Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutACHD Comments [1/11p ......;;~it,,, A~ tk~ut-;(;, SM-:e.e- John S. Franden, President Sherry R. Huber, 1st Vice President David Bivens, 2nd Vice President Carol A. McKee, Commissioner Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner November 2, 2006 RECEIVED NOV 0 3 2006 TO: Fairview Lakes LLC 1124 Santa Maria Boise, .l0_837t2 City of Meridian City Clerk Office SUBJECT: MCUP-06-032 Fairview Lakes Shopping Center 920-1020 E. Fairview Ave. On 7-10-2002, the Ada County Highway District Commissioners acted on MAZ-02-011/MCUP-02-014 /MPP-02-034 for Fairview Lakes Apartment Complex /Devon Park Subdivision. The conditions and requirements also apply to MCUP-06-032. · Prior to final approval you will need to submit plans to the ACHD Development Review Department. · A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. It you have any questions or concerns please teel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6177. Sincerely, /It. .l~'~AL~___ _.0-r1.fHlll-~ _ Chelsee Kucera Planning Intern Right-ot-Way and Development Services CC: Project File Lead Agency: City of Meridian Ada County Highway District. 3775 Adams Street. Garden City, ID · 83714 . PH 208-387-6100 . FX 345-7650. www.achd.ada.id.us .....;!~i... . ~ Ada County Highway District Right-oi-Way & Development Department Planning Review Division This application requires Commission action because of the number of vehicle trips per day that the site generates, and is scheduled to be on the consent agenda on July 10, 2002 at 6:30 pm. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on June 28, 2002. This item was revised on March 26, 2003 after the Meridian City Council approved the item on March 25, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for request for reconsideration guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 387-6177, atuning@achd.ada.id.us File Number(s): Fairview Lakes Apartment Complex / MAZ-02-011/ MCUP-02-014 Devon Park Subdivision/MPP-02-034 DevonParkSl!bdivisiQO #2/MPP03-006 Site address: 824 East Fairview Avenue Owner: Fairview Lakes, LLC 111 Auto Drive, Suite 102 Boise, Idaho 83709 Applicant: Hopkins Financial Services, Inc. 111 Auto Drive, Suite 105 Boise, Idaho 83709 Representative: Tamura & Associates 499 Main Street Boise, Idaho 83706 Application Information The applicant is requesting annexation, rezone, conditional use and planned unit development approval to construct a multi-family apartment complex and 35-commerciallretail/office lots. The site is located on the north side ot Fairview Avenue at approximately the mid mile marker between Locust Grove Road and Meridian Road. Acreage: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: - -,-~- 9.1 acres RUT R-40 Vicinity Map 1 ~'" A. Findings of Fact 1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 10,960 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing) based on the submitted traffic study. 2. Impact Fees: The impact fee rate from the fee tables for: o Apartment is $781.00 per unit. o General Office is $2,169.00 per thousand square feet of gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time. o Specialty Retail is $1,885.00 per thousand square feet ot gross building area, based on the impact tee ordinance in effect at this time. o Bank with drive-thru is $9,990.00 per thousand square feet ot gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time. .. o Fast Food with drive-thru is $4,715 per thousand square feet of gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time. 3. Impacted Roadways: Fairview Avenue Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Nearest intersection: Teare Avenue Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Speed limit: Clarene Street Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: . .--- Speed Iimit- ----- Jericho Road Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Nearest intersection: 1,080-teet Principal arterial West of Locust Grove was 29,931 on 7-6-00. "e" 35 Fairview Avenue and Jericho Drive intersection 60 Local residential Not available 20 60 Local residential Not available 20 o Collector North of Fairview was 3,850 on 8-7-01 Better than "e" 30 Jericho Drive and Fairview Avenue intersection 4. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was required with this application. The submitted traffic impact study was compiled by Dobie Engineering and the following is a summary of the findings: This Development is projected to be built-out by the year 2005. The following is a summary or the findings and recommendations provided by the Traffic Engineer: 2 The proposed Fairview Lakes Subdivision project is a proposed mixed use development including apartments, professional offices, specialty retail, and restaurants. The project will be developed in phases and is expected to reach full build out by the year 2005. Fairview Avenue is a standard principal arterial with a 64 ft. wide five-lane urban section. The posted speed limit is 35 mph east of Locust Grove Road. The Level of service for Fairview Avenue is estimated to operate at a LOS B/C during the peak hour period in the year 2005 without the addition of the site traffic. This development is projected to generate 10,960 total trips, ot which 1,230 will be captured within the development. Ot the remaining 9,730 trips 5,545 were estimated to be new to the area while 4,185 trips were estimated to be pass-by trips already on Fairview Avenue. These trips were based on 192 apartment units, 15,000 sf of office space, 100,000 st of retail use,- a 5j600-sf-bank; and 8,000 sf for restaurant. A trip capture rate ot 11.2% was used. The totals from the revised application were 192 apartment units, 15,000 sf of office space, 92,800 sf of retail use, a 5,000 sf drive-in bank, a 4,000 sf fast food restaurant w/drive-thru, and a 12,000 sf high turnover restaurant. The totals presented in the traffic study are actually higher than those calculated for the application total. This is the conservative approach which will safeguard against totals that may be higher than those projected. The need for a signal at this intersection should not be affected by the difference in traffic projections. Intersection Type ot Control 2002 PM - Existing 2005 PM- Existing LOS LOS Fairview/Ea Ie Si nalized D E Locust Signalized D D Grove/Fairview 1 S StreetlFairview Si nalized D D Cherry Signalized D D Lane/Meridian East Unsignalized N/A F* access/F airview West Signalized ~ N/A C ** access/Fairview ro osed * '" -Site traffic will experience significant delay during the PM peak hour. ** - This analysis was based on the assumption that the west access will be approved tor Signalization. Approach traffic from the site will maintain acceptable service levels by that time period with the addition of a traffic signal. Fairview Avenue was evaluated tor Level of service in the build out (2005) and 2020. The projections for the peak hour were LOS C for 2005 and LOS E tor 2020 based on a five-lane roadway. The recommendation is that Fairview Avenue be expanded to handle the additional capacity needed after year 2020. The Traffic study reviewed the Signal Warrants from the 1988 MUTCD. The analysis indicates that warrant #1 will be met with 75% of site traffic using the signalized intersection. Warrant #2 is met with less than 50% of the site traffic. Similarly, warrants #9, #10, and #11 are all satisfied based on projected traffic volumes. 3 property. 11. Five Year Work Program There are no improvements in the area that are scheduled in the Five Year Work Program. 12. Signal Location The District has chosen the location ot the signal at the commerciallindustrial roadway and Fairview Avenue intersection due to the tact that: · This location is at the half-mile · This location will serve more vehicle trips per day · This location will pull vehicle trips per day oft of Jericho Street (a collector roadway with front on housing) and will place the vehicles on a commerciallindustrial roadway · This location will provide the surrounding residential homes with access to a signal 4 . This location can serve more vehicle trips per day on the North side of Fairview Avenue than on the south side of Fairview Avenue B. Findings for Consideration 1. Right-of-Way and Sidewalk District policy requires 120-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of- way allows for the construction of a 7 -lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. Fairview Avenue is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five-Year Work Program or in the currently adopted 20-year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the applicant cannot receive reimbursement for dedicated right-of-way from av~jl_~bl~ coUeqted impact fees. The - applicant shall do one of the fOllciwing:- a. Dedicate by donation an additional5-feet of right-of-way along Fairview Avenue, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum ot 53-feet trom the centerline of the right-ot-way. b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5.foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum of 53-feet from the centerline of the right-ot-way, in an easement provided to the District. c. Do not dedicate additional right-ot-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. Roadway Offsets District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 300-feet from an arterial roadway (measured centerline to centerline). The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial/industrial roadway that intersects with Fairview Avenue 310-feet east ot the west property line. This roadway location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 3. Street Sectionti Distrid policy 7202.8 and 72-F1 B, requires roadways abutting commercial developments to be constructed as a 40-foot street section with curb, gutter and 5400t concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of right-of-way. The applicant is proposing to construct a commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This roadway is proposed to cul-de-sac just before the proposed multi-tamily residential apartment complex. This roadway will also provide a link that will connect into Teare Avenue. The proposed commercial/industrial roadway that the applicant is proposing will consist ot a 40-foot street section that includes 2-travellanes, a center turn lane, curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 54-teet of right-of-way. The proposed street section meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 5 4. Driveways District policy F2-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit ot 35 to align or offset a minimum of 150-feet from any existing or proposed driveway. District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), requires driveways located on commerciallindustrial roadways to offset a controlled and/or uncontrolled intersection a minimum of 50-feet (measured near edge to near edge). District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles to a maximum width of 35-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities it located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-toot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. Fairview Avenue Drivewav The applicant is proposing to construct one 30-foot wide driveway on Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to intersect Fairview Avenue approximately 205-teet west of the east property line. This driveway meets District policy and should be approved with this application. Commercial/Industrial Street Drivewavs The applicant is proposing to construct thirteen driveways on the proposed commercial/industrial roadway. The driveways are proposed to be constructed in the tollowing locations. · Driveway number 1 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 54-teet north of Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to be 25- feet in width. · Driveway number 2 and 3 are proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 175-feet north of Fairview Avenue. These driveways are proposed to align with one another. These driveways are proposed to be 17 -teet in width. · Driveway number 4 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 235-feet north of Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to be 21-feet in width. · Driveway number 5 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends north from Fairview Avenue approximately 58D-feet north of Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to be 22-feet in width. · Driveway number 6 is proposed to extend directly north of the commerciallindustrial roadway and proposed to intersect the northern portion of the cul-de-sac. This driveway is proposed to be 45-feet in width. · Driveway number 7 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 50-teet east ot the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This driveway is proposed to be 27 -feet in width. · Driveway number 8 is proposed to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 255-feet east of the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This driveway is proposed to be 20-teet in width · Driveway number 9 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 430-feet east of the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This driveway are proposed to be 25-teet in width. 6 · Driveways number 10 and number 11 are proposed to be 30-feet in width and located on the east and west side of the commerciallindustrial roadway just north of the proposed roundabout. · Driveway number 12 and 13 are proposed to be 30-feet in width and located on the east and west side of the commercial/industrial roadway approximately 160-feet north of the proposed roundabout. All of the proposed driveway locations meet District policy in regard to location. All of the proposed driveway widths meet District policy EXCEPT for driveway number 6. Driveway number 6 should be constructed a maximum ot 35-feet in width. 5. All Driveways __ ._ . Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its full width and at least 30-teet into the site b~yond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 6. Stub Streets District policy 7203.5.1 and 7205.5 requires stub streets to provide intra-neighborhood circulation and to provide access to adjoining parcels. District policy 7203.3.2 requires an existing street or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which extends at a boundary of a proposed development to be extended into that development. The applicant is proposing to extend Teare Avenue. This extension will provide a connection from Teare Avenue to Fairview Avenue. The extension of Teare Avenue meets the goals and intent ot District policy and has the supportive ot District staff. The District held a neighborhood meeting on Thursday March 20,2003. The Teare Avenue extension was approved by the Meridian City Council on March 25, 2003 after a number ot neighborhood concerns arose. Modification of Policv The applicant is proposing to terminate Clarene Street at its current location and construct temporary bollardsfor emergency access only. District policy requires that stub streets- be constructed and/or extended to adjoining properties to provide reasonable access and intra-neighborhood connectivity. Staff would generally support the extension of Clarene Street into the site, but due to the fact that the applicant is extending Teare Avenue to the residential neighborhood that is located to the northeast, staff is supportive of the applicant's proposal to construct bollards at the terminus of Clarene Street. With the construction of bollards, Clarene Street will be one-lot and less than 150-feet in depth, therefore, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround. 6. Turnarounds District policy 7204.9.2 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius ot 55-feet. The applicant is proposing to dedicate a hammerhead turnaround at the west end of Clarene Street on the applicant's property. This hammerhead turnaround will function as the property's frontage until the preliminary plat is submitted and the roadways are formally dedicated. This hammerhead turnaround is required to have bollards installed at the terminus of Clarene Street where the 7 hammerhead begins. The applicant should also enter into a license agreement for the maintenance of the hammerhead turnaround on Clarene Street due to the tact that the District will be unable to access the turnaround. The applicant is proposing to provide a permanent "hammerhead" easement to the District at the terminus of North Lark Avenue. This easement is acceptable to the District but must be approved by the Meridian Fire Department. The applicant should provide a permanent "hammerhead" easement to the District at the terminus ot the commerciallindustrial roadway and provide documentation to the District showing the review and approval of this configuration trom the Meridian Fire Department. 7. Roundabout The applicant is proposing to construct a roundabout within the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 530-feet north of Fairview Avenue. The roundabout should be designed with 21-foot street sections on either side of the center island. The applicant will be required to dedicate sufficient right-ot-way on either side of an island. Coordinate the size and design of the roundabout with traffic services staff. 8. Signalization The applicant is proposing to construct a new signal at the intersection ot Fairview Avenue and the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends north into the site. The signal is proposed at the halt mile. The traffic study determined that the warrants would be met and that the existing signals in the area would not be significantly impacted by the new signal. The District will contribute the hardware necessary tor the construction of the new signal and any related roadway improvements. The applicant should plan, construct and install the signal that is proposed at the intersection of Fairview. Avenue and the commercial/industrial roadway that extends north into the site. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall do one of the following: Dedicate by donation an additional 5-teet ot right-of-way along Fairview Avenue, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum of 53-teet trom the centerline of the right-ot-way. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete.sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum ot 53-feet from the centerline ot the right-ot-way, in an easement provided to the District. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-ot-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. Construct and install the signal and any related roadway improvements that are necessary for the proposed signal at the intersection ot Fairview Avenue and the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends north into the site. 3. Construct a commerciallindustrial roadway that intersects with Fairview Avenue 310-feet east otthe west property line, as proposed. 8 4. Construct the internal roadways as 40-foot street sections with curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. The portion of the commercial/industrial roadway that connects to Teare Avenue shall taper appropriately to accommodate for drainage. 5. Construct a 30~foot wide driveway to intersect Fairview Avenue approximately 205-feet west of the east property line, as proposed. 6. Construct a 25-foot wide driveway to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway approximately 54- feet north ot Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 7. Construct two 17 -toot wide driveway to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 175-feet north of Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 8; Construct a 21~footwide driveway to intersect the co-rnmerciallindustrial roadway approximately 235- feet north of Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 9. Construct a 22-foot wide driveway to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway that extends north tram Fairview Avenue approximately 580-feet north of Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 10. Construct a driveway with a maximum width of 35-teet to extend directly north ot the commercial/industrial roadway and proposed to intersect the northern portion of the cul-de-sac. 11 . Construct a 27 -foot wide driveway to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 50-teet east of the commercial/industrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north, as proposed. 12. Construct a 20-foot wide driveway to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 255-feet east of the commercial/industrial roadway that extends tram Fairview Avenue to the north, as proposed. 13. Construct a 25-foot driveway to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 430-feet east of the commercial/industrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north, as proposed. 14. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the east side of the commerciallindustrial roadway just north of the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 15. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the west side of the commerciallindustrial roadway just north of the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 16. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the east side ot the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 160-feet north of the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 17. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the west side of the commercial/industrial roadway approximately 160-feet north ot the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 18. Pave the driveways their full width and at least 30-teet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-foot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 19. Extend Teare Avenue as a 40-foot street section with curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 54-teet of right-of-way, as proposed. 9 20. Terminate Clarene Street at its current location and construct bollards tor emergency access only, as proposed. 21. Enter into a license agreement tor the maintenance of the hammerhead turnaround on Clarene Street due to the tact that the District will be unable to access the turnaround. 22. Provide a permanent "hammerhead" easement to the District at the terminus of the commercial/industrial roadway and provide documentation to the District showing that this configuration has been reviewed and approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 23. Construct a roundabout within the commercial/industrial roadway approximately 530-feet north ot Fairview Avenue. Design the roundabC?l!twifu a minimum ot 21-f.ootstreet sections OR either side of the center island. Dedicate sufficient right~of-way on either side of an island. Coordinate the size and design of the roundabout with traffic services staff. 24. Comply with all Standard Conditions ot Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside ot the right-ot-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damage curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction ot the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) for details. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance ot building permit (or other required permits), which iricorporates any required design chang-es: - - - -- - - 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements ot the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #195, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 8. It is the responsibility ot the applicant to verify all existing utilities within the right-of-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGU NE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-ot-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387- 6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10 9. No change in the terms and conditions ot this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 10. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in torce at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District ot its intent to change the planned use of the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, it all of the Site Specific and Standard Conditions ot Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity map 2. Submitted site plan 11 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action 1. Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration ot an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. .. . -. - -.~ - - -- - ....If ah10tion fo-reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting tollowing the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda for that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and intormation not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or intormation establishing an error ot tact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date ot the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHQ staff may _present .such written - and. oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. t. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 12 '\ \ I "," , "\ ,'~ ':} '~ , " :~;/< -', " 13 [I Development Process Checklist ~] ~Submil a development application to a City or to the County t8]The City or the County ""iltlransmitlhe development application to ACHD C81The ACHD PlIDnlnl Review Division will receive the development application to review ~The PI8Dnlnl Review OIvl5108 will do Q!1! of the following: OSend a "No Review" letter to the applicant stating that there are no site spcdfic requirements at this time. ,......----- ._- -.--,..-.-",--.. 0Send a "Comply Wltb" letter to the applicant statlng that if the development is wHhin ~__ __~_ __. -_ - - -- - -- __--pJatted-subdWision-or-part-of-a-previous,developmtrft-apJilicatfcinand tflat the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. DWrite a Starr Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation s)'lltem and evaluating the proposal for its confonnance to District Policy. OWrite a Commlsslo. Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its confonnance to District Policy. OThe Planning Rev1ew Division will hold a Technleal Review meeting for all Starr aad Commbslo. Level reporta. t81For ALL development applications, including those receiving a "No Review" or "ComplJ Wit.... letter: . The applicant should submit two (2) sell of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by tlie Development Review DlvlsloD for plan review an4 assessment of impact fee.. (Note: if there are no site improvements required by ACHD, then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) . The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHD) Cor ANY work in the right-of-way, including, but not limited to, driveway approaches, street improvements and utility cuts. OPa)' Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. lmpad fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEJIBER: COIIStruction (Zone) o Driveway or Property Approacb(s) . Submit a "Driveway ~PJ!l'~ac;~Jlequest': ContLto-Ada County-Highway-DistrictiACHDlCdnstroaioii (for approval by . Oevilopment sernces .. Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. o Worldnll. tile ACHD RJpt-or-Wa, . Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contr.lctor submit a "Temporary Highway l'se Permit Application" to ACHD Construction - Permits along wirh: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative & Plat, done by a Certified Plan Deslgner, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. Construction (SubJivisioru) o Sediment & froslo. Submittal . At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control :-.larrarive & Plat. done by a Certified Plan Designer, must be lurned into ACHD Construdion - SubJhision to be re'iiewed and approved by the ACHD Drainage Oi..ision. o Idabo Pow" Comp'BY . Vic Steelman at Idaho Power must have his !peo approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. o F1oall\pproval (rom O.~e'op!!!e!!! Serv!::= . ACHD Construction - Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services prior to 5cheduling a Pre-Con. ......;;~it,,, A~ tk~ut-;(;, ~ John S. Franden, President Sherry R. Huber, 1st Vice President David Bivens, 2nd Vice President Carol A. McKee, Commissioner Rebecca W. Arnold, Commissioner October 17, 2006 RECEIVED TO: Fairview lakes LLC 1124 Santa Maria Boise, ID 83712 City of Meridian City Clerk Office SUBJECT: MCUP06-032 Retail Space 920-1020 E. Fairview On 7-10-2002, the Ada County Highway District Commissioners acted on MPP-02-034/MPP03-006 for Devon Park Subdivison. The conditions and requirements also apply to MCUP06-032. · Prior to final approval you will need to submit plans to the ACHD Development Review Department. · A traffic impact fee will be assessed by ACHD and will be due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Contact ACHD Planning & Development Services at 387-6170 for information regarding impact fees. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact this office at (208) 387-6177. Sincerely, thdJa~ Chelsee Kucera Planning Intern Right-of-Way and Development Services cc: Project File lead Agency: City ot Meridian Doug Tamura Ada County Highway District · 3775 Adams Street · Garden City, ID . 83714 . PH 208-387-6100 . FX 345-7650. www.achd.ada.id.us .-J~_.. .,.,.....~ .....? "', ~ Ada County Highway District Right-of- Way & Development Department Planning Review Division This application requires Commission action because of the number of vehicle trips per day that the site generates, and is scheduled to be on the consent agenda on July 10, 2002 at 6:30 pm. Tech Review for this item was held with the applicant on June 28, 2002. This item was revised on March 26, 2003 after the Meridian City Council approved the item on March 25, 2003. Please refer to the attachment for request for reconsideration guidelines. Staff contact: Andrea N. Tuning, 387-6177, atuning@achd.ada.id.us File Number(s): Fairview Lakes Apartment Complex / MAZ-02-011/ MCUP-02-014 Devon Park Subdivision/MPP-02-034 Devon Park Subdivision #2/MPP03-006 Site address: 824 East Fairview Avenue Owner: Fairview Lakes, LLC 111 Auto Drive, Suite 102 Boise, Idaho 83709 Applicant: Hopkins Financial Services, Inc. 111 Auto Drive, Suite 105 Boise, Idaho 83709 Representative: Tamura & Associates 499 Main Street Boise, Idaho 83706 Application Information The applicant is requesting annexation, rezone, conditional use and planned unit development approval to construct a multi-family apartment complex and 35-commerciallretailloffice lots. The site is located on the north side of Fairview Avenue at approximately the mid mile marker between Locust Grove Road and Meridian Road. Acreage: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: 9.1 acres RUT R-40 Vicinity Map 1 A. Findings of Fact 1. Trip Generation: This development is estimated to generate 10,960 additional vehicle trips per day (0 existing) based on the submitted traffic study. 2. Impact Fees: The impact fee rate from the fee tables for: o Apartment is $781.00 per unit. o General Office is $2,169.00 per thousand square feet ot gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time. o Specialty Retail is $1,885.00 per thousand square feet of gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time. o Bank with drive-thru is $9,990.00 per thousand square feet of gross building area, based on the impact fee ordinance in effect at this time. o Fast Food with drive-thru is $4,715 per thousand square teet of gross building area, based on the impact tee ordinance in effect at this time. 3. Impacted Roadways: Fairview Avenue Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Nearest intersection: Teare Avenue Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Speed limit: Clarene Street Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Speed limit: Jericho Road Frontage: Functional Street Classification: Traffic count: Level of Service: Speed limit: Nearest intersection: 1,080-feet Principal arterial West of Locust Grove was 29,931 on 7-6-00. I'C" 35 Fairview Avenue and Jericho Drive intersection 60 Local residential Not available 20 60 Local residential Not available 20 o Collector North of Fairview was 3,850 on 8-7-01 Better than "C" 30 Jericho Drive and Fairview Avenue intersection 4. Traffic Impact Study: A traffic impact study was required with this application. The submitted traffic impact study was compiled by Dobie Engineering and the following is a summary of the findings: This Development is projected to be built-out by the year 2005. The following is a summary or the findings and recommendations provided by the Traffic Engineer: 2 The proposed Fairview Lakes Subdivision project is a proposed mixed use development including apartments, professional offices, specialty retail, and restaurants. The project will be developed in phases and is expected to reach full build out by the year 2005. Fairview Avenue is a standard principal arterial with a 64 ft. wide five-lane urban section. The posted speed limit is 35 mph east of Locust Grove Road. The Level of service for Fairview Avenue is estimated to operate at a LOS B/C during the peak hour period in the year 2005 without the addition ot the site traffic. This development is projected to generate 10,960 total trips, of which 1,230 will be captured within the development. Of the remaining 9,730 trips 5,545 were estimated to be new to the area while 4,185 trips were estimated to be pass-by trips already on Fairview Avenue. These trips were based on 192 apartment units, 15,000 sf of office space, 100,000 st of retail use, a 5,600 sf bank, and 8,000 st for restaurant. A trip capture rate of 11.2% was used. The totals from the revised application were 192 apartment units, 15,000 sf of office space, 92,800 sf of retail use, a 5,000 sf drive-in bank, a 4,000 sf fast food restaurant w/drive-thru, and a 12,000 sf high turnover restaurant. The totals presented in the traffic study are actually higher than those calculated for the application total. This is the conservative approach which will safeguard against totals that may be higher than those projected. The need for a signal at this intersection should not be affected by the difference in traffic projections. Intersection Type of Control 2002 PM - Existing 2005 PM- Existing LOS LOS F airview/Eagle Signalized D E Locust Signalized D D Grove/Fairview 1st StreeUFairview Signalized D D Cherry Signalized D D Lane/Meridian East Unsignalized N/A F* access/Fairview West Signalized - N/A C ** access/F airview proposed * - Site traffic will experience significant delay during the PM peak hour. ** - This analysiS was based on the assumption that the west access will be approved for Signalization. Approach traffic trom the site will maintain acceptable service levels by that time period with the addition of a traffic signal. Fairview Avenue was evaluated for Level of service in the build out (2005) and 2020. The projections tor the peak hour were LOS C for 2005 and LOS E for 2020 based on a five-lane roadway. The recommendation is that Fairview Avenue be expanded to handle the additional capacity needed after year 2020. The Traffic study reviewed the Signal Warrants from the 1988 MUTCD. The analysis indicates that warrant #1 will be met with 75% ot site traffic using the signalized intersection. Warrant #2 is met with less than 50% of the site traffic. Similarly, warrants #9, #10, and #11 are all satisfied based on projected traffic volumes. 3 5. Site Information: The site is currently vacant. 6. Description of Adjacent Surrounding Area: . North: Meridian Place Subdivision Number 1 . South: Commercial/ retail . East: Fairview Terrace Mobile Home Park . West: Settlers Village Re-subdivision 7. Roadway Improvements Adjacent To and Near the Site The site has access to Fairview Avenue and two local residential stub streets, Teare Avenue and Clarene Street. Fairview Avenue is improved with 5-traffic lanes with no curb, gutter or sidewalk abutting the site. There is curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk located directly to the east of this property and was constructed with carwash that is located on the northwest corner of Jericho Road and Fairview Avenue. Teare Avenue and Clarene Street are improved with 2-traffic lanes (37-feet of pavement) with curb, gutter and 5-toot concrete sidewalk. Jericho Road does not abut the site but would be utilized with the extension of Teare Avenue or Clarene Street. Jericho Road is a collector roadway that is improved with 2-traffic lanes with curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk. 8. Existing Right~of-Way Fairview Avenue is a principal arterial that currently has a total ot 110-feet ot right-of-way (55-feet trom centerline). Teare Avenue and Clarene Street are local residential roadways with a total of 60-feet of right-of-way (30-feet from centerline). 10. Site History On May 7,2000, the Commission reviewed and approved a preliminary plat, Teare Terrace, on this site. Teare Terrace was proposed to be a 13-lot commercial and residential subdivision. This development proposed to extend Clarene Street into the property and extend south to connect to Fairview Avenue. Teare Avenue was proposed to extend into the site as a cul-de-sac on the property. 11. Five Year Work Program There are no improvements in the area that are scheduled in the Five Year Work Program. 12. Signal Location The District has chosen the location of the signal at the commercial/industrial roadway and Fairview Avenue intersection due to the fact that: . This location is at the halt-mile . This location will serve more vehicle trips per day . This location will pull vehicle trips per day off of Jericho Street (a collector roadway with front on housing) and will place the vehicles on a commerciallindustrial roadway . This location will provide the surrounding residential homes with access to a signal 4 . This location can serve more vehicle trips per day on the North side of Fairview Avenue than on the south side of Fairview Avenue B. Findings for Consideration 1. Right-of-Way and Sidewalk District policy requires 120-feet of right-of-way on arterial roadways (Figure 72-F1 B). This right-of- way allows for the construction ot a 7 -lane roadway with curb, gutter, 5-foot concrete detached sidewalks and bike lanes. F airview Avenue is not listed as a proposed project in the District's currently adopted Five-Year Work Program or in the currently adopted 20-year Capital Improvements Plan. As such, the applicant cannot receive reimbursement for dedicated right-ot-way trom available collected impact tees. The applicant shall do one of the following: a. Dedicate by donation an additional 5-feet of right-of-way along Fairview Avenue, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum of 53-feet trom the centerline of the right-of-way. b. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum of 53-feet trom the centerline ot the right-of-way, in an easement provided to the District. c. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-toot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. Roadway Offsets District policy 7204.11.6, requires local roadways to align or offset a minimum of 300-feet trom an arterial roadway (measured centerline to centerline). The applicant is proposing to construct a commerciallindustrial roadway that intersects with Fairview Avenue 310-feet east otthe west property line. This roadway location meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 3. Street Sections District policy 7202.8 and 72-F1 S, requires roadways abutting commercial developments to be constructed as a 40-toot street section with curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of right-of-way. The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial/industrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This roadway is proposed to cul-de-sac just before the proposed multi-family residential apartment complex. This roadway will also provide a link that will connect into Teare Avenue. The proposed commerciallindustrial roadway that the applicant is proposing will consist of a 40-foot street section that includes 2-travellanes, a center turn lane, curb, gutter and 5-foot concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of right-of-way. The proposed street section meets District policy and should be approved with this application. 5 4. Driveways District policy F2-F5, requires driveways located on collector or arterial roadways with a speed limit of 35 to align or offset a minimum of 150-teet trom any existing or proposed driveway. District policy F2-F4 (1) and 72-F4 (2), requires driveways located on commerciallindustrial roadways to offset a controlled and/or uncontrolled intersection a minimum of 50-teet (measured near edge to near edge). District policy 7207.9.3 restricts commercial driveways with daily traffic volumes over 1,000 vehicles to a maximum width ot 35-feet. Most commercial driveways will be constructed as curb-cut type facilities if located on local streets. Curb return type driveways with 15-toot radii will be required for driveways accessing collector and arterial roadways. Fairview Avenue Drivewav The applicant is proposing to construct one 30-foot wide driveway on Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to intersect Fairview Avenue approximately 205-feet west of the east property line. This driveway meets District policy and should be approved with this application. Commercial/Industrial Street Drivewavs The applicant is proposing to construct thirteen driveways on the proposed commerciallindustrial roadway. The driveways are proposed to be constructed in the tOllowing locations. · Driveway number 1 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 54-feet north ot Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to be 25- teet in width. · Driveway number 2 and 3 are proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 175-feet north of Fairview Avenue. These driveways are proposed to align with one another. These driveways are proposed to be 17 -feet in width. · Driveway number 4 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 235-teet north ot Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to be 21-teet in width. · Driveway number 5 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends north from Fairview Avenue approximately 580-feet north of Fairview Avenue. This driveway is proposed to be 22-feet in width. · Driveway number 6 is proposed to extend directly north ot the commerciallindustrial roadway and proposed to intersect the northern portion of the cul-de-sac. This driveway is proposed to be 45-feet in width. · Driveway number 7 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 50-feet east of the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This driveway is proposed to be 27-feet in width. · Driveway number 8 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 255-feet east ot the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This driveway is proposed to be 20-teet in width · Driveway number 9 is proposed to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 430-teet east of the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north. This driveway are proposed to be 25-feet in width. 6 · Driveways number 10 and number 11 are proposed to be 30-teet in width and located on the east and west side of the commerciallindustrial roadway just north of the proposed roundabout. · Driveway number 12 and 13 are proposed to be 30-teet in width and located on the east and west side of the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 160-feet north ot the proposed roundabout. All ot the proposed driveway locations meet District policy in regard to location. All of the proposed driveway widths meet District policy EXCEPT for driveway number 6. Driveway number 6 should be constructed a maximum of 35-feet in width. 5. All Driveways Graveled driveways abutting public streets create maintenance problems due to gravel being tracked onto the roadway. In accordance with District policy, 7207.9.1, the applicant should be required to pave the driveway its tull width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement of the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-toot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 6. Stub Streets District policy 7203.5.1 and 7205.5 requires stub streets to provide intra-neighborhood circulation and to provide access to adjoining parcels. District policy 7203.3.2 requires an existing street or a street in an approved preliminary plat, which extends at a boundary of a proposed development to be extended into that development. The applicant is proposing to extend Teare Avenue. This extension will provide a connection from Teare Avenue to Fairview Avenue. The extension of Teare Avenue meets the goals and intent ot District policy and has the supportive ot District staff. The District held a neighborhood meeting on Thursday March 20,2003. The Teare Avenue extension was approved by the Meridian City Council on March 25, 2003 after a number ot neighborhood concerns arose. Modification of Policv The applicant is proposing to terminate Clarene Street at its current location and construct temporary bollards for emergency access only. District policy requires that stub streets be constructed and/or extended to adjoining properties to provide reasonable access and intra-neighborhood connectivity. Staff would generally support the extension ot Clarene Street into the site, but due to the fact that the applicant is extending Teare Avenue to the residential neighborhood that is located to the northeast, staff is supportive ot the applicant's proposal to construct bollards at the terminus of Clarene Street. With the construction of bollards, Clarene Street will be one-lot and less than 150-teet in depth, therefore, the applicant will not be required to construct a temporary turnaround. 6. Turnarounds District policy 7204.9.2 requires turnarounds to be constructed to provide a minimum turning radius of 55-teet. The applicant is proposing to dedicate a hammerhead turnaround at the west end of Clarene Street on the applicant's property. This hammerhead turnaround will function as the property's frontage until the preliminary plat is submitted and the roadways are formally dedicated. This hammerhead turnaround is required to have bollards installed at the terminus of Clarene Street where the 7 hammerhead begins. The applicant should also enter into a license agreement for the maintenance of the hammerhead turnaround on Clarene Street due to the fact that the District will be unable to access the turnaround. The applicant is proposing to provide a permanent "hammerhead" easement to the District at the terminus of North Lark Avenue. This easement is acceptable to the District but must be approved by the Meridian Fire Department. The applicant should provide a permanent "hammerhead" easement to the District at the terminus of the commercial/industrial roadway and provide documentation to the District showing the review and approval of this configuration from the Meridian Fire Department. 7. Roundabout The applicant is proposing to construct a roundabout within the commercial/industrial roadway approximately 530-feet north ot Fairview Avenue. The roundabout should be designed with 21-toot street sections on either side of the center island. The applicant will be required to dedicate sufficient right-of-way on either side ot an island. Coordinate the size and design ot the roundabout with traffic services staff. 8. Signalization The applicant is proposing to construct a new signal at the intersection ot Fairview Avenue and the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends north into the site. The signal is proposed at the halt mile. The traffic study determined that the warrants would be met and that the existing signals in the area would not be significantly impacted by the new signal. The District will contribute the hardware necessary tor the construction ot the new signal and any related roadway improvements. The applicant should plan, construct and install the signal that is proposed at the intersection of Fairview Avenue and the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends north into the site. C. Site Specific Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall do one of the following: Dedicate by donation an additional 5-feet of right-of-way along Fairview Avenue, and construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum of 53-feet from the centerline ot the right-of-way. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located a minimum ot 53-teet trom the centerline of the right-of-way, in an easement provided to the District. Do not dedicate additional right-of-way, but construct a minimum 5-foot wide concrete sidewalk along Fairview Avenue, located at the back edge of the existing right-of-way. Accomplish all necessary adjustments to properly accommodate existing drainage and utilities. 2. Construct and install the signal and any related roadway improvements that are necessary tor the proposed signal at the intersection of Fairview Avenue and the commercial/industrial roadway that extends north into the site. 3. Construct a commerciallindustrial roadway that intersects with Fairview Avenue 310-feet east of the west property line, as proposed. 8 4. Construct the internal roadways as 40-foot street sections with curb, gutter and 5-toot concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of right-of-way, as proposed. The portion of the commercial/industrial roadway that connects to Teare Avenue shall taper appropriately to accommodate for drainage. 5. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway to intersect Fairview Avenue approximately 205-feet west of the east property line, as proposed. 6. Construct a 25-toot wide driveway to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 54- feet north ot Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 7. Construct two 17-foot wide driveway to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 175-feet north of Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 8. Construct a 21-foot wide driveway to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway approximately 235- teet north of Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 9. Construct a 22-foot wide driveway to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway that extends north from Fairview Avenue approximately 580-feet north of Fairview Avenue, as proposed. 10. Construct a driveway with a maximum width ot 35-feet to extend directly north of the commerciallindustrial roadway and proposed to intersect the northern portion ot the cul-de-sac. 11. Construct a 27 -foot wide driveway to intersect the commerciallindustrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 50-feet east of the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends trom Fairview Avenue to the north, as proposed. 12. Construct a 20-foot wide driveway to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 255-feet east of the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north, as proposed. 13. Construct a 25-toot driveway to intersect the commercial/industrial roadway that runs east and west and is proposed to be located approximately 430-feet east of the commerciallindustrial roadway that extends from Fairview Avenue to the north, as proposed. 14. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the east side of the commercial/industrial roadway just north of the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 15. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the west side of the commerciallindustrial roadway just north of the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 16. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the east side of the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 160-feet north of the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 17. Construct a 30-foot wide driveway located on the west side of the commerciallindustrial roadway approximately 160-teet north of the proposed roundabout, as proposed. 18. Pave the driveways their full width and at least 30-feet into the site beyond the edge of pavement ot the roadway and install pavement tapers with 15-toot radii abutting the existing roadway edge. 19. Extend Teare Avenue as a 40-foot street section with curb, gutter and 5~foot concrete sidewalk within 54-feet of right-ot-way, as proposed. 9 20. Terminate Clarene Street at its current location and construct bollards for emergency access only, as proposed. 21. Enter into a license agreement for the maintenance of the hammerhead turnaround on Clarene Street due to the fact that the District will be unable to access the turnaround. 22. Provide a permanent "hammerhead" easement to the District at the terminus of the commerciallindustrial roadway and provide documentation to the District showing that this configuration has been reviewed and approved by the Meridian Fire Department. 23. Construct a roundabout within the commercial/industrial roadway approximately 530-feet north of Fairview Avenue. Design the roundabout with a minimum of 21-foot street sections on either side of the center island. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way on either side ot an island. Coordinate the size and design of the roundabout with traffic services staff. 24. Comply with all Standard Conditions of Approval. D. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Any existing irrigation facilities shall be relocated outside ot the right-of-way. 2. All utility relocation costs associated with improving street frontages abutting the site shall be borne by the developer. 3. Replace any existing damage curb, gutter and sidewalk and any that may be damaged during the construction of the proposed development. Contact Construction Services at 387-6280 (with file number) tor details. 4. All design and construction shall be in accordance with the Ada County Highway District Policy Manual, ISPWC Standards and approved supplements, Construction Services procedures and all applicable ACHD Ordinances unless specifically waived herein. An engineer registered in the State of Idaho shall prepare and certify all improvement plans. 5. The applicant shall submit revised plans for staff approval, prior to issuance of building permit (or other required permits), which incorporates any required design changes. 6. Construction, use and property development shall be in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Ada County Highway District prior to District approval for occupancy. 7. Payment of applicable road impact fees are required prior to building construction in accordance with Ordinance #195, also known as Ada County Highway District Road Impact Fee Ordinance. 8. It is the responsibility of the applicant to verity all existing utilities within the right-ot-way. Existing utilities damaged by the applicant shall be repaired by the applicant at no cost to ACHD. The applicant shall be required to call DIGLlNE (1-800-342-1585) at least two full business days prior to breaking ground within ACHD right-ot-way. The applicant shall contact ACHD Traffic Operations 387- 6190 in the event any ACHD conduits (spare or filled) are compromised during any phase of construction. 10 9. No change in the terms and conditions of this approval shall be valid unless they are in writing and signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative and an authorized representative of the Ada County Highway District. The burden shall be upon the applicant to obtain written confirmation of any change from the Ada County Highway District. 10. Any change by the applicant in the planned use of the property which is the subject of this application, shall require the applicant to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, plans, or other regulatory and legal restrictions in force at the time the applicant or its successors in interest advises the Highway District of its intent to change the planned use ot the subject property unless a waiver/variance of said requirements or other legal relief is granted pursuant to the law in effect at the time the change in use is sought. E. Conclusions of Law 1. The proposed site plan is approved, if all of the Site Specitic and Standard Conditions of Approval are satisfied. 2. ACHD requirements are intended to assure that the proposed use/development will not place an undue burden on the existing vehicular and pedestrian transportation system within the vicinity impacted by the proposed development. Attachments 1. Vicinity map 2. Submitted site plan 11 Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action 1. Request for Reconsideration of Commission Action: A Commissioner, a member of ACHD staff or any other person objecting to any final action taken by the Commission may request reconsideration of that action, provided the request is not for a reconsideration of an action previously requested to be reconsidered, an action whose provisions have been partly and materially carried out, or an action that has created a contractual relationship with third parties. a. Only a Commission member who voted with the prevailing side can move for reconsideration, but the motion may be seconded by any Commissioner and is voted on by all Commissioners present. It a motion to reconsider is made and seconded it is subject to a motion to postpone to a certain time. b. The request must be in writing and delivered to the Secretary of the Highway District no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to the Commission's next scheduled regular meeting following the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken. Upon receipt of the request, the Secretary shall cause the same to be placed on the agenda tor that next scheduled regular Commission meeting. c. The request for reconsideration must be supported by written documentation setting forth new facts and information not presented at the earlier meeting, or a changed situation that has developed since the taking of the earlier vote, or information establishing an error ot tact or law in the earlier action. The request may also be supported by oral testimony at the meeting. d. If a motion to reconsider passes, the effect is the original matter is in the exact position it occupied the moment before it was voted on originally. It will normally be returned to ACHD staff for further review. The Commission may set the date ot the meeting at which the matter is to be returned. The Commission shall only take action on the original matter at a meeting where the agenda notice so provides. e. At the meeting where the original matter is again on the agenda for Commission action, interested persons and ACHD staff may present such written and oral testimony as the President of the Commission determines to be appropriate, and the Commission may take any action the majority of the Commission deems advisable. f. If a motion to reconsider passes, the applicant may be charged a reasonable fee, to cover administrative costs, as established by the Commission. 12 ..... ... I I I '[-'-1! \-..-,1 LJI 'J Ll -- r/ r I I J U \ \ , I J 'i: ' , i I ; I ~ 'I!,-.L,-J '-, - - .---~--+'--'-:U--'-\ Tl--/~'~L_-LL._- - "..,J~I-L___L_ ,-,~,LriT~'r~----r-t!-t"'I_ I ;~-=: ["-C~t"-=-~'-a=)~ !~[-T~ r=l~~=r I : '- ,.,,-1 : ",--- i 'I /-,,,,.-',---' -----',--"r . [-"------' i I I i'---~ .......(' :: ,., ,;.___..\, . I J I . '------'[-----.-'----..---r--.------."" '-.". ,---- __ . '._ I . I~=-. .,- '/---1 I J II . / /~">" r__",..: "'-<'" i"" \,", /':::'-:~ I --' .--...... -"---' --- -.-.... ___1-__. ,.... -.L~/ ", I ' I-------'-",~ "':- ( [r , '. ", / /1 "._ __ _,_m _. -r"'''-'" \ ' I \ I- . //'rr"-I--T-'i fi""'--'[-TT-"~""'I' []! [Tl J-" ~'''~ \-r'l'/,>'- 1"'''':- " I I I . ------- '" .,---..---- ----- -----..,,,..----'---,-,--'-------,,,. '---'-,L_c::..,..mL_--L-__L r-TI" L~_ T""--j ---:---'-;"--"""r. /'/--' .,-----'-., 't-----'--.--~---F'"' ,- - ~- -- , I ! ./ ',;---" l;,' / ....r. i --' I' ~"'I--I fT I _ '_,_, ' '", __', _.___ ' ( , . '-.....z / '. '-J I I - '- , ---- ,,- I ~-, , -', ',- 'i . -- -- -, --.-",'" '<. '--'" . 1 J.-. ,--" i : ._---J _.._.._ 1- (__I-...--C1 '-..".=L " "_ ./ I _'_~~_~:=--;>' I _,i .;,==j= ) , 1 r-J- -- , '-, , . 1--,,---- \'..(1 ,-. ,'-'- -, .,,,..--, --".. j '---- \, f--------' i-I ", . ..,_..1 ---\. ",; - i.. -1 . ----jL I I / \ ----"I---<i"-\ - -!.- ,. .. i : j '- -. '~--.--., '--"-r--"---'-'~--_J_l._ \___ --,,--.,----,----J I ~mIJ1JTn I [,lJ ---------.-.-.~-- -- ,---~R'--.,:..... I" I--r-- --. ". __: " I, ~_ _..._ ,C, .., ", i 1 ,__c_L-----j--,_L, I' rrT [IIll '""''''--------1' -.---'..'T---', L - rU ....--]SJ:.,;~1-=7 =-~I i~------I~-----I--..- a:: E' C --"--',''- -I-.---------.---~----i '-----1--- --~---- -, . - ' " , I -.... ., '-"-", t I I i: !' --- I -- ; , I - -I ---."1 C-.....'........---------, ",' ,'- -.- '~;" --~ ::.:~-- I' i i " T] i J ~ -----..-. - :-----1 --- /.----1 ~ 0] ~ I :-----0 ~1rf;f-~ 'f- _J: ~-'--l --'-----j-- ,W--I en I l I! : , 1"--'''''''''T--'.''=tI--- I I I 1 . - "[ ---.----,-~--..-- I -- ,/ ----. '-'=;,1- '....., I 1---- T.- ,--,., --, I '''-------' ' -'. I ' L-'LJ ;L-- --... !::.l_L,_.O .--_______L_J - "",--" .,;, .. Z' - -" -..---......-------l-ll-'-T F1Arl.~ VIEW rcrrl[~:I~J: r~--7~ --- I.__,__L_- I __m., I ),,~I: m I i ------,- I I I' ....( I I I i ,! ,".f "L--\:i Z ! ! ' i ''--'--., 1 : 1-'-1/'i I i I "--, , ,: R-III J .____.__----~, 'I "---, ' '-'..__.1 . .' ~ ------,-'-- ,,_ ""1 i' 'I UJ I ' i--- i =i \:''':;,'/.,.n i I I I ---'--"'-', l' , , - (~, , ,--' --.l ,-- --- .r-.------' --".."..,,-- .----, ',~ .... i ! ; :..--- r -- --,../ /r~[---'" ,----,-~-.. !--i----..--'-. '['.'.\/ " \/ ,/"\ , I' : ;-,---~ 1--- /-'"[-' :' "'.. J' i.__.~ '. ____, I. .- //' C.,,\ . . ,--"--,,. / 1: '- ' .-' - r ~-- \ ' -f-----l i :--~: L__ ~~- --- --"I ----{,---J,__.J, --- -~-,-';,-~,-,X..".~:. ,\,/)., : ,.:=}----------- \ -1 \ J H ~ I,. f (/, ~-- '-----, '-'--'--k'~--" ,r-T-'-'J"-<r-1___ \-.-< ~~----~ '\='~--\:~"--,, i -_.L \L_~(/~:~\\//'>\ i I '~-. -' r 1 ...' '- ' --.--, lJIl L" -- \ / . .'----.: I.~- _.~ I ',::,.I~" ',.' \', /)\~ ___/", ' (~~,l~ .;) t ....,j , \. /' ,,' I , , ,---- ~~--..-".- ----: . '--"-~, '\,- =,' .- - \' ,/~;~'\ j:~=, ,..., -- ~='~:=:->--._,_.), ! , , ..". \,--1 / \-/~. '. i "I ,.~ hi~.\/\/\~m~ \,. I . ....,.~. j ., . .. t..~ i :ll . _ r , ,. 13 II Development Process Checklist ] i:8]Submit a development application to a City or to the County i:8]The City or the County '-"ill transmit the development application to ACHD 0The ACHD Plannlnl RevIew DIvisIon will receive the de'iclopment application to review ~The PlannIng Review DivisIon will do Q!1! of the following: OSend a "No Revlew"letter to the applicant stating that there are no site specific requirements at this time. I8ISend a "Comply Wltb" letter to the applicant stating that iethe development is within a platted subdivision or part of a previous development application and that the site specific requirements from the previous development also apply to this development application. OWnte a Staff Level report analyzing the impactl of tbe development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for itl confonnance to District Policy. OWnte a Commlsslo. Level report analyzing the impacts of the development on the transportation system and evaluating the proposal for its confonnance to District Policy. OTIle Planning Review Division wil1 hold a TechDleal Review meeting for all StalT aael Commlulo. Level repo..... C8'!For ALL development applications. including those receivins a "No Review" or "Comply With" letter: . The applicant should submit two (2) sets of engineered plans directly to ACHD for review by ttie Development Review Dlvlslo. for plan review an4 assessment of impact fees. (Note: if there are no site improvements requited by ACHD. then architectural plans may be submitted for purposes of impact fee calculation.) . The applicant is required to get a permit from Construction Services (ACHO) for Ara. work in the nght-of.way, including. but not limited to, driveway approaches. street improvements and utility cull. DPay Impact Fees prior to issuance of building permit. Impaa fees cannot be paid prior to plan review approval. DID YOU REMEMBER: Construction (Zone) o Drive".,. or Property Approach(s) . Submit a "Driveway Approach Request" ronn to Ada County Highway District (ACHD) Construction (for approval by Development Services It Traffic Services). There is a one week turnaround for this approval. o WorklDII. tlae ACHD Rlpt.ol-W." . Four business days prior to starting work have a bonded contractor submit a "Temporary Highway Vse Pc:rmit Application" to ACHD Consb'Uction - PermiLl aJonl with: a) Traffic Control Plan b) An Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative &: Plat. done by a Certified Plan Designer, if trench is >50' or you are placing >600 sf of concrete or asphalt. C onstructio" (Subdivisions) o Sedlmeat 1& Erollo. SubmJttaJ . At least one week prior to setting up a Pre-Con an Erosion & Sediment Control ~alTarive &: Plat, done by a Certined Plan Designer, must be turned into ACHD ConstrucliurI- SubJi\lision to be relJiewed alld approved by the ACHD Drainage Dillision. o Idallo Power Comp'D' · Vie Steelman at Idaho Power must have his IPCO approved set of subdivision utility plans prior to Pre-Con being scheduled. o Flul Approval rrom DeVffopm~at Servf(rI · ACHD Construction - Subdivision must have received approval from Development Services plior to scheduling a Pre-Cen.