�• $«rvnlnu-pl Iuuu -lii�i__== ;� a..i�: i1nu�:l��nln.. (. ^ann\�•,;�•�a,.�d a\, �Nvun:-,r 11ln\��111■:�'li elI 4 =_' `.� ',/ -: r 11•ar1IIIYw-I '.uua:4=��±r, v r I�Llu nnu►Q.R.. t■ ._i v �'x_�iinri;ii iu:::nlr uu1��uu:::nurr{• nuulA � :::u�.�uou. i - ■■ '■ ► Iux••nrRrn LI�n n■rr.... �. � ,��-� �u■ � .:•unurrr•irk:::uinuu _^„tlC III:� Roan n �I�.r.l.][91n � ■ �::ullrrm�hRR11r nu.�ir.nRR �rronll uI iiini n,r, unm111A rr ��� /un1ul% L 1'::�n„y° --.1 mnulrl ER•.nnn u......mi i7; W rub Innn _m1.�our. 4 'a;7R�uumdi�u=In IAlllllr:^, r1Arr;.r'- ;;'r�-nmm•,I arl._nlaR.nl nln+In _ q `�_�„ •�• -::..$Ilnuuln\rI•« nlennl::u1n411 _'_ a r111HU•.Ilm Ilnlll!1 1 Ica; f I'er I►'�/IBI►� - . ulu yy■■'�� 1;;1 Lillll\�. 1 Y J MCM�IL-LAN - - - - nr. lrrrlr Itll rr � --- rllllllllllllh_-..•'a^j1�i��Arlimm ininn nnum uln-- n nrr Ilnrn 1 p�An+�i-. d n1u �_LA uinn "__`a= ��I+' - Air• �•w iiiii im1 uiinu°iii! =c===_''n I '-.I�u• { �.'+� �.,aa r rr rrr'I Zu I++rik 2. 1111pI =r u 4�,'rr �7E lil •I, �•+r71:iu::: Ii1Y,r1 f1+11+fu .. nlll Il11■;:-Ilrrbr•••In:c rr rr r -nnuuul-g nnr,mm�u=i'a. 'rvt_I_�' 'r '•+l+in.Ir.r .v, tiro i +�- - -_____ '• n �:i♦�i _ I/! dim;i •`a.� ♦ lr� r �--IIfF IiTO� ir;fr. �. nr� f4R■ram• 1 a +I bfi7pf/j.• •!�,�n-r Ei t71n11A11r a•y • � iit r � 'ip S.fUn■■■•1.��11■r1 f:' f4 �11 nu 61 q.rear■rR�l:. /■r• �. i12illjlrr r��i1111r11p�iiT •�1,,n mlrr wnu. CO ar, .i ._ I► r r ally aunty W �f+u i♦ N-:-• U 11 uul,>a'= ~ t Innlnl-1!1;��{IIrl1)��::::• �"„ _=rnllnl-nn= � y{:{Illun\ _�■Il/l _ "4 Trull__= .An urea*iiiii iu:iilll ■? f�i75- I -- ._ � algrl.�q hni�r♦I a 1 ntlnrinl111N� ��ir s,v-=ii'In-�_ .� � � YI•7\��r1{,���I f ' ' =rig"L'iii"II == ;:_ I nu=:_ nun� 4 • ri�;� I�I■��urrrr�r;==?=� �''-9'Jlnmmnur r�u� � ;}i�C.+::-i4py%y +e 6 I� ��_i��_ nnurr=== nrr-e - Ruruu+l+' 1 N• 9 ♦rrrrL-r- .�-=���I���I`_-. 2 -,�IIIIIIIII15c= 'n:':: ■OlI1nl1� / 4 r 117//-�C ���' . -_ ��-I—`�r��I{inoilnniulnTlrill:IC:l+ll„l,II '_' ImunRw_.�1�� I._r�lrrll l p t a, 7� C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S0427346800 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Scare: 25 16th Percentile Description Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft. fjcim pare, GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodclain or ac•es GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time 5-9 min. YELLOW Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals scme o tine ti--e YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 Df current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 112 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile drivinc: GREEN (existing or future) ParkWalkability No park within walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits D. Landscape Plan(date: 5/8/2025) I r Purr se—um raMae i...as I -,-ter a� � _ El � I — II — _______-_-___ J J l u'm I� � mnmru.. wmuww..0 orau•nm vr�m®meuwe� W a1 'a'�—�� ---'-` I\Vi�l ••mj ��BhruE Planlinp ®'®'® Y a �a _ M _ —ca I W MCMI1lAN POAx- � I e �'•� I! Lanl�deca ePlan-Landnna�e Plan Li.00 1' City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits E. Amenities Exhibit(date: 5/8/2025) I II I I I I I �w..nac�ada.nrlcn®�u c..n ��\Cmi.lmk F.M.ln�4pfia11 �cml.u�k rn<.rra�wuo. /1�.u.mn ca.� p_ M J E 0 =e \ r � I I _ . .....,o�.,..m.e.�.s�..�.®o.. 1 �emnanan caeme e.ninn •��.00.m....,�.,��,�.,��,mm�o....,a..�.,��.�.�,.�P� w...m. I a: �---------� C2.51 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits F. Preliminary Plat(date: 3/18/2022) wk --- r4.n.r�F�pi..er,lantlmq 4nYRent JIL W.i4 map: _ ------------ ------ II _ . I II II _____ __ cww rase OtIA Prelimina Plat-Overview •- � PP-01 \( i --------- �,` - I� /�l�•aa o..a-wN w,e.Ri m.N xewl „r s .. _ . 5 gj FE I' _________ iII I� Su e o F7 a - .. _ *�m it,qt,Preliminary Plat-Concept ImproremeMs Project Orerview` PP-02 1 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits G. Final Plat(date: 6/12/2025) Final Plat for Legend: Curve Table Line Table Piekleball Court Subdivision • u,xs�rxlAw,.ssxowx u,x,a•xEawx..smxwx Located in the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 4 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian, O mx m ro°x ,a City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho 2025 ---- SUM W.eRPNXE Sf. , 'U 8 V V1 A l a x I i rux mn M N o00 s 'P x I>gzx. �<P \ °P �,s _ XraXl nxxmxxx.s.:nxxn,n.x�.xx�xns Motes Iw,H � ���.�xC1s�x.�x®"xn"�xPExx° IIl\ scue:l•=SP I 1 $� ��"/ ``� \�� xesmrcxmnmew�e"w mrv�i°xxvw,nuEO"wnus way°�xcm 1 I 8 O I nxxf°.euconrvxwison norvmxnms.ss°w, inc.w,P�xs HnwxnE ffi t r / rmEn�ffxmaxao,mEx°imixxffx.x on.:sPmixcw.rwP�wwl,xa«xm1 1 I xo,Pn l �/ al xmxwm. ' zI II1 Ivy \ / O RI _ °,�wsux°mwar mis ra,sxw cwxxx rxruc.wuua�xmuanos xEnPcrnrnE,xc I I g I nEncxueuucamv®rvimxxwnmwxasass°cu,xx.wcce�xs. xwwrux°nr 'X 13 V / '� a. xswP,uxsx,mxwosar ssrnox slap, msovrt.OPs m¢mxnx°sumxxoxxssmowmAx _ I p� O I� iw l.` s I xaxmesTlmsixnunw mrxicrmxsvn'��I�"�rrm. we eaasxmrs o I � 8 I tmn I v ��xaOiO �I '„I � e$1B� xxaxmw j� �13 1 s ---_---_-- xw,wnnx xuxwm xnE xcwEawcw.x,wmn®xwr.vw«os,�cxmx,xc. �u �% 14 s I Igg sl�ulla'wesoMin@ .I Igo I' i z ffi� O Ogg x °m"i �siwm o`ne c® trw so oo 'ie,x ! I � Mn $nrYey ReRatire- 1 �$ $ xo,P,-1$ I xmiscx wwrm�rcun,wnuu,wuxaxwnxn.uxicxmwx rrvcwn°xsmxmxmmcu. zl — IS $ n ,�na I"__ ---`_. x.xoasnren�xmwn ixerorxe xrxo. nmax"'eca m. mfaF ES lsof3F l pPExRs'11p9 Y �Po ,,Ab'� �V IHw 1U ..... °suwemum µ°x°IE� �' Referenced Survey Table: m j '"'350"E,401' _7qY• ri O ni ttniPnff isloAixs,.xo. W�XRR CAMII R.A o/ axw inxsmn. am anon muxrc.ixww. xz m.�.maHOPn.,s.,P.rf„se wsrxo.e'xBm.uwws a. xo �•a PxH.s.e%� °n. j ---- _ _j I i PP�r �x�x� ml�xx APE ,mw�xrvm 7 wnrawwx 11P>�mmxttofm,Pouxn. � ,B Xlda1 I n.xixmrmrrccea mw.swxwiw non uxx.wv n._v.xN snm. i xmF,l� p xdxuxW IEIP'"�TAXlrmnrs swat e[... .w iz.ix°n[saxwsm[nxxs_ c xm mm ---------- J Io THE LI lJ Loan � LAND 6m xmzwvr nz.m � R xE ,mx P.•mPo 81 o- I MA _ .Ix.tMSLxMIo _M14x�'1 E.W6 �_Ni°mw 3rox PoNIWIE611N16 °�,3:a 1x Fwii4�0i¢ 6uim,ro C McnILLRX RD. __ (xx5180 E3RRIGI NE.r— —Ul City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits Final Plat for Pickleball Court Subdivision Certificate of Owners Certificate of Surveyor xoxrn wwuixesr.sous Msxiouxnon caum.m�u�a emu+�.ws�wn�iru�unsr�oraexsffnuwuowaw�Pa coos aaxrx�cmiursamsurwcvs. nxru xmm m a m usr..nsaes u a s�r rar xaxxe,sr uemvu a<ssa x�n: 0 7680 B r.fu ruc,xoxsua.n.ow.ry xmoxm. r.+m+ares nzsmmnsom.nmmom�xsmxvrorunurs aix ���,dP iwuunc ossw:o.seo-�so-,..ao�muw`ns`osu•ex�iv�rm,4n µo.�oao�sr�cu`�pasr wxru�mn roxrar cumc, sweep vamear pasrx�rossewuou.n.nu�a wo usreurwuna n:u xoxxsmrmuxemns ses.0 ssvnory rxs sovrxm�v ur xaxwmw ossoxiemaswcasrssn oxixswssrmcr AclmowtedgmeM sran or i sr<s xrcu..ss�as.vwrvs. LW axn ;s City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits Final Plat for Pickleball Court Subdivision Approval of Central District Health Certificate of County Surveyor Approval of Ada County Highway District Certificate at the County Treasurer �rvo��o�o�ry�x�ss�aow��,ox xa�E a�oa�o�x ti«..n�s�.�RaA��oti�s�A�o�R�E��ATMrem�°,��on�.TM Approval of City Engineer County Recorder's Certificate AT ias Approval of City Council —LEAK.,Ew—Ioa.o LARD ems° �zoa;asps City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits H. Conceptual Building Elevations ■ City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: City of Meridian Financial Report -July 2025 City of Meridian Monthly Financial Report FY2025 Jul-25 Table of Contents Report Name Page Number Investment Graphs 2 Fund Balance 3 artauau•i == rl `T T .� F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25 - 10 July Council Report 1 of 3 Monthly Financial Report ��.�' Y L E IDIAN 1- FY2025 Jul-25 City of Meridian Investment Portfolio Yield by Investment Type IDAHO STATE ,DOE 4.36% Jobk IDAHO BOND 3.84% FUND CASH 0.00% F I e 4.49% •FIB MoneyMarket$5,344,710 •Cash$38,498,476 MONEYMARKET •Idaho Bond Fund$78,994,814 •Idaho State Pool$96,666,527 City of Meridian Interest/Investment Income City of Meridian Cash/Investments Balance by Major Fund by Major Fund $4,000,000 $140,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $120,000,000 $2,500,000 $100,000,000 $2,000,000 $80,000,000 $1,500,000 $60,000,000 $1,000,000 $40,000,000 $500,000 $20,000,000 $0 General Enterprise $_ General Fund Enterprise Fund ■Total Budget ■Actual YTD ■FY25 ■FY24 F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25-10 July Council Report 2 of 3 Monthly Financial Report FY2025 E IDIAN*-- Jul-25 IDAHO 711/2025 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 C�� $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $ 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 ■Nanspendahle ■Restricted ■Committed ■Assigned ■Assigned Reserves ■Unassigned ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $- 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 ■Assigned ■Unassigned ■Assinged Reserves F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25-10 July Council Report 3 of 3 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 25-2533: A resolution adopting an Administrative Policy of the Meridian Police Department regarding approved server training programs C�/((IER IDIAN �AHO MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Emily Kane, Deputy City Attorney Meeting Date: August 26, 2025 Presenter: Lt.Jamie Leslie, Meridian Police Department Estimated Time: 0.5 minutes Topic: Resolution adopting an Administrative Policy of the Meridian Police Department regarding approved server training programs Recommended Council Action: Approve for Mayor's signature. Background: Meridian City Code section 3-7-3 requires waiters and bartenders who serve or sell alcohol to complete an alcohol server training and certification program approved by the Chief of Police within thirty days of employment. Meridian City Code section 3-7-2(B)states that the Chief of Police shall approve a server training program providing such training and certification upon a determination that the program educates and tests participants on nine enumerated topics: I. Consistently and accurately verifying patrons' proof of age and identification; 2. Recognizing false and altered identification documents; 3. Understanding the effects of alcohol on the human body; 4. Monitoring patrons' alcohol intake and/or behavior; 5. Recognizing intoxicated persons; 6. Methods of refusing to sell or serve alcohol to intoxicated persons; 7. Providing alternatives to alcoholic beverages; 8. Problem solving in dealing with intoxicated and/or belligerent patrons; and 9. All state and local laws and rules pertaining to the sale and service of alcoholic beverages. Pursuant to Meridian City Code section 3-7-2(A), City Council is to effectuate by resolution the Police Chief s approval of the alcohol server training programs meeting this criteria. MPD's list of approved server training programs was last updated in 2024,via City of Meridian Resolution no. 24-2490. Idaho State Police will now offer an alcohol server training. This resolution provides an updated list of approved server training programs, to include the ISP training. CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2533 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY OF THE MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT REGARDING APPROVED ALCOHOL SERVER TRAINING PROGRAMS; AUTHORIZING THE POLICE CHIEF TO CARRY OUT SUCH POLICY; SUPERSEDING PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED POLICIES REGARDING ALCOHOL SERVER TRAINING PROGRAMS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,Meridian City Code section 3-7-3 requires waiters and bartenders who serve or sell alcohol to complete an alcohol server training and certification program within thirty days of their employment; WHEREAS,Meridian City Code section 3-7-2(B) states that the Chief of Police shall approve an alcohol server training program for such training and certification upon a determination that such program educates participants and tests participants on nine enumerated topics; WHEREAS,the Chief of Police finds that the programs enumerated in the Administrative Policy attached hereto as Exhibit A meet the requirements of Meridian City Code section 3-7-2(B); and WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Council find that it is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Meridian to adopt and effectuate the Administrative Policy attached hereto as Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Administrative Policy attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby adopted and effectuated by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Meridian. Section 2. That the Chief of Police is authorized to carry out this Administrative Policy. Section 3. That all previous iterations and adoptions of administrative policies approving server training programs pursuant to Meridian City Code section 3-7-2 are hereby superseded, including, without limitation, City of Meridian Resolution nos. 11-830 and 24-2490. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this26th day of Aug., 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 26th day of Aug., 2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTING APPROVED ALCOHOL SERVER TRAINING PROGRAMS PAGE I EXHIBIT A �.�iL E IDIAN� Meridian Police Department ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY SUBJECT: APPROVED SERVER TRAINING PROGRAMS PURPOSE: To enumerate Approved Server Training Programs, the completion of which shall qualify a Server for certification pursuant to the requirements of Title 3, Chapter 7, Meridian City Code. POLICY: These server training programs are found by the Chief of Police to meet the requirements of Meridian City Code section 3-7-2(B) and are therefore deemed to be Approved Server Training Programs for the purposes of Title 3, Chapter 7, Meridian City Code: 1. TIPS (Training for Intervention Procedures) 360training.com, Inc., dba TIPS 6504 Bridge Point Parkway, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78730 800-438-8477 support@360training.com www.gettips.com 2. Learn2Serve Alcohol Seller and Server Certification 360training.com, Inc. 6504 Bridge Point Parkway, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78730 877-881-2235 support@360training.com www.360training.com 3. ServSafe Alcohol Responsible Alcohol Service Training program National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1500 Chicago, Illinois 60604-2702 (800) 765-2122 www.servsafe.com 4. Alcohol Beverage Seller/Server Training Idaho State Police,Alcohol Beverage Control Bureau 700 S. Stratford Dr. Suite 115 Meridian, ID 83642 208-884-7060 https:Hisp.idaho.gov/events/alcohol-beverage-control-seller-server-free-training/ RESOLUTION ADOPTING APPROVED SERVER TRAINING PROGRAMS PAGE 2 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Destination Downtown Discussion �E IDIAN� r,XjOl ,MERIDIAN jdevelopment core `��� REVIVE•RENEW•REDEFINE To: Meridian City Council Background Re: MDC Destination:Downtown-Design Standards Prior to the creation of the scope of work for Destination: Downtown, the design Dear Councilmembers, standard task was determined to be a key deliverable. At the request of the city, the final plan was to include the corresponding design standards.The standards were, and Included in this packet are the Old Town chapter of Destination: Downtown and the are, intended to develop a framework that ensures the look, feel, and use of down- appendix with the corresponding design standards. The standards are a key element town projects have a consistency,while maintaining a degree of creativity and flexibil- for helping fulfill the vision set forth in the plan. The standards only apply to the Old ity for property owners. The standards were also meant to prevent buildings and uses Town portion of downtown Meridian,with a greater focus on the Traditional City Core contradictory to the vision of downtown and to align with the plans and perspectives I and modest suggestions for the rail corridor and the Traditional City Core II. The of the city. standards are intended to guide elements, including: At the conclusion of the draft plan stage, the plan document, including the design -Building heights, -Off street parking considerations, standards, were submitted to staff for comments and reaction. Virtually every com- -Facade treatments/style, -Allowed land uses, -Building orientation, -Pedestrian treatments. ment, edit, or suggested revision were made and reflected in the draft submitted for -Public spaces, this work session. To summarize,the standards in the plan came at the request of the city, drafted to support the vision of the plan, and reviewed and edited after com- Important to note is that the plan is the vision and the standards are the instructions. ments were received from city staff. Without the standards, there is less certainty that development will take the shape of the vision and instead reflect a different vision, not shared by the many people, lead- LM& - 1 ers,and participants throughout the Destination:Downtown planning process. \ %s Desired Council Input There are actions needed by the Meridian City Council that will advance Destination: I ■ Downtown and codify the design standards. Given the city is the implementing agency for downtown development applications such as rezones, conditional uses, variances, and other actions, the design standards need to be supported and the zoning code updated to reflect the standards. Questions to consider: 1.Is the described land use vision for Old Town largely supported by Council? ' a. If so,do the standards as written implement the envisioned plans for Old Town? b.Are the standards as currently drafted appropriate for formal adoption into zon- Above:Illustrative rendering of railroad corridor included in Destination:Downtown ing code changes? 2.Is the land use vision for Old Town missing elements? a. If not,what minor adjustments does Council suggest? b.Are there suggested minor modifications to the design standards that should be made that do not significantly alter the vision for Old Town? "MERIDIAN E IDIAy development core ,'_� REVIVE•RENEW•REDEFINE`►:�`� The Vision The Old Town vision was crafted by numerous inputs including significant public com- Below:Excerpt neighborhood guidelines and Old Town Sectors map from ment, stakeholder interviews, regional and city plan and policy reviews, and down- Destination:Downtown of the Old Town subareas. town development approaches derived from national best practice. The vision starts with the railroad corridor and works outward to the downtown boundary edges in all Neighborhood Enhancement Priorities cardinal directions. Given the use and centrality of the railroad corridor, it is best suit- Redevelopment protect the existing neighborhood areas with policies that limit building heights and ensure ed for the highest and best use of space and density, particularly given its industrial consistency with existing setbacks. Adopt policies that allow For Accessory Dwelling Units and livelworkl[reate properties,as look and the desired recreational and commute pathways. Up to 8-story buildings well as small-scale neighborhood commercial uses. (100') should align the railroad parcels to frame the corridor and allow modern densi I{ Establish residentialpermitparkingwithrestrictionsonnon-residentialparking,as ties in the heart of town. The next band of space would step down in height and tran- indicatedinIheparkinganalysis. sition from the rail corridor both north and south. This allows slightly less, but still Upgrade intersections to include neighborhood traffic circles,starting with streets residents identify as problematic from a speed andcut-through traffic standpoint. modest densities while maintaining and respecting the existing context of Old Town. Upgrade crossings of Meridian Road to reduce barrier effect for neighborhoods to the west. The environment is envisioned to be high energy, full of captivating features that ap- Ensure existing neigh horhood needs are integrated into new parks and open space peal to people. The features range from enhanced lighting, unique placemaking con- Parks&Open Spac e.,j developedwithintheTCC1.T[C2.andRailroadCorridor.Determinewherepocketparks cepts, mixtures of appropriate downtown uses, and a landscape that promotes more may be appropriate on vacant or underutilized lots within existing nei glib orhoods. pedestrian activity either for downtown residents, or visitors, who can park once and - take in all that Old Town has to offer. In the established neighborhood enhancement areas, much of the neighborhoods are r r envisioned to be preserved, though allowed to grow through modest infill densities, Traditional �, t accessory dwelling units, and similar scale development. Otherwise, improving the y pedestrian environment, providing a sense of identity and pride through signage, po- Y. Enhan(ement tential mini-traffic circles, and landscape improvements, comprise the bulk of suggest- , ed improvements. For the Traditional City Core II, south of the railroad corridor, a continuation of the environment found in the TCC I is in the plan. This means up to 75 buildings of 4-5 . ; � stories, the promotion of Human Experience treatments (described within Destina- ��• ...,, � _ _,., � lion: Downtown), and improvements to the parking and pedestrian realms. There are t ,;� �• =j F,: ; ► major possibilities in the TTC II if larger property owners decide to relocate or sell their '` t parcels. For the downtown to truly begin towards the 1-84 exits, a steady march of --�—�- true downtown like development projects should follow. This plan and the corre- �J� � � + �' 1' '�0 J sponding design standards intent to do just that, and be a modern extension of Old Town and its many appealing locations and features. Old Town t}Id Town WridianShauldcmcea in serve as Overall Old Town Priorities the heartbeat of the eity.To do so.it must con kimie to cecrlsr into a sit►•cxrrc that retll_�cts that of a cite voof lve i than l4{corctl i ha r etc " r r Respect Meridian's history while promoting a modern downtown.Continue to increase the number of businesses and residential uniT%in Otd Towp,Maximize opportunities that cotne While what with mitigation orthe Nine Mile Floodplai& tru]t ctzrYuiil�u u ii}Icc"�+"ti,forl>urlx0KN41f A"npliry downtown's role asa go-to rather than a go-through desditation with mix of tllis 1)LIo iI is dcGncd as Fri nkiin Roxid I commercial and event-based uses.Update policies to promote vertical development with C'anlli m Avvtwu.including most of the hind appropriate downtown architecture themes. IYOwcunSouthw", nthStrutti;'[�+t<�f lericlian Ilona to Northeast:,th Street tothe east of Ndain r " Create a pedestrian-rich environment through street improvements,building design,speed Street, nianagement,and improved access.Manage parking by increasing utilisation through scaled enforcement,then investments in parking racilitiei. This planning alga is divided into four Yone~for this plan(mat)on next page): Seek opportunities to expand public parks and open space throutghc Pocket parks within Traditionall City Core 1,ninth of the larger downtown development,development of the rail corridor as a green We,with a raiIroad track-*fo)m NIcridian Itoart I East pathway and transit-ready land uses. :ircl Street. Traditional City gore Z snuth orthe r:ail:,qmd tracks to from l/4-miletieestof njr� *• r. 1 icricii;ur flt�:td tcl East 3rcl Street. j � #1 # �r Ila!Iroad Corridor,cons ist i ng of thestrip of proix:rtics adjaLviit to the north and south ■■ Ac of[lie Iracks front 1/4-milewvst of r ^i NtcricliniiIti"acllc" furlhewa 16tliSlrc•cI- NoighIM"rhood Enhanc:eirwnt.inclucl1jig ngightx)ncoixis nomii of Brtin(W-n4 Avenue, test of3leridian I1iind wid east of East 3rd St Met. _yam`y f Destination:Downtown Meridian 23 Meridian's Heartbeat L Old Town 6b,.- U _1 OwralI.the Four zones within Old Town are grourd floors of future buildint,N need to With reprds tothe building uscni above the envisioned to include a varict)•of dovviitown- capl'n ate the public,be)vcicoming and inviting, lied f1mr.Ivtiidential,tirufewtii;anal office or orlenteIlk%L'.ti,'I'I11ti111Cansil{I['t14C,1111kCYll1#{' i111S'g0&ea0e171r*t0 Indi 'tduil office suiles,education[lrextension l:lilSl imitem.Iolms#t l3{'demrian envirS?i1i1 ent. cvqomem and do►+'nti)1Yn mNidCi1Is. %emicesp aml slimilart)pesormesare :llsRl:��tl nllt;niixkure[ll'I�++irtictltial l3llitr+. preferred.SLIC11 uscc gig-e(IONVnlotii-n:<Ometlling c�1llltmmialcntc rises,offixs ttin ancl `I'liil:ealfbeachievedbyineltldiiX [�iff['I['t1tL1528 ' rp �+�. • it hfl:sn't liaciccrosistctltl) fi�rf;encl.ltialls a ltltirrhl lla{Y•s iti ith rear-rtuuld n 1 x ll. that offer more commereial enlerprk-es,or fi I:I 11 sEl;nificaintcuatonlcrha-x.Wliilclvcvnt)cat-, ttrmugll design feat ureF tikC c x p:sn si�'e u•i ndou•s While theTraditinnal City Core 2 area is not Fend higlll}'captitinkinternal d{�i}�11 fiatlxlvs have increases in d4'3igiiat(6,€I ltl ll&qt cil)':IIMt Ml)C pIdlnnil5g 1%picalofdowntoivn.What rannot occur are [•IIm4mierappeal,bri%1Il;Ittot`L'Ix,'oplc illto efforts.the street grid and charae•leristicsof spa{eskxill�likt]e to noaplxaltSip:eti�c.rib}', verlicaispacescilltcr(hiringwork hours oras IhcscI)roj erties.h(All CLIrrCI1tIV:tllil in Iikely *IIICces f1 lh little ntli4' a liwa ltop .&se ICby, r idenis.will dranuiti{:}l]t'illcreas:eIlie rcd[Y+c'lupititi[rnt,s;u;i c'xl it Irlx rtruti) YIfthiIity of bu.inem pul�uits on thegnnind s'1C'lYkSkkkl:ullti,l-['.kl[-.tal{',:uiil iii�klr;kl�cc• 11txor�:lnd transiale illtoeven moresticec'ss s:inlilwritit^s tot I1�•lxauiularirti['Iyt�(ainc[I iIl 'Craditional C'ih-Care 1. ■ x .--.—� +4�• l �,y Th is col lection of developmen t types, comil)ined with improti•ingexiKting street conditions in the Neighborhood E;nhanc.-ment areas;,call help malim the Traditional isian F{se t.h:lt is lar#;cly'thc eit)' tkrit;inal IV Core I t{s�ti'11 xite. 1 II kh Lard Use&design Strategies t ('[rncel�tuall}-.thc'E'rlditi��lr[I(:il)Ctkrc 1 i�r'?. I��� w;%%vll*,the railriyadcxerridnrshould grow ill Melf witll more[tense land use p;itterns,Incrvas i y �' ,.. buildinglicioNshould he promolcNi along Ilex k ' raiIrmid eigridor witll building around the ° IdahoAvemw blocks ofOld'rownreflecling ; tile traditional two-stern-scale of t he streel. '' #'s . . (;Ilaundfltx�r€slndthcbal�IncrnFthrbuildin�gs �` 3 .,..M should Elc viewed as tivo separate q-Aims.`nic +� � ��. .. � •' t ,x VA tUly �. i y ~` -W. iowntown Meridian 24 Meridians HeartbeatOld Town when the city or Chamber of Commerce put on within Traditional City Core I are properties Caldwell and Boise are more alike.Meridian F€sti►als,events,or related gatherings• where the I leritage School sits,along with the and Nampa share a characteristics of major Beyond the lWildi ngsenicand uses,spaces in blocks confined by Pine and Broadway, arterials bifurcating their downtown,whereas downtown must appeal to people on Foot.Cafe between Last 2nd and Eatst 3rd Streets. lanise and Caldwell have in dorarterials that street side dining,sitting areas,shade,lighting, Properties►►•ithin'Traditional City Core 2 are are more offset from the hulk of downtown music,and more,are precisely what downtown located primarily within the Nitic Mile properties. needs more of to attract people. Floodplain.Industrial Properties are also kc�• Such conditions am,not insurmountable for Old'Town is com[7cti nt, f►w•i tl7 other places, to realizing reile►'elU]]ment goals for this area. Meridian.but make developing pedestrian-rich including The Village,never planned Mobility&Access environments more chalkirginggivcn an development spaces,and otherdo w'ntowns.For Perhaps Iht.niost signifcannl conflict in uncomfortable environment like a major road Old'ro►an to succeed,it simply must offer realizing a inure pedestrian Friendly dotiw'nivivii to walk or bikealong,or cross. similar featurt-s and likely even mare. is the Current orientation of Meridian[toad and ']'lie barrier cfftctofthese arterials is real but Fortunately.sonic buildingcicmcaits arc Main Street arterials,A quick comparison of there are ways to improve them while achieved through private endeavors assuming; other large cities with s[milararterial maintaining the desired traffic flrnw^,s.Oil the code pernii Is,others may require public Configuration in the Treasure 1'alleyshows that transportation side this includes placinga investment oFnttxlcst levels,and Fora select Meridian is more similar to Nampa,while greatersafety eniphasison east/westcrossings Few,more significant investments should be made but can be done so through private-public pailnerships. �' .. it.... c ! r't �h:,.!`• , Catalyst Properties ;:, : . • .; � t I'hc large parcels developed within the Old 1'R�wvn area dairing the pastdecade are part of :� ■- !1 :.� .'1 what prontplt•d[lie Destination:Downtown "` � � �•-:. �~ '�� � i�_'� '���1. : Update.With the lots where City]gall,Old ; Town Lofts,and the Union 9:3 are complete or underconstruction,the next se[of catalyst '^-W�'`. ` properties are situated primarilt•►►•itlwin the Rai lroad Corridor,cast Gr3rdStreet<indSouth of the railroad tracks. IL 4` t � .r:,.�• : 1 _ � ��. :1,.;��� Ilk �� Meridian's Heartbeat L Old Town of the Main/Meridian arterials and reducing festival street along East 2nd Street,Festival vehicle travel speeds using the fallowing Streets are unique in desi�m and serve techniques: residents,visitors,and patrons of events,with • Revised traffic signal cant rol pla 118; motorists treated as guests to the street.The • 1leduccd travel lane widths; section from Broadway to]line is already • Raised intersections tic crosswalks; planned For this trentment.A second phase is • Curb extensions; recommended north of Pine to Carlton given • Refuge islands&-landscaped medians; this section serves no real function in the motor • Pedestrian scrambles;and vehicle networks. • ltoundabouts or traffic circles. Elements ofa Festival street include: .kCl ID identified potential treatments to . Pedestrian movemrntnt all points; a improve conditions For bicyclists and . Flexible design for temporary closures; _ pedestrians in the downtown area.The . Street furniture,trees&planter boxes; _ } Playbook section For the Destination; . Public art t-performance areas; and - Downtown Updatcpmvides even more focused Overhead&streetsidc lighting. improvements to build on ACHF7's Findings- Perk Ldne in Kirkland,WA,1pictured above and below)has many 11 sample design that is similar to Meridian's features that are worth considering in the design of20 Street as Many of the downtown streets,cast of context is Park 1—me in Kirkland,1.L'A,I t is two a Festival Street.It is recommended that such a treatment be Meridian Road,are tailor-made for various blocks in length with image~bel(m,and at right. applied from Broadway Avenue to Carlton Avenue. improvements while Meridian Road is a major ` •. : }� ,; ��`. barrier.'1'his-ba rr ier e ffect could be rcdticed by° adding landscaped medians in pockets where ���,�;. �_ �:•.,:;� _. there are Few or no turni ng cont]lets or where _ ACI4D desires locontroi access to and/or From 4 side streets.At this time there are no plans to _ reconstruct Meridian finad to include n shared - use pathway between Franklin and Cherry,but thatmavbeafutureoptioniflarge-scale redevelopment occurs along the route. A transportation-and economic-related strategy for Old Town is the creation of a Meridian's Heartbeat Old Town Polio Changes & Investments to Consider gN 3. 1 2 I 1 1 ► *, + Maximum buildirigheight or7:5'or 5 stclrics. - Traditional- Neighborhood Railroad Corridor + AIlowone-timeexpansionofexisting prs)pertyftrrnun-c(inf4)rniing;,tructures, Neighborhood . Maxiinum buiIdinnheigliIofltlll'or8 + Prohibit 40-street suriuce parkingon stro t "• Enhancement Fmntagc(notalley;s)- • Fntiure oricntation wward railmacl + Red tic'eorclin)iitatcoff-street parking corridor in anticipation of future rail-with- recluirt,ments forexistingbuildings and Railroadtrail and transit usm c0111-iicicr reduced rcquir nientti for off- Corridor . Nrtiue addition of iv dcstrian and bicyclist street park"na;for commercial uses-when }� _ �k* inulerl tssnrc7t'crpasawestr)Fialeridi.ln lx4rt(if n,ixccl-ils residential. r� $ Ifoad. ;U:r fat + 1nvest in Human l,xpericn(v Features f."� � �� :� �„�.� �F-il: .;,,,. • Allo t'lil�;t flcx�r residrntial unlessadjacrni Withuti pubic right-of-way and encourage - ; "�` „ ;"" to planned station kxatioa and stm ts. tlieir incY"rlxarntion into private civic , 'paces. tTraditional Upgradestre th to have p destrian- Frkcnd!} tcatures„such as curbextunsions. 'r raisccl crossinp,and strc�ct trees. �" � � �� - L_ 7Neighborhood + 1)rr [rveexisting residential uses, + Upgrade titructs with SicicwcilkcYrnncctionti and + Upd ate puliciestopromotcAc(%-ssoryDivelIing ncilihurhl)cfdtrffiecircles. [?nits it)allow residents to keep their property + Create Ivsidenti.il l)arkiiigzones t+"liix)liibit viable fnrcontinucd skngkc-Family housing. unwanted encroachinent cirdt)vnttowi,parking Meridian's Heartbeat Old 3 blih- 7� N Traditional City Core 1 &2 Realizing this plans stated goal for incremental Traditional City Core Priorities steps to growth in downtown starts wi th the two — Traditional City Core areas.'rhis means Redevelopment Consider zoning code changes to ensure development fits the vision for downtown,while consideri ng policy changes that allow for: allowing market-based proposals to-succeed.This includes things like pre-approved • Building heights to complement existing development plans for multi-story residential properties,ensuring downtown development historic buildings,thus reducing height policies allow for efficient review and approval,and parking policies that optimize existing maximums contained in the existing Old spaces. Town 7.oningdistrict. Plan Fora pedestrian and bicyclist railroad underpassjoverpass to the west of Meridian sk Design standards that arc modern and Transportation --A Road(highest priority)and to the east of East 3rd Street(lower priority),Identifying the unique,vet honor the area's history;and location will help preserve the access as the area redevelops. • Growingthcr footprint ofmixed-use Accommodate wayfinding and bicycle-related infrastructure when the rail�svith-trail option properties while)ring flexible to aflow it to is feasible.This includes connections to the pathway From adjacent streets and secured work Enaticially For developers. bicycle storage within multi-story residential developments in lieu of on-street hike racks. ltealizing this Vision regLdreS the city to consider the finals for drnvntn►vn a ithin an update to its i 1 View the railroad corridor as an opportunity to create a linear green space that helps buffer the tracks andenhances the frontage slang adjacent development. comprehensive plan,and then aligningthesc plans with an ulxJate to city ordinances.A buildinglieight maximum oF75'(or5 stories)is reconvtrcnded. r l'rovidi ng prc,dietabil ity to developers is crucial as they must adjust tochangcs in financial and R ' consumer markets,development costs,and other 4 factors out oftheircontrol.Some strategies the cihr may consider to provide predictability ' -own _ include: Pre-approved Building Plans For Ilousing: SUCh tfl:uiti can include a varietyrof housing 1 t}pcti�md for various lot sines indicative of tho,e in TCC t and 2.Pre-approved designs ' Meridians Heartbeat Old Town reduce the subjectivity in the development . [larking Policies:A key inLentive is . Improve the I Iuman Experience:'I'lic process and providedcvelopers,residents, minimum requirements for on-site thial strategy'to implement should be taken and businesses certainties on the type, parking.'1'he result of the parki ng ana[yNis by the city,MDC,and groups like the appearance,antl function of housing undertaken for this plan made it clear that, ChaniherofConmperce.Namely,fOCLIS Oil • Ensure Efficient Review&Approval is even during weekday and weekend peak the creation of highly unique,safe,fun,and Maintained:Continually revieNi'tile periods,downtown has a Significant amount of interesting downtown.Bt'pursuing the policies and procedures for dow'nta4vn :available surface parking.If on-street and off- recommendations made in the l luman development review and approval to street parking managed using the strategies in FxperiencecImpter,as well as the ensure these timelines are similarto the parking study,the relatively low stress placetnakingconcepts in the "Lighter, developments in other areas of thecity. parking environment can be maintained and QUicl;cr,Cheaper."plan developed for improved w'ithoitt substantial investments in Wwnlowti so {'rail'year ago,Meridian This may include recognizing the utility parking infrastructure. ►vauldfinditselfinaclassof its o�tn. and cost savin=;s from a proposal for n order for a developer to meet the demands Del ivering to residents,workers,property emerging practices such as ninchtlar nxtlti ofon-site parkin uirentents,the!eith story resiclen#ial units,inelktclin}; parking roc i they either owners,and the development community need todedicate limited surhee acreage or an environment bounteous in sensations understandi ng that theston•height for a modular unit is generally 12 fret compared construct parking thrnUgli vertical integration and cmo>tinnal stimulations u•il]bring via pedestal park inggarages.In either case, buzz unlike other cities.The public to 10 feet far Iraditional,site-built such land or construction can be very' construction.'I'hc purposeOfsuch an inwe� #meals madewill create a downtown expensive and even prohibitive,while where the development world will be forced action is to get as many customers living in depicting the economic return on that down town ascµtickly as pnssil}lc to help I fi � to take notice and continue to seek ways to property in termsofreduced property taxes• be part ofsornethingspecial. usherincommercial invcstawnt. Inccntivize Adaptive house of Buildings &[larking:A third stratekty is ince:ntivcs that can help developers overcome challenges not faced bygreenfield developtnent:0Ider utilities,ensilring older buildings meet modern ADD,fire and bUilding codes.and lltnitedopportunities � f �, * M. r •, i for on-siteparking. ' { If Downto dii—n , t t t 'Counterparts at The Village,then ens4ring downtown has similar features is important.These include:Limited parking in tho core,lighting and other peopleregular events that give t i (ome downtown. Meridian's Heartbeat L 0Id Town Railroad Corridor The Union Pacific rail corridor presents a Railroad Corridor Priorities significant npporl a nity for downtown to improve the return on its value and address Redevelopment Consider modifying coning to promote development that is ready for future utilisation of sonic of the city's and region's housing and job the railroad corridor to include a shared use pathway and potential public transit. needs.At this time,do,clopinent along the rail Mitigating the floodplain issues west of Meridian Road will also allow for redevelopment of corridor is largely older industrial uses. those properties. As that land become, more valuable,the Transportationplan for a pedestrian and bicyclist railroad underpass or underpass west of Meridian Road. likelihood it is subject to redevelopment Identifying the location will help preserve the access as the area redevelops and provided increases and the cite and'4 DC are advised to needed connectivity west of downtown. ensure policies arc ready to respond to this. Accommodate pathway related infrastructure when the rail-with-trail option is feasible. The rail corridorand the parcels along it can be This includes connections to the pathway from adjacent streets and secured bicycle storage prepared for Ix)tential shifts in use as markets within multi-story residential developments in lieu of on-street hike racks. change,and commercial and residential Parks fpen Space View the railroad corridor as an opportunity to create a linear green space that helps activity increases with it. Given it is already buffer the tracks and enhances the Frontage along adjacent development. buffered From the Traditional CsityCore 1 due to City 1 hall and the planned Union 93 block, —this me cos the corridor can absorb building heights as currently zoned for in the OldAr ronin ]t}t}'hci htor135tories . ,' ~ g district( g ) off- Much discussion has been had regarding the �101111,1 � potential fora regional passenger rail system and the city's pursuits oF.t rail-with-trail vs � pathway.Both possibilities would drastically -_-� alter the landscape,land use demand.activity, .undl m —niiltcns�ironcntalongthcrorridor. � ""� -=+=k' f A l:ven without major movement on those Fronts, the city and MDC can provide n transit-,and trail-ready corridor that will addresgothcr ` Meridian's Heartbeat L Old Town ' necds in the meantime.In recent years,the transit or by hike are also accommodating of stories or 35'and a recommended maxinnnn I1nmediate 1'li'Init►y has L'Al1L'L'IL'I1Ceil SLICII these modes. of eight stories or lilt %although higher changes with City Ilall and the Keller& The key to the realization of thcsc concepts For buildings maybe allowed. .Associates building Mitigation of the Nine I41fle Creek flclodlslain ks°i]l bring mare potential the rail corridor is to stimulate the high 7ntliilg implicatinlls around transit-ready MileCreekdevelopment to the area. likelihood of remediation and mitigation from development will require increasesof building longterm industrial use.Such costs could be height,reductions for off-street parking, Land Use&Design Strategies barriers to construction in combination with increased bicycle parking and saFc storage, Conceptual ly,'l'i ansit Oriented Development conventional costs For demolition,nlatertal and more.Similar ehanges may be in order is about Franlingthe corridor itseWand removal and disposal,and thedevelopnlent should the trail materialize,particularly For intensifj'ing the land uses to coincide with itself.Additionally,the complications and bicycling. transit services.Given current challenges with associated costs will likely mean any desires Mobility&Access transit funding;,creating transit-and trail- around below market rate housing or ready development is a more practical way to commercial rents,are non-starters.This is why I hC]I'ailsi]url{ulicm i1Ctw[}rli in#IIevlCllllf}+of lartnersbi s and a regiments betwveen the ci the rail corridor is largely alreadyconstrlicted ti iew the area. 1 P g city and/or MDC and property owners,as ncll as or planned.The rail corridor be Permitting;redevelopment structures to V R'f,a re key. subject to significant planning;and design, consume most of the acreage in i mined iatc rail should passenger rail service and/or a rail- corridor parcels,allowing taller,trcicttzrc,than Further,rail corridor development should with-trail pathway realized. elsewhere in Old Town,oricntinggrnund fluor i lie]Lid edesigpl materials and treatments that millimizc the effgicts of and vibration but Providing additional railroad crossings for operations towards thecorridor where possible, nlotorvehicles is cost prohibitive,but areas and overseeing appropriate residential embrace the thematic elements of the rail line_ Buildin xhei hts should be a minimum of three wcstoFMcridian Road and cast of Fast 3rd development,will create a transit and mil- #� g ready hub. Furthermore,[lie rail corridor can be viewed as a people-inc]�•Ing lllg;llNVay.Wiletller the J passenger rail or rail-with-trail emerge first,the ♦,y corridor has the potential to be a conduit for 1 bringing}people to downtown on a daily basis ' 'y - ,F• p��[��til for work,experiences,and services. Should this scenario unfold,it places residents. Il workers,and visitors within what's calleda I✓Q�������� � one "first mile,last mile"situation where the beg.inning;and end points of a trip made by Meridian's Heartbeat L Old o —� Street would benefit From an additional Cost sharing may got complicated,but could be located.Once Formalized by the city,this pathway crossing.If the railroad remains in largely he split between the provides the rational nexus to require an Union Paepficownership,then underpasses or developer,city,and MDC. casement or otheraccommodations For under overpasses should he considered.If VRT or overpasses if development is located in the someday receives ownership of the corridor. d[�It1411dI Features location identified through the Study, then at-grade crossings may be more Should passenger rail service result from the attai nable and could be used for emergency many conversations between UP and regional Parking for transit access can be negotiated for scn7iceaccess in addition to pathway decision makers,additional enhancements and any private parking structures built to serve the connection. treatments will be needed. tenants of redevelopment or may he secured 'rhe treatments will require several agencies through existing city-managed lots adjacent to If at-grade crossings do not material i ze, the ra i 1 line. downtown partners should consider the other than the city-and MDC.These include the challenges associate with either an tinderpass railroad company itself,VRT,COMPASS,and Other supportive land uses in nearby mixed oro%c•rpass such a high water table area, potentiallyACHU• use development should be encourage to serve height and span of an overpass.,and all While Funding for transit sermvices and stations fixture transit patrons and nearby residents. associated costs.Though the crossings are not may be pursued by Vlt`1'and C(?M1'ASS, the These include day care Facilities.drycleaners,small convenience stores or bodegas,and feasible nor needed at this time,as city and MDC can ensure that development in grocers.redevelopment occurs major use conversions the railroad corridor not conse tsc ��nd happen,[lie underpasses or overpasses will intended for a future stations and bus transfer become more of a need. points. Should either connection be build,people can It is recommended that the city,MDC,and VRT move From one side of the tracks to the other engage in a planning Process to identify the in a more direct line of travel and without the many support elements oFa train station safety concerns of an at-grade cromi ng. platform and bus transfer point to best Key to note 1s that city of Meridian tivould not determine where pedestrian e01117CetionS should likely be able to require development to pay _ z for the total costs as they connect L%vo separate properties.It therefor~will be essential to work with developers-to ensure a public easement is maintained for the tunnels or - IR PIN.M - . • Mt rig itiy'orN sy '777 l?refcrrcd L'ooalinnf `-?. , AT L< PIP— Meridian's Heartbeat L Old Town Neighborhood Enhancement Areas Allnwving greater density withinthc,'1'CCI,TCC Neighborhood Enhancement Priorities 2,and Railroad Corridorcan reduce the pressure for existing single and multi-Family Redevelopment protect the existing neighborhood areas with policies that limit building heights and ensure residential properties to redevelop.This will Consistency with existing setbacks. help achieve the goal for preservi ng the Adopt policies that allow for Accessory Dwelling Units and livelworkf create properties,as character of Meridian`soldest neighborhoods. well as small-scale neighborhood commercial uses, • Character Preservation.A key component 11ransporttition Establish residential permit parking with restrictions on non-residential parking,as of achieving the goals far the Incremental indicated in the parking analysis. Growth seenario i4cLcincentrating Upgrade intersections to include neighborhood traffic circles,starting with streets development on large,catalyst parcels residents identify as problematic from a speed and cut-through traffic standpoint. within 4P)}Cboundaric�.]3y doing so,more intense development on these properties Upgrade crossings of Meridian Road to reduce barrier effect for neighborhoods to the west. can help reducedevelopment pressure in Ensure existing neighborhood needs are integrated into new parks and open space neighborhoods cast and west uf'i'CC 1. developed within the T(C 1,TCC 2.and Railroad Corridor.Determine where pocket parks 'rhis can heachieved by holstering land u,e may he appropriate on vacant or underutilized lots within existing neighborhoods. policies to al law low density reuse of prolx,rtit-s forsingle f uni]t•homes and -Mumma— neiglihorhood commercial establishments. Setbacksshouldbc maintained and policies eased to allow For act-essorydwvelling units, prnriding the main housing unit Oil the rite r is owner-accupiecl. • Parking Protection.Concerns about the — t' spillover ofon-street parking from`1'CC l were identified in the parking analysis. Hecn�nmendations to help mitigate this _- _' N concern is the establishment of a residential f' parking program that sets time-of day and/ soil+Y i +* 4.� Meridian's Heartbeat L Old Town6b..- \-=-1) or day-of-week restrictions.These must he Parks&Open space.,These neighborhoods enforced in order to male tliem effective are void of public parks and open space.The and generate re)e nue to support city and M DC should consider establishing a enforcement and the permit program,as neiglhborhood park west of Meridian Road noted in the park!ng analysis and east of East 3rd Street to serve these Traffic Circles.Another translxwtation areas,Such parks maybe located along the + stratc +to take in the\eigltUorhrxxi railroad tracks or on small parcels obtained ; b�nhnacment area i,installing via strategic purchasingof properties as they go on the market or identifying publicly- neighborhood traffic circles,Installing ' trafliccirclesin theestablished owned remnant parcels. neighborhoods both east and west of the human.Experience.Residents ofthese couplet would acid identity,a uniqueness, areas should be rm)gniacd for their and demonstrated 4afcly elentents.Further, contribution to the downtown environment, if rnodcst ptihlic art features can be instal led as well as some of the sacrifices they make in inside the traffic circles,both areas would living so close to downtown.Closi ng blocks m:uad out among Meridian neighborhoods or mu]tilalestreets for a neighborhood street Neighborhood traffic circles are used in many Intermountain and be provided an oplxn-tunity unlike Fair tarother event can honor that West citim,including Salt Lake City(above and below),as well anrvhere else in Ada County. contrihu lion and provide temporary often as Lewiston,Bozeman,and Missoula.Applying these treat- spacc as niore permanent solutions are ments in neighborhoods adjacent to the Old Town Care will The stratcp5!will netA participation from pursued. help alleviate traffic concerns as downtown grows. AC:IID and may need to he funded outside _ ACI lD sources given the treatments are _. largely for local streets and not subject to impact fees.Nevertheless,using traffic F 'il circles rather than 2 oi•4-waystop inter,wchons has many benefits and can - f greatly enhance downtown Meridian.The images at right showata example of such �* traffic circles in neighborhoods in Sall I akc City. Appendix Appendix A: Code Changes for Consideration transportation and land use patterns,a new considerations toa new I y esLabli shed TCC The below-changes to consideraddress identi- ffi'erlar�nr underlying"TCC District"govern- district or overlay zone.In some cases, fled opportunities in the design process,ttse ing permit review prrxedures,architectural howetirer,recommended standards may be allowances,and design requirements/ design standards,uses,heightand off-street considered for broader app]ication within the guidelines. Included are sample code parking requirements is recommended. existing0ld Town%,thing District.'I'hc fol- provisions that may be added oramcnded.is lowing is a summuryofret-c�tnmended changes The table below and on the Following page deemed appropriate by the city of Meridian. and sample code provisions to]-Consideration provides an analysis oft lie existing code Based on the uniqur.historical charac-teri sties provisionscurrently appiicable to the specific to the proposed TCC district or ofthe Traditional City Core rM,input oterlay- {� l traditional tore and offers proposed changes or received during this process,and existing Site/Building Element Existing Standard Changes to Consider . Intent General and Minimum r off-street Building Orientation Minimurn ol'30%-40%of lot X1inimum or;(1%orlot(other than single Family residential)developed as it hln ding or pedestrian-oriented publicly-accessible . Preservu Old Town developed as a building or public spaccat strcct frontage. context. space at street frontage. + Pedestrian-oriented streets. Off-Street Parking& Oft Street Parking RLquired Although forconunercial uses,thestandard is less than for other districts,off-street minimum parking Orientation (1 IWO SF for non-residential M'(lui3•eme116;may sti ll he a significant financial rind sixttial barrier where a use change for an existing building is proposed or within 0-11. 1-2 per unit ror where abusinctiscxpansioni%proposed. + Reuse of existing mixed use(no reduction for buildings. The long-term tradc`rrfl'may dimini%17 vil�ran���,walkahility,gaps in the traditional/historic pattern in thut�rsre,r4Y1u4'CY1 s)utd(x)r t• p i provided) din ingareas/other civic spaces,and[lie taxbase. Surface parking lot abundance tend to decrease the feasibilityor ruturestruc- . Market-based code. provided) turret parking facilities due toxupply/demand. . Pedestrian-oriented Forsitesover2 aerc%,(Mofoff Wicrtoff-strc-ct parking is prop)sed,prohibit It]xht°ccn a huilding and the rrnnta}acstreet(not allr.k}in thc'i'('C'1 and TCC 2, -street parking tray be behveen strctts• building and street. Forthosu Wbereer•istingoI-street parkin};borYlers a sht rL require landscal)(xi szereenin-s or decorative Ferwing.Bari]}•ingthat chain link less~,small off-street lots(with a or-0nyl 11encingdtre%not inect(he standard. single drivraisle)art allo ed. Consider substantially reducing orclirninatirig off-stmet parking requircmunts fir curtain cYtmmertial uscs within the tradition- Within traditional neighborhood al core,such: district.5,parkingshallprimarily + l nr€ivinkihcfirstl(l.{7[105rnrltasal�lctip;ice tiircnmmurcialutics. he bchitid err to thesideofbttild- + Itemoving the requirtrnent in threxi%ling parkingctxie lhal requires additional parkiiigf<rra chanf;eorusc inprs,Rclicrvakv provided with (to encon rage repurlx)ei rig of exist!ngbuiIdirigs) %cruer]iilg + Reduce minimum ruquircntuots firrmulti-f:unily°housing to l spac-e pertrni[with tiogut%t parkiiigreeluireinuntx. Code Changes for Consideration, continued siteJBuiltling Element Existing Standard [hanger to Consider • Intent General and Minimum II ' + ' I parking. Lcontinued Alternative Compliance 111anning Director mayauthori7e ktcplacc"altcrnativccu�ml>liancc"u iYh adrnini+trativcdc.it;ii departure For not noire th:,ij l()4-r oi'a numerical[llineilSiun:,l 011-5B-5} alternative compliance hased oil staiularLltocliminatesuhjectivecritcrinlorcitystalftointerprct. liicorlxfrateie+ic•npropurdure bu orld101,iLliinensictin.i] prcm,dent,feasibility,judgment st.Lnd.Lrds hs ,�rc+°it�+�'hncl+'with criteria liar�ipproval cKxiifictl free hclnw t;lblr), • Streamlines process. that alternative is equal or better, • lmprovespredictability. and is not detrimental. Allowed uses Allowed by CUP: Permit drinking estahlislinientsnutright in'CC:C:1 to reduce timing,uncertainty,and cost for applicants.Permit drinking estab- (TABLE 11-2D-2) Drinking stahlishments lf.hmtnts on first ftoor,Ofhuilding;z fronting stmets in non-residential areasoFTC'C;2 and Rallnoad Corridor. • ]mprovespltirdictability. i)rivc'l'hrouglty • Pedestrian-oriented C'onsidcr proltibitiiigcertain drive thniugh types throu};hout TC;C t,TC C 2,and]tailniad(orrid[tr�vith p[tssihle u�'cr]Ly,if design needed astlte'1'{;C:H and existingOld'Cown zone do not fully alien.I)rive th rough s gene rite excessive,•Chicle trips and other- Perniittc'd: wise interfere with the pedestrian tiacus ofthe'PC'C.Th,s iYilllcl InCILI{lt'Collc'e SI1G13ti and fast loud.l'harmacyand bank drive lilglcf;Lmilycictacl�cdfattachccl thr«ughsmayhcplact,(I vitltfnanallcy. Duplexes/townhouses Consider limiting low-d e nsity development,sucli as single family hm is!ng,and private stir race lxirking Pic!I!Ueswitliin thcTCC 1 and R.7ilroiLd C orridor to Inaintailt,'cnl�ance densityaltid vibrancy and encourage rc�clevelul>uticltit.'l'itiis lr7rkinn rctilrictian Multi-family(non-inixcd use) would apple-to privnte surf icc parking Iotsthat arc n'(4 ancillaryto.i principal use(e.g,pri+,Ltidy-owned.ror-profit surRic'e Parking Facility(private) parking Iots). General and Minimum 11 ' + ' Pedestrian Treatments Pedestrian pathwayswith a C:larifirtj'catlLcrproteetit III Wit}isadirncnsional standard fornewdevelopmentsuchasa minimum ot•4li,•ct required liiran'i3iIlLs. . Preserve Old Town c'hanW in IMterials requhYd. with accomnwdations forADA requirements related to cleanceight and protrusion.Apphcs to host t+vu floors ol•huildings. context. WalkwaysslialI haveweather Remove term"amenities"forreferences to pedestrian infrast rue[ti re uud treatments. • Pedestrian-oricnt(xl protection%vithin 20 feet of cuff- Consider 0 1 d Town district speciflcstandards that ntay gotxyaud the requirement(4d.)1n order to itwinla!n the desired streets. t[oiner en t ranoes, downt[M+vn t rc.Ltnxn ts. Traditional Neighborliood(ode Standards I Encroachments Allowed up to 2 feet on upper Clarify encroachments al lowed in any setback to include awningts oil first two floors For purposes beyond weather-relatedcover- E'etlestrian-oriented stories arc for people acccs:singthc building.ikwnings may tx.considered on upper fl(x)rs For aesthctic purposes, • design Additional Height Provision Allowed up to 20%in the"core" Obvinate prin•i,,ion.which may hca I�oldnver Frs�m bcFc�rc height vas incrcasccl ro INY in Old Town. • Maximi•res downtown of Old Town subject to alterna- tive compliance approv.il by tin.incia]productivity, Planning Director. Over 2o% •Al lour%more inarkct- (not more than 50%)allowed by based development. CUP. (ode (hanger for Consideration,continued SiteiBuilding Element Changes to Consider + Intent Architectural Details for + Utrance Orientation:l'rin}aid huilclingcntricti tihould face thCtitl'LCt.II the doorway(foes not hack the street,a marked and ww elI-In ainhiincd path c^ionn(Tr Development Code and the entry toa sidewalk ornon-mntorived pathway.Buildings shall have at least one pedestrian entrance orientedtoaArect. Architecture Standards + Windows: Manual IASM), a Consistcntlyspaccit and:similarly shaped windowx with trine orotherdecorathm in lding shall he incorporated on all building stories. o Aminimumof:30%opaque windows or doors are requiredonground-floor street-facing facades. Fra?phasr's on First Two o A mininnuil ar2ofie non•op gkiewvindowcoveragv is rcciuircd on upper stories, Rom for street-racing + Siding: fiuilding siding must he urshowa likeness to traditional materials typical nfhixturic hue Iding,%within the downtown core(hrick,stone,or wood)rurat features least:;A)%of the sidingarea. Highly reflective materialsareprohibited. . 4lasimi7esdowntown + llooN:H tchcd rook,shall i neorporate eaves an(]contain 2 or more roof plane-, Flat r(x)N,shall provide a deLorative cornice or design(ktail that creates financial productivity. interest al the top of the roof.Rooftop mechanical equipment shall he screened from public view at ground lcwrl by incorp ornik)n offabse roots,paralx tq. fcncinl; lattice,orsbullarm;aterial. + A]lows more market- *+ Floor Differentiation:I)iff ntiation shall to prowridcd between Hoorn which niny include porchuw,balconies.uwnings,tmlliscs,achange in material,reces ,s projections,or similar treatment. + Facade Treatments:Facades greater than 50 feet in length shall incorporate recesses or projections with a minimum 2-Foot differentiation along at least Mvn- ty ixrcent(2(din)of the length orthe facade. + Corner LA)l_s:Builiin&P4 located on corner lots shall.incorporate a chanitcred or beveled corner(or simibarlook)to al low for greater acccstiand mobibityfor pedestrians at these comers.The charnkrecl or bemledcorner is preferred to he the main first fisxorentrance.]'his design maintainathe historical lcxok ofOld Town and traditional corner buildinhdesirvi.It also maintains[lie preferred sight triangle desired byACIID at intersection,. + Treatment of blank side walls:Uninterrupted expanses of blank side walls longer than 30 feet that are visible From public right-of-way shall incorporate one or More of the following a Vegetation such�G�trees,shrubs.ground cover and/orvinen adjacent to[lie wall surface; o Artwork,such asa mural,trellis/vine panels,crrhas-rclicfxculpturc;and 4 Architectural det ailing,reveals,contrasting materials,orsimilair treatment_ [ode Changes for Consideration,continued Procedures&Criteria For Design Departures 0. Administrative Design Dcparlures_De- Amending the Architectural When design standards apply,consideration of sign departures that are less than 10%ofa Standards Manual (ASM) relief valves for new or expanded development dimensional design standard are adminis- may be advisable to provide ftexibiiity.While a Eliminate the Design Standards l:xcep- .yariancc can be applied for to mncfifi dc�clop tered by city staff lions"section in lieu of the proposed design ment requirements such as lot size,lot cover_ • Review Board Design Departures.Dc- departure procedures recommended above, age,Setbacks,parking spaces,and height of sign departures proposed other than those which may apply broadly. buildings,theytaiso trigger specific require- that constitute less than 111%.of a numeri- + Exclude the proposed TCC District,if es- ments and a"high bar"offindinpN per§67-6516 cal or dimensional standard❑ ay reviewed tablished,from the ASM. of the Idaho code,Waivers for architectural and decided by the Planning Commission dodp elements,however(wh0heradminis_ orothorquasi-judicial hod}',such as a dc- trative or by a review beady)may he based on sign review board as and ifestabiished by speci lic criteria estabiished by the city,such as thecity. the following: MULTIPLEROOIF FLOOR DECORRTWE Example of a illustration for PLANES OIFFERENTWTIOU CORNICE + The applicant's design team has thoroughly incorporating fa4ade and roof examined how the requirement could be treatments into a code update. applied as written. + 'I'ite proposed design departure meets the intent and general direction set forth by the requirement and/or adopted policy by the city. • The specific change is superior in design [ quality to that potentially achieved by the I J requirement. �1 • The departure is necessan•to better ad- q dress aspects of the site or its surrounds ngs. �1 • The departure is part of an overall,thought- f il,and comprehensive approach to the de- sign oFthe project. £NTRYWATS RECMICHS AND • The applicant has responded to optional ORIENTED TO STREET PROJECTIONS am side rations,if any,Found within the standard. Alternatively,the departure may he granted iE (A)the specific use requires a unique site and > of a supporting illustration far blank-wall treatments in a code update. building development that would otherwise prohibit meeting the intent or(B)the location ofexistingbuildings or structures prevents con- formance with the standard. —�