Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-01-21 Regular City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison (left at 6:17 PM) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted as Amended (Item 18 vacated) CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 1. Approve Minutes of the January 7, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the January 7, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting 3. Biltmore Emergency Access Relinquish of Easement (ESMT-2024-0154) 4. Holiday Inn Express Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2023-0093) 5. Holiday Inn Express Water Main Easement (ESMT-2023-0094) 6. Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2024-0173) 7. Chase Bank - Eagle Amity Water Main Partial Easement Release (ESMT-2024- 0180) 8. TM Center East No. 2 Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0001) 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Foldesi Reserve (H-2024-0055) by Jeff Hatch, located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. 10. Fiscal Year 2025 Net-Zero Budget Amendment in the Amount of $20,000.00 for Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health, Inc. Grant Supporting Park and Pedestrian Improvements within the City of Meridian 11. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $12,000 for Meridian Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Preservation Plan 12. Agreement between the City of Meridian and Endurance Holdings, LLC for Disassembly, Transport and Ownership of Historic Double Silo Barn Components 13. Memorandum of Agreement for Contribution to 2025 Concerts on Broadway Between the Meridian Development Corporation and the City of Meridian 14. Approve and award contract to Dasco of Idaho for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $22,470,000.00 for the Can Ada Lift Station and Gravity Sewer Line project ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] COMMUNITY PRESENTATIONS \[Action Item\] 15. Meridian Life Saving Award - Community Member Recognition PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics ACTION ITEMS 16. Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course Addition 17. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $145,000 for Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Whitlock, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 18. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $2,500,000 for purchase of Ladder Truck Vacated 19. Final Plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision (FP-2024-0020) by David Evans and Associates, Inc., located near the South side of W. Amity Rd., midway between S. Meridian Rd. and S. Linder Rd. Continued to January 28, 2024 Motion to continue to January 28, 2025 made by Councilwoman Little Roberts, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 20. Public Hearing continued from January 7, 2025 for 330 N. Linder Rd. (H-2024- 0048) by Nicholas Rinker, located at 330 N. Linder Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0048 A. Request: Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district to operate a Vehicle Sale or Rental and Service Facility. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener Abstaining: Councilman Taylor 21. Public Hearing for Pine 43 West (CR-2024-0003) by CSGQA, located at Southwest Corner of N. Webb Ave. and E. Fairview Ave. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/CR-2024-0003 A. Request: Council Review of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision for a reduced buffer width from 25ft. to 7ft. adjacent to parking and 10ft. adjacent to the rear of the future single-story building on Pad "A" with a reduced setback of 15ft. Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 22. Public Hearing for Lennon Pointe Subdivision (H-2024-0060) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at SE Corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Ustick Rd. Continued to February 4, 2025 Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0060 A. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 41 single-family/townhome residential building lots, one (1) multi-family residential building lots, one (1) commercial building lot and Seven (7) common lots on 8.80 acres of land in the R-15 and C-C zoning districts with some private streets. Motion to continue to February 4, 2025 made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilman Taylor. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 8:01 PM Meridian City Council January 21, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 19, 2024, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Sonya Allen, Nick Napoli, Jeff Brown, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is January 21 st, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. We will begin this regular City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next item is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you would all, please, rise and join us in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: Next up is our community invocation. We will be joined this evening by Scott Harrop from Rock Harbor Church. Thank you for being here this evening. Harrop: It is certainly our privilege to be here and Mr. Mayor, Council, we are so grateful as a church for what you guys do on a daily basis in making our safe, by helping our city think proactively about what we could and should be doing. We know that your -- your responsibility is not like -- I mean so we are grateful for what you do and, then, just the opportunity that you have to help our city move forward and we thank you as a church, as does everyone. Simison: And if I can -- for those of you that are here if you would like to join us in the community invocation or takes this as a moment of silence and reflection. Harrop: Let's pray. Father, we ask -- we come before you and are so grateful for what you are doing in our community. We thank you for the men and women of this Council Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 2 of 43 who help lead and guide our city and we know that the responsibility that they feel, Lord, is great and we know it's heavy at times and so, Father, our prayer would be that you might strengthen them, that you might give them wisdom, that you might give them discernment to know how to move forward as they come up against situations, Lord, and our hearts would be that you would strengthen them, help them to make the right decisions for us as a community and we are so grateful for what they do and we thank you for the way that you have had your hand upon this city and we ask you to continue to lead and guide us, Father, and we are so grateful for all that you have done for us. We ask these things in your Son's name, amen. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Thank you. Next up is adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Make a couple of quick changes to tonight's proposed agenda. We are going to remove Item 18, a fire budget amendment. There is a couple more elements we need to get dialed in before the budget amendment comes forward. So, let's schedule them for a future City Council meeting and, then, also, Mr. Mayor, we are going to pull item -- I guess we will -- we won't take any action on Item 22. As I understand there is a noticing error -- public noticing error for that particular item and so the Council will not be able to take it up tonight. So, we may take action to continue that to a later point in time when we get to it, but just want to forecast if anyone's here to provide testimony on Lennon Pointe Subdivision that Council won't be able to take any public testimony until it's noticed correctly. Mr. Mayor, with those two changes I move that we would adopt the agenda as amended. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt agenda as amended. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and agenda is adopted as amended. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Approve Minutes of the January 7, 2025 City Council Work Session 2. Approve Minutes of the January 7, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 3 of 43 3. Biltmore Emergency Access Relinquish of Easement (ESMT-2024- 0154) 4. Holiday Inn Express Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2023-0093) 5. Holiday Inn Express Water Main Easement (ESMT-2023-0094) 6. Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT- 2024-0173) 7. Chase Bank - Eagle Amity Water Main Partial Easement Release (ESMT-2024-0180) 8. TM Center East No. 2 Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0001) 9. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Foldesi Reserve (H-2024- 0055) by Jeff Hatch, located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. 10. Fiscal Year 2025 Net-Zero Budget Amendment in the Amount of $20,000.00 for Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health, Inc. Grant Supporting Park and Pedestrian Improvements within the City of Meridian 11. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of $12,000 for Meridian Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Preservation Plan 12. Agreement between the City of Meridian and Endurance Holdings, LLC for Disassembly, Transport and Ownership of Historic Double Silo Barn Components 13. Memorandum of Agreement for Contribution to 2025 Concerts on Broadway Between the Meridian Development Corporation and the City of Meridian 14. Approve and award contract to Dasco of Idaho for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $22,470,000.00 for the Can Ada Lift Station and Gravity Sewer Line project Simison: First up is the Consent Agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 4 of 43 Cavener: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda as presented, for the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were are no items from the Consent Agenda. COMMUNITY PRESENTATIONS [Action Item] 15. Meridian Life Saving Award - Community Member Recognition Simison: So, we will move on to Item 15, community presentations, which is a Meridian life saving award and turn this over to Chief Blume. Blume: Good evening, Mayor, Members of Council. On the rare occurrence that a member of this community -- this Meridian community steps in and intervenes and provides emergency care that definitively saved another person's life in this Meridian community, we felt it incumbent to begin to recognize those -- those contributions to this community and our community members. So, in light of that I would like to invite up Pam Garcia and her family and we would like to talk with you and explain to you the incident that she found herself and the actions that she took. Hendrick: Good evening, Mayor and Council. My name is J.D. Hendrick, the division chief of EMS and tonight I am honored to present Pam Garcia with a community life saving award. I'm going to read the write-up real quick and -- and then -- yeah. So, on the evening of July 27, 2024, a female motorcycle rider collided with a car near the intersection of Meridian Road and Chinden. Both the motorcycle and passenger car sustained major damage. The motorcyclist was ejected off the bike and was lying on the road unconscious and without pulses. Thanks to some quick actions by a bystander who was an off-duty nurse she quickly determined that CPR to take -- quickly determined CPR needed to take place and started CPR. Thanks to her quick actions upon arrival the fire department paramedics determined the patient was breathing normal and was starting to wake up. The patient sustained massive bodily trauma and was urgently transported to St. Alphonsus Medical Center. After weeks of rehab and multiple surgeries we are pleased to say that the patient was discharged home and is doing well. Although we are not able to have the patient here with us tonight we wanted to recognize the nurse that went out of her way to save a life and so with that we want to present a life-saving award to Pam Garcia in recognition for her life-saving efforts Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 5 of 43 provided on the evening of July 27, 2024. Your actions, courage and dedication saved a life. Congratulations. Garcia: Truly an honor and I feel anybody in this room would have done the same thing if you were in that position. Very thankful she is okay and she was able to recover. We all would do it every day without this recognition, so -- thank you. Simison: Thank you, Pam. You and Mike have been a blessing to this community in more ways than one that -- as many people are aware of your dedication and commitment, but thank you for that and, chief appreciate you bringing that forward. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Simison: Mr. Clerk, do we have anyone signed up under public forum? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we do not. ACTION ITEMS 16. Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course Addition Simison: Okay. So, with that we will move on to Action Items. First item up is Item 16, which is Discovery Park ninja warrior course addition. We will be hearing from Mr. Barton on this topic. Barton: Good afternoon -- actually, good evening, Mayor and Council Members. I'm here this evening to talk to you about adding an awesome amenity to Discovery Park. Over the last probably six months the Plimmer family and Abey Louie. The Plimmers are here and Abbey Louie is here as well and so this is -- their -- their daughter Eva has a life-threatening disease and she absolutely loves ninja warriors. So, the family approached us to get a ninja course to one of our parks and we have a spot in Discovery Park that would -- this would be awesome and fit -- fit very well in. So, over the last few months we have been working with the family -- Chris, can you advance that, please? Thanks. So -- yeah. So, terrific opportunity. We have gone through the design process. This is an amenity that really is appealing to that hard-to-serve group of kids that are -- you know, we call them -- we call them tweens. They are kind of in between the kid and the teenager and so it's 13 plus, but it's an amenity for really all ages, small kids and adults, and so you can see the placement of it in Discovery Park, the shaded area that's in the backdrop is phase one and this is the recently completed phase two where we have a teen area, we have some softball diamonds. We also have an active area that orientates very well to the playground. There is a four yard dash there that kind of adds to that whole area. That's a blow up of where it would go. The equipment itself -- there is a really cool video if you get some time and you want to look at it. It doesn't play well on Zoom, but it shows how active it is engaging from people of all ages and really people of all abilities, too, which is supper cool. You can see how it lays out. The equipment as shown would be what we are putting in, as well as the Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 6 of 43 artificial grass that goes underneath it. So, in regards to maintenance there -- it's super low maintenance, very durable equipment. No need for any additional staffing for this. So, the funding that I think the next item is a budget amendment. The Plimmers have raised -- they have about 185,000 dollars through donations that have been made available to go towards this project. There is a 20,000 dollar Blue Cross grant that was just approved of the Consent Agenda that we would like to apply to this as well. So, we are asking for a budget amendment 145,000 dollars to help bridge the gap between the total project cost and the funds that have been raised in the grant amount. So, with that I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you, Mike. If I could just add, I think that there is an opportunity for some donated services that could even offset that down a little bit lower if possible. Barton: Yeah. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. That's -- that's true. I mean we -- we will -- there is some contractor groups that want to -- want to step up and possibly contribute. We don't want to say to you that that's a for sure thing, because we don't know it is, but they have shown a strong interest in that. Yeah, we go through the right -- the proper channels of insurance and Public Works contracts and stuff like that to get that. But, yeah, there is several groups -- in fact, Eva's father is a contractor that could possibly do the excavation and, then, we have a landscape company that could do some ground repair. So, it's our hope that we don't use that entire amount, but if it doesn't pan out we have it and we can execute the project. Simison: Thank you. Council, questions? Comments? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks, Mike, for bringing this. I don't think I have ever looked more forward to a budget amendment in my entire time on Council. So, I appreciate you bringing this forth tonight. Barton: Thank you. And I don't think we have ever had 50 people for a budget amendment either, so -- Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Mike, this looks like a pretty amazing addition to Discovery Park and I think it fills a nitch that we missed. We -- we thought that was the park that had something for everyone, but now I know we do. So, thank you for bringing this forward. Barton: Thank you. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 7 of 43 Simison: And before we get to the next item I just want to -- I want to give a shout out to -- I know it's a lot more than yourself, but you have kind of really born a lot of this -- working with this and you now consider yourself for professional fundraising and available for any and all activities, but this -- having people from the community step up to help make this a reality and having a -- I will take a friend like you any day to help make something a reality. So, I just want to say thank you to you. 17. Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of$145,000 for Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course Simison: So, with that we will move on to Item 17, which is fiscal year 2025 budget amendment in the amount of 145,000 for Discovery Park ninja warrior course. Do I have a motion? Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: I move we approve Item No. 17, fiscal year 2025 budget amendment in the amount of 145,000 for Discovery Park ninja warrior court. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Item No. 17. Is there discussion on the motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Brief comment. Now we will start thanking you. You helped to really elevate this project and we talk a lot up here about more amenities in our parks and certainly this is that. This one means a little bit more and I want to thank you for elevating this. I think we would be amiss if we didn't thank the Blue Cross Foundation for their generosity as well. Our parks department; right? We get a great idea, we forward something to you and guys mobilize quickly and my appreciation for that can't be said enough. But, man, we got to thank our community. You know, people talk about Meridian gets too big and you lose that sense of community and I say nay, nay. When you see a night like tonight where our community comes together as they support each other. We got any kids in here from Compass? Got some aviators in the room? Yeah, I see those shirts. I love the aviators. I have an eight year old who came home and told me about a fundraiser at Compass and I had to race him on the Ninja Warrior course. Spoiler alert. I didn't do very well. So, I'm excited about this, because now I have got an opportunity for some more practice. To the Plimmer family, thank you for -- for being a light and encouragement in our community. We need more people like this in our community and I just -- I said this earlier, I can't think -- I don't think I have ever been Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 8 of 43 excited for a budget amendment and I'm ecstatic about this one, so to everyone who helped make this project bring to reality, thank you. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Two comments. Number one, I would like to know if there is still opportunities to raise money if there is links or donations to -- to share that with the community I would be very interested. I was not aware of this effort beforehand. I still think if there is time to find money within the community and people that would like to participate, I know I would like to participate and feel a sense of ownership, so that I think there is a lot of other people that want to. So, if that information can be shared later I appreciate it. The second thing would be just for the record anybody on Council that can complete the course I will buy you lunch. Simison: Is there further discussion on the motion? If not, clerk will call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: I don't get to vote, but aye. All ayes. Motion carries and the amendment is agreed to and we look forward to moving this forward as quickly as we can. Everyone that echoed Councilman Cavener's comments, you thanked the Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation. We really appreciate what they do to help make it easy for -- to give money to help us put towards the project to make sense and is what -- you checked all the boxes and in my opinion helped us get over the finish line with the use, so appreciate moving forward. MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES. Simison: So, with that I'm going to go. Could I leave this with you, Councilman Cavener, as I go to another community tradition with the speaker competition in Mountain View, so -- Cavener: Terrific. Simison: -- enjoy the meeting. 19. Final Plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision (FP-2024-0020) by David Evans and Associates, Inc., located near the South side of W. Amity Rd., midway between S. Meridian Rd. and S. Linder Rd. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. All right. With that that concludes our -- I guess basic actions items. We move on to our public hearings, which is going to be Item 19, final plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision and before I turn it over to staff, yes, folks, unless Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 9 of 43 you want to stay for public hearings of land use -- you don't have to. You are allowed to go, but if you want the stay everyone is welcome and we -- with that we wish you a great evening. With that I will turn it over to staff. Allen: Members of the Council, the first application before you tonight is a request for a final plat. This site consists of 16.06 acres of land. It's zoned R-4 and R-8 and it's located on the south side of West Amity Road, midway between South Meridian Road and South Linder Road. The preliminary plat for this property was approved in 2023. A final plat consisting of two building lots on 16.06 acres in the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts is proposed. This is the first phase of Stonehill Crossing Subdivision. The preliminary plat included a condition for a local public street to be provided off of South Oakbriar Way between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, for access to these lots, instead of a direct access to the collector street. Just a side note here. This is where the church is going on Lot 1. This is an existing residential property on Lot 2 here. The street was required to extend at a minimum to the east boundary of Lot 2, Block 1, and, then, extend to the south with future redevelopment of Lot 3, Block 1. Based on the city's requirement ACHD also included conditions that required a local street to be constructed between these two lots and extend to the site's east property line. Since that time ACHD has determined they will not allow a local street in this location. After much discussion with ACHD on this matter Council approval of a change to the access in this location is requested to allow a private driveway access via South Oakbriar Way on Lot 1, Block 1, with a temporary ingress-egress easement to Lot 2, Block 1. When an alternate access is available for Lot 2 the development of Lot 3, Block 1, the access easement should terminate and the access should be provided internally via a local public street. Other than that the proposed final plan is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required. These typically do not go before City Council, but because of this -- this situation staff felt it was important for Council to review the change and approve it if they deem appropriate. Thank you. Cavener: Thanks, Sonya. Council, any questions for staff? Seeing none, is the applicant present? Good evening. Welcome to the Meridian City Council meeting. Please give us your name and address and the time is yours. Appleby: Okay. My name is Bryan Appleby. I'm an engineer with David Evans and Associate in Boise. Address is 9175 West Black Eagle Drive in Boise and I'm here with the property owner of that existing residence Kent Mills and as far as that condition for -- well, jump back a little bit. With that private driveway to the church -- and this is for Stonehill Church if you haven't figured that out. We are providing a cross-access easement and a new driveway that serve Mr. Mills' property. A condition was written up -- this would be a temporary access. For several reasons, including Mr. Mills' desire, we were hoping that this could become a permanent driveway and not -- he does not want his property to be served from the east upon further development. One of the reasons is that there is a six and a half foot grade difference between the bare land directly to the east of his property and his existing driveway. There is also -- where -- is it shown here? Okay. So, this is a -- just more overall look at the overall property. The area that's -- if you can see this. So, we got a new -- new collector road that goes north- Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 10 of 43 south between Amity Road and the southern boundary and, then, the -- the private driveway that's east-west serving the church property and, then, the two lots are the -- the church property and Mr. Mills' residence right here. As it's written currently this access here labeled temporary would have to go away upon future development of the property surrounding these two lots. What you are seeing here is a preliminary plat that's being developed by Trilogy Development and so our -- our request is that this access point to the east, labeled future, would be considered -- or would not be mandated on Mr. Mills -- on his property, but that this temporary access here could be made permanent. Put in the next slide here. There is a better view. Johnson: Sorry to interrupt. Can you pull the microphone closer to you? Appleby: Okay. Cavener: If you could pull the microphone -- our microphones are all way sensitive, so you almost need to eat the mike just so if there is anybody watching online that they can hear you and -- and those in the audience. Appleby: I did share a new slide yesterday. I did. Are you able to get this on the screen or is it not -- okay. While they are bringing that up, current condition number ten states that the ingress-egress easement depicted on Lot 1 , Block 1, for the benefit of Lot 2, Block 1, shall be temporary until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of the adjacent property. At such time the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 via Lot 1 shall be removed. And once we get that slide it will be a little -- little more clear what we are discussing here. But, again, this temporary access we were hoping to at least be given the option to make that a permanent access. So where my cursor is on the screen is the -- the garage of the existing home and the driveway currently goes towards this new intersection, so we are proposing to realign it right here. I think the biggest challenge engineering wise is just the slope between the adjacent property and Mr. Mills' driveway. It's about a six and a half foot drop. Cavener: Okay. Our clerk is trying to get that pulled up. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Yes, Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Mind if I just ask a question that I'm going to ask at some point really quick of the applicant. The -- the grade, it's a six foot drop over what length? What's the distance we are talking about? And, then, how much per foot would you be ascending or descending approximately? Appleby: I don't have the -- the length listed here, but I calculated it at an eight percent grade. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 11 of 43 Taylor: An eight percent grade? Appleby: Eight percent. Cavener: Okay. Are we able to pull up the exhibit? Appleby: Okay. Here it is. Cavener: Okay. Great. Appleby: See the aerial photo of Mr. Mills' residence. This is the primary driveway currently. We are proposing to realign it here and the conditions allow for this as a temporary access via a cross-access easement. This is the private driveway that would be -- one of the private driveways serving the church. This section of the driveway is actually going to be constructed at a public street width, a full width. Cavener: Sure. Appleby: So, it will look and act like a public road up until at this point here. This -- this grade section here is approximately the -- the alternate location that is discussed in this Condition 10. Again it's about an eight percent grade, six and a half foot drop. The less -- much less direct route to the existing garage, which is right here, and Mr. Mills prefers this location. I agree that it's -- it's a more direct route to his driveway and garage. Seems like it's a fitting solution for a permanent driveway to serve his property. You want to state your name and -- Mills: Yeah. My name is Kent Mills. The address is 799 West Amity Road. There will -- it will take some doing just to put in the temporary driveway. We will need to pour concrete and to do that -- and, then, to come and do it all over again and put it in at an access point that's -- that's not even -- I mean it's not a decent access point. That's just a round turn around that -- that goes -- there is a -- there is a covered area there and I don't want to have to build driveways twice to -- anyway. It just makes a lot more sense, rather than having it be temporary, to have it be permanent. Cavener: Okay. Does that conclude your presentation? If so, I would like to give Council an opportunity if they have questions. Appleby: Again, we are agreeable to all the conditions, except for this one. We would like that -- that red hatched area, which is the cross-access easement to be considered a permanent -- or at least Mr. Mills to be given the option to make that a permanent easement versus being forced into relocating his driveway in the future. Cavener: Thank you. Council, questions? Overton: Mr. President? Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 12 of 43 Cavener: Council Member Overton. Overton: I realize just a short time ago we had a room full of ACHD. Do we happen to have ACHD on the line? Because when I look at this the first thing I try to figure out what ACHD is thinking about is that quite possibly they are trying to align the future roadway with the eventual redevelopment of this lot, that if it redevelops into smaller home sites they are going to want it to attach into a similar development instead of out onto that roadway, but I would sure love to hear what ACHD has to say. If they are online. Cavener: Council Member Overton, I do see somebody listed on Zoom representing ACHD. If they are able to comment perhaps they could raise their hand and our clerk will bring them into the conversation for a question from Council Member Overton. Johnson: Council President Cavener, they have the ability to unmute at this time. Cavener: Okay. Meg, I don't know if you can hear us, but if you have some thoughts or feedback to Council Member Overton's question we need you to unmute your microphone and we would love to hear from you. Recognizing that Meg has not unmuted I think perhaps Council Member Overton we may come back to this, but at least open the door for other Council Members if they have other questions and -- oh, it looks like Meg has unmuted. Meg, can you hear us? And now you are muted again. -- I -- Johnson: Councilman Cavener, that was me. Cavener: That was you. Okay. Well, then, Council, if there are other questions we will try and circle back with ACHD here in a minute if they have an opportunity to respond. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Cavener: So, if I missed this information I apologize, but the -- the church -- or what was their feedback on this change? Did they have any concerns with your suggested change or were they amenable to that? Appleby: They are amendable to that. The pastor is here to speak -- yes, the pastor is here and he -- they agree that this -- this driveway access as it's temporary -- considered temporary now, but they are open to it being a permanent access. Taylor: Mr. President, quick follow up. Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 13 of 43 Taylor: This maybe is a question for staff. So, you have indicated to the applicant that that portion of it is treated as a public street or that this designed it. But is it a private road or is it a public road in any way? And I don't know if you can answer it or if Sonya can. Appleby: Private driveway. But the first -- the first -- I don't know -- maybe -- I'm just guessing -- about 200 feet of it is built to a public street width and standards and, then, it -- and, then, it narrows down to more of a driveway -- typical driveway. Mills: But just for clarification, it's -- the moment that you turn off of Oak Way it is a private drive regardless of the specifics that it's built to. Appleby: Private driveway. It's not considered a private street. Taylor: Thank you. Appleby: It's on the church property. Strader: Council President Cavener? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: Thank you. Just a question. If you could go back to the other slide that had like the layout with the future phases. Thank you. So, I think the -- the one question I had was just -- if that street connection does not occur as it had been planned previously; right? So, if you take access off of the private drive instead, is this going to become like a hammerhead turnaround over here next to these -- I'm just looking at like Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3. 1 think this is like your last phase of homes, but what -- what would be there instead? Appleby: So, Trilogy Development and their engineer -- excuse me -- showed this stub road here just because of this condition. Strader: Right. Appleby: They would probably terminate it short of Mr. Mills' lot if this was -- if this access became permanent. They were just trying to accommodate the conditions as they currently are written. Is this where you are -- Strader: Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. Right. Exactly. Yeah. I was just curious if that would become like a hammerhead turnaround for vehicles, if -- if they would still extend that or -- Appleby: I would imagine they would terminate it at the end of Lot 2. Strader: Okay. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 14 of 43 Appleby: It would be more of a hammerhead turnaround. Strader: Got it. Okay. That -- that makes sense to me. Appleby: I did want to point out that all the surrounding land and the roads you will see is planned by Trilogy. They have access to -- to Amity Road here further to the east. Would come, you know, into the subdivision here with a connection here to this collector street and there is a future roundabout proposed here. So, connectivity wise when this is built out the residents here will have options to -- to exit their neighborhood via the collector road. They could head east and out to Amity this way and, then, this arrow here shows a future driveway access from the church to that -- that same road. So, we have a third access. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Little Roberts: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I have a question that I think maybe better directed at Bill or either -- either one of you. As -- did I hear that it would be a permanent easement on a private road. Do we have the authority to do that? Nary: Mr. Mayor -- Mr. President, Members of the Council, Council Member Little Roberts, yeah, we can -- we certainly can direct that as part of the final plat. That's fine. Little Roberts: Okay. Thank you. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? All right. Sonya. Please. Allen: Thank you, Councilman Cavener. Just a -- just a couple of thoughts here. I would caution against approving a permanent easement to this lot for future redevelopment of this lot. If at some 40 years down the road this resident no longer lives there and the -- and the home is demolished for some reason and this lot redevelops, we would not want access to be permanent from that driveway. With a future plat -- I mean if you guys wanted to approve an easement, you know, for a certain time period until say redevelopment of that lot, then, we could -- in the future when that Lot 3 that's shown on the preliminary plat develops we could require a common driveway to that property or -- or some other access to the property. Cavener: Yeah. So -- so, Sonya, I think -- you are tracking at least where I'm at and I guess that's my question is trying to understand what the need is for -- for a permanent as opposed to temporary? Mills: I'm not sure -- I'm not sure even why it's being called -- called an easement, because it's all on my property. It wouldn't be an easement. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 15 of 43 Appleby: It's the access through their lot. Mills: Well, this is the easement, not -- not the driveway. Appleby: Correct. Mills: I see. Appleby: So, my response is that just the way the condition is written that until such time as an alternate access is available -- at that time this easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 via Lot 1 shall be removed. Cavener: So, if I -- Appleby: No flexibility on the wording. Cavener: And I appreciate it. So, I think -- I'm not the smartest guy up here, so we got to kind of dumb it down for my level. What you are essentially requesting is -- is a temporary easement until you redevelop your property -- until you sell your property or move away; is that correct? Mills: Right now all that's left -- right now all that's left is the house on an acre and a half and that's what was inside the sprinkler system, so nothing's changing. I mean we just sold off the -- the property around the house. Appleby: You have no plans to redevelop the -- Mills: Yeah. We are not planning to redevelop it -- or to develop it at all. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? All right. If you just want to grab a seat. Mr. Johnson, do we have anybody signed up to testify in this application? Johnson: Mr. Council President, it's not a public hearing. Cavener: Oh. It's not public hearing. Thank you, Mr. Clerk, for holding me accountable. Council, questions? Deliberation? Any additional questions for our staff? Sonya, I do. I guess I have a question. This -- we have got a condition that staff has brought forth. I assume that was presented to the applicant. Did the applicant voice concern prior to this evening. This ball's bouncing a little all over the place for me tonight and maybe it's because we had a lengthy joint meeting. I'm just trying to -- to follow what's necessary being maybe requested to us from the applicant that's different than maybe what the initial request was. Allen: Yes. Councilman Cavener, Council, I wasn't aware of them not being in agreement with it, but I have been out of the office the last couple days, so I am playing catch up. That's why I didn't have the slide that he asked for so -- Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 16 of 43 Cavener: I'm going to just check again then. Meg McCarthy with ACHD, are you able to hear us and, if so, could you raise your hand? Our City Council have a couple of questions for you. And, Mr. Johnson, I don't know if you hit mute or if somebody else did. Johnson: I hit the button to unmute. Cavener: Okay. And, Council Member Overton, I'm trying to coordinate with a couple of folks from ACHD to see if they could reach out to Meg and it does not appear that it's -- the messages are landing quite yet. Allen: Maybe she could call in on her phone. Cavener: Yeah. Allen: Never mind. Cavener: Well, Council, a motion is always in order there. To me there is -- there is a couple of questions that still remain about this and -- and I do think it is imperative that we do hear from the highway district. I appreciate the desire to -- to maybe take an action tonight. I -- I do not like continuances when they can be avoided, particularly for something like this, but in light of maybe a lack of information perhaps a continuance may be in order. They don't know if anyone has a strong opinion one way or another. Certainly this new information that's coming before us this evening, different from what we have seen in the staff report, does make it a little bit more challenging. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Just maybe to share some comments on -- on this. I agree with you, I'm a little bit confused as to the right way to proceed given the kind of application this is. Would -- would think hearing from ACHD would be important. I would note, though, that an eight percent grade over what -- I can't tell the exact footage, but I can tell it's a very short -- I mean that's -- that's a pretty steep grade. So, imagine coming in, if you had a trailer to go up an eight percent grade what that would do just potentially. I'm just thinking through some different scenarios, though, if you had, you know, something like that. I think there is some things that we might want to think through a little bit as we consider what -- what we have here. Now, I know that the -- the applicant has no intention of selling or redeveloping, but we are also trying to make smart land use decisions for the next several decades about how -- how things look. So, I do think it's important to understand kind of the -- the -- the map and the plan from ACHD and kind of what we are allowed to do. Given this is not a public hearing, it seems to me it would be reasonable to gather more information I think that all the Council would benefit from and come back and discuss that. I know the applicant's here and we would like to kind of Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 17 of 43 make a decision, but I feel a little confused as to what the right thing to do is at this point. Cavener: And, Council Member Taylor, I think to that point to not have maybe our -- our subject matter expert from a transportation perspective here to give us some -- some guidance, it does make it a little more challenging. Meg, I'm going to try to check in with you one more time to see if you can hear us and if you can hear this -- my voice and just raise your hand using the raise your hand feature with Zoom -- not seeing any response. Council, what's your -- what's your action, if any? Little Roberts: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. President, I would prefer to wait until we had information from ACHD. I think that's the most prudent move at this point, especially since it's not a public hearing. Cavener: Okay. Just for the record -- Allen: Mr. President, excuse me. Cavener: Because we -- sorry. Go ahead, Sonya. Allen: If I may, is -- would you mind sharing with me the -- the question or concern you might have that you want to discuss with ACHD and possibly I could help? Cavener: Well -- and I -- I think it may be various questions from the Council. For me it is the -- the nature of a permanent access off of a private drive that to me, when I -- when that property will redevelop at some point what I'm trying to avoid -- and I can't speak for the rest of the body -- is dropping traffic from that redeveloped parcel with a future residence is listed onto that private drive and, then, on to -- on to Oakbriar. So, where some of the changes came as a request of the highway district, I -- and -- and this is a change different from what they have brought forth, I do think it's appropriate for us to at least seek their feedback before we render a decision, so that the applicant, then, doesn't have to come forth back again if the highway district is not supportive, so -- Allen: Yeah. ACHD doesn't -- you know, they don't -- ACHD doesn't govern access on a -- on a private -- on a driveway or a private street, it's just -- just public streets and -- yeah. We had this worked out with the preliminary plat and, then, it -- and it seems ACHD changed their mind. So, that's why we are -- we are here tonight, but -- but, yeah, that's certainly your purview to wait and talk to them directly, but -- Taylor: Mr. President? Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 18 of 43 Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Just to note, too, we have recently had some discussion with our frustrations with private drives and access and what that means with causing problems unforeseen down the road. So, I do think it's appropriate to understand what's ACHD's -- why the change and kind of some of the dynamics. Cavener: Okay. Council Member Little Roberts, did you make a motion? I -- I -- I didn't know if you were -- you were suggesting you would or if that was a formal motion. So, you will have to forgive me. Little Roberts: Mr. President, I did not make a motion, but I would be happy to. Mr. President, I move that we continue this discussion at a future date when we -- when we know we have access to ACHD. Cavener: Got a motion. Do I have a second? Overton: Second. Cavener: Motion and a second. Discussion. So, I would maybe just suggest -- sorry. realize I called for discussion then piped in. I do think in fairness to the applicant, because this is a land use side that we would need to continue it likely to a date certain, so that we could -- a specific date, so that we could also flag for the highway district that we would want their -- their feedback. I -- I think even if we were to do it for next week I think that would be -- be appropriate. So, if that's what the maker of the motion was intending -- Little Roberts: That is my intent. Cavener: And does the second agree? Overton: Second agrees. Cavener: All right. We got a motion and a second. Any future discussion? All right. Motion is to continue Item 19 to next Tuesday. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? Okay. The Council President is aye as well and we will continue this item to next Wednesday. And, Sonya, if you wouldn't mind reaching out to our friends at the highway district make sure they have had a chance to review this and maybe be present if we have some questions for them next week. Thank you. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 20. Public Hearing continued from January 7, 2025 for 330 N. Linder Rd. (H-2024-0048) by Nicholas Rinker, located at 330 N. Linder Rd. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 19 of 43 A. Request: Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district to operate a Vehicle Sale or Rental and Service Facility. Cavener: Next up on our agenda is Item 20, Application H-2024-0048. We will begin this public hearing with staff comments. Napoli: Good evening, Council. So, this is a continuance from about the 7th -- January 7th regarding the 330 North Linder Road property. I did provide an overlay for you guys where I put the site plan from the property to the south, the middle one right here with the highlighted yellow is the subject property. So, he will be sharing this cross-access from the property to the south coming up through this shared drive. It will be a cross- access easement here. And I did talk with the applicant. We did have some discussions about several options -- about cross-access, because that was really why we continued the hearing, whether it was going to be an easement or a stub and having some discussions with him -- he is actually present here tonight and he does want to have a further discussion with you guys, so he does have a presentation on some options. However, he did provide an example of a stub on the front side of his property to the north for the redevelopment when the property to the north redevelops. Something I did want to just show an overview of this area. So, his subject property is 330, 370 is the county property to the north of him, and, then, to the north of that is an existing daycare in an L-O zone. They actually do have a stub to the property to the north of him, which is right here, right in line with the house as well, which is where keeping the existing house does become a little bit difficult with redevelopment of properties, because ideally lining them up would be a perfect world, but, then, it doesn't always happen like that. So, as far as with this, they will most likely have -- or they will have a shared access between these -- his property and the northern property, but they will most likely use the access from the daycare site to get into this site in the future, similarly to like, you know, what this property owner is doing with his property to the south. So, reducing, essentially, four curb cuts into two. And, then, at this point I will stand for any questions. Cavener: Thanks, Nick. Council, any questions? Seeing none, would the applicant like to come forward. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Just --just of note, I will be recusing myself from a vote on this application. Cavener: Thank you, Council Member Taylor. That was consistent with the previous item when we heard this. Council Member Overton? Overton: Just for the record I wasn't here on January 7th, but I have had a chance to review all the testimony from the 7th and I will be able to take action here tonight. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 20 of 43 Cavener: Great. Thank you, Council Member Overton. Good evening. Welcome to City Council. If you could, please, give your name and address and the time is yours, sir. Rinker: Yeah. Good evening, Council. My name is Nick Rinker. My -- this one? Cavener: Yeah. Just -- if you could eat the mic. It's -- so, in case someone is watching remotely they can hear you. Rinker: My home address is 385 West Creek View Drive in Meridian. Yes. So, I -- oops. Sorry. I just wanted the opportunity to kind of show you guys what I see here. I -- I'm totally, you know, open to working with you, you know, however we have to. I'm not a professional at this, I'm just a property owner trying to, you know, open a business and kind of do something good for my family. So, looking at these four properties -- it's kind of cut -- it's kind of cut off on my screen, so I'm just -- I made -- and -- and, again, forgive my crude drawings, I was just trying to be able to visualize this in a bunch of different options -- all the options without spending a whole bunch of money on -- on drawings. So, this kind of shows the two accesses that go to the four properties in question here and they are both lined up with drives that are across Linder how ACHD wants them to be. This is just kind of a rough idea that -- this Nick sent me of kind of three places that would be possible to stub out and so, you know, being really familiar with the property and -- and what my plan is on the property or what my -- my hope is on the property, I'm just trying really hard to make sense of either one of these and so I kind of drew again awful drawings, but I drew a couple of -- like the one at the back -- way back there, obviously, is a little odd looking on a map. Also not ideal with these houses here. This is I think the one that kind of could potentially make some sense, but at the same time where we have this access at 440 where it's shared and already stubbed out dumping right into this house, you know, this -- I don't see a way that this is going to connect until this house at 370 is gone and, again, they do have an agreement -- a cross-access agreement between 444 and 370. You know, those two that are approved -- this one up here does exist. This one down here is approved and in progress. Those two do line up perfectly. So, at some point in the future when, you know, this house is gone, my property redeveloped someday, you know, this straight access, obviously, would be ideal in the long run. So, moving forward -- so, this is -- this is the property line right here, this cement wall between my property and 370. It's about 32 inches higher and it's, as you can see, just a drop off in one spot. So, again, not ideal. This -- this is the most up-to-date picture of -- this is just for reference. This is 300 and, then, right here is the cross-access that is stubbed out already from 444 to 370 and as you -- you can see on this side of 370 that that is a lot more gradual than from my property to the other. So, I mean, like I said, I'm not a professional developer, I don't -- I just -- I just want to do what makes the most sense for everyone. But I mean the way I kind of see it right now is like no matter what I'm relinquishing with -- with my site plan I'm relinquishing my direct access to Linder, which ACHD -- they propose that I line up my drive directly onto my property with this drive. Can you see my mouse? And so, you know, in the spirit of trying to make this make sense for everyone, relinquishing any direct access to Linder and sharing with this cross-access over to the south of me in my Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 21 of 43 mind -- now I mean I'm happy to hear what -- what you all have to say, but in my mind we have four properties here. No matter how this ends up there are going to be two accesses to the four properties, so -- I don't know. Mine is also pretty low traffic. ACHD's report I think said 24 -- 24 entrances per day or however they measure that, so -- yeah. That's -- that's my presentation. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Rinker. Council, any questions? Maybe if -- I -- I -- I guess I have one maybe to start. Rinker: Yeah. Cavener: So, Mr. Rinker, appreciate you being here. Recognize you were caught up with some air traffic or road traffic last time, so happy to get the continuance to let you come here before us. The -- the main reason that I recall for the continuance was because it had been shared with us that you were opposed to a cross-access to the north. In -- in your presentation tonight it sounds like that you are amenable to a cross- access to the north, it's more about identifying the location and -- did I follow your presentation correctly? Rinker: Not that part of it. I mean my -- kind of my thought process on it was that an easement would in the long run make more sense for -- you know, let me go back here. When, you know, this house is out of the picture -- this house is out of the picture, so like if you are saying that I propose to stub it out this way and keep the house, I mean that's -- that is an option, but the only thing that is effectively going to do right now is just get rid of my -- my display spaces that are right there, if that makes sense, for -- you know what I mean? Cavener: Unfortunately, I -- I -- I guess I -- I don't and I -- I recognize you have got a specific use and -- and your -- your colleague that was here earlier in the month, you know, voiced some concern about some of your security and I guess, Mr. Rinker, here is -- here is the part where I'm -- I'm confused. I'm trying to work through it. Maybe you can help me. If I recall correctly, your customers will take access to your business via cross-access to the south; correct? Rinker: Yes. Cavener: Your -- your business will benefit because of a previous annexation with a cross-access agreement. So, I scratch my head when you say what benefits your business you are not willing to do for the -- your next neighbor along the way and being frank I struggle with that and so help me understand why your neighbor to the -- to the north should not be afforded the same benefit that you yourself are receiving from your neighbor to the south. Rinker: Sure. Well, from my perspective they -- they have that from their neighbor to the north; right? Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 22 of 43 Cavener: Sure. Rinker: Okay. So -- Cavener: And I'm not looking to -- to go back and forth, but, you know, our -- our goal as -- as a City Council is to look at what is beneficial to our community long term and we recognize as an entrepreneur you are looking at very granular at your business -- how your business functions and we appreciate -- we try to be very understanding of that, but we look at, you know, not how your business functions, but the use, the traffic and we look at it long term and we certainly see challenges when a -- 30 years from now somebody needs to get from one business to the next business on -- that -- that are adjacent to Linder Road, we don't want them accessing Linder Road, we want them to use these cross-access agreements -- Rinker: Okay. Cavener: -- and so what -- what -- to put it in kind of a way that I would understand, you -- you almost are bottlenecking cross-access along Linder Road, because you are saying, hey, they have got it over here, they have got it over here, so I don't need to comply and from a --just as one city council's perspective, I don't think that's in line with trying to connect businesses together along with -- I think will be especially with -- with an -- with an overpass being built near you, a very very busy intersection, a very very busy road. Rinker: Yeah. Cavener: So, I -- I want to be up front. I was -- I tried to be real candid with your colleague. I'm not supportive of waving the cross-access from my perspective, because I -- I just -- I can't see the nexus and where it makes sense. That's what's great about the City Council is that there is six of us this evening and we make a decision as a body, but I just -- I am at a spot that I don't think that I can be supportive of waiving your request for a cross-access this evening. Rinker: Okay. Strader: Council President Cavener. Cavener: Council Member Taylor -- council -- Strader: We are twins. Thank you, sir. So, just to be candid and in the spirit of like moving this forward, so I'm in a very similar place. I feel strongly that cross-access is needed. I am flexible as the location of the cross-access. Out of the locations that you identified which one is best for you? Rinker: So, lining it up with the house to where they are all in line -- and I'm -- I'm not -- so, just -- just to be clear, I wasn't -- like my goal is not to have cross-access waived Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 23 of 43 altogether. Maybe my terminology is -- is just wrong. My point is stubbing it now versus an easement -- like with my house there -- while my house is there or the house is on that property, so if I -- I can stub it, I can pave on both sides of the house; right? But for the time being until that house and the house to the north are demolished and that cross -- cross-access actually connects -- and the way I see it is it's just kind of some pavement that's going to be there anyways, but that I can't use for vehicle display. Maybe I'm not understanding this properly. Cavener: And I think you are. We recognize -- and I -- I appreciate this is a good thing for Council, you are not a -- a developer not doing these projects all over the -- the country. You are an entrepreneur trying to do something for your business and so -- but, certainly, why we foster and encourage good collaboration with our staff around this and I guess maybe to that point I would like to at least get some feedback from staff, because I'm -- I'm not quite sure if -- if a cross-access in front of the house would be approved by ACHD and -- and I hear where you come from, you don't want to have to do this until your house and that house are demolished, but, candidly, the -- the thought of both of those being demolished at the same time for something larger, when you are already annexed in the city, is likely not going to happen, which is why the Council has to make some of these hard decisions about what is best long term, because if we are relying on two neighbors to redevelop at the same time after they have already been annexed into the city it's unlikely. So, I want to give staff at least an opportunity to weigh in about locations of cross-access or stub, just so the Council can be on the same page. Rinker: Okay. Cavener: Nick, any feedback for us? Napoli: Yeah. President Cavener. So, yes, as far as with this -- and to maybe clarify a little bit. In my conversations with Nick, really, correct, he is not looking to waive the cross-access, it's really the easement versus stubbing it at this time and in talking with him if we are going to -- if you guys are going to move forward with the easement direction, which I didn't think was the direction, but if that was the case that you guys chose to do, in line with the house does make sense, so it is all in a line in the future. If it is going to be stubbed at this time it does not make sense to put it in line with the house, because, then, it's not actually usable at -- at this time. So, you know, in talking with my counterparts here at the city, as well as ACHD and especially my building department, because we don't want him to run into issues when it comes to building permit, he can actually put it in front of the building, there is enough space if he choose to do that and I did talk with my building department, it's not going to affect anything on his end. There is enough room, because he is doing water conserving design in his landscaping. So, his landscape buffer is actually going to be reduced 50 percent to 12 and a half feet, which will actually give adequate room for a 20 foot drive aisle where everything will still be accessible. Is that a perfect scenario? No. And that's really where, you know, in my conversation with Nick -- I talked about three different options, the front of the building or in front of the building, in between the -- the future shop and the building, which is not ideal either, so he is not walking out his back door into a drive Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 24 of 43 aisle or in the rear of the property where it's still not, you know, maybe the best place, but that may be an area where you guys feel more comfortable with it and that's really why I kind of broke down three different options for him and this is the site plan that he liked the most, the option of close to Linder in front of the building is the one that he liked the most and ultimately that's why we came forward with that tonight. I think staff is willing to work with him either way. I did the due diligence to make sure that any of the three could be -- could work functionally. But it really is your guys' purview on which three you guys would prefer to see if you do want a stub. Overton: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Overton. Overton: Just a quick follow up. Just a complete clarification on how this works. So, if we stub to the north at the front of his property and he stubs that all the way, but there is, what, a 32 inch difference between the two properties, I believe the applicant's understanding is he doesn't believe he can, then, use that area of stub street for presentation of his vehicles, but I would think as there is a 32 inch difference between the two properties, up until the time that the other side is being utilized he could still functionally use that property -- he can't gate the stub on either side, but you could still use it to position and show off your vehicles on a lot and -- is that a correct assumption? Napoli: Yeah. Council President Cavener, Council Member Overton, that is correct. As far as with this -- because the property of the north wouldn't actually be utilizing it, it's not actually a drive aisle that would be functional at that point, that -- on the north portion of the site. It could be used as -- in the interim, not necessarily is that -- I guess that could be worked into the condition if that's something that you guys did choose to do. That is something that could be worked in the condition, but, correct, since it's not actually a functional cross-access at this point it could be something that we condition would subside once the northern property redevelops. That's correct. Overton: Thank you. Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Vice-President Strader. Strader: Thank you. I just wanted to clarify -- it sounds like you are comfortable with the cross-access easements if it's in the front of your property, but I just wanted to clarify if we are requiring you to build a stub street to the edge of your property do you still want it in that location or is the back of your property better for you? Because long term if the property to the north redevelops, then, you would not be able to at that time show your vehicles in this spot, whereas if it was the spot in the back of your property, then, it wouldn't affect you as much. So, I -- I just kind of wanted to clarify that. I was in the camp of having you actually build the stub street and the reason that I feel that way is this is kind of our only bite at the apple. It's very difficult to get a property owner in Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 25 of 43 existing conditions when things change around them to, then, construct something; right? And so if you build the stub street on your property, then, all of the economics of building the remaining stub street to the north at the time that redevelops falls to that property owner. That -- that's where I was coming from. So, I just wanted to clarify do you still feel like the spot in the front of yours is where you would like to build a stub street if we require you to do that? Rinker: I guess -- I guess that's a tough one, because I don't -- can I -- can we go back to my PowerPoint? So, I guess the -- the part to me, like looking in the long term, the part for me that seems really challenging with that is like just -- because, you know, I have -- I have walked the property and I have driven on the property and so to try to like make the turn with a truck and trailer, fire truck, whatever, to get like here, here, here, it's just -- it's not -- you know, like the corner of my building is right in the way. This property -- I mean I'm not -- I'm not against it, it just seems like a really like aggressive little switch back to make, but -- again, I'm not an engineer. Just being on the spot there it's just -- it feels to me like it would be really challenging to kind of maneuver that. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Okay. If you grab a seat. This is a public hearing. Mr. Johnson, do we have anybody signed up? Johnson: Mr. Cavener, no. Cavener: All right. With no public testimony, is there any closing remarks you would like to make? Rinker: No. I mean I'm not. I definitely don't -- I don't want to get a denial. I want to do something that -- that makes sense. You know, again, just --just looking at it, like how it would look on a map, to me those three options just look not great as far as functionality goes and, then, coupling that with the stub on 444, you know, where it dumps right into that house, so -- yeah. I mean I want to do what makes the most sense. Either one of these are going to connect -- either one of these, whether it's here in line with the house, here, here, it's going to end up going and connecting -- not in line with any of this, so -- Cavener: Great. Rinker: Thank you for your time. Whitlock: Mr. President? Cavener: Mr. Whitlock. Whitlock: Can I just ask one question? Cavener: Mr. Whitlock, you can ask as many questions as you would like this evening. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 26 of 43 Whitlock: Does the 32 inch height extend the whole length of the northern part of your property? Rinker: Because I -- I haven't walked up there, no, not the whole length. There is a sidewalk there. So, it's -- it's definitely really aggressive, like from here all the way through here where that retaining wall starts and, then, it, you know, dumps down to where the sidewalk is in line, but, you know, all the way from here back past behind the fence and, then, it kind of gradually -- once you get to the very back of the property they are a lot closer to being level with each other. Whitlock: And so I guess my question is if we require cross-access you are going to have to do more than just have an eight foot wide gated access at some point, you build out and you have to build up in order to have that -- that access would be my -- my understanding. Rinker: I mean the way that I would have thought of that is that -- so, 370 is higher than the property to its north and to its south, so I would think long term what would make sense is for 370 to become lower to match the two properties adjacent to it versus me come up to match the outlier. Does that make sense? Whitlock: It does. Mr. President, follow up? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: It just -- from the -- the pictures it seems that -- to the north that cement wall and, then, part of their drive seems to be paved or cemented. So, what you are saying is tear all of that out to lower their elevation to match 330 and -- whatever the address was. Rinker: I guess it really depends on where the cross-access ends up being and what happens with that property when they annex and zone. I don't know. I mean would their driveway, the way it is, work as -- like could it be like that and that be the cross- access? This is what -- this is what it looks like from standing at 444 looking to the south at that property in question. Obviously you can't tell as aggressive, but that is a slope up and, then, it, you know, ultimately ends at that retaining wall, so -- Whitlock: Okay. Thank you. Cavener: Council -- or -- or -- or good clerk Mr. Johnson, remind me -- I didn't check to see if there was anybody online who chose testimony or anybody in the room that wished to testify that did not sign up? Okay. Okay. Please. We will do -- we will give you one more shot, sir, Mr. Rinker, to -- to provide final comments after -- Mr. Rinker, after you have heard from the public testimony. Rinker: Thanks. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 27 of 43 Cavener: Good evening. Welcome. Please state your name and address for the record and the time is yours, sir. Wilke: Good evening, commissioners and staff. Matt Wilke, P.O. Box 7, Middleton, Idaho. As I spoke before I represented Nick with his purchase on this property. I'm a real estate broker and do land development projects as well for planning. I just want to state -- we have a -- a pretty big project for a client out in Canyon county where we are actually working with Canyon Highway District 4. They have in their highway district manual requirements to where if you develop a property on a quarter section line you are supposed to provide for a collector road access across the property. Where we were developing property out there we were able to get a variance to just place an easement on the site and not build it at this time until future area development came in the future and that worked out really well, not only for my client, but also for Canyon Highway 4, because they didn't have to build the road to nowhere that they had to maintain and, then, things changed so much with development projects moving in towards the future where as we can see on this site currently there is not a lot of need for cross-access and it actually doesn't work out too well. I think -- my thoughts are, just like the applicant -- the applicant has stated that this one seems to be the most logical future access. Now, the 370 does have access currently reserved. They do have it stubbed right here. So, if they were to develop and ACHD is going to require them to cut this -- you know, close this curb cut most likely they will have good access here, just like Nick has to the south here. So, the applicant has access through this neighbor to the south. My thought was wouldn't it be advantageous to the city's future growth plan to just keep this as a reserved easement in this area and, then, if this building were to develop to a higher and better use someday and need to be removed that that overfill that was done just around this home site could be leveled out and it would match the north and the southern properties. That's kind of my thoughts and -- and ACHD did state that there were only 24 trips per day planned for the applicant's property here. I'm not sure what this property would plan in the future. It almost kind of looks like they are doing some type of lot storage use as well. So, I wouldn't anticipate it being too much different being a similar size property almost identical size if they were to keep this home. Now, if they did remove that in the future, like I said, they do have a great access here. That's where ACHD is going to want it and they are also going to want the access to the south. So, as the applicant stated, we have two curb -- we have two approved accesses on to Linder here for the principal arterial and the way these two buildings are -- the two home sites are currently it's not very conducive to a cross- access. If you went in front of the building it's really getting close to Linder. So, I would be in favor of just keeping that easement there in place in the middle there for future growth. Cavener: Great. Wilke: Thank you. Cavener: Thanks, Matt. Any questions? Seeing none, thank you, sir. Appreciate it. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 28 of 43 Wilke: Thank you. Cavener: Anyone else looking to provide public testimony this evening? All right. Mr. Rinker, the last word always belongs to our applicant. Anything else you would like to share with us? Rinker: Yeah. Thank you. Thank you, Council. So, one thing that just kind of popped into my head while I was looking at this, I was under the impression that if I were to stub out somewhere that that would basically devote that space on my site plan to nothing but a stub. If that makes sense. As if it were a road. So, if I did -- you know, if I were to stub out right here, but I could still park there until, you know, that cross-access is connected, then, it really wouldn't hurt my plan. I will -- I will tell you -- I mean the one thing that -- that I have to have on my site plan -- or, you know, that the city has to agree with ITD on is the five display spaces, so five spaces that I can display cars. So, you know, if I were to stub that right here yet -- but still as long as these two houses are standing be able to display cars on that space, then, it -- that wouldn't -- that wouldn't really hurt me. So, I just thought that was worth mentioning. Cavener: Council, any additional questions for the applicant? Overton: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Overton. Overton: Nick, I believe that's exactly what I was trying to get to -- Rinker: Okay. Overton: -- is that if you stub to the north up against a 32 inch concrete wall because they don't match up, you can't put a gate up there and you don't need to, because there is a 32 inch difference between the two elevations, but I do believe you will be able to use that property that is your stub for presentation of your vehicles for as long as that property remains until it becomes redeveloped with the one to the north, is that -- Rinker: That does. Yeah. Yeah. And knowing that that would definitely, you know, cause me to have this as -- as my preferred versus this is what I actually drew the site plan that I provided to Nick. If I were to stub it that was because I wasn't -- I didn't know that I could use that space in the meantime, if that makes sense, so -- Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Nick, I have got one for you. Rinker: Yes. Cavener: Sorry. Nick, our planning -- sorry about that. Nick, from -- from the planning staff's perspective where is the correct location to place this? Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 29 of 43 Napoli: President Cavener, is -- in regards to the correct placement -- and ideally, because -- unfortunately, because of the existing house putting it in line with the house provides some difficulties, because if the northern property is to redevelop it's not a usable cross-access at that point, because there is not actually a minimum 20 foot drive aisle is what we need. Without parking. So, that's the difficult -- that's why staff came forward with the potential for an easement in that location when we first came to you guys. It was for that kind of a compromise, after talking with the staff and with Bill and some other people in the planning department, it seems like we have done that in the past. However, if we want to stop now I would say the one along Linder or the one in the rear of the property are probably the two best locations for the applicant at this time if we are going to require a stub. It sounds like grade in the rear of the property might be a little bit less from what I understood. Could potentially be a little bit more advantageous in the future for that reason and it wouldn't affect the display area. So, as far as our -- my expert opinion in this case, if we are going to require a stub I think the rear of the proper would probably make more sense at this point. Cavener: Thank you. Council, additional questions? Thank you, Mr. Rinker. Appreciate it. Rinker: Thank you. Strader: Council President Cavener? Cavener: Council Vice-President Strader. Strader: Having just started discussion, I -- I have been a proponent of having him build the stub street. I feel like that usually gets us to the best outcome. It's pretty clear we are going to need some connectivity. I also feel like you are benefiting from cross- access. You should provide cross-access. I do think that's kind of being good neighbors. It -- it does definitely put some pressure on that property to the north to figure out -- to figure that out; right? So, if at that time they would have to make this cross-access work as well with whatever their plans are, but I think that that's kind of how this goes. You are here first and you are setting kind of what will happen. I -- would encourage you -- I -- I kind of agree that the one to the rear of the property might strategically be better for you, just because I'm concerned for you that if you do choose the one with your display area, if for some reason it did suddenly develop to the north, that could put you into a pickle, you know, a little bit easier. So, I actually think the one to the rear of the property makes sense for -- for all the reasons that our planning staff talked about. Yeah. This -- that to me makes the most sense. I'm happy to make a motion. I'm kind of like seeing some head nods. One not a head nod. So, I will wait. I will wait to hear what the twitch is about. Overton: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Overton. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 30 of 43 Overton: Yeah. I just want to kind of jump in, because I wasn't here on the 7th, but I do agree with most of the comments that were presented, that the stub street should be a requirement, not an easement, just because we don't really have the authority of the easement down the road and 15 years down the road to make sure that happens. The question then becomes what's the best location. I would love to have the applicant pick that location, but I also believe after listening to staff and Council Woman Strader that the rear is probably going to have the least effect on your business plan and be the proper place to put that stub street for the future. Again, we could be talking about something that's ten to 15 years down the road before it's ever needed and there is a whole different council up here at that time, but we don't want that council looking back at us going what were you guys thinking? How come you didn't require a stub street. We are trying to make sure that some errors that were made in the past aren't made today and that's the reason why we want to do this. This is our shot to make sure that we get that cross-access done and done right. So, I would support going to the rear location, not affecting your display area and requiring that stub street to the north. Cavener: Council, the public hearing is still open. Mr. Rinker, the public hearing is still open. You are welcome to provide a comment. Rinker: So, I think just with my site plan in my head thinking about an active cross- access in the front versus behind my building, you know, right here, but I think this -- is this the location that we have in question right now or the one at the very very rear? You are talking about the rear? Napoli: Nick, correct. It will be the one where the cursor is at. It will be behind the future maintenance shop, which there is potential some ways we could maybe move around your maintenance shop to where we can make it work a little bit better than where it's at. Rinker: Yeah. So, I mean in the spirit of not having to like so much cut mine and the neighbor to the north's property in half, you know, another solution would be for me, if we did the front cross-access closest to Linder, you know, I could potentially move this fence right here -- either get rid of it altogether or move it back, but either way set back these three cars and, then, give myself enough space -- a car length in front of them to put five cars there. So, that's another kind of way that I think we could make the front cross-access work with my site plan. Cavener: Council, any questions for the applicant? Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: So, sir, I'm hearing a strong preference for the location of the cross-access to be as close to Linder as possible. Could you just explain a little more -- is it the fence look? It's because of your fence that you would like to do that? Where I'm coming from Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 31 of 43 -- like I -- I would be happy to make a motion around that, but my concern for you would be if that ends up ever becoming an active cross-access, then, you have an issue with where your vehicles are displayed. It could disrupt your business, as opposed to the location that the planning staff just indicated. Rinker: So -- Strader: You are driving the process, so we -- Riker: So, the disruption of an active cross-access up here I think could be circumvented by moving these cars back 20 feet and, then, putting two cars in front of them. The disruption that would happen if I had a cross-access back here would just be, you know, we have, you know, some fairly high end rental cars that we have and manage and all of those things, so just -- kind of the security aspect of, you know, imagine a -- you know, a car rental lot or a car, you know, dealership with their inventory having kind of that like off of the main road access that is really secluded. That's my -- that's kind of where my mind goes is, you know, having people drive, you know, as it's as if it's a public road through my back lot that ideally would be somewhat secure, so -- Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Rinker. Any other questions? Okay. Thank you. Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: So, I -- I think I would -- I would be curious for planning staff to comment on that, just because it doesn't feel like this is a good location for cross-access, but could you make that work if the -- I mean if the property to the north redevelops it's possible that the house would have to be torn down. No one can predict the future. We have no idea what is planned to go there. Who knows, it could be a completely different use. No one can say. So, what -- what is your advice to us about if we are requiring a stub street where it should be required? Napoli: Council President Cavener, Council Woman Strader, great question. So -- and I had the same thoughts over the past several weeks and really several months of looking at this. So, I guess some pros and cons for you. For the part on Linder Road, the benefit for that is it doesn't affect the safety of his inventory, which I know is one of his largest concerns. As far as it going in the rear of the property, I would say the benefit is it keeps his display vehicles where they are. It -- I didn't actually know that there was a little bit less grade back there until tonight, because I haven't been able to walk the property, but, yes, there is a little bit less grade back there it sounds like. And, really, as far as with this some of my concern -- or I guess some of the cons for being in the front is pedestrian access is the main thing, something we hammer hard here at the city. It would be hard to have a pedestrian access on that. Be very difficult. I would probably have to tie in with the property to the south and I'm not sure exactly at this time how that would work, it's some -- we have some of the finer details we would find out a Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 32 of 43 little bit later on versus if it was in the rear it is something that, you know, correct, there would still be plenty of room for a pedestrian access to that front door. In talking with the building department the front door with the current building, if it was to go in front of the building, would not probably be the primary entrance to the business, it would probably be the rear door building on the backside here between the future shop. That's where the customers would ideally go, it wouldn't actually be in front where that -- where that drive aisle would be. You know, in doing some brainstorming in the past and I'm not here to design it, we are not the design -- we are not the design professionals, but there is the possibility of being able to move the future maintenance shop to where that drive aisle back there, you know, can be even a little bit closer to his building and all of that. It doesn't necessarily have to be all the way back next to the inventory and if he did choose to do so the inventory could be gated in the back. He could have gates closing off all his parking, so nothing is accessible. I don't know if that's something he would be willing to do. I do know that he does intend to have some security on the site, I just don't know to what extent. So, that's kind of my opinion. It's kind of weighing whether you guys wanted to be on the rear or the front. Like I said, knowing that there is a little bit less grade on the rear that does change some of the things that I was pointing out. Strader: A quick follow up. Cavener: Council Woman Strader. Strader: So, if -- if we -- hypothetically if there was a motion to approve with the condition that the applicant create a stub street, would it be adequate to say to the rear work with staff to create -- locate a sub street behind the maintenance shop to the rear of the property? Is that how that should be worded then? And, then, would that give some flexibility so you all could discuss I think maybe with a finer point? Napoli: Council President Cavener, Council Member Strader, correct. I think that that is an appropriate condition. This is from last hearing really the two provisions that we would need you guys to change is the three to five for the vehicle display area, so he can get his ITD dealership license. That's something that we -- he definitely needs. And, then, as far as provision C, it's a matter of the easement versus the -- the -- the stub and if you do want a stub I think saying behind the maintenance shop and -- in between the maintenance shop and the parking is adequate to where we can work with them with some flexibility. Strader: Thank you. Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: I am willing to take a shot at it and we could just see where -- where we are at maybe? Yes. I move that we close the public hearing on this item. Overton: Second. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 33 of 43 Cavener: Motion to close the public hearing. I think I heard a second from Council Member Overton. Overton: Yeah. Cavener: Any discussion? All in favor? President is aye well. The public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File No. H-2024-0048 as presented in the staff report for today's hearing date with some modifications. So, we would modify Provision B to update it to reflect that no more than five cars shall be displayed along North Linder Road at any time and, then, in addition we would require the construction of a stub street to the north to be located behind the maintenance shop to the rear of the property between the maintenance shop and the parking and direct the applicant to work with staff to determine that exact location. Little Roberts: Second. Cavener: Motion and a second. Any discussion? Seeing none, Mr. Clerk, please, call roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, recuse; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion passes. Thank for being with us this evening working through this one. Very interesting for all of us. Appreciate you being here tonight. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE RECUSE. 21. Public Hearing for Pine 43 West (CR-2024-0003) by CSGQA, located at Southwest Corner of N. Webb Ave. and E. Fairview Ave. A. Request: Council Review of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision for a reduced buffer width from 25ft. to 7ft. adjacent to parking and 10ft. adjacent to the rear of the future single-story building on Pad "A" with a reduced setback of 15ft. Simison: Council, we are going to move on to -- I guess. Thank you. Have a nice evening. Item 21. It is a public hearing for Pine 43 West, application 2024-0003. Begin tonight's public hearing with staff comments. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 34 of 43 Allen: Give me just one moment, please. Cavener: No problem. I spoke too quick. Allen: Alrighty. The next application before you is a request for City Council review. This site consists of 2.18 acres of land. It's zoned C-G and is located at the southwest corner of North Webb Avenue and East Fairview Avenue. In November of 2024 the Commission approved a conditional use permit for a drive-thru establishment in a C-G district within 300 feet of existing residential uses and residential zoning. The drive-thru is for a restaurant and was approved for a pickup service only. A menu board and/or speakers was not approved. The UDC requires a 25 foot wide landscape buffer to residential uses on C-G zoned property, sharing a contiguous lot line with a residential use. Because the abutting property to the west contains a multi-family residential use and the subject property consists of one parcel of land, a buffer is required along the entire western boundary of the site, rather than just adjacent -- adjacent to the drive-thru on the southern portion of the site. So, the -- the drive-thru is located right here on the west side of Pad B on the southern portion of the site and -- and, as I mentioned, the buffer we are talking about is right here along the entire west boundary. The buffer in this location does meet the minimum standard. So, the UDC does allow the width of the buffer to be modified by City Council at a public hearing with notice to surrounding property owners. A reduction in the buffer width does not affect building setbacks. All structures are required to be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the district, which is 25 feet. Staff is in the process of proposing an amendment to the UDC which would allow buildings to encroach in the buffer area if consent from the abutting property owner is obtained and if Council grants a reduced buffer width. In the interim, the code change, the director has determined a building can encroach within the required buffer area if Council grants a reduction to the buffer width and a reduced setback and consent from the adjacent property owner is obtained for the reduced buffer and building setback. A letter of support for the reduced buffer width and associated building setback was submitted with this application from the owner of the abutting residential property to the west, provided that a privacy fence and increased plantings are completed along the west boundary of the site, which will provide visual and sound buffering to the residential units. No other public testimony has been received. The applicant is here tonight to present. Cavener: Thank you, Sonya. Council, any questions? Seeing none, invite the applicant to come forward. Good evening. Thank you for joining us tonight. Please state your name address for the record and the time is yours, sir. Marsh: Yes. Good evening. For the record Jim Marsh, CSGQA Architects, 200 Broad Street, SCGQA. Also in attendance are representatives from the land ownership side. So, thank you, Sonya, for your report and all of her assistance in going through this process. We do have a presentation here -- a little zoomed in I think. There we go. All right. This is a -- a rendering here to start off with of the Pad A building that is where we are actually requesting Council review for the limited as -- about a ten foot encroachment into the 25 foot required setback between these two areas. Existing Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 35 of 43 townhouses that are to the west that are just recently constructed. I believe Kim went through a CU to be able to build a residential in the commercial districts right between these two commercial districts. The landowner and the adjacent town owners have a long standing of cooperation for these developments. When the townhomes were developed they had some challenges with storm water and the -- our -- our current landowner provided storm water retention and their common space so they could develop on their very tight kind of slender portion. Additionally, they provided connection to their irrigation system for their development and during construction they allowed the developer to use that area for staging and such and as Sonya has stated that we have obtained a consent and support letter from the adjacent owner of those apartments as well. So, kind of flip through these real quick aerial here. Currently just to the east is the existing Pine 43 retail. It's been a very successful multi-use, mixed- use development that is nearly a hundred percent leased out with LOI to kind of finishing out those last spaces, so now moving to the west to complete that development here with two buildings as Sonya said, Pad A on the north side of the building and a Pad B on the south side of the building. So, you can see that adjacent thin verticals there just to the -- I guess right here are the townhomes in question between these two commercial uses. Large site plan here just for -- here you can see the -- the landscaping and a five foot sidewalk for this Pad A building. So, we considered multiple different layouts for this. One of the first ones is -- if we kind of go up to the last one, you can see on this building -- most of the other Pine 43 buildings have the rear of the building facing Fairview or Cherry Lane and, you know, they have to be able to get some glass and some -- some signage on the back. Well, in this case when you rotate the building, the -- the alignment of Webb is such that it had to line up with the access across Fairview. So, it comes and it pinches that over quite a bit. So, additionally if we align the building with the back of the shops building facing Fairview, it would have exposed the front of the building and the parking to the adjacent residential. What we found is this orientation actually screens the parking lot and the front entries, most of the noise and such from the actual residences to the west. Yeah. The -- the constraints between the parking, the landscape setback off of Webb, and just the usable space for a depth of a usable shops building is why we are in here requesting that limited encroachment there. Real quick view of what the architecture of the building looks like. It's slight deviation from what's next door, but we think it has some common features and high quality materials. Elevations. We tried to keep this one actually slightly lower than that of the Pine 43 to the east of us. Wanted to try the -- the townhomes are three stories tall, so we were trying to keep this building as absolutely low as possible to reduce the impact. This happens to be the building to the south, which really isn't so much in question tonight. Again, elevations there to -- trying to keep them a little more low and sleek. Landscaping plan here. This is the overall. If anybody's familiar with Dennis Baker's landscape plans he has got an affinity for landscape and love for trees and does just a wonderful job with their landscaping and whether the city would require it he would probably go far beyond anyway. So, a robust landscape plan. As we look at kind of the north side there we have a ten foot landscape setback and a six foot high privacy fence along that whole western border of the property five Lindens trees -- full size Lindens trees are proposed along the backside to give some screening to the -- the building. As we kind of flipped through earlier we do Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 36 of 43 have a four sided architecture building where we try to keep high quality materials on the side that faces west as well. Very limited access on the back. Typically you would need an emergency access off the backside of those tenant spaces. Don't really see much loading as most of these have loading that comes through the front doors, but there is a sidewalk across the back of the building for a tenant access. The southern portion, as Sonya said, we already meet the setbacks required as needed next to the drive-thru that's proposed for the southern side. Landscape details. If anybody has any questions on those we can revisit those. The two trash enclosures that are on the site as well. Lighting is full cut off. Lighting -- we would make sure everything is fully shielded, so no light would spill over to the neighboring properties. We took a real quick -- just to kind of show we -- we stepped over in our model to look at what this looks like between -- what a 15 foot setback and a 25 foot setback is and that's kind of what you are looking at here. So, the top is what we are proposing with a 15 foot setback with those five trees. The bottom is the 25 foot. It doesn't make a huge difference necessarily from on this side. You can see the six foot fence on the privacy side and, then, we did have one more here kind of showing that more of the perspective view of the difference between what we are asking. Again, we have representatives from the land ownership here if they have any questions, but at this time I would stand for any questions that you guys may have. Cavener: Great. Thank you, Mr. Marsh. Council, any questions? Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Sir, thank you for the -- the presentation. I know you said it, I just might be missing the detail. The property to your west, those multi-family, what's the distance, then, again, between where their property line is and where the building is? Marsh: To their buildings -- Taylor: Yeah. Marsh: -- or to our buildings? From our property -- from the fence to our building would be 15 feet. Taylor: And, then, from the fence to their building? Marsh: I don't have that exact dimension here. We -- let me just see if I can -- Taylor: I'm not sure if it's necessarily relevant to the application, but -- Marsh: Yeah. You can see here that screened portion of the building. So, if this is 15 feet. It's probably another 25 feet or something on their side I would presume. Maybe a little bit more. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 37 of 43 Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Whitlock: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: Jim, just a question. The -- the property to the west are those owner occupied or -- Marsh: They are rentals. Whitlock: And Trade Winds? Marsh: That's correct. Whitlock: Okay. Thank you. Cavener: Council, additional questions? Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: What is the orientation of the townhomes? Because I see these little -- is the front entrance to the townhome actually going to be facing your property? Marsh: Yeah. The -- the -- the rear has the parking and the front entry I guess where most of the -- the -- come in is actually on the west side, but I think the -- the windows and stuff are facing from those townhomes towards the east. Yeah. It's a little hard to see here. Strader: Just a follow up. So, it kind of creates a little bit less of a functional front side to the townhomes. What I -- what I do appreciate here is the level of cooperation you have with the adjacent property owner. That's pretty unusual for us to see where there is this much alignment around what needs to occur. Do you know the status of the townhomes? Are they currently occupied? Have they just been constructed? Where are those at? Marsh: They were -- I believe started occupancy earlier this year. So, I believe they do have some occupancy in them currently. Strader: Uh-huh. Marsh: Yeah. I mean whether the building is set back 15 or 25, the -- you know, the occupants from those townhomes are going to be looking basically towards that six foot privacy fence and some landscape tree screening either way. Then, it's just really -- the Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 38 of 43 -- the distance from that building to the -- and that effect -- which is kind of what we were trying to illustrate with those last couple of slides. Strader: Uh-huh. Yeah. And just a quick question. Have you received -- I understand that the adjacent property owner that owns the townhomes is in agreement. Have you received any feedback from the tenants themselves? Marsh: We personally have not. Strader: Okay. Marsh: We did go through, of course, a conditional use and have the notice signs up and have not received any at this time, no. Strader: Okay. Cavener: All right. Thank you, Mr. Marsh. Marsh: Thank you. Cavener: This is a public hearing. Mr. Johnson, do we have anybody who signed up to testify this evening? Johnson: Mr. Council President, we did not. Cavener: Okay. Nobody has signed up. Is there anybody in the room that would like to provide testimony? If you would raise your hand or join us up front? Excellent. If there is anybody watching online that would like to provide public testimony feel free to use your raise your hand feature and we will call on you here in a moment. Good evening, sir. Welcome to Meridian City Council. If you could just state your name and address for the record and the three minutes -- Pederson: Tom. 19 -- 1909 North Highwood, Boise. Cavener: Thank you. Pederson: So, we own one of those townhomes down the street a little bit and it's really crowded and there is not -- you know, to try to look out your balcony window or whatever and see another business sitting there or -- I just -- you know, I'm just not -- we are not for that. I think they should leave it at the 25 feet and, you know, it's just -- it's too tight in there. If you drive down and you look at those little townhomes, there is just hardly any room, you know. So, if -- that's really the only room they have. If they look out their front door, they look out their back door, is that -- is that room that they are talking about. So, to -- to cut that down, you know, and owning one there, I -- I -- I'm not for that, so -- that's really all I got to say. Does anybody have any questions or -- Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 39 of 43 Cavener: Council, any questions? Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Cavener: Council Member Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mayor for the evening. President Cavener. Thank you for being here. So, in relation -- I don't know if you can still see the map. Where is your townhome? It's not one of those right there beside -- Cavener: There is a mouse that you can use to -- if you want to -- Pederson: I don't know -- I can't see it from here. They sent us a card and it's off of Wilson. Is where -- is where it is. So, they sent us a card here. I mean I'm not like -- don't -- the one we own isn't right next to the building they are building, but it's in the 43 Pines. Cavener: If you wouldn't mind just for the record, if you just want to also add your name and address for the record. Your -- your partner here that's with you. If -- if they are going to provide testimony we need you to speak into the microphone and need your name and address for the record. J.Pederson: Okay. Joanne Pederson. I'm living in 1909 North Highwood in Boise. This is our townhome here. This one here. Can you see the mouse? Cavener: We can see that. J.Pederson: Okay. That's what I wanted to know. So, this -- this site is like a three, four story apartment and, then, in behind the apartment and, then, all this little -- there is little little room for that. So, it looks like -- we walked through -- Pederson: Yeah. We have walked down there. J.Pederson: -- in front of that -- this building, that apartment here, there is a pretty tiny street there, so I don't know how they are going to change it from five to seven. Pederson: Yeah. J.Pederson: So, I -- we don't -- I didn't study to look at the map. We just received this and we said we want to come here to hear what is going on. Pederson: Yeah. It just seemed -- J.Pederson- Yeah. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 40 of 43 Pederson: -- to cut it down by two-thirds that just seemed -- I mean we -- you know, it's tight in there anyway and just to -- you know -- J.Pederson: Pine 43 it seems -- Pederson: Yeah. J.Pederson: -- really tight right now, but -- anyway. Cavener: Well, thank you. We appreciate -- that's the reason why those postcards are sent to make you aware and we appreciate you joining us this evening to provide your testimony. J.Pederson: Thank you. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Okay. Thank you very much. Anyone who hasn't signed up that would like to testify please come up and join us. Good evening. Nice to have you here. If you could, please, provide your name and address for the record and the time is yours, sir. Baker: Thank you, President Cavener -- or Council President Cavener and Council Members. I'm Matt Baker with DRB Investments, LLC. 1157 North Summerbrook Avenue, Meridian. Very much appreciate the opportunity to present this tonight. We have really enjoyed getting the first five buildings on the east side going. Almost one hundred full over there, now ready to move over to the east -- or to the west side and we worked really closely with -- with Steve Martinez and his dad Ted. I have a long history with the Martinez going back to all the years that Ted built in -- in -- in my dad's and Dennis's subdivisions. So, probably about a 40 year career amongst our family. So, we -- we were very -- when that was Butte Fence -- if you remember that was Butte Fence before and when they came and said they wanted to do that we were in support of that. So, we really worked closely together and I think towards the end Steve came back to -- to us and said it really is important to have that screening there. We need that, because if you stand on the property you are just completely exposed to Fairview and the -- and the -- and the traffic. So, this now -- the building, the landscaping provides more privacy for their units. I think that's why no one came out. Steve was in full support. They are looking forward to the landscaping that -- that we do, the type of trees, the caliper of trees. So, it's really a win for them to create that buffer and privacy for those units and we are going to make that look like a beautiful, beautiful park strip in there. I know where they live. They live across the street in -- in some units that my brother-in-law built. Brad Dildine, Hallmark Homes, built and it's really in addition to the neighborhood bringing in -- we have got some really great uses that are looking to come in there to finish out that frontage. So, I think it's a win-win for the neighborhood and especially for those people in there to get some privacy and some screening and we will make it absolutely beautiful. Any other questions for me? Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 41 of 43 Cavener: Any questions for Matt? Great. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Anybody else who has not signed up that would like to provide testimony? Let me check real quick if there is anybody on Zoom. Not seeing anyone with their hand raised. Would the applicant like to provide any final comments? Mr. Marsh? Okay. Applicant's waving final comments. Council, any additional questions for you? The applicant? Staff? Deliberation? Motion's always in order. Taylor: Mr. Cavener? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: I can make a motion to close the public hearing. Overton: Second. Cavener: Motion to close the hearing and second. All in favor? The president is aye as well. Motion passes. Public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: I think this is a -- I like this project. I think if you -- when you look at it, if you don't realize just to the immediate west is another retail space and that space is kind of a harsh abrupt, you know, distinct line that they are actually looking at the backside of just a building. So, I actually really appreciate the fact that on the other side, which is the front, even though it looks like the back because of the way people come in, to put up the landscape, I think it's a really nice touch to this. That housing project there is really tucked in a really tight space and so there is not a lot that you can do. So, I really I think I appreciate the fact that there is an emphasis on creating a nice buffer there with landscaping, even though they are asking for a reduction in the -- in the buffer. There is not a lot you can do there. It is a really nice project. I have seen that kind of develop and I think seeing the rest of this develop will be very nice and I really appreciate the connectivity through to Pine through what is becoming a really nice development overall and this is kind of one of those -- those final pieces. So, at the appropriate time I will be prepared to make a motion for approval. Cavener: Thank you, Councilman Taylor. And certainly I -- I remember when the -- the multi-family townhouse came in when it was -- you know, it's really in-fill and we -- I know Council really deliberated about does housing makes sense right there and -- and certainly we agreed and, Council Member Taylor, you are right, you -- you contrast what is the neighbors to the west, which was there first, versus what will be with the neighbors to the east and there is a much higher quality of life that comes for these multi-family residents with the project to the east and I feel really confident in the Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 42 of 43 applicant's ability to build this to a standard that is in line with the brand that we have seen before and it gives me great comfort that even at a loss of space that the neighbors and our community benefits net positive. So, I -- I certainly will be in support of this tonight as well. Overton: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Overton. Overton: Yeah. It's like I'm going to be three in a row. I really liked how the Pine 43 projects come together. I think even though this -- if you just looked at how tight things were you might think it's too tight, but when you really look at what it's adding and all its features and all this landscaping as a buffer behind that, it's fantastic. I think it's going to be a great addition. It's well laid out, well planned. I will be in support. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: I move -- after considering all staff, applicant, and public testimony I move to approve File No. CR-2024-0003, as requested by the applicant for the hearing date of January 21 , 2025. Little Roberts: Second. Cavener: It's been moved and seconded. Any -- any questions, comments? Seeing none, Mr. Clerk, please call roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. The motion passes. Thank you, Council. Thank you all for being with us this evening. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 22. Public Hearing for Lennon Pointe Subdivision (H-2024-0060) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at SE Corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Ustick Rd. A. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 41 single-family/townhome residential building lots, one (1) multi-family residential building lots, one (1) commercial building lot and Seven (7) common lots on 8.80 acres of land in the R-15 and C-C zoning districts with some private streets. Meridian City Council January 21,2025 Page 43 of 43 Simison: Let's move on to our last item of this evening, Item 22. This is a public hearing for Lennon Pointe Subdivision, application H-2024-0060. Turn this over to staff, which I understand we have got a noticing error on this one, so we need to continue it? Allen: Yes. The app -- not a noticing error, but the app -- well, it's a form of it I guess. To the public, yes. The applicant did fail to post the correct hearing date on the sign and they are requesting -- excuse me -- continuance to the February 4th hearing. Cavener: Okay. Council, here for that so -- Strader: Council President Cavener? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: I move that we continue Item 22 to February 4th. Taylor: Second. Cavener: It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? All in favor to continuing application 2024-0060 to February 24th say aye. February 4th. The president is aye as well and the motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Cavener: Any future meeting topics? If not I would entertain a motion for adjournment. Strader: I move that we adjourn the meeting. Taylor: Second. Cavener: Moved and seconded. All in favor say aye. I'm aye as well. And we are adjourned. Thank you, Council. Have a good evening. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8.01 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON 2-4-2025 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 2-4-2025 AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC:Approve Minutes of the January 7, 2025 City Council Work Session Meridian City Council Work Session January 7,2025 Page 10 of 10 Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, absent; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and we will go into Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (4:52 p.m. to 5:27 p.m.) Simison: Council, do I have a motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we come out of Executive Session. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to come out of Executive Session. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are out of Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Simison: Do I have another motion? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn our workshop. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5.27 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Minutes of the January 7, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 26 of 26 FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn the meeting. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:10 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Biltmore Emergency Access Relinquish of Easement (ESMT-2024-0154) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-004288 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=10 VICTORIA BAILEY 01/22/2025 03:16 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2024-0154 FULL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED: Emergency Access Easement Agreement GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTOR: Biltmore Estates LLC INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated July 27 , 2021 and recorded as Instrument Number 2021-130944 in the records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation, over and across the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS, the continuance of this easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the said City of Meridian does hereby vacate, relinquish, release and abandon the said rights and easements hereinabove referred to and described, with the intent that the same shall forthwith cease and be extinguished. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 21 St day of January 2025 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Sim a 25 � ! (:>W,y � SEAL Attest by Ch is Johnson—, ity Clerk 1-21-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 1-21-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 Notary Signature 3-28-2028 NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: STATE OF IDAHO Version 01/01/2020 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2021-130944 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=9 ANGIE STEELE 09/03/2021 08:45 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ADA COUNTY RECORDER Phil McGrane 2021-112389 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 ANGIE STEELE 07/28/2021 09:36 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN,IDAHO NO FEE Re-Record to correct Grantor,replacing page I -original document with page IA Change of Grantor and replacing signature page and notary page to reflect correct Grantor. Project Name(Subdivision): Grayetiff Estate Emergency Access Easement EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this27th day of July 1 2021, between Biltmore Estates LLC, hereinafter referred to as"Grantor"and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as"Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian is requiring an access area for emergency vehicles as a condition of development approval; and WHEREAS, Grantor desires to grant an easement for ingress and egress across those certain parts of Grantor's property defined herein to allow for emergency vehicle access; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct certain improvements-upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit"A"and depicted on Exhibit"B"attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way on, over, across and through Grantor's property with the free right of access to such property at any and all times and for the purpose of allowing egress and ingress to and from the property for emergency vehicle access. Pursuant to the International Fire Code, this access road shall be constructed of an improved surface capable of supporting 80,000 GVW; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; THE GRANTOR,hereby covenants and agrees that no structures shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon the surface of the easement area that would materially impair the normal operation or use of the easement area for emergency vehicular purposes.No parking of vehicles within the easement area shall be permitted. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees,brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement,which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the access roadway improvements. The easement area shall be maintained 365 days a year, including grading and plowing. EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT,PAGE 1 02/14/2020 Page 1 - Original Document Re-Record to correct Grantor,replacing page 1 -original document with page lA Change of Grantor and replacing signature page and notary page to reflect correct Grantor. Project Name(Subdivision): Graycliff Estates Emergency Access Easement EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this27th day of July , 2021, between Biltmore Estates LLC, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor" and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian is requiring an access area for emergency vehicles as a condition of development approval; and WHEREAS, Grantor desires to grant an easement for ingress and egress across those certain parts of Grantor's property defined herein to allow for emergency vehicle access; and WHEREAS, Grantor shall construct certain improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following property, described on Exhibit"A" and depicted on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way on, over, across and through Grantor's property with the free right of access to such property at any and all times and for the purpose of allowing egress and ingress to and from the property for emergency vehicle access. Pursuant to the International Fire Code, this access road shall be constricted of an improved surface capable of supporting 80,000 GVW; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; THE GRANTOR, hereby covenants and agrees that no structures shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon the surface of the easement area that would materially impair the normal operation or use of the easement area for emergency vehicular purposes. No parking of vehicles within the easement area shall be permitted. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees that it will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees,brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement,which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the access roadway improvements. The easement area shall be maintained 365 days a year, including grading and plowing. EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT,PAGE 1 02/14/2020 Page 1 Original Document Re-Record to correct Grantor,replacing page 1 -original document with page IA Change of Grantor and replacing signature page and notary page to reflect correct Grantor. Proiect Name(Subdivision): Graycliff Estates Emer2encv Access Easement AMENDED AND RESTATED EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Amended and Restated Emergency Access Easement Agreement is made this vZ 7� day of August, 2021, between Biltmore Estates LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, and L.C. Development, Inc., an Idaho corporation, hereinafter collectively referred to as "Grantors," and the City of Meridian, an Idaho municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS that certain Emergency Access Easement Agreement entered into between Biltmore Estates, LLC and the City of Meridian was recorded on July 28, 2021 as Ada County Instrument No. 2021-112389 ("Original Easement Agreement"); WHEREAS the Original Easement Agreement inadvertently omitted L.C. Development, Inc. as a Grantor; WHEREAS Grantors and Grantee desire to enter into this Amended and Restated Emergency Access Easement Agreement to include L.C. Development, Inc. as an additional "Grantor" of the subject; WHEREAS upon execution and recording, this Amended and Restated Emergency Access Easement Agreement shall amend and replace in its entirety the Original Easement Agreement; WHEREAS, Grantors are the owners of real property on portions of which the City of Meridian is requiring an access area for emergency vehicles as a condition of development approval; and WHEREAS, Grantors desire to grant an easement for ingress and egress across those certain parts of Grantors' property defined herein to allow for emergency vehicle access; and WHEREAS, Grantors shall construct certain improvements upon the easement described herein; and NOW, THEREFORE,the parties agree as follows: GRANTORS do hereby each grant unto Grantee an easement on Grantors'respective real property as described and depicted on Exhibit"A"and Exhibit`B"attached hereto and incorporated herein. THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose of providing a non-exclusive easement and right-of-way on, over, across and through Grantors' real property with the free right of access to AMENDED AND RESTATED EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT, PAGE 1 Page 1 A Change of Grantor such real property at any and all times and for the purpose of allowing egress and ingress to and from the real property for emergency vehicle access. Pursuant to the International Fire Code,this access road shall be constructed of an improved surface capable of supporting 80,000 GVW; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said easement unto said Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns, forever; GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that no structures shall be constructed, erected,or placed upon the surface of the easement area that would materially impair the normal operation or use of the easement area for emergency vehicular purposes.No parking of vehicles within the easement area shall be permitted. GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree that Grantors will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures,trees,brush,or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto that Grantors shall repair and maintain the access roadway improvements. The easement area shall be maintained 365 days a year, including grading and plowing. GRANTORS hereby covenant and agree with Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of, any public street, then to such extent, the easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect, and shall be completely relinquished. GRANTORS do hereby covenant with Grantee that Grantors are lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tracts of land, that Grantors have a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantors will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have hereunto subscribed Grantors' signatures the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTORS: Biltmore Estates,LLC By A'Ifen Lie Centers, aliager L.C. Development,Inc. By: L" Ile Lee Centers, President AMENDED AND RESTATED EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT, PAGE 2 Page 2 - Grantor Signature page replaced STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on August "7 2021 by Allen Lee Centers on behalf of Biltmore F.,states,LLC in the following representative capacity: Manager. A. +. It j40TA1Ry•.�c� �.� Notary Signature PCIBLV My Commission Expires: *+r;4.No.`s••* .��• STATE OF IDAHO �`�• rOF•��; ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on August 72021 by Allen Lee Centers on behalf of L.C. Development,Inc. in the following representative capacity: President. •`�,,�•e*`r"'w•+are _..-. �Y A. •: � s �r•••• :. *® Notary 4gnaCur C}TA k' 0 s My Commission Expires: //—/3 - '--o.S " «... '$. am ft Page 3 - Notary Page AMENDED AND RESTATED EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT, PAGE 3 Item#4. GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis yo r,,��.�� r 7-2021 MAN SEAS. Attest by Ch Johnson;C' e erk 7-27-2021 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 7-27-2021 (date)by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION#67390 Notary Signature NOTARY PUBLIC 3-28-2022 STATE OF IDAHO My Commission Expires. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3128122 EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT,PAGE 3 02/14/2020 Page 95 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Graycliff Estates Subdivision —Emergency/Secondary Access Easement An easement being located in the E'/z of Section 25, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point marking the northeast corner of the SW!/4(C '/a corner)of said Section 25,from which a point marking the northwest corner of said SW'/n bears N 89°26'30"W a distance of 2647.83 feet; Thence along the westerly boundary of said E'/z of Section 25 N 0027'25"E a distance of 78.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said westerly boundary N 0°27'25" E a distance of 493.72 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly boundary a distance of 57,80 feet along the arc of a 100,00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 33007'02" and a long chord bearing N 17°00'56" E a distance of 57,00 feet to a point; Thence N 33°34'27" E a distance of 60.96 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 90.85 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 74°21'50" and a long chord bearing N 70°45'22" E a distance of 84.61 feet to a point; Thence S 72°03'42"E a distance of 64.20 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 28.35 feet along the arc of a 35.84 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 45019'48" and a long chord bearing N 85014'34"E a distance of 27,62 feet to a point on the westerly boundary of Biltmore Estates Subdivision No.2 as shown in Book 109 of Plats on Pages 15494 through 15496, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence along said westerly boundary S 36°28'59" E a distance of 20.16 feet to a point; Thence leaving said westerly boundary a distance of 47.35 feet along the arc of a 55,84 foot radius curve right, said curve having a central angle of 48°35'23"and a long chord bearing S 83°36'46"W a distance of 45.95 feet to a point; Thence N 72°03'42"W a distance of 64.21 feet to a point; Thence a distance of 54.89 feet along the arc of a 50.00 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 74°21'50" and a long chord bearing S 70°45'22"W a distance of 60.43 feet to a point; Thence S 33°34'27"W a distance of 60.96 feet to a point; �in,d-SC9l'tl�'�ionS Blitmore Estates JobLLC-or18-26 Job No.18-26 �� land Surveying and Consulting Page 1 of 2 Thence a distance of 46.24 feet along the arc of an 80,00 foot radius curve left, said curve having a central angle of 33°07'02"and a long chord bearing S 17a00'56"W a distance of 45,60 feet to a point; Thence S O027'25"W a distance of 492.87 feet to a point; Thence S 4'22'32" E a distance of 379.60 feet to a point on the future right-of-way of W. Harris Street, Thence along said future right-of-way a distance of 20.04 feet along the arc of a 675.00 foot radius non-tangent curve right,said curve having a central angle of 1a42'04"and a long chord bearing S 82003'42"W a distance of 20.04 feet to a point; Thence leaving said future right-of-way N 4a22'32"W a distance of 381.69 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This easement contains 23,339 square feet(0.54 acres), more or less, and is subject to any other easements existing or in use. ON,. LAYVO Clinton W. Hansen, PLS _ r Land Solutions, PC July 2, 2021 44 01 11118 '9 T� F <Cr adiff UiWd {.lufi�Ans Blltmore Estates Job No.r10-26 (`­- sand 5umaying and consulting Page 2of2 EXHIBIT B GRAYCLIFF ESTATES SUBDIVISION - EMERGENCY/SECONDARY ACCESS EASEMENT i .� W. 6tiRt7AK OR. � } 1}f W. OAK VIEW DR. ` co toF - fIy --26 EMERG-FENCY s* L 1 SECONDARY ACC1 tnnl °In EASEMENT.Fq o' N 1FN 1 F4 W. OAK SPRINGS 01� a POINT OF z r") BEGINNING 23",39 SF— — i 261/425 N69'2630"W -' \, y _ S89'23'56"E 1320,68' W. HARRI$ ST. 2647,83 C 1/4 )1 \ CE 1/16 9 Ct `+ J \ t0 (o , CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA BEARING CHORD LINE TABLE, ' Cl 57.80 100.00' 33'07'02" N17'00'56"E 57.00' LINE LENGTH BEARING C2 90.85' 70.00' 74'21'50" N70'45'22"E 84.61' L1 7aW ND'27'25"F CJ 26.35' 35.64' 4379'46" IV65'(4'34"E 27.62' L2 60.96' N3334'27"E +r C4 47,35' 55.84' 48'35'23" S83'36'46"W 45.95 L3 64.20' S72'03'42"E C5 64.89' 50.00' 74'21'50" S70'45'22"W 60.43' L4 20.16' S36'28'59"E � � � C6 46.24' 80.00' 33'07-02" S17-00'56"W 45.60' L5 64.21' N72'03'42"W C7 20.04' 675.00' 1'42'04" 582'OS42"W 20.04' L6 60.96' S33'34'27"W \ L7 381.69' N4'22'32"W tit`LApps TARS' 1 118 qz, " Lan to i n �A -zk \P w Land surveying and Consulting 0' 125' 250' 500 or h 231 E.5TH ST.STE A 11 QM W• ,f MERIDIAN,ID 83642 �T (20S)2W2040 (206)204,21557 lax www landsolullow bu JOB NO 10-25 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Holiday Inn Express Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement (ESMT-2023- 0093) Project Name(Subdivision): Holiday Inn Express Sanitary Sewer&Water Main Easement Number: ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-004285 ESMT-2023-0093 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=6 VICTORIA BAILEY 01/22/2025 03:15 PM Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE more than one easement of this type. (See Instructions for additional information). SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this21stday of January 20 25 between Hotel Developers-Meridian Hix,LLC ("Grantor") and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation ("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a sanitary sewer and water main right-of- way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the sanitary sewer and water is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer and water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of sanitary sewer and water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right- of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Hotel Developers-Meridian HIX, LLC STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on d c /z 3 (date) by Rusty Landon (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strife the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Hotel Developers-Meridian HIX,LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity:Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) ...�. CLINT JOLLEY Notary Public-State of Idaho Commission Number 20230423 Notary Sign tore My Commission Expires Jan 30,2029 My Commission Expires: l �o/`7�Z l Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis n, ayor 1-21-2025 � SEAL Attest by ehris Johnson, City Clerk 1-21-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) 1-21-2025 This record was acknowledged before me on (date) by Robert E. S i m i s o n and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (stamp) Na&wW Notary Signature 3-28-2028 My Commission Expires: CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Easement REV.01/01/2020 EXHIBIT A SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENT Part of Parcels A and B of a Deed as recorded in Instrument No.2020078300 located in the NW%&the SE '/.of Section 17,Township 3 North Range 1 East, B.M.,Ada County, Idaho described as: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Parcel B;Thence,S 530 30' 37"W 50.59 feet along the North Right-Of-Way line of East Freeway Drive;Thence, N 360 29' 23"W 15.00 feet to the point of beginning; Thence, N 260 57' 15"W 241.96 feet Thence, S 62°00'30"W 9.96 feet; Thence, N 270 56'57"W 23.46 feet;Thence, S 64°53'35"W 6.30 feet; Thence, N 25D 06'25"W 10.00 feet; Thence, N 640 53'35" E 5.80 feet;Thence, N 270 56'57"W 286.95 feet; Thence, N 72D 04'53"W 562.28 feet; Thence,S 170 55'07"W 10.72 feet; Thence, N 72`04'53"W 13.41 feet; Thence, S 16°49'48"W 296.02 feet; Thence,S 500 39'27"W 27.06 feet; Thence, N 89'56'41"W 94.90 feet to a point on the Easterly Right of Way of South Wells Street also being the West line of said parcel A; Thence along said Right of Way N11 D 09'29"W 6.05 feet to beginning of a curve; Thence,25.72 feet along said curve to the right(Curve Data= Delta: 13"50'29", Radius: 106.72 feet,chord bearing N 020 37'01"W 25.72 feet; Thence, S 890 56'41"E 72.51 feet;Thence,N 000 03' 19"E 11.75'feet; Thence, S 89e 56'41"E 10.00 feet;Thence, S 000 03' 19"W 9.47 feet;Thence, N530 00'43"E 7.60 feet; Thence, N 160 49'48" E 373.00 feet; Thence,S 730 10' 12" E 31.51 feet;Thence, S 16" 19'48"W 48.09 feet; Thence, S 720 04'53"E 337.56 feet; Thence, N170 55'07" E 10.43 feet;Thence, S 720 04'53" E 10.00 feet; Thence, S 170 55'07"W 10.43 feet;Thence, S720 04'53"E 242.95;Thence, S 27"56'57"E 332.56 feet, Thence, S 260 57' 15"E 238.96 feet to a point on said North Right-Of-Way line of East Freeway Drive; Thence, S 530 30'37"W 20.28 feet to the point of beginning; Parcel contains 0.97 acres, more, or less. `JNp,L tgp�s IV �G%STfR G4+� 15571 ,r�,612/Z3�o OF l�Nl 11. JO��'� 2" tHeerxo. DMWNSY MONEY ONIDKSY EXHIBITA IIINLE COS NG INNTRUSTED LLC MERIDIAN J0B"t -M MATERIALS TESTING L& LAND •UIRVEYINO DATE: MAYYS,M 101&Park Avenue,Idaho Falls,ID 83402,(208)5240212 SEC.17.T.3 N.,R.1 E.B.M. " ONB °ATE ® meinc.eom 800 W.Judlclal Street,Blackfoot.ID 83221,(208)7M2977 a 3 aem ADA COUNTY,IDAHO COPYPJGHT®2021 HLE ALL ROWS IMBEXVED. EXHIBIT B S WELLS ST. 1"=100' N11°09'29"W C1 NOD 03' 19"E 6.05' 11.75' S89°56'41'"E Found 5/8"Iron Rod S89°56'41"E Bent 72.51' 10.00' N890 56'41"W 94.90' S500 39'27"W S16 N'6°43r48"E 3) 4g" 3.00, 27.06' 2g 48"W N53°00'43"E 6 02, 7.60' •SO°03' 19"W 9.47' S730 10'12"E AMENDED MAGIC N72°04'53"W 32.51' VIEW SUB 13.31' S17°55'07"W S16°49'48"W BLOCK 1 10.72' 48.09' LOT 16 Deed Inst. No. 102038407 co Parcel A Deed Inst. No. 2020078300 M N to � 44/ O \ONp,L LANQ s �r'j S rr Gam` o Found 1/2"Iron Rod c �A, With No Cap a 15571 '01 '`' N170 55'07"E 10.43' �� of �a� S72°04'53"E M. 10.00' 8170 55'07"W 10.43' S72° 04'53"E 242.95' SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 LEGEND Curve Table Section Corner Control Curve# Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Placed 1/2"X 24" Iron C1 25.78' 106.72' 13°50'29" 25,72' N2°37101"W rod with cap marked P.L.S. 12224 Found Iron Rod as shown Mom mm eY a amw cmaeY EXHIBIT B Si HLE cas ��y�o�� INNTRUSTED LLC MERIDIAN MOW. 20214a CIVIL&YTRUDTURAL ENOINEERINO- MATERIALS TESTiNO &LAND IIURVEYINO DATE:Mer25,2023 101 S.Perk Avenue,Idaho Falls,ID 83402,(208)5240212 SEC.17,T.3 N.,R.1 E.B.M. ems" c^T� S 800 W.Judictel Street,Blackfoot,ID 83221,(208)785.2077 hlelnc,com m3 aKm ADA COUNTY.IDAHO COPYRIGHT©Y021 HLEALL RMM RESERVED. EXHIBIT B QT." 1"=100' SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 AMENDED MAGIC c VIEW SUB N 72°04'53"W M � N BLOCK 1 562.28' LOT 16 O� Deed Inst. No. 102038407 N 27056'57"W 286.95' co a a N 25006'25"W 10.00' LOT 9 S 64053'35"W N 64°53'35"E AMENDED MAGIC 6.30' 5.80' 332y6 VIEW SUB N 2705657"W y�0 23.46' ° S 62000'30"W P.O.B. 9.96' Parcel B 20 2° 830I 37"W 2�,�96 Deed Inst. No.2020078300 Val \ 0�� LOT10 g26 AMENDED MAGIC VIEW SUB N36029'23"W LOT 2,BLOCK 1 15.00' Deed Inst. No. 2018106221 Found 5/8" Iron Rod Np1, Lit po 'V S53°30'37"W Marked P.L.S. 11120 �� s 50.59' ��s' e�G%s Tripe FALLON GREENS SUB c ��'" �c BOOK 86,PAGE 9870 1 71 sj,6f L f Z3 0 err OF 0 LOT 1,BLOCK 1 LEGEND Found 5/8"Iron Rod Found 1/2" Iron Rod Marked P.L.S. 6901 Section Corner Control CRM Placed 1/2"X 24"Iron h S ALLEN ST. oo rod with cap marked C NE COR SEC 17 P.L.S. 12224 rn CQ ROS Inst. No. 98120823 k w POSITION CALCULATED Found Iron Rod as shown t° FROM TIES PER E 1/4 COR SEC 17 CP&F INST. NO, 99007475 POSITION CALCULATED CR FROM TIES PER -4 104.08' 2548.84' CP&F INST. NO. 990074760 S0°22'2$"E 2652,82' w m X.3 GRAVMW GUIWBY CIE°l8Y �� 4021d�5 EXHIBIT B 8J HLE casCIVIL&BTRUOTURAL BNOINEERINO INNTRUSTED LLC MERIDIAN MATERIALS TEBTINO &LAND BURVEYINO VAT@ M-YaRM 101 S.Park Avenue,Idaho Falls,ID 83402,(208).524-0212 SEC.17.T.3 N.,R.1 E.B,M. WIN " GAT" 4d*IEM;�, 800 W.Judiclel Street,Blackfoot,ID 83221,(208)7M2977 ADA COUNTY,IDAHO COPY"GHT©2021 HLE ALL WH-T8 RESERVED. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Holiday Inn Express Water Main Easement (ESMT-2023-0094) Project Name(Subdivision): Holiday Inn Express Water Main Easement Number: Identify this Easement by sequential number if Project contains more than one Water Main easement. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-004286 (See Instructions for additional information). BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 VICTORIA BAILEY 01/22/2025 03:15 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE ESMT-2023-0094 WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement, made this 21 st day of January , 20 25 between Hotel Developers-Meridian HIx,LLC ("Grantor"), and the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS, the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others; and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right-of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities, together with their maintenance, repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, it's successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance, Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation of this easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor will not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures, trees, brush, or perennial shrubs or flowers within the area described for this easement, which would interfere with the use of said easement, for the purposes stated herein. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of- way and easement hereby granted shall become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs, personal representatives, purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. GRANTOR: Hotel Developers-Meridian HIX, LLC STATE OF IDAHO ) ) ss County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 0 Vo 5113 (date) by Rusty Landon (name of individual), [complete the following if signing in a representative capacity, or strike the following if signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of Hotel Developers-Meridian MIX,LLC (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Manager (type of authority such as officer or trustee) (stamp) �— Notary Sifnature CLINT JOLLEY My Commission Expires: 1 30 2-oz4 Notary Public-State of Idaho Commission Number 20230423 My Commission Expires Jan 30,2029 Water Main Easement Version 0 1/0 1/2020 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Sim on ayor 1-21-2025 � SEAL Attest by diris Johnson, City Clerk 1-21-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 1-21-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Cha&YcWaj� CHARLENE WAY Notary Signature COMMISSION No. 67390 My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Water Main Easement Version 01/01/2020 EXHIBIT A 20' WATER METER EASEMENT Part of the NW X SE%Section 17 Township 3 North Range 1 East B.M. Ada County, Idaho described as: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Block 1 Lot 23 of Amended Magic View Subdivision Bk.52 Pgs. 4445-4446 to a non-tangent curve;Thence, Northeasterly 44.57 feet, along said curve to the right (Curve Data= Delta: 00°41'45", Radius: 3669.72 feet, chord bearing N 550 27' 53" E 44.57 feet)to the Point of Beginning;Thence, N 340 40'59"W 60.81 feet;Thence, N 55° 19'01" E 20.00 feet;Thence, S 340 40' 59" E to the Southerly line of said subdivision 60.68 feet to a non-tangent curve;Thence, along the Southerly line of said subdivision,Southwesterly 20.00 feet, along said curve to the right (Curve Data= Delta:00° 18'44", Radius: 3669.72 feet, chord bearing S 540 57' 39"W 20.00 feet)to the Point of Beginning. Easement contains 0.03 acres more or less. _ �a\jN�,L LANp SG % %. .ISTfRF 4►� o � < 1 571 61y10 �rE OF `'o exenx0. DRAYAISY MIGNSY CHSDASY EXHIBIT A sJ HLE CGS INNTRUSTED LLC MERIDIAN CNO '°°"° EE2090 EI41�\ MATERIAL8 TCOTINOL&LAND SUM EYING DATE' dune2.2023 101 S.Park Avenue,Idaho Falls,ID 83402,(208)524-0212 SEC.17,T.3 N.,R.1 E.B.M. REV181M °ATE 800 W.Judkdel Street,Blackfoot ID 83221,(208)785 2977 hlelmoom a 2 Raan ADA COUNTY,IDAHO COPYRIGHT®2021 HLE ALL RXWS RESERVED. LEGEND EXHIBIT B Section Corner Control LOT 1, BLOCK 1 Placed 1/2"X 24" Iron rod with cap marked I P.L.S. 12224 Found Iron Rod as shown Found 5/8" Iron Rod AMENDED MAGIC Marked P.L.S. 11120 VIEW SUB P.O.B. BLOCK 1 LOT 23 610 .00, N 55019'01"E 20.00' �PA10 S 34040'59" E 60.68' 2 ° 0=0°1844" 1"=50' 60 os R=3669.72' pl LqN c9� c9� L=20.00' �i`'\ON \Stf O�G4► P.O.B. LC=20.00 G 44, A=0°41'45" S54057'39"W c R= 3669.72' d 1 571 L =44.57' LC=44.57 10O�rE of \op� N55027'53"E Found 5/8" Iron Rod (P.O.B.) Z2- GMYMSY MEMO EIECKaY EXHIBIT B e, HLa cos CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING INNTRUSTED LLC MERIDIAN 2020-M � MATERIALS TESTING 6, LA NO SURVEYING DATE- JOS a 2022 101 S.Park Avenue,Idaho Falls,ID 83402,(208)524.0212 SEC.17,T.3 N..R.1 E.B.M. REVIBIM 0A1E ® ® 800 W.Judicial Street,Blackfoot,ID 83221,(208)785.2977 I ADA COUNTY,IDAHO - COPYRIOHT®207t HLEAtI RHi11T8 RESERVED. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement (ESMT-2024-0173) Projed Nam or Subdivision Name: Sagarra Subdivision N .2 "i*or int ai Use onty ESMT-2024-0173 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-004287 Record Number: - BOISE IDAHO Pgs=14 VICTORIA BAILEY 01/22/2025 03:16 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EAaEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 21 St day of January 2025 between Sagarra 139, LLC tor" the City ofMeridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); W ESSE WHEREAS, for is the owner ofreal property on portions of which the City of Meridian desires to establish a public pathway; WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to grant an easement to establish a public pathway d provide connectivity to;present and future portions vfthe pathway; and WHEREAS,Grantor shall construct the pathway improvements upon the easement described herein and NOW,THEREFORE,the parties agree follows: THE GRANTOR does hereby grant unto the Grantee an easement on the following pro described on Exhibit "A" and depicted can Exhibit " " attached hereto and incorporated here` THE EASEMENT hereby granted is for the purpose ofproviding a public pedestrian pathway easement for multiple-use non-motorized recreation, with the free right of access to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, said easement unto said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. THE GRANTOR cove is and agrees that Grantor shall not placeor allow to b placed y permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's of said easement, including, but not limited to, buildings, trash enclosures,carports, sheds,fences,trees,or shrubs. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED,by and between the parties hereto, that the Grantor shall repair and maintain the pathway improvements. THE GRANTOR hereby covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the easement hereby granted become part of, or lie within the boundaries of any public Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 1 Version 01/01/2024 then, to such extent such casement hereby granted which lies within such boundwy thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that it is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that it has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that it will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereofagainst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Grantor has hereunto subscribed its signature the day and year first hereinabove written. GRANTOR: Sagarra 139, LLC By: Matt Vlllalobos, Manager STATE OF lakftMl V*4.%-, ) ss County off ) SUw+.x'+- , 1 �OZ� This record was acknowledged before me on NO<) L (date) by Mattvnakbos (name of individual), [complete the following ijsigning in a representative capacity, or strike the following f signing in an individual capacity] on behalf of sagarra 139, t1C (name of entity on behalf of whom record was executed), in the following representative capacity: Manager .(type ofauthority such as officer or trustee) Notary Stamp Below MARK GROSE ` t NMRY PUBLIC-STATE OF UWT) Notary Signature =' COMMISSION EXP.101051202i COMMISSION NO.n7132 My Commission Expires:_ Q'4J 112' Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Si 'so Mayor 1-21-2025 2'/ - Attest by C 's Jo 'a ity Clerk 1-21-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 1-21-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk,respectively. NaLar} Stamp Bc1ow CHARLENE WAY COMMISSION No. 67390 Notary Signature My Commission Expires: 3-28-2028 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Pedestrian Pathway Easement Page 3 Version 01/01/2024 Exhibit A Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement #1 A pedestrian pathway easement located in Lot 1, Block 3 of Linder Village Subdivision and for the proposed Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 and lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap also being the northwest corner of said Section 25; thence along the west section line 5.00°55'10"W. a distance of 965.30 feet to a point; thence 5.89°04'59"E. a distance of 2017.07 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence 5.89°22'05"E. a distance of 15.01 feet to a point, being the NE corner of Lot 8 Block 5; Thence S.03°03'29"W. a distance of 14.04 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the left a distance of 7.95 feet, said curve having a radius of 22.50 feet, a delta of 20°14'35", and a chord bearing 5.07'03'48"E. a distance of 7.91 feet to a point; Thence 5.17°11'06"E. a distance of 12.34 feet to a point; Thence N.86°56'05"W. a distance of 0.73 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the left a distance of 14.64 feet, said curve having a radius of 20.00 feet, a delta of 41°56'18", and a chord bearing S.72'05'46"W. a distance of 14.31 feet to a point; Thence N.17°11'06"W. a distance of 12.27 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the right a distance of 13.25 feet, said curve having a radius of 37.50 feet, a delta of 20°14'35", and a chord bearing N.07'03'48"W. a distance of 13.18 feet to a point; Thence N.03'03'29"E. a distance of 13.41 feet to a point, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains S3S square feet, more or less. 15755 OF ���¢� Exhibit A Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement #2 A pedestrian pathway easement located in Lot 1, Block 3 of Linder Village Subdivision and for the proposed Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 and lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap also being the northwest corner of said Section 25;thence along the north section line 5.89°22'30"E. a distance of 2110.22 feet to a point; thence 5.00'37'30"W. a distance of 963.72 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along a non-tangent curve to the right a distance of 25.34 feet, said curve having a radius of 319.63 feet, a delta of 4'32'29", and a chord bearing 5.08'41'19"E. a distance of 25.33 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the right a distance of 24.10 feet, said curve having a radius of 140.16 feet, a delta of 9'51'05", and a chord bearing S.01'29'32"E. a distance of 24.07 feet to a point; Thence N.86`56'05"W. a distance of 15.00 feet to a point; Thence along a non-tangent curve to the left a distance of 21.62 feet, said curve having a radius of 125.16 feet, a delta of 9'53'46", and a chord bearing N.01°28'12"W. a distance of 21.59 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the left a distance of 23.05 feet, said curve having a radius of 304.63 feet, a delta of 4'20'07", and a chord bearing N.08'35'08"W. a distance of 23.04 feet to a point; Thence along a non-tangent curve to the left a distance of 15.04 feet, said curve having a radius of 258.01 feet, a delta of 3'20'27", and a chord bearing N.74°51'38"E. a distance of 15.04 feet to a point, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 705 square feet, more or less. VX Eo `pG c G. 15758 a 0 0 O Exhibit A Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement #3 A pedestrian pathway easement located in Lot 1, Block 3 of Linder Village Subdivision and for the proposed Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 and lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap also being the northwest corner of said Section 25;thence along the north section line 5.00'55'10"W. a distance of 782.99 feet to a point; thence 5.89'04'59"E. a distance of 2324.87 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N_45°42'09"E. a distance of 15.00 feet to a point; Thence 5.44'17'51"E. a distance of 37.95 feet to a point; Thence 5.45°42'09"W. a distance of 15.00 feet to a point; Thence N.44*17'51"W. a distance of 37.95 feet to a point, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 569 square feet, more or less. so 15758 8- o a �� IF ►©PLO J. HO* Exhibit A Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement #t4 A pedestrian pathway easement located in Lot 1, Block 3 of Linder Village Subdivision and for the proposed Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 and lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap also being the northwest corner of said Section 25; thence along the West section line 5.00°55'10"W. a distance of 584.98 feet to a point; thence 5.89'04'59"E. a distance of 2643.52 feet to a point lying on the southerly right-of-way of W. Orchard park Drive, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along a non-tangent curve to the right along said southerly right-of-way a distance of 5.73 feet, said curve having a radius of 28.00 feet, a delta of 11'42'23", and a chord bearing N.84°46'55"E. a distance of 5.72 feet to a point; Thence continuing along said southerly right-of-way 5.89'21'24"E. a distance of 6.31 feet to a point; Thence 5.00'32'03"W. a distance of 428.51 feet to a point; Thence N.89°27'57"W. a distance of 12.00 feet to a point,- Thence N.00*32'03"E. a distance of 427.94 feet to a point, said poingr being the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 5,141 square feet, more or less. 15758 0 0 66 ayl2-il Z`�o OF V �•''��CC J. #{prN Exhibit A Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 Pedestrian Pathway Easement ##5 A pedestrian pathway easement located in Lot 1, Block 3 of Linder Village Subdivision and for the proposed Sagarra Subdivision No. 2 and lying in the NW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an aluminum cap also being the northwest corner of said Section 25; thence along the North section line 5.89°22'30"E. a distance of 2653.23 feet to a point;thence 5.00'37'30"W. a distance of 1073.37 feet to a point, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence 5.00`32'03"W. a distance of 121.92 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the right a distance of 26.97 feet, said curve having a radius of 37.00 feet, a delta of 41°46'17", and a chord bearing S.21'25'12"W. a distance of 26.38 feet to a point; Thence S.42'18'20"W. a distance of 37.18 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the left a distance of 38.21 feet, said curve having a radius of 79.06 feet, a delta of 27041'17", and a chord bearing 5.28'42'14"W. a distance of 37.84 feet to a point; Thence along a curve to the right a distance of 4.97 feet, said curve having a radius of 35.59 feet, a delta of 8*00'05", and a chord bearing 5.18'51'38"W. a distance of 4.97 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the right a distance of 43.91 feet, said curve having a radius of 37.15 feet, a delta of 67'43'18", and a chord bearing 5.56'43'20"W. a distance of 41.39 feet to a point; Thence N.89'25'01"W. a distance of 762.64 feet to a point lying on the easterly right-of-way of N. Bergman Avenue; Thence along said easterly right-of-way N.0°37'48"E. a distance of 12.00 feet to a point; Thence 5.89°25'01"E. a distance of 762.63 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the left a distance of 29.72 feet, said curve having a radius of 25.15 feet, a delta of 67°43'18", and a chord bearing N.56°43'20"E. a distance of 28.02 feet to a point; Thence along a curve to the left a distance of 3.29 feet, said curve having a radius of 23.59 feet, a delta of 8°00'05", and a chord bearing N.18'51'38"E. a distance of 3.29 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent to the right a distance of 43.98 feet, said curve having a radius of 91.06 feet, a delta of 27'40'18", and a chord bearing N.28*41'4S"E. a distance of 43.55 feet to a point; Thence N.42°18'20"E. a distance of 37.16 feet to a point; Thence along a tangent curve to the left a distance of 18.23 feet, said curve having a radius of 25.00 feet, a delta of 41`46'17", and a chord bearing N.21'25'12"E. a distance of 17.83 feet to a point; Thence N.0'32'03"E. a distance of 121.92 feet to a point; Thence 5.89`27'57"E. a distance of 12.00 feet to a point, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; Said easement contains 12,178 square feet, more or less. 0 15758 0 wiz-+e—r. 'o OF 0 4 �J. �#A EXHIBIT B - PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT #1 DRAWING SHOWING A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT FOR SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 LYING IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, T.4N., R.1 W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2023. Curve Table CR 201 7-07 2470 Curve/ Length Radius Delta Chord Dl,.tlon Chad Length 23 24 C1 7.95' 22.50' 20'14'35' 57'03'48'E 7.91' C2 14.64' 20.D0'` 41'56'18' S72'05' 46'W 14.31' 26 25 C3 13.25' 37.50' 20'14'35' 147'03'48'W 13.18' e. �FG N 15758 c� 2c of ►�p�4 ED BLOCK 5 O FfiO� 00 N In S89'04'59 E S89'22'05"E w A - 0 2017.07' V 15.01' J-) f . � W � 0 Z (p N I OT N M O f O Q z � V) f Q T 1/16 CDR. 9 ILLEGIBLE O U ` LEGEND SECTION LINE 1 1 LOT O — TIE LINE � �1•� — — — — — — — EASEMENT 1 C-A1 ® FOUND 5/8' IRON PIN ` to FOUND ALUMINUM CAP O C1 • SET 1/2" IRON PIN 1r1 C� CALCULATED POINT—NOT SET r 1 l BROKEN LINE \ G2- N 86'56'05"W 0.73' �3 GRAPHIC SCALE 52�5 lD 20 (wPEET) t Inrh. 10 II. J.J. HOWARD 10/17/23 CIL iI m /� i a SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 W KALE DRAWL BY: MWINO N0. ..u.,a:m.a,/e,.r aup,o.w,m I" - to' CLS 230406 EXHIBIT B - PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT1 EXHIBIT B - PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT #2 DRAWING SHOWING A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT FOR SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 LYING IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, T.4N., RAW., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2024. CR 2017-072470 23 24 S89'22'30" 2669.54' 26 25 2110-22' T. 559.32' CR 2017-072469 N 1/4 SEC. 25 r• I � N Q l a * N � O QQ �4 Cj V VY 1 LEGEND ` �1 1 1 SECTION LINE LOT LINE t TIE LINE — — — — — — — EASEMENT ® FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN - FOUND ALUMINUM CAP 1 ♦ SET 1/2" IRON PIN 1 CALCULATED POINT—NOT SET l 9ROKEN LINE ` 11 }} BLOCK 5 ` 1Q 1 758 } i5 � I °' 62-�l-Z� U 1 Q OF J. IP�O I 15.00' f Curve Table N86'56'05"W Curve/ Length Radluo Delta Chord Dlractlon Chord Length 23 C4 25.34' 319,63' 4-32' 29- SO'41' 19-E 25.33' Cs 24.10' 140,16' 9'51'05' $1'29'32% 24.D7' GRAPHIC SCALE C6 21.62' 125.16' 9'53'46' NI'2W 12'W 21.59' 5 0 2.5 5 10 20 C7 23.05' 304.63' 4'2D'07' NO'35' 08'W 2104' IF —� Cs 15,04' 256_D1' 3'20'27' N74'51'38'E 15.04' 1~Fffr 1 Hch- 10 It. Uml 20/DATE. — gESI6N5�t. SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 J.J. HOWARD 2/2D/24 CLS ® A ° , /R*q-nw �F' DRAWN�' I DRAWING NO. EXHIBIT B -PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT #2 �,e yQA,Q e�r„r,��yer-a>i 1" s 10' CLS 230408 EXHIBIT B — PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT #3 DRAWING SHOWING A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT FOR SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 LYING IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, T.4N., R.1 W., B.M., CR 2017-072470 ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2023. 23 24 26 25 O oo ' \\ BLOCK 5 N o� 00 �j \ F . r. 'D \ 06 , S89'04'59"E \S'A A• � • 2324.87' J � o \ \ F in \ \`3, u' N \ \9s p Do (n U \ \ uU') \ \ TN 1/16 COR. g \ ILLEGIBLE `S' \ O 18 \ ,•� LEGEND \\ `Ld, SECTION LINE LOT LINE TIE LINE — — — — — — EASEMENT 23 ® FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN FOUND ALUMINUM CAP • SET 1/2" IRON PIN 0 CALCULATED POINT-NOT SET Np J` BROKEN LINE y tC• 15755 , 0 d, IZ-It—Zyp OF J. HO`KP GRAPHIC SCALE 5 0 2-5 5 10 2C ouml;-.��mw. (a FEET) 1 me'. to tL MIE: DE"Bf: SI Of .■•�.•ii\.• J.J. HOWARD 10/17/23 cL 1s � ® /R � 1 1 SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 SAC/SWdW WAL, DRAWW Illy: DFAW ND'1 10' CLS 230406 EXHIBIT B - PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT 3 .fv■ara.a�/rrrisvpodow-aw " - EXHIBIT B — PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT #4 DRAWING SHOWING A PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT FOR SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 LYING IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, T.4N., R.1W., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2023, CR 2017-072470 23 24 26 25 /V NpL 15758 cop °�° Duo C9 S89'21'24"E 6.31' S89'04'59"E OF �0 +0 o r 2643.52' Ln to 1`0o In n F-< I O - ax I l 0 / II GRAPHIC SCALE 5 80 0 40 80 160 320 i I N 1/16 COR. I I c IN FEL1 BLOCK 4 I 1 hrn . 80 n. ILLEGIBLE LEGEND I SECTION LINE d I LOT LINE CN7 I lD RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE d I I TIE LINE O LJ I I — — — — — — — EASEMENT MO Q FOUND 5/8- IRON PIN C14 I M FOUND ALUMINUM CAP O O • SET 1/2- IRON PIN Z I I (f) ® CALCULATED POINT-NOT SET O I I BROKEN LINE I I II Curve Table I I C.I./ Length Rodlue Delta Chord Direction Chord Length I C9 5.73' 28.DO' 11 43'23' N84'46'55"E 5.72' O I I 1 f I II � II t I I N89'27'57"W 12.00' W. DIRECTOR ST. WD 23/ DtCL 1 SAGARRA SUBDIVISION 2 J.J. HOWARD 2/23/2. �L� J� ® ,� ° , 1" � 80 CLS 230408 oRAwtt oRJ3IND EXHIBIT B — PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT 4 .eo�.eera.>t o/ei rr uar pql rrm ' EXHIBIT B — PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT #5 DRAWING SHOWING AN ACHD SIDEWALK EASEMENT FOR SAGARRA SUBDIVISION LYING IN THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 25, T.4N., RAW., B.M., ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, 2023. CR 2017-072470 GRAPHIC SCALE 23 2q S89'22'30" 2669.54' 60 0 40 80 160 320 � � 26 2� 265123' � 16.31' (w Fm CR 2017-072469 _ ea r` o N 1/4 SEC. 25 LEGEND ^ K; SECTION LINE 00 LOT LINE RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE C TIE LINE — — -- EASEMENT Q S89 27'57"E 12.00' g FOUND 5/8" IRON PIN V FOUND ALUMINUM CAP x O • SET 1/2" IRON PIN L6 cli II I N A CALCULATED POINT—NOT SET U 15 Gl I BROKEN LINE a WII z o I I N cliII � W. MALBAR ST. 14 z I I to C17 N 42'18'20"E `T 37.16' v BLOCK 4 NN 80 10 •01 12 13 ,\r0 / -,,-54218'20"W C15 37.18' _ I G1� o C12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- L..I S O O O O 6 7 z O O O I f-N0'37'48"E 12.00' —— — � — — — — — — — — — — S89'25'01"E 762.63' w - - — — — -- — — - - - - m - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 — — — — _. N89'25'01"W 762.64 Curve Table �, d Curve/ Length Radius Delta Chad Dlrectlon Chard Length C s CIO 26.97' 37.00' 41'46'17• S21 25'12"W 26.31T C11 38.21' 79.06' 27'41' 17' S28'42' 14•W 37.84' C12 4.97' 35.59' 8"00'05' S18'51'38'W 4.97' 15758 G13 43-91' 3 67'4Y 15" 556'43'20"W 41.39' C14 29.72'1 25.15'1 67'4Y 15" N56' 4S 20"E 28.02' C15 3.29' 23.59' 8'00'05' N18'51'38'E 3.29' Of A� C16 43.98' 91.06' 27-40'18" N28'41' 45'E 43.55' J. C17 16-23' 25.00' 41'46' 17• N21-25'12'E 17.83' WE DESIGN SUBDIVISION J.J. HOWARD 2/23/24 G�5 J� ® � ° , u4pw/sue sw' MWN 6Y. auvrlc o NO EXHIBIT B — PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY EASEMENT 5 aiu[spxx x[c/W r W 04 M�1a 1" . 80' CIS 230408 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Chase Bank - Eagle Amity Water Main Partial Easement Release (ESMT-2024- 0180) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-004348 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=5 BONNIE OBERBILLIG 01/23/2025 08:13 AM ESMT-2024-0180 CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT TYPE OF EASEMENT BEING PARTIALLY RELEASED: Water Easement GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN GRANTORS: First Meridian Limited Partnership,A Wyoming Limited Partnership, INCLUDING SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WHEREAS, by easement dated July 12 2022 and recorded as Instrument Number 2022-063227 in the land records of Ada County, State of Idaho, an easement of the type and nature set forth in the above-captioned title was granted to the City of Meridian, an Idaho Municipal Corporation("the Easement"),upon the real property legally described therein. WHEREAS, the continuance of a certain portion of the Easement is no longer necessary or desirable. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the City of Meridian does hereby release, vacate, and abandon that certain portion of the Easement on the lands more particularly described on Exhibit A, and depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein. All rights and privileges under the under the above-described document in and to the remaining lands covered by the Easement shall remain and continue in the Grantee and shall not be affected in any way hereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF MERIDIAN has caused these presents to be executed by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized this 21 St day of January ZO 25 CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis n, yor 1-21-2025 d \ Att y ohn�``pFiz�Clerk 1-21-2025 STATE OF IDAHO, ) : ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 1-21-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. (,tnmn) Cha&ycWM CHARLENE WAY Notary Signature _2$_2028 COMMISSION No. 67390 My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Version01/01/2020 EXHIBIT A (LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PORTION OF EASEMENT BEING RELEASED) PROJECT NO.20246074-V EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT AREA TO BE VACATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO AREA TO BE VACATED: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 EAST,BOISE MERIDIAN,COUNTY OF ADA,STATE OF IDAHO, LYING WITHIN LOT 1 IN BLOCK 2 OF FIRENZE PLAZA SUBDIVISION,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 124 OF PLATS AT PAGES 19867-19871,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY,BEING A PORTION OF THAT SEWERAND WATER EASEMENT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO.2022-063227, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;THENCE SOUTH 89°22'53" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1,7.15 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT;THENCE NORTH 00°37'31"EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT,42.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE ALONG THE LINE OF LINE OF SAID SEWERAND WATER LINE EASEMENT THE FOLLOWING THREE(3)COURSES; 1)SOUTH 89°22'29" EAST, 17.75 FEET;2) NORTH 00°37'31"E, 10.00 FEET;3)NORTH 89°22'29" WEST, 17.75 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 00°37'31"WEST, 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE TERMINUS OF THIS DESCRIPTION. CONTAINING 178 SQUARE FEET,MORE OR LESS. �P\ L AND S TER 11871 \o C OF A. H�F F 12/13/2024 EXHIBIT B (MAP DEPICTING THE PORTION OF THE EASEMENT BEING RELEASED) PROJECT NO.20246074-V EXHIBIT 'B' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SEWER AND WATER EASEMENT AREA TO BE VACATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO LOT LINE SAND S T E'? 11871 z w � N N Q m C 0 F 1 211 312 0 24 � CDA. N Q N o N O Z W> N N N z VOS 2 2 - F�REN1E p�PZP 5 z CD vol 1 O 2 m m 0 0 Ln N89°22'29"W 17.75' TERRA - MARK N00°37'31"E 10.00' S89°22'29"E 17.75' POINT OF BEGINNING AREA TO BE VACATED N N N 0 20' 40' w m m 0 0 SCALE 1" = 20' z S89°22'S3"E 7.15' POINT OF COMMENCEMENT AREA TO BE VACATED o SW CORNER LOT 1 CD C? m EAST MOUNT ETNA DRIVE (60'PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY) E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: TM Center East No. 2 Water Main Easement No. 1 (ESMT-2025-0001) ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2025-004316 Project Name or Subdivision Name: BOISE IDAHO Pgs=8 CHE FOWLER 01/22/2025 04:20 PM TM Center East Subdivision No. 2 CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE Water Main Easement Number: 1 Identify this Easement by sequential number if the project contains more than one easement of this type.See instructions/checklist for additional information. For Internal Use Only ESMT-2025-0001 Record Number. WATER MAIN EASEMENT THIS Easement Agreement made this 21 st day of January 20 25 between DWT Investments LLC. BVB Ten Mile Crossing Annex,LLC an nvestments�,("Grantor")and the City of Meridian,an Idaho Municipal Corporation("Grantee"); WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to provide a water main right-of-way across the premises and property hereinafter particularly bounded and described; and WHEREAS , the water main is to be provided for through underground pipelines to be constructed by others;and WHEREAS, it will be necessary to maintain and service said pipelines from time to time by the Grantee; NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to be received by the Grantor, and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantor does hereby give, grant and convey unto the Grantee the right- of-way for an easement for the operation and maintenance of water mains over and across the following described property: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBITS A and B) The easement hereby granted is for the purpose of construction and operation of water mains and their allied facilities,together with their maintenance,repair and replacement at the convenience of the Grantee,with the free right ofaccess to such facilities at any and all times. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said easement and right-of-way unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that after making repairs or performing other maintenance,Grantee shall restore the area of the easement and adjacent property to that existent prior to undertaking such repairs and maintenance. However, Grantee shall not be responsible for repairing, replacing or restoring anything placed within the area described in this easement that was placed there in violation ofthis easement. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees that Grantor shall not place or allow to be placed any permanent structures or obstructions within the easement area that would interfere with Grantee's use of said easement, including, but not limited to,buildings,trash enclosures, carports, sheds,fences,trees,or deep-rooted shrubs. THE GRANTOR covenants and agrees with the Grantee that should any part of the right-of-way and easement hereby granted shall become part of,or lie within the boundaries of any Water Main Easement Page I Version 01/01/2024 public street, then, to such extent, such right-of-way and easement hereby granted which lies within such boundary thereof or which is a part thereof, shall cease and become null and void and of no further effect and shall be completely relinquished. THE GRANTOR does hereby covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized and possessed of the aforementioned and described tract of land, and that Grantor has a good and lawful right to convey said easement, and that Grantor will warrant and forever defend the title and quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THE COVENANTS OF GRANTOR made herein shall be binding upon Grantor's successors, assigns, heirs,personal representatives,purchasers, or transferees of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto subscribed their signatures the day and year first herein above written. [END OF TEXT; SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW] Water Main Easement Page 2 Version 01/01/2024 GRANTOR: DWT INVESTMENTS LLC an Idaho limited liability company By: Brighton Corporation, an Idaho Corporation, It' Hager By: Robert L. Phillips, President STATE OF IDAHO } :sS. County of Ada ) On this 1 4J day of January, in the year 2025, before me a Notary Public of said State, personally appeared Robert L. Phillips, known or identified to me to be the President of Brighton Corporation,the Manager of DWT Investments LLC,the company that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said company, and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seat the day and year in the certificate first written above. l L- Notary Signature My Commission Expires: SHARI VAUGHAN COMMISSION#20181002 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 06/01/2030 GRANTOR: SCS INVESTMENTS LLC an Idaho limited liability company By: &W'4' A4ekl— Michael A.Hall,President STATE OF IDAHO ) :ss. County of Ada ) On this I day of January,in the year 2025,before me a Notary Public of said State, personally appeared Michael A.Hall,known or identified to me to be the President of SCS Investments LLC,the company that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said company,and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in the certificate first written above. DONNA WILSON Notary Signature COMMISSION 067674 My Commission Expires: S— (P ` NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO i GRANTOR: BVB TEN MILE CROSSING ANNEX,LLC an Idaho limited liability company By: BV Executive Management, Inc.,an Idaho Corporation, It's Manager By: Tahri Molifua, ExecutA..Vice President STATE OF IDAHO } :ss. County of Bon nevi lie } On this 2�4—*I"day of December, in the year 2024,before me a Notary Public of said State, personally appeared Tahri Molifua, known or identified to me to be the Executive Vice-President of BV Executive Management, Inc., the Manager of BVB Ten Mile Crossing Annex, LLC,the company that executed the instrument or the person who executed the instrument on behalf of said company,and acknowledged to me that such company executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed by official seal the day and year in this certificate first written above. ot%►Jniw1►rrrr (stamp) .••oroe;�•.,.'P �. Notary Signature �40TARk -1 o ��= My Commission Expires:� __ o PUBLIC ���''qrF OF IC3P�,�'��• rrrrirrrr�nt+«���� GRANTEE: CITY OF MERIDIAN Robert E. Simis ayor 1-21-2025 d l�iiL ERIL7L4N4�- Attest by Chr Johns"` _ Clerk 1-21-2025 STATE OF IDAHO. ) . ss. County of Ada ) This record was acknowledged before me on 1-21-2025 (date) by Robert E. Simison and Chris Johnson on behalf of the City of Meridian, in their capacities as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively. Notary Stamp Below Notary Signature 3-28-2028 CHARLENE WAY My Commission Expires: COMMISSION No. 67390 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF IDAHO Water Main Easement Page 3 Version 0 1/0 1/2024 km- E N G I N E E R I January 2,2025 Project No.:Z2-321 TM Center East Subdivision City of Meridian Water Easement Legal Description Exhibit A parcel of land for a City of Meridian water easement being a portion of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho being more particularly described as follows: Commencing aLan aluminum cap marking the Center 1/4 corner of said Section 14,which bears SOO*35'31"W a distance of 2,656.80 feet from an aluminum cap marking the North 1/4 corner of said Section 14,thence following the easterly line of said Southeast 1/4nf the Northwest 1/4. NOU"35'31°Ea distance of7U5.99feet; Thence leaving said easterly line, N89^24/29^VVa distance of1J7.4S feet tothe POINT 0FBEGINNING. Thence N89'11'30"W a distance of 157.66 feet to the boundary of an existing City of Meridian water easement recorded as Instrument No.2023-069233, records of Ada County, Idaho; Thence following said boundary, NOO^4Q'3O^Ea distance ofIO.O0feet; Thence leaving said boundary,5Q9~l1'3U"Ea distance of1S7.4Afeet; Thence 5DO^lO'S8"VVa distance ofl0.08 feet to the POINT OFBEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 3,151 square feet, more or less,and is subject to all existing easements and/or h8h1s-of+maynf record orimplied. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof. 124 v '*c --7=-=-5----' -- -- ' — - - - ----- s7as North Discovery Way^ Boise, |dahooy7za ~ 208.639.6939~ kmeomj|p.com E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for Foldesi Reserve (H-2024-0055) by Jeff Hatch, located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI AND DECISION& ORDER In the Matter of the Request for Annexation,by Jeff Hatch. Case No(s).H-2024-0055 For the City Council Hearing Date of: 01/07/2025(Findings on 01/21/2025) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7',2025,incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7t'', 2025, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7' 2025, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code (see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 2151,2025, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65, Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019, Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § I I-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7',2025, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 1 - reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for Annexation is hereby approved per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7',2025, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments,if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-613-713). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 11- 6B-7C). Notice of Conditional Use Permit Duration Please take notice that the conditional use permit,when granted, shall be valid for a maximum period of two(2)years unless otherwise approved by the City. During this time,the applicant shall commence the use as permitted in accord with the conditions of approval, satisfy the requirements set forth in the conditions of approval, and acquire building permits and commence construction of permanent footings or structures on or in the ground. For conditional use permits that also require platting,the final plat must be signed by the City Engineer within this two(2)year period. Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with 11-5B-6.G.1,the Director may authorize a single extension of the time to commence the use not to exceed one (1)two(2)year period.Additional time extensions up to two (2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the conditional use comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11(UDC 11-513-6F). FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -2- Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s)and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d),if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of January 7t'',2025. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -3- January 21st By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the ___________ day of ________________, 2025. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENERVOTED_______ COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENTLIZ STRADERVOTED_______ COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLORVOTED_______ COUNCIL MEMBERJOHN OVERTONVOTED_______ COUNCIL MEMBERANNE LITTLE ROBERTSVOTED_______ COUNCILMEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCKVOTED_______ MAYOR ROBERT SIMISONVOTED_______ (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E.Simison 1-21-2025 Attest: _______________________________ 1-21-2025 Chris Johnson City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department, Public Works Department and City Attorney. 1-21-2025 By:___ Dated: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION & ORDER FOR(Foldesi ReserveH-2024-0055)-4- Exhibit A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT {�E DEPARTMENT REPORT REPORT r IDAHO HEARING 1/7/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location ;,�;Area of Impact TO: Mayor& City Council 'I T �= City Limits ,> T I.Tr FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Jeff Hatch o SUBJECT: H-2024-0055 Foldesi Reserve LOCATION: Located at 3915 N.Ten Mile Road in North %of the SE%of Section 34,T.4N., R.1W. � rs �'-: �# 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 3.31 acres of land for the construction of approximately 46,005 square feet of industrial space in the I-L zoning district, By Jeff Hatch. B. Recommendation Staff- Approval with Conditions. Commission: Approval. C. Decision Council: FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Fotdesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -5- COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial/Flex Space - II. Existing Zoning RUT in Ada County VII.A.2 Proposed Zoning I-L Adopted FLUM Designation Mixed Use Non-Residential (MUNR) VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Mixed Use Non-Residential (MUNR) Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 7/16/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/23/2024 Site posting date 12/9/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.D • Comments Received Yes • Commission Action Required No • Access Existing driveway to N.Ten Mile Rd (arterial); Consolidating the 3 access points to a single access point. • Traffic Level of Service Better than E ITD Comments Received Yes Meridian Public Works Wastewater • Distance to Mainline Available at the site. • Impacts or Concerns No Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site. • Impacts or Concerns Yes: Connection to Ten Mile Road and to the water main on the south boundary will be required at time of development. Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions for comments received or see public record https:llweblink.meridianciLy.orglWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=365958&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit X. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -6- STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject property is designated as Mixed Use Non-Residential on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed zoning of Light Industrial(I-L)is consistent with the FLUM. The 1I1. applicant is proposing to construct approximately 46,005 square feet of industrial space and self- storage(storage condos). These uses are listed as allowed in the I-L zoning in the UDC and Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is surrounded by self-service storage facilities as this property is within the proximity of the Cities wastewater plant. Industrial spaces and self-storage facilities are a desired use specified in the Mixed-Use Non-Residential designation, as noted above. These spaces provide employment opportunities and valuable spaces for small-scale industrial businesses. Each user will be evaluated at the time of applying for certificate of occupancy. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History N/A Acreage 3.31 acres B. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The site currently contains seven(7)residential and accessory structures. Prior to the issuance of the building permit,these structures shall be removed. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant has indicated the proposed uses for the site intends to be industrial spaces and self-storage buildings. The use of industrial buildings and self-storage facilities(storage condos) aligns with the Mixed-Use Non-Residential(MUNR) future land use designation, which accommodates a range of commercial and industrial users. This project not only provides employment and industrial options within city limits but also advances the city's economic goals and meets the needs of its residents. Specifically,it complies with Policy 3.07.01D,which promotes the preservation of industrial land by discouraging non-industrial uses and emphasizing light manufacturing,distribution, flex-space, and base employment. Additionally, it aligns with Policy 3.03.01E,which encourages infill development within the city. The property's location adjacent to N. Ten Mile Road enhances its accessibility and supports the local industrial landscape, addressing the demand for such developments in both the immediate area and the wider community. Furthermore, industrial buildings and self- storage facilities are permitted in the I-L zoning district which supports the applicant proposal. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards of the I-L zoning district in UDC Table 11-3B-3.Based on the concept plan and elevations, the applicant is meeting the 35 foot building setback, 50 foot height limit, and has chosen to do a water conserving design to reduce the landscape buffer to 12 %feet along Ten Mile in conformance with the UDC. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -7- 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The applicant has proposed the uses of Industrial space and Self Service Storage Facility but staff is not limiting them to these uses as any allowed uses in the I-L zoning can be established. UDC 11-4-3-34: Storage Facility, Self-Service a. Storage units and/or areas shall not be used as dwellings or as a commercial or industrial place of business. The manufacture or sale of any item by a tenant from or at a self-service storage facility is specifically prohibited. The applicant is proposing the storage faciliovhuilding to be for storage condos which will be for personal use and not for business purposes. b. On site auctions of unclaimed items by the storage facility owners shall be allowed as a temporary use in accord with Chapter 3,Article E, "temporary use requirements", of this Title. The applicant will comply with this if and when this happens at the facility. c. The distance between structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five(25)feet. The applicant meets this standard. d. The storage facility shall be completely fenced,walled,or enclosed and screened from public view. Where abutting a residential district or public road,chainlink shall not be allowed as fencing material. The storage building will have enhanced architecture, and the roll-up doors will screened from public view. This is not a typical storage building as it will be used for storage condos which is a more specialized and heightened use. e. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m.to 11:00 p.m. Not applicable. £ A minimum twenty-five-foot wide landscape buffer shall be provided where the facility abuts a residential use,unless a greater buffer width is otherwise required by this title. Landscaping shall be provided as set forth in subsection I I-3B-9.0 of this Title. Not applicable. g. If the use is unattended,the standards in accord with Section 11-3A-16, "self-service uses", of this Title shall also apply. The applicant will comply with these standards. h. The facility shall have a second means of access for emergency purposes as determined by the Fire Marshal. The fire department has reviewed the concept plan and will work with the applicant on a second means of access. Additional details will be reviewed with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. i. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance. Materials shall not be stored within the required yards. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The applicant is not proposing outdoor storage for the larger self-storage building. j. The site shall not be used as a"vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein defined. The applicant will comply with this standard. k. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand(1,000)feet from a hospital. Not applicable. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -8- C. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Based on the concept plan,the applicant appears to comply with the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-19. The applicant has positioned no more than 50%of the total off-street parking between building facades and abutting streets. Additionally,the building on the southern portion of the site exceeds the 30%building frontage requirement. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Ten Mile Road, an arterial street. This buffer shall be landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. The applicant has chosen to incorporate the water conserving design standards into this buffer which allows the buffer to be reduced by 50%. The concept plan shows a 12 'h foot buffer meeting this requirement. However, the existing landscaping between the sidewalk and Ten Mile Road will be required to be brough into compliance and landscaped per UDC 11-3B-7C. The landscaping will be evaluated with the certificate ofzoning compliance and shall be landscaped per UDC 11-3B-5-2B-0. ii. Parking lot landscaping Landscaping is required to be provided along all parking areas per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8. The proposed landscape plan does not meet the minimum requirements. The south landscape buffer shall be widened to 7 feet and the parking stall shall be reduced to 17 feet. The landscaping will be evaluated with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. iii. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10,the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two(2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees). Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the final plat detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. iv. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along N. Ten Mile Road. 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6 requires one space for every two thousand(2,000) sq. ft. of gross floor area in industrial districts. The applicant is proposing 94 parking spaces on the concept plan which exceeds the 23 spaces that are required with the building(46,005 square feet).Additionally, the applicant anticipates potential commercial users will use portions FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -9- of the site in the future which is why the parking is in excess. The uses will be analyzed as they are proposed within the tenant spaces. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C.Bicycle parking is not depicted and the plans shall be revised to incorporate the location of the bicycle parking with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance submittal that meet these requirements. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Goals 5.01.02C and 2.09.03A of the comprehensive plan promote area beautification and community identity through heightened design standards providing distinct and engaging identities. In response,the developer is proposing three industrial buildings with a mix of one-and two- story tenant spaces comprised of stucco,brick veneer, stucco wainscot,metal panels, and metal panel roofing with moderate to large setbacks from the street,and frontages exceeding the required 20%windows along the streets. Primary entrances are oriented toward the parking lots rather than toward the loading docks. The Architectural Standards Manual requires modulation in the surface plane at no less than 50 ft. intervals. There should be at least 2 pedestrian-scale architectural features,and physical distinctions to anchor the building. There should be at least two different field materials,with at least one accent material. The proposed elevations appear to meet the architectural manual. However,the applicant shall submit the architectural standards manual checklist with the design review application to ensure compliance with these standards. 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The submitted concept plan shows fencing on the Northwest portion of the site but does not provide details. The applicant shall include fencing details with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. D. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Goal 6.01.0213 emphasizes reducing the number of access points onto arterial streets by utilizing strategies such as cross-access agreements, access management, and the creation of frontage and backage roads,while also improving connectivity between local and collector streets. Access is proposed off N. Ten Mile Road(an arterial street)through a single curb cut. The applicant has condensed the three access points to N. Ten Mile into a single access point in the center of the property. This was a requirement from both ACHD and the City of Meridian with this application. While this property was not granted access from the storage facility to the south it was granted cross access from the north for when the storage facility redevelops in the future, staff finds the proposed entrance to be in compliance with the UDC and comprehensive plan. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 10- Additionally, cross-access shall be stubbed to the property to the north and south.While this may not be pertinent in the near term,if or when the storage units redevelop,the cross-access agreement will be essential to limiting access points on Ten Mile. The Meridian Fire Department has requested secondary access to the site. The applicant and staff will work with MFD to find the best location for this before CZC submittal. 2. Multiuse Pathways,Pathways, and Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-5, UDC 11-3A-81 UDC 11-3A-17, Comp Plan): The site has an existing detached 5-foot sidewalk along N. Ten Mile Road which has been determined to be sufficient from the city parks department. Typically, 10-foot detached multi- use pathways are required along arterial and collector roads. However,the 5-foot detached sidewalk was recently constructed, and the parks department deemed it as acceptable at this time. Additionally,the two curb cuts that are being removed shall be replace with curb, gutter, sidewalks, and landscaping with the first certificate of zoning compliance application. There is no pedestrian connection from this sidewalk to the front entrances for any of the suites. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian connection point to the entrances of the suites. If the pedestrian walkway crosses vehicular driving surfaces, it is required to be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth in UDC 11-3A-1913.4. E. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& IV, 3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. A final plat or certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six (6)months of the City Council FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 11 - granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum, incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. c. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application(s) shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for this site. d. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, the applicant shall construct driveway stubs to the north and south property lines and record a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granting accesses to the north (Parcel#S0434417201) and south(Parcel #S0434417605)properties in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Ten Mile Road. Copies of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. e. All existing structures shall be removed from the property prior to issuance of the first building permit. f. The applicant shall consolidate all the access points into a single access point as shown on the concept plan. At the submittal of the first certificate of zoning compliance, the access points being removed shall be replaced with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping in compliance with the UDC. g. The property is allowed to develop with any permitted and conditional uses in the I-L zoning district as represented in UDC Table 11-2C-2. Planning Division comments related to future application submittals: - Provide emergency access to the site as requested by the Meridian Fire Department. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 12- B. Meridian Public Works ANNEXATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • 5ewer Shed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's • WRRF Declining Balance • Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan ■ Impacts/concerns Water • Distance to Water Available at the site. Services • Pressure Zone • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's • Water Quality None • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Pla in • Impacts/Concerns Connection to Ten Mile Rd and to the water main on the south boundary will be required attime of development. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 13- C. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District E F-T F NUV 21 2 !i CITY ur.�►e I ITY LERKSOF Ct ou�c 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA,IDAHO 0851-4-a45 FAX 4=4634DO92 r— oFPICe Ncippa 20&466-7a61 Novernkr 19,2024 SHOP. Nan'Pa XG-466-0663 Chris,Iuhnson,City CIcrk City of Meridian 31 L Broadway Avenue, Suite 102 Mcridian.ID 83 2-2619 RE: H-207AAOMI Foldesi Roeiwv;3915 N.Ten Mile Road To Whom It May Concern_ Providing a]I dorm drainage is rciainnd on-site Ihcrc will be no impact to Nampa&. McI-!diort Irrigation District(WID).Therefore,no further review will be required at this 1inm- If gU surface drainage leaves the site, NMID requires a filcd Land Use Change Application for review prior to final platting. All privalc littorals and wraslc ways roust be nr-plcctrd. It is recommended that irrigatiolti water be available to all developments within NMID- Developers roust comply Adth Idaho Code }1- 3 805- Please call with any further questions at(208)466-0663. Sinccrcly, 5tc"T Paadcw Development Coordinator Nampa& Meridian Irrigation District SPI gnf Cc; Officel File . I. r APPRC7. MAHIRRIG,SREMRES D. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 14- ACHDAkHisP-kknm,0rin3g, missident Miranda Cad,VkvPrasldeM ]im an�,rmmissiono-r Kent GaldtherM,Cemmftomr Cw.%McKinrWy.[pmm14rr1pnrrr Date:October 21,2024 To;Jeff Hatch and Steve Thiessen, Hatch Architecture and Design Staff Contact:Sam Stsndal,Assistant Traffic Engineer Project Description: Foldesi Reserve RA Trip Generation. This development is estimated to generate 223 vehicle tripd per day. 23vehicleIrips per hour in the PM peak hour,based on the Institute ofTranspi�,tatior, Engineers Trip Generation Manua1,11thedition_ Development If yes,is mitigation required Area Roadway Level of Meets Planned Serviceet ACHID'sg M yes Livable Street Performance Measure5 Area roads will rneetACHD's • Thfes holds the future with Pl2nned Is Tra nsft Available? Yes NO Comments As this application is for annexation and rezone only,the tables above reflect existing conditions without the proposed project This table will be updated to reflect the development and its impact as part of a future development application- connecting you to more FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 15- FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: V. 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the Applicant's proposal to annex 1 acre of land with I-L zoning for the development of 46,005 square feet of industrial buildings is consistent with the General Industrial FL UM designation for this property. (See section III above for more information.) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment to I-L and conceptual development plan generally complies with the purpose statement of the I-L district in that it will encourage industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are operated entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures and is accessible to an arterial street(i.e. Ten Mile Road). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The City Council finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed industrial use should be conducted entirely within a structure. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The City Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the city. vi. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommend approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement. B. Commission: B. The Meridian Planning &Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5th, 2024. At the public hearing, the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subec annexation request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Steve Thiessen and Jeff Hatch b. In opposition: None c. Commenting: Steve Thiessen and Jeff Hatch d. Written testimony: None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 16- f. Other Staff commenting on aplication: None 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony a. None 3. Ke. ids) of discussion by Commission: a. None 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. The applicant will no longer pursue storage condos as they do not want to provide secondary access. The building will be used as industrial flex space allowingfor or andpermitted in the zone. C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on January 7th, 2025. At the public hearingthe Council moved to approve the subject annexation requests. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Jeff Hatch and Jared Sherburne b. In opposition:None c. Commenting:None d. Written testimony: Robi Foldesi e. Staff presenting application:Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Ka issue(s)of public testimony: a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 17- EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps (link to Project Overview) 1. Aerial Vll. Legend Project Location , i Area of Impact 0 Analysis �7' d!°03+r9�.Imp'l It w�. 4At� I� 1 is MXA[i!��r iC 8:9� Ca rw T- r t?1 R RW CM l0R99l�1 was - "�R ylf as z a.l.:w -}ARi.}. -_L► !�R C s= w ��J V Fy��� +' ,!� FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) - 18- MCMI�L-L-AN p f 1 IAI fl11L-` ��- IlEE■�an■♦ �� ■ aaaaaaaE _ �1111111■ Ir/�.��f•- ���� - Ini'1!■/♦ �arr■■■tl ulmuu - ueur '-hut,inr� ■ tllllnlr =°�,_-nl►�= lulry♦ • •ram, ■�► _�,,:, � e jl■nn a==man`I � nui 'i'1+G'. unllr ♦_ T. unreal++ �:� laar IIOIn.�►�1yi11nls �:ul 111j♦ +!■�aarnn:■ lilt c mu■n _ ► 9�itrlyi , �I ar 1 � ��i� � � -1 !t •• 1 •# ■■■lint rub !i➢aoa __ _ ., �� — ►i rr�ti Irk *u■long ,wl�u •rr .-�r, r _� �■n�as � � ��r#p# �G fl"1jr1:' .hQAa r+rrr�rr ryA 1■�Il�t rn Q rrU 1 ilr ,a ♦ ilk�I��®�+s ►`,r" L■ #A � ♦ �ME r rr INr♦� I��ila. aorta ■Illrrfl•r�.1►p ♦ w "r■ F. r11,ap IItI/a1111'I�IIIII/ llt�lllf�r f,�' ffix Ti■--■ Of Illaa.;;llflttrAl Q rr ► / r rr .puu S.":Z 1 II� wturnu\O ■ +► � Irk�aL1lrlrrrl•r! �#���1111/� �i: .ia�•��J V non rr �nm/♦i ■. 5 lr•�� von■dal ++��nr>,++ �� . -'r; � lr111►�G I,� ♦ �w n n■ur d �b �nnrlrr . ♦ n■n , m •1N �jrrnpr �}�a}� �faa�i♦�� L rS rr � �r fl i� ♦�♦ II/r y� nrumnm ��4 p�:iaaa aa■ :�=61■r 1�■1 iiiiiiii: .1r]_ y♦♦ir rii '.u;+' ' ' 1==: nuu �:rlr lt,� ♦#rNar� +' USTICK .. It IIP/ rnno■ra riaiu a n - .111 111 * �.. ■rr■a :s—�rl it f .. Z , u real f O it uuan nn ■ rr a■■o ■•i uur r:''♦ W -�n1■bra nri� ::::1►a�*nr■■n rem►�f ■ nrr�\fir'\ 4..�. � rr rw rq IA�r'aw:::::I,1♦.y■rnn►♦ • 1 liar/♦ � � ■ rR♦err■r.r■ ♦ / ■■■mq +♦i nuul �r ■nr bi�♦ rr■n �.■ar< • �it♦ .w..... r■.■ •1 F ■ rut■-- �hua • �♦+♦•, ■ ■■■■■a►♦ ♦ ♦ a �■■O r■r■11• ♦ ■�w r.■M f ♦lrn�����I'1■�,/'+/ww 'R�iinr•i_■nwn�Q : Off,!►f 1■■r. + �area■ ■rap ii:ii:w■ r . ■ r.■:r ��, -■ �• Imo ' •■1�n un■a ■ Ir■uum �`.���:::w: �1♦ j*1 'inr ■■ w nu�i ■ o uum■,� rrr ■■nuu■ rr:::aauuuw■ � ■■■�■w■. • s ��4 lraQ innu■1:/i �* . I ern r■■■■ ■■■. . .� •unnnan rasa Illllrrr•�♦ pre lira^■n■■tau!n■■nn■■■rll� ■■■ ■■■■■.■:w. . . \Ilrll rfffllJ► rairrun *,� a■urrq.qunulfur,t:m •...i.■. :: �s � 1 nnnmaaanr4 �: a m■n. a a!! L aa■rj r i ■�■.o: ■ • ••r■■$ a► �InL ar+rrrn•►�aOfL�ls .��rb1�4*���•ri q'�:.■. �■ •• �t0 ■ arI1 11 No IN •:r adarrru■ �a� pfrll�y N P r•r :w': V ♦•♦ .• ■aaaaa �♦ w�: nuurn aa+��■ a 4=I ►1♦ ♦y■�R w�- - +1 1 ■�,nll Jelinski■■I - - _ uun r■ �narnn -'unrlll! Ir/7'�= -- � �_-� !nErl irr ♦ � ■�aaawar -• • •• 1 - iunm■ :: r �__ � ■nnu R�`� filanr,�nr tlllllllr ' r;-_.ilr■� �Il -4.�•,r� n1r1ry • �OF Fall Illlllr 1111 I ■!t . .! Ra ' ' • - ��1■nl� ����un�1l _ lit \ IREN�■/ rT l� isiison• u�iiii _ /in► nlunl►� nn O n+�r / r1� ���■ ■�.■m• - - ;:�' r nllr � � Vr r/a: r•• � q# ■laaaar!u►� ium 5 ♦ v n ■n �rl ` 1#1+S �rllllf i i �• I ■ PP11 rr1 401 T i - Ilrglr �•1\ �w ■i►�r !hr♦j. ♦ �i. ua � F• na.a u1 rw a #1 nr a*luau l#1 .■ Jp'yt IY �G gllirlr aunnrr rl� ■.:..�. p V r.1 1111rr r■r■/y♦i�� all, p alarr :riy ♦wow::oil, 1Z.1 t J �G� III I> r� rt■■■. J r �` w� ♦ ♦ ■�■ =uuu • n r lal W ium 111t■Irnl■I ■■! a♦ a � :art uuu J I rn mup C 1,;1 rllttttt.. Ny++ USTICK , . � ran■uran� ,� +ul ?��.'■'w��tl li � a■r■ �;■a��'anrnliiq�■w,♦♦liii�r� �fir"� ■��■a m l aunm yZ ,�n iq w rw nuu■■r■■rnq■■ ::a ��. �-� r �. y r._ a rn� ■■■■+qR■�*n■■■rr ��n p ��� �i�i�.P t■■■nl a\r'rv. W i i a111 i\ w R w:... r•-�R .nrra► r ri un■uii>r1'a� m i r■■r _ rr♦`M■■r r.:>•tar �enfaw::::I ♦rr'rannr :.unnl r� !r f■■■r■r ♦ bl+hi /AR■■■ now1■flaa w o■■ ♦ �,u o non ♦ ■■ ■. sno rr:■lr► rr■. r:y; ♦Ln�■nu■■r1••i w.•■nl■ �■nnara ■ +r a i w f�. •1 r '■'w■r■ ■ ■■ rnm ■y i ran".■■al a a.f■ri w~ .�■ru■nr�+j• a. `i�■■ 1 a::. R �♦ '%.. :p ■ ■ liar��rt■� ■■uru a�•i�j1�'-.�unu L,r.■•■arauu ■. :r'i is:7■! � • w "'�!■.�4a1� nnnrrl�/n • �I• {aa ��■uuu■ n::•aaaaa '•.. ar...■....•i r \ rhrr■annu Brae IIIIIIII� ns linn"■n o■ra�•a■■rem r■■•.■.■■■ y\ • auarllnnnnunnn fff'lljl, ulpnn ,`a♦ .■unq+unuu iii •i•••aip� '■ �rurmn'rr9 - • - • :wi i y aa�•�fwomen will��3�srf►iy � raw ♦ AI N •' r 1- 1 � 11 ' 4. Planned Development Map LegendI 4 Project Location Area of Impact T=' City Limits Planned Parcels ® _I ® I OAnalysis 1 1 k � _ 1 1 - k L I k I I I f I I I o END Dill -- � �rI ' LIJliJj_iS',h7 I� HIE � �— �� Lu o o ® raE p I L FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -20- B. Subject1 1 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER . .�•. � al+.a It - -__ OR 1 1' ' 00 C. Service Accessibility Report overall Score: 1 5th Percentile Description �. Lccation Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft. from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. RED Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration #of lanes in maste, -t -,-t= GREEN plan) matches existing of lanes) School Walking Proximity From 112 to 1 mile walking YELLOW Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Wa I ka bility Park within 112 mile OR a Neighborhood Parkwithin GREEN 1/4 mile walking FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -22- A Site Plan(date: 9/20/2024) SUE RECAP ..mu«iwx 46r�p� --`---- yr iv.v.acv u,arr�coroa - - - ----_------- Qk BUILDING - BUILDING SYMBOL LEcan I� ■ $ RUIIDNC ARCH RECAP m .. _. u r imp, � Q• O il � 1 s - _ ,- D BUILDING I .� k i AREA RECAP Aft 0 -----------------=„tea.;_-----------�_ . -- QD A L0 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -23- E. Building Elevations(date: 10/31/2024) DMTV-)R FINISH S tec. SPECIIICAmms Fi -M m ®8 If b _..... k. o u - u O J — o O w ow f o - -- ❑ -- u ��o ❑ o; -- i A 4.0 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -24- A� IXT[RIOR FINISH �® SPCC:IRICATIONS $gg4'Y kg� 7 7� Pm TI,; Fra P I P f. m 1 Ll W m W O 0 . J m ® ocp W 3 �... wco 1111L. IL 20 = [Ell r A 4.1 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -25- F. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map RDURR Prajoet Noc 240333 Datc:October 10,2024 Pagc 1 of 1 ANNE XAT10N DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the N112 of the SETA of Section 34,Tcwnship 4 North,Range 1WesL Boise h+lerim are City of Mrridian_Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: CObIMIF 4UNG at the sou&wmst corner of said Section 34;thence,along the cast bourdary of thc HIM, Al N.01r5759'E,198ZR3 fectto the south boundary of said NV2 ntthe SE114 and the POINT OF BEC MING:thence,akw g said boundary, 11 N,B?'W10'W_,425A6 hmt;thence,leaving said boundary_ 2] N-0105730'W_,333_11 hxt;thence, 34 SW 16!15'E.441-57 feet to said cast boundary of the SE114;thence,alorkg said boundmy, 4) S_00°52'59-M-=76ftotto the PONTOF04351NNNCi C NTAI NIf4Cs_3.31 Aam& gpW`i' t 4 13765 /11 F :9t',_Cr03j-ar�'•1'oy \anr7.ID03•_U I 201.44-63 : •+ww,3rdrra:am FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -26- ANNEXATION EXHIBIT SKETCH LOGATED IN THE N 112 OF THE SE 1 f4 OF SECTION 34, T(YWNSHIP4 NORTH,RANGE 1 MST.BOISE FAERIDIAN_CITY OF MERIMN IE f'DA GCAATrY,InAJHO 20241 C 34 35 g ►a9tilV3+-f ZH7.70' If a ¢ I ` ANNEXATION PARCEL 1Kr 8.31 ACRES R S w � M � to z� to o w � v 13765 " 34 a5 f� {T° W.USTIM ROAD -"�O�Ilkti�`• 3AEfG-F�jME41GUK 'iq!'1 HI!'; i /V DU 332 IL 9ROAOMDRE WAY NAMPA IQArep E]!#7 309-042i M' 700 I "B -allmRA.GpA FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR(Foldesi Reserve—H-2024-0055) -27- W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Net-Zero Budget Amendment in the Amount of$20,000.00 for Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health, Inc. Grant Supporting Park and Pedestrian Improvements within the City of Meridian 1/2/2025 2:50 PM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Personnel Costs Full Time Equivalent(FTE): C—N, Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total E IDIAN%-_'' 01 1840 41200 5046 Wages 01 1840 41206 5046 PT/Seasonal Wages 01 1840 41210 5046 Overtime Please only complete the fields 01 1840 41304 5046 Uniform Allowance highlighted in Orange. 01 1840 42021 5046 FICA $ Amendment Details 01 1 1840 42022 5046 PERSI $ TitleAue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Park&Pedestria 01 1840 42023 5046 Worker's Comp $ Department Name: Mayor's Office 01 1 1840 1 42025 5046 JEmployee Insurance $ Presenting Department Name: Mayor's Office Total Personnel Costs $ Department#: 1840 Operating Expenditures Primary Funding Source: 01 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description One-Time On-Going Total CIP#: 01 1840 85000 1 5046 Grant Expenditures $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Project#: 5046 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ Is this for an Emergency? [ Yes ❑ No 01 1840 5046 $ New Level of Service? ❑ Yes ❑ No 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ Clerks Office Stamp 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ 01 1840 5046 $ Date of Council Approval 1-2 1-2025 Total Operating Expenditures $ 20,000 $ $ 20,000 Capital Outlay Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Acknowledgement Date 01 1840 1 5046 9aAaiA Mi2eia. 1/2/2025 01 1840 5046 01 1840 5046 Department Director 01 1840 5046 REVIEWED 01 1840 5046 �By Todd Lavoie at 9:08 am,Jan 03,2025 01 1 1840 5046 1 Chief Financial Officer Total Capital Outlay $ - Revenue/Donations Approved Luke Cavener via email 1/6/2025 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Cou i ' ._ n 01 1840 33100 5046 Grant Revenue $ 20,000 �4-_01 1 1840 1 1 5046 1 /�/ 1-7-25 01 1 1840 1 1 5046 1 Mayor Total Revenue/Donations $ 20,000 Total Amendment Request $ - City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form C:\Users\rortizmiller\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\37HBWWD6\Budget Amendment-Blue Cross Community Health Academy Grant-1 2 2025 1/2/2025 2:50 PM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Total Amendment Cost-Lifetime Prior Year(s) Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Department Name: Mayor's Office Funding 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Title:,lue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Park&Pedestria Personnel $ - $ $ $ $ Iostiviensfer Submitting Budget Amendments: Operating $ 20,000 $ $ $ $ ➢ Cep-true It will send Amendment with Directors slgrature to Finance(Budget Manager)for review Capital $ - Flrance:vi I send Amencment to Council Liu son fc--signature Total $ - $ 20,000 $ $ $ $ >Council Liaison will send signed Amendment to Mayor Total Estimated Project Cost: $ 20,000 > Mayor will send signed Amendment to Finance(Budget Manager) Evaluation Questions > Finance(Budget Manager)will send aopr-ed copy of Amencment to Depa itment Please answer all Evaluation Questions using the financial data referenced above. > Departxert-11 add•_c ; •f A-J„e, m-or.nr l 4,q­a r,rg M—icore Agenda Manager 1. Describe what is being requested? Donated revenue received through the Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health,Inc.for the Mayor's participation in their Community Health Academy to be used for the purposes of supporting park and pedestrian improvements within the City of Meridian. 2. Why was this budget request not submitted during the current fiscal year budget cycle? Program participation and funding allocation was outside of normal budget preparation/process. 3. What is the explanation for not submitting this budget request during the next fiscal year budget c cle? Program participation and funding allocation was outside of normal budget preparation/process. 4.Describe the proposed method of funding? If funding is split between Funds(i.e. General,Enterprise,Grant),please include the percentage split. List the amounts and sources of anticipated additional revenue that will result from approval of this request. r Donated revenue. 5.Does this request align with the Department/City's strategic plan? If not,please explain how this request was not included in the Department/City strategic plan? Yes. 6. Does this request require resources to be provided by other departments? If yes,please describe the necessary resources to be provided by other departments. Potential for staff time as soft costs to administer the funds to allocated projects. 7.Does this Amendment include any needed Equipment or Software that will utilize the Cit 's network? Yes or No No 8.Is the amendment going to result in the disposal of an asset?(Yes or No) No 9.Any additional comments? Total Amendment Request Every effort should be made to avoid reopening the budget for an amendment. Departments will need to provide back up and appear before the City Council to justify budget amendments. Budget amendments are intended for emergency or mandatory changes to the original balanced budget. Changes to the original balanced budget may cause a funding shortfall. City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form C:\Users\rortizmiller\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\37HBWWD6\Budget Amendment-Blue Cross Community Health Academy Grant_1 2 2025 Docusign Envelope ID:22F87D1F-540C-40FB-95F5-7342627E17FC 1bBlue Foundation , Cross of Idaho for Health, Inc. GRANT AGREEMENT Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health,Inc.(the"Foundation")is pleased to award Cite of Meridian(the"Grantee")with a Foundation Grant(the"Grant"). The Grant is awarded subject to the terms and conditions stated in this Grant and any exhibits or attachments thereto. Please read the terms and conditions of the Grant carefully before signing this document as the Grantee's signature constitutes the Grantee's agreement and acceptance in full of all terms and conditions contained herein. I. AMOUNT AND ADMINISTRATION OF AWARD Subject to the terns and conditions set out in the Grant,the Foundation is pleased to award Grantee with a conditional Grant of up to Twenty Thousand Dollars($20,000),which shall include any interest or income arising therefrom(the"Maximum Grant Amount"). The Grant is conditional upon the proper execution of this Grant agreement by an authorized representative of Grantee. 2. PURPOSE AND USE OF GRANT FUNDS The Grantee shall utilize Grant funds exclusively fbr the one of the following purposes:charitable,educational,scientific or literary purpose(or some approved variation)as more fully described in section 170(c)(2)(B)of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically. Grantee's purpose of all Grant funding from the Foundation is to support park and pedestrian improvements within the city of Meridian. The Grantee agrees that Grant funds shall not be disbursed to any unrelated third-party organizations, entities,or vendors without the express, written approval of the Foundation. The Grantee agrees to make its books and/or records pertaining to the Grant available to the Foundation at reasonable times. 3. INDENIN IFICATION In consideration for the issuance of Grant funds, the Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Foundation and its directors,officers,employees,agents,parent company and affiliates harmless from and against all allegations,claims,actions, suits. demands, damages, liabilities, obligations, losses, settlements, judgments, costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and costs)which arise out of or relate to the Grant,or result from any act or omission of Grantee arising from projects funded through or related to the Grant to the extent permitted by Idaho law. 4. GRANT TERMINATION It is expressly agreed that any use by the Grantee of the Grant proceeds for any purpose other than those specified above or if in the Foundation's sole judgment, the Grantee becomes unable to carry out the purposes of the Grantor ceases to be an appropriate means of accomplishing the purpose of the Grant,the Foundation may terminate the Grant at any time at its sole option. In the event of termination under this section,any outstanding Grant amount payable shall be cancelled. Now THEREFORE,the parties have read, understand and accept the terms and conditions stated in this Grant agreement. The individuals signing this Grant agreement represent and warrant that they are duly authorized to be bound by its terms.The parties do hereby execute this Grant agreement effective on the date that the BCI Foundation signs the Grant agreement. City of Meridian Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health,Inc. ("Gran "Authorize R presentative) By: By: —� Title: Robert E. ' son, Mayor City of Meridian Title: ?AAAA `1Je, Date: 12-10-2024 Effective Date: 12//��/�2,� Attest: 8.15.2022 Chris Joh " on,Ci 12-10-2024 i W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of$12,000 for Meridian Historic Preservation Commission's Historic Preservation Plan 1/3/2025 11:49AM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Personnel Costs Full Time Equivalent(FTE): Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total E IDIAN�--' 20 1840 41200 1 5045 Wages 20 1840 41206 5045 PT/Seasonal Wages 20 1840 41210 5045 Overtime Please only complete the fields 20 1840 41304 5045 Uniform Allowance highlighted in Orange. 20 1840 42021 5045 FICA $ Amendment Details 20 1 1840 42022 5045 PERSI $ Title: Historic Preservation Plan 20 1840 42023 5045 Worker's Comp $ Department Name: Historic Preservation Commission 20 1 1840 1 42025 5045 1 Employee Insurance $ Presenting Department Name: Parks&Rec Total Personnel Costs $ Department#: 1840 Operating Expenditures Primary Funding Source: 20 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description One-Time On-Going Total CIP#: 20 1840 53801 1 5045 Historic Preservation Plan $ 12,000 $ 12,000 Project#: 5045 01 1840 53801 5045 CLG Match $5,500 $ $5,500 01 1840 53801 11159 5 500 $ - 5 500 Is this for an Emergency? ] Yes ] No 20 1840 5045 $ New Level of Service? ] Yes ] No 20 1840 5045 $ 20 1840 5045 $ Clerks Office Stamp 20 1840 5045 $ 20 1840 5045 $ 20 1840 5045 $ 20 1840 5045 $ 20 1840 5045 $ 20 1840 5045 $ 20 1840 5045 $ Date of Council Approval 1-21-2025 Total Operating Expenditures $ 12,000 $ $ 12,000 Capital Outlay Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Acknowledgement Date 20 1840 5045 20 1840 5045 1/3/2025 20 1840 5045 Department Director 20 1840 5045 REVIEWED 20 1840 5045 By Todd Lavoie at 4:52 pm,Jan 06,2025 20 1840 5045 Chief Financial Officer Total Capital Outlay $ - Revenue/Donations Approved Luke Cavener via email 1/6/2025 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Co on / 20 1 1840 33100 5045 1 Historic Preservation Plan $ 12,000 C� 1-7-25 20 1 1840 5045 20 1 1840 5045 1 Mayor Total Revenue/Donations $ 12,000 Total Amendment Request $ - City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form C:\Users\ssiddoway\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\PSQES19R\FY2025-budget-amendment-Historic Preservation Plan Grant 1/3/2025 11:49AM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Total Amendment Cost-Lifetime Prior Year(s) Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Department Name: Historic Preservation Commission Funding 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Title: Historic Preservation Plan Personnel $ - $ $ $ $ Instruction far Submitting Budget Amendments: Operating $ 12,000 $ $ $ $ > Depa tmert will send Amerdment with Directors signature to Finance(Budget Manager)for review Capital $ - > Finance:will send Amendment to Courcil Lia son fc-signature Total $ - $ 12,000 $ $ $ $ D Council Liaison will send signed Amendment to Mayor Total Estimated Project Cost: $ 12,000 >Mayor will send signed Amendment to Finance(Budget Manager) Evaluation Questions ➢ Flra nce(Badget Maragsr)Sri 11 send approved copy of Amencment to Department Please answer all Evaluation Questions using the financial data referenced above. > Departirertv:illodd cc jy ofArr2n:l,»cn.to COL nal rg 1,I—Loc 2 Agerda Manager 1. Describe what is being requested? This request is for spending authority of the State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)Certified Local Government(CLG)grant for $12,000 that was awarded to create an updated Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Meridian.We have an executed agreement for the grant.We will also use$5,500 of the HPC consulting budget 01-1840-53801-11159)for this project, totaling a$17,500 project. 2. Why was this budget request not submitted during the current fiscal year budget cycle? The grant was not awarded with an executed contract during the budget cycle. 3. What is the explanation for not submitting this budget request during the next fiscal year budget c cle? This project must begin work this fiscal year,as per the grant expectations and project timeline. 4.Describe the proposed method of funding? If funding is split between Funds(i.e. General,Enterprise,Grant),please include the percentage split. List the amounts and sources of anticipated additional revenue that will result from approval of this request. NET ZERO BUDGET AMENDMENT.This will by funded with$12,000 from the SHPO grant,and with$5,500 of the current HPC consulting budget(01-1840-53801-11159). 5.Does this request align with the Department/City's strategic plan? If not,please explain how this request was not included in the Department/City strategic plan? Yes.This project is an update to HPC's 2014 plan.SHPO recommends that we create an updated plan every 10 years. 6. Does this request require resources to be provided by other departments? If yes,please describe the necessary resources to be provided by other departments. Yes.Planning Staff will need to help identify current code,regulations,plans related to historic preservation,and help to create some GIS maps.No more than a 3-5 hours of planning staff time. 7.Does this Amendment include any needed Equipment or Software that will utilize the Cit 's network? Yes or No �rNo 8.Is the amendment going to result in the disposal of an asset?(Yes or No) L No 9.Anv additional comments? This is a NET ZERO budget amendment Total Amendment Request $ 0 Every effort should be made to avoid reopening the budget for an amendment. Departments will need to provide back up and app ear before the City Council to justify budget amendments. Budget amendments are intended for emergency or mandatory changes to the original balanced budget. Changes to the original balanced budget may cause a funding shortfall. City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form C:\Users\ssiddoway\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\PSQES19R\FY2025-budget-amendment-Historic Preservation Plan Grant CLG-2024-06 IDAHO CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office ("SHPO"), a division of the Idaho State Historical Society, and Meridian (UM 026-451-367 ("Grantee"), effective as of the date of final signature ("Effective Date") and relates to a project to be undertaken by the Grantee, with financial assistance from a National Park Service ("NPS') matching grant in aid program (Assistance Listing No. 15.904 -- Historic Preservation Fund Grants-In-Aid; Federal Award Identification Number: loV,^_) supporting the Certified �[J Local Government ("CLG") and National Register of Historic Places programs in Idaho, administered by SHPO. The National Register of Historic Places program was established by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and is administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. The SHPO and the Grantee agree as follows: 1. Application, Project Description and Budget. Grantee submitted an Application (Attachment A) for Historic Preservation Plan_("Project") for FY24. SHPO has reviewed the Application and has determined that SHPO will provide a matching grant in aid from the National Park Service to assist Grantee with a portion of costs related to the Project as described in Attachment B ("Project Description"). Grantee hereby agrees to carry out the Project work as described in Attachment B within the budget set forth in Attachment C ("Project Budget"). All funds provided by SHPO for this Project srre4.be federal funds from the National Park Service. No state funds shall be used under this Agreement. 2. Period of Performance. The Idaho Certified Local Government Grant program period shall begin 1 October 2023 and end 30 September 2026. Work under this Project shall commence after the Effective Date and shall be completed no later than 30 September 2026. Prior to the Certified Local Government incurring expenses on this Memorandum of Agreement, a fully executed copy of the MOA must be in place. 3. Allowable Costs. Allowable Project costs are for items described in Attachment B and are included within the Project Budget set forth on Attachment C. Allowable Project costs must be documented to the satisfaction of SHPO and determined by SHPO to: a. Meet federal requirements as set forth in the Office of Management and Budget Guidance Property Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Rules, 2 C.F.R. Part 200, and any amendments thereto; b. Be allowable under the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, State, 1 CLG-2024-06 Tribal, Local Plans & Grants Division, Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual (]Line 2007), https;z[www.nps.00y/Oros/1623/hpf-grant-manual..htrn; c. Be necessary and reasonable for the completion of the Project; d. Have been incurred for the Project during the Period of Performance as described in Section 2 of this agreement; and e. Meet the Project description outlined in Attachment B. 4. Project Payment. Upon successful completion of the Project as described in Attachment B, Grantee is awarded 12 000 in CLG Grant funds, Grantee agrees to contribute cash or donated services to the Project in the minimum total of $12,000 or 50% of eligible Project costs, whichever is less. Upon SHPO's verification of successful completion of the Project by Grantee, Grantee may submit a request for reimbursement by SHPO. With prior approval from SHPO, Grantee may request partial reimbursement from SHPO after the completion and acceptance by SHPO of each completed milestone activity for the Project, as agreed to by SHPO and Grantee. All bills submitted must include supporting fiscal documentation detailing the federal and non-federal share of Project costs. Reimbursements will be made by SHPO for expended funds only. Grantee's final request for reimbursement shall include a comparison of completed activities and budget to those in the approved Project Budget. Grantee agrees to maintain all financial and administrative documents and records pertaining to the full Period of Performance of this grant as described in Section 2 of this agreement for a period of not less than five (S) years after completion of the Project. S. Procurement of Personnel and Services. a. Grantee shall comply with the United States Office of Management and Budget Guidance Property Standards Rules, 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.310 through 200.327, and any amendments thereto, for soliciting supplies, equipment and other services. At a minimum, all procurement transactions, regardless of whether by sealed bids or by negotiation, and without regard to dollar value, shall be consistent with the requirements of 2 C.F.R. §§ 200,310 through 200.327, and any amendments thereto. Procurement procedures shall not restrict or eliminate competition. Written selection procedures shall include, at a minimum, the following procedural requirements: I. Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description shall not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition, The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product, or service to be procured. When necessary, descriptions shall set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards necessary to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided, if possible. When a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements is impractical or uneconomical, a"brand name or equal" description may be used as a means to 2 CLG-2024-06 define the performance or other salient requirements of a procurement. The specific features o` the named brand which must be met shall be clearly stated. ii. Clearly set forth all requirements which must be fulfilled and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals, such as a deadline for completion of the Project. iii. Contract awards shall be made only to responsible contractors that possess the potential ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of the proposed procurement, Consideration shall be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. iv. Contract awards shall not normally be made to a contractor or professional who has developed or has drafted bid specifications, requirements, a statement of work, an invitation for bids, and/or a request for proposals for a particular procurement. If formal advertising does not result in any acceptable bids, Grantee or subgrantee may negotiate with any available contractor, Including the contractor who produced the bid requirements. b. Procurement shall be made by one of the following methods: (1) small purchase procedures; (2) competitive sealed bids (formal advertising); (3) competitive negotiation; or (4) noncompetitive negotiation. Evidence of competitive negotlation for professional services and/or formal advertising must be forwarded to SHPO to evidence compliance with federal procurement requirements prior to disbursement of funds; C. Grantee shall include all of the of the terms and conditions of Attachment D ("Required Conditions for CLG Subagreements") of this agreement in any and all agreements between Grantee and any consult or contractor. 6. Project Supervision, Grantee agrees to ensure that work performed related to the Project conforms to Attachments B and C, to all appropriate guidance documents from SHPO, and to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation, 48 Fed, Reg. 44,716 (Sept. 29, 1983), avai able at ht ps://www.nps.goy/subiects/historicpreseryation/standards.litrn. 7. Interim Reports and Requests for Reimbursement. Grantee shall submit to SHPO interim fiscal and programmatic reports in compliance with the schedule set forth in the SHPO, Idaho State Historical Society, Idaho Certified Local Government Grant Manual, available at: httr)s://history.idaho.Qov/clg/. Reimbursement requests can be made for federal funds at the completion of the Project. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Project, 100% of the federal grant award must be requested, Grantee shall contact SHPO immediately in writing if any situation arises that will affect the 3 CLG-2024-06 timely or successful completion of this Project, 8, Indemnification. To the extent not prohibited by Idaho law, Grantee shall indemnify, defend, and save harmless the State of Idaho, SHPO, and the Idaho State Historical Society, its officers, agents, and employees from and against ail liability, claims, damages, losses, expenses, actions, and suits whatsoever, including injury or death of others or any employee of the contractor or subcontractor caused by or arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of Grantee in the performance, act or omission of any term of this Agreement. 9. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be amended without the parties' prior written agreement. Any major alterations, increases, or decreases in the Project or any :hanges to the Project Budget must be submitted in writing for review and approval to SHPO at least 30 days In advance of the proposed Project commencement date and in accordance with the requirements detailed in the SHPO, Idaho State Historical Society, Idaho Certified Local Government Grant Manual, available at. https://Iiistorv.idaho.gov/cia/. SHPO will endeavor to respond to requests for review and approval in writing within 15 days of receipt. 10.Attachments. All attachments referenced herein and attached hereto are incorporated into the terms of this Agreement. 11.Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon fifteen (15) days'prior written notice. Should this Agreement be terminated by SHPO, except for reasons of non-compliance by Grantee, SHPO will reimburse Grantee for up to 100% of the eligible costs incurred up to the termination date. Should this Agreement be terminated by Grantee, SHPO, at its.sole and absolute discretion, may reimburse Grantee for up to 100% of the eligible costs incurred prior to the termination date, or may require Grantee to return any or all federal funds transferred to Grantee prior to the termination date, depending upon the circumstances of the termination, 12.Special Conditions. The Idaho State Historical Society reserves the right to include any additional special conditions on this Agreement as outlined below: 4 CLG-2024-06 a. Meridian shall provide a copy of any Request for Proposal or other solicitation for consultant services for review and approval by the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office; b. Meridian shall provide the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office a copy of an executed contract with a contractor for completion the Meridian Historic Preservation Plan project prior to any work being done, said contractor meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards: Federal Register Vol. 62, No, 119, p. 33719, 1997 (36 CFR part 61) in at least one (1) of the following fields: Architectural History; Historic Architecture; Historic Preservation; Historic Preservation Planning; or History; c. All drafts of the HP Plan shall be submitted to SHPO staff in Word format (no PDFs); d. The Meridian Historic Preservation Plan must include an acknowledgement of the National Park Service, as outlined in the Idaho Certified Local Government Grant Manual; e. Meridian shall submit an in-progress draft of the HP Plan to SHPO staff on or before 31 January 2026 for review and comment; and f. Meridian shall submit a completed draft of the HP Plan to SHPO staff on or before 31 May 2026 for final review and approval. ID HO STATE H _T RICAL SQdETY: Janet Ga nore, Executive Director Da Idaho State Historical Society Idaho State Historic Preservation Officer GRANTEE: Cit of Meridian 8-27-2024 Name Date Robert E. Simison Print: Title: Mayor, City of Meridian Authorized RePresentativ�for grrltee Attest: f 1 A C*1_5s ,lohnson, Me' ian Qfty Cleric 8-2 -2024 5 CLG-2024-06 ATTACHMENT A: APPLICATION ';fof_I Idaho State Historic Preservation Office PRESERVATION Ur-F'ICF Certified Local Government Subgrant Application - /M i�nesc.i irocnrr FY2024 Application Coversheet Applicant/Local Government Name: Meridian Historic Preservation Commission (MHPQ Address: 33 East Broadway Ave. Address; Meridian, Idaho 83642 Telephone; UEI No.: 028-451-367 City/County Staff Contact Name: Cassandra Schiffler, Meridian Arts and Culture Coordinator Address: 33 E Broadway Ave, Ste, 206 Address: Meridian, Idaho 83642 Telephone: E-mail: Grant Coordinator (if different from City/County Staff Contact) Name; Address: Address: Telephone; E-mail: Budget Summary Total CLG Grant request: $15,000 _ Total Matching share: $12,500 Total cost of all project(s): $27,500 Sources) of match: _$2,500 MHPC cash; $10,000 In kind staff/volunteer hours Please provide a more detailed budget breakdown on the attached budget form. Authorization The undersigned certifies that he/she is authorized to apply for this subgrant on behalf of the local government, to commit local matching funds to the project, and to enter into a contract If the subgrant is awarded. (/;' Signature: Date: Ai y -ounty Chief lent official's signature Print: Robert Simison Title: City of Meridian, Mayor FY2024 CLG Subgrant Application: Cover Sheet Projects Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Meridian Applicant: Meridian HPC Part A: Proposed Project Project Description Complete a separate Part A: Project Description for proposed project. Please state the objectives, the work to be performed, how the project relates to the goals set forth in the Idaho State Historic Preservation Plan, how the project relates to any local goals or objectives,and how the project will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standares. The Meridian Historic Preservation Commission(MHPC)wishes to create an updated Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Meridian, The City of Meridian has experienced tremendous growth and is now the second largest city in Idaho.In times of rapid growth, historic sites and buildings can often be neglected or demolished.It is important that the history of Meridian continues to be responsibility preserved and protected.The City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan supports creative opportunities which allow historic resources to remain in active and productive use while maintaining their historic character.Towards that goal,the city has a Historic Preservation Plan.The current Plan was crafted in 2014.As it is coming up on the ten-year-old mark,and as recommended by SHPO,it is now an advantageous time to update the plan and make it more robust. To accomplish this goal,the MHPC plans to contract with a professional historic research consultant who is trained and experienced in this area. The consultant will work with the City and the Historic Preservation Commission to deliver a complete Historic Preservation Plan that meets all requirements,is within the budget,and is delivered in the agreed to time period.Once those goals are accomplished,the project will be complete. This project is in direct alignment with the Idaho Stale Historic Preservation Plan's stated goals.The Plan will create a local preservation plan to help ensure that Meridian decision makers and the general public are informed and knowledgeable about historic preservation issues,practices,and opportunities;it will create an opportunity for people to take an active role in historic preservation efforts;it will help efforts to transition into the 21st century through current best practices and technologies, and it will provide the financial support to ensure historic preservation efforts locally.This plan will follow the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for historic preservation,and will fulfill the MHPC's mission to to preserve the character and fahric of historically-significant areas and structures within the City of Meridian to honor and preserve its rich heritage for future generations. Final Products CLG grant projects should result in a tangible product. Provide a detailed and specific list of the expected final products. Typical products include but are not limited to survey reports and forms; published document(e.g. walking tour guide); a National Register nomination; or similar. In some cases, the product may be an activity like a lecture or workshop. A short narrative describing the event must be submitted to the SHPO at the completion of the project. The narrative will describe the number of people attending, who composed the audience, and whether the project was carried out according to the proposal. The final product of this project is an updated Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Meridian,The final plan will include,at a minimum:an introduction: a history of Meridian;an overview of relevant regulations,codes,laws;an overview of the National Register of Historic Places and a list of locally recognized sites;an overview of the CLG program;a SWOT analysis;a recommendation for Vision, Goals,Objectives,and Strategies for future preservation efforts; an implementation plan:and a community input survey.The plan would be presented and recommended to City Council to approve and adopt. The MHPC is currently working on an RFP for the plan,and a current version of the draft RFP is attached to this grant. FY2024 CLG Subgrant Application: Part A Project: Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Meridian Applicant: Meridian HPC _ Timetable Provide an anticipated timetable for carrying out the proposed project. Include significant milestones such as project commencement, issuing of Rl public engagerrent events,any necessary approvals, and projected completion. March 2024-SHPO notifies applicants of grants awarded or not awarded April 2024 -RFP for Historic Research Consultarl to complete a Meridian Historic Preservation Plan issued May 2024-HPC reviews RFP applications,selects historic research consultant June 2024 contract negotiated with consultant September 1,2024 Project Start dale,dependert on SHPO receiving its notice of funding from the National Park Service September 2024•July 2025:consultant to create updated Meridian Historic Preservation Plan,monthly in-progress reports will be sent to MHPC.Completed first draft due by July 1,2025 August 2025:-i PC review of draft September 2025:HPC shall submit a final copy of the Historic Preservation Plan to SHPO ('September 1,2026 Final projects and reimbursement request due,as per SHPO guidelines) Key Staff/Personnel Provide a list of the key staff or pursonnel who will be Involved in the proposed project, including a brief description of the roles and responsibilities for each member. Any anticipatec subcontractors to be hired can simply be Identified as such (e.g. -"consultant," "architect,""bjilding contractor,"et cetera). Cassandra Schiffler,Meridian Arts and Culture Coordinator:City Staff-coordinate and manage contracting,marketing logistics, documentation,ensure all deliverables are met Meridian Histcric Preservation Commission.review and approve work completed by consultant,assist consultant with any volunteer tasks as needed for plan Patrick Gittings,Meridian Historic Preservation Commissioner:Lead Project Manager for HPC Historic Research Consultant:research.write,and complete the Historic Preservation Plan Brian McClure,City of Meridian Long Range Planner:Review plan and answer any questions from the Historic Research Consultant Attachments (Surveys, A&D, reprinting) Attach any additional documents in support of th s project application. Note: some project types have required attachments; please refer to Chapter vll of the Idaho CLG Grants Manual for details on these requirements. Have you included any/all attachments for the project? Yes IfNo FY2024 CLG Subgrant Application: Part A Project: Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Meridian Applicant: Meridian HPC � Part B: Project Budget Applicant: Meridian HPC Project: Historic Preservation Plan for the City of Meridian Provide a breakdown of the budget items for this specific project. Include hourly or daily rates for professional fees, costs for specific project items, and any associated travel costs. For any cash matches from the Applicant, please include the source of the matching money(e.g.-CDBG,Idaho Heritage Trust,private donation,et cetera). Item Federal Local Match Total Share Cash In-Kind (Cash match from Meridian HPC budget 2500 2500 (Estimated volunteer time from HPC commissioners 3000 3000 Estimated City Staff administrative support time Ili 7000 7000 0 I 0 0 0 I I 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 Subtotals 2500 10000 Totals 0 12500 12500 FY2024 CLG Subgrant Application: Part B Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft 1. Introduction The City of Meridian has experienced tremendous growth and is now the second largest city in Idaho. In times of rapid growth historic sites and buildings can often be neglected or demolished. It is paramount that the history of Meridian continues to be responsibly preserved, protected, and experienced, not just remembered. The City of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan supports creative opportunities which allow historic resources to remain in active and productive use while maintaining their historic character. Towards that goal, the city has a Historic Preservation Plan. The current Plan was crafted in 2014. As it is coming up on the ten-year-old mark it is advantageous to update the plan and make it more robust. 2. Project Description The city wishes to update the existing Meridian Historic Preservation Plan 2014.The new plan will be effective for 10 years and meet the requirements of the Certified Local Government Program (CLG) as well as other requirements.To accomplish this goal,the city plans to contract with a professional consultant who is trained and experienced in this area. The consultant will work with the city and the Historic Preservation Commission to deliver a complete Historic Preservation Plan that meets all requirements, is within the budget, and is delivered in the agreed to time period. Once those goals are accomplished, the project will be complete. 3. Project Schedule and Deliverables The project schedule and deliverables are established by the CLG Grant Program agreement between the City and SHPO. This agreement requires; rDeliverable Description/Comment Historic Preservation Plan The consultant will work with the city and the HPC to deliver a complete Historic Preservation Plan per requirements, Monthly progress reports The consultant will provide HPC with monthly updates including progress against requirements. Schedule I • The Consultant will begin work on or before September 1,2024, • The Consultant shall submit a droft of the [Historic Preservation Plan]to HPC on or before July 1,2025,for review and comment, • The City of Meridian shall submit a final copy of the [Historic Preservation Plan) to SHPO staff on or before September 30, 2025. All related project The consultant may produce documents or data related to this project which shall artifacts become the property of the city. fSummary of all project At the end of the project,the consultant will present a summary report of all work work products completed to the Historic Preservation Commission. Page 1 of 8 Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft a. Project Area The project area for the project shall include the City of Meridian,and its area of impact.An area of interest shall also include the Old Town district of the city. s. Staffing and Budget The city anticipates an approximately 12-month timeline and a consultant project budget of $17,500, not including printing cost or in-kind volunteer and staff hours. Per the agreement between the City and SHPO,the financial breakdown of the consultant budget is as follows: CLG grant: $15,000 Local cash match: $ 2,500 Consultant Budget: $17,500 The consultant budget includes all tasks in the scope of work,deliverables, and consultant travel. The selected consultant will conduct activities identified under the tasks listed below and ultimately produce the preservation plan. The City is the ultimate client of the consultant.The funding is provided by SHPO's CLG Grant Program, and primary oversight will be provided by the Historic Preservation Commission and City Staff. Key staff and personnel in this project include: Meridian Arts and Culture Coordinator: coordinate and manage contracting,marketing, logistics, documentation, ensure all deliverables are met Meridian Historic Preservation Commission: review and approve work completed by consultant, assist consultant with any volunteer tasks as needed for plan City of Meridian Long-range Planning: Review plan and answer any questions from the Historic Research Consultant Historic Research Consultant: research, write, and complete the Historic Preservation Plan 6. Scope of Services The Historic Preservation Plan shall include: I. Introduction —The Purpose of the Preservation Plan a. Meridian's rich history and its contribution to the community b. The importance of historic preservation in maintaining Meridian's character c. The need for an historic preservation plan II. Regulations, Programs&Management a. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 b. Federal government's responsibility to protect historic resources c. Partnership with states,tribes, and local governments Page 2 of 8 Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft III. National Register of Historic Places a. Recognition of historic properties b. Listing on the National Register IV. Certified Local Government Program a. Partnership between local,state,and national governments b. Assistance for local historic preservation efforts V. History of Meridian a. Settlement and development linked to irrigation b. Establishment of canals and irrigation districts c. Growth of agriculture, fruit orchards, and dairy industry d. Meridians history with minority groups such as Chinese, Hispanic, and Indigenous populations. e. Transition from rural center to urban community VI. Historic Preservation Accomplishments a. Establishment of the Historic Preservation Commission b. Meridian's designation as an Idaho Heritage City c. Certified Local Government status d. Historic resources surveys and documentation e. Use of maps, charts,tables, photographs, and illustrations VII. Public Survey and Community Outreach a. Summary of issues and concerns from the public, qualified experts, the HPC, County and City government boards,and Idaho SHPO. VIII.Current Historic Preservation Tools and Conditions; SWOT analysis IX. Vision, Goals, Objective, and Strategies for future preservation efforts a. Investigate current incentive programs in the City of Meridian and other cities. b. Recommendations for Historic Preservation Districts in Meridian c. Recommendations for educational programs to expand the public's awareness of historic preservation. X. Implementation Plan with priorities and resources XI. Reference information XII. Maps and surveys XIII.Survey of National Register of Historic Places Nomination Forms XIV.Historic Sites Inventory 7. Required Activities Research the City of Meridian's current municipal code, zoning regulations, building code,ordinances, design review guidelines and standards, policies, and programs regarding historic preservation. Make recommendations for additions and improvements. Perform a thorough SWOT analysis. Explore new policies and regulations that will maintain historic neighborhoods as livable, affordable communities. Research the step-by-step process for restoring a historic building in Meridian. Page 3 of 8 Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft Develop recommendations so that the City of Meridian is helping, not hindering the process of preservation and restoration of buildings and sites. Investigate current incentive programs in the City of Meridian and other cities. Make recommendations about tax incentives,grant programs,and other financial incentives available to maintain and rehabilitate historic structures Research the process that building owners must go through to restore a historic building.Talk to ovrners of historic properties to ensure the process is working. TAG has identified two areas that are potentially eligible for the national historic register.The report should be documented,with recommendations on next steps. Survey community and other interested stakeholders to ascertain interest in historic preservation Develop a step-by-step process for owners of historic buildings.Create an awareness program. Make recommendations for incentivizing preservation instead of demolition,and develop a realistic, integrated workflow to implement within or modifying the existing development review process. Interview building owners who preserved or restored a building in the city of Meridian and make recommendations. s. Contract Type The selected proposer(s) will be required to execute a professional services agreement with the City of Meridian that includes a not-to-exceed cost.Terms will be negotiated with the successful consultant.The contract period for the services contemplated by this RFP is expected to be through September 30, 2025.The terms of the contract shall commence upon the awarding of the contract.The successful consultant will be required to provide general liability insurance. 9. Qualifications and Evaluation The selected consultant must meet the minimum qualifications in at least one of the following fields as outlined in the draft revisions to the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards that were published in 1997(also referred to as Notice 1997). Additionally, the grant agreement between the City of Meridian and SHPO specifies that a professional in one of the following professions must be selected to prepare the Historic Preservation Plan for Meridian. Special preference will be given to Historic Preservation Planners. • Architectural History • Historic Architecture • Historic Preservation Planning • Historic Preservation • History Page 4 of 8 Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft Standard for Architectural Historian (a) The applicant, an employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in Architectural History or a closely related field of study(see Academic Background for Architectural History), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Architectural History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Architectural Historians); or (b) An undergraduate degree in Architectural History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for Architectural History), plus a minimum of four (4) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Architectural History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians). Standard for Historical Architect (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a State Government-recognized license to practice Architecture, plus, a minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects); or (b) A Masters of Architecture degree with demonstrable course work in Architectural Preservation, Architectural History, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, or a closely related field (see Academic Background for Historic Architecture), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Historic Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects); or (c)A Bachelors of Architecture degree with at least one year of graduate study in Architectural Preservation, Architectural History, Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Planning, or a closely related field (see Academic Experience for Historic Architecture), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods and practices of Historic Architecture that enables professional judgments to be made about the evaluation, documentation, or treatment of historic structures in the United States and its Territories; and Page 5 of 8 Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historical Architects). Standard for Historic Preservation Planner (a) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a State Government-recognized certification or license in Land-use Planning, plus, minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Historic Preservation Planning that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, protection, or treatment of historic and archeological properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservation Planner); or* * *. (b) A graduate degree in Planning with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation, or a graduate degree in a closely related field of study with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation (see Academic Background for Historic Preservation Planning), plus a minimum of two (2)years of full-time professional experience applying the theories,methods,and practices of Historic Preservation Planning that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, protection, or treatment of historic and archeological properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservation Planner); or* * *. (c) An undergraduate degree in Planning with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation or an undergraduate degree in a closely related field of study with demonstrable course work in Historic Preservation (see Academic Background for Historic Preservation Planning), plus a minimum of four (4) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Historic Preservation Planning that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, protection, or treatment of historic and archeological properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservation Planner). Page 6 of 8 Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft Standard for Historic Preservationist (3) The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in Historic Preservation or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for the Historic Preservation discipline), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Historic Preservation that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic and prehistoric properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservationists); or * * *, (b) An undergraduate degree in Historic Preservation or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for the Historic Preservation discipline), plus a minimum of four (4) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of Historic Preservation that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification,evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic and prehistoric properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historic Preservationists). Standard for Historian (a)The applicant, employee, consultant, or advisor will have a graduate degree in History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for History), plus a minimum of two (2) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories,methods,and practices of History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians); or* * * (b) An undergraduate degree in History or a closely related field of study (see Academic Background for History), plus a minimum of four (4) years of full-time professional experience applying the theories, methods, and practices of History that enables professional judgments to be made about the identification, evaluation, documentation, registration, or treatment of historic properties in the United States and its Territories; and products and activities that demonstrate the successful application of acquired proficiencies in the discipline to the practice of historic preservation (see Documenting Professional Experience for Historians). See full details in the proposed Professional Qualification Standards document(Notice 1997), which is available online at: l ttp°;:[/www ncptt nps. ov/arkicles/r:?a/sai «rofFssional qu]Irflcotion-standards[ It is important to note that,as per the definitions,a year of full-time professional experience need not consist of a continuous year of full-time work but may be made up of discontinuous periods of full-time or part-time work adding up to the equivalent of a year of full-time experience. Page 7 of 8 Meridian Historic Preservation Plan RFP Draft 10. Evaluation and Selection Proposals should demonstrate a clear understanding of the project and provide a summary of the team's qualifications, examples of successful projects, and proposed deliverables. Proposals should not exceed 20 pages and must include the following items: 1. Provide a cover letter, including a brief history of your firm, key personnel, and background experience, as well as a narrative addressing your interest in the project and your understanding of the anticipated work identified in this proposal. (20 points) 2. Please provide a detailed scope of work incorporating the tasks identified in the RFP, as well as a timeline for deliverables. (20 points) 3. Provide a detailed resume for all individual professionals you will have available for this project, if selected - including education, expertise, and experience. Please identify any partners, consultants or sub-contractors.(20 points) 4. Please list relevant and similar studies you have completed. Include the following: . Project description a. Conclusions and recommendations b. Start and completion dates c. Names of project personnel involved d. Project owner contacts— name, title and current phone numbers (20 points) 5. Please provide three (3) references from recent historic preservation planning engagements of similar size and scope, with name, title and current contact information.(10 points) 6. Please provide an itemized budget not to exceed $17,500. (10 points) The Historic Preservation Plan Subcommittee of the HPC and City Staff will perform the RFP evaluation. 11. Directions for Submission To be completed by Purchasing. Applicants will submit via BONFIRE application. Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION CLG-2024-06 ATTACHMENT C: PROJECT BUDGET(S) Project *1: Historic Preservation Plan ITEM_ FEDERAL$ LOCAL$ TOTAL $ 12,000 2500 14,500 10,000 10,000 TOTAL $12,000 $12,501 $24,500 CLG-2024-06 ATTACHMENT D: REQUIRED CONDITIONS FOR CLG SUBAGREEMENTS The following conditions must be included in any subagreement between the Certified Local Government and any consultant or contractor: 1. Consultant shall complete all work related to this project in accordance with the most recent version(s) of all applicable United States Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation; 2. All billable costs from the Consultant for reimbursement to the Certified Local Government shall be allowable under the most recent version of the United States National Park Service Historic Preservation Grants Manual; 3. Consultant shall complete all work related to this project in accordance with the most recent version(s) of all applicable guidance documents from the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office, including, but not limited to: Consulting with the Idaho SHPO; IHSI Manual of Instruction for Data Entry; ASI Manual of Instruction for Data Entry; the Idaho Certified Local Government Grants Manual; and any other appropriate guidance documents as identified by the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office; 4. Consultant shall complete all work related to the project in accordance with the Grant Agreement between the Certified Local Government and the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office; 5. Consultant shall make all revisions or modifications to submitted project materials as required by the Idaho State Historic Preservation Office. E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement between the City of Meridian and Endurance Holdings, LLC for Disassembly, Transport and Ownership of Historic Double Silo Barn Components C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Consent Agenda From: Mike Barton, Parks &Recreation Meeting Date: January 21, 2025 Presenter: Consent Agenda Estimated Time: Consent Agenda Topic: Agreement For Disassembly, Transport and Ownership Of Historic Double Silo Barn Components Background: Per the conditions of approval for H-2023-0045, Endurance Holdings is required to save a Double Silo structure that is located on their property. The attached agreement that was prepared by our Legal team defines the process by which Endurance Holdings will fulfill this condition. Council Action: Approve this agenda item authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached agreement AGREEMENT FOR DISASSEMBLY, TRANSPORT,AND OWNERSHIP OF HISTORIC DOUBLE-SILO BARN COMPONENTS This AGREEMENT FOR DISASSEMBLY, TRANSPORT,AND OWNERSHIP OF HISTORIC DOUBLE-SILO BARN COMPONENTS ("Agreement") is made effective this day of __, 2024 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City"), and Endurance Holdings LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Developer"). City and Developer may be collectively referred to as "Parties." WHEREAS, Developer owns property located at 820 S. Black Cat Road, in Meridian,Ada County parcel no. S 1215325450 ("Property"), a 27-acre parcel that was formerly the site of Black Cat Farm, which included an historically significant double-silo barn structure, built in approximately 1917, as generally depicted in Exhibit A ("Barn"), which Barn is also owned by Developer; WHEREAS, Developer filed with City application no. H-2023-0045, requesting Annexation, Rezone and Preliminary Plat approval for Farnstone Crossing Subdivision, to be built on the Property; WHEREAS, Vanguard Way, a road necessary to serve the subdivision, will be extended and constructed where the Barn currently sits, and the Ada County Highway District has determined that it would be unsafe for the road to be constructed around the Barn or in another location; WHEREAS, Developer has agreed to disassemble the Barn; and to label, package, and move its components, including the beams, trusses, framing, chutes, steel bands, and bricks ("Components") to the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department's maintenance facility, located at 1700 E. Lanark Street, Meridian, Idaho, and to place them in an area in the outdoor yard of the maintenance facility to be identified by the Park Superintendent("Facility"); WHEREAS,with this condition, on May 7, 2024, Meridian City Council approved the annexation of the Property into Meridian; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is intended to establish the terms and conditions of such disassembly and storage of the Components, and the Parties' respective responsibilities regarding same; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: I. DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITIES. A. Move Components to Facility. Developer shall disassemble, label, package, and move the Components from the Property to the Facility, at Developer's sole expense. B. Convey ownership of Components. Developer shall convey to City ownership of the Components. The transfer of ownership shall occur upon Developer's delivery of all Components to Facility. AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND OWNERSHIP OF DOUBLE SILO COMPONENTS PAGE 1 C. Convey lot. Within thirty (30) days of recording of the final plat for the Property, Developer shall convey to City a parcel in the southeastern part of the Property ("Lot"), which Lot shall be of adequate size to reconstruct the Barn using the Components and to provide required setbacks. Developer's conveyance and City's ownership of the Lot shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Unless and until the Barn is reconstructed on the Lot, Developer shall be responsible for maintenance of all portions of the Lot. Maintenance shall include proper irrigation, pruning, pest control, and replacement of any and all required landscaping and vegetation. 2. When the Barn is reconstructed on the Lot, Developer shall be responsible for maintenance of all portions of the Lot exclusive of the Barn. Maintenance shall include proper irrigation, pruning, pest control, and replacement of any and all required landscaping and vegetation. 3. At all times, Developer shall keep the Lot free of any and all nuisance conditions, at Developer's sole expense. 4. Prior to acceptance of the Lot, City shall order a Commitment for Title Insurance covering the Lot. At closing, City shall purchase a title insurance policy, in the insured amount of the market value of the Lot. Developer shall either directly pay the title company fbr such policy, or within thirty (30) days of City's mailing of invoice, Developer shall reimburse City for the cost of such title insurance policy. 5. At Developer's sole expense, Developer shall obtain a professional market value valuation of the Lot and shall provide such valuation to City. 6. The instrument conveying the Lot shall be a warranty deed and shall provide that: a. If the Barn is not constructed on the lot by December 31, 2034, the Lot will revert to Developer or to Developer's successor in interest. In such event, the City shall prepare and convey a quitclaim deed conveying the Lot to Developer or to Developer's successor in interest. b. Unless and until the Barn is reconstructed on the Lot, Developer shall be responsible for maintenance of all portions of the Lot. When the Barn is reconstructed on the Lot, Developer shall be responsible for maintenance of all portions of the Lot exclusive of the Barn. Maintenance shall include proper irrigation, pruning, pest control, and replacement of any and all required landscaping and vegetation. At all times, Developer shall keep the Lot free of any and all nuisance conditions, at Developer's sole expense. c. Developer will convey good title to the Lot, and shall certify that the Lot is free and clear of: 1) Any liens or other encumbrances, other than those required by City; 2) Any lawsuits, condemnation proceedings, administrative proceedings or environmental investigations, either pending or threatened; 3) Any special assessments or other obligations or improvements; 4) Any parties in possession of any portion of the Lot as lessees, licensees, tenants at sufferance or trespassers; 5) Any other occupancy agreements or other contracts, written or oral, express or implied; 6) Any pending or threatened violations of any applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, statutes, rules, or restrictions; AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND OWNERSHIP OF DOUBLE SILO COMPONENTS PAGE 2 7) Any hazardous material, substance or waste, whether liquid, solid, gaseous or otherwise,whether located in,upon, or under the Lot; 8) Any ground or surface waters or water courses, whether on or under the Lot, which make impracticable reconstruction of the Barn on the Lot; and 9) Any prior use for storage, disposal, manufacture, generation, whether as a by- product or otherwise, of any hazardous or toxic substance. d. If, at any time prior to December 31, 2034, City discovers any defects in the conditions enumerated above City may, in City's sole discretion, prepare and convey a quitclaim deed conveying the Lot to Developer or to Developer's successor in interest. 7. Developer shall pay all closing costs and/or costs related to the conveyance of property under this Agreement. If City incurs any such costs,within thirty(30) days of City's mailing of invoice, Developer shall reimburse City in the amount of such costs. 8. The obligations of City under this Agreement are, at City's sole option, subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions: a. Developer's representations and warranties are true, complete, and accurate as of the date of this Agreement and as of the date of closing. b. Developer has perfonmed all obligations, covenants, and agreements to be performed before closing as set forth in this Agreement or as may be necessary. c. A title company is prepared to issue a title insurance policy to City in accordance with the provisions of section I.C.4 of this Agreement. D. Certifications. Developer hereby certifies that, except as may be disclosed in writing to City before closing: 1. To Developer's knowledge, Developer is not required to obtain the approval or consent of any person, firm, or other entity to pen-nit Developer to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 2. To Developer's knowledge, Developer owns and possesses all rights, title, and interest in and to the Components and the Lot. 3. There is no equitable, legal, or administrative suit, action, arbitration, or other proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting Developer, the Components, or the Lot. II. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES. A. Acceptance. Upon Developer's delivery of the Components to Facility, City shall accept the Components and ownership thereof. Upon such acceptance, City shall bear all costs, risks, and responsibilities of ownership of the Components. B. Storage of Components. Following City's acceptance of the Components, City shall own and may store the Components at Facility. The Parties acknowledge that the Components may be stored outdoors, without cover, and on an unimproved surface. II. GENERAL TERMS. A. Term. This Agreement shall be effective as of the Effective Date, and shall remain in effect until all December 31, 2025, or until Developer's completion of all responsibilities set forth in this Agreement,whichever is later. AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND OWNERSHIP OF DOUBLE SILO COMPONENTS PAGE 3 B. Assumption of risk. Developer acknowledges that provision of services under this Agreement may carry a risk of injury, illness, and/or death, some of which risks may be unknown, and, with that knowledge, Developer hereby assumes all such risks and hazards. C. Indemnification. Developer shall fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend and City from and against all claims, demands, actions,suits, damages, liabilities, losses, settlements, judgments, costs, expenses (including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees), or injury to persons or property, whether or not involving a third party claim, which arise out of or relate to any act or omission of in carrying out Developer's responsibilities under this agreement. The limits of Developer's insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City; and if City becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits herein provided due to the actions or omissions of Developer or Developer's employees, agents, contractors, or invitees, Developer covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or liability to persons or property. D. Insurance. Each party shall obtain all necessary insurance as may be required in order to protect its respective insurable interests as may be related to its rights and obligations described within this Agreement. E. Waiver. Developer waives and releases, on behalf of Developer and Developer's heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and/or personal representatives, any and all claims and recourse against City, including the right of contribution for loss and damage to persons or property arising from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to Developer's performance of this Agreement, whether such loss or damage may be attributable to known or unknown conditions, except for liability arising out of concurrent or sole negligence of City or its officers, agents or employees. F. Compliance with law. Throughout the course of this Agreement, the Parties shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state, and local laws. G. State of Idaho requirements. The following provisions, as applicable, are required by Idaho law. The terms used in this provision shall have the definitions as set forth in the respective Idaho Code provisions. 1. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2346, Contractor certifies that Contractor is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of this Agreement engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under Israel's control. 2. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-2359, Contractor certifies that Contractor is not, and for the duration of this Agreement will not be, a company currently owned or operated by the government of China. H. Time of the essence. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations agreed to hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a breach of this Agreement, by the party so failing to perform. I. Binding on Successors. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors, administrators, executors and assigns of all parties hereto. AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND OWNERSHIP OF DOUBLE SILO COMPONENTS PAGE 4 J. Non-waiver. No waiver by either party operates as, or is to be construed as, a waiver in respect of any failure, breach, or default not expressly identified by an express, written waiver, whether of a similar or different character, and whether occurring before or after that waiver. No failure to exercise, or delay in exercising, any right, remedy, power, or privilege arising from this Agreement operates as, or is to be construed as, a waiver thereof; nor does any single or partial exercise of any right, remedy, power, or privilege hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy, power, or privilege. K. Third-party beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it in any way be interpreted or construed to create, any third-party beneficiary rights in any person or entity not a party hereto. L. Assignment. Neither party shall sell, transfer, or assign its interest in this Agreement without first providing written notice to the other party. M. Notices. All notices, demands and requests required or desired to be given under this Agreement must be in writing and shall be deemed to have been provided as of the date such writing is mailed, via U.S. Mail, prepaid and addressed, if to Developer to Endurance Holdings LLC, 1977 E. Overland Road, Meridian, ID 83642 or, if to City, to Meridian City Clerk, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, 83642. N. Entire agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties. This Agreement supersedes any and all statements, promises, or inducements made by either party, or agents of either party, whether oral or written, and whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. The terms of this Agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except upon written agreement signed by both parties hereto. O. Agreement governed by Idaho law. The validity, interpretation, performance and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3, of the Idaho Constitution. Venue shall be in the courts of Ada County, Idaho. P. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. Q. Exhibits. All exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference and made a part of hereof as if the exhibits were set forth in their entirety herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first written above. DEVELOPER: Endurance Holdings LLC AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND OWNERSHIP OF DOUBLE SILO COMPONENTS PAGE 5 • k By: 'Corey Barton, Member , Endurance Holdi g LLC CITY: City of Meridian ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor 1/21/2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 1/21/2025 AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND OWNERSHIP OF DOUBLE SILO COMPONENTS PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A f. ,i�•',. .,� � �41 �' J ;a J.' .fin EAST ELEVATION rJ 7N a z'. - �, �. . �. .. ''fcA,f�t✓Y_rMr l�i�R�: a � I ��;�,iJr r+vvz�. �'. 1. f�_IL'.1' .I: 1•• y"tt�. MMI '�. �• I... 1• ,R/737'ai uJ�lad�aJr. naTrtii.c.i�...�zL�tr.-� .'�xz7 ,—._i..:.�'.. .1 .M..•.. WEST ELEVATION • East elevation has a rectangular opening for a window and a rectangular, three lite, side-by-side window near the roof • West elevation has a flush wood door and rectangular picture window • North and south elevations have a silo on each side • Silo walls are comprised of vertical, interlocking concrete staves, bound on the outside with iron hoops • Building connecting the silos is wood frame and has a concrete foundation and a driveway AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORT AND OWNERSHIP OF DOUBLE SILO COMPONENTS PAGE 7 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Memorandum of Agreement for Contribution to 2025 Concerts on Broadway Between the Meridian Development Corporation and the City of Meridian MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR CONTRIBUTION TO 202-5 CONCERTS ON BROADWAY This MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR CONTRIBUTION TO CONCERTS ON BROADWAY (`'Agreement") is made this I lth of December, 2024 ("Effective Date"),by and between the City of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City'). and Meridian Development Corporation, an urban renewal agency organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("MDC"). WHEREAS, City and MDC desire that the plaza at Meridian City Hall serve as a place where members of the community can gather to enjoy downtown Meridian and to take part in the arts; WHEREAS, in the summer of 2025, the Meridian Arts Commission will present Concerts on Broadway, a series of live; outdoor performances to be held in the Meridian City Hall plaza; and WHEREAS, MDC is willing to contribute to City ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) toward expenses related to the presentation of the Concerts on Broadway series; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: I. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES. A. Concert production. Between May 1, 2025 and September 30, 2025, City agrees to present at least three (3) free outdoor concerts at Meridian City Hall plaza as part of the 2025 Concerts on Broadway series. Such concerts will include live musical performance, and may include an opening act,food vendor(s),amplified sound,and limited chair seating. The selection of staff and/or vendors for Concerts on Broadway shall be made by City. B. Publicity. City shall publicize the 2025 Concerts on Broadway series, which publicity may include distribution of information via written and broadcast media, social and online media, e-mail,posters,and a banner displayed at Meridian City Hall. Decisions regarding the time, place, and manner of such publicity shall be made by City. C. Acknowledgment of sponsorship. Though the amount contributed by MDC would typically allow MDC to be acknowledged as a title sponsor of the 2025 Concerts on Broadway series, MDC's desire is to be acknowledged as a Tier I sponsor (or like designation). As such, MDC shall be entitled to recognition as `sponsored by," and have the MDC logo printed on all event marketing materials where sponsors' logos are printed. D. Invoice MDC. City sliall provide one (1) invoice to MDC by June 1, 2025, in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), and City shall use such amount for the payment of expenses related to the production of Concerts on Broadway. MENIOR.ANDU\I OF AGREFNIEN7 FOR N'IDC's CONCERTS ON BROADWAY CONTRIBUTION PAGE 1 OF 3 II. MDC's RESPONSIBILITIES. A. Reimbursement. Within thirty(30)days of receipt of City's invoice, MDC shall provide payment to City in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). B. Logo. MDC shall provide City with a copy of its logo, in digital format, f'or use on marketing materials as described herein. III.GENERAL TERMS. A. Term. This Agreement begins December 11.2024 and shall remain in effect through September 30,2025. B. Notice. Notice required to be provided by either of the parties under this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed by United States Mail, addressed as follows: City: City of Meridian MDC: Meridian Development Corporation Arts &Culture Coordinator Ashley Squyres, Administrator 33 E. Broadway Avenue 104 E. Fairview Avenue 4239 Meridian ID 83642 Meridian ID 83642 Either party may change its address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving formal notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. C. Entire agreement; modification. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements,understandings, negotiations, representations,and discussions, whether verbal or written, of the parties pertaining to that subject matter. The Agreement may not be changed,amended, or superseded unless by means of writing executed by both Parties hereto. D. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement in whole, or in part, due to convenience, nonappropriation, or when either or both parties agree that the continuation of this Agreement is not in the parties' best interest; by providing thirty (30) days written notice. If MDC is the terminating party, City shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for payments made for services properly performed by City to the date of termination. If City is the terminating party, MDC shall be entitled to reimbursement f'or a pro-rata share of MDC's contribution for any concerts that have not been presented at the time of tennination, i.e., $3,333.33 per concert. If the City decides to cancel all or a portion of the concerts due to concerns related to COVID-19 or other health risks. then MDC shall be entitled to reimbursement in the amount of$3,333.33 per concert cancelled. City's decision to cancel or reschedule a concert due to inclement weather or other unforeseen event on the day of such scheduled concert shall not constitute termination or breach.and MDC shall not be entitled to pro-rata or other reimbursement in such circumstance. E. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted bylaw and by Article VIII, section 4 of the Idaho Constitution, City agrees to indemnify,defend,and hold harmless MDC and its officers,agents, consultants,and employees from and against any and all liability, claims, NIE.IORANDUM of AGREEt ir:NT rOR MDC's CONCERTS ON BROADWAY CONTRIBUTION PAGE 2 or•3 losses. actions. or jud-nlents, costs and fees, inclLldill any costs and attorneys fees incurred therein. for damages. losses, or injury to entities; persons or property for any act. error, or OIllissioll al1sill`OLIt Of OI• ill any way connected With the activities and pro`ra111S described herein and/or the activities of City and its officers, employees, contractors, or agents related to or connected With this Agreement. F. Severability. Ifany part of this Agreement IS held to be invalid Or Unenforceable. SLICII holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder Of the Agreement IS reasonably Capable Of completion. The invalidity OI' Llllelllorceablllty Of all\, particular provision Of this Agreement Shall not affect the other provisions,and this Agreement shall be construed ill all respects as If all\' invalid of unenforceable provision Were omitted. G. Applicable Law. The Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho and jurisdiction for any disputes arising hereunder shall be in the Fourth Judicial District, Ada County, State of Idaho. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have e\eCLited this Agreement oil the Effective Date first% rittell above. MERIDIAN DEVELOPNIENT CORPORATION: Attest: ave Winder. Chairman teve Vl sek; Secretary CITY OF MERIDIAN: Attest: Robert E. Simison,Mayor 1/21/2025 Chris Johnson, City Clerk 1/21/2025 NtEMoit.wDUM OF AcItEEMI:NT relit\iDC's CONCIATS ON BitoAlmw CONTRIBUTION PAu:3 m., E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve and award contract to Dasco of Idaho for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$22,470,000.00 for the Can Ada Lift Station and Gravity Sewer Line project C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Sandra Ramirez, Procurement Div. Meeting Date: 1/21/2025 Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: 0.00 Topic: Approve and award contract to Dasco of Idaho for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $22,470,000.00 for the Can Ada Lift Station and Gravity Sewer Line project. Recommended Council Action: Approve and award construction contract to Dasco of Idaho for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $22,470,000 for the Can Ada Lift Station and Gravity Sewer Line project. As well as authorize Procurement Manager to issue the Purchase Order for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $22,470,000.00. Background: This is a multi-year contract; $16,000,000.00 will be funded in FY25 and the remaining $6,470,000.00 in FY26. CONTRACT CHECKLIST I. PROJECT INFORMATION Date: 1/9/2025 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works Project Name: Can Ada Lift Station&Gravity Line Project Manager: David Briggs Contract Amount: $22,470,000 Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Dasco of Idaho Is this a change order? Yes ❑ No ❑ Change Order No. II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) III. Contract Type Fund: 65 Budget Available(Purchasing attach report): Department 3590 Yes ❑� No ❑ Construction ❑ GL Account 96144 FY Budget: 2025&2026 Task Order ❑ Project Number: 10038.f Enhancement: Yes ❑ No ❑ Professional Service ❑ Equipment ❑ Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes❑ No ❑ Grant ❑ IV. PROCUREMENT USE ONLY-GRANT INFORMATION(to be completed only on Grant funded projects) Grant#: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status(Federal Funded) N/A Print and Attach the determination Print,attach and amend bid by addendum(if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach V. BASIS OF AWARD BID RFP/RFQ TASK ORDER Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected Master Agreement Category N/A (Bid Results Attached) Yes No ❑ (Ratings Attached) Yes ❑No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes 0 No ❑ If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Date Award Posted: 12/26/2024 7 day protest period ends: January 2,2025 VI. PROCUREMENT USE ONLY-CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION PW License 9770 Expiration Date: 6/30/2025 Corporation Status Active Insurance Certificates Received(Date): 1/8/2025 Expiration Date: 3/1/2025 Rating: Payment and Performance Bonds Received(Date): 1/8/2025 Rating: Builders Risk Ins.Req'd: Yes ❑J No ❑ If yes,has policy been purchased? (Only applicabale for projects above$1,000,000) VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) Reason Consultant Selected ❑ 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply ❑ Quality of work ❑ On Budget ❑On Time ❑ Accuracy of Construction Est ❑ 2 Qualified Personnel ❑ 3 Availability of personnel ❑ 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Enter supervisor Name Date Approve Vill. PROCUREMENT USE ONLY- AWARD INFORMATION Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: January 9,2025 Approval Date 1/21/2025 By: city Council Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final City Of Meridian Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Sandra 65 - Wastewater Fund 3590 - WW Construction Projects From 10/1/2024 Through 9/30/2025 Budget with Current Year Budget Amendments Actual Remaining Capital Outlay 96144 Lift Station construction 20,404,221.31 7,663.43 20,396,557.88 Total Capital Outlay 20,404,221.31 7,663.43 20,396,557.88 DEPT EXPENDITURES 20,404,221.31 7,663.43 20,396,557.88 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20,404,221.31 7,663.43 20,396,557.88 Date: 1/9/25 12:07:42 PM Page: 1 OPTION 1: OPEN CUT (BT-35CX) Legend The green cells with bolded numbers indicate that this bid was the lowest price. The orange cells indicate that this item from that vendor was selected. The green cells with orange outline indicate that this item from that vendor was self has the lowest price. $ 123 acted, and BID NAI BID NUI BID DUI #1-1 #1-2 #1-3 #1-4 #2-1 #2-2 #2-3 #3-1 #3-2 #3-3 #3-4 #3-5 #3-6 #3-7 #3-8 #3-9 #3-10 #3-11 #3-12 #3-13 #3-14 #3-15 #3-16 #3-17 #3-18 #3-19 #3-20 #3-21 #3-22 #3-23 #3-24 #3-25 #3-26 #3-27 #3-28 #3-29 ((El IDIAN:--- ME: Can Ada Lift Station & Gravity Sewer Line MBER: PW-2505-10038.f E DATE: December 17, 2024 2:30PM BID RESULTS Items GENERAL (4) 0122 20 1.2 A 1- Mobilization, Bonds, Insurance and Demobilization 0122 20 1.2 A 2- Erosion and Sediment Control 0122 20 1.2 A 3 -Traffic Control 0122 20 1.2 A 4- Potholing 0122 20 1.2 B 1 -Can Ada Lift Station 0122 20 1.2 B 2 -Shoring 0122 20 1.2 B 3- Dewatering- Llft Station GRAVITY & FORCEMAIN PIPELINESO. 0122 20 1.2 C 1 -Gravel Surface Restoration 0122 20 1.2 C 2 - Native/Sod/Landscape Surface Restoration 0122 20 1.2 C 3 -60" Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 0122 20 1.2 C 4-48" Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 0122 20 1.2 C 5 -60" Vortex Sanitary Sewer Manhole 0122 20 1.2 C 6 a - 15" Gravity Sewer-Open Cut 0122 20 1.2 C 7 a -18" Gravity Sewer- Open Cut 0122 20 1.2 C 9-Trenchless Installation 36" Steel Casing(Gravity) - Five Mile Creek-STA 1+80 0122 20 1.2 C 9-Trenchless Installation 36" Steel Casing(Gravity) -William's Pipeline-STA 30+00 0122 20 1.2 C 9-Trenchless Installation 36" Steel Casing(Gravity) - Phyllis Canal -STA 46+20 0122 20 1.2 C 10- 14" HDPE DR17 Pipe -Open Trench 0122 20 1.2 C 11 - 10" HDPE DR17 Pipe -Open Trench 0122 20 1.2 C 12 -Thrust Wall 0122 20 1.2 C 13 - Dual Air/Vac Valve - Five Mile Creek 0122 20 1.2 C 13- Dual Air/Vac Valve-William's Pipeline 0122 20 1.2 C 13 - Dual Air/Vac Valve - Phyllis Canal 0122 20 1.2 C 13 - Dual Air/Vac Valve - McMillan/McDermott 0122 20 1.2 C 14- 14" Plug Valve 0122 20 1.2 C 15 - 10" Plug Valve 0122 20 1.2 C 9-Trenchless Installation 36" Steel Casing(Pressure) - Five Mile Creek-STA 1+80 0122 20 1.2 C 9-Trenchless Installation 36" Steel Casing(Pressure) -William's Pipeline-STA 30+00 0122 20 1.2 C 9-Trenchless Installation 36" Steel Casing(Pressure) - Phyllis Canal -STA 46+20 0122 20 1.2 C 16-Shoring 0122 20 1.2 C 17 - Dewatering-Gravity 0122 20 1.2 C 18- Dewatering- Forcemain 0122 20 1.2 C 19 -Trench/Soft Spot Stabilization (USED ONLY WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM OWNER) 0122 20 1.2 C 20 a -Asphalt Surface Restoration - McMillan Rd -Can Ada to Star Road - Full Road Pavement Rest( 0122 20 1.2 C 21 -Asphalt Surface Restoration - McMillan Rd -Star Road to McDermont-Single Lane Pavement F 0122 20 1.2 C 22 -Asphalt Surface Restoration - McDermont Rd -Single Lane Pavement Restoration Dasco of Idaho Total Cost $ 22,470,000.0 Selected# 36 Selected ($) $ 22,470,000.0 Selected Lowest Quantity Unit UnitPrice TotalCost $ 1,000,000.0 $ 1,000,000.0 1 LS $ 1,000,000.0 $ 1,000,000.0 $ 135,000.0 $ 79,200.0 1 LS $ 135,000.0 $ 135,000.0 $45,000.0 $45,000.0 1 LS $45,000.0 $45,000.0 $ 22,000.0 $ 13,400.0 1 LS $ 22,000.0 $ 22,000.0 1 r _ $ 3,745,784.0 $ 2,850,000.0 1 LS $ 3,745,784.0 $ 3,745,784.0 $ 7,200.0 $ 7,200.0 1 LS $ 7,200.0 $ 7,200.0 $ 200,000.0 $ 200,000.0 1 LS $200,000.0 $ 200,000.0 $ 14,000.0 $ 6,600.0 100 SY $ 140 $ 14,000.0 $ 10,000.0 $ 10,000.0 500 SY $ 20 $ 10,000.0 $ 576,000.0 $ 360,000.0 18 EA $32,000.0 $ 576,000.0 $8,874.0 $ 8,874.0 1 EA $8,874.0 1$8,874.0 $ 125,000.0 $44,500.0 1 EA $ 125,000.0 $ 125,000.0 $ 682,500.0 $ 682,500.0 1500 LF $455 $682,500.0 $ 1,794,500.0 $ 1,794,500.0 3700 LF $485 $ 1,794,500.0 $910,000.0 $ 723,800.0 140 LF $6,500.0 $910,000.0 $ 600,000.0 $ 521,600.0 80 LF $7,500.0 $ 600,000.0 $935,000.0 $ 833,000.0 170 LF $5,500.0 $ 935,000.0 $ 1,232,000.0 $ 1,232,000.0 11200 LF $ 110 Es' 232,000.$972,000.0 $ 972,000.0 10800 LF $90 2,000.0 $ 52,000.0 $ 3,508.0 4 EA $ 13,000.0 $ 52,000.0 $43,000.0 $ 12,600.0 1 EA $43,000.0 $43,000.0 $43,000.0 $ 12,600.0 1 EA $43,000.0 $43,000.0 $43,000.0 $ 12,600.0 1 EA $43,000.0 $43,000.0 $43,000.0 $ 13,600.0 1 EA $43,000.0 $43,000.0 $ 23,200.0 $ 23,200.0 4 EA $5,800.0 $ 23,200.0 $ 3,150.0 $ 3,150.0 1 EA $3,150.0 $ 3,150.0 $ 786,250.0 $ 786,250.0 170 LF $4,625.0 1$ 786,250.0 $ 584,800.0 $ 520,800.0 80 LF $7,310.0 $ 584,800.0 $ 722,500.0 $ 722,500.0 170 LF $4,250.0 $722,500.0 $ 245,000.0 $ 245,000.0 1 LS $ 245,000.0 $ 245,000.0 $ 2,712,042.0 $ 2,150,000.0 1 LS $ 2,712,042.0 $ 2,712,042.0 $ 65,000.0 $ 65,000.0 1 LS $ 65,000.0 1$65,000.0 $ 140,000.0 $ 111,000.0 2000 CY $ 70 $ 140,000.0 $ 2,880,000.0 $ 1,168,000.0 16000 SY 1$ 180 $ 2,880,000.0 $ 842,400.0 $ 639,600.0 7800 SY $ 108 $ 842,400.0 $ 226,800.0 $ 174,300.0 2100 SY $ 108 $ 226,800.0 Sunroc Corporation $ 25,313,486.0 0 $ 0 UnitPrice TotalCost ==MM $ 2,755,034.0 $ 2,755,034.0 $ 79,200.0 $79,200.0 $ 295,000.0 $ 295,000.0 $ 13,400.0 $ 13,400.0 $ 2,850,000.0 $ 2,850,000.0 $46,100.0 $46,100.0 $304,824.0 $ 304,824.0 $ 66 $6,600.0 $99 $49,500.0 $ 20,000.0 $360,000.0 $ 15,200.0 $ 15,200.0 $44,500.0 $44,500.0 $ 1,070.0 $ 1,605,000.0 $ 1,070.0 $ 3,959,000.0 $ 5,170.0 $ 723,800.0 $ 6,520.0 $ 521,600.0 $4,900.0 $833,000.0 $ 123 $ 1,377,600.0 $ 106 $ 1,144,800.0 $877 $ 3,508.0 $ 12,600.0 $ 12,600.0 $ 12,600.0 $ 12,600.0 $ 12,600.0 $ 12,600.0 $ 13,600.0 $ 13,600.0 $8,170.0 $ 32,680.0 $ 5,440.0 $ 5,440.0 $4,890.0 $ 831,300.0 $ 6,510.0 $520,800.0 $4,890.0 $ 831,300.0 $ 1,650,000.0 $ 1,650,000.0 $ 2,150,000.0 $ 2,150,000.0 $ 160,000.0 $ 160,000.0 $ 55.5 $ 111,000.0 $ 73 $ 1,168,000.0 $ 82 $ 639,600.0 $ 83 $ 174,300.0 CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CAN ADA LIFT STATION & GRAVITY SEWER LINE PROJECT # 10038.f THIS CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION is made this_ of January 2025, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian,a municipalcorporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "City", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, Dasco of Idaho hereinafter referred to as "Contractor", whose business address is 411 E Karcher Rd. Nampa, ID 83687 and whose Public Works Contractor License # is 009770. INTRODUCTION Whereas, the City has a need for services involving Sewer Lift Station; and WHEREAS, the Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform and has agreed to provide such services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Scope of Work: 1.1 Contractor shall perform and furnish to the City upon execution of this Contract and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all services and work, and comply in all respects, as specified in the document titled "Scope of Work" a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, together with any amendments that may be agreed to in writing by the parties. 1.2 All documents, drawings and written work product prepared or produced by the Contractor under this Agreement, including without limitation electronic data files, are the property of the Contractor; provided, however, the City shall have the right to reproduce, publish and use all such work, or any part thereof, in any manner and for any purposes whatsoever and to authorize others to do so. If any such work is copyrightable, the Contractor may copyright the same, except that, as to any work which is copyrighted by the Contractor, the City reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use such work, or any part thereof, and to authorize others to do so. 1.3 The Contractor shall provide services and work under this Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal, state and City laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions. The Contractor Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 1 of 15 Project#10038.f represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this Agreement. Except for that representation and any representations made or contained in any proposal submitted by the Contractor and any reports or opinions prepared or issued as part of the work performed by the Contractor under this Agreement,Contractor makes no other warranties, either express or implied, as part of this Agreement. 1.4 Services and work provided by the Contractor at the City's request under this Agreement will be performed in a timely manner in accordance with a Schedule of Work, which the parties hereto shall agree to. The Schedule of Work may be revised from time to time upon mutual written consent of the parties. 2. Consideration 2.1 The Contractor shall be compensated on a Not-to-Exceed basis as provided in Exhibit B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$22,470,000.00. The contract will cross two fiscal budget years (FY25 and FY26); FY25 shall not exceed $16,000,000.00. FY26 shall not exceed $6,470,000.00. Each fiscal year begins October 1st through September 30tn 2.2 The Contractor shall provide the City with a monthly statement and supporting invoices, as the work warrants, of fees earned and costs incurred for services provided during the billing period, which the City will pay within 30 days of receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City. The City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by City to Contractor under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of Contractor. 2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor shall not be entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportation,drawings, renderings or mockups or material escalations. Specifically, Contractor shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever. 3. Term: 3.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon work, (b) or unless sooner terminated as provided in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Section 4 below or unless some other method or time of termination is listed in Exhibit A. Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 2 of 15 Project#10038.f 3.2 Should Contractor default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Contractor. 3.3 Should City fail to timely remit payment to Contractor as provided in Section 28, Contractor, at the Contractor's option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due. 4. Liquidated Damages: Substantial Completion shall be accomplished within 608 (six hundred eight) calendar days from Notice to Proceed. This project shall be considered Substantially Complete when the Owner has full and unrestricted use and benefit of the facilities, both from an operational and safety standpoint, and only minor incidental work, corrections or repairs remain for the physical completion of the total contract. Contractor shall be liable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed to be liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because of such delay and not be construed as a penalty. Upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed, the Contractor shall have 669 (six hundred sixty-nine) calendar days to complete the work as described herein. Contractor shall beliable to the City for any delay beyond this time period in the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day. Such payment shall be construed tobe liquidated damages by the Contractor in lieu of any claim or damage because ofsuch delay and not be construed as a penalty. See Milestones listed in the Payment Schedule for Substantial Completion. 5. Termination: 5.1 If, through any cause, Contractor, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if City determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of City, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate thisAgreement by giving written notice to Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the effectivedate of such termination. Contractor may terminate this agreement at any time by giving at least sixty (60) days' notice to City. In the event of any termination of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished documents, data, and reports prepared by Contractor under this Agreement shall, at the option of the City, become its property, and Contractor shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily complete hereunder. Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 3 of 15 Project#10038.f 5.2 Notwithstanding the above, Contractor shall not be relieved of liability tothe City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by Contractor, and the City may withhold any payments to Contractor for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount ofdamages due the City from Contractor is determined. This provision shallsurvive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve Contractor of its liability to the City for damages. 6. Independent Contractor: 6.1 In all matters pertaining to this agreement, Contractor shall be acting as an independent Contractor, and neither Contractor nor any officer, employeeor agent of Contractor will be deemed an employee of City. Except as expressly provided in Exhibit A, Contractor has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation ofthe personnel of the City in the performance of this agreement shall be made bythe City. 6.2 Contractor, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent Contractors and not as employees of the City. 6.3 Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of Contractor in fulfillment of this Agreement. If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Contractor, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Contractor. 7. SubContractors: Contractor shall require that all of its sub-Contractors be licensed per State of Idaho Statute # 54-1901 & 54-1902. 8. Removal of Unsatisfactory Employees: The Contractor shall only furnish employees who are competent and skilled for work under this contract. If, in the opinion of the City, an employee of the Contractor is incompetent or disorderly, refuses to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract, threatens or uses abusive language while on City property, or is otherwise unsatisfactory, that employee shall be removed from all work under this contract. Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 4 of 15 Project#10038.f 9. Indemnification and Insurance: 9.1 Contractor shall indemnify and save and hold harmless City and it's selected officials, officers,employees, agents, and volunteers from and for any and all losses, claims, actions,judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor, its servants, agents, officers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortious conduct of City or its employees. Contractor shall maintain, and specificallyagrees that it will maintain, throughout the term of this Agreement, liabilityinsurance, in which the City shall be named an additional insured in the minimum amounts as follow: General Liability One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incidentor occurrence, Automobile Liability Insurance One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation Insurance, in the statutory limits as required by law. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitationof the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City; and if City becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided, Contractor covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmlessCity from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Contractor or Contractor's officers, employs, agents, representatives or subcontractors and resulting in or attributable topersonal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property,including use of. Contractor shall provide City with a Certificate of Insurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing Contractor's compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date Contractor begins performance of its obligations under this Agreement. In the event the insurance minimums are changed, Contractor shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to Meridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 9.2 Insurance is to be placed with an Idaho admitted insurer with a Best's rating of no less than A-. 9.3 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions or named insureds; or the Contractor shall provide a bond, cash or letter of credit guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 9.4 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, Contractor's Insurance coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City or the City's elected officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 5 of 15 Project#10038.f the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with Contractor's insurance except as to the extent of City's negligence. 9.5 The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 9.6 All insurance coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein. 9.7 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 10. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. 11. Bonds: Payment and Performance Bonds are required on all Public Works Improvement Projects per the ISPWC and the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC, which by this reference are made a part hereof. Contractor is required to furnish faithful performance and payment bonds in the amount of 100% of the contract price issued by surety licensed to do business in the State of Idaho with a Best's rating of no less than A-. In the event that the contract is subsequently terminated for failure to perform, the Contractor and/or surety will be liable and assessed for any and all costs for the re-procurement of the contract services. 12. Warranty: All construction and equipment provided under this agreement shall be warranted for 2 years from the date of the City of Meridian acceptance per the ISPWC and the Meridian Supplemental Specifications & Drawings to the ISPWC and any modifications, which by this reference are made a part hereof. All items found to be defective during a warranty inspection and subsequently corrected will require an additional two (2) year warranty from the date of City's acceptance of the corrected work. 13. Changes: The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Work to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of Contractor's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and Can Ada Lift Sation 8,Gravity Sewer Line page 6 of 15 Project#10038.f between the City and Contractor, shall be incorporated in written amendments which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement. 14. Taxes: The City of Meridian is exempt from Federal and State taxes and will execute the required exemption certificates for items purchased and used by the City. Items purchased by the City and used by a Contractor are subject to Use Tax. All other taxes are the responsibility of the Contractor and are to be included in the Contractor's Bid pricing. 15. Meridian Stormwater Specifications: All construction projects require either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or an erosion sediment control plan (ESCP) as specified in the City of Meridian Construction Stormwater Management Program (CSWMP) manual. The CSWMP manual containing the procedures and guidelines can be found at this address: http://www.meridianCity.org/environmental.aspx?id=13618. Contractor shall retain all stormwater and erosion control documentation generated on site during construction including the SWPPP manual, field inspections and amendments. Prior to final acceptance of the job by the City the Contractor shall return the field SWPPP manual and field inspection documents to the City for review. A completed Contractor Request to File Project N.O.T. with the EPA form shall be provided to the City with the documents. These documents shall be retained, reviewed and approved by the City prior to final acceptance of the project. 16. ACHD: Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with the City to obtain appropriate ACHD permit(s) and will reimburse the City for fees, fines, or penalties City incurs due to Contractor's violation of any ACHD policy. City shall certify to ACHD that Contractor is authorized to obtain a Temporary Highway and Right-of-Way Use Permit from ACHD on City's behalf. The parties acknowledge and agree that the scope of the agency granted by such certification is limited to, and conterminous with, the term and scope of this Agreement. 17. Reports and Information: 17.1 At such times and in such forms as the City may require, there shall be furnished to the City such statements, records, reports, data and information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. 17.2 Contractor shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostatic, photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 7 of 15 Project#10038.f representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof. 18. Audits and Inspections: At any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City for examination all of Contractor's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. Contractor shall permit the City to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel,conditions of employment and other datarelating to all matters covered by this Agreement. 19. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 20. Equal Employment Opportunity: In performing the work herein, Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act, Revenue Sharing Act Title 31, U.S. Code Section 2176. Specifically, the Contractor agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion,sex, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. Contractor will take affirmative action during employment or training to ensure that employees are treated without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, political affiliation, marital status, or handicap. In performing the Work required herein, Contractor shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state orlocal law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion,sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 21. Employment of Bona Fide Idaho Residents: Contractor must comply with Idaho State Statute 44-1002 which states that the Contractor employ ninety-five percent (95%) bona fide Idaho residents as employees on any job under any such contract except where under such contracts fifty (50) or less persons are employed, the Contractor may employ ten percent (10%) nonresidents, provided, however, in all cases employers must give preference to the employment of bona fide residents in the performance of said work. 22. Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. It has received independent legal advice from its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 8 of 15 Project#10038.f advice. 23. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 24. Construction and Severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. 25. Waiver of Default: Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided above. 26. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written,whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. 27. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that Contractor shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights underthis Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of City. 28. Payment Request: Payment requests shall be submitted to City of Meridian through the City's project management software. The Project Manager will compare the invoice against the Payment Schedule in the Agreement for compliance. Upon approval that the work has been done and is in compliance with the Agreement, the Project Manager will approve the pay request for processing. City of Meridian payment terms are Net 30 from the date City receives a correct invoice. Final payment will not be released until the City has received a tax release from the Tax Commission. Retainage of Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 9 of 15 Project 410038.f five percent (5%) of the current contract value will be withheld from the final pay application(s) until final completion has been met and releases from both the Idaho Tax Commission and Surety have been received by the City. 29. Cleanup: Contractor shall keep the worksite clean and free from debris. At completion of work and prior to requesting final inspection, the Contractor shall remove all traces of waste materials and debris resulting from the work. Final payment will not be made if cleanup has not been performed. 30. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation to Bid document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document. 31. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of work required hereunder, Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. Certifications. Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-2359 and 67-2346, Contractor hereby certifies: A. That Contractor is not currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not, for the duration of this Contract, be owned or operated by the government of China. B. That Contractor is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of the Contract engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. 32. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: Q; Contractor: City of Meridian Dasco of Idaho Procurement Manager Attn: Ryan Brunner 33 E Broadway Ave. 411 E Karcher Rd. Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 10 of 15 Project#10038.f Meridian, ID 83642 Nampa, ID 83687 208-489-0417 Phone: 907-406-5619 Email: Ryan.Brunner@dascoidaho.com Idaho Public Works License #: 009770 Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 33. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN: DASCO OF IDAHO: BY: -- BY: KEITH WATTS, Procurement Manger Ben Hichcock, President DATED: DATED: Approved by Council Date: (if needed) 1/21/2025 Project Manager David Briggs Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 11 of 15 Project#10038.f EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK REFER TO INVITATION TO BID PW-2505-10038.f ALL ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the Invitation to Bid Package # PW-2505-10038.f are by this reference made a part hereof. SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK All construction work shall be done in accordance with the current version of the Idaho Standards for Public Works Construction (ISPWC), the current version of the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications to the ISPWC (and any Addendums). See separate attached documents: • Technical Specifications dated September 2024 by City of Meridian (870 pages) • Can Ada Lift Station & Gravity Line Drawings dated September 2024 by Consor (125 pages) Can Ada Lift Sation$Gravity Sewer Line page 12 of 15 Project#10038.f EXHIBIT B MILESTONE / PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $22,470,000.00. MILESTONE DATES/SCHEDULE Milestone 1 Substantial Completion 608 Days from Notice to Proceed Milestone 2 �Final Completion 669 Days from Notice to Proceed PRICING SCHEDULE Contract includes furnishing all labor, materials, equipment and incidentals as required for the PROJECT NAME Project per ITB BID #PW-2505-10038.f. NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT.............................................$22,470,000.00 Contract is a not to exceed amount. Line-item pricing below will be used for invoice verification and any additional increases or decreases in work requested by City.The City will pay the Contractor based on actual quantities of each item of work in accordance with the contract documents. Contract Pricing Schedule Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit I Price OPTION 1 — OPEN CUT GENERAL 10122 20 1.2 A 1 Mobilization, Bonds, Insurance and Demobilization 1 LS $ 1,000,000. 0122 20 1.2 A 2 Erosion and Sediment Control 1 LS $ 135,000.d 0122 20 1.2 A 3 Traffic Control 1 LS $4S,000.d P1 22 20 1.2 A 4 lPotholing 1 1 LS 1 $ 22,000. CAN ADA LIFT STATION '01 22 20 1.2 B 1 (Can Ada Lift Station 1 LS $ 3,745,784.0 I01 22 20 1.2 B 2 (Shoring 1 LS $7,200.0 '01 22 20 1.2 B 3 IDewatering- Lift Station 1 LS $ 200,000.0 1 GRAVITY & FORCEMAIN PIPELINES - OPEN CUT I p1 22 20 1.2 C 1 ravel Surface Restoration 100 SY $ 146 10122 20 1.2 C 2 Native/Sod/Landscape Surface (Restoration 500 SY $2J Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 13 of 15 Project#10038.f 0122 20 1.2 C 3 160"Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 18 EA $32,000.10 0122 20 1.2 C 4 k8"Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 1 EA $8,874. 122 20 1.2 C 5 60" Vortex Sanitary Sewer Manhole 1 EA $125,000. 0122 20 1.2 C 6 a 15" Gravity Sewer-Open Cut 1500 LF $45 P1 22 20 1.2 C 7 a118" Gravity Sewer-Open Cut 1 3700 LF $485 122 20 1.2 C 9 lTrenchless Installation 36"Steel (Casing (Gravity) -Five Mile Creek STA 1+80 140 LF $6,500. 122 20 1.2 C 9 rrenchless Installation 36"Steel Casing(Gravity) -William's Pipeline-STA 30+00 80 LF $7,500. 0122 20 1.2 C 9 Trenchless Installation 36"Steel Casing(Gravity) -Phyllis Canal- TA 46+20 170 LF $5,500. 1 22 20 1.2 C 10 14" HDPE DR17 Pipe-Open Trench 11200 LF $ 11 1 22 20 1.2 C 11 10" HDPE DR17 Pipe-Open French 10800 LF $9 10122 20 1.2 C 12�hrust Wall 4 EA $13,000. 0122 20 1.2 C 13 IDual Air/Vac Valve-Five Mile Creek 1 EA $43,000.01 b1 22 20 1.2 C 13 Dual Air/Vac Valve-William's Pipeline 1 EA $43,000. P122 20 1.2 C 13 Dual Air/Vac Valve- Phyllis Canal 1 EA $43,000. r122 20 1.2 C 13 Dual Air/Vac Valve- McMillan/McDermott I EA 1 $43,000. P1 22 20 1.2 C 14 14" Plug Valve 4 EA $5,800. �)1 22 201.2 C 15 10" Plug Valve 1 EA $3,150. 0122 20 1.2 C 9 f Trenchless Installation 36"Steel Casing (Pressure)- Five Mile reek-STA 1+80 170 LF $4,625. b1 22 20 1.2 C 9 �Trenchless Installation 36"Steel (Casing (Pressure) -William's Pipeline-STA 30+00 80 LF $7,310. 122 20 1.2 C 9 rrenchless Installation 36"Steel !Casing(Pressure)-Phyllis Canal- ISTA 46+20 170 LF $4,250. 10122 20 1.2 C 16 horing 1 LS $245,000. b1 22 20 1.2 C 17 IDewatering-Gravity 1 LS $2,712,042. 1 22 20 1.2 C 18 Dewatering-Forcemain 1 LS $65,000. 0122 20 1.2 C 19Trench/Soft Spot Stabilization (USED ONLY WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM OWNER) 2000 CY $7 +a 122 201.2 C 20 lAsphalt Surface Restoration- $ 18 1McMillan Rd-Can Ada to Star 16000 SY Can Ada Lift Sation&Gravity Sewer Line page 14 of 15 Project#10038.f Road - Full Road Pavement Restoration 0122 20 1.2 C 21 AsphaltSurface Restoration - McMillan Rd -Star Road to McDermont-Single Lane Pavement Restoration 7800 SY $ 10 122 20 1.2 C 22 Asphalt Surface Restoration - McDermont Rd -Single Lane Pavement Restoration 2100 SY $10 E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. I CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: January 21, 2025 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course Addition C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Regular Meeting Agenda From: Mike Barton, Parks &Recreation Meeting Date: January 21, 2025 Topic: Ninja Warrior Course in Discovery Park- Presentation and Budget Amendment Background: We have been working with the Plimmer family to add a Nija Warrior course to Discovery Park. The Plimmer family and their daughter Eva,who has a life-threatening disease, loves Ninja Warriors and would like to add this amenity to a park for people to enjoy.Adding this amenity fits the theme of Discovery Park where there's amenities for all ages and abilities. This is an amenity for all ages but is particularly appealing for ages 13 plus,which is typically an underserved group of park users. Shawn and Jodi Plimmer and Abbey Louie have raised over $185,000 towards the cost of this amenity.Additionally,we would add to that a $20,000 Blue Cross grant that was received by the City. To complete the funding needed of$350,000 we are asking for a $145,000 of fund balance dollars to cover the balance. We are asking for Council approval to place this amenity in Discovery Park and to approve a budget amendment of$350,000. Between the funds raised and the Blue Cros Grant, $205,000.00 of that amount will be reimbursed. Requested Council Action: Approve adding this amenity Discovery Park and approve a budget amendment of$350,000. Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course Mike Barton Parks Superintendent Purpose - Evangeline Brighten Plimmer is a brave, kind-hearted, and faith-filled 11-year-old girl who—despite facing an unimaginably difficult journey after being diagnosed with a tumor in her brainstem. Eva's wish was to do something for more than just herself—she wanted to build a playground in her hometown for children to enjoy for many years to come. But not just any playground... Eva is a HUGE ninja warrior fan, so her wish was to build a playground unlike any other in the area— Opportunit — one with ninja-like obstacles. Add an amenity to Discovery that enhances the overall theme of something for every age group Funding - AL� Total Budget $350,000 .c too W $191 ,000 Donations and Fundraisi In KinDonations d 7 $ City Funding r 1 � f F KG ' ACTIVE �I�xl 1� TEEN +01 Y ..Yrn• I — •y i• - ,. .i. w•� 4CO .LJ } = - ACTIVE AREA WORK. 1' • a DISCOVERY PARK PHASE 2 Fl '40 YD OASH- iJ _� C ' NORTH "Nor 1-mv Iwo •. - PICKLEBALL PICKLE SHEI-TER tENNI LESALL. - BOAC€g44 t •T.YP QF 2' . li •� 1 - 7 _ -_ 1 f BASKETBALL COURT .p COMMUNITY GARDEN • � � •rJ 1 • III * 1 1 FIRE V17NE TRASH !• ENCLOSURE i' 4_ 3r5ae •�� ��N �� ra: •+ 4." ''+l: - f A- sY ~ s'�• !« a r F:1+� yv. Aglow . �► � r '•r y 1 D. VX !._ L .12 Moil sv) 1 A i I r r� .. - ,•�st� � ,, it t., �" tj �, •� f.. • �. •� ram. �i o"I'li bk IL 4 I Did sv Lm 1p 'r r w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of$145,000 for Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course 1/16/2025 11:35AM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Personnel Costs Full Time Equivalent(FTE): Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total E IDIAN--_ 01 5290 41200 0 Wages 01 5290 41206 0 PT/Seasonal Wages 01 5290 41210 0 Overtime Please only complete the fields 01 5290 41304 0 Uniform Allowance highlighted in Orange. 01 5290 42021 0 FICA $ T Amendment Details 01 5290 42022 0 PERSI $ Title: Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course 01 5290 42023 0 Worker's Comp $ Department Name: Parks and Recreation 01 5290 42025 0 Employee Insurance $ Presenting Department Name: Parks and Recreation Total Personnel Costs $ Department#: 5290 Operating Expenditures Primary Funding Source: 1 Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description One-Time On-Going Total CIP#: 01 5290 0 $ Project#: 01 5290 0 $ 01 5290 0 $ Is this for an Emergency? ❑ Yes ❑ No 01 5290 0 $ New Level of Service? ❑ Yes ❑ No 01 5290 0 $ 01 S290 0 $ Clerks Office Stamp 01 5290 0 $ 01 5290 0 $ 01 5290 0 $ 01 5290 0 $ 01 5290 0 $ 01 5290 0 $ 01 5290 0 $ Date of Council Approval 1/21/2025 Total Operating Expenditures $ $ $ Capital Outlay Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Acknowledgement Date 01 5290 96827 0 Ninja Warrior Course $ 350,000 01 5290 0 �-u� 1/16/2025 01 5290 0 Department Director 01 5290 0 REVIEWED Ol 5290 0 By Todd Lavoie at 11:50 am,Jan 16,2025 01 5290 0 Chilq FinaTieialOffi r Total Capital Outlay $ 350,000 Revenue/Donations 5/ Fund# Dept.# G/L# Proj.# G/L#Description Total Co ci n / 01 5290 33120 1 0 Reimbursement Revenue $ 185,000 Cy 1-16-25 01 5290 33100 0 Blue Cross Grant $ 20,000 01 5290 0 Mayor Total Revenue/Donations $ 205,000 Total Amendment Request $ 145,000 City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form H:\Budget Amendment-Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course 1/1612025 11:35AM City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form Total Amendment Cost-Lifetime Prior Year(s) Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Department Name:_ Parks and Recreation _ Funding 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Title: Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course Personnel S $ $ $ $ Instructions for Submitting Budget Amendments: Operating S S $ S $ >Department will send Amendment with Directors signature to Finance(Budget Manager)for review Capital $ 350,000 >Finance call send Amendment to Council Liaison for signature Tota 1 $ $ 350,000 S $ $ $ _>council Liaison will send signed Amendment to Mayor Total Estimated Project Cost: $ 350,000 >Mayor will send signed Amendment to Finance(Budget Manager) Evaluation Questions >Finance(Budget Manager)will send approved copy of Amendment to Department Please answer all Evaluation Questions using the financial data referenced above. >Department will add copy of Amendment to council Agenda using Munlcode Agenda Manager 1. Describe what is being requested? We have been working with the Plimmer family to add a Ninja Warrior course to Discovery Park.The Plimmer family and their daughter, Eva,who has a life threatening diesease,loves Ninja Warriors and would like to add this ammenity to a park for people to enjoy.Adding this amenity fits the theme of Discovery Park where there are amenities for all ages and abilities. 2. Why was this budget request not submitted during the current fiscal year budget cycle? The idea and subsequent fundraising occured after the budget process. 3. What is the ex lanation for not submitting this budget request during the next fiscal year budget c cle? The family would like to see this vision thru as soon as possible. 4.Describe the proposed method of funding? If funding is split between Funds(i.e. General,Enterprise,Grant),please include the percentage split. List the amounts and sources of anticipated additional revenue that will result from approval of this request. The$145,000 net cost is being requested from the fund balance. 5.Does this request align with the Department/City's strategic plan? If not,please explain how this request was not included in the Department/City strategic plan? Yes 6. Does this request require resources to be provided by other departments? If yes,please describe the necessary resources to be provided by other departments. No 7.Does this Amendment include any needed Equipment or Software that will utilize the Cit 's network? Yes or No No 8.Is the amendment going to result in the disposal of an asset? Yes or No No 9.An additional comments? Total Amendment Request $ 145,000 Every effort should be made to avoid reopening the budget for an amendment. Departments will need to provide back up and app ear before the City Council to justify budget amendments. Budget amendments are intended for emergency or mandatory changes to the original balanced budget. Changes to the original balanced budget may cause a funding shortfall. City of Meridian FY2025 Budget Amendment Form H:\Budget Amendment-Discovery Park Ninja Warrior Course W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Amendment in the amount of$2,500,000 for purchase of Ladder Truck C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline Changes to Agenda: th  Item #22: Lennon Pointe (H-2024-0060) – The Applicant requests continuance to Feb. 4 due to the site not being posted correctly within the required timeframe prior to the hearing. Item #19: Stonehill Crossing Subdivision (FP-2024-0020) Application(s):  Final Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 16.06-acres of land, zoned R-4 & R-8, located on the south side of W. Amity Rd., midway between S. Meridian Rd. & S. Linder Rd. History: The preliminary plat for this property was approved in 2023. Summary of Request: A final plat consisting of two (2) building lots on 16.06-acres of land in the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts. This is the first phase of Stonehill Crossing Subdivision. Staff Recommendation: The preliminary plat included a condition (i.e. #2.1g) for a local public street to be provided off S. Oak Briar Way between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 for access to these lots instead of a direct access to the collector street. The street was required to extend at a minimum, to the east boundary of Lot 2, Block 1 and then extend to the south with future re-subdivision of Lot 3, Block 1. Based on the City’s requirement, ACHD also included conditions (i.e. #10 & #11) that required a local street to be constructed between these two lots and extend to the site’s east property line. Since that time, ACHD has determined they will not allow a local street in this location. After much discussion with ACHD on this matter, Council approval of a change to the access in this location is requested to allow a private driveway access via S. Oak Briar Way on Lot 1, Block 1 with a temporary ingress-egress easement to Lot 2, Block 1. When an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of Lot 3, Block 1, the access easement should terminate, and access should be provided internally via a local public street. Other than that, the proposed final plat is in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat, as required. Written Testimony: None Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number FP-2024-0020, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of January 21, 2025: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number FP-2024-0020, as presented during the hearing on January 21, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number FP-2024-0020 to the hearing date of January 21, 2025 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #20: 330 N. Linder Road (H-2024-0048) Application(s):  Annexation Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 1.0 acres of land, zoned R1 in Ada County, located at 330 N. Linder Road. History: N/A Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: General Industrial Summary of Request: The applicant is requesting annexation of 1.0 acre of land for the proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service. The subject property is part of an enclave area surrounded by City annexed property. Annexation of this land will provide more efficient provision of City services. Industrial uses exist to the west across N. Linder Rd and to the south and east; single-family residences exist to the north in Ada County. This property is designated as General Industrial on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The use of vehicle sales or rental and service is consistent with the comprehensive plan for the general industrial designation. The existing residence is proposed to remain as the main office for the vehicle sales business. The building shall abandon well and sceptic and connect to city services at the time of annexation in accord with UDC. Additionally, the current structure proposed to remain will be non-conforming within the 35-foot street setback required if approved. Any future development will require compliance with this standard. The applicant is requesting a council waiver to reduce the 25-foot landscape buffer to 5 feet adjacent to the residential properties to the north. The property owners to the north have provided a letter in support of the reduction. The applicant is proposing waterwise landscaping which allows for a 50% reduction in street landscape buffers. A 12.5-foot wide street buffer is required to be constructed along N. Linder Rd. One (1) full driveway access exists to this site via Linder Rd. that is proposed to be eliminated, and the applicant will share access with the property to the south through a cross-access agreement. Commission Recommendation: Approval Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Nick Rinker and Matt Wilke ii. In opposition: N/A iii. Commenting: Matt Wilke iv. Written testimony: N/A v. Key Issue(s): Cross access to the property to the north, creating a non-conforming structure with the approval of this application, and the number of vehicles being displayed. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: i. Cross access to the property to the north, creating a non-conforming structure with the approval of this application, and the number of vehicles being displayed. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: i. None Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: i. After some discussions with the applicant, staff is recommending some changes to our DA provisions for your consideration. - ITD required 5 vehicle display areas for retail car sales so staff is changing the number of vehicles from 3 to 5. B. No more than (5) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building except where the existing garage is located. - The applicant is not in favor of cross-access being required to the property to the north. However, staff will require an easement instead of a stub at this time and will require cross-access when this property redevelops as anything other than a Vehicle sales or rental and service use. We understand the applicant’s concerns regarding security of the car lot and have worked with him to find a compromise. C. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, the applicant shall record an easement that stubs to the property to the north (Parcel #R3579000012) and construct a driveway to the property to the south (Parcel #R3579000020) while recording a cross access/ingress-egress easement. The cross-access driveway shall be constructed to the property to the north when the subject property redevelops as any use other than a Vehicle sales or rental and service. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: N/A Continuation Summary: On January 7, 2024, the application for 330 N. Linder Road was presented to the City Council. The Council decided to continue the application to allow further collaboration between the applicant and staff on incorporating a cross-access stub to the north. Following the hearing, staff explored potential locations for the stub and discussed these options with the applicant. While the applicant expressed a preference to explore the feasibility of an easement instead of a stub, they also proposed a specific stub location that staff supports if the Council determines that a stub is required. Although staff has communicated the Council's preference for a stub, the applicant has requested additional discussion on this matter. Below is a summary of the proposed changes to the application for your review and consideration.  Cross Access: Staff has overlayed the revised site plan from the subject property, the property to the south, and the existing site for the property to the north for reference. The intent of doing this was to help the City Council make an informed decision on what is best for this site. Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2024-0048, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of January 21st, 2025: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2024-0048, as presented during the hearing on January 21st, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2024-0048 to the hearing date of _____ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Item #21: Pine 43 West (CR-2024-0003) Application(s):  City Council Review Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 2.18-acres of land, zoned C-G, located at the SWC of N. Webb Ave. & E. Fairview Ave. History: In November 2024, the Commission approved a CUP for a drive-through establishment in a C-G district within 300’ of existing residential uses & residential zoning. The drive-through is for a restaurant and was approved for pick-up service only; a menu board and/or speakers was not approved. Summary of Request: The UDC requires a 25’ wide landscape buffer to residential uses on C-G zoned property sharing a contiguous lot line with a residential use. Because the abutting property to the west contains a MFR use and the subject property consists of one (1) parcel of land, a buffer is required along the entire western boundary of the site rather than just adjacent to the drive-through on the southern portion of the site. The UDC allows the width of the buffer to be modified by City Council at a public hearing with notice to surrounding property owners; a reduction in the buffer width does not affect building setbacks – all structures are required to be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the district (i.e. 25'). Staff is in the process of proposing an amendment to the UDC, which would allow buildings to encroach in the buffer area if consent from the abutting property owner is obtained and if Council grants a reduced buffer width. In the interim of a code change, the Director has determined a building can encroach within the required buffer area if Council grants a reduction to the buffer width and a reduced setback and consent from the adjacent property owner is obtained for the reduced buffer and building setback. A letter of support for the reduced buffer width and associated building setback was submitted with this application from the owner of the abutting residential property to the west provided that a privacy fence and increased plantings are completed along the west boundary of the site, which will provide visual and sound buffering to the residential units. Written Testimony: No other public testimony has been received. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number CR-2024-0003, as requested by the Applicant for the hearing date of January 21, 2025: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number CR-2024-0003, as presented during the hearing on January 21, 2025, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number CR-2024-0003 to the hearing date of January 21, 2025 for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) h2 City Council Meeting01/21/2025 Lot 1(PP Lot 3)Lot 2 Future Land Use MapAerial MapZoning Map Original Site PlanRevised Site Plan •and service.”north when the subject property redevelops as any use other than a Vehicle sales or rental shall be constructed to the property to the access driveway -crossegress easement. The -the property to the south (Parcel #R3579000020) while recording a cross access/ingressthat stubs to the property to the north (Parcel #R3579000012) and construct a driveway to 3, the applicant shall record an easement -3A-“In accord with UDC 11Proposed Change: •application for the proposed use.”of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance #R3579000020) in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Linder Road. Copies granted to the properties to the north (Parcel #R3579000012) and south (Parcel egress easement -access/ingress-stubs to the north and south property lines and a cross3, the applicant shall construct driveway -3A-: “In accord with UDC 11Existing Provision C•concept plan.one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building as shown on the “No more than (5) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Road at any Proposed Change: •Road at any one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building.”: “No more than three (3) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Existing Provision B E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Plat for Stonehill Crossing Subdivision (FP-2024-0020) by David Evans and Associates, Inc., located near the South side of W. Amity Rd., midway between S. Meridian Rd. and S. Linder Rd. STAFF REPORT E T*,- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r A M O HEARING 1/21/2025 DATE: °a m Slaplclr,n o X Subdivision � TO: Mayor&City Council E ' FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner v E W - 208-884-5533 a € `�°� GR"" �i E A4ty LLC 8 F—da E AMITY ROAD SUBJECT: Stonehill Crossing No. 1 Sronehill M9ml f FP-2024-0020 °h°mh GRHH Mills Townaquare 'y I� Meda Base LOCATION: South side of W.Amity Rd., midway F G between S. Meridian Rd. & S. Linder Rd. in the north 1/2 of Section 36, T.3N., Aega;nola¢a GreyBa on Alare��i.i=p( I Preliminary Ral RAW. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat consisting of two(2)building lots on 16.06-acres of land in the R-4 and R-8 zoning districts. This is the first phase of Stonehill Crossing Subdivision. 11. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Bryan Appleby,David Evans and Associates,Inc.—9175 W. Black Eagle Rd., Boise, ID 83709 B. Owner: Kason Wedel, Stonehill Church, Inc.— 1608 N.Meridian Rd.,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant 111. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the proposed final plat for substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat(H-2023-0041)in accord with the requirements listed in UDC 11-6B-3C.2. The preliminary plat included a condition (i.e.#2.1g)for a local public street to be provided off S. Oak Briar Way between Lots 1 and 2,Block 1 for access to these lots instead of a direct access to the collector street.It was required to extend at a minimum,to the east boundary of Lot 2,Block 1 and to extend to the south with future re-subdivision of Lot 3,Block 1.Based on the City's requirement,ACHD also included conditions(i.e.#10&#11)that required a local street to be constructed between these two lots and extend to the site's east property line. Since Page 1 that time,ACHD has determined they will not allow a local street in this location.After much discussion with ACHD on this matter, Staff requests Council approval of a change to the access in this location to allow a private driveway access via S. Oak Briar Way on Lot 1,Block 1 with a temporary ingress-egress easement to Lot 2,Block 1.When an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of Lot 3,Block 1,the access easement should terminate, and access should be provided via a local public street. For the proposed final plat to be deemed in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as set forth in UDC 11-6B-3C.2,the number of buildable lots cannot increase,and the amount of common area cannot decrease. Because there is no change to the number of buildable lots and no common open space in this phase, Staff deems the proposed final plat to be in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat, as required. IV. DECISION Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat with the conditions noted in Section VI of this report. V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 7/6/23) • — Y 6 Aaauuawsao�n �. HWNi7 TIw�Eois ,p � A I iG F. III �• � I° IpI����...J � ; ��.� ���ppi; �� 1111-1i 711lli ' -JIT j •fir° a 1 lilt �i; 6 ==ado � �$"t�§�� � ;•lif 'I�� 01 i'I s 9I�lI�II� 0 CM ._.;_. �_i 1 I -- „ --- ------- ----- y' ° i o LLI if , , , �•� I 1 A No Page 3 B. Final Plat(dated: 12/13/24) 963 z is _ � a '� !- d� W a A ■ o O e • ■ v i I I � I i 7 � r • ss����E!s �� �e� _[A C7 m F ° 1 I , by �i i RI I + u 1 a o C P v _ C t W G '• - M •v �0 En N n o 11 BI QCI Cr N ■ ,eo-as I c5 I IM A f � n . \ a p $ '$ -'r�' ❑N 0 oR � � a otl un I J r / jF XXX \ �y�.yy.pt C.�."'-, i pcz Via' ,♦ \\ /r/ r d4� ;I�� I 1 I- Oo Lp Al AOTiI i�K••�M '--� e ' � ,'� ��y. ` •e 3.il.iC00N ACVZ I In �✓�I S E a s Page 5 SubdivisionStionehill Crossing Me 14 0'N lily Zp ch Bobby M 111. ©©© oo©omm m oo omm,� Mkiyarm ® Scyak mm�ma om�m�m 9 L P177W mwiriew � ommm�� mom o MY briar mm� ommmmo IcLaw mm� ommmme 1111,bm rally mmo nm��mm moo oma Mw lislypill mo moo o® mm� mom o®�mm® a bar ------- ------- �Wr�w ------------- moo comma®mm mmm mma�mmo J3 mmm9mmm mmmml m®memo o©o ©000®m mmm®coo mm m omm��m m®mm®o m®m ©mm��® mmmmamm mom omm®®® n�® piqci C. Landscape Plan(dated: 12/18/2024) N L j IN ON yy M I 1 9 n 4 1 _ �r Page 7 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development [H-2023-0041,Development Agreement Inst. #2024-031550). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat within two (2)years of City Council approval of the preliminary plat(i.e.by March 26,2026) as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7 in order for the preliminary plat to remain valid; or,a time extension may be requested. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature,have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat shown in Section V.B prepared by Idaho Survey Group,LLC, stamped on 12/13/2024 by Cody McCammon, shall be revised as follows: a. Note#5: "Lots shall not be reduced in size without prior approval from the health authority and the City of Meridian." b. Note#7: Include the recorded instrument number of the CC&R's. c. Note #10: "Direct lot access to W. Amity Road is prohibited except for the emergency vehicle access on Lot 1, Block 1 unless otherwise restricted by the Ada County Highway District." d. Note #11: "Direct lot access to S. Oakbriar Way is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the Ada County Highway District and the City of Meridian. An edditienal exception is approved for ene two (4-2)permanent driveway accesses for Lot 1, Block 1, as depicted hereon." e. Note #15: Include the recorded instrument number of the City of Meridian water main easement. f. Note #16: Include the recorded instrument number of the City of Meridian sewer main easement. g. Note #17: "A peFpetual eommo temporary ingress/egress easement is hereby reserved across Lot 1,Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2,Block 1 until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2, Block 1, at which time the easement shall cease and the access driveway on Lot 2,Block I shall be removed." h. Include the phase number in the subdivision name. i. Include the recorded instrument number of the ACHD temporary easement graphically depicted on Sheet 3. j. Include the CP&F No. on Sheet 1. k. Depict a minimum 20-foot wide street buffer along S.Oakbriar Way,a collector street,and a minimum 25-foot wide street buffer along W.Amity Rd., an arterial street,in a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement labeled as such,with a note that it will be maintained by the property owner, homeowner's association or business owner's association(as applicable) as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.2a. The buffer along W. Amity Rd. shall be measured from the ultimate curb location as anticipated by ACHD. An electronic copy of the revised plat shall be submitted prior to signature on the final plat by the City Engineer. 5. The landscape plan shown in Section V.C, dated 12/18/24, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict the right-of-way dedication for the multi-lane roundabout planned at the W. Amity Rd./Oak Briar intersection consistent with the Master Street Map; and the additional right-of-way for W.Amity Rd., as required by ACHD. b. Widen the street buffer along S. Oak Briar Way to 20-feet and the street buffer along W. Amity Rd. to 25-feet and depict landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3. Street buffers shall be measured from the back of curb or the ultimate curb location as anticipated by ACHD where the street is anticipated to be widened. i. Where the buffer is encumbered by easements or other restrictions (i.e. overhead utility line along Amity Rd.),the buffer area shall include a minimum five-foot wide area for planting shrubs and trees per UDC 11-3B-7C.lb; or, Class I trees(i.e. ornamental trees)may be planted if allowed by the utility company. ii. All street buffers are required to be planted with a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative ground cover—shrubs should be added. iii. Lawn and other grasses requiring regular mowing shall comprise no more than 65% percent of the vegetated coverage of the landscape buffer. This maximum area excludes landscaped parkway with trees.All other vegetated coverage shall be mulched and treated as planting area for shrubs or other vegetative cover. Areas along required walls and closed vision fences should generally be reserved for planting beds with a minimum of one(1)shrub per seven(7) lineal feet of frontage. iv. The calculations table should be updated to reflect compliance with the aforementioned standards, including required vs.provided number of trees, percentages and tree classifications (i.e. Class 1,11 or 111). c. Depict the edge of pavement for Amity Rd. on the plan. If the unimproved street right-of- way is 10-feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, the developer shall maintain a ten-foot compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover per UDC 11-313-7C.5. d. Depict the location of the emergency access driveway via W. Amity Rd. on Lot 1,Block 1 and label it as such. 6. All existing structures that do not comply with the setbacks of the R-4 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-5 shall be removed from the site prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature. 7. All fencing shall comply with the standards of UDC 11-3A-7C. 8. The existing home on Lot 2, Block 1 shall connect to City water and sewer service within 60 days of it becoming available and disconnect from private service as set forth in MCC 9-1-4 and 9-4-8. 9. The address of the existing home on Lot 2, Block 1 shall change with recordation of the subdivision. 10. The ingress-egress easement depicted on Lot 1,Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2,Block 1 shall be temporary until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of the adjacent property; at such time, the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 via Lot 1 shall be removed. Page 9 11. Underground pressurized irrigation water shall be provided to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 with development of the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 12. A sign shall be erected at the terminus of the collector stub street(S.Oak Briar Way)that states the street will be extended and widened in the future as required by ACHD. 13. All development shall comply with the dimensional standards for the R-4 or R-8 zoning district, as applicable, listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-5 and 11-2A-6,respectively. 14. The final plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed church on Lot 1,Block 1 as set forth in the Development Agreement. 15. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation Stonehill Crossing Sub No. 1 0020-2024-File Number: FP–Stonehill Crossing Sub No. 1 0020-2024-File Number: FP– Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Subdivision No. 1Stonehill Crossing Meridian RoadLinder RoadAmity Road Location–Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Location– Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Amity Road future roundaboutway for -of-Road rightReservation of Amity from Amity Roadto southern boundary collector road extension south -New northTotal of two (2) lotsFinal Plat includes:Current Phase–Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Current Phase– Final Plat includes:WayOakbriarAmity Road Final Plat–Subdivision No. 1 Stonehill Crossing Final Plat–Subdivision No. 1 Stonehill Crossing 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1future roundaboutway for -of-Road rightReservation of Amity from Amity Roadto southern boundary collector road extension south -New northTotal of two (2) lots Future Amity Road Roundabout Planning 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1future roundaboutway for -of-Road rightReservation of Amity Plat includes:Future Amity Road Roundabout Planning Existing Home Entrance/exit existing residenceeasement for egress -Ingress SubdivisionFuture Residential SubdivisionFuture Residential Future Residential Subdivision 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Site PlanChurchStonehill Site PlanChurchStonehill Entrance/exitAccess onlyEmergency to Remain Stonehill Crossing Subdivision Permanent Amity Road Circulation–Stonehill Crossing Subdivision Circulation– Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1(4) desire of owner of Lot 2, Block 1 for permanent access location via a driveway from the north.in a short distance ~ 8% grade); and(3) the topography on east side of Lot 2, Block 1 (approximately 6.5 feet of elevation to overcome located on Lot 2, Block 1;(2) driveway access from the north is more conducive to location of existing garage and driveway location of driveway access to Lot 2, Block 1 will appear and function much like a public street);(1) functionality of access via Lot 1, Block 1 private driveway (i.e., private church driveway at due to the following considerations:permanentegress easement depicted on Lot 1, Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2, Block 1 shall be -The ingressProposed Revision to Condition #10via Lot 1 shall be removed.adjacent property; at such time, the access easement shall terminate and the driveway on Lot 2 temporary until such time as an alternate access is available for Lot 2 with development of the egress easement depicted on Lot 1, Block 1 for the benefit of Lot 2, Block 1 shall be -The ingressCurrent Condition #10 Lot 2, Block 1 AccessLot 2, Block 1 Access 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FP Questions?0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Questions? Stonehill Crossing Sub No. 1 0020-2024-File Number: FP–Stonehill Crossing Sub No. 1 0020-2024-File Number: FP– Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Subdivision No. 1Stonehill Crossing Meridian RoadLinder RoadAmity Road Location–Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Location– Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Amity Road future roundaboutway for -of-Road rightReservation of Amity from Amity Roadto southern boundary collector road extension south -New northTotal of two (2) lotsFinal Plat includes:Current Phase–Stonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Current Phase– Final Plat includes:WayOakbriarAmity Road Final Plat–Subdivision No. 1 Stonehill Crossing Final Plat–Subdivision No. 1 Stonehill Crossing 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1future roundaboutway for -of-Road rightReservation of Amity from Amity Roadto southern boundary collector road extension south -New northTotal of two (2) lots Future Amity Road Roundabout Planning 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1future roundaboutway for -of-Road rightReservation of Amity Plat includes:Future Amity Road Roundabout Planning Existing Home Entrance/exit existing residenceeasement for egress -Ingress SubdivisionFuture Residential SubdivisionFuture Residential Future Residential Subdivision 0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Site PlanChurchStonehill Site PlanChurchStonehill Entrance/exitAccess onlyEmergency to Remain Stonehill Crossing Subdivision FutureTemporary Amity Road Circulation–Stonehill Crossing Subdivision Circulation– Questions?0020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 10020-2024-File Number: FPStonehill Crossing Subdivision No. 1 Questions? W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing continued from January 7, 2025 for 330 N. Linder Rd. (H- 2024-0048) by Nicholas Rinker, located at 330 N. Linder Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0048 A. Request: Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district to operate a Vehicle Sale or Rental and Service Facility. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: January 21, 2025 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 20 PROJECT NAME: 330 N. Linder Rd (H-2024-0048) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 2 Q 0 N ' i7 ' �� c�-rod 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Mayor Robert E. Simison city council fwhibeis: IIAN Luke Cavener,President Liz Strader,lice President D A H Brian 17itlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts January 21',2025 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council CC: City Clerk, City Attorney FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner RE: 330 N. Linder Road AZ(H-2024-0048) On January 7,2024,the application for 330 N. Linder Road was presented to the City Council. The Council decided to continue the application to allow further collaboration between the applicant and staff on incorporating a cross-access stub to the north. Following the hearing, staff explored potential locations for the stub and discussed these options with the applicant. While the applicant expressed a preference to explore the feasibility of an easement instead of a stub,they also proposed a specific stub location that staff supports if the Council determines that a stub is required. Although staff has communicated the Council's preference for a stub,the applicant has requested additional discussion on this matter. Below is a summary of the proposed changes to the application for your review and consideration. • Cross Access: Staff has overlayed the revised site plan from the subject property, the property to the south, and the existing site for the property to the north for reference. The intent of doing this was to help the City Council make an informed decision on what is best for this site. { � � � - :� � . � � . ' � � � - � � « m ¥ � . | � � �a . - .. | . , / � � / a! � � �� . ��� , I � " � v»w= � _ _ � � !� � �� ,� � � �� i � � ■ � � � .� . -�_ � . , : � \ � \ | � � � ��' �, / _ � � %� - . �, �� � � � � .. � a- . I � . a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CE�� PIDIAN*,,--, iDAHO DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/7/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council Area of Impact City Limits FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner 0 Analysis LLI 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Nicholas Rinker SUBJECT: H-2024-0048 330 Linder Road Annexation C. LOCATION: Located at 330 N. Linder Road in the SE 0 '/4 of Section 12, T.3N.,R.IW. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L(Light Industrial)zoning for the proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service. B. Issues/Waivers The applicant has received a letter from the northern property owner to allow for a reduced landscape buffer to the residential property. This reduction will be from 25 feet to 5 feet.With this letter, staff finds the intent of the dimensional standards is being met. The applicant is seeking Council waiver to reduce this buffer as requested. The existing building is proposed to remain which will cause it to be non-conforming with the 35- foot street setback. C. Recommendation Staff. Approval. Commission Recommendation: Approval. D. Decision Council: City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview 11. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial/Car Dealership - Existing/Proposed Zoning R1 in Ada County V.A.2 Future Land Use Designation General Industrial V.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 8/26/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/5/2024 Site posting date 11/23/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District III.0 • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Shared access with the property to the south. - • Traffic Level of Service Better than E. - ITD Comments Received Yes - Meridian Public Works Wastewater III.B • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns Yes: See comments below. Meridian Public Works Water III.B • Distance to Mainline Available at site - • Impacts or Concerns No Note: See section III. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received or see public record hgps://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=362253&dbid=0&redo=Meridian0ty. City of Meridian I Department Report III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview This property is designated as General Industrial on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). The use of vehicle sales or rental and service is consistent with the comprehensive plan for the general industrial designation. The subject site is among several Industrial properties along Linder Road in the immediate area. The proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and services is a permitted use in the I-L zoning which is the zoning the applicant is requesting. In conjunction with the existing industrial users surrounding this property,the proposed use satisfies the general industrial designation on the comprehensive plan. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History N/A Acreage 1.0 acre B. History and Process The subject property is part of an enclave area surrounded by City annexed property. Annexation of this land will provide more efficient provision of City services. Industrial uses exist to the west across N. Linder Rd and to the south and east; single-family residences exist to the north and in Ada County. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The existing residence is proposed to remain as the main office for the vehicle sales business. The building shall abandon well and sceptic and connect to city services at the time of annexation in accord with UDC. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service is a permitted use in the I-L zoning district and aligns with the surrounding area. By adding additional industrial properties in the city,this project contributes to the community's employment and economic growth. Specifically, it adheres to Policy 3.07.01D,which encourages the preservation of industrial land use areas by discouraging non-industrial users. Additionally,the proposal is consistent with Policy 3.06.02D,which recommends locating industrial uses close to state highways and the rail corridor. The property's location adjacent to Linder Road enhances its accessibility to both the rail corridor and state highways. Staff finds the proposed use to be consistent with the UDC and Comprehensive Plan. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards of the I-L zoning district in UDC Table 11-3B-3. The applicant has received a letter from the northern property owner to allow for a reduced landscape buffer to the residential property. This reduction will be from 25 feet to 5 feet and requires City Council waiver to reduce the buffer as proposed. Staff is supportive of the reduction since the adjacent property will more than likely develop with an industrial use in the future. Additionally,the existing building will be non-conforming if annexed due to the 35-foot setback requirement off Linder Road. The building is roughly 37-feet off the curb line but is within the 35-feet when measured from the ultimate right of way. If approved,this would City of Meridian I Department Report create a non-conforming building and any new construction will be required to comply with the I-L dimensional standards. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): Vehicle Sales or rental and service—UDC 11-4-3-38: A. Vehicle repair may be allowed as an accessory use, subject to the standards for vehicle repair,major, and minor,in the district where the use is located. The applicant is proposing a future maintenance shop for vehicle repair purposes. While this is not going to be a use established on the site with the initial development, the applicant will come through permitting for establishing this accessory use in the future. B. Inoperable or dismantled motor vehicles shall be stored behind a closed vision fence, wall,or screen or within an enclosed structure and shall not be visible from any street. The applicant is proposing a future maintenance shop that will house any inoperable vehicles. In the interim, there will be no inoperable or dismantled cars on the site. C. Automotive sales and rental areas shall be subject to the minimum perimeter landscape requirement of parking areas in chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title. The minimum perimeter landscape requirements are being met and a reduction of the northern 25 foot landscape buffer is requested through a council waiver. D. In addition to chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title, one(1) square foot of landscaping for every fifty(50) square feet of vehicle display area shall be provided. The site has 540 square feet ofproposed vehicle display area which means 11 square feet of landscaping is required and the applicant exceeds this landscaping requirement. E. Vehicle display pads are prohibited in the required landscape buffers. The vehicle display is outside of the required 12.5 foot with water conserving design landscape buffer along Linder Road fulfilling this requirement. However, the applicant shall only be allowed to have 3 vehicles displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. UDC 11-3A-19 discusses the importance of building frontage along public roads and requires a minimum of 30%of the fagade to occupy the frontage. By limiting the display vehicles to 3, staff finds the fagade will maintain is prominent form along the frontage. F. Vehicle display areas shall incorporate design features including,but not limited to, landscape islands, curbing,and pedestrian walkways,that define main drive aisles and internal circulation patterns. The concept plan shows curbing around the vehicle display with landscaping on both sides to meet this requirement. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets The applicant is proposing waterwise landscaping which allows for a 50%reduction in street landscape buffers. A 12.5-foot wide street buffer is required to be constructed along N. City of Meridian I Department Report Linder Rd., an arterial street,measured from back of sidewalk, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Landscaping requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. ii. Parking lot landscaping Parking lot landscaping is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. A minimum 5-foot wide buffer should be provided along the east property boundary unless the requirement is reduced or waived by the Director for truck maneuvering areas as set forth in UDC 11-3B-8C.1a. Staff recommends the applicant shift the planter islands to the eastern buffer where the easement begins to maximize the parking on site. Landscaping requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses A 25-foot wide buffer is required to the residential land use to the north as set forth in UDC Table 11-2C-3 and 11-4-3-34F, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The Applicant requests City Council approval of a reduced buffer width from 25-to 5-feet adjacent to the residential use to the north as allowed by UDC 11-313-9C.2 with notice to surrounding property owners.A reduction to the buffer width shall not affect building setbacks; all structures shall be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the I-L district(i.e.25-feet).A letter was submitted from the abutting property owner to the north, Christopher and Angela Olson,agreeing to the proposed reduced buffer.While the landscape buffer will be reduced,the building will still be 25 feet from the north property line. Additionally,the eastern landscape buffer shall be landscaped in accordance with the irrigation districts' allowances. iv. Tree preservation A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. v. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along N. Linder Road. 2. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6 requires one space for every two thousand(2,000) sq. ft. of gross floor area in industrial districts. The applicant has provided 27 parking spaces which exceeds the UDC requirement. However,the applicant shall provide details for where customers will park on the lot. This shall be separate from the vehicles for sale on the property. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G; bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. Bicycle parking is not depicted in the plans and shall be included with the certificate of zoning compliance application. 3. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): The applicant is proposing to keep the existing residence and convert it into the main office. Since the building is proposed to remain, it is not subject to the architectural standards. However, a tenant improvement permit will be required from the Meridian Building City of Meridian I Department Report Department to convert the residence into a commercial building.Additionally,the applicant is proposing a future maintenance building that will be required to comply with the architectural standards manual. 4. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): The applicant is not proposing fencing with this application. However, staff recommends a 6- foot tall privacy fence is installed and maintained on the north boundary to help buffer the neighboring residential. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): One(1)full driveway access exists to this site via Linder Rd.that is proposed to be eliminated, and the applicant will share access with the property to the south through a cross- access agreement. The intent of the UDC(11-3A-3) is to improve safety by combining and/or limiting access points to arterial streets to ensure motorists can safely enter all streets. Where local street access is not available,the property owner is required to grant cross-access/ingress-egress easements to adjoining non-residential properties. Although the use to the north is currently residential, it's anticipated to change to a non-residential use at some point in the future. The use to the south is commercial; as a provision of the development agreement, a cross- access/ingress-egress easement was required to be provided to the subject property at the time of future construction on the site and/or expansion of the existing parking lot,which has not occurred. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, Staff recommends as a provision of the development agreement, driveway stubs are constructed to the north and south property lines and a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granted to the properties to the north(Parcel #R3579000012) and south(Parcel#R3579000020)in an effort to combine and limit access points to the arterial street(i.e.Linder Rd.). Copies of the recorded easements should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. While a fire truck turnaround is provided on-site,the applicant shall widen the cross-access from the south to a 25-foot drive aisle. Additionally,the applicant shall work with our fire department to ensure the turning radius for the entrance is sufficient. This will be analyzed with the certificate of zoning compliance. 2. Sidewalk/Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): An attached 7-foot wide sidewalk was recently constructed along N. Linder Rd. along the frontage of this site. The Pathways Plan designates a 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway in this area. Because the sidewalk was recently constructed,the Park's Dept. does not recommend it's removed and a new pathway constructed in its place at this time. If a new pathway is constructed in the future,there should be adequate room within the existing right- of-way(11'+/-) for the pathway without dedication of a public use easement. F. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. City of Meridian I Department Report 2. Storm Drainage (UDC I1-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. III. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. A final plat or certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: A. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. B. No more than three(3) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building. C. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,the applicant shall construct driveway stubs to the north and south property lines and a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granted to the properties to the north(Parcel#R3579000012)and south(Parcel#R3579000020) in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Linder Road. Copies of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. D. The applicant shall install a 6-foot-tall privacy fence on the north property boundary to help buffer the neighboring residential. E. The existing structure is nonconforming with the 35-foot setback along N. Linder Road. Any future expansion will require compliance with the I-L zoning regulation per UDC 11-2C-3. City of Meridian I Department Report B. Meridian Public Works wastewater Distance to Sewer Available at Site Serwiws + Sewer Shed Estimated Project Seeappllcatlon Sewer ERU's • WERF Declining Balarrtp + Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan{Facili r Plan r I mpacts{canoerns + See Publ le Works Slte S cific Conditions water + Distance to Water Water AvailableatSite Senrims PressumZone Estimated Project see appl leatlon Water ERt!'s Ww+ ergauality None + Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan ImpactVConcemr, N one-Ensure rno trees are I ocated withl n 10'Gf the Water Meter NON-PLAT CONDITIONS PUBUC'WORY4 DEPARTMENT 5iie Specific Conditions of Approval I_ If a+rWel l it 10"Vd an tlu siu it must ht abpmdcmodl pvt regulmory requirements and PAPof of abandonment must be provided to the City, 2. Ensure no sewer services pass ll Bough infiltration benches, 3_ Provide HIP Easements For mains,hydrmt laterals a,td water sirvices. Easements shoLdd Oxlond up to the end of mftiWhydmntlwater meter and 1.0'heytmd it. 5. No pemtaiient.s"ctures(tree%,hushes,buildings,carport,trash receptacle walls, fences, infiltration trenches. light poles, ctc_)tobt:built within the utility eawrnLntt. CenOral Conditions of Approval l. Applicam shall coordinale water and swer main size mW routing with the Public Works Depaninaot. 2_ PtK Meridian City C'adc(NIC'C),the"Iir!ant shall br"pomsibie 1p in"I sewCr r]nd walcr mains to and through this&vclopment. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agmcmcm For infrastnEctvrc enhancement per MCC s 5, City of Meridian I Department Report 3_ The applicant shall pmvide easemern(s)for all public water/sewer maims outside of public right of away(include all water services aitd hydrants)_ Sewerfwater easement varies depending on 94wor depth.Srwer U-20 ft doLrp require a 30 ft-L Swmcnt,20-25 ft a 40 ft rkWMCnt,and 25-30 Il 1145 d casement. Ensurc no permment structures(trees,busbcs,buildings,carpans,trash morptaole walls,fences,infiltration wenches,light poles,etc.)are built within[he utility casarnem. &Ibntit an executed easement(on the form available front Public Works),a legal description pr4p0rVd by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surueyw,which must include the area of the eascmwnl (marked EXHIBIT A)and an 8113'x I I"rnup with bearings and distances(marked F-Xl-110IT 3) for review.Both exhibits must he waled,signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor.DO NOT RECORD. 4_ The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3 111-6).The applicant should be required to use any existing surkm or well water for the primary source_ If a surface or well source is rat available,a single-p0iet eonne4tion to the culinary water syswm 5ha11 be rLxgUirrd_I F A sin�]e-point.oonnceliart is 111;l i serf the developer m ill be responsible for the paymcnt ofasscssrncnts foT the common areas prior to prior to Tecciving&velopment plan approval. S_ Any structures that are al lowed to retrain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in oampliance w iih MCC- 6- All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive rafnatural waterways,intersecting, er05$ing OF baying AdiACent And ermtiguouS to thr W&inning subdi%�dUd shall be bddmS2e3 per UDC I l-3A-6, In performing such veock,the appl i cant shall complywith IdahoCc&42-1207 and any otherapplisablc law or wguiation, 7_ Any wells Thal wiI l not continue to W used must be properly abandoned according to]d;dto W0 Consttwction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resourect. 'N- Developrr's Engineer shrill pMvide S statement addressing whettuK there tare any existing walls in the drvelopunerit,and if so,how they will continur to br used,qr PFMidc rrOof4(if their abandonment. x_ Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from servicc per City Ordinano 5sction 9-1-4 and 9 4 8, Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9_ Al l improvements relatod to public life,safety and huttlih shall be oornplctcd pritw to occupancy of the structures, 10, Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection tees_as detertu ined duriug the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a pl mi approval letter. 1_ It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the AmonCAns with DissbililirS ACL and OW Fair]lousing Act. 12. Applicant shall bt`responsible for application and compliancc with any Section 404 Pcrmining that may be required by the Army Corps of Enginccrs. 13. Dcvcloper shall coord i uate mailbox locations with the Meridian Pas[Office_ 14_ Cornpacticm test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving enginccred backfil I,whtKe footing wcruld sit atop fil l rbatefiNl_ 15_ Thu design rngincer shall be rcquirjud to certify that the street ofnwKne elevations ue mat a minimum of 3-fc0 above the hiShest establ i shed perk groundwater cle ation, IN s is w=urc that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes,is at least 1-foot above_ 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction ofan irrigation diS4110 or AC'HD.The design enginrurShall provide ccrtifitulirm 1hA1 the fstilitieS bAVC been inmallcd itt aCeordbncc with the appverd design plans.This certifu:Atinn will be required before a CCrUfieAic of occupancy is issued for any structures within the pealed. City of Meridian I Department Report 17_ At the completion-of the prge-ci,the appl leant shall be risponsibke to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the imuancc of a OcniFiicatinn of nrcuppnry for any suuctures within the proj-ta 18, A street light plan will need w be included in the civil construction plans.Street light plan requirements are listed in scetion 6r5 of Ibc Improvement Standards for Street 1-19171in9,A copy ofthe standards can be found at hup. wwtw_mcridianwy.oigrpublic_works.aspr:1id=u7;. 19_ The City of k 1uridian requires that the owne r post io the Ci ty a perfonnance surety in tku:Amount of 1251Ya of thr total crmscn-wLion cost far all imomptctc vXwrer,water and reuse iTAhStructurc prior to final plo-u signntura.This surety wilt he verified by a 1iM item Cost ewtimaw pr*Vidvd by the owner to the City,The sutcty can be posted in the form of an i rrcvocabl a Icttcr of ctcdi t,cash deposit or bond.Appiimat must file au application for surety,which can be found on tilt: Conf iliunity Developtucnt Depantuettt website. Please contact Land Development ScrVica tfiar snore infotmation at 88'7-221 t_ 20_ Thu City of lVieridian rk�quims that thr owncK post t0 the City a warranty Surety in the wnnun r of 2Wo of the total consinw1icm cost for all completed scswcr,ti+'4 r and reuse infr Lstructurc for duration of two years.This surety swill be verif ed by a line itctta cost craim ate provided by the OWFker to the City_The surety can be posted in the fomt of an irrevocable letter of credit_cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found an the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for mim information at 887-221 t. City of Meridian I Department Report C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) NdM PeauIM1Q,vrsLearn ACHD w , f lime C'Mdawm Carl W=1lw rv&,W- ow.mcwltl"Carlmmon Dote; Septer+titler 27.'2024 TO: NkhQld5 kin ker,via 4wna,l Staff Contact:uaraLeigh Trayer,Planner Pr.i5Jt-tt E4MrlptI0ft Lihdbr P6M Car ALMIAl&SaMS This ii,an anriiexetiorl and Feaone applira[ion for The development of a 1,194 square foot office space and 1.4n sq uare foot automobile mai ffWnance soap on 627-acres_ Tnp GenLFFMN x TW devebgrnent•S e3tlrngned W$enLIIWe 2-r Veh li:M tr4ps per cuy. 3 vahkle trip M hour rrl tyre PM peak hour,batted on the IMitUto Of TrampOnat+4r% ENirw4rrr Trip Generation Manua1,TV editiwL L05 Planning Tivesholdir in r he ruture with planned Comments; The tables above lest the existlrlg condltronsof"surrounding rwd4 4,ys+ it hlovt the prQpQwd 49%*IQp neM?is this applicatipn i€for annex@TMn arld rezor*onry.with a future Oevelppmenr a ppicatran,this wnvnalry wi,Il Ile updated torw%ct the 0av9WpRtient and di impxt, conr*ctingij,ou to more Ache rlryidgh ay rSmr.T.ME/dame Szrc -C-vdi Goy,ID-M71a-Ph.URMY-GX10-FX3aFW.SC.�a[rd.amray IV. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: City of Meridian I Department Report 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the Applicant's proposal to annex 1.0-acre of land with I-L zoning for the development of a vehicle sales or rental service facility is consistent with the General Industrial FL UM designation for this property. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment to I-L and conceptual development plan generally complies with the purpose statement of the I-L district in that it will encourage industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are operated entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures and is accessible to an arterial street(i.e. Linder Rd.). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed industrial use should be conducted entirely within a structure. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. IV. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5t'',2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor:Nick Rinker and Matt Wilke b. In opposition:None C. Commenting d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application:Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. Cross access to the property to the north. Creating a non-conforming structure with the approval of this application. The amount of vehicles being_displayed along Linder Road. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s)for City Council: City of Meridian I Department Report a. The number of vehicles being displayed along Linder Road and cross-access to the northern property. Staff has talked with the applicant and ITD about vehicle display areas as ITD requires 5 spaces. Staff is proposinga hange to this DA provision forte consideration. Additionally,the applicant would like to defer cross-access until his property is redeveloped into a use separate from a vehicle sales or rental and service center. Staff is proposing alternative language to allow for the cross-access to be deferred until redevelopment of the subject property. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report •- CHERRY - FAI 10 , U11 .. .ir Y PINE. ■ .. moJ . f I i+j Air, R� Jr - i � t , o Q u „. %41"tw, All �, LU ■■■■il�=�. ■ � � rrrur■ �� r■ �■ •. .. � � �';� il1l�■u11111■■r `III � - ��1r111■lrri■■ • ■� �..■■�� � ■.r■■lalll fin■�_ A �r1�11�� i r �■ ��■■i■rrr■rr l�.��_ ■■■r■■i■■■�■■� w.Ig111■■111 1■11■■ rLl■C - _ ■IIIIr1111 ! `�I �,�`�L����� fill FRANKL-IN- � MEN Illllllllll ■i�i nunuu� O■r�i.■■ y■EVA!a■i■■ rfif■i f■ �■��~ �■1 ■r■■■rrl1R��r�� � 0 LLI �w.r ■■■■■!!� • � Q>•w r1 �■ ■■■i■ii■ ii - - ■ r"r [[[[u11111■■[ `Iul ■�llllllllll[■■ J ■■r■lllrl�■ll■ A i■lull!■ 7■ w • ■�,[1111�.. i �� ■-■oil■■■iol 1� w I.■■■■■■■i■■f■[I :i1r1111■■111 ■IN�00 • y•-` i�ni■► 1■r` ll am ■11■ �i!■ l■■ 1■I 111■ 11� IVVYi_!a y�1 1�� ��� ■�C-■ l r±'r Ilr1 11..its in [l�,Ai.'PC7 wi■ n qr i�[I 11■��� . ��I O�► �� O 1� ���; � J!##! Illrrr■■�■111:1.:+I■ • ��•� mil!■; 1 111 - ■ n 11 llrr •■•■■, Vir1u111urm�►■ A I�III r1■l� �'��'I`r�lh�� r - • FRANKL'IN NMI - . - mil r<► �#;Gf�illl��[ J�I� ,�,: as .� � p ulllrr. � -'III "■�muw.� ■■era :�— .■ ■milt ■l�l�,�,� �p[�■[[1■ [[Il New ■■lrlllp ii■ ■■ LU —+�w.■ ■wool"! ■■■ w a �i ■■■■■■■■ iiOWED7■ - .. y �Il 11l[[u1111[■■ `III ' ■■lllllllll![■■ � � ■■r■lrlrr�■tit � ��■■lull■■ �■■I w ■■!7■� ��i ll! `� i�■■ililll ■�■ III ���Ai�1[1111 w� i 1�■ \ ■w■i■■■■tiol 1�+w °n�' � ■Imo■■■■i■■i■■�■II � :�Iruu■out■■111■� E lEii.► ,■■ ll C. 1 '�� ,■■ �iwli sell �►11i11; Ilr �: •r=�:`�IJ■ ::: ro� :■■ llilll�■■■Ill" rr;.iC I■■■�� l y■ - N ■r a■■ '!■■■11111 ■■IIu11 11,C i■♦ w�■ ���= 1 a 1■ � w � �■Ill 1 ws■ 11:! ■ i.N i it 11111 -' l Ilr jlluw\�� ■ A■ ■II■11111 Neill■ ■�Aal■ ■ N 1 11 arm � � ■ ■ 11 i WINE ■ l e� 1 � `_F_RANKLIN� �����■ � ■ gn 1 a■■nl�in—rrl �■ I �■■■�`�1� *fYrs �� ■ •tr�C 1111 ■uwlnnnu' ■■ wIy� ._ I� ■p mn■dl■�J I� B. Subject Site Photos 4 1- ,ems.:•• -; � .�`�:`�s,. _ .' of City of Meridian Department Report C. Service Accessibility Report Description Lceation Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Within 100 yrfloodplain & < 2 acres RED Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing # of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN Either a High Schaal or College within 2 miles OR. a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile drivin.-. GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report A Site Plan(date: 11/4/2024) CL 5pg E S IS C wr •a�a.s��a�wrw� w.ww 15 @ �"P .[ Alwn We�eYa F� 9 g. � F a i TARCHI tLC7URAL SITE PLAN City of Meridian I Department Report E. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map ELSE iGEBRIISON LAND SURVEYS,PLLC 2261 Sumac Sf+Nar,Bwe,Jdeho&3706 TeiVharre(20)$* 6m rr&&@eo wys.mm t7 OCbb§r 2024 F=L$ft)ed Na 74097E r.wnd GowApuon EXHIBIT A Lat 3 of liappem A,cro Suhdivlsna J8.'ewdrd plat cn file in&]olr 20 of Rats aA Page 129a rKQnjs cf A k Gmmn ,Idehc) erd�i pQrWi to N SPA of$Ocdon i 21 T.3 N..R.11U,.9,M2,Mer,dlan Ada Caunly,Idaho:dmatcd as Ulam: Cwmercing a1 a dearrd drams cep mQinU"ML maf"the 44W oalnFI of AO 8*�i or Seatian 12,thence SOLN.-1 lg almg the weMk Ir9 od eaid Secfim$OD'31'3Er W a dstance of Wd 124W.Lb th9 POUF OF KUNMING' Thenaele Oi9saldline598"13U Ea4istainof4C.01faetieafoaridSterolpinmonurneM4thenplhwesl amner of 960 Lol 3 an the eaMPe l4yMs�ine or Narlh--k&r Road. ThmmIwA*q said nghm-cd.Wspw9cimiruing*(NMnpfLPrdfly fine af*aid Lat39W13 Eamstanneof 116.6;feat 63 a found sie$I Viu nmumemkq Me nrrit*W camAr or said La; TtYk"seulhedy aroig the eml lire of said lW S WSV N a ftuncs od 120A W 1k a fwnd eleel on rmnumanoN liresouRleaslearnerof9W Lol; Itwoe w+anMa along the SoUltrorl!inA or said Lot N W13'52'W it dWarce of 316.62 fleet t ths Mufhrreet Comr of ssid lot an the eas"Nhb-O-wq irx,of W Math Ljrjder Read; Thence 6euing said fins fi W 13'52 h'g dstaam of 44.t17 feei to a pain-:�m Il:e wmsbBdy Lhe of sad Section 1 T. Therwe nAhedy moms said wmtedp IIN of 5adw 12 N C4'31W E a dislarrae of 120M kw to ttio RUN-OF LSE NNINS. Theabovm-descrihednOQfrW4COR3hE42,030 square feeLmmorb %ajNEdmeIIOISWi eawments and righly.of. ,wary. e' J8 9 g! Ka FI$lPrelgpg'�UIf�4[�66ti W4'+r'Le]�le'�U.'5]A Dex fo-mrrc+epgn 99t .d€rt City of Meridian Department Report — IV LINDER ROAD ------ — _ 74#2 75 { I �4 fd 003i'39" E P20.CQ' t j r I � Q ca �to y w 2 Z I y_ rn 00 Qr "1s roil Sp IQ LW 0 Puzi City of Meridian Department Report C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation 330 N Linder Rd �' �� � � '.��. ' 4 iJJ.I' - �� '4 �•.��_ .t ._ . i!�!' i 1 tr` � - — �� _ �* � � .�. �,� � - '� a� � _ _-s � -� -- � �r � i [ } _ f� �i + i i r `: i �� �!, �. �' � - . ,�. LANDSCAPE BUFFER U-24,0EO SF ASPHALT PAYING LAINOSCARE PLANTERS 4 58B°1S'SYE 31H8T _ J S •�y�P. 4 F":3 ':j:• a�-�• "-i r"�Y �::s„�}.r_.'`.•'r Y:'�d��.;•"•rr+:3��{:: _.�s.i' _ � _ _ ]i✓ -��^�,j^rt:i` -`i r}; - '•' �`w:l:5�r'tif \k�-wF,:+=, L ryr t :v:� � � - - - f•....r}.t i '�..ff �!'?-4: Y' {s�'i1:f5J':-tip`�;:. 'L '`.'fs: •t v'-'Se., �: fir_�.rt 7. 7b4 X¢� as, � ty'�. ••t' S�k:;;.���:;=r o ,rt' �L ��• - ,5r. :r.���.4';.L Y. '.. ?r.. 1 4;r. .rSf,+�., ti"�{4i:;��:%::L Y•yy. Hp4•t' + nT•r�[8]Bx1B PARKING S:�YL'J:4 rn F,mi.y. ti3."a'�1��:•..!'.��1.'e�ifs' E 3SFING IDEWALiC I1 9i s A J:•t.ti ,4: c.G'_.JY 4.,.�J i r: v ). }yti5:i - POTS-l.Cr.' ':Yt 8 ?�. -• rA 7e t .yJn:� �� ��xrti you elf- ,� �.:r r, YB PARKING }�• L<,:t.;,<,;f, 5..'::,'�:,.rr¢ti: . ,a siel{ •��«'-y';,IF;:. ;.'� .r. `r '.., r'ry. .-� ,r.:.:.. H:?.� � - ;r- . - -L .E.',. _- ••,y..,. ',1;:.,r{c r•}'FI v�S.S rt.' 'a1 ems- =a 3Sr;•: �4;. :i�.:' A""' ,�i'r'.. �" a:li'•� � '"'..ir^y:•�:�tu{.:y:x ai'.:`i�e.•�...,.r✓i'r:.asa.}.'�+yy r}ti�6:•. ti lritih `-i:<m .s�:;+. :1: ''.+.: i�' _."i y.ey �.-.. `a.r�-f:.��_. :-a r: ,:di r '.4� ?�:�; i-1�•7.h1 .[ �''�•"a ._i-va::`•:':Ord w"''t.�F`.Ih f�Irv.- ,;ice .6: �}Y,P'`�',•sy � �a.1:'•. i[ �k'::':ih -'`�•�1_ :'')•��• S i':1 Y15 a, J� .4�4: aaksC�:,S f3:'4• �.:-'IL(�•s •1.,_AV•: .ti4 ,tx; "U•• '•i - SSS,�:• {-1.'r= f,. Y1n rya A�m��j ••,i.; ♦w�'}'• y f 7 L�Py Y.�:•-.• [T•�^.._ti,. �N�],i':•YYs ~• y'' ;Y4::•tit 4 "�'`v>k:%'-'Y..:��_?�.�,.,^.-'+r;il' 'ro`;.i ,�,�.{:�.}, .1r:.rn...,f'•:r'r+.�m:e^tK j:f'•"•� "'t''"1'.'. ¢s _ s[.aE.'•':?'y Y,` ,':•.lie %:1{:'.-y.?;•s ...Z.�'F:- ?5°,�F.w';• �'ti{ft::. _ i,fir: '°, "�Tei1:.+,r.S'�: !1 ti: i�:� `.y i '�" Q r.ti,:? •- +i-tiea•ti.'... .:,�.•+.na::y� ■ <," f�_ x%5w•ii_4' J: #r:s* i SO'�' Q :_�:': l..e.R.'}:'Y•'. 4 e. 24 / i r,.f Tt . �._,.Jr. `•r;','4. r.-'`�u-�;�Y•,r+.{�. + :.r•• ..r•r�'' j? sf-:y,. G �.1 �ir.:.r t-..., is.:�F:r'�Yi!,,?:'.•:'F.�y;, .n.•-.' e- Lu �'UUIIEIENT, ;s' -i' _:� __ _ .r r* .}�+,.�. Tr't •, .W':?.�_r'_:�a'•'�i�,•w v. n� S�?"-• yp.; } .S�•,� _ •. .yi'l:?ti}'a'�i ad' �• a•'-c I :a. ii•, s•'r, 4 ,i,�•_ d r{ y lFl:�'yir,•j'•y=":l,w;4}: .� - i'f.S}SL�i Y'• .. -::iT}Bx14 PARKING P ~.s I} 'Sa'. .^.i 1. rl :�� fr.•r.�,.r{y. F•••f'.rS_ •q+f$]9x 14 PARKIN{i SPOTg75 b fir • : ''iy�SS P.5p - _ y' !•,'r. n' l..g I�`.yfi its.}�}r,.s�e�:j- y#i -" r m,R DSC E BIJFFER .4: i:;: :.;.�ra�..7SL YES: _ _ _ _� Wi'H�.ri.'•�'3 •=-3[G.2:-! S-XlY' ;,•f 'S i"� _l:>r•� "x�L__r~ :t i'''••;.�v �� I :T"i..:!>i �.r. � .VV .. - jja�r ,F .. .x, �l .,r:. � •+_t _-�':,•;'y--f I .v y�i'.....l:i W#•rY'..�y.. 7 _ _ '1'y 1•s#:.: :}, CENTERLINE 12'$' 21'$•:r}.: ._•.. {Fi . ..n �1. 2".'rif: e,v.yY.t S 4.°,•". .i '� �^.l v�ff`. .�:F:1:cM-- {.I/ IRRTCATION +: `i97iY E][IST111!"a_n.•. w'y .•. A. plc 4e SPOTS r. _2w .r,� ,h •!y,'- I DRCH RIFY}.Y �• «.[ <f. $J{.�:yyA���.+:rj�a i9I 14 PARKING f ,t^ .. .. :!•-.- :"y_: :'} Stiq•'-_. A.r...r - i .F3}4.19 RARKINGS T Ylr rw_ •ryC❑NCRETE PAT) )I 5 ��ai• -JyS•^�++ai:+;Y:'y 4.:_a�..ffddss�ifys;3.. tr==y_ ±;::s S ,_s PO S'ri , .S.Cj:p,a•,• F_ ]'k. J;. ..h• .4aQ'-' '"jrs:; •' r..fR t -.'r: Cr` :'., :4:'N �..::,� - �:q: ,•rr�K _r� ]],� f;�::=r..2•" v.r� .5 s;: ;T1'-�' .G 7�_ 'a'}:•`�, I<:#Y"p. t':,I •,;r'�i r:'�} _ �q S :-�. ''iri,.w'.r.-..%F+�.•�: ..45'r:},: ti�i i�I±�1><•ai.'T� '.•P:.} �1::�+` j=bs- q.,. .i�6f`!.. -;'='M,_r. n�f�...:r�3,•]. _ ,•4-;;-,�-:.J.,y �• <k�i �. nth•,��.;:::y!�w}'^ j;'. •.r::�.):•: �-S i' r-.1.,_ � ::tit 7 1�.F _ si.. .h Ts. .F• 1_'- +'l.Yiwi:r'�..� Y1ry:.}:c•i}}'{„i,-L�, � _ rYtis :"k.f,:' T•�ry.i!I L:.,, s4 sr�.•ltih•,5 L. .I•.3 •,+ fir,;.7,:5a:r 4 ^:�. i ,�^,.:.. ',�.,; _ �"'_:-, r ,� - 'IS =,.a XFSIING DRIVE :i1•.tr�-- -r2�Lr y,_x,�'�y2L�kr7:.rJ:•�.,r; 4;'- :1,"}'y,v�"4-,: 1 v' '.ti'`F�ti:y'��r'=i};frti'i}•a:.�-'._�:, �etaM.Yv>fnr� '::�a 7e;t«q:;�:••�:'.-.- v5,; - '7•r. !'r'�+?4fr`•7ku s'r+-A�}.. i,�94'Y>k's.73�:•A:Yi• .rk Lj'k.•{ ..;+:"'i n.: •V.;7r: I r:�''•- " t tE !`i <_;� k;L• �:.." ,� ":��.r•:.;r,�ix7�::y::.?`��'�•;;3•<?i.:': :si=��.��.}r;4.�i•d'}r.°'.nr�.�'.s�:i[�:�_.Y-;�•s4j_15';?�f dr.NTRAl TO BE }•u.` �iti Ie_• i �. y y '4;,, y, J-; 5`.':.�, 4 �• t•�..:•i .F.f.+ Cr .t--. � }ice. f. .7�"ti�,;.:. JS.:r., �� �g �`, l HANDO ED '�.lnw a... 7 Ym._. I v$r 7e•'?w.,(�,Z1: •_J,•i s•�,. �yR'"W..,r' .rwti°mod•,.' •:r..^ - ;.i.�'�-w•:-�.�:.`n�:.{i:..!it{...::•�., ±n;.'Sa.w:w:1 z _ �.r,;,,+•�..[.,t 3. •i,�:::�,-• 1•,;i'~. y ��ti.f�,t��� .�: ��E'r a;,:�,�;,.n ;,;�s^�3i'=-:.ti�ti.r �?" ,szc�� �•�:. [;'p•rr..�ro }s;'s'�:�;r:..rf� f�; y 9�q.f y� ^'.-:r.{.. 'Py:� S ea. ';. rt' 2 F•ar}-"•"•r_F..:"d 4::-J1L.� - �i _ +r�•1.-: k_-ti�e;F e eC ri T�i',�G "`�=�a4xy.r.`:��][ir'.•yi 2•�....4 a'a'>�x °i�. ti;f�'r`•r x�x ^e•r+,rti, e��. r-F C h 4 - ? >:- •.. ;,..�. S5n• ..f-. r._„ _ .�-. 3. r::,S.r..e l:;d f d.: }"- �F1�a`- 7r. 1 AD ENT PROPERTY IISOAPE BUFFER NOT PROVIDED70 CIA 4ER ORR•E AISLE f PROVIDE DRIVE ACCESS713 ENTIRE PROPERTY NDSCAPE BUFFER I REDUIRED FIREAPPARATUS ACCESS TURN RADIUS. r mow. ■ 1 f .JL " .r ri � e 16 WL,■ 14 # n ' eF ti ' �1 1 r IAL j3W 41' 6r S 1+ - i F a �rtv w M � v FI i 1 - i'�- � '� . ; � ,� � � �° � � � �� � `� _: s.�. - _ �fr ., u�. t �. y A, � ;, w,r ' r 'S ` ���' z, �'s ��7 ���9 --.. � � d a � 1 �c�� � _ - �_ �r �, ,. -ter�, v k � �n .���. f v � ,�. y .ks fir. �� A� � ,r } ,1 x F � r y� � _ � r 3' _- _ -.�. .,� �� � � R r z � -a� :,, � � E �j�d: k`"�ev J t �'• � y. jti' J6+rBEh�1Y.1[{-fG0=}i P4SOF6RT'Td T}iE N{4T�' � haA'ii'Srw 371G.f7 +T 1 ❑ i i — —BLDG A a r — __BLDG _�rr�c I I I marrnh.3 RWIIM'?0 I I w ww,cv J� ACR0344SR$FCmm �LEw7- .-- - LoeAros1a I �S V' IL 11 La_61JffR + I f vk'.},1:LF4'ti K r GEEI�It M.-vE0.`?q PRQKM_V--DTHM* -H i7har— SkTF PLAN—NVV T11T9a ii t1M1 AREA,i ti uw ' v f� N p �r iO 101.20 ck a f z 100.97 T41 T 18 _ wTw 12 m See Oetad mis Page 1 .00 �Q 700.70 0 71C a 71C CURB CUT z 01. ` I vi 7W PC \ I 1 .95 7W PC f 101. 1.05 11 PT 100.95 7w PT Now ACMD R/W f 1.40 ]VC PT T•PC 1y PC 3nc �111 � ENTF IN TALL 45 F I r' 9 f01.�5 12� RCP -PC 3 w See Detail r 101.30 Ibis Pogo rYC PT Of. IL for cpl PC--PT Exisitin Water %. J.M r01.811-� � 7w roz av �s 102' 71/% xTaiting ,n .. ---- 0.8SX v...... _ 0.85X � -. 1 2.56 317' somw 'l M.W 44 ft Pdge 1VC _ -/� z:- ,_ _; ,� �, - -- ,.�� '- ,w -.. �, 7� rr�., - _ �, � �,. ""_ ., . �, ^ � ri, r � i� � `L ; s, frJ ,ydj - `'� �" � 6r� :.. � � .� _ — �' � 1' k _ � �' �� _ * 4 � �.� _ � � a a - '. +.� I. r � � � _ - , .. - _ .,,. 4 �r.� � ., y�'I��' �,`a V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Pine 43 West (CR-2024-0003) by CSGQA, located at Southwest Corner of N. Webb Ave. and E. Fairview Ave. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/CR-2024-0003 A. Request: Council Review of the Planning and Zoning Commission's decision for a reduced buffer width from 25ft. to 7ft. adjacent to parking and 10ft. adjacent to the rear of the future single-story building on Pad "A" with a reduced setback of 15ft. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: January 21, 2025 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 21 PROJECT NAME: Pine 43 West (CR-2024-0003) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council bleinbei�'- IIAN � Luke avener,President Liz Strader,Vice President DAHO Brian VVhitlock Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts December 30, 2024 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council CC: City Clerk, City Attorney FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner RE: Pine 43 West—CR-2024-0003 History: On November 21,2024,the Planning&Zoning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit(CUP)(H-2024-0038)for a drive-through establishment within 300-feet of existing residential uses to the west, south, and southeast, and residential zoning district to the south(i.e. R-15) and southeast (i.e. R-40). Approved Use: The drive-through is for a restaurant which is planned in the western-most tenant space of a new 10,100-square foot multi-tenant building on the southern portion of the site on Pad B (see site and landscape plans below). The drive-through was approved for pick-up service only; a menu board and/or speakers was not approved. UDC Requirements: The UDC(Table 11-2B-3)requires a 25-foot wide landscape buffer to residential uses on C-G zoned property sharing a contiguous lot line with a residential use; landscaping is required within the buffer in accord with the standards set forth in UDC 11-313-9C. Because the abutting property to the west contains a multi-family residential use and the subject property consists of one(1)parcel of land,a buffer is required along the entire western boundary of the site. However,the UDC does allow the width of the buffer to be modified by City Council at a public hearing with notice to surrounding property owners; a reduction in the buffer width does not affect building setbacks—all structures are required to be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the district(i.e. 25'),per UDC 11-313-9C.2. Staff is in the process of proposing an amendment to the UDC,which would allow buildings to encroach in the buffer area if consent from the abutting property owner is obtained and if Council grants a reduction to the buffer width. In the interim of a code change,the Director has determined a building can encroach within the required buffer area if Council grants a reduction to the buffer width and a reduced setback and consent from the adjacent property owner is obtained for the reduced buffer and building setback. A letter of support for the reduced buffer width and associated building setback was submitted from the owner of the abutting residential property provided that a privacy fence and increased plantings are completed along the west boundary of the site,which will provide visual and sound buffering to the residential units. Applicant Request: The Applicant requests City Council approval of a reduced buffer width of 7-feet adjacent to parking and 10-feet adjacent to the rear of the future single-story building on Pad A with a reduced building setback of 15-feet. The reason for the request is due to the alignment of N. Webb Ave. along the site's east boundary—it shifts abruptly to the west as it intersects with Fairview Ave. in order to align with the access point on the north side of Fairview,which reduces the width of the northern portion of the parcel by more than half of the southern portion of the parcel. The proposed site layout,with the building along the west boundary,provides an added buffer and screening between the adjacent residences and the parking area. zz i _Z- g EEC; a " H � " ! I w I Z I I CO 1--------------- i O ' 32 ��ws f9� �r dzxo i g I I i ❑O e 9 OO -� O / I / , o m r1 n •• o W M m M u M vs 14 a N � a �g z a w m w a0 O W u a V p e z ZI 3W J W Z a E ohs g5ffiF #gS� as ss e' e• _ Cx: zeggiseRa� 3a Z i n 9 � ll �9N.� � § 9 � § W Z ca I i !Cy q0 63 �a aC"� � Jill� �e I� � ��� I H I l� g0't2 �9W'a9 ES �� d a lg�5 i W• a i W`� a W §, § @E 3F gg M "3a 19 �dds E @@ � 8¢95 x etl milli 4' ba F W a �• E���� 4W �� a��88 tl 9 aR�o� �� � aka ��� a aeel l��ffi'� � �� 4 S 0 k 5g lea W 0 "- Mill wa o 0 HOo ¢W i � ® arcxo W z L a C �N i yyi J ir O to v � i / C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation D RB INVESTMENTS, LLC PINE 43 - WEST 200 W BROAD STREET, BOISE,ID r V•- Ll Ida IF a y � r * Pik& . i J I • I _ _ L _ a 1 • 1 - IL 1 71 1 1 1} ' - •� 1 i � r f 1 r 7 +■ � r ine ounci eview 01 /21 /2025 i _ 1 r �` ' - � •1 llll ■I � 1 - 1 ' r - 200 W BROAD STREET, BOISE,ID D RB INVESTMENTS, LLC PINE 43 - WEST ads % - a P. plow * r '� r ' ■ r - ` - +J f r ter. up-a ,ft - ■ + of ar IF i - - i ■, ` r Ilf ' Im— r • - ibp - - + ti. • � r ■ f f ' f i PAD A RETAIL - - } _ �i~ �# -• F MIXED USE R IL r _ �� 7,800 SF _ • ^� J -b + - • LL 1 tiow!'f a • vq T 1 r b 4'�. ■ dp PARKING- 51 �' — ■ �' LLB , ' a rlr '* lip tit 1 .1� :lImG: 43 �, _ ti w 11 AIL 3 ii i � �` ■ rh 06 fS 4#64t OL x _ PAD B �+ - } _ RETAIL ■ � � r { MIXED USE 6 L 4641hL , L 10,100 SF01. S * •- Or r • I 1 - _ � � ' - y ��� 1 � •ter ' ' + - { ' % f ■ l Ebb.— ilk1 fl } ■ � 1 4{ e i r - - -Olt •+ P od ■ J a I 1 ■ a - - L4 F ' _ soil& 14� fie. J n BE33 DRB INVESTMENTS PINE 43 WEST 4 NOVEMBER, 2024 •••••••••••••■: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■N■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ IN 12 •..•••• ; CD \ ••• ••••••••••• — — — — — — - : FAIRVIEW AVE ••••..••••••• 1 5.0 ' 59.25' 7.00' 17.00' 25.00' 17.00' ; ■ 10.00 - ■ r� IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR • ■ I ■ ■ I IRR- - ■ ■ 0 . 0 ■ 0 12 � \ I - N I I ■ - ■ } ■ ' S.0 59.25' L7001 17.00' 25.00' 17.00' -------- PAD A e - - 10.00' I ■ CIO RETAIL - PAD A MIXED USE RETAIL = 2 \ = _ MIXED USE �� \ � ® 7 , 800 SF 7,800 SF \ ■ ■ ■ I \lam \ � � \ ■ ■ ■ - I ■ ■ ■ O 10 �o ■ \O o \ ■ ■ I � o PARKING. 52 STALLS 1 11 9.00' \ \ ■ ■ CD ■ I ■ ■ 7.00' I ■ ■ - 9 - o PARKING: 43 10 O ■ ♦� R20.00' \ \ - ■ - z/ I I • ., O \\ \ CD 10 PARKING : 52 •.. \ STALLS / / I PAD B •., v 9.00 � ----- ------ - RETAIL ■ g ' MIXED USE ( - 16 10,100 SF �� ' •. �� 1 ; : ----- - ■ O ■ / 17.00' 25.00' ; E. WILSON ST. I' = � I 10 -- o PARKING : 43 LF) STALLS 7 = ••.�� ; / ,� 15 OVERALL SITE PLANj � , � �9.00' I �0 F/ ■ ROT ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ENLARGED PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE 111= 151-011 Scale : 1" = 30'-0" qF 23330/24006 Design Package pg. L01 CSHOA . . 4 " �r.t� •�.� 'ram PS- 414 16 ig ' . -J. T .• '• _ _.- - a '� a� - Fes_ - _ - °'�-1��^ rye_:L •' _ �__�~_ _' � ���. -. ���•�a �-sic '�'y'��` �� r� - - L • 4b ' 11 R IFS `� ��'' ���• __ E .i.010 � ;.�'tj `` 1''y .• 4 •� . D RB INVESTMENTS, LLC PINE 43 - WEST AUGUST 7, 2024 200 W BROAD STREET, BOISE,ID MERIDIAN, ID MATERIAL LEGEND : A-1 WOOD - ROUGH SAWN DOUGLAS FIR, COLOR: STORM SEALANT: 20041 B-1 BLACK BRICK, STACKED BOND C-1 CONCRETE D-1 STONE - ELDORADO STONE, STACKED STONE, COLOR: NANTUCKET E-1 G-1 F-2 F-1 H-1 F-2 E-1 G-1 A-1 G-1 E-1 LONGBOARD SIDING, 6"V GROOVE PROFILE, COLOR: DARK FIR F-1 STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND PEBBLE FINE r .. ... (WHITE) A-1 • - F-2 STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND PEBBLE FINE (DARK GREY) - F-1 KII B-1 --__� -- - G-1 BERRIDGE, STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, ZEE LOCK, ----i - - COLOR: CHARCOAL GRAY -i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -' H-1 ANODIZED ALUMINUM, COLOR: BLACK D-1 F-2 H-1 C-1 = PAD A - EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" (E-1) (H-1) LONGBOARD SIDING, 6"V GROOVE ANODIZED ALUMINUM, PROFILE, COLOR: DARK FIR COLOR: BLACK G-1 E-1 A-1 G-1 B-1 E-1 G-1 A-1 SIGN -- -- -- B-1 1 �� D-1 -..., - - D-1 F-2 H-1 ` H-1 H-1 (D-1) - (B-1) = STONE - ELDORADO STONE, STACKED BLACK BRICK, STACKED BOND C-1 =__ - C 1 STONE, COLOR: NANTUCKET PAD A - NORTH ELEVATION PAD A - SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-091 31/8" = 1'-019 G-1 E-1 G-1 F-1 F-2 F-1 F-2 G-1 (F-2) (F-1) STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND A-1 PEBBLE FINE (DARK GREY) PEBBLE FINE (WHITE) E-1 B-1 D 1 - D-1 -- - F-2 C-1 C-1 (C-1) (A-1) CONCRETE WOOD - ROUGH SAWN DOUGLAS FIR, COLOR: STORM SEALANT: 20041 4 PAD A - WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS COLOR - PAD A 23330 DESIGN CONCEPT I SD53 CSHOAWA . . r R L 7� �'yam �� IZ` Y ► •r,+y�' 'fir ,���,4� �4'� 4 .•' 3 r1k:r�_� .. .p _� � '�,'• _ � ram' :,� -��r .,�'_ � �.��. � •a- and IF INN tPrOgy ir N it it i, •4 1 y .i�f•ti a:H r i *, 4.{. _ t ! T ' , �Z' A _ '"`�- '�:w_=• "�,:may mom now I do hot V. i � D RB INVESTMENTS, LLC PINE 43 - WEST AUGUST 7, 2024 200 W BROAD STREET, BOISE,ID MERIDIAN, ID MATERIAL LEGEND : A-1 WOOD - ROUGH SAWN DOUGLAS FIR, COLOR: STORM SEALANT: 20041 G-1 D-1 E-1 B-1 H-1 D-1 G-1 F-1 D-1 E-1 B-1 H-1 D-1 B-1 BLACK BRICK, STACKED BOND C-1 CONCRETE D-1 STONE - ELDORADO STONE, STACKED STONE, COLOR: NANTUCKET E-1 LONGBOARD SIDING, 6"V GROOVE PROFILE, COLOR: DARK FIR D-1 - §JGN SI Jy JV` A' ; F-1 STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND PEBBLE FINE - -. -_- (WHITE) F-1 G-1 S. --. F-2 STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND PEBBLE FINE - ._ - - (DARK GREY) GN G-1 BERRIDGE, STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, ZEE LOCK, - - COLOR: CHARCOAL GRAY mFl I H-1 ANODIZED ALUMINUM, COLOR: BLACK C-1 PAD B - NORTH ELEVATION - 1/8" = 1'-091 G-1 E-1 H-1 B-1 D-1 G-1 (E-1) (H-1) F-1 D-1 H-1 G-1 LONGBOARD SIDING, 6"V GROOVE ANODIZED ALUMINUM, PROFILE, COLOR: DARK FIR COLOR: BLACK 47 y F C-1 C-1 (D-1) (B-1) STONE - ELDORADO STONE, STACKED BLACK BRICK, STACKED BOND STONE, COLOR: NANTUCKET PAD B - EAST ELEVATION PAD B - WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-011 31/8" = 1'-011 - - F-1 F-2 D-1 H-1 G-1 F-1 D-1 F-1 F-2 G-1 H-1 D-1 (F-2) (F-1) STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND STUCCO: DRYVIT CCP3, FINISH: SAND PEBBLE FINE (DARK GREY) PEBBLE FINE (WHITE) G-1 i D-1 C-1 - - (C-1) (A-1) CONCRETE WOOD - ROUGH SAWN DOUGLAS FIR, COLOR: STORM SEALANT: 20041 4 PAD B - SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" ELEVATIONS COLOR - PAD B 23330 DESIGN CONCEPT I SD54 BE33 RODNEY EVANS+PARTNERS DRB INVESTMENTS PINE 43 WEST 4 NOVEMBER, 2024 LANDSCAPE NOTES: PROJECT INFORMATION 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ALL CONDITIONS WHICH IMPAIR AND/OR PREVENT THE PROPER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS EXECUTION OF THIS WORK, PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 2. NO MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITHOUT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. ALTERNATE TOTAL PROPERTY SIZE= 101,690.11 S.F.-2.33 ACRES MATERIALS OF SIMILAR SIZE AND CHARACTER MAY BE CONSIDERED IF SPECIFIED PLANT MATERIALS CAN NOT BE OBTAINED. ZONING DISTRICT=C-G 3. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH ALL OTHER SITE RELATED DEVELOPMENT DRAWINGS. 4. COORDINATE WORK SCHEDULE AND OBSERVATIONS WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START-UP. LOT IMPROVEMENTS AREA= 101,690.11 S.F. 5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER DETAILS. BUILDING COVERAGE: 17,900 S.F. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN NURSERYMAN STANDARDS FOR TYPE AND SIZE SHOWN. PLANTS WILL BE HARDSCAPE COVERAGE: 56,278.11 S.F. REJECTED IF NOT IN A SOUND AND HEALTHY CONDITION. LANDSCAPE COVERAGE: 27,512 S.F. 7. IN THE EVENT OF A PLANT COUNT DISCREPANCY, PLANT SYMBOLS SHALL OVERRIDE SCHEDULE QUANTITIES AND CALL OUT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED: SYMBOL NUMBERS. 90 STANDARD STALLS 8. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MINIMUM OF 3"DEPTH OF CASCADE COMPOST(2"MINUS)OR APPROVED EQUAL . 0 COMPACT STALLS SUBMIT SAMPLE FOR APPROVAL.PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SHALL BE APPLIED PRIOR TO MULCH INSTALLATION. 4 ADA STALLS 9. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE TOTAL: 94 STALLS OWNER. REPLACE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOUND DEAD OR NOT IN A HEALTHY CONDITION IMMEDIATELY WITH THE SAME SIZE AND SPECIES AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES: 76 10. FINISH GRADES SHALL PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION WITH ADJACENT SURFACES AND ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE CIVIL GRADING PLAN. LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: 11. AMEND EXISTING APPROVED TOPSOIL AT A RATIO OF THREE CUBIC YARDS OF APPROVED COMPOST PER 1000 SQUARE FEET.ROTO-TILL ORGANIC MATTER A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES INTO TOPSOIL. NORTH BOUNDARY LANDSCAPE BUFFER(N. FAIRVIEW AVE./PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL) 12. FERTILIZE ALL TREES AND SHRUBS WITH'AGRIFORM'PLANTING TABLETS. QUANTITY PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 160.6 LIN. FT. 13. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 18"DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. LAWN AREAS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 12"DEPTH OF TOPSOIL. 25 WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIRED SPREAD,COMPACT,AND FINE GRADE TOPSOIL TO A SMOOTH AND UNIFORM GRADE 3"BELOW ADJACENT SURFACES OF PLANTER 25'WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROVIDED F FAIRVIEW AVE. u� BED AREAS, 1-1/2"BELOW ADJACENT SURFACES OF TURF SOD AREAS,AND 1"BELOW ADJACENT SURFACES OF TURF SEED AREAS. 1 TREE PER 35 LIN. FT. 14. REUSE EXISTING TOPSOIL STOCKPILED ON THE SITE. SUPPLEMENT WITH IMPORTED TOPSOIL WHEN QUANTITIES ARE INSUFFICIENT. 1 SHRUB PER 7 LIN. FT. VERIFY SUITABILITY AND CONDITION OF TOPSOIL AS A GROWING MEDIUM. PERFORM SOIL TEST/ANALYSIS AND PROVIDE REQUIRED TREES: 5 ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT AS DETERMINED BY SOIL TESTS. TOPSOIL SHALL BE A LOOSE, FRIABLE,SANDY LOAM, CLEAN AND FREE PROPOSED TREES: 7 OF TOXIC MATERIALS, NOXIOUS WEEDS,WEED SEEDS, ROCKS,GRASS OR OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL AND A HAVE A PH OF 5.5 TO REQUIRED SHRUBS:23 _ FO �0 7.0. IF ONSITE TOPSOIL DOES NOT MEET THESE MINIMUM STANDARDS, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO EITHER: PROPOSED SHRUBS: 93 A) PROVIDE APPROVED IMPORTED TOPSOIL,OR �0 CO C0 O B) IMPROVE ON-SITE TOPSOIL WITH METHODS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 15. IF IMPORTED TOPSOIL FROM OFF-SITE SOURCES IS REQUIRED, ENSURE IT IS FERTILE, FRIABLE, NATURAL LOAM, SURFACE SOIL, EAST BOUNDARY LANDSCAPE BUFFER(W.WEBB WAY/COLLECTOR ROAD) IRR I ' RI ERR REASONABLY FREE OF SUBSOIL,CLAY LUMPS, BRUSH,WEEDS AND OTHER LITTER,AND FREE OF ROOTS, STUMPS,STONES LARGER 497.2 LIN. FT. - m \ THAN 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION,AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS OR TOXIC MATTER HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. 20'WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIRED ''�.:' .y:% �,(• +:*%(:�,",,.".,..'.e:'y�•`• '"' " ' '••" • ' � A OBTAIN TOPSOIL FROM LOCAL SOURCES OR FROM AREAS HAVING SIMILAR SOIL CHARACTERISTICS TO THOSE FOUND ON THE 20'WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROVIDED ,{;��, ` '?::Y'•"'`•'''� `a`� •'.' '' ' Ln - PROJECT SITE. OBTAIN TOPSOIL ONLY FROM NATURALLY,WELL-DRAINED SITES WHERE TOPSOIL OCCURS AT A DEPTH OF NOT 1 TREE PER 35 LIN. FT. LESS THAN 4 INCHES. 1 SHRUB PER 7 LIN. FT. i.*•.. - rcy B) REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES SHALL BE TESTED FOR ACIDITY, FERTILITY,TOXICITY,AND GENERAL TEXTURE BY A RECOGNIZED REQUIRED TREES: 13 COMMERCIAL OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND COPIES OF THE TESTING AGENCY'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE PROPOSED TREES: 13 FURNISHED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BY THE CONTRACTOR. NO TOPSOIL SHALL BE DELIVERED IN A FROZEN OR'::<.,,.,. < �,.... •.�- .:: .;�,:,.• .�,:, _ REQUIRED SHRUBS:63 Ya...: .:... ...... ,;;,,..� ;;� �,•. .••..•�. .` •�,�..'.•.r�,'•:::.Y j;,�., MUDDY CONDITION.ACIDITY/ALKALINITY RANGE-PH.5.5 TO 7.6. •.�'..'. •'t :•3:.,•..,i+': S.:w�tii.. f}{��'� :s°: '-f :s°:/ PROPOSED SHRUBS: 84 k n 16. IMMEDIATELY CLEAN UP ANY TOPSOIL OR OTHER DEBRIS ON THE SITE CREATED FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS AND DISPOSE OF / r.••.�•..:,� I PROPERLY OFF SITE. "DOES NOT INCLUDE DRIVE ENTRY 17. TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN 5-0" FROM THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. RS?� 18. TREES SHALL NOT BE PLANTED WITHIN THE 10' 0"CLEAR ZONE OF ALL STORM DRAIN PIPE,STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES. SOUTH BOUNDARY LANDSCAPE BUFFER(E.WILSON ST./COLLECTOR ROAD) 19. STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES MUST BE PROTECTED FROM ANY AND ALL CONTAMINATION DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND 347.9 LIN. FT. INSTALLATION OF THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 20'WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIRED " ' +: �'�� 20. IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY, NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. 20.5'WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROVIDED 4 1 I I 1 TREE PER 35 LIN. FT. / Y•�,.F .S,•k I } >{: :� TOPSOIL NOTES 1 SHRUB PER 7 LIN. FT. PAD A '' ^�� \ REQUIRED TREES: 9 1. TOPSOIL REQUIREMENTS: ASTM D 5268, PH RANGE OF 5.5 TO 7, FOUR PERCENT ORGANIC MATERIAL MINIMUM, FREE OF STONES 1/2 / RETAIL L - I _ PROPOSED TREES: 10 f� �:' � � INCH OR LARGER IN ANY DIMENSION,AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. ? \ 2. TOPSOIL SOURCE: STRIP EXISTING TOPSOIL FROM ALL AREAS OF THE SITE TO BE DISTURBED. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FERTILE, FRIABLE, REQUIRED SHRUBS:50 - ?` PROPOSED SHRUBS: 180 MIXED USE NATURAL LOAM, SURFACE SOIL, REASONABLY FREE OF SUBSOIL,CLAY LUMPS, BRUSH,WEEDS AND OTHER LITTER,AND FREE OF :;,:.•.;:;; � \ 'DOES NOT INCLUDE DRIVE ENTRY / ,•�;•, �'800 SF ,•� \ \ ROOTS, STUMPS,ORGANIC MATTER LARGER THAN 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION,AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS OR TOXIC MATTER 'lr `:i. HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. TOPSOIL SHALL BE SCREENED TO ACHIEVE THIS REQUIREMENT. 3. REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES SHALL BE TESTED FOR ACIDITY, FERTILITY AND GENERAL TEXTURE BY A RECOGNIZED COMMERCIAL OR WEST LANDSCAPE BUFFER(C-G) / GOVERNMENT AGENCY AND COPIES OF THE TESTING AGENCY'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE 389.5 LIN. FT. �\ ® \ ARCHITECT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TOPSOIL SHALL BE AMENDED TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED PH AND ORGANIC 2 'WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER� \ 5 SC U REQUIRED REQUIREMENTS. RE-TEST TOPSOIL PRIOR TO FINAL COMPLETION TO ENSURE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. NO TOPSOIL SHALL 15 WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROVIDED . ... BE PLACED WHILE IN A FROZEN OR MUDDY CONDITION. 1 PER 35 LIN. FT. 4. PLACE TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THICKNESS AS SCHEDULED. PLACE TOPSOIL DURING DRY WEATHER. PROVIDE'"'"•``"t _ t-•• SHRUBS, LAWN OR OTHER VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER ADDITIONAL IMPORTED TOPSOIL REQUIRED TO BRING SURFACE TO PROPOSED FINISH GRADE,AS REQUIRED. SD SD 6 5. COMPACTED TOPSOIL THICKNESS AT THE FOLLOWING AREAS: REQUIRED TREES: 11 PROPOSED TREES:23 A. LAWN AREAS:9 INCHES MINIMUM OR AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE EVEN GRADES WITH SURROUNDING LAWN AREAS. PROPOSED TREES FOR ALT. COMPLIANCE: 15 B. PLANTER BEDS: 18 INCHES MINIMUM 6. FINE GRADE TOPSOIL TO SMOOTH, EVEN SURFACE WITH LOOSE, UNIFORMLY FINE TEXTURE. REMOVE RIDGES AND FILL DEPRESSIONS, REQUIRED SHRUBS:VARIABLE C • �!':? \ � AS REQUIRED TO MEET FINISH GRADES. FINISH GRADE OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE 2"BELOW FINISH GRADE OF PAVEMENTS AREAS FOR PROPOSED SHRUBS: 127 SOD AND 1"FOR SEED. i;:`;� SS \ \ 7. TOPSOIL STOCKPILE LOCATIONS TO BE COVERED COORDINATE WITH EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. J '•7:r1`t:;;Y?',::;..; � 8. ALL GRAVEL, SUBBASE,AND OTHER IMPORTED FILL MATERIALS OTHER THAN TOPSOIL SHALL ONLY BE STOCKPILED IN PROPOSED >•':•�'-.. `""'" ; :::: IMPERVIOUS AREAS. NO GRAVEL OR ROCK MATERIALS SHALL BE STOCKPILED OR TEMPORARILY PLACED IN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE � ��;;.-'•:: r.;• ;Y 'y' AREAS TO PREVENT LANDSCAPE AREAS FROM BEING CONTAMINATED WITH ROCK MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A ,';,':'•:w' :: <'''''``�''' !/ �, W DETAILED STOCKPILE PLAN TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. k{; WEED ABATEMENT NOTES: r '`�:'.:�•' ': '" �j 1. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED OR HYDROSEEDED SHALL HAVE WEED ABATEMENT OPERATIONS PERFORMED ON THEM PRIOR TO +x•'•' 4'%'�' �.:x' L/ - PLANTING OR HYDROSEEDING. PARKING: 51 r1 ?+ O \ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPRAY ALL EXPOSED WEEDS WITH"ROUND-UP"(CONTACT HERBICIDE)OR APPROVED EQUAL. 3. DO NOT WATER FOR AT LEAST SEVEN 7 DAYS. REMOVE EXPOSED WEEDS FROM THE SITE. STALLS 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL OPERATE THE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR A PERIOD OF FOURTEEN 14 DAYS. AT CONCLUSION OF h.: \ S THIS WATERING PERIOD, DISCONTINUE WATERING FOR THREE TO FIVE(3-5) DAYS. `'>'•' ��"``'`'`" 5. APPLY SECOND APPLICATION OF"ROUND-UP"TO ALL EXPOSED WEEDS. APPLY IN STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS. DO NOT WATER FOR AT LEAST SEVEN 7 DAYS. REMOVE WEEDS FROM THE SITE. 6. IF ANY EVIDENCE OF WEED GERMINATION EXISTS AFTER TWO 2 APPLICATIONS,CONTRACTOR SHALL BE DIRECTED TO PERFORM A . •:sr<'=,��:s;�'<,:•. � \ \ THIRD APPLICATION. ��...�• :• •.•;;:::�::k�;,:::. =r:• � 7. AT THE TIME OF PLANTING AND HYDROSEEDING,ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE WEED FREE. IRRIGATION NOTES: 3''Y ='```4S' `•''`4S'= 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL HAVE AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHICH INSURES COMPLETE COVERAGE ::#:•:�."'•�;i:: `' '�'`'• <'. \ AND PROPERLY ZONED FOR REQUIRED WATER USES. EACH HYDROZONE IS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL ;<: <<:<;• .<k'' _ _ _ _ �.. .. STATIONS. PARKING: 43 "x-+ ;�\; \ 2. PLANTER BEDS AND LAWN AREAS ARE TO HAVE SEPARATE HYDRO-ZONES. �•:�; �:�i•`u'?•:-!•�� 3. POP-UP SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RISER HEIGHT OF 4 INCHES AT LAWN AREAS AND 18"AT PLANTER BEDS. 4. PLANTER BEDS ARE TO HAVE DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM OR POP-UP SPRAY SYSTEM.ANNUALS, PERENNIALS GROUND COVERS OR STALLS SHRUB MASSINGS SHALL HAVE A POP-UP SPRAY SYSTEM. 5. ELECTRONIC WATER DISTRIBUTION/TIMING CONTROLLERS ARE TO BE PROVIDED. MINIMUM CONTROLLER REQUIREMENTS ARE AS r:r:•:;• �::4:='tisi.:.^..• �•a:'? ifi '''ks i \ FOLLOWS: ::..••.,:.� ENTE ... ® ® ,., `^ :. a. PRECISE INDIVIDUAL STATION TIMING b. RUN TIME CAPABILITIES FOR EXTREMES IN PRECIPITATION RATES KA AT LEAST ONE PROGRAM FOR EACH HYDROZONE • :.::•• F��'� t�� d. SUFFICIENT MULTIPLE CYCLES TO AVOID WATER RUN-OFF z-07"`•" '':+�: S e. POWER FAILURE BACKUP FOR ALL PROGRAMED INDIVIDUAL VALVED WATERING STATIONS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED ,y x""� "''`"�`' 12•, TO PROVIDE WATER TO RESPECTIVE HYDRO-ZONES. '•,),. - - �� ram- :y�,YZ f�.. •'t. } 6. INDIVIDUAL VALVED WATERING STATIONS WILL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO PROVIDE WATER TO RESPECTIVE HYDRO-ZONES. 7. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE 100% HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE WITH TRIANGULAR SPACING. :f 1 8. SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO REDUCE OVERSPRAY ONTO IMPERVIOUS SURFACES(BUILDINGS, SIDEWALKS, i"`'t-: / »• DRIVEWAYS,AND ASPHALT AREAS). pqp g ] \ 'i:' 9. PROVIDE MINIMUM (1)QUICK COUPLER VALVE PER EACH (6)AUTOMATIC VALVE ZONES. APPROVE Q.C.V. LOCATIONS WITH \ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. <:;' 0 RETAIL MIXED USE 0 ,10100 SF " cnn 01 {y. 5<•:• wek: ,:ti ,y 1 .:+. .r<. .r<. .r<. .:+. .:+. :i+:% :ei+:% :;p.':'• .�. .�. .f. .�. .r;< .f.. :iF?� :iF?� :iF;�%' ::iF?• :•iF?• :•ii?• :i#.�• :'1F?• :t'r:�% ':l'e.��.. :vl#: t:•.G`.L..,�:•.tr'`.L.. �..t: h.. ,,..•S. ,:+...6. ,:+...6,. ,:!...6,. .:!...6,. .:!...6,. ,:!...6,. .: :i`:i4,. ,�+:i`:3.. ,�:L:..,. ,:!:i�:..,. ,:.:ii.... ,r�::1..,. ,•ii.. .•:i.., .•:Lb, ,•:ib, ,•:y4, ;,2;iLs. +':L6, , .•:L6, •::•6 •::•6 ,••::b, i'ai, .•::•+i, .. ......•..:• .... :.� u u �.u... t.u... '#:.:,i•• .:p:,,"••• ,:#s.:u"•:r :#s:a,"•- :#s:a,"•- :#s:a,"•- :#-::u'r :✓::u" :�::ai'^ :✓::4" .�%G:' .✓::4•...... ::4,.,•...;.y1,{.:4•.;. ;.y1,{.:4,.,.. ;.ti{.:4,.,.. ;.`{.:L.,.. :.`;.:yi r. ,`;.'41, ::4:} ;.:4,'.�j I I o00 P� OF ❑oo o00 PREND11,, o 0 - OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN �`Fo 11/04/24 000000 o a�❑❑ o0 0 0000 Scale : 1" = 30'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN ffeA� 23330/24006 uc%)ign Package pg. L01 I? I I BE33 JL:I P RODNEY EVANS+PARTNERS DRB INVESTMENTS PINE 43 WEST 4 NOVEMBER, 2024 PLANT SCHEDULE PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME PLANTING SIZE MATURITY SIZE CLASS SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME PLANTING SIZE MATURITY SIZE CLASS CONIFEROUS TREES PERENNIALS Shalimar Deodar Cedar 41 Black Scallop Carpet Bugle 1 gal. 0.5'H x 2'W 50 Cedrus deodara'Shalimar' 6' Ht. 15' H x 12' W Ajuga reptans 'Black Scallop' + 32 Stella de Oro Daylily 1 gal. 2'H x 2'W Columnar Norway Spruce Hemerocallis x'Stella de Oro' 011 Picea abies 'Cupressina' 6' Ht. 25'H x 6'W f Palace Purple Crevice Alumroot �V,(' 6 Heuchera micrantha'Palace Purple' 1 gal. 1'H x 2 W Iseli Spruce Fastigiate Blue S Munstead English Lavender c 1 g p 6' Ht. 30 H x 10'W + 4 Lavandula an ustifolia'Munstead' 2 gal. 1.5 H x 1.5 W Picea pungens glauca'Iseli Fastigiate' g 25 Dark Towers Beardtongue 1 gal. 3'H x 2'W • Penstemon x'Dark Towers' DECIDUOUS TREES Goldsturm Black-Eyed Susan 78 1 gal. 2'H x 2'W Rudbeckia fulgida sullivantii 'Goldsturm' Flame Amur Maple + 1 Acer ginnala'Flame' 2" Cal. B&B 20'H x 20'W Class 1 O 76 Purpleicious Spike Speedwell 1 gal. 1.5'H x 1.5'W Veronica spicata'Purpleicious' Armstrong Red Maple SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES 02 Acer rubrum 'Armstrong' 2" Cal. B&B 45�H x 15'W Class II GROUND COVERS 10,758 sf RTF Sod • 7 Shademaster Honeylocust 2" Cal. B&B 45'H x 35'W Class II Rhizomatous Tall Fescue Gleditsia triacanthos 'Shademaster' FAIRVIEW AVE. MULCH Street Keeper® Honey Locust Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'braves' 114 sf 3" Depth over Topsoil as specified • 13 2" Cal. B&B 40'H x 25'W Class II Aztec Pebble ....;.... ,,...;.... CO = FO 0 !:~;'` : ` 16,640 sf 3" Depth over Topsoil as specified FO `'`"� Cascade Bark Mulch C CO CO CO CO Exclamation!T" London Plane Tree 6 Platanus x acerifolia'Morton Circle' 2" Cal. B&B 55'H x 35'W Class III IRR Q PH RR R IRR p 10 11 10 8 10 I Crimson Spire Oak WW 0 4 2" Ca M l. B&B 45'H x 15'W Class 11 :'•::•Y Y. 1 Quercus robur x alba'Crimschmidt'TM '° 3 Redmond American Linden 13 2" Cal. B&B 35'H x 25'W Class I ''•' .:.: ::• 6 3 v7 — Tilia americana x euchlora'Redmond' 'r � �t,.� Satin Shadow® Linden •:�:;: •':� " `:.:� ': ::.: ': ::.. �,". O 1 2 Cal. B&B 35'H x 20'W Class 11 ' Tilia tomentosa'Shashazam' ', ;• •.` .`, v a �n I Musashino Japanese Zelkova 6 Zelkova serrata'Musashino' 2" Cal. B&B 45' H x 15' W Class II / 1 �n ;. P] FLOWERING TREES .j Red Barron Crabs pple 2" Cal. B&B 18'H x8'W Class 1 LANDSCAPE LEGEND 3 ') Malus x Red Barron PAD A + 6 Royal Raindrops Crabapple 2" Cal. B&B 20'H x 15 W Class I Malus x'Royal Raindrops' + + PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED RETAIL 4 • SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME PLANTING SIZE MATURITY SIZE NOTES MIXEDUSE j v — — CUT EDGE AS DETAILED SHRUBS — — PROPERTY LINE(VERIFY) 7�$00 S F \ XXXX Helmond Pillar Japanese Barberry z, ,t' 2 2 gal. 3'H x 2'W LANDSCAPE BUFFER •.:: ;:='•�,� Berberis thunbergii 'Helmond Pillar' Wee Willie Korean Boxwood PROPOSED 6'-0'TALL VINYL FENCE, 207 Buxus sinica insularis 'Wee Willie' 2 gal. 2 H X 2 W �����������— COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER.SEE DETAIL 4/1-02 (n Green Velvet Boxwood\ 84 2 gal. 3 H x 3 W O •:•:,:.. .•��.,� '���.� •;� � \ Buxus x'Green Velvet' :•`'" 'aiy Columnar Alder Buckthorn FQCI QUANTITY PLANT IDENTIFICATION KEY g 2 gal. 12' H x 3' W Fran ula alnus Columnaris ,p G 4 Blue Rug Juniper 3 2 gal. 0.5 H x 6'W •Y::•.•• E .,.; , Juniperus horizontalis Wiltonii CALLOUT NUMBERS REFERTO NUMBERED Creeping Oregon Grape CALLOUT NOTES # NOTES BELOW 2 4 Mahonia repens 2 gal. 2 H x 3 W . '• '' :�.:, \ � 1. VISION TRIANGLE •; '`:';. L04 \\ !` Red Tip Photinia 2. PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE :'#�:. �.:*• \ 24 2gal. 8'Hx6'W . ::�•: '••�' �. .•a �"�'= ���111 Photinia x fraseri 3. PROPOSED TURF AREA 4. PROPOSED CONCRETE CUT OUT WITH AZTEC PEBBLE .•"'��'::��;•::' s Dart's Gold Ninebark 2 2 gal. 5'H x 5'W FOR OWNER PROVIDED DECORATIVE POTS AND •;:: 4 4 �:` "-o• \ Physocarpus opulifolius 'Dart's Gold' ,•;�,..,.• :i;..•::�• :�;: :o• :, � �Gj ANNUAL PLANTINGS. 5 - OBE 45 gal. 8 H x 8 W �,, :: ;;::�• Q `.•�, Diabolo Ninebark PROPOSED 6'0"TALL VINYL FENCE COLOR T ;:,;;�•.. w ,.,:,�;.� : `•e;�,, .-�,^ s Physocarpus opulifolius 'Monlo'TM 2 a DETERMINED BY OWNER,SEE DETAIL 6/1-04. Ys. .^ •:b;'•. 6. PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO W. FAIRVIEW AVENUE •` ' ��''�� �' ='� \ Bird's Nest Spruce FRONTAGE 5 2 gal. 4'H x 5'W ••:•Y Y ' ;.� :::: .;.•: p'pi \ Picea abies Nidiformis 7. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO ADJACENT �•,•��: �, ' Otto Luyken English Laurel � � � :tee•,;:• S\ APARTMENT COMPLEX :' .�' :•::.li ' �. ►Q: s �O + 13 2 gal. 4'H x 4'W 8. PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN Prunus Iaurocerasus Otto Luyken i� : : '�'•`��M� <: :: <; ` 9. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING STORMWATER Fine Line Fern Leaf Buckthorn 26 AND/OR IRRIGATION STRUCTURE. NO TREES TO BE is -• •;:��-•'•'•` �::' � � '':'. ..� \ 0 2 gal. 6�H x 3�W Rhamnus frangula'Ron Williams' PLANTED WITHIN 10'-0"OF STRUCTURE P.J.M. Compact Rhododendron 10. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK � " :.�A>>, / \ 2 Rhododendron x'P.J.M. Compacts' 2 gal. 4 H x 4 W 11. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING TRANSFORMER �' \ S Black Lace® Elderberry 2 PARKING : 51 ��, g ; s\ 2 Sambucus nigraEva 2gal. 8'Hx8'W '.a, 3 \ � � STALLS \ 25 Goldmound Spires 2 gal. 3'H x 4'W :b Spiraea japonica'Gold mound' 3 Wings of Fire Wiegela 2 gal 5'H x 5'W • .p L04 : 10 �' Weigela florida'Wings of Fire' ;►j'.. :::i .° : g`• , . ,.:.• .;:s •: •Y '.'. '': Y.•:,�� ORNAMENTAL GRASSES �,'.� = Blonde Ambition Blue Grams �oop000000pZoo is'�Y� " r,. F Op0 MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L02 �:b: / 52 1 gal. 3'H x 3'W o� ' a',.. t,,. Bouteloua gracilis Blonde Ambition p•.` MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L03 e =`� �. °' J "• •��°' JvUUG Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass *', o � : ,►: c 38 1 gal. 6'Hx2'W Calamagrostis x acutiflora Karl Foerster Ice Dance Japanese Sedge _ 81 Carex morrowii 'Ice Dance' 1 gal. 2'H x 3 W �\F L 11/04/24 J' �o0 LANDSCAPE PLAN - AREA ONE 21 Mexican Feather Grass 1 gal. 2'H x 3'W Nassella tenuissima 0000 VL)SC 000��oo 6 Dwarf Fountain Grass 1 gal. 2'H x 2'W • Pennisetum alopecuroides'Hameln' Scale : 1" = 20'-0" Blue Moor Grass g LANDSCAPE PLAN e 2 Sesleria caerulea 1 al. 1 'H x 3'W �� 23330/24006 uc%)ign Package pg. L02 Z:\_REP Projects\2024\24006 Pine 43 West Retail - CSHQA\CAD\Sheets\24006_Landscape CUP.dwg, 11 /4/2024 3:20:15 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 ■ 1EP RODNEY EVANS+PARTNERS DRB INVESTMENTS PINE 43 WEST 4 NOVEMBER, 2024 PLANT SCHEDULE PLANT SCHEDULE PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME PLANTING SIZE MATURITY SIZE CLASS SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME PLANTING SIZE MATURITY SIZE CLASS SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME PLANTING SIZE MATURITY SIZE CLASS CONIFEROUS TREES FLOWERING TREES ORNAMENTAL GRASSES Blonde Ambition Blue Grama + 5 Shalimar Cedar 6' Ht. 15' H x 12' W 1 Red Barron Crabapple 2" Cal. B&B 18'H x 8'W Class 1 52 4, Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' 1 gal. 3'H x 3'W Cedrus deDodosodara Shalimar Malus x Red Barron ��3uu&c Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 38 1 gal. 6'H x 2'W � Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Columnar Norway Spruce 6' Ht. 25'H x 6'W Royal Raindrops Crabapple 11 Picea abies 'Cupressina' + 6 Malus x'Royal Raindrops' 2" Cal. B&B 20'H x 15'W Class I _`""' 81 Ice Dance Japanese Sedge 1 gal. 2'H x 3'W ,lu Carex morrowii 'lce Dance' 0 Iseli Fastigiate Blue Spruce 21 Mexican Feather Grass 1 gal. 2'H x 3'W 0 1 Picea pungens glauca 'Iseli Fastigiate' 6' Ht. 30'H x 10'W SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME PLANTING SIZE MATURITY SIZE NOTES Nassellatenuissima 6 Dwarf Fountain Grass 1 gal. 2'H x 2'W SHRUBS •- Pennisetum alopecu roides 'Hameln' DECIDUOUS TREES Helmond Pillar Japanese Barberry 1 Blue Moor Grass 2 Berberis thunbergii 'Helmond Pillar' 2 gal. 3'H x 2'W �c 2 Sesleria caerulea 1 gal. 1 'H x 3'W + 1 Flame Amur Maple Acer ginnala'Flame' 2" Cal. B&B 20'H x 20'W Class I O 207 Wee Willie Korean Boxwood'W 2 gal. 2'H x 2'W Buxus sinica insularisee Willie' PERENNIALS 84 Green Velvet Boxwood 2 gal. 3'H x 3'W O 41 Black Scallop Carpet Bugle 1 gal. 0.5'H x 2'W Armstrong Red Maple0 Buxus x'Green Velvet' Ajuga reptans 'Black Scallop' 2 Acer rubrum 'Armstrong' 2" Cal. B&B 45'H x 15'W Class II 1,0-- Columnar Alder Buckthorn Stella de Oro Daylily -0 11 Frangula anus 'Columnaris' 2 gal. 12' H x 3' W � + 1 32 Hemerocallis x'Stella de Oro' 1 gal. 2'H x 2'W 0 Blue Rug Juniper Palace Purple Crevice Alumroot Shademaster Honeylocust 3 Juniperus horizontal is 'Wilton i i' 2 gal. 0.5'H x 6'W + 6 Heuchera m icrantha'Palace Purple' 1 gal. 1 'H x 2'W 7 2" Cal. B&B 45'H x 35'W Class II 0• � Gleditsia triacanthos 'Shad emaster' Creeping Oregon Grape Munstead English Lavender Z/ 0 1 4 Mahonia repens 2 gal. 2'H x 3'W 4 Lavandula angustifolia'Munstead' 2 gal. 1.5'H x 1.5'W f Red Tip Photinia Dark Towers Beardtongue Street Keeper® Honey Locust � 24 2 gal. 8'H x 6'W • 25 1 gal. 3'H x 2'W Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'braves' • 13 2" Cal. B&B 40'H x 25'W Class II Photinia x fraseri Penstemon x'Dark Towers' Dart's Gold Ninebark Goldsturm Black-Eyed Susan + 2 Physocarpus opulifolius 'Dart's Gold' 2 gal' 5'H x 5'W 78 Rudbeckia fulgida sullivantii 'Goldsturm' 1 gal. 2'H x 2'W Exclamation!T" London Plane Tree Diabolo Ninebark Purpleicious Spike Speedwell 6 Platanus x acerifolia'Morton Circle' 2" Cal. B&B 55'H x 35'W Class III 45 Physocarpus opulifolius 'Monlo'TM 2 gal' 8'H x 8'W 76 0 Veronica spicata'Purpleicious' 1 gal. 1.5'H x 1.5'W 5 Bird's Nest Spruce 2 gal. 4'H x 5'W Crimson Spire Oak0 Picea abies 'Nidiformis' SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES 0 4 Quercus robur x alba'Crimschmidt'TM 2" Cal. B&B 45'H x 15'W Class II ,/\, Otto Luyken English Laurel 13 Prunus Iaurocerasus 'Otto Luyken' 2 gal. 4'H x 4'W GROUND COVERS Fine Line Fern Leaf Buckthorn 10,758 sf RTF Sod ___ 13 2" Cal. B&B 35'H x 25'W Class I Rhamnus frangula'Ron Williams' Redmond American Linden G 26 • Tilia americana x euchlora'Redmond' P.J.M. Compact Rhododendron 2 Rhododendron x 'P.J.M. Compacta' 2 gal. 4'H x 4'W MULCH Satin Shadow® Linden Black Lace® Elderberry 114 sf 3" Depth over Topsoil as specified O 1 Tilia tomentosa'Shashazam' 2" Cal. B&B 35'H x 20'W Class 11 O 2 Sambucus nigra'Eva' 2 gal. 8'H x 8'W Aztec Pebble Goldmound Spirea !' ;' ' ''' '�'.' 16,640 sf 3" Depth over Topsoil as specified 25 Spiraea japonica'Goldmound' 2 gal. 3'H x 4'W Cascade Bark Mulch 6 Musashino Japanese Zelkova 2" Cal. B&B 45' H x 15' W Class 11 /��1 Wings of Fire Wiegela + Zelkova serrata'Musashino 3 Weigela florida 'Wings of Fire' 2 gal' 5'H x 5'W MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L02 �f' ' ` A\ b.. MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L03 ���� 1 LANDSCAPE LEGEND 0 PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED '�, ii�✓ (`ram - - - - - � PARKING : 43 4 ►;::1 f�l 104 L04 c• • CUT EDGE AS DETAILED STALLS �.: f. - - •��'•�•°"' �' •� �� � /„ PROPERTY LINE(VERIFY) �''` 10 vlj • •� �1''• ,'� �•' '�� LANDSCAPE BUFFER .ate' ""°:� •� ® Irv ��� ' '`' PROPOSED 6'-0'TALL VINYL FENCE, — E NTE Gfi —.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—— COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY ��'"�. ,+i.:� --r ;�; ;�.a„ .,�.�e';�.�;• �"^ �� OWNER. SEE DETAIL 4/1-02 .._:• 1 :4: c ,S" S FQC1 QUANTITY 7 . :::: 3 «' S PLANT IDENTIFICATION KEY 4 4 4 4 �.:::.�':�.. '. ��;, :y^;' s�� J _ '• •';\ ° '' '%' '� CALLOUT NUMBERS REFER TO NUMBERED CALLOUT NOTES NOTES BELOW :•.e . • / � 1. VISION TRIANGLE .� , 2. PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE 3. PROPOSED TURF AREA 4. PROPOSED CONCRETE CUT OUT WITH AZTEC PEBBLE �•�:: a• 1 (r� PAD B 4 '�•�I' I •• FOR OWNER PROVIDED DECORATIVE POTS AND _ 1 O l \ ANNUAL PLANTINGS. �'�.•`• I RETAIL 3 5. PROPOSED 6'-0"TALL VINYL FENCE, COLOR TO BE :.`': DETERMINED BY OWNER, SEE DETAIL 6/1-04. ••'••, .'� I MIXED USE ••���•�� 1 6. PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO W. FAIRVIEW AVENUE FRONTAGE ;•�:•• I :po.•� �1<.. � i 7. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO ADJACENT 5 ❑ 107100 SF 4 i :' , :*' APARTMENT COMPLEX I - 8. PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN .. 9. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING STORMWATER L--------- ^' :::� �" :°' AND/OR IRRIGATION STRUCTURE. NO TREES TO BE PLANTED WITHIN 10'-0"OF STRUCTURE cn !`.".�= •* - °' `°- �'r'�: ''• n 10. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK 11. RETAIN AND PROTECT EXISTING TRANSFORMER Ir :: •% ..� ... vc o. .• , ': °. ;;....•.. ,c: •::' � .. .�' •. ... ::�:yid:• :i• •ia, •:�:Mi�i• :�•' :j• •iw ::L' :�:::taw 4' .T OF . ..,.. ..,.. .,.. .6 .6 .6 .6. ..:.. ..6. ..:.. ..6. ..:.. ..6. ..:.. ..6. .�:.. ..6. :��:. ..6. ::?:. .•6. ::?:. .•6. ..6. ..1. ..1. ..1. ..1. ..l•. ..l•. ..1. ..l•. ..4•. ..1':;e��%^.. ..l:,e::'. "::1':ae'..;.. ..t.a�� • • • Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. Y.. •y.. .:I.:'.'. :•Y.:'!a..Y.... •'Y.:'!•'.•Y,• .Y.:'!a..Y.. .Y.:'!•'.•Y,• •Y.:'!•'.•Y,• .Y.:'.'.••.'... .Y.:' ..Y.:'.'.•.• .•Y. �..�. ....\..�. .... ....\.. .11...I:.:.. ...I:.:....11...I:.......11...I:.......11...I:.:....11 I. :... 1 I:.:.. 1 •.I:.. 11•..I: .11...I .....11' .I. ...11 I. :... .I:.:. ..I:.:....I ...I:.:....I ...I:.:... ..I..:... ..I..:... ..I!.:. ..I:, •.I. I. .I. I... I:.:. ..I:. IL 0000�oa0000�0000 — E. WILSON ST. � — �o°ooc�> PREIO�, So°O°o oJFD �11/04/24 �°°° LANDSCAPE PLAN - AREA TWO 0° voo��°O0 a�000000 0 000 Scale : 1" = 20'-0" LANDSCAPE PLAN 40 23330/24006 uc%)ign Package pg. L03 Z:\_REP Projects\2024\24006 Pine 43 West Retail - CSHQA\CAD\Sheets\24006_Landscape CUP.dwg, 11 /4/2024 3:20:23 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 5 A R I I E3 ■ �,� Ip RODNEY EVANS+PARTNERS D R B INVESTMENTS PINE 43 WEST 4 N O V E M B E R, 2024 3"DEPTH OF MULCH AT PLANTER BEDS ROOT FLARE TO BE AT SOIL LINE. PREVAILING WIND DIRECTION I I I II 1111 Mill I II -1 III III 1 1 . 1 I II II APPROVED TOPSOIL AND SOIL REMOVE DEAD/DAMAGED BRANCHES AND AMENDMENTS AS SPECIFIED SOIL LINE PRUNE TO INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF FINISH GRADE, =1 - ARBORICULTURE STANDARDS; IMPROPERLY PER PLANS PRUNED TREES(AS DETERMINED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT)SHALL BE REMOVED PLANTER BED CUT EDGE e AND REPLACED. DO NOT REMOVE MAIN 2 a, � LEADER!! (TYPICAL AT TREES IN TURF AREAS) NOT TO SCALE RUBBER CINCH TIE 2"x 2"WOOD STAKE(LENGTH AS • REQUIRED)-DO NOT PENETRATE ROOTBALL. d a SEE NOTE 1. SET STAKES PARALLEL TO d . PREVAILING WIND. 'A' 'A' 0 'off A-LENGTH,AS SPECIFIED CONSTRUCT 2"EARTH BERM AT EDGE OF C OR PER PLANT SCHEDULE o ROOTBALL, FILL TREE RING W/MULCH,AS pp oo ° SPECIFIED. 9- Q' B=85%OF'A' ^ 3"THICK MULCH LAYER, KEEP MULCH 3"AWAY + o �� • FROM TRUNK. 0 PLAN VIEW FINISH GRADE PER PLANS •; a p FINISH GRADE GROUNDCOVER PLANTING PER PLANTING PLAN w w / MULCH, PER PLANS,3"DEPTH OVER ENTIRE BED. DO NOT COVER CROWNS OF PLANTS \/ COMMERCIAL SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER 0 TABLETS °°��iit��,�g► Mot TILL SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 12", BACKFILL WITH II I . -III 11�►'.�6+ �a`rp° a APPROVED TOPSOIL AND SOIL AMENDMENTS,AS I' SIDES OF HOLE ROUGH&UNEVEN bb SPECIFIED. ///AA%/�� /%/AA%/A /� BACKFILL WITH APPROVED TOPSOIL AND iv �j/ SUBGRADE WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH WIDT WIDTH SOIL AMENDMENTS , SPECIFIED. l 111- OF BALL OF BALL OF BALL OF BALL OF BALL BACKFILL IN 6"LIFTS,WATER EACH LAYER, /j/j///\//\//\�/\///\�/j�//\�//\\///\\//j/ 5' MIN. DIA. TAMP LIGHTLY AS REQUIRED, BACKFILL TREE RING SOIL EVEN W/TOP OF ROOTBALL, DO NOT OVER COMPACT!! SET ROOTBALL ON NATIVE, UNDISTURBED �'- SECTION SOIL NOTES: NOTES: 1. REMOVE BURLAP,TWINE,AND WIRE BASKET FROM TOP 3/3 OF ROOTBALL. REMOVE ALL NAILS,TIES,AND PLASTIC FROM ROOTBALL. IF SYNTHETIC BURLAP IS UTILIZED TO WRAP THE ROOTBALL, IT SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED. ONLY 1. ALL GROUNDCOVER PLANTS TO BE PLANTED ON CENTER AND IN A TRIANGULAR PATTERN. BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP SHALL BE LEFT ON THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOTBALL. 2. APPLY SPECIFIED PRE-EMERGENT PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO ALL GROUNDCOVER 2. THE STAKING OF TREES IS TO BE THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION; HOWEVER,THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE BEDS. THAT ALL TREES ARE PLANTED STRAIGHT AND THAT THEY REMAIN STRAIGHT FOR LENGTH OF WARRANTY PERIOD OR 1 YEAR AFTER SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION WHICHEVER IS GREATER. ALL STAKING SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. GROUNDCOVER O U N D C OV E R / PERENNIAL 3. IN THE EVENT OF A QUESTION OR LACK OF CLARITY ON THE DRAWINGS,THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE 3 ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING. PLANTING 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT NOT TO SCALE MATERIAL. 5. WRAP RUBBER CINCH TIES AROUND THE TREE TRUNKS AND STAKES USING EITHER THE STANDARD OR FIGURE EIGHT TYING METHOD. SECURE THE TIES TO THE STAKES WITH GALVANIZED NAILS TO PREVENT SLIPPAGE. 6. WATER TREE TWICE WITHIN THE FIRST 24 HOURS. ROOT FLARE TO BEAT SOIL LINE 7. IN THE EVENT HARDPAN SOILS PREVENT TREE PLANTING AS DETAILED, NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. PREVAILING WIND DIRECTION CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING 5 NOT TO SCALE SOIL LINE G REMOVE DEAD/DAMAGED BRANCHES AND PRUNE TO INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE STANDARDS; IMPROPERLY PRUNED TREES(AS DETERMINED BY THE \ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT)SHALL BE REMOVED EXTRUDED POST CAP 96" ON CENTER AND REPLACED. DO NOT REMOVE MAIN (STANDARD OPTION) 91" MAXIMUM SPAN LEADER!! N RUBBER CINCH TIE K14 \ � 2"x 2"WOOD STAKE(LENGTH AS HOLD TOP AND BOTTOM RAILS REQUIRED)-DO NOT PENETRATE ROOTBALL. 7/8"U-CHANNEL IN PLACE WITH LOCK RING. SEE NOTE 1. SET STAKES PARALLEL TO PREVAILING WIND. REMOVE TOUNGE ON ONE SIDE 12" REMOVE TREE WRAP TRUNK PROTECTION, OF PANEL TO SIT FLUSH 4" 5"31 CONCRETE MOWSTRIP z� AFTER INSTALLATION AGAINST POST a O r CONCRETE FOOTING 7/8"x 6"TOUNGE AND GROOVE cv v CONSTRUCT 2"EARTH BERM AT EDGE OF I v w ROOTBALL, FILL TREE RING W/MULCH,AS PICKET SCORE JOINT AT EACH POST O z SPECIFIED. 1-1/2"x 5-1/2"RAIL w FENCE POST,SET POST PRIOR U < 3"THICK MULCH LAYER, KEEP MULCH 3"AWAY TO INSTALLATION OF MOWSTRIP O FROM TRUNK. 12"WIDE CONCRETE MOWSTRIP PLAN VIEW = FINISH GRADE IL o pw /jam//�////�// // ��V //V//////////�/ COMMERCIAL SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER N 5"SQUARE VINYL FENCE POST TABLETS p w /� ��\ V/V N IL / SIDES OF HOLE ROUGH&UNEVEN SET FINISH GRADE AS ILcn -III - I I III—III— III o -1TI-1TI . II-�1 SPECIFIED REMOVE ANY PLASTIC, BURLAP, NAILS, OR OTHER ~ 1 III BACKFILL WITH APPROVED TOPSOIL AND I IIII • MATERIALS FROM THE ROOTBALL WHICH MAY LIMIT - -III-III -III SOIL AMENDMENTS AS SPECIFIED. 1I11I ° ! CONCRETE FOOTING AS • -'l l I N =III= SPECIFIED • III III BACKFILL IN 6"LIFTS,WATER EACH LAYER, III 11I - 1 1 ROOT GROWTH -��� i i_ I I- • • WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH TAMP LIGHTLY AS REQUIRED, BACKFILL 1111111I II I l • • CONSTRUCT 2"EARTH BERM TO FORM A WATER OF BALL OF BALL OF BALL OF BALL OF BALL SOIL EVEN W/TOP OF ROOTBALL, NOTES: L!_I J -11I- I11 6"AGGREGATE BASE • RETENTION BASIN, FILL BERM WITH MULCH,AS DO NOT OVER COMPACT!! 5' MIN. DIA. 1. REFER TO LAYOUT PLAN FOR MOW STRIP � -11I- COMPACTED SUB-GRADE ll SPECIFIED TREE RING LOCATIONS. II-1 • SET ROOTBALL ON NATIVE, UNDISTURBED 111=11 I I • MULCH, PER PLANS, 3"DEPTH OVER ENTIRE BED. DO SOIL 2. SCORE JOINTS O.C. AT EACH POST. -III IT�11 I I1= NOT COVER CROWNS OF PLANTS 3. INSTALLATION TOO B BE COMPLETED ETED IN 32„ 31„ NOTES: ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S 5 PROVIDE COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER TABLETS AND SPECIFICATIONS. BIOSTIMULANT,AS SPECIFIED, FOR EACH SHRUB 1. REMOVE BURLAP,TWINE,AND WIRE BASKET FROM TOP 2/OF ROOTBALL. REMOVE ALL NAILS,TIES,AND PLASTIC FROM ROOTBALL. IF SYNTHETIC BURLAP IS UTILIZED TO WRAP THE ROOTBALL, IT SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED. ONLY BIODEGRADABLE BURLAP SHALL BE LEFT ON THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOTBALL. VINYL FENCE PANEL BACKFILL WITH APPROVED TOPSOIL AND SOIL 2. THE STAKING OF TREES IS TO BE THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION; HOWEVER,THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE 5 - AMENDMENTS,AS SPECIFIED. BACKFILL IN 6"LIFTS, 11- THAT ALL TREES ARE PLANTED STRAIGHT AND THAT THEY REMAIN STRAIGHT FOR LENGTH OF WARRANTY PERIOD OR 1 YEAR -- - - - - WATER EACH LAYER, DO NOT TAMP OR OVER NOT TO SCALE - = - - COMPACT. AFTER SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION WHICHEVER IS GREATER. ALL STAKING SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF THE =111, 1 1 1 1111 „l 11 WARRANTY PERIOD. 12" WIDTH OF 12" CONSTRUCT 6"MOUND OF TOPSOIL 3. IN THE EVENT OF A QUESTION OR LACK OF CLARITY ON THE DRAWINGS,THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE MIN. ROOTBALL MIN. ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING. 11 OF 'Zb NOTES: 5. WRAP RUBBER CINCH TIDES AROUND T4. LANDSCAPE IS TOIHE FY TREE TRTHEDUNKS SCAPE A DRTECT S STAKES USING EITHER HAND OWNER PIES OR STAONIDARD ON OR FIIIGURE EIGHT TYING o°oOF PLANT 0 �❑P��/O�yo°Oo 1. SHRUB SHALL BEAR SAME RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE AS IT DID IN NURSERY. METHOD. SECURE THE TIES TO THE STAKES WITH GALVANIZED NAILS TO PREVENT SLIPPAGE. �] 2. WATER SHRUB TWICE WITHIN FIRST 24 HOURS. 6. WATER TREE TWICE WITHIN THE FIRST 24 HOURS. 3. THIN BRANCHES AND FOLIAGE BY%3. 7. IN THE EVENT HARDPAN SOILS PREVENT TREE PLANTING AS DETAILED, NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. Pjy�G�• 4. DO NOT CUT LEADERS TO RETAIN NATURAL SHRUB SHAPE. 8. FOR TREES LOCATED WITHIN ROADSIDE PLANTERS LESS THAN 8'-0"IN WIDTH, PROVIDE TREE ROOT BARRIER(DEEPROOT o �o 5. FOR CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS THAT ARE ROOTBOUND,SPLIT THE ROOTBALL WITH 3 EQUAL SPACED #24-2 OR APPROVED EQUAL). LOCATE ROOT BARRIER AT BACK OF CURB AND EDGE OF SIDEWALK. ALL TREE INSTALLATIONS 0000'fF 11/04/24 ',§ VERTICAL CUTS. SHALL CONFORM TO ALL AGENCY APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS,CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. o°oo o Q 0 aD❑ ❑❑o 000 000 SHRUB PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING 1 NOT TO SCALE 4 NOT TO SCALE LANDSCAPE PLAN �� 23330/24006 uc%)ign Package pg. L04 Z:\_REP Projects\2024\24006 Pine 43 West Retail - CSHQA\CAD\Sheets\24006_Landscape CUP.dwg, 11 /4/2024 3:20:33 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3 D RB INVESTMENTS, LLC PINE 43 - WEST 200 W BROAD STREET, BOISE,ID x # MATERIAL LEGEND A. WOOD 1. LONGBOARD SIDING, 6" CHANNEL PROFILE, B. METAL COLOR: LIGHT FIR C. CORRUGATED METAL 2. WESTERN RED CEDAR TIMBER, COLOR: STORM D. CONCRETE SEALANT: 20041 E. STONE 3. STACKED STONE, COLOR: ALDERWOOD F. STUCCO 4. ANODIZED ALUMINUM, COLOR: BLACK 5. NATURAL COLOR 2" CONCRETE SOAP BLOCK, 6,-0„ B 4 C-6 D-8 CONCRETE SOAP BLOCK 6. BERRIDGE 'l CHARCOAL GRAY DECK, SLOPE TO DRAIN I, l T.O. CMU SLOP TO DRAIN (2)#5 CONT. BOND BEAM AT STONE VENEER 7. SW BUNGALOW BEIGE TOP �� OVER METAL _ _ T.O. MU LATH AND GROUT 106'-0" 8. DARK GRAY GROUT TOP COURSE SOLID I BED, RE: SD51 (2)#5 CONT. BOND BEAM AT 2'-0" O.C. E-3 - _ B-4 #6 VERT. BAR @ 16" O.C. 1/2" FIBER EXPANSION JOINT - - 2" 12" 6" CONCRETE SLAB WITH - POST, PAINT BLACK 13 X 13 D5 X D5 W.W.F. I - co 0'-01 tr Xxx"_� T.O. PAVEMENT #5 DOWEL AT 24" O.C. EXTEND N T.O. FINISHED FLOOD 36 BAR DIAMETERS OVER TOP 2„ 100'-0" OF FOOTING, ALTERNATE Cl HOOKS a. GROUT SOLID - _ (2)#5 CONT. - — CONC. FOOTING 12"X 30" 30" d W/(2)#5 HORIZ. do U TRASH ENCLOSURE - WALL SECTION ENCLOSURE FRONT - ELEVATION 1/2" = 1'-011 2 1/2" = 1'-0" D8 o CONCRETE SOAP BLOCK D-8 E-3 CONCRETE SOAP BLOCK cn SLOP TO DRAIN p Lo SLOP TO DRAIN - T.O. CMU — T.O. CMU POST, PAINT BLACK, TYP. - - - --� - - =��_-----•—�-�--=F-- •=—_�_J�—.L--�--`_`'-' - - - - - -- _- - - - r BRANDIR AAA RIBBON RACK HYDRAULIC STEEL BENDING MODEL'RB07"ASTM A53 - y_ — -- WITH A MANDRIL, USED TO SCHEDULE 40 HOT DIPPED GALV. - - INSURE SMOOTH CURVES ON STEEL PIPE (2.375"ODX0.154 ► -k== - �- E 3 - = �--- THE RACK WALL)OR SIMILAR loci 9 5/8" ° 2 3/8" ' - TOP OF SIDEWALK 14Rill k— _� - _ T.O. FINISHED FLOO . - T.O. FINISHED FLOO R -0100' 'R a - a -a M mill 6m #3 REBAR FOR ANCHORS - (2 REQUIRED) LEVEL a CONCRETE FOOTINGS 3ENCLOSURE SIDE - ELEVATION ENCLOSURE REAR - ELEVATION BIKE RACK 1/2" = 1'-011 41/2" = 1'-011 NTS D RB INVESTMENTS, LLC PINE 43 - WEST 200 W BROAD STREET, BOISE,ID - - D-Series Size 1 �[aakl • - . . . . . T03«caEd.E.17hOfOrtMtr.:r.pdrrtt a dDrwtly,d.n�la M,G product rise t;dwna t.iph0/gt D-Ser+•,a•,4 z.,.._�::..:. . . Legacy LED Area Luminaire r""' Aacenorin ND LEGEND Aa ploh tM Dsx1 LFD P7 a0«Gt Dwan.s,•,�md a nt.gleg1 tf25T , l P$Zr r•.•1t6•hMPS.MA,Ned M3 IEGF3D , • • 1 a , 0,yd� 7 Aq7, ,n7a Pi1wdr9uae q.d6RLRr4d.M1 Atogti 3 7M TWe56wotmr.ndmoert w.a e..l,ti wrtl,WMIt --�7�----�;; Dllt1"Ism P1.1aal•T IS(LLw P,M,a1-351tA1e�d(IIM m• a Iaor•.+Iol w•/,1q i ; _ � �� s AAo•d..rp..,rw e..9b.dar"d^txam aaea,rt ::--�! _ 6 XVOLTo6, t&It,,f PI,PS•AA.P9odP11 O.Sk , ® n l atuasscuM n+..•.,ur.wanrmn 7 xra1....e., t,y,6.9..al7n.dww d's;et'ins ® VAMSwtl S,wrrlrP' a XV0.3ror.itL.a�Grg6FdOrirdwrlrlk•TMlHOL1PnfCD(HbnfCS! I.ok .� 7 ° { `- ♦ - ♦ - -> - VA:161PttGt Me,.rrrye,Mtif)IIrP1.P7.n,HWIS. r S.'gkWSRno,w,t?ap77NalENDP.r►rwlDPlwouw+&N.IOVd,IWAVOL1raw.Ldr.t+►.rg3FdCf • • ' ` ( l l / lf� ' ==� I t0 Su9A�b roKro mnud rdn Iwow•Yn 1 S',rid IY drw + WIAIad(tlGl I14,44010M/1MM• 12 ..ov11.t.geSFAoeYbObw•d.wsesgoMadOd.rorb lSGwr•t 1o•dr.[^9p APr(1C1I631 Oir.rel..a.,pA.td1P-s•r' nOlts,ro'r srr►r 11 Buy Am•�c.n pSttM3+0(tlp IYae-uY Yn.H.PT0.111 MI P11'' 7 epv.qAN rout O°Yb.ad•uf..,Y.a+. 1 Aea sr,Yr Wr.rAr SM a•,vy.rw A¢.ev�,Vo+rwd l.r,r.ar 7.37'd.,.,w ti Yw iM Introduction Ftr•Aooemucl 5•••e.,1'"'* w.wJa.Y•M uw.,d.e..d.aMe*[s.edn...MMdie+. w.d.w.ta.r 1.. j ktlwn0,d16.N1° 1.14tb•ddndwer P'1'F2Fd.wr•.ror-•wo.*get A.I 1 T15 - TIM - T25 - - - - TIM The modern styling of the D-Series is striking aTAupr®u Man,w+erWq w6oalp;pw.t un�9„at9a.dYd+vne.,.p,.r1»+.n dnA r,bYe c• ►s••. ., Q �� , a•tlu• tG ItlONr'r.dr+a..�bftfT1 Pr1!1. d/ '-R?l ra.F"11.n.-.r,Ar.M trrd. rro.r rrn Specifications yet unobtrusive-making a bold,progressive osllrrawl•rutict E,.r.ar,,,,,1, 1,oMor,a,,.w,wr,,a..,(,Ee.rR,.nrn,t•rr�K,�,dm�t.cT„T.o EPA: 1.01 fe O statement even as A blends seamlessly with its tI P„udY wSn....e9.mvCD.r6-.dwe ll...ha-Wbw "X.MAS.KRY.P.M*i Par.Ywltl.•'ra 03 won 001a1 _ Fvrw<s,d.psM Yd awr.. 190,9ree.r2 q,.-I-ra•.d ocr 33' IfW performance,high efficacy,brig-life luminaire.environment The D-Series distills the benefits R�-�•r-+ate-t+L= � R•b..ee1A»m Swd MJ+.ngl ae6 r.otq.arn,,.GntoJ9 . , , . • , , , . r , , e , r , . . , r , , Length: of the latest in LED technoloWICa`Jgy into a high a N..,4 *,at.' 13, ,r.,,,r,r,.•a,,,or, - , , ' ' ' ° ' ' ' 23 .*PLC LCCOoaKCOd.-.&I..wAtb a,rpw•r Ynwv°',w Arswd ,*-Yon z.,Not•.•Iri,vb,,,,n,,,,r,„,,,d,,,d1,,,d,•.q Width: 25P-1k,-.r.r b,wmid. PER PM,PEAT,.,<r.5•e CanaCb•or•pk orp,¢a , , - t , . p1Ni L The outstanding photometric performance 25 ra ..at.•.t,a+.Y+ -,�I..rice•.+pt A d.,,�.w Height HT: �n1i,w H H2 results in sites with excellent uniformity,greater lt/2' 7 pole spacing and lower power density.It is O Height H : 61 z -deal for replacing up to 75OW metal halide in Weight I_;S pedestrian and area lighting applications with --- •:} , (,nAA): ypical energy savings of 65%and expected EGS-External Glare Shield , T35 - , TAM - MIN ..a rSVS service life of over 100,000 hours. A- Ordering Inforniation EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA NLTAIR2 PIRHN DDBXD G1 MUD ®©® Tenon Mounting Slipfitter 1 1 O "� , -- • - - 1- - • • - ' HANDHOLEORIENTATION DSXI LED FerwardWles 30K NOR TIS IIM10W TSn *Vivershon` MYOLT' Shlppedind6ded PI Pa' P1' 409 40WR 2APIaTxane) TSS 1pevow. XYDLT SPA ',ep,ae 001e tttptlrng 2.11' FAA I AS1•5190 ASM 210 AS3.S 290 ASMM As).$320 ASM A" Tss - _ - T314 - -11110/$ .KC P2 PS Pd fOK SQQOR T15 T IsIIa1 1277w/10Y1 2.7n' APA As125-190 ASTIS•110 AS72Sd90 AS12S.-M AS125-320 AS12S-M �r YDe 19A 1prvrrtdwn' RPA Kcgnd pok 9q ON, r lift ASTISA90 ASTIS-230 AS735-M0 AS1JS-)90 ASTI$-120 A5115•010 P3 P6 P9 12M im I"dw TSW *Vviltk 120' WSA Wa DWWT Rotatedoptics TIS type IMl BU Battw(WA, 208' SK1316A Squ XkUr+rw5al'Ip Mgadp'N" D 8 PI0 P12 T3M TpeIrA*n LC(D Leftcaon�ao9' 20' RPIIMBA k•sUpOkanner�lrnato•gAdtM' PI1 Pi3 TGM i I/RKdPPn ' )TK RCO RqM cpre[utdt, 277 Shippedseparatelp _ v.:,,..,.'t��.,r p i 2n110 2M% )Y90 3r120 ar90 TF1M Forr•atlem 347' KMM DOMU Ala:am mount rq Vim dpior A r,d(�pnn SdeB S,det6D 5-0etA( SrOe C6D RO Rd Pok Sde t.(GD Inebtrn 480' 15Detty Pndil Hatdhole Orl Noeterdpur Is I DM19AS DALM (M129AS I DMMAS I DM32AS I D1449AS r DSX1 Aran Luminalre-EPA ® Template 08 Top o1 Pole ... .... .„ ' 2�•b'o1b'Pr1e tYPes lCCO PCCO - ShippedNMtlltd PillH4&Krn*W&obvtswA8-'57 Shippedlesuled DDBXD )Arkbaue 61 GeittaDml 0563• . Sitl 3wS 50ld: M" Uk o M01A0e9TTp -iNAD nlgrA7tpa2erad SghA(127. 17 )' f Y +i 6V FIRM NANuSIA mC MRH i4AM,ttWedfirm wrrO 1S•30 X111ED 1011 7025 1945 101E :ex 17a9 PER NEAlrl hynt•Ixk:ecrplad of*(MA ours"k4t ar bm Pinar mAkd OF Doi&W(206.2/0.48M DWHXD "t odnedwMael ask - L90 let,rDtArdOM ODBTXD lev%Tdd+ADrov, FPS EnT-pnn(CFAo+((onnd!ardem7 F1RIFOV rsdLlbaCrtppJalition!WnW8--' 11% Rgnmt*dW DBIBXD InNmdbW ,ep,*l • OyR n9 aMxlt iew tnaaM VA P 1 71 7 71 3 f l s 3' 3 S' Pf A 7 Serf t pn rccgade or F,Ica twk owr^ w1 SOC amen we x or. DHAtxD Tnt�Td naw i+lu '. RPA re r72 2 l;.. I s 3 s• J. I s Sepralrl--' PIRMFOY 4r 1 TlolmrarDwN se6ix TS.)T BAA Buy ArtrrxalN k,rn'r:l r OWWA k.W'Td y,6k 5IUWA 15 }-nr I 1' 1 4 C 1S' a' DA1G 0•I(kAn.r•pmrip/rdalMrf,nr, v:rndgMl�tUobitrtimsOrn11MM Shipped witnaldy RPUMRA Is 1 2.7,a 1 IS' I S' V lS' S' Ikxi6ewthaeeAtntul(atldadnw ✓Ik'� stpMakb)' FAO BS oS (3o4swathrt0-'- EGS r -'.rl/:',•d' DSX1 LED GI DSX1 LED GI ay, Yem Georg L/THON/A one L tnen„way•eonyerP,G.«g1.3oo12•Pt,-* :moo-7os-sERv P37s• I L/THON/A one L.tn,rr,Way•eoryror.,G.org„30012•Pl+one •�oa7ossERv n37s• 1 L/THON/A one L:tn,rr,w con ,30012•Phone•�oa7os-sERv n37e; DSX1 LED GI . • I L/GNT/NG 02011.W2Acuity&and•Lghtm%IncN,ry,ym„ ee It-�11� . L/GNT/NG 07011-WAcu.ty&,rid.Lyhn�gMcPl,.y, r..en d R-011111/22 . L/GNT/NG o2011,W2Acu.ty Starch Lgh"Inc Al,yq�r.,mee Rs.06/111n POW I of t Paip 2 or 0 P.D.3 of 0 COA•AENCIALOUTDOOR --vh'EwCI�..:!��'L�-r;� -.-h'vE1'CI%•.. �'L: Performance Data A A Performance Data Lumen Ambient Temperature(LAT)Multipliers Electrical Load Lumen Output lJ»Nrge lends t9 dete•m-e.ebu,•ls-w.r>,•y,t b saap•YMe,r tr-^p,-a+.r. lrrv+raw,Y•hoar rhotonr.nrc 1nh Dacha-na�,ccaderc•wnh NSaU 1hL79Lk 1M ]!M 20 277 767 w .1. pY 32-p r 0, P1 30 530 S4 0.45 026 0.23 0.19 010 0.12 six a•s raw r 12 JO 700 70 0.59 OSa O30 025 020 OM SOY 50'E 1.03 15% SO 102 P3 30 WA 102 086 Oso 041 039 030 022 ns 457 2 0 2 In 956 2 1 2 120 7AU 2 0 2 Ito 1•C exP +oi PA 30 1250 121 1.06 060 051 046 037 027 US f13 1 0 1 120 9N 2 0 2 129 I 2 2 0 2 ill 3f,C 77-t 1.00 Fawxd Opt.1 T2FA 450 2 0 2 119 1 1 2 129 7,06 2 0 2 130 10Y sort 099 ftkr*R9rped! PS 30 1100 lk 115 061 O.SE Oil 040 OA pS I61 I 0 1 QO 1Q 1 • 2 129 7 S 1 0 7 111 0.% Pb 40 1250 16) 116 079 068 059 047 034 TIM 1 0 2 IK 2 1 2 US 2 0 2 1D Wit !',r 097 1/ a0 t/p0 lt1 1.51 OE6 0/6 066 0.51 Olt 14M 17 1 0 2 117 I • 2 126 I 0 2 AO IFIM MIN 1 0 2 Q1 6.961 1 0 2 lit 7AS1 1 0 2 I31 pR 1A Vic 207 174 0% 017 076 064 ON )• 5)0 n SM M 2 0 0 IN 7 3 0 0 134 7 1 0 0 116 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance P9 60 1250 241 201 110 101 0r9 070 051 US- TSAR 6JAVII f 0 1 I25 7 3 1 1 134 7 ) 3 0 2 136 DY. ., 1.'„r-,!..•r...,.r�+-.r r.,n-d.Ndm.•ro'�d.+. Flo 60 so 106 090 052 0a 00 03) 027 TW 3 0 2 W 71a 3 0 2 133 7 3 3 0 2 13S 2s•C Y.oh„t can. i r�.0001n9r.s or LED tneng reaed pea IESHA LWA048 Yd IK S 1 0 1 98 570 1 a 2 106 t 1 0 2 W a.. -ire+IE" ••_t.tn RK&d0plo Pit 60 700 137 11S 067 060 OS3 042 0.12 IUO 9Q 1 6 2 73 1 0 2 it 1 0 2 11 1e c,F I .LF..,�r• 1 +,wru,.ue 1•nor ow,arnn a ch to w.dsrod nwro•. (k0areago d •:ry hwr. I Fa alw l.roan m,-tw,rrc•.,Lw corn.n l,nary a R90) P12 60 1050 107 174 099 1117 076 060 046 ROW 90 1 0 2 73 1 0 2 it 1 0 2 p IIS 1 0 2 III 2 0 2 127 1.9it 2 0 2 129 vn eo R50 231 193 ti 097 016 067 OB M 2 0 2 III 9a 2 0 2 127 9 2 0 2 119 o• 100 TIM 2 0 2 111 2 0 : lU t90f 2 0 2 Iri 15.O0o 096 IRS : 0 I III 901 1 0 2 127 9,011 1 0 2 in 50.000 092 TWA t 1 0 1 Its I 1 0 2 121 1 0 2 Uf 100.000 085 TM 1 6 2 115 701 2 0 2 124 >t 2 0 2 126 30 700 n 70W IFtM 2 0 2 111 1 0 2 177 9 2 0 2 in 13n 1 0 0 ID f 3 0 0 in 9-W 1 0 0 114 155 ts" 3 0 1 W 9 3 0 1 IR 9,376 3 0 1 IN D.r-,re 11g6E.A Mwtarrl Dw+1 R,npy R,n�a9wn n11 73 3 0 2 122 9 3 0 2 112 9 1 1 0 2 114 �i0n Sat• Ind, 0p.9- 1.ne ime ivrw ISw 17 3 0 2 122 9115 4 0 2 111 9 1 9 0 2 111 MIMI WOW%) RL 1 0 2 97 7 1 1 2 101 7 1 0 2 146 nR a P•W Ou11w1 Do" l,.Wd w 51[ .m 1 r. 5 on 1100 s" 1 0 2 72 S 1 1 2 18 a% 1 0 1 A •PIRIKIVc, 3r(17%) 1w(t00%1 E,+ele trc .cry 1vr im+r KG) S 3t 1 0 2 72 I 1 2 72 5016 1 0 2 A FIRNIFOV Owpw Owen TtS Il 1 2 0 2 114 1 0 3 123 1 I 3 0 3 in Id nr..d°n„nawnsl9r.ev+rd„dr„61oa,...r,dnrd T25 11100 2 0 2 its 1 12 2 • 2 12e 1LM 1 0 I Us VA1 11 J 0 2 114 t 1 1 3 123 1270/ I 0 3 18 T3S It 2 0 2 IRS lisp 1 6 2 123 1 11 2 0 2 IB 13M 11 31 2 0 2 111 VU14 1 0 3 In- I 1 0 3 111 14M lI 2 0 3 111 t 2 0 3 123 I 2 0 3 122 N los0 n lyM1 TFTM It 2 0 2 114 1 2 0 3 123 1 2 0 3 111 IRS 1 W 3 0 1 lit 13 3 0 1 in I 3 0 1 lie NwwnAnwe Oewrllw rt.trtMa6lgr Primary romrd dedte Man tsS 1 1S0 1 0 I Iit 11 3 0 I Q/ 1 1 1 1 110 Tw 1 lit 4 0 Z lit 1 4 • 2 121 Mal 4 0 2 110 FAD Frld.%%AkoaptltdmeentakdY*led Allow tMMwa.ruae mPa+�dn.te4 FAOyre la wot ee•ell wnhoMoo1b06 opt om tlut TSW 1 6 0 3 111 1J9A a 0 3 II) 1 IH A 0 3 119 Iran wWdtoOebn.+dtlwlr,gkd, eMtee`trRa,rrgOrlpna.Qra rwdOeatOyk+dt (ILL 91570 1 0 2 M t0 1 0 2 lol I 0 2 102 E00D 7121 1 0 ) 70 7 n 1 • 3 7S 7 1 0 3 76 Orw.twvrd ndrpe+OndTb50:50 1hr l.an,nenw.odm[weteprpe Oru,t* Rerlaeel W womal•b switched a[ats.Coo r Wo 7121 1 0 3 11 7 1 0 3 7S 7 1 0 3 76 DS 6+,. mryntloe Al .9AP50•SooOnaten Itryeedmdy w+ec down �Alin+more cou e%Ktw Awfatir TIS 1341% 3 0 3 wI 473 1 0 3 116 14 1 1 1 117 12S 1 At9 1 0 2 W 72 1 0 3 116 14,74 3 0 1 )11 I2M 11 1 0 3 107 K4S1 1 0 1 116 1 1 0 1 117 (o#A*w0h uYdYd 1.M4Xl pno4x+ fmA4xEpintarTl-%YDLL&, Ptm 465u6-"k,h on an-,,Pm,6A7 135 1 2 0 2 W M.a% 7 0 2 116 1 0 2 117 MRSaMR7 Inr0lxr pho:ael ntephde 'a dVsl t,0nnopw0tloy aa0,anedoat6AroMt a adraded(wriAroanwd,a,ROAM art upped."4e lme Tim I) 3 0 3 105 /1M 3 0 3 Ill Kill 3 0 3 It/ thY Poo-dr 0•'OY de.rwq wal, 1W 1 105 2 0 3 10S fu 2 0 1 111 1 2 0 I 11S ITA or M000r'unor won'nteprApho:arB FF'd Aho ,&. .,n Foal't(1V wt-tt.- 30 12SO FV 12sw � 1 907 2 0 1 1in 14,40 G 0 1 UI I Y) 1 0 I 112 6.15 e_ffl.4 P11h 5r 15.30 naw6nq lr,r,wu+ndn w6enroa[,wnr ndeve;rd Andy Cookoc WA pnaxrl••.r.lry eva-tc-dnrt opwgorr - ISS 1 9it 3 0 1 112 IS 1 0 1 1)$ IS PI I 0 1 112 TSM 1 %3 A 0 2 112 ISAQ a 0 2 120 IS 4 0 2 122 hktm,rd amPent tgnt uerp wtll9ocp ret0mr Tsw 1 4 0 3 111 1G9N A 0 3 121 IS133 a 0 3 111 ItSI�MIFIN M qa NR riuMM l,r.•wr M nmron trmtr kN Nk d-N wnh rrohcrr vrw ow+-+de s W. rtilh Ar e50GR nlgM AIt;erw,can M p W r.-d and oo,an,ened KC 11 7 1 0 2 t/ 11 1 0 2 95 I 1 0 2 16 phoarlaMwr+k+,ran argon wrOhJr,omntrdtotedKOMFhx ImVepoorw th,(3V61TI.VP RfA 1 0 3 66 1 0 3 11 9f1 1 6 3 12 ROD 1 0 3 K 1 0 3 71 951 1 6 I 72 M 1 0 3 106 IS 11 3 0 3 IIS I I6 3 0 3 116 US 3 0 3 tp IS 3 0 3 Its I 3 0 3 117 TIM t 3 0 3 116 t 3 0 3 114 I l 0 3 116 TIS 1 2 0 3 W IS 3 0 3 IIS I 1 0 1 116 Tut 1 A 1 0 3 W t 3 0 3 111 IS 3 1 3 113 TYt 1 2 0 I *1 1 a96 3 0 3 111 1 1 • 1 1N 30 WO n I= IFTM / 2 0 3 W 1 3 0 3 IIS 1 3 1 3 IK Tin 1 0 0 1 Ill WIN a 0 1 lit 6 0 1 111 TSS IS 1 0 1 Ill a77 4 0 1 119 1 • 1 Ill TSM 1 4 0 2 Ili QS a 0 2 lit I • 2 121 TSW 13,111 4 0 3 110 4 0 3 111 1 6 • 3 in M[ 1 1 0 2 11 1 19 1 0 2 M 1 W 1 • 2 9s RW 960 1 0 3 65 9 1 0 3 1r 9 1 • 3 Tt RN 9K 1 0 3 GS 9,657 1 6 3 A 9710 I 0 3 n �A L/THL7N/A One Lthon.W Con a 3OD12•Phone 1s00-705-SERV(7370;• I DSX1 LEDG1 01 . L/TNGN/A One Lth-.W, Con DSX1 LEDG1 ay. yen,G.o+g, y. yen,G.orga 30012•Phone 1-800.7ossERv p37&• 1 _ L/GHT/NG 02011.W2 Acuity&.rd,Lrphnn%Inc Plnq,'.,re od R•^'�nM L/GHr11VG 02011-W2 Acuity&cards Lr*wS be ARngnnr.s d Rw 007ilm COWAIERCIALCIuTDppR P,g.Ad0 COMIdERCIA_ nrc..-,H Pay.Sd1 CSHOA . . *V. AIF.yam � � t, � �-��. �-. ���y�~+1 _' +. �• � � �. r i .�� y - �- _ 'r a� -s � � _ mr • f V. jp- riJ 16 rt £a iti 31 r f IL 7 - aPL { ram• _ J, •�- - _J 7�, _ ; • f "?+` •- W _ - y .z• � •' _ �F µi!# _ r' r,- R i _ - ?�� �' � ■ L� _ - -,},'i '• � k ,., .. • _ 4 +': t _alb 4 s_ � t .-� ,� !�aF { 'tom •`, t• y "' �J:$' fL' 'Y , f� f - 'Wyse",. �hIT _ - ; tir.•- ��• - _`� . , aF „ ... L• }; •ter_ •, �F TM •.r _ . + - �AL ' � ~ f _ �T ■ le or 1• lY.� +F F fT __ _ CSHOA -1761- Al . . lob 44 - ,. �, � _ ',• � ;*,. .'*•,s_ = - � �}•. - � .ASS - � �. dell 1 Wig it - I I I L* w� ' .:�,. "1 ~ � •��} �• �• , '`-_ 'fir 1 - �'� _ 'r���i t k h�'F a'� � + � r• TA Ap -ham •'�F _ ,�,Agar 'y -•f _ f r II W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Lennon Pointe Subdivision (H-2024-0060) by Rodney Evans + Partners, LLC., located at SE Corner of N. Linder Rd. and W. Ustick Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0060 A. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 41 single-family/townhome residential building lots, one (1) multi-family residential building lots, one (1) commercial building lot and Seven (7) common lots on 8.80 acres of land in the R-15 and C-C zoning districts with some private streets. STAFF REPORT E IDIAN*-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r A M O HEARING 1/21/2025 DATE: Legend ® 0 yProject Location TO: Mayor&CityCouncil H ello 1 mlwffi"'� FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner --- 208-884-5533 d._ SUBJECT: H-2024-0060 Lennon Pointe—PP,PS LOCATION: 1515 W.Ustick Road, at the southeast FFFrFL corner of N. Linder Rd. and W.Ustick Rd.,in the NW 1/4 of Section 1 T.3N. ; RAW. (Parcel#S1201223115) I � L I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Preliminary Plat consisting of 41 single-family/townhome residential building lots, one(1)multi- family building lots, one (1)commercial building lot and seven(7) common lots on 8.80-acres of land in the R-15 and C-C zoning districts. Approval of private streets in a portion of the project is also proposed. This application is reviewed and approved by the Director; Commission and Council action is not required. Note:A Development Agreement(DA) exists for this property that requires future development to be consistent with the previously approvedplans for this site, including the preliminary plat, which was for the same lot configuration as proposed but with one (1) less lot. The previous preliminary plat expired on March 8, 2024.A time extension was not requested prior to the expiration date; therefore, a new preliminary plat application is required. The only changes to the plans are those required with the previous application and due to updates to the UDC since the previous submittal. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Acreage 8-80-acres Future Land Use Designation Mixed Use Community(MU-C) Existing Land Use(s) Single-family rural residential/agricultural Proposed Land Use(s) Residential(single-family attached and detached homes,townhomes, and multi-family apartments)and commercial Lots(#and type;bldg./common) 41 single-family&townhome, 1 multi-family residential, 1 commercial and 7 common lots Pagel Description Details Phasing Plan(#of phases) 1 Number of Residential Units 59 residential units(3 single-family detached,30 single-family attached, (type of units) 8 townhome and 18 multi-family apartment units) Density Gross—7.35 du/ac.;Net—18.55 du/ac. Open Space(acres,total 1.33-acres(or 19.07%)of qualified open space [%]/buffer/qualified) Amenities Dog park,(2)dog waste stations,playground,pedestrian/bicycle circulation system with landscaping,multi-se pathway and(5)bicycle storage Physical Features(waterways, The Creason Lateral crosses the southwest corner of this site and the hazards,flood plain,hillside) Kellogg Drain crosses the southern portion of the site.Floodplain exists over a majority of the site. Neighborhood meeting date 10/7/24 History(previous approvals) H-2021-0071 (AZ,PP,CUP,PS—DA Inst.#2022-041093),ESMT- 2023-0098,FP-2023-0004 B. Community Metrics Description Details Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no Access One(1)full access is proposed via N.Linder Rd.and one(1)right-in/right-out access is (Arterial/Collectors/State proposed via W.Ustick Rd.,both arterial streets;access is also proposed via the Hwy/Local)(Existing and extension&connection of W.Pebblestone Dr and N.Zion Park Ave.,both existing Proposed) local streets stubbed to this property. Private Streets are also proposed internally for access and addressing purposes. Traffic Level of Service Linder Road—Better than"E" Ustick Road—Better than"E" (Acceptable level of service is"E") Stub Two local stub streets exist to the east(W.Pebblestone Dr.)and south(N.Zion Park Street/Interconnectivity/Cross Ave.)property boundaries that are proposed to be extended and connect into one street. Access Internal private streets are proposed for access and addressing purposes,which will connect to the extended local streets. Access to the commercial property at the northwest corner of the site is proposed via drive aisle connections to the proposed private street and the multi-family drive aisle. Access to the multi-family units is proposed via a drive aisle. Existing Road Network Internal road network is not existing. Existing Arterial Sidewalks/ There is existing 7-foot wide attached sidewalks along Linder&Ustick Roads. Street Buffers buffers will be installed with development of this project. Proposed Road Improvements Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)f Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • Linder Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Ustick Road to Cherry Lane in the future with the design year of 2025. • Ustick Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Linder Road to Ten Mile Road in 2025. • Linder Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Ustick Road to Cherry Lane between 2036 and 2040. • Ustick Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from Linder Road to Ten Mile Road between 2021 and 2025. Note:Linder&Ustick Roads have already been widened to 5-lanes adjacent to this site. Page 2 Description Details Fire Service Comments received from FD on previous application) • Distance to Fire 1.5 miles from Fire Station#2 Station im • Fire Response Time This project lies within the Meridian Fire response time goal of 5 minutes. • Resource Reliability Fire Station#2 reliability is 85%. _ • Risk Identification Risk Factor 4—commercial with hazards(multi-family waterway) • Accessibility Proposed project meets all required access,road widths,and turnarounds;Fire has signed off on Private Street layout. Addressing for project is very important for emergency responses;Applicant shall work with City Addressing Agent and the Fire Official to have lighted maps wherever necessary. Police Service Comments received from PD on previous application) • Distance to Station Approximately 4.2 miles from Meridian Police Department • Response Time Approximate 4-minute response time to an emergency. West Ada School District See school impact table in the Agency Comments folder in the project file. Enrollment in area schools is under capacity based on 2023-2024 enrollment numbers. Wastewater • Distance to sewer services Directly adjacent • Project consistent with Yes wastewater master plan/facility plan? • Impacts/concerns Flow is committed; see Public Works Site Specific Conditions Water • Distance to water services Directly adjacent • Project consistent with Yes water master plan? • Impacts/concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions C. Project Area Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend 0 Legend nr' Pro}ec#Lava fan Proiea#Lac❑=orMCI _ HEEI mow' sift' w I 'i ffi1A .k . . dm i FHT�ffl .' { +` i Page 3 Zoning Map Planned Development Map cc cc Legend Legend Prof adi i Lacor. - Wolet Prn' t Laca-flor. Wo RUT RUT R-8 — P:arred Paro�. Ru : - RUT -. - RU RUT � EEE o RUT III. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant: Benjamin Semple,Rodney Evans+Partners, LLC 1450 W. Bannock St., Boise, ID 83702 B. Owner: Lane Development,LLC—PO Box 608,Eagle,ID 83616 C. Representative: Same as Applicant IV. NOTICING Planning&Zoning City Council Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper Notification 12/3/2024 Radius notification mailed to properties within 500 feet 12/19/2024 Site Posting 12/9/2024 Nextdoor posting 11/26/2024 V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. Comprehensive Plan(https:llwww.meridianciV.or /�compplan) The subject property is designated as Mixed Use—Community(MU-C)on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM) contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the MU-C designation is to allocate areas where community-serving uses and dwellings are seamlessly integrated into the urban fabric. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses, including residential,and to avoid mainly single-use and strip commercial type buildings. Page 4 Non-residential buildings in these areas have a tendency to be larger than in Mixed Use Neighborhood(MU-N) areas,but not as large as in Mixed Use Regional(MU-R)areas. Goods and services in these areas tend to be of the variety that people will mainly travel by car to,but also walk or bike to(up to three or four miles). Employment opportunities for those living in and around the neighborhood are encouraged. The subject property was annexed in 2021 with R-1 S and C-C zoning districts and approved through a Development Agreement(DA) to develop with a mix of single family residential detached and attached homes, townhomes, multi family apartments and commercial uses as proposed with this application consistent with the MU-C designation. The proposed preliminary plat layout coincides with that previously approved for this property in accord with the DA and accommodates the site development plan included in the DA. The larger MU-C area is all developed except for the 4.6-acre property kitty corner to this site at the northwest corner of Linder& Ustick Roads, which consists of vacant land; office uses exist to the north across Ustick Rd. on a 4-acre parcel and an Ada County Emergency Medical Services center exists to the west across Linder Rd. on a 1.6-acre parcel. Overall, Stafffinds the proposed site design does integrate the project and proposed uses in appropriate manners. Specifically, the Applicant has proposed their multi family residential product along Ustick and the commercial buildings at the hard corner of the Ustick and Linder intersection which places the most intense uses closest to the arterials. Therefore, the single- family uses are proposed on the remaining area of the site that makes up approximately 70%of the site area. The single-family portion of the site is as proposed to be 2-stories in height and the townhomes are proposed to be 3-stories in height. Because of the proposed transitional density and placement of the proposed uses, this project is generally consistent with the concept diagrams in the City's Comprehensive Plan for mixed-use designations. Therefore,Stafffinds the proposed project to be generally consistent with the MU-C designation. B. Comprehensive Plan Policies (https://www.meridiancioy.orglcompplan): The applicable Comprehensive Plan policies are cited below with Staff analysis in italics. • "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area; provide for diverse housing types throughout the City"(2.01.01 G). This project proposes a mix of residential housing types and commercial land uses in one development.All of the housing types in this area are detached single-family homes; therefore, the additional housing types will contribute to the variety of housing types available in this area. • "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices" (3.07.01A). The proposed site design incorporates mews,private streets, an extension of public streets, common open space, and different land uses within the same project area. Stafffinds the proposed site design is compatible with adjacent uses through transitional density, buffering, and overall design. • "Establish and maintain levels of service for public facilities and services,including water, sewer,police,transportation, schools, fire,and parks"(3.02.01 G). All public utilities are available for this project site due to existing facilities abutting the site. This project also lies within the Fire Department response time goal of 5 minutes.Linder and Ustick Roads are currently built at their ultimate anticipated widths directly abutting the site. Page 5 • "Preserve,protect,and provide open space for recreation, conservation,and aesthetics" (4.05.01F). The proposed project offers open space that exceeds the minimum UDC standards for such.A large common area is proposed at the southwest corner of the site where the irrigation facilities and their easements lie. Additionally, there is a mew running north-south through the center of the development for the attached single-family units to front on green space rather than the road network, which adds a more livable component to the project. Other areas of open space are also proposed along the west boundary as a buffer from Linder Rd. as well as a dog park. All of the open space areas are accessible through pedestrian facilities that connect throughout the entire site. Staff supports the proposed open space areas and anticipates they will provide recreation, conservation, and add to the aesthetics of the project. • "Establish distinct, engaging identities within commercial and mixed-use centers through design standards."(2.09.03A). As discussed above, the proposed project offers a distinct set of uses and design that are currently not available nearby. The site plan included in the DA for this project incorporates two (2) commercial buildings at the northwest corner of the site with a shared plaza for use by the residents and future business patrons. This is a desired aspect of mixed-use areas that helps engage the commercial buildings with the residential component of a project. Additionally, in accord with the submitted elevations and site renderings, the Applicant is proposing distinct architecture for the project that creates a specific identity for this development and corner property. In addition to general Comprehensive Plan policies,projects in mixed-use areas should also aim to meet the mixed-use policies.Rather than list them all in this report, Staff has analyzed the project against them and finds the project to be consistent with a majority of those policies outlined in the mixed-use area of the Comprehensive Plan here. Therefore, Staff finds this development to be generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and a majority of the mixed use policies. C. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There is an existing single-family detached home and accessory buildings on this property. All existing structures are required to be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat for this property. There are existing sidewalks along Linder and Ustick Roads that will remain; care should be taken during construction to not damage these walkways. D. Proposed Use Analysis: A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 41 single-family/townhome residential building lots, one(1)multi-family building lot for the development of 18 apartment units,one(1) commercial building lot for two (2)building pads and(7) common lots on 8.80-acres of land in the R-15 and C-C zoning districts. The plat is proposed to develop in one (1)final plat phase. A mix of residential housing types are proposed on 7.28-acres of land in the R-15 district consisting of three (3) single-family detached units, 30 single-family attached units, 8 townhome units and 18 multi-family apartment units. The proposed single-family and townhome uses are principally permitted in the R-15 zoning district;the multi-family residential use is a conditional use in R-15 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2 and will require future approval of a conditional use permit(CUP); compliance with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3- Page 6 27 is also required.Previous CUP approval was granted but has since expired as a time extension was not requested prior to the expiration date. The commercial portion of the site consists of two (2)building pads totaling 12,000 square feet at the northwest corner of the site at the Linder/Ustick intersection on 1.47 acres in the C-C district. Tenants are unknown at this time,but the site plan included in the DA shows the larger building at the hard corner with a drive-through on the east side, and the smaller building along the south boundary of the C-C area adjacent to a shared plaza. If a drive-through is proposed in the future, it will require approval of a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) as it's within 300-feet of a residential use and district. See UDC Table 11-213-2 for allowed uses in the C-C zoning district. Commercial buildings require Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Design Review application approval; compliance with UDC development standards will be evaluated at that time. E. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): Development in the R-15 district should comply with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7. All of the residential building lots comply with the minimum property size standard;there is no minimum street frontage required in the R-15 district. Building setbacks and heights should comply with the standards listed. Development in the C-C district should comply with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3. There is no minimum lot size or street frontage requirement in the C-C district,nor are there minimum front,rear or interior side setback requirements. Buildings may not encroach in required street buffers or buffers to residential uses. Buildings should not exceed the maximum height standard of 50-feet. F. Subdivision Design&Improvement Standards (11-6C-3): All subdivisions are required to comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3. A common driveway is proposed on Lot 13 off N. Zion Park Ave.,a local street, for access to the single-family homes proposed on Lots 14-16,Block 2 at the southeast corner of the site as shown in the exhibit in Section VII.0 below. The driveway complies with the standards for such listed in UDC 11-6C-3D pertaining to maximum number of dwelling units to be served by the driveway and the number of units located on one side of the driveway, and the minimum width and maximum length standards. The exhibit depicts the proposed building envelopes with building setbacks—the side,rear and front setback to living area comply with the standards but the front setback to garage is below the minimum 20-foot standard—a portion of the 20-feet is depicted on the adjacent common lot where the common driveway is located. The plat should be revised to reflect wider building lots to accommodate the front setback to garage on the building lot so that parking pads in front of garages are on privately owned lots rather than common lots. A minimum 20-foot wide perpetual ingress/egress easement should also be depicted on Lot 13 for the common driveway(or the driveway may be placed in a separate common lot), and a plat note should be included for the easement,which requires maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. Street names should be included on the plat in accord with the names approved by the Ada County Street Name Review Committee in the final approval letter included in Section VII.G below. G. Access(UDC 11-3A-3, 11-3H-4)&Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): One(1)full access is proposed via N. Linder Rd., an arterial street,which may be restricted to a right-in/right-out if warranted by ACHD in the future; and one(1) access is proposed via W. Ustick Rd., an arterial street,which is restricted by"candles"in the center median to right- Page 7 in/right-out.Access is also proposed via the extension and connection of W. Pebblestone Dr at the east boundary of the site and N. Zion Park Ave. at the south boundary of the site,both existing local streets stubbed to this property. A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was not required as less than 100 residential units are proposed. An emergency access exhibit was submitted, included in Section VII.F,that has been approved by the Fire Dept. An in regress easement should be provided on the plat across Lots 2 and 3,Block 1 granting access to all lots in the subdivision. Twenty-six(26) foot wide private streets are proposed on Lot 4,Block 1 for addressing purposes and for access to/from the single-family attached and townhome units on the western portion of the site. Because the lot is wider than the actual easement for the private streets,the easements should be depicted on the lot to delineate the location of the private streets. Connection points are proposed via the local street(W. Pebblestone Dr./N. Zion Park Ave.) on the eastern portion of the site. The proposed development incorporates a mew in accord with the purpose statement for private streets; a gated development is not proposed. The private street should be a loop off the local street and should not extend to the west of N.W. 15'"Ln. along the north side of Lot 11,Block 1; Lot 4,Block 1 should terminate on the west side of N.W. 15"Ln.A cross-section of the proposed private streets is included below and in Section VII.B,which demonstrates compliance with the standards for private streets listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Five-foot wide sidewalks are proposed along private streets. The proposed private streets shall comply with the construction standards listed in UDC 11-317-413.2. An ingress/egress/cross-access easement shall be depicted on the plat granting access to all lots in the subdivision to use the private streets on Lot 4,Block 1.All drive aisles/private streets shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed as set forth in UDC 11-3F-4B.2d.In addition,if a curb exists next to the drive aisle,it shall be painted red. RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH=3UFT 5 WIDTH S WIDTH SIDEWALK STREET WIDTH BACK OF CURB TO BACK of CURB=26FT SIDEWALK �• CENTER CROWN BETWEEN CURBS L%MAXI 296 2% 96 7MAR Law 2 1 � � PRIVATE ROAD SECTION SCPLE NTs A maintenance agreement was submitted for the proposed private streets,included in the project file,which appears to only require property owners of single-family and townhome lots to pay for maintenance costs associated with the private streets within the development, which all lots,including the commercial and multi-family development,will be using. Because this would place and undue hardship on residential lot owners,Staff recommends the maintenance agreement is amended to include proportionate cost-share for maintenance of the private streets between all lots within the subdivision. Page 8 The driveway via Linder Rd. for the commercial portion of the development and the drive north of Lot 11,Block 1 between the townhomes and commercial lot should include a cross- access/ingress/egress easement for all lots within the subdivision to use these driveways. Note:Staff is only supportive of the proposed layout with the private streets because of the previous development approved and entitled to develop on this site, which included private streets in the proposed layout. The proposed site layout with both commercial and residential uses utilizing the private streets places an undue burden on the homeowners in Staffs opinion and should not be supported in the future. H. Pathways (UDC 11-3A-8): A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway is required along the Creason Lateral in the southwest corner of the property,which will provide a connection between the existing pathway to the south and the sidewalk/pathway along Linder Rd. in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. A public use easement(ESMT-2023-0098)was previously recorded for the multi-use pathway on this site in conjunction with the previous development application; however,the Park's Dept. requested this easement be vacated and a new easement recorded in a new location,which is currently in process(ESMT-2024-0165). The easement should be graphically depicted on the plat along with a reference to the recorded instrument number of the easement. The landscape plan depicts the correct location of the pathway. Internal pedestrian pathways are also proposed for access through common areas within the site and for interconnectivity between residential and commercial uses in accord with development guidelines for mixed-use developments. 1. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): A 7-foot wide attached sidewalk exists along Linder and Ustick Roads abutting the site. Because these sidewalks were recently constructed with the associated road widening projects and are in good condition, Staff does not recommend they're reconstructed as detached sidewalks as typically required by UDC 11-3A-17. In consideration of pedestrian safety as well as traffic calming for the site, the DA requires all pedestrian crossings that cross the private street and any drive aisle be constructed with brick pavers, stamped concrete, or equal,as outlined in UDC 11-3A-1913.4b. J. Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to N.Linder Road and W. Ustick Road,both arterial streets,measured from the back of the attached sidewalk,with landscaping per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. A 25-foot wide common lot is depicted on the plat adjacent to both streets;however,the southern portion of the buffer along Linder cannot accommodate trees in the common lot due to the location of the Calkins Lateral easement. The UDC(11-3B-7C.lb) states that where the buffer is encumbered by easements or other restrictions that the buffer area shall include a minimum 5-foot wide area for planting shrubs and trees outside of the easement. The landscape plan depicts trees outside of the easement area as required. Lawn and other grasses requiring regular mowing shall comprise no more than 65% of the vegetated coverage of the buffer; all other vegetated coverage shall be mulched and treated as planting area for shrubs or other vegetative cover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.3e.Also, because the buffers were counted toward qualified open space, enhanced buffers are required per the standards in UDC 11-3G-3B.3 and 11-3B-7C.3f.Revisions shall be made to the landscape plan to comply with these standards. Page 9 Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C,which include a mix of trees and shrubs along with lawn or other vegetative groundcover. Landscaping is depicted on the landscape plan in accord with UDC standards. A portion of the multi-use pathway lies within the easement for the Kellogg Drain,which prohibits trees—trees are placed outside of the easement area. Common open space is required to be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3G-5B.3,which requires one (1)tree per 5,000 square feet of area with a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover. The calculation table on the landscape plan should be updated to reflect compliance with this standard;the calculations included on the plan are not up to date with current standards. The proposed C-C zoning district requires a minimum 25-foot landscape buffer to a residential zoning district,landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-9C. This buffer is not required with the subdivision improvements but will be required with development of the C-C zoned lot. The buffer depicted on the landscape plan is below the required minimum width; the previous development application for this site proposed 10- feet on the C-C zoned property and 10-feet on the R-15 zoned property with the requirement of an additional 5-feet to be provided. Staff is amenable with this request if still proposed because it's a mixed-use development,provided a dense landscape buffer consisting of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees,shrubs,lawn,or other vegetative groundcover is provided that allows trees to touch within five(5)years of planting as set forth in UDC 11-313-9C. K. Waterways(UDC 11-3A-6): The subject property contains two major waterways,the Creason Lateral and the Kellogg Drain, that encompass area on the south and southwest portions of the site. The Applicant proposes to pipe the Kellogg Drain and re-route it further to the south to make more area of the site usable as well as provide open space and pathways in the southwest corner of the site and along the west boundary. Both waterways are proposed to be piped in accord with UDC 11-3A-6 to provide more usable open space area for the site. The easements for such are depicted on the plat. The easement should also be clearly depicted on the landscape plan to ensure no trees are located within the easement. A majority of the site is in the floodplain in zones AE &X,which will require a floodplain development permit before any site work begins. L. Qualified Open Space (UDC 11-3G): A minimum of 15%qualified open space meeting the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 is required for the single-family and townhome portion of the development. Analysis on the open space area associated with the multi-family portion will take place with the future CUP application. Based on 6.96-acres,a minimum of 1.05-acres of qualified open space is required;the open space exhibit submitted with this application, included below in Section VII.E, depicts a total of 1.33- acres(or 19.07%). Proposed open space consists of linear open space exceeding 20' x 50' in area with an access at each end improved with landscaping, open grassy areas exceeding 5,000 square feet in area, 50%of the arterial street buffers along Linder&Ustick Roads, stormwater retention facility, and a plaza with a minimum dimension of 20' in all directions,which meets and exceeds UDC standards. In order to count toward the qualified open space requirement,the arterial street buffers are required to comply with the enhanced buffer requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.3; Page 10 stormwater detention facilities are required to be designed in accord with UDC 11-3B-11 Stormwater Integration(gravel, rock, sand,or cobble stormwater facilities are not permitted on the surface of required landscape areas,unless designed as a dry creek bed or other design feature); and the plaza is required to be design in accord with the standards in UDC 11-3G-3B.1d,which requires hardscape, seating,lighting in accord with UDC 11-3A- 11 and landscaping. M. Qualified Site Amenities (UDC 11-3G): Based on the area of the proposed plat(8.75 acres), site amenities totaling a minimum of two (2) points are required to be provided per the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-4. The applicant proposes amenities consisting of a dog park with a dog wash station(2 points),two (2)dog waste stations(1 point), a tot lot with commercial grade play equipment(1 point), a short segment of multi-use pathway, internal pedestrian/bicycle circulation system with landscaping and(5)bicycle storage exceeding the minimum standards. The dog park,dog waste stations and tot lot should comply with the associated standards for such in UDC 11-3G-4C included below; the landscape plan(or a detail) submitted with the final plat application should demonstrate compliance with these standards. The dog park should include bags for dog waste disposal, a double entrance gate,benches and fencing to enclose a minimum of 5,000 square feet and secured open space for an off- leash dog park.The waste stations should be an installed in the ground fixture with waste disposal bags and trash receptacle. The tot lot should have commercial grade play equipment scaled and designed for the use and safety of younger children; benches for seating should be nearby. N. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): Fencing is proposed as shown on the landscape plan.All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. A separate fencing plan was submitted as shown in Section VII.I,that complies with UDC standards. O. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual building elevations and renderings were submitted with this application, included in Section VII.H below,that are generally consistent with those approved with the previous development application and included in the DA. An administrative design view application is required to be submitted for all structures on the site except for the single-family detached structures. The final design is required to comply with the design standards in the ASM and the conceptual elevations included in the DA. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC)application is required to be submitted for the multi- family residential and commercial portions of the development,which should be submitted concurrently with the design review application. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat application per the Findings in Section IX of this staff report. The Director tentatively approved the private street application. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 19,2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject PP request. Page 11 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Ben Semple,Rodney Evans+Partners b. In opposition: None C. Commenting: Joy Furlipa d. Written testimony: Ben Semple,Rodney Evans+Partners(in agreement with the staff report conditions) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Concern with traffic stacking in front of the driveway access via Ustick Rd. preventing vehicles from exiting the site—requests a painted"square"is placed in that area to prevent stacking in that area to enable access out of the site. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. None 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. At Staff s request,include a condition requiring an ingress-egress easement to be depicted on the plat across Lots 2 and 3,Block 1 granting access to all lots in the subdivision. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: Pending Page 12 VII. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 10/25/24) ft�!l� IL- 1 mNOISIAicens 4a r y 9 �g g � _-�a�y a�kl �1�. �� Ally f ➢ IH {!� ,99� �; ��@p !! E 7i l+ psi €� : l 1 MaI z I� r � err 0 I '� 2L' __g 'd` , �ogtu ^Is ii; <. rid l! ii% le iii li ii9 ii L— a. r L I I I I I - --- - _ % I _ ' A- ; N� a['Yx fnSEas J ' b T C ] + y C w 3 F e u5p� III � $ 43€ 3 �o Sa ( g o[ fir g4 Page 13 NO IS IA cons will J� I , � I " I I • I I , ! I I A� IN r J Q < t• I _ � I � I `a I I °a I dd�f++ r'' I I I '—I" j e� �y I I ` �� i � •�� I o a „o oII,� �IlO .alla .ollo � � � '�I '� I I I � l ii I p•ifh� 'I Ili 7T, (� + /� Ilr�1 nn Ilp �� f/ i .• !� 'Cl IIv G II� l Y' - ml .g 1L 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 • 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 yp � @9 { FFF E';E FE�fiE Page 14 B. Private Street Cross-Section(dated: 4/19/23) arm w.eeai'asioe Z VlV1301IN0 9wain%Qo u&Ls@M �� "-LUNCONM E-M M (KM95NjllM9NOO NMMJs M NOISIA109115 e, MNIOd NONN3l V V yyy g�jy .- � 0 au�Na awn N,u � ¢ 9a �y9 V F2 In H V) �d 6 � yard aawanwnas yaw wao w g � � 9 0 2N a Page 15 C. Common Driveway Exhibit � I �; v�va�'•av3e cs I r I o m .I I � lI 3AINCI NOVIMOO woa3 I } � x�vel3s 3svavO �roz f �a woa� R NOV9135 3Jtl atl ,I b l l x Va133 OaV,�iNOaQ,IC L6 4 f y - I � Y Y I' 3Aia0 NOYINm I � I f •°° a 01 010 W Um X + r N W 9 w •`;' - _� iI- n,i Ill II—P.•y 1 I-T. —IN sill,u Page 16 D. Landscape Plan(dated: 10/11/2024) dnl MD soeesa+•35ba �,uUJ 5N00 WI-laM VOO'eoR mns'AW IVUDMd 5 use fix•ewaEi ONILlMMW NWRLS" 31 NDd NONN31 4 5 R tit go Mill R� y GgSg ! & 7 C jib .. � 9 fll I �5@I�lgpe 11°aa11, 11 h Ili E a � 6 $ efp °£ l S �• !gg R � 9 . $g.e a �b 1F�`ea as@g " 1I Hill Hill, w� R�iY Rezaa�$ee�s9E�Ee74 fa� �a ��ii�gy(� 8pg ep§ � a •• 9+a• e!!• d� pp@�(g�C�� �°g�i�i60p�Q�°�� =a� Jill q I I I � I II •`` r• it it r I e J r 4[ r CIO 0 I J Page 17 dnoo sects a asloa 94LIMOD UIS;M nm to,3Lf1S'Aym wu3md S LM n g � d'driouo C M111SWO WaISW NOIS IAloonS 1 '1J € tltlyy q E p aMod NONNd-1 a � 1MM i�!■L� 228 66 y Y MINIM, � g3�� Eagg� iyg9��� 4 d EE 'gg lib 5 �$ yqyq a � J � y3 �: zeS� gps 9$¢ pBaRa yp4g p$p Jj9 a aY1 • dRRe � SRaai ¢Qa�3ly $e CGSE$ S Iyy U1 g 9 ��E€ pgp eg,g g ppd a91 a �e� �` � s444g y@ j �9 SE . gEggRg 4 ip9$ y 9a� i � 9 gg $ §q ipg AgYh �i � g 8 ��i� ;� � Yb4 �gg=i •qi � �g �Ra��3�� gi�,1� �� 9 � �Y� �g O p��� tp� w�ajp��g3i� ���` oilo Y iB k � k 79 6 "gi� ��15�8l pill 1 1211 1! !��pH u� � 5� p�p�gyI N O 0. RISFEy� i 9 F •t ilia g11 F R 111 !g ■Y gg� g gllggll €g�= IIlI � II �gll �glll i :_@ �q 4�d6 dca ��a �9i6 I I I I 31 E t _ IY . 4. � I o. _ 5 a II - I ❑ = ¢` �F cl w �Fip 7 e 0 Page 18 nir i•n ��.�ay;� �■ozo�o net ®a ©m A7....a���;�®a ®m . Ammm...:Am ' ®m °mmm°lmm°aam®o��mam°e®immFlNFull o °►4 "ne �, ?2�=WIN ®l 1p sec N •! ®° om�m it ®mem®mml °mNi®m ©mm I c i a°�m�o= �il III ®m ■ . . ■ al®°®lilac®® rr dnobD svccsoi' iae `.XdLlf15NO71Jtl31.43M ',Ynd'"wo DMILlnsmoo NG9YS]M �••� NOISIN9H(iS m 31NIOd NONN31 gS dd R Z g 5218le m uj ' •i .i � - I 'I � I o • Y Jgx ��y �. � JJJJJ 'J' -•® JJJJ J 1. JJJJJJJJJJJJJ ,iJ'JJJ "e ,�''•'•'• W ® I JJJJJJJJJ JJJJJ) JJ JJ -'' wLU l FI �. W i ' W Y P�-1••- Wr LLY W x r �.:3H0 I/ N as a'�]aNn .� 9�Lii Page 20 dImr saLcsa,'3spa UNLLInSNQD NN3L53M voo'eo;3L=lS'Aw-Tv 3mi s Lm • OTM'"UO OHLLl11SWO HJEM-Sa 6 NOISIN9Hfi5 31NIDd NONN31 a 21 LLJ _ R y t g a I Y R W Y W Rgg R LL �1ZLUL �Y a WLL L DS 1110 �€ � 6 b ° EMU Ell m LU la 5 wi W •Sm 7n v2-�P ��� ^� ��m O �^�a I � �a a-• � J� as JJ� � W F k 'k Sep af3'�^e I� 4a £'1133H533S 3NIlH�ldW _" ------- — J Page 21 dnaND socraoi'askoa 9XLLln5N40 IJtI]14aM K O V;3LnS'AW laL9®i 5 cur • 011id'd)DU i ONLOrISM67 MSL53a1 HOISIN9Hf15 UNIOd NONN3i Nil H will Jim m� TS Ye � �R55 i pp ee AAddW Milli" cIFiiii E jH tH aMlTj p p p p p p w [ [ 5 g w �I eaaaaa ea �I 3 $ $ R $ $ S F S W A 3 Y • I M Y • k b k � h Y k Y 1 k h Y h } h S F F M w M S S h h M S M h � r � � � � � � � � � aeaieaeaeaeeaea aeedieiii ii � iidiai � ii g��ff fli Jill H11I 1s��E�4$ $ 1&141F1 i I I d1$1 �1 $ LE oI ffiA e • " " A 9S o W 6 6 N 8 R B E R 8 9 a B 8IR eigaa 3 & 8 jm € e48 Q d e t E3 ie @ 4Q e t f g ssm ae a $ ss € Page 22 E. Open Space Exhibit(date: 10/11/2024)&Amenity Detail 40, G] 111 z r W 4 N g � a W ¢ D w Ir a �dF�.M1LL Ulm {� Qu Z F m Z O N K N O e' ❑ U U) //�� [J� UW LL n g G a V KV H K N�. Ir��l S��S'•�.20 t}t q 0 LZ-1 FF 2 pZp O Q q 0' LL N n N J NF W�Wr�Z a ❑ tiaarcz y2Y W, O Q .9 f� Z UF?d SLL HQ OL-a ^ 4JJ V Q4 2400 O � aH 49�l7 V j y W �, '�9, d yo.�..ig'�J� w LL yoOQ W ❑ af0- wowo z.,E II�PF_ J w () ❑ �N ioO Fc Z wOo a3c�7 Fu aw W L.L OoxFo; gc r10 =�`�wo J ow u�>jQ Q oaaV ❑ r 0 F1gdO � ircd Z UU 00 rca U [n J I� o - I \ ' ❑ III r U ~ ms D � I � W s Q d --� fh e m LU ;{ o o — - 0 '0�J JEGNII 'N �I- iu, ql 1 ITT.. ..- IF -I.,lu W q� 2 (7 u w o u m 4 Page 23 b' illll II F. Emergency Access Exhibit X313NI HV Id OM zkts '35IO8 1N3W3AOMdWl Avmavou e ` LIfYW NMI-'AM -LS)IDONNY9-M ZRVI �° T g • '.Tlld'dMMO EHUIMNOO NaR�MM NOISIAl ClO1S 0 31NI0d NONN3l b G z. 6 4� 3 w 0 -- I t: W I I x i i 1 �� _ W� NJI:JN VfilVll li`.I VLllil l- - - - -- x _ l 4 1 '•—_ _—W vj-IJ3TICK ENTRM7CE'.: LU W,4 NW 157H LN N V—_ - _ _ _ _ , 1 rr I N V I J ,- F til Twillfi{� 7 ! N LINDER ROAD A ' I Page 25 G. Street Names Approved by the Ada County Street Name Review Committee :r ev1110 19 _ 2E FF all 9� {U �✓ t �p tm 9 � a� w € { �yr,� � 5O'�E9 M,S4,EOAO6 9p�a xen ai ue a a c RR.Sa ]y I 171 1 i 0 ! 0 0 !0 0 ! 0 0'10 ryO 5 ffY Ae C['PE .°f`ce OtY[ {diCN Aa ii de iL Ae G[ °i [ [SM _ (OVUIi�Il9 fld)-3Atl]IMVd N4�2-N O a W'fL Wii OQ'H W'[i AYH Ai'l � a HE ff �u of '� 1 �@I C11 Ala I oil@ a.(D e .cvx isu N4 $ 00 ��NlQH15T MN , m �o s a a a� 81� (DI� o1- o a ak R� 0 � oow a ,95'SL i M.EO.[0 AON ��? ro� xiana 6 R - -aaon]n•[ram ,EP9[Vi x .. ,GT'669Z M.EO.I9.00N �Nt211017]9 do SISVU Page 26 H. Conceptual Building Elevations See the project file for renderings of the proposed structures (https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=367303&dbid=0&repo=MeridianQ E � I LEE 7. g fir. � VIA �N e b �Iti �I I I I' I I ' Kpp I f II� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 27 gin: •n II II�Ig - IIIIIIIIII O"EM ;;:�.� -I ; -- ==1::■= ::■I .. III n■■■_ ---!II _■■ - IIIIIIIIII I mm II I -"I mw : I IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII ;III I� I!II:�':I �ii::■: IIIII -Worn n■ ::■:! .■■■ ■■ IN i. �— 'III-1 � II'� —'++�.■■ :■ II1111�I —� ■■ ■■ ■■■ =� ��, Illllill: ■■ ::■;•.IIII _■■■� ■■■ � lr� — III- ■■■ �� i� :. ::■ I �: ::!IIIIIII I��I,!!!!I� �� --::■ II11� ; ::. ::■I ; . ,� III:��:I '- — = IIIIII ..■ �.■ l�III 11,=, • ti� IIIIIIIIIII __ � == IIIIIIIIIII ulllll IIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIII � -IIII®_ e:: ?; I IIIIIIIIIII __ II IIIIIII" ;I� �IIIIIIII��IIIIII I III II®-_ ■■ ::.', - � �IIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIII = — —L_ ..■ ::■��� =_ _ IIIIII IIIIIIIIIII �,� .. = IIIII�_ �== IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII�;��I� I I ; II'll' = ==: IN 111; o II ::■ it 'i I ■■. le' 1 ::I IIIIIIIIII; IIIIIIIIIIIIII = '- " I IIIIIIIIIIII�I II I I I WE MOON �� � "':■= IIIII�' II11�=II � mom u 1=Ji.am "■■I ■IIII I "■:"■:"'■■■ rIllIlI II -_ IIIIIIIIIII _ IIIIIII�i1� "I,� —_= IIIII;;(: � IIIIIIIIII III ----���� - =1== IIIII 1��I �::. � ::■ I. I _ � I� o M141EE] tl El Page 29 e n �Tj tilt 1I 6 ��- �Iz gti s I I _ I I I I I I I I = I I I I I I I I I h I 41 lab I I Y I I — I I Page 30 o� No 0 �I rl I I I I I W I L� I I I I I I I I � ale d b �I d� di° FI FI ° I I I I fi 1 J 'w Page 31 x Y d$ h h �If 1I- II � - �4 _ Wp i II� 9 = F I Page 32 � � | � � � | || � | � § � � � | � § § � � § � � | | � | � � | | | � | § � \ | � � � �� lb ° \ � \ ; ...... ..... ............... .... ........ ----------------- ............ ............ .... ........ ............ ... ........ ............... ..................... ........ ...... ..... ....... § ...... --- §| §� , i i § § � � \ / Page 33 5 � , | . • � | I \ ( — � .. § �. §2 � ƒ . ` \ \ § � \ §MIT Ll �( I Page 34 I. Fencin Plan lan(dated: 12/17/24) x Z Le ^Le W ❑ �D yD w� Z LU �m Um pp¢ LL¢ LU S[7 a[7 n Z U Z LU L �9 ou I I I I I I A V/ z L `� 2 L7 w w ❑ ti m C Page 35 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. PLANNING DIVISION 1. The developer shall comply with the provisions of the existing Development Agreement (DA),recorded as Instrument No. 2022-041093, associated with H-2021-0071. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Widen Lots 14-16,Block 2 to accommodate the minimum front setback of 20-feet to the face of garage on these lots. b. Depict a minimum 20-foot wide perpetual ingress/egress easement on Lot 13 for the common driveway and include a note for the easement requiring maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C- 3D.8.Alternatively,a separate 20-foot wide common lot could be included for the common driveway. c. Plat note#7 includes incorrect common lot numbers;revise accordingly and remove the portion pertaining to the common driveway. d. Depict a 26-foot wide easement for the private street on Lot 4,Block 1 and include a note granting an ingress/egress/cross-access easement to all lots in the subdivision to use the private streets on Lot 4,Block 1. e. Include street names on the plat consistent with those approved by the Ada County Street Name Review Committee as shown in the exhibit in Section VII.G above. f. Graphically depict the public use easement(ESMT-2024-0165) for the multi-use pathway on the site along with a reference to the recorded instrument number of the easement. g. The private street shall be a loop off the local street(i.e.N. Zion Park Ave./W. Pebblestone Dr.) and shall not extend to the west of N.W. 15th Ln. along the north side of Lot 11,Block 1;the private street shall terminate on the west side of N.W. 15t'Ln. h. Depict an access easement for the driveway proposed via N. Linder Rd. to the commercial property on Lot 3,Block 1 and for the driveway along the north side of Lot 11,Block 1 between the townhomes and commercial lot;the easements should grant access to all lots within the subdivision. i. All drive aisles/private streets shall be posted as fire lanes with no parking allowed as set forth in UDC 11-317-413.2d. In addition,if a curb exists next to the drive aisle,it shall be painted red. j. Depict an in regress easement across Lots 2 and 3,Block 1 rig access to all lots in the subdivision. 3. The landscape plan,included in Section VII.D, shall be revised as follows prior to submittal of the Final Plat application: a. All pedestrian crossings that cross the private street and any drive aisle shall be depicted with brick pavers, stamped concrete, or equal, as outlined in UDC 11-3A-19B.4.b and per requirement of the development agreement. b. Include details that demonstrate compliance with the Quality of Life amenity standards for the dog park and dog waste stations in UDC 11-3G-4C; and with the Recreation Activity Area amenity standards for the tot lot in UDC 11-3G-4D. Page 36 c. Clearly depict and label the irrigation district easements for the Kellogg Drain and the Creason Lateral; ensure no trees are placed in these easements. If easements prevent compliance with UDC landscape standards, alternative compliance may be requested to the standard. d. Demonstrate how the arterial street buffers comply with the enhanced buffer requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.3 and 11-313-7C.3f;make revisions as necessary to comply with these standards. e. Stormwater swales shall be landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-3B-11C.Note: Gravel, rock, sand, or cobble stormwater facilities are not permitted on the surface of required landscape areas, unless designed as a dry creek bed or other design feature. f. Depict landscaping within the street buffers along Linder and Ustick Roads per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C.3e,which require lawn and other grasses requiring regular mowing to comprise no more than 65%of the vegetated coverage of the buffer; all other vegetated coverage shall be mulched and treated as planting area for shrubs or other vegetative cover. g. Revise the calculations table to reflect a minimum of one(1)deciduous shade tree in common open space areas for every 5,000(instead of 8,000) square feet of area in accord with UDC 11-3G-5B.3 to comply with the current standard. h. Depict a dense 25-foot wide landscape buffer to residential uses entirely on the C-C zoned property; or, split between the C-C and R-15 zoned properties,with dense landscaping consisting of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover that allows trees to touch within five(5)years of planting as set forth in UDC 11-313-9C. 4. Future development shall comply with the minimum dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-7 for the R-15 zoning district and UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-C zoning district. 5. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval. 6. The plaza in the residential portion of the development shall have lighting in conformance with UDC 11-3A-I I and landscaping in accord with UDC 11-313,per UDC 11-3G-3B.Id. Details that demonstrate compliance shall be submitted with the final plat application. 7. A revised common driveway exhibit shall be submitted with the final plat application that reflects the revisions to the plat noted above. 8. A floodplain development permit shall be required prior to any site work occurring on the property. 9. All fencing shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. 10. Provide a pressurized irrigation system consistent with the standards as set forth in UDC I I- 3A-15,UDC 11-3B-6 and MCC 9-1-28. 11. The subdivision shall be constructed in one(1)phase of development as proposed with this application. 12. Upon completion of the landscape installation, a written Certificate of Completion shall be submitted to the Planning Division verifying all landscape improvements are in substantial compliance with the approved landscape plan as set forth in UDC 11-313-14. Page 37 13. The applicant and/or assigns shall comply with the private street standards as set forth in UDC 11-3F-3 and 11-3F-4 and shall obtain final approval of said private streets within one(1)year of approval of the preliminary plat. 14. The maintenance agreement for the private streets shall be amended to include proportionate cost-share for maintenance of the private streets between all lots within the subdivision. 15. Business hours of operation within the C-C zoning district shall be limited from 6 am to 11 pm as set forth in UDC 11-2B-3A.4,unless otherwise approved through a conditional use permit. 16. All existing structures shall be removed prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat for this property. 17. Upon eemplefien of the 6-ndseape installation, a written Gei4ifie4e of Completion shal s4mitted to the Planning Division verifying all land iments are in substantial cempli-anee with the approved landseapelan as set fertL in 1-1-lC 11 1-3B 14.Duplicate condition. 18. Any drive-thru establishment use shall require Conditional Use Permit approval in accord with UDC 11-4-3-11. 19. A conditional use permit shall be submitted for approval of the multi-family residential development on Lot 2,Block 1 prior to submittal of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Administrative Design Review application. Compliance with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27—Multi-family Development is required. 20. The Applicant shall submit an application for Administrative Design Review(DES) for the attached single-family and townhome units prior to building permit submittal. 21. The Applicant shall submit an application for Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Administrative Design Review(DES)for the future commercial buildings and multi-family structures prior to building permit submittal. 22. The preliminary plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1) obtain the City Engineer signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved findings; or 2)obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-6B-7. To access other City and Agency comments and conditions,please copy and paste the following link in your browser: https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=367302&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City IX. FINDINGS A. Preliminary Plat Findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; The Commission finds that the proposed plat, with Staffs recommendations, is in substantial compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan regarding land use, density, transportation, and pedestrian connectivity. (Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies in, Section V of this report for more information) Page 38 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds that public services will be provided to the subject property with development. (See Section VIII of the Staff Report for more details from public service providers) 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's capital improvement program; Because City water and sewer and any other utilities will be provided by the development at their own cost, the Commission finds that the subdivision will not require the expenditure of capital improvement funds. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development based upon comments from the public service providers (i.e., Police, Fire, ACHD, etc). (See Section VII for more information) 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and, The Commission is not aware of any health, safety, or environmental problems associated with the platting of this property.ACHD considers road safety issues in their analysis and has approved the proposed road layout and connections to adjacent arterials. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic, or historic features that exist on this site that require preserving. D. Private Street Findings: In order to approve the application,the director shall find the following: 1. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this article; The Director finds that the design of the proposed private streets complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. 2. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property,or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds that the proposed private streets would not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity if all conditions of approval are met. 3. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the comprehensive plan and/or the regional transportation plan.(Ord. 05-1170,8-30-2005,eff.9-15-2005) The Director finds the use and location of the private streets do not conflict with the comprehensive plan or the regional transportation plan because the proposed design meets all UDC standards, and the project is also extending the required public streets through the site. 4. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or gated development. (Ord. 10-1463, 11-3-2010,eff. 11-8-2010) Page 39 The Director finds the proposed residential development is a mew development by having a majority of the units facing green space instead of the adjacent streets. Page 40