HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 19, 2006 P&Z Minute
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
October 19, 2006
Page 82 of 84
Borup: I think in my mind it depends on what the use is. If it's a Maverick store, then,
you don't want to be crossing all the other properties. If it's another office building or
something, then - or a retail or something, that would be appropriate, but we don't know
that.
Newton.Huckabay: Okay. And I believe that is the end.-
Rohm: End of motion?
Hood: There is not much of a staff report left, but ..
Zaremba: Second.
Newton.Huckabay: Duly noted.
Rohm: Okay. Good job, Commissioner Newton.Huckabay. It's been moved and
seconded that we forward onto City Council recommending approval of AZ 06.048 and
PP 06--050, to include all staff comments with the changes as stated. All those in favor
say aye. Opposed seme sign? Motion carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Rohm: All right. We have got one more Public Hearing, so -
Newton-Huckabay: We do?
Item 14:
Public Hearing: CPA 06-004 Request for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to modify the definition of "Office" by removing the last
sentence of the description (see Chapter VII, page 106, June 2006
printing of the Comprehensive Plan) for Office Designation Text
Amendment by the City of Meridian Planning Department:
Rohm: Yes. Just a short one. Very short. At this time I'd like to open CPA 06-004, a
request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to modify definition of office.
Hood: Thank you, Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission. We are proposing to
amend some text within the Comprehensive Plan relative to resolution 04-454, which is
commonly used for residentially designated properties on arterials that want to go to
office space, because they are less than three acres in size, but have frontage on an
arterial street. Recently the Council has made an interpretation that it goes vice-versa
and if you're office you can ask for residential, essentially. That was not the intent of
resolution 454. We are cleaning this up so it really only applies to those resident --
pretty much residential properties, existing homes that back out of their driveways today
as a single family home and they want to convert theirs to office. To do so, not for
someone that is supposed to be office asking for residential. So, that is the clarification.
Meridian Planning & Zoning CommiSSion
October 19, 2006
Page 83 of 84
We are proposing to remove the last sentence within office designation as currently
written in the Comp Plan and I will stand for any questions you may have.
Rohm: Thank you.
Zaremba: Mr. Chairman?
Rohm: Commissioner Zaremba.
Zaremba: I would note that the room is empty of public, therefore, nobody intends to
add any public testimony and, therefore, I move to close the Public Hearing on CPA 06-
004.
Moe: Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing on CPA 06-004. All
in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion carries.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Zaremba: Mr. Chairman?
Rohm: Commissioner Zaremba.
Zaremba: I move we forward onto City Council recommending approval of CPA 06.004,
to include all staff comments.
Moe: Second.
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to forward onto City Council recommending
approval of CPA 06-004, All those in favor say aye. Opposed same sign? Motion
carried.
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Borup: I thought we had a Commissioner that said she wasn't going to make another
motion, but that could still happen.
Moe: Mr. Chairman, I move we adjourn.
Borup: Oh, you didn't do it.
Zaremba: You still stole the thunder. I'll second it.
Newton-Huckabay: No, actually, I was going to stay here and wait you guys out.
Meridian Planning & Zoning Commission
October 19, 2006
Page 84 of 84
Rohm: It's been moved and seconded to adjourn. All those in favor say aye. Opposed
same sign?
MOTION CARRIED: ALL AYES.
Rohm: We are adjourned.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 12:03 A.M.
(TAPE ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.)
APPROVED:
I I
DATE APPROVED
MICHAEL E. ROHM - CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
WILLIAM G. BERG, JR, CITY CLERK