Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-06-03 Work Session CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, June 03, 2025 at 4:30 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the May 13, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 2. Approve Minutes of the May 20, 2025 City Council Work Session 3. Approve Minutes of the May 20, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 4. Elevate Self Storage Full Release of Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2024-0029) 5. Millwood Subdivision Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025-0040) 6. Life Church Partial Release of Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0051) 7. Elevate Franklin Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2025-0052) 8. Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 5 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT- 2025-0054) 9. Order of Denial for Chick-Fil-A (CR-2025-0001) by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., located at 2012 N Eagle. Rd. 10. Final Order for McKay Farm Subdivision, by Todd Tucker, Boise Hunter Homes, located at 5875 S. Eagle Rd. 11. Development Agreement (Summerlin West Subdivision H-2024-0023) Between City of Meridian and Lansing Farms LLC and Open Door Rentals LLC for Property Generally Located on the East Side of S. Locust Grove Rd. Between E. Lake Hazel Rd. and E. Columbia Rd. 12. Addendum to Development Agreement (Jump Time H-2025-0011) Between City of Meridian and Babcock LLC for Property Located at 2805 E. Franklin Rd. 13. School Resource Office (SRO) Agreement between City of Meridian and West Ada School District (WASD) for the 2025-2026 School Year 14. License Agreement between the City of Meridian and Northwest Pipeline, LLC for temporary use of working space 15. Request From Dara Tong for Connection to the City Water and Sewer Systems Outside City Limits at 485 E Overland Road 16. Resolution No. 25-2519: Accepting Student Artwork for Traffic Box Art Wraps 17. City of Meridian Financial Report - April 2025 ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS \[Action Item\] 18. State Highway 69, Kuna to Meridian Corridor Traffic Study 19. Legal Department Discussion: Request from Ada County and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District to Enter into Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements Concerning Capital Improvements Plans 20. Fire Department Deployment Analysis Presentation 21. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the Amount of $80,020 for consulting services for new Department of Justice ADA Web Content Accessibility Rule Continued to the June 3, 2025 Regular Meeting ADJOURNMENT 5:48 PM Meridian City Council Work Session June 3, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 4.30 p.m. Tuesday, June 3, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Tina Lomeli, Bill Nary, Kurt Starman, Charlie Butterfield, Shawn Harper, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE _X_ Liz Strader _X_ Brian Whitlock _X_Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call the meeting to order. For the record it is June 3rd, 2025, at 4.30 p.m. We will begin this afternoon's work session with roll call attendance. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Next item up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Don't see any needed changes, so I move that we adopt the agenda as presented. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the May 13, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 2. Approve Minutes of the May 20, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 2 of 26 3. Approve Minutes of the May 20, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 4. Elevate Self Storage Full Release of Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2024-0029) 5. Millwood Subdivision Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025- 0040) 6. Life Church Partial Release of Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025- 0051) 7. Elevate Franklin Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2025-0052) 8. Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 5 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0054) 9. Order of Denial for Chick-Fil-A (CR-2025-0001) by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., located at 2012 N Eagle. Rd. 10. Final Order for McKay Farm Subdivision, by Todd Tucker, Boise Hunter Homes, located at 5875 S. Eagle Rd. 11. Development Agreement (Summerlin West Subdivision H-2024-0023) Between City of Meridian and Lansing Farms LLC and Open Door Rentals LLC for Property Generally Located on the East Side of S. Locust Grove Rd. Between E. Lake Hazel Rd. and E. Columbia Rd. 12. Addendum to Development Agreement (Jump Time H-2025-0011) Between City of Meridian and Babcock LLC for Property Located at 2805 E. Franklin Rd. 13. School Resource Office (SRO) Agreement between City of Meridian and West Ada School District (WASD) for the 2025-2026 School Year 14. License Agreement between the City of Meridian and Northwest Pipeline, LLC for temporary use of working space 15. Request From Dara Tong for Connection to the City Water and Sewer Systems Outside City Limits at 485 E Overland Road 16. Resolution No. 25-2519: Accepting Student Artwork for Traffic Box Art Wraps 17. City of Meridian Financial Report -April 2025 Simison: Next up is the Consent Agenda. Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 3 of 26 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda. For the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. DEPARTMENT / COMMISSION REPORTS [Action Item] 18. State Highway 69, Kuna to Meridian Corridor Traffic Study Simison: So, I will move on to the Department/Commission reports. First item up is Item 18, State Highway 69, Kuna to Meridian Corridor Traffic Study. Good evening. If you will state your name for the record. Wasdahl: Mark Wasdahl. Idaho Transportation Department, District Three. Kelsey: Leah Kelsey. DKS Associates. Simison: Good evening. Wasdahl: Mayor and Members of the Council, thank you for inviting us for a quick briefing on our Highway 69 Corridor Traffic Study. Background and purpose. State Highway 69 was widened from Amity north to Overland in the early 1990s from two to four lanes. Early 2000s from Kuna up to Amity. Current four lane facility. With the growth that the region has been experiencing we have done a traffic study to see what our next future iteration of Meridian Road will look like. We wanted to have a vision of keeping traffic moving, safe and efficient access on and off the corridor with all that additional traffic and safe facilities and crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians. We will skip through a lot of the process here, but we had started before this time we had an open house virtual and we covered a number of concepts that were considered nontraditional through U's -- example of that is at Veterans Memorial Parkway and State Street where you pass through the signal light, make a U-turn and go back. We looked at the continuous flow intersections. After COVID hit we took a quick little bit long break Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 4 of 26 and we had another ITD project on Karcher Road which is a two lane rural highway in Canyon county and was looking to widen it and they had a number of features that we had looked at early on. Our executive at headquarters entered into a discussion internally on whether we want to -- wanted to do nontraditional intersections with some increase in efficiency in handling traffic or whether we should keep driver expectancy and keep traditional intersections. In the end the decision was to keep driver expectancy and to retain traditional intersections only. With that we reset our project. We came up with three different scenarios for access, which we will cover later and we talked to our executive team, who gave us a recommended to go forward at full potential access at the half mile in align with IDAPA. So, we had an online open house April 7th through 21 st. We are finishing up the draft of the traffic study. We are meeting with the cities, county, Ada County Highway District and we hope to have the traffic study finalized in July. Kelsey: A little bit about the existing traffic out there and the future traffic, kind of breaking the corridor up into two sections, the north-south section, the Meridian Road section and the short little section in Kuna called the Avalon Road section. The north section towards the northern part of the corridor, which is the busiest part of the corridor, the traffic is expected to more than double between now and 2050. That's our kind of horizon design year. That's going to set us at levels that are higher than Eagle Road today, to kind of put it in perspective. The section -- east-west section along Avalon, that's actually expected to drop a little bit. That's due to the reconfiguration of the Kuna and Meridian intersection to extend that -- or I guess configure it to a four leg intersection and extend Meridian Road south. That's a project or study that we will -- we will touch on a little bit later in the presentation, too. So, with all that traffic what are the impacts. On the eight mile stretch of road currently today going northbound in the a.m., which is the dominant direction in p.m. -- or southbound in the p.m. It takes about 13 to 14 minutes during that rush time. If we do nothing by 2050 the -- the p.m. commute suffers a little bit. We are looking at about a three minute increase, but the a.m. dominant direction in the northbound is expected to exceed about 42 minutes. So, there is a real need to do some improvements, increase some capacity. If we do do our improvements with the proposed vision that we will get to here in a second, we are expected to bring those travel times back down to existing. A little bit about the crashes out there. The most recent five year period there was about 580 crashes on the segment. When you look at just intersection crashes only there is a little bit more than 500. Five fatal crashes, three kind of towards the northern end of the corridor, one near Columbia and Hubbard and one at the Kuna curve. Just incidentally three of those were drug and alcohol related. So, 47 percent of the crashes on this corridor are serious and injury crashes, which is a higher percentage than what you see on -- statewide. You see about 31 percent for all roadways in Idaho. So, there is a bit of a concern. This is flagged in ITD's safety corridor analysis as a segment of roadway that has higher than average crash -- crashes on similar facilities. So, with the traffic and safety in mind we came up with a proposed vision to accommodate the new traffic or the increased traffic to widen from five to seven lanes in that north-south section. Install a continuous raised median, which will help with safety and also improve mobility. So, therefore, the access onto the highway will only be allowed at the one mile Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 5 of 26 intersections, like Victory, Amity and Lake Hazel and, then, the half mile intersections. Outside of the right of way there would be a buffered ten foot multi-use pathway on both sides and, then, wherever there is an access point or an intersection we would have right turn lanes for safety. The cross-section would look similar to this where we would have a 30 to 50 foot buffer on either side of the roadway where the multi-use pathway would be included and not be outside of the -- ITD's right of way. Within the right of way there would be an eight foot buffer that includes the curb and gutter, eight foot shoulder, three 12 foot travel lanes, which is a standard travel lane width and, then, an 18 foot raised median and drainage would be accommodated with most likely roadside swales. That would be something that we would identify more closely during design. The east- west section between Kay and Orchard we would have more of an urban section. It's a -- oh, I'm sorry, I skipped a little too far ahead. The east-west section would be widened to five continuous lanes. Currently there is a little bit of four lane and two lane section. There would be seven foot attached sidewalks, which would transition into that ten foot multi-use pathway as you move east and, again, right turn lanes at all intersections and access points for safety. So, the cross-section in the Kuna to Kay Avenue section, which is the east section, would look really similar to the north-south Meridian Road section. The only differences is is the center lane, instead of being an 18 foot raised median, there would be a two way left turn lane to allow for access. Then on the short segment that's further west there would be more of an urban section with attached sidewalks. There wouldn't be a shoulder and, again, with that 14 foot two way left turn lane. Just a couple notes about the roadway features. So, that 18 foot raised median kind of looked at a different -- a bunch of different widths and modeled it with our turn analysis and landed on that, because that allows for U-turns at the half mile and mile signals for a large passenger vehicle. An F350. You could probably get a bit bigger vehicle in there, but our modeling is showing that we could accommodate like a three -- F350 truck. The ped -- ped and bike facilities, again, we are -- we have either seven foot attached sidewalks or those ten foot buffered detached multi-use pathways on both sides throughout the entire corridor and, then, to cross State Highway 69 there would be single stage pedestrian crossings at the mile intersections or the half mile intersections if -- if and when those are signalized. Couple of special considerations, more towards the northern part of the corridor in Meridian. We have some constrained right of way and some steep slopes and so it becomes a little bit of a challenge to add in multi-use pathways. Some preliminary concepts would be to maybe have some -- an elevated pathway, which would provide some protection with a barrier and along those steep slope sections instead of taking more right of way there might be some retaining walls. So, we would kind of have maybe a tiered roadway. Now I will hand it over to Mark. Wasdahl: City of Kuna has looked at extending Meridian Road. They had their own study. It ended up producing a one mile cross-section to cross the rail main line and the Indian Creek. As part of that we put back in road the Kuna curve, which went in in the 1980s and put in a standard four way intersection, which if you go back to 1931 our first plan set that's what was there in the first place. So, it's back to the future on that one. We also -- ITD, with the help of COMPASS, put in a grant -- a raise grant -- no build grant in January. They are supposed to announce in this month the winners and losers and we put in for a Pell study to look at alignments and what you can do with extending Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 6 of 26 Highway 69 and also what to do with Kuna-Mora, because on its current alignment I think that's five crossings of the New York Canal and something you don't want to do. So, we are looking forward to seeing if we do get that grant awarded. Originally we had studied the Overland Road intersection. We had determined that a high capacity intersection was necessary. The one that we looked at was a half continuous flow intersection, which would have been on the Overland Road side. ACHD at that time said that they were not in agreement to construct CFIs. Now, years later ITD is not going to construct CFIs. So, we took that out and decided that needed to be a separate project. We have done those before with ACHD. I was involved with one pre-COVID on Glenwood and State Street intersection and that's what we are recommending that it's standalone. If no one is doing at grade improvements that leaves you with vertical and vertical is a lot more expensive than horizontal improvements. So, you really have to get a full buy in from agencies when you are going to that price point. Kelsey: So, when we rescoped this project in '23, '24 we initially did extensive modeling with three other -- or two other alternatives, which varied the access at the half mile. So, the proposed vision again has full access. Potential signals at the half mile. We also looked at those intersections being restricted to right-in, right-out, left-in. Those lefts could potentially be signalized or just right-in, right-out. So, you would only have full access at the mile. Unlike our previous modeling efforts with -- like the median, U- turn and CFI corridors and even in an expressway, we didn't have a clear winner or loser. All options operated very similarly within a minute of each other when we look at the travel times and there was a bit of a benefit to signalizing the half mile and having full access, because that takes some of the demand off of the major streets, like Victory, Lake Hazel, Deer Flat that are running, yeah, pretty heavy traffic. So, yeah, they were all very similar, but there was a little bit of a benefit having half mile signals. Wasdahl: Finally, we had our public involvement April 7th through 21 st. It was an online meeting. Nineteen hundred people attended. One hundred thirty-five comment forms were submitted through the website. Additional 18 people gave comments via e- mail or call -- phone call. Reaction. Roughly 55 percent expressed support. Twenty- nine percent did not express support. Sixteen percent were neutral. We have some more details on comments on the next slide or two. Support likes for noncontroversy, all comments regarding converting the Kuna curve into a standard intersection were positive. Widening -- increasing capacity of Highway 69, that was about 86 to 14 percent positive. The negatives were either people who said put transit in instead of the additional lane. You can't build your way out of congestion or you are letting more congestion come down by increasing the lane count. Buffered multi-use pathway. That was like 20 out of -- 28 out of 34 were positive. The ones who weren't had an image of like a five year old on a bicycle -- this is almost a direct quote -- you know, on the edge of a 55 mile an hour roadway. Raised median. There was a general feel of the comments that they -- safety was very important. However, raised medians also cut off access that exists right now to parcels. Left-ins. Left-outs. And so you had this push- pull of opposition due to loss of access versus some people saying we need to have less access or we need more safety. We also had one emergency response comment about accessibility of crossing over a raised median. We had said right turn lanes and Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 7 of 26 that was universally approved. They liked the overall safety improvement. Concerns -- there was no argument that there was a dislike for not having an improvement of Overland Road and/or an additional lane onto the 1-84 interchange. So, that's a -- the push for that, that's a safe and universal request. I think we put a link to the 1-84 auxiliary lane project in, which we will put a second northbound lane onto eastbound I- 84, but, again, the Overland Road we need to work on that as a separate project. We added a -- the signals at half mile intersection were pretty heavily disliked, though not necessarily half mile intersections. We had a fairly good group who wanted an expressway to be considered. We had looked at it early on and in terms of cost and it had a low cost benefit ratio. Not that it wouldn't have got traffic quicker to Overland, but when you have a full -- a continuous flow facility terminating in volume with a non- continuous flow facility, like Overland Road, you really have to build a system interchange such as what we are doing at State Highway 16 extension onto 1-84 now. We had also comments on acceleration-deceleration lanes. The problem with those is that at the speed we have that those would blend and, essentially, be another lane. You can do deceleration, but you can't do both. They just don't fit. And, again, the raised median will limit access and we had negative comments there. Finally other comments. We did have a group that said for us to ignore the naysayers and reconsider CFIs, through U's and roundabouts. We were sort of surprised that that actually -- I don't think it was double digit, but it was a fairly substantial comment. Concern about increased noise and requesting for mitigation to be like sound walls. There is the access issue at Calderwood Drive, which I think would also be looked at as part of an Overland Road intersection study, because it should be within the traffic impact area of the intersection or the operating environment of it. There was a lament over the loss of a rural environment and a rural community through the development ongoing. And speed limit changes. Those end up -- some say slow them down. Others say better not slow us down. That's really 50-50, 55-45, regardless of where you are in projects. So, we intend, as I said, to complete the traffic study. Our current funding document, we have a new one going to our board in a few weeks. I haven't seen it, so I don't know whether IT board approved staff to pursue a STAR sales tax anticipate revenue agreement with Brighton Development, who has a large parcel on the southeast corner of Meridian and Lake Hazel. It was expected by June 2025 we would have a key number within our document for it. Because they are still -- Brighton is still doing design work they need to have more certainty on costing before they can fill a final agreement. So, we thought of first June that could go to July as they go through preliminary -- through final design and get more accurate costing. We stand ready for questions, Mayor and Members of the Council. Simison: Thank you. Council, questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Appreciate you both being here and maybe you can help at least Council with some action from us. Got a full agenda this afternoon. Came. Providing the Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 8 of 26 presentation. What is it you are looking for from the Council as a result of your presentation? Wasdahl: It's more of an information and feedback. We weren't requesting approval- disapproval, but we wanted to keep you informed. We have got other projects in the area and we wanted to -- since this one would be on closing out that we wanted you to have a chance to hear it before it went to close out. Cavener: Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I have a handful of questions. One of them -- I guess just maybe to take a step backward. Talk to me about your decision to exclude the 1-84 to Overland segment from this study. Like -- like why was that decision made? It's surprising to me, just because like I view that as one of the biggest problems that we have in seeing that excluded -- that segment excluded kind of leaves me feeling frustrated at least and I would love to explore that decision. How does that impact your study's relevance? And like what assumptions were made about fixing issues in that excluded segment and what kind of commitments do we have to fixing the problems in that segment is what I would like to talk about. Wasdahl: Yeah. Originally we had come up with a horizontal solution that was not in the -- I guess in the design book for ACHD and projects with mutual intersections. It's important that we are both on the same page, because nothing gets done otherwise. We knew going to a vertical solution was -- in terms of study a big increase in cost, which we were not internally looking to put onto this project. As I said also that we -- like in 2018 1 think we did a mutual study on State and Glenwood and really for us to get full buy-in by both agencies, both have to be at the table specifically on this -- a project like this. This was the only controversial part really in terms of trying to come to a design decision and so we passed it on to saying that it would work better as a mutual project. Typically we count lanes going into the intersections and we split the cost based upon that and it was just really too big of a project for what we were doing in our piece of it. It became -- and that's why we just said it needed to go to a different process than the one that we were running. Strader: So, I guess -- Mr. Mayor -- Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: -- if you don't mind I would love to hear, then, like what is the thinking or the plan around addressing that? Because you guys could improve this whole corridor -- sure, that would be fantastic, but if everyone gets to 1-84 and it's a giant disaster I'm having a hard time seeing how that's going to move the needle for people., So help me Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 9 of 26 understand what the plans are or the thinking. If there is any to date on how and when that excluded segment would be addressed. Wasdahl: Really that's a discussion. We -- ITD and ACHD meets twice a year and that's something that at that management level they need to come together. I'm sure they have -- they have heard from the city that that's very important to the city and it comes down to management -- Strader: Got it. Wasdahl: -- only the trigger on moving forward with something like that. Simison: I could just piggyback on it. You know, they have talked about the vertical in the past, but I think the question that I would have is to the point how relevant is this, because, you know, how much of this decision framework is based upon the mile between Frank -- or Victory onto the interstate as it compares to what the final treatment for that is? You know, how do you interlay that into the value benefit -- if you were to have a flyover coming off of I-84 over the ramp and lands on the other side of Overland, how does that play into the long term of this portion of the -- of the corridor study? Does it -- was that taken into consideration that you would have continuous track movement off of the interstate onto the segment, especially going southbound. Maybe not northbound, unless that -- I don't know how that one works, but I'm just kind of curious, because that's I think part of the question is the relevance to the work when you have a big segment that's going to be impacted. Kelsey: Yeah. The traffic modeling that we worked with COMPASS, the MPO, they -- they generated the traffic demand, what wants to be driving on the corridor in 2050 and the -- when we originally did our modeling we -- we had a solution at -- at Overland that allowed the traffic to get through down to Kuna and, then, up to the interstate. And, then, you know, when we had to pivot we -- we continued to assume that there was a high capacity solution there, so we could right size the remainder of the corridor, so the -- the demand would -- would still be the same if we had a flyover versus a CFI versus some other high volume intersection. So, we feel pretty confident that the proposed vision to the south will be adequate no matter what the solution is at 1-84 and Overland Road. Wasdahl: We also have a separate project, our 1-84 mobility study that kicked off in January and we are looking at adjacent intersections next to the interchanges, which includes Overland and we are anticipating coming out with guidance from that study. Simison: So, when I say you don't feel this is wasted work, because the end result -- whatever is done it won't impact the results of this section generally, because COMPASS says this is what it will be, irregardless of how quickly you get them from the interstate onto this -- south of Overland. Kelsey: Correct. Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 10 of 26 Simison: Okay. Sorry. If there were more questions I -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Thank you. If you don't mind I just have a couple more. That was helpful. I guess -- I think you kind of touched on this in your presentation, but I had to step out for a minute. When you were doing your modeling did you model like Kuna's expansion of Meridian Road south and unplanned developments that are likely coming, you know from that build out of their impact area? How did you account for that? Kelsey: So, the COMPASS model did include in our roadway network that extension to the south. As far as the potential development in that area, we -- we didn't add any additional demographics than what is approved in the CIM. So, there may or may not be -- I guess some of the demographics included further to the south, but there is an additional study that is coming that will be looking at a couple of different land use models when that extension is added and Kuna-Mora is widened all the way to the interstate. Strader: I just have two more. One of them is just funding sources generally. It sounded like there is no funding for this so far. I would love to just hear more about what -- besides STAR funds, what funding sources have been identified and, then, you know, obviously, multi-use pathways are important to City of Meridian. I think we have said that over and over a hundred different ways. Just want to check. Are you all envisioning taking on the cost of the multi-use pathways along this segment. I mean there are some of these constrained segments that you talked about special treatment, whether it's retaining walls, whether it's some tiered approach. I mean is that all expected to be incorporated together? Because I think what we wouldn't want to see is like a kind of a halfway effort, you know, where it's like we end up with widening, but not the pedestrian facilities that are needed to support a healthy functioning community. Wasdahl: On the Chinden widening we have constructed pathways all on the south side only, because we intend to widen to the north and, then, put them in at that point., So we have been consistent recently of putting in pathways with widening projects. Strader: Okay. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I will provide a compliment that I do live in north Meridian and I think you have done a very nice job with your multi-use pathways to the south on that segment. So, thank you for that. Okay. That was it for my questions. But if you could touch on -- I think funding sources and a little more on -- on the pathways, if there is anything we need to note. I think at some point we may come back to you with more formal feedback, you know, once we have a chance to digest all this, so -- Wasdahl: One part of the STAR project that's a maximum of 35 million, but I think that they are aiming at 30 million due to potential cost overruns and pricing variability, is we are looking to see what gets built out of STARS before we jump into our own design. Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 11 of 26 Next week I believe we are supposed to have a preliminary design meeting, so that will give us some better idea of what they think they can build. How far. And, then, our development services group is actually taking a lead on this. Just to note. We have not been told by Brighton who their tenant or tenants plural are going to be. So, just that they will meet the definition of the legislation to be eligible for STAR. But I think once we know what they are going to build, then, I think that puts us into a better position to know what we need to finish up to. Strader: That's it for me, Mayor. Simison: Council, additional questions? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: So, I had the opportunity a month ago at COMPASS to speak with someone from ITD. I explained to him at that time that the description I got from someone from ACHD was when we are dealing with Overland and 1-84, the best word he ever used was it's broken and I sympathize with that, looking at the numbers, because they do exceed Eagle Road and we constantly are talking about State Highway 55 and sometimes I don't think we talk about Highway 69 enough. Today at our COMPASS meeting I met with a member of Kuna city council and when I asked him about all this work that was being done he kind of had the same frustration as me. We are hearing from you tonight, but we don't hear from you enough. We don't have enough input opportunities as a city to understand what it is you are looking at doing and I'm not trying to speak for the city of Kuna, but they are out there at the 54th fastest growing city in the country right now, while we are still growing to the south and I have seen Mayor Joe Stears' project of taking Highway 69 further south. I think the numbers we are going to have coming in from the south -- or coming in from the south coming north are going to be very high and I get real worried, much like what Council Woman Strader said, I think you can widen this road all day long, but if we don't fix Overland at 1-84 all we are going to do is create a much larger bottleneck and a longer wait and we need to come up with a plan, some sort of a phasing plan that includes all of it that you prioritize which part of the project is most important first and I hate to say it, but I think Overland- 1-84 is the most important part, because that's your pressure release valve for the traffic. Because if you build the road wider first we are just going to stack them up as they get into Overland and get into 1-84 and when I spoke to -- and I'm not going to call him out here, because he is not here. When I spoke to ITD at the COMPASS meeting he agreed. The problem is if -- if the reason we are not having this conversation is because this is too expensive, then, we are not doing our job. If this is ultimately a very expensive solution, then, we still need to have that conversation and we still need to see what our solutions are to move forward, even if they have a lot of zeros behind them and we are not sure where all that funding is coming from, because as far as I can tell in our entire community right now and the entire community of Kuna, this is the number one traffic spot that they have a problem with and when you sit there and you mention Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 12 of 26 COMPASS, the whole idea of COMPASS is to come up with a regional solution to traffic problems and I would really like to see both the city of Kuna and the City of Meridian much more involved as we go through this, so we understand what you are looking at and we don't just have these talks every once in a while where we get to ask a bunch of questions. I personally would like to be a lot more involved with this process as it goes forward and I'm sure several other members of our council would as well. Simison: Council, additional questions or comments? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Here here to Council Member Overton. I recognize you guys are working with the direction you have been given, but this is going to create a very large problem that is already in a challenging spot and, again, not the smartest guy in the room when it comes to traffic engineering and moving cars, but I know what I see over there as a resident in that area right now and as Kuna continues to grow it is a problem that will continue to get worse. So, it's hard to be excited about this when you see it as causing a major problem down the way. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor. Thank you so much for being here. I was going to comment, but I think that Councilman Overton covered that very well. I also am from that area and I love seeing the possibility of improvements on that road, but to move more cars into a major bottleneck seems to have the cart before the horse. But my main question, since he covered that so well, was I was wondering if I could get a little more information on the continuous raised median, because I live so close to that area I see when the road's blocked, especially it hasn't been that long since we had a fatal accident and our closest fire station to that area is on Overland slightly west of Meridian Road and so it seems like it's still efficient getting to those that are southbound, but those that are northbound if fire engines need to get over a raised median, how does that work? Kelsey: My understanding is that the -- and I'm not a geometric design engineer, but the -- you know, the curb would be a higher speed curb, which is a little bit more sloped and it's mountable, so it's not ideal to -- to drive over it I understand, but it is -- it is traversable. And, then, there will be, you know, U-turn opportunities at the half mile and mile. So, yeah, if it isn't too far out of the way to just kind of take a right and, then, take a U-turn. Wasdahl: For the Karcher Road project I was involved in the environmental, but not the final design of it. We had a meeting with the fire department. It was one of the volunteer fire department. I can't remember the name. And they brought up issues with Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 13 of 26 a raised median, but what they wanted to know is if they could drive on it, so that you would have mountable, dismountable curbs and the direction of it. So, one of their issues there, Karcher Road being two lanes at this time, is if there is a crash you just can't get to the site. So, theirs wasn't so much crossing over, it was operating on top of it and I can't say how that turned out, but -- in terms of design, but that's probably something I need to look into. Little Roberts: Thank you. Simison: Okay. Thank you very much. I know that you are balancing -- you are doing what you are asked to do and balancing multiple things and maybe even some things that haven't been said. I -- I know there is concern if we dump all the traffic too much on to 1-84 it's going to have a big problem as well. So, whether it's an Overland Road problem or onto the interstate problem, there will be a problem one way or the other right now with what the projected numbers are if we don't have a bigger conversation about a lot more things than this, but we understand your roles in this process. So, thank you very much. Wasdahl: You're welcome, Mayor and Council. Kelsey: Thank you. 19. Legal Department Discussion: Request from Ada County and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District to Enter into Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements Concerning Capital Improvements Plans Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to Item 19, which is a legal department discussion request regarding the Ada County Emergency EMS District to enter Intergovernment and Joint Powers agreements concerning CIPs. Mr. Starman. Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. This is a follow-up item to discussion you had back in December of last year relative to a request from the county to consider, along with the other cities -- incorporated cities in Ada county a countywide impact fee program. I know you received a pretty thorough presentation about that back in December and I also recognize time is limited tonight, so I'm going to keep my comments very brief, but I'm happy to answer questions you have and also let me mention now that we have representatives from the county available on Zoom if you have questions of them. Leon Letson, as well as the consultant for the county. So, we have some resources here, although not physically present, available by Zoom. I will just start by saying as a recap from your discussion in December, the county is interested in doing countywide impact fees that requires the cooperation of all the incorporated cities in Ada county, including Meridian, and so we talked about that time if Meridian chooses to participate a potential implementation plan to accomplish that would be sort of a multi-phase, multi-part process with part one being a limited intergovernmental agreement between the city and Ada county that would essentially Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 14 of 26 say this: That the city would agree to consider the county's capital improvement plans that are related to the facilities in question, but the agreement -- we would make it clear that the city is not agreeing to adopt or to implement those CIPs, nor is the city agreeing to adopt an ordinance to implement the fees. We are simply agreeing that -- to provide a structure to consider the capital improvement plans. We would, then, come back as step two to look at the CIPs and, then, later, if the other cities come on board at the end of that process, we would actually talk about the possibility of adopting an ordinance to assist the county with its countywide program. Again, making it clear the city is not committing today to do any of those things, simply just to consider those items. So, that's really what's before you. In December you had a draft agreement as an attachment. The agreements before you this evening are essentially identical, you know a couple changes here and there, but they are substantially similar to what you saw before. So, the county has approved those. The question for the City Council this evening is that if those agreements are satisfactory to the City Council or you may need some additional questions answered tonight or maybe on a going forward basis, but we are not asking you take action tonight, we are simply just touching base one more time before we place this on a future agenda for action. So, we are looking for your feedback tonight. If the City Council is amenable to proceeding, the next action step would be to have something on your agenda likely in two weeks for formal approval. That, as I -- just to reiterate, that would just simply commit the city to consider the possibility of adopting the CIPs. It does not lock us into approving those CIPs. As I mentioned we have representatives from the county online. They can answer questions as well. I just want to touch on two topics from December and, then, I'm going to step back and answer questions in the interest of time. There was some discussion back in December about -- or an observation made that the county has the ability to implement at least impact fees for the sheriff's office without city participation and so I just wanted to report to you my understanding is -- and we could have the county representatives clarify, but my understanding is the county has adopted an ordinance to implement that fee for the sheriffs office. I'm not sure if they are collecting the fee yet or not, but my understanding is that they have adopted an ordinance and so as a sign of good faith. The other topic we talked about at that time was the issue of -- we had this -- thought Council Member Strader described this really well. I'm paraphrasing, but this is a clunky process. I like that quote. And -- and we talked about is there a way to make this -- streamline this with the legislature and so there was a discussion about is there a way that we can make this more like ACHD or at a minimum clarify, for example, the coroner's office being eligible for impact fees. My understanding is that -- I think -- or two thoughts there. One is that with respect to having an ACHD like model that would require a constitutional amendment. You heard that in December. We are in agreement with that. I think the county just decided that was -- could be too much of a heavy lift and they -- to my understanding they did not pursue that idea. In a similar manner with regard to clarifying the issue of the coroner's office, we talked last time that the statute allows for public facilities -- public safety facilities, which includes things like jails, but that language doesn't -- does not explicitly mention the coroner. As we talked about would it make sense for the county to get clarification from the legislature and I think for -- for their own reasons I don't want to -- I don't want to speak for the county. They just chose not to pursue that either at this time. It's possible they could do that in the future, Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 15 of 26 but that -- really that sort of stands where it was back in December. So, that's a lot of information, but I know you have seen this before and I also recognize we are short on time tonight, so I'm going to pause there. Happy to answer questions and, then, as I mentioned, we have representatives from the county here as well. Simison: Thank you, Kurt. Appreciate that. And just for the record, Council, if and when you ever do consider this I will make the request that you do not adopt a coroner impact fee, because of that issue not being clarified and even though they are -- they have chosen to try to indemnify us all they can, I still don't think the risk is worth the reward in this case based upon the building that currently exists in its current form. But with that, Council, any questions for Kurt? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Kurt, either if you know the answer now or if not maybe in a couple weeks come back. Have any cities signed such an agreement to date? And, if so, who? Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council and Council President Cavener. I'm -- to the best of my knowledge no -- no city has officially adopted the CIPs, nor have they entered into intergovernmental agreements. My understanding is the county has had substantive discussions with many of the cities. I think in some cases more than others, but I don't believe that the county has binding agreements or actions from any of the cities at this point. To the best my knowledge. And I would invite my colleagues from the county to -- to chime in that they know differently that. I just -- so, they know how that works. If they are -- I know they are online. But you just raise your hand function and the clerk will -- Simison: Leon is raising his hand to answer the question. I thought that there was some that have actually adopted. Mr. Letson. Letson: Can you hear me, Council Members? Sorry. Simison: Yes. Yes, we can. You are good. Letson: Oh. Okay. Great. Yeah. Just an update to what Kurt was sharing. So, the city of Eagle and the city of Star have adopted the CIPs into their comprehensive plans at this point. So, in essence, making it through phase one of the process that we have identified. Kuna and Garden City have requested a similar agreement to what Meridian has asked for. So, we have drafted similar agreements for those jurisdictions and they are reviewing those and considering similar to what you are doing tonight, entering into that agreement to, then, move on to that CIP step and ultimately, hopefully, the ordinance adoption and, then, city of Boise -- our COO Steve Rutherford's in conversation with their chief of staff and Mayor on progress there. So, I don't have much of an update with the city of Boise. But just want to let you know that we have Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 16 of 26 gained some ground on the effort. Also will confirm we have adopted a fee to collect impact fees -- or adopted ordinance to collect fees for the sheriff and we are actively collecting that now on every building permit issued in unincorporated Ada county and, yeah, that's -- that's the update I have for you right now. I'm happy to answer any questions. Simison: Thank you. Any additional questions for Leon? Appreciate it very much. Starman: Thank you. Simison: Okay. All right. So, next steps, Kurt. Starman: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. So, really, the thought was that if the Council was in general agreement with the agreements as they exist we place them on a future agenda, perhaps on the Consent Agenda for action. If we require some additional discussion relative to the coroner's office we can follow a similar plan, but perhaps have it on a work session item again for that particular item and, then, ask for, you know, adoption at that time. I guess I would take direction from the City Council and from the Mayor. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I think I would appreciate at least a short discussion on the coroner's office and I think that would be helpful and be informative and I understand kind of the reasons behind it, but I think that would be helpful and, two, if I just might make a comment, too. I like the idea of agreeing to a structure, not agreeing to necessarily the CIP plans. I think that gives us some leeway and some moving ahead, but showing good faith to the county that we are working towards that, while still trying to understand where the rest of the municipalities in the county are with regards to that. Understand Star and Eagle have moved forward, but where Boise is right now and others that would be -- would be helpful. So, that would be my -- my feedback, Kurt. Thank you. Starman: Thank you, Council Member. 20. Fire Department Deployment Analysis Presentation Simison: Okay. All right. Thank you very much. Next item is Item 20, which is the Fire Department deployment analysis presentation. Turn this over to Chief Butterfield. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, let me real quick before Chief Butterfield begins. I just -- for Council's benefit, we have got significant members of our Fire Department that are here for what I think is a really important presentation and I don't want chief to feel pressed for time and so I guess I want to just give Council some -- some perspective. We have got this presentation. We can move a budget amendment to next week or add that to Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 17 of 26 our main meeting. We do have a public hearing scheduled tonight. I do think it is important for us to try and do those public hearings on time. I guess I'm looking for some direction from Council is do you want to take a brief recess, you could have a quick bite of dinner and, then, we would just go from the fire presentation, then, into our regular meeting or are you comfortable with us delaying our public hearing to give fire the opportunity to provide their presentation in full? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Maybe just -- I'm open to all of that if it works for the Fire Department. If it works for their schedule to take a brief recess. I also think this is mainly informational at this point. I was actually going to volunteer to just give a quick overview of sort of how this came to be, this presentation. But I'm open to that if -- if it works for the Council and the Fire Department I think that's the question. Butterfield: Works for me. Simison: Can I ask how long you think your presentation is? Butterfield: Twenty minutes. Simison: How about we just go through the presentation and see where we are at that point in time and, then, we can either break or keep going. Cavener: Just -- Mr. Mayor, I appreciate that. We didn't want to interrupt the flow. This is important info and we didn't want to put them in a position where they had to press pause halfway through, so -- Simison: And I believe Mr. Miles is prepared to do the amendment on the 6.00 p.m. if we want to do it at 6.00 p.m. tonight, so -- Chief Butterfield. Butterfield: Mr. Mayor, Member of Council -- Members of Council, thank you for the opportunity. As Council Member Strader had mentioned, there was some input that she had to the fire department, request for some deployment modeling after we met and reviewed some of the analytical software that we use in the Fire Department and following up on that meeting she mentioned a request to come up with some different -- four different deployment models. So, I will -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Butterfield: Go ahead. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 18 of 26 Strader: If you don't mind I'm just going to take one second to just maybe give a little lead in if you are -- we have Dark Horse Analytics, which I think everyone is familiar with at this point. Phenomenal tool. Sat down with Deputy Chief Butterfield and a team, was blown away by the amount of analytics and information that that tool can provide and that was the genesis of this presentation was, hey, you know, we have hired many firefighters through the SAFER grant. We have a good amount of them coming on board and we have a lot of resourcing. That doesn't necessarily mean that any one deployment model is the right answer for us at this point and I just sort of asked the question could you show us four different options, advantages and disadvantage of different deployment models, so that we could become educated going forward on what those look like in our new analytical tool Dark Horse and just to get a feel for starting to socialize some different approaches that we could take. Thank you. Simison: As well as -- part of this also played into the conversations around the station remodels that we are proposing, the how, the when, the where and the why. So, it -- it is not just, like I say, theoretical. Some of it is very -- how do we move forward in the immediate future with some decision points that are going to be put before us. So, with that Chief Butterfield. Butterfield: Thank you, sir. So, the first thing I do want to mention in this presentation is all of these options, as I kind of go through the four different options that have been created, none of these increased staffing beyond the current level, including the SAFER grant. So, as we move forward this is inclusive of all personnel that are currently hired by the Fire Department. None of this will incur any future hiring as described in the deployment model. So, as was -- was requested we broke it down to four different models moving forward. Four person staffed apparatus at eight stations is the first model and I will elaborate on each one of these as we move forward. The second model is a multi-company staffing at Station One. So, a three person engine and a four -- four person truck company. Currently right now at Station One we just have a four person truck company. So, we would be adding an additional apparatus at that particular station. The third model, a new fire station located at River Valley Road and Eagle Road with an engine company. The premise of this really came out of Dark Horse Analytics and when we look at the predictive analytic modeling that that software does it really points to that area of the city being the next location for a fire station at some point in the future based on road travel, based on call volume, based on the number of calls that we are projecting, the growth, number of residents that are going to be added, multi-family residents that are being added, so on and so forth. Recognize that at some point that's going to probably be the likely location of a new fire station. And, then, the fourth model was adding a two person squad at Station Four and at Station Five and I will talk a little bit more in that particular model what squads are and a little bit more in depth on that. Some of the key performance matrix criteria goals that we looked at that were established by the Fire Department as we went through the accreditation process and developed our standards of cover are what we want to achieve. Our goal on every emergency call and lights and sirens response to calls, we want to arrive at an EMS call in seven minutes and 50 seconds from the moment we get the alert at the fire station to arriving on scene. Eight minutes for fire calls. We get a Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 19 of 26 little bit of buffer time in there, because we know we got to put on more gear equipment before we actually go on some fire calls and, then, the arrival of an ERF response, what we refer to as an effective response force, and I will talk a little bit more about that -- about 11 minutes and the ERF is essentially getting enough people on scene to do critical tasks in a short amount of time. So, three fire engines, a ladder truck and a battalion chief in under 11 minutes. These are our goals as we have established them. And when I talk about an effective response force this -- a lot of work went into what we call a critical task analysis. So, this is indicative of the things that we need to do on an emergency scene in very quick time, in quick order with the personnel. So, we have a tiered response to our structure fire. Somebody calls 911 and says my house is on fire. Immediately out the door, we are sending three fire engines, a ladder truck and a battalion chief on just that request. A lot of the times actually more times than not it doesn't turn out to be a house on fire, it turns out to be a multitude of other things, a shorting outlet, furnace issues, burnt food on the stove, a cigarette butt in a planter box. But we initially send out that initial response. When we do get on scene or even in route and we realize, no, this house is on fire, we have flames coming from the house, we will add additional resources to that call, including another fire engine, another ladder truck, another battalion chief, an ambulance, an ambulance supervisor, because now we know we have got a major incident, it's going to need a lot of people and when we are on those particular ones, through the critical tasking we need a minimum of 23 people to get on scene to handle the events that are taking place on those types of emergency scenes and, then, we are not even getting into the next level of an apartment fire, a big box store fire, multi-level high rise fires, then, you are adding another 20 or 30 people, because now you have just complexed the incident by the different divisions that need all of these different critical tasking. The matrix and the quantitative data that we get out of Dark Horse is pretty profound in what we -- travel time. We know the travel time distance and we know ERF, but more people on scene, what doesn't get told in the story of the -- of the quantitative analytic piece is what happens when we get on scene and needing more people on scene sooner. The National Institute of Standards and Technologies has done some critical task evaluations and 25 percent faster with four person crews than three person crews on getting those critical tasks that have been identified and getting them completed in a timely order. More personnel on scene quicker allows for better rotation, rehab. You can imagine when it's a hundred degrees outside, like we get here, people are going in the work cycles of firefighters inside a burning house, in their gear, on air, get much more compressed when we are dealing in the summer months. So, we understand we can get people through that quicker. We get people on scene quicker. OSHA standard two in, two out rule. Anybody that goes into a burning building if we have two people going in we have to have by OSHA standards two people out and we -- it's hard to achieve when you only have -- send three people on a fire apparatus. They have to wait until somebody else gets there. Certainly reduced physical strain. As you can imagine more people are showing up. We are able to, you know, lift ladders more easily with more people. We are able to forcible entry. Breaking down doors is easier with more people, especially if you have to do multiple doors on the same building. Stretching hose lines is easier. So, we -- mental fatigue, mental strain. Injuries related to that is another area of -- the arrival of more people sooner, which is not necessarily in the quantified piece matrix of Dark Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 20 of 26 Horse and, then, improved outcomes from CPR. Resuscitation efforts is another one and I will elaborate a little bit more on that. So, I believe -- let's see if we have -- so, this is an example of a fire -- and you can imagine as we have a fire occurring -- and this is actually not uncommon for us to have two fires, especially with how close fire -- homes are being built in the city and, then, you get a shed in between there that catches on fire. We actually get these a couple times a year, but you can imagine with this fire happening, the multitude of things that I just went over need to happen quickly. We need to get a lot of people as quickly as we can to the incident to start handling all those critical tasks as quickly as possible. So, what is it we are looking for when we arrive on scene of a building that's on fire? And this -- I think this particular picture is actually becoming very common in Meridian. We are seeing a lot of garage fires due to lithium ion battery -- thermal runaway of lithium ion batteries. People leaving lithium ion batteries on chargers, whether that's for their leaf blowers, for their lawn mowers, for the cordless drills, we are seeing quite a rise and I will tell you our crews are really good at stopping these fires. If we get there quick we can get water and save the house from burning down and contain the fire to the garage. I would -- I would say our crews are very good. We get a lot of these a year and we stop it just like in this picture a lot of the times, because we can get there quick, we can get people on these quick and stop that from happening. So, our containment goal -- we want to contain the fire to the room of origin. The quicker we can get crews on scene and wherever that fire started if we can keep it from getting up into an attic and burning the house down or into multiple rooms, then, we have -- we have kind of met our goal. Our rescue goal. In short, all occupants are out of the building. We just had a fire yesterday afternoon -- and this includes pets. So, we saved a couple of pets yesterday afternoon. Had a fire in northwest Meridian. Overhaul. We want to ensure no elements of fire remain when we leave and salvage goal protect any owner -- owners of belongings, especially as we get through, you know, taking down the overall first fire attack, if we can get fire knocked down and, then, as we are looking for hot spots, we are pulling ceilings looking for any growth. You get people's belongings out. Very common to have a quick conversation with the homeowner. Is there anything that's valuable or very important to you that we can go ahead and get out of the house and give to you before we start spraying a whole lot of more water as we are looking for hot spots and things like that. So, that's another common goal that we look to achieve. Our first arriving -- so, from a data perspective our first arriving apparatus at building fires in Meridian, our response area, in under eight minutes we can right now do that 63 percent of the time and our ERF right now in Meridian, trying to get all three fire engines, a ladder truck and a battalion chief on scene in under 11 minutes -- about 30 percent of the time. Some of that I think is really relative to the fact we have one battalion chief covering the entire area. It takes a while for them to drive across town. So, we are not going to get that entire complement of apparatus there that quick. I just want to cover a few points of -- across the bottom of this particular slide you can see growth of fire. So, as we look at -- fire doubles in size about every minute and we recognize that as fire is progressing through burning of a house that survivability goes down rather quickly as that fire grows from a hundred percent survivability to 30 percent survivability, sometimes in just a matter of minutes. So, again, this really speaks to the fact of how quickly we can get firefighters on scene in the shortest amount of time. Another area I don't think we really talk about is the Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 21 of 26 impact of the citizens of our city. Is that what if we don't get there and stop that fire in our goal, contain it to the room of origin, the impact of months of displacement for those homeowners can be pretty extensive. If we can stop it quick, like we did in the example of the picture of the garage, I mean ten to 20 percent of damage we -- I mean they are out three months and they are back in their home. But if we start losing that structure and we start getting complete burn of the structure upwards in 18 months that now they are going to be displaced from their home, which is quite an economic impact and a major inconvenience for them. Another area, too, is just the cost of repair. If we can stop that fire quickly and looking at this is that fire progressive all the way up -- once we start losing that or we stop it in a half burned house, now they have to have an expense of tearing what remaining part of the houses down and, then, getting to a point of, then, rebuilding the house. So, two scenarios. One for four person staffed engines. This particular graph is from our Dark Horse Analytic model. This is, essentially, a heat graph that they use using hexagons. So, this is essentially where we are headed right now in July. We will be moving to a four person staffed engine apparatus at all -- all fire stations and from a statistical analysis, using -- using the analytics it doesn't really change our first to arrival time. We are not really going to be getting a time quicker just by adding another body to an apparatus. We will be able to get done things quicker on scene when it comes to critical task, but first two doesn't really change. So, our ERF we were at about 30 percent. By doing this we do increase that to about 35 percent by getting more people on scene quicker in that under 11 minute time frame. So, we will definitely see a rise in the percentage time of that. And, then, there is some other important aspects of the four person staffing, even some internal testing that we had done with the training division and our own personnel recognizing if we arrive on scene on a mock training scenario with a three person crew how quickly can we get water supply established? So, hooking the hose, dropping the hose off of the engine to a fire hydrant, connecting to the fire hydrant, charging water from the fire hydrant to the fire engine and stretching a line. We saw a 74 percent increase in time savings just by going to a four -- from a three person to a four person crew and with the times that are noted on this particular slide and, then, also a 27 percent increase in time savings for victim removal. Again, this was our own data, our own training officers, our own people, recognizing in seven minutes and 46 seconds for a three person crew versus five minutes and 38 seconds for a four person crew. And, then, the EMS outcomes -- improved EMS outcomes on calls certainly as you can imagine if we are arriving with four people or with just a greater people responding EMS providers, EMTs and paramedics, the division of labor is going to be better, lifting and moving patients. We actually sustain back injuries of our personnel every year from lifting heavy and so you can imagine if somebody is four, five, six hundred pounds on the ground and you -- you end up with an engine company of three people and an ambulance crew of -- of two people and you need to move this people -- this person onto a gurney and out to the ambulance, a lot of the times we do end up with some -- some injuries that I think are certainly more labor is going to help reduce those -- those potential injuries. Vehicle extrication is another one. More people on the scene quicker we can do extrication, patient care, stabilization -- stabilization of a vehicle, things of that nature. Sometimes we provide assistance to critical transports. The ambulances only show up with two personnel. Sometimes in our city we have some pretty significant -- either injuries or Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 22 of 26 medical conditions that require additional person in the back of the ambulance to assist. Certainly having more people is going to help with that. And, then, CPR performance. You can imagine somebody in cardiac arrest there is a lot to be done in a very short amount of time. We need somebody to do chest compression, set up the AED, manage the airway, breathe for the patient, medication administration, et cetera. It's kind of a complex series of events and more people make less work of that. The next scenario I'm going to move to is our new station with the three person staffing. So, this is a new fire station. Eagle corridor. Probably over in that the River Valley Road area. Looking at the matrix when we add a new station over there it does increase our first due and for fire and EMS and it increases our ERF a little bit, but not quite as much and so this bar graph really shows where our first due -- EMS first due, non EMS and ERF. So, if you think about it it makes sense where Station Three, Station Four and Station One are going to see a big increase of all three of those, because there is now a new apparatus in that particular area of the city. Very much on the east side of the city. So, all of those matrix are going to be quite much -- they are going to be a lot better. But Station Five, Station Six, Station Seven, and the rest of the city doesn't have that influx of those new personnel and that new apparatus. So, it does kind of shift really good over there, but not quite as much in the rest of the city. Scenario three, the multi-company staffing at Station One. This is one that as we ran the analytics I was actually quite surprised myself at what we saw. So, first do EMS and first do non-EMS doesn't change a lot, because, again, I haven't completely solved the time space continuum, but recognizing that where people -- how we move quickly is going to pretty much stay the same even, though we are adding two other apparatus. But I think what was really important in this is what it created in the ERF across the entire city was pretty profound. Across the entire city 9.4 percent as a collective and, then, you can see each individual station area pretty substantial increase, because now you have an apparatus with three people that it can get across the city pretty quickly within, you know, those emergency events for the critical need and to accomplish those critical tasks that we need accomplished on those particular incidents and recognizing that there is also some other -- now we have another apparatus, there is some -- outside of the quantitative data that we are looking at we have two apparatus at Station One. So, if Station Eight needed to send an apparatus in to downtown for some training, we now have an apparatus we can move out and provide coverage that particular area of the city where right now when Station Eight comes in for training we don't have coverage. So, there is some other benefits by this particular model that isn't even captured necessarily in the data. And scenario four, two squads, Station Four and Station Five and, again, if you are looking at the matrix a little bit of first due increase definitely some increase to the ERF as well, six percent, not quite nine percent that we got from Station One. When I talk about a squad, this is really the vehicle that we are talking about. We recognize in the city the majority of our calls are EMS calls, 70 to 80 percent, and I would even say 20 to 30 percent of our actual calls don't need a fire engine and they don't need three people on a fire engine. They could be handled with this type of vehicle, with a paramedic and an EMT very successfully. We run about a -- between our lift assist and fall patients we run about 1,100 calls a year. It can easily be handled with this particular type of -- it would still include these people on this apparatus, would go to fire calls, so they would be part of an ERF and be able to round out the -- in the fire call where we need those critical task Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 23 of 26 people and there is some other things. We can certainly contain small fires. This would have water on it. It would have vehicle extrication on it. It would still be able to I think handle duck rescues. As you all know as Council would do a lot of duck rescues. Certainly could mitigate those as well. We could phase these in and this particular vehicle as the purchase of the vehicle would be eligible for impact fees and, again, we wouldn't be adding personnel, this would just be a shift of people. So, as I'm kind of getting close to wrapping this up, scenario one will be in place in July. We will have four person staffing on our fire apparatus in a couple months and I would refer to this as really good. This is really good for the city and it's a really good deployment model. The next scenario. Building a fire station. It's going to definitely be the greatest expense. I think we don't even have necessarily land identified yet. If we were to start moving through a process identifying land, entitlements related to that and everything related, probably four to five year window out by the time we actually had a fully staffed functional fire station. I think even at best maybe four years. Scenario three. This is the dual engine ladder truck at Station One. Readily achievable. We have fire apparatus to do this and a greatest overall ERF performance increase. So, I would go this is much better. So, we went from really good to what I would describe as much better by moving into that particular model. We are going to be doing some remodels on Station One. I think that will be part of that conversation. And, then, scenario four I think is the best overall. The squad approach. A lot of other cities are starting to move to that. The Eagle Fire Department's moved to a squad approach. Nampa has moved to a squad approach. I know the city of Boise did a trial on a squad with really good results, so I know they are heading in that direction over there as well. So -- and that particular model the greatest impact on reduction of apparatus maintenance repair and replacement over time certainly is -- as we come before Council with the request for fire apparatus, which is getting more and more expensive, but we recognize here is a way we can solve some of that if we are not sending really expensive fire apparatus to a lot of calls we don't need to we should see a reduction in some of that. So, my final thoughts for you. Really the leader's intent from the fire service -- from the leadership of the fire department is to really go from what's really good, which we will be seeing here in a couple months, to what is much better as we remodel a station and -- and provide dual company response out of Station One to ultimately hopefully down the road a best overall squad. So, that's really kind of what -- what this phased approach as we move forward in. Upcoming fire stations are certainly going to be provided options to accommodate some of these deployment models and be part of that -- that conversation and I do want to reiterate as we did kind of move through all of these models we are not going to be coming and asking for more personnel to make any of these successful. We will be able to do these with the personnel we have. So, with that, Council, Mayor, I would stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you, chief. I'm not going to put words in your mouth, but I'm going to put words in your mouth for you. For the immediate time being there is no request for any additional employees to -- as we look at these four options, but I'm sure that the -- if the direction of the city is four person staffing generally it may be four person staffing and one or two of these other models in addition that would not be four persons staffing, but two person staffing on something as an aside. So, I don't want to hold you to that Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 24 of 26 forever in case some of you are here in ten years. We said we would never be asked from that standpoint. So, Council, questions? Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Appreciate the presentation and the overview. This is great data and fascinating. I'm impressed by the squad concept and had a chance to go on a ride along this weekend and there were two call outs for fire to come and assist and that squad would have been perfect at the speedway and, then, one in north Meridian. Could have handled this -- the situation easily. Can I just pivot and say what, then, happens if at the same time a squad of two is out, do you have coverage back at the station if -- if a fire breaks out somewhere else? Butterfield: Yeah. Councilman Whitlock, yeah. So, the idea of the squad concept would -- it would be co-located in a station with a fire apparatus. So, there would be a probably three -- three person or four person staff fire apparatus and a two person squad. So, the squad would primarily be covering EMS calls. Would still go on fire calls, but if they were out on an EMS call and a fire call came in or another EMS call, then, certainly the engine would respond. Overton: Mr. Mayor, just a quick comment. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I think I'm truly amazed that we are talking about a concept that I used to watch in 1972 on television called Emergency 51 that was all about a two person squad truck from a fire department responding and here we are back with it again. Taylor: Mr. Mayor. I watched the reruns not the original. Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I was born seven years later. This is -- I'm going to piggyback on the squad concept. Really I like that concept, because it seems like a more efficient use of time and I really like the idea of not burdening or wearing out our really expensive apparatus for something that's obviously going to be a lot more cheaper to maintain and replace. My question, though, is when you get a call do you know if it's something that you could send a squad to or is that known before you deploy? Or are you on your way you are figuring out? Can you kind of talk to me about how you would understand what type of response you need and when and how quickly? Butterfield: Absolutely, Councilman Taylor. The -- so, from the 9-1-1 dispatch, you know, they pretty much send us to whatever -- whatever the type of emergency that they receive in dispatch, then, attaches a certain response to that emergency. So, we Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 25 of 26 could certainly tie it to whatever the response criteria is and I think we have like 3,400 different potential call -- call outs that attach certain apparatus to it, so -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you so much. You are -- you and your team put a ton of work into this and we really appreciate it. I think it's just going to help us get better. I -- I also was very interested in the alternative response vehicles just based on the price tag of our new ladder that we are pursuing. So, any update on that I guess would be my only question, where we are at with our -- are we making progress in trying to get a new ladder truck. Sorry, that's a curve ball I didn't prepare you for, but -- Butterfield: I believe it is in the procurement department of the city right now. Strader: Excellent. Butterfield: Working through the contract. Strader: That's so great. Thank you. Simison: Thank you, Chief Butterfield, Chief Blume, team, for bringing this -- a lot of -- a lot of good information, a lot of questions still to be answered and a lot of practicality as we move forward, so thank you. 21. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the Amount of $80,020 for consulting services for new Department of Justice ADA Web Content Accessibility Rule Simison: Council, still want to move Item 21 to the next meeting? Okay. Then with that do I have a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn the work session. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and a second to adjoin the work session. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it, we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Meridian City Council Work Session June 3,2025 Page 26 of 26 MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:48 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-17-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-17-2025 C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the May 13, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council May 13,2025 Page 18 of 18 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Yeah. If Dave can just send us an invite with time and where to be to all the Council I think that would be helpful. Simison: Yeah. I just wanted to make sure you got it, because I just saw it on my calendar yesterday. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Cavener. Cavener: I move we adjourn. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All -- Strider: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed. nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FOUR AYES. TWO ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:40 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-3-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-3-2025 C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the May 20, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session May 20,2025 Page 29 of 29 Strader: Fantastic. I think we have a solid plan and with that we are at the end of our meeting. Cavener: Madam Vice-President, move we adjourn the work session. Strader: Okay. Do I have a second? Little Roberts: Second. Strader: All right. Fantastic. All in favor say aye. And we are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5.53 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 6 / 3 2025 MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the May 20, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council May 20,2025 Page 25 of 25 Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, absent; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics or do I have a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn the meeting. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Motion and a second to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:18 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 6-3-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 6-3-2025 �I c� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Elevate Self Storage Full Release of Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2024- 0029) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034468 Boise;Idaho Pgs=1 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Elevate ESMT-2024-0029 FULL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED: ,SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTOR: PUBLIC STORAGE OPERATING COMPANY A MARYLAND REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, ;by easement dated February 27, 2024 and recorded as Instrument Number 2024- 009966 in the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation, over and across the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS,the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby vacate, relinquish,release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described,with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 3rd day of June 20 1-21-2025 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simiso yor 6-3-2025 (ZI/ Attest by Chri ohnson," y'- Jerk 6-3-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ss. County of Ada This record was'ael+nowledged before me on 6-3-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk respectively. (stamp) Na&ycWojj Notary Signature CHARLENE WAY My Commission Expires- 3-2 -2028 COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Version 0I/01/2020 c� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Millwood Subdivision Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2025-0040) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034471 Boise;Idaho Pgs=5 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivision Name: Millwood SubdivWon For Internal Use Only ESMT-2025-0040 Record Number: ------ PEDESTRIAN AN PATHWAY EASEMENT TFUS Easement Agreement made this 3r y o _ June 20 25 .between E is Develor)ment Victo ("Gr 'tor")and the City f Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway;and WHEREAS,the Grantor desires to grant an casement to establish a public pathway and provide connectivity to present and future portions of the pathway; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit"A" and depicted on Exhibit" " attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement,including,but not limited to,buildings,trash enclosures, carports,sheds, fences,trees, or shrubs: IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto,that the Grantor shall re air and maintainthe pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become art of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 1 Version 01f01/2024 then, to such extent such easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: Epic Development Victory, LLC l STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada) / This record was acknowledged before me on�/f yl2S (date) by William Mathews, on behalf of Epic Development Victorry,_LLC in the following representative capacity: Member.. E SYDNI FARRIS COMMISSION#20250737 L1 NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Signature STATE OF IDANO I f My Commission Expires: Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-3-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-3-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 EXHIBIT B — PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT DRAWING SHOWING A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT FOR MILLWOOD SUBDIVISION LYING IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 29, T.3N., R.1 E., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2025. 19 20 S89' 49' 00'E 2680.69' p 30 29 1000.94' 1679,76' � CPQrF y2 02 4-0491 69 N 1/4 COR CP&F 02021-037427 alp N �I0 0 N "I \ W n� n O N \` N O 3.00'(TYP.) L>\\ GRAPHIC SCALE 2? 10 f .0 BID To r-301 [IN I(LT) vKN. 40 fi- \ 3.00 LEGOD \ �\ SECTION LINE \ BOUNDARY LINE LOT LINE — — — -- — — EASEMENT �� `u EN LATERAL CENTERLINE r• — TIE LINE \\ —_ FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 1575 00 FOUND BRASS CAP ¢ O \ ✓� FOUND 5/8"IRON PIN 4p�LIu •—�3Q SET 5/8' IRON PIN "fI'F • SET 1/2" IRON PIN 3 CALCULATED POINT-NOT SET J' BROK£N LINE mac'• �4 Parcel Line Table Curve Table \ Llnc / Length Direction Curve / Length Rodius Delto Chord Dheetion Chord Length \ L1 7.60 N59' 27' 12'E Ct 6.50 21.50' IT 19' 14"1 N66' 06' 50-F 6.47' C4 E SPRINGLOYD ST '11 J.J. HOWARD 4/�4 "Emfff:A ® A I °` MILLWOOD SUBDIVISION CL avow �.. — ae• cLs 22oso3 EXHIBIT B — PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT a�a mr a,a��wr r..sm av9 wwu Exhibit A Millwood Subdivision Pedestrian Pathway Easement A pedestrian pathway easement lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 29, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at brass cap marking the Northwest corner of Section 29; thence 5.89°49'00"E. along the North line of said Section 2S a distance of 1000.94 feet to a point; thence 5.00'11'00"W. a distance of 204.08 feet to a point, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence 5.00'01'30"E. a distance of 22.77 feet to a point; Thence S_37°58'06"E. a distance of 197.53 feet to a point; Thence S.30°32'48"E. a distance of 83.04 feet to a point; Thence 6.50 feet along a non-tangent curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 21.50 feet, a delta of 17°19'14", and a chord bearing N.68'06'50"E. a distance of 6.47 feet to a point; Thence N.59'27'12"E. a distance of 7.60 feet to a point; Thence N.30°32'18"W. a distance of 84.92 feet to a point; Thence N.37*58'06"W. a distance of 216.40 feet to a point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 4078 square feet, more or less. 15758 s�,-7--7-2SQ C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Life Church Partial Release of Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0051) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034470 Boise,Idaho Pgs=8 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM ESMT-2025-005I CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Life Church Electronically Recorded PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING PARTIALLY RELEASED: Water Easement GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTORS: _Life Church Inc. 1, INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated February 16th -2012 and recorded as Instrument Number 1.1201.8877 in the land records of Ada County,State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("the Easement"),upon the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS, the continuance of a certain portion of the Easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the premises, the City of Meridian does hereby release, vacate, and abandon that certain portion of the Easement on the lands more particularly described on Exhibit A, and depicted on Exhibit B,attached hereto and incorporated herein. All rights and privileges under the under the above-described document in and to the remaining lands covered by the Easement shall remain and continue in the Grantee and shall not be affected in any way hereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 3rd ay of June 2025 CITY OF MERIDIAN AQ Robert E. imiso Ma or 6-3-2025 � � C.Ni tl illIANi<-_. Attest by ChrPohnso°°,,rG `�Clerk 6-3-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss: County of Ada This record was acknowledged before me on 6-3-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Signature CHARLENE WAY -28-2028 COMMISSION No. 67390 My Commission.Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO version 01/0112020 INDENTURE, made this /&4day of 74 20-LJbetween_ST 9-j Ito I'D,we s,«Lthe parties of the first part,and hereinafter called the Grantors,and the City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,the party of the second part,and hereinafter called the Grantee; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Grantors desire to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described;and WHEREAS,the water main is to be provided for through an underground pipeline to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS,it will be necessary to maintain,service and subsequently connect to said pipeline from time to time by the Grantee; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantors,and other good and valuable consideration,the Grantors do hereby give,grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the construction,operation,maintenance,repair,replacement of a water main over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of a water line and their allied facilities,together with their maintenance,additional connection thereto,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee,its successors and assigns forever. j IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto,that after construction,making repairs,performing other maintenance or making subsequent connection to the water line,Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such construction,repairs and maintenance.However,Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing,replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that they will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees, brush,or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement,which would interfere with the use of said easement,for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street,then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof,shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTORS do hereby covenant with the Grantee that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land,and that they have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that they will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: President 'rya? ..+C.i/w•:6� w b 1' Address Secretary • 117t l-tr STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) On this day of_fe�+ ,20 1'*-,-,before me,the undersigned,allotary Public in and for said State, personally appeared _ 5TA, and flwJ , known or identified to me to be Yhe President and Secretary,respectively,of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. . Pow" .A K.q y ggjpN•. s'>G NOTARY PU LIC FOR 9�AWEO 111 N, ff Residin at •t' 0=T49t' Commission Expires I- — N-+ '(43LIC Water Main Easement EASMT WTR.doc GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN SD A Ere, mayern l�eY. r�s1X City of E IDIAN IDANO a SEAL % Attest b aycee L.Holman,City Clerk ���r�►.r,�ets�s'°`e,ey� Approved By City Council On:� o� B STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) On this_ _09—day of , 20 11 fo ,th undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,perso all a eared_. and JAYCEE L. HOLMAN,known to me to be the 9e` r an` C ity Jerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official sea]the day and year first above written. /pa� 1�Oo�Jjpyp 00-bqX a.�aLQ-0 OO 0 T Y PUBLI FOR O SEAL) Re rig at: WP,rd�e.✓1 Commission Expires:_c IN✓i � t �c)1 000 oQ•#l�:�oom Water Main Easement EASMT WTR.doc Exhibit"A" Job No. 11-049 December 21, 2011 Water Line Easement Description An easement under, over and across a portion of Lot 1 of Block 1 of Commerce Park Subdivision in the Southwest %of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, in the City of Meridian, County of Ada, State of Idaho described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 1 of Block 1 of Commerce Park Subdivision in the Southwest%of Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 1 East, Boise Meridian; Thence North 88028'58"West, 72.07 feet, along the north line of said Lot 1, to the Point of Beginning; Thence South 00°36'48"West, 212.61 feet; Thence South 51°27'40"West, 28.12 feet; Thence North 38032'20"West, 23.68 feet; Thence North 51°27'40" East, 21.61 feet; Thence North 00036'48" East, 198.67 feet to a point on said north line of Lot 1; Thence South 88028'58" East, 20.00 feet, along said north line, to the Point of Beginning. Said easement containing therein a calculated area of 4,701 square feet. o�►�LA ec'�EelsT�rA 552 .,,/Z/d3�i6 90'rB OF1 P�QN CFR E. Copyrighted®2011 by Tri County Surveying,Inc. 510 So.Washington Ave.,P.O.Box 974,Emmett,ID 83617-0974 Phone:(208)365.7470 Fax:(208)365-2880 114 CORNER EXHIBIT 'B' 8 9 WATERLINE EASEMENT IN LOT I of BLOCK 1 C R. No 110054175 OF COMMERCE PARK SUBDI VISION IN THE SOUTHWEST X OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN IN THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO. WI� a N n al � J_r •� BLOCK 2 70' CJ11MMERCE PARK SURDJVISION COMMERCIAL COURT N_88'28'58'•W cy �_ _478.30' N78'42'48"E �- N N88-28'58"W 29872' i ll -.35 1201 72.07'^ 70 U/ N LJ-r 2 BOCK `1 p� WATER LINE EASEMENT 0J1 ME:RCr PARK aJ �,3 SUBDIVISION a � CAI o ao�/N o 0 �i lu z, o a rZ v N51'274 p 21.51 / cn N38'32' 0"W 23 6�- 3 i cl N W SCALE, 1" = 100' EXISTING BUILDING 0 z , c) I z SL OCK 1 �pL LANp C01` M rRCZ PARK SUBDIVISION ��� ��sccT>: SG� o- 6552 N88728 55 W 408.29' f�LIL�II O z 1 70' -pOTglf O F TR/COUNTY SURVEYING; INC. cFR E. B�e� PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 570 So. Woshington Ave.. P.O. Box 974 Emmett, Idoho 8361 7-09 74 8 g Phone- (208) 365-7470 DECEMBER 2011 17�16 INDEX No 311-09-3-0-0-45-3721 JOB No, 11-049WEsmt C.R No. 110054774 c� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Elevate Franklin Sanitary Sewer Easement (ESMT-2025-0052) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034476 Boise,Idaho Pgs=7 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Project Name or Subdivision Name' Electronically Recorded Elevate Franklin Sanitary Sewer&Water Mein Easement Number; 1 For Internal Use Only ESMT-2025-0052 Record Number. SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this_3rd ilay71ofJura 2025 between Public Storage Operating Company, a Maryland real estate investment trust("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho unicipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described;and WHEREAS,the sanitary sewer is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by tine Grantee NOW, TIIEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and vahrable consideration,the Grantordocs licrebygive,grant and convey unto the Grantee tile'right-of ®lay for an casement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The casement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and allied facilitics,'together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such'facilitics"at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said casement and right-of--way unto the :said,Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties lhcreto,that af3er making repairs or perfortning other maintenance,Grantee shall restore the area of the casement and adjacent property to that existent,prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. I Iowever,' Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this casement that was placed there in violation ofthis casement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place orallow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the casement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said casement,_including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures; carports,sheds,fences,trees,or deep-rooted shrubs. Sanitary Sewer Easement Page f Version 01/01/2024 GRANTOR: PUBLIC STORAGE OPERATING COMPANY a Maryland real estate investment trust By: Namc: 0 Mtn- ,L Its: ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validity of that document. State of California County of_LOS On—ft n I 3012025 _before me._WJ 116 fLgV1 q S NO!YN INA 0 (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared Auirm ufAw who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s)istare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/They executed the same in his/herrtheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signattire(s)on the instrument the person(s),or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted,executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct LESLIE FARIAS WITNESS m hand and official seal _ ' �, tiotary P:blk California Y r Los Anye,es County s `:i Commission:2442091 � ,.�•' µy Corn.Expires ray 28,2027 Signature (Seal) Sanitary Sewer Easement Page 3 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison, Mayor 6-3-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) 6-3-2025 This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Sanitary SewerFasement Page 4 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 Exhibit A 2nd Revised City of Meridian Sanitary Sewer Easement Description for Lot 1, Block 1 of Umbria Subdivision The following Describes a Parcel of Land for the Purpose of a Sanitary Sewer Easement being a Portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Umbria Subdivision as filed in Book 101 of Plats at Pages 13200 through 13204, Records of Ada County, Idaho, lying in a portion of South 1/2 of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more Particularly Described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast Corner of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian; From which, the South 1/4 Corner of said Section 10 bears North 89036'09" West, 2640.84 feet; Thence along the Southerly Boundary Line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 10, North 89036'09" West, 1558.90 feet to the Intersection point of North Umbria Hills Avenue; Thence leaving said Southerly Boundary Line, and along the Centerline of North Umbria Hills Avenue, North 01°12'22" East, 464,86 feet to the Intersection Point of West Perugia Street; Thence leaving said Centerline, South 45°20'30" West, 62.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence, North 88047'38" West, 14.82 feet; Thence, South 01°12'25" West, 24.50 feet; Thence, South 88047'35" East, 31.34 feet; Thence Northwesterly 21.76 feet along the arc of a curve to the left having a Radius of 23.00 feet, a Central angle of 54012'41" and a Long Chord which bears, North 25°53'59" West, 20.96 feet to point of Reverse Curvature; Thence Northwesterly 9.11 feet along an arc of a curve to the right having a Radius of 62.50 feet, a Central angle of 08°20'49" and a Long Chord which bears, North 48049'55" West, 9.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: The above Described Parcel of Land contains 0.01 Acres (637 Sq. Ft.), more or less. LA /b/�J 825� a �4 4 of 1OP\X� N S89'59'52"W 365.19' N W. Perugia St. o L2 — i. i. Point of N—— —— —— —04 Beginning •.� I C4 L2 ' C4 I f—C3 Lot 1, Block l C3 Umbria Subdivision. L4 Book 101, Page 13200 • I ���/ /// // A ' Curve Table 27' I \� Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length l I ` C3\ 21.76' 23.00' 54-12'41" N25'53'59"W 20.96' I ' L4 i �,>\ C4 9.11' 62.50' 8-20.49" N48'49'55"W 9.10' I W m Legend 1 I Detail" } \0 - Line fable �-. 1"=20' Found Brass Cap / • i N X Found Aluminum Cap LU Line Bearing Length + iv O Calculated Point \ L1 S45'20'30"W 62.50' I z —— — — Boundary Line •\ L2 N88'47'38"W 14.82' I I Existing Gty of Meridian L3 S01-12-25"W 24.50' I NP1 LANp Sewer & Water Easement Line New City of Meridian Sewer `1 L4 S88'47'38"E 31.34' � '� S ���y\ �\G�� F�sG�� Easement Line \` l IQ .5v,4 Tie Line I N a- 8251 W Centerline = 4j - - — — — — Section Line •� •27r IZ TF OF ,QQ'�QZ i c x----x--- Existing Fence —— I E F H.-0 ~ L a —] Existing Concrete Curbing I Z= Z 1081.94' 1558,90' 10 11 N89'36'09"W 2640.84' - - 15 14 Basis of Bearings W. Franklin Rd. P;\Elewte Fronklln 22-307\d.y\Revised Easement E.hBoVl-5-05-25,4*9 5/5/2025 4:29:06 PM City of Meridian Sanitary Sewer Easement Exhibit 2Job N0'ot N Scale: 1"=80' IDAHO 9955W EMERALDST For Lot 1 Block 1 of Umbria Subdivision Sheet Na. (208)8A68570 SURVEY 9015E.ID 01 1 570 0 20 40 80 160 GROUP, LLC Located in the South 1/2 of Section 10, Dwg. Date T.3N.. R.M. S.M., City of Meridian, Ado County, Idaho. 5/5/2025 14.82 n 47 w O s� uy •s 3 0 O c`� P c2 SIP 8251 0 �A�$Of SOP ! �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 5 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2025-0054) Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025=034473 Boise,Idaho Pgs_8 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded Project Name or Subdivision Name: ., Prescott Ridge Subdivision No.5 Sauitary Serer&water Main Easement Number: � ...........Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information..; For Internal use only ESMT-2025-0054 Record Number: SANVTARY— . AN THIS Easement Agreement made this 3rd day of June 20 25 between Hubble Homes,LLC ("Grantor")and the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded d described;and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHMITS A and ) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right of access to such facilities at y and all times. T O HAVE AND T O HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Basement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures, carports, sheds, fences, trees, or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and ofno further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees ofany kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties ofthe first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Hubble Homes, LLC Austin Edwards, Authorized Agent STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County ofAda ) This record was acknowledged before me on 5/19/25 (date) by Austin Edwards (name of individual), [complete the following ifsigning in a representative capacity, or strike thefollowing ifsigning in an individual capacity] on behalf of Hubble Homes, LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:Authorized Agent (type of authority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below j E NNY SMITHLLIC-STATE OF IDAHO ON NUMBER 23655Notar S1 ature ON EXPIRES 2.16 2031 y My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simison,Mayor 6-3-2025 Attest by Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 6-3-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 km E N G I N E E R I N G May 16,2025 Prescott Ridge Subdivision No.5 Project No.24-188 Legal Description City of Meridian Water and Sewer Easement Exhibit A A parcel of land for a City of Meridian Water and Sewer Easement situated in a portion of Lot 18, Block 1 of Peregrine Heights Subdivision(Book 68 of Plats at Pages 7026-7027,records of Ada County,Idaho)and further situated in the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 28,Township 4 North,Range 1 West, B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 28,which bears N00°43'55"E a distance of 2,635.29 feet from a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 28,thence following the easterly line of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 28,S00*43'55"W a distance of 1,119.91 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line, N89°16'05"W a distance of 26.10 feet to a point on the subdivision boundary of Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 1(Book 127 of Plats at Pages 20528-20534,records of Ada County,Idaho) and being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence following said subdivision boundary,S00°34'29"W a distance of 50.01 feet; Thence leaving said subdivision boundary, 125.05 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 525.00 feet,a delta angle of 13°38'49",a chord bearing of N83°22'31"W and a chord distance of 124.75 feet; Thence N76°33'07"W a distance of48.31feet; Thence 115.04 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 479.67 feet,a delta angle of 13°44'30",a chord bearing of N83°27'09"W and a chord distance of 114.77 feet; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of63.30feet; Thence 26.70 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 17.00 feet,a delta angle of 90°00'00",a chord bearing of S45°34'29"W and a chord distance of 24.04 feet; Thence S00°34'29"W a distance of 146.50 feet; Thence S89°25'31"E a distance of 6.50 feet; Thence S00°34'29"W a distance of20.00feet; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of 6.50 feet; Thence S00°34'29"W a distance of 63.05 feet to a point on the subdivision boundary of Prescott Ridge Subdivision No.3; Thence following said subdivision boundary, N89°25'31"W a distance of 10.00 feet,- Thence leaving said subdivision boundary, N00°34'29"E a distance of 48.00 feet; Thence N89°25'31"W a distance of 30.00 feet; Thence S00°34'29"W a distance of 48.00 feet to a point on said subdivision boundary of Prescott Ridge Subdivision No.3; Thence following said subdivision boundary, N89°25'31"W a distance of 10.00 feet, Thence leaving said subdivision boundary, N00°34'29"E a distance of 229.55 feet; Thence 105.24 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 67.00 feet,a delta angle of 90°00'00", a chord bearing of N45°34'29"E and a chord distance of 94.75 feet; Thence S89°25'31"E a distance of 62.91 feet; 5725 North Discovery Way • Boise, Idaho 83713 a 208.639.6939• kmengllp.com Thence 94.86 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said-curve having a radius of 529.67 feet,a delta angle of 10°15'42",a chord bearing of S85°08'57"E and a chord distance of 94.74 feet; Thence N11°03'49"E a distance of 9.07 feet; Thence S78°56'11"E a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence S11°03'49"W a distance of 9.07 feet; Thence 11.77 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 529.67 feet,a delta angle of 01°16'23",a chord bearing of S77°13'05"E and a chord distance of 11.77 feet; Thence S76°33'07"E a distance of 48.33 feet; Thence 113.81 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 475.00 feet,a delta angle of 13°43'42", a chord bearing of 583*24'58"E and a chord distance of 113.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 0.717 acres (31,231 square feet),more or less,and is subject to any existing easements and/or rights-of-way of record or implied. Attached hereto is Exhibit 8 and by this reference is hereby made a part hereof. CC� o 2��-F-� of � PAGE 2 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NORTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 28 N W. Chinden Blvd. 0 80 160 240 Plan Scale: V =80' �I C3 S89'25'31"E C5 L1 1 L 12 POINT OF N 62.9 - vim, -�4 BEGINNING L1I I �Z In— / o C6 C7 (TIE) v m N89'25'31' - W, Lost R w U- ¢G'h 63.30' C2T apld S Lane _ t Ln o_ om 0.00 N7633'07"W C1 — z �0 48.31' I I a, I to c to v i `° I 1 J CQ I r4 [L g Proposed Prescott Y �I z IEn Co ra o I L3 Ridge Subdivision No. 5 o 0 Z I r J � I L8 I I z S J n _ I I S00'34'29W 63.05' L7 6 u r W.Wildfire Dr. u / u I EXISTING CITY OF MERIDIAN SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT PER INST. No. 2024-044665 ~� CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 28 i O 7 0 0 f 4 E N G I N E E R I N G 0 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY < BOISE,IDAHO 83713 'S PHONE(208)639-6939 Exhibit B - City of Meridian Water and Sewer Easement kmengllp.com Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 5 DATE: May 2025 i PROJECT: 24-188 SHEET: A portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 28, 1 OF 2 T.4N., R.1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho !r CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BRG CHORD Cl 525,00' 125.05' 13'38'49" N83'22'31"W 124.75' C2 479.67' 115.04' 13'44'30" N8327'09"W 114.77' C3 17.00' 26.70' 90'00'00" S45-34-29-W 24.04' C4 67.00' 105.24' 90'00'00" N45-34-29"E 94.75' C5 529.67' 94.86' 10'15'42" S85-08-57"E 94.74' C6 529.67' 11.77' 1*16'23" S77'13'05"E 11.77' C7 475.00' 113.81' 13'43'42" S83-24-58"E 113.54' 5 LINE TABLE LINE TABLE V LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE i L1 N89-16-05"W 26.10' L8 N89-25-31"W 30.00' L2 S00'34'29"W 50.01' L9 SOO-34-29"W 48.00' z L3 S89.25-31"E 6.50' L10 N89'25'31"W 10.00' L4 S00'34'29"W 20.00' L11 N11'03'49"E 9.07' T L5 N89'25'31"W 6.50' rLl 2 S78'56'11"E 20.00' L6 N89'25'31"W 10.00' L13 S11'03'49"W 9.07' f L7 N00'34'29"E 48.00' L14 S76'33'07"E 48.33' s s r kml E N G I N E E R I N G i 5725 NORTH DISCOVERY WAY - - BOISE,IDAH0 83713 ' PHONE(208)639-6939 Exhibit B - City of Meridian Water and Sewer Easement kmengllp.com 77 Prescott Ridge Subdivision No. 5 1 DATE: May 2025 PROJECT: 24-188 SHEET: A portion of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 28, 2 OF 2 T.4N., R.1W., B.M., City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho 62.91 s89°25'31"e a n89°25'31"w ' 63.30 ` u:6i'U7'VV _ c 7 O N 7 � e 7 O O V V'r � y� N � 7 N o N p O 8 If I� 112 O Title: Date: 05-16-2025 Scale: 1 inch=80 feet File: Tract 1: 0.717 Acres: 31231 5q Feet: Closure=n76.2606e 0.01 Feet: Precision=1/110601: Perimeter= 1522 Feet 001=s00.3429w 50.01 010=n89.2531w 6.50 019=s89.253le 62.91 002:Rt,R-525.00,Delia-13.3849 011=s00.3429w 63.05 020:Rt.R-529.67,Delta=10.1542 Bng n83.?'3Iw.Chd-124.75 Bng-s85.OS57c,Chd=94.74 003=n76.3307w 48.31 012=n89.2531w 10.00 02 1=n 1 1.0349e 9.07 4430 B s n83.270%-.Chd=I1477 013=n00.3429e48.00 022=s78.5611a20.00 005=n89.2531w 63.30 014=n89.2531w 30.00 023=s 1 1.0349w 9.07 006:Lt.R=17.00,Delta-90.0000 024:RI,R-529.67,Della=01.1623 Bng=s45.3429w,Chd=24.D4 015=s00.3429w 48.00 Bng=07.1305e,Chd-I 1.77 007=s00.3429w 146.50 016=n89.2531w 10.00 025=s76.3307e 48.33 026:008=s89.2531e 6.50 017=100.3429e 229.55 Bng Lt..2475.00.d-113Dcha=13.4342 019:RI.R=67.00.Delta=90.0000 Bng s83.?45&c.Chd-I 13.54 009=s00.3429w 20.00 Bng-n45.3429e.Chd-94.73 �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Order of Denial for Chick-Fil-A (CR-2025-0001) by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., located at 2012 N Eagle. Rd. 3rd June June 3rd 6-3-2025 �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for McKay Farm Subdivision, by Todd Tucker, Boise Hunter Homes, located at S87S S. Eagle Rd. BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: MAY 20, 2025 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: JUNE 3, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF 36 BUILDING ) CASE NO. FP-2025-0006 LOTS AND 8 COMMON LOTS ON ) 9.59 ACRES OF LAND IN THE R-8 ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR MCKAY ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FARM SUBDIVISION. ) BY: TODD TUCKER, BOISE ) HUNTER HOMES ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on May 20, 2025 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code(UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING MCKAY FARM SUBDIVISION, LOCATED IN THE NE '/4 OF THE SE '/4 OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 3N, RANGE IE, BOISE MERIDIAN, MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2025, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 4/2/2025, by CODY M. MCCAMMON, PLS, SHEET ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(MCKAY FARM SUBDIVISION-FP-2025-0006) Page 1 of 3 I OF 5," is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated May 20, 2025, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked "Exhibit A"and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian, pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(MCKAY FARM SUBDIVISION—FP-2025-0006) Page 2 of 3 interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 3rd day of June , 2025. By: Robert E. Simison 6-3-2025 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 6-3-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Coinmunity Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 6-3-2025 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR(MCKAY FARM SUBDIVISION—FP-2025-0006) Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �E DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT HEARING 5/20/2025 Legend - - DATE' Project Location -_---_ TO: Mayor& City Council ::: Area of Impact ' = City Limits _ FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 17N, T- lritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Todd Tucker, Boise Hunter Homes SUBJECT: FP-2025-0006 McKay Farm Subdivision LOCATION: 5875 S. Eagle Road, on the west side --- of S. Eagle Road between E. Amity Road and E. Lake Hazel Road, in the -- ------ NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 32, Township 3N., Range 1 E. (Parcel No. S1132417211) I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Final plat consisting of 36 building lots and 8 common lots on 9.59 acres of land in the R-8 zoning district for McKay Fann Subdivision. B. Issues/Waivers None C. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. D. Decision Approval City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview 11. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing/Proposed Zoning R-8 VLA.2 Adopted FLUM Designation Mediuin Density Residential VI.A.3 Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. McKay Farm Subdivision FP-2025-0006(copy this link into a separate browser). Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:51132417211 Date Retrieved:2025/4/23 )arcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 1,372 648 Surrounding Area 33% Not city I* 1* 0 City Limits 2,398 ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth • Households 02020 Population Change:46.4"/0 Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family e Multi 0% 2%'family p d ® Commercial Preliminary Plats(last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed I I Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0 10 20 30 40 Single-family Multi-family City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics 2.00 - 2,000 Single-family Residential 1.50 1,500 Parcel Diversity N 1.00 ' 1,000 u 0Parcel Count in 0.50 0.66 Cal 500 U 41 0.: *Average Acres 0.00 0.12 0 R-2 R-4 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 10.00 u` 08.03 Residential Net Densit � 5.00 O 5.44 4.54 G O 3.25 O 1.52 0•� Dwelling Units / Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Notes: See VII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. Figure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService • • ls Ready Marginal —f Caution Aci a��\� .011, aNI- t`JZ a`F �t C,°tea lz Notes: See VII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report IL Community Metrics loll. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat(H-2025-0006) for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2020-0030)as required by UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The final plat, as submitted, is in substantial conformance with the previously approved preliminary plat. The preliminary plat was approved with 42 buildable lots and nine common lots. The final plat contains 36 buildable lots and eight common lots. The layout of the subdivision remains the same and no changes were made to the public street or sidewalk dimensions. The applicant states the reduction in the number of buildable lots comes from our desire to slightly increase the lot sizes to match existing lots developed within the adjacent Sky Mesa No. 4 Subdivision located directly to the north of this property. The majority of the lots on the approved preliminary plat were 50 feet wide and were increased to 55 feet wide to accommodate a product line that has already been established in this area. The required open space for this subdivision is 15%,which equates to 1.44 acres. The applicant is providing 1.22 acres of open space which is 12.72%. However,the applicant is including this property into the CC&R's of the Sky Mesa development that is located to the north,west, and south of the property. The Sky Mesa Development is comprised of three subdivision plats,the Southern Highlands, Sky Mesa,and Sky Mesa Highlands. Those three subdivisions are required to have 25.957 acres of open space, and 31.71 acres are provided for an excess of 5.753 acres of open space. The addition of the McKay Farm Subdivision brings the overall open space provided to 32.92 acres, which is 5.53 acres more than what is required for all four subdivisions. Numerous amenities are provided throughout the Sky Mesa development. There are two swimming pools,with accompanying changing facilities and restrooms, and open air ramadas. A tot lot,paved basketball court, sports field,swing set,pedestrian pathways, dog waste stations, and a multi-use pathway. In addition,we are adding a picnic area within the McKay Farm subdivision. Based on the size of the overall Sky Mesa development we are required to provide 43 points worth of amenities. With existing amenities within Sky Mesa and the proposed picnic area amenity in McKay Farm, 47 points worth of amenities are provided. Table 2: Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2020-0030(AZ,PP);DA Inst#2020-095243;TED-2022-0002;TECC- 2024-0001 Phasing Plan 1 Residential Units 36(a reduction from the original 42 lots) Open Space 1.22 acres/12.72%-Residents will be able to utilize the amenities in the Sky Mesa (Southern Highlands Subdivision). Amenities Swimming pools,with accompanying changing facilities and restroons, and open air ramadas.;tot lot;paved basketball court; sports field; swing set;pedestrian pathways;dog waste stations; multi-use pathway; and a picnic area Physical Features (Waterways,hazards, flood plain,hillside) Acreage 9.59 Lots 44(36 buildable and 8 common) Density 5.51 du/ac City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS& CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. The applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval for this development H-2020- 0030 (AZ, PP); DA Inst. 92020-095243; TED-2022-0002; TECC-2024-0001. 2. Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-8 zoning district. 3. All common driveways shall meet the requirements of 11-6C-2-D including a perpetual ingress/egress easement being filed with the Ada County Recorder, which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. 4. All fencing shall be installed in accordance with UDC 11-3A-7. 5. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11- 3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 6. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 15,UDC 11-313-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 7. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-313-14. 8. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years of the date of approval of the preliminary plat(i.e. June 23, 2026), in accord with UDC 11-6B-7, in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or, a time extension may be requested. 9. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of ACHD. 10. Staff's failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. B. Meridian Public Works SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Water mains need to be on the north and east sides of the roads. 2. Ensure no permanent structures (trees, bushes, buildings, carports, trash receptacle walls, fences, infiltration trenches, light poles, etc.) are not built within the utility easement. 3. Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches. 4. Water lines, fire hydrants and services up the meter require 20' easements. Easement to extend 10' beyond fire hydrant,water meters or termination of the main. GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development.The applicant shall install mains to and through this subdivision; applicant shall coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Department,and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Minimum cover over sewer mains is three feet, if cover from top of pipe to sub-grade is less than three feet than alternate materials shall be used in conformance of City of Meridian Public Works Departments Standard Specifications. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions 2. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. The applicant shall be responsible to install water mains to and through this development, coordinate main size and routing with Public Works. 3. All improvements related to public life,safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 4. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion as set forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 5. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110% will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping,amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 8. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life,non-safety and non-health improvements, prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy, a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 9. Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review, and construction inspection fees, as determined during the plan review process, prior to the issuance of a plan approval letter. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 12. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 13. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 14. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill, where footing would sit atop fill material. 15. The engineer shall be required to certify that the street centerline elevations are set a minimum of 3-feet above the highest established peak groundwater elevation. This is to ensure that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes is at least 1-foot above. 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 17. At the completion of the project, the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 18. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 19. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way(include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat, but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement(on the form available from Public Works), a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, which must include the area of the easement (marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2" x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed, and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 20. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 21. Any wells that will not continue to be used must be properly abandoned according to Idaho Well Construction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resources. The Developer's Engineer shall provide a statement addressing whether there are any existing wells in the development, and if so,how they will continue to be used, or provide record of their abandonment. 22. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8. Contact the Central District Health Department for abandonment procedures and inspections. 23. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6.). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized,the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 24. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions C. Meridian Park's Department I. The project developer shall design and construct multi-use pathways consistent with the location and specifications set forth in the Meridian Pathways Master Plan Map and Master Pathways Plan Document Chapter 3). Any proposed adjustments to pathway alignment shall be coordinated through the Pathways Project Manager unless being constructed by the Ada County Highway District. 2. Prior to final plat approval the applicant shall dedicate a public access easement for a 10' wide, detached multi-use pathway along S. Eagle Rd. for the length of the project frontage. Easements shall be a minimum of 14' wide(10' pathway+2' shoulder each side). All pathways shall be located outside of irrigation district easements unless permission is specifically obtained from the governing irrigation district. Easement need only be dedicated for multi-use pathways that lie outside the public ROW. Use standard City template for public access easement. Submit all easements online through Citizen's Access Portal. NOTE: This pathway requirement was previously noted in PREAPP-2024-0017 (Feb. 2024) which requested a time extension for the Preliminary Plat. 3. Construct multi-use pathways per paving section based on existing site conditions as recommended by project civil engineer in accord with UDC 11-3A-8 and 11-313-12. Prior to final approval the applicant's engineer shall provide written documentation(stamped plans depicting recommended paving section)that the pathway segment was constructed per the recommended specifications. 4. The owner(or representative association)of the property affected by each public access easement shall have an ongoing obligation to maintain the multi-use pathway. 5. 6' high open vision fencing shall be installed between pathways and(live)water irrigation canals and laterals as detailed in the Meridian Pathways Master Plan, Chapter 3,page 3-5. All other fence details per UDC 11-3A-7. 6. Project developer shall be responsible for obtaining license agreement and other permission(s) as required for constructing within irrigation district easements. 7. Should any discrepancy exist between these conditions of approval and the requirements of the irrigation district, the developer shall work with Pathways Project Manager to achieve a pathway design that meets both City and irrigation district objectives. City requirements as stated shall not (nor are they intended to) override those of the irrigation district having jurisdiction over the project area. D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) https://weblink.meridianeity.orQ/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=392134&dbid=#&repo=MeridianCit V E. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) https://weblink.meridianeity.orzlWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=392134&dbid=#&repo MeridianCit V City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions V. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions of approval in Section IV of this staff report. B. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report V. Action ' 1 1 I f - • s A M ct Location 4 of Impact Analysis if _ S t. i �f LAKE HAZEL " t w LU Q !�-i. sue■ r- Lu kill 1 AMITY C Ciiu11111111 /llll _ O j111D��U1111111/' ��pq �-41 � �\IIOI �f�� rll��jWAN,�:,(,1111111 ��y�v1♦♦i♦ �� i�♦i ■■..11■ ,������,♦♦1�����,�i�� If,�:�fi♦♦Gi♦♦i♦i� ��•_I,•,����■�e�♦�♦i♦♦♦ ii li'i=s II 1 Iwo �� rI ICI♦♦jam♦�' 111\��ii Oi♦i♦i G �=::i:I� �i�'.==�u♦♦i�♦ 1►'.�0� ����I�I ♦ 11111 ���♦ ♦ �Itlf��r i�♦�::I I�_ ' r� u1�{.fU11 ■nnq pip•y��I ��■I♦■� ■\■\in/IIIf m��1:Ju1W1al / ■u�p��4i•bi�N� - �.�Inl1 maO■■■■■1 '^'1 1 • ��IIYR:tRYa7sRlYSi91ii731 o-s r'ojil�1 " =z .11�1✓i���II1I1I.III.I1I1I1I I :•■:■.■..U.:��-•.��•�•�,♦•����.■���1,' Jill Mill uj 111 �111 iioi��= -`c� ���1fI ♦ , •� ��i �C� r nnm LAKE HAZEL - � Iiii�l�qi �I���•' '� _ _ Il♦I♦r� ��I milli i W � 1 ��1I 3. Future Land Use Legend ' Project Location ;:;Area of Impact4 "-MU-N Civic O Analysis sity Residential 1� L ' Ttt .-�_`i! , Mediums Density Residential = � EH MU-C MedZighnsity i J J T Residential ' ,lam® 4. Planned Development Map Legend '"--- ---- ' Project Location :.Area of ImpactL T=' City Limits Planned Parcels OAnalysis lffR $W7 ® �' AW ' , City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits 5. Map Notes Nearby Recent Preliminary Plats(within last 5-years) H-2018-0087 H-2019-0119 H-2019-0134 H-2020-0095 H-2021-0020 H-2021-0062 H-2022-0036 H-2023-0051 H-2024-0007 H-2024-0035 H-2024-0044 Nearby Recent Conditional Use Permits(within last 5-years) H-2019-0106 H-2019-0123 H-2020-0009 H-2020-0030 H-2020-0035 H-2020-0064 H-2019-0134 H-2018-0115 H-2020-0057 H-2020-0127 H-2021-0046 H-2021-0087 H-2021-0086 H-2017-0068 H-2018-0043 H-2017-0129 H-2020-0056 H-2018-0017 H-2022-0036 H-2023-0047 H-2023-0050 H-2024-0014 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits B. Preliminary Plat (date: 8/4/2020) LEGEND PRELIMINARY PLAT - McKAY FARM SUBDIVISION 07 ........ 1 --` . 1 r----- -- !! - \• '1' a W ops I I I �1, \ \ Yf; I I ! a ,l - z� ® I ® 8p rn • F ,."' o i ®•—_ �.-- ____ __ a .'I I i€ i e ��` z�@p5�� l , l O1-® 1 A Q e«cl— -- �` a Awl II , P Lu CL City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits C. Final Plat(date: 4/3/2025) Plot Showing Mckay,Farms Subdii ision I Situated in the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 32, Township 3 North,Range 1 East, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ado County, Idaho. 2025 JH ,s 9,hww,+ MI fPN'11'E,IiW l�Vr•w\ 11 s1 Irw.b.r ryas.ms.ww.trs"•+.�..w..�+N��w i) fl b N 230- m Ei J+ "•+wls w o�s r'�`�w.a..rs�..+.w.� tt '�. Is-i J �• �rsQ(ps w�"M�w4w� r`�Y�isr•rlrn ScMa: t' so' Es"rNYmA (Ji IRlm.... �r+n".i.�w�Mrs•.vnr wnr.r.rr ;�5 ]• Yobs ; ---- 9y1J c u...rn®"a_'�YeA iu:rr"..'w r�1..awwrww Lei U .t . W �� w�� "r.rr • Mr..wws.r,i. O ..w srrw(rr u. •r.. rrrW M ww s/ wlann w„r s". -s.sw rr so¢ w u. rm.m� I.♦1I81/Il M1„� Mll'b',s'w,IEW SE IBA r Wr �•�•�•`�� Yw.r q, Y,ralo l,t o�iw ib"i,.w r:n."L:�w•_ a .......� "„ —'----si-4 o t���B n.x.......r�.�......,... 7 ,�F IDAHO J.l-Yw h�KW+'f •""""'"""" x JY�> SURVEY GROUP,LLC City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits D. Landscape Plan(date: Click here to enter a date.) NOTES: - _ --SGiPE REQUIREMENTS: '•' v-.�..._.-..-.. �' ..=...�d MW°-�'- ors_ _ _w•'f'31' �.- r. l�- 10 --- -_-_-• .,` -- D 1— RANT SOHEWIE 0 goq RUN . ' REQUIREMENTS: •h.• IV tHCIkL� _ MIR Mi. i STREETS �_—...i...-�e•..� '� ,—� RANT SLHEdILE y ..v r .i _----_ _ u PIAH.METI ---------- --- ----- --- ---------------- —L101 t City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits ---------- --- - _ --- ---e----_---_- 24, rtFr�.f�5i *�Stiw.Y: — L --SCNEDULE N —� K »ax QQQ U -- LMDS—E fIAN.-2 e e e e- ®'1l1I"1S1 4 L102 L -- -""eta......... .r.�. ' .W xw�vrKF�r= _ . r �SNil9 PUNTING � r. YUNIER ISIANO DEigIL � STEEL IANOSCMEEDGMG _L_au—————____ ------------- i i i ie La.s.. L...eer ��\tpgNSF 6'CLOSED NSION FENCE T'DPENVISIONFENCE h� Y F V ' rl� cniNEWIASs�E etFiicluk€ uNDsuPE DEraLs ......... —— L150 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits E. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 4/3l2025) I I I I ® to o ® I © o I � O > o w i �+ E.KWHIMN ST O LU w LU a s ® ' ® I © l a ----- r W � o I U � I rl a � I , o E.1M1eNON T '! , o it o raaz�n uarvwia� City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits F. Amenity Detail Exhibit POOL BATH ROOMS/ CHANGING AREA OPEN AIR RAMADA ^Q!��-; �" w.�. -w--1 � POOL BATHROOMS/ CHANGING AREA OPEN AIR RAMADA 4 • a City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits FULL COURT BASKETBALL COURT A Z B ELD ' BALL FIELD City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits . . SWINGSFT City ti 7- �.� rz:� �r b:f.R�6' N LS$. � �,.�� ;.•-s"t r. c,- f"� �.2-� � Z - `.+., F�F 1 MeridianDepartment Re 1 1Exhibits DOG WASTE STATIONS (8) • fyV 1.' �K i �i 1 - COVERED PICNIC SHELTER " City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits A, M, to v; J b � •��� �� � -,,��,���jJi#�� ti am Y j r.- ., y,r City of Meridian Department Report G. Emergency Access Exhibit �E IN FEET f f .. f I � 1EAnvAxEBRiMo9 I 1 f ENERGENCYACME fl ii I ! E RENNIq(S1REEf RBBONaiio I 1 I 1 i t I t IT MCKAY SUBDIVISION TREASURE VALLEY MERIDIAN,IDAHO CIVIL AND DESIGN EMERGENCY ACCESS EXHIBIT \EMERGENGY ACCESS CROSS SICnoN_r �* 19 MARCH 2O25 ++s :S F City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits H. Building Elevations (date: Click here to enter a date.) rw - 1 r lIIIR i!P Y• •K. 1 1 City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits i n� City of Meridian Department Report VI. Exhibits 1. Common Drive Exhibit 1 1 i r----T----i r---- --- 1 I � i� tgir3s a� a �i L-___ r---- ----� r----.----� sxr u:sA I �I I I i ♦ I 3Y ,r G ?( 9 VIII FE} 4 —————————— 9 —1 r_--- 1 --- �+3 1 1 i `I 3O I I —'—'— —'—•—•—•—'—'— ., —'—'—•—'—-—'—'—-—'— —•_•a—._. MCKAY SUBDIVISION TREASURE VALLEY MERIDIAN,IDAHO 0 10. ;i CIVIL AND DESIGN SHARED DRIVE EXHIBIT S EIN FEET � I B MARCH 2O25 a 8 City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits J. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S1132417211 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 25 16th Percentile Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time 5-9 min. YELLOW Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets Arterial Road Buildout Status YELLOW plan) > existing (# of lanes) & road IS in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving (existing or future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Exhibits VII. ADDITIONAL NOTES& DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS, TABLES, AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days. Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0 (i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development, government, and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2< 5.0; R-4<2.0; R-S < 1.0; R-15 <0.5; R-40 <0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous,and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan(e.g. pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size, configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources,including sewer main lines,sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service (LOS). LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F. Letter A represents free flow conditions, and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D,stable flow, to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians, nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Development Agreement (Summerlin West Subdivision H-2024-0023) Between City of Meridian and Lansing Farms LLC and Open Door Rentals LLC for Property Generally Located on the East Side of S. Locust Grove Rd. Between E. Lake Hazel Rd. and E. Columbia Rd. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034474 Boise,Idaho Pgs=64 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Lansing Farms LLC, Owner/Developer 3. Open Door Rentals LLC, Owner/Developer THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement), is made and entered into this 3rd day of June 2025,by and between City of Meridian,a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, hereafter called CITY, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642; and Lansing Farms LLC, whose address is 1979 N. Locust Grove Road, Meridian Idaho 83646; and Open Door Rentals LLC, whose address is 1977 E. Overland Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642; hereinafter collectively called OWNER/DEVELOPER. l. RECITALS: 1.1 WHEREAS, Owner is the sole owner, in law and/or equity, of certain tract of land in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full, herein after referred to as the Property; and 1.2 WHEREAS, Idaho Code § 67-6511 A provides that cities may, by ordinance, require or permit as a condition of zoning that the Owner and/or Developer make a written commitment concerning the use or development of the subject Property; and 1.3 WHEREAS, City has exercised its statutory authority by the enactment of Section 11-5B-3 of the Unified Development Code("UDC"),which authorizes development agreements upon the annexation and/or re-zoning of land; and 1.4 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer have submitted an application for annexation and zoning of 63.965 acres of land with a request for the R-8(Medium-Density Residential)(17.27 acres)zoning district and the R-15 (Medium High-Density) (46.69 acres)zoning district on the property as shown in Exhibit"A"under the Unified Development Code, which generally describes how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.5 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer made representations at the public hearings before Planning and Zoning Commission and the Meridian City Council as to how the Property will be developed and what improvements will be made; and 1.6 WHEREAS, the record of the proceedings for requested annexation and zoning held before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council includes responses of government subdivisions providing services within the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction and includes further testimony and comment; and DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—SUMMERLIN WEST SUBE)WISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE I OF 8 1.7 WHEREAS, on the 7th day of January, 2025, the Meridian City Council approved certain Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Decision and Order ("Findings"), which have been incorporated into this Agreement and attached as Exhibit`B"; and 1.8 WHEREAS, the Findings require the Owner/Developer to enter into a Development Agreement before the City Council takes final action on final plat; and 1.9 WHEREAS, Owner/Developer deem it to be in its best interest to be able to enter into this Agreement and acknowledges that this Agreement was entered into voluntarily and at its urging and request; and 1.10 WHEREAS, City requires the Owner/Developer to enter into a development agreement for the purpose of ensuring the Property is developed and the subsequent use of the Property is in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,herein being established as a result of evidence received by the City in the proceedings for zoning designation from government subdivisions providing services within the planning jurisdiction and from affected property owners and to ensure zoning designation is in accordance with the amended Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian on December 19, 2019, Resolution No. 19-2179, and the UDC, Title 11. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 2. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: That the above recitals are contractual and binding and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 3. DEFINITIONS: For all purposes of this Agreement the following words, terms, and phrases herein contained in this section shall be defined and interpreted as herein provided for,unless the clear context of the presentation of the same requires otherwise: 3.1 CITY: means and refers to the City of Meridian, a party to this Agreement, which is a municipal corporation and government subdivision of the state of Idaho, organized and existing by virtue of law of the State of Idaho, whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 3.2 OWNER/DEVELOPER: means and refers to Lansing Farms LLC, whose address is 1979 N. Locust Grove Road, Meridian, ID, 83646; and Open Door Rentals LLC, whose address is 1977 E. Overland Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642; hereinafter collectively called OWNER/DEVELOPER, the parties that own and are developing said Property and shall include any subsequent owner(s)/developer(s) of the Property. 3.3 PROPERTY: means and refers to that certain parcel(s) of Property located in the County of Ada, City of Meridian as in Exhibit "A" describing a parcel to bound by this Development Agreement and attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth at length. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE 2 OF 8 4. USES PERMITTED BY THIS AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall vest the right to develop the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.1 The uses allowed pursuant to this Agreement are only those uses allowed under the UDC. 4.2 No change in the uses specified in this Agreement shall be allowed without modification of this Agreement. 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5.1. Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan, phasing plan, and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section IV of the Staff Report attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law attached hereto as Exhibit `B" and the provisions contained herein. b. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures that face S. Locust Grove, S. Barchetta Avenue, and Summerlin Drive prior to S. Steeple Avenue shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g., projections, recesses, step-backs, pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 6. APPROVAL PERIOD: If this Agreement has not been fully executed within six(6) months after the date of the Findings, the City may,at its sole discretion, declare the Agreement null and void. 7. DEFAULT/CONSENT TO DE-ANNEXATION AND REVERSAL OF ZONING DESIGNATION: 7.1 Acts of Default.In the event Owner/Developer,or Owner/Developer's heirs,successors, assigns, or subsequent owners of the Property or any other person acquiring an interest in the Property, fail to faithfully comply with all of the terms and conditions included in this Agreement in connection with the Property, this Agreement may be terminated by the City upon compliance with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7.2 Notice and Cure Period. In the event of Owner/Developer's default of this agreement, Owner/Developer shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice from City to initiate commencement of action to correct the breach and cure the default,which action must be prosecuted with diligence and completed within one hundred eighty (180) days; provided, however, that in the case of any such default that cannot with diligence be cured within such one hundred eighty(180)day period, then the time allowed to cure such failure may be extended for such period as may be necessary to complete the curing of the same with diligence and continuity. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE 3 OF 8 7.3 Remedies. In the event of default by Owner/Developer that is not cured after notice from City as described in Section 7.2, City shall, upon satisfaction of the notice and hearing procedures set forth in Idaho Code section 67-6511A, have the right, but not a duty, to de-annex all or a portion of the Property, reverse the zoning designations described herein, and terminate City services to the de-annexed Property, including water service and/or sewer service. Further, City shall have the right to file an action at law or in equity to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. Because the covenants, agreements, conditions, and obligations contained herein are unique to the Property and integral to City's decision to annex and/or re-zone the Property, City and Owner/Developer stipulate that specific performance is an appropriate, but not exclusive, remedy in the event of default. Owner/Developer reserves all rights to contest whether a default has occurred. 7.4 Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereto shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, including all matters of construction, validity, performance, and enforcement. Any action brought by any party hereto shall be brought within Ada County, Idaho. 7.5 Delay. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by either Owner/Developer or City is delayed for causes that are beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance, which shall include, without limitation, acts of civil disobedience, strikes or similar causes, the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. 7.6 Waiver. A waiver by City of any default by Owner/Developer of any one or more of the covenants or conditions hereof shall apply solely to the default and defaults waived and shall neither bar any other rights or remedies of City nor apply to any subsequent default of any such or other covenants and conditions. 8. INSPECTION: Owner/Developer shall,immediately upon completion of any portion or the entirety of said development of the Property as required by this Agreement or by City ordinance or policy, notify the City Engineer and request the City Engineer's inspections and written approval of such completed improvements or portion thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all other ordinances of the City that apply to said Property. 9. REQUIREMENT FOR RECORDATION: City shall record this Agreement, including all of the Exhibits, and submit proof of such recording to Owner/Developer, prior to the third reading of the Meridian Zoning Ordinance in connection with the rezoning of the Property by the City Council. If for any reason after such recordation,the City Council fails to adopt the ordinance in connection with the annexation and zoning of the Property contemplated hereby, the City shall execute and record an appropriate instrument of release of this Agreement. 10. ZONING: City shall, following recordation of the duly approved Agreement, enact a valid and binding ordinance zoning the Property as specified herein. 11. SURETY OF PERFORMANCE: The City may also require surety bonds, irrevocable letters of credit, cash deposits, certified check or negotiable bonds, as allowed under the UDC, to insure the installation of required improvements, which the Owner/Developer agree to provide, if required by the City. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE 4 OF 8 12. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued in any phase in which the improvements have not been installed, completed, and accepted by the City, or sufficient surety of performance is provided by Owner/Developer to the City in accordance with Paragraph 11 above. 13. ABIDE BY ALL CITY ORDINANCES: That Owner/Developer agree to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian unless otherwise provided by this Agreement. 14. NOTICES: Any notice desired by the parties and/or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered if and when personally delivered or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: CITY: with copy to: City Clerk City Attorney City of Meridian City of Meridian 33 E. Broadway Ave. 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Lansing Farms LLC Open Door Rentals LLC 1979 N. Locust Grove Road 1977 E. Overland Road Meridian, Idaho 83646 Meridian, Idaho 83642 14.1 A party shall have the right to change its address by delivering to the other party a written notification thereof in accordance with the requirements of this section. 15. ATTORNEY FEES: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorney's fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default,termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 16. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of and a default under this Agreement by the other party so failing to perform. 17. BINDING UPON SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Agreement shall be binding on the Owner/Developer, each subsequent owner and any other person acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation shall be subject to the provisions hereof and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees,upon written request of Owner and/or Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Agreement if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner and/or Developer have fully performed their obligations under this Agreement. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE 5 OF 8 18. INVALID PROVISION: If any provision of this Agreement is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Agreement and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 19. DUTY TO ACT REASONABLY: Unless otherwise expressly provided, each party shall act reasonably in giving any consent,approval,or taking any other action under this Agreement. 20. REMOVED PROPERTY: The City is hereby authorized, in its sole discretion, to remove a portion of the Property ("Removed Property") from this Agreement at any time, provided that the City and the owner of the Removed Property concurrently enter into a modified development agreement governing the development and use of the Removed Property. The remaining portion of the Property, which has not been removed from this Agreement as described above, shall continue to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. 21. COOPERATION OF THE PARTIES: In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision in this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate in defending such action or proceeding. 22. FINAL AGREEMENT: This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, condition and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or understanding, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. 22.1 No condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing rezoning of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended without the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 23. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. [end of text; acknowledgements, signatures and Exhibits A and B follow] DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE 6 OF 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have herein executed this agreement and made it effective as hereinabove provided. OWNER/DEVELOPER: Lansing Farms LLC • G�rs�� �lolw� Its: e,- State of Idaho ) ss: County of Ada ) On this d— y of n ,2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared , known or identified to me to be the _ d_ of Lansing Farms LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the game. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and ffixed my official seal e day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL ) .•GQ►�.•••"'•••,r��i, Notary Public n r �• ��t1pTAR 1,•� '•. My Commission Expires: o SoPUB C� OWNER/DEVELOPEI, •* • Open Door LLC0•.,� .;No �010 set 11*11 By: - Its: fY1 State of Idaho ) ss: County of Ada ) On this#2'rk ay of 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Not a� Public in and for said State, personally appeared known or identified to me to be the e"., of Open Door Rentals LLC andQhe person who signed above and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand an ffixed my official s the day and year in this certificate first above written.,,,,p,Isotope,�, (SEf ') ••••SOT •••��t,'., Notary Public �y _ T� ARrR My Commission Expires: 11 �l-�(o • • _-- r A So UBL1C,�^�� DEVELOPMENT AGREEFOI�L '+ �ygn��+�@�t �4 SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE 7 OF 8 ",'Iloilo Or 1D ,,,, CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-3-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 State of Idaho ) ss County of Ada ) On this 3rd day of June , 2025, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION(H-2024-0023) PAGE 8 OF 8 EXHIBIT A A Description for Annexation Summerlin Subdivision June 12, 2024 All of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 5 and 6 bears, North 00004'42" West, 2655.92 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 5, North 00004'42" West, 873.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, North 00004'42" West, 1,138.85 feet to the westerly prolongation of the southerly boundary line of Rescue Ranch Subdivision as filed in Book 106 of Plats at Pages 14734 through 14736, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said west boundary line on said southerly boundary line and the westerly prolongation thereof the following seven (7) courses and distances: South 89°52'36" East, 696.77 feet; South 68053'16" East, 332.83 feet; South 31°36'40" East, 154.12 feet; South 64034'41" East, 290.61 feet; South 48018'53" East, 155.34 feet; North 00004'42" West, 535.82 feet; South 89052'36" East, 1,192.35 feet to the Southeast corner of said Rescue Ranch Subdivision; thence on the north-south centerline of said Section 5, South 00°00'59" West, 1,081.82 feet to the Northeast corner of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5672 and 5673, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said north-south centerline on the northerly boundary line of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision the following seven (7) courses and �NpNL LAND - distances: ENSF sG�` North 61°46'52" West, 361.44 feet; 1 779 South 82033'31"West, 182.68 feet; 0 ) tZII&z O� F OF North 66°56'01" West, 362.91 feet; YM MCCIX Page 1 of 2 314.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 267.40 feet, a central angle of 67017'03", and a long chord which bears South 79025'27" West, 296.28 feet; South 45046'56" West, 829.67 feet; South 57°24'55" West, 143.12 feet; South 67027'28" West, 176.39 feet to the Northwest corner of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, coincident with the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 1 of said Laredo Estates Subdivision; thence leaving the northerly boundary of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision on the northerly boundary line of said Lot 4 and the westerly prolongation thereof the following three (3) courses and distances: North 87°28'39" West, 78.00 feet; North 59023'39" West, 474.00 feet; North 51°21'39" West, 214.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 63.965 acres, more or less. End of Description. SN�NPL L A��S NSF G� k < 11779 4, 1 z/z0zC O� FOF \� Q�� YM MC , Page 2 of 2 1/4 C1/4 S.5 S.6 S.5 — -- — — — — --- ' w Rescue o� Ranch Sub. I 0 0 p 'n o v Z S89'52'36"E 1192.35' S89'52'36"E 696.77' S6 . vo 33 6" 3 • 2 8`3 N N �! 00 S64 34 47'� z In ?90 6�, o rn U) -o C2 3 C U) in >` y N o °ro° 63.965 Acres o m o O N ., o EQ C1 362 `n v) 0 N66in -i S6,91' O vi o� p '�' L3 H 3,67 m O 67 Z Point of ocG `Lc', � ss?ly Beginning o�`'�1-* O In NSgg�g pp, Tamarack I 2339„ gyp, Ridge Sub. L6 �n o °O Lot 4, Block 1 Line Table i o Laredo Estates Sub. I o Line Bearing Length ' I L1 S31'36'40"E 154.12' S.6 S.5 _ _ _ L2 S48'18'53"E 155.34' _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ 1/4--,.S.5 S.8 S.7 S.8 W. Columbia Rd. L3 S82'33'31"W 182.68' O L4 S57'24'55"W 143.12' NNL LAH�g��\DENS cS' L5 S67'27'28"W 176.39' L6 N87'28'39"W 78.00' a 11779 ;a L7 N51'21'39"W 214.44' O� FOF \� �? Curve Table YM McCAM� Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chord Length N Scale: 1"=400' C1 314.02' 267.40' 67'17'03" S79'25'27"W 296.28' P,\Summerlin Sub(Lonsing Forms) 22-285\dwg\Annex Ex.dwq 6/12/2024 4:19:37 PM 100 200 400 800 Exhibit Drawing for Job No. I DAHO Annexation 22-285 sS EMERALD Summerlin Subdivsion Sheet No. SURVEY eOIOISE.IDAH083704 (208)846-8570 All of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted GROUP, LLC portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., RAE., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Date 6/1212/2024 A Description for R-15 Zone Summerlin Subdivision June 12, 2024 A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, T.2N., R.1 E., B.M., from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 5 and 6 bears, North 00°04'42" West, 2655.92 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 5, North 00004'42" West, 922.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, North 00004'42" West, 1,019.22 feet to the westerly prolongation of the southerly boundary line of Rescue Ranch Subdivision as filed in Book 106 of Plats at Pages 14734 through 14736, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said west boundary line on said southerly boundary line and the westerly prolongation thereof the following seven (7) courses and distances: South 89052'36" East, 696.77 feet; South 6805316" East, 332.83 feet; South 31°36'40" East, 154.12 feet; South 64034'41" East, 290.61 feet; South 48018'53" East, 155.34 feet; North 00004'42" West, 535.82 feet; South 89052'36" East, 1,192.35 feet to the Southeast corner of said Rescue Ranch Subdivision; thence on the north-south centerline of said Section 5, South 00000,59" West, 1,081.82 feet to the Northeast corner of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5672 and 5673, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said north-south centerline on the northerly boundary line of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, North 61°46'52" West, 206.38 feet; S�ONPL LANp S �'"✓- E N S G thence leaving said northerly boundary line, North 00000'59" East, 293.70 feet; 779 0 o F YM M CC P�`� Page 1 of 2 thence 49.17 feet on the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 56020'46", and a long chord which bears South 61°50'35" West, 47.21 feet; thence North 89059'01" West, 261.29 feet; thence 120.69 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 23003'00", and a long chord which bears North 78027'31" West, 119.88 feet; thence North 66056'01" West, 170.73 feet; thence 554.28 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 472.00 feet, a central angle of 67'17'03", and a long chord which bears South 79025'27"West, 522.98 feet; thence South 45046'56" West, 378.17 feet; thence North 44013'04" West, 22.00 feet; thence South 74°55'59" West, 195.03 feet; thence South 45046'56" West, 8.74 feet; thence South 89055'18" West, 671.73 feet; thence North 45004'42"West, 11.31 feet; thence South 89°55'18" West, 37.00 feet; thence South 00004'42" East, 35.65 feet; thence 20.44 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 11 042'50", and a long chord which bears South 05056'07" East, 20.41 feet; thence South 89055'18" West, 187.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 46.691 acres, more or less. End of Description. ENS O`S61 o� V 1 779 O F p F �yM. M Cc 1/4 C1/4 S.5 S.6 . S.5 --i` • I w Rescue 0 rn Ranch Sub. cO 00 o ri 00 0 I � to 0 c z • v S89'52'36"E 1192.35' S895236E 696.77' ' " ' 86 vo 33 s3,t6" 3 UJI N (V �l 00 564:34• 0 LO oNo. iv 290 F z 6 00 Q' 'n /�? 3 cV o (D > 0 o ±46.691 Acres °' (V cv 0 r C3 L 46 P a] C2 L5 C1 0 p C V) to 0 J U) 0 J L12 m 0 vi L13 L11 0 0� L9 GOKI ? S89'55'18"W 671.73' L8 c 43 L14 C4 L10 • �o Point of Beginning I I 0 I I u) I TamaTack I Ridge Sub. to 3 N 0) � In - O Lot 4, Block 1 I P O LaTedo Estates Sub. I 0 S.6. S.5 — 1/4 S.5 S.7 S.8 W. Columbia Rd. _ S.8 P` LAND See Sheet 2 for Line \GENS and Curve Tables 1 779 N NAG IZ�o��o C� 9 Scale: 1"=400' OO F pF 0 100 200 400 80o YM MCCPN`� P:\Summerlln Sub (Lonsing Forms)22-285\dwg\R-15 E..dwg 6/12/2024 5;22.11 PM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. IDAHO R-15 Zone 22-285 SURVEY 9955W EMERALDAHO83704 BOISE,IDAH083704 Summerlln Subdivsion Sheet No.(208)846.8570 GROUP LLC A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted 1 of 2 0 ld portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., R.1E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Dwg. Date 6/12/2024 Line Table Curve Table gS��N GE NAho G F 0 11779 cl�(� `IP�O V p FOF �p p� oyM MCC PN`� P:\Summed:.Sub (Lonsinq Forms) 22-285\dwg\R-15 E.Ad 6/12/2024 6:01:11 PM Exhibit Drawing for BOSS .IDAHO ALD 83704 Summerlin Subdivsion BOISE.IDAHO 83704 (208)846.8570 2 of 2 A Description for R-8 Zone Summerlin Subdivision June 12, 2024 A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 1 East, Boise-Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8, T.2N., R.1 E., B.M., from which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 5 and 6 bears, North 00004'42" West, 2655.92 feet; thence on the west boundary line of said Section 5, North 00004'42" West, 873.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing, North 00004'42" West, 119.63 feet; thence leaving said west boundary line, North 89055'18" East, 187.58 feet; thence 20.44 feet on the arc of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 11 042'50", and a long chord which bears North 05056'07" West, 20.41 feet; thence North 00004'42" West, 35.65 feet; thence North 89055'18" East, 37.00 feet; thence South 45004'42" East, 11.31 feet; thence North 89055'18" East, 671.73 feet; thence North 45046'56" East, 8.74 feet; thence North 74055'59" East, 195.03 feet; thence South 440 13'04" East, 22.00 feet; thence North 45046'56" East, 378.17 feet; thence 554.28 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 472.00 feet, a central angle of 67017'03", and a long chord which bears North 79°25'27" East, 522.98 feet; thence South 66056'01" East, 170.73 feet; �r1PL LANp �\ \GENS� thence 120.69 feet on the arc of a curve to the c� left having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of O 11779 23003'00", and a long chord which bears South Nq 177 Pao 78027'31" East, 119.88 feet; 0 TF o F \' YM MccPM� Page 1 of 2 thence South 89059'01" East, 261.29 feet; thence 49.17 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 56°20'46", and a long chord which bears North 61°50'35" East, 47.21 feet; thence South 00000'59" West, 293.70 feet to the northerly boundary line of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5672 and 5673, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on said northerly boundary line the following seven (7) courses and distances: North 61°46'52" West, 155.06 feet; South 82033'31" West, 182.68 feet; North 66056'01" West, 362.91 feet; 314.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 267.40 feet, a central angle of 67017'03", and a long chord which bears South 79025'27" West, 296.28 feet; South 45046'56" West, 829.67 feet; South 57024'55" West, 143.12 feet; South 67027'28" West, 176.39 feet to the Northwest corner of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, coincident with the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 1 of said Laredo Estates Subdivision; thence leaving the northerly boundary of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision on the northerly boundary line of said Lot 4 and the westerly prolongation thereof the following three (3) courses and distances: North 87028'39" West, 78.00 feet; North 59023'39" West, 474.00 feet; North 51°21'39" West, 214.44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 17.274 acres, more or less. End of Description. N GENsFp 11779 O TF OF McCk Page 2 of 2 1 4 C1/4 S.5 S.6 : S.5 Rescue Ranch. Sub. : I c • v �O { VO t0 c0 Ir N I U) I C Lo W C2 v (D 0 4g C4 D N 0 C3 L10 m � � o N _ rn � o I L3 �� C5 iys�6?.g�. cn O -1 L4 s6'p7,• Ib 00 vi L2 N89'55'18"E 671.73' L6 0�0\ ,1 k' L13 Z L7 �G ��6 L1 C1 L5 /0�y0 �0 119.63' ±17.274 Acres/ ,t.1b ' 4 Tamarack 2339„ �1ik Ridge Sub. L16 r� 00 Lot 4, block 1 Laredo Estates Sub. . I ' I S.6 S.5 _ - _ _ _ - _ - - - - 1/ S.7 S.8 W. Columbia Rd. •S.8 LAH� See Sheet 2 for Line �5 \01 and Curve Tables 1 779 N 0 Scale: 1"=400' OO F OF O� 0 100 200 400 800 YM McCPN`� P:\Summerlin Sub(Lansing Farms) 22-285\dwg\R-8 Ex.dwg 5/12/2024 5-39:00 PM Exhibit Drawing for Job No. IDAHO R-8 Zone 22-285 SURVEY 9955 W.OSE,IDMERA3704LD Summerlin Subdivision Sheet No. BOISE,IDAH083704 � Of(206)846.8570 IN GROUP LLC A portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision and unplatted portions of the SW1/4 of Section 5, T.2N., R. E., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. Dwg. Date 6/12/2024 Line Table Curve Table OVAL LAH� > ... 7 �\ �GENS �G 1 779 0 rz/z,0 z 0 O� F p F YM MCC PN`� P:\SummerIm Sub(lonsing Forms) 22-285\dwg\R-8 EK.dwg 6/12/2024 5:54:51 PM Exhibit Drawing for IDAHO R-8 Zone SURVEY 9955E AHO83704 Surnrnerlln Subdivsion BOIS E 4 DAHO 83704 (208)846-8570 GROUP, LLC EXHIBIT B CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW aWE Nty AND DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of the Request for annexation and preliminary plat, by Laren Bailey, Conger Group. Case No(s). H-2024-0023 For the City Council Hearing Date of: December 17, 2024(Findings on January 7, 2025) A. Findings of Fact l. Hearing Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 17, 2024, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 17, 2024, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 17, 2024, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 17, 2024, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 1 I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has, by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 1 1-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of December 17, 2024, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION-H-2024-0023) - I - be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for annexation and preliminary plat is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of December 17, 2024, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2) years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2) years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions, the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension, the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit, when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval,and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with I I-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two (2)year period. Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION-H-2024-0023) -2- City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-6F). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may, within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted,including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of December 17, 2024 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION-H-2024-0023) -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 7th day of January 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert . Si ison 1-7-2025 Attest: IDIAN � SEAL Chris Johns(in" Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. 1-7-2025 By: ���� .. ... ,. Datcd: City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(SUMMERLIN WEST SUBDIVISION-H-2024-0023) -4- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �E DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT HEARING 12/17/2024 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council Area of Impact is City Limits f FROM: Linda Ritter, Associate Planner Q Analysis 208-884-5533 I lritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Laren Bailey,Conger Group - SUBJECT: H-2024-0023 Summerlin West Subdivision AZ, PP LOCATION: Located in the NW '/4 of the SW '/4 of Section 5,Township 2N, Range 1 E, parcels: R5147110200, R5147110324, R5147110342 and S 1405315235 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary An annexation with zoning from RUT (Rural Urban Transition)to R-8 (medium density)and R-15 (medium-high density)and a preliminary plat application to allow for the development of a 367-lot subdivision consisting of 337 residential building lots and 28 common lots on 63.17-acres. B. Issues/Waivers • Kuna School District states they cannot serve the proposed development because the proposed plats in this zone are beyond district capacity. This proposed development will impact Silver Trail Elementary, Fremont Middle School, Kuna High School and Swan Falls High School zones which are already at or over capacity with the current enrollment. • Waiver for Block Face Length per UDC 11-6C-3F for E. Crimson Clover Drive exceeding the maximum requirement of 1,200 feet. • Waiver to keep the Rawson Canal open per UDC 11-3A-6. • Access management and potential impacts due to the close proximity of the private road (E. Cavalli Lane)to the proposed public road(Summerlin Drive). Staff feels the applicant and the adjacent property owner should coordinate to develop a shared access solution. C. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and preliminary plat per the conditions of approval included in Section IV in accord accordance with Findings in Section V. D. Decision Approved with Conditions City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Rural Urban Transition(RUT) Proposed Land Use(s) Single-Family Residential Existing Zoning RUT Proposed Zoning R-8 and R-15 Adopted FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential,Low Density Residential Proposed FLUM Designation Medium Density Residential,Low Density Residential Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 5/28/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 5/23/2024 Site posting date 10/28/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.G • Comments Received Yes,Staff Report - • Commission Action Required No - • Access S.Locust Grove Road - • Traffic Level of Service E - ITD Comments Received Yes,Letter IV.H Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline 900 fl:from property line • Impacts or Concerns • Sewer not yet available to site. Closest available sewer is 900 ft from property line • Must provide to and through to R8315200020 Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline 890'from existing water main however Hadler Subdivision would bring it within 70'once constructed. • Impacts or Concerns • Engineer to verify if there is a well onsite.If a well is located on the site it must be abandoned per regulatory requirements and proof of abandonment must be provided to the City. • Developer of Rescue Ranch has discuss running a water main down E Cavalli Ln with the City. Work with the developer of Rescue Ranch on water mains location.The City will not allow parallel water lines. So either: A. The water line is constructed in E Cavalli Ln and you tie into it;or B. The main gets constructed in Summerlin Drive and you provide an easement and stub to the property boundary. - Only phase 1 as shown in the phasing plan can be constructed with a single connection to the City's existing water infrastructure. A second connection(looping)is required before additional Phases will be approved. - If a road to the south is required provide a water main stub to the southern boundary. - Main down Locust Grove needs to be 12". City of Meridian Department Report II. Community Metrics School District(s) Kuna School District IVY • Capacity of Schools Silver Trail Elementary—At or over capacity - Fremont Middle School—At or over capacity Kuna High School—At or over capacity Swan Falls High School—At or over capacity • Number of Students Enrolled Silver Trail Elementary—At or over capacity -. Fremont Middle School—At or over capacity Kuna High School—At or over capacity Swan Falls High School—At or over capacity Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Summerlin West AZ,PP H-2024-0023 (copy this link into a separate browser). Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existiny-Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:R5147110200 Date Retrieved:2024/ 10/22 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 325 1,268 Surrounding Area 56% Not city 4699 4D 0 City Limits 989.4 ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:116.2% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family Multi-family is 0% 2%� is 0 Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed I I I Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 2000 4000 6000 0 10 20 30 40 ■ Single-family Multi-family City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics 2.00 500 Single-family H Residential' 1.50 Parcel Diversity y 1.00 ® u° 0Parcel Count 0.50 0.67 m in 0.41 10 a Average Acres 0.00 —ram 15psi 0 R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 10.00 09.36Residential Net Density O 6.59 i 5.00 ��VO O 1.49 O 2.42 o.00 Dwelling Units / Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Notes: See VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. Figure 2: ACHD Summary Metrics Q Locust Grove Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes m NotableExisting Levellof Service a (Primary roadway impact) L= Programmed IFYP Programmed CIP Notes: See VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables, and Charts. Fil4ure 3: Service Impact Summary IL Ready Marginal Q Caution 0 —' Notes: See VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics IIi. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview This property is designated Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential on the City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The medium density residential designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three (3) to eight(8) dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The low density residential designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three (3) dwelling units or less per acre. These areas often transition between existing rural residential and urban properties. Developments need to respect agricultural heritage and resources, recognize view sheds and open spaces, and maintain or improve the overall atmosphere of the area. The use of open spaces,parks, trails, and other appropriate means should enhance the character of the area. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The proposed density for the 17.274 acres of land for the R-8 zoning district equates to 2.95 du/ac and 6.12 du/ac for the 46.691 acres proposed for R-15 zoning. The applicant states the proposed project has an overall gross density of 5.37 du/ac, meeting the rewired density range listed above. Stafffinds the proposed preliminary plat and requested R-8 and R-15 zoning districts to be generally consistent with the Future Land Use Map designation for medium and low density residential. The R-15 zoning designation, which allows for reduced lot sizes down to 2,000 square feet, provides flexibility for developers to support a diversity and variety of housing types. This can create a dynamic, multi-generational community where residents can transition through different stages of life(known as aging in place) while remaining in the same neighborhood. This type of zoning in conjunction with other designations should be used to support a diverse housing mix that supports long-term residency and continuity within the community,promoting stability and a sense of place for residents throughout different stages of life. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.01.01 encourages diverse housing options suitable for various income levels, household sizes and lifestyle preferences. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 G states development should avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City. Therefore, staff recommends the applicant provide a mix of dwelling type such as single family attached or townhomes within Block 2 (lots 2-12), Block 3 (lots 2-20), and Block 4 (lots 2-20) of the proposed development as supported by the Comprehensive Plan within the R-15 zoning district. The City may rewire a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. To ensure the site develops as proposed with this application, staff recommends a DA as a provision of annexation with the provisions included in Section IV. The DA is rewired to be signed by the property owner(s)/developer and returned to the City within six(6)months of the Council granting the annexation for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History Laredo Estates Subdivision Lots 2 and 3 Phasing Plan 6 Phases Residential Units 336 Single-family detached Open Space 15%required/24.36%and 15.39 acres provided Amenities Swimming pool facility,playground,picnic gazebo,pathways,tot lot, plaza sitting area and dog parks Physical Features Rawson Canal Acreage 63.17 acres Lots 367 lots(337 residential,25 open space and 3 common driveways) Density 6.12 du/acre(R-15)2.95 du/acre(R-8)overall 5.37 du/acre B. History The property resides within Ada County and is zoned RUT. Parcels R5147110200,R5147110324 and R5147110342 were originally part of the Laredo Estates Subdivision Lots 2 and 3. Lot 3 was later subdivided into two lots. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The current use of the property is agricultural with one (1) residential property existing. The existing structure will be removed and the existing well and septic system will need to be abandoned as required. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (Comp Plan 2.01.02C, Comp Plan 2.06.01 G, Comp Plan 2.06.02D, UDC 11-2): The applicant is proposing single-family detached homes which are listed as a principal permitted use in UDC Table 11-2A-2 for the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts. Staff is recommending the applicant provide a mix of dwelling types within the residential area such as single family attached, or townhomes as supported by the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose statement of the UDC within the R-15 zoning district. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. To support this policy staff recommends the applicant provide additional housing options (i.e. townhomes, single family attached) in the development. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 G states development should avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area;provide for diverse housing types throughout the City. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.06.02D encourages a diversity of housing, recreation, and mobility options to attract and sustain the local workforce. The Comprehensive Plan states the location and balance of land uses and densities should efficient and sustainable; enhance community identity; support a multimodal transportation network;provide housing choices near jobs, schools, shops, and parks; minimize conflicts between incompatible uses; and integrate development with existing and planned infrastructure. The Comprehensive Plan was updated to support a diversity of housing types for all income groups. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The preliminary plat and future development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 and l 1-2A-7 for the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts. City of Meridian i Department Report III. Staff Analysis All proposed lots and public streets appear to meet UDC dimensional standards per the submitted preliminary plat. This includes minimum lot sizes of 2,000 -4,000 sq. ft. and required street frontages of at least forty (40) feet. The subdivision is proposed to develop in six(6)phases as depicted in Exhibit VII J,Figure 3. Development of the subdivision is required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC I I- 6C-3. Although the R-8 zoning meets the requirements of three (3) or less dwelling units per acre, it does not meet the intent of the low density residential FLUM designation as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Low Density Residential allows for the development of single-family homes on large and estate lots at gross densities of three dwelling units or less per acre. These areas often transition between existing rural residential and urban properties. Developments need to respect agricultural heritage and resources,recognize view sheds and open spaces, and maintain or improve the overall atmosphere of the area. The use of open spaces,parks, trails,and other appropriate means should enhance the character of the area. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. Staffs recommendation is to sh ft from an R-8 zoning designation to an R-2 or R-4 zoning with larger lot sizes (8,000-12,000 square feet) which aligns with the goal of creating a smoother transition between rural and urban properties. The emphasis on larger estate lots in the transition area serves several important purposes: • Preserving Rural Character: By opting for larger lots, the development can offer a buffer that respects the rural and agricultural heritage of the area, maintaining a sense of openness. • Recognizing Scenic View Sheds and Open Space: Larger lots allow for more open space, which can help preserve key views and create a less dense, more spacious environment. This approach is particularly valuable if the area has scenic or historic value that residents and the community wish to preserve. • Ensuring Compatibility: Transitioning with larger lots prevents a stark contrast between high-density urban properties and lower-density rural areas, helping to avoid potential issues with traffic, noise, and visual impacts for existing rural properties. • Enhancing Quality of Life:Maintaining open spaces and respecting the area's agricultural roots can contribute to a more cohesive community atmosphere, balancing growth with the preservation of the area's heritage. The recommendation supports a balanced growth approach that would be more sensitive to the area's unique character and appeal. Five(5)common driveways are proposed with this subdivision. The applicant has provided common drive exhibits which demonstrate no more than three (3)units are served whereas a maximum of 4 units are allowed. The common driveway meets the minimum width of twenty (20)feet and does not exceed the maximum length of one hundred and fifty (150) feet. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited, unless separated by a minimum five (5) foot wide landscaped buffer. D. Design Standards Analysis The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 and 11-2A-7 for the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts. The proposed lots comply with the dimensional standards of the above-mentioned districts. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Ada County Highway District(ACHD) is requiring the applicant to dedicate additional right-of- way to total 39-feet from the section line of Locust Grove Road abutting the site. The applicant may need to revise their site plan to reflect this requirement. 1. Existing Structure: The current use of the property is agricultural with one (1) residential property and several outbuildings existing. The structures will be removed and the existing well and septic system will be abandoned as required. City utilities are required to be extended to serve the proposed development. 2. Qualified Open Space& Amenities (Comp Plan 2.02.00, Comp Plan 2.02.0IB, UDC 11-3G): Based on the standards in UDC Table 11-3G-3, a minimum of 15% (or 12.05-acres) of qualified open space is required to be provided within the development. An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.G, that depicts 24.36% (or 15.39-acres) of open space that meets the required quality and qualified open space standards. Based on the standards in UDC 11-3G-4A, a minimum of thirteen (13) amenity points are required to be provided. The amenities proposed are a swimmingpool facility,playground,pathways,pickle ball courts,soccer field, dog parks and several open space areas. All common open space areas are required to be landscaped with one deciduous shade tree for every 5,000 square feet of area and include a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover per UDC 11-3G-5B.3. The applicant needs to provide an amenity from the multi-modal group in order to meet the required standards. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.00 requires the applicant to plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.02.01E requires the applicant to evaluate open space and amenity requirements for consistency with community needs and values. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets UDC 11-2A-6 requires a twenty-five (25)foot wide buffer along arterial roads (S. Locust Grove)and a twenty (20)foot wide buffer is required along collector roads (Summerlin Drive prior to Delina Avenue and Barchetta Avenue). ii. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10, the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two (2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five (5)four-inch caliper trees,or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. The applicant shall add a mitigation section to the landscape plan for trees meeting the criteria above that are removed. iii. Storm integration Per UDC 11-3B-11, the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural,effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated, well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis stormwater facilities into required landscape areas, where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. Development will be required to meet UDC 11-3B-11 for stormwater integration. iv. Pathway landscaping Landscapingfor pathways shall meet the requirements outlined in UDC 11-3B-12. The applicant is required to provide a landscape strip a minimum of five (5)feet wide shall along each side of the pathway.Designs are encouraged in which the width of the landscape strip varies to provide additional width to plant trees farther from the pathway,preventing root damage. The minimum width of the landscape strip shall be two (2)feet to allow for maintenance of the pathway. The landscape strips shall be planted with a mix of trees, shrubs, lawn, and/or other vegetative ground cover. The applicant is required to add pathway landscaping along the Rawson Canal. 4. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for each home based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6. On-street parking is also available on the proposed streets. i. Residential parking analysis The proposal will be required to meet the standards for parking as set forth in UDC 11- 3C-6. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan 2.01.01 C, Architectural Standards Manual): Three(3)conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed subdivision as shown in Exhibit VII.K. The applicant states the homes in the Summerlin West Subdivision will include 337 homes with a mix of different product types, two-story and single-story detached single family homes. Buildings shall be designed with elevations that create interest through the use of broken planes, windows, and fenestrations that produce a rhythm of materials and patterns. Design review is not required for single family detached structures. However, because the rear and/or sides of homes facing S. Locust Grove Road, 5'. Barchetta Avenue and the collector portion of Summerlin Drive will be highly visible, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation (e.g.projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs), bays, banding, porches, balconies, material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from adjacent public streets. Single- story homes are exempt from this requirement. Design review is required for single-family attached and townhomes. Design review will have to meet the requirements outlined in the City's Architectural Standards Manual. Comprehensive Plan policy 2.01.01 C encourages the applicants to maintain a range of residential land use designations that allow diverse lot sizes, housing types, and densities. To support this policy staff recommends the applicant provide additional housing options (i.e. townhomes, single family attached) in the development. 6. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-7. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 7. Parkways (Comp Plan 3.07.01C, UDC 11-3A-17): Per Comp Plan policy 3.07.01 C appropriate landscaping, buffers, and noise mitigation with new development along transportation corridors (setback, vegetation, low walls,berms, etc.) is required. Per the UDC the minimum width of parkways planted with Class II trees shall be eight(8) feet. The width can be measured from the back of curb where there is no likely expansion of the street section within the right-of-way; the parkway width shall exclude the width of the sidewalk.Class II trees are the preferred parkway trees. The applicant is proposing a parkway along Summerlin Drive. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan 6.01.02B, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Per UDC 11-3A-3, the intent of these standards is to improve safety by combining and/or limiting access points to collector and arterial streets and ensuring that motorists can safely enter all streets unless waived by City Council. Access to the property is proposed from Summerlin Drive via S. Locust Grove. Secondary access is proposed to be provided via a new north/south collector roadway (Barchetta Avenue) abutting the site's east property line. For Ada County Highway District not to limit the development to 1,000 trips per day or the final platting of 100 building lots until secondary access is provided, the applicant is proposing to construct an emergency access onto Locust Grove Road approximately 430 feet south of Summerlin Drive and in alignment with Ambervale Street. There is an approved stub street as part of the Hadler Subdivision located north of the site. There is an existing private road, Cavali Lane, separating this site and Hadler Subdivision that will be required to be closed at the intersection with Locust Grove when the parcels to the east being served by this roadway develop. To allow for the stub street that was approved as part of Radler Subdivision to be extended in the future and allow for site circulation, the applicant was required to provide a stub street to the site's north property boundary line and in alignment with the stub street approved with Hadler Subdivision. Staff has concerns regarding access management and potential impacts due to the close proximity of the private road(E. Cavalli Lane) to the proposed public road(Summerlin Drive). Stafffeels the applicant and the adjacent property owner should coordinate to develop a shared access solution. A shared access point could potentially reduce traffic congestion and simplify entry/exit points,particularly for larger developments and not leave fifty(50)feet of undeveloped land. See image below. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis i i i FUTURE HADLER SUBDPASIDN + E.CA E.CAVALLI LANE(PRIVATE) RESCUE RANCH 1C BLOCK 12 1.G _ _ SUOUNISION E.SUMMERLIN DRNE----- -- ¢ 1c \ I 9 BLUCKI BLOCKS 4 \ 2 am�Eu aw wi` 10 SC 7 6 5 4 3 2 2 3 1 3 1 1 4 UNPLATTM 11 _E.HRISGATE STREET__—_� 7 36 miff 12 3 8 35 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 ! 10 8 33 7 1 14 BLOCK 2 S BL K 7 i iC SC 11C 10 22 10 31C / 11 15 DOG i1 d 12 i . 18 17 16 15 14 PARK 13 12 12 / 1s —E,AMBERVAIF 20 TOT LDT The applicant needs to provide a stub street to parcel#R8315200030 to the south of the property- Per ACHD, other than access specifically approved with this application, direct access to Locust Grove is prohibited. 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multiuse pathways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan, the Meridian Pathways Master Plan, the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. Detached ten (10)foot wide sidewalks (multiuse pathway)shall be provided along S. Recreation Avenue and Locust Grove Road frontages. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan 4.04.01A, UDC 11-3A-8): All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. Comprehensive Plan policy 4.04.01A ensure that new development and subdivisions connect to the pathway system. The Master pathway plan requires a 10 foot multi-use pathway along the north side of the Rawson Canal and the west side of Barchetta Avenue. The plat map does not appear to show a sidewalk along Locust Grove Road and only a five(5)foot sidewalk along Barchetta Avenue. The applicant needs to revise the preliminary plat and landscape plans to show the detached ten (10)foot wide sidewalks. 4. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. 5. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): There are no private streets proposed for this development. Cityof Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 6. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): i. Common driveways Per UDC 11-6C-3D, common driveways shall serve a maximum of four(4) dwelling units. In no case shall more than three(3)dwelling units be located on one(1) side of the driveway. The applicant is proposingfive (5) common driveways that meet the dimensional requirements as outlined in the UDC. ii. Block face UDC 11-6C-3-regulates block lengths for residential subdivisions. Staff has reviewed the submitted plat for conformance with these regulations. The intent of this section of code is to ensure block lengths do not exceed 750 ft, although there is the allowance of an increase in block length to 1,000 feet if a pedestrian connection is provided. In no case shall a block face exceed one thousand two hundred(1,200) feet,unless waived by the City Council. It appears that several blocks exceed 750 feet, but the applicant has provided a pedestrian connection as allowed by UDC 11-6C-3. However, E. Crimson Clover Drive exceeds the maximum block length of 1,200 feet by 665 feet(1,865 feet). The applicant has requested a waiver from Council for exceeded block length. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan 4.05.0ID, UDC 11-3A-6): Per UDC 11-3A-6, requires limiting the tiling and piping of natural waterways, including, but not limited to, ditches, canals, laterals, sloughs and drains where public safety is not a concern as well as improve,protect and incorporate creek corridors (Five Mile, Eight Mile, Nine Mile, Ten Mile, South Slough and Jackson and Evan Drains) as an amenity in all residential, commercial and industrial designs. When piping and fencing is proposed, the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-6B shall apply. Comprehensive Plan policy 4.05.OID requires improving and protecting creeks and other natural waterways throughout commercial, industrial, and residential areas. The Ada County Highway District(ACHD)stated a bridge is required to be constructed on Barchetta Avenue over the Rawson Canal as it runs east and west along the site's southern property line. The cost of the construction for the bridge will be shared by the properties to the east once they develop. ACHD is requiring the applicant to provide a road trust deposit prior to the district signing the first final plat for % of the widening of the bridge on Locust Grove over the Rawson Canal and a road trust deposit for the crossing on Barchetta Avenue over the Rawson Canal to allow for construction of the bridge in the future. The applicant will need to request a Council waiver to keep the Rawson Canal open. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best City of Meridian i Department Report III. Staff Analysis management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.03G, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. All utilities are available to the site. Water main,fire hydrant and water service require a twenty foot(20) wide easement that extends ten (10)feet past the end of main, hydrant, or water meter. No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS& CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat will not be accepted until the Annexation ordinance and development agreement are approved by City Council. Currently,a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape plan,phasing plan, and conceptual building elevations for the single-family dwellings included in Section IV and the provisions contained herein. b. The rear and/or sides of 2-story structures that face S. Locust Grove, S. Barchetta Avenue and Summerlin Drive prior to S. Steeple Avenue shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs), bays, banding, porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines. Single-story structures are exempt from this requirement. 2--Pfe ide a ri e d ell sue#as side€anvil att ec a tee h �with desk allewe&by-the-Gemor-eheasi"l - itl tl�e -�5 ie�dis iEt 3. The Preliminary Plat included in Section VII, dated 10/10/24, is approved with the following revisions: a. All utility easements reflected on the utility plan shall be included on the final plat. b. All pathways and micropathways shall be within a separate common lot or easement as required per UDC 11-3A-8. sRemise-fl►et3lat-�ra��s#i€��r�ee�I�er�-4�eei�€e�Iet�-��--��leelF�a� �e�ide-a-Iega-l-desc-�i�iee- �-te-�Ei�-€�€teeth-f-)--S�Ela�s-e�ie�-te-�e C—it�C—eanEi-1 meeting: d:---P-re�e-�s €�s�r�:Sammerl�r-B�i�te-t�el#-�8�-1-5�9A93& e. Revise preliminary plat map to show the right-of-way dedication along S.Locust Grove Road. 4. The Landscape Plan included in Section VII, dated 5/28/24,shall be submitted for review and approval with the following revisions prior to final plat approval: a. Show the ten(10)foot wide detached sidewalks along the east side frontage of Locust Grove Road and the west side frontage of Barchetta Avenue. b. Add pathway landscaping along the south side of the Rawson Canal. c. Add shrubs/ornamental grasses/perennials to the pathway within Lot 1 C,Block 1 and Lot 11 C, Block 11. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments& Conditions 5. Provide an amenity from the multi-modal group in order to meet the required standards per UDC 11-3G-4. 6. The applicant shall comply with the open space exhibit approved as part of this plat application that depicts 24.36%(or 15.39-acres) of qualified open space and exceeds the required amenity points. 7. Prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer, the applicant shall submit a public access easement for the multi-use pathway along S. Locust Grove to the Planning Division for approval by City Council and subsequent recordation or unless required by ACHD. 8. The applicant shall construct all proposed fencing and/or any fencing required by the UDC, consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7 and 11-3A-6B, as applicable. 9. The development shall comply with standards and installation for landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-5 and maintenance thereof as set forth in UDC 11-3B-13. 10. Pathway and adjoining fencings and landscaping shall be constructed consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A7, 11-3A-8 and 11-3B-12C. 11. The development shall comply with all subdivision design and improvement standards as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3, including but not limited to driveways, easements, blocks, street buffers, and mailbox placement. 12. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family detached dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. 13. All common driveways shall meet the requirements of 11-6C-2-D including a perpetual ingress/egress easement being filed with the Ada County Recorder,which shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. 14. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed gathering barn and pool area prior to submittal of a building permit application. The design of the site and structures shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19; the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 15. A Design Review application shall be submitted and approved for the single-family attached and townhomes. The design of the structures shall comply with the standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 16. The Applicant shall have a maximum of two(2)years to obtain City Engineer's signature on a final plat in accord with UDC 11-6B-7. 17. The Applicant shall comply with all conditions of ACHD. 18. Staff s failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the applicant from compliance. B. Meridian Public Works See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblirzk.meridiaracity.orjzlWebLirzk/Browse.aspx?id=351919c&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions C. Meridian Park's Department See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X D. Irrigation Districts 1. Boise Project Board of Control See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridia nCitv E. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X F. Kuna School District See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X G. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:Ilweblink.meridiancity.orQ/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit x H. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orzlWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit x I. Ada County Development Services See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridianciry.orQ/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=351919&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit x V. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission, the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: l. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Commission finds annexation of the subject site with an R-8 and R-15 zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Medium Density Residential and Low Density Residential FLUM designation for this property, if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IV. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Commission finds the lot sizes and layout proposed will be consistent with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that housing opportunities will be provided consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Stafffinds that the map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The school district states they cannot serve the proposed development because the proposed plats in this zone are beyond district capacity. This proposed development will impact Silver Trail Elementary, Fremont Middle School, Kuna High School and Swan Falls High School zones which are already at or over capacity with the current enrollment. Unlike West Ada School District, the Kuna School District does not have a lot of options when it comes to busing students to different schools or redrawing the school boundaries. 5. The annexation(as applicable) is in the best interest of city. Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IV. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; Commission finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval in Section IV. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Commission finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. Sewer is approximately 900 feet from the property line and the property owner must provide sewer to and through parcel R8315200020. The water mainline is approximately 890 feet away from the property. The development of the Hadler Subdivision will bring the water main line within 70 feet of the property. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Commission finds the proposed plat is in substantial conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's Capital Improvement Program. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Commission finds there is publicfnancial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Commission finds the proposed development is not detrimental to the public health,safety, and general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Commission finds the development is preserving the Rawsom Canal by keeping it open as a naturalfeature. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation and preliminary plat per the conditions of approval included in Section IV in accord accordance with Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on November 19,2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subiect annexation and preliminary plat requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Hethe Clark representing the applicant, b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Tony and Jeanie Mayer, Anna B Canning, David Crawford,Jason Reddy representing Kuna School District d. Written testimony: Tony and Jeanie Mayer, Anna B Canning, Laren Bailey, Robert Bruno g. _Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. Cavalli Lane,Kuna School District student capacity, were the neighborhood meeting requirements met 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Cavalli Lane, Kuna School District student capacity, were the neighborhood meeting requirements met 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Deleted conditions 2 and 3d 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on December 17,2024. At the.public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject annexation and preliminary plat re-aests, 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing; a In favor: Hethe Clark representing the applicant b. In opposition: None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: None Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parson 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issuefsl of discussion by City Council: a. Kuna School District student capacity and enrollment issues City of Meridian i Department Report Vl. Action 4. City Council change(sl to Commission recommendation; a. Deleted condition 3c City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action • .VOW ct Location of Impact aw �. u Analysis LAKE HAZEL ,�, loll Legend Project Location Area of Impact �= � �" �o �• . COL-UMBI�A— .$1 r. 1 0� 4 111 y��.YYYFYYI 0 AnalysisRUT IC-C L-AKE HAZEL """' r�ttN lrNrba'N.1 Isp : ...._ .' . � � S•':i1iiC _ VUY uY1 11■�1��„� w� � �pL�UMBLAI �1�� �1 =� 11 111!............. Ien h.5 � ♦ �"","ii1u� • d nIw p `� IIAII 3. Future Land Use Legend ;. � ®® Project Location I ; [� 9!144R :.:Area of Impact r , Analysis - Med-High Density - - I -trMUTC° C*i�lc r Residential J • i Medium Density Residential 1 •� } -- e Low Density ClResidential 3, D + —,t4 4. Planned Development Map Legend 10_ � �� '++ Li.:u:i Project Location �all Area of Impact sty T_" City Limits Planned Parcels 1 1 Analysis Ffl I � P �� l3 City of Meridian i Department Report VII. Exhibits 5. Map Notes Nearby Recent Preliminary Plats(within last 5-years) H-2021-0020 H-2021-0062 H-2022-0036 Nearby Recent Conditional Use Permits (within last 5-years) H-2019-0123 H-2020-0009 H-2020-0057 H-2020-0127 H-2021-0087 H-2021-0086 H-2018-0043 H-2017-0129 H-2020-0056 H-2022-0036 H-2022-0064 H-2023-0047 H-2023-0050 H-2024-0014 B. Subject Site Photos 61, aai.• n y- r d . �sa1 '�df f .4� 'x• f r R� 1 ,sty W City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL RS147110200 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 8 2nd Percentile Criteria —TDescri Location Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshcd mains 500-2,000 ft. from parcel YELLOW Roodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain o > 2 ac eq GPEEN Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. <;FEEIA Emergency Services Police Not enough data to report average response time in Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways �F?q Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route LF Ultimate configuration (4 of lanes in master streets Arterial Road Buildout Status plan) > existing (# of lanes) & road IS NOT in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity Not within 1 mile walking School brivability Not within 2 miles driving of existing Or future school r Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within EE'j 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Annexation Legal Description & Exhibit Map A Description fo Annexation 5ummerlin Subdivision June 12,2024 All of Lots 2 and 3.Block 1, Laredo Estates Subdivision as filed in Book 56 of Plats at Pages 5500 and 5501, records of Ada County, Idaho and unplatted portions of the Southwest 114 of Section 5,Township 2 North, Range 1 East Boise-Meridian Ada County, Idaho more particularly dascrioed as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 5 6, 7 and 8,T.2N_, R,1E., B M ,from which the 114 corner common to said Sections 5 and 6 bears,North 00'04'42"West, 2655 92 feet.thence on the west boundary line of said Section 5, North 00'04'42"West, 973.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINMtNG thence continuing, North 00°04'42"West., 1,138.85 feet to the westerly prolongation of the southerly boundary line of Rescue Ranch Subdivision as filed in Book 106 of Plats at Pages 14734 through 14736, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said weal boundary line on said southerly boundary line and the westerly prniongation thefeaf the following seven(7)courses and distances: South 89°52'36"East,696.77 feet; South 68°53'16"East, 332.83 feet; South 31°36'40"East, 154.12 fact; South 64°34'41"East, 290.51 feet; South 48'18'53"East, 155.34 feet, North 00'04'42"West, 535.82 feet; South 89'52'33"East, 1,19235 feet to the Southeast corner of said Rescue Ranch Subdivision; thence on the north-south centerline of said Section 5, South 00'00'59"West. 1,081.82 feet to the Northeast corner of Tamarack Ridge Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5672 and 5673, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence leaving said north-south oenterline on the northerly boundary line of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision the following seven t7)courses and distances; ` �G�NS North 61'46'52"West, 361.44 feet; 91 1 779 D fz 4c South 82'33'31 West, 182.68 feet; North 66'5601"West, 362.91 feet; hf tCA ' Page 1 of 2 City of Meridian I Department Report V11. Exhibits 314.02 feet on the arc of a curvy to the left having a radius of 267.40 feet, a central angle of 67°17'03", and along chard which bears South 79'25727" West, 296.28 feet; South 45'4656"West, 829.67 feet; South 57°24'55"West 143,12 feet, South 67°2T28"West 176.39 feet to the Northwest corner of said Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, coincident with the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Black I of said Laredo Estates Subdivision thence eaving the northerly boundary of said Tamarack midge Subdivision on the northerly boundary line of said Lot 4 and the westerly prolongation thereof the following three(3)courses and distances: North 87°28'39"West, 78 00 feet; North 59°23'39"West,474.00 feet, NoRh 51921139"West, 214,44 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing i33.965 acres, more or less. End of Description, -- %CIE c` p¢1 € 11779 a 1z ( OF 1 JwcCA t Page 2 of 2 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 1/4 C1/4 S_5 S.6 . S-5 Rescue n Srr n Ra-nch Sub. yy 0ar ILCI go 113 S69'52'35"E 1192.35' �SBS'52'313-E 696.77'— { Sg 3 0 CO CIACFO E x: �4T C + JJ�ffJ• ff{'J�� +l � N n ±63.H5 Acres J N � / 0 0 7, f ti / // / C as. . G p m C7 ! r 4 ? P*Int of 16N • Beglnninq � .a� h 4 9 Tawmrack k Ridge Sub. � C L6 15 o Lo1 a, Mock I Line Table o Larwtfo Est4ews Sub cn ' I Line 9earing Le++gth �cn ' I L1 53135'40"E 154.12' S.6 5.5 _-- L2 Sa8°18'S3'E 155,34' —___— r_— _• — 1/4 S-5 5,7 5,8 W- Columbia Rd. S,B 0S8233'31"W 182.68' pa LAB L4 S57'2C55"W 143.12' Na L5 567'27'28'W 176,35' L6 N87'26'39"W 78-OW a � � 779 L7 H51'21'39'W 1 214.44' f IPf Curve Table ' MCCh ` Cur" Length Radius Drita Chord Bearing rZ9 ,21W Length C1 314.02' 267.40' 67'17'03" S79-2S'27'w 0 100 2a0 400 B00 o: 9b Imm i3-1e5 4n.x Ga tlai 4J]aS�L19:]l"J Exhibit Drawing for doh No IDAHO Annexation U-2W SURVEY 'M Summerlin Subdivsion shobt No, GROUP, LLIr Y6li Mb1W P AN of Late 2 and 3, Black 1, Laroda Esimk— Grbdlwbn and un'4o41ad 1 i Porllsne sf 01s SW1/4 of SeCtlon 5, TZN.. k,1E.. B.1I., Ado Cll►itV. lfthox Dwq• ChO4 BL12 2024 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Preliminary Plat(date: 10/10/2024) 's� si.i'il� s, "Eloo : li slys I �: BB@ i+1 s !! I' Illi �i I i ` SI i• ��1 1 JillI ! ff i t i i ►isil� =s�'I f ii j€ `lMil I \,'`•�.'s ��del �� ��#�� j r RII 4 'iNl C s` p r ------------- ------------- — — — — ------ !i!I t� ON ! P ii, 1 i = eFot��a '�s;lglipyA9=SdI;Ql�lil K 1 k ?9.�5513 i�+II�p II II. bi[lil Il;�'l lg� dFR3 � [ $ igi��de�pi! p II .'IiE pal, e `�16.e= '�ibli �Iy II ilpsf I I II a Q I o.�en a+ewoa a'mEmn 4 SUMMERLII9SU@DIVISION O �- i ! �!i caef,ssrrlu rolGS i i LAMMRI �B7�j% City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Landscape Plan (date: 6/10/2024) -- - -- --- ' -; N} z A _ _ . ,qm k7fr'�, SUMMERLIN SUBDIVISION •._« Ev`E-B MERIDIAN, It PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN ,t7.t," ,.,."•4YF-• --� J J J J J Ve�.t 1 1 s� �I S U M M E R L I N SUBDIVISION _ M••=,.=a=. Na , MERIDIAN. ID PRELIMINARY PLAT LANDSCAPE PLAN City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits �► � RIP11111111111�11� gyp► �.- � I - - mom mm IME r � s - ME 0 ®ao AM 0 = ■ra i i� H. Block Length �l� P --------_—®®a-l(4WT9tl"M.MI9 T r j ! L { ` I ` 1 • f E I I f � 9� � II• I `"� �F 4 1 II I I I` I n � pt�pR 44�lWR aIR1fYM C '!SUMMERLIN SUDDNISION —Y—!1�ATIM �� ¢ ONu04ARYGNPIP.LLG l I eucn un�n+�wiar id, EMU-7.W., City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits I. Common Driveways E,SUM MERUN DRIVE 7. ° s ti ar Iv r ------ •V, t r 1 I Yro:` i 1 1 S r BUD.�ING its' 2 1 ORIENTATION I 1 T 0 3 F � � _ I I 1 I { Bd_OCK L__.______ D ua ! SC 1 m c[ I m rX I r r---------- --, 1 � I 4J � � 1 w T•i 1 F I I GUIDING 117 raa ORIEWATION f F i - Im I CRIVEWAY{TYP ®ULDING 117 —— — —�; .•t ." ORIENTATION E-RILLSOATE STREET 1 • EUILDING t ?_ ORIENTATION I rS` I I � +, ---------- BUILDING ORIENTATION 62 ---�II +r Y24t;' [SIET&iCAi UNE(T1°R.)— as n f. C SCALE:I K e CIVIL INNOVATIONS SUMMERIN SUBDIVISION ° - F,ERDNN.■NRD �s�.maw��. .�.�... ��.�.� e � oati>tio-� wx r DRIVEWAY EJINIBIT r a ® WC6GF ■t voila �,zr City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits E.SUMPOIFLIKLIN DRIVE F-SUMERLIN DRIVE 0! ---------------I rr I r-21—-I r- ----4 GUIDING 7 6 1 -- z OFIJEWTATION z I -a- 212 -1�t2v ------T4------------- CLOCK r------ ------------- ac I =1 w j E 5 r 17 GUIDING ORIENTATION ------------- 24Y GUIDING Z, RIVEWAY ITYP..l ORIENTATION 3 ----------- IL HILLHGATK STREET ------------ IT 1 12 1"LDING ORIENTATION ;jL. L----- -j--------- 42 "194 A"Z SULMN0. ORIENTATION TR �-SETBACK LINE ITYPL, I 6-2 �A.1011112 4 ? F SCAU 1-48 SUMMERIN SUBDIVISION CIVIL ININIOVAT[ONS M.—IMMUNAL GIYlL aN. FIRMS PAERMPLIDAH0 MVEVAY EMWT LIM wk City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits Wk.H z SETBACK LINE 4TYP.) 17 BLINDING ORIENTATION -L-----------0 ...... IL CRINHO N CLOVER BRIVE 77 117 BLINDING ORIENTATION DRIVEWAYITY-P. I------- --- 17 5c BLINDING r--- ORIENTATION a 0 I 4 1 ---------- ---- ----------- 75 17 71 72 BLINDING z J ORIENTATION L----------- .7 1 12, IRRIOATJON POND Ili&L ISTR 62 2 it� IN P. CICIVIL INNOVATIONS M SUMERIN SUBDIVISION . L., . .... %­3" Islas A OFVVEWAY EA40T City of Meridian I Department Report V11. Exhibits rI RTH 10 r---- °d I I ( 13 r 13 I S' 16 I �r �, _ BUILDING 4 ORIENTATION 1 JI BLOCK 9 L--------} 1 ?!c— A I O8d I 14C r----------- — ---� 1 m(C I I m GC I 1 0 I I Q 1S 117 3 BUILDING ORIENTATION +Yr ---------- — -- �' 17 U lY V DRIVEWAY(TYP. - _ r.,_ BUILDING e",:' ORIENTATION O i.CLOUDCROFT STREET .a L— _J r----------- ---� 18 1120 BUILDING ORIENTATION L------------ — J { _ ----- — -- 1S 7 A 17 +. r BUILD'tdG ORIENTATION 'I 5ETBACK LINE(TYR.r a } r 1 ° I �,STjR k LkV2 I `".1011112 4 Q y r ` 4, 0� y iJ•df E 1 IQ 7♦Ir SUIIAMERIN SUBDIVISION �jCIVIL INNOVATIONS �woresa7oww i cceT o>G lu ]tltfliiN W A�RUYIN.i1HC5 �a�cus ens si isi ss�emu a�i.9�lsrsitl sou �svaw I aMW tl mN LW�EWAY E7W&T O`3!0 Qf - ® fl611i MBtl City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 0% —4--------------- 1 12' 1 S. 112 BUILDING 13 3' ORIENTATION z ------------- BLOM a r-- -------- lie L a a 17 1 I I BOLDING I ORIENTATION I IL 12 BULDING ORIENTATION �—DRWEWAY(TYP.) E.CLOUDCROFT STRINT 7 BUILDING ORIENTATION HL— -� --P� ------------ 12 1 a BUILDING ORIENTATION -v EMACK LINE(TYP.) I Dl;AL f 103 TO C, 4, Am X a 40 ta���nl ? KAU:1.40 SUMMERIN SUBDIVISION Cj&%lkl%NvYVATlQN5 = MW ENG NERDAN.IDAHO ram oclsaw Yf�rt✓r roe ORNILWYEWBIT 0@=DN wr awa rar City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits J. Phasing Plan LI •6 R6 A • R• c tr c [ R L S r tl o *ONO oaswea euahxML SUMMERLIM SUB6IYISIO#4 ... .. am.� 9Ni0M(YRROI LLL �Rr.� City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits K. Building Elevations(date: 6/17/2024) Elevations F 1 PEE E - `_ -• City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits L. Open Space Amenities A. large Central Park(Block 6, Lot 1) This five acre park will contain the following lacilities= Y • Pool Facility Two Pickleball Courts • Fenced Dog ParkSiY Dog Waste Facility �'� r' Playground Cii tubing Rada * Seating Benches f Attractive Landscaping Two large lawn areas r- Pedestrian Pathway E City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits B_ Dog Parks(Block 2, Lot 8)and(Mock 7, Lot 17) • Fenaed clog Park • Waste Station + Seating Areas a•r,,. • Attractive landscaping C. Pathways The Surnrnerlin Neighborhood will inelude the following pedestrian pathways: • 10'Wide Regional Pathway—1,682 LF D. Comer open green areas— several other open spaces will have the following arnenities- ■ Shade structures + Large open grass areas Internal Pathways + Picnic Area + Attractive Landscaping City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES& DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES, AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days. Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area, transitional development, government,and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2 <5.0; R-4<2.0; R-8 < 1.0; R-15 <0.5; R-40< 0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates, usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries (TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan (e.g. pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size, configuration, right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources, including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. City of Meridian ' Department Report VIII. Additional Notes & Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS). LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F. Letter A represents free flow conditions,and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D,stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians, nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian ' Department Report VIII. Additional Notes & Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Addendum to Development Agreement (Jump Time H-2025-0011) Between City of Meridian and Babcock LLC for Property Located at 2805 E. Franklin Rd. Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034469 Boise,Idaho Pgs=25 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES: 1. City of Meridian 2. Babcock LLC, Owner/Developer THIS ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is dated this 3rd day of June 2025, ("ADDENDUM"), by and between City of Meridian, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho ("CITY"), whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642 and Babcock LLC ("OWNER/DEVELOPER"), whose address is 1379 N Cloverdale Road, Boise, Idaho 83713. RECITALS A. OWNER/DEVELOPERsubmitted an application for a Modification to the existing Development Agreement recorded June 8, 2016 as Instrument 42016-049722 in Ada County Records for the purpose of modifying a provision contained in the original development agreement and to replace the old concept plan with a new one. The Meridian City Council approved said application with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as in the attached Exhibit"A." B. CITY and OWNER/DEVELOPER now desire to amend said Development Agreement, which terms have been approved by the Meridian City Council in accordance with Idaho Code Section 67-6511. NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the covenants and conditions setforth herein, the parties agree as follows: I. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be bound by the terms of the Development Agreement recorded June 8, 2016 as Instrument 92016-049722, except as specifically amended as follows: 5. CONDITIONS GOVERNING DEVELOPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 5.1 Owner/Developer shall develop the Property in accordance with the following special conditions: I. Future development of this site shall substantially comply with the revised conceptual development plan;dated March 28th, 2025, included in Section VI of the Staff Retort attached to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as attached hereto as Exhibit A an, d the provisions contained herein. 44+e-app4eftFA-sha44- e *-pe�an ei��at p%ew-affd Ee eEtiens-te-F--EftapAd Read- plan- e B itted- tl+e=fifst eettif Bate a€� i> a applieatierr 2. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning Department for approval of all future buildings/uses on the site,prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Direct access to E. Franklin Road is limited to the access shown on the conceptual development plan approved with this application. Cross-access shall be provided to the property to the west(parcel 9S 1117120630) and the property to the east(parcel 4S 1117110201) for future interconnectivity. A recorded copy of the cross-access MODIFICA'FION TO DEVELOPMENI'AGREEMENT-:JUMP TIME II-2025-0011 Page l of 4 agreement(s) shall be provided with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 4. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services. Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources. Contact Robert B. Whitney at (208)334- 2190. 5. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections (208)375-5211. 6. The uses allowed pursuant to this agreement are those uses allowed in the C-C zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2 except for the following: drinking establishments, fuel sales facility, vehiele-fepaif, vehicle washing facility, wireless communication facility and vehicle sales and rentals. 7. All future development of the subject property shall comply with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. 8. The developer/owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with sewer and water service installation. 9. The developer/owner shall construct an 8-foot vinyl fence along the west boundary of the property and a 6-foot fence that matches the existing fence t#at-Mimes-tie is iffg €epee adjacent to the southern property boundary and terminates on the western property boundary at the northeast corner of the Yoder Property (Parcel 9R3273150110). The owner/developer shall coordinate with the adjacent property owners on the construction of the respective fences. 10. The owner/developer shall construct a 35-foot-wide street buffer adjacent to Franklin Road and a 2-9 25-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the west and southern property boundary and a 5-foot-wide landscape buffer on the east property boundary in accordance with UDC 11-3B-7 and UDC 11-3B-9. 11. Any buildings along the southern property boundary shall not exceed 35 feet in height to maintain compatibility with the adjacent residential properties. 12. Bring the existing landscaping buffers and parking lot landscaping into conformity with UDC 11-3B and demonstrate compliance with the submittal of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the vacant lot(Parcel #S 1117110510). 2. That OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees to abide by all ordinances of the City of Meridian and the Property shall be subject to de-annexation if the Owner/Developer, or their assigns, heirs, or successor shall not meet the conditions of this Addendum, and the Ordinances of the City of Meridian as herein provided. 3. This Addendum shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives, including City's corporate authorities and their successors in office. This Addendum shall be binding on the Owner/Developer of the Property, each subsequent owner and any other person(s)acquiring an interest in the Property. Nothing herein shall in any way prevent sale or alienation of the Property, or portions thereof, except that any sale or alienation MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT—JUMP TIME H-2025-0011 Page 2 of 4 shall be subject to the provisions hereon and any successor owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. City agrees, upon written request of Owner/Developer, to execute appropriate and recordable evidence of termination of this Addendum if City, in its sole and reasonable discretion, had determined that Owner/Developer have fully performed its obligations under this Addendum. 4. If any provision of this Addendum is held not valid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised from this Addendum and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any of the other provisions contained herein. 5. This Addendum sets forth all promises,inducements,agreements,conditions, and understandings between Owner/Developer and City relative to the subject matter herein, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions or under-standing, either oral or written, express or implied, between Owner/Developer and City, other than as are stated herein. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Addendum shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by them or their successors in interest or their assigns, and pursuant, with respect to City, to a duly adopted ordinance or resolution of City. a. Except as herein provided, no condition governing the uses and/or conditions governing development of the subject Property herein provided for can be modified or amended within the approval of the City Council after the City has conducted public hearing(s) in accordance with the notice provisions provided for a zoning designation and/or amendment in force at the time of the proposed amendment. 6. This Addendum shall be effective upon execution of the Mayor and City Clerk. 7. Except as amended by the Addendums, all terms of the previous Agreements shall remain in full force and effect. [End of text. Acknowledgements, signatures, and Exhibit A follow.] MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-JUMP TIME H-2025-0011 Page 3 of 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN WETNESS WI1FREOF,the rwtics have herein acclrtcd this Addendum and made it &ec iveasficrcinabovcpmvidcd. OWNERIDEVELOPER: Babco&LLC its: STATE OF IDAHO 1 )ss. County of Ada j On this li day of_ l 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared ,known or identified to me to be the_0 -- of Babcock LLC and the person who signed above and acknowledged to me that they executed the t_L_ir r- .d corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set m hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this ccrtrffeate first above written. =PUSLIC SICKLE _ 0224778 Notary Public / LIC Mycoimnissionexpires., 0^d2 AHOIRES 10/07/28 CITY OF MERIDIAN ATTEST: By:--------- Mayor Robert E. Srmison Lfu-is Johnso %City Cierk 6-3-2025 -3-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) ss County of Ada ) June On this 3rd day of_ _ ,2025,before me,a Notary Public,personally appeared Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson,known or identified to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instalment or the person that executed the instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho 3-28-2028 My commission expires- MODLHCATtONTODEVFf.OI Y-NrAGTUI3, M-JUWTMitil-20n-oorf Paga4of4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW aVE IDIAN:--' AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for a modification to the existing development agreement(MDA-15- 008,Inst.#2016-049722)to modify provision six(6)to remove "minor vehicle repair" from the prohibited uses and replace the old concept plan with a new one, by Eric Anderson. Case No(s). H-2025-0011 For the City Council Hearing Date of: April 22°a, 2025 (Findings on May 6'",2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 22"d,2025, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 22°d, 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 22°1, 2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of May 6", 2025, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67, Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title 11 Meridian City Code,and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance,established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) - 1 - 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of April 22"d,2025, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Development Agreement Modification is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of April 22°d,2025,attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-651IA. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six (6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(a),an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-652 1(1)(d)and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of April 22"d, 2025. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -2- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 6th day of May, 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED AYE COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED_AYE COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTEDAYE COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED AYE COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED AYE MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor obert Si son 5-6-2025 Attest: p � SEAL Chris Jo on 5-6-2025 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant,Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. Y 5- 6 -025 BCh�qj�OA Dated: City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -3- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E IDIAN:-- DEPARTMENT REPORT IDAHO HEARING 4/22/2025 Legend DATE: C' Project Location ; TO: Planning&Zoning Commission I Area of Impact i= City Limits f^ FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner 4 Analysis 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Eric Anderson SUBJECT: H-2025-0011 i Jump Time MDA LOCATION: Located at 2805 E. Franklin Road (Parcels S 1117110550 and Fi rr S 1117110510)in the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 17,T.3N., R.lE. I H I 'd-lam. 1' PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Modification to the existing development agreement(MDA-15-008, Inst. #2016-049722)to modify provision six(6)to remove "minor vehicle repair" from the prohibited uses and replace the old concept plan with a new one. B. Recommendation Staff: Staff recommends approval of the DA modification with provisions listed in Section IV. C. Decision Council: Approved with the Modification to the DA FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -4- COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Commercial/Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial - ll. Existing Zoning C-C Zoning VI.A.2 Adopted FLUM Designation Commercial VI.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 1/28/2025 Neighborhood Meeting 2/20/2025 Site posting date 4/12/2025 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency Element Description Issue Reference Meridian Public Works Wastewater Error! Reference source not found. • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns Yes,any infrastructure changes must be approved by Public Works. Meridian Public Works Water Error! Reference source not found. • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns Yes,any infrastructure changes must be approved by Public Works. Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions for comments received or see the public record. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -5- Table 4: Project Overview Description Details History AZ-09-003, MDA-15-008,A-2016-0316 Acreage 3.57 Acres STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code (UDC) A. General Overview and History The property was annexed with C-C zoning in 2009,consisting of 3.57 acres with two (2) building lots (AZ-09-003). The subject property then went through a development agreement modification to replace the existing DA in 2016 as a part of the Jump Time approval (MDA-15- 008). The concept plan accompanying this DA modification showed 4 buildings with central access to Franklin Road. However, since the annexation, access was required to shift to the west property boundary,which affected the concept plan. Due to the original concept plan, city staff had restricted certain uses,as having children walking through the parking lot with the central access point was a point of concern. Since the access has shifted and cross access has been provided from the property to the east, staff is in support of amending the DA to allow for minor vehicle repair. This use will be rather isolated from the front entrance to Jump Time, and staff is recommending signage to watch for pedestrians. Additionally,minor vehicle repair is otherwise a permitted use in the C-C zone. The properties governed by the current DA do not meet the city's landscaping standards.As a part of the DA modification, staff is requiring the existing parking lot and landscape buffers to be brought into conformity with UDC 11-3B. Staff discussed this with the applicant during the pre- application meeting,and no concerns were expressed by the applicant. In terms of nearby and adjacent development,there are existing residential subdivisions to the south and west,with commercial to the east. The proposed minor vehicle repair building is oriented away from the existing residential area,which is buffered by the existing Jump Time building and the landscape buffers. B. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant is requesting a Development Agreement Modification to allow for Minor Vehicle Repair, which is currently listed as a prohibited use in the DA, an otherwise permitted use in the C-C zoning district. The proposed user"Grease Monkey" is a national oil change and vehicle repair shop. The hours of operation will be limited to 6 am to 11 pm because of its proximity to the existing residential neighborhoods. The applicant has submitted an updated concept plan to reflect the current configuration of the site. The original concept plan shows 4 buildings on the subject properties but with the relocation of the main access point, only two buildings are proposed with the updated concept plan. 2. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): A. Vehicle repair may be allowed as an accessory use, subject to the standards for vehicle repair, major and minor, in the district where the use is located. Not applicable. Vehicle Repair is the primary use. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -6- B. Inoperable or dismantled motor vehicles shall be stored behind a closed vision fence, wall, or screen or within an enclosed structure and shall not be visible from any street. Not applicable. The applicant will not have inoperable or dismantled vehicles on the property. C. Automotive sales and rental areas shall be subject to the minimum perimeter landscape requirement of parking areas in chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title. Not applicable. D. In addition to chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title, one (1) square foot of landscaping for every fifty (50) square feet of vehicle display area shall be provided. Not applicable. E. Vehicle display pads are prohibited in the required landscape buffers. Not applicable. The applicant will not have a vehicle display area. F. Vehicle display areas shall incorporate design features including, but not limited to, landscape islands, curbing, and pedestrian walkways, that define main drive aisles and internal circulation patterns. Not applicable. C. Development Agreement Modification Existing Provisions: 1. Future development of this site shall substantially comply with the revised conceptual development plan dated March 28", 2025, included in Section VI and the provisions contained herein.T4w-applieant s13a11- see�ate pe�lestiarsilotie�r plan that amides intefeenneetivity within the pfepesed development pedestrian-eennecMiens- E €+ate Read-plan sl3 sit fitted with-the-€ 4-eertifieate a€ge intee ianee-appheatien. 2. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning Department for approval of all future buildings/uses on the site, prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Direct access to E. Franklin Road is limited to the access shown on the conceptual development plan approved with this application. Cross-access shall be provided to the property to the west(parcel#S 1117120630)and the property to the east(parcel#S 1 1 171 10201) for future interconnectivity.A recorded copy of the cross-access agreement(s) shall be provided with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application. 4. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8,within 6 months after the date of annexation ordinance approval. Contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at (208)898-5500 for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert B. Whitney at(208)334-2190. 5.Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. 6. The uses allowed pursuant to this agreement are those uses allowed in the C-C zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2 except for the following: drinking establishments, fuel sales facility, FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -7- ..ehie er-epaivehicle washing facility,wireless communication facility and vehicle sales and rentals. 7. Bring the existing landscaping buffers and parking lot landscaping into conformity with UDC 11-3B. 8. All future development of the subject property shall comply with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. 9. The developer/owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with sewer and water service installation. 10. The developer/owner shall construct an 8-foot vinyl fence along the west boundary of the property and a 6-foot fence that matches the existing fence that matches the existing fence adjacent to the southern property boundary and terminate on the western property boundary at the northeast corner of the Yoder Property(Parcel#R3273150110). The owner/developer shall coordinate with the adjacent property owners on the construction of the respective fences. 11. The owner/developer shall construct a 35-foot wide street buffer adjacent to Franklin Road and a N-25-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the west and southern property boundary and a 5- foot wide landscape buffer on the east property boundary in accordance with UDC 11-3B-7 and UDC 11-313-9. 12. Any buildings along the southern property boundary shall not exceed 35 feet in height to maintain compatibility with the adjacent residential properties. D. Staff Analysis With the primary access to the development now relocated to the western boundary and cross access provided to the adjacent eastern property, staff supports the applicant's request to amend the existing development agreement(Inst#2016-049722)to remove vehicle repair minor as a prohibited use and update the concept plan. Furthermore, the current landscape buffers and parking lot landscaping on both properties fall below standard and will be required to be brought into compliance with the certificate of zoning compliance application for parcel#S1117110510. Staff has incorporated this requirement as a new condition in the development agreement and has been in discussions with the applicant about this prior to the submission of the request. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS& CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6)months of the City Council granting the modification.The addendum shall,at a minimum, incorporate the following provisions: A. The applicant shall comply with the provisions in the existing development agreement (Instrument#2016-049722)with the addition/modification of the following provisions. • Modify Provision#1: Future development of the subject site shall be substantially consistent with the revised concept plan dated March 28`'', 2025, included in Section VI and the provisions contained herein. • Modify Provision#6 to remove vehicle repair,minor as a prohibited use: The uses allowed pursuant to this agreement are those uses allowed in the C-C zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2,except for the following: drinking establishments,fuel sales facility,vehicle washing facility, wireless communication facility, and vehicle sales and rentals. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -8- • Add a New Provision to state: Bring the existing landscaping buffers and parking lot landscaping into conformity with UDC 11-3B and demonstrate compliance with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance application for the vacant lot(Parcel #S1117110510). • Modify Provision#11 to state a 25-foot landscape buffer instead of 20-foot landscape buffer. The buffers were installed at the correct width,but this was an error from the previous DA. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed modification to the Development Agreement with the V. modified provision listed in Section IV. B. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on April 22"d. 2025. At the public hearing,the Council moved to approve the subject Development Agreement Modification request. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing:. a. In favor: Eric Anderson b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: None d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Whether a vehicle repair, minor use is appropriate with the current use of the site; Council President Cavener was opposed to this use and felt it did not mix well with the current trampoline park on the premises._ 4, City Council change(s)to Staff recommendation; a. No formal changes were required,however. the City Council would like to see signage for drivers to watch out for pedestrians; FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -9- ProjectEXHIBITS A. to Project Overview) 1. Aerial Vil Legend F 0 Project Location Area of Impact 0 Analysis T PINE ¢ gel*-" i•iy - e f ■ �- i .w - . FINDINGSOF • • OF • ORDER FOR . 1 11 - 10- 2. Zoning . 1 . 1Legend ..■ • I� n �♦ ■ram+.0 • Project Location PINE "��' •� Area of Impact • Analysis • KII CD RUT V ■ �� „� FR�INKLIN ■■■■ , ■ J1.2 o�' ■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■� ■■■■ ■�■■■■■1 E1111q.P... 'f.. ■ .■■■u.11 itlatl- r�wry �/► moC • �C C.r.+ w rr ■■.� . 3. Future Land Use Legend Area of Im Analysis Ui �111 Ifil • ���• ■ ��=� Annul.,,..11■'�1'r .1� 4a��` �'■�1 >al�r�■ Q as Ila ��, , La► .al.+ i �� • 111 11 rF Px - - . i Goa 1�. Low DensitY c� w a o W J ■■■, ■�■ ■■■ FRAN KLI�N Residential �1111111 n q /1111111 �'=w r i •,. ■ .. is Medium Residential MU- FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER 84 /A • ' 1 11 4. Planned Development Map Legend I L�—i Project Location Area of Impact _. City Limits L Planned Parcels �— J I 1 Q Analysis - JT 1 {- ■ - _ J I I I 1 1 11 t- 1 I A f W fflVVV//J � 1■ r ,/ B. Subject Site Photos i z a FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) - 13- t C. Service Accessibility Report Overall Score: 36 77th Percentile Description Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel Flooelplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways Transit Within 1/4 mile of future transit route YELLOW Arterial Roa@1 tuildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walkinM Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School brivability Mieldle or Elementary School within 1 mile Oriving (existinM or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) - 15- D. Site Plan (a&e 328/2025) . J--------- -- - - -- - \ - - . ! : • : " m ~ §. . ■ - y96| R*m*G OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump _MD&- 2025001 1) - 16- E. Original Concept Plan Exhibit A: Proposed Conceptual Development Plan �.ieb •ti p4�.Rk 1150tl lYh-.4.y,-i Iw4y. . ��a R x .nA raMw - nuacruar — ers�u*anu S 6 �a mnrwu � tRw s,ncurirmr .. RF'.p�My�[ � 50�1Rf4�'1P gyry{y�4AE➢VH�L �. Pr]Tn/� $1VE4 efnkk.b { may} SW�[f.RRAR Mhnary �J� iL�QRW CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) - 17- F. New Concept Plan I Fir I a r t qP i Mb 9,� i•l I " + 1 - 9a - t FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) - 18- G. Existing Development Agreement ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARTIES- 1. City of Meridian 2. Babcock,L.L.C:.,an Idaho limited liatbilitycompuny, Ownedlcveloper ,1 11S A[7lll.:Tr DU TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is dated this day of .?yam—A� 2{116,{"ADIENVUM"), by and hctw,ccn City of 3vleridiatn,a municipal corponitilfn of the State of Idaho ("C]'TY"), whose address is 33 E. BFOadw-ay Avcnuie, ?v4eridian. Idaho 91642 and liaheoek, L.L.C.. an Idaho limited liability oonapam ('-9\VKF,R DEVELOrER"),whose address is 13791ti.Lloverdole Roid,Boiwi Idaho 83713, RECITALS A. CITYand*WNLR/UEVELnI'F.R entered into tha lc"in DL yelupmtml. Agmo nenl Thal was rixurdcd on JantLary 19,2611 in[liar meal property record%of Ms.County a, Instrument No, 111006191 ("1)FvC1:OPMChdT'AGREEMENT") B. CITY and OWNhIVIONFILOPF'R now desiiv is amend the T)"t4opmenl Agr(.A:mvnf, which terms have been approved by the Meridian City Council. in accordance wi th Waho C'(K14 SceliQrl 6?-6511. NOW,'fHl RE.FORls, in cowsi&rtalion of thv cuvCnxn6 and cundilians SO Iorlh herein,llic parties agree as follows: 1. C)VINI Ril}1:V1?i.UIxI;R Shull he found by the terms of Ilic original DevPlopmenl Agreement,except as specifically anieksded as fi)llows: S CONDITIONS GO VE'RNING DEVELOPMEW OFSUBJECT PROPERTY., 5.1 Oivner{Developer,ohell derelop the Property in accordance wllh the fbllnwiug slrrcial eanditdorrst 1, Fuluredereloproaentoflkis.sitrsbRllsrrbxtrrrrllrrllFcoinidy.p0hr ltecortcelrtrrq! rdevelnprrrenl plan inelm(led in Exhibit"A". The applicant.sirall incorporale a pedesirkit circirlatiotr lrinrr rhai pmvides htlerctninectivlty wiNrlo ehe pwpoker! rdevelop►nemj anrlperipslrirrpt cote neclratrs N E.Friorklin Road. Titeplam Shall be.srrbmined with the flrw certif ieate of amphlg eomplienee alrplicatiox. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) - 19- 2. Cerlrficcrte (+f Zoning Compliance and Adnrhrirrrative be.gign Keview applications are required fe) he subiniffeef to the Plrur>oing MyNirtment for approval of elffr(ture buddirigslwses oil eke site,prior to issuance of builAig permift 3. Direct access to E. Franklin Read is fimited to Ebel aecevs skopwr off the colocellrital ifeveloprtteol plan crppevwd with this application. Cross-access shall be provided to the property to the west{pureed Y.511177206.30)arrd tke property to fire east (parcel US]117110201)for fmorre A recorded ropy ofthe cross-access agreeurent(e).shall beprovi(W PoRk lhefrsl f_erlifleare of T,onfi g Compliance application. 4. Any exfstbrg dornectic well.sj%teroi wirftin this project shall be rerrloved from domestic service per City Irdlnance Section 9-1-4 and#4 A.Contact the Cky of Merldiau jEnglueering DCparfinene at (208)898-3500 for inspections of discarrrrec Lion of services. Wells way be aced for non-doniesticparposa .cmeh as lanrlseape rrrlgivaon J'oppeoverl by Idaho Department of Water Resources Coulace Robert B. Whieney at(208)334-2100. S, Atip existing sep c systenrs ►pithier this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9Ld-8,Cooeaef Ceneraf Tlislrirt Fleaffh for abattcforPmratprocrdwres arrd inspeceioirs(208)375-5211. G. The uses,rrlowerflrirrsrtflul to this agreement are.thane uses ullorvediFF the C- C zoning district fisted in Lf1C Table 11-28-2 except for the following: drinklirg estahlfshine.7ft,fuel sales facifio. mirror veNcfe repair, vehicle ►wishing facility, wireless communication facility and replete styes ■ud reirtafs. 7. All,f uhrre developirrerrr of die subject properly shall coirrlily will C iey aJ .4feridlon ordinwicex in effect at the time of development R. The developer/opuuerikirll he responsiblefor off vwih associaled with server and water service insrallatiotr. 9. The develoNWOwtter shall corrs7rnct ern 8 fain vinyl fence along the west barrrrdoey of the property and a f foot fence Char ozwehes ifte eriKting fence flint watches the ex sling ferfce at amit to the,southervr property boundary and ferminate on the western properry boundary rt the northeast cor+serr ofYbe Ender m7)perly(ParcelkR327,11.50110). The ownerldeveloper shall coord'iriate wick the i7djacent properiyowners on the constracrion of the recvperilpe frncev. 10, The ournel/rtevelcyw.r shall cowsirrrct it.357(oot wide street buffer adjarerrt to Franklin Road and n 24-fool landscape buffer rrlfifueal fo the we'.st feud .wwhern properly hermdary and a 5—fun rpide landscape buffer oil the cast property borrirdary in accordance nrith UDC 11-38-7 rud UDC.'11-,11E-9, 11.Any hrtildhrks along thesarrthera property boundary shall not exceed35feet in height to tiraintaiu cwnyrotlhlfify Nil1r the#dJaceut resiTlrerrialprvlirrda, FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -20- H. Proposed Revisions 1. Future development of this site shall substantially comply With the revised conceptual development plan dated March 256.2025,included in Section VI and the provisions contained herein.Ike apliearrt shall eratr a Pe4esfkaa circalatiet� prides 3 erne ee�i y-wig il}e�reges@4 �e aPA 2. Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review applications are required to be submitted to the Planning Department for approval of all fiiture imildingsiuses on the site,prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Direct access to E.Franklin Road is limited to the access shown on the conceptual development plan approved, ith this application.Cross-access shall be provided to the property to the',vest(parcel 0S11171.20630)and the prepeM.to the east(parcel ilS1117111201)for fiiture interconnectivity_A recorded cope of the cross-access agreement(s)shall be provided,,with the first Certificate of Zoning Compliance application_ 4. Any existing domestic well system within this project shall be removed from domestic service per City Ordinance Section 9-1-4 and 9 4 8,within 6 months after the date of annexation ordinance approval. Contact the City of Meridian Engineering Department at(208)P8-550$for inspections of disconnection of services.Wells may be used for non-domestic purposes such as landscape irrigation if approved by Idaho Department of Water Resources Contact Robert R.Whitney at(2*8)334-21.". 5. Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from service per City Ordinance Section 9- 14 and 94-8. 6. The uses allowed pursuant to this agreement are those uses allowed in the C-C zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2 except for the following- drinking establishments, fuel sales facility, vehicle washing facility,wireless communication facility,and vehicle sales anti rentals. 7. Bring the existine landscaping buffers and parking lot landscaping into conformity%kith UDC 11-33— 8. All 6iture development of the subject property shall comply with City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of development. 9. The developer/miner shall be responsiyle for all costs associated with server and water service installation- 10. The detieloperroctiner shall construct an 8-foot t7nyl fence along the west boundary of the property and a 6- foot fence that matches the existing fence that matches the existing fence adjacent to the southern property boundary and terminate on the western property boundary at the northeast corner of the Yoder Property (Parcel li R3273150119). The oiinerrdeveloper shall coordinate with the adjacent properl owners on the construction of the respective fences_ 11. The developerlovmer shall construct a 35-foot-aside street buffer adjacent to Franklin Road and a-10 25-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the west and soutlitm property boundary,and a 5-foot-wide landscape buffer on the east property boundary in accordance with L'DC 11-3B-7 and L'DC 11-3B-9. 121. Any buildings along the southern property boundary shall not exceed 35 feet in height to maintain compatibility with the adjacent residetitial properties_ FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Jump Time MDA—H-2025-0011) -21 - �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: School Resource Office (SRO) Agreement between City of Meridian and West Ada School District(WASD) for the 2025-2026 School Year SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MERIDIAN AND WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT: 2025-2026 SCHOOL YEAR This AGREEMENT, entered into by the City of Meridian, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "the City of Meridian," and Joint School District No. 2, dba West Ada School District, an Idaho school district and body corporate and politic of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "the District." WHEREAS, the District desires increased law enforcement, community support, outreach, and crime prevention services from the City, through the Meridian Police Department; and WHEREAS, the City of Meridian and the Meridian Police Department desire to provide such services to the District; and WHEREAS, the parties' mutual interests can be furthered through the use of the School Resource Officer (SRO) Program of the Meridian Police Department; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement shall be for the sole benefit of the District and the City and shall not be interpreted to benefit third parties. The relationship of the parties hereto is that of contractor and independent contractor, and it is expressly understood and agreed that each party and their officers, agents, and employees do not in any way, nor for any purpose, become a partner, agent, joint venture, servant, or employee of the other. 2. The City of Meridian, through the Meridian Police Department, shall provide School Resource Officer services at designated campuses, as referenced in Paragraph 3 below, including, but not limited to: investigating and preventing crimes against persons or property; identifying and arresting violators of state and local laws; filing investigative reports 1 and other required reports or documents; patrolling; and, to a limited extent, maintaining building security, controlling traffic, and enforcing traffic laws around schools. 3. The City of Meridian shall provide: a. Two (2) SRO Sergeants for supervision and as a single point of contact communication; b. Two (2) SRO Corporals for supervision; c. One (1) School Resource Officer at Mountain View High School; d. One (1) School Resource Officer at Meridian High School e. One (1) School Resource Officer at Rocky Mountain High School; f. One (1) School Resource Officer at Owyhee High School; g. One (1) School Resource Officer to cover the District office, Idaho Fine Arts Academy, and Renaissance High School; h. One (1) School Resource Officer at Victory Middle School; i. One (1) School Resource Officer at Meridian Middle School; j. One (1) School Resource Officer at Sawtooth Middle School; k. One (1) School Resource Officer at Lewis and Clark Middle School; I. One (1) School Resource Officer at Heritage Middle School m. One (1) School Resource Officer to cover Central Academy, Meridian Academy, Crossroads Middle School, Rebound School of Opportunity, and Pathways Middle School; and n. Five (5) School Resource Officers to cover District elementary schools. 4. As a professional service provider and de facto member of the school management team, the SRO shall endeavor to maintain open and regular communication with the assigned school principal and shall positively promote the school, staff, students, 2 and administration to the community. At the beginning of each school year the SRO shall meet with the principal to discuss the principal's expectations. In addition, on a weekly basis, the SRO shall meet with each principal or the principal's designee or provide an Activity Log indicating where and on what school activities the SRO was involved in during the prior week, unless the assigned principal does not request one. SRO personnel may also be requested to attend District meetings addressing school safety and security. 5. Prior to assignment to a school, SROs shall have basic SRO certification, or, in unexpected situations, shall obtain same within one (1) calendar year. SROs shall obtain ongoing training pertinent to their assignment, as such training is available. 6. The Meridian Police Chief and the District will determine how the officers performing the duties under this Agreement will be deployed, and the manner in which the services contemplated by the Agreement shall be provided. The Meridian Police Department will communicate to the assigned school principal whenever concerns or problems regarding scheduling, duties, or other items occur. Such communications shall also be copied to the District's Superintendent or designee. The interiors of buildings will not be patrolled by SROs except as is necessary to investigate crimes, apprehend criminal suspects and otherwise perform the duties contemplated herein; however, the SROs shall maintain high visibility with students during break and lunch periods. 7. The Meridian Police Chief and his officers shall have the right to exercise due discretion in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to the type, nature, extent, and result of any response or activity undertaken by the Meridian Police Chief and his officers. 8. With the exception of paragraph 8(b) below, the conduct of the Meridian Police Chief and his officers will be governed by the Meridian Police Policy Manual (hereinafter 3 "Manual"). In the event that the District's procedures conflict with the procedures set forth in the Manual, the provisions of the Manual shall prevail. b. District and Parental Notifications. Notwithstanding any other provisions herein to the contrary, the following procedures shall be used in all instances with regard to notifying the principal and/or a student's parents about the interaction of SROs with students: i. When an SRO interviews a student in the course of investigating a crime, the SRO shall notify the school principal, or designee, of the fact that an interview with the student was conducted, no later than the end of the school day in which the interview was conducted. ii. In the event that a student is arrested by an SRO or if the SRO finds it otherwise necessary to remove the student from school, the SRO shall immediately notify the principal of the school, or designee. iii. Upon receiving notice of any of the above circumstances from an SRO, the principal, or his or her designee, shall act in conformity with Section 33-6001(6), Idaho Code, and must notify a student's parent or guardian "if a student has been or may be questioned by a School Resource Officer or other law enforcement official, unless the child is a victim or suspected victim of physical child abuse." If the principal is aware of the intention of contact between the School Resource Officer and a student, a principal may, at the principal's sole discretion, notify the parent or legal guardian of the anticipated interview or contact. If contact is made, the principal may tell the parent or guardian of the student that a police officer questioned the student, removed the student from campus, or arrested the student, as the case may be, and may further state that additional information may be obtained by contacting the Meridian Police Department or if another enforcement agency is 4 involved of which the principal is aware the principal may then give the parent or guardian that information. iv. If a student's parent or guardian contacts the principal about interviews conducted by an SRO, the principal may disclose any information received by the principal from the SRO and may refer further questions to the Meridian Police Department or the correct law enforcement agency if another law enforcement agency is involved of which the principal is aware. 9. The City of Meridian shall use twenty (20) suitably trained police officers in meeting its obligation herein, eleven (11 ) of whom will be physically present at one of the high school and middle school campuses referenced in Paragraph 3 and five (5) of whom will share time between their assigned elementary schools, in accordance with a schedule that is mutually agreeable to the District and the Meridian Police Department. The other four (4) officers will provide supervisory or communications services. If scheduling conflicts occur causing an SRO to be off campus during a scheduled on-campus period, efforts will be made to provide prior notice and arrange with the assigned school principal to provide adequate coverage. If the SRO will be absent from the assigned school for a full or partial day the SRO shall notify the school principal in advance or as soon as practical. a. In the event the City of Meridian can recruit, train and retain additional personnel qualified to serve as School Resources Officers, the City will notify the District of such opportunities and the District and City may enter into an Addendum to this Agreement to provide for placement of additional School Resource Officers with the District. 10. During each annual performance evaluation of an SRO, the evaluating supervisor shall consult with the principal of the assigned school(s) in preparing the 5 evaluation. The evaluating supervisor may also seek input from the District's Superintendent or designee. 11. Meridian police officers providing additional services and police protection under the terms of this Agreement will wear the authorized uniform of the Meridian Police Department. 12. The parties recognize that the District may from time to time adopt policies, procedures, rules, and regulations affecting the conduct of persons present on the campuses referenced in Paragraph 3. To the extent that violation of those policies, procedures, rules, and regulations constitutes a violation of law, including breach of the peace, or a threat to public health or safety, those policies, procedures, rules, and regulations will be enforced by the Meridian Police Chief and his officers. To the extent that violation of those policies, procedures, rules, and regulations does not constitute a violation of the law, the Meridian Police Department is not required to take law enforcement action and will leave the enforcement thereof to the District. SROs shall inform the principal, or his designee, of violations of school policies, procedures, rules or regulations of which he/she has personal knowledge. 13. This Agreement is for a period commencing on or about August 14, 2025, and ending on or about May 23, 2026 in accordance with the District's Calendar. It is agreed under the terms of this Agreement that the SROs shall commence the duties set forth herein one (1) week prior to the first day of classes in August 2025, and will complete the obligations one (1) day after the last day of classes in May 2026. Should the parties wish to enter into an agreement for the City to provide SRO services to District during the 2026 summer school session, they shall negotiate and execute an addendum to this Agreement as set forth in Paragraph 25. 6 14. As consideration for the services provided by the City of Meridian pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the District shall pay the total sum of $968,231 .00 to the City of Meridian in two installments. One-half ($484,115.50) shall be paid on or before January 24, 2026, and the balance ($484,115.50) on or before May 30, 2026. 15. Security for events outside normal school hours will be reviewed and approved by the City of Meridian per the following steps: a. Special events. The District shall provide the Meridian Police Department with a list of special events and scheduled after-school activities for all schools within the city limits of Meridian at which the District is requesting law enforcement officers to be present. The Meridian Police Department shall provide a minimum of two police officers for each event. If an event should arise that is not on the original special event list provided by the District, the Community Service Division (CSD) SRO Sergeant shall attempt to provide two law enforcement officers to comply with the request. b. Record of time and reimbursement. SROs who attend a special event at their designated school and/or officers who work at special events at the request of a district school principal shall enter the event name and hours worked for the event in the City's Timecard system. C. Payment. The SRO Sergeant of the Meridian Police Department shall prepare and submit an invoice to the Meridian City Finance Department. The Meridian City Finance Department will invoice the individual school(s) hosting the special event(s) at which SROs or other officers worked at the end of each month. The school shall pay one-half(1/2) of the overtime pay due and owing an SRO who worked at the request of his/her designated school at the SRO's hourly overtime salary. The school or District shall pay Meridian Police Department standard overtime for all other required Meridian Police Department Officers. 16. The parties recognize that a school within the District may desire to have the Meridian Police Department provide additional security services for sanctioned school events. This agreement does not govern the provision of such additional security services. Additional security services for school events may be addressed in an addendum to this Agreement or in a separate agreement at a later date. 17. The District agrees to provide officers with adequate office space and suitable desks and chairs for the purpose of this Agreement. The District agrees to provide officers with a district-owned technology device (i.e., tablet or laptop) as well as access to the District's definition of Directory Information pursuant to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, relating to District enrolled students. 18. It is acknowledged by the parties that City of Meridian personnel acting pursuant to this Agreement are not the employees or agents of the District or schools within the District, but rather, they remain the employees of the City of Meridian. 19. Law enforcement personnel acting pursuant to this Agreement may be absent from their assigned campuses on holidays observed by the District. 20. It is acknowledged by the parties that District personnel acting pursuant to this Agreement are not the employees or agents of the City of Meridian, but rather, they remain the employees of the District. 21. Cancellation or suspension of Agreement. a. This Agreement may be cancelled by either party for non-conformance or poor performance, on thirty(30)days written notice. If the performance defect is corrected during the thirty (30) day period, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. If the City of Meridian terminates this Agreement due to the District's failure to timely correct the default in its performance, the District shall pay to the City of Meridian the consideration set 8 out in Paragraph 14, prorated to reflect the number of full or partial weeks in which services were actually performed by the City of Meridian. b. This Agreement may be cancelled or suspended by either party due to an Act of God, unforeseen occurrence, or any other event that renders performance impractical. For purposes of this Agreement, an Act of God shall include, but not be limited to: fire, hurricane, thunderstorm, snowstorm, flooding, disease, national or local emergency, act of terrorism or any other extreme emergency under which it is impractical for either party to perform. In the event of cancellation or suspension due to such circumstances, the District shall pay to the City of Meridian the consideration set out in Paragraph 14, prorated to reflect the number of full or partial weeks in which services were actually performed by the City of Meridian. 22. The Chief Operations Officer for the District has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the District and shall promptly bring this Agreement before the Board of Trustees for its ratification at a regularly scheduled meeting. 23. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of Idaho. 24. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and all other agreements, oral or written, are included in and merged herein. 25. This Agreement may be modified only by a mutually executed written addendum signed by the District's Chief Operations Officer and the Mayor of the City of Meridian. 26. The principal of each school shall, in writing, provide the Meridian Police Chief with a designee to contact in the event the SRO cannot contact the principal when so required pursuant to this Agreement. Each SRO shall also have the contact information for the District's Superintendent or designee. 9 27 Each party shall be solely liable for the actions and/or inactions, including errors, omissions, and/or negligence of its own employees. Neither party shall bear any responsibility or liability for the errors, omissions, and/or negligence of the other. 28. Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed via the United States mail, addressed as follows: Tracy Basterrechea David L. Roberts Chief of Police Chief Financial Officer Meridian Police Department West Ada School District 1401 E. Watertower Ave. 1303 E. Central Drive Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 29. The parties to this Agreement may enter into an addendum that provides the City of Meridian dispatch with access to school security cameras, solely in the event of an emergency as defined in such addendum. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. DATED this 3rd day of June 2025. CITY OF MERIDIAN: BY: _ Robert E. Simison 6-3-2025 Mayor BY: e*aasterrechea Chief of Police 10 ATTEST: Chris Johnson 6-3-2025 City Clerk WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT: By. David L. Roberts Chief Financial Officer B : ri Frasure Chair, Board of Trustees t� �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: License Agreement between the City of Meridian and Northwest Pipeline, LLC for temporary use of working space Mayor Robert E. Simison E I D City Council Members: IAN� Luke Cavener, President Liz Strader,Vice President A H Brian Whitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts TO: Mayor Robert E. Simison Members of the City Council FROM: Kyle Radek, Assistant City Engineer DATE: 5123125 SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WORKSPACE AGREEMENT WITH NORTHWEST PIPELINE LLC REQUESTED COUNCIL DATE: I. RECOMMENDED ACTION A. Move to: 1. Approve the temporary workspace agreement with Northwest Pipeline, LLC, and; 2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement II. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Kyle Radek—Assistant City Engineer 208-489-0343 Warren Stewart, City Engineer 208-489-0350 Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 208-985-1259 III. DESCRIPTION A. Background Northwest Pipeline is replacing a portion of their pipeline that includes a small portion of City property. The property was purchased for the construction of a future water storage facility. The pipeline includes an easement, however, Northwest Pipeline desires to work on a small area beyond the easement. In addition, they desire to use the access / ditch-rider road that crosses the City Page 1 of 2 property to access their work site. The City/Public Works will not be affected by the proposed use of the site and therefore does not oppose Northwest Pipeline's requests. B. Proposed Agreement The subject agreement grants Northwest Pipeline a temporary license to use the desired property and access road for their project. IV. IMPACT A. Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact to the City by entering into the agreement. Approved for Council Agenda: Page 2 of 2 LICENSE AGREEMENT CONCERNING TEMPORARY WORKING SPACE For Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, CITY OF MERIDIAN, an Idaho municipal corporation, whose address is 33 E. Broadway Ave, Meridian Idaho 83642 ("Licensor") does hereby grant to NORTHWEST PIPELINE LLC, a limited liability company, whose address is 650 S. Main Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 ("Licensee"), a temporary, non-exclusive license to use a portion of Licensor's property for the purpose of construction staging, parking, and access ("Temporary Working Space"), which property is situated in Ada County, State of Idaho, and more particularly described below: Assessor Parcel Number: S1131223350 The Temporary Working Space shall be limited to the access road and yellow cross-hatched area on Assessor Parcel Number S1131223350, all as depicted on Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. It is understood and agreed by Licensor and Licensee that the Temporary Working Space is to be used only in connection with Licensee's 2025 Pipeline Replacement Project. Upon completion of the above-described work and final restoration of the Temporary Working Space, this Agreement shall automatically terminate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensor may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason after providing thirty (30) days' notice to Licensee. Licensee agrees that within a reasonable time following the completion of its work and subject to weather, it will as near as practicable restore the Temporary Working Space to its original condition. Licensee will compensate Licensor for any unrepairable damages resulting from Licensee's work. Additional Construction Stipulations are attached hereto as Exhibit"B" and made part of this Agreement. Licensee shall maintain throughout the term of this Agreement liability insurance in which Licensor shall be named an additional insured in the minimum amounts as follows: General Liability - one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per incident or occurrence; Automobile Liability Insurance - one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per incident or occurrence; and Workers' Compensation Insurance - in the statutory limits as required by Idaho law. Licensee shall indemnify and save and hold harmless Licensor from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses caused or incurred by Licensee or any employee, agent, contractor, official, officer, servant, guest, invitee, successor, or assign of Licensee not caused by or arising out of negligent acts or willful misconduct of the Licensor. Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 18-8703, 67-2346, 67-2347A, and 67-2359, Licensee certifies: (1) it is not and will not for the duration of the Agreement be an abortion provider or affiliate abortion provider as those terms are defined in Idaho Code § 18-8702; (2) it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control; (3) it is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of the Agreement engage in, a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company (a) engages in or supports the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture, or (b) engages in or supports the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, as defined in Idaho Code § 18-3302(2)(d); (4) it is not currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not for the duration of the Agreement be owned or operated by the government of China; and (5) it will not assign or seek to assign the Agreement to a person who operates in violation of either statute. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters covered hereby and supersedes all prior agreements between them, written or oral. Except for termination as provided herein, this Agreement may be amended only by written agreement executed by both parties. No waiver of any right or remedy in the event of default hereunder shall constitute a waiver of such right or remedy in the event of any subsequent default. The laws of the State of Idaho shall govern this Agreement, and venue shall be Ada County, Idaho. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision hereof. If any controversy, claim, or action is filed or instituted to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement or arises from the breach of any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the other party all costs, damages, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party. WITNESS THE EXECUTION THIS 3rd day of June j 2025. Licensor: City of Meridian ATTEST: (Signature) (Signature) Robert E. Simison Mayor 6-3-2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 LICENSEE: NORTHWEST PIPELINE LLC QLerAa Marshall, Attot&y in Fact 2 r ;r r r YFl n y a 41 �: Tyr'.. . ' ai -n xF f r h Ne e._ W r r LEGEd ORAWNG Na. RRNE THE NORTHWEST 1400.o-MB SeuILTNIGNMENT EE BOISE DOT PIPELINE REPLACEMENT wut As ACCESS ROADS M.P.826.26 TO M.P.826.47 T-3N,R-1 E.S-31 Area APPROVED ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 6Y FOR PERMITTING Fl A"ROVEG FOR PERMITTING Area BY: KG DATE:03/19/2025 I AFPROOEDW once: 93 81 1400 1401 LC AR REPL S—F 2 WO C10rm7 OF EXHIBIT "B" ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION STIPULATIONS In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement,the Licensor and Licensee agree that all work associated with the natural gas pipeline facilities will be conducted in accordance with the following additional terns and conditions: 1. Licensee will notify Licensor of the commencement of work activity a minimum of seven (7) days prior to the start of work. 2. Licensee will perform its work activities in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and rules. 3. Licensee will remove all construction waste and debris after completion of construction activities. 4. Licensee will restore the Temporary Working Space as close to the original condition as is practicable after Licensee completes its work activities. 5. Licensee will re-seed disturbed areas with a seed mix native to the area or as specified by the Licensor. 6. Licensee will restore all access roads or driveways disturbed by construction to a condition equal to or better than existed prior to Licensee's work activities. Restoration will include final grading where necessary. 4 E IDIAN .---- IDAHO MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From . Kyle Radek, Public Works Meeting Date : TBD Presenter : Tyson Glock Estimated Time : 10 minutes Topic . Request from Dara Tong for Connection to the City Water and Sewer Systems Outside City Limits at 485 E Overland Road Recommended Council Action : Approve the request from Dara Tong for connection to the City Water and Sewer System with agreement to pursue annexation . Background . I . DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Tyson Glock - Staff Engineer II 208489 - 0358 Warren Stewart, City Engineer 208489 - 0350 Laurelei McVey, Director of Public Works 208 - 985 - 1259 II . DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST TO CONNECT Dara Tong is the owner of the building at 485 E Overland Road . The septic which serves the property has failed . The parcel is contiguous with the City. Both water and sewer services are available to the parcel, built as part of an ACHD road project in 2002 . Dara wishes to enter into an agreement with the City to connect to city water and sewer ASAP and pursue annexation . III . CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Mr. Tong' s request is governed by Meridian City Code sections 9 - 1 - 16 (as to the water connection request) and 94 - 26 (A) (as to the sewer connection request) . These provisions state that the City may grant a request to provide City water service to a ity limits if the requestor demonstrates a compelling health or property outside of c safety reason to do so . If this standard is met, the process established by Code is for Page I of 5 Public Works to bring the request to City Council and make a written recommendation regarding whether to allow the proposed connection . City Council , in the exercise of its discretion, may either grant or deny the request after review of the materials . If City Council grants the request, the property owner is to enter into an agreement with the City of Meridian for the provision of water service outside the city limits . In the agreement, the owner must agree to comply with City policies and codes ; to pay all applicable connection, assessment, and service fees ; to annex into the City when the parcel becomes contiguous to city limits ; not to change or intensify use of the property prior to annexation; and other reasonable conditions of granting the request to connect to the city water system that may be imposed by the City. IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Public Works staff consulted with other City staff to discuss any issues that would need to be addressed through an agreement in order to allow the connections requested . No staff were opposed to approving the request provided their concerns were addressed . • Public Works : Water and sewer services are both available at property and applicant will be required to hook up to both . • Parks : No comments . • Floodplain Administrator : No comments . • Planning . o As the property is already contiguous to City limits , Planning recommends a reasonable but relatively quick deadline for applying for annexation . o Per discussion from PREAPP - 2023 - 0151 regarding annexation of the property, a cross - access easement to the property to the east will be required if / when the property redevelops with a non - residential use . • Fire Department : No comments . • Police Department : No comments . Staff finds that Mr . Tong has demonstrated a compelling health and safety reason to connect water and sewer services to this parcel outside of city limits . For this reason, Staff recommends that City Council approve the request to connect to City water and sewer following execution of an agreement which includes requiring the owner to : • Pay for all construction required as well as all water and sewer assessments and applicable fees • Apply for annexation within 60 days of execution of the agreement • Consent to providing vehicular cross - access to the property to the east upon redevelopment • Decommission (Abandon) the onsite private well and septic system according to State law Page 2 of 5 i V. ALTERNATIVES A denial of this request would leave the owner in need of repairing or replacing their septic system . Having a septic system replaced when city sewer service is at the property would be physically difficult with limited space , economically unwise for the property owner and the City, and potentially impossible given the regulatory requirements of Central District Health . VI . TIME CONSTRAINTS The owner would like to secure an agreement with the City and proceed with connection and application for annexation as soon as possible . VII . LIST OF ATTACHMENTS • Email request from owner to hook up to City services • Map of parcel Approved for Council Agenda : Date . Page 3 of 5 ATTACHMENT 1 Email Request from Dara Tong for Connection to the City Water and Sewer Systems Outside City Limits From : Dara Tong < daramton� @gmail . com> Sent : Tuesday, May 20, 2025 3 : 50 PM To : Warren Stewart <wstewart@meridiancity. org> Subject : Emergency connection to the city External Sender . Please use caution with links or attachments . Hi Warren Stewart . My name is Dara Tong and my residence is 485 E Overland road . We have a septic tank and the drain is damaged . We ' ve had a truck come to pump out 34 times in 2 weeks and they have told me that we need to replace it . So far we ' ve had numerous issues with our plumbing and need to connect to the city's sewer and water system . Please , may you help me in connecting to the city's systems . I 've talked to Casey Crary and he has informed me to reach out to you . Thank you , Dara Tong Purge 4 of 5 ATTACHMENT • of 485 E Overland • 11 .4 rr O 0 0 i •� - � ✓ ` S 3 . i Ada County Recorder Trent Tripple 2025-034475 Boise,Idaho Pgs=6 vbailey 06/04/2025 11:37:43 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN IDAHO$0.00 Electronically Recorded RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Meridian 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,ID 83642 AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS: PARCEL NUMBER R3579000015,330 N. LINDER ROAD This AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS ("Agreement")is made this 3rd day of June , 2025 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose address is 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho ("City"), and Dara Tong, 485 E. Overland Road,Meridian,Ada County, Idaho ("User") (collectively, "Parties"). WHEREAS,User is the owner of parcel number S 1119212410, township/range/section 3N/lE/19,located at 485 E. Overland Road,Meridian,Ada County, Idaho ("Subject Property"), which real property is located outside of Meridian City limits; WHEREAS,Due to a failing septic tank system, User seeks to connect the Subject Property to the City water and sewer systems; WHEREAS,the City is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-323 to develop, operate, and maintain a domestic water system, and to protect the same from contamination, and the City does exercise such authority, including by the adoption and enforcement of Title 9, Chapters 1 and 4,Meridian City Code; WHEREAS,the City is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-332 to operate and maintain a domestic sewer system,and the City does exercise such authority,including by the adoption and enforcement of Title 9, Chapter 4,Meridian City Code; WHEREAS,User requests to connect the existing residence at Subject Property to the City water and sewer systems, and to disconnect and decommission (abandon)the private water well and private septic system at Subject Property; WHEREAS,the Subject Property is contiguous to the City limits; NOW,THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and in consideration of the recitals above, which are incorporated herein,the Parties agree as follows: I. COMMITMENTS BY CITY. AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS—485 E OVERLAND ROAD PAGE I OF 6 6 i A. Provision of Services. At all times relevant hereunder, City shall provide sewer and water services to the Subject Property, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any and all applicable laws and City ordinances. I B. Billing. City shall bill User monthly for water and sewer usage according to the metering, accounting, and billing system in place under Meridian City Code and the policies and practices of the City of Meridian. C. Recordation. City shall record this Agreement, and shall submit proof of such recording to User. k II.COMMITMENTS BY USER. r A. Payment for City services. User shall be responsible for fulfilling User's obligation to pay to City any and all costs related to sewer and water infrastructure construction, materials, and connection, including,but not limited to: hookup, assessment,meter u installation, and inspection fees. Upon connection to the City's water system,User shall pay to City all applicable fees and costs for water and sewer services provided, including, but not limited to use fees, as such are calculated and billed by City as set forth herein and established by law or City ordinance. The exclusive remedy for disputes, objections, n or appeals regarding such fees and charges shall be appeal to the Board of Adjustment under the procedures set forth in Meridian City Code. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,this provision shall be binding upon User and upon any and all successors in interest of User and/or to the Subject Property. B. No cross-connection. User shall abide by and comply with any and all applicable provisions of law,which shall specifically include, but shall not be limited to, compliance with Title 9, Chapter 3, Meridian City Code and/or any and all similar ordinances subsequently adopted,which prohibit the installation and/or maintenance of a cross- connection to the City's water system. C. Annexation. User hereby explicitly agrees to annexation of the Subject Property into the City of Meridian. User shall,within sixty (60) days of execution of this Agreement, and at User's sole expense, submit a complete application for annexation into the City of Meridian and connect any and all occupiable buildings then located upon the Subject Property to the City water and sewer system. Should User fail to submit such application,User acknowledges and agrees that City shall be authorized to shut off water to the Property and initiate the process of annexing the Subject Property, at User's sole expense, and, if necessary, to assess all costs and fees related to such annexation against the utility account for the Subject Property. User further acknowledges and agrees that User's failure to pay any utility bill due and owing, including any portion for annexation costs and fees,may result in disconnection of water services to the Subject Property and/or debt collection proceedings or other civil remedies. D. Decommissioning (Abandonment)of private well and septic system. Upon connection and provision of City water service to the Subject Property,User shall disconnect and discontinue the use of any and all private water wells and/or other water sources available on the Subject Property other than the City water system.Upon connection and provision AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS-485 E OVERLAND ROAD PAGE 2 OF 6 of City water and sewer service to the Subject Property, but no later than one hundred and eighty (180) days following execution of this Agreement,User shall properly decommission the existing domestic well and any and all septic systems available on the Subject Property according to State law, including utilizing a licensed well driller for the work or receiving a waiver to that requirement from the Director of the Department of Water Resources. User shall provide a copy of the driller's report describing the decommissioning procedure to the City. E. Development agreement. a. User acknowledges that,pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A and the Meridian Unified Development Code ("UDC"), as part of the annexation process, User will be required to enter into a development agreement concerning the use or development of the Subject Property. Such development agreement will include requirements that the use of the Subject Property comply with all provisions of the UDC and Meridian City Code, including those provisions related to land use, specific use standards, landscaping, access, parking, and other conditions as may be appropriate and necessary to carry out the policies of the comprehensive plan,regulate the uses of property and structures within the City of Meridian, and protect and promote public health, safety, and general welfare. b. User acknowledges and agrees that if User or a subsequent property owner redevelops the property with a non-residential use in the future,User shall grant a cross-access easement for access to and from the adjacent property to the east and shall submit a copy of the recorded easement to the Meridian City Planning Division with the future Certificate of Zoning Compliance. F. Consent to entry. User shall, and hereby does,provide perpetual consent and access to the City to enter the Subject Property for the purpose of inspecting any and all water and sewer pipes, connections, and related infrastructure. Except as to routine meter readings or in the event of an imminent or realized threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, City shall attempt to provide User at least twenty-four(24)hours prior notice of such entry; such notice may be verbal or written and may be posted at the Subject Property. III.GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Default. Any failure to perform the terms and conditions of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, shall be a default hereunder. In the event of a default,the non-defaulting party may serve a written Notice of Default upon the defaulting party by the method set forth herein. Except in case of an imminent or realized threat to the public health, safety, or welfare,the defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days following delivery of such notice to cure or correct the default before the non-defaulting party may seek any remedy as provided herein. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this provision shall be binding upon the Parties and upon any and all successors in interest thereof. B. Enforcement. This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS-485 E OVERLAND ROAD PAGE 3 OF 6 jurisdiction by either City or User, or any respective successor(s) in interest thereof. An action at law or in equity, as appropriate, shall lie to secure specific performance of any covenant,agreement,condition,commitment,and/or obligation set forth herein. In addition,remedies available to City shall include,but shall not be limited to,termination of water and/or service to User and/or to any successor(s) in interest. C. Notices. Any notice desired by the Parties or required by this Agreement shall be deemed delivered after deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: City: City of Meridian Attn: Public Works Department Director 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 User: Dara Tong 485 E. Overland Road, Meridian, Idaho 83642 Either Party may change its address for the purpose of this section by delivering to the other Party written notification of such change, establishing a new address for noticing purposes,in accordance with the requirements of this section. D. Time is of the essence. The Parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition, and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach and default hereunder by the Party so failing to perform. E. Binding upon successors. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein,this Agreement shall be binding upon any and all owners of the Subject Property, any and all subsequent owners thereof, and each and every other person acquiring an interest in the Subject Property. Nothing herein shall, or shall be construed to, in any way prevent the sale or alienation of the Subject Property, or any portion thereof,except that any sale or alienation shall occur subject to the provisions of this Agreement, and any successive owner or owners shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed. F. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed to be excised herefrom and the invalidity thereof shall not affect any other provision or provisions contained herein. G. Attorney fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted,to court costs and reasonable attorney fees as determined by such court. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the Parties and shall survive,inter alia, any default,termination, or forfeiture of this Agreement. H. Final Agreement. This Agreement sets forth all promises, inducements, agreements, conditions, and understandings between City and User relative to the subject matter AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS-485 E OVERLAND ROAD PAGE 4 OF 6 hereof, and there are no promises, agreements, conditions, or understandings, either oral or written, express or implied, between City and User, other than as are stated herein. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein,no subsequent alteration, amendment, change, or addition to this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties unless set forth in writing and duly executed by both Parties or their successors in interest. I. Non-waiver. Failure of either Party to promptly enforce the performance of any term of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any Party's right to thereafter enforce such term, and any right or remedy hereunder may be asserted at any time after either party becomes entitled to the benefit thereof, notwithstanding delay in enforcement. All rights and remedies herein enumerated shall be cumulative and none shall exclude any other right or remedy allowed by law. Likewise,the exercise of any remedy provided for herein or allowed by law shall not be to the exclusion of any other remedy. J. Compliance with laws. Throughout the course of this Agreement,the Parties shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. The City's ordinances appertaining to the regulation,control,and use of its sewer and water systems,and any prospective amendments to and/or recodifications thereof, are specifically and without limitation incorporated into this Agreement as if set forth fully herein. K. Advice of attorney. Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement,it has received independent legal advice from its attorney or the opportunity to seek such advice. L. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City Council of the City of Meridian. Signature lines on follow ingpage. AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS-485 E OVERLAND ROAD PAGE 5 OF 6 i IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the Effective Date first written above. USER: STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss: County of ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this -L�day ofj Dara Tong /%4 pLA4 ,2025,before the undersigned,a Notary p blic in the State of Idaho,personally appeared Dara Tong,known or identified to me •• �� S T'' IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand ,c'r►, `:'� and affixed my official seal,the day and year in this 'COMMISSION 1 or first above written. No.2022MM •'. VIDN 0' Not ry ublic for Id Residing at nj e-r L.CLLG.y Idaho My Commission Expires: �p CITY OF MERIDIAN: Attest: BY: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 Robert E. Simison,Mayor 6-3-2025 STATE OF IDAHO ) ):ss County of Ada ) On this 3rd day of June 2025,before me,a Notary Public,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson,know or identified to me to be the Mayor and Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian, who executed the instrument or the person that executed this instrument of behalf of said City,and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. Notary Public for I ho Residing at eridian Idaho My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE OUTSIDE MERIDIAN CITY LIMITS—485 E OVERLAND ROAD PAGE 6 OF 6 C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution No. 25-2519: Accepting Student Artwork for Traffic Box Art Wraps Traffic Box Art Wraps Amelia Reese, BeoutifulStors Primary ElementarV • • _ Amelia Reese Title of Artwork:_ Beautiful • rs - - • de: 2nd R Eagle �1K Levi Nielson , Sockeye Salmon Swimming . Intermediate Elementary Award: Levi Nielson • Title of Artwork: Sockeye Salmon Swimming �~ • Grade: 5t" Grade u • School: Hunter Elementary :t Sa iy a Hasham , Farm _ - Middle School Award: - Sadiya Hasham Title of Artwork: Form Grade: 7tn School: Idaho Fine Arts Academy ti � - Emily Sloan , Me-scelloneo ' High School 2-D Award: Y �® Emily Sloan y • Title of Artwork: Me-scellanea Grade: 12th • Mountain View High School Ari O' Reilly, Chute High School Photo Award: �r Ari O'Reilly • Title of Artwork: Chute .- r • Grade: 111n • School: Rocky Mountain High School yT ti Mackayla Coon , Boise River Mayor's Choice Award: Mackayla Coon r :y. • Title of Artwork: Boise River ,f • Grade: 5tn • School: Pleasant View Elementary r a a.. C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: City of Meridian Financial Report-April 2025 City of Meridian Monthly Financial Report FY2025 Apr-25 Table of Contents Report Name Page Number Investment Graphs 2 Fund Balance 3 I- I 11 ro CYNE rr-rr "t i E. of i F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25 -7 Apr Council Report Monthly Financial Report �E IDIAN FY2025 Apr-25 0 0 0 0 Yield by Investment Type 439% 3.84% 41 0.00% FIB 4.55% •FIB MoneyMarket$5,285,823 •Cash$21,580,147 MONEYMARKET •Idaho Bond Fund$78,277,402 •Idaho State Pool$116,888,169 City of Meridian Interest/Investment Income City of Meridian Cash/Investments Balance by Major Fund by Major Fund $4,000,000 $130,000,000 $3,500,000 $125,000,000 — $3,000,000 $2,500,O0o $120,000,000 $2,000,000 $115,000,000 $1,500,000 $110,000,000 $1,000,000 $105,000,000 $500,000 $100,000,000 $0 General Enterprise $95,000,000 General Fund Enterprise Fund ■Total Budget ■Actual YTD ■FY25 ■FY24 F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25-7 Apr Council Report 2 of 3 Monthly Financial Report FY2025 IDIAN*-- Apr-25 I IO 4/1/2025 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 — oil I I $20,000,000 `r 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 ■Nonspendable ■Restricted ■ ■Assigned ■Assigned Reserves ■Unassigned ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 — - $20,000,000 9/30/2016 9/30/2017 9/30/2018 9/30/2019 9/30/2020 9/30/2021 9/30/2022 9/30/2023 9/30/2024 F:\Reporting\Monthly Reports\FY2025\FY25-7 Apr Council Report 3 of 3 E IDIAN�- )AH AGENDA ITEM Department Reports SH DKS AssociatesProject ManagerLeah Kelsey, PE, PTOEITD District 3Senior PlannerWasdahlMark Orchard Avenue to Overland Road 69 Corridor Traffic Study- Overview Public Feedback•Special Considerations•Proposed Vision•Crash History•Existing and Future Traffic•Study Process and Schedule•PurposeStudy Background and • Background and Purpose Increased crashes and delay times Increased development and trafficwidened in 1990’s and early 2000’s69 from Kuna to Meridian was -SH• Background and Purpose for bicyclists and pedestrians Provide safe facilities and crossings and off the corridorAllow safe and efficient access on corridorKeep traffic moving throughout the The corridor vision will: • Process and Schedule Final traffic study report•July 2025•Agency presentations•we are hereMay/June 2025 •21)-Online PIM (April 7•Technical team meeting to review proposed vision and PIM•Spring 2025•ITD selects full access scenario •Fall 2024 to Winter 2025•Technical team met to discuss scenarios•July 2024•corridor scenariosAdopted 2050 CIM forecasts were reevaluated with three •Summer 2024•Three scenarios identified by ITD•Rescoping, negotiations, and agreement•Spring 2023 to Spring 2024• Existing and Future Traffic Rd of plans to extend Meridian Rd south of Kuna between Kuna Rd and Orchard Ave because decrease 29% Traffic is projected to •between Overland and Victory roadsincrease 108% Traffic is projected to • Existing and Future Traffic 84 to Kuna (Orchard Ave)-8 miles from I• Crash History (2019 69-SH impaired3 fatal crashes were drug/alcohol •1 at Kuna curve•1 between Columbia and Hubbard•2 at Victory•1 at Calderwood•5 fatal crashes•related crashes-518 intersection•69-57 9 crashes on SH•2023)- Crash History (2019 69-SH(reference: 2021 ITD Safety Corridor Analysis) in Idaho compared to similar corridors greater frequency of crashes 69 have a -Most segments of SH•(reference: 2023 ITD Traffic Crashes Report) 31% for all roadways in 2023than Idaho statewide rate of (injury + fatal) which is greater 47% of crashes are serious •in north end of corridorHigher concentration of crashes •2023)- Proposed Vision: Overland Rd to Kuna Rd at all intersections/access pointsturn lanes -rightAdd •on each sideuse pathway -foot multi-10bufferedAdd a •out-in and right-rightOther access onto the highway will be •intersectionsmile -mile and 1/2-1highway will only be allowed at Access onto the . continuous raised mediannew Install a •seven lanes69 from five lanes to -Widen SH• Cross section“Rural” drainage with preferred roadside swales Overland Rd to Kuna Rd• Right easementsturn lanes may require additional R/W or -Drainage and right•Fit within existing R/W where possible•foot R/W Needed-Minimum 122•140’ existing R/W-125’•Way-of- Proposed Vision: Kuna Rd to Orchard Ave at all intersections/access pointsturn lanes -rightAdd •and Kuna Rdon each side between Kay Aveuse pathway -foot multi-10Add a •and Kay AveAveon each side between Orchard foot attached sidewalk -7Add a •five continuous lanesWiden Avalon Street to • Cross section“Rural” drainage with preferred roadside swales Kuna Rd to Kay Ave• Cross section site stormwater treatment-off“Urban” drainage with curb, gutter and Kay Ave to Orchard Ave• Intersection and Roadway Features Eagle Road at The Village Turns)-350 U-(allows for F 18’ raised median • Pedestrian and bicycle facilities Boulevard near Linder RoadChinden foot buffer-use path with minimum 8-foot detached multi-10•69 segment-SH•use path east of Kay Ave-foot existing/future multi-10•foot attached sidewalks-7•Avalon Road segment• Pedestrian and bicycle facilities Local RoadMile-1/2 Signalized as needed•stage pedestrian crossings-Single• Special Considerations of slopeExisting R/W at top Existing R/W at fenceMeridian Road south of Harris Street Limited R/W or steep cut/fill slopes• Special Considerations pathway with retaining wallsprotected pathways or “tiered” -May require barrier•Limited R/W or steep cut/fill slopes• Special Considerations Future Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study?•Kuna Curve intersection (Meridian Road extension)• Special Considerations 84 SPUI.-with future study that includes the Icapacity intersection needed. To be determined -High•Overland Road Intersection• What other design options intersectionsmile -decreasing delays at the 1mile intersections, -to the ½intersections by rerouting vehicles mile -traffic volumes at the major 1The full access option reduces RIRORIRO+LIFull Access Travel Time Comparison Travel Time (min)PM PeakAM PeakSBNBSBNB20181614121086420 of each otherwithin 1 minute or less with travel times being performed similarly, All three options •mile-located at the ½RIRO intersections –#2 •mile-the ½intersections located at In-RIRO+Left–#1 •were considered? What was the public response?16% remained neutral29% did not support55% of participants expressed supportReaction to Proposed Visionvia email or phone call18 people gave comments •submittedwere 135 comment forms •the online meeting siteOver 1,900 people visited • What was the public response?Raised median will limit access•Acceleration and deceleration lanes should be added•Expressway should be considered•–Added number of signalized intersections •84 interchange*-No plan for improvements at Overland Road & I•Concerns/Dislikes•Overall safety improvement•hand turn lanes-Right•Raised median to increase safety•use pathway-Buffered multi•Widening and increased capacity•standard intersection*Converting Kuna curve into a •Support/Likes• What was the public response?Speed limit changes•communityLoss of rural environment and •Poor access at Calderwood Dr•and request for mitigationConcern about increasing noise •U and Roundabouts-ThruWould like ITD to reconsider CFI, •Other Notable Comments• Next steps?expected by June 2025 (KN 24818)agreement with Brighton Development; completion In February, IT Board approved staff to pursue a STAR •A regular maintenance project is scheduled for 2029•year budget for these improvements-sevenThere is currently no funding identified in ITD’s •Complete Traffic Study Report• Thank You! Questions?Leah.Kelsey@dksassociates.comDKS AssociatesProject ManagerLeah Kelsey, PE, PTOEMark.Wasdahl@itd.idaho.govITD District 3Senior PlannerWasdahlMark Contact us with any questions E IDIAN�- )AH AGENDA ITEM Department Reports E IDIAN; AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Legal Department Discussion: Request from Ada County and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District to Enter into Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements Concerning Capital Improvements Plans C� (IEAI MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Work Session From: William L. M. Nary, City Attorney and Meeting Date: June 3, 2025 Kurt Starman, Deputy City Attorney Presenter: Kurt Starman, Deputy City Attorney Estimated Time: 20 minutes Topic: Request from Ada County and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District to Enter Into Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreements Concerning Capital Improvements Plans Recommended Council Action: Discuss a request from Ada County ("County") and the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District ("District") to enter into the attached agreements ("Agreements") concerning the capital improvements plans ("CIPs") that are necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. Background: The County and District wish to adopt countywide development impact fees to partially fund coroner-,jail-, and EMS-related capital improvements associated with new development.The proposed fees,which total $750 per single-family housing unit,would be similar to the development impact fees collected by the Ada County Highway District.Unlike ACHD, however, the County and District cannot collect development impact fees within the incorporated cities without each city's participation. In order to proceed, every incorporated city must: (1) enter into intergovernmental agreements with the County and District; (2) adopt the CIPs; and (3) adopt an ordinance. The City Council received a presentation about this proposal on December 17, 2024 and discussed a four-step implementation plan, as follows: 1. Enter into Agreements with the County and District that only address the CIPs at this time. The Agreements do not require the City to adopt the CIPs, nor do they require the City to adopt countywide development impact fees. Rather, the City would simply agree to consider the CIPs. 2. If the Agreements are approved, the City would then consider the CIPs in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. The basic steps are as follows: a. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee ("County DIFAC") would forward its written comments to the City in accordance with the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act. b. The Planning and Zoning Commission would conduct a public hearing concerning the CIPs and forward its recommendation to the City Council. c. The City Council would conduct a public hearing and make its determination. If adopted,the CIPs would be added to the City's Comprehensive Plan.The City would not require an application fee to process the Comprehensive Plan amendment given the City's direct involvement. 3. If the City adopts the CIPs, it would then pause until all the other cities have adopted (a) the CIPs and (b) the ordinances necessary to collect countywide development impact fees. 4. If all the other cities timely adopt the CIPs and necessary ordinances,the City would then consider adopting an ordinance to collect countywide development impact fees.A successor intergovernmental agreement would also be necessary at that time.As noted above, however,the City is not obligated to adopt countywide development impact fees. As background, some of the "high-level" topics from the December 17, 2024 City Council meeting included: 1. This will likely be the first countywide development impact fee program in Idaho, so it would be prudent to proceed judiciously. 2. Ideally,the process to implement countywide development impact fees would be similar to the process utilized by ACHD, but that is not possible due to legal constraints (including limiting language in the Idaho Constitution concerning county ordinances). 3. The City will likely want to utilize the County DIFAC as the advisory committee for the proposed countywide development impact fees, since the County DIFAC and County staff have the requisite knowledge and expertise concerning coroner-,jail-, and EMS-related facilities. 4. Coroner-related facilities are not explicitly delineated in Idaho Code section 67-8203(24)(0, so it may be prudent to seek clarification from the Legislature. 5. The County may implement development impact fees for sheriff-related facilities without action by the incorporated cities. The attached Agreements are substantially similar to the draft agreements the City Council reviewed on December 17, 2024. If the City Council is receptive to proceeding with the first step of the implementation plan outlined above, the Agreements will be placed on a future agenda for formal action. Attachments - Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements - Ada County Emergency Medical Services District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for District System Improvements Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 AGREEMENT NO. 30465 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A & 67-23281 Parties to Agreement: Ada County County Ada County Board of Commissioners 200 W. Front Street, Third Floor Boise, Idaho 83702 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 8, 2025 ("Effective Date")by and between Ada County("County") and the City of Meridian("City")as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plans ("CIPs") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 1 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plans for County System Improvements. 1.4 Capital Improvements Plans and/or CIPs: Means and refers to, collectively, the May 24, 2024 Jail Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study and the May 24, 2024 Coroner Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study, all of which were prepared for and adopted by the County. 1.5 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.6 City- Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.7 County: Means and refers to Ada County, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.8 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the County and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.9 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.10 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIPs. The CIPs are intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development, protect the public health, safety, and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers, privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the County and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. 2.4. The County is responsible for providing coroner-and jail-related services on a countywide basis. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4DO7-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 2.5. The County is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the County's ability to provide coroner- and jail-related services are affected by said development. 2.6 The County has provided the City with the CIPs, which were prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIPs in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3) and 67-8208(1). 2.8 The County has requested that the City adopt the CIPs in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however, that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIPs. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIPs and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The County shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee shall serve as an advisory committee to the Ada County Board of Commissioners and City Council and is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The County shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIPs with the City on or before June 30, 2025, to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIPs prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID: FABOAEE2-4D07-4387-AC1B-A977DEDE1013 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of Ada County Commissioners DocuSigned by: 4/8/2025 14:16 PM MDT By: Rod Beck, Commissioner DocuSigned by: By: 4/9/2025 1 2:14 PM MDT Ryan Davidson, Commissioner DocuSigned by: ���--- 4/10/2025 1 12:21 PM MDT By: —67 Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: DocuSigned by: 4/10/2025 1 2:38 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of:Meridian By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-3-2025 ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 ADA COUNTY AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANS FOR COUNTY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 7 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB AGREEMENT NO. 30708 ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS [Idaho Code §§ 67-8204A & 67-2328] Parties to Agreement: Ada County Emergency Medical District Ada County Emergency Medical Services District Services District Attn:Director 370 N. Benjamin Ln. Boise, Idaho 83704 City of Meridian City City of Meridian Attn: City Clerk 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, Idaho 83642 THIS ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ("Agreement") is entered into this date of April 22, 2025 ("Effective Date") by and between the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District ("District") and the City of Meridian("City") as an intergovernmental agreement as provided for in Idaho Code § 67- 8204A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration hereby acknowledged by the Parties to this Agreement, the Parties hereby mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS For all purposes of this Agreement, the following terms have the definitions as herein provided in this Section unless the context of the term clearly requires otherwise: 1.1 Act: Means and refers to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Chapter 82, Title 67, Idaho Code as it may be amended or restated from time to time. 1.2 Advisory Committee: Means and refers to the Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee, which shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the Capital Improvements Plan ("CIP") and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 1 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 1.3 Agreement: Means and refers to this Ada County Medical Services District and City of Meridian Intergovernmental and Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Capital Improvements Plan for District System Improvements. 1.4 Board: Means and refers to the Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District. 1.5 Capital Improvements Plan and/or CIP: Means and refers to the May 24, 2024 EMS Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study,which was prepared for the District and adopted by the Ada County Board of Commissioners. 1.6 City: Means and refers to City of Meridian, Idaho, Party to this Agreement. 1.7 City Council: Means and refers to the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho. 1.8 District: Means and refers to the Ada County Medical Services District, Party to this Agreement. 1.9 Party/Parties: Means and refers to the District and/or the City, as the Parties in this Agreement, depending upon the context of the term used in this Agreement. 1.10 Service Area: Means and refers to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67- 8203(26). Said Service Area shall encompass the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. 1.11 System Improvements: Means and refers to capital improvements to public facilities designed to provide service to a service area as defined in the Act at Idaho Code § 67-8203(28). SECTION 2 PURPOSES&AUTHORITY 2.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a structure that will enable,but not require,the City to adopt the CIP.The CIP is intended to promote and accommodate orderly growth and development,protect the public health,safety,and general welfare of residents countywide, and to further the best interests of the Parties. 2.2 Idaho Code § 67-2328 authorizes public agencies in Idaho to exercise jointly any power, privilege, or authority authorized by the Idaho Constitution, statute, or charter. The Parties, each being a public agency, hereby agree to exercise jointly their respective powers,privileges, and authorities in accordance with Title 67, Chapter 82, Idaho Code. 2.3 Idaho Code § 67-8204A provides that the District and City have authority to enter into an intergovernmental agreement for the purpose of developing joint plans for capital improvements. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 2 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB 2.4. The District is responsible for providing emergency medical services on a countywide basis. 2.5. The District is experiencing considerable growth and development, and the District's ability to provide emergency medical services is affected by said development. 2.6 The District has provided the City with the CIP, which was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8208 in consultation with the Advisory Committee as provided in Idaho Code §§ 67-8205 and 67-8206(2). 2.7 The Ada County Board of Commissioners has adopted the CIP in accordance with Idaho Code §§ 67-8206(3)and 67-8208(1). 2.8 The District has requested that the City adopt the CIP in accordance with the Act, and the City is willing to consider said request. The Parties acknowledge and agree, however,that the City Council cannot and shall not be bound by this Agreement to adopt the CIP. 2.9 That by reason above stated, the Parties have determined it is necessary and desirable to enter into this Agreement. SECTION 3 ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3.1 Advisory Committee. The Ada County/Ada County Ambulance District Development Impact Fee Advisory Committee shall serve as the development impact fee advisory committee pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8205(3) to prepare and recommend the CIP and any amendments, revisions, or updates of the same. 3.1.1 Administration and Staffing. The District,in cooperation with Ada County,shall provide for the administration and staffing of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Committee members shall be appointed in accordance with the requirements of Idaho Code § 67-8205. 3.1.2 Charge. The Advisory Committee is charged with the responsibilities set forth in Idaho Code § 67-8205(4). 3.1.3 Written Comments. The District shall cause the Advisory Committee to file its written comments concerning the CIP with the City on or before June 30, 2025, to provide the City with ample time to consider the CIP prior to the termination of this Agreement. ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 3 Docusign Envelope ID: BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB SECTION 4 SERVICE AREA 4.1 Idaho Code § 67-8203(26) provides that the Parties can identify a geographic area by an intergovernmental agreement in which specific public facilities provide services to development within that geographic area on the basis of sound planning or engineering principles or both. 4.2 The CIP and this Agreement define the Service Area as the entirety of Ada County, including all the incorporated cities. SECTION 5 COSTS SPECIFIC TO DISTRICT 5.1 The District shall pay the following costs: 5.1.1 All costs associated with the Advisory Committee; and 5.1.2 All District costs associated with drafting this Agreement and any amendment or termination of the same; and 5.1.3 All costs associated with the District's performance of this Agreement; and 5.1.4 All legal costs and fees associated with any action brought by a third party concerning the validity of the CIP or this Agreement. SECTION 6 CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 After the Advisory Committee files its written comments concerning the CIP with the City in accordance with the Act and Section 3.1.3 of this Agreement,the City shall consider the adoption of the CIP in accordance with the Act. 6.2 If the City adopts the CIP, the City agrees to consider the possibility of adopting a City ordinance concerning the countywide development impact fees delineated in the CIP, but only after (a) the Parties negotiate and agree on a new intergovernmental agreement for that purpose and(b)all the incorporated cities in Ada County have adopted(1)the CIP and (2) the ordinances necessary to implement countywide development impact fees. 6.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that: 6.3.1 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring the City to adopt the CIP; and ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS—PAGE 4 Docusign Envelope ID:BA7D20D4-FF43-4A5F-B344-F63EF9A79AAB IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. Board of the Ada County Emergency Medical Services District DocuSigned by: By: L 902-RF464 6��� 4/22/2025 1 3:25 PM MDT R A Beek, Commissioner DocuSigned by: By: 4/23/2025 1 12:06 PM MDT Ryan Davidson, Commissioner DocuSigned by: -;4 --04 4/22/2025 1 3:58 PM MDT By: Thomas Dayley, Commissioner ATTEST: DocuSigned by: 4/23/2025 1 4:16 PM MDT Trent Tripple, Ada County Clerk City of Meridian By: Mayor Robert E. Simison 6-3-2025 ATTEST: Chris Johnson, City Clerk 6-3-2025 ADA COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT AND CITY OF MERIDIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AND JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CONCERNING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR DISTRICT SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS —PAGE 7 E IDIAN�- )AH AGENDA ITEM Department Reports Response Deployment Model Analysis rd Council Meeting, June 3City -Meridian Fire Department Four Deployment grant firefighters)staffing (included are SAFER staffing beyond current level of •Options Four Alternative Deployment Options staffing on trucks as applicable.person -engines and fourperson staffing on -Threestation four and station five. person squad at -Adding a twoas applicable. person staffing on trucks -fourperson staffing on engines and -person staffed truck. Three-staffed engine and a fourperson -station one with a threecompany staffing at -Multistaffing on trucks as applicable.person -on engines and fourperson staffing -engine. Threeperson staffed -Road with threeRiver Valley Road and Eagle A new fire station located at at eight fire stations person staffed apparatus -Four Key Performance 11:00 -force (ERF)Arrival of an effective response •8:00-callFirst arriving apparatus to Fire •7:50 -callFirst arriving apparatus to EMS •GoalsMetric Criteria Effective Response Force Arrival of Improved outcomes on CPR resuscitation efforts(ladders, forcible entry, -Reduced physical strainOSHA standard achieved with one apparatus (2in/2out)weather rehabilitation during long incidents or inclement More personnel allows for better rotation for person crews-person verses 3-faster 4NIST study shows critical tasks are completed 25% sooneron scene personnel more Effective Fire preserve belongings of ownersProtect and -Salvage Goalleaveelements of fire remain when we Ensure no -Overhaul Goaloccupants are out of buildingEnsure all -Rescue Goalfire to room of originContain the -Containment Goal FireControl of Building Effective Fire Control 2024 -Three years of fire response data: 2022 time30% of the -Response Area in under 11:00 minutesArrival of ERF at a Building Fire in Meridian of the time63% -Meridian Response Area in under 8 minutesFirst arriving Fire Apparatus at a Building Fire in of a Building Fire 0%Chances of Survival –Fire Impact Chances of Survival Damage PercentagePercentage Ratio 90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0 80%60%40%20% *Months Displaced –Fire Impact Months Displaced Damage Percentage 100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0 9121618181818123I 0 *Cost to Repair-Fire Impact Cost to Fix Damage PercentagePercentage Ratio 100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0 160%140%120%100%80%60%40%20%0% Four Person Improved outcomes on EMS callsperson crew-4-5:38•person crew -3-7:46•victim removal 27% increase in time savings for person crew-4-2:44•person crew -3-4:45•74% increase in time savings to Staffing Improved EMS Medication administration •Airway management•up-AED set•Chest compression•CPR performance Assistance in critical transportsVehicle extrication•lifting and moving patients•Division of labor Outcomes New Fire Station on Eagle Rd ERF- Fire ModerateFirst Due- Non - EMS CallFirst Due- EMS Call Scenario 2 -Performance Improvement (Total and by Station) Percent Increase 8Station7Station6Station5Statio n4Station3Station2Station1StationAreaStationTotal876543210000.10.14.16.80.23.22.500001.96.600.41.5000026.900.41.6 established in perpetuity Location and property •response areaStation’s 1, 3 and 4 Adds to ERF performance •Meridianperformance in Northeast Increased first due • Muti ERF- Fire ModerateFirst Due- Non - EMS CallFirst Due- EMS Call Scenario 3-Performance Improvement (Total and by Station) Percent Increase Station 8Station 7Station 6Station 5Station 4Station 3Station 2Station 1AreaTotal Station201816141210864200.1517.80.111.37.38.116.99.4 company staffing at Station 1- Two Could be phased in one at a timefires, vehicle extricationsAbility to contain small fires, car Would respond to fire incidents low acuity EMS callsPrimary response to EMS calls/ located with fire engine/fire truck-person rescue vehicle co-Two at Stations 4 & 5person Squad - Response timeGreatest impact on reduction of apparatus maintenance, repair and replacement over (Best Overall) CLA contract changes, squad purchases (impact fees) -Scenario 4performance increase (Much Better)Readily achievable with the greatest overall ERF -Scenario 35 years on the horizon -Greatest expense, 4-Scenario 2Will be in place in July (Really Good)-Scenario 1 Modeling Final of firefighters All models do not increase staffing needs deployment models provide for options to accommodate new Upcoming fire station remodels will phased approach-better, best overallreally good, much -Leader’s intent Questions �I C� E IDIAN -- AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the Amount of$80,020 for consulting services for new Department of Justice ADA Web Content Accessibility Rule C�l fIEN MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Dave Miles Meeting Date: May 28, 2025 Presenter: Dave Miles Estimated Time: 5 mins Topic: Department of Justice New Rule on Accessibility Standards of Web Content Recommended Council Action: Approve budget amendment for $80,020 to fund consulting services to review and evaluate web content and mobile apps, and provide solutions to ensure that the City of Meridian web content and mobile applications meets the necessary ADA rule. Background: The Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a new rule regarding web content accessibility in April, 2024 that all local government web content and mobile applications shall meet updated ADA guidelines, specifically Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Version 2.11 Level AA. Per the DOJ rule, all cities with 50,000 or more persons shall comply with newly updated guidelines by April 24, 2026. Further details of the requirements are enumerated on the D0J Fact Sheet site. Based on the issuance of the rule, over the summer and fall of 2024 staff reviewed the new rule and discussed its impact and necessary actions that are required to ensure Meridian is in compliance with updated guideline standards. A project team consisting of Communications, Legal and IT evaluated the rule standards,the staff expertise, other agency actions and available resources and tools. Staff also implemented a widget tool which runs a base level analysis and fixes errors found via Al. This is paid for out of the current FY25 operating budget with expenses of$1,600 to date, with a predicted continued $150 per month ongoing cost. With results of the widget tool evaluated and the broader web content requirements identified, staff developed and issued an RFP to identify and engage experts who provide the identified services. Staff received and reviewed nine submissions with a range of scopes, qualifications and costs. Costs ranged from approximately$24,000 to $260,000, along with varying levels of experience, referrals and scopes of work. Through the RFP process, staff selected a consultant to perform the scope of work to include: • review and evaluation all publicly facing City web content, including internet browser, third-party programs and mobile device apps, • prepare and deliver a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation report of the city web content and recommendations for solutions, • staff training for ongoing compliance with laws and strategies to keep content compliant long-term. Page 1 of 2 Discussion: Staff feel that consulting services are the best approach to ensure that Meridian is in compliance with the DOJs new rule no later than April 24, 2026 to meet the rule making deadline for cities of 50,000 or more people. While some exemptions to specific technical standards exist within the rule making and may apply, there is no general, broad-based exception for Meridian to not have to meet this new rule. In addition, Meridian's goals to ensure transparency include access to transparent information and tools for everyone who utilizes Meridian services and sites. Meeting the required new standards and guidelines ensure that we are both compliant with Federal law and achieving our organization goals. In addition, Meridian does not have any current staff that are "the one" resident expert in ADA standards. Rather, Meridian has multiple staff who are knowledgeable of broad requirements and needs based on their subject matter. In discussions among those staff members, the identified preferred option is that council approve this project based, one-time funding need so that Meridian can have a thorough review and report of the organization's systems;implement recommended fixes to ensure the immediate rule making needs are met with the DOJs deadline; and also educate staff who interact with web content and tools on the guidelines and standards that will be required to be maintained over time. <end> Page 2 of 2 5/28/2025 12:37 PM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Personnel Costs Full Time Equivalent(FTE): Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total E 01 1840 41200 1 0 Wages 01 1840 41206 0 PT/Seasonal Wages 01 1840 41210 0 Overtime Please only complete the fields highlighted 01 1840 41304 0 Uniform Allowance in Orange. 01 1840 42021 0 FICA $ Amendment Details 01 1 1840 42022 0 PERSI I $ Title: ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates 01 1 1840 1 42023 0 Worker's Comp $ Department Name: Other Government 01 1 1840 1 42025 0 JEmployee Insurance 1 $ Presenting Department Name: Mayor's Office Total Personnel Costs $ Department#: 1840 Operating Expenditures Primary Funding Source: 1 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description One-Time On-Going Total CIP#: 01 1840 68000 1 0 ADA Compliance $ 80,020 $ 80,020 Project#: 01 1840 0 $ - 01 1840 0 $ Is this for an Emergency? ❑ Yes ❑� No 01 1840 0 $ New Level of Service? ❑ Yes ❑ No 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ Clerks Office Stamp 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 01 1840 0 $ 6-3-2025 01 1840 0 $ Date of Council Approval Total Operating Expenditures $ 80,020 $ $ 80,020 Capital Outlay Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Acknowledgement Date 01 1840 0 01 1840 0 Dave Miles via email 5.28.25 01 1840 0 Department Director 01 1840 0 REVIEWED 01 1840 0 [ByToddLavoieat 1:13pm,May28,2025 jfields 5.28.25 01 1840 0 Chief Financial Officer Total Capital Outlay $ Revenue/Donations Approved Luke Cavener via email 5.29.25 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Cou-i-6-11iaison �+-- 01 1840 0 01 1840 0 5-29-25 01 1840 1 0 1 Mayor Total Revenue/Donations $ Total Amendment Request $ 80,020 City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form F:\Budget\FY2025\FY2025 Amendments\1.Pending\FY2025 Budget Amendment Form_OG_ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates 5/28/2025 12:37 PM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Total Amendment Cost-Lifetime Prior Year(s) Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Department Name: Other Government Funding 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Title: ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates Personnel $ - $ $ $ $ Instructions for Submitting Budget Amendments: Operating $ 80,020 $ $ $ $ ➢ Department will send Amendment with Directors signature to Finance(Budget Manager)for review Capital $ - ➢ Finance will send Amendment to Council Liaison for signature Total $ - $ 80,020 $ $ $ $ ➢Council Liaison will send signed Amendment to Mayor Total Estimated Project Cost: $ 80,020 ➢ Mayor will send signed Amendment to Finance(Budget Manager) Evaluation Questions ➢ Finance(Budget Manager)will send approved copy of Amendment to Department Please answer all Evaluation Questions using the financial data referenced above. ➢ Department will add copy of Amendment to Council Agenda using Municode Agenda Manager 1. Describe what is being requested? Budget amendment for funding of consulting services to review,evaluate web content and mobile applications,and provide solutions to ensure that the City of Meridian web content and mobile applications comply with the Department of Justice new rule regarding Accessibility issued April,2024 that all local government web content and mobile applications shall meet updated guidelines,specifically Web Content Accessibility Guidelines(WCAG)Version 2.1,Level AA. All local governments with 50,000 or more persons have until April 24,2026 to comply with new rule. Rule Fact Sheet:https://www.ada.gov/resources/2024-03-08-web-rule/ 2. Why was this budget request not submitted during the current fiscal year budget cycle? r , The rule applies to web content that a state or local government provides or makes available.This includes when a state or local government has an arrangement with someone else who provides or makes available web content for them per DOJ 28 CFR Part 35[CRT Docket No.144;AG Order No.5919-2024] 3. What is thee lanation for not submittin this bud et request durinR the next fiscal vear bud et c cle? Time is of the essence. Staff have been in process of performing base analysis of current systems,implementing an initial widget,reviewing needed services and approach,and developing,issuing and evaluating RFP advertisement and submissions. 4.Describe the proposed method of funding? If funding is split between Funds(i.e. General,Enterprise,Grant),please include the percentage split. List the amounts and sources of anticipated additional revenue that will result from approval of this request. Fund Balance 5.Does this request align with the Department/City's strategic plan? If not,please explain how this request was not included in the Department/City strategic plan? r Yes. Government Excellence. Provide increased accessibility and transparency to government information... 6. Does this request require resources to be provided by other departments? If yes,please describe the necessary resources to be provided by other departments. Yes. Staff services via Legal, IT and Communications. 7.Does this Amendment include any needed Equipment or Software that will utilize the Cit 's network? Yes or No No 8.Is the amendment going to result in the disposal of an asset?(Yes or No) IL No 9.Any additional comments? N/A Total Amendment Request $ 80,020 Every effort should be made to avoid reopening the budget for an amendment. Departments will need to provide backup and appear before the City Council to justify budget amendments. Budget amendments are intended for emergency or mandatory changes to the original balanced budget. Changes to the original balanced budget may cause a funding shortfall. City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form F:\Budget\FY2025\FY2025 Amendments\1.Pending\FY2025 Budget Amendment Form_OG_ADA WCAG v2.1 Webpage Updates