Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-01-28 Regular
City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics ACTION ITEMS 1. Final Plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision (FP-2024-0020) by David Evans and Associates, Inc., located near the South side of W. Amity Rd., midway between S. Meridian Rd. and S. Linder Rd. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 2. Public Hearing continued from January 14, 2025 for 3970 E. Overland Rd. (H- 2024-0053) by Dominic Pera, JGT Architecture, located at 3970 E. Overland Rd. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0053 A. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1.120 acres of land from the R-1 zone in Ada County to the General Retail and Service Commercial District (C-G) zoning district for the construction of a 4,950 sq. ft. multi-tenant building with one side being used for a restaurant. Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Whitlock. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener Voting Nay: Councilman Overton 3. Public Hearing for Fairview Drive-through (H-2024-0049) by Ethan Mansfield, Hawkins Company, located at 4300 E. Fairview Ave. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0049 A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through facility for a coffee shop that is within three hundred (300) feet of another drive-through facility and an existing residence. B. Request: Modified Development Agreement to create a new Development Agreement to establish the hours of operations to begin service of the coffee shop at 5:00am and approve new concept plans. Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 4. Public Hearing for Werre (SHP-2024-0004) by Benjamin Semple, Rodney Evans and Partners, LLC., located at 2945 W. Ustick Rd. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/SHP-2024-0004 A. Request: Short Plat to subdivide an existing parcel consisting of 3.123 acres of land into two (2) building lots in the R-4 zoning district. Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Taylor. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 5. Election of City Council Officers and Liaison Assignments By vote of City Council, Luke Cavener was elected as Council President and Liz Strader was elected as Council Vice-President ORDINANCES \[Action Item\] 6. Ordinance No. 25-2071: An ordinance (Black Cat East – H-2024-0047) annexing a parcel of land located in the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit “A”; rezoning 3.62 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 7. Ordinance No. 25-2072: An ordinance (Pivot Pointe Subdivision – H-2024-0029) annexing a parcel of land located in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit “A”; rezoning 7.64 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the R-8 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 7:58 PM Meridian City Council January 28, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:02 p.m. Tuesday, January 28 , 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Bill Parsons, Sonya Allen, Linda Ritter, Jeff Brown, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is January 28th, 2025. It's 6:02 p.m. We will begin tonight's regular City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next item is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you would all, please, rise and join us in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: Tonight's community invocation will be delivered by Pastor Troy Drake. If you would, please, join us in the community invitation or I take this as a moment of silence and reflection. And, Pastor, thank you for being here, because it would have been really awkward if I would have called up the first applicant if you weren't here to -- to lead us, so — Drake- Okay. My pleasure, Mr. Mayor and Council Members. Would you join me in a word of prayer. Well, Lord God, we just thank you that you can be here this evening, that you have given us life and we have the freedom here in our country and in this city, the state we appreciate those things so much. God, before I forget I just want to lift up the Plimmer family. I know that there has been a death in the family and -- and they came before the Council just recently to have something approved and so we just pray that you would comfort the family. You are the great comforter and so you know what they need and I just pray that they would seek you and that you would come alongside them and, God, of course we are also just praying for our community here this evening. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 2 of 39 Our -- the first responders. We appreciate them keeping us safe and -- and -- and -- and helping in those areas of trouble. So, we pray for them, that they would just have the -- you know, the ability to protect the citizens and, God, we also lift up those who are homeless and that they can find shelter, that -- that someone would open their heart and home to them, so that they wouldn't be on the street. They can be fed. Lord, it's freezing out, we just pray -- and our heart breaks for those who are fearful in that kind of a place and, of course, God, we are here for the Council meeting and so I just pray for everything that goes on in this building. God, you just reminded me in Romans where it says that, you know, the governing authorities are -- are appointed by you and they are for good and so I just thank you for the people in this building that are doing good for the citizens and -- and I just lastly, God, pray for our Mayor and our Council Members that they would just have an extra measure of wisdom, so that they could make the right decisions for the -- for the -- for the citizens here in Meridian and so we just give that all to you, God, and it's in your name we pray, amen. Thanks for the opportunity. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Thank you. Council, we are at the adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: No changes this evening, so I move we adopt tonight's agenda as presented. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as presented. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Simison: Mr. Clerk, anyone signed up under public forum? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, nobody signed up. Simison: Okay. Councilman Overton. Overton: Take just a second. Mayor, Council, Members of the public, a week ago in this very room it was full. It was not full of people for a development, it was not full of people for or against, it was for people supporting a project. An addition that was a ninja course that was going to be added to Discovery Park. The whole reason that course came to be and be in front of us was a young girl and her name was Eva Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 3 of 39 Plimmer and she sat right here in this front row. Just a few days later she passed. A young girl passed way before her time. I just want to take just a couple minutes to recognize the fact that there is no age limit on being a champion in your community and she will forever be remembered as a champion in this community, even if we have had to lose her at such a short time. So, thank you for letting me have a minute and that I could get through those words. But every day is a gift and we need to remember that as we go through life. Thank you. Simison: Thank you, Councilman Overton. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I appreciate that from Councilman Overton. I think those of us who have children are -- we are kind of impacted a lot more than maybe we thought it would with that news. First, I just want to appreciate your leadership, Mayor and Councilman Cavener, for making sure that we could have the opportunity to weigh in on a project and to see a little girl's dream, what she envisioned kind of come to fruition not long before she passed away and it made me reflect a little bit on when we have tender mercies from God in our life that allow us a moment to pause and reflect and to feel a little bit uplifted and to feel a little bit encouraged that the world's not a bad place, that there is a lot of -- a lot of really good things and I just want to share a brief passage from Psalms. Withhold not thou thy tender mercies from me, O Lord, Let thy loving kindness and thy truth continually preserve me. And I think about that and I think that we witnessed a small tender mercy for all those of us on City Council, in the city, those that came, but I think the project will be a tender mercy and a continual reminder of a very very good thing and so I just really appreciate the opportunity we had to do that and extend our condolences to the family. Simison: Thank you. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: I echo Councilman Taylor's appreciation for you taking a lead on this and for the Council stepping up and -- and doing what needed to be done. I went home after last Tuesday's meeting and I googled Ninja Warrior and, you know, it says it's a reality show and it's where athletes tackle America's most challenging obstacles. I think what we witnessed last week was a little girl in her family tackling life's most difficult obstacles and we saw family and a little girl that did it with faith and perseverance and togetherness. The room was packed with supporters and, honestly, as I watched Eva and went home that night and contemplated what this Council had done, I wanted to -- had a desire to become a person more like Eva, somebody who looks outwardly, rather than inwardly, despite all the pain that she experienced. So, I'm proud of the way that Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 4 of 39 the community responded and stepped up to help this amazing young woman's dream come true and I think when that Ninja Warrior course is built it will be a legacy and a testament to the little girl and her family who dreamed a dream that became reality. So, thank you, Mayor. Simison: Well, I appreciate the meeting giving Council an opportunity to say a few words and I just want to extend condolences to the family. Services will be held this week and -- and, honestly -- but I know we are here and talking about this, but we lost two great and Eva was this last year. You know, what — what -- one — one much -- much in her age, but devotion to the community was nonetheless in that context and so maybe there is something in that name that just rings true, but both big losses, but this one is especially here and now for many and I know it will be a packed house on Friday as people come together to celebrate this young girl's life and so to the family on behalf of the city our condolences are with you and may she rest in peace. ACTION ITEMS 1. Final Plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision (FP-2024-0020) by David Evans and Associates, Inc., located near the South side of W. Amity Rd., midway between S. Meridian Rd. and S. Linder Rd. Simison: With that we will move on to our Action Items for this evening. First item up is final plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision, FP-2024-0020, and we will open this public hearing -- I know that's what -- we will hear from staff on this item. Allen: Council continued this item from last Tuesday's meeting in order to receive testimony from ACHD on the proposed private access to the existing residents on Lot 2 through the church property on Lot 1 . Since the last meeting the applicant submitted concept plans showing how temporary access is proposed to the existing home through the church property and that is the upper left-hand drawing there and how future access could be provided upon redevelopment of the lot through the property to the east once it redevelops and that is on the drawing on the left-hand side on the bottom. The applicant is requesting a revised change from that that they were proposing last week to Condition No. 10, which requires the ingress-egress easement on the church property on Lot 1 for the benefit of the existing home on Lot 2 to be temporary until such time as the adjacent property to the east redevelops and an alternate access is available. At that time the access easement would terminate and the driveway on the church property would be removed. The applicant's proposed change would allow the existing home to retain access through the church property until such time as the lot redevelops in the future. At such time the easement would terminate and access would be provided from the alternate accesses shown on the right. So, the drawings on the right show how access could be provided to that lot and how future development of that lot could occur. It doesn't mean it will, it's just some concept drawings of how it could. Staff has included the verbiage that the applicant is requesting changes to that condition on your hearing outline tonight. Thank you. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 5 of 39 Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Assuming we want to hear from applicant. Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward to make any comments? Connelly: All right. Well, thank you guys for allowing us the opportunity to present. I also just really quickly want to say I'm friends with the Plimmers and I just appreciate what you guys did. That's huge. I wasn't able to be here last week, but it meant a lot. So, thank you for that as well. Just real quick, we have -- we have been -- worked hard to be compliant. I'm sorry. Doug Connelly. And Bryan Appleby, who is our civil engineer. So, as Sonya had already expressed it, you know, we have been working hard to try to figure this out and get it -- get it going and she did a great job of explaining kind of where we are at right now, where we are at. I just want to make sure that there is clarity in this and so Exhibit 1 1 think that's on the screen right now shows the realign -- Mills driveway and -- was already proposed and recommended for temporary approval for the city planning and, then, the second slide is the one where the alternative future driveway access based on the city's current recommendations Condition No. 10, for change of location upon development of the property to the east. So, what we are doing is we are recommending that this change not be required as long as the Mills' residence remains unchanged or not redeveloped and the reasons why, just real quick, the topography is challenging, six and a half foot elevation difference and the slope is nine percent. The driveway would be less direct route to the -- the existing garage that you see there and, then, the driveway pavement would be excessively wide with the transition from the road stub to the existing circular driveway and so it's just not ideal for them currently and so our proposal, as she said before, is allowed temporary access to the property until redevelopment happens and that would give us access for the Mills, the current residents. And so, again, she already showed the possibilities. don't know if we need to go over that again, unless you want to, but just what it could be once it's redeveloped. It's really, ultimately, just the current wording just to make sure it's clear -- it's clear on what we are asking. The current No. 10 condition wording is the ingress-egress easement depicted on Lot 1, Block 1, for the benefit of lot 2, Block 1, shall be temporary until time that the alternate access is available for Lot 2, with development of the adjacent property. At such time the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2, via Lot 1, shall be removed. So, what I want to do — do you have the slide of the -- of the change that we want to make? The proposed Condition No. 10 wording, then, would basically be the same, but we would add: So, the ingress-egress easement depicted on Lot 1, Block 1, for the benefit of Lot 2, Block 1, shall be temporary -- temporary until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with the development of the adjacent property and here is where the change is. To the east of Lot 2, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 1, is redeveloped, E.G. residence is torn down, replaced by a new single family residence or further subdivided. At such time the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 via Lot 1 shall be removed. And so really that's what we are asking for tonight in that change, so -- Simison: Thank you. Council, questions? Okay. Thank you very much. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 6 of 39 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I know we don't have a public hearing, I -- some of my questions and confusion was about, again, some of the testimony we heard last night. It was uncertain if the temporary would go away with redevelopment and -- and so I think getting some clarity on that immediately satisfied what my concerns were. Unless there is any deliberation, I'm happy to make a motion for Council. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move that we approve Item No. 1, the final plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision, Application FP-2024-0020 as presented this evening. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second. Is there discussion on the motion? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I just wanted to check if the Condition 10 had been updated by staff or does the motion need to reflect the additional language that the applicant just presented? Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, yes, the motion should include the requested language by the applicant if you are in agreement with that. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Strader: Apologies. My -- my intention was is that is because it was presented this evening that that was inclusive of -- of the changes from the applicant. But happy to let my record reflect that my motion was to be inclusive of that as well. Thank you, Council Member Strader, for flagging that. Little Robert: Second concurs. Simison: And the second concurs. So, I think we at least have a path. Everyone understands what we are considering. Is there discussion? If not, clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Thank you very much. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 7 of 39 MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 2. Public Hearing continued from January 14, 2025 for 3970 E. Overland Rd. (H-2024-0053) by Dominic Pera, JGT Architecture, located at 3970 E. Overland Rd. A. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1.120 acres of land from the R- 1 zone in Ada County to the General Retail and Service Commercial District (C-G) zoning district for the construction of a 4,950 sq. ft. multi-tenant building with one side being used for a restaurant. Simison: I did see a lot of green pipe out there around that property. Anything to do with your project? Okay. Okay. Fair enough. With that we will move on to Item 2, which is public hearing continued from January 14th, 2025, for 3970 East Overland Road, H-2024-0053. Continue this public hearing with staff comments. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Before staff gives their comments I just want to say I was not here for the January 14th hearing, but I have been able to review the entire event and I'm prepared to make comments this evening. Simison: Thank you very much. Ritter: Good evening, Mayor and Council. So, this application was asked to be continued for additional input from all Council Members. Staff hasn't changed anything regarding their presentation for this annexation of this property into the city, but the applicant did put together some information that they would like to share with you prior to your deliberation. They would like to provide some additional clarity for you. Simison: Council, any questions for staff before we bring up the applicant? Okay. If the applicant would like to come forward. Wallgren: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Council. My name is Jerrod Wallgren with JGT Architecture at 1135 12th Avenue Road in Nampa. Linda has that presentation available. All right. Is that something I can control from here? Perfect. So, I'm representing the applicant for this request that is to annex a -- an existing parcel on Overland and Topaz into the city as a C-G zone. We are also requesting a waiver on the required buffer from 25 feet down to 15 feet. It's proposed to be a 4,900 square foot building. Most of it will be for a Vietnamese restaurant that will be owned and operated by the applicant. Last time there was some potential opposition expressed by a few members and from what I could tell nobody really had an issue with the use or the design per se or the buffer, it was just really more of the process by which, you know, Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 8 of 39 you would approve such a small parcel into an area and so we really haven't changed anything about the site, other than we have formalized this potential future access to the north, which we had as a garbage truck backup area. We have widened that out to be a future access to the north. We thought that was a good idea and I guess I'm hoping that we can kind of talk about the context of the area to illustrate how this property could develop in the future to be cohesive with its surroundings. The elevations remained unchanged. It will be a nice, attractive building that we will work with staff in design review and CZC to ensure that it meets city requirements. On this slide you can see how the area is developed. We have got an aerial photograph from 1992 contrasted against the present day and so you can see the -- the nice developments that have occurred in El Dorado and Silverstone and Eagle View Landing were able to be accomplished by the acquisition of these large parcels of land where they could master plan all of that with streets and infrastructure and stratified uses that really make sense and, unfortunately, that's left this, you know, enclave area here of these old rural residential parcels that they are big enough to develop commercially, but kind of too small to really plan all together, but we think this -- this site right along Overland works well to be annexed in as is and -- and work well with the area. You can see that enclaved area consists of 49 parcels that are currently R-1 zone in the county. The city has previously annexed three of those properties, Zamzow's being one, which is a C-G zone. There is kind of a peculiar sliver here that's an R-2 zone annexed into the -- the city and, then, the property immediately adjacent to our east is also a C-G zone. So, this position where we are bounded on one side by Topaz, Overland on the south and an already annexed parcel really makes a lot of sense to continue this commercial development along the road. You know, if we were talking about one of these parcels further to the north that was deep into the -- the neighborhood it certainly wouldn't make as much sense to have a restaurant, but in this position we think it makes perfect sense. It's just another reiteration of the -- the mixed-use regional zone future land use for the -- the area, which is intended to provide a mix of employment, retail, residential dwellings and public uses near major arterial intersections. We feel our project meets those requirements. This is a depiction of the roadways in the area. In discussion with ACHD they have no specific plans in the immediate future. They -- they intend Overland to be widened in like the 2036 Capital Improvement Plan and they did indicate that the city has a request in for a -- a vision of this View Circle Street to extend to Topaz down around the corner back to Overland and have a traffic signal at Movado. That would provide some good interconnectivity in the area and another potential option would be this new intersection where Rolling Hills meets Flatiron, which is currently restricted at those new Aren Apartments due to us presumably limiting large amounts of traffic through this residential street, that one could envision in the future if this were to develop commercially that that could be a good access point for interconnectivity. One other piece of background information to note in the area is that Five Mile Creek does subject a lot of the area to floodplain issues. Our property at the very northeastern corner has a little bit of floodplain in it, but it is out of our development area, so it doesn't really impact the project, but any, you know, future development to the north will be adversely impacted by floodway, which -- which could create challenges. With that being said, we kind of took a stab at a quick sketch of how these immediately surrounding parcels might develop. We provide that access both to the north and to the Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 9 of 39 east. If that property were to ever develop commercially, instead of the contractor's yard, one can envision how each of these parcels could be developed one by one, whether it's, you know, some residential townhouses along the creek, some office buildings, you could see how this -- this area could be connected and -- and provide access to different roads and future roads. You know, even if you were designing this whole area as a whole it would be a natural fit to put a commercial restaurant use right along the corner, so we think it's -- it's very appropriate. A few background images of the site we can refer to if we need to. There is various uses surrounding and across the street. This image here in the center left is the -- the existing site and so I guess in conclusion we are left with the -- the choice of, you know, if we don't annex this -- this parcel it remains a site with dilapidated buildings, weeds, dying landscape and as -- as an R-1 zone in the county the only possible development would be for a single family home, which I think we would probably agree that doesn't make any sense along a five lane gateway corridor, but if we approve this this evening be a way to redevelop that property with a nice restaurant to provide a service for the community. I think we can provide some connectivity to surrounding sites that will develop well in the future and the applicant, you know, everybody he has spoken with is supportive, you know, from his customers to neighbors to his -- his bank, they all think it's a great idea and I know I live about a mile from here and my wife and I are always commenting how we could use some more restaurant options. So, we would be excited about this and think it would be a great fit for the area and, hopefully, you know, some of the opposition expressed last time, maybe we provided some background information that helps sway you a little bit and with that I would ask for approval of this project and stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. If you could go back to the -- the slide where you showed your road network. Wallgren: This wheel is kind of slow. Strader: Thank you. This one. Perfect. Thank you. Yeah. And I -- I will just say like this one for me has been tough. I lost more sleep over this one since our last meeting, so I have been really thinking about it. This is helpful. What is the status of this Circle -- View Circle extension with ACHD? I'm not understanding where we are at as a city with that. You mentioned it was a request from the city. Is it a request to amend the master street map? Maybe this is a question for staff, actually, I think that you could chime in in a second, Mr. Mayor, if that's all right with you. Parsons: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, I think you hit it right on the head. It is a request from the city working in conjunction with ACHD to put a dashed line on a piece of property with a vision of a future collector somewhere in this general location. So, it's Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 10 of 39 just highlighted on their map and so when developers come in and ask us about what's required to develop my property, it starts that discussion, well, we have a dashed line going across your property, so we envision a collector road somewhere in this area as you pursue development of this property and typically anything on the master street -- this type of roadway, the way it's predicted -- presented on the map is all developer driven. So, it's nothing that ACHD builds or the city builds, it's, again, the developer coming forward with their development application and constructing that in accordance with both the city's and ACHD's adopted plans. Strader: Mr. Mayor, follow up? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: And so how do we -- because usually we don't see a lot of applications where we are having this kind of back and forth about whether the street -- master street map will be actually updated. Is there any kind of process -- like if we used -- if we put a condition in would you recommend that to try to get ACHD to adopt it or is there any other action needed on the city's part to try to move that plan forward? Parsons: Mayor, Members of the Council, not really. Again, ACHD's policies don't require it and, then, like anything roadways are widened and constructed based on trips, the volume, so it -- there is mechanisms to warrant certain things under their policies and something like this would not trigger anything as -- as the applicant has alluded to. So, again, with this application the best thing that we could hope for is there is a plan for the area, we have a mixed-use designated on it -- mixed-use designation on the property, so that means we envision a broad mix of uses on it. We do have some future plans for the extensions of roadways and reclassification of roadways, but, again, that will occur as development occurs and as trips and traffic warrants those upgrades or classifications changing, including the signal to Overland Road. Simison: And maybe to piggyback just a little bit -- and correct me if I'm wrong, but the project that Council recently denied, would it have extended to where View Circle would have started to be constructed or not? Parsons: Mayor, Members of the Council, correct. That -- so, if we head a little bit to the east on the other side of Rolling Hills Drive, that east-west portion where it's labeled View Circle, a portion of that would have been constructed with that project. Simison: Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: This is helpful and, you know, it's funny to focus on this connection to the north is sort of my attempt at trying to future proof everything, because I felt like, okay, if we Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 11 of 39 created more connectivity, even if this is a small parcel, it creates the potential that there can be a connection as needed. This -- I actually want to compliment you for providing this context, because I think it's -- it's very helpful. At least it paints a picture for me that there is a path forward at some point in the future for this area, as opposed to just like an enclave that -- that will always be isolated from the roadway network. That was kind of my fear in our last meeting. So, I will be open -- I think I may actually change the direction that I will vote on this once I have a chance to think about it for a bit. Thank you. Simison: Council, additional questions for the applicant? Okay. Thank you very much. Wallgren: Thank you. Simison: Mr. Clerk, do we have anybody signed up to provide testimony on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, yes. Anita Gallagher. Simison: Good evening. If you could give your name and address for the record. Gallagher: Thank you. My name is Anita Gallagher. I'm at 3825 Onyx Street, which is in the subdivision that he says is depleted houses. Thank you for letting me speak, Mr. Mayor and Council. The first question I have is at that site that he is talking about is showing everything for the Council, 1.12 acres. The for sale sign is .78. 1 don't know where the extra acreage is coming from. But I do have pictures of the for sale sign if you want to see. My second question is there is a project that's going to be coming up across the street on Topaz of the two acres and they want to turn it into 21 apartments, plus commercial space. If that's approved it would affect the access and traffic to Topaz, Onyx, Jade and Overland with the restaurant and the commercial space. Would this be a similar problem that you brought up at the last meeting over on Eagle and Ustick? That's a big question. Simison: Council, any questions or comments? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Thank you. It's kind of a quick question. I -- my understanding from years past previous council has attempted to kind of engage some of the -- you and your neighbors on what's the future look like here? You are, obviously, in a very rapidly developing part of the city. It kind of feels like this -- you know, the -- the center of the valley in -- in many ways. Have you -- could you describe what conversations maybe you have had with any of your -- your neighbors? Like what do you -- what do you envision sort of happening here? Or is it just leave us alone for a little bit, which I certainly can respect, but I'm just kind of curious what some of your -- if you could contextualize a little bit of your conversations about what does the future of this part of the city look like? Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 12 of 39 Gallagher: We really don't know for sure. I know there have been some people that just have bought the property probably within the last ten years and they are really happy with their property. I have been there for 20 -- almost 26 years. I have an acre. My yard looks like a park. I don't want it to go back -- you know, go away. I'm not ready to move. If I have to I guess I will have to, if I can get a good price for my property, but I really don't want to. And I have great fantastic neighbors. We are a nice little quiet neighborhood and I like living in Rolling Hills. You know, everybody knows everybody. Simison: All right. Thank you very much. Is there anybody else who would like to provide testimony on this item, either in the room or if you are online you can use the raise your hand function? Seeing no one raising their hand or coming forward, would the applicant like to make any final comments at this time? Wallgren: Mr. Mayor, Council, in response to the -- the last testimony I certainly didn't intend to refer to anybody's property as dilapidated other than this specific site. It -- it has a -- you know, what appears to be maybe an old auto service building and really buildings that are completely uninhabitable and unusable and so without an annexation that -- it -- it -- it's a property that just sits there and it really can't have any use that can be done with it. So, that's what I meant with that comment. As -- as far as traffic, the one item we did discuss with ACHD -- I mean they do have the ability to paint some lines along Overland that, you know, do not block this intersection lines, which don't exist now. That could be one way to alleviate some of the concerns with the traffic congestion of that intersection and it's -- it's kind of with the -- a little bit of hesitancy that I even master plan property like that that's not even part of the project, knowing that there are people that live there and, you know, it's -- it's awfully presumptuous to plan on developing something on someone's property that, you know, they could want to live there for the next 40 years and so that's why it's difficult to envision how this area will -- will develop and I think this -- our one little corner that's tucked up right along Overland works -- works pretty well, so -- if you have any other questions for me I would -- I would be glad to take them. Simison: Council? Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Wallgren, appreciate the update and the presentation. Does your client currently own that land? Wallgren: Not yet, no. He is under contract to purchase. Cavener: I do think it is important certainly what -- I think I have got a sense about where this one is headed, but it would be my hope that when your client takes possession that he moves rapidly to -- to clean up that area. Certainly it's not your applicant's fault of the current condition, but an annexation into Meridian, we take pride in our community, would hope that he would move expeditiously. I know sometimes it can be hard and I know we were kind of at a -- at a deadlock when you were here last before us. So, I appreciate your request for a continuance and giving you guys an opportunity to come back and give us a bit more flavor. I was -- I didn't recall that the -- Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 13 of 39 your -- your neighbor next to you had already annexed into the city. To me that's a big difference maker. That, plus the -- the connectivity that you have kind of provided with relocating kind of your truck turnaround I think solves some of the -- the bigger concerns that I had about, okay, what is the future of this and recognizing I -- I commend you for taking some creativity, saying this is what it could be. You don't want to tell anybody that's what's happening, I -- I appreciate that, but I at least applaud your -- your willingness to say they are demonstrating how this could potentially work with future development. So, as a big piece is that -- if your client takes ownership that he moves expeditiously to get that lot cleaned up. But I don't have any additional questions. Thank you. Wallgren: Thank you. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Mr. Wallgren, can you -- I think this was described as a multi-tenant building with one side being used as a restaurant. Are there plans for the other side or what use that might be? Wallgren: No specific plans at this point. That would be vacant shell that he would lease out to a potential tenant that would be applicable and complimentary to his business and he would be able to select who that was and -- and if we were -- Whitlock: Follow up? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Can you just confirm for me again -- you have addressed the cross-access to the north, but you have also included cross-access to the east; is that correct? Wallgren: That is correct. The annexation on the parcel to the east in their development agreement it did have a condition that if the site were to ever develop into something other than a contractor's yard that cross-access was to be provided to the neighboring parcels. So, we are connecting with that location. Whitlock: Okay. Thank you. Simison: Council, any questions for the applicant? Thank you. Wallgren: Thank you. Parsons: Mr. Mayor, Council, just for the record I want to provide some clarification to the resident that asked why the acreage was different than the -- the parcel size. Just for the record, just to clarify that, when applicants request to annex into the property we Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 14 of 39 have them go to the center line of the adjacent roadways. So, therefore, the annexation boundary is greater than the actual property they are going to develop. So, that's why you see that discrepancy and, then, also to Councilman Whitlock's question about uses, in the development agreement that we have proposed in the staff report we are limiting the site to develop with specific uses to try to minimize those impacts to adjacent residents and, then, one last piece of business tonight, if you decide to move forward with the -- the approval, keep in mind that the applicant did request a waiver to reduce that buffer along the north boundary. Simison: So, in this case the property boundary goes to center line of Overland and the center line of Topaz, which is what's giving it that extra dimensional size. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Maybe just a quick question for Linda or Bill. Would -- I -- I like the idea of the do not block this intersection. That seems like it could only help the situation. Is that just a staff level communication? Do we need a -- would we need a provision around that to try to highlight it? Help me understand how we would navigate that component. Ritter: Mayor, Council Woman Strader, we would reach out to ACHD and try to see if we can make that happen. So, it would be staff communicating with ACHD on that issue. Strader: Perfect. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I know we have got a resident who wanted to ask maybe a question that perhaps maybe staff could follow up with them and get any of the questions they want have answered, unless it's pertaining to the application and they just -- ma'am, if you come up and testify the applicant will also get another opportunity to provide the last word and if it pertains to the application that's before us we are happy to hear it, but if you have got more of a structural question our staff can -- okay. Mr. Mayor -- because we have got our -- a good -- for holding us accountable tonight on all things on the record, what I heard was that there is signage there, but the lines don't exist and I know that we have got our good colleagues from ACHD that are also on the call hearing this and so I have great faith that between great staff at the highway district and our great staff here at the city that will get those -- this request in to get those lines painted at the highway district's early ability. With that, Mr. Mayor, I move that we close the public hearing on Item No. 2. This is an annexation, H-2024-0053. Little Roberts: Second. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 15 of 39 Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there a discussion on the motion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: As the only one who didn't get to testify two weeks ago, if you would permit me a few minutes and a little history. I actually watched this twice, because it really resonated me a lot on a lot of the comments that were made by my fellow Councilmen. But I -- I got to go back in history a little bit. It was about 15 years ago I was at training in Canyon county and I was approached on a break by two members -- two elected officials, a city councilman and a commissioner over in Canyon county and they were commending the City of Meridian, that we -- our previous councils had done a fantastic job of preserving areas of our city for future development and how we did some of our larger developments, because they had not done such a good job and they had allowed some pockets to be developed that, then, prevented some of the developers from coming in and putting these master plans together and it made me pretty proud to know that we had some pretty forward thinking folks ten, 15 years ago on our city council as we were deciding what our master plan was and I can't help but worry about some of the projects like this that if this was an in-fill, if this was the end of the development and we already had everything else developed and I was looking at this project coming in I wouldn't have a problem with it. It would be a perfect in-fill project. But the problem I have is it's all open still. You know, when Eagle and Franklin, the southeast corner, developed it took years, but they bought every single house and if they hadn't done a master plan project we wouldn't have St. Luke's Hospital and all the buildings and restaurants that surround that. It was time consuming. It was well laid out. It was well designed and as a city we benefited from a great product. The same things happened at Silverstone Plaza. We master planned this into a great commercial corner. We have done this multiple times throughout our city. But if we would have had some of these projects that almost become speed bumps or handicaps to us doing some of those larger products, they wouldn't have happened and what worries me with this one, because now we have heard there is already another one in the pipeline and we have already approved and annexed land next to it, is we are starting to possibly limit what someone could come in and do as a master plan for this area that would give us that collector street and bring it out to Movado, because you can put that yellow line on the screen for everybody to see, but it's an imaginary line to me until we get some sort of master plan that comes forward that says this is what we want to do. That's all it is. And I'm really having a tough time supporting, mind you, successful restaurant, great restaurant, I have no doubt. It's not personal, it's how we preserve some of these areas. This is our one shot on whether we want to try to preserve this corridor for something larger or if we want to let this establish lot by lot by lot, because the discussion that happened two weeks ago there was quite a bit that had to do with we Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 16 of 39 need to have connectivity to the north. We have already got connectivity to the east. But the problem is lot by lot we have no idea what's going to happen on those lots. So, it's impossible for us as a Council to say where that connectivity should be and what it's going to go to, where when we master plan something on a much larger scale there is an idea of what type of buildings, restaurants, retail, residential that's going to go into those spots and I just -- I just caution all of us as we look at this, this is a pretty unique opportunity for this section of land. We know there is quite a few people here, because we have already had one application, that are already willing to sell, because we have already had an application before us. We turned it down, because not everybody was willing to sell and we created more problems than we fixed with that one. We weren't there yet, but we were darn close and I'm just afraid that if we approve this as we continue to approve we are just handicapping ourselves on how this could eventually redevelop in the future. Just my thoughts. Simison: Seeing no one else jumping in right away, I will weigh in just briefly on this, because I -- I think there is a lot of wisdom in that one, but I also think that there is another side to this equation. I mean this is -- this property is in a -- nothing can exist on this property but through redevelopment. Yeah. I don't see how you could do anything here. And the one thing I don't want to do is be in a situation where we tell a property owner they -- they can never do anything with this property, because let's say they want to come in and put a house on it. Well, is that what we want? We want a house next to a seven lane road and they want to hook up to water and sewer, because that's going to be a requirement for any -- any development on this property is going to -- we are going to tell everyone you got to come to the city for water and sewer. If this was an inhabitable property that had, you know, some current -- what I would say in my opinion current value, waiting may be the right decision, but to say that nothing could ever happen here, if that's what the outcome is I don't know that I personally think that's the best option to tell a property owner or a future property owner you just have to leave it the way it is, because we are not going to let you develop it in the county and you are going to come to the city and when you come in the city we are going to want you to develop the way the city wants you to develop it, but you can't do it, because everything else is ready to develop. I see a little bit of a circle or challenge with this, because of the current state of the property and I just want to get -- make sure that the property owners have an opportunity to have a little property because I think it's the best interest of all of us to have a livable property in this location, not a -- no one's going to do anything with this property scenario. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: There is one thing I have learned and that's Councilman Overton's got a lot of wisdom and -- and perspective he brings to a lot of discussion. I really appreciate that. One of my concerns tonight with -- with this is if we decide that it's not appropriate to annex this property, we are effectively setting a precedent where we are going to be saying to be consistent and fair this whole property that we are looking at right here it Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 17 of 39 will not develop until there is a better more comprehensive plan and I have gone back and forth on that, because I -- you know, we have had a couple of property -- or projects here in this area and I think there is a -- I think that resonates with me on a level, but I also -- you know, the plan is a mixed-use development here, so what we are missing is the specifics of what it looks like. Specifically how each parcel might be connected together. And I recall not too long ago, just a few weeks ago, we looked at a very large development where we had sort of bubble -- I think the phrase was a bubble plan with the details to come in later and unanimously approved that, because we -- again, we had a single developer who was -- we had confidence would come back with a lot of the specifics. We are missing that here and I acknowledge that. We are missing that -- the specifics of interconnecting the parcels. But in my mind we have a plan. The plan is mixed-use. We don't have the details of the plan. So, again, it's circular. It's chicken or the egg. What comes first. If this parcel were maybe a quarter of a mile off Overland, if it was tucked back in with the homes, it's a nonstarter. I think we clearly know what that would look like. If this was a development much larger with much higher traffic count with maybe a multi-family use, I -- I -- I think we -- our discussion is different. I wish we had a master plan that we could be looking at, but we don't and that -- I kind of was asking, you know, what -- what do the neighbors want. You know, next year neighbor to the east may decide it's time to sell and move on, you know, sell their property. Someone wants to stick around for a while. Others want to leave. You just -- you never know and this is a really -- really really challenging. But to me I think it's fundamentally unfair to tell someone who has the property that is following the guidance provided with a mixed-use development, the type of uses that are allowed there, I think it's fundamentally unfair to say you can't do it, especially if you own the property and I think, Mayor, you bring a good point. If we don't do this what are we going to put here? A home? That was my first thought. They could build a home. But that's a bad idea. So, this property sits essentially landlocked almost in a way of what we have here. So, I -- I -- I appreciate that the -- you -- you have provided cross-access, you know, with your updated design with connecting to the northern parcel. We don't know what that would look like. Again, last week I would remind this Council we had a long discussion about these in-fill projects and -- and -- and putting those projects together and we approved it, even though we didn't know what the cross-access would look like, but we did it. At some level in order to build out our city we require developers and property owners to work with the city in a way that achieves our vision. May not be exactly how we envision it up here today, but as long as they are following some guidelines that we have laid out pretty clear, then, we should allow them to move ahead and I think what we have here is -- they have done what we have asked, they have provided the cross- access, they are going to build the stub street essentially to -- whatever that parcel to the north is. I don't see the traffic count being a noticeable problem. Yes, traffic is not great there, but that -- adding this -- annexing this in is not going to add to that. So, I did go back and forth, but I think I'm going to come down where I would like to see this project go forward, because if we don't, then, I would say that it should be incumbent on anyone who is listening tonight don't bring us a project here, because it would be fundamentally unfair to say no to this person and yes to the next one. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 18 of 39 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I'm happy to weigh in. I was not supportive of this request last week and like Council Member Strader, it's kind of caused some sleepless nights and when a meeting ends we don't stop thinking about these projects and -- and this one has certainly sat with me and it came up a lot quicker than I -- I anticipated. Council Member Overton, you bring up a really valid point about, you know, kind of catalyst projects that change and you look at certainly The Village and what's happened at, you know, Overland where there was -- you know, big -- big and small pieces of dirt coming together to do something unique. I -- I see some similarities in this, but I -- I also kind of tend to look at this like this is a very large in-fill area and it kind of tracks, because it's complicated and frustrating as a lot of our in-fill projects are. I think where I have landed is that, you know, certain types of use along Overland I do think makes sense. I guess what I'm saying is developing east and west right now makes sense in that kind of piecemeal fashion for me. How does each, you know, have that frontage piece play out, because that can help also invite what a gateway would look like in this area. Developing north and south without even a bubble plan would be really really difficult. The cross-access pieces to me I think gives good flexibility for when the north and south does start to develop. I guess the -- the north ones start to develop that it will give -- I think it preserves the opportunity to do some master planning around it that is complimentary to some of the existing businesses that you are not -- and just around this area, but also to the north along Flatiron. That's going to be a critical piece as well. So, this is a case where I think it continues for me -- allowed me to think a little bit more about this, look at it a little bit more holistically, really focus on east to west makes more sense than the north and south and so I think I will likely be in favor of -- of this project this evening. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Since my good colleague to the right shared an experience from the past that he is proud of, I will share one that I'm not proud of. I got -- I got thrown out of a softball game once on a -- on a called third strike, because I told the umpire the only thing he was consistent at was being inconsistent. What I see here is some consistency. I see a business developed to the east. I see Zamzow's to the west. If I go farther to the west up to Eagle and, then, past Eagle I see some consistency and I mentioned this at the last hearing on this -- this -- the frontage along Overland. I think that's consistent. When you look to the south of Overland you see apartment buildings and -- and I think you will see consistency to the south moving to the east on Overland as well, so that there is some consistency. I don't know what will be built to the north, but I was sympathetic to the -- to the arguments that we -- we need to be able to provide some cross-access. We need that access if and when that area to the north develops. So, in my mind I think this project is consistent with what we already have annexed and what is consistent with a frontage along a very busy roadway and I think the -- the applicant has come back and addressed the concerns that were raised at the last hearing about still maintaining and preserving an opportunity to have access in the future for whatever Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 19 of 39 is developed and that maybe 20 years, 40 years down the road. I don't know. But I -- again, I -- I support consistency and I -- I think that this project is consistent with what already has been approved and what is appropriate along the frontage there of Overland. So, I will be supportive of this project tonight. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, thank you to the applicant tonight for really taking to heart our concerns and coming back with the stub streets and things. I think that's been a big help. The traffic at that corner, that's a pretty regular route for me. I am concerned there, but I think that this -- hopefully that there is signage and with the painting will help let people know to not block that intersection, because I also think that that's a great spot for a restaurant. There is not a ton of restaurants right there in that area and I think that that's definitely got potential to maybe be a gateway if and when this -- or when the rest of this area does develop, because it could be a very long time. So, with those changes I will be supporting the project. Cavener: All right. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Good deliberation, Council, but I'm prepared to make a motion. After reviewing all staff, applicant testimony I move that we approve application H-2024-0053 as presented this evening, which is -- the day earlier today -- the 28th of January and note the reduction of the north boundary as requested by the applicant. Whitlock: Second. Parsons: Councilman Cavener, would you -- Simison: Have a motion and a second. Parsons: -- want to include cross-access to the north as shown on the concept plan? Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I -- I probably should be more clear. Because that was presented this evening by the applicant I -- I tried to reference that as their part of their testimony. Yeah. That was inclusive within my motion, the exhibit that's before us. Whitlock: Second agrees. Simison: And the second agrees and that is the case. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 20 of 39 Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, nay; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: Five ayes. One nay. And the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE NAY. 3. Public Hearing for Fairview Drive-through (H-2024-0049) by Ethan Mansfield, Hawkins Company, located at 4300 E. Fairview Ave. A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through facility for a coffee shop that is within three hundred (300) feet of another drive- through facility and an existing residence. B. Request: Modified Development Agreement to create a new Development Agreement to establish the hours of operations to begin service of the coffee shop at 5:OOam and approve new concept plans. Simison: With that we will move on to Item 3, public hearing for Fairview drive-thru, H- 2024-0049. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Ritter: So, this application is for a conditional use permit and a development agreement modification. It's a -- the property is located at 4300 East Fairview Avenue. The conditional use permit for the development of a 18,143 square foot quick lube oil change facility and drive-thru coffee shop within the CUP is because it's within 300 feet of another drive-thru, which is a bank that is next door and the existing residence to the north and the development agreement modification is to establish new hours of operations for the coffee shop to begin service at 5:00 a.m. The current development agreement states that businesses cannot begin until 7.00 a.m. and they end at 7.00 p.m., but they are only asking for the coffee shop to begin at 5:00 a.m., because Human Bean that is their business operations at all their locations begin operation at 5:00 a.m. The quick lube shop will begin operation at 8:00 a.m. and end at 7:00 a.m. We had a previous -- we have a condition in the staff report that states that the applicant previously had parking spaces -- back here seven parking spaces and we felt that those parking spaces interfered with the flow of traffic for the lube shop and the coffee shop drive-thru, so we asked that those spaces be relocated to the south side of the property or that the application -- the applicant will provide a site plan that both staff and the applicant agreed upon and we also were asking -- the applicant was asking for a waiver from City Council to add a -- the trash enclosure within the existing landscape buffer, since there was already -- the trash enclosure for the bank was already located in it and they were just going to expand on it, the trash enclosure, but the applicant is placing the trash enclosure outside of the landscape buffer now, so that waiver is no longer necessary and, then, based on the site plan that was provided staff and the applicant felt that the flow of this new site plan that is here meets the intent and it does not -- it still provides cross-access on the north side of the building -- on the north side of the Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 21 of 39 property and on the south side of the property. Access to the property is from Fairview Avenue. So, there is good queuing for the drive-thru and it's great flow for cars that go into the lube place. They meet the required parking standards for this building and the type of businesses that are in here. These are the building elevations that were provided. They are just conceptual building elevations. They have not been approved. They still have to go through design review. Showing the lube location and the coffee shop. This portion is the coffee shop and this is the -- the base for the lube business. So, the conceptual building elevations consist of stucco, stone, wood and metal accent. Again, the final design is required to comply with our design standards in our architectural standard manual on anything that is recorded with a development agreement. So, again, asking for a development agreement modification just to change the business hours of the coffee shop from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. The current development agreement says that business begins at 7:00 a.m. and ends at 7:00 p.m. So, these are the pictures of the current site and with that I will stand for any questions that you may have on this particular application. But there -- excuse me. There were some comments which are listed in the document that you have. The last comment was received today or yesterday regarding the hours of operations for the proposed coffee shop and mentioned Ada county's noise ordinance. So, with that I will stand for any questions you may have. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton? Overton: Just a quick education question. The coffee shop is, obviously, a drive-thru. Ritter: It is. Not the Tube oil. Overton: The lube oil is not a drive-thru even though it's got two lanes and they are driving through? Ritter: That is accurate. Overton: Correct? Just making sure I understand. Ritter: Absolutely. Overton: Thank you. Ritter: Not a drive-thru. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 22 of 39 Cavener: Linda, thanks for the -- the report. I -- I want to make sure I -- my recollection is correct. This is -- part of this borders the city of Boise; right? Ritter: It does. Boise is right next door. Cavener: So, Mr. Mayor, Linda, I don't know how to do this, it's been a month since we have had an application that kind of touches, you know, another city's border. Do we do any kind of proactive engagement with the city of Boise about, hey, we share a border. I know it's in Meridian, but in terms of -- I guess maybe I call good neighbor engagement, do we communicate with them? Do we solicit any feedback or comments? Is that something that we don't do by policy, but do sometimes in practice? I feel like in the past we have had a few applications where Boise's provided some commentary. I just didn't see any this time around. Parsons: Mayor, Members of the Council, it depends on the application. So, if it's -- say, for example, there -- there is a property owner that's in the city -- the Boise city area of impact and they want to be part of Meridian, we send them to Boise to say are you okay if we amend our map and they join us and -- because we can provide services and vice-versa. It goes back and forth. But in this typical situation, no, we would not transmit a conditional use or DA modification to the city of Boise for comment. Cavener: Thank you, Bill. Thanks, Linda. Appreciate it. Simison: Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward? Mansfield: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Council Members. Lovely to see you all tonight. I will just wait for Linda to pull up my presentation and, then, I will introduce myself. I'm Ethan Mansfield representing Hawkins Companies, 855 West Broad Street, Boise, Idaho. 83702. We are the developer on this project on behalf of Oil Changers and Human Bean. I guess my presentation is a little too meaty for the computer, but I promise I won't talk about every single slide. Thanks, Linda. So, I don't have too much to add above what Linda talked about. I think she covered it really well. We worked after the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation of approval to get a site plan that worked for both staff and our users. I'm having a little bit of a challenge changing slides. I'm just pressing the arrow. Great. So, here is the overall location. You can see primary access is going to be taken off of Fairview Avenue, with secondary access being off of Venture Street, which, as Linda noted, has cross-access provisions on the south side and the north side of the property. Here is an improved site plan. We are providing 12 parking spaces. That's a 6.5 per thousand square foot ratio. It's over double what is provided. We are really happy that we were able to pull the trash enclosure outside of the landscape buffer, so that we can provide additional screening for the residential properties to the north and, you know, that's pretty much it. I'm happy to answer any questions. It's relatively straightforward. We are noting -- Human Bean is requesting a 5.00 a.m. to 7.00 p.m. hours of operations. This is consistent with every other Human Bean in Meridian and also across the valley. So, it's very standard. If you would like to -- you know, here is an overview of each of the locations in Meridian and Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 23 of 39 so we respectfully request your approval of both the conditional use permit and the development agreement modification. Thank you very much and I will stand for any questions. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Thank you, Ethan. Council, questions? Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor and Ethan, thanks for being in front of us tonight. So, how close is the house and do they have any issues with it starting at 5:00 a.m? I live really close to a Human Bean, not close enough to hear them, though, but I know that when I'm out walking the dog they have got a pretty decent line at 5:00 a.m. Mansfield: Sure. Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Little Roberts, that is a great question. We are about 280 feet from the nearest residential property. So, they are pushed very far forward on their lot. There is a big backyard and, then, there is that 25 foot landscape buffer and, then, our development. So, there is -- there is quite a bit of space and there is a -- actually a requirement in the city code, if I'm not mistaken, to limit the noise from the drive-thru to the property boundary. So, that is a requirement of your code already, as well as there is a noise ordinance for the City of Meridian that also controls noise. So, amplified noise isn't supposed to be heard in anybody's house and we can make sure that's -- we follow that. Little Roberts: Thank you. Simison: And just to clarify, you said 250 feet from the property boundary. You mean from the house structure? Mansfield: Mr. Mayor, that's correct. From our structure to the house structure -- Simison: Okay. Mansfield: --just about 280 feet. Simison: Okay. Just want to make sure we are hearing the same thing. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Mansfield, you will have to forgive me, I'm -- I'm not a -- I'm not a patron of Human Bean. I hope you don't hold it against me. Do they -- do they use a -- you said -- you used the term amplified. Do they use like a speaker to -- I speak into a speaker to take the order and they speak in a speaker to report back to me like a Starbucks or other -- other similar type of industries? Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 24 of 39 Mansfield: You know, I'm going to just check in with our development partner Bronson, who actually speaks frequently with Human Bean. I, too, do not frequent Human Bean, so you are not alone. Bronson, is it correct that they do not use amplification? Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, we can absolutely get clarity, but we don't think that there is actually any amplification involved in this. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: To me that's an important element. So, if you can get that answer to us by the conclusion of the public hearing maybe in your closing comments that would be helpful. Mansfield: Absolutely. Simison: So -- so, I guess that -- for clarification are -- are you suggesting that they have someone out talking directly to the person? Is that what you are -- I can say I have been through Human Bean enough with my wife, but I don't recall someone ever coming out and taking our order as we are waiting, especially if there is no other cars there. I -- I just want to make sure we understand -- we are talking the same -- the same thing. Is that what you are talking about? If that's your model? Mansfield: Mr. Mayor, yeah, we will get clarification on exactly how it works. I know that sometimes at the busy periods a shop like Dutch Bros obviously will have some folks, you know, walking outside. I have -- haven't seen that at Human Bean. But, again, Mr. Cavener, I'm not a Human Bean patron very frequently. So, I will get clarification on exactly like how much amplification -- you know, is it amplified. Is it in person. Simison: And through a kiosk or if you are talking directly face to face to a person. think -- is that the basic -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I think what -- I'm what I'm trying to confirm is that my opinion one person talking to another to take a coffee order creates a certain amount of sound, much less than if somebody's, you know, repeating something back in an amplified speaker and a -- so, that -- that's what I'm trying to get to understanding is how the orders are taken and how that impact -- and how that process would impact the residents that surround it. Simison: And I'm really trying to remember personally, just like -- I know we -- I know we have driven up enough when it's not busy that we talk directly to them, but I know I have also sat in line for a while and I can't imagine that we didn't order until we got up there. Cavener: Yeah. Thanks, Mr. Mayor. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 25 of 39 Simison: That meant nothing coming from me, so -- Council, any other questions at this time? Okay. Thank you. Mansfield: Thanks very much everyone. Simison: Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up to provide testimony? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, yes. I apologize for mispronouncing, but Marlene Aspiazu. Simison: Good evening, Marlene. If you can speak into the microphone and state your name and address for the record. Aspiazu: My name is Marlene Aspiazu and I live at 4285 East Venture Place and I am directly behind everything that's going on and my only thing is -- I don't have a problem with, you know, any of that coming in at all. What my problem is I would -- I would like to have like a barrier wall, because where I live in my backyard it faces Venture. It faces Fairview. So, I can see all the -- the cars and the lights going by, which is okay. But when I notice that when people -- cars come into the parking lot -- into the lot and our glass or -- or where we live our back -- our house is basically all glass, so we can see all the lights when they -- when anyone comes into the parking lot. So, if they had the coffee shop I'm -- I'm assuming I would probably see the car lights and the brake lights, you know, like early in the morning, because it would be dark, you know. But that was my -- and that's why I would like to have like a -- a sound barrier, because we are directly right behind and I can -- because even now when they pulled into where those -- where that little -- where he is selling all those little shed things, you can see all the car lights and -- and everything. So, I would just like to have a barrier wall, because right now we do it -- there is a fence there, but it's kind of like -- it's kind of like -- it has like little like cracks in it and apparently maybe our ground is a little bit lower than up there, because it's -- because we can see everything when the -- when the -- when the cars come in, so I'm pretty sure in the coffee shop we are going to be seeing them going in this way, going out that way and that's the only thing that I was concerned about. Simison: Thank you. Council, questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: It's Marlene? Aspiazu: Yes. Cavener: Thank you for being here tonight. I'm always curious -- you know, there is lots of steps that happened before something lands before the City Council. Aspiazu: Uh-huh. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 26 of 39 Cavener: Have you had an opportunity to speak with the applicant about that request? Aspiazu: Yes, I did. And he said that it would be too expensive -- it would be too much money to put a barrier wall. Cavener: Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Aspiazu: You are welcome. Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions? Okay. Thank you. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, that was everyone. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody else present that would like to provide testimony on the item, either in the room or online? If you are online you can use the raise your hand feature or if you are in the room please come forward. Seeing none, would you like to come forward to close. Mansfield: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I would just first like to address the question of amplified noise from Council Member Cavener. We just spoke with the franchisee for Human Bean. She has 12 locations across the Treasure Valley. Only one has amplified noise and she would prefer not to have amplified noise at this location. What happens is they -- the customers will order at the window and if it gets busy they will send a runner out to take orders. So, to clarify, there will be no amplified noise. Secondly, would like to address our neighbor's concerns about impacts to her property. I one hundred percent understand that and, actually, we had plans to construct a closed vision fence along the northern boundary. We are -- you know, probably something like vinyl, so it didn't have gaps in it. We are more than happy to do that. We did see -- it wasn't a condition of approval, because there is a fence already there, but, you know, understanding that fence may be in slightly less than new condition, we are more than happy to install a new closed vision fence on our -- and -- and we can even make sure that it's far enough into our property that it doesn't experience that grade loss that she was explaining, because I do think that's an important element; right? Because you have got -- obviously, if the headlights are three feet above the ground. So, we are -- we can absolutely commit to installing a closed vision fence. Simison: Council, any questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Just a comment, Mr. Mansfield. I appreciate that. I got to be real up front with you, I was not supportive of this conditional use permit for those very reasons and knowing that you have got an applicant or a client that is not going to be using any amplification and are doing your part to address the -- the -- the headlights that are Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 27 of 39 going to be entering her -- enter her home in the mornings, those satisfied my -- my main concerns, so I appreciate your productive work on that. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Just a clarification from staff while the applicant is still up here. If they install a fence under our current city code we can't have two fences back to back, they have to be a certain distance apart if I'm not mistaken. Parsons: Mayor, Members on the Council, you can. You can't have double fencing when it's common lot to common a lot. So, this wouldn't be that -- that instance. But if the property owner is amenable maybe they can tear down the old fence and put up a new fence in the same spot, depending on how their construction plans come out and what the development of the site looks like. So, I -- I think there is some flexibility for the applicant, but I also want to assure that -- the neighbor and the Council that the code does require fencing. Applicant was correct, existing fencing, so we didn't require them to put in fencing, so -- Overton: Totally get that. Simison: And it's a minor thing, but the property lines don't match up that -- there is a portion of the -- at least according to this -- portion of the -- Mary's property that would not have the same fence line, because it goes on to some of this. So, I think it's working together to determine what's the most appropriate way or place to figure out what makes sense, so it doesn't extend to the property to the east. Okay. Cavener: I don't have any other questions. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move that we close the public hearing on Item No. 3. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item H-2024- 0049. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 28 of 39 Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Council, on a conditional use permit, very narrow pathway for kind of us weighing in. Certainly the development agreement gives us a little bit more latitude. Again, appreciate the neighbor kind of flagging that concern and the applicant moving quickly to make sure that those concerns were addressed. I voiced what I thought were my concerns earlier. I think they have largely been adhered to and so unless there is any deliberation, I'm -- I'm prepared to make a motion. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move that we approve Item No. 3, application H-2024-0049, include all staff and applicant and -- and public testimony, noting a couple of important pieces, which is that in the development agreement that this site will not use any form of electronic amplification to communicate and the applicant will construct -- the applicant will work with the area neighbors to construct a fence that would block the light from the -- the vehicles that are entering the property. And, Linda, I know I -- I really kind of stumbled through that and so if there is any concern I expect you to set me straight. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Okay. Good luck. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 4. Public Hearing for Werre (SHP-2024-0004) by Benjamin Semple, Rodney Evans and Partners, LLC., located at 2945 W. Ustick Rd. A. Request: Short Plat to subdivide an existing parcel consisting of 3.123 acres of land into two (2) building lots in the R-4 zoning district. Simison: Next item up is Item 4, a public hearing for SHP-2024-0004. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Ritter: Okay. Our next application is for a short plat to divide 3.123 acres of land into two lots. It's an existing parcel. The property was annexed in 1992 as part of the Candlelight Subdivision development. It wasn't part of that plat. It was on only annexed Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 29 of 39 and received the R-4 zoning. There is an existing single family home that will remain on Lot 1 and it will be accessed via a shared driveway off of North Morello Avenue. The proposed driveway to the existing house shall be paved with the capability of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. The applicant is not proposing any new fencing as there is fencing along the perimeter of the property. The applicant will be closing off the -- this access to Ustick Road and they will be removing the fencing from Morello Drive -- Morello Avenue, so that they can take access to the property. They are required to provide a 25 foot wide street buffer along Ustick and the landscaping has to meet the requirements of our UDC. They will be required to provide a multi -- a ten foot multi-use pathway. The landscaping shall be measured from the back of the curb and the ACHD is anticipated widening Ustick Road. So, currently this is a landscaping that is along Ustick Road, but that does not meet city standards and we have talked to the applicant about this, but this is proposed widening for Ustick along the -- this is the property here. So, the applicant will have to work with ACHD, because we did put in a condition, Condition No. 8, that if the landscape buffer has not been installed prior to ACHD widening of Ustick and the installation of the multi-use pathway, the applicant shall submit a surety for the landscape buffer prior to engineer -- city engineer's signature. So, the applicant stated that ACHD is in the process of purchasing the right of way along the front of the property, so that property will be ACHD soon. The applicant -- so, according to the applicant ACHD plans for the frontage to include a four foot wide planter area that they typically install with gravel. The applicant states that the property owner will work with ACHD to determine what has been planned so they can develop the surety number for the future installation of the planned materials. So, we do want the applicant to work with ACHD to enter into a license agreement for any landscaping placed within the right of way. This is a continuation of the widening of Ustick Road going all the way to Linder. And these are pictures of the current property. There were no comments -- written comments received on this project. I did talk to one of the neighbors that was at the end of the dead end road who inquired about the property. Don't know if they are online or in here tonight, but did have a conversation about that. Pretty straightforward project. Still keeping some nice lots along there. According to the applicant they will be building a home for their parents on that additional lot. So, with that I'm happy to answer any questions that you may have. Simison: Thank you, Linda. Council, any questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward. Good evening. Semple: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Members of City Council. Ben Semple with Rodney Evans and Partners, 1450 West Bannock Street, Boise, Idaho. 83702. I'm here representing Jason Werre. He is the property owner and he -- I want to first thank Linda for her presentation and working with us on the staff report. We are in agreement with all conditions of approval contained within, as well as any of the agency comments. We have been in conversation or coordination with ACHD regarding that frontage there. They have indicated that they -- it sounds like their plan is to get that thing installed within a year and so we were working with them to figure out what does that improvement look like, how much is that surety. My client is going to provide that surety to ACHD for the installation of that material, whatever it may be, and so we are really Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 30 of 39 looking forward to this project moving forward. He does live on the property in the existing single family home right now. He is -- his parents live in another part of Meridian, but he is splitting this to build them a home there. We will run all utilities in from Morello Avenue and, then, close the entrance off Ustick just to make that a consistent frontage along there. I want to note that because we are not entirely sure where ACHD's curb line is falling, we have measured our landscape buffer from the back of sidewalk. So, there is 25 feet of landscaping, plus about another hundred feet of landscaping between that and the existing home. The future home will fall on the lot somewhere where we are not cutting down any trees and we will provide some additional landscaping as you can see typical for residential within Meridian. I did get a phone call from -- I believe the same neighbor at the end of the street there. They were wondering about the use of the property upon the split. So, it's another single family home and, then, some of the condition of that fence at the end of Morello is a little questionable shall we say. So, the -- my client's looking to replace what he needs to to make sure everybody is whole, so that dogs don't go in the yards where they don't belong. I guess I would stand for any other questions you may have. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant? All right. Thank you very much. Semple: Thank you. Simison: Do we anyone signed up on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, nobody marked that they wanted to speak. Simison: Okay. Well, if you would like to speak go ahead and come -- I know there is several people, so just come on up and sit in the front row and everyone will take their turn. Could you state your name and address for the record, be recognized for three minutes. Brown: So, I am Jeff Brown. I live -- I am the president of the HOA for Candlelight and I'm a little bit concerned about extending Morello and what that looks like, whether we are going to have sidewalk, whether we are going to have curbing. I envisioned a cul- de-sac. It -- it appears that it's something different, but if we are going to have sidewalk and curbing and it's going to be wide enough, then, the HOA doesn't have a problem. Simison: Okay. Council, any questions? Can staff answer that question or -- Ritter: Mayor, Council, so Morello is not extending. It's just the driveway coming off of there. So, the roadway will not be extended. As you can see on the plan here there is just a driveway going into the property to serve both blocks. There is no extension of the roadway. Brown: Okay. Well, that's kind of a problem. I mean it would be good if we had -- if we continued the sidewalk, if we continued the look of the street. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 31 of 39 Ritter: So, it's a dead end street that just has a driveway coming off of it going onto someone's property at the end of that roadway. So, it's this property at the end of the roadway that does not have a road that is continuing through there, it's just a driveway. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Brown, I think what I -- what I'm hearing is you are -- you are asking for is you want -- you actually want a pedestrian connection to go from Morello to Ustick, is that what I'm kind of inquiring? Maybe you can give Council a little bit more understanding as to what -- what the concern is of the homeowners association. Brown: Well, as it stands now we have a roadblock and what they are proposing is a driveway. What -- where -- what we would like to see is the continuation of the sidewalk and the curb and gutter to a certain extent. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Brown, where -- where -- where was the -- I just need to understand. Brown: Well, because -- because they are going to continue Morello into a driveway and what we are suggesting is that they continue the curb and gutter to -- to a certain extent at least Into the T and in -- and in continuing the curb and gutter that they continue the sidewalk as well at least into the T and, then, create the driveway after that. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Brown. I appreciate it. Simison: Okay. Next? Springer: Hi. My name is -- my name is Connie Springer. 3072 North Carlo Avenue. This mostly affects me. My house is right there on that corner. I'm the one who made all the phone calls. It's my dogs I'm worried about. The owner walked over. We walked through the whole thing. I'm perfectly fine with it. He -- he did a great job stabilizing my concerns. So, I'm fine with it. It's going to be my front yard just so you know. Simison: Thank you. Appreciate it. Fletcher: Mr. Mayor, Council persons, appreciate you hearing us out on this. My name is Devin Fletcher. Address is 2891 West Joust Street, which happens to be in the Candlelight neighborhood. I would love to see this project, especially feeling for the owner that wants to have his parents live next door to him and split the lot. The only concern I would have is -- if we could go back to the collage of five pictures. The owner -- right there. Go back if you could. Right there. The picture -- two pictures. My Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 32 of 39 apologies. On the right is what the current owner has put up for a fence as a buffer zone for Ustick. My -- my opinion on that is -- is although it's actually a pretty cool fence, it doesn't aesthetically match the surroundings. That -- along that Ustick Road that ACHD is going to widen, of course we have the sidewalk, but all the other subdivisions have community vinyl fencing that's white, fairly common thing. It tends to be an oddball lot aesthetically. It just doesn't quite match. I would love to see something that looks similar to what the other subdivisions -- since this is going to be the back of their property now, this will be the north side of the property if you are looking at the plat. You know, I would hate to see them have to tear this fence out and do something different, but it's just not aesthetically pleasing, doesn't match the area. That would be my only concern. Otherwise, I think it's a good lot split. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Come on up. Wenger: Hi there. I'm Heather Wenger. I live on North Morello Avenue as well and I'm sorry I didn't -- if there was a pre-hearing or other meeting about this and, I'm sorry, I didn't see the -- see it until the sign was up and it seems like there has been things going on maybe. Can somebody clarify what the R-4 zoning designation means to split? Ritter: It just means that it's a residential lot and it's -- the lot size is 8,000 square feet. Wenger: Okay. And how many residences can go on that, please? Ritter: He could put as many that could fit as long as it worked with the road network. So -- but he only chose to split it in half. Wenger: Okay. So, he is choosing to split it in half. So, there will be two lots. One and two. And how many homes could go on each of those lots, either now or in the future, please? Ritter: Well, as of right now, because it's just two lots, it will be one home on each -- unless they want to do an accessory -- a secondary dwelling on one of -- or both of the lots. Wenger: Okay. So, R-4 does not mean that they could have four units per in the future? Ritter: If they came in in the future to subdivide the property after a certain period of time they would have to meet the minimum lot requirements in order to do that, but at this time they have not proposed that. Wenger: Whole separate -- Ritter: It would be a whole different thing and the roadways would look a whole lot different. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 33 of 39 Wenger: Okay. All right. Yeah. That's -- that's fine. And, then, this is the picture I was curious about. I wanted to clarify what I think maybe the HOA president was asking for and maybe he can clarify, but now -- the number at the left side is pulled up, I'm wondering if he is meaning he wants the sidewalks to go around, so that it looks more like the rest of the neighborhood. Like maybe that would be sufficient, so that it's not -- or -- or just a prettier fence. But I think they said they were going to do a prettier fence, so -- okay. Thank you very much. Simison: Thank you. Anybody else that would like to provide testimony on this item at this time? Then would the applicant like to come forward and make any final comments? Semple: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council. Again Ben Semple. So, to address a couple of these. So, yeah, Linda is correct, we are not extending Morello Avenue. It will be just a private driveway. But we do have to meet fire department access requirements. Right now that segment of Morello is about 150 feet long, which is the maximum extent that a fire department would back up. So, because we are extending a driveway into the site we have to build a fire department hammerhead turn around on the site. So, it will be publicly accessible for a turnaround in terms of its in an easement, but it's not an extension of the public roadway, it's still technically on private property. I was talking with my client, also the owner there, and I think we can figure out a way to work with the HOA here by creating a concrete driveway approach at the end of Morello Avenue effectively, because I believe it's rolled curb all through here. So, doing a rolled curb that would cut across the end of Morello right now with a sidewalk on it, so that it would basically be a rolled curb that led up into his property, but there would be a continuous public sidewalk that was within the ACHD right of way, so that if you are walking down Morello you could cross Morello on a sidewalk, rather than just cross through asphalt or someone's private driveway. So, I think that that's something that we could easily accommodate with this plan. And, hopefully, that would kind of make this -- it would close off this end of the street, make it look a little bit more consistent. The fencing along Ustick was permitted by the owner, so it was reviewed by the building department as it is right now. I know that fencing styles is like design, everybody, you know, has their own opinion of what they like. This is what the owner chose and it would be how he continues and closes the -- the current driveway. R-4 zoning here in the future -- I know there was concern about redevelopment. In the future this could -- both of these lots could redevelop and as Linda stated at that point the public street would be extended into this site. Public utility mains would be drug in and there would be a much more impactful development. But for the foreseeable future this is going to be two single family homes for my client and his parents to live on one. I would stand for any additional questions you might have . Simison: Thank you. Council, additional questions for the applicant? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 34 of 39 Cavener: Just a comment, Ben. We don't see you very often and -- Semple: You don't. Maybe more often, though. Cavener: Well, that's -- I -- I'm -- I'm looking forward to that, because I -- I find you bring us these kind of small projects and you really take them on like this is going to be your home and you engage with the neighbors like they are going to be your neighbors and I just don't get often to say appreciate what you do. But truly every time you are before us trying to anticipate what the questions are going to be from the neighbors and work with them to resolve it and, again, maybe that feedback -- we all knew those answers, but I appreciate you coming up and walking it through, so the neighbors here could hear it as well. We don't see that very often. I just want you to know how much I appreciate it. Semple: I appreciate that. Simison: All right. Thank you very much. Semple: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move that we close the public hearing on Item No. 4. Whitlock: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Council, I think this is a pretty straightforward application. Appreciate kind of closing off that access off of Ustick. That helps a lot. I see no areas of concern. Appreciate the applicant responding to the neighbors. So, I'm prepared to make a motion, unless there is any further testimony. Mr. Mayor, considering all applicant, staff and public testimony, I move we approve Item No. 4, Application SHP-2024-0004, include all staff, applicant and public testimony. Strader: Second. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 35 of 39 Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Item SHP-2024-0004. Is there a discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Thank you very much. Have a good night. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 5. Election of City Council Officers and Liaison Assignments Simison: Final item is Item 5, election of City Council officers and liaison assignments. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Just maybe to kick off the discussion, I think that Council President Cavener has done a great job as our leader in the last year and just really appreciate all that he is doing and I -- I would support kind of continuing as we are, if it's okay with everybody else. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: In opposition to the motion -- I would like to nominate -- no. I appreciate it. think both Councilman Cavener and Vice-President Strader have done a good job with the new guys. I'm going to speak for Councilman Whitlock, too. Appreciate their guidance, their -- their care, their -- their tutoring and they have done a good job. I think we are in a good place as a Council, so I wholeheartedly support the continuation of what we have got. Simison: Okay. So, are we going to do a motion officially tonight? Was that the intention of anybody? Cavener: Mr. Mayor, I would look to our legal to tell us what we -- we need to do. Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, you don't have a specific requirement. Generally on the record we have had at least a motion for either retaining the same or nominating the same folks or whatever you want to do, just so it's clear in the record what the intent of the Council was. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 36 of 39 Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Can we -- can we do that in one motion for everybody or do we need to do two separate ones for -- Nary: You can do it together if you wish. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Make a motion that we retain current City Council leadership and liaison assignments as currently constituted. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second and I'm going to interject for discussion on the liaison assignments, because there were some changes that were proposed to the liaison assignments, because they had people that were no longer on City Council. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I did have an opportunity late in the day, apologies, to connect with some of our legal staff and for the vacancies that were made by Council Member Borton and I have -- I have placed my name there and as is always the case if as the year progresses and there is a liaison assignment that a Council Member is itching to be a part of or itching to be less of, we can continue to have that conversation and reevaluate as needed. Simison: Does the motion maker support the adjustment of replacing one name for the other? Taylor: I do. Simison: Second agree? Little Roberts: Yes. Simison: Okay. With that do I have -- someone call the question. Taylor: Mr. Mayor, I call the question. Simison: The question has been called. All in favor of the call the question say aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. The question has been called. All those in favor? Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 37 of 39 Signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the election of officers is official, as well as liaison assignments. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Simison: I will just point out MYAC went through parliamentary procedure, the last two meetings, and so I'm -- I'm just continuing to borrow from the -- yeah, the educational opportunities in that, so we can apply it to these meetings if necessary, so -- Cavener: It will make us all better. ORDINANCES [Action Item] 6. Ordinance No. 25-2071: An ordinance (Black Cat East — H-2024-0047) annexing a parcel of land located in the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 3.62 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: All right. With that we will move on to Item 6, which is Ordinance No. 25- 2071. Ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance related to Black Cat East, H-2024- 0047, annexing a parcel of land located in the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 3.62 acres of such real property from RUT to the I-L zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Was there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? If not, Clerk call the roll. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, motions. Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 38 of 39 Simison: Oh. Sorry. Is there a motion? Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-207. Little Roberts: Second. Overton: Second. Simison: Motion and second and third to approve Ordinance No. 25-2071. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 7. Ordinance No. 25-2072: An ordinance (Pivot Pointe Subdivision — H- 2024-0029) annexing a parcel of land located in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 7.64 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the R-8 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Next item up is Ordinance No. 25-2072. Ask the Clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance related to Pivot Point Subdivision, H-2024-0029, annexing a parcel of land located in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 7.64 acres of such real property from RUT to the R-8 zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Meridian City Council January 28,2025 Page 39 of 39 Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? If not, do I have a motion? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Move that we approve Ordinance No. 25-2072. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 25-2072. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn the meeting. Strader: Second. Simison: Motion and second to adjourn the meeting. All in favor saying by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7.58 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. I l 1 j CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: January 28, 2025 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline Changes to Agenda: Item #2: 3970 E. Overland Road (H-2024-0053) Application(s): Annexation Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1.120 acres of land, zoned R-1 in Ada County, located at 3970 E. Overland Road. History: None Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Mixed Use Regional (MU-RG) Summary of Request: Annexation and zoning of 1.120-acres of land from the R-1 zone in Ada County to the General Retail and Service Commercial District (C-G) zoning district for the construction of a 4,800 square foot multitenant building with one side being used for a restaurant. The current use of the property is residential with several existing buildings on the property. The property consists of one home and two outbuildings. All structures will be removed, and the existing well and septic system will be abandoned as required. The applicant will need to submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) and Design Review (DES) application for review and approval prior to building submittal. The single-family residence to the north and the east will be required to be screened with a twenty-five (25) foot landscape buffer and a six (6) foot privacy fence. Applicant is requesting council waiver to reduce the 25-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the residential properties to the north and east. The property is in probate therefore staff cannot verify the letter received authorizing the landscape buffer reduction. The applicant has the option of requesting permission from the probate court or requesting a waiver to reduce their landscape buffers. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed structure as shown in Section VII.F. Building materials consist of stucco, stone, wood and metal accent. Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and recorded development agreement. The Comprehensive Plan’s goal is to require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Jerrod Wallgren representing the owner ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Lynette Adsitt, Carl Babbitt iv. Written testimony: None v. Key Issue(s): Whether or not Topaz Avenue would extend all the way to Top Golf, will Overland Road be widened to seven (7) lanes and getting onto Overland Road from Topaz Avenue Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. Additional traffic on Topaz Avenue and reduction of the landscape buffer along the residential properties. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. None Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2024-0053, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of January 28, 2025: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2024-0053, as presented during the hearing on January 28, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2024-0053 to the hearing date of January 28, 2025 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #3: Fairview Drive-Through CUP MDA (H-2024-0049) Application(s): Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement Modification Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.76 acres of land, zoned C-G, located at 4300 E. Fairview Avenue, located in a portion of the SW ¼ of the SE ¼, Section 4, T3N, R1E. History: AZ-04-026, CUP-04-035, DA Inst.# 105022224 Mountain West Bank Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Commercial Summary of Request: A Conditional Use Permit for the development of an 1,843 square foot quick-lube oil change facility and drive- through coffee shop within three hundred (300) feet of another drive-through facility and an existing residence; create a new development agreement to establish new hours of operations for the coffee shop to begin service at 5 AM; and approve new concept plan on a 0.76-acre parcel located at 4300 E. Fairview Avenue in the C-G zoning District. Parking: Per UDC 11-3C Restaurants require one (1) parking space for every two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. The total number of parking spaces required is seven (7). The applicant is proposing seventeen (17) parking spaces which exceeds the required number parking spaces for this proposal. The applicant will be required to install wheel stops for the compact stalls or widen the sidewalk to seven (7) feet to prevent vehicles from overhanging on the sidewalk. Site Plan: In reviewing the site plan, staff felt moving the employee parking to the south side of the lot to align with the parking layout for the adjacent bank to the west and help minimize conflicts between vehicles using the coffee shop drive-through and customers accessing the quick-lube oil change facility, while also ensuring sufficient stacking space for the coffee shop drive-through. Staff conditioned the project to either move the parking spaces or provide a site plan amenable to both staff and the applicant. A revised site plan was submitted and accepted by staff. Landscape Buffer: The applicant is no longer requesting a Council waiver to place the trash enclosure into the landscape buffer to match the existing trash enclosure for the adjacent property to the west. Building Elevations: Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed structure. Building materials consist of stucco, stone, wood and metal accent. Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and recorded development agreement. The Comprehensive Plan’s goal is to require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods. Development Agreement Modification: The Applicant is requesting a modification to the existing Development Agreement (DA) Inst. #105022224 amend the starting hours of the coffee shop to 5 am instead of 7 am as it is standard operating hours for all Human Bean coffee shops. The current Development Agreement requires a CUP for all uses and restricts the hours of operation from 7 am to 7 pm. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: vi. In favor: Ethan Mansfield representing the owner vii. In opposition: None viii. Commenting: None ix. Written testimony: Anna Downing – oppose oil change and fast food use due to proximity to residential neighborhood and many other reasons Julie Parker – oppose development because it will be too noisy for the neighborhood as it is scheduled to open at 5 am and last into the evening Sean Thompson – Noisy, hectic operations starting at 5 am and lasting into the evening, auto repair machinery and drive through speakers, air pollution from high traffic and idling vehicles, two businesses with drive through operations can cause potential traffic problems because they gave to share a common parking lot structure and ingress/egress, and the reduction of residential property values Barry Thompson – In agreement with Sean Thompson Sandra G – Oppose the application and would like less going on around where she lives x. Key Issue(s): Site Plan Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: ii. Site layout and use of the property Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: ii. None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. The site plan for the proposed development Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Sean Thompson stating the development needs to meet Ada County’s noise ordinance. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2024-0049, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of January 28, 2025: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2024-0049, as presented during the hearing on January 28, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2024-0049 to the hearing date of \[date\] for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #4: Were Short Plat (SHP-2024-0004) Application(s): SHP Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 3.123 acres of land, zoned R-4, located at 2945 W. Ustick Road. History: Ordinance 577 Annexation Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Summary of Request: Short Plat to subdivide an existing parcel consisting of 3.123 acres of land, into two (2) building lots in the R-4 zoning district. The property was annexed in 1992 as part of the Candlelight Subdivision development. The property was not part of the plat it was only annexed and received R-4 zoning. There is an existing single-family home that will remain on Lot 1 and will be accessed via a shared driveway off N. Morello Avenue. The proposed driveway to the existing home shall be paved with the capability of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. The applicant is not proposing any new fencing as there is fencing along the perimeter of the property. The applicant will enclose the open portion of the fence along Ustick Road where the current driveway is located upon approval. The applicant will also be removing the portion of the fence that is currently blocking the access from Morello Avenue A 25-foot-wide street buffer is required adjacent to Ustick Road, an arterial street. This buffer should be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7. All street buffers with detached sidewalks or multiuse pathways shall be measured from the back of curb. Where ACHD is anticipating future widening of the street, the width of the buffer shall be measured from the ultimate curb location as anticipated by ACHD. Detached sidewalks and multiuse pathways shall have an average minimum separation of greater than four (4) feet to back of curb. As there are overhead power lines along Ustick Road, ensure the proposed trees are applicable for the area. All street landscape buffers shall be on a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement, maintained by the property owner, homeowner's association or business owners' association. The applicant is not in agreement with condition #8 which states “If the landscape buffer has not been installed prior to ACHD widening of Ustick Road and installation of the multiuse pathway, the applicant shall submit a surety for the landscape buffer prior to City Engineer signature.” The applicant states ACHD is in the process of purchasing the right-of-way along the front of the property, so that area will soon be ACHD property. According to the applicant, ACHD’s plan for that frontage includes about a 4’ wide “planter” area that they typically install gravel within (similar to the conditions along Ustick east of the project location). The applicant states the property owner will work with ACHD to determine what has been planned so they can develop the surety number for the future install of the planned materials. Staff recommends that the applicant work with ACHD to enter into an agreement for any landscaping placed within the right-of-way. They Ustic Road widening project has been designed and funded as shown on ACHD’s engineered plans. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number SHP-2024-0004, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of January 28, 2025: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number SHP-2024-0004, as presented during the hearing on January 28, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number SHP-2024-0004 to the hearing date of \[date\] for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) h2 City Council Meeting01/28/2025 Slide 1 h2 Agenda Item Numbers/Order: hoodc, 12/19/2006 Lot 1(PP Lot 3)Lot 2 Driveway Access to Existing Residence Aerial MapFuture Land Use MapZoning Map Zoning MapAerialFLUM family residences.am to 7 pm since the site abuts singlelimited from 5The hours of operation for businesses on this site are Zoning MapAerialFLUM E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision (FP-2024-0020) by David Evans and Associates, Inc., located near the South side of W. Amity Rd., midway between S. Meridian Rd. and S. Linder Rd. STAFF REPORT E T*,- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r A M O HEARING 1/28/2025 DATE: f o Continued rom: 112112025 m saaeo 0 X 8t.pi ision C Q Estaf� Z T � SuWrvisim Q� TO: Mayor& City Council E m FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner �� a € Fa�a. GRHH 208-884-5533 s Fedu _ E AMITY ROAD SUBJECT: Stonehill Crossing No. 1 so hi M9m, f GMH FP-2024-0020 Mies T—q.are �tyLLG Media Base LLG LOCATION: South side of W.Amity Rd.,midway between S. Meridian Rd. & S. Linder Rd. �a4 Gorey Ballon aare�di.i=ia( in the north 1/2 of Section 36, T.3N., Peiminary Pa R.1 W. ®® 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of two(2)building lots on 16.06-acres of land in the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts. This is the first phase of Stonehill Crossing Subdivision. 11. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Bryan Appleby,David Evans and Associates,Inc.—9175 W. Black Eagle Rd., Boise, ID 83709 B. Owner: Kason Wedel, Stonehill Church, Inc.— 1608 N.Meridian Rd.,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant 111. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2023-0041)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The preliminary plat included a condition (i.e.#2.1g)for a local public street to be provided off S. Oak Briar Way between Lots 1 and 2,Block 1 for access to these lots instead of a direct access to the collector street.It was required to extend at a minimum,to the east boundary of Lot 2,Block 1 and to extend to the south with future re-subdivision of Lot 3,Block 1.Based on the City's requirement,ACHD also included conditions(i.e.#10)that required a local street to be constructed between these two lots and extend to the site's east property line. Since Page 1 that time,ACHD has determined they will not allow a local street in this location.After much discussion with ACHD on this matter, Staff requests Council approval of a change to the access in this location to allow a private driveway access via S. Oak Briar Way on Lot 1,Block 1 with a temporary ingress-egress easement to Lot 2,Block 1.When an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of Lot 3,Block 1,the access easement should terminate, and access should be provided via a local public street. For the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase,and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Because there is no change to the number of buildable lots and no common open space in this phase, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat, as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 7/6/23) • — Y 6 Aaauuawsao�n �. HWNi7 TIw�Eois ,p � A I iG F. III �• � I° IpI����...J � ; ��.� ���ppi; �� 1111-1i 711lli ' -JIT j •fir° a 1 lilt �i; 6 ==ado � �$"t�§�� � ;•lif 'I�� 01 i'I s 9I�lI�II� 0 CM ._.;_. �_i 1 I -- „ --- ------- ----- y' ° i o LLI if , , , �•� I 1 A No Page 3 B. Final Plat(dated: 12/13/24) 963 z is _ � a '� !- d� W a A ■ o O e • ■ v i I I � I i 7 � r • ss����E!s �� �e� _[A C7 m F ° 1 I , by �i i RI I + u 1 a o C P v _ C t W G '• - M •v �0 En N n o 11 BI QCI Cr N ■ ,eo-as I c5 I IM A f � n . \ a p $ '$ -'r�' ❑N 0 oR � � a otl un I J r / jF XXX \ �y�.yy.pt C.�."'-, i pcz Via' ,♦ \\ /r/ r d4� ;I�� I 1 I- Oo Lp Al AOTiI i�K••�M '--� e ' � ,'� ��y. ` •e 3.il.iC00N ACVZ I In �✓�I S E a s Page 5 g ek e y e s ID s $ § 'a 2k '3 ; a s i t $ $ Y NMI efill � €�a- s 5 bFa m J 111�10 s- S3�i � �8 6 ©U1 C7 � �g � t � � a; is � ansGeSaiccEccc "sc � , B s �a, L aw m j E a 1-1 i e ads Jill k a p �$k g aSY %a �` g R $ '� fi k = wa Z nl I I _J1L 0 I � , I I I ate- [ -----, 1 II a Cry agg �[l i �•• 's � �' Sal a fl p fJlkmai S t Ana �• `TAau � � � � _ �. � �Ig,� l` A• xsL� _� •, 4 1 .r §§ R a 11 Ell Isl uelQ�y 41 NM 21'i07Y 150.06' � 3 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 12/18/2024) N L j IN ON yy M I 1 9 n 4 1 _ �r Page 7 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [H-2023-0041,Development Agreement Inst. #2024-031550). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years of City Council approval of the preliminary plat(i.e.by March 26,2026) as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or,a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat shown in Section V.B prepared by Idaho Survey Group,LLC, stamped on 12/13/2024 by Cody McCammon, shall be revised as follows: a. Note#5: "Lots shall not be reduced in size without prior approval from the health authority and the City of Meridian." b. Note#7: Include the recorded instrument number of the CC&R's. c. Note #10: "Direct lot access to W. Amity Road is prohibited except for the emergency vehicle access on Lot 1, Block 1 unless otherwise restricted by the Ada County Highway District." d. Note #11: "Direct lot access to S. Oakbriar Way is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian. An edditienal exception is approved for ene two (4-2)permanent driveway accesses for Lot 1, Block 1, as depicted hereon." e. Note #15: Include the recorded instrument number of the City of Meridian water main easement. f. Note #16: Include the recorded instrument number of the City of Meridian sewer main easement. g. Note #17: "A peFpetual eommo temporary ingress/egress easement is hereby reserved across Lot 1,Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2,Block 1 until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2, Block 1, at which time the easement shall cease and the access driveway on Lot 2,Block I shall be removed." h. Include the phase number in the subdivision name. i. Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD temporary easement graphically depicted on Sheet 3. j. Include the CP&F No. on Sheet 1. k. Depict a minimum 20-foot wide street buffer along S.Oakbriar Way,a collector street,and a minimum 25-foot wide street buffer along W.Amity Rd., an arterial street,in a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement labeled as such,with a note that it will be maintained by the property owner, homeowner's association or business owner's association(as applicable) as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.2a. The buffer along W. Amity Rd. shall be measured from the ultimate curb location as anticipated by ACHD. An electronic copy of the revised plat shall be submitted prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 5. The landscape plan shown in Section V.C, dated 12/18/24, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict the right-of-way dedication for the multi-lane roundabout planned at the W. Amity Rd./Oak Briar intersection consistent with the Master Street Map; and the additional right-of-way for W.Amity Rd., as required by ACHD. b. Widen the street buffer along S. Oak Briar Way to 20-feet and the street buffer along W. Amity Rd. to 25-feet and depict landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3. Street buffers shall be measured from the back of curb or the ultimate curb location as anticipated by ACHD where the street is anticipated to be widened. i. Where the buffer is encumbered by easements or other restrictions (i.e. overhead utility line along Amity Rd.),the buffer area shall include a minimum five-foot wide area for planting shrubs and trees per UDC 11-3B-7C.lb; or, Class I trees(i.e. ornamental trees)may be planted if allowed by the utility company. ii. All street buffers are required to be planted with a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative ground cover—shrubs should be added. iii. Lawn and other grasses requiring regular mowing shall comprise no more than 65% percent of the vegetated coverage of the landscape buffer. This maximum area excludes landscaped parkway with trees.All other vegetated coverage shall be mulched and treated as planting area for shrubs or other vegetative cover. Areas along required walls and closed vision fences should generally be reserved for planting beds with a minimum of one(1)shrub per seven(7) lineal feet of frontage. iv. The calculations table should be updated to reflect compliance with the aforementioned standards, including required vs.provided number of trees, percentages and tree classifications (i.e. Class 1,11 or 111). c. Depict the edge of pavement for Amity Rd. on the plan. If the unimproved street right-of- way is 10-feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, the developer shall maintain a ten-foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover per UDC 11-313-7C.5. d. Depict the location of the emergency access driveway via W. Amity Rd. on Lot 1,Block 1 and label it as such. 6. All existing structures that do not comply with the setbacks of the R-4 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-5 shall be removed from the site prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature. 7. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 8. The existing home on Lot 2, Block 1 shall connect to City water and sewer service within 60 days of it becoming available and disconnect from private service as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. 9. The address of the existing home on Lot 2, Block 1 shall change with recordation of the subdivision. 10. The ingress-egress easement depicted on Lot 1,Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2,Block 1 shall be temporary until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of the adjacent property; at such time, the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 via Lot 1 shall be removed. Page 9 11. Underground pressurized irrigation water shall be provided to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 with development of the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 12. A sign shall be erected at the terminus of the collector stub street(S.Oak Briar Way)that states the street will be extended and widened in the future as required by ACHD. 13. All development shall comply with the dimensional standards for the R-4 or R-8 zoning district, as applicable, listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-5 and 11-2A-6,respectively. 14. The final plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed church on Lot 1,Block 1 as set forth in the Development Agreement. 15. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation I \ A \ / I ` /d/ ``\• \ d`� /�Q```\ �4 \ \`\lye: Al I Ia I RUN111 1 11 •Ri • L ------- Jo o° v - im�-M—�: 0 1 ■i O 1 cc STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF • STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF Privat e Dri v e w a y o � Wlll cn ,. . . SP — - P.�Jf rFlo • 4 4! • `-` 4k, Ask, .,' + ��l,,, ��j,day �� �� T`•K�t?� - - I • ; Y A AL 40 Err y � r M - 1�, L•k- x� • • � M y F F / + � OR - I + • I JL IL S m op Ira PA fAd ur - Z4f4fA W_ ZZZJ"W4111ZZZZ%O I I I • C - • I ' • C i \ I ♦ r X \ ` ♦ \ ♦ /d/ j/s `. a ,ay oil ♦ I J01J�JJ J , �IFO 0 � ! //JVJr! J L � 101 v _ cc I ■— O STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF • STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF L V Private Driveway r cn dq% -- �J1 A . �• s r i'.` ' l / or �::."r A ., • i .v ilI�W r 40 r r . �� � r xz •+ 'ti 5 IPF - � fpp PF - - ' ir op r F: irr VAO Wr IIIAF W - ` IL60 _ • • I VAO • #+� � -.� ?4/14/ZZZ4 � i \ 41 AL ♦♦ 41 / \ // / a 00 L >' IOI � I I ■— O STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF • STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF -� Private Driveway cn F KAO Ak or g IV I a f 1 � dr Op � r PP #� / ## dip # 41r JFF � F* ice# • • o O� , " .I#rF � • orjAFF OVA' �F WI VZZZ4W40OZ6 Of �ZZZZ11 \ i �d \ `♦ , • . IOI � v ox IX 40 LM � I I ■— O STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF • STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF STAFF -� Private Driveway o � I r� Cn Alf op OVA 'AOPZA# 40 tom . POP � d • • O� / r OR - / jow 00.6 ## ##### • • WI #+r Current Condition # 10 wording : The in g ress - e g ress easement depicted on Lot 1 , Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2 , Block 1 shall be temporary until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of the adjacent property ; at such time , the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 via Lot 1 shall be removed . Pro p osed Condition # 10 rewording i lighted additions ) : The i ngress - egress easement depi cted o n L ot 1 , Blo ck 1 fo r the benefit of Lot 2 , Block 1 shall be temporary until such time as an al ternate acc ess is availa ble for Lot 2 with deve lop ment of the adjacent property to the east of Lot 2 , Block 1 and Lot 2 , Block 1 is redeve loped ( e . g . , residence is torn down and replaced by a new single -family residency , lot is further subdivided , eta ` ; at such time , the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 via L0t 1 shall e remove d . W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing continued from January 14, 2025 for 3970 E. Overland Rd. (H- 2024-0053) by Dominic Pera, JGT Architecture, located at 3970 E. Overland Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0053 A. Request: Annexation and Zoning of 1.120 acres of land from the R-1 zone in Ada County to the General Retail and Service Commercial District (C-G) zoning district for the construction of a 4,950 sq. ft. multi-tenant building with one side being used for a restaurant. i i PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET a DATE: January 28, 2025 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 2 PROJECT NAME: 3970 E. Overland Rd. (H-2024-0053) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name E 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CjfE IDIAN DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/14/2025 legend DATE: � Project Location 90 TO: Mayor& City Council Area of Impact = City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O analysis fi 208-884-5533 - -------- Iritter@merifiancity.org APPLICANT: Dominic Pera,JGT Architecture If SUBJECT: H-2024-0053 3970 E. Overland Road-AZ LOCATION: 3970 E. Overland Road, located in a ;; o portion of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 16,Township 3N,Range 1E, parcel: S 1116347191 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation and zoning of 1.120-acres of land from the R-1 zone in Ada County to the General Retail and Service Commercial District(C-G)zoning district to construct a 4,800 square foot multi-tenant building with a portion being used for a restaurant. B. Issues/Waivers • Applicant is requesting a reduction of the 25-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the residential properties to the north and east. Property is in probate therefore staff cannot verify the letter received authorizing the landscape buffer reduction. The applicant is seeking a Council waiver to reduce the required landscape buffer as allowed under the UDC. C. Recommendation Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation per the conditions of approval included in Section IV in accord accordance with Findings in Section V. Commission: Approval D. Decision City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Commercial - Existing Zoning R-1 Ada County VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning General Retail and Service Commercial District(C-G) Adopted FLUM Designation Mixed-Use Regional(MU-RG) VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Mixed-Use Regional(MU-RG) Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 9/24/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 7/23/2024 Site posting date 11/15/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IVY • Comments Received Yes/Staff Report - • Commission Action No - Required • Access Topaz Avenue via E. Overland Road - • Traffic Level of Service Overland Road—Better than"E" - ITD Comments Received Yes/Email stating no comments for this project IV.G Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Sewer main is available in Topaz Ave • Impacts or Concerns See plat conditions Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Water available at the site • Impacts or Concerns • Applicant will be required to extend water main down Topaz Ave.to their North boundary. • Engineer to verify if there is a well onsite.If a well is located on the site it must be abandoned per regulatory requirements and proof of abandonment must be provided to the City. • Water meter should come off the line in Topaz Avenue. Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. 3970 E. Overland Rd.H-2024-0053(copy this link into a separate browser). City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S1116347191 Date Retrieved:2024/10/25 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: Surrounding Area AIMI 94 215 18% Vot city 1& ® City Limits 1,713 1,008. ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:9.9% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 41% 32% 21% Multi-family 59 47% ® Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 500 1000 1500 ■ Single-family ® Multi-family See Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic COUI)t is based on Vehicles per hour{VPH} Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service Overland Road 208-feet Principal Arterial 927 Better than °E" Topaz Avenue 162-feet Collector hl1A VA x Acceptable level of service for a five-lane principal arterial is "E" (1,780 VPH)_ x Acceptable level of service for a two-lane collector is 'D" (425 VPH). Notes: See 0. Figure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService . ■ Ready Marginal Caution o�y� vat �ae� F�t� o\`ce �a a��'•� .`o� �a\� �i\�e �a\� 00 011 o0 Qa Q- Notes: See Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The Future Land Use Map(FLUM)designates the area proposed to be annexed as "Mixed-Use Regional,"which is intended to encourage a balanced blend of employment opportunities,retail, residential dwellings, and public uses,particularly in areas near major arterial intersections. This designation supports a diverse and integrated community where residents can live,work, and shop without needing to travel far. The applicant is proposing a 4,800 square foot multi-tenant building with a restaurant. This site is part of a larger Mixed-use Regional area,and the developable area is less than an acre therefore, staff has not provided a full analysis on how the project meets the design concepts of the plan. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History Located within Ada County and zoned Rl Physical Features Within the floodplain Acreage 1.21 acres B. History Located within Ada County and zoned R1. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The current use of the property is residential with several existing buildings on the property. The property consists of one home and two outbuildings. All structures will be removed, and the existing well and septic system will be abandoned as required. The applicant will need to submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Design Review (DES) application for review and approval prior to building submittal. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The proposed use "restaurant"is a principally permitted use in the C-G zoning district. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposal will be required to meet the dimensional standards for setbacks,parking requirements, maximum building height, landscape buffers and landscape requirements and for the C-G zoning district. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The proposal shall meet the requirement of the specific use standards for a restaurant per UDC 11-4-3-49.At a minimum, one (1)parking space shall be provided for every two hundred fifty(250)square feet of gross floor area. Upon any change of use for an existing building or tenant space, a detailed parking plan shall be submitted that identifies the available parking for the overall site that complies with the requirements of this title. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Existing structure and Site Design Standards(Comp Plan 3.07.02A, Comp Plan 5.01.02D UDC 11-3A-19): Require pedestrian circulation plans to ensure safety and convenient access across large commercial and mixed-use developments. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods. Buildings shall be designed in accord with the "City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual." Per UDC 11-3A-19 pedestrian walkways shall provide a continuous walkway that is a minimum of five(5)feet in width from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance(s)for nonresidential uses. The internal pedestrian walkway shall be distinguished from the vehicular driving surfaces through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets Per UDC 11-3B-8,the intent of these requirements is to ensure the long term and consistent maintenance of landscape buffers along streets that improve the visual quality of the streetscape,unify diverse architecture,and carry out the comprehensive plan policies related to promoting attractive street(s)and street beautification. The applicant is proposing water conserving design to reduce the required buffer along Overland Road by fifty(50%)percent as allowed per UDC 11-3B-50. ii. Parking lot landscaping Per UDC 11-3B-8,the purpose of perimeter and internal parking lot landscaping is to soften and mitigate the visual and heat island effect of a large expanse of asphalt in parking lots, and to improve the safety and comfort of pedestrians. The applicant needs to add an additional landscape island along the north side of the building as no linear grouping of parking spaces shall exceed twelve(12) in a row, without an internal planter island. The planter island shall run the length of the parking space and may be reduced by two (2)feet to allow for improved vehicular maneuvering. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses Per UDC 11-3B-9, a landscape buffer is required in the C-N, C-C, C-G,L-O, M-E,H-E, and I-L districts on any parcel sharing a contiguous lot line with a residential land use. The landscape buffer is required in the I-H district on any property sharing a contiguous lot line with a nonindustrial use. The single-family residence to the north and the east will be required to be screened with a twenty-five(25)foot landscape buffer and a six(6)foot privacy fence. The applicant is requesting a reduction of the 25 foot landscape buffer adjacent to the residential properties to the north and east. The property is currently in probate therefore staff cannot verify the letter received authorizing the landscape buffer reduction. The applicant has the option of requesting permission from the probate court or requesting a waiver to reduce their landscape buffers. The applicant is requesting a Council waiver to reduce the landscape buffer to the residential use down to fifteen (15)feet. iv. Tree preservation The applicant will be required to submit tree protection and mitigation plans to City Arborist. Per UDC 11-3B-10, the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. v. Storm integration An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis Per UDC 11-3C commercial buildings require one(1)parking space for every two hundred(250)square feet of gross floor area for restaurants. The total number of parking spaces required is nineteen (19). The applicant is proposing thirty-seven (37) parking spaces which exceeds the required number parking spaces for this proposal. NOTE: The parking for the site will be reduced by one stall due to the requirement for the applicant to provide another planter island along the north side of the building as mentioned above. ii. Bicycle parking analysis Per UDC 11-3C-6.G One (1) bicycle parking space shall be provided for every twenty- five(25)proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, except for single-family residences, two-family duplexes, and townhouses. Based on the thirty-seven (37)parking spaces provided, a total of two (2) bicycle parking spaces is required. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan 5.01.02D, Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed structure as shown in Section VII.F. Building materials consist of stucco, stone, wood and metal accent. Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and recorded development agreement. The Comprehensive Plan's goal is to require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods. 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): The applicant is proposing to install a six(6)foot high vinyl fence along the northern property line. The applicant will need to provide fencing on the residential portion on the east side of the property. Fencing shall comply with the requirements outlined in UDC H- 3A-7. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan 6.01.02C, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access to the property is from S. Topez Avenue via E. Overland Road in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. The applicant shall be required to grant cross-access/ingress-egress to adjoining properties by a recorded easement per UDC 11-3A-3A.2. NOTE: The property to the east was only required to provide cross access if the existing storage yard is ever converted to parking in the future. 2. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. The applicant is proposing sidewalks along the west side of the property along S. Topez Avenue. F. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided with this development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11- 3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.03A, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. All utilities are available to the site. Water main,fire hydrant and water service require a twenty foot(20) wide easement that extends ten (10)feet past the end of main, hydrant, or water meter. No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. Comprehensive Plan policy 3.03.03G require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and sewer utilities. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan and conceptual building elevations included in Section IV and the provisions contained herein. b. Direct access to E. Overland Road is prohibited. c. Provide a 25-foot landscape buffer to the north and east along the north side of the property along with a six(6) foot privacy fence to block headlines from the residential property unless waived by Council. d. The applicant shall be required to grant cross-access/ingress-egress to adjoining property to the east by a recorded easement. A copy of the easement shall be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance application. e. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Design Review application shall be submitted and approved for the proposed commercial building prior to submittal of a building permit application. The design of the site and structures shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-49; the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. f. Future development of the site shall comply with the ordinances in effect at the time of development. g. Development of the subject property shall comply with the C -G standards listed in UDC 11-2B- 3. The only uses allowed on the subject property are as follows: City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions • Restaurant-excluding drive-through • Flex Space; • Retail Sales; • Professional and personal service; and • Office. h. Business hours of operation within the C-G District shall be limited from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. when the property abuts a residential use or district. B. Meridian Public Works See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridianciN.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=365356&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit Y C. Meridian Park's Department 1. Submit tree protection and mitigation plans to City Arborist. D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancioy.orkIWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=365356&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit Y- E. Ada County Development See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=365356&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit Y F. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancioy.ory WWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=365356&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit Y G. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=365356&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit Y V. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; Commission finds annexation of the subject site with C-G zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Mixed-Used Regional FLUM designationfor this property, if the Applicant complies with the provisions in Section IV. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; Commission finds the layout proposed will be consistent with the purpose statement of the commercial district in that business opportunities provided consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; Commission finds that the map amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and Commission finds that the map amendment will not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City if the property is developed in accord with the provisions in Section IV. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation per the conditions of approval included in Section IV in accord accordance with Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5, 2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject annexation and zoning requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Jerrod Wall rg en representing the owner b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Lynette Adsitt, Carl Babbitt d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) public testimon: a. Whether or not Topaz Avenue would extend all the way to Top Golf,will Overland Road be widened to seven(7)lanes and getting onto Overland Road from Topaz Avenue 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Additional traffic on Topaz Avenue and reduction of the landscape buffer along the residential properties. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action ' I � ct Location -• of •• ® Q f Analysis 84 ` III ,,.,,�:. A. r. yMA, d w_ - • A OVERLAND _ - - ' VL J. # W A- I iLUJe j� h Eli Legend Project Location ll .°' ��� ��i�i arrn►j':C WOMENArea of Impact ■ ■ �nuar•o■0��. Analysis ♦�a,mu ■ rid ��'/,Iflflfl r...- ...w a ♦ � �: �IJill►# ►/III■IIIIII��nI>��Inu■■rni Ia► �,, 84 '�ga■: �lIIIIIIIIII. �. „�I;�:1�1�1'1 _ � 1 : r♦ �'�;E,:� .IIIIIIIIIII: �Ill....;��i�� ..■..•iu1 �� ,lnnurm�mf�■111[IIIIII�• - ����� ■■■■■■ '■ JIIIIumu��1►■ IIIIIIIII��s�•■■� I• ■■■■■■ �■ ■� •*p ■ ■ ■ ■ �� ■■■■■/ ■ �iiiii:w■ 'i i rrra �� ��il � Albs 11111f � ���■ i 1111I�Il�ru�f=P`:l��li ■ .■ ROO ■■ nP■ •a'^_�It r1i1 ONE /1■ 1►arrr n �� �`I rarrr + gnu nr �„■:. ri���,.. ,��...,,� a+ti'vr►�pQ♦ yil��nuur�■■a����' � -__-' uI Ii1♦��.A-�Q�j`- r■r::iiiia'�■:Ilr��� --- r ■ill■i Irr �i■ �ti 1■■ l. _ __-ri.nI1111 �o®_ `l■IIIIII JrsnallrllrB f��Iii� ♦�♦i_--"�141rIrr4rnI"'MS W -■ - rrr UIq! `J�uu�A■ �■■■■■■■■■■: lrt1111! ��OF ■eaual■an■r„��1 ■■r4rrl� --■� "I._ u■:r!■■ -�■■tom■♦lf■■ ll w J -♦iII Hf l�- ry oranrr rills Ir► +�� � {�■■tl ■ ■■loll a �U.■Fli. ��ll1i�tart �� �--�� r r o �r ■. Lu ♦ ! r■ y _a(,T rrq=: ♦i J �i■■:■rr�tt 111 si�J1 �y ij ♦�y._��■ � tar rrr :�� .+111�r+.�,��� 1N551an5mn ■� ��� i�rd► ��+� ■ ar *err!Q =_hna l�o�■:. �■u��o r'� ��■V •I>♦ .�w� � ♦ ♦ •rr Gi rr.. �i W i#Ihnmu wfi C i. r;ter/i ri r�r� � .r���:r�\♦ p0x/lry = ■3 — 11 « s .�/����� �► rr a.■... a�■.- ra■ • .�► �i'��I�:■:n iNgl H�.:�.��■■■ r♦��r�.■..�►� M........�...=`��a- -err Srfr���r, � — r LegendJWjProject Location Area of Impact **�i�■ R � iiiii,� ■ C I.a�r■s■f��i■�ir�.�:■■ LLI 0 Analysis 111►r I//111■1■111��uar ianal..■ap/tY♦ f !r �■ wl:wi r ,IIIIIIII���� 111..1i''I�II ■■■�' .rllnmlmn,>r■Illlllllll�� - �■■ Jlllu■nlilllr•■ IIIIIIIIIR�■��■■� �■■■■/ ■ ���rr►��■■■■■■Ar iL ram: ■� ill 11�* 111 11111�rin■I■��ri 11 1�I+.iZ::Cr► � ` OYERL--AND • � •,�_�.II-rll�-n:��/..t■i■■i � :..r..♦�� -►fir#1 ■u■■.■■.0 lliarr.4 I■■.■ul■.. trlr■ - Q O i1�r�millimomp nl�sj nm No fir-Fr i W 11 ./■■m■1■rn�"Iaf11■■1 �1♦1♦�� ■w {tfllilllsaw N!\41 ■no■ -eu■r1■■■n■ 4n■■■ nlal■r■><rfw IIIIl1 Ji ■■■�■■ --�-��-� •:� I■�• �►r�/i �+f■■rtla11■rl■r■a■r.�- =Irlkll y +nxaw ti ■■■i■r i� .■■ �■ �■. 111 ♦ ♦ �� (■r■rannrrr rrr■�� .J •�:-��■ rr '�J - �_�.1 �.■rral + 15■5 14 15 5 115 11_ -�w_�- i�■d. ♦r+�■1■■■-r■• 1 =Innl11111 ��: a�■R�-o V iK� pN ■��� ��� •�+G:■ - Ilul�unm n�lrl!►C` '- �'■■ l:\r Iro xNr,N 1=77kk� ON ■��■NO ME .-�.tl �lvgl -. �if�■■■ "aLegend /" •1 . 1 � � � Iaarlr--..■ Project Location No ME Area of Impact ■■ . irl�■nn+ Via■.2 .: 'T::" City Limits _ fillPlanned Parcels ►■ I►%Allrlillllll��111 �in11■■rn.�Ia► Analysis 84 ' .��. .r9�": �IIII���I��;1��—����■Iwll'I ....■aiul �� �■nllnnnrmll■Illlllllll�� � 0 III�:���■■■■■ '■ Jllllu■u1111►■ IIIIIIIIIR�s��s■■ ��� ��� ■C�" �� id Albs 111 11111f m■�■��1 ■��� �I�xal■� � 1 1111[�,�y Illruqu�ai:=���li loll OYERL-AND • � ���.l-�illl-n��ll�t■�■■1 "�♦■1�•�■■ >! � � r-liiio m�nnu ul f \fir r—r■r i/�s,_�i��r,l) '�IL ■.�.��,■ ■ IIIIEIIIIIIIIII� III ,■ ■a■�-�• �■■ . ��illununlllal.• / .urr�/��-'it#1 �y1■iiriiiiiii:r �ijjf• � _Ii��■r _ ,�■...■. ♦• gnu nr .. , � �liri • iulf Q ��.• '�i1��nuur:■lar�•,t _ nr 1+ 1�■::■■■■n�::�l■r f r NIIIII illllll ■ ��ra�/ / ■■■. .��i- -■■11{IIIIkIWlkll t■ ,',•■� i ':�.r'ta■ ■■�-�� LU � ■nnumi■„��1 !��♦+r� ••�111■rlfRrllffltli}�/� J� ■ ■■■ O '-C IEi1�:�"j nnn■■ ■rlllr■■*r: II'JM�i��i ■■■sr s■■ .■•�j:.��■It► �i�,il�'�'.' ��*rr■rrallorrr■�l■�r �>.V' Ilnnl■p+�+ellf■~iry�. ��.■■EN ,J 111 •�til+�r� �.;.■r..r,,l■ .••��Ia ==�a=: .. ,.:r � � 15t55U115 5 115 11_:::��� �I rd►vb%�`► ��a�■a■nnr��Ir�:W mI1�**=IimTii"��: it :��� !�� �� ►���r�a':11'::!` ■■Iflluuunn nurl U,N R 5. Map Notes Nearby Recent Preliminary Plats(2018+) H-2016-0112 H-2017-0104 Nearby Recent Conditional Use Permits(2018+) H-2020-0123 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits h ' y Ida� - --4•-r— !'x 4 3 k� a wti„ r t• yy _ =s B. Subject Site Photos 11 City of MeridianDepartment Re 11Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S1116347191 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 29 32nd Percentile Criteria Description k Location Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 5CO ft. from parcel GREEN Floodplain Within 100 yr floodplain & < 2 acres RED Emergency Services Fire Response time e 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLOIV Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) ParkWalkability No park within walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Site Plan (date: 9/30/2024) .A. — r L I I u � a w vrwaoseo swLoiroc- ••� � � "OD M.FT. zffz8 o z o 1 t, o�Re.u�o Aare ANX-1.0 SITE VLAN VLAN �v. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Building Elevations(date: 9/30/2024) 'I I w MT OLL m 6fc m M ¢��s M m25 :g � II I F I � I I I � I I � I I I I I 1 _ I f I I a Y #IEIM1 MULTI-TF, euIILYING r jgt architecture OR VUONG NGUYEN L �® TOU E OVULMU 190M.WREMN.10 M642 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map PORTSIDE LAND SURVEYING , LLC EXHIBIT A ANNEXATION I-MAL DESCRIPTION A paroelof land that Includes Ada County Highway District rlght•of•way,io be annexed into the Ctty of Meridldft,said parcel being located 4n a panlan of the Southeast Quarter of the southwest QUO rter of Section 16,Township 3 t+Iorth,Range 1 EaSt,Eloise M e rdiari,said area of I and being more pa rticuia rly descrlbed as follows; Commneing at a found brass cap monument at the South Quarter corner of sabd Sectlon 16,the True Point of 9egiriniog; thence along the Sotith line ofsald Section 16,North 89'15'33"west a dlstance of 2n.71 feet tc a paint of i nteneetion of the cer tefline of 5.Topaz Avenue a nd said South I irne; Them along said centerline,North W05'20"West a distance of 208,50feet. Thence South 89%2'37"East a distance of n-00 feet to the Southwest comer of tot 17,clock 1, Plat of Jewel Subdivision,Book 34r 2056,records of Ada County; Thence along sa id Lot I Inc,South 89'12'37"East a dicta nce of 209.71 feet to a po int an the East line Of Rol ling H III 5ubdh+isi0 n, Book 4$r 1202,records of Ada County; Thence along sald East Ilfie South W05'30 r East a dicta nre of 160.70 feet to a point on the North right-of-way line of East ovedand Road; Thence 5oadh W05'30"East a dlsta nee of 48.00 feet to the True Paint of Begifinl rkg- Said par"I containing 1.120 acres W,793 Sq.Ft.,more or iess.) End pescriptlon Project No.24-13i# Prepared August 28,2024 X]`" iS- \ T ri, 1272 3626 W. Hdf Rd.$o!#,1D 8370-1 (208)184-666 12gr xxet2dcsLro-ey.e'urs City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits HXMI-RIT B ANNEXA 77ON MAP A PARCEL OF LAND INCLUMG ACHD RIGIHT—CEF—WAY. SAID PARCEL BEING LWA7ED IN 7TIE SE 714 OF THE SW 114 OF SEC770N 16 ro*NSa4IP 3 NORTH, RANGE I EAST, 80NSE MERILYAN, ADA C UAII Y, WAHO + LOT 17, BLOCK 1 S 7237-F 2J3.71' SCALE' 1 _SHEET �7 8 1/2 X 11 SHEEP ONLY 2 't a LEGEND w PARCEL LINE LIE } O � m BECKON UNE ACREEUENT AREA $ " , I? RIGHT—OF—WAY LWC zm --------- DWENSIOaN IJM o FUMV BRAS$ CAP ray to # 5yW-REBAR, TO BE SET M 52133'02 w N &9't�'30' w p FWJV9 516'RERAR 22,25' 0.77' CALCULATED POINT „y P.O.B. POWT OF BEGNNRWG OF OESCRIPPON 5 89'2- 04' w i44.74' w DoRrrErr I � I09$.92' — — �233,T7' _ L f 70 N 99 W33" w 1332-53' E. � T14 CORNER tl P.0.B "y Oft 1 Cyr I M LAW &N EY T _ ANNEXA77ON AREA 3626 W HILL ROAD, BOISE, ID 63703 PHOW (2W 454-6666 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits 129Ta � 4 ro� Mall Annexation parcel closure 18128J2024 Scale" 1 inch=O feet File; Tray[1.1.1201 Acm(45793 5q.F&Gn.Cb6UY:s85-4440r 6A1 R(1.1734441,P9ernemr4M M. 61 n89.1533k 2M.71 02 n00.0520w 20&9 as"V.17370 25 dl sl14.1237e 20&71 "e06A"1"' City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES & DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days.Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development, government, and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2<5.0; R-4<2.0; R-8< 1.0; R-15 <0.5; R-40<0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan(e.g.pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources, including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F.Letter A represents free flow conditions, and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D, stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians, nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation COUNCIL HEARING PRESENTATION FOR °' 20 E co 0 0 DONG KHANH MULTI —TENANT BUILDING � � a U JANUARY 28 , 2025 °' � a a9 N Co co CD STAMP Pi ENO 0 all av Ai br M „ � t (D Z o J Z 00 W E Z O z w " (Do ~ Z H Oz � o w w z o m • REQUESTING ANNEXATION AS C =G ZONE • REQUESTING WAIVER ON REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER FROM 25 DOWN TO 15 FT. ON NORTH BOUNDARY is PROPOSED 4, 900 S . F . BUILDING DRAWN BY DATE: JPW 7 1/27/25 • 39200 S . F . FOR VIETNAMESE RESTAURANT - BALANCE OF BUILDING FOR FUTURECHECK JOB NO.: TENANT COVER ANX- 1 . 0 i ram+ REVISIONS: rt 49 moat w ,�� • - �` FUTURE CROSS ACCESS CONNECTIVITY J Q H Z 00�15 FT. LANSCAPE BUFFER25'- 0" O ` 0 V � w �� N 9 $ VLL co E � I - - -U - � O •� L • � I dd > N c� { N � Lo co C� O ■ � N N ' • ADA PARKING STALLS GARBAGE TRUCK TURNING ROUTE FUT U RE 9'-o,. CROSS CCESS ' CON N ECTIVITY 0 STAMP 8 8 \W O 10 FT. LANDSCAPE BUFFE PATIO PROPOSED BUILDING ao 49603 SQ. FT. 3 - N C`7 _ z °° SIDEWALK -.-TRASH0 - BIKE RACK. , 'ENCLOSURE J Z ® ® z 0_ _ , m uj w SIDEWALK Lu � Q z ih Q Ow U � o `� Z O z Q Q () w LL �I''� O J � w `J 8_0o � z w o LINE OF ACHD R.O.W. DEDICATION - NEW PROPERTY LINE O Q LANDSCAPING, RE: LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SPECIFICS Lu NEW SIDEWALK TO t EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDAR 5 CONNECT FROM -- �J W EXISTING SIDEWALK � • ON OVERLAND --- - - z o OVERLAND ROAD RTH • PREVIOUS HEARING COUNCIL EXPRESSED CONCERNS OVER PIECEMEAL DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE CONNECTIVITY DRAWN BY DATE: NEW SITE PLAN PROVIDES FORMAL ACCESS POINT TO THE NORTH JPW 1,27,25 • HE KED: JOB NO.: PRESENTATION WILL ILLUSTRATE EXISTING CONTEXT AND POSSIBLE IDEAS FOR FUTURE JPW 2454 DEVLOPMENT SITE PLAN ANX-2 .0 SHEET OF • � 1 1 I • • NONNI on ■■■I ■■■■I on N■■■I ■■■■I on WA NONNI 1 111111 11111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 , 1 nnn' - _ -- ��nnnnnnnnn- _—=ilnnnnmm�n ___ nnnnnnnnm_ _=nnnnnnnnni _ nnnnnnnnn__ ilnnnnn nni � �i� _ _ � �" I=��- , i i�i .=�r�=�r�' � ���i�=�r�',_ i_- �.sue_ � • IMAN 11 1 � � • 1 1 P I NA PA 1 p1m. _ _ -ate__�• � �i�_ \ ��. �_� .�, 1 �V _ • • • i ii 1 I I ■■■■■■■■ _ I JI 11 1 T. 1 1 • • � 1 REVISIONS: r O f ' 1 N �- V E : r EAGLE VIEW LANDING 0-0 Em 1992 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH m m 0 � r BOISEmc\j r r• r- "� � ■ = THESE IMAGES ILLUSTRATE HOW THE AREA HAS IN co o 0) coo DEVELOPED IN THE LAST 30 YEARS = " - EXISTING COUNTY RURAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES � aJA HAVE BECOME SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. --~"' OVERLAND D. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT HAS OCCURED DUE TO THE AQUISITION OF LARGE ACERAGE FARM LAND WHICH ALLOWED THOSE DEVELOPMENTS TO STAMP ESTABLISH A COHESIVE WHOLE WITH PLANNED ROADS, ELDORADO SIVERSTONE INFRASTRUCTURE AND USE STRATIFICATION CORPORATE PAR ' r CORPORATE PARK �� `' THAT COHESIVENESS IS MORE DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE ON A COLLECTION OF SMALLER PARCELS. NORTH t • 0-4 ` -` ' ■ +ILA ."'' 1 - - - _ • •t a,■ - - - - - - r __.■ r - z W '44 H • ww. is LOW Z UJ • Lu41 EAGLE VIEW LANDING wo- 1 r t1 I e F Z O Z Q LLJ ti • • - lRyl—..--.� .fir - � r~1ti * •Y IF . � � Z JBOI E J ■ f r' 1 t ; •1 t• I w w , 1 1 Z p - - a - 2025 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WWI �� r , .'■' ,' '`P .• • - r'l ' a1- I :r •I+'I'+; �_Z"r.i .i„w, .�, . .r`"`'�! ,. .. . , . • r f. . ' : O _E_RLAN D RD z _ ___ . _ - - '� V a•: .r y Yr.f. • 7 • rfA F,- fas 1 k' r . ►+ » , ' f DRAWN BY DATE: DORADO "' �•,ti . -�'EL �,1 JPW 1/27/25 " .:,. r .~ SIVERSTON`E ■. HE KED: JOB N .. ' CORPORATE PARK - ' JPW 2454 • - ' ' CORPORATE PARK 1 _ -•: .,may J 1 1 ._. • ' HISTORICAL AERIAL � • A r t . *:. A N X-4 .0 SHEET OF REVISIONS: I _ __ _ �/ 'F J • W , ' u r 1� •' ■ _ fJ l I / EF-T7 — _ 006, rMir F_ Lo N co co ir I• I Ln 00 . _ !— ■ co ON - � • ' L Ll J 1 -L'IT % _ .. 1 •F 'll 3,• � I I � r s i _ R l n• — - r •, r _ � r- % STAMP in. ~ — e ■n 1 • _ •'•' .� ZAMZOW'S ; ' •' Ir iL l-i • r I 1r� 11 — { ■ ! • r __ 1 1~ r IDAHO ROOFING. ` a . L �f ' ti ' 1 ' f �r _ = CONTRACTORS �- 1 ti_ s- I s _ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ' �f I �lYr:! Ra FED L 'Y� J� 1 I ' I ' • 1 . 1 R • 1 — LA- FJ I I _ _• r N I 1 r r I I I S Lut J--� '� Q II � �■' ' •Irr I I I ' • z o J. I J j Lu r , ' r I I ti _ 5 _ c L I ut izr ui Di _ram - • ' }% — . vi F T] (D •, ti 1 tiL - J x L d- r _ I� ' •r ti L Y til. I z Q - 0 z J � < > � w CURRENT CITY LIMITS MAP o • ENCLAVED AREA CONSISTS OF 49 PARCELS RANGING FROM 1 /2 TO 4 ACRES IN w w SIZE z m PREVIOUSLY 3 PARCELS ALONG OVERLAND IN THIS ENCLAVE HAVE BEEN ~ APPROVED FOR ANNEXATION 1 . ZAMZOWS - 3 PARCELS TOTALING 2.71 ACRES 2. 3840 E. OVERLAND R-2 ZONING 0.91 ACRES 3. IDAHO ROOFING CONTRACTORS - 0.89 ACRES • THIS PROPOSED SITE ALONG OVERLAND IS APPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL/ DRAWN BY DATE: JPW 1/27/25 RESTAURANT USE. HE KED: JOB N JPW 2454 CITY LIMITS MAP A N X-4 . 1 SHEET OF • • � ■ � . .10 , ommer , ■ � �� ■ ci00or 10 ■ ■� ■ • ■ �` � �� Rites �� �= � � � � ` �� � . ■ . "Nam ■� - - IL c -'el. 'I f - -• L- &INNER RINI ■ sonlow me P4,NIS ■■ A 01 ensid! - IBM 2 m son Resi enti-a' 'l 0 OEM AV I won MEMO OEM ap OMEN son MU - RG lun, Boom 4L ■ a■■a■■ ■■■■■ ■„ ■ nsit mm son M esi e i I son I.Fj mien — _ • • mass ,� �Ir 1� ■ ■�■ � � ■� ► � ���fmom� ■a �aaa■■■� � � � ■�■■��■■■loss gar MEN Ulmmm _ - ■ 11�� • ISM oil MOM y . ■ i r . I • I I • . • i REVISIONS: 1 KI MAP BELOW SHOWS POSSIBLE FUTURE ROADWAYCONNECTIONS : Ago ACHD HAS NO PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS UNTIL 2036 FOR WIDENING OVERLAND _ • CITY HAS REQUESTED POTENTIAL FUTURE EXTENSION OF VIEW CIRCLE FROM TOPAZ . . . . . . TO SIGNAL AT OVERLAND AND MOVADO s ' r + �� - -°- '` ` (D 00 • OPPORTUNITY FOR FUTURE CONNECTION FROM ROLLING HILLS TO FLAT IRON LN r E be o L � a) LO N- EAGLE VIEW LANDING P `� � jwI CO ■ Ln 00 does- FEAT REN APARTMENTS IRpN •� • - - LN. STAM P dp CURRENTLY lop ' - RESTRICTED _ ACCESS, POSSIBLE ■ FUTURE ACCESS _ ONCE AREA RE- v BOISEL7. ` DEVELOPS i N s • � Q _ Z 00 p — W T Z R J Q O ■ FUTURE VIE D z — H - - —� — _W C►RCLE EXTENSIONm w o � AI i =, , w T - ,� > w VIEW CIRCLE z D J '� �• Q (D v� Z o Z Q w LL CD 0 W ' O z adw � Q • n 0 w v, O ._ o w _1 > z 0 OZ O w cn / O - - ,. D w FUTURE MOVADO•WAY Napo, qw X TRAFFIC SIGNAL ILL W low + OVERLAND ROAD DRAWN BY DATE: JPW 1/27/25 - ' CHECKED:- JOB NO.: JPW 2454 main IIIL _ s FUTURE ROAD 1 _ v .. CONNECTIVITY NORTH A N X-`t .3 SHEET OF REVISIONS: W � O U O � U ' 0- 0 E ( y a p . Culvert �• . . E aNY ST pQ _ .. � Lo co N co D► Cul vets o ` - 59 Lo Co co CD 21 BOISE �"3 B M A ■ IN F LU.RI DA C - J r i 40 90 • ZONE - p7 ! Z��VE R7 1 IPA t c � (] 26 STAMP N r I co 4 2647266 E OVERLAND r dV 1r• '� Ac Culvert j ., m 2659.Aw Ur $ 2659.4 -/t � ZONE AH F r �_� � . E L �669 ELDORADO F _ »~ ., �, � N CORPORATE PARK = , ii ■..�, � • SIVERSTONE ..+ �� _ _ � -_ � CORPORATE PARK 2 ! - ''� OP Iff SIL1lERKING ST Q r- • '� w d3: S; fill z O z Z / , ■ 1 • . " DR .. . ,� -- _-- PEWTER �� � ,* W E (D .�ORIZO O .s a - -- n ► t0 D < • r U , Z > W Not- lq�t NA 0 W W Z o m CURRENT FEMA FLOOD MAP OF VICINITY • SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS SMALL AREA IN NE CORNER IN THE 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN THAT DOES NOT AFFECT DEVELOMENT OF SITE . • PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH HAVE FLOOD PLAIN AND FLOODWAY DRAWN BYDA2E25 HE KED: JOB NO.: IMPACTS WHICH COULD SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT DEVELOPMENT . JPW 2454 CURRENT FLOOD MAP ANX-4 .4 SHEET OF REVISIONS: Ir 40 AMEN? (D 'o r�Lf a . ■ • � ti f ,d. - �{�, 4 wry i r `•'� i � •— N (6 L Ecu (6 t Le R ----- - ---- - — -----_----------- — -- �,k co FU TURE -T VIEW C IRCLE _ - �-- DR. EXTENSION ` • - 1 - - - ., - _ ' �F' Yrfr'��. a .�. �+ o's. '• � .y ,�„4 *�- • f ; •+' "ram •� 1 ' •�.. 1`� - ' r / r sp 1. I ■ e +� $" ..:._ 1 T , +• • . _ _-; STAM P f POTENTIAL MIXED USE all" N. JOL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT _+ L r a - OR# f: oo I 4 , _ -• ti crPOTENT 410 y � AL MIXED USE FUTURE IDEVELOPMENT 1 - # W � r F POTENTIAL MIXED USE ,•' FUTURE DEVELOPMENT "- .• x .•� :� POSSIBLE FUTURE w L CONNECTIVITY TO S. > ROLLING HILLS00 ` i i { ` � y i '• Q CONNECTIVITY TO FUTURE _ '+�� u,t J z DEVELOPMENT - a' - Q a - _r.4 _ r• T. w _ • _ POTENTIAL CONVERSION TO *`�+'r __ '14z D �� •; FUTURE RETAIL " ]' S DEVELOPMENT dv r.:.Y �. - ' - •r' 'i r •, • 4T-• ter• •� '� - 74 * + O z FUTURE MOVADO Overhand fi� �� � w �k � WAY TRAFFIC o J. �, r ire% SIGNAL -', w w �• • Y y ` DRAWN BY DATE: R' M1 .1► [I 1 • � t' 7 - J PW 1/27/25 CHECKED: JOB N RP JPW 2454 _ EXAMPLE DEVELOPMENT ` '�, • � - VISION t _ ANX-5.0 NORTH SHEET OF • • �.�t � �9= - _ - - - r� � _� �'�, fir. r.,7^lr� �'�f � � '.Y ;�'� .; '� -=�•fit 1 f. [ II +Y}J• !{, f _ + 5"Pil^i `�114r-1! ' _X,r'' - - -' + �. :. _" 'h. a.� �,�,' - 1Y'C"a r#' �4 ►: �. � �� —_ _ :a..�s��� `�= I- �. ��_I `_I - — 1.' � Ii:ti �I _� M1= � '- � � � 1 -_ .�7p• `-'- - .�`� _��� `fi � - - .�-�.' „ yam: -�:..�' _ _— -- �' -� _ ... ' ! .r.� � '�- - II r _ • -'' 4' �Jy .�}' r ''' .YF•�.�. .. I# f -i{�. . _ I r �i I..r 17 �1 }f �I vl��.v�� . +' - r.F_ _ • _ - •F - _ • i LL L` w,T .jam r aJ .I' _ ..� .!�_ _. '� * �, k �'.T n ♦ � �'. � � �' �� I � i.5� `•�' � IC 7 � -,yam �1 � •. 4 36 WN A AL No .71 �i , I. l i � 1 � • ti +"�r1t �� � � � �r', r. r� � F~� �•�,h� � "�ly �J S�''-_'�'•+.+ . ,t �?r-�r�.�_ � _ * _ , � .r 4e no-,.- •�: ��. �� I � � r ~ REVISIONS: 17 co • Rp f r, 0- 0 t 5.• NV ii is ,tot' f > O� r QC.I-a�^ida Cook coo Jos i k .._ 208-565-9122 (y) Co Y y, Q - �r-VL ►l;r' r ryy� 4 CAI .•�.r�`_h.. �.t`.'.._�'..•:?-" �` �1 i:.Ji elf��._ •�y• .. �• - _ - 'his%- •=},r, '.y;�.� �F.s",•" _ �• `- =i" �y � ^�[?.�.�•••;,_,� ':#..dry �:. 'f:. won tit Or 6W' i,, pp �b •�� ,.'{• '•'v+"'t^�- - - - -'-titF� _":i� \ , ,'��3i i. _ rS�fd%' tip•• y. _ r" _ f ��4•. - - - `s:..�'>'•• yr. p{ N, •r� �� � C- _ ��.. �r' :v'�..-� '.y' 1_i-� ' ate '� •3. - !may t :4r+ 'f. •. .� y }rr,3P �•�C 1f '�,' i .7 �: `. :���aEic;Br•: �:.y=. r M1 C �ti Sr y.� �� r} _, . — r' •:.tee`- K!,'�r'Ct� R.Y v: �bi': I' = STAMP �' '� � �� t�. k.,•;,:r' �'.'.., ." �'��y - ;�r. - ���.::pF ,ill gyp ,�J�(/u''1� -'S. ••z. yyrly' �-^�{' .i~,`tom c titN-•�-�-�•aKtf`?�• V ` ,TS;-:*.� ► '•i"t '' i' ♦.. .s M1 r :'v-� -� •. i.- rr >-ski' '�r�,�. �'• "`//,4 i, .(i •1�'J7� •��-•� �:4='r�i�,�����Ti �e .y� '�i tl��!��'r n •rem 9•Y''' 'r `l �- '�•' S'4••�.�`��r Y.1i� ... k =� �"""�•..i iW SI'd.1� ZeST^.><.. im ,.. IF ANNEXATION IS DENIED, IF ANNEXATION IS APPROVED • PROPERTY REMAINS COMPOSED OF PROPERTY IS CLEANED UP AND RE -DEVELOPED N co UNOCCUPIABLE , DILAPIDATED STUCTURES WITH A USE THAT PROVIDES VALUE TO THE z o WITH OVERGROWN WEEDS AND DYING SURROUNDING COMMUNITY. _j z OR zo LANDSCAPING FOR AN INDEFINITE AMOUNT PROPOSED DESIGN WILL PROVIDE m w - OF TIME . CONNECTIVITY TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT z Q • AS AN ADA COUNTY R-1 ZONE = ONLY PROPOSED DESIGN WILL MAINTAIN z o z w � 0 DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY IS A SINGLE CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER COMMERCIAL USES ' z Oz � _j FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING CURRENTLY PROVIDED ALONG OVERLAND > � w • WHAT IS THE PATH FORWARD FOR THIS ACCORDING TO ACHD THE PROPOSED USE WILL o w w PROPERTY? HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON EXISTING TRAFFIC z0 m VOLUMES IN THE AREA. DRAWN BY DATE: JPW 1/27/25 CHECK JOB NO.: JPW 2454 CONCLUSION ANX-7 .0 SHEET OF W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Fairview Drive-through (H-2024-0049) by Ethan Mansfield, Hawkins Company, located at 4300 E. Fairview Ave. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0049 A. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through facility for a coffee shop that is within three hundred (300) feet of another drive-through facility and an existing residence. B. Request: Modified Development Agreement to create a new Development Agreement to establish the hours of operations to begin service of the coffee shop at 5:OOam and approve new concept plans. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: January 28, 2025 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 3 PROJECT NAME: Fairview Drive-Through (H-2024-0049) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify j (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 1 r 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/28/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council :::Area of Impact WIN City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis ..;.,... 208-884-5533 .j Iritter@meridiancity.org ; APPLICANT: Ethan Mansfield,Hawkins Companies, LLC SUBJECT: H-2024-0049 Fairview Drive-Through CUP,MDA LOCATION: 4300 E. Fairview Avenue, located in a portion of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4, Section _F LIA ;; 4,T3N,R1E I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary A Conditional Use Permit for the development of an 1,843 square foot quick-lube oil change facility and drive-through coffee shop within three hundred(300) feet of another drive-through facility and an existing residence; create a new development agreement to establish new hours of operations for the coffee shop to begin service at 5 AM; and approve new concept plan on a 0.76-acre parcel located at 4300 E. Fairview Avenue in the C-G zoning District. B. Issues/Waivers The applicant is asking for a Council waiver to reduce the twenty-five(25) landscape buffer for the area in which the trash enclosure would occupy in order to expand the existing trash enclosure on the property to the west with the property owner's permission. Currently,a portion of the trash enclosure on the property to the west extends onto the applicant's property. C. Recommendation Staff: Approval w/conditions D. Decision City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Quick-Lube Oil Change and Drive-Through Coffee Shop - Existing Zoning General Retail and Service Commercial District(C-G) VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning General Retail and Service Commercial District(C-G) Adopted FLUM Designation Commercial VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Commercial Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 8/5/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/5/2024 Site posting date 12/5/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.D • Comments Received Yes, Staff Report - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Fairview Avenue - • Traffic Level of Service Better than"E" - ITD Comments Received No Comments Meridian Fire No Comments Meridian Police No Comments Meridian Public Works Wastewater • Distance to Mainline Sewer is available at the site • Impacts or Concerns Ensure no sewer services pass through infiltration trenches Meridian Public Works Water • Distance to Mainline Water is available at the site • Impacts or Concerns No Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Fairview Drive-Through CUP,MDA H-2024-0049 (copy this link into a separate browser). City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S1104438700 Date Retrieved:2024/11/8 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 332 Surrounding Area 197 160 ® City Limits 869.7 ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:9.7% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 57% 46% 20% Multi-family ® Commercial 43 34% Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 2 4 6 8 0 500 1000 1500 ■ Single-family ® Multi-family Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics Level of Service Planning Thresholds 1. Condition of Area Roadways Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per hour(VPH) Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service Fairview Avenue 142-feet Arterial 1611 Better than "E" *Acceptable level of service for a five-lane principal arterial is"E" (1,780 VPH). **ACHD does not set level of service thresholds for State Highways. 2. Average Daily Traffic Count(VDT) Average daily traffic counts are based on ACHD's most current traffic counts. • The average daily traffic count for Fairview Avenue west of Cloverdale Road was 35,600 on July 16, 2024. Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. Figure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService . ■ Ready Marginal Caution L0�a 011 o0 a� Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview Commercial Land Uses-This designation will provide a full range of commercial uses to serve area residents and visitors.Desired uses may include retail,restaurants,personal and professional services, and office uses,as well as appropriate public and quasi-public uses. Multi-family residential may be allowed in some cases but should be careful to promote a high quality of life through thoughtful site design, connectivity, and amenities. Sample zoning include: C-N, C-C, and C-G. The property is currently zoned General Retail and Service Commercial District(C-G)which allows the largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office, service, and light industrial uses. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History AZ-04-026,CUP-04-035,DA Inst.# 105022224 Mountain West Bank Acreage 0.76 B. History The property was approved for annexation and zoning on October 26,2004,from Rural Urban Transition(RUT)to C-G for approximately 2.48 acres of land and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)for a new 4,500 square-foot bank with a drive-through. The current Development Agreement requires a CUP for all uses and restricts the hours of operation from 7 am to 7 pm. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): Applicant is proposing a construct a quick-lube oil change facility and drive-through coffee shop. The building will be approximately 1,843 gross square feet overall and is proposed to be twenty-six(26) feet in height. The applicant is proposing seventeen 17)parking spaces which exceeds the required seven(7)spaces per UDC 11-2. The site is currently vacant with no structures. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): Applicant is proposing a construct an 1,843 square foot building with a quick-lube oil change facility and drive-through coffee shop. The applicant is proposing to add lane striping to better define the additional queuing space available to each user as customers will typically enter the development from the southern entrance off Fairview Avenue. Directional signage will indicate the location of the oil change tenant and the coffee shop tenant's queuing area. The applicant states the typical number of services for this oil change user is up to six(6) vehicles in the peak hour. The site plan shown in Exhibit VIIC shows the proposed quick- lube oil change shop can accommodate up to 6 vehicles—two in the service bays and four(4) stacked behind—without vehicles stacking in the east-west drive aisle. Per the queuing analysis completed for the coffee shop(Human Bean),the 95th percentile queuing rate is four(4)vehicles,with a maximum expected queuing of six(6)vehicles. The applicant states there would be no vehicles from the coffee shop stacking in front of the oil change entrance. The striping and directional signage provided will ensure that even in unexpected instances of extremely high demand, stacking can be reasonably accommodated. A pedestrian entrance to the site will be placed in front of the coffee shop to accommodate bike/pedestrian walk-up service. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Employee parking spaces have been placed along the north side of the site and will be signed as"Employee Parking"to eliminate the possibility of conflict with the east-west drive aisle during the coffee shop's busiest hours. In reviewing the site plan, staff feels moving the employee parking to the south side of the lot to align with the parking layout for the adjacent bank to the west. Staff feels this will help minimize conflicts between vehicles using the coffee shop drive-through and customers accessing the quick-lube oil change facility,while also ensuring sufficient stacking space for the coffee shop drive-through. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed drive-through building will be approximately 1,843 gross square feet overall and is twenty-six(26)feet in height with seventeen(17)parking spaces. This site complies with the dimensional standards for the C-G zoning district. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): Vehicle Repair, Major and Minor(UDC 11-4-3-37) A. Where adjoining a residential property or district, all repair activities(including,but not limited to, open pits and lifts) shall occur within an enclosed structure. B. Inoperable or dismantled motor vehicles shall be stored behind a closed vision fence, wall,or screen or within an enclosed structure and shall not be visible from the street. Drive-Through Establishment(UDC 11-4-3-11) A. A drive-through establishment shall be an accessory use where the drive-through facility (including stacking lanes, speaker and/or order area,pick up windows, and exit lanes)is: 1. Not within three hundred three hundred(300) feet of another drive-through facility, a residential district, or an existing residence: or 2. Separated by an arterial street from any other drive-through facility,residential district or existing residence; or 3. Not within the O-T zoning district. Otherwise a conditional use permit is required. A Conditional Use Permit is required as the drive-through is within three hundred(300) feet of another drive-through and an existing residence. B. All establishments providing drive-through service shall identify the stacking lane,menu and speaker location(if applicable),and window location on the certificate of zoning compliance or the conditional use permit. Speakers are prohibited in the O-T zoning district. The site plan shown in Exhibit B provides the location of the stacking lane for the proposed coffee shop. C. A site plan shall be submitted that demonstrates safe pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation on the site and between adjacent properties.At a minimum the plan shall demonstrate compliance with the following standards: 1. Stacking lanes shall have sufficient capacity to prevent obstruction of driveways, drive aisles,and the public right-of-way by patrons. Moving the employee parking to the south side of the lot to align with the parking layout for the adjacent bank to the west will help minimize conflicts between vehicles using the coffee shop drive-through and customers accessing the quick-lube oil change facility, while also ensuring sufficient stacking space for the coffee shop City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis drive-through. 2. The stacking lane shall be a separate lane from the circulation lanes needed for access and parking, except stacking lanes may provide access to designated employee parking. 3. The stacking lane shall not be located within ten(10)feet of any residential district or existing residence. The stacking lane is proposed to be over twenty-five feet away from the residential property. 4. Any stacking lane greater than one hundred 100 feet in length shall provide for an escape lane. The staking lane is not greater than 100 feet in length therefore an escape lane is not required. 5. The site should be designed so that the drive-through is visible from a public street for surveillance purposes. The drive-through is visible from E. Fairview Avenue. D. The applicant shall provide a six-foot sight obscuring fence where a stacking lane or window location adjoins a residential district or an existing residence. There is an existing six (6)foot wooden fence on the north side of the property adjacent to the existing residential home. Restaurant(UDC 11-4-3-49) A. Parking. 1. At a minimum,one(1)parking space shall be provided for every two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. Upon any change of use for an existing building or tenant space,a detailed parking plan shall be submitted that identifies the available parking for the overall site that complies with the requirements of this title. Per UDC 11-3C restaurants require one(1)parking space for every two hundred and fifty (250)square feet of gross floor area. The total number of parking spaces required is seven (7). The applicant is proposing seventeen (17)parking spaces which exceeds the required number parking spaces for this proposal. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan 3.07.02A, Comp Plan 5.01.02D, UDC H- 3A-19): Require pedestrian circulation plans to ensure safety and convenient access across the commercial development. Require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods. Therefore, buildings shall be designed in accord with the "City of Meridian Architectural Standards Manual." Per UDC 11-3A-19 pedestrian walkways shall provide a continuous walkway that is a minimum of five(5)feet in width from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance(s)for nonresidential uses. The internal pedestrian walkway shall be distinguished City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis from the vehicular driving surfaces through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks. In reviewing the site plan layout, staff recommends that employee parking be located on the south side of the lot to align with the parking layout for the adjacent bank to the west. This arrangement would help minimize conflicts between vehicles using the coffee shop drive- through and customers accessing the quick-lube oil change facility, while also ensuring sufficient stacking space for the coffee shop drive-through. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets Per UDC 11-2B-3, landscape buffers along arterial shall be thirty-five (35)feet in width. The applicant will be required to install the landscape buffer along E. Fairview Avenue. The landscape buffer shall be located entirely outside of any existing right-of-way and any additional right-way required by ACHD with this application.All trees shall be located beyond the required street right-way. ii. Parking lot landscaping Per UDC 11-3B-8, the applicant shall provide perimeter and internal parking lot landscaping to soften and mitigate the visual and heat island effect of a large expanse of asphalt in parking lots, and to improve the safety and comfort ofpedestrians.A five-foot wide minimum landscape buffer adjacent to parking, loading, or other paved vehicular use areas. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses Provide a minimum twenty-five (25)foot wide landscape buffer along the entire north property line,as proposed. Materials used in the buffer shall meet the requirements of UDC 11-3B-9. The applicant is requesting a Council waiver to place the trash enclosure into the landscape buffer to match the existing trash enclosure for the adjacent property to the west. Staff is asking the applicant to work with the adjacent property owner to expand the existing trash enclosure and request council waiver to reduce the landscape buffer for the area in which the trash enclosure is located. iv. Storm integration An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis Per UDC 11-3C Restaurants require one(1)parking space for every two hundred and fifty(250)square feet of gross floor area. The total number of parking spaces required is seven (7). The applicant is proposing seventeen (17)parking spaces which exceeds the required number parking spaces for this proposal. The applicant will be required to install wheel stops for the compact stalls or widen the sidewalk to seven (7)feet to prevent vehicles from overhanging on the sidewalk. ii. Bicycle parking analysis Per UDC 11-3C-6.G One (1) bicycle parking space shall be provided for every twenty- five(25)proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, except for single-family City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis residences, two-family duplexes, and townhouses. Based on seventeen (17)parking spaces being proposed, one (1) bicycle parking space is required. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed structure as shown in Section VII.F. Building materials consist of stucco, stone, wood and metal accent. Final design is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and recorded development agreement. The Comprehensive Plan's goal is to require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods. 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): There is an existingfence along the north property line that was required with the annexation, zoning and CUP in 2004. No additional fencing required. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan 6.01.02C, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access to the property is from E. Fairview Avenue in accord with UDC 11-3A-3. The Comprehensive Plan's goal is to require new development to establish street connections to existing local roads and collectors as well as to underdeveloped adjacent properties. 2. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. F. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-I S): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): The applicant shall design and construct and adequate storm drainage system in accordance with the city's adopted standards and shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the city. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.03A, UDC 11-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development. All utilities are available to the site. Water main, fire hydrant and water service require a twenty- foot(20)wide easement that extends ten(10)feet past the end of main,hydrant, or water meter.No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. G. Development Agreement The Applicant is requesting a modification to the existing Development Agreement (DA)Inst. #105022224. The current Development Agreement requires a CUP for all uses and restricts the hours of operation from 7 am to 7 pm. The applicant is requesting the following changes: City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis A. Adopt the Special Recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission as follows: 1. The hours of operation for businesses on this site are limited from 5-7 am to 6-7 pm since the site abuts single-family residences. UDC 11-113-313 limits hours of operation in the C-G zoning district from 6 am to 11 pm. As the DA is the governing document for this property,the applicant is requesting that Council approve a modification of the existing agreement to allow the changes request in the hours of operation for the drive-through coffee shop. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. Development Agreement Modification: Fifteen(15)days prior to the City Council hearing,the applicant shall provide the revised concept plan for the site and landscaping plan showing the employee parking located on the south side of the lot to align with the parking layout for the adjacent bank to the west or a layout that is amenable to the staff and the applicant. a. The modified DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council approval of the Findings. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions: b. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the proposed site plan, landscape plans and conceptual building elevations included in Section VII-D and VII-E and the provisions contained herein. 2. Conditional Use Permit: 2.1 The Applicant shall comply with all specific use standards for the proposed use of Multi-family Residential Development(UDC 11-4-3-27). 2.2 The Applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Administrative Design Review(DES)approvals before submitting for any building permit within this development. 2.3 Future development shall be consistent with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-213-3-7 for the C-G zoning district. 2.4 Off-street parking is required to be provided by the standards listed in UDC Table I I- 3C-6 for restaurant. 2.5 The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 2.6 Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as outlined in UDC 11-3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6, and UDC 9-1-28. 2.7 Upon completion of the landscape installation,a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are City of Meridian Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as outlined in UDC 11- 3B-14. 2.8 This project is subject to all current City of Meridian ordinances and shall comply with the previous conditions of approvals associated with this site (AZ-04-026; CUP- 04-035; DA Inst. #105022224). 2.9 The Applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Administrative Design Review(DES)approvals before submitting for any building permit within this development. 2.10 Compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-I1—Drive-Through Establishment, Vehicle repair,major and minor UDC 11-4-3-37 and standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-49—Restaurant is required. 2.11 The landscape buffer along Fairview Avenue shall be located entirely outside of any existing right-way and any additional right-way required by ACHD with this application. All trees shall be located beyond the required street right-of-way. 2.12 Provide wheel stops for the compact spaces. 2.13 Provide a copy of the recorded easement for the water connection from the adjacent property with the submittal of the CZC and Design Review. 2.14 The conditional use permit is valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the Applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground as set forth in UDC 11-5B-6.A time extension may be requested as set forth in UDC 11-513-617. B. Irrigation Districts 1. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=367036&dbid=0&redo=MeridianCit X C. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=367036&dbid=0&redo=MeridianCit X D. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=367036&dbid=O&repo=MeridianCit X E. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.org WWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=367036&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions V. FINDINGS A. Conditional Use(UDC 11-5B-6E) The commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: l. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Stafffinds that the site is large is enough to accommodate the proposed uses as the site is 0.761 acres. The proposed multi-tenant building with the quick-lube oil change facility and coffee shop drive-through restaurant will be approximately 1,843 gross square feet overall and fifty(50)feet in height. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Stafffinds the proposed quick-lube oil change facility and coffee shop drive-through restaurant will be harmonious with the uses allowed in the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with applicable UDC standards with the conditions noted in Section IV of this report. 3. That the design, construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Stafffinds the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed use will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood, with the existing and intended character of the vicinity and will not adversely change the essential character of the area. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The quick-lube oil change facility and coffee shop drive-through restaurant complies with the purpose statement of the C-G zone which is to provide the largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office, service, and light industrial uses. Other permitted uses within the C-G zone include retail, restaurants,personal and professional services, as well as appropriate public and quasi public uses. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. Stafffinds the proposed use will be served by essential public facilities and services as required. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Stafffinds the proposed use will not create additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes,materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Stafffinds the proposed use will not be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by the reasons noted above. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction,loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Stafffinds the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any such features. 9. Additional findings for the alteration or extension of a nonconforming use: This finding is not applicable. 10. That the proposed nonconforming use does not encourage or set a precedent for additional nonconforming uses within the area; and, This finding is not applicable. 11. That the proposed nonconforming use is developed to a similar or greater level of conformity with the development standards as set forth in this title as compared to the level of development of the surrounding properties. This finding is not applicable. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Approval of the proposed conditional use permit with the conditions in Section IV per the Findings in Section V. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 19,2024. At the public heariniz,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Conditional Use Permit and Development Agreement Modification requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Ethan Hawkins, applicant b. In opposition:None C. Commenting d. Written testimony: Anna Downing=oppose oil change and fast food use due to proximity to residential neighborhood and many other reasons; Julie Parker—oppose development because it will be too noisy for the neighborhood as it is scheduled to open at 5 am and last into the evening; Sean Thompson—Noisy,hectic operations starting at 5 am and lasting into the evening, auto repair machinery and drive through speakers, air pollution from high traffic and idling vehicles,two businesses with drive through operations can cause potential traffic problems because they gave to share a common parking lot structure and ingress/egress,and the reduction of residential property values, Barry Thompson—In agreement with Sean Thompson; and Sandra G—Oppose the application and would like less going on around where she lives. e. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Key issues)of discussion by Commission: a. Coffee shop opening hours,trash enclosure location,revised site plan 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Revised site plan City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action ' 1 1 J. a ct C l- • I of Impa'it Analysis ILU a .U' sa —FAIRVIEW "'. �*� _ `+ _ :�_■ ,;■ Nor we go, ow PINE U '� ' al i am ��e�.�—•raaaaaa �yulnanII mun „'ll►i. �lIlIlIlI1011 l�lrl1[1[17Ir� IIaalilmlGii11y1111r Ron Legend f ia:f■■.u.u.u.n■..mu. 11111 Ila�� ■■■■■■■: uuuq■�. �/.,L �� l:1111::1111-' Lan11'im ■� in p unir111■r Project �PIII �.> uu uu u�.� mm�nnnm��■an ♦. ■am:nulr Illlllun u �nrnr■H11>•r-■midi► �-'-wdrl lilt ifulRr ■■■■1■■in■nn��•, - _ mill rHnl�■� � ■■■gr■■■1■■O _Iy6 ■nnn nis uu�urnm Analysis `IIIIa- �P"' ��•�■` ■■111■rr,lllln■■O euln_Ilt'Krlll .■11111n 1111111,.,\■, ,��ll ■11■1■Inlr■IIr1/�,,,�:i tl1111■I ��Ilalrrl ■■7■■■■...■■■Ir r rlrrw a..r■i� R llllla 1141 ME NN.....I w����-uun■�Z-mood■■! �� �� �111�111 p�1 'l::����=now�,�r al■u■■■ � �♦ `gljiiili: ����nun�j MINNnn rl � ■�■■m ohm' ���-�!� v:�� �unn �11Mi.:■nn■ 1� y� nn: ���� rr :■ddr um. `LPUC! ■■�'■ a ' ►u, Ii■nt nun....■ - f �i�:I��w• 'q�11-� ! ■�.-`r1� 1� ■=P�rmn.ienii ■:'::::1.�rr • V f ■i ro.11 p Ian irr�IIIII►. _kpnmmrin� ' •�•� /Ia■1■n■■ � ••- annwnniunn r I lulll •`_ _ FAIRIIIEW ,E ` ■,:r J sauun (f, unullllul'_� ■Illllll: nuum rs n 111M dill _�lil1=° ulllllll IIIIIIP �i i 1� .. W nllr'i::.. ' 1 ==u1_e__ :Illllll .rl IIIIII ■-.�r � + Ir1+G+��:� 1 umuw=_s �iilllllllll�llllhli r�■-.����i T -�iiii .Y�:'■ m■■=.IIII. "►..mm� Al ., ur-111g111 1=�:11au�-um — PION E •, • nulllutn '=—��+ulllll�� ��� ■ ■■�11�1t�■ 111111111 1 /I■aall111III rill ia:�aa••••••••• _ I nHluuirin1111n4n rlrl unu■ g- d lllll IIO=�pnnm� unnfu■. � numu u Project Location ®— Lr� 111 11■� r1111i111f -.-a■■rr. lrnlq■:! ■nml nunnl�r■�••• rnmr■nloq llllllun u ■call III 1111111 pnnnln■nil� �1 Area • •• �111jill • ql 1- �"u:ur 1liln��a11111a-.:�ii • f1f11 :�� nunlAnill■w��1����@�I +In fir■1 runnnnnuml illy/lu rnnnn Analysis mom I Y - w111t11 a■!■■■■■■u■■r►/�711�: iriini� �pmun nu■■■■nilm r �•� nm0�-�r �,•nnn a1111111111 �*� i +••%u.�—�n�!nun ii•�� nil nrrl /I! 111��� mai I y 4 .0: ■— ■ ■..w■ml aim ■� ■rr■a fur ■n■nj /`fin:��— :-r r'�i �!�nm■ Sm I m�L■ \�i� n�■uum �. ■■i ■n■r fir■w IAb_Ira7t R■■Ill■■11■ ��ai �a -1�Rq•r 1•u w;y~ '!i r= nlhirma_ ■::::::::.Y, ■■ O!n■� ' li rlllr 111fl1 _ FAIRV'IEW— _ — _ ■ ii��rl ■ ..AN f l ryil■nll!lktllEl�EE J J f i�.�r■��7 ounlu ylll u• �—. _ • G - nlluuu°'_■ jllllllli iulum ■_� �o • ihff*i lnrrr>tl:1 - 1 ylii=?� ■■11111l1 IIIl11P r■J • - • =n1_a='_ :IIIIIII .111111111 r.ii ' '� 11 umuul�= -111111E1111�111111! IL•r•��i unnii■: t mill mail. 1■11 iitttf - 1■uuu �a7yn�@un ��` V i 111 PI r w�-■Ilillllly :Ilnu�-■ •f nil.=1111� FjNE hull i■�����IIIIIII `• �� ■ ■■�11■Its■■ 111111111 ��� ■ �� �■ ■■���1111■111 � �.� �irualnn�■rn :I.rrr......... IIIIrJS BOBnu■nrrGillglpnl ONES■ Iiiiliiu Legend - mom lllq Project Locati1 �hul uu ui.� mm�nnnm��■Iiiir 7nuq Illllluo u ■ tmill wil ese.2 -� Ills rllll{r - ■ _= ■■■rn■Ilnlll■ 1 C rill nnn■_wr p■rnr■■unn� _ qlq _�� 21116: � u■uuuln■r ■nnn%�e_`i 1 i �l 11:�� nuu�ulnn■.!11.1 � • • rryy City Limits111 �ail\� f■inn■fllllni�n lull IIl 1��1n ■nRn■ q�ll unnnn■■■n�^�,11�. r Imuir ��uuml Planned • uulrrrl■n■rill.. y� nm11� _ :■nnu II 1111 fir' n■■■n■�� i■n■■■■■ _ •■■■■■Ir . Analysis - ■ mm��n■nlr-- allllllllll 1111 i i•r■.�����nuw n�Z,�r.0 u +li • r nun is• nm il ♦ Y•••4i1i w ■���i 1■■■ �J��■■■u r U���' una/� y hn■:�-- •� minlil■1■III n�tllifllll�lll' ■■ i+ n ■ .'rin: i-r�� �6■mu _ L ■nm■ �■■r =__--= I .r��. �!■n ��■ 1�►Ill Ilaalf R■■Ill■■11■ �� --- = W l�ai ,. :i•\.C'� .1'� + •a■�'xf'hl •irr=_ wniuinu �:::::AA�■■ 1 mnnmrutrrnn � .or■ „- �1■1 IIII►, - •+•� ' /�rf -�-1 ■ 111■mil� ■ :•_ ' h lilq �_iuuniininin� �/ V I�il tuHl •••. - FA•IRVIf W - f "�. 11`■11■1 � a J■� rinn1ue11aeE1� ` J 1111 n• r.�■: _�alnllwum_■ ■IIIIIII:nuluw rs� p_IIII IllllpSI n��J 11 lunm� _•-IIh=qle?X uulllll IIIIIIP ��� ■ . ��;1.. .-G_ia�_=u1_a=. .IIIIIII .111111111 ■-.ar « ■���-1'=1==i_hum umuw=- 'lllllllllll Illllllli r�■a r•��11 w�rnunlRlll d=� -- ill ': r T p p unn■nruyl; m■■=.Illln ilnunl �� � r �-nnnlhlmu� ■fin-=mmu A■1�'1. �� �ern :++pi■uuu� d11111/���w;uuu�_Ilr/� = �i -::.i nun� fnf111E■r til;:f R��.�=all':.. `nil■rr - ii si" _'lll I■ ":.::: .. 1111 '�_ •��►�■' ' u1-u1►i -i:Iluu��unnun ��1■�am r r' ..■II111111 .y�■�■��w1111C r"r"'•l ^nil ............yn■uslllIIIII11111111111 t � YP`N�Ei ■ � � � `�� �;�1■;�;'■ 111111111 r■��� �� - � 111�■�II is i 5. Map Notes Nearby Recent Preliminary Plats within last 5-years) H-2018-0071 H-2019-0121 H-2020-0116 H-2021-0012 H-2022-0008 H-2022-0069 H-2023-0040 H-2023-0058 H-2024-0021 Nearb Recent Conditional Use Permits within last 5-years) H-2018-0107 H-2021-0103 H-2022-0046 B. Subject Site Photos l� City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits I� w 41, AL - =� # 4 - ,,,$S r-G,<" r 3 z '•..-� a a" ��-ice �w f � L� V a 7 - ❑ Ll j r•F. _ 4 �1 City of MeridianDepartment Re 11Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S1104438700 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 29 30th Percentile Description LDcation In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time 5-9 min. YELLM-V Emergency Services PDllce Meets response time goals most Df the time GREEN Pathways Not within 1/4 mile of current or future path .,;s RED Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets YELLO%k plan) > existing (# of lanes) & road �S in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLOW Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School arivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing Dr future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park GREEN 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Revised Site Plan(1/21/2025) ---. .-------- " -----{,a \\ _ ` ICY' I l a I Site Plan (date: 10/28/2024) _I T 3' �n: � �LL I km City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Landscape Plan (date: 10/29/2024) 0, =Wus ;v =Im 7 Wff V. ........... �j ' fA;.a 4>6�!M�MN E!"N km J, m 2 Rm Few 3 L2.0 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Building Elevations (date: 6/21/2024) E�IERI'OR�TEI111LL,....v. ■ rove Wnaiem« $ _ _._.__ ........ NIIIIIIIII d w m E7CIERIOR ELEVATION-CAST pE%TERIOR ELEVATION SOUTH IJ r�F 4 ❑ m�ew�..w...r ......... ----- _._ CD w a MEN z s a � ❑ - Tm9 e 3 (Dgj IORELEVATION-WEST (Dgj IOR ELEVATION-NORTH MIM A201 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES & DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days.Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development, government, and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2<5.0; R-4<2.0; R-8< 1.0; R-15 <0.5; R-40<0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan(e.g.pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources, including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F.Letter A represents free flow conditions, and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D, stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians, nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation Meridian City Council 0049-2024-H4300 E Fairview Ave.Coffee Shop and Oil Change January 28, 2025 Location 2 Site Plan(2.7/1,000 SF)5 spaces Parking Required: (6.5/1,000 SF)12 spaces Parking Provided: 3 Thank you Consistent with Staff recommendation.across Idaho and nationwide)(consistent with other Oil Changers 7pm –8am Oil Changers: •Beans across the valley and in Meridian)(consistent with other Human 7pm –5am Human Bean: •and operating hours within the DA of:49 with Conditions in the Staff Report -2024-Please approve H 4 Meridian Human Beans G-CT-OG-C 5 Hours of Operation 7 pm.–DA. Oil Changer will operate 8 am 7 pm operating hours within this CUP and –We respectfully request 5 am 7 pm Sat & Sun–6 am Friday; –7 pm Monday –5 am Traffic and Queuing 6 Location 277’ from nearest home 7 Updated Site Plan 8 Elevations 9– Elevations 10 Rear– W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Werre (SHP-2024-0004) by Benjamin Semple, Rodney Evans and Partners, LLC., located at 2945 W. Ustick Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/SHP-2024-0004 A. Request: Short Plat to subdivide an existing parcel consisting of 3.123 acres of land into two (2) building lots in the R-4 zoning district. i i PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: January 28, 2025 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 4 PROJECT NAME: Werre (SHP-2024-0004) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please 3 provide HOA name a;5 W h Are 2 d 3 2-b t �t Go IV 4 Dumb F-uo- ` '� 1N1�►���. mac! 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/28/2025 Legend DATE: project Location s TO: Mayor& City Council ::.Area of impact = City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 lritter@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Benjamin Semple,Rodney Evans and — _ Partners,LLC 7-77 SUBJECT: SHP-2024-0004 Were Short Plat LOCATION: 2945 W.Ustick Road, Located in Section 2 Township 3N,Range 1 W,parcel: S1202223011 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Short Plat to subdivide an existing parcel consisting of 3.123 acres of land, into two(2)building lots in the R-4 zoning district. B. Issues/Waivers None C. Recommendation Staff recommends approval with the conditions outlined in Section IV. D. Decision City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview I1. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing/Proposed Zoning R-4/R-4 VII.A.2 Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR) VII.A.2 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 7/30/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.E • Comments Received Letter - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Access from N.Morello Avenue,a local road - • Traffic Level of Service N/A - ITD Comments Received No Comment IVY Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site • Impacts or Concerns No Meridian Public Works Water • Distance to Mainline Available at the site • Impacts or Concerns No Note: See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. Werre Short Plat SHP-2024-0004(copy this link into a separate browser). City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:S1202223011 Date Retrieved:2024/12/6 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 508 Surrounding Area Alff"�, 278 1 4% Not city ® City Limits 4,694 1,744. ■ Not City 8 Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:5.4°I° Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 10,000 20,000 30,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family Multi-family is 0% is 3% ® Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed I I I Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 500 1000 0 100 200 Z51 ■ Single-family ❑ Multi-family City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics 2.00 4,500 Single-family y 4,000 T 1.50 3,500 V 0 Residential 3,00 Parcel Diversity 2,500 y 1.00 2,000 U 1500 Parcel Count 0.50 0.40 1,000 L Average Acres 0.00 0.16 CO=0.09 0000 a R-2 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 d Residential - Density 10.00 10.65 a 5.00 04.31 �6.08 4■59 2.53 0.00 Dwelling Units I Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. Figure 3: Service Impact Summary ImpactService . . Ready Marginal Caution - i�4e �NN- 011 op�d Q- Notes: See VIII.Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps,Tables,and Charts. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview Medium Density Residential designation allows for dwelling units at gross densities of three to eight dwelling units per acre. Density bonuses may be considered with the provision of additional public amenities such as a park, school, or land dedicated for public services. The proposed short plat aims to subdivide a 3.123-acre property located in the R-4 zoning district into two(2)building lots. The applicant intends to retain the existing single-family detached home on one lot and construct an additional single-family detached home on the newly created lot. Each lot will measure approximately 1.5 acres,resulting in a project density of 1.56 units per acre. While this density is significantly below the maximum permitted in the R-4 zoning district, staff believes the proposed subdivision represents a thoughtful approach to infill redevelopment. The project aligns with the city's goals of enhancing and optimizing underutilized areas, contributing positively to the surrounding neighborhood's character and functionality. Table 4:Proiect Overview Description Details History Ordinance 577 Annexation Residential Units 2 Single Family Detached Homes Acreage 3.123 acres Lots 2 Density 1.56 du/ac B. History The property was annexed in 1992 as part of the Candlelight Subdivision development. The property was not part of the plat it was only annexed and received R-4 zoning. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There is an existing single-family home that will remain on Lot 1 and will be accessed via a shared driveway off .N. Morello Avenue. The proposed driveway to the existing home shall be paved with the capability of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The use of the property will remain as single-family residential. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Future development of the proposed lots should comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-4 zoning district. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25 foot-wide street buffer is required adjacent to Ustick Road, an arterial street. This buffer should be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7. All street buffers with detached sidewalks or multiuse pathways shall be measured from the back of curb. Where ACHD is anticipating future widening of the street, the width of the buffer shall be measured from the ultimate curb location as anticipated by ACHD. Detached sidewalks and multiuse pathways shall have an average minimum separation of greater than four City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis (4)feet to back of curb.As there are overhead power lines along Ustick Road, ensure the proposed trees are applicable for the area.All street landscape buffers shall be on a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement, maintained by the property owner, homeowner's association or business owners'association. Per UDC 11-3B-7-3b, the minimum density of one(1) tree per thirty-five (35) linear feet is required. At least thirty-five(35)percent of qualifying trees must provide urban canopy at maturity, and at least twenty-five(25)percent of qualifying trees must be Class 2 selections, unless it can be shown that utility conflicts prohibit installation of Class 2 trees. ii. Tree preservation A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the final plat signature application detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-10C.5. 2. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. The applicant is proposing a new garage for the existing residence to meet this standard. Staff will confirm compliance with these standards at the time of building permit submittal for each residence. 3. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The applicant is not proposing any new fencing as there is fencing along the perimeter of the property. The applicant will enclose the open portion of the fence along Ustick Road where the current driveway is located upon approval. The applicant will also be removing the portion of the fence that is currently blocking the access from Morello Avenue. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access to this property is provided via a shared driveway off ... Morello Avenue. See common drive exhibit in Section VII.F. F. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan 3.03.3G, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 3.03.03F. Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development of the subdivision. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. The Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development: Ordinance 577 Annexation, as applicable. 2. If the City Engineer's signature has not been obtained within two(2)years of the City Council's approval of the short plat,the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained,per UDC 11-613-7. 3. Modify the plat to graphically depict the 25-foot landscape buffer along Ustick Road. Add a note to the plat stating the landscaping within the easement will be maintained by the property owners of Lot 1 and 2. 4. Future development shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table I1-2A-5 for the R-4 zoning district and the shared driveway exhibit in Section VII.D. 5. The driveway to the existing residence shall be paved with a surface with the capability of supporting fire vehicles and equipment per UDC 11-6C-3D. 6. Submit a Tree Mitigation Plan as part of your Landscape Plan with the final plat signature application detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-313-10C.5. 7. Revise the landscape plan to show the existing trees on Lot 2. 8. If the landscape buffer has not been installed prior to ACHD widening of Ustick Road and installation of the multiuse pathway, the applicant shall submit a surety for the landscape buffer prior to City Engineer signature. 9. Revise the landscape plan to show that at least twenty-five(25)percent of qualifying trees are Class 2 selections, unless it can be shown that utility conflicts prohibit installation of Class 2 trees per UDC 11-313-7-3b. 10. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the previous approvals noted above does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. B. Meridian Public Works SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: I. Request for a new Water Service connection and/or any changes to the existing services will need to be submitted for review and approval by Land Development. 2. Each Home will have to have its own water meter and tie into the 8"main. 3. The water service for the property on the West must be fully located in the shared driveway access easement and no portion should be located on the Eastern property that is not covered by the shared driveway easement. GENERAL CONDITIONS: I. Sanitary sewer service to this development is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development. 2. All improvements related to public life, safety and health shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures. Where approved by the City Engineer, an owner may post a performance surety for such improvements in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3B. 3. Upon installation of the landscaping and prior to inspection by Planning Department staff, the City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions applicant shall provide a written certificate of completion asset forth in UDC 11-3B-14A. 4. A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of 110%will be required for all incomplete fencing, landscaping, amenities,pressurized irrigation,prior to signature on the final plat. 5. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a performance surety in the amount of 125% of the total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature. This surety will be verified by a line item cost estimate provided by the owner to the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Surety Agreement with the City of Meridian. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website.Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 6. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post to the City a warranty surety in the amount of 20% of the total construction cost for all completed sewer, and water infrastructure for a duration of two years. This surety amount will be verified by a line item final cost invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond. Applicant must file an application for surety, which can be found on the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for more information at 887-2211. 7. In the event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and/or prior to occupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC 11-5C-3C. 8. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act. 9. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with any Section 404 Permitting that may be required by the Army Corps of Engineers. 10. Developer shall coordinate mailbox locations with the Meridian Post Office. 11. All grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC 11-1-4B. 12. Compaction test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfill,where footing would sit atop fill material. 13. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigation district or ACHD. The design engineer shall provide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans. This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is issued for any structures within the project. 14. At the completion of the project,the applicant shall be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any structures within the project. 15. Street light plan requirements are listed in section 6-7 of the Improvement Standards for Street Lighting (http://www.meridiancity.org/public_works.aspx?id=272). All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense. Final design shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights. The contractor's work and materials shall conform to the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC. Contact the City of Meridian Transportation and Utility Coordinator at 898-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 16. The applicant shall provide easement(s)for all public water/sewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water services and hydrants). The easement widths shall be 20-feet wide for a City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions single utility, or 30-feet wide for two. The easements shall not be dedicated via the plat,but rather dedicated outside the plat process using the City of Meridian's standard forms. The easement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes. Submit an executed easement (on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A) and an 81/2"x 11" map with bearings and distances (marked EXHIBIT B) for review. Both exhibits must be sealed, signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor. DO NOT RECORD. Add a note to the plat referencing this document. All easements must be submitted,reviewed,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engineer. 17. Applicant shall be responsible for application and compliance with and NPDES permitting that may be required by the Environmental Protection Agency. 18. The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6.). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single-point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to development plan approval. 19. All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, intersecting, crossing or laying adjacent and contiguous to the area being subdivided shall be addressed per UDC 11-3A-6. In performing such work,the applicant shall comply with Idaho Code 42-1207 and any other applicable law or regulation. C. Meridian Fire Department See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=378997&dbid=0&redo=MeridianCit X D. Irrigation Districts 1. Settler's Irrigation District See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=378997&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X E. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=378997&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X F. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=378997&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X V. FINDINGS A. Short Plat(UDC-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Medium Density Residential(MDR), the current zoning district of the site is R-4. Stafffinds the proposed short plat complies with the short plat standards listed in UDC 11-6B-5. Future development should comply with the dimensional standards for the R-4 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Stafffinds that public services will be provided and are adequate to serve the proposed lots. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Stafffinds all required utilities will be provided with lot development at the developer's expense. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Stafffinds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services as services are already being provided in this area. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Stafffinds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Staff is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with short platting the structure on this site. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval with the conditions outlined in Section IV. B. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action r � • W Y. — . -ct Location11 of Impact !J - J'7 Analysis aHIM - J- - USTICK r 1 f _ %In OR loons7 Legend !r 1•if I-son Project Location 111 yArea of Impact llr nr � i1i'�G 1 1j- rIsrIj ■I Ii11 1 . 10-4 lAnalysisyyn.�'illlrrlr■K fl ■�• n ru mn n 111!■i/IPII 1i111�#t r 1�M��II11 j ■aE■ rr■.ri — Z- YAlimp .! .�n!n■1 1y Igo � �� I111■��■r !r � p:.!a W w r � Y II ■o�!■{1� rrn r s1 lrr a Z vlm�l r11i rr■EIE■ 11 • if���� �l i ♦ J 'R r � s ar unnln!■ • � mar rrrnrrrp��•e� 9 � v uuuu. _E USTICK= 5a...■■...... $rll�,' 1 m �1�q •* ■i� �fw■rI��•1!r■EI -nn■rnn � -11 my ■�ri�; i! ��f■ i iA;ii a }u uri, � ri:■u■aa 1 m ..�1� ■r ■ ♦ !� � I ■n ■■■■■■r 1f ■■■♦ ■o■i i�4 w■■■fff ■it■■r r ■ rr��° r� P��Nn■s::�■E I Ali iisiir rr■n .■■ an ■....� ♦1 �iA°nil f■ !� ■ ■■� ■n■■..�11h■E■■:■..■■ ■n-r■r .r r��'�rr! �•■■rr ■nM r'i .f■�■a.1!r..�R �iur.■■■n■r■ ,::■nl ■ � ■ ■. ■:� ♦ ■r■nor ■■■rf■■f r B■■r !!r ■■■■■�Il■ I r>.■ ■ �r � ,p� i r .nu■. n 1 I:ar■■.r■■■■j 11���n■■■a ■:::rrrr ,ter:'■r�r■� arnaul: n11.rs:r� %1111i11111M•� ♦ �fij�r n■■■a n �C nuu f: ■!p ■nu■rrn■uq L nor. . u � 11 A� � ■nglnnr� i ♦ auu Y■rinnlnnnr■ •� r■■a► R■o■►■■nn. p �� ■�■ oil Noll i y'. 3'� III■!B■■aa � :.':a� ■aG■:::::::� ♦%�� •'16 1 �+ r;rr,�.a■■■nmrr milli rgAunn felon Im ; r rIL� ■■llruu■ 6. -♦r;■a.n ■■m • 111 1 : fi as ttfm■ ■ $`>. ��f♦ • r••■■1%% �. ■r E . � 1ff1■� 1■■■ ■tr ��■ noun�. i► r ♦1 w* ■ :■ �p1■ /ry. U■r ♦a■ :: rrrr■.ii IIHI '�"+ f r•r • ■. r!!! ■ • .� it arf%♦/1■. ■■r■V �1,� *jHl%■11■■rr■l' 111111 Illlllr/i_�■■iq�i �: 1 �'� r\� r■a t ~ all ■■unnna.tt• __'.. �I+.!�.■r�*�%.ilr�r r ■ I�_�=�7__�: ■n . i�� �0.�!iii�G lrlti n■.1.IaHIM '%/uq 111E mill■ t ��/In■rWA Le • Hill ♦ nHf" �:; • v■ Inn IProject Location . Area of Impact Low Density C.: Analysis Residential on MIN ~ Z 'r a'iiun v I►r►r ti�in►r�1::` ;. '♦l� III11 [rt a■rr� . r ones - IIIn 11r1 ffIr■I 'a ►�-■uu.'.'i Y non L■■k I� ■m■■■ __ n■n �.L iyu V .- 1► =uuluf�Il a►� i ■ W l+_ wnluu f■■ ■■/IIB 1 r ■ m .k�■[[I 1..1�� 1�, , I - � i 1'jr ii=:till yr+ ■r ■u■■ 1 �"I .I a■o fu r _.■► ash � N/// ■I�� 11.■.Ir ■■ um In ■ ■u■■r r rvE r■p;fuk'1n 11�1 7 ■q,■■• }�a/i, : I ■nin a r r m ■1 - r e�■ • �■�4 n : ■ Is ri�•aiii is^�III 5�■ ■sas■ • �. :'-1, rr nrr ♦ ■ R ur-■■ 11►■ ■ � � �i(wa. ■■ ■ a. ■nl �■■■■■.ter.■ .�■ :::' Ins�:��;.=: ■au■r. E ` ■■■■urr■ 11-� unn auuuu � yi A no v:1■r�n>A umnll. /II{�ar %/Irll!!!!1� 'a■ ■u■■n■■r■IN 7u► .nw■■■ ens-■umum �'\��R i f . nol EII1.U1 ■■■n. ■n// I■rnr� - ■■ ■i + 14//E.q/1////rr -� Ei■ � I I ♦ ♦ 11 r nq ■uu■■rr/■ n� y�4` •r ��r rauaullp■r ■. N 11 +aaN!■. S%::-T � Cp■ ufa ►.nn■ ++ wry l-� ♦ ■. r • '.►1♦ yr■=■■run rylunnm i#ri +I:':.. ♦ ■:.+ .*:r::■ Z�'(i/w�� IIIP.un■. - r`` .,�. ♦*,,. i♦I ♦ ♦ Imo.+�=If11 9♦ -n 1■innn�l , ►a/.f+i•+ �! s 1 ■n■11,11, ah��au 0 �pu.■iur......■nuq ♦ram/♦ arw■r■■1 rr.u/ ■-■- - • • A.iii•� ■■■`■::::■nn■■�.fl •�f•f � 7.71 11 �r EE r . ■♦ +E 11 IM■■ -:::::■V�•�-fl 1/1f■uu■a,11f .�-'. �._ �I_!.'♦.■l�a�.ry:r� ---Cam_-=:■s■.■r .w =•••••••FX ..409111 •IlrriilEii:i an!!1:1: Legend W Project Location �A r In on Area of Impact novol City Limits For o r {{I wain. ■urlrrr•��ul/�h► ■ �rir/mnn r Planned Parcels _ ON 4unl q . a 0 Analysis lI1 �5lrrrry::l`p�. �- y�=1K n1ul�1[I�'a El[r- �.p ri um•_• _- :(�=_-unn ee: ♦ k � y �R/n fa■-Jt7 I�u n IIh�Jrn° === � ♦1\1 I:ii a■� '1� LM■atn I:: rrrrrrrmrrr = # / ♦ r'Nx •brma'i�, tin' ��'Y'iirunnmll un= !'1 . ♦+ �m�'- 6,nii' •V _ � i �� r �:20, W.moll ~:.umn � lllp � 0'uum_l:a•' r 'ooe�z_ gym: USTICK •:,.::' IYAI - iair■ a■■■o•i'r ■1fl■/p//p Ip=, a ■m■■1!i 1 ���ii: /1E uEl mm r ara■n ♦ `�- _ "� nary . ■■ � r"��.■u/E. f f.r � Iii■ pia ■arum iV�- .�- -��Ill �/ uuil 1 7 . r /■rqq::::.. �•_�=� III . L'C7CrW�� •%>♦ �nk R ♦ re�a�rro i. -I► 71■ `■*i[iiii■• ♦ L �~I��11 a i..//f ■r ♦ ♦ /f■r•h.1 • [ .� an■■-•r: ■Or...... • ..■ *•f:.rl� ��=n /t ■ 11 v�. i..� au■ :iii'■iir♦ �`q■ ■ � I� �1� . ��(. � • r ■■ •■fun■ - - 11. ■una ■ ■uuuu■ s �i '1■rr R■� Ifa■ ■ a71rr uuna ■■.r/l■uuuu■ wnanr/ I� E r■ llrRlrrll ♦♦ •■■ ■rno rnE:nuuufrr■rl I.■ - q#. +,,uul nnurrrr■/1 um. mq nor� y ♦ w n■.-■noun/■ram 1.iiill IC: y�+ r ti Iq[[[1I11m... /■n1a. E/1 r■■n + ♦ �, t■ +■ ,r,',; � � rruEE11111/rR nrr h.nn■ ♦ � r ■ �...� �'i�r:�! r. y ..:. forum■ +��r..■•Zd ►� a .■ u. +� -+ IIIIIII[fE/■a .-�.�:I, r�....... �/��� ♦♦Ij � ��N%1-yip■e IIIIP �• a .r -+.. t �•� `w! �:ii ■..�::-'!/•� ay r►E �����=Ens :: ' yT •. :C ■� r gun Io a ■_- �Ir�l .. y .n - ►e • ■■ � /r 11„ �* nrl/■nn•■/ luu m Ir.mm� . :� U• ' +^�' �♦ �•�I�w''ll r 7;■nnllu.area ♦■n+�,a[an.nu■nnun■■► ■ G'� : isfj+A■/1rf1R r .■;, *�� r■/U, ir■. ■mom aft • p■•r rr ► 1. ■■ rr�■ Ir rw ra as}rj-..o■ nu: IIIH�j�'r • A .r�.� �*.•4+1arf11 l�aVr_..■.a■va■ • I�► . h a*xlrtrm.rl.n ono inwu___�l.a■/s s! , f .•A ■r■llf./H11f■'11 IIeLS?Gllj �If.� af5*w.r■.ii. --�_:�__•. fr■a i-r . .0.!!:::r,,.�7raiti��rnnn. ..u■ y •ai liiiiiiil 1111 NOR OWql. J♦ �a /' l �Y,nn■,I■� Ill Legend 6 � i■r � � Ij1 IIii1 m Iun n ProjectAre w ���:Q�:u■Irl1 •� • of ••City Limits i r ■■■�r■\y L�11lIrJf ��M . ♦, :III■■ lu �♦Iln.�'irnrr rrK fip-MON Iunl rr ;►nn��E. ■'r••1....!!ui Planned Parcels f.. li/alr p1111 r1 r.rq■ �� � �JtAr11lr1 ♦ r . 'Jll- ■,1,r' rrs nil ty 1_;:e-I■.-.■. _ pr11 Iy■.r Analysis i1111h1i■IlrRri ylrrrj .r ..♦. �a= _ _�_� ��1l� �1■■II i\•�i''11rr *i� S\�::a! i I II=_�Jlnm =__ I/il TIII�.a►6� V��Ij n� •Y_Isrrrrmrrl _g J � 1!1\ 1 �+� ♦■ � 1,111 Napo I PV nnumm�n Ina � �, � ��j� • '� W r,u Ron rrrl I � •�i Q - 'Jm a IIIIon - _ i � ;L�J�lum u�l -a::1�-•-.r .r.:: — ■� �♦ r in:irrrn rnann:r: - •■ m■■�an nnml I In ion • ■ a mnaa 1 waam �'-�=;IIi1■—,�� !�1 ■�r ♦4i uu a1 I ■ :tea w■aann � rll f _��f luuff � .. ■ �g ■r► 1 ■...w �37nnr h.� c ow rr ,fu ■wm � re ■ ♦ro a..r niR�l■... 9■■au■ • LL �•..�:p•.- �1 • rra uh■1 IR ■ In■■..�11 A wi` ♦r 'r��_7: !!!! .! ♦ nil ! r ■ili.■" • ■■■ •:■■ �I�=1 r pa ■■ a ■■ra■o■� �♦ �aln`�uum n:::Illiiiiiiiii■ �r�—`�'�r +♦iq�n,�l un A11Rrrr!! O w►3■ mu■ ,n�:uuunmarl�� nnl��,/'F� rno onn!!! --; nor nn rrrar� ♦ � � ■■■■■ � � � � 1 n■. ■uugrilal� Iil um. • ra =i Irnlrnl,I,n■, .!! ■aan . a ♦♦ �► ill ■�w■o: m mar �:� iw nn■:r stir 11 �� ♦ ♦ ♦iC:::: .� vi,o111pr on liaiin■ ♦ a��� ram:r■�..■ �♦:_:;i1 I : , laaoll >•Iwnnma i�I ♦� 1�7r ti :■ � � _..:■ a�llagv�lA w i�is.w i:, 1^�� • ++A■i>_. !r: L IIIIIIIniaa •� �■ ::..".� Zr�: i�'► h ♦ • a■■_IIIIII ! ¢-- ��.■ ■i■rw+ r<I*� .� • ��♦ram-urn , �1 y N>y �� � M�iai■ :iI!Fn i' ian �■� a ■-,,,= .. fill �{ ♦r ■■ iuu•11� • riiiiiaaii rii luu iai lemma=l. ._ ► yj�r■ •- • 11 gsn�jagwn■nunaaannncq'; {i1 r ♦r a�r1I1: a0a �� w la4U i■■a Iai i p■•■ ■■r■aiflii■ !i1 r�j�'Iti il r f• i2►♦ ♦I r a qt .r.i�i i� 1+_I I �iyw ail un■i ra.ai="■::: nn C'.ii .r iiO \�r �.■i■s1�11�i11��ara -is is:i f��.�`■1 all/■1*��.A�Fr! =11111 i11111 =_I_■aaR f�"e� ■ ♦ ■ �■ ■ra t��■■o■■ r� Innis _f.. ai5 a■■. . ��� =_�:fan rrR�: . .0.♦5:::..G r•♦w: =mnn ..1■q11 i 1 1 1 1 or all � :� y�' - .x. -13 •i�1 pay 4! ry —+'• 't'' 1. �� W - y � r y .! a •2 �_•I ��- - e.•, T.. y - _� _ rM �� t� _ ► .I - rs'l-hi fi 41 _ Ar Wi4der N s y64 - AWL City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits +tip t. SITE-LOO KING SW 1 SITE LOOKING SOUTH City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits ,Y ti slop Ampp- SITE- as DepartmentCity of Meridian po i M s- F r r _ y A City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report Overall Score: 35 �62nd Percentile Description Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing of lanes) School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLMN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community ParkWalkability Parkwithin 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within OGREEN 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Short Plat(date: 12/13/2024) PLAT SHOWING BOOK PAGE-_ RASIS°FREAKING WERRE SUBDIVISION °mµM°�O Wia.om Einssae irn�E 5�1 LaATEU WITHIN TXE GOVIERNMENE LOT40F om°z TowNswc3NomX, WESE, MExuowN, w.RTER [ITYQF MERIOIAN;,xD0.kCOU COUNEY,IMHONO - _PA �� _aL LEGEND +,I II p I NOTES C I I I I "'"'aClalo``wuusauwRmulu�:luos"owwa�wlmme .--^ • • x. � wxm[o,gl equndar +\ nio°x nS sxTM[cinuuv�leen�ov[o�lrv°hlaui a�vleolnFl I p "'".�s�.°rvl�lwolmiss=vrsaru�wE:vn�n.ne — — —sxnlola�TssExrxoxxmxv Ile .r, '. H°:o�.°ru"r`M"-!."vm�w" ii°;"0.;w°o`s�aai'i,,�.a50°aoK o xo�a°xN��x°,Ex „W L. aE�` R���l°na�ZT s xx m, I t NM1BPISS U.P 11 9' �=p°irsIN1L11...°.I[iMv�Noe'O koxxNcmw oav igwiu al xsaNN[[ • ,RM xFl,xxwllxP�n«>, I ,—,.m �,�� / VElwn°M�xNL.°�Mf�IJrtawrrv°°.x O ITgN pM1Y xa R I I I I �®t~ a Ixn�IG5r�0lquwngx oxmin xcomvun�x[wFmx o,Nxxo o �rx°mx°x � I I I _� �ewR,bFwn�wM1nlxmisR0.ueen wLL[owk�°,a°` — $ m -- — a NnFRaNvlmm.mm[vxc[�sRu[xw ABBREVIATIONS L —J—,--J L"x°l,E�°xlx,ww�°xnxE�,�°mlxmo~m e°vx ueeR.oamuxry acegays rr�xyr uxar xcNegN as wmnoa[[clrvn�IrvN / nwlrxa Nxow cw rwurrx, ! aas aE umxlN � I I REFERENCES � ° 1 a =tl NI AGENCY REVIEW 12-13-2024 Sl1RVEY00.NARRATIVE °+gxx'p pass -ElRwASUM�P.DZE�A wE�4$ H� �EEEEn=a;TME� xa LR Geo xFrF �Rl�wgJFMz°oM1JmM°�F �F�,xl=w�� x�srn° � . - u.smss mN.sry sxw lEwv..vEee10u.oµin.rvN -1I� �r, - - - - - - - City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Landscape Plan(date: 1/17/2025) —_) I o 'TI I - u?�. I i �S1 A. 1�592 A 1 I - I � uuwrwhsrC] I h � I I BgLCCK 1 l i _e _ N No,3 '. � I' r�ruiminv�iunaa-ma auHrscxEQu�E __ _______ atwf. _ _ __I' 3° I p_-- 1 6i� r =nr7 1 -�43k, lYm•YEpIY ¢g PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN E City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Common Drive Exhibit(date: 1/17/2025) -------------------------- - W. ATICK 1.531 Ac. 1.592 Ac II ----- -----1-7 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits VIII. ADDITIONAL NOTES & DETAILS FOR STAFF REPORT MAPS,TABLES,AND CHARTS (link to Community Metrics) A. One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Notes This data is automatically derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Date retrieved notes generally reflect data acquired or processed within the last 30- days.Analysis is based on a one-mile radius from the centroid of the identified parcel. Parcel based data excludes certain properties and represents land as it exists now. Properties considered are only those with a total assessed value greater than 0(i.e. excludes most HOA area,transitional development, government, and quasi government facilities). The following values also constrain included property acreage to reduce outliers and non-conforming instances from distorting averages: R-2<5.0; R-4<2.0; R-8< 1.0; R-15 <0.5; R-40<0.25. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. Some approved entitlements, and particularly older ones,may be constructed. Decennial population counts and household counts are based on the most recent Decennial Census. Current population and current household values are COMPASS estimates,usually for the year previous, and are based on traffic analysis zone boundaries(TAZ's). B. Mixed Use Analysis Notes This data is derived from enterprise application and GIS databases, and exported dynamically. Data considered for analysis are only those areas overlapping the overall Mixed Use boundary area. Mixed Use areas across arterial roadways are distinct, separate, and not considered as they do not meet the mixed use principles in the Comprehensive Plan(e.g.pedestrian safety, transportation efficiency, etc.). Mixed Use parcel areas may be greater or smaller than the future land use area designation boundary due parcel size,configuration,right-of-way, and other factors. Conditional Use Permits and Preliminary plat data likely include duplicate project submittals as they may be for the same project, approved at different times through multiple application types. Consider each independently or review prior application approvals. C. Service Assessment Notes This data represents existing conditions derived from our enterprise application and GIS database, exported through dynamic reporting. The system references the most recent available data from various sources, including sewer main lines, sewer trunksheds, floodplain, fire service areas and response times,police crime reporting,pathway information,existing and planned transit, roadway improvements, school and park proximity, and other resources. The tool provides context for project review,using multiple indicators consistently. Data from similar topics may vary based on different levels of review. The overall score is based on weighted criteria(not a ranked order), and the percentile score compares the parcel to others in the city(higher is better). This tool was developed as a City Council priority and outcome of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. Scores,whether high or low, are just one data point and should not be the sole basis for decisions. D. ACHD Roadway Infographic Notes The Ada County Highway District utilizes a number of planning and analysis tools to understand existing and future roadway conditions. • Existing Level of service(LOS).LOS indicator is a common metric to consider a driver's experience with a letter ranking from A to F.Letter A represents free flow conditions, and on the other end Level F represents forced flow with stop and go City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts conditions. These conditions usually represent peak hour driver experience. ACHD considers Level D, stable flow,to be acceptable. The LOS does not represent conditions for bikes or pedestrians, nor indicate whether improvements: are possible; if there are acceptable tradeoffs; or if there is a reasonable cost-benefit. • Integrated Five Year Work Plan (IFYWP).The IFYWP marker(yes/no) indicates whether the specified roadway is listed in the next 5-years. This work may vary, from concept design to construction. • Capital Improvement Plan(CIP).The CIP marker(yes/no)indicates whether the specified roadway is programmed for improvement in the next 20-years. City of Meridian I Department Report VIII. Additional Notes&Details for Staff Report Maps, Tables, and Charts V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 25-2071: An ordinance (Black Cat East— H-2024-0047) annexing a parcel of land located in the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 3.62 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-005937 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=4 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 01/29/2025 08:21 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2071 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR, WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE (BLACK CAT EAST — H-2024-0047) ANNEXING A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 16,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT"A"; REZONING 3.62 ACRES OF SUCH REAL PROPERTY FROM RUT (RURAL URBAN TRANSITION) TO THE I-L (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO ALTER ALL APPLICABLE USE AND AREA MAPS AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS AND ALL OFFICIAL MAPS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY TREASURER, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Meridian received a written request from property owner Meridian BC Holdings LP to annex and rezone the land described in the legal descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the maps attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("Subject Property"), which exhibits are incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS,the Subject Property is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-222 to annex the Subject Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby annexes the Subject Property. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby rezones 3.62 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the I-L(Light Industrial) Zoning District. SECTION 3. That City Staff is hereby directed to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—BLACK CAT EAST H-2024-0047 Page I SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and its exhibits with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publication, in accordance with law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 28th day of January, 2025. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 28th day of January, 2025. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this day of 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public Commission Expiration: ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—BLACK CAT EAST H-2024-0047 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: i William L.M.Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian,Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. William L. M. Nary, City Attorney j i SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2071 i An ordinance (Black Cat East — H-2024-0047) annexing a parcel of land located in the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 3.62 acres of such real property from RUT(Rural Urban Transition)to the I-L (Light Industrial)zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B.] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—BLACK CAT EAST H-2024-0047 Page 3 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION fe— T H E Page 1 of 1 .i ry LAND GROUP July 17. 2024 Project No. 121102 EXHIBIT A BLACK CAT ROAD— BUILDING L ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the East Quarter Corner of Section 16 of said Township 3 North, Range 1 West, (from which point the Section Corner common to Sections 9, 10, 15 and 16 of said Township 3 North, Range 1 West bears South 00'43'07" West, a distance of 2656.35 feet distant); Thence from said East Quarter Corner,South 00'43'07" West, a distance of 99.88 feet on the East line of said Section 16 to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing South 00' 43' 07" West, a distance of 454.28 feet on said East line; Thence North 89' 16' 53" West, a distance of 347.82 feet; Thence North 00' 46' 01" East, a distance of 454.28 feet; Thence South 89' 16' 53" East, a distance of 347.44 feet on said East line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel contains 3.62 acres more or less. PREPARED BY: THE LAND GROUP, INC. T ND a '7880 � 7-17-2024 James R. Washburn �'V OF WA 462 East Shore Drive, Suite 100, Eagle, Idaho 83616 208.939.4041 thelandgroupinc.com EXHIBIT B ~'R n'I' — — — — — \— — — — — — — R/W � 't E 1/4 o 00 SEC. 16 RAW 0 0 S89°16'53"ER347.44' � 0 P.O.B. Q 5. � CC N C N N Q M I BUILDING L PARCEL V u, 3.62 Acres± o o v o (157,922 Ft2) v c') J o o v o m cn C/) O y I N89°16'53"W 347.82' 60 p,L LAN CDD I o N �v C/:) i a "7880 0 7-17-2024 S.16 I S.15 �q�T�TF OF S.21 S.22 SE COR. 100' 200' SEC. 16 p Exhibit "B" 121102 a Horizontal Scale:1 = 100' Date of Issuance:July 17,2024 Building LTM =THE .� LAND Black Cat Industrial GROUP Annexation Description V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 25-2072: An ordinance (Pivot Pointe Subdivision — H-2024- 0029) annexing a parcel of land located in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A"; rezoning 7.64 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the R-8 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning district, directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-005938 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=4 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 01/29/2025 08:21 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2072 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON STRADER, TAYLOR, WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE (PIVOT POINTE SUBDIVISION — H-2024-0029) ANNEXING A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; REZONING 7.64 ACRES OF SUCH REAL PROPERTY FROM RUT (RURAL URBAN TRANSITION) TO THE R-8 (MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO ALTER ALL APPLICABLE USE AND AREA MAPS AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS AND ALL OFFICIAL MAPS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY TREASURER,THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER,AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Meridian received a written request from property owner KB Home Idaho LLC to annex and rezone the land described in the legal descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit "A"and the maps attached hereto as Exhibit"B"("Subject Property"),which exhibits are incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS,the Subject Property is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho; WHEREAS, the City of Meridian is authorized by Idaho Code section 50-222 to annex the Subject Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby annexes the Subject Property. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of Meridian hereby rezones 7.64 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the R-8 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning district. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—PIVOT POINTE SUBDIVISION H-2024-0029 Page I SECTION 3. That City Staff is hereby directed to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and its exhibits with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon publication, in accordance with law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 28tn day of January, 2025. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 28th day of January, 2025. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this 28th day of January 2025,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Robert E.Simison and Chris Johnson known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public Commission Expiration: 3-28-2028 ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—PIVOT POINTE SUBDIVISION H-2024-0029 Page 2 i i CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: 1 i William L.M.Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. (t"J' William L. M.Nary, City Attorney i SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 25-2072 An ordinance (Pivot Pointe Subdivision — H-2024-0029) annexing a parcel of land located in the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described in Exhibit"A";rezoning 7.64 acres of such real property from RUT (Rural Urban Transition) to the R-8 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning district; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; repealing conflicting ordinances; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B.] ANNEXATION ORDINANCE—PIVOT POINTE SUBDIVISION H-2024-0029 Page 4 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Proposed Pivot Pointe Subdivision - Annexation. A parcel being located in the NW%of the SW%of Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a Brass Cap monument marking the northwest corner of said NW '/4 of the SW '/4, from which a Brass Cap monument marking the northeast corner of said NW % of the SW '/4 bears S 89°11'08" E a distance of 1318.58 feet; Thence along the northerly boundary of said NW % of the SW % S 89'11'08" E a distance of 524.92 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said northerly boundary, also being the southerly boundary of Castlebrook Subdivision No. 2 as shown in Book 89 of Plats on Pages 10346 through 10348, records of Ada County, Idaho, S 89°11'08" E a distance of 793.66 feet to a point marking the northeast corner of said NW % of the SW %; Thence along the easterly boundary of said NW% of the SW'/4, also being the westerly boundary of Chesterfield Subdivision No. 1 as shown in Book 96 of Plats on Pages 11924 through 11928, records of Ada County, Idaho, S 0°36'33" W a distance of 418.06 feet to a point; Thence leaving said boundary N 89°21'28" W a distance of 793.90 feet to a point; Thence N 0038'33" E a distance of 420.45 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 7.64 acres and is subject to any easements existing or in use. Clinton W. Hansen, PLS Land Solutions, PC �r1P� LA Np April 12, 2024 S T FR GpL 11118 " 1lf IZk2 s = <1�q 0 F SOP 0� TON W NPR La � � � �� Pivot Pointe Subdivision-Annexation ��-'-Land Surveying and Consulting Jab No.2 of 1 Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT B PROPOSED PIVOT POINTE SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO w w Uf F 0 I m ` 'M" OF BEARING 1/4 W. PINE AVE.— z /1 s 9 a10 - - -- - - -S89'11 08 E 1318.58'- - 6 524.92' POINT OF 793.66' -1317.25' -� BEGINNING PARCEL S1210325410 v � 0 N. BLACK CAT RD. o Y O o0 N g `r ANNEXATION AREA = 7.64 ACRES m PARCEL S1210325555 00 4600 W. QUARTERHORSE LN. 3:: o n z � 0 W. QUARTERHORSE LANE (PRIVATE) N89'21'28"W 793.90' E ONPL LA/VD 5 $TE O O 28La n futions �.4 9TF F �pQ �<v "Land?Surveying and Consulting 0' 100' 200' 400' 231 E.STH ST. TON N� MERIDIAN,ID 83642 w (208)288-2040 (208)288-2557 fax www.landsolufions.biz .JOB N0. 24-07