Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo from Planning Project: Lochsa Falls Office/Commercial Addition RECEIVED FEB - 6 2007 Location: side of Chinden Boulevard, west ofN. Linder Road. City of Meridian City Cleric Office Applications: rezone and conditional use modification HigWights of Proposed Development: The applicant requests approval to rezone Lots 41-45, Block 49, Lochsa Falls Subdivision No. 12, from R-4 to C-N so that the zoning will reflect the future commercial uses. Four of the subject lots (Lots 42-45) were conceptually approved in 2002 for office uses and one was conceptually approved for commercial use (Lot 41) through a land use exception under the Planned Development for Lochsa Falls Subdivision. In addition to the rezone application, a modification to one of the conditions within the approved conditional use permit/planned development (CUP-02-012) is also being requested to be removed by the applicant. Currently CUP-02-0l2 requires detailed conditional use permit approval on these lots. The applicant is proposing to remove this requirement for CUP approval. Elevations: Yes Commission Recommendation: approval at their December 21, 2006 public hearing Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Brian McColl (Applicant's representative) ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Jay Anderton (Rep of Challenger Schools who owns Lots 41 & 42) Key Issues of Discussion by Commission: i. Cross-access to property to the east (Knight Hill Center Sub.) ii. Building setback from centerline of Chin den Boulevard (135 feet) Key Commission Changes to Staff Recommendation: Provide cross-access to the east Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: Building setback from centerline of Chinden Boulevard (135 feet) (see Exhibit B, condition 1.4) Other: If Council approves the applicant's requested rezone to C-N, Staff believes that a Development Agreement modification is necessary, and the applicant should be required to file a MI application prior the rezone ordinance being recorded. If Council approves Staff's recommendation to rezone Lots 42-45 to L-O and Lot 41 to C-N, Staff believes that a Development Agreement modification is not necessary. Notes: