Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD CZC 06-208 (}()~ut1O ~u- ::~~.~'..:~.~'~,",~~:;:C"":''''~~'''':''/!-''':::'~,~hv..~':.~.~~~~''''''1t''''?'!:""'.~.' John S. Franden, President Rebecca W. Arnold, 1st Vice President Sherry R. Huber, 2nd Vice President Dave Bivens, Commissioner Carol A. McKee, Commissioner TO: Dave Evans Construction 7761 W Riverside Dr, Ste 100 Boise, 1083714 January 10, 2007 SUBJECT: MClC-06-208 Creative Homes Office 2963 E Copper Point Dr Meridian, 10 83642 In February 2001, the Ada County Highway District Commissioners acted on MCUP-01-037/MPP-01- 020/MPP-05-010 for EI Dorado Business Campus. The conditions and requirements also apply to MClC-06-208. . Prior to final approval you will need to submit plans to the ACHD Development Review Department. . A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6177. Sincerely, ~ : Chelsee Kucera Planner I Right-of-Way and Development Services :.~..'":..: CC: Project File City of Meridian Ada County Highway .. 3775 Adams Street.. Garden City, lD .. 83714 .. PH 208-387-6100 .. FX 345-7650 .. www.achd.ada.id.us ~. i1' ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT Planning and Development Division Development Application Report Preliminary Plat - Eldorado Business Campus MCUPOI-037/ MAZOI-018 s/w/c Overland Road/Eaile Road 15-lots Tht application has been referred to ACHD by the City of Meridian for review and comment. The Eldorado Business Campus is a 32-lot office/commercial subdivision on 85.36-acres. The applicant is requesting rezone approval from R-l to C-C/C-G, annexation approval, as well as preliminary plat approval for the 85.36 acre subdivision. The site is located at the southwest comer of Overland Road and E~le Road. This development is estimated to generate 8,262 additional vehicle trips per day based on the submitted traffic impact study. ( Roads impacted by this development: Overland Road E~le Road Interstate 84 ACHD Commission Date 'lll"January 16,2002 -12:00 noon. Facts.and Findin&8: A. General Information ~ Owner - Winston Moore Applicant - W.H. Moore Company R-l - Existing zoniD! (low-density residential) C-C/C-G - Proposed zonin~ (general commercial) 85.36 - Acres 32 - Proposed buildi~ lots 17 -Pro{:M)sed common lots 4,950 - Total lineal feet of proposed public streets 285 - Traffic Analysis Zone (T AZ) West Ada - Impact Fee Service Area Meridian - Impact Fee Assessment District Eldor..cmm pasc 1 ~ !l ~, .. .- cr;~~"~lJII, I ~, ,rx' '" '\ rrll\~ iTi' - J~~ v 'T I .L- ~' ~.~ ~ , I>> ,,~ ... ~I ~~ ~;.r cj'~L~ \ \ ~~ '..J ~ ~~ I ~II--I' ---; II---- : ( I ~- !~ / ~ --~ .~~ "- I I ~ II I----:L"Y'_.~ ~~ ITs 10m 1--- I-- -~ -~ ~ n L"'-' III // ~I r---; r T ~~~ ~ ::::-uJ/ ~ II rTT - L I I ,...., i:il::i -~ 7_ - - -~I~E1L -.-1-- , ~-- .r---... Silverstone ;, 13' i ,. - ~ ----1 I Silve rstone II g =c f-..,; rrrrr:' 1,,>< :_ ~ ~~ I~I ~ ~ ~ -' '\: ~ r . .-. - -- 1000 0 1000 . \ lTL-J - $I ,,~ -1)- - I - = '1 ~ ..'-- ...- '-f. N + 2000 Feet . Eldor_.cmm Pap 2 , ~ ~ ". Overland Road Minor arterial with bike lane designation Traffic count of 13,551 on 11-30-99 (e/o Eagle Road) Traffic count of 11,422 on 11-30-99 (w/o Eagle Road) D -Existing Level of Service Greater than E - Existing plus project build-out Level of Service 1,300-feet of frontage 50-feet existing right-of-way (25-feet from centerline) 54 to 48-feet required right-of-way from centerline Overland Road is improved with 2-lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abuttin,g the site. There is a southlJound turn lane on Overland Rolkl at the Eagle Road intersection. The Overland/Eagle Road intersection currently operates at a level of service F. E~le Road Minor arterial with bike lane desi~nation Traffic count of 19,790 on 11-30-99 (n!o Overland Road) Traffic count of7,498 on 2-2-00 (s/o Overland Road) Traffic count of 44,397 on 10-19-99 (n!o 1-84) C - Existing Level of Service D - Existi~ plus project build-out Level of Service 2,700-feet offrontaae 50-feet existing riaht-of-way (25-feet from centerline) 52 to 48-feet required right-of-way from centerline Abuttin~ the site Eagle Road is improved with two travel lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk. North of Overland Road Eagle Road widens to 5-lan~. North of 1-84 EliIle Road is under the jurisdiction ofITD. Inter~ate 84 Traffic count on 1-84 was not available O-feet of frontage Interstate 84 is three lanes eastbound and three lanes westbound. Therca.is an "ON" and "OFF" ramp at Eaile Road. B. The OverlandlElIile Road .nd Mtridwn/Overland RQad intusectio.. operate.t a Lenl of Servicl! F (LOS F), Bod art liSted lis ont' of the 100 most critical inWliSectionl'in A~ County. Access control within the operllting IIrea of the intersection h vital to the safe optration!'ofthe inttr!lection. The !ubject !lite'; additional tramc will exacerbate the traffic problems at th:tse inttrfictions: Eldorado.cmm P.3 .1 ~ !j C. The Overland Road / Eagle Road intersection is in the Five Year Work prQgram. With the reconstruction of this intersection, the level of service for Eagle Road, Overland Road and the intersection are anticipated to improv.. D. On March 14,2001, the Commission approved the oriiinal Silverstone Corporate Center located directly across from the proposed Eldorado Business Campus. The Silverstone Corporate Center was estimated to 8llnerate approximately 9,629 vehicle trips per day. The Eldorado Business Campus is estimated to generate approximately 8,262 vehicle trips per day. On November 7, 2001, the Commission considered and allowed the Silverstone Corporate Center to have a fourth access point on Eagle Road due to the fact that the Silverstone Corporate Center had an extraordinary circumstance iefore them. Staff supported a fourth access on Eagle Road btcause ofthree key major components: 1. The Silverstone Corporate Center did not anticipate ownership of the newly acquired parcel, 2. They placed the access point (a public street) in a safer location than if they had not been approved with this request and 3. The applicant did not request direct access to E&&le Road when a formal application was filed for the newly acquired parcel (Silverstorlt II) with the City of Meridian or the District. On January 9, 2002, the Commission formally acted on Silverstone II, tilt newly acquired parcel. Silverstone II did not request a new access {mint to Eagle Road. Rather, they subdivided the 7.83 acre site into 31-lot commercial subdivision and took access from the fourth access point that was approved on Novem her 7, 2001. E. The formal application that was submitted to the City of Meridian and the District showed three access points on Eagle Road. Since the District received the formal submittal, the applicant has requested a fourth access point located on Eagle Road approximately 1, I 50-feet south of Overland Road. On January 16,2002, the Commission formally acted on the Eldorado Business Campus and !ranted th. fourth access point to E~le Road. This access point was proposed to be a driveway located on Eagle Road approximately 1,150-feet south of Overland Road. The following report reflects the Commissions formal action. F. The applicant hired Earth Tech Traffic Engineerinl to perform a traffic analysis of this si.. The analysis has identified the following conclusions, and this information has been verified by District staff: · The proposed development is projected to generate an average daily traffic (ADT) of 8262 vehicles per day (vpd), of which the PM peak hour traffic (PHT) is 1085 vehicles per hour (vph). · At build-out, the project will add 5,420 vehicles per day to Eagle RoQd north of the site, of these trips 727 will take the w-.stbound 1-84 ramp, 2,148 will travel eastbound on 1-84, and the remaining 2,545 will continue to the north. An additional 942 vehicles per day will travel south of the site on Eagle Road. The project will also add 1,182 vehicles per day to Overland Road east o:tJhe site and 727 vehicles per day on Overland Road west ofthe site. i'i Eldorallo.cnwn Page 4 ~ ti · The intersection ofEajle Road and Overland Road is currently operating at Level Of Service (LOS) F. It will operate at a LOS F under background conditions with or without the site traffic. This Development should be rlquired to participate in improvements to this- intedection to bring it up to an acaptable level ofservice. · The intersection ofEaale Road and the Eastbound and Westbound off ramps ofI-84 will function at an acceptable LOS with the addition of the site traffic. This assumes that the proposed signal in the Eastbound off-ramp is constructed by lTD. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Franklin Road will operate at LOS F with or without the project. Improvements to this intersection will require additional right-of-way and coordination with the other projects. Since the majority of the traffic will be comina from other growth in the area, widening ofthis intersection should be considered by ACHD and lTD. · The intersection of Overland Road and Meridian Road will operate at LOS F with or without the project. Additional lanes are required to make this intersection operate at an acceptable LOS D. This intersection is within the limits of a proposed project by ACHD. The site traffic should be included in the planning of the ACHD improvement project. · The intersection of Overland Road and Cloverdale Road will operate at LOS E under bac~round traffic. This site traffic will reduce the operation to LOS F. Additional lanes are required to malie this intersection operate at an acceptable LOS E. This area will probably see development in the coming years. · The intersection of Eagle Road and Victory Road will operate at LOS D under background traffic. The intersection operation will reduce to LOS F with the addition of site traffic. Adding a southbound left turn lane to this intersection would increase the operation to an acceptable LOS C. · Eagle Road south of the project will operate at an acceptable level ofservic! after build out of the project. The site should contribute right-or-way for future roadway expansion. Since Eagle Road is on a section line, it is assumed that th. future roadway will be a five-lane road. · Ea~le Road north of the site will operate at an accelt~able level of service after build out of the project. · Overland Road west of E3!le Road will operate at an acceptable l.vel of service for a three-lane road. A three-lane road is proposed to be built by ACHD on this section of roadway. · Overland Road east of Eagle Road will operate at a poor level of service after build out ofthe project. The Silverstone Corporate Center Traffic Impact Study su~gests that right-of-way should be dedicated for a five-lane future roadway. · The project should be required to construct a signal at the south main entrance to the site on Eaile Road. · The on-site roadways will operate above LOS C. · The signalized entrance to EI Dorado, along Ellgle Road, will operate at a LOS C. · The north unsWtalized entrance, along Eagle Road, will operate at a LOS E. · The south-unsignalized entrance, along ElI&le Road, will operate at a LOS C. · The west unsi8nalized ~trance along Overland Road will operate at a LOS C. · The middle unsignalized entranc.-, alOllg Overland Road, will operate at a LOS C. · The east unsignalized entrance, aloIPj Overland Road, will operate at a LOS B. · The signalized entrance to EI Dorado alone Ea&le Road will operate at a LOS C. ~; Eldorado.clI1If1 PlIie5 ~ i . Pending projectl Mssumed to be built by build-out and included in the analysiS'. · Locust Grove Overpass, and associated projects (RDI57, RD157B, F201-0I, F201-01B). These projects are all either unfunded or pending and are not scheduled to be8in acquirin~ R1W until at least 2004 for the overpass. · Overland Rd, ElJgle Rd/Cloverdale Rd (RD072) - Reconstruct and widen to 5-lane urban section. (unfunded) · Overland Rd, Locust Grove Rd/Eagle Rd (RD266) - 4/5-lane rural section. (2005) Project not includtd in tbl:tl1ltllic an.l~il that will....ct the impact area. · Project RD201-02, on Cloverdale Road between Overland Road and the 1-84 overpass. This project includes widening the overpass to three lanes and will also include intersection work at Cloverdale and Overland that will widen all four approaches to a 5-lane rural section. This intersection. This project is scheduled to lJe!in in Oct. 2002 and be completed by Summer 2003. G. The applicant should be required to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Ea~le Road located 2-feet within the new dght-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation ofthe sidewalk with District staff. Ifthe sidewalk meanders outside ofthe rilJht-of-way, provide an easement for the sidewalk H. The applicant should tJe required to construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Overland Road located 2-feet within the new ri&ht-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation ofthe sidewalk with District staff. If the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide an easement for the sidewalk I. District policy 7204.7.3 states that access points on arterials are based on the following: .:. One access point for less than I50-feet offrontltge .:. Two access points for 150-600- feet of frontage .:. Three access points for greater than 600-feet offrontlWe. Access points ar. considered to be both public streets and driveways. Due to the fact that this parcel has approximately 1,300 feet of frontage, they are allowed a maximum ofthree access points to Overland Road. The applicant is proposini three access points on Overland Road. The access points are proposed to be located in the following locations: . The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway on Overland Road approximately 240-feet west of Eagle Road . The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway on Overland Road approximately 550-feet west ofEagl~ Road . The applicant is proposing to construct a ,ublic road on Overland RoMrl approximately 950-feet west of Eagle Road Eldora~.cmm Page 6 ~ ~ ~ District policy requires driveways on arterial roadways to align or offset a 150-feet from any existing or proposed street. These Spaciqg requirements are illustrated in Fiiure 72-F5. Ifthe driveway is proposed to be located at or near a signalized intersection, the driveway should align or offset a minimum of 440-feet for a full access driveway or 220-feet for a ri!ht- in/right-out driveway. These spacing requirements are illustrated in F~ure 72-F3. The driveway that is proposed to be located on Overland Road approximately 240-feet west of Eagle Road meets District policy as a right-in/right-out driveway only. Because it meets District policy, it should be approved with this application. The driveway that is proposed to be located on Overland Road approximately 550-feet west of Eagle Road meets District policy as a full-access driveway. Because it meets District policy, it should b8 approved with this application. District policy 7204.11.6 restricts access to collector and arterial roadways. Due to the fact that access is restricted on collector and arterial roadways the applicant should construct the new public streets entering onto the arterial public roadway system to align or offset a minimum number of feet from any existing or proposed street. These spacing requirements are listed on in policy number 7204.11.6 and states, "the optimum spacing for collector intersections along arterials is 1,700-feet to allow adequate signal spacing. The minimum spacing for collector intersections alo~ arterials is 1,300-feet." The public roadway access point that is propvsed to I1t located on Overland Road approximately 950-feet west ofE~le Road is a collector roadway. This specific location does not meet District policy. Earth Tech, the applicants Traffic Engineer, states, and ''the internal roadways will adequately handle projected traffic volumes at a LOS C orlRater according to the Ada County Roadway Capacity Guidelines. These roads should be constructed to an ACHD standard for a collector road in a business district." Due to the fact that the District approved a similar design on the east side of Ea@le Road and the applicants Traffic Engineer filels that a collector roadway is warranted with this development, District staff believes that a modification of policy 7204.11.6 is, both, warranted and justifiable. I.. District policy 7204.7.3 states that access points on arterials are based on the followinl: .:. One access point for less than 150-feet of frontage .:. Two access points for 150-600-feet of frontage .:. Three access points for;ireater than 6()()-f~t offrontaee. Access points are conside~d to be both public streets and driveways. Due to the fact that this parcel has approximately 1,300 feet of frontage, they ~ allowed a muimum of three access points to Overland Road. The applicant is proposing four .,;:cess points on Eagle Road. The access points are proposed to be located in the following locations: Eldorado.cmm P~7 I: . ~ l~ '" ~..,.. ~ ~ . The applicant is proposing to construct a public roadway on Eagle Road approximately 700-feet south of Overland Road . The applicant is proposing to construct a driveway located on Eagle Road approximately 1,150-feet south of Overland Road. . The applicant is proposi~ to construct a public roadway on Eagle Road approximately 1,700-feet south of Overland Road . The applicant is proposing to construct a public roadway on Eagle Road approximately 2,400-feet south of Overland Road District policy 7204.11.6 restricts access to collector and arterial roadways. Due to the fact that access is restricted on collector and arterial roadways the applicant should construct the n.w public streets enterillg onto the arterial public roadway syst!m to align or offset a minimum number of feet from any existiqg or proposed street. These spacing requirements are listed on in policy number 7204.11.6. The public roadway access point that is proposed to be located on Eagle Road approximately 700-feet south of Overland ROM is a collector roadway. This specific location does not meet District pplicy. Earth Tech, the applicants Traffic Engine., states, ''the internal roadways will adequately aandle projected traffic volumes at a LOS C or greater according to the Ada County Roadway Capacity Guidelines. These roads should be constructed to an ACHD standard for a coUtctor road in a business district." Due to the fact that the District approved a similar design on the east side of Eagle Road and the applicants Traffic Engineer feels that a collector roadway is warranted with this development, District staff believes that a modification of policy 7204.11.6 is, both, warranted and justifiable. The driveway that is proposed to be located on E.e Road approximately 1,150-feet south of Overland Road was approved as a modification of policy by the District Commission on January 16,2002. The public roadway that is proposed to be located on Ea81e Road approximately 1,700-feet south of Overland Road meets District policy. Because it meets District policy, it should be approved with this application. The public roadway access point that is proposed to be located on Eagle Road approximately 2,400-feet south of Overland Road is a collector roadway. This specific location meets District policy and should lft'approved with this application. K. The applicant is proposing to construct a spine road thro~ the site with connections at Overland Road and Eqgle Road. This roadway (Copper Point Way) is proposed to align with the roadway that was approved with the Silverstone Corporate Center. Due to the volumes of traffic this development is expected to generate, the recommendation ofthe applicants Traffic Engineer, and the applicant's proposed site plan, the applicant should construct this roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs, gu~rs and sidewalks. The street should be constructed within 70-feet Eldorado.cmm Pag. 8 ~(n( [;'!! '" :; I~J~ '.: of ri~ht-of-way. Parking should be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant should submit a signage plan prior to final plat approval. L. The proposed roadway on Ea81e Road laeated approximately 1,700-feet south of Overland Rom is proposed to aliln with the roadway that was approved with the Silverstone Corporate Center. Due to the volumes of traffic this development is expected to generate, the recommendation of the applicants Traffic Engineer, and the applicants proposed site plan, the applicant should construct this roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. The street should be constructed within 70-feet ofriiht-of-way. Parking should be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant should submit a signage plan prior to final plat approval. M. The proposed roadway on Eagle Road located approximately 700-feet south of Overland Road is proposed to offset a driveway that was approved with the Silverstone Corporate Center. Due to the volumes oftraffic this development is exptcted to generate, the recommendation of the applicants Traffic Engineer, and the applicants prop"sed site plan, the applicant should construct this roadway as a 46-foot street section with curbs, ~utters and sidewalks. The street should t. constructed within 70-feet of right-of-way. Parkin~ should t. restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant should submit a s~na8e plan prior to final plat approval. N. The Silverstone Corporate Center has a comparable impact on the public roadway system. The Silverstone Corporate Center was required to construct center turn lanes on Eagle Road and Overland ROllil. To promote consistency and mit~ate traffic in the area, the applicant should be required to construct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for full access driveways. O. The applicant's site plan indicates a traffic signal on Eagle Road located approximately 1I3-mile south of Overland Road. According to the submitted traffic study that was submitted by the Eldorado Business Campus' and the Silverstone Corporate Center's traffic impact studies, at full build-out, the projects should be required to construct the signal, and the necessary site improvements associated with the signal. The Eldorado Business Campus' traffic impact study specifically addresses the proposed sisnalized intersection and states that the Eldorado Business Campus should construct a left turn bay at the main entrance on Eagle Road. Based on ACHD Commission action, traffic signals cannot be installed at these intersections until there is a warrant. The applicant's traffic engineer should work with ACHD Traffic Services staff to determine when the warrant is met, or is close to being. met. The developer should be financially responsible for the cost of one-half of the signal due to the fact that the Silverstone Corporate Center was required to contribute the half ofthe signal. This applicant should enter into a three way written agreement with tift: District for the cost and specific location of the traffic signal. P. The applicant is proposing to construct several landscape islands throuihout the site. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedicated by this plat should Eldorado.clYi11 PlIje 9 ;!<Il R. S. T. U. :~: v. ~~ be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes of this should be required on the fi nal plat. Q. The applicant is proposing to construct a stub street to the west property line. District staff recommends that a stub street be constructed to the west property line to provide connectivity throlfFout the area. District policy requires temporary tumarounds at the end of stub streets that serve more than one lot, or areireater than 150-feet in length. The applicant should be required to provide a paved temporary turnaround at the west end ofthe stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant should be required to install a sijIl at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the sign plan for the stub street, and the desi~n ofthllltumaround (if necessary) with District staff. The turnarounds should be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 55-feet. Any existin~irrigation facilities should be relocated outside of the right-of-way. Utility street cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writin,g by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbtrs) for details. Ifutility relQi:ation is necessary to construct improvoments required with this development, then all utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting; the site should IIie . borne by the developer. ACHD's Park & Ride Division Staffhave indicated the need for a park and ride location at the applicant's site. The District requests that applicant grant the District an easement for a 10 to 12- space Park & Ride area at this site. Commuteride staffwill contact the applicant to coordinate the location of the Park & Ride area. W. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that Tenants occupying the proposed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Pat Nelson at 387-6160. X. In order to reduce trips to and from this development, it is recommended that the tenants occupying the proposed building(s) be required to participate in any Transportation Manaiement Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. A Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) is formed with a coordinator that works as a liaison between businesses and private and public transportation providers to increase the use of alternative transportation and other trip reduction measures (shuttle buses, bus pass prQgrams, vanll"ols, carpools, bicycle and walking; Eldorado.cmm Page 10 ~ r~ enhancements). An annual survey will be required ofthe TMAlTMO to monitor participation in alternative transportation programs and forwarded to the ACHD Commuteride Office. Y. Based on developm!nt patterns in th~ artt'I'and thl resulting traffic glneration, staff anticipatd that the transportation !y~tem will not be adequate to ICcommodate additional traffic generated by thiS prop"-'ed dlvelopmlDt at accepted IfvelS of service without modificationsJo Eflglt Road.and Overland Road, and the intersection. (0 S~cial Recommendation to City of Meridian: I. In order to reduce trips to and from this development it is recommended that tenants occupying the propesed building be required to provide an Alternative Transportation Program for employees and provide an annual report to ACHD on employee participation. Commuteride staff will coordinate the Alternative Transportation Program with the applicant. For more information contact Ms. Pat Nelson at 387-6160. 2. In order to reduce trips to and from this devl!l.opment, the tenants occupyinj the proposed building(s) should be required to participate in any Transportation Management Association (TMA) or Transportation Management Organization (TMO) that is formed with a boundary that includes this site or is adjacent to this development. 3. The OverlandlEaale Road and Meridian/Overland Road intersections operate at a Lev.1 of Service F (LOS F), and are listed as one ofthe 100 most critical intersections in Ada County. Access control within the operating SMa ofthe intersection is vital to the safe operations of the intersection. The subject silll's additional traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems at thes. intersections. 4. Based on developm&t patterns in this area and the resultin8 traffic generation, staff anticipates that the transportation system will not lie adequate to accommodate additional traffic.generated by this proposed development at accepted levels of service without modifications to Ell@le Road and Overland Road, and the int~rsection. i;il The followinj Site Specific Requiremenf$ and StAndard Requirement!'1mu~ lJe met or provided for prior to ACHD approval of the final plat: Site Specific Requirements: I. Dedicate 54 to 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Overland Road abuttina the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance ofa building p<<mit (or other required permits), whichtv. occurs first. Allow up to 30 business day~to process the right-of-way dedication after r.:eipt of all requested material. The owner will be paid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD ri!ht-of-way. The applicant shall coordinate the dedication ofri~ht-of-way on Overland Road with District staff. Eldorado.cmm P.II (t ~. ~J t. 2. Dedicate 52 to 48-feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Eagle Road abutting the parcel by means of recordation of a final subdivision plat or execution of a warranty deed prior to issuance of a buildiIlli permit (or other required permits), whichever occurs first. Allow up to 30 business days to process the rwht-of-way dedication after receipt of all requested material. The owner will beopaid the fair market value of the right-of-way dedicated which is an addition to existing ACHD r_ht-of-way. The applicant shall coordinate the dedication of right-of-way on Eagle Road with District staff. 3. Construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Eagle Road located 2-feet within the new ri@ht-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation of the sidewalk with District staff. If the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide an easement for the sidewalk 4. Construct a 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk on Overland Road located 2-feet within the new riiht-of-way. Coordinate the location and elevation ofthe sidewalk with District staff. If the sidewalk meanders outside of the right-of-way, provide an easement for the sidewalk 5. Construct the proposed driveway on Overland Road approximately 240-feet west of Eagll Road. This driveway meets District policy as a right-inlrieht-out driveway only and is approved with this application. The applicant shall coordinate with the Districts Traffic Services Division to determine a mean to restrict this driveway to a riaht-inlright-out driveway only (ie raised median, internal island, etc.). " 6. Construct the proposed driveway on Overland Road approximately 550-feet west of Eagle Road as a full-access driveway. This driveway meets District policy and is approved with this application. 7. Construct the proposed public roadwav access point located on Overland Road approximately 950-feet west of Eagle Road is a collector roadway. This location is granted a modification of policy and is approved with this application. 8. Construct the proposed public roadway on Eaile Road approximately 790-feet south of Overland Road as a full-access roadway. This roadway meets District policy and is approved with this application. 9. Construct the proposed driveway on Eagle Road located approximately 1, I 50-feet south of Overland Road. This driveway was,~ranted as a modification of policy by the District's Commission on January 16,2002. 10. Construct the proposed public roadway on Ea8le Road approximately 1,700-feClt south of Overland Road. This roadway meets District policy and is approved with this application. II. Construct the proposed public roadway on Eagle Road approximately 2,400-feet south of Overland Road as a full access roadway. This roadway meets District policy and is approved with this application. Eldoradli.cmm PlI#I2 ii II ',~ {~ lii;;~ 12. Construct the proposed spine road with connections at Overland Road and Ea~le Road, as proposed. This roadway shall be constructed as a 46-foot street section with curbs, ~utters and sidewalks within 70-feet ofrj,iht-of-way, as proposed. Parkirw shall be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant shall submit a siWlage plan prior to final plat approval. 13. Construct the proposed roadway on Eagle Road located approximately 1,700-feet south of Overland Road to align with the roadway that was approved with the Silverstone Corporate Center. This roadway shall be constructed as a 46-foot street section with curbs, ~utters and sidewalks within 70-feet of right-of-way. Parkin! shall be restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant shall submit a signage plan prior to final plat approval. 14. Construct the proposed roadway on Eagle Road located approximately 700-feet south of Overland Road is proposed to offset a driveway that was approved with tM Silverstone Corporate Center. This roadway shall W: constructed as a 46-foot street section with curbs, gutters and sidewalks within 70-feet of rijht-of-way. Parking shall b. restricted on the proposed street, and the applicant shall submit a signaae plan prior to final plat approval. 15. Construct center turn lanes on Overland Road and Eagle Road for the proposed public street intersections and for all of the full access driveways. 16. Construct a left turn bay at the main entrance on Eagle Road. 17. Enter into a three way written a~reement with the District for the cost and specific location of the traffic signal on Eagle Road. 18. Any proposed landscape islands/medians within the public right-of-way dedica.d by this plat shall be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. Notes ofthis shall be required on the final plat. 19. Construct a stub street to the west property line. The applicant has proposed that the stub street be located approximately 450 feet north of the south property line. Staff is supportive of this location or any location that is located south of the proposed Lot 11. The applicant shall construct the stub street and provide a paved temporary turnaround at the west end of the stub street with a temporary easement provided to the District. The applicant shall be required to install a si@n at the terminus of the roadway stating that, "THIS ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED IN THE FUTURE". Coordinate the san plan for the stub street, and the desiin of the turnaround (if necessary) with District staff. 20. The turnarounds shall be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 55-feet. 21. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside of the right-of-way. Eldorado.cmm Page \3 " I. ~ oJ] 22. Utility str~t cuts in pavement less than five years old are not allowed unless approved in writing by the District. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file numbers) for details. 23. Ifutility relocation is necessary to construct improvements required with this development, then all utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer 24. Other than the access points specifically approved with this application, direct lot or parcel access to Eagle Road and Overland Road is prohibited. Lot access restrictions, as required with this application, shall be stated on the final plat. Standard Rlquirements: 1. A request for modification, variance or waiver of any requirement or policy outlined herein shall be made in writifl! to the ACHD Planning and Development Supervisor. The request shall specificallv identify each requilWment to he reconsidered and include a written explanation of why such a requirement would result in a substantial hardship or inequity. The wrifien request shall be submitted to the District no later than 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for ACHD Commillliion ~tion. Those items shall be rescheduled for discussion with the Commission on the next available meeting ajenda. Requests submitted to the District after 9:00 a.m. on the day scheduled for Commission action do not provide sufficient time for District staff to remove the item from the consent agenda and report to the Commission regardini, the requested modification, variance or waiver. Those items will be acted on by the Commission unless removed from the ll&enda by the Commission. 2. After ACHD Commission action, any request for reconsideration ofthe Commission's action shall be made in writin! to the Planning and Development Supervisor within six days ofthe action and shall include a minimum fee of $11 0.00. The request for reconsideration shall specifically identify each requirement to be reconsidered and include written documentation of data that was not available to the Commission at the time of its orMinal decision. The request for reconsideration will be heard by the District Commission at the next r08Ular meeting of the Commission. Ifthe Commission agrees to reconsider the action, the applicant will ~ notified of the date and time of the Commission meeting at which the reconsideration will be heard. 3. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to buildinJ construction in accordance with Ordinance #193, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer rejistered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. Elttbrado.cmm PlI!lC 14 .) '" ~ :'U 1'(.) 1i, The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of buildini permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. III Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. .~ It is the responsibility of the applicant to verifY all existin8 utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damajed by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call mGLINE (1-800-342-1585) at least two f\111 business days prior to brealiing ground within ACHD right-of-way. The applicant shall cgntact ACHD Traffic Operations 387-619V in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised durini any ptl.ase of construction. Ii. No change in the terms and conditions ofthis approval shall be valid unless they are in writini and sijned by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative ofthe Ada County Highway District. The bur<tln shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 9. Any change by the applicant in the planned use ofthe property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, re~ulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and le~l restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the H~hway District of its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. Conclusion of LIW: I. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on theltxisting vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the pro~sed de\410pment. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact the Plannin! and Development Division at 387-6170. Submitted by: Commission Action: Planni~ and Develo,?ment Staff Eldorado.cl\1I1 P.15 ~l~ '"