Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-06-24 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the June 10, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the June 10, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025- 0060) 4. Frontline Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025-0061) 5. Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 Emergency Access Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025-0062) 6. Aviation Subdivision Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025-0065) 7. Final Order for Addison Circle Subdivision (FP-2025-0004) by Tamee Crawford, Centurion Engineers, Inc., located at 4535 N. Black Cat Rd. 8. Final Order for Apex Phenomenal (FP-2025-0005), by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/2 mile east of S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Adero Mixed-Use Neighborhood (H-2024- 0068) by DevCo, LLC, located near the NWC of N. Ten Mile and McMillan Rd. 10. Approval of New Alcohol License (ALCN-2025-0009) for Level Up Lounge at 830 N. Main St., operating within three hundred (300) feet of a property used for a church or any other place of worship, or any public or private education institution 11. Development Agreement (Foldesi Reserve H-2024-0055) Between City of Meridian and Sherburne Development LLC for Property Located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. 12. Development Agreement (Mondt Meadows Subdivision H-2024-0067) Between City of Meridian and Riverwood Homes Inc. and Mondt Properties LLC for Property Located at 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Ln. 13. Development Agreement (Skyranch H-2024-0022) between the City of Meridian and Hubbard1 LLC and C4 Land LLC and Jesse Wakley and Jennifer Wakley and Eagle1 LLC for Property Located Near the Northeast Corner of S. Meridian Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd. 14. Idaho Intrastate Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (IdWARN) Mutual Aid and Assistance Agreement 15. Approval of Purchase Order #25-0401 to Hughes Fire for a 2025 Pierce 100’ Ladder Truck for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $1,870,000.00 16. Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements 17. Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Ada County Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements 18. Resolution No. 25-2523: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Concerning 10.28 Acres of Land to Allow for Larger Estate Lots, Generally Located at 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Lane, in a Portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; and Providing an Effective Date 19. Resolution No. 25-2524: A Resolution Vacating a 3-Foot-Wide Public Utility, Drainage, and Irrigation (PUDI) Easement Located at Lot 31, Block 3 and a Portion of Lot 32, Block 3 of Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, Being More Particularly Described in Exhibit "A"; and Providing an Effective Date 20. Resolution 25-2525: A Resolution Amending the Police Department Records Retention Schedule; Authorizing the Chief of Police and City Clerk to Implement the Schedule; and providing an effective date 21. City of Meridian Financial Report - May 2025 ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 22. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $550,075 for Employee Benefits Plan Trust Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 23. Valley Regional Transit Fiscal Year 2026 Program Budget Request 24. Potential Public/Private Partnership for Sewer Line Installation Continued to June 24, 2025 Regular Meeting ADJOURNMENT 5:49 PM Meridian City Council Work Session June 24, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, June 24, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Tina Lomeli, Bill Nary, Todd Lavoie, Warren Stewart, Shawn Harper, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts X John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call the meeting to order. For the record it is June 24th, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adopt the agenda as presented. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as presented. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the June 10, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the June 10, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 2 of 26 3. Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025-0060) 4. Frontline Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025-0061) 5. Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 Emergency Access Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025-0062) 6. Aviation Subdivision Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025- 0065) 7. Final Order for Addison Circle Subdivision (FP-2025-0004) by Tamee Crawford, Centurion Engineers, Inc., located at 4535 N. Black Cat Rd. 8. Final Order for Apex Phenomenal (FP-2025-0005), by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/2 mile east of S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Adero Mixed-Use Neighborhood (H-2024-0068) by DevCo, LLC, located near the NWC of N. Ten Mile and McMillan Rd. 10. Approval of New Alcohol License (ALCN-2025-0009) for Level Up Lounge at 830 N. Main St., operating within three hundred (300) feet of a property used for a church or any other place of worship, or any public or private education institution 11. Development Agreement (Foldesi Reserve H-2024-0055) Between City of Meridian and Sherburne Development LLC for Property Located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. 12. Development Agreement (Mondt Meadows Subdivision H-2024-0067) Between City of Meridian and Riverwood Homes Inc. and Mondt Properties LLC for Property Located at 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Ln. 13. Development Agreement (Skyranch H-2024-0022) between the City of Meridian and Hubbard1 LLC and C4 Land LLC and Jesse Wakley and Jennifer Wakley and Eaglet LLC for Property Located Near the Northeast Corner of S. Meridian Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd. 14. Idaho Intrastate Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (IdWARN) Mutual Aid and Assistance Agreement 15. Approval of Purchase Order#25-0401 to Hughes Fire for a 2025 Pierce 100' Ladder Truck for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $1,870,000.00 Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 3 of 26 16. Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements 17. Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Ada County Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements 18. Resolution No. 25-2523: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Concerning 10.28 Acres of Land to Allow for Larger Estate Lots, Generally Located at 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Lane, in a Portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; and Providing an Effective Date 19. Resolution No. 25-2524: A Resolution Vacating a 3-Foot-Wide Public Utility, Drainage, and Irrigation (PUDI) Easement Located at Lot 31, Block 3 and a Portion of Lot 32, Block 3 of Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, Being More Particularly Described in Exhibit "A"; and Providing an Effective Date 20. Resolution 25-2525: A Resolution Amending the Police Department Records Retention Schedule; Authorizing the Chief of Police and City Clerk to Implement the Schedule; and providing an effective date 21. City of Meridian Financial Report - May 2025 Simison: Next up is the Consent Agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we approve the Consent Agenda. For the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 4 of 26 ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 22. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $550,075 for Employee Benefits Plan Trust Simison: So, we will move on to Department/Commission Reports. First item up is Item 22, fiscal this year 2025 budget amendment in the amount of 550,075 dollars for employee benefits plan trust and I will turn this over to Trust Member Nary, City Attorney Nary or Bill. Nary: Thank you, sir. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, you have the budget amendment in front of you. This is, as we had mentioned the last couple of presentations, this is just to basically fill the gap of the current deficit that we have been experiencing in our reserve amount that's required for us to maintain for the Department of Insurance. Originally we had proposed the possibility of a budget amendment that includes some anticipated cost. After further discussion decided to simply just fill that gap now as we go through the rest of the fiscal year, as well as the rest of the calendar year through the plan. The numbers tend to fluctuate depending on usage. So, we will -- we always monitor that and if we need to have a conversation later or come back at a different point in the year, either the fiscal year or the calendar year, for an adjustment we will come back and bring that information back to the Council. Council Member Cavener had asked some questions in anticipation of today. We would ask for the approval of the budget amendment. We had some -- had some particular questions that I could help answer and I will just go through them. Who is monitoring the trust balances? The staff, the trust Gallagher or BCI? So, the trust balances are monitored by the trust. So, the trustees and the HR staff monitor that. We do get also reports from Gallagher as to usage monthly. We do get reports from Blue Cross as to how the usage is. So, we have some idea of what usage has occurred. They do give us notices if there was a potential high claim that may come through. Often claims don't start off very high. I mean as you can imagine with any type of medical condition they sometimes tend to start, depending what the condition is they may grow over time. So, something you could look at it and anticipate there may be some increased costs for certain types of conditions, but oftentimes you don't know that upfront, but we do get -- but it is monitored by the trust itself. Who is approving charges against the trust? I wasn't sure, Councilman Cavener, who do you mean who is -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: If Luke shows up at the doctor's office and they take my insurance. So, then, that goes to Blue Cross -- Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 5 of 26 Nary: Correct. Cavener: -- and, then, Blue Cross I assume, then, bills against the balance of the trust. Nary: So -- so, they adjudicate the claim is what the terminology of the industry is. They determine that it's covered -- it's a covered claim and how much of it's covered and depending on the circumstances of the individual, whether it's covered as a claim against the deductible. Have they met their deductible? Have they exceeded their -- have they hit their stop loss of the deductible. Depending where it fits in their individual claim, then -- then they would build back the trust after the deductions are made. So, for all of -- most -- well, at least as far as I know all of the carriers have deductions that are related to services, either for medications or for services that are provided for different covered doctors, you have within the -- within the plan, outside of the plan, so, again, all of that stuff gets adjudicated through the carrier. So, through Blue Cross. Then it gets charged to the trust. So, then, that amount gets charged back to the trust. We get an accounting for all of that, so we know what those numbers are and those charges are, but they don't get -- but they are charged once it occurs; right? So, the individual doesn't experience that. I mean they experience the services and, then, of course, sometimes they get billed later, which is fairly common in a lot of this industry where some get paid for their deductible up front, then, they get billed later for the remaining charges once all that's done. So, does that answer your question? Cavener: Yeah. Is that -- is that an automatic process or does the trust have to take an action? Nary: No, the trust does not have to take an action. Cavener: So, it's an automatic process? Nary: Yes. And, then, when the process -- when is the deficit discovered? So, what happens is over the accounting period, each quarter, of course, we get accounting. We have -- the trust has an accountant that keeps all of -- that track. But we also have to track for the Department of Insurance. And, then, the folks here from HR are here as well if you have specific questions. So, we, then, determine as we report quarterly to the Department of Insurance we report where our trust stands. So, like, for example, after the first quarter we recognize there was a deficit, because of the higher usage. We reported that deficit. And what normally happens is Department of Insurance, at least historically, they don't normally come back after one quarter of a deficit, because things get adjusted. Some of it takes time, because adjustments don't all happen immediately. So, there are adjustments that come through through the regular process. There are rebates that come through through additional process through the carrier. So, sometimes it takes a while for that adjustment to finalize as to where it is and how much it is. So, oftentimes what we have seen historically with the Department of Insurance is that we will notify that, hey, we have noticed this amount and we are aware of it and we will, then, have a conversation at the trust level on how do we want to address it and usually we will wait one or two quarters to figure out how much is it Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 6 of 26 really? Is it this number that we determined after one quarter? Is it a different number after the second quarter and after all the adjustments have been made and, then, what else other ways to address it. For example, if I reported to you one of the recent ones that we had some concerns about some of the drugs and there was one drug that was available to change how the payment was being done for it. It took a while. It couldn't actually -- we had to -- we could implement it now, it would go into effect in October, but would help lower some of the cost for that particular drug. We agreed at the trustee level to go ahead and initiate that program. Blue Cross on their own initiated a way to help bring that forward a little faster than October. They could bring it forward in July. That would help lower some costs. We would get some more rebate towards that and help bring some of the costs of that particular drug down. We only had -- if I remember properly I think we only had one or two employees on that particular drug. But every little bit helps. So, it really depends. We look at all the methods. Is there other ways to address it before just simply asking for more funds? Is there a way to adjust the program? Way to adjust any of the way it's being managed? Can we do anything different? And also can we let it ride a little bit, because, again, it depends a lot of medical -- and, again, you have to remember when we are talking about the trust it's not just medical, it's also dental and vision, but a lot of them are very -- can vary -- fluctuate by time of year, season, depending on what they are. So, a lot of folks, for example, for maintenance types of things, people will go early in the year and do a lot of those things when they have their flexible spending accounts are replenished and now they can go take care of maintenance things, because they have those funds available to them. So, they will do that. Other -- and, then, they will let it ride for a while, you know, unless they have kids and things like that that have other issues, but they will let it ride. But also once people have reached their deductible it's very common -- and we know this from the trust side -- that towards the end of the year, if people have reached their deductible, they tend to go get a lot of other things done, because they have met their maximum out of pocket and now they can get some other things done. So, we try to look at those trends to try to figure out is this going to adjust differently down, up, where are we going to land and if we get to a point where we decide from the trust standpoint we want to adjust that, we really don't wait for the Department of Insurance to tell us to do it, we usually look at it and go we are going to anticipate that's probably where we are going to land. So, let's try to be in front of it. Let's try to be more proactive as a trust and let's -- instead of just waiting until the Department of Insurance says you need to fix it or address it, let's just address it. We think it's important, we want stay in front of those things, so that's how we do that, so -- Cavener: Okay. Nary: -- it's a long answer to your question, but that's kind of how we look at it. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 7 of 26 Cavener: Bill, here is I think the part where some of these questions are coming from. This is where I need help or guidance from the trust. A year ago when we were going into the budget it was communicated to us no increase in health insurance. Now, we understand now that was because you guys spent reserves to not have it -- so, there was an increase, but there wasn't an increase in the request from employees. Nary: Correct. Cavener: And, then, you know, to learn, hey, we are going to come with a budget amendment, initially told for 550,000 dollars, which is before us tonight and, then, for me to later, then, get an e-mail for really 1.2 million dollars, it makes it hard to understand kind of where we are in this process and how we as a Council can predict what the expenses and increases are going to be, particularly under such significant budget constraints. So, how can the Council be best kept into the loop of what these changes are and how can -- what one Council Member being told in one meeting be consistent with what's going to be asked for the entirety of the Council. Nary: Well, I wish I had an easy answer for that. The reason for that difference that you saw was -- when you and I spoke about that we were talking about the deficit. Hundred percent. When we were crafting a budget amendment it was the trust and partly at my urging to say rather than us coming back again at another point in time, that we are going to anticipate there is costs that are going to go against the trust and we are seeing this trend and, in fact, Council Member Whitlock provided me some information that we are not alone in this. This trend of increasing cost of medical is very much not just localized, but nationally. They are seeing it in every place. The state -- for example, there was a recent article in the Statesman talking about the state of Idaho and their cost increase. But, anyway, so what we were trying to do is be proactive and say are we anticipating -- what are our costs going to be over the rest of this fiscal year or calendar year? Should we get in front of that? And, then, in that -- in the narrative of that original budget amendment we tried to capture some of that in that -- in that narrative in there as to where this number came from and that it wasn't just -- we thought it was 550, now it's 1 .2 million. Now, the 550 was still the same. The additional potential was trying to get in front of where we see it. If we know we are spending approximately 94,000 dollars a month for cost that we anticipate without any other changes, knowing how much comes in from client -- from the premiums, that we are still going to have this gap, rather than coming back to you -- and since we only have one chance for a budget amendment now, rather than coming back in October and saying, well, we have another deficit or coming back in December, but afterwards it was decided, okay, let's not -- let's not -- let's not speculate. Let's just take what's the known, which is the 550, let's do that and we will come back later and report here is where we are. Here is the trends, here is where it occurred, up, down, wherever it lands and that's where we are. Cavener: So, Mr. Mayor, one more if I may. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 8 of 26 Cavener: Bill, I hear you on that and I think that the challenge is that the trust is informed of this, but that information isn't being relayed to the Council until these budget amendments are coming and so I guess that's where I'm looking to you as the chair of the trust to come up with a better plan to keep us informed and whether that is quarterly updates, whether that is monthly financials, whether it is something that you and the trust and our Finance Department thinks is most appropriate, I don't like being surprised with these types of things and I don't -- I don't think there is anything malicious, but it's frustrating to -- essentially, to me it has felt like the story has changed on this depending on the questions that are being asked and -- and I know that's not anyone's intent, that's just how it appears to me and -- and I want to eliminate that and so I guess I'm looking for you as the chair to help give us some insight as to the best way to resolve that concern. Nary: And, honestly, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Councilman Cavener, whatever you would like. All the trust meetings are open. They are all advertised. All the information is transparent. We certainly can transmit that to the Council monthly, quarterly. We could do a presentation quarterly, biannually, whatever you would prefer. Cavener: Okay. Nary: Not a concern at all. I mean we can certainly provide you that information. Understand -- and, again, in the -- in the wealth of information that we get, without context, sometimes it may be a lot of information that really doesn't have a lot of substance for everybody. But, again, we can provide you the information and, then, plan on a quarterly meeting, so you know what's going to come in front of you or where it is trending up or down. That's not a problem. We can do that. Cavener: I will chat -- Mr. Mayor, I will chat with the Council, Council Vice-President Strader and maybe you and I connect and come up with an action plan around that. Thank you, Bill. Simison: And, really, whatever you all want. Again, they don't report to me either in the context. So, whatever you want I will want from the trust. I mean it's a weird entity in that context. I can't compel them to do anything anymore than you can compel them to do something, but I think they are more than willing to do whatever we want them to do. So, that's -- that is the clear case of however you want the information they will -- they will provide it. I have no doubt in that. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I really think like a pretty simple quarterly update with just some basic financial information about whether you are running at a surplus or a deficit compared to, you know, your projections and key trends would be great. I think just keeping it simple -- I don't -- I take your point. I don't need to read through detailed like claims information Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 9 of 26 and stuff like that really wouldn't be appropriate. Like I think we just -- I think we just need more communication is the answer; right? Like I think we are going to get to the right spot. I think just a great like simple quarterly update for everybody that kind of lets us know, okay, are we at a surplus or a deficit and if we see two quarters in a row where we are running at a deficit I think that will be a heads up for all of us, okay, we have got an issue, now it's time to be proactive. Let's start having some discussions and conversations. I just think it's one of those things that it's really hard for us to get our arms around it when it's coming in front of us once a year. So, I think if you come quarterly that could be a great -- great answer and I'm happy to sit down with Council President Cavener and chat further if needed about like what some key metrics are, but I think just like keeping it simple, a quick check in I think -- I think that would be great. Nary: Yes, that's not a problem. Strader: Thanks a lot. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Thanks, Bill. Just a quick question. I want to make sure I'm understanding it. The way the 550,000 for the budget amendment will be -- will be spread across the different departments and functions of the city and everyone will kind of pay sort of their share. I'm looking at your memo here. We got Council, the clerk, Mayor's office, City Hall, each department. Is that -- in there I see a reflective number. Is that how each department will be paying a portion of the budget amendment sort of allocated it? Am I understanding that correctly? Nary: That -- you would have to ask Finance. Taylor: Okay. Nary: It simply comes out of -- out of the fund balance. But I mean it is allocated based on the membership. So, membership are divided up by employees. Lavoie: Council, again, that is a percentage of how we see the budgeted distribution of funds. So, it's our best estimate on where we believe the expenses will occur based on historical data. Taylor: Okay. Lavoie: As Bill stated, the actuals will be the actuals. That's our best guess. Taylor: Okay. Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 10 of 26 Simison: And maybe just one thing that to add and I know the question is about how do you predict, how do you get to it. I think that the conversation will -- I think the more conversation there is the better, because ultimately the Council's best place to set expectations is in -- on the front end in terms of here is the amount of money that you are willing to fund the trust, so they can build a plan to that amount. The trust doesn't have a great way to control the back end on when people spend more than is there and that is just reacting to what the plan is that we put in place. So, if -- you know, if there is concerns on the amount that the trust is costing and it -- you know, as a general whole I don't think one year is the best year to look at it, but I think that's -- well, what are the plan design or what's the financial amount that Council is comfortable providing to the trust and they will build the best plan they can with the money that's been provided and, then, we can all just communicate and when we see those trends we -- those expectations can happen. But it's really hard to know when healthcare costs hit and predict and not have an impact from that. Nary: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: After Mr. Nary's presentation, no additional questions, I move that we approve the fiscal year 2025 budget amendment in the amount of 550,075 dollars for the employee benefit plan trust. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Item 22. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk call the roll. Roll Call- Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 23. Valley Regional Transit Fiscal Year 2026 Program Budget Request Simison: Next item up is Item 23, which is Valley Regional Transit fiscal year 2026 program budget request and it looks like it's not going to be Stephen that's going to come up, but invite Elaine up to the podium. Clegg: Is it this one or that one? Cavener: Either one. Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 11 of 26 Simison: Either one. Clegg: Okay. Yeah. I'm usurping him again. I believe that's okay. Well, Mr. Mayor, Council Members, thank you for having me. I don't know if I'm quite as exciting as the healthcare trust, but hopefully I can keep you all interested. Really excited today to bring you some information about how the last year has gone. You know, we made a big service change last year and when you make those kinds of big changes in transit systems it -- it can be kind of rocky, but, in fact, it's gone pretty well. So, excited about -- about what we have to show you. Oops. What did I do? So, today I'm going to talk about our recent -- recent accomplishments, some of the projects that we are working on, our funding request, which is always important and, then, like to open a discussion that we don't have to answer today, but -- about maybe a process that would allow us to plan a little more longer term, give us maybe all a little more certainty and predictability. So, recent accomplishments, we, as you know, did a big service change in 2024. Services in Meridian changed a bit. What we did was take the Route 45, move it off Fairview and move it onto Pine and, then, take the Route 30 and make it every other with the Route 45. We also instituted a new route that -- two new routes. One from Town Square Mall in Boise that hits The Village and the Route 42, which used to just be a peak hour commute route, is now every hour all day and it runs through the southern part of Meridian on -- on Overland. Those changes have been successful overall. I will talk about some of the bits and pieces and why it looks the way it does. We also in 2024 implemented Beyond Access, which is a consolidated service of senior centers and Harvest Transit and various things. The City of Meridian Senior Center did not join that. It may be a conversation later on, but Harvest Transit did and overall it's been a very successful change. We also held the first annual Community Transit Association of Idaho Transit Day at the Capitol to begin raising the profile, I guess if you will, of transit around the state and begin talking about the economic impact of transit, which is pretty high. So, the Meridian network -- I thought we had a different slide here. Okay. Meridian network is, as I mentioned, relatively simple. We have got the Route 42 on the southern end. We have got the -- both the Route 45 and the 30 through the middle and, then, that new one that comes from the Town Square Mall and hits The Village. Ridership on these is varied and I want to talk you through what the differences are. So, the Route 24 didn't exist before. It now has 16,000 riders. Twenty-five hundred of those originate in Meridian, but you should know that those riders are ones that are, you know contributing to your economy, even if they don't originate here. The Route 30 actually got service cut in about half. That service was added to the Route 45, so the fact that it's down 18.3 percent is -- if you think about the service hours it has now compared to the service hours it had before are actually higher rather than lower, even though it -- that seems counterintuitive. The Route 40 is still a peak hour route. You can see it's also up quite a bit. The Route 42 is up a fair amount, including up in Meridian. Route 45 is up a lot, but the ridership in Meridian is not up as much as we would like to see. In fact, it's down a little bit. We think it's the change from Fairview to Pine and not finding the riders yet on Pine, but losing some on Fairview. So, that's a route that we would like to investigate and see if we can make better. I think the important thing is that overall there is an increase in ridership, even though we are showing a lower ridership on the 30, overall if you look counting -- accounting for those Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 12 of 26 changes in hours on the 30, we think we are in very good shape and if you look at our forecast -- so, here is the other interesting thing when you make these kinds of changes. Typically you see a reduction in ridership the first year and, in fact, we have seen an increase in ridership overall and we are projecting an even bigger increase next year. So, like we say, overall ridership is up. Transit activity in Meridian is up if you take all of the routes and we would like to explore alternatives for the 30 and 45 and see what we can do to make those better. Beyond access is the service I talked about that consolidated a lot of the senior centers. So, previously we had five different zones and 11 different -- 12 different providers. We had 12 different phone numbers. We were paying administration for 12 different services. It was not a very efficient way to provide this -- these rides and if I'm a senior and I'm in Meridian and I want to go to Boise I can't go to Boise, because my zone doesn't include Boise or if I want to go to Nampa. So, now they are all one zone. The purple area is all one zone. We are moving people in between all of those and, again, with change it's hard at the beginning, but we are beginning -- we are now seeing an increase in ridership and, in fact, to the point where we are almost at capacity. So, we are going to have to talk about -- about capacity at some point on this service, but it's -- from our perspective been a really good success. It's lowered those administrative costs and put those into more -- more rides available. So, it was launched in 2024. Ridership in those first nine months was 8,780. Here is the big thing that is -- should be of interest to Meridian. Because you are in the middle of the region, I think, 41.3 percent of all trips are beyond access are serving Meridian. You guys are getting a big bang for your buck there. Your percent population is only 17.4 percent of the whole region and 25 percent of the county. So, I think for Meridian this -- this has been a great success. Rides to Wellness is another one that you contribute to and, again, ridership on it is up tremendously. We are looking at ways to move some of those rides to cheaper rides and beyond access, for instance, and fixed route are both ways that we could move those people more efficiently. So, we are looking at strategies to co-mingle those services and see if we can be -- use that money more efficiently. But, regardless, the money to date this year has gone very far. Veteran shuttle is not a lot of rides, but for those vets it's a really important ride and, again, that one's up as well. You all do contribute to these specialized services and it's a big part of their success. So, thank you for that. And, yes, we are asking for that contribution again. So, current projects. Beyond Access we would like to expand it not just to Rides to Wellness, but we are looking at co-mingling it with rides to the general public. So, right now there is not any on-demand rides in Meridian for the general public, only for older adults and persons with disabilities. We have been talking to FTA about the efficacy of doing that in terms of how our funding comes in and they believe that they -- we have -- I actually went to a conference and saw some systems that are doing that and it's working quite well. So, we are working right now with our data provider to create a data database that could co-mingle those rides and we would like to work with your staff to make sure as we do that that we figure out a way to do it that -- that can help riders in Meridian who currently don't have access, because of the limited span geographically of the service that you do have, all east-west and no north-south. We also have a ride called VRT lift pass to high ridership stops and it's been -- we have expanded that with the service change. In doing that we saw a tremendous increase in rides in the places we were able to expand it and we would like to talk to you about the Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 13 of 26 possibility of expanding it into Meridian. So, again, we could reach some of those riders that today don't have access. And, then, we are working on Valley Connect 3.0. Your staff has been participating and we are looking at that plan over the long term of planning to expand service north-south between Meridian and Eagle and potentially in long -- longer longer term between Meridian and Kuna. So, again, just like to make sure to continue to work on those. So, here is a -- the VRT lift pass program. The zone on the right -- what color does it show up for you? Pink zone is where it is today and as I noted we are seeing a big increase in people using that. We would like to explore expanding it across Meridian, so that people in Meridian could have access to either stops at CWI, stops at The Village, stops on Overland that would, then, get them onto the fixed route, so that they could go farther. All of these, you know, as I'm talking about this, it's not that we are going to necessarily ask you for more money, we would like to have a conversation about what it would cost to do these things, what efficiencies we could find, ways to save money and in the end is there something that we could do that would expand access to your riders that would be reasonable for all of us? So, just wanted to talk about the possibilities as we see some real -- some real big ones, frankly, in Meridian. This is the Valley Connect 3.0 network and the draft plan that we have got and you can see if we are able to institute this there would be a tremendous increase in ridership -- in access to rides in the north-south area in Meridian. Right now those don't exist much and we know as we look at the data that there is a lot of demand for it. That network would also provide your riders with good access into Boise. You will see the red line on there is the rail corridor and remind me, Stephen, does the gen map include rides on the rail corridor or not? I don't think it does, does it? It does? Okay. If -- if and when we get -- I should say when, because I'm confident we are going to get it. When we get the rail corridor folks in this part of Meridian are going to have much better access across the region. So, we talked to some of you early and to the Mayor early. We got a request to keep our request at the same amount as we did last year. We are, in fact, just at that. We still are asking for those -- the support for those special services. You saw the impact of those on -- on your population and the fixed route as it's been changed during the change day, we are really confident and excited about the growth in ridership that we are seeing there. So, before I go on to this maybe any questions about -- about where we are and what we are planning? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Yeah. I just have a little -- a couple of questions on the lift pass. I think that's a great idea and I'm glad to hear it. It's seems like it's been working. Do you have some data on like who are the -- the users of the lift pass? Are these -- is there a certain -- I mean it's not those who are like the -- those getting rides to maybe hospitals, but maybe it is. Could -- do you have some data on who are the typical users? Clegg; And Stephen maybe has more data on that. You know, Stephen -- you are welcome to come up, Stephen. As we look at the riders of lift pass they are typically people who would use fixed route if it were available, but it's not. Many of them today Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 14 of 26 are using a lift or an Uber that costs 20 or more dollars. We are able to make the lift pass available for two dollars if they only go to that nearest transit stop and it provides them a much cheaper way to -- to get on to transit and complete their ride. Hunt: Yeah. We don't -- we don't market the lift pass differently than the general -- than to the general public and it doesn't require any kind of eligibility. So, we don't have specific demographics on who uses the lift, but in terms of what they are using it for, how it differs from -- from say a Rides to Wellness type of trip is that it's designed to get people to the closest bus stop. We are seeing people who maybe live a little farther away from transit use it to get to -- to a stop and, then, continue on the ride. So, it could be ideal for something like the stop on -- on Overland at -- at Lowe's where we have a lot of people getting on the 40 or 42 or a Ten Mile or at The Village. Taylor: Mr. Mayor, quick follow up. Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Then what is -- and maybe you will get into this a little bit later, but expanding that service into Meridian is that because we need to subsidize the -- essentially paying for part of that lift pass? Clegg: Yeah. Right now we have a actual private foundation grant that we have been using to subsidize that. We are looking for another one. We haven't yet identified one that we have been awarded, but we do -- the way that that pass works is we ask the rider to pay two dollars, we will pay six dollars. If the ride is over eight dollars they pay the difference beyond that and so we know it's a fixed subsidy and so, yes, we -- what we would want to do is identify what we think the ridership would be if we expanded the zone to include Meridian and, then, identify what we think the cost of that would be and either go after another private sector foundation grant or work with you on -- on another funding opportunity. Hunt: So, the lift driver -- it doesn't look any different if they just pick the person up and now my drop off is here, but the rider actually says, okay, to get this discounted ride I'm going to go to this closest stop. Taylor: Okay. Thank you. Clegg: Yeah. They use the lift app just as through the VRT piece of it. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I just had a couple questions before you move on. So, it looked like there were about 74,000 rides. What percentage of those originate in Meridian? I just wanted to go through the numbers again. Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 15 of 26 Clegg: Let's go back to that. Getting there. Sorry. Again, Stephen can help you with this. So, when we talk about boardings in Meridian only, of those 74,000 in the '24, '25 -- nine months 15,000 of those. Strader: Uh-huh. Okay. And, then, you know, I hate to put you on the spot like this, but I understand setting up -- Mr. Mayor, if you don't mind? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Setting up a public transit program is challenging. It takes a while. Investments. You have to get adoption. You need frequency. But at what point is it appropriate for us to start looking at just cost per ride? Because if I look at cost per ride in Meridian I'm kind of scratching my head. I have been a supporter of public transit. I think it's important for us to invest in. It's much more efficient. But there are changes in technology coming with automation. Robo taxis. We have a lot of disruption I think just generally coming to our economy through artificial intelligence. How are you guys thinking about those things? And, then, just from a -- just general perspective at what point do we sort of hone in on more of a cost per ride. Like when are we mature enough to start looking at that? Because if I look at cost per ride it's huge and I'm struggling with that, because as you know -- and I appreciate you holding funding requests flat. We are in a really horribly challenging budget perspective on our operating costs. Not on our capital costs, not on our impact fees, things like that are fine, but our operating costs are super tough right now. So, I kind of just want to talk through those things. Clegg: Sure. So, we are at a place with this transit system where in the places we can provide the kind of frequencies that we know really attract people, our cost per ride is -- is going down tremendously and the performance is going up. In the places where that frequency is not as high, the cost per ride is -- is still pretty high. So, it's a chicken and egg thing. If you -- if you cut service that cost per ride, for whatever is left, is actually going to go up. It's not going to go down. If we can figure out ways to provide more service, then, the cost per ride is going to go down. So, all of those things I talked about on the future of, you know, here is ways that we can get more out of the money we are spending already are designed to do just that. There is also the opportunity -- we have -- we have identified some opportunities with some of the federal funding around the carbon reduction program and some other things that we think hold some real promise in providing us a little bit lower cost per ride subsidy. We also are working hard with some private sector investment in -- that will end up providing earnings to us, which -- and cost reductions and we -- we plan to share all of those with our partners when we get there. But the -- the challenge is that right now it's pretty expensive to run and if we cut it it's going to be more expensive to run and it will be harder to do those things I just talked about it to make it more efficient. So, I will be honest with you, I'm asking partners this year to stick with us, give us a chance to make this work. We think we can. We are trying to lean into those disruptions in technology. That conference I talked about was all about saying how do you take a fixed route system, an on-demand system and a VRT lift system and make them all one so that you get the most out of that Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 16 of 26 in one system instead of paying for each of them separately and we think that there are efficiencies there and cost savings there. We are looking at cost savings on renewed natural gas that will also bring us some rebates and so lots of other things we are trying really hard to identify. I know the budgets are tough. I've sat on your side of the dais and it is a really really tough time and so I know it's asking a lot to say stick with us through this if you can, because we are really working hard to be on the cusp of making this better and we think we can, but if we -- if we go backwards and forwards and backwards and forwards it can make it a lot harder. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just maybe a couple more. What -- I get what you are saying. What's your time frame of when you think you will reach that destination? Like how -- and maybe it would help -- I'm more financially oriented, so I tend to think about things in financial matrix. If there is different matrix I'm happy to hear. Like what's a great cost per ride that you have now maybe in a more mature part of the system, like in Boise? I would be really curious. Like what's your best cost per ride area? Like what could we get to one day? I would be curious about that. And, then, yeah, just talk about time frame and -- and how long we should expect to sort of stick with this and keep trying, because if -- and, you know, in fairness, the special services really are a little different; right? So, I'm kind of -- if I take like around 880,000 dollars, if I back out the special services, if I just divide that by -- I think riders originating in Meridian I'm getting to a cost per ride in the 30 dollar plus range. That just feels really high to me. So, I just want to like have some context for that and understand if the request is please stick with us, like how -- how long would that be before we -- you know, we will see improvement? Hunt: A couple quick comments on that. When you are talking about the current boarding, the trips in Meridian were just for the nine months. So, that 15,000 -- you would factor that up to a full year. So, you are talking about 20,000'ish. And, then, within most of those trips are actually going outside of Meridian. So, a lot of those trips on the 40 and the 45 they are getting on in Meridian and they are going either to Boise or to Nampa. So, when you talk about boardings, which is what you are looking at, you are seeing one half of those trips. So, if -- if you talk about the -- which is one of the problems when you are talking about trying to look at just the impact of a single jurisdiction when you have got service that connects multiple jurisdictions. So, let's say you have got 20,000 boardings in Meridian. They go external. You got 20,000 boardings in Boise that are coming to Meridian. So, all of those trips are of use to Meridian residents and so now you are talking about instead of 30 dollars a ride, it's maybe closer to 15 dollars a ride on getting both the trip out of Meridian and the trip back to Meridian; right? And when we talk about boarding -- to your second question when you talk about boardings -- cost per boarding in a more mature market in Boise -- well, actually, system wide our cost per boarding is about 11'ish dollars per boarding and so at 15 we are getting close'ish to -- well, I mean you are still quite a ways from the -- the average and you are pulling that up, but that's -- that's where we are at. So, Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 17 of 26 something about ten dollars -- ten dollars or less per boarding is a -- is a good number for our region. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I guess I just have one request after this meeting, which is if you all wouldn't mind take -- take your time, but if you could follow up with me on your math on that and so we can get synced up there, because I'm not sure I'm totally tracking with you. I would like to drill down into that a bit more. I just -- I have to have some context for -- in a really tight year with competing priorities what are the matrix and if the request is stick with us I think a little bit more on that how long and kind of what are the milestones that -- that we are trying to see along the way, so I can say, okay, maybe this cost per ride is not what I want, but I can stomach it, because these are the milestones I'm going to be seeing and, then, I can measure and track where we are at on those milestones. So, that's just coming for me. But that would really help me. Clegg: Yeah. I really appreciate that. And, by the way, I want to point out that there is a mistake in this. That 17.1 should be green, it shouldn't be red. That's -- that's an increase in ridership in Meridian. I don't know how that happened. I just realized it last time we went through. I think maybe I can get at your other question. If there are others I can take those first with this -- Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: I think we had a couple more that were -- I had some that related to this very topic. Councilman Overton. Overton: So, a little different perspective. Clegg: Okay. Overton: When you -- go back to that slide that had the numbers. Clegg: Sure. Will do. There we go. Overton: And I'm going to look at this from a totally different perspective. Not money, but vehicle trips through our city, because we are constantly looking for ways that we can reduce vehicle trips through our city and if I understand this correctly, that 15,000 over 12 months would be 20,000 vehicle trips annually -- not happening in our city that are originating in our city. But further than that, if we have 41 percent of all the ridership coming through our city, then, 41 percent of 12 months of your total boardings by route is a much bigger number of people that we are not having driving through our city that are taking Valley Regional Transit and I think it's hard for us sometimes to quantify a dollar amount on what that's worth to reduce that traffic on our roadways. Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 18 of 26 Clegg: Yeah. Well, you bring up a good point. I -- you know, we often look at transit as a subsidy, because what you pay for with transit is the operating. What you pay for with roadways is the capital and, then, people use that facility that you have just provided for them with their own capital to operate and use it. But that comes with a cost both to the public and, then, on the maintenance of the capital project that you just built and so the other -- the other interesting thing that I have been thinking a lot about -- we often say, well, you know, roadway use is a user fee, because we have gas tax and that's true at the state level or the federal level, but as you know at the local level most of the local roadways come through property tax. They don't come from a user fee. And so, in fact, there is also a really pretty significant subsidy, especially at the local level, on our roadway system. I don't know how you make that comparison. I haven't quite figured that one out yet. If anybody is smart enough to I would love to hear it. But I do think, you know, the point is transit is really the only way -- proven way to reduce congestion. You can build more roads all you want, but, typically, what happens when you build more roads is you get more trips and when you build more transit you also get more trips and that means less trips on the road, so -- thank you. Overton: So, Mr. Mayor, just a quick follow up. I have done the math. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: So, if we take the 73,934 boardings by route that's nine months of data, move it to 12 months, and, then, only count 41 percent of that that would be what we consider traveling through our city, that's over 40,000 vehicle trips per day not going through our city in personal vehicles. Clegg: Yeah. Simison: Not a day. Not a day. Yeah. Because -- again, I think we all look at numbers and try to understand them, what -- what -- what it means, because I look at it and say boardings in Meridian only, that could be the same one hundred people if -- you know, for the entire year using this facility if they were doing it every single day to and from work today so -- and I know that you probably haven't -- you have some data that tells you how many repeat riders and, you know, versus -- Clegg: Unique riders. Simison: Yeah. Unique riders and some of that has some definite -- I think important information as well that -- that could be shared. But the -- you know, the boarding -- that's kind of where I was going. Just look at the boardings in Meridian only. Any idea -- any data on those that are unique versus -- are we talking about one hundred people boarding in Meridian for the year or are we talking about 5,000 people boarding in Meridian with three of them doing it -- Clegg: We do have some ways at getting at that, depending on if they use the app to pay or not use the app to pay and I can certainly dig into it. I don't have it -- Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 19 of 26 Simison: I think that would be some good information just to get some idea about how people are using it from that standpoint. Clegg: It might be a projection based on what numbers we do have, but we could come up with something. Simison: Okay. Clegg: And I would be happy to follow up, Council Member Strader, and really dig into those numbers. So, longer term here is what I have been thinking. So, when I was a city council member at the city of Boise I recognized this. Every year, we come, we have that we don't know how much it's going to be. We don't know what it's for. And I helped the city and VRT work out a longer term memorandum of understanding that sort of set a floor and it was a growing floor, because in their case it's based on a percentage. You have an example with your Arts Commission where it's based -- based on a per population basis and it -- what it means is that you can align your current service, maintenance and expansion plans on an agreed upon expectation and it doesn't mean that you are tied to paying us that amount. Obviously, there is the non- appropriation clause in the Idaho constitution. Neither one of us wants to violate that and so the agreement also identifies how to make changes in it, but it does it in a way that provides some public input. Provides us the ability to give you input and you the ability to ask us questions, so that we don't face what we face with some of our other partners, which is in the middle of a budget workshop and we have got to find 200,000 dollars somewhere. Gosh, it looks like we could just pull it from here. That will work and nobody really has any understanding of the impact of that and so by doing this in a longer term agreement we can identify that process which makes it more predictable for all of us, including their public. And, then, it also would outline communications. So, on a regular basis we provide certain communications with the city of Boise based on this and so we could, you know, individualize those for Meridian. What are the things you are interested in hearing from us on a more regular basis? We just heard that every quarter you would like to hear an update from the healthcare trust. Maybe, you know, similar to that. What could we do to help and so it helps those surprises in the middle of the budget season for us -- remember that we are -- we are subject to 15 annual budgets and 15 annual budget processes and so if there is a change in July, there is not much we can do about it, except be surprised and figure out what service we can cut or what corners we can cut. So, it helps with that. It helps you and us both understand what the upcoming capital needs are and expectations. Gives us an opportunity to perhaps smooth them. I will talk about that a little bit in the next slide. Perhaps a strategy to address growth if you use a population basis or percentage, the communication process, and it allows both our staffs to have a little more certainty in the advance planning for the budget, rather than waiting for -- well, what is it you are going to ask for this year? And if you know six months in advance that that's going to be a problem we can start those conversations now, if that makes sense. On the capital side you mentioned that capital isn't as big a problem and sometimes it isn't. So, maybe it makes more sense not to include capital in the agreement, but to include an agreement that you will -- here is the expected capital costs over the next number of years and -- Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 20 of 26 and you understand those and are willing to step up to those or maybe you would rather have it not be lumpy, because capital costs are sometimes you buy a lot of busses. Sometimes you do a facility maintenance -- big -- big project. Sometimes, you know, this or that happens. We have a five year plan, just like most do, and so we know what most of those are coming out and it's not smooth. It's like this. So, we can either smooth that out or not smooth that out if we have an agreement and it -- but I think it allows both of us to plan maybe a little more predictably what that might be. So, that's what I have today. I know it's a tough budget year. To your question about what do you think? How many years would this be? You can see the color of my hair. I have made a commitment to be here for the next five years. Beyond that I don't think I'm going to be here, so my goal is to have all of this done well before I'm done and I am working hard to make sure that we can get some predictability in this process and build the ridership that we know that this region really needs to solve some of the congestion problems we are facing and that I think the people in this region are hungry for as I'm hearing them talk about it. So, hope -- hope that makes sense to you. We are making the request for the same amount this year as we had last year. We do see growing ridership. We promised 20 percent increase in ridership with the service change. You guys are at 17.1 percent in the first year and we said that would be year two. So, we are actually pretty excited that you are ahead of the curve in terms of ridership growth based on the changes that we made. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, any additional questions, comments? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you, Elaine. I just want to say thank you for your perseverance. You have had a vision as long as I have known you and have just figured out different ways to work toward something this valley needs. The look has changed over time. I'm seeing more riders on the benches near me. I'm seeing the on- demand vehicles out and about and to me that's a good sign, that it is being used and you are making progress. So, keep up the great work. Thank you. Clegg: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Elaine, I echo Council Woman Little Roberts' comments. I think you and your team have done a pretty admirable job. I was reviewing your presentation from last year and had come prepared with some questions and your presentation addressed most of them. The ones that I am kind of curious about -- and it speaks a little bit to Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 21 of 26 Council Member Strader's questions. What are you and your team doing to look at automating your fleet? I think that we are two or three years away from that tipping point of shifting away from driver assisted transportation to driverless transportation and to me I see that as, again, also a tipping point in the affordability of making -- in your -- again we have just discussed the cost of health insurance. We want to make sure that we are paying all of our employees a fair and equitable wage and that you want to do the same for your team and that really comes at a price. So, what are your -- kind of you and your team doing to kind of be forward looking and what is the future of transit in the Treasure Valley? Does it include drivers or do we shift to a -- a -- you know, an automated service? Clegg: That's a good question. I wish I had enough money to answer it. I probably don't. My reaction to that is transit will include autonomous features and they will be growing probably relatively quickly to the level four'ish autonomy in the next three to five years. The City of Austin just completed a pilot where their electric busses all come into the yard. The driver gets out, the bus goes and fuels. The bus goes and parks. The bus comes in the morning and starts and is ready for the driver all by itself, because in the yard you can do the optical reader path that the bus follows. There is no other traffic. It's really easy to do that. They think they are going to save -- in their case -- they have a much bigger system than us -- millions of dollars a year in operator costs, wages, because those operators have almost an hour a day on -- on both ends, where they are not required to do all the moving around of the bus. So, I certainly see those kinds of things relatively quickly. On bus rapid transit routes or higher capacity routes I think there is a real possibility, depending on what kind of roadway infrastructure we have on those routes, to also have those optical reader paths that the bus will likely mostly follow. You will still need a driver on board I believe. The other thing about -- as I look at public transportation, the driver provides much more than just driving the bus. They greet the passengers. If something happens in the bus they take care of that. And so I think you are still going to need that person on board and it's the ability to move a lot of people together that makes for the efficiency of busses. So, you know, as we get to that more people on the bus together you get more efficient, but it also means you have greater need to make sure that there is a body on board who can take care of problems that might happen and they are not safety problems typically, especially in our region. There is a perception that -- that busses are not very safe, even in regions where there are some safety issues on busses, personal safety issues, bus travel is still much, much safer than car travel. We -- we kill less than a hundred people a year and cars kill 40,000 people a year; right? So, I mean I hate to use those words, but if that's the way you are going to look at it that's -- busses are very very safe, but the security of having that person on board to take care of problems if they arise is I think going to be -- continue to be a big thing regardless of the propulsion and the guiding of the bus, if that makes some sense. So, yes, we are leaning into that. I think in the yard is going to be the place we will use it first and I think there is some real possibilities of -- of some savings there. We are already talking about some savings in our Caldwell facility, not autonomous at this point of how to fuel those busses. Right now it's not a very efficient process and we are -- we are talking about a process that we think is going to cut an hour and a half every two days out of staff wages to get those busses fueled. So, yes, Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 22 of 26 technology is going to help us all along the way. I don't see fully autonomous on any rubber wheel vehicle, including individual cars. I think the level four is going to be adopted pretty quickly, but I think we are still a ways away from fully autonomous from everything I have read Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Taylor. Whitlock: Elaine, thank you. I think one thing I'm really interested in is -- is how to immediately start using the ability of the ride sharing. That's a -- that's a great value for people who might want to use it. I do think -- you know, instead of envisioning a public transportation system that looked like it did 20 years ago, what is it going to look like tomorrow, five and ten years and the autonomous stuff will come along at some point. I don't know when. But in the near term I think the ability to focus resources on those high traffic areas -- and really appreciate Councilman Overton's comments, even though I usually doubt his math, but he is a cop and it's cars, so he is probably right. But I think -- I appreciate you, as an organization, trying to look more into and expanding on the idea of using ride sharing I think that's a -- I would be very supportive of that. I think that's something that having some consistent routes and some regular bus traffic and getting people to those is very helpful instead of trying to create this intricate, you know, complicated bus route system, try to figure out what the riders are. So, I very much appreciate that. I think, you know, my request would be -- one, I would appreciate what Council Woman Strader asked for in terms of the information. I would like that. Probably all of Council would. But they encourage you guys to continue to be very aggressive in thinking about how to utilize ride sharing to get people to your routes and I'm open to that conversation in terms of how that how that could look potentially in Meridian. Clegg: Great to hear. Thank you. Appreciate it. Well, thanks for having me. Thanks for letting me follow the healthcare trust and we will hope to see you soon. 24. Potential Public/Private Partnership for Sewer Line Installation Simison: Thank you, Elaine. Appreciate it. Next item up is Mr. Stewart on Item 24, potential public-private partnership for sewer line installation. Stewart: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Wait here just a moment for this presentation to come up. It's pretty short, so -- while that's coming up I can do sort of the intro. So, as the Mayor said I'm here to talk to you today about a new concept for the City of Meridian. We haven't really engaged in this type of an agreement before, but as the agenda indicates I'm just going to talk -- talk about this idea conceptually, what it entails. We are going to talk about the project that's kind of driving this discussion, but very lightly, because you guys will be hearing about that project on July 8th. So, I'm not going to go into any details about the project per se, but I want to make sure that part of the reason we came tonight is to give you guys the heads up and basically give you Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 23 of 26 some information, because they will likely refer to this discussion that we have been having with them around a public-private partnership in that hearing and we wanted to make sure that you weren't caught off guard by that. We are going to talk about the important conditions that as a staff, that being Public Works, Legal, Purchasing, we have sort of incorporated into a draft agreement, as well as the developer himself, going to talk about the timing of the project and the agreement and also potentially how this might be used in the future, limitations, so forth. So, the conceptual idea here is really for the developer and the city to collaborate to advance infrastructure projects from a timing perspective in a manner that would save essentially money for both the city and the developer if we were to do these projects on our own. So, to begin with the developer came to us, talked about the concept of a public-private agreement. We hadn't -- we weren't familiar with them, so we ended up asking for some examples of public-private agreements elsewhere. We reviewed those documents. We got about five different public-private agreements, reviewed those for terms, conditions, one thing and another. Some of those were with the city of Boise. They have engaged in these types of agreements before, including with this particular developer that we are going to talk about. So, we did that review. We, then, met as a staff and talked about what conditions are important to us that we would have to have in this type of an agreement and, then, with the idea that a good agreement had to provide some win-win for both the city and also for development and with the understanding that City Council would, obviously, have the final say on whether they would enter into an agreement and what the terms and conditions of that agreement would look like. So, the project that's going to be driving this discussion around this public-private agreement is a Toll Brothers project. It's called Dayspring. It's located just southeast of the intersection of Ustick and McDermott Road. It's on the agenda, as I mentioned, for July 8. This particular project doesn't have any access to sewer without a significant off-site sewer extension, which is the nexus for the public-private agreement. The city has in our current CFP to build a segment of this off-site sewer in 2028. It's the McDermott trunk sewer that comes south down McDermott Road. It's currently located about a half a mile north of the intersection of Ustick and the old McDermott alignment. Our intention in 2028 is to extend that down to the intersection with Ustick. The developer, whoever they are, would, then, be required to extend that line to the east down Ustick Road and that hasn't changed and that's actually not part of the agreement. The line that's going down Ustick Road is not a part of the public-private agreement. It's only that segment that the city had intended to build in 2028 and I think that's important for everybody to know. The public-private agreement would -- if we decided to do it, would essentially advance that project by two years. So, it would pull it up into 2026. So, here is the -- basically the meat of the discussion. I do want to give some background and talk a little bit about historic practice. So, typically, the city does not engage in building sewer, water line extensions, except in rare cases where those are significant pieces of infrastructure, which would be nearly impossible for any development to absorb the cost and be profitable. These are for major projects for the most part and that's the McDermott trunk. It's a 30 inch diameter trunk line over 30 feet deep. When we go down that road we are wiping out an entire McDermott Road and rebuilding it. It's a huge project, very expensive and very difficult. And so there is not a developer out there that can acquire enough land to ever do that by themselves and make that work. So, the city is going to Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 24 of 26 -- had planned to do this work. So, typically, we wouldn't do this for any other type of project. So, that's just -- want to make that clear. We don't often do these types of things. So, in thinking about what those conditions were going to be, one of the first conditions that we talked to the developer about was that this project to be considered for a public-private partnership would have to be in the five year CFP. The reason for that is that anything beyond the five year time frame is too speculative. We don't know if it's actually going to happen or not. So, it has to be in the five year CFP. Another one. It would have to be bid out according to public bidding rules. So, the developer would have to follow public bidding rules, because, eventually, public money would be spent on it. The price for the work would be split 50-50. This is the advantage for the city. We have the ability to potentially get this project done for half of what it would cost us to do it if we did it by ourselves and, conversely, it's half the cost for a developer to do it if he had to do it by himself. Change orders were another issue that we wanted to talk about. The concept is that we would split any change orders on a project 50-50 up to a maximum for the city of five percent. The rationale behind that is the rule of thumb in the industry is that if you have a well-designed project and a good bidding process, that overall change orders on a project should be able to be managed below ten percent. We averaged about five percent on the projects we do as a city. We wanted to cap that so that we could ensure that if the developer didn't put together good plans and didn't bid it well and the change orders went over ten percent that he would be responsible for that and the city wouldn't be responsible for anything more than five. So, we capped that as well. The other thing that's really important for us is that the city -- the developer would actually front the entire cost of doing the project. In this case he would front the entire cost of doing the project in 2026. The city wouldn't give our contribution -- our 50 percent contribution would not be due until 2028, which is the year we had intended to do the project in the first place. The reason that's important is we currently have programmed in our rate model and in our CFP to do that project in 2028 and in our just-in-time financing model we don't have the money accrued until that time frame. So, we didn't want to have to pay for the project any sooner than we would have if we had done it and we have had this conversation with the developer and they are fine with these -- these conditions. There is -- these -- some of the other things that are in work and considered or important is that the developer would manage the design and the construction of the process. They wanted to do that. We are fine with that. They are quicker at being able to do that. They have efficiencies that they can use to make that process go faster. The city, on the other hand, our contribution initially would be to basically provide plan inspection, as well as plan review at no cost. Now, this isn't for the entire subdivision, this just for that piece of sewer line in McDermott Road. The city would have to assign a project liaison, which would be one of my project managers or project engineers to actually act as the city's connection on the project and the agreement would have to include a non-appropriation clause. So, this is -- since the city is essentially not going to pay for the project until 2028, we would have to have a non- appropriation clause, because that's a future council decision and you guys -- we can't commit to that until 2028. So, the draft agreement that we currently have has a non- appropriation clause that basically says, developer, you agree and understand that there is a risk that the city council in 2028 may not fund our share of the project and they are -- they are okay with that. They have done that with the city of Boise. They Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 25 of 26 have done that in other types of agreements with other cities of this kind and, then, just to reiterate the Ustick Road piece of the project is not a part of this public-private agreement. So, that's the meat of it. Where we currently stand is we have reviewed the examples of various public-private agreements by other agencies. We -- Toll Brothers' attorneys drafted an agreement. We took a look at that, made a bunch of changes to it. And by we I mean Public Works, Purchasing, Legal, we all reviewed the document, made a bunch of changes, sent it back to them. They looked it over with their attorneys. Sent it back to us with virtually no changes. They were fine with it. That's essentially where it sits right now. What needs to happen to keep the agreement moving is it needs the financials and we don't have those, because this project hasn't been bid -- bid out. So, what needs to happen now is on the 8th Toll Brothers is going to present their project Dayspring to you guys and if they can get the entitlements for that project they will purchase the land. Once they have purchased the land, then, they will move forward to bid the project out. They will finish the design and bid this project out. Once the project is bid we can, then, input the numbers from the bid and we can bring that agreement back to you as City Council to review and decide whether you want to support it or not. I did want us to -- I mean I assume one of the questions you might have is, okay, this is new, where is this going to be eligible in other places? How many of these are we going to start to see? So, to give you some information regarding that, currently the only projects that would be eligible in the City of Meridian would be the phases of the McDermott trunk sewer. This is one of them. There is one little short segment of sewer line, less than a quarter of a mile, of Elden Gray Street, which is just on the south side of Kleiner Park. We plan to build that in 2029. Not sure any developer is going to jump at that opportunity to do a public-private partnership for that. And, then, we have contemplated that it's somewhere out in the ten year CFP, out there at the very end of it, when the McDermott trunk sewer segments are completed, which is supposed to happen in 2032, we would start building the Victory trunk sewer. It would be about three phases of the Victory trunk sewer. That would also potentially be eligible at some point in the future. So, you can see at -- currently there is only two possibilities in the city where it could even happen and that's pretty much it. Just want to talk briefly -- just reiterate the benefits in conclusion. It advances the timing of eligible projects. Saves the cost for the city and the developer if we did it on our own. The timing of the city's expenditures match what's currently in the CFP and doesn't affect our rate model. The developer does have a risk of the non-appropriation clause, but if they are willing to do that there is -- could be potentially a lot of benefits for the city in that it could cost us basically half what it will cost if we did it on our own at a future date. I guess with that I will stand for any questions. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Mayor. Thanks. Warren, I know I have got questions. I'm sure a few other members of Council may have questions as well. What I'm going to ask, though, Warren -- we have got a public hearing that's going to start here in about ten minutes. I would like Council to have an opportunity to have a quick bite to eat before we get to that public hearing. So, if you are available I would like to continue this item to our main meeting and provide an opportunity for questions after the public hearing. Does your Meridian City Council Work Session June 25,2025 Page 26 of 26 schedule accommodate for that? I hate to put you out at the dinner hour. I'm really sorry. Just trying to make sure that we are accommodating the public hearing and I -- I know some Council Members have some questions they want to get answered before we get to it. Stewart: Sure. No. I'm fine with that. Thank you. Cavener: So, Mr. Mayor, I don't know -- Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: -- if we need an action. We will just adopt the agenda -- that we will add this item to Item No. 2 when we get to our main meeting agenda. Simison: Okay. Then do I have a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I move that we adjourn the work session. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:49 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 7-8-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 7-8-2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the June 10, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session June 10,2025 Page 15 of 15 Simison: Have a motion and a second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it, we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:07 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-24-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-24-2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the June 10, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council June 10,2025 Page 45 of 45 FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Have a good evening. Council, anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Strader: Going once. Going twice. Okay. Mr. Mayor, I move that we adjourn the meeting. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn the meeting. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:33 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-24-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-24-2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025- 0060) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-039385 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Boise,Idaho Pgs=8 cfowler 06/25/2025 08:07:13 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 Electronically Recorded _RL_ For Internal Use Only -2025-0060 Record Number: PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 24 day of June 2025 between Hubble Homes, LLC ("Grantor")and the City of Meri&a—n,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and VY'HEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or shrubs. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 1 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims ofall persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: 11vib/e l6mes uc, STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County ofAda ) This record was acknowledged before me on 5/19/25 (date) by Austin Edwards (name of individual), [complete the following l signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Hubble Homes, LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Authorized Agent (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below Notary Si� ature My Commission Expires: -.20,7 PENNY SMITH NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF IDAHO COMMISSION NUMBER 23655 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 2-16.2031 Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-24-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : SS. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-24-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires: -2 -202 Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 km E N G I N E E R I N G May 22, 2025 Prescott Ridge Subdivision No.3 Project No.22-108 City of Meridian Pathway Easement Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Pathway Easement being a portion of Lot 18, Block 1 of Peregrine Heights Subdivision (Book 68 of Plats at Pages 7026-7027,records of Ada County,Idaho) and further situated in the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 28,Township 4 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 28,which bears S00°43'55"W a distance of 2,635.29 feet from an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 28,thence following the easterly line of said Northwest 1/4, N00°43'55"E a distance of 921.07 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line, N89°16'05"W a distance of 281.41 feet to the subdivision boundary of Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 1 (Book 127 of Plats at Pages 20528-20534,records of Ada County,Idaho) being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said subdivision boundary,S39°52'06"W a distance of 14.00 feet; Thence leaving said subdivision boundary, N50°07'54"W a distance of 43.00 feet; Thence 59.51 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 79.50 feet,a delta angle of 42°53'20",a chord bearing of N28°41'19"W and a chord distance of 58.13 feet; Thence 148.59 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 71.44 feet,a delta angle of 119°10'18",a chord bearing of N66°49'48"W and a chord distance of 123.21 feet; Thence S49°02'27"W a distance of 11.27 feet; Thence 41.59 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 21.79 feet,a delta angle of 109°23'16",a chord bearing of N80°15'35"W and a chord distance of 35.56 feet; Thence 47.62 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 131.60 feet, a delta angle of 20°43'52",a chord bearing of N15°12'01"W and a chord distance of47.36 feet; Thence 78.73 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 129.69 feet,a delta angle of 34°46'58",a chord bearing of N22°13'34"W and a chord distance of 77.53 feet; Thence N39°37'03"W a distance of 50.63 feet; Thence 14.37 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 126.50 feet,a delta angle of 06°30'31",a chord bearing of N63°16'56"E and a chord distance of 14.36 feet; Thence S39°37'03"E a distance of 47.42 feet; Thence 87.23 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 143.69 feet,a delta angle of 34°46'58",a chord bearing of S22°13'34"E and a chord distance of 85.90 feet; Thence 42.55 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 117.60 feet,a delta angle of 20°43'52",a chord bearing of S15°12'01"E and a chord distance of 42.32 feet; Thence 15.23 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 7.79 feet,a delta angle of 112°04'40",a chord bearing of S81°36'17"E and a chord distance of 12.92 feet; Thence N49°02'27"E a distance of 12.42 feet; Thence 178.29 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 85.44 feet,a delta angle of 119°33'39",a chord bearing of S67°01'28"E and a chord distance of 147.65 feet; 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939 • kmengllp.com Thence 49.03 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 65.50 feet,a delta angle of 42°53'20",a chord bearing of S28°41'19"E and a chord distance of 47.89 feet; Thene S50°07'54"E a distance of 43.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 6,695 square feet, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of- way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. o���' LAtVd a � 124-L59 o 0 F PAGE 2 NORTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 28 FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 21 W. Chinden Blvd. 28 W. Wildfire Dr. �13 G I > 01 C8 C9 L6 o b c2 Q) ° 1 b o� Q �a X z 4 C" W \ N CAV �� POINT OF ,r; z 0 BEGINNING L Proposed Prescott Ridge �2 — N89'16'05"W �N m Subdivision No. 3 281.41' (TIE) I o Hubble Homes LLC I N R6991222420 � �a ;, o m / �^� o z Z z a O� N N Y 1' 3 0 I N N H Z O a Y Q 3 O a a a N POINT OF COMMENCEMENT CENTER 1/4 CORNER 0 100 200 300 SECTION 28 , km Plan Scale: 1" = 100' N E N G I N E E R I N G m 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY W BOISE,IDAHO 83713 PHONE(208)639-6939 Exhibit B - City of Meridian Pathway Easement kmengllpxom Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 DATE: May 2025 1 PROJECT: 22-108 ----------------------- �SHEET: A portion of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, 1 OF 2 I T4N., R1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho 2 I T4N., R1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho M LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD L1 S39'52'06"W 14.00' C1 79.50' 59.51' 42'53'20" N28'41'19"W 58.13' L2 N50'07'54"W 43.00' C2 71.44' 148.59' 119'10'18" N66'49'48"W 123.21' L3 S49'02'27"W 11.27' C3 21.79' 41.59' 109*23'16" N80'15'35"W 35.56' L4 N39'37'03"W 50.63' C4 131.60' 47.62' 20'43'52" N 15'12'01"W 47.36' L5 S39'37'03"E 47.42' C5 129.69' 78.73' 34'46'58" N22'13'34"W 77.53' 0 o- L6 N49'02'27"E 12.42' C6 126.50' 14.37' 6'30'31 N63'16'56"E 14.36' ui L7 S50'07'54"E 43.00' C7 143.69' 87.23' 34'46'58" S22'13'34"E 85.90' 0 C8 117.60' 42.55' 20'43'52" S15'12'01"E 42.32' a C9 7.79' 15.23' 112*04'40" S81'36'17"E 12.92' 0 3 C10 85.44' 178.29' 1 119*33'39 S67'01'28"E 147.65' 0 C11 65.50' 49.03' 42'53'20" S28'41'19"E 47.89' N N C12 126.50' 1 19.92' 54'18'51" N32'52'15"E 115.48' z C13 126.50' 53.07' 24'02'17" N78'33'21"E 52.68' N } K 3 0 0 CJ N Z Q } Q 3 x a a z a 0 rn C, 0 E N G I N E E R I N G m 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY W BOISE,IDAHO 83713 PHONE(208)639-6939 Exhibit B - City of Meridian Pathway Easement W kmengllp-com Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 i DATE: May 2025 a if PROJECT: 22108 -i SHEET: A portion of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, a 2 OF 2 I T4N., R1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho 1 �(1 S� ST L s /C r r 14 9 r 4 ssaa '�o °s000��s4o Title: Date: 05-22-2025 Scale: 1 inch= 50 feet File: Deed Plottendes Tract 1: 0.154 Acres: 6695 Sq Feet:Closure=s23.1707w 0.01 Feet: Precision=11110151: Perimeter=984 Feet 008:001=s39.5206w 14.00 Bng L.R1334w,,Delta7.53 58 015=n49.0227e 12.42 Bng=n22.1334w,Chd=77.53 016:Rt.R=85.44.Delta=]19.3339 002=n50.0754w 43.00 009=n39.3703w 50.63 Bny-s67.0128e.Chd=147.65 003:Rt.R=79.50,Delta=42.5320 010:Rt,R=126.50.Delta=06.3031 017:Lt.R=65.50.Delta-42.5320 Bn��=u28.4119w,Chd=58.13 Bng=n63.1656e,Chd=14.36 Bng=s28.4119e,Chd=47.89 00.Lt.R=71.44,Delta=119.1018 011=09.3703e 47.42 0 1 8=s50.0754e 43.00 Bng-n66.4948w,Chd=123.21 012:Rt. 1 43b9.Delta=34 .4658005=s49.0227w 11.27 Bn�s22.1334e,Chd=85.90 006:Rt.R=21.79,Delta=109.2316 01 Lt R=117.60,Delta=20.4352 Bn.-n80.1535w,Chd=35.56 Bna-s15.1201e,Chd=42.32 00 Rt.R=131.60.Delta=20.4352 01 T:Lt.R=7.79,Delta=112.0440 Bng=05.1201w,Chd=47.36 Bng=s81.3617e,Chd=12.92 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Frontline Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025-0061) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-039383 Boise,Idaho Pgs=1 cfowler 06/25/2025 08:07:13 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Frontline ESMT-2025-0061 FULL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED: Water Main Easement GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTOR: Watson Land Holdings LLC&TM Cooley LLC, INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated Nov. 15 2022 and recorded as Instrument Number 2022-093380 in the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, over and across the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS, the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby vacate, relinquish, release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 24th day of June 2025. CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis , M or 6-24-2025 illIAN'. A'T est by Cs Joh```oxa„�`'ty Clerk 6-24-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-24-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Cha&wWo-q C HARLE N E WAY Notary Signature COMMISSION No. 67390 My Commission Expires:_3-28-2028_ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Version 01/01/2020 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 Emergency Access Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025-0062) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-039384 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 cfowler 06/25/2025 08:07:13 AM Prescott Ridge Subdivision o.3 CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 g Electronically Recorded For Internal use Only ES -2025-0062 Record Number: PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 24 day of June 20 25 between Hubble Homes, LLC ("Grantor")and the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); I E WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit " attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. O HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. GRANTORTHE covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or shrubs. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. E GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: Hubble ioov5, ae- STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County ofAda ) This record was acknowledged before me anij e 4jd date) by Austin Edwards (name of individual), [complete thefollowing ifs gning in'a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Hubble Homes, Lt_C (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Authorized Agent (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below PENNY SMITH NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF IDAHO fn2'{� COMMISSION NUMBER 23655 Notary Signa� ee MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 2-162031 My Commission Expires:_ 7 ^am Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-24-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-24-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires: -2 -202 Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 km E N G I N E E R I N G June 4,2025 Prescott Ridge Subdivision No.3 Project No. 22-108 City of Meridian Pathway Easement Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Pathway Easement being a portion of Lot 18, Block 1 of Peregrine Heights Subdivision(Book 68 of Plats at Pages 7026-7027,records of Ada County,Idaho)and further situated in the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 28,which bears S00°43'55"W a distance of 2,635.29 feet from an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 28,thence following the easterly line of said Northwest 1/4,N00"43'55"E a distance of 1,543.85 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line,N89°16'05"W a distance of 587.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence 10.05 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 60.00 feet,a delta angle of 09°35'39", a chord bearing of N84°3742"W and a chord distance of 10.04 feet; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of 15.00 feet; Thence N00°3429"E a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence S89°2531"E a distance of 25.00 feet; Thence 500°34'29"W a distance of 105.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 2,628 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of- way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. c� �C,1S TE 4 a 12459 Q w OF ti4� 6 . Lf.yo7-S 5725 North Discovery Way + Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939• kmengllp.com NORTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 28 CURVE TABLE FOUND ALUMINUM CAP \ 21 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BRG I CHORD 28 W. Chinden Blvd. C1 60.00' 10.05' 9'35'39" N84'37'42'V 10.04' Parcel A of ROS No. 13704 LINE TABLE (Portion of Lot 18, Block 1 LINE BEARING DISTANCE Peregrine Heights Subdivision I g � L1 N89'25'31'1N 15.00' L-2 S89'25'31"E 25.00' L2 r �F O u0 O I L O O ^i ) f'4 N Proposed Prescott Ridge M ! Subdivision No. 3 z POINT OF I Hubble Homes, LLC BEGINNING I N� R6991222420 . N89.16'05'W ►� _ CIDo: 3 L1 C1 587.77' (TIE) "'6 mo c w u- u-)o P a m ;� IZz OR I s ° Y M u m 9 m Z M 9 W POINT OF COMMENCEMENT `3 CENTER 1/4 CORNER Q SECTION 28 a Z N 0 2 0 50 100 150 m Plan Scale:1"=50' mE N G I N E E R I N G 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAV BOISE,IDAHO 83713 PHONE(209)639-6939 Exhibit B - City of Meridian Pathway Easement kmengllp.mm Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 3 DATE: Iu n�02i PROJECT: 22.108 SHEET: A portion of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, 1 OF 1 T4N., R1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho a � 25.00 r 589°25'31"c _U O � C 0 0 c O I n89°25'31'w 15.00 1' Title: Date: 06-03-2025 Scale: 1 inch=20 feet File: Deed Plottendes Tract 1: 0.060 Acres: 2628 Sy Feet:Closure=n07.5453e 0.00 Feet: Precision>l/999999: Perimeter=261 Feet OBOng-r&,37°°°'�d-1104 9 003=n00.3429e 105.00 005=s00.3429w 105.84 002=n89.2531w 15.00 004=s89.253le 25.00 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Aviation Subdivision Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025-0065) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-039386 Boise,Idaho Pgs=10 cfowler 06/25/2025 08:07:13 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Aviation Subdivision ESMT-2025-0065 FULL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED: SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTOR: AVIATOR PARK LLC INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated APRIL 05 , 2023 and recorded as Instrument Number 2023- 019373 in the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, over and across the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS, the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby vacate, relinquish, release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 24th day of June,2025. CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis ayor 6-24-2025 (�L'1 _� SF,AL Attest by C s Johns.°";° '`ty Clerk 6-24-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-24-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. C HARLE N E WAY Notary Signature COMMISSION No. 67390 My Commission Expires:_3-28-2028 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Version 01/01/2020 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2023-019373 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=9 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 04/05/2023 08:05 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO NO FEE Project Name(Subdivision): AVIATION SUBDIVISION Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: ESMT-2023-0030 Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one easement ofthis type. (See Instructions for additional information). SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 4th day of April_ 2023 between Aviator Park LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors,assigns,heirs,personal representatives,purchasers,or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: L J SON STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 3/I�1(2�— (date) by airrU LTG�N Soh-- (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a reprelentative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Aviator ParkLLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: MEMBER (type of authority such as officer or trustee) NODL nQ1*-a �1�. V 111 li� k l COMMISSION 1l20204204 378 NOTARY PUBLIC Notary S ignature STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION E*IRES 11/16r2026 My Commission Expires: ], Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN An o rt E. S* iso , Mayor 4-04-2023 � SEAL Attest by C ris Johns'�ity Clerk 4-4-2023 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 4-4-2023 (date) by Robert E. S i to i s o n and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. CHARLENE WAY Qno,A�olhcqL" COMMISSION No. 67390 Notary Signature NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission E ires: 3-28-2028 STATE OF IDAHO Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AVIATION SUBDIVISION A portion of the West% of the Southwest%of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise-Meridian, City of Meridian, ADA County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16,Townships 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise-Meridian, from which the%corner common to said Sections 9 and 10 bears North 0°38'55" East, 2653.02 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 10, North 0°38'55" East, 1621.66 feet to the south boundary line of the railroad right-of-way; thence on said south boundary line, South 88°26'12" East, 495.23 feet to the westerly boundary,thence South 00°36'35" West, 102.71 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 88°47'03" East, 162.12 feet to a point on a curve on the easterly boundary of the proposed ACHD right-of-way; Thence along said right-of-way a distance of 25.13 feet along the arc of a 55.00'foot radius non-tangent curve right, said curve having a central angle of South 26°10'49" West and a long chord bearing South 35°23'15" West a distance of 24.91 feet to a point; Thence leaving said right-of-way boundary North 88°47'03" East, 147.90 to a point; Thence South 00°36'35" East 20.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. This easement contains 3,065 square feet(0.070 acres) more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER MAIN EASEMENT#1 AVIATION SUBDIVISION A portion of the West% of the Southwest%of Section 10,Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise-Meridian, City of Meridian, ADA County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16,Townships 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise-Meridian, from which the%corner common to said Sections 9 and 10 bears North 0°38'55" East, 2653.02 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 10, North 0°38'55" East, 1621.66 feet to the south boundary line of the railroad right-of-way;thence on said south boundary line, South 88°26'12" East, 495.23 feet to the westerly boundary of Aviation Subdivision, thence continuing South 88°26'12" East 824.15 feet along the south boundary line of the railroad right-of-way to the easterly boundary of Aviation Subdivision, thence South 00°36'35" East 514.83 feet to the southern boundary of Aviation Subdivision,thence North 89°15'50" West 61.67 feet along the south boundary line of Aviation Subdivision to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 00°44'10" East, 56.05 feet to a point on a curve on the Southern boundary of the proposed ACHD right-of-way; Thence along said right-of-way a distance of 40.22 feet along the arc of a 455.00' foot radius non- tangent curve right, said curve having a central angle of South 5°03'54"West and a long chord bearing South 84°52'31" West a distance of 40.21 feet to a point; Thence leaving said right-of-way boundary North 00°44'10" East, 51.95 to a point; Thence along the southern boundary line of Aviation Subdivision North 89°15'50"West 40.00 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. This easement contains 2,160 square feet(0.049 acres) more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER MAIN EASEMENT#2 AVIATION SUBDIVISION A portion of the West% of the Southwest%of Section 10,Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise-Meridian, City of Meridian,ADA County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16,Townships 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise-Meridian, from which the%corner common to said Sections 9 and 10 bears North 0°38'55" East, 2653.02 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 10, North 0°38'55" East, 1621.66 feet to the south boundary line of the railroad right-of-way; thence on said south boundary line, South 88°26'12" East, 495.23 feet to the westerly boundary of Aviation Subdivision, thence continuing South 88°26'12" East 824.15 feet along the south boundary line of the railroad right-of-way to the easterly boundary of Aviation Subdivision, thence South 00°36'35" East 514.83 feet to the southern boundary of Aviation Subdivision,thence North 89°15'50" West 206.14' feet along the south boundary line of Aviation Subdivision to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 12°38'34"West, 22.29 feet to a point on the Southern boundary of the proposed ACHD right-of-way; Thence along south boundary of said right-of-way South 69°58'46" West, 61.18 to a point; Thence leaving said right-of-way boundary South 89°15'50" East, 62.36 to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING. This easement contains 667 square feet(0.015 acres) more or less and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. EXHIBIT B N CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AVIATION SUBDIVISION 1/4 LOCATED IN THE WI/2 OF THE SWl/4 OF SECTION 10,T.3N.,RAW.,B.M., S.9 S.10 ADA COUNTY,IDAHO SCALE 1"=100' sas°2s'12"E CURVE TABLE 0 49523 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD c1 25.13' 55.00' 26'10'49" S35'23'15"W 24.91' S00°36'35"W 102.71' N88°47'03"E 162.12' IRPOB � � ------ — \ S00°36'35"E _ W TOPEKA STREET 30-A S.F. N88°47'03"E 147.90' 0.070-ACRE i z� Z � W LOS ALAMOS IN a ry I I I 11 ��v — mLL w co 11 Vl O N \ 1 GoZ ° I I'< I PROPOSED z fp I I AVIATION SUBDIVISION \� / S S � A�LnNE m l I z \�I S.9 •S.15 S.10 I I I \ \ Z I S.16 0 rz Q II — — - co I WSA!MAFE nxivs W N CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER MAIN EASEMENT#1 AVIATION SUBDIVISION 1/4 LOCATED IN THE WI/2 OF THE SWI/4 OF SECTION 10,T.3N.,RAW.,B.M., S.9 S.10 ADA COUNTY,IDAHO SCALE 1"=100' s88°26'12'E CURVE TABLE a 49523 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD C1 40.22' 455.00' 5'03'54" S84'52'31"W 40.21' N88°26'12"W 824.15' - — - - — — - — _ __ _ i - __ WTOPEKA STREET \. _ °s Ib Lo z 4M� 1 W LOS ALA.MOS LN Q tp I I I I z (PRIVAT _ Lo u- w I I �_ co M I � Z 1\ Y � CD ro $ I la I PROPOSED z p I AVIATION SUBDIVISION m l I y I \ \\\ W S tAPT A LANE S.9 S.10 U) 2 I I , 2160 S.F. S.15 J 0.049-ACRE S.16 O ti WSANTA Lu pp C1 I / N00°44'10"E N00°44'10"E RPOB N89°15'50"W 61.67' N CITY OF MERIDIAN WATER MAIN EASEMENT#2 AVIATION SUBDIVISION 1/4 LOCATED IN THE WI/2 OF THE SWl/4 OF SECTION 10,T.3N.,R.1 W.,B.M., S.9 S.10 ADA COUNTY,IDAHO SCALE 1-100' S88°26'12"E 495.23 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD N88°26'12"W 824.15' — — I W TOPE"STREET \ 0 Z M I W Los ALAMOs EN Q I I I I z LL1 N � - CR W m Lo co I� I III gg ---�I I 1 1 " O PROPOSED p ? I I AVIATION SUBDIVISION O I I \ \\\\ wsnxrAF s.s I s.10 S.16•S.15 WSANTAEEDE �'ro \ \ 667S.F. -� by \ \\ 0.�ACRE— Lu v 2 y S69-58-46"W 61A8' N12'3934"W — 22.29' I —— / RPOB S89°15'50"W 62.36' N89015'50"W 206.14' E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Addison Circle Subdivision (FP-2025-0004) by Tamee Crawford, Centurion Engineers, Inc., located at 4535 N. Black Cat Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: 6/10/2025 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: 6/24/2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF SEVEN (7) ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0004 BUILDING LOTS AND ONE (1) ) COMMON LOT ON 1.87 ACRES OF ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL LAND IN THE R-8 ZONING ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT DISTRICT FOR ADDISON CIRCLE ) SUBDIVISION. ) BY: CENTURION ENGINEERS, ) INC. ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on June 10, 2025 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) I 1-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING ADDISON CIRCLE SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ADDISON CIRCLE FP-2025-0004 Page 1 of 3 2025, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 3/21/2025, by JOSEPH D. CANNING, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 2," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated June 10, 2025, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ADDISON CIRCLE FP-2025-0004 Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 24th day of June, 2025. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 6-24-2025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ADDISON CIRCLE FP-2025-0004 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A STAFF REPORT E COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 6/10/2025 �" -, DATE: IiP� 0 , _ TO: Mayor&City Council J I FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner Hi q F-FFI 7171141 r�FF 208-884-5533 ki�',0 61, r LI[Aq 4� SUBJECT: FP-2025-0004 � Addison Circle Subdivision-FP � i LOCATION: 4535 N. Black Cat Rd. in the NE 1/4 of Section 33,TAN.,R.1W. (Parcel Legend #SO433110460) 0 Project Location Area of Impact ' i= City Limits OAnalysis ' L PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of seven(7)building lots and one (1)common lot on 1.87-acres of land in the R- 8 zoning district. IL APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Tamee Crawford,Centurion Engineers,Inc.-2323 S.Vista Ave., Ste. 206, Boise,ID 83705 B. Owner: Collin Hunter,Bear Hunter Holdings-4429 Tails Down Rd.,Tetonia,ID 83452 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the preliminary plat(H- 2024-0040)and associated conditions of approval as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. There is the same number of buildable lots and common open space area as shown on the approved preliminary plat. Therefore, Staff finds the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. Conditions of approval that haven't been complied with from the preliminary plat are carried over to the final plat and included in Section VI below. Page 1 IV. DECISION A. Staff- Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(date: 5/13/2024) iuu vrceaz A�a aoti w��•e�w x�ro.�s,o mmne,unRm - n,_ f. JNI'S1133NION3 NOIIINN3J yo'a ld'o m +� au n mur•mrua•.n wxv r w 1pptl V sake oix aai os z�yvm.nscxa 'R �Y uav�n�pgng a;a�l�uos Uy .. .wick uAr.�Girl v,,.A 1 mld.4eulmlla,d wRFY•aM �n-� r • L d N +�f—• L____. q t}_e'_______-I__-___._._._.___.I___.._��-- I 1j IF h i p 77 ° � n� Abe @@ @F4 :a @s.iYli. s:ea$;➢e9: e § pi , @ ®R_ a• �a9 F ➢ aea•p i; ➢➢ ➢sp; 'si ° g➢i:.°aig � 8 @--^ @i �i�YBIs➢�igp �is➢9➢Aa➢9➢ �� Ig�91��°e lY �tl ��@gad➢§�$1➢Ytl� .Y➢ �a 4i i Y 'i@i j�➢aa➢ass ➢ ' �° @ ��°•p;➢�➢i`• �: 9 ➢ '➢9p� ��"� gg i1 �1➢ 4ge ,� nt � @@ern@Rp °➢"�° ➢@ ��° ➢pi 2$"$��iY ➢ia:;SIHnI" � 3���@se@ RE � F � g ➢° 9 !!s➢ s➢@�e�lll�l�ll�l@lYes�s�±eiels'Ri i Ya°RBI➢sl.g Y i rT� ® ll� I` �' i a y e�@ a 9 m�p@ nop @ ➢ @a� �_ FIR 1'�� iC 3� RBy a➢@ � Sep i3 a aaa a i. ere I rs es� � ...:.,.. —,_ � ➢1 i��5 !@� �e d,i9 7i g Ii,➢➢@ @ise➢i� ➢h11@1,1144p1 i �ts�9 i� � L��� Isa�s l"sl110 ,➢ heal1; sg @ ® I Page 2 B. Final Plat(date: 3/21/2025) Wig $ a Y x a ; 14 - g s Lam'-m tj b g$ E � N M a 1) N b ge $ e n a a ac s Ia- LA szr s� � as �^ • �O � � � � �� cy8 3S a x aE ¢ 9 Vla sia � pa G Ian p ut X �e w aroog ,ocicez aros,coms „ � ��tn .1K6 SY'CR'�V Tv+ '€ 'P1I teJ�Ifl'N !Igo A.1 Pa1dP p FV� �y It K CGOS Cy 0 — �S Y AO'KI 1„K.IVL� v YS'9Z ae1e.�� •�� a t � as __Qui K�s�_.—.__. � ■.isSo305 S34 L _L ' -�-------- nc I .aral —z —ZtRrKRSaaos—.--. € I ' L�— __ # O� man I f'aN aala-wygnS Ma"°MW .OL'BOS 315.lam y 0I F'M!wst�i i�amp0 �I r � a g € yRI gg € F� >j3 � 5 � '�b�n a 5 d �• Y � � a � � E' € ys E �. �n?sp`?s � � �� 5 i n 2 bf= Y$ $ J A s�s 11 1 1 �_7— LE Hsi 'fps oR 3'i i 88gin. .- y I o a zd a .b u s I! 3Ea"M Riau $ F yid �a�€� �S:.YWYa Eg � a E I I I Z� ., + m m m _ _ _ _ Page 3 C. Landscape Plan(&e37y275 „ ,,,. | �; � § • || || |!||| ! | | | ; 00 ,...! �: , . ||||| � | � | •���/\��\��/ ��:\a , , . , . ^ � V4\ 6 ' , e / � } . j � Page 4 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [H-2024-0040,Development Agreement Inst. 92025-015307. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2) years of City Council's approval of the preliminary plat(by December 17,2026) in accord with UDC 11-611-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement shall be signed and notarized. 4. The final plat shown in Section V.B prepared by Centurion Engineers,Inc., stamped on 3/21/2025 by Joseph D. Canning,Centurion Engineers,Inc., shall be revised as follows: a. Note 92: Include the recorded instrument number of the CC&R's. b. Note 415: Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD license agreement. c. Correct the horizontal scale—it should be F=30',instead of 1"=60'. The revised plat shall be submitted with the application for final plat signature. 5. The landscape plan shown in Section V.C,dated 2/4/25, shall be revised as follows: a. Include calculations that demonstrate compliance with the required standards in UDC 1I- 3B-7C.3 per preliminary plat condition 93.1. Include required vs.provided number of trees and shrubs along with the percentage of lawn or other grasses requiring regular mowing that demonstrate compliance with the standards. b. Depict a 5-foot-wide detached asphalt pathway off-site to the north along N.Black Cat Rd. across Lot 14, Block 7, Oakcreek Subdivision No. 3 to the existing asphalt pathway, per development agreement provision 95.d. c. Depict fencing along the back edge of the street buffer along N. Black Cat Rd. and along the northern and southern property boundaries adjacent to common open space in adjacent developments if the existing fencing is removed,in accord with the standards in UDC 1I- 3A-7A per preliminary plat condition 43.1v. If existing fencing is not being removed, include a note stating such and include fencing height and type for new fencing being installed. d. Include how many caliper inches of trees are proposed to meet the mitigation requirement of 80 caliper inches per preliminary plat condition 93.vi. Also depict which existing trees are proposed to be removed. Submit documentation from the City Arborist stating the mitigation requirements if full mitigation is not required. e. Gravel, rock, sand, or cobble stormwater facilities are not permitted on the surface of required landscape areas, unless designed as a dry creek bed or other design feature per UDC 11-3B-I IC; revise river cobble area in street buffer accordingly. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the application for final plat signature. 6. All development shall comply with the dimensional standards for the R-8 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6. 7. The sides of homes on lots that face N. Black Cat Rd. (i.e. Lots 3 and 5, Block 1) shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g. Page 5 projections,recesses,step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement,per requirement of the development agreement. 8. The existing well on the site shall be abandoned and proof of abandonment shall be provided to the City Public Works Department.The well may be used for pressurized irrigation purposes, per requirement of the development agreement. 9. Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. Page 6 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Apex Phenomenal (FP-2025-0005), by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/2 mile east of S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JUNE 17, 2025 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: JUNE 24, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 64 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0005 LOTS, 11 COMMON LOTS AND ) ONE (1) OTHER LOT FOR ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON 16.15 ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-15 ) ZONING DISTRICT FOR APEX ) PHENOMENAL SUBDIVISION. ) BY: BRIGHTON CORPORATION ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on June 17, 2025 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) I 1-613-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING APEX PHENOMENAL SUBDIVISION, A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, B.M., CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2025, HANDWRITTEN ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR APEX PHENOMENAL FP-2025-0005 Page 1 of 3 DATE: 5/20/2025, by AARON L. BALLARD, PLS, SHEET 1 OF 6," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated June 17, 2025, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight (28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR APEX PHENOMENAL FP-2025-0005 Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight (28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 24 day of 12025. By: Robert E. Simison Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. 6-24-2025 By: Dated: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR APEX PHENOMENAL FP-2025-0005 Page 3 of 3 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Adero Mixed-Use Neighborhood (H- 2024-0068) by DevCo, LLC, located near the NWC of N. Ten Mile and McMillan Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN -:FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAWM- 1E IDIAN: AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Development Agreement Modification,Preliminary Plat and Rezone,by Laren Bailey,DevCo. Case No(s). H-2024-0068 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 10,2025 (Findings on July 8,2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 10,2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 10, 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 10,2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 10,2025,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance,established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 10,2025,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(ADERO MIXED-USE NEIGHBORHOOD MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0069 -1- reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Development Agreement Modification,Preliminary Plat and Rezone is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 10,2025,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner,and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two (2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(ADERO MI)XED-USE NEIGHBORHOOD MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0069 -2- City Code Title I I(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted,including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10,seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d)and 67-8003,an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 10,2025 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(ADERO MI)XED-USE NEIGHBORHOOD MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0069 -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 24 day of 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-24-2025 Attest: Chris Johnson 6-24-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 6-24-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(ADERO MIXED-USE NEIGHBORHOOD MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0069 -4- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (:>-WE DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 6/10/2025 Legend DATE: ® Project Location ^ ;� TO: Mayor& City Council :::Area of Impact `F a= City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 lritter@meridiancity.org - APPLICANT: Laren Bailey,DevCo I; SUBJECT: H-2024-0068 Adero Mixed-Use Neighborhood MDA, PP,RZ LOCATION: Near the NWC of N. Ten Mile and McMillan Roads in the SE'/4 of SEC 27, Township 4N,R. 1 W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Rezone of 11.18 acres of land from the R-4 and C-C zones to the R-8 zone, 35.82 acres from the L-O,C-C and C-G zones to the R-15 zone; and a portion of the C-C zone (approximately 10 acres)to the C-G zone which in total is 21.37 acres; Preliminary Plat(PP)consisting of 270 residential lots,44 commercial lots,4 office lots, 31 common lots,2 common drive lots,and 1 park lot on 69.18 acres of land in the R-8,R-15,L-O, and C-G zoning districts; AND Development Agreement modification(Inst.No. 2019-055407)to create two(2)new development agreements to develop the Adero Mixed-Use Subdivision. B. Issues/Waivers • Request for Waiver for a right-in/right-out access to Ten Mile Road: Ada County Highway District(ACHD)has a revised Traffic Impact Study(TIS)to determine if this access is warranted for the commercial development. • Revised TIS: ACHD has requested a revised Traffic Impact Study(TIS) for this application to assess the impact of the proposed commercial lots and conduct a signal warrant analysis at the Malta Drive/Ten Mile intersection prior to submitting any commercial plans or a final plat submittal. C. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezone from C-C (Community Commercial)to R-8 and R-15 (Residential)zoning districts,L-O,C-G and the preliminary plat associated with the residential and commercial development. D. Decision City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1•Land Use Description Details Mal)Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential,Office,Commercial - Existing Zoning L-O,C-C,C-G,R-4 VII.A2 Proposed Zoning R-8,R-15,L-O,C-G Adopted FLUM Designation Mixed-Use Community(MU-C),Medium Density VII.A.3 Residential Proposed FLUM Designation Mixed-Use Community(MU-C),Medium Density Residential Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 9/24/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 10/16/2024 Site posting date 5/1/2025 Table 3:Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.H • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access N.Ten Mile Road - • Traffic Level of Service See Figure 2:ACHD Summary Matrix ITD Comments Received Yes/Letter IV.I Meridian Fire No Comments Meridian Police IV.0 • Distance to Station 6.2 Miles and 2.9 Miles • Response Time Priority 3:4:06 Priority 2:7:38 Priority 1: 12:59 Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site • Impacts or Concerns No Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site • Impacts or Concerns No School District(s) West Ada School District—No Comments Received • Capacity of Schools Pleasant View Elementary School—650 - Star Middle School—1000 Owyhee High School— 1800 • Number of Students Enrolled Pleasant View Elementary School-747 - Star Middle School- 1014 Owyhee High School- 1887 Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received. City of Meridian I Department Report IL Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S0427417210 Date Retrieved:2025/1/29 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 1,842 Surrounding Area 355 19% Not City is & ® City Limits 2,803 1,504. ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:25.3% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 9% 9% 4% Multi-family 4D 7 ® Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 500 1000 1500 0 200 400 600 81 ■ Single-family ® Multi-family City of Meridian I Department Report IL Community Metrics 2.00 2,000 Single-family 01 1.50 1,500 Residential U Parcel Diversity y 1.00 1,000 U 0Parcel Count .r40.50 � 0.49 � 500 L 0 0.24 0.19 0.12 M Average Acres 0.00 0 CL R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 10.00 0 8.59 Residential Net Density u Q 5.00 05.28 4.85 � (D4.09 02.05 0.00 Dwelling Units / Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Notes: See VIIL Additional Notes& Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts. Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH) Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service ' McMillan Road N/A Minor Arterial 685 Better than 'E" *Ten Mile Road 1,507-feet Minor Arterial 783 Better than "E" *Gondola Drive 334-feet Residential 101 Better than"Y Collector *Bolsena Way 590-feet Local NIA N/A *Acceptable level of service for a three-lane minor arterial is`E" (720 VPH)_ *Acceptable level of service for a five-lane minor arterial is"E"(1,540 VPH). *Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is"D"(425 VPH)_ *ACHD does not set level of service thresholds for local streets. 2. Average Daily Traffic Count(VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. • The average daily traffic count for McMillan Road west of Ten Mile Road was 12,003 on November 16', 2023. • The average daily traffic count for Ten Mile Road south of US 20126(Chinden Boulevard)was 20,182 On August 22"d, 2024. • The average daily traffic count for Gondola Drive west of Bolsena Way was 1,699 on November 16', 2023_ • There are no current traffic counts for Bolsena Way_ Notes: See VIII. Additional Notes & Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report IL Community Metrics Figure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService . . Ready Marginal Caution o��� o��� �a �y� �'�� �a`� p��Je 4a� Q-e5Q �5Q � L°tea oo� oo� Qa Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report IL Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview A significant portion of the proposed development is located within an area designated as Mixed Use by the Comprehensive Plan. These designations are intended to promote a complementary blend of compatible land uses within a compact geographic area,ensuring that services and amenities are easily accessible and convenient for residents,employees,and visitors alike. The Comprehensive Plan emphasizes the importance of both functional and physical integration of land uses to foster a strong neighborhood identity,enhance the community's sense of place,and support flexible,high-quality design and development patterns. The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)designates the area proposed to be rezoned as Mixed-Use Community and Medium Density Residential. Mixed-Use Community: The purpose of this designation is to allocate areas where community- serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses,including residential,and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings. In reviewing development applications,the City will consider the following items in MU-C areas: • Development must comply with the Functional Integration principles for development in all Mixed Use areas. • Residential uses are expected to comprise between 20%and 50%of the development area, with gross densities ranging from 6 to 15 units/acre(of the residential area). • Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places should comprise a minimum of 5%of the development area are required. • Where the development site has transit available or stops are planned,an additional 15%of the site may be dedicated to residential uses. Alternatively,this bonus may be applied where the development site is within one-mile of planned transit stops or an identified employment area,and where last-mile transportation features are incorporated into the site including thoughtfully located and integrated ride share parking,commensurate with potential trip capture. Other innovations to reduce traffic and/or parking impacts and capture local trips may be considered. • Sample uses appropriate in MU-C areas include: All MU-N categories,community scale grocers,clothing stores,garden centers,hardware stores,restaurants,banks,drive-thru facilities,auto service station,retail shops,and other appropriate community-serving uses. Sample zoning includes: R-15,R-40,TN-R,TN-C,C-C,and L-O. Medium Density Residential: This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park,school,or land dedicated for public services. The proposed Adero Park Mixed-Use Neighborhood represents an infill development that completes the final phase of a larger,integrated mixed-use area. This project offers a complementary mix of land uses consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically supporting the vision of a vibrant mixed-use community. The development is designed to seamlessly connect with and enhance the surrounding neighborhoods,contributing to a cohesive and well-planned community fabric. According to the Comprehensive Plan,vibrant mixed-use communities are characterized by shared spaces that foster connection and recreation among residents,employees,and visitors. These areas serve as hubs for business,collaboration,innovation,and social interaction. The success of such communities hinges on a thoughtful balance between residential and non- City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis residential uses.Without this balance,the intended intensity and density of mixed-use areas can lead to fragmented development and unmitigated impacts. The concept of"1 st Place"(home),"2nd Place"(work),and"3rd Place" (social or recreational spaces)is central to the vitality of mixed-use environments. Access to a nearby"3rd Place"is essential for emotional and physical well-being,offering people a space to relax,connect,and recharge.While not every mixed-use area must serve all functions equally,they are expected to be more than just a place to live or work,they must contribute meaningfully to a sense of place and community. The proposed Adero Park Mixed-Use Neighborhood is ideally situated to support this vision. Surrounded by residential neighborhoods,employment centers,and recreational amenities,it embodies the key characteristics of a vibrant,integrated mixed-use community. Rezone: The applicant is requesting to rezone parcel SO427428024 which is approximately 9.20 acres from R-4 and C-C to R-8. The applicant is also proposing to rezone parcel S0427417210 approximately 59.966 acres of land currently zoned as Community Business(C-C),Limited Office (L-O)and General Retail and Service Commercial (C-G)as follows: • Approximately 35.822 acres as R-15 • Approximately 1.363 acres as L-O • Approximately 21.366 acres as C-G Table 4:Proiect Overview Description Details History AZ-05-040,PP-05-039,PP-05-040,CUP-05-041,MDA Inst.No. 111010393 Phasing Plan 5 phases Residential Units 270 units Open Space Required: 15%/Provided: 6.28 acres/16.6% Amenities Required:5 amenity points/Provided:27 amenity points Physical Features Existing park with water feature Acreage 69.18 acres Lots 270 residential, 1 existing park,31 common lots,2 common driveways,4 office lots,44 commercial lots for a total of 352 lots Density 7 du/acre B. History The subject property was part of a larger annexation completed in 2005,encompassing approximately 312.67 acres of land previously zoned RUT(Rural-Urban Transition)in Ada County.As part of the annexation request,the applicant proposed a mix of zoning designations: 35.19 acres were designated C-G(General Retail and Service Commercial District), 19.27 acres were zoned L-O(Limited Office District),and the remaining 258.21 acres were zoned R-4(Low Density Residential District). This zoning mix was intended to support a balanced community with commercial,office,and residential land uses. C. Site Development and Use Analysis The Adero Mixed-Use Neighborhood consists of the remaining 69.18 acres of land annexed in 2005. The property will be developed as a mixed-use development consisting of single-family detached residential,office and commercial. The development will be designed as follows: • Residential: The applicant is proposing the development of 270 single-family detached homes,to be constructed in four phases. To accommodate this residential component,two zoning districts are proposed: R-15 and R-8,providing a mix of lot sizes and housing options. As part of the project,the applicant is also contributing additional acreage to the City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis existing park located at Lot 46,Block 5. This contribution will fulfill the requirement outlined in the existing development agreement to establish a 10.2-acre park,enhancing recreational opportunities for the surrounding community. • Existing Bridgetower Park: The Bridgetower West Neighborhood was originally preliminarily platted under a development agreement that required the dedication of a 10.2- acre park.However,the majority of that park was never formally dedicated to the Bridgetower West Homeowners Association(HOA),and the prior approvals for the neighborhood have since expired. The Adero Park Mixed-Use Neighborhood application addresses this issue by incorporating the remaining portion of the park that was never deeded to the HOA. This application creates a clear path forward for the current property owner to record a final plat that establishes the properly sized park parcel,thereby fulfilling the original development agreement and enabling the parcel to be dedicated to the HOA. This park will not be accessible to the property owners within the Adero Park Mixed-Use Neighborhood development. 1 w • Office: The applicant is proposing the development of four office lots at the corner of Ten Mile Road and W. Malta Drive,within the area designated for L-O (Limited Office)zoning. This location was strategically selected,as it sits between the proposed Adero Park Mixed- Use Neighborhood and the existing Bridgetower West Subdivision. The applicant views this as an ideal site for office use,providing a natural transition between residential areas and supporting the overall goal of creating a balanced,integrated mixed-use environment. • Commercial: The applicant is proposing to defer development of the commercial portion of the property to a future phase,as specific end users have not yet been identified. To illustrate City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis the potential for future development,a bubble conceptual site plan has been submitted and is included in Section VII,Exhibit E. Prior to proceeding with the commercial component,the applicant will be required to submit a new development agreement application,along with updated conceptual plans that demonstrate alignment with the mixed-use principles outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The commercial portion of the property should not be rezoned or subdivided until an updated Traffic Impact Study(TIS)has been submitted,reviewed,and approved by Ada County Highway District(ACHD). At that time,the applicant must provide documentation to the City that clarifies the intended development approach for the commercial area,enabling staff to evaluate the project comprehensively and ensure consistency with transportation and land use planning goals. 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There are no existing structures on the site. The site will be developed with a mixture of single-family detached residential homes, office and commercial buildings. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant is proposing single-family detached dwellings which are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-15 zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2A-2. The future land use map identifies this area as mixed-use community. R-15 is an allowed use within the mixed-use community designation. This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of eight (8) to twelve (12)dwelling units per acre. Per UDC 11-2A-7, R-15 is considered Medium High Density. Per the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, this designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. The applicant is only proposing single-family detached homes. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents.Developments need to incorporate high- quality architectural design and materials and though�l site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways, attractive landscaping and a project identity. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.06.02E encourages and support mixed-use areas that provide the benefits of being able to live, shop, dine,play, and work in close proximity, thereby reducing vehicle trips, and enhancing overall livability and sustainability. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The preliminary plat and future development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-1 Commercial District for the Mixed-Use Community,C-G,L-0 R-8 and the R-15 zoning districts. The proposed lots and public streets for the R-15 zoning district appear to meet UDC dimensional standards per the submitted preliminary plat. The minimum lot size for the proposed preliminary is 3,040 square feet with an average lot size of 3,795 square feet. Two (2) common driveways are proposed with this subdivision. The applicant has provided common drive exhibits which demonstrate no more than three(3) units are served whereas a maximum of 4 units is allowed. The common driveway meets the minimum width of twenty (20)feet and does not exceed the maximum length of one hundred and fifty(I50)feet. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited, unless separated by a minimum five (5) foot wide landscaped buffer. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis D. Design Standards Analysis The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in 11-2A-7 for the R-8 and R-15 zoning district. Staff finds the proposed lots comply with the dimensional standards for the R-8 and R-15 zoning district. 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan 2.02.02C, Comp Plan 3.07.00, Comp Plan 3.07.OIA, UDC 11-3A-19): The property is currently vacant and zoned Community Business District(GC), General Retail and Service Commercial District(C-G) and Limited Office District(L-O). Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.02C supports infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.0 encourages compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.0IA requires all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening, transitional densities, and other best site design practices. 2. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan 2.02.00, Comp Plan 2.02.OIB, UDC 11-3G): Based on the standards in UDC Table 11-3G-3, a minimum of 15%(or 6.05-acres) of qualified open space is required to be provided within the development.An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.F, that depicts 15.6%(or 6.28-acres) of open space that meets the required quality and qualified open space standards. Based on the standards in UDC 11-3G-4A, a minimum offive (5) amenity points are required to be provided. The applicant has provided twenty-seven (27) amenity points, which is well in excess of the required amenity points. The amenities proposed are three pickleball courts, play structure, climbing dome and rocks, swing set,passive open spaces and seating areas, numerous pathways and pedestrian facilities, two dog parks and several open space areas with attractive landscaping. All common open space areas are required to be landscaped with one deciduous shade tree for every 5,000 square feet of area and include a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover per UDC 11-3G-5B.3. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.00 requires the applicant to plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.0IB requires the applicant to evaluate open space and amenity requirements for consistency with community needs and values. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets UDC 11-2A-6 requires a twenty-five(25)foot wide buffer along arterials (N. Ten Mile Road and twenty(20)foot wide buffers are required along collector roads (W. Malta Drive). The landscaping along Ten Mile Road was installed when the road was widened. The applicant will be required to remove the gravel and install landscaping that follows UDC 11-3B-7. ii. Parking lot landscaping Per UDC 11-3B-8,the applicant shall provide perimeter and internal parking lot landscaping to soften and mitigate the visual and heat island effect of a large expanse of City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis asphalt in parking lots,and to improve the safety and comfort of pedestrians. A five-foot wide minimum landscape buffer adjacent to parking,loading,or other paved vehicular use areas. The requirements include 5 ft.perimeter adjacent to streets and islands of at least 50 sq. ft.per every 12 parking spaces. The parking lot landscaping for the commercial portion of the project shall be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. The parking lot landscaping shall meet the requirements of UDC 11-3B-8 which also include a five (5)foot perimeter adjacent to streets and islands of at least fifty(50)square feet per every twelve (12)parking spaces. In. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses Per UDC 11-313-9,a landscape buffer is required in the C-N,C-C,C-G,L-O,M-E,H-E, and I-L districts on any parcel sharing a contiguous lot line with residential land use. Additionally,the comprehensive plan speaks to plazas and open space providing integration in mixed-use areas. The proposed plaza area will be a minimum of 16,000 square feet with amenities that promote transition from the residential areas to commercial uses,including,without limitation seating areas,gathering spaces,and multimodal facilities such as bicycle repair stations,workout stations,etc. Staff recommends the plaza design be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the final plat approval or with the development of the second phase of the landscape improvements. iv. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10,the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two (2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees,or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space,and when used as focal elements in landscape design. The applicant shall add a mitigation section to the landscape plan for trees that are removed meeting the criteria above. v. Storm integration Per UDC 11-313-11,the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural,effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated,well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green stormwater facilities into required landscape areas,where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. Development will be required to meet UDC 11-3B-11 for stormwater integration. vi. Pathway landscaping Landscaping for pathways shall meet the requirements outlined in UDC 11-3B-12. Staff finds the landscape plan shows the applicant meets the requirements of UDC 11-3B- 12 for pathway landscaping. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. On-street parking is also available on the proposed streets. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis i. Residential parking analysis The proposal will be required to meet the standards for parking as set forth in UDC 11- 3C-6. ii. Nonresidential parking analysis Staff cannot analyze the parking for the nonresidential portion of this application as the applicant does not have a defined development plan for the commercial portion at this time. The commercial portion of the project will be developed in phase five (S) and will be required to comply with the commercial parking standards listed in UDC Table I I- 3C-6.Non-residential parking will be evaluated with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. The parking shall comply with UDC 11-3C-6. In. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one (1)bicycle parking space is required for every twenty-five (25) vehicle parking spaces per UDC 11-3C-6G. Staff cannot analyze the bicycle parking for the nonresidential portion of this application as the applicant does not have a defined development plan for the commercial portion at this time. This will be evaluated with the submittal of certificate ofzoning compliance and design review. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Ten (10) conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed residential subdivision as shown in Exhibit VII.J. Buildings shall be designed with elevations that create interest through the use of broken planes, windows, and fenestrations that produce a rhythm of materials and patterns. Design review is not required for single-family detached structures. However, because the rear and/or sides of homes facing W. Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive will be highly visible, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding,porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from adjacent public streets. Single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. The applicant did not provide any building elevations for the commercial portion of the project. However, the building elevations shall comply with the Architectural Standards Manual, UDC, and Comprehensive Plan. This will be evaluated with the submittal of a certificate ofzoning compliance and design review applications. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. To support this policy staff recommends the applicant provide additional housing options (i.e. townhomes, single family attached) in the development. 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC H- 3A-7. 7. Parkways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-17): Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.01 C requires appropriate landscaping, buffers, and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc). Per the UDC the minimum width of parkways planted with Class II trees shall be eight(8) feet. The width can be measured from the back of curb where there is no likely expansion of City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis the street section within the right-of-way;the parkway width shall exclude the width of the sidewalk. Class II trees are the preferred parkway trees. The applicant is proposing parkways along the entrance to W. Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive of the subdivision. E. Transportation Analysis The Ada County Highway District(ACHD)reviewed the submitted application and has determined the following: Traffic Impact Study: Additional information is needed as the Traffic Impact Study(TIS)did not include the commercial portion of the property.ACHD has conditioned the project to submit a revised TIS to address the potential impacts of the commercial lots prior to submitting plans for the final plat.Additional conditions of approval may be required based on the findings of the updated traffic study. The TIS shall also include a signal analysis for the Malta Drive/Ten Mile Road intersection. Collector Street: The collector street(W. Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive) shall be developed as a three (3)lane collector street(either a 47-foot wide or 37-foot wide street section)at its intersection with Ten Mile Road within the influence area of the intersection.West of the intersection,taper the roadway to 2 lanes as follows: • Construct W.Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive as a 36-foot wide residential collector street section with 2-travel lanes,on-street bike lanes,vertical curb,gutter,a minimum 8-foot wide landscape strip and 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk; or • Construct W.Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive as a 26-foot wide residential collector street section with 2-travel lanes,vertical curb,gutter,a minimum 8-foot wide landscape strip and a minimum 10-foot wide multi-use pathway on both sides of the roadway. • The multi-use pathway will need to transition to on-street bike lanes at the intersection of W. Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive and San Vito Way. W. Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive shall be constructed as a completed street(travel lanes,curb, gutter,sidewalk and landscaping). Staff is recommending these improvements be included with Phase one(1)of the development. While the applicant is unsure of the commercial business at this time, staff is in agreement with delaying the installation of the buffers along the east side of Malta Drive/Gondola Drive. The landscape buffer on the west side of Malta/Gondola Drive shall be installed with the residential development portion of the property. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.01 C requires appropriate landscaping, buffers, and noise mitigation with new developments along transportation corridors. The landscape buffers will be installed with the inclusion of the 10 foot multi-use pathways or bicycle lanes along the collector street. The new collector road is required to connect to N. San Vito Way and N. Vicenza Way which connects to W.McMillan Road. This will provide an overall transportation connectivity to the area and hopefully prevent individuals from cutting through neighborhoods to get to these areas. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Adero 1 st Phase Improvement Area \ f� . l Bridgetower LLC Applicant proposes to Improvement Area develop in the Phase 2 Apartment Improvement Area The roadway portion to the south has to be constructed in order for the Bridgetower development to receive occupancy for any of its buildings. If the roadway section in red is not completed with Phase 1,there will be an approximate 0.12-mile gap in the transportation network in this area. If the new collector roadway does not connect at a minimum to N. Vicenza Way,residents of the proposed development will be forced to use Ten Mile Road to access the commercial businesses to the south. Additionally,the new collector will provide a direct route for residents of the southern developments,reducing the likelihood of them cutting through northern neighborhoods when dropping their children off at school. Individuals dropping off children at school will be able to use the collector as a more efficient and appropriate access route,minimizing traffic impacts on local residential streets. A private agreement stipulates that the third segment of the new collector roadway,extending from N.Vicenza Way to N. San Vito Way, shall be constructed by a separate party.However,the agreement provides the applicant with the option to complete this segment if deemed necessary to support development or ensure roadway continuity. Right-In/Right-Out Access to Ten Mile Road: The applicant is requesting a waiver for a right- in/right-out access to Ten Mile Road for the commercial portion of the development. Per the Ada County Highway District,existing driveways onto Ten Mile Road are to be closed and replaced with curb,gutter, sidewalk and landscaping. No new driveways are approved as part of this application. Other than approved with this application,direct lot access to Ten Mile Road is prohibited. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan 6.01.02B, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-311--4): Access to the property is W.Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive, the new collector road, via Ten Mile Road. Comprehensive Plan policy 6.01.02E requires the applicant to reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity. 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multiuse pathways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan, the Meridian Pathways Master Plan, the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan 2.02.0IA, Comp Plan 3.07.02A, Comp Plan 4.04.0IA, UDC 11-3A-8): A 10 foot wide detached pathway is reflected along W. Malta Drive/Gondola Drive (the internal collector)which is consistent with the alignment shown on the Pathways Master Plan. There is also a five(5)foot wide detached pathway along Ten Mile Road. Several micro pathways are reflected in providing connectivity to internal portions of the development. All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.OIA requires that new subdivision plats, require the design and construction of pathways connections, easy pedestrian and bicycle access to parks,safe routes to schools, and the incorporation of usable open space with quality amenities. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.02A requires pedestrian circulation plans to ensure safety and convenient access across large commercial and mixed-use developments. Comprehensive Plan policy 4.04.OIA ensures that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system. Together; these policies ensure that all new projects prioritize safe pedestrian access and integrate seamlessly with existing pathways. 4. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multiuse pathways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan,the Meridian Pathways Master Plan,the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. A ten (10)foot wide detached pathway is reflected along W. Malta Drive/Gondola Drive which is consistent with the alignment shown on the Pathways Master Plan. There is a five (5)foot wide detached sidewalk along Ten Mile Road which is consistent with Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. Several micro pathways are reflected providing connectivity to internal portions of the development.As mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan analysis above; to improve more direct pedestrian connectivity, staff is recommending additional micro pathway connections. 5. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. 6. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): There are no private streets proposed for this development. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 7. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Dead end streets No streets or series of streets that ends in a cul-de-sac or a dead end shall be longer than five hundred(500) feet except as allowed in subsection(b)of this section. The City Council may approve a dead-end street up to seven hundred fifty(750) feet in length where an emergency access is proposed; or where there is a physical barrier such as a steep slope,railroad tracks,an arterial roadway,or a large waterway that prevents or makes impractical extension; and where a pedestrian connection is provided from the street to an adjacent existing or planned pedestrian facility. Cul-de-sac streets may serve a maximum of thirty(30)dwelling units. The applicant is proposing a cul-de-sac that appears to meet the requirements of UDC 11-6C-3B-4. ii. Common driveways Per UDC 11-6C-3D,common driveways shall serve a maximum of four(4)dwelling units. In no case shall more than three(3)dwelling units be located on one (1)side of the driveway. The applicant is proposing two (2) common driveways that meet the dimensional requirements as outlined in the UDC. In. Block face UDC 11-6C-3-regulates block lengths for residential subdivisions. Staff has reviewed the submitted plat for conformance with these regulations. The intent of this section of code is to ensure block lengths do not exceed 750 ft,although there is the allowance of an increase in block length to 1,000 feet if a pedestrian connection is provided. In no case shall a block face exceed one thousand two hundred(1,200) feet,unless waived by the City Council. It appears the block lengths do not exceed 750 feet as required by UDC 11-6C-3. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan 4.04.02C, Comp Plan 4.05.0I1), UDC 11-3A-6): Per UDC 11-3A-6, requires limiting the tiling and piping of natural waterways, including, but not limited to, ditches, canals, laterals, sloughs and drains where public safety is not a concern as well as improve,protect and incorporate creek corridors (Five Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile, Ten Mile, South Slough and Jackson and Evan Drains) as an amenity in all residential, commercial and industrial designs. When piping and fencing is proposed, the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-6B shall apply. The applicant needs to request a waiver from City Council to keep the canal open. An irrigation ditch under the jurisdiction of the Settler's Irrigation District runs along the northern boundary of the property. The applicant is proposing to tile the ditch and construct a pathway within the irrigation easement. Prior to the City Engineer's signature for the final plat, the applicant must obtain a license agreement from the Settler's Irrigation District authorizing use of the easement for this purpose. Per UDC 11-3A-6E, in Residential Districts, irrigation easements wider than ten (10)feet shall be included in a common lot that is a minimum of twenty(20)feet wide and outside of a fenced area, unless otherwise waived by City Council. Comprehensive Plan policy 4.04.02C requires the applicant to continue partnerships with area irrigation districts to continue to expand pathway system along existing waterways. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Comprehensive Plan policy 4.05.0ID requires improving and protecting creeks and other natural waterways throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas. 2. Pressurized Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required.If a single point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances.Design and construction shall follow best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.03G, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development.All utilities are available to the site. Water main,fire hydrant and water service require a twenty foot(20) wide easement that extends ten (10)feet past the end of main, hydrant, or water meter.No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G requires urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of rezone of this property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s)at the time of rezone ordinance adoption,and the developer. A final plat will not be accepted until the ordinance and development agreements have been approved by City Council. Currently,a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the new DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the rezone. The DA shall,at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: Commercial(Development Agreement No. 1) a. Development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat. Conceptual plans provided,including the landscape plan,conceptual plan,and conceptual building elevations for the commercial development included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein are intended to serve as general guidance for future required commercial applications. b. Future development of the site shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of development. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions c. Prior to submitting plans or a final plat that contains any commercial lots,the applicant shall submit a traffic impact study to address the potential impacts of the commercial lots as determined by ACHD. Coordinate the scope of work with the Ada County Highway District Planning Review staff.Additional conditions of approval may be required based on the findings of the updated traffic study. d. New buildings on pad sites adjacent to W.Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive be limited to no more than a 1-story disparity in building height.Natural features,differences in grade, and other context sensitive neighborhood preservation design features should be considered with transitions. e. Building elevations shall comply with the Architectural Standards Manual,UDC,and Comprehensive Plan. Building elevations shall be evaluated with the submittal of a certificate of zoning compliance and design review applications. f. The buildings shall not have loading docks or outside storage adjacent to W.Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive without screening of loading areas and mechanical systems. g. The business hours of operations for the C-G zoning district along W. Malta Drive/W. Gondola Drive shall be limited from 6:00 a.m.to 11:00 p.m.Extended hours of operation may be requested through a conditional use permit. h. For lots with frontage on a public street,a minimum of forty(40)percent of the buildable frontage of the property shall be occupied by building facades and/or public space. i. Approval of the proposed plaza area shall require the following: (i)minimum of 16,000 square feet; (ii)amenities shall be provided that promote transition from the residential areas to commercial uses,including,without limitation seating areas,gathering spaces, and multimodal facilities such as bicycle repair stations,workout stations,etc. The plaza design shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the final plat approval or with the development of the second phase of the landscape improvements. j- Development of the proposed plaza area shall be required with the first commercial phase of the project that is adjacent to the plaza area. ,unless the final„la4 f F the e e a1 appr-&ved for-phased d&velepment. k. The commercial portion of the development shall be responsible for the construction of the entire new collector roadway(Gondola/Malta Drive)including landscaping,multiuse pathways,and landseaping en both sides if it develops prior the residential portion excluding the ten(10) foot multi-use pathway and landscaping on the west residential side of the new collector road. 1. Multi-family residential development shall be prohibited within the C-G zoning district in order to preserve the commercial land use and prevent further reduction of the commercial portion of the property. in. The landscape buffers along Ten Mile Road and the new collector shall be constructed within the first two phases of the commercial and office development. n. The L-O zoning district shall be required to have a thirty(30) foot landscape buffer and a 5-foot-wide pathway as depicted in the concept plan. o. No new driveways are approved as part of this application. Direct lot access to Ten Mile Road is prohibited unless otherwise approved by Council and ACHD based on an approved updated TIS. p. Additional driveways accessing the new collector shall be prohibited unless otherwise approved by Council and ACHD based on an approved updated TIS. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions ,,vcvc`y'sJn urr b�pciiirttea vr-tic icv cvn11 cvtox, ciCcpt for-these c"licidyidenti fiea-1 q. Pedestrian circulation and cross access shall generally conform to the layouts depicted in the concept plans provided in Exhibits VLG and VLM. Residential(Development Agreement No. 2) r. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan,phasing plan,and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section IV and the provisions contained herein. s. Future development of the site shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of development. t. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures along W. Gondola/W. Malta Drive shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies, material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. u. W. Gondola/W. Malta Drive shall be constructed to N.Vicenza Way_ excluding only the ten(10)foot multi-use pathway and landscaping on the east side of the new collector roadway in the first phase. The remainder of the roadway to N. San Vito Way shall be completely constructed as a complete street including sidewalk and landscaping on both sides_prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the second phase. the issuanee of eei4ifieates of oeetipaney for-homes within the fifst phase,W. . Malta Dr-iN,e shall be eenstmeted in its entifet�I, e�iehiding only the ten(10) feet multi use a o 1. The Preliminary Plat included in Section VII,dated 12/17/24,is approved with the following revisions: a. All utility easements reflected on the utility plan shall be included on the final plat. b. All pathways and micropathways shall be within a separate common lot or easement as required per UDC 11-3A-8. c. Add a note to the plat stating plat note both the L-O and C-G zoning districts have a blanket cross access easement for access to the public roadways in accordance with UDC 11-3A-3. 2. The Landscape Plan included in Section VII,dated 12/18/24, shall be submitted for review and approval with the following revisions prior to final plat approval: a. Work with the Irrigation District to enter into an agreement to provide some type of landscaping other than gravel in the common open space area on the northern part of the property. The applicant will need to revise the landscape plan accordingly with the understanding that trees will not be allowed in the area,but shrubs may be allowed to be added if negotiated within an agreement with the Irrigation District. If not,the applicant shall submit for alternative compliance for the landscaping in this area. b. Revise the landscape plan to show an open vision fence on lots 45,47,and 49. 3. Business hours of operation in the L-O zoning district shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions 4. Prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall submit a public access easement for the multi-use pathway along W.Malta Drive/Gondola Drive to the Planning Division for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation or unless required by ACHD. 5. The applicant shall coordinate with the Irrigation District regarding gravity irrigation service to ensure that Lots 78-84,Block 5 do not require an easement exceeding ten(10) feet in width. If an easement greater than ten(10)feet is required,it shall be located within a common lot with a minimum width of twenty(20) feet and situated outside of any fenced area,unless otherwise waived by the City Council in accordance with UDC 11-3A-6. If the irrigation easement is located in a common lot,the applicant shall install a micropathway within the common lot to connect to the proposed pathway system to on the north side of the property. 6. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B,as applicable. 7. The development shall comply with standards and installation for landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5 and maintenance thereof as set forth in UDC 11-3B-13. 8. Pathway and adjoining fencings and landscaping shall be constructed consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A7, 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12C. 9. The development shall comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3,including but not limited to driveways,easements,blocks,street buffers,and mailbox placement. 10. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 11. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accordance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6 for the nonresidential uses based on gross floor area. 12. All common driveways shall meet the requirements of 11-6C-2-D including a perpetual ingress/egress easement being filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. 13. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed commercial and office development prior to submittal of a building permit application. The design of the site and structures shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19;the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 14. The Applicant shall have a maximum of two(2)years to obtain City Engineer's signature on a final plat in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 15. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of ACHD. 16. Staff's failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. B. Meridian Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Water mains need a casing when crossing irrigation that limits access to times of the year. Either provide casing or proof that the City will have access at all times. Current configuration would not allow the casing to be installed per City standards and would need to be adjusted if casing is needed. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions 2. Engineer to verify if there is a well onsite. If a well is located on the site it must be abandoned per regulatory requirements and proof of abandonment must be provided to the City. 3. Stub will need to connect to southern stub off of N Vicenza Way when this area develops. 4. Stub will need to connect to north stub off of W Malta Dr when area develops. 5. The water line from San Vito Way needs to connect to the rest of the development.If the existing stub is not used it needs to be abandoned and a different connection will need to be made. 6. Eliminate dead-end at station 3,by connecting water through pathway. Provide a 20' easement with the water main centered in easement.No trees or other permanent structures allowed in easement. 7. Locate meters and fire hydrants so they are at least 5'from trees or other permanent structure. 8. Ensure no permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)are built within the utility easement. 9. Provide 20'Easements for mains,hydrant laterals and water services. Easements should extend up to the end of main/hydrant/water meter and 10'beyond it. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Per Meridian City Code (MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review.Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to development plan approval. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 5. All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions 6. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development,and if so,how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9. Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated,road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 10. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping,amenities,etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 11. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures.Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 15. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 16. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 17. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 18. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 19. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 20. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions copy of the standards can be found at htip://www.meridianciiy.org./public works.aspx?id=272. 21. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 22. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. Meridian Police Department https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id 379825&dbid 0&repo MeridianCit X D. Meridian Park's Department 1. The project developer shall design and construct multi-use pathways consistent with the location and specifications set forth in the Meridian Pathways Master Plan Map and Master Pathways Plan Document Chapter 3).Any proposed adjustments to pathway alignment shall be coordinated through the Pathways Project Manager. Interactive Pathways Map 2. Prior to final approval the applicant shall dedicate a public access easement for a 10' wide, detached multiuse pathway connecting from the existing pathway at W Gondola Drive, running along the north side of W Gondola Drive,continuing along W Malta Drive,and out to N. Ten Mile Road. Easements shall be a minimum of 14' wide (10' pathway+2' shoulder each side).Pedestrian access easement need only be dedicated for multi-use pathways that lie outside the public ROW.Use standard City template for public access easement. Submit all easements online through Citizen's Access Portal. 3. Construct multi-use pathways per paving section based on existing site conditions as recommended by project civil engineer in accord with UDC 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12. Prior to final approval the applicant's engineer shall provide written documentation that the pathway segment was constructed per the recommended specifications. 4. The owner(or representative association)of the property affected by each public access easement shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain the multi-use pathway. E. School Impact Community Development hyps://weblink.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/Browse.aspx?id 379825&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X F. Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho(COMPASS) https:llweblink.meridiancioy oEgi ebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id 379825&dbid O&repo=MeridianCit X G. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) https://weblink.meridiancity.org ffebLink/Browse.aspx?id 379825&dbid 0&repo—Meridian Cit X City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions H. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/2ebLink/browse.aspx?id 379825&dbid 0&repo MeridianCit Y L Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancioy orgj ebLink/browse.aspx?id 379825&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit Y V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment to rezone the property from the R-8 zoning district to the O-T zoning district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment complies with the regulations outlined in the requested R-8, R-15 and C-G zoning districts. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,and welfare; Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds the proposed zoning map amendment will not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Not applicable B. Preliminary Plat(UDC-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section IV. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Council finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's Capital Improvement Program. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Council is unaware of any significant natural,scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the rezone from C-C (Community Commercial)to R-8 and R-15 (Residential)zoning districts,L-O,C-G and the preliminary plat associated with the residential and commercial development per the provisions in Section W in accord with the Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on May 15,2025. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject rezone, preliminary_plat and Development Agreement modification requests. 1. Suminary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Hethe Clark,representingthe he applicant b. In opposition: Wade Ramsey,Robin Campbell,Patricia Fritschle,Tom Callison,Patty Scales,Richard Boyle,James Ferguson,Janice Bochard,Roger Soucy,Christian Jensen, Troy Camiglia,Tracy Garrison,Megan Ratzesberger,Allison Rice,David McAdams C. Commenting: Wade Ramsey,Robin Campbell,Patricia Fritschle,Tom Callison,Patty Scales,Richard Boyle,James Ferguson,Janice Bochard,Roger Soucy,Christian Jensen, Troy Camiglia,Tracy Garrison,Megan Ratzesberger,Allison Rice,David McAdams d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parson 2. Ke, ids)of public testimony a. Too much density,increased traffic, safety concern for individuals trying to make a left turn onto Ten Mile from the new collector road without a traffic signal, safety concerns with the increased traffic,overcrowding of the schools in the area,proposed development not consistent with the neighborhood(R-8 vs R-15) 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Collector being completed in phase 1,density a bit high,limiting big box potential on commercial side 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Commercial Development Agreement: la-Development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminaa plat. Conceptual plans provided,including the landscape plan and conceptual building elevations for the commercial development included in Section VII and the provisions City of Meridian I Department Report VL Action contained herein are intended to serve as general guidance for future required commercia applications. lc -Prior to submitting plans or a final plat that contains any commercial lots,the applicc- shall submit a traffic impact study to address the potential impacts of the commercial lots as determined by ACHD. Coordinate the scope of work with the Ada County Highway District Planning Review staff. Additional conditions of approval may be required based the findings of the updated traffic study. 1 g—Staff is working with the applicant regarding requirements for transitioning and will have this issue resolved prior to the City Council hearing, for now the condition stands as presented. I -Development of the proposed plaza area shall be required with the first commercial phase of the project that is adjacent to the plaza area,unless the final plat for the commercial portion is approved for phased development. lk-The commercial portion of the development shall be responsible for the construction of the entire new collector roadway(Gondola/Malta Drive)including landscaping pathways,and landscaping on both sides if it develops prior the residential portion excluding the ten(10) foot multi-use pathway and landscaping on the west residential sid of the new collector road. 1p—Staff is working with the applicant on this issue and should have a resolution prior t< the City Council hearing, for now the conditions stands as presented. b Residential Development Agreement: Iv—remove this condition as the phasing plan has been revised to show the amenities being built with the second phase. 5. Outstandingissue(s) for City Council: a. Conditions Ig, 1p and lu as staff and the applicant are still working to resolve these conditions. C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 10.2025.At the public hearing_ the Council moved to approve the subject Development Agreement Modification_Preliminary Plat and Rezone requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Hethe Clark_representing the applicant_ Jim Conger b. In opposition: Patricia Fritschle_Richard Boyle_John Wycoff_Paul Elam_Marcy Sutcliffe_Bobbie Beck C. Commenting: • Patricia Fritschle -opposes the density and overcrowding of schools as children in her subdivision are being bused to a different school. • Richard Boyle—the existing Bridgetower neighborhood park being reduced in size and the remaining park unusable. Turning the park over to the HOA does not alleviate the problem if the current property owner still maintains control of the HOA. • John Wycoff—concerned about the water rights for the Bridgetower neighborhood. • Paul Elam—too much development in the area and the existing infrastructure cannot handle the traffic.No longer have faith in the Council. • Marcy Sutcliffe—does not feel the new collector road will alleviate traffic congestion in this area,have issues with the density and some of the ancillary proposals and conditions of the project. • Bobbie Beck—overcrowding of the local schools. d. Written testimony: Shawn Freeman_ In opposition to the proposed development. Opposes rezoning from R-4 to R-8. The streets are not equipped to handle the influx of City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action vehicles. The increased density will lead to overcrowding, strain on local resources such as schools_utilities and a decline in the peaceful environment that makes this area a desirable place to live. C. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons_Rebecca Phillips-ACHD 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. Density_ overcrowding of the schools_traffic congestion_water rights_relinquishment of the Bridgetower HOA from the current owner_reduction in size of the existing park 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Control of the existing Bridgetower Subdivision park_control of existing HOA for Bridgetower Subdivision_water rights for the Bridgetower Subdivision 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial lnow- , vim Legend surd��+0ra r Project Location ua.��aH,aei�u�- -� ;— 8� �' -,- • �-� 1 Area of Impact a MINOR; �=xr _ 'S J.Ica.■ra.as.e va�ecea,■�y Analysis +�■A���a mnm •a�•�aa�e ubz j a Rig! 1 r ■w- m� � G � I � �IIIa111. rrree•r�gl• 39 ��� i:i■f.11•Q r "m i City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits Legend CHI�NDEN Project Location Are ■mI�EIIIII■. m uw� :a: � • of Impact nunln Gogiq 1 n.�mn: :� • Analysis 1nu■minl-Illllln• �nnml _- i ..i Init ���y���111 .In111n�� �. :►q� ��a nnnn■u•�r�j•d������I 111.nun► � • 1 ►•:►�°•••• ° _�iuiiiiiii wi;�{I��-- • t■.IIII 1�1 Imo• I:►.- 11 Ir' ••� tl IIU��•�aunp==II nuuuu'�••n1.n.1 UIIIn11 - •f --�1�. :: :11111 IIII. 11 a�...,.:••�•�Illt■IInn1.►•�••.;j.t■• IrIL►•3-/� gill�_ '::11w null)m..-_ u�V: O♦qu��m. p•r;.11lllll I -:� 1���� ' ���i�••�thiiu Illnplullllt W■. �11►��� •/�q�►���I/Nlnn �'O•�-a 111�N .n.■ MAN null �,C- IUO{ wmnnm 1.111/�'.in�•� • L'7 �'un W ii:�a1 i ouunw.1y��.iii ■nnm noon�■.n n.0.1..n Y �� ¢I ••'::wu noun-►wi Inn�-= („� r1►►. � u.r IU■■om uw i1 in. nll .■�!i ■now■Ina■n logo Q IIn��� dl.u.nn...■ ■■ Noel n■u.nn- Z n■Inn Ig .. iiii � F I■I■nr.■■Igloo .■■.•■m ►P:Illuuuf"n.t �;_►�../ 11111 11.►�/�.Illtnm ■gtg11 I'1' iul41 = '��nn..� ■ MCMIL--LAN .1 rinnun own 1 - el �Inu uq�1�Q� I■o • 1 nl..11 �/•♦ Ian. IIIIIIIU■Illll nl il.11ll���j���•• j I.l 1111111/IIIIII. ■p 1 •tIt111q��♦��� ���-. uuuu■nml m � [igloo ♦% h.In mnumml nm���1 1— nl/►�q-�IIIq�f�I/�1 1/iluun ■� RUT Legend t •j 11'�►IU��}/��1�IIIINu Project I � CHINDEN m 7 r �-.t 111 nm■.n1/1.. -- -• of Impact ■■....Illllln=- • - O o� � �c1111n• .m-uw. --. uginnnun.�• T ounul 7■■1giI 1 - .gill nm p ._7 ..Inwn mm�N�. � I=::�:_- _ l.nmm�nun•�i -p11 Analysis �lnuumml-1111111■•� r�r��- .... ...! :-'i ppp� �� �,111111111111 IIIIIIn�Il�ir 1111111- �:: :::p1►111=t��i - iiii�iiii i�j1�'�1��•�,��� •I UNION loll :Illllllu u■nt1 :: �� �• :•••i�lq• ��• -= �■nuuu w►•• IIi911\\ �►IIIU(IIII► ::C ► ^ gin vn.♦��•a __I lunnm��i MO �.-� _ �An U►' C pp: ��.11•► ` I■nllll 1 '11111.II���•amu�-= nnn.n■��•�n4n.n nq �UIInn ��111 Ci�1 II-is��0.11 t.■It��Ij/�iU���Iui11111 ai\{\I�r:j�•I`�II..Inn11►'•=•/-,iiiiiiiiiii �•��► 1_�-. --.. n1III1110►��- hl ■ �/O 1rint...11►♦ ��Ilpn�dl�►- _/� _-nu�_ ip:_'.I nnmun�:__-: I�r�: O�4�n•Uiiiii i ui 1. .OIIIIII'llll� -iiuun_. . •Inm nnl►�•__._ � � �Q���••�Aunugin- .�Innpunun ulw � • II.I.p I�uw nm►�_"-- wit {■�_a Ilunm nuu.11unmui - • ��� Null■np� L{{ nuuum . IIII►� 11111/I�nln• �:► �uuuml�� I;linr,Cm i1.■uw n_�♦ nl.•l V �` ��I I.u■► W 11-�,�•..r� • - • - • n■�nm.1..� nu.1... quu►�. F 1 n■-- mm non■-/uu..e a m I�nm■�� � . � gill::■gi n 11/p u aul,1 iuum•_-• IIIO::C:iiiiil • IIIII',III\� . �• -- .■.■u will■In ■non a •-■•••� � �• � I IIII t1111 II...��� rinm unu�uu nu 1111��`iuullt J mliiui�um nu■ndlll l II► n I ■nn non■.nn UI IIIIII= e _ -IIII.:.Inl- • In■.u■■".IgI11111 -nnnnnim _ - IUnI -unuu■um= o e o - • IILI I•1111 IIIIIII6 1nmm�nuuI_ --- -- ■ OR 11111111111=nm—_� t.= ;\I.II-1 1 i�_�Illllli 11111 pe ,,,,,, 111 1 Illinen • • �\.1.■ MCMIL-L-AN - ,- ■��- -11IM ullui�r/nllnn�ulogi igiuunl "'"� _-__-I mnunnnun Igim, tuunu r'1 �i L �.-�""J umn =-IRIn • ner nm•-gin -%�Im nndllu►�iDilo 1 - '- • - • -_i _gi�gigi �♦ � 111 11� 1j1 �����° .gin:�� i��,��, n u►� ' ��111 11u 4. Planned Development Map Legend a -. 0 Project Location ,- Area of Impact V ® 6Ulu T=" City Limits - Planned Parcels Analysis &RPFFFHT9- PTH .. ® ® C= e F IIap City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 5. Map Notes Nearby Recent Preliminary Plats(within last 5-years) H-2019-0146 H-2020-0004 H-2020-0022 H-2021-0001 H-2021-0018 H-2021-0051 H-2021- 0080 H-2022-0034 H-2022-0028 H-2022-0047 H-2022-0068 CR-2022-0006 H-2022-0074 H-2022-0076 H-2022-0087 H-2023-0014 H-2023-0016 H-2023-0026 H-2023-0035 H-2024- 0050 Nearby Recent Conditional Use Permits(within last 5-years) H-2018-0018 H-2019-0074 H-2020-0032 H-2020-0017 H-2020-0092 H-2020-0101 H-2021- 0056 H-2018-0088 H-2018-0004 H-2022-0006 H-2022-0025 H-2024-0016 City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits B. Subject Site Photos PRO �t T City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL SO427417210 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 24 15th Percentile Description Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time 5-9 min. YELLOW Emergency Services Police Not enough data to report average response time Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving (existing or future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits D. Preliminary Plat(date: 12/17/2024) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ADERO PARK SUBDIVISION F 4-Wrl�PAI�I UM I DMN ----------- -MER1DM9-,-0 JR, z ... I —------- :1 N Z 4i ---ffr -7- PP1.0 City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits E. Commercial Concept Plan/Building Layout JJ�JJ wu nj 1 GG I �\ IM1 • lb C-G I WALMAFT DRAINAGEWALMART v v 4A•-------------- DRAINAGE E F ADERO PARK SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN MERIDIAN, ID aw,»,,,, F6BR=47,2025 Z� —_—_ ------ ----____"—__—__—__—__—__—_.—__—._ _ I I F I BiR I i I i I I j LIU COMMERCIAL LAYOUT CONCEPT 2 \ \- THE E-f-L E T HE L-. I E HE-EI -E > _ F ILL T TIDE E 'L THE E E E T-'FELI.1 THEE.INRJE•-:�' \ -_.T E'-11 La.JESI,EIE E�T�I,THE RIA-DEIM"E'J City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits F. Phasing Plan Y� PRELIMINARI PUT FOR ROW ADERO PARK SUBDIVISION lift �Z4 NIL .v tt1 o _ 1 +mr RR\� Li 1 � ..�TPhase a � � T t� � •r� ' Commercial phasing ID OR .i tleterminer3 a with-final\ lal application - p f_ "Ppio G. Commercial Access and Pedestrian Plan (date: 5/8/2025) .Z - — .�.._ - ------------------------------ ------- ---------------------- - - -' j l I I I D COMMERCIAL ACCESS AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN YIYa'1R..W ��PUNNO N�v�Ev Nt DESIGN CHN1G NEPRESENi NtELURu DON rurvxE NUINEr caNpraxs PIMS DD MIJI—IN TN NKNUMv�DS WENT. \\ City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits H. Landscape Plan (date: 12/18/2024) l ADERO PARK SUBDIVISION O •�.Br�! ,ENSENBELTS PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN MERIDIAN, ID "Wr. oncenrE iti � �'91C� -_ _� City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits 1. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 12/19/2024) 7- WX J! ADERO PARK SUBDIVISION -SPACE-BIT TOTAL RESIDENTIAL AREA=1-3 AC M--..-SPACE=.5--(I S..V ­NG OPEN -0-ING OPCN-1 T V J. Amenities Exhibit(date: 12/19/2024) Proposed Amenities: One Acre Central Plata(Block 4,Lot 33)- • three Pickleball Courts • Fountain • Play Structure • Dog Park • Climbing Rock • Seating Benches • Attractive Landscaping City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits i i ar «•��� wN11�Is�rIMM�rn •�f i�.Alll ���= �iidlllil DepartmentCity of Men'dian po • Pathways—The Adefo Mixed Use Neighborhood will include the following pedestrian pathways: • 10'Wide Regional Pathway 2,752 LF • S'wide pathway in liner open space 1,700 LF 1 Pedestrian pathways within the Adero Mixed Use Neighborhood will total a half a mile in length. • Dog Park(Block S,Lot 4S) • Fenced encloser • Dog Waste Station • Sitting Benches • Attractive Landscaping •Other open green areas—Several other open spaces will have the following Amenities. • Shade structures • Large open grass areas • Internal Pathways • Picnic Area • Attractive Landscaping City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits K. Common Driveway Exhibit(date: 12/17/2024) 7 r---- IX 45 Tins WKU MEET M=S DRM1F Y L m SIDE im LOT18 TRIES DREU ON MSI .E . =S.DRt—LO.Tw *D'SM S Tpc T —n 49 LOIS 23'" I ——————————— 2.- =2 = 12 1. C-W ADERO PARK SUBDIVISION LOTS 18-23 AND 43AS BLOCK 4 COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits L. Block Length Exhibit ADERO PARK SUBDIVISION BLOCK LENGTH EXHIBIT 1-d- I City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits M. Pedestrian Connectivity Exhibit Hero's iPark I - I I I l -J \• "i" j M111 ro i 0/11� oi0 \ i" e Red =Internal Sidewalks and pathways Blue= Regional Pathways City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits N. Residential Building Elevations (date: Click here to enter a date.) Y J ohm— R I4���wwwl�i'1 Tl- 1 City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits Departmentpo O. Commercial Exhibits(5/9/2025) The images provided are intended solely for architectural reference. They are not representative of specific individual uses. Future buildings may or may not incorporate architectural elements depicted in these images. k y_'�] • 11 - - - �- raitureBMa essttressttr — 1 � i CW iley a e 9w&II City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits k- ]N r`— �A - bk City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits -. rL imi s imrll rSinai +gym wMa L 4r. ` �. � tT: L s 9',Tra� UNION . 1 ' z I City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits Ca � MR - City 1f Men'dian Department Re 11Exhibits P. R-8 Rezone Legal Description & Exhibit Map 5awtooth Land Surveying, LLC - P: (208)398-5104 F: (206)396-5105 2030 5. WaShmgton Ave., Emmett. IP 53G 17 R-8 Zone Description BASIS OF BEARINGS is S.89°21'10"E.,between a found aluminum cap marking the Cl/4 corner of Section 27 and a found aluminum cap marking the E1/4 of Section 27,T.4 N.,R. 1 W., B.M. A parcel of land located in the SE1/4 of Section 27,Township 4 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at and aluminum cap marking the E1/4 corner of Section 27; Thence N.89021'10"W.,coincident with the north line of said SEI/4,the south boundary of Bainbridge Subdivision No. 10,as shown in Book 118 of Plats, Pages 18069-1 807 1,the south boundary of Bainbridge Subdivision No.9,as shown in Book 116 of Plats,Pages 17641-17645 and the south boundary of Bainbridge Subdivision No.8,as shown in Book 115 of Plats, Pages 17189-17193,Ada County Records, 1789.66 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said north line,S.0021'17"W.,320.15 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 10.19 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 13.00 feet,through a central angle of 44155'36",subtended by a chord bearing S. 22149'05"W.,9.93 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left; Thence 98.83 feet along the arc of said curve,having a radius of 55.00 feet,through a central angle of 102057'08",subtended by a chord bearing S.6111'40"E.,86.06 feet; Thencc non tangent to said curve,5. 13°59'17"W., 114.69 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left; Thence 96.74 feet along the arc of said curve,having a radius of 55.00 feet,through a central angle of 100146'28",subtended by a chord bearing S.37148'10"W.,84.74 feet; Thence non-tangent to said curve,S. 77124'56"W.,87.65 feet; Thence S. 32°30'06"E.,65.02 feet; Thence S. 12°35'04"E., 294.87 feet; Thence S. 29030'15"E.,633.75 feet to the south line of Parcel A,as shown on Record of Survey No. 12520,Ada County Records; Thence N.89°14'29"W.,coincident with said south line, 192.23 feet to the easterly boundary of Vicenza Subdivision as shown in Book 108 of Plats,Pages 15026-15028,Ada County Records and the beginning of a non- tangent curve to the right; Thence 109.90 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 555.00 feet,through a central angle of 11120'44",subtended by a chord bearing N.33022'04"E., 109.72 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Vicenza Subdivision; PA202411 EMT1124014-N TEN MILE RD T0P01SurveylDrawings\Legal Descriptionsl124014 R-8 Zone to Centerline Description.docx Pact . �1 City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits Thence N.47048'16"W.,coincident with the northerly boundary of said Vicenza Subdivision, 18.03 feet to the easterly right of way of N.San Vito Way and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left; Thence leaving said northerly boundary and coincident with said right of way, 39.16 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 573.00 feet,through a central angle of 3054'5S",subtended by a chord bearing S. 37010'56"W., 39.15 feet to the centerline extended of W. Gondola Dr; Thence N. 54037'59"W.,coincident with said centerline of W.Gondola Dr and the extension thereof, 211.53 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Thence coincident with said centerline, 149.14 feet along the arc of said curve,having a radius of 300.00 feet, through a central angle of 28029'04", subtended by a chord bearing N.68052'31"W., 147.61 feet to the extension of the westerly boundary of Vicenza Subdivision No. 2 as shown in Book 110 of Plats, Pages 15670- 15673,Ada County Records; Thence non-tangent to said curve,N. 100241"E.,coincident with said westerly boundary and the extension thereof, 238.56 feet; Thence coincident with the northerly boundary of said Vincenza Subdivision No.2 the following six(6)courses and distances: Thence N.88057'19"W.,296.43 feet; Thence S. 5014'47"W.,91.17 feet; Thence S. 18°4848"W., 107.19 feet; Thence N.67123'12"W., 129.19 feet; Thence N.2504239"E.,6.93 feet; Thence N.64017'45"W., 26.00 feet to the centerline of N. Bolsena Way and the beginning of a non-tangent curve left; Thence coincident with said centerline, 326.23 feet along the arc of said curve,having a radius of 298.00 feet, through a central angle of 62°43'24",subtended by a chord bearing N.5°36'57"W.,310.18 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right; Thence coincident with said centerline, 196.92 feet along the arc of said curve,having a radius of 300.00 feet, through a central angle of 37036'35",subtended by a chord bearing N. 18110'20"W., 193.41 feet; Thence N.0037'57"E.,coincident with said centerline,48.23 feet to the extension of the southerly line of Vicenza Subdivision No.3 as shown in Book 112 of Plats,Pages 16373-16375,Ada County Records; Thence along the southerly and easterly boundaries of said Vicenza Subdivision No.3 the following four(4) courses and distances: Thence S.89022'03"E.,465.11 feet; Thence N.67031'57"E., 137.46 feet; Thence N.27039'20"E., 136.69 feet; Thence N.0039'22"E., 123.49 feet to the northeast corner of said Vicenza Subdivision No. 3 and the southeast corner of Vicenza Lakes Subdivision as shown in Book 115 of Plats, Pages 17340-17342,Ada County Records; P:Q024\1 EMT\124014-N TEN MILE RD TOPO\Survey\Drawings\Legal Descriptions\124014 R-8 Zone to Centerline Descnption.docx 1-1 11 _ 12 City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits Thence continuing, N.0039 22"E.,coincident with the east line of said Vicenza Lakes Subdivision, 305.69 feet to the north line of said SEI/4 and the south boundary of said Bainbridge Subdivision No.8; Thence S.89021'10"E.,coincident with said north line and said south boundary, 133.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parch contains 11.186 acres,more or less. 1157 PA202411 EMT1124014-N TEN MILE RD TOP01Surveyl[kawingslLegal Descnptionsi124014 R•8 Zone to Centerline Deecriptlon,docx Page 13 City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits [� I • I ���� � 3�`9i1�rY •t � � � F 7lYi t%'�'� wl Ip� I I�� �, -. Haibin s:w xx:za Ya/t9Jd I 123-�9' 304.67 G P&�I w�i��m m nmhi Km � W�441.'j 1.t6 � NA?]r'1TE I Mir, aa( Y -If_VWEHA RAY �p 2#S�2Y y��11m$a p� m `S ii '— +, t cu FS oC= s�ir�rNB K. TEN MILE ROAD y a+�Nw�zae:�twaz:aratw�� s�� City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits Q. R-15 Rezone Legal Description& Exhibit Map 5awtooth Land 5urveyincg, LLC P: (208)398 8104 F: (208)398-8 t 05 2030 5. Washington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 R-15 Zone Description BASIS OF BEARINGS is S.89021'10"E., between a found aluminum cap marking the C1/4 corner of Section 27 and a found aluminum cap marking the E1/4 of Section 27,T.4 N., R. 1 W., B.M. A parcel of land located in the SE1/4 of Section 27,Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at and aluminum cap marking the E1/4 corner of Section 27; Thence N. 89121'10"W.,coincident with the north line of said SE1/4, a distance of 377.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said north line, S. 0121'17"W., 53.05 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 102.49 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 420.50 feet,through a central angle of 13057'56", subtended by a chord bearing S. 7120'15"W., 102.24 feet; Thence S.40019'35"E., 84.10 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; Thence 154.94 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 180.00 feet,through a central angle of 49019'08",subtended by a chord bearing S. 25000'SI"W., 150.20 feet; Thence S.0021'17"W., 84.49 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 282.71 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 180,00 feet,through a central angle of 90100'00", subtended by a chord bearing S. 45021'17"W.,254.56 feet; Thence N.89038'43"W., 76.50 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Thence 471.24 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 300.00 feet,through a central angle of 90100'00", subtended by a chord bearing S. 45021'17"W.,424.26 feet; Thence S. 0021'17"W., 246.12 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 188.94 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 180.00 feet,through a central angle of 60008'28",subtended by a chord bearing S. 3002531"W., 180.38 feet; Thence S. 60029'45"W., 285.55 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 92.58 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 15009'19",subtended by a chord bearing S. 68004'25"W.,92.31 feet to the south line of Parcel A,as shown on Record of Survey No. 12520,Ada County Records; Thence N.89014'29"W., coincident with said south line, 153.33 feet; Thence leaving said south line, N. 29030'15"W., 633.75 feet; P:1202411 EMT1124014-N TEN MILE RD TOPO1Survey\Drawings\Legal Descriptions1124014 R-15 Zone Description.docx I City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Thence N. 12035'04"W.,294.87 feet; Thence N.3290'06"W.,65.02 feet; Thence N. 77°24'56"E., 87.65 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; Thence 96.74 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 55.00 feet,through a central angle of 100046'28",subtended by a chord bearing N.37048'10"E.,84.74 feet; Thence non-tangent to said curve,N. 13®59'17"E., 114.69 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; Thence 98.83 feet along the arc of said curve,having a radius of 55.00 feet, through a central angle of t020ST08",subtended by a chord bearing N.6111'40"W.,86.06 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left; Thence 10.19 feet along the arc of said curve,having a radius of 13.00 feet,through a central angle of 44055'36",subtended by a chord bearing N.221149'05"E.,9.93 feet; Thence N.0021`17"E.,320.15 feet to the north line of said SE1J4 and the south boundary of Bainbridge Subdivision No.8,as shown in Book 115 of Plats, Pages 17189-17193,Ada County Records; Thence S. 89021'10"E.,coincident with said north line and said south boundary and the south boundary of Bainbridge Subdivision No. 9,as shown in Book 116 of Plats, Pages 17641-17645 and the south boundary of Bainbridge Subdivision No. 10,as shown in Book 118 of Plats, Pages 18069-18071,a distance of 1412,43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 35,822 acres, more or less. �E G 57 P:Q02M1 EMT1124014-N TEN MILE RD T0P01Survey0rawings\Legal Descriptions1124014 R-15 Zone Description.docx 2 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Q�'G�.Gti•.iRQg���.QaQQQ79 I �- - - - N/o'L30'E73f¢Sl• I 2 60 ' L21 e s I tl 10 LIS 8� I tii Ia v : 888�8� 88$� u6 I Ism �q I nu I �Q ImmO O1►'�p tl n2 LNOO*3922*E at ; 2 ; fA YI ul in MN;HN 22 429.18• n 69, in.11-.1 al'ill"Mu la a ,► / N 0021'17'E 320.15' Iy .I pr 1{r 1 Nml \IL 1 -M. vic9KA eav '- \¢ 9' Q 2 ' Q \\� 246.1r + 1 5 00'21'17"W I 'O r 3 FI ter\ I l%a S � jzo� I,. I i qI Qs a�' o=yI T1 ryC\ LZ9 (F C1 I \s 7 m _ j e> $�S� v�H G9 La L7 tE S0M7r w N. TEN lI1LE ROAD Iv O T-,0 T�n n^, c::E ��65�&�6� l eav,�, �6�E�6cc�GaG�c PROF ��- lM In;;N±Y1;1n In NN(n N2hV1 � a� r 71 8 9yY `�119 `I '�7 `�IFj� `'�1�^3 `�L '`1LS~ Opv)a > rn>imEEf�minrnln�ll�nttnllc>E�r���> 4 214 co,� ZMi 4t a 1,10 City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits R. L-O Rezone Legal Description & Exhibit Map MOO pqjq a 1al cro iy v m' I.13 vu I ' p a NNx Nan wA 2 w Z�rrxzz aN{, - — a 1�x •� P1 .4Or392rE 429-IF '71t11119 " a"hv', �:1�! /KSAO tM ifa W��ainmmaanr ►' �• NOR°2i7TE _yz Fr I I I K�i 5 J' t J Zit 'I FIN ell C4 a� Nj� IZ S>. Sa9w%rwJ64d.r — '— �- N. TEN MILE ROAD NJ C5 C PROP �� 1n In 4A2:a a i 444ft2:atvbIn;fnl{M1a � � m �� CA A ' City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits S. C-G Rezone Legal Description& Exhibit Map .5avvtooth Land 5urveyinc3, LLG —=� r (208) 398-8104 P: (208)398-8105 2030 5, WJ5hington Avc., Emmett, ID 83b 17 C-G Zone Description BASIS OF BEARINGS is S.89021'10"E., between a found aluminum cap marking the C1/4 corner of Section 27 and a found aluminum cap marking the E1/4 of Section 27,T.4 N., R. 1 W., B.M. A parcel of land located in the SE1/4 of Section 27,Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at and aluminum cap marking the El/4 corner of Section 27; Thence S. 0021'17"W.,coincident with the east line of said SE1/4 and the centerline of N.Ten Mile Road, 172.88 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing, S, 0°21'17"W.,coincident with said east line and said centerline, 1333.59 feet to the extension of the southerly line of Parcel A, as shown on Record of Survey No. 12520,Ada County Records; Thence leaving said east line and said centerline, N. 89114'29"W.,coincident with said extension of and said southerly line of Parcel A,668.74 feet; Thence N. 11101'05"E.,coincident with said southerly line of Parcel A, 112.39 feet; Thence N. 88057'44"W.,coincident with said southerly line of Parcel A,435.26 feet; Thence S. 60029'45"W.,coincident with said southerly line of Parcel A, 31.00 feet to the centerline of N. Vincenza Way and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; Thence 105.43 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 276.00 feet,through a central angle of 21153'13", subtended by a chord bearing S. 18033'38"E., 104.79 feet to the extension of the southerly line of said Parcel A; Thence non-tangent to said curve, N.8901429"W.,coincident with the extension of and the southerly line of said Parcel A, 281.88 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the left; Thence leaving said southerly line, 92.57 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 350.00 feet,through a central angle of 15109'13",subtended by a chord bearing N. 6800421"E.,92.30 feet; Thence N.6002945"E., 285.55 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; Thence 188.94 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 180.00 feet,through a central angle of 60°0828", subtended by a chord bearing N. 30025'31"E., 180.38 feet; Thence N.0021'17"E., 246.12 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 471.24 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 300.00 feet,through a central angle of 90000'00", subtended by a chord bearing N. 45°21'17"E.,424.26 feet; Thence S.89038'43"E., 76.50 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; P:1202411 EMT1124014-N TEN MILE RD TOPOlSurveylDrawingslLegal Descriptions\124014 C-G Zone to Centerline Description.docx City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Thence 282.74 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 180.00 feet,through a central angle of 90000'00", subtended by a chord bearing N, 45021'17"E., 254.56 feet; Thence N.0°21'17"E.,84.49 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 282.74 feet along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 180.00 feet,through a central angle of 90000'00", subtended by a chord bearing N. 45021'17"E., 254.56 feet; Thence S.89038'43"E., 217.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 22.90 acres, more or less. IF EEA� PA202411 EMT1124014-N TEN MILE RD TOPOtSurvey\Drawings\Legal Descriptions1124014 C-G Zone to Centerline Description.docx 12 City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits ts�"—L14— I I y VF N`fn x H W In 2��41 X X 2�X.� '9 1� 44 y y F� gEm��M4w �M.�mmrimmG� � 8 MGMYl1T! fix. P RUM .9 v N. 4ICENA}AY �� 1 A Z :rr2' �! I 3� .4 5oU°�rw Ni 32 tg ++i m� n (•i �p�� I1 134.i qy / Qp Y iz FWIMT-w awa Y, TSN ldILE ROAD tl pQ ZE PROF Q �CA� yyNNylxx��;24i 4e2240 N**2NN2 ��' .C. \. !R FP City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES &DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases,and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days. Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development,government,and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2< 5.0;R-4<2.0;R-8< 1.0;R-15 <0.5;R-40<0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project,approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous,and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases,and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area.Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate,and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency,etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way,and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project,approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources,including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity,and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order),and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low,are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F.Letter A represents free flow conditions,and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D,stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians,nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VIIL Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of New Alcohol License (ALCN-2025-0009) for Level Up Lounge at 830 N. Main St., operating within three hundred (300) feet of a property used for a church or any other place of worship, or any public or private education institution Customer Receipt (� E IDIANIf'-ICity of Meridian, City Clerks Office 33 E. Broadway Ave. Suite 104 11 D A H t' Meridian, ID 83642 PH: 888-4433 / FAX: 888-4218 Date 06/12/2025 Application ALCN-2025-0009 Applicant Applicant Address Project Address Payor Fees and Receipts: Number Description Amount 1063727 Beer License By The Drink $200.00 1063728 Wine License By The Drink $200.00 Total Fees: $400.00 Total Receipts: 3 Balance Due: $400.00 City Clerk's Office C� W DIAN11__ Alcohol Beverage License Application Applicant: File #: l'0.S LLL -3)19A LeVLi uP �-ov 2 X. —202S—COCq Date complete application received: Date license issued or denied: 0- ))120 zf Applicant Staff APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: x Completed application A plication Fees: x Beer—On premise consumption (Includes retail sales)—$200.00 Beer- Retail sales only-$50.00 x Wine—On premise consumption/retail -$200.00 Liquor by the Drink(Includes wine) - $562.50 x Floor plan of licensed premises x Copy of Idaho State license to sell/serve alcohol x Copy of Ada County license to sell/serve alcohol STAFF USE ONLY: City of Meridian Legal Department approval City of Meridian Police Department approval City of Meridian Fire Department approval City of Meridian Building Department approval City of Meridian Planning Department approval City Clerk approval THIS APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL STAFF HAS RECEIVED ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION. Meridian City Clerks Office—33 E. Broadway Ave.— Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone:208-888-4433 —email: cityclerkaa meridiancity.org —Website:http://www.meridlancity.org(updated I2/I9) City Clerks Office E IDIAN�— Alcohol Beverage �� License Application I AHQ APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant name: Wayne Martin Phone: 281.414.7292 Applicant mailing address: 112 E Idaho Ave Meridian ID 83642 Applicant physical address: 5363 S Scandia Av Meridian ID 83642 Applicant email address:wayne.m@las-calaveras.com Name and physical address of agent upon whom service of process may be made in Idaho (person responsible for receiving legal documentation on behalf of Applicant): Wayne Martin 5363 S Scandia Ave Merdian ID 83642 PREMISES INFORMATION Name of Business on premises: Level Up Lounge Physical address of premises: 830 N Main Street Meridian ID 83642 Phone number of premises: 281.414.7292 20 e 931, &C)&,!�- Within 300' of school or place of worship: B No ❑ Yes(attach explanation if necessary) Applicant's interest in property: ❑ Own 09 Rent ❑ Other Premises owner name:Trax Holding LLC Phone: 208.343.4883 Premises owner mailing address: 877 W. Main Street, Suite 700, Boise ID 83702 Premises owner physical address: 877 W. Main Street, Suite 700, Boise ID 83702 BUSINESS INFORMATION Nature of business conducted at premises: Wine Tasting Room Hours of operation: Wednesday-Sunday 4PM - 10PM Type of Alcohol Sales: (circle) eer ine Liquor Hours of alcohol sales: Wednes ay- unday 4PM - 10PM \p(kApplicant is aware of Meridian City Code Alcohol Server Training requirements. INITIAL (vww.meridiancity.org/CityGovemmentICity Clerk/License and Permit Applications/Alcohol Licenses) Meridian City Clerk's Office-- 33 E. Broadway Ave. — Meridian, Idaho 83642 Phone: 208-888-4433 --email: cityclerk(cDmeridiancity.org --Website: http://www.meridiancity.org (updated 12119) dW -^`D5_2 .S� 0 y J S Sb I CLEWED R 2 8 203 IDA O STATE POLICE BEITRAGE CONTROL APR 17 2025 Premise ID \J��y '1Z IDM0STATEPGLICE i Cycle rracking Number:1632t6 dl&dakho Vtate Police IN Premises Number: 1A-45572 License Year: 2026 Retail Alcohol Beverage License License Number: 45572 This is to certify, that Las Calaveras Group-LLC ............. Z doing business as: Level Up Lounge . ...... is licensed to sell alcoholic beverages as stated--bel'ow at.I I 4 112 E Idaho Ave , Meridian, Ada County 0 M LL 0 Z Acceptance of a license by a retailer shall constddt�7-_,knowledge:.qf and agreement to operate by and in U) M LU u_ accordance to the Alcohol Beverage Code, Tit Only the Ij 0- nsee�herein"specified shall use this license. Z ffrp, ii Counj:2 and citylicenses are also required in order to operate. 1 ;044, M cc Liquor No Signature of Licensee, corporate Officer,LLC Member or Partner 0 wBeer Yes $50.00 Z 0 Wine by the bottle Yes $100.00 0 Wine by the glass Yes $100.00 LAS CALAVERASiGROUP LLC 0 0 LL UJ Kegs to go No LEVEL UP LOUNGE rAP,, U) Yes DAHO,AVE Growlers UWj Cn LU Restaurant No Uj > On-premises consumption Yes IQ.00 MERIDIAN, ID 83642 > Uj M L Uj Multipurpose arena No Mailing Address Uj Plaza No Brewer's Retail No Lic-ense Valid. 06/09/2025 -04/30/2026 TOTAL FEE: 250.00 Expires: 04/30/2026 $ Director of Idaho State Police N ABC FORM NO:ABC 03 CITY OF MERIDIAN EN DIAN:--- Certificate of Occupancy p Y Permit# C-CO-2025-0044 Owner: Trax Holding LLC. Parcel Number: R5672000817 830 Main St. Meridian, ID 83642 Address: 830 N MAIN ST, STE 100 Contractor: PROPERTY OWNER (NO CONTRACTO Subdivision: MERIDIAN TOWNSITE AMD Lot(s): Block: 5 Phone: Fax: Project Description: Level Up Lounge Total Building square footage: Purpose: Commercial Description of Use: Retail Space Construction Type: IIIB Occupant Load: 26 Occupancy Classification: N/A Automatic Fire Sprinklers Provided: No Mixed Use Occupancy Classification: N/A Automatic Fire Sprinklers Required: No The applicable codes in effect are as adopted by the City of Meridian at the time of the permit application. Special conditions or stipulations of the Certificate of Occupancy: OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE APPROVAL Certificates of occupancy shall be posted in a conspicuous place. As the Building Official for the City of Meridian, Any deviation from the approved occupancy for which this I hereby certify that all required certificate has been issued is deemed unlawful. final inspections have been completed by The issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy shall not be others for the structure listed above or construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of the portion thereof. Meridian City Building and Fire Codes or of other ordinances of 81&-CIZZ"4� this jurisdiction. Building Official Issue Date: 6/5/2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Foldesi Reserve H-2024-0055) Between City of Meridian and Sherburne Development LLC for Property Located at 3915 N.Ten Mile Rd. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-039425 Boise,Idaho Pgs=_36 vbailey 06/25/2025 08:32:26 AM_ CITY OF MERIDIAN_IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT . City of Meridian . Sherburne Development LLC(Owner/Developer) THIS EELOP ENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 24th day of 2025,by and between ity of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 8362, and Sherburne Development LLC,whose address is 156 E.Iron Eagle Drive, Eagle, Idaho 83616, hereinafter collectively called OWNER/DEVELOPER 1. 1.1 WHEREAS,Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity,of certain tract o land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho,described in Exhibit " ,"which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS,Idaho Code § 67- 511 A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property;and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section I 1-5 -3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS,Owner/Developer have submitted an application for annexation and zoning of 3.31 acres of land with a request for the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district on the property as shown in Exhibit " " under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will bemade; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made;and 1.6 WHEREAS,the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 21" day of January, '2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit " ";and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—FOLDESi RESERVE(H-2024-0055) PAGE 1 OF 7 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Sherburne Development LLC,whose address is 1456 E.Iron Eagle Drive, Eagle,Idaho 83616,the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s)of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-FOLDESI RESERVE(H-2024-0055) PAGE 2 OF 7 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit`B" and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. c. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application(s) shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for this site. d. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, Owner/Developer shall construct driveway stubs to the north and south property lines and record a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granting accesses to the north (Parcel#SO434417201)and south (Parcel #SO434417605) properties in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Ten Mile Road. Copies of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. e. All existing structures shall be removed from the property prior to issuance of the first building permit. f. The Owner/Developer shall consolidate all the access points into a single access point as shown on the concept plan. At the submittal of the first certificate of zoning compliance, the access points being removed shall be replaced with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping in compliance with the UDC. g. The property is allowed to develop with any permitted and conditional uses in the I-L zoning district as represented in UDC Table 1 1-2C-2. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings,the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-FOLDESI RESERVE(H-2024-0055) PAGE 3 OF 7 the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty (180)day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511 A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION:Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation,the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-FOLDESI RESERVE(H-2024-0055) PAGE 4 OF 7 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits,certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Sherburne Development LLC 1456 E. Iron Eagle Drive Eagle, Idaho 83616 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner and/or Developer,to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-FOLDESI RESERVE(H-2024-0055) PAGE 5 OF 7 had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time, provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property,which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 21. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing rezoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text;acknowledgements,signatures and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-FOLDESI RESERVE(H-2024-0055) PAGE 6 OF 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Sherburne Development LLC y:eJaSherburle"�'Its: ger State of Idaho } ss: County of Ada ) On this W6 day of 2025.before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State. personally appeared Jared Sherburne,known or identified to me to be the Manager of Sherburne Development LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Q b�t10EE)HAMMOND ("'N�otaryPubl ic _ Notary Public-State of Idaho My Commission Expires: Commission Number 56364 My Commission Expires Jun 25, 2028 CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-24-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 State of Idaho ) ss County of Ada ) On this 24th day of June 2025, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—FOLDESi RESERVE(H-2024-0055) PAGE 7 OF 7 /�/ ARDURRA EXHIBIT A Project No: 240333 Date: October 10, 2024 Page 1 of 1 ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the N1/2 of the SE1/4 of Section 34,Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said Section 34;thence, along the east boundary of the SE1/4, A) N.00052'59"E., 1982.83 feet to the south boundary of said N1/2 of the SE1/4 and the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence, along said boundary, 1) N.89016'10"W.,425.06 feet; thence, leaving said boundary, 2) N.01057'30"W., 333.11 feet;thence, 3) S.89016'15"E.,441.57 feet to said east boundary of the SE1/4;thence,along said boundary, 4) S.00052'59"W., 332.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 3.31 Acres. ,oNPL �allo 4 13765 OF 332 N.Broadmore Way p ,ID 83687 208.442.6300 wv�r. ;,idurraxom ANNEXATION EXHIBIT SKETCH w LOCATED IN THE N1/2 OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 34, o TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN 0- ADA COUNTY, IDAHO J 2024 cn C1/4 • - - - - - - -34 35 o N89'16'54"W 2647.78' z 0 cn ui w a z o K o 00 � N c� M Q LL U Q w oo _ S8916'15"E 441.57' o W � a z zw z W Z z Is I Z 0' 25' 50, 100,Lu U; o ANNEXATION PARCEL N 3.31 ACRES � 0 Lo z I; IN w I W00 I� u- Loo N O p w O U) O Q Lu Z m z O _ N89'16'10"W 425.06' U _ O O a w r z _ 0 o 00 � �ONP`�LANDi mN w C r N c P.. °' Lu vo cn a \ o 13765 Lu 34 35 Z �q%%4 W. USTICK ROAD 3 2 0'M d 240333•V•XB- ANNEXATION.dwg 10/10/24 240333 z a i� ARDURRA M \/ Cl 332 N.BROADMORE WAY O NAMPA,IDAHO 83687 208-442-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation,by Jeff Hatch. Case No(s).H-2024-0055 For the City Council Hearing Date of: 01/07/2025(Findings on 01/21/2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7',2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7t'', 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7' 2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 2151,2025, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7',2025, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 1 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7', 2025, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one(1)two(2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-5B-6F). FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -2- Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651 IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6) months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code.This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7`h,2025. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 21 st day of January 2025. AYE COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTEDAYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert ison 1-21-2025 Attest: Chris Johnson 1-21-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Cha&wW Dated: 1-21-2025 City Clerk's Office -�` FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -4- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C;�fEPIDIAN*,- DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/7/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council Area of impact �= City Limits >4 r FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis -` a 208-884-5533 f - nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Jeff Hatch SUBJECT: H-2024-0055 Foldesi Reserve LOCATION: Located at 3915 N.Ten Mile Road in LEIEW ` North %of the SE%of Section 34,TAN., \� Y R. �� a.t 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 3.31 acres of land for the construction of approximately 46,005 square feet of industrial space in the I-L zoning district, By Jeff Hatch. B. Recommendation Staff. Approval with Conditions. Commission: Approval. C. Decision k-ouncn: FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -5- COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial/Flex Space - 11. Existing Zoning RUT in Ada County VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning I-L Adopted FLUM Designation Mixed Use Non-Residential (MUNR) VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Mixed Use Non-Residential (MUNR) Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 7/16/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/23/2024 Site posting date 12/9/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.D • Comments Received Yes • Commission Action Required No - • Access Existing driveway to N.Ten Mile Rd (arterial); - Consolidating the 3 access points to a single access point. • Traffic Level of Service Better than E - ITD Comments Received Yes Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site. • Impacts or Concerns No Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site. • Impacts or Concerns Yes: Connection to Ten Mile Road and to the water main on the south boundary will be required at time of development. Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions for comments received or see public record hags://weblink.meridiancity.orz/WebLink/Browse.asox?id=365958&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit Y. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -6- STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject property is designated as Mixed Use Non-Residential on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed zoning of Light Industrial (I-L) is consistent with the FLUM. The u1. applicant is proposing to construct approximately 46,005 square feet of industrial space and self- storage(storage condos). These uses are listed as allowed in the I-L zoning in the UDC and Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is surrounded by self-service storage facilities as this property is within the proximity of the Cities wastewater plant. Industrial spaces and self-storage facilities are a desired use specified in the Mixed-Use Non-Residential designation, as noted above. These spaces provide employment opportunities and valuable spaces for small-scale industrial businesses. Each user will be evaluated at the time of applying for certificate of occupancy. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History N/A Acreage 3.31 acres B. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The site currently contains seven(7)residential and accessory structures. Prior to the issuance of the building permit,these structures shall be removed. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant has indicated the proposed uses for the site intends to be industrial spaces and self-storage buildings. The use of industrial buildings and self-storage facilities (storage condos) aligns with the Mixed-Use Non-Residential (MUNR) future land use designation, which accommodates a range of commercial and industrial users. This project not only provides employment and industrial options within city limits but also advances the city's economic goals and meets the needs of its residents. Specifically, it complies with Policy 3.07.01 D,which promotes the preservation of industrial land by discouraging non-industrial uses and emphasizing light manufacturing, distribution, flex-space, and base employment. Additionally, it aligns with Policy 3.03.01 E,which encourages infill development within the city. The property's location adjacent to N. Ten Mile Road enhances its accessibility and supports the local industrial landscape,addressing the demand for such developments in both the immediate area and the wider community. Furthermore, industrial buildings and self- storage facilities are permitted in the I-L zoning district which supports the applicant proposal. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards of the I-L zoning district in UDC Table 11-3B-3. Based on the concept plan and elevations, the applicant is meeting the 35 foot building setback,SO foot height limit, and has chosen to do a water conserving design to reduce the landscape buffer to 12 %feet along Ten Mile in conformance with the UDC. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -7- 4. Specific Use Standards ((JDC 11-4-3): The applicant has proposed the uses of Industrial space and Self Service Storage Facility but staff is not limiting them to these uses as any allowed uses in the I-L zoning can be established. UDC 11-4-3-34: Storage Facility, Self-Service a. Storage units and/or areas shall not be used as dwellings or as a commercial or industrial place of business. The manufacture or sale of any item by a tenant from or at a self-service storage facility is specifically prohibited. The applicant is proposing the storage facility/building to be for storage condos which will be for personal use and not for business purposes. b. On site auctions of unclaimed items by the storage facility owners shall be allowed as a temporary use in accord with Chapter 3, Article E, "temporary use requirements",of this Title. The applicant will comply with this if and when this happens at the facility. c. The distance between structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five(25) feet. The applicant meets this standard. d. The storage facility shall be completely fenced, walled, or enclosed and screened from public view. Where abutting a residential district or public road, chainlink shall not be allowed as fencing material. The storage building will have enhanced architecture, and the roll-up doors will screened from public view. This is not a typical storage building as it will be used for storage condos which is a more specialized and heightened use. e. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Not applicable. f. A minimum twenty-five-foot wide landscape buffer shall be provided where the facility abuts a residential use,unless a greater buffer width is otherwise required by this title. Landscaping shall be provided as set forth in subsection I I-3B-9.0 of this Title. Not applicable. g. If the use is unattended,the standards in accord with Section 11-3A-16, "self-service uses", of this Title shall also apply. The applicant will comply with these standards. h. The facility shall have a second means of access for emergency purposes as determined by the Fire Marshal. The fire department has reviewed the concept plan and will work with the applicant on a second means of access. Additional details will be reviewed with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. i. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance.Materials shall not be stored within the required yards. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The applicant is not proposing outdoor storage for the larger self'-storage building. j. The site shall not be used as a"vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein defined. The applicant will comply with this standard. k. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand(1,000) feet from a hospital. Not applicable. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -8- C. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Based on the concept plan, the applicant appears to comply with the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-19. The applicant has positioned no more than 50%of the total off-street parking between building facades and abutting streets.Additionally, the building on the southern portion of the site exceeds the 30%building frontage requirement. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Ten Mile Road, an arterial street. This buffer shall be landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. The applicant has chosen to incorporate the water conserving design standards into this buffer which allows the buffer to be reduced by 50%. The concept plan shows a 12 %foot buffer meeting this requirement. However, the existing landscaping between the sidewalk and Ten Mile Road will be required to be brough into compliance and landscaped per UDC 11-3B-7C. The landscaping will be evaluated with the certificate ofzoning compliance and shall be landscaped per UDC 11-3B-5-2B-0. ii. Parking lot landscaping Landscaping is required to be provided along all parking areas per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8. The proposed landscape plan does not meet the minimum requirements. The south landscape buffer shall be widened to 7 feet and the parking stall shall be reduced to 17 feet. The landscaping will be evaluated with the submittal of the certificate ofzoning compliance. In. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10, the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two (2) ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the final plat detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10C.5. iv. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along N. Ten Mile Road. 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6 requires one space for every two thousand(2,000) sq. ft. of gross floor area in industrial districts. The applicant is proposing 94 parking spaces on the concept plan which exceeds the 23 spaces that are required with the building(46,005 square feet). Additionally, the applicant anticipates potential commercial users will use portions FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -9- of the site in the future which is why the parking is in excess. The uses will be analyzed as they are proposed within the tenant spaces. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1) bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC I1-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC I1-3C-5C.Bicycleparking is not depicted and the plans shall be revised to incorporate the location of the bicycle parking with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance submittal that meet these requirements. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Goals 5.01.02C and 2.09.03A of the comprehensive plan promote area beautification and community identity through heightened design standards providing distinct and engaging identities. In response,the developer is proposing three industrial buildings with a mix of one-and two- story tenant spaces comprised of stucco,brick veneer, stucco wainscot,metal panels,and metal panel roofing with moderate to large setbacks from the street,and frontages exceeding the required 20%windows along the streets. Primary entrances are oriented toward the parking lots rather than toward the loading docks. The Architectural Standards Manual requires modulation in the surface plane at no less than 50 ft. intervals. There should be at least 2 pedestrian-scale architectural features,and physical distinctions to anchor the building. There should be at least two different field materials,with at least one accent material. The proposed elevations appear to meet the architectural manual. However,the applicant shall submit the architectural standards manual checklist with the design review application to ensure compliance with these standards. 5. Fencing (UDC I1-3A-6, I1-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The submitted concept plan shows fencing on the Northwest portion of the site but does not provide details. The applicant shall include fencing details with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. D. Transportation Analysis I. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Goal 6.01.0213 emphasizes reducing the number of access points onto arterial streets by utilizing strategies such as cross-access agreements,access management,and the creation of frontage and backage roads,while also improving connectivity between local and collector streets. Access is proposed off N. Ten Mile Road(an arterial street) through a single curb cut. The applicant has condensed the three access points to N. Ten Mile into a single access point in the center of the property. This was a requirement from both ACHD and the City of Meridian with this application.While this property was not granted access from the storage facility to the south it was granted cross access from the north for when the storage facility redevelops in the future, staff finds the proposed entrance to be in compliance with the UDC and comprehensive plan. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 10- Additionally, cross-access shall be stubbed to the property to the north and south. While this may not be pertinent in the near term, if or when the storage units redevelop,the cross-access agreement will be essential to limiting access points on Ten Mile. The Meridian Fire Department has requested secondary access to the site. The applicant and staff will work with MFD to find the best location for this before CZC submittal. 2. Multiuse Pathways, Pathways, and Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-5, UDC 11-3A-8, UDC 11-3A-17, Comp Plan): The site has an existing detached 5-foot sidewalk along N. Ten Mile Road which has been determined to be sufficient from the city parks department. Typically, 10-foot detached multi- use pathways are required along arterial and collector roads. However,the 5-foot detached sidewalk was recently constructed,and the parks department deemed it as acceptable at this time.Additionally, the two curb cuts that are being removed shall be replace with curb, gutter, sidewalks, and landscaping with the first certificate of zoning compliance application. There is no pedestrian connection from this sidewalk to the front entrances for any of the suites. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian connection point to the entrances of the suites. If the pedestrian walkway crosses vehicular driving surfaces, it is required to be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks asset forth in UDC 11-3A-19B.4. E. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& IV. 3.03.03F. Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer.A final plat or certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6)months of the City Council FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. c. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application(s) shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for this site. d. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, the applicant shall construct driveway stubs to the north and south property lines and record a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granting accesses to the north (Parcel #S0434417201) and south (Parcel #S0434417605)properties in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Ten Mile Road. Copies of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. e. All existing structures shall be removed from the property prior to issuance of the first building permit. f. The applicant shall consolidate all the access points into a single access point as shown on the concept plan. At the submittal of the first certificate of zoning compliance,the access points being removed shall be replaced with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping in compliance with the UDC. g. The property is allowed to develop with any permitted and conditional uses in the I-L zoning district as represented in UDC Table 11-2C-2. Planning Division comments related to future application submittals: - Provide emergency access to the site as requested by the Meridian Fire Department. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 12- B. Meridian Public Works ANNEXATION PUBLIC WORKs DEPARTMENT Wastewater • DistancetoSewer Directly adjacent Services • 5ewer Shed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/concerns Water • Distance to Water Available at the site. Services • Pressure Zone • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Pla n ■ Impacts/Concerns Connection to Ten Mile Rd and to the water main on the south boundary will be required attime of development. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 13- C. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District RECET ED NOV 2 t 20A CITY OF.:N' ITT CLERKS OFLCE G IM3FIR95TREETSOUTH>''�, NAMPA,DAHO&US1 4195 FAX 4209 4634092 r°n $ OFFICE Nanra ;E171 466,7881 \rovembcr 18,2024 S40P NarfPo 20&488-0863 Chris Johnson'CilyClc� City of mcridian 33 F_Broadway avenue, Suite 102 Meridian.ID 83642-2619 RE. I1-207,4-IlilW Fulltty!Rtscrvv.3915 N.Ten Mile Road To Whom It May Concern: Provi4ing all storm drainage is mtHincd ors-site 6cre w°ili be no impact to Nampa& h1Cl'idifflT Irrigation DiStl'ict(NMID).Therefore. no funherreview will he required at this untie. Irony surtarx drainage leaves flit site, NMID rcyuims a tiled Land Use Clumgc Aplilir:gti=rIt for review prior to final platting. All priv�ac Wig Tals and wHAc ways must lbw prolectcd. It is recommended hat irrigation water be available to all dcvelopnTents within NMID. Developers must comply with Idaho Cody 31- 3805. Please call with any further questions at(208)466.0663. Sincerely, Stcvc Pardew De!elopynent Cooi+dinator N�rrnpa& Meddiari Zrrigasirm I]4strict SPA gnf Cc: Office? File AFiR0i9t.Js1E iRkMUnIi�E hC�ES D. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 14- AcHD Akr isPickerirq,Frrsidew Miranda Gold,Vk•-Vr•s109M ]im Hanwrn,Cornmissionor Vent C-Ndtherpe,Comn)m'elow z mw� olive MCKinrwy,CvrnmifliOr*r Date:October 21,2024 To'aeff Hatch and $teve Thiessen, Hatch Architectkire and Ipesign Staff Contact:Sam Sta AM,Assistant Traffic Engineer Project Description: Foldesi Reserve RA Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate223 vehicletrip5 per day, 23vehicle#rips per hour in the PM peak hour,based onthe Institute of Trans pot uof', Engineers Trip Generation Manual,Ilt"edition. Development Meets Yes ? - • s ■ if yes is mitigation mquired Area Rcmdway Level of ■ Planned Service Improvements ■ Yes W Livable Street Performance Measures Area m2ds will meet ACH!D's LOS Planning Thresholds in Pede5trian Yes No IsTransit Available? Tes Comments: As this application is for annexation and rezone only,the tables above reflect existing conditions without the proposed project- Thistable will be updated to reflect the development and its impact as part of a future development application- connecting you to more FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 15- FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the council shall make the following findings: V. I. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant's proposal to annex 1 acre of land with I-L zoning for the development of 46,005 square feet of industrial buildings is consistent with the General Industrial FL UM designation for this property. (See section III above for more information.) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment to I-L and conceptual development plan generally complies with the purpose statement of the I-L district in that it will encourage industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are operated entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures and is accessible to an arterial street (i.e. Ten Mile Road). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed industrial use should be conducted entirely within a structure. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts;and The City Council finds City services are available to beprovided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the city. v1. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommend approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement. B. Commission: B. The Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5�1', 2024. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject annexation request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Steve Thiessen and Jeff Hatch b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Steve Thiessen and Jeff Hatch d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 16- f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony a. None 3. key issue(s) of discussion by Commission: a. None 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. The applicant will no longer pursue storage condos as they do not want to provide secondary access. The building will be used as industrial flex space allowingfor or any use permitted in the zone. C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on Januaa 7`'. 2025. At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject annexation requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public heari= a. In favor: Jeff Hatch and Jared Sherburne b. In opposition: None a Commenting: None d. Written testimony: Robi Foldesi e. Staff 1resenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s) to Commission recommendation; a. None FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 17- EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps to Project Overview) 1. Aerial VII. Legend Project Location "' MCMILLAN� 1� � ■ Area of Impact Analysis FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION& ti fit ' W � j .. Z ORDER FOR . . H-2024-0055) - MCMI�L-L-AN - - am n.., ♦♦ -liii ' mwi♦O'••• �uw. • �•r oil i�.�•*J { . 1♦I �ll'�iii tv�lnob WE rrr•�e�1,, . n ue�/rn,�.♦ ��Iwu ru:�r�11 t• ��,i ihh /�� s �..► 1 !!!1 • n1lBrr /♦ t�PI:J - ►•♦Ia' � In ;L■ 11��- �I Ir ♦ �� ��� � �.Il�ff �r3 it/♦,! 1 l!r � - 11111i�plrr�u ���11111/t!�•��irn W 1�■ a� uu/�a cull► a , q II• a ant♦ Wu.f Or11un��/j 'f;�IIII/I•♦Q��1 U 1 u��♦nnuuariq =�IOIIIj♦i�C t FZ.. Y jj,♦I�i�iiin�r-rr.1 'li sell V i ♦••♦IIIr11���t 1�f1■It�b1� m 1U0�, �•ru1 r �����♦'4j♦hi,♦hi W losses , ,••J, r,,h ij�Ii 1 J USTICK r � "- v umd) rur�j�:.,�°•�• �nub .■a1�♦ ♦ u■■..� ♦ �....../ u umN ■Orr 1♦\.1♦♦♦ /I■n11 ♦♦ ■O P.�Ir♦QUr■i o u q1 y ��nun ♦,♦�,♦♦♦ ■ at■■p Ui IV��♦♦•�♦ ■:�r i::r q♦♦uu.1 u■un♦♦♦a::��Ir.■1. ur�o � ♦��is����lu♦■■ .anu�:mqr • ■ ■.ar■.i•�i♦1 11G�■uwu♦b♦�..�nun ♦ 11'.n /■■ .Un■:■ a un■q••♦♦♦♦� uuu►�.::.■■nn■ i �■• •♦ � ♦: rr u■nurl:/� IIIIl111\♦♦ a•.aau;�unuu■■ '..flaw ■::: r .�.b q♦�1u� / ♦�'apu\luuna mn�-■uuw ... �r p :p�nml4iiuuuiuiiurllun�� n1/uu■�`••��p�♦� p—.r u■■■r loam ' ii �■Z i i r♦i�I ■��riiii� ♦♦♦♦•If�,t��i►i/r�a�♦���1■�f ♦•• . �` �.ununn.♦ uf1■nu•��r♦♦`♦♦�nll r9!r ••♦•♦°gyp•.� ♦O um■■ ♦♦ uunn■1\I ♦♦♦ �a..a��♦i�►i♦��4ia.•. r -- - - �,ljln■,uN ♦ nuuu l mama - : nm rim • SIpU••• Iffil �I illiff ....Ih♦♦� • ��� iii�� isnii 1� biw nl q �Ifr� �17 Via.an not ua1 _ min �♦r♦ nr♦1��Ii�iOp, , ♦♦u �r11� � • , �1 I, ,., Irnprn ►♦ �h♦i� r�rreu♦ - • - • .u�• nn. ru un� �uun■Irr. •�xn4,�ita'...•a■. V ���•••i mom q +Inn Win,PA �.un. 111 �uuun � �♦♦♦♦'1 i`ru n■■ J Ia■o' J 1■■tl,,,,,,,,r flJl� •I♦I` �f$fi�:_ �mr I iiia USTICK r �� . �.■...... -.■■..utniyGA1�1-'l`J .�♦ 11. "fit"0_2 Y'm. u■.untie.. ♦ nu• • _ ■q r .u uuw nn uum► � ■. ■ ��.. l\w■.a.�` 'rr ��.■.�r •�i Inn■ 5.mar(t p nw u■�■.j � ►� aurp i tin,► ■r11�°i O .j�tugv:::.11�• . ..mu■1•��rr �rmrn■.♦♦i••i♦i luryr bwiiiUAi• ~ �� au.■�:�A♦�♦a��s.....♦♦♦+..�u■♦••♦ii a■ul.■uu■u♦ ♦a�' nh.1. =i iiiiiii4►�♦ii' ''�a' :: r♦♦♦�,�♦i f lion♦•r: s■rn �� ►�. a::�•i:'�•♦*♦ .uun■A ■ ■rnnn �:�■■■■::i '•• ■.♦ ♦/ ��\� •♦i■■ ■n■u..rn• ■■■.ter q��•1\I���nuu►♦1♦�■:: uu • �• ♦ 1 n .um.■w u.uuq♦♦ ♦� n ■ ■■ ■■.■ • q• : ♦e .rrrha� unuuL/n • /1♦•O:�•♦rnr;■maw n:.■tin■■ ... ��i � • ��� gtlnnnm ou 11111111\♦ �.� w\fiuun nuaQ:uunu .n ■■::::::��. �•' -C uql .Ilf@Ja, rNpuu� �q*. P �—v■unr�anon ■n .�Qi♦♦■■■„f,� �'• i.7 Imm�mm�u���-` r - u�uiri��♦�r♦a♦•r,►�aar_►fNr•�����1�•: u■ •1♦°1•j♦♦%•ia■� �♦♦♦♦ a+�1 '�� ,•n W.B.q♦ a - • - • ■o■■'I♦,1♦••ra..�a��,%�/i•♦♦iaa�•� 4. Planned Development Map Legend Project Location Area of Impact -� .' T=' City Limits �� � Planned Parcels _r OAnalysisrrn ' h ' I, s - ® EB FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -20- B. Subject1 1 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION . P z L � r r� • ORDER ' (Foldesi C. Service Accessibility Report Overall Score: 17 ]5th Percentile Description Location Within 112 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft. from parcel Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets plan) matches existing(# of lanes) School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLOW Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR Neighborhood Park within REEK 1/4 mile walking FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -22- D. Site Plan(date: 9/20/2024) 517E RECAP .9 M .••••• wwmyt.•.auM.R.�n]�G* Ni. fN BUIIDING e 1 — BUILDING 1 4 's'm"ma"Q•°' SYMBOL LEGEND r 1" 1� �ww.n rcu.s.•.ar €�. ""�� �� 6s I ti =,.�•r s..o��. i BUILDHOAREA RECAP • 1 r --r@ �a•ca w .. R' . I� I V row • a 114 I � BUILDING 1 ` i AREA RECAP I✓ _ 11 OfT �n. vlc nw A L0 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -23- E. Building Elevations(date: 10/31/2024) A� EXTEWUR FINISH '=a-tT'a.' SPECIFICATNS lyzyE IU E ffi3 N � � '•�•ealaaa.urxv� i z .... m o u I0 - _ J o u z L AL m rm l 7 ERM] M.MIMEAN'lob - a - of _- A 4.0 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -2.4- A� FXTURION FINISH St. �D SPCCIfICATIONS t wwr,a�uua am Q e I. p p __ rw.nurm rB:x. V vrc Y rl 1 7 7H FH7 T+ r... WylONfi4 rF1'F 14�+W5 �y�,a�ue�i mo .Lili ply _. -!mrxvc maam�xroa�cR'� ti ® �I � �! a - p le W o u - o _ J ® O 6 ir—In—, Lj A 4.1 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -25- F. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map /�/ ARDURRA Project Nix 240333 Orabc October 10,2024 Pagc 1 of 1 ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION A pared of laird looted in the NV2 of the SE114 of Suction 34,Townsfiip 4 North RvW 1 Wcst Boise Meridian,Oty of Merid'ori Ada County,Idaho.more particularly dcsoibod as hallows: CDMINETKING at the souMcast come of said Section 34,thence'along the cast boundary of the SE114. Al N.00°5759'E,1982B3 fectto the south boundary of said N1I2ofthe 5E114and floc PGNTOF BEGGING:tfrcncr-along said boundary, ]1 N.B9°1610'W_,425.06 tect tlicncc,leaving said boundary. 71 N.01 5T3fl'W_.333.11 tCCt trove 3� S_B9'16'15'E_44157fccttb said cast boundary of the SE114;t}rcmc-alongsaid boundary, 4) S_0752'59'YM_,332761edto the POINT OFBEGINNINU l CEWTAINING_3.31 Ao%—. 1375 liar 0. :9t Cn�j t•.,v-: I[:9:'t; =01.L.L26DO, FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -26- ANNEXATION EXHIBIT SKETCH LOCATED IN THEN V2 OF THESE114 OF SECTION 34, E TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE i VVEST.BOISE MERIOIAN.CITY OF MERIDIAN AIDA CQUIN",IOAHD 2024 C 1f4*----4` — — — 34 :35 ti �974'Sl�f 2d47.30` 43 -a I I � Io 7 � ear 5a+ 1011' � I ANNEXATION PARCEL rr 3.31 ACRES I� I LL mm 11"Irw 425 DW � m G kA ft J r'dr' °f a. 3d 35 W.UtiTIL7i IkCY.41) of 3 2 � o'uktti�' 30044kuuounw Now vca ►RDURR 9 312 IL 9ROADMOflE WAY NAMM OAHO BSBaiY 29B4Q'JOU I WNWARDIIRRAXOM FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -27- E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Mondt Meadows Subdivision H-2024-0067) Between City of Meridian and Riverwood Homes Inc. and Mondt Properties LLC for Property Located at 6101 and 6162 S.Tarrega Ln. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-041186 Boise,Idaho Pgs=75 vbailey 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded I Re-Record Omitting Page 10 and replacing with l0A Omitting page 13 and replacing it with 13A to correct Legal Description and Exhibit. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT I i i 1. City of Meridian PARTIES: 2. Riverwood Homes Inc., Owner/Developer 3. Mondt Properties LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 6th day of June ,2025,by and between City of Meridian,a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and Riverwood Homes Inc., whose address is P.O. Box 344, Meridian, Idaho 83680; and Mondt Properties LLC, whose address is 6162 S. Tarrega Ln., Meridian, Idaho 83642; hereinafter collectively called OWNER/DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the"Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer have submitted an application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to change the future land use designation on 10.28 acres of land from Medium- Density Residential (MDR) to Low-Density Residential (LDR); and annexation and zoning of 10.84 acres of land with a request for the R-2 (Low- Density Residential) (8.48 acres) and R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential District) (2.36 acres) zoning districts on the property as shown in Exhibit"A" under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS,the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0067) Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 2 of 75 i Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-039391 Bolse,Idaho Pgs=72 0alley 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded i Re-record Omitting Page 10 and replacing with 10A; Omitting page 13 and replacing with 13A to correct DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description and Exhibit s PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Riverwood Homes Inc., Owner/Developer 3. Mondt Properties LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 24th day of June ,2025,by and between City of Meridian,amunicipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and Riverwood Homes Inc.,whose address is P.O. Box 344,Meridian, Idaho 83680; and Mondt Properties LLC, whose address is 6162 S. Tarrega Ln., Meridian, Idaho 83642; hereinafter collectively called OWNER/DEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit"A,"which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the"Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer have submitted an application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to change the future land use designation on 10.28 acres of land from Medium- Density Residential (MDR) to Low-Density Residential (LDR); and annexation and zoning of 10.84 acres of land with a request for the R-2(Low- Density Residential) (8.48 acres) and R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential District) (2.36 acres) zoning districts on the property as shown in Exhibit"A" under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to I how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS,the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0067) PAGE 1 Or 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 3 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 2 of 72 j th 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 13 day of May, 2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Riverwood Homes Inc., whose address is P.O. Box 344, Meridian, Idaho 83680; and Mondt Properties LLC, whose address is 6162 S. Tarrega Ln., Meridian, Idaho 83642; hereinafter collectively called OWNER/DEVELOPER, the party that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. T)FVFT.OPM-RNT AGRFRW.NT—MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0067) PAGE 2 OF 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 4 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 3 of 72 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right i to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, phasing plan, and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section IV of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and the provisions contained herein. b. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures that face Sublimity Avenue shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g., projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. c. No building permits shall be issued prior to the plat being recorded. d. The Open Space amenities shall meet the following requirements: the picnic area shall include tables, benches, landscaping, and a structure for shade; and the outdoor fire ring shall meet fire safety standards, is located on a noncombustible surface, and includes fixed seating. e. The property owners of parcel(s) S 1131346650 and S 1131346605 shall relinquish their rights to access and utilize the private road Tarrega Lane. Written documentation shall be submitted prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat. f. The existing homes shall connect to City water and sewer service within 60 days of it becoming available and disconnect from private service, as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. g. The single-family structure on parcel S 1131346605 located at 6162 Tarrega Lane can remain in its current location once the following easements have been relinquished: - There is a thirty (30) foot wide access easement (Inst. # 7520424 & 2021-049475)that runs across the north boundary of both parcels in the project, as well as the west thirty (30) feet of each parcel. These easements are no longer required and will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat. I)F.vF.T.oPMF.NT AC;RF.F.ww—MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0067) PAGE 3 OF 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 5 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 4 of 72 - The existing thirty (30) foot wide access easement (Inst. # 9037915), which runs across the east 302.15 feet of the south boundary of parcel S 1131346650,will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat due to the public road improvements in the same location. h. Written documentation to relinquish the easements listed above shall be submitted prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat. i. Lot 1,Block 1 shows a future development. This development shall align with the proposed roadway connection from the development (Skyranch Subdivision) to the west. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. nUUM nUXAFNT A(-RpppkfRNT—MONMT MF.AT)OW.,STTTTT)TVT.oTow(14-2024-0067) PAGE 4 OF 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 6 of 75 j Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 5 of 72 I 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall, immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the Property by the City Council.If for any reason after such recordation,the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified snail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 nuNmr(ImA-pNT A(:RFFMFNT—M0T TIT MFAT)0Ws S RT)TVTSTnN(H-2024-0067) PAGE 5 OF 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 7 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 6 of 72 OWNER/DEVELOPER: OWNER/DEVELOPER: Riverwood Homes Inc. Mondt Properties LLC P.O. Box 344 6162 S. Tarrega Ln. Meridian, Idaho 83680 Meridian, Idaho 83642 i 14.1 A parry shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property ("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time, provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property,which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 21. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. np,upr nPm-P ITT A r i?PPv ANT-MnNnT MRAT)nWC STTRT)TVTSToN(H-202.4-0067) PAGE 6 OF 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 8 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 7 of 72 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing rezoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; acknowledgements, signatures and Exhibits A and B follow] T)PVFT nPMFNT AmzPPmT TT-MnTMT MRAnnwS STMT)TVTSTON(H-2024-0067) PAGE 7 OF 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 9 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 8 of 72 i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein,executed this agreement and trade it effective as hereinabove provided. l OWNER/DEVELOPER: verwood Homes Inc. i By (name): ��,,,,► 1aG�t�s�--� Its(title): State of Idaho ) ss: County of Ada ) T On this t da of�J t/�t/��- 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary PuWic in arld for said State, personally appeared a cA 'T�tot&sov,, known or identified to me to be the of Riverwood Homes Inc.and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. INN' WITNESS WHEREOF, I }jjj jereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. �N . A T4,"A� �•- Notary Public S r. i My Commission Expires: Sj.%titi+r `N" 4TE~of OWNER/DEVELOPER: Mondt Properties LLC By(name):RTtGfn L • GA e-IHOMe/%L MA=NUMBER201812240 Its (title); l COMMISSI81228fnfmV NOSTState of Idaho ) My Comm07M ss: County of Ada ) On this day of Iuty- ,2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared :Art hXT,-/Y-n-m— n G,ltiAnown or identified to me to be the of Niondt Properties LLC and the perbon who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. iy - bliciCommission Expires:_ c� DEVELOPMENTAGREEMIiNT-MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0067) PAGR 8 OF 9 Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 10 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 9 of 72 CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: C iJ 3L` ,`ar `4• . By. SFAI._J Mayor Robe E. S rnison 6-24-2025 Chris Johnso City ""`6-24-2025 State of Idaho ) ss County of Ada ) On this 24th day of June ,2025,before me,a Notary Public,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson, known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho' My Commission Expire -28-2028 CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 11 of 75 EXHIBIT A ACCURATE OEM SURVEYING & MAPPING `Pe V i 0- J No. 23-257 Exterior Boundary Description A parcel of Ian being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarte of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 Ea t of the Boise Meridian, Meridian, Idaho, being more particul ly described as follows: BEGINNING at the foun 2 inch aluminum capon a 5/8 inch iron pin stamp d PLS 11463 at the Center-South Sixteenth Corner of Sectio 31,T. 3 N., R. 1 E.,from which the found 5/8 ' ch iron pin with plastic cap labeled PLS 12459 at the Quarter Cor r common to Sections 31&6 bears S 0 ° 15' 54"W a distance of 1341.76 feet; Thence along the east boundary 'ne of the said Southeast Quarter the Southwest Quarter of Section 31 S 00° 15' 54"W for a distance of 391.80 et to a found 5/8th inch iron n with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence S 00° 15' 54"W a distance of 391. feet to a foun /8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 133.61 feet along a curve to the right,sai u e having a radius of 523.50 feet,a central angle of 140 37' 23" and a long chord bearing N 82°25' 25" W a dis ce of 133.25 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 75°06'43"W for a distance of 94.3 feet to a fo nd 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 122.44 feet along a curve to the ft,said curve having a dius of 476.50 feet,a central angle of 14°43' 21" and a long chord bearing N 820 28' 4" W a distance of 122.1 eet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 114 3; Thence continuing N 890 50' 04" for a distance of 308.87 feet to a fou d 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11 63; Thence N 89°49'59"W fo a distance of 653.49 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron ' with a plastic cap labeled PLS 11463; Thence N 00°06' 14" for a distance of 334.40 feet to a found stone monument wit a chiseled "X"; Thence S 89°51' 3" E for a distance of 1309.14 feet to a found 5/8111 inch iron pin with a nch aluminum cap stamped PLS 1 463,said corner being the Center-South 1/16th Corner the POINT OF BEGIN NG; Said parcel ontains 10.278 acres, more or less. ND 114 3 1 y 1520 W. Washington St., Boise, ID 83702 m Phone: 208-488-4227 e>nj,�Z'12•L 1 q www,accuratesurveyors.com OF Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 12 of 75 CORRECTED EXHIBIT A ACCOUBMTE OMEN= SURVEVIN0 & M A P P I N 0 � i sF R V I O Job No. 23-257 Exterior Boundary Description A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Meridian, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the found 2 inch aluminum cap on a 5/8 inch iron pin stamped PLS 11463 at the Center-South Sixteenth Corner of Section 31,T.3 N., R. 1 E.,from which the found 5/8 inch iron pin with plastic cap labeled PLS 12459 at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 31&6 bears S 00°15'54"W a distance of 1341.76 feet; Thence along the east boundary line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31 S 00° 15'54"W for a distance of 391.80 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 133.61 feet along a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 523,50 feet,a central angle of 140 37' 23" and a long chord bearing N 82°25'25"W a distance of 133.25 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 75°06'43"W for a distance of 94.39 feet to a found 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 122.44 feet along a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 476.50 feet,a central angle of 14'43' 21" and a long chord bearing N 82°28' 24"W a distance of 122.10 feet to a found 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 Inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence continuing N 89'50'04"W for a distance of 308.87 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 89'49'59"W for a distance of 653.49 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 11463; Thence N 00°06' 14"W for a distance of 334,40 feet to a found stone monument with a chiseled "X"; Thence S 89'51'33" E for a distance of 1309.14 feet to a found 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463,said corner being the Center-South 1/16th Corner the POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 10.278 acres, more or less. 11463 1 �•�r�OF%'D 1520 W. Washington St., Boise, ID 83702 m Phone: 208-488-4227 wm.accu rates u rveyors.co m p f b A Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 13 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 11 of 72 I i i i i EXHIBIT MAP A PORTION OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SE 114 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 31, T.3N., R.IE., B.M. ADA COUNTY—STATE OF IDAHO CHISELED "X" „ , IN STONE S 89 51'33 E 1309.14 P.O.B. C—S SCALE: 1"=200' 1116TH O Z io `r 10.278tAC oM o cz >� Q) m N ¢o o �m , ^ m N89'49'59"W 653.49 308.87 3 W co LEGEND C2 o 0 BOUNDARY LINE S 75'06'43" E io u o w —--—--— SECTION LINE 94. 39 o m o PARCEL LINE FOUND 2" ALUMINUM CAP IN ASPHALT • FOUND 518" IRON PIN, 3�jl N 89"4224" W 2490.40' 311/4CORNER WITH PLASTIC CAP, AS NOTEDT.3N. R.1E_B_M.FOUND 518" IRON PIN WITH CORNER E LAKE HAZEL RD. T.2 N. R.1.E B.M. 6 2" ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 R.1 W.IR.1 E. • FOUND 112" IRON PIN, WITH PLASTIC CAP, PLS 4725 O SET 518"IRON PIN W1 TH 2" ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 P,O,B, POINT OF BEGINNING �`'\pNG�STFRO sG� CURVE TABLE �� �� �° o �u CECU&ATE MAPPINO 1146,32 1520 W.Washington St. CURVE I ARC LENGTH I RADIUS I DELTA ANGLE I CHORD BEARING I CHORD LENGTH Boise,Idaho 83702 C1 122.44' 476.50' 14'43'21" S 82'28'24" E 122.10' r�ql£ �OQ�o (208)488-4227 C2 133.61' 523.50' 14'37'23" S 82'25'25" E 133.25' N OF G www.accuratesurveyors.com DATE.DEC,2024 JOB 24-244 P I� Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 14 of 75 EXHIBIT A (R2 ZONE) cp ACCURATE SURVEYING & MAPPING s�R V Job No. 24-244 i Description for Re-Zoning A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: i BEGINNING at the found 2 inch aluminum cap on a 5/8 inch iron pin stamped PLS 11463 at the Center-South Sixteenth Corner of Section 31,T.3 N., R. 1 E.,from which the found 5/8 inch iron pin with plastic cap labeled PLS 12459 at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 31&6 bears S 00' 15'54"W a distance of 1341.76 feet; Thence S 89° 51' 33" E for a distance of 62.50 feet to a point on the centerline of S.Sublimity Ave.as shown in the proposed plat of Apex Northwest Subdivision#4, Page 2, Block 14; Thence S 00° 15'54" W along the centerline of said S.Sublimity Ave. for a distance of 391.80 feet; Thence N 89'51' 33" W for a distance of 62.50 feet to a found 5/8 inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 133.61 feet along a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 523.50 feet, a central angle of 14'37' 23" and a long chord bearing N 820 25' 25" W a distance of 133.25 feet to a found 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 75'06' 43"W for a distance of 94.39 feet to a found 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 122.44 feet along a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 476.50 feet,a central angle of 14'43' 21" and a long chord bearing N 82°28' 24"W a distance of 122.10 feet to a found 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence continuing N 89'50' 04" W for a distance of 308.87 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 4725; Thence N 890 49' 59" W for a distance of 346.90 feet to a set 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 00' 10'01" E for a distance of 334.54 feet to a set 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence S 890 51' 33" E for a distance of 1000.97 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463,said corner being the Center-South 1/16th Corner the POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 8.480 acres, more or less. � G 11463 N,,1.2�•tS�o hog", l 2 y�yjyQ°� ' 1 N J. 1520 W. Washington St., Boise, ID 83702 s Phone: 208-488-4227 www.accuratesurveyors.com Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 15 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 j 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 13 of 72 i i i i EXHIBIT MAP A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SE 1 4 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 31, T.3N., R.JE., M. ADA COUNTY—STATE OF IDAHO S 8951'33" E 1/16TH P.O SCALE: 1"=200' LEGEND 1000. 1LU 1 1 —-- BOUNDARY LINE o 3 �¢ m —--— SEC1/ON LINE a I � 0 7.918�AC, Q ^ o ,o w F PARCEL LINE v j FOUND 2" ALUMINUM CAP Z M O I o o IN ASPHALT a(ri a • FOUND 5/8"IRON PIN, ro Q I (n (3 Q WITH PLAS77C CAP, AS NOTED 346.90' ' ' " FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN NTH N 89 49,5 W \2490.'4 I a o 2"ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 • FOUND 1/2" IRON PIN, WITH C2 L2 0 PLAS77C CAP, PLS 4725 5 06'43" E- O SET 5/8"IRON PIN WITH 94.39' 1 2"ALUM/NUM CAP, PLS 1146J \ 1 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING \ CALCULATED POINT 36131 ___N 89 42 \ 31 1/4 CORAER T.3N. R.1 E. B.M. 1 1 6 S CT70N CORNER E. LAKE HAZEL RD. T.2N. R.1.E B.M. 6 LINE TABLE R,1W.IR,1 . LINE BEARING DISTANCE L L1 S 89'51'33" E 62,50' \ S G ACCURATE L2 N 89'S1 33" W 62.50' �� G� SURVEYING & MAPPING CURVE TABLE a 1146 1520 W.Washington St. s �`��•LS'O Boise,Idaho 83702 27 CURVE ARC LENGTH IUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH qIF �pP� (208)esurve488 or OF www.accuratesurveyorscom Cl 122.44' 6.50' 14'43'21" S 82-28.24" E 122.10' �9lhrgN J.pP�� C2 133.61' 523.50' 14'37'23" S 82-25-25" E 133.25' DATE.• 2024 JOB24-244 D`" Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 16 of 75 Corrected Exhibit Replacement NOISMIGGnS 1S3M X3dV 03SOdOYd Ui N 3A d AIIPV1780S 'S 30 0 o� T p 3NI783IN30 03SOdONcl U Sro 1 2 M „t9,S1.00 S 4 O .I r 09*16f -N,.I i+ 3 6 0 z ,09'16f ,96'6fi6 Nm o u m N U M „P9,91.00 S m mLN aNIZlb38 Yo sisda �EyOR o N C� Ct t,)l N -fit It Wo -� m z i �021d W _ 00 ~ 0 U Q) N 1 LQ I ZM W 'N z � N � 0 cn CIO oc� M w o N I LLJ c'Ci ova lo„ SON �I � z33 aW I rn ZIW .00 W O I N N �L I N <V 00 W� O O z O U z z U Q) 3Q Z oLd LLJ Q � 3 „10,01.00 N dNN w J d M w :j Z LQ J a W obb tp 4CJ rn U �C Z J a O ^ Z o o 0 (0 r) z ° v � Z � � � t' niq 9 � L m a � ae � a� o � � LU 04r IO QvpZJ :4U Ztij O LU -w s3 Q U W _j a N��Q ,jz�U � c Q z_ inLO ~ J tO p OJ O j U j 000 00 Z) � q U M W z LU I �z ��s � NlOia �N m U �+. w e Pao ►3� Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 17 of 75 i EXHIBIT A (R4 ZONE) r�� e` i by 1 'Am Co'C U RAT E allow now z SURVEYING & MAPPING Job No. 23-257 Description for Re-Zone A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Meridian, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the found 2 inch aluminum cap on a 5/8 inch iron pin stamped PLS 11463 at the Center-South Sixteenth Corner of Section 31,T.3 N., R. 1 E.,from which the found 5/8 inch iron pin with plastic cap labeled PLS 12459 at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 31&6 bears S 000 15'54"W a distance of 1341.76 feet; thence N 89°51' 33"W a distance of 1000.97 feet to a set 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 000 10'01" W for a distance of 334.54 feet to a set 5/81h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 89'49' 59"W for a distance of 306.59 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 11463; Thence N 00°06' 14" W for a distance of 334.40 feet to a found stone monument with a chiseled "X"; Thence S 890 51' 33" E for a distance of 308.17 feet to a set 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463,the POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 2.360 acres or 102,809 square feet, more or less. � D 11463 a F 0 N J. ©P Pa �� 1520 W. Washington St., Boise, ID 3702 m Phone: 208-488-4227 www.accu ratesurveyors,com Instrument # 2025-041186 07/01/2025 09:54:25 AM Page 18 of 75 Instrument # 2025-039391 06/25/2025 08:16:27 AM Page 15 of 72 i i EXHIBIT MAP A PORT70N OF LAND LYING WI THIN THE SE 114 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 31, T.3N., R.IE, B.M. ADA COUNTY—STATE OF IDAHO CHISELED "X" IN STONE N 89 51'33" W 1309.14' 308,17' P,O.B, 1000.97' 1116 TH SCALE: 1"=200' 3 N 89 5133" W 0 - O ^ o 2.360_fAC, o m M O � o z m� Z v1 e y 306.59' N. m �;k W N 89 4959" W Q O Q pp 4 SECTION CORNER 1/4 CORNER 36131 __ N 89'4224" W 2490.40' T.3N. R.1 E. B.M. 31 LEGEND 1 16 - E. LAKE HAZEL RD. T.2N. R,1.E B.M. 6 BOUNDARY LINE R'1 W.I R,1 E. —--—--— SECTION LINE PARCEL LINE 6M FOUND 2" ALUMINUM CAP IN ASPHALT FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN, WITH PLAS77C CAP, AS N07ED 1 D FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN WITH i G ACCURATE ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 t� �� F • FOUND 1/2" IRON PIN, W17N o S 0 R V E Y! I G & hI A P P!R G PLASTIC CAP, PLS 4725 IL 1146 3 1520 W.Washington St. O SET 5/8" IRON PIN WITH �IZ•It�l.p Boise,Idaho 83702 27 2" ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 �� \�P (208)esurve or ti OF G www.accuratesurveyors.com P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING AN J.DP� DATE.'DEC,2024 JOB24-244 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN%-~' AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for annexation,Comprehensive Plan map amendment, and preliminary plat,by Gregg Davis,Breckon Land Design. Case No(s).H-2024-0067 For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 6, 2025 (Findings on May 13,2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6,2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6,2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6,2025,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6,2025, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AZ,CPAM,PP-FILE#H-2024-0067) - 1 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation, Comprehensive Plan map amendment, and preliminary plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6, 2025,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 1 I-613-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1 I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1, the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two (2) year period.Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AZ,CPAM,PP-FILE#H-2024-0067) -2- City Code Title I l(UDC 11-513-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may, within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted,including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code.This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-652 1(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6,2025 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AZ,CPAM,PP-FILE#H-2024-0067) -3 - By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 13 day of_May 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE_ COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. 'm' on 5-13-2025 Attest: /, SF,AL Chris Johns 5 3-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. �� 5-13-2025 By: C)nad-ol'.6i 4 _Dated: City Clerk's Office (31 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AZ,CPAM,PP-FILE#H-2024-0067) -4- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 5/6/2025 Legend - DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council Area of Impact �= City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 lritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Gregg Davis,Breckon Land Design SUBJECT: H-2024-0067 Mondt Meadows Subdivision AZ, , CPAM,PP LOCATION: 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Lane,located . the SE '/4 of the SW'/4 of Section 31, _ T.3N,RJE,Parcels S1131346650 and S1131346605 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary • Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map(CPAM)to change the future land use designation on 10.28-acres of land from Medium Density Residential(MDR)to Low Density Residential(LDR); • Annexation of 10.84-acres of land from RUT in Ada County to the R-2 (8.48 acres)and R-4 (2.36 acres)zoning districts; and • A Preliminary Plat consisting of 11 building lots(10 new and 1 existing)and 4 common lots on 10.28-acres of land in the proposed R-2 and R-4 zoning districts. B. Issues/Waivers • The Future Land Use Map designates this area as Medium Density Residential. The property owner is requesting a change to Low Density Residential to allow for larger estate lots, consistent with the existing development pattern in the area,with the intent of preserving the property for future generations. • The existing house is within a thirty(30) foot access easement to the north and thirty(30) foot access easement to the west. These easements will need to be relinquished or vacated before the City Engineer signs the final plat. • Per UDC 11-3A-6,in Residential Districts,irrigation easements wider than ten(10) feet shall be included in a common lot that is a minimum of twenty(20) feet wide and outside of a fenced area,unless otherwise waived by City Council. There is a 30-foot-wide irrigation easement along the northern portion of the property,which is required to be placed in a common lot unless the requirement is waived by Council or documentation is provided showing the easement has been relinquished by the owner. • Council waiver to leave the private drainage ditch(Watkins Ditch)that runs along the eastern portion of the property open within a thirty-eight(38) foot wide easement. C. Recommendation Staff. Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map, annexation and preliminary plat per the provisions in Section IV in accord with the Findings in Section V. D. Decision Approval City of Meridian I Department Report L Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1• Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing Zoning Rural Urban Transition(RUT VII.A2 Proposed Zoning R-2 and R-4 Adopted FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Low Density Residential Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 11/5/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 11/21/2024 Site posting date 4/7/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.G • Comments Received Yes,Staff Report - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Sublimity Avenue - • Traffic Level of Service See Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics - ITD Comments Received No Comment or Concern Meridian Fire Turnaround shall be in accordance with 2018 International Fire Code,Appendix D,and shall meet the minimum specifications of 96'exclusive of shoulders and curbs. Meridian Police No Comment Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site • Impacts or Concerns See Site Specific Conditions of Approval Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Water is available at the site • Impacts or Concerns No Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received.Mondt Meadows Subdivision AZ,CPAM,PP H-2024-0067 (copy this link into a separate browser). City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S1131346650 Date Retrieved:2025/1/3 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 485 1,044 Surrounding Area 45% Not City g ® City Limits ■ Not City Household Change Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:113.9% Population 723717172, ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses o% ■ Single-family is 7% Multi-family 190% ® Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 1000 2000 3000 0 10 20 30 40 ■ Single-far-nily ❑ Multi-family City of Meridian I Department Report IL Community Metrics 2.00 500 Single-family H fA 4T 1.50 Residential U Parcel Diversity (A1.0o u° 0Parcel Count in 0.50 0.54 L m 0 09 a lw *Average Acres 0.00 0 0 0.16 0 R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 OResidential Net Density a 10.00 11.49 p 5.00 O6.29 1.85 5,94 • 0.00 �o.00 Dwelling Units / Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH) Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service "State Highway 0-feet Arterial 1.7 NA 69.1k.leridian Road " Lake Hazel Road 0-feet Principal Arterial 167 Better than `E- "Sublimity Avenue 47-feet Collector N/A NiA " Acceptable level of service for a two-lane principal arterial is"E" (690 VPH)_ *Acceptable level of service for a five-lane principal arterial is "E" (1,780 VPH). Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is "D" (425 VPH). **ACHD does not set level of service thresholds for State Highways. 2. Average Daily Traffic Count (VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts_ • The average daily traffic count for SH-69 (N-leridian Road) south of Amity Road was 39,548 on October 8, 2024. • The average daily traffic count for Lake Hazel Road east of SH-69 was 3,747 on June '12, 2018. Since these counts were taken Lake Hazel Road from SH-69.Meridian Road to Locust Grove Road has been widened to 5-lanes. • There are no existing traffic counts for Sublimity Avenue north of Lake Hazel Road_ Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report IL Community Metrics Figure 3: Service Impact Summary Service Impact Tools Ready 0 0101 Caution o�ye o\`�e �a�y a ��� �'b Q`� �a\� �. °aa Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The current Future Land Use Map(FLUM)designation for the properties is Medium Density Residential and the zoning district is RUT as the property is located within Ada County. The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment(CPAM)to change the FLUM from MDR to LDR to accommodate zoning that allows large and estate lots at gross densities of three dwelling units or less per acre. Low Density Residential is adjacent to the property to the north,Mixed Use Regional(MU-RG)is to the west and Medium Density Residential is to the east and south of the proposed project. After reviewing the comprehensive plan and nearby properties, staff believes the requested Low Density Residential designation is appropriate given the proximity to the existing large estate development to the north.Additionally,the Low Density Residential FLUM designation,which already exists to the north of this property, further supports this recommendation. Medium Density Residential: The Comprehensive Plan identifies Medium Density Residential land uses as the development of dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park,school,or land dedicated for public services. Low Density Residential: The Comprehensive Plan identifies Low Density Residential land uses as the development of single-family homes on large and estate lots at gross densities of three dwelling units or less per acre. These areas often transition between existing rural residential and urban properties. Developments need to respect agricultural heritage and resources,recognize view sheds and open spaces,and maintain or improve the overall atmosphere of the area. The use of open spaces,parks,trails,and other appropriate means should enhance the character of the area. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park,school,or land dedicated for public services. Staff's analysis of the CPAM request are as follows: 1. Alignment with Existing Uses: • The current use of large estate residential lots aligns more appropriately with the Low Density Residential(LDR)designation,which accommodates lots ranging from 8,000 to 12,000 square feet or larger. 2. Compatibility and Planning Goals: • R-2 and R-4 Zone Suitability: The proposed zoning is consistent with the characteristics of large estate lots,mirroring similar developments to the north and south. • Surrounding Zoning: - The properties to the north and south are zoned Rural Urban Transition(RUT). - The northern property,designated for Low-Density Residential use,is planned for R-4 zoning. - The southern property remains RUT with a minimum lot size of five acres. - The proposed R-2 and R-4 zoning aligns with existing land use patterns and zoning designations. 3. Site Design and Community Impact: • The Low Density Residential designation supports the continued development of large estate lots, fostering a cohesive and compatible land use pattern. • Adjusting the Future Land Use Map(FLUM)to LDR maintains consistency with existing uses and complements surrounding residential development. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Given the proximity of large residential estate lots to the north and south,staff finds the proposed Low Density Residential FLUM designation appropriate for this location. Table 4:Proiect Overview Description Details History Parcel S 1131346605 was created through a property boundary adjustment through Ada County. Phasing Plan 2 phases Residential Units 11 (10 new and 1 existing) Open Space Provided: .63 acres/l2%—Required: .42 acres/8%R-2 Provided: .43 acres/16%-Required: .32 acres/12%R-4 Amenities 2 amenity points/ Physical Features Watkins Drainage Ditch Acreage 10.28(R-2:7.89 acres and R-4:2.36 acres) Lots 11 building lots(10 new, 1 existing)and 4 common lots Density 1.26 dwelling units per acre B. History The property resides within Ada County and is currently zoned RUT. The property owner recorded a property boundary adjustment on January 16,2024,to reconfigure the lot lines in order to subdivide the norther half of their property. See Record of Survey below. RECORD OF SURVEY COLINTY RECORDERS CERTFnATE �ARY LM'E AOA/SIM NT FOR MAnW WT A PMnON LY L—LVVYG MRMN UE NE V4 01 i_ x�a T °nm.urrA 1e24-m2kSs 7NF SF I/s OF 7!Q SW 1/A OF S£Cn0N Jr.79L..R.f£..B.M r.Lp Ac�mo $TMs�.AaeP+2 merWiwv a.whir ADA COUNTY—STATE OF DAHO ns`On'W`� "yrrg'Eyrr o.W.r.c'xr w SUAfEP WFW 51r6blWSION � m �x' - r.w.., Iu . rAem ` REFERENCES � i rl•^ R/- OE£G•ul5i.Nw T�Tr-wGi Sf �TI FW3'x12T AG.r BASIS OF BEARING ' LEGEND s 5s.s z.•w 3£Tw£cr+rowro _ ArprrvwEN TS Al W S Clw COMMCR CderON 10 .]*. A 8 AN0 RYF f/s CORN{x corr,fON TO F ��S' r ��'�+sJ'P raw a•utw.w w °,wvt u�r SURVEYOR'S MARRA TIVE: 8 Aa LM• 'T°•�v�_ fe w.Rw.0 -an TH.yorpofw o/M0 i I P AQ'A • /•'.wOW rM!Ax. avr Y M fo 1 f} . wM A.aSFC CA..A•f fpR9 rf�fMli..N /Yu.And I w"Q ---------- ..f , RISO MIAAM.UA �TML w• M9;lM.f 55a. f,.o r�•wP, �ro�.mar � I � .�u•W,�.f�'m N U'40'59'M 3p}.50' s. R a MOMnvc AccuRArE w AiaNcTMAPvwc i S g - CflNWWATE OF SURVEYOR pP NON-C MMLMwCF 1H Gtt W aoA,p, �' of M4f w'Ml rM ANp/OA COUrvtt OwAwrANCF5 y . Mwu>RD Z. u.Canw.w+kwlu+mu PFRTAvnNG TO TNF rSSIlAMCE W R !n rF'AAp AeL.aYn. m ss-rear fr.np.35-t61T M RE a A.'SOsv -r7ao0•T -' L- JOF..W $ r7egr' S.S' lime:ooFs Noi sFnirs A s ttae3s•F ++aow3r•w esz.r EPa FCAL nFscnvrraw fcW RRF ;n R r.L.z n.FJ �•wi1�PARLFLS SNOwN MFRFLW- �� j I c... CURVE TABLE 6 F~ 0.rL115 ItlRO 9EVdlC C $I ACCURATE --- 8 L1S6•BAas�xn_-----------c)w_w.r.xw r w.IF.F 1--L..— —t�6 V,rmr. - --------s evvY+�•c iiw.m� . . e.M. ��•:,an.�ai�a �UFF11m.CE3lzy[ nr vr. na,rm FFF T 4et NM.A(rYr.InU.lpwAdR City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis There are existing easements on the property that are being proposed to be relinquished. • There is a thirty(30) foot wide access easement(Instrument No. 7520424&2021- 049475),that runs across the north boundary of both parcels in the project,as well as the west thirty(30) feet of each parcel. These easements are no longer required and will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat. • The existing thirty(30) foot wide access easement,(Instrument No. 9037915),which runs across the east 302.15' of the south boundary of parcel S 1131346650 will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat due to the public road improvements in the same location. • Dry ditch that runs through parcel S 1131346650 along the east side needs to be either depicted on the plat map within an easement or provide written documentation showing the dry ditch had been abandoned and is no longer in use by the affected property owners. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The current use of the property is residential with two (2) existing structures. The plat map shows the structure on Lot 1, Block 3 of the proposed plat as an existing shop. However, Ada County Assessor describes the structure as a single-family dwelling.Lot 1, Block 3 is not eligible for another residential unit unless the existing structure is removed or converted to a secondary dwelling and meets all the UDC requirements. The existing strucutres will be required to connect to city services and the existing wells and septic system will need to be abandoned as required. Lot 1, Block I shows a future development, this development shall align with the proposed roadway connection from the development(Skyranch Subdivision) to the west. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (Comp Plan 2.01.01 C, UDC 11-2): The applicant is proposing single-family detached homes which are listed as a principal permitted use in UDC Table 11-2A-2 for the R-2 and R-4 zoning districts. The project will be developed in two phases. The developer provided a future layout showing how the property will be redeveloped. The future phase roadway shall align with the approved project to the west, Skyranch Subdivision. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C allows for a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): • In the R-2 zoning district, a twenty(20)foot landscape buffer is required along Sublimity Avenue and a ten (10)foot landscape buffer is required along E. Escalation Drive. The maximum building height for this area is thirty-five (35)feet with an interior setback of 7.5 feet per story and a rear setback of fifteen (I5)feet. The minimum street frontage is eighty(80)feet. • The dimensional standards for the R-4 zone are the same as the R-4 except the interior setback is five (5)feet and minimum street frontage is sixty(60)feet. D. Design Standards Analysis The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 and 11-2A-7 for the R-2 and R-4 zoning districts. The proposed lots comply with the dimensional standards of the above-mentioned districts. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 1. Existing Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan 5.01.02A, UDC 11-3A-19): The current use of the property is residential with two (2)residential properties existing. The structures will remain and the existing well and septic system will be abandoned as required. City utilities are required to be extended to serve the proposed development. Comprehensive Plan Policy 5.01.02A requires the applicant to maintain and implement community design ordinances, quality design criteria, and complete street policies to set quality standards citywide. 2. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan 2.02.00, Comp Plan 2.02.0IB, UDC II- 3G): Based on the standards in UDC Table 11-3G-3, a minimum of 8% (or 0.42-acres)for the R- 2 zoning district and 0%for the R-4 zoning district, as it is less than five (5) acres in size) of qualified open space is required to be provided within the development.An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.F, that depicts 9.65%(or 0.988-acres) of open space that meets the required quality and qualified open space standards. Based on the standards in UDC 11-3G-4A, a minimum of two (2) amenity points are required as the overall project is ten (10) acres in size. The amenities proposed are an outdoor fire ring, picnic table, bench and picnic shelter.All common open space areas are required to be landscaped with one deciduous shade tree for every 5,000 square feet of area and include a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover per UDC 11-3G-5B.3. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.00 requires the applicant to plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.0IB requires the applicant to evaluate open space and amenity requirements for consistency with community needs and values. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets UDC 11-2A-6 requires a twenty(20)foot wide buffer along collector roads (Sublimity Avenue). The adjacent developer to the east will be installing the landscape along Sublimity Avenue as part of their project approval. ii. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10,the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two (2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees,or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways, within common open space,and when used as focal elements in landscape design. If trees are proposed to be removed from the property that meet the criteria listed above, the applicant shall add a mitigation section to the landscape plan with final plat submittal. In. Storm integration Per UDC 11-313-11,the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural,effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated,well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis stormwater facilities into required landscape areas,where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. Development will be required to meet UDC 11-3B-11 for stormwater integration. iv. Pathway landscaping Landscaping for pathways shall meet the requirements outlined in UDC 11-3B-12. The applicant is required to provide a landscape strip a minimum of five(5) feet wide shall along each side of the pathway. Designs are encouraged in which the width of the landscape strip varies to provide additional width to plant trees farther from the pathway,preventing root damage. The minimum width of the landscape strip shall be two (2) feet to allow for maintenance of the pathway. The landscape strips shall be planted with a mix of trees, shrubs,lawn,and/or other vegetative ground cover. There are no pathways required or being proposed for this development. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. On-street parking is also available on the proposed streets. i. Residential parking analysis The proposal will be required to meet the standards for parking as set forth in UDC H- 3C-6. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan 2.01.01 C,Architectural Standards Manual): Eight(8) conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed subdivision as shown in Exhibit VII.H. The applicant states the homes in the Mondt Meadows Subdivision will include ten (10) homes with a mix of different product types, two-story and single-story detached single-family homes. Buildings shall be designed with elevations that create interest through the use of broken planes, windows, and fenestrations that produce a rhythm of materials and patterns. Design review is not required for single-family detached structures. However, because the rear and/or sides of homes facing Sublimity Avenue will be highly visible, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs), bays, banding,porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from adjacent public streets. Single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The landscape plan shows a six(6)foot tall solid vinyl privacy fencing along the perimeter of the plat and a six(6)foot open vision fence along the common area on the east side of the project. Per UDC 11-3A-7.A.3, barbed wire fencing is prohibited. The applicant shall work with the neighboring property owner to remove the existing fence and replace it with a fence that meets the current fence standards. 7. Parkways (Comp Plan 3.07.01 C, UDC 11-3A-17): Per Comp Plan policy 3.07.01C appropriate landscaping,buffers,and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors(setback,vegetation,low walls,berms,etc.) is required. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Per the UDC the minimum width of parkways planted with Class II trees shall be eight(8) feet. The width can be measured from the back of curb where there is no likely expansion of the street section within the right-of-way;the parkway width shall exclude the width of the sidewalk. Class II trees are the preferred parkway trees. The applicant is proposing a parkway along E. Escalation Drive.. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan 6.01.02B, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access to the property will be via Sublimity Avenue, a collector road. The property owners will need to relinquish their rights to the private road(Tarrega Lane). Written documentation is required prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat. 2. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17 3. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): Staff have reviewed the application for private streets within the development as shown on the preliminary plat. The street is proposed to be located in common lot in the subdivision and will connect to a local street; the point of connection of the private street to the public street is subject to approval by ACHD. The Fire Department has approved the request contingent upon both sides of the street being signed `No Parking Fire Lane."A gate is being proposed at the entry of the private street. The Director has tentatively approved the request subject to completion of the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3B within one(1)year in accord with the Findings listed in Section V below. 4. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Dead end streets No streets or series of streets that ends in a cul-de-sac or a dead end shall be longer than five hundred(500) feet except as allowed by UDC 11-6C-3. There are no dead end streets being proposed that are longer than five hundred(500) feet. ii. Block face UDC 11-6C-3-regulates block lengths for residential subdivisions. Staff has reviewed the submitted plat for conformance with these regulations. The intent of this section of code is to ensure block lengths do not exceed 750 ft,although there is the allowance of an increase in block length to 1,000 feet if a pedestrian connection is provided. In no case shall a block face exceed one thousand two hundred(1,200)feet,unless waived by the City Council. As currently designed, the proposed plat meets the block face requirements. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan 4.05.01D, UDC 11-3A-6): Per UDC 11-3A-6, requires limiting the tiling and piping of natural waterways, including, but not limited to, ditches, canals, laterals, sloughs and drains where public safety is not a concern as well as improve,protect and incorporate creek corridors (Five Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile, Ten Mile, South Slough and Jackson and Evan Drains) as an amenity in all City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis residential, commercial and industrial designs. When piping and fencing is proposed, the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-6B shall apply. In Residential Districts, irrigation easements wider than ten (10)feet shall be included in a common lot that is a minimum of twenty(20)feet wide and outside of a fenced area, unless otherwise waved by City Council. There is a private drainage ditch (Watkins Ditch) that runs along the eastern portion of the property which needs to remain and shall be placed within a thirty-eight(38)foot easement. The applicant is proposing to leave the ditch open and keep it in its natural state. The applicant needs to submit a document requesting a waiver from Council to leave the ditch open. Comprehensive Plan policy 4.05.OID requires improving and protecting creeks and other natural waterways throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas. 2. Pressurized Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year- round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single point connection to the culinary water system shall be required.If a single point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate drainage system is required in all developments by the City s adopted standards,specifications, and ordinances.Design and construction shall follow best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future construction application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.03G, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. All utilities are available to the site. Water main,fire hydrant and water service require a twenty foot(20)wide easement that extends ten (10)feet past the end of main, hydrant, or water meter.No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. A final plat will not be accepted until the Annexation ordinance and development agreement are approved by City Council. Currently,a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall,at a minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat,landscape plan,phasing plan,and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section W and the provisions contained herein. b. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures that face Sublimity Avenue shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding, porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. c. No building permits shall be issued prior to the plat being recorded. d. The Open Space amenities shall meet the following requirements: the picnic area shall include tables,benches,landscaping,and a structure for shade; and the outdoor fire ring shall meet fire safety standards,is located on a noncombustible surface and includes fixed seating. e. The property owners of parcel(s) S 1131346650 and S 1131346605 shall relinquish their rights to access and utilize the private road Tarrega Lane. Written documentation shall be submitted prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat. f. The existing homes shall connect to City water and sewer service within 60 days of it becoming available and disconnect from private service,as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. g. The single-family structure on parcel S1131346605 located at 6162 Tarrega Lane can remain in its current location once the following easements have been relinquished: o There is a thirty(30) foot wide access easement(Instrument No. 7520424&2021- 049475),that runs across the north boundary of both parcels in the project,as well as the west thirty(30) feet of each parcel. These easements are no longer required and will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat. o The existing thirty(30) foot wide access easement,(Instrument No. 9037915), which runs across the east 302.15' of the south boundary of parcel S 1131346650 will be relinquished with the recordation of the final plat due to the public road improvements in the same location. City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments& Conditions h. Written documentation to relinquish the easements listed above shall be submitted prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat. i. Lot 1,Block 1 shows a future development,this development shall align with the proposed roadway connection from the development(Skyranch Subdivision)to the west. 2. Submit the following revisions for the Preliminary Plat included in Section VII,dated 4/7/25: a. Revise the plat map to depict the dry ditch on parcel#S 1131346650 and its associated easement or provide written documentation showing the dry ditch had been abandoned and is no longer in use by the affected property owners. b. Lots shall meet the dimensional requirements of the R-2 and R-4 zoning districts per UDC 11-2A-4 and UDC 11-2A-5. 3. The Landscape Plan included in Section VII,dated 4/7/25, shall be submitted for review and approval with the following revisions prior to final plat approval: a. Show the open vision fence location. b. Tree mitigation for the future development shall be addressed on the revised landscape plan submitted with the final plat application. 4. The applicant shall comply with the open space exhibit approved as part of this plat application that depicts 8%(R-2)and 12%(R-4)or 1.06-acres(0.74 acres required)of qualified open space and exceeds the required amenity points. The picnic area shall include tables,benches,landscaping,and a structure for shade. The outdoor fire ring shall meet fire safety standards,is located on a noncombustible surface and includes fixed seating. 5. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B,as applicable. 6. The development shall comply with standards and installation for landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-3B-5 and maintenance thereof as set forth in UDC 11-3B-13. 7. The development shall comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3,including but not limited to driveways,easements,blocks,street buffers,and mailbox placement. 8. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 9. The private streets are approved subject to completion of the tasks listed in UDC 11-3F-3 within one year. Documentation of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division in order to receive final approval. 10. The private streets within the development shall be 26-feet wide and constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4B.2. 11. The Applicant shall have a maximum of two(2)years to obtain City Engineer's signature on a final plat in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 12. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of ACHD. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments& Conditions 13. Staff's failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. B. Meridian Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. To meet to-and-through requirements make sure the main is 8" up to the property boundary and have a 6"hydrant lateral coming off of the main. Fire hydrant appears to be located on property to the north. The City will require a 20ft easement up to the fire hydrant(easement centered on the lateral). The City requests that the easement extends 10'past the hydrant but only 5'is required. This easement will need to come from the owner of the property. 2. Provide 20'Easements for mains,hydrant laterals and water services. Easements should extend up to the end of main/hydrant/water meter and 10'beyond it.Water and sewer running in parallel require 30ft easement. 3. Water mains need a casing when crossing irrigation that limits access to times of the year. Either provide casing or proof that the City will have access at all times. 4. Water mains are not to be installed along driveways. Instead,locate water meters in landscaping area and run services to houses. 5. Meters should be located close to the road. 6. Services cannot cross private property other than the property being served. 7. No permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls,fences, infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)to be built within the utility easement. 8. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service outside of a public right-of-way. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet,if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. 2. Per Meridian City Code (MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility,or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review.Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to development plan approval. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments& Conditions the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 5. All existing structures that are required to be removed shall be prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development,and if so,how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9. Street signs are to be in place, sanitary sewer and water system shall be approved and activated, road base approved by the Ada County Highway District and the Final Plat for this subdivision shall be recorded,prior to applying for building permits. 10. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all uncompleted fencing,landscaping,amenities,etc.,prior to signature on the final plat. 11. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures.Where approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-313. 12. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 14. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 15. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 16. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 17. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 18. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments& Conditions 19. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 20. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can be found at hqp://www.meridiancily.org/public_works.aspx?id=272. 21. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature.This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 22. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. Meridian Fire Department 1. Turnaround shall be in accordance with 2018 International Fire Code,Appendix D, and shall meet the minimum specifications of 96'exclusive of shoulders and curbs. D. Irrigation Districts 1. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District https://weblink.meridiancity.oEg/WebLinklbrowse.aspx?id 379817&dbid O&repo Meridia nCi 2. Boise Project Board of Control https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx?id 379817&dbid 0&repo=Meridia nCi E. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) hyps://weblink.meridiancity.org/WeUink/Browse.aspx?id 379817&dbid 0&repo MeridianCi F. West Ada School District(WASD) or Other District/School https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id 379817&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCi G. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) https://weblink.meridiancity.oEgj ebLink/Browse.aspx?id 379817&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCi I City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments& Conditions V. FINDINGS A. Annexation (UDC 11-511-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone, the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds annexation of the subject site with an R-2 and R-4 zoning designation will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Low Density Residential FL UM designation if the Comprehensive Map amendment is approved and if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IV.As the designation will be in line with the large estate surrounding properties in the area. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds the proposed lot sizes and layout proposed will be consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts if the Comprehensive Plan map amendment is approved and that housing opportunities will provide consistency with the Comprehensive Plan for that area. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Council finds that the map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds the proposed annexation shall not result in adverse impact ofservices. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IV. B. Comprehensive Plan(UDC 11-511-71)) Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan,the Council shall make the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. Council finds the proposed amendment to R-2 and R-4 is consistent with the zoning in that the proposed development will integrate with the existing land use to the north and south of the property that reside in Ada County and have existing large estate lots. 2. The proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and development of the city. Council finds that the proposal to change the FL UM designation from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential will allow a transition in uses between existing Rural Urban Transition five(5) acre lots to half acre lots providing a larger estate lot than allowed within the medium density residential designation. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the goals,objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan as noted in Section III. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with this Unified Development Code. Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Unified Development Code. 5. The amendment will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. Council finds the proposed amendment will be compatible with abutting existing residential uses in the near vicinity. 6. The proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. Council finds that the proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities in this portion of the city. Sewer and water services are currently available to this site. 7. The proposed map amendment(as applicable)provides a logical juxtaposition of uses that allows sufficient area to mitigate any anticipated impact associated with the development of the area. Council finds the proposed map amendment provides a logical juxtaposition of uses and sufficient area to mitigate any development impacts to adjacent properties. 8. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. For the reasons stated in Section V and the subject findings above, Council finds that the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City. C. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section IV. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. Sewer and water are available at the site. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Council finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's Capital Improvement Program. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Council finds the proposed development is not detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Council finds the development is preserving the irrigation ditch by keeping it open as a natural feature. D. Private Streets In order to approve the application,the Director shall find the following: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article; The Director finds that the proposed private street design meets the requirements. 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage hazard,or nuisance,or other detriment to persons,property,or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds that the proposed private street would not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity if all conditions of approval are met. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan. The Director finds the use and location of the private street does not conflict with the comprehensive plan or the regional transportation plan because the proposed design meets all requirements. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or gated development. The Director finds the use and location of the private street does not conflict with the comprehensive plan or the regional transportation plan because the proposed design meets all requirements and is gated part of the development. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommend approval of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map,annexation and preliminary plat per the provisions in Section W in accord with the Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard this item on April 17. 2025.At the public hearing_the Commission moved to approve the subject annexation_Comprehensive Plan Map amendment and preliminary plat request. 1. Summary of the Commission public hearing: a. In favor: John Breckon_Breckon Land Design representing the property owner b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Carsten White resides at 6162 Tarrega Lane and will continue to reside on one of the proposed lots as well as hopefully his other brothers. The family would like to keep the property lower density so they can all have space to roam and let their kids run around and have a good time and enjoy Meridian. d. Written testimony:None C. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission. a. None 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on May 6,2025.At the public hearing. the Council moved to approve the subject annexation. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Preliminary Plat requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: John Breckon,representing the property owner: Brian White,Carsten White and Dane White b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Brian White.Carsten White. Dane White all in favor of the project d. Written testimony: None C. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. The council asked about water rights for the property owners who have rights to the dry ditch. The applicant stated in his presentation that all the users(even those still within Ada County)will be connected to irrigation services with the improvements of the proposed plat. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. Approved the waiver request to leave the Watkins Ditch open and use it as an amenity for the proposed plat. City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action � 1 1 ct Locationp I. .4 , . of Impact Analysis lu r� Legend Project Location Area of Impact r 11 LA �E HAZEL a Z a ■■��■ F:1 0 AnalysisW[RUT �1 �.r j��Ij�i�•�� ■ oil nlll�nJlllrn►�� � ■ ■� unl un■■ 1l111111= -- ��������� 1111111 ■ ■■■rfl ■ �■I .......solos LAKEloss HAZEL 11!!�• 4P old me I 11[li� p r� � 111111 O \IB!„�p� � 111111 i \ 1111� �ZCMM• 3. Future Land Use Legend - �= MU-C Project Location m Low Density Area of Impact Residential OAnalysis _�u '•, Medium Density � ® Residential ' r s ---- High —g?!F?F Density MU-RG Residential n inn— Civic f II Med-High Density -' � Residential 4. Planned Development Map Legend Project Location Area of Impact T=' City Limits Planned ParcelsBEE ; a � O Analysis mom, — --- ; 7 i 9 4 �its 1--------t ®® i J i I City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits 5. Map Notes Recent Area Preliminary Plats(within last 5-years): H-2021-0020,H-2022-0036,H-2023- 0041 Recent Area Conditional Use Permits (within last 5-years): H-2020-0009,H-2020-0057, H-2020-0117,H-2021-0021,H-2021-0036,H-2021-0087,H-2020-0056,H-2019-0097 H-2022-0036,H-2022-0050,H-2023-0041,H-2024-0014,H-2024-0041 B. Subject Site Photos y fi r City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits ' City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits "Ilk -- - _ I r City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits ,h ;I k 1 City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits ..4 I �r I � I ! k ,I .rt �. ' so I f i � I i /"1� ■ "1 1 1 1 City 1f Men'dian Department Re 11Exhibits '4k* r 1 y i Al " t l 4. DepartmentCity of Men'dian poExhibits , DepartmentCity of Men'dian poExhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S11313466SO SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY �Overall Score; 10 12nd Percentile Description Lctiatiun Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains 500-2,000 ft. from parcel YELLOW Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time 5-9 min. YELLOW Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of future pathways YELLOW Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets Arterial Road Buildout Status YELLOW plan) > existing (# of lanes) & road IS in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLOW School ❑rivability Not within 2 miles driving of existing or future school Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits D. Preliminary Plat(date: 4/7/2025) I i O O c v _-____ �____________�_____�_�_G____'__ i = r- C BLOCKI i i co G M Tq m i � � �9s ` r i 9m = X I I FI , I I I I l I 1 I r r-----r--------.----- --.-- I o N c i-o o g 00 ----- � o r------ r- r---- H m.,- p c z €c0 m 1 I I FARgo��'� czii;oc `�a�— 1 > i 6LOGK 2 i ' i M E m'" . 5� z Z 1 ' 1 I yyS O II t l p�ii'yNm Wro �"� 1 iQosRO � o �o $ �.�r m'A I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 � �p�InP�x yy�4'qq leIyy pyy �2 JJ 1 , 1 Er �P Sp'�39 AC J CC11 NA SR � I -6 .5,ya T 5yy1 Z 8 NAONOT NlIIDOYYB WAY ME Q I V[> m '° w r------i r------� r---i'I >>A Z- L.�----____'. OD u ' :Mr9 D l i 9 .si l i i i i �� ' ` D m NO i �Q i ti N j t y g D m m Ill RD1 0 co --arANw iJw L------ ------' L----r p N c 0 O z — a�IYA N zLn n —'—�---- - , -----------,;-- - r m o ppy � fA MOCK € mmz �7�� m D0coC O m A 0 0 O syE) 10 jj� Z Hg g M ii 8 c gc- N Hz i >> Z Z O O Z I 1 r , I I L 1 I I 4 g¢Rm�= ILa NAw 0"VAW --1-J 9 Q 1 I r- f I 'if 1111 m m 4�sA g i i i y # i z �< 0 z ' �+� 1 C I i.•' N 6 +I I� �--------- -� i_� 4 r 11 _ TTV 99 I p .8 8UNLA V Y AVENUE*UR8F1—Q MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION :f 6162 S. TARREGA LANE MERIDIAN, ID 83642 g . PRELIMINARY PLAT City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits E. Landscape Plan (date: 4/7/2025) I 1 I I , I I t \ 1 1 I I � I I , ..en tt —AY M W I I r---'r—, MT iCN�'f W _ I I --------—j---— ----`— T--_ -- r------ - ]�-_-_------ --�-_,I a[��seE7miAt�!!! �e SRs SSA��F� �i I�uEg y{Ia■AI ag Ey y p A I I \ 6 y ff 1 I ------- - -- `\\ i �I R �A �Him, 36 d I PHI,��1RY1F11 i1��� REE 6 RICQE LFRE(PiiVATEI'` `L__�_� -- 7 g ,{�i A°R ilit, �a r -- q g $ rill, I1 1 ------'i m Ogg � gill 1._ ,F eR i�i Is dill 11 SLMLMrY AVENUE PURJRDrn 9 i �kF °n [y 9i} m O gA�yyF 140 m ; MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION lit 3eFir 6162 S. TARREGA LANE .,.._ e o e`R�a p MERIDIAN, ID 83642 8= OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN EUIMINARY PLAT City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 4/7/2025) CITY OF MERIDIAN SINGLE FAMILY (R-2 AND R-4) OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE R-2,M CFWQ SPALE TOTAL ARMA, MaMRML EapJ�` REaUREO =.-M SP 16.220 5F(.47AL) 35087 5F!to AGJ (OVAILIFIEU OPEN*AACFJ f.5.25 AL) D% 15% R-4.12%OPEN 5PAOE TOTALAEC& scamr.01 ` f.95 IGJ' WWREP 11%742 5F MOM 5F(M AGY (am'to1Eo C'm 9PACO 023ft 1w talc LANDSCAPE LEGEND a � a 0 AREA- .RCA- - - 1]484 5•�.f-. 3 r 6 y7.IT. - — AREA.-24,747 SO FT r————— — — —E ESCALATION DRIVE s S 1"=15'"r a, MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PROJCT#24054 g S. TARREGA LANE, MERIDIAN _ OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT EX1.2 • �.nw City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits G. Open Space Amenities Exhibit(date: 4/7/2025) (A)PERGOLA AMENITY o FIRE PIT AMENITY C TABLE AMENITY Z CALLOUT LEGEN------------ m w o w O 3cc— R <01 Q W cA rr W �NWQbj AMENTY AREA EN EMENT /n16ENCH AMENITY '` EX1.1 a FM A PERGOLA AMENITY AFIRE PIT AMENITY STABLE AMENITY r � p 6ENCH AMENITY City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits H. Building Elevations(date: 12/13/2024) 1 - j. City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits 1 . � ray �f s r r S DepartmentCity of Men'dian po I. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map .,ACCURATE SNRVEIINB 6 NAPPING sE p y I cE Job No.23-257 Exterior Boundary Description A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian,Meridian,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the found 2 inch aluminum cap on a 5/8 inch iron pin stamped PLS 11463 at the Center-South Sixteenth Corner of Section 31,T.3 N.,R.1 E.,from which the found 5/8 inch iron pin with plastic cap labeled PLS 12459 at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 31&6 bears S 00"15'54"W a distance of 1341.76 feet; Thence along the east boundary line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31 S 00" 15'54"W for a distance of 391,80 feet to a found 5/8`h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence S 00'15'54"W a distance of 391.80 feet to a found 5/8"inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 133.61 feet along a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 523.50 feet,a central angle of 14'37' 23"and a long chord bearing N 82'25'25"W a distance of 133.25 feet to a found 5/8"'inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 75'06'43"W for a distance of 94.39 feet to a found 5/8"inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 122.44 feet along a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 476.50 feet,a central angle of 14'43' 21"and a long chord bearing N 82'28'24"W a distance of 122.10 feet to a found 5/8"inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence continuing N 89`50'04"W for a distance of 308.87 feet to a found 5/8th inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 89'49'59"W for a distance of 653.49 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 11463; Thence N 00°06'14"W for a distance of 334.40 feet to a found stone monument with a chiseled"X"; Thence S 89"51'33"E for a distance of 1309.14 feet to a found 5/8"'inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463,said corner being the Center-South 1/16th Corner the POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 10.278 acres,more or less. 4 11463 A d' 12.17•L`� 1520 W Washington St„ Boise, ID 83702 • Phone 208488-4227 • q a� www.accuratesurveyors.com BAN J.�P City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits EXHIBIT MAP A PORTION OF LAND LYING WfTHIN THE SE I/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC7ION 31. T 3N., R.1E., 8.M. ADA COUNTY—STATE OF IDAHO CHISELED "X" IN STONE S 89 51',33" E 1309.14' P.O.B. C-S SCALE: 1"=200' �y 1116TH O �O •r 10.2781AC. n o Ln z �m allbmy N89 49 59 W 653.49 3OS.87 LEGEND s m BOUNDARY LINE N 751J8'43" C2 o a —--—- SEC710N LINE 94.39' to :n o PARCEL LINE q m a oa FOUND 2"ALUMINUM CAP 01 En a IN ASPHALT • FOUND 5/8"IRON PIN, 36 31 ___N 89 4_224" W__2490.4_0_'NTH PLASTIC CAP, AS NOTED _T.3N" R.IE_6_M. 31 1/4 CORNER FOUND 5/8"IRON PIN WTH 17 Ei SEC7ION CORNER E. LAKE HAZEL RD. T.2N. R.1.E B.M. 6 2"ALUM/NUM CAP, PLS 11461 R.1W.IR.1E. FOUND 1/2"IRON PIN, W7H PLASTIC CAP, PLS 4725 O SET 5/8"IRON PIN NTH 2"ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 P.O.8. POINT OF BEGINNING S / CURVE TABLE ACW VATE , SURVEYING & MAPPING 11463 9- 1520 W.Washington SL CURVE ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH s.?ij. Boise,Idaho 83702 C1 122.44' 476.50 14'43'21 N . 8228'2254" WW 112 2.10 � 0PG (208)488-4227 C2 133.61' 33.25' + .acturatesurveyors.com BAN J.DAB DATE DEC 2024 JOB24-244 City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits J. R-2 Rezone Exhibit(date: 3/18/2025) .,ACCURATE _� _ y SURVEYING >t MAPPING S E R V It" Job No 24-244 Description for Re-Zoning A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the found 2 inch aluminum cap on a 5/8 inch iron pin stamped PLS 11463 at the Center-South Sixteenth Corner of Section 31,T.3 N.,R.1 E.,from which the found 5/8 inch iron pin with plastic cap labeled PLS 12459 at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 31&6 bears S 00"15'54"W a distance of 1341.76 feet; Thence S 89°51'33"E for a distance of 62.50 feet to a point on the centerline of S.Sublimity Ave.as shown in the proposed plat of Apex Northwest Subdivision 44,Page 2,Block 14; Thence S 00'15'54"W along the centerline of said S.Sublimity Ave.for a distance of 391.80 feet; Thence N 89'51'33"W for a distance of 62.50 feet to a found 5/8 inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 133.61 feet along a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 523.50 feet,a central angle of 14"37' 23"and a long chord bearing N 82'25'25"W a distance of 133.25 feet to a found 5/8t°inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463: Thence N 75"06'43"W for a distance of 94.39 feet to a found 5/8`h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence 122.44 feet along a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 476.50 feet,a central angle of 14'43' 21"and a long chord bearing N 82'28'24"W a distance of 122.10 feet to a found 5/81"inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence continuing N 89"50'04"W for a distance of 308.87 feet to a found 5/8"'inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 4725; Thence N 89°49'59"W for a distance of 346.90 feet to a set 5/8"inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 00'10'01"E for a distance of 334.54 feet to a set 5/81"inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence S 89`51'33"E for a distance of 1000.97 feet to a found 5/8"inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463,said corner being the Center-South 1/16th Corner the POINT OF BEGINNING: Said parcel contains 8.480 acres,more or less. G O 11463 I.2p•tSo ��rFOF1�p�M, I 4 AN J.OPT 1520 W Washington St., Boise. ID 83702 • Phone:208-488-4227 www accuratesurveyors corn City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits EXHIBIT MAP A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 114 OF SEC770N 31, T.3N., R.IE., B.M. ADA COUNTY—STATE OF IDAHO C-S SCALE: 1"=200' S 895133'E 1063.47' 1116N P.O.B. LEGEND T v 1000.s w BOUNDARY LINEz e qW —'-—--—SEC77ON LINE 0 7.918fAC, PARCEL LINE 1• `tj W v r\ O 0 FOUND 2- O ALUMINUM CAP e0l h O ' • FOUND 518'IRON PIN, 2 y p~ h O O y y IN ASP WITH PLAS7IC CAP, AS N07E0 ,346,9 ' FOUND 518"IRON PIN W71H N 89 49'S9' W 308.87 u t 2'ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 p • FOUND 112'IRON PIN, WIN C2 PLASAC CAP, PLS 4725 N 7506'43" W- ', R O SET 5/8"IRON PIN W77H 94.39' `O i 2'ALUMINUM CAP,PLS 11463 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING V A CALCULATED POINT \ 36 1 A N 69'4_224' W2490.4O_'_T.3N. R.1 \ 1 114 CDRNIR 1 16 SECTION CORNER E. LAKE HAZEL Rd T.2 N. R.1.E B.M. 6 LINE TABLE R 1 W IR.1 E. LINE I BEARING DISTANCE L Ll N 89'51 33 E 62.50 ACCURATE L2 N 89'51'33'W 62.50 G ACCURATE I L` � SURVEYING 9 MAPPItiG 11463 CURVE TABLE 2 1520 W.Washingft.u �j•Sf•Zsp Boise,Idaho 83702 CURVE ARC LENGTH RADIUS DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH (208)488-4227 S)�OF 10* —accuratesumeyors.a Cl 122.44 476.50 14'43'21" N 82'28 24 W 122.10' yr4 C2 1 133.61' 1 523.50' 1 14'37'23 N N J.OPNG DAIS DEC 2024 A0824-244 City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits K. R-4 Rezone Exhibit(date: 3/18/2025) 1l rF� ACCURATE F�� � yo SURVEYING & MAPPING 'Pt R U l 0 Job No.23-257 Description for Ile-Zone. A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Townshlp 3 North,Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian,Meridian,Idaho,being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the found 2 inch aluminum cap on a 5/8 inch iron pin stamped PLS 11463 at the Center-South Sixteenth Corner of Section 31,T.3 N.,R.1 E.,from which the found 5/8 inch iron pin with plastic cap labeled PLS 12459 at the Quarter Corner common to Sections 31&6 bears 5 00'15'54"W a distance of 1341.76 feet; thence N 89"51'33"W a distance of 1000.97 feet to a set 5/8"'inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence S 00'10'01"W for a distance of 334.54 feet to a set S/Sth inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463; Thence N 89`49'59"W for a distance of 306.59 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron pin with a plastic cap labeled PLS 11463; Thence N 00°06'14"W for a distance of 334.40 feet to a found stone monument with a chiseled"x"; Thence S 89`51'33"E for a distance of 308.17 feet to a set 5/8`h inch iron pin with a 2 inch aluminum cap stamped PLS 11463,the POINT OF BEGINNING; Said parcel contains 2.360 acres or 102,809 square feet,more or less. � a R U9 11463 y 4rF OF tdP�G 1 1520 W.Washington St.,Boise. ID 83702 •Phone:208-488-4227 www.accu ratesurveyors.corn City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits EXHIBIT MAP A POR7I01V OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T.3N., R.FE., B.M. ADA COUNTY—STATE OF IDAHO CHISELED "X' IN SroNE S 8951'33"E 1309.14' 308.17' P.O.B. 97' C-s "SCALE: 1 =200' $ S 895 1000. 1'33" E 3 'MOTH 0 ,r 2.360tAC. 6 306.59' v N 89 4959" W h e W Q LO v na Q 00 ,n 4 O 2 4 SECTION CORNER 36kl 114 CORNER N 89'4_2'24=W_ 2490.40_'—L. N. R.,E_B.M. 31 LEGEND 1 ' 6 E. LAKE HAZEL RD. T.zN. R.1.E B.M. s BOUNDARY LINE R 1 11. IR.1 E. ------- SEC71ON LINE PARCEL LINE 0 FOUND 2'ALUMINUM CAP IN ASPHALT • FOUND 5/8"IRON PIN, WIN PLAS7IC CAP, AS N07ED FOUND ALUMINUM IRON PIN W74 G ACC '�/ATE 2'ALUMINUM CAP, PLS JJ463 `�J'V� 0 FOUND 1/2"IRON PIN, WIN O PLASTIC CAP, PLS 4725 d 2 SUAVE W,W i p n R. I N L O SET 5/8"IRON PIN WIH 1146 3 ,520 w.Idaho g 70 R. j.tT•2� Boiu,Idaho 83702 2"ALUMINUM CAP, PLS 11463 (208)488-4227 ' 0.B. POINT OF BEGINNING Nq�OF \OPG —ccuraWumeyom— N J.OP� DA7E DE<2024 J0824-244 City of Meridian I Department Report VIL Exhibits L. CPAM Exhibit(date: 3/18/2025) 500 1.000 Feet Adopted Future land Uses Legendz .............. a : W futuro Land Uses � •-- - ------- .. CltywIde - low Dcnslly Rmwential Medium Density Residcnlial — 1,Acd-Hayti Denyly R(zsidcailial t s - Hiph Density Reside-irial i - Commercial LAKE HAZEI Office - tndustr o Civic Proposed Future Land Uses _ Ord town _ Mixed the Negt*"hood Mixed Use Community - Mixed Use Regional _ Mixed Use Non-Residential 1 Mixed Use-Intercharv,) ft- ni Ten We Specific - low Domity Employmow _ Lifestyle Center MzIV Z_ �High Density Employment ..... ....... . ... .. e ® Mixed Employment W .- ® Mixed Use-Residential --_ •-•---- - ® Mix—: u n.11 1 v LAKE HAZEI - City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES &DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases,and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days. Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area, transitional development,government,and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2<5.0;R-4<2.0;R-8< 1.0;R-15 <0.5;R-40<0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project,approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous,and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases,and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area.Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate,and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan (e.g.pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency,etc.).Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way,and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project,approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database,exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources,including sewer main lines,sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit,roadway improvements, school and park proximity,and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order),and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low,are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F.Letter A represents free flow City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes& Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables,and Charts conditions,and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D,stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians,nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes& Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables,and Charts E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Skyranch H-2024-0022) between the City of Meridian and Hubbardl LLC and C4 Land LLC and Jesse Wakley and Jennifer Wakley and Eaglel LLC for Property Located Near the Northeast Corner of S. Meridian Rd. and E. Lake Hazel Rd. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025=039440 Boise,Idaho Pgs=73 vbailey 06/25/2025 08:37:40 AM_ CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Hubbardl"LLC,Owner/Developer 3.C4 Land LLC,Owner/Developer 4.Jesse Wakley and Jennifer Wakley, Owner/Developer 5.Eaglel`LLC,Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(this"Agreement") is made and entered into this24th day of June ,2025, by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called"CITY,"whose address is 33 E.Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho 83642,and Hubbardl LLC,whose address is 1979 N. Locust Grove Rd., Meridian, Idaho'83646; and C4 Land LLC,whose address is 4824 Fairview Ave., Boise,Idaho 83704;and Jesse Walcley and Jennifer Wakley,whose address is , c' 4 aka and Eaglel LLC,whose address is P.O. Box 1968,Eagle, Idaho'83616, hereinafter collectively called "OWNER/DEVELOPER." 1. RECITALS: 1.1 _ WHEREAS, Owner/Developer is the sole owner, in law and/or equity,of a certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho described in Exhibit"A,"which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, hereinafter referred to as the"Property;" and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code §67-6511 A provides that cities may, by ordinance, establish provisions governing the creation,form, recording,modification, enforcement and termination of development agreements required or permitted as a condition of zoning that the Owner/Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-513-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements and the modification of development agreements; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer has submitted an application for annexation of 20.039 acres of land with a request for R-15 zoning and a development agreement modification to remove the affected portion of property included in Exhibit"A" DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-SKYRANICHH-2024-0022 Page I of 11 {{ L from an existing Development Agreement recorded in Ada County as Instrument #2016-007088 and for the inclusion of the Property into this new Agreement, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the duly noticed public hearings before the Meridian City Council as to how the property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS,the record of the proceedings for requested development agreement modification held before the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction, and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS,on the 7'h day of January,2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"),which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit°B;" and 1.8 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deems it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request;and 1.9 WHEREAS,the affected portion of the property listed in Exhibit"A" shall no longer be subject to the terms of the existing Development Agreement(Instrument #2016-007088)and shall be bound by the terms contained herein in this new agreement; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement modification for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and fiom affected property owners and to ensure zoning designations are in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC,Title 11. NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT W SKYRANCH H-2024-0022 Page 2 of 11 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS:That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement,the following words, terms and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for, unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Hubbardl LLC,whose address is 1979 N. Locust Grove Rd., Meridian, Idaho 83646; and C4 Land LLC, whose address is 4824 Fairview Ave.,Boise,Idaho 83704; and Jesse Wakley and Jennifer Wakley,whose address is G ASS S , Thee I(— l-V\ ; and Eaglel LLC,whose address is P.O.Box 1968, Eagle, Idaho 83616,hereinafter collectively the parties that own and are developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as described in Exhibit "A" describing a portion of property(20.039 acres)to be annexed and a portion of property (24.53 acres) to be removed from an existing Development Agreement recorded in Ada County as Instrument#2016-007088,with such parcel being bound by this new Agreement, which Exhibit"A" is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed as permitted,conditional and/or accessory uses under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1 Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. The current use of the property is agricultural with one (1)residential property existing.The existing structure will remain but will be required to hook up to the city's water and sewer system at the time of final plat for that phase. The existing well and septic system will be abandoned at that time as required. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—SKYRANCH H-2024-0022 Page 3 of 11 b. Future development of this site shall be consistent with the preliminary plat, phasing plan, landscape plan,qualified open space,and qualified site amenities (i.e., a 5,000+s.f: children's playground with a play structure,swings,climbing rocks, a climbing dome, seating benches,within a safe fenced area,two pickleball courts, a pool with changing facilities and restrooms, and a fenced dog park),and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII as proposed in the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit"B" and the provisions contained herein. c. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face S.Meridian Road (i.e., Lots 24-40, Block 6) and the new collector road (Sublimity Way)(i.e., Lots 2-6, Block 1; and Lots 2-5 and Lot 7,Block 2)and E. Lake Hazel Road(i.e., Lots 8- 19 and 23-32,Block 1) shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation e. projections,recesses step-backs, pop- outs), ( g��P j � p P p outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement.Requires Planning approval prior to issuance of building permits. d. The Owner/Developer shall adhere to the approved phasing plan that was presented at the December 10,2024 public hearing and shown in Exhibit VII.F. e. Future development of the site shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of development. f. The Owner/Developer shall provide the following regarding the closure of Tarrega Lane: i. Provide written documentation allowing the closure of Tarrega Lane. ii. Prior to plan approval and Ada County Highway District's (ACHD) signature on the final plat which would close the private road, relocate the proposed location of stub street,Street Q,to align with the existing location of Tarrega Lane at the site's north property line or provide written documentation that Street Q can be stubbed to the north, in its proposed location, and that all six(6)parcels who use Tarrega Lane will have access to Street Q. iii. If the Owner/Developer is unable to remove the private road, then Tarrega Lane should remain within the site to allow access to the ` existing six(6)residential parcels located north of the site. i i I DEVELOPMENT AGIZEEMENT--SKYRANCH H-2024.0022 Page 4 of I I g. Provide a stub road from Skyranch Subdivision to the property to the south (parcels S l 131336156 and S 1131336111).Locate the stub street to allow for the future construction of a bridge crossing and maintain an easement for the roadway. The Owner/Developer is required to pay a road trust deposit for half the bridge construction to ACHD;the actual amount of the road trust deposit will be determined during their plan review process. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six(6) months after the date of the Findings,the City may, at its sole discretion,declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner's Developer's heirs, successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property,this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period.In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty(30)days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which actions must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty(180)days;provided,however,that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180) day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall,upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code § 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty,to de-annex all or a portion of the Property,reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property,including water service and/or sewer service.Further,City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements,conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to the City's decision to annex and/or re-.zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive,remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--SKYRANCH H-2024•0022 Pages of I 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue.This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance,and enforcement.Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County,Idaho, 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay, 7.6 Waiver.A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall,immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy,notify the City Engineer and request the City F.,ngineer's inspections and written ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion therefor in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinance of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer. 10. ZONING: City shall,following recordation of the duly approved Agreement,enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agrees to provide, if required by the City. 12, CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:No Certificates of 0ccupancy shall be issued if the improvements have not been installed, completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES:That Owner/Developer agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement, 14, NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3)days after deposit in the United States s' Mail, registered or certified mail,postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—SKYRANCH H-2024-OC72 Page 6 of 11 CITY: with copy to, City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian,Idaho 83642 Meridian,Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Hubbardl LLC C4 Land LLC Eaglel LLC 1979 N. Locust Grove Rd. 4824 Fairview Ave. P.O. Box 1968 Meridian, Idaho 83646 Boise, Idaho 83704 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Jesse Walcley and Jennifer Wakley S S • 1A L,ki 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted,to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property.Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, has determined that Owner/Developer has fully performed its obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonable in giving any consent, approval, or taking any other action under this Agreement. DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT—SKYRANCH 1-1-2024-0022 Page 7 of 11 20. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement,the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 21. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion,to remove a portion of the Property("Removed Property")from this Agreement at any time,provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining pollion of the Property, which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements,condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof,and there are no promises,agreements,conditions or understanding,either oral or written, express or implied,between Owner/Developer and City,other than as are stated herein. j Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration,amendment, change or addition to this I( Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant,with respect to City,to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing the Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [End of text.Acknowledgements, signatures, and Exhibits A and B follow.] i DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT--SKYRANCH H.2024-0022 Page 8 of 11 j ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Hubbard LLC By: G'A"5 Its: State of ) ss: County of ) On this a of G 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared_ , known or identified to me to be the�rn.(/yy► l'tI of lIubbardl LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and of ed my official seal the ly and year in this certificate first above written. �.��mt•q,,* •..•` lE L,g ",# (SEA) 140TARY•,.� Notary'llublic " My Commission Expires: �-�• �(A O UBL1C��, o= OWNER/DEV.ELOWj' P pg�1OP.••'�� C4 Land LLC �•''""""��•` y: Its: State of ss: County of AA ) On Uus kl� ay of 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared ,known or identified to me to be the of C4 Land LLC and the person xlho signed abov and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and of`xed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL li�`P *see*, •.r Notary Public • ,,C;'•�OTARy';�',�''; My Commission Expires: ~3~010o'1(O a :o AUB LIC DEVELOPMENT AGREENI N� N� �0$22 ,•'�i ''''ii•••••�`S'"0" Page 9 of I I OWNER/DEVELOPER: Eaglel LLC By: C- Cc-4 w-5 Its: M c•— � r^ State of.� ) ss: County of ) On this xOday of MaA4 ,2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared aI�GQ (l rah ,known or identified to me to be the W2e'24,i —A of Eiglel LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand an •ffixed my officials al the day and year in this certificate first above written. •,,t's Ole n u,,�,# .••�••Q• �E•LA���'•. (SEAL) G;• '•.•�'•, Notary Public �.lyoTAR y �= My Commission Expires: D 3'GZ�o z Z o pUB LICIw•1 I 0 O WNER/DE VELOPP3$��gT'••••••'�Q►�•.• OF '/t, - 'or Jesse Wakley jJeifer Waldgy 1. State of �� ) ss: County of ) On this C9 *11 of 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Jessc Walcley and Jen y,knnifer alleown or identified to me to be the persons who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hpve hereunto set my hand and aff ed my official seal the ay and year in this certificate first above written. (SE I`I,'�i� NOtaly PU llC �' ��TA!'•.�t`�.' My Commission Expires:__T"3 •, •• No.202;.• O • DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—SKYRANCH H-2024-0022 ,# a' Page 10 of 11 :,'��of ,►��'' • �..,,,��, y�4iirinf�N� 1 I CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-24-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 State of Idaho } ss County of Ada } On this 24th day of June ,2025,before me,a Notary Public,personalty appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian,who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I'have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. c s (SEAL.) Notary Public for Idaho 3-28-2028 E My Commission Expires: 3 1 i i , DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-SKYRANCH H-2024-0022 Page 11 of 11 EXHIBIT A JAW Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC �W-00T P: (208) 398-8104 F: (208) 398-8 1 05 2030 5. Washington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 Full Boundary Legal Description BASIS OF BEARINGS for this legal description is North 89143'40"West, between the southwest corner and the S1/4 corner of Section 31, T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Government Lot 4 and the SE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 31, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 5/8"rebar with no cap marking the S1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence North 0014'33"West, coincident with the east line of said SE1/4 of the SW1/4, a distance of 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89043'40"West, parallel with the south line of the SW1/4, a distance of 1568.70 feet to a 5/8" rebar cap/PLS 11574; Thence North 00008'07"West, parallel with the east line of said Government Lot 4, a distance of 207.59 feet to the centerline of the Rawson Canal, marked by a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 11574 witness corner, bearing South 00108'07" East, 41.63 feet; Thence coincident with said centerline the following three (3) courses and distances: Thence North 52036'37"West, 295.49 feet, marked by a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 11574 reference monument, which bears North 32021'59" East, 33.11 feet; Thence North 62130'36"West, 403.28 feet, marked by a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 11574 reference monument, which bears North 27008'31" East, 33.00 feet; North 63003'23"West, 292.73 feet to the easterly right of way of S. Meridian Road, marked by a copper plug PLS 11574; Thence North 05048'54"West, coincident with said easterly right of way, 92.41 feet to an Idaho Transportation Department brass cap; Thence North 00006'16"West, coincident with said easterly right of way, 135.61 feet to a 5/8"rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence North 00007'37"West, coincident with said easterly right of way, 380.98 feet to an aluminum cap on the north line of said Government Lot 4; Thence South 89053'03"East, coincident with said north line, 1129.32 feet to the northeast corner of said Government Lot 4, marked by a found chiseled X in a stone; Thence South 00008'07" East, coincident with the east line of said Government Lot 4, a distance of 669.17 feet to a 1/2"rebar cap/PLS 11463, marking the northwest corner of the S1/2 of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4; Thence South 89048'22"East, coincident with the north line of the S1/2 of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, a distance of 1304.93 feet to the east line of said SE1/4 of the SW1/4; P : \2020\ 1 EMT\ 120050 - WILLEMAN SUB GG \ Survey \ Drawings \ Descriptions \ 120050 - Fu11 Bndy Legal . docx Page 11 Thence South 0114'33"West, coincident with said east line, 670.94 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 43.823 acres, more or less. 1 57 �TE '01 ✓FFF �-AG P : \ 2020\ 1 EMT \ 120050 -WILLEMAN SUB CG \ Survey \ Drawings \ Descriptions \ 120050 - Full Bndy Leg al . docx Page 12 3 g � 4 115 4 73 o ✓F�F LEAG��y vi U.°-'i NTS Q J o 36 31 W>M CDR N 1 PLS7323 SHAFER VIEW ESTATES SW1/16CORNER GOVT LOT 4& FOUND CHISELED"r S 89°53'03"E 1129.32' IN ASTONE SE114 S W114 O --- -- -- --� SEC. 31 T.3 N., R 1 E., B.M. 3I I mi 81 ZI I N Im 135.61' N 0OV6'16"W I n 92.41' I C v 8 HD N 05°4834"W I C N _ ° 8 i N\ S 89°9822"E 1304.93' a °0323a\ 2 43.823 ACRES± o �`RNI LI m Q I = 0 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING I OLSTANCE LI N 3P2159"E 33.11' ,g L2 N27-M31-El 33.00' 4\ WC qo I Z U 36 31 _ 1189.91' g�,�___-__-__ N f9 43'40_W 1568.70' _ �r'>F..31 m Q --- _-- _ 1 6 ____ N 69°43W0"W 2490.43' W1/16 CORNER_ ___. 51/4 CORNER 6 W BASIS OF REARING ILLEGIBLE NO GIP C n A" L Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC { room P: (208) 398-81 04 F: (208) 398-81 05 2030 5. Washington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 Annexation Boundary Description BASIS OF BEARINGS for this legal description is North 89143'40"West, between a 5/8" rebar with no cap marking the S1/4 corner of Section 31 and an aluminum cap, PLS 7323 marking the southwest corner of Section 31,T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being the S1/2 of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" rebar with no cap marking the S1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence North 89043'40"West, coincident with the south line of said SE1/4 of the SW1/4, a distance of 1300.52 feet to a 5/8" rebar with an illegible cap marking the W1/16 corner of said Section 31; Thence leaving said south line, North 0008'07"West, coincident with the west line of said SE1/4 of the SW1/4, a distance of 669.16 feet to a 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 5359 marking the NW corner of said S1/2 of the SE1/4 of the SW 1/4; Thence South 89048'22"East, coincident with the north line of said S1/2 of the SE1/4 of the SW1/4, a distance of 1304.93 feet to the east line of said SE1/4 of the SW1/4; Thence South 0014'33"West, coincident with said east line, 670.94 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 20.039 acres, more or less. L C o 11574 ' c/io�z4 TE of IV ✓FFF BEAG�-�`y P : \ 2020 \ 1 EMT\ 120050 -WILLEMAN SUB CG \ Survey \ Drawings \ Descriptions1120050 - Annex L e g a I d o c x Page 11 y II^^ N 00°0639'W 2669.86' S MERIDIAN RD z �y� � a rn \ � b 3 b, N 00"06'07"W 669.16' nqn� 1 m61 1 fifififiAl I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 i I I I I � I ��I I 0$I I gal a PRO o t w I �o I Ai O µ I o�� rn ION I I - i I I I 800 I t I I I I I I I I I I DI I OBI o; arI I I O a Z l I 2 Z S 00°14'33"W 670.94' PROJECT. OWNERIDEVELOPER: 2030 S. WASHINGTON AVE. DWG# ANNEXATION BOUNDARY EXHIBIT EMMETT, ID 83617 120050-ROS ADA COUNTY, IDAHO CONGER GROUP P. (208) 398-8104 PROJECT# ��wrOOT� F: (208)398-8105 120050 - SHEET WE' 212024 LandSurYeyir� LLG WWW.sAWTOOTHLs.COM 1 OF1 Sawtooth Land Surveying, LLC �ftwT��r� P: (208) 398-8104 F: (208) 398-8105 2030 5. Washington Ave., Emmett, ID 83G 17 Rezone Legal Description BASIS OF BEARINGS for this legal description is North 89043'40"West, between the southwest corner and the S1/4 corner of Section 31,T. 3 N., R. 1 E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. A parcel of land being a portion of Government Lot 4 of Section 31, Township 3 North, Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a 5/8"rebar with no cap marking the S1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence North 89043'40"West, coincident with the south line of the SW1/4 of said Section 31, a distance of 1300.52 feet to the W1/16 corner of said Section 31 and the southeast corner of said Government Lot 4, marked by a 5/8" rebar/cap illegible; Thence North 00008'07"West, coincident with the east line of said Government Lot 4, a distance of 25.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 2471 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89043'40"West, parallel with said south line, 268.01 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence North 00008'07"West, parallel with said east line, 207.59 feet to the centerline of the Rawson Canal, marked by a 5/8"rebar/cap PLS 11574 witness corner, bearing South 00008'07" East, 41.63 feet; Thence coincident with said centerline the following three (3) courses and distances: Thence North 52036'37"West, 295.49 feet, marked by a 5/8"rebar/cap PLS 11574 reference monument, which bears North 32021'59"East, 33.11 feet; Thence North 62030'36"West, 403.28 feet, marked by a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 11574 reference monument, which bears North 27008'31" East, 33.00 feet; North 63003'23"West, 292.73 feet to the easterly right of way of S. Meridian Road, marked by a copper plug PLS 11574; Thence North 05048'54"West, coincident with said easterly right of way, 92.41 feet to an Idaho Transportation Department brass cap; Thence North 00006'16"West, coincident with said easterly right of way, 135.61 feet to a 5/8" rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence North 00007'37"West, coincident with said easterly right of way, 380.98 feet to an aluminum cap on the north line of said Government Lot 4; Thence South 89053'03" East, coincident with said north line, 1129.32 feet to the northeast corner of said Government Lot 4, marked by a found chiseled X in a stone; P : \ 2020 \ 1 EMT \ 120050 -WILLEMAN SUB CG \ Survey \ Drawings \ Descriptions \ 120050 - Rezone Legal . docx Page 11 Thence South 00108'07"East, coincident with the east line of said Government Lot 4, a distance of 1313.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, The above described parcel contains 24.530 acres, more or less. iC �60 d 1157 ��t OF ✓FF� BEAG�-�y P : \ 2020 \ 1 EMT\ 120050 - WILLEMAN SUB CG \ Survey \ Drawings\ Descriptions \ 120050 - Rezone Leg alAocx Page 12 36 31 W 1/4 COR SHAFER VIER'ESTATES BLS 7323 SW1/16 CORNER FOUND CHISELED'r NTS S89°5303"E 1129.32' --___--------_--IN A STONE GOVT LOT 4 SEC 31 T.3 N., R 1 E., B.M. �I 24.530 ACRES± ��I I Z' Q � � I T T o O � � 2 '•� � ht 66.00'9LNt6W0FRECL4W770N w \••� ``��2� RlG4T0FWAY6AS8 VT RM I Q Ig RM i LINE TABLE LINEI BEARING DISTANCE az, Ll N 32°2]59"E 33.11' Q- 11574 L2 NZ7"DB31"E 33.00' i l�di 36 31 1189.91 - -- -o-----------� 25.00' , N 89°9390"W 268.01' f N 00°O8'07"W 1300.52' 31 -- ----------- W LAKE HAZEL RD -- --- --- --�wim CORNER ___ — 1 B N 89°4340"W I490.43' Sl/4 CORNER BASIS OF BEARING IutMIXE Nip MP B PROJECT: OWNERIDEVELOPER: 2030 S. WASHINGTON AVE. DWG# REZONE BOUNDARY EXHIBIT EMMETT, ID 83617 120050-ROS ADA COUNTY,IDAHO CONGER GROUP P: (208)398-8104 PROJECT# 5, r0OT F. (208)398-8105 120050 SHEET DATE: 612024 Land.Surveyi LLG WWW.S4WTOOTHLS.COM 1 OF I EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAWM� El�ty AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for annexation of 20.039-acres of land with R-15 zoning; rezoning of 24.53 acres of land from R-4 to R-15; modification of the existing development agreement to create a new one to develop the proposed single-family residential development and Preliminary Plat consisting of 285 building lots(284 new and 1 existing),28 common lots and 8 common drives on 43.82 acres of land zoned R-15 by Laren Bailey,Conger Group. Case No(s). H-2024-0022 For the City Council Hearing Date of: November 19, 2024(Findings on January 7,2024) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of November 19, 2024, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of November 19, 2024,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of November 19, 2024, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of November 19, 2024,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance,established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION,AZ,MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0022) - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of November 19, 2024, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of November 19, 2024,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years, may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A, the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time, the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting, the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION,AZ,MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0022) -2- use not to exceed one (1)two(2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-617). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10,seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of November 19,2024. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION,AZ,MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0022) -3 - By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the January day of 2025 COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED_A)�E COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE . COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE . COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert Si ison 1-7-2025 Attest: p //// �/ � C.Ni i illIAN'. � ' SEAT, Chris Jo on 1-7-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 1-7-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION,AZ,MDA,PP,RZ-H-2024-0022) -4- EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CjfEP,1D1AN*,,-, DEPARTMENT REPORT '"o HEARING 11/19/2024 Legend [� DATE: 14 \ � `�' Project Location RUT TO: Mayor& City Council Area of Impact I 0 Analysis R1 FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 , R 2 Iritter@meridiancity.org t`'`ti R`8 cr APPLICANT: Laren Baily, Conger Group R-15 C-C SUBJECT: H-2024-0022 R-G Skyranch AZ, RZ, PP and MDA R-4 LOCATION: Located in the S'h of the SW '/4 of Section 31, Township 3N,Range IE, RUT ' parcels: S 1131336050, S 113 133603 1, C_Z—AA S1131346925, S1131346935, S1131346941, S1131347001, S1131347101 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 20.039-acres of land with R-15 zoning;rezoning of 24.53 acres of land from R-4 to R-15; modification of the existing development agreement to create a new one to develop the proposed single-family residential development and Preliminary Plat consisting of 285 building lots (284 new and 1 existing), 28 common lots and 8 common drives on 43.82 acres of land zoned R-15. B. Issues/Waivers Applicant is proposing a single use development which is not consistent with the Mixed-Use Regional FLUM designation. The proposed development lacks key design elements required by the Comprehensive Plan such as: • Function integration • Outward-facing design • Physical integration and shared features • Support for local services • Design integration,purposeful open space • Pedestrian connectivity and • Limited reliance on arterial roads The applicant is suggesting they utilize the property to the south as the commercial component of the mixed-use development,while their own proposed development would provide some of the residential units.However,the issue is that there are currently no conceptual plans illustrating City of Meridian ' Department Report I. Project Overview how these two properties would be integrated to create a cohesive mixed-use development. This lack of detailed planning makes it unclear how the two sites would work together to meet the requirements and function as a single,unified project. The applicant has the option of applying f'or a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment in order to develop the property as proposed. C. Recommendation Staff: Denial Planning Commission: Denial D. Decision Approved by City Council City of Meridian ' Department Report I. Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential Existing Zoning R-4,RUT VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning R-15 Adopted FLUM Designation MU-RG,Med-High Density Residential VII.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 5/28/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 5/28/2024 Site posting date 10/4/2024 Table 3:Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.G • Comments Received Comments were not received prior to issuance of this staff - report • Commission Action Required No - • Access E. Lake Hazel Road - • Traffic Level of Service Better than"E" - ITD Comments Received Yes,Letter IV.I Meridian Public Works Wastewater 1 • Distance to Mainline Sewer available from the east along the future collector street • Impacts or Concerns No- Must provide stub to SI 131346650 Meridian Public Works Water 1 • Distance to Mainline Water available at the site • Impacts or Concerns Yes o Only the first phase of the development can be constructed with a single connection to east. Before any additional phase are developed a second water connection is required. o Ensure no permanent structures(trees,bushes, buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences, infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)are built within the utility easement. o Engineer to verify if there is a well onsite.If a well is located on the site it must be abandoned per regulatory requirements and proof of abandonment must be provided to the City. o Each phase of the development will need to be modeled to verify minimum fire flow pressure is maintained -Locate meters and fire hydrants so they are at least 5' from trees or other permanent structure. School District(s) West Ada School District IVT • Capacity of Schools Mary McPherson Elementary—550 - Victory Middle School— 1,000 Mountain View High School—2,175 • Number of Students Enrolled Mary McPherson Elementary—494 .0W Victory Middle School— 1,079 md= City of Meridian ' Department Report II. Community Metrics Mountain View High School—2,512 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Skvranch AZ,MDA, RZ, PP H-2024-0022 (copy this link into a separate browser). Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S 1131336031 Date Retrieved:2024/ 10/17 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 246 1,007 Surrounding Area 47% Not city 368 ■ City Limits ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:84.1°/° Population ■Growtfl (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses 0% ■ Single-family 25%' Multi-fam 100% ily 0% 75% Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed I I I I I Proposed Pending Pending I I Approved ] Approved 0 1000 2000 3000 0 0.5 1 1.5 ■ Single-family ® Multi family City of Meridian ' Department Report II. Community Metrics 2.00 500 Single-family y Residential 1.50 Parcel Diversity (A 1.00 N a� E3Parcel Count ;n 0.50 0.38 AAverage Acres 0.00 0-0 0.16 0 09 0 a R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 011.49 ResidentialDensity a 10.00 p 5.00 06.18 65,93 O 2.60 0.00 �a.aa Dwelling Units / Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Figure 3: ACHD Summary Metrics Q S. Meridian Rd Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes m Existing Level of Service Notable r Comments Q {Primary roadway impact] Programmed IFYP Programmed CIP *Traffic counts are from October 2023. E. Lake Hazel Rd Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes Existing Level of Service Notable r Comments Q {Primary roadway impact] Programmed IFYP Programmed CIP *E.Lake Hazel Road is currently under construction and is being widen to 5 lanes from S. Meridian Road to S.Apex Avenue. The level of service listed above is for the existing 2-lane road. Traffic counts are from June 2018. Figure 4: Service Impact Summary Ready Marginal Caution d s�a�y a <4� lb p x tie �\ L0 0 o °°`� o\a a �a Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. City of Meridian ' Department Report II. Community Metrics I11. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code (UDC) A. General Overview The Future Land Use Map(FLUM) designates the area proposed to be rezoned as "Mixed-Use Regional," which is intended to encourage a balanced blend of employment opportunities,retail,residential dwellings,and public uses,particularly in areas near major arterial intersections. This designation supports a diverse and integrated community where residents can live,work,and shop without needing to travel far. The area being annexed is designated as Medium Density High Residential. This designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses,condominiums,and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents.Developments need to incorporate high-quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways,attractive landscaping and a project identity. However,the applicant's current proposal is limited to single-family residential development, occupying the majority of the mixed-use designation area,and with no internal vehicle or pedestrian connectivity between the areas,which does not align with the intent of the comprehensive plan for the area. By focusing solely on an inward facing single-family home development,the proposal fails to meet the goal of creating a mixed-use environment that would foster a vibrant, self-sustaining community with neighborhood supportive uses, employment and/or retail options nearby. This lack of compliance with the comprehensive plan could raise concerns about whether the development will contribute to traffic issues, support a balanced community,or meet long-term growth objectives. For mixed-use developments to be consistent with the plan, they need to demonstrate the following elements,which the current proposal lacks: I. Functional Integration: Developments must show that even undeveloped parts of the area can be functionally integrated,either immediately or conceptually. The project should prove that all planned components can work together cohesively. Local connectivity is required to limit local trip impacts to the regional network,both for traditional single-family homes and in mixed-use areas. The current proposal lacks such connectivity and is located near a major regional intersection planned for expansion to seven lanes with additional access restrictions. Although the developer claims the proposal integrates with the surrounding commercial areas, no conceptual plans have been provided to support this claim. 2. Outward-Facing Design: The development should not be insular or turn its back on neighboring properties or streets. Instead, it should engage with its surroundings,promoting interaction with adjacent areas and developments. The planned development does not setup or support any future physical, visual connectivity with the remainder of the mixed-use area. 3. Physical Integration and Shared Features: There should be tangible connections between different parts of the development, such as shared amenities,walkways, or spaces. This physical integration supports local connectivity,making the area feel cohesive and accessible. City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis 4. Support for Local Services: Developments must intentionally create opportunities for local services such as office, gyms,retail,employment,or public uses. The current single-use proposal fails to support this objective, as it does not include any local services within the development. 5. Design Integration: There should be visual corridors or clear lines of sight connecting points of interest throughout the development. This creates a sense of openness and visual connectivity, making it easier for residents and visitors to navigate the space. The proposed development, however, is essentially isolated and does not provide connections to the property to the south. It is presented as a single-use development without the commercial component required by the Comprehensive Plan. 6. Purposeful Open Space: Open spaces should not be incidental but purposefully designed to enhance connectivity and functional integration. They should serve as common areas that bring people together and provide opportunities for interaction. The open space provided is solely for the purpose of the single-family residents and is not designed to integrate. The open space was not designed to integrate with commercial. 7. Pedestrian Connectivity: Pedestrian pathways and connectivity must be prioritized. Mixed-use areas should encourage walkability,allowing residents to move easily between homes, services, and public spaces without relying on vehicles. Pedestrian connectivity is crucial in mixed-use developments to encourage walkability. The absence of such connectivity in this proposal would force residents to walk along busy arterial roads to reach services and public spaces or depend on vehicles to access them Further UDC II- 3B-9 requires pedestrian connections between residential and commercial areas. 8. Limited Reliance on Arterial Roads: Vehicle connectivity should be designed so that local traffic does not depend entirely on arterial roads. Instead,developments should incorporate internal street systems that distribute traffic more effectively within the area. Staff and the Ada County Highway District(ACHD) are concerned that the short entrance road into the development could cause traffic backups along E.Lake Hazel Road.Additionally, the proposal lacks connectivity to commercial areas without requiring residents to cross a major arterial road, effectively isolating the development as a single-use area. The applicant indicates that residential uses will comprise between 10%and 30%of the development area, with gross densities ranging from six (6) to forty (40) units per acre within the residential portion. The proposed Skyranch Neighborhood in the Mixed-Use Residential(MU-RG) area would occupy 11%of the 219 acres,providing a density of 6.5 units per acre, aligning with the Comprehensive Plan's vision. However, the applicant did not account for the Comprehensive Plan's requirement that mixed-use areas bisected by an arterial or highway are considered separate, independent areas for use and design integration, and will be evaluated as such.As a result, the applicant's approach of using their property as a single-use area does not align with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for mixed-use development. It should also be noted that there are no discrete office or commercial areas left for development in south Meridian. All of these future uses now or later(with more roof tops) are intended to be provided within mixed use areas. The proposed project disproportionately impacts the ability for future services to be provided to local residents.Staff very regularly have trouble finding places for many of these users outside of industrial areas as they are not preserved for within the intended mixed-use areas. The area preserved for non-residential uses and the access and connectivity to these future uses fall well short of the text and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Given these requirements,the current proposal for predominantly and disproportionately large single- family residential development does not meet the intent of the mixed-use designation. The developer City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis would need to revise the project to introduce more uses, foster greater physical and functional integration, and prioritize connectivity for both pedestrians and vehicles in order to comply with the Comprehensive Plan or submit for a Comprehensive Map Amendment to move forward with the plan as submitted. Examples of an integrated mixed-use development below are Bown Crossing,Boise and Bethany Village, Oregon. 1 T. 1 1' °LEGEND - 1. Points of Interest Primary Local Corridor I • '' - (Visual and Physical) I. 7,77 :.r ,;' Secondary Local .r ��.,. r . ; r _ • ' Corridor(Visual end Physical) City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis NNW Building modulation with Shared : additional outdoor spaces Outdoor space Multi-story structures Op - � L n scaped Medians del Pedestrian scale 3- architecture and features t� -street Parking Street Furnishings -� - �- � .'�' �� Connected ' , Amenities Commercial_Anchor h Baekage Road Hold the Corners Central Commons -i, treet View Reference . — LaCd_tla a r f c 3 - ._ Loca*Iain Street" Dedicated Pedestrian Connectivity sari ty af:nor� residential :• huildmg types econdory Tier Commercial y , (e.g.-day cares.karate 'Essential No , a studios,spa.etc.) Services (e.g.-grocer) 1 1 1 A Community GrorerAncho 7i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Per the Comprehensive Plan "In developing the Comprehensive Plan, the City has typically designated Mixed-Use in areas of higher visibility (such as along arterial roadways). These Mixed-Use areas identified on the Future Land Use Map vary in size, intensity (both residential and commercial), and consider the visibility of the planned transportation network, number of residences planned within mixed use designation service areas, and location relevant to other commercial opportunities. The locations are intended to provide Meridian residents with a variety of opportunities for housing, leisure, activity, and commerce.Attractive and convenient prioritized elements such as multiusepathways are paramount to functionally reducing impacts to the transportation network through proximity and density ofservices. Contiguous Mixed-Use identified areas that are bisected by an arterial or highway are considered separate and independent areas for use and desizn integration and will be evaluated independently of each other. " Again, the applicant's proposal does not meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for mixed-use development as it does notprovide a mix of uses. Table 4: Pro 0ect Overview Description Details History AZ-H-2015-0019,DA Inst#2016-007088 Phasing Plan 6 phases Residential Units 284 detached single-family residents Open Space 7.49 acres/17.1%/0.72 non-qualifying Amenities Required: 9/Proposed: 30 _ Physical Features Rawson Lateral Acreage 43.82 Lots 284 Buildable Lots/28 Common Lots/6 Common Drives Density 6.50 dwelling units per acre City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis B. History In 2015, the City, at the request/consent of the property owners, annexed approximately 1,322 acres of land with the R-4, R-8, R-15 and C-G zoning districts. It was envisioned that some of the subject properties will seek re-zoning consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FL UM) designations in the future.At the time, no development was proposed with the subject annexation request and therefore a vast majority of the property(1,241 acres) was proposed to be annexed as R-4. All of the subject property owners signed a Development Agreement(DA) that was executed upon approval. Within each DA is a requirement that any proposed development plan be reviewed and approved as an amendment to the executed Development Agreement. Upon development/re-development of all these properties in the future, adherence to the characteristics of their respective land use designation described above will be required. During the annexation properties were assigned zoning districts as placeholders until the property owner came in to develop the property. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The current use of the property is agricultural with one(1) residential property existing. The existing structure will remain but will be required to hook up to the city's water and sewer system. The existing well and septic system will be abandoned as required. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant is proposing single-family detached dwellings which are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-15 zoning districts in UDC Table 11-2A-2. The future land use map identifies this area as medium-high density. This designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of eight(8) to twelve(12) dwelling units per acre. Per UDC 11-2A-7, R-15 is considered Medium High Density. Per the Meridian Comprehensive Plan, this designation allows for a mix of dwelling types including townhouses, condominiums, and apartments. Residential gross densities should range from eight to twelve dwelling units per acre. These areas are relatively compact within the context of larger neighborhoods and are typically located around or near mixed use commercial or employment areas to provide convenient access to services and jobs for residents. Developments need to incorporate high-quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place and should also incorporate connectivity with adjacent uses and area pathways,attractive landscaping and a project identity. The proposal covers forty-three(43) acres, of which twenty-four(24) acres are designated as Mixed-Use Regional under the Future Land Use Map (FL UM).However, the current design proposes a single-use development of single family detached residential homes across the site. This approach disregards the Mixed-Use Regional designation, which is intended to promote a blend of residential, commercial, and public uses, rather than focusing solely on one type of development. By limiting the development to single-family homes, the proposal fails to meet the objectives of the Mixed-Use Regional designation, which aims to create dynamic, interconnected communities where residents can live, work, and access services in the same area. This mixed-use concept encourages economic growth, reduces reliance on external roadways, and supports walkability and community cohesion. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.06.02B encourage and support mixed-use areas that provide the benefits of being able to live, shop, dine,play, and work in close proximity, thereby reducing vehicle trips, and enhancing overall livability and sustainability. City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis To comply with the Comprehensive Plan, the applicant needs to redesign the proposal and incorporate a mix of housing types (e.g., multi-family units), local services (retail or office spaces), and public amenities (parks,plazas) within the Twenty-four(24) acres of the Mixed- Use Regional area. This would not only align with the FL UM designation but also enhance the functionality and integration of the development with the surrounding area. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a mix of dwelling types within the residential area such as single family attached or townhomes within Block 8(lots 2-17 and lots 19-34) and Block 9(lots 2-17 and lots 19-34) of the proposed development as allowed by the Comprehensive Plan within the R-15 zoning district. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The preliminary plat and future development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 and 11-2B-1 Commercial District for the Mixed-Use Regional and the R-15 zoning districts. The proposed lots and public streets for the R-15 zoning district appear to meet UDC dimensional standards per the submitted preliminary plat. However, the proposal does not comply with Mixed-Use Regional designation. As mentioned above, the applicant needs to redesign the proposal to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Eight(8) common driveways are proposed with this subdivision. The applicant has provided common drive exhibits which demonstrate no more than three (3) units are served whereas a maximum of 4 units are allowed. The common driveway meets the minimum width of twenty (20)feet and does not exceed the maximum length of one hundred and fifty(150)feet. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited, unless separated by a minimum five (5) foot wide landscaped buffer. D. Design Standards Analysis The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. Staff finds that while the proposed lots comply with the dimensional standards for the R-15 zoning district, they do not meet the intent of the mixed-use designation due to the single-use nature of the proposal. Some block lengths exceed the 750 foot requirement and will necessitate a waiver from the Council.Additionally, the existing house that will remain as part of the proposed development abuts two streets, which is prohibited by the Unified Development Code (UDC). Furthermore, the lots to the north do not transition to align with the large estate-style lots zoned RUT within Ada County, which have a Future Land Use Map(FL UM) designation of Low Density Residential(LDR). Therefore, the applicant needs to revise their plat map to address the identified issues and demonstrate the necessary corrections. 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan 3.07.00, Comp Plan 3.07.01A, UDC 11-3A- 19): The current use of the property is agricultural with two (2) residential properties existing. The 6285 S. Tarrega Lane house will remain and potentially redevelop at a later date. The structures at 520 E. Lake Hazel Road will be removed and existing wells and septic systems will be abandoned as required. Per UDC 11-6C-3A.1, through properties are prohibited except where it is shown that unusual topography or other conditions make it impossible to meet this requirement. Through properties shall be limited to one (1)street access on one (])frontage, designated by a note on the final plat. The applicant needs to revise the plat to remove one of the frontage roads for Lot 40, Block 5. City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.0 encourages compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.0IA requires all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening, transitional densities, and other best site design practices. 2. Qualified Open Space&Amenities (Comp Plan 2.02.00, Comp Plan 2.02.OIB, UDC 11-3G): Based on the standards in UDC Table 11-3G-3, a minimum of 15%(or 12.05-acres) of qualified open space is required to be provided within the development. An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VIT F, that depicts 17.1% (or 7.49-acres) of open space that meets the required quality and qualified open space standards. Based on the standards in UDC 11-3G-4A, a minimum of nine (9) amenity points are required to be provided. The amenities proposed are a park with a community pool,play structure, seating benches, climbing dome, swing set; two (2)pickleball courts; dog park with waste station and sitting benches; and pathways. All common open space areas are required to be landscaped with one deciduous shade tree for every 5,000 square feet of area and include a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover per UDC 11-3G-5B.3. Although the applicant is proposing a berm, landscaping and fencing around the sports court, staff feels the location would be better if relocated to Lot 1 Block 10 or Lot 1 Block 7 away from the primary entrance to the subdivision which is supported by the Comprehensive Plan polices below. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.00 requires the applicant to plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.0IB requires the applicant to evaluate open space and amenity requirements for consistency with community needs and values. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets UDC 11-2A-6 requires a thirty-five (35)foot wide buffer along entryway corridors (N. Meridian Road and twenty-five (25)foot wide buffers are required along arterial roads (E. Lake Hazel Road).A twenty (20)foot wide buffer along all collectors is required. ii. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10, the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two (2) ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5) four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. The applicant shall add a mitigation section to the landscape plan for trees meeting the criteria above that are removed. iii. Storm integration Per UDC 11-3B-11, the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural,effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated,well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis stormwater facilities into required landscape areas, where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. Development will be required to meet UDC 11-3B-11 for stormwater integration. iv. Pathway landscaping Landscaping for pathways shall meet the requirements outlined in UDC 11-3B-12. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. On-street parking is also available on the proposed streets. i. Residential parking analysis The proposal will be required to meet the standards for parking as set forth in UDC I I- 3C-6. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan 2.01.01 C, Architectural Standards Manual): Four(4) conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed subdivision as shown in Exhibit VILL The applicant states the homes in the Skyranch Neighborhood will include 284 homes with a mix of different product types, two-story and single-story detached single-family homes. Buildings shall be designed with elevations that create interest through the use of broken planes, windows, and fenestrations that produce a rhythm of materials and patterns. Design review is not required for single-family detached structures. However, because the rear and/or sides of homes facing E. Lake Hazel Road will be highly visible, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs), bays, banding,porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from adjacent public streets. Single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. Design review is required for single-family attached and townhomes. Design review will have to meet the requirements outlined in the City s Architectural Standards Manual. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. To support this policy staff recommends the applicant provide additional housing options(i.e. townhomes, single family attached) in the development. 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-7. 7. Parkways (Comp Plan 3.07.01 C, UDC 11-3A-17): Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.01 C requires appropriate landscaping, buffers, and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors (setback, vegetation, low walls, berms, etc.). Per the UDC the minimum width of parkways planted with Class II trees shall be eight(8) feet. The width can be measured from the back of curb where there is no likely expansion of the street section within the right-of-way; the parkway width shall exclude the width of the sidewalk.Class II trees are the preferred parkway trees. The applicant is proposing parkways along the entrance to Street A. Street F. Street N and Street P of the subdivision. City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan 6.01.02B, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Per UDC 11-3A-3,the intent of these standards is to improve safety by combining and/or limiting access points to collector and arterial streets and ensuring that motorists can safely enter all streets unless waived by City Council. Comprehensive Plan policy 6.01.02E requires the reduction in the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity. Access to the property is proposed from E. Lake Hazel Road. Per the Idaho Transportation Department, no direct access to the State Highway System is approved. Due to the type and proximity of this development to SH-69, ITD is requesting a Traffic Impact Study(TIS)for the proposed development. Access is also proposed from the east side of the property via the future collector road. As the property is within close proximity to SH-69, the applicant will be required to provide noise abatement per UDC 11-3H-4D. Noise abatement could include but not limited to a berm or a berm and wall combination to help reduce the traffic noise. Staff has concerns about the length of the entrance off of E. Lake Hazel Road. The potential for traf is to backup when trying to access the site is greater with the short distance. 2. Pathways(Comp Plan 3.07.02A, Comp Plan 4.04.01A, UDC 11-3A-8): All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. Pedestrian connectivity is crucial in mixed-use developments to encourage walkability. The absence of such connectivity in this proposal would force residents to walk along busy arterial roads to reach services and public spaces or depend on vehicles to access them Further UDC 11-3B-9 requires pedestrian connections between residential and commercial areas. The only pathway required for this development is along S. Meridian Road. Other pedestrian connectivity is limited except along the arterial roads which does not meet the Comprehensive Plan policies list below. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.07.02A requires pedestrian circulation plans to ensure safety and convenient access across large commercial and mixed-use developments. Comprehensive Plan policy 4.04.01A ensure that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system. 3. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. 4. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): 7here are no private streets proposed for this development. 5. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Dead end streets No streets or series of streets that ends in a cul-de-sac or a dead end shall be longer than five hundred(500) feet except as allowed in subsection (b)of this section. The City Council may approve a dead-end street up to seven hundred fifty(750)feet in length where an emergency access is proposed;or where there is a physical barrier such as a steep slope,railroad tracks, an arterial roadway, or a large waterway that prevents or City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis makes impractical extension; and where a pedestrian connection is provided from the street to an adjacent existing or planned pedestrian facility.Cul-de-sac streets may serve a maximum of thirty(30)dwelling units. The applicant is proposing a cul-de-sac that exceeds the maximum five hundred(500) feet in length. The applicant needs to request a waiver from counsel for exceeding the maximum length for dead end streets. ii. Common driveways Per UDC 11-6C-3D,common driveways shall serve a maximum of four(4)dwelling units. In no case shall more than three (3)dwelling units be located on one(1)side of the driveway. The applicant is proposing six (6) common driveways that meet the dimensional requirements as outlined in the UDC. iii. Block face UDC 11-6C-3-regulates block lengths for residential subdivisions. Staff has reviewed the submitted plat for conformance with these regulations. The intent of this section of code is to ensure block lengths do not exceed 750 ft,although there is the allowance of an increase in block length to 1,000 feet if a pedestrian connection is provided. In no case shall a block face exceed one thousand two hundred(1,200)feet,unless waived by the City Council. It appears that some of the block lengths exceed the 750 feet. The applicant did not submit a revised block face length exhibit for review as requested. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways(Comp Plan 4.05.O1D, UDC 11-3A-6): Per UDC 11-3A-6, requires limiting the tiling and piping of natural waterways, including, but not limited to, ditches, canals, laterals, sloughs and drains where public safety is not a concern as well as improve,protect and incorporate creek corridors (Five Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile, Ten Mile, South Slough and Jackson and Evan Drains) as an amenity in all residential, commercial and industrial designs. When piping and fencing is proposed, the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-6B shall apply. The applicant needs to request a waiver from City Council to keep the canal open. Comprehensive Plan policy 4.05.O1D requires improving and protecting creeks and other natural waterways throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. City of Meridian ' Department Report III. Staff Analysis 4. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.03G, UDC I1-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. All utilities are available to the site. Water main,fare hydrant and water service require a twenty foot(20)wide easement that extends ten (10)feet past the end of main, hydrant, or water meter. No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A new Development Agreement(DA)is reguired as a provision of annexation and rezone of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation and rezone ordinance a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian the property owner(s)at the time of annexation and rezone ordinance adoption and the developer. Currently,a fee of$303. 00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. The current use of the property is agricultural with one(1)residential property existing. The existing structure will remain but will be required to hook up to the city's water and sewer system at the time of final plat for that phase. The existing well and septic system will be abandoned at that time as required. b. Future development of this site shall be consistent with the preliminary plat,phasing plan landscape plan qualified open space and qualified site amenities (i.e., a 5,000+s.f children's playground with a play structure swings,climbing rocks a climbing dome seating benches. within a safe fenced area two pickleball courts a pool with changing facilities and restrooms, and a fenced dog nark):,and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII as proposed,and the provisions contained herein., c. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face S. Meridian Road(i.e.,Lots 24-40,Block ) and the new collector Road(Sublimity Way) (i.e..Lots 2- 6,Block 1. and 2-5 and 7. Block )and E. Lake Hazel Road(i.e., Lots 8-19 and 21-32, Block 1) shall incoMorate articulation through changes in two or more of the following:modulation(e=g.,12Wjections. recesses,step-backs,mop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types.or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single story structures are exempt from this requirement.Requires Planning Approval prior to issuance of building hermits. d. The applicant shall adhere to the approved phasing plan that was presented at the December 10,2024,y12ublic hearing and shown in Exhibit VILE 4e-a4ewea to A&Rly aeavialAn -R Q=lase pew - k-a-re�ide�ildi�-,� €€ert�-�49a- -i-rre�-seep-pl�se.--fie ge�g-lip►i�atiee-�a_4-�e-inereased-�-ate-tee�8�-leis-at-�e-�eeit� gel � 13iree-ter' �1i��ien-: e. Future development of the site shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of development. f. The applicant shall provide the following regarding the closure of Tarrega Lane:: is Provide written documentation allowing the closure of Tarrega Lane. City of Meridian'Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments& Conditions ii. Prior to elan approval and ACHD's signature on the final Plat which would close the private road relocate the proposed location of stub street. Street O. to align with the existing location of Tarrega Lane at the site's north propel'line or provide written documentation that Street O can be stubbed to the north in its proposed location and that all 6 parcels who use Tarrega Lane will have access to Street Q. iii. If the applicant is unable to remove the private road then Tarrega Lane should remain within the site to allow access to the existing 6 residential parcels located north of the site. g. Provide a stub road from Skyranch Subdivision to the property to the south(parcels S 1131336156 and S 1131336111). Locate the stub street to allow for the future construction of a bridge crossing and maintain an easement for the roadway. The applicant is reguired to pay a road trust deposit for half the bridge construction to the Ada County Highway District, the actual amount of the road trust deposit will be determined during their plan review process. 2. The final Plat shall include the following revisions: a. Include a note prohibiting direct access via S.Meridian Road E. Lake Hazel Road and Sublimity Way. b. All utility easements reflected on the utility plan shall be included on the final plat. ��vise�he-plat-��shav�-�r-1et��-��endi�trie�-size-alen�the-Berth- da�_y ad ja�e�-te-�l�eeu�a--large-es�te--lets- d. All pathways and micro pathways shall be within a separate common lot or easement as required per UDC 11-3A-8. e. Access to Lot 40, Block 5 shall be restricted to either Street H or Street O. No access shall be allowed to and from the other street until the property redevelops. This shall be added as a note on the plat. f. Access for the six(6) homes utilizing Tarrega Lane shall remain oven until adequate access has been provided. 3. The development shall comply with standards and installation for landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-5 and maintenance thereof as set forth in UDC 11-3B-13. 4. The revised landscape elan shall include the following: a. A mitigation section to the landscape plan for trees meeting the criteria above that are removed. 5. The development shall comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3. including but not limited to driveways,easements blocks street buffers, and mailbox placement. Council granted a block length waiver for Street F as it exceeded seven hundred and fifty (750)feet in length. Traffic calming is required as the block length is in excess of one thousand(1.000)feet. 6. The applicant shall comply with the open space exhibit approved as part of this plat application that depicts 17.1% (or 7.49-acres)of qualified open space and exceeds the reguired amenity oints. 7. A 14-foot-wide public use easement for all multi-use pathways(Meridian and Lake Hazel Roads, as applicable) shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to submittal for City Engineer' s signature on the final plat(s). 8. Pathway and adjoining fencings and landscaping shall be constructed consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A7. 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12C. City of Meridian ' Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions 9. The proposed plat and subsequent development are reguired to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table I I-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district. 10. The common driveway shall be designed and constructed per the standards listed in UDC I I- 6C- 3D. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited, unless separated by a minimum five(5)foot wide landscape buffer.: 11. A 12eWetual ingress/egress easement shall be filed with the Ada County Recorder for any common driveway,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. This may be accomplished through depiction of the easement on the face of the final plat and an accompanying note. If a separate easement is recorded,a copy shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the final plat when the final glat is submitted for City Engineer signature.. 12. Off-street narking is reguired to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11- 3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 13. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B. as ap lip cable. 14. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-5.UDC 11-3B-13 and UDC 11-3B-14. 15. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed pool area prior to submittal of a building12ermit application.The design of the site and structures shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19 and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 16. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 17. Staff s failure to cite all relevant code sections or conditions does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. 18. Approval of a nrelimin=121at shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the cites engineer's signature on the first final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat. Upon written request and filing by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with subsections (A) and(B) of UDC 11-6B-7. The director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final Plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the director or City Council may require the preliminaa l2lat. combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of this title. B. Meridian Public Works See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=Oc&repo=MeridianCit X C. Meridian Park's Department See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919c&dbid=Oc&repo=MeridianCit X City of Meridian ' Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions D. Irrigation Districts 1. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orjz/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridia nCi 2. Boise Project Board of Control See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridianciU.orjz/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridia. nCitv E. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.omlWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X F. West Ada School District(WASD) or Other District/School See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X G. Ada County Development See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.omlWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X H. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) Staff report issued prior to final ACHD report was submitted to the City. https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X I. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.omlWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X V. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Council finds the Applicant's request to annex and rezone the subject property to R-15 zone meets the `general intent"of the Comprehensive Plan for the Mixed-Use Regional(MU-RG) designation and the requirements outlined in the UDC code based on the unique site constraints, access limitations on Meridian Road and the existing Rawson Canal. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Council finds the map amendment complies with the R-15 district regulations. City of Meridian ' Department Report V. Findings 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Council finds the proposed map amendment will not be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable) is in the best interest of city. Commission finds the annexation and rezone is in the best interest of the City because the proposed development provides housing options in an area immediately adjacent to currently proposed and anticipated future commercial development, with pedestrian and transportation facilities already provided. B. Preliminary Plat and Short Plat(UDC-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; For the reasons set forth in connection with the annexation and rezone findings, City Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the comprehensive plan and consistent with the UDC. 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Council f nds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Council f nds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's Capital Improvement Program. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Council f nds there is public financial inancial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Council finds the proposed map amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff is recommending denial of the project because the current proposal does not align with the intent of the comprehensive plan for the area. The proposal is limited to single-family residential City of Meridian ' Department Report VI. Action development,occupying the majority of the mixed-use designation area,and with no internal vehicle or pedestrian connectivity between the areas,which by focusing solely on an inward facing single-family home development,the proposal fails to meet the goal of creating a mixed- use environment that would foster a vibrant, self-sustaining community with neighborhood supportive uses,employment and/or retail options nearby. This lack of compliance with the comprehensive plan could raise concerns about whether the development will contribute to traffic issues, support a balanced community,or meet long-term growth objectives. In order to develop the property as proposed,the applicant has the option of continuing the hearing and applying for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment before the December 15t'deadline. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on October 17, 204. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subiect annexation,rezone and preliminary plat requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Hethe Clark,representing applicant b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Hethe Clark, on behalf of the applicant d. Written testimony: None L. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. key issues)of discussion by Commission: a. A lack of mixed-use and compliant with the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan. Limited connectivity - limited interconnectivity. Limited transition from adiacent properties and pedestrian safety concerns. 4. Commission chanae(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on November 19, 2024. At the public hearing. the Council moved to approve the subject rezone,annexation and preliminary plat requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Hethe Clark representing the applicant b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Sean Lanahan,Brian White Carsten White John Breckon,Marcella White d. Written testimony: Sean Lanahan Deborah Boyd e. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. Transitioning to larger lots on the north additional traffic coming onto Shafer View Drive from the stub road from the =posed development 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Connectivity to the southern property for cross access,transitioning to larger lots on the northern boundary of the proiect 4. City Council change(s) to Commission recommendation: a. Council revised condition#Id to reflect the applicant adhering to proposed phasing plan rather than the applicant being allowed to only develop one phase per year with a City of Meridian ' Department Report VI. Action residential building lot total of forty(40) lots in any such phase limiting 40 lots permits per year;removing condition#2c: and adding condition#lg City of Meridian ' Department Report 0. VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial Legend Project Location Area of Impact Analysis ' .` r 1I'M,4*1i � a� 1 r 2. Zoning Map Legend I Project Location J RUT Area of Impact 3 Analysis O R-4 1 R-8 R1 A Iu,;.. RUT R-2 R-2-RA-2— R 4 R;-8 R- 5 G-G R-]5 C-C R-40 R-!, R-4 a �� RR _ R=8� RUT City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 3. Future Land Use Legend IIM1II" Project Location Area of Impact -- m Low Density' Analysis Residential Ilium Density Residential 1 ..-----= High 1. Density MU-RG _:. Residential CIVIC - Med`Hi�h Density Residential 4. Planned Development Map Legend — r I Project Location Area of Impact 1 - -- :�-- .T City Limits EM — Planned Parcels e 1 0 Analys EMUpt y 1 - I r F _ -------i I - _ zJ ; { I 1 I { 1 h-J I 1 1 1 1j I .I I 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 rr I 1 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 5. Map Notes [Kea7rby Recent Preliminary Plats (within last 5-years) H-2021-0020 H-2023-0041 Nearby Recent Conditional Use Permits within last 5-years) H-2020-0009 H-2020-0057 H-2020-0117 H-2021-0021 H-2021-0036 H-2021-0087 H- 2020-0056 H-2019-0097 H-2022-0050 H-2023-0041 H-2024-0014 B. Subject Site Photos City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits f k I x 14 F f� f Now- s �. mac... . a�i..-.. 'mil.. .. ....•.. .-. �t_ 'x "'tikes:' E ski i �a ti' ,� ♦' e City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits s �w +�AN"P`ago '� u r _ City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S1131336031 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 19 8th Percentile Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains 500-2,000 ft. from parcel YELLOW Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of future pathways YELLOW Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets Arterial Road Buildout Status YELLOW plan) > existing (# of lanes)& road IS in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLOW School Drivability Not within z miles driving of existing orfuture school Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian ' Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Preliminary Plat(date: 5/22/2024) [ p fRELLM INARY RAT MR Y\ SKVRAN ELL SN@bIVI LON M= waaom summ •�••• Ykp .� e" _ L -- - - ---J PP1.0 City of Meridian ' Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Landscape Plan (date: 5/24/2024) _Ovamn-, a I o kh-1 i o m zYT. , . . . . . . r SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION = E E BELT& • u 6� PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN MERIDIAN. ID • -�-� rar sr.eox� ^" f . . . . . II.. - - 6 I Alme SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION as ,N j.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN MERIDIAN, ID City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Phasing Plan(12/5/2024) I -.. 51(YRANCH SUBDIVISION ILA r 45K+.IEi�N3.i1 OGRES m ,. „ o _ . „ . _ .. •� Ew IDTs l65o WfAO �' of �I �RE1A51ON GATE:12/5/24 tl® PR A N HAT FOR SKIM SU6UIV6VON .mow s rrz aru�srr ira orsanar sr, NnrrE eneE¢i rAsr.�rrnann —_—_ rm ar erm xrv.iEuyn um3 e � �u,E.•ar t, W!' 1!'ti" T.4liF Y -- -------�_ o+--� ram_-.�__--�-_--�-------- -- - PP 1.0 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 6/6/2024) NU ELLL !Ltj i �--LFTITI- I]'T]'1-[TZJT ! SKYRANCH SURUIMISION iOfAL AR[A._A3.S2 kC ry QWf1fYIWG 6PD131ACE.+ �. • ..------- e... _-_-_-_-_ - 0 MNG mF31 GPM[ _ NON-0LLYiYMG OPUi SPME •` . City of Meridian ' Department Report VII. Exhibits H. Site Amenities A. Park(Block 7, Lot 1) The one-ands-a-half-acre park will contain the following recreation facilities: Community Pool and Changing Rooms Fenced Play Structure Swing Set Seating Benches Climbing Dome Attractive Landscaping gv a� 2 gig RR�Y ast a• City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits B. Pickleball Courts (Block 1,Lot 1) the entrance to 5kyranch will feature: - -- -Two pickleball courts ` -Attractive landscaping IN r r l r ry �V C.Dog Parks(Block 4, Lot 1& Block 10,Lot 1)- both parks will be over one-third of an acre andh rr - feature: -Fenced Area -Waste Station -Sitting benches -Attractive landscaping r f • Iek LJ City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Pathways—The Skyranch Neighborhood will include the following pedestrian pathways. • 10'Regional Pathways will be constructed along Lake Hazel(1,200 ft),S.Meridian Road(500 ft),and Future Collector(604 ft)for approximately 2,300 L.F.total. 4 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits I. Common Drive Exhibit(date: 6/6/2024) 2 2 1 I r LOT 3 TAKES DIRECT STREET I ACCESS ORNEWAY LOCATED I / ON NORTH SIDE OF LOT. y. I 3 12.00' REAR I I f SETBACK TYPI I ` I 5-00• LSCP I ¢ j ® FFER N Y —� —J I 6LOCK 1 8 pyl 20.00 FRONT Y 10 9 I `SETBACK TYP=— —N�- YI 2�.00' COMMON LES DIRE IREE LOT 8 DRIVEACCESS. DRIVEWAY LOCATED $ _I - I a ON WEST SIDE Of LOT, N I o I I C—Sm/ F0 Box WS9 SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION OMMODMM7 LOTS 3-9 BLOCK 1 COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT *0' �n:{zoea�aa-�a7a c gra�+6�+e^4ineer9n9.avn City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits LOT 10 TAKES DIRECT MEEr I I I ACCESS. DRIVEWAY LOCATED I 3.00' SIDE x I ON WEST SIDE OF LOT. I 'SETBACK TW I I '► I I I o I 10.00' SETBACK I I ^N UTIL ESWF I I I I I I I I I BLOCK 2 i I o i I i l o� i � f I I I NN ----- I �----oil �-----f +-- ----I � _ I I 11s-so' � I s 5 I — I E ----------REA— I f � 12-00' R \ p9� SETBACK lYP �• � I 1 I F m 5 LOT 5 TAKES DIRECT STREET I m 1i �6.OD' 1•RONl ACCESS. DRIVEWAY LOCATED S,0B�K lYP ON SOUTH SIDE OF LOT. I 1 LS----- c5 W■ w o,..I.T I 9g 7! 30 SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION •'°°�i°' LOTS 5-10 BLOCK 2 COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT =r ' I�aa}saslera aya�mPmsmginemnQ m- City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits '��AmairtR- 25 2E 37 M 29 30 iiyy 3l ]] 34 i $ f-------{-- his Y�,nes dRlFdY 5lRftt — — _—_ — or a6r 9oE rm. I I --------- I _________ as RUR I I rzm Raw s I I 13 f I SErda:R,re I I__�'__pse.awe�II ^•i�90�"`?y� enaac m IsnacK ttR 1evm DaaxY I za:vo•mart I I � 0 5[IYYi lYP s[3s+C M 12A0'RFM I I -- zr —�uvus dNCY mmrt— I—^�--- I I i �oo�wa 3IXTlmm �� n Ni3 { rwz. c iw 17 6R�R� S C-c" rr v SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION LOTS 12-21 MD 35-39 BLOCK 5 COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits �x s� � o LOT 46 TA4S OIRELT STREET T AOGESS,0R LOCATIM ON WEST xSIDE OF LOT. P 43 42 20.00' FRONT BLOCKS �I SETBACK TW I . 47 46 _—__-----J ; V $ 5.00 LSW I BUFFER y 45 m 44 41 � i `\ I 20.00' COW90 12.00'FEAR SETBACK d LAl 40 TAKES DFECT STREET ACCESS TO THE EAST. 40 v .. 20 9 M -�"58 SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION BOLSE.19nEfe�s3o Hl" LOTS 43-46 BLOCK 5 COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT �i4[c r ro Pn:E]HH ayanem@m+mgineennQ mm City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits LOT 43 TAKES DIRECT SIREEr 10.00 3 SETBACK co, SIDE ACCESS" DllivEwAy LOCATED SE VTIL ESMT rRAcx 'ryp--T ON EAST SI E OF LOT. 39 40 Till- 41 43 43 42 1 45 c; J L T, I.- 39 '`< — #_—— a—J LOT 36 TAXES DIRECT ET TRE ACCESS. DRIVEWAY LOCATED ON SOLffH SIDE OF LOT- 12.00' FEAR FRONTJ EtR4,CK rrp SETBACK-IYP j 4 0 is 30 SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION n�tt.yb M76Y LOTS 36-43 BLOCK 6 COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits -7 —. G — — �—------- — [ - � a LOT 8 TAKES DIRECT STREET ACCESS. ORYEWAY LOCATED �c I 20 �w I ON WEST SICE OF LOT. ¢� I LU r I I SK TYPR ONT g=E W I- --------- 17 i 1S I r. .—_ —— 12.Oo' REAR T3 BLOCK 11 21 SETBACK TYP I o� 2D.00' COMMON ARfVV i a 22 p I t L---------� —I ———————————— `n——- 23 LOT 3 TAKES DIRECT STREET ACCESS, DRIVEWAY LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF LOT. ~ 24 Cc/ CIVi1L L:�TC •/•(o •• K - 15 9 1 S 5� POam6OS9 SKYRANCH SUBDIVISION EINI@.on 9AYer LOTS 18-23 6LOCK 11 COMMON DRIVE EXHIBIT SME ��' X Fl.:f2M Sae-W4 [graharn(p6W elx]IneMM1g.¢m City of Meridian ' Department Report VII. Exhibits J. Building Elevations Skyranch Elevations AR'[1 O—M 174 ! O A 1,7eo w rr twso�.fir. ' r"Aim t-i•{T City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits K. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map 5awtooth La d 5vrveyng, LLC r� F-- (2045)a56"104 F; (206)33845105 2030 5. Waahingtom Ave..Emmett.to 453,917 Annexation Boundary Description BASIS OF OBARINGS for this legal degalption Is North 89043'40"West,between a S18"rebaf with no op marking the S1/4 corner of Section 31 and an aluminum cap,PLS 7323 marking the U%thwest corner of Section 31,T,3 N„ R- 1 E.,B.M.,Ada County,Idaho. A parcel of land being the S1J2 of t#te SE114 of the 5 W 1/4 of Section 31,Tovmship 3 North,Range 1 East of the Soi52 Me,-idian,Ada County,Idaho, more particularly pesuribed as follows; BEGINNING at a S!d"rebar wikh no tap marking the SiJ4 corner of said Section 31; Thcnoc North$F`13'40"west,coincident with the south lino of mid LEO 4f tine SWV4,a dlisto—ej t WIN� feet to a 5113"rebar with err illegible cap maiking the W1116 corner of said Seabn 31; Thence leaving said south line, Morth 0008'07"West,cninddent with the west line of said SE 1/4 of the SW114,a distance of 669-16 feet to a 1:/2'rebaricap PLS 5359 marking the NW corner of said S112 of the 5EiJ4 of the SWIM, ThenCe South S9°g82V East,coincident with the north line of said S112 of the SE114 of the SW 114,a distance of 1304.93 feet to the east line of said SE114 of the SW114; Thence South 0°1413"West,coincident with said east line,670.94 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described oareel contains 24).D39 acres,more or less. 1 -- 6 1 574 �0 Tr P t2020i1 EMT1120050-WILLEMAN SUB CGiSurveyintawingsl6escripherico120G50-Ariri9x Legal.3ncx Page li City of Meridian ' Department Report VII. Exhibits � I r 4 ulFR OMT FM � e La i I I i D � i rmil �.. f- Ike i� I I I i I Ali! i ° ? $ WA-SWINGTaY AW. 12005aRO5 ANryb1W7T N 80U'✓ DARYfal MIT 64ME7T,10 EX17 APA OOLWTY,IDAFfO cunum GAOIF ' N18 398-9104 ORDJWT-0 F-�208 398.8105 120050 JJM7E 11G WwW.S4WTOO7M5CQ+ 10�, City of Meridian ' Department Report VII. Exhibits L. Rezone Legal Description & Exhibit Map Sawtooth Larid Surveying, LLC P:(208)398 8 r 04 f; (208)338 8105 2030 5. Washington Ave„ Cmmca.ID 83G 17 Rezone Legai Description BASIS OF BEARINGS for this legal description Is North 89143'4D"West,between the southwest corner and the 51/4 corner of Section 31,T.3 N.,R.1 E.,B.M.,Ada County,Idaho. A parcel of land bring a portion of Government Lot 4 of Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East of the Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at a 5/8"rebar with no cap marking the S1/4 corner of said Section 31; Thence North 89043'40"West,coincident with the south line of the 5W114 of said Section 31,a distance of 1300.52 feet to the W 1/16 corner of Said Section 31 and the southeast corner of said Government Lot 4, marked by a 5/6'rebar/cap lllegible; Thence North DO'08'07"West,colncldent with the east line of said Government Lot 4,a distance of 25.00 feet to a 5/9"rebar/cap PLS 2471 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 890434D"West, parallel with said south line,268.01 feet to a 5Je"rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence North 00'08'07"We5t,parallel with said east line,207.S9 feet to the centerline of the Rawson Canal, marked try a 5/8'rebaricap PLS 11574 witness comer,bearing south 00108'C7"East,41,63 feet; Thence coincident with said centerline the following three(3)courses and distances: Thence North 521136'37"Westr 295.49 feet,marked by a 5/8"rebar/tap PLS 11574 reference monument which bears North 32°21'59"Ea% 33.11 feet; Thence North 62130'36"West,403.28 feet,marked by a 5JS"rebar/cap PL5 11574 reference monument,which bears North 27106 31"Last,33.00 feet; North 63°03'23"west,292.73 feet to the easterly right of way of S.Meridian Road,marked by a copper plug PLS 12574; Thence North OS048'54"West,coincident with said easterly right of way,92.41 feet to an Idaho Transportation Department brass cap; Thence North 110606'16"West,coincident with said easterly right of way, 135.61 feet to a 518"rebar(cap PLS 11574; Thence North 00107'37"West,coincident with said easterly right of way, 380,98 feet to an aluminum cap on the north line of said Government Lot 4; Thence South 891153T3"East,coincident with said north line,1129.32 feet to the northeast corner of said Government Lot 4,marked by a found chiseled X In a stone; P 4262011 EMT1120050- WILLEMAN SUB CGtSurveykDrawings113e scrip lronSl120050-Rezone Legal docx Page 11 City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits Thence South 00008'07"Eastr coincident with the east line of said Government Lot 4,a distance of 1313.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 24,530 dCres, more or less. u 11574 01 t>>Y t2020 1 EMTt120430-4VtLLEM4N S U 8 'G1SurveyiDrawingq %Uesciiplion5 1200SC-Rezone Legal d ,tea l2 City of Meridian 1 Department Report VII. Exhibits —ivrO!♦YRW C1T7aYfC5 "+%l'!wq,rYne �M W M5 sa�szw — wafe ' GOVT LOT 4 SEC.31 7.3 N.,R 1 E.,B.M. 9 tl x� I 1 i I � 63..SV AG7k�b`3 #T v�l 1157 4`'t � nrearrr.wrw. � F � I 0 k4l — — — --- --- --- I a x i,xe ri r�r.Rf- arOPvrrw,awga7' wunse�elee 'syw trim a+s�a nr IB�nkIN� x�atar � PRO7Lx7 OWNfR/DE4LTUfl: DNTi J 2030 S.wASNrn=N AVE. REZONE BOUNDARY EMIOrr FMMM 10 83617 AD,4 COUNTY,IDAHO CONGER GROUP f� P: 208)398-8104 FADJr T* F:�208)398�BY05 12aOs0 DATE, � � Ga��2elcyi�J LLG WWW.SAV✓/ooTNLS.COM 1 OF1 City of Meridian ' Department Report VII. Exhibits VIH. ADDITIONAL NOTES & DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES, AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days. Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area, transitional development, government, and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2<5.0; R-4<2.0; R-8< 1.0; R-15 < 0.5;R-40< 0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones, may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries (TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size, configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources, including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information, existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review, using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F. Letter A represents free flow conditions, and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian ' Department Report VIII. Additional Notes &Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D, stable flow, to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians, nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs;or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian ' Department Report VIII. Additional Notes &Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Idaho Intrastate Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (IdWARN) Mutual Aid and Assistance Agreement Mayor Robert E. Simison ENID IA City Council Members: N ��� Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader, Vice President I Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts TO: Mayor Robert E. Simison Members of the City Council FROM: Laurelei McVey, PW Director DATE: 06/05/25 SUBJECT: IDWARN Mutual Aid and Assistance Agreement REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: 06/24/25 L RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Move to: 1. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 208-489-0365 III. BACKGROUND The City of Meridian Public Works Department has been a member of the Idaho Intrastate Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (IdWARN) since 2009 when we signed the original mutual aid agreement. While we have not requested mutual aid, we have provided it through IdWARN to other cities, like City of Eagle, during flooding events. The mutual aid agreements have been updated, and the City has been requested to sign a new agreement. Legal has reviewed and has indicated no substantive changes from the original agreement. Public Works sees immense value in partnering with other agencies in the event of emergencies, whether it be providing or requesting aid. This agreement establishes a framework, contacts,and legal protections for assisting and receiving aid. It is important to have these set up in advance of emergency situations. Page I of 2 IV. ADDITIONAL IdWARN INFORMATION IdWARN Network Mission To promote statewide emergency preparedness, disaster response, and mutual assistance for public and private water/wastewater utilities. How IdWARN Helps Idaho Utilities The Utilities Helping Utilities concept gives water/wastewater utilities the opportunity to be more resilient during disaster response and recovery. Because disasters transcend political jurisdictional boundaries, multi-utility coordination is crucial to protect lives and property and to facilitate the efficient use of available assets, both public and private. IdWARN is designed to provide quick and professional assistance in any situation that overwhelms the capabilities of a water/wastewater utility. How It Works No formal declaration of emergency is needed for assistance through IdWARN, and assistance can take the form of personnel, equipment, materials, services, or anything that your utility needs help with. A member utility may request deployment of emergency support to restore critical operations at the affected water/wastewater utility. Member agencies are never obligated to respond. IdWARN provides water and wastewater utilities with: • A Mutual Aid Agreement and process for sharing emergency resources statewide. • The resources to respond and recover more quickly from a natural or man made disaster. • A forum for developing and maintaining emergency contacts and relationships. • There is no cost or commitment to join IdWARN • Assistance is strictly voluntary. • Responding members are indemnified and held harmless from claims of loss, damage, and injury. • Being a member of IdWARN will make you eligible for FEMA disaster reimbursement in a federally declared disaster. • Access to a database of utilities and resources. • IdWARN is developed, managed and run by water and wastewater utilities. Page 2 of 2 MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK(IdWARN) This Mutual Aid and Assistance Agreement for the Idaho Intrastate Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network(henceforth referred to as "IdWARN") is made and entered into by public and private water and wastewater utilities and other interested parties that have, by executing this Agreement, manifested their intent to participate in the Idaho WARN. RECITALS A. Idaho Code section 67-2332 [previously 67-2335] authorizes one or more public agencies to contract to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which each public agency entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform. B. Insuring that water and wastewater systems provide and maintain water and wastewater services that promote the safety, health, comfort and convenience of the residents and visitors of Idaho communities is a fundamental function of government. C. Utilities in Idaho have a duty to provide and maintain their service to promote the safety, health, comfort and convenience of patrons, employees, and the public. D. The private and public entities executing this Agreement receive a reciprocal benefit by establishing processes to provide and receive assistance in advance of an emergency. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and obligations set forth in this Agreement, and the recitals set forth above, which are incorporated herein as if set forth in full, the parties agree as follows. ARTICLE I. PURPOSE Recognizing that emergencies may require aid or assistance in the form of personnel, equipment, and supplies from outside the area of impact, the signatory utilities hereby establish this Program. Through the IdWARN program, Members coordinate response activities and share resources during emergencies. This Agreement sets forth the procedures and standards for the administration of IdWARN for participating members. MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK- 1 170203 ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS A. Authorized Official: An employee or officer of an IdWARN member that is authorized to: 1. Request assistance; 2. Offer assistance; 3. Refuse to offer assistance; or, 4. Withdraw assistance under this Agreement. B. Emergency: A natural or human caused event or circumstance causing, or imminently threatening to cause, loss of life, injury to person or property, human suffering or financial loss, and includes, but is not limited to, fire, explosion, flood, severe weather, drought, earthquake, volcanic activity, spills or releases of oil or hazardous material, contamination, utility or transportation emergencies, disease, blight, infestation, civil disturbance, riot, international acts, sabotage and war that is, or could reasonably be beyond the capability of the services, personnel, equipment and facilities of a IdWARN member to fully manage and mitigate internally. C. Members: I. Member. Any public or private water or wastewater utility that manifests intent to participate in the IdWARN program by executing this Agreement. 2. Associate Member: Any non-utility participant approved by the Statewide Committee that provides a support role for the Program is a member of the Statewide Committee established under Article III, and that has executed this Agreement as an Associate Member. 3. Requesting Member: A Member who requests aid or assistance through the IdWARN program. 4. Responding Member: A Member who offers aid or assistance under the IdWARN program. 5. Non-responding Member: A Member or Associate Member that does not provide aid or assistance during a Period of Assistance under the IdWARN program. D. Confidential Information: Any document shared with any signatory of this Agreement that is marked confidential, including but not limited to any map, report, notes, papers, opinion, or e-mail which relates to the system vulnerabilities of a Member or Associate Member. E. Period of Assistance: A specified period of time when a Responding Member assists a Requesting Member. The period commences when personnel, equipment, or supplies depart from Responding Member's facility and ends when the personnel, equipment, or supplies return to such facility (portal to portal). All protections identified in the Agreement apply during this MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK- 2 170203 period. The Period of Assistance may occur during response to or recovery from an Emergency. F. Program. The interstate program for mutual aid and assistance established by this Agreement, also referred to as IdWARN. G. National Incident Management System(NIMS): A national, standardized approach to incident management and response that sets forth uniform processes and procedures for emergency response operations. ARTICLE III. ADMINISTRATION This Program shall be administered through a Statewide Committee. The Statewide Committee, under the leadership of an elected chairperson, shall meet at least annually to address Program issues. The Statewide Committee shall also meet at least annually to review emergency preparedness and response procedures. The Statewide Committee shall represent the interests of the Members and Associate Members. In addition, the Statewide Committee includes representatives from the following: United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA); American Water Works Association(AWWA); Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(IDEQ); Idaho Air National Guard; Bureau of Homeland Security (BHS); Idaho Rural Water Association(IRWA); Idaho Emergency Management Association (IEMA). Under the leadership of the chairperson, the Statewide Committee members shall plan and coordinate emergency planning and response activities for IdWARN. At its first meeting, the Statewide Committee shall establish initial membership of the committee and procedures for administration of the Statewide Committee, including meeting procedures and voting procedures. ARTICLE IV. PROCEDURES In coordination with the standards set forth by the Idaho Office of Emergency Management, the Statewide Committee shall develop operational and planning procedures for the implementation of the IdWARN program. The procedures shall be reviewed at least annually and updated as needed by the Statewide Committee. ARTICLE V. REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE A. Member ResponsibilitX. Members shall identify an Authorized Official and alternates; provide contact information including twenty-four hour access; and, maintain resource information that may be available from the Member for mutual aid and assistance response. Member contact information shall be updated annually, or when changes occur, and provided to the Statewide Committee. MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK- 3 170203 In the event of an Emergency, a Member's Authorized Official may request mutual aid and assistance from a participating Member. Requests for assistance can be made orally or in writing. When made orally, the request for personnel, equipment or supplies shall be prepared in writing as soon as practicable. Requests for assistance shall be directed to the Authorized Official of the participating Member. Specific protocols for requesting aid shall be provided in the procedures prepared under Article IV. B. Response to a Request for Assistance. Members are not obligated to respond to a request. After a Member receives a request for assistance, the Authorized Official will evaluate whether or not to respond, whether resources are available to respond, or if other circumstances would hinder response. Following the evaluation, the Authorized Official shall inform, as soon as possible, the Requesting Member whether it will respond. If the Member is willing and able to provide assistance, the Member shall inform the Requesting Member about the type of available resources and the approximate arrival time of such assistance. C. Discretion of Responding Member's Authorized Official. Execution of this Agreement does not create any duty to respond to a request for assistance. When a Member receives a request for assistance, the Authorized Official shall have sole and absolute discretion as to whether or not to respond, or the availability of resources to be used in such response. An Authorized Official's decisions on the availability of resources shall be final. ARTICLE VI. RESPONDING MEMBER PERSONNEL A. National Incident Management System. When providing assistance under this Agreement, the Requesting Member and the Responding Member shall be organized and shall function under the National Incident Management System. B. Control. While employees so provided may be under the supervision of the Responding Member, the Responding Member's employees come under the direction and control of the Requesting Member, consistent with the NIMS Incident Command System response protocol to address the needs identified by the Requesting Member. The Requesting Member's Authorized Official shall coordinate response activities with the designated supervisor(s) of the Responding Member(s). The Responding Member's designated supervisor(s) must keep accurate records of work performed by personnel during the specified Period of Assistance. C. Food and Shelter. Whenever practical, Responding Member personnel must be self sufficient for up to seventy-two (72) hours. When possible, the Requesting Member shall supply reasonable food and shelter for Responding Member personnel. If the Requesting Member is unable to provide food and shelter for Responding Member personnel, the Responding Member's designated supervisor is authorized to secure the resources necessary to meet the needs of its personnel. Except as provided below, the cost for such resources must not exceed MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK- 4 170203 the per diem reimbursement rates published by the State of Idaho Board of Examiners for the applicable period and location. To the extent food and shelter costs exceed Board of Examiners' per diem rates, the Responding Member must demonstrate that the additional costs were reasonable and necessary under the circumstances. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the Requesting Member remains responsible for reimbursing the Responding Member for all reasonable and necessary costs associated with providing food and shelter, if such resources are not provided by the Requesting Member. D. Communication. The Requesting Member shall provide Responding Member personnel with radio equipment as available, or radio frequency information to program existing radios, in order to facilitate communications with local responders and Member personnel. E. Status. Unless otherwise provided by law, the Responding Member's officers and employees retain the same privileges, immunities, rights, duties and benefits provided in their respective jurisdictions. F. Licenses and Permits. To the extent permitted by law, Responding Member personnel that hold licenses, certificates, or permits evidencing professional, mechanical, or other skills shall be allowed to carry out activities and tasks relevant and related to their respective credentials during the specified Period of Assistance. G. Right to Withdraw. The Responding Member's Authorized Official retains the right to withdraw some or all of its resources at any time for any reason at the Responding Member's sole and absolute discretion. Notice of intention to withdraw must be communicated to the Requesting Member's Authorized Official as soon as is practical under the circumstances. ARTICLE VII. COST REIMBURSEMENT The Requesting Member shall reimburse the Responding Member for each of the following categories of costs incurred during the specified Period of Assistance as agreed in whole or in part by both parties, provided that any Responding Member may assume in whole or in part such loss, damage, expense, or other cost, or may loan such equipment or donate such services to the Requesting Member without charge or cost when permitted by law to make such donation. A. Personnel. The Responding Member shall be reimbursed by the Requesting Member for personnel costs incurred for work performed during the specified Period of Assistance. Responding Member personnel costs shall be calculated according to the terms provided in their employment contracts or other conditions of employment. The Responding Member's designated supervisor(s) must keep accurate records of work performed by personnel during the specified Period of Assistance. Requesting Member reimbursement to the Responding Member should consider all personnel costs, including salaries or hourly wages, costs for fringe benefits, and indirect costs. MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK- 5 170203 B. Equipment. The Requesting Member shall reimburse the Responding Member for the use of equipment during the specified Period of Assistance, including, but not limited to, reasonable rental rates, all fuel, lubrication, maintenance, transportation, and loading and unloading of loaned equipment. All equipment shall be returned to the Responding Member in good working order as soon as is practicable and reasonable under the circumstances. As a minimum, rates for equipment use must be based on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Schedule of Equipment Rates. If a Responding Member uses rates different from those in the FEMA Schedule of Equipment Rates, the Responding Member must provide such rates orally or in writing to the Requesting Member prior to supplying the equipment. Mutual agreement on which rates are used must be reached in writing prior to dispatch of the equipment. Reimbursement for equipment not referenced on the FEMA Schedule of Equipment Rates must be developed based on actual recovery of costs. If Responding Member must lease a piece of equipment while its equipment is being repaired, Requesting Member shall reimburse Responding Member for such rental costs. C. Materials and Supplies. The Requesting Member must reimburse the Responding Member in kind or at actual replacement cost, plus handling charges, for use of expendable or non-returnable supplies. The Responding Member must not charge direct fees or rental charges to the Requesting Member for other supplies and reusable items that are returned to the Responding Member in a clean, damage-free condition. Reusable supplies that are returned to the Responding Member with damage must be treated as expendable supplies for purposes of cost reimbursement. D. Payment Period. The Responding Member must provide an itemized bill to the Requesting Member for all expenses incurred by the Responding Member while providing assistance under this Agreement. The Requesting Member must send the itemized bill no later than ninety (90) days following the end of the Period of Assistance. The Responding Member may request additional periods of time within which to submit the itemized bill, and Requesting Member shall not unreasonably withhold consent to such request. The Requesting Member must pay the bill in full on or before the forty-fifth (45t') day following the billing date. The Requesting Member may request additional periods of time within which to pay the itemized bill, and Responding Member shall not unreasonably withhold consent to such request, provided, however, that all payment shall occur not later than one (1) year after the date a final itemized bill is submitted to the Requesting Member. E. Records. Unless prohibited by law, each Responding Member and their duly authorized representatives shall have access to a Requesting Member's books, documents, notes, reports, papers and records which are directly pertinent to this Agreement for the purposes of reviewing the accuracy of a bill or making a financial, maintenance or regulatory audit. Such records shall be maintained for at least three (3) years or longer where required by law. MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK- 6 170203 ARTICLE VIII. DISPUTES If any controversy or claim arises out of or relates to the execution of this Agreement, including but not limited to an alleged breach of this Agreement, the disputing Members shall first attempt to resolve the dispute by negotiation. If negotiation between the involved Members does not result in the issue being resolved, the Statewide Committee will assist in the negotiation process. ARTICLE IX. REQUESTING MEMBER'S DUTY TO INDEMNIFY Members who are public entities shall be subject to Article IX only to the extent permitted by law. Specifically, the duty of a public entity to defend, indemnify or hold harmless any party shall not be extended beyond the appropriation of expenditures for such duty as required by law, including Idaho Code section 59-1015 and Article VIII, Section 4 of the Idaho Constitution. Further, the liability of a public entity shall not be increased by this Article beyond the extent required by the Idaho Tort Claims Act, Idaho Code Title 6 Chapter 9. The Requesting Member who is not a public entity shall assume, to the extent allowed by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, the defense of, and fully indemnify and hold harmless the Responding Member, its officers and employees, from all claims, loss, damage, injury and liability of every kind, nature and description, directly or indirectly arising from Responding Member's work during a specified Period of Assistance. The scope of the Requesting Member's duty to indemnify includes, but is not limited to, suits arising from, or related to negligent or wrongful use of equipment or supplies on loan to the Requesting Member, or faulty workmanship or other negligent acts, errors or omissions by Requesting Member or the Responding Member personnel. The Requesting Member's duty to indemnify is subject to, and shall be complied consistently with, the conditions set forth in Article X. ARTICLE X. SIGNATORY INDEMNIFICATION In the event of liability, claim, demand, action, or proceeding of whatever kind or nature arising out of a specified Period of Assistance, the Members who are not public entities and either receive and provide assistance shall, to the extent allowed by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, have a duty to defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless all Non-responding Members. MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK-7 170203 ARTICLE XI. WORKER'S COMPENSATION CLAIMS The Responding Member is responsible for providing worker's compensation benefits and administering worker's compensation for its employees. ARTICLE XII. NOTICE A party who becomes aware of a claim or suit that in any way, directly or indirectly, contingently or otherwise, affects or might affect other Members or Associate Members of this Agreement shall provide prompt and timely notice to the Members or Associate Members who may be affected by the suit or claim. Each Member and Associate Member reserves the right to participate in the defense of such claims or suits as necessary to protect its own interests. ARTICLE XIII. INSURANCE Members of this Agreement shall maintain an insurance policy or maintain a self insurance program that covers activities that it may undertake by virtue of membership in the IdWARN program. ARTICLE XIV. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION To the extent authorized by law, including the Idaho Public Records Laws, Idaho Code title 74, Chapter 1 [previously sections 9-337 through 9-350], any Member or Associate Member shall maintain the strictest confidence and shall take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent the disclosure of any Confidential Information disclosed under this Agreement. If any Member, Associate Member, third party or other entity request or demands, by subpoena or otherwise, that a Member or Associate Member disclose any Confidential Information disclosed under this Agreement, the Member or Associate Member shall immediately notify the owner of the Confidential Information and shall take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent the disclosure of any Confidential Information by asserting all applicable rights and privileges with respect to such information and shall cooperate fully in any judicial or administrative proceeding relating thereto. ARTICLE XV. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement and the Statewide Committee receives and approves the admission of the applicant. The Statewide Committee chair shall maintain a master list of all Members and Associate Members of the IdWARN program. MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK-8 170203 ARTICLE XVI. WITHDRAWAL A Member or Associate Member may withdraw from this Agreement by providing written notice of its intent to withdraw to the Statewide Committee chair. Withdrawal takes effect sixty(60) days after the Statewide Committee chair receives notice. Withdrawal from this Agreement shall in no way affect a Requesting Member's duty to reimburse a Responding Member for cost incurred during a Period of Assistance, which duty shall survive such withdrawal. ARTICLE XVII. MODIFICATION No provision of this Agreement may be modified, altered or rescinded by individual parties of this Agreement. Modifications to this Agreement may be due to programmatic operational changes to support the Agreement, legislative action, creation of an interstate aid and assistance agreement, or other developments. Modifications require a simple majority vote of the Members. The Statewide Committee chair must provide written notice to all Members and Associate Members of approved modifications to this Agreement. Approved modifications take effect sixty(60) days after the date upon which notice is sent to the Members and Associate Members. ARTICLE XVIII. SEVERABILITY The parties agree that if any term or provision of this Agreement is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms and provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced if the Agreement did not contain the particular term or provision held to be invalid. ARTICLE XIX. PRIOR AGREEMENTS This Agreement supersedes all prior Agreements between Members to the extent that such prior Agreements are inconsistent with this Agreement. ARTICLE XX. MISCELLANEOUS A. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the Members and no person or entity has any rights under this Agreement as a third party beneficiary. B. Assignment Prohibited. No party may assign benefits or delegate duties created by this Agreement and such assignments and delegations are without effect. MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK-9 170203 C. No Authority to Bind Other Parties or Partnership. Neither the IdWARN Program nor any party has the authority to enter into contracts or agreements on behalf of one or more parties to this Agreement. This Agreement does not create a partnership between the parties and nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to create an employer-employee, master-servant, a joint venture, or principal-agent relationship between any party in any respect. ARTICLE XII. INTRASTATE AND INTERSTATE MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS To the extent practicable, Members of this Agreement shall participate in mutual aid and assistance activities conducted under the IdWARN Program and the Interstate Emergency Management Assistance Compact(EMAC). Members may voluntarily agree to participate in an interstate mutual aid and assistance program for water and wastewater utilities through this Agreement if such a program were established. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Members and Associate Members executing a signature page attached hereto have entered into this Agreement effective as set forth in Article XV above. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the execution of signature pages. Each such counterpart shall be deemed as an original, all of which together with the terms herein shall be considered one and the same Agreement. [Signature Pages Follow] MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK-10 170203 SIGNATURE PAGE MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK(IdWARN) (Organization Name) Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-24-2025 Attest: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 Please let us know who you would like to be the main contact person for WARN activities, notices, news, and activations. Name: Position: Contact phone number: 20 - 50- 56 Contact email: MUTUAL AID AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE IDAHO INTRASTATE WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK- 11 170203 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Purchase Order#25-0401 to Hughes Fire for a 2025 Pierce 100' Ladder Truck for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$1,870,000.00 (� E N MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Keith Watts, Procurement Manager Meeting Date: June 24, 2025 Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: 0.00 Topic: Approval of Purchase Order #25-0401 to Hughes Fire for a 2025 Pierce 100' Ladder Truck for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$1,870,000.00. Recommended Council Action: Approve Purchase Order #25-0401 to Hughes Fire Equipment, Inc. for a 2025 Pierce 100' Enforcer Ladder Truck for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$1,870,000.00 and authorize the Procurement Manager to sign and issue. Background: The Budget Amendment for this truck was previously approved by Council on 5/13/2025. SE IDIANty Purchase Order 6/17/2025 25-0401 Attention: Josh Janssen CITY OF MERIDIAN Billing Attn: Finance Ave 33 EAST BROADWAY AVE. Meridian, IIDa Address: 83642 MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208) 888-4433 Shipping City of Meridian Fire Dept. Vendor Address: Address: 33 E. Broadway Ave, Ste. 210 Meridian, ID 83642 HUGHES FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 910 SHELLEY ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477-1975 Shipping Method: Contractor FOB: Destination Pre-Paid Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total 25-0401 Enforcer PUC 107'Ascendant Ladder Truck Stock#43139 Ea. 1.00 1,716,221.00 1,716,221.00 25-0401 Contingency for Options Dollar 153779.00 1.00 153,779.00 Purchase Order Total: $1,870,000.00 Purchasing Manager: Special Instructions One Enforcer PUC 107'Ascendant Ladder Stock 43139 Per Sourcewell Contract No. 113021-OKC-1 and Exhibit A - Purchase Detail Form dated 5/13/2025 Not-To-Exceed $1,870,000.00 08-2260-94120-11616 Ticket#127733 City of Meridian Standard Purchase Order Terms and Conditions 1. Entire Agreement. This purchase order;and any document referred to herein(collectively`Purchase Order"),constitutes the entire agreement between the City of Meridian ("City')and the Seller/Contractor/Contractor. Any item or condition proposed in Seller/Contractor's quotation,proposal,bid acknowledgement,confirmation,invoice or any other writing which adds to,varies from,or conflicts with any term or condition of the Purchase Order shall be void. The Purchase Order may be modified only by written instrument executed by the authorized representatives of both parties. 2. Shipment. All supplies shall be shipped F.O.B.Destination unless otherwise specified in the Purchase Order. When authorized,freight is to be prepaid. Do not ship collect. Original receipted freight bill must accompany the invoice. If shipment is not made within the time stated on the Purchase Order,City reserves the right to purchase elsewhere and charge Seller/Contractor with any loss incurred,unless delay in making shipment is due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Seller/Contractor and any of Seller/Contractor's suppliers or subcontractors. Packing slips,with Purchase Order number annotated,must accompany each shipment. 3. Hazardous Materials. Any materials required by this order that are deemed hazardous will be packaged,marked,and shipped by the Seller/Contractor to comply with all present and future federal,state,and local regulations and will further comply with any special company requirements. This may be noted on the Purchase Order. Material Safety Data Sheets are required and requested. 4. Risk of Loss. Unless otherwise specified,the Seller/Contractor shall be responsible for all supplies covered by this Purchase Order until delivered at the designated delivery point and the Seller/Contractor shall bear all risks as to any supplies rejected or required correction after notice of such rejection or correction is given by the City. 5. Inspection/Testing/Rejection. Payment for supplies delivered hereunder shall not constitute acceptance thereof. The City shall have the right to inspect supplies and to reject any or all supplies which in the City's judgment do not conform with the requirements of the Purchase Order. Supplies so rejected and supplies delivered in excess of quantities ordered may be returned to the Seller/Contractor/Contractor at Seller/Contractor/Contractor's expense and the City may offset that expense against any moneys otherwise due the Seller/Contractor/Contractor. 6. Invoices. Invoices shall be rendered in duplicate and shall include:(1)Purchase Order number;(2)pricing;(3)quantity;(4)description;(5)any sales taxes or use taxes as separate items,giving permit number authorizing collection of use taxes; (6)point of shipment;(7)method and class of shipment;(8)complete routing of shipment;and(9)whether transportation expense has been prepaid. Seller/Contractor/Contractor agrees to make a separate invoice for each order and shipment. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Purchase Order,all taxes,duties,tolls,fees,import charges,or other governmental exactions hall be deemed included in the purchase price of the supplies and services and the City shall have no liability to pay Seller/Contractor/Contractor or any third party any amount in excess of the specified purchase price. City of Meridian,a local governmental entity of the State of Idaho,is exempt from any Federal Manufacturer's Excise Tax under the provision of Section 4221(a)(4)of the Internal Revenue Code. All invoices shall exclude such excise tax. 7. Payments. Payments shall be made upon submission of itemized invoices per the payment terms and at the prices stipulated herein for supplies delivered and accepted or services rendered and accepted less any authorized deductions(if any). 8. Warranty. In issuing the Purchase Order,the City is relying on Seller/Contractor's skill and judgment in selecting and providing the proper supplies and/or services for the City's particular use. Seller/Contractor warrants to the City and its successors in interest that the supplies and services covered hereby will correspond with the description of the same in this Purchase Order will conform to all applicable specifications,will be new and of the best quality unless otherwise specified,will be fit for the purpose for which they are to be used and will conform in all respects both in the manufacture and use thereof with all applicable safety orders or regulations of the State of Idaho and of the United States of America. If a defect is discovered in any item of supply furnished or service rendered under this Purchase Order,Seller/Contractor/Contractor shall correct such defect at Seller/Contractor/Contractor's expense, including transportation/freight both ways,such defects as are reported to Seller/Contractor/Contractor within one year of final acceptance. Upon expiration of the applicable warranty period,all such warranty liability shall terminate except for latent defects,fraud,gross mistakes amounting to fraud,or as otherwise provided in the Purchase Order. Seller/Contractor also warrants that the supplies shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances whatsoever and that Seller/Contractor has a good and marketable title to same. Seller/Contractor agrees to hold the City and its successors in interest free and harmless against any and all claimants to such supplies. 9. Insolvency. In the event of any proceeding by or against Seller/Contractor in bankruptcy,reorganization or insolvency or for the appointment of a receiver or any assignment for the benefit of creditors,City may terminate this order without further liability except for conforming deliveries already received and accepted. 10. Indemnity and Insurance. Seller/Contractor shall hold harmless,indemnify,and defend the City,its directors,officers,employees,representatives,and agents against all damages,liability,claims,losses and expenses(including attorneys'fees)(collectively referred to as`damages")arising out of,or in anyway related to Seller/Contractor's performance or non-performance under the Purchase Order or the supplies or services provided there under or from any act or omission of Seller/Contractor,its agents,employees or subcontractors. Seller/Contractor shall maintain such public liability insurance,including product liability,completed operations,contractor's liability and protective liability,automobile liability insurance (including non-owned automobile liability)and workers'compensation,and employer's liability insurance as will adequately protect the City against such damages. Limits of insurance do not limit Seller/Contractors liability. Seller/Contractor agrees to submit certificates of insurance evidencing its insurance coverage when requested by the City. Seller/Contractor shall indemnify and save harmless the City from and against all costs,damages and expenses incurred by the City in connection with any claims or actions based upon infringement or alleged infringement of any patent and arising out of the use of the supplies furnished hereunder. 11. Changes. The City reserves the right at any time to make changes in any one or more of the following: (a)specifications,drawings and incorporated data where the supplies to be furnished are to be specifically manufactured for the City;(b)method of shipment or packing;(c)place of delivery;and(d)time of delivery. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the cost of or the time required for performance of the Purchase Order;an equitable adjustment shall be made in the purchase price or delivery schedule,or both. Any claim by Seller/Contractor for adjustment under this provision shall be deemed waived unless asserted in writing within 10 days from receipt by Seller/Contractor of the change. Price increases or extensions of time for delivery shall not be binding on the City unless evidenced by a superseding Purchase Order issued and signed by the City. 12. No Assignment or Subcontract. Seller/Contractor agrees not to assign or subcontract this Purchase Order or any portion thereof without first obtaining written approval from the City. 13. Disputes. All disputes concerning questions of fact which may arise under this order and not disposed of my mutual consent shall be decided by Designated Purchasing Personnel as defined by written City Policy. 14. Termination. The City may terminate all or any part of the Purchase Order at any time upon written notice to Seller/Contractor,unless otherwise specified in the Purchase Order. The City shall be liable at the stipulated price only for such supplies as have been delivered and accepted or for such services as have been rendered and accepted. The City shall not be liable for any excess costs arising out of such terminations and for the Seller/Contractor's failure to cease delivery and/or work upon receipt of termination. 15. Idaho Law. The Laws of the State of Idaho shall govern the validity,interpretation and enforcement of the Purchase Order. The City's rights and remedies provided hereunder and by law shall be cumulative. Certifications. Pursuant to Idaho Code§§67-2359 and 67-2346,Contractor hereby certifies: A. That Contractor is not currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not,for the duration of this Contract,be owned or operated by the government of China. B. That Contractor is not currently engaged in,and will not for the duration of the Contract engage in,a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. C. Consultant certifies that:(i)as of the Effective Date,it is not engaged in a`Boycott,"as defined in Idaho Code§67-2347A,of any individual or company because that individual or company engages in or supports(a)the exploration,production,utilization, transportation,sale,or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy,timber,minerals,hydroelectric power,nuclear energy,or agriculture,or (b)the manufacture,distribution,sale,or use of any`Firearm,"as defined in Idaho Code§18-3302(2)(d);and(ii)it will not engage in any such boycott during the Term. 16. Order of Precedence: The order of precedence shall be these terms and conditions,then the vendor/suppliers quote. If this PO is written to accompany a City issued agreement the City issued agreement shall prevail in the event of a conflict in terms and or conditions. City of Meridian Purchasing Department April 23,2010 EXHIBIT A PURCHASE DETAIL FORM Hughes Fire Equipment Inc. Date: 05/13/2025 Customer Name:CibLof Meridian Quantity Chassis/Body Type—Description Price per Unit One(1) One(1)Enforcer PUC 107'Ascendant Ladder Stock 43139 $1,716,221.00 TOTAL $1716,221.00 Warranty Period: Standard per HFE Proposal 43139 submitted on April 30,2025 Training Requirements: Standard ver HFE Pro osal 43139 submitted on A ril 30 2025 Other Matters: (a) A performance bond will not be provided. (b) Due to global supply chain constraints, any delivery date contained herein is a Good faith estimate as of the date of this order/contract, and merely an approximation based on current information. Delivery updates will be made available, and a final firm delivery date will be provided as soon as possible. (c) Purchased utilizing Sourcewell Contract No. 1 13021-OKC-1 This contract is available for inter-local and other municipal corporations to utilize with the option of adding or deleting any manufacturer available options, including chassis models. Any addition or deletion may affect the unit price. Payment Terms: Final Payment,including any changes made during the manufacturing process,is due 30 days after the apparatus leaves the factory for delivery. [NOTE: If deferred payment arrangements are required,the Customer must make such financial arrangements through a financial institution acceptable to Company.]All taxes,excises and levies that Company may be required to pay or collect by reason of any present or future law or by any governmental authority based upon the sale,purchase,delivery,storage,processing,use,consumption,or transportation of the Product sold by Company to the Customer shall be for the account of the Customer and shall be added to the Purchase Price. All delivery prices or prices with freight allowance are based upon prevailing freight rates and,in the event of any increase or decrease in such rates,the prices on all unshipped Product will be increased or decreased accordingly.Delinquent payments shall be subject to a carrying charge of 1.5 percent per month or such lesser amount permitted by law.Company will not be required to accept payment other than as set forth in this Agreement. However,to avoid a late charge assessment in the event of a dispute caused by a substantial nonconformance with material Specifications(other than freight),the Customer may withhold up to five percent(5%)of the Purchase Price until such time that Company substantially remedies the nonconformance with material Specifications,but no longer than sixty(60)days after Delivery. If the disputed amount is the freight charge,the Customer may withhold only the amount of the freight charge until the dispute is settled,but no longer than sixty(60)days after Delivery.Company shall have and retain a purchase money security interest in all goods and products now or hereafter sold to the Customer by Company or any of its affiliated companies to secure payment of the Purchase Price for all such goods and products. In the event of nonpayment by the Customer of any debt,obligation or liability now or hereafter incurred or owing by the Customer to Company,Company shall have and may exercise all rights and remedies of a secured party under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code(UCC)as adopted by the state of Oregon. THIS PURCHASE DETAIL FORM IS EXPRESSLY SUBJECT TO THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS DATED AS OF May 13th, 2025 BETWEEN COMPANY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN WHICH TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED IN,AND MADE PART OF,THIS PURCHASE DETAIL FORM AS THOUGH EACH PROVISION WERE SEPARATELY SET FORTH HEREIN, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT OTHERWISE STATED OR SUPPLEMENTED BY COMPANY HEREIN. 4 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB AGREEMENT NO. 30708 ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A&67-2328] Parties to Agreement: Ada County Emergency Medical District Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Services District Attn:Director 370 N. Benjamin Ln. Boise, Idaho 83704 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E.Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 22, 2025 ("Effective Date") by and between the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District ("District") and the City of Meridian("City") as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plan ("CIP") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 1 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County Medical Services District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements. 1.4 Board: Means and refers to the Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District. 1.5 Capital Improvements Plan and/or CIP: Means and refers to the May 24, 2024 EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study,which was prepared for the District and adopted by the Ada County Board of Commissioners. 1.6 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.7 City Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.8 District: Means and refers to the Ada County Medical Services District,Party to this Agreement. 1.9 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the District and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.10 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.11 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIP. The CIP is intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development,protect the public health,safety,and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers,privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the District and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 2.4. The District is responsible for providing emergency medical services on a countywide basis. 2.5. The District is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the District's ability to provide emergency medical services is affected by said development. 2.6 The District has provided the City with the CIP, which was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIP in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3) and 67-8208(1). 2.8 The District has requested that the City adopt the CIP in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however, that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIP. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIP and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The District, in cooperation with Ada County, shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The District shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIP with the City on or before June 30, 2025, to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIP prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB SECTION 4 SERVICE AREA 4.1 Idaho Code § 67-8203(26) provides that the Parties can identify a geographic area by an intergovernmental agreement in which specific public facilities provide services to development within that geographic area on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles or both. 4.2 The CIP and this Agreement define the Service Area as the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. SECTION 5 COSTS SPECIFIC TO DISTRICT 5.1 The District shall pay the following costs: 5.1.1 All costs associated with the Advisory Committee; and 5.1.2 All District costs associated with drafting this Agreement and any amendment or termination of the same; and 5.1.3 All costs associated with the District's performance of this Agreement; and 5.1.4 All legal costs and fees associated with any action brought by a third party concerning the validity of the CIP or this Agreement. SECTION 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 After the Advisory Committee files its written comments concerning the CIP with the City in accordance with the Act and Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement,the City shall consider the adoption of the CIP in accordance with the Act. 6.2 If the City adopts the CIP, the City agrees to consider the possibility of adopting a City ordinance concerning the countywide development impact fees delineated in the CIP, but only after (a) the Parties negotiate and agree on a new intergovernmental agreement for that purpose and(b)all the incorporated cities in Ada County have adopted(1)the CIP and (2) the ordinances necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. 6.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that: 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt the CIP; and ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 4 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 6.3.2 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt an ordinance implementing countywide development impact fees. SECTION 7 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 To the extent permitted by law, District shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for all claims, losses, actions, damages, judgements, costs, and expenses arising out of or in connection with any acts or omissions of the District related to the C1P or this Agreement. In the event of such claim,District shall defend such allegations,and District shall bear all costs,fees,and expenses of such defense, including,but not limited to,all attorney fees and expenses,court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses. SECTION 8 TERM/TERMINATION/AMENDMENT 8.1 Term. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2029, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 8.2 of this Agreement. 8.2 Party Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party upon ninety (90) day notice in writing to the other Party. 8.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the Parties. SECTION 9 NOTICE AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS 9.1 Notices. All notices,requests or demands to a Party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given or served upon the other Party by US Mail or email addressed as set forth below. 9.2 Contact Information. The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the District is as follows: Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Attn: Director 370 N. Benjamin Ln. Boise, Idaho 83704 With Copy to: Ada County Prosecutor's Office Attn: Chief Civil Deputy 200 W. Front Street, Room 3191 Boise, Idaho 83702 adacountyprosecutor@adacounty.id.gov ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 5 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 9.3 The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the City is as follows: City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 Third Party Beneficiaries. Each Party to this Agreement intends that this Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person or legal entity other than the Parties hereto. 10.2 Electronic and Non-Electronic Signatures: The District and City may execute this Agreement using handwritten signatures or electronic signatures, in accordance with Idaho's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The Parties acknowledge and agree that both signature methods are equally valid and binding for the purposes of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. Should any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, parties, or circumstances, for any reason be declared illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal or invalid provision had not been contained herein. 10.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted by the laws of the State of Idaho. Venue shall be Ada County, Idaho. 10.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements,promises,or inducements made by either Party, or agents of either Party, whether oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both Parties. 10.6 Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence for all events and obligations to be performed under this Agreement. 10.7 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party brings any action or proceedings to enforce, protect or establish any right or remedy under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to any other relief awarded. 10.8 Assignment. No Party may assign this Agreement or any interest therein. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 6 Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District DocuSigned by: By. A�� 4/22/2025 1 3:25 PM MDT Rod Beck, Commissioner DocuSigned by: By: 4/23/2025 1 12:06 PM MDT Ryan Davidson, Commissioner DocuSigned by: ��w-- By: 4/22/2025 1 3:58 PM MDT Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: DocuSigned by: 4/23/2025 1 4:16 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of Meridian By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-24-2025 ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 7 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Between the City of Meridian and Ada County Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 AGREEMENT NO. 30465 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A & 67-23281 Parties to Agreement: Ada County County Ada County Board of Commissioners 200 W. Front Street, Third Floor Boise, Idaho 83702 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 8, 2025 ("Effective Date")by and between Ada County ("County") and the City of Meridian("City")as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plans ("CIPs") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 1 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements. 1.4 Capital Improvements Plans and/or CIPs: Means and refers to, collectively, the May 24, 2024 Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study and the May 24, 2024 Coroner Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study, all of which were prepared for and adopted by the County. 1.5 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.6 City Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.7 County: Means and refers to Ada County, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.8 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the County and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.9 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.10 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIPs. The CIPs are intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development, protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers, privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the County and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. 2.4. The County is responsible for providing coroner-and jail-related services on a countywide basis. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 2.5. The County is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the County's ability to provide coroner- and jail-related services are affected by said development. 2.6 The County has provided the City with the CIPs,which were prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIPs in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3) and 67-8208(1). 2.8 The County has requested that the City adopt the CIPs in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however,that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIPs. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIPs and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The County shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee shall serve as an advisory committee to the Ada County Board of Commissioners and City Council and is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The County shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIPs with the City on or before June 30, 2025,to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIPs prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 SECTION 4 SERVICE AREA 4.1 Idaho Code § 67-8203(26) provides that the Parties can identify a geographic area by an intergovernmental agreement in which specific public facilities provide services to development within that geographic area on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles or both. 4.2 The CIPs and this Agreement define the Service Area as the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. SECTION 5 COSTS SPECIFIC TO COUNTY 5.1 The County shall pay the following costs: 5.1.1 All costs associated with the Advisory Committee; and 5.1.2 All County costs associated with drafting this Agreement and any amendment or termination of the same; and 5.1.3 All costs associated with the County's performance of this Agreement; and 5.1.4 All legal costs and fees associated with any action brought by a third party concerning the validity of the CIPs or this Agreement. SECTION 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 After the Advisory Committee files its written comments concerning the CIPs with the City in accordance with the Act and Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement,the City shall consider the adoption of the CIPs in accordance with the Act. 6.2 If the City adopts the CIPs, the City agrees to consider the possibility of adopting a City ordinance concerning the countywide development impact fees delineated in the CIPs, but only after (a) the Parties negotiate and agree on a new intergovernmental agreement for that purpose and (b) all the incorporated cities in Ada County have adopted (1) the CIPs and(2)the ordinances necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. 6.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that: 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt the CIPs; and ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 4 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 6.3.2 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt an ordinance implementing countywide development impact fees. SECTION 7 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 To the extent permitted by law, County shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for all claims, losses, actions, damages, judgements, costs, expenses arising out of or in connection with any acts or omissions of the County related to the CIPs or this Agreement. In the event of such claim, County shall defend such allegations,and County shall bear all costs, fees,and expenses of such defense, including,but not limited to,all attorney fees and expenses,court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses. SECTION 8 TERM/TERMINATION/AMENDMENT 8.1 Term. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2029, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 8.2 of this Agreement. 8.2 Party Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party upon ninety (90) day notice in writing to the other Party. 8.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the Parties. SECTION 9 NOTICE AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS 9.1 Notices. All notices,requests or demands to a party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given or served upon the other party by US Mail or email addressed as set forth below. 9.2 Contact Information. The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the County is as follows: Ada County Development Services Attn: Director 200 W. Front Street, Boise, ID 83702 dswebportalcontactus@adacounty.id.gov With Copy to: Ada County Prosecutor's Office Attn: Chief Civil Deputy 200 W. Front Street, Room 3191 Boise, Idaho 83702 adacountyprosecutor@adacounty.id.gov ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 5 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 9.3 The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the City is as follows: City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 cjohnson@meridiancity.org SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 Third Party Beneficiaries. Each Party to this Agreement intends that this Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person or legal entity other than the Parties hereto. 10.2 Electronic and Non-Electronic Signatures: The County and City may execute this Agreement using handwritten signatures or electronic signatures, in accordance with Idaho's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The Parties acknowledge and agree that both signature methods are equally valid and binding for the purposes of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. Should any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, parties, or circumstances, for any reason be declared illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal or invalid provision had not been contained herein. 10.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted by the laws of the state of Idaho. Venue shall be Ada County, Idaho. 10.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements,promises,or inducements made by either Party, or agents of either Party, whether oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both Parties. 10.6 Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence for all events and obligations to be performed under this Agreement. 10.7 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party brings any action or proceedings to enforce, protect or establish any right or remedy under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to any other relief awarded. 10.8 Assignment. No Party may assign this Agreement or any interest therein. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 6 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of Ada County Commissioners DocuSigned by: 4/8/2025 1 4:16 PM MDT By: �� Rod Beck, Commissioner DocuSigned by: 4/9/2025 1 2:14 PM MDT By: Ryan Davidson, Commissioner FDocuSigned by::V By: -0* 4/10/2025 1 12:21 PM MDT Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: Z gned by: 4/10/2025 1 2:38 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of Meridian By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-24-2025 ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 7 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2523: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Concerning 10.28 Acres of Land to Allow for Larger Estate Lots, Generally Located at 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Lane, in a Portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2523 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCERNING 10.28 ACRES OF LAND TO ALLOW FOR LARGER ESTATE LOTS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6101 AND 6162 S. TARREGA LANE, IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-302 to establish resolutions not inconsistent with the laws of the state of Idaho as may be expedient, in addition to the special powers therein granted, to maintain the peace, good government and welfare of the corporation and its trade, commerce and industry; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan was adopted in December 2019 as resolution 19-2179; and WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed it appropriate to amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan concerning 10.28 acres of land to allow for larger estate lots, generally located at 6101 and 6162 S. Tarrega Lane, in a portion of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 31, Township 3 North, Range I East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as depicted on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, all notices, hearings, and required information necessary to make a final decision as required by the Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act to amend the adopted City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6509, the City Council hereby amends the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map as depicted on Exhibit A under "Proposed Future Land Uses." A copy of this Resolution and the attached amendment shall be held on file in the office of the City Clerk. COMPREBENsivE PLAN AMENDMENT-MAP—MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION—x-2024-0067 Page 1 of 2 SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of June, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of June, 2025. APPROVED: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk COMPREBENsivE PLAN AMENDMENT-MAP—MONDT MEADOWS SUBDIVISION—x-2024-0067 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A L. CPAM Exhibit(date: 3/18/2025) I� 0 1.000 Feet Adopted Future land Uses Legendz ... . ....... ... a :..: rrn,v,c+,.,n�ae c W Ge futuro Land Uses � .... . .... ... ..... otyw.de - low Dcnslly Rmwential Medium Density Residcnlicil — 1.Acd-Hayti Denyly R(zsidcailial t s - Hiph Density Reside-irial i - Commercial LAKE HAZEI Office - tndustr o Civic Proposed Future Land Uses _ Ord town _ Mixed the Negt*"hood Mixed Use Community - Mixed Use Regional _ Mixed Use Non-Residential 1 Mixed Use-lntercharv,) Ten We Specific - low Domity Employmow _ Lifestyle Center I - - - .� _ High Density Employment C ® Mixed Employment W 1. ® Mixed Use-Residential --- -_--_-- - -' ® Mix—: u n.11 1 v LAKE HAZEI - City of Meridian Department Report VIL Exhibits E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2524: A Resolution Vacating a 3-Foot-Wide Public Utility, Drainage, and Irrigation (PUDI) Easement Located at Lot 31, Block 3 and a Portion of Lot 32, Block 3 of Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, Being More Particularly Described in Exhibit "A"; and Providing an Effective Date Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-039423 Boise,Idaho Pgs=5 vbailey 06/25/2025 08:32:26 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2524 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION VACATING A 3-FOOT-WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY, DRAINAGE, AND IRRIGATION (PUDI) EASEMENT LOCATED AT LOT 31, BLOCK 3 AND A PORTION OF LOT 32, BLOCK 3 OF STAPLETON SUBDIVISION NO. 4, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on June 10, 2025, the City Council of the City of Meridian held a hearing on the vacation of a 3-foot-wide public utility, drainage, and irrigation(PUDI)easement located at Lot 31, Block 3 and a portion of Lot 32, Block 3 of Stapleton Subdivision No. 4; and WHEREAS, after such hearing, the City Council, by formal motion, did approve said described vacation; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That a 3-foot-wide public utility, drainage, and irrigation (PUDI) easement located at Lot 31, Block 3 and a portion of Lot 32, Block 3 of Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, as fully described in Exhibit "A", is hereby vacated. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. Passed by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of June, 2025. Approved by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of June, 2025. Easement Vacation—Stapleton Subdivision No.4 H-2025-0024 Attest: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-24-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 24th day of June, 2025, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson, known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Easement Vacation—Stapleton Subdivision No.4 H-2025-0024 EXHIBIT A 5awtooth Land 5urveying, LLC 2030 5. Wa5hington Ave. �� rDOrf� Emmett, ID 83617 LansSurveyin.� -4-IG' P: (208) 398-8 1 04 F: (208) 398-8105 Lot 311 Block 3, Stapleton Subdivision No. 4 Legal Description BASIS OF BEARING is S. 89027'12" E., between a found 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574 on the northerly line of Lot 32, Block 3 of Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, as shown in Book 128 of Plats, at Pages 20770-20772, Ada County Records and a found 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574 marking the northeast corner of Lot 31, Block 3 of said Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, both in Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian. Lot 31 and a portion of Lot 32, Block 3 of said Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574 marking the northeast corner of said Lot 31; Thence S. 00032'48" W., coincident with the east line of said Lot 31, a distance of 99.76 feet to 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574 marking the southeast corner of said Lot 31, the northerly right of way of W. Norwich Street and the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right; Thence 45.71 feet along the arc of said curve, coincident with the southerly line of said Lot 31 and said northerly right of way, having a radius of 79.50 feet, a central angle of 3205637", subtended by a chord bearing N. 68032'52" W., 45.08 feet to a 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence N. 52004'33"W., coincident with said southerly line, said northerly right of way and the southerly line of Lot 32 of said Block 3, a distance of 27.54 feet to a 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence leaving said southerly lines and said northerly right of way, N. 00032'48" E., parallel with said east line, 66.96 to a 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574 on the north line of said Lot 32; Thence S. 89027'12" E., coincident with the northerly line of said Lot 32 and the north line of said Lot 31, a distance of 64.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel of land contains 0.129 acres more or less. r L ; r EI O "{ = 11574 g TE OF V3 P:\2022\1 EMT\122154-STAPLETON PH4 FINAL PLAT\Survey\Drawings\Descriptions\122154-Lot 31.docx Page 11 5awtooth Land Surveying, LLC 2030 S. Wa5hington Ave. O Emmett, ID 83G 17 - 11574 Lan�>`uivey,iq LLC P: (206) 398-8104 it/�12- 2-j S1 F: (208) 398-8105 I 7 of �`� BEA Lot 32, Block 3, Stapleton Subdivision No. 4 Legal Description BASIS OF BEARING is S. 89127'12" E., between a found 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574 on the northerly line of Lot 32, Block 3 of Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, as shown in Book 128 of Plats, at Pages 20770-20772, Ada County Records and a found 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574 marking the northeast corner of Lot 31, Block 3 of said Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, both in Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian. A portion of Lot 32, Block 3 of said Stapleton Subdivision No. 4, located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West of the Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574 marking the most northerly corner of said Lot 32 and Lot 33, being on the southerly right of way of W. Haniken Street; Thence S. 00032'48" W., coincident with the line common to said Lots 32 and 33, a distance of 90.29 feet to 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence S. 52004'33" E., coincident with said common line, 15.99 feet to a 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence S. 89027'12" E., coincident with said common line and the line common to said Lot 32 and Lot 34, a distance of 64.29 feet to a 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence leaving the line common to said Lots 32 and 34, S. 00032'48" W., parallel with the east line of said Lot 32, a distance of 66.96 to a 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574 on the southerly line of said Lot 32 and the northerly right of way of W. Norwich Street; Thence N. 52004'33" W., coincident said southerly line and said northerly right of way, 104.33 feet to a 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574 and the beginning of a curve to the right; Thence 80.95 feet along the arc of said curve, coincident with the southwesterly line of said Lot 32 and the northeasterly right of way of said W. Norwich Street, having a radius of 79.50 feet, a central angle of 58020'33", subtended by a chord bearing N. 22054'16" W., 77.50 feet to a 1/2" rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence N. 06016'00" E., coincident with the westerly line of said Lot 32 and the easterly right of way of said W. Norwich Street, 20.92 feet to a 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence N. 48024'24" E., coincident said westerly line and said easterly right of way, 17.44 feet to northwest corner of said Lot 32 and said southerly right of way of W. Haniken Street, marked by a 1/2"rebar/cap PLS 11574; Thence S. 89027'12" E., coincident the north line of said Lot 32 and said southerly right of way, 21.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel of land contains 0.140 acres more or less. P:\2022\1 EMT\122154-STAPLETON PH4 FINAL PLAT\Survey\Drawings\Descriptions\122154-Lot 32.docx Page � 9 5. Property Boundary Adjustment Record of Survey RECORD OF SURVEY FOR �c �r ace F719 LLC LOTS 31 AND 32.SLOCK 3 OF STAR ETON SLO3M SfON NO 61 LOCATEDIN 7TiE NE1N OF THE SETN OF SECI]ON ZS ^' "'� T 3 N.,R 1 W,6 M,CDYOFMERI NA COUNTY,R]o 2024 Y.2NTEd-,Y,To2% yyc .ems — - -. --_ SailaYu'f zip _.._.._.._.._.._ _ _.._.._ a,_.,_.._.._.._ Ik ` � rrvmnTirf r aeaRur 1. �\ - � � 9S4EY]f�OFX.N0.3142C1-IA]28-iDIM ZQ30 S.WA9}11V(i ION AVE .. s-(2 )3 8-8 N` (2QH)398-8109 FAX(M)398,B105 WWWS4WMMJISC0N City of Meridian Department Report V. Exhibits E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 25-2525: A Resolution Amending the Police Department Records Retention Schedule; Authorizing the Chief of Police and City Clerk to Implement the Schedule; and providing an effective date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2525 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, STRADER,WHITLOCK, TAYLOR, OVERTON, LITTLE ROBERTS A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE;AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND CITY CLERK TO IMPLEMENT THE SCHEDULE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,by the passage of Resolution no. 24-2494, City Council has adopted a Citywide Records Retention Schedule, pursuant to Idaho Code section 50-907(5); and WHEREAS, City Council finds that the following amendment of the Citywide Records Retention Schedule will realize efficiencies in the retention and destruction of Code Enforcement Records; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the Citywide Records Retention Schedule shall be amended as follows: RECORD DESCRIPTION CATEGORY RETENTION PERIOD i— ��3 i� i _ t Notre stispeeted violation f go;zo(g) Code Records created by code Semi- 5 Years Enforcement enforcement officers to permanent Incident document a violation or Idaho Code§50- Notes** investigation into a suspected 907(2)(g) 2020 u..,, violation of city ordinance that do not become a DRY management mea -S. Section 2. That the Chief of Police, pursuant to the direction of the City Clerk, the City's designated records custodian, is hereby authorized to supervise the retention and destruction of Code Enforcement Records pursuant to this amendment to the Citywide Records Retention Schedule. Section 3. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho this 24th day of June, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of June, 2025. AMENDMENT of RETENTION PERIOD FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT RECORDS APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-24-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-24-2025 AMENDMENT of RETENTION PERIOD FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT RECORDS E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: City of Meridian Financial Report- May 2025 City of Meridian Monthly Financial Report FY2025 May-25 Table of Contents Report Name Page Number Investment Graphs 2 Fund Balance 3 Aftj �I' rr-Cr fT r �j�E IDiAN-- F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25 -8 May Council Report 1 of 3 Monthly Financial Report �.�`' Y L E IDIAN�^-' FY2025 May-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Meridian Investment Portfolio Yield by Investment Type IDAHO STATE POOL 4.36% IDAHO BOND FUND Mi 3.94% CASH 0.00% FIB 4.51% •FIB MoneyMaricet$5,305,037 •Cash$18,232,118 MONEYMARKET •Idaho Bond Fund$78,510,117 •Idaho State Pool$113,094,183 City of Meridian Interest/Investment Income City of Meridian Cash/Investments Balance by Major Fund by Major Fund $4,000,000 $118,000,000 $3,500,000 $116,000,000 $3,000,000 $114,000,000 $2,500,000 $112,000,000 $2,000,000 $110,000,000 $108,000,000 — $1,500,000 $106,000,000 $1,000,000 5104,000,000 $500,000 $102,000,000 $0 $100,000,000 General Enterprise $98,000,000 General Fund Enterprise Fund ■Total Budget ■Actual YTD ■FY25 ■FY24 F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25-8 May Council Report 2 of 3 Monthly Financial Report FY2025 Ci�fIERIDIAN*,-, May-25 IDAHO 5/1/2025 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 $100,000,000 ■ $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $- 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 ■Nonspendable ■Restricted ■Committed ■Assigned ■Assigned Reserves ■Unassigned ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $- 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 ■Assigned ■Unassigned ■Assigned Reserves F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25-8 May Council Report 3 of 3 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of$550,075 for Employee Benefits Plan Trust U') N M d r N Cc W LO N cG V1 O O h I Z Z LO c i t O N 0 0 00 0 N N LO zO A � > > >" >" N a) 2 L=o o El El N aL m p L m HF7 "O1^. > J ua u mi N aa) cc id N y /1 Imo" v c 3 U v aci i u o m =I /F�11 _ co OIn Ln a y d E cc ) on a E o Q W m I O Q C v nv c ar = W O w O p m ) U 03 LO o LL w a ai ai w 0 3 N ui i H c £Lu M M m Y Z a M m y anc z z E N a O 4\, > GJ E s a E E m Q U 41 a� vE � o o _ r, F, C a) 0 Ym i p « tw m c o LA CN i w N O U c p 0Lr) O C O J LL Ln N a1 11p c v VV VV VV V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) � CU m Ln � Q m N ai o E c_ O _ o c O Q ++ 70 a) ~ ° Y — N t Q- 00 a ° � " m p v Q u T w c Q W a O aci Q sn c m } E rl n W � O o m Ln ° v (D 6 LA � ° ° o 70 c V1 Ln ~ ~ N L}L co N .. N T NCD Ln w H i m c N N ° L}i O a O a) a = m 0rn o CL x rL m E y y C o v c w a ami m = m (U a) m 0 E o cu ° r H > o C R L ° Q @ 0 O o CD E v oa G c a) c m Y o c c u c 0 0 0 M O O bo O O. m @ a O. op 3 V v v v ai p o y Q N w p LL 3 r p p U N E E N Y J O J J C U � \ " O N Y 2 bo N \ Q. a! m \ \ L7 jm > 'c V w O E (D X N (D l7 l d 0 LL CL W In W p 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 a a a a E 0 LL c O l0 O V a--I N M Ln lA E J O O �q O N N N N J N J J O \ N N N M O O O O \ O \ \ C V V V V V V V V ( V (D a) Q 4� h a c0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > u') o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 0 0 0 o .o 0 0 c h N � "M � � `m `m `m `m =X N (6 t � � � � � � t t � m � N `m `m `m `m `m `m �." N N N p > > > > > > > > W O > > > > > > > > > > > > > f3 p > > > > > > A p > > > } LL N cz CV N . . N VI VI VI V N N VI VI N N N _0 J J J J 7 7 7 7 3 3 J J J J J J J J J J J 7 7 7 7 7 7 J J J N NO y 0 0 0 0 O O O O =�„� O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a O `o 7 m m m o a LL > > > > > > > > O LL > > > > > > > > > > > > > V LL > > Uw > > > a fA a Cc Ll7 N _M c0 y fp S v a Ln y H yyj 0 C N ^ 01 r ` c 7 LL Y O m c v _ O O 7 r v p Ill m c Ill i m r a •c 70 m w m a cm h °' 40 o i EL., I = y =I a S a) I v _ C L Lri N Y N I a o O v n• lJ {/} C o O m f E C 2 a) O C Y C W Gl C. m m y c eap v '^ E CL `ti aCi E £ c ¢ E 'O u E Z W E p r m 'a a ° L v ts � 3 °' a 0 " Q_ C 7 N r+ 20 Cy v ul O O '^ a) a s y c p y 0 V m J v p j Li y y Q 41 y o LJLJ o o v a C too a L i 'O ,'�+ 7 N V ,O N G a v oD CD v W 'O m 0 L yCL) in a.° `o c 4 h C Y a '3 v E 6Y.6 cY6 - a •C 41° W C a m m Y •6 7 v m ~ 0..� r LYn C -O ❑ ii V cL ¢ ❑ 7 O 7 7 7 m .O pL y A A A A A A N u N u O u O w 1 7 a L] V = a a Ln 7 a a a ° 0 3 Y oNi E W > rn n CL v N m Z Ln u e Q N O a X a : H 0 a Ln O O L a -p C a O •p t N m f2 3 uCl) 0 O W U O tl N C Y m a �. a C } w L.L .y O O_ V C N 6 L M1. �n � OI Ln coLLJ y Y O.�_ N Y w O •Y a >_ a � a O a0, O a p a w v c m u u m m a; 7 Y _ 3 ai Q rn (v `6 a L C s p -O >- W ° N 7 m .0 L V Y 3 d 7 N O. i 0 n• cr a - v C an io i m 7 a a v LL u o Q p — m v m v a o = e LL LL c 7 m v 0 C7 fl- a Y ,CL m a £ a 0) a v a a ai v 70 Y LN+ y �' V m Y CI Y W j a .0 L 3 C taOL "O a 7 C� m O c Y c6 a c C" vL 7 G Y L a aL.+ y 7 Y 3 a = N O mco ai a s �' Im O C 7 OC a tY6 Z W O L ~ v a -p f6 C C U D- w E Y i a 0 0 } C O vui u 7 L >i m O r, a = Y v C n' m N Ln W N O. i w -p "6 m VI C O_ a v t +r m O w £ C Y -O � L m � a m } K O O U N M1J ` W V i m N N Y Q -0 f n a a O i.i m c a 7 -p Q O u O a O m M f6 Y U T a C '^ c6 v CL L N N N O O 6 7 n n 0 a Y E O to to V/ — v a y m a t 66 OL 6 a } C W 'p "p C C C_ N LO L m V Ol O 7 C m N C a E O m C w a O C U 4 L 7 E y E -O _ a W O > ry w Y'p "O a N w O U f6 > 7 Ln Y w O a u a L aL+ 6 Y O O OL aJ N N aL.+ a v1 a Y i M1. C O_ W G = N C - 7 = 70 .- c V7i E M -0 N a 00 W 0 6 E L Y O "O i 60 O N a C C L5 to j 0 i L 66 E 0 C _ m C a Y LCY)p W ++ m Ln Ln ^ n. ° c 7 0 v 3 an u v c c rn v y W } U) O O p YO L vL C. �O y., C) m u C }' twit O N a L.a N O O Ln 7 cu 7 m `1 C C Ln E L 7 +' N a O N a a m Y W L 7 7 i �+ LL (7 6 a s 7 O a 7 a O M1. L y 0 Q V1 N N N iR i L 7 w C C a �J U Y Ln i a N p vi c v ~ a c c E ° E p Q C vcu +� c a o £ w a na v o oan `m c n o a a a 6n E 0/p I m a E In m L a ate+ O C. C W X N E C o t N N } C LU .'^ L V O O v a a C a u C D m E O 7 _ (6 L6 ci O X to O_.+_' C 7 7 a E — m O O N 4_ PC O W d m L CO "t y Y a a a m a v E C N L.L N a .n O a a v a m c c c " a o o ° m Na Li y v Y m �p o 0 N C .0 LO m bD N O U L L L a N .Q m a O a a L m C W N Cp m 0 0 a L (6 y .0 c C) C) Q to Q p O m m W O H d O v H W a r O ni 2 co H c6 C7 ri > Z ri 60 m H U Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: E IDIAN�~� Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader,Vice President I D A H O Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts TO: Mayor Robert E. Simison Members of the City Council FROM: City of Meridian Employee Benefits Plan Trust (COMEBPT) DATE: 6/6/25 SUBJECT: FY25 BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,124,335 FOR SURPLUS FUNDING OF COMEBPT REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: 6/24/25 I. RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Move to: 1. Approve the $1,124,335 additional funding for the Health Plan Trust to provide an adequate surplus as defined by Idaho State Dept. of Insurance (DOI) and to cover anticipated/projected additional claims costs for the remainder of FY25. 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment 11. TRUST CONTACT PERSON(S) Bill Nary 208-489-0480 Christena Barney 208-489-0465 III. DESCRIPTION A. Backuound In 2020 the City of Meridian chose to create a Self-Funded Trust to manage health care benefits for its employees. This entity is responsible for administration and funding of these employee benefits. Under the guidance of the State of Idaho Department of Insurance, the Trust is required to ensure adequate funding is available to conduct business, pay claims and maintain a minimum surplus level of funding to ensure the natural ebbs and flows of claims costs can be covered by the Trust. The amount of surplus required is outlined under Idaho Code, §41- 4010(3). This equates to three months of contributions for the current plan year, or 110% of the difference between the total dollar aggregate stop-loss attachment point plus costs of operation and the total dollar expected contributions for the current year. Currently, the required surplus is $ 2,290,183. B. Reason for Amendment Due to higher than projected claims costs,the Trust surplus has dropped below the required surplus minimum. In addition, given the current claims trends, the Trust is experiencing a significant rise in claims. The Trust anticipates the need for additional funding to ensure that as claims are paid out, the surplus remains at an adequate level. As a reminder, the Trust operates on a calendar year basis. This amendment is intended to focus on the funding needs for the remainder of the City's fiscal year. It is the Trust's intention to keep the Council closely informed of claim costs and further fiscal impacts to the Trust as we move forward through the year ahead. The table below outlines the details around this request. IV. IMPACT A. Trust Funding Summary: Otr. 1 Statement Balance Sheet: Trust Balance Sheet Qtr. 1: Assets $2,219,108 Trust Balance Sheet Qtr. 1: Liabilities $2,219,108 Income• Trust Qtr. 1 (Jan-Mar) Income $2,290,183 Trust Qtr. 1 (Jan-Mar)Expense $2,710,314 Net ($420,211) Surplus Summary: Surplus Balance: Beginning of Year $2,159,084 Surplus Balance: End of Qtr. 1 $1,740,108 Required Surplus $2,290,183 Surplus Shortfall: End of Qtr. 1 ($550,075) Projected Supplemental Funding Needed: Surplus Shortfall (6.48% over Contributions) $550,075 Projected Monthly Shortfall (Trend Data Only) $95,710 Represents 13.5% over contributions Monthly Shortfall x 6 Months $574,260 Estimated Supplemental Funding Needed to Maintain Adequate Surplus and Operating Costs $1,124,335 V. ALTERNATIVES Public Works Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 200, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5500 . www.meridiancity.org The Trust is required to file quarterly financial statements to the DOI. It is possible the State could mandate action to correct a deficit in surplus if subsequent quarterly results indicate a deficiency exists. However, there are alternatives available as follows: A. The City could choose to not fund this request at this time. a. This would require the Trust to request an amendment at a later date to fund the full deficit amount to acquire adequate funding. B. The City could choose to partially fund this request with what is needed to reach the minimum surplus at end of Qtr. 1 ($550,075). a. The implications of this may lead to an additional budget amendment in the future to secure additional funding knowing the claims costs are continuing to rise. C. The City could choose to partially fund this request and stand firm in not supporting any additional surplus funding. a. The implications of this would require the Trust to shift the remaining costs to the employees. The result of this potentially impacts recruitment and retention. Approved for Council Agenda: Public Works Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 200, Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5500 . www.meridiancity.org Employee Benefit Costs Employee Benefits Plan Trust Source:MIP Reports>Statement of Rev and Exp>GL Code between 42000 to 43040 $ 550,075 Fund Code Dept Code Department FY2024Actual(Audited) %Allocation Allocation Across Departments 01 1120 Council $ 106,462 0.35% $ 1,919 01 1140 City Clerk $ 194,438 0.64% $ 3,505 01 1310 Mayor's Office $ 175,502 0.58% $ 3,163 01 1500 Finance Department $ 428,781 1.41% $ 7,729 01 1510 Information Technology $ 608,535 1.99% $ 10,969 01 1520 Legal Dept $ 226,224 0.74% $ 4,078 01 1540 Human Resources $ 305,481 1.00% $ 5,506 01 1840 OtherGovt/St Lighting $ 127,487 0.42% $ 2,298 01 1850 City Hall $ 828,573 2.72% $ 14,935 01 1900 Community Development Depts $ 1,582,794 5.19% $ 28,530 01 2110 Police Department $ 10,176,703 33.35% $ 183,434 01 2210 Fire Department $ 8,121,058 26.61% $ 146,382 01 5200 Parks&Recreation $ 2,275,269 7.46% $ 41,012 60 3200 Public Works $ 1,490,238 4.88% $ 26,861 60 3300 Meridian Utility Billing $ 191,735 0.63% $ 3,456 62 3400 Water Department $ 1,512,880 4.96% $ 27,270 65 3500 WasteWater Facility $ 2,165,287 7.10% $ 39,029 Total Employee Benefit Costs $ 30,517,448 100.00% $ 550,075 General Fund 82% $ 453,459 Enterprise Fund 18% $ 96,616 F:\Budget\FY2025\FY2025 Amendments\Archived Copies\FY2025 Budget Amendment Form_HR_Health Benefits Trust Cost Allocation E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Valley Regional Transit Fiscal Year 2026 Program Budget Request 26 Fund 'in a uestj"q P IIN ra Elaine Clegg - Chief Development Officerbob v11:311e re ionaltransit Y J _ S y j 1 FY2026 Funding Request • Recent Accomplishments � Al � j. • Current Projects • FY 2026 Funding Request �' vaIIG • MOU/Longer-Term Funding Agreement („ Recent Accomplishments � IDAH � • Focused service on more PUBLIC productive services in June of 2024 TRANSIT • FY2024 Ridership increased 1.5% VS. last year, following that service Connecting communities, change driving opportunity! • Implemented Beyond Access • Held the first CTAI Transit Day at the Capital to educate and convene transit agencies across the state CTA 40 2024 Meridian Network ,y Or an kd W McMillan Rd W Ustick Rd vV Ustick Rd E Ustick Rd v a m � C � F � Cherry Ln W Cherry Ln E Fairview Ave ° • t7 m w 4 z a 53 Z 0 4 u is N D Meridian mmijUmErFranklln•Rd E Frankrin Rd_ L1 Salim Lukes V.Ietn—,VVeteragg M Meridian - � !•�J;y� Medical Center V�g}�ygm►Vet®rar�s•Memorisl;Hwy FVctformams 0 MEL Aft m I W averJ Ed N a 0 m CL a W Victory Rtl W Victory Rd E Victory Rd w Victory Rd f a fr x C_ 0 4 311011 ft A D e 0 Mapbox Q QpenStreetMap W Amity Rd W Amity Rd S Amity Rd E Amity Rd W Amity Rd Fixed Route Ridership SService h n e City of Meridian - Ridership by route, by city and and fiscal yea Before . After Change Day 2024 Board Forecast Boardings by Route Boardings in Meridian only FY24 and M5 Fixed Route � Ill 9 Change /1/2023 - / � % Change FY2024 124 3/1/202 * 3/1/202 * 3/1/202 Forecast Ro L.Ite 24 0 16,534 N/A D 2,530 N/A 7,098 19,841 ROLIte 30 4,845 -13.3 4, 45 3,959 -18.3% 5,9284,843 ROLite 40 12r236 12,735 4.1% 2,593 , 4 24.3% 15,796 16,444 ROLIte 42 2'rC)(D9 30,50545.2% 3,937 4,026 2.3% 30,20843r862 R O Lite 45 5,0A 10,201 103. ,101 2,035 -3.1% 8,424 17,134 A 9 month period, not fuil year • Overall route ridership is up • Transit Activity in Meridian is up • Will explore alternatives for Route 30 Beyond Access Beyond Access Final Beyond Access Service Area Beyond Access 2024 Service Area Notus Meik ian OwNa mEo Deer flat National Wlldtlfe Refug ®Mapbox 0OpenStreetMap FY2024 Beyond Access in Meridian Launched : Replaced Harvest Transit in January 2024 Ridership (9 months) : 8, 780 Percent of all Trips Serving Meridian : 41. 3% Meridian Percent of Regional Population : 17.4% Meridian Percent of Ada County Population : 25 . 8% FY2024 Other Specialized Service Ridership Rides-2-Wellness 97971 157239 53% Veterans Shuttle 219 457 109% • Specialized services grew substantially in FY2024 Special Assessment Service Type Contribution Amount Beyond Access & Veterans Shuttle $ 164,323 Rides-2-Wellness $957600 Total $259Y923 • Contribution amounts same as FY2025 Current Projects • Beyond Access • Expand to general public • VRT Lyft Pass to High Ridership Stops • Village Stops, Blue Marlin, Ten Mile P&R, Ten Mile Crossing • Avg Daily Activity • Valley Connect (VC) 3.0 1 � f � • Expand Transit in Eagle _ 1, VRT Lyft Pass Park and Rides ? - --- W ChiAdl..li 0 E ChIr i SlVH } m Bun Stops a ^ m a o { O o - r2 p Z 6 z Z W McMillan Rd McMillan Rd Lyft Pass Stops Goldenrod Ave p tuighrierd w Feantl West West Vallev p �Ash[d� [lovrrd r VRT Lyft Pass x W Lstick Rd W UStick Rd E LJstirk Rd E Ustkk R I v � I � _ VRT On-Demand La keel ew Golf u = i� Club ,H Gateau pr a Ln - .,rh:_:ry Ln W Chemj Ln W Cherry Ln C Falrrlew Ave F W 1- h.l i,atr,L., m _ Ave Ada County U I i Merl dian HIhwayDistrict E Clu erdare and NdiT1Hd w- E Frank{In Rd V Franklin Rd g i i x t I r Wate mower St E Flam 4 �AYfi a a 2 u L .q v W Overland Rd m a Overland Rd Alrport Rd 1 3kgr tl y v 9 Howard Ln a Lamont Rd � o � f foe Ln n N PEasy let Cr I E Vlctary Rd F VFetory Rd W vlcmry Rd W Vlc[ory Rd W ViCtory Rd E Victory Rd E Victory Rd E Victory R. W Vi ctoiy.+:l I - y 4 � I m � Southwest I 'o Ada County I Travel Time VC 3 . 0 Meridian Network aHow far Weekdaane can go via transit at 07:00 on Y Jane's walking route follows the pedestrian network. Transit line wait times are based on frequency. TRAVEL TIME POPULATION 15 min 4,418 p 30 min 57,654 45 min 205,939 60 min 342,691 F R + , e . h a Ia Deer Flat National 1 lldli#e Refuge FY2026 CMeridian Fundming Request o Local Cost Allocation Methodology Type Amount General Assessment (calculated by regional share of the $ 86,469 population) Service Assessment (calculated by share of miles serving your $ 533,901 jurisdiction) Capital Assessment (calculated by share of miles serving your $ 0 jurisdiction) Special Assessment (Specialized services) $2597923 Total Request $880,293 • MOU or other Longer-Term Agreement Planning for the Future MOU or other Longer-Term Agreement Explore MOU or other means to outline longer term commitments, potential projects and goals Agreement to consider aligning current service maintenance, future expansion plans, future capital needs and an agreed upon expectation of base funding • Agreement to a process if those plans change Outline communications expectations for each Benefits of Longer A • No surprises - Align Service expectations with funding expectations • Understand upcoming capital and �- plan for or smooth transition over time. , L' • Develop a strategy to address growth ' • Agree on communication a and change process ; ~,4 • Allow advance g budget planning and g p , 1 } expectations - allow staff to work , together to do best work � { More Predictable Capital 5- Year Transportation Development Plan (TDP) • Outlines capital projects necessary I for maintaining services. • Majority of expenditures are ' • vehicle replacements. • Includes facilities maintenance and upgrades • Plans for federal assistance at 80% Lumpy needs (not the same every ' year) Can plan for lumpiness or smooth over several years Thankyou . ? va I leyreg i on a I tra ns it Elaine Clegg Chief Executive Officer 208-258-2712 t4 eclegg@rideVRT.org .................J.LI vaf ley rag imiol r.unsir l � o Aoo — Valley Regional Transit GL Account:01-1840-53803 Description of Dues FY23 Budget FY24 Budget FY25 Budget FY26 Budget Per Dues Worksheet-VRT-Annual Assessment 79,491.00 83,360.00 82,019.00 82,019.00 Per Dues Worksheet-VRT-Capital Assessment 25,804.00 22,361.00 12,514.00 12,514.00 Per Dues Worksheet-VRT-Local/Service Assessment 539,582.25 585,634.00 525,837.00 525,837.00 Per Dues Worksheet-VRT-Limited Stop Service 35,291.59 179,700.00 259,923.00 259,923.00 Per Dues Worksheet-VRT-Express Service 34,749.16 - Per Dues Worksheet-VRT-Harvest Transit Service 130,000.00 - - $ 844,918.00 $ 871,055.00 $ 880,293.00 $ 880,293.00 YoY%Change 3.09% 1.06% 0.00% YoY$Change $ 26,137.00 $ 9,238.00 $ - Boys&Girls Club gym use facility transportation 9,000.00 9,000.00 FY26-keep FY26 the same as FY25 per Todd FY25-March 28 Stephen going to send rough number and final numbers in April once they are done FY24-per Stephen Hunt<shunt@ridevrt.org>=$871,055 E IDIAN:--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Potential Public/Private Partnership for Sewer Line Installation Mayor Robert E. Simison E IDIAN -- City Council Members: -�� Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader, Vice President D A H C Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts TO: Mayor Robert E. Simison Members of the City Council FROM: Warren Stewart, P.E. City Engineer DATE: June 18, 2025 SUBJECT: Potential Public Private Partnership for sewer line installation REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: June L RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Obtain Council feedback and direction prior to the public hearing on the related residential development. II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Warren Stewart, City Engineer 208-489-0350 Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 208-489-0365 III. DESCRIPTION A. Background The City has been approached by a developer interested in entering a Public Private Partnership (PPP) with the City to construct a large diameter trunk sewer line. The City plans to construct the sewer in 2028, but the developer would like to partner with the City and advance the sewer line approximately 2 years. The project has the potential to significantly reduce the City's cost compared to the City completing the work independently. B. Presentation City staff have been working with the developer to create a draft agreement that could be utilized if the City Council is supportive of the concept. We would like to discuss the terms and conditions of the agreement and see if the Council would like us to bring back a draft agreement when, and if, the Council approves the residential development project. The actual costs necessary to finalize the agreement will not be known until the residential development project is entitled and the developer bids the sewer work out. Page I of I Public PrivatePartnership AGENDA Future Eligible ProjectsTiming of Agreement/ProjectAgreement development statusImportant Conditions for PPP Project Driving the AgreementConceptual Idea CONCEPTUAL IDEA City Council Approval Both Parties benefitAgreement Terms and ConditionsReviewed Agreements With Other CitiesDeveloper and City Collaborate on Infrastructure Projects PROJECT DRIVING Dayspring:Toll Brothers Wants to Advance Project by Approximately 2 YearsCity to Build McDermott Portion in 2028Currently, No SewerToll Brothers Dayspring ProjectIDEAPPP CONDITIONS Ustick Road not included.Appropriation Clause.-Agreement would include a NonCity would assign a Project Liaison for the work.City would provide Plan Review & Inspection at no charge.Developer would manage the design & construction process.would have built the project (2028).City’s share of cost would be paid in same year the City5% of bid amount.Change orders split 50/50, but City contribution capped at Price for work would be split 50/50.Project must be bid according to State Code.Year CFP.-Project must be in the 5Historic PracticeAGREEMENTF OR PROJECT DRAFT AGREEMENT We Are Here ConstructionFinalize AgreementBiddingEntitlementsProject Financial DataDraft Ready for CitySecond Review by BrothersReview by Toll Comments by CityReview and by Toll BrothersRecommendation Review and BrothersDocuments by Toll Example OTHER ELIGIBLE AREAS Council Approval with Each PPP AgreementElden Grey StreetMcDermott Trunk SewerExamples:City Driven Mainline Extensions are RareDevelopment Driven Projects are the Preferred Method BENEFITS doesn’t appropriate funds.Developer’s risk if future Council Doesn’t affect Rate Model–Timing of City Expense matches CFP versus ‘On Our Own’ ConstructionSaves Cost for City and Developer Advances Timing of Eligible Projects