Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD Right-of- Way & Development Services Department . ;i~i'~ ~-"'" ACHD "- JAN252007 ~ City Of Meridian. City Clerk Office Project/File: Lead Agency: Site address: Commission Hearing: Commission Approval: Applicant: Representative: Staff Contact: Tech Review: &'~ut';(O ~"' Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 This is a preliminary plat application for 115-single family lots and 6-common lots, City of Meridian 4435 S. Meridian Road January 24, 2007 January 24, 2007 M&H Development 291 E. Shore Drive, STE 200 Eagle, 10 83616 Engineering Solutions 150 E. Aikens Street, Sutie B Eagle, 1083616 Mindy Wallace Phone: 387-6178 E-mail: mwallace@achd.ada.id.us January 10, 2007 Application Information: Acreage: 38 Current Zoning: RUT Proposed Zoning: R-8 Residential Units: 115-single family lots Common Lots: 6 A. Findinqs of Fact Existing Conditions 1. Site Information: The site is currently used for agricultural purposes. 1 Sagewood - MPp-Oa-057/MAZ-06-058 2. Des . f crip1l0n 0 Ijacent urroundma Area: Direction Land Use Zonina North Medium Densitv Residential R6 South Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT East Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT West Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT fAd' S 3. Existing Roadway Improvements and Right-of-Way Adjacent To and Near the Site . Meridian Road (SH 69) is currently improved with 5 traffic lanes, and no curb gutter or sidewalk abutting the site, There is between 150 and 165-feet of right-of-way existing for Meridian Road (75 and 82-feet from centerline). . Harris Street is currently improved with 2 traffic lanes, and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 40-feet of right-of-way existing for Harris Street (20-feet from centerline). The north side of Harris Street is currently improved with curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalk. . The intersection of Meridian Road and Victory Road was signalized in 2006, 4. Existing Access: There is one defined access point to this property located off of Meridian Road, 5. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application. Development Impacts 6. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,100 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. 7, Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time, 8. Impacted Roadways: Roadway Frontage Functional Traffic Count I Level of Speed Classification Service* Limit Meridian Road 1,240' Principal 23,391 north of Better 55 MPH Arterial Amity on 8/16/05 than "C" Harris Street 1,500' Collector N/A Better 25 MPH than "C" *Acceptable level of service for a five-lane principal arterial roadway is "E" (37,000 VTD). 9, Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program: There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently in the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), or the Five Year Work Plan. B. Findinas for Consideration 1 . Traffic Impact Study Washington Group International prepared a traffic impact study for Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert Subdivisions. Below is a summary of the findings. 2 Sagewood - MPp-Oa-057/MAZ-Oa-058 o The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 4,096 vehicles of which the a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic is 321 and 432 vehicles, respectively. o As a result of the site build out, traffic on the area roadways is expected to increase in the vicinity. Traffic on Meridian Road is expected to increase 2,458 trips per day north of Victory Road, Traffic on Victory Road east of Meridian Road may increase by 614 trips per day and by 410 trips per day west of Meridian Road. Traffic on Amity Road may increase by 410 per day east of Meridian Road. Traffic may increase by 205 trips per day on Meridian Road south of Amity Road. o The intersection of Victory Road and Meridian Road is currently two-way stop controlled with the stop sign on the Victory Road approaches. However, the intersection is considered signalized for this study because a traffic signal is under construction at this intersection, With signalization, and the addition of an exclusive right-turn-Iane westbound, this intersection will operate at Level of Service (LOS) B during both peak hours for existing traffic volumes for the periods, For the 2011 Background Condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS C during both peak periods, For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS 0 during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p,m. peak hour. No improvements are necessary to accommodate background and build out traffic volumes. o The Harris Street (from the west) and Rumple Lane (from the east) intersections with Meridian Road is two-way stop controlled with the stop signs on the Harris Street and Rumpel Lane approaches, The minor street approaches currently operate at LOS 0 during the a.m hour and LOS F during the p,m. peak hour. For the background condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak hours, For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak hours, Improvements are needed to accommodate the existing, background, and build-out traffic volumes. Approximately, 10% of the peak hour traffic is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions, o The Amity Road and Meridian Road intersection is currently signal controlled. The intersection currently operates at LOS C during both the a.m. and p,m. peak hours. For the 2011 background condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak hours. For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak periods. Improvements are needed to accommodate the background and build-out traffic volumes, Approximately 1 % of the peak hour traffic volume is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions. o The intersection of Kentucky Way and Victory Road currently operates at LOS A during both peak hours. For the 2011 background condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS A during both the a,m, and p.m. peak hours. For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS A during both peak periods. An eastbound left- turn lane and a west bound right-turn radius are warranted on Victory Road at the site approach according to the ACHD left-turn deceleration and right-turn treatments nomographs. o The intersection of the site's central access with Harris Street is forecast to operate at LOS A during both the a.m. and p.m, peak hour for the build-out condition. A right-turn radius on the westbound Harris Street approach is warranted according to the right-turn treatments ACHD nomographs. Also, it is recommended that the outbound (minor) roadway provide 3 Sagewood - MPp-Oa-057/MAZ-06-058 sufficient width to allow simultaneous right and left turns, The total roadway width should be a minimum of 36 feet. o The site's east access with Harris Street is forecast to operate at LOS B during both the a,m, and p.m. peak hour for the build-out condition. A left-turn lane on the westbound Harris street approach is warranted according to the left-turn deceleration lane ACHD nomograph. Also, it is recommends that the outbound (minor) roadway provide a sufficient width to allow simultaneous right and left turns. The total roadway width should be minimum of 36 feet. o The forecast daily build out volumes (year 2011) for all roadways in the project vicinity are lower than COMPASS's planning thresholds. The area's roadways do not require any capacity improvements to accommodate site generated traffic volumes. o All subdivision street with front-on-housing have projected ADT volumes less than 1,000 vehicles per day. No problems with the internal street system have been identified in this study. An island will be installed to create a frontage road for the existing homes currently fronting on Harris Street. The following transportation-related improvements needed to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by the three proposed Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert developments: o Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Harris Street and Meridian Road to accomdate existing, background, and build out traffic volumes. The Harris Road and Rumpel Lane approaches should provide separate right and left-turn lanes. The Meridian Road approaches should provide right-turn lanes in addition to existing left-turn lanes, With improvements, the intersection is forecast to operate "below capacity" during both peak periods for the background and build-out conditions. Approximately 10% of the peak hour traffic is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions. A previous traffic impact study performed for the development on the east side of Meridian Road at Harris Street also required the installation of a signal at the Harris Street/Rumpel Lane/Meridian Road intersection. Meridian Road is currently classified as type IV access control which allows half-mile signal spacing. o Improve the intersection of Amity Road and Meridian Road in order to accommodate background traffic and build traffic condtions. In order to accommodate projected traffic volumes, dual left-turn lanes and exclusive right-turn lanes are needed on each approach, Two throught travel lanes are needed on the east bound and westbound approaches. Three through travel lanes northbound and southbound are also necessary, With improvements, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS C during both peak hours for the background conditions, For 2011 build-out condtion, the intersection if forecast to operate at LOS C and LOS 0 for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. Approximately, 1 % of the peak hour traffic volume is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions. o Provide a left-turn lane and right turn radius on Victory Road at Kentucky Way to accommodate site traffic, These improvements are warranted based on ACHD's left-turn deceleration-lane and right-turn treatment nomographs shown in the appendix, o Provide a right-turn lane on Harris Street to accommodate site traffic entering at the West Harris Street Access. This turn lane is warranted based on ACHD's left-turn deceleration- lane and right-turn treatment nomographs shown in the appendix. 4 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 o Provide a left-turn lane on Harris Street to accommodate site traffic entering at the East Harris Street access. This turn lane is warranted based on ACHD's left-turn deceleration- lane nomographs shown in the appendix. 2. Meridian Road Staff Comment/Recommendation: Meridian Road/Highway 69 is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD). The applicant, the City of Meridian, and ITD should work together to determine if additional right-of-way or improvements are necessary on Meridian Road/Highway 69, 3. Harris Street Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 72-F1 B requires collector roadways to be constructed as 46-foot street sections with vertical curb, gutter, and 5-foot detached (or 7-foot attached) concrete sidewalks within 70-feet of right-of-way. This street section allows for the construction of a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes. Sidewalk Policy: District policy requires 7-foot wide attached (or 5-foot detached) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204.7.2), Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct 8-foot landscape islands with 25- foot access pockets along the north side of Harris Street. These landscape islands would act a as a buffer for the front-on housing, which currently exists on Harris Street The applicant has proposed to construct Harris Street as a 36-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter, 5-foot detached concrete sidewalk and 8-foot planter strips within 52-feet of right-of-way, Staff Comment/Recommendation: Staff is supportive of the landscape islands with the 25-foot access pockets as they will buffer the existing homes that front-on Harris Street. The buffer will provide a clear distinction between parking and access for the existing homes and the collector roadway. Coordinate the design of the landscape islands with District Traffic Services Staff. The applicant's proposal to construct Harris Street as a standard residential collector with a 36-foot street section is approved as proposed. 4. Signal at Harris Street & Meridian Road (US 69) The submitted TIS states that a signal is warranted at the site access (Harris Street) intersection with Meridian Road (SH69). Harris Street is located at the half-mile, and this location meets the requirements of the City of Meridian's Unified Development Code for an access location, The applicant should be required to provide a road trust deposit with the District for one-sixth of the cost for the design and construction of the signal. When the property on the east side of Meridian Road develops, they can utilize the road trust deposit funds to construct the signal at that time OR at the time when ITD approves a signal in that location. Depending on the signal design, Harris Street may need to be wider at is intersection with Meridian Road. 5. Internal Streets Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7204.4.1 and Figure 72-F1A requires 50-feet of right-of-way on local streets. This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 2-lane roadway with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks. 36-foot Street Section Policy: District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any buildable lot that is less that 1-acre in size will typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32- feet with curb, gutter and sidewalks. The total street width shall be 36-feet from back-of-curb to 5 Sagewood - MPP-06a057/MAZ-06-058 back-of-curb. Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5-feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5-feet or more in which case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4-feet in width, Applicant Proposal (Internal streets): The applicant is proposing to construct the internal streets as 36 -foot street sections with rolled curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalks within 50- feet of right-of-way. Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposals meet District policy and should be approved with this application. 6. Roadway Offsets Roadway Offset Policy: District policy 7204,11,6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 300-feet from an arterial roadway (measured centerline to centerline), District policy 7204.11,6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from a collector roadway (measured centerline to centerline). District policy 7204,11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from another local roadway (measured centerline to centerline). Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct two roadways to intersect Harris Street. The first, S. McGuire Street, located approximately, 620-feet west of the east property line (measured property line to centerline) in alignment with S. McGuire Street on the north side of Harris Street. The second roadway, W. Shepody Drive, located approximately 480-feet east of the west property line (measured property line to centerline). Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposals meet District policy and should be approved with this application. 7. Stub Streets Stub Street Policy: District policy 7203.5.1 states that the street design in a proposed development shall cause no undue hardship to adjoining property. An adequate and convenient access to adjoining property for use in future development may be required, If a street ends at the development boundary, it shall meet the requirements of sub section 7205, "non-continuous streets." District policy 7205.5 states that stub streets will be required to provide intra-neighborhood circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7204,5,7204.6 and 7204.7, except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be required if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE" Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct one stub street to the south, and two stub streets to the west. The stub streets are proposed to be located as follows: . Stub street to the south, S. Carbondale Avenue, is proposed to be located approximately 530- feet west of the east property line (measured property line to centerline). . Stub street to the west, Harris Street, a residential collector, is proposed to be located at the northwest property line. . Stub street to the west, W. Summerford Drive, located approximately, 670-feet north of the south property line (measured property line to centerline), 6 Sagewood - MPP-06~057/MAZ-06-058 Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and should be approved with this application. When Harris Street is extended in the future it will need to be constructed as a standard residential collector. 8, Turnarounds Turnaround Policy: District policy 7205.2.1 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. The applicant should also be required to provide a minimum of a 29-foot street section on either side of any proposed center islands within the turnarounds. The medians should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 1 OO-square foot area. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct one cul-de-sac turnaround with a 50-foot turning radius. Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and should be approved with this application. The applicant will be required to construct the cul-de-sac turnaround with a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 9. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 6-feet in width. In addition to prohibiting trees in planters less than 6-feet in width, the policy requires a minimum planter width of 6-feet for class II tress with the installation of root barriers on both sides of the planter strip or a minimum planter width of 8-feet without the installation of a root barrier. The policy also requires Class I and Class III trees to provide a minimum planter width of 10-feet 10. Other Access Meridian Road is classified as a principal arterial roadway. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to this roadway and should be noted on the final plat. c. Site Specific Conditions of ARf)roval 1, Comply with requirements of ITD and City of Meridian for the Meridian Road/Highway 69 frontage. Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first Contact the District III Traffic Engineer at 334-8340. 2, Construct 8-foot landscape islands with 25-foot access pockets on the north side of Harris Street to buffer the existing homes. Coordinate the design of the landscape islands with District Traffic Service staff, 3, The applicant is required to provide irrigation facilities and irrigation water to the 8-foot landscape islands with 25-foot access pockets on the north side of Harris Street. Enter into a license agreement with the District for the landscaping located within the center landscape islands. 4. Construct Harris Street as a complete 36-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter, 5-foot detached concrete sidewalk and 8-foot planter strips within 52-feet of right-of-way, as proposed, 5, Provide a road trust deposit with the District for one-sixth of the cost for the design and construction of signal at the intersection of Harris Street and Meridian Road. 7 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 6. Construct the internal streets as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. 7. Construct two roadways to intersect Harris Street. . The first, S. McGuire Way, located approximately 480-feet east of the west property line (measured property line to centerline) in alignment with S. McGuire Street on the north side of Harris Street. . The second, W. Shepody Drive, located approximately 480-feet east of the west property line (measured property line to centerline). 8. Construct three stub streets in the following locations, as proposed and install a sign at the terminus of the stub street stating "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". . Stub street to the south, is proposed to be located approximately 530-feet west of the east property line (measured property line to centerline). . Stub street to the west, Harris Street, a residential collector, is proposed to be located at the northwest property line, . Stub street to the west, W. Summerford Drive, located approximately, 670-feet north of the south property line (measured property line to centerline), 9, Construct one cul-de-sac turnaround with a minimum 45-foot turn radius, as proposed. 10. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to Meridian Road shall be noted on the final plat. 11. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 8 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 D. Standard Conditions of Awroval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way, 2. Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or right-of-way. 3. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 4. Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 5. Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy. 6. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 8. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes, 9. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy, 10, Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance, 11. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLlNE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 12, No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 13. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought 9 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 E. Conclusions of Law 1, The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2, ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed useldevelopment will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1 , Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan 3. Request for Reconsideration Guidelines OR Appeal Guidelines 4. Develo ment Process Checklist 10 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 ....._Ilial..j 1I1U~~ iIII~IotClIK ~'~''''!IIII>> ~~'YIMIG"~_ tl<<l-tIrl_j'4J ...,..4CtIlDJ..... IlW1 IMQI 'nWJ \IIJt;'ll1'li:l_lWi'N ;m.~"'.. ,__lMtl~ ~=~ It bolliillOllll 'MI ._- i .c:l'o'JNOO/i;BNNIfld Ot!Q03H ~ ~~NMO ~ IJ: ." ", :1 ~, , I co ll...:.f I ,----.~~~t ~ n__-t._..,:; j t i~j:_ '"1:- f/-l_1: ~ lL \ I:; 1E I' - I ,'II:' f-~ig-~~~, -1~~~~lfll7 'VtIUIIltII ,_ ' ""~1I,,,3 .! 1"'" A.....~'3lld N:OISIAIQUIlS aOO~:ilf)VS !)...~~~ ......lli!......l.~ ~ Il t;~. J[~ II e"3IClIJ1 lih ' g~ I I! H it ~ 1"1" · d~U ~ .. Hi ~ H~=~ ~ i i~;~6i !hhR.~R ~6iill:t~1 !~III!;.; .!Inl.it l"h~ll! .I!;IM: II... .Iti~ i , ~'I." ';I\I~Ii!'!! ~:;I~!il mi~ii ~~ ii.i1pI ; I Ililidql~1 II 11111 H IH 'lll~.*, t; " , I , r ' ~~~ ~Ilnhi ~n~ihUhH ! I \. I I I II : : . i jI , , I'. . : : r ,~ 1 : l-- ;; lL . Slie~BJ\1~ .1"U ~- ! ~!,~B ;, ~~ 1 ~l.!:"~' ilJ Iii i I . ~~ I~ I. . I" j "i:!IA11~ Jih, ~ ~ii .1 d ~M~i -T"i".'~ -,-- i!~_i'~ i "-f. >- :1 I - $ ,; : , : l ill ~ r ' II 1 : t I' t ~ , ! il" " ; II _ lit) I ji'I' I., ,I I ii" ~i ~l""'- a-=--~ ~ r : l tflE . .. 'I}! ~ i ~!I 1 ~ .~rliI1! 1h:: --.....~- .- r. -I, il] f-;r " rlr+- ~..."..,.. I ~I.I i ~ I 'i--{ \ I i, Iii ~ I I I' l ii' ,~ ~ . "' II '!' I II I: ~ ~ I ( - \:;' - t ~ ~ I g n II Development Process Checklist II l8ISubmit a development application to a City or to the County l8IThe City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD l8IThe ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review l8IThe Planning Review Division will do one of the following: DSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time, DSend a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. DWrite a Staff level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. l8IWrite a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy, l8IThe Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission level reports. DFor All development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: . The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation,) . The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. DPay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID yaU REMEMBER: Construction (Zone) o Driveway or Property Approach(s) . Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. o Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way . Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction - Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) o Sediment & Erosion Submittal . At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction - Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Division, o Idaho Power Company . Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCa approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled, o Final Approval from Development Services ACHD Construction - Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling a Pre-Con, 12 Sagewood - MPP-06~057/MAZ-06-058 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action 1. Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken, Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting, c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 13 Sagewood - MPP..06-057/MAZ-06-058 ~~-. -""'f ~ -~""'7.~ ~ A~ fk~ut~ ~ John S. Franden, President Rebecca W. Arnold, 1st Vice President Sherry R. Huber, Commissioner Dave Bivens, Commissioner Carol A. Mckee, Commissioner To: H & M Development 291 E. Shore Drive, STE 200 Eagle, 1083616 MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 Sagewood Subdivision 2235 S. Meridian Road RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2007 January 25, 2007 City of Meridian City Clerk Offk" Subject: On January 24, 2007, the Ada County Highway District Commission acted on your application for the above referenced project. The attached report lists site-specific requirements, conditions of approval and street improvements, which are required. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (208) 387-6178. Sincerely, -1J/~?V,dlj(~ Mindy Wallace Planner II Right-of-way & Development Services Ada County Highway District cc: Project file, Utilities City of Meridian Engineering Solutions - Becky McKay Ada County Highway District · 3775 Adams Street · Garden City, ID · 83714 . PH 208-387-6100 . FX 345-7650 . www.achd.ada.id.us Right-of-Way & Development Services Department .;;i~i.',,- A~ Project/File: Lead Agency: Site address: Commission Hearing: Commission Approval: Applicant: Representative: Staff Contact: Tech Review: ~~ul';(O ~ Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06~058 This is a preliminary plat application for 115-single family lots and 6-common lots. City of Meridian 4435 S. Meridian Road January 24, 2007 January 24, 2007 M&H Development 291 E. Shore Drive, STE 200 Eagle, 1083616 Engineering Solutions 150 E. Aikens Street, Sutie B Eagle, 10 83616 Mindy Wallace Phone: 387-6178 E-mail: mwallace@achd.ada.id.us January 10, 2007 Application Information: Acreage: 38 Current Zoning: RUT Proposed Zoning: R-8 Residential Units: 115-single family lots Common Lots: 6 A. Findinas of Fact Existing Conditions 1, Site Information: The site is currently used for agricultural purposes. 1 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 ,- 2. Des 'f crip110n 0 lJacent urroun ng rea: Direction Land Use Zoning North Medium Density Residential R6 South Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT East Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT West Rural-Urban Transition Zone RUT fAd' S di A 3. Existing Roadway Improvements and Right-of-Way Adjacent To and Near the Site · Meridian Road (SH 69) is currently improved with 5 traffic lanes, and no curb gutter or sidewalk abutting the site, There is between 150 and 165-feet of right-of-way existing for Meridian Road (75 and 82-feet from centerline). · Harris Street is currently improved with 2 traffic lanes, and no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is 40-feet of right-of-way existing for Harris Street (20-feet from centerline). The north side of Harris Street is currently improved with curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalk. · The intersection of Meridian Road and Victory Road was signalized in 2006, 4. Existing Access: There is one defined access point to this property located off of Meridian Road, 5. Site History: ACHD has not previously reviewed this site for a development application, Development Impacts 6. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 1,100 additional vehicle trips per day based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. 7. Impact Fees: There will be an impact fee that is assessed and due prior to issuance of any building permits. The assessed impact fee will be based on the impact fee ordinance that is in effect at that time. 8. Impacted Roadways: Roadway Frontage Functional Traffic Count Level of Speed Classification Service* Limit Meridian Road 1,240' Principal 23,391 north of Better 55 MPH Arterial Amity on 8/16/05 than "C" Harris Street 1,500' Collector N/A Better 25 MPH than 'lC" *Acceptable level of service for a five-lane principal arterial roadway is "E" (37,000 VTD). 9, Capital Improvements Plan/Five Year Work Program: There are currently no roadways, bridges or intersections in the general vicinity of the project that are currently in the District's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), or the Five Year Work Plan. B_ FindinCls for Consideration 1. Traffic Impact Study Washington Group International prepared a traffic impact study for Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert Subdivisions, Below is a summary of the findings, 2 Sagewood - MPP-OS-057/MAZ-06-058 o The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 4,096 vehicles of which the a,m, and p.m, peak hour traffic is 321 and 432 vehicles, respectively. o As a result of the site build out, traffic on the area roadways is expected to increase in the vicinity. Traffic on Meridian Road is expected to increase 2,458 trips per day north of Victory Road. Traffic on Victory Road east of Meridian Road may increase by 614 trips per day and by 410 trips per day west of Meridian Road. Traffic on Amity Road may increase by 410 per day east of Meridian Road, Traffic may increase by 205 trips per day on Meridian Road south of Amity Road. o The intersection of Victory Road and Meridian Road is currently two-way stop controlled with the stop sign on the Victory Road approaches, However, the intersection is considered signalized for this study because a traffic signal is under construction at this intersection. With signalization, and the addition of an exclusive right-turn-Iane westbound, this intersection will operate at Level of Service (LOS) B during both peak hours for existing traffic volumes for the periods. For the 2011 Background Condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS C during both peak periods, For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS 0 during the a.m, peak hour and LOS C during the p,m. peak hour, No improvements are necessary to accommodate background and build out traffic volumes, o The Harris Street (from the west) and Rumple Lane (from the east) intersections with Meridian Road is two-way stop controlled with the stop signs on the Harris Street and Rumpel Lane approaches. The minor street approaches currently operate at LOS 0 during the a.m hour and LOS F during the p.m. peak hour, For the background condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak hours. For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak hours. Improvements are needed to accommodate the existing, background, and build-out traffic volumes, Approximately, 10% of the peak hour traffic is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions, o The Amity Road and Meridian Road intersection is currently signal controlled. The intersection currently operates at LOS C during both the a.m. and p,m. peak hours. For the 2011 background condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak hours, For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F during both peak periods. Improvements are needed to accommodate the background and build-out traffic volumes, Approximately 1 % of the peak hour traffic volume is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions, o The intersection of Kentucky Way and Victory Road currently operates at LOS A during both peak hours. For the 2011 background condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS A during both the a.m, and p.m. peak hours. For the 2011 build-out condition, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS A during both peak periods. An eastbound left- turn lane and a west bound right-turn radius are warranted on Victory Road at the site approach according to the ACHD left-turn deceleration and right-turn treatments nomographs. o The intersection of the site's central access with Harris Street is forecast to operate at LOS A during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hour for the build-out condition. A right-turn radius on the westbound Harris Street approach is warranted according to the right-turn treatments ACHD nomographs. Also, it is recommended that the outbound (minor) roadway provide 3 Sagewood - MPP~06-057/MAZ-06-058 sufficient width to allow simultaneous right and left turns. The total roadway width should be a minimum of 36 feet. o The site's east access with Harris Street is forecast to operate at LOS B during both the a,m. and p.m. peak hour for the build-out condition. A left-turn lane on the westbound Harris street approach is warranted according to the left-turn deceleration lane ACHD nomograph, Also, it is recommends that the outbound (minor) roadway provide a sufficient width to allow simultaneous right and left turns. The total roadway width should be minimum of 36 feet. o The forecast daily build out volumes (year 2011) for all roadways in the project vicinity are lower than COMPASS's planning thresholds. The area's roadways do not require any capacity improvements to accommodate site generated traffic volumes, o All subdivision street with front-on-housing have projected ADT volumes less than 1,000 vehicles per day, No problems with the internal street system have been identified in this study. An island will be installed to create a frontage road for the existing homes currently fronting on Harris Street. The following transportation-related improvements needed to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by the three proposed Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert developments: o Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Harris Street and Meridian Road to accomdate existing, background, and build out traffic volumes. The Harris Road and Rumpel Lane approaches should provide separate right and left-turn lanes. The Meridian Road approaches should provide right-turn lanes in addition to existing left-turn lanes. With improvements, the intersection is forecast to operate "below capacity" during both peak periods for the background and build-out conditions. Approximately 10% of the peak hour traffic is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions, A previous traffic impact study performed for the development on the east side of Meridian Road at Harris Street also required the installation of a signal at the Harris Street/Rumpel Lane/Meridian Road intersection. Meridian Road is currently classified as type IV access control which allows half-mile signal spacing, o Improve the intersection of Amity Road and Meridian Road in order to accommodate background traffic and build traffic condtions. In order to accommodate projected traffic volumes, dual left-turn lanes and exclusive right-turn lanes are needed on each approach. Two throught travel lanes are needed on the east bound and westbound approaches. Three through travel lanes northbound and southbound are also necessary, With improvements, the intersection is forecast to operate at LOS C during both peak hours for the background conditions. For 2011 build-out condtion, the intersection if forecast to operate at LOS C and LOS 0 for the a.m. and p,m. peak hours, respectively. Approximately, 1 % of the peak hour traffic volume is due to the Sagewood, Laidlaw, and Lambert subdivisions, o Provide a left-turn lane and right turn radius on Victory Road at Kentucky Way to accommodate site traffic. These improvements are warranted based on ACHD's left-turn deceleration-lane and right-turn treatment nomographs shown in the appendix. o Provide a right-turn lane on Harris Street to accommodate site traffic entering at the West Harris Street Access. This turn lane is warranted based on ACHD's left-turn deceleration- lane and right-turn treatment nomographs shown in the appendix, 4 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 o Provide a left-turn lane on Harris Street to accommodate site traffic entering at the East Harris Street access, This turn lane is warranted based on ACHD's left-turn deceleration- lane nomographs shown in the appendix. 2. Meridian Road Staff Comment/Recommendation: Meridian RoadlHighway 69 is under the jurisdiction of the Idaho Transportation Department (ITD), The applicant, the City of Meridian, and ITD should work together to determine if additional right-of-way or improvements are necessary on Meridian Road/Highway 69, 3. Harris Street Street Section and Right-of-Way Policy: District pOlicy 72-F1 B requires collector roadways to be constructed as 46-foot street sections with vertical curb, gutter, and 5-foot detached (or 7-foot attached) concrete sidewalks within 70-feet of right-of-way, This street section allows for the construction of a 3-lane roadway with bike lanes. Sidewalk Policy: District policy requires 7-foot wide attached (or 5-foot detached) concrete sidewalk on all collector roadways and arterial roadways (7204,7.2). Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct 8-foot landscape islands with 25- foot access pockets along the north side of Harris Street. These landscape islands would act a as a buffer for the front-on housing, which currently exists on Harris Street. The applicant has proposed to construct Harris Street as a 36-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter, 5-foot detached concrete sidewalk and 8-foot planter strips within 52-feet of right-of-way. Staff Comment/Recommendation: Staff is supportive of the landscape islands with the 25-foot access pockets as they will buffer the eXisting homes that front-on Harris Street The buffer will provide a clear distinction between parking and access for the existing homes and the collector roadway, Coordinate the design of the landscape islands with District Traffic Services Staff. The applicant's proposal to construct Harris Street as a standard residential collector with a 36-foot street section is approved as proposed, 4. Signal at Harris Street & Meridian Road (US 69) The submitted TIS states that a signal is warranted at the site access (Harris Street) intersection with Meridian Road (SH69). Harris Street is located at the half-mile, and this location meets the requirements of the City of Meridian's Unified Development Code for an access location. The applicant should be required to provide a road trust deposit with the District for one-sixth of the cost for the design and construction of the signal. When the property on the east side of Meridian Road develops, they can utilize the road trust deposit funds to construct the signal at that time OR at the time when ITD approves a signal in that location. Depending on the signal design, Harris Street may need to be wider at is intersection with Meridian Road. 5. Internal Streets Right-of-Way Policy: District policy 7204,4,1 and Figure 72-F1A requires 50-feet of right-of-way on local streets. This right-of-way allows for the construction of a 2-lane roadway with curb, gutter and 5-foot wide concrete sidewalks, 36-foot Street Section Policy: District policy 7204.4.2 states, "developments with any buildable lot that is less that 1-acre in size will typically provide streets having a minimum pavement width of 32- feet with curb, gutter and sidewalks, The total street width shall be 36-feet from back-of-curb to 5 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 back-of-curb. Concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5-feet in width unless they are separated from the curb 5-feet or more in which case the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 4-feet in width, Applicant Proposal (Internal streets): The applicant is proposing to construct the internal streets as 36 -foot street sections with rolled curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalks within 50- feet of right-of-way. Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposals meet District policy and should be approved with this application. 6. Roadway Offsets Roadway Offset Policy: District policy 7204,11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 300-feet from an arterial roadway (measured centerline to centerline), District policy 7204,11.6, re,quires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from a collector roadway (measured centerline to centerline), District policy 7204,11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 125-feet from another local roadway (measured centerline to centerline), Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct two roadways to intersect Harris Street. The first, S. McGuire Street, located approximately, 620-feet west of the east property line (measured property line to centerline) in alignment with S. McGuire Street on the north side of Harris Street. The second roadway, W, Shepody Drive, located approximately 480-feet east of the west property line (measured property line to centerline), Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposals meet District policy and should be approved with this application. 7. Stu b Streets Stub Street Policy: District policy 7203,5.1 states that the street design in a proposed development shall cause no undue hardship to adjoining property. An adequate and convenient access to adjoining property for use in future development may be required, If a street ends at the development boundary, it shall meet the requirements of sub section 7205, "non-continuous streets." District policy 7205,5 states that stub streets will be required to provide intra-neighborhood circulation or to provide access to adjoining properties. Stub streets will conform with the requirements described in Section 7204.5, 7204.6 and 7204.7, except a temporary cul-de-sac will not be required if the stub street has a length no greater than 150-feet. A sign shall be installed at the terminus of the stub street stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE." Applicant Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct one stub street to the south, and two stub streets to the west The stub streets are proposed to be located as follows: · Stub street to the south, S. Carbondale Avenue, is proposed to be located approximately 530- feet west of the east property line (measured property line to centerline). · Stub street to the west, Harris Street, a residential collector, is proposed to be located at the northwest property line. · Stub street to the west, W. Summerford Drive, located approximately, 670-feet north of the south property line (measured property line to centerline). 6 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposal meets District policy and should be approved with this application. When Harris Street is extended in the future it will need to be constructed as a standard residential collector. 8. Turnarounds Turnaround POlicy: District policy 7205.2.1 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. The applicant should also be required to provide a minimum of a 29-foot street section on either side of any proposed center islands within the turnarounds. The medians should be constructed a minimum of 4-feet wide to total a minimum of a 1 OO-square foot area. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant has proposed to construct one cul-de-sac turnaround with a 50-foot turning radius. Staff Comment/Recommendation: The applicant's proposal meets District pOlicy and should be approved with this application, The applicant will be required to construct the cul-de-sac turnaround with a minimum turning radius of 45-feet. 9. Tree Planters Tree Planter Policy: The District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy prohibits all trees in planters less than 6-feet in width, In addition to prohibiting trees in planters less than 6-feet in width, the policy requires a minimum planter width of 6-feet for class II tress with the installation of root barriers on both sides of the planter strip or a minimum planter width of 8-feet without the installation of a root barrier. The policy also requires Class I and Class III trees to provide a minimum planter width of 10-feet 10. Other Access Meridian Road is classified as a principal arterial roadway, Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to this roadway and should be noted on the final plat C. Site Specific Conditions of AllJ)roval 1, Comply with requirements of ITD and City of Meridian for the Meridian Road/Highway 69 frontage, Submit to the District a letter from ITD regarding said requirements prior to District approval of the final plat or issuance of a building permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first Contact the District III Traffic Engineer at 334-8340. 2, Construct 8-foot landscape islands with 25-foot access pockets on the north side of Harris Street to buffer the existing homes, Coordinate the design of the landscape islands with District Traffic Service staff. 3, The applicant is required to provide irrigation facilities and irrigation water to the 8-foot landscape islands with 25-foot access pockets on the north side of Harris Street. Enter into a license agreement with the District for the landscaping located within the center landscape islands, 4. Construct Harris Street as a complete 36-foot street section with vertical curb, gutter, 5-foot detached concrete sidewalk and 8~foot planter strips within 52-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. 5. Provide a road trust deposit with the District for one-sixth of the cost for the design and construction of signal at the intersection of Harris Street and Meridian Road, 7 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ~06-058 6. Construct the internal streets as a 36-foot street section with curb, gutter, and 5-foot attached concrete sidewalk within 50-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. 7. Construct two roadways to intersect Harris Street. · The first, S. McGuire Way, located approximately 480-feet east of the west property line (measured property line to centerline) in alignment with S. McGuire Street on the north side of Harris Street. · The second, W. Shepody Drive, located approximately 480-feet east of the west property line (measured property line to centerline). 8. Construct three stub streets in the following locations, as proposed and install a sign at the terminus of the stub street stating ''THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". · Stub street to the south, is proposed to be located approximately 530-feet west of the east property line (measured property line to centerline). · Stub street to the west, Harris Street, a residential collector, is proposed to be located at the northwest property line, · Stub street to the west, W. Summerford Drive, located approximately, 670-feet north of the south property line (measured property line to centerline). 9, Construct one cul-de-sac turnaround with a minimum 45-foot turn radius, as proposed. 10. Other than the access specifically approved with this application, direct lot access is prohibited to Meridian Road shall be noted on the final plat. 11. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. 8 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 D_ Standard Conditions of AIDlroval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way, 2, Private sewer or water systems are prohibited from being located within any ACHD roadway or right-of-way. 3, All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer, 4, Replace any existing damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details, 5, Comply with the District's Tree Planter Width Interim Policy. 6, Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact the District's Utility Coordinator at 387-6258 (with file numbers) for details. 7, All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans, 8. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 9, Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy, 10. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #200, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance, 11. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way, The applicant at no cost to ACHD shall repair existing utilities damaged by the applicant The applicant shall be required to call DIGLlNE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction, 12. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 13, Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. 9 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058 E. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development Attachments Vicinity Map Site Plan Request for Reconsideration Guidelines OR Appeal Guidelines Develo ment Process Checklist i - . i 10 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06~058 ."r-'" ...._,&~. .'.......... . '1~-'"1{~~ .'CII='.~~Jf- ClW'~~Y".'h::~ i ~! ~ :;.~~ ~~.;.~ l'1lj."1 ~lIIltJ '~J ..~-K.I~\..' .~.. "...,...."....... . -. ~"".' n. w....... ....._ : ''*11 .~, ~ ...... ';1 tl:;Il:lJ'i 1-' .", ~ "I: ~ ~JIQ;l" ~ i~i~ ~",. ~~. ,~~ ......... 1lIr~~'~f ~_: ..... ~,,"7,:.;=' 1l~1!;'~iHJ....~~1 " 71.~W::::: .~ ~:~!9Q ~r= '.~ ;!Qni ~I 'r~'I'J II '11'1:> ~jj.t ~ "", "'INOUD10S, l.V1d Ab/'tINIWn31::k/ -. a:~ &fJl/i~"'W:I/I"'~~ :j'1'M""'.~~lo.1iI ~'nP" j.}jjJIJ N0I8IAIaHOS -, I 8NI1I3,,/lII,,1 ~ i~:~ i 0- ., Q~OO~ 00 ~=>IJ.\O ~3d01"'3<l i l:r1lNO~ I ~3NNVld aOOA\39VS :":",~)~ .. :;11 ~ I ~i; ~ i! ~~I ~ : ij 1"ln dt; ,. ~~ il=~ ~ H:~~ . , ~tlk' ~ ~i.i;d ~Hs. .~f'W "~g~~. h i j , ~ ~.~;; ! .~ ~:w. 2:~! \i.!ii mu~(h ii".~~n~' ,~;\;~<~; "E i dr.i. ~ ... ~ .* ~ '1''' .' ~ ~~"'I!!i - . j ~ ~ a'~\ 'i '..*ii hd ~. > ~~.g. ~~'h:lH ,..L I ... , ~ h ,.tl~ , ~h~ ;;~rq . , , . , . , . , . , .' , ,. . ~ . -. ! ~ ~ ~ HI q i~ i hip d p II ' q; goo-.I; ~~ddBn ~ me, I I~:;~~' ~~I.I ~~ f~ ,,- .. --- , ~ il':ll!l-~ .-.- --"', ::-.~I' ]:'-- . -1 -:-:~?' .--i IL --.....:".j.;:'--I.:~~ .. Ji ~ i: !ItH.~, ~; i i: ~ ~ i dh~hB i~. L~~~i - jh~nh~JH t -.:.::;---7-'2.. I O? ~,'r : ~ ": '~::}-~~.;-c-_ :,"!",: ..~~~~~~___~::o> :-~ ..' ,.t:..vt~~'~-~:=~':-~~~~:;'-~-f~~~~=~~r~'=l -~ ---- '--I"" ~I -->. ,;,,";"il<i"'i'''l~"f'''; <j~8~~oi~~1'~'i::Ii";,~, '~'-~:j' ,,"~.:: " . ,..-....;"J \. . .- .. :,' . .,. ,,~. '--_ ,.."'1 .r,--.<~-, ~- ',: " -1- r~ 9\' ., - '" . " . .. .- '! ~ 1-',--'~'7:: . J~-'-- .-. - .... -4-" \:iff~"'- . ! ' I i:.-f .. ... I \ ;~l:i I __~ill. , , ~~ ~.I,I ):.: I::; a: I I ~ m~i!:I"iJi ;:,.~~ i[ ~ m~IJB I' ~~' ~ 'jO.."!: I ! i l ; ! I I ',: '-"' '! I!i i ~ : ~ ~ 1)1~:~ll.i ,J"II, .1.~ i"':~ j!g~i~11 ~1l!1,llh iidiA!, -,-':f'''''',-- !r-;'l "f"::'r1 l~;~ ~ 1 t~ ~ ; :: 1 "' ", j 8 ~ i i.t Ii ,. c.. i:i .. I:i.._--_'_~ :,:_ ~..~ ~o '., ~ \ >.~.~ ~ :: . :.:j ._~~_.... ~~f~l ~ ]~. ~ i ~ Ill. ~ ~,~ ~ liJ \( i ~,; ~i \ n~I<.1-~~.= I., , 7----j-, '-----L' I ~ 5 I I ~ ' !, .iq ~ ,1 i ;! :0 ^U H i i . -'~j ~ " ,1.. p:__ ~, .j J11~ ~ \ I i g 0 , l' ~ ~ ~ I' Ii ! i ~ .' i 1< i i i ~!; , ,,'".t. ::~. - . , , ii ; ;t ~ ~-~,.~ "- ~ 3i II Development Process Checklist II [gISubmit a development application to a City or to the County [gIThe City or the County will transmit the development application to ACHD [gIThe ACHD Planning Review Division will receive the development application to review I8IThe Planning Review Division will do one of the following: DSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time, DSend a "Comply With" letter to the applicant stating that if the development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. DWrite a Staff Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy. [gIWrite a Commission Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its conformance to District Policy, [gIThe Planning Review Division will hold a Technical Review meeting for all Staff and Commission Level reports. DFor ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: · The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by the Development Review Division for plan review and assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) · The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) for ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches. street improvements and utility cuts, DPay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impact fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Zone) o Driveway or Property Approach(s) · Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" form to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services & Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. o Working in the ACHD Right-of-Way · Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Use Permit Application" to ACHD Construction - Permits along with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (Subdivisions) o Sediment & Erosion Submittal · At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD Construction - Subdivision to be reviewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Division. o Idaho Power Company · Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. o Final Approval from Development Services ACHD Construction - Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to scheduling a Pre-Con, 12 Sagewood - MPP.06-057/MAZ-06-058 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action 1, Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties, a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. If a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time, b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken, Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting, c, The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error of fact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting, d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally, It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be returned, The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e, At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable, f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission, 13 Sagewood - MPP-06-057/MAZ-06-058