Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ - Applicant Presentation Incore values originally set by Harry and Esther many years ago. Out, and she holds to the firm foundation and -N-and President of InSnyder, is the owner LynsiHarry and Esther’s very own granddaughter, •operated, we do not franchise.Out Burger location is 100% privately owned and -N-Every single Inowned business. -Out is still a family-N-location in Baldwin Park, InMore than 70 years after Harry and Esther opened the very first •Out has not only grown as a company, but we have built a family. -N-InBaldwin Park, a small quiet suburb in Southern California. Since then, Out Burger was founded in 1948 by Harry and Esther Snyder in -N-In•not just a company, but a member of the community. So, Who Are We?Out’s history is important to who we are today and to what makes us -N- INSTRONGER, SAFER AND BETTER PLACES TO LIVE.ASSISTING ALL COMMUNITIES IN OUR MARKETPLACE TO BECOME 3.ASSOCIATES.EXCELLENT TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL OF OUR SETTING AND COMMUNICATIONS EXIST, AND TO PROVIDE ORIENTED ATMOSPHERE WHEREBY GOAL -PROVIDING A TEAM2.WHEREBY THE CUSTOMER IS OUR MOST IMPORTANT ASSET.FOR A PROFIT, AND A SPOTLESS, SPARKLING ENVIRONMENT PROVIDING THE FRESHEST, HIGHEST QUALITY FOODS AND SERVICES 1.OUT BURGER EXISTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF:-N- COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF A NEW INTHE WHOSOEVERS (SUBSTANCE ABUSE HELP)ST. LUKES HEATH FOUNDATIONFAMILY ADVOCATE PROGRAMBOISE RESCUE MISSIONTRAFFICKING COALITION-IDAHO ANTIIDAHO YOUTH RANCHTO ORGANIZATIONS IN THE STATE OF IDAHO SINCE ENTERING THE STATEGIVEN OVER $160,000 OUT BURGER HAS ALREADY -N-INOUT.-N-LIFELONG CAREER WITH INCOMMUNITY YOUTH WILL LEARN THE VALUE OF AND BE REWARDED FOR THEIR HARD WORK AND SOME MAY CHOOSE TO PURSUE A OPPORTUNITIES TO ENTER STORE MANAGEMENT AND MOVE TO CORPORATE SUPPORT POSITIONS. LEVEL RESTAURANT JOBS, ALONG WITH ADDED -INCLUDE NOT ONLY ENTRY LEVEL RESTAURANT JOBS, BUT WILL ALSO MORE SKILLEDWE PAY THE HIGHEST HOURLY WAGES OF ANY EMPLOYER IN THE QUICK SERVE RESTAURANT CATEGORY. NEW JOBS CREATED WILL BEST EMPLOYER OF ANY TYPE TO WORK FOR.RD COUNTRY TO WORK FOR AND THE 3OUT IS A HIGHLY REGARDED EMPLOYER, RECENTLY RANKED BY GLASS DOOR AS THE BEST RESTAURANT IN THE -N-IN–NEW JOBS OUT RESTAURANT INCLUDE:-N- WITH THIS SITE. HE FACT THAT WE DO NOT ABUT RESIDENTIAL ZONING THE PROPERTY ABUTS A RESIDENTIAL USE OR DISTRICT.” STAFF NOTED TLL BE LIMITED FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 11:00 P.M. WHEN G DISTRICTS SHA-C AND C-BUSINESS HOURS OF OPERATION WITHIN THE CRETAIL, OFFICE, SERVICE, AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES.” S “LARGEST SCALE AND BROADEST MIX OF G ZONE A-G. THE CITY CODE DEFINES THE C-THE PROPERTY IS ZONED CTHE SITE WHEN TEMPORARY PEAKS OCCURTHE SITE PROVIDES SPACE TO EXTEND THE DRIVE THROUGH QUEUE WITHINCODE WITH 73 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED PROJECT PROVIDES NEARLY FIVE TIMES THE PARKING REQUIRED BY CITY OUT LOCATIONS-N-LOT SIZE OF ALL IDAHO INPROPOSED SITE IS OVER 2 ACRES IN SIZE WHICH IS NEARLY DOUBLE THE OUT WOULD OPEN-N-HIGHWAY 16 EXTENSION IS EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETED BY THE TIME IN, AND THE SAME DISTANCE ON LINDER RD. COULD SEE A 15% DECREASE.REDUCTION% TEN MILE RD. BETWEEN USTICK RD. AND CHINDEN BLVD. COULD SEE A 30MCMILLIAN RD. AND FRANKLIN RD. ON BLACK CAT RD. BETWEEN 20% DECREASE IN TRAFFIC -THE HIGHWAY EXPANSION COULD CREATE A 10G (REPORTED BY BOISE DEV):EXPECTED TRAFFIC REDUCTION ON TEN MILE ROAD STATING THE FOLLOWINON TO STAKEHOLDERS DISCUSSED THE AN IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT HIGHWAY 16 EXTENSION PRESENTATI 1) THAT THE SITE IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USTHE CITY ON SITES AS LARGE AS 2.2 ACRESFEW IF ANY COMPARABLE DRIVE THRU FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS OPERATE IN-SPACES WOULD REMAIN IN USEPLAN TAKING 15 SPACES, 58 OVERSTACKING. WITH THE SITE PARKING IS 73 WHICH IS MORE THAN 4 TIMES THE REQUIRED PARK-PLAN PROVIDED SHOWS THE WELL OVER 52 CARS CAN BE QUEUED ON SITEOVERSTACKLANE PROPOSED. THE AVERAGE WAS 30 CARS WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DRIVE THROUGH DAYAND THE WEEK AXIMUM OBSERVED QUEUE AT THE VILLAGE WAS 46 CARS THE STACKING LANES ARE SUFFICIENT BASED ON OBSERVED DATA. THE M-UFFICIENT FOR THIS PROJECTTHIS SITE IS VERY LARGE FOR DRIVE THROUGH USE AND IS S--ACRES .2 ACRES AND BOISE IS ABOUT 1 ACRE AND NAMPA IS 1.4 THIS SITE IS 2.2 ACRES WHERE THE VILLAGE AT MERIDIAN STORE IS 1-OUT RESPONSE:-N-INBY PATRONS, PER THE ANALYSIS ABOVE IN SECTION III. WAY-OF-ISLES AND THE PUBLIC RIGHTACKING LANES TO HAVE 11, WHICH REQUIRE ST-3-4-SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS LISTED IN UDC 11OSED USE AND COMPLY WITH THE CITY STAFF FINDING: LOCATED. AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS IN THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE USE IS E AND MEET ALL THE DIMENSIONAL 2) THAT THE PROPOSED USE WILL BE HARMONIOUS WITH THE MERIDIAN COCONGESTIONXCESSIVE NOISE, TRAFFIC AND RAPIDS AND PATRONS OF OTHER COMMERCIAL USES IN THE AREA DUE TO EIVE NEARBY TRAVELING ON LOST ABUTTING EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AREA RESIDENTS THAT LLL NEGATIVELY IMPACT PLAN IN THAT THE PROPOSED USE AND EXTENDED HOURS OF OPERATION WIIOUS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE : STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED INFILL DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT BE HARMONCITY FINDINGACCORD WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE. MPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IN INL BE NO CHANGE EXISTING IN LEVELS OF SERVICE CONGESTION AND THE PROVIDED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS CONCLUDED THERE WILAND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS TO REFUTE THE CLAIMS OF OUT HAS GATHERED OBJECTIVE OBSERVED DATA IN QUEUE ANALYSIS-N-IN-THE STAFF FINDING IS UNSUPPORTEDENERATES EXCESSIVE NOISE OR TRAFFIC CONGESTION. THE STAFF MAKES THIS FINDING WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE THE PROJECT G-ENFORCING CITY CODEORS OF COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS BY THE POLICY STAFF CITED STATES: TO MINIMIZE NOISE LIGHTING AND ODENSIVE PLAN HOWEVER WE DO COMPLYCITY STAFF SUGGEST THE PROJECT WILL NOT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREH-STAFF REPORT ACKNOWLEDGES THATTHE–G ZONE HERE -THE OPERATING HOURS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE C-S THIS FINDING CANNOT BE MADETHERE IS NO EVIDENCE PRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT THAT SUGGEST-:OUT RESPONSE-N- 3) THAT THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE WILLR DOUBLE STANDARDTHE CITY FINDING IS INCONSISTENT WITH CITY CODE AND IS AN UNFAI-COMMERCIAL USES ALONG ARTERIAL STREETS.G CENTER THE SURROUNDING DRIVE THRU AND G ZONE, EXISTING SHOPPIN-THIS PROJECT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE C-GER KING AND OTHERS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. THERE ARE SEVERAL SIMILAR DIVE THRU USES SUCH AS CAFÉ RIO, BUR-NTER APPROVAL INCLUDED DRIVE THRU USES ON THE SITEG AND WAS THE OVERALL SHOPPING CE–THE PROJECT SITE IS ZONED C -. THE FOLLOWING FACTS DO:THE STAFF REPORT PROVIDES NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT ITS CONCLUSION-OUT RESPONSE-N-INESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE AREA. ILL ADVERSELY CHANGE THE WITH THE PROPOSED USE AS DISCUSSED ABOVE IN SECTION III, WHICH WEA AND WILL BE EXACERBATED TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS, WHICH ARE ALREADY CHALLENGING IN THIS ARTO NOISE, AIR QUALITY AND RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES IN THE GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD, DUET BE COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER STAFF FINDS THE DESIGN AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOCITY STAFF FINDING: TER OF THE SAME AREA. AND THAT SUCH USE WILL NOT ADVERSELY CHANGE THE ESSENTIAL CHARACARACTER OF THE GENERAL VICINITY IN THE GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD AND WITH THE EXISTING OR INTENDED CHBE COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER USES 4) THAT THE PROPOSED USE, IF IT COMPLIES WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF POINTVIEW PRIOR TO THE STAFF REPORT MAKING THIS A MOOT FEEDBACK OR NOTE SIGNIFICANT DESIGN ISSUES DURING THE PROJECT REONIGHT AND ODDLY DID NOT SUGGEST ANY DESIGN STAFF ELECTED NOT TO PREPARE ANY CONDITIONS FOR CONSIDERATION T-OUT RESPONSE:-N-INPROPOSED USE. DAMENTAL CHANGES TO THE APPROVAL TO ADEQUATELY MITIGATE THESE ADVERSE EFFECTS ABSENT FUNRACTICABLE TO DEVELOP CONDITIONS OF AFFECT OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY. STAFF FINDS IT IS NOT PROPOSED USE WILL ADVERSELY STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE PROPOSED USE AS STAFF FINDS THE PSTAFF FINDING: ADVERSELY AFFECT OTHER PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY. THE APPROVAL IMPOSED, WILL NOT 7) THAT THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT INVOLVE ACTIVITIES OR PROCESSETHE CITY AND THOSE PRESENTLY WITHIN THE SHOPPING CENTER.WOULD DENY VIRTUALLY ALL OTHER DRIVE THRU USES IN THE STAFF CLAIM OF IDLING CARS IS NOT SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE AND-OF SERVICEWITH THIS FINDING CONCLUDING NO CHANGE IN LEVELS THE TRAFFIC STUDY AGAIN DEMONSTRATES THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT -OUT RESPONSE:-N-INTESTIMONY RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC INCLUDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDVE IN SECTION III AND LETTERS OF OF TIME, NOISE, TRAFFIC AND CONGESTION BASED ON THE ANALYSIS ABOG IN LINE FOR EXTENDED PERIODS DUE TO EXCESSIVE PRODUCTION OF EXHAUST FUMES FROM VEHICLES IDLINPERTY AND THE GENERAL WELFARE STAFF FINDS THE PROPOSED USE WILL BE DETRIMENTAL TO PERSONS, PROSTAFF FINDING: KE, FUMES, GLARE OR ODORSWELFARE BY REASON OF EXCESSIVE PRODUCTION OF TRAFFIC, NOISE, SMOPROPERTY OR THE GENERAL CONDITIONS OF OPERATION THAT WILL BE DETRIMENTAL TO ANY PERSONS,S, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND 1)CENTER THAT ARE ALSO WITHIN 300 FEET OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTSG CODE AND WITH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DRIVE THRU USES IN THE SHOPPINOUT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY DRIVE THROUGH -N-THE PROPOSED IN7)THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SHOPPING CENTER USES6)AT THIS LOCATION AT THE TIME THIS STORE IS OPENLE HIGHWAY 16 EXTENSION WILL CONSIDERABLY RELIEVE TRAFFIC ON TEN MI5)ADJACENT ROADWAYSD EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE IN THE INTERSECTION AT LOST RAPIDS ANOUT WILL NOT RESULT IN A CHANGE TO TRAFFIC -N-THE PROPOSED IN4)OPERATION GIVEN IT DOES NOT ABUT RESIDENTIAL USESG ZONE HOURS OF–OUT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE C -N-THE PROPOSED IN3)ALLOWED USESG ZONE AND ITS –OUT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE C -N-THE PROPOSED IN2)SHOPPING CENTER PLAN AND APPROVALOUT STORE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL -N-THE PROPOSED IN