Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-06-17 Work Session
E IDIANIHC CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday,June 17, 2025 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener,Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Vanguard Village Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0009) 4. Wadsworth Meridian Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 (ESMT-2025-0034) 5. Ada County Highway District Facility at 2023 Franklin Rd.Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0055) 6. Western States Equipment Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025-0057) 7. Frontline Subdivision Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0063) 8. Aviation Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0064) 9. Final Plat for Apex Phenomenal (FP-2025-0005), by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/2 mile east of S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. 10. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Centrepointe Apartments (H-2025-0009) by Mike Maffia, MGM Meridian 2, located at 3100 Centrepointe Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. 11. Temporary Right-of-Way Easement Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian at Apex Southeast Subdivision No. 3 (South Side of Discovery Park) 12. Development Agreement (Core &Main H-2024-0066) Between City of Meridian and Core &Main LP for Property Located at 299 S. Black Cat Rd. 13. Development Agreement (330 N. Linder Rd.) Between City of Meridian and Rinker Properties LLC for Property Located at 330 N. Linder Rd. 14. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of$(11,600) to accept donation from Boise Area Pickleball Association 15. Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park for Meridian Fine Arts Festival 16. Ada County Highway District Cost Share Permit for Landscape Medians on Ustick Rd., Black Cat Rd. to Ten Mile Rd. 17. Resolution 25-2520: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy 4.5, Regarding Bereavement Leave; and Providing an Effective Date 18. Resolution No. 25-2521: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Concerning 5.0 Acres of Land for the Expansion of the Black Cat Business Center, Generally Located at 299 S. Black Cat Road, in a Portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho; and Providing an Effective Date 19. Resolution No. 25-2522: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian Appointing Members of the Compensation Committee; and Providing an Effective Date ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] PROCLAMATIONS 20. Mountain View High School Girls Track State Champions Day 21. Mountain View High School Boys Track State Champions Day DEPARTMENT/ COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 22. Community Center Design Update 23. Homecourt Fee Discussion 24. Potential Ballot Question Concerning a Levy to Provide Funding for Firefighters, Police Officers, and a Prosecution Unit 25. Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements Concerning Countywide Development Impact Fees Discussion Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener ORDINANCES 26. Ordinance No. 25-2086: An ordinance (330 N. Linder Rd. - H-2024-0048) annexing Lot 3 of Heppers Acre Subdivision (a recorded plat on file in Book 20 of Plats at Page 1298, records of Ada County, Idaho) and a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit"A'; rezoning 0.983 acres of such real property from R1 (Estate Residential) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor,the Ada County Treasurer,the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date.Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 27. Ordinance No. 25-2087: An ordinance (Core & Main - H-2024-0066) annexing a parcel of land located in a portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit"A'; rezoning 5.0 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor,the Ada County Treasurer,the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Cavener. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener ADJOURNMENT 6:42 PM Meridian City Council Work Session June 17, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, June 17, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Steve Siddoway, Garrett White, Kurt Starman, Shawn Harper and Steve Taulbee. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts X John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is June 17th, 2025, at 4:30 in the afternoon. We will begin this City Council work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mayor, Members of the Council, it always impresses me we have so many high school students in our attendance, even more so during summer vacation, and so while we have some great proclamations to read they are currently on our agenda at the end, so, Council, Mr. Mayor, I move that we actually move those up on our agenda to after items after our Consent Agenda. So, we have that listed as proclamations -- a proclamation for Mountain View High School Girls State Track Champions Day and, then, following that Mountain View High School Boys State Track Champions Day and with that, Mr. Mayor, I move that we adopt the agenda as amended. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted as amended. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 2 of 46 CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Vanguard Village Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0009) 4. Wadsworth Meridian Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 (ESMT- 2025-0034) 5. Ada County Highway District Facility at 2023 Franklin Rd. Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0055) 6. Western States Equipment Water Main Easement Release (ESMT- 2025-0057) 7. Frontline Subdivision Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0063) 8. Aviation Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0064) 9. Final Plat for Apex Phenomenal (FP-2025-0005), by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/2 mile east of S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. 10. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Centrepointe Apartments (H-2025-0009) by Mike Maffia, MGM Meridian 2, located at 3100 Centrepointe Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. 11. Temporary Right-of-Way Easement Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian at Apex Southeast Subdivision No. 3 (South Side of Discovery Park) 12. Development Agreement (Core & Main H-2024-0066) Between City of Meridian and Core & Main LP for Property Located at 299 S. Black Cat Rd. 13. Development Agreement (330 N. Linder Rd.) Between City of Meridian and Rinker Properties LLC for Property Located at 330 N. Linder Rd. 14. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $(11,600) to accept donation from Boise Area Pickleball Association Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 3 of 46 15. Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park for Meridian Fine Arts Festival 16. Ada County Highway District Cost Share Permit for Landscape Medians on Ustick Rd., Black Cat Rd. to Ten Mile Rd. 17. Resolution 25-2520: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy 4.5, Regarding Bereavement Leave; and Providing an Effective Date 18. Resolution No. 25-2521: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Concerning 5.0 Acres of Land for the Expansion of the Black Cat Business Center, Generally Located at 299 S. Black Cat Road, in a Portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; and Providing an Effective Date 19. Resolution No. 25-2522: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian Appointing Members of the Compensation Committee; and Providing an Effective Date Simison: Up next to the Consent Agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we approve the Consent Agenda. For the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items removed from the Consent Agenda. PROCLAMATIONS 20. Mountain View High School Girls Track State Champions Day Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 4 of 46 21. Mountain View High School Boys Track State Champions Day Simison: So as was noted we will move down to the podium for our proclamations. If I could have the coaches and the team join me at the podium that would be great and we can do them all men and women at the same time or we can do them separately. I will let you all decide how you want to approach that. That way everyone out there can see it real good. Whatever works. They are not going to like spread out themselves. They like to get comfortable, so -- all right. I -- I think we are -- we are getting everyone squared away officially. So, when these first came across my desk they were one proclamation to begin with, but I said no, no, no, no, we -- we got to separate these out. So, we are going to read two proclamations and, then, I will turn it over to the coaches for any comments and afterwards we will ask each member to come forward and just state their name and what year you are in school and what activities -- or what events you participate in through that process. But as a proud southside member wearing my -- my -- my kicks for the colors -- it's about as close as I could get to -- for -- for -- for Mountain View, but what -- what -- the fact that we get to have you all here today. So, with that we will first do the boys proclamation. Whereas being a Mountain View High School boys track team member is more than sprints, relays, hurdles, field events and achieving state titles, it is training to build leadership, character, confidence, teamwork and resilience, all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world and whereas the Mountain View Boys Track won the District 3 State championship with a score of 117 points and stole the show at the Idaho State 5A-6A championship meet with a one hundred point score that allowed the Mavericks to knock eight time defending state champion and whereas multiple student athletes achieve personal records and contribute to an unforgettable team victory to bring home the first boys track and field state title in program history for Mountain View and whereas the leadership, training and discipline of their coaches helped all team members to focus their talents and passion, become a winning team, with each player making valuable contributions to their victory. Therefore, I'm, Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim June 17th, 2025, as Mountain View's High School Boys Track State Champions Day in the City of Meridian and call upon the community to join me in congratulating the Mountain View Mays on their remarkable athletic achievement and for representing Meridian so proudly in the state tournament, dated this 17th day of June 2025. So, let's give a round of applause for them. And now we will do the one for the ladies. Whereas being a Mountain View High School Girls Track Team member is more than sprints, relays, hurdles, field events and achieving state titles, it is training to build leadership, character, confidence, teamwork and resilience, all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world and whereas the Mountain View Girls Track and Field Team won the 6A meet with an impressive 93 points, making a statement that the Mavericks are the team to beat and whereas multiple student athletes achieved personal records and contribute to an unforgettable team victory to bring the first girls state title for The Mavericks since 2018 and whereas the leadership, training and discipline of their coaches helped all team members to focus their talents and passion, become a winning team with each player making valuable contributions to their victory. Therefore, 1, Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim June 17th, 2025, as Mountain View High School Girls Track State Champions Day in the City of Meridian and call Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 5 of 46 upon the community to join me in congratulating the Mountain View Mays on a remarkable athletic achievement for representing Meridian so proudly in the State tournament. Dated this 17th day of June 2025. Give them a round of applause. And now I will invite the coaches up to say some words. I just want to say, you know, I know it's summer, but we definitely appreciate everyone's time coming out today. So, coaches. Alexander: I just want to say thank you. Thank you to the kids. And thank you to the Mayor for this honor. I appreciate you. Genette: My name is Cashton Genette. I did the 100, 200 4-by-1 and 4-by-2. Johnson: I'm Taysia Johnson. I'm a senior and I ran the 4-by-2. Stewart: My name is Beau Stewart. I'm class of '27. 1 did the 100, long jump and the 4-by-1. Osman: My name is Omar Osman. I competed in long jump. Keller: My name is Quincy Keller. I did the 4-by-1, 4-by-2, 100 and 200 and I will be a senior. Scott: My name is Behr Scott. I did the 100, 200 4-by-1 and 4-by-2 and I will be a sophomore. Stoor: My name is Marcus Stoor. I did the shot put and discus and I'm a sophomore. Rice: My name is Kelby Rice and I did shot put. A senior. Geiser: My name is Kristin Geiser. I did high jump and I will be a senior. Walmsley: I'm Lilja Walmsley. I was a pole vaulter and I will be a senior. Utz: My name is Austyn Utz. I did triple jump and I'm going to be a junior. Brewer: My name is Keilana Brewer and I'm a pole vaulter and I am going to be a junior. Malan: I'm Lydia Malan and I did pole vault. Hart: I'm Jace Hart. I'm a senior and I did the 110 hurdles. Jensen: I'm Benjamin Jensen. I did the 1,600 and 4-by-8 and I was a senior. Walbuck: I'm Kellen Walbuck. I'm a senior and I did a long jump. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, June 17, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Steve Siddoway, Garrett White, Kurt Starman, Shawn Harper and Steve Taulbee. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts X John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is June 17th, 2025, at 4:30 in the afternoon. We will begin this City Council work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mayor, Members of the Council, it always impresses me we have so many high school students in our attendance, even more so during summer vacation, and so while we have some great proclamations to read they are currently on our agenda at the end, so, Council, Mr. Mayor, I move that we actually move those up on our agenda to after items after our Consent Agenda. So, we have that listed as proclamations -- a proclamation for Mountain View High School Girls State Track Champions Day and, then, following that Mountain View High School Boys State Track Champions Day and with that, Mr. Mayor, I move that we adopt the agenda as amended. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as amended. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted as amended. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 2 of 46 CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Vanguard Village Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0009) 4. Wadsworth Meridian Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 (ESMT- 2025-0034) 5. Ada County Highway District Facility at 2023 Franklin Rd. Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0055) 6. Western States Equipment Water Main Easement Release (ESMT- 2025-0057) 7. Frontline Subdivision Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0063) 8. Aviation Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0064) 9. Final Plat for Apex Phenomenal (FP-2025-0005), by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/2 mile east of S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. 10. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Centrepointe Apartments (H-2025-0009) by Mike Maffia, MGM Meridian 2, located at 3100 Centrepointe Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. 11. Temporary Right-of-Way Easement Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian at Apex Southeast Subdivision No. 3 (South Side of Discovery Park) 12. Development Agreement (Core & Main H-2024-0066) Between City of Meridian and Core & Main LP for Property Located at 299 S. Black Cat Rd. 13. Development Agreement (330 N. Linder Rd.) Between City of Meridian and Rinker Properties LLC for Property Located at 330 N. Linder Rd. 14. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $(11,600) to accept donation from Boise Area Pickleball Association Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 4 of 46 21. Mountain View High School Boys Track State Champions Day Simison: So as was noted we will move down to the podium for our proclamations. If I could have the coaches and the team join me at the podium that would be great and we can do them all men and women at the same time or we can do them separately. I will let you all decide how you want to approach that. That way everyone out there can see it real good. Whatever works. They are not going to like spread out themselves. They like to get comfortable, so -- all right. I -- I think we are -- we are getting everyone squared away officially. So, when these first came across my desk they were one proclamation to begin with, but I said no, no, no, no, we -- we got to separate these out. So, we are going to read two proclamations and, then, I will turn it over to the coaches for any comments and afterwards we will ask each member to come forward and just state their name and what year you are in school and what activities -- or what events you participate in through that process. But as a proud southside member wearing my -- my -- my kicks for the colors -- it's about as close as I could get to -- for -- for -- for Mountain View, but what -- what -- the fact that we get to have you all here today. So, with that we will first do the boys proclamation. Whereas being a Mountain View High School boys track team member is more than sprints, relays, hurdles, field events and achieving state titles, it is training to build leadership, character, confidence, teamwork and resilience, all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world and whereas the Mountain View Boys Track won the District 3 State championship with a score of 117 points and stole the show at the Idaho State 5A-6A championship meet with a one hundred point score that allowed the Mavericks to knock eight time defending state champion and whereas multiple student athletes achieve personal records and contribute to an unforgettable team victory to bring home the first boys track and field state title in program history for Mountain View and whereas the leadership, training and discipline of their coaches helped all team members to focus their talents and passion, become a winning team, with each player making valuable contributions to their victory. Therefore, I'm, Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim June 17th, 2025, as Mountain View's High School Boys Track State Champions Day in the City of Meridian and call upon the community to join me in congratulating the Mountain View Mays on their remarkable athletic achievement and for representing Meridian so proudly in the state tournament, dated this 17th day of June 2025. So, let's give a round of applause for them. And now we will do the one for the ladies. Whereas being a Mountain View High School Girls Track Team member is more than sprints, relays, hurdles, field events and achieving state titles, it is training to build leadership, character, confidence, teamwork and resilience, all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world and whereas the Mountain View Girls Track and Field Team won the 6A meet with an impressive 93 points, making a statement that the Mavericks are the team to beat and whereas multiple student athletes achieved personal records and contribute to an unforgettable team victory to bring the first girls state title for The Mavericks since 2018 and whereas the leadership, training and discipline of their coaches helped all team members to focus their talents and passion, become a winning team with each player making valuable contributions to their victory. Therefore, 1, Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim June 17th, 2025, as Mountain View High School Girls Track State Champions Day in the City of Meridian and call Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 6 of 46 Van Dahlen: My name is Koda Van Dahlen. I did the mile, two mile and 4-by-8 and will be a junior. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 22. Community Center Design Update Simison: All right. With that we will move on to Community Center design update. Invite Mr. Siddoway up. Siddoway: Thank you, Mayor, Members of Council. I'm not sure I can top that, but I will -- I will try. I shouldn't try. That was pretty cool. I just wanted to offer a few remarks before I turn the time over to Garrett for the -- the actual formal presentation. But we thought it would be helpful to come tonight ahead of the budget discussion next week to give a design update, a project status update, so that we don't have to spend a lot of time answering design questions and product status questions when what we want to do is focus on the budget next week. You will probably find that not a lot has changed in terms of the big picture; right? It's still -- the site plan looks very much the same. It's still the same uses, the same uses in the building, but we have been heavily focused with the architects on the details within that building, shifting walls a little bit to get the -- the sizes right. Making sure the IT room is the right size and shifting the wall between that and the storage and just on and on, different decisions that we have been trying to do to -- with -- with the construction manager and also involved to help us find ways to simplify some of the design elements, cut costs, stay within budget. We had a great meeting today. I will just say with the architect Team Fire and IT were also there. The progress on the plans is moving along really well. Things are on schedule, on track to be ready to -- to bid this fall, which has been our timeline and Garrett will go over the details of that timeline. But I was pleased to see that there -- there really has been forward thinking, planning ahead. One -- just one simple example. They know that we asked for and -- and to -- to -- we were saving space for a potential future gym expansion. Well, not only did they do that, but they have already sized the drain fields under the parking lot to be able to handle the additional drainage that would come from that expansion if and when it happens, so we don't have to tear up the parking lot and we can minimize disruption to the site when things -- and if things expand in the future. So, it's great to see some of that forethought. We have also spent a lot of time on access control and to make sure that we have ways to use the building with contracted instructors when the building is unsupervised and so, you know, finally, staffing, which isn't a big part of the design, but I know it's a big deal to Council and we have talked about it before, but I just want to reiterate, because I know it's -- it's a big deal that we have planned for a way to open this building by using just a couple of internal promotions, so that we can grow into the facility over time as the budget allows. But with that I'm excited about the -- the -- the -- this project and its future and what it can mean for the community and with that I will turn it over to Garrett, who is our project manager. Thanks. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 6 of 46 Van Dahlen: My name is Koda Van Dahlen. I did the mile, two mile and 4-by-8 and will be a junior. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 22. Community Center Design Update Simison: All right. With that we will move on to Community Center design update. Invite Mr. Siddoway up. Siddoway: Thank you, Mayor, Members of Council. I'm not sure I can top that, but I will -- I will try. I shouldn't try. That was pretty cool. I just wanted to offer a few remarks before I turn the time over to Garrett for the -- the actual formal presentation. But we thought it would be helpful to come tonight ahead of the budget discussion next week to give a design update, a project status update, so that we don't have to spend a lot of time answering design questions and product status questions when what we want to do is focus on the budget next week. You will probably find that not a lot has changed in terms of the big picture; right? It's still -- the site plan looks very much the same. It's still the same uses, the same uses in the building, but we have been heavily focused with the architects on the details within that building, shifting walls a little bit to get the -- the sizes right. Making sure the IT room is the right size and shifting the wall between that and the storage and just on and on, different decisions that we have been trying to do to -- with -- with the construction manager and also involved to help us find ways to simplify some of the design elements, cut costs, stay within budget. We had a great meeting today. I will just say with the architect Team Fire and IT were also there. The progress on the plans is moving along really well. Things are on schedule, on track to be ready to -- to bid this fall, which has been our timeline and Garrett will go over the details of that timeline. But I was pleased to see that there -- there really has been forward thinking, planning ahead. One -- just one simple example. They know that we asked for and -- and to -- to -- we were saving space for a potential future gym expansion. Well, not only did they do that, but they have already sized the drain fields under the parking lot to be able to handle the additional drainage that would come from that expansion if and when it happens, so we don't have to tear up the parking lot and we can minimize disruption to the site when things -- and if things expand in the future. So, it's great to see some of that forethought. We have also spent a lot of time on access control and to make sure that we have ways to use the building with contracted instructors when the building is unsupervised and so, you know, finally, staffing, which isn't a big part of the design, but I know it's a big deal to Council and we have talked about it before, but I just want to reiterate, because I know it's -- it's a big deal that we have planned for a way to open this building by using just a couple of internal promotions, so that we can grow into the facility over time as the budget allows. But with that I'm excited about the -- the -- the -- this project and its future and what it can mean for the community and with that I will turn it over to Garrett, who is our project manager. Thanks. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 7 of 46 White: All right. Thank you, Steve. Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, thanks for having me tonight. Chris, you have loaded that up, ready to go? Awesome. Thank you. So, I want to start off just by talking about the proposed timeline. Like Steve said, we started last summer, fall of 2024 with the schematic design and kind of worked our way through. Had some public outreach meetings, those types of things, and I kind of highlighted where we are at right now, which is City Council check in the spring and summer of 2025. In doing that, like Steve said, we are going through the design development stages with a higher level of detail. Everything for, like Steve said, working with IT, going over where we want, you know, badge readers to be on certain doors and lighting in certain classrooms and those types of items. Flooring in each classroom and each program and each flex space and those types of things. So, we are really kind of getting into that and, like Steve said, today we had a pretty good meeting with our architect team and our internal team on that and kind of deciding what we really wanted to go with here on out. Through this presentation I will show you some elevations. I will show you some different floor plan stuff that we went through and, like Steve said, not much has really changed the floor plan, but I will kind of discuss kind of what we want to do in each room and why we are doing certain things from ceiling heights to, like I said, outdoor expansion, those types of things. Right here is the access control stuff that I got from IT. You can see all those different colored dots there mean something different, whether it be a badge reader, to cameras, to wall data drops, to phone access, to where we are going to put our computers -- all that kind of stuff, because the access control portion is very important to us, the fact of -- like Steve mentioned we are only going to -- we are going to try to open this facility with only using two internal promotions, as well as existing staff to go over and staff it Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 5:00. In the evenings we still would be using it with our instructors like we do our current basics and our current Community Center and the fact of instructors will have badges to either a code to get in, those types of things and they can have access control through that, as well as security cameras throughout the whole facility. So, I'm just going to want to touch base on that and kind of show you all the details that went through there. This is - - I will show you a better floor plan here in a second without as many lines, but this is -- just shows all the detail. This -- this is a pretty quick slide that I'm going to go over. The red line there is the fiber. So, we have fiber now. We are getting ready to put fiber in through our park and we are going to stub it up to the -- right there close to the ball fields, so that we will be able to access fiber right there for a little disruption as we do through construction, but that's just kind of our fiber line and you can kind of see it goes straight to the building and, then, it shoots over to the dog park, restrooms, in that and the fact that we want security cameras and stuff like that over there as well with access locks and things. So, want to make sure fiber got over in that area. Building elevations. So, the top one there is from the west. That's if you are looking at Venable, looking at the front end of the facility. You can see that we have different elevations there. You can see the gym in the background and it's not just a big plain wall there, it literally has some character to it instead of different colors. Variations to it. The little colorful -- I will say art piece there in front is really just an alternate -- and I will touch base in the art piece a little bit later, but that is really just a placeholder for public art with that and we will be working with Stephanie Inman and Cassandra on that as well. The north elevation is basically if you are looking from Cedar Springs toward -- towards the facility. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 8 of 46 You see the -- the gym wall there and that looks like the fire outreach area there as well, kind of towards the right of that. The bottom one is from the east. If you are looking from the ball fields to the Community Center, again, on the back portion of that you will see that colorful piece. Again that's another piece for public art or for future public art for that and kind of see the landscaping there or the -- the building design there. The bottom piece, obviously, is looking now from the south or where the dog park is on the -- on the site plan you can kind of see that the areas there and, again, some more of the design of the building and what it is going to look like. Here is the overall site plan that we tentatively have and you will see that it has a lot of parking. I will be meeting with MYB here on Sunday is their next board meeting to kind of try to finalize an agreement with them to help pay for that parking lot and the two parking lots there towards the ball fields. The big thing that we heard -- we did the public outreach, as you guys know, we talked about before was they really want to know about parking -- parking -- parking -- parking. So, we are working with them -- MYB -- on that to get that completed. The whole site plan has about 347 spaces. The big thing we really want to do here is make it convenient for people that are using the ball fields to be able to park there; right? Because right now they are parking in Cedar Springs because it's convenient. So, try to make it as convenient as possible also by giving our park staff access through that parking lot as well to the main shop area that they have up there. Over on the dog park side we have kind of did some value engineering on that and kind of shrinking the -- the concrete area and making the -- the shelters a little bit smaller here and there to kind of match where the restrooms are and -- and just kind of making that fit a little bit better for the small dog park and large dog park and those will be planned to be very similar to what we do over at Storey Park where you kind of go from the concrete to gravel and to turf and those types of things, so that you can close certain areas during the winter when it's snow, but keep also some of the areas open. On the building itself you can kind of see we did some -- some different design in the concrete in the back patio and as you move over to the -- the north I will say or to the left kind of back around the building where the backside of the gym would be, we needed some fire ladder truck access there and in doing that you have to put a bigger concrete slab around there and we originally wanted to be on the -- the north side of where that kind of turnout is by the sally port on the -- the left side of this picture or the left side of the building there, if that makes any sense. Instead we moved it to the back and we put two half-court basketball courts in. One of the big things that I have done -- that I have heard in the last 15 years of being here is why isn't there any basketball courts at Settlers? We have everything out there, but there is no basketball courts. So, one thing we wanted to do is put some basketball courts out there, too. And in doing that it allowed us to kind of keep the same design on that north side or the left side of the building right there for the sally port for the fire to be able to pull in and pull out there. So, we put two half-court basketball courts back there and the reason why it's two half courts and not one full court is if you put the two poles in a different location fire can't use it now, because there is poles in the way. So, we made it two half court poles there, so -- and, then, you can see the dark area there is where the fire outreach facility is going to be. On the left side on the open space area that's about as big as a soccer field just for reference and what we kind of did there was kind of put a berm kind of towards the bottom there or towards Venable so to try to block something, you know, not necessarily a big -- a fence or Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 9 of 46 anything, but more of a berm to where it will stop soccer balls from rolling too far, those types of things, to try to do that along with the pathway to provide some buffer between the -- the homes there in Cedar Springs and the ball field there or the open field space. So, those are the types of things we have been doing regarding the -- the site plan itself. One thing we are kind of really liking right now is the -- the play structure. Since the last time you guys have seen this we have shrunk the play structure to make it kind of a more unique play structure area and you can kind of see the picture of kind of design right now of what that will look like. I showed that picture to my youngest daughter who is 11, she is like that looks pretty cool, you know, so kind of getting some value play out of that. But it looks -- it looks pretty cool, so we are excited about that as we move forward through the -- through the design. One of the things, too, is we wanted connectivity. Again, so, the pathways kind of -- connectivity all the way through it, but one, again, kind of going back to the parking lot and convenience, so we wanted some connectivity from -- also the north parking lot up by their shop. We have pathways going into the park to connect to existing ball fields and, then, one over here on the south parking lot also connects over there between a couple of the ball fields there as well. So, we wanted, again, three different connectivity points from those parking lots to the ball fields, again, for convenience for people to park. Next -- next slide is really the floor plan and as I go through this I will probably just kind of work from the right over to the left. So, on the top right of the -- the building right here is our yoga room or kind of a smaller fitness room. That room's going to be more soundproof, for lack of better words there, and so it's harder to -- if you are having yoga you want it quiet, because in the room right next to it is the exercise room where you are going to have the Jazzercise classes and those types of things. So, we are very cognitive of the fact that we want sound not to travel very far between rooms. Just across the hall from those two rooms you will have a cooking -- kind of a cooking kitchen classroom that we could have there and that has all the tables and stuff there in the bottom right of the -- the picture here. We kind of set it up to where you have a big island -- cooking island right there for -- where you can teach from and those types of things, but we also have it where there is a curtain kind of comes across there to where you can use as a dual purpose into another classroom itself if need be and just turn the tables around however you want them into another classroom area. But it gives us that flexibility for cooking classes or regular classes during that time. Kind of moving there on that same side of the hallway. You have the arts and crafts room that kind of leads into a kiln room. We plan on having two or three kilns in there for just different pottery classes and arts -- arts and craft stuff, working -- working in there. A lot of storage as well. And the restrooms. And kind of getting back to the access control, like I mentioned before -- I don't know if my mouse can see where I'm showing here. Kind of. Right here where my mouse is, that's one of the access control doors. So, we can split that wing off of the Community Center if need be, like I explained a couple months ago, to where one side will be kind of the education wing to where instructors will be able to get in that far south door and be able to get in there and access their classrooms however they want. The middle section where the office is and lobby stuff are it's going to be able to be shut and blocked off, so people can access that area and, then, as I move more to the left we, obviously, have mechanical, office, some storage areas and stuff like that into the lobby area and, then, on the right you can kind of see my mouse here. Here is the other access control door Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 10 of 46 to kind of separate that wing from the rest of the building as well. So, on that side we obviously have a big flex space that has the ability to have pickleball, basketball, volleyball. We have a stage on the end of it, so you can have some kind of a smaller special event when it comes to Treasure Valley Children's Theater or Huckleberry Theater or those types of accesses to that as well when it comes to the stage and storage areas there. So, the idea is to have that available and when I have talked to like the Treasure Valley Children's Theater and those types of groups they were like love the space, love to have the ability to actually use a space like that, have it accessible to us. We appreciate the -- the flexibility that you are having with this flex space. Talked to them about stage size. This is about what they need and what they want. Kind of on the smaller side, but they said we would love to use whatever we can. So, they were appreciative of that size of a space as well. They said it's more about the width than is the depth, but this right here, just for reference, you are looking at about a 24 foot width of the stage and about 20 feet deep and maybe a little bit -- a little bit bigger. So, that worked very well for them. On the other side of the gym space from the hallway is another classroom. We wanted to put a classroom over there in case in the future we wanted to have a summer day camp or whatever. We could have a day camp there where they have access to the gym and classroom as well. But it's just a standard multi-use classroom. And, then, you have the fire and outreach area on that other side. So, that's kind of the floor plan. Not much has changed, like I said, since the last time I talked to you, but I kind of wanted to talk to you about kind of how it is and what we are designing in through there. We have talked about cabinets, storage, cabinet size, ADA sinks, restrooms -- how we want everything and where it should go for that. So, getting a lot of the detail. The next slide I have here is just potential art locations. Like I kind of mentioned before, we worked with Stephanie Inman, as well as Cassandra Schiffler, our arts and culture coordinator to kind of look at future areas for public art. We kind of took that in front of the arts commission and said, hey, what -- where would you guys prioritize these things and this and that and this is kind of the list that they came up with. That welcome entry piece is kind of that front color picture I told you guys about when you first walk in. Could be any kind of thing. The lobby installation -- and this picture here to the right kind of shows a history wall. As you walk in the front door this is the lobby you will be looking into and that's just kind of a mock up. It's not Meridian's history, but it's similar to what we could see there if it came to the history side of that thing and what we really wanted to do is have this public art kind of tie into the theming of Settlers -- the Settlers Park and Settlers. So, there is past and the history here. And, then, we have just different hallway interchangeable displays and those types of things. Some of the things we are looking at doing, too, is just wayfinding. When it comes to like, well, if I rent the gym at night -- you can obviously see the big gym at where you should go, right, but if you are not sure where the classroom is, the gym side could be the blue side and the yellow side on the -- the right side where the classroom. So, we are looking at different wayfinding signage and stuff as well when it comes to the future public art and how we can tie that stuff in. So, with that I will stand for questions and feedback. Simison: Thank you, Garrett. Council, questions, comments? Donations? Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 11 of 46 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Garrett, I want to make sure I'm tracked with this -- really questions about just the design for today. Other questions about the Community Center as part of our budget process. Is that what you are looking for? White: Sure. I mean I -- I have some answers for you. I'm sure if you want to know some before budget I can try to answer some of those, but -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor, maybe just one. So, to make sure I'm tracking. You and Steve did a great job meeting with Council all before the end of the year and talking about what an operational plan would look like for this facility. So, I just want to make sure I'm hearing. You are anticipating, then, roughly about 300,000 dollars in increased cost to be able to operate this facility moving forward, plus as -- as staffing needs grow has that -- has that number changed? White: I think we have been talking about like a full subsidy when it comes to staffing and expected revenues and stuff. That being about 150,000, roughly, a year. After revenues and everything bring it in. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I want to make sure I have this right. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Only 150,000 dollars in an increased cost, meaning what we are paying now, we open this facility it's going to cost us 150,000 dollars more to operate it. That's not operating it. White: That's the projection, yes. Cavener: Okay. White: Yeah. So, when I -- I just put the slide up here. I thought I might get a question like this and I wanted to be somewhat prepared for it. So, staffing like Steven had mentioned before we are trying to do it with two promotions and moving existing staff over. So, that exists staff in today's dollars is about 101 ,000 dollars with a promotion between those two. As you kind of go down, the total O&M we are looking at about 44,000 and some change and so on as we go down that list. A lot of those are still kind of -- they are -- they are good estimates based on what we have at Homecourt and other city facilities. The electrical, gas, janitorial, those are kind of still, again, good educated guesses based on what we have at Homecourt and those types of things. The janitorial portion of it -- it really depends on are we cleaning it three days a week, seven days a week, four days a week. I do know that we are looking at other revenue sources as well that we haven't necessarily looked into yet and -- for this facility, but Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 12 of 46 those revenue sources are a beverage contract potentially in the future or advertisements in the facility on the scoreboards in the gym or those types of things we haven't looked at. Those are drops in the bucket at the end of the day, but everything adds up. Like you said, every dollar matters. So, we are looking at all of that stuff. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Garrett, thanks. This is -- this is a better number than I anticipated seeing. So, I -- I appreciate that. And, then, just because you -- you had touched on some of the amenities that are going to be installed within the facility. Kitchen equipment. Kilns. So, as I understand right now if I'm a -- if I'm a -- if I'm teaching a community class I say the class costs 50 dollars. We say, okay, it's 50 dollars, then, plus an administrative fee. Do we anticipate evolving our fee structure because there is a different cost to the city to purchase a kiln and operate that versus gym space for a Zumba course or a -- you know, a volleyball clinic, etcetera. So, how is the department planning to handle that? Because there are added cost to the taxpayer to purchase these items and want to make sure that when you guys are taking into your fee recovery that we are taking those into account as well. So, I assume you have already contemplated that and have a -- a good explanation for me, so I can have some good confidence. White: Mr. Mayor -- yeah, Councilman Cavener. Yeah. We -- we can look at all of our programs when it comes to a cost recovery philosophy and all of our cost recovery items. Right now if we were to have an art class we don't hire an instructor as a city employee, we contract them out as you -- as you know. The current split is a 70/30 split that we have there. The instructor gets 70 percent. We get 30 percent. So, if we need to sit down and -- and really look at those numbers say, okay, if it's going to cost us X, Y and Z to have these kilns, you know, do we -- do we look at a 60/40 split? I know it depends on what others are doing to make sure we are covering our cost, but we do want to cover our cost the best that we can, yes. Cavener: And, Mr. Mayor, if I can. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Garrett, I think that's important. I think that the cost I look at it that is the split is to cover with a -- you know, a city facility; right? It's a facility and an administrative charge. This is an amenity that we are -- we are specifically purchasing for those vendors and so I do look at the cost is different and it would be really important to me that any fees that we put together for these programs contemplate that as well. White: That's good feedback. Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 13 of 46 Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just to confirm. Outside of the operating cost still planning to pay for the construction of this facility with impact fees? White: Mr. Mayor. Yes, that is absolutely correct. Strader: Okay. And, then, help me understand what -- I'm not advocating for this at this point, but what would a delay cause at this point? If we get through our budget and even though it -- listen, an incremental operating cost of 150,000 dollars relative to our budget is not hugely material. Like I'm shocked and very amazed at what the team has managed to put together in terms of a very marginal increase in our operating costs using all of our existing staffing, but I just want to understand it. It doesn't have to be in this meeting, but when we get to budget time I want to understand the push and pull of what a delay of a year would mean for this facility. Yeah. White: Great -- great question. Mr. Mayor. Councilman Strader, so talking to a construction manager, considering all the things that are going on in the valley right now construction wise, they estimate between five and ten percent a year in inflated cost. So, our budget request right now is 19.7 million dollars and do the math, whatever -- if it's five percent, it is what it is. So, it could be anywhere from a million to two million dollars each year in inflated costs. Strader: Thank you. That's helpful. If you -- Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: If you wouldn't mind -- if you have more precision around that by the time we get to budget time I think it would be helpful for sure. And, then, just to kind of come back to the design and the concept. So, this operating budget assumes -- if you could just run through it with me again. This is Monday through Friday, 8.00 to 5.00. So, this wouldn't be full service to the level that we would want to get to eventually on weekends and stuff like that; right? White: Mr. Mayor. Correct. Yeah. So, what this does is our staffing model right now would be Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 5:00, like you had said. Access control in the evenings, like our Bay 6, Bay 5 in the current Community Center are -- we could run into a youth basketball group or adult basketball, whatever it may be, and we would set it up, could get a badge, they could access the gym at 8.00 o'clock at night if need be. However we wanted to do it to where we can make sure that there is still access control to where we can still use the facility into the night, into the evening, so -- Strader: Mr. Mayor, one more. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 14 of 46 Strader: While you are exploring other potential sources of revenue to help offset the operating costs, I was curious if you all have considered rental revenue as, you know, renting the facility out to groups and so forth, if that's been a part of what you are exploring. White: Mr. Mayor. Yeah, Councilman -- Council Woman Strader, yeah, absolutely. We are open to all that revenue source at this point. Because we really don't have a rental room what we would do is, again, look at different rental rates around, the comparables, and come back with you guys through our fee schedule and do fees and stuff like that. And, then, if the classes aren't being used with a youth class or whatever it may be or adult class, then, absolutely, if somebody wanted to use it for an HOA meeting or whatever it may be. Absolutely we would be able to try to rent something. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: I think Steve wants to continue to answer. Siddoway: Mr. Mayor, yeah. I was going to add to that just briefly. We were originally anticipating a much bigger rental structure and being a kind of an event center and trying to host weddings and things like that. We brought that to Council three, four years ago and were told don't do that. So, we have -- we have certainly pared back on the idea of what it might be rented for. We got rid of the catering kitchen, warming area. We got rid of some of the things from the earlier concept based on previous Council feedback. That said, this thing is flexible to be able to be rented in different ways as the council may see appropriate in the future. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. My feedback so far -- I -- I love the design. I -- I feel like it -- that aspect is on the right track. I -- I have always been a proponent of this, but the only question I have been continuously asking myself is what is the right timing. So, that -- that's my feedback so far. I think we need to get into our budget discussions and really dig into those, because there, obviously, is a much broader context for this. White: Thank you. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Garrett, thank you. Great presentation. Like what I'm seeing so far. Just one pretty simple question. It's related to Meridian Youth Baseball and for the parking arrangement. I know you are going to be meeting with them and working on it. My question I guess is -- is it our understanding or their understanding if they are going to Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 15 of 46 help to pay for some of the parking that will be provided, is there -- is that parking in the back going to say reserved for Meridian Youth Baseball parking? Is it just going to be open for all? I just kind of want to know what the expectation or understanding is at this point. White: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Taylor, yeah, it will be open first come first serve all the way around through the whole parking out there as well. Nothing's going to be specifically reserved for them, because we want it to be public use, not just for Meridian Youth baseball. Part of the agreement is to show that those fields can be used by the public and not just MYB. We want to make sure that there is -- I mean the city is using those fields for our wooden bat senior league. Now we are using it -- I want to designate times and show different times, so where it's not just Meridian Youth Baseball using it, it is a -- it is a park. It is on city property. The city puts a lot of money to that. So, we want the public to be able to use it. So, to have it designated times or designating for a parking lot is right now it's just open. That's just a first time first serve type of thing. Very similar to the other parking lot. You know, to -- I mean that's -- that's existing over there off of Ustick that, you know, people use it for tennis and pickleball and other just park uses. We want the same for the whole parking lot. Yeah. Good question. Thank you. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Garrett, Steve, and -- and your whole team, just kind of a comment here. I appreciate all you have done keeping us up to speed on this project from the -- the moment the site was selected to where we are at today. I'm going to comment on something that I don't normally ever comment on and that's the arts. I like what you just said with Stephanie and Cassandra working on the art. I mean we are sitting in the middle of Dairy Day's week, our 96th year since 1929 celebrating our history and the fact that we are looking at art it helps to celebrate the past and where the city came from couldn't make me happier. I don't get into a lot of the flowers and other type of art all the time, but that type of art I can really relate to and I appreciate you looking at that for the building. Thank you. White: Thank you. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Garrett, thanks. I know this was a back pocket slide in case a question came up on operational cost, but there is a note it says Settlers Park expansion will have similar O&M costs. Can you explain that line? Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 16 of 46 White: Yeah. So, I -- I'm focused more on the Community Center itself and -- and what it's going to cost. The park expansion itself also comes with a little bit of operation and maintenance cost as well. We can get more into that in the budget stuff, but it does come -- and there is some one time costs up front that's closer to 50'ish thousand dollars one time cost and, then, after that it goes down to very similar to -- I -- I don't want to quote a number. I don't know if Mike wants to come up and quote a number on the park side or not, but if that's something we can get more into in the next week in the budget stuff, but there will be some more operating costs for the park itself as it would be -- Simison: All the -- all the normal -- I think next week we -- we can cover the more details, so you have the slides, which will showcase all that information, but just these are Community Center costs, not park operational costs. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: The word similar is what threw me off. I just -- just wanted to make sure it wasn't similar to the 150,000 annual operational cost -- Simison: It is. Whitlock: Okay. So, the expansion of the park itself will have about 150,000 in that -- White: Roughly, yes. Whitlock: -- so you didn't want to quote a number. White: Yes. Whitlock: Okay. Simison: Council, any additional questions, comments? Thank you, Garrett, very much. Love the look and feel on paper. White: Thank you, guys. Appreciate it. 23. Homecourt Fee Discussion Simison: Yeah. And you can probably just stick around for the next one. Okay. And the next item up is Homecourt fee discussion. Let's see if we can make up that 300,000 dollars to help pay for that operational cost. White: Chris, do you mind pulling up just -- do you have the -- just whatever is online. Thank you, Chris. Appreciate it. Sorry to put you on the spot there. So, Homecourt -- Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 17 of 46 so, as you guys all know that the users of Homecourt are all kinds of youth, adult, seniors, all the above when it comes to the noon ball, basketball. Pickleball is big in the morning. We have a bunch of community education classes over there. We have some basketball tournaments, volleyball tournaments, martial arts tournaments. It's a very well used facility. Just day passes, looking at the 2024 volumes, that's the last full year that we had. So, looking at those volumes we had almost 49,000 just day passes sold -- check-ins, which is the current day passes I will get into are two, three and four dollars, based on where you live and your age, but the memberships sold as well we are at about 3,400 -- a little over that that use that. Those are primarily noon ball and pickleball in the morning and, then, evening drop in play as well. So, that's kind of the -- just kind of want to go over the users and -- and who is using it. When it comes to fees, our fees were adopted back when we bought the facilities September 30th of 2016 and we adopted the fees that the YMCA currently had, because that's who we bought it from and a lot of the same users came over to use it, so we didn't want to have a -- any kind of a price change for them as we -- as the transfer came over and if you remember right we lived with them for about 18 months while they were building South Meridian Y. So, those fees, just in talking with some of the YMCA membership back then, those fees were already kind of established. So, I don't know when those actually were established, but we adopted them in '16. So, I don't know if they adopted them in '14 or '15 or not, but they are -- they are -- they are years back. So, in doing that we want to look at price increases and really what it is we want to try to keep up with the -- the subsidy and the cost recovery of the facility. The cost recovery is not where we want it to be. We want our cost recovery to increase and in doing that we are looking at so many different ways of -- of trying to increase that cost recovery philosophy there. But in doing this the fees are going to be the ones that really help us do that. So, our proposal really is to raise the fees in two different phases. Phase one would be to raise it from two and four to three, four and five and, then, have the membership increase with the same ratio that the break even point of seven is kind of what it is currently, so we wanted to be -- kind of match that. So, we would increase the membership to a 21 , 28 and 35 proposal. On top of that we also want to make sure that those that are -- are using the facility -- renting the facility to where the public can't necessarily use it, want to make sure they pay their fair share as well. The current rate right now is 45 dollars an hour after tax to reserve one basketball court for like a youth basketball practice or whatever it may be. Because the public can't use it we want to make sure that we -- they are paying their fair share, so our proposal to raise that to 65 dollars for practices and, then, if you are closing the whole facility and making sure the public can't use it for the whole facility for day drop-in passes, we want to raise that to an event fee of 75 dollars per court. That's our proposal in doing so. And, like I said, those fees -- the original fees have been in line for about ten to 15 -- or ten years now, so -- and phase two, which we would want to come back to you at phase two, to -- in the next summer to kind of explain those to you and see where we are at when it comes to cost recovery and stuff, but phase two the idea right now is to, then, raise it again another dollar for the day pass fees and, again, the memberships to keep that same ratio of seven with that. And we will again for phase two of the fee increase -- we would, again, review what our -- what our costs are when it comes to practice rentals, where we are at in our numbers and our volumes based on 2025 and 2026. Before I started talking about fees Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 18 of 46 here I probably should have said that, you know, right now today I'm really not looking for any action from you guys, I'm more looking for feedback, head nods, thumbs up and, really, what will happen is if we are all kind of good with the proposal we will post them and come back for a public hearing on this. So, this is more of me just giving you guys information on what our proposal would be. If you look at our current cost recovery, like I said, it's not where we want it to be. We want it to improve, we want it to grow. In FY- 23 our cost recovery was approximately 49 percent and those are actuals I got off our -- from our Finance Department. FY-24, same thing. It kind of went down, wages go up, costs go up. We went down to 45 percent and, then, in this year, in FY-25, we are projected to have a 38 percent. So, again, we want that to be higher. We need it to be higher. So, we are -- we are looking at different ways in doing that. I think fees are our first step, because they haven't really been raised in ten years. Again, these are projected numbers based on FY-24 volumes. So, keep that in mind when we are going through this. The one thing I did want to point out there -- and I kind of showed that -- you know, we had a decrease in revenues from FY-24 to FY-25 projected. The church moved out. They were providing some -- these payments and stuff like that for the Bay 6 area. So, that was a chunk of revenue decrease there. The FY-26 and FY-27 phase increases, those, again, are based on FY-24 numbers. Don't want to be held to those in particular, but this is FY-24 number stuff is the best data that we had to come up with those numbers. With that to lower our subsidy increased revenues, staff has talked about increasing day passes and memberships like -- like I just said. We have looked at our hourly operation and where we could potentially reduce times on our low volume times, do we really need to stay open if there is only a handful of people in there? Yes, we want the facility to be accessible to people to be using those things, so we are really monitoring that as well. Hourly court rates we want to increase like I mentioned. Community education classes. The more community education classes we have, whether they are in Bay 6 and in Bay 5, we want to make sure a portion of that goes to help pay for the Homecourt facility. So, we are working on doing that as we speak to try to transfer that over. A specific percentage needs to go and pay for that facility in that area. Operational costs, again, we are -- our janitorial costs are just going way high, because that building is, obviously, used quite a bit. So, one thing we did is we worked with Max Jensen and his team and the cleaning company and for the next budget year we will reduce that to 75,000. So, we are already in a good start where we lowered it about 60,000 dollars from the anticipated stuff. So, we are already working on that. Just this year we are saving 52,000 for the FY-26 and maybe more. Additional -- additional revenues, kind of like Council Woman Strader said before, we are looking at different ways to either bring in revenues, rent the facility for more events, those sorts of things during the summer when the low use times are. Sponsorship program. I know Councilman Taylor mentioned like way back when with sponsorship on ball fields and stuff like that, why can't we do that in the gym areas and gym spaces? So, we are looking into that as well to get more revenues coming in when it comes to the signage up on the scoreboard or signage below the scoreboard or in the facility somewhere. Not looking for a big billboard area, but just more of just strategically sponsored areas that we can bring in revenues there as well and, then, we are looking at a potential beverage contract with a different Coke company -- Coca-Cola company or some kind of a -- a drink company to where we can get exclusivity in Homecourt or maybe at Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 19 of 46 Settlers Park and working with Meridian Youth Baseball and those types of things for all of our concessions in our parks to where we can sell those certain things and some of those revenues can go to a Homecourt, to the pool, to the Community Center, those types of things in the future. So, we are looking at different ways of doing that to really try to lower the subsidy and increase our revenues at Homecourt. So, timing wise I would like to -- like I said, tonight I'm just really looking to get feedback from you guys. Do you like the -- the proposed fee increases? Do you -- do you want to comment, give us feedback on those? And, if so, you know, like I said, we would post those fees, come back to you guys in a few weeks, have a public hearing, let public weigh in on it. We would want the phase one fees, if were -- they were to be approved and done, we would want them to start in September -- September 1st, right around there. And the reason I say that is is that's right after we close the facility for the annual floor resurfacing. So, it's closed for two weeks and this year have the HVAC replacement project as well. So, in August. So, this also gives us -- so, right when those projects are done we open and new fees are established potentially. What it also does it gives our staff the next month, month and a half to be able to communicate with people -- different users of the facility, hey, these are coming, plan on them. Just let's us communicate that. And, then, like said before, phase two, if we were to look at phase two to try to increase our revenues and things like that for next year, which I'm sure we will, would come back to you guys next summer, similar to what I'm doing right now. Here is our proposal. Get feedback and, then, do the same public hearing process. So, with that I will -- I will stand for questions, feedback, head nods. If we are -- if we are good we will post the -- the phase one fees as proposed, like I said, and come back. But right now I'm just looking for feedback and for thoughts. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Thank you, Garrett. Council -- Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Little -- pretty simple question I think. Just in thinking how it had been, you know, nine years or so since we last -- well, since we adopted the fees and we hadn't raised them. Don't really need to get into why or why we didn't raise fees over that time, but I'm looking at having -- you know, we got two phases of raising the fees. Certainly in the future I would still anticipate needing to raise fees as costs go up. So, why not just - - why would you propose two phases right now instead of just saying here is what we would like to propose for this year and, then, come back a year from now and say here is what these -- the new fees would be, because there is kind of a -- I don't think you mean to imply, but it -- I read it and I kind of think, oh, we are going to do two -- two adjustments and, then, are we done for a little while? I'm just kind of wondering why you do not just focus on the fee increase for this year and, then, we can come back next year in phase two when you do it and consider what that fee structure would look like. White: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Taylor, I will try to answer that. So, really, what it came down to is we are -- we are, basically, almost going to -- phase two doubles our current fees. So, in doubling our current fees -- yes, they are small, two, three and four dollars and it does -- you know, if we were to go to -- the phase two fee goes to four and six. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 20 of 46 So, it basically, doubles or comes close to doubling that. To keep our same volumes. we didn't really want to just jump it up right now in the lower volume, so we are trying to be strategic about it in raising it and trying to keep our same volumes and just kind of grow that into it, if that makes any sense. That's really the -- the purpose behind it, but we are -- we are open to thoughts and ideas. Siddoway: Mayor, if I may. Part of it was that we -- we were -- we were starting with a goal of trying to get the cost recovery overall above that 65 percent. We wanted it -- we were trying to get it higher than that. We are trying to push it as close to full recovery as we can. But when we were looking at those -- those steps, jumping it from two, three, four to be four, five six, just seemed like too much for -- to propose for one. We said that -- our proposal is to -- to go to -- to that four, five -- the -- the second phase. I mean we are proposing that, but we would formally bring that back. But we -- the -- the idea is to bring it to you as a two-step process to get where we are going -- where we are trying to get to, if that makes sense. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I have a couple questions, but maybe starting with how many nonresident memberships do we sell approximately per year? Just kind of curious like rough numbers. Yeah. Thank you. White: It's right there. Kind of gives you a breakdown of them. Strader: Would you mind going -- Mr. Mayor, if you don't mind. If you wouldn't mind going back to the phase one and phase two -- yeah. Fee structure. My feeling with it generally is if we are keeping it at five dollars and below for all of our residents, I think that's a phenomenal value. I actually think it would be okay to go directly into phase two proposed fees if that's the objective you need to meet, as opposed to phasing this in, because our cost recovery got so far off track of what we need to be targeting that actually just think this level of complexity is not needed. I think we should consider just going directly into the phase two proposed fees. My sensitivity actually would be more around our residence fees. I care a lot more about that. I think the City of Meridian is subsidizing this so much that, if anything, I think the nonresident fees going above five dollars I'm okay with that. It's really for our residents that I just want to see those at five or below. I still think that's a phenomenal value. So, just to maybe feedback for me is I'm a little bit more flexible on the phase one, phase two. I think if we have gotten that far off track that we are subsidizing this this much, maybe it might make sense to go further actually than you are proposing. White: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 21 of 46 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Garrett, appreciate the update and I'm going to -- I'm going to correct you just a little bit, because you said something that I -- I don't think you meant to intend, which is that first thing you went and did is looked at increasing the cost of fees and I don't think that's accurate, I think actually you and the team first went and looked at reducing expenses and I -- I want to commend you for that. I think that it's always easy to say let's just raise the rates and continue on. You said no, no, let's -- let's see what we can be doing about the cost that we are spending. I want you to know how much I -- I appreciate that. My question is a little bit of -- to quote the great council member Dave Zaremba, maybe a sideways question. Do we at the city provide a discount to nonprofits, whether they reserve a ball field, a class, a lesson, anything like that? Do we delineate between for profit individuals and nonprofits? White: No. Cavener: Okay. I don't think it's an exercise for it now, but a more -- I apologize. You come and answer one question, I come -- I challenge you again. It's for us to look at over maybe the next year as we prepare for our -- our -- our fee schedule for next year, to look at what options and what the impact would be to our revenues if we offered a -- a different rate structure for nonprofits, recognizing like some of our larger scale renters -- I think of PAL, those are nonprofits, but I think being able to -- for us to at least consider something like that could be a difference maker. They are providing a valid service that meets a need in our community that we are not having to provide and if we can partner with them I think it's something that's at least worth exploring. So, appreciate your great work on this. I look forward to our -- and I think Council may be a discussion is do we want to post fees with the -- the phase two and, then, we can have a -- a -- a discussion at the public hearing about that and ultimately land on something. In light of hearing from a couple council members that may be the more prudent. Just because that's what we publish doesn't necessarily mean that's what we would approve. So, I appreciate the -- the good discussion. I appreciate bringing this presentation. White: And you are right, we -- we went through all of our -- our operating costs, tried to cut those before we raise fees, obviously. Cavener: Yeah. White: Thank you for correcting me on that. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Not to belabor the point too long, but I -- I considered it coming in tonight, but actually think I agree a little bit with what Council Woman Strader mentioned about we are, essentially, adopting phase two. We are -- we are saying we want to get to phase Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 22 of 46 two and I appreciate the -- the goal behind kind of phasing into it, but, really, what we want is phase two. I would rather just say that's what we are going to charge, because I don't -- I like the practice we have with our other fee structures we have in -- in the city where we propose it, we look at it, we hear it, we adopt it kind of an annual basis I would prefer to do that. I would prefer to say -- I mean, essentially, what we are looking at -- we want phase two to get to the goal of the cost recovery. I don't like sort of doing the phased approach, because I know we are trying to make up time for several years of not having made any adjustments. So, I -- I think I would probably if -- and I'm not sure where everyone else -- if they agree with that, but if that's what we are trying to get to, then, let's have a hearing on that. Let's propose that and let's discuss that. I think that's a more straightforward way of doing it. I know we are trying to make up for time. I don't like voting or approving a phased approach for a couple years -- if it was over a couple of months maybe that's different, but I would rather just say this year this is what we are going to look at for fees. Next year if we want to adjust those fees what would it look like. That would be my preference. White: Mr. Taylor, thank you. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor. Garrett, thank you so much for your presentation. I think even if we go with phase two it's still one of the best values available. Question for you. Do you have any pricing regarding like the larger basketball tournaments and things what they pay elsewhere? I'm thinking that 75 dollars per court is still the deal of the century, knowing how much parents and grandparents and spectators pay to come watch those kids play, especially if we fold in a discount for nonprofits, because we know we have got some pretty profitable teams -- White: Sure. Little Roberts: -- in this valley. White: Mr. Mayor, so -- yeah. So, what others, like comparable ones, like it's metal -- the metal facility over in Nampa, they are a BIG4 basketball court, indoor facility, very similar to Homecourt. Just a little bit different layout. They are all multi-purpose floorings. Ours are hardwood. Their charge an hour per court is almost 64 dollars an hour after tax. So, we are going to be right there. We think our facility with being hardwood floors, kind of a great place to play. We think it's worth the 75 dollars as well. That's what -- we propose that -- a portion of that and our practice fees would be basically right at the 65 dollars is what we are proposing after tax to get to the -- the same as there. The Treasure Valley Athletic Club is the same price as metal. So, they are all right at their -- right close to 64 dollars an hour for their courts and, again, they are a multi-purpose flooring as well and it only has three basketball courts inside. So, as a tournament director I used to run the sports leagues around here, I kind of -- you Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 23 of 46 want as many fields and courts or -- in one location as possible; right? So, having the four is really nice. So, we -- we agree. So, to answer your question, 64, 65 dollars is what they are charging per hour per court. Little Roberts: Thank you. I think we are the best value around. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Garrett, thank you for the presentation and we have spent a lot of time in your conference room and I can share with my colleagues that you have really left no stone unturned and you have looked at every option. So, we appreciate that. In some of those meetings Jake and others have offered some informal, unscientific polling data as we have talked to residents who come on a regular basis and have come for the last nine plus years on a regular basis and they have talked about the deal of the century -- White: Yeah. Whitlock: -- and the opportunity and -- and almost asked when are you going to raise the fees? So, it will -- we will wait and see how the public responds to it, but I think the feedback that you have received tonight is complimentary of the work that you have done and I think it also complements our residents and their desire to have a -- a top notch facility and -- and they are willing to pay for it. So, we will see what the public hearing says, but I -- I also support coming back with a phase two recommendation. White: Thank you. Mr. Mayor. Yeah. And when Jake and his staff has been talking about, hey, the fees are coming to -- to Councilman Whitlock's point, yeah, they -- they all expect an increase. They know -- they know it's due. Simison: Council, any additional questions, comments? Thank you, Garrett. And I do want to thank Councilman Cavener for helping push this conversation at the Homecourt. You know, a lot of conversations over a lot of different issues. We understand a lot of different paths for a lot of different purposes. Hopefully we will have a positive outcome overall. You know, we are talking about this cost recovery, but it is ultimately, you know, it's -- it's a system, you know. Here, Community Center, wherever they go are -- you know, gyms with the West Ada, you know, they all have a -- a value -- a use. Some we pay more for, some we pay different for. There is an average cost over all these things that we have to have us all pay for, you know, in order to be operational to -- to get both what we want, because it feels right, but also what we need, because it's necessary. So, look forward to that next phase of this conversation. Appreciate you and the team and all the -- all the hard work. White: Thank you guys very much. Appreciate it. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 24 of 46 24. Potential Ballot Question Concerning a Levy to Provide Funding for Firefighters, Police Officers, and a Prosecution Unit Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to Item 22. Well, I think -- I guess it's probably Item 24 now based on how we renumbered. But the -- the discussion regarding the potential ballot question concerning a levy to provide funding for firefighters, police officers, and a prosecution. Council, for those who were here last week, you know, there was information that was presented by legal and -- and Kurt is here. So, whether you were -- I know those who weren't here probably went back and watched it and they are up to speed and maybe it generated some questions or you definitely have people here ready for those questions, if there is generalized comments or questions of another nature. I like to think that I am all commented out after the State of the City to really articulate the -- the why, but I'm happy to go into further comments if Council would like to on any of those. So, I guess I will first turn to those that weren't here last week and see if there is any level setting information that you felt you would like to get since you weren't present to ask any questions of legal. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Always go first and acknowledge, despite my best efforts, I have not been able to watch your speech yet or last week's meeting. So, it is on -- Simison: You told me you upgraded to the expense of Wi-Fi. Cavener: And the expensive Wi-Fi did not -- well, I got about six seconds of the speech before it would shut down and so despite it being the expensive streaming option it did not actually stream the speech. So, just getting back into town, planning to get caught up on that this week. So, I -- I don't want to have the Council that was here and was present have to go through the same presentation. So, I will handle that piece on my own. But maybe what would help me -- and this may have been covered and at least my one question is what -- should the voters pass this levy what would be the process that the Council could take to, essentially, reduce that amount over time? Is it -- can it be done piecemeal? Does it have to be done all at once? What action is required from the voters, if any? Because I think that to me is a -- is a critical piece of what our plan would be to -- however long term that is, to remove the levy off the -- off the taxpayer. Simison: The very next year you could reduce it down. You have the authority to set the budget of whatever you want. If you want to reduce our budget this year by five million you have that power. So, no Council is beholden to make this stay forever as a budgetary number. Cavener: That was my one question for now. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Simison: Okay. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 25 of 46 Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Yeah. I did have a chance to watch your speech, hear your argument that you made. Also listen to last week's presentation and, Kurt, I learned quite a bit about it. So, I thought that was a great, succinct presentation. I appreciate it. I think -- I only had one kind of question and I didn't -- I don't think I remember hearing it come up and, Mayor, maybe you can answer it or Kurt. A question I have -- if we are going to increase the levy by about five million a year for these stated purposes, is that -- how do we ensure that that money -- that five million always goes towards public safety? Does it -- is it kind of earmarked for it? Is it something we just agree to do? I'm just trying to make sure I understand as we go forward with the budget is this amount always going to be dedicated towards the five million or is it kind of fungible, because it's General Fund? I guess I'm understanding -- wanting to understand the mechanisms of how that looks year after year after year, if this is -- we are looking at a permanent ongoing levy. I just want to have some clarity around that. That was really kind of the only clarification and question I had tonight is kind of structurally or mechanically how that works with the budget year after year. Simison: I think the answer goes back to the very -- it's almost exact same answer that I gave to Councilman Cavener. You know, in -- in the context it goes towards what we say it will go towards, but if it -- the following year you all decide, no, we don't want to provide our own prosecution, we would like to go back to the other way and -- and there is no guarantee that that -- and, then, that Council at that point in time said, well, let's reduce down our amount or they would say, no, we don't. So, Council ultimately has the final say about all the revenue in terms of what it is for long term. But assuming that it passes, then, you know, the things that you will see in the following budget would be the fully funding of those 13 police officers. It would have a prosecution team in the budget and it would have the increase in police sworn salaries. All I can do is tell you what will go in there. If you all want to go down and -- if it gets approved and passing a budget and, then, go reduce down the sworn police officer salaries at that time, that's on you, not on me, but ultimately it is Council's discretion at that point in time about what stays in what location over the period, but there is nothing we can do to I guess earmark it in that context, if for whatever reason something were to go way in the future that that money would not go away unless that council at that time said we no longer need that revenue. We no longer have that purpose. Make sense? Okay. Thumbs up from Finance, so -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I had asked last time and was just curious to hear a bit more from Mr. Nary about kind of what his game plan would be on the prosecution side, how he would Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 26 of 46 -- how he would staff that, what that would look like. Could be high level, but I just really wanted to get a sense of that component. Nary: Sure. Sure. Certainly. Council Member Strader, Members of the Council, Mr. Mayor, so go back a few months and the folks that are -- are interested can go back. We talked about a prosecution team at some point in the future. What do we currently have and what's being currently provided and how if we were going to move that to a permanent in-house service how would that look and what would that be. So, currently, we contract with the city of Boise. They basically have a prosecution unit and they staff currently approximately two prosecutors per courtroom. So, judges in this -- in this -- in this district -- judicial district are divided into the criminal court -- or the misdemeanor criminal court system and there is a number of courtrooms that are staffed on a daily basis. They have courtrooms for arraignments, for sentencing, for court trials, which are traffic tickets, infraction types of offenses, as well as jury trials for misdemeanor criminal offenses, such as DUI, domestic battery and those types of cases. You have pretrial. So, they have a number between five and six active courtrooms every single day that are staffed by currently two attorneys for the city of Boise per courtroom, based on the caseload volume. We are a little -- we are less than half of their total volume, but we are somewhere between 20 to 30 percent of their volume. So, we incorporate a portion of that cost of personnel that they have as what we contract for -- for both the in -- in- court personnel of prosecution, as well as the out-of-court personnel for administrative support to prepare discovery, you know, send all the information, evidence required by -- by code to be sent to defense attorneys and things like that. So, we pay for that portion of that cost. If we were absorbing that entire cost now we, then, have to staff the courtrooms that are active each day, so that would be five or six active courtrooms daily that need to be staffed by a personnel from the city and, then, of course -- so that's at least one person per courtroom on a daily basis, again, plus the out-of-court personnel to support that. So, we are looking at somewhere in the area of five, potentially six, depending on, you know, again, the court is always evolving. I spoke with a Boise city attorney last week and she told me that the court system -- the Fourth District Court is looking to ask the legislature to fund another magistrate in the next year or two, which would, then, expand the criminal system. So, again, having to be responsive to that. Now, our only real -- I wouldn't say pushback -- our only real response that we can help alleviate some of that impact is if the court would be willing to adjust their scheduling some to narrow maybe where the Meridian cases are and the number of courtrooms that we have to be in. Currently they don't do that, because they really only have two agencies that they are really satisfying Ada and the city of Boise. So we haven't explored that, but, obviously, it would be a conversation we would have between now and when this would take place to see if that's a possibility, but, otherwise, we would be looking at staffing, essentially, five or six courtrooms daily, as well as the necessary support staff. So, we have built some models with Finance on what would that look like and that's where the numbers have come from. The numbers that we have proposed in this levy are both the cost that we anticipate, in addition to the contractual costs that we would -- we would save by no longer contracting with an outside entity. So, when you take those two numbers together that is approximately what we estimate it could cost us, because if you remember when we had this conversation earlier one of the -- one of Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 27 of 46 the challenges with this type of endeavor is that you can't really slowly grow into it. Really, the way the court system is set up they have an expectation, courtrooms are set up, calendars are set, judges are set, they set up these calendars and they don't really -- aren't really designed to do a little at a time and go from one or two to three, then, five, then, six -- that really isn't the way the court system works. So, you really have to staff it at not quite full build out, but fairly close to it just to open the door. It just really is the only way that it can function. So, that's what we sort of built this team from the outset is what we take. Now, how we transition that and how we coordinate that with our current contracted entity of the city of Boise -- we have had a lot of conversations of what that would look like. So, we have some thoughts on that. But that's really what -- from the public's perspective that's what this prosecution would look like is essentially five to -- five prosecutors, essentially. We already have one position of the police attorney that you funded for this current fiscal year that would be part of this unit, but it's not a prosecutor. That's a separate position. So, that's one of the unit -- people in the unit, but the rest of it are all prosecutors and support staff and it's between five attorneys, approximately, and four to five support staff to support that. Strader: Thank you. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I -- I guess I would like to hear what -- what would it look like to move this process forward? Like what would the public process look like? If we could revisit that. I think we touched on that a little bit the last time, but I -- I think that would be helpful. And, then, I do have some comments. Simison: Well, from the public process, you know, what we have put out there is to have two meetings where the public's invited to come and provide feedback on this proposal and that would be, you know, next Tuesday, as well as July 8th or is that the 9th? July 8th or 9th. Whatever that Tuesday is -- off the top of my head. I don't have a calendar that I'm looking at. So, that -- that would be the general opportunity. It would be our desire on that second one that Council would say yes or no, that they would like to put this on the ballot for consideration. There is still an official process after that that would take care -- that would take place, but I think it would be good to have a general inclination that this is something that we are moving forward on or not going to move forward on at that point in time. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I would be happy to provide a comment on my -- at least my initial impressions of this. I think that from what I have heard so far from my constituents and I would like to hear more from them -- I hope they show up to these public hearings. Really to me public safety and that investment in our public safety is the foundation of a successful city and I -- what I like about this levy discussion so far is it really does center Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 28 of 46 our voters in the driver's seat and allows them to have a really strong voice in what they want to see in the city. So, for that reason alone I'm -- I'm supportive of this process. Very strongly supportive so far. I would love to hear from the public and hear what they have to say and hear their feedback. It really feels to me like we are -- and I think a lot of cities actually are just at an inflection point where they need to decide how important public safety is to them, specifically with the Police Department, you know, hearing your comments in the State of the City certainly one of the most difficult professions out there and I think it's great to allow our voters to have a voice on what they want PD's pay to be. I think that's really important. I think it's important for our voters to have a voice about maintaining our 13 firefighters that we got with our SAFER grant and -- and to hear from them on how important that is and, then, I do think with the prosecution services that's, obviously, a big change for us. That would be a big expansion of what we are doing. But what I like about that is our ability to chart our own course and really be in the driver's seat on -- on the other side of -- you know, after arrests are made. So, those are just my initial thoughts. I -- I want to listen. I want to get feedback from the public. I think that's really important. So, I'm in support of moving the process forward and hearing from the public. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I appreciate you kind of outlining what the -- the process would look like. One of the things I think our city does really really well is we listen to our bosses and providing ample opportunity to hear from them, both on their opinion on this proposal and, then, certainly if it's something that was out to the voters having that opportunity to weigh in. Last year when we were having some really heavy conversations about the budget I put together a postcard that I sent across my district saying, listen, I want to hear from you, what are your priorities? And it was police and it was fire and it was parks and it was public art, but I also included an option, because I thought this is what I would want to hear. This -- I thought this is what I would hear from my bosses, which is don't increase taxes at all and I was really surprised that the vast majority of the cards and the surveys that I got back said, no, we are willing to spend a little bit more for police. We are willing to spend a little bit more for fire. We love that we live in a safe community. And so to me that was eye opening. I didn't expect that. And it's a good reminder that we need to go into this process with -- with two ears and really hear from our -- our community. So, I'm looking forward to hearing from our residents, these two public hearings, and I think that their feedback is going to be really really critical for how we best move forward. I appreciate you, Mayor, kind of lining out that process, very clear, very transparent with lots of access and options for people to be able to participate. You know, summer sometimes is hard with vacations and I think giving people two bites of the apple, at least, is a good way for us to hear and certainly we can take testimony via text or via e-mail or calls into City Hall. So, making it super easy for our residents to let us know how they feel. Mr. Mayor, just -- I want to make sure that I am clear on this. Because this is Council acting legislatively, there is nothing that prevents us from any ex-parte communication and meeting with people, talking about Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 29 of 46 this. So, Council, if you want to meet with individuals or folks and get their opinion or people grab you in the supermarket -- want to grab you, also totally okay. Simison: All perfectly legal. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I know it won't surprise anybody up here, but I'm completely in support of this public safety levy for all three reasons stated. Our fire department, for our police and our prosecute -- prosecution attorneys. It's been years I have been hoping that we could get to the point that we could have our own attorneys prosecuting Meridian cases and prosecuting Meridian cases the way we want to see them prosecuted. We do things just a little different in the City of Meridian and when we talk to people, whether it's National Night Out or other events, one of the first things I always hear from residents is they like our quality of life. They like being able to walk in our parks. They like the feeling of being safe, whether it's in their schools, their neighborhoods or where they are shopping and that comes with a price tag and due to things that have been beyond our control we find ourselves in a position that we need to bring forward a public safety levy to try to continue to keep that high level of service in our law enforcement and our fire department and our prosecution services and it can't be understated when we talk about prosecution services that we can have a phenomenal police department, but if we don't have a system of attorneys that didn't take all those cases and follow them through all the way through that court process, then, we are not doing the job. So, if anybody is confused by how that all works it's -- it's -- it's part of the same operation. You can't have one without the other. So, I'm completely behind this. I don't take it lightly that it's an increase I wouldn't be supporting if I didn't think it was absolutely necessary for our community to try to keep the standards, the level, the professionalism we have in both departments. Trust me when I tell you if we lose people because we can't pay them what they are worth it costs us ten times as much to, then, hire new folks and spend years trying to train them up to the levels of service that it takes to match what we have got today. We got some of the best people in the country and we need to try to make sure we can keep them right where they are at. Thank you. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: I just want to speak to the process. I think -- I mean the state has boxed cities into a box and we -- we can't get out of that box on our own. We can't make decisions here outside of that box. But the state has also provided an avenue by which we can get out of that box and it involves our bosses. It involves the taxpayers. So, think the process is sound. I think it gives -- it gives us the ability to -- to state the issue, like you so eloquently did at your State of the City address, to -- to lay the issue on the table and let the voters have their say in this. So, that's the way out of this box that we Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 30 of 46 find ourselves in. So, I just -- I support the process. I also commend the staff, which has been through this with a fine tooth comb down to the penny and I appreciated the presentation last week and the opportunity to reflect on that over the -- the past week and I -- I, too, hope that the public will come out and share their views and their comments and we will take that very seriously as we consider a path forward on how we get out of the box that we find ourselves in. Simison: Thank you. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I can't state it anymore eloquently than my colleagues already have, but I do think -- I just can't stress enough the opportunity that our -- our bosses, our citizens get to basically say how this goes and there is nothing more important than having such a wonderful city that has grown extremely fast. We have not kept up with public safety and this is their opportunity to say this is what we want and I hear that time and time again -- I mean at my district south of the freeway is growing like mad and I hear time and time again our taxes are lower than we ever thought they would be when we moved here and that they don't have a problem contributing -- especially when they know it's -- I mean we have got a great city. They love the amenities. But they love knowing that it's going directly to public safety and the prosecution team. I always kind of add that, because it seems like when you are talking to people they have picked up on police and fire and, then, they have like -- I think they are not real sure what the prosecution involves and so they really focus on police and fire, because when they dial 9-1-1 and they are expecting police, fire, they want as quick as possible and that's what we will continue to be able to do is to keep those officers and -- there when they need them and that's I think the whole goal. But to have citizens be able to say that is crucial. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I'm going to speak to the process as well a little bit. I think one thing that's interesting is the ultimate -- whether this is successful or not is not actually going to come down to those of us up here, it's going to come down to if the voters vote to approve it. What we are being asked to weigh in on is do we want to bring the question to the voters. I think that's very unique. A lot of times legislators, policymakers are the ones whose vote makes the decision. That's not the case here. We are being asked to present the question to the voters. So, I do appreciate the transparency in the process. I like that we are going to have two public hearings. I like that we had a presentation. We have some follow-up tonight. I hope the biggest message that comes from out -- from tonight's meeting is a real robust invitation to the public. We really want to hear you, because the question we will be considering is do we put it on the ballot? And so I Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 31 of 46 would really -- I hope that our -- our citizens, the constituents we have, will come out, will let us know what they think. Very eager to hear what they have to say. These are weighty matters. It's significant. Not just to where we stand with the budget process, but to the long-term view of where we go as a city. So, very hopeful for that, that we get that feedback. But I do -- I think the -- the process is open and transparent. We see a lot of cities looking for ways to find revenue through different mitigation fees and other things that, frankly, I much more appreciate the idea of -- of posing the question and letting them weigh in. So, I think the process is good, but I would like to use this opportunity to really a robust invitation to our constituents to, please, come out, tell us what you think, give us the feedback because, again, we are not making a decision if it's passes or not, it's whether we are going to put the question to them. So, anyway, I appreciate that. Simison: And in a lot of ways -- you know, this local option tax it is -- at its core in -- in concept, you know. There is certain things I think that Council understands, their base responsibilities to do, but you don't always ask the public for every -- every decision that you make along the way. But in -- in this case there are definitely -- you know, we -- we could still continue to have our prosecution services handled. You know, that's a core that we are able to meet them. But if you -- if we want to do it the right -- the way we want to do it or -- we still could have three people on each engine, you know, moving forward and have all of our fire stations currently staffed. But if we want to have the best response force available -- and I think the chief, you know, highlighting that information -- Chief Butterfield to kind of showcase what you get for -- in results. You know, I think the -- the groundwork has been laid in a lot of ways for what the outcomes can be through this process and -- you know. So, while this is the process the legislature has outlined for us, I have always been a proponent of asking the voters where it makes sense to do things, especially, you know, when they just had that -- their wisdom to expand from four to six Council Members, you know, some -- sometimes, you know, we operate fine with four, but six just is that much better in that context and it's great input points in that context and if I misspoke earlier and I said 13 officers, I did mean firefighters in that context, just so we are clear about what we are -- what is going to be coming if this makes it onto the ballot. But I -- I -- I hear what all Council is saying, they want two hearings over the next three weeks to be the predominant, but I'm sure you will have plenty of conversations here and there and everywhere along the way as we consider this. We will get a press release out officially highlighting the -- the two weeks that we will be taking public comments on this topic, so that the community has it. It will go out in our immediate newsletter -- electronic newsletter. Unfortunately, we can't really put it out in our utility billing, because it just doesn't coincide with when things hit. So, that won't make it to the utility billing inserts, but what we reserved future engagement through that means if this does make it onto the ballot appropriately. So, we will take those steps and we will have a conversation next week on this topic. Thank you. Appreciate it. 25. Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements Concerning Countywide Development Impact Fees Discussion Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 32 of 46 Simison: So, with that we will move on to the Intergovernment and Joint Powers Agreement concerning countrywide development impact fees discussion. Ask Kurt to come on back up. Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. Kurt Starman with the City Attorney's Office. So, this is a topic that is well familiar to you at this point. We -- we had an in-depth presentation regarding the potential for countrywide development impact fees in December and, then, you had a conversation about two weeks ago as well. Back this evening for a couple reasons. One is to bring the topic to a head and to see how the Council would like to proceed or if you would like to proceed at all. But also there were some questions two weeks ago in particular relative to the coroner -- the proposed coroner development impact fees, so I want to provide a little bit of information about that this evening. I believe Leon Letson from the county is available remotely as well if there is some questions for him. So, I will do the best I can to articulate the county's thought process relative to the coroner fee and, then, really this is set up as an action item tonight. If you would like to take action you may. If you -- I will describe that a little bit later, but you can take action tonight or perhaps we can make some -- some last minute adjustments, in which case we can bring it back to you in a couple weeks on the Consent Agenda or whatever direction you might have for us. I'm going to ask -- oh, Chris is always ahead of me. Thank you, Chris. Appreciate it. So, with regards to the coroner fee, some discussion relative -- just maybe for context. The three fees that the county is proposing that would require the participation of all the incorporated cities include a fee for the jail, an impact fee associated with the EMS district and, then, a fee relative to the coroner's office and the services provided by that -- by that office. So, under the -- the statutory framework that we all operate in, which is known as the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, the purpose of that act is to fund public facilities and emphasize that particular term public facilities that are needed to serve growth and we have had discussions in the past about, you know, that philosophy of growth paying for growth. So, that's what this -- what the Impact Fee Act is about. And importantly for our discussion about the coroner's office in particular is that the term public facilities has a very precise definition within the statute and there are multiple categories. I'm not going to talk about all of them, because it's not relevant to our conversation tonight, but it is things like water or sewer or parks and things of that nature, but the one that -- the category or the portion of the definition for public facilities that's relevant to our discussion is the one that's in that last bullet point that defines public facilities as including, among other things, public safety facilities, comma, including law enforcement, fire stations and apparatus, emergency medical and rescue and streetlighting facilities. So, you will note that just on its surface it doesn't say anything about coroner -- coroner facilities or coroner functions, which leads you to kind of one of two ways to approach this. One is an argument that the coroner function falls under law enforcement and I think that's really the county's take on this. A different way to -- to possibly look at it is that -- to read the language in saying it includes public safety facilities and there are some examples provided in the statute, including law enforcement. I think that there is some risk in interpreting that way. I like the -- you know, better that the legislature include a specific subcategories were best. It's more prudent to stick within those particular subcategories. I think the county is really making Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 33 of 46 the argument that the coroner function does fall within law enforcement. In discussions with the county, you know, this goes -- stems back to last year prior to that December presentation, the county really -- when they articulate why they believe that to be the case and why a fee for the coroner's office would be defensible, they really point to two portions of the Idaho Code or sections of code that they -- that they think fits within that category. The first is Title 19, Chapter 43 of Idaho Code. That's the -- one of the main areas of Idaho law that talks about what the coroner does. It basically -- and so these all relate to law enforcement and, you know, arguably, they may or may not constitute law enforcement, but the forces -- you know, the coroner that -- just a summary -- high level summary of what Title 19, Chapter 43, talks about are the bullet points on your screen here right now. Is that the coroner is required to investigate certain deaths and it explicitly talks about homicides and it talks about suspicious deaths. So, that's part one. Part two is the coroner has quite a bit of authority in terms of conducting inquests and really performing almost judicial or quasi-judicial functions, including summoning jurors to serve for the inquest. Can issue subpoenas for witnesses to appear at the inquest. Can compel witnesses to attend -- to attend and testify at the inquest similar to what a magistrate or a district court judge would be able to do and if the jury finds that the person in question, the deceased, was killed by another, the coroner is compelled by law to actually -- and has the authority to issue an arrest warrant for that person that is suspected -- or that the jury in the inquest determined was responsible for the death. So, those all sort of have the -- the fill and flavor of law enforcement or at least maybe a judicial type fill and flavor. They don't speak -- they don't precisely fall in the definitions per se of law enforcement, certainly kind of have that -- kind of have some overlap there. The other section of law that the county has pointed to in past conversations of why they believe the coroner's function is encompassed when that -- within the definition of law enforcement, therefore, eligible for impact fees is Title 31, Chapter 43, which has some interesting provisions in terms of what happens if something happens to the sheriff and the first one is when the sheriff -- whether he or she declares a conflict of interest in the topic, this particular section of code basically authorizes the coroner to act as the substitute for the county sheriff and when he or she, meaning in the coroner, performs that role, the statute is clear that the coroner possesses all the same powers as the sheriff during that point in time. So, clearly that does, you know, bleed into the law enforcement category so to speak. The last section I will point to -- the county hasn't really mentioned this, but I will mention it, because it does -- it's similar to what we just talked about. But in this case the example I just gave you a moment ago is when the sheriff declares that he or she has a conflict of interest, then, the coroner steps in, this is similar, but this is where others determine that the sheriff has an issue and -- you know. And Idaho has an interesting provision. Basically the coroner is the only elected official or individual that can arrest the sheriff and so that's, essentially, what this language is about is if the sheriff is a party to an action -- this is an artful way to say it -- that if the sheriff was a party to an action or proceeding and, then, the process and orders that are related thereto fall to the coroner and that includes the potential for arresting a sheriff for unlawful activity. So, those are the sections. The first -- the first two I mentioned in particular are the sections that the county points to that as to why the coroner's function fits within law enforcement and because it fits within law enforcement it is one of the public facilities that can be paid for or category of public Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 34 of 46 facilities that can be paid for by impact fees. The long and short of it is this is -- this has never been litigated to the best of my knowledge. It's never been challenged. And so that we don't have a bright line rule. There is no good definition in the Impact Fee Act or elsewhere about what law enforcement means and so there is -- as you often hear from attorneys there is lots of gray area and the room for argument here. So, the county I think has -- you know, has made a fair argument as to why the coroner fee could fit within the Impact Fee Act. It's certainly not a black and white question or a black and white answer. There is risks. There is -- Mayor Simison spoke about a couple weeks ago. You know, really until you are challenged and the court makes a decision we don't know the definitive answer and that's sort of the circumstance we are dealing with. So, the three agreements you have before you tonight that you may or may not wish to act upon, the -- in this book the two agreements you have before you tonight. One is the agreement between the city and the EMS district and just to refresh memories and, then, for those that might be watching now or later, we talked about a four step process for the city to be a good partner with the county, along with other city -- incorporated cities in Ada county -- a four step type process is incremental and sort of, you know, the judicious way to proceed would be to enter into an agreement with the county that basically says not much more than we are going to make use of the county's impact advisory committee as our committee for this purpose and that we will commit to considering the possibility of adopting the CIPs for the coroner, for the EMS and for the jail. Step two if we proceeded would be actually to consider the CIPs that would come later. It would be part of a public hearing process and an actual amendment -- formal amendment to the city's Comprehensive Plan. Step three we would pause until other cities catch up and every -- because this takes all the cities to participate to make this work and so we would pause at that point until other cities have adopted the CIPs and adopted ordinances to implement such a fee and, then, step four for us at that point would be to consider the possibility you are not committed. This Council and future councils are not committed to do anything, but you would consider as part of step four the possibility of adopting an ordinance that would implement the countywide impact fees within Meridian. We are talking about step one only that includes two agreements. The first is with the EMS district. That stands by itself. There is no correlation or any connection to the coroner function and so that agreement really is not impacted by this -- the issue of the coroner's office and whether it should be included or not. The second agreement, however, also between the city and the county, does deal with both CIPs, one for the jail -- that's associated to jail and one that's associated with the coroner's office and so to the extent the City Council does not wish to entertain the idea of a fee for the coroner's office, you have a couple ways -- or you still have questions about that you know, you have a few ways to potentially approach that. I have listed three. You may have some other ideas here tonight as well. One is there is really -- even if you still have some concerns relative to the coroner's office, there is no real -- real impediment necessarily or downside to use that phrase of even -- of approving the agreement as it sits, because, really, all it obligates the city to do is to consider the CIP out of another date as part of a public hearing process. So, on the one hand you could even approve that agreement now, even though you may have some lingering questions relative to the coroner's office and it doesn't -- doesn't commit the city to do anything and you can have a more in-depth conversation about that topic when you actually consider the CIP. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 35 of 46 So, that is an alternative. Converse -- or as an alternative to that, if -- if you are convinced now that the coroner's office ought not be included and we don't -- we don't want to waste people's time and that's just the conclusion of the Council, yet you want to proceed with other aspects of the county's proposal, a different alternative would be number two listed there, which is we can direct staff to modify the agreement with the county to delete all references to the coroner's office and the coroner's CIP. We need a little time to make that happen. We bring it back to you in a couple weeks on the Consent Agenda, minus any references to the coroner fee and we proceed accordingly. And, lastly, you may decide that you don't have enough information yet about this topic or other topics to do any of those things and perhaps you need to hear from the county, you know, in more detail tonight or another -- another setting. So, those are a few potential alternatives. You may have some other thoughts as well on how to best proceed. As I mentioned I think -- if he -- if he was good enough to hang with us for the night he was -- Mr. Letson was on -- was going to join us remotely, so I'm happy to answer questions you might have. Hopefully Mr. Letson is available if you have questions for the county and, Mr. Mayor, I will turn it back to you. Simison: Thank you. Council, questions, comments? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: A comment and, then, I do have two questions. I -- I do think there is some harm in considering an agreement if we are not going to get there. Like I -- I don't want to lead on like partners in government to count on something that they think is coming from us if we are not going to get there. So, I -- I do think there is a risk in that. My -- my questions would be, number one, if we decided to move forward on the coroner CIP and we are wrong, what is the risk to the city. And, then, my second question would be can we just, you know, maybe get -- proactively ask the Attorney General or someone else to provide a legal opinion about this matter. Like is there a resource available to us that we could use to try to get to the bottom of the coroner piece specifically? Starman: Thank you. Mr. Mayor and Council Member Strader, excellent questions. So, with regard to -- let me start with the last question and I will work my way backwards. You might have to remind me to -- to the topics. I have given some thought to as -- well, I think the county is in the best position to do that. They choose. Those are two thoughts that are one of the two things you mentioned or thoughts that occurred to me as well. Potentially the county could ask the Attorney General's office for an opinion and the attorney's -- Attorney General may choose to do so. So, that's an option that the county could choose to pursue. Probably make sense for the county to do so, since they are proposing their fee on a countywide basis and we are one piece of that puzzle. The second potential alternative would be to go to the District Court now with the declaratory judgment action and ask the court basically to decide now, absent a disagreement, but as a matter of law, you know, does the coroner's -- does a coroner impact fee comply with the Impact Fee Act? So, under Idaho law, you know, parties, Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 36 of 46 including counties, can -- can seek a declaratory judgment that declares what the law is with respect to the rights under that law. So, those are a couple options that might be available to the county. With regard to -- I think this -- working backwards. Second question in terms of risk to the city, there is probably little -- little risk to the city in terms of considering the coroner CIP in the sense that it's a planning document that says, you know, that the community is growing in a certain way at a certain rate and it has -- generates demand for facilities. Here is what that looks like. Here is the analysis. And to the extent -- certainly no harm in considering such a CIP and even to the extent we adopt the CIP and included it as part of the Comprehensive Plan, that that really is just a planning document and doesn't have, you know, a force of fee ordinance or any ordinance behind. It is a planning instrument. So, I don't think it's risk to the city or significant risk to the city relative to the CIP. Where the risk comes in is if that last step is taken, which I referred to as step four, if the city adopts an ordinance and we start to -- under the force of law collect impact fees for -- from people that are developing in our community and a court that later decides that is illegal, then, that has lots of legal implications for the city and for the county. As we talked about briefly in some previous discussions, one of our requirements of the county is that we have an identification and hold harmless provision, but I don't want to -- you know, without getting into great detail about that -- there are some limitations to that under the Idaho Constitution and I don't want to, you know, completely rely upon that as a safe harbor for the city. So, we should proceed, you know, with our eyes wide open to the extent -- particularly to the extent we actually get to the point of considering implementing a coroner related fee that might be challenged. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Kurt, can you go back to -- it might have been your first slide that was referencing the section of code -- back a little further. Right there. Public safety facilities. In your research was that term defined in the law? Because it would seem that a coroner facility could fall under either law enforcement or is it a public safety facility? Did you look at that or examine that at all? Starman: And so -- thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council Member Taylor. So, there is no case -- no case law on this, so -- or at the appellate level. I'm not aware even at the District Court level, but no appellate cases, so -- and the legislative history is not particularly helpful. The legislature clearly went to great lengths to narrow what these fees could be applied to and we had this discussion frequently in the context of school districts, for example. The legislature has explicitly and intentionally left school districts off this list, you know, and so the list -- you know, the list that the legislature has provided Is -- is somewhat narrow and closely defined, but to -- to answer your question, you know, directly, there -- I -- I have not found anything that provides a better definition in terms of public facility or law enforcement than what you are reading here. And this is directly -- that -- that is a quote out of the statute, but there is no additional clarification beyond that. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 37 of 46 Taylor: Mr. Mayor, quick follow up? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Appreciate the -- kind of walking us through the coroner's responsibilities and duties. It was very informative. I felt like I learned it. I understand why it's kind of a bit of a gray area. Seems to me it's -- I feel like it's pretty sound in terms of -- that a coroner would -- could be considered a law enforcement entity, given the responsibilities that they are allowed to do under statute. I guess the question I would have for you would be if we get to a point where we are collecting impact fees and the court says, no, you can't do that, is the liability with the city or would it be more so with the county, because it's their impact fee and we are more of a facilitator of collecting them? Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council Member Taylor. Likely to be both, because -- in the sense that the county for sure because, you know, they are front and center collecting the fee and spending it or collecting it for particular purposes. But the city -- city and other cities, if they choose to participate as well, and we have always said that, you know, sort of all need to participate or it won't happen. So, other cities would be in the same boat. I guess we wouldn't be alone. But I would say -- to answer your question, the city would be directly involved in that litigation, because it's a city ordinance that allowed -- or is compelling the payment of that fee and so, you know, we are likely involved directly in that litigation. We would turn it to the county and contractually point to our contractual provision that says they need to defend and identify the city and we would rely upon that to put the county in the driver's seat to -- you know, to defend the action and to the extent there is an adverse judgment to actually make the city whole as well. As I indicated, there is some limitations on those types of clauses under the Idaho Constitution. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Kurt, I appreciate it as you went through this you said public safety facilities comma -- Starman: Yes. Whitlock: -- including law enforcement, fire stations, but in all the subsequent slides it talks about duties of the coroner and I don't know that apparatus or emergency medical or rescue or streetlights are treated similarly in Idaho code with definitions of duties. So, I'm still in a gray area into public safety facilities, when all we have referenced in other sections of code are duties related to if the sheriff has a conflict of interest or a coroner's inquest or things like that versus here is an apparatus, here is a fire station, here -- here are streetlights. So, is there anything you can do or say to help bridge that gap for me or -- or get past this comma? Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 38 of 46 Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council Member Whitlock. I fully understand your -- your point and your question. I think the most conservative -- and I'm not sure I can bridge that gap. Really, the -- the most conservative direct way to read that language from my perspective would be -- if the legislature went to -- basically has said you can use impact fees for certain things, water, sewer, parks and this category and what -- the way I read this language -- and, you know, the way sort of statutory interpretation works, I would read it to say public facility, public safety facilities and the common meaning really -- this is going a bit far, but I'm going to say for this to make the point -- limited to law enforcement, fire stations and apparatus, emergency medical, rescue and streetlighting functions. Because they didn't say including -- they didn't use the language of including without limitation or including, but not limited to. They used the word including and so that sort of gives you -- this is your subset that you are going to work with. So, if they use language like, including but not limited to, or without limitation I would have a different interpretation about it. So, really, that's one that -- that lawyers could argue about and different judges could likely come to different conclusions about, but the most conservative reading of that language is if you want to just sort of be in a safe harbor would be we know the legislature has intended that law enforcement is a public safety facility. Fire stations and apparatus both qualify under that definition. Likewise for EMS and streetlights. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I -- I think I'm still struggling. I think -- I think similar to Councilman Whitlock. I'm still struggling and I do feel like this is an example where I think the county being proactive and getting some clarity on this is the best thing to do to me. I -- I don't want to go down the path of considering an agreement saying, well, we can consider this agreement, but the real risk to the city is when we actually implement an ordinance. Once you get the ball rolling on something it kind of takes on a life of its own and I -- I don't want our partners at the county to rely on us on this coroner one specifically if we haven't gotten clarity. It sounds like there are two paths to getting that that they could pursue. They can get an opinion from the Attorney General. That's an option that they -- you just said that they could do. Or they could go to a District Court it sounds like. I -- I would love for us to go back to the county and say, hey, we would like -- we would like you to try to pursue one of these two options to get some clarity on this, because we are concerned we think it's a gray area. I just -- I -- what I don't want to do is like go all the way down the path, embrace our own interpretation and, then, end up taking on risk to the city because ultimately we end up implementing these impact fees. Like I -- I think we should just get clarity on this. That -- that's where I'm at on the coroner one. Starman: Mr. Mayor and Council, as you are thinking about that and deliberating, maybe that makes perfect sense and the Council will make that decision. Sort of a corollary to that thought process would be, then, you know, what -- you may want to think about it as you are thinking about this and deliberating. If we pursue the -- the thought that Council Member Strader just presented, the corollary to do we want to do Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 39 of 46 anything with the other two fees at this time, EMS and the jail, or do you want to keep them all together until we have better clarity relative to the coroner? So, that would be a related question that you may want to think about as you do a break and -- and reach your decision. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Kurt, on that line of thinking, if we opt to set aside the coroner question and pursue the others and we move down that path, if we do get that additional clarity that gives us assurance that all is well, do we just come back with another agreement that's specific to the coroner that we would pass and, then, kind of beyond that does that create problems for the county working with other municipalities who have maybe chosen a different approach? Because I'm just wondering if Star -- or, you know, Garden City, Boise, Kuna, they pursue kind of the similar path and we have kind of got a bit of a different way of getting there, does that create a problem if we all have sort of different pathways to getting to the same goal or does it need to be the same with every municipality? Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council Member Taylor. I think it was sort of two questions there. Basically with regard to -- I will answer the first, which is, you know, if we -- let's say hypothetically one of the scenarios is we leave the coroner's fee out of the agreement today, but let's say hypothetically the county gets an opinion from the Attorney General's office in six weeks and says that this is acceptable, to answer that part of the question, yes, the city could either enter into a new agreement at that time or amend the agreement that excluded the coroner's office and we could -- we could catch up with the process there. To the second question as to impacts with other cities and the county overall, what I heard the -- what I heard the county say in previous discussions and just makes sense to me, you know, the 10,000 foot level, is that -- think Mr. Rutherford in particular made comments very similar to what I'm going to say now. It's sort of -- we all -- all the cities need to participate or it won't happen. So, think the county is essentially -- what I have heard the county say is that, you know, as we get farther into the process if a city chooses not to participate hypothetically in the coroner's fee, likely, the county -- what I heard Mr. Rutherford say is likely the county would not pursue that fee, because they want unanimity, need unanimity to have, you know, a county -- truly a countywide fee. So, I think the county -- I don't want to speak for them. Mr. Letson, you know, may be available online if he would like to speak. What I have heard is that if all the cities are not in agreement on a particular fee, the county would not likely pursue that to the finish line. Letson: Mayor, this is Leon Letson with Ada county. Simison: Mr. Letson. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 40 of 46 Letson: Sorry. I have been on mute trying not to step on Kurt's toes as he presented to you. So, thank you for your time and, Kurt, thanks for a very detailed presentation on the coroner. When I read it I was like, well, this is pretty clear this works as an impact fee. But, you know, I understand we are still kind of wrestling with that gray area. You know, I -- pursuing an advice letter from the Attorney General -- General on this issue, we are happy to pursue that. You know, I would like to back up and just remind Mayor and Council that this agreement is really more of a pre-agreement than anything else. It -- you know, you still would need to go through the process of amending your Comprehensive Plan to bring these CIPS into your guiding document, the -- the comprehensive plan. So -- so, I -- I guess I would ask -- give us an opportunity to prove that this actually fits. Let's not stop the process now or -- I mean best case would be alternative one here, where we can have you agree to consider all of them. In the event that this advice letter comes back in some negative take on the coroner, then, that's pretty easy for us to remove it from everybody's consideration, because we are, obviously, not going to do anything that violates state law. I guess alternative two we could accept as well. We have had Eagle and Star already adopt the coroner CIP into their Comprehensive Plan. Again, that doesn't affect them in any way until they actually establish an ordinance and -- and start collecting a fee. It's really just -- we acknowledge this plan is relevant in terms of how the coroner functions and serves our community and -- and what we should do to protect it really. I mean that's a rough paraphrase of what the purpose of the CIP and the comp plan does, but that is what it's doing there. So -- so, again, I -- I would hope we could go for one here and give us some -- a chance to -- to pursue that advice from the Attorney General if that's the -- the will of the Council here. But I guess worst case I would hope we could get to number two tonight at least to allow us to continue making progress on the other two CIPs and the services provided through those. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I -- I -- I think it's really just so everyone is going in with their eyes open; right? So, if the county understands that we are still considering the agreements, but that the city -- at least I'm the only one so far. I don't know if other Council Members want that opinion from the Attorney General. I -- I would like something like that personally. That -- that would make me feel more comfortable. But I would be okay with -- as long as we are communicating really clearly to you, our partners at the county, like this is something that we would like to see, an outside opinion to interpret this. I'm okay with still pursuing it, as long as you understand that, you know, if we don't get a favorable opinion, then, that would jeopardize, you know, that -- that agreement -- that component. I just don't want to lead -- you know, lead somebody astray. That's all. Letson: Sorry. Sorry. This is the trouble with virtual meetings and virtual attendance. Yes. No. I -- I get it. And, again, you know, the law is the law and we are going to follow it. You know, we -- we believe we are in a good place on the coroner here and -- and, again, I would point to some of the things in Kurt's presentation that -- that got us Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 41 of 46 there. But, yeah, I mean at the end of the day we -- we have to follow the law. We -- we can't -- we -- we wouldn't -- we would remove that immediately if it was determined to not be a legal -- a service eligible for impact fees. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Hey, Leon, you can stay on if you want. Can you just give Council some understanding -- because this question has come up a little bit. So, kind of walk the Council through what actions have you taken to try and seek some clarification on the coroner piece and if you haven't done anything that's fine, but I think it's important that before we take an action tonight to have some understanding is what the county's actions are -- would be following tonight's decision to start working towards providing some of us that clarity and confidence. Letson: Yes. Mayor. Thank you, Council Member. So, you know, I -- I will just speak to the hours and rooms with our attorneys and Kurt and his team to hash out this. I think we produced -- I can't remember how many pages that document was, Kurt, in terms of your questions about the impact fees and -- and our thoughts on how -- how we would answer those questions and there was an extensive section dedicated to the coroner. So, I mean at this point it hasn't risen above the level of our respective legal -- again, I -- the Attorney General option is -- that's the first time I have heard of that and I'm happy to go pursue that and I don't know how quickly this -- he is turning out advice letters, but as quickly as I can get one I will work to get it to you. Again, I -- if we need that as the final say on this, then, we will -- we will work hard to -- to give that to you, because it, obviously, betters our position with every jurisdiction that we are working with. But at this point it's just been the -- the legal teams of Ada County and Meridian kind of kicking this back and forth and -- and, you know, obviously, we are coming down on different sides of that a little bit and -- and that's -- yeah, that's where it's at. Cavener: Thanks for that, Leon. I appreciate it. Simison: So, Council, would you like us to put something on the agenda in the future for further feedback or do you want to move forward on anything at this time? Cavener: Mayor, I will just -- I will weigh in on kind of my thought. I'm supportive of moving forward with this process. I -- and I want to commend Council Member Strader, she -- what I was hearing from her is we don't want to lead our partners astray in saying by agreeing to do this that means we have bought all in and, then, to come back and say, hey, we have got some concerns here and to say, well, you told us early on that you were in support of it. I appreciate I think that -- that level of diligence and reminder toward our county friends, I look at this as beginning the process. I'm supportive of having the conversation. Quite frankly, I'm going to need more than just a letter from the Attorney General or from a District Court weighing in. I'm going to want to hear from our citizens on this. I mean I think this is a long process that's going to involve a lot of Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 42 of 46 engagement with a lot of different folks, but I'm open to at least beginning it. So, for where I'm coming from, Kurt, I'm in support of moving -- you know, approving the agreements, beginning this process, recognizing that before any action would be taken on any impact fees, coroner or otherwise, there is going to be a robust process where Council will feel very confident in any decision that we make, whether it's in support or in opposition. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Yeah. I'm in agreement with Councilman Cavener on that. I -- I think it's important to get the process moving. I know that by doing that we are not tying our hands completely to -- to the end goal here by the county, but I -- I think it's been discussed enough. I think there has been a feedback. I'm comfortable moving ahead with what we have, but, you know, getting the -- getting additional outside clarification on this question about the coroner and those fees, that's great. That's just going to make us more comfortable. I think everyone will -- will like what we hear -- or at least we will know what we should do based on that and I -- I do think that that responsibility lies with the county to clarify that. Obviously, we -- we can read the law, we can -- we can have our opinions about what it means, but if we need that additional clarification I think we should emphasize to the county that that's their responsibility to -- to get that clarification, but we are going to need that to reach that final conclusion. So, I am supportive of tonight moving ahead with these agreements. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Not to make this drag on any longer, but it's been very well discussed and torn apart here tonight and very simply I agree with moving ahead with these agreements at this time. Simison: Okay. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I don't know if we are going to vote, but I'm fine with moving forward so long as the county's been on -- and I appreciate you joining the meeting, by the way. Thank you very much. They have heard us. They understand and it sounds like they are willing to pursue an advice letter or a District Court judgment of some sort to weigh in on it. That's okay to me. As long as you guys understand that that's something that at least -- at least one person definitely would like to have. So, I'm okay with that. As long Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 43 of 46 as everyone's expectations are set and people won't be disappointed if it's not the outcome they want I'm okay with it. Simison: So, Council, what -- would you like to -- is there a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: To come back on -- Cavener: Why don't you bring the agreement back on Consent and that will give Council an opportunity to review before any vote is taken. Simison: Okay. All right. Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council Members. Letson: Thank you very much, everyone. ORDINANCES 26. Ordinance No. 25-2086: An ordinance (330 N. Linder Rd. — H-2024- 0048) annexing Lot 3 of Heppers Acre Subdivision (a recorded plat on file in Book 20 of Plats at Page 1298, records of Ada County, Idaho) and a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 0.983 acres of such real property from R1 (Estate Residential) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. With that we will move on to our ordinances. First up is Ordinance No. 25-2086. Ask the clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance related to 330 N. Linder Rd. — H- 2024-0048) annexing Lot 3 of Heppers Acre Subdivision (a recorded plat on file in Book 20 of Plats at Page 1298, records of Ada County, Idaho) and a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 0.983 acres of such real property from R1 (Estate Residential) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 44 of 46 and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? If not, Clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Simison: Next up is Ordinance No. 25-2087 ask the clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Mr. Mayor on, the last item there was no motion. Simison: Oh, I'm sorry. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Make a -- I would move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2086. Cavener: Second. Simison: Motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2086. Is there discussion? If not clerk call the roll -- oh. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Is it Ordinance 25-2086 or is it Ordinance 25-2087? Sorry. I'm a little confused. Simison: We are back -- we are going back to 2086 that didn't have an official motion. Strader: Thank you. Simison: Any discussion? If not clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 45 of 46 Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 27. Ordinance No. 25-2087: An ordinance (Core & Main — H-2024-0066) annexing a parcel of land located in a portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 5.0 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Now, we will go on to Ordinance No. 25-2087, ask the clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance annexing a parcel of land located in a portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 5.0 acres of such real property from RUT to the I-L zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? Seeing none, do I have a motion? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2087. Cavener: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2087. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Meridian City Council Work Session June 17,2025 Page 46 of 46 Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Simison: Council, we have reached the end of our agenda. One last item. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Two quick last items. Just a reminder it's Dairy Days and so lots of great activities to be participating in and look forward to seeing some of you at the parade. And with that, Mr. Mayor, I move that we adjourn the meeting. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6.42 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 7-8-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 7-8-2025 E IDIAN�- )AH AGENDA ITEM Department Reports E NDIAM.- IDAHO ow The Office of the %Iyor PRO CAL A4 i AT011ON Whereas, being a Mountain View High School Boys Track Team member is more than sprints , relays , hurdles , field events and achieving state titles . It is training to build leadership , character, confidence , teamwork and resilience — all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world; and, Whereas, the Mountain View boys track won the District 3 6A championship with a score of 117 points and stole the show at the Idaho State 5A/6A championship meet with 100 point score that allowed the Mavericks to knock off the eight-time defending state champion; and, Whereas, multiple student athletes achieved personal records and contributed to an unforgettable team victory to bring home the first boys track and field team state title in program history for Mountain View ; and, Whereas, the leadership , training and discipline of their coaches Bryce Alexander, Matt Behrens , Jamie Blandford, Clifford Dillard, Dallas Fagen, JW Hardy, Tracy Harris , Lauren Horan, Mike Jones , Wendell Lawrence, Craig Morton, Victoria Rodriguez, Pat Sewall , Adam Sisson, and Bruce Walters helped all team members Jacob Allen, Nathan Bunning, Alden Chamberlain, Braidon Earl , Cashton Gennette , Catcher Gennette , Jace Hart, Benjamin Jensen, Joe Miraya, Andrew Olson, Omar Osman, Kelby Rice , Austin Riley, Behr Scott , Beau Stewart, Marcus Stoor, Keoni Valko , Koda VanDahlen, and Kellen Walbuck to focus their talents and passion to become a winning team , with each player making valuable contributions to their victory . Therefore, 1 , Mayor Robert E . Simison, hereby proclaim June 17 "' , 2025 as ,vlountain 'View HighSc �iooC Of Boys Track State Cham.pions Day in the City of Meridian and call upon the com50E * y to join me in congratulating the Mountain View Mays on their remarkable athletic achievement an en ' n Meridian so proudly in the state tournament. Dated this 17 day of June, 2025 imi on, Mayor Luke Ca n r, City Council President Liz Strader, City Council Vice -President John Overton, City Council ' Anne Little Roberts , City Council Doug Taylor, City Council Brian Whitlock, City Council w 3 el 1mFF ..� ` NI TOT 4 a _ j � . NN ��L'^ i' � ��� - r - - �• - . , It I Not jr 74 tillillikiiiiiPJ i.. . r A �, Alm �. r n - n - ��� i z ` - ,- _ /,yJ, l 1 � ���� It z - \\ �lZl\ . , \ , E IDAN I LHO The Office of the Nayor PRO CAL Ail ATION Whereas, being a Mountain View High School Girls Track Team member is more than sprints , relays , hurdles , field events and achieving state titles . It is training to build leadership , character, confidence , teamwork and resilience — all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world; and, Whereas, the Mountain View girls track and field team won the 6A meet with an impressive 93 points malting a statement that the Mavericks are the team to beat; and, Whereas , multiple student athletes achieved personal records and contributed to an unforgettable team victory to bring home the first girls state title for the Mavericks since 2018 ; and, Whereas, the leadership , training and discipline of their coaches Bryce Alexander, Matt Behrens , Jamie Blandford, Clifford Dillard, Dallas Fagen, JW Hardy, Tracy Harris , Lauren Horan, Mike Jones , Wendell Lawrence , Craig Morton, Victoria Rodriguez, Pat Sewall , Adam Sisson, and Bruce Walters helped all team members Keilana Brewer, Brynn Burnham, Bree Carpon, Kami Clayton, Sophie Coulson, Aleysa Earl , Kristin Geiser, Talia Johnson , Taysia Johnson, Quincy Keller, Addie Lee , Clara Lowry, Lydia Malan, Jocelyn Mathews , Madi McCarty, Jewel Pence , Austyn Utz and Lilja Walmsley to focus their talents and passion to become a winning team, with each player malting valuable contributions to their victory . Therefore, I, Mayor Robert E . Simison, hereby proclaim June 17 "' , 2025 as J fountain 'View High SchooC Gtr& Track State Cham_pions Day in the City of Meridian and call upon the community to join me in congratulating the Mountain View Mays on their remarkable athletic achievement and v iepresenting Meridian so proudly in the state tournament .bf Dated this 171h day of June, 2025 o rt E . Si is n, Mayor Luke Cave e , City Council President Liz Strader, City Council Vice-President John Overton , City Council Anne Little Roberts , City Council Doug Taylor, City Council Brian Whitlock, City Council w 3 el 1mFF ..� ` NI TOT 4 a _ j � . NN ��L'^ i' � ��� - r - - �• - . , It I Not jr 74 tillillikiiiiiPJ i.. . r A �, Alm �. r n - n - ��� i z ` - ,- _ /,yJ, l 1 � ���� It z - \\ �lZl\ . , \ , E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 26 of 26 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:48 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-17-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-17-2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the June 3, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 32 of 32 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:35 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-17-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-17-2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Vanguard Village Subdivision No. 1 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0009) CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$55.00 Electronically Recorded 7.1 Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025w*037874- Boise, Idaho Pgs= 12 vbailey 061-18/2025:08:12 :35- AM CITY OF MERIDIAN 'IDAHO $0.,00 Electronically Reco' rde' d Project Name or Subdivision Name: Vang uard Village Stibdivi-sion Na l Sanitary Sewer- & Water Main Easement Number: �- IdenuCy Ills EnsellreM by seguentiat'mmUer if the project cantanu imreThan aue easement of this type. See uutmctiotis/c(tecklist for additional information. For Internal Use -Only Record Nunlber: ESMT**2025*-0009 SC►NiTAR1 Y SEWER 11 ........ .....AND 'WATER 1VIAIlv EASEMEN1.10 T `. TICS Easement Agreement made this 17th day of Jane 2025 between. Ten Mi M- ercial le Com LLC ("Grantor") aC'l*tynd the ofMer-idian, an Idaho unicip al. Corp oration (" Grantee S , the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer end water main right- of- way :Z across tie premises and property here inaft er particularly bounded and describe d; and. WI��REAS , the sanitary sewer and water is to b e provided for thrflugh undergr o und pipelines to be constructed- 'by oth...A._.&W" and As , it. will be necessary to maintain and service said I)ipelines from time to time by the Grantee, NOW, THEREFORE ,. in. consideration of the benefits . to be received by the Grantor . . and Ilk , other -oo and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and conve. . --U 0 the Grantee the- right-of-way for an easement far the - santary 'sewer, operation and maintenance of and -water mains over .-an , across e fol.'Io' wing descn e property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and '.. ) The e as ement hereby .granted -is.. for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer an. water mains and their allied facilities, together with.. their inamtenanc- e, repair and. replacement �t the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and -all times .. TO .HAVE AND T QLD , tie said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its. successors and assigns foreNrer.-, IT IS E�'RESS STOOD .l�l�t [� AGREED, Y and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or, p g other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent or to . under.t g such repairs and. maintenance. However, Grantee shano . bell. t responsible for repair ing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in. this easement that was plac ed there invio- ation ofth is easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Maiti Easement Pale 1 Version 0.1 /0112024 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Vanguard Village Subdivision No 1 Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Easement Number: 1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type. See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only 'Ple c r'c - rc co rd +o Record Number: ESMT-2025-0009 5e R�.�p� aCe. p uode o 3 *�e L1 c;mt6ed oua W ► *h Cc� rrecw paq S 3 z y L, e �Li Oa6clfl I� SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 17th day of June 2025 between Ten Mile Commercial LLC ("Grantor") and the City ofMeridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation (" Grantee") ; WHEREAS , the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the might-of--way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times . T O HAVE AND T O HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee , its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 Instrument # 202&037874 06/18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 2 of 12 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to , buildings , trash enclosures , carports , sheds , fences , trees , or deep-rooted shrubs . THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then , to such extent, such right" of way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of-no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors , assigns , heirs, personal representatives , purchasers , or transferees of any kind , IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR : Ten Mile Commercial LLC tRl IA .��� -�PN'sioM ;V �� �''�•� Q :al at o �OTARy � . mme ; v . MOP AUBOG\0 smaism STATE OF IDAHO ) '% s }A'9�s o 9 t ma% ss 0 `\\ County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 05 L� ZULS (date) by pcna5 A )VntiitS�} {name of individual) , [complete the following ifsigning in a representative capacity, or strike thefollowing ifsigning in an individual capacity] on behalf of (` Y1pk � L1 (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed) , in the following representative capacity: tArnAque v (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires ; Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01 /2024 Instrument # 2025 -037874 06/ 18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 3 of 12 GRANTEE : CITY OF MERIDIAN Rob6ttll . imis n , M yor 6 - 17 - 2025 rC46' IDR IAN.�- Sfi11. J Attest by C s Johns ity Clerk 6 - 17- 2025 STATE OF IDAHO , ) ss . County of Ada } This record was acknowledged before me on 6 - 17 -2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively . Notary Stamp Below CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No . 67390 Uf NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Notary Signature My Commission Expires : 3 - 28 -2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01 /01/2024 Instrument # 2025 -037874 nR D U R R n 06/18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 4 of 12 z. Project No : 240076 Date : January 23 , 2025 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBITA CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A series of easements located in the NE1 /4 of the SWIM and the NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 of Section 15 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian , City of Meridian , Ada County, Idaho , more particularly described as follows : SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT No . 1 COMMENCING at the center east one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears N . 89 ° 14 '39 "W. , 1321 .43 feet ; thence , along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 , A. N . 89014 ' 39 "W . , 600 .43 feet ; thence, leaving said north boundary, Be S . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 34 .47 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of- way of W. Grand Mogul Drive , extended ; thence , along said centerline , C . S . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 248 .47 feet ; thence, leaving said centerline , D . N . 89023 ' 23 "W . , 34. 50 feet to a point on the westerly right - of-way of S . Umbria Hills Way, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence, along said westerly right- of-way, 1 . S . 00036 ' 37 "W . , 35 .00 feet; thence, leaving said westerly right - of- way, 2 . N . 89023 ' 23 "W. , 59 . 50 feet , thence , 3 . N . 00036 ' 37 " E . , 35 . 00 feet ; thence , 4 . S . 89023 ' 23 " E . , 59 . 50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT No. 2 COMMENCING at the center east one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears N . 89014 ' 39 "W. , 1321 .43 feet ; thence , along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 , A . N . 89014 ' 39 "W . , 600 .43 feet ; thence, leaving said north boundary, Be S . 00036 ' 37 "W . , 34 .47 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of-way of W. Grand Mogul Drive, extended ; thence , along said centerline , 332 N . Broadmore Way I Nampa, 0 83687 1 208 .442 .6300 1 mmardurra .com Instrument # 2025 - 037874 06/ 18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 5 of 12 Project No : 240076 Date: January 23 , 2025 Page 2 of 6 C . 5 . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 248 .47 feet ; thence, leaving said centerline, D . 5 . 89023 ' 23 " E . , 34 . 50 feet to a point on the easterly right - of-way of S . Umbria Hills Way, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence , leaving said easterly right - of- way, 1 . S . 89023 '23 " E . , 49 . 50 feet ; thence , 2 . 5 . 00036 ' 37 " W . , 35 .00 feet; thence, 3 . N . 89023 ' 23 "W. , 49 . 50 feet to said easterly right - of-way ; thence , along said easterly right - of-way 4 . N . 00036 ' 37 " E . , 35 . 00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT No . 3 COMMENCING at the center east one- sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears N . 89114 '39 "W. , 1321 .43 feet ; thence, along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 , A. N . 89014 ' 39 "W . , 600 .43 feet ; thence, leaving said north boundary, Be S . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 34 .47 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of-way of W. Grand Mogul Drive, extended ; thence , along said centerline the following courses , C . S .00036 ' 37 " W. , 421 . 96 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve , thence , D . Southeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 200 . 00 feet, an arc length of 139 . 76 feet, through a central angle of 40 °02 ' 18 " , of which the long chord bears S . 19 °24 '32 " E . , 136 . 93 feet; thence, non -tangent from said curve , leaving said centerline, E . S . 50034 ' 19 "W . 5 34. 50 feet to a point on the westerly right - of-way of S . Umbria Hills Way, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence , along said westerly right - of-way , 1 . S . 39025 '41 " E . , 18 .00 feet ; thence, leaving said westerly right- of-way , 2 . S . 50034 ' 19 "W. , 59 . 50 feet ; thence, 3 . N . 39025 '41 "W. , 38 . 00 feet ; thence, 4 . N . 50034 ' 19 " E . , 60 . 35 feet to the a point on said westerly right - of-way and the beginning of a non -tangent curve ; thence, 2 332 N . Broodmore Way I cmnpa, 0 83687 208 .442 .6300 www . ardurraxom Instrument # 2026mO37874 06/ 18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 6 of 12 Pro ct No : 240076 Date. anuary 23 , 2025 Page 3 f 6 5 . So theasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 2 4 . 50 feet , an arc length of 20 . 02 feet, through a central angle of 04153 ' 33 " , of which the Ion hord bears 5 . 36 ° 58 ' 55 " E . , 20. 02 feet t the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , SEWER AND WAT EASEMENT No . 4 COMMENCING at the ce er east one - sixteenth co r er of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Sectio bears N . 89014 ' 39 "W. , 1321 .43 feet ; thence, along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 , A. N . 89014 '39 "W . , 600 .43 feet ; t ence, leave g said north boundary, Be S . 00036 ' 37 "W . , 34.47 feet to the i ter ection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of-way of W . Grand Mogul Dri , extended ; thence , along said centerline the following courses , C . S . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 421 . 96 feet to e beginn ' g of a tangent curve , thence, D . Southeasterly along said cur e to the left, hav g a radius of 200 . 00 feet , an arc length of 139 . 76 feet, through a central angl of 40 °02 ' 18 " , of w 'ch the long chord bears S . 19024 '32 " E . , 136 . 93 feet ; thence , tangent from said curve , E . S . 3902541 " E . , 18 .00 f et to the beginning of a tange curve ; thence, F. Southeasterly alon aid curve to the left , having a radius f 200 . 00 feet, an arc length of 154 . 54 feet, through a ce ral angle of 44 °50 '43 " , of which the Ion chord bears S . 61051 '03 " E . , 152 . 57 feet; thence , non -tan nt from said curve leaving said centerline, G . S . 05043 ' 36 "W , 34 . 50 feet to a point on the southernly right- of- y of W. Navigator Dr , said point being the PO NT OF BEGINNING ; thence , along said southerly rig - of- way, 1 . 5 . 840 ' 24 " E . 2 27 .00 feet , thence , leaving said southerly right - of-w , 2 . S . 0 43136 " W . , 59 . 50 feet ; thence, 3 . 84016 ' 24 "W. 2 35 . 00 feet ; thence, 4 . . 05043 ' 36 " E . 1 59 . 64 feet to the a point on said southerly right- of-way and the ginning of a non - tangent curve ; thence, 3 332 N . Broadmore Way Nampa , ID 83687 208 .442 .6300 m"Y . ardurraxom Instrument # 2025 -037874 06/18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 7 of 12 roject No : 240076 ate : January 23 , 2025 Pa e4of6 5o utheasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 234 . 50 feet , an c length of 8 .00 fe through a central angle of 01 ° 57' 18" , of which the long chord bears S 3 ° 17 '45 " E . , 8 .00 feet the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT No . COMMENCING at the cen r east one - sixteenth corner of said S tion 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Sectio bears N . 89 ° 14 ' 39 "W. , 1321 .43 f t ; thence , along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 , A. N . 89014 ' 39 "W . , 600 .43 feet ; t ence, leaving said nor boundary, B . S . 00036 ' 37 "W . , 34 .47 feet to the tersection of e centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of- way of W. Grand Mogul D ' ve, extend ; thence , along said centerline the following courses , Co 5 . 00036 ' 37 " W. , 421 . 96 feet to the begin g of a tangent curve , thence, D . Southeasterly along said curve to the ft, ha ' ng a radius of 200 . 00 feet , an arc length of 139 . 76 feet, through a central angle of 40 °0 ' 18 " , of ich the long chord bears S . 19124 '32 " E . , 136 . 93 feet; thence , tangent from said curve , E . S . 39025 '41 " E . , 18 .00 feet to t beginning of a tange curve , thence , F. Southeasterly along said c ve to the left , having a radius f 200 . 00 feet , an arc length of 154 , 54 feet, through a central an e of 44 °50'43 " , of which the Ion chord bears S . 61 ° 51 '03 " E . , 152 . 57 feet ; thence, non - tangent fr said curve leaving said centerline, G . N . 0504336 " E . , 34 . 5 feet to a point on the northernly right - of- y of W. Navigator Dr, said point being the POINT BEGINNING and the beginning of non -tange t curve ; thence , along said northerly right- o way, 1 . Northwes rly along said curve to the right, having a radius of 165 , 0 feet, an arc length of 8 . 00 feet, thr gh a central angle of 02046' 14" , of which the long chord b rs N . 82 ° 53 ' 17 "W. , 8 . 00 feet ; t nce, leaving said northerly line , non - tangent from said curve , 2 . N . 0 043 ' 36 " E . , 59 . 31 feet; thence, 3 . . 84016 ' 24 " E . , 35 .00 feet ; thence , 4 So05043 ' 36 " W . , 59 . 50 feet to a point on said northerly right- of- way; thence , al g said northerly right- of-way , 4 332 N . Broadmore Way Nampa , ID 83687 208 .442 .6300 www . ardurraxom Co r rec: A-ed Project No : 240076 Date : November 3 , 2025 Page 3 of 6 5 . Southeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 234. 50 feet , an arc length of 20 . 02 feet, through a central angle of 04° 53 '33 " , of which the long chord bears 5 . 36 ° 58 ' 55 " E . , 20 . 02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , Sewer and Water Easement No . 4 COMMENCING at the center east one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears N . 89 ° 14' 39 "W. , 1321 .43 feet ; thence , along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4, A . N . 89014' 39 " W. , 600 .43 feet , thence , leaving said north boundary, Be 5 . 00036 ' 37 " W . , 34. 47 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of-way of W . Grand Mogul Drive , extended ; thence , along said centerline the following courses , C . S . 00036 ' 37 " W . , 421 . 96 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve , thence , D . Southeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 200 . 00 feet, an arc length of 139 . 76 feet, through a central angle of 40°02 ' 18 " , of which the long chord bears S . 19 ° 24' 32 " E . , 136 . 93 feet; thence , tangent from said curve , E . 5 . 39025 '41 " E . , 220 . 24 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve ; thence , F . Southeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 200 . 00 feet, an arc length of 154. 54 feet, through a central angle of 44050 '43 " , of which the long chord bears 5 . 61 ° 51 ' 03 " E . , 152 . 57 feet; thence , leaving said centerline , non -tangent from said curve , G . Se05043 ' 36 " W. , 34. 50 feet to the southerly right- of- way of W . Navigator Dr , said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence , along said southerly right- of-way, 1 . S . 84016 ' 24" E . , 27 . 00 feet; thence , leaving said southerly right- of-way, 2 . S . 05043 ' 36 " W. , 59 . 50 feet; thence , 3 . N . 84016 ' 24"W. , 35 . 00 feet; thence , 4 . N . 05043 ' 36 " E . , 59 . 64 feet to said southerly right- of- way and the beginning of a non -tangent curve ; thence , I 3 332 N . Broadmore Way Nampa, ID 83687 208 .442 . 6300 www . ardurraxom Correc)ved Project No : 240076 Date : November 3 , 2025 Page 4 of 6 5 . Southeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 234. 50 feet, an arc length of 8 . 00 feet, through a central angle of 01 ° 57 ' 18 " , of which the long chord bears S . 83017 ' 45 " E . , 8 . 00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , Sewer and Water Easement No . 5 COMMENCING at the center east one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears N . 89014' 39 "W. , 1321 .43 feet ; thence , along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4, A. N . 89014' 39 " W. , 600 .43 feet ; thence , leaving said north boundary, Be S . 00036 ' 37 " W. , 34.47 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of- way of W . Grand Mogul Drive , extended ; thence , along said centerline the following courses , Co S . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 421 . 96 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve , thence , D . Southeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 200 . 00 feet, an arc length of 139 . 76 feet, through a central angle of 40002 ' 18 " , of which the long chord bears S . 19 ° 24' 32 " E . , 136 . 93 feet; thence , tangent from said curve , E . S . 39025 '41 " E . , 220 . 24 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve , thence , F. Southeasterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 200 . 00 feet, an arc length of 154. 54 feet, through a central angle of 44050 '43 " , of which the long chord bears S . 61 ° 51 ' 03 " E . , 152 . 57 feet ; thence , leaving said centerline , non -tangent from said curve , G . N . 05043 ' 36 " E . , 34 . 50 feet to the northernly right- of-way of W . Navigator Dr, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING and the beginning of non -tangent curve ; thence , along said northerly right- of-way, 1 . Northwesterly along said curve to the right, having a radius of 165 . 50 feet, an arc length of 8 . 00 feet, through a central angle of 02 °46 ' 14 " , of which the long chord bears N . 82 ° 53 ' 17 " W . , 8 . 00 feet; thence , leaving said northerly right- of-way, non - tangent from said curve , 2 . N . 05043 ' 36 " E . , 59 . 31 feet ; thence , 3 . S . 84016 ' 24" E . , 35 . 00 feet ; thence , 4 . S . 05043 ' 36 "W. , 59 . 50 feet to said northerly right- of-way ; thence , along said northerly right- of- way, 4 332 N . Broadmore Way Nampa, ID 83687 208 .442 . 6300 www . ardunn . com Instrument # 202 &037874 06/18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 8 of 12 Project No : 240076 Date : January 23 , 2025 Page 5 of 6 5 , N . 84016 ' 24 "W. , 27 . 00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT No . 6 COMMENCING at the center west one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears S . 89014 '48 " E . , 1322 . 78 feet ; thence , along the west boundary of said NE1 /4 of the SW1 /4 , A. S . 00039 ' 32 "W . , 13 . 50 feet to a point on the southerly right - of- way of W. Grand Mogul Dr. ; thence , along said southerly right of way the following courses , B . 5 . 89014 '48 " E . , 9 . 98 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve ; thence , C. Westerly along said curve to the right, having a radius of 4010 . 83 feet , an arc length of 21 . 26 feet , through a central angle of 00° 18 ' 13 " , of which the long chord bears S . 891,05 '41 " E . , 8 .00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence , continuing along said southerly right - of-way and said curve, 1 . Westerly along said curve to the right, having a radius of 4010 . 83 feet, an arc length of 20 .00 feet, through a central angle of 00 ° 17'09 " , of which the long chord bears S . 88 °48 '00" E . , 8 .00 feet ; thence , leaving said southerly right - of- way, non -tangent from said curve , 2 . St0201737W . , 51 . 60 feet ; thence, 3 . N . 88015 ' 35 "W. , 20 . 00 feet ; thence , 4 . Ne02017 ' 37 " E . , 51 .41 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT No . 7 COMMENCING at the center west one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears 5 . 89 ° 14 '48 " E . , 1322 .78 feet ; thence , along the north boundary of said NE1 /4 of the SW1 /4, A. S . 89014 '48 " E . , 370 . 98 feet ; thence , leaving said north boundary , Be S . 00045 ' 12 "W. , 24 .73 feet feet to a point on the southerly right - of-way of W. Grand Mogul Dr. , said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING and the beginning of a non -tangent curve ; thence , along said southerly right of way , 5 332 N . Broadmore Way Nampa , ID 83687 1 208 .442 .6300 www. ardurraxom Instrument # 2025 -037874 06/18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 9 of 12 Project No : 240076 Date : January 23 , 2025 Page 6 of 6 1 . Easterly along said curve to the left, having a radius of 4061 . 88 feet, an arc length of 20. 00 feet, through a central angle of 00 ° 16' 56 " , of which the long chord bears S . 88 ° 16 ' 22 " E . , 20 . 00 feet ; thence, leaving said southerly right - of- way , non -tangent from said curve , 2 . Sa02013 ' 23 "W. , 70 . 10 feet; thence, 3 . N . 88001 ' 19 "W. , 20 . 00 feet ; thence , 4 . N . 02013 ' 23 " E . , 70 . 01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . CONTAINING , IN AGGREGATE: 12 , 680 square feet (0 . 29 Ac . ) , ON� L LAND c G C a � � 13765 o0F M 6 332 N . Broadmore Way Nampa, ID 83687 208 .442 .6300 www . ardurra . com Instrument # 2025 =037874 06/ 18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 10 of 12 Q 2N5 ARDURRA GROUPING, THIS INSTRUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ARDURRA. ANY REPRODUCTION, REUSE OR MODIFICATION OF THIS INSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ARDURRA IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, EXHIBIT B - SEWER AND WATER EASEMENTS LOCATED IN THE NW114 OF THE SE114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN , ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2025 BASIS OF BEARING C1 /4 N89 '14' 39 " W 1321 , 43' W. GRAND MOGUL DR. CE1116 721 . 00 L1 � 600, 43' - - - - - - - - _ _ . . EASEMENT #2 0' 75' 150, 300' EASEMENT #1 i P O B #2 I SCALE: 1 " = 150' L8_ L9 c6 N i It L7 L3 Ls I LEGEND L3 L11 EASEMENT BOUNDARY i — — — PROPERTY BOUNDARY L5 3 I SECTION LINE EASEMENT #5 SET ALUMINUM CAP MON . g L26 I o CALCULATED POINT EASEMENT43 I SEE SHEET 3 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES � 1 h N P.O.BC#3 / L13 P.O.B, #5 ONA`�� , kh �1� ! C5 I L28 i " a 13765 �5 �<'� � i srq �23/25 �o OF �pP - I ,Q08 I 0 ' M A���y C4 L2o C3 P.O.B. #4 `� L24 _ _; / ARDURRA — —L19 W. NAVI-G J ry R DR. EASEMENT #4 J 332 N . BROADMORE WAY NAMPA, IDAHO 83687 208-442-6300 1 WWW,ARDURRA.COM L22 i zacwrv-xLwwawauEey SHEET 1 OF 3 ,wwuusv2m Instrument # 2025 -037874 06/18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 11 of 12 Q 2025 ARDURRA GROUPING, THIS INSTRUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OFARDURRA, ANY REPRODUCTION, REUSE OR MODIFICATION OF THIS INSTRUMENTOR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OFAROURRA IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, EXHIBIT B - SEWER AND WATER EASEMENTS LOCATED IN THE THE NE1 /4 OF THE SWIM OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2025 LEGEND EASEMENT BOUNDARY — - - PROPERTY BOUNDARY 0' 25' 50' 100, SECTION LINE B SET ALUMINUM CAP MON , SCALE: 1 " = 50' o CALCULATED POINT CW1 /16 P.O.B. #6 BASIS OF BEARING C1/4 - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - S89 '14'48' E 1322. 78 ' ., C1O Cit - - - -- - - - 370. 98' - - �- 951 . 80'L32 - - - - - - _ - - - - - W. GRAND MOGUL DR. n � - - � _ _ � - - J C72 L33 -- - ' - - - - I � J P.O.B. #7 ' EASEMENT #7 0 EASEMENT #6 r°p L35 J J LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L32 S00039'32"W 13, 50' c�ONpL�s L39 • „ ENS � CURVE TABLE L33 S89 '14'48"E 9. 98' L34 502 '17 ' 37 "W 51 . 60' a 13765 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA BEARING CHORD L35 N88'15' 35" W 20. 00' Jj 123/25 (0 C10 4010683' 21 . 26 ' 0'18'13" S89 '05141 " E 21 . 26' 7j Q f c11 4010. 63' 20, 00' o'n L36 NO2'17' 37"E 51 . 41 ' OF �NJ 'o9 " ssB'46'oo" E 20. 00' �090 ' MA���'y L37 S00'45' 12"W 24. 73' C12 4061 . 88' 20.00' O'16'56" S88'116' 22" E 20,00' 1 A L3 SO2'13'23"W 0. 10' �` ARDURR / L39 2 N88'01 '19 "W 0. 00' L40 NO2'13123"E 70. 01 ' 332 N . BROADMORE WAY NAMPA, IDAHO 83687 208-442-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM 24omo-wxBjEmm PUEhg SHEET 2 OF 3 .w&my2m Instrument # 2025 - 037874 06/ 18/2025 08 : 12 : 35 AM Page 12 of 12 © 2025 ARDURRA GROUP INC. THIS INSTRUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ARDURRA, ANY REPRODUCTION, REUSE OR MODIFICATION OF THIS INSTRUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ARDURRA IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. EXHIBIT B - SEWER AND WATER EASEMENTS LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE Lt S00'36' 37"W 34, 47' L15 S50'34'19" W 59, 50' L2 S00036' 37"W 421 , 96 ' L16 N39 '25' 41 " W 38, 00, L3 N89'23' 23"W 34. 50' L17 N50034' 19"E 60. 35' L4 SOO'36' 37"W 35, 00' L18 S39025'41 "E 220124' L5 N89 '23' 23"W 59. 50' L19 S05'43'36 " W 34. 50' L6 N00936'37 "E 35. 00' L20 S84'16' 24"E 27. 00' L7 S89023123"E 59. 50' L21 S05'43'36"W 59. 50' L8 S89 '23'23"E 34, 50' L22 N84'16 ' 24" W 35. 00' L9 S89923'23"E 49. 50' L23 N05043'36 "E 59. 64' L10 S00836 ' 37"W 35, 00, L24 N05'43'36 "E 34. 50' L11 N89 '23' 23" W 49. 50' L25 N05'43'36 "E 59. 31 ' L14 NOO'36'37 "E 35, 00' LL2 S84'16' 24"E 35. 00' S50'34'19" W 34. 50' SO5'43'36"W 59. 50' pL ANO N L S39025'41 "E 18, 00' N84'16124"W 27. 00' �` GENS go % , ` 0 13765 CURVE TABLE s� �23, 25 �0 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA BEARING CHORD qlF OF C1 200. 00' 139, 76' 40'02'18" S19024' 32"E 136, 93' 0 ' MA� ��� C2 234,50' 20, 02' 4'53' 33" S36058' 55"E 20, 02' C3 200.00' 156 . 54' 44'50' 43" S61 '51 '03"E 152. 57 ' /�/ � RDURR �4 C4 234.50' 8. 00' 1 '57'18" S83'17'45"E 8, 00' C5 165. 50' 8. 00' 2'46'14" N82'53' 17"W 8, 00' 332 N . BROADMORE WAY NAMPA, IDAHO 83687 208-442-6300 1 WWW.AROURRA.COM 240W6-V.X9.KWMPUEdq SHEET 3 OF 3 jmuARy2m ARDURRA Project No : 240076 Date : November 3 , 2025 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBITA CITY OF MERIDIAN SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS A series of permanent easements located in the NE1 /4 of the SW1 /4 and the NW1/4 of the SE1 /4 of Section 15 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian , City of Meridian , Ada County, Idaho , more particularly described as follows : Sewer and Water Easement No. 1 COMMENCING at the center east one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears N . 89 ° 14' 39 "W. , 1321 . 43 feet ; thence , along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4, A. N . 89014 ' 39 " W. , 600.43 feet ; thence , leaving said north boundary, Be S . 00036 ' 37 " W . , 34.47 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of-way of W . Grand Mogul Drive , extended ; thence , along said centerline , C . S . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 248 . 47 feet ; thence , leaving said centerline , D . N . 89023 ' 23 "W. , 34. 50 feet to the westerly right- of-way of S . Umbria Hills Way, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence , along said westerly right- of-way, 1 . S . 00036 ' 37 "W. , 35 . 00 feet; thence , leaving said westerly right- of-way, 2 . N . 89023 ' 23 " W. , 59 . 50 feet , thence , 3 . N . 00036 ' 37 " E . , 35 . 00 feet ; thence , 4. S . 89023 ' 23 " E . , 59 . 50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . TOGETHER WITH , Sewer and Water Easement No . 2 COMMENCING at the center east one - sixteenth corner of said Section 15 from which the center one - quarter corner of said Section bears N . 89 ° 14' 39 "W . , 1321 . 43 feet; thence , along the north boundary of said NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4, A . N . 89014 ' 39 " W . , 600 .43 feet; thence , leaving said north boundary, Be S . 00036 ' 37 " W. , 34. 47 feet to the intersection of the centerline of S . Umbria Hills Way and the south right- of-way of W . Grand Mogul Drive , extended ; thence , along said centerline, 332 N . Broadmore Way I Nampa, ID 83687 1 208 .442 . 6300 1 www .ardurro . com E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Wadsworth Meridian Subdivision Water Main Easement No. 2 (ESMT-2025- 0034) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037917 Boise,Idaho Pgs=5 vbailey 06/182025 09:11:10 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivision Name, WADSWORTH MERIDIAN SUBDIVISION WATER EASEMENT Water Main Easement lumber: 2 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For internal use only ESMT-2025-0034 Record Number WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 17th day of June 20 25 between, THIEN NGUYEN HANG NGUYEN ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B)' The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD; the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement, THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences,trees, or deep-rooted shrubs; Water Main Easement: Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 r , THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall-become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of--way and easement hereby granted which lies i within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, L assigns,heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said parties of the first part have.h(Feunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written, GRANTOR: I ca��a THIEN NGUYEN HONG NGUYEN'- STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 4 (2-w 5 (date) by Thien Nguyen. and Hong Nguyen. Notary Stamp Below ,utQ •�C. ago '..Notary Signature My Commission Expires; f / 1 I Z O Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-17-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-17-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-17-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian,in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 ACCURATE SURVEYING & MAPPING WADSWORTH "All s f R V l CF Job No. 24-205 MERIDIAN EXHIBIT A SUBDIVISION Water Easement Description—NW Corner of Site No. 2 An easement over and across a portion of northwest corner of Parcel A, Record of Survey No. 13633, and being across a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Wadsworth Meridian Subdivision, Book 121, Page 19070, Ada County Records, located in Government Lot 1, Section 5, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,being particularly described as follows: Commencing at the found brass cap monument at the section corner common to Sections 32 and 33, TAN., R.1 E. and Sections 4 and 5, T.3N., R.l E., from which the found brass cap monument at the quarter corner common to Section 32, TAN., R.IE, and Section 5 bears N 89°44'27" W a distance of 2656.46 feet; thence along the township line N 89'44'27" W for a distance of 497.37 feet; thence leaving said township line S 00'15'33" W for a distance of 80.92 feet to the northwest corner of said Parcel A; thence along the exterior boundary of Parcel A S 88' 17'48" E for a distance of 20.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence S 88°17'48"E along said boundary for a distance of 1.99 feet; Thence N 03°57'42" E along said boundary for a distance of 13.25 feet; Thence N 62°09'59"E along said boundary and the extension thereof for a distance of 12.95 feet to the existing ACHD easement shown on Instrument No. 2021-007979, Ada County Records; Thence S 89°11'20" E along said easement for a distance of 23.38 feet; Thence leaving said easement S 47°46'48" W for a distance of 4.04 feet; Thence N 88°42'34" W for a distance of 6.72 feet; Thence S 02'44'18" W for a distance of 7.34 feet; Thence S 47°46'48" W for a distance of 37.49 feet to the existing Water Main easement as shown on Instrument No. 2021-132715, Ada County Records; Thence N 01°42'12" E along said water easement for a distance of 15.80 feet to the Point of Beginning. Easement contains 0.013 acres or 558 square feet, more or less. d 11463 w OF N0 R�c� 1520 W. Washington St., Boise, ID 83702 . Phone: 208-488-4227 . AN J- D VAM.accuratesurveyors.com WADSWORTH MERIDIAN SUBDIVISION WA TER EASEME ��NT EXHIBIT B" MR. TEA OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 'A' RECORD OF SURVEY No. 13633 IN LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WADSWORTH MERIDIAN SUBDIVISION, BOOK 121, PAGE 19070, ADA COUNTY RECORDS LOCATED IN GOV'T LOT I IN THE NE 114 OF SECTION 5, T.3N., R. 1E., B.M. BASIS OF BEARING 32 N 89'4427" W 2656.46' T 4N., R. I E. 32 33 5 2159.09' - _ 497.37' T3N R.7E. 5 4 � I N E. USTICK RD. - o ACHD EASEMENT Alt L5 /NST. No. 202 7-00 79 79 (n L2 00 y L1 WADSWORT14 MERIDIAN L7 L6 SUBD±VISION J BLOCK 1 WATER EASEMENT No. 2 558t S.F. PARCEL A' 1 SCALE: 1"=50' I RECORD OF N SURVEY No. 13633 3075 E. USTICK RD, WNI 6I�Z 1. AN o s s Z7.2go LEGEND �9TF OF �OP� — — SECTION LINE PARCEL LINE — EASEMENT LINE TABLE BRASS CAP MONUMENT zQ CALCULATED POINT LINE BEARING DISTANCE O PLATTED LOT NUMBER L 1 S 88'1748" E 20.00' L2 S 88'1748" E 1.99' L3 N 03'5742" E 12.95' m Amm yACCURATE L4 N 62'0959 E 12.95"L5 S 89-1120 E 23.38' SURVEYING & MAPPING L6 S 47"4648" W 4.04' F- I- e L7 N 88'42 34" W 6.72' _ m 1520 W.Washington St. L8 S 02'44'18" W 7.34' � Boise,Idaho 83702 27 L9 S 47'46'48" W 37.49' px (208)esurve o www.accurates urveyors.com L IO N 01'42'12" E 1 15.80' '`FR V I t% DATE.•MAY,2025 JOB 24-205 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ada County Highway District Facility at 2023 Franklin Rd. Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0055) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-041684 Boise,Idaho Pgs=7 cfowler 07/02/2025 03:42:31 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Proieet Name: ACHD Facility at 2023 Franklin Road Water Main Easement Number: 01 Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one Water Main easement. (See Instructions for additional information), ESMT-2025-0055 WATER MAIN EASEMENT i THIS Easement Agreement is made this 7thday of June , 2025 between the Ada County Highway District,a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho("Grantor"),the City of Meridian,an Idaho municipal corporation("City"),and Veolia Water Idaho,Inc.,an Idaho corporation("Veolia"). City and Veolia shall be referred to collectively as"Grantees"herein. WHEREAS,the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described;and WHEREAS, the water mains, interconnect vault, and appurtenances are to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary for Grantees to maintain and service said water mains, interconnect vault,and appurtenances from time to time; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor,and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantees the right-of-way for a non-exclusive easement for the operation and maintenance of said water mains,interconnect vault,and appurtenances over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains, an interconnect vault, and appurtenances, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantees,with the right of access,with notice provided to the Grantor as practicable,to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantees,their successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto,that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantees shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance.However, Grantees shall not be responsible for repairing,replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees,brush,or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for i this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. Water Main Easement Page 1 Instrument # 2025-041684 07/02/2025 03:42:31 PM Page 2 of 7 THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantees that Grantor is•lawfudly seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land,and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the Iawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns,heirs,personal representatives,purchasers,or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Ada County Highway District e,'tir�wn STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada } This record was acknowledged before me on j�(date) by �iul1l WAV 1,-Pl (name of individual),[complete the following if signing in a represetgattve capaci , or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of M(A ttl (name of en 'ty on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following rep en ive capacity: 1 va E r iL' A&iarA_Y- (type of authority such as officer or trustee) ,���rC►•.•••••••••.•.y s'*, otary Signature t jAOTAR ``'7�t My Commission Expires: 0 a'P _ C t rr � �• 4i 4 OF Water Main Easement Page 2 Instrument # 2025-041684 07/02/2025 03:42:31 PM Page 3 of 7 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert J3.Simis n, or 6-17-2025 L% VE ID"'1,J ttest by is John ` n�, i "Clerk 6-17-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) 6-17-2025 This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. CHARLENT7774Y COMMISSION No. 67390 Notary Signature T' 8 NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Exp s: 3-28-202 STATE OF IDAHO Water Main Easement Page 3 Instrument # 2025-041684 07/02/2025 03:42:31 PM Page 4 of 7 VEOLIA WATER MAHO,INC. TE OF MAHO ) V ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me onlAsA 1""!1L�(date) by %vi lWnrrs (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative ca achy, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Nfe"k �1,,:,, (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: tuna% 'ke5;4or%A (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp�.,1118.44Maw �,-�/l t C�a►k.Q-�0'►'� •,. �••g°Zo� �'a; Notary ftnature N: My Commission Expires:Oti-ita-g l a QUBL'Lie•••o4t2gNN•''••�•0 #";N OF VD Water Main Easement Page 4 Instrument # 2025-041684 07/02/2025 03:42:31 PM Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A WATER EASEMENT 01 FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO An easement located in the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 9,Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian,and being a part of PARCEL A as shown on Record of Survey No. 14111,recorded as Instrument No. 2023-052123 in the office of the Recorder, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap monument marking the southwesterly corner of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4,from which an aluminum cap monument marking the southeasterly corner of said Section 9 bears S 89°14'44" E a distance of 2702.81 feet; Thence S 89°14'44" E along the southerly boundary of said SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 a distance of 1068.52 feet to a point on the extension of the westerly boundary of PARCEL B of said Record of Survey No. 14111; Thence leaving said southerly boundary N 0°40'35" E along said extension a distance of 42.00 feet to a point marking the southwesterly corner of said PARCEL B, said point being on the northerly right-of-way of E. Franklin Road; Thence S 89°14'44" E along the southerly boundary of said PARCEL B and said northerly right-of-way a distance of 60.00 feet to a point marking the southeasterly corner of said PARCEL B, said point being the southwesterly corner of said PARCEL A; Thence leaving said southerly boundary and said northerly right-of-way N 0°40'35" E along the westerly boundary of said PARCEL A a distance of 35.00 feet to a point marking the northwesterly corner of that existing water easement as described in Instrument No. 2023-007825; Thence along the northerly boundary of said water easement the following described courses: Thence S 89014'44" E a distance of 12.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing S 89014'44" E a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly boundary N 0°45'16" E a distance of 5.00 feet to a point; Thence N 89014'44"W a distance of 20.00 feet to a point; Instrument # 2025-041684 07/02/2025 03:42:31 PM Page 6 of 7 Page 1 of 2 Thence S 0°45'16 W a distance of 5.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 100 square feet(0.002 acres)and is subject to any other easements,existing or in use. Prepared by: Kyle A. Koomler, PLS Civil Survey Consultants LA s January 21,2025 NS 18780 r 1,7 Of !FA. KO S Page 2 of 2 Instrument # 2025-041684 07/02/2025 03:42:31 PM Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT B SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY WATER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION FOR THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO LOCATED IN THE Sly 1/4 OF THE SE I/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, 114 IDAHO �. 4z oo' N O'40 35"E PA SCALE.- 1 r4O' d PARCEL B (� RECORD OF SURREY NO. 14111 I W � o EXISTING WATER EASEMENT N POINT OF 1NST.NO. 2023-007825 BEGINNING -� N 0'40'.15"E 04516 "a 35.00' P/L W m 12.60' � W o POINT OF BEGINNING $ h ^, EASEMENT I N SEE DETAIL = w o 3 w t C9 q 35,.00' t7 NI N ©45'1cn 6' Eli�I, PARCEL A tl� RECORD OF SURVEY ZkI ° NO. 14111 (� 5.00' N M'16'£ � g ti DETAIL W SCALE LA S N 18780 CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANTS, INC. 16 9 2893 SOUTH MERIDIAN ROAD • MERIDIAN, IDAHO 83642 15 10 (208)888-4312 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Western States Equipment Water Main Easement Release (ESMT-2025-0057) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037875 Boise,Idaho Pgs=1 vbailey 06/18/2025 08:12:35 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded ESMT-2025-0057 Western States Equipment Water Main Easement FULL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED: Water Main GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTOR: Tertelin4 Trust#7 INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated July 11 , 2008 and recorded as Instrument Number 108097650 in the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, over and across the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS, the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby vacate, relinquish, release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 17th day of June 2025. CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis F",d 6-17-2025 f IDJAN � SF.it. Attest by Ch A s Johnson,City Clerk 6-17-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-17-2025(date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. C HARLE N E WAYS COMMISSION No. 67390 Notary Signature NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires:_3-28-2028_ STATE OF IDAHO Version 01/01/2020 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Frontline Subdivision Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0063) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037873 Boise,Idaho Pgs=11 vbailey 06/18/2025 08:12:35 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Project Name or Subdivision Name: Electronically Recorded Frontline Subdivision Water Main Easement Number: Identity this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See Instructions/checkrist for additbnal Information. For Internal use Only ESMT-2025-0063 Record Number: WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 17th day of June 20 25 between Watson Land Holdings and TM Cooley LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS,the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described;and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor,and other good and valuable consideration,the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities,together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right ofaccess to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance,Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement,including,but not limited to,buildings,trash enclosures, carports, sheds,fences,trees,or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of,or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. [END OF TEXT; SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW] Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTOR: WATSON LAND HOLDINGS LLC an Idaho limited liability company By: Brighton Corporation, an Idaho corporation, Manager By: C4 Robert L. Phillips, President STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this4'%day of June, in the year 2025, before me a Notary Public of said State, personally appeared Robert L. Phillips, known or identified to me to be the President of Brighton Corporation, the corporation that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said company, and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. a4l'�- C/L 44t, Notary Public for Idaho SHARI VAUGHAN My Commission Expires: �� a COMMISSION#20181002 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 06/01/2030 GRANTOR: TM COOLEY LLC an Idaho limited liability company By: SCS Management LLC, Manager Michael A. Hall, President STATE OF IDAHO ) ss. County of Ada ) On this / day of June, in the year 2025, before me a Notary Public of said State, personally appeared Michael A. Hall, known or identified to me to be the President of SCS Management LLC, the company that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said company, and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho // DONNA WILSON My Commission Expires: —W COMMISSION 4-6767zi NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN RobertE. Simison, Mayor 6-17-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-17-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) 6-17-2025 This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 km E N G I N E E R I N G June 4,2025 Frontline Subdivision Project No.22-061 City of Meridian Water Easement Legal Description Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Water Easement over a portion of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Frontline Subdivision(Book 124 of Plats,Pages 19876-19879),situated in the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 14,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a found aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 14,which bears N89°13'12"W a distance of 2,657.79 feet from a found aluminum cap marking the Northeast corner of said Section 14; Thence following the northerly line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4,S89°13'12"E a distance of 364.73 feet; Thence leaving said northerly line,S00°46'48"W a distance of 124.82 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 1. Thence S89°13'12"E a distance of 200.40 feet; Thence N00°46'48"E a distance of 21.33 feet; Thence S89°13'12"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence S00°46'48"W a distance of 21.33 feet; Thence S89°13'12"E a distance of 273.49 feet to an existing Sanitary Sewer and Water Easement per Instrument No.2022-011569; Thence following said existing easement the following two(2)courses: 1. S00°46'48"W a distance of 19.18 feet; 2. S89°13'12"E a distance of 18.01 feet; Thence leaving said existing easement,S00°46'48"W a distance of 12.06 feet; Thence N89°13'12"W a distance of 20.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as POINT"A"; Thence N00*46'48"E a distance of 11.24 feet; Thence N89°13'12"W a distance of 471.91 feet; Thence S00°46'48"W a distance of 148.93 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as POINT"B"; Thence N89°13'12"W a distance of 14.96 feet to an existing City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement per Instrument No.2022-029340; Thence following said existing easement the following two(2)courses: 1. N00°40'10"E a distance of 19.02 feet; 2. N89°19'50"W a distance of 5.01 feet; Thence leaving said existing easement,N00°46'48"E a distance of 149.92 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 1. Said parcel contains 13,428 square feet,more or less. 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939 • kmengllp.com TOGETHERWITH: Commencing at a point previously referred to as POINT"A'; Thence S03°26'W'W a distance of 89.07 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 2. Thence S89°13'12"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence S00°46'48"W a distance of 31.12 feet to said existing Sanitary Sewer and Water Easement per Instrument No.2022-011569; Thence following said existing easement the following two(2)courses: 1. N89°13'12"W a distance of 13.89 feet; 2. S00°4648"W a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence leaving said existing easement,N89013'12"W a distance of 6.11 feet; Thence N00'46'48"E a distance of 51.12 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 2. Said parcel contains 745 square feet,more or less. TOGETHERWITH: Commencing at a point previously referred to as POINT"B"; Thence S34°36'47"W a distance of 34.28 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 3. Thence N89°13'12"W a distance of 20.00 feet to said existing City of Meridian Sewer and Water Easement per Instrument No.2022-029340; Thence following said existing easement the following two(2)courses: 1. N00°4648"E a distance of 17.45 feet; 2. S89°19'50"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence leaving said existing easement,S00°46'48"W a distance of 17.49 feet to POINT OF BEGINNING 3. Said parcel contains 349 square feet,more or less. Said description contains a total of 14,522 square feet,more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. All subdivisions,deeds,records of surveys,and other instruments of record referenced herein are recorded documents of the county in which these described lands are situated. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. \aNpL LANOS \,,CIE N S£10 G V*� a o a 6 LP 3`� 9pF OF `aP e�<< HYNS^�� G/ q/ZU2q PAGE 2 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT a ALUMINUM CAP ALUMINUM CAP y NORTH 1/4 CORNER W. Franklin Road NORTHEAST CORNER Y C SECTION 14 BASIS OF BEARING SECTION 14 C u 11 ♦_ _ — — — — N89'13'12"W 2657.79' 11 12 N Q 14 364.73' I 2293.06' 14 13 F 3Iw a v N 2 v I 1O N O d' 00 I •O ut O C f13 N}C4 I J W U �� Qj c 2 P.O.B. 1 - m o w — S89'13'12"E 200.40' —�� ��— ———S89'13'12"E 273.49' m ° < 0' ————————— ————————————tR\\ u o vw o I C L _g- ° cc x — ————————————— �N �I N89'13'12"W 471.91' X m (IfI o 0 o Q N I I rn I POINT "A„ L7 \ W � CO 0 3 00 0 I I LOT 1, o U N I S03'26'00"WZ= BLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 doz `pw ¢ 89.07 (TIE) �I 0 1-W Z 3 p l I'? � I\ O o an z w v)a z I t o P.O.B. 2�1Lly 4' c ti I• N r i L1 1 I oT mJ L14 `o v /L211/L9 POINT "B" Plan Scale:1"=80' IZ ��� CL o CN L18 (TIE) EXISTING SANITARY L1 v 0 I 19-i_� C L22 SEWER AND WATER P.O.B. 3 EASEMENT PER Y No. 2022-0115691569 K z wro DATE: TUNE,7025 w E LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE PROJECT: 72-061 3 LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE SHEET: OF 1 m Lt NOO'46'48"E 21.33' L7 N89'13'12"W 20.00' L13 S00'46'48'W 31.12' L19 N89'13'12"W 20.00' vi L2 S89'13'12"E 20.00' L8 N00'46'48"E 11.24' L14 N89'13'12"W 13.89' L20 N00'46'48"E 17.45' L3 S00'46'48"W 21.33' L9 N89'13'12"W 14.96' L15 SOO'46'48"W 20.00' L21 S89'19'50"E 20.00' L4 S00'46'48"W 19.18' L10 N00'40'10"E 19.02' L16 N89'13'12"W 6.11' L22 S00'46'48"W 17.49' 8 L5 S89'13'12"E 18.01' L11 N89'19'50"W 5.01' L17 N00'46'48"E 51.12' E N G I N E E R I N G 5]25 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY BOISE,IDAHO 83713 L6 S00'46'48"W 12.06' L12 S89'13'12"E 20.00' L18 S34-36'47"W 34.28 PHONE 12O8I 6396939 kmengllp.com 1 200.40 273.49 s89°13'12"e s89°13'12"e n89°13'12"w 471.91 0�< u N � p 7 Q �3 o? a c.o � oQQ d' Yn - UZ., Title: Date: 06-04-2025 Scale: 1 inch=80 feet File: Tract 1: 0.308 Acres: 13428 Sq Feet:Closure=s88.1156e 0.02 Feet: Precision=1/85470: Perimeter=1427 Feet 001=s89.1312e 200.40 007=s89.1312e 18.01 013=n89.1312w 14.96 002=n00.4648e 21.33 008=s00.4648w 12.06 014=n00.4010e 19.02 003=s89.1312e 20.00 009=n89.1312w 20.00 015=n89.1950w 5.01 004=s00.4648w 21.33 010=n00.4648e 11.24 016n00.4648e 149.92 005=s89.1312e 273.49 011=n89.1312w 471.91 006=s00.4648w 19.18 012=s00.4648w 148.93 20.00 s89°13'12"e 3 C N Q �C o M O O m U GO N 7 N � C] C nM3'12"w 13.89 3 to g C p7 N O n n99°IY121" 6.11 Title: Date: 06-04-2025 Scale: 1 inch= 10 feet File: Tract 1: 0.017 Acres: 745 Sq Feet:Closure=n00.0000e 0.00 Feet: Precision>1/999999: Perimeter= 142 Feet 001=s89.1312e 20.00 004=s00.4648w 20.00 002=s00.4648w 31.12 005=n89.1312w 6.11 003=n89.1312w 13.89 006=n00.4648e 51.12 i 20.00 s89°19'50"e u 3 00 n c 00 c v v � o P n89°13'12"w 20.00 Title: Date: 06-04-2025 Scale: 1 inch=5 feet File: Tract 1: 0.008 Acres: 349 Sq Feet:Closure=n02.1738e 0.00 Feet: Precision=1/53174: Perimeter= 75 Feet 001=n89.1312w 20.00 003=s89.1950e 20.00 002=n00.4648e 17.45 004=s00.4648w 17.49 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Aviation Subdivision Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025- 0064) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037865 Boise,Idaho Pgs=8 vbailey 06/18/2025 08:01:18 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Aviation Subdivision ESMT-2025-0064 SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this_17th day of_June_2025 between MESA AVIATOR PARK LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. T O HAVE AND T O HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said parties ofthe first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Mesa Aviator Park LLC 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss County of Orange ) This r=4 was acknowledged before me on O` 03laoas (date) by (name of individual), [complete the fol owing ifsigning in a representative capacity, or strike the following ifsigning in an individual capacitv] on behalf of ft. Aularoe PAaK UC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: _ Member (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below JASON w000in c a ��nxn Notary gnature N0EMOPANN Y KOM�N My C nmission _III 134aoa-V l� ►y cam.E►w► m I as mm Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easetnent Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 6-17-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-17-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-17-2025 Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Exhibit A Sewer and Water Easements Aviation Subdivision May 31, 2025 Sewer Easement 1 A portion of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 9 and 10 bears North 0038'55" East, 2653.02 feet; thence North 19001'29" East, 1570.96 feet to the east boundary line of Hensley Station Subdivision No. 2 as filed Book 121 of Plats at Pages 19058 through 19060, records of Ada County, Idaho and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence on said east boundary line, North 00036'35" East, 20.00 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, South 89058'37" East, 158.29 feet; thence 23.44 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet, a central angle of 24025'12" and a long chord which bears South 30°44'33"West, 23.26 feet; thence North 89058'37" West, 146.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 3,030 square feet, more or less. AND Sewer and Water Easement 2 A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 9 and 10 bears North 0038'55" East, 2653.02 feet; thence North 44041'50" East, 1511.21 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 69059'17" East, 28.47 feet; �N thence South 35001'37" East, 12.43 feet; h,L L ANDg� ���ENs s�iG thence North 89015'50"West, 33.89 feet to the POINT `� OF BEGINNING. 11779 Containing 171 square feet, more or less. N� Ij/�ZSP �0 � FoF \� O) AND OyM MCCN Page 1 of 2 Water Easement 3 A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 9 and 10 bears North 0038'55" East, 2653.02 feet; thence North 48055'38" East, 1631.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00044'10" East, 52.00 feet; thence 19.61 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 455.00 feet, a central angle of 02028'11" and a long chord which bears North 83037'12" East, 19.61 feet; thence South 02040'03" East, 18.01 feet; thence North 87028'08" East, 19.50 feet; thence South 00044'10" West, 37.56 feet; thence North 89015'50" West, 40.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1,806 square feet, more or less. End of Description. oNK. L ANC g� �.\GENSs 1 11779 0 un I �0 �T F O F YM MC , Page 2 of 2 1/4 • S.9 S.10 Union. Pacific Railroad I I I I �N o d w� d CO o 44 O d ? O S89'58'37"E 158.29' W. Topeka St. N00'36'35"E��%l [�[%lL�[� �61 20.00' N89'58'37"W 146.61' Point of N I Beginning 1 > O I a C+M I0_ U l(� N m W U o o� o ; m N M1 m Z I m 1 Z Z 0)0. ^CY h I � . Curve Table I ,N o ; Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length o� 2 C1 23.44' 55.00' 24*25'12" S30'44'33"W 23.26' I I ; S��NP` LA NS s. G o a 11779 I / (0 s311-za r 0 •• COpgpF OF ��Pp? N S.9 S.10 W. Franklin Rd. f'M M� Scale: s.1s•s.15 - - - McCP 010 30 60 120 P:\Aviotlon Sub 21-296\dwg\Woter_Sewer Eose Eshibit.dwg 5/31/2025 12:29:08 PM IDAHO Exhibit B Job No. 21—296 9939 W.EMERALD ST. Sewer Easement SURVEY 80 SE,IDAHO 83704 Aviation Subdivision Sheet No. (208)846-8570 1 of 3 GROUP, LLC A portion of the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 10, Dwg. Date 13N., RAW., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho 5/31/2025 1/4 S.9 • S.10 I i Line Table Line Bearing Length L1 N69'59'17"E 28.47' I L2 S35'01'37"E 12.43' I L3 N89'15'50"W 33.89' i i i 2 I � . o I %X1 C n I 09�� ,L 9 y N O m V St• otot o in Pv` in O w' C Im I mC IZ Z Point of Beginning 2 L3 I I I NAB LA/y0 11779 �'�5�3[�®?Pip YM McCPM� N Scale: 1"=60' S.9 •5.10 W. Franklin Rd. S.16 S.15 0 10 30 60 120 P:\Aviation Sub 21-296\dwg\Water_Sewer Ease ExhibR.dwg 5/31/2025 12:29:23 PM DAHO Exhibit B Job No. 21-296 9939 W.EMERALD ST. Water Main and Sewer Easement Sheet 6 SURVEY ( o. 08) 4-8570 704 Aviation Subdivision (208)846-8570 2 of 2 GROUP, LLC A portion of the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 10, Dwg. Date T.3N., RAW., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho 5/31/2025 1/4 • S.9 5.10 Curve Table Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C2 19.61' 455.00' 2'28'11" N83'37'12"E 19.61' I I Line Table Line Bearing Length L4 N00'44'10"E 52.00' I L5 S02'40'03"E 18.01' I L6 N87'28'08"E 19.50' L7 S00'44'10"W 37.56' I L8 N89'15'50"W 40.00' I I Z o I °k yob C M I ly9i N N O o w P�\a<Or St C2 L5 n 0 I m f� �L6 I M � Z Z J J L8 I I Point of Beginning 3 NNL LA/y� I �6 ••' ��O EN S =-- - ��C S 11779 X � NJq����jdZ��O opyTF of M. MCCAN` S.9 S. N Scale: 1"=60' • W. Franklin Rd_ _ — S.16 S.15 0 10 30 60 120 R\Aviation Sub 21-296\dwg\Water_Sewer Ease Exhibit.dwg 5/31/2025 12:29:37 PM IDAHO Exhibit B Job No. 21-296 9939 W.EMERALD ST. Water Main Easement SURVEY (BOI20SE4-8570 704 Aviation Subdivision Sheet No. (208)646-8570 3 of 3 GROUP, L LC A portion of the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 10, Dwg. Date T.3N., R.1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho 5/31/2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Apex Phenomenal (FP-2025-0005), by Brighton Corporation, generally located 1/2 mile east of S. Meridian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of E. Lake Hazel Rd. STAFF REPORTCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING 06/17/2025 DATE: TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner sallen@meridiancity.org SUBJECT: Apex Phenomenal—FP,PS FP-2025-0005 T �-�LOCATION: Generally located 1/2 mile east of S. ---- Merdian Rd./SH-69 on the north side of Legend E.Lake Hazel Rd.,in the SE 1/4 of Project Location - __ --- .---- Section 31,T.3N.,R.IE. Area of Impact t_ City Limits OAnalysis - ~ e I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of 64 building lots,11 common lots and 1 other lot for future development on 16.15-acres of land in the R-15 zoning district.A private street(S.Culmination Ln.)is also proposed to provide access for homes within the development from E.Phenomenal St. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Amanda McNutt,Brighton Corporation—2929 W.Navigator Drive,Suite 400,Meridian ID 83642 B. Owner: DWT Investments,LLC&SCS Investments,LLC—2929 W.Navigator Drive,Suite 400, Meridian ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III.STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2024-0041)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2.In order for the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase,and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Page 1 Because(there is no change to the number of buildable lots and the amount of common open space is Commented[BP1]:The Plat has changed slightly.S.Apex way the same,Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved is designated collector and after the approval of the plat the plat was redesigned with two additional common driveways to eliminate preliminary plat as required. direct lot access to the collector street.Has their also been a slight The proposed private street(S.Culmination Ln.)complies with the standards for such in UDC 11-3F- increase in open space as result of this change? 4 and is tentatively approved with this application.Within one(1)year of the date of final plat approval,the Applicant or owner shall complete the tasks specified in UDC 11-3F-3B in order to obtain final approval. Note:Alternative compliance(A-2025-0042)was previously approved to the standards in UDC H- 3A-7A.7,11-3B-12C1 and 11-3B-12C.2 for this development. IV.DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat Apex Farr(dated:7/8/24) M nWN03 UO3 ION-AUVMIM13W g 9 CCirC ill! I14 �li3iir �! , .�• ��� O ® i � �� (( 22222333551 9II�gN 11 r,0;5 Z�I Cy _mR ® i8 g Z _ M : a# Z Z r s o� W x � aa�� ` �"� III ►� � ee ff A" s Page 3 B. Final Plat(dated:5/20/25) i Io all F 99'a z>s'h" b" o q e • • s• ® C O I I g I �• `�MSm�� ® © p 5 o ® Z^"09 NIB J ig 0 Z 0p. 9 LU eb d z d I / &3434 1 tv. s ' I — � K all 'antl Ayw�l9^T'T b� f c C. Landscape Plan(dated:4/22/25) d a3AO7adV.KONVI J q'N NgSINOBOS NtlIOItl3WN3Hd%3dV N3WO fill R. 1a€e leis sspsgg �# �e gg� igias. a a i1€ei s r r r — i m¢ii E ixe R.�r a 6e9' �• yp..,p 1 r ai 9 M1 I9E 8g 6 9 �eErpr � Ei�9�� 1�: 9a p� gg e�"}*s €g gr x a r @�� q r rye f egz=1 @i" ��y �m! Beg° �Ri g1 g� �gai"i f gE EH,1,11 011$E$ ��ii IRE Ill 913 of #�E�!i 3!pi€Ia,i m 1ear @�f$b� 3�: 611��4Eie aped 3i @ "fir RR � s€! it � Eier� bR! � °�i s� it EE a is 6 g m!•!R E i` Sp r g " ra, a ! e i @@ E E �ga3 r r ! el "a a x 9 4€r e e p I e§ E'! °!ee 1' ,E`a�Ee "t a; !!i� c4e! r 'i ! ae �. g p • aa� �r�i i• €����iE Q��@�i �"! � � �rer i Ep I till gg@ E ! xr3a a ! ri gpx9i8 9E E xE1 i` C! 4 aae axi 1 y .l a6r r !, E gg! 3; .'axi"'" i e r g i p 6 . R E .i 5 !". !" ! € i a alaa p y a" @gee S9p i'S C pp e mr a 5"§ a[ i " p @"gg r� E i "$ ga €j° 895 ¢ i° €&4 gl" 9Ii a"ara_ 8 4� i 3 r , 4,i `.E f En y� i ! i E $ a i� m ir:. ee"Egk0°R a its m 1Rr' 'ia E p@ 3 eat€ 11 :?e p SaEi�F @a g. e arim j +!!!!°!!!! wis3gljtllE° ! '�eeaa ....... kk W i9• kk sFi �F m 51 61 i B� m !1 'c a � a a � � � � r !p i�:�� I—�•°p v �� • 1 it v �, a<i — -F z � g.-.a..uvers s a Page 5 33l . , a n s 01'NtlIUIN3W u ..III....NN3WON3Nd.3dV i 9 Y gg a�6�le'd € �.B as Y ! ffi3'='a#! �kg E a Y�; _ � ItoP s µs�eg8���ga5g� ,f d� C? C` 0 ID ® lII 4 I f ® k w Oii ® 1' impI •• I ¢ } t - 44 ® - h{ I , I it mlwww,v= ® I I I al I P- 'r• NVld 3dVJSONVI a 01'NMIN3W NOISINOaHSNN3WON3Hd%3dV 6 hry qq pp gg pp yy i i 3 i i Ml ppp SS s S Eli g� 11 lil It I i �I I c A 8e bill u� S a ---- „A M r Page 7 D. Emergency Access Exhibit J r,A _ ��... . tR * ! . r � .4 _ i I►r��i .p �p � �I i 'iI� ' • Nr VI.CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS&CONDITIONS A. Planning Division 1. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval of the approved annexation and preliminary plat(H-2020-0066 Apex),Development Agreement(Inst.#2020-178120)and alternative compliance(A-2025-0042)for this site. 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of City Council's approval of the preliminary plat(on or before December 17,2026)in accord with UDC 11-6B-7,in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid;or,a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by KM Engineering,dated:05/20/2025,included in Section V.B shall be revised as follows: a. Note#11:Include S.Sublimity Ave. b. Note#13:Include the recorded instrument number of the water and sewer main easement. c. Note#17:Include the recorded instrument number of the ACED temporary license agreement. A copy of the revised plat shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 5. The landscape plan prepared by KM Engineering,dated 05/24/2024,included in Section V.C, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a variety of trees,shrubs,lawn,or other vegetative ground cover within the required street buffers along E.Lake Hazel Rd.,Apex Ave.and S.Sublimity Ave.,that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3.See standards for more details. A copy of the revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat for City Engineer signature. 6. Off-street parking is required to be provided for all residential units in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 7. Homes within the development shall be generally consistent with the building elevations referenced in the Development Agreement(Inst.#2020-178120). 8. Prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer,the applicant shall provide a letter from the United States Postal Service stating that the applicant has received approval for the location of mailboxes.Contact the Meridian Postmaster,Matthew Peterson,at 208-887-1620 or Matthew.W.Peterson(a usps.Qov for more information. 9. All required street buffers shall be installed with development of the subdivision,including those on Lot 76,Block 1. 10. Address signage shall be provided at the alley entrances off the public streets for homes that don't have frontage on a public street.Address numbers shall also be provided on the rear of structures visible from the alley for emergency responders. 11. All single-family attached units shall comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual.A design review application shall be submitted for approval of the proposed structures prior to submittal of building permit applications. Page 9 12. Development shall incorporate high quality architectural design and materials and thoughtful site design to ensure quality of place consistent with the Comprehensive Plan(see pg.3-10)per the development agreement. 13. The rear and/or side of structures on lots that face E.Lake Hazel Rd.(i.e.Lots 41-50 and 52-59, Block 1)and S.Apex Ave.(i.e.Lots 13, 16,40 and 41,Block 1)shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following:modulation(e.g.projections,recesses,step- backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public street.Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 14. The proposed private street(i.e.S.Culmination Ln.)is tentatively approved with this application. Within one(1)year of the date of final plat approval,the Applicant or owner shall complete the tasks specified in UDC 11-M-313 in order to obtain final approval. 15. Staff's failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Centrepointe Apartments (H-2025- 0009) by Mike Maffia, MGM Meridian 2, located at 3100 Centrepointe Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. CITY OF MERIDIAN -: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW E AND DECISION DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Development Agreement modification,by Mike Maffia,MGM2. Case No(s). H-2025-0009 For the City Council Hearing Date of: June 3,2025 (Findings on June 17,2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3, 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code (LC. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance,established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -1- reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for a Development Agreement modification is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner,and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-513-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two (2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -2- City Code Title I I(UDC 11-5B-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted,including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10,seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d)and 67-8003,an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of June 3,2025 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 17th day of June,2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-17-2025 Attest: Chris Johnson 6-17-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 6-17-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CENTREPOINT APARTMENTS MDA-H-2025-0009) -4- EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING April 22, 2025 continued to Legend DATE: May 13, June 3,2025 �J Project Location Area of Impact ,= - TO: Mayor&City Council i= City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 �" " < 1. lritter@meridiancity.org - r APPLICANT: Mike Maffia,MGM2 SUBJECT: H-2025-0009 r ^� ------ Centrepoint Apartments MDA _ LOCATION: 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Lane,located in the NE'/4 of -- Section 5,Township 3N,Range I �- (Parcel(s)# S 1105110111 and S1105110120) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project approval that was received in 2022 (H-2022-0072)with the modification to the existing Development Agreement(Instrument No. 2022-079000) for the existing 11.17 acres. The modification will create two(2)new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. B. Issues/Waivers In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project that was previously approved in 2022 (H-2022-0072). C. Recommendation Recommend approval of the proposed Development Agreement modification. D. Decision Approved with conditions City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1•Land Use Description Details Mal)Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-Family Residential and Commercial - Existing Zoning C-G VI.A.2 Proposed Zoning C-G Adopted FLUM Designation MU-R VI.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation MU-R Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 1/28/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 2/25/2025 Site posting date 4/3/2025 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Centrepoint Apartments MDA H-2025-0009 (copy this link into a separate browser). Table 3:Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2018-0121 (Villasport CUP,MDA);H-2021-0006(CUP),H-2022-0035 (MDA,DA Inst.#2022-079000);H-2024-0019(ALT,CUP,MDA)—this application was approved but the applicant terminated their entitlement rights;TED-2023-0002;TEC-2025-0001 Phasing Plan None Residential Units 213 multi-family units-One(1)two-story building and five(5)3-story buildings Open Space 6.78 acres(295,401 s.f.)of qualified open space proposed according to the open space exhibit(approximately 40%). Amenities At a minimum, 13 amenities are proposed—See the amenity Exhibit in Section VII below. Physical Features The Milk Lateral has previously been piped and there is a thirty(30)foot irrigation easement that goes through the property. Acreage 11.17 Lots 2 Density Gross—21.3 du/ac. City of Meridian Department Report IL Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject application encompasses two(2)parcels located south of E. Ustick Road(Parcels S 1105110111 and S 1105110120. Parcel S 1105110111 was part of a Development Agreement Modification and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)application in 2019 that removed the subject parcel from an existing Development Agreement(DA) for the purpose of entering into a new DA with a new conceptual plan and building elevations(H-2018-0121,DA Inst. #2019-060877)and a request for a new athletic club and spa(indoor recreation facility),Villasport. The CUP approval for the indoor recreation facility has since expired and the property was sold. The current CUP and DA(H-2022-0035 DA Inst#2022-079000)was approved to construct a mixed-use development consisting of commercial space and a 213-unit multi-family development in lieu of an athletic club/spa and commercial building. In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. B. Development Agreement Modification The applicant is requesting the following changes to the Development Agreement: • Parcel E(3100 Centrepoint Way) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments shall be constructed and vegetated with the residential phase of development along E.Ustick Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the residential phase—Parcel E of development. • Parcel F (3030 N. Cajun Lane) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway along N. Eagle Road will be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel—Parcel F. C. Staffs Analysis Staff has no objection to the Applicant's request for a modification to the existing development agreement(H-2021-0103,Inst. 92022-066859)to create two(2)new development agreements so that each parcel can develop independently. On December 3,2024,the City Council approved findings for H02024-0019 for modifications to the existing Development Agreement(DA)H-2022-0035 and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)H- 2022-0072 to facilitate the construction of a 239-unit multifamily affordable apartment project. This proposal strictly pertains to the residential component of the approved development plan. The applicant also requested alternative compliance for the to the open space and parking lot landscaping. In January of 2025,that applicant terminated the entitlements and withdrew their application for the Centrepoint Apartments project(H-2024-0019 ALT,CUP,MDA)due to complications at the State level with project financing. An administrative time extension(TED- 2023-0002)was approved for a two-year period in April of 2023. Prior to the expiration date of April 1,2025,the applicant submitted an application for an additional two-year During the review process for H-2024-0019,ITD required the applicant to dedicate twelve (12) feet of right-of-way on Eagle Road and reconstruct the right turn lane to Seville Lane. The current DA requires the landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments to be constructed and vegetated with the first phase of development along E.Ustick Road and N. Eagle Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the first phase of development. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis The applicant is proposing to create two development agreements for the following reasons: • To allow landscape street buffers and pathways along E.Ustick Road as well as the 25- foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries to be developed with the residential development on Parcel E. E. Ustiek Read are insta4led no later-gian a yeai-7 after-appr-&val of the development agfeement medifiea4ien as this is�he final fnissiiig 14+k leadiiig up to Eagle Read. • To allow the landscape buffer and pathway along N. Eagle Road to be constructed with the commercial development on Parcel F. Therefore,each parcel owner will be responsible for the improvements outlined in each of their development agreements. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. Development Agreement Modification(Parcel E—Multi-family): 1.1 The modified Development Agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council approval of the Findings. The Development Agreement shall,at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of the site shall be substantially consistent with the submitted concept plan and color renderings included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. Future development of Parcel E shall comply with the standards outlined in the multi-family development specific use standards,UDC 11-4-3-27. c. All future pedestrian crossings that traverse shared drive aisles within the development shall be constructed with brick,pavers, stamped concrete,or colored concrete to clearly delineate the driving surface from the pedestrian facilities,per UDC 11-3A-19B.4b. d. The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segment shall be constructed and vegetated with the€rrst residential phase of development along E. Ustick Road and N. Eagle R,,..a;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the&4 residential phase of development. e. Applicant shall work with ACHD to construct a safe pedestrian crossing from the central multi-family site area to the parking lot along the west boundary across N. Centrepoint Way. f. With the future Conditional Use Permit for the multi-family development,the building along the west boundary shall be no more than two-stories in height and the three (3)buildings within the center of the project shall be no more than three- stories in height,consistent with the Applicant's revised concept plan and presentation to Council. g. Applicant shall continue the masonry wall along the west property boundary consistent with adjacent development and help buffer the proposed project. h. Staff and Applicant shall work with ACHD to mark Centrepoint Way as no- parking on both sides,should ACHD allow it. i. is to Eagle Read-. j. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions Development Agreement 42 (Parcel F -Commercial): a. Future development of the site shall be generally consistent with the submitted concept plan included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. The required landscape street buffers,multi-use pathway,and decorative lighting along N. Eagle Road shall be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel. c. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. d. Applicant shall work with ITD regarding right-of-way dedication and the proposed improvements to Eagle Road. B. Meridian Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Water is about 200ft from the Property boundary for parcel S 1105110120. 2. Any changes to public water infrastructure must be approved by public works. 3. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 4. Provide 20'Easements for mains,hydrant laterals and water services. Easements should extend up to the end of main/hydrant/water meter and 10'beyond it. 5. No permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls,fences, infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)to be built within the utility easement. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department. 2. Per Meridian City Code (MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). Sewer/water easement varies depending on sewer depth. Sewer 0-20 ft deep require a 30 ft easement,20-25 ft a 40 ft easement,and 25-30 ft a 45 ft easement. Ensure no permanent structures (trees,bushes, buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)are built within the utility easement. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions 5. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development,and if so,how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at ht!p://www.meridiancily.org/public works.aMx?id=272. 19. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 20. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. Meridian Park's Department https://weblink.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo MeridianCit Y- D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) hyps://weblink.meridiancity.oMg/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X E. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X V. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested Development Agreement Modification per the conditions of approval included in Section IV. B. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on June 3,2025.At the public hearing.the Council moved to approve the subject Development Agreement modification requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Mike Maffia-Applicant, Jeff Vrba b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Jeff Vrba d. Written testimony:None C. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Idaho Transportation Department required improvements to Eagle Road as The Eagle Road and Ustick Road intersection is the busiest intersection in the State of Idaho. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action � 1 1 Locationcog ct Analysis � of Impact MIN } Ell F. M' ' 1 77 r � r s uJ Legend ,' �■ nulls �uw. vuul� Project Location ��t■����� �nnm �,�uuun■g1111�� I 1r��` w:�` ••1tt•■ % iiniiiii:1111f \r111��ii �In 7 ,� _•�omu�i■■m w�1.111��Il♦1:::: ♦ vn4■ • Area :o�i ���•C►i ones _ Analysis HIM gas nm •■ nr nnnu n■. 1 w•mm�fill IIIIIIIIIII - - IIIDunn � � i mill •p'■q�•u ■��-i. - 111111111111•/ n III ZZ ♦♦�♦�� � 111::1111: ♦♦�♦♦ems"% '� ' 111::IIIIC •�♦�. ■r� Pnm •nw un.�l m\3 ��'`I un uuu uR.rimm �i:�im wul nm�n� ■■ �i�•':::�n�.. W I 1111„�i r.fi■■ti.■ilrnu J / n unuu■-uuun E§ ""„ ■ uuunu■■li��=ou ■uuilGm nrw►►Autil.1► ly ■■■�1� pan■n Ilp•■■■I.1l�R�.. • .u■ V • nqi■-u■ •. 1 Project Location • - • o I. 1�iom■..!♦onuu►■11111 �t1111■:u II.i1I\��.i�f ■'� �� /..w u■��III/�III>I.11 _a of Impact sellspoll - .T soon 0Analysis -G��1i4jig1� uuuuwum -nia.Offic� �i=■���•' ,""1 WWAAM ON ON EM ON in Nip own ►�1■ /�I�Vun►�Qn 11/uunn-.1 _ :nnu ,,p.::ug0►p`����� ■■u■■p�q/� uluu■uai_ �Iu11►�.►0�\►11j►4•�:i�NOR►������ ■.��1 I\��f� Off .i._ i�� �►i•\\iA kill 1n11C--- Was .u►�� a 9►`��� ��.w o nu:w.� �� .�■. n.411npu.� .■m I■■1 � m r p '�nllllll W m 11 ■■. /1.1111 1::-_III ■ 1■'.I ii 1�1�1�1 �=lilt �rnlOumn maw. us- �uflllll ����`■ I�p�lugp►. O uO� loo ► n■ , IIIIIIIIIIIINi n ♦ pool. 1 nw lilt.. n1•n: Iunn......as �,�■ p`-'�::�:�: ►��:::::.■f♦♦Its♦♦♦• lilt. ■m -some I u■■r/.D be-►u, Legend 11=;r/ ■M�I.II���I,I�I�►_���::�■>,iu��•����Im`or� �i_■inn■U / iiuiw►.l.l11O111l"�'�rc1n uuu.uA . E�. s 11 Project —nnu.. m iI.p.um■u�Ic111�II�11111 ,.� •��nil•== --_ ... �_':_�1��•Ij�4i1� uuumunnu 1••1{ 'oiinwil=I���, �" ♦ �..... �nnu.► ■ ■..jam�•�:en�� �:•♦♦i♦♦�•._��� /� i■ r���IJI�■■■ ,\■■■I�� Area of Impact ones I Beano City Limits mom Planned Parcels ./�Vum�► /u■n►►.:►1�=1,:. ...Ian ♦�.♦ . np�Q•i � � un... U..III►♦��� i 0 Analysis mnuu. �- ��� � olio����.�,..■�►I/1119in = a uaiY a ■■�1plr.f� iii i ►■= lL �■ :►�. � � ro�nm a .■.�' nu. ,�:y��.unu■�=nn--■4+ � r1■� . 1 _. r ■u o■■■Q.Pgp u. :GI=.� ,� � �'�$:'•.Bunn=_�►■.����r �i ��:_� �j ♦• 1.:��nn'aurG \__. �� i: _ � Pm.nn?p1•t � ��■� � nn■.:.= 0 nu. ■ ml n■nn.■ nunnul ugp11111 � � ,now np1. �� ��� ♦ 11111■ _ !M� f- ��ii .1 111111111111■/ 11 .nll.uu.: J�� V� ui.�e�:• {.Ip: �.:c lid. Inlnril •�♦Q♦. nu■u- . �: nll n1u1■.■_:-• IIIP 1�I i •i J nnnr�'.: I� '�ii1j111 i Cpll::� nud/.n non►um L\ -'-1 ■e�uu�l ■nnnuu pp/ nn■��Iii r:fi..i::�l�nu■■nn�■•�-y� W 'II uuv 1 m ,Lw■■nu�wllilG....n■I�"i..uL•I�11■ W ■u l■ ui pumas.uuw Ip►�nnnmm�umuu nqi.-m n ■ :��i��I�OP�map►JFaTTT B. Subject Site Photo 4 1 .� .v _ �- '' •._ «a,.,y;rd.. - '" ` s_ rx . .ram---' -.. '' _ City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits C. Approved Site Plan—Parcel E(date: 8/30/2022) SITE INFORE4�TEOr, LEGEND ---- ---- --- --------- CONCEPT SITE PLAN-CENTREPOINT Eagle A Uwdck Meridian,ID AUSUSt 3U,LOU aea=aaaae" Ku H= City of Meridian I Department Report V1. Exhibits 0 0 0 i e a o �8a�@Y�•4' �c��•'� F o gLfI j � SBN - 00 E. Approved Landscape Plan-Parcel E(date: 9/19/2022) caerrruarsaeeeu 4= LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CONCEPT LANSCAPE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT Eagle&Usdck Meridian,ID Kimley))Horn City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits Mo Om rtivxr I e iYltf�ti r�� tl�� - rr Approved Open Space and Amenity Exhibit—Parcel E(date: 9/19/2022) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ronu e�Anv, wwcw.sxeFl rn[µ bast/ .mow.[ .ru_i.r si VI1 FA�M L'I6i�au»n. ;I L, LI �1i1 brill I - it _ii_il — �I LJ r � I a � OPEN SPACE , CONCEPT OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT Eagle&Ustick Meridian,ID Kimley Morn City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits G. Approved Building Elevations—Parcel E (date: 8/30/2022) - - - - -- BUILDING A-EAST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING A-WEST ELEVATION S k BLM..JFPSRYJ' - &0 All --- TO o R11 III IV, III III l[aA-��Cn2`I I WN BUILDING A-SOUTH ELEVATION 2 n. I eT o� BUILDING A-NORTH ELEVATION 'I vie.=..-o. BUILDING A - ELEVATIONS AP0.30 2223-BUILDING A BOISE,ID DBIM22 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits ya# - -pi r 0.inPPa a00r -w-u PccP//.. o Ofuo� c.ffxi`I Ago B.P3C-RCGiI BID00 BUILDING D-WEST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING D-NORTH ELEVATION 2 v1a=r o• 1Hr-T-v t. c, ® ® ®_- ar -- — r �r BUILDING D-EAST ELEVATION 3 BUILDING D-SOUTH ELEVATION 1 BUILDING E ELEVATIONS AP0.34 2223-BUILDING E BOISE.ID 08/30/2022 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits f --- M I A4,. BUILDING V momNEIEVA7 4 BUILDING IF WEST ELEVATION 2 BULGING F.SOUTH ELEVATNNI 3 BUILDING F-EAST ELEVATION'I BUILDING F-ELEVATIONS AP0.35 2223-BUILDING F oor_o ce,mccc City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Temporary Right-of-Way Easement Between the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian at Apex Southeast Subdivision No. 3 (South Side of Discovery Park) (�M� IE N MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Consent Agenda From: Mike Barton, Parks &Recreation Meeting Date: June 17, 2025 Presenter: Consent Agenda Estimated Time: Consent Agenda Topic: Temporary Right of Way Easement Background: ACHD desires to obtain a temporary easement on property owned by the City on the south side of Discovery Park. This has been reviewed and approved by Legal. Council Action: Approved Temporary Easement as presented. SUBP21-0103 APEX Southeast Sub. No. 3 T.2N., R.1 E., Sec. 05 (space reserved for recording) TEMPORARY EASEMENT THIS TEMPORARY EASEMENT (the "Easement"), is made and entered into this day of , 2025, by and between City of Meridian hereinafter referred to as "GRANTOR," and ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT, a body politic and corporate of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "ACHD." WITNESSETH: FOR GOOD AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION, IT IS AGREED: SECTION 1. Recitals. 1.1 GRANTOR owns the real property located in Ada County, Idaho more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (hereinafter "Servient Estate"). 1.2 ACHD has jurisdiction over the public highways, including sidewalks, and public rights-of-way which adjoin and are adjacent to the Servient Estate (hereinafter the "Dominant Estate"). 1.3 ACHD desires to obtain a temporary easement on, over and across the Servient Estate for the purposes hereinafter described, and, for the consideration and on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, GRANTOR is willing to grant such temporary easement to ACHD. SECTION 2. Grant of Temporary Easement and Authorized Uses. GRANTOR hereby grants to ACHD a temporary exclusive easement over and across the Servient Estate for use by the public, including motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists, and the following uses and purposes: (a) placement of a Public Rights-of-Way as (as defined in Idaho Code, section 40-117); (b) construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance and placement of a Highway (as defined in Idaho Code, section 40-109) and any other facilities or structures incidental to the preservation or improvement of the Highway; (c) statutory rights of ACHD, utilities and irrigation districts to use the Highway and/or Public Right-of-Way. Temporary Easement - 1 (2/11/14) SECTION 3. Term. This Easement shall be for a term commencing on the date of the GRANTOR's execution of this Indenture and terminating on the earlier of the relocation the Highway and any other facilities or structures incidental to the preservation or improvement of the Highway from the Servient Estate. On the expiration of the term of this Easement, the rights and privileges granted to ACHD hereunder shall cease and terminate, and this Easement shall be null and void and of no further force and effect, and ACHD shall execute and record a Release of the Easement in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. SECTION 4. Covenants Run with the Land. During the term, the covenants shall run with the land. The Easement and the covenants and agreements made herein shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon, ACHD and GRANTOR, and Grantor's successors and assigns to the Servient Estate. SECTION 5. Appurtenant. The Easement herein granted is appurtenant to the Dominant Estate and a burden on the Servient Estate. SECTION 6. Maintenance. Upon acceptance of the Highway, ACHD shall maintain the physical integrity of this Easement in good condition and repair and as required to satisfy all requirements of applicable laws, the policies of ACHD and sound engineering practices. The repair and maintenance of the physical integrity of the Easement shall be at the sole cost and expense of ACHD; provided if the damage to the physical integrity of the Easement is as a result of the activities of GRANTOR, GRANTOR'S guests, invitees, contractors or agents, the repair shall be at the sole cost and expense of GRANTOR. This Section shall not release GRANTOR'S obligation to provide routine maintenance required under any applicable state or local law, ordinance or regulation as to the pedestrian facilities that may be placed on the Servient Estate. Temporary Easement - 2 (2/11/14) SECTION 7. Restoration on Expiration of Term. On the expiration of the terms of this Easement, the Servient Estate may be restored by GRANTOR at its sole cost and expense, to at least as good a condition as existing on the date of this Indenture. SECTION 8. Binding Effect. This Easement, and the covenant and agreements herein contained, shall, during the entire term hereof, be binding upon and inure to the benefit of (i) ACHD and GRANTOR, respectively, and their successors and assigns, and their respective interests in the Dominant and Servient Estates. SECTION 9. Indemnification. ACHD shall, subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, indemnify, save harmless and defend regardless of outcome GRANTOR from expenses of and against suits, actions, claims or losses of every kind, nature and description, including costs, expenses and attorney fees caused by or arising out of any negligent acts by the ACHD or the ACHD's officers, agents and employees while acting within the course and scope of their employment, which arise from or which are in any way out of ACHD's construction, use and maintenance on the Servient Estate. Any such indemnification hereunder by the ACHD is subject to the limitations of the Idaho Tort Claims Act (currently codified at chapter 9, title 6, Idaho Code). Such indemnification hereunder by the ACHD shall in no event cause the liability of the ACHD for any such negligent act to exceed the amount of loss, damages, or expenses of attorney fees attributable to such negligent act, and shall not apply to loss, damages, expenses, or attorney fees attributable to the negligence of GRANTOR. SECTION 10. Recordation. This Easement shall be recorded in the Official Real Property Records of Ada County, Idaho. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD this Easement unto the ACHD until the expiration of the term hereof. GRANTOR covenants to ACHD that ACHD shall enjoy the quiet and peaceful possession of the Servient Estate; and, GRANTOR warrants to ACHD that GRANTOR is lawfully seized and possessed of the Servient Estate and has the right and authority to grant this Easement to ACHD. Temporary Easement - 3 (2/11/14) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Easement to be executed the day, month and year first set forth above. CITY OF MERIDIAN _M Robert Simison 6-17-2025 ayor ATTEST: _ Chris Johnson 6-17-2025 City Clerk ACHD Ada County Highway District By: Its: President ATTEST: By: Ryan Head Its: Director The Ada County Highway District (ACHD) is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related regulations and directives. ACHD assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, gender, disability or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any ACHD service, program or activity. Temporary Easement - 4 (2/11/14) km E N G I N E E R I N G February 21,2025 Apex Southeast Subdivision No.3 Project No.21-025 Legal Description ACHD Temporary Turnaround Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a temporary turnaround easement being a portion of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest Corner of Section 5,Township 2 North, Range 1 East, B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-West 1/16 corner of said Section 5,which bears 589'52'38"E a distance of 1,329.65 feet from an aluminum cap marking the West 1/4 corner of Section 5; Thence following the westerly line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, N00°01'43"W a distance of 42.00 feet the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said westerly line, N00°01'43"W a distance of 27.48 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line, N89°58'17"E a distance of 13.34 feet; Thence 184.77 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 62.50 feet,a delta angle of 169'22'58",a chord bearing of S84°34'51"E and a chord distance of 124.46 feet; Thence 500'06'38"W a distance of 16.03 feet; Thence N89'52'39"W a distance of 137.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 8,478 square feet, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or rights- of-way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. AL �s 5 GIS� Q a �12459 OF ly'SON L. BAy 2. 2 l . ZdZS 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 • 208.639.6939• kmengllp.com E. Lake Hazel Rd. ALUMINUM CAP NW CORNER GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 5 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD 00 n N r) C1 62.50' 184.77' 169'22'58" S84'34'51"E 124.46' r o (D (D Proposed Apex N N c1 Southeast W ———— Subdivision No. 3 �IN, o / o City of Meridian V) / S1405212411 N89'58'17"E 13.34' / d Do S00'06'38"W r 16.03'� POINT OF BEGINNING ----- E. Via Roberto St. N89'52'39"W 137.20 TS0 - — o N BASIS OF BEARING S89'52'38"E 1329_65' — — — — — — — — rALUMINUM POINT OF COMMENCEMENT CAP 5/8-INCH REBAR 0 W 1/4 CORNER SECTION 5 CENTER-WEST 1/16 CORNER SECTION 5 s w LEGEND ® FOUND ALUMINUM CAP a QO FOUND 5/8" REBAR CALCULATED POINT ° — — — SECTION LINE — ROAD CENTERLINE - —— — — — — - EASEMENT LINE Z 0 40 80 120 LOT LINE a Plan Scale: 1" =40' 0 0 N 0 ti N E N G I N E E R I N G m 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY = BOISE,IDAHO83713 PHONE(208)639-6939 Exhibit B - ACHD Temporary Turnaround kmengllp.com Apex Southeast Subdivision No. 3 DATE: February 2025 PROJECr: 21-025 N SHEET: Situated in a portion of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of a 1 OF 1 Section 5, T2N, R1E, B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Core & Main H-2024-0066) Between City of Meridian and Core & Main LP for Property Located at 299 S. Black Cat Rd. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037882 Boise,Idaho Pgs=45 vbailey 06/18/2025 08:14:29 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Core & Main LP, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 1 Oth day of June ,2025,by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and Core & Main LP, whose address is 1830 Craig Park Court, Maryland Heights, MO 63146, hereinafter called OWNEWDEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the "Property"; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-5B-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer have submitted an application for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to change the future land use designation on 5.0 acres of land from Low-Density Employment(LDE)to Mixed Employment(M-E); and annexation and zoning of 5.0 acres of land with a request for the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district on the property as shown in Exhibit"A"under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and EVELOPMENT GREEMENT CO E&MAIN(H-2024-0066) PAGE 1 OF 7 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Core & Main LP, whose address is 1830 Craig Park Court, Maryland Heights, MO 63146, hereinafter called O"ER/DEVELOPER, the parry that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CoRE&MAIN(H-2024-0066) PAGE 2 of 7 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit`B" and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. c. The western entrance off of the future collector roadway shall be signed and used for truck traffic only. d. All existing structures shall be removed from the property within 90 days of the annexation approval. e. Comply with the architectural standards manual and Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP). f. Construct the collector roadway on the north boundary in accordance with the street section Exhibit C as listed in the TMISAP on pages 3-10 or to Ada County Highway District's (ACHD) standards prior to certificate of occupancy for the building. A cross-street exhibit shall be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CoRE&MA1N(H-2024-0066) PAGE 3 of 7 notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180)day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any parry hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. hi the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall,immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation, the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby,the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CORE&MAIN(H-2024-0066) PAGE 4 of 7 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Core & Main LP 1830 Craig Park Court Maryland Heights, MO 63146 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CoRE&MAIN(H-2024-0066) PAGE 5 of 7 expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property ("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time, provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property, which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 21. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: hi the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing rezoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; acknowledgements, signatures and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CoRE&MAIN(H-2024-0066) PAGE 6 of 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Core& Main LP By(name): Steve Frei urg Its (title): Construction Project Manager State of ft ) ss: County of ) On this C7 day of i& Lc- 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Publi-c in and fqr said State, personally appeared L, a c�(name),known or identified to me to be the -7,?/,&/-217S (title)of Core&Main LP and the person?Zo signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my han)ad ffixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Chrim", orU Lynn N0*WPuM1V4ftAgS0W No srAT90FA#S$Ck* My mts Fires: CommissJenad 1orRNb County My Commission Expires:January 20,2021 ID#ZM17580 CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk State of Idaho ) ss County of Ada ) On this 17th day of Tune , 2025, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—CORE&MAIN(H-2024-0066) PAGE 7 OF 7 EXHIBIT A • I DA H O 9939 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Description for Annexation-City of Meridian November 26, 2024 The following Describes a Parcel of Land being a Portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast Corner of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; From which, the Southeast Corner of the Northeast 1/4 (East 1/4 Corner) of said Section 16 bears, South 00043'00" West, 2,657.20 feet; Thence along the Easterly line of said Section 16, South 00043'00"West, 1328.55 feet to the North 1/16 corner the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said Easterly line and along the Southerly line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, North 89023'18" West, 494.31 feet; Thence leaving said Southerly line, North 00040'00" East, 384.50 feet; Thence, North 77028'00" East, 419.92 feet; Thence, South 89°1 T00" East, 85.90 feet to the Easterly line of said Section 16; Thence along said Easterly line, South 00043'00" West, 479.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above Described Parcel of Land contains 5.00 acres, more or less. 51 Page I of I W. Franklin Rd. S.9 S.10 5.16 S.15 S89'17'00"E cI 85.90' o N �� Za_00i 419' I I - Io N 1 p I pi I of M .` u? N N -q- I U�I m °ram° I Annexation Area o/I o o a w 5.00 Acres m K) r7'cn O 0 O0 I N l 0 Om o ) o z 1 1 I .. 1 N 1/16 S.16 N89'23'18"W 494.31' Point of � Beginning co 00 Legend Found Brass Cap Monument Q Found Aluminum Cap Monument 1 1 6 S.15 � Dimension Point g5�p��EN3H0 sG� S. ——— ——— Annexation Boundary Line I/�2(o/Z� o —— — Section Line a � Right—of—Way Line o— — — — — Parcel Line of RecordFiVCF OF ` ���= N Scale: 1"=100' Area of Dedicated Right—of—Way 0 25 50 100 200 P:\299 5. Black Cot Rd. 24-282\dwg\24_282 Annex—Exhibit.dwg 11/26/2024 12:52:59 PM I DAHO Exhibit Drawing for Jo 2 82 SURVEY o. 9939W EMER4LDST AnnexationAnneXatIO BOISE,IDAHO 83704 (208)846-8570 299 S. Black Cat Rd. sne i Na. GROUP, LLC A Portion of the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 16, Dwg. Date T.M., RAW., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 11/26/2024 s89°17'00"e 85.9 n77,28 pp e 4A9 92 3 v o M �O O N O O Uf CD V m °O M O C 494.31 n89°23'18"w City of Meridian Annexatoin Description 11/26/2024 Scale: 1 inch= 65 feet File: Tract 1:5.0009 Acres(217839 Sq.Feet),Closure:n00.0000e 0.00 ft. (1/565399), Perimeter=1864 ft. 01 n89.2318w 494.31 02 n00.4000e 384.5 03 n77.2800e 419.92 04 s89.1700e 85.9 05 s00.4300w 479.84 EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAWC�WEI�ty A ND DECISION &ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to change the future land use designation on 5.0 acres of land from the Low-Density Employment to Mixed Employment and the Annexation of 5.0 acres of land from RUT in Ada County to the Light Industrial zoning district, by K2 Construction. Case No(s). H-2024-0066 For the City Council Hearing Date of: May 6",2025 (Findings on May 13",2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6", 2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 61, 2025,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6', 2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 13', 2025,incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 61, 2025, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted,it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and a comprehensive plan map amendement is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6t'', 2025, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement.Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter.When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may, within twenty-eight (28) days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6`h, 2025. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 13 day of May 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) ADU Mayor Robert E.Simi on 5-13-2025 Attest: p R117IAN4�- � SF,AL Chris John n 5-13-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: / a� '! _ Dated: 5-13-2025 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT {L%WE IDIAN DEPARTMENT REPORT IDAH HEARING 5/6/2025 Legend ®®� 1 0 DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council Area of Impact ®' OAnalysis °� � FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner 6 ' 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Becky Moose SUBJECT: H-2024-0066 Core and Main LOCATION: Located at 299 S. Black Cat Road in the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 16, Township 3N,Range 1 W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to change the future land use designation on 5.0 acres of land from the Low-Density Employment to Mixed Employment and the Annexation of 5.0 acres of land from RUT in Ada County to the Light Industrial zoning district. B. Issues/Waivers Mixed Employment(M-E)and Low-Density Employment(LDE)designations are limited along the Black Cat and Franklin corridors. Currently,I-L zoning comprises 40.01% (38.1 acres of 95.1 acres)of the LDE FLUM designation and 55.24% (83.7 acres of 151.5 acres)of the M-E FLUM designation.These designations are intended to support a mix of employment uses and services,providing a transition between the residential east of Black Cat and industrial areas further west. The continued expansion of I-L zoning within these FLUM designations may reduce employment diversity,create additional truck traffic,and disrupt the intended transition. Staff acknowledges that this project extends the approval of Black Cat Industrial to the south;however,unlike that project,this one did not necessitate a traffic impact study. Moreover,improvements tied to Black Cat Road won't be required until Black Cat Industrial reaches 960,000 square feet of occupied buildings(it's currently at approximately 560,000 square feet).Although this 5-acre proposal may have a limited effect,any additional I-L zoning expansion in these areas should be carefully evaluated by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) C. Recommendation Staff: Approval with a development agreement. Commission: Approval with no changes to the staff report. D. Decision Council: Approved with no changes to the staff report. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial - Existing Zoning RUT in Ada County VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning Light Industrial Adopted FLUM Designation Low Density Employment Proposed FLUM Designation Mixed Employment Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 11/5/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 11/13/2024 Site posting date 4/25/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.D • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action No - Required • Access Via a new collector on the north portion of the site - from Black Cat Road. • Traffic Level of Service Black Cat: Better than"E" - Meridian Public Works IV.B Wastewater • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns See Comments in Section IV. Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Water available at site • Impacts or Concerns See Comments in Section IV. Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions for comments received or see public record. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S1216110054 Date Retrieved:2025/1/13 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 313 1,335 Surrounding Area 63% Nor city 46 0 ® City Limits 1,211 788.3 ■ Not City Household Change Household& Population Growth 6 , Households 02020 Population Change:50.3% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 59% 58% 2% Multi-family 43 40 ® Commercial Notes: See Error! Reference source not found..Error! Reference source not found.. Figure 2: ACHD Summary Metrics 0 Black Cat Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes Existing Level of Service Notable ACHD Comments a (Primary roadway impact) Programmed IFYP Programmed CIP Notes: See Error! Reference source not found..Error! Reference source not found.. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) Figure 3: Service Impact Summary Ready � O O 40- Marginal Caution 5 O°tea °°\ 0 hr j Q Notes: See Error!Reference source not found..Error!Reference source not found.. III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject property falls within the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan(TMISAP). The adopted Comprehensive Plan designates 299 S. Black Cat Road as Low-Density Employment. The Low Density Employment designation is defined by the TMISAP as low-rise office and specialized employment areas.LDE areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for professional offices and similar businesses.Low Density Employment areas should be designed with elements of Traditional Neighborhood Design.Design and development standards such as landscaping,pedestrian circulation and connection to open spaces, are recommended to help make developments more attractive, engaging and accessible places.Appropriate land uses include corporate and business offices as well as research facilities and laboratories. The Mixed-Employment designation is described by the TMISAP as an area to encourage a diversity of compatible land uses that may include a mixture of office,research and specialized employment areas,light industrial including manufacturing and assembly, and other miscellaneous uses.Mixed Employment areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small, local or start-up businesses, as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises.Mixed density employment will accommodate a wide variety of employers and serve as a primary gateway to Meridian and Meridian's prosperity. The applicant requests an amendment to the comprehensive plan to redesignate the subject property as Mixed Employment(M-E) and annex it with Light Industrial(I-L) zoning. According to the applicant's narrative,this change aligns with the TMISAP, as light industrial is an allowed use within the M-E designation,though mixed employment is the preferred zone, I-L is allowed. The applicant also notes that this request would serve as a continuation of the previously approved Black Cat Business Center(H-2021-0064) to the south.Under the Unified Development Code,the proposed use is defined as a contractor's yard. The concept plan proposes a single 19,000-square-foot building, with 14,492 square feet designated as warehouse space and 4,508 square feet as office space. The remaining site would be used for a contractor's yard and outdoor storage. In addition,the applicant has indicated that the number of employees at this site is approximately eighteen(18), with ten(10)trucks entering the site on a given day. This would be Core and Mains' second location in Meridian as their business continues to grow. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) However,staff notes that Mixed Employment(M-E)and Low-Density Employment(LDE) designations are limited along the Black Cat and Franklin corridors. Currently,I-L zoning comprises 40.01% (38.1 acres of 95.1 acres)of the LDE FLUM designation and 55.24% (83.7 acres of 151.5 acres)of the M-E FLUM designation.These designations are intended to support a mix of employment uses and services,providing a transition between the residential east of Black Cat and industrial areas further west. Staff is concerned that continued expansion of I-L zoning within these FLUM designations may reduce employment diversity,create additional truck traffic,and disrupt the intended transition.While this specific 5-acre request may have a minimal impact,further expansion of I-L zoning in these areas should be carefully evaluated by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Comprehensive Plan Policies Envisioned in this Area: • Focus on developing industries that exceed the living wage, such as technology,healthcare and other similar industries. (2.06.01E) While this use does not provide a significant amount of employment, the applicant will be providing additional jobs that will provide opportunities that will pay a living wage for residents. • Evaluate development proposals based on consistency with the vision as well as physical, social, economic, environmental, and aesthetic criteria. (3.01.01D) The proposed development does not meet all of the intended goals of the TMISAP, however, the applicant has worked with staff to substantially change their design to better integrate with the plan's intentions. • Slow the outward progression of the City's limits by discouraging fringe area development; encourage development of vacant or underutilized parcels currently within City limits. (4.05.03B) The subject property is eligible for annexation and has city limits on two (2) of its four sides. Currently, this property is vacant and by redeveloping it will provide opportunities for properties to the north and west to develop. • Ensure that regulations and plans support and encourage desired development and land use patterns within the Area of City Impact. (3.01.01C)Based on feedback from stakeholders, the desired land use for this area is primarily industrial as Meridian has very little vacancy and is a desirable location for industrial users. Table 4: Project Overview Description Details History N/A Physical Features Rosenlof Drain on the Southern Boundary Acreage 5.0 acres Percentage of I-L zoning in Low 40.01% Density Employment FLUM Percentage of I-L zoning in 55.24% Mixed Employment FLUM B. History Although this property has no prior development history,the adjacent properties to the south provide relevant context for its redevelopment. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) In 2021,the City approved the annexation of approximately 129.21 acres under the Black Cat Industrial project,designating the area as Mixed Employment(M-E) and Low-Density Employment(LDE) within the Future Land Use Map(FLUM) and zoning it as Light Industrial (I-L). The City Council determined that the industrial center aligned with the goals of the TMISAP. However,that approval covered a significantly larger area compared to this 5-acre request. Extending I-L zoning onto this parcel may further erode the planned low-density employment transition between the residential areas east of Black Cat Road and the General Industrial FLUM designation located approximately a half a mile west along Franklin Road. This shift may impact the balance of employment uses envisioned in the comprehensive plan and TMISAP. C. Site Development and Use Analysis The Applicant proposes an amendment to the FLUM to change the existing low-density employment designation to mixed employment. The Mixed Employment areas encourage a diversity of compatible land uses that may include a mixture of office,research, and specialized employment areas, light industrial including manufacturing and assembly, and other miscellaneous uses. These areas generally do not include retail and consumer service uses serving the wider community. While the I-L zone is not the preferred zone in the Mixed Employment designation,it can be an appropriate zone if the applicant can demonstrate the use of the property minimizes the impacts to surrounding properties and meets the intent of the TMISAP. In conversations,between staff and the applicant,it was determined this use would be relatively low impact and additional design changes were incorporated into the concept plan to ensure the site meets the intent of the M-E designation. 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): If annexed,the two existing residential structures will be removed, and the well and septic system abandoned in accord with the UDC. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant is requesting a modification to the Comprehensive Plan FLUM designation from Low-Density Employment to Mixed Employment and seeks annexation with Light Industrial(I-L) zoning.According to the applicant's narrative,the property would be developed as a new facility for Core and Main,including office and warehousing with an outdoor contractor's yard. The proposed hours of operation are Monday through Friday, from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM, with approximately 18 employees on-site. Currently,the Low-Density Employment designation does not permit Light Industrial uses such as those proposed. However,a change to the Mixed Employment designation would allow development under the I-L zone.While the preferred zoning in the Mixed Employment FLUM designation is the M-E zoning district, alternative zones may be considered when they align with the plan's vision and integrate with surrounding properties.The applicant asserts that the I-L zone is compatible with adjacent properties to the south. Staff concurs, noting that the proposed use aligns with prior approvals in the area and would contribute to the expansion of Light Industrial space along the Black Cat corridor.Additionally, while the proposed use does not provide a large amount of employment,it is providing employment and a relatively low impact use in the area. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The I-L zoning district requires a 35' street setback, 20' landscape buffer along collector streets,25' wide buffer along arterial streets, and allows height up to 50'. The concept plan FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) and elevations submitted appear to meet these requirements. The updated plans with the submittal of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review shall be in compliance with UDC 11-2C-3. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): UDC 11-4-3-8: Contractors Yard A. All structures or outdoor storage areas shall be located a minimum of one hundred(100) feet from any residential district. The proposed contractor's yard is located further than 100 feet from any residential district. B. Outdoor storage areas shall comply with Section 11-3A-14, "outdoor storage as an accessory use", of this title. The applicant is proposing the outdoor storage to be screened from the public right of way and will have a designated area on the site for it. The applicant has proposed an eight(8)foot fence to enclose the entire contractor's yard with additional landscaping to help screen the yard. The applicant has worked with staff to enhance the fence material and will provide finer landscaping details with the certificate of zoning compliance submittal. C. The site shall not be used as a junkyard or vehicle wrecking yard as herein defined. The applicant understands and will comply with this standard. Design Standards Analysis 5. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): UDC 11-3A-19 and Comprehensive Plan Goal 5.01.02D emphasize the significance of building frontages along public streets and/or public spaces. The applicant proposes to comply with the requirement by providing a minimum of 30%building frontage along Black Cat Road.Additionally,by having the building frontage along Black Cat Road,the applicant has helped screen the contractor's yard and outdoor storage from view along the arterial street. The applicant complies with these standards. 6. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 20-foot wide landscape buffer is required adjacent to the future collector on the northern portion of the site, and a 25-foot wide buffer is required adjacent to arterial streets (S. Black Cat Rd.).The proposed landscaping along the future collector does not appear to meet the requirements for a 20-foot buffer as the fence should be stepped back to allow for adequate pathway landscaping(see analysis in subsection v).Additionally, staff is recommending additional trees in the southern portion of the buffer along Black Cat Road to provide additional screening. These buffers shall be landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C.Additionally,the drainage ditch along Black Cat Road shall be piped in compliance with UDC 11-3B-6.Landscaping requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. ii. Parking lot landscaping Landscaping is required to be provided along all parking areas per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8. The requirements include 5 ft.perimeter adjacent to streets and islands of at least 50 sq.ft.per every 12 parking spaces. These requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. iii. Tree preservation FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-313-10C.5. iv. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape buffers along S. Black Cat Road. v. Pathway landscaping The proposed pathways along S. Black Cat Road appear to include five(5) feet of landscaping on both sides,meeting UDC requirements. However,the south side of the ten(10) foot multi-use pathway along the northern collector does not appear to have the required five(5) feet of landscaping. To comply with the TMISAP's street section requirements,ten(10) feet of landscaping is required south of the pathway. Given that the TMISAP includes on-street bike lanes, which is not the standard when ten(10) foot multi-use pathways are present, staff has determined that if trees are placed within the eight(8) foot parkway,the applicant may reduce the landscaping on the south side of the multi-use pathway to five(5) feet. However,if trees are not provided in the parkway,the full ten(10)feet of landscaping must be included, as specified in the TMISAP(page 3-20, street section Q. These requirements will be reviewed during the Certificate of Zoning Compliance process and must comply with UDC 11-313-12. 7. Parking(UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis In Industrial districts,the requirement shall be one(1) space for every 2,000 square feet of gross floor area.With the proposed I-L zone and building square footage of 19,000 square feet,ten(10)parking stalls are required. The applicant is providing 24 spaces which exceeds the UDC requirements. The applicant has indicated that no more than 18 employees will be present at any one time, which will leave roughly six(6)parking stalls for customers. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G; bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. 8. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Comprehensive Plan Goals 5.01.02C and 2.09.03A prioritize area beautification and community identity by promoting enhanced design standards that result in distinct and engaging developments. The Architectural Standards Manual(ASM) and TMISAP require surface plane modulation at intervals of no more than 50 feet,the inclusion of at least two pedestrian-scale architectural features,and a combination of at least two primary field materials and one accent material. The applicant proposes a large, one-story industrial building designed with higher ceilings and upper windows to create the appearance of a two-story structure. The exterior materials include Granitstone, Optimo metal panels, and stone veneer, with moderate to large setbacks from the street.While the primary entrances are oriented inward toward the collector street to FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) the north,the proposed frontages do not meet the ASM's 30% fenestration requirement along public streets. The applicant has been highly receptive to staff feedback and has worked collaboratively to refine the building elevations to better align with architectural standards. In response,the applicant has adjusted the building's orientation and incorporated additional materials, fenestration,and modulation. Staff is also exploring fenestration alternatives with the applicant that may be addressed through a design standard exception during the design review application.Final elevations will be evaluated during the design review process to ensure compliance with industrial design standards. 9. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): Outdoor storage and contractor's yards require closed vision fencing when visible from public right of way.With the extension of the collector along the north boundary and the Rosenlof canal on the south boundary,the entirety of the yard will be visible and will require an 8-foot closed vision fence around the entirety of the outdoor storage. D. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-311-4): Goal 6.01.02B of the Comprehensive Plan prioritizes reducing access points on arterial streets through strategies such as cross-access agreements, access management, and the development of frontage and backage roads.Additionally,it emphasizes improved connectivity between local and collector streets. Access to the site is proposed from a future collector street along the northern portion of the property.The applicant is responsible for extending this collector road as outlined in ACHD's Master Street Map.AC14D found that the proposed development meets all of ACHD's policies. Table: Road Infrastructure and Developments Along the Black Cat/Franklin Corridor Category Details Existing and Planned Road Infrastructure W.Franklin Road Existing: 2 lanes, no curb, gutter, or sidewalk. Planned: Widen to 5 lanes between W. McDermott Rd and S. Black Cat Rd after 2028. S. Black Cat Road Existing: 2 lanes, no curb, gutter, or sidewalk. Planned: Widen to 5 lanes between W. Overland Rd and W.Franklin Rd, 2036- 2040. Franklin&McDermott Intersection Planned: Multi-lane roundabout, construction scheduled after 2027. W.Franklin Road Connection Planned: Future connection to SH-16 via a signalized intersection. Planned &Approved Developments Full Impacts of these projects are yet to be Impacting the Corridor realized. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) Black Cat Industrial(H-2021-0064) 2.2 million sq ft of industrial space to the south. Farmstone(H-2023-0045) 378,360 sq ft of commercial and industrial uses across Black Cat Road. Avani Subdivision(H-2023-0049) 256 residential lots to the northeast. Vanguard Village 552 dwelling units. Braya Subdivision 330 single-family lots and 240 apartment units. District at Ten Mile Large mixed-use development(commercial, industrial,residential)impacting area roadways. Development Conditions Some projects are restricted from further buildout until key road improvements are completed. Traffic Impact/Construction of Collector from Proposed Use: The applicant anticipates approximately 18 employees on-site daily,with around 10 semi- trucks entering and exiting the property each day.To align with UDC 11-3A-3, which seeks to limit access points to collector and arterial roadways, staff recommends restricting the western access off the future collector street to truck traffic only.Additionally, a traffic impact study was not required as the size of the development is relatively small and is not anticipated to account for significant traffic counts. Additionally,the applicant is required to construct the future collector road along the northern portion of the site in accordance with the TMISAP Street Section C exhibit.If trees are planted within the eight(8)foot parkway,the applicant may reduce the landscaping on the south side of the ten(10)foot multi-use pathway to five(5) feet. However,if trees are not placed in the parkway,the full ten(10) feet of landscaping must be provided, as outlined in TMISAP(page 3-20, Street Section Q. 2. Pathways and Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-5, UDC 11-3A-17): The applicant is proposing to construct a 10-foot multi-use pathway along the south side of the future collector and along S. Black Cat Road. This is consistent with the UDC standards and the city's pathway master plan for this area. However,the applicant shall also construct the portion of the 10-foot multi-use pathway on the north side of the future collector that falls on their property (near the collector and Black Cat intersection). This shall be shown on the certificate of zoning compliance submittal. E. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): The Rosenlof Drain runs along the southern boundary of the site. The applicant is proposing to leave the drain open as they will not be impeding access to the irrigation canal. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-I5): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 3.03.03F. Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 15 days prior-to the eity eouneil meeting,provide a revised eoneept plan with the following re�isietZs: Depiet the portion of the 10 foot multi use pathway on the north side of the Mture eolleetor-that falls on the property (near the eolleetor-and Blaek Cat inter-seetion). if trees are provided inside the eight(8) foot par-lkway along the nor-ther-ft eolleetor-, appheant may r-eduee the landseaping on the south side of the ten(40)ffitilti pathway to five (5) feet.However,if the trees are not provided in the eight(8) foot Provide a feneing detail of the proposed eight(8) foot fenee. Provide trees that totiek matur-ity along the Blaelk Cat landseape buffer-south of the building to aid in ser-eening the eontr-aetor-'s yar-d. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,the DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) c. The western entrance off of the future collector roadway shall be signed and used for truck traffic only. d. All existing structures shall be removed from the property within 90 days of the annexation approval. e. Comply with the architectural standards manual and TMISAP. f. Construct the collector roadway on the north boundary in accordance with the street section exhibit C as listed in the TMISAP page 3-10 or to ACHD's standards prior to certificate of occupancy for the building.A cross-street exhibit shall be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) B. Meridian Public Works Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Available at Site services • Sower Shed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRI Declining Balance • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/facility Plan • Impacts/concerm See Public Works Site Specific Conditions water • Distance to Water Water Available at Site Services • Pressure Zone • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan • impacts/Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions NON-PLAT CONDITIONS Puet.tc WoKtcs Da•%K i H►.i Site Specific Conditions of Approval I. If a W ell is loew d on the site it must be abandoned per regulatory requirements and proof of abandonment must be provided to the City. 2. %ewer acccsc to the west is not mquiral.If there arc no future expansion plans in that direction,the end-of-lint sewer must be installed at a 0.6(r/o slope. 3. The water main along the north boundary needs to be twelve-inch. 4. Water maim must have a casing when crossing irrigation areas with seasonal attars r¢stnctions.Vither provide a casing or demonstrate that the City will have year-round acaxss. 5. Fire hydrants and water services outside of the ROW or the public utility casement along the mad require a 20'casement up to and 5'beyond the hydrant/mctcr. 6. If hydrants or water services arc inside the ROW or public utility casement,ensure no trots or permanent structures arc within 5'of fire hydrants/merer. 7. Ensure no permanent structures(trots,bushes,buildings,carports,trash rcccptacic walls,fences, infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)arc built within the utility casement Applicant still responsible to meet all landscaping requirement and should eoordinatc with their planner. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) G eral Conditions of Approval I. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department. 2. Pcr Meridian City Code(MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC R-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide cascment(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). Scwcrlwater casement varies depending on sewer depth.Sewer 0-20 ft deep require a 30 ft casement,20-25 ft a 40 ft casement,and 25-30 ft a 45 ft casement. Ensure no permanent structures(trots,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls,fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,ctc.)arc built within the utility casement. Submit an executed casement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Lind Surveyor,which must include the area of the casement (marked EXHIBIT A)and an HI/2-x I I"map with hearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review.Both exhibits must be scaled,signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor.DO NOT RECORD. 4. The City of Meridian rcquires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(I1I)C 1 1-3B-6).The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a singlc-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required.If a singlc-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 5. Any structures that arc allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of stroct addressing to he in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crootsing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per IIDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Rmurccs. The M-%-cloper's Engirmccr shall provide a statement addressing whether there arc any existing wells in the development,and ifso,how they will continue to be used,or provide record ofthcir abandonment. R. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordiaaooc Section 9-1 4 and 9 4 R. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures atsd inspoctiom(208)375-5211. 9. All improvcmcnts related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works dcvrlopmcnt plan review,and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. [I. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 401 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engincetod backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) 15. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations arc sct a minimum of 3-feet above the hig)tcst cstablished peak groundwater cicvation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall he responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD.The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans.This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall he responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. Thcsc record drawings must he received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project 19. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans.Street light plan roquiremcnts arc listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting.A copy of the standards can he found at http://www.meridiancity.org/public works.aspx?id 272. 19. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signawc.This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City.The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department wcbsite. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-221 1. 20.The City of Meridian requires that the owner". to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20'/.of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years.This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City-The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can he found on the Community Development Department wcbsitc. Please contact land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) C. Nampa &Meridian Irrigation District �a �r 'fl VU-4.'au 7augc1,rC" z%4&ea 15-3 ttAyt 51vul w.ti MAMA VAtrU K.W1 405 FAX*Z8 4630ov7 rvW,orp OPKE tttsnpo M94"?"I t fto► ttv,po a.asaua Ftt�Fwry:!.:o., City(krk't Ohike City of Aleridian ))P..hFttadwiq Avcm,c. Mendaan,IP A16t..;b 10 RF.: 11.2624-0(IW 2"S Black Cat Rd:Core&Main To RhYn It%U%Concern \snips&Meridian ItnralK,n DISVict I VMID)rcquirn a rtkd Iand t w.•l'Aanxi;Applwstwa to review poor to final plating. All pntatc Werah and yam vAla MMILbc prtigmtcd the Di4mt.Rmiralof Drain cotww i through the wash pwpert)line of sit ptogMty. 7U D,Aricta cawment(oF the kotcnlol Dram at tht,k%an.o tf a minimum of w%voty fW(V)total. thirt) fm()Ql n&V avid fcm (cvt(40') kh. kxtking b,wn,trcam to the%cct Ibis cafcment must he protected. Any rafrtwhnaeal wlthwt a ugacd Uccare Alrcrmrst snd ■ppno ctl plan lr ran conftruction if anocceptshif. All m rtwipul wfaue drainage mtut be FEVned tm aAr. If an)atunkq%d,-.il—d•, ,nvr Ica,c,the arb.N%tll)must review dramape plans.D c%tlopa ni"oorapl)with Idafx,c ttic'4 1.11 W PICAW Ice fne to corttW me for further mfonnalkm. 5trwcrcl), Stew Pardcw D6%ckVm,cwt Cttnitntlor damps A Meridian Irr4ltitat DiMict 1P itxrl Cc: l)fftnd lik D.Dhnall A.%Ak Applicant - 1. AMWOwAAM aacArl AM mtrrtownvtrc )).cnD low P1101(a ecoft ADM FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) D. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) "W ar-e.UK o.«tewr ACHD �:ciwo ADatr7aa Nax•nr\Civrmmrbn•r Date February 21',202S To Becky Moose Staff Contact Matt Pak Planner Project Description Core&Main Trip Generation This development is estimated to generate 74 vehICle trips per day, 9vehicle tripper hour-n the PM peak hour,based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual,11"edition ACHD Policies 11111111111V!ffZT71 ACHD Planned •. ACHUS LOS is Transit Available'? Comments •The tables above list the existing condnpons of the surrounding roadways without the proposed development as this applicatwn is for annexation and rezone only.With a future development application,this summary will be updated to reflect the development and its impact. connecting you to more Ma Cdnry Hgr ay DmKr.TM Manic Stta•t-Ca"@n Gry.ID-a3'7n4-DN 2W 307-6W-GX$4&76W•wowaarOwMm q V. FINDINGS A. Annexation(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Based on previous approvals, the Commission finds the proposed development is consistent with the TMISAP designation of Mixed Employment and the proposed development will be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) consistent with the previous approval of the Black Cat Industrial Business Complex on the property to the south. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Council finds that while the proposed map amendment to I-L zoning is not the preferred zoning in the Mixed-Employment area, it aligns with the existing zoning to the south and the intended use of the site supports the purpose statement of the I-L zone. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; This application proposes to annex 5.0 acres of property with the I-L zoning district to allow for a small employment and low impact user to expand its operation in the city. The Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Council finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Council finds the proposed annexation and zone of I-L to be in the best interest of the city due to previous approvals for the property to the south and providing employment through a low impact user. B. Comprehensive Plan(UDC 11-5B-7D) Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a amendment to the Comprehensive Plan,the Council shall make the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. The Council finds the proposed amendment to M-E is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the proposed development will provide employment and help with a transition from light industrial to residential as this use is relatively low impact on the overall area. 2. The proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and development of the city. The Council finds that the proposal to change the FLUM designation from Low Density Employment to Mixed Employment will allow for an extension of the approval on the development to south of this property and provide a low impact employment use. 3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan as noted in Section III. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with this Unified Development Code. The Council finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Unified Development Code. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) 5. The amendment will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. The Council finds the proposed amendment will be compatible with existing industrial to the south and due to the low volume of truck traffic will provide an adequate transition to the residential across S. Black Cat Road. 6. The proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. The Council finds that the proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities in this portion of the city. Sewer and water services are currently available to this site.ACHD has determined the traffic along S. Black Cat Road and W. Franklin Road will have sufficient capacity to allow for the addition of this use in the area. 7. The proposed map amendment(as applicable)provides a logical juxtaposition of uses that allows sufficient area to mitigate any anticipated impact associated with the development of the area. The Council finds the proposed map amendment provides a logical juxtaposition of uses and sufficient area to mitigate any development impacts to adjacent properties 8. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. For the reasons stated in Section III and the subject findings above, The Council finds that the proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map and Annexation per the provisions in Section IV in accord with the Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 20', 2025.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Annexation requests. I. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Becky Moose, Glenn Walker,Dave Heupel,Melanie Anderson b. In opposition: Cheryl Whiting-Storrs, Greg Storrs, Keith Whiting, Colton Storrs. C. Commenting Becky Moose, Glenn Walker,Dave Heupel,Melanie Anderson, Chem Whiting-Storrs, Greg Storrs, Keith Whiting, Colton Storrs. d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: Kurt Starman 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony A. Cheryl,Greg, Keith, and Colton all had concerns with the proximity of this industrial use next to the existing residential to the north in Ada County and with the new residential subdivisions being built on the east side of Black Cat Road. In addition,they have concerns that allowing this change from Low-Density Employment to Mixed Employment will erode the planned transition envisioned with the TMISAP and Comprehensive Plan. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. The Commission discussed the planned transition from residential to industrial users and deemed that Core and Mains recommendation for approval was consistent with the approval of the Black Cat Industrial Park to the south and that it is a relatively low- impact user. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) 4. Commission changes) to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. Determining if the change from Low-Density Employment to Mixed-Employment to allow for an Industrial user is appropriate considering the planned transition in this area. C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on May 6', 2025.At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject Annexation and Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing a. In favor: Becky Moose, Glenn Walker,Dave Heupel b. In opposition: None - Commenting: Becky Moose; Glenn Walker;Dave Hein d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2 Key_ issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3- Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a, The amount of industrial space in the city and whether it is adequate or not. The council all agreed that industrial space is something that the city does not have enough of. The council also asked about the sound study that was conducted and we satisfied with the standardized nature of it. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial AF11Fr Legend a as asa °�a Project Location eeeeatrge�1 ae aG��7 Area of Impact �•- O +Analysis LQ ".._. rai�4'e arm eases6s oa�e-ens._Sp'� r 7 9. T F }/ a FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) 2. Zoning Map [t � L- Legend �® � �; #�G Project Location R-2 R-;; Area of Impact ® Analysis RUT ®I R=8 CD RI ' TN-R WE R-15 I L C-N R-40 TN-C -L C-C- C-G M2 H-E R1� M-E RUT RR FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) 3. Existing/Proposed Future Land Use: 0 Dole: 1 T/Z025 u 500 �'� � Feet Adopted Future Land Uses fRANKIIN I Lpl>!nd a f. sc J I •e.• n� Not U y tvlure land Uses 'K%I.Yt X citywkir �- -�,-.{n� - e -low Density Resident" Medum Density Resdenhd -Med-Hds Density Resdenhp _Hgh Density Rrsi lenliol -Commercial -Office _fndvsfrO ONic Proposed Future land Uses -old Town —M«ed Use Neghtx h ccl _mmed Use Comf mity -Maed Use Repiond FRANKLIN — _Maed Use Non-Resdenhal Mxcd Use-hferchanpn Ton Mie Specific -low Density Employment -lifestyle Cenfef Q _Hgh Density Employment R)��,/�p(��,)��� Y �"=Maed Employment Q _ -Mms Use Rcsidmfial m -Maed Use C(xnnwcid FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) 4. Planned Development Map ry yam/ Legend Project Location 9 'P Area of Impact o T= City Limits Planned Parcels �E ®Analysis m o; o H t o ' 0 -------------------------- C— o FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) B. Subject Site Photos * 4�cl ' r Y < 4 - FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) C. Service Accessibility Report Overall Score: 11 2nd Percentile Criteria Description Location Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft. from parcel Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. Emergency Services Police Not enough data to report average response time Pathways Within 1/4 mile of future pathways YELLOW Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (# of lanes in master streets plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking School Drivability Not within 2 miles driving of existing or future school Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) D. Original and Revised Site Plans (date: 1/16/2025) 8 4 .awn ros 'n+S" _ I I I uoaaooalLm�urm 4 Z z "1111111111mlow Mai T �-. �4 I � � • w v+v�-n ��-� sass "• A I � II ! II II I --r 0 �PLAN j Y FM3 SCHEME M ®; PRELIMINARY C101 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) 1� ------------ I R TAU SGRT rRaat •nVY,4'1 I� *"my t1.VR R __..—.._..__.__.______ -� �. _I'T1 P.1a 11 I I 11RIUf IWIME1. •�••- � -•11 IIY.'o, AOAYA[fi 2211'." Intl I IJ 11 Ia\r Ol1TR00R rill 1 I Mt.(r 11 STILA4E Iru . I I '4E41Hi taco; O _ I H+r - I 1141 y - 1 MWPSTIR IMAM%- OZ..r.w%Rm j KItLVM I I Si1LA01'S/J I I nun fr-n I I1 T.UL S[M rlAal FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN-H-2024-0066) E. I2/21/2025) BIIIt) SCHEME K PRELIMINARY �III� -2 O O O O • • f, � e.... 0 � nsiuuuumuuwuuuwuuuuuuumuuumuuwuuuuu\.nuunnunmum:�uuunnumm�ununuu �Ri cr��������■�77f7fifl��s����sN�nJl�lf7����1 + 11111 �III� !most aw ■ • o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ___ __. i►�sss������sss►�ssss������sssssssss�� sss� 1::1:17f soi. AIMI lil FINDINGS OF • • OF • ORDER F. Annexation Legal Description&Exhibit Map W. Fronklin Rd. S.9 S.10 5.16 5.15 S8917'00'E "gg' 85.90' a N77'280= I - t I c al0i f 01 ;� 40 V"i; m 00 Annexation Area X/t g g o I 5.00 Auee o ED Of fn + N OW �I2 1 t I N1/16 N89'23'18'W 494.31' po'nt otf- Begnnip o, sd, Legend Found Wass Cop Monument e ' F OYnd AIJm nYm Cap UC—T«! \�Hkt t a 5. 6 5.15 ® Oananslon Poht �g0 vS�Nse 1SF G9L —--—--— Anne.ot on Bourdar y L.v U/z'; O Sectors Lhe d 82�5 R-ot-of-Way Lne �9 of NOV,�''f Pace Lane of RecarO .1C f ivF1 Sttyft. +'-t00' of D.bcoted R-ytt-of-ft, 0 75 SO 100 IOC :vr IDAHO ExhiOit Dtow-ng for T+No ��^.�, Annexation �"""'° "" 299 S. Black Cat Rd. Me SURVEY 1 GROUP. LLC A-o I,n e-tA.4LI/4 of 9-0 Kt/+N S«tm IA D.p Oct. T L..0Is 8M. A44 Cant 1". tI/N/2074 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) IDAHO 9939 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise,ID 83704 GROUP Phone:(2081 846 857C Fax: (2081 994 53" Ik.cnlxron for Annexation-('Ili of%terldfaa November 26,2024 The Oollowng Descnbes a Parcel of Land being a Portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Ncrtheas:IM of Section 16.Township 3 North.Range 1 Ydest,Boise Meridian,Ada County Idaho and more particularly described as follows COMMENCING a.the Northeast Comer of Section 16.Township 3 North Range 1 West Base Madan.From which.the Southeast Corner of the Northeast 114(East 114 Corner)of said Section 16 bears South 00'43'W'West 2 657 20 feet.Thence along the Easterly Ire of said Section 16,South 00'43'00'West 1328 55 feel to the North 1116 coma tre POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence le"ng said Easterly Ire and along the Saeheny I ne of sa 0 Northeast V4 of the Northeast 114.North 89 23'18"West 494 31 feet thence leavng said Southerly Ire.North 00*4d00"East 384 50 feet thence North 7 I'2800r East 419.92 feet. Thence South 89'1700'East 85 90 feet to the Eacterty line of said Secbon 16, Thence aorq said East"fine.South 00'43'00'West 479 64'eet to the POINT OF BEGINNING The above Described Parcel of Land contains 5.00 acres.more or less. `%t\*ijO 8251 Q •�Of 0 Pace I of I FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(CORE AND MAIN—H-2024-0066) E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (330 N. Linder Rd.) Between City of Meridian and Rinker Properties LLC for Property Located at 330 N. Linder Rd. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037885 Boise,Idaho Pgs=34 vbailey 06/18/2025 08:15:30 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Rinker Properties LLC, Owner/Developer 17th THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this day of June ,2025,by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and Rinker Properties LLC,whose address is 385 W. Creekview Drive,Meridian, ID, 83646, hereinafter called OWNEWDEVELOPER. 1. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-5B-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer has submitted an application for annexation and zoning of 1.00 acre of land with a request for the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district on the property as shown in Exhibit "A" under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested rezoning held before Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 4th day of February, 2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-330 N LINDER RD(H-2024-0048) PAGE I OF 7 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Rinker Properties LLC, whose address is 385 W. Creekview Drive, Meridian, ID, 83646, hereinafter called OWNER/DEVELOPER, the parry that owns and is developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-330 N LINDER RD(H-2024-0048) PAGE 2 of 7 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit`B" and the provisions contained herein. b. No more than five (5) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building. c. In accord with Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-3A-3,the Owner/Developer shall construct driveway stubs to the north in the area between the future maintenance shop and parking area and to the south in alignment with the existing driveway from the abutting property. Copies of the recorded cross-access/ingress- egress easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. d. The Owner/Developer shall install a 6-foot-tall privacy fence on the north property boundary to help buffer the neighboring residential. e. The existing structure is nonconforming with the 35-foot setback along N. Linder Road.Any future expansion will require compliance with the I-L zoning regulation per UDC 11-2C-3. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six (6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may, at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180)day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-330 N LINDER RD(H-2024-0048) PAGE 3 of 7 necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall,immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation,the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-330 N LINDER RD(H-2024-0048) PAGE 4 of 7 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed,completed,and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Rinker Properties LLC 385 W. Creekview Drive Meridian, ID, 83646 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term,condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-330 N LINDER RD(H-2024-0048) PAGE 5 of 7 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent, approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property ("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time, provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property, which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 21. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing rezoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; acknowledgements, signatures and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-330 N LINDER RD(H-2024-0048) PAGE 6 of 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Rinker Properties LLC By Vrint name): '6 Its (title): Vf\,-ivvkn%Iy� M State oft ) ss: County of On this da of ,2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public,in and for said State, personally appeared 1 9, known or identified to me to be the MXMIM RMOtKof Rinker Properties LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they exeWitedthe same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this ce e i t o e CHARLENE WAY COMM184M No. 67390 Notary Public �r�� n NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: '�� ego 0 STATE OF IDAHO CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-17-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-17-2025 State of Idaho ) ss County of Ada ) On this 17th day of Tune , 2025, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—330 N UNDER RD(H-2024-0048) PAGE 7 OF 7 EXHIBIT A ELS ENGEBRITS ON LA ND SURVEYS, PLLC. 2251 S. Sumac Street, Boise, Idaho 83706 Telephone (208) 859-6032 mike@elsurveys.com 17 October 2024 ELS Project No. 240506 Land Description EXHIBIT A Lot 3 of Heppers Acre Subdivision (a recorded plat on file in Book 20 of Plats at Page 1298, records of Ada County, Idaho) and a portion of the SE %of Section 12, T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: Commencing at a found brass cap monument marking the NW corner of said SW %of Section 12, thence southerly along the westerly line of said Section S 00°31'39" W a distance of 1483.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said line S 88°13'52" E a distance of 40.01 feet to a found steel pin monumenting the northwest corner of said Lot 3 on the easterly rights-of-way line of North Linder Road; Thence leaving said rights-of-way and continuing along the northerly line of said Lot 3 S 88'13'52" E a distance of 316.87 feet to a found steel pin monumenting the northeast corner of said Lot; Thence southerly along the east line of said Lot S 00°38'53" W a distance of 120.00 feet to a found steel pin monumenting the southeast corner of said Lot, Thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot N 88°13'52" W a distance of 316.62 feet to the southwest corner of said lot on the easterly rights-of-way line of said North Linder Road; Thence leaving said lines N 88'13752"W a distance of 40.01 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Section 12; Thence northerly along said westerly line of Section 12 N 00°31'39" E a distance of 120.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above-described tract of land contains 42,800 square feet more or less subject to all existing easements and rights-of- way. T 879 � F ZIP KAELS\Projects\2024\2405061\Adrnin\Legals\240506 Desc for annexation 090924.doc N. LINDER ROAD � ��- y BASIS OF BEARING _ N 00`31'39" E 2645.87' 2.75' N OD'31 39 E 21 0 00' t2'- r0 t* Con m rr, N 00 3139 E 120.00ir rw (Ar r r r r r O r r m y • �2 aI'SOD :1 jd9T�p tv W 00 `� (�,� 1 W m X Ho�.`� ti i O e N C Z u) �z z�c w�m �Nvto 226 coin o� �, ►�vi to O ;u roQ `OZ� ` w ;o o :yj r O r tv 00 r Cn r r � p m - - T- - S 00038'53- W 120.00' — L n EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation of 1.0 acres of land with an I-L(Light Industrial) zoning for the proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service.,by Nick Rinker. Case No(s). H-2024-0048 For the City Council Hearing Date of: January 21st,2025 (Findings on February 4t",2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 21 St,2025, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 21", 2025,incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 21 st, 2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of February 4',2025, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 21',2025,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 1 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of January 21',2025,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-652 1(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of January 21 st,2025. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -2- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 4th day of February 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. S iso 2-4-2025 Attest: SF,AL Chris Johnso 2_' f5 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. 1r,t� ,. 2-4-2025 By: ( (,(s Dated: City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -3- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r✓ Y 1- � 1�T��T"~-' DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/21/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location `, TO: Mayor& City Council Area of Impact }= City Limits t T FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org 4= APPLICANT: Nicholas Rinker _{ SUBJECT: H-2024-0048 --- a 330 Linder Road Annexation LOCATION: Located at 330 N. Linder Road in the SE ' --_ 1/4 of Section 12,T.3N.,R.l W. aY..._ - pi.- _ L I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L(Light Industrial)zoning for the proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service. B. Issues/Waivers The applicant has received a letter from the northern property owner to allow for a reduced landscape buffer to the residential property. This reduction will be from 25 feet to 5 feet. With this letter, staff finds the intent of the dimensional standards is being met. The applicant is seeking Council waiver to reduce this buffer as requested. The existing building is proposed to remain which will cause it to be non-conforming with the 35- foot street setback. C. Recommendation Staff Approval. Commission Recommendation: Approval. D. Decision Council: Approved FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -4- COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial/Car Dealership - 11. Existing/Proposed Zoning Rl in Ada County V.A.2 Future Land Use Designation General Industrial V.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 8/26/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/5/2024 Site posting date 11/23/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description Issue Reference Ada County Highway District II I.0 • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Shared access with the property to the south. - • Traffic Level of Service Better than E. - ITD Comments Received Yes Meridian Public Works Wastewater • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns Yes: See comments below. Meridian Public Works Water rs • Distance to Mainline Available at site - • Impacts or Concerns No Note: See section III. City/Agency Comments & Conditions for comments received or see public record https:llweblink.meridianci Ly.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=362253&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit Y. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -5- III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview This property is designated as General Industrial on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). The use of vehicle sales or rental and service is consistent with the comprehensive plan for the general industrial designation. The subject site is among several Industrial properties along Linder Road in the immediate area. The proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and services is a permitted use in the I-L zoning which is the zoning the applicant is requesting. In conjunction with the existing industrial users surrounding this property,the proposed use satisfies the general industrial designation on the comprehensive plan. Table 4: Project Overview Description Details History I N/A Acreage 1.0 acre B. History and Process The subject property is part of an enclave area surrounded by City annexed property. Annexation of this land will provide more efficient provision of City services. Industrial uses exist to the west across N. Linder Rd and to the south and east; single-family residences exist to the north and in Ada County. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The existing residence is proposed to remain as the main office for the vehicle sales business. The building shall abandon well and sceptic and connect to city services at the time of annexation in accord with UDC. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service is a permitted use in the I-L zoning district and aligns with the surrounding area. By adding additional industrial properties in the city,this project contributes to the community's employment and economic growth. Specifically, it adheres to Policy 3.07.01D,which encourages the preservation of industrial land use areas by discouraging non-industrial users. Additionally,the proposal is consistent with Policy 3.06.02D,which recommends locating industrial uses close to state highways and the rail corridor. The property's location adjacent to Linder Road enhances its accessibility to both the rail corridor and state highways. Staff finds the proposed use to be consistent with the UDC and Comprehensive Plan. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards of the I-L zoning district in UDC Table 11-3B-3. The applicant has received a letter from the northern property owner to allow for a reduced landscape buffer to the residential property. This reduction will be from 25 feet to 5 feet and requires City Council waiver to reduce the buffer as proposed. Staff is supportive of the reduction since the adjacent property will more than likely develop with an industrial use in the future. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -6- Additionally,the existing building will be non-conforming if annexed due to the 35-foot setback requirement off Linder Road. The building is roughly 37-feet off the curb line but is within the 35-feet when measured from the ultimate right of way. If approved,this would create a non-conforming building and any new construction will be required to comply with the I-L dimensional standards. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): Vehicle Sales or rental and service— UDC 11-4-3-38: A. Vehicle repair may be allowed as an accessory use,subject to the standards for vehicle repair,major,and minor,in the district where the use is located. The applicant is proposing a future maintenance shop for vehicle repair purposes. While this is not going to be a use established on the site with the initial development, the applicant will come through permitting for establishing this accessory use in the future. B. Inoperable or dismantled motor vehicles shall be stored behind a closed vision fence, wall,or screen or within an enclosed structure and shall not be visible from any street. The applicant is proposing a future maintenance shop that will house any inoperable vehicles. In the interim, there will be no inoperable or dismantled cars on the site. C. Automotive sales and rental areas shall be subject to the minimum perimeter landscape requirement of parking areas in chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title. The minimum perimeter landscape requirements are being met and a reduction of the northern 25 foot landscape buffer is requested through a council waiver. D. In addition to chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title, one(1) square foot of landscaping for every fifty(50) square feet of vehicle display area shall be provided. The site has 540 square feet of proposed vehicle display area which means 11 square feet of landscaping is required and the applicant exceeds this landscaping requirement. E. Vehicle display pads are prohibited in the required landscape buffers. The vehicle display is outside of the required 12.S foot with water conserving design landscape buffer along Linder Road fulfilling this requirement. However, the applicant shall only be allowed to have 3 vehicles displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. UDC 11-3A-19 discusses the importance of building frontage along public roads and requires a minimum of 30% of the fagade to occupy the frontage. By limiting the display vehicles to 3, staff finds the fagade will maintain is prominent form along the frontage. F. Vehicle display areas shall incorporate design features including,but not limited to, landscape islands, curbing,and pedestrian walkways,that define main drive aisles and internal circulation patterns. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -7- The concept plan shows curbing around the vehicle display with landscaping on both sides to meet this requirement. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets The applicant is proposing waterwise landscaping which allows for a 50%reduction in street landscape buffers. A 12.5-foot wide street buffer is required to be constructed along N. Linder Rd., an arterial street,measured from back of sidewalk, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Landscaping requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. ii. Parking lot landscaping Parking lot landscaping is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-8C. A minimum 5-foot wide buffer should be provided along the east property boundary unless the requirement is reduced or waived by the Director for truck maneuvering areas as set forth in UDC 11-3B-8C.1a. Staff recommends the applicant shift the planter islands to the eastern buffer where the easement begins to maximize the parking on site. Landscaping requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses A 25-foot wide buffer is required to the residential land use to the north as set forth in UDC Table 11-2C-3 and 11-4-3-34F, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The Applicant requests City Council approval of a reduced buffer width from 25-to 5-feet adjacent to the residential use to the north as allowed by UDC 11-313-9C.2 with notice to surrounding property owners.A reduction to the buffer width shall not affect building setbacks; all structures shall be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the I-L district(i.e.25-feet).A letter was submitted from the abutting property owner to the north, Christopher and Angela Olson,agreeing to the proposed reduced buffer.While the landscape buffer will be reduced,the building will still be 25 feet from the north property line. Additionally,the eastern landscape buffer shall be landscaped in accordance with the irrigation districts' allowances. iv. Tree preservation A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. v. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along N. Linder Road. 2. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6 requires one space for every two thousand(2,000) sq. ft. of gross floor area in industrial districts. The applicant has provided 27 parking spaces which exceeds the UDC requirement. However,the applicant shall provide details for where customers will park on the lot. This shall be separate from the vehicles for sale on the property. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -8- ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G; bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. Bicycle parking is not depicted in the plans and shall be included with the certificate of zoning compliance application. 3. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): The applicant is proposing to keep the existing residence and convert it into the main office. Since the building is proposed to remain, it is not subject to the architectural standards. However, a tenant improvement permit will be required from the Meridian Building Department to convert the residence into a commercial building.Additionally,the applicant is proposing a future maintenance building that will be required to comply with the architectural standards manual. 4. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): The applicant is not proposing fencing with this application. However, staff recommends a 6- foot tall privacy fence is installed and maintained on the north boundary to help buffer the neighboring residential. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): One(1)full driveway access exists to this site via Linder Rd.that is proposed to be eliminated,and the applicant will share access with the property to the south through a cross- access agreement. The intent of the UDC(11-3A-3) is to improve safety by combining and/or limiting access points to arterial streets to ensure motorists can safely enter all streets. Where local street access is not available,the property owner is required to grant cross-access/ingress-egress easements to adjoining non-residential properties. Although the use to the north is currently residential, it's anticipated to change to a non-residential use at some point in the future. The use to the south is commercial; as a provision of the development agreement, a cross- access/ingress-egress easement was required to be provided to the subject property at the time of future construction on the site and/or expansion of the existing parking lot,which has not occurred. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, Staff recommends as a provision of the development agreement, driveway stubs are constructed to the north and south property lines and a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granted to the properties to the north(Parcel #R3579000012) and south(Parcel#R3579000020)in an effort to combine and limit access points to the arterial street(i.e.Linder Rd.). Copies of the recorded easements should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. While a fire truck turnaround is provided on-site,the applicant shall widen the cross-access from the south to a 25-foot drive aisle. Additionally,the applicant shall work with our fire department to ensure the turning radius for the entrance is sufficient. This will be analyzed with the certificate of zoning compliance. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -9- 2. Sidewalk/Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): An attached 7-foot wide sidewalk was recently constructed along N. Linder Rd. along the frontage of this site. The Pathways Plan designates a 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway in this area. Because the sidewalk was recently constructed, the Park's Dept. does not recommend it's removed and a new pathway constructed in its place at this time. If a new pathway is constructed in the future,there should be adequate room within the existing right- of-way(11'+/-) for the pathway without dedication of a public use easement. F. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-I5): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. III. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat or certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: A. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. B. No more than five (53)cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building. C. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,the applicant shall construct driveway stubs to the north in the area between the future maintenance shop and narking area and to the south pr-epefty line in alignment with the existing driveway from the abutting roper ,-ad a-ad.. ----- ---ess/i gross egess ease ei4 gmn4ed to the pr-e,.eAies to the neftl, (Par-eel#R3 5 70/10001 2) and south(Par-eel#R3570111111020)i an e f f .w to FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 10- ri.bine.-ad lifnit, o peiftts t N Linder-Read. Copies of the recorded cross- access/ingress-egress easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. D. The applicant shall install a 6-foot-tall privacy fence on the north property boundary to help buffer the neighboring residential. E. The existing structure is nonconforming with the 35-foot setback along N. Linder Road. Any future expansion will require compliance with the I-L zoning regulation per UDC 11-2C-3. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 11 - B. Meridian Public Works Wastewater + Dlstance to Sewer Available at Site Services + Sewer Shed + EStirriatedProjed Seeappllcatlon Sewer ERU's + WERF Nelining flalarata3 + Projied Consister;t Yes with WW Master Plan/Fadli F Plan + Impactsftoncerns + See Publ le Works Slte S cific Condltions Water + DistancetoWamr Water Avall able atSite Services + PressureLwe EstimatedProjert Sae applleatlon Watef ERU's + Water Quality None + Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan ImpactVCDncems None-Ensure flo trees are located within 10'of the Water Mete NON-PLAT CONDITIONS Ptjwc-Woe Ks DrPA x-rm F.,%-r 5iie Specific Conditions of approval _ If a WO l is luC ttH on the Site it must h alrpndomCd Per rc,4ulawry requirements And prwf of abandonmcm rausl be pmvidcd to the City, 2, Ensure no sewer smices pass through infiltration Umbel, 3_ Provide H0'Easements For mains,hydrant laterals and waver services. E sernows shouild oxtond up to the and of mftiivhy�=nCwater meter and l0'beyrmd it. S_ No petmtanent s"eture5(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences, infiltration trenches,light pola3,ctc_)to bt:built within the utility c alst:mrntt. General Conditions Dt Approval I_ Applicant shall coordinate water and€.,wer main size and routing with the Public Works Depanntum. 2_ PeT MeridiLm City Code(MCC),the app]i rant$Mall lee respnmsiM w in"I Sewc r r5nd water mains to and through this dc;-clopn,cnt, Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infr,PSSrLEcwrc cnhaneenlcnt Per NfCC 9-fi-5, FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 12- 3_ The applicant shall provide ea3wmern(s)for a]I public water/sewer mains outside of public nghl of way.(include all water services and hydrants)_ Sewerfwater easement%laries depending on sower depth.$elver U-20 ft drrp require a 30 ft-rwmcnL,20-25 ft a 44 ft rkw nor,and 25-30 Ik a 45 ft casement. Ensure no pcTmmcrtt rATuctures(trees,Wsbcs,buildings,carports,trash macptncie walls,fences,infiltration wenches,light poles,etc.)are built within[he utility casement, submit an execrticd easement(on the form available front Public Works),a legal description pr4pa1vd by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land S urveyar,which must include the area of the easer tCttl (marked EXI:I l BIT A)and art 8112"x l 1"map wi Lh bunrings and distances(marked F%l'11 B IT 9) for mview.BgLh exhibits must be waled,signed and dated by a Professional Land Survuyor.DO NOT RECORD. 4_ The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year round source of water{UDC I I-3 B-G).The applicant should be required to use any existing surkee or well water for the primary source_ Ha surface or well source is trot available,a single-poieL connectirm La the culinary water system shall be-required.I f a single-point mn"re6c t is 111;l i zrdl' the developer mill be respoasiblc for the paymcnt ofasscsslnenis far the common areas prior to prior toTecciving&velopmcnt plan approval. 5_ Any structures that are al lowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignmcm of street addressing to be in eamphance w iih MCC- 6- Al l irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,inierseeting. Cr05SinS OF baying udiuCenl And umLiguow to thr area being suWi%�&d shall be addw-q.vYi per UDC I l-3A-i, In performing such work,the appl i cant shall corn plywith Idaho Codc42-1207 and any athGraMicab#c law i r wguiation, 7_ Any wells Thal will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Id;dto Wall Consirtwtion Standards Roles adminisiered by the Idaho Dopartmera of Water Resourory. 'N, Developer's Engineer shall provide a stawrnimL addmminil wheLhtK them are any existing walls iri Lhe develoPMOL,and if so,how they will continue Lo be used,cr pmNi4e record of their abandonment. $_ Any existing septic systetus within this project steal I be removed fronn service per City Oridinanoe Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8, Cxontact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and insNab ms(208)375-5211. 9. All improvements irlawd to pub]ir life,Safety and health shall be wmplmted prior to orrup4=y of the structums, to. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works developrn"I plan review,and construction inspection tees_as detenu fined duriug the plan Teview process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval ietter. 11_ It shalt be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all deNclopmenL fcatureS comply with the AmonCAns with Dissbilitics ACL And Ow Fair Housr ng Art. 12, Applicant shall k responsiblc for appl ication anti]complianrc wiib any Section 404 Pcrmiui ng that may be required by the Array Corps of Enginom. 13. Developer shall cooMinate tuailbox locations with the Meridian Pas[Ofiice_ 14_ Cord paction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building DeWrdent for all building pads receiving tnginecmd baxkfil I,where fonring would sit atop fill material_ l5_ The design engineer shall be required Lo certify that Lhe street centerline elevations we mat a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater cleva6on. This is to c um Mal the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes,is at least 1-foot above_ Its. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project thal do not fall under the jurisdiction ofan irrigation digtic qr AC'HD_The design ertgineershall pirn+ide eertificuliM that the facilities bavo been inslWled in accordance with the appmwd design plans.This certification will be required before a wrtifreair of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project, FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 13- 17_ At the earnplation of the project,the applicant;hall be risponsiblo to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and epprovod prior to the ismancc oFa cereification of nrr:uppnry for any stnutur-s within the prpj-ta 18. A street light plan will need w be included in the civil cons Ilion plans.Start light plan requirements are listed in section&5 of tht:improvement Standards for Street Lighting,A copy of the standards can be fotmd al hup:lJwwtw_ttteridi rnctt .oigrpublic_works.asp7' 19_ The City of Meridian roquires that the owner post to the City a perfonnance surety in t[W aMount of 1251Ya pf thr total mnstrurtion cost far all incomplete se-wor,wstor and reuse infhStructurc prior to final phu si�,natun.This surety will be verified by a line item t7xt estimate pMViJUd by the owner to the-City.The sttrcty can be posted in the faun of an i rrcvocabl a lcticr of cr%-di t,cash deposit or bond.AppliMat Must file au application for surety,which can be found on tUc Community Developuuem DNpanniem websitc. Plcasc contact Land Development Scr+'icc for mare itiformation at SR7-221 1. 20_ The City of Meridian requires that the owncK ptxst to the City a warranty surety in the w nun r of M of the total consttuciion cost for all completed scwcr,water and reuse infrastructure far duration oftwo years.This surety will be verifcd by a line item cost estimate provided by the oWaer to the City_The surety can be posted in the fomt of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or band.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found 6n the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for mim inkrmati0n at 887-221 1. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 14- C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) ACHD1— lqil Fiy,PfSi,dOf,1 MIA^ }GJ+G.VKS�fS'Ay[I[ ] N —r%,-aar5 Cow,m Yrom, kr,i[firtlir,a,pr,ia.nm�anr, Cavr F4KI,wy.Gu+nmko-u,iw Imo; Se;x.@ riber 27, 2 To: Nkh41d5 kin ker,vie Swna,l Staff Contact:Fraral-eigh Troyer,Planner PrbJOitt 113ttdriOtl6m Lihdar WPM Carr Pitotal d SaMS This ir,an anrwxatim and regorm application forlhe ideveloprrrerlt of a 1,194 square foot office space and 1,4n square foot automob4e mai ntenar ce strop on 0117-acres_ TpioGeneratewk TNS development is a Wnarted W rgenerale 24 veihICie tr4M per day. 3 vehi-elE trip W hour ir'I the PM In"k hour,baud oft 06 IrLuitutb of T�ar,tpo►t8t.or` Engineers Trip Generation Manual,Wh vdil wi- r_ Do area roadways nwet • ■ IS Transmit AvaiLable'? Comments The tables above list the emstlrlg condlttonsof the surrounding roa4�+aYs wi#t+au#the Q*¢G �eweloo++�e►r#as rl,is apWisa#�on i€for�n++exat�n and rezone only.with a hitur$developmenr.a pplrca,tomn.rhi5 summary wi II Ile updated to ro&Kt the Oevokpivien(and its Irnpx#, 1V. conrpeaingj o J to Il " A412C riryn,gr-ay rankT-TnEldArf%5crPm-Gv6x,Gq�f.lp-ErM-Pk,roR�lJhh.10-F}{3aFF'�553 sawk a[rd,tlro,sag FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road-H-2024-0048) - 15- 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant's proposal to annex 1.0-acre of land with I-L zoning for the development of a vehicle sales or rental service facility is consistent with the General Industrial FL UM designation for this property. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment to I-L and conceptual development plan generally complies with the purpose statement of the I-L district in that it will encourage industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are operated entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures and is accessible to an arterial street(i.e. Linder Rd.). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed industrial use should be conducted entirely within a structure. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. IV. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning &Zoning Commission heard this item on December 5th, 2024. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation request. I. Summary of Commission public hearing_: a. In favor: Nick Rinker and Matt Wilke b. In opposition: None c. Commenting None d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) of public testimon: a. None 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by Commission: a. Cross access to the property to the north. Creating a non-conforming structure with the approval of this application. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 16- The amount of vehicles being displayed along Linder Road. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. The number of vehicles being displayed along Linder Road and cross-access to the northern property. Staff has talked with the applicant and ITD about vehicle display areas as ITD requires 5 spaces. Staff is proposinga hange to this DA provision for your consideration. Additionally, the gpplicant would like to defer cross-access until his property is redeveloped into a use separate from a vehicle sales or rental and service center. Staff is proposing alternative language to allow for the cross-access to be deferred until redevelopment of the subject property. C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard this item on January 7th and 21', 2025. At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject annexation request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a_. In favor:Nick Rinker and Matt Wilke b. In opposition:None c_. Commenting:Nick Rinker and Matt Wilke d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application:Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony, a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Cross access to the property to the north. The council discussed the need for a stub rather than an easement and where the best location for the cross access. The council determined the best location for this would be at the rear of the property between the maintenance shop and parking. b. The council also briefly discusses the changes from 3 to 5 vehicle display areas. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. Council approved the change to provision B to change the amount of vehicles able to be displayed along Linder Road from 3 to 5. b• Additionally,_ Council approved a change to provision C requiring a stub street between the maintenance shop and rear parking to the property to the north. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 17- EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial V. Legend Project Location Area of Impact " " a OAnalysis "gyp r r r r it v ems. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) - 18- ` _ ■ ■il■■ r i■■Ir�■w a■ ■1 1� 1 � Z ■■■■■■.�■'I ■r ��runuu ■r ■■1■■■■■■ _ 1"'1 !l1I11111!■■! •1111� ��1llillll!!!.■ �r,� • r ■■ �■ li � ■'17 ■■illl■■r 'l■■ L"JrIJ I.sommili r1i1G � I TIN 1 r ♦ 1�1 1 r'�9rinn ♦ :=: 1 Nnn�►zi 1 11i11■111111►�Fi MEW FRANKLIN on �V � i■lM#f�� 1 �ff 1 I� l■�I �iI I ■ O �Rjl+ 1! ■.r■lllllfi II.. . 1 ■.!■■��. \l■■■■uii \■ ■■■1■■■■■ •. .. ■rlu1111!■■! •111! �■!■llllll!!! IN +■■11�ll��ra■ � - nmm�■7■`� 1 w i111l11■■111 ■11■�� r' 1 ■► In w !l ■ ■Il■ 11�1 R■■ »E �■111111 1111 ,. � ll� �■� 1 11.■fI�L' -10 Ir1■■■r■ � II■111■RI11►�� -- CBill F WAN K01N a won do ts 11-1 f�f �� 'III;IIIIIII'I - , ■ Q,, t i ��� i;� IIr11Iy r■i i s` ■■■ll!■lR � .II■■■■■■ •' 1 �. '�.. 1 11�' ' 4. Planned Development Map Legend LCLL7= Project Location , M Rpm 7T-r 0 Area of Impact T==' City Limits Planned Parcels Q Analysis Ek ___, , „ P �4�1-!����41-!�--_44LL�.•�YY LW_LLLI�� FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -20- B. Subject Site Photos r' T 4 y FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -21 - C. Service Accessibility Report Description Location Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Within 100 yrfloodplain & < z acres RED Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master street= GREEN plan) matches existing # of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a Schaal Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile drivin.-. GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park t%:pe RED FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -22- D. Site Plan (date: 11/4/2024) Et Lu Ro ui S kph rFE C wx •.ra,www�w, w.wue 6 Yb yµ � k a rr rY �•' 4 �" �;.'�� '' ' ''g ff a �x�x�.�^- F ¢ ; q +ad R o.r � S T RRCHWLCTURAL SITE PLAN ; r— AS1 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -23- E. Annexation Legal Description &Exhibit Map ELSE GE'ERIJ'S00IV LAND.SURVEYS,PLLC. 2251 Sumac Sfreet,Boise,Jdaho 83706 TpiWow(208)M6M ff&&@eo wys.mm t7{,1cta8er 2p24 ELS Protect No.24OM-' Lw+d Owraipuoa EMMIT A Lot 3 sf i1a"yf*r5 Acre Subdiv6w�vewidnd fat cr fi-e in Sc,1*20 of Plais aM Ptge 124 retard$OF Aaa County,Id®ho) end a pgtgpi of N SE!A of SKdo l'.2,T.3 N.,R.10. B-M,MoMi2n Ada Calnly,Idaho:descrftd as follows: :7 nmaraiN al a Jovid brass W rromwenl markrtd m 1W ammo of gala SW Y+of Section 12+mEncE 1n6Ulhert!ak rl9 fie weMra Ire 04 said Section S 04'"a1']' 'h'a dstance of i d 12 W..la fita PCAVT OF 9;GINNW1 Thanoa leavh9 Bald Hne 5 f39 ln2'E a distalm of 40.01 eet hs a found st@.ji omnwurneM4 the no ihrm 1 oorner of said Lul 2 an the Wg1?fh'r4g111s�Ina of Narlh air R0aa. Thmxie lwsvir4 said rights--kyay Wcxmtratinp niorg 7teeOrp Oyrinedsaid Lar3 SW135Z Ea cis ranceaf 316,f feet to afoundmeetpiumommemkgIflenprftWcamorod said La; Thanm southerly arwp pie e2d Iite of said La$W38'5Y W ad Uarre od 12O.W W k1 a fund deal On mmumenorg ire&Vtm asl ranter of gad LOI; T1VIIeE'W0nMF a1919 the?pUl}rgil!3rio of said Lot N W13'52.41'a dWanos of 316.62 feet ic-%o muf}trveat Corner of said kx an the ta6f*NMs-of-wary itxa of mA Noah Linder RDad; Thencereautitgsaid Itivts#a W13'6P"W a dWamdLOA7 feel to again^:�n II:e vraslady the ofSara ses'ibn 12: Thengenprlhody gang said mltedy Ilnoaf SKbDn 12 N 30'31'M'E at di,lWnca of 12{}MU W.lono Ptl —OF KKINING. The abovm-dee+Tibsd tract gf rwg comi-is 42.8W square fegl mate or leas siNEd m pil eklsli l�easurnBnts and Aghlmf. � e r 9 2 K�FI e3Un�66t.�mry,�a�2iC579:'exfn-mncx�.an{9[�2�.dcc FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -24- _ ov:3T'd9-s 45,87' 70#2,75' N 0'37;39" E '.-_.. Al XJI'39' E 2212.GQ' r I � sn i rn s �fA �� p Ni p I O W rn fi FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(330 N.Linder Road—H-2024-0048) -25- E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of$(11,600) to accept donation from Boise Area Pickleball Association (� E N MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Consent Agenda From: Mike Barton, Parks &Recreation Meeting Date: June 17, 2025 Presenter: Consent Agenda Estimated Time: Consent Agenda Topic: FY2025 Budget Amendment for BAPA Cash Donation to City Background: Over the years,we have worked closely with the Boise Area Pickleball Association (BAPA) to further the sport of pickleball in the Treasure Valley. Since BAPA was first formed, many courts have been added, including those in Meridian. There have been many increased opportunities to play pickleball and an increased awareness of the sport; Therefore, BAPA felt they had fulfilled their mission, and it was time to dissolve. Because of our close relationship with BAPA, they have donated their remaining funds of$17,500 to the City to purchase windscreens around the pickleball fences at Settlers Park($4,950), 4 portable nets to be used at Settlers Park($400), and 10 pickleball paddle holders at various sites ($550). The remaining funds ($11,600) will go directly into our Care Enough to Share program. This budget amendment will place the funds in a GL so we can purchase the items that were agreed upon. Council Action: Approve this budget amendment as presented. 6/4/2025 11:34AM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Personnel Costs Full Time Equivalent(FTE): Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total E IDI�A� �- 01 5210 41200 0 Wages 01 5210 41206 0 PT/Seasonal Wages I D 01 5210 41210 0 Overtime Please only complete the fields 01 5210 41304 0 Uniform Allowance highlighted in Orange. 01 5210 42021 0 FICA $ Amendment Details 01 5210 42022 0 PERSI $ Title: Boise Area Pickleball Association Donation 01 5210 42023 0 Worker's Comp $ - Department Name: Parks and Recreation 01 5210 1 42025 0 Employee Insurance $ - Presenting Department Name: Parks and Recreation Total Personnel Costs $ Department#: 5210 Operating Expenditures Primary Funding Source: 1 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description One-Time On-Going Total CIP#: 01 5210 54000 0 Equipment&Supplies(windscreens) $ 4,950 $ 4,950 Project#: 01 5210 54000 0 Equipment&Supplies(portable nets) $ 400 $ 400 01 5210 54000 0 Equpiment&Supplies(pickleball paddle holders) $ 550 $ 550 Is this for an Emergency? ❑Yes No 01 5210 0 $ - New Level of Service? ❑Yes No 01 5210 0 $ 01 5210 0 $ - Clerks Office Stamp 01 5210 0 $ 01 5210 1 0 $ 01 5210 0 $ 01 5210 0 $ 01 5210 0 $ 01 5210 0 $ 6-17-2025 Ol 5210 0 $ - Date of Council Approval Total Operating Expenditures $ 5,900 $ - $ 5,900 Capital Outlay Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Acknowledgement Date 01 5210 0 � �, ice 6/4/25 01 5210 0 01 5210 0 Depa ent Do- 01 5210 o APPROVED 01 5210 0 ay Jenny Fields at11:47am,Jun04,2025 in Todd's absent 01 5210 0 C ' f Financial Off' Total Capital Outlay $ - Revenue/Donations ki&__A4— Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total `Con ' iaison — 01 1 5200 1 34800 0 Cash Donation for Care Enough to Share $ 11,600 1. 6-5-25 01 5210 34745 0 Sports Revenue(to purchase equipment) $ 5,900 Ol Ol 5210 1 1 0 Mayor Total Revenue/Donations $ 17,500 Total Amendment Request $ (11,600) 6/4/2025 11:34AM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Total Amendment Cost-Lifetime Prior Year(s)Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Department Name: Parks and Recreation Funding 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Title: Boise Area Pickleball Association Donation Personnel $ r—strtn.rrotng Rodger A...endme.as: Operating $ 5,900 $ - $ $ $ - >Department will z,M Amendment Witi Directors signature to Finance(eudget Manager)for reNew Capital $ - >Finance-ll,nd Amend...enttecouncil uarson for:igna..re Total $ - $ 5,900 $ - $ - $ - $ - >cm,ncll Da6on wig send aignea Amendment m Maynr Total Estimated Project Cost: $ 5,900 >Mayor will send signed Amendment to Finance(Budget Manager) Please answer all Evaluation Questions using the financial data referenced above. >nnance(aadget Manage.)w ill s—cl,ppro,ed copy oramendcc—to department ➢Department will add copy of Amendment to C—it Agenda using Municode Agenda Manager 1. Describe what is being requested? Over the years,we have worked closely with the Boise Area Pickleball Association(BAPA)to further the sport of pickleball in the Treasure Valley.Since BAPA was first formed,many courts have been added,including those in Meridian.There have been many increased opportunities to play pickleball and an increased awareness of the sport;Therefore,BAPA felt they had fulfilled their mission,and it was time to dissolve.Because of our close relationship with BAPA,they have donated their remaining funds of$17,500 to the City to purchase windscreens around the pickleball fences at Settlers Park($4,950),4 portable nets to be used at Settlers Park($400),and 10 pickleball paddle holders($550)at various sites.The remaining funds($11,600)will go directly into our Care Enough to Share program. 2.Why was this budget request not submitted during the current fiscal year budget cycle? The donation did not come to us until March 2025.This budget amendment will place the funds in a GL so we can purchase the items that were agreed upon. 3. What is the explanation for not submitting this budget request during the next fiscal year budget cycle? We are expected to purchase these items ASAP. 4.Describe the proposed method of funding? If funding is split between Funds(i.e. General,Enterprise,Grant),please include the percentage split. List the amounts and sources of anticipated additional revenue that will result from approval of this request. General Funds 5.Does this request align with the Department/City's strategic plan? If not,please explain how this request was not included in the Department/City strategic plan? Yes. 6. Does this request require resources to be provided by other departments? If yes,please describe the necessary resources to be provided by other departments. N/A 7.Does this Amendment include any needed Equipment or Software that will utilize the Cit 's network? Yes or No No.. ^t4 8.Is the amendment going to result in the disposal of an asset?(Yes or No) 9.An additional comments? -- -- No.Check was posted in CR25-001298 Total Amendment Request $ (11,600) Every effort should be made to avoid reopening the budget for an amendment. Departments will need to provide backup and appear before the City Council to justify budget amendments. Budget amendments are intended for emergency or mandatory changes to the original balanced budget. Changes to the original balanced budget may cause a funding shortfall. C� fIEN MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Consent Agenda From: Mike Barton, Parks & Recreation Meeting Date: June 17, 2025 Presenter: Consent Agenda Estimated Time: Consent Agenda Topic: FY2025 Budget Amendment for BAPA Cash Donation to City Background: Over the years, we have worked closely with the Boise Area Pickleball Association (BAPA) to further the sport of pickleball in the Treasure Valley. Since BAPA was first formed, many courts have been added, including those in Meridian. There have been many increased opportunities to play pickleball and an increased awareness of the sport; Therefore, BAPA felt they had fulfilled their mission, and it was time to dissolve. Because of our close relationship with BAPA,they have donated their remaining funds of$17,500 to the City to purchase windscreens around the pickleball fences at Settlers Park ($4,950), 4 portable nets to be used at Settlers Park ($400), and 10 pickleball paddle holders at various sites ($550). The remaining funds ($11,600) will go directly into our Care Enough to Share program. This budget amendment will place the funds in a GL so we can purchase the items that were agreed upon. Council Action: Approve this budget amendment as presented. E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park for Meridian Fine Arts Festival (� E N MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Emily Kane, Deputy City Attorney Meeting Date: June 17, 2025 Presenter: Bill Nary, City Attorney Estimated Time: 0.5 minutes Topic: Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park For Special Event- Meridian Fine Arts Festival Recommended Council Action: Please approve and authorize mayor to sign agreement. Background: Agreement establishing terms and conditions of use of Kleiner Park for Meridian Fine Arts Festival at the following times: • Setup on June 27, 2025, from 8:00 a.m.to 9:00 p.m. • On-site security personnel from completion of set-up on June 27, 2025, overnight and until event opening on June 28, 2025. • Event open to the public on June 28, 2025, from 9:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m. • On-site security personnel from event close on June 28, 2025, overnight and until event opening on June 29, 2025. • Event open to the public on June 29, 2025, from 10:00 a.m.to 4:00 p.m. • Tear-down on June 29, 2025, from 4:00 p.m.to 9:00 p.m. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT This Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park For Special Event (hereinafter"Agreement") is made this 17th day of June, 2025 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho (hereinafter"City"), and Meridian Fine Art Festival, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Idaho (hereinafter"Organizer"). WHEREAS,City and Organizer are mutually interested in enhancing the Meridian community's quality of life by providing and supporting special event opportunities for members of the Meridian and greater communities; WHEREAS,City and Organizer recognize that publicly-held facilities are resources requiring heightened stewardship and protection; WHEREAS,Organizer has agreed to be responsible for any costs incurred by City in the course of the special event hosted by Organizer at Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park ("Park"), located at 1900 N. Records Avenue, in Meridian, Idaho, between June 27 and June 29, 2025; and WHEREAS,the Meridian City Council finds that it is fiscally responsible and in the best interest of the community to enter into a contractual agreement establishing the terms and conditions of Organizer's use of Park; NOW,THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and in consideration of the recitals above, which are incorporated herein, City and Organizer agree as follows: I.PERMISSION GRANTED. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, City hereby grants to Organizer permission to utilize Park at the time, place, and manner set forth in this Agreement and in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-25-0059 for a large-scale special event known as Agreement for Use of Kleiner Park For Special Event- Treasure Valley Fine Art Festival ("Event"). II.OBLIGATIONS OF ORGANIZER. A. Reasonable use. Organizer shall employ best efforts to ensure that its use of Park and Park facilities, amenities, infrastructure, and/or vegetation is appropriate and reasonable. Where Organizer's use of Park and Park facilities, infrastructure, and/or vegetation causes disproportionately excessive damage to same, Organizer shall reimburse City for the cost or proportionate cost of necessary repairs and/or replacement. Organizer shall exercise best efforts to see that any and all use of Park, to the extent reserved by Organizer, is in compliance with all laws and with City's policies regarding use of City parks and/or facilities, including, but not limited to, policies be adopted or enacted by the Director of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE I B. Permitting. In addition to compliance with all terms and provisions of this Agreement, Organizer shall separately obtain and comply with each and all of the following permits, as required by law: 1. City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit for Large Scale Special Event; 2. Any and all applicable licenses, permits, inspections, and/or certifications from the Ada County Highway District; 3. Any and all applicable licenses, permits, inspections, and/or certifications from the Central District Health Department; 4. Any and all reservations, permits, and inspections required by the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department. C. Fees,costs. If staffing or extended hours are required for the protection of public safety or maintenance of Park due to Event, Organizer shall reimburse City for all staffing costs within fourteen(14) days of City's invoice for such costs. If Organizer fails to timely reimburse City pursuant to such invoice, the City may decline to provide extra-duty personnel staffing, decline to reserve City facilities, release Organizer's reservations of City facilities for the Event, or decline to allow the subsequent use of City facilities for Event or any iteration thereof. D. Time and place. The permission extended under this Agreement shall apply to the areas of Park detailed on the event site plan approved by City under City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-25-0059: 1. Setup on June 27, 2025, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 2. On-site security personnel from completion of set-up on June 27, 2025, overnight and until event opening on June 28, 2025. 3. Event open to the public on June 28, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 4. On-site security personnel from event close on June 28, 2025, overnight and until event opening on June 29, 2025. 5. Event open to the public on June 29, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 6. Tear-down on June 29, 2025, from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pursuant to City Code, Park shall be closed between dusk and dawn, except for overnight security personnel in the vendor area of the Event as permitted by Order of the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department Director, set forth in this Agreement. E. Manner. The permission extended under this Agreement shall be subject to all terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement, in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-25-0059, and in any applicable laws and policies, including, without limitation, the Meridian Parks and Recreation Event Planners' Handbook. Such terms and conditions shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: 1. The public must have general access to all areas of Park at all times during the event, so long as such access does not unduly interfere with Organizer's use of Park for Event. 2. Driving or parking vehicles on non-designated driving or parking surfaces shall be prohibited. 3. Where activities or equipment related to Event damage or destroy turf, landscaping, sprinklers, or other Park infrastructure or facilities, or otherwise require City to incur AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL,EVENT PAGE 2 additional expenses, Organizer shall reimburse City for all costs of repair, replacement, or expense within fourteen (14) days of City's invoice for such costs. 4. The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department, under the authority granted to him by Meridian City Code section 5-1-4(W)(1), shall, and hereby does, order that the Park closing time shall be waived as to overnight security personnel for the Event. Security personnel for the Event may remain in the Park after park closure on June 27, 2025 until park opening on June 28, 2025, and after park closure on June 28, 2025 until park opening on June 29, 2025 for the purpose of securing goods left overnight in the Park by vendors. 5. Organizer shall make every effort to provide and maintain access to Event for persons with disabilities. 6. No smoking shall be allowed in Park, except in designated parking areas. 7. Used water, grease, charcoal, and other materials and supplies must be carried out of Park at the conclusion of Event and properly disposed of pursuant to the requirements of the Idaho Food Code. Used water, grease, charcoal, and other materials and supplies may not be disposed of at Park. 8. Organizer is authorized to post signs for the purpose of identifying, promoting, advertising, or directing patrons to Event as represented and approved in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-25-0059. Organizer acknowledges that the permission extended by City under this Agreement to post signs shall extend only to the locations approved in City of Meridian Temporary Use Permit no. TUP-25-0059, and that it is unlawful to post a sign identifying, promoting, advertising, or directing patrons to Event without the permission of the owner of such property. Organizer shall remove all signs identifying,promoting, advertising, or directing patrons to Event by 9:00 p.m. on June 29, 2025. 9. Organizer shall provide a medical services station at Event. Such station shall be clearly marked and accessible to all Event participants. At least two (2)personnel trained and certified to provide first aid shall be at the Event and available if needed at all times. F. Insurance. Organizer shall submit to City proof of an insurance policy issued by an insurance company licensed to do business in Idaho protecting Organizer, Organizer's employees, and Organizer's agents from all claims for damages to property and bodily injury, including death, which may arise during or in connection with Event, including Event set-up and tear-down. Such insurance shall name City as an additionally insured party, and shall afford at least one million dollars ($1,000,000.00)per person bodily injury, one million dollars ($1,000,000.00)per occurrence bodily injury, and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence property damage. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City as set forth in this Agreement or any permit. If City becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits herein provided due to the actions or omissions of Organizer or any Organizer employee, agent, contractor, official, officer, servant, guest, and/or invitee, or any participant in or observer of Event or related activities, Organizer covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL,EVENT PAGE 3 harmless City from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property. III.OBLIGATIONS OF CITY. A. Facility operation. Except as otherwise set forth herein, City shall provide general maintenance, mowing, irrigation, and custodial services with regard to Park facilities, infrastructure, and vegetation. City shall provide all necessary utilities and services to Park facilities, including, but not limited to, electricity, potable water, sewage service, and/or typical waste and refuse removal. City shall cause the repair and/or replacement of any and all Park facilities, infrastructure, and/or vegetation that are physically damaged by acts of nature. To the extent that the cause of damage is attributable to Event activities, Organizer shall be responsible for the cost of repair or replacement. B. Primary Source of Contact for City. City shall provide Organizer the name, e-mail address, and telephone number of specific City personnel (hereinafter"City Contact") who shall serve as City's primary contact between City and Organizer for all day-to-day matters regarding set-up, operation, and tear-down of in Park. City Contact for Event shall be: City Contact: Skyler Cook, Recreation Coordinator Meridian Parks and Recreation Department E-mail: scook@meridiancity.org Office Phone: 208-888-3579 IV.GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Notice. Communication between Organizer and the City Contact regarding day-to-day matters shall occur via e-mail or telephone. All other notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, or via e-mail, addressed as follows: City: Organizer: City of Meridian Lauren Kistner Attn: City Clerk Meridian Fine Art Festival, LLC 33 E. Broadway Avenue 10382 Lake Shore Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Nampa, Idaho 83686 cityclerk@meridiancity.org meridianfineartfest@gmail.com B. Public park. The parties hereto expressly acknowledge that Park is a public space, the management and scheduling of which shall at all times be within the sole purview of City. City shall have the right to allow the use of Park, and close all or any portion of Park, for any and all purposes and under any and all conditions. C. No right to exclude conveyed. Any exclusive use granted to Organizer by this Agreement shall include neither the right to exclude any law-abiding person from Park where such person is not interfering with Organizer's use thereof, nor the right to interfere with any person's concurrent, lawful use of Park where such concurrent use does not conflict or interfere with Organizer's use. At all times Organizer shall be on an equal footing with the general public regarding its use of Park. Organizer shall exercise any exclusive use granted AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE 4 by this Agreement only in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and in accordance with any and all applicable laws and City policies. D. Assignment. Organizer shall not assign or sublet all or any portion of Organizer's interest in this Agreement or any privilege or right hereunder, either voluntarily or involuntarily, without the prior written consent of City. This Agreement and each and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations, legal representative, successors, and assigns of the parties. E. No agency. Neither Organizer nor Organizer's employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees shall be considered agents of City in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever in their use and occupancy of Park. F. Indemnification. Organizer and each and all of Organizer's employees, agents, contractors, officials, officers, servants, guests, and/or invitees, including any and all participants in Event or related activities, shall indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for any and all losses, claims, actions,judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by Organizer or any Organizer employee, agent, contractor, official, officer, servant, guest, and/or invitee, or any participant in or observer of Organizer programming, at or in its use of Park or any lack of maintenance or repair thereon and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City. G. No warranty. City makes no warranty or promise as to the condition, safety, usefulness, or habitability of the premises; Organizer accepts Park for use as is, both at the Effective Date of this Agreement and throughout the course of Event and all related activities. H. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, City and Organizer shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. I. Attorney Fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. J. Time of the essence. The parties shall fulfill obligations described in this Agreement in a timely manner, as set forth herein. The parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a default of this Agreement. K. Termination. 1. Grounds. Grounds for termination of this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to: an act or omission which breaches any term of this Agreement; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance of the terms of this Agreement; or a change in or occurrence of AGREEMENT FOR USE OF KLEINER PARK FOR SPECIAL EVENT PAGE 5 circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare. 2. Process. City may terminate this Agreement by providing twenty-four (24) hours notice of intention to terminate. Such notice shall include a description of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination. A twenty-four (24) hour cure period shall commence upon provision of the notice of intention to terminate. If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this Agreement shall be terminated upon mailing or e- mailing of notice of termination. L. Breach. Any act or omission by either party which breaches any term of this Agreement may provide grounds for termination. In the event of breach,the City may also decline to provide extra-duty personnel staffing, decline to reserve City facilities, release existing reservations of City facilities, or decline to allow the subsequent use of City facilities for Event or any iteration thereof. M. Construction and severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. N. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. O. Applicable law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho. P. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by both Organizer and by Meridian City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. ORGANIZER: BY: �4� I Lauren Kistner Organizer, Meridian Fine Art Festival, LLC CITY OF MERIDIAN: Attest: BY: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-17-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clem 6-17-2025 AGK};E:MEiNT J40K USH OF KLh:INEK PARK FOR SPECIAL.EvEsNT PAGE 6 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ada County Highway District Cost Share Permit for Landscape Medians on Ustick Rd., Black Cat Rd. to Ten Mile Rd. (� E N MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Consent Agenda From: Mike Barton, Parks &Recreation Meeting Date: June 17, 2025 Presenter: Consent Agenda Estimated Time: Consent Agenda Topic: ACHD Cost Share Permit for Landscape Medians on Ustick Road, Black Cat Rd to Ten Mile Rd Background: As previously discussed with the council, we've been working with ACHD on landscaping the center medians on Ustick Rd from Black Cat Rd to Ten Mile Rd. The design is complete, and we were able to get costs for the work. The total cost for the work is estimated at$234,932.87, which means, after a credit of$131,826.75 for work not being performed by ACHD,there will be a deficit of$103,106.12 the city will owe to ACHD after the work is complete. Installation of patterned concrete, landscaping and irrigation is anticipated in FY26. The deficit amount of$103,106.12 owed to ACHD plus a contingency amount is being requested in our FY26 budget. This cost share agreement memorializes costs and ongoing maintenance and other roles and responsibilities between ACHD and the City. This cost share agreement has been reviewed and approved by Legal. Council Action: Approve the Cost Share Agreement as presented ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COST SHARE PERMIT 3775 Adams Street ACHD Contact Person: Garden City, Idaho 83714 ROW and Project Phone (208) 387-6280 Management Facsimile (208) 387-6289 Name: Seth Jarsky, Sr. Project Manager 3775 Adams Street A$F Garden City Idaho 83714 Phone: (208) 387-6223 Air ACHD Date of Permit: ACHD Project No.: Permit No.: 52 322024/522025 Capitalized terms that are not defined in this Permit shall have the meanings given to them in the ACHD Cost Share Ordinance No. 215. L PERMITTEE INFORMATION This permit is granted to: City of Meridian Partnering Agency Contact 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Person: Mike Barton, Parks Meridian, ID 83642 Superintendent Phone: 208-440-8742 Email: mbarton meridiancit .or IL ROAD PROJECT AND APPROVED NON-TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS Name/Location of ACHD Road Project: Ustick Rd, Black Cat Rd to Ten Mile Rd. ACHD Project 322024/522025 as depicted in the project plans attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. 1 of 11 Approved Non-Transportation Components: Pursuant to this Permit, ACHD authorizes, and, as a condition of issuing this Permit, requires, the following Non-Transportation Components: 1) Design, Construction, and Perpetual Maintenance of the following_: • Patterned concrete with "landscapingpods", landscaping and irrigation, which includes irrigation lines and meter pits, in the center medians per the plans from Ardurra dated March 28, 2025. All of the aforementioned is depicted in Exhibit B. ACHD has received and approved the design, construction, and perpetual maintenance of the patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including the irrigation lines and meter pits, in the center medians per the plans from Ardurra dated March 28, 2025. In accordance with Ordinance 215, the foregoing mentioned installation of patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation that consists of irrigation lines and meter pits are referred to as the "Non-Transportation Components." III. ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OR REAL PROPERTY Conditions of acquisition/contribution of right-of-way or real property by Partnering Agency and/or reimbursement to ACHD by Partnering Agency for said acquisition: None. ACHD has already acquired or is in the process of acquiring the right-of-way necessary to incorporate the Non-Transportation Components into the Project. Therefore, the acquisition of real property is not required of the Partnering Agency and is not part of the Non-Transportation Components. IV. DESIGN OF NON-TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS 710 Party responsible for obtaining plans/design for Non-Transportation Components: Partnering Agency has submitted completed and approved plans/designs of the Non-Transportation Components, which consist of designs for the patterned concrete with"landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including the irrigation lines and meter pits, in the center medians per the plans from Ardurra dated March 28, 2025, described in Section II. The Partnering Agency has submitted the plans/designs of the Non-Transportation Components and receive approval from ACHD as to the plan/designs prior to installation. 2of11 If Partnering Agency is responsible for providing plans/design, deadline for submitting plans/designs to ACHD for approval: The Partnering Agency shall be solely responsible for all design costs for the Non-Transportation Components, if any. The Partnering Agency shall receive no credits in connection with the design costs for the Non-Transportation Components other than the credit for the stamped concrete and base materials costs ACHD would incur in the amount of$131,826.75 (estimated in communication dated April 30, 2025) if median islands were not landscaped. The total project costs are estimated at $234,932.87, leaving a deficit of $103,106.12 that the City will owe to ACHD when the project is complete. Completion of the installation of the patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including irrigation lines and meter pits is anticipated in FY 2026 and the deficit amount of$103,106.12 owed to ACHD will be included in the City's FY26 budget. Additional conditions:All designs/plans submitted by Partnering Agency must comply with (i) established engineering standards, including the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC); (ii) the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ("AASHTO'); (iii) the Cost-Share Ordinance No. 215; (iv) all adopted ACHD rules, regulations, and policies; and (v) all state and federal laws. No designs shall be considered final until they are approved in writing by ACHD. Any modifications to the deadlines set forth above must be approved in writing by ACHD. By approving such design or construction of the Non-Transportation Components to the extent such Non-Transportation Components were not designed or constructed by ACHD. Allocation of design costs for Non-Transportation Components (including, if applicable, any credits provided to Partnership Agency and application of any federal funding) and for reimbursement, if applicable: The Partnering Agency shall be solely responsible for all design costs for the Non-Transportation Components, if any. The Partnering Agency shall receive no credits in connection with the design costs for the Non-Transportation Components other than the credit for the stamped concrete and base materials costs ACHD would incur in the amount of $131,826.75 (estimated in communication dated April 30, 2025 attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit C) if median islands were not landscaped. The total project costs are estimated at $234,932.87, leaving a deficit of$103,106.12 that the City will owe to ACHD when the project is complete. Completion of the installation of the patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including irrigation lines and meter pits is anticipated in FY 2026 and the deficit amount of$103,106.12 owed to ACHD will be included in the City's FY26 budget. V — V �1 0 V. CONSTRUCTION OF NON-TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS 3of11 Description of construction work approved by ACHD to be completed by Partnering Agency (if applicable): (In addition to description, refer to designs and plans attached to this Permit as Exhibits, if applicable. If designs and plans are not complete at the time of issuance of this Permit, they must be approved in writing by ACHD and shall be incorporated into this Permit.) N/A Additional conditions: (1) Partnering Agency will not allow any liens to attach to any right-of-way, improvements, or any otherproperty ofACHD as a result of any laborperformed or materials supplied in connection with the construction of the Non-Transportation Components. (2) Partnering Agency shall be responsible for obtaining all permits required by ACHD in connection with any construction of the Non- Transportation Components. (3) Partnering Agency's construction shall not negatively impact ACHO's construction of the Transportation Components or ACHD's Road Project schedule in any way. (4) Any amendment to the designs and plans must be approved in writing by ACHD. (5) All construction of the Non-Transportation Components shall be in accordance with the designs/plans approved by ACHD. (6) All construction by Partnering Agency will comply with (i) established engineering standards including the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC); (ii) the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO'); (iii) the Cost Share Ordinance No. 215; (iv) all adopted ACHD rules, regulations and policies;and(v) all state and federal laws. If Partnering Agency is responsible for all or a part of the construction of the Non-Transportation Components: N/A a. Date for submitting Partnering Agency's contractors and engineers to ACHD for approval: b. Date for submitting Partnering Agency's contractors' and engineers' estimates to ACHD approval: c. Date for submitting Partnering Agency's contractors' and engineers' contracts to ACHD for approval: Any modifications to the deadlines set forth above must be approved in writing by ACHD. Allocation of construction costs for Non-Transportation Components, reconstruction costs of Transportation Components necessitated by the incorporation of Non-Transportation Components into the Road Project, ACHD construction, maintenance, administration, and overrun costs (including, if applicable, any credits provided to Partnering Agency and application of any federal funding), and time for reimbursement, if applicable: The Partnering Agency shall be solely responsible for all design costs for the Non-Transportation Components, if any. The Partnering Agency shall receive no credits in connection with the design costs for the Non-Transportation Components other than the credit for the stamped concrete and base materials costs ACHD would incur in the amount of$131,826.75 (estimated in communication dated April 30, 2025) if median islands were not landscaped. The total project costs are estimated at $234,932.87, leaving a deficit of $103,106.12 that the City will owe to ACHD when the project is complete. Completion of the installation of the patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including irrigation lines and meter pits is anticipated in FY 2026 and the deficit amount of $103,106.12 owed to ACHD will be included in the City's FY26 budget. If ACHD performs the construction of the Non-Transportation Components, then the Partnering Agency 4of11 shall reimburse ACHD for the actual costs of all materials used, the cost of the relocation of any utilities necessitated by installation of the Non-Transportation Components, including but not limited to the construction costs of patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including irrigation lines and meter pits, in the center medians, where applicable. Payment by Partnering Agency shall be made to ACHD within 30 days following submission of any invoice by ACHD to Partnering Agency identifying such charges. Relocation of utilities to be completed by Partnering Agency(if any): Partnering Agency shall be solely responsible for the cost of relocating any utilities required in connection with the placement, incorporation, or construction of the Non-Transportation Components. Storm water provisions (if applicable): The construction and installation of the patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including irrigation lines and meter pits, in the center medians within ACHD's project shall be designed so as to prevent storm water from accumulating and ponding. Additional conditions: Upon a determination by ACHD that the incorporation into the Road Project of Partnering Agency's Non-Transportation Components will have an adverse effect on storm water quantity or quality, Partnering Agency shall be solely responsible for either mitigating or funding the mitigation of any such adverse effects in a means determined by or acceptable to ACHD. Schedule for completion of Road Project: At this time, ACHD's schedule for completion of the Transportation and Non-Transportation Components of the Road Project completion is unknown but estimated to be sometime in 2025-2026. VI. MAINTENANCE OF NON-TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS 10 Maintenance requirements of Non-Transportation Components by Partnering Agency: Partnering Agency shall be, and is hereby, granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to maintain, repair, and replace the Non-Transportation Components, subject to the provisions of this Permit and during the term of this Permit. This includes the perpetual maintenance, repair, and replacement of the patterned concrete with "landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including irrigation lines and meter pits, described in Section II. Partnering Agency shall cause the Non-Transportation Components to be operated and maintained in good functioning order during the term of this Permit, in accordance with applicable law, the approved designs/plans, Partnering Agency's patterned concrete with"landscaping pods", landscaping and irrigation, including irrigation lines and meter pits, must meet ACHD standards and specifications, and industry 5ofII standards. This obligation includes, without limitation, grass and lawn care, pruning or replacement of gravel, trees, and shrubs, clean up of litter and debris, weed removal, and application for shrubs and trees, and groundcover, as applicable. Any replacement and/or installation by Partnering Agency of additional improvements shall be accomplished in accordance with designs, plans, and specifications approved in advanced an in writing by ACHD, in its discretion, and as required to satisfy applicable laws, its policies, and good engineering and landscaping practices. Additional conditions: 1. This Permit does not extend to Partnering Agency the Right to use any part of the ACHD Road Project area to the exclusion ofACHD for any use within its jurisdiction, authority, and discretion or of others to the extent authorized by law. 2. In accessing any part of the Road project that has been accepted as an open public highway (as the term "highway" is defined in Idaho Code Section 40-109(5), Partnering Agency's authorized use is subject to the rights of the public to use the highway. 3. The rights granted hereunder are subject to and subordinate to the rights of holders of easements of records and the statutory rights of utilities to use the right-of-way. 4. This Permit does not preclude or impede the ability of ACHD to enter into or grant easements or license agreements allowing third parties to access the Road Project area, or the ability of ACHD to redesign, reconstruct, relocate, maintain, and improve the Road Project and right-of-way as it determines necessary, in its sole discretion. 5. In consideration of the license granted by this Permit, Partnering Agency expressly covenants and agrees that the license granted herein is temporary and merely a permissive use of the ACHD right- of-way pursuant to the terms of this Permit. Partnering Agency assumes the risk that the license granted herein may be terminated before Partnering Agency has realized the economic benefit oj' the cost of installing, constructing, repairing, or maintaining the Non-Transportation Components, and by signing and accepting this Permit, Partnering Agency hereby waives and estops itself from asserting any claim, including damages or reimbursement, that the license is in any way irrevocable because partnering Agency has expended funds on the Non-Transportation Components and the Permit has not been in effect for a period sufficient for Partnering Agency to realize the economic benefit from such expenditures. 6. In the event Partnering Agency fails to replace, repair, maintain, and care for the Non- Transportation Components, ACHD shall have the following remedies in addition to any other recovery in law or in equity,provided that ACHD first gives Partnering Agency 30 days'notice and Partnering Agency fails to remedy such failure: (i)ACHD may revoke this Permit; (ii)ACHD may replace, maintain, and/or care for the Non-Transportation Components, and Partnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD fully for all associated costs; (iii) ACHD may remove, alter, redesign, or reconstruct the Non-Transportation Components or any part of the ACHD Road Project (including without limitation the right-of-way), or in the case of landscaping, replace the Non-Transportation Components with hardscape, and Partnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD fully for all associated costs; and (iv)ACHD may refuse to issue any further Cost Share Permits or any other permits for future ACHD Road Projects until Partnering Agency complies with the conditions of the Permit. In addition, in the event of an emergency caused by Partnering Agency's failure to perform the required maintenance, ACHD may immediately perform any and all emergency repairs or take other measures in connection with an emergency and Partnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD fully.for all associated costs. 6of11 VIL TERM Term of Permit: This Permit shall be perpetual, until terminated or revoked pursuant to the provisions of this Permit. Upon termination or revocation of this Permit, upon the request of ACHD, Partnering Agency will either, as directed by ACHD, (i) promptly remove the Non-Transportation Components and restore the underlying area to at least the condition present as of the date of this Permit repairing and restoring all portions of ACHD's right-of-way, personal property, and real property, if any, that are damaged during such removal activities; or (ii) reimburse ACHD for its cost of redesigning, replacing, and/or reconstructing the right-of- way or real property underlying the Non-Transportation Components. Any portion of the Non- Transportation Components that remain in ACHD right-of-way or on ACHD real property 90 days after termination or revocation of this Permit shall be deemed abandoned, and ACHD shall have the right to remove them or redesign, replace, and reconstruct the right-of-way or real property underlying them and char e all costs to Partnering Agency . IF VII.ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO PROJECT30 Additional provisions: This permit provides terms upon which the incorporation of the Non-Transportation Components into the Road Project is approved. IX. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF PERMIT Mi 1. This Permit is issued conditioned on the Partnering Agency's compliance with ACHD's Cost Share Ordinance No. 215, the terms and conditions of this Permit and all applicable ACHD policies, standards and specifications and all certifications made by the Partnering Agency's pursuant to this Permit. 2. This Permit is subject to the provisions of state and federal law and all ACHD Ordinance, including but not limited to the Cost Share Ordinance No. 215, in effect as of the date of issuance of this Permit and those that may be adopted after the issuance of this Permit (the "Applicable Law"). In the event of any conflict between this Permit and Applicable Law, Applicable Law shall govern. hi the event that any part of the obligations of the Partnering Agency or of ACHD in connection with this Permit or the Road Project are determined to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining obligations of the Permittee set forth in this Permit shall still be applicable. Further amendments and restatements of the Cost Share Ordinance shall not be applicable to this Permit. 3. If any portion of the ACHD Road Project (including without limitation any portion of the right-of-way and ACHD personal property therein) is damaged as a result of Permittee's action or inaction with regard to the construction, operation, and/or maintenance of the Fiber Optic Facilities or the failure or neglect to construct, operate, and/or maintain the Fiber Optic Facilities, then the Permittee shall, at its sole cost and expense, correct such deficiency and restore the area to the same condition it was in prior 7of11 thereto, and if Permittee or its successors or assigns shall fail or neglect to commence such correction and restoration within twenty-four (24) hours of notification thereof, ACHD may proceed to do so, in which event Permittee shall reimburse ACHD for the costs and expenses thereof, including, without limitation, reasonable compensation for the use of staff and equipment of ACHD. 4. Partnering Agency shall be liable to ACHD for any and all damages, fines, fees, obligations to third parties, costs, expenses, attorney fees, or any other liabilities whatsoever directly resulting from the Partnering Agency's failure to comply with any provision of this Permit and/or Cost Share Ordinance No. 215. Without limiting the foregoing in any manner, in the event Partnering Agency fails to comply with any provision of this Permit, then following any applicable notice and opportunity to cure set forth herein, ACHD shall have the right, in addition to all other rights and remedies elsewhere in this Permit, to redesign, replace, and/or reconstruct the Non Transportation Components and/or the right-of-way or real property underling the Non-Transportation Components, and in such event, Partnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD for all associated cost. The obligations in this Section shall survive the expiration, revocation, and/or cancellation of this Permit for any reason. 5. Partnering Agency may delegate any of its responsibilities hereunder to any third party so long as it gives prior written notice to ACHD that specifies in detail what responsibilities are being delegated and identifies the third party. Notwithstanding any delegation to a third party, the Partnering Agency shall remain and shall be ultimately responsible for the third party's compliance with the terms of this Permit, and no delegation shall absolve the Partnering Agency of any duties or obligations of this Permit in any way. In addition, Partnering Agency fully assumes all legal risks of determining whether any such delegation is property under applicable law and/or regulations, and shall not be absolved of any responsibilities under this Permit if it is unable to complete or maintain any such delegation for any reason. 6. Partnering Agency will protect, defend, indemnify, and hold ACHD and its officers, directors, employees, members, and agents harmless from and against any and all liability, suits, losses, damages, claims, actions, costs, and expenses of any nature, including court costs and attorney fees, arising from or out of any acts or omissions of the Permittee, its agents, or contractors related to or in connection with the Non-Transportation Components and the exercise of any privileges or performance of any obligations by the Partnering Agency pursuant to the terms of this Permit. This duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless is subject to the limitations of Idaho law, including Article VIII, section 3, Idaho Constitution and Title 6, chapter 9, Idaho Code (Idaho Tort Claims Act). Partnering Agency's obligations in this Section shall survive the expiration, revocation, and/or cancellation of this Permit for any reason. 7. In the event the Non-Transportation Components will or may necessitate future maintenance, repair, relocation, or replacement that is not subject to this Permit, ACHD shall in its discretion issue Partnering Agency an amended or an additional Cost Share Permit to perform such work. 8. ACHD shall at all times have the right to relocate, reconstruct, remove, or redesign any and all improvements that are part of the Road Project. ACHD will use its best efforts to advise Partnering Agency of any anticipated actions within the Road Project that would be likely to cause a relocation, modification, or other adaptation of any of the Non-Transportation Components, and the parties, to the extent reasonably possible, shall agree to a priority schedule regarding the same and shall attempt to cooperate with respect to planning and coordination as related to any such relocation, modification, or 8of11 other adaptation of any of the Non-Transportation Components. If ACHD ultimately determines that any part of the Road project must be relocated, reconstructed, removed, or redesigned, then Partnering Agency, at its sole cost and expense, shall be responsible for relocating, reconstructing, removing, or redesigning the Non-Transportation Components, as required by ACHD, which shall be accomplished by the Partnering Agency according to designs, plans, and specifications approved by ACHD in writing prior to any such work. Partnering Agency may also elect to remove all or a part of the Non- Transportation Components in lieu of any relocation, modification, or adaptation. Partnering Agency assumes any and all costs of itself and ACHD relating to any future relocation of the Non- Transportation Components. 9. ACHD shall at all times have the right to revoke this and any other Permit granted to the Partnering Agency to access the Highway or public right-of-way or real property. In addition, ACHD may immediately perform any and all emergency repairs or take other measures in connection with an emergency, in which case the Partnering Agency shall reimburse ACHD fully for all associated costs. 10. This Permit shall immediately be revocable and/or cancelable by ACHD by providing written notice to the Partnering Agency upon the occurrence of any of the following: (i) a determination by ACHD that any of the information submitted by the Partnering Agency in the Cost Share Application is false or inaccurate in any manner; (ii) a determination by ACHD that the Partnering Agency has failed to comply with any term or provision of this Permit; (iii) a determination by ACHD that the Partnering Agency has failed to replace, maintain, and/or care for the Non-Transportation Components, as required by the terms of this Permit. Except in an emergency situation, ACHD shall provide the Partnering Agency with thirty (30) days notice of the issue and an opportunity to comply prior to exercising such rights. 11. The issuance of this Permit shall in no way obligate ACHD to provide Partnering Agency with additional permits or rights, nor shall ACHD be obligation to utilize provisions or rights set forth in this Permit in connection with additional permits or rights that it may elect to provide to Partnering Agency in the future. 12. All exhibits and any addenda to this Permit are incorporated herein. 15. This Permit is conditioned upon the signature of ACHD and the Permittee below. SIGNATURES AN 9of11 This Cost Share Permit is issued by the Ada County Highway District on the date set forth above: Ada County Highway District: The person signing below represents that he or she has the authority on behalf of ACHD to issue this Permit and bind ACHD to the terms set forth herein. By: Ryan Head Its: Director—Ada County Highway District Acceptance/certification by Permittee: The person signing below represents that he or she has the authority on behalf of the Partnering Agency to accept and agree to the terms of this Permit and bind the Partnering Agency to the terms set forth herein. By: Robert E. Simison 6-17-2025 Its: Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson City Clerk 6-17-2025 10of11 EXHIBITS Exhibit A - ACHD Project 322024/522025 Project Plans Exhibit B—Design Plans by Ardurra dated March 28, 2025. Exhibit C—Correspondence discussion between City and ACHD regarding credit and Non-Transportation costs dated April 30, 2025 11 of 11 EXHIBIT "A' d fi8f i d YYg�€€€i f Fit F Fi a m ill # y " 1 z fit,, 3f7o [�,of ar a�i ati+tr +tf anti I F Y- �ad litt �ii�r�i�i !itt litE litt !itt e CD o �® e C C D m W S �� >C Z c�CL o ?? On 2 1 . N n CQ N om N41 B CXL co Cal Z PO <D n q i �. x ® fl- M. � f D T m co r j� �9.f"i a .ten%"d�'q'o 8$. ;N y"'_ � • a .11 Eh 41 z 7� egg m 4S n g & m w O ci na o Q w e x 2 _ w N a SE� �v� w p m�?� m"c o y w � _ a♦,� 3 tF v w m p 0awg�l ;� ' m O _ � NoraY«+e_ �taoaaya�n nr.ye.rr. M/.m•a.we I uua M:�•: 100% Exhibit B R,wxr SCxeoU�ui �I L — � m,axmvuur<xxra we,mn swxcEroxmnar r nr�ur-m O O E au, ecu m I ��a F '<----�� F xoousunE.,=swurauu snuwmu.asrvasw.aexoaauwume zu..sre nx,n �u .a u F— F F _F . m __ ___ a__ mnc>&rs awaxr� mrurrxxxue seE mrtu,=a un,uEseE wurmm=mr O __ _ _�—— —� _ _ _ _ Q ureuasEamm,aus wrtauw=aiianrsn nr�se - --__ RROZD — _ — a ainiou rv:,�=nsrua auxsiw. • mm r x mx rm IMIERIPI3CHE0ULE g_ � -_ eve ffsc xru mwu ory auras F � u.wo- �Ma®-m,ouoa®-ssro MEDIAN VEGETATION AT N THAMES AVE AND USTICK ROAD MEDIAN VEGETATION AT N TOWERBRIDGE WAY AND USTICK ROAD — — — — E. MEDIAN VEGETATION AT USTICK ROAD AND NW GLENNFIELD WAY �a _x- 1 ���1 o MEDIAN VEGETATION AT NE GLENNFIELD WAY AND USTICK ROAD Exhibit B �r.oE"G'"EEAs LANDSCAPE PLANoaMEDIAN VEGETATION PLAN Ada County Highway District 3775 Project Number:521052 USTICK ROAD,TEN MILE TO LINDER Sheet 36 Of 77 FRI TYPICAL MEDIAN HARDSCAPE LAYOUT TYPICAL MEDIAN IRRIGATION LAYOUT SGaL[-t.to 5Cu[-t.to AA aNIO �o TYPICAL MEDIAN VEGETATION LAYOUT�, � II h y �mE - -- ' BOULDER DETAIL WITH PLANTINGS 2 IRRIGATION SLEEVING 9 CONTROLLER�I NODE BT ON VALV " 4 POP-UP SPRAY r o LANDSCAPE PLAN 1.—NEE. Oi 1/202 LL Oi iz0 3 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Ada County Highway District 3775 a3,,. Project Number:521052 USTICK ROAD,TEN MILE TO LINDER Sheet 37 Of 77 Exhibit C Capital Paving Company, Inc <510. PO Box 190810 Boise, ID 83719 IF Fed ID No-82-0342640 •Reg Idaho Contractor No-RCE-4060• Public Works No-PWC-C-12069-U-4 Letter of Transmittal #69 To: Ada County Highway District Attention: Nick Wheeler Project Name: Ustick Road, Black Cat Road to Ten Mile Road Project#: CT225-02 Date: 4/23/2025 Copies Bid Item Bid Schedule Description 1 1 RFC #7 -Median Island Changes Pricing These Are Transmitted As Checked Below: Transmitted Via: X For Approval X Email For Your Use USPS As Requested In Person Request for Information X I Request for Price Change Comments: Please feel free to call me with any questions at 208-573-3966 Signed: ;'� li John Mitchell, Project Manager ACHD Request for Change (RFC) Project# Project Name RFC# CT225-02 Ustick Road, Black Cat to Ten Mile 7 Requested By Title Company Name Date John Mitchell Project Manager Capital Paving Company, Inc 4/23/2025 Describe Proposed Change Median island landscaping and patterned concrete Reason for Change The City of Meridian requested change order pricing to add landscaping and patterned concrete to the median islands. Benefit to Project-(Dollars,Time,Quality,Other) NA Proposed Net Change to Contract Cost-(Attach supporting documentation to justify) See attached supporting documentation Request for Time-(Attach Justification) If this RFC is approved,we request that 10 working days be added to the planned completion date for this project. Contractor Printed Name Contractor Signature Date Capital Paving Company, Incge�& ewe&" 4/23/2025 ACHD Review Date Received by ACHD Result of Review ❑RFC Approved ❑RFC Denied for the Following Reason Click or tap here to enter text. ACHD Printed Name Signature Date <f>' Capital Paving Company, Inc PO Box 190810 Boise, ID 83719 Fed ID No-82-0342640•Reg Idaho Conctractor No-RCE-4060•Public Works No-PWC-C-12069-U-4 To: Ada County Highway District Attention: Nick Wheeler Project Name: Ustick Road, Black Cat Road to Ten Mile Road Proposal #: CT225-02 Date: 23-Apr-25 Plan Date: NA Line# Item # Item Description Qty UM Unit Price Total Price Landscape/Patterned Concrete 1 Establish Subgrade w/Import Fill and 780 TON $ 43.89 4" of 3 4" Base Gravel $ 34,234.20 2 Landscaping Scope 1 LS $ 99,677.85 $ 99,677.85 3 Concrete Scope 1 LS $ 72,490.00 $ 72,490.00 4 Survey for Joint Layout 1 LS $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 5 GC Overhead and Profit 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Total Price $212,652.05 Page 1 of 1 4/23/2025 5:33 PM E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 25-2520: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy 4.5, Regarding Bereavement Leave; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2520 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO AMEND CITY OF MERIDIAN STANDARD OPERATING POLICY 4.5, REGARDING BEREAVEMENT LEAVE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the City Council has authority over the policies of the City of Meridian; and WHEREAS,the City Council finds it in the best interest of the City of Meridian to update the bereavement leave policy to ensure consistent and equitable application for all employees; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That the City of Meridian Standard Operating Policy no. 4.5, regarding Bereavement Leave, shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 2. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED: Robert E. Simison, Mayor ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION AMENDING STANDARD OPERATING POLICY No.4.5-BEREAVEMENT LEAvE PAGE I EXHIBIT A City of Meridian E 1�lAlr Standard Operating Policy Number 4.5 Bereavement Leave Purpose: To establish the City's policy providing paid Bereavement Leave for regular full-time employees. Policy: In the event of a death in the immediate family of an employee, the City allows regular full-time employees an absence from work with pay of up to forty(40) hours. Additional time off may be granted, utilizing the employee's accrued vacation time, consistent with the policies of the City. The employee shall notify his/her supervisor as soon as possible to schedule the use of this leave. This policy shall be implemented pursuant to the Bereavement Leave Standard Operating Procedures. Authority& Responsibility: Immediate supervisor and department director or designee shall be responsible for administration of this policy. Revision Date:5/2025 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2521: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian to Amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan Concerning 5.0 Acres of Land for the Expansion of the Black Cat Business Center, Generally Located at 299 S. Black Cat Road, in a Portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2521 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONCERNING 5.0 ACRES OF LAND FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE BLACK CAT BUSINESS CENTER, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 299 S. BLACK CAT ROAD, IN A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority pursuant to Idaho Code § 50-302 to establish resolutions not inconsistent with the laws of the state of Idaho as may be expedient, in addition to the special powers therein granted, to maintain the peace, good government and welfare of the corporation and its trade, commerce and industry; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan was adopted in December 2019 as resolution 19-2179; and WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed it appropriate to amend the Future Land Use Map of the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan concerning 5.0 acres of land for the expansion of the Black Cat Business Center, generally located at 299 S. Black Cat Road, in a portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, as depicted on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, all notices, hearings, and required information necessary to make a final decision as required by the Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act to amend the adopted City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6509, the City Council hereby amends the City of Meridian Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map as depicted on Exhibit A under "Proposed Future Land Uses." A copy of this Resolution and the attached amendment shall be held on file in the office of the City Clerk. Co PREBENsivE PLAN AMENDMENT-MAP—CORE&MAIN—x-2024-0066 Page 1 of 2 SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk COMPREIIENswE PLAN AMENDMENT-MAP—CORE&MAIN—x-2024-0066 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A Dote:3/11/2025 Adopted Future Land Uses -- - -. Legend a J • CPAM Change M�!tlTiM+. Future land Uses City ALle - Low Deritity Residben iul Medurr.Density Res•yenhal _ Mt+d-H001t DenOy Res+denhai -High(tensity Residential -Commercial -Otrice i -IndrsllrJ _ 1 _ Com Proposed Future land Uses _old lawn _Mixed Use Neighborhood -Mimed Use Conim rrty -Maed Use Regional FRANKtrN -Mw d Use Non-Resnienh0 Mood Usa-1licsrchongr. t Ten Mie Specific -Low Density Ernp4uynten1 -Lifestyle Censer L_ + -High Density EmLtloymeni Y, + + -Maed rmpinyment O � C -Maed Use Residential ••• `l►Ss.L�.Li1LtiU -Mixed Use Commercial E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2522: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Meridian Appointing Members of the Compensation Committee; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 25-2522 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN APPOINTING MEMBERS OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Meridian City Code 2-3-3 establishes Standing Committees and their provisions; and WHEREAS, Meridian City Code 2-3-5 establishes the Compensation Committee, its members and terms of their appointments; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems the appointment of these members to the respectively listed seats of the Compensation Committee to be in the best interest of the Compensation Committee and the City of Meridian; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY, IDAHO: Section 1. That pursuant to Meridian City Code § 2-3-5(B), the following persons are hereby appointed to the Compensation Committee: Seat 1: David Ballard, with a term to expire September 30, 2025. Seat 2: Steve Cory, with a term to expire September 30, 2025. Seat 3: Jo Greer, with a term to expire September 30, 2025. Seat 4: Brad Hoaglun, with a term to expire September 30, 2025. Seat 5: Jessica Perreault, with a term to expire September 30, 2025. Seat 6: Clint Shiflet, with a term to expire September 30, 2025. Section 2. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison Chris Johnson, City Clerk APPOINTMENT OF BALLARD,CORY,GREER,HOAGLUN,PERREAULT,SHIFLET-2025 MERIDIAN COMPENSATION COMMITTEE E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Community Center Design Update Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: E IDIAN Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader, Vice President D A H Q Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts June 3, 2025 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison and City Council FROM: Garrett White, Recreation Superintendent RE: Community Center Design Update Background Staff has been working with ZGA Architects on programming and schematic design of our new Community Center and park expansion, which produced an efficient layout with attractive components and ample parking.We have now transitioned into design development. During the design development phase we are putting a finer point on the layout, finishes and identifying areas for improvement, and incorporating ideas to save costs. This presentation is centered around the project design. Council Action No Council action at this time. We are requesting comments and feedback on the proposed design of the Community Center and Park expansion. Meridian Community Center Design Update June 17, 2025 Proposed Timeline Summer-Fall2024: r' "� •' • Schematic Design , • Parks&Recreation Commission Meeting in October • Council Check In October • Public Outreach in December to Finalize / • Programming • Continue to develop an Operational Cost Pro Forma Winter 2024-Spring 2025 RER AE j • Design Development/Schematic Design / • Parks&Recreation Commission Meeting in February/March • Council Check In-Spring or Summer T 2025 Bid/Obligate Funds • Council Check In-Present Construction Contract 2026 Construction 2027 Complete Construction J Community Center Open in FY28 Where are we in the process? ➢ Design Development—High level of details are being reviewed such as exterior finishes, interior finishes, ceiling heights, storage cabinets, lighting, security cameras, access control, flooring in each specific room, public art locations, and more. Access Control/Security/ IT I T ki. � III II III II I _-- — — —- - - I _ - -0 j i I I � --j , , _ Access Control Badge Reader _. Tj * _ S o may. o OSecurity Camera(xl Cat6a) } � Wall Data Drop(x2 Cat6a) WiFi Access Point(x2 Cat6a) �- _- - --Y_ —---- ,� c o °o n n P Qq�M.LL FLOOR PLAN �, Fiber Connection i ASP IIIIII C. I: m------------------- E cm ER _ OPEN PLAY SPACE J —EXISTinG COM.IERCWL s no 1 Ljavv�vvvvay .� ❑ MEMO 11 _—_—___—_ ___—_— ED 1� A101 Building Elevations �• �--•R-�°-•R ..y r. WEST ELEVATION �77 NORIN ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 7. 1 ..y SOUTH ELEVATION Site Plan SETME PAW Park Site Design Key Features --- \ • 347 parking spaces • OpLarge and Small Do Park g tip Communit Center Open Play Green SpaceBasketball Courts Unique Play Structure • Pathway expansion iQ l COMMUN"� _ OPEN PUY SPACE • • . ' �,...' - E%MNG MERCL i C t7 0 OM S ; VENABLE AVENUE TOUSMKRD.----> 1f111 M1TSRE PIAN �17.''iP",w iI _A101 i. Floor Plan i i q ' i ' R .o :00_o e a • Potential Public Art Locations • Working with Stephanie Inman and Cassandra Schiffler to explore possible public art locations and wayfinding in the Community Center and park expansion. • Public Artthemingwill celebrate agriculture, irrigation,and the history of settlers in Meridian. • Balance high impact artwork with cost effective elements. • Arts Commission and Staff prioritized art elements include; ➢ Welcome entry piece ➢ Lobby installation ➢ History Wall _ ➢ Hallway interchangeable displays ➢ Wall Dioramas r J L Questions? Feedback? E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Homecourt Fee Discussion Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: E IDIAN Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader, Vice President D A H Q Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts June 6, 2025 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Robert Simison and City Council FROM: Garrett White, Recreation Superintendent Jake Garro, Homecourt Facility Manager RE: Homecourt Fee Discussion Background The City purchased the Homecourt facility on September 301h of 2016. The current fees at Homecourt were established then and have not been increased. Over the past several months,we have reviewed the Homecourt cost recovery and the facility's overall subsidy. With the cost recovery percentage reducing over the past fewyears due to general cost increases,staff feel that it is necessary to increase fees. Staff is requesting the fee increase to be in two phases over the next two years. The fees proposed in phase one are anticipated to reduce the subsidy and increase the facility cost recovery from a projected 38%to approximately 55% based on 2024 volumes. In phase two,we hope to reach a cost recovery of approximately 65% based on 2024 volumes. In addition to increasing fees, staff are exploring other sources to increase revenues and lowering operational costs such as a sponsorship program,a vending or beverage contract in our recreation facilities, reducing operational hours during low volume times,and reducing the facility janitorial budget. Objective For Council to provide feedback and any comments on the proposed fees and other potential sources of revenues. �I Run MERIDIAN HOMECOURT Fee Proposal . FY24 Homecourt Day Passes& Memberships Sold Additional Homecourt Users; -Youth Club Volleyball FYUVotumes -Youth Club Basketball Day Passes ' -Community Education Classes Youth 11,114 Adult 22,220 *Kendo *Jazzercise Senior 6,o?? *Fencing *Line Dance Non Res 9,884 *Amazing Athletes *HoopsterTots *Baseball Tots *SoccerTots Youth 726 *Art Classes *Christmas Activities Adult 530 -Basketball Tournaments Senior 726 Non Res 1,438 -Volleyball Tournaments 3,420 Martial Arts Tournaments- ProposedCurrent Fees Phase :L Day Passes Current Fee w/tax Current Fee w/o tax Day Passes Proposed Fee W/O Tax **Fees have not been increased since the City purchased the Homecourt from the YMCA in 2o16. Fees were Youth $z $i.8g Youth E3.00 Ez.83 Adult $3 $z.83 Adult E400 E377 Senior $z $i.8g Senior E3.00 Ez.83 Non Res $4 $377 Non Res ES.00 Eq.7z Memberships-MTH Current Fee Current Fee w/o tax Memberships-MTH Proposed Fee W/O Tax Youth $i5.go $z5.00 Youth Ezi.00 E�g.8i Adult $zi.zo $zo.00 Adult Ez8.00 Ez6.yz Senior $i5.go $z5.00 Senior Ezi.00 Ei9.8i Non Res $z6.5o $z5.00 Non Res E35.00 E33.oz Court Rental Fee Court Rental Fee Cost Per Hour Per Court w/tax Cost Per Hour Per Court w/o tax Practice Court Fee Per Hour W/O Tax E45oo E4z44 E65.00 E6i.3z Tournament Court Fee Per Hour W/O Tax E75oo E7o75 based on ProposedCurrent Fees Phase 2 Day Passes Current Fee w/tax Current Fee w/o tax Day Passes Phase z Proposed Fee W/OTax Youth Sz $1.8g Youth $q.00 $3.77 Adult $3 Sz.83 Adult $5.00 $4.7z Senior $z $1.8g Senior $q.00 $3.77 Non Res S4 $3.77 Non Res $6.00 $5.66 Memberships-MTH Current Fee Current Fee w/o tax Memberships-MTH Phase z Proposed Fee W/O Tax Youth S15.go $15.0o Youth szs.00 sz6.gz Adult $21.20 $20.0o Adult 835.00 $33.oz Senior $15.go $i5.00 senior szs.00 sz5.yz Non Res $z6.5o $z5.00 Non Res saz.00 s39.6z Court Rental Fee Phase z Court Rental Fee Cost Per Hour Per Court w/tax Cost Per Hour Per Court w/o tax Practice Court Fee Per Hour W/O Tax $45 00 $4z 44 TBD TBD Tournament Court Fee Per Hour W/O Tax TBD TBD HomecourtCostRecove MINUSOne-TimeCosts Revenues or Projected Operational Revenues Costs Subsidy CostRecovery Year FYz3 $z73,360 8556,763 ($z83,4o3) 49% Actual FYz4 Sz78,007 86ig,7z4 ($341,717) 45% Actual FYzS Sz58,007 S67z,008 (8414,00i) 38% Projected FYz6(Phase i Feelncreases) 8349,418 S6i6,36i (Sz66,g4z) 57% Projected FYz7(Phase z Feelncreases) 5416,77g S6zg,68i (Sziz,goz) 66% Projected • FY21; Revenue Decrease -Loss of lease revenues when Church moved • Staff Recommendations to Lower Subsidy and Increase Revenues Day Passes/Memberships -Increase all day passes and memberships Hourly Court Rate -Increase the hourly court rental rate from$42.44 to$61.32($65 w/tax) -Increase the hourly court rental rate for Tournaments from$42.44 to$70.75($75 w/tax) Community Education Class Revenues -Move a portion of Community Education Class revenues that use Homecourt to Homecourt Revenues. Operational Cost Reductions -Reduce Janitorial from $127K to$75K saving $52K a year. -Reduce operational hours during low volume times. Additional Revenue Sources , -Sponsorship Program(Advertisements in the facility) -Beverage/Vending contract for Recreation Facilities Timinq -Recommendation/Feedback from Council ass *June 17tn 1 -Phase i Fees Posted *June i8th -Phase i Fees Public Hearing at Council *July 8th -Phase i Fees Imposed (Staff Recommendation) *Start date of September 1st of 2025 to allow staff to notify users of the fee increases. *HVAC Replacement and Floor Resurfacing projects projected to be completed by September 1st -Phase z Fees to Council July of 2o26 �, I MERIDI '* I HEIMECOURT FAM/LY RECREATION CENTER QUESTIONS OR FEEDBACK? E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements Concerning Countywide Development Impact Fees Discussion (� E N MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Work Session From: William L. M. Nary, City Attorney and Meeting Date: June 17, 2025 Kurt Starman, Deputy City Attorney Presenter: Kurt Starman, Deputy City Attorney Estimated Time: 15 minutes Topic: Consider Approving Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements with Ada County and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Concerning Countywide Development Impact Fees Recommended Council Action: Consider approving Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements ("Agreements") with Ada County ("County") and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District ("District") concerning the capital improvements plans ("CIPs") that are necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. Background: The County and District wish to adopt countywide development impact fees to partially fund coroner-,jail-, and EMS-related capital improvements associated with new development. The proposed fees,which total $750 per single-family housing unit,would be similar to the development impact fees collected by the Ada County Highway District. Unlike ACHD, however, the County and District cannot collect development impact fees within the incorporated cities without each city's participation. In order to proceed, every incorporated city must: (1) enter into intergovernmental agreements with the County and District; (2) adopt the CIPs; and (3) adopt an ordinance. Based on that, the City Council has discussed a four-step implementation plan, as follows: 1. Enter into Agreements with the County and District that only address the CIPs at this time. The Agreements do not require the City to adopt the CIPs, nor do they require the City to adopt countywide development impact fees. Rather, the City would simply agree to consider the CIPs. 2. If the Agreements are approved,the City would then consider the CIPs in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. The basic steps are as follows: a. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee would forward its written comments to the City in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. b. The Planning and Zoning Commission would conduct a public hearing concerning the CIPs and forward its recommendation to the City Council. c. The City Council would conduct a public hearing and make its determination. If adopted,the CIPs would be added to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City would not require an application fee to process the Comprehensive Plan amendment given the City's direct involvement. 3. If the City adopts the CIPs, it would then pause until all the other cities have adopted (a) the CIPs and (b) the ordinances necessary to collect countywide development impact fees. 4. If all the other cities timely adopt the CIPs and necessary ordinances,the City would then consider adopting an ordinance to collect countywide development impact fees.A successor intergovernmental agreement would also be necessary at that time.As noted above, however,the City would not be obligated to adopt countywide development impact fees. Approval of the Agreements would be consistent with "step one" of the implementation plan. The City Council has been receptive to working with the County and District on countywide development impact fees but has noted some reservations about a coroner-related fee, since coroner-related facilities are not explicitly delineated in Idaho Code section 67-8203(24)(0. If the City Council determines it does not wish to consider the CIP concerning coroner-related facilities, it is recommended that the City Council refrain from acting on the Agreements at this time so that staff can make modifications as needed. The Agreements could then be placed on a future consent agenda for final action. Agreements included on the agenda as potential action items: - Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements - Ada County Emergency Medical Services District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for District System Improvements Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 AGREEMENT NO. 30465 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A & 67-23281 Parties to Agreement: Ada County County Ada County Board of Commissioners 200 W. Front Street, Third Floor Boise, Idaho 83702 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 8, 2025 ("Effective Date")by and between Ada County ("County") and the City of Meridian("City")as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plans ("CIPs") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 1 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements. 1.4 Capital Improvements Plans and/or CIPs: Means and refers to, collectively, the May 24, 2024 Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study and the May 24, 2024 Coroner Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study, all of which were prepared for and adopted by the County. 1.5 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.6 City Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.7 County: Means and refers to Ada County, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.8 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the County and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.9 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.10 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIPs. The CIPs are intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development, protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers, privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the County and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. 2.4. The County is responsible for providing coroner-and jail-related services on a countywide basis. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 2.5. The County is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the County's ability to provide coroner- and jail-related services are affected by said development. 2.6 The County has provided the City with the CIPs,which were prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIPs in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3) and 67-8208(1). 2.8 The County has requested that the City adopt the CIPs in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however,that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIPs. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIPs and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The County shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee shall serve as an advisory committee to the Ada County Board of Commissioners and City Council and is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The County shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIPs with the City on or before June 30, 2025,to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIPs prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 SECTION 4 SERVICE AREA 4.1 Idaho Code § 67-8203(26) provides that the Parties can identify a geographic area by an intergovernmental agreement in which specific public facilities provide services to development within that geographic area on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles or both. 4.2 The CIPs and this Agreement define the Service Area as the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. SECTION 5 COSTS SPECIFIC TO COUNTY 5.1 The County shall pay the following costs: 5.1.1 All costs associated with the Advisory Committee; and 5.1.2 All County costs associated with drafting this Agreement and any amendment or termination of the same; and 5.1.3 All costs associated with the County's performance of this Agreement; and 5.1.4 All legal costs and fees associated with any action brought by a third party concerning the validity of the CIPs or this Agreement. SECTION 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 After the Advisory Committee files its written comments concerning the CIPs with the City in accordance with the Act and Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement,the City shall consider the adoption of the CIPs in accordance with the Act. 6.2 If the City adopts the CIPs, the City agrees to consider the possibility of adopting a City ordinance concerning the countywide development impact fees delineated in the CIPs, but only after (a) the Parties negotiate and agree on a new intergovernmental agreement for that purpose and (b) all the incorporated cities in Ada County have adopted (1) the CIPs and(2)the ordinances necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. 6.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that: 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt the CIPs; and ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 4 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 6.3.2 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt an ordinance implementing countywide development impact fees. SECTION 7 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 To the extent permitted by law, County shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for all claims, losses, actions, damages, judgements, costs, expenses arising out of or in connection with any acts or omissions of the County related to the CIPs or this Agreement. In the event of such claim, County shall defend such allegations,and County shall bear all costs, fees,and expenses of such defense, including,but not limited to,all attorney fees and expenses,court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses. SECTION 8 TERM/TERMINATION/AMENDMENT 8.1 Term. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2029, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 8.2 of this Agreement. 8.2 Party Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party upon ninety (90) day notice in writing to the other Party. 8.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the Parties. SECTION 9 NOTICE AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS 9.1 Notices. All notices,requests or demands to a party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given or served upon the other party by US Mail or email addressed as set forth below. 9.2 Contact Information. The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the County is as follows: Ada County Development Services Attn: Director 200 W. Front Street, Boise, ID 83702 dswebportalcontactus@adacounty.id.gov With Copy to: Ada County Prosecutor's Office Attn: Chief Civil Deputy 200 W. Front Street, Room 3191 Boise, Idaho 83702 adacountyprosecutor@adacounty.id.gov ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 5 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 9.3 The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the City is as follows: City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 cjohnson@meridiancity.org SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 Third Party Beneficiaries. Each Party to this Agreement intends that this Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person or legal entity other than the Parties hereto. 10.2 Electronic and Non-Electronic Signatures: The County and City may execute this Agreement using handwritten signatures or electronic signatures, in accordance with Idaho's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The Parties acknowledge and agree that both signature methods are equally valid and binding for the purposes of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. Should any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, parties, or circumstances, for any reason be declared illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal or invalid provision had not been contained herein. 10.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted by the laws of the state of Idaho. Venue shall be Ada County, Idaho. 10.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements,promises,or inducements made by either Party, or agents of either Party, whether oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both Parties. 10.6 Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence for all events and obligations to be performed under this Agreement. 10.7 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party brings any action or proceedings to enforce, protect or establish any right or remedy under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to any other relief awarded. 10.8 Assignment. No Party may assign this Agreement or any interest therein. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 6 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of Ada County Commissioners DocuSigned by: 4/8/2025 1 4:16 PM MDT By: �� Rod Beck, Commissioner DocuSigned by: 4/9/2025 1 2:14 PM MDT By: Ryan Davidson, Commissioner FDocuSigned by::V By: -0* 4/10/2025 1 12:21 PM MDT Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: Z gned by: 4/10/2025 1 2:38 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of Meridian By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-17-2025 ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-17-2025 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 7 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB AGREEMENT NO. 30708 ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A&67-2328] Parties to Agreement: Ada County Emergency Medical District Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Services District Attn:Director 370 N. Benjamin Ln. Boise, Idaho 83704 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E.Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 22, 2025 ("Effective Date") by and between the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District ("District") and the City of Meridian("City") as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plan ("CIP") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 1 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County Medical Services District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements. 1.4 Board: Means and refers to the Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District. 1.5 Capital Improvements Plan and/or CIP: Means and refers to the May 24, 2024 EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study,which was prepared for the District and adopted by the Ada County Board of Commissioners. 1.6 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.7 City Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.8 District: Means and refers to the Ada County Medical Services District,Party to this Agreement. 1.9 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the District and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.10 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.11 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIP. The CIP is intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development,protect the public health,safety,and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers,privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the District and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 2.4. The District is responsible for providing emergency medical services on a countywide basis. 2.5. The District is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the District's ability to provide emergency medical services is affected by said development. 2.6 The District has provided the City with the CIP, which was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIP in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3) and 67-8208(1). 2.8 The District has requested that the City adopt the CIP in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however, that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIP. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIP and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The District, in cooperation with Ada County, shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The District shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIP with the City on or before June 30, 2025, to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIP prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB SECTION 4 SERVICE AREA 4.1 Idaho Code § 67-8203(26) provides that the Parties can identify a geographic area by an intergovernmental agreement in which specific public facilities provide services to development within that geographic area on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles or both. 4.2 The CIP and this Agreement define the Service Area as the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. SECTION 5 COSTS SPECIFIC TO DISTRICT 5.1 The District shall pay the following costs: 5.1.1 All costs associated with the Advisory Committee; and 5.1.2 All District costs associated with drafting this Agreement and any amendment or termination of the same; and 5.1.3 All costs associated with the District's performance of this Agreement; and 5.1.4 All legal costs and fees associated with any action brought by a third party concerning the validity of the CIP or this Agreement. SECTION 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 After the Advisory Committee files its written comments concerning the CIP with the City in accordance with the Act and Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement,the City shall consider the adoption of the CIP in accordance with the Act. 6.2 If the City adopts the CIP, the City agrees to consider the possibility of adopting a City ordinance concerning the countywide development impact fees delineated in the CIP, but only after (a) the Parties negotiate and agree on a new intergovernmental agreement for that purpose and(b)all the incorporated cities in Ada County have adopted(1)the CIP and (2) the ordinances necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. 6.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that: 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt the CIP; and ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 4 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 6.3.2 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt an ordinance implementing countywide development impact fees. SECTION 7 INDEMNIFICATION 7.1 To the extent permitted by law, District shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless for all claims, losses, actions, damages, judgements, costs, and expenses arising out of or in connection with any acts or omissions of the District related to the C1P or this Agreement. In the event of such claim,District shall defend such allegations,and District shall bear all costs,fees,and expenses of such defense, including,but not limited to,all attorney fees and expenses,court costs, and expert witness fees and expenses. SECTION 8 TERM/TERNIINATION/AMENDMENT 8.1 Term. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2029, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 8.2 of this Agreement. 8.2 Party Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party upon ninety (90) day notice in writing to the other Party. 8.3 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of the Parties. SECTION 9 NOTICE AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS 9.1 Notices. All notices,requests or demands to a Party hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given or served upon the other Party by US Mail or email addressed as set forth below. 9.2 Contact Information. The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the District is as follows: Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Attn: Director 370 N. Benjamin Ln. Boise, Idaho 83704 With Copy to: Ada County Prosecutor's Office Attn: Chief Civil Deputy 200 W. Front Street, Room 3191 Boise, Idaho 83702 adacountyprosecutor@adacounty.id.gov ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 5 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 9.3 The contact information for purposes of notice to and/or the delivery of documents to the City is as follows: City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 SECTION 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS 10.1 Third Party Beneficiaries. Each Party to this Agreement intends that this Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person or legal entity other than the Parties hereto. 10.2 Electronic and Non-Electronic Signatures: The District and City may execute this Agreement using handwritten signatures or electronic signatures, in accordance with Idaho's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act. The Parties acknowledge and agree that both signature methods are equally valid and binding for the purposes of this Agreement. 10.3 Severability. Should any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, parties, or circumstances, for any reason be declared illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal or invalid provision had not been contained herein. 10.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted by the laws of the State of Idaho. Venue shall be Ada County, Idaho. 10.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements,promises,or inducements made by either Party, or agents of either Party, whether oral or written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both Parties. 10.6 Time of the Essence. Time shall be of the essence for all events and obligations to be performed under this Agreement. 10.7 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party brings any action or proceedings to enforce, protect or establish any right or remedy under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to any other relief awarded. 10.8 Assignment. No Party may assign this Agreement or any interest therein. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 6 Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District DocuSigned by: By. A�� 4/22/2025 1 3:25 PM MDT Rod Beck, Commissioner DocuSigned by: By: 4/23/2025 1 12:06 PM MDT Ryan Davidson, Commissioner DocuSigned by: ��w-- By: 4/22/2025 1 3:58 PM MDT Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: DocuSigned by: 4/23/2025 1 4:16 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of Meridian By: Mayor Robert E. Simison ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 7 E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 25-2086: An ordinance (330 N. Linder Rd. — H-2024-0048) annexing Lot 3 of Heppers Acre Subdivision (a recorded plat on file in Book 20 of Plats at Page 1298, records of Ada County, Idaho) and a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 0.983 acres of such real property from R1 (Estate Residential) to the I-L(Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037876 Boise,Idaho Pgs=4 vbailey 06/18/2025 08:12:35 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2086 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE (330 N. LINDER RD. — H-2024-0048) ANNEXING LOT 3 OF HEPPERS ACRE SUBDIVISION (A RECORDED PLAT ON FILE IN BOOK 20 OF PLATS AT PAGE 1298, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO) AND A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; REZONING 0.983 ACRES OF SUCH REAL PROPERTY FROM RI (ESTATE RESIDENTIAL) TO THE I-L (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO ALTER ALL APPLICABLE USE AND AREA MAPS AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS AND ALL OFFICIAL MAPS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY TREASURER,THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER,AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Meridian received a written request from property owner Rinker Properties LLC to annex and rezone the land described in the legal descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the maps attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("Subject Property"), which exhibits are incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS,the Subject Property is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-222 to annex the Subject Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby annexes the Subject Property. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby rezones 0.983 acres of such real property from RI (Estate Residential) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—330 LINDER ROAD ANNEXATION H-2024-0048 Page I SECTION 3. That City Staff is hereby directed to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and its exhibits with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publication, in accordance with law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 17' day of June, 2025. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this_17th day of June,2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public Commission Expiration:_3-28-2028 ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—330 LINDER ROAD ANNEXATION H-2024-0048 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. William L.M.Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2086 An ordinance (330 N. Linder Rd. — H-2024-0048) annexing Lot 3 of Heppers Acre Subdivision (a recorded plat on file in Book 20 of Plats at Page 1298,records of Ada County,Idaho) and a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described in Exhibit"A";rezoning 0.983 acres of such real property from RI (Estate Residential) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B.] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—330 LINDER ROAD ANNEXATION H-2024-0048 Page 3 ELSENGEBR,fTSON LAND SURVEYS, PLLC. 2251 S. Sumac Street, Boise, Idaho 83706 Telephone (208) 859-6032 mike@elsurveys.com 17 October 2024 ELS Project No. 240506 Land Description EXHIBIT A Lot 3 of Heppers Acre Subdivision (a recorded plat on file in Book 20 of Plats at Page 1298, records of Ada County, Idaho) and a portion of the SE %of Section 12, T. 3 N., R. 1 W., B.M., Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, described as follows: Commencing at a found brass cap monument marking the NW corner of said SW %of Section 12, thence southerly along the westerly line of said Section S 00°31'39"W a distance of 1483.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence leaving said line S 88°13'52" E a distance of 40.01 feet to a found steel pin monumenting the northwest corner of said Lot 3 on the easterly rights-of-way line of North Linder Road; Thence leaving said rights-of-way and continuing along the northerly line of said Lot 3 S 88°13'52" E a distance of 316.87 feet to a found steel pin monumenting the northeast corner of said Lot; Thence southerly along the east line of said Lot S 00038'53"W a distance of 120.00 feet to a found steel pin monumenting the southeast corner of said Lot; Thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot N 88°13'52"W a distance of 316.62 feet to the southwest corner of said lot on the easterly rights-of-way line of said North Linder Road; Thence leaving said lines N 88'13'52"W a distance of 40.01 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Section 12; Thence northerly along said westerly line of Section 12 N 00°31'39" E a distance of 120.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above-described tract of land contains 42,800 square feet more or less subject to all existing easements and rights-of- way. 879 of ok, rrafy ZVI- KAELSTrojects1202412405061MrninlLegals1240506 Desc for annexation 090924.doc EXHIBIT B " W. PINE STREET LOT 3 HEPPERS ACRE SUBDIVISION AND A PORTION OF -14 2CORNER MERIDIAN 4ADA COUN SECTION ITY, IDAHO, USA 1 W 1 4 2024 w E s N 1"=40' c ti o � CO __ __ S 88'1352" E __316.87' _ _ r1 zl S SB'135 2rEPL5 8793 —__—__—__�•__ 316.8T __--•__—_—�___—__ PLS 8793 V 40.0" � wIN10 10 � �IW10 0 10 o�x IN o IN mio;Lu j W 330 N. LINDER ROAD 13 I ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR NO. R3579000015 I 42,800 S.F. OR 0.983 AC. r7 u� o i 40.01' N 88'13'52' E�PLS 11463 316.62' N 88'1352" W 316.62' PLS 11463' oegg �� i 8793 0 L ENGEBRITSON LAND SURVEYS, PLLC. 1 12 CA 2251 S. SUMAC STREET a Al p BOISE, IDAHO 83706 + 9�L' lq PHONE 32OSEO CORNER OF ~ mike lsurve0.00m 14 1 13 �4 R, Fvj ytF F.\ELS\PROJECTS\2024\240506\DRAWINGS\ROS\240506ROS.dwg W. FRANKLIN ROAD z per. E IDIAN --- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 25-2087: An ordinance (Core & Main — H-2024-0066) annexing a parcel of land located in a portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 5.0 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L(Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-037877 Boise,Idaho Pgs=5 vbailey 06/18/2025 08:12:35 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2087 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE (CORE &MAIN—H-2024-0066)ANNEXING A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; REZONING 5.0 ACRES OF SUCH REAL PROPERTY FROM RUT (RURAL URBAN TRANSITION) TO THE I-L (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO ALTER ALL APPLICABLE USE AND AREA MAPS AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS AND ALL OFFICIAL MAPS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY TREASURER, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Meridian received a written request from property owner Core & Main LP to annex and rezone the land described in the legal descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit "A"and the maps attached hereto as Exhibit"B"("Subject Property"),which exhibits are incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS,the Subject Property is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-222 to annex the Subject Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby annexes the Subject Property. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby rezones 5.0 acres of such real property from RUT(Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district. SECTION 3. That City Staff is hereby directed to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—CORE&MAIN H-2024-0066 Page I SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and its exhibits with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publication, in accordance with law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 17th day of June, 2025. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 17' day of June, 2025. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 17th day of June,2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public Commission Expiration: 3-28-2028_ ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—CORE&MAIN H-2024-0066 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: William L:M.Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho,hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. f 6 William L. M. Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2087 An ordinance (Core & Main — H-2024-0066) annexing a parcel of land located in a portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described in Exhibit"A"; rezoning 5.0 acres of such real property from RUT(Rural Urban Transition)to the I-L(Light Industrial)zoning district;directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law;repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho. This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B.] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—CORE&MAIN H-2024-0066 Page 3 EXHIBIT A • I DA H O 9939 W Emerald St SURVEY Boise, ID 83704 GROUP Phone: (208) 846-8570 Fax: (208) 884-5399 Description for Annexation-City of Meridian November 26, 2024 The following Describes a Parcel of Land being a Portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast Corner of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; From which, the Southeast Corner of the Northeast 1/4 (East 1/4 Corner) of said Section 16 bears, South 00043'00" West, 2,657.20 feet; Thence along the Easterly line of said Section 16, South 00043'00"West, 1328.55 feet to the North 1/16 corner the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence leaving said Easterly line and along the Southerly line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, North 89023'18" West, 494.31 feet; Thence leaving said Southerly line, North 00040'00" East, 384.50 feet; Thence, North 77028'00" East, 419.92 feet; Thence, South 89°1 T00" East, 85.90 feet to the Easterly line of said Section 16; Thence along said Easterly line, South 00043'00" West, 479.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above Described Parcel of Land contains 5.00 acres, more or less. 51 Page I of I EXHIBIT W. Franklin Rd. S.9 S.10 S.16 S.15 S89'17'00"E cI 85.90' o N �� Za_00i 419' I I - Io N 1 p I pi I of M .` u? N N -q- I U�I m °ram° Annexation Area o/I o o a w 5.00 Acres m K) r7'cn O 0 O0 I N l 0 Om o ) o z 1 1 I .. 1 N 1/16 S.16 N89'23'18"W 494.31' Point of � Beginning co 00 Legend Found Brass Cap Monument Q Found Aluminum Cap Monument 1 1 6 S.15 � Dimension Point g5�p��EN3H0 sG� S..1 ——— ——— Annexation Boundary Line I/�2(o/Z� o —— — Section Line a � Right—of—Way Line o— — — — — Parcel Line of Record NFiVCF OF ` ���= Scale: 1"=100' Area of Dedicated Right—of—Way 0 25 50 100 200 P:\299 5. Black Cot Rd. 24-282\dwg\24_282 Annex—Exhibit.dwg 11/26/2024 12:52:59 PM I DAHO Exhibit Drawing for Jo 2 82 SURVEY o. 9939W EMER4LDST AnnexationAnneXatIO BOISE,IDAHO 83704 (208)846-8570 299 S. Black Cat Rd. sne i Na. GROUP, LLC A Portion of the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 16, Dwg. Date T.M., RAW., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 11/26/2024 s89°17'00"e 85.9 077o2$ ye 419 92 : �o 00 M O Ul d O O L!7 O V CC) O M O C ►J/26/2� 494.31 n89°23'18"w 1City of Meridian Annexatoin Description 11/26/2024 Scale: 1 inch= 65 feet File: Tract 1:5.0009 Acres(217839 Sq. Feet), Closure:n00.0000e 0.00 ft.(1/565399),Perimeter=1864 ft. 01 n89.2318w 494.31 02 n00.4000e 384.5 03 n77.2800e 419.92 04 s89.1700e 85.9 05 s00.4300w 479.84 E IDIAN�- )AH AGENDA ITEM Department Reports Meridian Community Center June 17, 2025 Design Update Proposed Timeline public art locations, and more.cameras, access control, flooring in each specific room, ceiling heights, storage cabinets, lighting, security reviewed such as exterior finishes, interior finishes, High level of details are being –Design Development Where are we in the process?Community Center Open in FY282027 Complete Construction2026 ConstructionPresent Construction Contract–Council Check In •2025 Bid/Obligate FundsSpring or Summer –Council Check In •February/MarchParks & Recreation Commission Meeting in •Design Development / Schematic Design•Spring 2025–Winter 2024 Continue to develop an Operational Cost Pro Forma•Programming Public Outreach in December to Finalize •Council Check In October•Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting in October•Schematic Design •: Fall 2024-Summer Access Control / Security / IT Fiber Connection Building Elevations Site Plan Pathway expansion•Unique Play Structure•Basketball Courts•Community Center•Open Play Green Space•Large and Small Dog Park•parking spaces347•Park Site Design Key Features Floor Plan •Wall DioramasHallway interchangeable displaysHistory WallLobby installationWelcome entry piece elements include;Arts Commission and Staff prioritized art •effective elements. Balance high impact artwork with cost •Meridian.irrigation, and the history of settlers in Public Art theming will celebrate agriculture, •Community Center and park expansion.public art locations and way finding in the Cassandra Schiffler to explore possible Working with Stephanie Inman and •Potential Public Art Locations Questions? Feedback? We will use Existing Staff Weekdays(3) Site Supervisors (FY2030+)•Future CFP PositionsEvenings and Weekends-Use Access Control •CoverageMove additional Recreation Staff to assist with Daytime •Time-Seasonal Classes & Camps Coordinator to Full o Recreation Coordinator to Facility Manager o 2 Promotions•: Operational Costs instructors on class fees. All covered by revenues.Contracted Instructors are based on a 70/30 split with -facilities like Homecourt. Electrical, Gas, and Janitorial are estimates based on other City -NOTES:$ (149,038)Projected Revenues$ 253,000 Total O & M$ 402,038 Contracted Instructors$ 168,000 Janitorial$ 60,000 Gas$ 8,500 Electrical$ 20,000 O & M$ 44,469 Staffing $ 101,069 1-Year Typical Operational Costs Irrigation Taxes•Intermountain Gas•Idaho Power–Electricity •Advertising/Promotiona l•Communications Expense•Furniture & Furnishings••Alarm Service/Sprinkler System•Equipment Maintenance & Repair••Recreation Sports Expenses•Medical Supplies•Clothing Expense•Safety Expense•Office Expense•Janitorial•Note: Settlers Park expansion will have similar O&M costs•dollars)$150,000 Annual Operational Costs (today’s -$110,000 •-22,000 sf +/•$6.00 per square foot-$5.00• •time costs)-Projected Operational Costs for Park Expansion = $157,524 ($55K one-FY27 •Park Expansion Operations•Community Center Proforma Built on phased approach on staffing. •Projected 63% Facility Cost Recovery•Projected Revenues at Community Center = $253,000 (Based on updated Pro Forma)–FY28 •Projected Operational Costs = $402,038 (Based on updated Pro Forma)-FY28 •Community Center Operations•Settlers Park Expansion Construction = $3,850,000 (Impact Fees)•Community Center Construction = $15,870,310 (Impact Fees) Cost Recovery Potential Revenue Sources Event Reservations (Weddings/Reunions/Private Gatherings)o Workout Gym Memberships o Conversations with City Council.Note: Two Potential Sources of Revenue have been eliminated based on Previous Facility Sponsorship Program (Facility Advertisements)Facility Vending ContractDrop In FeesCourt RentalsSummer Camp ProgramsAdult Sports30 split / $63K in FY24)-(70 o Community Education Classes