HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-07-22 Regular Meridian City Council Work Session July 22, 2025.
A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, July
22, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison.
Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug
Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock.
Members Absent: Liz Strader.
Other Present: Tina Lomeli, Bill Nary, Linda Ritter, Nick Napoli, Clint Dolsby, Tracy
Basterrchea, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis.
ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE
Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock
Anne Little Roberts X John Overton
_X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener
X Mayor Robert E. Simison
Simison: Council, we will call the meeting to order. For the record it is July 22nd, 2025,
at 6:00 p.m. We will begin tonight's regular City Council meeting with roll call
attendance.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Simison: Next item up is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you would all, please, rise and join
us in the pledge.
(Pledge of Allegiance recited.)
COMMUNITY INVOCATION
Simison: We had no one sign up for the community invocation.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Simison: So, we will move on to adoption of the agenda.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Move we adopt the agenda as presented.
Overton: Second.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 2 of 41
Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda. Is there any discussion? If
not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda
is agreed to.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics
Simison: Madam Clerk, anyone signed up under Public Forum?
Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. No one has signed up.
COMMUNITY PRESENTATIONS [Action Item]
1. Meridian Police Department - Officer Rodriguez recipient of the
Enrique S. Camarena Award
Simison: Okay. Then with that we will move on to Item 1, which is a community
presentation from the Meridian Police Department regarding Officer Rodriguez, recipient
of the Enrique S. Camarena Award. So, I will turn this over to Chief Basterrechea.
Basterrechea: If you don't mind I will turn the dais around, so -- I would rather look at
them than you. Sorry. So, the reason that we are here tonight is to recognize doc --
Officer Robert Rodriguez, one of our school resource officers. He has been named the
2024-2025 recipient of the Enrique Kiki Camarena Award for the State of Idaho. He
was formerly recognized earlier this summer by the Idaho Elks Association at a
convention held on June 7th at the Center of the Universe, Wallace, Idaho. And we are
here to honor him tonight. This recognition is presented annually by the Benevolent and
Protective Order of the Elks Awareness -- Drug Awareness Commission, which is very
involved with the Meridian Anti-Drug Coalition and we are very thankful for your
involvement with that. It honors law enforcement professionals who demonstrate an
unwavering commitment to drug prevention and education. Officer Rodriguez was
selected by his peers for exemplifying the principles and values championed by DEA
Special Agent Enrique S. Camarena. Sacrifice, integrity and dedication to public
service. For those of you who don't know Special Agent Camarena was -- life was
tragically taken in 1985 while fighting drug trafficking and he remains a symbol of
courage and purpose in the law enforcement community. The award bearing his name
continues to honor those who work tirelessly to protect and educate their communities.
As a school resource officer with the Meridian Police Department at Mountain View High
School Officer Rodriguez has dedicated himself to building trust with students,
promoting healthy decision making and creating a safe and supportive environment for
Idaho's youth. His ability to connect with children and provide a positive impactful
presence in their daily lives is recognized as a rare and invaluable gift. This marks the
second time a Meridian Police Department officer has received this distinguished honor.
In 2021 Officer Leroy Sonata was also named the Camarena Award recipient
underscoring the department's ongoing dedication to the meaningful youth engagement
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 3 of 41
and substance abuse -- abuse prevention. One thing I would point out, too, is this really
highlights the work that our school resource officers do every day in West Ada School
District and the high bar that they set for those other school resource officers around the
state and we are very appreciative of all of that. So, with that we would like to
congratulate Officer Rodriguez on his well-deserved recognition and thank him for his
ongoing commitment to public service and to the students and student advocacy and for
drug prevention and drug awareness. So, if you would come up, Robert, we will present
you with the plaque from the Idaho Association. We also have the bust that will stay
with Robert for over the next year and another plaque that will have his name on it as
well, with the other awardees.
Rodriquez: I just want to say thank you to Susie and -- come on up here, Susie. To
Susie with the Elks Lodge, also a member of the MADC and thank you to the gals over
at the MADC. You guys are amazing. And, most importantly, my wife. Come on.
Nope. Come on up. For putting up with my 17 year career in law enforcement to date.
For being an amazing woman and best friend, so -- I really don't have a whole lot to say.
I don't speak a whole lot. I just want to mention how large the print is for the chief to
read this stuff. I will be there one day I'm sure.
Stertz: We are very proud of him. We are very proud of him and we sure had a lot of
fun in Wallace.
Rodriquez: You said you weren't going to tell anybody.
Stertz: Oh, I didn't say anything.
Simison: Well, Officer, on behalf of myself and the Council, congratulations and I will
just say this. Whenever we would go to Mountain View you make a world of difference
for everyone around you and it's clear. So, appreciate what you do and horns up.
ACTION ITEMS
2. Public Hearing for Idaho Power McDermott Substation (H-2025-0008)
by KM Engineering, LLP., located at SW corner of McMillan Rd and
Owyhee Storm Ave.
A. Request: Annexation of 2.69 acres of land from RUT in Ada County
to the R-15 zoning district.
B. Request: Conditional Use Permit to allow the development of an
Idaho Power Substation.
Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to the rest of our scheduled work for this
evening. So, next up will be a public hearing on Item H-2025-0008 and we will open
this public hearing with staff comments.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 4 of 41
Ritter: Okay. I was giving everyone a chance to funnel out. So, good evening, Mayor
and Council Members. Linda Ritter, Planning Department. So, tonight we are here for
an annexation and conditional use permit for property located at the southwest corner of
McMillan Road and Owyhee Storm Avenue. The site consists of two and a half acres of
land. It's -- we are annexing 2.69 acres of land from RUT in Ada county to R-15 zoning
district and a conditional use permit to allow for the development of the Idaho Power
Substation. So, this application went through a record of survey in the county to parcel
out this two and a half acres, because normally county property -- it's five acres per lot,
but they allowed this one time split for the two and a half acres. So, that they are
proposing the construction of this new substation to enhance the reliability and
resilience of electrical services in Meridian and the surrounding areas of Ada county.
Currently customers in this region are served by Can-Ada Substation in Nampa and the
Ten Mile Substation in Meridian. So, the rapid ongoing growth throughout the Treasure
Valley has placed increased demand on these existing facilities leading to service strain
and reduced reliability. The proposed substation is particularly designed to
accommodate future growth and development, while also alleviating pressure on the
existing infrastructure. While rerouting service lines, the new facility will not only serve
new residents and commercial customers, but also improve service continuity and
reliability for current users. The site is proposed to be developed with the substation
that includes up to two transformers, each to serve four distribution feeders up to two
breakers beneath the transmission termination structure of the two metal clad
structures, which managing -- managed to switch to distribution feeders. One small
control building, which houses racks of switches and communication equipment and
one transmission dead-end structure, which connects to the -- with the transmission line
on McMillan Road. So, the public utility major public infrastructure is a permitted use in
the R-15 district upon approval of a conditional use permit and compliance with the
specific use standards for the UDC. Staff has determined that the proposed project
align with these standards and is essential to support the area's long-term utility needs.
Access to the property will be via McMillan Road and Owyhee Storm. So, it's designed
to meet the standards in accordance with the ACHD requirements. These two access
points are necessary to safely accommodate the maneuvering of large transport
vehicles during frequent -- Infrequent deliveries of major electrical equipment, such as
transformers, breakers, metal clad switch gear to the substation. Under typical
operation conditions a single access point would generally be sufficient to support
routine inspection and maintenance activities. The substation yard will be graveled to
allow for safe operation of the ground grid system underneath the service. The gravel is
specific for utility use. It's a typical three inch rod that also allows for water drainage.
Since no vehicle parking occurs within the substation the applicant is not proposing to
pave the surface inside the yard. Although the development of the power station is
located within a residential zone, the applicant is proposing a 30 foot landscape buffer
along the west side of the property to mitigate any noise that may generate -- along the
west and south side to mitigate any noise that may be generated from the substation.
Although there is no building the applicant is proposing an eight foot tall precast stamp
concrete wall along McMillan and Owyhee Storm Avenue frontages. Staff is also
requiring the wall to be extended around the whole substation. Basically because it is
abutting residential zones. So, they will be required to go through a certificate of zoning
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 5 of 41
compliance and design review prior to building permit issuance for the wall. The
Comprehensive Plan goal is to require appropriate building design and landscaping
elements to buffer screen, beautify and integrate commercial multi-family and parking
lots into existing neighborhoods. Although this has not been developed yet, but this is
zoned for residential and we are looking at development applications that may come in
for residential in this area. So, the maximum height of fences involved within a
residential zone is six feet. The applicant is requesting alternative compliance through a
separate permit outside of this process to increase the height of the proposed wall to
eight feet in order to maintain site security and deter trespassing. So, at a later date,
upon approval of the annexation. So, they had requested barbed wire on top of a fence
for them, but barbed wire is not allowed within residential areas, so staff is not in
agreement with that. And, then, also the applicant will be asking for a DA provision that
would allow deferral of landscape installation until development occurred within The
Fields District, citing the lack -- the current lack of available water in the area. But,
however, there is water within the Owyhee Storm Avenue. There was a 12 inch water
line and it goes to the intersection of Owyhee and McMillan Road. That does not have
a timeline for when the development, particularly on properties adjacent to the subject
site, will move forward. While irrigation infrastructure is not available yet, city water is
available within the Owyhee Storm and there is an existing irrigation ditch and box that
is located along the northern portion of the property. The applicant has approached
Public Works staff regarding temporary use of city water for landscaping until an
irrigation pump can be installed. Public Works doesn't have any objection to enter into
an agreement allowing the use of city water for a five year period, after which the
irrigation pump must be operational. Per UDC 11-3B-14 all required landscape and
irrigation system and site features must be installed in accordance with the approved
landscape plan prior to the final project approval, as there is no separate occupancy
approval process. So, staff does not support the applicant's request as there is no
mechanism to delay this landscaping installation, which is required -- which is a required
component of the development. Deferring the landscape would hinder the
establishment of mature -- of a mature vegetative buffer, which is essential to provide
adequate screening for future adjacent residential development. So, the Commission
recommended approval with the conditions that were outlined in our staff report. This
issue of deferring the landscape -- I don't think it was brought up at the Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting. We did talk about the wall, but this came after the
hearing, so just wanted to put this front and center before you. We had no one
commenting on the application, other than the applicant and the property owner. Again,
the only discussion that really took place was about the concrete stone wall surrounding
the entire property, rather than a chain link fence on the south and west side of the
property. We have had no comments since the hearing and other than that staff will
stand for any questions that you may have. But I do have Clint here to talk about the
water in the roadway if you have questions.
Simison: Thank you, Linda. And, Clint, you look so much happier to be here than on
vacation. Council, any questions for staff?
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 6 of 41
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Linda, just one question for you about this request. Forego the landscape
buffer until developments occurred in The Fields District. Is there any specificity
provided about that? I mean there is development that has already occurred within The
Fields District and so I'm trying to figure out what -- what it is they were trying to
accomplish. Was it, again, more about maybe a miscommunication about the lack of
services or was there something else that was driving it?
Ritter: The applicant will be able to explain this more to you. We have been in -- we
have had a meeting. It is my understanding they have talked with Nampa Irrigation
District because -- first I thought this was under Settlers Irrigation, but it's under Nampa
Irrigation District. There is water that flows through here, but I think it floods the field for
irrigation right now. It flows across the field from the south of the property. But, again,
there is an irrigation box and irrigation also flows from this side across through here and
on through and, then, there is some kind of concrete ditch along here where water
flows, but I don't know if it's just flooded. I didn't get a chance to talk to anyone from the
irrigation district. I think -- I'm not sure. I think the applicant can better explain why they
would like to do this. It's just not something that staff is in support of.
Cavener: Okay.
Ritter: We would like to see this corner looking nice.
Cavener: Thanks. I have no other questions, Mr. Mayor.
Simison: Council, any additional questions for staff? All right. Then would the applicant
like to come forward?
Hopkins: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. Stephanie Hopkins with KM
Engineering. Our address is 5725 North Discovery Way in Boise.
Hazel: David Hazel. 1221 West Idaho Street. Idaho Power.
Hopkins: Thank you for considering our request this evening. I'm here with Idaho
Power to request annexation into the R-15 district and a conditional use permit for
public infrastructure for the McDermott substation, which is in northwest Meridian.
Linda did an awesome job of giving a -- an overview of our request and we will keep our
presentation pretty -- pretty short. Did you get my presentation? Thank you. Am I able
to control it or -- okay. So, Idaho Power has worked with the adjacent property owners
in this area to locate the substation in this -- in this area specifically. They plan to build
the substation here to serve this area of Meridian and Ada county. As we all know,
Meridian specifically in this area is growing very quickly. This is in The Fields sub area
plan, which is anticipated to include a mixture of uses. Industrial, commercial,
residential and multi-family uses and there are projects that are being contemplated
currently that will be directly adjacent to this site. So, that's the -- when I think staff was
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 7 of 41
saying Fields District, that's probably the project that they were speaking of and that's
what our request is for pressurized irrigation and landscaping, which we will provide
more information about a little bit later. So, the -- the objective of this is to provide
reliable and adequate electricity in this area and for all of Ada county. So, this is a
graphic just to show how this all works. Substations are the point in which Idaho Power
serves their customers directly. As this graphic shows there are multiple ways in which
power is generated. It's moved from a larger switching station to transmission lines and,
then, to businesses, homes and users. Idaho Power's objective is to meet the demand
of existing and future customers in this area, while we are leaving existing facilities.
Currently customers in this area are served by the Can-Ada substation, which is Nampa
and the Ten Mile substation in Meridian. The -- this substation, McDermott substation,
will connect to the existing Northside substation with a new 138 kilovolt wire from the
existing 230 kilovolt transmission line poles, those large apparatus along McMillan. This
is located at the southwest corner of Owyhee Storm and McMillan, close to Owyhee
High School. There is proposed to be -- or there are proposed to be two points of
access, one to McMillan and one to Owyhee Storm. Both will be secured with gates.
There will be -- the entire yard will be securely fenced and as staff mentioned initially we
were requesting to have two of our boundaries with chain link and since, then,
commission has recommended that those boundaries, the -- the south and west
boundary of the site be -- include the precast concrete wall, which is what's proposed on
the north and east. We think that with this addition that the -- a request to defer
landscaping will be a little bit more palatable. It will be a presentable and nice project
until landscaping is installed and future development comes through. So, the -- let's
see. The internal yard is going to be graveled. There -- the site is designed to include
two transformers, two breakers, two component metal clad. Transmission will come in
from the dead end, which will go into the transformer, which steps the electricity down
from 138 kilovolts to four 12.5 kilovolt distribution feeders that will go out to customers
through the metal clad. Commission recommended that we include the precast
concrete walls mentioned and our request this evening is to -- we have two requests.
So, we would like to request that a DA provision be added to allow landscaping and
pressurized irrigation to be deferred until future development comes in. There are
several projects in The Fields District that are being contemplated currently and within a
certain time frame they will come in and bring services with them and we just think that
it's realistic and logical that that landscaping be installed with that development, so it's
all cohesively done at the same time. Our second request is to extend the conditional
use permit time frame from two years to five years, just to allow this -- a little bit more
time to commence the use of the -- the public infrastructure. They anticipate that it will
happen within the two year time frame, but it would just be -- it would be nice to make
sure they have a little extra time if needed. So, we really appreciate Linda and Public
Works' coordination and help on the different components of this project. We have been
working with them and did mention it in our last meeting with the Commission that we
were hoping to defer -- or work through some kind of solution to defer the pressurized
irrigation and landscaping and just working with them in general on all of the
components of this project has been great. So, really appreciate that and thank you for
your consideration this evening. We will stand for questions.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 8 of 41
Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant?
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Your request -- the second request to have the CUP granted extended from two
years to up to five years. Is that because you need the time to install the new
transmission line and all the permitting that's required or like -- can you just give a little
more detail about why you would need that extra time to -- for that kind of buffer that
you are looking for?
Hazel: So, we are kind of working off our proposed timeline right when this project was
kicked out and there is a lot of variables leading up to this project that could extend our
time frame. I dearly want to complete this project within two years, but if there is an
issue with equipment or something else within the site that could extend our project
duration out. I think that's kind of why we are asking for the extension is if we do run
into those issues as we are getting materials coming in, you know, something pushed
on our side as far as design that we are still covered if we push a year or two.
Simison: And can you say your name for the record, please?
Hazel: David Hazel. Idaho Power.
Simison: Thank you.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor, quick follow up?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: On the landscaping pressurized irrigation being deferred, so, you know,
understand the staff commenting like there is really no way for us to sort of make sure
you do it; right? If -- other than on my honor I will do it kind of a thing. So -- and I think
that's a good point. Obviously, Idaho Power is a good, wonderful company, track record
in -- in the state, but how -- how do we have any assurance that it will get done and
done right if we don't have any way to ensure that it gets done if we give you that ability
right now?
Hopkins: So, Mayor, Councilman Taylor, I think you bring up a good point. Idaho Power
is a different -- I would say partner -- community partner with the city. They are not your
typical developer. They are perhaps in a different circumstance than most developers
and I think that there is an opportunity to probably work through some kind of
agreement with them, maybe, you know, through this application, through the
development agreement maybe there could be a memorandum of understanding or
something that's attached. We are asking for a situation that's not typical, right, and I
think that that's merited based on the public utility component of it. We have been trying
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 9 of 41
to create -- I think of solutions, too, and I think a development agreement is the easiest
way up front, with maybe in the provision we say that there has to be an agreement on
the site that's, you know, checked up on or -- or something along those lines. I don'
know if the city attorney maybe has any ideas, but --
Simison: Yeah. Mr. Nary, would a surety not work in this situation?
Nary: A what, sir?
Simison: A surety bond. Would that not work in this situation?
Nary: Well, we certainly can. I mean there is usually a time limit --
Simison: Correct.
Nary: -- for those, but, otherwise, yeah. that's -- that's one method you could use.
Simison: So, surety bond would work. It's a time limit, but they either -- they could
either pay the entire amount to pull it or a portion of it, depending upon the time frame
that's identified.
Hopkins: Mayor, I think Idaho Power is amenable to that and, you know, maybe just --
we could discuss further with staff to see what the parameters on that are or -- they are
willing to work with that. I think that would be a favorable outcome.
Hazel: And I think that kind of helps relieve some of our irrigation landscaping concerns
as well if that's deferred I should say.
Hopkins: Yeah. Absolutely. If we were able to do a surety to, you know, put up a bond
for the amount of money that would be required for the landscaping and the pressurized
irrigation I think that would give Idaho Power the ability to defer it in the way that they
want to and making the city able to actually make it right eventually.
Simison: And I will defer to Council's viewpoint and staff and -- staff on how easy that
is, but --
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: I appreciate I think you are giving a creative approach to this. I -- I am
curious to kind of hear how our staff would respond to this type of request and their
ability to manage that as well. It's an important consideration.
Ritter: So, Mayor, Council, we have been in that situation before. We have a project
that is at the corner of Ten Mile and McMillan Road that was a plat that was approved
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 10 of 41
and they did the same thing, bonded for their landscaping, and to date that landscaping
has not been installed and that bond is still there. I don't know how valid that bond is,
but the city has -- not saying that Idaho Power would do this, but the city has been
burned by putting in -- having someone bond for the landscaping and never put in the
landscaping and as far as this project, if we are waiting for the development that is
adjacent to this, we just don't know when that will come in. I know we have been
working with the property owners looking at doing some development there, but the
phases that are close to this property are not something that is immediate, that won't
happen anytime soon, so I don't know how far out that development would be and if we
waited for that we don't know when that landscaping might go in. So, staff has talked
internally about this and the -- we just don't -- there is no time frame for when that
development will come in and as, again, our code says with development this is all
supposed to go in. The city has offered an option for irrigation for the landscaping that
should assist with putting this landscaping in, because we would like to see some
mature landscaping on this property, because you have a 30 foot buffer to the south and
a 30 foot buffer to the west to help mitigate this substation for when the residential
development does come in. We don't want it to be like new landscaping that's coming
in that's not going to provide a sufficient buffer for this residential. So, we have been
upfront with the applicant that we are not in support of this based on our code and some
of the issues that we have had with bonding for landscaping. So, again, you guys get to
make a final call. That's just staff's position on this. Well, it depends. I imagine --
don't want to talk about the other situation in that context, but if -- but if people are not
adhering to their bond we have a different issue to address, because we should be able
to execute that bond and go do -- have the work done if it's past due, but if it hasn't
reached the requirements of the DA that's a different story. So, I think it depends on
how it's determined, because you can do a bond that says you have five years and
within five years we will -- you will either put it in yourselves or we will execute the bond
for you to have it done for you, because to me you are like asking for up to five years.
Well, it seems like five years is a great time frame. The landscaping needs to be put in
one way or the other. If that's what you are asking for I think it's fair for us to achieve
that same outcome however we choose to -- to alleviate the points that have been
raised by staff. But in two cents. Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Can you just walk me through, again, the reasons why
you want to defer? Is it just the uncertainty of timing? Is it the uncertainty of access to
pressurized irrigation water? Would you just remind me kind of why you want that
deferral?
Hazel: Yeah. I can field that one. So -- I mean it's really the lack of pressurized
irrigation and there was that depiction of -- earlier I think, Linda, you pulled up with the
irrigation box on the north side of our property. So, I was able to meet with Mark
Phillips. He is a private water owner out there. That water is part of the Nampa-
Meridian system, but they don't own that ditch is my understanding and so, basically,
meeting with Mark that vault that was shown on that drawing -- I don't have it up here,
but basically that's just a drain. So, we don't have any surface water readily available to
us on our property, because he is flood irrigating from the south to the north up to our
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 11 of 41
property; right? So, basically, our surface water is going to end at our substation, so we
are not going to want to flood our whole yard; right? So, we don't have an option to
drop a pump into that vault like we were talking earlier unfortunately. The other option I
think was the city water as well, right, which we are open to. I guess the -- the biggest
challenge I see there is I'm kind of hoping for like a final solution with this; right? So, if
we are putting in city water and we are going to be required to come back and hook up
to the pressurized irrigation system once it's available, we are going to be spending
additional dollars to reconfigure our system to tie into that; right? So, I guess the point
I'm trying to make is our hope would be -- is that once that pressurized irrigation is
available we can start our plantings out there and meet the code requirements
associated with that.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: I think that sounds reasonable, but you are also asking for a window of two to
five years. So, if you are hoping for some certainty about what your configuration is for
the -- the pressurized irrigation, like -- and I -- and I understand that seems like there is
a few moving parts here that we don't have all of our arms around in terms of what's
where and what we have --
Hazel: Right.
Taylor: -- my understanding would be that the city water would be sufficient pressurized
water for that and it may be two, three or five years or beyond before you would have
access to pressurized irrigation water and I don't know how that would -- issue is going
to be resolved. If we required you to -- if we didn't give you the deferral and you are
required to have the city water, there is no objection -- you could do that, you just don't
want to have to change that configuration maybe in whatever time frame that is when
the pressurized irrigation comes back. Am I tracking correctly?
Hazel: Right. And I mean it's the bigger picture, too; right? It's all kind of falling back
on the cost associated with this stuff and trying to rework stuff that we have already put
in. You know, I mean I just don't want to go shell out additional dollars if we are
reworking something just to get us by in the interim, if that makes sense, versus having
a complete system that's readily available, we can tie into it and do what we need to do
on the perimeter of our yard.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: So, do you have any idea what it would look like to move from a pressurized
system supplied by the city to irrigation? Because --
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 12 of 41
Hazel: I mean it's -- I'm sorry. Go ahead.
Taylor: Just to finish my point -- because the irrigate -- you know, the -- the irrigation,
you know, system to provide the water, that's not going to have to change, it's just going
to be how you are going to tie into it.
Hazel: Right.
Taylor: So, I'm having a hard time tracking how expensive that might be considering the
significant scale of infrastructure that's going to go into this anyway. So, help me
understand -- do you know what it take to switch from city pressurized water to
irrigation? And I don't know if you know the answer to that.
Hazel: Well, let's -- I'm going to throw out a round number, right, that I'm going to
ballpark off the top my head. I'm going to say 15,000 dollars. Fifteen thousand isn't
nothing; right? I mean that's something that we are going to have this project closed
out, this is going to be in operation and, then, we are going to have to come back and
spend that additional money for stuff that we already have functional to tie into that PI
system when it's available. I guess what -- what I'm trying to avoid is just the additional
rework; right? The additional dollars associated with that. So, if we come off the city
water, if that's the final solution that's -- you know, we can do that, but I think the -- the
preference would be is to come off the PI system once it's available. So, we are not,
you know, using water from the city water to feed our planting.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Either one of you, Stephanie or -- just talk to -- if you don't want to landscape
it what is it going to look like?
Hazel: So, that decorative concrete wall is -- I mean there were some depictions up
there earlier, but that's basically what the parameter would look like. It's a -- basically a
precast wall. It's stamped. It's got some decorative elements in it, depending on, you
know, which route we go. But that would be kind of the -- the focus of the substation;
right? Is the -- that concrete wall. You wouldn't have the trees on the perimeter. We
were talking about putting maybe xeriscape and some perma bark down on that 30 foot
swath, potentially, which we could still do without the water there. I guess that
answered your question?
Overton: Mr. Mayor, follow up?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Well, it does and it doesn't yet, because the trees do need water.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 13 of 41
Hazel: Correct.
Overton: And you are putting in xeriscape landscaping. I'm just curious how are you
watering the trees if there is no water out there?
Hazel: Like physically? Is that what you are asking?
Overton: Yeah.
Hazel: Well, if we have a source as of being either the city water or the PI system, we
can set that up on a regular schedule off a drip system to water our plants.
Overton: So, use the city water for the trees on the xeriscape landscape --
Hazel: No. Sorry. Let me back up. I'm saying the xeriscape is what we would try to do
as part of the interim period between that and the pressurized irrigation being available.
Once the pressurized irrigation is available we would use that water to plant those trees
and keep them alive.
Overton: Okay. My mistake is I'm looking through --
Hazel: If we hooked up to city water we -- we have the same thing, but it goes back to
the point of -- I'm trying to avoid the rework and additional cost if we possibly can; right?
Simison: How about we trade you landscaping for moving the poles on McMillan over
just a little bit to allow that road to be widened. It seems like a deal to me. Okay. All
Right. Did anyone sign up to provide testimony on this item?
Lomeli: Mr. Mayor, no one has signed up.
Simison: Okay. Is there anybody in the audience that would like to provide testimony?
Just so we at least know where we stand. I'm not seeing anyone coming forward or
raising their hand. So, we will let you stay there until Council is either done with
questions or ready to close the public hearing, unless you have any final comments that
you want to try to make at this point. I heard a pop in the system. He has got Bills.
Taylor: Can you just tell me -- and maybe staff can help, too. I'm curious about the
conversations with the Nampa Irrigation District. Is there -- I mean it sounds like some
changes to the system have to be in place for you to have access and I'm not totally
tracking what all changes need to be. Do you -- can you provide some insight like what
will have to happen before you will have access to that? And I don't know if -- Linda, if
you know the answer to that or, David, if you -- what conversations you have had where
you have any idea what they are going to have to do to -- in order to provide you with
that?
Hazel: You just mean the PI system?
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 14 of 41
Taylor: Yes. Correct.
Hazel: They just need to kind of get it to our property. I believe it's coming from the
west to the east; right?
Taylor: And did you have any sense of time frame from them, like -- how that's going to
happen?
Hazel: It's kind of up in the air at this point.
Taylor: Because it seems like we just have no clue when you are going to have access
to that. It could be next year. It could be in five years. It could be like -- Nampa
Irrigation District will just do whatever they want, because water rules everything; right?
I'm just having a hard time tracking when we could have any expectation of that and it
just seems very vague and open-ended and, Linda, I don't know if you have had any
communication with them that -- because I read their letter on that -- in the application.
It's very unhelpful.
Ritter: Mayor, Council Member Taylor, correct, that irrigation district did not provide
much information and I think from the conversation we have been having are you guys
waiting for the development to occur that's adjacent to you to bring that over to your
property or --
Hazel: Yes. That's my understanding.
Ritter: And I guess that's the city's issue. We don't know when that development is
coming and so we don't have a time frame. We don't -- there is a lot of unknowns, so
that's staff's position on it, so --
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Still trying to grasp my head around what this is eventually going to look like.
What landscaping is your final plan?
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, we do have a landscape plan that shows 30
feet along the west and south boundary and, then, if it's on the screen now there is a
variety of vegetative ground cover and a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees
that's shown on the landscape plan. So, this is what, you know, is required by code and
this is what's being provided as far as part of the conditional use permit. There is an
option in code to xeriscaping, which is kind of what David was alluding to, would
provide, you know, same vegetation -- similar vegetation, more rockscape and -- and
there are certain standards you have to meet. Still requires pressurized irrigation,
obviously, to keep the vegetation in place and -- and healthy, but would require less
water. So, that's an option I think once pressurized irrigation is available. But our
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 15 of 41
request to you is that there be a DA provision or something -- some kind of agreement
that would allow them to defer the requirement for pressurized irrigation and
landscaping, just currently period, essentially, until development to the west comes in
and brings in pressurized irrigation, so that it could all be completed cohesively and
together at the same time, so -- and we recognize that the timeline is tricky. That's the
big thing that we have been trying to wrap our minds around, too. And I think that's
where, you know, it's important to remember that Idaho Power is not a typical developer
and I think there is an opportunity to kind of work through some -- something -- some
kind of agreement or solution that would work for everyone.
Overton: Mr. Mayor, follow up.
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: So, if I'm looking at this picture on the left, talking greenscape, if you had
irrigation water as we went through this right now and you -- you put everything in, it
wouldn't be xeriscape, am I correct?
Hazel: Correct.
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Councilman, yes.
Overton: So, is there any reason I shouldn't logically figure that if you pay the money to
put in a xeriscape and, then, you get your water, you are not going to also, then, pay to
have all that removed, so you can go back in and do the landscaping right? And it might
be cheaper to pay the 15,000 dollars to hook up to the irrigation? It seems like if you
are putting in xeriscape now and you are going to have to yank that out to put in the
greenery in the future --
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, I -- maybe I will restate how we -- so, the
xeriscaping is really another option if pressurized irrigation is available. It wouldn't be
an option without pressurized irrigation, because you wouldn't be able to keep the
vegetation healthy and alive. So, right now we are proposing to just defer any kind of
landscaping until pressurized irrigation is available. So, the xeriscaping would be an
option that we had considered that would require less water in the future when they do
hook up to pressurized irrigation. Does that make sense? It's a little convoluted.
Hazel: I might have made that more difficult when I stated my answer earlier, too,
when I said xeriscape. I was just referring to before we put the plantings in, before we
get water, we could put some rock mulch on the -- on the borders of this thing and make
it look pretty until we have the water to get the plants in.
Hopkins: And, Mr. Mayor, Council --
Overton: So, I'm trying to tie up. I want to -- because, obviously, I don't want to see this
as dirt.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 16 of 41
Hazel: Right.
Overton: I want to see it landscape. But if you are landscaping it -- and I see this
picture on the left and it's all green -- and, then, I see the gravel, I'm just -- my logic is
you are going to have to rip all that back out and put in the landscaping that you would
initially intend to put in.
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, I think that there is an image in our
presentation that shows some like substations that have a similar -- it's kind of a rock
mulch that they put out in front of -- it is really common in Ada county. So, the project on
the right with the trees, obviously, wouldn't be included if we were to defer the
landscaping, but the rock mulch would be included with the eight foot precast concrete
wall and that does -- I mean it provides a nice frontage in the interim we think. It's a
good -- I think a good solution while they wait for pressurized irrigation to come. So,
that's what they would propose. It would be the -- kind of decorative rock mulch with the
precast concrete wall.
Overton: Mr. Mayor, follow for staff.
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Is that consistent with the landscape plan that was submitted that was seen
by Planning and Zoning?
Ritter: No, that's not what was -- the landscape plan that -- this is what was
recommended for approval by Planning and Zoning Commission. And I just want to
make a clarification. So, it's not xeriscape, it's water conserving. So, what it does is
reduce the landscape buffer by 50 percent and you do more water conserving plants
within there, but it -- it's kind of more like a simulated riverbed, boulders, and things that
go along there, but you still have to have your irrigation system. But that's not what was
proposed with this development. If it's something that they are asking for, because what
we would look at is what was approved with this DA with this -- what you guys would
approve. So, this is the landscape plan that has gone through the process. We don't
have anything different. So, if they are proposing something different that is something
that we need to look at to make sure that they are meeting the requirements and, again,
it doesn't take away the irrigation obligation, so -- I don't know -- it's like I don't know if --
and I keep hearing you say that you would have to go back and redo all this. I don't
know if it's something that can be looked at ahead of time as far as how you layout your
irrigation to say when that irrigation comes how you would hook up to what you are
putting in with the -- say if you did use city water and then -- but plan it for when you do
hook up your pressurized irrigation that you don't have to -- to realign your lines with
that, but --
Hazel: And I understand what you are saying there. I guess my comment was I'm
thinking of a bare minimum; right? We got to get something out there to dig these pipes
up once the pressurized irrigation is in. Kill everything, basically, and, then, tie
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 17 of 41
everything back into what they have done previously. So, I think that 15,000 dollar
number, right, I'm just using that as kind of like a ballpark right now; right? But I mean at
the end of the day it's still additional costs that we are incurring and that's what I'm trying
to avoid.
Hopkins: Can I just mention one thing, too? I think the Mayor brought up a really good
option that we had kind of considered, too, was the idea of a surety that would be
placed with the city and would really give you the reassurance that this would happen in
the future and I think, you know, that could be tied to the development agreement in a
way that would be easy to enforce or easier to enforce than maybe some other things.
So, that's probably what we would defer to as, you know, a preference if -- if that's
something that you are all amenable to.
Ritter: Mayor? As far as the surety -- because you did mention that there is a timeline
on the surety and so we have not established a timeline at this point. So, do you guys
have a timeline that you are looking at? Because that's the thing that staff doesn't know.
We don't have a timeline and so it can't be out there for infinity, so --
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Members of Council and staff, I think -- I mean we have
acknowledged that it's tricky; right? We don't know exactly when things are going to
develop. We don't know when pressurized irrigation is going to be available. And so
that's why we are kind of asking for solutions and trying to think creatively how to, you
know, marry both the city's -- what the city wants and what Idaho Power is hoping to do
and I think we all serve -- you all serve the same constituents and the same people. So,
the goal is to try to give their customers rates that are great and -- and try to make sure
that the city is getting what they want on property, too. So, I -- I mean -- but we -- yeah,
we acknowledge that the timing is tricky and we don't know if -- I don't have a solution
for that unfortunately.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: I just got to throw this out there. It's not usual that we end up with an
application in front of us that's been changed since it's gone in front of Planning and
Zoning have been approved and in this case we also have a situation where that
development could happen in six years and we could put a surety bond on for five
years. You are still paying 15 grand -- or maybe you are paying 25 grand, because it's
five years from now and it costs more money. I'm having a real hard time justifying why
we need to do that and not stay consistent with how we operate as a city.
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Councilman --
Simison: I think it's going to cost them more for a surety bond long term, but that's how
they want to do it. That's -- that's their -- their choice -- or your choice. I don't want to
say it's their choice. Then if it's not even an option don't even put it out there.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 18 of 41
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Overton, I want to just clarify -- we haven't changed
anything at the application. The landscape plan that's still -- that's in front of you right
now is what we presented with conditional use permit and that is what Idaho Power
intends to install once pressurized irrigation is available. Our request this evening is to
add a DA provision to the DA to allow them to defer that landscaping. So, if you were to
approve it tonight without that DA provision they would be required to install this
landscaping. They are not proposing xeriscaping, it's just something that code allows
and that had been contemplated at one point. This is what's being proposed.
Hazel: And I guess I would just like to add -- I mean if it is a requirement that we are to
put this landscaping in, you know, as part of our build out, certainly possible with the city
water. I just want to be clear that we are -- Idaho Power is incurring additional costs to
try and reconfigure stuff that isn't necessarily there or we are hoping is going to be
there; right? I think that's just kind of the main point. I mean if we have to tap onto the
city water and we have to have irrigation I understand that. I guess I just kind of want
to, you know, make it clear that we are incurring additional costs that, in, turn we can --
Hopkins: Thank you for the conversation. It's really nice to be able to discuss and kind
of figure out --
Simison: Well, you are getting more money from me each month now with the new
PUC rolls on solar, so consider that my contribution to the project. Sorry. That was for
you, Paris.
Whitlock: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Yes, Council Member Whitlock. Council Member Whitlock, yes.
Whitlock: Thank you, Mayor. Stephanie and David, thank you. Just to build off of what
Councilman Overton was asking, just in my mind if -- if this gets the green light tonight
with a development agreement that at some point you will put in the landscape, once
you get out there, starting put -- start putting the transformers in, you put the eight foot
decorative wall up, what will be on that 30 foot buffer to the north, south, east and west
until development comes and you are able to tap into the -- the PI? What -- what will
this look like for five -- up to five years if this gets the green light tonight as is --
Hazel: Some of these --
Whitlock: -- with the development agreement that you are --
Hazel: Yeah. Sorry to interrupt you. Some of these images that you are seeing up
here right now, if you can see them, is basically what it would look like without the -- the
trees and everything. I mean the image on the right has trees in there, but we could just
remove those and you would have the rock mulch and the concrete wall.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 19 of 41
Whitlock: Mayor, just a quick follow up. So, again, the concern that this just would have
a nice decorative precast wall and be surrounded by dirt is not what you would envision
for the next two to five years once -- once this substation goes in?
Hopkins: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Whitlock, that's correct. Yeah. It would be the rock
mulch.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Move we close the public hearing on Item No. 2.
Taylor: Second.
Simison: I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any
discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it
and the public hearing is closed.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Cavener: Council, I will just weigh in.
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Thank you. Sorry, Mr. Mayor. Sorry. I appreciate that. Council, I -- I -- I see
this as a -- as a really simple application that I'm generally in approval of. Stephanie
and team, I appreciate the request. There is just not a clear path here and you -- you
install vital infrastructure that is incredibly necessary and important for our community.
That vital infrastructure isn't always the most appealing for development to occur next to
and if you said, hey, five years, ten years -- if you gave me a pathway so that staff could
track this I think I could get there. Without knowing what that looks like it's -- just for me
I default back to -- to what our code is. So, I'm approving the application. I'm not in
support of waiving the -- the delay on a landscape buffer. I recognize that may require
you to connect to city services and use city water to take care of that until PI comes.
Just without a clear path it always makes me a little eerie to get outside of our regular
routine and without a clear path that just can't be supportive of that particular piece. So,
Council, that's where I will be tonight.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: I will be quick. Support a lot of what Council President Cavener said and
consistent with how I have done it in the past and I have to remember they are one of
the first ones out to this area, but they also want to be good neighbors to the residential
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 20 of 41
that's going to grow up around them and having that mature landscaping as it goes is a
pretty important part I think of being that good neighbor to the residential going around
them. I am in supportive of this application. I'm not in support of deferring the
landscaping.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: I'm in line with what was said and I don't like to impose additional costs if we
can avoid them certainly on businesses who are investing millions of dollars to provide a
critical infrastructure. So, I appreciate you -- the ask and I think it was warranted, but --
and I'm okay with the -- extending the conditional use permit time frame from two years
to five years, I think that seems reasonable to allow you the flexibility to do the business
that you need to do, but I think having installed sprinkler systems and before I -- I just
don't quite think that the cost is so significant that we would kind of want to jeopardize
what we would want to see here without any sort of surety. So, I think it's a good
application. I will support it, but not the deferral of the landscaping. Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Unless there is any additional comments I would be prepared to make a motion
that we approve -- after considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move that
we approve File No. H-2025-0008 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of
July 22nd, 2025, with the addition of extending the time frame of the conditional use
permit from two years to five years.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: I have a motion and a second. Is there a discussion on the motion?
Overton: Yes. Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: This motion includes that they will hook up to the city water?
Taylor: Yes. Mr. Mayor, thank you. I think -- correct. To -- to hook up to the city water
for the irrigation services. Thank you for clarifying.
Little Roberts: Second concurs.
Simison: Okay. Further discussion? If not, clerk call the roll.
Roll Call- Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea;
Whitlock, yea.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 21 of 41
Simison: All ayes. Motion carried and the item is agreed to. Have a good evening,
everybody.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
3. Public Hearing for Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision (H-2025-0006)
by The Land Group, generally located at the northwest corner of
Black Cat Rd and 1-84.
A. Request: Preliminary Plat to subdivide two (2) existing parcels into
eleven (11) building lots across three (3) phases in the I-L zoning
district on 88.20 acres of land.
Simison: Next we will move on to Item 3, which is a public hearing from Mogul
Industrial Park Subdivision, H-2025-0006. We will open this public hearing with staff
comments. Nick, nice to see you.
Napoli: Good to see you, too, Mr. Mayor. Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Members of
the Council. The next item on the agenda is the preliminary plat for Mogul Subdivision.
The applicant is proposing a preliminary plat consisting of 11 -- 11 building lots across
88.2 acres within the I-L zoning district. The plat excludes the parcels containing the St.
Luke's Building, Building J and Building M. Development is proposed to occur in three
phases. The site is generally located at the northwest corner of Black Cat and 1-84 and
as shown on the screen the existing zoning is I-L and the FLUM designations are mixed
employment and low density employment. This property was annexed in 2021 at which
time the development agreement and -- a development agreement was established,
including specific requirements for road improvements, limited uses, timing thresholds
for extending a collector road through the site. It's important to note that subdividing the
property is not a requirement under the current DA. The applicant is choosing to do so
primarily for project phasing of additional buildings. This is the existing conditions out
there for the preliminary plat. This would be the St. Luke's building, Building M, and all
these buildings on the frontage are actually currently under construction -- or this
Building J. Building M will be here and these buildings are under construction currently,
which will be included in the plat with this back section. Might give you a little clearer
image right there. Although the configuration of the parcels may not appear connected,
the applicant has legally constructed boundaries through a series of adjustments.
According to the Ada county surveyor, as long as the parcels are connected via right of
way and the plat is signed by ACHD, the entire area can be treated as a single
preliminary plat. So, it will be these six parcels back here and the parcels fronting on
Black Cat right here. But these three parcels right here will not be included in the formal
subdivision. The surrounding parcels, while not a part of the plat, are also part of the
broader development and are governed by the CC&Rs ensuring shared responsibilities
for landscaping, roadways and cross-access. The Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area
Plan requires the collector roadway to be built within the part of the development. The
east-west collector, known as Grand Mogul, has already been partially constructed and
partially deeded to ACHD for the constructed portion. North-south collector roadway is
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 22 of 41
also a requirement and this will give you a better idea. This will be the north-south
collector on the very west boundary. Part of -- part of the north-south collector will be
proposed on Lot 3, Block 2, which will include a turnaround approved by ACHD.
However, as the city anticipates future development in this area there is a concern
about whether -- whether the connection at Franklin Road will align property on the
north and the south side. Staff has presented an alternative along the east side of the
Rosenlof Drain for logical city service expansion, but acknowledges the applicant's valid
concerns about the cost and feasibility for smaller developments on that side. So, as a
result of that staff has worked with the applicant since the -- the Commission hearing to
revise the condition to allow for future collaboration on the roadway alignment prior to
the final plat of phase three for this development. So, the city, the applicant and ACHD
can figure out what is the best alignment for that road at the time that the final plat for
phase three comes in, which is anticipated to be I think several years down the line and
regarding access, the entire development -- regarding cross-access, the entire
development is covered by CC&Rs, which will include a provision for cross -- cross-
access among parcels. As a -- as a result staff is comfortable allowing a reference to
the CC&Rs in the plat notes. Staff and Commission have recommended a few
modifications to the conditions of approval and I have displayed them on the screen for
you guys' reference. So, we will want condition 5-D to be striked, because it's a
repetitive primarily modification to 4-D to allow for the plat note to either have a blanket
cross-access easement or for it to reference the CC&Rs and, then, a modification to
condition three to allow for -- with the final plat phase three to allow for coordination for
that alignment of the north-south collector on the south and north side of Franklin Road.
And I would -- finally I would like to note that no public comments were received for this
application and staff is recommending approval with conditions and I will stand for any
questions you may have.
Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Would the applicant like to
come forward? Good evening. State your name and address for the record.
Densmer: I might be too tall. Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, thank you. My name is
Jason Densmer. I'm with The Land Group. I'm here -- my address is 462 East Shore
Drive in Eagle and I'm pleased to be here tonight representing the applicant for the
Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision. We appreciate Nick and your staff's work on this
application over the past several months as we brought it forward with them. Generally
tonight we are in full support of the staff report as written. I did want to give you just a
quick update on the project, because it has been in front of you before since it was
originally annexed into the city and entered into a development agreement. Things
have been going really well with the project. The Meridian Commerce Park has
constructed the St. Luke's building. Recently completed Building J and four additional
smaller format, light industrial buildings along the Black Cat frontage. We have also
improved the Black Cat frontage according to ACHD's conditions of approval for the
project and constructed about the first third of Grand Mogul, the east-west collector
road. Your approval, hopefully, tonight of the Mogul Industrial Park Subdivision will
allow us to continue moving forward in a -- kind of a methodical, logical development of
the overall project, still consistent with the development agreement and adhering to all
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 23 of 41
of the conditions that we know we have to do. The -- the Planning and Zoning
Commission -- we were pleased to have their recommendation for approval and, really,
the only things that we needed to talk about with them were this north-south collector
road that Nick mentioned will occur with our phase three of the development on the
western boundary of the project. There is just a lot of kind of haziness in the crystal ball
for that area of the project and the exact alignment of that roadway we think is best
deferred a few years into the future until there is a little bit more clarity about
development of the property to the west of us and where the intersection of that road
will need to align on Franklin Road. So, we are in support of the revised condition of
approval that was recommended to you by the Planning and Zoning Commission and
the two other minor modifications to conditions that Nick mentioned earlier. So, a lot of
words just went by. Hopefully you follow them, but if you have any questions I'm happy
to answer them. The short story is we are very happy with the recommendations of staff
and your Planning and Zoning Commission and hope to gain your approval tonight for
the preliminary plat.
Simison: Thank you. Counsel, any questions for the applicant? Okay. Thank you very
much. Madam Clerk, anyone signed up to provide testimony on this item?
Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. No one has signed up.
Simison: Okay. Is there anybody who -- who is present who would like to provide
testimony on this item? Or online? Seeing no one coming forward, would the applicant
like to make any file comments? Council, turn this over to you.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Move that we close the public hearing on Item H-2025-0006.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any
discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it
and the public hearing is closed.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Pretty straightforward application with it being a preliminary plat. I just -- I
want to note for Council, I know we spent a lot of time last week talking about the
service impact tool. This didn't exist in 2021. This came when this came in. It is there
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 24 of 41
today. I did hear from -- from fire and planning today again. Similar set of
circumstances. It's kind of away from town. Current conditions with access will likely be
resolved as development occurs, so I don't see any compelling reason why we would
want to delay at least getting the preliminary plat approved. So, Mr. Mayor, I'm going to
move that we approve Item 3, preliminary plat for H-2025-0006 as presented in the staff
report, notating the changes as presented by staff. Include all staff and applicant
testimony.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve item 3. Is there discussion on the
motion? If not clerk call the roll.
Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea;
Whitlock, yea.
Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Have a good evening.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
4. Public Hearing for AOCI Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (H-
2025-0029) by City of Meridian, located citywide and at 12504 W.
Amity Rd.
A. Request: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPAM) to modify
the boundaries of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), along with a
subsequent request to Ada County to re-establish the modified
boundary of the Area of City Impact (AOCI), which includes the
removal of 38 parcels totaling approximately 507.34 acres and
adds one 5.06 acre parcel.
Simison: All right. Next up is Item 4, which is public hearing for area of city impact
Comprehensive Plan Map amendment, which is H-2025-0029. We will open this public
hearing with staff comments. Good evening, Carl.
Anderson: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. My name is Carl
Anderson, long range associate planner here with the city. Tonight's presentation we
are going to go over the city's request to amend the city's future land use map --
comprehensive future land use map amending the boundaries of the land use map itself
and the city's area of impact. I will go through the reasoning behind the request, detail
some of the areas that are being impacted and the city's next steps. So, the why behind
the request -- in 2024 the Idaho state legislature amended Idaho Code 67-6526
pertaining to areas of impact. There are a couple key components here that I would like
to detail. One of those is establishing kind of a timeline that the city needed to address
modifying the boundaries of its area of city impact. So, there are -- the timeline -- the
deadline, essentially, for that area to be modified is December 31st of 2025. The city
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 25 of 41
has been in contact with Ada county and we are anticipating meeting that timeline.
Requires areas of city impact to be within two miles from city limits. Considerations for
service planning were also amended within Idaho Code as well. Essentially also
established that areas of impact are within the jurisdiction of Ada county. So, the
request will be followed by a request to Ada county to reestablish the city's area --
current or proposed area of city impact. Additionally one point of clarification within
Idaho Code is that it does clarify that city may adopt a comprehensive plan, conduct
infrastructure, capital improvements and other planning activities beyond its current
area of impact. So, while we are pulling back some of our boundaries due to the two
mile radius from city limits, we do anticipate that we will continue to plan for those areas
for -- anticipate future growth within those areas. So, being a citywide application this --
this request was noticed for a public hearing. Courtesy notices were sent to affected
property owners that -- whose properties were subject to the request. The removal --
the removed parcels impact 38 total parcels, 507 acres and some change parcel acres.
So, this does not include right of way. With the addition of one parcel totaling 5.06
parcel acres. This was a request supported as part of this application where the city of
Boise recently removed a parcel on Amity Road from its areas of city impact. The
resolution -- resolution for that action is with -- included within the staff report. The
proposed properties would be included in the area of city impact for Meridian with a
future land use map designation of medium density residential. There are no
development proposals with that request at this time, so as that property develops in the
future the applicant would need to come forward with their request to annex and
develop the property at that time. Additionally, entryway corridors would be modified
accordingly with this request. Where areas are being removed or added those entry
corridors that are impacted would be either extended or removed accordingly. So, the
map on the left details the area that's being removed from the city's area of impact. You
will see the change in the acres. This is 512 acres and some change that's inclusive of
right of way from that area. This is located generally the southwest corner of the City of
Meridian boundary -- area city impact boundary and future land use map. Of note there
are parcels included in this as permitted by Idaho State Code where that buffer might
bisect a parcel. If it's bisecting that parcel it may be included in the AOCI boundary, so
those parcels are included within -- within our proposed area of impact. The image on
the right is the area to be added, 5.07 acres. That is the parcel to be added to both the
FLUM and the city's area of impact with the designation, again, of medium density
residential matching those properties to the west of the subject parcel. The Planning
and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request on the public hearing
held on July -- June 26th, 2025, and forwarded their recommendation to City Council.
The next steps following Council decision tonight, staff will be requesting the
renegotiation with Ada county to reestablish the city's area of impact pending Council
approval. We will be back before you for a resolution, either within the coming months
or after that decision. Some of the timing related to resolution is still up in the air a little
bit, but we are working through that. With that I'm happy to answer any questions that
the Council may have.
Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff on this item?
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 26 of 41
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor. Carl, will you just help me understand -- when I was on the
Council previously we spent a lot of time talking about clean lines and this looks like it
does just the opposite, but I know there has got to be more behind it than what I'm
understanding. I'm just curious.
Anderson: Yes. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Little Roberts. So, again, this
is just removing those portions from the city's current future land use map and area of
impact that extend beyond that two mile radius. There is an exhibit in the staff report
that does detail what that buffer looks like as it bisects those parcels. So, those parcels
are within the city's capital improvement plans and future planning efforts. So, we would
like to keep them within the city's area of impact in future land use map where possible.
So, what you are seeing here -- maybe at the north most portion of the area to be
removed where it doesn't -- the lines don't necessarily square up, that's generally
following parcel boundaries.
Simison: The intention is to eventually include this in our area of city impact. Probably
in five years we will -- maybe have annexed far enough that we would -- next time we
update it we would include it. So, it would still be a nice clean line eventually.
Little Roberts: Great. Thank you. Thank you.
Anderson: Yeah.
Simison: Okay. Madam Clerk, anyone signed up to provide testimony?
Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. No. No one has signed up.
Simison: Is there anybody present who would like to provide testimony on this item?
Seeing no one coming forward, any last comments from staff?
Anderson: No, Mr. Mayor. Thank you.
Simison: Council, what's your pleasure or direction?
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Seeing no comments, I move we close the public hearing.
Cavener: Second.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 27 of 41
Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any
discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it.
The public hearing is closed.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: This is pretty straightforward. It's keeping us in alignment with the new state
code and I would be happy to move forward with a motion.
Simison: Okay.
Overton: Mr. Mayor, after approving all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to
approve File No. H-2025-0029 to remove the subject 507.34 acres from the city's future
land use map and area of city impact and include 5.06 acres as described to the area of
city impact and future land use map with a designation of medium density residential
and authorize staff to request -- apply with Ada County to re-establish the boundaries of
the city's area of city impact.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk
call the roll.
Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea;
Whitlock, yea.
Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Thank you very much.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
5. Public Hearing: Proposed updates to Title 4, Chapter 1, Meridian City
Code per Idaho Code section 50-344(2), regarding temporary and
project-specific solid waste collection
Simison: With that we will move on to Item 5, which is a public hearing for proposed
updates to Title 4, Chapter 1, Emergency Code, per Idaho State Code Section 50-344-
2. Mr. Nary.
Nary: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. You had this presentation in
front of you last week. So, for the record and for the public that may be watching, this is
a desire for our code to now match up to some changes that were put into place by the
last legislative session that does allow, even in areas where the franchise for solid
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 28 of 41
waste collection, like we have in the City of Meridian and the mandatory requirement to
use our franchisee for most solid waste collections, there is an exception that's been
created by the state legislature that allows that to be done by other entities other than
franchisees in -- in areas that are defined by the city. So, we have done that in this
particular case in creating, basically, an exception that allows for these to be done by
anybody, including the franchise -- or -- or -- either the current franchisee or any other
entity with a limited basis for a limited period of time. We have created a way that can,
then, be tracked and collected and adjusted through our system. Anyway, this allows
for an exception that's been created by the legislature and allows us to define what that
is and that's what this does, so -- we haven't had any additional comments since the last
presentation. And, again, we have vetted that through our Solid Waste Commission, as
well as with our current franchisee. So, we are ready to move this forward and, again,
whatever your pleasure is.
Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Okay. This is a public hearing.
Do we have anyone signed up to provide testimony on this item?
Lomeli: Mr. Mayor, no one has signed up.
Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present who would like to provide testimony on this
item?
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Move we close the public hearing on Item No. 5.
Taylor: Second.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Motion and second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If
not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public
hearing is closed.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
6. Public Hearing: Proposed updates to Title 1, Chapter 7, Section 9, of
Meridian City Code regarding City Councilmembers' Compensation
Simison: So, with that we will -- have under ordinances -- you want to move on to the
next couple items? Okay. With that next item up is Item 6, public hearing proposed
updates to Title 1 , Chapter 7, Section 8, of Meridian City Code regarding City Council
Member compensation. Open this public hearing with staff comments.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 29 of 41
Nary: Yes. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, so we -- again, as the presentation was
last week, former Council Member Hoaglun is here as well if you have questions from
the committee. This is a recommendation from your citizens committee to both
recommend an increase to the City Council over the next two years and also in that --
and I appreciate the Councils have taken a look at this and giving us some feedback,
some of the information in the transition and trying to get this on for this week a couple
things got missed, but we have corrected it. The one that is in the packet for your
approval tonight -- or can be delayed if you wish -- is reflective of what was presented
last week, which is an increase to the Council for both next calendar year in '26, as well
as another increase in '27 and, then, a condition that after those two years, then, the
Council increases would align with the city's general employee compensation increases,
if any, that are provided, would be the same amount as those would be going forward.
The recommendation is not in this, but the ordinance still would be in place that allows
the committee to reconvene each election cycle to evaluate those to a market analysis
and bring back any other suggestions, if any, to you, but -- so, that wouldn't change, but
this would be a two year change in compensation for Council Members, as well as an
ongoing method that's already, then, going to be in ordinance to allow for increases
without any other additional changes.
Simison: Thank you, Bill. Council, any questions for staff?
Whitlock: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Whitlock.
Whitlock: Bill, thanks for the explanation and if Mr. Hoaglun is still there, again, thanks
for the presentation last week. My microphone wasn't quite working, so I didn't get to
express my full appreciation then, so I will do it now. Just a question, Bill, in terms of
the ordinance which has dollar amounts fixed in it and, then, Subsection B, which two
years from now allows for an increase commensurate with the city employee pay
increase or COLA. Is there a reason why we couldn't just do Subsection B at this point
or do we have to amend Subsection A and change dollar figures at this point?
Nary: Well, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Whitlock, actually you
can do whatever you wish. The recommendation from the committee was to move the
total compensation for the Council up to those dollar figures and, then, subsequent to
that, then, the increases. So, the desire was to move the -- the value of compensation
for each of those positions up to those numbers and -- and if you recall former Council
Member Perreault was here last week as well -- in the targeting that 20,000 figure is
what they were looking at, but they recognize that getting to that over a two year period
was more palatable and so they want to do that, but, then, after that the secondary was
also, then, to build in that increase that was built into the system that's already in place
for compensation with, again, that adjustment or evaluation every couple years. So,
that was the intent of the committee. Certainly this Council could do whatever you wish.
So, you can certainly make it the --just the -- the percentage increase only and that's it,
but I mean that's certainly your call. If I misstated that certainly Council Member
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 30 of 41
Hoaglun is here as well and he could certainly correct that, but that's what I recall the
discussion was.
Simison: Council, any further questions? Is there anybody from the public who would
like to provide testimony on this item? Seeing one coming forward.
Hoaglun: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Brad Hoaglun. 2470 West Trestle Drive here in
Meridian and I had the pleasure of serving on the committee and just wanted to remind
you of a couple of things. First of all, it's really not about you, it's about the future and
those that come after you and -- and that's one of the things the committee had a good
discussion about. We wanted to have fair and competitive compensation going into the
future. We want people who -- who come after you to be compensated in a way that --
they are not going to get rich. We know you aren't doing it for the money and people in
the future I'm pretty sure aren't going to be doing it for the money, but there is that
aspect that you are taking valuable time and time away from your family. In fact, I think I
characterize it as spousal appreciation pay and that's what happens to that. Council,
will speak to the Council salaries here, because we have a separate one for the Mayor.
But in 2023 the committee had made a recommendation that was turned down. It was
not acted upon. So, 2024 and '25 there was no increases. So, that's why we wanted to
go to 1,500 dollars for this coming year and a following 1 ,500 dollars the next year.
That way we hope we would, then, have the Council move forward with the
recommendation of having the general -- whatever the general employee population
receives that will also be what the Mayor and Council receive and that way we kind of
take the politics out of this. People look at it say, oh, they are just self-serving when
they get to vote for their own pay increase. That's why you have the committee. We
look at it. We looked at all the amount you are receiving since 2000. We looked at
other cities and did that comparison. Now, it's a little hard sometimes, because you look
at Nampa, the third largest city, Meridian is the second largest city and there is a big
difference, but -- in their code they are required two meetings a month. You have four.
Twice as many. So, there are discrepancies like that that we kind of ferreted through
and said, okay, this is why we think you should be paid this amount. So, again, you are
not going to get rich on it. I think I said last time it was 54 dollars per pay period
increase and that's before taxes. So, not a whole heck of a lot. But it's very important.
We also had made the recommendation that if you don't want to go 1 ,500 per -- per
year, at least go 500. There has got to be some increase in there. We need to keep up
-- otherwise you get so far behind the committee after us will come and make -- have to
make a recommendation that's even larger. But we hope by accepting this
recommendation for the next two years and, then, beginning in 2028 that cost of living
increase that employees get would also be received by Council and you just move
forward that way and, then, every two or four years, whatever was decided for that, we
can look at it from a market perspective, just like HR does, does there need to be a
market adjustment. But everything is built in, whatever goes to the general employee
would go to you. So, that's what we did. We hope you agree with that and I stand for
any questions.
Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Thank you, Brad.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 31 of 41
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: Maybe a question for staff. So, I'm looking at the ordinance here. Are we
tonight would be voting on this ordinance, am I understanding correctly is this all
updated with how it was portrayed to you last week with how to draft the ordinance as in
if we accepted it this would be the ordinance and this would be what we would do
tonight?
Nary: Yes, sir.
Taylor: Mr. Mayor, quick follow up. If -- if we had -- if we would like to make some
modifications to this tonight would we -- what would that process be? Would we -- we
just indicate that we want to come back with maybe a slightly change to that? Because
I know we took the recommendations -- the recommendations were drafted in the
ordinance as it was and here it is before us, but we didn't have a very -- much of a
discussion at least about -- if we would like to see any tweaks or changes to that. So,
the process, if I understand it, would be if we wanted to make some changes tonight we
would offer that up, we would vote on it and, then, we would potentially have it redrafted
to come back next week or the following week; is that correct?
Nary: Yes. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Taylor, if -- if -- that's
exactly correct. The direction was bring forward what we have proposed. If the Council
does want to make changes we can, then, bring it back to a subsequent meeting. If the
desire is to bring it back next week, because you are going to be comfortable with those
changes, that's fine. Next week we weren't intending to have another public hearing,
but you certainly can. Or we can bring it back on the 12th of August for a public
hearing. We do need to have some final action by -- and, again, I apologize, I -- I think
by at least by the 12th we would like to get that finalized to make sure we meet the
timeline that's required by state code. So, it can be done this week, it can be done next
week, it can be done on the 12th. If you want to make changes you can certainly do
that.
Taylor: Yeah. Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: To make sure that -- I think now would probably be the appropriate time to sort
of have some of the discussion, even though the public hearing is open. Appreciate the
work of the committee and -- there is some things in there that I really like and I want to
support and there is some things I just -- I can't support today for the reason that's pretty
obvious, which is if we are considering a -- asking the -- for a public levy increase,
have a hard time asking for an increase. Though I do support the idea of tying future
decisions to a percentage increase with the employees. I think that -- to me that makes
a lot of sense and I agree it also makes sense to keep market adjustment discussion in
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 32 of 41
there as we would deem appropriate. So, you know, I don't want to bury the lead as it
were. I -- I can't say -- I wouldn't support this tonight, but I would -- what I would like to
see is -- is essentially that we adopt the second half of the -- the ordinance where we --
actually starting next year we would start tying our salary increases to the percentage
increase of that. But I'm not in favor tonight of the increase in salary, just because we
are in a unique situation this year and I would -- I would make the argument -- when
was the last time we had a permanent public levy that we were potentially presenting to
the -- the city to vote on and approve? To me that's what qualifies extraordinary
circumstances by which I don't think it's appropriate. I always have considered budget
documents and -- and for of the budget process as a laying out our priorities to the
citizens and to me it's a confusing argument to say we are going to take us an increase
in pay and we are going to ask for more money from you for the levy. Again I'm not
trying to be difficult, I'm not trying to be a naysayer, I'm trying to be productive in the
discussion. So, I just wanted to kind of state that's where I am at this point. I could
support something that was only the second-half of the ordinance, but not the entirety
without some modification.
Simison: So, I know my comments are going to fall in deaf ears, because no one likes
to have a conversation and just like I won't speak up when you are on the next item, but
I'm going to challenge Council to say, you know, part of the -- the conversation that I
have had about the levy, you know, as well as the SAFER grant, I said I wouldn't let it
impact our current operations and our current needs. These -- to me these are not
competing issues. You know, the levy's been put forward and to say if you would like us
to retain these additional firefighters, if you would like to pay your police more, if you
would like to do prosecution ourselves, this is how we can go about doing that. But to
me -- and maybe you can make your own arguments about whether or not that rings
true, but this is no different than the other thing that went through our budget process.
We want competitive salaries for all of our employees. We did not back away from any
changes to our employee compensation this year because of the levy conversation. If
there was a market adjustment that was necessary, if there was a step plan that was
going to be made, if there was a cost of living increase that was going to be done, we
did all that and that's all included into our -- into our budget. So, I know you feel like you
-- you may feel like it's being hypocritical in this -- in the context, but I think it actually --
you know, what is hypocritical is we will call it the Council opposition oppression vote to
say no to increase wages, so that no one wants the job, because you don't get -- you
don't get compensated for this to the level that's necessary, but I know it's a tough
conversation. It's a tough vote no matter. It's a tough conversation. But at least I want
to be the one to say some things, because I -- I think, you know, you can take it, you
cannot, you can vote however you -- you want, but my viewpoint on the levy is we would
not impact our current operational components and this is the recommendation and I'm
not going to say because they got together and gave their time to give their
recommendations that you should have to do it, but if you are not going to do it I would
say let's get rid of this code. Let's no longer go to a committee that's going to evaluate
and make recommendations if it's really something that's not going to be what's going to
make that driving factor or take it out of your hands and let other people make that
decision throughout -- let me make the decision for you. I'm -- I'm serious. You know,
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 33 of 41
it's like there is other ways to do this, because it's never comfortable to have this
conversation about your own salaries. I get it one hundred percent and it's not easy in
that context. So, I'm going to stop right there and --
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: It didn't fall on deaf ears. It was well received. I just cordially disagree.
Simison: Correct.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Little Roberts.
Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor and Council, this is definitely something I go back and forth
on, because as Brad pointed out, we -- we are the ones making the decision and so the
first thing we do is take -- how do we feel about it in consideration and it's tough for me
to say raise my salary for whatever reason, because I'm here because I love the city,
but I also know that I have talked to so many people that possibly could be up here
someday and they think, well, that's kind of not in my wheelhouse because it really isn't
paid, especially if they are younger, in their 30s or 40s are like that doesn't match what
I'm even remotely considering as a part-time salary, because we do end up working
more hours than we anticipate and to me there is a lot of things to look at and I don't
think we could have had a better committee. I mean our committee was made up of
people that have sat in these chairs and wrestled with the decision -- two of our
esteemed former colleagues, as well as people that are very versed on what we do,
how we do it, how much time goes in it and, then, my HR side of me says we kind of
missed out on not keeping up with salaries every single year. So -- so I think in the long
run I am supportive of this. It's got so many angles and I don't believe that it's tied in
with the levy. I think we have got to consider everything. But I think that your words
definitely rang true for me that those are two completely different issues. So, thank you.
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Say a lot of words I think I said last time we talked about this. We voted on
this a couple years ago. I was brand new on Council and at the time I was like very
very uncomfortable voting on my own pay increase. I was brand new to Council and I
was still discovering just how much time it took for my week. Not just to do this job, but
to do it right, to put the homework in, to spend the time looking through everything. So,
after voting no two years ago and getting to this point now I realize what we are doing is
we are digging a hole and we can keep digging that hole. We are not doing ourselves a
favor. We are not doing future councils a favor. But I think I have to go back to the
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 34 of 41
bottom line that was said is we are not doing this for us. This isn't -- this isn't in front of
us for us, this is in front of us for city council's now, future -- everyone to look at so they
are adequately compensated for the work they do to do the job and it's -- it's a tough
one. I don't -- I don't like voting on something for myself. I made that quite apparent
two years ago. I kind of get it now and it helps that there were former council members
on that committee that can look you in the eye and sit there and they are not getting
compensated for it now and they are looking right at me saying you need to do this and
this is why and they spent their time up here sitting on this dais making decisions for the
city and doing the work and based on those conversations I think it's the right thing to do
to support it and I would move forward. I think we can always find an excuse for not
supporting this. You can always find it. So, I will support it this year going forward.
Simison: And maybe just piggyback off one thing that you said. I often say this to other
people about -- said the reason Meridian is success -- successful in what we have in the
Public Safety Training Center and our amazing parks and our fire and things is because
Council at one point in time had made a very tough decision to implement impact fees.
Quite frankly, this Council, the job that you have to do, is made so much easier,
because some council 20 years ago made some very tough decisions to put additional
costs on the back of growth and development that allows this Council to be successful.
Myself included. This is maybe one of those times where you are especially setting
something up -- catching up and a path moving forward for the long run for those next
councils as well at this point in time. But I -- I just think it's -- sometimes these are
things that doesn't feel right, doesn't feel comfortable, but I think it's important to
consider, so --
Whitlock: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Whitlock.
Whitlock: Started the evening on the fence on this issue and, unfortunately, it was a
picket fence, so I'm going to have to figure out which side I want to fall on and part of
me wants to fall where Councilman Taylor is, because I agree with that and this is not in
conflict with what we may or may not decide next week, but it is juxtaposed to what we
may or may not decide next week with the public safety levy. So, I have to look at the
full picture of that and yet the other side of the fence I totally agree with what you just
said. We need to make some decisions about the future and, frankly, if the public safety
levy fails, somebody's going to be making some really hard decisions on this Council
and they ought to be compensated for making those tough decisions. If the public levy
-- public safety levy passes, then, we are able to make that a priority for our city as we
move forward and deliver on what the citizens say that they want. So, again, I'm -- I'm
-- I'm trying to figure out which side of the fence I'm going to fall onto, because this
picket fence is not a comfortable ride right now. I would like to hear the rest of the
discussion, but I -- I appreciate the -- the counsel from you, Mayor. I appreciate the
concerns from Councilman Taylor. I agree with both sides of that. So, if anybody else
can help me get off the fence I would appreciate it.
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 35 of 41
Simison: Your cleanup hitter is coming in, Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I don't know if this helps Council Member Whitlock one way or
another. I think this is the fifth time that I have been a part of one of these and I will be
honest, when I very first got on Council I was a no unless proven otherwise. Just -- I
showed up, my mind was made up, I was not going to vote to support a salary increase
and at the time, quite frankly, I think because of these committees, I have tried to be
much more open minded. I have even voted to support a salary increase, I believe,
once in my time. So, I'm not always opposed and I -- and Mayor, I -- and, Mr. Nary,
want to commend you. I think this is the best committee we have ever put together
since I have been on Council and like my good colleague Council Member Whitlock, I --
I have swayed back and forth and, Council Member Little Roberts, you hit the nail on
the head, I don't -- I don't think that -- that a salary increase for the Council is tied to a
levy, but I also don't think that we can make those decisions in a vacuum. I think we
have to look at the real world implications and former Council Member Hoaglun I think,
you know, put it best, it's not about us, it is about -- got to take the person out of it and,
Council Member Little Roberts, you talk a lot about, you know, positions, not people,
and that has sat in the back of my head a lot. It's not about Council Member Cavener or
Council Member Taylor, it's about future council members who will send these seats and
so I have -- I have wrestled with that. The part that I have landed for me is -- and you
have heard me ask about this at various budgets and as we have talked about
compensation for our employees. I want our employees to be paid a fair and equitable
wage. I don't want to compare it necessarily to this city or that city. We want to be
selective. I want to make sure their employees receive a fair and equitable wage.
Likewise, I want to make sure that our City Council receives a fair and equitable
compensation. Our Mayor receives a fair and equitable compensation, knowing that we
have never met -- I have never met anybody that's ran or sat up here that said because
we have increased our wage 1 ,500 dollars, that was the ticket to get me to run or
because you didn't take an increase I decided I wasn't going to run. I don't think that
our voters want candidates that are focused on compensation. I do agree with Council
Member Hoaglun, my wife has had a few make-up dinners purchased probably with my
City Council salary and flowers for saying, hey, I told you to be home at 8:00 and didn't
get home until 11:30, that happens. But are we paid a fair and equitable wage for what
we do and I think the answer is yes and so I -- I likely won't be in support of an increase
this year, not because I don't think the -- the committee makes sense and not because I
don't think it's deserved. Quite frankly, all of you that are up here deserve to be paid a
hundred times more than what you are paying, because you care about this community
and the time that you put in. It's not about that. It is are we receiving a fair and
equitable amount of compensation for the job that our community asks of us? I think
right now the answer is yes.
Simison: The public hearing is still open.
Cavener: Mr. Mayor, while I don't see anybody here and I have to say I -- I'm going to
convey a little bit of disappointment. Our state legislature took up compensation
increases. There was lots of chatter and lots of people had strong opinions and one of
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 36 of 41
our neighbor cities took up compensation increases. It was a packed, you know, council
chambers. We don't have anybody here, despite I think this being promoted very well.
Used to have a council member who sat right over here and says if -- if nobody's here
that must mean everybody's in agreement. I don't necessarily share that same opinion,
but I'm disappointed that there is nobody here in our community, outside of a good
committee member, to provide any testimony on this one way or another. But that said,
Mr. Mayor, I'm happy to make a motion that we close the public hearing on proposed
updates to Title 1 , Chapter 7, Section 9, the Meridian City Code, regarding City Council
compensation.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any
discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it
and the public hearing is closed.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
Simison: So, Council, I don't know if you want to continue discussion before we get to
the ordinance to know whether or not we are going to take up the ordinance or not. Any
further -- or just go to the ordinance when we get there and see what happens? Okay.
Right. I think that's what we will do.
7. Public Hearing: Proposed updates to Title 1, Chapter 6, Section 5, of
Meridian City Code regarding Mayor's Compensation
Simison: So, with that we will go to Item 7, which is a public hearing proposed updates
to Title 1, Chapter 6, Section 5 of Meridian City Code regarding mayor's compensation.
Turn this over to Mr. Nary.
Nary: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Again, as the prior one, we -- our
citizens committee did meet and made these recommendations for these increases for
the Mayor's compensation. Basically very similar conversation, very similar discussion.
Again, it was looking at trying to be consistent, trying to move the wages up periodically
as necessary. That's a very common compensation method is to do that to avoid these
discussions where you have to make drastic increases. There was a desire by the
committee to move this number up to what they felt was a more reasonable and
equitable approach for compensation for the mayor. Again, the committee is currently
configured that it meets every couple years during an election cycle, so the next time it's
scheduled to meet again is in two years before the actual term of the Mayor is over
before the next Mayor term would begin. But this is trying to, again, keep it up and
move it along. Again, there have been -- and they looked at a number of past ones over
the last 25 years of -- the Mayor has increased more incrementally more often than the
Council. There have been occasions where they have not. But here, again, was the
same idea of not looking at the individuals, not looking at the individual person in the
job, but the job itself and what the expectation the committee felt as a community, as the
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 37 of 41
committee members, as their expectation of what they believe, as well as what they
think the public is looking for and what they think is a fair compensation. So, that was
where those numbers came from. That's what the intent was was to move that along.
And, then, also same thing, to put this in future opportunity for those to increase on a
regular basis annually along with that periodic market adjustment with the election
cycle. So, that was the intent for this one as well.
Simison: Thank you, Mr. Nary. Council, any questions for staff? Would the public like
to come up and provide any testimony on this? Or committee member?
Hoaglun: Yes, I would, Mr. Mayor. Brad Hoaglun. 2470 West Trestle Drive, Meridian.
And that's one thing about the committee -- all residents and they want to be good
stewards of tax dollars. I mean that's really what we want and when it came to the
Mayor's salary the recommendation was 3,500 dollar increase of 2026 and 3,500 dollars
for 2027. And, again, also, then, tying into for -- starting in 2028 the -- the general
employee increases as well. One of the things about the salary now for the Mayor, he is
not paid what a CEO of an organization this size, with a budget of this magnitude, would
be paid. They are much higher. And -- and, of course, bonuses and other things. You
are in government work you don't get bonuses. That's just the way it works. That's fine.
And, again, it's -- it's not about this Mayor, it's about that position and -- and the future of
that position. I -- I do know having been in private business and -- and private entity
that the level that's currently at it's not even a vice -- vice-president level. It's not even
at a director level. There are people who are directors in organizations that make far
more than this. So, we thought it was imperative that we increase that a bit and still not
even going to make 150,000. It would be after 2027 it would at 146,387. So, with the
direct reports that he has, the budget he manages, the day-to-day affairs, we thought it's
the best we can do at this time, but, then, if we tie it in moving forward that would be
helpful for whoever is in that position in the future, so -- any questions happy to answer.
Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Is there anybody else who has been
hanging out all night that wants to come forward and talk about this item?
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: If there is anything I try to be consistent, so I don't need to repeat what I said
before, because my position is consistent, but that said I will take the opportunity, as
have learned about -- over the last year and a half of being on Council, the
responsibilities that the Mayor's seat has. It's significant. It is a large organization. It
does require a lot of time and I -- I absolutely agree with you, the notion that we want
competent people to be interested in this role, not just now, but in the future as the city
grows. There is a lot of challenges. You do have to face a lot of difficult decisions,
some of us thrusting it upon you, some of your own making, but it is a -- it is a
challenge.
Simison: Come on. My own making? What's up with that?
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 38 of 41
Taylor: And I recognize that.
Simison: I'm kidding.
Taylor: I will compliment you. I think that the city is being run well and it -- my position
on this issue isn't reflective of your job performances, as much as being consistent with
what I have said before about how we present these things to our constituency.
Simison: You could have just closed the public hearing, too. Sorry. I'm having a good
night tonight. I don't know why. Well, a lot of iced tea today. Any -- any further
comments or a motion to close the public hearing?
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Move we close the public hearing on proposed updates to Title 1 , Chapter 7,
Section 5 of the Meridian City Code regarding Mayor's compensation.
Overton: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any
discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it.
The public hearing is closed.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
ORDINANCES [Action Item]
8. Ordinance No. 25-2092, updates to Title 4, Chapter 1, Meridian City
Code per Idaho Code section 50-344(2): Amending Meridian City
Code section 4-1-3 to add definitions of "household waste" and
"temporary project"; amending Meridian City Code section 4-1-4,
regarding compulsory use of solid waste collection franchisee's
services; amending Meridian City Code section 4-1-8, regarding
collection of solid waste and recyclable materials, specifically
temporary project service and on-call service; amending Meridian
City Code section 4-1-10(G), adding an exception to compulsory use
of franchisee for temporary project solid waste collection; repealing
conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date.
Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to Item 8, which is Ordinance No. 25-2092.
Ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title.
Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Ordinance No. 25-2092, updates to Title 4, Chapter 1,
Meridian City Code, per Idaho Code Section 50-344(2): Amending Meridian City Code
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 39 of 41
Section 4-1-3 to add definitions of "household waste" and "temporary project"; amending
Meridian City Code Section 4-1-4, regarding compulsory use of solid waste collection
franchisee's services; amending Meridian City Code Section 4-1-8, regarding collection
of solid waste and recyclable materials, specifically temporary project service and on-
call service; amending Meridian City Code Section 4-1-10(g), adding an exception to
compulsory use of franchisee for temporary project solid waste collection; repealing
conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date.
Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there
anybody that would like it read in this entirety? If not, do I have a motion?
Taylor: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Taylor.
Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2092.
Cavener: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2092. Is their
discussion? If not, clerk call the roll.
Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea;
Whitlock, yea.
Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
9. Ordinance No. 25-2093: An Ordinance Amending Title 1, Chapter 7,
Section 9 of the Meridian City Code, Regarding City
Councilmembers' Compensation; Providing a Savings Clause; and
Providing an Effective Date
Simison: Next item up is Ordinance No. 25-2093. Ask the clerk to read this ordinance
by title.
Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. An Ordinance Amending Title 1, Chapter 7, Section 9 of
the Meridian City Code, regarding City Councilmembers' Compensation; providing a
savings clause; and providing an effective date.
Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there
anybody who would like it read in its entirety? If not, do I have a motion?
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 40 of 41
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2093.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2093. Is there
discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll.
Roll Call: Cavener, nay; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, nay;
Whitlock, nay.
Simison: Three no's. Two ayes. Motion fails.
MOTION FAILED: THREE NAY. TWO AYES. ONE ABSENT.
10. Ordinance No. 25-2094: An Ordinance Amending Title 1, Chapter 6,
Section 5 of the Meridian City Code Regarding Mayor's
Compensation; Providing a Savings Clause; and Providing an
Effective Date
Simison: With that we will move on to Ordinance No. 25-2094. Is there discussion -- or
ask the clerk to read this ordinance by title?
Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. An Ordinance amending Title 1, Chapter 6, Section 5 of
the Meridian City Code regarding Mayor's compensation; providing a savings clause;
and providing an effective date.
Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there
anybody that would like it read in its entirety? If not, do I have a motion?
Overton: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Overton.
Overton: Move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2094.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2094. Is there
discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll.
Roll Call: Cavener, nay; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, nay;
Whitlock, yea.
Simison: Three ayes, two nays, and the motion is agreed to..
Meridian City Council
July 22,2025
Page 41 of 41
MOTION CARRIED: THREE AYES. TWO NAYS. ONE ABSENT.
FUTURE MEETING TOPICS
Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics?
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Just a good reminder to our team, special meeting next Tuesday. Make sure
it's on your calendar. We will be talking all things public safety levy. So, look forward to
seeing you all next week.
Simison: All right. With that is there a motion?
Cavener: Mr. Mayor?
Simison: Councilman Cavener.
Cavener: Move we adjourn the meeting.
Little Roberts: Second.
Simison: Motion and second to adjourn the meeting. All in favor signify by saying aye.
Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned.
MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:56 P.M.
(AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS)
8 / 12 25
MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED
ATTEST:
CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK