Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-01-07 Regular City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, January 07, 2025 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilwoman Liz Strader Councilman Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison ABSENT Councilman John Overton PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted PROCLAMATIONS \[Action Item\] 1. National Mentoring Month Proclamation PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Pollard North (H-2024-0037) by Brighton Corporation, generally located approximately 1/4 mile north of W. Chinden Blvd. at the north end of N. Levi Ave. on the north side of W. Waverton Dr. Continued to January 14, 2025 A. Request: Rezone of 21.95 acres of land from the R-8 to the TN-R zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat for 177 building lots and 26 common lots on 19.76 acres of land in the TN-R zoning district for Pollard North Subdivision. C. Request: Modified Development Agreement (Inst.#2019-060655) for a new agreement for the residential portion of the development with an updated conceptual development plan. Motion to continue to January 14, 2025 made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 3. Public Hearing for Foldesi Reserve (H-2024-0055) by Jeff Hatch, located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0055 A. Request: Annexation of 3.31 acres of land for the construction of approximately 46,000 sq. ft. of flex space in the I-L zoning district. Motion to approve made by Councilman Cavener, Seconded by Councilman Taylor. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener 4. Public Hearing for 330 N. Linder Rd. (H-2024-0048) by Nicholas Rinker, located at 330 N. Linder Rd. Continued to January 21, 2025 Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0048 A. Request: Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district to operate a Vehicle Sale or Rental and Service Facility. Motion to continue to January 21, 2025 made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilwoman Little Roberts. Voting Yea: Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader, Councilman Cavener Abstaining: Councilman Taylor FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 7:10 PM Meridian City Council January 7, 2025. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, January 7, 2025, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Members Absent: John Overton. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Bill Parsons, Nick Napoli, Jeff Brown, Steve Taulbee and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock _X_Anne Little Roberts John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is January 7th, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. We will begin tonight's regular City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next item up is the Pledge of Allegiance. I will turn this over to Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks, Mr. Mayor. Just a quick moment. We have got some good muscle memory to stand up for the pledge, but earlier today I had the chance to meet with James Vanderveen. James is a freshman at the Gem Prep Virtual Academy. He is also in the scouts. I believe he is in the same troop as Council Member Strader's son, so that's -- that's a nice coincidence. James has generously offered to lead us in the pledge. So, James, we will invite you up and give you an opportunity to help lead us in the pledge this evening. Vanderveen: Please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) Cavener: James, thanks. You are welcome anytime to lead us in the pledge. That's about the best lead we have had in a long time. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. COMMUNITY INVOCATION Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 2 of 26 Simison: Thank you, Councilman Cavener. Next up will be our community invocation, which tonight will be delivered by Pastor Doug Connelly, who recently -- most recent groundbreaking ceremony held in the city for a future community member just trying not to say Stonehill's new church, but congratulations on that. Thank you for being here and for those in the audience, please, join us in the community invocation or take this as a moment of silence and reflection. Connelly: Lord God, we are so grateful to just be here tonight and we come to you just thankful and with a thankful heart and so many things to be grateful for, Lord. Grateful for life. We are grateful to have an opportunity to have a relationship with you. We are grateful for family, for friends, for neighbors and we are also grateful for this amazing city, Lord, and I pray for all of the leaders of our city, whether they are here tonight or at other places, we -- we -- we pray for the leaders that are here tonight. We pray for our Mayor. We ask that you, God, you would give him guidance and wisdom as he -- as he leads our city and along with the City Council and -- and, Lord, these men and the women that are here and making decisions, I just pray that you would be with them, Lord. We -- we lift up our first responders and, Lord, just as they serve our city and they put their life sometimes on the line, so that we can be safe and protected and we just appreciate that and grateful for that and so I ask for -- tonight that you would just give these -- these men and women, Lord, guidance and wisdom as they -- as they make decisions, Lord, and, Lord, these decisions, Lord, shape many people's lives and -- and livelihood and so we just pray that you would help them and guide them and give them the -- the integrity and the wherewithal, the fortitude, Lord, the -- just all the things that are needed to make these decisions, Lord, for the city and pray that you would give them -- give them that, whether it's a big decision, small decision, Lord, easy, complicated, Lord, that it would all just -- just be from you tonight. Lord, we ask for the protection over the city and, Lord, just as -- as a world that we live in now can be crazy and chaotic, Lord, I just pray that you would help us, Lord, as a city to keep -- continue to keep our citizens safe and, Lord, just do all the things that need to be done for that and just helping that, Lord, and I pray for the members of the community as well, Lord, all of us who live here, that work here, that you would help us not just to sit by and maybe even at times complain about things, but we would just get in and help and just be active and involved in -- in this wonderful amazing community. So, I just pray for tonight, Lord, just be the night that you want it to be. We love you and we thank you in Jesus' name, amen. Thank you, guys. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: With that we will move on to adoption of the agenda. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I'm going to move that we adopt the agenda as presented, with maybe just a note, which is that Item 2, which is an annexation for Pollard North, has requested Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 3 of 26 continuance to January 14th. I believe there is an issue with the sign posting and I think the applicant needs to do a couple additional pieces of due diligence before they are before us. I don't know if anybody is here to testify on that, but, Council, will at least take up that item when it's before us here shortly. With that, Mr. Mayor, I move we adopt the agenda as presented. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt agenda as presented. Is there any discussion? If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Those opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. PROCLAMATIONS [Action Item] 1. National Mentoring Month Proclamation Simison: The first item up is going to be a proclamation for National Mentoring Month. If I could have Hillary and the team join me at the podium. We are quite fancy here. So, Council, tonight -- tonight seems like a night of friends in a lot of ways based upon the way things are going with Stonehill and others, but as was mentioned this is -- we will talk about the month in a second, but National Mentoring Month and just for the record I am a member of the Big Brothers Big Sisters board of Idaho and so it's -- it's great to have you here in the city and so I will go ahead and do the proclamation and turn it over to you for some comments. Whereas Big Brothers Big Sisters of Idaho has been a dedicated advocate for the youth of Meridian for 45 years providing one-to-one mentoring relationships that help young people overcome challenges and reach their full potential and whereas the mentors, known as bigs, give their time, energy and heart to guide, support and encourage the children they mentor, fostering self-confidence, academic success and emotional well being and whereas through mentorship Big Brothers Big Sisters has positively impacted the lives of countless youth in Meridian, helping to empower youth to overcome adversity, experience positive relationships and become more resilient individuals and whereas National Mentoring Month is an opportunity to recognize and celebrate the invaluable role that mentors play in shaping the future of our youth and to encourage more members of our community to become involved in mentoring through Big Brothers Big Sisters and whereas the City of Meridian joins in this national effort to support Big Brothers Big Sisters of Idaho to encourage mentoring to help our community thrive. Therefore, I, Mayor Robert E. Simison, hereby proclaim January 2025 as National Mentoring Month in the City of Meridian and call upon the citizens to join Big Brothers Big Sisters of Idaho in the pursuit of improving the lives of young people in our community through mentoring, today the 7th day of January 2025. So, thank you for all that you all do to help keep this wonderful organization moving forward here in Idaho, not just the Treasure Valley, but as we look to continue to make that happen and with that I will turn it over to Hillary for any comments you would like. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 4 of 26 Xoumanivong: Well, I just want to say thank you to Mayor Simison and the Meridian City Council and the entire City of Meridian for supporting Big Brothers Big Sisters. As the proclamation mentioned we have been serving Idaho for 45 years and we are so excited to have the opportunity to set a foundation that will continue our organization for another 45 years and beyond. January is National Mentoring Month across the nation and this is a time where we just celebrate all that mentoring does for our youth and even for the bigs and adults that are involved in our program. In the midst of a youth mental health crisis mentorship helps support youth and it reduces depressive symptoms, it reduces the number of risky behaviors our youth are participating in, it improves self- confidence and it's a really important thing just not for our youth, but for our community as a whole and so we are grateful for this opportunity and we are grateful for this proclamation that will help us recruit more bigs, recruit more funds and ensure that we are here to serve the community for many many years to come. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics ACTION ITEMS 2. Public Hearing for Pollard North (H-2024-0037) by Brighton Corporation, generally located approximately 1/4 mile north of W. Chinden Blvd. at the north end of N. Levi Ave. on the north side of W. Waverton Dr. A. Request: Rezone of 21.95 acres of land from the R-8 to the TN-R zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat for 177 building lots and 26 common lots on 19.76 acres of land in the TN-R zoning district for Pollard North Subdivision. C. Request: Modified Development Agreement (Inst.#2019-060655) for a new agreement for the residential portion of the development with an updated conceptual development plan. Simison: Thank you. And you guys are free to stay as long as you want, but don't feel obligated. With that we will move on to Item 2, public hearing for Pollard North, H-2024- 0037. Since it wasn't posted properly we are not opening this, we are just going to continue. That is correct? Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. And I hope if there is anyone that's here to testify on this that they would be able to join us at the meeting when it's been properly noticed. Just maybe just a quick question for -- for staff. The note that I have is that you need some time to review. Do we need additional time than a week? Do you guys have everything you need -- I guess I'm just trying to understand if this is a result of merely the sign placement error or if you guys need additional time to be able to review things before next week. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 5 of 26 Parsons: Mayor, Members of the Council, I think this is adequate time. I think there is a couple things happening. One, the same applicant has another application in front of you next week, so they want to marry this one up with that particular project and, then, also the notification. But we have received the revised plans and those are to the clerk and on the website. So, Sonya can do a quick memo when she returns to the office and get that to you in a timely manner and should be able to hear it next week. Cavener: So, Mr. Mayor, maybe a quick question for our clerk or legal. We have sent postcards to neighbors on this particular one noticing for tonight. So, will we renotice as well for the 14th given the short turn around? Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Cavener, we wouldn't send new notices, but they would put the sign up and by continuing it from this meeting where it was noticed that is adequate from a noticing standpoint. Cavener: Okay. That's good enough for me then. So, Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I move that we are going to continue Item 2, this application, H-2024-0037, to January 14th, 2025. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to continue Item 2 to January 14th, 2025. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the item is continued. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 3. Public Hearing for Foldesi Reserve (H-2024-0055) by Jeff Hatch, located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. A. Request: Annexation of 3.31 acres of land for the construction of approximately 46,000 sq. ft. of flex space in the I-L zoning district. Simison: With that we will move on to Item 3, public hearing for Foldesi Reserve, H- 2024-0055. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Napoli: Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council. So, the next item on the agenda is the annexation for Foldesi Reserve. The applicant is requesting annexation of 3.31 acres of land for the construction of approximately 46,005 square feet of industrial space in the I-L zoning district. The site is located at 3915 North Ten Mile Road. As shown on the screen the current zoning is RUT in Ada county and the FLUM designation is mixed use nonresidential. The current use of the property is residential with several existing buildings on the property. All the structures will be Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 6 of 26 removed and the existing well and septic systems will be abandoned as required. The applicant has indicated the proposed use for the site are industrial buildings for industrial users. Any permitted and conditional uses will be allowed to occupy these spaces and will be determined with the building permit applications at a later date. The use of industrial buildings aligns with the mixed use nonresidential future land use designation, which accommodate -- accommodates a range of commercial and industrial users. Access is proposed off of North Ten Mile Road through a single curb cut. The applicant has condensed the three access points to North Ten Mile Road into a single access point in the center of the property. Additionally, cross-access shall be stubbed to the property to the north and south, which the applicant has revised their plan and has -- has complied with. The applicant has chosen to incorporate the water conserving design standards along the landscape buffer along Ten Mile, which reduces the buffer by 50 percent. The concept plan shows a 12 and a half foot buffer meeting this requirement and the landscaping will be analyzed with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. Developer is proposing three industrial buildings with a mix of one and two story tenant spaces comprised of stucco, brick veneer, stucco wainscot, metal panels, metal panel roofing with moderate to large setbacks from the street and frontages exceeding the 20 percent windows. Staff and the Commission are recommending approval and have received written testimony from Robbie Foldesi in opposition of the project and I will stand for questions at this time. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thanks for presenting the application and I guess my question is about that last piece that you touched on. I see the note. I read the letter that we got yesterday and the claim. It sounds like you have done that verification. I just think it would be beneficial for me and maybe the Council -- when -- when an application comes in for a request to annexation what are the steps staff takes to verify that the person making the request is actually the landowner? Napoli: Mr. Mayor, Council President Cavener, that's a great question. So, as far as with that we get the deed -- the warranty deed for the property and we do get an affidavit of legal interest if it is not the owner that's applying for the application. So, confirm that the owner is on the deed and has signed the affidavit saying that they are giving permission to this applicant to apply. I also do go to the Ada County Assessor's website to see who the primary and secondary owner are. In this case this application had everything that checked out. After discussing with the applicant in the last 24 hours, after we received that e-mail, I did receive documentation that confirms that we are able to move forward with this and I think if you guys are curious to see that documentation I do know that they have it with them tonight. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, a couple follow-ups. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 7 of 26 Cavener: Nick, I assume once you get all that clarification do you, then, close the loop back with the public testimony, as -- as the -- the person who sent us that information, have we let them know that -- the efforts that you have taken to verify that this is a legal request that's before us tonight? Napoli: Mr. Mayor, yeah. Council Member Cavener, that's correct. I did follow up with him this morning in an e-mail stating that, you know, he is welcome to come to the hearing and explain his side of the story, but we have received adequate documentation from -- our legal department said was adequate as well -- to say we can move forward with this application and it will be heard tonight, yes. Cavener: Great. And, Mr. Mayor, just one more to help close the loop in my curiosity for Mr. Nary. Got two parties that maybe have a dispute about who does and doesn't own the land. Does that have -- does that have any potential impact on a decision that the Council were to make tonight? Meaning if the person who has contacted the city is correct and they do own the land, that is settled in court, does that, then, undermine the decision that the Council makes tonight if we make one at all? Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, Council Member Cavener, I mean it's a great question. Generally, no. The information that we have, again, shows this is the titled owner of the property and so we are acting on basically the information that is provided by the county as to who the owner is. Certainly if there is a dispute over ownership or the rights that might exist because of some other -- some other interest, certainly we are not aware of it and so we can't act on anything other than that. If something were to come of it I guess a court could address that and the circumstances that exist in that and whether it would be de-annexing the property or something else I couldn't tell you. At least at this juncture we don't have any reason not to move forward if the Council wishes to do that. Cavener: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Mayor, Council, thanks. I think it's the first time in my 11 years doing this that I have had this type of request, so part of this is the process. It's also a little bit of curiosity about what would happen. So, Nick, I appreciate you giving me some better education on that. Mr. Mayor, that concludes my questions. Thank you. Simison: Thank you, Councilman Cavener. Council, any additional questions for staff? Okay. Is the applicant here? If you would like to come forward, be recognized for 15 minutes. Hatch: Jeff Hatch with Hatch Design Architecture. Our address is 200 West 36th Street, Boise, Idaho. 83714. Good evening, Mayor Simison and Council Members. Thank you for your consideration of our annexation application this evening. Mr. Foldesi, who owned this property, passed away relatively recently, but he was originally from Hungary and moved here and bought this property and was a fairly avid gardener and horticultural ist. He actually brought a walnut -- a native walnut tree from Hungary over here and planted it on this property and so part of what we were doing when we Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 8 of 26 were thinking of a name for the property was trying to determine -- you kind of -- you have a unique remnant enclave parcel wrapped around mini storages essentially. So, you have a reserve essentially and so when we are looking at a name -- looking at the owner's name and understanding what it means, which is a strong connection with land and nature, which is what he was kind of an avid fan of, but also it seemed to be very fitting, because the name means a sense of belonging to a specific place, like a reserve and so that's really where we came up with that name. Staff did a great job at going over our proposal as far as the annexation and the zoning, which we think is complementary to the area, but also we have a lot of residential to the east of us and around that area density wise and we got plenty of storage units. So, having a range of I-L businesses in this area to complement that was something that we felt was a need and was complimentary at our neighborhood meeting. As far as the land use map we are complimentary to that as well and just kind of recapping the site plan, a couple brief items that have changed since our Planning and Zoning meeting that we wanted to continue to refine for City Council. You will see item number one, a proposed pedestrian pathway that goes from the public right of way all the way through the site. That was something that we didn't previously have. So, we are able to adjust the site plan in order to accommodate more pedestrian access into and within the development. We also discussed with the neighbor to the south and north and ended up adjusting the location of our proposed cross-access for future access to the south, shifting our trash enclosure to accommodate a more logical location for our frontage road or some connectivity in the future versus where we previously had it and, then, lastly you can kind of see -- it does -- right by the entry curb cut -- there we go. We ended up incorporating some pavers into that area, so when you -- when you come off of Ten Mile you will have a little bit of sound and you will have kind of a sense of entrance into this space, both -- both from a safety standpoint, but also from an esthetic standpoint. Again, taking the I-L zone and elevating this space in this area. Here is a couple concept renderings from the entry coming into the development and, then, looking at one of the buildings and the side. So, a mix of stucco and metal and brick and, ultimately, we are wanting industrial uses of the L-O, but also trying to, you know, celebrate the -- some of the last pieces of land we have in Meridian off Ten Mile and make something that is a lasting legacy for the current owner, as well as the previous owner, but also something that is going to be very helpful and useful for Meridian for years to come. And I will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Hatch, nice seeing you. Appreciate the application. Just a -- more of a general question to help me understand and because it -- I had a meeting with a good scout today and we talked a lot about traffic on Ten Mile. That was one of his concerns. So, talk to me a little bit about the traffic that this product is going to generate on a -- on a daily level. Is it five cars, ten cars, 50 cars? What -- what are you anticipating the Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 9 of 26 kind of -- the traffic count is going to be for this particular project? Recognize it's largely small. Hatch: Yeah. So, great question, Council Member Cavener. The simple answer is we don't know, because these are speculative buildings and so we are saying anything in the I-L that we can justify. So, we will build the shells. People will come in with their businesses and say I want to be a general contractor and I want to have a little warehouse for my -- my tools, but primarily it's an office. In that case you have a relatively low use and based on the parking we are slightly over parked for the site for I- L. But the traffic generated from that will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis both from the city standpoint, as well as ACHD to determine if a traffic impact study is required or if any additional improvements would need to be made. We are proposing the widest access that ACHD allows to accommodate for larger vehicular traffic, which typically wouldn't have a lot of vehicular traffic on a daily basis. So, we are anticipating not high volumes of traffic, like a restaurant or drive-through. We are not proposing any drive-throughs, so -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor, one additional if I may. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Mr. Hatch, talk to me about how -- should you receive annexation how quickly would you anticipate occupancy of these buildings? Hatch: Oh, if we could do it in ten days from now I think that would be fantastic. So, as quickly as realistically possible. We want to make sure that we balance the site and we are addressing ACHD's concerns through their review, as well as the building department's review. But we -- we plan on proceeding with construction documents, immediately submitting for design review and CZC promptly and proceeding with construction as soon as realistically possible. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, maybe some more. Simison: Mr. Cavener. Cavener: I think probably what I'm getting at is anybody drives on Ten Mile, everyone feels that one car is one car too many on Ten Mile. Recognizing we are seeing the soon-to-be-open Highway 16, 1 guess maybe the better question is where does your project lie in the timeline of the Highway 16 expansion being opened? Hatch: Well, I'm not a general contractor for ITD for that project. Cavener: Sure. Hatch: I have no control over their schedule, but realistically, you know, a CZC probably takes three'ish months, maybe a little quicker, maybe a little longer, so that would put us Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 10 of 26 into April, May. We do permits shortly thereafter and get, you know, permits mid- summer. So, construction takes possibly a year. Just speculating. But I think sometime next spring slash summer would be a realistic time for opening businesses. Cavener: Okay. Hatch: If we can go quicker we would love to. Simison: Sure. Hatch: We are excited to work with the city to try to make that happen. Cavener: Great. Thank you, Mr. Hatch. Appreciate it. Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Hi. Thanks for being here. Can you, please, talk a little bit more about the type of end users or tenants that you would expect in this site? This is a smaller industrial site, so I feel like your target market is a little bit -- excuse me -- it's a little bit different. So, just kind of curious. You kind gave an example of a general contractor. thought that was interesting. What other types of users generally would you expect to see here? Hatch: Well, I mean the -- as you see from the elevations it's an elevated use, but the I- L has a range of different uses, so you may get other subcontractors or approved uses in that I-L zone that are justified both from a traffic and use standpoint. So, we anticipate there may be some that have conditional uses and others that are approved outright and we will just kind of take those on a case-by-case basis, so -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: You are not obligated to tell us your business plan, but it was more of a curiosity. I do have to say it is -- from an esthetic perspective it is one of the nicer looking industrial developments in terms of the renderings that we have seen and I would like to compliment you on that. Hatch: Thank you, Commissioner Strader. I'm the architect, so that -- that is my business. The occupying of the buildings -- we are trying to specify the use and be very specific about maintaining the intent of the I-L. Simison: Council, any additional questions for the applicant? Okay. Thank you very much. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 11 of 26 Hatch: Thank you. Simison: Mr. Clerk, do we have anybody signed up on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we did not. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present or -- in the room or online who would like to provide testimony on this item? And if you are online you can use the raise your hand feature. Seeing no one online raising their hand and no one coming forward, would the applicant like to make any final comments at this time? Sherburne: My name is Jared Sherburne and I'm the developer for the project. My address is 1456 East Iron Eagle Drive in Eagle. Mayor Simison, City Council Members, thank you for your time this evening. First of all I'm very honored and excited about this project, what -- what we have worked on designing and what we are bringing to the community and I just wanted to thank the city -- the City of Meridian has been fantastic to work with and side buffering this development online. So, to kind of answer your question, we are going to bring -- the end user would likely be whatever the market gives us is the real answer. That's why it's hard to tell who the end user will really be, so -- I hope that answers that question. Anyway, just wanted to thank you guys. Appreciate it. Simison: Council, any questions? All right. Thank you very much. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Nobody else has any other questions, I move that we close the public hearing on Item No. 3. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: We talk oftentimes how hard in-fill is and I know this is kind of quasi-in-fill, but I'm going to give the applicant credit. It is in-fill and probably the record for the fastest Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 12 of 26 hearing for an in-fill project. I think this is a pretty cut and dry request. I agree with Council Member Strader, the -- the renderings are great. It's going to be a nice addition to Ten Mile. I'm satisfied with the timeline that it will have minimal, if any, impact on -- on Ten Mile given the Highway 16 expansion. So, with that, Mr. Mayor, I move that we approve Item 3, Foldesi, Reserve application H-2024-0055, include all staff and applicant testimony. Taylor: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Item H-2024-0055. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, absent; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Good luck and thank you. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. 4. Public Hearing for 330 N. Linder Rd. (H-2024-0048) by Nicholas Rinker, located at 330 N. Linder Rd. A. Request: Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district to operate a Vehicle Sale or Rental and Service Facility. Simison: Next item up, Item 4, public hearing for H-2024-0048. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Napoli: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, next item on the agenda is the annexation for 330 North Linder Road. The applicant is requesting annexation of one acre of land for the proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service. The site is located at 330 North Linder Road and I show on the screen the current zoning is R-1 in Ada county and the FLUM designation is general industrial. The subject property is part of an enclave -- enclave area surrounded by city annexed property. Annexation of this property will provide more efficient provisions of city services. Industrial uses exist to the west across North Linder and to the south and east. Single family residence in -- in Ada county is present to the north. However, they do run a business out of that residence in Ada county. This property is designated as general industrial on the FLUM designation. The use of vehicle sales or rental and service is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is listed as a permitted use in the industrial -- I-L designation. The existing residence is proposed to remain as the main office for the vehicle sales business. The building shall abandon well and septic and connect to city services at the time of annexation in accord with the UDC. Additionally, the current structure proposed to remain will be nonconforming to the 35 foot street setback required if approved in I-L zoning. Any future development will require compliance with this 35 foot setback. The Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 13 of 26 applicant is requesting Council waiver to reduce the 25 foot landscape buffer adjacent to the residents to the north. They have received a written document from the property owners from the north in support of this reduction from 25 to five feet. The applicant is proposing water wise landscaping, which allows you to reduce 50 percent in street section buffers. So, a 12 and a half foot wide street buffer along Linder shall be constructed. One drive -- one full driveway access exists to this site via Linder Road. However, this is proposed to be eliminated and the applicant will share access with the property to the south through a cross-access agreement. There is the existing site on Linder Road. And staff is recommending two changes to the DA provisions in the staff report. After the Planning and Zoning Commission we worked with the applicant to revise some of -- some concerns they had with some of our provisions and the first one is really -- so, ITD requires five vehicle display areas for a retail car sales. So, we are proposing to change that from three to five essentially, so they can be in compliance and get their retail car sales license through ITD. And, additionally, the applicant was not in favor of the cross-access being required to the property to the north. Staff is still going to require the access, but we are going to require an easement at this time instead of a stub and when the property does redevelop as anything other than a vehicle sales or rental and service use, that's when we will require the stub to actually be in place. That's just something for you guys to view and see if you want to adopt those changes. It's not necessarily the proposed change that staff worked with the applicant on to find a compromise and really staff and commission are recommending approval and have not received any written testimony on this project and I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for staff? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Cavener: Yeah. It's very unusual for us not to require a stub. You know, cross-access is really important. It's really something hard to achieve if we do not get it up front. I'm just curious if you can provide a little more context why you felt like in this instance a compromise was warranted? Napoli: Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, yeah. So, as far as with that -- because of the use it's really -- it's a vehicle rental use and really he was concerned with security to his site. As far as not having people driving through his car lot is really his main concern. If that property to the north were to redevelop they would essentially be able to access that stub and drive through it at any time and his main concern was the safety of his cars and his lot and the security of that. You know, in talking with Bill and some other people here in the planning department, we have in the past done similar circumstances where, you know, for certain uses we will allow there to be an easement instead of a stub at this time and, then, when the property does redevelop is when we will require that stub. So, with the concerns over his safety or the -- the safety of his Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 14 of 26 product and the use that he is proposing, we felt that it was appropriate not to have another use driving through the middle of a rental lot essentially. Strader: Mr. Mayor, follow up. Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: So, yeah, I'm tracking with -- with where you are going there. But how -- how do we track internally a DA provision like this to ensure that if there was redevelopment that this would be flagged for us? We have sometimes enforcement issues with conditions in our development agreements. So, I just want to understand just from a practical -- like nuts and bolts perspective how will you all track when that occurs? Napoli: Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, so as far as -- that's a great question. You know, as far as -- it will be in the development agreement and whenever a property does redevelop we do look at those development agreements to ensure that any existing provisions such as this would be met. You know, you are correct that sometimes those aren't always caught or they do sometimes lead to errors. That is -- that is true and maybe Bill can speak to a better way of us tracking it, but -- Parsons: There is always a better way. So, Mayor, Members of the Council, what we have been doing lately and trying to do is leverage our GIS mapping a little bit better. So, whenever we get a recorded cross-access agreement we actually put a cross-hatch on that particular property, so that when something comes up near -- next to it in the future we can look at that and we call it a tagged layers -- a tag property layer that we have in our GIS and that way we can see that it's highlighted. We can click on that and say, oh, what is this? It will reference a cross-access agreement and, then, we can research that and dig into that development agreement and see what occurred at the time and why that driveway was -- was either constructed or not constructed. Certainly as -- as Nick pointed out this evening, it is a recommended change. So, again, if Council doesn't feel comfortable with that you are certainly within your purview to require it to be constructed at this time. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I think that's fantastic that you are leveraging technology in that way. That just seems like a really practical, really common sense way of going about it. So, thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions for staff? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 15 of 26 Taylor: Not a question, but I just want to make a note. I do want to recuse myself from the vote, because I have a personal relationship with the applicant. Simison: Thank you very much. All right. Then would the applicant like to come forward? Wilke: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Councilmen. Staff. Thank you for your time tonight. My name is Matt Wilke and I'm here to represent Nick Rinker, Rinker Properties, LLC. I'm out of Middleton, Idaho. P.O. Box 7. And with White Barn Ventures is my company. So, thank you for your time here tonight. Staff really nailed this on the head that we agree with all the changes and the staff report. Like I said, we located this property, it was -- it is R-1 currently. So, we are asking to annex and rezone this in for light industrial for his car lot. He -- he is just a destination business mostly. He is staging rental cars from this location, so there is not a lot of traffic. It's just when he gets a call for a rental they will deliver to the Boise airport and he has some use to maintain some vehicles from time to time on the site and keep his inventory maintained and, then, other than that the cross-access easement -- we agree with staff there that -- may listen to our client's concerns of security and it is quite a bit of concern. He does have some pretty nice vehicles from time to time that he rents out there. They are kind of specialty use. So, in the future if it did develop out he understands. If there was a different use or most likely need to be that cross-access put in place and he is happy to record that easement there in the meantime. Simison: Thank you. Council, questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you. I'm curious is -- is your client willing to help, you know, put funds aside for the construction of the cross-access at a later time? And kind of where I'm going with it is, you know, for the part that's on this property there is just the easement, but there is no funding behind the actual, you know, cross-access and so that would put the burden of the entirety of the cross-access like constructing it onto the adjacent property owner. So, I just want to understand how you are thinking about that. Wilke: Yes. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader. This site is interesting. So, on the south side we have cross-access already. We are using the neighbor's access for -- for shared access, because he is on a principal arterial there on Linder. The north side it gains quite a bit elevation there. The neighbor actually has a concrete wall there abutting the property. So, it's -- as far as the expense side goes I think the northern neighbor will -- would incur more expense to develop their property than my client would on the south side. I think just allowing that cross-access for his property to develop in the future is going to be a huge improvement for future access. But I don't see that he really has a lot of site prep to do to improve that access in the future. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 16 of 26 Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: But unless I'm misunderstanding, your client is not intending to construct the stub street. Wilke: Correct. Strader: So, how much would the stub -- stub street be -- is what I'm trying to figure out on your side -- on your own property. Wilke: Understood. Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, at this point it's kind of unknown. His property is going to be mostly just a parking lot or most likely there would be a cross-access put in. So, I don't think it would be much different than they have currently planned for the site. I don't really know what -- what the plan in the future would hold there, whether or not the neighbor to the north is going to be required to come through this property prior to this property to building up to another use in the future long term planning. But at this point there -- it's just pretty much a parking lot and an office building up front for the rental business. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Sorry. Just to get maybe more specific. So, I understand -- so there is a parking lot and I'm -- and what I'm trying to figure out is where the cross-access will go. What would be involved there? So, I guess -- I guess what I'm wondering is why you wouldn't just go ahead and construct the stub street knowing there really shouldn't be an issue, because the neighbor to the north has that wall that's not redeveloping yet. So, it's not like someone would be accessing the site and I'm just -- where I'm going with it is I -- if it's not a huge burden in terms of the cost, I'm wondering why we wouldn't just have you construct the stub street now knowing it wouldn't be functional, as opposed to later. If the property to the north redevelops it's going to be extremely difficult to get your client to make the improvements on their own property if it's in a landscape buffer or something else. So, that's the piece I was trying to figure out. Wilke: Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, I don't think it's going to be that difficult. Right now I think they would have to leave a hole in the fence, unless you would be allowed to leave that up and it probably wouldn't be much different than the easement he has in place, because there is only a five foot landscape buffer required there now. So, I don't think there is going to be a big infrastructure project in the future to put a stub there. Right now the property width is fairly narrow as it is, so there is not really going to be a stub -- stub street per se, it might just be like a spot in the fence -- Strader: Yeah. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 17 of 26 Wilke: -- so, I don't really -- Strader: Okay. Wilke: -- think it really has room to put a stub street in as it -- as the site plan shows right now. Maybe just a line on the fence maybe where it would go. Strader: Okay. I will mull that over. Thank you. Wilke: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Appreciate kind of the application. I have got some similar questions really about the cross-access agreement. Are you planning to have like a barrier or a -- a gate to prevent people from accessing this site when it's not being operated? I mean is that the intention? Is that -- Wilke: At this point it would be ideal to have a gate there. Whether or not he is going to be allowed to do that on the southern access I don't think he is -- he is -- he was supposed to be here. He is stuck in -- he just landed in Boise, but he is a day late. He got stuck in the airport, so -- he is on his way, but he is late. But I don't think that there was any plans for a gate there. It would be ideal if he could for clarity. But at this point I think the access is going to be through the southern neighbor there on the -- up Linder. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I think that's my point. You have -- you have got a cross-access agreement to the south that you are using to access and that one's okay; right? Because that -- that lets you get access, but now you are saying, hey, the neighbor to the north, they shouldn't be afforded the same opportunity that you have got and that -- I guess that's the part that I'm struggling to wrap my head around and I hear security, but to that point if -- if some -- let's hope nobody's nefarious. We have got the best police department in the country. They -- they are proactive with their policing. But if somebody is wanting to be nefarious they are going to access that -- that site to do something terrible off of Linder, they are not going to access it through a cross-access agreement. So, that's the part that I'm struggling with. To my good colleague's point, we -- it's very rare that these cross-access agreements come in much after the fact. Like this is kind of the bite of the apple and so I just -- I'm really struggling to find a basis to grant the request that's -- that's coming from you and staff. I think the original request within the staff report, at least for me right now where I'm most comfortable, I'm just trying to understand what the -- the compelling reason is and I just got to be honest, the safety element is not Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 18 of 26 necessarily resonating with me, because you rely on a cross-access to the south to be able to get into your property. Wilke: Agreed. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Cavener, I hear your concerns and understand, but one extra access that's opened up before the northern site develops is just another access point for a security problem where on the south side he has got the ability to have cameras and that kind of thing and protect his access a little bit better and sharing it with the neighbor -- it's not necessarily a cross-through access at that point. They have to come in and come back out that access. So, their -- their plan for the site was when that northern site does develop, then, they have that access easement in place and so it does grant cross-access in the future. At this point it's -- it's kind of-- not necessary for his site or the northern neighbor. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Just in perspective that's often the case, right, with the cross-access agreement, the -- the neighbor to the south -- your property -- there wasn't any development there, there was no purpose for that -- that south cross-access at the time; right? That's -- that's why we put them in is so you get that connectivity as -- as growth continues to -- to move in a northerly or southerly portion. So, I appreciate your feedback. Again what's nice -- there is -- there is five of us that are here -- or four of us and I just -- I want to be up front as kind of where my hesitation is on this piece. I'm supportive of the application, just not supportive of that particular piece. Wilke: Okay. Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions for the applicant? Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: A clarification. Did you say that the neighbor to the north has a wall between his -- that property and your property? Wilke: Correct. Yes. Mr. Mayor, Councilman Whitlock, there is a -- it's like the home is built up at a higher elevation. So, there is actually a retaining wall on the northern portion of our applicant's property, then, there is also -- it's already fenced, but he has got six foot fencing already in place around the site. But the topography change from his property to sitting lower to the property to the north, there is a pretty substantial change in elevation where they built up the home site on the northern property. So, I think in order to make an actual access through there it may be difficult -- or more difficult to do so without cutting down the neighbor's property or adding something to it Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 19 of 26 to make that flow. We weren't really planning on engineering that in at this point with an easement in place. Whitlock: Thank you. That -- that helps. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: One additional question for you. On that wall we got the site photo that's before us. I assume is it that -- it looks like it would be about maybe two or three foot kind of concrete piece. Wilke: Correct. Cavener: Okay. Thank you. Simison: Thank you very much. Council -- or, Mr. Clerk, was there anybody else signed up on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, we did. I don't know -- we have Jared Sherburne, but I believe he was with the last application and, then, Jacob Bottles. Simison: Are either of them -- those two individuals wishing to testify at this time? Don't see anyone coming forward. So, that really just leaves you as the applicant to close with additional questions from Council. So, I don't know if there is any final comments you want to make. If there is more questions, Council has any other direction that people would like to pursue. Thank you. Wilke: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor, it looks like the applicant's got maybe a question or comment. The public hearing is still open. I'm open to hearing from him. Simison: Okay. Wilke: I apologize. Nick -- he said he is going to have a gate. I don't know if that changes things. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just to follow up on that. Sorry, was that a gate to the south? Wilke: Correct. It was planned to be gated, so -- Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 20 of 26 Strader: Okay. And, then, I have a question, then, for staff, which is -- is that acceptable under our code because it's a cross-access? Napoli: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Strader, correct. So, as far as with this, no, it is not. As far as having a gate there that is not in the conversations that I had with him was the intent to do that. From my understanding, if you can see my cursor, on the screen he was planning on putting a gate further back on the site, which would be something that would be allowed if there was still access through the site, but with a cross-access agreement, correct, there does need to be access that's reciprocated. So, he can't just wall himself off from the southern boundary. That is correct. And I believe our fire department would not allow for that as well, if I remember correctly. Simison: So, kind of playing off of that a little bit, because, you know, cross-access now -- a cross-access in the future, construct it and put it -- it's kind of like this road -- or this sidewalk to be extended into the future mentality. If you -- you know, cross-access is really permitted, but if you can't drive through because there is a fence to the north it doesn't really exist. So, I guess that's where I'm personally -- I mean to me the bigger issue is the site -- the elevation change if there is any that requires the site to actually be properly developed I guess is the -- so, I guess at the end of the day my question is are we developing this site or are we not developing the site? Why are we here for the annexation? If we are really not going to develop the site what is the value of the annexation even to the -- to the property owner? Is there -- what are we here for? If we are just going to park some cars on it is that not allowed in the county? I'm really trying to get to the understanding of the application purpose Wilke: Mr. Mayor, Council, yes, he needs to annex in and rezone industrial for his dealership license. So, he needs to have a site and that's the reasoning for annexing in this property. We didn't really think it was going to be an issue with the cross-access easement until the northern site developed and to that point, like you say, with the elevation changes we would have to do something with the northern neighboring property I think to make everything flow and until they are ready to develop we really don't know where to even put the cross-access. It may have to meander. I don't know. Maybe they will remove that home in the future. I'm just not sure what -- what the plan would be on -- on the northern side there. His site is pretty -- pretty easy to develop. It's -- like you say, it's a -- that's a lot with parking spaces and, then, maybe in the future a maintenance building they need to get a permit for and his office. So, it's -- it doesn't need to have a lot of structural changes to the -- to develop the site. It would be useful. He absolutely needs to be able to annex in to have his dealership license approved. Napoli: Mr. Mayor, if I may. In addition to that, he actually did have his well fail on the site as well. So, he is needing to hook up to city services. He has been working with Kyle Radeck in Public Works to be proactive in that. He has hit a little bit of a roadblock, not from our end, but from ACHD in the fact that Linder right now is a no cut. So, he is having a little bit of a difficulty with that, but he is working with ACHD actively on being able to access the water that's in Linder Road. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 21 of 26 Simison: So, maybe take this to the next step. Annexation is allowed. No cross-access is required. Next week we get an application on the property to the north. Are they prohibited from developing in the future because cross-access isn't granted down or cross-access won't occur until this property decides that they want to -- just trying to follow the dominoes as to what are we creating potentially by not requiring proper development? And I'm going to use the word proper, because that's really what it is in this -- in this case. I understand the hardship, but it's -- you know -- Parsons: Mayor and Council, I will try to elaborate on that a little bit and give you some context. So, I think all of you are aware -- cross-access is -- is required per our code, but it also can be waived by Council. So, it's not a thou shall do that, it gives you the ability to take that under consideration and determine if it makes sense. If it's proper development. In this particular case if we don't get cross-access to the property to the north we are either going to rely on the other property to the north of it to provide cross- access or Council and ACHD will have to grant that gentleman access to an arterial for his property. That's kind of the risk that we are dealing with. The difficulty that you have with this particular site is, one, is typically a car dealership is not conducive to cross- access, because of the inventory. Certainly that gentleman could put a gate around his inventory where the park -- cars are parked and still leave the drive aisle open. The other challenge to the site is the current -- the -- and we have been dealing with the applicant -- is where the property owner on the south with the cross-access driveway, it lines up right where the house is and so if that house wasn't to remain you could just go straight up and parallel the road and have a straight shot and it would probably work better for all intents and purposes for -- but keeping the existing home is really the challenge here. That's -- that's kind of that in-fill challenge that we are faced with when you try to keep existing conditions and try to fit our code into that box it gets to be challenging at some point. But you are correct if there is a driveway built it's basically a driveway to nowhere until we understand what the property owner to the north does and I have worked on cross-access driveways. I don't know if you are familiar with the one on Fairview, but there is a vet clinic and some four-plexes. So, you know where the new Triple A went in, there was a car dealership there. I had them put in that cross- access to the vet and, guess what, it's three feet taller than the vet site and never got extended and so the vet currently uses their access to Fairview -- Fairview Avenue, because that was one of those kind of sites where we are like build it now, but we didn't take the rest of -- if that existing property didn't match up they couldn't just tear out his driveway -- or his parking lot and, then, build their driveway to match up. It does -- to your point, Council Woman Strader, it -- it adds expense to the project and we just don't know that. So, that's why Nick and I -- we have done this in the past where we have had a lot of those storage facilities that you see along Ten Mile -- Ten Mile Road, that's what we did, we are like as long as your storage we are not going to require cross- access, but we still need an easement just in case. At some point in the future properties will get too expensive to develop and there will be a lot more redevelopment happening in the city rather than outward growth and so people will have to start developing -- redeveloping some of these properties and so we don't want to be so narrow sided not to require it and that's why we kind of went to our -- our bag of tricks that we have used in other projects and said if you are a car dealership you can build a Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 22 of 26 cross-access, but you don't have to utilize it until such time as it becomes an office or something else in the future. It may be a contractor's yard and maybe they don't want it either, so -- but they always -- we at least get another bite at the apple. It's in the DA. We can come back and have that conversation with you in the future, too, and say this cross-access makes sense. And I think that's what the point of the conversation is tonight, does cross-access make sense. What's currently developed on the south and the unknown on the north with the addition of the retaining wall and the grade change how does that all work in tandem with one another. We don't know that tonight. Like you said, all we are here to talk about is annexation and developing a car lot on this one site and that's what makes it difficult when you have these one acre pieces that we are taking down one piece at a time along Linder Road and trying to make sure that it all integrates as one development. It is -- it's challenging. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: So, just -- sort of just cutting to the chase, it looks like you have at least -- at a minimum at least two members of the City Council that have concerns about -- about the cross-access, so -- and I know you wanted your client to be in this meeting. They are not here. Are you looking for a decision tonight, like an up or down vote on it? Are you looking -- because if it's denied, then, I believe that will potentially cause some issues in terms of delays and so forth. Or would you like to rethink all this? I guess I'm just like looking for feedback on how you want to move forward. Wilke: Yes. Mr. Mayor, Commissioner Strader, this -- we were hoping for an approval tonight, but I don't know if what Bill said is okay with you. If you -- if that swayed the two Council Members that may be leaning towards needing the access put in place currently or if it would be okay to keep that as an easement now until we know what this northern site develops as and, like Bill said, there is homes in the way, you can't just cross- access through, because he is going to have his office there. It's not moving. And, then, the building to the north -- or the home that's currently to the north is also about the same -- same line. So, where -- where would they put their cross-access currently and in the future when these sites develop to a different use possibly maybe that's the time you need to cross-access for maybe a restaurant. I don't know what you would come in there for, but right now I think that lot as it sits it would be great if we could keep that as an easement. It would fantastic. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Just to dialog on that a little bit, part of my concern is, again, by approaching it this way I think what we are setting ourselves up for is a situation where when the other property develops I think it will make it so that the economic burden of figuring out the construction of the cross-access will fall onto that property owner Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 23 of 26 exclusively and I don't see either, you know, money put into like an account for future construction costs or something that would make me feel comfortable that that will be realized. It's just -- I think Council President Cavener hit it on the head, this is our only bite at the apple to get the cross-access and we have seen many situations where the cross-access did not occur and, then, that creates a lot of challenges within the city, because of the lack of connectivity. We don't know what will be there. So, that -- that's -- that's what I'm struggling with. I -- I would rather have you build the stub street -- although it's not really a street to your point, it's maybe five feet of landscaping that you need to pave or whatever, but I would rather have that occur and feel confident that that won't be an issue on your property. That's just where I'm coming from. I would love to hear from everybody else. But I just -- I just, unfortunately, don't feel like this compromise quite gets me there in terms of feeling confident that we have set the city up long term -- and not just for the next ten years, but for the next 50 years. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Again just to -- to help clarify this in my mind, I think I heard you say that they have poured a -- a parking lot to the north; is that correct? Is that -- is it paved or concrete or -- have they made improvements to the north? Wilke: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Whitlock, no, there is no parking lot to the north. It's just a residential home site and the concrete is actually a retaining wall. It's because their -- their home is built higher, so it's keeping the -- the dirt from falling basically onto the southern neighbor where our applicant's property would be. It's keeping their -- their property up to shape. But there is no parking lot that I'm aware of on that north side. I think it's just a residential property still. Whitlock: Okay. Residential. Simison: Not knowing where -- I will just speak from my standpoint if these two are going the way that they may imply that they may, I need more clarification if I'm being asked to vote tonight. I would need a site plan for all three properties that shows cross- access for future -- you know, two different options. They all develop it together at what -- some point in time as one property and here is what it would be and it -- absent that what would this look like, because three entrances onto Linder in this location is unacceptable and that's what we got to work towards. I'm not saying it has to be -- in my opinion it doesn't have to be constructed now, but it needs to be on a site plan established for when this were to develop, you know, or short of that first in gets first rights to make the decision, build it and it exits, you have done your part. The next people will have to match it on their property, you know, and often first people in get that opportunity. So, what are the other -- either work with the neighbor and come up with a plan in my opinion or agree to do it and the neighbor can match it when it's their turn in that context. But I need something along those lines, rather than just saying where it's -- just allow the annexation without really any improvements to the property. But I Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 24 of 26 understand why and I won't be supportive, but I'm not there yet if I'm asked to be involved in the vote tonight. Wilke: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Mr. Mayor, Council -- Council Members, I believe my applicant would absolutely love to build it now and get it on the spot or at least put it in place. Do we build -- do you know where you would want to put something like that? Is that something that the city is going to require in a location or -- Nick? Napoli: Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council, yeah, so as far as with that, it's called two different locations that we can have a discussion on at the certificate of zoning compliance. Really the first one is going to be between the existing residents now and the future maintenance shop that you are proposing or further back on the site between the car lot and the maintenance. I think ideally -- and I don't know the full dimension of how wide this is right here, if it does meet the dimensional standards and, obviously, that maintenance shop is not there. If it does meet the dimensional standards for a driveway I think that is the preferred location. I don't know what your client's preferred location is, but those would be the two that we -- one of the two we would require and I think the one closer to Linder would be preferred from the city's perspective. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Would -- just a suggestion. Would it be helpful to get a continuance this evening, so you could confer with your client and work with city staff on where the cross-access would be located? I'm kind of wondering if maybe just taking a break and kind of coming back might make more sense. Wilke: Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, that may be a great idea. I don't think we are really far apart here at all. I think if my applicant was here he would be able to make the call. I don't really want to get him pinned in on one side or the other and that will give him time to work with the city. The city's been amazing. The staff's incredible. You guys are fantastic to work with. So, I think that's a fantastic idea. Simison: And at least from my perspective it doesn't need to be functional however. It can have a sign that says to be extended in the future, you know. So, whether that's when your property develops or the next property develops, we are not looking to force something, but we are looking to make sure something happens, at least from my perspective. So, I will stop there. Council Woman Strader. Strader: Mr. Mayor, I was just curious for feedback on when you would like to come back. In a couple weeks? Or -- if you have -- and we need to also check with our clerk, too, and see what our public hearing schedule is sort of looking like, but -- Wilke: Yeah. I think I could -- Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, I think they can get that figured out pretty quick. I don't think it's a big pull here. Mr. Mayor and Council -- Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 25 of 26 Council Members, would it be something that we could put on the development agreement now that -- I'm just thinking maybe if that was a problem for timing and things with the city and there will be a cross-access agreement put in place and a cross- access before the agreement -- before the annexation is final. Can that just be put in a development agreement now as part of the agreement or do you have to have a plan -- a site plan change? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I feel like with the feedback you have received I think having the site plan revised would be important, just to sort of demonstrate what this is going to look like and usually that becomes kind of an exhibit to all the decision making and we find that to be extremely helpful. So, like ten years from now when Nick's like what do we do with that hashtag, he can go and see exactly. But I would suggest -- it sounds like the 21st, which is two weeks from now, is pretty clear. We have a few things on our agenda. But would that work okay for you all to come back? Wilke: Yes. That would be fine. And Nick just texted me, says if they don't -- if he doesn't have a choice between an easement or not, then, yes, he would do the cross- access. Strader: Yeah. Wilke: But it sounds to me like we are on the same page here that in a couple weeks we could button it up. Strader: All right. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Then I would move that we keep the public hearing open and continue this application to January 21 st. Little Roberts: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to continue the public hearing to January 21 st. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and it's continued to the 21 st. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. Wilke: Thank you very much. Strader: We will see you then. Meridian City Council January 7,2025 Page 26 of 26 FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Move we adjourn the meeting. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE ABSENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:10 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. I CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET j Date: January 7, 2025 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: National Mentoring Month Proclamation (:: W IDIAN 00� IDAHO The Office of the Mayor PRO CMEAMATION Whereas, Big Brothers Big Sisters of Idaho has been a dedicated advocate for the youth of Meridian for 45 years , providing one-to- one mentoring relationships that help young people overcome challenges and reach their full potential ; and, Whereas, the mentors , known as Bigs , give their time , energy, and heart to guide , support, and encourage the children they mentor, fostering self- confidence , academic success , and emotional well -being ; and, Whereas , through mentorship , Big Brothers Big Sisters has positively impacted the lives of countless youth in Meridian, helping to empower youth to overcome adversity, experience positive relationships , and become more resilient individuals ; and, Whereas , National Mentoring Month is an opportunity to recognize and celebrate the invaluable role that mentors play in shaping the future of our youth, and to encourage more members of our community to become involved in mentoring through Big Brothers Big Sisters ; and, Whereas , the City of Meridian joins in this national effort to support Big Brothers Big Sisters of Idaho to encourage mentoring to help our communities thrive . Therefore, I Mayor Robert E . Simison, hereby proclaim January 2025 as "0 National jW entortng Month in the City of Meridian and call upon the citizens to join Big Brothers Big Sisters of Idaho in the pursuit of improving the lives of young peopl n our community through mentoring . Dated this 7' day of January, 2025 o rt E . S1 on May Luke Cav ne ity Council President Liz Strader, City Council Vice -President John Overton, City Council Anne Little Roberts , City Council Doug Taylor, City Council Brian Whitlock, City Council it yn "F7^- ':y A � •fit - . s ,1 • � i 1 w0.1 Ir4XA i t � , I 1 1 S 1� �I .E. w. ^ to 1�. .. .._ VIA iIN fi^ayr 1 l � i v _ C � (e frnnri OVA AV VIVO Jll T VN v� 9' ROCLA ?JA7lf1N aLtlbnuf94�nfmuyl Ntmlh i i C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline h2 City Council Meeting01/07/2025 Zoning MapAerial MapFuture Land Use Map Future Land Use MapAerial MapZoning Map Original Site PlanRevised Site Plan •and service.”north when the subject property redevelops as any use other than a Vehicle sales or rental access driveway shall be constructed to the property to the -egress easement. The cross-the property to the south (Parcel #R3579000020) while recording a cross access/ingressthat stubs to the property to the north (Parcel #R3579000012) and construct a driveway to 3, the applicant shall record an easement -3A-“In accord with UDC 11Proposed Change: •application for the proposed use.”of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance #R3579000020) in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Linder Road. Copies granted to the properties to the north (Parcel #R3579000012) and south (Parcel egress easement -access/ingress-stubs to the north and south property lines and a cross3, the applicant shall construct driveway -3A-: “In accord with UDC 11Existing Provision C•concept plan.one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building as shown on the “No more than (5) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Road at any Proposed Change: •Road at any one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building.”: “No more than three (3) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Existing Provision B W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Pollard North (H-2024-0037) by Brighton Corporation, generally located approximately 1/4 mile north of W. Chinden Blvd. at the north end of N. Levi Ave. on the north side of W. Waverton Dr. Applicant Requests a Continuance A. Request: Rezone of 21.95 acres of land from the R-8 to the TN-R zoning district. B. Request: Preliminary Plat for 177 building lots and 26 common lots on 19.76 acres of land in the TN-R zoning district for Pollard North Subdivision. C. Request: Modified Development Agreement (Inst.#2019-060655) for a new agreement for the residential portion of the development with an updated conceptual development plan. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/7/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council :::Area of Impact City Limits FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 sallen@meridiancity.org _ APPLICANT: Brighton Corporation'` SUBJECT: H-2024-0037 Pollard North-PP,RZ LOCATION: Generally located approximately 1/4 mile i north of W. Chinden Blvd. at the north m �R end of N. Levi Ave. on the north side of W. Waverton Dr., in the south 1/2 of Section 21,TAN.,R.1W. (Parcel #SO421438475). I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The Applicant requests a modification to the existing development agreement(Inst. #2019-060655)for a new agreement for the residential portion of the development with an updated development plan; rezone of 21.95-acres of land from the R-8 to the TN-R zoning district; and a preliminary plat for 177 building lots and 26 common lots on 19.76-acres of land in the TN-R zoning district. B. Issues/Waivers Request for Council approval of extended block faces beyond the maximum length standard in the TN- R district of 500' without an intersecting street or alley and up to 750' with a pedestrian connection,for the face of Blocks 1,2, 3,4 and 5 along W. Flat Rock St. and W.Waverton Dr.,which all range from 620-to 875-feet in length. Per UDC 11-6C-3F, Council may approve a block face up to 1,200'in length where block design is constrained by site conditions such as an abutting arterial street or highway, a limited access street, railroad tracks, steep slopes in excess of 10%, an abuttingurban rban project with no adjoining alley or street connections, a public or private education facility or park, a large waterway and/or a lame irrigation facility—none of which exist in this case. Staff comments: A waiver to the TN-R standards isn't necessary if revisions are made to the plan to comply(i.e. a pedestrian connection could be added in Block 1 to the abutting future common open space area to the north in Alden Ridge Sub.; and street connections could be provided through Blocks 2=5). C. Recommendation Staff: Approval with the provisions included below in Section IV. City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview Commission: Denial due to the following reasons: 1)the proposed rezone would create too much density for the area; and,the transition to lower density development to the north is not enough. D. Decision Council: Pending II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1:Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant/undeveloped land - Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential detached&attached dwellings - Existing Zoning R-8 (Medium-density Residential) VILA.2 Proposed Zoning TN-R(Traditional Neighborhood Residential) Existing Future Land Use Map Medium Density Residential(MDR) VILA.3 Designation Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 7/15/2024 PREAPP-2024-0061 Neighborhood Meeting 7/22/2024 Site posting date 11/21/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District • Comments Received Yes • Commission Action Required M • Access N.Levi Ln.,a collector street,and N.Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street,via W.Chinden Blvd. • Traffic Level of Service NA(ACHD doesn't set LOS thresholds for local streets) Traffic Impact Study(Y/N) No ITD Comments Received Yes(no significant impact to the state highway system) Meridian Fire No comments received Meridian Police No comments received Meridian Public Works Wastewater Distance to Mainline: Sewer is available at site;Impacts or Concerns: see site specific conditions Meridian Public Works Water Distance to Mainline:Water provided by Veolia;Impacts or Concerns:None See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section for all department/agency and the public record for comments received on this application. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics 2.00 1,500 Single-family Residential a 1.50 1,000 Parcel Diversity 1.00 0 p Parcel Count N 0.50 500 *Average Acres c 0.00 -9-0-.00 0:0 0:00--*=OA0• 0 a J R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average � 10.00 O 9.28 Residential _ Density L 5.00 0.5.58, D O 3.78 4■76 O 1.36 o.00 Dwelling Units / Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview Development Agreement Modification: The Applicant requests a modification to the existing development agreement(Inst. #2019-060655)for a new agreement for the proposed development with an updated development plan. This property will no longer be subject to the existing DA. A legal description and exhibit map for the property to be included in the new DA is included below in Section VII.C. The current approved development plan for this area, shown below, consists of 74 building lots for conventional single-family residential homes, independent living units for 55 and older, and an 88-bed assisted living facility. y y_ . .. .� sd _ The updated development plan(i.e.preliminary plat), shown below, is for 177 building lots and 26 common lots for the development of(47) front-loaded"conventional"single-family detached dwellings and alley-loaded"carriage lane"(38) single-family detached and(92)attached"duet"dwellings. Conceptual building elevations for these dwellings are included below in Section VII.I. Larger lots are proposed along the north and east sides of the development as a transition to adjacent lots of a similar width for compatibility. City of Meridian I Department Report 0. © O ©pDQ) Ql)W 0 ® p ® p< =0000 (D0 DDT =© © © DO © © O C O © O © tl O O DD p p ® p 0000G)G)O®� =OOOp�00C CDC 0 Rezone: A rezone of 21.95-acres of land from the R-8 to the TN-R zoning district is proposed as shown in the legal description and associated exhibit in Section VII.D below. The rezone to TN-R allows more lots to develop on the property as there is no minimum lot size or street frontage requirement in the TN-R district and a lesser setback is allowed as opposed to that in the R-8 district.Note:kthe rezone is not approved, the plat will need to be revised, and the number of buildable lots will be significantly reduced to comply with the minimum dimensional standards of the R-8 district. The rezone area is designated Medium Density Residential(MDR)on the Future Lane Use Map (FLUM)included in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use and development plan with a gross density of 8.06 units per acre and net density of 14.23 units per acre is consistent with the MDR FLUM designation and the TN-R district. Preliminary Plat: A preliminary plat consisting of 177 building lots and 26 common lots on 19.76-acres of land is proposed in the TN-R zoning district. The plat is proposed to develop in one(1)final plat phase. The minimum lot size proposed is 2,238 square feet(s.£)with an average lot size of 3,062 s.f. The proposed development is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goal#3.07.01A which states, "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening, transitional densities, and other best site design practices." Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2019-0021 (Pollard Subdivision AZ,PP -DA Inst.#2019-060655); TED-2021-0003 (2-year time extension on preliminary plat);TECC-2023- 0001 (1-year time extension on preliminary plat) Phasing Plan 1 phase Physical Features There are no waterways or other physical features of importance on this site;the property is relatively flat. Acreage 19.76-acres Lots 177 single-family residential building lots and 26 common lots B. History The subject property is part of a larger area annexed with R-8 zoning in 2019 and included in a development agreement and preliminary plat for Pollard Subdivision. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There are no existing structures on this site. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): Single-family residential detached and attached dwellings are principally permitted uses in the TN- R zoning district,per UDC Table 11-2D-2. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): See UDC 11-2D-3 for standards applicable in all traditional neighborhood districts; and UDC Table 11-2D-6 for the dimensional standards of the TN-R zoning district. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Existing structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): There are no existing structures on this site. The proposed single-family attached dwellings are required to comply with the residential design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. Single-family detached dwellings are exempt from these standards. 2. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-4-3-27): Compliance with the open space and site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 and 11-3G-4 is required. A minimum of 15% (or 2.96-acres)qualified open space is required to be provided with development that meets the quality standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3A.2 and the standards for qualified open space listed in UDC 11-3G-3B. The Applicant proposes a total of 3.53-acres(or 17.86%)qualified open space consisting of several open grassy areas exceeding 5,000 square feet in area; linear open space;the street buffer along the eastern portion of W. Waverton Dr., a collector street; and parkways along local residential streets as shown on the open space exhibit in Section VII L When counting street buffers along collector streets,the buffers are required to comply with the enhanced buffer requirements in UDC 11-3G-3B.3. Parkways along local residential streets are required to meet the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.4 when counted toward open space. If any stormwater detention facilities are proposed,they're required to comply with the standards in UDC 11-3G-3B.5 when counted toward open space. Amenities totaling a minimum of four(4)points are required to be provided based on the area of the development(i.e. 19.76-acres). Site amenities totaling 4.5 points(pts.) are proposed from the Qualify of Life and Recreation Activity categories as shown on the exhibit in Section VII.1 as follows: • Quality of Life: a small dog park(3,900 s.f)with a waste station(1.5 pts.)and a picnic area on a site 5,000 s.f. or greater in size(2 pts.). The dog park is required to have bags for dog waste disposal,a double entrance gate, bench(es) and fencing to enclose the area and to secure the open space for an off-leash dog park as set forth in UDC 11-3G-4C.9. The dog park also counts toward the required common open space. The picnic area is required to include tables,benches,landscaping and a structure for shade, as set forth in UDC 11-3G-4C.5. • Recreation Activity Area: a tot lot(1 pt.) Per UDC 11-3G-4D.3,the tot lot is required to have commercial grade play equipment scaled and designed for the use and safety of younger children; benches for seating shall be provided nearby. i. The proposed common open space and site amenities meet and exceed UDC standards for such. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis ii. Landscaping is required to be provided in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-5B and maintained in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-5C. The proposed development is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy#2.02.00,which states, Plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. 3. Landscaping (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3B): Attractive landscaping and pedestrian friendly design is required within new developments in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02G. Landscaping is required to be provided within the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B. i. Landscape buffers along streets A 20-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Waverton Dr. designated as a collector street, east of N. Levi Ave., landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. The buffer is required to be planted with a variety of trees,shrubs, lawn, or other vegetative groundcover. Lawn and other grasses requiring regular mowing shall comprise no more than sixty-five (65)percent of the vegetated coverage of a landscape buffer. This maximum area excludes landscaped parkway with trees.All other vegetated coverage shall be mulched and treated as planting area for shrubs or other vegetative cover.Areas along required walls and closed vision fences should generally be reserved for planting beds with a minimum of one(1) shrub per seven (7)lineal feet of frontage, as demonstrated in Figure 1. The buffer shall also comply with the enhanced buffer requirements listed in UDC 11-3G- 313.3 because it was counted toward open space requirements. All street buffers are required to be in a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement,maintained by the property owner,homeowner's association or business owner's association per UDC 11-313-7C.2a and should be depicted on the plat. ii. Storm integration Stormwater integration is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11 C. A Geotechnical Engineering Report was submitted with this application and is included in the project file. iii. Pathway landscaping Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided for each dwelling based on the number of bedrooms per unit in accord with the standards for single-family detached and attached dwellings in UDC Table 11-3C-6. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Several conceptual building elevations were submitted for 2-story detached and attached single- family residential homes, included in Section VII.I below. A variety of materials are proposed including vertical and horizontal lap siding,board and batten siding, stucco and fenestration with masonry accents in a variety of colors and design elements/features with varying roof profiles and wall modulation that demonstrate the high quality of development proposed. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis All single-family attached structures are subject to the residential design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM).Although single-family detached structures are typically exempt from these standards,compliance can be required by the Commission and Council as part of a development agreement.A few of the conceptual elevations for single-family detached homes lack the variety of materials and colors desired in the ASM;however,they do appear to meet the alterative standards which include the provision of design elements such as corbels, front porches, facade and roof modulation, stone and brick accents,wood columns,lintels,balconies, awnings, etc. Therefore, Staff finds them acceptable. Staff is of the opinion the proposed conceptual building elevations are in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02L: "Support beautiful and high-quality development that reinforces neighborhood character and sustainability. 6. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All/any fencing proposed on the site should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The landscape plan depicts 5-foot tall open vision metal fencing and 6-foot tall closed vision stained cedar fencing on the shared property line of some building and common lots. The developer is responsible for constructing fences abutting all pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas.Fencing should be depicted on a revised landscape plan along with a detail of the fencing type proposed; or,alternative compliance may be requested to the standard. 7. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): All parkways should comply with the standards for such listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Parkways are proposed along all streets within the subdivision,except for along N. Pollard Ln.,with landscaping that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C, as required. Parkways along local residential streets shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.4 when counted toward open space requirements as proposed. E. Transportation Analysis A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was not submitted for this development as ACHD did not require one. Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)/Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • Black Cat Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from McMillan Road to US 20/26 between 2036 and 2040. • The intersection of US 20/26 and Black Cat Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes on the north leg, 5-lanes on the south, 7-lanes east, and 7-lanes on the west leg, and signalized between 2036 and 2040. Condition of Area Roadways(Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per Hour(VPH): Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service Pollard Lane 315-feet Local Industrial N/A NIA Waverton Drive 2,667-feet Local 27 N/A #*ACHD does not set(level of service thresholds for locai streets. Collector streets are required to be constructed with development in accord with ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM) and/or as required by ACHD. The section of W.Waverton Dr.between N. Levi Ave. and the east boundary of the site is designated as a collector street. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): 1. Access is proposed from W. Chinden Blvd. from the south via N. Levi Ave., a collector street,and from the east via W.Waverton Dr. from N. Black Cat Rd., an arterial street. Two (2) stub streets are proposed to the north for future extension and interconnectivity with adjacent future development. The western stub street(N. Woodhead Ave.) is in alignment with that approved in Alden Ridge Subdivision to the north. Local and collector street connectivity is proposed within the development in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#6.01.02B, "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity. " 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multi-use pathways are required to be provided with development in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. There are no pathways depicted on the Plan on this property;therefore,none are required. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. Pathways are depicted on the landscape plan throughout common areas for pedestrian connectivity within the development and to adjacent developments.A pathway stub exists to this property at this boundary,which is being extended with development. The pathways along the east and west sides of Lot 15,Block 5 abut the residential property lines and don't have the required 5-feet of landscaping on both sides of the pathway as set forth in UDC 11-3B-12C.The landscape plan should be revised to comply with these standards; or,a request for alternative compliance may be submitted to this standard as set forth in UDC 11-5B-5. 4. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Five-foot wide detached sidewalks are proposed along the section of W. Waverton Dr.west of N. Levi Ave.,designated as a local street, and along the eastern section of Waverton that lies east of N. Silver Birch Ave. to align with the existing 5-foot wide detached sidewalk to the east. The section of Waverton between Levi and Silver Birch, designated as a collector street,is proposed to have 10- foot wide detached sidewalks. 5. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): Compliance with the subdivision design and improvements standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3 is required. Alleys: Alleys are required to comply with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. The proposed 20- foot wide alleys appear to comply with these standards. Common driveways: Common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. One (1) common driveway is proposed on Lot 15,Block 3 for access to Lots 13 and 14. A common driveway exhibit is included in Section VII.F that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. Perpetual ingress/egress shall be required either by a recorded easement or as a note on a recorded final plat.The easement or plat note shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited,unless separated by a minimum five-foot wide landscaped buffer planted with shrubs,lawn or other vegetative City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis groundcover—if fencing is proposed along the south side of Lot 15,Block 3, a 5-foot wide buffer should be provided. Block face: In traditional neighborhood districts,no block face should have a length greater than 500-feet without an intersecting street or alley, except as allowed in UDC 11-6C-3F.3. Where a pedestrian connection is provided,then the maximum block face may be extended up to 750-feet in length in the TN-R district. The pedestrian connection shall provide access from within the subdivision to one(1) or more of the following: a qualified open space as defined in UDC 11-3G- 3.B, a street, or a common open space area or public meeting area within an abutting development. The City Council may approve a block face up to 1,200-feet in length where the block design is constrained by site conditions which include, among other things,an abutting urban project with no adjoining alley or street connections suehthe ease with this deve ,pffle The face of Blocks 1,2, 3,4, and 5 along W. Flat Rock St. and W.Waverton Dr. all range from 620-to 875-feet in length, exceeding the maximum length standard. Blocks 1-3 along the northern boundary do not include a pedestrian connection or an intersecting street but could be revised to include one, as applicable(i.e. a pedestrian connection could be provided in Block 1 and intersecting streets could be provided in Blocks 2-5); Blocks-4-6 6 does include a mid-block pedestrian connection. The Applicant has provided written justification, as required, for the block faces(i.e. Blocks 2, 3,4 and 5)that exceed 750-feet in length. The reasons stated are as follows: the original Pollard Subdivision preliminary plat entitlement established the location of the two(2)north/south public streets(i.e.N.Woodhead Ave. &N. Schwenkfelder Ave.),which are being retained with the proposed subdivision; due to the shape of the parcel and existing roadway connections in the area, the project is designed with blocks that exceed the maximum standard;the street length and location are restricted by the agreed upon position of N. Schwenkfelder Ave,which will serve both parcels to the north(i.e. SO421314900& S0421428100)for future development and will presumably connect to W. Highland Fall Dr. in Fairbourne Estates. As mitigation for the longer block faces,the Applicant proposes pedestrian-friendly elements,including bulb-outs(noted in yellow),chokers(noted in red)and designated pedestrian accesses (with distances noted in black) on the following diagram: ° 4 00 A UTTI J Q WAVERTON - m S J Q WAVERTON City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis F. Services Analysis See Service Accessibility Report in Section VII.B below. 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): All waterways, except natural waterways,are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. There are no waterways within the boundary of this property. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided in each development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in accord with the adopted standards, specifications and ordinances; design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City per UDC 11-3A-18. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): All utilities for the proposed development are required to be installed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-21. Water service is provided by Veolia; sewer service is available at the site. Main lines are required to be extended to and through the subject property with development. The developer should coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Dept. and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. 5. Topography This property slopes down from the east to the west as shown on Sheet PP 1.1 of the plat. 6. Hazards Staff is unaware of any hazards that exist on this site. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS The Commission has recommended denial of the subject application; therefore, is not recommending conditions of approval to City Council. Typically. conditions are removed from the report; however, Staff has left them in for Council's consideration if they choose to approve the proposed project. In the event Council denies the project, the following conditions will be stricken from the Findings document. A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A new Development Agreement(DA) shall be required as a provision of the MDA and RZ applications. The previous DA [i.e. Pollard Subdivision-Inst. #2019-060655)] shall no longer be in effect for the subject property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance,a new DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner at the time of rezone ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat application shall not be submitted until the rezone is finalized. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision&Order for the Rezone and MDA request. The new DA shall incorporate the following provisions: i. Future development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the conceptual development plan/preliminary plat, landscape plan, open space and site amenity exhibit and City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions conceptual building elevations included below in Section VII,the conditions contained herein and the standards in the Unified Development Code(UDC). ii. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the development. iii. The developer shall construct 10-foot wide detached sidewalks along W. Waverton Dr. on the section east of N. Levi Ave. to the west side of N. Silver Birch Ave., as proposed. iv. Administrative design review shall be required for all single-family attached structures in accord with the residential design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. Single- family detached structures are exempt from these standards. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 20-foot wide street buffer along W. Waverton Dr. designated as a collector street, east of N. Levi Ave.,in a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement,maintained by the property owner,homeowner's association per UDC 11-3B-7C.2a. ii. Reconfigure Blocks 1,2, 3,4, and 5 ad6 along W. Flat Rock St. and W.Waverton Dr. to comply with the block face standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3F for the TN-R district,unless otherwise waived by City Council. The Applicant requests City Council waive the block face standards on the aforementioned blocks. 3. The landscape plan shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 20-foot wide street buffer along W. Waverton Dr. designated as a collector street, east of N. Levi Ave.,with landscaping per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. Include additional landscaping with calculations that demonstrate compliance with the required standards. The buffer shall also comply with the enhanced buffer requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.3 and because it was counted toward open space requirements. The buffer shall also comply with the enhanced buffer requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.3 because it was counted toward open space requirements. ii. Depict fencing abutting pathways and common open space lots to distinguish common from private areas as set forth in UDC 11-3A-7A.7; or, submit a request for alternative compliance to this standard. iii. Depict a minimum 5-foot wide landscape strip along both sides of the pathways located along the east and west sides of Lot 15,Block 5 with landscaping in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-12C; or, submit a request for alternative compliance to this standard as set forth in UDC 11-513-5. iv. If solid fencing is proposed along the south side of Lot 15, Block 3, a 5-foot wide buffer should be provided planted with shrubs,lawn or other vegetative groundcover as set forth in UDC 11- 6C-3D.5. The plat should be adjusted accordingly. 4. The common driveway shall be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D and per the common driveway exhibit in Section VII.F. 5. Perpetual ingress/egress shall be required for the common driveway either by a recorded easement or as a note on a recorded final plat as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D. The easement or plat note shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. 6. Submit a detail of the dog park that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3G-4C.9,which require bags for dog waste disposal, a double entrance gate,bench(es), and fencing to enclose the area and secured open space for an off-leash dog park. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions 7. Submit a detail of the tot lot that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G- 4D.3,which require commercial grade play equipment scaled and designed for the use and safety of younger children with benches for seating nearby. 8. Submit a detail of the picnic area that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-4C.5,which require the area to include tables,benches, landscaping and a structure for shade. 9. Off-street parking is required to be provided for all single-family residential units in accord with the standards for such listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6. 10. All waterways, except natural waterways, intersecting,crossing or lying within the area being development are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. If left open, fencing may be required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C. Other Agency comments may be accessed in the project file in the public record. Copy and paste the following link into your browser https://weblink.meridiancity.orgJ ebLink/Browse.aspx?id=358315&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development plan does not comply with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan pertaining to transition in density and compatibility with adjacent uses. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed amendment to the TN-R district is consistent with the purpose statement in that a variety of residential land uses are proposed, including single-family detached and attached units, many of which are accesses from alleys; however,pedestrian and vehicular is not the most efficient due to the longer block faces proposed, which do not meet UDC standards and require special approval from Council. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be materially detrimental to the public health and safety but may be detrimental to the public welfare according to testimony presented during the public hearing from area residents. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed map amendment may result in an adverse impact on the school district and traffic on area roadways due to the increase in density proposed with the map amendment. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the proposed request is for a rezone, not annexation. However, in regard to the rezone, the Commission does not find a map amendment is in the best interest of the City. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat, the decision- making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; For the above-noted reasons in Section VA, the Commission finds the proposed plat is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan or the UDC due to the blockface lengths proposed. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services are available to the site and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds there are no scheduled public improvements that affect development of this site. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development should not be materially detrimental to the public health and safety but may be detrimental to the public welfare according to testimony presented during the public hearing from area residents. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA,RZ and PP requests with the provisions included above in Section IV. Council should consider and take action on the waiver requested by the Applicant pertaining to block face. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5,2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject RZ and PP requests. l. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Eli Benski and Jon Wardle,Brighton Corporation b. In opposition: David Hitz, Jacob Jensen,David Durrough, Scott Willoughby,Kyle Enzler, Jade Enzler,Lea Taylor, Chase Taylor C. Commenting None City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action d. Written testimony: Eli Benski,Brighton Corporation(in agreement with staff report conditions e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Concern pertainingto o higher traffic volumes and resulting safety concerns for area children due to the proposed increase in the number of homes planned for this area. b. Proposed development seems inconsistent with what was planned for this area(i.e. lower density residential). c. Opinion that proposed density is too high and doesn't provide an adequate transition and site design that is compatible with existing and future development to the north. The proposed TN-R zoning allows a higher density due to lesser setback requirements than the existing R-8 district. Concern that the proposed open space isn't adequate for the density and lot sizes proposed,resulting in residents using the common areas in adjacent developments. d. Opinion that it would be unfair to adjacent residents to change the development plan for this area from what was previously approved and anticipated for this area to a much higher density development. e. Not in favor of the changes to the development plan as the previous plan,which included an assisted livingf acility,was much less dense and would result in much less traffic in the area. f. Concern that the higher volume of traffic generated from the proposed development will be pushed through the adjacent development to the east(i.e. Fairbourne Sub.) for access to the signal at Black Cat Rd. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Not in favor of the proposed zoning& development plan, opinion the density is too high and not appropriate for this area and will adversely affect area neighbors,preference for the existing development plan and density; inadequate transition to existing and future residential properties;waiver to block face standards wouldn't be needed if existing zoning is retained; and the higher density will create more traffic impacts on area roadways,more impacts on area schools and create more demand for services. b. Preference for the R-8 zoning to be retained with revisions to the development plan to replace the assisted livingfacility acility with single-family residential building lots similar in size to those approved with the previous plat. C. No issue with TN-R zoning if the development plan reflects compliance with associated development provisions(i.e. block face length d. In favor of the variety of housingtypes proposed with smaller lots sizes,which may provide opportunities for people to be able to afford a starter home. e. In favor of keeping the same general plan but reducing the number of units, which would address a lot of the concerns noted by providing a better transition to the north, compliance with block face standards and the provision of additional open space& site amenities, including pedestrian accesses, for the development. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Denial—the proposed rezone creates too much density for the area&the transition to lower density development to the north is not enough. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. Request for Council approval of extended block faces beyond the maximum length standard in the TN-R district of 500' without an intersecting street or alley, and to 750' with a pedestrian connection, for the face of Blocks 1,2, 3,4 and 5 along W. Flat Rock St. and W. Waverton Dr.,which all range from 620-to 875-feet in length. Per UDC 11-6C-3F, Council may approve a block face up to 1,200'in length where block design is constrained by site conditions such as an abutting arterial street or highway, a City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action limited access street, railroad tracks, steep slopes in excess of 10%, an abutting urban project with no adjoining alley or street connections, a public or private education aciliU or park, a large waterway and/or a large irrigation facility—none of which exist in this case. A waiver to the standards isn't necessary if revisions are made to the plan to comply, as follows: a pedestrian connection could be added in Block 1 to the abutting future common open space area to the north in Alden Ridge Sub.; and street connections could be provided through Blocks 2-5. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action ' 1 1 _ J y iPWR CHIND,EN Z .1 SIMMONS - O �• , Vr. 1•y h • .f M r �.-•- � �_ ��� �gi= fw.111� • n n.� � �t !!A' C� ♦ •N11 e 1 `� p✓ 1 s e 44 -" =1111111111 r=+1 MITI II�-ii. 1� :i916l�s,BP�ePIOj�a�_• �� 1 '� I • s° �°id EII CH�INDEN '� 1q� -'Ilulll 111111111■.b.Ij1�11[IIui11 � 11!lFIIIII IOlII IIIRup i�M' � I�111111 1111111 �C IIIIII 11 w Gl�l�hv.�,Illlu.. JI Ali NN f.� � __ _ 11 nuumml•Ills II • 1� �plIIIIi Illli.IIOII.��°Vaoaattt5ti 11111111 NlNI!! !11 11 . 1111111 V h1j.. :■ 11111 III M of. i fel�1 —�,a. �`_ '��Ir[IIIIr11r G- 1i111111'��11Irr qO.:� IOIII �•.p�- 1 [III illll[IIIIII ?V tJlllf�l uIIIInury I�rl/.2 ►� :IIIIII 111111111��] ►+♦ '",..��{l�� � �IIIIIIII�r Irr1.111111� 11��`�i.J) iRllllf lilllll! S wn nro •�+� r�.111 � 1111i11�-�a.inlrllr �`. S� - -• �i L t+ash� .ap� .����.r-- t ■O r tnn `j' I _C�� w■ s��t1�unrl _ �. ff� :' 5 m i{frlffu�-wsr � "� C► ' yr�1► 'fin 1 �/, CHINDEN�' ���s-aa��l � �^ �Iliwl:aaln 1 unu..... n1111111fj' Illniiiolllln lullllll /•i9��s IIIIII =:IIIIII II IIFIEI I IIIIIEl1 rl _IIIIIIII= null�nm nlnnu� • - uur.•u urnlne=mFit 1111■n mug_'__ Iili1 t � nn iHIr14UYlrlllgpl ■i■ � Q �. Ir111111 _:1111111 V �::�11„1 rq1::7 Q./i r11111/Ii�Allfl�l Rrl f�p - �w •rw r��r,IIIIIi111r.- nn11., r r rrK►_ Y :■n:■. ww�.n111run,. 'uj �. ?4 ..r:��■lurr V .I1 I�...Alum nlfwtl t'-(��IIIIIII■IF■IIF1 1111111111111111111111r111 ki IIt t111rIwr w*r+�\Iul�r�xn- ou uuwnul nw nnul 11 1111Illlnll IIIIIIIOI■ r ill{{-_ J Jill rINN/. �?Illnnnnl 1111111I���rjl i��rti�'�{' r�Iin•�{� 1111111:r Irr1111l111. mnr uw mu Qt�`♦ •� ttI 111 I' 1+. m _ � 1111111�-■OIIrIg1i� aw-- � r p� {III .t• � ifulils�/l r w ''�• M'. y�ili/`rrrr a mom• qll -�'■ur_�_l►� +t,lhgT ��J fllll��otg.°�= y �ir1 �. IIIIII Illllfr Anil Ihn mmc. /-���"p WHO �• • ■� . .Illlllllllr llll �.,r /.✓ J��■ �• nn IIIL./nlllr�l .� ����1+}p. � —� � Ilunl�mlunnunrl;111111111111y� pulllnllllp1111111111, �f' null InInI unnu=:.e■■n1 �nnuu�..IIIIlu1 e o/ -. 11i131 Illllr III1EIIn _ - 41AIA1l1 •I I I Il'---�1111�� :L�LiL��OIIIFII!-- �� i/11111111�IInE1 111 �Inll�l;: 'llllr= �� ILA Lrllllunml,+,III11111�iqu�ul�i'nrir= �~ r�i'�- I�ili l�Ilill�'niiliil_ �i711nm11111r nur11N� � unntn mnnl � •=un �i1w- :�IIIII{IIO Ienlf �+: p 1, _ H :_ :_►alrr 1unr�;.f ■iutt y.��_ �Tk7.IMEN I .1 (� _!r►I. �. inn nni�: O`er w ;r 1 J_ Y 1111 w. U,11111n1. G .Inu.uw=_..uuu pw �-►� /,uhi11"ill +, Inrn•-C rnrl rlNu:= r�'1■1 nnl►r� Im n■OIIIIIII'�11111111�w ww::�purA�ulnlll, V Jill l1116■, PI!!1`..Fllm IDuumllr� •r�.�t{►r-__uuum Q 11111 IIIIt�1:Inu11 i1no1 11 III„�,Iln�llnl � It111ar .� ll--= I noon,■ ou+rnn_riiiiiiiilll Iliiiiinl'` P� I* ___'�� �,11-Inn tivl� i♦+�G+ p f1��:nl,■!Ir m ���nnnl M Ullnrn,Ir11�� B. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL E042143 475 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY overall Score: 12 2nd Percentile Location - City Limits Extension Sewer TrunKshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN I Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or 5� 2 acres I GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time > g min, ED Emergency Services Police Not enough data to report average response time Pathways Within 114 mile of current pathways Transit Not within 114 of current or future transit route Ultimate configuration(#of lanes in master streets Arterial Road Buildout Status plan) > existing (#of lanes) &road IS NOT in 5 yr work plan SchooI Walking Proximity From 112 to 1 mile walking YELLOW Eithera pigh School or College within 2 miles OR a SchooI Driwability Middle or Elementar,,School within 1 mile driving (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type Repxt gst-erysd on T1-25-2G24 by H:R1D1AK--;sa11en City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Legal Description & Exhibit Map for Boundary of Proposed New Development Agreement Im August 1,2024 Project No.24-031 Exhibit A Legal Description for DaWopmentAgreement Modification(pollard North Subdivision) A pa reel of I a nd situated in a portion of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 114 and the Sout heart 1 f 4 of the Southwest V4 of Section 21,Town ship 4 North,Ra nge 1 West B-M,City of Meridian,Ada Cou nty,Idaho,and being more particularly described as follows: Cornm endng at a n alurninurn cap marking the South 1/4cornerof said section 2I which bears 589°27'17"E a distance of 2,509.39 feet from an aluminum ca p marking the Southwest comer of said Section 21r thence along the westerly line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4(easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1�4)of said Section 21,N00°32'12"f=a distance of L327.30 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar marking the Center-South 1/iGth corner of said Section 21 a nd being the POl NT OF BEGIN NIntG- Thence leaving said westerly line(and said easterly line)and fol lowirkg said northerly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4,589°20'25"E a distance of 1,305,33 feet to a 5/84nch rebar marking the Southeast 1/16th ca rner of said Section 21; Thence leaving said northerky line and fol lowing the easterly line of said Southwest V41 of the Southeast 1/4, 500°27'11"W a distance of 506,58 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the subdivision boundary of Pollard Subdivision No.1(Book 127,Pages 20407-20411,records of Ada County,Idaho); 7herxe fol lowing said subdivision bounda ry the fol lowing fourteen(14)co urses. 1_ 588850'33"W a distance of 17,71)feet to a 5f84nch rebar; 2- 133-88 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 238.Sefeet,a delta angle of 32°09'46",a chord bea ring of h173°27'56W and a chord distance of 132.13 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar, 3. N07°05'39 W a distance of 26.37 feet t4 a 5/8-inch rebar; 4, N52"4(Y22'W a distance of 61.09 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; 5. 581`24'3VW a distance of 14-13 feet toa 5/8-inch rebar; 6- 246-97 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the let said curve having a radius of-;W-50 feet a delta angle of 46°55'57",a chord bea ri ng of N65:5:V4VW a nd a chord d istance of 240,12 feet to a 5/3-Inch rebar, 7. N89'19'43"W a distance of 524.75 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; S. 1444°W2TV a distance of 23.19 feet to a 5/8-inch mbar; 9. H89°20'2Sr'W adistanceof 60.01)feet to a 5/$-inch rebar; 10. S45'39'34'W a distance of 23-16 feet to,?S/S-inch reba r, 11. N89°19'43 eW a distance of 164.32 feet to a 5/8-Inch rebar; 12- 21.54 Peet along the arc of a curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 10,031-50,a delta angle of 00'07'23",a chord bearing of N89°23'25"W and a chord distance of 21.54 feet to a 5/3-inch rebar; i3- N$9°27'06"W a di5ta me of 1,358.82 feet to a brass plug; 14- N44"26'05"W a d ista nee of 23.34 feet to a brass plug on the westerly line of sand Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; 5725 North ViKEYVery Way•Sake,Idaho 83713• 208.639.6939- kmangilp.com City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits Thence following said westerly line,N00"34'56"F a distance of 299.49 feet to an aI urn inurn cap marking the Southwest 1/16th corner of said Sertinn 21; Thence leaving pia westerly line and following the northerly line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, S0'27WE a distance of 2,303.59 feet to the POW OF a GINNING, Said description contains a total of 15_756 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit B and I)y this reference Is made a part hereof. Q. 124519 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits P:�7�-031 .IRVEYICd E7SF1161155 4-091 DA MOGIFWATON.MG,AARON dALLbRP,?WZ024.E5TUW90T-KJ.--- fV hJ V M1-F Ik-I S.T� N. Pollard Ln. Z> CD o I mo 1 i Lh o � o Z r 0 LD r 2 II Cn O � Ian r Q r.5 m r U) 0- _ _ c [fyDw 75 D qD Cr p U6 rO -0 171 [Y7 �n• rn ih rTl m Q LA — Q LG t T— 1 t rn r FO ZA Sm' 5; � W 0 F 13 LP z w z z I co —k q (4 4� m r 0 efl q a a r-1 [071 I !h m LA z I m ffi O iU 0sT o I m 0 rn � o N. Levi Ave. w SEE SHEET 2 LA } Exhibit B - DA Modification Pollard North SubdIvision W 0 m� rn g j��m w A portion of the S 1/2 of SW 1/4 and the SW 1/4 of h 1/4, Sect. 1, T4N, R1W, Bhp, City of Mefidian, Ada Counter, Idaho City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 4-1)3115_mGW�_UF5%24-0e1)AmMtFICATJ__._m WJAAm#w_ �,_..— PEE SHEET 1 N. Levi Ave, S / k (ID = �- - ) 2 « \ „ \_ \ 2 G \ k §� k \ g § q � / 6 o Cr / Ln / & 4A / R ip � p E 2 R �J \ % 2 f § & § 2\ §� \ § CA Cn § � / § r 2 / o rn � 0 }2 § � § ) K $ # Ln LA G n _\ w ECo 3 _ & ƒ C;, 2 `_ I a � / f 2 2 | P w S 2 \ ) § Exhibit B - D A Modification c r ; �k7k } Pollard North Subdivision M portion ortionOftheS 2ofSW 4and the SEI / /4. k K § Sect. 2 T4N. R1W, BM, ERy of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho City of Meridian Department Rep of V11. Exhibits D. Rezone Legal Description&Exhibit Map kim E N 0 1 N E E R I N G July 10,2024 Project No.24-031 Exhibit A Lega6 Descrip#ion for Rezone to TN-R Pollard North SubdiVjMon No.1 A parcel of land situated In a portion of th a 5o A 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 and the Southwest 1/4 of thE' 5Duthea5t 1/4 of Section 21,7ownship 4 North,Range 1 West,B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at an alumTrlum cep marking the South 1/4 corner of said 5ec#ion 21 which bears S&Y2717"E a dicta nce of 2,609.39 feet from an a I urninum cap marking the Southwest corner of said 5ectia n 21,thence alo ng the westerly line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4(easterly life of the Southeast IA of the Southwest 1/4i of said Section 21,NW*32'12"E a distance of 1,317.30 feet to a S/8-Inch rebar marking the Center-South 1/16th corner of said Section 21 and being the POINT OF BEGINAIIINGx Thence leaving said westerly line(and said easterly fine)and following said northerly line of said Southwest 1./4 of the So utheast 1/4,%T24'25"E a distance of 1,30533 feet to a 5/8-inch reba r marking the Southeast 1/1611h corner of said Section 21; Thence leaving said northerly line and follcwing the easterly line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, S00'27'11"W a distance of 538.58 feet to a 51SAWh rebar on the oerltedine of W.Waverton Cr Thence leaving said easterly line and fallowing said tenterline the following six(6)courses: I. NSVKJ49"W a distance of 17.78 feet to a 5/9-inch rebar; 2. 235,10 feet along the arc of a curve to the right,so id curve having a radius of 270M feet,a delta angle cf 50'06'W",a chard bea ring of N64'25'45'W and a chord distance of 229.65 feet to a 5/8-inch rehar 3- 235,07 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 270.00 feetr a delta angle of 49'SY020,a chord bearing of NW23'12'W and a chord d i5tance of 227.72 feet to a 5f8-1 nch rebar, 4_ N89'19'43"W a distance of 781.84 feet to a 5/8-Inch rebar; 5_ 21.48 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,sa id curve having a radius of 10,000.00 feet,a delta angle of 00'07'23",a chord bearing of N89'23'75"W and a chord dicta nce of 21AS feet to a 5/8-Inch rebar, 6_ N89°27 W W a distance of 1,40035 feet to the center)ine of N.Pollard Lane; T{enw leaving said centerline of W.Waverton Dr.and fallowing the Centerline of N.Pollard lane, NDX34'WE a d Istance of 346.50 feet to the northerly line of said South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; Thence leaving said centerline and following said northerly fine,589'27'06 E a distance of 1,328.59 feet to the POINT or BEGINNING. Said panel canta1ns 21.945 acres,more or less. ` Cs�5 Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is hereby made a part of, i] rp . 13 lip* C. 5725 North piscavery Way• aalse,Idaho 33713•208.639.693n*kmengllPxK1M City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits P:%24-D31�su_EVWAmaUMa-W1 MOW m_.DWG,_.e_ammD24,Ea_ 3,- w� §] � N. L. N 7e2 ' §§ NUC' 5 rE 51 ' rn/ |�� o - - \ 2/ $ � 9$ ) G Jo ° 3 0 | 2 w // — \ E � ] � ® 2 q2 / / § %9ID k o 0 =r - ru (w%I § I CD § |- d 3 ° aET k k 6 7 S in7 7 2 § ° # m W FS kf / '+ � \ d � a / / k \ | e NJ i eRS b VI n / e z no\ § § ]o I o \ \ \ r 2 k i7 | §c > Q 2 # § 2 B N, W+ Ave. SEE SHED 2 k d Exhibit 8 - Rezone to TN-R 22 - Pollard Noh Subdivision k(\� q A portion of the 5 112 5W 4 and the 5VV 4ofSE ¢ ■`§ § / Sect. 21, T4N. RIW, B Pvl, City of Meridian, Ada County, d aho City of Meridian Department Reprt V t Exhibits -Amy FtVER_o_T5V I RUOPJF TO TPJ.ig.ULVG.AA_r.A-L_o,mblm&mum_-Na,— SEESHEET1 N. Levi Ave, E � g � m E E a — 9 § \ / ƒ k k } ' ƒ - _ § n S D ® / \ \ § m m w $ § R \ � Rn \ � \ k & / _ C < » k n o g g z v g @ / 7 A \ \cD § § \ x / $ 2 \ 3 \ 2 \f / _ � \ E _ 6 § CD / k m q S % 0 2 r- � @ § � § % zg CD $ ch rj « 'I9 2 ' U ¥ a LA ar E � c 2 § � � e % � CLW k ƒ % $ � ;- - w m § o o F 0 - - �� 7 Z 2 - 9 !z \ ) Exhibit - Rezone t0 T N-R IK `o ; ` kjI Pollard North Subdivision � 2222 ® A portion of the S Z of Sw I/4 and the SW 4 of SEA $Z [ k Sect. 21, T4N. RIW. GM, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho City of Meridian Department Rep4 V11. Exhibits E. Preliminary Plat(date: 9/6/2024) Gill 3D 9 Q90 1,Sf ED E) 0 0 0 z 2 E) ?LIB C) Cap Z z WO t 48-1 gle all mg lilt 14 W, FR-t n �n City of Meridian Department Report V11. Exhibits w V qt Ilj, j®,8�4�mjj � - ��� I I I 1331 M013933S-3NI1 HDIV _ O __ ale SCE � 4 P� ZME all 1! \\ P_ -- \------ ---- �� s 7--\ a- \ I! \\ I 1 II 11 SI \�\ III f ��EN \ \ —J v y 1 6I II A 1 9 lk� Eig II // 1 _ 2IIII 1 s�sssssl�ssssss �— — _ _ City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits All J I I I I I I I I E li31 M013E 33S-3NI1 HJ1tlW __ k �� I I I I O �?' ©l gaZI2 ,.. s wx. m axon mw m r�i mo5 s . 7 :. on Igo Ills; ��2 ilia ©� k „x m`° •p�:•�" .. " t r R 0A A B ' 8.. B " IIB $j � �®� I� � ®a � .,•�•�•3lfrP _ ��° gyp G IA� G �,�` IIG I I i .orn mtt I •an . .�l � /� �✓r Ig. q ®q 9' •. � / �i I=� .�� � sub lic.�� ��?. iliti „�' � ©s � B �" IIB-.B .0.9 §,•.�� / ,mix g S g .a®a mar,an wall. s ® Is:o s © s,•� i /fir & 5 R G II« F iIG wa.v me. .o<s� f }s� a ® g �g« 4 .m�•.TN x.R'.'.• I g- EIk 9 e kl6 aII; =^ K m aei ig y :$• I ^ .tl.g a�;-d�.-�" + � I � mOg Ills�� ixO ��s I I I s g`0 & B Q y}q$� I� $ n`t�. II$ s lis s ®'a s � q��© R I G m118 IG ^ il- I R �•S R � P°Sly IIt ,N �a II$ Ili mxn k mn Ig g iexv k avi u,�I - s u� Ills k Os. k t OH Ila-. ff 0 € �IRY II$ •"• •V4 I � I� mn I nn � >r�"°,� $ Oi R a I„ B IB J'I wn Ae'n II ail g gg gg h� I I N$ 9��. A •�•x,••.IP. � ' •.Q$.•H � R—-s ^-k 7�y - 6-nan3mvnnxays I---J I ' .R •mV$ $ 8 lJy__I16 eeljI I -K - 1rc< xrc< ro III s$�B§ 8�§ � 91,Y F� Jog IT ���i�3 N1 'All 3 & OS Rr $�fr i ��0� R I o 6 I g' s "�� JJG I I'I � K .mm•av« <n.•�� it d � a p�5y ����� iga� &q � �� 1H91H 3h09V 335-3NIl H]17W z Wq � �E a� $$ 3 R€�` R„c Jig a i a� E€�e.�fie�5 �_ Sn m =� �§ §� 275§ City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits :\U � )� A� � �t \ �z ! �!! ) � � � \ .� r T— q06 % § r (, 0 �\ § �} \ If (- ƒ / j . Lu .! § k 2 % � \ /| Clt of Meridian Department Reprt V11. Exhibits F. Common Driveway Exhibit � N 9T ET lal E 1181HX3 AtlMMINO g3btlHS ltlld kHVNIW I138d N��p� x ❑ `c' a1`NdlalUN w NOISWO9nS H1avN❑8"Od = a r wy = +u n a� zz 3w� c3 n S tN/i� as�m 0 �UN�Y m� °gm=s 1N3W35tl3 NItlHO a31tlM� 0 3;IMtlO II QH:O4' QZ .01 Of, H J r 6Tl 6�PI d"PI 6RI�E ., 091 6YI E �B'PI 5PI 8...�_ 301S T �. ¢ � I In oII W fI LU off . I I ceLU i �' ❑ — ❑ ' al $C�]1 3 0 ~e N e v2 P •Is'� V I m m � II pp m I Ky, ww C I Y It U Q ¢ n `0Z City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Landscape Plan(dated: 7/25/24) lip 10 lilt r yy9ig7g1{ jlj l ia� 1 © ® I ® .::. ! 1i��i4;91�� 1�iSE'1�����iS11��Q3 h O � r W9f IW� A- d C I e I tl F V� yg ��n. ..vim'.j ' o000 0 0 o ^ o00 0000 5F: 9g i i ug 33 �tltlp I ❑ I I ® II 5F Y i EE �i•E — — Sid 5F�� S � 0,� �Od R ild C i G (W I I g� S F8 qol d E 5 i*' W 7E I" Cy' U Rr� R6 yyy �,E¢1 tl 1 � QD 3 ggY d I.^ $i.fig� ����5 �.■ys r�I §epp g � �_ � i[� �eaE.W.§ 9 i e 1 I I 2 $ F p ]] C Ali tl 5g N I City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits �g 3 111 .i ' €3e $ s .P'•3 Y y A ➢1 F�� �� i� �� �- �� 1 B� � � !!3 �i �� 4 �1 �pp ppjj e � !gg t !y!y yypj8 9 ,1pp q q1-p 3.1 �9 3 p�} A 8g A F E A V W � g LJ � � 2 E o- 't II I J OD I � I; I I d•r ° — -- --- I € q m e R I — �•1i.7C I '4 — f 1 ® I — 2 kg : City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits aw�m �s-arlln,rw r C�V.c� � 'g::-fit:- _�-• I �.C,1 � � 3 Hoa I. g -N: ggs = 0 4¢ x a G 12{p� f fd tl -------•--- f tlS �43ee �� - I"* ^•'i��. 1_�f' ... .r I �y Cj�g 9�y kp� ae3C. p � 3 I p f v I li I I li I Ir I I I I :•• i I , i I A::. �� I iS I ❑ it � � � � � � r H I I 'Nko i� 16 1 _ ,�' :� `pry}s _ _ -- '.. <• : .." . =- — — — I�r ~~~QT1dd1H1533S-�111 H71�1 ——————`—— City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits - - - - - - - - - - - - - - v 1122 14- I IN CIO ID T91-L. 54 T1 MIN 1111 11 11111mill L LU J ———-———————- rm mem —————-—— L o:�M City of Meridian I Department Report V11. Exhibits �•— � ® } , : / £ , � � � ® ` $ \ NP \ „ « . . §� »e � � '• � , $ 4»@ @ $ �§A ® �k & ` v-�� � � • . k 2 ' & ` e ® ' . i . § § All } . � 2 � ) m k !§ / ! a ( � e * 7 � City of Meridian Department Reprt V11. Exhibits :,� |� �| / , ] O U .1 � Q0 0 D | § §� � 0 | / § . � § ' n � -Nj 0 $qƒU§ § !�\ ; §§ h[ Q Ml4ik , b P16 8$ /§ w : § . b £ : % m! - \a \ § N \ § - j,; 0 0 City of Meridian Department Reprt V t Exhibits H. Open Space& Site Amenity Exhibits(dated: Ju 1 2024) .� # / y / lei ® } { t . CA > ± C +� « + w « � » e s � a s » + e , & , y m»e4 e - , & • , 4 . ,| e \ « ^ \ m e m « 7. » . e ƒ m =§eeeeeneeeee e ; / ~ 2 § ). } ) ) }! ! f� City of Meridian Department Reprt V11. Exhibits r. r. - -- t l $ BRIGHTON POLLARD NORTH—Central Park W_ -, X y" + B RI G H TO N POLLARD NORTH-Carriage Lane Ham ila�2w mallow kill fi yr Oil 110,11 7;,; BRIGHTON POLLARD NORTH-Carriage Lane Duet Homes _ u wpm pol ♦BRIG HTON POLLARD NORTH-Conventional Homes op rLl 46 I -- BRIGHTON POLLARD NORTH - Home Types ot ilife _ �I�Illallllll� lituu11CAll- r ra ] BRIG HTON POLLARD NORTH -Carriage Lane "B" Duets ----------- MEN� m _ _ ME A llp MINE -MEN® � I all �= - - - - - 111 BRIGHTON POLLARD NORTH -Carriage Lane "C" ���rrl��Wl���Y�� �I I■I■I■I � I■I■I■ -NilLIIl� r:71rI�N�' I LMiM�li- ^�wt�Iwl � ii il�llll _Illy111111111 �IIIIIIIIIUIII� -��-111,�FIIIIl1111. __ „ . -� BRIGHTON POLLARD NORTH -Conventional"A" s s - s -- - 1 - 13 City of Meridian Department Report A D F City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Foldesi Reserve (H-2024-0055) by Jeff Hatch, located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0055 A. Request: Annexation of 3.31 acres of land for the construction of approximately 46,000 sq. ft. of flex space in the I-L zoning district. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: January ITEM # ON AGENDA: 3 PROJECT NAME: Foldesi Reserve (H-2024-0055) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--, DEPARTMENT REPORT o a H o �r1' HEARING 1/7/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor& City Council Area of Impact }= City Limits FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O analysis ' r 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Jeff Hatch SUBJECT: H-2024-0055 Foldesi Reserve LOCATION: Located at 3915 N. Ten Mile Road in North '/z of the SE'/4 of Section 34, TAN.,R.1W. 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 3.31 acres of land for the construction of approximately 46,005 square feet of industrial space in the I-L zoning district,By Jeff Hatch. B. Recommendation Staff: Approval with Conditions. Commission: Approval. C. Decision Council: City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial/Flex Space - Existing Zoning RUT in Ada County VII.A.2 II. Proposed Zoning I-L Adopted FLUM Designation Mixed Use Non-Residential(MUNR) VII.A.3 Proposed FLUM Designation Mixed Use Non-Residential(MUNR) Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 7/16/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/23/2024 Site posting date 12/9/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District IV.D • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Existing driveway to N. Ten Mile Rd(arterial); - Consolidating the 3 access points to a single access point. • Traffic Level of Service Better than E - ITD Comments Received Yes Meridian Public Works Wastewater IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site. r • Impacts or Concerns No Meridian Public Works Water IV.B • Distance to Mainline Available at the site. ` • Impacts or Concerns Yes: Connection to Ten Mile Road and to the water main on the south boundary will be required at time of development. Note: See section IV. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received or see public record https:llweblink.meridiancioy.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=365958&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCioX. City of Meridian I Department Report STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject property is designated as Mixed Use Non-Residential on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed zoning of Light Industrial(I-L)is consistent with the FLUM. The ui. applicant is proposing to construct approximately 46,005 square feet of industrial space and self- storage(storage condos). These uses are listed as allowed in the I-L zoning in the UDC and Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is surrounded by self-service storage facilities as this property is within the proximity of the Cities wastewater plant. Industrial spaces and self-storage facilities are a desired use specified in the Mixed-Use Non-Residential designation,as noted above. These spaces provide employment opportunities and valuable spaces for small-scale industrial businesses. Each user will be evaluated at the time of applying for certificate of occupancy. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History N/A Acreage 3.31 acres B. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The site currently contains seven(7)residential and accessory structures. Prior to the issuance of the building permit,these structures shall be removed. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The applicant has indicated the proposed uses for the site intends to be industrial spaces and self-storage buildings. The use of industrial buildings and self-storage facilities(storage condos) aligns with the Mixed-Use Non-Residential(MUNR) future land use designation, which accommodates a range of commercial and industrial users. This project not only provides employment and industrial options within city limits but also advances the city's economic goals and meets the needs of its residents. Specifically,it complies with Policy 3.07.01D,which promotes the preservation of industrial land by discouraging non-industrial uses and emphasizing light manufacturing,distribution, flex-space, and base employment. Additionally, it aligns with Policy 3.03.01E,which encourages infill development within the city. The property's location adjacent to N. Ten Mile Road enhances its accessibility and supports the local industrial landscape, addressing the demand for such developments in both the immediate area and the wider community. Furthermore, industrial buildings and self- storage facilities are permitted in the I-L zoning district which supports the applicant proposal. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards of the I-L zoning district in UDC Table 11-3B-3.Based on the concept plan and elevations, the applicant is meeting the 35 foot building setback, 50 foot height limit, and has chosen to do a water conserving design to reduce the landscape buffer to 12 %feet along Ten Mile in conformance with the UDC. City of Meridian I Department Report 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The applicant has proposed the uses of Industrial space and Self Service Storage Facility but staff is not limiting them to these uses as any allowed uses in the I-L zoning can be established. UDC 11-4-3-34: Storage Facility, Self-Service a. Storage units and/or areas shall not be used as dwellings or as a commercial or industrial place of business. The manufacture or sale of any item by a tenant from or at a self-service storage facility is specifically prohibited. The applicant is proposing the storage facility/building to be for storage condos which will be for personal use and not for business purposes. b. On site auctions of unclaimed items by the storage facility owners shall be allowed as a temporary use in accord with Chapter 3,Article E, "temporary use requirements", of this Title. The applicant will comply with this if and when this happens at the facility. c. The distance between structures shall be a minimum of twenty-five(25)feet. The applicant meets this standard. d. The storage facility shall be completely fenced,walled,or enclosed and screened from public view. Where abutting a residential district or public road,chainlink shall not be allowed as fencing material. The storage building will have enhanced architecture, and the roll-up doors will screened from public view. This is not a typical storage building as it will be used for storage condos which is a more specialized and heightened use. e. If abutting a residential district,the facility hours of public operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m.to 11:00 p.m. Not applicable. £A minimum twenty-five-foot wide landscape buffer shall be provided where the facility abuts a residential use,unless a greater buffer width is otherwise required by this title. Landscaping shall be provided as set forth in subsection 11-3B-9.0 of this Title. Not applicable. g. If the use is unattended,the standards in accord with Section 11-3A-16, "self-service uses", of this Title shall also apply. The applicant will comply with these standards. h. The facility shall have a second means of access for emergency purposes as determined by the Fire Marshal. The fire department has reviewed the concept plan and will work with the applicant on a second means of access.Additional details will be reviewed with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. i. All outdoor storage of material shall be maintained in an orderly manner so as not to create a public nuisance. Materials shall not be stored within the required yards. Stored items shall not block sidewalks or parking areas and may not impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The applicant is not proposing outdoor storage for the larger self-storage building. j. The site shall not be used as a"vehicle wrecking or junk yard" as herein defined. The applicant will comply with this standard. k. For any use requiring the storage of fuel or hazardous material,the use shall be located a minimum of one thousand(1,000)feet from a hospital. Not applicable. City of Meridian I Department Report C. Design Standards Analysis 1. Structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Based on the concept plan,the applicant appears to comply with the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-19. The applicant has positioned no more than 50%of the total off-street parking between building facades and abutting streets. Additionally,the building on the southern portion of the site exceeds the 30%building frontage requirement. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along N. Ten Mile Road, an arterial street. This buffer shall be landscaped per the standards in UDC 11-3B-7C. The applicant has chosen to incorporate the water conserving design standards into this buffer which allows the buffer to be reduced by 50%. The concept plan shows a 12 '/foot buffer meeting this requirement. However, the existing landscaping between the sidewalk and Ten Mile Road will be required to be brough into compliance and landscaped per UDC 11-3B-7C. The landscaping will be evaluated with the certificate ofzoning compliance and shall be landscaped per UDC 11-3B-5-2B-0. ii. Parking lot landscaping Landscaping is required to be provided along all parking areas per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8. The proposed landscape plan does not meet the minimum requirements. The south landscape buffer shall be widened to 7 feet and the parking stall shall be reduced to 17 feet. The landscaping will be evaluated with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. iii. Tree preservation Per UDC 11-3B-10,the applicant shall preserve existing trees four-inch caliper or greater from destruction during the development. Mitigation shall be required for all existing trees four-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site with equal replacement of the total calipers lost on site up to an amount of one hundred(100)percent replacement(Example: Two(2)ten-inch caliper trees removed may be mitigated with four 5-inch caliper trees, five(5)four-inch caliper trees, or seven(7)three-inch caliper trees).Deciduous specimen trees four-inch caliper or greater may count double towards total calipers lost,when planted at entryways,within common open space, and when used as focal elements in landscape design. A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the final plat detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. iv. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along N. Ten Mile Road. 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6 requires one space for every two thousand(2,000) sq. ft. of gross floor area in industrial districts. The applicant is proposing 94 parking spaces on the concept plan which exceeds the 23 spaces that are required with the building(46,005 square feet).Additionally, the applicant anticipates potential commercial users will use portions City of Meridian I Department Report of the site in the future which is why the parking is in excess. The uses will be analyzed as they are proposed within the tenant spaces. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C.Bicycle parking is not depicted and the plans shall be revised to incorporate the location of the bicycle parking with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance submittal that meet these requirements. 4. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Goals 5.01.02C and 2.09.03A of the comprehensive plan promote area beautification and community identity through heightened design standards providing distinct and engaging identities. In response,the developer is proposing three industrial buildings with a mix of one-and two- story tenant spaces comprised of stucco,brick veneer, stucco wainscot,metal panels,and metal panel roofing with moderate to large setbacks from the street, and frontages exceeding the required 20%windows along the streets. Primary entrances are oriented toward the parking lots rather than toward the loading docks. The Architectural Standards Manual requires modulation in the surface plane at no less than 50 ft. intervals. There should be at least 2 pedestrian-scale architectural features,and physical distinctions to anchor the building. There should be at least two different field materials,with at least one accent material. The proposed elevations appear to meet the architectural manual. However,the applicant shall submit the architectural standards manual checklist with the design review application to ensure compliance with these standards. 5. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The submitted concept plan shows fencing on the Northwest portion of the site but does not provide details. The applicant shall include fencing details with the submittal of the certificate of zoning compliance. D. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC I1-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Goal 6.01.02B emphasizes reducing the number of access points onto arterial streets by utilizing strategies such as cross-access agreements, access management, and the creation of frontage and backage roads,while also improving connectivity between local and collector streets. Access is proposed off N. Ten Mile Road(an arterial street)through a single curb cut. The applicant has condensed the three access points to N. Ten Mile into a single access point in the center of the property. This was a requirement from both ACHD and the City of Meridian with this application. While this property was not granted access from the storage facility to the south it was granted cross access from the north for when the storage facility redevelops in the future, staff finds the proposed entrance to be in compliance with the UDC and comprehensive plan. City of Meridian I Department Report Additionally, cross-access shall be stubbed to the property to the north and south.While this may not be pertinent in the near term,if or when the storage units redevelop,the cross-access agreement will be essential to limiting access points on Ten Mile. The Meridian Fire Department has requested secondary access to the site. The applicant and staff will work with MFD to find the best location for this before CZC submittal. 2. Multiuse Pathways,Pathways, and Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-5, UDC 11-3A-8, UDC 11-3A-17, Comp Plan): The site has an existing detached 5-foot sidewalk along N. Ten Mile Road which has been determined to be sufficient from the city parks department. Typically, 10-foot detached multi- use pathways are required along arterial and collector roads. However,the 5-foot detached sidewalk was recently constructed, and the parks department deemed it as acceptable at this time. Additionally,the two curb cuts that are being removed shall be replace with curb, gutter, sidewalks, and landscaping with the first certificate of zoning compliance application. There is no pedestrian connection from this sidewalk to the front entrances for any of the suites. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian connection point to the entrances of the suites. If the pedestrian walkway crosses vehicular driving surfaces, it is required to be distinguished from the vehicular driving surface through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks as set forth in UDC 11-3A-1913.4. E. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 1v. 3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb,gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat or certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: City of Meridian I Department Report a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. b. Any future development of the site must comply with the City of Meridian ordinances in effect at the time of the development. c. A Certificate of Zoning Compliance and Design Review application(s) shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of building permit applications for this site. Building permits may be issued prior to recordation of the final plat;however,no Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued prior to recordation of the final plat for the lot on which the building(s) is located,per requirement of the most recent amendment to the DA(H-2023- 0074). d. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,the applicant shall construct driveway stubs to the north and south property lines and record a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granting accesses to the north(Parcel#S0434417201) and south(Parcel#S0434417605) properties in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Ten Mile Road. Copies of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. e. All existing structures shall be removed from the property prior to issuance of the first building permit. f. The applicant shall consolidate all the access points into a single access point as shown on the concept plan. At the submittal of the first certificate of zoning compliance,the access points being removed shall be replaced with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping in compliance with the UDC. g. The property is allowed to develop with any permitted and conditional uses in the I-L zoning district as represented in UDC Table 11-2C-2. Planning Division comments related to future application submittals: - Provide emergency access to the site as requested by the Meridian Fire Department. City of Meridian I Department Report B. Meridian Public Works ANNEXATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Wastewater ............. • Distance to Sewer Directly adjacent Services • 5ewer 5hed • Estimated Project See application Sewer ERU's + WRRF Declining Balance + Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan/Facility Plan Impacts/concerns Water + Distance to Water Available at the site. Services • Pressure Zone • Estimated Project See application Water ERU's + Water Quality None • Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Pla n + Impacts/Concerns Connection to Ten Mile Rd and to the water main on the south boundary will be required attirne of development. City of Meridian Department Report C. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District ,FF-1. NOV 71 20?.4 I TYCLERKS OFUCE 1503 FIRST STREET SOUTH NAMPA,E DAHO M651-4395 FAX 420"634M92 rMid-Pr$ Off7CE: Nciripa 2OB-466-7ML Novembs.-r 19,2Q24 SHOP. Non'pa 206 4a6-086 Chris Johnson,City CIcrk City of Meridian 3� EJ-Broadway Avenue., `.suite 102 Meridian.ID 83 2-2619 RE: H-207A-OV&Foldesi Roerrv;39 15 N.Ten Mile Road To Whom It May Concern: Providing a]i dorm drainage is rciainnd on-site thcrc will be no impact to Nampa&. McridiHa Irrigation District(NM ID).Therefore, no further review will he required at this tinie- If My surMce dtaiaage leaves dtr site, NM ID rcgiFires a Filcd sand Use Changc Applicatimi for review prior to Final platting, All privalc lalertlls ark] wmAc ways must be protcctcd. It is recommended that irigatiolti water he available to all developments within NMID. Developers must comply udth Idaho Code 3 E- 3 05- Please call with any further questions at(208)466-4663. Sincerely, Stc,"C Pardew Developrnent Coordinator Nampa& Meridian Irrigation District SPI gnf Cc: Of eel Fi le APPRCMMA1E IRRr,--.kf r CRES D. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) City of Meridian I Department Report Pre dard ACHD Alrxis mcn, is missioner MirarAa CM,YrC64brLns1*an# ]im Nansgn,Commissioncr Kimc GNdthOrptr.Colnmleeionlr 'Vro-i Q3V4 M[ICIf1fW1'Comm144i0nrtr Date:October 21,2024 To,Jeff Hatch and Steve Thiessen, Hatch Architecture and Design Staff Contact:Sam Standal,Assistant Traffic Engineer Project Description: Foldesi Reserve RA Trip Generation: This de+.+eloprnent is estimated to generate 223 vehicle trip6 per day. 23 veh icle trips per hour in the PM peak hour,based on the Institute ofTranspot tiOn, Engineers Trip Generation Manua1.11t',edition_ ■ RoadwayACHID Policies If yes,is mitigation required Area Service yes Livable Street Area roads will meetACHD's 1-05 • ■ • _ -• Comments= As this application is for annexation and rezone only,the tables above reflect existing conditions without the proposed project_ This table will be updated to reflect the development and its impact as part of a future development V. application_ can nett n g you to more FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: City of Meridian I Department Report 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the Applicant's proposal to annex I acre of land with I-L zoning for the development of 46,005 square feet of industrial buildings is consistent with the General Industrial FL UM designation for this property. (See section III above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment to I-L and conceptual development plan generally complies with the purpose statement of the I-L district in that it will encourage industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are operated entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures and is accessible to an arterial street(i.e. Ten Mile Road). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed industrial use should be conducted entirely within a structure. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the city. vi. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommend approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement. B. Commission: B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5t'',2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject annexation request. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor: Steve Thiessen and Jeff Hatch b. In opposition:None C. Commenting: Steve Thiessen and Jeff Hatch d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application: Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. None^ 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: City of Meridian I Department Report a. The applicant will no longer pursue storage condos as they do not want to provide secondary access. The building will be used as industrial flex space allowing for any use permitted in the zone. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report `� 1111l.1111�1 ' in _ h - / V•- F �' II .c r,-� �'�` 'ice a �,�� •.� `•1 t �-rw"` a ; _-� 1 _ LLI MCMI�L-L-AN e In■nuinrlrr I■rr ■I■■■■■■■■. ■EaEE■■ -• • •• rllnm tllllll I 11rr1R � .� `��1E■■1 ' e • �'inln rrllR/�ya�f y��u■ All �MPON rgrrir� Jr � ■■ n= ulr rrrll uqupr 4 �:7-ti/ � �r+���� iiiiii �q�:IIl1RRR�����♦1`�„ 1 u , , •�ii„l��iiinnrr ��`IIlr1@L'I;��IT�'p� � � .� luu�pu uunq► � I►ri�iiitr « W mu -lruuur Q/• + ♦�` C a rills ICgills BE Ilrn■■■r�`•� `►1111R � �G ir���iunrrrrlrq, I#��IIR��� J m �1N� ���.iiii ��t��0,♦♦ a IV mrrnm■ �� ■� J ■ , 1 1�1 USTICK nrrrllnar -■�.�.r.. l�l � . ..:. ■�.lr � ■a.E■ epu�.• � •f..rr Z i • ■uuu.qa nrr■E'f . �����/� � ■ llaea!-— !Orri ii■a� F. wf���ilElr ii:�1R ■ �.'...i1/,i■. a rr ouu11 ■n■ bi ♦ ■■rer rem I■.n rs:lr1►•S ■.r � ♦hu.�..... i4 ..■ .�.��+� � ��♦��in�'4r� ennrrrl-O■ llllllllt�♦ •n. 1ia�oai Dana a�nnn ra.�:..• .�Eu■r arrr.nnn s■■■•If'rl)� n Purr�`�,� i . . ■ ■■■■ / 1 J ! ■unq arum .' .,'■■ �{1 : ■E•■■lllr■■■■llrr' `. . I■E■■■. t �} �ilrr / ■ r ��♦ � :C a► � � �: ■ nm���4+t■L�ls, .��t►��iV*�aiwai�.`:' n ♦as :L �n■nrrllpra '.�'. soiii.:i��i p��QIIj i```► r+♦r:��! 4� raw ♦ \IIIIIIII __C ills' �Il 1111■J� �S♦ ,■ • . • • _ • .p IIIIIIII '-=Alllll� ��' llllJ J� �� go me �IIIIIP r+"�IIIIII+ 1 �- /T� „■ r,■r 111 a rLlxnu � 1 ■11�=IJ 1���iir s■ --`,`=='�IIUIy , -;. � .II■ I - ;� � rll ail■,■„�, m - �.:, Ora,■ :11 Ip rune�I`� `.Ir urn f 1 1 a■■ 'ANrI�m�i? .. ^! �^' nu ��_•III llr:: :�. Ilrgl�NIJj�. �soon el►N F AIASi,� - • - • ,■■1 • Q . Ill �■ .-:::r 1 all 11 a Jp:e W glllrrry, milliUs ■■11 Il■rJ�JIr�..:1`ii■. t � "cn t ■II �� ��,�Liiiiin + • •• •►uu'.'. ..�V W11111111111■i�'= I I ••1�ri��'.•C vw =imiiiw ii wllll nqp.. + a 111■�p ,r ' m1Sjjry n1u1 ►►a♦ +► 91111 -■uu�rxmxuy iv�� noIN w Z fl• / nun■■ nn nm :� �4n■'n■nu■� y /nw/ .. � o inn,■nn nn■n /■r,■{ r.= rr�:oON n■■i ■iR' W �a�+,■ ♦...■..I ♦i iiiiii :-w unrd ♦ rr►gar i ra � �n,wr"-■..��� r -■nwr■■ ♦�■n riven � ■ ■..a■I.1hu +:■■■.■ � r/t no rr■#1 ♦ rr■. ■:■y; /hn■�■nu■■■1pi.:R,11►r �■ ::a:r:■ ♦♦ i 4 '';wry ■ ■ nwr��r,r► a uu■■�♦♦• �{■■ ■■nuu L■.: iiii ■■ ■■r w •■R IInR� inoll nurl:/n • n■��$■■■^m nna►./nnm ■i.•: :■■.■i : M : .Q •Ununm R■„ I Illlj■■■� a■ �.�i::::�: f♦ �fu■ryllu„■11"■nnu11 ■ - ,awn��*i �* a■•�1 ur■gr rumu ♦ ♦♦ter..��: ��►♦ '� nn\ �1{a� /1�,1+�'�►�+i4*tr •♦f+ � ♦dpr. \! ♦♦� :\♦ oil ii■u■h♦ - ones • - • avows i �t { r ♦ai.' �w fiiA■ ===%M ire.■=�_::= - ' �.rlrrr�lrrrrnrrrrrrrrrrrrr ��.� , �rnrrrm��r���=�_i�llullnu illllulr�l_��f� inlilr�- 111■u■Iwl; gmnnnl_-r r flgiAll um� ��� ■a lli i1r!►I �1 � •• • •• • J 1 �x■■AAI11 1►/��=C - �?- 11��'�III�./ly ■ T!'� llllllllr ;��Iluln _�nii �u iiiii►j� Iln irm- - iunnl ==,non- Ii1 ♦�i��f . . _. .. ill Ir!uuuuuu nu1�13:1e- .eel�rot_l�c,ae_�� I♦ �r:1 IIry�h/,����`�ii „nnr in l. . n Ifr 5 1 ♦ l7/un■--onIn-�;�nn M�It r■ /1■ alal��►� llar�� 1 ■a, y/ raj■.r.■Ilg1 -�I� fal lli � rrlllrli=+I Il ,■ „irr,rrrTlrr:�'� ''�f '�.ioi# ' in lrrJJj,��` Ii . ":• Syr ti No IIIm In rlllrgrr/iiJj. a,l '�■■■■■■ ■41'11j+��■Np II a' nl,u■.p� ,� lln■/►11 Inm�/� liiiirJ�Ir-'�nir u,.w ■ IIl 1u4�.�� �` I ,IUO �11I1111R� ►I f ■.■■mw. V = 1 Q • 11111nI1�,■ Illflrj�l���••'��i�•,W Y:_= hull=_= 1'rlr�'' t / ♦�-J..� _ � N■11111■11 IInJII�n..r1 au C3`-'= =i__ ::1�� TIr10�\r � 1► ��\�'7 nw>:�:Z Q _r nnu =] • � �I/y J�Iw C.HI■■�OG1Frt .__ I = nml _ Igll ►t �'4� / rn a■-■-UtrJ �um J;= limn = ��\ � �j1 rra:�r , , ♦ yi Ln,w�- -, �=.�.Vim:ur mnrrn __ � i ' �t41� ;;'nnnl ♦IIp►�-�jl� �lmni r7 i~riiw R .+ ,I i••p��., ryn yaw: C U= 'i,wl IIOIIIIIIM • Ij,;. t„I�-_-:\7C7L7-%�i^.I III a,�CS� 7i rU illlllll�+ Lr Iflq:-�`p■': Im IN �1 [ na•' � 1IIIuu1.n ,1� I i+ rr._i._ �_ uu - USTI�CK � ��� I ran■,pnu� ��ul�,� l►ea►�! ''�!`._ irur ■AAit[S;' ♦�■■a�s a �tl,■,[I r 1■111ra.�wnmrri■iuu■nnn�Il � QIIIIIIu �narr ��' ■u■ .,� .■�■w 1:J' o IN■■■ ■ r •u/■AI� ■■■uum nn rn■■ww �•�_- ..�1 � ,. 1 aunt�.._ � - u a■ ■■■..rq i! I � � Ar�*non■■ ■a r. ■■ �.■ :�f-7 A/,■r r ♦ 111■ I ;....•r ♦* •♦♦ II- I �.nn■►�f r u�♦ ■r■ra rr■■ice ■,► �t► ai■i ■R�w w, �r 1,nn■►♦•• I_epe■n,■I!♦�J��j nr►r ! ■IaM •♦ i�l\r•r♦ru■■... lj /nraw:::..I �FI�r. � r� a on nr tii �♦ 4■//V..1 tlr,n� � r 1/■ aa■■■..�1■•�hu :.....i��.�.:i■■■L♦:f♦:. _ �■nwrr■ •I �k�♦ v■ ■/: no r[:O ♦ �1i■,�■■. ■::+t N■n�■nrrnal ■■ w111r ■■.. C■nw,■■ ■ C�i i ♦i f iu�1 r ►� rr■ r w■r��■■�M j -nrr■■ ■■ ■aqm a • 1� ■ `� i■�: \ � ♦�',•�nw 9,■ ■ over.■r,■► 1• ■■■■uu■q♦�a+i� ■ -.r umu■ ■■■■w:■ ::.: �j�� ■ w� ►d rR n� uunnl:/�„l�i r���J■Illllj■■■� •~{�i■ar;r■uun■ a■;1■,wuuu■■■■ {•rn ■■■ i'a-. .>. ,,,,,■„■■R■fi ■www/■- �rwww■ ,,,,r/ ■■/ f■ah„a nna►■anq■n,,,n1 Ia■a wr�wi:::=r, � � � w-f11■Ir1 Ilff'llJlr �nn■CI , p � �� � � a■un■■+uunul#Iw ,p■n ��♦'♦♦a■■■- ra. r nnl mp �:I��ii:� - '=Z�.u, .■a■■■. a .p �� wryly ♦ •tR ■:� m■ •` ••QO■■. �i♦ � � :�:� --€W um gun■:1� • 11 II r:I� sti ♦♦i■`:�r'■'�- ,� • 'C.r■: ` ♦ ■ ratl■,■IIIIpR r. -.--■�__ ■p,itjup[■ � p{ I��y • t C � ■: ■f t ■,,,,, ♦ .::::i'■Rnu ulrH■ urr■■n■R� aaa�r..ralr♦♦{•♦a ♦tii:.�■"'I r L .y. 1 n + � AZ' DepartmentCity of Meridian 10 C. Service Accessibility Report overall Scare: 1 5th Percentile Description e. Location Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOI-v Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft. from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 140 yr floodplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. RED Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master street= GREEN plan) matches existing of lanes) School Walking Proximity From 1/2 to 1 mile walking YELLOW Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Wa I ka hility Park within 1/2 mile OR Neighborhood Parkwithin GREEN 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report D. Site Plan(date: 9/20/2024) WE RECAP � a SSFsES o ❑ =r,,;• Qk ■UILUING e� _ - 6UILOIN6 ` SYM6CL LEGE14D rt fJ w ■ I{ l I z RIRLDNC AREA RECAP ° i ..- _. n- ------------------------ l ------ BUILDING 1 l'I AREA RECAP I �I: { o .3 ❑ III III LL o { :'I A LO City of Meridian Department Report E. Building Elevations(date: 10/31/2024) .t SPECIRIC:ATHlNS Fg �t J x..r.cn.m.xeona..r v� Im -7n ® ®� a If 1 W - a $ u - o J v k. AL a&LajL k a -�U L .. .� = :0 ....... P _ p ❑ _ 0 Ll A 4.0 IXiERIC]R FINLLi SPEC TICATIONS $ kgkg - $59 5k5 LI r-a onn.m u n u o u 0 m ® on j4 } A 4.1 City of Meridian Department Report F. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map 1RDURR Projoct Noc 240333 Datc:October 10,2024 Pagc 1 of 1 ANNEKATION DESCRIPTION A parod of land located in the N112 of the SE114 of Section 34,Tnwrush p 4 North Range 1 West Boisc McridiarL City of Moridiarc Ada County,Idahn,nwwc particularly dcsoibod as"lows: COMMENCINGatthe southeast comcf of said Soction 34;thenc�-alongthe cast boundaryoFthc 5 E114. A) N.W 5Z59'E,14SZ132 fcctta the south boundary of said N112otttrc SEif4and the POINT OF f3EGINNING.1hrncr-alarg said boundary, 11 N,B9°lb'10'W_.425DD6 N!octb knee,having mid boundary- 21 N-01°5T30'W_,33a11 Fcakthcncc, 3� 5 69°1&1-5'E 441-57 text tb said cast boundary of the SEV4=thenco,alorg said boundary, 4) S_0752'59'W 33276k-ettn the POINT OFBESINNINa OWf AINIMGc 3.31 liucs. � 13765 /11 372•_CrO31-ors%len? \anr7.Id93=UT I 201.44-63F, —vrw,ordrra:nm City of Meridian I Department Report ANNEXATION EXHIBIT SKETCH LQrrATE❑IN THE N 1 r2 OF THE SE 14 DF SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH,RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIOIAN_CITY OF MERIDIAN IE 20241 C 34 35 $ A95R 5��1 2667.19' r� SiOSi'14•I5� 44i.57' pG 1 I � � I� I i 7 2W w lull' UI L � ANNFXATM PARCEL n; 3.31 ACRES ] =m i RM5'11)'w 425DIV ! S F *+{ R i3765 +�� ,mow 35 W.U9YIM AD QR �� DU 3321L 9ROAUMDRE WAY NAMPA IDANp I=? 11394426144 I WBWJSHDUHHAZGN City of Meridian Department Report W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for 330 N. Linder Rd. (H-2024-0048) by Nicholas Rinker, located at 330 N. Linder Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0048 A. Request: Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L (Light Industrial) zoning district to operate a Vehicle Sale or Rental and Service Facility. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: January ITEM # ON AGENDA: 4 PROJECT NAME: 330 N. Linder Rd. (H-2024-0048) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name e- ro 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CE�� PIDIAN*,,--, iDAHO DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 1/7/2025 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council Area of Impact City Limits FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner 0 Analysis LLI 208-884-5533 nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Nicholas Rinker SUBJECT: H-2024-0048 330 Linder Road Annexation C. LOCATION: Located at 330 N. Linder Road in the SE 0 '/4 of Section 12, T.3N.,R.IW. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Annexation of 1.0 acre of land with an I-L(Light Industrial)zoning for the proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service. B. Issues/Waivers The applicant has received a letter from the northern property owner to allow for a reduced landscape buffer to the residential property. This reduction will be from 25 feet to 5 feet.With this letter, staff finds the intent of the dimensional standards is being met. The applicant is seeking Council waiver to reduce this buffer as requested. The existing building is proposed to remain which will cause it to be non-conforming with the 35- foot street setback. C. Recommendation Staff. Approval. Commission Recommendation: Approval. D. Decision Council: City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview 11. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Industrial/Car Dealership - Existing/Proposed Zoning R1 in Ada County V.A.2 Future Land Use Designation General Industrial V.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 8/26/2024 Neighborhood Meeting 9/5/2024 Site posting date 11/23/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District III.0 • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Shared access with the property to the south. - • Traffic Level of Service Better than E. - ITD Comments Received Yes - Meridian Public Works Wastewater III.B • Distance to Mainline Available at site • Impacts or Concerns Yes: See comments below. Meridian Public Works Water III.B • Distance to Mainline Available at site - • Impacts or Concerns No Note: See section III. City/Agency Comments&Conditions for comments received or see public record hgps://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=362253&dbid=0&redo=Meridian0ty. City of Meridian I Department Report III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview This property is designated as General Industrial on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). The use of vehicle sales or rental and service is consistent with the comprehensive plan for the general industrial designation. The subject site is among several Industrial properties along Linder Road in the immediate area. The proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and services is a permitted use in the I-L zoning which is the zoning the applicant is requesting. In conjunction with the existing industrial users surrounding this property,the proposed use satisfies the general industrial designation on the comprehensive plan. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History N/A Acreage 1.0 acre B. History and Process The subject property is part of an enclave area surrounded by City annexed property. Annexation of this land will provide more efficient provision of City services. Industrial uses exist to the west across N. Linder Rd and to the south and east; single-family residences exist to the north and in Ada County. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): The existing residence is proposed to remain as the main office for the vehicle sales business. The building shall abandon well and sceptic and connect to city services at the time of annexation in accord with UDC. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): The proposed use of vehicle sales or rental and service is a permitted use in the I-L zoning district and aligns with the surrounding area. By adding additional industrial properties in the city,this project contributes to the community's employment and economic growth. Specifically, it adheres to Policy 3.07.01D,which encourages the preservation of industrial land use areas by discouraging non-industrial users. Additionally,the proposal is consistent with Policy 3.06.02D,which recommends locating industrial uses close to state highways and the rail corridor. The property's location adjacent to Linder Road enhances its accessibility to both the rail corridor and state highways. Staff finds the proposed use to be consistent with the UDC and Comprehensive Plan. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Development of the site shall comply with the dimensional standards of the I-L zoning district in UDC Table 11-3B-3. The applicant has received a letter from the northern property owner to allow for a reduced landscape buffer to the residential property. This reduction will be from 25 feet to 5 feet and requires City Council waiver to reduce the buffer as proposed. Staff is supportive of the reduction since the adjacent property will more than likely develop with an industrial use in the future. Additionally,the existing building will be non-conforming if annexed due to the 35-foot setback requirement off Linder Road. The building is roughly 37-feet off the curb line but is within the 35-feet when measured from the ultimate right of way. If approved,this would City of Meridian I Department Report create a non-conforming building and any new construction will be required to comply with the I-L dimensional standards. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): Vehicle Sales or rental and service—UDC 11-4-3-38: A. Vehicle repair may be allowed as an accessory use, subject to the standards for vehicle repair,major, and minor,in the district where the use is located. The applicant is proposing a future maintenance shop for vehicle repair purposes. While this is not going to be a use established on the site with the initial development, the applicant will come through permitting for establishing this accessory use in the future. B. Inoperable or dismantled motor vehicles shall be stored behind a closed vision fence, wall,or screen or within an enclosed structure and shall not be visible from any street. The applicant is proposing a future maintenance shop that will house any inoperable vehicles. In the interim, there will be no inoperable or dismantled cars on the site. C. Automotive sales and rental areas shall be subject to the minimum perimeter landscape requirement of parking areas in chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title. The minimum perimeter landscape requirements are being met and a reduction of the northern 25 foot landscape buffer is requested through a council waiver. D. In addition to chapter 3, article B, "landscaping requirements", of this title, one(1) square foot of landscaping for every fifty(50) square feet of vehicle display area shall be provided. The site has 540 square feet ofproposed vehicle display area which means 11 square feet of landscaping is required and the applicant exceeds this landscaping requirement. E. Vehicle display pads are prohibited in the required landscape buffers. The vehicle display is outside of the required 12.5 foot with water conserving design landscape buffer along Linder Road fulfilling this requirement. However, the applicant shall only be allowed to have 3 vehicles displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. UDC 11-3A-19 discusses the importance of building frontage along public roads and requires a minimum of 30%of the fagade to occupy the frontage. By limiting the display vehicles to 3, staff finds the fagade will maintain is prominent form along the frontage. F. Vehicle display areas shall incorporate design features including,but not limited to, landscape islands, curbing,and pedestrian walkways,that define main drive aisles and internal circulation patterns. The concept plan shows curbing around the vehicle display with landscaping on both sides to meet this requirement. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets The applicant is proposing waterwise landscaping which allows for a 50%reduction in street landscape buffers. A 12.5-foot wide street buffer is required to be constructed along N. City of Meridian I Department Report Linder Rd., an arterial street,measured from back of sidewalk, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Landscaping requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. ii. Parking lot landscaping Parking lot landscaping is required per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. A minimum 5-foot wide buffer should be provided along the east property boundary unless the requirement is reduced or waived by the Director for truck maneuvering areas as set forth in UDC 11-3B-8C.1a. Staff recommends the applicant shift the planter islands to the eastern buffer where the easement begins to maximize the parking on site. Landscaping requirements will be analyzed with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses A 25-foot wide buffer is required to the residential land use to the north as set forth in UDC Table 11-2C-3 and 11-4-3-34F, landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The Applicant requests City Council approval of a reduced buffer width from 25-to 5-feet adjacent to the residential use to the north as allowed by UDC 11-313-9C.2 with notice to surrounding property owners.A reduction to the buffer width shall not affect building setbacks; all structures shall be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the I-L district(i.e.25-feet).A letter was submitted from the abutting property owner to the north, Christopher and Angela Olson,agreeing to the proposed reduced buffer.While the landscape buffer will be reduced,the building will still be 25 feet from the north property line. Additionally,the eastern landscape buffer shall be landscaped in accordance with the irrigation districts' allowances. iv. Tree preservation A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the certificate of zoning compliance detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. v. Storm integration Storm drainage is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-18. Drainage swales should not be within the landscape setbacks along N. Linder Road. 2. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Nonresidential parking analysis UDC 11-3C-6 requires one space for every two thousand(2,000) sq. ft. of gross floor area in industrial districts. The applicant has provided 27 parking spaces which exceeds the UDC requirement. However,the applicant shall provide details for where customers will park on the lot. This shall be separate from the vehicles for sale on the property. ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space must be provided for every 25 vehicle spaces or portion thereof per UDC 11-3C-6G; bicycle parking facilities are required to comply with the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. Bicycle parking is not depicted in the plans and shall be included with the certificate of zoning compliance application. 3. Building Elevations (Comp Plan, Architectural Standards Manual): The applicant is proposing to keep the existing residence and convert it into the main office. Since the building is proposed to remain, it is not subject to the architectural standards. However, a tenant improvement permit will be required from the Meridian Building City of Meridian I Department Report Department to convert the residence into a commercial building.Additionally,the applicant is proposing a future maintenance building that will be required to comply with the architectural standards manual. 4. Fencing (UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): The applicant is not proposing fencing with this application. However, staff recommends a 6- foot tall privacy fence is installed and maintained on the north boundary to help buffer the neighboring residential. E. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): One(1)full driveway access exists to this site via Linder Rd.that is proposed to be eliminated, and the applicant will share access with the property to the south through a cross- access agreement. The intent of the UDC(11-3A-3) is to improve safety by combining and/or limiting access points to arterial streets to ensure motorists can safely enter all streets. Where local street access is not available,the property owner is required to grant cross-access/ingress-egress easements to adjoining non-residential properties. Although the use to the north is currently residential, it's anticipated to change to a non-residential use at some point in the future. The use to the south is commercial; as a provision of the development agreement, a cross- access/ingress-egress easement was required to be provided to the subject property at the time of future construction on the site and/or expansion of the existing parking lot,which has not occurred. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3, Staff recommends as a provision of the development agreement, driveway stubs are constructed to the north and south property lines and a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granted to the properties to the north(Parcel #R3579000012) and south(Parcel#R3579000020)in an effort to combine and limit access points to the arterial street(i.e.Linder Rd.). Copies of the recorded easements should be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. While a fire truck turnaround is provided on-site,the applicant shall widen the cross-access from the south to a 25-foot drive aisle. Additionally,the applicant shall work with our fire department to ensure the turning radius for the entrance is sufficient. This will be analyzed with the certificate of zoning compliance. 2. Sidewalk/Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): An attached 7-foot wide sidewalk was recently constructed along N. Linder Rd. along the frontage of this site. The Pathways Plan designates a 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway in this area. Because the sidewalk was recently constructed,the Park's Dept. does not recommend it's removed and a new pathway constructed in its place at this time. If a new pathway is constructed in the future,there should be adequate room within the existing right- of-way(11'+/-) for the pathway without dedication of a public use easement. F. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. City of Meridian I Department Report 2. Storm Drainage (UDC I1-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development. III. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A Development Agreement(DA)is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s) at the time of annexation ordinance adoption,and the developer. A final plat or certificate of zoning compliance shall not be submitted until the DA and Ordinance is approved by City Council. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council granting the annexation. The DA shall, at minimum,incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: A. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the concept plan, landscape plan, and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained herein. B. No more than three(3) cars shall be displayed along N. Linder Road at any one time. The vehicles shall not be displayed in front of the building. C. In accord with UDC 11-3A-3,the applicant shall construct driveway stubs to the north and south property lines and a cross-access/ingress-egress easement granted to the properties to the north(Parcel#R3579000012)and south(Parcel#R3579000020) in an effort to combine and limit access points to N. Linder Road. Copies of the recorded easements shall be submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the proposed use. D. The applicant shall install a 6-foot-tall privacy fence on the north property boundary to help buffer the neighboring residential. E. The existing structure is nonconforming with the 35-foot setback along N. Linder Road. Any future expansion will require compliance with the I-L zoning regulation per UDC 11-2C-3. City of Meridian I Department Report B. Meridian Public Works wastewater Distance to Sewer Available at Site Serwiws + Sewer Shed Estimated Project Seeappllcatlon Sewer ERU's • WERF Declining Balarrtp + Project Consistent Yes with WW Master Plan{Facili r Plan r I mpacts{canoerns + See Publ le Works Slte S cific Conditions water + Distance to Water Water AvailableatSite Senrims PressumZone Estimated Project see appl leatlon Water ERt!'s Ww+ ergauality None + Project Consistent Yes with Water Master Plan ImpactVConcemr, N one-Ensure rno trees are I ocated withl n 10'Gf the Water Meter NON-PLAT CONDITIONS PUBUC'WORY4 DEPARTMENT 5iie Specific Conditions of Approval I_ If a+rWel l it 10"Vd an tlu siu it must ht abpmdcmodl pvt regulmory requirements and PAPof of abandonment must be provided to the City, 2. Ensure no sewer services pass ll Bough infiltration benches, 3_ Provide HIP Easements For mains,hydrmt laterals a,td water sirvices. Easements shoLdd Oxlond up to the end of mftiWhydmntlwater meter and 1.0'heytmd it. 5. No pemtaiient.s"ctures(tree%,hushes,buildings,carport,trash receptacle walls, fences, infiltration trenches. light poles, ctc_)tobt:built within the utility eawrnLntt. CenOral Conditions of Approval l. Applicam shall coordinale water and swer main size mW routing with the Public Works Depaninaot. 2_ PtK Meridian City C'adc(NIC'C),the"Iir!ant shall br"pomsibie 1p in"I sewCr r]nd walcr mains to and through this&vclopment. Applicant may be eligible for a reimbursement agmcmcm For infrastnEctvrc enhancement per MCC s 5, City of Meridian I Department Report 3_ The applicant shall pmvide easemern(s)for all public water/sewer maims outside of public right of away(include all water services aitd hydrants)_ Sewerfwater easement varies depending on 94wor depth.Srwer U-20 ft doLrp require a 30 ft-L Swmcnt,20-25 ft a 40 ft rkWMCnt,and 25-30 Il 1145 d casement. Ensurc no permment structures(trees,busbcs,buildings,carpans,trash morptaole walls,fences,infiltration wenches,light poles,etc.)are built within[he utility casarnem. &Ibntit an executed easement(on the form available front Public Works),a legal description pr4p0rVd by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surueyw,which must include the area of the eascmwnl (marked EXHIBIT A)and an 8113'x I I"rnup with bearings and distances(marked F-Xl-110IT 3) for review.Both exhibits must he waled,signed and dated by a Professional Land Surveyor.DO NOT RECORD. 4_ The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3 111-6).The applicant should be required to use any existing surkm or well water for the primary source_ If a surface or well source is rat available,a single-p0iet eonne4tion to the culinary water syswm 5ha11 be rLxgUirrd_I F A sin�]e-point.oonnceliart is 111;l i serf the developer m ill be responsible for the paymcnt ofasscssrncnts foT the common areas prior to prior to Tecciving&velopment plan approval. S_ Any structures that are al lowed to retrain shall be subject to evaluation and possible reassignment of street addressing to be in oampliance w iih MCC- 6- All irrigation ditches,canals,laterals,or drains,exclusive rafnatural waterways,intersecting, er05$ing OF baying AdiACent And ermtiguouS to thr W&inning subdi%�dUd shall be bddmS2e3 per UDC I l-3A-6, In performing such veock,the appl i cant shall complywith IdahoCc&42-1207 and any otherapplisablc law or wguiation, 7_ Any wells Thal wiI l not continue to W used must be properly abandoned according to]d;dto W0 Consttwction Standards Rules administered by the Idaho Department of Water Resourect. 'N- Developrr's Engineer shrill pMvide S statement addressing whettuK there tare any existing walls in the drvelopunerit,and if so,how they will continur to br used,qr PFMidc rrOof4(if their abandonment. x_ Any existing septic systems within this project shall be removed from servicc per City Ordinano 5sction 9-1-4 and 9 4 8, Contact Central District Health for abandonment procedures and inspections(208)375-5211. 9_ Al l improvements relatod to public life,safety and huttlih shall be oornplctcd pritw to occupancy of the structures, 10, Applicant shall be required to pay Public Works development plan review,and construction inspection tees_as detertu ined duriug the plan review process,prior to the issuance of a pl mi approval letter. 1_ It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all development features comply with the AmonCAns with DissbililirS ACL and OW Fair]lousing Act. 12. Applicant shall bt`responsible for application and compliancc with any Section 404 Pcrmining that may be required by the Army Corps of Enginccrs. 13. Dcvcloper shall coord i uate mailbox locations with the Meridian Pas[Office_ 14_ Cornpacticm test results shall be submitted to the Meridian Building Department for all building pads receiving enginccred backfil I,whtKe footing wcruld sit atop fil l rbatefiNl_ 15_ Thu design rngincer shall be rcquirjud to certify that the street ofnwKne elevations ue mat a minimum of 3-fc0 above the hiShest establ i shed perk groundwater cle ation, IN s is w=urc that the bottom elevation of the crawl spaces of homes,is at least 1-foot above_ 16. The applicants design engineer shall be responsible for inspection of all irrigation and/or drainage facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction ofan irrigation diS4110 or AC'HD.The design enginrurShall provide ccrtifitulirm 1hA1 the fstilitieS bAVC been inmallcd itt aCeordbncc with the appverd design plans.This certifu:Atinn will be required before a CCrUfieAic of occupancy is issued for any structures within the pealed. City of Meridian I Department Report 17_ At the completion-of the prge-ci,the appl leant shall be risponsibke to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards. These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the imuancc of a OcniFiicatinn of nrcuppnry for any suuctures within the proj-ta 18, A street light plan will need w be included in the civil construction plans.Street light plan requirements are listed in scetion 6r5 of Ibc Improvement Standards for Street 1-19171in9,A copy ofthe standards can be found at hup. wwtw_mcridianwy.oigrpublic_works.aspr:1id=u7;. 19_ The City of k 1uridian requires that the owne r post io the Ci ty a perfonnance surety in tku:Amount of 1251Ya of thr total crmscn-wLion cost far all imomptctc vXwrer,water and reuse iTAhStructurc prior to final plo-u signntura.This surety wilt he verified by a 1iM item Cost ewtimaw pr*Vidvd by the owner to the City,The sutcty can be posted in the form of an i rrcvocabl a Icttcr of ctcdi t,cash deposit or bond.Appiimat must file au application for surety,which can be found on tilt: Conf iliunity Developtucnt Depantuettt website. Please contact Land Development ScrVica tfiar snore infotmation at 88'7-221 t_ 20_ Thu City of lVieridian rk�quims that thr owncK post t0 the City a warranty Surety in the wnnun r of 2Wo of the total consinw1icm cost for all completed scswcr,ti+'4 r and reuse infr Lstructurc for duration of two years.This surety swill be verif ed by a line itctta cost craim ate provided by the OWFker to the City_The surety can be posted in the fomt of an irrevocable letter of credit_cash deposit or bond.Applicant must file an application for surety,which can be found an the Community Development Department website. Please contact Land Development Service for mim information at 887-221 t. City of Meridian I Department Report C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) NdM PeauI M1Q,RrlYdOM WHD w , limer f C'Mdawm Carlm lcaalw rv&,W- O Moxll "Ca wi&on Imo; Se;x4; ber 27,'202 To: Hk±k41d5 kin ker,via 4jwna,I Staff Contact:uaraLeigh Trayer,Planner Pr.i5Jt-tt E4MrlptI0ft Lihdbr WPM Cbr RLntal d SaMS This ii,an anrwxetiwr and Feaone applira[ion for The development of a 1,194 square foot office space and 1.4n sci uare foot automobile mai ntenance soap on 627-acres_ TIP GeneFbt&ax TMS dewebprnent•S e3tlrngned W$enLIIWe 2-�rehli:M tr,Gs per day. 3 vahkle trip M hour uI tyre PM peak hour,batted on the IMitUto Of Tramponat+or% ENirw4rs Trip Generation Manua 1,TV editiwx L05 Planning Tivesholdir in r he ruture with planned Comments; The tables above lest the existlrlg condltronsof"surrounding roadways witr*vut the prQpQwd dgv*Ippmerrt as rhis applicat:pn i€fGr annex@TMn bfsd rezor*onry.with a future Oevelppriwnr a ppicatran,rhis sunvnalry wi,Il t)e updated torw%ct the dav9WpRtient and di impxt, conr*ctingij,ou to more Ache rlry Hg*"rim1C.T.M.E/dame Scrc -i7-wd nGoy,ID-Ea71a-Ph.URMY-GX10-FX3aFW.SC.�a[rd.amray IV. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-511-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: City of Meridian I Department Report 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the Applicant's proposal to annex 1.0-acre of land with I-L zoning for the development of a vehicle sales or rental service facility is consistent with the General Industrial FL UM designation for this property. (See section V above for more information) 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment to I-L and conceptual development plan generally complies with the purpose statement of the I-L district in that it will encourage industrial uses that are clean, quiet and free of hazardous or objectionable elements and that are operated entirely or almost entirely within enclosed structures and is accessible to an arterial street(i.e. Linder Rd.). 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare as the proposed industrial use should be conducted entirely within a structure. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds City services are available to be provided to this development. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the City. IV. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on December 5t'',2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. In favor:Nick Rinker and Matt Wilke b. In opposition:None C. Commenting d. Written testimony:None e. Staff presenting application:Nick Napoli f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. None 3. Ke, ids)of discussion by Commission: a. Cross access to the property to the north. Creating a non-conforming structure with the approval of this application. The amount of vehicles being_displayed along Linder Road. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. None 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s)for City Council: City of Meridian I Department Report a. The number of vehicles being displayed along Linder Road and cross-access to the northern property. Staff has talked with the applicant and ITD about vehicle display areas as ITD requires 5 spaces. Staff is proposinga hange to this DA provision forte consideration. Additionally,the applicant would like to defer cross-access until his property is redeveloped into a use separate from a vehicle sales or rental and service center. Staff is proposing alternative language to allow for the cross-access to be deferred until redevelopment of the subject property. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report ' 1 � • CHERRY _ _ FAI 10 .. .ir Y PINE. z `I ` s ■K _` Z` Miamirt f k W— �;s � ��l�lllll�lllllilh� � q ,ire` o ��sal.. � 1• ik �.q6:.� J - ,, ' :� !, �1 ���s ■■■■�l�=fir ■ I"I i!1■■■u11111■■I `IIII� - ■�lllllllllll.■ • ; � ■■■11111■■r■■ �� �■r■■llll■■ �■r' • ■ ■� �::■■�� `� •:r■■lrlll Win■ ■■rr■■rr■■�■■� w.Ig111■■111 ■11■■ 1 ■■■uv ■n w n � ■I \■! r1 III. � �;Cp �■■� -Will- Al uj NONE loll rllllll _ .ter■ � ■■I all nn' ■IIu11u1 ! 111 � 11��I fill FRANKL—IN -- � ■:■■�r+yip� ��►q►►► //�`I� �H�t�;■ l■iir� �hh��►►1� ` rl�j■■ • 0 LLI �w.r ■■■■■!!� • � Q>•w r1 �■ ■■■i■ii■ ii - - ■ r"r [[[[u11111■■[ `Iul ■�llllllllll[■■ J ■■r■lllrl�■ll■ A i■lull!■ 7■ w • ■�,[1111�.. i �� ■-■oil■■■iol 1� w I.■■■■■■■i■■f■[I :i1r1111■■111 ■IN�00 • y•-` i�ni■► 1■r` ll am ■11■ �i!■ l■■ 1■I 111■ 11� IVVYi_!a y�1 1�� ��� ■�C-■ l r±'r Ilr1 11..its in [l�,Ai.'PC7 wi■ n qr i�[I 11■��� . ��I O�► �� O 1� ���; � J!##! Illrrr■■�■111:1.:+I■ • ��•� mil!■; 1 111 - ■ n 11 llrr •■•■■, Vir1u111urm�►■ A I�III r1■l� �'��'I`r�lh�� r - • FRANKL'IN NMI - . - mil r<► �#;Gf�illl��[ J�I� ,�,: as .� � p ulllrr. � -'III "■�muw.� ■■era :�— .■ ■milt ■l�l�,�,� �p[�■[[1■ [[Il New ■■lrlllp ii■ ■■ LU —+�w.■ ■wool"! ■■■ w a �i ■■■■■■■■ iiOWED7■ - .. y �Il 11l[[u1111[■■ `III ' ■■lllllllll![■■ � � ■■r■lrlrr�■tit � ��■■lull■■ �■■I w ■■!7■� ��i ll! `� i�■■ililll ■�■ III ���Ai�1[1111 w� i 1�■ \ ■w■i■■■■tiol 1�+w °n�' � ■Imo■■■■i■■i■■�■II � :�Iruu■out■■111■� E lEii.► ,■■ ll C. 1 '�� ,■■ �iwli sell �►11i11; Ilr �: •r=�:`�IJ■ ::: ro� :■■ llilll�■■■Ill" rr;.iC I■■■�� l y■ - N ■r a■■ '!■■■11111 ■■IIu11 11,C i■♦ w�■ ���= 1 a 1■ � w � �■Ill 1 ws■ 11:! ■ i.N i it 11111 -' l Ilr jlluw\�� ■ A■ ■II■11111 Neill■ ■�Aal■ ■ N 1 11 arm � � ■ ■ 11 i WINE ■ l e� 1 � `_F_RANKLIN� �����■ � ■ gn 1 a■■nl�in—rrl �■ I �■■■�`�1� *fYrs �� ■ •tr�C 1111 ■uwlnnnu' ■■ wIy� ._ I� ■p mn■dl■�J I� B. Subject Site Photos 4 1- ,ems.:•• -; � .�`�:`�s,. _ .' of City of Meridian Department Report C. Service Accessibility Report Description Lceation Within 1/2 mile of City Limits YELLOW Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Within 100 yrfloodplain & < 2 acres RED Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of current transit route GREEN Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing # of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN Either a High Schaal or College within 2 miles OR. a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile drivin.-. GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report A Site Plan(date: 11/4/2024) CL 5pg E S IS C wr •a�a.s��a�wrw� w.ww 15 @ �"P .[ Alwn We�eYa F� 9 g. � F a i TARCHI tLC7URAL SITE PLAN City of Meridian I Department Report E. Annexation Legal Description& Exhibit Map ELSE iGEBRIISON LAND SURVEYS,PLLC 2261 Sumac Sf+Nar,Bwe,Jdeho&3706 TeiVharre(20)$* 6m rr&&@eo wys.mm t7 OCbb§r 2024 F=L$ft)ed Na 74097E r.wnd GowApuon EXHIBIT A Lat 3 of liappem A,cro Suhdivlsna J8.'ewdrd plat cn file in&]olr 20 of Rats aA Page 129a rKQnjs cf A k Gmmn ,Idehc) erd�i pQrWi to N SPA of$Ocdon i 21 T.3 N..R.11U,.9,M2,Mer,dlan Ada Caunly,Idaho:dmatcd as Ulam: Cwmercing a1 a dearrd drams cep mQinU"ML maf"the 44W oalnFI of AO 8*�i or Seatian 12,thence SOLN.-1 lg almg the weMk Ir9 od eaid Secfim$OD'31'3Er W a dstance of Wd 124W.Lb th9 POUF OF KUNMING' Thenaele Oi9saldline598"13U Ea4istainof4C.01faetieafoaridSterolpinmonurneM4thenplhwesl amner of 960 Lol 3 an the eaMPe l4yMs�ine or Narlh--k&r Road. ThmmIwA*q said nghm-cd.Wspw9cimiruing*(NMnpfLPrdfly fine af*aid Lat39W13 Eamstanneof 116.6;feat 63 a found sie$I Viu nmumemkq Me nrrit*W camAr or said La; TtYk"seulhedy aroig the eml lire of said lW S WSV N a ftuncs od 120A W 1k a fwnd eleel on rmnumanoN liresouRleaslearnerof9W Lol; Itwoe w+anMa along the SoUltrorl!inA or said Lot N W13'52'W it dWarce of 316.62 fleet t ths Mufhrreet Comr of ssid lot an the eas"Nhb-O-wq irx,of W Math Ljrjder Read; Thence 6euing said fins fi W 13'52 h'g dstaam of 44.t17 feei to a pain-:�m Il:e wmsbBdy Lhe of sad Section 1 T. Therwe nAhedy moms said wmtedp IIN of 5adw 12 N C4'31W E a dislarrae of 120M kw to ttio RUN-OF LSE NNINS. Theabovm-descrihednOQfrW4COR3hE42,030 square feeLmmorb %ajNEdmeIIOISWi eawments and righly.of. ,wary. e' J8 9 g! Ka FI$lPrelgpg'�UIf�4[�66ti W4'+r'Le]�le'�U.'5]A Dex fo-mrrc+epgn 99t .d€rt City of Meridian Department Report — IV LINDER ROAD ------ — _ 74#2 75 { I �4 fd 003i'39" E P20.CQ' t j r I � Q ca �to y w 2 Z I y_ rn 00 Qr "1s roil Sp IQ LW 0 Puzi City of Meridian Department Report