Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCreekside Arbour CUP 02-040 December 16. 2002 MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING MEETING CUP 02-040 December 19. 2002 APPLICANT Bill and Lucy Leavell ITEM NO. 12 REQUEST Public Hearing - Request for a Conditional Use Permit for apartment units on 1.99 acres in a proposed R-4Q zone for proposed Creekside Arbour II - 1425 Northeast 5th Street CITY CLERK: CITY ENGINEER: CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY CITY POLICE DEPT: CITY FIRE DEPT: CITY BUILDING DEPT: CITY WATER DEPT: CITY SEWER DEPT: SANITARY SERVICE: MERIDIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: MERIDIAN POST OFFICE: ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT: CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH: NAMPA MERIDIAN IRRIGATION: IDAHO POWER: US WEST: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS: OTHER: See attached letter from Loren D. Ross Contacled:-J\~~ \wJJ1/ Date: 11vUrot- Phone:?J..~ /Ms Materials presented at public meetings shall became propelfy of the City of Meridian. AGENCY COMMENTS See attached Staff Comments See attached Comments "Ok per Meridian Water" "No Commenr 1/-tWf/I/;f1?)A'UX ArfrDfJa1* C/G See attached Comments See attached Comments See attached Comments See attached Comments See attached Comments MAYOR Robert D. Corrie HUB OF TREASURE VALLEY A Good Place to Live C[TY COUNCIL MEMBERS TammydeW~ Keith Bird Cherie McCandless William L.M. Nary CITY OF MERIDIAN 33 EAST IDAHO MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 (208) 888-4433. FA."\: (208) 887-4813 City Clerk Office Fox (208) 888-4218 MEMORANDUM: To: Planning & Zoning Commission, Mayor and City Council Bruce Freckleton, Senior Engineering Tech ~ Dave McKinnon, Planner II NA . CREEKSIDE ARBOUR IT From: Re: LEGAL DEPARTMENT (208) 288.2499 . Fax 288.2501 PUBLIC WORKS BI.HLDlNG DEPARTMENT (208) 898.5500' Fax 887.[297 PLA.,'NING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT (208) 884-5533' FA.,888-6854 November 25, 2002 RECEIVED DEe I 3 2\J!J:l City Of Merim.an .City Clerk Office . Request for a Rezone of 1.99 Acres of Land from R-8 (Medium Density Residential District) to R-40 (High Density Residential District) Zoning, by Bill and Lucy Leavell (File No. RZ-02-008). · Request for Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Forty-Eight (48) Apartments on 1.99 acres of Land, Located in a Proposed R-40 Zone, by Bill and Lucy Leavell (File No. CUP-02-040). We have reviewed the above-referenced submittal and offer the following comments, as conditions of the applicant. These conditions shall be considered in full, unless expressly modified or deleted by motion of the Meridian City Council: APPLICATION SUMMARY & BACKGROUND The applicants, Bill and Lucy Leavell, have requested the rezone of a rectangular piece of property, located at 1425 N.E. Fifth Street (just north of the existing Creekside Arbour Apartment Complex, zoned R-1S), from an R-8 zone to an R-40 zoning classification. The adopted Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map depicts the subject property as "High Density Residential". In conjunction with the applicant's rezone request is a request for conditional use permit to place forty-eight apartments on the subject property. The proposed apartment complex consists of six (6) individual, two-story apartment buildings, with eight (8) apartments in each building. There are 48 dwelling units on 1.99 acres, with an approximate density of 24 units per acre. It appears that the legal description submitted with the application is accurate and meets the requirements of the City of Meridian and State Tax Commission. . LOCATION & SURROUNDING USES The subject property is located approximately 1/3 of a mile east of Meridian Road on the south side ofFairview Avenue. R.Z-02.o0, CreabIde Arbour.RZ.CUP Mayor and Council November 5, 2002 Page 2 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES North: Commercial complex, zoned CoG. South: Apartment complex, zoned R-15. East: Vacant commercial land, zoned CoG. West: A manufactured home community, zoned R-8. OWNERS OF RECORD The applicants are the owners of record and they have consented to the submission of this application. STANDARDS FOR ZONING AMENDMENT The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed zoning amendment in terms of the following standards and shaJl fwd adequate evidence answering the. following questions about tbe proposed zoning amendment (11-15- 11): A. Will tbe new zoning be barmonious with and in accordance with tbe Comprehensive Plan and, if not, bas there been an application for a Comprebensive plan amendment; Staff finds that the adopted Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map delineates the subject property as "High Density Residential". The requested R-40 zoning is harmonious with the "High Density Residential" designation and is in accordance with the overall goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. "High Density" is described in the Comprehensive Plan as allowing multiple family dwellings containing over eight (8) dwelling units per acre (page 95). B. Is the area included in the zoning amendment intended to be re-zoned in the future; Staff fmds that the proposed zoning amendment complies with the intended zone(s) supported by the Future Land Use Map. Staff does not anticipate that the property will be rezoned in the future. C. Is the area included in tbe zoning amendment intended to be developed in tbe fashion that would he allowed under tbe new zoning; Staff finds that the applicant has submitted detailed development plans for the subject property; and that if the property is developed in accordance with the requested Conditional Use Permit the new apartment complex would be allowed under the new R- 40 zoning designation. D. Has there heen a change in the area or adjacent areas which may dictate that the area sbould be rezoned; RZ-02-4)()j Cn!cbidcArbour.Rl.CUP Mayor and Council November 5,2002 Page 3 The recent adoption of the Comprehensive Plan changed the land use designation of the property from "Existing Urban" to "High Density Residential" on the City's Future Land Use Map. Furthermore this is being developed as part of an existing apartment complex to the south. E. Will the proposed uses be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended cbaracter of the general vicinity and tbat such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that all development on the subject property will be in harmony the existing (high density residential) and intended (high density residential) character of the area. The design and the construction of the proposed apartment complex are very similar to the existing apartments in the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of the area. F. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Staff finds that the re-zone to R-40 should not be disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. Specific uses allowed (either permitted uses or conditional uses) within the R-40 zone may be disturbing to future or existing neighbors; however each development will be required to comply with the approval requirements of the MCC. The Commission and Council should carefully consider all public testimony, oral and written, before making this finding. G. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as higbways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional use shall be able to provide adequately any sucb service; Staff finds that the proposed uses will be adequately served by all essential public services and facilities noted above. H. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to tbe economic welfare of the community; Staff finds that the requested uses will not create excessive additional requirements at public costs for public facilities and services. Additionally, staff finds that the proposed rezone would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. I. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; RZ-G2-oas CteebWe AJbour.RZ.CUP Mayor and Council November 5,2002 Page 4 Staff finds that the proposed R-40 zoning designation of the property does not inherently allow uses that will generate activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions that are detrimental to the general welfare of the community. J. Will have vehicular approacbes to tbe property wbicb sbaIl be so designed as not to create an interference witb traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the proposed R-40 zoning will not interfere with general traffic patterns on any public streets. The lot does not have direct lot access to Fairview Avenue; however a shared access to Fairview Avenue (to the north of the subject property) has been approved of by ACHD as part ofan earlier apartment development proposal. K. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic feature of major importance. Staff does not find that any natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by approval of this rezone. L. Is tbe proposed zooing amendment in the best interest of the City; Staff finds that the zoning amendment would be in the best interest of the City by allowing a property owner to make improvements to the property that would otherwise not be allowed without the zoning amendment. CONDmONSOFAPPRQVAL I. Development of the property shall be in conformance with the Meridian City Code and the conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit File No. CUP-02-040. STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES The Commission and Council shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed conditional use in terms of the following and may approve a conditional use permit if they shall find evidence presented at the hearing(s) is adequate to establish (11-17-3): A. That tbe site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and all yards, open spaces, parking, Iandseaping and other features as may be required by this ordinance; Staff finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the required parking (96required spaces, 100 provided), and the required landscaping, open space and other development features required of an "Apartment" use by this ordinance. Some minor changes will need to be made to bring the proposed use into compliance with the MCC, however the site is large enough to accommodate the required changes. B. That the proposed use and development plan will be harmonious witb the Meridian RZ-OO-D05 ~ Atbour.RZ.CUP Mayor and Council November 5,2002 Page 5 Comprehensive Plan and in accordance with the requirements of this Ordinance; The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the property as "High Density Residential". Staff finds that the requested apartment complex use is a "Conditional Use" according to MCC 11-8-1, signirying that, if approved by the City Council, the use will be harmony with the Meridian Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. C. That the design, construction, operation, and maintenance wiD be compatible witb other nses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use wiD not adversely change the essential character of the same area; Staff finds that the proposed development will not change the existing or intended character of the general vicinity (currently a mix of medium and high density residential and commercial uses). D. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, wiD not adversely affect other property in the vicinity; The Commission and Council should rely upon public testimony to determine if the development will adversely affect the other property in the vicinity. Staff does not anticipate any adverse effect on nearby properties. E. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, street, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water, sewer or that the person responsible for the establishment of proposed conditional nse shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Staff finds that the proposed development will be adequately served by the essential public facilities and services listed above. F. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the commnnity; Staff finds that the proposed use would not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community, nor would it create the need for any new facilities or services to be paid for by the public. G. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; R2Al2-(J(Jj Creebidt: Axboor.RZ.CUP Mayor and Council November 5, 2002 Page 6 Staff finds that no excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors will result from the proposed use. H. That the proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public streets; Staff finds that the proposed use will not create significant interference with any traffic on the surrounding public streets. L That the proposed use will not resuk in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Staff finds that no natural or scenic feature will be lost, damaged or destroyed by issuance ofthis conditional use. SITE SPECIFIC REOUlREMENTS 1. Landscaping shall be installed as submitted with the following corrections/changes: a. Replace the rock in the perimeter planter beds with bark or other organic material as required by the Landscape Ordinance. b. Add a minimum 50 square foot planter, with a 2" caliper tree, in between the three trash enclosures and the sidewalks to provide a landscaping break within the linearly arraigned apartment parking. 2. All exterior lighting, whether attached to the building or located within the parking lot, shall be down-shielded or otherwise altered so that the light does not spill over onto adjacent properties or right-of-way. All parking lot lighting shall be in accordance with Ordinance 11-13-4C. 3. All signage shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 11-14 of the City Zoning and Development Ordinance. All signage is subject to design review and shall require separate permits. Temporary or portable signs shall be prohibited, and shall be removed upon 3 days notice to the applicant. 4. All construction and site improvements shall conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 5. All parking and areas of circulation shall be improved with a hard surface in accordance with MCC l1-13-4.D, and shall be installed and striped in accordance with the submitted site plan, ADA and MCC 11-13-4.F. 6. A drainage plan designed by a State of Idaho licensed architect or engineer is required and shall be submitted to the City Engineer (Ord. 557, 10-1-91) for all off-street parking RZ-02-005 Crcabidc AIbour.R.Z.CUP Mayor and Council November 5, 2002 Page 7 areas. Storm water treatment and disposal must be designed in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality 1997 publication Catalog of Storm Water Best Management Practices for Idaho Cities and Counties and City of Meridian standards and policies. Off"site disposal into a surface water is prohibited unless the jurisdiction which has authority over the receiving stream provides written authorization prior to development plan approval. The applicant is responsible for filing all necessary applications with the Idaho Department of Water Resources regarding Shallow Injection Wells. 7. Trash: The trash enclosure shall be enclosed on at least 3 sides by a solid wall or sight obscuring fence at least four feet in height in accordance with Ordinance 11-12-1C. Coordinate location and construction requirements with Sanitary Services, Inc. 8. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and a Building Permit shall be obtained prior to the start of construction 9. Water and sewer service shall be from extensions of existing mains adjacent to the subject property. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezone and conditional use permit requests with the aforementioned conditions of approval. RZ.-02..oM CrccbideArbour.RZ.CUP .. lVlAYOR ROBERT D.CORRJE COUNCll. MEMBERS Wll.LIAM L.M. NARY KEtTI! BIRD TAMMY DE WEERD CHERlE McCANDLESS RURAL FlRE COMMISSIONERS RICHARD GREENE TERRY LE1GIITON STEVE ELLIOTT ~" /,CITYOF~C" I......./YLtJrldl:;'n~ '\ "A IDAHO Jl ~C'... '.y,..,:~ ....TItIO.~ fW."~-< ,$_~ '19113 MERIDIAN CITY/RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT l;HIEF KENW. BOWERS DEPUTY CHJEF - FIRE PREVENTION JOSEPH Sit V A DEPUTY CHIEF - TRAINlNG BILL JOHNSON 540 East Franklin Road Meridian. ID 83642 (208) 888-1234 Fax (208) 895-0390 ~_"'!:~ ~,---,~-~.._-=---,---,._--~,~~~------,_._---- _"~_-="'__"""_-""""___l"_~~",,,,... __.' _.__,,_,_ .._ ___ ___,_.__.___.._.____._~______,._____.____ ....____n_"'.__.___ December 11, 2002 RECEIVED DEe 1 2 2002 City Of Meridian City Clerk Office TO: Mayor, City Council & Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Joseph Silva, Deputy Chief, Fire Prevention SUBJECT: Creekside Arbour IT-1425 Northeast 5th File- RZ 02-008, CUP 02-040 The following will be the requirements and/or concerns to provide minimum levels of fire protection for the proposed project: 1. That a fire-flow consistent with Appendix ill-A of the Uniform Fire Code be provided to service the entire project. Fire hydrants shall be placed an average of 400' apart. 1997 UFC Appendix ill-A 2. Operational fire hydrants are required before combustible construction begins. UFC 901.4.2 & 901.3 3. Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Water Department. 4. Final approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department submitted thru the Public Works Department. 5. All radii for internal & external roads sha1l be 28' inside and 48' outside radius. 6. The proposed project will have an unknown transient population and will have an unknown impact Meridian Fire Department requests for service. According to a report completed by Fire & Emergency Services Consulting Group in February of 2000 our requests for service are projected to reach 2800 in the year 2005 and 3800 by the year 2010, this is up from 2069 responses in the year 2000. 7. The proposed project lies outside the five-minute response zone goal. Achievement of this goal is subject to budgetary constraints and is intended to enhance the probability of a favorable outcome on a request for Basic Life Support. The budget constraints are typically defined as cllpital outlay for facilities that are located within 1.5 miles from a given location and ~ciep.t operational funds to staff the facilities. A fire station is scheduled. to becofi\8:iperational in the fall of 2003 in this service area. 8. The fire department requests that any future signalization installed as the result of the development of this project are equipped with Opticom Sensors to ensure a safe and efficient response by fire and emergency medical service vehicles. This cost of this installation is to be borne by the developer 9. All buildings containing 6 or more units will be required to be fire sprinklered. DEC-6-2002 02:ISF FROM:Sanitar. // Services, I 208-888-5052 .~~..: ~~t ~ g /' CITY 0_ ~e1~"1. L/YLerzdian'-",; ~ InAHO ~ TD:Meridian Clerk F:"V5 I, f'M .'\ L OE"I\ K'rMENT ~~O~l1:i~.:.lQ9. F:l:': l1lS.1501 I',\RKS JL RECRE....TION (JOg :188.3571) . F:u g9~.~.50( ruOl.lC wnRKS (:!M) K()S.'.i~Of) .FJl.X ~;.l7.11t)i '~t,~.;., ,. v I' f' ~UILLlIN(; LlEI'AIUMeNT (~O:Sll!ol:!7.!~1' . "L1~ ::ll:i7.lll)7 I'L.ANNINO ANO lONINli t~OS) g8."S)J,) . F,J.\ ~eFl-(jR;;" T.:i.m l!~rd Wllliom L. M, N3I'Y Cherie McC,:mdltss Keith Bird iran TRANSMITTALS TO AGENCIES FOR COMMENTS ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH THE CITY OF ME~IDlAN To insure thaI your comments and recommendations will be considered by the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission. please submit your comments amI recommendations to Meridian City Clerl<'s Office Al1n: Will Berg. City Clerk, by: December 12. 2002 Transmittal Date: October 25, 2002 Hearing Date: December 19, 2002 File No.: CUP 02-040 Request: Conditional Use Permit for apartment units on 1.99 acres in a proposed R-40 20ne for proposed Creekside Arbour II By: Bill and Lucy Leavell Localion 01 Properly or Project: 1425 Northeast 5th Street Meridian School District (No FP) Meridian Post Office (FPIPP ..Iy) Ada County Highway District Community Planning Assoc. Central District Heatth Nampa Meridian Irrig. District Settlers Irrigalion District Idaho Power Co. (FPIPPOttIy) U.S. West (FPIPP only) Intermountain Gas (FPIPP only) Bureau of Reclamation {FPIPP only} Idaho Transportation Department (No FP) Ada County (A.....tIon only) David Zaremba. P/Z (No VAR. VAC. FP) Jeny Centers. PIZ (No VAR. VAC. FP) Leslie Mathes, P/Z (No VAR. VAC, FP) Michael Rohm. PIZ (No VAR, VAC. FP) Keith Borup. P/Z (No VAR. VAC. FP) Robert Corrie, Mayor Bill Nary. C/C Tammy deWeerd, C1C Keith Bird. CIC Cherie McCandless. C/C Waler Department Sewer Depamnent Sanitary SalVlee (No VAR. VAC. FP) Building Department Your Concise Remarl<s: Fire Oepal1menl 4c... 0.I.&:w1!.. CD.....A.L1llj> v:J1 ~A""" 1"0 ..l...Nl:''-L- Police Department t.. v 2 1'11..>>",..-1 .o.....cn-..._ P/.JE-E..L . .tuf...."... .. ":1>'&5 I to,",:> City-Attorney .A~. tJ.J~LL ~~. .3yJ (eLwoAuJ"JI, .s.'2..."/~~D -'v p/od"" CJty Engineer ';>1 &A (l, D.'. Q..~~ .4.!!1 ~t.:t.J.I _ iO.J A.,-,-.!':.c I So ...1.1.1I" P"I'...II~S.b. City Planner -a..... (dU..c.b~ $ . .:it .L.. . Parks Department I, ~ I I I ( v I RECEIVED DEe 0 6 2002 f , I r I f I I ._4 ~ City Of Meridian 33 EAST IDAHO. MERIDIAN. IDAHO 83642 City Clerk Office (208) 888.4>133 . Fa< (208) 887-481) . Cuy Clerk Olliee """ (208) 888-4218 . Human Resource, F" (208) 288.1193 DEC 06 '02 13:33 208-888-5052 PAGE. 04 SUPERINTENDENT Christine H. Donnell October 29, 2002 RECEl.VED NOV 0 1 2002 CITY OF MERIDIAN Joint School DistricmoZ~~G 911 Meridian Street. Meridian, Idaho 83642. (208) 888-6701 . Fax (208) 888.6700 RECEIVED NO\' 1 5 2002 C~ty Of Meridian CIty Clerk Office City of Meridian 33 East Idaho Meridian, Idaho 83642 Dear Planners: The Meridian School District has experienced phenomenal student growth the last ten years. The high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools throughout the district are operating over capacity. Approval of Creekside Arbour II Subdivision will have a significant impact on school enrolhnents at Meridian Elementary. Meridian Middle. and Meridian High School. We can predict that these homes, when completed, will house twelve (12) elementary aged children, eight (8) middle school aged children, and eight (8) senior high aged students. Additional students will further compound the current overcrowded situation. Residents cannot be assured of attending the neighborhood school, as it may be necessary to bus students to other schools across the district. School capacity is addressed in Idaho Code 67-6508. The Meridian School District is currently operating beyond capacity. Future development will continue to have an impact on the district's capacity. If you have any questions, please contact me at 888-6701. Sincerely, ~~ Supervisor of Facilities and Construction , .J~-1Io A.4'.~?\....... .., AC~'- Ada County Highway District David E. Wynkoop, President Dave Bivens, 1 st Vice President Judy Peavey-Derr, 2nd Vice President Susan S. Eastlake, Commissioner Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner 318 East 37th Street Garden City ID 83714.6499 Phone (208) 387-6100 FAX (208) 387.6391 E-mail: tellus@ACHD.ada.id.us November 6, 2002 RECEIVED NOV 13 2002 TO: Billy & Lucy Leavell 2720 S. Ariel Lane Meridian, ID 83542 City of Meridian City Clerk Office SUBJECT: MCUP02-040 Apartment Units 1425 N.E. 5th StreetlFairview The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) staff has received and reviewed the application and site plan for the item referenced above and is submitting this no review letter in response to the lead agency's request for comment. Based on the submitted information, it has been determined that the proposed development will generate less than 10 additional vehicle trips per day (VTD); or improvements exist adjacent to the site and ACHD has no site improvement requirements attributable to this application. ACHD policy states that no site related improvements will be required for developments generating less than 10 additional VTD. If the site plan or use changes in such a manner that more than 10 additional vehicle trips per day are generated, then ACHD will review the site plan and may issue requirements based on the ACHD Policy Manual. This development is estimated to generate 318 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. As of July 1999 the traffic count on Fairview Avenue east of 1st Street (Main Street) was 30,734 vehicle trips per day. ACHD policy requires that before any improvements of any kind are constructed or installed within the public right-of-way, a permit or license agreement permitting the improvements must be obtained. All future design plans and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived in writing by the District. Meet District drainage requirements per section 8000 of the ACHD Development Policy Manual. Contact District staff at 387-6170 for details. Please contact the office for determination of possible road impact fees, prior to obtaining a building permit. These fees are collected in accordance with Ordinance #195, the Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6170. ir~er1~ ~ ~~~- Development Analyst Planning & Development Cc: Planning & Development/Chron/Project File Planning & Development Services City of Meridian Construction Services Larry Knopp, 355 S. Third Street, Boise, ID 83702 Creekside Arbour II, LLC, 1425 N.E. Fifth Street, Meridian ID 83642 " rn ~ =1 ~ . 0 0 p) II - . or'" ~ UJ :e ~ ... Gl ~ S ~ W Q - ~ ~ 0 ~\ - ;;: .. > u. UI g G) 13:1W-S agO UJ ~ >- \~ co \.U Q i \ I Q\ o C') -J J \ I ! \ \ g I --------- RECEIVED NOV - 4 2002 ~& City of Meridian SI.Z Clerk.OfficF -,~1~ Z)~ 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651 -4395 FAX # 208.463-0092 1 November 2002 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nampa 466.7861 SHOP: Nampa 466-0663 Larry R. Knopp, Architect 355 S. Third Street Boise, ID 83702 RE:__lo~nd LJ~e_ gl:1ang~ Agpjjcatio~".CreeksidaArboLlrJI. Dear Mr. Knopp: Enclosed please find a Land Use Change Application for your use to file with the Irrigation District for its review on the above-referenced development. If this development is under a "rush" to be finalized, I would recommend that you submit a cashier's check, money order or cash as payment of the fees in order to speed the process up. If you submit a company or personal check, it must clear the bank before processing the application. Should this development be pianning a pressure urban irrigation system that will be owned, operated and maintained by the Irrigation District, I strongly urge you to coordinate with John P. Anderson, Water Superintendent for the Irrigation District, concerning the installation of the pressure system. Enclosed is a questionnaire that you must fill out and return in order to initiate the process of contractual agreements between the owner or developer and the Irrigation District for the ownership, operation and maintenance of the pressure urban irrigation system. If you have any questions concerning this matter, pi ease feel free to call on me at the District's office, or John P. Anderson, at the District's shop. Sincereiy, JV!-M-d-~. >r}rl1L Donna N. Moore, Asst. SecretaryfTreasurer NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT DNM/smc cc: File Water Superintendent Will Berg, City Clerk, City of Meridian Bill and Lucy Leavell, 2720 S. Ariel Lane, Meridian, ID 83642 Creekside Arbour II, LLC, 1425 E. Fifth, Meridian, ID 83642 enc. APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS. 23.000 BOISE PROJEG RIGHTS - 40,000 RECEIVED NOV - 4 2002 City of Meridian '1A_d.L. _ &. CityCler.kOffic', '~ ~1~Z'~ 1503 FIRST STREff SOUTH NAMPA, IDAHO 83651-4395 FAX # 208.463-0092 October 31, 2002 Phones: Area Code 208 OFFICE: Nompo 466-7861 SHOP: Nompo 466-0663 ___.. Will Berg, City Clerk .e'ity-o~4Hm 33 East Idllho Meridian, ill 83642 Re: CUP 02-040 Conditional Use Permit for proposed Creekside Arbour II Dear Commissioners: The Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District requires that a Land Use Change/Site application be filed. Please contact Ms. Donna Moore, Asst. Secretary/Treasurer at the District's main office at 466-7861. Sincerely, 17#61~ Bil! Henson, Asst. Water Superintendent NAMPA & MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRlCT BH/dl! Cc: File - Shop File - Office Water Superintendent APPROXIMATE IRRIGABLE ACRES RIVER FLOW RIGHTS. 23,000 BOISE PROJECT RIGHTS. 40,000 T~ __ ~.~ g~~T~~~ CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT R _HEALTH Environmental Health Division eturO" t::. e DEPARTMENT RECEIVED OIS DEagle NOV.., 1 inn? 0 Garden City ~ertdian o Kuna OACZ o Star Rezone # Conditional Use # Preliminary / Final/Short Plat CuP () .!) -Ot.{ 0 City of Meridhm City Clerk dUlC,< C.r e. c:> ~.U,J<P 14-rL~ II 01 02. 03. 04. 05. 06. o 7. fis. ~. ~. We have No Objections to this Proposal. We recommend Denial of this Proposal. Specific knowledge as to the exact type of use must be provided before we can comment on this Proposal. We will require more data concerning soil conditions on this Proposal before we can comment. Before we can comment concerning individual sewage disposal, we will require more data concerning the depth of: o high seasonal ground water 0 waste fiow charactertstics o or bedrock from original grade 0 other This office will require a study to assess the impact of nutrients and pathogens to receiving ground waters and/or surface waters. This project shall be reviewed by the Idaho Department of Water Resources concerning well construction and water availability. After wri~approvai from appropriate entities are submitted, we can approve this proposal for: ~ralsewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water well o interim sewage 4central water o individual sewage 0 individual water The fOllowing plan(s) must be submitted to and approved by the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare, Division of ~vironmental Quality: -Et-eentral sewage 0 community sewage system 0 community water o sewage dry lines ~tral water Run-off is not to create a mosquito breeding problem. o 11. This Department would recommend deferral until high seasonal ground water can be determined if other considerations indicate approval. o 12. If restroom facilities are to be installed, then a sewage system MUST be installed to meet Idaho State Sewage Regulations. o 13. We will require plans be submitted for a plan review for any: o food establishment 0 swimming pools or spas o beverage establishment 0 grocery store pl14. o child care center /7t.ULU' ,<c~ _rr-~/"'d2:1 , ;(ec~J~ ~/--WIW;;,-?'2- Date: .fl.J ~ ~ 2- Reviewed By: .4..-# ~~.f CDHD9IDDlkc Review Sheet PUBLIC HEARING SIGN-UP SHEET RECEIVED GEe 1 9 2DD2 CITY OF MERIDIAN DATE December 19, 2002 PROJECT NUMBER CUP 02-040 PROJECT NAME Creekside Arbour II NAME FOR AGAINST J tf) tlfl!/ D. J< c) 'is ~ -,- . . . , ELM GROVE TRIILER CT. P.O. Box 155. Meridian, 10 B3680 Loren D. Ross, Manager/Owner 888-666B or 88B-5694 December 11, 2002 RECEIVED DEe 12 2002 qty Of Meridian CIty Clerk Office Planning & Zoning Dept. 600 E. Watertower Ln., Ste. 202 Meridian, ID 83642 RE: Creek Side Arbor Phase II - Road Drainage Planning & Zoning Committee Members: In March of 200 I I had conversations wi th and wrote a letter to the Meridian Building Department concerning drainage onto my property (see copy of letter enclosed). This took place during the development of Creek Side Arbor Phase II. There are no easements on or across my property to accommodate drainage. There is a drainage pick-up point at the intersection of Gruber and East Third Street (west side of my property). The most logical solution would be to tile across my property to the pick-up point. The ACHD, the City of Meridian and the Leavell's need to address the problem. I will not support more development of the Leavell's land until such time as the drainage problem is cured. Sincerely, ELM GROVE TRAILER COURT ~~-~ Loren D. Ross Manager/Owner enc.: Letter & photos ... ..' ~ "'! ElM GROVE TRAilER CT. P.O. Box 155 . Meridian, ID 83680 Loren D. Ross, Manager 888-6668 or 888-5694 (C~~'1f March 8, 2001 Mr. Brad Watson, P.E. City of Meridian 200 E. Carlton, Ste. 100 Meridian, 10 83642 REGISTERED RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED RE: Creek Side Arbor Phase II - Road Drainage Dear Mr. Watson: On March 7, 2001, per our telephone conversation, I expressed concern about the drainage of Badley Street being transferred to my property. I sold property in January 1993 to Bill & Lucille Leavell for the purpose of Badley Street being extended from 2% Street. Completion of Badley until the development of Creek Side Arbor Phase II, drainage was on Leavell's land. It is my understanding that part of Badley Street is private. Show me a law that supports road drainage without benefit of a drain bed. Per our conversation on the 71.h, you said that testimony was given that I had been contacted and agreed to the road drainage to my property. That is not correct. I would encourage disclosure of the individual that made that statement. The statement should have. been a written document with my signature to give merit to the decision-making process. You made reference to a "historic drain ditch" that existed to remedy drainage. That drain ditch has been inactive for many years (approx. 20 yrs. since fill dirt was added to my property and surrounding property). In May of 1999 the Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District expressed no interest or concern about the ditch (see enclosure). The ditch has been partially backfilled for years. Suppose for a moment that the drain ditch was still active. Again, show me a law that supports street drainage into a ditch or canal. My concern is future development of my land. I will not accept responsibility for drainage of Badley Street or any other development. I anxiously await your response. Sincerely, Loren D. Ross cc: Sheri Stiles, Planning & Zoning enc.