Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC - Commission Recommendation and Staff Report for 10-15 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,­, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 10/15/2024 Legend DATE: • Project Location I�.. TO: Mayor&City Council :--Area of Impact += City Limits , FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner 0 Analysis 208-884-5533 lritter@meridiancity.org ; ,- APPLICANT: Nicolette Womack,Kimley-Horn - y}( ' .. I '^S� SUBJECT: H-2024-0019 - - Centrepoint Apartments -ALT, CUP, `- MDA r . LOCATION: Project is located at 3030 N. Cajun Lane and 3100 N. Centrepoint Way,near the southwest corner of N. Eagle Road and E.Ustick Road,in the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 5,Township 3N,Range 1 E. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Modifications to the existing Development Agreement(DA)H-2022-0035 and Conditional Use Permit(CUP)H-2022-0072 to facilitate the construction of a 279-unit multifamily affordable apartment project. This proposal strictly pertains to the residential component of the approved development plan. The applicant is also requesting alternative compliance to the open space and parking lot landscaping. B. Issues/Waivers The applicant is requesting alternative compliance for the following: • Reduction in qualified open space as the applicant is deficient by 8,940 square feet. • Removal of the parking lot islands under the covered parking internal to the parking lots. The applicant is requesting the following modification to the Development Agreement and CUP: • Modify the CUP to increase the building height to forty-five(45)feet instead of three(3) stories. • Increase the number of units from two hundred thirteen(213)to two hundred seventy- nine(279), an increase of sixty-four(64)additional units. C. Recommendation Staff. Approval of the proposed development. Planning and Zoning Commission: Denial City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview D. Decision Select: Pending. City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview IL COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Vacant - Proposed Land Use(s) Multi-family - Existing/Proposed Zoning C-G VII.A.2 Future Land Use Designation Mixed-Use Regional VII.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date Wednesday,May 8,2024 Neighborhood Meeting 4/22/2024;6 attendees Site posting date 8/23/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/issue Reference Ada County Highway District III.H • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access E.Ustick Road/Centerpointe Way - • Traffic Level of Service E.Ustick Road-Better than"E"/Centrepointe Way—N/A — ITD Comments Received (Yes/No, Staff Report or Other IILI Meridian Fire Distance to Station:1.4 miles;Response Time: 3 minutes F 0 Meridian Police Distance to Station: 5 miles;Response Time:4:30 minutes Meridian Public Works Wastewater Distance to Mainline: (Input Distance);Impacts or III.B Concerns: (yes/no) Meridian Public Works Water Distance to Mainline: (Input Distance);Impacts or III.B Concerns: (yes/no) School District(s) West Ada School District upw III.G • Capacity of Schools River Valley Elementary-600;Lewis and Clark Middle - School- 1,000;Centennial High School- 1,900 • Number of Students Enrolled River Valley Elementary-457;Lewis and Clark Middle - School-901;Centennial High School- 1,793 See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section and public record for all department/agency comments received. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:51105110111 Date Retrieved:2024/6/21 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage Infill Indicator: 1,078 Surrounding Area r 231 v 'l G to Not City 0 4& ® City Limits 2,701 1,223. ■ Not City Household Household& Population Growth Households 02020 Population Change:9.5°I° Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 10,000 20,000 30,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 3196 29% 7% Multi-family 6 ® Commercial Preliminary Plats (last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 200 400 600 0 500 1000 150C 2000 ■ Single-family Multi-family Figure 2:ACHD Summary Metrics E. Ustick Road Existing Lanes © Planned Lanes NotableExisting Level of Service a (Primary roadway impact) Programmed IFYP m Programmed CIP m City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Figure 3: Service Impact Summary Ready Q O O O O O O O O Marginal Caution O O e c \ooa ¢ o\z �y any \�\o� o\ o\ o�6 0 o h`ro Qa 0 2.00 1,500 Single-family H 01 1.50 41 Residential b 1,000 Parcel Diversity y 1.00 0.9F U 0Parcel Count 0.50 500 L + m `� Ave rage Acres 0.00 a a 0 a R-2 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 ResidentialDensity 11.30 Q 10.00 p 5.00 �4.15 �5.26 ���� 0.00 ' 1°2 Dwelling Units I Acre R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The subject site is designated Mixed-Use Regional(MU-R) on the future land use map and is part of a much larger area of MU-R along the Eagle Road corridor that includes The Village, Regency at River Valley apartments, as well as multiple other commercial users and a large undeveloped area. Specifically, within the MU-R area in this southwest corner of Eagle and Ustick, there is the Jackson Square development and commercial buildings to the south and on the hard corner to the northeast. The Comprehensive Plan discusses that projects should not contemplate uses across arterials even if they share the same future land use designation as it is not anticipated for users or residents to readily walk or bike across these transportation facilities. However, Staff finds it prudent to analyze all projects in this area with at least the four corners of development around the Ustick and Eagle intersection because, in reality, the transportation impacts and expected users will come from and go beyond just the southwest corner of this intersection. To the north are a number of big box stores (Kohl's, Dick's, and Hobby Lobby) and the new Brickyard vertically integrated development; to the north east is Lowe's and various other commercial and restaurant buildings; to the east is Trader Joe's, multiple restaurants, and the Verraso townhomes; and to the southeast are traditional garden style apartments, restaurant users, and the Village. In terms of the ratio of commercial to residential within this area, there is currently a healthy mix of commercial and residential uses within walking distance of each other. Staff finds the addition of the proposed multi family development limited to the number of units in the existing development agreement near the existing and proposed commercial development would offer residential to support the mix of commercial uses in this area. Therefore, Staff believes the proposed project as currently approved through the existing CUP is generally consistent with the MU-R designation because the subject MU-R area currently consists of a number of retail, restaurant, office, and residential uses available to the region and the addition of these units should not over saturate this area with residential. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2018-0121 (Villasport CUP,MDA);H-2022-0035 (MDA,DA Inst. #2022-079000);A-2023-0064(CZC,DES) Phasing Plan 1 Residential Units 279 Multi-family units Open Space 2.60 acres(113,266 s.f.)required/2.40 acres(104,345 s.f)of qualified open space proposed Amenities A total of 8 amenities has been proposed-See amenity exhibit in Section VII below. Physical Features None Acreage N/A Lots 1 Density 27.9 units per acre City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis Figure 4:Mixed Use Analysis by Land Use Area Mixed Use Analysis forReport Designation Area: Mixed use Regional Date Retrieved: 20244 26 Lana use Area Dy coning Address Type Split - - - Districts 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100% O C-C O C-G Zoning Variety Acres Annexed 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% Residential ■ R-15 Address-Zoning Mix ❑ Non-residential 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% Address Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family ® Multi-family 303 216 11 303 119 ® Commercial City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis B. History and Process The subject application encompasses one (1)parcel located south of E. Ustick Road. The parcel was part of a Development Agreement Modification and Conditional Use Permit(CUP) application in 2019 that removed the subject parcel from an existing Development Agreement (DA)for the purpose of entering into a new DA with a new conceptual plan and building elevations (H-2018-0121, DA Inst. #2019-060877) and a request for a new athletic club and spa (indoor recreation facility), Villasport. The CUP approval for the indoor recreation facility has since expired and the property was sold. The current CUP and DA (H-2022-0035 DA Inst#2022- 079000) was approved to construct a mixed-use development consisting of commercial space and a 215-unit multi family development in lieu of an athletic club/spa and commercial building. The proposed CUP and DA modification proposes a deed restricted affordable multi family development with 279 units. C. Site Development and Use Analysis The submitted conceptual site plan (Exhibit VII.D)depicts five (5) multi family buildings with internal access. The multi family is split into three(3) 4-story buildings on the larger area of the site east of Centrepoint Way, one (1) 4-story building west of Centrepoint Way and one(1) 4- story building on the east side of Cajun Lane. The submitted landscape plan shows a 25 foot landscape buffer along the west and southern perimeter of the property. According to the specific use standards for multi family development(UDC 11-4-3-27), common open space may not be counted towards the required minimum when it is adjacent to arterials unless approved through the CUP process. Therefore, the proposed open space shown may not all be qualified open space if Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council do not approve it in its current location. This is concerning because if the Commission does not approve it, the proposed site plan and open space will be further diminished from complying with the minimum open space standards and revisions would likely be needed. The previously approved CUP and MDA: • Maximum of two hundred fifty-one(215) units • Limited building height limited to three (3)stories • Met the intent of the open space requirements • Provided the following qualifying amenities: a clubhouse with a business lounge,plaza areas, a swimming pool, a fitness facility, an outdoor kitchen, a dog run, a micro path system, sports courts, and a bicycle repair room.All of the proposed amenities except the proposed dog run are located within the central open space area or part of the three(3) central buildings. The proposed amendment to the CUP and MDA: • Two hundred seventy-nine (279) units • Requesting four(4)stories and an increase in building height to 45 feet. • Does not meet the open space requirement(deficient by 8,940 sJ). The applicant is asking for alternative compliance for qualified open space requirement stating the site is irregular, has a unique targeted demographic of an affordable housing community, has significant indoor and outdoor passive and active amenities and excellent connectivity to public parks within walking distance.Although the project is located less than one-mile from the Charles F. McDevitt Youth Sports Complex, Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park and Champion Park; the residents would have to cross either Ustick Road, a residential arterial or Eagle Road, a State highway to access them. • Proposing the following qualifying amenities: a clubhouse with a fitness facility; children's play structure; dog park with a waste station; shaded picnic area with BBQ City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis grills, tables, benches and landscaping;shaded plaza/courtyard with activity lawn; a micro path system, sports courts and a bicycle repair area. The sports courts and dog park are located near N. Cajun Lane. Based on the analysis, staff feels the applicant is proposing too many units for development to be compliant with the Comprehensive Plan and UDC requirements. Staff feels if the proposal loses the parallel parking stalls along the north property line and relocate the open space away from Ustick Road, an arterial, it would be a nice addition to the community. 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There are no existing structures on the site. The applicant will need to submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Design Review(DES) application for review and approval prior to building submittal. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): Stafffinds the proposed use of multi family to be generally consistent with the MU-R designation because the subject MU-R area currently consists of several retail, restaurant, office, and residential uses available to the region and the addition of these units would not over-saturate this area with residential. City Council approved the existing modification to the current development agreement(MDA DA Inst. #2022-079000) in July 2022 (H-2022- 0035) with a reduction in units from what was originally submitted. The applicant is proposing and additional sixty-four(64) units above the approved 215 units. The main points of discussion through the MDA process were regarding traffic,parking, and the proposed building heights. City Council required each "area"of the project to be self- parked so that residents would not have to cross any drive aisle or Centrepoint Way to get to their assigned parking space. Although buildings A, Bl and B2 within the proposed development are not self-parked within their respective areas of the site, as shown in the table below, the proposal meets the parking requirement as outlined in UDC 11-3C. The applicant is requesting a modification to the existing DA to increase the number of units and increase the building height from three (3)stories to forty-five (45)feet in height instead of stories. Staff feels in order to maintain cohesiveness with the surrounding area, the building height should remain as shown on the proposed concept plan below. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed development is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the C-G zoning district and those within the specific use standards for Multi-family Development discussed above(UDC 11-4-3-27). The submitted plans show compliance with all dimensional and specific use standards, including but not limited to, building height, setbacks, accesses, and required parking spaces. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The applicant shall meet the requirements for Multi-Family (UDC 11-4-3-27). See section V. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Existing structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan 3.07.01A, UDC 11-3A-19): There are no existing structures on the site. The Comprehensive Plan require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening, transitional densities, and other best site design practices. The proposed multi- family residential development provides an appropriate transition between the retail/commercial/employment uses to the north and west and the single-family residences to the south and west. There will be a twenty-five (25)foot buffers between this project and the City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis surrounding developments to the west and south. The sidewalk improvements to Ustick Road, Centrepoint Way and N. Cajun Lane provide much needed access improvements for the single-family residences to walk to the retail and commercial developments in the vicinity to the east. The buildings are set back over 100 feet from the boundaries with single family residential property,providing an even greater buffer between the proposed multi family use and the single-family residences. UDC requires the applicant to submit a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC) and Design Review(DR) applications for review and approval prior to building submittal. 2. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan 2.02.00, Comp Plan 2.02.01B, UDC 11-3G): Per UDC 11-3G-3, qualified open space is defined as active or passive open spaces. Any open space that is active or passive in its intended use,and accessible by all residents of the development, including,but not limited to: Open grassy area of at least five thousand(5,000) square feet in area; Community garden(s); natural waterways, open ditches, and laterals, protective buffers a minimum of ten(10) feet in width dedicated for active access along these natural open spaces count toward meeting the open space minimum requirements; plaza with a minimum dimension of twenty(20)feet in all directions and including hardscape, seating, lighting in conformance with the standards set forth in section 11-3A-I I and landscaping in conformance with the requirements set forth in Article 11-3B, Landscaping Requirements; or linear open space area that is at least twenty(20)feet and up to fifty(50)feet in width,has an access at each end, and is improved and landscaped as set forth in Article 11-3B, Landscaping Requirements. The proposed project will include 104,345 square feet of qualified open space which is 8,940 square feet less than required. The applicant is asking for alternative compliance for qualified open space requirement stating the site is irregular, has a unique targeted demographic of an affordable housing community, has significant indoor and outdoor passive and active amenities and excellent connectivity to public parks within walking distance. The project also includes an extensive network of pedestrian oriented pathways including an outer loop around the entire project with internal connections to the various amenities for the project allowing for free movement of pedestrians throughout the site. The Comprehensive Plan goal is for developments to plan for safe, attractive, and well- maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. The Comprehensive Plan's goal emphasizes the importance of safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods with ample open space and amenities. Reducing these elements, regardless of the parcel's shape or target demographic, contradicts the Plan's standards. Furthermore, the applicant is increasing the density of the site beyond what was previously approved, understanding they are also reducing open space.Adequate open space and amenities are fundamental to maintaining the vibrancy and functionality of a neighborhood. Adhering to the Comprehensive Plan ensures that developments contribute positively to the community and uphold the quality of life for its residents. It's important to recognize that proximity to parks and sports complexes doesn't fully address the need for accessible and usable open space within a neighborhood. Even though the project is less than a mile from Charles F. McDevitt Youth Sports Complex, Julius M. Kleiner Memorial Park, and Champion Park, residents would still face the challenge of crossing major arterial roads to reach these amenities. Pedestrian and bicycle crossing of these major roadways adversely affect signal performance and signal timing, and is one of the stated reasons for mixed use area analysis to not include areas bisected by major roadways. This can be a significant barrier,particularly for families with young children, elderly residents, or those without convenient transportation options. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis For the development to truly align with the Comprehensive Plan's goals, it should include sufficient open space and amenities within the project itself. This ensures that all residents have easy, safe access to recreational areas without the need to navigate busy roads, thereby enhancing the overall quality of life and community cohesion. 3. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets The applicant is required to construct street buffers along Ustick Road, an arterial street, and along Centrepoint Way, a local street. In addition,per UDC 11-3B-8, at least 5 feet of landscaping is required along the perimeter of vehicle use areas(i.e. drive aisles) and landscaping is also required along the base of the multi-family building elevations facing any public street. The applicant is proposing a reduction of the 35'wide landscape buffer along Ustick Road—up to a 50%reduction (17.5), as allowed with the implementation of Water Conserving Design principles (UDC 11-3B-5.0). Staff has no objection to the applicant's request to provide a water conserving design for the street buffer along Ustick Road. ii. Parking lot landscaping Per UDC 11-3B-8,the applicant shall provide perimeter and internal parking lot landscaping to soften and mitigate the visual and heat island effect of a large expanse of asphalt in parking lots, and to improve the safety and comfort of pedestrians. A five-foot wide minimum landscape buffer adjacent to parking, loading, or other paved vehicular use areas. The applicant is proposing Alternative Compliance under UDC 11-3B-7.C.Lc to remove the parking lot islands beneath the covered parking areas within the development. Instead, the applicant plans to install solar carports, which will serve as a green infrastructure amenity by providing an alternative power source for the development and its residents. The solar carports will also fulfill the requirement for covered parking and help reduce the heat impact of the surface parking lot. According to the applicant, the removal ofparking islands under the solar carports will enhance solar panel efficiency by improving daylight capture and reducing maintenance tasks such as clearing leaf debris and replacing plants or trees.Additionally, the solar carports are expected to offset utility costs for residents. The applicant also notes that despite the removal of these islands, the overall landscape buffer percentage will not decrease, as the buffer areas along the east side of Centrepoint Way exceed the city's code requirements. All uncovered parking areas will continue to comply with the requirements for parking lot islands. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses Per UDC 11-3B-9, a landscape buffer is required in the C-N, C-C, C-G,L-O,M-E,H-E, and I-L districts on any parcel sharing a contiguous lot line with a residential land use. The landscape buffer is required in the I-H district on any property sharing a contiguous lot line with a nonindustrial use. The single-family residential neighborhood to the south is screened with a twenty-five (25)foot landscape buffer. The single-family residential neighborhood to the west is likewise screened with a twenty-five (25)foot landscape buffer and further will be screened by an eight(8)foot masonry wall. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Staff finds the proposed landscape buffer adjacent to the residential neighborhoods meets the requirements of the UDC and requires a detail of the masonry wall to be submitted for review with the CZC application. iv. Tree preservation N/A—There are no existing trees on the property. v. Storm integration Per UDC 11-3B-11,the applicant shall meet the intent to improve water quality and provide a natural, effective form of flood and water pollution control through the integration of vegetated,well designed stormwater filtration swales and other green stormwater facilities into required landscape areas, where topography and hydrologic features allow if part of the development. Development will be required to meet UDC 11-3B-11 for stormwater integration. vi. Pathway landscaping Landscaping for pathways shall meet the requirements outlined in UDC 11-3B-12. Staff finds the landscape plan shows the applicant meets the requirements of UDC 11-3B- 12 for pathway landscaping. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking for multi family developments is required to be provided per the table in UDC 11-3C-6 based on the number of bedrooms per unit. The Applicant is proposing 279 units consisting of 1391-bedroom units, 105 2-bedroom units and 35 3-bedroom units. In addition, one(1)guest space for every 10 units is required. i. Residential parking analysis Based on the total number of units proposed and their bedroom count distribution, a minimum of 552 parking spaces, with a minimum of 279 of these spaces to be covered in a garage or by a carport.In addition to meeting the minimum off-street parking amount, the current Development Agreement City Council was not comfortable with the parking area west of Centrepoint Way and expressed a desire for all buildings to be self-parked within their respective areas of the site. The previous applicant provided documentation showing the buildings to be self-parked within their respective areas of the site. Although the buildings within the proposed development are not self-parked within their respective areas of the site, as shown in the table below, the proposal meets the parking requirement as outlined in UDC 11-3C. Area of Site Building Bedroom Count Required Parking Provided(including Parking Per Unit (including guests) guests) (including guests) West of Cajun Ln&East of A-64 units 1 Bed—17 units 423.5(211 covered) 405(249 covered) 1.92(1.18 covered) Centrepoint Way 2 Bed—27 units 3 Bed—20 units B1-79 units 1 Bed—53 units 2 Bed—19 units 3 Bed—7 units B2—68 units 1 Bed—41 units 2 Bed—19 units 3 Bed—8 un its East of Cajun Lane C-44 units 1 Bed—2D units 83(44 covered) 92(17 covered) 2.11(1 covered) 2 Bed—24 units 3 Bed—0 units West of Centrepoint Way ❑—24 units 1 Bed—8 units 46(24 covered) 54(25 covered) 2.25(1.04 covered) 2 Bed—16 units City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis ii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking space is required for every twenty-five(25) vehicle parking spaces per UDC 11-3C-6G. Based on the five hundred seventy-eight(552) vehicle parking spaces, a minimum of twenty-two (22) bicycle parking spaces is required. The location of the bicycle racks has been depicted on the site and landscape plans. Staff finds the applicant meets the requirement for bicycle parking. An example of the bicycle rack will be required to be submitted with the CZC for review and approval. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Administrative Design Review(DES)approval is required before building permit submittal for multi-family residential dwellings. The Applicant did not submit for DES approval concurrent with the subject CUP application so the submitted elevations will be fully analyzed with that future application. Further, an application for a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC)will also be required to be submitted for this entire development before the building permit submission. Conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed multi family buildings as shown in Section VII.G. The applicant is requesting a design exception for the reduced articulation of the building fagade and the omission of the masonry along the base of the building. This an administrative decision to be determined by the director. Final design will be required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual (ASM)and the recorded agreement unless otherwise waived by the Community Development Director through a design exception request. 6. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All fencing constructed on the site is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11- 3A-7. No fencing is shown on the submitted plans except for the eight(8)foot privacy wall along the west boundary, as required by the Development Agreement. The applicant shall include an exhibit of the privacy wall for staff review with the future Certificate of Zoning Compliance (CZC) application.In addition, the applicant shall include any fencing proposed for the noted dog park and sports court area along the existing shared north-south private road N. Cajun Lane. E. Transportation Analysis The Ada County Highway District(ACHD)reviewed the submitted application and has determined they support the applicant's proposal to construct 5-foot wide detached concrete sidewalk abutting the site meets District policy and should be approved, as proposed. However, the sidewalk should be parallel to the roadway, as meandering sidewalks are discouraged under ACHD policy. The detached sidewalk should be located a minimum of 41-feet from the centerline of Ustick Road abutting the site. ACHD also supports the applicant's proposal to widen/reconstruct Centrepoint Way meets District policy and should be approved as proposed with the exception of the 23-foot street section which requires the construction of a 33-foot street section south of the driveways to the site's south property line. The lane configuration and striping at the intersection with Ustick Road should be consistent with Centrepoint Way on the north side of Ustick Road across from the site. The applicant will be responsible for the design and construction of any modifications to the existing signal at the Centrepoint Way/Ustick Road intersection. The applicant should be required to dedicate right-of-way to 2-feet behind back of sidewalk, or for detached sidewalk,the applicant can reduce the right-of-way to 2-feet behind back of curb and provide a permanent a permanent right-of-way easement that extends from the right-of-way line to 2-feet behind back City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis of sidewalk. Sidewalk shall be located wholly within right-of-way or wholly within an easement. See diagram below. 40-FOOT STREET SECTION I ° EEEHIZEHM LJ I I 1 _ - �� BUIpHGA GUIlG1°GF �' ` �� � ,w erxis RronAry I I 1 �v f I I �I 33-FOOT STREET SECTION 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Per UDC 11-3A-3, the intent of these standards is to improve safety by combining and/or limiting access points to collector and arterial streets and ensuring that motorists can safely enter all streets unless waived by City Council. Access for this development is from Centrepoint Way via Ustick Road and N. Cajun Lane via Ustic Road. Both the shared drive aisle and public street are existing. The shared drive aisle connects from N. Cajun Lane (a private street) to the south up to Ustick Road. This drive aisle was required with the previous Villasport approvals and the Wadsworth site on the hard corner for cross-access and interconnectivity to and from Ustick Road.In addition, the Bienville Square plat depicts cross-access over Cajun Lane and out to Eagle Road furthering the previous anticipation that some traffic would flow through this area. N. Centrepoint Way is an existing local street that connects the Bienville Square Subdivision (Jackson Square) and this site to Ustick Road via a public road and is signalized at the intersection of Ustick Road and Centrepoint Way. Ustick Road is improved with 5-travel lanes, vertical curb and gutter abutting the site. A five (5)foot wide detached concrete sidewalk exists abutting the site on the west side of Centrepoint Way and no sidewalk abutting the site on the east side of Centrepoint Way. There is eighty-six(86) to one hundred twenty-two (122)feet of right-of-way for Ustick Road(fifty (50) to eighty(80)feet from centerline). City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multiuse pathways shall be constructed in accord with the city's comprehensive plan, the Meridian Pathways Master Plan, the Ada County Highway District Master Street Map and Roadways to Bikeways Master Plan. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. The Applicant is proposing to construct the missing segment of sidewalk along Ustick Road with a 5-foot wide detached sidewalk, consistent with the UDC requirements. Further, the Applicant is proposing to continue the existing sidewalk along the east side of the shared drive aisle and install a new sidewalk along its west side. The Applicant is proposing 5-foot wide micro paths throughout the development including within linear open space along the western and southern boundaries. 4. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks constructed as part of this proposal are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Detached sidewalks are existing along both sides off. Centrepoint Way and one segment of the attached sidewalk is located along Ustick Road, west of Centrepoint Way; the remaining Ustick Road frontage does not have any existing sidewalk. The applicant is proposing a 5- foot wide detached sidewalk along Ustick Road and the shared drive aisle and is also proposing 5-foot wide micro pathways throughout the development. As noted above, the Applicant is proposing to construct the missing segment of sidewalk along Ustick Road with a 5-foot wide detached sidewalk, consistent with code requirements. Further, the Applicant is proposing to continue the existing sidewalk along the east side of the shared drive aisle and install a new sidewalk along its west side. The Applicant is proposing 5-foot wide micro paths throughout the development including within linear open space along the south boundary. Staff supports the proposed sidewalk and micro path network. In addition, Staff finds that safer pedestrian crossings can be installed consistent with UDC 11-3A-19B across many internal drive aisles that connect internal sidewalks to the perimeter sidewalks. Specifically,per UDC 11-3A-19B.4, the crossings should be constructed with a different material than the driving surface (i.e. brick,pavers, colored or stamped concrete, etc)and be located at any crossing from the main drive aisle connections to Centrepoint or the shared drive aisle on the east side of the site. 5. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): There is an existing private street, N. Cajun Lane, that abuts the east side of the property. Improvements to the private road are required as part of this development. No new private streets are being proposed for this development. F. Services Analysis 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): Per UDC 11-3A-6,requires limiting the tiling and piping of natural waterways, including,but not limited to, ditches, canals, laterals, sloughs and drains where public safety is not a concern as well as improve,protect and incorporate creek corridors(Five Mile,Eight Mile, Nine Mile, Ten Mile, South Slough and Jackson and Evan Drains)as an amenity in all City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis residential, commercial and industrial designs. When piping and fencing is proposed,the standards outlined in UDC 11-3A-6B shall apply. The Milk Lateral has previously been piped and there is a thirty (30)foot irrigation easement that goes through the property. 2. Pressurized Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6). The applicant should be required to use any existing surface or well water for the primary source. If a surface or well source is not available, a single- point connection to the culinary water system shall be required. If a single point connection is utilized, the developer will be responsible for the payment of assessments for the common areas prior to prior to receiving development plan approval. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments by the City's adopted standards, specifications, and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practices as adopted by the City as outlined in UDC 11-3A-18. Storm drainage will be proposed with a future Certificate of Zoning Compliance application and shall be constructed to City and ACHD design criteria. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC I1-3A-21): Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development.All utilities are available to the site. Water main,fire hydrant and water service require a twenty foot(20) wide easement that extends ten (10)feet past the end of main, hydrant, or water meter. No permanent structures, including trees are allowed inside the easement. G. Development Agreement The Applicant is requesting a modification to the existing Development Agreement [Inst. #2022- 079000 to include the following changes: B. OWNER/DEVELOPER has s4mitted an applie A4enonlied for a Modification of the egg Development Agreement(Instrument#2019-060877) for the purpose of updating the concept and a plan and provisions to construct a mixed-use development consisting of commercial space aand a multi-family development in lieu of an athletic club/spa and commercial building on 11.17 acres in the C-G zoning district. The Meridian City Council approved said the Modification and the Addendum to Development Agreement was recorded as Instrument#2022-079000 in Ada County Records. C. CITY, and OWNER/DEVELOPER now desire to amend said Development Agreement and Addendum to Development Agreement,which terms have been approved by the Meridian City Council in accordance with UDC section 11-513-4. 1. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be bound by the terms of the Development Agreement recorded as Instrument#2019-060877, except as specifically amended as follows: a. Future development of this site shall be substantially consistent with the submitted concept plan and color renderings inel aea in Seel o V! e attached to this Second Addendum as Exhibit A l9 and the provisions contained herein. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis b. Future development shall comply with the standards outline in the multi-family development specific use standards, UDC 11-04-3-27, except for any requests for Alternative Compliance approved by the City. c. All future pedestrian crossings that traverse shared drive aisles within the development shall be constructed with brick, pavers, stamped concrete, or colored concrete to clearly delineate the driving surface from the pedestrian facilities,per UDC 11-3A-19B.4b. d. The required landscape street buffers and multi-use pathway segment shall be constructed and vegetated with the first phase of development along E.Ustick Road and N.Eagle Road; the proposed 25-foot landscape buffer along the west and south boundaries shall be constructed with the first phase of development. e. Applicant shall work with ACHD to construct a safe pedestrian crossing from the multi- family site area to the parking lot along the west boundary across N. Centrepoint Way. f. With the future Conditional Use Permit for the multi-family development, the building heights shall.,long the west L.,,,,n,aary shall not be more than not exceed two stories 45-feet in height consistent with the Applicant's revised concept plan and presentation to Council. g. Applicant shall continue the masonry wall along the west property boundary consistent with adjacent development and to help buffer the proposed project. h. Staff and Applicant shall work with ACHD to mark Centrepoint Way as no-parking on both sides, should ACHD allow it. III. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 4-. Development Ag-eemeat TAT d f;e tioai Fifteen(15) days prior-to the City Couneil hearing,the applieant shall pFovide the revised eoneept plan for-the elevations,landseaping plan and open spaee exhibit subjeet to the new it A shall,1.1 The modified PA shall be signed by the pr-epet4y owner-and r-etufned to the Plaffi4ing Division within six(6)months of the City Getmeil approval of the Findings. The DA plan, landseape plans a-ad eeaeepWal building elevations ineluded in Seetion V P b. Before the multi family units are eeeupied, ONN%ef and/of Developer-shall feeOfd within the en4ir-e no more than si*ty per-een4 a. Futufe development of this site shall be generally eensistent with the proposed site 0 City of Meridian I Department Report III. City/Agency Comments &Conditions r;ty shall be deemed t e b ., tb i fd patty beliee fif i=y of sa i .,re+y a�o a0 „l e. All ftitur-e pedest+ia-a efessings that t+aver-se shal:ed dr-ive aisles within the development shall be eonstfueted with br-iek,paver-s,stamped eoner-ete,or-colored coner-ete to elear4y delineate the dFiving s ff ee ftomr the—pedestrian fueilities,per-UDC T 2 A 1�b-. d. The Fequifed landscape street buffer-s and nwlti use pathway segment shall be eofist+tteted and vegeta+ed with the first phase of development along E. Ustiek and N. Eagle Road; the pFoposed 25 foot landseape b4fer- along the west a-ad 1.,,,,n,1afies shall be , nstf+tete .with the f:-st phase of development, e. Applicant shall wor-k with AGHD to constfuct a safe pedestfian or-ossing ftom the multi family y site area to the par-par-king lot along the west 1.,,,,n,1.,ry aer-oss TAT cefitfepoifit Way f-. The height of the buildings shall not exeeed the height shown on the elevations i 2. Conditional Use Per-mi-�.L 2.1 The Applioant shall eomply with all specific use standards for the proposed use o r idit�y Residential Development (UPC 11-4 3 2.2 The Applicant t shall obtain., Gei4 fie to of Zoning Compliance (r7r) .,n Administr-ative Design Review (DES) appFevals before submitting for-any btt4d4*g within this development. 2.3 At the time of Ge4if4eate of Zoning Complianee submittal,the Applieant shall sibmit a-. r-eeor-ded and legally binding doeument(s)that state the maintenance and Owflefship stl�bkEttlres,parking, eexnmon areas caic-other development featti c� 7 mcr UDG 1 1-T-3 2.4 Futur-e development shall be eonsistent with the minimttm dimensional standar-ds listed 2.5 09 street paFking is r-e"ir-ed to be pr-avided by the standards listed in UPC Table 11 2r 6 for-.,.,,lt; family dwellings based o the, mbe-of L.o,l,-.,ems P 2.6 The Appheant shall wor-kwith Vailey Regional Transit to eastife the tFansit stop sheltef being pfoposed is appr-apr-ia4e for-tha4 loea4ion and if they afewillifig to maintain oa z The Appheant shall eamply with all AGHD eenditions of approval. 2.8 2.9 The A,-.,-.1;,..,nt shall .ledie.,te Ayelye (12) foot of'right .,F....,..on Eagle Road to area.rwanstf:btet the right turn lane to Seville Lane. shall be stofed an the site unless pr-evided for-in a separate, designated and sefe 2.11 A total of eight (8) amenities shall be installed as proposed by the appheant. UDG 11 iA 5,,r�1- 6,and UDG 9 148, City of Meridian I Department Report III. City/Agency Comments &Conditions be submitted to the Planning T iyisio v i f .i gal !a .moo : ents are in 2.14 Fifteen(15) days prior-to the City Couneil hearing,the applieapA shall provide the r-&vised eoneept plan for-the el&vatioas, landseaping plan and open spaee exhib show the r-em&ved pafk4fig stalls a ions. Provide details for-the amenities.amenities.:tie •cs 2.15 The Conditional Use Permit approval shall beeome null andvoid tmiess other-wise approved the City if the fails to 1) eonynenee the use, satisfy the outlined i UDC vDC 11 5B ti�r71 obtain approval f^ time extension UPC; sly-6F� �7 2.16 The Director-has approved the Alter-native Complianee Request to r-emove the landseape island undemeath the eovered earperts per UDC B-9-. Usti ek Road. B. Meridian Public Works See public record(copy the link into a separate window) https://weblink.meridianciN.oLgzl ebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=356286&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X C. Meridian Fire Department A full fire plan review shall be completed prior to construction of the project. D. Meridian Park's Department See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=356286&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X E. Irrigation Districts 1. Nampa&Meridian Irrigation District See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancioy.orglWebLink/Browse.aspx?id=356286&dbid=0&repo=Meridia n ci F. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridiancit .00rg/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=356286&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X G. West Ada School District(WASD) or Other District/School See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridianciU.orglWebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=356286&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit X City of Meridian I Department Report III. City/Agency Comments &Conditions H. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https:llweblink.meridiancity.orz/WebLinkIBrowse.aspx?id=356286&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCit Y I. Idaho Transportation Department(ITD) See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) hggs://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=356286&dbid=0&repo=Meridian Cit Y IV. FINDINGS A. Alternative Compliance(UDC 11-513-5E) In order to grant approval for an alternative compliance application,the Director shall determine the following: l. Strict adherence or application of the requirements are not feasible; or As noted in Section III.D.3, the applicant is requesting alternative compliance due to a deficiency in the required amount of qualified open space, as detailed in the previous section. Commission finds that the applicant's request to increase the site density beyond the previously approved level has significantly reduced the amount of qualified open space. Adequate open space and amenities are essential for maintaining the vibrancy and functionality of a neighborhood.Adhering to the Comprehensive Plan is crucial to ensuring that developments contribute positively to the community and uphold the quality of life for residents. The applicant also requested alternative compliance for the removal of the parking lot islands under the covered parking for internal parking. The applicant states that despite the removal of these islands, the overall landscape buffer percentage will not decrease, as the buffer areas along the east side of Centrepoint Way exceed the city's code requirements.All uncovered parking areas will continue to comply with the requirements for parking lot islands. Commission finds the request feasible as the installation of solar carports, will serve as a green infrastructure amenity by providing an alternative power source for the development and its residents. 2. The alternative compliance provides an equal or superior means for meeting the requirements; and Based on the statement above for the qualified open space, staff finds the applicant did not meet this requirement. Based on the statement above for the removal of the landscape islands underneath the solar carports, staff finds the applicant met this requirement. 3. The alternative means will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. Commission finds that the proposed alternative means will not be materially detrimental to public welfare or impair the intended uses and character of surrounding properties. However, reducing the proposed density to the previously approved number of units would increase the available open space, thereby contributing positively to the community and enhancing the quality of life for residents within the development. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. Findings Staff finds the alternative compliance request for the removal of the landscape islands underneath the solar carports will not be materially detrimental to public welfare or impair the intended uses and character ofsurrounding properties. B. Conditional Use (UDC 11-513-6E) The commission shall base its determination on the conditional use permit request upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. Commission finds that as proposed, the design cannot meet the dimensional standards and development regulations without the approval of several alternative compliance request. However, stafffeels if the proposal adheres to the conditions of the staff report it would be a nice addition to the community. 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian comprehensive plan and in accord with the requirements of this title. Commission finds that if the site is built as recommended by staff and all conditions of approval are met, the proposed site design and use of multi family residential would be harmonious with the comprehensive plan designation of Mixed-Use Regional and the requirements of this title when included in the overall MU-R designated area. 3. That the design,construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. Commission finds that despite the proposed use being different from the residential uses to the west and south, the site design, construction, and proposed operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and should not adversely change the essential character of the same area. 4. That the proposed use,if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed,will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. Commission finds the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of approval for CUP H- 2022-0072 and MDA H-2022-0035, it will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools,parks,police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. Commission finds the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services because all services are readily available and both ACHD and ITD have reviewed and approved the proposed layout and traffic generation with conditions. 6. That the proposed use will not create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Commission finds all public facilities and services are readily available for the subject site so stafffinds that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community or create excessive additional costs for public facilities and services. Utilities have already been approved for this development with the previous application. 7. That the proposed use will not involve activities or processes,materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic,noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Commission finds that although traffic is sure to increase in the vicinity with the addition of more residential units, the addition of the multifamily as designed will be detrimental to any City of Meridian I Department Report IV. Findings persons,property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke,fumes, glare or odors. 8. That the proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature considered to be of major importance. Commission is unaware of any natural, scenic, or historic features within the development area, therefore, staff finds the proposed use should not result in damage to any such features. V. Multi-Family Development Analysis A. Multi-family Development(UDC11-4-3-2n Specific Use Standards: VI. ACTION A. Staff: aeeer-danee with Findings in Seetion Al. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on September 5,2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject Conditional Use Permit and Development Agreement modification requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearin&. a. In favor: Nicolette Womack, Chase Huber, Brandon McDougall,Nock Stoppello, Brenda Jones b. In opposition: Steve Grant,Kristy Hein,Landon Johnson,Janet Bailey,Jeffrey Miller, Barry Holsinger,Doug Stern,Jared Schofield,Abisay Uretta,Ruth Dickinson, Carrie Gammon,Jeff Vrba,Elizabeth Gammon c. Commenting: Steve Grant,Kristy Hein,Landon Johnson,Janet Bailey,Jeffrey Miller, Barry Holsinger, Doug Stern,Jared Schofield,Abisay Uretta,Ruth Dickinson, Carrie Gammon,Jeff Vrba,Elizabeth Gammon d. Written testimony: Bruce and Kathy Dickinson, Callie Meye,Jackson Square HOA, Joseph Lemay,Kathleen Medley,Michelle Hodges, and Randall Adams were all against the proposed development e. Staff presenting application: Linda Ritter f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) public testimony A. Density of the proposed project,height requested for the proposed buildings,traffic from the proposed project, cut through traffic on the private roads from the proposed development 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Density of the project,height of the proposed buildings and increased traffic in the area 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Denial of the project based on building height and density_ 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s) for City Council: a. None C. City Council: Action Pending. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Multi-Family Development Analysis � 1 t rti ct Location of Impact A 0 Analysis 7,' � J ' � �� 1• r 1 ,1' -� USTICKLU 7 r 41a III IIII II I Ilf 11fr Legend ■�rain C►iia Project Location AnalysisArea of Impact Ins ■atr urn wm- := _ as / af'-�`•■■■ 1111-r-A - ponmy � - _ rn :■111111 I�_ I;i efiiia■ � � `-i � m lunmu n uunm pan" 1111111 � uvl 'I'. I■ i �= ia�nuun �� I lil 111111111 J lui' I: - -:1:; Ir f11fu111nn II,u111 � � + :�:- Ip If■yY=■ IIIIIA111 Ili � 1 -�. I ■■ _. Illu�i = 'uuull ■ I���n ���` Innnm � ■��� a1a1n 1111 ��Cp f.�►a 1� iini:::^ • = IIInn11.■W-- nnl 11 . ! ' -will ulllpl:. i � a1. 11 Illfli■a■ti � 1 Ifaa rA11R ■ flffar�Illflll►��r r aalrlr Illi.0^s"^'1I11111i• �irlllll ■ry111111 ^ate/Nllu!■ yy 44I10F■I��auaquaR ■r\r i pia���,■a:611111 11 �III/1 (fayi. � � � - �a+dap r^^ noon r�unun■f a If■fA■nf■�■■�7fN � ������� o IIn1�rA1■JI,AAud�ina u Q �1��,` r ' 1 - LocationIII Legend LIII Project Are• • Impact An • a a''►,IyIR rr' .uiiniuuiiul _ �-tl..: ME MINIM SENSE W - ul+alb •••••■•••e - r.9:�ui'■�!- 1 a...f.■ r�:' Bill �■■r iiuiii � ■. .� . �}AiIlIlI.. US-T-ICIIIH ](III]!ra -.. ISHII- , �■nu.� � nnu unn_■ wun._ n unr olll■.e • * IIIIII�� n i, llli 1111111111.A�� 1:..n1■�::► � n niRrfnnlnuEi I� � .n�u1u411u., Af■..If � ..un■ �- rl IIIIII ri r°iail'�� UIIIIII 1._�-Ill � !I !i! � � h�ulu■�i�; j IIUI■nlul �, l.nlnn111:=_� �.� re +„, :__ Er �-rw �. ■ya If1111f11E11u11111.U111 1111 rlllll�111111'is ■iimiuuA l ; I u� u.J �„7 .anfn.aur� ► � i��=IP=-�Q'-.. •_ .r�me ■ ^ • MIN I Q .11■111' I9E1111, 1.1• ♦�i C■rEl■►� - raii/i�QI. 11111P1. • •■11 F - - -- '.1lllrl • - • • �■n (Fill :a:�� mull• ■■a�An■1ia171in - ="�lIIJ11 s. - `Ii■Au■■.uu■■■ gm■■lll#ll ' loll •�■w R... ,. _� IIIIIIIfI�';��. �tri;'w...:::::fir:::pIr••� liunur oho■ u..un.n pia ■,mill :r �` �b..� .rrrlrlr.rYp rr�...■.•-•! rr-►•��� -^�var" �1� ����� r�'G !►�''�' 1:::--.a::�i�� l�yy�0•%: !.■ III uu uuunAla'1►�uy m �a slur GI►/it � .� �n a rlpn■I Iil � (looms 1I Project L. . . III!III►.f� Ci.�.�jliunie•� .mom Area • City Limits Planned Parcels = -• • IIIIIU�Illgllll w•�f1,::-ter :, .....:.•' - ` iii•.� low 1►may �-.�r ...n■ iF��1=r i r�� a� nwl .ii� 11a"iy- C p' .mi .►�a-. � � loll +' (IIIIII e lRii 'Ilrri .11. (III IIIIII e� �nrlr.� ' IIIII IIIIII Sa ■ • "� Ilflll ri Inrl .■■� IIIIII z 1 j 1 1.r.nlu^r► � u mrr�r11111 i ,��� 1 nuulu iw■r■F Il11Nl{ � .nnu 1.��_Ill rl nll _� I:Illllllpll■1 iC7, lalnunr:= �, , IIIAA-__ Iri111�111n111111^ ee!!!!�l■nlu�nuielq; I • :�� ::� �`�11i■gy■o.-�•�J'��nro�Illri " �� '.,ru1h'S .�- nil•.+ .....ME m .r _f� h ' �•7n ■ �f V nA.ilvr- *�� `• O•� . Q .unr�:- _ �- 'agar ull 111 • :noon:� 111411 ::ai.a••.•i. J -R.Aw +:... ���: � ,:"IUFt w'.::::a.'Iiiiiiii[� mlh..ula�i.n uulu .!�R l� �`axu uir.-r-I�f�eaplw'l'i p.■nui■ iiiifllll.yq .11 �, "" .Il.,►�IIIIIIIIIIII ...� .■.:-�11► ,♦ � Q '�I��.IIII,� u al::rar.:r n.: Lm umuli■allow u. ►>1r�lruri/�I►/>� �� page nu,�, '�� 1L �u■nn#pnq�11.�.IIIIIIIIAIIIIIIIIII 1 l".`• ■ .G ...Noll w.. B. Subject Site Photos !1T. v O. 1h 7a p t�tay t o a a + 1► Y MR �Pftl r7- , '.� •'i ♦�'����- Ilrrr!-s lrrn.E. �izr�z �q.�,�.y M �- Ar WM I - 15, wow aft �... {yL i'- City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits b nor �} ...... .... . City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S"1'1D577077'"1 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 37 82nd Percentile Description Location In City Limits Epp Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains r 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yr floodplain or > 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time < 5 min. GREEN Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 1/2 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Either a Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkabifty Parkwithin 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within PREEN 1/4 mile walking City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Proposed Site Plan(date: 8/29/2024) 511E INFOPM4TION .® •-��LL UGEND FFFTM r ' I SITE PLAN-CENTREPOINT Eagle&Uadek Meridian,ID A g,ft 29,20299 9 1 9 Kimi NHarn H-2022-0072 Centrepoint Apartments CUP Approved Site Plan(date: 8/30/2022) g,E IrraaunaN �R-m -� ie yt _ _______ - L ' ..sa I¢p IFGENG Akk CONCEPT SITE PLAN-CENTREPOINT Eagle 6 Usti&Meridian,ID ague[ Mmky Mom City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits E. Landscape Plan(date: 7/18/2024) di gE o A,)— IT �T -MME. - + _._.. - I -DEVCO -CENTREPOINT HOUSING-PCONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Eagle&Uatick Meridian,ID July I8,2D29 Kimley»Horn TTT WI�INIINIINIINI�INII IIIIIf I _.� -- • _ I DEVCO-CENTREPOINT HOUSING-CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN RENDERING Eagle&Uu:kk Meridian,ID July 18,2824 Kimley,»Horn City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Qualified Open Space Exhibit(date: 8/29/2024) OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS Arum �� a .muwrturw .r�cluuwN . Wnreueuvcr.e e..;. uieen.r._ne -- s ' 1 � ,..,.a -- \ I arw�cwvaEuaircn.awow. e�s ---'-----'- i _ i � REquiaERE Ts fswti— moI '= �� M7I �— La „ DEVCO-CENTREPOINT HOUSING-SCHEMATIC OPEN SPACE PLAN Eagle&Uad.k Meridian,ID ANgua<29,2024 Kimley»Horn City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits 0 � GI � I:1 ■ : : ■ it ■ .: = .#� ■ � I:I ■ r : n � ■ a ■ M. 0 ■ j � ■ ■ 11 : : ■ ■ : ■ 11 IU a ■ 1 : 1 ■ i •.1 11 1m nm ■ a a =_: Nil 11 r. a F11 ■ 11 ■ �I fll EVC9 TE ILE ■ L■J __ i; �', _ F : F H a II li 1 r IN ■ al ■ i :, . , ■ Ill �W Ill. I � a ■ L a - m a i �I ; ■ :1 — - are ■ C © ■ 7 I i1 t ■ n ■ ul !,6 I ■ - ■BUILDINGS 1311132 ELEVATIONS Devco-CentFepoint Housing — Fir D ■ ® Li �j ■ -- ® -- ■ ■ I1 ■ I� ■ 1� 111 ® 1 ■ : ■ El Ill ^-I 1 01 I ■ [1 ■ - INN IS ❑■ ■ �11 :I 01 ■ ■ CI ■ a 1n GI 1■■■■ I■■■■ I ■I ■ e ■ i n 1n i ❑■ IYY 1��I� 1 ■ ! ■ -�1 IN I A m �BUILDINGS B11132 ELEVATIONS WITH COMMUNITY - DEVCO n n n _ ----- Fro _ IT, - - n1 _ n e li 1 s ® ® ■ BUILDING C ELEVATIONS Devro-Centrepoint Housing rvco B1 A 1�1 Rllll --------—----- — —_— _--_--- L[Fl. ----- - EASTNl FlEVATION ----�• FgRTIP�OIfTFi ELEVATION ----� AM BUILDING D ELEVATIONS Devao-Centrepoint Housing • • M Mlnn WIIDIMG X�GMT GGMPARNIOM —---—----—---—----—---- --- —___—____ - -- — LlD ` H Ll El — — PNEVIGU-APPNDVEG ELEV►TION XEIGXT r. PRGP03EG ELEVATI ON XEIGXT B1 1 1 we 62 a� (E"P3N S2-CENIREPOIlf�WAY Z➢E LESLIE DR -- - -- -- - -- -- -- 51-PI�RI W W LENTREPgIJr WAY Lf]Mn A.05 I BUILDING SECTIONS Devoo-Centrepoint Housing • • City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits