Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-06-03 Regular City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, June 03, 2025 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted as Amended (addition of Item 5) PROCLAMATIONS \[Action Item\] 1. Elder Abuse Awareness Month Proclamation 2. Owyhee High School Softball State Champions Day Proclamation PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics ACTION ITEMS 3. Public Hearing for Program Year 2025 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan Continued to July 8th Motion to continue to July 8th made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 4. Public Hearing (Continued from May 13, 2025) for Centrepointe Apartments (H- 2025-0009) by Mike Maffia, MGM Meridian 2, located at 3100 Centrepointe Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2025-0009 A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to modify the existing Development Agreement (H-2022-0035, Instrument # 2022-079000) for the existing 11.17 acres and create two (2) new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 5. \[Added to Agenda\] Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the Amount of $80, 020 for consulting services for new Department of Justice ADA Web Content Accessibility Rule 6. Employee Health Benefits Trust Update Continued ORDINANCES \[Action Item\] 7. Ordinance No. 25-2085: An ordinance (Summerlin West Subdivision – H-2024- 0023) annexing all of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the southwest quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit “A”; rezoning 63.965 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (17.274 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (46.691 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 7:35 PM Meridian City Council June 3, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6.01 p.m. Tuesday, June 3, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Tina Lomeli, Bill Nary, Dave Miles, Bill Parsons, Linda Ritter, Crystal Campbell, Shawn Harper, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock _X_Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X—Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call the meeting to order. For the record it is June 3rd, 2025, at 6.01 p.m. We will begin this evening's regular City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next item up is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you could all, please, rise and join us in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: Is Mr. Zachman present? ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Then we will move on to the adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: In an effort to give Council a quick minute to grab a bite of dinner, we did not complete Item 21, which was a budget amendment. So, I move that we are going to amend the agenda and add that after the conclusion of Item 4, our public hearings for the evening. And with that, Mr. Mayor, I move we approve the agenda as amended. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 2 of 32 Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the agenda as amended. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to as amended. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. PROCLAMATIONS [Action Item] 1. Elder Abuse Awareness Month Proclamation Simison: First item up we have two proclamations. The first one we are going to do is Elder Abuse Awareness Month and if we could have Trina join us from The Ada County Victim Service Center at the podium. So, Council, we will first read this proclamation on Elder Abuse and, then, turn it over to Trina for any words that she has that would like to say and make sure we get good pictures for you in that context. So, whereas ageism and social isolation are major causes of elder abuse in the United States and whereas after a lifetime of contribution to their families, their communities and our state, every Idahoan deserves to live out their -- his or her days in health and security, yet every year millions of older Americans are denied the opportunity due to abuse, neglect and exploitation and whereas preventing the abuse, neglect and exploitation of older adults through maintaining and improving social supports will allow everyone to continue to live independently as possible and contribute to the life and vibrancy of our communities. And whereas 2025 marks the 19th annual World Elder Abuse Awareness Day. Its recognition will promote a better understanding of abuse, neglect and exploitation of older adults. And whereas organizations like the Ada County Victim Service Center recognize the importance of taking action to raise awareness of abuse, neglect and exploitation of older adults. Therefore, I, Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim June 2025 as Elder Abuse Awareness Month in the City of Meridian and call upon the citizens, government agencies and public and private institutions in Meridian to recommit to our community to increasing awareness and understanding of elder abuse and the steps our system could take to protect our elders. Dated this 3rd day of June 2025. So, on behalf of the City of Meridian please accept this proclamation and I invite you to say a few words and, then, Shawn will get us a good picture. Allen: Thank you very much, Mayor. This is a very important day and month recognizing our elder and our vulnerable community. I would like everybody to know about the Ada County Victim Services Center. It's located down at 417 South 6th Street in Boise. We are open 24/7 and we have a variety of services for our elder community, as well as those who have been victims of sexual assault, child abuse, domestic violence, stalking and human trafficking. So, thank you very much. This is very meaningful. 2. Owyhee High School Softball State Champions Day Proclamation Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 3 of 32 Simison: Well, Council, I will just say if you haven't been down there to do a tour I encourage you get down there and tour the new facilities. Quite impressive. With that we will move on to our second proclamation of the evening. If I could have the Owyhee State Champion softball team join me at the podium, along with their coaches. You know, it's always great. We do tend to see some legacy returners these last couple years amongst many of our state champions, whether -- you know, from multiple schools. So, we are excited to be here this evening and we are going to read this proclamation and while we do have -- we have another proclamation that goes in the record which has everyone's names, but we are going to ask you to say it, so those that are watching on -- at home will know who you are. But after I read the proclamation, Coach, turn it over to you guys for any comments and, then, ask the players come up and say their name, position and year in school and if you are going to come back next year or not, so -- to be a state champion. That's what we want to hear. So, whereas being an Owyhee High School softball player is more than making pitching, fielding, hitting and achieving state titles, it is training to build leadership, character, confidence, teamwork and resilience, all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world and whereas the Storm was the team to beat all season with a 28 in one overall record and an 11-0 conference record, winning the southern Idaho title and advancing to the state championship tournament. Whereas top tier Owyhee Storm won their first three games of the state tournament by an average of 7.6 runs and whereas Owyhee rallied for a three to two win to cap off an unbeaten run through the state double elimination tournament and captured a second title in the past three years and whereas the leadership, training, discipline of their coaches helped all team members to focus their talents and passion to become a winning team with each player making valuable contributions to their victory. Therefore, 1, Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim June 3rd, 2025, as Owyhee High School Softball State Champions Day in the City of Meridian and call upon the community to join me in congratulating The Storm on their remarkable athletic achievement and for representing Meridian so proudly in the state tournament, dated this 3rd day of June 2025. On behalf of the City of Meridian congratulations, ladies and coaches, on your successful year and I will turn it over to your coaches for any comments. Carpenter: Nobody ever wants to speak. Well, first of all, thank you very much to the Council. I will say this. Softball is so much more than a game. We are excited about the season we have. We did dominate. I mean it was pretty emphatic beating Eagle and Meridian and everybody. But I digress. I do want you to know this. I think things like tonight are really cool that we can honor these young ladies for so much more than a game, because it's really not a game, it's teaching life on a piece of dirt and grass in the middle of Meridian, Idaho, and I think this is a special place. I think this is really cool that we do this as a community and it is about community. It's about our 11 seniors that will leave. We are super proud of them. But we are also proud of what Owyhee has done over the years in our first four years, but also what we are going to do and we are really going to try to set the standard for how we live our lives, not just play the game and, hopefully, that's a reflection in the outcome on a scoreboard, but the reality is life isn't played on a scoreboard, it's played in between the beginning and the end and it's what you do during that time that really matters and that's the expectation at Owyhee. I Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 4 of 32 think it's the expectation in our city and our community and we are thrilled to be here. So, thank you all very much. Brooks: My name is Grace Brooks. I am one of the pitchers and I'm also one of the graduating seniors. Mahaffey: My name is Maddie Mahaffey. I'm a first baseman and I'm a sophomore. Gaytan: Hi. My name is Elysa Gaytan. I played first base at Owhyee and I'm one of the graduating seniors. Malliarodakis: My name is Sobella Malliarodakis and I'm a senior and I play shortstop. Schab: My name is McKenna Schab. I'm a graduated senior and I'm a catcher-outfield. Addis: My name is Alana Addis and I'm a graduated senior and an outfielder. Bryant: My name is Alaina Bryant. I'm a graduated senior and I played corners and catcher. McNulty: My name is Maddilynn McNulty and I play middles. And I'm a graduated senior. Shoemaker: I'm Saylor Shoemaker. I'm a junior and I play outfield. Garrett: I'm Kenadi Garrett. I was a designated hitter and I was a freshman. Bock: I'm Hailey Bock. I was a pitcher and I was a freshman. File: My name is Charlotte File and I was a right and left fielder. I'm also a 10th grader. Fazzio: Everybody wants me to speak. I'm Cal Fazzio, the assistant coach and the program hitting instructor. This is not going to be our first year here, so we are going to be back and that's all I got to say. Simison: And for those that didn't know, The Storm were the winners of the Watertower Award, so their banner should be up -- hopefully by the end of the week. If not it will be early next week through the summer, so -- PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Simison: So, with that we will move on to the next item on our agenda -- wherever it went. Anyone signed up under future -- public forum? Lomeli: Mr. Mayor, no one has signed up. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 5 of 32 ACTION ITEMS 3. Public Hearing for Program Year 2025 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan Simison: Okay. Then we will move on to our Action Items and next item up is Item 3, which is public hearing for program year 2025 Community Development Block Grant action plan. We will open this public hearing with staff comments from Crystal. Campbell: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. If you will give me just one second to share. I apologize. Sorry for that wait. So, this is for our plan that runs from October of this year through September 2026 and this is our recommended projects for this upcoming year. So, a quick overview of the CDBG program. We do receive the federal funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development or HUD. We do provide a five year consolidated plan. During that plan we go out to the public and stakeholders to identify the goals for the upcoming five years and, then, each year we submit an action plan that says how we are going to meet those goals. We received a letter from HUD saying that this year we are anticipated to receive 523,218 dollars and that is for year four of our five year action plan. The goals that we have for this action plan -- or I'm sorry -- for this consolidated plan are public improvements, permanent housing, public services and program administration. This is a breakdown of the recommended projects based on the goals. So, right now it's looking like about 11 percent for admin, 15 percent for public services and, then, public improvements and housing are both right around 37 percent of the overall. Two of those goals are city led projects. The first one is program administration and this just supports planning, management and compliance with the program and we also have the second one, public improvements, and this one is based on the goals that -- or, I'm sorry, the needs that were identified in the five year plan. We conducted a CDBG walkability study and all of these funds go toward those projects. So, the specific amounts for each of these goals. Under program administration we are asking to set aside 57,000 dollars. There is a 20 percent of the overall grant that is allowed for admin, but we are not needing to use all of that for admin this year. We will be able to use the rest of it towards the other projects. So, this will be for general administration, planning for our upcoming consolidated plan and any fair housing activities, which is usually a fair housing campaign. For public improvements we are looking at our better walkways, which is an improvement to sidewalks and lighting in areas that were identified in that study. We are asking to put 193,867 dollars toward that. The primary project is one that we began funding in for the first phase this current year and it's Northwest 7th from West Carlton to Cherry Lane and the additional funding would go toward completing the additional phases. If we have any remaining funds, if it's under spent or reallocated or anything, it would go towards our alternative projects which are listed here. We have East Badley Avenue near Northeast 2 '/2 Street and East 3rd Street and, then, there is another one in the same area at East Washington and, then, there is a potential project for a pathway across the Jackson drain that would connect the Fairview Terraces Estates to the Chief Joseph Elementary School. We also have some partner projects. These ones are selected through a competitive application process and there is two separate Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 6 of 32 applications, so they are not competing for the same funding. The first one is permanent housing and this one supports long-term housing solutions and the other is public services, which is more immediate short-term needs. To be a viable project they must show that there is a connection to housing stability. They have to show how they are going to require the participants to be income eligible and for the CDBG program that's no more than 80 percent of the area median income -- income and for Meridian a four person household could make up to 85,600 dollars and still qualify for this program. So, these are like working families that are just not quite able to make ends meet and they also have to be a Meridian resident living within city limits. The two recommended projects here -- there is a 15 percent cap on public services, so this is the maximum amount that we would be able to -- the two projects that were selected by our scoring committee are Jesse Tree's emergency rental assistance program for 43,483 dollars. This one provides temporary rental assistance for people who are at risk of losing their housing and, then, the second one is for the Boys and Girls Club scholarship program for 35,000 dollars and this gives access to childcare with extended care and summer programs. For housing there is one program, the Neighbor Works Boise homeowner repair program for 193 dollars 868 and this is for weatherization, accessibility and emergency repair for owner occupied homes and it -- so, it can't be for any rentals or anything, it has to be owner occupied and this allows them to stay stably housed in housing that they can afford. So, we have a couple of next steps listed here. On July 8 1 will be back for a public hearing that -- where I can give you any updates for the outreach that I have received any feedback and the public comment period will also close. And, then, on July 22 1 will have completed the final report with any feedback that I have received and have that, along with the resolution, on the Consent Agenda for you to approve and, then, by the end of July, then, I plan to have it submitted to HUD. So, my ask for tonight is that we get some community feedback. We really want to hear that this is the direction that the community wants us to go. There is multiple ways that you can provide feedback. We are going to have a couple of virtual open houses where people can sign in and ask questions. I'm going to try and get some of the people who are recommended for funding to be there to be able to answer questions, too. The first one is scheduled for June 18th at 10.00 a.m. and the second is July 30 at 3.00 p.m. The links to those will be on our website. There is also an online survey so that people can -- if they are not comfortable just giving open ended feedback, then, they can just answer some specific questions on how useful they think these programs are. Then people can also provide some feedback at the public hearing on July 8 and I'm also trying to get some more in-person events scheduled, which will also be on the website. And if anybody wants to talk about any of it they can contact me Crystal Campbell. My e-mail address is ccampbell@meridiancity.org. My phone number is 208-489-0575 or you can look on our website at meridian city.org/cdbg and with that I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you, Crystal. Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 7 of 32 Strader: More of a curiosity, but just -- I have been wondering like are you anticipating changes in future years, you know, based on changes in federal funding? Have you received any communication from HUD regarding that? I'm just more curious what we could expect going forward. Campbell: So, we are mostly guaranteed funding for this upcoming year, but after that it -- it's really -- right now it's not looking so great. It was one of the items that were zeroed out on the skinny budget. So, we are waiting to see how -- how that goes. But I'm not sure if we are going to. So, anybody who wants to reach out to their legislators and advocate for the program are more than welcome to. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I more was thinking -- I mean along the lines of -- I think not for this conversation, but in the future I think it would be important to prepare the -- especially the providers that we work with at Jesse Tree and, you know, certainly with the child care as well, just to have that discussion at some point, so that they are not completely caught flat footed. I'm sure they are aware of these changes and certainly there is no doubt that the United States government at a federal level is looking at a pretty dicey fiscal situation. So, I just appreciate you kind of providing some context, because I think the last thing we want is for someone to get here next year and just be completely blindsided. So, that's why I asked that question. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Crystal, because of the engagement you are doing is the request, then, just to keep the public hearing open and, then, we will close it at the conclusion in July? Campbell: Yes. Cavener: Thank you. Appreciate your presentation. Simison: Crystal, just had one question. It is July -- excuse me -- July 30th for the other one, so it would be after the public hearing is closed is -- on your virtual -- your virtual open house, one June 18th and another says July -- is that supposed to be June? Campbell: Yes. You are correct. Thank you for catching that. Simison: Okay. Campbell: Should be June. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 8 of 32 Simison: Okay. So, June 30 at 3.00 p.m. for the other virtual open public house. Okay. Campbell: Thank you. Simison: Any other questions for staff at this time? Okay. This is a public hearing. Madam Clerk, did anyone sign up to provide testimony on this item? Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. No one has signed up. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present, either in the room or online, who would like to provide testimony on this item? Seeing no one coming forward or raising their hand online, Council, do I have a motion to continue this public hearing? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move that we continue this item to our July 1 st City Council meeting. Simison: July 8th. Cavener: July 8th. Thank you. Appreciate it. July 8th City Council. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to continue this item until July 8th and is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and this item is continued. Thank you, Crystal. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 4. Public Hearing (Continued from May 13, 2025) for Centrepointe Apartments (H-2025-0009) by Mike Maffia, MGM Meridian 2, located at 3100 Centrepointe Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to modify the existing Development Agreement (H-2022-0035, Instrument # 2022- 079000) for the existing 11.17 acres and create two (2) new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. Simison: Okay. Next item up is Item 4, which is public hearing that was continued from May 13, 2025, for Centrepointe Apartments, H-2025-0009. We will continue this public hearing with staff comments. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 9 of 32 Ritter: Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. So, we are here tonight because the applicant is proposing to move forward with the project approval that was received in 2022 under H-2022-0072. That was for Centrepointe Apartments. And the -- with the modification to the existing development agreement. This modification would create two new agreements, which will allow the property to be -- the property to be developed independently. So, this is a site plan for the approved Centrepointe Apartments. It had approximately 213 units and this is the commercial portion of that project that was approved through a CUP for the -- for a drive through there. So, on December 3, 2024, the Council approved findings for H-2024-0019 and that was for the modification of the development agreement and the conditional use permit to facilitate the construction of a 239 unit multi-family affordable apartments project. The proposal strictly pertained to the residential component of that approved development plan. The applicant also requested alternative compliance to the open space and parking lot, but in January of 2025 the applicant terminated the entitlements and withdrew their application for that project due to complications at the state level with project financing. So, then, we did an administrative time extension for the project before you. Prior to the expiration date of April 1st, 2025, the applicant submitted -- he submitted an application for an additional two years. So, doing this process for review of the previous one for the affordable housing ITD had required the applicant to dedicate 12 feet of right of way on Eagle Road to reconstruct the right turn lane to Seville -- to Seville Lane. So, they wanted it to extend it down to turn in here. The current DA that we have requires the applicant to place the street buffers, pathways, as well as a 20 foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries to develop with the residential parcel and what the applicant is asking now is to -- in order to separate these he wants to do all this with Parcel E for the residential portion and, then, for the Parcel F, which is the commercial portion, he wants to do the landscape buffer, the pathway along Eagle Road and the right of way dedication and the proposed improvements by ITD with the commercial portion. The applicant has no objection to these conditions. He has worked closely with ITD on these conditions. That was part of the continuance because the applicant was still in -- working with ITD to work these out, because before all of this was with the residential portion, but ITD has agreed to allow them to do the right of way dedication and the improvements along Eagle Road with the commercial portion, because they will be doing improvements along Eagle Road for that. So, he wanted to do two different DAs, one for the commercial portion and one for the residential, so these properties can develop independently and not be tied to the same DA and staff has worked with him to -- on the conditions of this DA that is in the staff report and in working with the applicant he has no objection to that, but he will tell you that himself. We have been working really hard to get this to where it works for the applicant and for the city. So, basically, that's the gist of this development modification -- the modification for this and so at this time, as you can see, nothing has been developed yet, but staff take any comments or questions that you may have on this application. It's pretty straightforward from what staff had to deal with. Simison: Thank you, Linda. Council, any questions for staff? Appreciate it. Would the applicant like to come forward and make any comments? Good evening. State your name and address for the record. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 10 of 32 Maffia: Mike Maffia. 3030 North CentrePointe Lane. I'm the owner of the property and applicant. Good evening, Mayor Simison. Council Members. I'm just here to answer any questions. Simison: Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I was just curious. You know, have you had any further meetings with the neighbors? Have you had any discussions? What kind of feedback have you heard about this kind of -- I guess return to the old version of -- of a project here. Maffia: I have -- I have not since Devco removed -- removed their application, because that was the 239 units -- an increase in units. But spent a lot of time on the original entitlements working with the neighbors, the landscape screening, items we talked through in 2021 1 believe and have stayed in contact and prepared notices for these various applications, for the CUP extension and for the -- also this MDA modification. So, we did have neighborhood meetings that I held for both, so -- yes. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. More to this point. I mean because certainly with the previous project the affordable housing development that was contemplated here, we had a lot of interest from neighbors and I saw that there weren't any comments, which is usually a good sign, but maybe just a reason to double check that this was noticed, but, you know, you went through the meeting that you were supposed to have, et cetera. Maffia: Yeah. It came up during some of the public neighborhood meetings and clarified that this was going back to the existing entitlement and that we are just separating the DA, one being a residential development, the other being commercial. There is a bank -- originally the plan was to develop a Starbucks on that drive through. They since passed on the site. This is many years ago in the history and there is now a regional bank interested, but they don't lease, they buy and require a separation of the DA to proceed. And that all was explained to the neighborhood, so -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Mayor, thank you. That -- that makes sense to me. And, then, I do want to I think compliment you for -- while I did not appreciate your last continuance, I do appreciate that you worked with ITD and have gotten on the same page with them. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 11 of 32 So, I assume at this point you are in complete agreement and you will follow all the conditions that they outlined in their letter. Maffia: Correct. It was a new requirement to construct a deceleration lane. So, there was a lot of time and energy spent understanding the specific dimensions. Budgeting. It's a pretty significant cost increase, but we were able to reduce the stacking and the -- the taper length to the frontage of the property. So, yeah. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just one more for me just to say I appreciate you doing that, because I think I would have had a hard time if you were not able to meet that requirement and I mean this -- from what I understand this is like one of, if not the busiest intersection on Eagle Road. So, is it really in the whole state? Yeah. Well, there you go. So, I mean there is -- there is an acute need here. I drive by this every day and the traffic is a disaster. Part of it's the whole network of private roads and stuff back in this neighborhood. I don't know how we are going to solve that one day, but that's not your problem to fix at this moment. So, I just wanted to say thanks for working with ITD. I realize the economic cost of building that is significant, but I do think it will help our community. Maffia: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I just want to echo what Council Member Strader just said. Appreciate you and certainly Linda working in collaboration. One that gets pretty persnickety about continuances, but when it results in a better project it's easy to be in agreement on, so appreciate you working with our staff, listening to their feedback and Linda working with the applicant. Really good partnership. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Mike, just a quick question and it's reasonable -- makes sense why you need to separate the -- the parcels for the different developments. Is there a sense of timing with the development of them? Are -- is one going to develop before the other? Can you speak to that? Are you planning to hopefully have them relatively under construction at the same time? I'm -- more of a curiosity how you intend to do that. Maffia: Yeah. Ideally they would. The regional tenant has been waiting for the CUP extension. That was phase one, which was granted, and, then, this MDA separation. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 12 of 32 You know, I can't speak for them, because it is a sale to them, but I have worked ad nauseam with them on easement agreements, cost sharing agreements, to accommodate that. So, my hope is that it does proceed. In the meantime I'm back here working with consultants today trying to move the project forward. You know, it's no secret, multi-family development has come to a screeching halt nationally, but I'm hoping to start this project next year -- early next year, so -- yeah. Simison: All right. Thank you very much. Madam Clerk, anyone signed up to provide testimony on this item? Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. No one has signed up. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present who would like to provide testimony or anybody online who would like to provide testimony? If you are online use the raise your hand function. We do have someone online who would like to provide testimony. Vrba: Hello, Mr. Mayor and Honorable Councilmen. This is Jeff Vrba. The address is 3005 North LeBlanc Way, Meridian, Idaho. 83646. And I just want to let you know the applicant did have a meeting with us earlier this year to discuss this and I personally am for the split of the two parcels, so at least one could get fully developed up front with new landscaping and items like that. So, just want to let you know that that's what was going on. Thank you. Simison: All right. Thank you. Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Not a question, but just a comment. Thank you very much for chiming in. We appreciate hearing from you, since we have heard from all the neighbors on all of the previous applications, it's just nice to know that a meeting occurred. You all have seen this. We do appreciate that follow up. Thank you. Vrba: No problem. Thank you. Simison: Is there anybody else who would like to provide testimony on this item? Will the applicant like to make any final comments? Or are we good? Applicant waives for final comments. Council, what's your direction? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I am happy to kick us off. I move that we close the public hearing on this item. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 13 of 32 Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I think there are a number of reasons that this project makes sense. I think, obviously, from the neighbors' perspective it appears there is a decent level of support as evidenced by the individual who testified, but also by the lack of public testimony, which we have seen a lot of opposition of previous projects. It feels like this is landing in a comfortable place in terms of the unit count and kind of going back to where we were at. I'm very appreciative of the construction of the lane required by ITD. I think that will hopefully help a lot. But, again, you know, we do have constraints in the neighborhood behind here that are just really challenging. I think this is a decent outcome to move this forward. So, after considering all staff, applicant and public testimony I move to approve file number H-2025-0009 as presented in the staff report for today's hearing date and I don't believe we need any modifications to that. Thank you. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Item H-2025-0009. Is there discussion on the motion? If not Clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Best of luck. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. DEPARTMENT/ COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 5. [Added to Agenda] Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the Amount of$80,020 for consulting services for new Department of Justice ADA Web Content Accessibility Rule Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to Department/Commission Reports and at least the way I thought I heard the motion we were going to go to the budget amendment first. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 14 of 32 Cavener: Yes. That's correct, Mr. Mayor. Simison: Okay. Then, with that we will invite Mr. Miles up for a fiscal year 2025 budget amendment in the amount of 80,020 dollars for consulting services and I will turn this over to Mr. Miles. Miles: Good evening, Mayor and Council. Nice to see you. Thanks for the flexibility to move me up. I appreciate it. I think I will start with -- this is a federal mandate, which never feels good. I think if you do take the intent into consideration I believe it's -- it's well intended. You know, if you look at transparency in government, state and local levels, this is really about ensuring that we continue to be transparent, allowing our customers, all of them across the board, to access our services. It doesn't feel good to have a federal mandate, but in that regard I think it's the right thing to do. So, I am here for a budget amendment in the amount of 80,020 dollars for consulting services to have consultants look at our websites, web content, mobile device content, as it relates to ADA standards that the Department of Justice just implemented, a new rule last April of 2024. For some background on that rule we have spent the last kind of summer, fall, winter looking at the rule, talking with experts, talking with other agencies, working really with our team and I do want to thank Emily and Ally in legal, Bri and Trevor in the communications team, the IT team, Dan and Dave and Mike, they have been great at looking at this rule and kind of implementing things over time. If you read through the memo we have implemented what's called a widget. It's a tool that basically works off of Al. It's looked at our website. It's a little blue dot with a person in at the top right. That's basically Al working in the background finding some of these errors and notice noticing and automatically making the improvements. It can't do everything, though, and we know that. So, that's -- as we progress through this effort we looked at that type of tool and what else do we need to do, knowing that we don't have an in-house ADA expert, there is sort of a suite of people that have some experience in some areas of it. That's where we landed on the fact that we do need consulting services to ensure that the city's in the right position come April of 2026, that we are in compliance with the rule. So, that's what we are here tonight is asking for that budget amendment to ensure that we can bring a consultant in. Just some of the things we want them to look at. Again mobile device apps, web content for review and recommendations on how to improve those, along with making some of those improvements. Lot of our files -- PDF files, Word documents, the widget tool can't examine, so we need somebody with the expertise to at least look at a suite of those to say in general the first ten percent we look at here is how many errors those find, so that we know the rest of those documents probably need to look -- be looked at as well. We also want somebody to be able to give us a diagnostic tool that says, hey, here is a -- here is a suite of your issues. Now you have got a list, go tackle those -- those items and, then, to provide some training opportunities for all the staff that are involved in websites, whether that's -- it gets into terms like alt text, so when you see a picture on a web page, somebody that can't see that picture sees the words, can read the words, can hear the words audibly behind the scenes. Color contrast, things of that nature, we learned that on our website when you were three clicks into the website, yellow on white doesn't do really well for people that are seeing impaired. So, those are the types of things we are asking of that consultant Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 15 of 32 service. So, maybe I will stop there. Let you guys ask any questions you have and happy to address them. Simison: Thank you. Council, questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor, just a -- Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: -- comment. Dave, again, I appreciate these memos. It helps to really outline things. I think the only question that I had had -- that probably Council may have had -- is, you know, why now versus going into budget season and you can kind of see it referenced in the memo, but in order for us to complete the work by the deadline staff felt that it was more appropriate to bring the budget amendment to you. I know we would all prefer to go through the budget amendment. I think staff would prefer to do that as well, but in light of the timeliness issue felt that this budget amendment was necessary. So, I appreciate the education on this. Simison: Any further questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: With that I move that we approve the budget amendment in the amount of 80,020 dollars for consulting services. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the budget amendment for 80,020 dollars. Is there a discussion? If not, Clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 6. Employee Health Benefits Trust Update Simison: With that we will move on to our next Department/Commission Report, which is the employee health benefits trust update continued and turn this over to Mr. Nary. Nary: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. Here we have an update again just to hopefully answer some of the questions that have come up in the last couple of Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 16 of 32 presentations. Hopefully answer a few more questions and some explanation as we prepare to bring a budget amendment forward over the next week or two based on the timing for finance. The -- I would also like to thank the folks that are in the room. We have some of our board members that are here present, some of our HR support staff that provide support to the -- to the trust, as well as our partners with Gallagher, as well as Blue Cross, both in the room and online. Tina, do you have the -- great. Thank you. I listed any -- a little bit of recap for any of the folks online or have been watching some of these. We have tried to bring over the last couple of presentations just kind of where we are as a trust, kind of where the state of it is currently, both financially as well as some of the programming and so I did list all the trustees on there for folks, so they would know who were part of this group from -- they are all employees. Kevin West is our outside counsel that represents the trust. Again trust is a separate entity. It's a partner with the city on this -- on this program, but they do have to operate and function somewhat independently as well. So, I want to follow up on some of the questions that have been asked and hopefully we can answer some of those for everyone. One of the questions that was brought up was about GLP drugs and whether or not those have been driving some costs for the program and for those that don't know what that is, they are -- comments that you hear about publicly are things like Ozempic and Manjaro and a few others and the answer to that is generally no, they are not driving up the large -- they are not the largest part of the cost. They are not driving up the large claims. I looked on our list of the top 30 drugs that we are prescribed of members in our plan only four are GLP drugs and approximately less than ten percent of those drugs are related to the costs of the prescription claims. So, from a cost standpoint they are not significant in relation to some of the other things that are out there in the marketplace, but that was a question that was asked we probably should answer it. When was the last time the plan was marketed? Or did pulse check? We discussed pulse checks the last time and kind of the difference between a pulse check and RFP and one of the questions about that was when did we do it last. So, as you see here basically 2017 for plan year 2018. We were marketing some done by Mercer. Mercer was our -- was our marketing and HR consultant at the time. We are no longer with them. Gallagher is our consultants now. In 2020, in anticipation for us moving into the -- as we were moving into the trust we did do that then. We did that in conjunction with the benefits committee. We decided not to market with that transition at that particular point. We had already done that in front of that. So, we entered into a three year rate guarantee. So, we have been in a rate guarantee with Blue Cross for two cycles now, 2021 through '23 and now '24 through '26. So, this current term we are in expires at the end of December of 2026. We are -- we do have provisions in the contract that we could pull out of that if we needed to, but unless there was a compelling reason to there is a financial penalty to doing that. So, we have done that to try to maintain some consistency, both in the services as well as the cost, because that does help keep our costs down and does give us a rate lock for the services that we are receiving from Blue Cross for administration on this. So, that was a -- hopefully answers that question. There was no increase last year and now a potential 17 percent increase this year and I don't think it's been very clear and I apologize, because I think I'm the person that has not made it clear enough to folks. The 17 percent that we are talking about is the cost for the program. Not the administration of the program, but the costs that are incurred Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 17 of 32 by the members and the members are our employees or their dependents and those are for the medical services they receive. That's for hospital visits, doctor visits, prescriptions, surgeries, whatever they may be receiving. That's where the potential costs and expense has really grown significantly. So, it's not the administration that's being done by our service provider, but by the actual cost of the services that are received out there and the 17 percent as we put it in the slide is trying to keep the trust and trying to anticipate what those costs are going to be. And as I put in here, again, we had looked at a potential increase of four percent a year ago that was suggested by our consultant Gallagher, as well as our actuarial, but because we were trying to right size the trust and keep within a budgetary that was reason -- reasonable, the determination was with the -- surplus that we had at the time, we thought we could absorb that type of increase. Well, as you can see the increase has been significantly more than that. There has been a higher cost for those services than that four percent and that's where the gap is. So, now our estimates are running higher. So, based on those needs, based on those trends, that we are seeing, our actuarials and Gallagher are suggesting -- we don't have final numbers, but suggesting that we need to be anticipating potentially higher costs of those medical needs going forward. So, again, those are anticipating what the medical costs are going to be. That has nothing to do with the services for our administration through our provider with Blue Cross. So, direction was also asked about looking -- using the trust -- or can the trust use the city's procurement process, whether it be for a pulse check or whether it be through a RFP and our trust attorney is advised not to do that, that there should be some separation between how the trust functions and the city. He also felt that the trust -- that the city procurement -- again an RFP, which when you are looking for a -- when you are looking for actually a program like when we did the initial RFP for going out to a trust, is a more functional reason to do that. The rationale in the industry in using the other method, which is what they term a pulse check, is, again, you are looking at the service provider, because when you get a service provider you are paying service fees for administration and for stop loss, but you are also getting all those accesses that go with that. So, when you use that service provider that also gives you those accesses to the networks. That's really how most of those are all driven is predominantly on what network they have access to and what discounts that may be available through those networks, what services are provided through those networks. So, here our trust attorney is recommending we don't do that. We use Gallagher because that's the functions they perform. They are an industry expert. That would be the more likely or logical way to do it in his opinion. I asked Mr. Watts, our procurement manager, the same question and he also came to the same conclusion that it -- from a best practice standpoint in his opinion it made more sense to use a service like Gallagher. Again they are the industry experts. They know the programs that we have. They know the needs that our -- our particular work group has. They know the types of programs that are really more functional and usable for our employees and so they would be more able to help us evaluate the services that are available in the marketplace to match up with our needs. So, their recommendation would also be -- or his recommendation also would be to use them rather than through the procurement process. Again, the recommendation from the trust remain with Blue Cross currently for the duration of our contract. Gallagher would then market the services next year. So, the anticipation of 2027. We would go Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 18 of 32 and do a pulse check and to see what the services in the industry would be, what those would be to match up with the needs of our -- our customer base, our employees and make sure that we can maintain the level of services that they have been accustomed to, that meet the needs of their particular dependents and employees, so that we can continue to maintain a seamless service as we move forward into '27. The trust would then after we do that process would then come back again next year during the budget process to show the Council what we have done, what conclusion we reach, what evaluation we have done and what we recommend going forward for the next few years and likely -- well, hopefully, again, I don't know if the market changes slightly, but we would like to enter it in similar contracts where they have some price guarantees and some -- some -- at least some clarity and, then, for budgeting purpose for the future on the administrative side that we can maintain a fairly consistent rate of increase for those costs and keep them within kind of a reasonable market. You know, again, the other side, the medical piece is the one that's the hardest to predict and this is a table I had sent out to all the Council members and really it's just a -- kind of a benchmark that is used that was provided by our consultant as to kind of how you look at these two different types of methods and how you would look at from here where you are -- now you have a self-funded program, you already have that established, you have a program that's established and now you are going to be looking at this type of services that you are providing to your employees and their dependents and evaluating the services you are receiving for administering those, as well as the cost for those and what access and availability of that network can be for those different services and how that would, then, relate to the cost of the program. So, again, their recommendation is that in the industry the norm is to use that pulse check and evaluate the service providers, that way -- and not just do an RFP like you would do in a fully funded plan and that's the difference between them. With a self-funded plan like we have that's more of the standard. If you are doing a fully funded as we did in the past before we moved to this, that's what you did. That's -- you marketed the entire plan, because you aren't administering any of it. Here many -- most of the management of the programs, what we allow, what we don't allow, what's -- what's covered or when it's not covered is managed by the trust, not by the provider and that's the difference. There is also a higher cost normally with that as well. These are some of the costs in the past, just to give you kind of a snapshot. The one I wanted to draw your attention to primarily are the costs that you are seeing on the net cost for the coverage, as well as the net claims. I mean you get the significant in claims that you are seeing in 2024. The claims were eight million dollars and with fees 9.2 million dollars. I mean that's where the jump has been is in those net claims. That's where the big numbers are coming from and that's what they are looking at and trying to give us some estimate on the future costs on what it could be and what we are trying to anticipate in front of that. So, just a little -- a little table on what we have talked about, 2018, '19, fully insured. We had lesser employees than we do today. A larger amount paid in net costs and administrative fees. They were higher. That debt cost includes fees for administration, as well as stop loss and there is some premiums for that. Self-funded again less the net costs. So, you see the costs have come down in 2020 and gone down. The costs have come down some for those, because, again, some of the fees or administration is done differently under that. So again -- but there were more claims because of COVID and we had a lot of claims and Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 19 of 32 things that were being paid for that we -- were new, we had not anticipated. A lot of -- a lot of employers in that particular time period had costs, as well as Blue Cross did as well for things that, again, were new and unknown and things that we just had not anticipated at all. Again rebounding from COVID in '22 you see surplus in the trust in '23. That helped offset the proposed four percent increase. 2024 a larger spike in claims, far greater than the four percent. 2025 large claims again are driving the cost have impacted the surplus and reserves. That's where we are anticipating a budget amendment that we should be bringing forward here in the next couple of weeks to help make up that gap and to maintain what Department of Insurance is requiring that we keep as a reserve to maintain the trust and maintain that going forward. Carrier rates, again, proposed rates for medical and prescription claims are based on experience. They don't set the rates for those the carries through however sets administrative fees, which are shown here as net costs, which, again, includes the stop loss. I could talk a little about that in a sec and there was no increase to member cost share for their current plan, though claims costs that have been continued to increase. This is -- this is an issue that people need to keep in the forefront and I think we have talked about this a couple times. All of our employees do not pay any cost themselves for their coverage. That has not changed. That has been that way since I have been here. That's always been the same. So, you think you have a plan that's costing more money and there is no contribution from the employees for that, so that's going to have a higher cost. That's not going to -- that's -- that's a -- that's a decision -- a business decision the city has made and we have continued to make. Doesn't mean it can't ever change, but that's -- that's a business choice we have made. Also we have a contribution towards dependence and we changed that. It was 20 percent for a number of years. We -- it moved up to 25 percent for employees back during the recession in about '9 or '10 it moved up to 25 percent. We moved back to 20 percent in about 2017 or '18 and it's remained -- it's maintained that. Again, the plan has cost more. The costs have gone more. The contribution on the employee side has maintained the same. So, again, there is going to be a higher cost of those things. Again specifically the claims costs have gone up 30 percent and trend up and, again, the claims account for about 90 percent of the total cost of the self-funded plan. So, again, the cost of it has gone up significantly. In utilization year over year you can see there was a two million dollar increase in claims. Overall claims in '23 were 7.3 million. In '19 -- in 2024 9.3 million. Top drivers in those were cancer, gastrointestinal disorder, muscular -- muscular -- musculoskeletal disorder. In 2023 there were five members with more than a hundred thousand in claims. In '24 11. So, we have employees that -- employees or dependents that have increased in cost. Lots of reasons for that. Again one of our biggest drivers that we do tend to focus on is early detection. We want people to go out and find these issues early. They are more treatable early. They are less -- generally less expensive early. But they also are a longer time period of treating them as well. So, you are going to have those things. But, again, it's related to the plan and the cost for coverage. Stop loss again is the second -- is part of the administrative cost. We have evaluated our stop loss at 225,000 dollars we have had that evaluated -- two years ago? Yeah. Two years ago we had that evaluated to see if that was the right amount. Basically for those online that means the plan pays all of the costs for an individual up to that stop loss and after that we have reinsurance above that, so it's covered beyond that. That number is Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 20 of 32 one that we have evaluated a number of times. Do we make it lower? Do we make it higher? You know, lower it obviously -- there is a potential that you will pay higher fees and we have tried to evaluate and find that sweet spot and worked with our consultants with Gallagher to figure out where the majority of the claims land and I am not an actuarial and I am not an expert, we certainly have experts in the room if you want more specifics on that, but, ultimately, the decision was made is that seemed like the sweet spot for our program, that the number of claims below 225,000 dollars was of a right size, for lack of a better way of saying it, to make it practical and fundable to keep it at that number. To raise it higher you could certainly have lesser costs for reinsurance above that number, but that means you are going to pay again for every injury or every claim up to whatever the higher number is. So, we try to find that spot and that -- and that's probably -- probably one of the key components as we continue to evaluate how the trust functions or whether the number should move. So, I'm not going to say it's going to be 225,000 forever, but it could certainly go down or up depending on the marketplace and depending on the usage. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I'm curious about how our contract works. Is it itemized in a way that makes it easy to understand how much the reinsurance component is specifically -- and that's okay if that's a follow up. Nary: Sure. Yes, I believe so. But I could not quote that to you off the top of my head. Strader: I mean no different than like I'm totally peeved that my homeowner's insurance is going up and so have commenced discussions with my homeowner insurance provider why is this justified? Should we look at increasing our deductible. I feel like this is a similar exercise. You know, I would be curious -- I would just be curious to have more information about the contract and I think if -- try to put this in a diplomatic way. I think if the information about the contract itself was explained in our last meeting I think we would have had a little bit of a better discussion just because I didn't realize -- I think others did not realize that we actually had a fixed contract that would have a cost associated with it if we were to change directions; right? I don't actually think that a market pulse check is a real thing. I think it's something that we are doing. It's probably a great practice that we should do, but I fully support a market pulse checking regularly, I think that's awesome. But I really view this as more of a just -- this is a pretty straightforward conversation. It's like should we be going out to an RFP right now? Clearly the answer is no. If -- if our contract, you know, kind of keeps us from doing so it doesn't make economic sense. There are disruptions to our employees which you covered in the last meeting. So, I think it's good that we are kind of clearing this up, just so we have a lot of clarity just understanding what contract we have. I personally would like to actually see the contract and just have more information about, you know, the different components I guess of the service were being provided and I think the reinsurance question is a legitimate question to ask the next time we, you know, look at Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 21 of 32 -- look at this, which sounds like would be closer to heading to 2027. Okay. So, I guess that's my feedback so far. Simison: Well, Bill, and you did point over your shoulder at Eli when you mentioned the word expert, so he can come up at any point in time and -- Nary: Thinking more of Scott, but Eli is always welcome to come up if he wants, but we can certainly keep going, unless you have a specific question you want to ask the consultants or Christena. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Quick question I was wondering, since we are kind of on the topic of 225,000. I'm assuming we don't have lifetime limits on claims. We just have a yearly max; correct? Nary: Yes. Taylor: Have you looked at what that would -- you know, if we were to have a lifetime max and, then, some reinsurance anything above and beyond that? Is that something that you guys have looked at? Nary: If I recall I don't believe you can have a lifetime max -- Taylor: Okay. Nary: -- anymore. But I don't recall. Yeah. I believe that's -- that's not allowed any longer. There used to be -- like, for example, in the past you would have plans that had like a million dollar max. That's no longer allowed, so there isn't that. Again -- so, go back on our earlier session, so 17 percent renewal was the highest projected. That's kind of the range we were given as a potential to look at from a market -- or from a budgeting standpoint. So, that's why we want to at least forecast out to the highest that potentially could be. We are still waiting on some final renewals for recommendations, so we haven't got that finalized as yet. Again to summarize the administrative fees and stop loss, don't drive the increase in costs, it's the two million dollar increase in claims. That's really where the numbers have really increased significantly. The renewal increase is three percent. That's how much our administrative fees are. They are approximately ten percent of the total cost of the plan is how much we are paying in fees. That's just, again, the stop loss and the administration fees for the third -- it's called third-party administration. I broke out a couple of bullets on kind of explaining those more granularly, just on how much they are per person, how they are -- how they are calculated and what we are paying for and how much that is. Again, if we want to go into more detail you can or if you want to ask folks that are smarter than me on this subject they are here and hopefully can answer that for you. So, that's what we are Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 22 of 32 looking at. I mean, again, the cost -- and I know the concerns that have been raised about the cost are really driven by the market that's out there and, again, we have -- we do get discounts, we do have programs. I had a person in the last week said, you know, they had -- again we have pushed these programs off into folks, but as I was stating to you last -- last time people tend to not think of these things until they need it and sometimes because they don't think of it in the moment when they get scheduled for something or they have a recommendation or referral to do something and all we try to do from the trust standpoint is remind folks there is other options you may want to look at and I will tell you from a member -- as a board member and as our board has said many times I never want people to not go get -- go to the doctor, go get treatment, take care of themselves. That's absolutely important. But if there is options and opportunities for them -- and, again, recently a person spoke to me about it and said I had -- I had forgot about the smart shopper program. I forgot that existed and they had to go in for a procedure and they said because we had talked about it again it was at the forefront of her mind, she knew she had to enter this procedure, she got it booked, she called smart shopper, what can I do? They said we can get this booked from this one provider in one location to another one across the street. They go in and pay for it, you know, run your card whatever and in two weeks we will send you a rebate check. You will get your money back for going to do that. It will be discount -- essentially discounted to you for doing it and she's like that sounds like a win. It took five minutes. Five minutes on the phone. It was done. It was easy. But we happened to have talked about it a lot and so she knew about it and she used it. I asked her -- our provider -- I asked Gallagher and Blue Cross recently can we do more? What are we missing as a -- as a trust? What can we do better? And, frankly, they said I don't know what more you can do better than what you are not -- what you are already doing and we discussed it a lot, how do we remind folks what's there? The opportunities that exist, the ways to make programs cheaper, the way they could use it sooner, because one of the things that I think happens a lot when we have a flexible spending account like we have for employees today, if you go to the doctor in January and they tell you you are going to need whatever and it costs a hundred dollars, you will think I will just -- here is my card, run the hundred dollars and I'm good. But, then, in November if you needed that if you used up your flex spending you might remember, hey, we got the smart shopper thing. I better -- maybe I will go look at that and save me some money. Well, you could have done the same thing in January, but sometimes you don't think about it, because you just think I will just run the card and I won't worry about it. Well, you think about it and you try to make people smarter consumers. They may use it sooner. They may use it more often. It may become second nature. And, again, we are hopeful as we try to keep reiterating this with our employees, they also tell their coworkers who, then, also tell their spouses, because that's really where the access we are trying to keep pushing towards is getting your dependents to use that, too, to use that opportunity. It will save money. It saves them money and saves the plan money. But we keep pushing it, we keep trying to do it, and for the size of a program, for the types of issues that we have -- employees have it just costs money. It just does. So I don't have -- I wish I had a greater answer and I will say the same thing I said to folks. If there was a magic bullet we would all use it. If there was a fix that was easy we would just do it and, unfortunately, there isn't. But, hopefully, that puts the rest -- some of your Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 23 of 32 concerns or some of the questions you have -- we certainly can provide you the contract. That's not an issue. Again, we will re-evaluate as we do next year as we go forward and, you know, again, our objective always is -- from the trust standpoint is to provide a good program at a practical cost for the employees, as well as for the citizens of our community to provide this service and make sure that we remain competitive. I mean this is -- and I think the Mayor has said this to our employee groups, when people come to work here that is one of the number one things they ask about. What kind of benefits do we have? What's it going to cost me? How do I cover my family and for retain -- for recruiting people and retaining people it is critical and that's again a factor we evaluate to -- to make sure we can meet those needs for the city and the employees. Simison: Bill, maybe a question that you can confirm, deny or otherwise. Nary: Okay. Simison: Part of our -- is part of our administrative costs that we pay basically getting access to the negotiated contracts of that company for the services we receive? Nary: Yes. Simison: And so -- I think that that's kind of one of the value benefits that are out there, that will be -- how do you articulate the value of those negotiated contracts? And I think it's going to be the biggest question if you were looking for value on what claims we are paying and I think that's the potential savings in the future or -- or not savings. We could have the best savings based upon our current usage or there could be someone better, but there is also, obviously, the case of, you know, that's just if we understand in the same arena. There is also the -- if we want to look at controlling costs other ways as we kind of talked about, plan design changes, et cetera. I think those are questions for Council moving forward is if you have a dollar expectation that you say how much should the trust live within, they are going to do the work based upon that information that is provided if we need to get into that conversation moving forward, but that wasn't for today. I just at least want to ask -- just get clarification on that very first part. That's part of what we are buying with the administrative is all the work they do to negotiate on behalf of their clients for the fees that are paid. Nary: Yes. Simison: Okay. Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Bill, thank you. I think this is the either a third or fourth presentation, the most robust that addressed questions that I had and questions I didn't know I had until you presented the information. So, thank you for that. I did want to give you a chance, though, to at least respond to -- there were some additional questions I had sent -- the e-mail in response to the e-mail that you had sent Council Member Strader and I think specifically talking about why it took a significant amount of time for Council to be Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 24 of 32 informed that we had a price lock to begin with. I think that could have addressed a lot more of the questions that we had early on if someone would have informed us of that. It just -- it's been a head scratcher for me as to why no one will tell me why nobody informed us of this and I'm hoping you can give me some context. Nary: Sure. I can give you -- I can give you some context from my perspective. I don't know if it will answer your question. From my perspective our intent to come here was to prepare the Council to understand where the program is, because we are going to ask for a budget amendment. That was the only intent from the outset. We weren't here to talk about remarketing. We weren't talking about RFPs. We aren't here about any of that in my mind. We were talking about where are we? There was an increased cost to the program and that increased cost was going to lead to a need for a budget amendment, because we were -- we had a deficit in our -- in our reserve and that was the only focus of my intent the first time we came. That's what we are here to talk about. When that was brought up on -- what if we did this, when we went back and looked -- I think Christena actually came up and said I will have to go look at that. It wasn't in the forefront of her mind. So, I'm not -- it wasn't intent to do anything other than -- that really wasn't what we were thinking about or talking about and when we went back to evaluate, well, could we do that, because that's now being asked, well, the question was, well, yes, but there is a cost and there is price and so it just wasn't on our forefront, councilman, that's just all it was, that we were here really to just prepare -- to explain kind of where we are, to explain why we, then, need a budget amendment. So, that was the only reason. Cavener: I appreciate your response. Bill, you -- Mr. Mayor, a couple more questions. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Bill, you said we have got somebody from -- from Gallagher? Nary: Uh-huh. Cavener: I do have a couple of questions for them -- Nary: Sure. Cavener: -- if they are online or here in person. Nary: Oh. Scott's here in the audience. Cavener: All right. it's Scott? Howell: Yeah. Scott Howell. Cavener: Scott, thank you for being here. I appreciate it and I think that Council Member Strader -- your subject matter expertise is very very helpful. So, my questions Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 25 of 32 are about really government based self-funded plans and -- or self-funded trust. Excuse me. And like Council Member Strader, the term pulse check was something I had never heard of before. I have to be honest when I talked to our -- our purchasing agent Keith Watts a couple of days after that and he is like the best purchaser in the state, he had never heard of that term as well. So, it has been also a head scratcher for me and when I hear the feedback from our legal attorney and, then, I think from feedback of the trust legal attorney, I'm going to make an assumption, then, that zero of the government funded trusts that you represent either follow government based procurement procedures or go out for RFP. Can you answer that? Is my assumption correct or incorrect? Howell: Sorry, that they -- they either follow -- Cavener: Zero -- zero government funded trusts -- Howell Uh-huh. Cavener: -- follow their city procurement process and refrain from going out for RFP. They go out for the market pulse check and if that is -- if my assumption is incorrect, then, I would like to know what percentage follow municipal or government based procurement processes, because we just heard from the attorney representing the trust that we should not do that and I need to understand why and, again, we are told that this market pulse check, which something is very foreign to me, is the best practice. I would assume that a hundred percent of them would be using the market pulse check. Howell: Yeah. So, a hundred percent of our -- of our government self-insured trusts do their own procurement. They do not use the municipality's procurement department to do their procurement. The market check or pulse check -- really it's just -- and I think I saw this in one of your notes. It's really just a less formal RFP, less questions, less of a scoring rubric, relies more on our working relationship with the limited number of partners that exist in our market and it's -- it's more financially driven; right? What -- what are your discounts? What are your administration fees? What are your stop loss? We know the -- their capabilities, because we work with all the -- all the vendors in this market with several clients and so it -- a lot of the -- the procurements that I have seen that are done by a procurement department have a lot of questions to gage the capabilities of the -- Cavener: Certainly. Howell: -- vendors that you are working with and because we know that it -- it requires a little bit less formality in the -- in the purchasing and so that -- that pulse check isn't -- as you have mentioned it's not like a broadly used term in the market. I think it came up in a meeting as just kind of a less formal RFP market check and -- Cavener: And so -- Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 26 of 32 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Is it 80 percent of those that you represent use the pulse check? Fifty percent? Howell: I think it, frankly, depends on their situation; right? If they are -- if they are really comfortable with the partners that they have and they are just wanting to make sure that it's financially competitive, it -- it's really that less formal market check process. If there are major cost or service issues, then, that generally -- generally leads to a more formal RFP process in anticipation of probably a bigger move. And percentage wise, again, because it's just conditional on -- on the situation, I don't have a percentage for you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. So, you know, this is interesting, because I have been trying to wrap my head around this. I understand that the trust is a separate legal entity from City of Meridian tracking there, but I'm still really perplexed that we are unable legally to use our own city procurement department to run an RFP process in the future. Like I just find -- I find that very perplexing, because it just feels like -- like kind of just like a waste. I mean I see Keith back here, he is the best of the best. I want him to look at every single RFP we ever do. Like I -- you know, I really trust his team. I -- you know, I trust his approach to things. So, I guess maybe I just -- not to like needle you guys anymore about this, I just have more of just an ask, which is before we get to 2027, when it's the appropriate time for us to do an RFP, I would like us to just really take a hard look. Is there a way we can leverage our procurement division to assist with this? Are there some guardrails, you know, like a wall we could put up between certain individuals and procurement? Is there a way to do this so that we can leverage the expertise within our procurement department to at least be looking at everything, just because I -- I just feel like it's just a huge waste to me. I think Gallagher is probably doing an okay job, but, you know, I haven't like assessed your performance or something on this, but I -- I just feel like we have this amazing internal resource. I just find it kind of shocking that we can't find a way to use that resource to kind of check what we are doing. So, I don't know, that's just something I wanted to throw out there. I would like us to explore that more. You know, we have plenty of time. We have got like a year. I would like us to explore that more and really understand that and is there a way to, you know, make sure that, you know, even if they are not directly doing it that they can weigh in on it at a minimum or review or maybe there is a way that they could do an RFP if there are some guardrails put in place. You know, that's just me talking out loud, but that's probably the most surprising thing that I have heard that doesn't make a ton of sense to me. So, I'm just sharing, but -- yeah. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 27 of 32 Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Just have a couple of questions. One question I was wondering about a little bit -- and this is kind of dovetailing off of some of the questions just previously. As a separate entity do we use -- is Gallagher essentially the staffing support for the trustees as they look at that or do we use city staff or HR in other capacities to support the trustees? I understand -- kind of separating a little bit from the RFP process, but also it's the same. I'm kind of curious, do we use city staff for your staffing needs as beneficiaries or as the trustees of the -- of it or is Gallagher essentially kind of the contracted staff? I'm kind of wanting to understand the relationship just a little bit more. Howell: Yeah. Yeah. We -- Gallagher is contracted for subject matter expertise and -- and -- and some work to support the trust and, then, the HR department also provides a lot of support to the -- to the trust as advisors I guess. Oh. Sorry. Nary: So, maybe I can help answer that a little bit. So, primarily the support for HR is because, again, that's the employee contact; right? So, the employees for all the services that are needed use HR as their contact point for any of those things. So, HR does work with Blue Cross, Delta, Willamette, VSP for all of the services that are provided; right? Those are city benefits. So, the trust is there to help manage the program, help create the program, help keep the cost of the program in some level of control and oversee that piece of it, but the administration of it is done by HR and the HR staff. So, Christena, for example, although she's a senior HR generalist, is on the board as a board member, not as an HR representative, but as a board member. Reba, though, does work for HR and her job in benefits is to help again make sure the benefits are being administered correctly through our vendors and maybe I can go back and answer Council Member Strader's question. When I talked to Kevin West he did not say we cannot use the city's process. His recommendation was we should avoid that if we don't -- if we don't need to, if it can be done other ways, because, again, the Department of Insurance likes to make sure there is some separateness to the entity of the trust from the city and the challenge that you have on an RFP is because it's a much more static and a little bit little more static process kind of sometimes answering the questions like the Mayor asked, like how do we evaluate the services that can be provided by this vendor versus that vendor and try to put that into some level of questionnaire and do that? I actually spoke to one of my -- or one of our deputies who recently joined us actually was involved in the state process of that and said it was incredibly complicated to do that through an RFP, because, again, they had no slate to start with, they had no program to start with, so it really was tell us what you can do for us. Here we have a program. We already have something that works for the employees that Gallagher is intimately aware of how it functions and so that's why his -- Mr. West's recommendation was you should use that, that's -- that's you -- that's your best actual resource is the people that understand how this works and, again, not that Mr. Watts and his group don't understand the procurement process, but they don't work intimately with this program. So, it's a little different. That's all. I mean -- so, I just want to make sure -- he didn't say it's like illegal -- illegal to do it or it's not legally okay, it's not recommended. I mean this -- again the state has been pretty clear that they expect to see some Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 28 of 32 separation between the trust function -- originally when we were setting up the trust the question was asked can a council member be on the trust board and the State Department of Insurance said, no, they can't, because that's a funding entity, it's separate and apart from the trust and they felt that was not okay and their reading of their own rules said no. So, they want to maintain some level of separation. So, again, we will evaluate that, Council Woman Strader. I don't have an issue with it. Again, I'm just -- again, I'm not an expert. Scott is. Other folks are. We are going off the advice that we are getting recommended as to how we should function and make sure we stay in good graces with Department of Insurance. We do maintain the best -- you know, the best program for our employees and make sure that, again, there is some connectivity between HR and what the employees are needing. Taylor: Yeah. That's very helpful. I appreciate that. And, Mayor, just one question -- Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: -- just a kind of a simple question. We have entered into two three-year rate guaranteed contracts. Is that a rate guarantee for the administration fees for a set period of time? Is that --just want a cut and clear -- Nary: Yes. Taylor: Okay. Thank you. Simison: And I think just for clarification generally, like as was said, the trust can do an RFP. You could write an RFP and you could have Keith review it in that content. I mean there is -- there is -- it's just what entity is putting out an RFP for review is -- I'm going to say 95 percent of the question. Whether or not you want to do it as one. Who puts it out and does the evaluation compared to going through the city's processes, so -- Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Scott, thanks for being here and full disclosure, company I work with works with Gallagher and they help broker the health benefits for our employees. So, I'm familiar with the work that you do and I see the comparison and this whole pulse check is a term of art that probably none of us were really familiar with, but you know what you provide for our company. In my mind that sounds a lot like a pulse check, because you take our current plan and, then, you compare it to virtually everything else that's offered out in the state and we can look at gold and silver and platinum and titanium and zirconium that's offered by everybody else and we can see their deductibles, their out of pocket, their prescription, their 30 day, their 90 day, mailed, all of that and we can do, then, the comparison as a company and I would assume the same as the trust and we can say we want to stay with what we have or we want to pay more and get this or we want to pay less and get fewer benefits. Is that the pulse check that we are talking Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 29 of 32 about where you are able to just take a -- an environmental scan of what's out there, compare it with what we have, versus in my mind an RFP is kind of going out clean slate, tell us what you can do for us, like -- like Mr. Nary said. Is there a difference in the term of art between the RFP and the pulse check? Howell: No. I think you are -- I think you have got the -- kind of the difference and, again, that that pulse check term I think came up in a meeting -- like it's not a market standard term or anything, I think it just came up in a market check or pulse check -- like just that whole idea is, yeah, we know what we have, we know what our options are. We go to the -- to the vendors who we know can provide what we need. Say here is what we have, what can you do for us, versus an RFP where you need to get more information about maybe vendors that are unknown or to your point plans that -- that aren't set and you are asking for more -- more input there. Simison: And maybe -- maybe we -- can we just get rid of the word pulse check. I mean like I say I just did a benefits market check Google search and Al came back and basically described a hundred percent of what we are talking about. So, if we can just call it a benefits market check moving forward it -- at least is a term of art that Al understands in that context. Howell: And, frankly, in our office, as we do work for clients, it all -- it all kind of falls under the umbrella of an RFP still, like it's just -- the level of questions that you are asking in the RFP, the kind of -- the level of formality. So, it's a lot of the same thing. Simison: Any additional questions, comments? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Make a comment, not a question. As a -- someone who has been self- employed for over five years, who purchased my own plans and benefits on my own and, then, coming to the City of Meridian, we just -- we really do have a tremendous benefit that we offer our employees and so I compliment the Councils and the Mayor and the trustees, all the work that's been done across the board. It's a really tremendous benefit and I think to your point as employees understand the value that we provide I think it's -- it's very very helpful, because we do provide a really really great set of benefits all around and I think -- I want to compliment everyone who is involved in that process all along the way, everything from Bill and trustees to HR and decisions made at the city leadership level over the past few years. Nary: Thank you. And I appreciate that and I will at least add to that one point is, unfortunately, the most difficult thing is that people realize the value when they are leaving and they say now you have to pay for the whole plan yourself and it's no longer covered the same and they realize how much is that? How much do I get -- how much Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 30 of 32 is mine? How much is my family? So, trying to get that in front of them before that is what we strive to do. Simison: Thank you very much. Appreciate everyone being here this evening for the conversation. Nary: Thank you. ORDINANCES [Action Item] 7. Ordinance No. 25-2085: An ordinance (Summerlin West Subdivision — H-2024-0023) annexing all of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the southwest quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 63.965 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (17.274 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (46.691 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: With that we will move on to Item 6, which is Ordinance No. 25-2085. Ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Lomeli: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Ordinance No. 25-2085, an ordinance, Summerlin West Subdivision, H-2024-0023, annexing all of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 , Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho, and unplatted portions of the southwest quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 63.965 acres of such real property from RUT to R-8, 17.274 acres, Medium-Density Residential and R-15, 46.691 acres, Medium-High Density Residential zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 31 of 32 Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read its entirety? If not do I have a motion? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2085. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2085. Is there any discussion? If not Clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, got a big speech this week. Just want to let you know how much we support you and looking forward to hearing you provide our community with an update at your annual State of the City. Apologies I won't be there in person. Watch it online. Simison: Thank you very much. Yeah. It can stream from any airline anywhere. Cavener: I made sure to buy the premium WiFi. I want to be able to hear it in its entirety. Mr. Mayor, with that I move we adjourn the meeting. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn the meeting. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Meridian City Council June 3,2025 Page 32 of 32 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:35 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-17-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-17-2025 E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic E IDIAN �-- IDAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Elder Abuse Awareness Month Proclamation WE IDIAN The Office of the .Mayor PROCI AMATION Whereas, ageism and social isolation are major causes of elder abuse in the United States; and, Whereas, after a lifetime of contributions to their families, their communities, and our state, every Idahoan deserves to live out his or her days in health and security, yet, every year, millions of older Americans are denied the opportunity due to abuse, neglect or exploitation; and, Whereas, preventing abuse, neglect and exploitation of older adults through maintaining and improving social supports will allow everyone to continue to live independently as possible and contribute to the life and vibrancy of our communities; and, Whereas, 2025 marks the 19th Annual World Elder Abuse Awareness Day. Its recognition will promote a better understanding of abuse, neglect and exploitation of older adults; and, Whereas, organizations like the Ada County Victim Services Center recognize the importance of taking action to raise awareness of abuse, neglect and exploration of older adults. Therefore, I Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim June 2025 as ECder .Abuse Awareness Month in the City of Meridian and call upon the citizens, government agencies, and public and private institutions in Meridian to recommit to our community to increasing awareness and understanding of elder abuse and the steps.,our citizens ca take to protect our elders. Dated this 3"d day of June, 2025 Ro ert E�S Aon, Mayor Luke Cavener, City Council President Liz Strader, City Council Vice-President John Overton, City Council Anne Little Roberts, City Council Doug Taylor, City Council Brian Whitlock, City Council a i !U E IDIAN �-- IDAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Owyhee High School Softball State Champions Day Proclamation E IDIAN 71he Office of the Nayor PROCALAM .�I 12 OW Whereas, being an Owyhee High School Softball player is more than making pitching, fielding, hitting, and achieving state titles . It is training to build leadership , character, confidence, teamwork and resilience — all traits needed to succeed on the field, in the classroom and in the real world; and, Whereas, The Storm were the team to beat all season with a 28 - 1 overall record and an 11 .0 conference record, winning the Southern Idaho title and advancing to the state championship tournament; and, Whereas, the top - seeded Owyhee Storm won their first three games of the state tournament by an average of 7 . 6 runs ; and, Whereas, Owyhee rallied for a 3 - 2 win to cap off an unbeaten run through the double -elimination tournament and captured a second title in the past three years ; and, Whereas , the leadership , training and discipline of their coaches John Carpenter, Cal Fazzio , Katie Edwards , Dani McGrath, and Kelley Gibbons helped team members Haiyley Brennan, Kenadi Garrett, Avery Hessing, Grace Groulx, Mia Mikell , Ava Grandstaff, Haiylee Reeves , Grace Brooks , Elysa Gaytan, McKenna Schab , Alaina Bryant, Maddilynn McNulty, Saylor Shoemaker, Hailey Bock, SoBella Malliarodokis , Bristol Reeves , C . C . Gieser, Madalynn Mahaffey, and Bre Berg to focus their talents and passion to become a winning team, with each player making valuable contributions to their victory . Therefore, 1, Mayor Robert E . Simison, hereby proclaim June 3rd , 2025 as Owyhee High SchooCSoftbaCC Of State Cham_p ions Day in the City of Meridian and call upon the community to join me in congratulating the Storm on their remarkable athletic achievement and for r 7 s n ' ng Meridian so proudly in the state tournament. Dated this Y'd day of June, 2025 o ert E . S ' mi on, Mayor Luke Cavene , City Council President Liz Strader, City Council Vice-President John Overton, City Council Y Anne Little Roberts, City Council Ff Doug Taylor, City Council Brian Whitlock, City Council PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: June 3, 2025 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 3 PROJECT NAME: Program Year 2025 Community Development Block Grant Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) i If yes, please provide HOA name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 i � - tee . � k � 1� . 77 _.,._ E IDIAN:--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Program Year 2025 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan Meridian CDBG PY25 Action Plan Summary Introduction The City of Meridian, an Entitlement Community, has received annual funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's(HUD)Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program since 2007. The City is currently operating under the Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan)for program years 2022- 2026.This plan outlines strategies,goals, and community development needs identified through collaboration with community members and local entities. This Action Plan covers the fourth year of the 2022-2026 Con Plan,guiding the City's CDBG Program for Program Year 2025 (PY25),from October 1, 2025,to September 30, 2026.The PY25 Action Plan summarizes actions, activities, and resources to be utilized during PY25 to address the goals and priority needs identified in the 2022-2026 Con Plan. Objectives and Outcomes Meridian's 2022-2026 Con Plan is a strategic plan to meet the housing and community development needs of low and moderate-income and special needs households.The Con Plan serves as: • A planning document built on a participatory process among citizens,organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders. • A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant program. • A strategy for carrying out HUD programs. • A management tool for assessing performance,tracking success, and determining the course of future Con Plans. Evaluation of Past Performance At the end of each program year, Meridian provides an annual report to HUD, known as the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report(CAPER).This report includes: • Description of available resources. • Investment of resources. • Geographic distribution and location of investments. • Assistance provided to families and persons, including racial and ethnic distribution. • Actions taken to affirmatively further fair housing. • Other actions indicated in the Strategic Plan and the Action Plan. Performance reporting serves to: 1. Provide HUD with the necessary information to assess each grantee's ability to carry out relevant CPD programs in compliance with applicable rules and regulations. 2. Provide information for HUD's Annual Report to Congress. 3. Allow grantees to describe their successes in meeting objectives stipulated in their Con Plan. City of Meridian Community Development Block Grant Program(CDBG) PY25 Action Plan Summary Citizen Participation and Consultation Process Citizen participation actively encourages input from the low and moderate-income population in planning the five-year Con Plan,the Action Plan, Substantial Amendments, and the CAPER.The City seeks broad participation, particularly from low-and moderate-income persons, residents of predominantly low-and moderate-income neighborhoods, minorities, non-English speaking persons, persons with disabilities, public housing residents, local and regional institutions, businesses, developers, and nonprofit organizations. All public meetings are held in locations convenient to residents, especially potential or actual beneficiaries. Citizen participation is a critical part of completing the needs assessment, market analysis,and construction of the goals and priorities in the Con Plan and the PY25 Action Plan. Summary of Public Comments Meridian documents all comments received during the public participation process, including feedback from online surveys.These comments and survey results shaped the specific priorities and goals in the Con Plan, which are included in the PY25 Action Plan, ensuring alignment with community needs. City of Meridian Priority Needs and Goals The City of Meridian's 2022-2026 Con Plan addresses three primary priority needs. • Decent Housing:The focus on providing decent housing by preserving and increasing affordable housing, supporting housing for special needs groups, and transitioning homeless persons and families into stable housing. • Suitable Living Environment:The City aims to create a suitable living environment by enhancing neighborhood safety and livability, promoting the integration of low to moderate-income (LMI) residents, and reinvesting in deteriorating areas. • Economic Opportunities:The plan seeks to expand economic opportunities by promoting homeownership, supporting community development for long-term viability, and empowering LMI individuals to achieve self-sufficiency. To meet these needs,the plan identifies the following goals: • Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvement:The plan aims to improve public facilities and infrastructure such as neighborhood facilities and sidewalks. • Public Services:The City will fund various services to help low to moderate income residents maintain their housing stability. Examples of services include emergency rental assistance and childcare scholarships. • Housing:The City will focus on increasing access to safe and affordable housing through activities such as homeownership assistance and homeowner repairs. • Program Administration:This goal will cover administrative costs,fair housing initiatives, and ensure compliance with federal regulations to effectively manage the program. 2 1 P a g e City of Meridian Community Development Block Grant Program(CDBG) PY25 Action Plan Summary Proposed Projects for PY25 1. Emergency Rental Assistance—$43,483 to Jesse Tree to help prevent eviction by covering rent for households at risk of homelessness. 2. Youth Scholarships—$35,000 to the Boys&Girls Club to provide extended care and after-school program scholarships. 3. Homeowner Repairs—$193,868 to NeighborWorks Boise for critical home repairs, including weatherization, accessibility, and emergency improvements. 4. Better Walkways—$193,867 for improvements in areas identified in the CDBG Walkability Study. Projects may include new sidewalks, curb ramps, lighting, and other safety enhancements.The primary project will receive full funding first,with any additional or reallocated funds being applied to alternate projects. Primary Project • NW 7th Street (from W. Carlton to Cherry Ln.):Additional funding will complete remaining phases; Phase 1 was funded in PY24. Alternate Projects • E. Badley Ave near NE 2%St and E. 3rd St,with potential extensions along NW 2%St between Badley and Washington. • E.Washington Ave between NE 2%St and NE 4th St. • A new pedestrian path across the Jackson Drain, connecting Fairview Terrace Estates with Chief Joseph Elementary to improve safe routes to school. 3 1 P a g e Meridian CDBG Program to September 30, 20262025October 1, PY25 Action Plan CDBG Action Plan intend to meet our goals.Annual plan that says how we Consolidated Plan goals and provides direction.year plan that identifies -5 Federal Funding Urban Development (HUD).the Department of Housing and Meridian receives funds from Overview Year 4 Program Administration•Public Services•Permanent Housing•Public Improvements•2026 Consolidated Plan Goals:-2022 Breakdown by Goal PY25 Funding: $523,218 Action Plan City Year Consolidated Plan process.-5community feedback during the Projects are chosen based on Public Improvements in the CDBG Walkability Study.Implements projects identified Program Administration of the program.management, and compliance Supports the planning, ProjectsLed - Program Fair Housing•Planning for Upcoming Consolidated Plan•General Administration•Activities Allocation: $57,000Federal Cap: $104,644 Administration Public Improvements Better Walkways Terrace Estates to a Safer School Route Pathway across Jackson Drain to Connect Fairview ⚬E. Washington Ave between NE 2½ St and NE 4th St⚬E. Badley Ave near NE 2½ St and E. 3rd St⚬Alternative Projects: •funding to complete remaining phases)Primary: NW 7th from W Carlton to Cherry Ln (additional •Walkability Study.Improve sidewalks and lighting in areas identified in the CDBG 867,193$:Allocation Partner term needs.-immediate, shortPublic Services: Addresses •term housing solutions.-longPermanent Housing: Supports •processes.distinct competitive application Projects are selected through two Meridian Resident limits.Participants must live within city Income Eligible household).person -AMI ($85,600 for a 4Income is no more than 80% Housing Stability Connection must be evident.Projects Public Services$35,000-Scholarships for Youth $43,483-Emergency Rental Assistance losing their housing. Temporary rental assistance for those at risk of summer programs.Access to childcare including extended care and 483,78$:AllocationCap: $78,483Federal Housing 868,193$:Allocation$193,868-Homeowner Repair Weatherization, accessibility, and emergency repair. Next July 31July 22July 8 Submitted to HUDConsent AgendaFinal Report and Resolution on ClosesPublic Hearing/Comment Period Steps Learn meridiancity.org/cdbg0575-ccampbell@meridiancity.org For More Information Contact Crystal at:the website for updates.check —person events are being scheduled-More in•Public Hearing on July 8 at Meridian City Hall•Online Survey (available on the website)•July 30 at 3:00 PM⚬June 18 at 10:00 AM⚬Virtual Open House•Ways to Participate Feedback!your Share More & C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline Changes to Agenda: Item #4: Centrepoint Apartments MDA (H-2025-0009) Application(s):  Development Agreement Amendment Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of approximately 11 acres of land, zoned RUT in Ada County, located at 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Lane. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Mixed-Use Regional History: The subject application encompasses two (2) parcels located south of E. Ustick Road (Parcels S1105110111 and S1105110120. Parcel S1105110111 was part of a Development Agreement Modification and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application in 2019 that removed the subject parcel from an existing Development Agreement (DA) for the purpose of entering into a new DA with a new conceptual plan and building elevations (H-2018-0121, DA Inst. # 2019-060877) and a request for a new athletic club and spa (indoor recreation facility), Villasport. The CUP approval for the indoor recreation facility has since expired and the property was sold. The current CUP and DA (H-2022-0035 DA Inst# 2022-079000) was approved to construct a mixed-use development consisting of commercial space and a 213-unit multi-family development in lieu of an athletic club/spa and commercial building. Summary of Request: The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project approval that was received in 2022 (H-2022-0072) with the modification to the existing Development Agreement (Instrument No. 2022-079000) for the existing 11 acres. The modification will create two (2) new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. Development Agreement Modification: The applicant is requesting the following changes to the Development Agreement: • Parcel E (3100 Centrepoint Way) - The required landscape street bu ff ers and multi-use pathway segments shall be constructed and vegetated with the residential phase of development along E. Ustick Road; the proposed 25-foot landscape bu ff er along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the residential phase – Parcel E of development. • Parcel F (3030 N. Cajun Lane) - The required landscape street bu ff ers and multi-use pathway along N. Eagle Road will be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel – Parcel F. On December 3, 2024, the City Council approved findings for H02024-0019 for modifications to the existing Development Agreement (DA) H-2022-0035 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) H-2022-0072 to facilitate the construction of a 239-unit multifamily affordable apartment project. This proposal strictly pertains to the residential component of the approved development plan. The applicant also requested alternative compliance for the to the open space and parking lot landscaping. In January of 2025, that applicant terminated the entitlements and withdrew their application for the Centrepoint Apartments project (H-2024-0019 ALT, CUP, MDA) due to complications at the State level with project financing. An administrative time extension (TED-2023-0002) was approved for a two-year period in April of 2023. Prior to the expiration date of April 1, 2025, the applicant submitted an application for an additional two-year During the review process for H-2024-0019, ITD required the applicant to dedicate twelve (12) feet of right-of-way on Eagle Road and reconstruct the right turn lane to Seville Lane. The current DA requires the landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments to be constructed and vegetated with the first phase of development along E. Ustick Road and N. Eagle Road as well as the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries of development. The applicant is proposing to create two development agreements for the following reasons: • To allow landscape street buffers and pathways along E. Ustick Road as well as the 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries to be developed with the residential development on Parcel E. Staff is requiring the frontage improvements along E. Ustick Road are installed no later than a year after approval of the development agreement modification as this is the final missing link leading up to Eagle Road. Staff removed this sentence from the staff report as it wasn’t made as a condition of approval for the DA. • To allow the landscape buffer and pathway along N. Eagle Road to be constructed with the commercial development on Parcel F as well as the right-of-way dedication and proposed improvements to Eagle Road. Therefore, each parcel owner will be responsible for the improvements outlined in each of their development agreements. Written Testimony: None Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2025-0009 as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of June 3, 2025, with the following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend denial of File Number H-2025-0009, as presented during the hearing on June 3, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2025-0009 to the hearing date of ______ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance) h2 City Council MeetingJune 3, 2025 FLUM Aerial MapZoning Map proposed improvements to Eagle Road. way dedication and the ofWork with ITD regarding rightParcel Fdevelopment. boundaries shall be constructed with the residential phase of foot landscape buffer along the west and south the proposed 25phase of development along E. Ustick Road and N. Eagle Road; segment shall be constructed and vegetated with the residential use pathway The required landscape street buffers and multiParcel EindependentlySeparate the DA so both properties can develop E IDIAN:--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing (Continued from May 13, 2025) for Centrepointe Apartments (H-2025-0009) by Mike Maffia, MGM Meridian 2, located at 3100 Centrepointe Way and 3030 N. Cajun Ln. Application Materials: https:Hbit.ly/H-2025-0009 A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to modify the existing Development Agreement (H-2022-0035, Instrument# 2022-079000) for the existing 11.17 acres and create two (2) new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. i PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: June 3, 2025 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 4 PROJECT NAME: Centrepointe Apartments (H-2025-0009) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING April 22,2025 continued to Legend DATE: May 13,2025 ® Project Location Area of Impact TO: Mayor&City Council �_ city Limits --,, OAnalysis FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 �" " < 1. lritter@meridiancity.org - r APPLICANT: Mike Maffia,MGM2 SUBJECT: H-2025-0009 ^� ------ Centrepoint Apartments MDA _ LOCATION: 3100 N. Centrepoint Way and 3030 N. Cajun Lane,located in the NE'/4 of -- Section 5,Township 3N,Range I �- (Parcel(s)# S 1105110111 and S1105110120) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project approval that was received in 2022 (H-2022-0072)with the modification to the existing Development Agreement(Instrument No. 2022-079000) for the existing 11.17 acres. The modification will create two(2)new agreements which will allow each property to be developed independently. B. Issues/Waivers In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. The applicant is proposing to move forward with the project that was previously approved in 2022 (H-2022-0072). C. Recommendation Recommend approval of the proposed Development Agreement modification. D. Decision City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1•Land Use Description Details Mal)Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-Family Residential and Commercial - Existing Zoning C-G VI.A.2 Proposed Zoning C-G Adopted FLUM Designation MU-R VI.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation MU-R Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 1/28/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 2/25/2025 Site posting date 4/3/2025 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Centrepoint Apartments MDA H-2025-0009 (copy this link into a separate browser). Table 3:Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2018-0121 (Villasport CUP,MDA);H-2021-0006(CUP),H-2022-0035 (MDA,DA Inst.#2022-079000);H-2024-0019(ALT,CUP,MDA)—this application was approved but the applicant terminated their entitlement rights;TED-2023-0002;TEC-2025-0001 Phasing Plan None Residential Units 213 multi-family units-One(1)two-story building and five(5)3-story buildings Open Space 6.78 acres(295,401 s.f.)of qualified open space proposed according to the open space exhibit(approximately 40%). Amenities At a minimum, 13 amenities are proposed—See the amenity Exhibit in Section VII below. Physical Features The Milk Lateral has previously been piped and there is a thirty(30)foot irrigation easement that goes through the property. Acreage 11.17 Lots 2 Density Gross—21.3 du/ac. City of Meridian Department Report IL Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject application encompasses two(2)parcels located south of E. Ustick Road(Parcels S 1105110111 and S 1105110120. Parcel S 1105110111 was part of a Development Agreement Modification and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)application in 2019 that removed the subject parcel from an existing Development Agreement(DA) for the purpose of entering into a new DA with a new conceptual plan and building elevations(H-2018-0121,DA Inst. #2019-060877)and a request for a new athletic club and spa(indoor recreation facility),Villasport. The CUP approval for the indoor recreation facility has since expired and the property was sold. The current CUP and DA(H-2022-0035 DA Inst#2022-079000)was approved to construct a mixed-use development consisting of commercial space and a 213-unit multi-family development in lieu of an athletic club/spa and commercial building. In 2024,CUP and DA modifications were approved with a deed restricted affordable multi- family development with 239 units. The applicant terminated his entitlements and withdrew his application due to complications at the State level with project financing. B. Development Agreement Modification The applicant is requesting the following changes to the Development Agreement: • Parcel E(3100 Centrepoint Way) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments shall be constructed and vegetated with the residential phase of development along E.Ustick Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the residential phase—Parcel E of development. • Parcel F (3030 N. Cajun Lane) -The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway along N. Eagle Road will be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel—Parcel F. C. Staffs Analysis Staff has no objection to the Applicant's request for a modification to the existing development agreement(H-2021-0103,Inst. 92022-066859)to create two(2)new development agreements so that each parcel can develop independently. On December 3,2024,the City Council approved findings for H02024-0019 for modifications to the existing Development Agreement(DA)H-2022-0035 and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)H- 2022-0072 to facilitate the construction of a 239-unit multifamily affordable apartment project. This proposal strictly pertains to the residential component of the approved development plan. The applicant also requested alternative compliance for the to the open space and parking lot landscaping. In January of 2025,that applicant terminated the entitlements and withdrew their application for the Centrepoint Apartments project(H-2024-0019 ALT,CUP,MDA)due to complications at the State level with project financing. An administrative time extension(TED- 2023-0002)was approved for a two-year period in April of 2023. Prior to the expiration date of April 1,2025,the applicant submitted an application for an additional two-year During the review process for H-2024-0019,ITD required the applicant to dedicate twelve (12) feet of right-of-way on Eagle Road and reconstruct the right turn lane to Seville Lane. The current DA requires the landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segments to be constructed and vegetated with the first phase of development along E.Ustick Road and N. Eagle Road;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the first phase of development. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis The applicant is proposing to create two development agreements for the following reasons: • To allow landscape street buffers and pathways along E.Ustick Road as well as the 25- foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries to be developed with the residential development on Parcel E. E. Ustiek Read are insta4led no later-gian a yeai-7 after-appr-&val of the development agfeement medifiea4ien as this is�he final fnissiiig 14+k leadiiig up to Eagle Read. • To allow the landscape buffer and pathway along N. Eagle Road to be constructed with the commercial development on Parcel F. Therefore,each parcel owner will be responsible for the improvements outlined in each of their development agreements. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. Development Agreement Modification(Parcel E—Multi-family): 1.1 The modified Development Agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council approval of the Findings. The Development Agreement shall,at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of the site shall be substantially consistent with the submitted concept plan and color renderings included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. Future development of Parcel E shall comply with the standards outlined in the multi-family development specific use standards,UDC 11-4-3-27. c. All future pedestrian crossings that traverse shared drive aisles within the development shall be constructed with brick,pavers, stamped concrete,or colored concrete to clearly delineate the driving surface from the pedestrian facilities,per UDC 11-3A-19B.4b. d. The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segment shall be constructed and vegetated with the€rrst residential phase of development along E. Ustick Road and N. Eagle R,,..a;the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the&4 residential phase of development. e. Applicant shall work with ACHD to construct a safe pedestrian crossing from the central multi-family site area to the parking lot along the west boundary across N. Centrepoint Way. f. With the future Conditional Use Permit for the multi-family development,the building along the west boundary shall be no more than two-stories in height and the three (3)buildings within the center of the project shall be no more than three- stories in height,consistent with the Applicant's revised concept plan and presentation to Council. g. Applicant shall continue the masonry wall along the west property boundary consistent with adjacent development and help buffer the proposed project. h. Staff and Applicant shall work with ACHD to mark Centrepoint Way as no- parking on both sides,should ACHD allow it. i. is to Eagle Read-. j. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions Development Agreement 42 (Parcel F -Commercial): a. Future development of the site shall be generally consistent with the submitted concept plan included in Section VI of Exhibit B and the provisions contained herein. b. The required landscape street buffers,multi-use pathway,and decorative lighting along N. Eagle Road shall be constructed and vegetated with the development of the Commercial Parcel. c. A shared access easement and parking agreement shall be granted between the Commercial Parcel (F)and the Residential Parcel (E)allowing vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress across both properties unless a property boundary adjustment has been completed. A recorded copy of said easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. d. Applicant shall work with ITD regarding right-of-way dedication and the proposed improvements to Eagle Road. B. Meridian Public Works Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. Water is about 200ft from the Property boundary for parcel S 1105110120. 2. Any changes to public water infrastructure must be approved by public works. 3. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 4. Provide 20'Easements for mains,hydrant laterals and water services. Easements should extend up to the end of main/hydrant/water meter and 10'beyond it. 5. No permanent structures(trees,bushes,buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls,fences, infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)to be built within the utility easement. General Conditions of Approval 1. Applicant shall coordinate water and sewer main size and routing with the Public Works Department. 2. Per Meridian City Code (MCC),the applicant shall be responsible to install sewer and water mains to and through this development. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agreement for infrastructure enhancement per MCC 8-6-5. 3. The applicant shall provide easement(s) for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). Sewer/water easement varies depending on sewer depth. Sewer 0-20 ft deep require a 30 ft easement,20-25 ft a 40 ft easement,and 25-30 ft a 45 ft easement. Ensure no permanent structures (trees,bushes, buildings,carports,trash receptacle walls, fences,infiltration trenches,light poles,etc.)are built within the utility easement. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 81/2"x I I"map with bearings and distances(marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. 4. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available,a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions 5. Any structures that are allowed to remain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in compliance with MCC. 6. All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive of natural waterways,intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42- 1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. 7. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development,and if so,how they will continue to be used,or provide record of their abandonment. 8. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. 10. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection fees,as determined during the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 13. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The design engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. A street light plan will need to be included in the civil construction plans. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-5 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting. A copy of the standards can be found at ht!p://www.meridiancily.org/public works.aMx?id=272. 19. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a performance surety in the amount of 125%of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer,water and reuse infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 20. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20%of the total construction cost for all completed sewer,water and reuse infrastructure for duration of two years. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. C. Meridian Park's Department https://weblink.meridiancity.orgj ebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo MeridianCit Y- D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) hyps://weblink.meridiancity.oMg/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X E. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id 389740&dbid 0&repo=MeridianCit X V. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested Development Agreement Modification per the conditions of approval included in Section IV. B. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action � 1 1 Locationcog ct Analysis � of Impact MIN } Ell F. M' ' 1 77 r � r s uJ Legend ,' �■ nulls �uw. vuul� Project Location ��t■����� �nnm �,�uuun■g1111�� I 1r��` w:�` ••1tt•■ % iiniiiii:1111f \r111��ii �In 7 ,� _•�omu�i■■m w�1.111��Il♦1:::: ♦ vn4■ • Area :o�i ���•C►i ones _ Analysis HIM gas nm •■ nr nnnu n■. 1 w•mm�fill IIIIIIIIIII - - IIIDunn � � i mill •p'■q�•u ■��-i. - 111111111111•/ n III ZZ ♦♦�♦�� � 111::1111: ♦♦�♦♦ems"% '� ' 111::IIIIC •�♦�. ■r� Pnm •nw un.�l m\3 ��'`I un uuu uR.rimm �i:�im wul nm�n� ■■ �i�•':::�n�.. W I 1111„�i r.fi■■ti.■ilrnu J / n unuu■-uuun E§ ""„ ■ uuunu■■li��=ou ■uuilGm nrw►►Autil.1► ly ■■■�1� pan■n Ilp•■■■I.1l�R�.. • .u■ V • nqi■-u■ •. 1 Project Location • - • o I. 1�iom■..!♦onuu►■11111 �t1111■:u II.i1I\��.i�f ■'� �� /..w u■��III/�III>I.11 _a of Impact sellspoll - .T soon 0Analysis -G��1i4jig1� uuuuwum -nia.Offic� �i=■���•' ,""1 WWAAM ON ON EM ON in Nip own ►�1■ /�I�Vun►�Qn 11/uunn-.1 _ :nnu ,,p.::ug0►p`����� ■■u■■p�q/� uluu■uai_ �Iu11►�.►0�\►11j►4•�:i�NOR►������ ■.��1 I\��f� Off .i._ i�� �►i•\\iA kill 1n11C--- Was .u►�� a 9►`��� ��.w o nu:w.� �� .�■. n.411npu.� .■m I■■1 � m r p '�nllllll W m 11 ■■. /1.1111 1::-_III ■ 1■'.I ii 1�1�1�1 �=lilt �rnlOumn maw. us- �uflllll ����`■ I�p�lugp►. O uO� loo ► n■ , IIIIIIIIIIIINi n ♦ pool. 1 nw lilt.. n1•n: Iunn......as �,�■ p`-'�::�:�: ►��:::::.■f♦♦Its♦♦♦• lilt. ■m -some I u■■r/.D be-►u, Legend 11=;r/ ■M�I.II���I,I�I�►_���::�■>,iu��•����Im`or� �i_■inn■U / iiuiw►.l.l11O111l"�'�rc1n uuu.uA . E�. s 11 Project —nnu.. m iI.p.um■u�Ic111�II�11111 ,.� •��nil•== --_ ... �_':_�1��•Ij�4i1� uuumunnu 1••1{ 'oiinwil=I���, �" ♦ �..... �nnu.► ■ ■..jam�•�:en�� �:•♦♦i♦♦�•._��� /� i■ r���IJI�■■■ ,\■■■I�� Area of Impact ones I Beano City Limits mom Planned Parcels ./�Vum�► /u■n►►.:►1�=1,:. ...Ian ♦�.♦ . np�Q•i � � un... U..III►♦��� i 0 Analysis mnuu. �- ��� � olio����.�,..■�►I/1119in = a uaiY a ■■�1plr.f� iii i ►■= lL �■ :►�. � � ro�nm a .■.�' nu. ,�:y��.unu■�=nn--■4+ � r1■� . 1 _. r ■u o■■■Q.Pgp u. :GI=.� ,� � �'�$:'•.Bunn=_�►■.����r �i ��:_� �j ♦• 1.:��nn'aurG \__. �� i: _ � Pm.nn?p1•t � ��■� � nn■.:.= 0 nu. ■ ml n■nn.■ nunnul ugp11111 � � ,now np1. �� ��� ♦ 11111■ _ !M� f- ��ii .1 111111111111■/ 11 .nll.uu.: J�� V� ui.�e�:• {.Ip: �.:c lid. Inlnril •�♦Q♦. nu■u- . �: nll n1u1■.■_:-• IIIP 1�I i •i J nnnr�'.: I� '�ii1j111 i Cpll::� nud/.n non►um L\ -'-1 ■e�uu�l ■nnnuu pp/ nn■��Iii r:fi..i::�l�nu■■nn�■•�-y� W 'II uuv 1 m ,Lw■■nu�wllilG....n■I�"i..uL•I�11■ W ■u l■ ui pumas.uuw Ip►�nnnmm�umuu nqi.-m n ■ :��i��I�OP�map►JFaTTT B. Subject Site Photo 4 1 .� .v _ �- '' •._ «a,.,y;rd.. - '" ` s_ rx . .ram---' -.. '' _ City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits C. Approved Site Plan—Parcel E(date: 8/30/2022) SITE INFORE4�TEOr, LEGEND ---- ---- --- --------- CONCEPT SITE PLAN-CENTREPOINT Eagle A Uwdck Meridian,ID AUSUSt 3U,LOU aea=aaaae" Ku H= City of Meridian I Department Report V1. Exhibits 0 0 0 i e a o �8a�@Y�•4' �c��•'� F o gLfI j � SBN - 00 E. Approved Landscape Plan-Parcel E (date: 9/19/2022) caxarr ruMrsexmuu LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CONCEPT LANSCAPE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT Eagle&Ustick Meridian,ID Kimley))Horn----) City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits m �o rtivxr� Pill Pill I e iYltf�ti r�� tl�� - rr Approved Open Space and Amenity Exhibit—Parcel E(date: 9/19/2022) OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ronu e�Anv, wwcw.sxeFl rn[µ bast/ .mow.[ .ru_i.r si VI1 FA�M L'I6i�au»n. ;I L, LI �1i1 brill I - it _ii_il — �I LJ r � I a � OPEN SPACE , CONCEPT OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT-CENTREPOINT Eagle&Ustick Meridian,ID Kimley Morn City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits G. Approved Building Elevations—Parcel E (date: 8/30/2022) - - - - -- BUILDING A-EAST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING A-WEST ELEVATION S k BLM..JFPSRYJ' - &0 All --- TO o R11 III IV, III III l[aA-��Cn2`I I WN BUILDING A-SOUTH ELEVATION 2 n. I eT o� BUILDING A-NORTH ELEVATION 'I vie.=..-o. BUILDING A - ELEVATIONS AP0.30 2223-BUILDING A BOISE,ID DBIM22 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits ya# - -pi r 0.inPPa a00r -w-u PccP//.. o Ofuo� c.ffxi`I Ago B.P3C-RCGiI BID00 BUILDING D-WEST ELEVATION 4 BUILDING D-NORTH ELEVATION 2 v1a=r o• 1Hr-T-v t. c, ® ® ®_- ar -- — r �r BUILDING D-EAST ELEVATION 3 BUILDING D-SOUTH ELEVATION 1 BUILDING E ELEVATIONS AP0.34 2223-BUILDING E BOISE.ID 08/30/2022 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits f --- M I A4,. BUILDING V momNEIEVA7 4 BUILDING IF WEST ELEVATION 2 BULGING F.SOUTH ELEVATNNI 3 BUILDING F-EAST ELEVATION'I BUILDING F-ELEVATIONS AP0.35 2223-BUILDING F oor_o ce,mccc City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits Employee Benefit Trust CITY OF MERIDIAN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS BENEFITS J. Kevin West, Trust CounselJustin Northway, TrusteeEli Daniel, TrusteeChristena Barney, TrusteeChair-Alex Freitag, Trust ViceBill Nary, Trust Chair PLAN TRUST (COMEBPT) Council Questions from 5/20/25 Presentation renewal estimates still pending.13% higher, but final 2026 -progressed claims were higher than projected. Our estimates are currently 6% using part of fund balance would be appropriate to offset the potential 4%. However, as plan year recommended rate increase from carrier, broker and actuarial (4%), Trustees made determination that size fund the trust. Based on fund balance at end of 2023 and -date has tried to right-The Trust to•Why was there no increase last year and now a potential 17% increase this year?•12/31/26) NOTE: There would be a financial penalty to cancel.2026 (ends -2023 and then 2024-year Rate Guarantee agreements with BCI, 2021-Entered into two 3Funding. -Benefits Committee decided not to market with transition to Self-2020 for plan year 2021 •Marketed by Mercer (City’s Broker of Record at the time)-2017 for plan year 2018 •When was the last time the plan was marketed or pulse checked?•prescribed only 4 are GLP drugs, approximately >10% of the total cost of RX claims.They are not driving large claims which make up largest portion of plan costs. Of the top 30 drugs •GLP drugs driving higher costs of the plan?•up:-Questions during the meeting asked that needed follow Council Direction from 5/20/25 Presentation any questions or concerns before making final selection.Trust to make determination of preferred vendor and share recommendation with Council prior and discuss •Gallagher (City’s Benefit Broker of Record) to Market services for 2027 plan year.•Remain with BCI for the duration of contract (ends 12/31/26). ••experts in the field and have been contracted to do this work.Advised to use Benefits Broker to conduct the process they use as best practices, as they are subject matter •up with Procurement Division to determine if they recommend using the City’s procurement process.-Follow•requirement of the Department of Insurance. It is required to operate and function independent from City.Trust Attorney has advised not to use City’s processes, as the Trust is a separate entity by design and as a •Check the legal requirements of the Trust using the City’s procurement process.•Direction provided to come back and present on: Self City/Trust for carrier selections and negotiations.City’s Benefit Broker of Record has always been consultant to market and make recommendations to Blue Cross of Idaho & Regence have close to identical networks and are very close in cost.funded to ensure market competitiveness.-A market pulse check is best practice when selfservices.are evaluating services over costs, and with a fully insured plan you are primarily focused on costs over funded service model such as a trust we -entities are not necessarily subject to those requirements. With a selfMany public entities are subject to formal procurement requirements. In our experience, trusts as separate Use CaseCarrier Selection, Negotiation SupportStrategy, Carrier Selection, Formal ProcurementTimeline3 weeks–18+ weeks–6OutputQuotes, Directional InsightsFormal Proposals, Scored resultsRequirementsRenewal year Claims and -Detailed Census + 3and Formal Questionnaire year Claims, Renewal, -Detailed Census + 3FI: Premiums, benefits, networksLoss, Service-SF: Admin Services, StopFI: Premiums, benefits, networksLoss, Service-SF: Admin Services, StopPlan TypeFunded (SF) or Fully Insured (FI) -SelfFunded (SF) or Fully Insured (FI)-SelfPurposeentitiesCosts and Administration with other Diligence, Comparison with Market for Quotes, Informal Benchmarking, Due Formal SolicitationAspectMarket Pulse CheckRFPInsured RFP-Funded RFP vs Fully- Points of Clarification Carriers do, however, set rates for Admin Fees, shown here as Net Costs which include stop loss.•Carriers propose rates for Medical and Rx claims based on claims experience, but do not set rates.•deadline.th budget amendment for FY25 planned by June 10Large Claims driving costs that have impacted plan surplus and reserves required by DOI. Anticipated –2025 Large spike in claims, far greater than the 4% proposed–2024 Surplus in Trust account to offset proposed 4% increase–2023 Rebounding from COVID and earning some gains from plan designs–2022 Funded: Less in Net Costs, more in claims due to COVID-Self–2020/2021 Fully Insured: Less employees, but larger amount paid in Net Costs (Administrative Fees)–2018/2019 Points of Clarification, continued plan structure, the Trust pays all claims for each member that are below $225,000.funded -There is also Aggregate Coverage, in case the total plan claims become catastrophic. In that self•not have to pay claims on any individual that accumulates claims totaling over $225,000. Stop Loss is the second part of your fixed administrative cost. This is in place to make sure the Trust does •claims. members with more than $100,000 in claims. In 2024 that increased to 11 members with over $100,000 in claims were Cancer, Gastrointestinal Disorder, and Musculoskeletal Disorders. In 2023 there were 5 claims. Our overall claims were $7,300,000 in 2023 and $9,300,000 in 2024. The top drivers for those Specifically, in looking at utilization year over year, from 2023 to 2024, there was a $2,000,000 increase in •plan, thus are the key driver of overall plan costs.funded -and have continued to trend up in 2025 as well. Claims account for 90% of the total cost for selfSpecifically, plan claims costs have increased 30% from the 2023 to 2024 plan year continued to increase. member cost share for the current plan year though claims costs have here was no increase toT• Points of Clarification, continued which would reduce the cost of this coverage. premium paid for the plan year claims to premium ratio is low, we are eligible for up to a 15% return of premium of 8.9% for plan year 2025. Our Stop Loss Insurance also has a refund agreement, whereby if the 2024 was $115.77 (based on the same subscriber count) totaling $648,775. That is an increase in Stop Loss for 2025 is $126.07 PEPM (467 subscribers), which equates to $706,496 for the year. PEPM for o 3% based on the contract signed in 2024. $295,835. That is a 3% increase, or $34,245 year over year. This fee is capped for 2026 at an increase of as $52.79 (based on same subscriber count) totaling w2024PEPM in equates to $330,080 for the year. Medical Administration for 2025 is $54.37 Per Employee Per Month (PEPM), with 467 subscribers, which o Premiums. of your overall plan cost. These administrative costs include Medical Administration Fees and the Stop Loss Of note: the fixed administrative cost is 10% Renewal increase on Admin fees (paid to carrier) is 3% for 2026. •recommendation to increase funding. is causing the t members it is the $2,000,000 increase in claims and trend of higher claims in 2025 thaTo summarize, the Administration Fees and Stop Loss premium did not drive the increase that is needed for •Still awaiting the final renewal numbers.•17% renewal was highest of a projected range provided early in the year of 7.1% to 17.2% • Questions?City of Meridian Employee Benefits Plan Trust Thank you! �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the Amount of$80,020 for consulting services for new Department of Justice ADA Web Content Accessibility Rule C�l fIEN MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Dave Miles Meeting Date: May 28, 2025 Presenter: Dave Miles Estimated Time: 5 mins Topic: Department of Justice New Rule on Accessibility Standards of Web Content Recommended Council Action: Approve budget amendment for $80,020 to fund consulting services to review and evaluate web content and mobile apps, and provide solutions to ensure that the City of Meridian web content and mobile applications meets the necessary ADA rule. Background: The Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a new rule regarding web content accessibility in April, 2024 that all local government web content and mobile applications shall meet updated ADA guidelines, specifically Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Version 2.11 Level AA. Per the DOJ rule, all cities with 50,000 or more persons shall comply with newly updated guidelines by April 24, 2026. Further details of the requirements are enumerated on the D0J Fact Sheet site. Based on the issuance of the rule, over the summer and fall of 2024 staff reviewed the new rule and discussed its impact and necessary actions that are required to ensure Meridian is in compliance with updated guideline standards. A project team consisting of Communications, Legal and IT evaluated the rule standards,the staff expertise, other agency actions and available resources and tools. Staff also implemented a widget tool which runs a base level analysis and fixes errors found via Al. This is paid for out of the current FY25 operating budget with expenses of$1,600 to date, with a predicted continued $150 per month ongoing cost. With results of the widget tool evaluated and the broader web content requirements identified, staff developed and issued an RFP to identify and engage experts who provide the identified services. Staff received and reviewed nine submissions with a range of scopes, qualifications and costs. Costs ranged from approximately$24,000 to $260,000, along with varying levels of experience, referrals and scopes of work. Through the RFP process, staff selected a consultant to perform the scope of work to include: • review and evaluation all publicly facing City web content, including internet browser, third-party programs and mobile device apps, • prepare and deliver a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation report of the city web content and recommendations for solutions, • staff training for ongoing compliance with laws and strategies to keep content compliant long-term. Page 1 of 2 Discussion: Staff feel that consulting services are the best approach to ensure that Meridian is in compliance with the DOJs new rule no later than April 24, 2026 to meet the rule making deadline for cities of 50,000 or more people. While some exemptions to specific technical standards exist within the rule making and may apply, there is no general, broad-based exception for Meridian to not have to meet this new rule. In addition, Meridian's goals to ensure transparency include access to transparent information and tools for everyone who utilizes Meridian services and sites. Meeting the required new standards and guidelines ensure that we are both compliant with Federal law and achieving our organization goals. In addition, Meridian does not have any current staff that are "the one" resident expert in ADA standards. Rather, Meridian has multiple staff who are knowledgeable of broad requirements and needs based on their subject matter. In discussions among those staff members, the identified preferred option is that council approve this project based, one-time funding need so that Meridian can have a thorough review and report of the organization's systems;implement recommended fixes to ensure the immediate rule making needs are met with the DOJs deadline; and also educate staff who interact with web content and tools on the guidelines and standards that will be required to be maintained over time. <end> Page 2 of 2 5/28/2025 12:37 PM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Personnel Costs Full Time Equivalent(FTE): Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total E 01 1840 41200 1 0 Wages 01 1840 41206 0 PT/Seasonal Wages 01 1840 41210 0 Overtime Please only complete the fields highlighted 01 1840 41304 0 Uniform Allowance in Orange. 01 1840 42021 0 FICA $ Amendment Details 01 1 1840 42022 0 PERSI I $ Title: ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates 01 1 1840 1 42023 0 Worker's Comp $ Department Name: Other Government 01 1 1840 1 42025 0 JEmployee Insurance 1 $ Presenting Department Name: Mayor's Office Total Personnel Costs $ Department#: 1840 Operating Expenditures Primary Funding Source: 1 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description One-Time On-Going Total CIP#: 01 1840 68000 1 0 ADA Compliance $ 80,020 $ 80,020 Project#: 01 1840 0 $ - 01 1840 0 $ Is this for an Emergency? ❑ Yes ❑� No 01 1840 0 $ New Level of Service? ❑ Yes ❑ No 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ Clerks Office Stamp 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 6-3-2025 01 1840 0 $ Date of Council Approval Total Operating Expenditures $ 80,020 $ $ 80,020 Capital Outlay Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Acknowledgement Date 01 1840 0 01 1840 0 Dave Miles via email 5.28.25 01 1840 0 Department Director 01 1840 0 REVIEWED 01 1840 0 [ByToddLavoieat 1:13pm,May28,2025 jfields 5.28.25 01 1840 0 Chief Financial Officer Total Capital Outlay $ Revenue/Donations Approved Luke Cavener via email 5.29.25 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Cou-i-6-11iaison �+-- 01 1840 0 01 1840 0 5-29-25 01 1840 1 0 1 Mayor Total Revenue/Donations $ Total Amendment Request $ 80,020 City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form F:\Budget\FY2025\FY2025 Amendments\1.Pending\FY2025 Budget Amendment Form_OG_ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates 5/28/2025 12:37 PM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Total Amendment Cost-Lifetime Prior Year(s) Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Department Name: Other Government Funding 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Title: ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates Personnel $ - $ $ $ $ Instructions for Submitting Budget Amendments: Operating $ 80,020 $ $ $ $ ➢ Department will send Amendment with Directors signature to Finance(Budget Manager)for review Capital $ - ➢ Finance will send Amendment to Council Liaison for signature Total $ - $ 80,020 $ $ $ $ ➢Council Liaison will send signed Amendment to Mayor Total Estimated Project Cost: $ 80,020 ➢ Mayor will send signed Amendment to Finance(Budget Manager) Evaluation Questions ➢ Finance(Budget Manager)will send approved copy of Amendment to Department Please answer all Evaluation Questions using the financial data referenced above. ➢ Department will add copy of Amendment to Council Agenda using Municode Agenda Manager 1. Describe what is being requested? Budget amendment for funding of consulting services to review,evaluate web content and mobile applications,and provide solutions to ensure that the City of Meridian web content and mobile applications comply with the Department of Justice new rule regarding Accessibility issued April,2024 that all local government web content and mobile applications shall meet updated guidelines,specifically Web Content Accessibility Guidelines(WCAG)Version 2.1,Level AA. All local governments with 50,000 or more persons have until April 24,2026 to comply with new rule. Rule Fact Sheet:https://www.ada.gov/resources/2024-03-08-web-rule/ 2. Why was this budget request not submitted during the current fiscal year budget cycle? r , The rule applies to web content that a state or local government provides or makes available.This includes when a state or local government has an arrangement with someone else who provides or makes available web content for them per DOJ 28 CFR Part 35[CRT Docket No.144;AG Order No.5919-2024] 3. What is thee lanation for not submittin this bud et request durinR the next fiscal vear bud et c cle? Time is of the essence. Staff have been in process of performing base analysis of current systems,implementing an initial widget,reviewing needed services and approach,and developing,issuing and evaluating RFP advertisement and submissions. 4.Describe the proposed method of funding? If funding is split between Funds(i.e. General,Enterprise,Grant),please include the percentage split. List the amounts and sources of anticipated additional revenue that will result from approval of this request. Fund Balance 5.Does this request align with the Department/City's strategic plan? If not,please explain how this request was not included in the Department/City strategic plan? r Yes. Government Excellence. Provide increased accessibility and transparency to government information... 6. Does this request require resources to be provided by other departments? If yes,please describe the necessary resources to be provided by other departments. Yes. Staff services via Legal, IT and Communications. 7.Does this Amendment include any needed Equipment or Software that will utilize the Cit 's network? Yes or No No 8.Is the amendment going to result in the disposal of an asset?(Yes or No) IL No 9.Any additional comments? N/A Total Amendment Request $ 80,020 Every effort should be made to avoid reopening the budget for an amendment. Departments will need to provide backup and appear before the City Council to justify budget amendments. Budget amendments are intended for emergency or mandatory changes to the original balanced budget. Changes to the original balanced budget may cause a funding shortfall. City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form F:\Budget\FY2025\FY2025 Amendments\1.Pending\FY2025 Budget Amendment Form_OG_ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates E IDIAN:--- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 25-2085: An ordinance (Summerlin West Subdivision — H- 2024-0023) annexing all of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the southwest quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 63.965 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (17.274 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (46.691 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034472 Boise,Idaho Pgs=13 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2085 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE (SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION —H-2024-0023) ANNEXING ALL OF LOTS 2 AND 3,BLOCK 1,LAREDO ESTATES SUBDIVISION AS FILED IN BOOK 58 OF PLATS AT PAGES 5500 AND 5501, RECORDS OF ADA COUNTY, IDAHO AND UNPLATTED PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; REZONING 63.965 ACRES OF SUCH REAL PROPERTY FROM RUT (RURAL URBAN TRANSITION) TO R-8 (17.274 ACRES) (MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND R-15 (46.691 ACRES) (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICTS; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO ALTER ALL APPLICABLE USE AND AREA MAPS AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS AND ALL OFFICIAL MAPS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY TREASURER, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Meridian received a written request from property owners Lansing Farms LLC and Open Door Rentals LLC to annex and rezone the land described in the legal descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the maps attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("Subject Property"), which exhibits are incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS,the Subject Property is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-222 to annex the Subject Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby annexes the Subject Property. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby rezones 63.965 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to R-8 (17.274 acres) (Medium-Density Residential) and R-15 (46.691 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION H-2024-0023 Page I SECTION 3. That City Staff is hereby directed to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and its exhibits with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publication, in accordance with law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO,this 3rd day of June , 2025. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 3rd day of June , 2025. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 3rd day of June 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public Commission Expiration: 3-28-2028 ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION H-2024-0023 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: William L.M.Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. 1 Y William L. M.Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2085 An ordinance (Summerlin West Subdivision—H-2024-0023) annexing all of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the southwest quarter of Section 5, Township 2 North,Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 63.965 acres of such real property from RUT(Rural Urban Transition)to R-8(17.274 acres)(Medium- Density Residential) and R-15 (46.691 acres) (Medium-High Density Residential) zoning districts; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor,the Ada County Treasurer,the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B.] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION H-2024-0023 Page 3 EXHIBIT A A Description for Annexation Summerlin Subdivision June 12, 2024 All of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 5 and 6 bears, North 00004'42" West, 2655.92 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 5, North 00004'42" West, 873.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, North 00004'42" West, 1,138.85 feet to the westerly prolongation of the southerly boundary line of Rescue Ranch Subdivision as filed in Book 106 of Plats at Pages 14734 through 14736, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said west boundary line on said southerly boundary line and the westerly prolongation thereof the following seven (7) courses and distances: South 89052'36" East, 696.77 feet; South 68053'16" East, 332.83 feet; South 31°36'40" East, 154.12 feet; South 64034'41" East, 290.61 feet; South 480 18'53" East, 155.34 feet; North 00004'42" West, 535.82 feet; South 89052'36" East, 1,192.35 feet to the Southeast corner of said Rescue Ranch Subdivision; thence on the north-south centerline of said Section 5, South 00000'59" West, 1,081.82 feet to the Northeast corner of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5672 and 5673, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said north-south centerline on the northerly boundary line of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision the following seven (7) courses and �Np,L LAND - distances: ENSF `sG� North 61046'52" West, 361.44 feet; 1 779 South 82033'31" West, 182.68 feet; tt,/I&z �o O0 OF North 6605601" West, 362.91 feet; YM McCP�`� Page 1 of 2 314.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 267.40 feet, a central angle of 67017'03", and a long chord which bears South 79°25'27" West, 296.28 feet; South 45°46'56" West, 829.67 feet; South 57024'55" West, 143.12 feet; South 67027'28" West, 176.39 feet to the Northwest corner of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, coincident with the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 1 of said Laredo Estates Subdivision; thence leaving the northerly boundary of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision on the northerly boundary line of said Lot 4 and the westerly prolongation thereof the following three (3) courses and distances.- North 87028'39" West, 78.00 feet; North 59023'39" West, 474.00 feet; North 51°21'39" West, 214.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 63.965 acres, more or less. End of Description. INK,_ LANO N �\GE N 11779 X � UP /Z Z 0 O� F OF \'o YM MCCK Page 2 of 2 A Description for R-15 Zone Summerlin Subdivision June 12, 2024 A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, T.2N., R.1 E., B.M., from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 5 and 6 bears, North 00004'42" West, 2655.92 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 5, North 00004'42" West, 922.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, North 00004'42" West, 1,019.22 feet to the westerly prolongation of the southerly boundary line of Rescue Ranch Subdivision as filed in Book 106 of Plats at Pages 14734 through 14736, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said west boundary line on said southerly boundary line and the westerly prolongation thereof the following seven (7) courses and distances: South 89052'36" East, 696.77 feet; South 68053'16" East, 332.83 feet; South 31°36'40" East, 154.12 feet; South 64°34'41" East, 290.61 feet; South 48018'53" East, 155.34 feet; North 00004'42" West, 535.82 feet; South 89052'36" East, 1,192.35 feet to the Southeast corner of said Rescue Ranch Subdivision; thence on the north-south centerline of said Section 5, South 00°00'59" West, 1,081.82 feet to the Northeast corner of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5672 and 5673, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said north-south centerline on the northerly boundary line of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, North 61°46'52" West, 206.38 feet; S�ONPL LAN�S E N S G thence leaving said northerly boundary line, North 00000'59" East, 293.70 feet; 11779 `P Z/ 0 O� F p F \' YM McCN Page 1 of 2 thence 49.17 feet on the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 56020'46", and a long chord which bears South 61°50'35" West, 47.21 feet; thence North 89059'01" West, 261.29 feet; thence 120.69 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 23003'00", and a long chord which bears North 78027'31" West, 119.88 feet; thence North 66056'01" West, 170.73 feet; thence 554.28 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 472.00 feet, a central angle of 67017'03", and a long chord which bears South 79025'27" West, 522.98 feet; thence South 45046'56" West, 378.17 feet; thence North 44013'04" West, 22.00 feet; thence South 74055'59" West, 195.03 feet; thence South 45046'56" West, 8.74 feet; thence South 89055'18" West, 671.73 feet; thence North 45004'42" West, 11.31 feet; thence South 89055'18" West, 37.00 feet; thence South 00004'42" East, 35.65 feet; thence 20.44 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 11 042'50", and a long chord which bears South 05056'07" East, 20.41 feet; thence South 8905618" West, 187.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 46.691 acres, more or less. End of Description. LAIV ENS ,0 cc O 1 779 I ZleozYr° �0 y F O F \1A(3 YM MCCPM� Page 2 of 2 A Description for R-8 Zone Summerlin Subdivision June 12, 2024 A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 5 and 6 bears, North 00004'42" West, 2655.92 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 5, North 00004'42" West, 873.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, North 00004'42" West, 119.63 feet; thence leaving said west boundary line, North 89055'18" East, 187.58 feet; thence 20.44 feet on the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 11 042'50", and a long chord which bears North 05056'07" West, 20.41 feet; thence North 00004'42" West, 35.65 feet; thence North 89055'18" East, 37.00 feet; thence South 45004'42" East, 11.31 feet; thence North 89'55'18" East, 671.73 feet; thence North 45046'56" East, 8.74 feet; thence North 74055'59" East, 195.03 feet; thence South 44013'04" East, 22.00 feet; thence North 45046'56" East, 378.17 feet; thence 554.28 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 472.00 feet, a central angle of 67017'03", and a long chord which bears North 79025'27" East, 522.98 feet; thence South 66056'01" East, 170.73 feet; NS ENps thence 120.69 feet on the arc of a curve to the `f left having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 11779 O 23°03'00", and a long chord which bears South � N4/IZ/Z�2 Pao 78027'31" East, 119.88 feet; �p TF O F \' YM MCCN Page 1 of 2 thence South 89059'01" East, 261.29 feet; thence 49.17 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 56020'46", and a long chord which bears North 61°50'35" East, 47.21 feet; thence South 00000'59" West, 293.70 feet to the northerly boundary line of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5672 and 5673, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on said northerly boundary line the following seven (7) courses and distances: North 61°46'52" West, 155.06 feet; South 8203331" West, 182.68 feet; North 66056'01" West, 362.91 feet; 314.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 267.40 feet, a central angle of 67°17'03", and a long chord which bears South 79025'27" West, 296.28 feet; South 45046'56" West, 829.67 feet; South 57024'55" West, 143.12 feet; South 67°27'28" West, 176.39 feet to the Northwest corner of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, coincident with the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 1 of said Laredo Estates Subdivision; thence leaving the northerly boundary of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision on the northerly boundary line of said Lot 4 and the westerly prolongation thereof the following three (3) courses and distances: North 87028'39" West, 78.00 feet; North 59023'39" West, 474.00 feet; North 51'21'39" West, 214.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 17.274 acres, more or less. End of Description. g\�NGENs�pSG 11779 �b 1z / o Op TF p F YM M CC PN`� Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B 1/4 S.5 S.6 S.5 w Rescue n 6 Ranch Sub. -`n P 'o O : I coo `n o z S89'52'36"E 1192.35' S89'52'36"E 696.77' S6 . 33 S3"1g"£ • 2 83" N N S64 Syr o LO 00 7.e z o rn S LO 00 0) L- rD y N o M ±63.965 Acres m o � c� o O N +• o C1 3g2 U' cn o Y06• g 91' 00 V' coy 8 off'"� L3 Ns�367 4g" �, ro 6 0 4 Z Point of oc °' S2•� Beginning ILq NSgg�¢p Tamarack I Z� 2339" Ridge Sub. rn Lot 4, block 1 Line Table I o Laredo Estates Sub. Line Bearing Length I U) ; I L1 S31'36'40"E 154.12' S.6:S.5 _ _ _ _ _ _ L2 S48'18'53"E 155.34' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1/4•S.5 S.7 S.8 W. Columbia Rd. S.8 L3 S82'33'31"W 182.68' O L4 S57'24'55"W 143.12' NNL LAND S� \DENS c4 L5 S67'27'28"W 176.39' <c A L6 N87'28'39"W 78.00' a 1 779 ;a L7 N51'21'39"W 214.44' 0o F or- Curve Table YM MCCP►M� Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length N Scale: 1"=400' C1 314.02' 267.40' 67'17'03" S79'25'27"W 296.28' 0 100 200 400 800 P:\Summerlin Sub(Lansing Farms) 22-285\dwg\Annex Ex.dwg 6/12/2024 4:19:37 PM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. IDAHO Annexation 22-285 99E,EMERALD SURVEY Summerlin Subdivsion Sheet No. BOISISE,IDAHO 83704 704 I (208)846-8570 I �+ All of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted GROUP, LLC portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. FD7g. Date 62/2024 1/4 C1/4 S.5 S.6 S.5 w Rescue n Ranch Sub. � p ,.� 00 0 "oo `n O c z • v S89'52'36"E 1192.35' S895236E 696.77' ' " ' dz 16F 3 N N 00 u7 S64 34• o 4 N z 6 00 U) 0) N o � o ±46.691 Acres/ O' N C3 LO m � 46 0 o N N C2 L5 C1 N U J fn O N o -' L12 m p vi L13 L11 0� o Z S89'55'18"W 671.73' �9 L8 cGo <3 L14 C4 L10 �50 �o Point of � Beginning I Ip I Tamarack I Ridge Sub. rn cal to O ' Lot 4, Block 1 I Oo Laredo Estates Sub. 0 S.6 S.5 1/4 S.5 S.7 S.8 W. Columbia Rd. S.8 S�ONN` LAND See Sheet 2 for Line \GENS�O and Curve Tables 1 779 N NAG�Z �o Scale: 1"=400' ��O'9 F OF 0 100 200 400 800 YM MCCAN`� P:\Summerlin Sub (Lansing Farms) 22-285\dwg\R-15 Ex.dwg 6/12/2024 5:22:11 PM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. IDAHO R-15 Zone 22-285 SURVEY 0955W AHO83704MERALD Summerlin Subdivsion Sheet No. BO8)E4-8570 704 1 of 2 (208)846-8570 A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted GROUP, LLC portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Dwg. Date 6/12/2024 Line Table Line Bearing Length L1 S31'36'40"E 154.12' L2 S48'18'53"E 155.34' L3 N61'46'52"W 206.38' L4 I N00'00'59"E 293.70' L5 N89'59'01"W 261.29' L6 N66'56'01"W 170.73' L7 S45'46'56"W 378.17' LB N44'13'04"W 22.00' L9 S74'55'59"W 195.03' L10 S45'46'56"W 8.74' L11 N45'04'42"W 11.31' L12 S89'55'18"W 37.00' L13 S00'04'42"E 35.65' L14 S89'55'18"W 187.58' Curve Table Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 49.17' 50.00' 56'20'46" S61'50'35"W 47.21' C2 120.69' 300.00' 23'03'00" N78'27'31"W 119.88' C3 554.28' 472.00' 67*17'03" S79'25'27"W 522.98' C4 20.44' 1 100.00' 11'42'50" S05'56'07"E 20.41' \ONp,I. LAND g5 v AGE N G 11779 (OP (��Zr�2` o O� FOF �� 0? YM MCC PN`� P:\Summerlin Sub (Lansing Forms) 22-285\dwg\R-15 Ex.dwg 6/12/2024 6:01:11 PM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. IDAHO R-15 Zone 22-285 SURVEY 9955E MERALD ST AHO83704 BOISE IDAHO 83704 Summerlin Subdivsion Sheet No. , (208)846-8570 A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted 2 of GROUP, LLC portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Dwg. Date 6/12/2024 1/4 C1/4 S.5 S.6 S.5 Rescue Ranch Sub. I c • v I U� I � (O N (O • I N I U) I Lo v LO Qf C2 o N o 49 C4 c� C3 L10 M u I �� C5 362.9 v0 -j I L3L4 6 N6g SS 'l w 3 m 00 cn L2 N89 55'18"E 671.73' �' oco\ 1 L1 <7? Z L7 c G Coro L1 C1 L5 /o�yo 119.63' / Q' hP ±17.274 Acres t.1b : I Ns9•�¢OQ. Tamarack tk Ridge Sub. M L16 05 . rri r` 00 Lot 41 Block > Laredo Estates Sub. ; I ; I S.6 S.5 1/4 S.S S.7 S.8 W. Columbia Rd. S.8 OVAL LA/y� See Sheet 2 for Line �5 \01 and Curve Tables 1 779 N 0(P IZ/;z.>z 0 Scale: 1"=400' 01 F OF O� 0 100 200 400 800 Y MMCCPN`� P:\Summerlin Sub(Lansing Farms) 22-285\dwg\R-8 Ex.dwg 6/12/2024 5:39:00 PM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. IDAHO R-8 Zone 22-285 SURVEY 9955W EMERALDAHO83704 BOISE,IDAHO 83704 Summerlin Subdivsion Sheet No. (208)846-8570 1 of 2 A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted GROUP, LLC portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Date Lim 6/1212/2024 Line Table Line Bearing Length L1 N89'55'18"E 187.58' L2 N00'04'42"W 35.65' L3 N89'55'18"E 37.00' L4 S45'04'42"E 11.31' L5 N45'46'56"E 8.74' L6 N74'55'59"E 195.03' L7 S44'13'04"E 22.00' L8 N45'46'56"E 378.17' L9 S66'56'01"E 170.73' L10 S89'59'01"E 261.29' L11 S00'00'59"W 293.70' L12 N61'46'52"W 155.06' L13 S82'33'31"W 182.68' L14 S57'24'55"W 143.12' L15 S67'27'28"W 176.39' L16 N87'28'39"W 78.00' L17 N51'21'39"W 214.44' Curve Table Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length C1 20.44' 100.00' 11'42'50" N05'56'07"W 20.41' C2 554.28' 472.00' 67*17'03" N79'25'27"E 522.98' C3 120.69' 300.00' 23'03'00" S78'27'31"E 119.88' C4 49.17' 50.00' 56'20'46" N61'50'35"E 47.21' C5 314.02' 267.40' 67*17'03" S79'25'27"W 296.28' �\ONAL LANo \GENS �L 1 779 O� F OF YM MCC PN`� P:\Summerlin Sub (Lansing Farms) 22-285\dwg\R-8 Ex.dwg 6/12/2024 5:54:51 PM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. IDAHO R-8 Zone 22-285 SURVEY 9955W AHO8LD 3704 Summerlin Subdivsion Sheets No. BOISE,IDAHO 83704 � o l ^ (208)846-8570 L A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted GROUP, LLC portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Dwg• Date s/12/2024