HomeMy WebLinkAboutLanark Property RZ
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Hearing Date: 11/2812006
Mayor & City Council
Amanda Hess, Associate City Planner
884-5533
~erld{~~\ lVED
'-,["T~'~' ; 2 1 2006
SUBJECT:
Lanark Rezone
City Of Meridian
· RZ-06-010 City Clerk Office
Rezone of 2.20 Acres from I-L (Light Industrial) to C-G (General Retail and
Service Commercial)
I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The Applicant, Ron Van Auker, has applied for a Rezone (RZ) of 2.20 acres from I.L (Light Industrial) to
C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial). The Applicant intends to construct office and retail uses
on this site that are not allowed within the Light Industrial zone. The subject property is located at the
northwest comer of East Lanark Street and Eagle Road in Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 1 East,
B.M., and is currently referenced as Assessor's Parcel Numbers R6510580012 and R6510580020. This
property is within the Urban Service Planning Area and the corporate boundaries of the City of Meridian.
This site, Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, of the Olson & Bush Industrial Park, Phase 1, is currently vacant. The
other lots within the Olson & Bush Industrial Park, Phase 1, have been fully developedlbuilt-out. Lot 1,
Block 1, of the subject site, has direct frontage on Eagle Road and E. Lanark Street. Lot 2 also fronts E.
Lanark Street.
The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan and elevations for this site. The applicant is proposing
to make site improvements (landscaping, pathways, etc.) at the time of submittal for a Certificate of
Zoning Compliance (CZC). At that time, Planning Staff will require site improvements in accordance
with the Unified Development Code, including but not limited to, parking and landscaping. As the subject
property also lies within an entryway corridor, the applicant will also be required to submit for Dcsign
Review of the proposed structure.
The proposed zoning amendment (RZ) is not consistent with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Futurc Land
Use Map, which deems the appropriate land uses for this site, "Industria1." Despite the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map designation of "Industrial" for this area, the applicant's request to rezone the property
to C-G is generally compatible with the surrounding land uses, as there is extensive commercial
development along Eagle Road including, but not limited to, the big box retail furniture store located
directly east of the site.
2. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
While the Comprehensive Plan Zoning Map's designation for the subject property is Industrial, staff
believes that the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the existing conditions in this area support the
proposed zoning amendment. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of RZ-06-010, as pn:st:ntt:u ill the
staffreport for the hearing date of November 2,2006, based on the Findings of Fact as listed in Exhibit D
and subject to the Conditions of Approval outlined in Exhibit B. The Meridian Plannine: and Zonine:
Commission heard this item on November 2. 2006. At the public head"!!. they moved to
recommend approval.
a. Summary of Commission Public Hearing:
i. In Favor: Brad Miller
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 1 0
PAGE 1
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEP ARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
11. In Opposition: None
iii. Commentine: None
lV. Written Testimonv: Ron Van Auker (Applicant)
v. StaffPresentim!: Application: Amanda Hess
vi. Other Staff Commenting on Application: Caleb Hood. Mike Cole
b. Kev Issues of Discussion bv Commission:
i. The vacation of a public utilities / drainaee / irrigation easement which spans the
property line common to Lots 1 & 2;
ii. The Applicant's requests to postpone installation of sidewalk along Eagle Road
until such time that rrD widens Eagle Road - timing of Eagle Road widening in
this area:
iii. The Applicant's requests to eliminate the Design Review requirement to install
the 8-foot pedestrian walkway from the perimeter sidewalk to the building
entrance: and
lV. The Applicant's requests to install a 5-foot wide land use buffer (between I.L
zoned property and proposed C-G zoned property) on the western property
boundary. where staff has requested 10 feet.
c. Kev Commission Changes to Staff Recommendation:
i. Elimination of sidewalk alonlZ the western side ofthe proposed struchrre.
d. OutstandinlZ Issues for City Council:
1. Commission did not amend the proposed Development Agreement provisions
listed in Section 10 of the staff report to include the Staff-requested requirement
that the applicant vacate the utilities / drainage / irrigation easement. prior to
submittal ofthe Certificate of Zonine Compliance (CZC).
ii. Staff has received confirmation that ITD does not have imminent plans for
expansion / improvements of Eaele Road between Fairview Avenue and Franklin
Road (it is currently not a funded project). ITD's future concept plan for this
section does show a 10-foot wide pedestrian path along Eagle Road to be
constructcd cithcr within or outside of thc rililit-of-way (within the City's
landscape buffer). ITD's future plan is to install the path adjacent to older
projects where the City did not require said installation originally. However. ITD
is 100kinlZ for the City to provide pedestrian walkways with all new development
applications along the corridor. in anticipation of these walkways being
COIlllected when Eagle Road is improved someday.
3. PROPOSED MOTIONS
Approval
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number RZ-
06-010 as presented in tht: staff r"'Purt for the hearing date of November 28, 2006, with the
following modifications: (Add any proposed modifications.)
Denial
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to recommend deny File
Number RZ-06-010 as presented during the hearing on November 28, 2006, for the following
reasons: (State specific reasons for denial of the annexation and/or preliminary plat request.)
Continuance
After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to continue File Number RZ-
06-010 to the hearing date of (insert continued hearing date here) for the following reason(s):
(State specific reason(s) for a continuance.)
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 1 0
PAGE 2
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
4. APPLICATION AND PROPERTY FACTS
a. Site Address/Location:
3180 E. Lanark Street
Lots I & 2, Block I, Olson & Bush Industrial Park
Section 8, T3N, RIB
b. Owner / Applicant:
Ronald Van Auker
3084 E. Lanark Street
Meridian, ill 83642
c. Architect: Cornel Larson, Larson Architects
d. Present Zoning: I-L
e. Present Comprehensive Plan Designation: Industrial
f. Applicant's Statement/Justification:
The applicant is requesting rezoning so the proposed on-site development of retail and office
uses can be supported by the appropriate zoning designation of "Commercia1." The zoning
amendment will be harmonious with the adjacent commercial development along Eagle Road
which has already, or is anticipated to develop.
The two-story building will feature a single retail use on the ground floor with multiple office
spaces to be located on the second floor.
The project will provide landscaping in accordance with the UDC. The fayade of the structure
will be composed of stucco and stone in earth tones. The building will also feature tension
I,;anopies at the retail windows.
5. PROCESS FACTS
a. The subject application will, in fact, constitute a rezone as determined by City Ordinance. By
reason of the provisions of UDC 11 ~5A-2D, a public hearing is required before the City
Council on this matlt:r.
b. Newspaper notifications published on:
October 16 & October 30, 2006 (P & Z Commission);
November 6 & November 20,2006 (City Council)
c. Radius notices mailed to properties within 300 feet on:
Ol,;tobcr 6, 2006 (P & Z COllunission);
November 3,2006 (City Council)
d. Applicant posted notice on site by:
October 23,2006 (P & Z Commission);
November 18, 2006 (City Council)
6. LAND USE
a. Existing Land Use(s): Vacant
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 1 0
PAGE 3
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEP ARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
b. Description of Character of Surrounding Area: Commercial, Industrial Uses, & Office Uses
c. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
1. North: Union Pacific Railroad, zoned I-L
2. East: Willey Subdivision, zoned C-G
3. South: Olson & Bush Industrial Park, zoned I-L
4. West: Olson & Bush Industrial Park, zoned I-L
d. History of Previous Actions: Olson & Bush Industrial Park No. 1 was granted annexation /
zoning / plat approval back in the late 1980's. Staff does not have documentation pertaining to
this.
e. Existing Constraints and Opportunities
1. Public Works
Location of sewer: Sewer is available in Lanark.
Location of water: Water is available in Lanark.
Issucs or conccms: No conccms.
2. Vegetation: N/ A
3. Floodplain: N/A
4. Canals/Ditches Irrigation: A large ditch runs along the eastern and northern
boundaries of this site.
5. Hazards: N/A
6. Proposed Zoning: C-G
7. Size of Property: 2.20 acres
f. Summary of Proposed Streets and/or Access:
The subject property will be directly accessed via E. Lanark Street. No new accesses are
proposed with the application to Eagle Road. Direct lot access to Eagle Road should be
prohibited. Any new access point to Lanark Street must be approved by ACHD.
7. COMMENTS MEETING
On October 13, 2006, Planning Staff held an agency comments meeting. The agencies and departments
present include: Meridian Fire Department, Meridian Police Department, Meridian Parks Department,
Meridian Public Works Depmtment, and the Sanitary Services Company. No significant comments were
received from any agencies or departments. Staff has included all comments and recommended actions in
the attached Exhibit A. Because this is only a rezone application, there are no conditions of approval.
8. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES AND GOALS
The subject property is designated on the Comprt:ht:nsivt: Plan Futurt: Lanu Ust: Map as "Illuustrial." Tht:
Comprehensive Plan defines the Industrial district as: "Areas designated to allow a range of industrial
uses to support industrial and commercial activities and to develop with sufficient urban services. In light
industrial areas, uses may include warehouses, storage unites, light manufacturing, and incidental retail
and office uses. Heavy industrial areas may include processing, manufacturing, warehouses, storage units,
and industrial support activities. In all cases, standards for screening, landscaping, and adequate access
would be developed and implemented."
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 1 0
PAGE 4
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
Although this designation is not consistent with the proposed G-G (General Retail and Service
Commercial) zone, staff fmds that there is a strong argument for saying that thc policies set forth in the
comprehensive plan do support a commercial use on this site. A key component of this argument is the
relative flexibility of Meridian's Comprehensive Plan (quoted below) as described in Chapter I, Section B
of the Comprehensive Plan.
"The Meridian COlllPl'ehensive Plan is an official pulicy guiut: fur ut:dsiuIlS l,;unl,;t:rning the
physical development of the community. It indicates, in a general way, how the community
may develop in the next five to ten years."
Furthermore, in Chapter VII, Section C - "Future Conditions" states the following:
"Figure VII-2 [The Comprehensive Land Use Map] depicts desired future land use categories
and their location within the Impact Area. The areas depicted on the map are conceptual and,
therefore, will require further analysis prior to the creation of a zoning map."
While the proposed zone does not explicitly comply with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, staff,
upon further analysis, finds that it would be acceptable to extend the "Commercial" designation to this
property as the proposed zone does fit with the development patterns of the surrounding area.
Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this property and apply to the
proposed development (staff analysis below policy in italics):
. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 7 - Encourage "...high dcnsity dcvclopment along
major transportation corridors..."
The subject property has frontage on SH 55 / Eagle Road, a principal arterial roadway. This
proposed commercial and office development will complement a4facent commercial uses.
. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 5 - "Require appropriate landscape and buffers
along transportation corridors..."
At the time of submittal for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance, Staff will require the applicant to
provide landscaping per the UDe standards including, but not limited to, within the parking area,
the buffering adjacent to Eagle Road and Lanark Street.
. Chapter VII, Goal IV, Objective D, Action 4 - "Integrate pathway I bikeway plans to ensure
appropriate access along the right-of-way."
Per the UDe standards, Staff will require the applicant to provide a ten-foot wide detached
sidewalk along Eagle Road and attached sidewalk on Lanark Street at the time of submittal for a
Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
9. ZONING ORDINANCE
a. Allowed Uses in Commercial Districts: UDC Table 11-2B-2 lists the permitted, accessory, and
conditional uses in the C-G zoning district. Retail stores, offices uses, und service-bused industries
are either principally or conditionally permitted uses within the C-G zone.
b. Purpose Statcmcnt of Zone: Thc purposc of the Commercial Districts is to provide for the retail
and service needs of the community in accord with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan. Four
Districts are designated which differ in the size and scale of commercial structures accommodated
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 1 0
PAGE 5
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
in the district, the scale and mix of allowed commercial uses, and the location of the district in
proximity to streets and highways.
10. ANALYSIS
a. Analysis of Facts Leading to Staff Recommendation
REZONING ANALYSIS:
Based on the compliance of the proposed development with the Unified Development Code and the
general conformance with the policies and goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan, staff
believes that rezoning the subject property from I-L to CoG is justifiable. Please see Exhibit D for
detailed analysis of the required facts and fmdings for rezoning.
The legal description for rezoning submitted with the application (prepared on August 8, 2006, by
Todd R. Waite, PLS) shows the property within the existing corporate boundary of the City of
Meridian.
A Development Agreement (DA) will be required as part of rezoning of this property. Prior to
rezoning approval, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian, the property owner(s)
at the time of rezoning ordinance adoption, and the developer_ The applicant shall contact the
City Attorney, Bill Nary, at 888-4433 to initiate this process. The DA shall include, at minimum,
the following:
. All future uses shall not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions
of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason
of excessive production oftraffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
. All future development of the subject property shall comply with City of Meridian ordinances
in effect at thc timc of dcvclopmcnt, as wcll as any requirements of this site associated with
annexation and platting ofthe Olson & Bush Industrial Park.
. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with sewer and water service
installation.
. The following shall be the allowed uses on this property: Permitted and accessory uses within
the C-G zone. All conditionally permitted uses in said zone shall be subject to CUP approval.
. The applicant shall be responsible to obtain a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) permit
from the Planning Department is prior to and construction on the subject site. The applicant
shall also submit a Design Review application to the Planning Department concurrent with the
CZC application for the proposed structure.
. The applicant shall be allowed to construct only one driveway access to E. Lanark Street,
location to be approved by the Ada county Highway District (ACHD).
. The applicant shall construct, at minimum, a 10-foot landscapc buffcr in accordancc with UDC
policies to be located along the westernmost property boundary. The applicant shall also
construct, at minimum, a 35-foot wide landscape buffer along Eagle Road.
. The applicant shall complete all required improvements prior to obtaining a Certificate of
Occupancy for the proposed development.
. The applicant shall provide cross access to the property to the west, otherwise known as
Assessor's Parcel Number R6510580030, as proposed.
. The applicant shall install sidewalks around the structure, as propesed excludinl! the west side
of the buildin2. an 8-foot wide pedestrian pathway from the perimeter sidewalk to the
proposed building entrance, and a 10-foot wide walkway along Eagle Road.
1. Concept Plan: The applicant has submitted a concept plan for this site. Staff is generally
supportive of tlle concept plan submitted with the rezone application, with the following
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06.0 1 0
PAGE 6
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEP ARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
comments:
2. Access: There are two proposed access points to the subject site. Both are full access driveways
from E. Lanark Street located at the south property line. Staff is supportive of one access to E.
Lanark Street. Staff has concerns about possible traffic conflicts with two drive accesses in
such close proximity to Eagle Road. Staff also believes that the proposed cross access to the
adjacent lot eliminates the need for multiple driveways to Lanark.
3. Landscaping: The applicant has not provided a landscape plan for review at the rezoning stage.
However, Staff will require the applicant to provide landscaping per the UDC standards
including, but not limited to, within the parking area, and the buffering adjacent to Eagle Road
and Lanark Street.
Per UDC 11-3B-9B, all developing industrial lands must provide a landscape buffer along any
boundary adjacent to commercial and residential districts. The industrial property to the west
has been considered existing for years and, for that reason, Staff believes should not be rt:quirt:u
to bear the responsibility to install the buffer. Staff does believe that, although not required by
Ordinance, a minimum 10-foot wide landscape buffer is warranted between the subject
commercial property and the lot to the west, and said buffer should be installed by the
applicant.
4. Parking: The applicant's concept plan proposes 76 parking stalls. Only 25 parking stalls are
required by Ordinance. UDC Table 11-3C-l requires 90-degree parking stalls to be 19-feet
long, adjacent to 25-foot wide drive aisles. UDC 11-3C-5B-4 allows parking stall dimensions to
be reduced by 2 feet in length if 2 feet is added to the width of adjacent sidewalk or landscape
area. Compact stalls may he reduced in depth hy an additional two feet. tIDe 11-3A-17A
requires all sidewalks to be at least 5-feet wide.
5_ Design Review Standards: Eagle Road is designated as an entryway corridor. UDC 11-3A-
19B5 requires all structures on property adjacent to an entryway corridor to obtain
administrative design review approval. All future building(s) on this site will be subject to
design review. Staff is supportive of the conceptual elevation tor the front tayade, which is to
face Eagle Road. However, the north and south fayades of the proposed structure will also be
highly visible from Eagle Road, and Staff will require elevations for these at the time of
administrative design review.
A. Architectural Character:
i. Facades: Facades visible from a public street shall incorporate modulations in the
fayade, roof line recesses and proj ections along a minimum of twenty percent (20%)
ofthe length of the facade.
11. Primary public entrance(s): The primary building entrance(s) shall be clearly defmed
by the architectural design of the building. Windows, awnings, or arcades shall total a
minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the facade length facing a public street.
111. Roof lines: Roof design shall demonstrate two or more of the following: a)
overhanging eaves, b) sloped roofs; c) two or more roof planes; d) varying parapet
heights; and e) cornices.
iv. Pattern variations: At least two changes in one or a combination of the following
shall be incorporated into the building design: color, texture, and / or materials.
v. Mechanical equipment: All ground-level and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be
screened to the height of the unit as viewed from the property line.
B. Color and Materials: Exterior building walls shall demonstrate the appearance of high-
quality materials of stone, brick, wood or other native materials. Acceptable materials
include tinted or textured masonry block, textured architectural coated concrete panels,
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 I 0
PAGE 7
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
tinted or textured masonry block, or stucco or stucco-like synthetic materials. Smooth-
faced concrete block, tilt~up concrete panels, or prefabricated steel panels arc prohibitcd
except as accent materials.
C. Parking Lots: No more than seventy pcrccnt (70%) of thc off-strcct parking area for the
structure shall be located between the front fayade of the structure and abutting streets,
unless the principal building( s) and / or parking is / are screened from view by other
structures, landscaping and/or berms.
D. Pedestrian Walkways:
i. A continuous internal pedestrian walkway that is a minimum of eight feet (8') in
width shall be provided from the perimeter sidewalk to the main building entrance.
The walkway width shall be maintained clear of any uutuuur sale displays, vt:nuing
machines, or temporary structures.
ii. The internal pedestrian walkway shall be distinguished from the vehicular driving
surfaces through the use of pavers, colored or scored concrete, or bricks.
111. Walkways at least eight feet (8') in width, shall be provided for any aisle length that
is greater than one-hundred fifty (150) parking spaces or two hundred feet (200')
away from the main building entrance.
iv. The walkwaYil ilhall have weather protection (including but not limited to an awning
or arcade) within twenty of all customer entrances.
6. Certificate qf Zoning Compliance: The purpose of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC)
permit is to ensure that all construction, alterations and/or the establishment of a new use
complies with all of the provisions of the UDC before any work on the structure is started
and/or the use is established (UDC 11-5B-IA). To ensure that all ofthe conditions of approval
listed in Exhibit B are complied with, Staff will require the applicant to obtain CZC approval
from the Planning Department prior to building construction, where all site and landscaping
improvements must be installed prior to occupancy.
b. Staff Recommendation: While Staff is supportive of rezoning without securing a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment in this instance, Staff finds that such unconventional interpretation of the
Comprehensive Plan policies is only appropriate in very limited cases. For example, in the subject
case where only a minor extension of the zoning boundaries, or "bump," for a small, immediately
adjacent property. And where due consideration of the neighbors and the compatibility of
surrounding land uses should be taken into account.
Staff believes that the proposed zoning amendment will be harmonious with other adjacent
propcrtics along Eagle Road in this area which have already, or are anticipated to develop with uses
allowed in the C~G zone. And, based on the compliance of the proposed development with the
Unified Development Code and the general conformance with the policies and goals contained in
the Comprehensive Plan, Staff believes that rezoning the subject property from I-L to C-G is
warranted.
Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposal (RZ-06-01O) subject to the conditions listed
in Exhibit B. On November 2. 2006. the Meridian Plannine: and Zonin2 Commission voted to
recummend approval of the subiect application.
11. EXHIBITS
A. Drawings
I. Vicinity / Zoning Map
2. Conceptual Site Plan
3. Cunct:ptual Building Elevations
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 1 0
PAGE 8
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEP ARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
B. Agency Comments
1. Planning Department
2. Fire Department
3. Police Department
4. Parks Department
5. Idaho Power
6. Nampa / Meridian Irril!ation District
7. Central District Health Department
C. Legal Description
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Codc
Lanark Rezone - RZ-06-0 10
PAGE 9
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
A. Drawings
1. Vicinity / Zoning Map
Lanark Rezone Vicinity / Zoning Map
o 120 240
,..., -
-
480 ~
-'Feet ~
Exhibit A
PAGE 10
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
'" ,ii < >: i' , ' ,'". ..: '.i . . -+'
'~r~~:~'"_.--'''-~Ij.~~~~,~"r'',~'''~.~,~,7'~'~~~-_._''' ...._~-
. i'.'; , ' i .,... . , .' , i
,
I
i
.
I
,
I
.
!
I
,
II
Ii
I IIlI
I~ i
1= I
I, \
. I
j
,
I
\
I
2. Conceptual Site Plan
'> i
I
:r.'....,.....~- -
,~ r
, , ' l
· "It'; .
/, if,
, I,
"
f
I,
i
I
Exhibit A
~'"
.(
s
---
If
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
3. Conceptual Building Elevations
-191
I
Exhibit A
z
0
-
~
<C
>
W
.-1
W
I-
a..
W
t) Q
Z I
,.-
0 II
=
() (1.).
"
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
B. Agency Comments
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.1 Prior to rezone ordinance approval. the applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement that
incorporates the provisions as listed in Section 10 of the Staff Report. The rezoning legal
description submitted with the application (dated August 8, 2006, stamped by Todd R. Waite,
PLS) shows the property as contiguous to the existing corporate boundary of tht: City uf
Meridian.
1.2 The applicant should comply with all previous requirements uf this sitt: assuciated with
annexation and platting, as well any permits or regulations that may be in effect for the Olson &
Bush Industrial Park.
1.3 The applicant should obtain a Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) permit from the Planning
Department prior to construction of the building shell.
1.4 This site is subject to administrative design review approval, as the site is adjacent to Eagle Road,
an entryway corridor. Prior to any construction on this site, Design Review and CZC applications
should be submitted concurrently to the Planning Department for review and approval.
1.5 All required improvements must be complete prior to obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy for the
proposed development. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be obtained by providing
surety to the City in the form of a letter of credit or cash in the amount of 110% of the cost of the
required improvements (including paving, striping, landscaping, and irrigation). A bid must
accompany any request for temporary occupancy.
1.6 All sidewalks/walkways should be installed on the subject site pursuant to uue 11-3A-17.
1.7 The applicant should comply with the outdoor lighting standards shown in UDe 11-3A-ll.
1.8 All business signs require a separate sign permit in compliance with the sign ordinance.
1.9 Staffs failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or tenns of the Olson & Bush Industrial Park
Subdivision does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for compliance.
2. FIRE DEPARTMENT
2.1 Acceptance of the water supply for fire protection will be by the Meridian Fire Department and
water quality by the Meridian Water Department for bacteria testing_
2.2 Final Approval of the fire hydrant locations shall be by the Meridian Fire Department.
a. Fire Hydrants shall have the 4 W' outlet face the main street or parking lot aisle.
b. The Fire hydrant shall not face a street which does not have addresses on it.
c. Fire hydrant markers shall be provided per Public Works specifications.
d. Fire Hydrants shall be placed on corners when spacing permits.
e. Fire hydrants shall not have any vertical obstructions to outlets within 10'.
f. Fire hydrants shall be place 18" above finish grade.
g. Fire hydrants shall be provided to meet the requirements of the IFC Section 509.5.
h. Show all proposed or existing hydrants for all new construction or additions to existing
buildings within 1,000 feet ofthe proj ect.
2.3 Commercial and office occupancies will require a fire flow consistent with the International Fire
Code to service the proposed project. Fire hydrants shall be placed per appendix D.
2.4 Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the
jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as
measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. For buildings equipped
throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section
903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183).
a. For Group R~3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m);
b. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183
m).
2.5 Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144mm) or three stories in height shall have at least three
means of fIre apparatus access for each structure. Two of the access roads shall be placed a distance
apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the overall diagonal dimension of the property or
area to be served, measured in a straight line.
3. POLICE DEPARTMENT
3.1 The Police Department has no concerns related to the site design submitted with the application.
4. PARKS DEPARTMENT
4.1 The Parks Department has no concerns with the site design as submitted with the application.
5. InAHO POWER
5.1 Idaho Power has sufficient power capacity and will provide electric service to the development,
provided the applicant abides by the Rules, Rates, and Regulations as approved by the Idaho
Public Utilities Commission, and proper right~of-way can be obtained.
5.2 There is an existing 230kVline on site, so Idaho Power requests a 35-foot setback from the center
of the line be a no-building zone.
5.3 The applicant should contact the local Idaho Power Company Operations Center with a formal
request for service.
6_ NAMPA / MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT
6.1 Nampa / Meridian Irrigation District has no comment.
7. CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT
7.1 The Central District Health Department has no obi ections to the proposal.
Exhibit B
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
C. Legal Description
claiborn .- ~_e c~u'tin~
engineers II 8Ul"Yeyore
120 N. Curti8:Ro1d
.~ Idaho 83706
(208) 3764555
. Pax(2OB) 429.9862
P.N; 2331
ALigust 8.2006
IANARK STIlDT PROPERTY
REZONE DJ:$CRIPTION
Lota 1 -2. Block I, of 0110lUal Buih IaduMrial Park,aad. portion of tile public
roadI adjltllllt to said Lots lyiDa in the ~ 114 oftbl sC)..,tw>.ait 1I4of.SCctioo 8,
T .3N.. IlIB., 8.M., Ada County, Idaho. and boiaa more parda.Urly deSaibod II' .
tbUowI: . -
BetP-. It the SoutbwesI ClOl1HlI' of Aid Lot 2,
'theace N 00055'00" B .aIooatbe west oo.lRdeTy of_ Lot 2 fbr a disbmc;e of274.96 feet
to the NonhweIl comer of Aid {.(It 2;
tbeace S 19'02'OlT B aIoDg the North bouDderyofslid Olsoa 8Dd Bush~ Put
fbr a dJ~ of'320.00 ft!et to the But bOundary of Mid Sectioo a;
tIMmce S OOOSS"OO" W akms.18id BUt bouDdery for a diatance of299.99 fi.a to the .. '
oeatertine of'Laurk Street;
-< ~:~ ~.
Ibeace leaving said But bouiIdary N WOl ~31f' Waloaa the ClIDlarliDe ofLmirk~
fbt . cIittanCle 01'320.00 teet; -
thence -vina IIIid ~ N 00055'00" B fur a distance of25.00 feet to the POINT -",'
OP BBGINNING; - -' ..
\;VI''':'''''''. 2.20 &aIlS ofJaud. IIICIR or leu.
stJIIDCT to right ofways tbr Baade road BOd LaDut StNet.
P1~by: ToddR. WaitoP,L.S.
o 6
IID.tiaD PlIIbltI
WodmDIJL
C:\DOL .~ lid ..........1llIiIe\IIIIJ~V..I_Ll.t---- ~l
Exhibit C
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28,2006
Exhibit C
,
!',""l!,
~'" +
'1ft-.........
.. I'; ",'
.J"
0\ '. "
... J
r
.
,
I
I
j
'I:
\ ( "
"\ ..~ \~ '
c't:
:I.J
.,
"
!$I
,
.
1.-
~;I <1i 2
.....1 frl ~
81~g
-.l ....ot
~.~~
~~gi
:,,!~p.!i'
t!.'~~Q:
aS8 .
~~~~
~ ~
I Ii!
! .~..!l
~ ~,'I
~
~t. M ..l:in.M.Mi. ~. ~ ,
,~'...'~., ~.=~......(~-- ' ..'
'.' ... 31OlfJV:.t ' . . : .. :;
tI
e
I
~
~tl
I~
~;
,z
.it'
~
~.
t1)
e
i
J
,L... ,..,JllttU
. '-..... ~ ~......~. ~ ~ .......-,~. tIIIIt-........._~
. '''.WI 3 .GO.aGo iI' .. ,
"1\\
<,';' ," \,"';
.lllrR
CITY OF MERIDIAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR THE HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 28, 2006
D. Required Findings from Unified Development Code
1. Rezone Findings:
Upon recommendation from the Commission, the Council shall make a full investigation and
shall, at the public hearing, review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or
rezone, the Council shall make the following findings:
a. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan;
The applicant is proposing to zone the subject property to C-G. The Commission :finds that the
proposed zoning map amendment is generally compatible with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan. Please see Comprehensive Plan Policies and Goals, Section 8, of the Staff
Report.
b. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district,
specifically the purpose statement;
The Commission finds that retail stores and office uses are permitted within the requested zoning
district of C.G. The Commission believes that the existing parcels in the area have already
developed in a nature that is harmonious and appropriate to the proposed zone. Further, the
Commission also finds that the proposed zoning and future uses on this site can be designed and
constructed in a manner that will be harmonious with, and appropriate in appearance with, the
existing and intended character of the surrounding area.
The Commission does not find that the proposed zoning/uses will adversely change the essential
character of area. The Commission finds that the site is large enough to contain the required parking
and landscaping.
Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on staff s analysis, public testimony
received and any comments submitted from any other agencies or departments regarding whether
this property should be rezoned as proposed.
c. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and
welfare;
The Commission finds that the proposed zoning amendment will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare. The Commission does not anticipate the proposed rezone and subsequent
uscs will crcatc excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors.
Staff recommends that the Commission and Council rely on any oral or written testimony that may
be provided when determining this finding.
d. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by
any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited
to, school districts; and,
The Commission fmds that the proposed zoning amendment will not result in any adverse impact
upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing services to this site.
Exhibit D