Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-03-31 Celeste Fox Charlene Way From:CELESTE FOX <wifeoffox@msn.com> Sent:Monday, March 31, 2025 11:47 AM To:Clerks Comment Subject:Latitude 43 subdivision hearing #H-2024-0059 External Sender - Please use caution with links or attachments. To whom it may concern, I am a Woodbridge resident, 582 S Woodhaven Ave, and will directly back up to the proposed Latitude 43 subdivision. I have several concerns. 1) At the Woodbridge neighborhood meeting, the builder stated that the back of their proposed houses would be more than 20 feet from our back property line. The same information was repeated in a subsequent conversation with Life Style Homes. Woodbridge had the misfortune of being given inaccurate and misleading information from the previous builder in 2021 where we were given information in writing as well as copies of a plat design drawing that specified no less than a 27' for two story along the west property line. This was also submitted to the P&Z commission as part of a development agreement. Right after Woodbridge supported the project at the P&Z Commission hearing, the builder told us he was not required to adhere to that setback and was planning on a 12' setback. Woodbridge has fought for years to prevent a development that would compromise our quality of life. Therefore, I am requesting that the builders of Latitude 43 provide details of their planned setback next to the Woodhaven neighbors in writing that will be part of the development agreement and that they will also adhere to. 2) My backyard slopes downward towards my house. The Latitude 43 parcel backing up to my yard is a couple of feet higher than mine. This issue affects several of the houses along the properly line. Since Woodhaven slopes toward the South, we have had continuous drainage issues, particularly from higher neighbors who overwater their property. Many Woodbridge homeowners have had to deal with water in their crawl spaces. I would like clarification about what the Latitude 43 builders can do to prevent a drainage issue which could significantly affect some of Woodhaven houses including mine. 3) The perimeter fence dividing Woodbridge from Latitude 43 was originally of built of very poor construction. The fence was crooked to avoid the tall rose trees and many along Woodhaven lost several feet of their property since property lines were not considered. Many of the fences fell over when windy. Some of us paid to rebuild our rear fence, jutting backward to the property line pins to reclaim our property. This leaves a very uneven perimeter fence, with many sections of very poor construction. Thank you for your consideration Celeste Fox 1