Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-10-08 Regular
City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, October 08, 2024 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilman Luke Cavener Councilwoman Liz Strader Mayor Robert E. Simison PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] Approved Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 1. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for District at Ten Mile (H-2023-0071) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located at the northwest corner of S. Ten Mile Rd. and I-84 2. Final Order for Vanguard Village No. 1 (FP-2024-0012) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located a 1/4 mile west of S. Ten Mile Rd. on the north side of I-84 3. Approval of Purchase Order 25-0019 to Western States Equipment Company for Generator Parallel Switchgear Upgrade for Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Power System Improvements for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $211,914.12 4. Approval of Sole Source for Omega Thermo Products for the Purchases of a Stainless-Steel Heated Hopper and Related Equipment and a Stainless-Steel Thermal Floor and Related Equipment 5. Approve Award for the Equipment Agreement to Kurita America for Well 24 Filter for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $861,150 and Authorize Procurement Manager to Sign Resulting Purchase Order for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $861,150 6. Approve award of bid and equipment contract to Advanced Electrical Technologies for the Tertiary Filtration Electrical Package 2 for MCC, PLC’s & Comm Panels for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $340,000.00 ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA \[Action Item\] PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics ACTION ITEMS 7. Public Hearing for The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 (H-2024-0042) by Kyle Prewett, Toll Brothers, located at 5449 W. Daphne Dr. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0042 A. Request: Vacation to vacate a one (1) foot portion of the permanent easement for public utilities, pressure irrigation, and lot drainage encumbering the subject lot for Lot 3, Block 5 of the Oaks North Subdivision No. 5. Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 8. Public Hearing for Bradshaw Corner Subdivsion (SHP-2024-0003) by Focus Engineering and Surveying, located at 735 W. Cherry Ln. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/SHP-2024-0003 A. Request: Short Plat consisting of two (2) building lots on 0.508 acre(s) of land in the R-4 zoning district. Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 9. Public Hearing for Apex Farr Subdivision (H-2024-0014) by Brighton Corporation, located at west side of S. Locust Grove Rd., north of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and east of S. Meridian Rd. Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0014 A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to remove the property annexed with South Meridian Arbor Ridge (H-2015-0019), Inst.#2016-007071 and portions of the property annexed with Shafer View Terrace (H-2020- 0117), Inst.#2021-102396 and Apex (H-2020-0066), Inst.#2020-178120 from the existing development agreements to include in a new agreement and update the overall conceptual development plan for the site and other provisions as applicable. B. Request: Rezone of 38.69 acres of land from the R-2 to the R-8 (0.76 acre), R-15 to C-C (6.66 acres), and R-4 to R-8 (31.27 acres) zoning districts. C. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 381 single family residential building lots, 6 commercial building lots and 60 common lots on 131.89 acres of land in the R-8, R-15 and C-C zoning districts. Motion to approve made by Councilwoman Strader, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader Voting Nay: Councilman Taylor 10. Public Hearing continued from September 17, 2024 for Blayden Subdivision (H- 2023-0043) by Bailey Engineering, located at the south side of W. Chinden Blvd. and west side of N. Black Cat Rd. Denied Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2023-0043 A. Request: Annexation of 38.58-acres of land with R-8 (5.90), R-15 (1.83- acres), R-40 (16.71-acres) and C-G (14.15-acres) zoning districts. B. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 312 dwelling units on 16.71-acres of land in the R-40 zoning district. C. Preliminary Plat consisting of 15 building lots, 7 common lots, 1 drive/parking lot and 3 other lots for future development on 35.29-acres of land in the R-8, R-15, R-40 and C-G zoning districts. Motion to deny made by Councilman Whitlock, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader ORDINANCES \[Action Item\] 11. Ordinance No. 24-2062: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-1-8, Concerning Preservation of Private Property Rights; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-1A-1, Concerning Adding New Definitions; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-2, Table 11-2A-2, Concerning Manufactured Homes Within a Residential District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-4, Table 11-2A-4, Concerning Dimensional Standards for the R-2 District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11- 2A-5, Table 11-2A-5, Concerning Dimensional Standards for the R-4 District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2B-2, Table 11-2B-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Commercial Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2C-2, Table 11-2C-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Industrial Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2D-2, Table 11-2D-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Traditional Neighborhood Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-3C-6, Table 11-3C-6, Concerning Dimensional Standards for Carports for Residential Use; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-9, Concerning Daycare Facilities; Adding Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-51, Concerning Food Truck Court Specific Use Standards; Adding Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-52, Concerning Food Truck Specific Use Standards; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-5A-6(D)(4), Concerning Proof of Posting; and Providing an effective date. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 12. Ordinance No. 24-2061: An Ordinance (Kilgore H-2023-0063) for rezone of a parcel of land located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Niday’s Second Addition, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Plats at page 594, Ada County records, situate in the northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” rezoning 0.34 acres of land from the R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) zoning district to the O-T (Old Town) zoning district in the Meridian City Code; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all applicable official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date. Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 10:10 PM Meridian City Council October 8, 2024. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 8, 2024, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Robert Simison, Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Bill Parsons, Sonya Allen, Linda Ritter, Nick Napoli, Berle Stokes, Kris Blume and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener X Mayor Robert E. Simison Simison: Council, we will call this meeting to order. For the record it is October 8th, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. We will begin tonight's regular City Council meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Simison: Next is the Pledge of Allegiance. If you would all, please, rise and join us in the Pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Simison: Okay. Next item up is -- no one signed up for community invocation; is that correct? ADOPTION OF AGENDA Simison: Okay. Then we will move on to the adoption of the agenda. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: It looks like we don't have any changes that are needed to the agenda. So, move that we adopt the agenda as published. Overton: Second. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 2 of 74 Simison: Have a motion and a second to adopt the agenda as published. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] 1. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for District at Ten Mile (H-2023- 0071) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located at the northwest corner of S. Ten Mile Rd. and 1-84 2. Final Order for Vanguard Village No. 1 (FP-2024-0012) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located a 1/4 mile west of S. Ten Mile Rd. on the north side of 1-84 3. Approval of Purchase Order 25-0019 to Western States Equipment Company for Generator Parallel Switchgear Upgrade for Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Power System Improvements for the Not- To-Exceed amount of$211,914.12 4. Approval of Sole Source for Omega Thermo Products for the Purchases of a Stainless-Steel Heated Hopper and Related Equipment and a Stainless-Steel Thermal Floor and Related Equipment 5. Approve Award for the Equipment Agreement to Kurita America for Well 24 Filter for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $861,150 and Authorize Procurement Manager to Sign Resulting Purchase Order for the Not-to-Exceed amount of $861,150 6. Approve award of bid and equipment contract to Advanced Electrical Technologies for the Tertiary Filtration Electrical Package 2 for MCC, PLC's & Comm Panels for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $340,000.00 Simison: Next up is the Consent Agenda. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I move that we approve the Consent Agenda. For the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest. Overton: Second. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 3 of 74 Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve the Consent Agenda. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the Consent Agenda is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ITEMS MOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA [Action Item] Simison: There were no items moved from the Consent Agenda. PUBLIC FORUM - Future Meeting Topics Simison: So, next up is public forum. Mr. Clerk, anybody sign up on that? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, nobody signed up tonight. ACTION ITEMS 7. Public Hearing for The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 (H-2024-0042) by Kyle Prewett, Toll Brothers, located at 5449 W. Daphne Dr. A. Request: Vacation to vacate a one (1) foot portion of the permanent easement for public utilities, pressure irrigation, and lot drainage encumbering the subject lot for Lot 3, Block 5 of the Oaks North Subdivision No. 5. Simison: Okay. Then we will move on to Action Items. First item up is Item 7, public hearing for The Oaks North Subdivision, No. 5, H-2024-0042. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Ritter: Good evening, Mayor and Council. I'm Linda Ritter. So, tonight we are here for The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 vacation. The property consists of .156 acres of land. It's zoned R-8 and it's located at 5449 West Daphne Drive. So, the applicant is requesting approval to vacate a one foot portion of a permanent easement for Public Utilities pressure irrigation and lot drainage, on the subject site. The before mentioned easements have been reestablished as a result of an approved property boundary adjustment as subsequent to the quitclaim deed, which formally established a new property boundary. The vacation of this portion of the easement will allow the home already constructed on the subject project to no longer be located in the subject easement. The lot originated when The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 final plat was recorded as Instrument No. 2021-042866 on March 16th, 2021. The lot was subsequently adjusted again as a result of the property boundary adjustment, which was approved on March 29th, 2024. There were no written testimonies for this application, so the applicant is here if you have any questions, but at this time I will take any questions that you may have. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 4 of 74 Simison: Thank you, Linda. Council, any questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to make any comments? Okay. The applicant is waiving. Mr. Clerk, this is a public hearing. Did anyone sign up to provide testimony on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, I did not grab the sheet back there because this went so fast. I will grab it off the table, but appreciate if you would ask. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present who would like to provide testimony on this item or anybody online who would like to provide testimony? If you are hear you can come forward at this time or online use the raise your hand feature. Not seeing anybody signed up, no one coming forward and no one raising their hand, does the applicant waive any final comments? Applicant waives. Council, your direction. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I move that we close the public hearing on Item 7. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 7. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: I view this as a -- sort of an administrative change based on our prior approvals. It's very straightforward. After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony I move to approve File No. H-2024-0042 as presented in the staff report for today's hearing date. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to approve Item 7. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 5 of 74 MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 8. Public Hearing for Bradshaw Corner Subdivsion (SHP-2024-0003) by Focus Engineering and Surveying, located at 735 W. Cherry Ln. A. Request: Short Plat consisting of two (2) building lots on 0.508 acre(s) of land in the R-4 zoning district. Simison: Next item up is Item 8, which is a public hearing for Bradshaw Corner Subdivision, SHP-2024-0003. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Napoli: Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council. So, the next item on the agenda is the Bradshaw Corner Subdivision. The applicant is requesting a short plat to subdivide an existing property into two building lots in an R-4 zoning district. The site consists of .508 acres of land, located at 735 West Cherry Lane. The proposed density of four units per acre is consistent with the density desired of three to eight units per acre in the medium density residential FLUM map. As shown on the screen the existing zoning is R-4. The FLUM designation is medium density residential. So, access is proposed via a common driveway off of Northwest 8th Street and there is an existing home proposed to stay on Lot 1 with a new garage currently in for permitting with the city and one accessory structure on the property that is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Both structures currently comply with setback standards in the UDC. However, the accessory structure cannot remain alone on Lot 2. The applicant shall apply for a new residential permit to construct a new home, convert part of the structure into a dwelling with adequate parking or remove -- or remove the structure from Lot 2 prior to the city engineer's signature. Staff is recommending approval with conditions and we have not received any public comments at this time and I will stand for questions. Simison: Thank you, Nick. Council, any questions for staff? Is the applicant here? Would you like to make any comments? The applicant is waiving. Unless Council has any comments for the applicant. Okay. Is there anybody signed up for this item? Johnson: There are names. Nobody marked they wanted to speak. Simison: Okay. Is there anybody present who would like to provide testimony on this item, either in the room or online? Seeing no one rushing up to the podium and/or raising their hand online, applicant waives any final comments. Applicant waives final comments. Council, your direction. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Real quick maybe a quick question for staff. On this I guess secondary structure that will need to come down, what's the timetable for that to have to be removed? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 6 of 74 Napoli: Mr. Mayor, President Cavener, so, yeah, no, as far as the timetable on that, if they get -- if they -- if they choose to remove it, which I believe the applicant is going to be building a new single family home on it, they just have not applied for it currently. It would just have to be removed prior to the city engineer's signature on the plat, which would really be the next steps in the process for them to actually record it is that city -- city engineer's signature, but, you know, as far as with that it will probably -- I would say it would take a little bit of time for us to get to that point. So, they have time to get an application in to either build that single family and as long as we have the application in progress with a plat that could be recorded. Cavener: Thank you. Simison: Thank you very much. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Happy to make a motion if there is no public testimony and it sounds like the applicant waives. I move that we close the public hearing on Item 8. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing on Item 8. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: What I like about this application is it's a nice example of a very small in-fill project and I think it's a nice fit here. It fits with the -- the zoning and the density that we had contemplated in our Comprehensive Plan. I think it makes good sense. So, with all that in mind, after considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File No. SHP-2024-0003 as presented in the staff report for today's hearing date. Overton: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Item 8. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 7 of 74 Simison: All ayes and the item is agreed to. Thank you and good luck. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 9. Public Hearing for Apex Farr Subdivision (H-2024-0014) by Brighton Corporation, located at west side of S. Locust Grove Rd., north of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and east of S. Meridian Rd. A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to remove the property annexed with South Meridian Arbor Ridge (H-2015-0019), Inst.#2016-007071 and portions of the property annexed with Shafer View Terrace (H-2020-0117), Inst.#2021-102396 and Apex (H-2020-0066), Inst.#2020-178120 from the existing development agreements to include in a new agreement and update the overall conceptual development plan for the site and other provisions as applicable. B. Request: Rezone of 38.69 acres of land from the R-2 to the R-8 (0.76 acre), R-15 to C-C (6.66 acres), and R-4 to R-8 (31 .27 acres) zoning districts. C. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 381 single family residential building lots, 6 commercial building lots and 60 common lots on 131.89 acres of land in the R-8, R-15 and C-C zoning districts. Simison: With that we will move on to Item 9, which is a public hearing for Apex Farr Subdivision, H-2024-0014. We will open this public hearing with staff comments. Allen: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The next applications before you tonight are a request for a development agreement modification, a rezone and a preliminary plat. This site consists of 131 .89 acres of land. It's zoned R-4, R-8 and R- 15 and is located on the west side of South Locust Grove Road, north of East Lake Hazel Road. The subject property, except for the R-2 zoned portion, was annexed in 2015 with an R-4 zoning district as part of the south Meridian Category A annexation, which included multiple properties and property owners. A placeholder R-4 zoning district was approved with individual development agreements for each property owner and that was Arbor Ridge; Brighton Investments, LLC; SCS Brighton, LLC, and Murgoitio Limited Partnership, which require modification prior to the development of the property to approve any proposed development plan. In 2020 a modification to the existing development agreement for Brighton Investments, LLC, SCS Brighton, LLC, and Murgoitio Limited Partnership was approved, which replaced those agreements with one new agreement for Apex. A rezone was approved for much of the subject property from the R-4 to the R-8 and R-15 districts. The Arbor Ridge, R-4 zoned property along the northern boundary, was under different ownership at that time and was not included in the rezone, but is part of the subject rezone application. A preliminary plat was also approved for Apex Northwest Subdivision, which included the Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 8 of 74 R-15 zoned portion of the subject property at the southeast corner. The conceptual master plan included in the development agreement depicts future development with no specific development plan for the areas not included in the preliminary plat with the general street layout on the land southwest of the Williams gas pipeline and a future school at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Crescendo. In 2021 the R-2 zoned portion of the property was annexed with a development agreement and included as a lot in Shafer View Terrace Subdivision. This lot was depicted as a future phase with no specific development plan. A preliminary plat was approved in 2021 for Apex West Subdivision, which included the lot in Shafer View Terrace Subdivision and a portion of the subject property. A portion of this property is included in the subject preliminary plan. The remainder will be part of the Apex West Subdivision. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designations for this property are low density residential, medium density residential and mixed-use community with a future school designation. The applicant is requesting a modification to the development agreement to include the south Meridian Arbor Ridge property and portions of the property annexed with Shafer View Terrace and Apex in a new development agreement with an updated conceptual development plan as shown. These properties will no longer be subject to the previous development agreements. The proposed development plan is generally consistent with the future land use map. The future school previously planned at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Crescendo was shifted to the south side of Lake Hazel east of Locust Grove. A rezone of a total of 38.69 acres of land from the R-2 to R-8, R-15 and R-4 -- excuse me. Let me back up on that. A rezone of a total of 38.69 acres of land from the R-2 to R-8 and that consisted of .76 of an acre, R-15 to C-C, which consisted of 6.66 acres and R-4 to R-8, which consisted of 31.27 acres is proposed. The area proposed to be rezoned to R-8 is designated medium density residential on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, except for a .76 acre portion, which is designated low density residential. The area proposed to be zoned C-C is designated mixed-use community. The proposed zoning is consistent with the associated future land use map designations. A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 381 single family residential building lots, six commercial building lots, and 60 common lots on 131.89 acres of land in the R-8, R-15 and C-C zoning districts and is a resubdivision of a portion of Shafer View Terrace Subdivision. The remainder of which will be included in the Apex West final plat. The plat is proposed to develop in seven final plat phases as shown on the phasing plan on the right. The minimum lot size proposed is 4,180 square feet with an average lot size of 8,021 square feet. A gross density of 2.84 units per acre with a net density of 5.43 units per acre is proposed, which is consistent with the density desired in the medium density residential future land use designation. A mix of front loaded and alley loaded single family residential units in a variety of different lot sizes are proposed with larger lots along the northern boundary to provide a transition to the rural lots to the north of the Farr Lateral. Access is proposed via the extension of East Quartz Creek Street and East Trenton Street at the project's west boundary and from South Locust Grove Road via South Apex Way and East Crescendo Street. An emergency access is proposed at the north boundary via South Margaret Avenue. Several common driveways are proposed as depicted on the plat. The driveway in Block 12 exceeds the maximum number of units on one side of the driveway, which will either require removal of one lot or an application for alternative compliance to this Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 9 of 74 standard. Stub streets are proposed for future extension and interconnectivity with adjacent and future development in Apex Pinnacle. A collector street is stubbed to the north, which will extend to East Amity Road with future development and South Apex Way will extend to South Locust Grove Road as a collector street in accord with the master street map. Cross-access, ingress-egress easement should be provided between all of the commercial lots. Private streets are planned for access to the rear loaded homes in Blocks 2 and 23 because ACHD won't allow these streets to be public alleys due to some of these lots not having frontage on a public street. Staff is concerned the provision of private streets in these blocks will create addressing issues for the units having frontage on two named streets, which will likely create confusion and delays for emergency responders. Therefore, staff recommends Block 2 is reconfigured so that public alleys may be allowed and addressing can be from the adjacent public street. If Council does not support this recommendation staff alternately recommends the lots not fronting on a public street are addressed from the adjacent public street with directional signage provided at the public street and private streets are not provided. Block 23 at the southeast corner of the development consists of rear loaded single family residential units on the west side and commercial uses on the east side. The UDC requires a minimum 25 foot wide densely landscaped buffer to residential uses on the C-C zoned property. The applicant is requesting Council approval of no buffer on the C-C property with the provision of a 15 foot wide common MEW lot on the residential portion, which will include landscaping and a sidewalk. An additional ten feet of landscaping is proposed in the front yard setback area of each residential lot, which totals 25 feet between the front of the houses and the commercial property line. If Council is amenable to the applicant's request staff recommends the common area MEW is increased to a minimum width of 20 feet consistent with the linear open space standards and includes landscaping in accord with the standards for buffers to adjoining uses. Although Block 23 is in the mixed-use community designated area and a mix of uses are anticipated in this area, staff is not supportive of the proposed layout with the residential units fronting on the parking lot for the commercial area with only a 15 foot wide common area in between and no berm or wall as a buffer to shield the homes from vehicle headlights in the parking area. In accord with the mixed-use and mixed-use community concept diagrams in the concept plan as shown, staff originally recommended a north-south public street be provided between the residential and the commercial lots for addressing purposes for the east facing residential units, which is an issue with their proposed layout similar to that in Block 2 and the access drives for the residential units be constructed as alleys instead of named private streets as shown in the recommended layout on the right. This would provide an on-street parking area for guests and a transition and separation between land uses. Because this solution doesn't meet ACHD's offset requirements for access points to a collector street, staff is recommending the residential lots and uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses and zoned C-C. This is the existing layout on the left. This was staff's recommended layout, but as I mentioned ACHD will not allow this layout with the public street due to offset requirements. There are several site constraints that affect the design and layout of this project as follows: The Carlson Lateral runs along the northwest boundary of the site. The Farr Lateral runs along the northeast boundary of the site at the highest elevation of the project. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 10 of 74 The McBirney Lateral will be piped and is located in the southeast portion of the project. The Watkins Drain runs through the northwest quadrant. The Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline bisects the site within a 75 foot wide easement. There is an existing sewer trunk line on the northwest corner of the property in a 25 foot wide easement and there are slopes between seven and 12 percent along the northeast boundary of the site within the area shown in red on the map. Due to these constraints the applicant requests a waiver from Council to the maximum block face length standard of 750 feet without an intersecting street or alley. Block faces are allowed to extend up to one thousand feet where a pedestrian connection is proposed between streets within the block. The face of Block 12 along West Precipice Drive is approximately 2,500 feet. There are two pedestrian connections proposed within the block that provide pedestrian access between the streets. The Farr Lateral runs along the north side of the street at the highest point of the development. The face of Block 12 along West Vertex Drive is approximately 1,500 feet in length. The one pedestrian connection is proposed within the block that provides pedestrian access between streets. Traffic calming is proposed in the form of a 29 foot wide street section for West Precipice Drive along the Farr Lateral which will only allow parking on one side of the street and bulb outs and choke points at pedestrian crossings as shown. A landscape plan was submitted with a preliminary plan that depicts street buffer and common open space landscaping for the development. This fencing plan was also submitted as shown on the right. Multi-use pathways are proposed within the Williams Pipeline easement and along Locust Grove Road. A minimum of 15 percent or 18.93 acres based on 126.2 acres of residential area. Qualified open space is required to be provided in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts. A total of 36.1 acres or 29.1 percent is proposed at almost double the required amount. Site amenities totaling a minimum of 26 points from each category are required to be provided. Amenities totaling 30 points are proposed consisting of two fitness courts, a dog park and two education gardens from the quality of life category. A swimming pool with changing facilities and restrooms and two tot lots and natural play areas from the recreational activity category. .37 mile of pathway aligned with linear open space and 1.61 miles of multi-use pathways from the pedestrian or bicycle circulation system category and a bicycle repair station from the multi-modal category. Several conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed single family residential detached homes in the development as shown. There are some single family attached units proposed in Block 23, but no concept elevations were submitted for those. A mix of single story and two-story homes are proposed that include a variety of siding styles with masonry accents in a variety of colors and design elements and features with varying roof profiles and wall modulation that demonstrate the high quality of development proposed. No elevations were submitted for the commercial portion of the development. The Commission recommended approval with the provisions recommended by staff and changes requested by the applicant and agreed upon by staff as noted in Section 4 of the staff report. I will just go over a summary of the Commission public hearing. Amanda McNutt and Jon Wardle, Brighton Corporation, the applicant's representative, testified in favor of the application. Julie Edwards and Melissa Fulkerson commented on the application. Written testimony was received from the applicant Amanda McNutt in response to the staff report. Key issues of discussion were the request from the neighbors on Mary Lane for trees to be provided within the Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 11 of 74 buffer along the south side of the Farr Lateral from approximately Locust Grove Road to Margaret Lane for screening purposes. The applicant is amenable to providing trees in this location provided there is adequate area to do so outside of the Farr Lateral easement or through a license agreement with the irrigation district. Opinion of people living in the residential units facing the commercial development in Block 23 would not want to look out their front windows into a parking lot. Key issues of discussion by the Commission were as follows: The requested waiver to block face standards in regard to both phases of Block 12 and the associated site constraints. The requested reduction of the buffer to residential uses on the commercial property in Block 23 and proposed design with the parking lot for the commercial uses abutting the residential property -- generally not in favor of the proposed design and concern pertaining to addressing for the lots that have frontage on a public street that are accessed off of a named private street and confusion that may occur for emergency responders. The Commission made the following changes to the staff recommendation. At the recommendation of staff the Commission approved the applicant's request to remove the requirement for ten foot wide detached sidewalks to be provided along all collector streets in lieu of on-street bicycle lanes consistent with the five foot wide sidewalks constructed in the adjoining Apex development. Only five foot wide detached sidewalks are required by the UDC. Modification to the condition requiring a revised landscape plan to be submitted to add that it shall be required with submittal of the final plat application and modification to the condition requiring alternative compliance to the common driveway standards to allow four lots on one side of the driveway in Block 12 to be submitted with the final plat application if -- if that is requested. The outstanding issues for City Council tonight. The applicant requests Council approval of the following: Deletion of the requirement for a north-south public street to be provided between the residential and the commercial lots in Block 23. As I mentioned this is not allowed by ACHD due to the offset requirements and they did state to me that there -- there would be no waiver of policy on that matter. Deletion of the requirement for the revision to the tot layout -- lot layout, excuse me, in Lot 2 to comply with ACHD's requirements for public alleys, which was required so that the lots only have frontage on one named street rather than two. Deletion of the requirements for a sidewalk to be provided on the north side of West Precipice Drive. This is a UDC standard that cannot be waived. A waiver to exceed the maximum block face allowed in Block 12 along West Precipice Drive and West Vertex Drive due to the previously noted -- noted site constraints and a waiver to not provide a 25 foot wide buffer to the C-C district -- in the C-C district on Lots 1, 5 and 6, Block 23, to the abutting residential uses along the west boundary with the provision of a 15 foot wide common area MEW on the residential property, which will include landscaping and a sidewalk. As an alternative staff recommends residential lots and uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses. If Council does not feel the residential lots and uses should be removed and is supportive of the applicant's request for no buffer on the C-C zoned property, staff recommends the common area MEW is widened from 15 feet to 20 feet consistent with the minimum width for linear open space areas. Written testimony since the Commission hearing. A memo was received from Jon Wardle, Brighton Corporation, the applicant, in response to the recommendation to Council, which includes an exhibit that illustrates the proposed design of the buffer between the residential and commercial uses in Block 23 Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 12 of 74 and an exhibit that shows the proposed layout of Block 23 is consistent with the concept diagram in the comp plan for the mixed-use neighborhood designation. Staff would like to clarify as noted by the applicant -- this property is within the mixed-use community, not the mixed-use neighborhood designation, which allows more intense commercial uses and necessitates more of a transition and separation between land uses. The mixed-use and mixed-use community concept diagrams and -- the concept -- or in the comp plan as shown before you hear depict a local or collector road as a transition and separation between single family residential homes and higher density residential and commercial uses. The concept diagram for the mixed-use neighborhood designation transitions from single family residential to higher density residential and then commercial uses. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you, Sonya. Council, questions for staff? Okay. Wardle: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Council Members. My name is Jon Wardle. My address is 2929 West Navigator Drive, Meridian, Idaho. 83642. Happy to be here with you this evening. I know that everybody has commitments, especially with the new school year and so I do appreciate you taking the time to let us talk about Apex Farr tonight. I know that some of you wouldn't say are new, but this project does have a little bit of history to it. We started back in 2020 as mentioned by -- by Sonya and originally the property was brought in as a holding zone. The city did a large annexation in south Meridian so that an investment in sewer could occur and everything was brought in as an R-4 designation with the opportunity to bring forward rezones and preliminary plats in the future. In 2020 when we brought the project in front of Council these were just fields and we made some statements that we were going to do a few things. One was improve roads. Another one was to build schools. And a third one was to connect with parks. And one -- another one dropped kind of in front of us, which we had mentioned kind of offhand, like wouldn't it be great if we had a library and so I just wanted to highlight some of the things that have happened that we have been involved in since the project started. We have built a mile and a half -- a half a mile of Locust Grove and the two lane roundabout. We finished another quarter mile of Locust Grove going over towards recreation where the new fire station is and allowed phase two of the park to get built. We are currently building -- almost done -- Locust -- or Lake Hazel out to Meridian Road, which will complete a five Lane road section of 1 .34 miles. We were able to work with Gem Prep, get them a school site and they actually were able to open their school before really residents had moved into our neighborhood and, finally, the Meridian Library opened up just -- just last week and that was an interesting process that we were able to help them meet their goals of their -- their constituents as well. And the last thing we talked about when we did the original approval was an amphitheater and we have broken ground on the amphitheater and that should be complete in May of 2025 and so there has been a little bit of history here, but we have also been able to accomplish the things that we wanted to do with -- with Pinnacle. We often refer to it as -- as Apex. There is a reason for that, but -- so, things get interchanged at the same project and so I will say Apex or Pinnacle tonight. Before you -- I thought I could move this. As Sonya mentioned we are talking about 131 acres and a new preliminary plat for 381 homes, six commercial lots and 60 common area lots Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 13 of 74 and the overall project will have 28.7 percent qualified open space. This is specific of what we are talking about. The area that's shaded in blue was previously approved under Apex West and we have other phases that will also come through and that will come through in the future and this is the area that is directly south of the Farr Lateral and west of Locust Grove. As Sonya mentioned there are a few cleanups in terms of rezones that are happening here. All this property was previously brought in and annexed, but we are doing a little bit of cleanup so it's consistent with the plot that's in front of you. We do have some constraints. As Sonya mentioned one of the things that's probably most interesting is how much topography is on the site. On the north the Farr Lateral sits very high. The Williams pipeline is kind of low through the valley and, then, we come back up towards where the Watkins is. So, this Watkins is here, this blue line kind of cutting through the middle. You have the Farr in the north. The orange is the Williams pipeline and we also have sewer lines that are existing. We have the Watkins Drain and so there were a lot of constraints and probably the most challenging on all of this was topography of the site and so these are things that we have designed around as we have brought this before you. One of the things that's really interesting here are the opportunities afforded by constraints that we can do something that's unique with them. There is -- there could be a chance to turn our back on the -- on the Williams pipeline, which is 75 feet, but I think the city did a very good job of embracing the pipeline in Discovery Park. You wouldn't know that it's there. It goes through Gem Prep as well. We have it coming through our site. In fact, I will mention that a little bit more when we get to the Block 23. But what we are really trying do is make that an essential amenity, not only for the residents, but we are putting in the -- the city -- city pathway system that allows that to get down to Discovery Park through ten foot sidewalks on both sides of Locust Grove and Lake Hazel and eventually go towards the north. So, you can see that this cuts through the project. One of the things that's really unique by having that is you can see on this one there is blue lines and red lines. The blue lines are the -- the hard surface pathway, a ten foot concrete pathway, but the five feet are natural passive pathways that give a different experience, which allows us, then, to create some gardens for flowers and other things like that. There will be groomed areas, but there will also be some very natural areas as you work through this corridor. In all I think we have about -- in this Apex Farr about 1.4 miles of pathways that qualify as ten feet or more. We also will have a new community pool. I'm going to come back up here really quick. We actually are building right now in Apex West our second community pool and our third community pool will be in this phase Apex Farr, which is up here on the corner. So, we will have a community pool and clubhouse, outdoor gym, dog park, and even a bike repair station with all the pathways that we have and the phasing plan. There are just a few issues that Sonya noted, but we feel like we do need to spend a little time on regarding road length, sidewalk and the mixed- use nature of Block 23. Like I said, there are some constraints. When you look at the Farr Lateral and the roadway that we have up above the Precipice is what it's called, and, then, there is a roadway down below, which is called Vertex, the distance in height is anywhere from 19 to 24 feet between those two roads and that's -- that's significant when you are talking about this and so we looked at the several different ways on how we could make these roadways work, but also with that much elevation you can't make connections very easily, because they exceed the height or the -- how steep they could Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 14 of 74 be between those two roads and so in order to accommodate that we have addressed it through traffic calming, pathway systems and other things like that. Related to Precipice, which is the northern road along the Farr Lateral, we have a number of places where these sections of road are really broken up, so they are not long lengths and we will have bulb outs and other things -- connections that are happening. We do have one section that's over a thousand feet, but we have pathway connections connecting between Vertex and Precipice, traffic calming throughout that. A 29 foot street. I believe we have about 26 or 27 lots along Precipice total. It's not a through street, it's not a collector, it is really just a local street for those residents and it's designed that way so that it can accommodate them, but not really as a cut through. The other one is Vertex. While we do exceed the block face you can see that there are a number of roads that are coming through and so, yes, on one side of it the block face is fairly long, but we have intersecting roads that come into that and they also come down and connect to the pathway system along the Williams pipeline. We have reviewed these with ACHD and they have been agreeable with the Precipice roadway as a 29 foot roadway and the separation of these as well as the length of those. We are asking Council to accommodate a request for the waiver, because, frankly, there is just not another way to do it without very steep slopes and embankments that would come from north to south. The sidewalk that was talked about just a second ago is really just a sidewalk on the -- what we call the south side of Precipice identified here in blue. There is also pathway connections coming through. It's a 29 foot road. We do have the sidewalk on the one side and we are asking for your consideration of that request as well. One of the things that we are able to do as a request by the neighbors to the north, the Farr Lateral, which are on still county lots, but they are larger lots -- was could we add trees. We went back and looked at the easement area. It looks like we can accommodate trees on the north side. We don't want to cut into that with a sidewalk because we don't -- the -- The Farr Lateral is higher than that road, so we don't really want to rip into that, but we can plant trees and that we will be outside of their easement as well and that's what's demonstrated here and probably the item that Sonya spent the most time on was Block 23. We -- we have talked about this a lot. You can see in the middle of Block 23 we are bisected again by the Williams pipeline. We have looked at the uses here. The uses that we are anticipating in Block 23 from a nonresidential perspective, are a church, a gym and daycare. All the uses that are very easy, very light in nature. We do not feel like they will overload at all, but they do provide some nice mix of uses here. This is not the hard corner. The hard corner is still to the -- to the south and there are intense uses that could happen down there, but we don't see the commercial nature of this one and, true, while Sonya did notes accurately that when you look at the Comprehensive Plan, this is designated as a mixed-use community. We never viewed this as a mixed-use community block and we really -- and she did note it in the -- the last of her presentation was that we had really designed it based off of what the mixed-use neighborhood designation was where you would have residential and -- this is in Figure 3D of your comprehensive plan. You would have commercial uses and you would have parking. We are pretty similar to that where the parking is right up against the residential uses. It's not a drive. It's not a through lane going through here. That's this internal circulation and we feel like this does work. We -- we have had experience with this. We know that maybe not everybody -- it's a choice that they would Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 15 of 74 want, but we do need to look at opportunities to be creative and look at good design and consider the mixed-use neighborhoods that the city wants. This is a really good opportunity where we have the library just to the south, the new amphitheater and other things right there. It makes a really good combination of uses in Block 23. There were some questions about setbacks. More specifically buffers. It is true that in the -- between uses that the city does have a standard that there be a 25 foot landscape buffer. I would say oftentimes you have two different developers coming in, you have one developer who wants to do the commercial and you have existing residential or a new residential with existing commercial. We are able to marry both of those together. We do have a 25 foot buffer, but it does vary. We are in a 15 foot common lot, which is shown here in this 15 feet here and, then, there is ten foot from back of sidewalk to the face of these homes. There is a private little yard, but there is also in the side of their homes -- each of these homes would have a yard. There is a 20 foot driveway in the back and a two car garage. So, we have been thoughtful in the way that we are designing these. These are two homes connected. So, duplex style. This gives you another visual of how that works and so while the request is a little different where you would say we would want the 25 foot buffer on the commercial side, we are coming in to you with a complete plan. We would be the ones that are building this. We would also build the commercial. We can set the tone for this and we are accommodating and meeting the requirement for a 25 foot buffer with a 15 foot common lot and a MEW and a ten foot set back from there and we still meet the requirements. We can enhance the landscaping behind the sidewalk. I think there is some ways that we could add some plantings, whether it be a boxwood or tall grasses that would shield perhaps some car lights. But, again, when you consider the uses, they are really daytime uses or weekend uses and not a nuisance in terms of the evening. Just another look at how this would or could work. The comment was made in an e-mail back and forth between us and staff about, you know, life safety and concerns about how this might function practically. We have already done this in Meridian. We have a number of projects where the homes don't necessarily front on either a public road or a private road, but the fire code does allow for signage. And this is just one example that we have done in Bainbridge. You have the same examples in Paramount where you have these courtyards, there is a series of homes that are around a grassy area and they do not necessarily front their front door on the road, but working with the fire department and we came up with a way to address this. This is just one location, but in this particular location there are three different signs that show what the addresses are. Are there opportunities to enhance that and improve it? Absolutely. And we welcome that. But this is not a new concept the way that we are asking for these homes to front here -- they very easily can be signed off of the road to the north, which is Crescendo, or the road to the south which is Phenomenal in a way that would provide certainty on how life safety could get there, plus we also have the parking lot which would allow access directly into those. So, in conclusion we do concur with the staff report. We appreciate the time that they spent on it. There are just a few little items that we are asking for your consideration as you move to act on the preliminary plat, the rezone and development agreement. We ask that the block lengths be allowed to exceed the face, that we are allowed to do sidewalk on one side and the mixed-use layout as we have shown be allowed. We feel confident in our ability to deliver a very livable opportunity in Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 16 of 74 this -- in Pinnacle for a mixed-use community and neighborhood and here is one example where we can do that. So, I would stand for any questions you might have. Simison: Thank you, Jon. Council, any questions for the applicant? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Jon, real quick. When you showed a -- kind of an example of the parking and the 25 foot buffer on Block 23 in front of the residential, is -- that one right there. Can you go back to the -- the real world example of what the parking lots going to be laid out for in this Block 23? Is there going to be -- what -- what am I seeing? Wardle: Here? Overton: Right up against the residential where that 25 foot buffer would start. Is that going to be parking parallel to that curve or is that a not side parking area? Wardle: It would. So, there would be a back of curb. So, if you look at this exhibit here, Mr. Mayor, Council Member Overton, the parking lot would come up to the -- to the 15 foot common lot. So, that way back a curb. Then we would have a landscape area, the sidewalk within 15 feet and, then, outside of that we would have another ten foot setback to the front of the home. So, total of 25 feet, but 15 feet of that would be in the common area going right up to the back of -- back of curb in that parking lot area. Overton: Mr. Mayor, quick follow up. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: So, this is fairly accurate on what you are looking at, which is parallel parking coming up to the front of that picture. Wardle: Yes. It would -- perpendicular parking. Overton: Perpendicular parking. Wardle: Yes, that would be fairly accurate. Here is another look at it as well where these -- these cars could perpendicularly park in front of that -- that common lot. Overton: Mr. Mayor, one more. Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Just to cover on Precipice, I mean, obviously, the -- the length of the road -- completely understand based on what you are dealing with with elevations. Walk me Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 17 of 74 through one more time. This sidewalk will only be on the south side of Precipice, so what am I looking at on the north side of the road? Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Overton, I'm going to show you two slides here really quickly. So, this -- the blue line here on this exhibit shows where the sidewalk would be. If we go to the -- if I go to the next slide this would be on the north side of Precipice. So, we would have a curb and, then, we would start sloping up to the Farr Lateral, which would all be landscaped anywhere from 28 to 35 feet of landscaping up to their required access and so we can plant trees in that 28 feet, but there wouldn't be a sidewalk on the north side. So, this would be -- if you are looking due west -- if you are on Precipice looking due west in this picture on the right-hand side there would be a curb and, then, you would have landscaping going up to the Farr Lateral. Overton: Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: We always get into this discussion about laterals and different irrigation and I always forget which is which. How deep is the Farr Lateral and will there be fencing? What is contemplated on that north side? And just in general for all of the water in your development. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Strader, in the case of Farr Lateral we are not altering it at all. It's outside of -- we -- we don't have to do any crossings of it. So, we can landscape up to their maintenance area, but this is Bureau of Reclamation. They are pretty particular about what they will and won't allow in there. Could we do an open metal fence along that boundary kind of where -- at the 28 foot mark? We could. I don't believe that we were anticipating doing that, but if that was something that the Council felt strongly about and that would be something we could consider along the Farr Lateral. There are other ones like the Watkins, although it's not in this project. We have the Watkins, which was approved in Apex West. It was a water feature. It was fairly low and a pathway along it. No fencing required. This one's not a very deep lateral. It actually takes -- it comes off what is the -- the Farr, which is coming over from Lake Hazel, but in this particular section it's not very deep. But we are not intending to make any alterations within the Bureau of Reclamation's control facility. Strader: Uh-huh. Yeah. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: If you don't mind I have a couple questions. Okay. I -- yeah. I -- I don't know, I get concerned about safety. If you could maybe during this meeting kind of check into the depth of the lateral or just give some more color on what -- what the slope is or just Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 18 of 74 help us understand that. My inclination usually says to require a fence, but would love to hear more. If you could go to the aerial -- oh. Wardle: I -- we did have a few different examples here and so you have to humor engineers the way that they use their scales, because it will -- going up and down it looks really significant and it is, but side to side is -- is pretty standard in terms of -- so, we are talking about five feet north to south or up and down this, but a very significant distance. I think we are at 50 foot increments in between. But you can see that we would be trying to do a two-to-one maximum slope coming back from Precipice up to the -- the required access that they have. So, that's what we would generally be holding along that entire length of the Farr Lateral. So, this is just a couple -- we did three different sections here along there. When we get a little bit farther to the east it flattens out a little bit, so it won't be as steep, but we could have some slopes as much as two to one. Strader: Yeah. And -- and what I was trying to understand was more like the lateral itself, like the -- how -- how deep is it? How much water -- is it like two feet of water or one foot of water? Give me an idea. I know it's seasonal, too, so -- Wardle: Yeah. Let me see if I can get you an answer during the meeting here. Strader: That's very helpful. Thank you. And, then, if you could go to the aerial view -- the aerial view of Block 23. Wardle: That one or do you -- Strader: Yeah. That one's okay. Help me understand -- so, I was trying to understand -- what is the structure right in front of -- Wardle: Right down here? Strader: Yeah. Wardle: Let me move my -- Strader: Or just right before -- so, you have these duplexes, I think; right? And, then, you -- and, then, like right below that there is some -- something -- it's like a building or a parking lot. I'm not sure what that is. Wardle: They would also be townhomes or a live-work unit that would be facing towards the amphitheater. Strader: Uh-huh. Wardle: That is a use that is allowed in R-15, but we would have to bring that back through for alternate -- not alternative compliance, but for design review. But that's what Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 19 of 74 those are. There would be six attached townhomes there that we would hope that we could do as a -- either live-work or maybe even -- I'm not sure if we can do vertically integrated in R-15, but the idea would be at a minimum to do a live-work in those units. With all that that's shown in red would all be residential in nature. Strader: Yeah. I want to be honest, I'm struggling a little bit. I'm struggling a little bit with kind of a lack of more of a buffer between the commercial component and the residential component. It's interesting, I think if it -- what's interesting to me is I think if it was like live-work units that I thought were more commercially oriented and kind of a combination of commercial and residential I might actually be a little more comfortable, if that was like the product that I think was -- was facing the parking lot, then, I feel like that's a little more what people signed up for, if that makes sense, because, you know, you are kind of working out of your house and -- and you are combining those two uses together. I'm going to keep thinking about it during the meeting, but I just kind of wanted to flag that for you. Yeah. I mean unsurprisingly, but I am kind of struggling -- I am a little bit struggling with having these two uses, right, up against each other and what I sort of see is a lack of a buffer and like I don't love the idea of people looking at a parking lot either. I also don't love the -- the addressing challenges and kind of -- kind of want to understand that a little bit better how you do that. So, yeah, just thinking out loud. Simison: Since we are right here just maybe -- I know we have a very similar situation to this one mile away in Reflection Ridge. When you come in off of the main road -- Wrightwood the -- the -- all the -- all the units take their address -- there is basically a drive aisle that connects Wrightwood to another street and they are all -- they are all addressed off of Wrightwood, though. None of them have Wrightwood front -- Wrightwood frontage. So, I don't know if the standards have changed, but we have a you know, not just Cadence, but other residential area within a mile away that has similar types of addressing elements. So, have standards changed to your knowledge on this issue? Is that a -- you had referenced the fire department. The -- placing the sign there and that's what I recall when I drive down Wrightwood it lists the numbers of the units that are on those shared drive -- it's got to be a shared driveway. It's not even a private road. They are just a shared driveway and I don't know if there is four or six homes in between there, but any thoughts on -- has this been a changed standard? Wardle: Mr. Mayor, to my knowledge there has not been a changed standard. I believe that the -- that these have been allowed. There are examples in the city and we have done them as recently -- actually in this right here. This example right here. We have -- there is a block here. See if I can just highlight it really quickly. That block right there. You can see the -- this green space right there. None of those homes front on the public street. All of these homes in here -- that group right there all addressed off of Apex. So, it does come to us as a little bit of a surprise that there has been some resistance to this when we have done it in this project, when we have done it in our Cadence projects, that there are opportunities for really good design. If we aren't going to allow homes to open up in these different examples we are going to be pretty narrow in what we can design or consider creative. Keep in mind we aren't doing this without a Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 20 of 74 fair amount of investment. We were very comfortable with this. We designed this in mind of what we can do here. We feel in particular in this case with the -- the other uses that would be part of Block 23, that this is a good opportunity to have integrated mixed uses. We feel like it would be really unfortunate just to throw them out and say, no, it doesn't really work for us, when, in fact, there are different examples -- and, I -- will -- are you -- I will be candid, this was mixed-use neighborhood in your comp plan. We are in mixed-use community, but the nature of this Block 23 is neighborhood in nature. The city contemplated this design. The addressing -- there are provisions on way -- how to make the addressing works through fire code, which we have done. So, it's not without precedence and we also feel like it is -- it will be very desirable and these homes will give another opportunity for maybe a smaller lot, but less maintenance in -- in a very desirable community. I know that Chief Blume raised his hand, because he probably wants to weigh in and I was also going to ask Captain to -- because what I don't know is -- you know, I -- I -- all I know is when you put in Google, Google shows you where it is. I don't know how our emergency responders respond to -- you put in an address, how -- how is it showing you to get there? Is -- you know. And maybe I don't know if -- Chief Blume if you want to go first, since you raised your hand like a good boy. Blume: Well, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, yeah, I have had some pretty at length discussions with our prevention team and in understanding what the code does allow, it does allow for what the applicant is requesting with the modification of a monument or a sign indicating the addresses which are not visible from a street and so from that perspective and from the allowance that is provided in the fire code, the fire department does not have any issue with the applicant's request at this time. Simison: Thank you, Chief. Captain Stokes. Stokes: Yeah. Mayor, our CAD system, you know, maps the address for us, so the officers use CAD, which will give us -- you know, it will map us to that location. There are occasions where, you know, our -- our cell phones are more accurate or up to date and officers will use those as well. But, generally, if all that legwork is done by fire and development and all that, we -- we don't have any issues getting there. We go to some complex, like apartment complexes and things like that. So, we generally figure it out. Simison: I have been in Caldwell where, you know, in an apartment complex where it's been much more difficult to find a building, but I didn't know if that was similar when they are addressed this way or not. I was just trying to follow my Google map to get me to an address on Wrightwood to -- to see if I could understand just the written directions. I didn't know if you saw a visual as well overlaying an where individual home was. I know generally Google Maps will do that, but I didn't know if our CAD did that or not. Stokes: It -- it does to some degree and you can look at it in kind of different layers. Like on Google Maps you can have kind of an aerial view or more of an artistic view I guess. I'm not a pro on this, but, you know, when it's more looking like a map and not the aerial view. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 21 of 74 Simison: Okay. Thank you. Sorry, Council Woman Strader, did you have a follow up for the chief or captain? Strader: Yeah. I -- I guess I -- yeah, I'm not -- I'm not totally following. So, Chief Blume, are you saying you are comfortable with this, because the fire department would arrive on site and, then, read the sign and determine the address or -- I wasn't really clear on whether these addresses would be mapped somehow already for your team. Like if we are just using the example of the sign in Cadence, like this is a very small sign in my opinion to try to identify where you are going if it's not clear. So, if you could just provide a little more insight. Do you expect that emergency service would arrive and, then, hopefully, see this sign and, then, proceed or would it be mapped ahead of time in some way? How would that work? Blume: Right. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, Council Woman Strader. Much of what PD said we can echo. We have very elaborate and detailed -- once things are uploaded into our -- our CAD system as far as addressing and location and -- and -- and, again, I think that when we look at -- as the applicant has indicated that there are other examples of this allowance in -- in Meridian currently, we have not encountered a situation where that has been an impediment to our emergency response with the allowance that is allowed within the fire code of a monument or a pillar or a marker that indicates the physical address being on those signs. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I'm sorry. I'm -- it's probably excruciating for everyone, but if you could just explain -- so, the CAD system -- I'm not -- I'm not following -- I'm not tracking with what you are talking about. So, would a person be manually putting these addresses into your CAD system upon approval of this development and so, therefore, you are not concerned because that system that you are using will have these addresses mapped? Help me understand that. Is that an automated process that we don't have control over that comes from a third party? Like how -- how do those modifications happen in the CAD system? Blume: Council Woman Strader, that -- that actually is a brilliant question. To answer you honestly I don't know. I have been an end user of that product and everything is populated in the system now. What I do understand is that once the Council of the city and Planning approves a development to go in and as benchmarks are made in the progress of the development and -- and when there is a certificate of occupancy that gets issued, whatever entity -- and I apologize I do not know who that is -- that is updated on our CAD. So, it is a living document, if you will. It's a living map and it is updated periodically, sequentially to reflect existing and ongoing construction and occupancy. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 22 of 74 Simison: In short, Ada county is the holder of -- of the map and they dispatch to all the -- so, whether it was our police, our fire or ambulance or anybody else, they all use the same system, which is a map as -- I -- I haven't physically seen the map. That's why didn't want to answer the question, but they control it all, so everyone sees the same thing and so, yes, it would show on a map that says here is where you are going and when they would get there. But, you know, people drive in different ways and so some people may not look at a map, they may look at the directions and -- because it displays in a couple different ways, if I'm not mistaken. But, yes, it would show up on a map as this is the address, this is the location, and, in theory, you would show up and it would take you there. How -- how it directs you to there -- does it take you down -- I don't know which street you would, in theory, be addressed off, the one behind it or the main one, because that's like Wrightwood in theory would be the one to the north and, then, all those would be addressed off the one to the north if you look as to how Wrightwood was done. I don't know if that's what they would do here or how they would access which door through that process, so -- but that's -- it would be the CAD system and we work with Ada county to transmit that information to them and, then, they are the holder of it for everybody. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: A little history. When Reflection Ridge went in I was sitting in a different chair in this room and it was my job to go look at the alley loaded design before we would approve those first ones in Meridian on Wrightwood and they sent us over to southeast Boise off Warm Springs and we looked at one that was very very similar to what we have already on Wrightwood. At that time we did not have a computer-aided dispatch CAD system nearly as revolutionized as we have today. It was a much older system and even in those times Boise police was able -- and Boise fire and EMS were able to respond, because they are not looking at the sign. The signs are really for people that may not know where they are going. The CAD systems tell them exactly where they are going and eliminate all of that mystery. They do have people that work for Ada county that their sole job is -- is to take all of what we do in this whole county and input that into the system, so they know when we have annexed land they know when it's now ours and no longer Ada county's. So, that that's constantly being updated for the officers, for the firefighters, for EMS. So, I remember having first-hand knowledge of how this process worked when we did the first one off of Wrightwood. So, hearing what the -- what the Fire Chief is saying and what Captain Stokes is saying, I don't have any concerns from a public safety standpoint, because we have had these systems in our city now for well over ten years and it's worked flawlessly, especially in the new upgraded CAD systems. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 23 of 74 Strader: Well, that's extremely helpful. It gives me some comfort that a human is inputting the information into the system and can make adjustments. It's not like a Google Maps concept. So, that's what I was worried about. This is coming from Google Maps or something and that -- that terrifies me. But -- okay. So, in -- back to kind of the point I was getting to -- so, I think the only way I would be comfortable with this is -- to your point if -- if what we end up with here is a church, a gym and a daycare, that I get and, then, that does feel more like a mixed-use neighborhood designation to me, even though it may be a mixed-use community if that is a concept. I think I can get on board with that. But I guess my question to you would be are you far enough along with those leases that you would feel comfortable if that is a condition of approval, because what I don't want is to find, you know, a really intensive use land here and, then, that's totally inappropriate for the proximity of the residential. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Strader, the answer is, yes, we are. We haven't been able to finalize any of that, because this is all part of an updated preliminary plat. This area was -- when it was preliminary platted previously it was as a super block, so it was one parcel. So, as we have been working with a church and with the fitness facility and with the daycare, them moving forward is contingent upon us being able to move forward with the plat and so, yes, I can say that we are -- have advanced all those conversations and we are just kind of at that point where these things all are coming together at the same time. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: So, would -- would you be able to live with a development agreement condition that -- that is conditioned on, you know, those being approved uses and, then, if you needed to come back for, you know, a different use you would have to modify your agreement, is that something that you can support? Wardle: Yes. Mr. Mayor. I think the only thing I would ask for would be the allowance of an office. Strader: Okay. Wardle: But I -- I hear what you are saying. Perhaps like on the heavy retail, like a grocery or fuel or something like that, those would not be appropriate here. We wouldn't do those. But I think things that are -- tend to be very daytime specific, like a church, like fitness, although some fitness can be a little after hours as well, but I think those type of uses, including office, would be appropriate as a condition for Block 23. Strader: Okay. Thank you. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 24 of 74 Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Just to kind of follow up staying on this topic. I -- my concerns that I had initially about public safety and addressing I'm comfortable with that now, but I guess if you could speak, Jon, just for a little bit -- if we did not grant the waiver and -- what would you do? Would you put a street there? Like really -- because as I'm looking at it you could put a street there. To me it seems a little bit more aesthetically pleasing, but I'm kind of -- I'm open to what you are proposing to, but can you just walk me through if you didn't have the waiver and you had to put a street there what -- how would that change what you are proposing and why is that such a -- a concern for you with your design features? Wardle: Very good question. Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Council Member Taylor. If we were to put a street there the only place that a street could go would need to push a little bit farther to the east. You can kind of see down here there is an alignment there. That aligns with the access into the amphitheater and library and would come out to the north as well. So, we would need to move the residential over if we were to try to mix those two things together. It doesn't show up very well here, but you can kind of see where we are missing trees through the middle of that parking lot. That's also the Williams pipeline and so we also have that as well. So, we would start kind of shrinking down into the corner a little bit more and I think in that case we would end up with more of a multi-family for rent type opportunity than we would with platted lots and townhomes like we are proposing. It just -- we are trying to match with what we already have built across the street and these are carriage lane or alley loaded across the street. So, we are trying to have the same feel and we were mirroring that with another alley between the two. Taylor: Okay. That's very helpful. Thank you. Mr. Mayor, follow-up question. Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Going to the sidewalk discussion, same hypothetical. If we said, no, we are not going to grant the waiver and you need to put a sidewalk on that north side, I'm assuming you are going to have to cut into the slope to some degree. Can you give me a sense -- if you needed to put a sidewalk on that north side could you do that? Because I'm wondering is it possible to do and how would you do it? I mean are you cutting in quite a bit to the hillside? You know, are you going to have to put some reinforcements to the -- the -- the ground and earth, so it doesn't come down? Could you kind of walk me through conceptually how you would have to do that if we said you need to do the -- put a sidewalk in? Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Taylor, as I mentioned earlier there are different varying heights of where the Farr Lateral is as it relates as the slope move -- as the site moves to the west it becomes more severe and so the farther we are to the west we would be cutting in fairly significantly and that would also mean retaining walls and it would be significantly below the -- the bottom of the Farr Lateral. I'm not saying we Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 25 of 74 would have a situation where it could seep through, but I would really prefer not to be disturbing that slope as much as possible. So, is it possible? We could. We -- you know, going back and forth with staff and with ACHD on that we felt like because that there weren't any homes on that side of the road and we could landscape it and going back we can also add trees, I think it would perhaps impact your ability to plant as many trees along there as well. So, I think there would be some trade-offs. I think at a minimum we would have retaining walls to hold back that slope as we move farther to the west. Taylor: Okay, Simison: And maybe just to -- I think it's a great conversation. You know, if you put in a sidewalk, then, you definitely want a fence so people -- you want to invite people to this side of the street, maybe depends on what you think about that, because it would seem kind of silly to say let's put a sidewalk and, then, put up a fence and no one goes over there when there is really -- I mean really nothing there in that context and we don't want to put people on that side of the street in theory, you know. Yeah, wouldn't it be great to have a more natural walkway through there? Yeah. But I -- I don't know if that -- but to create something that was five feet -- that's what sidewalks are and you have a lot of the same basic challenges. But, yeah, it would seem awkward to say let's do a sidewalk and, then, require a fence up, because we put a sidewalk up, especially when there is one on the other side of the road. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Yeah. I appreciate you and Council Member Taylor bringing this up. I -- I -- think that you and I are on the same page. It's either you want to avoid people interacting with this area and, therefore, a fence is required or we see this as an attractive amenity -- in that case I think a sidewalk should be required. So, what I -- what I gathered from the applicant is that there is probably more of a desire to discourage utilizing the lateral. So, therefore, I think a fence that -- I think the applicant mentioned an open vision metal fence. To me I think that seems most appropriate if that's the direction the applicant wants to head. Allen: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Yes, Sonya. Allen: May I clarify? The UDC does require at the very least an attached sidewalk along both sides of public streets. There is no waiver for that. There isn't a variance allowance and there is no alternative compliance allowance. So, I just wanted you to be aware of that. Thank you. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 26 of 74 Simison: Can you remind us if anyone remembers what happened -- very similar -- it's actually a lot worse than what we didn't require on Victory right there at the same water -- it was basically going to be a sidewalk to nowhere, because there was no connection point that could be made. Did Council -- what was the decision the Council made on that project? Do people remember what I'm talking about? It's -- it's the one coming off of Reflection Ridge and that was -- when you come down Victory off of Stoddard it's got a hard right down there at the bottom and the development that went in on the south of that, there was side -- the sidewalk wasn't required, even though it was on an arterial, because it didn't connect to anything. That's my recollection. Maybe I'm wrong, but feel like we have addressed this in the past, even on an arterial issue with sidewalks. Parsons: Mayor, Members of the Council, I do remember that project and it -- the sidewalk just happened deeper into the site. So, it was put on that common lot with the hopes that it would go around the canal and, then, shoot back up through the -- the property that's undeveloped because of how close the Ridenbaugh is to the existing roadway. So, it was almost infeasible on -- it wasn't feasible to even do it. That was the challenge. And so we had them actually reroute it more internal to the site farther in and they -- so, that was the -- the compromise. The sidewalk's there, it's just farther away from the road than you typically see. Simison: Okay. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, if I could just add one note to that is if we had homes on both sides can guarantee you we would not be asking for a waiver. We have homes just on one side and we are not short of pathway connections in our community. We just feel like having it on the home side allows access to the other pathway system and really we aren't losing anything by not having it on the north side and it does keep us away from the Farr Lateral as well. Thank you. Cavener: So Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Maybe a question for either Bill or Sonya then. In -- in light of the -- the comment that this isn't something that the Council can have discretion on, there isn't necessarily an alternative route to maybe reroute a sidewalk for this project, I just want to make sure, Bill and Sonya, I'm correct a -- a sidewalk will have to be required regardless. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council, that -- that is my understanding per code. I see the applicant's point. However, Mr. Nary, if you have any additional comments -- I don't see any way around code, any -- like I mentioned, there is no -- there is no variance. A variance doesn't apply in that situation I don't believe and alternative compliance is not an option for our code to that standard. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 27 of 74 Nary: Mr. Mayor, Members of the -- Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council, I -- I -- would agree. I mean without -- those particular code -- and I think Mr. Parsons hit on the circumstance where it really was not feasible to put it in, not -- that it was impractical and I think that's kind of what the testimony's been is it's not a -- not a logical place to put a sidewalk and that might be the case, but we don't have an exception for that either. So, I -- I don't know. I -- I would agree, though, it doesn't make a lot of sense to have a sidewalk where there is no -- there is really nobody that's going to use it on that side of the street, it would only be on the other side -- have no other option. Simison: Maybe I will go back into my other vague memory bag of tricks. You know, recall a conversation on another project off of Eagle Road in the south where they were private lanes and only wanted to do -- and I think the compromise was they only did sidewalk on one side of the street, because it was a private lane. You know, you mentioned that this is not designed to be cut through. I look at this as a great cut through road potentially, but if it was a private road it would only require -- you know, I don't -- I think that you don't have to have the sidewalk on the second side and it -- it actually pulls it away from -- the width away. I don't know your thoughts on that or anybody else's thoughts on that, but it is a way to work through the code to get a solution that maybe works. Maybe. I don't know. Mr. Mayor, a couple thoughts here. This has been a topic of discussion with ACHD and with staff on this issue. We did have comment back from ACHD that they had spoken with city staff and they were on the same page in support of the request to not have the sidewalk on the north side. I hear what you are saying. Perhaps there is not a way to do that within the code. This is a later phase for us. It might be something that we need to discuss with staff in terms of updating or modifying the UDC. We do not feel like the sidewalk is needed. I don't feel, however, that we want to put a hard stop on this project over that sidewalk. Our preference is not to do it. We don't feel like it is needed. But if -- if your legal counsel is saying that there is not a mechanism to do it within the code right now, then, I would say put a condition and, then, we will work with staff and perhaps by the time that final plat comes along there is a workable solution. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Question for Bill Nary, the city attorney. What is the risk to the city if we waive a UDC requirement without a mechanism to do so? Like what would happen if we -- if we just -- if we approved our development agreement, not requiring a sidewalk on the north side, but with additional conditions instead, I mean what would happen? Just curious. Nary: So, Mr. Mayor, Members of Council, Council Member Strader, you are asking what would you -- what happens if you waive a code requirement that you already have. So, nothing happens particularly, but you are waving a code that you -- that's already the law and I guess the -- the condition I -- or the caution I have for you as counsel is where does that end; right? You will get that question again and with no mechanism in Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 28 of 74 your code to allow granting, you were, then, indiscriminately going to choose when you wish to waive a code or not. I don't know how you would do that. That's the problem is the precedent I think in doing it. I think -- I think one option -- Mr. Parsons and I was just talking -- is right now ACHD isn't requiring it. It is a code condition. I like -- I like Mr. Wardle's concern. We can maybe work -- let staff work on that with -- with -- with the developer here and we may be able to find an alternate solution of something that still will meet the intent of the code and not hold up the project and not necessarily waive the code either and we just may not have that solution today. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I think that makes sense to me. So, in other words, it could be stating the desire of Council, acknowledging that that is not permissible under the current code, directing staff to work on this issue in the future and the code has not been waived. So, it will just be an outstanding issue. Nary: Yes. Strader: Okay. Nary: Thank you. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Mayor and Jon, I'm going to play the new guy card probably for the last time. I'm the new guy, but in the staff report I heard -- and maybe I didn't hear correctly, but one of the outstanding issues for us is that north-south corridor or road, public street, between the residential and the commercial lots in Block 23 and I believe staff indicated that that -- waiving that requirement or deleting that requirement is not allowed by ACHD. So, help me reconcile the request to delete that requirement when ACHD won't allow that to be deleted. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Whitlock, welcome. You can use the new card -- new guy card as much as you want. The conversation with the highway district was a public road in that location being that close to Crescendo, which is a collector, Apex which is a collector and I'm not sure the Phenomenal is, but we have these roads -- but there are setbacks and distances from a public road to a public road. It just doesn't work in that alignment and, as I mentioned, as we -- if we looked at other types of remodeling -- modifying that block it would be different than what we are showing here and it will probably be more intense and wouldn't be this type of home living opportunity. So, we never pursued the public road through there. We didn't feel like it was needed or necessary. That was something that popped up, honestly, in the staff report that Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 29 of 74 came just before Planning and Zoning Commission and, then, the revision was let's just get away -- let's do away with all the residential altogether was the new condition that was in front of you. We think that this has designed where the vehicular access for these homes happens in an alley or in a carriageway. There are garages on each of these homes and there are driveways. So, each of these homes has sufficient places to park and does meet and I -- we don't need to just meet the code requirement, but they do comply and we feel like the way that they open up, even though the buffer is maybe a little different than what would be typical with a commercial versus residential, but even the thing here is we control the whole block. We are bringing you what our intent is and we are showing you how this will be designed and be built. So, for us we never pursued a public road through there, because we felt very strongly that the design and the configuration that we have here does work. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Just to thank you for that and that helps and just added to the clarity to the answer that you gave Council Member Taylor, so I appreciate that. Wardle: Thank you. Whitlock: First let me applaud you. As I reviewed and looked at your open space percentage, as well as the amenity scores that you have, I think those are great. You mentioned community pools and, again, I'm in the learning phase. What's your definition of a community pool? Does the HOA own that? Who has access to those amenities in this division -- in this subdivision. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Whitlock, that's a great question. So, the pools would be owned and maintained by the homeowners association and so their annual fees and dues would pay for that. We typically -- on average we -- about 275 to 350 homes we need a pool and so in the southeast part we have already built one pool. We are building a second pool right now and, then, we have a third pool up here and they are really kind of connected with a pathway system and have some interconnectivity. Part of that is, you know, having some variety and options in the pool types, but each of these pool houses also have a gathering room -- a large gathering space where if somebody wanted to have a party they would be able to do that outside of their home. Maybe a pool party and that. But it would be available for them year round as well. The pathway system, which is shown through this corridor, is really open to the public and we really hope that the public just moves through here and kind of on a diagonal through the project, but the access to the pools themselves behind the gate, that would be by card. I'm pretty sure that if neighbors from outside were coming in and using playgrounds and things like that -- there is not going to be an issue, but they -- outside of the HOA they probably would not have access to the pools. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 30 of 74 Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Pardon my last question I have. Staff is recommending if we grant the waiver in Block 23 that the common area MEW be 20, not 15 feet. Can you speak to that? Is that something that you are open to or is that something that you are not open to? Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Taylor, inches count. In this case adding another five feet would mean we would take five feet out of the home -- or five feet out of the drive aisle or the parking in the back and things like that. So, could we do it? We could. Our preference -- and we feel like we have -- we have a very good landscape buffer between the front of these homes and the parking lot area. It is in a common lot to be maintained in common by the association. So, it's not -- what's the sidewalk to the parking lot is, you know, everybody can use or have access to, so we can control that, but we would prefer to keep the 25 feet as it is and not adding any additional width to the common lot there. Simison: Council, any additional questions for the applicant? Okay. Thank you very much. Wardle: Thank you. Simison: Mr. Clerk, anyone signed up to provide testimony on this item? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, yes. First is Carsten White. Simison: And come on up and state your name and address for the record. White: How are you guys doing? I'm Carsten White. My address is 6162 South Tarrega Lane, Meridian, Idaho. 83642. So, I have lived here pretty much most of my life and it's -- it's just west of this development. So, I have been driving down Phenomenal for nine months or so while the construction is all done on Lake Hazel and there is a few things that I have noticed during this construction and as the front part gets done. One of the things is the current tenant -- or the current owners or people that live in those homes, even though they have garages in the back, they are parking along those roads. So, when we talk about that development where the duplex is going to be, if you look at it there is roads on every side of that -- that residential property and even though there is going to be garages for people parking, a lot of time people just have a lot of stuff. So, they are going to be parking along those roads, which is going to cause -- you know, it -- we can't even drive two cars side by side on Phenomenal most of the time, because there is too many cars parked on there and so part of my concern is that there is just too many -- there is too many people, there is too many houses with no backyards, no space for things and the proposal of this change does the same thing, it just -- you have alleyways, you don't have any yards for anyone to be in and so they just -- it's too crowded all tight in and even though it's -- you know, there is 27 percent green space -- well, I mean there has got to be green space, because no one has any yard with that. So, I -- my -- my issue with living by this and -- you know, we are -- we Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 31 of 74 are -- we built a house there in 2020. We are still considered county, but eventually we are planning on changing that -- is that we are just -- we are -- we are increasing the density of this area and not accounting for the traffic that happens, you know, that it causes problems with and I just think that's something that we need to consider when we are, you know, approving these -- these developments that, you know, don't have yards and don't have parking for people. You know, we have an amphitheater right across the street from that. So, when there is an event at that amphitheater where are all those people going to park? You know, you have got the parking around the library and things like that, but it doesn't look like there is enough to account for those things. The other thing as we have been sitting here listening to this, you know, we have these commercial buildings that they are proposing next to these residential properties and these commercial buildings we are talking about with churches and gyms and so forth that are day use, but, you know, ten years down the road is that always going to be the case? I mean gyms don't stay in business forever a lot of times. Things change. So, is that necessarily going to stay that way? And do we want to see -- you know, is that the best use for the properties is to stuff a few more residential homes in there just to, you know, increase the amount of people that are living in one area in one street. So, as you guys decide, you know, what to do and what you agree with and approve, I just -- I would like you to take that into account and in mind when -- when you are thinking about it. So thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader got you, so --. Cavener: No problem. Happy to yield. Strader: Just a quick question for you, Mr. -- Mr. White. So, at least as I'm looking at it I do get comfort from the existence of this gigantic parking lot next to the duplexes. I mean it, obviously, would be an area that residents could park. I would imagine it would be convenient. People could -- could utilize that. So, does that help alleviate your concern in that specific area of Block 23 or is your concern all of the duplexes and the whole development? I mean it's not all duplexes. It's quite a bit of a single family that do have yards; right? So, I just kind of wanted to understand your -- your perspective on that. It was specific to Block 23 where your concern is or is it other -- White: I -- I would say that's a concern probably because we have been paying attention to it almost the whole meeting, but -- Strader- Right. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 32 of 74 White: -- you know, just -- living on the streets altogether I just -- I feel like they are tight streets and you have people parked on every side of them all the time. There is constantly vehicles parked along Phenomenal and -- you know. And those are single family homes along there. So, I'm not -- I don't necessarily think it's just because, you know, there is a duplex. Yes, that parking lot in there is going to be nice, you know, but what happens when the church is full, you know, or the gym, it's 5:00 o'clock, is that -- you know, is that enough? I -- you know, I don't know enough about, you know, estimated numbers of -- you know, of parking to account for that, but it's more on just what my personal experience on that road is, you know, and what we have seen so far is what I would -- you know, is what I'm kind of basing it off of. Strader: Thanks. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Mr. White, thank you for coming and testifying tonight. Sorry I'm calling in remotely tonight. Public testimony I think is always important for the Council to kind of provide that on-the-ground perspective, which I think you -- you did tonight and -- and you made a comment that at least piqued my interest, which was talking about your -- kind of your belief that maybe some of the commercial use, the gym, the church is maybe not the best use of the property and recognizing this land has already been annexed and zoned, help me understand kind of from your perspective what you think a better use is than what the applicant's proposing and why? White: I would suggest you keep it commercial. Put some more office buildings in there, you know, instead of residential. That if -- if we look at day use commercial buildings that's going to alleviate the -- the traffic instead of -- what is that 20 more residential homes or even more on that -- that property. I think commercial would be a better use for that. Cavener: Thank you. Simison: Council, any additional questions? All right. Thank you very much. White: Thank you. Johnson: And, Mr. Mayor, Jenna White. Simison: No comment. Okay. Is that everyone who signed up? Is there anybody else present who would like to provide testimony on this item or if you are online use the raise your hand feature. Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward to close. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, for the record Jon Wardle with Brighton. I appreciate the opportunity to just make a couple last comments. First, I do know that we did make life very inconvenient for Mr. White and his neighbors on Tarrega. When you rebuild a five -- a two lane roadway to a five lane road and you take away access, that does -- it does Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 33 of 74 make it more difficult. So, we do appreciate -- or I guess acknowledge the -- the cross- property access that was given to them and I know that they -- they now have temporary access back to Lake Hazel and there will be other development that will happen around them as well and so there -- there will be some changes there, too. I will note that all of the roads in and around the area that are here are allowed to have parking on both sides and they are -- all these homes as well are alley loaded, which means we aren't competing with driveways on the front of these homes and so, yes, it may feel like there is parking there and that's going to occur, but people are generally -- that would be for guests or if they have something leftover -- you know, somebody coming over or vacation, that type of thing, I -- I think the thing that we have tried to do -- we have been very thoughtful in our design in terms of an overall grid pattern and the overall project. I know that there has been quite a bit of conversation this evening on Block 23. We feel like we -- we have looked at this as a whole. Keep in mind that it's currently zoned R-15. So, we are asking for an opportunity to do a mixed-use project here and not just all residential or something we would have to come back in with a conditional use permit and so we are looking at the whole picture of Block 23 and we feel like there is an opportunity to -- to do this right. I don't want to say trust us, but we are committed to it. We are committed to making a very meaningful investment just as we have already and I think this is another opportunity to show how this can be done in a good way. I believe the -- the one kind of outstanding question is that -- related to that sidewalk. I would just ask that -- that final decision be made at the time that final plat comes through and we will work with staff in a collaborative way to see if we can come up with language that would perhaps allow for our request of just a sidewalk on one side. We have -- we have been excited about Pinnacle from the day that we thought about it to where we are today and there are a number of other things that are coming that will continue to add value not just to the new residents, but the entire south Meridian area. Again, I appreciate the opportunity to stand for any final questions Council might have, but request that you allow us to move forward with Block 23 as designed and also to consider the -- allowing the block length -- block faces to be exceeded on both Precipice and Vertex. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Council, additional questions or comments? Parsons: Mr. Mayor? This is Bill. May I just add a little bit while you guys have the public record open, just to help Council kind of deliberate on the decision tonight. I know it's a lot to digest, a lot of waivers, what can happen, what can't happen. So, a couple things. Appreciate the discussion on addressing tonight. Just wanted to give the Council -- and let you know that we are looking at improving that process and there is some code changes potentially coming to help define that a little bit better. So, we aren't here in front of you trying to explain it to you, because it is very complex as you find out. It is -- it's not just as simple as putting an address on a map and being done with it. There is a lot that goes into it and everything that we do in our world is tied to an address, meaning building permits, some land use application. So, it's -- we want a very robust addressing system, because we use it extensively. So, I won't belabor that topic. I think we got through that tonight and you can see fire code does address that. So, I think we have that captured and I appreciate the comment on that. A couple of Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 34 of 74 things. When ACHD approached the city about the sidewalk on the north side of Precipice, I told them that a waiver wasn't allowed. We don't have that -- that requirement in our code. But they felt that the sidewalk would be better served on the south side of the road than the north side of the road for the reason -- reasons you heard tonight. So, really, their condition of approval said don't do a sidewalk if the city approves it. Well, the city can't approve that. So, it puts us in a difficult bind. Yeah. So, they required it, so -- based on that feedback, so -- but I know in certain instances we have -- what we don't want to do is put the applicant -- us against ACHD's requirements and vice-versa. So, I'm -- I'm glad that you are wanting to be flexible on that moving forward and I appreciate the Mayor's comments saying private street doesn't require sidewalks, yet public streets require sidewalks on both sides. That's kind of a two way thing. So, to me I like that. Keep continue working, let staff work with ACHD, maybe ACHD says they don't want the sidewalk and all of a sudden now we have a condition that can't be complied with. So, at least think about that as well in your -- your condition tonight. The other thing that I wanted to talk about was Council Woman Strader's comment on restricting the uses through the DA. That gets a little dicey for us to try to regulate that and manage that through a development agreement, but I was thinking, you know, the applicant -- they presented to you their case for why the residential blends in and they want more of a neighborhood commercial feel there. So, why not see if C-N zoning works better for them. The C-N zone will allow the gym use permitted use. The C-N zone would allow the church. The C-N zone would allow the office. And so, then, that helps kind of give your concerns about what if things change over time, how do we address hours of operation? Well, that zone restricts it from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., just like an L-O office zone does. So, that's something's that you can do rather than restricting uses through the DA and that allows them to kind of tie in that residential if you are leaning that way. The other option they have, too, as far as the reduction -- reduction -- or the 15 foot up to the 20 feet, the applicant has the ability to add two additional feet to that buffer and have a total of 17 feet and shrink those parking stalls to 17 feet under code for vehicle overhang. So, they could technically get 17 feet additional, unless Council wants the 20 feet. So, anyways, I know I threw a lot out of -- out on you on that, but I at least wanted to give you -- there is some flexibility there and some ways that we can work with the applicant to solve some of these concerns moving forward. Simison: Thank you, Bill. Allen: Mr. Mayor, if I may add a couple of items also for Council's consideration before a motion. One being the discussion about possibly shared parking on the commercial property for the residences along that east boundary on Block 23. There is currently not an easement for that that would allow that. So, if that's something that's important to you, please, require that on the commercial property. Also, please, make an action on whether fencing is required or not along the Farr Lateral for public safety. If you feel the fence is needed for public safety, please, require one. It's not currently required in the staff report. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 35 of 74 Simison: And just to clarify, you said shared parking. Are you saying having something that allows the residents to park there under an assumption? Like I say, if I lived in that house I just -- I would just park there. I don't -- Allen: Those businesses could technically come out and say, hey, this is our property, you can't park here. So, if that's something that you are intending, please, include a requirement. Simison: Okay. Mr. Wardle, would you like to reply to any of the things that were stated just -- maybe especially the zoning conversation? Wardle: Mr. Mayor, appreciate Mr. Parsons' suggestion. I'm doing the same thing he is doing right now, I'm looking through the code. My really quick analysis is that a C-N is fine. I don't think that there would be anything there that causes any issue if it brings some certainty that that would be more lower intensity. I believe that we can work within the C-N zoning for that request. We did request C-C just because C-C is across the street to the south, that's where the library is and the amphitheater, that's all C-C zone. But going to the north if we went to C-N as a way to bridge between those two that would be fine. We would -- we can accept that modification of the zoning request from a C-C to a C-N for the balance of Block 23. 1 also appreciate Mr. Parsons' suggestion on the parking. He is correct, we could go -- instead of a 19 foot we can go down to 17 feet and add two more feet into that common lot to accommodate a little bit more space. So, get a total of 17 instead of the 15 that we show. So, there might be a little bit way to get more than 15, but we don't want to have a hard requirement of 20. So, I think we can work within those Items. Can't remember if there was another item that -- Sonya, that you had mentioned there at the end. Is there any other items? The fencing. On -- along the Farr. Allen: Fencing along the Farr for public safety. That lateral is open. It's mostly, from what I understand from the applicant's narrative, that lateral is mostly on the adjacent property and not on this property. The applicant I don't believe requested a waiver to leave that lateral open because of that, because it's mostly on the other property. Not sure if you want to go ahead and grant that for where it lies on this property. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, Sonya is correct. Most of -- if not all of it is not on our property. So, it's on the property to the north and we just are up to it. So, we did not propose any fencing along there. Could we? We could, but we are not going to be doing any modifications or tiling or piping the Farr Lateral. Simison: Thank you. Council, anything else at this time for the applicant? Okay. One thing I just want to -- you know, on a -- the -- the -- we don't see this a lot in someone having a property for a church. I mean there is a lot of churches out there looking for space and the fact that someone is actually bringing in a project that has one, because normally you see individual projects from churches for their property. But you guys making -- bringing this to the table I know someone's going to be very happy out there in the community if this is approved that they have a space to call their own and -- and do Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 36 of 74 that and I just want to applaud you for that, because we don't see that a lot in a lot of developments. Mr. Mayor, if I can just make one I guess social comment is we don't have -- well, we should encourage as many places to gather outside of our homes and outside of our work. Churches are one of those. Libraries are one of those. Parks are those places. So, the more as a community which Meridian is known for, being a community that is very people friendly and safe, we should strive for that. So, we feel fortunate, because we have had that conversation with others that are interested in being here and we look forward to working with another local community partner out here at Pinnacle. Thank you. Simison: Thank you. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: It was suggested maybe we take a quick break before we deliberate. That might be good for you to have a minute to review the C-N code requirements as well just to make sure. Simison: Okay. Well, let's take a -- we will reconvene at 8:05. Is that enough time, 13 minutes roughly? Okay. We will recess until then. (Recess: 7:52 p.m. to 8:05 p.m.) Simison: All right. Council, we will go ahead and come back from recess. Does the applicant have any comments you would like to make? Wardle: Mr. Mayor, for the record Jon Wardle with Brighton. We did get a chance to look at the zoning question. There is a little bit of a -- perhaps a little issue in particular with the fitness. The fitness user that we are working with, they do allow access 24/7, although it is by key card, but under the C-N it looks like the hours are limited and a conditional use is not allowed under that consideration. You can't do a conditional use permit under C-N to extend the hours beyond that. If they wanted to do that within a C-C you could, but there is not that flexibility. So, I know right off the bat we are going to have an issue with one potential user that wouldn't even be able to do a conditional use permit under a C-N for their use. So, I know there is probably concerns about limiting uses perhaps within the DA by staff, but that would be a complication for us. There was one other item -- as staff and I were chatting we do have a part of the Farr Lateral. Most of the Farr Lateral is not on our property. It's actually outside of our property, but when we get up to the north piece where we have a large common area that's open, the Farr Lateral is on our property and I guess we are talking with staff we either need to tile that or ask for a waiver for it to not be tiled and I guess we would be asking for a waiver of that to not tile the Farr Lateral and if we needed to come up with another solution we can work with them in terms of fencing and things like that to limit access to it. So, with that stated I guess I'm -- I'm not as comfortable a moment ago as I am -- well, I'm not Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 37 of 74 comfortable now as I was just a few minutes ago looking at some of the restrictions on the C-N zone in particular with one user wouldn't be allowed to operate there. So, we would continue to request a C-C. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. Would it be possible to get some feedback from staff on if it was zoned under C-N is that -- is that the case that we wouldn't be able to allow some sort of an exception for key card access to the fitness facility? Like how would that all play out? Help me understand that, please. Allen: Yeah. Mr. Mayor, Council Woman Strader, Council, the -- the code restricts hours of operation in the L-O and the C-N district from 6:00 a.m to 10:00 p.m. There are no allowances for conditional use permits for an extension of those hours like there is in the C-C and C-G districts. So, adjacent to residential use. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I think what's challenging there is I like that restriction generally, but I understand the applicant's business plan and -- and I -- you know, I have used fitness facilities that are kind of like that that have key card access and I don't -- at least I have -- in my experience personally, you know, I haven't studied it or something, but my experience personally is that you are not going to have a huge number of people accessing the facility off hours. So, I wouldn't be as concerned. I just wish there was a mechanism to create a waiver or a conditional use there, so -- Allen: Similar to the sidewalk issue there -- there are no provisions. Strader: Uh-huh. Okay. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. And so in -- in -- in staff's view with the challenges of having a DA, then, having to monitor the uses and can you all get comfortable with that or how do you sort of view that? Would you -- would your preference be to -- to zone it, you know, commercial and, then, sort of take that approach or how would -- how would you like us to -- I mean what was your feedback there I guess? Simison: Can you just do a DA with all the requirements of the C-N minus the hours of restriction and that's where we essentially were. Why -- why couldn't that be the DA provision for that area or is that illegal? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 38 of 74 Allen: Mr. Mayor, you -- you could do that. The -- the other consideration is that if you leave it C-N zoning as requested they would still have to come back with a conditional use permit for an extension of hours. So, just be careful of that. That's not something you can just include in the DA that they have extended hours without approval of a conditional use permit. Wardle: Just to clarify, that's in a C-C. So, in a C-C if the hours were beyond 11:00 p.m. at night, then, that user would -- would need to come to the city and say we -- this is our use and this is what we are doing. So, it would be under a conditional use permit. But if we go to a C-N we don't have that option at all. Allen: And it caps it from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Simison: And I guess my point was if your -- if your DA provision just says these are the uses, which is what's allowed under the C-N, but you are -- you don't really address the hour issue. So, the hour issue doesn't apply, because it's not part of it and it's just the uses. Wardle: Mr. Mayor, we would be fine with that -- with a DA provision zoning at C-C with the provision being that it would be the C-N uses. Simison: Right. And, then, everything else still applies to the C-C process for hours of operation for future elements. Or you just got to get a gym that only wants to be open until 11:00 p.m. Parsons: Mayor and Council, if I can just touch on that subject a little bit. I'm -- I'm looking at code here and a couple uses that stand out to me that's different between C-N -- really the difference is the hours like you said, Mayor. That's the primary difference. But there is a couple -- there are a couple of notable ones that I want to share with Council on this. So, flex space is a permitted use in that zone. Multi-family is a conditional use in the C-C zoning district, but it's not allowed in the C-N zone. Fuel cells facility is principally permitted in a conditional use in the C-N zone. So, although I -- I -- I appreciate the applicant saying, yes, these are the uses we are going to have here, things change over time as you know and once we give zoning we give zoning and that's -- again staff is still comfortable with C-C zoning, just was trying to talk out loud and see if there was a compromise where we could give you some comfort level that, hey, there is some other options to think about here. But as far as retail stores, retail is allowed. Wireless facilities are allowed. Storage is not allowed, but self storage is allowed in the C-C zone through a conditional use permit. So, it really -- it is somewhat of a higher more intense zoning district, but it still is -- still fits with the mixed- use designation probably is the best way to say that, so -- but it's still more of a tracking issue. What I -- what -- what staff gets fearful of is -- if we get a new hire or somebody calls us up and says, hey, this is C-C, can I do this use on that property, yes, in the perfect world we are hoping that people are pulling up the ordinance looking at that development agreement and -- and sharing that information, but we are all human, we all make mistakes and -- and -- and that -- that -- that has occurred and so that's why Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 39 of 74 when we have these conversations with you we try to -- we try to steer away from that as much as possible. My memory serves -- one of my fond memories was the Albertson's off of Amity and Eagle Road. Originally we had recommended L-O zoning on that particular property and, then, we thought we were going to cap that to just L-O uses on the site through the C-C zone and ultimately we didn't do either one of those things, but I remember that project and us having that conversation and, then, recently Council just acted on that DA modification where he came in with two drive-throughs and you are like one only works, we don't want two here. So, this would -- C-N, I believe, allows drive throughs. So, again, that's -- my point is is we want the zoning to match what they intend to do there and I think in this particular case C-N or C-C works minus the hours of operation. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: So, yeah, but my -- my preference would be to zone it C-N and have a mechanism to get an exception to the hours of operation for one user. You are saying there is no mechanism that exists in code to do so. Parsons: Mayor, Members of the Council, there isn't currently, but you can ask staff to look at that with a future code change. That's the mechanism. You change the code. Strader: Uh-huh. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Unless there is any additional testimony we need to take, I think we are kind of inching into deliberation stage. So, unless anyone else wants to make any more comments, I would make a motion that we end public testimony. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 40 of 74 Taylor: Just to share a couple thoughts as we are deliberating, I was kind of holding -- waiting until we kind of were going in back and forth. I'm -- I'm not personally very supportive of the idea of -- of putting conditions on a development agreement or changing the zoning request, because I feel like -- I understand what we are trying to do with being sensitive to the types of uses, not wanting to have a heavy use in the commercial right next to the residential, but I have just concerns generally with that approach that the city might take. I think it just would get messy potentially down the road and I -- I have concerns, even though I'm super sympathetic to that, which is why I was kind of wondering about having a different kind of a buffer of a -- the roadway, but looking at the -- the design and the layout of the property with -- I think it's the Williams pipeline, if I'm recalling correctly that went right through there, created some -- I can see there is some design challenges that -- how to fit things in there. I'm not personally a -- a fan of alley loaded homes. I think aesthetically it's pleasing, but I think functionally don't -- don't like how they work. I have been in some of those little alleyways and they do get crowded. Excuse me. You know, putting out, you know, the garbage cans and all that, it -- it -- it gets crowded and cluttered and so I -- I don't like them from a functionality point of view. But I also, looking at this application and looking at what's previously been approved, it does seem to be consistent with what previous councils have approved nearby and with -- with the plan. So, this would probably be something that Block 23 -- probably reluctantly say I think the argument convinced me to -- to grant the waiver there, even though it's not my preferred way, but it seems like it's kind of a unique piece of property that maybe warrants that. I'm really intrigued by the idea with the sidewalk. I think if you put a sidewalk there you just encourage people to go over there, which would make me say let's put a fence up. But it seems to me that's something we probably need to figure out how to address later and I would probably be open to not requiring the sidewalk to be built with the idea that we need to come back and -- and figure out how to fix that. So, depending on how the rest of the Council might feel about that, I would be curious how we would maybe suggest going about that. But it -- I think tonight I'm -- I came in sort of 50-50, not sure what I was thinking about the -- the project, but given the -- the arguments I think I worked through most of my concerns. I don't love some of it, but I think it seems like a necessary way to -- to get through getting the -- the project to be designed and developed in a way that makes some sense. So, I think -- I think I'm likely to be supportive of that, but I do -- I don't want to put conditions on the development agreement. I don't want to ask for different zoning and if -- if we did do that I probably would oppose that motion. Simison: Just food for thought, because it's in my head right now, I don't know the process for getting the road declared a private road or if that's what you would want to do. Like can you have a 35 foot private road or does that -- does it have to be 29 feet? You know, I don't know. That's just one of those things like maybe it's needs to function as a main road, but really it's the maintenance of it, unless it's long term and that's the cost of the HOA ultimately that would be the one that would bear that cost in the future, but a practical standpoint to call it a private road would seem to be a way to do it, even though it was built to public street width -- I don't know who decides ultimately it would be allowed, if that's an ACHD decision based on the layout that would have to go back to them, if that was what we want to do. But for you to see future conversations. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 41 of 74 Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: There are a lot of pieces to this tonight. And the things I really liked at the beginning, which is the lower densities for a product this size really appeals to me, because I see a lot of really high density projects. Those seem to delve into a lot of transportation issues as we go and this one I don't really see that. I see a lot of lower density as we go as a -- as a matter of net density, gross density in this project. We get hung up on a couple of things, but I think we have come up with a plan on how to allow staff and the applicant to work through them. Again, I think -- I echo what others have said, I'm afraid if I put a sidewalk on the other side of Precipice it's going to encourage people to be on it. We don't have a mechanism to deal with that tonight, so I think we need to leave that in as a requirement and let staff and the applicant work. I had a lot of initial concerns about alley loaded lots years ago when we first got them in the city. I wasn't too convinced at the time that they would work, but I have watched them work and especially the ones that we talked about in Reflection Ridge. I actually knew people that lived in one and we went over and visited them and surprisingly they worked very well. All in all through everything that we have talked about tonight in this project I will be in support. I think it's an outstanding addition to what they have done already and they have done so much already in this area that I will definitely be in support of this project. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. So, in thinking through it I agree with Councilman Taylor in the sense that I normally do not like to condition development agreements if it can be avoided. In this case I think it's warranted, because the applicant is asking for us to be extremely flexible and actually to support their plan for the development go against our own staff's recommendation and so that's to me the justification of why the adjacent uses should be limited. I'm very uncomfortable with proceeding with Block 23 under a C-C zone without any conditions, because I don't think it would be appropriate for residential uses to be in such close proximity to what could become a gas station, a number of uses that were rattled off by Mr. Parsons were I think extremely problematic for this location. That -- that would bother me. I think the maximum block face waiver makes sense in this case because of the site constraints. The -- I think we have alignment on our sidewalk requirement and how to craft through that. Where I'm going with it is I would be more comfortable with allowing the C-C zoning, but limiting the uses to those within the C-N zoning designation and, then, you know, there are downsides to that and understanding that staff would have to monitor that. We as concerned neighbors would have to monitor that and that would be kind of the mechanism. It's an imperfect mechanism, but there is no path through the actual C-N zoning designation and the C-C zone designation without any restrictions is unacceptable to me, because I don't think that those -- depending on what the use could be, I think it could be extremely problematic, Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 42 of 74 although I know that's not their business plan and, then, understood on the tiling of the Farr Lateral not being palatable. I understand that I think some type of open vision fencing desire could be crafted in our discussion on the sidewalk requirement. I'm prepared to make a motion with all of my conditions, but Councilman Taylor started our discussion, so if he wants to kick us off I'm happy to listen, but I think probably you understand where I'm coming out on that. I just -- I think the C-C zoning without restrictions is problematic for Block 23. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I don't know if you are looking for me or not, but I appreciate a good conversation. Tried to remain largely quiet tonight being remote. I share some of the same concerns as Council Member Strader. While I do not anticipate that this applicant would intend to put a gas station necessarily on that block, I do think from a -- a consistency standpoint to just provide some greater structure and clarity around that particular piece, I'm -- I'm -- I'm in support of that. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: A quick clarifying question maybe for staff. I know we have talked a lot about it. My mind is just kind of trying to remember what we decided. But with the issue with the sidewalk, how would we revisit that? If we say this is something we want to come back and address permanently later we would just instruct the applicant to work with staff. I mean I -- I'm struggling to understand maybe how you would actually go about this. I'm okay saying let's not require them to build the sidewalk now given that we are going to come back and fix it the right way later, but I don't know how we actually would go about doing that. Allen: Mr. Mayor, Council, I would recommend leaving the provision as is that requires a sidewalk per current code, because that is the requirement, but allowing a verbiage in that condition unless otherwise required by code at that time or something to that effect and -- and staff can craft some language to that effect if that's your wish to allow some wiggle room there if something changes between now and then. Please, Mr. Mayor, additionally, please don't, forget to address the applicant's request for a waiver to leave the Farr Lateral open and not tile it in the areas where it crosses this site and also whether or not you want to require fencing for public safety along that lateral and the parking easement on the commercial if that's your wish. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 43 of 74 Strader: I think the public hearing is closed. I will take a crack at a motion and we could just sort of see how it -- how it shakes out, how it plays out, understanding I think there are some Council Members that have concerns and I understand those concerns based on principle, but maybe we will -- we will just give it a try here, so -- okay. Make sure we are all right. Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony I move to approve File No. H-2024-0014 as presented in the staff report for today's hearing date with the following conditions and modifications. Number one that we would grant the maximum block face waiver for Precipice and Vertex. Number two, we would not waive the UDC requirements for a sidewalk on the north side of Precipice. However, we would document the City Council's desire to not see a sidewalk on the north side of Precipice and instead to have landscaping with trees as depicted by the applicant and an open vision fencing along the Farr Lateral, directing staff to work internally to determine if changes to our Unified Development Code are appropriate holistically in light of the needs of the city. Number three, we would grant -- grant the applicant's request for waivers for their buffers. However, adding an additional two feet to those buffers as described by staff, that we would require an easement to allow for residential parking in the adjacent commercial uses and that the acceptable uses as documented in the development agreement would reflect the uses that are approved in the C-N zoning. And so directing staff to include that language in the development agreement. And, then, finally, number four, we would not require tiling of the Farr Lateral in the areas that are on the applicant's property. Hopefully that captured everything. Open for discussion. Allen: Mr. Mayor, may I clarify? Simison: Yes. Before we get a second we will allow it to be continued to be modified. Allen: Did your proposal include fencing for the entire length of the Farr Lateral? Strader: Yes. Allen: Thank you. Simison: Do I have a second? Overton: I will second. Simison: Have a second. Discussion? Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 44 of 74 Whitlock: Question for the maker of the motion on the very last item. A development agreement that included the C-N conditions, was there an intent there on the hours to allow a C-C hour provision? Strader: Mr. Mayor, this would be zoned C-C, but the allowed uses would be the same as the C-N zoning, so the same mechanisms that exist under the C-C zoning for hours of operation would apply. I think. I'm getting a head nod, so I think so. Overton: Second agrees. Allen: Mr. Mayor, I have another clarification when I'm able to speak. Simison: Okay. Allen: Thank you. There is currently a condition in the staff report that Block 2 is revised -- is reconfigured to meet ACHD's public alley standards. Are you wanting -- is your wish to approve it as proposed without the requirement of a public street and addressing from the adjacent public street? Thank you. Just wanted to clarify. Strader: Thank you. That is correct. Yeah. I would modify my motion to reflect that. Overton: Second agrees. Simison: Okay. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Before we vote just generally I -- not sensing where everyone wants to kind of -- kind of weigh in on some of this, generally supportive of the -- the project. Just to be consistent kind of with -- with my earlier statement, I'm comfortable with the idea of putting such requirements around a development agreement. So, I would oppose it on that purpose. But generally I think the -- the project is a good project and would be great if it went forward. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Wow, we have had definitely a lot of moving parts with this one. Overall I think it's a great project. Love all the open space. I think it's going to be a wonderful -- it will potentially be a wonderful addition to that area. I am real concerned about putting parameters on businesses, but I do -- I'm okay with how it's done since we have used another zoning. So, it -- rather than specifically say what businesses can be there and what can't, we have used a zoning description and so I am okay with that. But overall I Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 45 of 74 think we have answered all my questions. I have got lots of notes through here as -- as we have gone, but I think overall it's a really great project, so I will be supporting it. Simison: Any further comments on the motion? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I realized I seconded the motion. Just another comment. I do believe before we -- I don't want to get too caught up in the -- that we are restricting the lot use. I believe we are actually -- we are actually changing the use to what the applicant requested, which was to have this C-N designation, but have the hours of C-C and I don't necessarily see that as a restriction, I see that as meeting the needs of the applicant and his request and I would support it for that reason. Simison: Any further discussion? If not, Clerk will call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, nay; Whitlock, yea. Simison: Five ayes, one nay and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Simison: Thank you very much. Good luck and I know there are still going to be more I'm going to see and do on this one, but hopefully that's a path forward that will provide the best outcome for the project. Simison: So, with that we will move on to -- make sure I get the right one -- Item 10, which is a continued public hearing from September 17th, 2024, for the Blayden Subdivision. We will continue this public hearing with staff comments. Allen: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Members of the Council. The next application before you is a request for annexation and zoning, preliminary plat and a conditional use permit. This property consists of 35.29 acres of land. It's zoned RUT in Ada county and is located off of the southwest corner of North Black Cat Road and West Chinden Boulevard, State Highway 20-26. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map designation on this property -- the northern 25 acres of land is mixed-use, southern ten acres is medium density residential. The applicant is requesting to be allowed to use the abutting mixed-use regional future land use designation on 50 percent of the medium density residential designated area. The Comprehensive Plan allows for such requests when determined appropriate and approved as part of a public hearing with a land development application. The applicant believes this extension of the MUR designation on five of the ten acres of medium density designated land will allow for an ideal and suitable mix of commercial near major transportation arterials. The applicant Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 46 of 74 requests annexation of 38.58 acres of land with 5.9 acres of R-8, 1.83 acres of R-15, 16.71 acres of R-40 and 14.15 acres of C-G zoning for the development of 312 multi- family apartment units, ten townhome units and four commercial lots. A holding area is proposed on the southern part of the annexation area for future development. A portion of this area is where the applicant requests mixed-use regional future land use map designation is extended with C-G zoning for future development of a mid-box retail building and an office park as shown on the revised concept plan. This is not the revised concept plan. These -- these two uses swapped places, basically, on this map. So, the mid box is next to Black Cat in the office is internal to the development. For some reason it didn't update on my presentation. Staff is recommending a change to the zoning in this area consistent with the revised concept plan. A preliminary plat is proposed for 15 building lots consisting of one multi-family lot, ten townhouse lots and four commercial lots. Seven common lots, one driveway parking lot and three other lots for future resubdivision and development consisting of one commercial and two single family residential lots on 35.29 acres of land in the R-8, R-15, R-40 and C-G zoning districts. The subdivision is proposed to develop in five phases with the multi-family residential development and townhomes in the first two phases. The commercial on the north side of Ramblin in the third phase. The commercial and the holding area on the south side of Ramblin in the fourth phase and the single family residential in the holding area in the last phase. In order to ensure some services are available for the proposed residents in this area prior to full build out of the residential area staff had recommended a change to the phasing plan to swap phases two and three. The applicant did submit a revised phasing plan which swaps phases one and two and includes the extension of Ramblin Drive west to Rustic Oak, but the commercial portion is still shown as phase three. All of the existing homes and accessory structures and access driveways to Chinden, Black Cat and Larry Lane will be removed prior to development of the phase in which they are located. Access is proposed via one new collector street, Ramblin Drive, in accord with the master street map. Ramblin will run parallel with Chinden and is proposed to be extended west to Rustic Oak with the first phase of development. An emergency access is no longer needed from Chinden with the extension of Ramblin to Rustic Oak and should be removed. Ramble will function as a backage road providing connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway in this area. ACHD is requiring a southbound right-turn lane on Black Cat at Ramblin and Black Cat Road intersection. A traffic signal is planned at the Rustic Oak-Chinden intersection for safe access to the state highway. Cross-access ingress-egress easements are required to be granted to the out parcel at the northeast corner of the site for future access and interconnectivity. A 35 foot wide street buffer is required along Chinden and Black Cat, both entryway corridors, and a 20 foot wide buffer is required along Ramblin, a collector street, landscaped in accord with UDC standards. Noise abatement in the form of a four foot tall berm with a six foot tall concrete modulated wall on top of the berm is proposed at the back edge of the street buffer along Chinden as required for residential uses adjoining a state highway. A ten foot wide detached multi-use pathway exists within the buffer along Chinden. A ten foot wide detached pathway is required within the buffer along Black Cat as proposed in accord the pathways master plan and a ten foot wide pathway is proposed along the collector street for pedestrian safety. The existing trees that will be removed from the site require mitigation in accord with UDC standards. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 47 of 74 Concept elevations were submitted for their proposed townhomes as shown. Concept plans were not submitted for the future commercial buildings. All structures, except for the single family residential detached homes, are required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. A conditional use permit is proposed for a multi-family development consisting of 312 dwelling units on 16.7 acres of land in the R-40 zoning district. A mix of one, two and three bedroom units are proposed in 16 three story buildings. Three different building floor plans are proposed as follows. Four of Type A containing -- containing a total of 30 units each, four of Type B containing a total of 24 units each and eight Type C containing a total of 12 units each. As previously mentioned the multi-family residential development is proposed to be constructed in two phases. The UDC requires common open space to be provided in each phase of development consistent with the requirements for the size and the number of dwelling units. Two driveway accesses from Ramblin are proposed along the southern boundary of the site. Internal private streets are required to be provided for addressing purposes. Compliance with the specific use standards in the UDC for multi-family residential developments is required, which include private open space, common open space, site amenities, parking and landscaping among other things. A minimum of 80 square feet of private usable open space is required for each unit, 82 square feet is proposed exceeding the standard. Based on the area of the site and the square footage of the proposed units, a minimum of 3.46 acres of common open space is required to be provided with the development. A total of 3.58 acres is proposed exceeding the standard, consisting of half the street buffer along Chinden, a dog park, common area where a clubhouse, swimming pool and tot lot are proposed and linear open space that meets and exceeds the minimum area standards. Staff recommended revisions to the site plan prior to the Council hearing for the common areas proposed along the southern boundary where the dog park, clubhouse and swimming pool and tot lot are located along the collector street to be relocated to a more central location within the development accessible by pathways for convenient access and more visibility of these areas from the multi-family units in accord with the open space and CPTED standards. However, the applicant declined to make these changes and requests Council approval as submitted. Those common areas are located right here if you can see my cursor. Ramblin is directly to the south here. The number of site amenities required for the development is based on the size and the number of units of the multi-family development. For developments with more than 100 units, such as this, the decision making body shall require additional amenities beyond the required four for developments with 75 units or more to measure it to the size of the proposed development with at least one from each category, i.e., the quality of life, open space, recreation and multi-modal categories. The following amenities are proposed from each of the following categories. From the quality of life a clubhouse, which includes a fitness facility and dog wash station and a dog park with a waste station is proposed. From the open space category four community garden areas, plazas, and five picnic areas, including tables, benches and landscaping and a shade structure are proposed. From the recreation category swimming pool, a children's play structure and tot lot. Walking trails. Pathways. And from the multi-modal category bicycle repair station and enclosed bicycle storage in the clubhouse. Staff is of the opinion the proposed amenities meet and exceed the standards. Off-street parking is proposed in excess of UDC standards. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 48 of 74 A minimum of 679 spaces are required, including guest parking and covered spaces. A total of 693 spaces are proposed. Bicycle parking is also proposed for each building and the clubhouse in excess of the minimum standards. Conceptual elevations and perspective drawings of views from Chinden were submitted for the multi-family structures as shown. The Commission did recommend denial of this project to City Council and I will go through a summary of the Commission hearing. David Bailey, Bailey Engineering, the applicant's representative, testified in favor. The following folks testified in opposition. Wade Ramsey, Bainbridge Subdivision HOA president. Matt Neukom. Mark Blocovich. Kirsten Chidester. Don Brown and Greg Taylor. Written testimony was received from Matt and Ashley Neukom and John Bartlett, the 3rd, and Vicki Bartlett. Brooke Nielsen. Wade Ramsey. Again the Bainbridge Subdivision HOA president and Stephanie Labatista. Key issues of public testimony were as follows: Opposition to the project based on the development requirements in the CC&Rs for Compton Subdivision No. 2, which require minimum one acre lot sizes within the subdivision among other things. Opposed to the proposed multi-family development due to overcapacity of various schools and traffic flow in this area not able to accommodate so much housing. Concern pertaining to traffic cut through through Bainbridge Subdivision to the commercial uses to the east on Ten Mile Road. Southbound traffic on Black Cat Road and congestion during peak hours. Request for a traffic signal or a roundabout to alleviate congestion. Concern pertaining to safety of children traveling to the nearby elementary school with construction of sidewalks on this property, but no sidewalk along Black Cat Road for approximately 500 feet in between the subject property in the school. The Bainbridge HOA board representing its homeowners opposes this project until infrastructure improvements are made to accommodate the proposed development and, finally, opposed to the development due to the negative impacts on the quality of life of residents in the Trilogy Subdivision to the east due to increased traffic volumes and speeds and associated safety hazards for children who live in the area. Noise congestion and increased activity in the area. Preference for this area to develop was solely residential uses rather than mixed-use with commercial and desire for commercial uses to be provided further to the west. Key issues of discussion by the Commission. Opinion that the existing infrastructure, i.e., roads and schools, can't accommodate the proposed development. Black Cat Road won't be widened until 2036 to 2040 and the Black Cat-McMillan roundabout isn't scheduled until 2028. Relocation of the common open space located along Ramblin Drive where the dog park, clubhouse and swimming pool and tot lot is located to a more central integrated location within the multi-family development as recommended by staff. The Commission again recommended denial of the project due to the proposed density putting too much burden on current infrastructure and the site plan not supporting integrated common open space within the multi-family development. Outstanding issue for Council tonight. A revised phasing plan was submitted that swaps the two phases, phases one and two of the multi-family development, and includes the construction of Ramblin Drive to the west to Rustic Oak. As I mentioned earlier staff had recommended that phases two and three be swapped to ensure some services are available to serve the proposed residents in this area. As proposed all of the multi- family will develop prior to any of the commercial uses. There have been many letters Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 49 of 74 of testimony submitted since the Commission hearing that are included in the public record. The applicant is here to present tonight. Staff will stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you, Sonya. Council, any questions for staff? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Sonya, can you tell me what types of housing are permitted under R-40? We are seeking a CUP for the multi-family, but can you just walk me through the different types of allowable housing uses in an R-40? Allen: Yes. I believe multi-family is the only allowed housing in R-40, but let me double check. Actually, I'm mistaken. Single family attached dwellings are permitted. Taylor: That would be like a townhouse if it's -- a detached. So, that's just a regular single -- Allen: Two attached units. Taylor: Okay. So, multi-family is allowed with a conditional use permit? Allen: Yes. Taylor: And then -- Allen: Single family attached dwelling are permitted. Taylor: Okay. Allen: Permitted in the district. Single family detached dwellings -- looks like are either accessory or conditional use permit. Townhome dwellings are conditional use permit. Family duplex dwellings are conditional use permit. Taylor: Mr. Mayor, if I -- Allen: Vertically integrated residential projects are conditional use permit. Taylor: Can you just dig in just a little bit more for me. Like what's principally an R-40 use for generally? Is it for residential primarily or are there other uses in R-40? Allen: Typically it's higher density residential, but it -- as I noted those -- those uses are allowed as well? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 50 of 74 Simison: Counsel, any additional questions for staff? Okay. Would the applicant like to come forward? Bailey: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, Council Members. My name is David Bailey. I'm with Bailey Engineering representing Trilogy. Office address is 1119 East State Street in Eagle. Thanks again to Sonya for the presentation there and ready to get started here. How do I get that -- okay. Thank you. I'm not as skilled as Jon is keeping track of the timer, so I got to watch closely here. And, then, I am going to do a short presentation, then, we have our architect here. We will be within the 15 minutes to show the -- the details on the -- on the apartment, so -- okay. So, we are here for the Blayden Subdivision. I have got this started out with -- with an overview on the project and -- and Sonya did a great job at -- at overview and what the project is and we are talking about 312 apartment units. We are talking about ten single family townhomes attached single family uses. Oh, yeah. And, then, we are talking about a commercial that includes a -- two office buildings and potentially a daycare in one of them and, then, a coffee shop and, then, we are talking about an area that we don't know what we are going to do with -- on the C-G zone, but we know it's MURG. We want to reserve that. We have got a conceptual plan that we think works in that range and, then, we have some single family residential in -- in what we are calling the holding area on the property. So, we -- we have started working on the property about four or five years ago. Started working on this and we had several iterations as we went through and dealing with the issues with this and when we started on it then the property and the surrounding area just wasn't mature to get us to where we needed to go and what property can be included in it and how that was going to work was just not clear to us. So, we have been through a bunch of iterations and we -- we think we have got it to the right place now. The final iteration being timing following the city -- the Planning and Zoning hearing. So, I will just jump right into that. Here is that the -- the -- I don't know if that shows up if I do that mouse on there. Nope. So, the Planning and Zoning Commission, as Sonya said, recommended denial and that was primarily based, from my understanding, on the traffic on Ten Mile Road that would come from this project in advance of the improvements that could be done out there and so we had initially proposed to -- to build half of the street in front of the school in order to do our next -- our second phase of the apartments here, but with the traffic and the timing on there we see that the right answer here is to build Ramblin Road to -- it used to be called Levi Lane, now it's Rustic Avenue, which is currently constructed out to Chinden. The traffic signal is scheduled and I think designed. They are just waiting to figure out how to get that paved and get that built, along with the Highway 21 -- Highway 16 improvements to the west of here. So, before this project would ever go we are going to have that Levi Lane, Rustic Oak out there with a fully operational traffic signal at that end of the project. So, what we are proposing now is to build that entire road out to Rustic Oak in our first phase and not connect to Ten Mile at all in the first phase. So, we still would need the -- and that's what we are showing in our phasing plan that that connection of Ramblin to Ten Mile Road would be in phase two. So, what that gives us the timing on -- Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 51 of 74 Simison: Mr. Bailey, I just want -- I think it's Black Cat that you are referencing just so you get the record straight. Bailey: Yes. Yes. I'm sorry. Thank you very much, Mr. Mayor. So, not connecting to Black Cat Road until we would start on the second phase of the project and that still would require that the -- the temporary emergency access to Chinden Boulevard at the north end of that first phase. So, what that gives us is a project that can now move forward and -- and -- and start in next year or start construction on the site a year from now and have that build out and, then, we wouldn't start construction on the site on the phase two and make any connection to Black Cat until the roundabout at Black Cat and McMillan is constructed. The right of way acquisition in 2027. It's in the CIP. I think it's in the five year work plan. Yeah. It's in the five year work plan at this point. Construction in 2028 and, then, on Black Cat Road we would be, of course, widening along our frontage. We would provide all the sidewalk along our frontage there. And, then, we would provide a right turn lane into the site coming south on Black Cat Road into the site and, then, there is an ITD condition which we would follow, which would provide an additional right turn lane from Black Cat onto Chinden at the intersection up there. So, we spent quite a bit of time primarily talking to Ada County Highway District and the school district associated with these issues. So, we have gone to the school district. We talked with Dave Reinhardt there. Put together an agreement for them to actually allow us to build that entire road across their property and there is a section of ground that was left out of Prescott Ridge that wasn't improved. We will be building that as well. And so the right of way is available. We have an agreement with the school district in order to build that right of way and we can build that entire road out to -- out to Rustic Oak and we think that gives us a great way forward on the -- on the project here. ACHD -- we said, hey, how do we get Black Cat improvements moved up? What do we do on this end? How does that work? How does that end? Our traffic study said that that's where it sits on this 2036 to 2040 improvement on making five lanes out of Black Cat. That doesn't mean that we don't have a wider road along our frontage to the south of here it is. There is certainly some restrictions. But the traffic numbers just don't get ACHD to build those -- that road. If those change -- that -- that plan can change as well. But that's currently their take on that end of it. It's my impression, our traffic engineer's impression and ACHD's impression that this road is adequate to handle the traffic from the surrounding area and this in the straight segment of this road until those improvements are made and this would not have a significant negative impact. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Bailey: Excuse me? Cavener: I'm sorry, I don't mean to interrupt, Mr. Bailey. I just -- I'm trying to get some clarification on this piece and I think it's important. So, maybe we can stop this clock. Mr. Bailey's saying that -- that the roads can handle it, but we have got a level of service rating F from ACHD. So, I guess, Mr. Bailey, if you just wanted to maybe address that now, help me understand how you can say that the roadways can handle it when we have got an ACHD staff report that says level F. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 52 of 74 Bailey: I'm sorry, I don't understand what condition in the ACHD staff report that says that it can't handle it. It says that there is an -- there is a level of service of the intersection on Black Cat to Chinden. Is that what you are referring to? Cavener: At -- at McMillan. That intersection is operating at a level of Service F and is exceeding ACHD minimum operational thresholds during the p.m. peak hour. It's highlighted in blue. It's their most up-to-date staff report. Bailey: So, that is corrected with the build -- the construction of a roundabout at McMillan and Black Cat in 2028, which we don't intend to add traffic to that -- to Black Cat prior to that construction of that roundabout and that's a -- you know, it's not a condition of the staff report, but we are -- we are setting our phases up and accepting that as a condition that we won't add traffic to Black Cat until the roundabout is constructed at Black Cat and McMillan. The southbound right turn lane from Black Cat into our site is constructed and a right turn lane from our site onto Chinden going east is constructed. Cavener: Okay. Thank you. Bailey: Thank you. I'm going to get done quickly here, because I want to cover a couple of our topics. So, we have an agreement with the -- with the school and we have gone to the highway district and talked to them about the improvements that are required and we are willing to do all the improvements that are required to make sure that we don't have this huge negative impact on -- on Black Cat and we don't have especially a left turn motion. So, I will throw out here a little more. I think I got about two minutes before I'm going to run out of time. I got to get our architect up here. Ramblin Road is the -- is the collector street that's required per your master street map and that puts some severe restrictions on the suitability of this site for a big box and so we have looked at what we can do with the site, which was what we would expect in an MUR zone and so we have tried to follow the cut sheet and we looked through a lot of stuff. We have gone to the -- to the realtors and had them reach out to a variety of uses. I have laid out every kind of project that you can put on here, whether it be a Home Depot or a Target or a Walgreens or any of the mid boxes and we can accommodate those. We have had some discussions with Ms. Sexton, who owns the corner property to the northeast here and that may be available to combine into this to -- make it a bigger site at some point. But what we are doing is we are preserving that area into the future, so that it can be done. We are committed to building in the second phase the plaza, which is required by the cut sheet and we have some really great presentations on how nice of a central plaza this will be once we have the residential and the commercial build and, then, the -- the multi-family has its own open space and -- and area that it uses to the -- to the west there within the project. I will just set in a second, too. So, we think that the layout this sits really well. The ten acres to the south is restricted to no development of -- of lots less than one -- less than one acre on this and our plan does not violate that. We don't plan to plat any of that area until such time as that gets resolved. We don't know how long that takes or what it does, but we need to do something with -- with this -- the rest of this property, make this a coordinated Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 53 of 74 project, reserve this area into the future and that's what we -- we propose to do here. We don't intend to violate those CC&Rs with respect to that. As to the -- as to the location of the clubhouse and the pool, this is another issue that we have talked to the school district about and said, hey, what would you rather see across from your future middle school? And they are going to build on that site according to Mr. Reinhardt with the school district. We spent some time with them. See the apartments there or see the clubhouse there. The reason we put it there it's centrally located, it's in the middle of the site, it will provide great access from everybody there, gets it -- and it gives us some separation between the collector and our residents within there. But we are not going to die on that hill. If you really think we got to put it in the middle of the -- of the buildings up there I can do that. It doesn't affect our density or what we do on that at all. We think that's the appropriate place commercially for our -- our clubhouse and our -- our thing to be located. But, again, not going to die on that hill. We also have a great element in keeping this off of Chinden is that we have got the significant buffer area there from Chinden. We will have a berm out there and we will show you some presentation of that and we have these buildings set back across a parking lot from there. So, our residents are going to be far enough from Chinden that -- that they aren't an eyesore for Chinden and also are not, you know, a problem for our residents and we, of course, have to have the berm with the fence that creates our sound barrier along the north boundary there. I'm going to step aside my time here and see if we can get Henry to come up here and show you his presentation. Prendergast: Thank you, Mr. Mayor, City Council Members. My name is Henry Prendergast. I'm a senior project manager at Cole Architects. My address is 2501 West Pleasanton, Boise, Idaho. 83702. 1 believe the point here I can speak specifically to the buildings on the site particularly the aesthetics. I'm assuming there will be a design review in the future where we will go over a lot of this again. Sonya covered a lot of the bases with building types. Again, 312 units across 16 buildings, a mix of three bedroom, two and one spread across roughly 16 acres. Have in a presentation some building elevations perspectives to kind of show -- I have a flash drive. Does that work? No, you are good. You are good. Parsons: Mayor and Council, while Sonya is pulling that up I just wanted to let you know that they actually -- the roundabout at McMillan and Black Cat actually's been bumped another -- to another year. So, it's 2029 now. It just was recently updated by ACHD. Just wanted to share that for you. I'm looking at their map online. I see they finally updated their map, so it's -- it's pushed out another year. Prendergast: Great. Maybe I didn't put it on the flash drive, so we are good. Yeah. can run through -- this is kind of a large entitlement package here and, again, a lot of this we will probably go through at a later time if -- if presumably there is a design review for this project. Again, focusing on the B request, conditional use of the multi- family and moving through, again, not to get too far in the weeds of things like unit plans, that's a little further along, but, again, we have our breakdowns of the units in the project, our larger building floor plans. Again, a little more in detail at this point, but kind of seeing how we are going to break out those unit mixes across the three buildings, all Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 54 of 74 three floors, walk-ups with loaded corridors. But kind of want to move into the more kind of aesthetics and stuff that we kind of reviewed before. So, again, esthetically kind of looking -- we call it a mountain modern aesthetic, kind of a western aesthetic. We like kind of a simple design. Not a lot of modulation within the Meridian design standards, but something that's kind of simple and elegant, a kind of simple multi-family product. This is our 20 -- or 12 plex. Again three floors, 12 flex unit, different color schemes, which, again, is part of that design process to fit within the design standards of having a variety of color on the facades facing the separate roads on the project. So, the way that's spread out on that kind of site plan we saw before should fit into that kind of design criteria. This is our 30 plex. Again we have entrances on each side and, then, kind of an open corridor down the center. Again different color schemes and, then, looking at our site plans here, again, we covered some of this. Kind of looking probably primarily at the amenity space, which is what's going to be important beyond parking counts and things like that, which we have reviewed. Again, having a kind of a -- a good amount of amenity space in the project. Walking paths. Dog parks. A lot of excessive green space. Plaza areas. Kind of a large clubhouse area. These are all kind of things we put in. I think are important to us to kind of work into the project over this process. That's what these are kind of showing each one of these spaces. Community gardens. Picnic areas. Plaza courtyards. Pretty large dog park to the southwest of the site. Again, these are precedents and not necessarily need to look at those right now and -- and kind of we can get into that later and just kind of to focus on the concept perspectives. Again looking at different sides. These are your kind of broader angles. Looking westbound down Chinden you kind of have that large buffer which we think is nice to give some space. Original design was a lot closer. We pulled that back to kind of create more of a bike path and something that has a little more access and could be used in kind of a medium sense. Eastbound -- this is kind of the western approach coming from Ramblin, so this is looking at the dog park and kind of through to the buildings. Again, a lot of trees, a lot of green space, a lot of walkability was important to us. General view of the dog park. Kind of looking out towards Ramblin. So, this is the plaza to the east and, again, this kind of sits just outside the property line and connects it to that commercial space to the east. So, again, how that's kind of developed, you know, what -- we will kind of see. But I think for the residents and the multi-family residents this will be an important area, a connective tissue to the eastern area, the commercial area, and try to get through some of these. Time might be up there, but trying to move -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: In light of some of the technical challenges and so forth, I would love to ask a question to tell me more, please, for two minutes. Prendergast: Absolutely. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 55 of 74 Simison: And we did stop the timer for them, but -- yes. You have got two more minutes to answer questions. Prendergast: Thank you. Yeah. We will -- just a step back. Again, David mentioned this area, the plaza, which I think was an important area to us to kind of centralize the residential and the commercial and be kind of a connective area for the residents as that eastern area develops north of Ramblin. A few more shots through that plaza kind of show how it's pedestrian friendly. There is a lot of movement. The seating area is kind of built into structures, built into landscape elements. Again more shots through that plaza and, then, looking kind of on that southern corridor, looking north this is the area that, again, potentially up in the air as far as putting your amenity and green space to the south or in kind of more in the development and so this is looking south where you have a lot of park space, pools, dog parks looking north. Again, it kind of buffers that multi-family from the southern parcels, however they get developed looking north, be it a school or whatever else. Again, I think it provides kind of a nice block and a nice area to kind of have that circulation from the south to the north, where we presume there will be a lot of pedestrian traffic. These are a few more pathways kind of showing the green space between the buildings. Again, trying to break up that density as much as we can get. More green space, more picnic areas within kind of the apartments themselves and here is kind of a covered garden plaza area as well. I think more kind of shots of the interior, but I think that's pretty much the perspectives there. Yeah. So, can kind of yield to any questions you guys have about the buildings or the site. Simison: Thank you. Council, any questions for the applicant? Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: I have got several, but I will just start off with a couple. It's either Wayne or David. Is there security that would prevent public safety personnel from getting to these units? What I mean is we have had some developments that were built where our public safety personnel were stuck at a gate and could not get to the front doors of apartments. Is there any type of security preventing our public safety personnel from getting to the doors of these units if they are coming and responding? Bailey: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Overton, we don't -- we don't have any proposed, you know, access restrictions to the site. It would be like most apartment complexes you can drive in and out, so -- so, assume that the -- the clubhouse will be locked up and not attended, you know, but -- but as far as the buildings there -- there is no gates or any -- any restrictions to access and the site plan has been reviewed by the fire department as part of what we looked at here and we believe we meet all the -- the fire access standards for it. Overton: Mr. Mayor, follow up? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 56 of 74 Simison: Councilman Overton. Bailey: Mr. Mayor -- I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Go ahead. Overton: Just a quick follow up. I got a little concerned when I see a CPTED standard and you didn't initially want to comply with it. I'm assuming it's because you wanted to have those amenities open to the school, not within your development. Bailey: I'm sorry, I didn't quite understand the question. I apologize, I can't hear very well. Overton: As staff was speaking they asked that you move the clubhouse, swimming pool and tot lot to a more central area within your development to meet both the open space and CPTED standards -- CPTED being Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design and, again, could you go through that one more time for me? Bailey: Yes. Mr. Mayor, Council Member Overton, so I don't understand about the -- the -- the -- I do understand the standards that you are talking about, but in this case this actually has the ability to see this all from a -- from a public street. So, I'm not sure how that -- those standards are not being complied with with what we are doing; right? So, think we are meeting those safety standards. I don't understand the -- the staff comment as it relates to that point. As it relates to -- there are standards in there that said that the -- the clubhouse and pool and common area should be centrally located within -- within the apartment complex and we looked at that and we are in the middle of the apartment complex, we are just not in the very center. So, we are east-west centered within the apartment complex and as a business decision the owner said I would rather have those things easily accessible still by all the apartments -- we are talking 15 acres. So, the walking distance, you know, would be a little longer for the piece of people at the north end, but that we would have, then, that buffer between the collector street and the school to the apartment units. That said, you know, if there is a requirement that we put it in the geometric center of the apartment complex we will we will comply with that. We just don't think it's the best thing for our project as far as and -- and for the -- for the -- for our tenants in the long run to have that needed in the middle of the project instead about there, you know, because the leasing offices will be in there and as well as all that use space, so -- and we do have significant open space within the project itself and might go through things kind of quickly, but -- but we do have -- those plaza areas are significant wide areas. The garden areas are significant wide areas. Then we have extra space between the buildings behind that are landscaped and pathways and that -- that are really, you know, usable open space between the buildings behind them that we think are a great amenity. They also provide that -- that walking pathway all the way around and through -- you know, through all of the buildings for the -- for the whole apartment complex. So, we like the open space where it is, but, as I said before, we are not going to die on that hill. If there is some specific requirements it says it's got to be here then -- then we will comply. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 57 of 74 Simison: If I can follow up on what -- where are the pathways go between the buildings? It's kind of a rhetorical question. They don't go to -- they don't go to the clubhouse, they don't go to the dog park, they don't go to -- they just go between buildings. You know, they connect the buildings, but they don't go to amenities, at least not from what I saw. You know, maybe could take you to the parking lot, you know, the one in the middle, but they don't really connect in my opinion to the design of the -- of the facilities. Bailey: If I can get a map up I will show you what we intended with that, Mr. Mayor. While he's doing that if I could just take a quick second for a list, Mr. Mayor? That I was going to close with is that we had five recommendations in the staff report of things that we should change on here. One is the switch to mid box and the office locations back and forth to put the mid box closer to Black Cat Road, which we have complied with. Relocate the plaza in the holding area, so that it's in a better spot for the future. We will actually have two plazas. We are going to build one with phase two and another one would be built when the -- when the commercial portion is built out. Submit the details for the plaza, which we have had some great details on what we are going to do on that first plaza with that and we think that's a great thing and it says submit new legal description for C-G and L-O and what that's referring to is we are not going to have the C-G zone go all the way out to that road and the holding area. We would actually zone those areas as L-O, so we get that transition per your comp plan which says the C-G area office use across the road, residential use, other, you know, off site of the property there and the one component that we just discussed was relocating the clubhouse, pool, dog park within the development, which I just discussed our reasoning on that. Okay. So, Mr. Mayor, as to your question there -- so, we are showing these pathways that go -- that this one goes down here to the dog park. This pathway goes all the way around the outside of the project through this way, connects back through here and to this pathway. So, we are connecting -- these are the plazas, these are the garden areas here and these are the larger plazas that we have there that have significant, you know, gathering space within those and, then, these north-south pathways and, yes, you do have to cross -- the -- the sidewalk -- or cross the parking lot to get to the clubhouse from these. So, from this area here this unit would go this way, down across this way and across to the clubhouse and pool at this end. Same thing from this direction. You go down this direction or down -- down here to the dog path in there. So, we -- we felt that we provided that connectivity to crisscross and go back and forth and fully around the entire apartments here and that was our intent. If we were to move this to the center, if that were a requirement, we could move this to the center of the site and have apartment buildings down here along the road and, then, that would -- I mean it would lay out as well, we just think it's a -- we just think it's -- it's -- it's the way our tenants will really enjoy the property and it's an efficient way to -- to -- to lay the property out as well. So, that's why we said it that way. But we were very intentional about this is a new product, we are pretty excited about it, about the spacing between them, about the spacing from Chinden, about the spacing from the collector street and about the circulation within the site and, then, the plaza area that we have to the east here, I think the actual square footage of it is -- is bigger than the Generations Plaza in Meridian here, for exemplary scale size and it will connect the apartments to the future Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 58 of 74 commercial and in phase two we are committed to building the two buildings to the north, which would be office and/or retail buildings and, then, we will provide and try to find a tenant for a coffee shop here, which would provide services to the neighbors here. We have had interest from a party who want -- who would like to build a daycare in this area, which we think would be a great use. Those would all be available in phase two and, then, we would still have significant area to the east to meet the city's R-U goals of having a larger, you know, draw use in this area and the office space to do the same thing. Simison: Okay. Council, any additional questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Just a quick one. You made a comment that you are not going to add traffic to Black Cat. I am not tracking on how that is true. Yeah. I just want to give you an opportunity to explain your comment. Bailey: Thank you. Strader: In detail if you could point to phasing and roadways on this map that would be helpful. Bailey: Council Member Strader, so the initial plan is that we will build the -- we will build the -- the western half of the apartments and the dog park and the clubhouse, pool area and, then, we will build Ramblin Road from -- from there to the west out to Rustic Oak and, then, Rustic Oak will provide traffic for the entire first phase to -- until such time as the roundabout is built on Black Cat. So, we wouldn't do phase two unless -- and, then, phase two is when we rebuild the remaining portion of Ramblin to Black Cat. So, we are going to build the western phase of this and there is going to be a delay before we would move to the eastern portion of this and move there until Black Cat is sufficient to -- to handle the traffic from this. So, eventually, we will put traffic on -- on Black Cat, yes. But it won't be until the roundabout is built. We have a right turn lane from Black Cat onto -- onto Chinden at the north end, which is scheduled to provide sufficient traffic for this and as far as the 2029 issue on the roundabout, is that we won't put traffic on there until the roundabout's built would be our -- our condition on that and -- Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Yeah. I'm having a hard time tracking with that, because you may be directing traffic onto Rustic Oak, but there is nothing that -- just human behavior, there is nothing that is preventing someone from turning on to Chinden and taking a right turn onto Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 59 of 74 Black Cat; right? I mean explain to me your rationale of how Black Cat would be entirely avoided. I'm not following that at all. You may not be connecting directly to Black Cat until your later phases, but you are still adding a significant amount of traffic indirectly to Black Cat. It may not be directly, but I don't understand how you are not -- how you are avoiding that. Bailey: From here would go to Rustic Oak, Chinden and, then, come back and turn right on Black Cat. Strader: Potentially. I mean that -- that's one avenue they could take. I mean I could think of a few different ones. I mean they may go down -- you don't have a map in front of me that shows where Rustic Oak connects, but I don't understand why someone wouldn't, you know, follow that down and, then, eventually go back onto Black Cat. I'm just -- I'm kind of struggling with your -- your argument on that. So, all -- I have heard your -- your thought process and I guess I will try to digest it during the meeting. I do have another question, which is -- yeah, I have a lot of trepidation about moving forward on this without something identified for the hard corner. Would that at least be connected to all of the city utilities and during what phase and -- and -- and where is that at? And I will just preface this by saying I have a very high bar for annexation in general. Like I feel like this is the time where the city has the most discretion in terms of, you know, setting an appropriately high bar and so I just -- I just want to be frank, I'm unsurprising, right, we have had a recommendation for denial from both Planning and Zoning and, then, city staff has a number of concerns. I think you -- you received feedback and you had an opportunity to make changes to maybe, you know, centralize your open space, et cetera, but with the level of service on Black Cat and the timing, unless you can like really articulate to me how you are not going to add traffic to Black Hat, I'm just -- I'm struggling. If you want to take another crack at that, but -- Bailey: May I? Strader: Please. Bailey: Mr. Mayor and Council Member Strader, so our -- our traffic analysis -- we are not going to connect traffic directly to Black Cat is -- is what I'm saying here. So, if someone decides they want to go out Levi Lane from any other project or this one and go onto Black Cat, we certainly have not considered that to be a significant impediment to the Black Cat traffic in -- in doing that. So, I don't know what those numbers are, but I don't think that we would add any appreciable noticeable traffic to Black Cat until such time as we connect Ramblin to Black Cat. That -- that's my point on that. Strader: But -- Mr. Mayor. You are -- you are seeking an annexation and an approval and entitlement for this whole project; right? So, there -- there is nothing from the city's perspective that prevents you from building out all of the phases of your project. So, I -- unless you are willing to restrict yourself in some way, which I don't think would make sense, I -- I just -- I don't understand how you are not adding traffic to Black Cat. I'm just not tracking with you. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 60 of 74 Bailey: We are willing restrict ourselves in saying that we will not add Black -- traffic to Black Cat until the roundabout at Black Cat and McMillan is constructed and the right turn lane from Black Cat onto Chinden is constructed. We wouldn't add traffic directly to Black Cat until those two things are constructed and we are willing to restrict our second phase development until those occur -- until those things happen, in which case the traffic study and ACHD analysis says that Black Cat can handle the traffic from this project. That -- that's the -- that's all we can get is what our traffic engineer and ACHD says we can do on that. As to the property in the northeast corner, we have provided a concept plan of what could be there, but as you know commercial development takes a very long time. We have to reserve the ground for it. It was over ten years before the Costco came in there and this site will -- will never be available to put a Costco in here or a Home Depot or a Target for that matter. The site doesn't fit it and we don't have the access, because there will never be a traffic signal at Ramblin and Black Cat on the site. So, we -- we can't expect to have that kind of use in the property and, to tell you the truth, we would rather limit that to a smaller amount, but we understand the city has a need under your Comprehensive Plan for us to provide a certain amount of reserved commercial space. We don't own the corner. Mrs. Sexton does. We have had discussions with her and we don't know what she's going to do and I can't predict that and I can't predict that I'm going to do that. But in the meantime we think that this is the end look of this site in the long run. So, we would like to come in here with a project and say this is consistent with a Comprehensive Plan, it's a good design and it's probably what's going to happen in the long run and it makes sense for the city and for us -- it provides a road for the school. It provides improvements to Black Cat and it provides a much needed backage road adjacent to Chinden, which the city has lost the opportunity for up and down Chinden on the east -- on the east side. Most of our roads are a quarter mile or a half mile south of Chinden. So, a backage road that provides a commercial area like this, separates -- gives great access to the school. This in the long run -- this site plan in the very long run makes sense. So, if -- you know, if your bar for annexation is that you want something more resolved, I don't think anything is going to get a whole lot more resolved on this site, except for we are eventually going to come up with a good user here that's going to meet the -- at least the local areas if need -- not some further areas need for that commercial and the office zone. The mid-box, whether it be a Walgreens or whether it be, you know, a Whole Foods or something that could fit in this site that would work great and the office and the retail that goes along with that is going to be great. In the meantime we are going to build some -- some commercial there. We are going to have some -- some places for people to work, probably a daycare, have a -- a coffee shop and this things already ready to go for everybody else. When the commercial gets there it gets there. The rest of this makes a whole lot of sense. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Strader: Thanks for answering my questions. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 61 of 74 Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Kind of along those lines -- you might have said it earlier, but on Levi Lane when it connects to Chinden, did you say there is a light planned to be there or -- and when would that be? Bailey: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Taylor, so there is a light planned for there. Its design is done. They are trying to get things paved and get that light put in this fall is the plan and Brighton's actually building that light -- is that correct? Yeah. Brighton's building the -- building the light there and, then, if not it will be in the spring. So, before we would ever move a tablespoon of dirt we are going to have a traffic signal at -- at Rustic Oak. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor, David, you had talked about putting sidewalk on Black Cat and one of our primary things has been kids having safe routes to school. Will that sidewalk get the kids all the way to the current elementary school or will they still have space that does not have a safe area for them to get -- walk to school? Bailey: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Roberts, I guess I got to ask a question is I'm not sure right off the bat which school we are talking about. Where is the location, Sonya? I think it's Pleasant View. Little Roberts: Pleasant View? Thank you. Pleasant View. Bailey: Which side of Black Cat is that, Sonya, do you know? Parsons: Yeah. The east side down Gondola. Gondola I believe is the road. Black Cat and Gondola. Bailey: So, they would have to cross Black Cat and I believe we talked to -- asked the school about this and those kids would ride a bus to school, as opposed to walk from here; is that correct? If they remember the exact thing on that. Simison: Anytime you cross an arterial it's not a walk zone. So, it is busing if that is the school that they would go to. Bailey: So, it's on the east side of Black Cat. That wouldn't be there. We are going to build our sidewalk along our frontage, of course, and -- and, in fact, a ten foot wide path and we are building a ten foot wide path along both sides of Ramblin when it's completed. So, we would have that ten foot detached pathway on both sides of that and along Black Cat with the regional pathway. Then that regional pathway actually goes up through our site and, then, continues along Chinden to the north end. So, we Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 62 of 74 are all -- making all those connections from that end and that would be great access to the school -- to the middle school when that that goes in there. Little Roberts: Great. Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Maybe -- maybe staying on the concept of -- of school. So, Mr. Bailey, I -- want you to know I like this idea that you are trying to bring of kind of micro community. I have got big concerns about the roads, but probably larger than that is the impact on schools. I think when you first applied for this project you had maybe -- I think it was just Pleasant View that was close to capacity. Now, with our full enrollment both the elementary, middle and high school are over their capacity before this project and since it sounds like you have had some good conversations with West Ada, particularly of the middle school, when is their plans to get that school built or did they share any of that with you? Bailey: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, so they don't have a specific date in mind to build that school, but they will build one there at some point and that's up to them when they are need. So, we pressed him on that issue as well, but we do have a letter of support from Ada county in the file -- or from -- from West Ada School District in the file saying that they can handle the -- the children from this and that's all we can do is say -- we say here is our project -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Bailey: -- and they say that they can -- they can accommodate the children from this development. Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: Yeah. Thanks. Mr. Bailey. I'm not aware of that -- of a letter of support. I am aware of a letter from -- from July that shows current enrollment for last year, but I'm not necessarily seeing something where they are in support of -- Simison: I think it is their standard letter that -- you know, they have never given us a letter that says they cannot accommodate. Cavener: Right. Simison: Because they don't need to have -- Cavener: Correct. But Mr. Mayor -- Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 63 of 74 Simison: -- in their opinion to do that. Cavener: -- I think the applicant is trying to -- to attest that the -- the West Ada has sent him a letter of support for this project and just like I have some concerns when the applicant states that our roads can handle this project, when we have got a staff report from ACHD that says level of service F, I want to make sure that the record's clear, West Ada has not put a letter in support. They have put a little better outlining what the student generation for this project would be, which is outdated based on current enrollment. Bailey: Mr. Mayor, Council Member Cavener, you know, I'm not sure what I can answer on that, because I can submit our project to the West Ada School District and they can send me a letter that says that here is what we have and that they are advising you that they are not objecting to this development based on school capacity. So, this letter does not say we object to this development based on school capacity, which is what we are talking about -- Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Bailey: -- for the project. And then -- Cavener: Mr. Bailey, I'm not going to go back and forth with you on this. It is not an accurate statement to say that you have support from West Ada on this project. You are correct, they have not objected, because they cannot, but I guess I would just caution you about your choice of language, because there has been a couple of times tonight that I have -- I have grown very cautious of how you have tried to phrase things that don't match the reality. So, I just -- I'm -- I'm going to caution you, sir, to be real careful how you couch support from different agencies within this valley, making sure that it accurately reflects the documentation they have provided us. Simison: Okay. Thank you. Council, any additional questions for the applicant? Okay. Let's get to the public testimony. Bailey: Thank you. Simison: Okay. Johnson: Mr. Mayor, Steve Elliott representing Bainbridge HOA. Simison: Good evening. Elliott: Good evening. I'm Steve Elliott. I reside at 4718 West Lost Rapid Street, Meridian. 83646. Obviously, in Bainbridge. I'm one of the two residents in our area that was affected by the 500 plus radius, so I have been all over this since it started and, to be honest, you all stole a lot of my thunder that I was going to talk about tonight, because you are asking the questions that -- that -- that I feel need -- that we as a board Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 64 of 74 feel needs to be answered and it's traffic and safety of our kids. That's the -- I wasn't aware and I must have missed it in the packet that they were going to punch Ramblin on through to the west and not develop on Black Cat, but Ms. Strader pointed out that they will go there and they will turn right -- turn right and go back down Black Cat that's the way to get here. Or even worse they will take Ramblin to Rustic Oak, turn left and go to the roundabout at McMillan and Rustic Oak, which is through -- I believe it's called The Oaks Subdivision, so that traffic is going to up at the Black Cat-McMillan intersection. We are not against development at all, because -- I mean we are in Bainbridge, it's a nearly a mile from Black Cat to Chinden. I don't know how many acres that is, but it's a lot. But the infrastructure -- we have -- we have been pounding that. We -- we have had -- this is the second in-person and we have had two written comments on it and, you know, the -- the -- the part about the sidewalk on Black Cat, everything I have seen is that's on the frontage of this project, south on Black Cat to Larry Lane where this project ends and from Larry Lane south to Vanderbilt -- West Vanderbilt, there is no sidewalk and there is no -- as far as I know a full entrance there and it's a very shallow roadway, there is not really even a shoulder there. I have walked it and they -- you know, obviously, they will bus kids and all that, but even if the -- the road doesn't get punched through to Black Cat, children are pretty smart, they are going to take the path of least resistance and they are going to cut cross-country, go through the forest and get onto the sidewalk at Vanderbilt and there is a controlled stoplight crosswalk at Black Cat and Gondola and it gets a lot of use. I drive that road every day and -- and there is a lot of use there. So, I just wanted to be here to talk about that, you know, I have lived in Meridian 33 years. I was rural fire commissioner and a football coach, an HOA board member for three years, so I do care about this stuff. I have got eight grandchildren that live in the area, so I am -- I am a hundred percent invested in this and I think it looks like a really neat project and some -- some great ideas, I just think it's too soon. Thank you. Simison: Okay. Council, any questions? Johnson: Mr. Mayor, Matt Neukom. Neukom: Good evening, Mr. Mayor, Council. My name is Neukom. I live at 5120 West Cherry Lane, Meridian, Idaho. 83646. My property is contiguous to the proposed development. It's in the southwest corner. If you look at the map on the screen it is right here where the mouse is. I represent my wife and 1, as well as our neighbors Jack and Vicki Bartlett and Bartletts live immediately across Larry Lane from the development right here. We submitted a letter to the city. It's on the development website. To ask you to object to the project. A reason for requesting that you object is -- is we have an agreement between property owners within the subdivision and within the CC&Rs for how development needs to take place. The developers and owner within the subdivision -- and they have agreed to those right -- they have agreed to those terms. We are definitely not asking you to adjudicate our agreement with them, but, essentially, it doesn't make sense to approve the subdivision. Mr. Bailey just mentioned the developer will respect the CC&Rs. So, this property that is labeled holding area commercial, if they elect to respect the CC&Rs, then, the Bartletts and our family or Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 65 of 74 whoever owns those properties will essentially have authority as to when that property can be developed and if they don't elect to respect the CC&Rs and we would -- we would anticipate a court would prohibit them from developing that property. So, I don't understand all the zoning requirements and all the annexation requirements, but I understand that this -- this property labeled holding area commercial is required for the -- for the development and, essentially, wouldn't be in the developer's authority to develop it if they either respect the CC&Rs or a court prohibits them from progressing. So, with that do you have any questions for me? I have included a couple of -- of letters and -- and are submitted to you from attorneys that demonstrate that case law is consistent with this approach. Simison: Council, any questions? Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Are you able to put a finer point on the exact area of this proposed development that overlaps with the Compton Subdivision CC&Rs? Neukom: Yes, it is the -- it is this line. So, if -- this mouse is slow to respond. It is this east-west line right here is in Compton Subdivision and it's everything to the south of that line. Strader: Thank you. Simison: Okay. Thank you very much. Neukom: Thank you. Johnson: And, Mr. Mayor, that is all the sign-ups we had. Simison: Is there anybody else present that would like -- if you would like to come on up. You are -- you are good. Don't -- not needed. Just state your name and address for the record, please. Myers: Mack Myers, Settlers Irrigation District, Boise, Idaho. So, this design is supplied water by Settlers Irrigation and it doesn't look like they have sufficient irrigation for the green space that you guys are requiring. Simison: Can you choose one of the mics. Myers: So, this design -- the -- the design for the irrigation setup is not adequate to supply irrigation to the green space that's required for a parcel of this size. So, typically something this size would have a pond and I think it's something that we need to work further on together and I was working with Kyle with -- on this stuff, but when you guys Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 66 of 74 have a requirement for a certain amount of green space per acre and we have to like work out the irrigation. This -- this irrigation design that is incorporated into this plan is not sufficient for this development. So, there is -- there is not a water supply that's adequate to keep all of this green space green the way it's currently designed. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: What was your name again? I'm sorry. Myers: Mack Myers. Strader: Mr. Myers, are you providing an opinion as a -- an employee or a member of the irrigation district, as a personal citizen with knowledge of these plans? Myers: As the district manager. Yeah. So, we review these plans -- Strader: Uh-huh. Myers: -- you know, from -- and these usually -- Trilogy, is that who did this? Okay. Yeah. So, typically -- and we have this on our website, so any plat or parcel that's within our district we have requirements on our website that are provided public knowledge for pressurized irrigation -- gravity irrigation -- for any kind of developments that are occurring when there is a land use change from agricultural to, you know, subdivided. Strader: Got it. Thank you. Myers: That's all I have. Simison: Council, any other questions? All right. Thank you. Is there anybody else present who would like to provide testimony at this time? And seeing nobody online, except for our staff, would the applicant to come forward to close? Bailey: Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Council. As to the point of Mr. Myers, we have -- we have met with the irrigation district, we have walked the site and we have a preliminary engineering report that shows we can provide the appropriate irrigation to the -- to the property and those would be detailed in the final development plans, which would be reviewed by the irrigation district as well. So, we meet all those requirements and we -- we planned to -- I don't have any further comments on the -- on the -- on the -- the questions Mr. Neukom. You know, we -- we have met with them. We just met with them last week -- with them and the Bartletts to the south there, talking about the property and what we intend to do with that and I guess just to summarize, again, you know, we think this is what's going to happen in the long run. This is what we would like to do with the property. We think it's very consistent with what you have. We would like to move forward with building the western half of the apartments and so we are asking for your Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 67 of 74 approval tonight and we don't intend to violate any of the capacity requirements of -- of the school or of the roads or do anything along those lines that is not going to work. So, we have the conditions of approval that we are -- we are -- we are great to abide with and, again, on moving the clubhouse within the site there, you know, we have -- I have -- I have explained, you know, what we would like to do with that and, again, if that was the -- the -- the will of the -- the Council that we -- we move that with inside there, that we would be happy to do that. So, we are -- we are asking you for approval and we think that this is -- you know, it's going to take a while, but we think that this request is timely in that we can get moving on this and we can build a portion of Ramblin and we can build a portion of the apartments and start moving forward on detailed plans to -- to build out the remainder of the project. Stand for any questions. Simison: Thank you. Bailey: Thank you. Simison: Council, any questions? Okay. Little Roberts: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Little Roberts. Little Roberts: I don't remember if it was Councilman Rountree or Councilman Bird, but I -- one quote that's running through my head with annexations is go slow and get it right. So, I am thinking that maybe we should discuss a continuance. We have got time to mull all of this information over and I know there is more questions floating around than what we need answered at 10:00 o'clock at night. Just a thought. Simison: Okay. Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Maybe just while we are sharing our thoughts, yeah, I -- I do think that the bar for annexation should be appropriately high and anytime that we annex and approve something I think we have to assume, you know, that the timing could be quick. We don't know what the timing will be. You know, that -- that's within the applicant's control, but at the time that we have approved something we are giving that the green light to move forward and I do think with annexation that sometimes the timing is just not appropriate and not in the best interest of the city and in this case I -- I have a pretty strong view, so I just want to be upfront with that. I thought that the Planning and Zoning Commission's rationale for denial was sound. I'm troubled by a few other things as well. I think that getting some sort of resolution on the CC&Rs with the Compton Subdivision would make sense for the applicant to do on their end before seeking approval. I agree that the open space is not appropriately located and that the Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 68 of 74 amenities need to be centralized. I'm troubled that the applicant didn't make those changes, but I -- I wouldn't direct them to do so if I'm not on board with approving this at this time. The lack of sidewalks on Black Cat is troubling. I think the -- the school capacity issue is troubling. I think particularly more troubling is the level of service on Black Cat and the timing of those improvements. I would love to have more clarity on what's happening with the corner lot and I -- I don't agree with the rationale that the applicant wouldn't be adding traffic to Black Cat by definition. When this project is fully built out it certainly will. I just have a -- kind of a gut realism generally, which is hate -- you know, adding a ton of housing in very close proximity to Chinden Road, you know, that troubles me. I could probably continue, but, yeah, I won't be in support of this request. So, I just wanted to be up front about that. For me a continuance, unless the applicant really wanted one, a continuance I don't think would change my mind. Simison: And I think that would be important before we go to a continuance is if -- if Council feels like there is a way for the applicant to get the yes in people's mind, then, absolutely, because I think that there are things that would need to be addressed, but if it's -- if they are not, then, let's not waste people's time and so I think that's -- maybe that's an important thing for everyone to contemplate is -- is there a way to yes for you on this project at this time or not. Overton: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Overton. Overton: Just to kind of echo the words of Council Woman Strader, I'm not in favor of this. There is -- there is just too many clear roadblocks to this happening. Even if these school-age children that were elementary students got into Pleasant View Elementary, that requires all of them driving on -- the parents driving on Black Cat Road. I think that's what we keep talking about and anybody who has been anywhere near an elementary school when they have a special event, which they do all the time in elementary school, those that we end up with a lot of traffic on the roads outside and that's going to be Black Cat Road. There is no way that this development goes in, even if you put all the traffic out on Chinden, that you are not impacting Black Cat. That just goes without saying. It may take them a little longer to get on to it, but they are going to find it. I have concerns about the commercial lot that we are really not talking about, because it doesn't sound like we can talk about. It doesn't sound like we are able to develop on it right now, because there is other rules of law in place. I looked in the file and, Mr. Myers, there is two letters with your name on it in the file attached, but, unfortunately, I don't see a letter stating what you testified here to tonight. So, I don't see anything from Settlers saying in the file that said anything was approved. It's another outstanding issue. There is -- there is just several. I'm going to let the -- the -- the fact that you didn't want to put the clubhouse and all the other amenities in the center as we like to see it. We don't do that because we are trying to harass a developer or harass a project. I was one of the first people to bring Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design to this city. One of the first officers certified in that. It's used across this country to try to make the safest developments we can and when staff Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 69 of 74 now brings that and codifies it and tries to bring those principles in, it's to help make those some of the safest projects in the city and -- and when I see that -- and I know you said you don't want to die on that hill, but just the kind of resistance and why you wanted to do it the way you wanted to do it that it doesn't give me the greatest level of confidence in what we are doing here tonight. So, I'm not in favor of a continuance. I'm -- I'm not in favor in this project moving forward at all. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council, I -- having read a 71 page staff report -- I think that's the biggest staff report since I have been on the Council. Having read all of the public testimony that was submitted and was part of the record and I had some real concerns coming into this hearing tonight about this project and I think Mr. Elliott summed it up. It's traffic and kids. And I don't think that this project clears the bar in alleviating those concerns that I had coming into this hearing. I like some of what is proposed and being discussed. I just -- I think it may be too early for prime time. It may end up looking like this some -- at some point down the road. But tonight I don't think that I'm in a position to move forward on approving this. So I would -- I would not be in support of continuing the hearing and think that we ought to make a decision tonight on whether it's a go or no go. Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: Yeah. I think Mr. Bailey makes a good point. I do think this is probably what's -- something like this is going to end up here. But this -- it does feel like one of the -- of all the projects I have considered there seems to be a lot of unanswered questions about it, too. I -- and not -- not to pile on too much, but I do think that -- I think the design is kind of poor, if I'm being honest. I think if I'm giving you good feedback, I think it's not very creative and so I -- usually I don't like to micromanage any of that stuff, but as far as feedback I think it -- I think you should consider carefully what Council's -- the other members of Council said today in terms of design. I think that's an important concept. But given the holding area, what we heard in testimony tonight with the irrigation district, there is a lot of unknowns that we can't answer and if you have been on Black Cat Road it's not very fun and I don't have a lot of confidence that ACHD is going to expedite any kind of investment in Black Cat Road anytime soon. So, I think that's a real -- real concern. If it was two lanes with a turn lane even, that's a little bit different than just -- just a lot of two lane through there. So, I agree, I think Council Woman Strader made a good point about the bar with annexation should be high for a good reason and I'm -- I agree with -- with the statements that have been said today. I think annexation for a project like this is just -- it's not quite there yet. I think probably we are going to see something pretty similar to this down the road, but I think it would be important to get the timing right, some of the other infrastructure investments that we need to kind of come Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 70 of 74 along I think need to happen. This valley is growing pretty fast, so I think you will see those things happen maybe sooner than later, but we just don't know that today when that will be, so I think -- I think a continuance probably isn't necessary tonight and I would probably not vote in support of this project tonight. Cavener: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Cavener. Cavener: I want to commend Council Member Little Roberts for at least asking the question. I -- I wasn't in support of this project and I didn't know if it's because it was 10:00 o'clock or it's because I had big questions and concerns about the project and certainly hearing from my -- my colleagues it confirmed that this project isn't -- doesn't meet our -- our standards for -- for Meridian right now. I just -- I do want to pass this along to the applicant. These micro community concepts I think are really intriguing and as a way to really foster like neighborly interactions in a multi-family environment. So, I don't want these types of concepts to go away. They just need to be executed much better. There is just too many thresholds we are being asked to overcome and -- and I'm certainly not in support of it. Simison: Okay. With that, Council -- Whitlock: Mr. Mayor, I believe -- I would move that we can close the public hearing on Agenda Item No. 10. Strader: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Is there any discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it and the public hearing is closed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Whitlock: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Whitlock. Whitlock: After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File No. H-2023-0043 as presented during the hearing of today's date. Overton: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to deny Item H-2023-0043. Is there discussion on the motion? If not, clerk will call the roll. Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 71 of 74 Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item to deny is approved. Which seems odd to say, but that's what it is, so -- thank you. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. ORDINANCES [Action Item] 11. Ordinance No. 24-2062: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-1-8, Concerning Preservation of Private Property Rights; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-1A-1, Concerning Adding New Definitions; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-2, Table 11-2A-2, Concerning Manufactured Homes Within a Residential District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-4, Table 11-2A-4, Concerning Dimensional Standards for the R-2 District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-5, Table 11-2A-5, Concerning Dimensional Standards for the R-4 District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-213-2, Table 11-213-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Commercial Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2C-2, Table 11-2C-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Industrial Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2D-2, Table 11-2D-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Traditional Neighborhood Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-3C-6, Table 11-3C-6, Concerning Dimensional Standards for Carports for Residential Use; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-9, Concerning Daycare Facilities; Adding Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-51, Concerning Food Truck Court Specific Use Standards; Adding Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-52, Concerning Food Truck Specific Use Standards; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-5A-6(D)(4), Concerning Proof of Posting; and Providing an effective date. Simison: Okay. With that we will move on to Item 11, which is Ordinance No. 24-2062. 1 will ask the clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. And apologies for the length. This is an ordinance amending UDC Code Section 11-1-8, concerning preservation of private property rights; amending UDC Code Section 11-1A-1, concerning adding new definitions; amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-2, Table 11-2A-2, concerning manufactured homes within a residential district; amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A- 4, Table 11-2A-4, concerning dimensional standards for the R-2 district; amending Section 11-2A-5, Table 11-2A-5, concerning dimensional standards for the R-4 district; Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 72 of 74 amending UDC Section 11-213-2, Table 11-213-2, concerning allowed uses in commercial districts; amending UDC Code Section 11-2C-2, Table 11-2C-2, concerning allowed uses in industrial districts; amending UDC Code Section 11-2D-2, Table 11-2D-2, concerning allowed Uses in TN-R districts; amending UDC Code Section 11-3C-6, Table 11-3C-6, concerning dimensional standards for carports for residential use; amending UDC Code Section 11-4-3-9, concerning daycare facilities; adding UDC Code Section 11-4-3-51, concerning food truck court -- food truck courts specific use standards; adding UDC Code Section 11-4-3-52, concerning food truck specific use standards; amending UDC Code Section 11-5A-6(D)(4), concerning proof of posting; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? If not, do I have a motion? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 24-2062. Overton: Second. Simison: Have a motion and a second approve Ordinance No. 24-2062. Is there any discussion? If not clerk will call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 12. Ordinance No. 24-2061: An Ordinance (Kilgore H-2023-0063) for rezone of a parcel of land located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Niday's Second Addition, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Plats at page 594, Ada County records, situate in the northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A," rezoning 0.34 acres of land from the R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) zoning district to the O-T (Old Town) zoning district in the Meridian City Code; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all applicable official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 73 of 74 Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date. Simison: Next item up is Item 12, which is Ordinance No. 24-2061. Ask the clerk to read this ordinance by title. Johnson: Thank you, Mr. Mayor. It's an ordinance related to Kilgore H-2023-0063 for rezone of a parcel of land located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Niday's Second Addition, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Plats at page 594, Ada county records, situate in the northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise meridian, city of Meridian, Ada county, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A," rezoning 0.34 acres of land from the R-4 zoning district to the O-T zoning district in the Meridian City Code; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps, as well as the official zoning maps and all applicable official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date. Simison: Thank you. Council, you have heard this ordinance read by title. Is there anybody that would like it read in its entirety? If not, do I have a motion? Taylor: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Councilman Taylor. Taylor: I move that we approve Ordinance No. 24-2061. Overton: Second. Cavener: Second. Simison: I have a motion and a second to approve Ordinance No. 24-2061. Is there any discussion on the motion? If not, clerk will call the roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Simison: All ayes. Motion carries and the item is agreed to. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Simison: Council, anything under future meeting topics or a motion to adjourn? Meridian City Council October 8,2024 Page 74 of 74 Strader: Mr. Mayor? Simison: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Not seeing any future meeting topics I move that we adjourn the meeting. Simison: Motion to adjourn. All in favor signify by saying aye. Opposed nay? The ayes have it. We are adjourned. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:10 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) 10 / 22 2024 MAYOR ROBERT E.SIMISON DATE APPROVED ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law for District at Ten Mile (H-2023-0071) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located at the northwest corner of S. Ten Mile Rd. and 1-84 CITY OF MERIDIAN FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI DIAN:-~' AND DECISION&ORDER In the Matter of the Request for: • Amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan (CPAM) to change the designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent properties, resulting in a net change in this area as follows: Medium High-Density Residential (MHDR) (+9.26- acres), High Density Residential(HDR) (+2.66-acres); Mixed Use- Residential(MU-R) (-10.61-acres), Mixed Use - Commercial (MU-C) (+0.32-acre), Mixed Employment (ME) (-0.22-acre), and High Density Employment(HDE) (- 1.40-acres); • Modification to the existing Development Agreements (MDA) (Vanguard Village H- 2021-0081,Inst.#2022-049799; Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC AZ-11-001,Inst.#112073618; SJJV LLC AZ-11-001, Inst. #112073617; Janicek Properties LLC AZ-11-001,Inst. #112073616)to consolidate them into one(1) new agreement,which will replace the previous agreements (or a portion thereof, as applicable for Vanguard Village), and include a conceptual development plan for the overall area; • Rezone (RZ) of 7.48-acres of land from the C-C to the TN-C district; 12.96-acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district; 9.13-acres from the C-C to the H-E district; 25.97- acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district; and 1.37-acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district; and • Preliminary Plat(PP) consisting of 38 building lots and one (1) common lot on 108.77- acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G, H-E and M-E zoning districts,by Ball Ventures Ahlquist. Case No(s). H-2023-0071 For the City Council Hearing Dates of. September 17 and 24,2024 (Findings on October 8,2024) A. Findings of Fact 1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 24, 2024, incorporated by reference) 2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 24,2024, incorporated by reference) 3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 24, 2024, incorporated by reference) 4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 24,2024, incorporated by reference) B. Conclusions of Law FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DISTRICT AT TEN MILE-CPAM,MDA,RZ,PP H-2023-0071 - 1 - 1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503). 2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as Title I I Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian, which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps. 3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A. 4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction. 5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed. 6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party requesting notice. 7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the hearing date of September 24,2024,incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the application. C. Decision and Order Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that: 1. The applicant's request for CPAM,MDA,RZ and PP is hereby approved per the provisions in the Staff Report for the hearing date of September 24,2024, attached as Exhibit A. D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-613-7A). In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat, such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B). Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord with I I-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DISTRICT AT TEN MILE-CPAM,MDA,RZ,PP H-2023-0071 -2- to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I- 6B-7C). Notice of Development Agreement Duration The city and/or an applicant may request a development agreement or a modification to a development agreement consistent with Idaho Code section 67-6511A. The development agreement may be initiated by the city or applicant as part of a request for annexation and/or rezone at any time prior to the adoption of findings for such request. A development agreement may be modified by the city or an affected party of the development agreement. Decision on the development agreement modification is made by the city council in accord with this chapter. When approved, said development agreement shall be signed by the property owner(s) and returned to the city within six(6)months of the city council granting the modification. A modification to the development agreement may be initiated prior to signature of the agreement by all parties and/or may be requested to extend the time allowed for the agreement to be signed and returned to the city if filed prior to the end of the six(6)month approval period. E. Judicial Review Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-652 1(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight (28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as provided by chapter 52,title 67,Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA. F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory takings analysis. G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of September 24,2024 FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DISTRICT AT TEN MILE-CPAM,MDA,RZ,PP H-2023-0071 -3- By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 8th day of October 2024. COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED (TIE BREAKER) Mayor Robert E. Simison 10-8-2024 Attest: Chris Johnson 10-8-2024 City Clerk Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 10-8-2024 City Clerk's Office FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER FOR DISTRICT AT TEN MILE-CPAM,MDA,RZ,PP H-2023-0071 -4- EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (:�WEIIty DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 9/24/2024 00 DATE: Continuedfrom:911012024& 911712024 TO: Mayor&City Council ___ __ oe FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 sallen@meridiancity.org F-, �i APPLICANT: Ball Ventures Ahlquist SUBJECT: H-2023-0071 Legend _ Project location District at Ten Mile—CPAM,MDA, ` _ Area of Impact RZ,PP t= City Limits ' LOCATION: Northwest corner of S.Ten Mile Rd. & O Analysis e I-84 in Section 15,T.3N.,R.1W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The Applicant has submitted applications for the following: • Amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan(CPAM)to change the designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent properties,resulting in a net change in this area as follows: Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR)(+9.26- acres),High Density Residential(HDR) (+2.66-acres);Mixed Use-Residential(MU-R) (-10.61-acres),Mixed Use-Commercial(MU-C)(+0.32-acre),Mixed Employment (ME)(-0.22-acre), and High Density Employment(HDE)(-1.40-acres); • Modification to the existing Development Agreements (MDA)(Vanguard Village H- 2021-0081, Inst.#2022-049799;Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC AZ-11-001,Inst.#112073618; SJJV LLC AZ-11-001, Inst. #112073617; Janicek Properties LLC AZ-11-001, Inst. #112073616)to consolidate them into one(1)new agreement,which will replace the previous agreements(or a portion thereof, as applicable for Vanguard Village), and include a conceptual development plan for the overall area; • Rezone (RZ) of 7.48-acres of land from the C-C to the TN-C district; 12.96-acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district; 9.13-acres from the C-C to the H-E district;25.97- acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district; and 1.37-acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district; and • Preliminary Plat(PP)consisting of 38 building lots and one(1)common lot on 108.77- acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G,H-E and M-E zoning districts. B. Issues The proposed conceptual development plan,use area plan and intensity of development is not consistent with the development guidelines in the TMISAP for the proposed FLUM designations. City of Meridian I Department Report I. Project Overview EXHIBIT A Further,the TN-C zoning is not an appropriate zone for the proposed multi-family residential development(see analysis in Section III below for more information). C. Recommendation Staff. Staff is in support of the proposed plat but is not in support of the proposed MDA, CPAM and RZ applications as the proposed development plan doesn't meet the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP and doesn't provide the mix of integrated uses desired in Mixed Use designated areas. If Council is of the opinion the proposed development plan is more appropriate for this area than that envisioned in the adopted TMISAP, Staff recommends alternate FLUM designations and zoning are approved consistent with the proposed development plan,as follows: MHDR and R-15 zoning for the property in Area 1; and Commercial and C-G zoning in Areas 2 and 3, as shown in the second map in Section VII.0 below. Otherwise, Staff recommends denial of the proposed MDA, CPAM and RZ applications. Commission: Recommend approval to Council with the additional recommendation that Council consider if the proposed FLUM designations &zoning are consistent with the proposed development plan and whether those need to be modified. D. Decision City Council: Approval II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) L Agricultural - Proposed Land Use(s) A variety of uses are proposed consisting of multi-family - residential(apartments&townhome style);commercial (large format/anchor and specialty retail,restaurants, entertainment,recreation,hospitality,childcare,office); and employment(medium to higher density office, commercial,recreation,medical and hospitality uses). (See Use Area Plan in Section V.H) Existing/Proposed Zoning Existing:H-E(High-density Employment),C-C VILA.2 (Community Business),TN-C(Traditional Neighborhood Center) Proposed:TN-C(33.42-acres),C-C(59.11-acres),C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial)(25.97-acres), M-E(Mixed Employment)(10.1 9-acres)and H-E(34.82- acres) id Existing/Proposed Future Land Use Existing:MHDR(Medium-high Density Residential),MU- VILA.3 Designation Res(Mixed Use—Residential),Mixed Use—Commercial (MU-Com),HDE(High-density Employment) Proposed:MHDR(on adjacent property only),MU-Res, MU-Com,HDE Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date Tuesday,November 21,2023 Neighborhood Meeting 12/4/2023 Site posting date 8/5/2024 City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics EXHIBIT A Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District • Comments Received No • Commission Action Required No • Access S.Ten Mile Rd.,arterial street • Traffic Level of Service F Traffic Impact Study(Y/N) No(ACHD didn't require one;ITD is requesting one) ITD Comments Received Yes—ITD requests a Traffic Impact Study for this development as impacts to the State Highway System are anticipated due to the type and proximity of the development. Meridian Fire Distance to Station:2.1 miles to Station#2;Response Time: 3 minutes Meridian Police Distance to Station:5.9 miles;Response Time:4:13 minutes Meridian Public Works Wastewater Distance to Mainline: Sewer is in S.Ten Mile Rd.and stubbed to this property—it's in the process of being extended to the west in S.Vanguard Way to serve this site; Impacts or Concerns: See Public Works comments Meridian Public Works Water Distance to Mainline:Water is in S.Ten Mile Rd.and stubbed to this property—it's in the process of being extended to the west in S.Vanguard Way to serve this site (pressure zone 2);Impacts or Concerns: See Public Works ■ _ comments See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section for all department/agency and the public record for comments received on this application. City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics EXHIBIT A Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:51215131401 Date Retrieved:2024 18/6 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage I nfill Indicator: 156 709 Surrounding Area &�_� 34% Not city ®0 City Limits 249 1,4 ■ Not City 7 7Q7 Household Change Household& Population Growth ■ Households 02020 Population Change:34.5% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 72% 69% 4% ❑ Multi-family 28% 27% ® Commercial Preliminary Plats(last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved i - MW=MMW 0 1000 2D00 3000 4000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 ■ Single-family Multi-family 2.00 - 1,000 Single-family °i 1.50 Residential u a Parcel Diversity N 1.00 Soo U O Parcel Count in 0.50 u m Q.10 *Average Acres 0.00 0.00 u.14 a 0 R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 aiResidential NetDensity 10.00 0 10.04 o 07.30 5.00 $.20 o.00 ____qa•39_____q0:00 Dwelling Units 1 Acre R-2 R-4 R-S R-15 City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics EXHIBIT A Figure 2: Service Impact Summary Ready Q Q o 0 0 Marginal Caution Po ����� aa roo� `r0O� 91k 0 5 4 III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. History This overall property consists of several parcels of previously annexed land governed by five(5) different Development Agreements(DA)(i.e. The 10 at Meridian;Vanguard Village; Fedrizzi Ten Mile,LLC;Janicek Properties Ten Mile; and SJJV,LLC).The southwest portion of this site (Parcel#1215427850)was included in the Vanguard Village preliminary plat;the final plat is currently in process.Links to these agreements are provided below in Table 4. The existing DA's for Fedrizzi,Janicek and SJJV do not include a conceptual development plan but do include provisions for future development of the property and restrictions on certain uses. Prior to development, an amendment to these agreements is required to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates compliance with the TMISAP. The DA for Vanguard Village includes a conceptual development plan, shown in Section VLF below, and provisions for future development of the property consistent with the TMISAP; an amendment to the DA was recently approved but has not yet been recorded.Note: The amended DA does not affect the subject property. The concept plan included in the DA for The 10 at Meridian,the adjacent property to the north, did not include a development plan for the property at the northeast corner of this site that was previously part of that development. Table 4:Proiect Overview Description Details History AZ-09-008 (Meridian Crossing—Ord.#10-1467;DA Inst.#110115738); AZ-11-001 [Ten Mile Annexation—Ord.#12-1520(Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC—DA Inst.#112073618,Janicek Properties Ten Mile—DA Inst. #112073616,SJJV,LLC—DA Inst.#112073617)];H-2021-0025(The 10 at Meridian—Ord.#21-1948,DA Inst.#2021-132704);H-2021-0081 [Vanguard Village—RZ,PP,CUP,MDA Inst.#2022-049799(replaced previous DA#110115738);H-2023-0072(Vanguard Village—MDA not yet recorded);FP-2024-0012(Vanguard Village FP,PS—currently in process) Phasing Plan 1 Physical Features The Purdam Gulch Drain crosses this site.The Williams Northwest gas pipeline crosses the southwest portion of this site that's part of the Vanguard Village plat. , Acreage 108.77-acres(preliminary plat); 163.67-acres(DA boundary) Lots 38 building lots; 1 common lot — City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis EXHIBIT A B. General Overview Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment: This property is within the area governed by the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP),which is part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map(FLUM) in the Plan is proposed to change the land use designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent abutting property and right-of-way,resulting in a net change in this area as follows: (see FLUMMap-Adopted vs. Proposed in Section VZ.0 below) Net Land Use Change Total Change0 IMed-High Density Residential 9.26 High Density Residential 2.56 MU-Res 1.51 MU-Conn (11.80) Mixed Employment (0.22) High Density Employment (1.40) Total (0.001 The map amendment includes some"clean-up"changes recommended by Staff on the abutting property to the west(Endurance Holdings—Parcel#S 1215244200,zoned R-15 and mostly designated MHDR); and the right-of-way for W. Cobalt Dr. along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to Outer Banks Subdivision(zoned C-C and designated MU-Res)based on the existing multi-family entitlements on those parcels and the Applicant's proposed amendment(see pink/white dashed line area on the exhibit in Section V.0 below). Without including the proposed clean-up changes on adjacent properties,the changes to this property are as follows: -2.8-acres of MHDR,no change to HDR,+2.3-acres of ME,+3.74-acres of MU-Com, and no change to HDE. In summary,most of the Applicant's proposed changes are just a reconfiguration of existing FLUM designations and not significant changes. Development Agreement Modification: A new Development Agreement(DA)is proposed to consolidate and replace all of the existing DA's (i.e.Vanguard Village H-2021-0081, Inst. #2022-049799;Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC AZ-11- 001,Inst. #112073618; SJJV LLC AZ-11-001, Inst. #112073617;Janicek Properties LLC AZ-11- 001, hest. #112073616)on the subject property. A new conceptual development plan is proposed for the overall area as shown in Section V.G below;the existing conceptual development plan for Vanguard Village is included in Section V.F below—changes are proposed to that plan.The other DA's do not include conceptual development plans and require modifications to the agreements to include one prior to development. A phasing plan is not proposed for the overall development plan.As this is critical in understanding timing for infrastructure improvements, Staff recommends one is submitted prior to the City Council hearing. The Applicant has declined to do so. Rezone: A rezone of 7.48-acres of land is proposed from the C-C to the TN-C district, 12.96-acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district, 9.13-acres from the C-C to the H-E district,25.97-acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district, and 1.37-acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district. With the proposed rezone, a significant amount(i.e. 21+/-acres) of the H-E zoned area will be lost and replaced with C-C and C-G zoning,which will likely further decrease the amount and intensity of employment uses in this area because a wider range of uses are allowed in the C-C and C-G districts than the H-E district(i.e. allowed uses in the H-E zone consist of corporate headquarters, office complexes,research and development facilities and complementary services such as conference centers and hospitality use with limited retail; allowed uses in the C-C district are larger scale and broader mix of retail, office and service uses; allowed uses in the C-G district are the largest scale and broadest mix of retail,office, service and light industrial uses). This will result in less employment uses(i.e. family wage jobs)in this area than anticipated,which is a key City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis EXHIBIT A component of the TMISAP. Note: If Council approves an amendment to the FLUM for the proposed development plan and Staffs recommended associated"clean-up"items, a rezone from H-E to M-E (on the southern portion of the site) and C-C to R-40 (Cobalt right-of-way) should also be approved. Preliminary Plat: A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 38 building lots and one(1)common lot on 108.77- acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G,H-E and M-E zoning districts. The plat does not include the Vanguard Village property. The plat is proposed to be developed in one(1)final plat phase. Staff recommends the subject property is subdivided prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancies within the development.Permanent addresses cannot be assigned until Ada County has approved street names. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements(UDC 11-1): There are no existing structures on this site; infrastructure improvements are currently being constructed. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): A Use Area Plan was submitted with this application and included below in Section VI.H. The Plan depicts three(3) different areas;however,the boundaries of these areas do not coincide with the proposed FLUM designation boundaries,which makes determining consistency with the FLUM designations difficult. These areas are as follows: • Area 1)accommodates a mix of multi-family residential such as townhomes and multi- family. This area is mostly designated MU-Com with MU-Res and a small amount of MHDR and zoned mostly TN-C with some C-C. The map amendment proposes a MU-Res land use designation with TN-C zoning for the entire area. The Applicant states a gross density of 8 to 12 units/acre based on 268 to 402 residential units on 33.42-acres of land is proposed, consistent with the density range desired in the MU-R designation. A diversity of compatible land uses is encouraged in MU-Res areas,which may include a mix of residential,office,retail,recreational, employment and other miscellaneous uses. While the focus is on residential uses,the horizontal and vertical integration of retail,office and employment uses is essential. This designation requires developments to integrate the three(3) major use categories—residential, commercial and employment.Live-work units are strongly encouraged as are a variety of other housing types. Office, employment and commercial uses are generally small in scale and focused on neighborhood services within the MU-Res area. Traditional neighborhood design concepts—higher density buildings close to the street, easy pedestrian access,narrower streets to slow traffic,parking lots behind or under buildings, and residences with porches or balconies facing the street—are essential. The mix of uses should allow for a diversity of housing with for-sale and rental properties and may be achieved horizontally throughout the site;however,vertical mixes within buildings are highly encouraged. The goal to achieve in these areas is a floor area ratio(FAR)of 0.75 or more.No more than 40%of land area within MU-Res areas should be utilized for non- residential uses.An overall target density of 8 to 12 dwelling units per acre is desired with higher densities allowed on individual projects. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis EXHIBIT A The purpose of the TN-C district is to serve as the focal point of a neighborhood center,containing retail,commercial, and community services to meet the daily needs of community residents within a one-to two-mile radius.It's pedestrian oriented and is designed to encourage pedestrian connection with a traditional neighborhood residential district.Uses in the TN-C district includes small-scale retail, restaurants,recreational,personal services,public or quasi-public uses, churches, and attached and multi-family dwellings. The allowed uses for the TN-C zoning district are listed in UDC Table 11-2D-2;the proposed uses(i.e. multi-family and townhouses)are principally permitted in the TN-C district. The standards for the TN-C district are listed in UDC 11-2D-5,as follows: maximum building height is 45-feet(additional height may be allowed as noted in UDC 11-2D-3B);minimum number of stories for new construction adjacent to any street is two (2); maximum building footprint is 20,000 square feet,however,other than retail,all other uses may be allowed a footprint of greater than 20,000 square feet through the conditional use permit process;and minimum contiguous district size is 6-acres,or 2- acres when adjacent to property with a mixed-use future land use designation. Only residential uses are proposed in the requested MU-Res FLUM designation and TN-C zoning district—the"mixed-use"component of the designation and TN-C district is entirely missing.Only one of the three major use categories are proposed (i.e.residential)—no retail,office or employment uses are proposed as required, which are essential in MU-Res designated areas. The proposed MU-Res designation and TN-C zoning is not consistent with the proposed development plan or the intended plan for this area as the required mix of integrated uses is not provided. • Area 2)accommodates predominantly commercial mixed uses,including large format/anchor and specialty retail,casual and fine dining,entertainment,recreation, hospitality, childcare and office uses. This area is currently designated mostly MU-Res and MU-Com with a small amount of HDE;the zoning is mostly C-C with some H-E and M-E. The map amendment proposes MU-Com and HDE land use designations with C-C,H-E, C-G and M-E zoning with the majority being C-C. The MU-Com designation encourages the development of a mix of office,retail, recreational, employment(i.e. family-wage jobs) and other miscellaneous uses with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses. While the focus of these areas is on commercial and employment uses,the horizontal and vertical integration of residential uses is essential to securing entitlements.As with all mixed-use areas,this designation requires development to integrate the three(3) maior use categories—residential, commercial and employment.In MU-Com areas, three(3)or more significant uses also tend to be larger scale projects. This designation is intended to provide flexibility and encourage developers to build innovative projects. Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential.The goal to achieve in these areas is a FAR of 1.00-1.25 or more. Development should exhibit quality building and site design and an attractive street character. The mix of residential uses may be achieved vertically within buildings;however, some horizontal mixes may be allowed. This designation calls for an overall target density of 8 to 12 units per acre with higher densities allowed on individual projects.No more than 30%of the ground level development within the MU-Com designation should be used for residences. HDE areas are recommended as predominantly office,research and specialized employment areas; and generally do not include retail and consumer service uses serving the wider community. Limited retail and service establishments primarily serving City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis EXHIBIT A employees and users of the HDE area are encouraged. These areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small, local or start-up businesses, as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises. They should be designed to encourage multi-modal travel and convenient circulation to supporting services located within the area. Whenever \ \ \ \ � 26,600 SF ]B.]00 SF n 250 SF �Is,—sF 21850 SF ^ ^ 15,860 SF cc� >4.000 SF \\\\ MU-REJ V 14,250 vF v� 13,SOO SF \\\ 4,500 S' ,550 SF \ \ v,]oosE MU-COM \ 16,e]s sE \\ \ � ^ 3,4005E (''� �. ],5005F 4,275 SF �6,000 SF I I 1 + 1 W.VILLAOOIO WAV 11 8,13`SF g.J10.950 SF �J 10.300 SF 9.450 SF 10,000 SF 45,4505E 25,000 SF 30,]50 SF- ],SOO SF ].00O S20,25'SF�- 25,000 SF26,800 SF 19.000 SF HDE za,zoo sFt _ ::s- 148,000 SF 5],100 SF�' 14,000 SF20 INTE— 19.000 SF 23,600 SF 89 possible,HDE areas should provide restaurants,lodging and other services in support of the employment uses and be designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development. It's anticipated that buildings will range in height from 1 to 6 stories,have total floor areas of 10,000 to 1,000,000 square feet, and that the FAR will exceed 1.0. Designs that promote open space and parks are strongly encouraged. Structured parking is also allowed. Land use types desired in HDE areas are corporate, business and professional offices;research facilities and laboratories;and complementary uses primarily serving district employees and users, such as business services,conference centers, child care,restaurants, convenience retail, and hotels and motels. Per UDC Table 11-2B-1, allowed uses in the C-C district are larger scale and a broader mix of retail, office and service uses located with access to arterials or non-residential collectors; allowed uses in the C-G district are the largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office, service and light industrial uses in close proximity and/or access to interstate or arterial intersections; allowed uses in the M-E district are offices,medical centers, research and development facilities, and light industrial uses with ancillary support services with access to arterial or collector; and allowed uses in the H-E district are corporate headquarters, office complexes,research and development facilities and complementary services such as conference centers and hospitality use with limited retail in close proximity to Federal and State highway interchanges and major arterials. The allowed uses for the C-C, C-G,M-E and H-E zoning district are listed in UDC Table 11- 2B-2;the dimensional standards are listed in UDC Table 11-2B-3. The Applicant submitted a plan shown below that depicts building square footages for the 76.15-acre HDE area totaling 533,450 s.f.resulting in a floor area ratio(FAR)of 0.16 and for the 64.21-acre MU-Com area totaling 489,640 s.f.resulting in a FAR of 0.18, which is significantly below the goal of 1.00-1.25 or more in the MU-Com area and exceeding 1.0 in the HDE area. Development in these areas needs to be much more intense in the MU-Com and HDE designated areas and designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development in order to be consistent with the Plan. City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis EXHIBIT A Although a mix of commercial uses are proposed,only one of the three major use categories is provided(i.e. commercial)—no major employment uses are proposed as required in either the MU-Com or the HDE areas and integrated residential uses are not proposed in the MU-Com area,which are essential.The proposed MU-Com and HDE designations are not consistent with the proposed development plan or the intended plan for this area as the required mix of uses is not provided—significant changes to the concept plan and use area plan would be needed in order to be consistent. • Area 3)accommodates medium to higher-density office, commercial,recreation,medical and hospitality uses. This area is currently designated MU-Corn and HDE with C-C,M-E and H-E zoning. The Applicant proposes a reconfiguration of the MU-Com and HDE areas and a rezone to reconfigure the boundaries of the C-C,H-E and M-E districts accordingly and add C-G zoning. The Applicant also proposes to change a"sliver"of the HDE area along the west boundary in Areas 2 and 3 of the Use Area Plan to ME and rezone from H-E to M-E for the southern portion of that area to match that of the abutting property to the west and to align with the future lot line. The ME area will be developed by Adler Industrial separate from this development. See above for information on MU-Com and HDE designated areas and associated analysis.As noted above,the FAR's in the MU-Com and HDE areas are significantly below the established goals in the Plan.Although commercial and employment uses are proposed from the three(3)major use categories,integration of residential uses is not proposed as desired. Office and other employment uses need to be of a much higher intensity in this area in order to be consistent with the MU-Com and especially the HDE designation and designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development Recreation uses are not desired in HDE designated areas. In 2022,Planning Staff prepared a Land Use Analysis for the Mayor& Council related to alignment of development approvals within the Ten Mile Area in relation to the TMISAP itself.The Plan was adopted in 2007 and encompasses 2,200 acres; this area was planned foremost to serve as an employment area with supporting residential uses to balance transportation impacts and to provide for unique lifestyle opportunities. The Plan is envisioned by land use area(acres)to be approximately 48%non-residential and 52% residential. The analysis at that time reflected 27% non-residential and 73% residential; additional approvals since that time are referenced in Section VII.A.S,there have been no updates to this analysis.Much more and a higher density of employment uses are needed in this area to provide jobs for area residents and balance transportation impacts. In summary, Staff is not in support of the proposed map amendment and associated rezone based on the conceptual development plan proposed as it doesn't meet the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP nor does it provide the mix of integrated uses desired in Mixed Use designated areas or the intensity and/or types of uses desired in the MU-Com and HDE designated areas. If Council is of the opinion the proposed development plan is more appropriate for this area than that envisioned in the adopted TMISAP,Staff suggests alternate FLUM designations and zoning are approved consistent with the proposed development plan, as follows: MHDR and R-15 zoning for the property in Area 1; and Commercial and C- G zoning in Areas 2 and 3 (see second adopted vs.proposed FLUM exhibit in Section City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A Vii.q. Note: The City Council previously approved an alternate FLUM designation of Commercial for the Ten Mile Crossing development across Ten Mile Rd. to the east that deviated from the TMISAP. 3. Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): See UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the dimensional standards of the C-C, C-G,M-E and H-E zoning districts; and UDC 11-2D-5 for the TN-C district. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The future multi-family development must comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3- 27. Other uses as noted in the applicable Allowed Use table may require compliance with specific use standards. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Existing structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Future development should comply with the structure and site design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19;review for compliance with these standards will take place with future development applications. Comprehensive Plan Policy#3.07.01A-"Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening, transitional densities, and other best site design practices." 2. Qualified Open Space&Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-4-3-27): The future multi-family development should comply with the open space and site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27C, D. Review for compliance with these standards will take place with the Conditional Use Permit and/or Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for such,as applicable. An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VH.L. Comprehensive Plan Policy#2.02.01 E—"Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed-use areas near in and around Downtown, near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map." 3. Landscaping(Comp Plan, UDC 11-3B): Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02D—"Require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer,screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods." i. Landscape buffers along streets A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Ten Mile Rd.,an entryway corridor and arterial street; 20-foot wide street buffers are required along all collector streets (i.e. W. Cobalt Dr.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Umbria Hills Ave., S.Navigator Dr., and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way); and a 50-foot wide street buffer is required along I-84. Landscaping is required within the street buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Additional landscape design features are required along entryway corridors(i.e. S. Ten Mile Rd.). Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided with the subdivision improvements. ii. Parking lot landscaping Internal parking lot landscaping is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A I1-3B-8C. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses The C-C, C-G and H-E zoning districts require a 25-foot wide buffer to be provided to residential uses; landscaping and sometimes fencing(if the use can't be adequately buffered by landscaping)is required within the buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. iv. Tree preservation Existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site during development may require mitigation(see UDC 11-3B-10 for more information). v. Storm integration Stormwater integration is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-I I C. vi. Pathway landscaping Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC I1-3B-12C. 4. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided with all development in accord with UDC standards. i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for the multi-family development in accord with the standards for such listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6.Note: Townhomes are considered multi family when not on individual lots. ii. Nonresidential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for non-residential uses in the commercial and traditional neighborhood districts in accord with the standards listed in UDC I1-3C- 6B. iii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking is required to be provided for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, except for single-family residences, duplexes and townhouses per UDC 11-3C-6G. Bicycle parking facilities should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02—"Support beautiful and high-quality development that reinforces neighborhood character and sustainability." Typically,all building elevations should comply with the design guidelines in the TMISAP (see Application of Design Elements table on pg. 3-49)and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. However,the Applicant requests that these guidelines and standards not apply to this development and instead proposes alternate design standards and a design review process of their own for the proposed development as part of the development agreement. The proposed proiect design standards incorporate site development and architectural design standards. The intent of which, as stated in the document, is to establish a set of criteria and procedures that will be used to implement The District at Ten Mile's land use policies to ensure economic viability and a high-quality standard of development that encourages flexibility, innovation, creativity and design elements within the overall development. These City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A standards are proposed to supersede the design guidelines in the TMISAP. The document proposes to create an overlay district and applies to all development within The District. Prior to submission of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC)application to the City, a Design Review application will be submitted to the Master Developer for review to ensure compliance with the Site Development and Design Standards. Once approval is granted,the application will then be submitted to The District at Ten Mile Architectural Review Committee(TDARC) for review and approval. Following both approvals,the CZC application can then be submitted to the City without further design approvals from the City. While all of the proposed design standards may not expressly align with the guidelines in the TMISAP,they appear to generally follow the guidelines and should ensure a high quality of development. These standards may not allow deviations to UDC standards. Note: The City Council previously approved alternate design standards to those in the ASM and the guidelines in the TMISAP for the Ten Mile Crossing development across Ten Mile Rd. to the east. The proposed design standards and process is similar to those. 6. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All/any fencing proposed on the site should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 for fencing along waterways and 11-3A-7. 7. Parkways(UDC 11-3A-17): All parkways should comply with the standards for such listed in UDC 11-3A-17. 8. Public Art—TMISAP (3-47) Public art in a high quality of design is required to be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-47). The Applicant should submit a plan depicting general locations of public art alone with examples of the art proposed with the final plat application. E. Transportation Analysis A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was not submitted for this development as ACHD did not require one. ITD is requesting a TIS for this development as impacts to the State Highway System are anticipated due to the type and proximity of the development. Collector streets are required to be constructed with development in accord with ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM). The preliminary plat depicts the extension of Villagio/Grand Mogul from S. Ten Mile Rd. to the west boundary of the subdivision,the extension of W. Cobalt Dr. to S. Umbria Hills Ave.,the extension of Umbria Hills south to Villagio/Grand Mogul, and the extension of W.Navigator Dr. to the west boundary of the site in accord with the MSM. The Street Section Map in the TMISAP requires Vanguard/Villagio from Ten Mile to the roundabout to be constructed in accord with Street Section B as a typical 4-lane parkway and west of the roundabout with Street Section C as a major collector street; Cobalt with Street Section D as a residential collector street; Umbria Hills with Street Section E as a minor collector street—because diagonal parking isn't appropriate for this section, Staff instead recommends this street is constructed as a residential collector in accord with Street Section D; and Navigator with Street Section C as a major collector street in accord with the following diagrams,unless otherwise required by ACHD: City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A B i' Ir Ir lr lr 71• d 8ie knd UM, rQdLw Tdrttuk phe l.. LmWo B H &obmr.hdd•o u fwoe•mai.0 107 . LT i -tV C ' .v I I}i p aYe II{ 4. idVR il! p 4�n� �tiny (Uobt4-[11�dstanar - � k rai7_:P lae I 'niviLane WN6Ldrte pd InQ LJ11, Lane I [utCB•Nlb tllsyA{e r. we a i Wlllyg l�l �ru Parking i � {�-lu-club dL�idl�t � Note:Street Section "E"is included for reference but not recommended to be constructed. City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A Collector streets should be designed in accord with the street sections shown above as depicted on the Street Section Map in the TMISAP unless otherwise approved by ACHD with the exceptions of 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways in lieu of on-street bike lanes for public safety and the provision of on-street parking in areas not indicated for such where buildings are close to the street and parking is warranted. 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access is proposed via the extension of S.Umbria Hills Way from the north boundary; and the extension of W. Cobalt Dr., S. Vanguard Way/Villagio and W.Navigator Dr. from the east boundary of the site, all collector streets. Comprehensive Plan Policy#6.01.02B— "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity." 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multi-use pathways are required to be provided with development in accord with the Pathways Master Plan.Per the plan,a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway is required along the Purdam Drain(or drain alignment) and should connect to the existing pathway in Baraya Subdivision to the north; within the street buffer along the east/west collector street(i.e. Villagio/Grand Mogul);and within the street buffer along I-84. A 14-foot wide public use easement is required for the multi-use pathways required by the Pathways Master Plan where they lie outside of public right-of-way and should be submitted to the Planning Division and recorded prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. The easement and recorded instrument number should be depicted on the plat. 3. Pathways(Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. A mobility plan was submitted as shown in Section VII.M below showing vehicular, pedestrian,bicycle and service drives that demonstrate good connectivity throughout the site. 4. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Staff recommends as a DA provision requiring 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways to be provided along all internal collector streets and those abutting this site(i.e. along the west boundary)in lieu of on-street bike lanes for public safety. 5. Private Streets(UDC 11-3F-4): All private streets constructed within the subdivision should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. A separate application is required to be submitted for approval of private streets and should be submitted concurrently with the final plat application. 6. Subdivision Regulations(UDC 11-6): Compliance with the subdivision design and improvements standards listed in UDC I I-6C-3 is required. F. Services Analysis See Service Accessibility Report in Section VILB below. 1. Waterways(Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): All waterways, except natural waterways, are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space,in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 6. The Purdam Gulch Drain bisects this site and lies within an 85-foot wide easement and is City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A proposed to be piped with development.A private drain exists along the west side of the property as depicted on the plat and should be piped with development. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-I5): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided in each development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-1 S. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in accord with the adopted standards, specifications and ordinances;design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City per UDC 11-3A-18. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): All utilities for the proposed development are required to be installed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-21. Water service will be provided to this property via extension of main lines in Ten Mile Rd.; main lines are required to be extended to and through the subject property with development. The developer should coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Dept. and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Sanitary sewer service will be provided via extension of main lines located near the Purdam Drain on the northeast side of the subject property; main lines are required to be extended to and through the subject property with development. The developer should coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Dept. and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS&CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A new Development Agreement(DA) shall be required as a provision of the MDA and RZ applications. The previous DA's [i.e. Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC(Inst. #112073618),Janicek Properties Ten Mile(Inst. #112073616), SJJV,LLC(Inst. #112073617),The 10 at Meridian (DA Inst. #2021-132704);Vanguard Village(Inst.#2022-049799] shall no longer be in effect for the subject property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner at the time of rezone ordinance adoption,and the developer.A final plat application shall not be submitted until the rezone is finalized. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision &Order for the Rezone and DA amendment request. The new DA shall incorporate the following provisions: i. Future development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the conceptual development plan,use area plan,mobility plan,preliminary plat and landscape plan included below in Section VI and the standards in the Unified Development Code(UDC). ii. Future development of Area 1,as depicted on the Use Area Plan in Section VI.H, shall be consistent with the development guidelines of the Medium High Density Residential Future Land Use Map designation in the TMISAP. iii. Future development of Areas 2 and 3, as depicted on the Use Area Plan in Section VI.H, shall be consistent with the Commercial Future Land Use Map designation in the City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A Comprehensive Plan. iv. Future development shall be consistent with the Project Design Standards submitted by the Applicant and approved with this application, included herein. These standards shall supersede the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design guidelines in the TMISAP. These standards shall not allow deviations to UDC standards. v. A collector roadway system shall be constructed on the subject property in accord with Ada County Highway District's Master Street Map and in accord with Street Section Map in the TMISAP as recommended by Staff, as follows: Villagio/Grand Mogul shall be constructed from Ten Mile to the roundabout in accord with Street Section B as a typical 4-lane parkway and west of the roundabout with Street Section C as a major collector street; Cobalt and Umbria Hills shall be constructed in accord with Street Section D as a residential collector street; and Navigator shall be constructed in accord with Street Section C as a major collector street in accord with the associated diagrams in the TMISAP,with the exception that 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways shall be required in lieu of on-street bike lanes and on-street parking may be provided in areas not indicated for such where buildings are close to the street and parking is warranted,unless otherwise approved by ACHD. vi. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancies within the development. vii. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway shall be constructed along the Purdam Drain(or drain alignment)in accord with the Pathways Master Plan and shall connect to the existing pathway to the north in Baraya Subdivision. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the pathway. viii.Ten(10)foot wide detached sidewalk/pathway shall be constructed along both sides of all collector streets(i.e. W. Cobalt Dr., S. Umbria Hills Ave.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Navigator Dr. and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way)within the site and adjacent to the west boundary of the site in lieu of on-street bike lanes; and within the street buffer along I-84. A public use easement shall be submitted to the City for any portion of the sidewalks/pathways that lie outside of the public right-of-way. ix. Public art in a high quality of design shall be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-47). The Applicant shall submit a plan depicting general locations of public art along with examples of the art proposed with the final plat application. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 35-foot wide street buffer along S. Ten Mile Rd., an entryway corridor; 20-foot wide street buffers along all collector streets(i.e. W. Cobalt Dr.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Umbria Hills Ave., S.Navigator Dr., and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way); and a 50-foot wide buffer along 1-84 in common lots or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement,maintained by the property owner,homeowner's association or business owner's association. ii. Depict street sections in accord with the Street Section Map in the TMISAP as required in the development agreement. iii. Depict 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways along both sides of all collector streets (i.e. W. Cobalt Dr., S. Umbria Hills Ave.,W. Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Navigator City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A Dr., and S. Sunset Point Way) and within the street buffer along I-84. iv. Depict public pedestrian easements for any portion of the detached sidewalks/multi-use pathways along the collector streets that are outside the public right-of-way and recorded instrument numbers of the easement where a separate easement is required by the Park's Dept. 3. The landscape plan shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 35-foot wide street buffer along S. Ten Mile Rd., an entryway corridor; 20-foot wide street buffers along all collector streets(i.e. W. Cobalt Dr.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Umbria Hills Ave., S.Navigator Dr.,and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way); and a 50-foot wide buffer along I-84. ii. Depict landscaping within all street buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Additional landscape design features are required along entryway corridors (i.e. S. Ten Mile Rd.). iii. Depict 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways along both sides of all collector streets (i.e.W. Cobalt Dr., S.Umbria Hills Ave.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Navigator Dr. and S. Sunset Point Way)and within the street buffer along I-84. iv. Depict landscaping along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C. 4. Prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature, a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division,approved by City Council and recorded for the multi-use pathway along the Purdam Drain(or drain alignment)and any other pathways required by the Park's Department in accord with the Pathways Master Plan that are outside of public right-of-way. 5. All private streets constructed within the subdivision shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. A separate application is required to be submitted for approval of private streets and should be submitted concurrently with the final plat application. 6. All waterways, except natural waterways, are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space,in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 6. 7. Permanent addresses cannot be assigned until Ada County has approved the proposed street names. 8. Approval of the preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the reliminary plat.Upon written request and filing by the applicant prior to the termination of the period,the director ma authorize a single extension of time to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the director or City Council may require the preliminary plat. combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of this title. 9. Staff's failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the Applicant from compliance. Other Agency comments may be accessed in the project ale included in the public record. City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The City Council finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The City Council finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff complies with the regulations outlines for the proposed districts. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,and welfare; The City Council finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The City Council finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff should not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the proposed request is for a rezone, not annexation. B. Comprehensive Plan(UDC 11-511-71)) Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a amendment to the Comprehensive Plan,the Council shall make the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan is consistent with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and development of the city. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan,provides an improved guide to future growth and development in the City. 3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the goals,objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Unified Development Code. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, is consistent with the Unified Development Code within the conditions listed herein. 5. The amendment will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses if approved by City Council. 6. The proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, will not burden existing and planned service capabilities in this portion of the city. Sewer and water services are available to be extended to this site. 7. The proposed map amendment(as applicable)provides a logical juxtaposition of uses that allows sufficient area to mitigate any anticipated impact associated with the development of the area. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan,provides a logical juxtaposition of uses and sufficient area to mitigate any development impacts to adjacent properties. 8. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. The City Council finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, is in the best interest of the City. C. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The City Council finds the proposed development plan and alternate FL UM designations suggested by Staff with the conditions contained herein, the preliminary plat will be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the UDC. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The City Council finds public services are available to the site and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The City Council finds there are no scheduled public improvements adjacent to or on this site. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The City Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The City Council finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural,scenic or historic features. The City Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. City of Meridian I Department Report EXHIBIT A VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff is not in support of the proposed map amendment and associated rezone based on the conceptual development plan proposed as it doesn't meet the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP nor does it provide the mix of integrated uses desired in Mixed Use designated areas or the intensity and/or types of uses desired in the MU-Com and HDE designated areas. If Council is of the opinion the proposed development plan is more appropriate for this area than that envisioned in the adopted TMISAP, Staff suggests alternate FLUM designations and zoning are approved consistent with the proposed development plan, as follows:MHDR and R-15 zoning for the property in Area 1; and Commercial and C-G zoning in Areas 2 and 3 (see second adopted vs. proposed FLUM exhibit in Section VII.Q. B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on August 15,2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject CPAM,MDA,RZ and PP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: Tonn Peterson,Ball Ventures Ahlquist; Geoff Wardle,Clark Wardle, Colin Ronhaar,Ardurra; Elizabeth Allen,Ball Ventures Ahlquist—APplicant and Representatives b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Jenny Defrates d. Written testimony: Kristina Bolt;Geoff Wardle,Clark Wardle(Applicant's Representative) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s)of public testimony a. Concern that the proposed development will increase the traffic gridlock on Ten Mile, Franklin&1-84. b. Desire for preservation of the existing(cedar?)tree along Ten Mile Rd. and any other trees on the site. c. In support of the services and shopping opportunities proposed within the development. d. Against the proposed development. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission. a. Agreement with Staff that the proposed development plan is not consistent with the TMISAP. b. Concurrence that the TMISAP being 17 years old may be outdated and there mae need to refresh it to reflect current conditions. C. General agreement that the proposed development plan is appropriate for this area and supports Staff's suggested path forward with FLUM designations and zoning districts. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Recommend approval to Council with the additional recommendation that Council consider if the proposed FLUM designations&zoning are consistent with the proposed development plan and whether those need to be modified. 5. Outstanding. issue(s)for City Council: A. Staff requested the Applicant submit a phasing plan for the overall development to understand the timing of infrastructure improvements—the Applicant has declined to do SO. City of Meridian I Department Report VI.Action EXHIBIT A C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on(continued from: September 10,2024) September 17 and 24,2024.At the public hearing on September 24,2024,the Council moved to approve the subject CPAM.MDA. RZ and PP applications. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing. a. In favor: Geoff Wardle,Clark Wardle, and Tonn Peterson b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: Gina Johnson,Kristina Bolt,Karla Ehlers,Ryan Manwaring,Katie Manwaring,,Colin Ronhaar,Heather Christiansen,Natalie Purcell d. Written testimony: Several letters of testimony have been received(see public record) e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen and Bill Parsons f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. Request for the developer and the City to consider an alternate development plan for this area that would benefit charities: b. Concern what the proposed development will do to this area,no need for more multi-family in this area—the City already has The Village,consider the neighborhoods in this area: C. Against more high-density apartments in this area,concern pertaining to capacity of area schools: d Concern about lagging infrastructure in this area,quality of education for our kids healthcare issues: 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. Cumulative impacts to the school district. b. Possible reduction of traffic on Ten Mile with the construction of SH 16 and Linder Road overpass. c. Project potential to contribute to the overall non-residential uses in the area. d. ITD's requirements for a traffic impact study. e. ACHD improvements being required with the development, current road improvements underway,and the need for a regional traffic impact study. f. Phasing of the project. 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation: a. None VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps Note:Because the subject property has not yet been subdivided, the following maps depict the parcel as it exists today; however, a portion of the parcel at the southwest corner of the site is not a part of this application. (link to Project Overview) City of Meridian I Department Report VII.Exhibits EXHIBIT A 1. Aerial Legend Project Location ++•'' Area of Impact d OAnalysis f 2. Zoning Map R1 M-E TN-R C-N. I-L i Ml RUT C2 RUT R-8 R-40 ::. TN-R R-15 TN-C TN-C -L C-C Legend R-g 4 Project Location ;.:Area of Impact OAnalysis RR �RI M-E RUT o : TN-R LSO R-15 City of Meridian I Department Report VII.Exhibits uq�\rn_eul�uurnnlinrnunn� � `M�����*�I',� f.�IAli1r1� r J o • ��li� Z FRI�NKL-INN 111111111111111171111711111 7\1711111F a=111 =r Ir1111�� � \IIIIr e V I . . .. q nil I IN -OYERL'-'AND -/� -• ��..-t � - � -- ..r uua - Lilp�\\IrCglll�llllnnuu 1111 1111 • 111111l1111 ar•� W uup� l�111lO . nuiir■ nJnnnmoon. J — �mlr= __ r IH� 'INIIIIINIL4 mi1WWD _-_-- i c ■�� -'SO •• n rfn• - mr !!lulinulgpuei all ■ �� ���7■I■1 r �■ Will a � nlnT-.� alll rtrrilrnn - I • III__===71111f11 �_.=====11111f1f �■ ��. �I 1,+illllll IIIIIII 1 Q=rllllllpllllllllll=�- m_mll1 -�Ilulnfunrlllll== � � � 71r_ �■ . � „' nnpnul�nllnr �I� • . - . . . � � ■■ � 4 ��■II����IIIIIIII� . _. . .. �_ ■■■• _ - �. .11�■1�-IIIIIIII 1 84 �� ■ I ■■��� M II E�■ ■OYER�AND �•■• i/ ��� EXHIBIT A B. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S1215131401 SERVICE ACCESSIBILIT'" Overall Score: 29 32nd Percentile Description Location In City Limits GREEN Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains e 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or> 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. RED Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1/4 mile of future transit route YELL0IV Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master street= GREEN plan) matches existing(#of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 112 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report VII.Exhibits EXHIBIT A C. Future Land Use Map—Adopted vs.Proposed Applicant Proposed: 0 500 1,000 oate:7/22/2024 Feet Adopted Future Land Uses r r FRANKIIN - jII � I I I r • U .�• fz I u u I IL `y1 - iI 5J II I I II I Area of Change 0 Applicant Proposed Proposed Future Land Uses OMB, Staff Cleanup -------FRANKLIN � IQ 11 7 LLI WA I I I I I I I tr/,���'�— 04 igh Density !�`�♦/_�---f,Y , I I I f I �1/� �� o - -- I I City of Meridian Department Report VII.Exhibits EXHIBIT A Staff Recommended(if Council Approves Proposed Development Plan): 0 500 1,000 Date:811212024 Feet Adopted Future Land Uses --FRANKLIN-- - � , -,I , Imo/ � ! ICI,/►r`jJ��. Tim �* L5�r~4� 1 . I 1' �4 I l PAS y IF Density 1� 00� R/1 Employment • _ * = = _ I � Area of Change Staff Aftemativeta Applicaton Proposed Future Land Uses ■..a Staff Cleanup - W- ZA0011.0� 4 a�A- , II; � y} 1 -i OAF 4 I I City of Meridian Department Report VII.Exhibits EXHIBIT A D. Rezone Legal Descriptions&Exhibit Maps }, C- I ` T -C iti ,m-ter � m ere, Z Fn C-G o 76" J C-G �ff ._- - City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits EXHIBIT A ARDURRA Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE TN-C DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the 5W1{4 of the NE114 of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northeast one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the north boundary of said SW1{4 of the NEl/4, A. N.89°15'15"W.,21.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence leaving said north boundary, 1. S.00°44'48"W.,60.36 feet;thence, 2. 5.14°46'46W.,96.99 feet:thence, 3. 5.28058'46'"W.,589.66 feet;thence, 4. S.04%T51"E.,297.25 feet;thence, 5. S.46°31'04" .,77.20 feet;thence, 6. S.04°54'04"E.,279.57 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 7. Westerly along said curve to the right having a radius of 2000.00 feet,an arc length of 130.48 feet,through a central angle of 3°44'17",of which the long chord bears S.88°53'09"W.,130A6 feet to the south boundary of said SW 114 of the NE114:thence,along said boundary,tangent from said curve, B. N.89°14'39"W.,15.40 feet,thence, leaving said boundary, 9. N.00°45'22"E.,67.95 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve,thence, 10.Northerly along said curve to the right having a radius of 914.00 feet,an arc length of 615.97 feet,through a central angle of 38°3648",of which the long chord bears N.04°48�03"W.,604.38 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 11.Northerly along said curve to the left having a radius of 1450.00 feet,an arc length of 580.02 feet,through a central angle of 22°55'69",of which the long chord bears N.01°39'21"E,576.16 feet;thence, non-tangent from said curve, 12.N.00°12'10"W.,83.53 feet to said north boundary,thence,along said boundary, �{pL CAAj 13.S.89°15'15"E.,450.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. , CONTAINING: 7.48 Ac. 13765 �6 0 of 332 N.BroodmGm Way I Numpq,ID 8368J 1 208.442.6360 1 www.uFdurro.com EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE TN-C LOCATED IN THE SWI14 OF THE NE114 OF SECTION 15, 0 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO if 2024 21,07' y POINT OF CN1116 N89'15'15"W 1320.78' BEGINNING NE1116 848.92 _ 0 a w 62 a ZONE TN- ! S V Inn• 200' 100' 7.48 AC � � I o + � ;o (TN-0)Go to N AN A Q w m r)LL � � o o cn [n � a 1 I LAB Q f } 13765 wa 'p 0 i� a a ff C114 896_41 — CE1116 r 589'14'39'E 1321.43' Li 250:39'�-9d4111G i CCA-4C�rg z -- a //�/ ARDURRA i� q 332 N.6ROAOMORE WAY NAMPA,IDAHO 83887 LJ 20&-dd2#300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM EXHIBIT A l/ ARDURRA Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-C DESCRIPTION A parcel of land being all of Lot.2 Block 2 of Outer Banks Subdivision,recorded in Book 126 of Plats at Pages 20200-20205, records of Ada County, Idaho,located in the NE1J4 of the NE1{4 of Section 15, Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the north one-sixteenth corner common to Sections 14& 15,thence,along the south boundary of said NE1f4 of the NE1f4, A. N.89°14'59"W.,81.87 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence,continuing, 1. N.89°14'59"W.,358.84 feet; thence,leaving said north boundary, 2. N.59°25'50"E.,162.82 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 3. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 263.00 feet,an arc length of 117.45 feet,through a central angle of 25'35'17",of which the long chard bears N.72'13'2811E. 116.48 feet to a curve;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 4. 5.59031'25"E.,110.35 feet;thence, 5. 5.03°39'59" ., 57.05 feet; thence, d. 5.86°20'01"E.,17.00 feet;thence, 7. 5.03°39'35"W.,9.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.62 Ac. a. 13765 0 F 'MP-� 332 N.Bfaadmare Way Nompo,ID 83687 1 208.442.6300 WWW.Wdumo.com EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE C-C LOCATED IN THE NE114 OF THE NE114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST. BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2024 A 0' S0 im 2M ZONE � CrC 0.6 AC NE1116 �aa.sa N1116 N89-14'59'W 1321,21' 15,914 POINT OF {C BEGINNING m � UL o 0 ;}z m C E V 115 S89'15'03'E 1321.73' A4 L A k� AL 13765 Of OVA- ARDURRA 332 N.BROAD MORE WAY } NAM PA,IDAHO836a7 208- 42-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM EXHIBIT A RDURRA Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-C DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1I4 of the SE114 of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County.Idaho.more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the one-quarter corner common to Sections 14& 15;thence,along the east boundary of said NE114 of the SE114, A, 5.00°30'02"W.,278.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence,continuing 1. 5.00°30'02"W.,606.98 feet,thence, 2. N.89°16'04" .,880.37 feet;thence, 3. N.00°43'56"E.,442.18 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 4. Northerly along said curve to the right having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 103.87 feet,through a central angle of 29°45'21",of which the long chord bears N.15°36'37"E., 102.70 feet to a point of reverse curve;thence, 5. Northerly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 10187 feet, through a central angle of 29°45'21",of which the long choral bears N.15°36'37"E., 102.70 feet; thence,tangent from said curve, & N.00°43'56"E.9 83.67 feet;thence, T S.87°57'20"E,30.11 feet,thence, B. SM'W'00"E.,107.18 feet;thence, 9. S.88°34'44"E.,793.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 12.34 At. I& LAB 1Ar 4 375 •T jk46 � 332 N.Broodmore Way f.3 npa,0 83687 208.442.6300 1 WWW.ardVFro.com EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE C-C LOCATED IN THE NE1l4 OF THE SE114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN.ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2024 E2 CE11113 $8915'05-E 1321.73' n — — — 15 14 o POINT OF BEGINNING Ex! ca s I o � I (H-E) o ZOhIE r o 12.34 AC (mix W LU W m LL. LL (H-E) � w o � w it ¢ v u7 0 S89'13'37E 1.322.88- SE1116 - - - — 1514 W S1116 L9_ L e 4r ' } 291�39u-%P.dOYIXG_3_IimC�,dg $'�6iQ� 230�79 13765 If of =14.BROADMORE WAY NAMPA,IDAHO 83687 208442-6300 1 WWWARDURRA.COM EXHIBIT A / ARDURRA Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 2 ZONE WE DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1{4 of the SE1/4,the NW114 of the 5E114,the SW114 of the NE1l4 and the SE114 of the NE1/4 of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center one-quarter corner of Section 15;thence,along the north boundary of said NW1l4 of the SE1l4, A. S.89"14'39"E., 721.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence,continuing, 1. S.89"14'39"E., 190.81 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 2. Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 2000.00 feet,an arc length of 304.36 feet,through a central angle of 8°43'10",of which the long chord hears N.86°23'38"E., 304.07 feet to a curve; thence, 3. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 1500.00 feet,an arc length of 145.02 feet,through a central angle of 5°32'22",of which the long chord bears N.84°48'23"E., 144.96 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 4. N.87°34'33"E.,9.81 feet;thence, 5. 5.00°4512"W., 199,38 feet;thence 6. S.89019'13"E.,411.44 feet to the heginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 7. Southwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 221.22 feet,an arc length of 160.92 feet,through a central angle of 41°40'42",of which the long chord bears 5.69°45'07"W 157.40 feet;thence,tangent frorn said curve, 8. S.49°45'00" .,229.53 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve:thence, 9. Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 247.12 feet.an arc length of 148.00 feet,through a central angle of 34°18'48",of which the Iong chard bears 5.71°09'48"UV., 145.80 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 10. S.00"33'00"W., 124.95 feet;thence, 11. N.89"14'39"W., 579.54 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 12. Northwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 93.52 feet,through a central angle of 2V4732",of which the Iong chard bears N.12°47'04"W.,92,67 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 332 N.Broad more Wary I Nompo,I 83687 1 208.442.6300 1 www.ardurro.corn EXHIBIT A Project No:230739 Date. May 16,2024 Page 2 of 2 13. N.00636'43"E.,450.89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 9.13 Ac. 13765 OF .� 2 332N.BrocidmPreWray Nampa.083687 209.442.6300 I WWW.OFdUrr4,Cam EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE WE EZ LOCATED IN THE NE114 OF THE SE114,THE NW114 OF THE SE114, THE SW114 OF THE NE114,AND Trig SE114 OF THE NE114 OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN. CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2024 C3 0' 100, 200' 400' 0 NE111B a V a cn O � ti w � X POINT OF (TN-G) BEGINNING (G ) —_ C114 589'14'39"E 1321,43' c! S89'15'05% 1321.73' _ 721.00' GE1116 BASIS OF BEARINGS 15 14 L� Ld V GO O Y r ZONE a H-E o PC) s.13 AG 0 x 0 (H-E) LO w � w � o n ;'7 .d pL LANDS z } SE1116 v GCSµ 29P'391xF 951kG; U-q 6 SYEit ?]h7:H m of /��/ ARDURRA 332 N.BROAD MORE WAY NAMPA.IDAHO 83687 206- 42-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM EXHIBIT A RDURR Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-G DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NW1l4 of the 5E1I4 and the NE1/4 of the SW1l4 of Section 15, Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the center one-quarter corner of Section 15;thence,along the north boundary of said NW114 of the SE114, 1. S.89014'39"E., 721.00 feet;thence,leaving said north boundary, 2. S.00°36'43"W.,450.89 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 3. Southeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 93.52 feet,through a central angle of 26°47'32",of which the long chord bears 5.12°47'04"E,,92.67 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 4. N.89°14'39"W.,309.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence. 5. Southwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 244.64 feet,through a central angle of 14°01'00°,of which the long chard bears 5.83°44'51"W., 244.03 feet,thence,non-tangent from said curve, 6. N.39°31'08"W., 748.08 feet to the north boundary of said NW114 of the SEIM;thence,along said boundary, 7. 5.89°14'48"E.,291.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 9,82 Ac, 4 6� Or 13765 332 N,Broadmore Woy Nompo,ID 83687 208.442.6300 1 www,orduric.com EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SKETCH . ZONE C.G § LOCATED IN THE NW114 OFF E SE114 AND THE NE1 k OF THE SWIM OF SECTION1% § TOWNS HIP3 NO RTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISEMERIDm%CITY OF N ERI DIAN,ADACOUNTYJD O § mm A § N@' 1E« NE t1e 22 § \_ § � � 7POINT OF / BEGINNING A m C1& ENS 29"1 4ms1J2 .43 § § ma3 CE1114 % I § 3ZONE E § ( -C) 982* 2 (M7) - \_ I § I W| /I ° t G \I � y § / » k ! ,2 ' ' ± ) ( BASIS OFBEA�NrGS if CS£1e N&;2y�■ SE111 ( § L�%� 2 ' cE ' m & » « ,_ v ,ok _ m, \ 13765 A R D UR R A \ -I've or ` 'k § m0- aN-mmmmE ¥ NAMPA,IkHO 83687 A2-63001 ■WW.AR»RFtA.COM EXHIBIT A RDURRA Project No.230739 Date. May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE WE DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1l4 of the SWI/4 and the NW114 of the SE114 of Section 15, Township 3 North,Range I West, Boise Meridian.City of Meridian,Ada County. Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center south one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the west boundary of said NIN1{4 of the SE1{4, A. N.00°37'23"E.,570.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence, 1. N.89°49'30"W.,65.26 feet;thence, 2. N.87°57'46"W., 195.19 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence,. 3. Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet,an arc length of 70.03 feet through a central angle of 5°21'01",of which the long chord bears N.68°46'35"E., 70.01 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 4. N.66°06'05"E.,231.67 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve; thence. 5. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 185.66 feet,through a central angle of 10'38'16",of which the Iong chard bears N.71'25'13"E,, 185.40 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 6. S.39°31'08"E.,241.72 feet;thence, 7. N.89°49'30"W.,346.28 feet to the POI NT0F BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 1.37 Ac. 13765 0 F 0'mA 332 N.Broadmare Way I Nampa,0 83&8J 208.442.6300 www.ardurro.corn EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE WE LOCATED IN THE NE114 OF THE SW14 AND THE NW114 OF THE SE114 OF SECTION 16, 6 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2024 a _ CE1f15 N$g'14'39"W 1321.43 4 m r � LA � IL] W iV M1 2 (H E) (C-C) Eli 1.37 AC cl POINT OF (H-E) z BEGINNING w I 4 H O O Y u 100' 200' 400' adr 4 CS1116 BASIS OF BEARINGS SE111B uu IV8$`13'31"W 1323-1 S y ypL LAkU � 5r 73�39X�9NING N f4E�lJ�drg - - . 13765 T£ Of o'm h � 332 N.BROAD MORE WAY y NAMPA.IDANO83W tiJ 208-442-6300 1 WV W.ARDURRA.COM EXHIBIT A / RDURRA Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-G DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1l4 of the SW114 of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West. Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center south one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the east boundary of said NE1f4 of the SW114, A. N.00°37"23"E.,574.32 feet.thence,leaving said west boundary, B. N.89022"37"W.,260.40 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve and the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence, 1. Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 750.00 feet,an art length of 252.69 feet,through a central angle of 19'1&16",of which the long chord bears S.81°06'13"W., 251.50 feet,thence,tangent from said curve, 2. N.89°14'39'W, 51.86 feet;thence, 3. N.00°44'31"E.,41.94 feet;thence, 4. S.89°17'19"E.,299.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.21 Ac. ge �" r 13765 tiM1 Iq4 p'lrl�+ - 332 N.Broadmore Wary Narnpo,ID 03687 248.442.6300 I www.ardurro.corn EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE C-G LOCATED IN THE NEIf4 OF THE SW114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2024 a m 581'14'3B.E 1322.75' 1 1 FJ S89'14'48"E 1322,78' C 1�4 �� — a Fk a 4 0' S4' 104' 2W o � � r O N � NS iy pq w W U a (M-E) `+ fl a Z O ci m 2 Nag 22'37"W 26U.40- El LZCOINF/ // n.21 nc/ POINT OF BEGINNING (N-E) w % O M. 51116 — — — BASIS OF BEARINGS CS1!16 = N69'14'03'w 2647.96' — — ❑ pL LA NO 95 L 13765 IRDURR OF 332 N.BROADMORE WAY O'MAV r[- NAMPA,ICAHO8368T LJ 208-442-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM EXHIBIT A I"rV\ RDURR Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 2 ZONE C-G DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1I4 of the SW1{4 and the NW114 of the SEIM of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center south one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the east boundary of said NE1l4 of the SW1l4, A N.00°37'23"E.,77.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence,leaving said east boundary, 1. N.84°05'20"W.,208.50 feet;thence, 2. N.84"22'21"W., 139.20 feet;thence, 3. N.81"25'39"W.,216.99 feet;thence, 4. N.00"45'17"E.,393.76 feet;thence, 5. S.8 9a 14'39"E.,5 1.8 6 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 6. Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet,an arc length of 252.69 feet, through a central angle of 19°18'16".of which the long chord bears N.81°06'13"E.,251.50 feet;thence, non-tangent from said curve, 7. 5.89013'33"E.,606.67 feet;thence, 8. N.39°31'08'"W.,241.72 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 9. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 244.64 feet,through a central angle of 14°01'00",of which the long chord bears N.83°44'51"E., 244.03 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 10.S.89014'39"E.,309.87 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 11.Southeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 50.49 feet,through a central angle of 14°2748",of which the long chord bears S.33°24'43"E.,50.35 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 12.S.50a34'i 9"W.,15 7.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 13.Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 301.72 Feet,an arc length of 222.21 feet,through a central angle of 42°11'50",of which the long chord bears S.71°43'54"W., 217.22 feet;thence, non-tangent from said curve, 332 N.Broadmora Way I Nampa,0 8368J 1 208.442.6300 1 www.ardurra_eom EXHIBIT A Project No.230789 Date:July 11,2024 Page 2of2 14.5.39°31'08"E,721.50 feet;thence, 15.N.86"48'58" .,573.95 feet;thence, 16.N.84°05'20"W.,337.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGI NNI NG. CONTAINING: 15.94 At. 0L LA 13765 of 0,$ ' 2 332 N_Broodmora Way Nampo,0 83687 I 208.442.63DO www.ordUFro.com EXHIBIT A ToySCGa o ) / § � § Lu k � § \ I ° | j < ! (/ 2 i 2 j; K � § ( 3 R § $ H § / QR ( m % U f / o / \ \ �� 8 w �� 2 � � § I | LL _ LU oD � $ \ ok wA , LU ) z 9 § y % ) � / � LU 2 0 k § � & ƒTZ % w LL§ LU 7 b ] w � $� n § } aq § % � ) 22 { . ( w @ ® / cm M § 7 w §| m 0 t 2 e co ± § - - � z $ 2 ( © EXHIBIT A E. New Development Agreement Boundary—Legal Description&Exhibit Map ARDURRA Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the 5112 of the NE114,the N112 of the SE114,and the NE114 of the SW 114 of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho, mare particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the center north one-sixteenth corner of said Section 14,thence,along the north boundary of said 5112 of the NE114, 1_ 5.89°1515'E_,1320.76 feet to the northeast one-sixteenth corner of said Section 15,thence, continuing, 2_ 5.89°14'59'E_,880.50 feet to the south right-of-way of Cobalt drive;thence,leaving along said right-of-way the following courses: 3_ N.5902550"E.,162.82 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 4_ Easterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 263_00 feet,an arc length of 117.45 feet, through a central angle of 25135'16',of which the long chord bears N_72113'28"E_,116.48 feet, thence,non-tangent from said curve, 5_ 5.60°24'53'E_,88.51 feet;thence, 6_ 5.55°54'35'E_,21.&4 feet;thence, 7_ S_03°39'59'W_,57.05 feet'thence, S_ S.&6D2901'E_,16_90 feet to the west right-of-way of S.Ten Mile Road;thence,along said right- of-way the following courses: 9. S.03°39'35' .,670.74 feet;thence, 10.5.10°44'07' .,96.98 feet;thence, 11.5.43°06'22' .,84.65 feet;thence, 12.5.06°21'28' .,207.42 feet;thence, 13_S_01D25'18'W_,559.90feet-,thence, 14.5.01°25'16' .,57.7D feet;thence, 15.5_0402957'W_,550.74 feet;thence, 16.5.04°20'S7' .,34.63 feet;thence, 332 N_8roodmore Way ' Nomp4 083687 , 2U8.442.6300 l www.ordurra_com EXHIBIT A Project No: 23D739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 2of2 17_S_15°01'39'W_, 99.2D feet to the north right-of-way of the westbound Interstate 84 on ramp; thence,along said right-of-way the following courses: 18_S_47°33'D4'W_, 109_D9 feet;thence, 19_S_66°54'29'W_, 105.73 feet;thence, 20_S_80°09'20'W_, 150.16 feet;thence, 21_S_76DO1'12'W_,330.69 feet;thence, 22_S_79°54'25'W_, 177.77 feet;thence, 23_S_84°46'37'W_, 162.75 feet;thence, 24_S_88°47'D4'W_, 108.25 feet;thence, 25.5.88°46 59'W_,3 12.10 feet to the north right-of-way of Interstate 84; thence,along said right- of-way the following courses: 26_ N_86048'58"W_, 675.49 feet; thence_ 27_ N_84005'20"W_, 546.27 feet; thence_ 28_ N_84022'21"W_, 139.20 feet; thence.- 2 9- N_81025'89"W_, 216.99 feet; thence_ leaving said right-of-way, 30_ N_O(r45'12"E_, 1190.89 feet to the north boundary of said NE114 of the SW 114; thence,along said boundary, 31_S_89°14'48"E_, 558.49 feet to center one-quarter corner of said Section 15;thence along the west boundary of said S112 of the NElf4; 32 N_00°36'37"E_, 1328.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING_ CONTAINING: 163.67 Acres pit L 137 U% f ION0 Ir of 332 N.Broadrnore Way hrmrir;ID 83687 208_442.6300 wwwxrdUFro_wm EXHIBIT A . U-> f § o £ d - o§ \ [C, ■ � K / c 3mv &]I S m k 2 Z � § z & m § / �) , g 2 \ § °4 ( & _ §LUo LLJ co IT areJ� ym, £mN � LUL- - - - - -- & / 6 . @ (§E§ - Mq [ w �� ■ \g f k /�� * | ) §z w \ LUa. > \ 22 I&■ R § � 2 LL 2 i b /�j\ Irl " W � \ z \ k a � w g RT% z £oDN & � z m a 0 § xI f I} 77 I\ ± § � CO § ELL al §z E k I e I Z - } § § BEgU B § n\ § <u ` uj § 2 � g EXHIBIT A F. Existing Conceptual Development Plan for Vanguard Village 5,TEN MILE ROAD 0.0 . 1,U F 40 _. .l i �� H ' � or • t4r1FI.r;r# Note: The property within the red-outlined area above(i.e. Vanguard Village) is proposed to be included in the new Development Agreement. EXHIBIT A G. Proposed Overall Conceptual Development Plan O - ° J ................. W— - .TEN MILE ROAD = 3i IVA r h Tssy 4,ca094 � Sq 9 � 6 FI � �T""'y�•"IF,s� 1lMW � i., • �� 1'... 9f � ���hy tl�3�i�y�-�Y, r� 3: + M top A 1 Q y ` • • a r _? d� r— r ��7 4 Z W [Y b '� w r df 4 • k 00 � :v ss•�s N • � •S � �v� � � �a"a�� rr so ss rs��M N •i lip goo s t w l s 9 S SS: s•' s �:�a3r�.-: r `. � I 1 I � i I W y I W Z � sd I I I m>a I I I I I I . I EXHIBIT A H. Use Area Plan The image above shows three (3) areas that make up The District at Ten Mile Development based on the underlying zoning and future land use designation boundaries. AREA 1 accommodates a mix of multi-family residential uses such as townhomes and multifamily. AREA2 accommodates predominantly commercial mixed uses,including large format/anchor and specialty retail,casual and fine dining,entertainment,recreation, hospitality,childcare,and office uses. AREA 3 accommodates medium to higher-density office,commercial,recreation,medical,and hospitality uses. f ir�ya rWR y• S � •\ + '�yr 1 ' J �yM1 a a as a !' o a a as a aV. _tl - -- J. It 1 .9 at * �r'r a INTERSTATE 84 EXHIBIT A I. Preliminary Plat(date: 6/4/2024) a' v2RIn(w NOISIAKiens A11A N31IMUSIO 3H1 aodlYndAavnuwnaad e © `o% UI `1 ofd LD wo � 3 ffi�"m� d 3 W F w o gzz O f r�PL f LLI oo O =v< �Na � a 0 �V O•YRRa R® _ W R NB / R R I Jill Ill11111111 I�Jill Jill NN ��aa�� Ye�333A 6 MITT 1 � I 44 � 444 4 666 wg 888888666R R888888TTTT TTT8888 k �� aep� I � ��� �@e ���®�iII� iQ6666§66rigg� �§§6666�®�®8��6666 eeeNi $ A i A i R gR # i °o°o°o°o°o°o o°o°o°o°o°o='c o°o°o°o°o°®°o°o°©°o a N e o r r r r ® a ® s r a a31191H WdAL�ltll881 tltltlllaiNlO n01SalYftl3d X3111riY1�Il�dallNllWMS1nl11rP�311 tl0ln3nfltllWll BIHLlO NOLLYJIlIWIYtl03an3tl'nolla'loonmaun YWY01lVlOA1N3dOHd3H1 BI nrnrvusnl vim —01 EXHIBIT A _ mmn I aae.n.ax N SNOISN314I0 101 N vana Y NOISIAIflanS 3lIW N311Old-LSlfl 3Hl Ilk' :210d 1Vld AMIVNIN-Mid `� p s+wm� i 8 9 4 1i w 0 a ®s p R i a tl k p !g I t �� �____-_ __ 1a11aIM1gmaAWe9iS e II ! / 4 EXHIBIT A SNOII036 13MUS N cMi van(MV NOISINa8f1S 3lIW N311ORi1S10 3HJ- � ¢ UOdlFndAaVNiwn3ad z z z z z z z p ee TT Y d i e � Lj N P a IL a w a . F iyUj � r N p C i i d 1 W d a Z U P N a 3 3 3 a s s s 8 L 3 3 3 3 a31191HOtld All]Itl18 SI tltltlflUYJiO N01891Wtlid N3LLILM ali YJ3d81f10H1IM81N.]IIID]8111l0 L131Ntl18Nl 81NL i0 NOLLgJIiIQOW L038�3H'N0113fpOtld3tl NN tltltlfl0tlYi0 A1LidOtld 3N1811Niq�818N1 SINL�NI'dNOtlS gtld�0tlq��® EXHIBIT A r SNO1103S 133a1S r N v2Rln(MV NOISIAlClons 31IW N311ORilSlfl 3Hl _ II Av :aod rmwn-L ldAav3UcJ z �a L; i a L 0 Ot 0 a a a U31181N0old AL�ItlL881 YNdWWi0 N01881Wtl3d N31LItlM�Id YJ3d81f10H11M 31NiU10�811 LO 1N3Wf1U1811181H1 i0 NOLLtl81i10014 LO 3B�3tl'NOI1�il00tld3tl.Wtl YftlflUH0 i0 A1N3dO ld 3HL SI 1N3WI�tliSNl 81HL'�FII'd110tl`�gtltlNUW dt�'® EXHIBIT A J. Site Plan(date: 6/5/2024) NHId 311S N ni m van(MV NOIS1A1osns 3-1IW N311O1 IS10 3Hl �. A aOd 1Vld IaVNIWll3ad �� R go Iy C. 3fr u fiJ c r ILE [ - ---------- I ` I v - la'iendl'anv i � NOAM�]OX]a'S 3 J @ III I / j � C f ¢ [ I 3 t EXHIBIT A NHId 3118 N cv vanQ?�W` NOIS1/11a8f1S E]�IW N3110IHlSl4 3Hl � U :UOJ l'dld ANVN1VW3Ud MIN Lr Ooil J) h I I 01 -- EXHIBIT A NVId 311S " ni N©ISIAI(ionS El�IW N31 i3lHISIG 3H1 MCA 1Hld AMVNIwn32ld la® _ . . It BE In _ 1 IiA, Al j 1 Ll 1 ,; 1 , M, -�— � ` -- �g -------- �� + --------- III i II EXHIBIT A K. Landscape Plan O ° za o g ° "� ' � o c '� m 8 ;, m a a — H E E w C E Zzi — z ° - 0 a ` v F t - L EE v o g o m z y W w Q S n E tl Z Z O a H ° s o F 5 s o w J L� w LU o 1 5" 8 ,n a 5 Z w r r G ..`' TEN MILE ROAD �Y s+• -.-y��'� iV•+�� G - `i - -..•a `•S C CE ui • ly __ I e Q 11, W ' J LU a, { J H E I fie'= I I mii I I ' I EXHIBIT A ................. F a� =pwu o4¢ KE K smi �pw Fi W=V < rcW uy N 34 ES p 9p 5 9 s w Molz m-• - a� ................. g Z _g D.g _ w _a Z U — i 0 _e E 1 0.0gED r f BEN MILE ROAD • � W F I Jam ♦ of so Via. A 10 PW y 1 z III M i 4 in a / W Ld , I z W .a H F ................. Aq III II . Ili EXHIBIT A L. Open Space Exhibit g3g3 W N O §i sQ g gm is LL ti y P Q P?Ff QOK W�N w � a W WU� O 6 Q H U N m P z 7 p a C n W E N Ooa J a a O W ~ ................. IL W 0 ¢~ O u a m 0. w Z a Ow d z U o w z C w a a w o J_ f 3.TEN MILE ROAD z w F- H U b - r w r . I in LU POP q � a N W 2 r 1! 1■ :. L o z W `m F E ................. I Asa I I I I m>a I Iilll ► ll EXHIBIT A M. Mobility Plan O................. Z o a o _ - U Z ¢ O V g N � o � W zW ' • • ................. • ~z —� 5 ag F a — Y —a m � • aJ - o Zm - E J W a W J ..........;. © S.TEN MILE ROAR 40 Z e•r.....r. '. •.•...••... .... ••.......• . .. a • try f •� OL 00 :' 1011 V. �• Ate.0:.. 16 rip.��rg ego I �• z in W 3 W rIW J_ c Z W m F F ................. I I I ma¢ I li Ili EXHIBIT A N. Project Design Standards Please click on the following link to access the Applicant's proposed design standards for the development: (also included in the project file in the public record) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=355939&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU&cr= 1 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Final Order for Vanguard Village No. 1 (FP-2024-0012) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located a 1/4 mile west of S. Ten Mile Rd. on the north side of 1-84 BEFORE THE MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: 9/24/2024 ORDER APPROVAL DATE: 10/8/2024 IN THE MATTER OF THE ) REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT ) CONSISTING OF SEVEN (7) ) CASE NO. FP-2024-0012 BUILDING LOTS AND ONE (1) ) COMMON LOT ON 75-ACRES OF ) ORDER OF CONDITIONAL LAND IN THE M-E, H-E AND C-C ) APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ) VANGUARD VILLAGE NO. 1. ) BY: BALL VENTURES AHLQUIST ) APPLICANT ) This matter coming before the City Council on September 24, 2024 for final plat approval pursuant to Unified Development Code (UDC) 11-6B-3 and the Council finding that the Administrative Review is complete by the Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department, to the Mayor and Council, and the Council having considered the requirements of the preliminary plat, the Council takes the following action: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Final Plat of"PLAT SHOWING VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1, LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 AND THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 , SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VANGUARD VILLAGE NO. 1 FP-2024-0012 Page 1 of 3 2024, HANDWRITTEN DATE: 7/25/2024, by ROB O'MALLEY, PLS, SHEET I OF 3,"is conditionally approved subject to those conditions of Staff as set forth in the staff report to the Mayor and City Council from the Planning and Development Services divisions of the Community Development Department dated September 24, 2024, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto marked"Exhibit A" and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. The final plat upon which there is contained the certification and signature of the City Clerk and the City Engineer verifying that the plat meets the City's requirements shall be signed only at such time as: 2.1 The plat dimensions are approved by the City Engineer; and 2.2 The City Engineer has verified that all off-site improvements are completed and/or the appropriate letter of credit or cash surety has been issued guaranteeing the completion of off-site and required on-site improvements. NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND RIGHT TO REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS The Applicant is hereby notified that pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-8003, the Owner may request a regulatory taking analysis. Such request must be in writing, and must be filed with the City Clerk not more than twenty-eight(28) days after the final decision concerning the matter at issue. A request for a regulatory takings analysis will toll the time period within which a Petition for Judicial Review may be filed. ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VANGUARD VILLAGE NO. 1 FP-2024-0012 Page 2 of 3 Please take notice that this is a final action of the governing body of the City of Meridian,pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521. An affected person being a person who has an interest in real property which may be adversely affected by this decision may, within twenty- eight(28) days after the date of this decision and order, seek a judicial review pursuant to Idaho Code§ 67-52. By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 8th day of October , 2024. By: Robert E. Simison 10-8-2024 Mayor, City of Meridian Attest: Chris Johnson 10-8-2024 City Clerk Copy served upon the Applicant,Planning and Development Services Divisions of the Community Development Department and City Attorney. By: Dated: 10-8-2024 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR VANGUARD VILLAGE NO. 1 FP-2024-0012 Page 3 of 3 STAFF REPORT C� w IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT A H O DATE: 9/24/2024 Legend C0 TO: City Council Project Location - - FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: FP-2024-0012;A-2024-0088 --------- Vanguard Village No. 1 OF (aka Meridian 118) PROPERTY LOCATION: Generally located a 1/4 mile west of S. Ten Mile Rd. on the north side of I-84, in the south 1/2 of Section 15, T.3N., . a R.l W. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat(FP) consisting of seven (7)building lots and one (1) common lot on 75-acres of land in the M-E, H-E and C-C zoning districts for Vanguard Village No. 1. An application for approval of private streets (PS)within the development is also proposed. II. APPLICANT INFORMATION A. Applicant Elizabeth Allen,Ball Ventures Ahlquist— 1144 S. Silverstone Way, Ste. 510,Meridian, ID 83642 B. Owner: Ten Mile West Commercial,LLC— 1144 S. Silverstone Way, Ste. 500,Meridian,ID 83642 C. Representative: Same as Applicant III. STAFF ANALYSIS The preliminary plat(H-2021-0081)for the subject property included a total of eight(8)building lots and six(6) common lots on I I5.26-acres of land—six(6) of the building lots were depicted on the subject 75-acre property and two(2)were depicted on the northern 40-acre portion of the property. Public streets were proposed to be constructed within the subdivision as depicted on the preliminary plat. The proposed final plat depicts seven(7)building lots on the southern 75-acres,which is one (1) fewer than shown on the preliminary plat for the overall property. Because the northern portion of the Page 1 subdivision is under different ownership, Staff did verify with the owner's representative that they're amenable to the Applicant using one(1) of the building lots approved with the preliminary plat on their property as they intend to submit a new updated preliminary plat for that property in the future. Three(3)public streets were proposed with the preliminary plat on this portion of the property(i.e. S. Umbria Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr.,Vantage Point Way and Vanguard Trail). Only one(1)public street(i.e. S. Umbria Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr.)is proposed with the final plat;the other two streets are now proposed to be private. West Grand Mogul Dr.,an east/west collector street depicted on the preliminary plat along the northern boundary of this phase is being constructed and dedicated via deed to ACHD outside of the platting process;therefore, it's not included in the proposed final plat. A private street application was submitted for S. La Vista Ln., a north/south street that connects to W. Grand Mogul Dr. In order for the proposed final plat to be consistent with the approved preliminary plat, an east/west street is required between S.Umbria Hills Way and S. La Vista Ln. as depicted on the preliminary plat. Accordingly, Staff is recommending this street is included in the private street application and additional documents are submitted as required for approval of such private street. Because the number of building lots haven't increased,the street layout approved with the preliminary plat will be provided, and the proposed plat complies with the phasing plan approved with the amended development agreement(H-2023-0072), Staff deems the final plat in substantial compliance with the approved preliminary plat as required by UDC I I-6B-3C.2. IV. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed final plat and private streets with the conditions of approval in Section VI and in accord with the Findings included in Section VII below. Page 2 V. EXHIBITS A. Preliminary Plat(dated: 11/17/21) � �iMiwwvRATFOR VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION �rOFNE-o m UNW, ✓ 8 ! 3 mow, urrraa.i..a,wu. - i' 'fie -71— SITE DATA a NOTES 0 OR - Q � - � Y q�Vg+9�ayi� q a. -gyp � ,. S1IRROONUING SV o�xx- � olxlauw �7 �" •e annwuxo W [ ' o ._ g w + v 4 (.) 4 4VFN61HIIlk _ vr-oP a_a°wxwxMn - c O 0 6-�A Otirny®pwi.pw�p ry�l �' WIHNNINIi u.. 4 Page 3 EZ Mill I i5m.liff-��FE R! LU T 7 71 Cl. Z I- Z1-AW 17 LU < Page 4 ----------- --- --- - ------ - ---------------- ------- ---------- ---------- --------------- ClA Page 5 B. Final Plat(dated: 7/25/24) VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 LOCATED IN PORTION$OF THE N W114 OF THE$E114,AND THE HE 114 OF THE$W114,SECTION 15 LEGEND TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,RANGE 1 W EST,SOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MEWDWJ,ATM COUNTY,IDA HO 2024 urnpr uxE ______________________ [xlp[xt ura pulx a!Y xxpw� i %,xu�ux rwp✓card, ffT n'efeNL eE[Ix[ro � � - A- rc aar Ixsi xp vAx .rro. eepwxt T5lf.ar w�°"irlp %a.Y.'n 15015�s -__—_ Ct-___ epPM1rb�p]piy EsvoaxFx xei.xa 9Pp]vIrvWTuOE LI .-eFF x�p,[ry'�x-u_ uL2x_ c_-_nt u______��S—IXF'E BT}__ SY-- ------rt__yx--_ _¢ Rs WW]'a'"'E IDQ&41'-_ NNING ' -ni•C�x�q's_V_r_,[�J3xII� 12. Gr-6+II GSo[fET 1 Pf1IL6 n eee4a5'NI1 6eO] pTT,Ee_ S 6 en x�lus�8—��1j5 K�F0 1�d emr I�nan[• o I[a vu,suu m[ar�m I[i wPLrxae �, Y [EMAM6 I.EmEC,xx xK T[[6 R9100R94L 51 51 .� :-[caN[m,%yE mow w SWgdIWaAanoxs.Mxeh,.°c $� Isme[L erg„ i a T I ntxann x s em[%+c'nap ar m[xu[w[worn aapeno[ p u[51 w� e amwpow�[n.I�°n°0Eu'im.-'°o nifila°ec'i,m�,,TMa a z i � � 'c `�«` rT •:w[,orz es i� ,ro ra ec oe[wno wp xrs[nax nrt.,,.m.,spaµ[u �z �� � "•'sene�t mse • na awaSNxi meppxxs scnw:x-nw a me IONu ma.moon i �I ��•'B � �'M.•._,n[enTua'aN[�Y'�x [rou Fw�rr pl�e'mwmoi�r�fxsfn�e"`f own�exml�ie,[w'Iw�,oe°A[w�,aY ' �^�!�-T Q%HI[.BY w•n•exn¢p CUaIH6 M tR]PWi m[91 Lllgxp n �' __�.I[n -_-!.s_____J7C"•_sOLS.5p3T1.7l 5Y- �__-� a-�t Tp_e�y�l'ap!r`-ti__--a___te_.'-_•__N4 9e�{'�,�'1-i-_s_.e_zr' -�S_¢•--x_-p-t-[�'].L6n.'eaYc�'L�'$,�-_,ms_r---s-e-e-a--r.•w---_- - ,,tI xxpooe e5 ruc[Sa[.EIbI[[loaNe,nMEiS e�S xI�ceI[sr mFE.AU iIxT�O.npmF•,rtu W u ev,[r'hNmc aiee.xv Y wB To[ fo%.xwa[dt lwNava auxOwnx saip uFp xrrcra Maw'pIn,VrtY rtn 1ezI... 1 lIN _'_•.___ w 1e ma I1ns-Troandn -T,ro15 p1p�pu 4Mp p w[? zze m[ ar l [mT 5]1152E,r SEl![6 � �xei.t+p. W[mST x0. xLtIImav Ix Lx[aiu pE,�c Wwww.cw,w wui+n. AxF I. LpT s ApIX t rs O[9WaTEp tl x mleld utt b C p�[p 1la - [p er x[xgr,b siedxSRx'xo-,VeEA'S aglgpatgx s+u Ep[ LINE I UK TA9LE CUTE iIJ£E rTux eexEpe/EOm9e NO N]en[]YMIS FwFYFM W Fabpp V M W�[lxi xplln[EST%IpIE tn[Pu1Y. �a'aat Na eMYVYt N m Sn— em rxu^e x[ee% SURVEYOR'S NARRATIVE u x[paax u[pY,a,bi[.[e u,gspme[h[�d[S x pn.[rs'en Lt aTV.VrYt W xspX[et ne ,aaE•pr w Ex Cx u,sV -'W anx+b[l xpt.aY n 9[0.[erto n[u r,xL ipt€ ,p ax IxmExsrEut[sx+wo Fumc w nexzsvrt xsar�[ n.pr S.rY [[epo Eer xr1°'Surr e.arlc+�..s's,p'"`..5ueccx t+anYx[ti ,nxV Y[iere'T Hop' ,eor wY W Sepm'a'F ear paAr WS x[[a xr,A NIMM u xemgV ,ee3r w SexM1erVT Mel +ier.W Sean' e'M'W xpe75Np'1r pm.TTenrinpx pxSl%w rsEEaAOEp w mvwomvabm xm7,•s,ti xeam' w xp[q,•n� seM• ,reeW u+r s'Is•Ie• wrnr+ pz[r xm �nW[�,/.s>,o[xt x[x[w.me*Is, ,,e[5p mr oc todxx _ m�u[owvr ws trsu rEp nE E[xamxc a nc a']e2 _ a5e' W.YVmM Ysk uxef[eo[[apex�a59dr�E Lo senaNe'E ]'Sx1Y .IeNY msY' mee'a`wvee'S5'V sl aYd[b,M Y n�x�[`mn ep(a 9[INxIVdx W[ a x H e ulp a eLue t,La cu[T,a wm mf AmIFM1[i W sevla'xat [pf Ipxvx2pY sT.xY Ce x]esV ImxY xpox Tx'x'f tm.aY ppa.M[xIe No aw[ax�sx,ax[wa wm xtxvm '.v-c[x eh a p[Imax anst�[][o uwscw[[wsoixrs.m o[pW. mE WAE(n Icuro aF xxprn a��n[ iYp SeP+ave� Ep n' xwn,'NY V+.pp' E,e msw' nyos' wm',e' s+sr'aYi ,y.n' _ .A' Sfl paxn.epm,ee er axe n[eh�[emdw.Ma m,u[N•¢x xpy,vCx pFpr xar.e[xt n.xr w5.w' wp.5r .ax'n' spn[w� ,]ear _.,-�. g /L p^l�p A cla tbne.rx ,ee»• ,.Ye senr.eT MW x -W ,user [anp'a s[n[vsE ,[oar 13765 �' Trbrza .ee /` /ARDURRA s meersTx rT.pe' I epohrrVT YP 9ff roM1W fiat W+e'er mxm3ey2 pee.,r xpN H41EY ` ��®$ v repnx'isT t[i,5• _ IINHp N0.13]85 %@O11Li 3]t_FA. 11 N0i $, ��'� xee Lap YmY WPA,II)A[108p1ex a 1lxwwixuuRwLwM xnlww " BOOK ,PAGE SHEET NO.1 OF 3 Page 6 C. Landscape Plan(dated: 8/30/24) 3 �.® '-� FINAL PLAT UWOSGHPE PLANS FOR: _ VANGUARD VILLAGE SUBDNISION 3 � a wit z C9 y 0 No > U s CD 3 U' 3 Q J ... L0.00 ZZ --------- — _ \\\\ ONS LU O b Page 7 F—RE MITIr TIQN—Es EUU W.GRAND MOGUL WAY S- F 7\1 —W All WILLIAMS PIPELINE EASEMENT 0 S.LA VISTA LANE- 1.11.07-L1.08 SHEETS 1-1.09-L7.17 SHEETS z S.UMBRIA HILLS WAY- SHEETS 1-1.12-1-1.13 (D 0 < z Sl- 1-84 PATHW AY - SHEETS Ll I I L.1.15 Page 8 i 5 a C ± � Q m 0- Zw o � � 7 w z � a_ — Q LLIN j 0 (, o z a - o m= - 5 - - mo Qc s ®� 8 co Q 2 d C, ® � gz g < °o 0o z z g ®v L7.D4 Page 9 �F 8' � Q A A ma ------------ AW ® \cgs o > roc -....�16 Qram ncecvaw•°riexc�m. " � 8 � Q 7 a O�"s s"sussr<M.ss,susa �, � cai aw N � z z � 3 of o o Z P L10--------------------------------------------------- 0 ---------------------------------------------------- I -------------------- yw ` Q e 77 6 Q Ol s Q a.-. m�.. 0 O d ® agg N ; s 7 � � z �a 0 — L7.06 Page 10 I -- 111T I - - s — I m -I I I • © \ �44 LL o W a age a o 5 < L1.07 9 € a� J <��� - _ W - X• rn�x�au��ccnwsaff.w•� (D C) .ate ® r�J a C i`v�i 5 �n • cumn � � � Q.uxuruEm.rn. WQ a � U a � m O J Z Q m [il I j I- - � e ' IPEE PIANNNG lNTHIN BIGSWAIE L1.08 Page 11 -0 i a \ — — — _ \ 3� � \ cmc mwrnxw.c uurvrurE a 4 6 \ y-I o � \ - nwreRv�scneougE � m � SYM— DEsc — a Lu \ R NBC VERB Q W° w J � ° 5+� � rmuewrrtaas e � J m L1.09 0 1 \ o o il ®o e L1.10 Page 12 ............. ca 0, wl --------- Me I Q- od it < 00 V) 0 En < LLI ijo I- I---- I— F I. L1.12 Page 13 i +I G m f?" m Z L1.13 0. o ....,. ....,. sty E3 Z Y - _ Z m 00 a Z gs o - sl = � � 4 za ® z „ � p • Li ill Page 14 v ous 4w u IsA'I rc m e e l4m 9% o 0 a Ear pff o � w O a Z 4 I a L1.15 Page 15 D. Private Street Detail for S. La Vista Ln. d anaav ),VM VISIA VI F /� / 2i0�S�JNIMtl2i0 NOI1�f12i1SN0� a; i && Yj55 � d6 @ng 3�LL gy3g���[ 3(€E �3 4g q o pQ$o Wa� �o ¢ ®uCGd`ua4 zYrtE€e Rm RSe � Cs; W yea } � gggg �g 8 I �by3S3de� W3 RIBp2 No > O 3me ME CO e 1 pit 0 f I 1 I 11 _ ua� n V SSS 6 az 5$ O w r� Wd � Fed u o ❑�NO i d� ' � � � � a RS g W @ E R $ A @ i g $�� m 1 \ 1 Page 16 E. Street Section (2-Lane Commercial Street)—Not Approved H N 7 U A U ff 3 W � O U W Z J r N � J IL 4i of � F g , 6 Wi U K 7 7 3 Page 17 VI. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Planning Division Site Specific Conditions: 1. Applicant shall comply with all previous conditions of approval associated with this development(Vanguard Village MDA,RZ,PP, CUP H-2021-0081, DA Inst. #2022- 049799; H-2023-0072 (amended DA Inst. #2024-050341); TED-2024-0001). 2. The applicant shall obtain the City Engineer's signature on the subject final plat on or before May 3, 2026, or apply for a Council level time extension, in accord with UDC 11- 613-7. 3. Prior to submittal for the City Engineer's signature, have the Certificate of Owners and the accompanying acknowledgement signed and notarized. 4. The final plat prepared by Ardurra, stamped on 7/25/24 by Rob O'Malley, included in Exhibit B shall be revised as follows: a. Revise the boundary of the La Vista Way Sewer and Water Easement on Lots 1 and 4,Block 1 per ESMT-2024-0080; include the recorded instrument number(i.e. #2024-046602)of he easement in Note#9. b. Note#7: Change"Meridian 118"to"Vanguard Village"; delete the extra#7; include a statement that an encroachment permit shall be required for any improvements proposed within the Williams pipeline easement. c. Note#10: Include the recorded instrument number of the NMID easement. d. Note#12: Revise to include Lot 4 as being subject to the easements noted. e. Include the CP&F recorded instrument numbers graphically depicted on Sheet 1 of the plat. f. Revise notes#8, 11 and 12 to state landscaping within street buffers shall be maintained by the property owner or business owner's association, as applicable. g. Depict the east/west private street required between S.La Vista Ln. and S.Umbria Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr. in a perpetual ingress/egress easement. The easement width shall be wide enough to accommodate a travel lane width of 26 feet in accord with UDC 11-3174B.2b and 9-foot wide parallel parking on both sides of the street. h. Widen the north/south perpetual ingress/egress easement for S. La Vista Ln, a private street,to accommodate a travel lane width of 26-feet in accord with UDC 11-3F- 413.2b and 9-foot wide parallel parking on both sides of the street. i. Include a new note(or modify existing note#9) stating that all ingress/egress easements for private streets provide access to all properties served by such private streets. j. Depict the location of the Watkins Lateral easement if it lies on this site. 5. The landscape plan prepared by Ardurra, dated 8/30/24 included in Exhibit C, shall be revised as follows: a. Depict the cast/west private street with a minimum 10-foot wide street buffer along both sides between S. La Vista Ln. and S. Umbria Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr., landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C; include Page 18 calculations in the Landscape Calculations table demonstrating compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. b. Depict an additional minimum 5-foot wide area outside of the easement along W. Grand Mogul Way to accommodate the required street buffer landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.lb if the buffer is encompassed by an easement that prohibits trees; 19 additional trees shall be depicted in this area. c. Depict an additional minimum 5-foot wide area outside of the easement along the east side of S. La Vista Ln.to accommodate the required street buffer landscaping as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.1b.2 if the buffer is encompassed by an easement that prohibits trees;two(2) additional trees shall be depicted in this area. d. Correct the width of the street buffer for S.Umbria Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr. in the Landscape Calculations table;the width should be 20-feet on the east and west sides as it's a collector street. e. Depict a variety of trees, shrubs, lawn or other vegetative ground cover in all street buffers as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.3a. Lawn and other grasses requiring regular mowing shall comprise no more than sixty-five(65)percent of the vegetated coverage of a landscape buffer as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.3e. This maximum area excludes landscaped parkway with trees.All other vegetated coverage shall be mulched and treated as planting area for shrubs or other vegetative cover. f. Correct the tree mitigation note on Sheet L0.00 to read that the proposed mitigation trees totaling 462.5 caliper inches will all be provided within the boundary of the plat. Landscape plans submitted with Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications for development within this site shall depict these mitigation trees in addition to required trees. The majority of these trees will need to be installed within developed parcels at the time of construction because they won't all fit within the common lots or street buffers. Proposed locations are depicted on the plan;final location may need to be adjusted slighting during construction documents based on the future development plan for each lot. g. Depict dedicated crosswalks at the intersection with all streets with changes in color, markings,materials,texture and/or surface to distinguish them from the surrounding pavement as set forth in the TMISAP as allowed by ACHD_(see pg. 3-28, Crosswalks). h. Depict minimum 6-foot wide detached sidewalks along all streets in accord with the street sections(i.e. C and D)in the TMISAP, except for where multi-use pathways are required(i.e. along Grand Mogul and 1-84). i. Depict a berm in the street buffer along 1-84 in accord with the TMISAP for street buffers along transportation corridors(3.07.01 C); depict contours and/or include a note with the slope ratio of the berm. 6. Streetlights shall be required along S. Umbria Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr. and W. Grand Mogul Dr. in the tree lawn area at a pedestrian scale (see pg. 3-20, 3-22, 3-23) per preliminary plat condition#2.2d. 7. All streets shall be constructed as complete streets as defined in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-19 & 3-20). The following lists features that should be considered as a starting pint for each street: sidewalks, bike lanes, wide shoulders, crosswalks, refuge medians, bus pullouts, special bus lanes, raised crosswalks, audible pedestrian signals, sidewalk bulb-outs, street Page 19 furnishings, on-street parking. Features demonstrating compliance with this requirement shall be depicted on the plans. 8. Future development of the proposed lots is required to comply with the dimensional standards of the applicable zoning district in UDC Table 11-2B-3. 9. A 14-foot wide public use easement for the multi-use pathways within this site (i.e. along Vanguard, I-84 and the Williams Pipeline) shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to submittal for City Engineer signature on the final plat(s). 10. The private streets constructed within this subdivision shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Note: On-street parallel parking is allowed without approval of alternative compliance. 11. The private streets within this development shall be constructed within an easement wide enough to accommodate a travel lane width of 26-feet in accord with UDC 11-3F-413.2b, 9-foot wide parallel parking on both sides of the street and bulb-outs. A revised street section shall be submitted for S. La Vista Ln. and for the east/west private street required between La Vista and S. Umbria Hills Way/W. Navigator Dr. that demonstrates compliance with this requirement. 12. The private streets shall be constructed in accord with the roadway and storm drainage standards of the transportation authority or as approved by the City of Meridian based on plans submitted by a certified engineer as set forth in UDC 11-3F-4B.2a 13. A final street name approval letter shall be submitted for the east/west 2-lane commercial private street between S. La Vista Ln. and S. Umbria Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr. 14. A revised maintenance agreement shall be submitted that includes the east/west private street required between S. La Vista Ln. and S.Umbrian Hills Way/W.Navigator Dr. 15. All waterways on this site shall be piped as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B unless otherwise waived by City Council. 16. Public art in a high quality of design shall be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP(see pg. 3-47),as required by the development agreement. The Applicant shall submit a plan that depicts general locations of public art along with examples of the art proposed. Note: If a portion of the subject property is included in a subsequent plat, the public art planned in that portion may be provided with that plat. 17. Per requirement of the development agreement, an encroachment permit shall be required for any improvements proposed within the Williams pipeline easement. A copy of the executed encroachment agreement shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance for this site. 18. All existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. 19. The Applicant may submit a Design Review, Certificate of Zoning Compliance, and building permit application(s)prior to recordation of the final plat(s)for the lot on which a building is located; however, the Applicant will not receive the Certificate of Occupancy for any buildings prior to the recordation of the final plat for the lot on which the building is located per the amended Development Agreement. Page 20 20. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the preliminary plat and/or development agreement does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. See the Agency Comments folder in the public record for additional comments applicable to this development. VII.FINDINGS In order to approve the application, the Director shall find the following: A. The design of the private street meets the requirements of this Article; The Director finds if the Applicant complies with the conditions of approval contained herein, the design of the private streets will meet the requirements of this Article. B. Granting approval of the private street would not cause damage,hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity; and The Director finds granting approval of the private streets should not cause damage, hazard, or nuisance, or other detriment to persons,property, or uses in the vicinity. C. The use and location of the private street shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the Regional Transportation Plan. The Director finds the use and location of the private streets shall not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and/or the Regional Transportation Plan. D. The proposed residential development(if applicable)is a mew or gated development. This finding is not applicable. Page 21 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Purchase Order 25-0019 to Western States Equipment Company for Generator Parallel Switchgear Upgrade for Wastewater Resource Recovery Facility Power System Improvements for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$211,914.12 C� f1E RIDIA4, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Darren Brasseur, Procurement Division Meeting Date: October 8, 2024 Presenter: Consent Estimated Time: 5-10 min. Topic: Approval of PO #25-0019 to Western States Equipment Company for Generator Parallel Switchgear Upgrade For WRRF Power System Improvements for the Not-To- Exceed amount of$211,914.12 Recommended Council Action: Approval of PO #25-0019 to Western States Equipment Company for Generator Parallel Switchgear Upgrade For WRRF Power System Improvements for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$211,914.12 Background: This purchase order is written against the Council Approved Executed Sole Source for Western States Equipment Company per State Statute 67-2808 (ii) where the compatibility of equipment, components, accessories, computer software, replacement parts or service is the paramount consideration, and (viii) where competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. ESTIMATE 70fWESTERN 1 NO.:QID155638 STATES SERVICE CALL NO.: SC506206 ESTIMATE AMOUNT: $211,914.12 Meridian Truck ESTIMATE DATE:9/5/2024 400 E Overland Rd Meridian, ID 83642 ESTIMATE EXPIRES: 10/5/2024 208.947.4501 CUSTOMER NO.:5827000 CUSTOMER PO: WAREHOUSE: Meridian Truck City Of Meridian CONTACT PERSON: 33 E Broadway Ave Meridian, ID 83642-2619 PHONE: REPAIR LOCATION: 3401 N Ten Mile Rd Meridian, ID 83646-5409 MAKE MODEL SERIAL NUMBER CUSTOMER EQUIPMENT NUMBER LAST METER CAT 3412 DJN00541 GEN#2 WWTP 243 ESTIMATE SUMMARY LINE# SEGMENT DESCRIPTION PARTS LABOR MISC. TOTAL 1 001 Replace EMCP II plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#1 $25,222.28 $15,000.00 $100.00 $40,322.28 2 002 Sales Master Control&Sales Startup Labor $0.00 $9,600.00 $31,025.00 $40,625.00 3 004 Current Technologies-Breaker testing&Certify $0.00 $0.00 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 4 005 Replace EMCP II Plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#2 $25,222.28 $15,000.00 $100.00 $40,322.28 5 006 Replace EMCP II Plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#3 $25,222.28 $15,000.00 $100.00 $40,322.28 6 007 Replace EMCP II Plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#4 $25,222.28 $15,000.00 $100.00 $40,322.28 PARTS LABOR MISC. SUB-TOTALS $100,889.12 $69,600.00 $39,925.00 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY CHARGE $1,500.00 ESTIMATE AMOUNT $211,914.12 SALES TAX DISCLAIMER:Western States Equipment(WSE)is required to collect Sales Tax for sales made in the following states:ID,WA,ND,and WY. Prices above do not include any applicable state,county,city,or local sales taxes.This quotation is accepted with the understanding that such taxes and charges shall be added,as required by law,at the time this quotation is invoiced. Where applicable,WSE will charge sales tax unless you have a valid sales tax exemption certificate on file. Valid sales tax exempt certificates can be emailed to SalesTax@wseco.com to ensure a copy is on file prior to invoicing.In states where WSE is not required to collect and pay Sales Tax, the purchaser is obligated to self-report and pay the Sales and/or Use Tax to the purchasers appropriate state's and or local Department of Revenue. CUSTOMER INITIALS DATE PAGE: 1 OF 4 ESTIMATE WESTERN NO.:QID155638 r 1 STATES SERVICE CALL NO.: SC506206 Replace EMCP II plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#1 Estimate Notes: Upgrade EMCP Il+Panel with EMCP4.4 Panel. -On four(4)generator sets. PARTS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 MSC-TBC061324-1 Carter Kit EMCP4.4 25,222.28 25,222.28 LABOR Description Line Total Repair 15,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 Freight Charge 100.00 100.00 ......................................................................................................... Total Segment Parts 25,222.28 Total Segment Labor 15,000.00 Total Segment Miscellaneous 100.00 Segment 001 Total $40,322.28 Sales Master Control &Sales Startup Labor Estimate Notes: Provide one(1)Master Control Panel. Mounting of Master Control Panel is by OTHERS. Startup and testing of master control panel by WSECO. Wires from generators to the master control panel to the switchgear breakers and the Master Control panel are provided by OTHERS. Wire schedule telling how many wires and what type will be provided by WSECO after drawings are created. LABOR Description Line Total Repair 9,600.00 MISCELLANEOUS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 SVMI-Part Master Parallell Controller 31,025.00 31,025.00 ......................................................................................................... Total Segment Parts 0.00 Total Segment Labor 9,600.00 Total Segment Miscellaneous 31,025.00 Segment 002 Total $40,625.00 Current Technologies-Breaker testing &Certify Estimate Notes: Current Technologies injection testing and calibration on the four(4)generator breakers and the four(4)Switch gear breakers for proper operation and trip accuracy. (Pricing for spare breaker is still in process and NOT part of this quote.) MISCELLANEOUS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 Machine Work 8,500.00 8,500.00 ......................................................................................................... Total Segment Parts 0.00 Total Segment Labor 0.00 Total Segment Miscellaneous 8,500.00 Segment 004 Total $8,500.00 PAGE:2 OF 4 ESTIMATE WESTERN NO.:QID155638 r 1 STATES SERVICE CALL NO.: SC506206 Replace EMCP II Plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#2 Estimate Notes: Upgrade EMCP II+Panel with EMCP4.4 Panel. -On four(4)generator sets. PARTS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 MSC-TBC061324-1 Carter Kit EMCP4.4 25,222.28 25,222.28 LABOR Description Line Total Repair 15,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 Freight Charge 100.00 100.00 ......................................................................................................... Total Segment Parts 25,222.28 Total Segment Labor 15,000.00 Total Segment Miscellaneous 100.00 Segment 005 Total $40,322.28 Replace EMCP II Plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#3 Estimate Notes: Upgrade EMCP II+Panel with EMCP4.4 Panel. -On four(4)generator sets. PARTS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 MSC-TBC061324-1 Carter Kit EMCP4.4 25 222.28 25 222.28 LABOR Description Line Total Repair 15,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 Freight Charge 100.00 100.00 ......................................................................................................... Total Segment Parts 25,222.28 Total Segment Labor 15,000.00 Total Segment Miscellaneous 100.00 Segment 006 Total $40,322.28 Replace EMCP II Plus with EMCP4.4-Gen#4 Estimate Notes: Upgrade EMCP II+Panel with EMCP4.4 Panel. -On four(4)generator sets. PARTS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 MSC-TBC061324-1 Carter Kit EMCP4.4 25 222.28 25 222.28 LABOR Description Line Total Repair 15,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS Qty Part Number Description Unit Price Line Total 1 Freight Charge 100.00 100.00 PAGE:3 OF 4 ESTIMATE VWESTERN 1 NO.:QID155638 AY STATES SERVICE CALL NO.: SC506206 ......................................................................................................... Total Segment Parts 25,222.28 Total Segment Labor 15,000.00 Total Segment Miscellaneous 100.00 Segment 007 Total $40,322.28 Total Estimate Parts 100,889.12 Total Estimate Labor 69,600.00 Total Estimate Miscellaneous 39,925.00 Total Environmental Recovery Charge 1,500.00 Estimate Amount $211,914.12 CUSTOMER SIGNATURE DATE PAGE:4 OF 4 0 Idaho Statutes Idaho Statutes are updated to the website July 1 following the legislative session. TITLE 67 STATE GOVERNMENT AND STATE AFFAIRS CHAPTER 28 PURCHASING BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS 67-2808 . EMERGENCY EXPENDITURES AND SOLE SOURCE EXPENDITURES . Emergency expenditures . (a) The governing board of a political subdivision may declare that an emergency exists and that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money if: (i) There is a great public calamity, such as an extraordinary fire, flood, storm, epidemic, or other disaster; (ii) It is necessary to do emergency work to prepare for the national or local defense; or (iii) It is necessary to do emergency work to safeguard life, health, or property. (b) Upon making the declaration of emergency, any sum required in the emergency may be expended without compliance with formal bidding procedures . (2) Sole source expenditures . (a) The governing board of a political subdivision may declare that there is only one (1) vendor if there is only one (1) vendor for the public works construction, services, or personal property to be acquired. For purposes of this subsection, only one (1) vendor shall refer to situations where there is only one (1) source reasonably available and shall include, but not be limited to, the following situations : (i) Where public works construction, services, or personal property is required to respond to a life-threatening situation or a situation that is immediately detrimental to the public welfare or property; (ii) Where the compatibility of equipment, components, accessories, computer software, replacement parts, or service is the paramount consideration; (iii) Where a sole supplier' s item is needed for trial use or testing; (iv) The purchase of mass-produced movies, videos, books, or other copyrighted materials; (v) The purchase of public works construction, services, or personal property for which it is determined there is no functional equivalent; (vi) The purchase of public utility services; (vii) The purchase of products, merchandise, or trademarked goods for resale at a political subdivision facility; or (viii) Where competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous, or unreasonable under the circumstances . (b) Upon making the declaration that there is only one (1) vendor for public works construction, services, or personal property, unless the public works construction, services, or personal property is required for a life-threatening situation or a situation that is immediately detrimental to the public welfare or property, notice of a sole source procurement shall be published in the official newspaper of the political subdivision at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the award of the contract. (c) A sole source declaration made pursuant to the provisions of this subsection may be made without an emergency declaration under subsection (1) of this section. History: [67-2808, added 2005, ch. 213, sec. 37, p. 678; am. 2013, ch. 344, sec. 2, p. 928; am. 2019, ch. 115, sec. 1, p. 440 . ] How current is this law? (:�4`WEDIANI."_*�Nio) Purchase Order 10/14/2024 25-0019 Attention: David Briggs CITY OF MERIDIAN Billing Attn: Finance 33 Ave 33 EAST BROADWAY AVE. Meridian,Bro IDa Address: 83642 MERIDIAN,ID 83642 (208) 888-4433 Shipping City of Meridian Wastewater Vendor Address: Address: 3401 N.Ten Mile Meridian, ID 83646 WESTERN STATES EQUIPMENT CO PO BOX 3805 SEATTLE, WA 98124-3805 Shipping Method: Contractor FOB: Destination Pre-Paid Description Unit Quantity I Unit Price Total 25-0019 Generator Parallel Switchgear Upgrade For W RRF Dollar 1.00 211,914.12 211,914.12 Purchase Order Total: $211,914.12 Purchasing Manager: Special Instructions Generator Parallel Switchgear Upgrade For WRRF Power System Improvements Per Council Approved Executed Sole Source and WSEC Estimate#dtd. 9/5/2024 By Dick Klieint Not-To-Exceed $211,914.12 (65-3590-93000-11406.A) Ticket# 116678. City Of Meridian Detailed Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Detailed Statement of Rev and Exp Report - DB 65 - Wastewater Fund 3590 - WW Construction Projects From 10/l/2024 Through 9/30/2025 Percent of Budget with Current Year Budget Budget Amendments Actual Remaining Remaining Capital Outlay 93000 Improvements Other Than Bld 2,023,859.96 0.00 2,023,859.96 100.00% Total Capital Outlay 2,023,859.96 0.00 2,023,859.96 100.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,023,859.96 0.00 2,023,859.96 100.00% Date: 10/1/24 11:52:50 AM Page: 1 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approval of Sole Source for Omega Thermo Products for the Purchases of a Stainless-Steel Heated Hopper and Related Equipment and a Stainless-Steel Thermal Floor and Related Equipment C� f1E RIDIA4, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Keith Watts Meeting Date: 10/8/2024 Presenter: Consent Estimated Time: 5-10 Min. Topic: Approval of Sole Source for Omega Thermo Products Recommended Council Action: Approval of Sole Source Purchase of a Stainless-Steel Heated Hopper and related equipment and a Stainless-Steel Thermal Floor and related equipment from Omega Thermo Products. Competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. Background: Stainless-Steel Heated Hopper: The proprietary stainless-steel dry receiving hopper is constructed to allow hot water recirculation through the walls to act as a heat exchanger for further solids heating. This is a unique design that was developed between Brown and Caldwell and Omega Thermal Products and has been incorporated into the WRRF Biosolids plans and specifications. There are no known functional equivalent products on the market. Therefore,the Public Works Department requests a sole source procurement for the SST Dry Receiving Hopper per Idaho State Statute 67-2808 (viii) where competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. Stainless-Steel Thermal Floor: The proprietary stainless-steel thermal floor is designed to utilize the energy that is coming in via solar radiation, through the greenhouse, and transfer the heat energy through the floor into the biosolids being dried, which effectively reduces the required greenhouse size by approximately seventy five percent. It is capable of operating at a much higher temperature than a concrete heated floor and has significantly higher heat transfer than a concrete floor as well. This is a unique design that was developed between Brown and Caldwell and Omega Thermal Products and has been incorporated into the WRRF Biosolids plans and specifications. There are no known functional equivalent thermal floors on the market. Therefore, the Public Works Department requests a sole source procurement for the Omega Thermal Products - Stainless Steel Thermal Floor and related equipment per Idaho State Statute 67-2808 (viii) where competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. This equipment will be purchased by the City's Contractor for the WRRF Biosolids Dryer Project. 0 Idaho Statutes Idaho Statutes are updated to the website July 1 following the legislative session. TITLE 67 STATE GOVERNMENT AND STATE AFFAIRS CHAPTER 28 PURCHASING BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS 67-2808 . EMERGENCY EXPENDITURES AND SOLE SOURCE EXPENDITURES . Emergency expenditures . (a) The governing board of a political subdivision may declare that an emergency exists and that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money if: (i) There is a great public calamity, such as an extraordinary fire, flood, storm, epidemic, or other disaster; (ii) It is necessary to do emergency work to prepare for the national or local defense; or (iii) It is necessary to do emergency work to safeguard life, health, or property. (b) Upon making the declaration of emergency, any sum required in the emergency may be expended without compliance with formal bidding procedures . (2) Sole source expenditures . (a) The governing board of a political subdivision may declare that there is only one (1) vendor if there is only one (1) vendor for the public works construction, services, or personal property to be acquired. For purposes of this subsection, only one (1) vendor shall refer to situations where there is only one (1) source reasonably available and shall include, but not be limited to, the following situations : (i) Where public works construction, services, or personal property is required to respond to a life-threatening situation or a situation that is immediately detrimental to the public welfare or property; (ii) Where the compatibility of equipment, components, accessories, computer software, replacement parts, or service is the paramount consideration; (iii) Where a sole supplier' s item is needed for trial use or testing; (iv) The purchase of mass-produced movies, videos, books, or other copyrighted materials; (v) The purchase of public works construction, services, or personal property for which it is determined there is no functional equivalent; (vi) The purchase of public utility services; (vii) The purchase of products, merchandise, or trademarked goods for resale at a political subdivision facility; or (viii) Where competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous, or unreasonable under the circumstances . (b) Upon making the declaration that there is only one (1) vendor for public works construction, services, or personal property, unless the public works construction, services, or personal property is required for a life-threatening situation or a situation that is immediately detrimental to the public welfare or property, notice of a sole source procurement shall be published in the official newspaper of the political subdivision at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the award of the contract. (c) A sole source declaration made pursuant to the provisions of this subsection may be made without an emergency declaration under subsection (1) of this section. History: [67-2808, added 2005, ch. 213, sec. 37, p. 678; am. 2013, ch. 344, sec. 2, p. 928; am. 2019, ch. 115, sec. 1, p. 440 . ] How current is this law? PURCHASING AGENT W IDIAN~ 33 East Broadway Avenue C� Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208-888-4433 Fax: 208-887-4813 CITY OF MERIDIAN SOLE SOURCE FORM Date: August 26,2024 Item or Service: Omega Thermo Products - Stainless-Steel Thermal Floor, and Related Equipment. x Sole Source: Item is available from only one vendor. Item is one-of-a kind item and is not sold through distributors. Manufacturer is a sole distributor. Refer to instructions on 2"d page for completion. JUSTIFICATION: (Attach additional pages if needed) The stainless-steel thermal floor and related equipment by Omega Thermo Products utilizes energy that's coming in via solar radiation through the greenhouse and transfers heat energy through the floor into the biosolids being dried, which effectively reduces the required greenhouse size by approximately seventy five percent. It is capable of operating at a much higher temperature than a concrete heated floor and has significantly higher heat transfer than a concrete floor as well. There are no known functional equivalent thermal floors on the market that perform as this one does. Omega Thermo Products is the OEM Manufacturer and sells their products directly to customers exclusively, not sell through Distributors. Therefore, the City of Meridian requests a sole source procurement for the Omega Thermal Products Stainless Steel Thermal Floor and related equipment per Idaho State Statute 67-2808 (viii), where competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. CERTIFICATION: I am aware of the requirements set forth in the City's Purchasing Policy& Procedures Manual for competitive bidding and the established criteria for justification for sole source/sole brand purchasing. I have gathered technical information and have made a concerted effort to review comparable/equal equipment. I hereby certify as to the validity of the information and feel confident that this justification for sole source/sole brand meets the City's criteria and is accurate. 2��o,,,JK Council ApprovTb-8-2024 L �'Ji� lL�S Date: Re estor(Prin me ��) Procurement VIA Wai Approval: Department Manager Signature Procurement Manager PURCHASING AGENT fIEK�DIAN�--- 33 East Broadway Avenue C�l Meridian, ID 83642 Phone: 208-888-4433 Fax: 208-887-4813 CITY OF MERIDIAN SOLE SOURCE FORM Date: August 26,2024 Item or Service: Omega Thermo Products - Stainless-Steel Heated Hopper and Related Equipment x Sole Source: Item is available from only one vendor. Item is one-of-a kind item and is not sold through distributors. Manufacturer is a sole distributor. Refer to instructions on 2nd page for completion. JUSTIFICATION: (Attach additional pages if needed) The stainless-steel dry receiving heated hopper and related equipment by Omega Thermal Products is constructed to allow hot water recirculation through the walls to act as a heat exchanger for further solids heating. There are no known functional equivalent SST dry receiving hoppers on the market that are configured for hot water heating of dried biosolids as this product does. Omega Thermo Products is the OEM Manufacturer and sells their products directly to customers exclusively, not through Distributors. Therefore, the City of Meridian requests a sole source procurement the Omega Thermal Products Stainless Steel Heated Hopper and related equipment per Idaho State Statute 67-2808 (viii), where competitive solicitation is impractical, disadvantageous or unreasonable under the circumstances. CERTIFICATION: I am aware of the requirements set forth in the City's Purchasing Policy&Procedures Manual for competitive bidding and the established criteria for justification for sole source/sole brand purchasing. I have gathered technical information and have made a concerted effort to review comparable/equal equipment. I hereby certify as to the validity of the information and feel confident that this justification for sole source/sole brand meets the City's criteria and is accurate. Council Approval 0-8-2024 ,�,� .+ 3✓.S ��b� Date: kee6estor(Print-Nampi Procurement Ldit iva Approval: Department Manager Signature Procurement Manager V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve Award for the Equipment Agreement to Kurita America for Well 24 Filter for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$861,150 and Authorize Procurement Manager to Sign Resulting Purchase Order for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$861,150 C� f1E RIDIA4, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Sandra Ramirez, Procurement Div. Meeting Date: October 1, 2024 Presenter: N/A Estimated Time: 0.00 Topic: Well 24 Filter Equipment Recommended Council Action: Approve award for the equipment agreement to Kurita America for Well 24 Filter for the Not-to- Exceed amount of$861,150.00 and authorize Procurement Manager to sign resulting Purchase Order for the Not-to-Exceed amount of$861,150.00. Background: This agreement is the result of the formal RFP #PW-2425-11083.d,which closed on August 8, 2024. Kurita America was the only responding vendor. Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: E IDIAN Joe Borton, President � Liz Strader,Vice President Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts Luke Cavener TO: Keith Watts FROM: Brent Blake Engineering Project Manager DATE: October 1, 2024 SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE AND SUPPLY OF WELL 24 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER AND EQUIPMENT WITH TONKA WATER FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $886,500 I. DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSONS Brent A. Blake, Engineering Project Manager 208-489-0340 Kyle Radek, Assistant City Engineer 208-489-0343 Warren Stewart, City Engineer 208-489-0350 Laurelei McVey, PW Director 208-985-1259 II. DESCRIPTION A. Background The purpose of this project is to remove Iron, Manganese from water before it is supplied to customers. Iron and Manganese must be removed from supply water in order to provide adequate chlorine residuals in the distribution system without precipitation of these constituents which results in brown or black water stains. B. Project Description The overall project includes providing and installing a new iron and manganese removal filter system at the existing Well 24 facility. The filter system equipment will be housed inside a new building that must be designed after the filter and equipment is procured. III. IMPACT A. Fiscal Impacts Funding for this project is included in the FY 25 Budget. (See Purchasing Information for more detail.) B. Alternatives This project could be delayed if needed to defer cost, which would also delay the service improvement to customers. This project could be cancelled which would completely avoid costs, but result in no service improvement to customers. C. Time Constraints Council approval will enable the procurement of the filter equipment and completion of the design by the end of claendar year 2024. Departmental Approval: CONTRACT CHECKLIST I. PROJECT INFORMATION Date: 10/1/2024 REQUESTING DEPARTMENT Public Works Project Name: Well#24 Water Treatment (Filter Tank Procurement) Project Manager: Brent Blake Contract Amount: $861,150 Contractor/Consultant/Design Engineer: Tonka/Kurita Is this a change order? Yes ❑ No ❑ Change Order No. II. BUDGET INFORMATION (Project Manager to Complete) III. Contract Type Fund: 62 Budget Available(Purchasing attach report): Department 3490 Yes ❑� No ❑ Construction ❑ GL Account 96149 FY Budget: 2025 Task Order ❑ Project Number: 11083.b Enhancement: Yes 0 No ❑ Professional Service ❑ Equipment ❑ Will the project cross fiscal years? Yes❑ No ✓❑ Grant ❑ IV. GRANT INFORMATION-to be completed only on Grant funded projects Grant#: Wage Determination Received Wage Verification 10 Days prior to bid due date Debarment Status(Federal Funded) N/A Print and Attach the determination Print,attach and amend bid by addendum(if changed) www.sam.gov Print and attach V. BASIS OF AWARD BID RFP/RFQ TASK ORDER Award based on Low Bid Highest Ranked Vendor Selected Master Agreement Category N/A (Bid Results Attached) Yes ❑ No ❑ (Ratings Attached) Yes ❑No Date MSA Roster Approved: Typical Award Yes 0 No ❑ If no please state circumstances and conclusion: Only one vendor bid on the solicitation Date Award Posted: 7 day protest period ends: VI. CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT REQUIRED INFORMATION PW License N/A Expiration Date: Corporation Status Active-Goodstanding Insurance Certificates Received(Date): N/A Expiration Date: Rating: Payment and Performance Bonds Received(Date): 9/30/2024 Rating: Builders Risk Ins.Req'd: Yes ❑ No J❑ If yes,has policy been purchased? N/A (Only applicabale for projects above$1,000,000) VII. TASK ORDER SELECTION (Project Manager to Complete) Reason Consultant Selected ❑ 1 Performance on past projects Check all that apply ❑ Quality of work ❑ On Budget ❑On Time ❑ Accuracy of Construction Est ❑ 2 Qualified Personnel ❑ 3 Availability of personnel ❑ 4 Local of personnel Description of negotiation process and fee evaluation: Enter Supervisor Name Date Approve Vill. AWARD INFORMATION Date Submitted to Clerk for Agenda: October 1,2024 Approval Date 10-8-2024 By: CitV Council Purchase Order No.: Date Issued: WH5 submitted (Only for PW Construction Projects) NTP Date: Contract Request Checklist.5.24.2016.Final City Of Meridian Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Rev and Exp Report - Sandra 62 - Water Fund 3490 - Water Construction Projects From 10/1/2024 Through 9/30/2025 Budget with Current Year Budget Amendments Actual Remaining Capital Outlay 96149 Well 24 Construction 1,404,260.96 0.00 1,404,260.96 Total Capital Outlay 1,404,260.96 0.00 1,404,260.96 DEPT EXPENDITURES 1,404,260.96 0.00 1,404,260.96 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,404,260.96 0.00 1,404,260.96 Date: 9/17/24 07:49:31 AM Page: 1 AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF WELL 24 WATER TREATMENT FILTER PROJECT #11083A THIS AGREEMENT FOR EQUIPMENT/ SUPPLIES PROCUREMENT is made this 10th day of October, 2024, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and Kurita America, hereinafter referred to as "SUPPLIER", whose business address is 6600 94' Ave. N Minneaaolis, Minnesota 55445. INTRODUCTION Whereas, the City has a need for WELL 24 FILTER; and WHEREAS, the SUPPLIER is specially trained, experienced and competent to provide and has agreed to provide such equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Equipment/ Supply Specifications & Requirements: 1.1 SUPPLIER shall supply the equipment, supplies and services to the City upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all items, and comply in all respects, as specified in the Request for Proposals titled "Well 24 Water Treatment Filter" and suppliers proposal dated August 8, 2024, which by this reference are incorporated herein, together with all addendums issued. 1.2 The SUPPLIER shall provide all equipment and services under this Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal, state and city laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions and the UCC. The SUPPLIER represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this Agreement. 2. Consideration 2.1 The SUPPLIER shall be compensated on a Fixed Price basis as provided in Attachment B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof, for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $861,150.00. 2.2 The SUPPLIER shall provide the City with a detailed invoice upon delivery of all equipment and supplies, which the City will pay within 30 days of receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City Project Manager. The City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by City to SUPPLIER under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of SUPPLIER. 2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, SUPPLIER shall not be entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement., including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, SUPPLIER shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever. 3. Term: 3.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and shall expire upon (a) completion of the agreed upon work, or (b) unless sooner terminated as provided below or unless some other method or time of termination is listed in Attachment A. 3.2 Should SUPPLIER default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to SUPPLIER. 3.3 Should City fail to pay SUPPLIER all or any part of the compensation set forth in Attachment B of this Agreement on the date due, SUPPLIER, at the SUPPLIER's option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due. 4. Termination: If, through any cause, SUPPLIER, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, or if the City Council determines that termination of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY, the CITY shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to SUPPLIER of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. Notwithstanding the above, SUPPLIER shall not be relieved of liability to the CITY for damages sustained by the CITY by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by SUPPLIER, and the CITY may withhold any payments to SUPPLIER for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the CITY from SUPPLIER is determined. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve SUPPLIER of its liability to the CITY for damages. 5. Independent SUPPLIER: 5.1 In all matters pertaining to this agreement, SUPPLIER shall be acting as an independent SUPPLIER, and neither SUPPLIER nor any officer, employee or agent of SUPPLIER will be deemed an employee of CITY. Except as expressly provided in Attachment A, SUPPLIER has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and designation of the personnel of the CITY in the performance of this agreement shall be made by the CITY. 5.2 SUPPLIER, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent SUPPLIERs and not as employees of the City. 5.3 SUPPLIER shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by SUPPLIER under this Agreement. SUPPLIER shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of SUPPLIER in fulfillment of this Agreement. If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by SUPPLIER, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the SUPPLIER. 6. Indemnification and Insurance: a. SUPPLIER shall indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY from and for any and all losses, claims, actions,judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the SUPPLIER, its servants, agents, officers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortuous conduct of CITY or its employees. SUPPLIER shall maintain, and specifically agrees that it will maintain, throughout the term of this Agreement, liability insurance, in which the CITY shall be named an additional insured in the minimum amounts as follow: General Liability One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence, Professional Liability One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence, Automobile Liability Insurance One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation Insurance, in the statutory limits as required by law.. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY; and if CITY becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided, SUPPLIER covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless CITY from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the SUPPLIER or SUPPLIER's officers, employs, agents, representatives or sub-SUPPLIERs and resulting in or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property, including use of. SUPPLIER shall provide CITY with a Certificate of Insurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing SUPPLIER'S compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the CITY at least ten (10) days prior to the date SUPPLIER begins performance of it's obligations under this Agreement. In the event the insurance minimums are changed, SUPPLIER shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. Evidence of all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to Meridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 6.2 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared in writing and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles, self-insured retentions or named insureds; or the SUPPLIER shall provide a bond, cash or letter of credit guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 6.3 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, SUPPLIER's Insurance coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by the City or the City's elected officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the SUPPLIER's insurance and shall not contribute with SUPPLIER's insurance except as to the extent of City's negligence. b. The SUPPLIER's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 6.4 All insurance coverages for Suppliers subs shall be subject to all of the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein. 6.5 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Supplier and Supplier's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 6.6 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 7. Bonds: Payment and Performance Bonds are required. 8. Warranty: In addition to any warranty required in the specifications, all equipment, coatings, valves, controls, and other components provided under this agreement shall be guaranteed for two (2) years against defects in workmanship and materials from the notice of acceptance. 9. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: City of Meridian Procurement Manager 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Ph. (208)489-0417 Email: kwattsC@rneridiancity.org KURITA AMERICA Attn: Steve VFaVo Alan Schneider 6600 94t" Ave N Minneapolis, Minnesota 55445 Ph.: 65?-47 _4290--- 612-708-6517 e-mail: s.ma oo(aD_kurita-water.com Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 9. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 10. Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. 11. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that SUPPLIER shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of CITY. 12. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Work required herein, SUPPLIER shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 13. Reports and Information: 13.1 At such times and in such forms as the CITY may require, there shall be furnished to the CITY such statements, records, reports, data and information as the CITY may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. 13.2 SUPPLIER shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof. 14. Audits and Inspections: At any time during normal business hours and as often as the CITY may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the CITY for examination all of SUPPLIER'S records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. SUPPLIER shall permit the CITY to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. 15. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The CITY shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 16. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of work required hereunder, SUPPLIER shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. 17. Changes: The CITY may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Work to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of SUPPLIER'S compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the CITY and SUPPLIER, shall be incorporated in written amendments which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement. 18. Construction and Severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. 19. Waiver of Default: Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided above. 20. Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. It has received independent legal advice from its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such advice. 21. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. 22. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation for Bid document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document. 23. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 24. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN KURITA AMERICA BY: BY: ve, (�;___ Keith Watts, Procurement Manager Mary Sitko` SVP, Industrial & Municipal Capital Projects Dated: Dated: 9/30/24 10-8-2024 Approved by City Council: Approved as to Form CITY ATTORNEY ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF WORK REFER TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PW-2425-11083.d. ALL ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the Request for Proposals Package and written proposal by SUPPLIER dated AUGUST 8, 2024 are by this reference made a part hereof. • Specifications titled - Well 24 Water Treatment Project dated June 2024 by JUB Engineers. CITY OF MERIDIAN MERIDIAN, IDAHO SPECIFICATIONS for the Equipment Procurement in support of WELL 24 WATER TREATMENT PROJECT JUNE 2024 ENGINEER: OWNER: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. CITY OF MERIDIAN, ID 2760 W. Excursion, Suite 400 33 E. Broadway Ave. Meridian, ID 83642 Meridian, ID 83642 Telephone: (208) 376-7330 June 2024 This page intentionally blank. June 2024 SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO WELL 24 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY- FILTER EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT (Owner Project 11083.c) J U N E 2024 J-U-B ENGINEERs, Inc. (J-U-B Project No.: 10-23-091) pN A 847 .J, o i9U R. W A'X`'� 6 - Original on file at 2760 W. Excursion, Suite 400, Meridian, ID 83642 NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER THE PLANS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS(DOCUMENTS)ARE THE PROPERTY OF J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. ("J-U-B") AND BY USING THE DOCUMENTS YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THIS NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER. THE USE OF THE DOCUMENTS CREATES NO DUTY IN CONTRACT,TORT, EQUITY OR OTHERWISE OF J-U-B TO THE USER. THE USER SHALL NOT(1) DISSEMINATE THE DOCUMENTS, OR ANY PART THEREOF, TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF J-U-B, OR (II) USE THE DOCUMENTS,OR ANY PART THEREOF, FOR ANY USE OTHER THAN AS DESIGNATED HEREIN FOR THE INTENDED PROJECT. THE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN CREATING DTM FOR GRADING OR EARTHWORK, SURVEY STAKING LAYOUT(UNLESS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS SUCH IN THE DOCUMENTS),OR PROPERTY BOUNDARY LAYOUTS. J-U-B AND ITS AGENTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OR CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE UNAUTHORIZED USE OR MISUSE OF THE DOCUMENTS,OR ANY PART THEREOF,WHETHER SUCH DAMAGE OR CLAIM IS BASED IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE. THE USER HEREBY RELEASES AND SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD J-U-B AND ITS AGENTS HARMLESS FROM ANY DAMAGES OR CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF, OR RELATED IN ANY WAY TO, THE USER'S UNAUTHORIZED USE OR MISUSE OF THE DOCUMENTS, OR ANY PART THEREOF. IF THE DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT, THE ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF J-U-B's"ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT/DATA LIMITED LICENSE"FOUND AT edocs.iub.com June 2024 This page intentionally blank. June 2024 SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 1 — GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Section 01010— Summary of Work Section 01025— Measurement and Payment Section 01028— Change Order Procedures Section 01030—Alternates Section 01090— Reference Standards Section 01300— Submittals Section 01400—Quality Control Section 01410— Supplier's Services Section 01600— Material and Equipment Section 01700— Contract Closeout Section 01730—Operations and Maintenance Information DIVISION 11 — EQUIPMENT Section 11100— Iron and Manganese Removal Filter System APPENDIX A—WELL 24 PILOT TEST REPORT APPENDIX B - CITY OF MERIDIAN DESIGN CHECKLIST June 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS This page intentionally blank. June 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 01010 SUMMARY OF WORK PART GENERAL 1.1 DEFINITIONS A. OWNER: City of Meridian, ID. B. SUPPLIER: entity, organization, or company selected to furnish iron and manganese removal water filtration equipment. C. CONTRACTOR: contractor installing the equipment under a separate contract. D. ENGINEER: J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 1.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK A. One entity, organization, or company, denoted as the SUPPLIER in the Specifications herein, shall be selected to furnish water filtration equipment and materials required for the Meridian Well 24 Iron and Manganese Removal Project. B. Well 24 operates with a variable frequency drive. The design of the filter system will allow operation at full flow conditions without exceeding the maximum forward loading rates listed in Specification Section 11100. Bypass piping and control valve will be provided by the CONTRACTOR. C. The City of Meridian, ID, denoted as the OWNER in the Specifications herein, will award this contract to one SUPPLIER based on selection criteria outlined in the Request For Proposals. D. The CONTRACTOR will be awarded the overall construction contract by the OWNER at a later date and following this SUPPLIER selection. E. The overall project (by SUPPLIER and CONTRACTOR)will include providing and installing a new iron and manganese removal filter system at the OWNER's existing Well 24 facility, which is a groundwater well for potable supply. The filter system equipment will be housed inside of a new separate building. The well water will be oxidized with sodium hypochlorite before the filter system and wasted backwash water will be discharged to the OWNER's sanitary sewer system. 1.3 LOCATION A. Address: 2860 N. Blue Springs Ave., Meridian, ID 83646 B. Latitude/Longitude: 43' 37'50.7" N, 116' 24' 50.7" W C. Approximate Ground Elevation: 2568 feet MSL June 2024 SECTION 01010-1 SUMMARY OF WORK 1.4 WORK INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT A. The SUPPLIER shall provide the OWNER with a complete iron and manganese removal filtration system in accordance with the Contract Documents. This Work includes the following SUPPLIER responsibilities: 1. Providing complete assemblies and equipment in accordance with the Specifications herein, including the cost of shipping to the project site. 2. Provide all equipment and materials required for a properly functional filtration system which meets the performance and prescriptive requirements set forth in Section 11100, Iron and Manganese Removal Filter System. B. The SUPPLIER shall also provide the following services to the OWNER and /or CONTRACTOR: 1. Detailed design drawings of the filtration system following SUPPLIER selection and contract award. 2. Operation and maintenance manuals and technical information for any equipment and materials provided as part of this Work. Technical information will be requested by the OWNER on an as- needed basis and may include equipment specifications, material composition, backwash flowrate estimates, power demand estimates, etc. See Section 01730, Operations and Maintenance Information. 3. Installation support during construction of the overall facility and installation of the equipment, startup services for the equipment and materials provided as part of the Work, including coordination with the CONTRACTOR during installation, testing and commissioning, and onsite training of City staff for the operation and maintenance of the filtration system. See Section 01410, Manufacturer's Services. C. The SUPPLIER shall perform this Work within the following schedule: 1. Refer to Part II of the contract for overall project schedule. 2. Refer to Section 01300 for submittal requirements. 1.5 WORK NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CONTRACT A. The SUPPLIER shall not be responsible for the following Work, which is to be provided by the CONTRACTOR later and under a separate contract with the OWNER: 1. The offloading and storage of equipment and materials at the Site, upon inspection and acceptance by the OWNER. June 2024 SECTION 01010-2 SUMMARY OF WORK 2. Installation of all equipment and materials specified herein. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01010-3 SUMMARY OF WORK This page intentionally blank. June 2024 SECTION 01010-4 SUMMARY OF WORK SECTION 01025 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT PART GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300—Submittals B. Section 01420—Supplier's Services C. Section 11100— Iron and Manganese Removal Filter System 1.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT A. Measurement and Payment for this Work shall be based on the following milestones and corresponding payments (Refer to contract for% of total bid): 1. The SUPPLIER shall receive 20% of total contract amount upon submittal of and OWNER approval of the following: a) Final shop drawings and calculations. b) All product information. c) Performance guarantee. 2. The SUPPLIER shall receive 60% of total contract amount upon submittal of and OWNER approval of the following submittals and completion of the following services: a) Delivery, inspection, and OWNER acceptance of all equipment and materials supplied under this Work. b) Final versions of all other submittals specified herein. 3. The SUPPLIER shall receive 10% of total contract amount upon submittal of and OWNER approval of the following submittals and completion of the following services: a) Installation inspection and final Certificate of Proper Installation. b) Start-up services. c) Field training of OWNER staff. 4. The SUPPLIER shall receive the remaining 10% of total contract amount upon submittal of and OWNER approval of the following submittals and completion of the following services: a) Advisement services during 60-day OWNER-operated trial period. June 2024 SECTION 01025-1 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT b) All other services specified herein. c) Close-out of this Work in accordance with Section 01700. 5. OWNER payments to SUPPLIER will be in accordance with terms and conditions on Contract Documents. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01025-2 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT SECTION 01028 CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES PART GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01025—Measurement and Payment. B. Section 01300—Submittals. C. Section 01700—Contract Closeout. 1.2 SUBMITTALS A. Submit name of the individual authorized to receive change documents and be responsible for informing others in SUPPLIER'S employ or Subcontractors of changes to the Work. B. Change Order Forms: use Change Order Form provided with contract, if provided. 1.3 DOCUMENTATION OF CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE AND CONTRACT TIME A. Maintain detailed records of work done on a time and material basis. Provide full information required for evaluation of proposed changes, and to substantiate costs of changes in the Work. B. Document each quotation for a change in cost or time with sufficient data to allow evaluation of the quotation. C. On request, provide additional data to support computations: 1. Quantities of products, labor, and equipment. 2. Taxes, insurance and bonds. 3. Overhead and profit. 4. Justification for any change in Contract Time. 5. Credit for deletions from Contract, similarly documented. D. Support each claim for additional costs, and for work done on a time and material basis, with additional information: 1. Origin and date of claim. 2. Dates and times work was performed, and by whom. 3. Time records and wage rates paid. 4. Invoices and receipts for products, equipment, and subcontracts, similarly documented. June 2024 SECTION 01028-1 CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES 1.4 CHANGE PROCEDURES A. The ENGINEER will advise of minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment to Contract Price or Contract Time by issuing a field order. B. The ENGINEER may issue a Notice of Change which includes a detailed description of a proposed change with supplementary or revised Drawings and specifications, a change in Contract Time for executing the change with a stipulation of any overtime work required and the period of time during which the requested price will be considered valid. SUPPLIER will prepare and submit an estimate within five (5) days. C. The SUPPLIER may propose a change by submitting a request for change to the ENGINEER, describing the proposed change and its full effect on the Work, with a statement describing the reason for the change, and the effect on the Contract Price and Contract Time with full documentation and a statement describing the effect on Work by separate or other suppliers. Document any requested substitutions in accordance with Section 01300. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION CHANGE AUTHORIZATION A. ENGINEER may issue a Work Change Directive or other authorization, signed by the OWNER instructing the SUPPLIER to proceed with a change in the Work, for subsequent inclusion in a Change Order. B. The document will describe changes in the Work and will designate method of determining any change in Contract Price or Contract Time. C. Promptly execute the change in Work. 1.6 STIPULATED PRICE CHANGE ORDER A. Based on Notice of Change and SUPPLIER's fixed price quotation or SUPPLIER's request for a Change Order as approved by OWNER. 1.7 UNIT PRICE CHANGE ORDER A. For pre-determined unit prices and estimated quantities, the Change Order will be executed on a fixed unit price basis. B. For unit costs or quantities of units of work, which are not pre-determined, execute Work under a Change Order. C. Changes in Contract Price or Contract Time will be computed as specified for Time and Material Change Order. 1.8 TIME AND MATERIAL CHANGE ORDER A. Submit itemized account and supporting data after completion of change, within time limits indicated in the Conditions of the Contract. B. ENGINEER will recommend to the OWNER the change allowable in June 2024 SECTION 01028-2 CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES Contract Price and Contract Time as provided in the Contract Documents. C. Maintain detailed records of work done on Time and Material basis. D. Provide full information required for evaluation of proposed changes, and to substantiate costs for changes in the Work. 1.9 EXECUTION OF CHANGE ORDERS A. Execution of Change Orders: OWNER will issue Change Orders for signatures of parties as provided in the Conditions of the Contract. 1.10 CORRELATION OF SUPPLIER SUBMITTALS A. Promptly revise Application for Payment forms to record each authorized Change Order as a separate line item and adjust the Contract Price. B. Promptly revise progress schedules to reflect any change in Contract Time, revise sub-schedules to adjust time for other items of work affected by the change and resubmit. C. Promptly enter changes in Project Record Documents. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01028-3 CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES This page intentionally blank. June 2024 SECTION 01028-4 CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURES SECTION 01030 ALTERNATES PART1 GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300—Submittals. 1.2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS A. Submit alternates to ENGINEER with full description of the proposed Alternate and the effect on adjacent or related components including justification as an "or equal" item and documentation that it meets all specification and performance requirements. B. Document all effects on project cost and project schedule associated with acceptance of submitted alternate. C. Submit in accordance with Section 01300 - Submittals. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01030-1 ALTERNATES This page intentionally blank. June 2024 SECTION 01030-2 ALTERNATES SECTION 01090 REFERENCE STANDARDS PART GENERAL 1.1 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. Work under this project shall comply with the following Contract Documents listed below from highest precedence to lowest (in case of conflict, the higher precedence document will control): 1. These Technical Specifications. 2. City of Meridian Electrical Standards, Specifications and Drawings, February 2023 (provided upon request). 3. 2024 City of Meridian Public Works Water Facilities Design Checklist(Appendix B). 4. 2023 City of Meridian Design Standards. (https:Hmeridiancity.org/media/mkoIbdtr/2023-design-standards-draft- changes-for-review-and-comment.pdf) 5. 2023 Edition of the City of Meridian Supplemental Specifications and Drawings to the ISPWC, and subsequent amendments thereto (.https://meridiancitV.org/community-development/land/standards- specifications-and-drawings/) 6. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME): Section VIII, Division 1, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. 7. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Manual 7-16, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Building and Other Structures. 8. American Water Works Association (AWWA). a. B100: Granular Filter Material b. C110: Ductile Iron and Gray Iron Fittings c. C115: Flanged Ductile Iron Pipe with Ductile Iron or Gray Iron Threaded Flanges d. D102: Coating Steel Water-Storage Tanks 9. American Welding Society (AWS): D1.1, Structural Welding Code— Steel. 10. The Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC): a. Surface Preparation Specification No. 6: Commercial Blast Cleaning b. Surface Preparation Specification No. 10: Near White Blast Cleaning June 2024 SECTION 01090-1 REFERENCE STANDARDS 11. State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality(IDEQ): IDAPA 58, Title 1, Chapter 8: Rules of Public Drinking Water Systems. 12. National Electrical Code (NEC). 13. National Electrical Manufacturer's Association (NEMA). 14. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 15. Underwriters Laboratories (UL). 1.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. For products or workmanship specified by association, trade, or Federal Standard, comply with requirements of the standard, except when more rigid requirements are specified or are required by applicable codes. B. Conform to reference standard by the most recent date of issue. C. Maintain copy at jobsite during submittals, planning, and progress of the specific work, until Substantial Completion. D. Should specified reference standards conflict with Contract Documents, request clarification from ENGINEER before proceeding. E. The contractual relationship of the parties to the Contract shall not be altered from the Contract Documents by mention or inference otherwise in any reference document. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01090-2 REFERENCE STANDARDS SECTION 01300 SUBMITTALS PART GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01400—Quality Control. B. Section 11100— Iron and Manganese Removal Filter System 1.2 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES A. Deliver submittals to the OWNER and to the ENGINEER via email or other mutually agreed upon electronic platform. B. Provide submittals required in each technical specification or as called for elsewhere in the Contract Documents. C. Transmit each submittal in the format described in the Contract Documents. Submittals not in accepted format will be returned for correction without ENGINEER's review. D. Identify Project, SUPPLIER, Subcontractor or supplier; pertinent Drawing sheet and detail name or number(s), and specification Section number, as appropriate. E. Apply SUPPLIER's stamp, signed or initialed, certifying that review, verification of Products required, field dimensions, adjacent construction Work, and coordination of information, is in accordance with the requirements of the Work and Contract Documents. F. Schedule submittals to expedite the Project and deliver to OWNER. Coordinate submission of related items. G. Identify variations from Contract Documents and Product or system limitations. H. Revise and resubmit submittals as required, identifying all changes made since previous submittal. 1.3 CONTRACT PROGRESS SCHEDULES A. Incorporate the work described herein into contract progress schedules and submit and update schedules per the Contract Documents. B. Submit revised schedules with each Application for Payment identifying changes since previous version. June 2024 SECTION 01300-1 SUBMITTALS 1.4 PROPOSED PRODUCTS LIST A. For products specified only by reference, give manufacturer, trade name, model or catalog designation, and reference standards. 1.5 SHOP DRAWINGS A. Within thirty(30) days after date of execution of the OWNER-SUPPLIER agreement, SUPPLIER shall submit submittals and preliminary shop drawings including tank layout, dimensions, anchoring details, and supplied valving. B. Within fourteen (14) days after ENGINEER's return of each reviewed submittal, submit revised final submittals.. 1.6 PRODUCT DATA A. Mark each submittal to identify applicable products, models, options, and other data. Supplement manufacturers' standard data to provide information unique to this Project. B. Indicate product utility characteristics, utility connection requirements, and location of utility outlets for service for functional equipment and appliances. 1.7 MANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS A. Submit manufacturers' printed instructions for delivery, storage, assembly, installation, start-up, adjusting, and finishing, in quantities specified for Product Data. B. Indicate special procedures, perimeter conditions requiring special attention, and special environmental criteria required for application or installation. C. Identify conflicts between manufacturers' instructions and Contract Documents. 1.8 MANUFACTURERS' CERTIFICATES A. When specified in individual specification Sections, submit manufacturer's certificate to ENGINEER for review. B. Indicate material or product conforms to or exceeds specified requirements. Submit supporting reference date, affidavits, and certifications as appropriate. C. Certificates may be recent or previous test results on material or product but must be acceptable to ENGINEER. 1.9 QUALITY CONTROL SUBMITTALS A. When specified in individual specification Sections, submit quality control submittals to ENGINEER for review and approval. June 2024 SECTION 01300-2 SUBMITTALS B. Functional and performance testing submittals shall include all collected data. 1.10 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SUBMITTALS A. Transmit draft operation and maintenance information in accordance with Submittal Procedures specified in this Section. B. Submit in accordance with Section 01730. 1.11 CONSTRUCTION PHOTOGRAPHS A. None required. 1.12 RECORD DRAWINGS A. Submit record drawings of equipment as delivered. 1.13 SUBMITTAL LIMITS A. Two submittals will be permitted for each item in this section at no cost to the SUPPLIER. The two submittals include one initial submittal and one resubmittal. B. All submittals requiring a third review by the ENGINEER shall be considered unresponsive and the OWNER will charge the SUPPLIER on a Time and Materials basis for the third and all subsequent reviews and all related administrative costs not to exceed $1,000.00 for each resubmittal. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01300-3 SUBMITTALS This page intentionally blank. June 2024 SECTION 01300-4 SUBMITTALS SECTION 01400 QUALITY CONTROL PART GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01090— Reference Standards. B. Section 01300—Submittals. C. Section 11100— Iron and Manganese Removal Filter System. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. SUPPLIER's Representative: an individual qualified to represent the SUPPLIER in the field. Specific tasks within this Specification require the representative to be qualified to inspect equipment installation, train OWNER on equipment operation, or test equipment performance. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL OF INSTALLATION A. Experience 1. SUPPLIER: a) Regularly engaged in the design and manufacture of the filter system equipment and shall have manufactured the specified filter assemblies for at least five years. b) Provide a list of at least five similar iron and manganese removal facilities, including name and contact information, that have been successfully meeting manganese removal goals over the last five years. 2. SUPPLIER's Representative: a) Has overseen the installation and start-up of not less than five filter systems of similar type and size as this Work. b) The representative must be qualified to represent all equipment and materials provided by SUPPLIER, or SUPPLIER shall provide Manufacturer representatives for specific specialized equipment. B. Provide detailed and timely installation instructions to CONTRACTOR, including each step in sequence. June 2024 SECTION 01400-1 QUALITY CONTROL 1.4 REFERENCES A. Conform to referenced standards current on date of Request for Qualifications. B. If specified reference standards conflict with Contract Documents, request clarification from ENGINEER before proceeding. C. The contractual relationship of the parties to the Contract shall not be altered from the Contract Documents except as expressly described in the Request for Qualifications and Agreement executed by the OWNER and the Supplier. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01400-2 QUALITY CONTROL SECTION 01410 SUPPLIER'S SERVICES PART GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01090— Reference Standards. B. Section 01300—Submittals. C. Section 11100— Iron and Manganese Removal Filter System. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. SUPPLIER's Representative: an individual qualified to represent the SUPPLIER in the field. Specific tasks within this Specification require the representative to be qualified to inspect equipment installation, train OWNER on equipment operation, and test equipment performance. 1.3 SUPPLIER'S FIELD SERVICES A. General 1. Furnish manufacturer's representative(s)for installation inspection, starting of systems, performance testing, demonstration and instructions and trial facility support for the minimum number of days listed below(travel time excluded): a) Installation inspection: three (3) days; b) Starting of systems: two (2) days; c) Performance testing: two (2)days d) Demonstration and instructions: two (2) days; e) Trial facility support: 60 days (available for advisement to the OWNER). B. Installation Inspection 1. SUPPLIER's representative shall inspect installation of all provided equipment and materials and provide technical information regarding installation and start-up. Multiple site visits may be necessary and be coordinated with CONTRACTOR. The SUPPLIER's representative shall only advise the CONTRACTOR and OWNER and shall not supervise or direct CONTRACTOR work. The qualified representative will observe site conditions, conditions of surfaces and installation, quality of workmanship, start-up of equipment, test, adjust, and balance of equipment as applicable, and to initiate instructions when necessary. SUPPLIER's representative shall respond to CONTRACTOR inspection requests June 2024 SECTION 01410-1 MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES within three (3) days and provide schedule of inspection availability. 2. SUPPLIER'S representative will report, in writing, observations and site decisions or instructions given to applicators or installers that are supplemental or contrary to manufacturers'written instructions. 3. Transmit report in accordance with Section 01300 within fifteen (15) days of observation to ENGINEER for review. C. Starting Systems 1. Notify ENGINEER and OWNER seven (7) days prior to start-up of each system. 2. SUPPLIER'S representative shall be present for equipment startup and will provide manufacturer's startup instructions to CONTRACTOR prior to startup. The representative will advise the CONTRACTOR during equipment startup. 3. Coordinate schedule for start-up of various equipment and systems with CONTRACTOR. 4. Verify that each piece of equipment or system has been checked for proper lubrication, control sequence, or other conditions which may cause damage. 5. Verify that tests, meter readings, and specified electrical characteristics agree with those required by the equipment or system manufacturer. 6. Verify wiring and support components for equipment are complete and tested. 7. Execute start up under supervision of responsible manufacturer's representative in accordance with manufacturers' instructions. 8. When specified in individual specification sections, manufacturer will provide an authorized representative to be present at site to inspect, check and approve equipment or system installation prior to start up, and to supervise placing equipment or putting system into operation. 9. Submit a written report in accordance with Section 01400 that equipment or system has been properly installed and is functioning correctly. D. Performance Testing 1. Submit performance testing submittals in accordance with Section 01300 and Section 11100. 2. SUPPLIER'S Representative shall provide approved testing plans to June 2024 SECTION 01410-2 MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES CONTRACTOR prior to testing and shall be present during all performance testing. The representative will advise the CONTRACTOR during tests. 3. The SUPPLIER shall be responsible for all filter system performance testing submittals specified herein. E. Demonstration and Instructions 1. After all components have been started, tested, adjusted and verified by the SUPPLIER's representative, demonstrate operation and maintenance of Products to OWNER's personnel two (2)weeks prior to date of Substantial Completion. 2. Training program shall include, but is not limited to a: a) Detailed review of operation and maintenance manuals with OWNER's personnel, explaining all aspects of operation and maintenance. b) Demonstration of start-up, operation, control, adjustment, troubleshooting, servicing, maintenance, and shutdown of each item of equipment at scheduled times, at equipment location. 3. Supply operation and maintenance manuals in accordance with Section 01730. 4. Prepare and insert additional data in operations and maintenance manuals when needed or additional data becomes apparent during instruction. F. Trial Facility Support 1. Upon completion of start-up services, filter and associated facilities will be brought on-line for a period of sixty (60) days. During this trial period, the SUPPLIER shall be available by phone or email to advise OWNER and CONTRACTOR on final adjustments to operation of the system to the satisfaction of the ENGINEER and OWNER. SUPPLIER shall respond to advisement requests within three (3) business days. 2. Completion of the Trial Facility Support does not negate or fulfill the obligations of the SUPPLIER's warranty. PART 2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used June 2024 SECTION 01410-3 MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01410-4 MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES SECTION 01600 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT PART1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Products B. Transportation and handling C. Delivery Coordination D. Storage and protection 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01025 — Measurement and Payment B. Section 01300 — Submittals C. Section 01400 —Quality Control D. Section 11100 — Iron and Manganese Removal Filter Equipment 1.3 PRODUCTS A. Products: Means new material, machinery, components, equipment, fixtures, and systems forming the Equipment. Does not include machinery and equipment used for preparation, fabrication, conveying or erection of the Equipment. B. Provide interchangeable components of the same manufacturer for similar components. 1.4 TRANSPORTATION AND HANDLING A. Prepare and transport products to project site in accordance with manufacturer's standard protocol. Prepare and package all equipment to prevent damage during transit. B. Coordinate equipment delivery with the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR will provide dates for earliest possible and latest possible delivery. Ship the equipment to project site between these dates. Provide five (5) business days notice to CONTRACTOR of actual planned delivery date. Arrange shipment of all equipment to be delivered to project site Monday through Friday (except holidays) between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Mountain Time. June 2024 SECTION 01600-1 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT C. CONTRACTOR will unload equipment at the project site. Provide detailed off- loading and storage instructions to CONTRACTOR. Once the CONTRACTOR has accepted delivery of the equipment, the CONTRACTOR assumes responsibility for storage and protection of the equipment. D. The OWNER will not provide temporary off-site storage of the Equipment. 1.5 DELAYED DELIVERY A. The OWNER reserves the right to delay delivery of the Equipment up to three (3) months from the original delivery date in order to align with projected construction schedule. No cost increase to the OWNER for such a delivery delay is allowed. If the OWNER issues a delay notice to the SUPPLIER, SUPPLIER will provide revised delivery date windows to the OWNER and the CONTRACTOR. B. If a delay notification is issued to the SUPPLIER, the SUPPLIER may proceed, at its sole discretion, with equipment fabrication in accordance with its original schedule and store the equipment at a secure site. Provide location and storage methodology to OWNER for approval a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance of placing Equipment in storage. The SUPPLIER assumes all liability for the Equipment until delivery to the project site and acceptance of Equipment by the OWNER. No advance payments will be made to the SUPPLIER in this circumstance. PART 2 PRODUCTS Not used. PART 3 EXECUTION Not used. END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01600-2 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SECTION 01700 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT PART GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01010—Summary of Work. B. Section 01400—Quality Control. 1.2 CLOSEOUT PROCEDURES A. Submit written certification that Contract Documents have been reviewed, Work has been observed and documented, and that Work is complete in accordance with Contract Documents and ready for ENGINEER's review. B. Provide submittals to ENGINEER that are required by these specifications and applicable governing authorities. C. Submit final Application for Payment identifying total adjusted Contract Sum, previous payments, and sum remaining due. 1.3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA A. Submit data in accordance with Section 01300 and Section 01730. 1.4 WARRANTIES A. Submit warranties in accordance with Section 01300 and Section 11100. B. All guarantee work shall be done promptly by the SUPPLIER upon submittal of proof of defect. 1. Provide duplicate notarized copies. 2. Execute and assemble transferable warranty documents from Subcontractors, suppliers, and manufacturers. 3. Submit prior to final application for Payment. 4. For items of Work delayed beyond date of Substantial Completion, provide updated submittal within 10 days after acceptance, listing date of acceptance as start of warranty period. PART2 PRODUCTS Not Used PART 3 EXECUTION Not Used END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01700-1 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT This page intentionally blank. June 2024 SECTION 01700-2 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT SECTION 01730 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INFORMATION PART GENERAL 1.1 SCOPE A. Operation and maintenance (O&M) instructions shall be provided in accordance with this section and as required in the technical sections of the Contract Documents. O&M information shall be provided for each piece of equipment, equipment assembly or subassembly, and material provided or modified under this Contract. O&M information must be delivered when the piece of equipment is delivered to the project site. B. O&M instructions must be submitted and accepted before on-site training and any equipment testing may start. C. SUPPLIER must comply with and is responsible for compliance with O & M procedures until final completion is reached. 1.2 TYPES OF INFORMATION REQUIRED A. GENERAL: O&M information shall contain the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the manufacturer, the nearest representative of the manufacturer, and the nearest supplier of the manufacturer's equipment and parts. In addition, the following items of information shall be provided, as applicable. B. OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS: Specific instructions, procedures, and illustrations shall be provided for the following phases of operations: 1. Safety Precautions: List personnel hazards for equipment and list safety precautions for all operating conditions. 2. Operator Prestart: Provide requirements to set up and prepare each system for use. 3. Startup, Shutdown, and Post Shutdown Procedures: Provide a control sequence for each of these operations. 4. Normal Operations: Provide control diagrams with data to explain operation and control of systems and specific equipment. 5. Emergency Operations: Provide emergency procedures for equipment malfunctions to permit a short period of continued operation or to shut down the equipment to prevent further damage to systems and equipment. Include emergency shutdown instructions for fire, explosion, spills, or other foreseeable contingencies. Provide guidance on emergency operations of all systems including valve locations and portions of systems June 2024 SECTION 01730-1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE INFORMATION controlled. 6. Operator Service Requirements: Provide instructions for services to be performed by the operator such as lubrication, adjustments, and inspection. 7. Environmental Conditions: Provide a list of environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, and other relevant data)which are best suited for each product or piece of equipment and describe conditions under which equipment should not be allowed to run. C. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE: The following information shall be provided for preventive and scheduled maintenance to minimize corrective maintenance and repair: 1. Lubrication Data: Provide the following lubrication data: a) A table showing recommended lubricants for specific temperature ranges and applications; b) Charts with a schematic diagram of the equipment showing lubrication points, recommended types and grades of lubricants, and capacities; and, c) A lubrication schedule showing service interval frequency. 2. Preventive Maintenance Plan and Schedule: Provide manufacturer's schedule for routine preventive maintenance, inspections, tests, and adjustments required to ensure proper and economical operation and to minimize corrective maintenance and repair. Provide manufacturer's projection of preventative maintenance man-hours on a daily, weekly, monthly, and annual basis including craft requirements by type of craft, as applicable. 3. System Shut-Down Maintenance Plan and Schedule: Provide manufacturer's schedule for maintenance, inspections, tests, and adjustments required to protect system from degradation during long periods of non-use. D. CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE: Manufacturer's recommendations shall be provided on procedures and instructions for correcting problems and making repairs. 1. Troubleshooting Guides and Diagnostic Techniques: Provide step- by-step procedures to promptly isolate the cause of typical malfunctions. Identify tests or inspections and test equipment required to determine whether parts and equipment may be reused or require replacement. 2. Wiring Diagrams and Control Diagrams: Wiring diagrams and control diagrams shall be point-to-point drawings of wiring and control circuits including factory-field interfaces. Provide a complete June 2024 SECTION 01730-2 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE INFORMATION and accurate depiction of the actual job-specific wiring and control work. On diagrams, number electrical and electronic wiring and pneumatic control tubing and the terminals for each type with the actual installation numbering. 3. Maintenance and Repair Procedures: Provide instructions and list tools required to restore product or equipment to proper condition or operating standards. 4. Removal and Replacement Instructions: Provide step-by-step procedures and list required tools and supplies for removal, replacement, disassembly, and assembly of components, assemblies, subassemblies, accessories, and attachments. Provide tolerances, dimensions, settings, and adjustments required. Instructions shall include a combination of test and illustrations. 5. Spare Parts and Supply Lists: Provide lists of spare parts and supplies required for maintenance and repair to ensure continued service or operation without unreasonable delays. List spare parts and supplies that have a long lead time to obtain. 6. Corrective Maintenance Man-hours: Provide manufacturer's projection of corrective maintenance man-hours including craft requirements by type of craft. Corrective maintenance that requires participation of the equipment manufacturer shall be identified and tabulated separately. E. APPENDICES: The following information shall be provided; include information not specified in the preceding paragraphs but pertinent to the maintenance or operation of the product or equipment. 1. Parts Identification: Provide identification and coverage for all parts of each component, assembly, subassembly and accessory items subject to replacement. Include special hardware requirements, such as requirement to use high-strength bolts and nuts. Identify parts by make, model, serial number, and source of supply to allow reordering without further identification. Provide clear and legible illustrations, drawings, and exploded views to enable easy identification of the items. When illustrations omit the part numbers and description, both the illustrations and separate listing shall show the index, reference, or key number which will cross-reference the illustrated part to the listed part. Parts shown in the listings shall be grouped by components, assemblies, and subassemblies. Provide list of recommended spare parts to be maintained by OWNER. 2. Warranty Information: List and explain the various warranties and include the servicing and technical precautions prescribed by the manufacturers or contract documents to keep warranties in force. 3. Personnel Training Requirements: Provide information available from the manufacturers to use in training designated personnel to June 2024 SECTION 01730-3 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE INFORMATION operate and maintain the equipment and systems properly. 4. Testing Equipment and Special Tool Information: Provide information on test equipment required to perform specified tests and special tools needed for the operation, maintenance, and repair of components. 5. Safety Information: Provide applicable safety data sheets (SDS)for all materials supplied. PART 2 PRODUCTS— NOT USED PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURE A. Unless otherwise specified, O&M manuals, information, and data shall be transmitted in accordance with Section 01300 accompanied by Transmittal Form. The transmittal form shall be used as a checklist to ensure the manual is complete. Only complete sets of O&M instructions will be reviewed for acceptance. B. Submit the final O&M information in accordance with Section 01300. One (1) electronic copy (portable document format, i.e. PDF with bookmarks) and two (2) hard copies shall be provided. For ease of identification, each manufacturer's brochure and manual shall be appropriately labeled with the equipment name and equipment number as it appears in the project manual. Each piece of equipment given an asset tag number by the OWNER must be labeled with that asset tag number(s). The manuals shall be indexed and reference the discrete equipment number on all manuals, data sheets and drawings. The binders shall be provided with a table of contents and tab sheets to permit easy location of desired information. Binders shall be three-post type, with durable covers with metal hinges and locking slide bar assembly and shall be capable of extending to a maximum 6-inch thickness. C. If manufacturer's standard brochures and manuals are used to describe O&M procedures, such brochures and manuals shall be modified to reflect only the model or series of equipment used on this project. Extraneous material shall be crossed out neatly or otherwise annotated or eliminated. D. Submit Operation and Maintenance Manuals printed on 8'/2 in. x 11 in. size heavy quality paper (20 lb. or heavier). Reduce drawings or diagrams bound in manual to 8'/2 in. x 11 in. or 11 in. x 17 in. size. E. Following the acceptable installation and operation of an equipment item, the item's instructions and procedures shall be modified and supplemented by the SUPPLIER to reflect any field changes or information requiring field data. END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 01730-4 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE INFORMATION SECTION 11100 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM PART GENERAL 1.1 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 01300—Submittals. B. Section 01400—Quality Control. C. Section 01650—Starting of Systems. D. Section 01730—Operations and Maintenance Information. 1.2 PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE A. Review the filter influent raw water quantities and qualities and the specific requirements of this Work and guarantee in writing that the filter system will consistently produce a filter effluent which meets the design requirements included in this Section. B. The guarantee will be based on the OWNER properly operating and maintaining the filter system, as defined and detailed in the equipment O&M Manual provided by the SUPPLIER as part of this Work. 1.3 WARRANTY A. Warranty: Include two (2)year coverage on all supplied parts, workmanship, and materials. Warranty coverage will start on date of final acceptance. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. SUPPLIER will submit all items in the table below under the provisions of Section 01300. Table 1. Submittal Schedule Specification Deliverable Reference When to Submit Shop Drawings and Calculations 1.5.13 Initial Submittal Warranty 1.4.A Initial Submittal Product Data 1.5.13 Initial Submittal Delivery and Storage Requirements 1.5.C.12 Initial Submittal Operation and Maintenance Manuals 1.5.E.2 Prior to Shipment Pressure Vessel Coating Inspection & 2.11.0& D Prior to Shipment Testing Report Bill of Materials 1.5.C.11 With Shipment Functional Testing 1.5.D.4 Prior to Shipment Sample of Media and Sieve Analysis 1.5.D.3 Prior to Shipment Startup Procedures 1.2.13.3 2 Weeks Prior to Startup June 2024 SECTION 11100-1 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM Final PLC and HMI Applications and At Startup Passwords to OWNER B. Shop Drawing Submittals: 1. Submit detailed shop drawings. Include one digital AutoCAD file of the final submittal that includes line work of the overall system plan view and each profile view included in the shop drawings. 2. Include dimensions, component details, materials, piping connections, control interface detail, and power connection detail for proper installation and operation of drawings. 3. Provide drawings of the entire filter system layout that includes the following information: a) Proposed tank and ancillary equipment layout in plan and profile views. b) Overall system dimensions, including horizontal and vertical area. c) Dimensions between tank, equipment, piping, and other supplied objects. d) Description and location of all pipe connections, power connections, and control interface requirements. e) Description and illustration of proper access and clearance around all tanks and equipment for safe and easy operation and maintenance. Refer to clearance requirements in this Section. 4. Provide drawings with detailed schematic showing water flow path through the filter system for both the normal and backwash operational modes and any other modes proposed by SUPPLIER. Include in the schematic a detailed view of the water flow path through the filter vessel internal parts for each operational mode. 5. Provide hydraulic head loss calculations for the entire system and for each operational mode. Refer to Design Requirements in this Section for range of system pressure and flow rate. 6. Filter Tank: a) Drawings must include plan, profile, and section views that show internal and external dimensions and locate all access hatches, pipe connections, and all other tank appurtenances. b) Coating information, including a color chart. OWNER to choose exterior tank color. June 2024 SECTION 11100-2 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 7. Provide drawings that include the following power and control information and requirements: a) Detail of all mechanical and electrical process control systems being proposed with the filter system. b) Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID) and written control narratives for all system functions to be controlled, monitored, or alarmed. c) Schematic diagrams that include wiring diagrams of control panels, line numbers for associated device contacts shown in the schematic diagrams, and detail of the interface between field wiring and manufactured systems. d) All control panels and power supply panels included with the filter system must be detailed with panel layouts, dimensions, materials list, connection requirements, and access requirements. e) Input power requirements including voltage, frequency, phase requirement, total system maximum power load, and power quality limits. f) HMI screens. Sample screen shots for the system. The screen shots must show the screens that will be available from the HMI. g) A Ethernet/IP tag list with all tag information i.e., data type, read/write and description available for communication with the City's PLC and SCADA system shall be included. It is the Vendor's responsibility to notify the City and their integrator to any changes to the tag list after an approved submittal has been provided. h) IP addressing for Vendor provided equipment that is capable of network communications i.e. VFD's, PLC's, Instruments, PC's, HMI's, etc. shall be included for coordination with the City's IP address requirements for the project site. i) The existing Process Instrumentation and Control System (PICS)standard is Ethernet IP network protocol and is based on the City's standard Rockwell Automation platform. Network standardization is required to maximize operational efficiency and effectiveness and minimize network operational costs. j) All new equipment connected to PICS via Ethernet shall utilize native Ethernet IP protocol. The term "native" used in this context means that the protocol is integral to the equipment—a converter or gateway to convert from one protocol to another (e.g., Modbus Plus to Ethernet IP) is not required. The use of protocol converters and gateways for substitute equipment is not June 2024 SECTION 11100-3 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM acceptable. 8. Structural Information: a) Provide vertical and lateral (seismic) design loads for foundation design requirements. b) Provide all structural calculations for the filter system equipment, tank, and tank anchorage. The design must meet the requirements of 2018 IBC (latest version), ASCE 7-16, and ACI 318-14 (including Appendix D) and signed by a Professional Engineer(P.E.) licensed in the State of Idaho. C. Product Data Submittals: 1. Submit a complete list of major products proposed. 2. Submit product data for the filter system and all included equipment and materials. 3. Submit design data for the filter system and all included equipment and materials. 4. Submit detailed drawings for assembled filter system including: a) Front, left, right, rear, plan, and underside views. b) Isometric view. c) Label all valves according to the OWNER'S asset management system. 5. Submit design calculations, signed by an Idaho licensed P.E., and product data for tank anchor bolts including diameter, location, quantity, material, and type. Anchor bolt length will be determined by the OWNER'S ENGINEER. Anchor bolts and epoxy, if necessary, will be supplied by the CONTRACTOR. 6. Submit factory inspection logs and performance testing logs for all equipment and materials supplied. 7. Submit manufacturer's installation instructions. 8. Submit manufacturer's certificate of proper installation, stating that all equipment and materials provided by the SUPPLIER were properly installed by the CONTRACTOR. 9. Submit details of the SUPPLIER recommended filter media(s)that meet the performance requirements included in this Section. This includes media type, size, layer depth, overall media depth, and layering order. June 2024 SECTION 11100-4 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 10. Submit details on the estimated backwash water quantity, quality, and loading rate per filter cell backwash. This includes details on any air injection or scour system included with the backwash system. 11. Provide a detailed list of all hardware, fasteners, or materials required to interface with the mechanical, structural, electrical, control and monitoring instrumentation, and any other system supplied as part of the filter system. This includes all required interfaces or connections, and SUPPLIER recommended size or type of connection. 12. Submit a final bill of materials with delivery with manufacturer name and contact information, product name, product model number, and quantity for all final equipment and materials installed. 13. Submit equipment and material delivery and storage requirements for all equipment and materials. D. Quality Control Submittals: 1. Submit all quality control submittals under provisions of Section 01300 and Section 01400. 2. Submit a performance guarantee that the filter system components meet or exceed specified requirements, are properly sized and performance is guaranteed. 3. Submit a sample of the media material and the results of a sieve analysis on a representative sample prior to transport. 4. Functional Testing: Provide documentation that each filter system element requiring functional testing has been tested. Functional testing is not considered complete until the documentation is submitted and accepted by the ENGINEER. 5. Performance Testing Plan: Submit a performance testing plan that includes a narrative of the testing, data to be collected, analysis to be completed, and the detailed method of determining or defining filter system performance. Include the analysis of the quantity and quality of the raw water and filtered water from the performance test. 6. Performance Testing Report: Submit a report summarizing data collected and analysis done during the performance test and include a narrative of the results of the test. Include a determination and summary of the performance of the filter system throughout the test in the report. Performance testing will not be considered complete until the report is submitted to and approved by the ENGINEER. E. General Submittals 1. Submit startup procedure information to the OWNER and General June 2024 SECTION 11100-5 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM CONTRACTOR. The startup procedure information must include all steps and materials needed to startup and prepare the filter system for normal operations, including any washing and conditioning of the media. 2. Submit an Operation and Maintenance Manual for the filter system in accordance with Section 01300 and Section 01730. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Refer to Section 01400 Quality Control. PART2 PRODUCTS 2.1 GENERAL A. All products in contact with potable water must be NSF 61 and NSF 600 certified and meet current lead requirements. B. All interior tank piping and components must be 304 stainless steel; including, but not limited to the backwash trough, underdrain, airwash header nozzles, and fasteners. C. Meet all requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC), NEMA, NFPA, and all applicable local codes for electrical systems, assemblies, and distribution of. D. Comply with Idaho State Administrative Code 58.01.08, Idaho Rules for Public Drinking Water Systems for the filter system. 2.2 FILTER SYSTEM A. A pilot test was conducted on this well in 2021 and a Pilot Test Report is included in this Section as a Supplement. The Pilot Test Report is for reference only and not used as a substitution to these Specifications. B. Design the filter system based on the design requirements included in this Section. C. Scope of Supply: Supply all equipment and materials required for a properly functional water filtration system for the removal of manganese and iron. The filter system includes, at the minimum, the following components: 1. Filter Tanks. 2. Filter Media. 3. Valves. 4. Valve actuators. 5. Backwash and treated effluent flow meters. June 2024 SECTION 11100-6 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 6. Face piping and interconnecting pipes. 7. Instrumentation and control systems. 8. Power supply system. 9. Pressure gauges and transmitters. 10. Blower. 11. Any additional equipment, materials, appurtenances, and accessories required for a complete and operational system. 12. The following components are to be supplied by OWNER or by General CONTRACTOR under a separate contract: a) Well pump. b) Backwash wastewater system from the SUPPLIERS face piping to the wastewater collection system. c) Sodium hypochlorite storage. d) Chemical dosing pump(s). e) Chemical injection system (upstream of filter system). f) Chlorine analyzer(s). g) Power source. h) Building. i) Concrete equipment pads. D. Space Requirements 1. The complete filter system supplied as part of this Work and safe clearances is limited to the following space requirements: a) Maximum Filter System Horizontal Area (including piping and valves): 550 Square Feet 2. Minimum clearances: a) Tank manway hatches, control panel doors, power cabinet doors, or any other door/hatches must open completely and have the following clearance from door/hatch in any normal position: .............. 18 Inches b) Pipe appurtenances (valves, flow meters, etc.).............24 Inches June 2024 SECTION 11100-7 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM c) Power energized, floor-mounted equipment ..............42 Inches 2.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS A. Design requirements for the manganese and iron removal filter system must be based on the following parameters and requirements in Table 1: Table 1: Filtration System Design Criteria Parameter Criteria Units Notes Design Flow Rate 2,000 GPM Water Source Groundwater Operating Pressure Range 75- 100 PSI Target Effluent Pressure Range 77—80 PSI Post filter target Test Pressure 150 PSI Filter tank and associated appurtenances Number of Pressure Vessels 1 Each Horizontal, single vessel Number of Cells 3 Cell Influent Iron Concentration 0.13 m /L Effluent Iron concentration 0.10 m /L Influent Manganese Concentration 0.10 m /L Effluent Manganese Concentration 0.01 m /L Influent Ammonia Concentration 0.03 m /L Effluent Free Chlorine Concentration 1.0 m /L Influent Typical pH 7.5 Filtration Media N/A P rolusite Maximum Forward Loading Rate 8 GPM/SF Filtration Media Depth 36 Inches Supplier to provide final recommended depth. Gravel Media Depth 15 Inches Supplier to provide design including support media depth, depths and media type. Backwash Process Simultaneous Continuous filter Air/Water operation during backwash required Ground Elevation 2568 I Ft MSL B. The filtration system will be a single horizontal tank design with three (3) filter cells. The backwash system will backwash one (1)filter cell at a time and use treated source water provided by the other two cells. C. The filtration system will have the piping and controls to allow any number of cells to be in operation without exceeding the Maximum Forward Loading Rate specified in this Section and include the ability to reduce overall flow to the filtration system or allow a portion of total flow to bypass the filter system to prevent the exceedance. D. Well 24 operates with a variable frequency drive. The design of the filter system will operate at full flow conditions without exceeding the maximum June 2024 SECTION 11100-8 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM forward loading rates listed in Specification Section 11100, 2.3.A. Bypass piping and associated control valves will be provided by the installation contractor. The CONTRACTOR is the filter equipment installation contractor. The bid for the Installation CONTRACTOR will be done separately at the conclusion of the design of the system. 2.4 FILTER TANK A. The system will consist of horizontal filter only. The system will be designed for backwash of each filter cell once per day or less at design requirements listed in Part 2.9 of this Section. B. Design the filter tank to withstand an operating pressure of 100 psi and transient conditions up to 150 psi. Tank shall be pressure tested to 150 psi. C. Material: welded steel construction using SA-516 Grade 70 steel. D. Design and construction of the tank per ASME code requirements for pressure vessels, including ASME stamp. Pressure test to 150 psi per Part 2.3.B of this Section supersedes ASME code pertaining to test pressure. E. Minimum side wall height: ten (10)feet. F. Design each tank cell with an air release valve on top of the cell. See Hatch Air Release Schematic at the end of this section. G. Each tank is to include manway hatches, sufficient handholds, and hand holes for inspection and maintenance. Size manway hatches for safe human access to the inside of the vessel. Each filter cell must have at least one (1) manway hatch near the top of the vessel for inspection and media loading (24-inch minimum opening, hinged and pressure-tight), one (1) manway near the bottom of sidewall for underdrain inspection and media removal (bolted flange style), and one (1) hand hole at the of the top vessel. Manufacture hatches with hinges to facilitate opening/closing operation. H. Provide a '/2-inch NPT threaded piping connection at the top of each 24-inch manway hatch to allow for air release pipe installation in the field by the CONTRACTOR. See schematic detail at the end of this section. See Hatch Air Release Schematic at the end of this section. I. Include structural components required for proper installation and anchorage (e.g., lifting lugs, support legs, etc.). Support legs to be at a height such that bottom of leg is a minimum of 30" below bottom of tank. 2.5 FILTER TANK INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION A. Furnish filter with an inlet distributor/backwash collector designed for uniform distribution of inlet water over the entire filter bed and for the uniform collection of the backwash water during the backwash operation. The top of the backwash collector must be at least eighteen (18) inches above the surface of the filter media. June 2024 SECTION 11100-9 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM B. Furnish each filter cell with a backwash distribution system designed for uniform distribution of backwash water throughout the filter bed media during backwash operation. 2.6 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM A. Filter vessels shall be provided with a curved plate underdrain, as follows. Design the underdrain system to be accessible for inspection and maintenance. 1. Curved Plate Underdrains: Each filter bottom shall be equipped with a curved plate underdrain system consisting of a steel plate of proper radius extending over full length of the filter. The underdrain plate on which the support gravel rests shall be welded to the filter tank shell and head and shall be sufficiently strong to carry the filter media plus the maximum possible hydraulic pressure that can be applied. It shall be perforated with openings to receive non-clogging distributors. The underdrain shall be designed to reduce the water velocity, discharging the water horizontally without impeding its flow, thereby preventing channeling in the filter bed. A 14" x 18" manway shall be provided for access beneath the underdrain for each isolated cell for inspection and maintenance purposes. 2.7 AIR SCOUR GRIDS A. Furnish an in-bed air scour distributor system for each filter cell to be placed at the interface between the supporting gravel bed and the filter media. The air wash grids shall be properly sized to provide even distribution of air throughout the entire filter bed when air is applied at a rate of 3 cfm/sf of bed area. Installation by CONTRACTOR. B. Each in-bed air scour grid system shall consist of rigid schedule 304 SST pipe headers and ABS underdrain nozzles. Laterals shall be cut to proper length. The pipe headers shall be rigidly supported at points not exceeding 5 ft centers. 2.8 FILTRATION MEDIA A. Provide pyrolusite treatment media with a thirty-six (36) inch depth. The media will be installed by the General CONTRACTOR based on the SUPPLIER'S recommended practices. The pyrolusite media must be certified to NSF/ANSI Standard 61. B. Provide recommended gravel media(s) separating the treatment media from the underdrain system. Gravel media must be "water treatment"quality, washed and screened, and shipped in clearly marked one hundred (100#) pound bags. The gravel must meet the requirements of the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Specification number B-100. June 2024 SECTION 11100-10 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 2.9 BACKWASH A. Backwash water will be disposed of in the OWNER'S sanitary sewer collection system. Backwash flow rate to sanitary sewer collection system cannot exceed 430 gpm. B. Include a combined water and air scour backwash option system. Simultaneous air-water backwashing must provide air up to the rate of 3 cfm/sq. ft. at 5 psi and water rate of 5 gpm/sf for a minimum of 5 minutes based on actual operating conditions. C. Design the backwash system with treated source water only. Design filter such that treated water flow rate of all filter cells minus one is equivalent to or greater than backwash flow rate required for one filter cell. D. Under normal operation parameters, filter must be capable of providing a minimum treated water flow to distribution system of 670 gpm during backwash operations. E. Provide backwash flow controls for regulating the flow rate so that the maximum backwash loading rate is not exceeded. Refer to Performance Requirements included in this Section. 2.10 FILTER EXTERIOR VALVING A. All valves must be pressure rated consistently with the pressure rating of the filter tanks. B. Provide all flanged valves with Type 316 stainless steel bolts and nuts and EPDM gaskets. C. Maximum height of valves above finish floor is 60"with the exception of air release valves for each cell. D. Electrically Actuated Valves: 1. Bray Series 30/31 with Series 70 actuators. 2. Service: a) Six (6)— raw water valves (open/close) b) Six (6)— backwash waste valves (open/close) c) Six (6)—filtered water valves (open/close with limit stop) d) Six (6)— backwash supply valves e) Two (2)— high-rate backwash flow control valves (modulating) f) Two (2)— low-rate backwash supply valves (open/close with limit stop) g) Six (6)— air scour valves (open/close) h) Two (2)—filter-to-waste valves (open/close with limit stop) June 2024 SECTION 11100-11 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM E. All manual isolation valves, 2-inch and smaller: ball valve type. F. Automatic Air Release Valves 1. Automatic air release system, consisting of Val-Matic or equal air/vacuum combination release valve for each cell, brass ball valves, and stainless steel piping shipped in pieces for field assembly by the CONTRACTOR. Sizing as determined by SUPPLIER's design. 2.11 FILTER SYSTEM PIPING A. Water Piping 1. Exterior piping. AWWA C115 cement mortar lined ductile iron pipe with ductile iron flanges with AWWA C110 flange connections. 2. No direct taps allowed. Use saddle taps or Onyx PSR isolator rings with NSF-61 EPDM rubber sleeve. 3. All interior piping per Part 2.1.13 this section to be sandblasted per SSPC SP-10 and shop applied NSF/ANSI Standard 61 epoxy. 4. All piping exterior surfaces are to be sandblasted per SSPC SP-6 and shop applied primer. 5. Finish coating of the piping exterior is to be field applied by the CONTRACTOR in accordance with SUPPLIER recommendation and OWNER Specification. 6. Furnish all filter system face and interconnecting pipe with Type 316 stainless steel bolts and nuts and ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber(EPDM) gaskets. 2.12 COATING SYSTEMS A. Comply with this Section and AWWA standards, whichever is more stringent, for all coated equipment. B. SUPPLIER to provide finish coating of the tank exterior prior to delivery to OWNER. C. Filter Tank Internal 1. Thoroughly clean tank interior removing all dirt, grease, etc. prior to sand blasting and coating. 2. Surface preparation: abrasive blast. Conform to the requirements of SSPC-SP10 "Near White Blast Cleaning" with a minimum angular anchor profile of 1.5 mils. Paint all blasted surfaces within 8 hours of blasting. Remove all weld splatter by grinding or chipping prior to sandblasting. June 2024 SECTION 11100-12 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 3. Coat tank interiors in accordance with AWWA D 102-21. Minimum system consists of: a) Prime coat: 6.0—8.0 dry film thickness. b) Stripe coat: on all welds and seams, 2.0—4.0 mils dry film thickness. c) Finish coat: 6.0—8.0 mils dry film thickness. 4. Coating material: Tnemec Series 21 Epoxoline or equal. 5. Products used must be NSF 61 and NSF 600 certified for potable water application. 6. Color: see Part 1.4.B.6(b) in Section 11100. Prime coat color to be different than other coats in order for OWNER to differentiate in photographs provided. 7. Perform holiday/continuity testing in accordance with ASTM D 5162. Correct all defects identified from testing and re-test until passing results are obtained. 8. Provide written documentation of results to OWNER prior to shipment. Documentation to include: a) Internal coating preparation and coating application including prime, intermediate, stripe and final coats and final mil thickness for each. b) Provide surface preparation, deburring inspection and cure times documentation. c) Photos of surface preparation and each coating stage. D. Filter Tank Exterior 1. Surface preparation: abrasive blast. Conform to the requirements of SSPC-SP6 "Commercial Blast Cleaning." Coat all blasted surfaces within 8 hours of blasting. Remove all weld splatter by grinding or chipping prior to sandblasting. 2. Prime coat: one (1) prime coat (6 - 8 mils DFT) of Tnemec Series 21 Epoxoline. 3. Stripe coat: on all welds and seams, 2.0—4.0 mils dry film thickness. 4. Final coat: 6—8 mils DFT Tnemec Series 21 Epoxoline. 5. Products used must be NSF 61 certified for potable water application. 6. Perform holiday/continuity testing in accordance with ASTM D 5162 and provide written documentation of results prior to shipment. June 2024 SECTION 11100-13 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM E. Pressure Vessel Coatings Application Inspection and Report 1. All surface preparation and coating operations shall be monitored 100% by a third-party coating inspection firm that is certified as an SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings QP5 Coating inspection firm (SSPC-QP5 Certified Firm). a) The coatings inspection firm shall provide a full report on internal coating preparation and application inspection for record in submittal to OWNER prior to shipment of the pressure vessel. b) At a minimum, the inspection report shall include photos, measurements, findings, recommendations, and final approvals of the following painting steps: 1) Blasting and deburring inspection 2) Prime Coat 3) Stripe Coat 4) Intermediate Coat 5) Final Coat 6) Holiday test results and touch up required. Holiday/continuity testing shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM D5162. Correct any defects found during testing and re-test until passing results are obtained. c) The cost of third-party coatings inspection and testing shall be paid by the SUPPLIER. F. Piping 1. Ductile iron mechanical face piping and fittings furnished by the SUPPLIER shall be supplied with one exterior coat of shop-applied epoxy or zinc-based primer. 2. The topcoat applied to ductile iron mechanical face piping and fittings shall be field applied by the CONTRACTOR in accordance with SUPPLIER recommendation and OWNER Specification. 3. Valves shall be furnished with a fusion-bonded epoxy exterior coating system or equivalent shop-applied by the valve manufacturer. 2.13 SYSTEM ACCESSORIES A. FILTER PRESSURE EQUIPMENT June 2024 SECTION 11100-14 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 1. Furnish liquid filled pressure gauges for each filter cell inlet and outlet with 4.5" diameter dials, bronze bourdon tubes, designed to measure and display pressures 0 to 160 psig. 2. Furnish each pressure gauge with brass fittings and manual isolating valves. 3. Pressure transducers must be provided on both influent and effluent sides of the overall filter system: Endress Hauser Ceraphant PTC31B- 1-600 psi. B. SAMPLING PORTS 1. Provide sampling ports upstream and downstream of the overall filter system and on the outlet of each filter cell. Sampling ports shall include Apollo 70LF-100 series full port ball valve, or approved equal, so that a sample line may be routed to an easy to reach location. Sampling taps to be provided by the SUPPLIER and installed in the field by the CONTRACTOR. C. FLOW MEASURING DEVICE 1. Flow meters: McCrometer Ultra Mag electromagnetic flow meter with AMI output. 2. Flow meter service: a) Total influent flow. b) Filter effluent flow, each cell (three required). c) Total effluent flow. d) Backwash flow. D. AIR SCOUR BLOWER 1. Blower accessories shall consist of intake air filter, intake silencer, discharge silencer, pressure relief valve, pressure relief valve silencer, check valve, intake and outlet flexible connections, and pressure gauge. 2. Air scour piping exterior to the filter shall be schedule 10 stainless steel. Air scour piping shall be looped above the filter. E. ORIFICE PLATES 1. Orifice plates shall be provided as necessary to drop pressure and prevent cavitation during backwash and filter-to-waste steps. 2. Supplier shall provide orifice plate sizing. June 2024 SECTION 11100-15 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 2.14 EXTRA MATERIALS/ SPARE PARTS A. SUPPLIER to deliver extra materials to OWNER. Furnish extra materials matching products installed as described below. Package them with protective covering for storage and label clearly describing contents. 1. 6 manway gaskets. 2. 1 valve of each size & type. 2.15 CONTROL SYSTEMS A. General Requirements: 1. The filter control system shall be designed to interface with the OWNER's SCADA system and shall provide monitoring and control of the filter system on site or remotely through an Ethernet/IP connection. 2. Programming of the filtration control system, including the filtration system PLC, integration with all treatment-related instrumentation, and integration with automated equipment furnished as part of the SUPPLIER's control system, shall be the responsibility of the SUPPLIER. 3. Programming of Well 24 control system, including the well facility PLC, well pump variable frequency drive, flow and pressure instrumentation not provided by the SUPPLIER, and other equipment or instrumentation not furnished by the SUPPLIER as part of the SUPPLIER's control system, shall be the responsibility of the OWNER and/or CONTRACTOR. 4. The SUPPLIER shall provide the necessary 1/0 ports for communication between the filtration system PLC and the well facility PLC as defined in this Specification. 5. The OWNER will provide Valve & Instrumentation Tags prior to start of submittals. 6. SUPPLIER will provide all equipment, hardware, and software necessary to fulfill all the functional requirements of a properly functional water filtration system for the removal of manganese and iron. B. Backwash Initiation and Control Requirements: The filter system shall allow for simultaneous air-water backwash and water-only backwash media rinse as described below. 1. Simultaneous air-water backwash: The simultaneous air-water backwash process shall be the primary method used to clean the filter media and shall be automatically initiated through one of the following modes: June 2024 SECTION 11100-16 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM a) Mode 1: Backwash is triggered using a weekly time-based schedule. The schedule shall provide two (2) adjustable time setpoints for each day of the week that will initiate a backwash cycle regardless of differential pressure. The control system shall allow each time setpoint to be enabled or disabled separately. 1) If both setpoints for a day are disabled, backwash for that day shall be initiated as described below in Mode 2. 2) If the differential pressure setpoints described in Mode 2 are reached before the next scheduled backwash, backwash shall be initiated based on the control logic for Mode 2 described below. b) Mode 2: Backwash is triggered by exceedance of a differential pressure setpoint across the filtration system. The system shall provide the following three OWNER-adjustable differential pressure setpoints: 1) Normal Differential Pressure: If the filter differential pressure exceeds the normal differential pressure setpoint, a backwash cycle shall occur provided the setpoint is exceeded within an OWNER-adjustable daily time window. If the normal differential pressure setpoint is exceeded outside the daily time window, backwash will be delayed and normal operation will continue until within the daily time window. 2) High Differential Pressure: If the high differential pressure setpoint is exceeded, all backwash frequency-limiting settings shall be overridden and a backwash shall be initiated regardless of the day of the week or time of day. If a backwash is triggered under the high differential pressure setpoint, a high-pressure alarm shall be sent to the OWNER's SCADA system. 3) High Alarm/Shutdown Differential Pressure: If the filter differential pressure exceeds the high alarm/shutdown differential pressure setpoint, the filter control system shall send a signal to the OWNER's control system to shut down the Well 24 pump and motor and initiate an overpressure shutdown alarm in the OWNER's SCADA system. 4) Each differential pressure setpoint shall operate in conjunction with an adjustable timer interlock setpoint to prevent short-term pressure spikes or fluctuations from triggering a backwash cycle. 2. A filter to waste cycle shall be provided as the last step in backwash operation in both operational modes. The time duration June 2024 SECTION 11100-17 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM of the filter to waste cycle shall be adjustable through the filtration system HMI. 3. Water-only backwash media rinse: The filter system shall be furnished with the ability to allow a water-only media rinse to be manually initiated by the treatment system operator. C. Air Piping Condensate Purge Control Valve Requirements: 1. The filtration control system shall operate an air condensate purge control valve through an electric actuator (Bray Series 70 or equal). 2. The control valve and actuator shall be furnished by SUPPLIER and installed by CONTRACTOR at a low point in the air supply piping between the blower and the filtration pressure vessel. 3. The filtration control system shall be programmed to open the control valve prior to blower startup when a backwash cycle is initiated to allow condensate to drain from the blower discharge piping for a user-adjustable time period. After the timer has expired, the control system shall close the control valve and allow the blower to start. 4. The position of the control valve shall be indicated on the filtration control system HMI. D. Well 24 Control Requirements: 1. The control system shall allow communication via an Ethernet/IP connection with the OWNER'S control network to provide the following functions: a. The filtration system HMI shall allow adjustment of the filtration rate through communication with the OWNER'S control network. Control of the Well 24 pumping rate to the filtration system shall be accomplished by the OWNER'S control network. b. The filtration control system shall communicate the beginning and end of a filter cell backwash cycle with the OWNER'S control network to allow the Well 24 pumping rate to be reduced to maintain a constant hydraulic loading rate on the filter cells that are not in backwash mode. E. Minimum Filtration System Remote Control Requirements: 1. The control system shall allow remote control of the following filtration system functions through an Ethernet/IP connection with the OWNER'S control network: June 2024 SECTION 11100-18 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM a. Initiate filter system backwash event. b. Terminate filter system backwash event. c. Start and stop filter system. d. Adjust the pumping rate through the filter system. e. Change backwash cycle setpoints for differential pressure and time schedule. F. Chlorination System Control Requirements: 1. The control system shall allow remote control (start/stop/auto/hand) of the chlorine metering pump to be provided by the CONTRACTOR. The metering pump shall operate whenever the Motor Drive is on, the motor reports a running status, and flow is physically being measured through the Well Production Meter when in automatic mode. 2. The metering pump shall be controlled using a 4 — 20 mA analog pacing signal from the raw water flow meter to provide flow- proportional chemical dosing. Analog signal scaling shall be performed using the metering pump local controls. G. Alarms: 1. Alarms shall be logged and displayed on local control panel HMI and relayed to the OWNER'S SCADA system, including the time and date stamp reflecting the occurrence and nature of the alarm. H. Control System Components: 1. Power supply, terminal blocks and relays to be Allen-Bradley to conform to City's standard and spare parts inventory. 2. The control panel shall include a Toshiba UPS with Kendall Howard mount and contact card for the UPS. Size PLC control panel to allow UPS to be door mounted. Vendor panel to come with UPS bypass. C&C Power Model 93802, sized as appropriate, is preferred. 3. The instrumentation and control system shall be the SUPPLIER'S standard system, except as modified and specified herein. 4. PLC enclosure: NEMA 12 powder coated carbon steel. 5. PLC shall be Allen-Bradly CompactLogix platform: a. Controller— 5069-L306ER b. Digital Inputs— 5069-IB16 c. Digital Outputs —5069-OB16 d. Analog Inputs — 5069-IY4 e. Analog Outputs - 5069-OF4 f. HMI — PanelView Plus 1250 June 2024 SECTION 11100-19 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM 6. PLC programming software shall be AB Studio 5000 V32. 7. PLC panel wiring requirements: a. Provide one fused terminal block with blown fuse LED for each group of 8 digital inputs. b. Provide one fused terminal block and one ground terminal block for each analog input signal. c. Provide 20% spare area for future terminal blocks and 1/0 cards. 8. Provide 100% spare fuses for PLC panel. I. Control System HMI Screen Contents and System Monitoring Requirements: 1. A separate NEMA 12 power coated carbon steel enclosure to house the HMI shall be provided with means to connect back to the PLC control panel enclosure. 2. The screens and menus displayed in the control system HMI shall match the layout and provide the information shown in the following table. OWNER will coordinate with SUPPLIER to establish the items to be included in the control system HMI during the design and procurement process. The information provided below is intended to establish a minimum standard for the level of control and monitoring to be provided by SUPPLIER'S HMI. Additional information, menus, setpoints, and other necessary monitoring and control information may be included if provided by SUPPLIER as part of SUPPLIER'S standard control system, or if required for SUPPLIER to provide a complete and functional filtration system. June 2024 SECTION 11100-20 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM Meridian Well 24 HMI Screen Information Summary Table Screen Name Screen No. Screen Description Screen Components System Monitor System Setup Menu Backwash Monitor Filter Cell Manual Control Well Facility Equipment Control Provides menu access to filter Main Menu 1 monitoring and operating Flow Totalizer Summary menus Backwash Schedule Setpoints Backwash Headloss Setpoints Backwash Time Window Setpoints Backwash Time Schedule Alarm History and Event Log Display Well Pump Status (Remote/On/Off/Auto) Display Airwash Blower Status (Remote/On/Off/Auto) Display Chlorine Metering Pump Status (Remote/On/Off/Auto) Display Raw Water Free/Total Chlorine (ppm) System 2 Provides monitoring and Display Finished Water Free/Total Chlorine Monitor status of facility equipment (ppm) Display Raw Water Flow Rate(gpm) Display Individual Cell Flow Rates(gpm) Display Finished Water Flow Rate(gpm) Display Backwash Flow Rate(gpm) Display Bypass Flow Rate(gpm) Display Differential Pressure(psi) June 2024 SECTION 11100-21 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM Display Electronic Control Valve Status (Open/Closed/Position/Local/Remote) Well Pump Status(Remote/On/Off/Auto) Airwash Blower Status (Remote/On/Off/Auto) Display Backwash Flow Rate(gpm) Backwash 3 Provides monitoring and Display Backwash in Progress(Yes/No) Monitor status of backwash process Display Current Backwash Cycle Step Display Backwash Step/Cycle Timer (minutes remaining) Backwash Type Initiation (Headloss/Schedule/Both) Well Pump Status(Remote/On/Off/Auto) Airwash Blower Status (Remote/On/Off/Auto) Filter Cell Operating Mode(Manual/Auto) Display Raw Water Flow Rate(gpm) Filter Cell Provide manual control of Manual 4-6 actuated valves and system Display Individual Cell Flow Rates(gpm) Control status. Provide one screen for each filter cell. Display Finished Water Flow Rate(gpm) Display Backwash Flow Rate(gpm) Display Bypass Flow Rate(gpm) Electronic Valve Actuator Control (Status/Open/Close/Local/Remote) Backwash Initiation (Start/Stop) Blower Control (Start/Stop/Auto) Well Facility Provide control and Well Pump Control Equipment 7 monitoring of well facility (Call/Lockout/Auto/Remote) Control equipment not furnished by SUPPLIER Chlorine Metering Pump(Start/Stop/Auto) Blower Run Fault Setpoint(secs) June 2024 SECTION 11100-22 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM Well Pump Run Fault Setpoint(secs) Display Current Day(kgal) Display flow meter totalizer Display Previous Week(each day,total for Flow Totalizer values for raw water(total), week, kgal) 8 raw water(per cell), Summary Display Previous Month(kgal) backwash,finished water, and bypass flow Display Total to Date(kgal) Totalizer Reset(yes/no) Cell Isolation Setpoint(min) Cell Draindown Setpoint(min) Air/Water Backwash Setpoint(min) Backwash Display setpoints for each Purge Cell Setpoint(min) Schedule 9 step of the backwash cycle Setpoints and the elapsed time for each Refill Cell Setpoint(min) step during a backwash cycle Repressurize Cell Setpoint(min) Filter to Waste Setpoint(min) Delay between Cell Backwashes Setpoint (min) Normal Differential Pressure Setpoint(psid) High Differential Pressure Setpoint(psid) High Alarm/Shutdown Differential Pressure Backwash Display differential pressure Setpoint(psid) Headloss 10 setpoints and time interlock Timer Interlock(min,each differential Setpoints setpoints for backwash cycle pressure setpoint) Display Current Timer Interlock Value(min, each differential pressure setpoint,when timer active) Display Current Differential Pressure(psid) Backwash Allows adjustment of time Backwash Allowed (Yes/No,each hour,24- Window 11 window when backwash on hour clock) normal differential pressure Setpoints Current Time Display 24-hour clock Setpoint is permitted p Y( ) 12 Time Setpoint(2 setpoints/day, HR:MM, 24-hour clock) June 2024 SECTION 11100-23 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM Backwash Allows adjustment of weekly Schedule schedule for backwashing at Time Setpoint Active(enable/disable) Setpoints set times. Display alarm date/time, acknowledgement time,and alarm message Display alarm history and Alarm History 13 allow acknowledgement of Display current date/time alarms Acknowledge single alarm (yes/no) Acknowledge all alarms(yes/no) Display record of events Display event date/time and message Event Log 14 logged automatically. Coordinate event logging Display current date/time requirements with OWNER. Display SCADA communications status (connected/not connected) Toggle SCADA control (on/off) Navigate to analog output scaling Navigation to instrument and adjustment menus for flow meters, System Setup 15 alarm differential pressure transmitter, and Menu calibration/configuration chlorine analyzers screens Navigate to limit switch fault setpoint configuration menu Navigate to alarm configuration menu Navigate to time/date set menu 4 mA Process Variable Setpoints(flow meters,free/total chlorine analyzers, differential pressure transmitter) Allow adjustment of the value Analog Output of the process variable for 4 20 mA Process Variable Setpoints(flow 16 meters,free/total chlorine analyzers, Scaling mA and 20 mA analog differential pressure transmitter) instrument outputs Display current process variable value(flow meters,free/total chlorine analyzers, differential pressure transmitter) Allow adjustment of delay Limit Switch time setpoints for electronic Limit switch time delay setpoints(each Fault Setpoints 17 actuated valve fault electronically actuated valve,seconds) indication/alarming June 2024 SECTION 11100-24 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM Alarm Allows enabling/disabling system alarms. Coordinate list Configuration 18 Alarm Type(enable/disable) Menu of required alarms with OWNER. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 SHIPMENT A. Coordinate delivery of all equipment and materials with the CONTRACTOR and deliver all equipment and materials specified in this and other sections to the project site. See Section 01010 for project site location. B. Package and ship all equipment and materials in a manner that protects them from damage during transport. C. Prior to transfer to the OWNER and CONTRACTOR, the SUPPLIER's representative, OWNER, and CONTRACTOR must be present at time of delivery to inspect the equipment or materials. Any damage, defects, or non-compliance with approved submittals or these Specifications will be documented. D. Equipment or materials not accepted by the OWNER at time of delivery, either due to damage or non-compliance, will be replaced by the SUPPLIER in a timely manner and at the SUPPLIER's expense. E. Coordinate unloading with the CONTRACTOR and OWNER. 3.2 INSTALLATION A. Perform installation inspection in accordance with this Section and Section 01400. 3.3 START-UP A. Perform system start-up in accordance with this Section, Section 01400, and the City's standard Commissioning Checklist for Treatment Facilities. 3.4 SUPPLEMENTS A. The following supplements, attached herein, are considered part of this Section: 1. Pilot Study Report for City of Meridian, ID Wells 26 &24 dated July 13, 2021. 2. City of Meridian Public Works Water Facilities Design checklist. END OF SECTION June 2024 SECTION 11100-25 IRON AND MANGANESE REMOVAL FILTER SYSTEM AIR RELEASE/ VACUUM VALVE BALL VALVE p BIDE OUTLET TEE BUSHING ACCESS MANWAY FILTER TANK (ELEVATION VIEW) s h 1 - ALL PIPING AND VALVES SHOWN ON SCHEMATIC TO BE NPT THREADED. - VALVES SIZED BY SUPPLIER. 3. AIR PIPING BETWEEN HATCH ANO AIR RELEASE/VACUUM VALVE IN FIELD BY CONTRACTOR. MERIDIAN WELL 31 TREATMENT HATCH AIR RELEASE-SCHEMATIC March 2024 APPENDIX A-WELL 24 PILOT TEST REPORT This report is included as an appendix for the convenience of the SUPPLIER in preparing a proposal and is not part of the contract documents. Actual conditions at Well 24 may differ from those contained in this report. This page intentionally blank. June 2024 LOPREST A 01VISION OF WRT Pilot Study Report on WRT/Loprest Div. Filtration System for Iron & Manganese Removal Y r-', conducted by Loprest, a division of WRT Westminster, Colorado for the City of Meridian, ID Wells No. 26 & 24 PWS ID # 4010097 Job # L33668 Meridian, ID July 13, 2021 Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116t'Avenue, Suite 400,Westminster, Colorado 80234 303-424-5355 LLIPREST Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS.....................................................3 2.0 THE WRT/LOPREST FILTRATION SYSTEM AND STUDY OVERVIEW4 2.1 Iron and Manganese Removal......................................................................................5 3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION.................................................................5 3.1 Pilot Study Equipment and Process Flow Diagram...................................................8 3.2 WRT/Loprest Pilot Study Equipment Photos.............................................................9 4.0 RAW WATER ANALYTICAL DATA............................................................. 10 4.1 Statement of Purpose.................................................................................................. 10 5.0 PILOT TEST PROTOCOL................................................................................ 10 5.1 Operating Procedures and Performance Testing..................................................... 10 5.1.1 Preparation of Chemical Solutions.......................................................... 10 5.1.2 Operating Procedure................................................................................ 11 5.1.3 Sampling Protocol..................................................................................... 12 5.1.4 Sample Tests.............................................................................................. 12 5.1.5 Onsite Test Equipment, Procedures, and Methods............................... 12 6.0 TREATMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION......................................... 13 6.1 Filter Head Loss........................................................................................................... 13 6.2 Breakpoint Chlorination............................................................................................. 14 6.3 Iron and Manganese Treatment................................................................................. 16 7.0 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION NOTES.....................................................23 7.1 Contaminant removal................................................................................................23 7.2 Pressure loss................................................................................................................. 23 7.3 Recommendations........................................................................................................23 APPENDIXA..................................................................................................................25 APPENDIXB.................................................................................................................. 66 Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116t'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 ICiPREST Page 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The City of Meridian is plans to add treatment for iron and manganese for well sites 26 and 24. Iron and manganese are the primary constituents of concern for these two sites, having been sampled above or near their secondary maximum contaminant levels. The City of Meridian asked WRT/Loprest Division to complete pilot studies at each site for water sources to remove these constituents in preparation for full-scale treatment. The pilot study was conducted to evaluate two filtration media types designed for iron and manganese removal. Well 26 is permitted to flow at 2,500 gpm, meanwhile Well 24 can flow at 1,800 gpm. Manganese levels are suspected to exceed the Idaho State secondary MCL value for drinking water of 0.05 mg/L in both raw waters. And dissolved iron is also present in both wells, but below its corresponding secondary MCL. In testing, measured iron levels in Well 24 were much less than originally reported. Concentrations of ammonia are low at both sites, though samples were analyzed for ammonia nitrogen to assess its effect on chlorination and residuals of free chlorine. Based off previous pilots conducted at Meridian well sites, WRT/Loprest Division selected two water treatment media systems for testing. Both medias are notable for their demonstrated effectiveness at removing iron and manganese. In line with these expectations, both media systems treated iron and manganese below secondary MCL values for both well sites. The project specifications require finished water from both wells be treated in accordance with USEPA and State of Idaho primary and secondary MCL standards for drinking water. State of Idaho secondary MCL values for iron and manganese are 0.3 mg/L total iron and 0.05 mg/L total manganese. The pilot test contaminant removal goals are treated water concentrations less than Idaho state drinking water standards while providing an ample chlorine residual post-treatment. Three (3) filter runs were conducted using both media types at each site to assess their contaminant removal effectiveness and their effects on ammonia reduction. Each of the filter runs had a service period of 8 hours followed by a backwash using treated water. Recommended chlorine doses for full oxidation and removal of iron and manganese are applied during the first filter run as determined via breakpoint chlorination tests conducted at each well. The second and third filter runs at each site help to demonstrate repeatable treatment results and further assess ammonia oxidation capability of both medias. Metal contaminant iron and manganese removal is the primary objective of the pilot studies. The filter columns are operated within the maximum industry standard hydraulic loading rate for iron and manganese removal and as recommended by the filter media manufacturers. Sodium hypochlorite(NaOCI)feeding rates are adjusted to maintain free chlorine residuals of at least 1 mg/L in the finished treated water. The first media type, media F1, is a mixed bed of Inversand's GreensandPluse granular media and anthracite coal with a hypochlorite reagent feed to generate available free chlorine oxidant as pretreatment. Pressure losses in F 1 systems gradually increased during Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 11611 Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 4 Well 26 filter runs and remained steady for Well 24 filter runs, never dropping more than 3.8 psi across all runs. F1 filter runs removed iron to nondetectable levels and manganese to 0.033 mg/L using field analytical methods. These systems were also able to reduce most if not all the ammonia present while conserving 85% of influent free chlorine, on average. The second media system tested,media F2,tradename Mang-Ox®,is a granular manganese oxide media. This media received the same hypochlorite pretreatment as the F 1 systems. On average, F2 systems usually had lower pressure losses than their F1 counterparts, and with comparable removal performances for all contaminants across all filter runs. The most notable difference between filter media being that F2 systems consumed more free chlorine presumably due to superior catalytic ammonia oxidation capability. Most field samples for ammonia nitrogen in raw water were measured below 0.1 mg/L, and reached maximums of 0.24 mg/L. Removal performance for ammonia was typically greater than 90%, save for a measured 8 5% ammonia removal for F1 systems at Well 26. Higher ammonia in Well 26 raw water corresponded to a higher breakpoint for sodium hypochlorite to generate a free chlorine residual above 1 mg/L wherein 2.6 mg/L is required compared to 1.9 mg/L in Well 24 raw water. Iron and manganese are treatable using either filter media, with similar performance between medias at both well sites. Backwashes at either site will likely be initiated on a basis of pressure loss at Well 26 and contaminant breakthrough for Well 24. With the test conditions encountered at these two (2)well water sources, an estimated theoretical solids loading capacity is achieved in 72 hrs. of filter service time for Well 26 water and more than approximately 7 days in Well 24 raw water before a filter cleaning backwash cycle is required. A maximum recommended service period before a backwash cleaning cycle is is 7 days for a full-scale system designed using either media type. Increasing hypochlorite dosing by roughly 20% above breakpoint was shown to reduce dissolved ammonia and effectively managing residual free chlorine in the filter effluent on both filter systems. 2.0 THE WRT/LOPREST FILTRATION SYSTEM AND STUDY OVERVIEW The WRT/Loprest system removes iron and manganese contaminants from drinking water in a downflow filtration media process using chemical oxidation and co-precipitation. Solid phase metal oxide contaminants are physically separated from the water stream, collected within a packed media bed and safely removed during a backwash operation. The backwash wastewater from the filter is directed to an on-site collection tank for disposal. The process has been designed for simplicity of operation minimal maintenance and reliable operation. The filtration system is similarly designed for versatility to adapt to the requirements of each well-specific treatment facility. Several media types have demonstrated effective catalytic oxidation properties and can be used to facilitate the oxidation process. Depending upon the specific water conditions and Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 11611 Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 5 corresponding water quality, oxidative media types will perform differently. This pilot study is conducted using two selected media types for side-by-side comparative assessment of the iron and manganese removal performance as well as measured ammonia immediately following media contact for treating these raw ground water sources. A manganese dioxide media trade named Mang-Ox® and a proprietary product from Inversand Co. trademarked GreensandPlus® are tested in two 30-inch tall parallel filter columns. 2.1 Iron and Manganese Removal The most common method of removing iron and manganese from water involves the oxidation of soluble iron (Fe+2, or ferrous ion) and manganese (Mn+2, or manganous ion) to insoluble forms (Fe+3, ferric ion, and Mn+4,tetravalent manganese ion), and subsequent removal of the precipitates formed using filtration. Mang-Ox®is an 80%pure manganese dioxide ore, mined and screened for potable water use. In waters with a positive oxidation/reduction potential(ORP), it can work without the use of an oxidant. Other manganese dioxide ore materials mixed with a variety of sand materials are available under various trade names. GreensandPlus® is a manganese dioxide coated media with a silica sand core. It requires oxidant addition ion prior to media contact. Chlorine is the most common oxidant; however other oxidants are effective. The manganese dioxide coating acts as a catalyst in the oxidation process of both iron and manganese. These medias are evaluated in this testing. F1 filter column contained GreensandPlus® media and F2 filter column contained Mang-Oxv media. 3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION WRT/Loprest division's filter pilot test equipment is installed in a 16 ft. x 8 ft. trailer. The pilot test components are installed and pre-plumbed in the trailer for single-point supply and discharge connection at the test site. The filtration equipment includes three (3) test media filtration columns, chlorination and chemical feed addition, and all automated filtration backwash piping valves and instrumentation and process control equipment. Refer to Figure 1 for the pilot equipment general process flow diagram. The following equipment is installed in the trailer unit: • Three (3) Pulsafeeder metering pumps, with a maximum injection flow rate of 3.0 GPD, each with a dedicated solution tank and a 100 mL calibration cylinder. One pump will be used to inject sodium hypochlorite oxidizing reagent, and the second pump will be used to inject ferric chloride (if required). A third chemical injection pumping system is provided for pH control acid addition should this be required. Two chemical reagent metering pumps are required for this pilot test. Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116`Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 LOPREST Page 6 • Three (3) vertical pressure filter vessels constructed of Sch 40 PVC pipe, nominal 6-inch outside diameter(6.03 inches inside diameter)by 65-1/2 inches straight side height, cross sectional area of 0.1963 sq. ft. including flow distribution internal piping, manual and automatically controlled valves, instrumentation and controls, and filtration media bed as follows: O Slotted stainless steel strainer underdrain o Upper surface wash header/distributor 0 30 to 36 inches of 20 x 60 mesh prewashed filtration media 0 6 inches of 1/8-inch x 1/4-inch washed gravel sub fill O Automatic and separate manually operated valves to control filtration,rinse to waste, surface wash and backwash flow sequences O Pressure indicators on inlet and outlet flow piping o Vessel-mounted air release valve O Inlet and outlet valve sample ports o Rate of flow indicators for the service inlet, backwash, and surface wash flow streams • An air-scour wash system is included for media cleaning backwash. • A 200-gallon polyethylene storage tank and backwash pump. The storage tank is used to store filtered water for filter backwash operations. • PLC-based control panel, which automatically controls the filter control valves, subsurface wash and backwash pump during filter cleaning sequences. Filter cleaning sequence initiation can be controlled using elapsed service time, filter differential pressure, or manually. It is anticipated that pressure filter differential pressure will be used as the primary filter cleaning sequence initiation followed by elapsed service time initiation during this pilot testing. • Additional portable test equipment as follows: O Hach DR 900 Portable Colorimeter and accompanying reagent packs for free chlorine measurement, ammonia as well as iron and manganese measurements. o LaMotte DC1500 free chlorine test kit for free chlorine analysis. O Portable handheld probe and analyzer for pH The source water enters the pilot test unit from a connection to the raw water pressurized supply line through a hose connection to the WRT/Loprest filtration system trailer. Raw water sampling occurs at this location referred to as SP1 on the process flow diagram. The water is first directed to the filter column service inlet piping where ferric chloride and oxidant (sodium hypochlorite) reagents are added to the raw water. The pretreated water then enters the top of each media treatment column. The treated water exits the bottom of each treatment column where it is directed to the main discharge piping and out through the outlet connection on the trailer. Each treatment column is equipped with a valved effluent sample connection labeled SP2, SP3 and SP4. The media filter columns are backwashed automatically using one of several backwash trigger points set at the PLC controller. Set points for filter backwash can be initiated manually,by operating time interval,by filter differential pressure loss or by filtered water Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 7 discharge conditions. Based upon the filter run requirements and the testing protocol for the test(s) a filter backwash frequency is selected. Backwashing of the filter units is accomplished by directing treated and finished water from the integrated treated water collection tank. Backwash water supply and a mixed pressurized air supply is directed automatically to each filter column sequentially up flow through the media column to expand the media bed and release the collected solids to exit the out of the top of the filter media column. The backwashed liquid and solids are sent to the wastewater discharge connection on the trailer and directed to a backwash waste collection tank for offsite disposal. Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116th Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 LUPREST Page 8 3.4 Pilot Study Equipment and Process Flow Diagram F K 7 � r A C L R S 1 <. Cd A a w r' �. a + ay� a N Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116t'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 303 424-5355 LUIPREST Page 9 3.2 WRT/Loprest Pilot Study Equipment Photos Photo 1. Filter test column unit si - i �Y Photo 2. Filter pilot trailer �y C � 7i is a Photo 3. Reagent chemical pumping system Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116th Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 10 4.0 RAW WATER ANALYTICAL DATA A comparison of the raw water constituent levels presented in the project specifications (parenthetical figures) vs. those measured onsite are summarized below. All analytical results can be found in Appendix A of this report. Iron was sampled at levels lower than anticipated in Well 24,though contaminant concerns reported by the City of Meridian were otherwise confirmed by field and lab results. TABLE 1 RAW FEED WATER CHARACTERISTICS Concentrations expressed as average influent conditions owner provided) Constituent Well No. 26 Well No. 24 Iron, total, m /L 0.26 0.21 0.01 0.13 Manganese, total, m /L 0.058 0.1 0.061 0.1 Ammonia, m /L as N 0.09 0.063 0.03 ND 4.1 Statement of Purpose Manganese levels in water obtained from the City of Meridian Wells 26 and 24 exceed the State of Idaho Drinking Water secondary drinking water MCL value of 0.05 mg/L. Owner- provided and field measurements for dissolved iron did not return concentrations higher than the corresponding secondary MCL value of 0.3 mg/L. The purposes of this study are to evaluate the removal performance of iron and manganese from the raw water supply by both media types for the purposes of full-scale treatment implementation at well sites 26 and 24 and ensure regulatory compliance for manganese in finished water. 5.0 PILOT TEST PROTOCOL The pilot test consisted of three separate runs for each media type. The flow rate was 1.5 gpm for an 8 gpm/square foot treatment rate in the filter column for all filter runs. 5.1 Operating Procedures and Performance Testing This section describes the steps and procedures that were followed during the onsite pilot study. One of the first steps was the preparation of chemical feed stock solutions. 5.1.1 Preparation of Chemical Solutions Sodium hypochlorite(6.0%)was used to prepare the chlorine solution used during Well 26 filter runs. The dilution factor for the chlorine solution was 1.9 liters of 6 percent sodium hypochlorite into 10 gals of water. Sodium hypochlorite(7.5%)was used to prepare the chlorine solution used during Well 24 filter runs. The dilution factor for the chlorine solution was 2 liters of 7.5 percent sodium hypochlorite into 10 gals of water. Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 11 5.1.2 Operating Procedure The pilot filter columns were loaded, backwashed, and initially preconditioned at the WRT/L,oprest facility. The source of water for the first backwash was potable water from the local potable water distribution system at WRT's facility. After the first backwash,the filtered water from the pilot unit was used for backwashing. Column media was then preconditioned with approximately 4 percent hypochlorite solution for 12 hours. The same media used for the earlier City of Meridian tests was used for the Well 24 and Well 26 testing. Following filter testing at three City of Meridian well sites, the media columns were manually backwashed twice and preconditioned with a chlorine solution prior to the start of the tests. Three runs for each media type were conducted to demonstrate iron and manganese and removal and ammonia reduction capability. Following the conclusion of the three-run pilot test at each well source, the pilot system is relocated to the next well water source for a three-run test. The filter columns were operated continuously for an extended service cycle exceeding the typical backwash frequency to assess actual pressure loss and contaminant removal performance. Each filter run is separated using a backwash cycle. Sodium hypochlorite was added during all filter runs according to the preparation instructions in Section 5.1.1 and the breakpoint chlorination assessments detailed in Section 6.2. The dosing rates for each chemical are recorded on the pilot test log sheets in Appendix B. TABLE 2 PILOT RUN FEEDS AND FILTER SYSTEMS Filter Run Raw Water Source Media Type No. 1 Well 24 F1: GreensandPlus®/Anthracite F2: Man -Oxo No. 2 Well 24 F 1: GreensandPlus®/Anthracite F2: Mang- x8 No. 3 Well 24 F 1: GreensandPlus®/Anthracite F2: Mang- x6 No. 4 Well 26 F1: GreensandPlus®/Anthracite 172: Mang- x6 No. 5 Well 26 F 1: GreensandPlus®/Anthracite F2: Mang- x6 No. 6 Well 26 F1: GreensandPlus®/Anthracite F2: Man -Oxe The backwash cycle was completed in two steps: 1) draindown and air scour for 2 minutes to simulate a full-scale backwash and air scour wash combined for at a flow rate of 5 gpm/ft2 for backwash and 1 scfm/ft2 air scour then 2)backwash to waste for an additional 6 minutes at 12 gpm/ft2 (GreeensandPluso) and 20 gpm/ft2 (MangOx®) then 3) rinse to waste for 4 minutes at the service flow rate. Air scour addition with the backwash water is used to improve backwash efficiency. Effluent water was accumulated for use as backwash supply water. Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 12 During each filter run, measurements were taken and recorded at regular intervals for the following parameters: 1. filter rate of flow, gpm 2. sodium hypochlorite addition rate, mL/min 3. filter inlet and outlet free chlorine, mg/L 4. filter inlet and outlet total iron, mg/L 5. filter inlet and outlet manganese, µg/L 6. filter inlet and outlet pressure, psi 7. filter inlet and outlet nitrate, mg/L as N The above data was recorded on pilot test log sheets, which are included in the Appendix B of this report. 5.1.3 Sampling Protocol All inorganic water analyses were performed an external laboratory certified by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program. All samples are drawn into clean sample containers provided by the analytical laboratory and preserved for metal analysis. Chain of custody documentation is completed, and samples transported to the laboratory for immediate analysis. Test samples are submitted to Eurofins Eaton Analytical in Monrovia, California for analysis using EPA and Idaho state recognized testing methods for drinking water. Methods for analysis are: Total Iron EPA 200.7 Total Manganese EPA 200.7 Ammonia Nitrogen EPA 350.1 5.1.4 Sample Tests Free chlorine, iron, manganese, ammonia nitrogen, and pH were tested onsite using the instruments and procedures described in the following section. Each filter influent and effluent sample was taken in enough volume to provide the required volume for each parameter to be tested. Sample volumes were sufficient to provide a sample for offsite testing as well. The Owner's representative collected samples for the offsite independent lab analysis. 5.1.5 Onsite Test Equipment, Procedures, and Methods Field testing for iron, manganese and ammonia nitrogen are performed with a Hach DR 900. With this instrument, a sample placed within a sample cell, measured twice in the instrument by insertion into the test instrument in two steps,once as a blank for zero setting and again after sample preparation with packet(s) of reagents specific for each constituent. One sample called the blank,is inserted into the DR 900 first, and the instrument is zeroed. Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116`Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 ICiPREST Page 13 The DR 900 measures the amount of light passing through the blank sample and electronically stores the result. Next,the second prepared sample is inserted, and the value is read by the DR 900. The instrument compares the stored value for the blank to the value for the prepared sample and displays the results for the constituent being tested. For manganese, the blank is prepared with deionized water. The iron test blanks are prepared with water from the filter effluent. The test results are displayed on the digital readout. For iron, the Total Iron, FerroVer test Method 8008 is used. For manganese, Method 8149 is used. Ammonia nitrogen tests are performed using Method 8155. Chlorine analysis is performed on a LaMotte DC1500 using the DPD Method. This testis equivalent to Standard Method 4500-C 1 G. pH is measured using an Oakton pH Acorn Series Pocket pH Tester with a range of 0.0 — 10.0 pH. The probe was calibrated daily using a 7.0 pH buffer solution. 6.0 TREATMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION This section provides a performance summary of the equipment and media types evaluated during the pilot test. Refer to Section 3.0 for a complete description and specification of the pilot test equipment and field analysis test equipment. 6.1 Filter Head Loss Head loss behavior was consistent between medias, but not between the well systems tested. Pressure loss through the filter media increased for both medias during Well 26 filter runs whereas pressure losses held steady during filter runs performed for Well 24. Table 3 below illustrates the contrasting trend between well sites. Well 26 pilot systems operated under increasing pressure losses with inconsistent starting and ending values. Inlet and outlet gauge pressures and calculations for pressure loss are visible in Section 6.3 and the pilot log sheets in Appendix B. TABLE 3 PRESSURE DIFFERENCE AND RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION PILOT FILTER RUNS 1-6 JUNE 8-14, 2021 Well No. Filter GreensandPlus®(F1) Mang-Ox®(172) Runs Mean DP,psid RSD,% Mean DP,psid RSD,% 26 1-3 3.1 14.9 2.6 19.5 24 4-6 2.3 2.7 1.9 3.0 Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 14 6.2 Breakpoint Chlorination To determine the necessary dose rates for free chlorine residuals of at least 1 mg/L, breakpoint chlorination tests were performed at both wells using the hypochlorite solutions detailed in Section 5.1.1. Figures 2 and 3 display the data from these tests. Recommended hypochlorite doses are estimated for the exceedance of 1 mg/L of free chlorine after the breakpoint, at roughly 2.6 mg/L and 1.9 mg/L of NaOCI for Well 26 and Well 24 respectively. All filter runs operated at hypochlorite addition rates approximately 30% higher than these rates. Breakpoint Chlorination Curve, Well 26 2.0 1.8 1.6 tLo E 1.4 v 1.2 c 1.0 O t 0.8 U v 0.6 v 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 NaOCI addition rate, mg/L FIGURE 2 WELL 26 BREAKPOINT CHLORINATION CURVE Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 LVPREST Page 15 Breakpoint Chlorination Curve, Well 24 4.0 3.5 J bbD 3.0 E 2.5 N c 2.0 O V 1.5 N v 1.0 LL 0.5 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 NaOCI addition rate, mg/L FIGURE 3 WELL 24 BREAKPOINT CHLORINATION CURVE Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 1161h Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 16 6.3 Iron and Manganese Treatment A summary of the influent and filtered concentrations for iron, manganese, and ammonia is presented in Tables 4 through 15. Test results labeled "field" are test results from the Hach DR 900 and field test kits, and those labeled "lab" are from Eurofins Test Laboratories off-site analysis. TABLE 4 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 26, MEDIA#F1 RUN#1 JUNE 8, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.5 1 2.5 4.5 6.5 7.5 8 NaOCI feed rate,mL/min,field 11.5 11.5 11 11 11.5 11 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.18 1.28 1.54 1.27 1.24 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 1.04 1.08 1.09 1.07 1.10 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.18 0.20 0.17 0.20 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.25 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab 0.034 0.018 0.012 Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.076 0.061 0.056 0.038 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.058 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.010 0.005 0.001 0.001 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab 0.0059 0.0033 0.0027 NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.24 0.22 0.04 0.04 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.061 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0.05 0.08 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 2.4 2.8 3 3 3.2 3.2 NOTES:F1 Media=GreensandPlus®/Anthracite Flow= 1.5 GPM Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 11611 Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 LUPREST 1 Page 17 TABLE 5 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 26, MEDIA#F2 RUN#1 JUNE 8, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.5 1 2.5 4.5 6.5 7.5 8 NaOCl feed rate,tnUmin,field 11.5 11.5 11 11 11.5 11 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.18 1.28 1.54 1.27 1.24 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 0.86 0.75 0.72 0.76 0.78 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.18 0.20 0.17 0.20 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.25 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab 0.033 0.021 0.012 Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.076 0.061 0.056 0.038 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.058 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.003 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab 0.0049 0.0038 0.0029 NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.24 0.22 0.04 0.04 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.061 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0.03 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 2 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.7 NOTES:F2 Media=Mang-Ox® Flow= 1.5 GPM Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 1 LUPREST Page 18 TABLE 6 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 26, MEDIA#F1 RUN#2 JUNE 9, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.7 1 2.6 4.5 6.6 7.5 NaOCI feed rate,mL/min,field 12 12 11 11 11 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.28 1.18 1.13 1.27 1.14 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 1.19 0.99 1.01 1.01 0.99 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.27 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab 0.031 0.013 ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.052 0.058 0.054 0.058 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.004 0.004 0 0.001 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab 0.0037 0.0023 ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.08 0.12 0.10 0.13 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.07 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.0 1 3.4 3.6 NOTES:F 1 Media=GreensandPlus®/Anthracite Flow= 1.5 GPM TABLE 7 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 26, MEDIA#F2 RUN#2 JUNE 9, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.7 1 2.6 4.5 6.6 7.5 NaOCI feed rate,mL/min,field 12 12 11 11 11 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.28 1.18 1.13 1.27 1.14 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 0.86 0.75 0.76 0.69 0.73 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.27 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab 0.036 0.019 0.014 Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.052 0.058 0.054 0.058 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.003 0.007 0 0.008 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab 0.0052 0.0024 0.0022 NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.08 0.12 0.10 0.13 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0.03 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.9 3.0 NOTES:F2 Media=Mang-Ox® Flow= 1.5 GPM Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 1 LUPREST Page 19 TABLE 8 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 26, MEDIA#F1 RUN#3 JUNE 10, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.5 0.8 2.8 4.8 6.5 7.5 NaOCI feed rate,mUmin,field 12 12/13 13 13 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.31 1.13 1.32 1.28 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 1.15 0.99 0.95 1.19 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.28 0.35 0.33 0.34 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.36 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab 0.027 0.011 ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.059 0.066 0.061 0.058 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.060 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.003 0.005 0.006 0.005 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab 0.0039 ND ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.04 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.060 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 2.5 1 2.9 3.4 3.7 NOTES:F1 Media=GreensandPlus®/Anthracite Flow= 1.5 GPM TABLE 9 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 26, MEDIA#F2 RUN#3 JUNE 10, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.5 0.8 2.8 4.8 6.5 7.5 NaOCI feed rate,mL/min,field 12 12/13 13 13 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.31 1.13 1.32 1.28 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 0.91 0.67 0.83 0.86 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.28 0.35 0.33 0.34 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.36 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0.02 0.04 0.04 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab 0.032 0.015 0.012 Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.059 0.066 0.061 0.058 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.060 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.010 0.013 0.007 0.006 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab 0.0031 0.0025 0.0021 NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.04 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.060 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0.02 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 2.2 1 2.5 3.1 1 3.5 NOTES:F2 Media=Mang-Ox® Flow= 1.5 GPM Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 11611 Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 1 LUPREST Page 20 TABLE 10 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 24, MEDIA#F1 RUN#1 JUNE 12, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.3 1.3 2.3 4.3 6.3 7.3 NaOCI feed rate,rnUmin,field 6 6/7 7 7 7 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.31 1.10 1.40 1.31 1.36 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 1.23 1.00 1.16 1.21 1.25 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0 0.03 0.03 0.03 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.017 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.176 0.050 0.054 0.056 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.040 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0.019 0.024 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.02 0 0.03 0.02 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) ND NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 1 0.02 1 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND I I ND DP,psid 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 1 2.3 2.3 NOTES:F 1 Media=GreensandPlus®/Anthracite Flow= 1.5 GPM TABLE 11 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 24, MEDIA#F2 RUN#1 JUNE 12, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.3 1.3 2.3 4.3 6.3 7.3 NaOCI feed rate,mL/min,field 6 6/7 7 7 7 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.31 1.10 1.40 1.31 1.36 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 0.78 0.71 0.79 0.80 0.86 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0 0.03 0.03 0.03 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.017 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.176 0.050 0.054 0.056 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.040 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0.012 0.023 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.02 0 0.03 0.02 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) ND NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 NOTES:F2 Media=Mang-Ox® Flow= 1.5 GPM Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400, Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 1 LUPREST Page 21 TABLE 12 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 24, MEDIA#F1 RUN#2 JUNE 13, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.4 0.9 1.4 2.8 4.7 6.7 7.7 NaOCI feed rate,niUmin,field 7 7 7 7 7 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field 1.55 1.36 1.42 1.28 1.28 retreated Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 1.25 1.22 1.19 1.10 1.18 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0 0 0 0 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.055 0.056 0.051 0.050 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.210 0.026 0.019 0.021 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.01 0.02 0 0 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 1 2.2 1 2.3 1 2.2 2.3 1 2.3 1 2.4 2.3 NOTES:F 1 Media=GreensandPlus®/Anthracite Flow= 1.5 GPM TABLE 13 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 24, MEDIA#F2 RUN#2 JUNE 13,2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.4 0.9 1.4 2.8 4.7 6.7 7.7 NaOCI feed rate,niUmin,field 7 7 7 7 7 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.55 1.36 1.42 1.28 1.28 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 0.92 0.86 0.77 0.79 0.79 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0 0 0 0 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.055 0.056 0.051 0.050 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.024 0.021 0.017 0.016 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.01 0.02 0 0 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 NOTES:F2 Media=Mang-Ox® Flow= 1.5 GPM Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 1 LUPREST Page 22 TABLE 14 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 24, MEDIA#F1 RUN#3 JUNE 14, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.4 0.9 2.9 3.9 4.9 6.9 NaOCI feed rate,mL/min,field 7 7 7 7 7 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.17 1.23 1.19 1.31 1.25 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 1.07 1.10 1.01 1.18 1.17 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.02 0 0 0.03 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.010 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.054 0.063 0.059 0.051 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.037 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.023 0.013 0.023 0.018 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.20 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) ND NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 1 2.4 1 2.3 1 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 NOTES:F 1 Media=GreensandPlus®/Anthracite Flow= 1.5 GPM TABLE 15 CHLORINE, IRON, MANGANESE AND AMMONIA TEST RESULTS WELL 24, MEDIA#F2 RUN#3 JUNE 14, 2021 Hours of Service ANALYTE 0.4 0.9 2.9 3.9 4.9 6.9 NaOCI feed rate,mUmin,field 7 7 7 7 7 Cl(free)in,mg/L,field(pretreated) 1.17 1.23 1.19 1.31 1.25 Cl(free)filter out,mg/L,field 0.81 0.80 0.82 0.79 0.78 Fe in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.02 0 0 0.03 Fe in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.010 Fe filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 Fe filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND Mn in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.054 0.063 0.059 0.051 Mn in,mg/L,lab(raw) 0.037 Mn filter out,mg/L,field 0.014 0 0.019 0.026 Mn filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND NH3-N in,mg/L,field(raw) 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.20 NH3-N in,mg/L,lab(raw) ND NH3-N filter out,mg/L,field 0 0 0 0 NH3-N filter out,mg/L,lab ND ND ND DP,psid 1 1.9 2.0 1.8 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 NOTES:F2 Media=Mang-Ox® Flow= 1.5 GPM Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 23 7.0 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION NOTES This pilot study confirmed both medias as viable choices for treating iron and manganese to compliance with USEPA and Idaho State drinking water standards. Both medias removed iron and manganese to below the secondary MCL standard for each. Performance differences between GreensandPlus® and Mang-Ox® are difficult to quantify given the results, although the latter had marginally better reduction of ammonia with double the consumption of free chlorine. The columns were operated at 8 gpm/ft2 and dosed to achieve a free chlorine residual of at least 1 mg/L. Varied feed rates were used between filter runs at each well to determine the optimal chlorine dose, depending on the catalytic properties of both medias and reduction of other contaminants such as ammonia. 7.1 Contaminant removal There are no outstanding differences in contaminant removal performance for Well 26 tests. GreensandPlus® filter effluent had total iron removal, 0.004 mg/L manganese, and 0.02 mg/L ammonia nitrogen. Meanwhile Mang-Oxo filter effluent had 0.01 mg/L iron, 0.007 mg/L manganese, and 0.01 mg/L ammonia nitrogen. Notable however, is that GreensandPlus®had higher free chlorine residuals by at least 35%. Total removal of iron, as well as ammonia, was observed at Well 24 for both media systems. GreensandPlus®runs for this well had roughly double the effluent concentration of total manganese however, only treating to 0.033 mg/L versus 0.014 mg/L using Mang-W. Greensand®yielded higher free chlorine residuals for these filter runs, but by 43% for Well 24. 7.2 Pressure loss Pressure losses during Well 26 filter runs rose during service flows for both media types, ranging between 2 and 3.8 psid. The minimum and maximum head loss in both filters increased each service cycle for the three filter runs performed. Mang-Ox®tended to have lower starting head loss,though matched the pressure losses of GreensandPlus®during the third filter run. This may be attributed to the higher measured iron level in the raw water. Pressure losses during service runs remained steady for both media systems. As seen in Table 3 in Section 6.1, average pressure losses were between 1.9 and 2.3 psid and relative standard deviation below 5%. Backwashes also appeared to be successful at resetting filter operating conditions. 7.3 Recommendations GreensandPlus®is the recommended media type for treatment at Well 26. It will be a more cost-effective choice for the same removal performance with metals and ammonia, while Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 IUPREST Page 24 maintaining a higher residual free chlorine. Head loss averaged 0.5 psid greater for GreensandPlus®, though operating pressures increased similarly with each filter run. Mang-Oxo is the recommended media type for treatment at Well 24. This media had favorable operating conditions and performance across the board. The two most distinct advantages are lower pressure losses through the media and almost double the manganese removal efficiency of GreensandPlus®. Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116th Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 LLIPREST Page 25 APPENDIX A Analytical Test Results Page 25 - 65 Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116t'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical ACCREDITED 750 Royal Oaks Drive,Suite 100 CERTIFICATE#'s 5890.01&5890.02 Monrovia,California 91016-3629 Tel:(626)386-1100 Fax:(866)988-3757 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Laboratory Report for City of Meridian 2235 NW 8th Street Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Attention: Jason Smith �p pCCJ� Date of Issue v /28/2021 k:sk EUROFINS EATV/7 Utah ELCP CA00006 ANALYTICAL, LLC Report:941321 Project:SPECIAL ZIA8: Vanessa Berry Group:Pilot Study Project Manager Accredited in accordance with TNI 2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Laboratory certifies that the test results meet all TNI 2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requirements unless noted under the individual analysis. Following the cover page are State Certification List,ISO 17025 Accredited Method List,Acknowledgement of Samples Received,Comments,Hits Report, Data Report,QC Summary,QC Report and Regulatory Forms,as applicable. Test results relate only to the sample(s)tested. Test results apply to the sample(s)as received,unless otherwise noted in the comments report(ISO/IEC 17025:2017). This report shall not be reproduced except in full,without the written approval of the laboratory. This report includes ISO/IEC 17025 and non-ISO 17025 accredited methods. Page 1 of 22 pages tiff eurof ins Eaton Analytical STATE CERTIFICATION LIST State Certification Number State Certification Number Alabama 41060 Montana Cert 0035 Arizona AZ0778 Nebraska Certified Arkansas Certified Nevada CA000062018 California 2813 New Hampshire* 2959 Colorado Certified New Jersey* CA 008 Connecticut PH-0107 New Mexico Certified Delaware CA 006 New York* 11320 Florida* E871024 North Carolina 06701 Georgia 947 North Dakota R-009 Guam 18-005R Oregon * CA200003-005 Hawaii Certified Pennsylvania* 68-565 Idaho Certified Puerto Rico Certified Illinois* 200033 Rhode Island LAO00326 Indiana C-CA-01 South Carolina 87016 Iowa-Asbestos 413 South Dakota Certified Kansas* E-10268 Tennessee TN02839 Kentucky 90107 Texas* T104704230-18-15 Louisiana* LA180000 Utah (Primary AB)* CA00006 Maine CA0006 Vermont VT0114 Maryland 224 Virginia* 460260 Commonwealth of MP0004 Washington C838 Northern Marianas Is. Massachusetts M-CA006 EPA Region 5 Certified Michigan 9906 Los Angeles County 10264 Sanitation Districts Mississippi Certified * NELAP/TNI Recognized Accreditation Bodies Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC 750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100 T 1 626-386-1100 Monrovia, CA 91016-3629 F 1 866-988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton Page 2 of 22 pages I50/IEC 17025 Accredited Method List The tests listed below are accredited and meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 as verified by the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board/A2LA. Refer to Certificate and scope of accreditation(5890)found at:https://www.eurofinsus.com/Eaton nvtr n- nvtr n- nvrron- nvrron- mental mental voter° mental mental wore`os o METHOD OR component or Food METHOD OR compooeot or Food SPECIFIC TESTS TECHNIQUE USED (Drinking (Waste and Bev/Bev/ SPECIFIC TESTS TECHNIQUE USED (Drinking (Waste and Bev/Bev/ Water) Water) Boated voter Water) Water) Bottled water 1,2,3-TCP(5 PPT&0.5 CA SRL 524M-TCP x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.7 x x PPT) 1,4-Dioxane EPA 522 x x Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500-Cr B x 2,3,7,8-TCDD Modified EPA 1613B x x Hormones EPA 539 x x Actylamide In House Method(2440) x x Hydroxide as OH Calc. SM 2330B x x Algal Toxins/Microcystin In House Method 3570 K'eldahl Nitrogen EPA 351.2 x Alkalinity SM 2320B x x x Le ionella Le iolert x x Ammonia EPA 350.1 x x Mercury EPA 200.8 x x Ammonia SM 4500-NH3 H x x Metals EPA 200.7/200.8 x x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.0 x x x Microcystin LR ELISA(2360) x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.1 x x Microcystin,Total EPA 546 x x Asbestos EPA 100.2 x x NDMA EEA/Agilent 521.1In house method 2425) x x BOD/CBOD SM 5210B x x Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen EPA 353.2 x x x Bromate In House Method(2447) x x OCL,Pesticides/PCB EPA 505 x x Carbamates EPA 531.2 x x Ortho Phosphate EPA 365.1 x x x Carbonate as CO3 SM 2330B x x x Ortho Phosphorous SM 4500P E x x Carbonyls EPA 556 x x Oxyhalides Disinfection EPA 317.0 x x Bvoroducts COD EPA 410.4/SM 5220D x Perchlorate EPA 331.0 x x Chloramines SM 4500-CL G x x x Perchlorate (low and high) EPA 314.0 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 515.4 x x Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids EPA 537 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 555 x x Perfluorinated Polutant In house Method(2434) x x Chlorine Dioxide SM 4500-CLO2 D x x pH EPA 150.1 x Palin Test Chlorine SM 4500-Cl G x x x pH SM 4500-H+B x x x Residual Combinedd Residualual Conductivity EPA 120.1 x Phcnylurea Pesticides/ In House Method,based on EPA x x Herbicides 532(2448) Conductivity SM 2510B x x x Pseudomonas IDEXX Pseudalert(2461) x x Corrosivity(Langelier Index) SM 2330B x x Radium-226 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide,Amenable SM 4500-CN G x x Radium-228 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide,Free SM 45000N F x x x Radon-222 SM 750ORN x x Cyanide,Total EPA 335.4 x x x Residue,Filterable SM 2540C x x x Cyanogen Chloride In House Method(2470) x x Residue,Non-filterable SM 2540D x (screen) Diquat and Paraquat EPA 549.2 x x Residue,Total SM 2540B x x DBP/HAA SM 6251B x x Residue,Volatile EPA 160.4 x Dissolved Oxygen SM 4500-0 G x x Semi-VOC EPA 525.2 x x DOC SM 5310C x x Silica SM 4500-Si D x x E.Coli (MTF/EC+MUG) x x Silica SM 4500-SiO2 C x x E.Coli CFR 141.21(f)(6)(i) x x Sulfide SM 4500-5-D x E.Coli SM 9223 x Sulfite SM 4500-S03B x x x E.Coli(Enumeration) SM 9221B.1/SM 9221F x x Surfactants SM 5540C x x x E.Coli(Enumeration) SM 9223B x x Taste and Odor Anal es SM 6040E x x EDB/DCBP EPA 504.1 x Total Coliform(P/A) SM 9221 A,B x x EDB/DBCP and DBP EPA 551.1 x x Total Coliform SM 9221 A,B,C x x (Enumeration) EDTA and NTA In House Method(2454) x x Total Coliform/E.coli Colisure SM 9223 x x Endothall EPA 548.1 x x Total Coliform SM 9221B x Total Coliform with Chlorine SM 9221B x Endothall In-house Method(2445) x x Present Enterococci SM 9230B x x Total Coliform/E.coli(P/A SM 9223 x x and Enumeration) Fecal Coliform SM 9221 E(MTF/EC) x TOC SM 5310C x x x Fecal Coliform SM 9221C,E(MTF/EC) x TOX SM 5320B x Fecal Coliform SM 9221E(MTF/EC) x x Total Phenols EPA 420.1 x (Enumeration) Fecal Coliform with SM 9221E x Total Phenols EPA 420.4 x x x Chlorine Present Fecal Streptococci SM 9230B x x Total Phosphorous SM 4500 P E x Fluoride SM 4500-F C x x x Triazine Pesticides& In House(3617) x x Degradates Glyphosate EPA 547 x x Turbidity EPA 180.1 x x x Gl hosate+AMPA In House Method(3618) x x Turbidity SM 2130B x x Gross Alpha/Beta EPA 900.0 x x x Uranium by ICP/MS EPA 200.8 x x Gross Alpha Coprecipitation SM 7110 C x x x 11V 254 SM 5910B x Hardness SM 2340B x x x VOC EPA 524.2 x x Heterotrophic Bacteria In House Method(2439) x x VOC In House Method(2411) x x Heterotrophic Bacteria SM 9215 B x x Yeast and Mold SM 9610 x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.6 x x x Field Sampling N/A 750 Royal Oaks Dr.,Ste 100,Monrovia,CA 91016 Tel(626)386-1100 Fax(866)988-3757 https://www.eurofinsus.com/Eaton Version 006 issued:05/04/20 Page 3 of 22 pages eurofins Eaton Analytical Acknowledgement of Samples Received Addr: City of Meridian Client ID: MERIDIAN-ID 2235 NW 8th Street Folder#: 941321 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Project: SPECIAL Sample Group: Pilot Study Attn: Jason Smith Project Manager: Vanessa Berry Phone: 208-519-0003 Phone: 503-310-3905 The following samples were received from you on June 16,2021 at 1319. They have been scheduled for the tests listed below each sample. If this information is incorrect, please contact your service representative. Thank you for using Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC. Sample# Sample ID Sample Date 202106170100 Well 26 F1 06/09/2021 1500 ............................................................................................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ...................................................................................... 202106170101 Well 26 RAW 06/10/2021 0845 ................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............................................................................................................. 202106170102 Well 26 F1 06/10/2021 0845 ............................................................................................ Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ................................................................. 202106170103 Well 26 F2 06/10/2021 0845 ......................................................................... .............. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP -: .................................................................................... ..................• 202106170104 Well 26 06/10/2021 " ....................................................................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............................... ...................................................................... 202106170105 Well 26 F2 06/10/2021 1215 ............................................................................................. ... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ...........................................................................................................................• 202106170106 Well 26 F1 06/10/2021 1500 ................................................................. ................................ Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............................................................. .............• 202106170107 Well 26 F2 06/10/2021 1500 ............................................................................................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP .......................................................................................................... 202106170581 Well 26 RAW 06/08/2021 0830 .............................................................................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP .......................................................................................... ............ 202106170582 Well 26 F1 06/08/2021 0830 ..................................................................................................... ........... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............................................................................................. 202106170583 Well 26 F2 06/08/2021 0830 ................................................................................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP .................................................................................... 202106170584 Well 26 F 06/08/2021 1200 ............................................................................................................ Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ..................................................................... 202106170585 Well 26 F2 M 06/08/2021 1200 ................................................................................ Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP .................................................................................................... Reported: 06/28/2021 Page 1 of 2 750 Royal Oaks Drive,Suite 100,Monrovia,CA 91016 Tel(626)386-1100 Fax(866)988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton Page 4 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Acknowledgement of Samples Received Addr: City of Meridian Client ID: MERIDIAN-ID 2235 NW 8th Street Folder#: 941321 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Project: SPECIAL Sample Group: Pilot Study Attn: Jason Smith Project Manager: Vanessa Berry Phone: 208-519-0003 Phone: 503-310-3905 The following samples were received from you on June 16,2021 at 1319. They have been scheduled for the tests listed below each sample. If this information is incorrect, please contact your service representative. Thank you for using Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC. Sample# Sample ID Sample Date 202106170586 Well 26 F1 06/08/2021 1500 Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP 202106170587 Well 26 F2 06/08/2021 1500 Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............• 202106170588 Well 26 F1 06/09/2021 0830 ................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ..................... ........................ ...............� 202106170589 Well 26 F2 06/09/2021 0830 .......................................................... ............ Ammonia Nitrogen Manganese Total ICAP ................................................................................. ....................• 202106170590 Well 26 F1 06/09/202 ................................................................................................................ Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............... ................. ........... .................• 202106170591 Well 26 F2 06/09/2021 1200 ........... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP 202106170592 Well 26 F2 06/09/2021 1500 Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP Test Description Reported: 06/28/2021 Page 2 of 2 750 Royal Oaks Drive,Suite 100, Monrovia,CA 91016 Tel(626)386-1100 Fax(866)988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton Page 5 of 22 pages u; U. zIL wz N u < Uo � � � h Y oui col) .9 -0 � J m NU 7L a 3 G. V a ' ra o O ,. m CO o O a n U -2 � LI (+ *J Q z P wJ U � J It II U Oj o z z N U d C C Q Z C al Z_ O U v v c J Z u�i — 3 a p o f g X a) u) cn O N U U a O a Q W a a LL JILL 11 II p J 0 V z W n O Y 0 a> Z U U cA N U Q 0 r r- O W U O ❑ Z -J `m U us `a �oF w W W U UCL Q H O O N W d 11 LL a,J i C (a U w C } U o tl m z 0 m a W Q V U o w N ' m O m Cn U U 7 GIN U Z m LU O ❑ Z In © < SrL cn O to o �.. � � � � �0. cCD os a � m � � Z�y !� 1 l > > > � �, 0 0 � a, �, - �: 0 LL _ r rn U O � O r z T VIVO a931.4 Z v z 171 QO a I alaaaialj m T m :3 V Q O O s T z N XMIM ` �L 1{� LL T 2 io N y C C U � a M a E ZO w O u E p ❑ 1 m J Q a _ ¢Zw W a w O r ULU L O U3 y O o WA z OW Q[L 1 p E° Ill LL a a p U)❑® LLII CL O Ira N ro 1� U .+� a) -0 a o ° _ jL11�. cn c7 c m c.i U (D W !1. O N U d z O p00 al >CD Z os co ,_ m uj Inc IL r 3 W N JW {W� O I ``-- - ;m m 0 j .@ (D [O 4 Q r\y N 3WI1 V if, f]) K y > o > N O '0 ��f3 N O Z XLU l ; 3ldWVS b y 1� +� LLB °a u� ❑ a' ❑ N C O >< O -0 U Q w w ❑ w ❑ w a L. 0 � (p W d��~ 3iVG .yr- d LL ao \Jr g O F 3ldWVS * < � Page 6 of 22 pages » / k g q CO LO \ _ £ 2 § G S ) { § \ \ ( 7 \ \ a ° U \3 kk00 \co �co � co k\\\ �§ / @R ? = °erg � ) , § �G§d \� 2 0 2 E � m � m \ M=M , f % / § \ � 4) =£ o CLg.3 _ R ! a 2 0k / �=k ƒ k 2C� C @ƒ _$ �© % / oi 0n § u�a V-§£ m oz$ & ma z �2 S ®§ § � � Lr-c U & 0) � e J�k \ ]\ k § f 2 0 � � ° °© m 0 3 0 k � zk ' 5fQ & £ � \ 00 ® e . mo� � J& CL - - k � /2k k \ \ �A A \ k CL e LO o co 0 ) 0 $ $ 2 0 CN S J )� =G � Gm2 f§ = 25= e� 7 EI� §k 2)zm ca a k CL � G < . \ { ° §§R o e d k& § \)k o§\ § a a m_mo ° m 2 (fs \ )\Mk % W 22} ££§ E 42) & «k§ atm � . � � f cu\\ k § 2 _\ o \ 7,00 o m / � -/ 3 ' / E /)/ / k § § § f a _o < — R E e E o o § § k§ u ® ® @ Q 3 0 Page 7of22pages N U T CrL N b 10 C U W is M Y 0 ELL aF N JAf Z N 1� '.l `o z O`` J LU m f Y 3 a. ` LU J v x U) U t a LF W V y O l� } } z co � ❑ v � t co p .c Q W ? c� II LU U Z F F to O a�i O W V W - u II U ] a ZQ Z Z c a� +9 \7 p c Z Q U Iv c J z O N 0 Q J IL N a 0 ¢ En .0 ' C7 0 p t— m cn Q w } U o o Q a II 11 W CL ❑ a Z (5 O W fA LO Y ❑ c O W v ��. ❑ V Q uU] m �D Z Qr J m V N p p ~ IL CZ a w 7 a 4 c m L) Z O V u' E > �1 U Q N U U o m cLi w in E m O LL m u) a `L1 W V) - " J .0, W � II R 0. Q LL t1( lil _ R; r l7 � f - 0 ❑ W u) ❑ I}�r a) � cn ❑ °' Y w O F n II cn ¢ v o o p a � VW ' °' z a� U z 0 LL co Z z0 13 0 `� r.( ++1 1 n Y C� aiaa 0131d � 2 C v a `F A m z LL li It H c r Q T ala0 U131-4 Q Ell ``I V [] v \ T C C LL N L a y 2 7 UU Q (n w ni .7(RIlaW 4[I Iu W a w Y � w Z �' a N LL ❑ CL th E w emi IY O O A te_ O I m LL ro m ID W 0 uj Q F 1 U VV V 3 J U = Cl) 0 � U H Lu Q z II II 0 1L W I _ 7 z a s 0 0 a J 0 n° � a m U LU J N 10 10 07 N U U G O m LU IL f+ �_ N U 2 0 1' fp ) a p II 11 a wO C 4 ll.l o l� IY n( ry N i7 r N r Ocu O [ o t� (D OT LLl op �^ s tU 1 d �] ul i ` LU Y O U W i CL o O U `�' co`Q °° w °0 1 = � m L m N C9 \ U ) O n �} n ❑ (0 24 a m Dwll r r} ,,c^c]] R{ X W r w r O_ U7 N (D -cn O 2 W_ 3ldWVS CD $ Gp .U,L Y� J� co `n o ❑ N G U Q H w w D w c LO 0 t ca O w 31tla Q a z w z w 0 •o r— a LL ao m �� Nu r a g : U � U O v y a e a Page 8 of 22 pages `o rn � 1 c¢n 0 iD 0 N O N M LO QI E F- W ~ O m N C') m N p p N c0 a Z Z Z O Cl > > > ) f0 a. 0 0 � M o N N U) 00 a) m L 00 CO a 6�Q U)O a N a N 2 Qa c D OJ O N N� cn w Z F- C O U')— C N a) 0 d N cm d mCUN� Qn. w 00 U m E m o U � N - E =_ 3 o -' 3 O o a) C a m a) N m Q �, 7 N Z M w o 0 C �•J a a N C) C o 00 .�'. Q fA Q Q L i)CIO .L..O O O � _ C)) O r U m N O OU)M 6) C)C)w o m 00 E r d L. m r- w—a o- •C�t (P O m O Z o W = ��cn a z 0 80- o o _ rn 4) C d Q m a) ik Ct Z N m N d N U � p '- r a E m ;5 a 0)n10 -' c a E m Y T Um oZ ' - m >, paw ni p a �i = 0pd 0 ILd a m N `m a (� E E CL m to a a`) E c N cn m m m c O 5 z 0 0 O N Cl) ++ CV __ N C O Y Nmccoo EO _ m-O L to`n Q) O 0 C) a B;; ¢ cc c 0)NEL d h C. cn._ Q L f` N =...N y rt U U) r C:)Q)M C N fn U N Q a. ' 0(NO 00 m C',N-O m m O rn NNO H p V a)'" } N �Q)X� N Om? m to p`E, a+ m In I.- CL C ca AD Pf Y-0 C:) Y a � U rn rn Om o to cmi o Q CDn U) ` o o M U p w d can � 2co 0Hr �N+ E O O N H ti�� E o N 2 al Q ~ c a E � U ao NN VOC)C a1 :ij N Page 9 of 22 pages N ^, a W C V U z a 3 Z.LU UJI v O U U s U y ° 2 Ua) a 9 m a u W U _ a IL Cal p ? F Q � m v II c U U Z N J a) r 0 w J a W u a V > O c a z z a) J Z U i� sL c Z — a J p s W f/3 a } U LL a 0 g I II ❑ 0 a C? : z w a 0 � Y O c D W U o U a � �- z f ❑ W Q 0 a a $ fro m uUr to w u aEr `� a Or g H x Li F �' o z I f 1 O O N LL [U N O cs L ❑ W N L3 Q •!:. O IF a. 0 4 m ,� Jan: N � o W z z � 2 � � 3 O ICI I}C O U7 Q Q O I77 fil ii1 0 0 - r- n a a " w � m mT1 LU Z O �' � � 7 vlra a�al� z CL _ Z 14 z_ 111 0 O e V U r Q viva Ul31'J rU ` r - C� lL ILL � •l Z e d u_ O U Z w cc O 0 m q\ m oLL 1il U O w 0 U Y +} ;� z II p ih U ~ ILL � u Z_ -a o f 0 2 ff ¢ -3 'i O c 3 � u a IL rn d c� U u�) U)❑© F 9 76 -FuU W J tt o m J 1� tL l" toa fll - U '_' IL CO v C Q .../ .J �. •� II [I y c vs � j o u�i a E0 (9 n LY O C� ri © ti W O 1 kk r E Z- N 3WI.L -a f` .3 X w } w r J n o w cot r 1 a O �awesi y_ o I� to 'w o z > ai a ' .9 Q z I� £1 LL ip O ¢37dWVS ¢ z w Or oil Q L) W H Page 10 of 22 pages 2 . k I a ) q Ln ) t § a £ k00d d § \ § 2 q CL § \ ) ■ ;=§ )§ e�= k��f %§ / a8 \ %RR c e § ¢ § MG§£ #E 0 § CL m o § § _ . 2 0 M -i0 Cl (a © ) 0cc $�_—j � ] 2 C IK \ q § k 2�w § § a ;w§ o kJ k 8G a c w�a - o r5E V)' z # w ■�mE z CLw- §B § � X E 2 - k k § di e WE to ]� 2 J4 \ j § ©Zrk �Ac4 CL k� © � 0 k k a. CL � 0 Z E� ecc MI) m CL A $ i m t B. 0 . ■ � — B 0 I R 2 a § n A 2 C &eCO {� C9® n ®§ 7 E$m\ 0n 2 \ CL § / _ /r4 /k oCD^ _042 - — a 2 « 02 ©C2 2 910 e �k% f]§ i — ) > m k§�k m _ g ak§ § taS 2 2-� cu / s \ 0 —0( 2 ) k o ) 00 ca 0\ 2 E \ f f k j k » % & o § 7/N CM Q o Page 9 92 page tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Comments Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941321 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Flags Legend: M2-Matrix spike recovery was low;the associated blank spike recovery was acceptable. R4-MS/MSD RPD exceeded the method acceptance limit. Recovery met acceptance criteria. The Comments Report may be blank if there are no comments for this report. Page 12 of 22 pages eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Hits Report: 941321 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 06/16/2021 1319 2235 NW 8th Street Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Analyzed Analyte Sample ID Result Federal MCL Units MRL 202106170101 Well 26 RAW 06/24/2021 12:22 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.060 mg/L 0.050 06/21/2021 13:49 Iron Total ICAP 0.36 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:49 Manganese Total ICAP 0.060 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170102 Well 26 F1 06/21/2021 13:50 Iron Total ICAP 0.027 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:50 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0039 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170103 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 13:53 Iron Total ICAP 0.032 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:53 nganese Total ICAP 0.0031 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170104 Well 26 F1 06/21/2021 13:54 Iron Total ICAP 0.011 0.3 mg/L 0.010 202106170105 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 13:55 Iron Total ICAP 0.015 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:55 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0025 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170107 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 13:57 Iron Total ICAP 0.012 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:57 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0021 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170581 Well 26 RAW 06/24/2021 13:32 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.061 mg/L 0.050 06/21/2021 14:13 Iron Total ICAP 0.25 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:13 nganese Total ICAP 0.058 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170582 Well 26 F1 06/21/2021 14:07 Iron Total ICAP 0.034 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:07 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0059 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170583 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 14:08 Iron Total ICAP 0.033 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:08 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0049 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170584 Well 26 F1 06/21/2021 14:09 Iron Total ICAP 0.018 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:09 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0033 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170585 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 14:10 Iron Total ICAP 0.021 0.3 mg/L 0.010 SUMMARY OF POSITIVE DATA ONLY Page 13 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Hits Report: 941321 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 06/16/2021 1319 2235 NW 8th Street Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Analyzed Analyte Sample ID Result Federal MCL Units MRL 06/21/2021 14:10 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0038 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170586 Well 26 F1 06/21/2021 14:11 Iron Total ICAP 0.012 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:11 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0027 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170587 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 14:12 Iron Total ICAP 0.016 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:12 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0029 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170588 Well 26 F1 06/21/2021 13:58 Iron Total ICAP 0.031 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:58 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0037 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170589 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 13:59 Iron Total ICAP 0.036 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:59 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0052 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170590 Well 26 F1 06/21/2021 14:00 Iron Total ICAP 0.013 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:00 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0023 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170591 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 14:05 Iron Total ICAP 0.019 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:05 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0024 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170592 Well 26 F2 06/21/2021 14:06 Iron Total ICAP 0.014 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 14:06 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0022 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 SUMMARY OF POSITIVE DATA ONLY Page 14 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941321 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1319 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Well 26 F1 (202106170100) Sampled on 06/09/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:46 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:46 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:19 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND(M2,R4) mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 RAW(202106170101) Sampled on 06/10/2021 0845 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:49 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.36 mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:49 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.060 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:22 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen 0.060 mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170102) Sampled on 06/10/2021 0845 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:50 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.027 mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:50 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0039 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:57 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170103) Sampled on 06/10/2021 0845 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:53 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.032 mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:53 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0031 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:58 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170104) Sampled on 06/10/2021 1215 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:54 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.011 mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:54 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:24 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170105) Sampled on 06/10/2021 1215 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:55 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.015 mg/L 0.010 1 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 15 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941321 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1319 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:55 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0025 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:25 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170106) Sampled on 06/10/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:56 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:56 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:26 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170107) Sampled on 06/10/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:57 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.012 mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:57 1335663 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0021 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:27 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 RAW(202106170581) Sampled on 06/08/2021 0830 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:13 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.25 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:13 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.058 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:32 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen 0.061 mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170582) Sampled on 06/08/2021 0830 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:07 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.034 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:07 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0059 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:35 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170583) Sampled on 06/08/2021 0830 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:08 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.033 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:08 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0049 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:36 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170584) Sampled on 06/08/2021 1200 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 16 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941321 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1319 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:09 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.018 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:09 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0033 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:37 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170585) Sampled on 06/08/2021 1200 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:10 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.021 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:10 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0038 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:39 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170586) Sampled on 06/08/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:11 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.012 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:11 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0027 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:40 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170587) Sampled on 06/08/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:12 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.016 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:12 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0029 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:43 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170588) Sampled on 06/09/2021 0830 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 13:58 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.031 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 13:58 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0037 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:44 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170589) Sampled on 06/09/2021 0830 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 13:59 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.036 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 13:59 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0052 mg/L 0.0020 1 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 17 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941321 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1319 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:46 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F1 (202106170590) Sampled on 06/09/2021 1200 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:00 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.013 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:00 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0023 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:47 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170591) Sampled on 06/09/2021 1200 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:05 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.019 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:05 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0024 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:53 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND(M2) mg/L 0.050 1 Well 26 F2(202106170592) Sampled on 06/09/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:06 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.014 mg/L 0.010 1 06/18/21 06/21/21 14:06 1335731 1336111 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.0022 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 13:56 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 18 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Summary Report: 941321 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian ICP Metals Prep Batch: 1335663 Analytical Batch: 1336111 Analysis Date: 06/21/2021 202106170100 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170101 Well 26 RAW Analyzed by: NINA 202106170102 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170103 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170104 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170105 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170106 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170107 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170581 Well 26 RAW Analyzed by: NINA 202106170582 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170583 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170584 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170585 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170586 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170587 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170588 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170589 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170590 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170591 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170592 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: NINA Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Batch: 1337104 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 202106170102 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170103 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170581 Well 26 RAW Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170582 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170583 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170584 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170585 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170586 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170587 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170588 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170589 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170590 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170591 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170592 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Batch: 1337362 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 202106170100 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170101 Well 26 RAW Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170104 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170105 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170106 Well 26 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 Page 19 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Summary Report: 941321 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian 202106170107 Well 26 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 Page 20 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 941321 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%o) Limits(%) Limit(%) RPD% ICP Metals by EPA 200.7 Analytical Batch: 1336111 Analysis Date: 06/21/2021 LCS1 Iron Total ICAP 5 5.16 mg/L 103 (85-115) LCS2 Iron Total ICAP 5 5.16 mg/L 103 (85-115) 20 0.0 MBLK Iron Total ICAP <0.004850 mg/L MRL_CHK Iron Total ICAP 0.01 0.0103 mg/L 103 (50-150) MS_202106170100 Iron Total ICAP ND 5 5.22 mg/L 104 (70-130) MS2_202106170590 Iron Total ICAP 0.013 5 5.15 mg/L 103 (70-130) MSD_202106170100 Iron Total ICAP ND 5 5.20 mg/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.35 MSD2_202106170590 Iron Total ICAP 0.013 5 5.21 mg/L 104 (70-130) 20 1.2 LCS1 Manganese Total ICAP 2 2.05 mg/L 103 (85-115) LCS2 Manganese Total ICAP 2 2.04 mg/L 102 (85-115) 20 0.0 MBLK Manganese Total ICAP <0.000700 mg/L MRL_CHK Manganese Total ICAP 0.002 0.00219 mg/L 110 (50-150) MS_202106170100 Manganese Total ICAP ND 2 2.07 mg/L 103 (70-130) MS2_202106170590 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0023 2 2.04 mg/L 102 (70-130) MSD_202106170100 Manganese Total ICAP ND 2 2.05 mg/L 103 (70-130) 20 1.0 MSD2_202106170590 Manganese Total ICAP 0.0023 2 2.06 mg/L 103 (70-130) 20 1.0 Ammonia Nitrogen by EPA 350.1 Analytical Batch: 1337104 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 LCS3 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 0.992 mg/L 99 (90-110) LCS4 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 1.01 mg/L 101 (90-110) 20 1.8 MBLK Ammonia Nitrogen <0.00674 mg/L MRL_CHK Ammonia Nitrogen 0.05 0.0530 mg/L 106 (79-126) MS1_202106170581 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.061 1 1.15 mg/L 109 (90-110) MS1_202106170591 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.682 mg/L 68 (90-110) MSD1_202106170581 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.061 1 1.13 mg/L 107 (90-110) 20 1.8 MSD1_202106170591 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.736 mg/L 73 (90-110) 20 7.6 Ammonia Nitrogen by EPA 350.1 Analytical Batch: 1337362 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 LCS3 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 0.981 mg/L 98 (90-110) LCS4 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 0.993 mg/L 99 (90-110) 20 1.2 MBLK Ammonia Nitrogen <0.00674 mg/L MRL_CHK Ammonia Nitrogen 0.05 0.0510 mg/L 102 (79-126) MS1_202106170089 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.834 mg/L 82 (90-110) MS1_202106170100 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 1.02 mg/L 102 (90-110) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only,batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only,unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL(Minimum Reporting Level). (S)-Indicates surrogate compound. (1)-Indicates internal standard compound. Page 21 of 22 pages eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 941321 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits(%) Limit(%) RPD% MSD1_202106170089 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.584 mg/L 57 (90-110) 20 35 MSD1_202106170100 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.716 mg/L 71 (90-110) 20 35 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only,batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only,unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL(Minimum Reporting Level). (S)-Indicates surrogate compound. (1)-Indicates internal standard compound. Page 22 of 22 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical ACCREDITED 750 Royal Oaks Drive,Suite 100 CERTIFICATE#'s 5890.01&5890.02 Monrovia,California 91016-3629 Tel:(626)386-1100 Fax:(866)988-3757 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Laboratory Report for City of Meridian 2235 NW 8th Street Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Attention: Jason Smith �p pCCJ� Date of Issue v /28/2021 k:sk EUROFINS EATV/7 Utah ELCP CA00006 ANALYTICAL, LLC Report:941320 Project:SPECIAL ZIA8: Vanessa Berry Group:Pilot Study Project Manager Accredited in accordance with TNI 2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Laboratory certifies that the test results meet all TNI 2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requirements unless noted under the individual analysis. Following the cover page are State Certification List,ISO 17025 Accredited Method List,Acknowledgement of Samples Received,Comments,Hits Report, Data Report,QC Summary,QC Report and Regulatory Forms,as applicable. Test results relate only to the sample(s)tested. Test results apply to the sample(s)as received,unless otherwise noted in the comments report(ISO/IEC 17025:2017). This report shall not be reproduced except in full,without the written approval of the laboratory. This report includes ISO/IEC 17025 and non-ISO 17025 accredited methods. Page 1 of 18 pages tiff eurof ins Eaton Analytical STATE CERTIFICATION LIST State Certification Number State Certification Number Alabama 41060 Montana Cert 0035 Arizona AZ0778 Nebraska Certified Arkansas Certified Nevada CA000062018 California 2813 New Hampshire* 2959 Colorado Certified New Jersey* CA 008 Connecticut PH-0107 New Mexico Certified Delaware CA 006 New York* 11320 Florida* E871024 North Carolina 06701 Georgia 947 North Dakota R-009 Guam 18-005R Oregon * CA200003-005 Hawaii Certified Pennsylvania* 68-565 Idaho Certified Puerto Rico Certified Illinois* 200033 Rhode Island LAO00326 Indiana C-CA-01 South Carolina 87016 Iowa-Asbestos 413 South Dakota Certified Kansas* E-10268 Tennessee TN02839 Kentucky 90107 Texas* T104704230-18-15 Louisiana* LA180000 Utah (Primary AB)* CA00006 Maine CA0006 Vermont VT0114 Maryland 224 Virginia* 460260 Commonwealth of MP0004 Washington C838 Northern Marianas Is. Massachusetts M-CA006 EPA Region 5 Certified Michigan 9906 Los Angeles County 10264 Sanitation Districts Mississippi Certified * NELAP/TNI Recognized Accreditation Bodies Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC 750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100 T 1 626-386-1100 Monrovia, CA 91016-3629 F 1 866-988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton Page 2 of 18 pages I50/IEC 17025 Accredited Method List The tests listed below are accredited and meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 as verified by the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board/A2LA. Refer to Certificate and scope of accreditation(5890)found at:https://www.eurofinsus.com/Eaton nvtr n- nvtr n- nvrron- nvrron- mental mental voter° mental mental wore`os o METHOD OR component or Food METHOD OR compooeot or Food SPECIFIC TESTS TECHNIQUE USED (Drinking (Waste and Bev/Bev/ SPECIFIC TESTS TECHNIQUE USED (Drinking (Waste and Bev/Bev/ Water) Water) Boated voter Water) Water) Bottled water 1,2,3-TCP(5 PPT&0.5 CA SRL 524M-TCP x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.7 x x PPT) 1,4-Dioxane EPA 522 x x Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500-Cr B x 2,3,7,8-TCDD Modified EPA 1613B x x Hormones EPA 539 x x Actylamide In House Method(2440) x x Hydroxide as OH Calc. SM 2330B x x Algal Toxins/Microcystin In House Method 3570 K'eldahl Nitrogen EPA 351.2 x Alkalinity SM 2320B x x x Le ionella Le iolert x x Ammonia EPA 350.1 x x Mercury EPA 200.8 x x Ammonia SM 4500-NH3 H x x Metals EPA 200.7/200.8 x x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.0 x x x Microcystin LR ELISA(2360) x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300.1 x x Microcystin,Total EPA 546 x x Asbestos EPA 100.2 x x NDMA EEA/Agilent 521.1In house method 2425) x x BOD/CBOD SM 5210B x x Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen EPA 353.2 x x x Bromate In House Method(2447) x x OCL,Pesticides/PCB EPA 505 x x Carbamates EPA 531.2 x x Ortho Phosphate EPA 365.1 x x x Carbonate as CO3 SM 2330B x x x Ortho Phosphorous SM 4500P E x x Carbonyls EPA 556 x x Oxyhalides Disinfection EPA 317.0 x x Bvoroducts COD EPA 410.4/SM 5220D x Perchlorate EPA 331.0 x x Chloramines SM 4500-CL G x x x Perchlorate (low and high) EPA 314.0 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 515.4 x x Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids EPA 537 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 555 x x Perfluorinated Polutant In house Method(2434) x x Chlorine Dioxide SM 4500-CLO2 D x x pH EPA 150.1 x Palin Test Chlorine SM 4500-Cl G x x x pH SM 4500-H+B x x x Residual Combinedd Residualual Conductivity EPA 120.1 x Phcnylurea Pesticides/ In House Method,based on EPA x x Herbicides 532(2448) Conductivity SM 2510B x x x Pseudomonas IDEXX Pseudalert(2461) x x Corrosivity(Langelier Index) SM 2330B x x Radium-226 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide,Amenable SM 4500-CN G x x Radium-228 GA Institute of Tech x x Cyanide,Free SM 45000N F x x x Radon-222 SM 750ORN x x Cyanide,Total EPA 335.4 x x x Residue,Filterable SM 2540C x x x Cyanogen Chloride In House Method(2470) x x Residue,Non-filterable SM 2540D x (screen) Diquat and Paraquat EPA 549.2 x x Residue,Total SM 2540B x x DBP/HAA SM 6251B x x Residue,Volatile EPA 160.4 x Dissolved Oxygen SM 4500-0 G x x Semi-VOC EPA 525.2 x x DOC SM 5310C x x Silica SM 4500-Si D x x E.Coli (MTF/EC+MUG) x x Silica SM 4500-SiO2 C x x E.Coli CFR 141.21(f)(6)(i) x x Sulfide SM 4500-5-D x E.Coli SM 9223 x Sulfite SM 4500-S03B x x x E.Coli(Enumeration) SM 9221B.1/SM 9221F x x Surfactants SM 5540C x x x E.Coli(Enumeration) SM 9223B x x Taste and Odor Anal es SM 6040E x x EDB/DCBP EPA 504.1 x Total Coliform(P/A) SM 9221 A,B x x EDB/DBCP and DBP EPA 551.1 x x Total Coliform SM 9221 A,B,C x x (Enumeration) EDTA and NTA In House Method(2454) x x Total Coliform/E.coli Colisure SM 9223 x x Endothall EPA 548.1 x x Total Coliform SM 9221B x Total Coliform with Chlorine SM 9221B x Endothall In-house Method(2445) x x Present Enterococci SM 9230B x x Total Coliform/E.coli(P/A SM 9223 x x and Enumeration) Fecal Coliform SM 9221 E(MTF/EC) x TOC SM 5310C x x x Fecal Coliform SM 9221C,E(MTF/EC) x TOX SM 5320B x Fecal Coliform SM 9221E(MTF/EC) x x Total Phenols EPA 420.1 x (Enumeration) Fecal Coliform with SM 9221E x Total Phenols EPA 420.4 x x x Chlorine Present Fecal Streptococci SM 9230B x x Total Phosphorous SM 4500 P E x Fluoride SM 4500-F C x x x Triazine Pesticides& In House(3617) x x Degradates Glyphosate EPA 547 x x Turbidity EPA 180.1 x x x Gl hosate+AMPA In House Method(3618) x x Turbidity SM 2130B x x Gross Alpha/Beta EPA 900.0 x x x Uranium by ICP/MS EPA 200.8 x x Gross Alpha Coprecipitation SM 7110 C x x x 11V 254 SM 5910B x Hardness SM 2340B x x x VOC EPA 524.2 x x Heterotrophic Bacteria In House Method(2439) x x VOC In House Method(2411) x x Heterotrophic Bacteria SM 9215 B x x Yeast and Mold SM 9610 x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.6 x x x Field Sampling N/A 750 Royal Oaks Dr.,Ste 100,Monrovia,CA 91016 Tel(626)386-1100 Fax(866)988-3757 https://www.eurofinsus.com/Eaton Version 006 issued:05/04/20 Page 3 of 18 pages eurofins Eaton Analytical Acknowledgement of Samples Received Addr: City of Meridian Client ID: MERIDIAN-ID 2235 NW 8th Street Folder#: 941320 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Project: SPECIAL Sample Group: Pilot Study Attn: Jason Smith Project Manager: Vanessa Berry Phone: 208-519-0003 Phone: 503-310-3905 The following samples were received from you on June 16,2021 at 1314. They have been scheduled for the tests listed below each sample. If this information is incorrect, please contact your service representative. Thank you for using Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC. Sample# Sample ID Sample Date 202106170080 Well 24 RAW 06/12/2021 0900 ............................................................................................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ....................................................................................... 202106170081 Well 24 F1 06/12/2021 0900 ...................................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP .................................................................................... 202106170082 Well 24 F2 06/12/2021 0900 ........ ............................................................................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP 202106170083 Well 24 F1 06/12/2021 1200 .......................................................................... ............. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP -: .................................................................................... ....................• 202106170084 Well 24 06/12/20 ....................................................................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP 202106170085 Well 24 F1 & 06/12/2021 1500 ............................................................................................... ............... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ........................................................................................................................... 202106170086 Well 24 F2 06/12/2021 1500 ................................................................. ................................ Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............................................................. ...........• 202106170087 Well 24 F1 06/13/2021 0845 ........................................................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ................................................................................................................ 202106170088 Well 24 F2 06/13/2021 0845 .................................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ....................................................................................... ............ 202106170089 Well 24 F1 06/13/2021 1200 ..................................................................................................... .................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............................................................................................... 202106170090 Well 24 F2 06/13/2021 1200 .................................................................................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ................................................................................... 202106170091 Well 24 F 06/13/2021 1500 ........................................................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............................................................................ 202106170092 Well 24 F2 06/13/2021 1500 ............................................................................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ................................................................................................... Reported: 06/28/2021 Page 1 of 2 750 Royal Oaks Drive,Suite 100,Monrovia,CA 91016 Tel(626)386-1100 Fax(866)988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton Page 4 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Acknowledgement of Samples Received Addr: City of Meridian Client ID: MERIDIAN-ID 2235 NW 8th Street Folder#: 941320 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Project: SPECIAL Sample Group: Pilot Study Attn: Jason Smith Project Manager: Vanessa Berry Phone: 208-519-0003 Phone: 503-310-3905 The following samples were received from you on June 16,2021 at 1314. They have been scheduled for the tests listed below each sample. If this information is incorrect, please contact your service representative. Thank you for using Eurofins Eaton Analytical, LLC. Sample# Sample ID Sample Date 202106170093 Well 24 F1 06/14/2021 0800 Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP 202106170094 Well 24 F2 06/14/2021 0800 ........................... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............• 202106170095 Well 24 RAW 06/14/2021 1100 ................. Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP 202106170096 Well 24 F1 06/14/2021 1100 .......................................................... ............ Ammonia Nitrogen Manganese Total ICAP ................................................................................. ....................• 202106170097 Well 24 F2 06/14/202 ................................................................................................................ Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP ............... ................. .......... ..............• 202106170098 Well 24 F1 06/14/2021 1400 ........... Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP 202106170099 Well 24 F2 06/14/2021 1400 Ammonia Nitrogen Iron Total ICAP Manganese Total ICAP Test Description Reported: 06/28/2021 Page 2 of 2 750 Royal Oaks Drive,Suite 100, Monrovia,CA 91016 Tel(626)386-1100 Fax(866)988-3757 www.EurofinsUS.com/Eaton Page 5 of 18 pages Q N w LL ac �' CL q inW r N a�i Z o OI J U � as C a CLU U U 1 U} 0 T 0 Q d C9 o W v ° Cq 0 Qa J s m _ ti 3 a w m O m m ZO Q w -a v V Z P: ~ N J ai°i O n 0 ❑ 0 II II U > W J Z Z ti7 v~j C7 p c c Q O aci rn Z C7 V � � c J Z F rn — N aU `2 0oX W ❑ J t3 7. D Z w O J O N to Q N U tl V Q U ! c O w ❑ J Z N �/ 1` a m a Q E a tu M O J a li Q i Uci `wn c lUU Z zdm � W kN q? E U (E d J O W II II E V P Lii U. p W N w o _ Z Z Y W II II O a O n O d J m u Y CL H J rWn i LL N vivo o131j w a z Q 2 r tl z O u u 1Vt1 O131j 0 F cn s 7 =1U N 3 C UQ A T Z {�l \ N Xl?iivw f G C IL �y IL LU > U a ((�Or (6 � a ►� M ❑ E z W oo v U- r2 u V `O C VM W O F- U) U F" m V ' OJ.LU W II Q z Z w c a W W O 23 LL u U- a 0 q Q w ¢ V 7 b p g v Wd a m V IL LO w J U)p® 76 i _V c yr U C C '� 3 rJ V77 C� _ w Q O U o W m C,4 U {� �L lL iL- �L f/j CD C 4� C Q ul o �O CDo o q J !� rr a oCD LY En m Q c+) CD ca O �r p 1 r3 � a. a L 7+•� cD CA CD Y 4 4 Z �f in 3WIl 3 w } O N CND '� O Z 1i.1 3ldWtl5 f`1 �J ,�! m O � mp N o c o ii o U ¢ m w > ? o toa. LL a�0 m F 3ivcl fA a z w z w LLO f O ¢ 3ldWtl5 ¢ w w uuii LU w F- + En !r cc CJ Page 6 of 18 pages a N ) E -0 1 -le EL LL c) z `o z OI L NZI a m a. W o m g ci U W CDLn N T n a w (n O a� a ` J x to � U `T m m CL Q a w v L U I I f iV z � J V �, O o , a w J II II V O O o a Z z _ v o a) CDZ O U LL c J Z Q O Q p L r2 0 N 0 a LU r V U O O E ❑ mo 0. o — v � zo W �_ O -j (0co�[ O e O w U � o U a L.) ro Z LL m ❑ LLJz r o w Q E U y ° ° F > W � w U ro °� u a ro O J 90 ro O Q r cu w cu c ro z 3 U Q U U o ro w _ ❑ (n a W c/} w N J O w lE II f U U Q 0. 0 a 0 V o L�j w 1 a ..U J � N 41 O wO U N C O �Z — z � � Y TO 0 a j a. w Ja. 3 o ❑ v = z LA y O E i rJ E ti a r� jy , o 0 0 N a H LL '� p Z " U * � � tl1V0 0l3ij � uj � ZO I[ II Q 7 LU O ( E U U ,o .1 Tf V1tla f7731d N � m 0 `v c Lm cnnn w N N XEtl17W ` Ll. l L v �J l ti 1_ LL ~ j v J m o J ��\\ T Z CI} U N c .. lV N JJ Z L a N LL �{ w0 7 m ._ Z w IY O 0 1� O w Q w c d O ,$ m as CLi O O U W 3 U r co 0 ~ O rn V F- w J Z II O Z o ELu LL O I J LL II a 0 " a a � v v LL r 76 m m T U C N 5 fG 20 Q O \j 0 U D w I" ` w C Q -S �' n II v' N 00 LLJ r U `1 0 U W Q }- EZ O l� m m m r� ul 0 U 8 CD a H 3w11 r] LU o f a�awvs l Q` a - o w 0 0 o c o ie o v m ~ o w o lt7 L (� O m Q F 31tlU a 0. Z U V LL I- 2 a- LL m o w a �ldwvs cw w Vi i o f o w s— Page 7 of 18 pages & > J 5 § § § % \ _ co cu± § ] § 7 � § \ / / cu L) § \ }\ a Lu co F 2 < 3: d %\ / RBA 22j/ � § 6 &g & = ° 0 / $ moN \& 3 0 % m 0 \ � _� \ ■ • m U) k \ t ± C \ k g § ) o o _[ _ 2 2 rz�u � - Cl) § — 2 0 <� k o k / 2 \ e §�0 / _ @7 =o \ e / O o k = § 2 I � §000 {k ' - o a c w�a o te= ®f zz 0 # / u � �=eE z Eim@ §§ ( ® � e @ - @ 4tP -Z2 § \ \ \ ■ k 2k0k ffAk k EL E 0 � > / o u § 22 � � U)0&2 J§ E / k k 2 \C 0 \ $ t G \ t CL A t / E CD 0 \ \ = J - S k § 2 E 0 CN Cl) _ ■ )k �C) � m22 f$ 2 = ,Zzi ma§/ ) ifs a).6k oi = to \ / 8@\ /� § //\k 2E \ M %*k o w cli oo § o ~®a g ;� 2 0 CV § �(D e / &j7 ( \§COD � ` k/ƒ § a3cD 0) fa§ fib® # \ � §\� \ � � k $ ! 2 � /k )C * 2 §/ . c< E . e E E �o f e o o o G o J / � N@o �o Page a948pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Comments Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941320 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Flags Legend: M2-Matrix spike recovery was low;the associated blank spike recovery was acceptable. R4-MS/MSD RPD exceeded the method acceptance limit. Recovery met acceptance criteria. The Comments Report may be blank if there are no comments for this report. Page 9 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Hits Report: 941320 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 06/16/2021 1314 2235 NW 8th Street Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Analyzed Analyte Sample ID Result Federal MCL Units MRL 202106170080 Well 24 RAW 06/21/2021 13:25 Iron Total ICAP 0.017 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:25 Manganese Total ICAP 0.040 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 202106170095 Well 24 RAW 06/21/2021 13:34 Iron Total ICAP 0.010 0.3 mg/L 0.010 06/21/2021 13:34 Manganese Total ICAP 0.037 0.05 mg/L 0.0020 SUMMARY OF POSITIVE DATA ONLY Page 10 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941320 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1314 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Well 24 RAW(202106170080) Sampled on 06/12/2021 0900 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:25 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.017 mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:25 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.040 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:31 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170081) Sampled on 06/12/2021 0900 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:26 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:26 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:00 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170082) Sampled on 06/12/2021 0900 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:27 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:27 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:01 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170083) Sampled on 06/12/2021 1200 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:32 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:32 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:04 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170084) Sampled on 06/12/2021 1200 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:33 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:33 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:32 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170085) Sampled on 06/12/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:34 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 11 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941320 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1314 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:34 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:33 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170086) Sampled on 06/12/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:13 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:13 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:05 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170087) Sampled on 06/13/2021 0845 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:16 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:16 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:07 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170088) Sampled on 06/13/2021 0845 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:19 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:19 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:34 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170089) Sampled on 06/13/2021 1200 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:20 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:20 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:40 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND(M2,R4) mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170090) Sampled on 06/13/2021 1200 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:21 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:21 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:08 1337104 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170091) Sampled on 06/13/2021 1500 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 12 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941320 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1314 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:22 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:22 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:43 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170092) Sampled on 06/13/2021 1500 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:23 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:23 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:45 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170093) Sampled on 06/14/2021 0800 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:24 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:24 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:46 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170094) Sampled on 06/14/2021 0800 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:35 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:35 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:47 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 RAW(202106170095) Sampled on 06/14/2021 1100 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:34 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP 0.010 mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:34 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP 0.037 mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:21 1337107 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170096) Sampled on 06/14/2021 1100 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:36 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:36 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 13 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Tel:(626)386-1100 Report: 941320 Fax:(866)988-3757 Project: SPECIAL 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) Group: Pilot Study City of Meridian Samples Received on: Jason Smith 2235 NW 8th Street 06/16/2021 1314 Meridian, ID 83642-2300 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 14:24 1337107 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170097) Sampled on 06/14/2021 1100 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:37 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:37 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:48 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F1 (202106170098) Sampled on 06/14/2021 1400 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:38 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:38 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:52 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Well 24 F2(202106170099) Sampled on 06/14/2021 1400 EPA 200.7-ICP Metals 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:39 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Iron Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.010 1 06/17/21 06/21/21 13:39 1335663 1336110 (EPA 200.7) Manganese Total ICAP ND mg/L 0.0020 1 EPA 350.1 -Ammonia Nitrogen 06/24/21 12:53 1337362 (EPA 350.1) Ammonia Nitrogen ND mg/L 0.050 1 Rounding on totals after summation. (c)-indicates calculated results. Analysis is a calculated result.Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting. Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses. Page 14 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Summary Report: 941320 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian ICP Metals Prep Batch: 1335663 Analytical Batch: 1336110 Analysis Date: 06/21/2021 202106170080 Well 24 RAW Analyzed by: NINA 202106170081 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170082 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170083 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170084 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170085 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170086 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170087 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170088 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170089 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170090 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170091 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170092 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170093 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170094 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170095 Well 24 RAW Analyzed by: NINA 202106170096 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170097 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170098 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: NINA 202106170099 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: NINA Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Batch: 1337104 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 202106170081 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170082 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170083 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170086 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170087 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170090 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Batch: 1337107 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 202106170095 Well 24 RAW Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170096 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 Ammonia Nitrogen Analytical Batch: 1337362 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 202106170080 Well 24 RAW Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170084 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170085 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170088 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170089 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170091 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170092 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170093 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 Page 15 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Summary Report: 941320 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian 202106170094 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170097 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170098 Well 24 F1 Analyzed by: MIA8 202106170099 Well 24 F2 Analyzed by: MIA8 Page 16 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 941320 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%o) Limits(%) Limit(%) RPD% ICP Metals by EPA 200.7 Analytical Batch: 1336110 Analysis Date: 06/21/2021 LCS1 Iron Total ICAP 5 5.18 mg/L 104 (85-115) LCS2 Iron Total ICAP 5 5.19 mg/L 104 (85-115) 20 0.19 MBLK Iron Total ICAP <0.004850 mg/L MRL_CHK Iron Total ICAP 0.01 0.0105 mg/L 105 (50-150) MS_202106170086 Iron Total ICAP ND 5 5.17 mg/L 103 (70-130) MS2_202106170082 Iron Total ICAP ND 5 5.15 mg/L 103 (70-130) MSD_202106170086 Iron Total ICAP ND 5 5.22 mg/L 104 (70-130) 20 1 MSD2_202106170082 Iron Total ICAP ND 5 5.18 mg/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.49 LCS1 Manganese Total ICAP 2 2.06 mg/L 103 (85-115) LCS2 Manganese Total ICAP 2 2.06 mg/L 103 (85-115) 20 0.0 MBLK Manganese Total ICAP <0.000700 mg/L MRL_CHK Manganese Total ICAP 0.002 0.00219 mg/L 110 (50-150) MS_202106170086 Manganese Total ICAP ND 2 2.05 mg/L 102 (70-130) MS2_202106170082 Manganese Total ICAP ND 2 2.04 mg/L 102 (70-130) MSD_202106170086 Manganese Total ICAP ND 2 2.07 mg/L 104 (70-130) 20 1.0 MSD2_202106170082 Manganese Total ICAP ND 2 2.06 mg/L 103 (70-130) 20 1.1 Ammonia Nitrogen by EPA 350.1 Analytical Batch: 1337104 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 LCS3 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 0.992 mg/L 99 (90-110) LCS4 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 1.01 mg/L 101 (90-110) 20 1.8 MBLK Ammonia Nitrogen <0.00674 mg/L MRL_CHK Ammonia Nitrogen 0.05 0.0530 mg/L 106 (79-126) MS1_202106170581 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.061 1 1.15 mg/L 109 (90-110) MS1_202106170591 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.682 mg/L 68 (90-110) MSD1_202106170581 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.061 1 1.13 mg/L 107 (90-110) 20 1.8 MSD1_202106170591 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.736 mg/L 73 (90-110) 20 7.6 Ammonia Nitrogen by EPA 350.1 Analytical Batch: 1337107 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 LCS3 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 0.990 mg/L 99 (90-110) LCS4 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 1.02 mg/L 102 (90-110) 20 3.0 MBLK Ammonia Nitrogen <0.00674 mg/L MRL_CHK Ammonia Nitrogen 0.05 0.0500 mg/L 100 (79-126) MS1_202106170095 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 1.10 mg/L 107 (90-110) MS1_202106170776 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.83 1 2.04 mg/L 121 (90-110) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only,batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only,unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL(Minimum Reporting Level). (S)-Indicates surrogate compound. (1)-Indicates internal standard compound. Page 17 of 18 pages tiff eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 941320 Tel:(626)386-1100 Project: SPECIAL Fax:(866)988-3757 Group: Pilot Study 1 800 566 LABS(1 800 566 5227) City of Meridian RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%o) Limits(%) Limit(%) RPD% MSD1_202106170095 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 1.02 mg/L 100 (90-110) 20 7.5 MSD1_202106170776 Ammonia Nitrogen 0.83 1 2.02 mg/L 119 (90-110) 20 0.74 Ammonia Nitrogen by EPA 350.1 Analytical Batch: 1337362 Analysis Date: 06/24/2021 LCS3 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 0.981 mg/L 98 (90-110) LCS4 Ammonia Nitrogen 1 0.993 mg/L 99 (90-110) 20 1.2 MBLK Ammonia Nitrogen <0.00674 mg/L MRL_CHK Ammonia Nitrogen 0.05 0.0510 mg/L 102 (79-126) MS1_202106170089 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.834 mg/L 82 (90-110) MS1_202106170100 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 1.02 mg/L 102 (90-110) MSD1_202106170089 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.584 mg/L 57 (90-110) 20 35 MSD1_202106170100 Ammonia Nitrogen ND 1 0.716 mg/L 71 (90-110) 20 35 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only,batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only,unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL(Minimum Reporting Level). (S)-Indicates surrogate compound. (1)-Indicates internal standard compound. Page 18 of 18 pages LLIPREST Page 66 APPENDIX B Pilot Test Daily Operations Log Page 66 -72 Loprest, a division of WRT 901 W. 116t'Avenue, Ste 400,Westminster, CO 80234 • 303 424-5355 3 3 Iu a AO u 2 3 o n � E A Qilk d a — a 1� ® u �► a a o n E E `e Q a ; —$. !,� M Q 67 � N o ,gf4 �s a o ci O -D OILm E a o p � o a .19 a F pia qi d� 9� .g o 5 a ; � - � pop a E O LD p Iz _ N fY 2 cv __' E 0 0� " �" e a �n � �� ��, ►n fn 1n "n N ry N rI M _ oaa rcv,u' i cv d 4� 9a� a U vE Z E a a E L a s qa ag 4 d' r$» M M N ^! $5o e � •�y/yy�, Qf� 40 o Q o s o n m m E C{ M M it 8 � � s a E LLaS �' E E # _ E rN M M M M42 P — a Z � � i 0 � P Ei rn � 1n 4+ a a A U3 rc � m S 9 9 sit oa E m gg & g Q O Q u rl- E ri g rt tv rt IZ` M ni imp a a 5C SS o 0 0 4 =0 s E g a 4 9 E €0 4 l f o s E u — _ - _ — M a a r E o a" &8' N J io a„ \1 co m �.E �I�' T O m s _ s it IV C47 dJ e !0` N N N N N N w a d rc is 6 s ^� s Iq M r� n8 to ,s M 0 0 o 0 0 0 �� LL �LLLL�a LL a � � s e LLa £ € F c E r co a O p 0p D O z z'�m B e � W �� �n � � �P P f ,,�' L• y M Q n '� a4' a�= 0l4 O�O o�D 3 - ® Q p 0 ® o 0 0 m I g al = E e P4 00 g o m m LL P` c's E E r r s ,1 r? N N 3 3 a r1 T !� — � E _ H �g LL o O O O O O O 6 C- $g O O o $ a ® Q O P CL° O O O O �9 b m It LL LL LL § i $ E 4 9 E O o ® o 0 €Vo E 1N N V, ° c E M I N g a rt r- 1p k.n J J 1 \A - E o:�o E Vp c m o a E _ m CT 0 Q aWo '/ 04 --- e 5�i rf1 s � e o 0 0 g s' wo IL T 2 W W W LL S E rlo A NMip � E O E J Ja n S g eia Z NU APPENDIX B-CITY OF MERIDIAN DESIGN CHECKLIST This page intentionally blank. June 2024 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST - DESIGN 4/20/23 STATUS EXTERIOR CONSIDERATIONS Decide on Location/Orientation of building on well lot Architectural Checklist for CZC Type and Size of Pump— Determined by pump testing/design process ❑ Well outside of pumphouse to enable maintenance (design for freeze protection and consider motor temp issues, noise attenuation Exterior Finish - Coordinate with stakeholders ❑ HOA/Architectural Committee ❑ Developer ❑ Lease Agreement ❑ Water Division Roof Type ❑ Standing Metal Seam (preferred) ❑ Eaves/soffit: Hardie Board only ❑ HOA/Architectural Committee Paving Type — 1/2" max aggregate in asphalt/permeable paver mix Storm Drainage ❑ Permeable surface avers referred Building Signage/Addressing Gate Information Signage CITY MERIDIAN WELL #28 ❑ 30"x24„ EP©5 028 ❑ White Background 2658 E. TACONIC DRIVE ❑ Blue Lettering MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM El Blue Meridian Logo PwsIt 1 g DWR#D0053548 l03NON01 E3232SESWNE ❑ Signs Etc. — Meridian ID FOR EMERGENCY CALL Gate Warning Signs 208-888-5242 `�E ❑ Chemical NFPA Chlorine placard ❑ Chemical NFPA Diesel placard, blue-0, red-2, yellow-0, white-no special condition Fence Signage ❑ Gates or driveways to include "No Parking" sign. Signage-White background with red letters. ❑ "Keep Out" / "Tampering with this facility is a Federal Offense" Building Signage ❑ "High Voltage" ❑ Chemical NFPA Chlorine placard ❑ Chemical NFPA Diesel placard, blue-0, red-2, yellow-0, white-no special condition ❑ "Hearing protection" Landscape — ❑ Comply with lease agreement/HOA rules ❑ Keep irrigated landscape outside of fenced area ❑ Discuss tree requirements with Arborist ❑ Low maintenance vegetation ❑ Rubber mulch Irrigation System ❑ Control boxes to be located outside of fencing (on the fence) ❑ Valve boxes/backflow prevention/filter to be located outside of fencing ❑ Irrigation provided by HOA PI system Page 1 of 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST - DESIGN STATUS EXTERIOR CONSIDERATIONS continued Site Layout ❑ Route fiber conduit from building interior to junction box at property line. ❑ Must be able to pull off road to open gate ❑ Chemical delivery direct to tank. Two-inch exterior fill hookup with cam-lock fitting, check valve, and drain. Need to see while filling (door, window, indicator). ❑ Plan spacing for chlorine truck delivery and for pipe layout when pulling/installing the pump ❑ Ultimate buildout (filter building or blending well) ❑ Determine sewer system connection point. If treatment is envisioned get maximum allowable sewer flow from WW Engineering. ❑ Review 1" water service location with PM ❑ Locate water system connection to maximize contact time before first customer ❑ Determine future replacement well location on site. Flush Line Location/Connection ❑ Pressure to gravity inside fence ❑ Air gap with Screen at discharge manhole, example Well 17 treatment. Discharge locations must be fully enclosed with 24 mesh screen ❑ If site conditions allow, provide automatic flush-to-waste with control PLC. This allows well to flush to waste after periods of non-use. ❑ Pressure relief flushes to same box as flush Backwash line location/connection (for filter facilities) ❑ Keep minimum 4' separation from building ❑ Air gap with 24 mesh screen at discharge manhole, example Well 27 treatment. Discharge locations must be fully enclosed with 24 mesh screen ❑ Air/vac vents (separate pipe for each cell) drain to flush box (Install unions in piping) ❑ Prevent freezing of ends of air/vac lines outside building ❑ Keep pipes inside as much as possible. When pipe must be outside use stainless steel piping with screw on mesh caps HVAC —No heat pumps ❑ Redundant heating (provide conduit/stubs for future gas connection) Fence Type — 8ft Classic 3 rail black aluminum (i.e. Montage II or equivalent) Gate Type—Vehicle and Man gates to swing both ways with hinges and lock/clasp welded not bolted. Vehicle gate to be two (2), 10-foot-wide panels. Door locks — ❑ Construction cores from Minutemen Lock & Security (paid for by contractor). ❑ Medeco CLIQ Connect Smart Key locks and padlocks from Minuteman Lock & Security required at final completion. Required for all lockable doors, panels, gates, monitoring wells, etc. Knox Box — Mounted on exterior fence Page 2 of 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST - DESIGN STATUS EXTERIOR CONSIDERATIONS continued Card Reader System — RfID badge readers (RDR-805W1AKB-P) shall be installed inside each access door to the building (coordinate with City if excessive) for someone to swipe their badge as they enter the building. This is not connected to door locks, etc. There should also be a badge reader installed in the door of the HMI Panel. The readers should be configured with their own IP addresses, and connected via CAT6 Ethernet cable to a POE port on a dedicated Ethernet switch. The dedicated POE switch should also be connected to the Ethernet switch inside the Well PLC LCP. STATUS INTERIOR CONSIDERATIONS Generator— Permanent (if possible) ❑ All transfer switches to be automatic ❑ Capable of sending the following analog output to SCADA: 1) Oil temp (degrees F) 2) Oil pressure 3) Cooling system level 4) Cooling system temp (degrees F) 5) Fuel level (gallons) 6) Battery voltage (dc) 7) Battery charge current (Amps) 8) Volts Phase A 9) Volts Phase B 10) Volts Phase C 11) Average Voltage 12) Current Phase A 13) Current Phase B 14) Current Phase C 15) Average current 16) Generator Frequency 17) Utility Power Voltage Present (Y/N). Discreet point 18) Generator Power Present (Y/N). Discreet point 19) Total power KW 20) Engine Rpm 21) Engine hours ❑ If site has no permanent generator then provide a connection box with male camlock connections series 16. Idaho Power— Power meter mounted to transformer ❑ Building with portable generator require to be counter-clockwise rotation at the transformer Transformer— Coordinate with Idaho Power for location and size ❑ Determine available fault current for design use Separate electrical and blower rooms preferred Separate chemical room required Eyewash Station with Shower—Well water satisfies "tepid" temp requirement ❑ Provide non-slip grating for eyewash station Building doors to have a hold-open mechanism on `door closer' Paint Colors ❑ Walls/Ceiling — SW7006 Extra White (Sherwin Williams) ❑ Pipes —Antique White: SW6119 (Sherwin Williams) Page 3 of 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST - DESIGN STATUS INTERIOR CONSIDERATIONS continued Paint Colors ❑ Exterior Exposed Piping (flush line): To be selected when picking exterior building colors (Suggestion: Grizzle Gray SW7068) ❑ Floor— Company; Key Resin West o Key 535 o Key 803 Chiplock 0 450 Topcoat o Color: Apache Tan ❑ Doors/Frames — Grey or match existing Asset Management ❑ Assets identified on plans (by asset tag) ❑ Master sheet with table that has all assets with page locations and Asset Management Standard Notes ❑ Asset Management team to install asset labels ❑ Include asset item disposition table ❑ Contractor to provide estimated asset costs (only for tagged assets Floor Drain Type - Trench Drain Fire Prevention ❑ Fire Sprinkler- MUST meet Fire Department requirements ❑ Fire Riser Room Heater- MUST meet Fire Department requirements ❑ Room temperature to SCADA ❑ Consider alternate fireproofing to avoid fire sprinklers, particularly in electrical room Fire Alarm - It is the City's intent that the fire alarm wiring and device be labeled in the same manner as to what is laid out in the electrical specifications. Design consultant to develop fire alarm specs accordingly. Chlorine Tank— ❑ Single wall inside a catch basin, example well 17. Openings only at top, no penetrations allowed in the wall of the tank. ❑ Secondary Containment to be outside manhole. Drain under chlorine injector drains to secondary containment also. ❑ Contractor to power wash the whole chlorine tank after making pipe penetrations Filter Tank- ❑ Underdrain style. Must be able to inspect underdrain from lower hatches. ❑ Rust free- coating spec/ inspection- holiday testing. ❑ Longer legs (36") instead of concrete pedestals ❑ Face piping design to put valves at 60" or less on both sides. No face piping below finished floor if possible. ❑ Effluent meters on each cell ❑ Pressure cooker style hatches on top. Bolted flange style on bottom. Install air/vac line on each upper tank access hatch on flange area. ❑ Supplier to provide finish painted tank. Antique white epoxy -SW 6119. ❑ No direct tapping on face piping-use saddles. ❑ All connection piping to be brass or stainless ❑ Face piping-cement mortar lined ductile Page 4 of 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST - DESIGN STATUS INTERIOR CONSIDERATIONS continued Chlorine Pump — Non-Treatment projects: Grundfos Smart Digital DDA 0-4.5GPH, Treatment projects: LMI EXCEL XR 16 gph 150 psi Chlorine Analyzer ❑ Type: o Concentrations higher than 0.05 mg/I manganese or 0.3 mg/I Iron use CL1OF or Rosemount FCL Chlorine Analyzer o If concentrations are lower than 0.05 mg/I manganese or 0.3 mg/I Iron use CL17SC ❑ Meter and mount for MXUs on wall ❑ Drain to sewer not seepage bed Chlorine Gas Detector ❑ Type: Sensidyne ❑ Go/No go lights for gas detection ❑ Test station (located in PLC) ❑ Provide appropriate si na e per spec METERS ❑ Meters on: o Well discharge (influent to filter) o Filter flow (one per cell) o Total effluent flow o Filter to waste o Backwash ❑ MAG Meter type — McCrometer with AMI output PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS ❑ On both influent and effluent sides of filter ❑ Endress Hauser Ceraphant PTC 31B -1-600 psi ❑ To be on own tap. No sample faucet. WELL HEAD PIPING ❑ Install sample tap upstream of the check valve STATUS PROJECT COMMUNICATIONS DEQ Preliminary Engineering Report Approval — Engineers draft and submit Use New Source Checklist? YES / NO STATUS ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS Reference Meridian Electrical Standards Specifications and Standard Drawings February 2023 ARC flash Study and Labeling ❑ Arc flash study and labeling to be provided by DC Engineering, paid for by the City, and coordinated by the contractor ❑ Refer to guidelines Power System Study Scope of Work found in Engineering Checklist on the Intranet Confirm panel ratings conform to ARC flash requirements ❑ Identify and provide proper means to mitigate arc flash PPE levels to 8 Cal or less on ALL Electrical equipment with the exception of the main breaker. This is to be done before any equipment is purchased. HMI/PLC—Allen Bradley w/ Compact Logix. For more complex projects check with SCADA Administrator. Page 5 of 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST — DESIGN STATUS ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS continued SCADA ❑ Cellular Switch provided by IT ❑ Surge protection shunt ❑ Condition monitoring (flow, speed, temp, vibration, etc.) ❑ Install RTD input card in the PLC ❑ Power monitoring (line and load) ❑ LCP to be sized for future expansion Vertical Turbine Well Motor/VFD ❑ Ceramic coated races for bearings-top / Bushings-bottom ❑ Grounding straps for motor ❑ Ethernet enabled VFD's (Allen Bradley) dv/dt filters after VFD for all submersible motors ❑ The VFD chassis fans need to be temp controlled via t-stat set to 90 degrees. ❑ Motor temperature sensors mounted internally. Use stator winding RTD (resistance temperature detectors- 2 per phase) installed at factory or during a rewind. Platinum only. This means 6 new I/Os for the PLC to track. VFD Door Mounted Requirements ❑ 24V PLC Input ❑ HIM module ❑ HOA switch ❑ Hour meter for motor ❑ RUN/FAULT/Power ON ( ALL LED push to test type ) Emergency wall mounted egress lights not to exceed 8 ft above finished floor. Homac flood seal or approved equal on all in-ground splices All analog devices servicing the pump or monitoring well to terminate in a hinged covered junction box on DIN rail mounted terminals Examples include: pressure transducers, down-well transducers, flow meter, vibration, temp, rpm, chlorine analyzers, chlorine pumps, conditional based monitoring equipment etc. For monitoring wells: ❑ 120V service to monitoring wells to be installed in separate conduit ❑ Provide GFI power outlet at monitoring well ❑ Provide heater with thermostat, indicator light, at well, if above- ground artesian zones exist ❑ Provide separate 2" conduit for down-hole transducers ❑ Transducers installed at 100 ft unless monitoring wells levels are lower. Make/model to be Keller Microlevel submersible level transmitter 0-50 psi. ❑ Transducers to be PSIA transducers (non-vented) with a barometric sensor up top for SCADA use. ❑ Conduit to terminate in a hinged covered junction box on DIN rail mounted terminals STATUS ELECTRICAL STANDARDS Contractor to utilize proper terminal block labels on all PLC modules and label all wires entering and leaving the control panel. This is to be extended to all field wiring and should include all Ethernet, analog, branch circuits etc. Page 6 of 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST - DESIGN STATUS ELECTRICAL STANDARDS continued Labeling everything electrical is very important....every wire needs to be labeled; every panel, junction box, conduit, etc. is to be labeled. Spare fuses (100%) for all vendor panels and disconnects Fuse cabinet installed in electrical room, labeled "Fuse Cabinet" Occupancy sensors for lighting control (every room) One photocell for full control of all exterior lights mounted on North facing wall accessible with an 8' ladder. An HOA lighting contactor is to be located in the electrical room for exterior lighting. Filter PLC panels are to utilize same material specs as Well PLC panels. All indicator lights to be LED push to test including vendor supplied panels. Include blower starter panels, exhaust fan starter, go/no go stations, all vender provided equipment. LED lighting for all internal and external lighting. Utilize lumark XTOR fixtures for external lights Power monitoring of both motor and building service with Ethernet communications back to PLC incorporated into MCC. Needs to be wired to the individual phase legs right after the main circuit breaker. (Allen Bradley type) Power monitoring of 120/208V house panel via KELE#460 for phase loss protection wired back to PLC for alarming. Install UPS status alarming and door mount UPS in control panel. UPS to be Toshiba 1000 and this should extend to any filter PLC UPS as well. UPS bypass switch by C and C Power or approved equal. Main service Breaker to be mounted to exterior of building and utilize ARMS unit (Arc reduction maintenance switch). All sites are to have ALL conduits concealed in walls and under slab. Provide antenna cabling conduit from PLC enclosure to closest exterior wall. Provide 1" conduit to terminate in a 2 gang box. All underground conduits to utilize PVC coated rigid elbows and all stubs ups through slab to be PVC coated rigid. Provide runtime hour meters on VFDs and blower starter where applicable. Separate electrical room/area. Removable roof hatch over the VFD location or taller doorways for removal / installation of the VFD (Verify all doorways will accommodate VFD). Slope exterior access to electrical room for installation of equipment. Page 7 of 8 CITY OF MERIDIAN PUBLIC WORKS WATER FACILITIES CHECKLIST - DESIGN STATUS COMMISSIONING CHECKLIST ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN DESIGN/SPEC FOR ALL FACITLITIES - 1/0 functionality test (Design engineer to develop list and supplier/contractor to complete) - Chemical and fire alarms function test - Backflow certification - Verify chlorine pump is flow pacing correctly and looking for VFD signal to run. - Verify Chlorine pump turns off at low level. - All alarms are functioning properly including communicating through SCADA. Work with SCADA System Administrator to define alarm list / labeling / nomenclature. - Verify rotation of all pumps and motors - Control System Integrator to provide an 10 Checkout form with the following information at a minimum: Data Type, Slot, Point, Description, Pass/Fail, Range, and Tag Name and shall provide completed form as a deliverable for project completion. FOR PUMPING FACILITIES - Test high pressure shutoff - Set pressure (setting provided by City) and test pressure relief - Run VFD manually and under pressure control FOR TREATMENT FACILITIES - 1/0 functionality test including confirmation that valve position feedback is correct (Design engineer to develop list and supplier/contractor to complete) - No leaks (hatches) - Run filter manually and in auto through all cycles for all cells without errors or faults. Complete prior to filter equipment rep leaving site. - Run through simulated high headloss backwash event - Manually place valve in opposite of correct position and put filter in auto to see what it does (stop and alarm is the correct answer) - Test high level alarms in the backwash vaults Contractor to coordinate with PM to set up wastewater inspection of sewer flows during full backwash FOR FACILITIES WITH BACKUP POWER GENERATION - Conduct load bank testing according to (industry standards) - Run facility on generator continuously for 24 hours or at least the duration of the fuel tank Page 8 of 8 6TONKAWATER" a Kurita brand Meridian, ID Well 24 Water Treatment Filter RFP #PW-2425-11083.d Proposal August 8, 2024 v...v URITA 6TONKAWATERTI a Kurita brand Alternates Alternate 1 to include: • DEDUCT: Change filter media to GreensandPlusT"" o GreensandPlusTM filter media with an effective size of 0.30 mm to 0.35 mm and a uniformity coefficient not exceeding 1.60 included to provide a vertical bed depth of 36". GreensandPluslm to be shipped in 50 pound, one-half cubic foot bags for installation by contractors. Skimming of the Greensand Plus shall be performed by the contractor. Approximate total bags: 1,544 (772 ft3). Note that Greensand Plus will have approximately 40% lower backwash rates than pyrolusite. Meridian(Well 24),ID-23141 � KIJR�TA 6 TON KAWATERTI a Kurita brand Sell Price Tonka Water OptaCell Plus"' Horizontal Pressure Filter System See Cost Proposal Form • ' • and Alternate #1 Designs Option 1 to include: • DEDUCT: Provide Greensand Plus media in lieu of pyrolusite 1. Provide Greensand Plus media in lieu of pyrolusite Deduct $58,900.00 We do not include the following: 1. Mechanical or electrical installation. 2. Unloading or rigging. The contractor must provide a suitable access to the jobsite. 3. On-site storage or protection of equipment. 4. Pipe,valves or fittings other than those specifically described herein. 5. Pipe supports or hangers. 6. Motor starters, motor controls, disconnects, or any other electrical equipment other than those specifically described herein. 7. Electrical wiring or conduit. 8. Chemical feed tubing, conduit piping, hangers or supports. 9. Pumps or pumping equipment other than those specifically described herein. 10. Concrete,concrete grout or rebar. 11. Disinfection or disinfection/start-up chemicals. 12. Lubricants. 13. Pneumatic tubing or conduit. 14. Control panel wall mounting material or hardware. 15. Anchor bolts or anchoring calculations, unless specifically described herein. 16. Any items not specifically described in this proposal. Notes: 1. Equipment is quoted f.o.b.factory with full freight allowed to the jobsite. 2. Our proposal does not include any sales or use taxes. 3. If the above proposal includes valves, piping, etc.,these are to be shipped loose for assembly and installation by others unless specifically noted to the contrary. 4. Please note that a copy of the contractor's payment and performance bond is required to be forwarded to us as a part of normal credit approval procedures. 5. Kurita America requires partial payments based on shipped material and purchaser's account being current prior to scheduling a field technician for equipment start-up. 6. Kurita America will provide field services as outlined above in this quotation. Kurita America's field service rate is$1200.00 per day plus travel and per diem expenses. If Kurita America field service personnel arrive on-site after a schedule is established and the project is not ready for the intended services to be performed, Kurita America will invoice for additional days, if required. If the time required is greater than listed in this quotation, Kurita America will invoice purchaser at the above field service rate plus travel and per diem expenses. Meridian(Well 24),ID-23141 � KtiR1TA 6 TO N K AWAT E RT" a Kurita brand Sell Price Tonka Water OptaCell Plus"' Horizontal Pressure Filter System $886,500.00 • ' • and Alternate #1 Designs Option 1 to include: • DEDUCTS: 1. Provide Greensand Plus media in lieu of pyrolusite Deduct-Included in above Provide 8"valves, meters and piping because of media 2. change $25,350.00 We do not include the following: 1. Mechanical or electrical installation. 2. Unloading or rigging. The contractor must provide a suitable access to the jobsite. 3. On-site storage or protection of equipment. 4. Pipe,valves or fittings other than those specifically described herein. 5. Pipe supports or hangers. 6. Motor starters, motor controls, disconnects, or any other electrical equipment other than those specifically described herein. 7. Electrical wiring or conduit. 8. Chemical feed tubing, conduit piping, hangers or supports. 9. Pumps or pumping equipment other than those specifically described herein. 10. Concrete, concrete grout or rebar. 11. Disinfection or disinfection/start-up chemicals. 12. Lubricants. 13. Pneumatic tubing or conduit. 14. Control panel wall mounting material or hardware. 15. Anchor bolts or anchoring calculations, unless specifically described herein. 16. Any items not specifically described in this proposal. Notes: 1. Equipment is quoted f.o.b.factory with full freight allowed to the jobsite. 2. Our proposal does not include any sales or use taxes. 3. If the above proposal includes valves, piping,etc.,these are to be shipped loose for assembly and installation by others unless specifically noted to the contrary. 4. Please note that a copy of the contractor's payment and performance bond is required to be forwarded to us as a part of normal credit approval procedures. 5. Kurita America requires partial payments based on shipped material and purchaser's account being current prior to scheduling a field technician for equipment start-up. 6. Kurita America will provide field services as outlined above in this quotation. Kurita America's field service rate is$1200.00 per day plus travel and per diem expenses. If Kurita America field service personnel arrive on-site after a schedule is established and the project is not ready for the intended services to be performed, Kurita America will invoice for additional days, if required. If the time required is greater than listed in this quotation, Meridian(Well 24),ID-23141R1 � KuR*ITA Attachment B MILESTONE / PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $861,150.00. B. Substantial Completion 480 days from Notice to Proceed. Final Completion 510 days from Notice to Proceed. MILESTONE DATES/PRICING SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1. Well 24 Water Treatment Filter (Equipment) $861,150.00 CONTRACT TOTAL................$861,150.00 0 0 0 U O 0 G! 00 01 Q � � +�+ O .i 0) a� O CJ }' c N O 07 ( v cif Q O _0 0 Q) V Lr v � v � u 40 E a w N i.i a-+ E v ro co v L L Q� fu fu N fV N cu rl O 4t E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Approve award of bid and equipment contract to Advanced Electrical Technologies for the Tertiary Filtration Electrical Package 2 for MCC, PLC's & Comm Panels for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$340,000.00 C� fIEN .D L4,, MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL Request to Include Topic on the City Council Agenda From: Keith Watts Meeting Date: 10/8/2024 Presenter: Consent Estimated Time: N/A Topic: Approve award of bid and equipment contract to Advanced Electrical Technologies for the Tertiary Filtration Electrical Package 2 for MCC, PLC's & Comm Panels for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$340,000.00. Recommended Council Action: Award of Bid and approval of agreement for the Not-To-Exceed amount of$340,000.00 and authorize the Procurement Manager to sign. Background: This is the result of Formal Bid #PW-2426-11281.L. 2 bids were received. AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPLY OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE TERTIARY FILTRATION PROJECT— ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2 — MCC's. PLC's, & COMM PANELS PROJECT# 11281.L. THIS AGREEMENT FOR EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT is made this 1 st day of October, 2024, and entered into by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642, and Advanced Electrical Technologies, hereinafter referred to as "SUPPLIER", whose business address is 720 S. Kit, Caldwell, ID 83605. INTRODUCTION Whereas, the City has a need for 1 MCC, 2 PLC's and 2 Comm Panels as specified in the contract documents; and WHEREAS, the Supplier is specially trained, experienced and competent to provide and has agreed to provide such equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1 . Services, Supplies, Equipment Specifications & Requirements: 1 .1 Supplier shall supply the Switchboards to the City upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of the City's written notice to proceed, all items, and comply in all respects, as specified in the Invitation for Bids titled "TERTIARY FILTRATION PROJECT — ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2" and Suppliers bid dated by which by this reference are incorporated herein, together with all addendums issued. 1 .2 The Supplier shall provide all equipment and services under this Agreement consistent with the requirements and standards established by applicable federal, state and City laws, ordinances, regulations and resolutions and the UCC. The Supplier represents and warrants that it will perform its work in accordance with generally accepted industry standards and practices for the profession or professions that are used in performance of this Agreement and that are in effect at the time of performance of this Agreement. TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's & COMM PANELS page 1 of 10 112811. 2. Consideration 2.1 The Supplier shall be compensated on a Fixed Price basis as provided in Attachment B "Payment Schedule" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof, for the Not-To-Exceed amount of $340,000.00. 2.2 The Supplier shall provide the City with a detailed invoice upon delivery of all services, supplies, equipment or chemicals, which the City will pay within 30 days of receipt of a correct invoice and approval by the City Project Manager. The City will not withhold any Federal or State income taxes or Social Security Tax from any payment made by City to Supplier under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Payment of all taxes and other assessments on such sums is the sole responsibility of Supplier. 2.3 Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Supplier shall not be entitled to receive from the City any additional consideration, compensation, salary, wages, or other type of remuneration for services rendered under this Agreement including, but not limited to, meals, lodging, transportation, drawings, renderings or mockups. Specifically, Supplier shall not be entitled by virtue of this Agreement to consideration in the form of overtime, health insurance benefits, retirement benefits, paid holidays or other paid leaves of absence of any type or kind whatsoever. 3. Invoices Invoices shall be rendered in duplicate and shall include: (1) Purchase Order number; (2) pricing; (3) quantity; (4) description; (5) any sales taxes or use taxes as separate items, giving permit number authorizing collection of use taxes; (6) point of shipment; (7) method and class of shipment; (8) complete routing of shipment; and (9) whether transportation expense has been prepaid. Seller/Contractor/Contractor agrees to make a separate invoice for each order and shipment. Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Purchase Order, all taxes, duties, tolls, fees, import charges, or other governmental exactions shall be deemed included in the purchase price of the supplies and services and the City shall have no liability to pay Seller/Contractor/Contractor or any third party any amount in excess of the specified purchase price. City of Meridian, a local governmental entity of the State of Idaho, is exempt from any Federal Manufacturer's Excise Tax under the provision of Section 4221(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. All invoices shall exclude such excise tax. All invoices shall be sent to the following address: City of Meridian, Accounts Payable, 33. East Broadway Ave., Meridian, Idaho 83642. TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's &COMM PANELS page 2 of 10 112811. 4. Term: 4.1 This agreement shall become effective upon execution by both parties, and shall expire upon on successful startup and commissioning or unless sooner terminated as provided below. 4.2 The City reserves the right to extend the agreement for up to four (4) additional one-year periods if mutually agreeable to both parties. Any and all extensions must be documented in writing and be executed by both parties. Any continuation of this agreement beyond September 30 of any fiscal year is subject to City Council approval. 4.3 Should Supplier default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, City, at City's option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Supplier. 4.4 Should City fail to pay Supplier all or any part of the compensation set forth in Attachment B of this Agreement on the date due, Supplier, at the Supplier's option, may terminate this Agreement if the failure is not remedied by the City within thirty (30) days from the date payment is due. 5. Termination: If, through any cause, Supplier, its officers, employees, or agents fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, falsifies any record or document required to be prepared under this agreement, engages in fraud, dishonesty, or any other act of misconduct in the performance of this contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Supplier of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least fifteen (15)days before the effective date of such termination. Notwithstanding the above, Supplier shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by Supplier, and the City may withhold any payments to Supplier for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from Supplier is determined. This provision shall survive the termination of this agreement and shall not relieve Supplier of its liability to the City for damages. 6. Independent Supplier: 6.1 In all matters pertaining to this agreement, Supplier shall be acting as an independent Supplier, and neither Supplier nor any officer, employee or agent of Supplier will be deemed an employee of City. Except as expressly provided in Attachment A, Supplier has no authority or responsibility to exercise any rights or power vested in the City and therefore has no authority to bind or incur any obligation on behalf of the City. The selection and TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's &COMM PANELS page 3 of 10 112811. designation of the personnel of the City in the performance of this agreement shall be made by the City. 6.2 Supplier, its agents, officers, and employees are and at all times during the term of this Agreement shall represent and conduct themselves as independent Suppliers and not as employees of the City. 6.3 Supplier shall determine the method, details and means of performing the work and services to be provided by Supplier under this Agreement. Supplier shall be responsible to City only for the requirements and results specified in this Agreement and, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, shall not be subjected to City's control with respect to the physical action or activities of Supplier in fulfillment of this Agreement. If in the performance of this Agreement any third persons are employed by Supplier, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction and supervision and control of the Supplier. 7. Indemnification and Insurance: a. Supplier shall indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for any and all losses, claims, actions, judgments for damages, or injury to persons or property and losses and expenses and other costs including litigation costs and attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Supplier, its servants, agents, officers, employees, guests, and business invitees, and not caused by or arising out of the tortuous conduct of City or its employees. Supplier shall maintain, and specifically agrees that it will maintain, throughout the term of this Agreement, liability insurance, in which the City shall be named an additional insured, except Workers Compensation Insurance, in the minimum amounts as follow: General Liability One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per incident or occurrence, Automobile Liability Insurance One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per incident or occurrence and Workers' Compensation Insurance, in the statutory limits as required by law. The limits of insurance shall not be deemed a limitation of the covenants to indemnify and save and hold harmless City; and if City becomes liable for an amount in excess of the insurance limits, herein provided, Supplier covenants and agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless City from and for all such losses, claims, actions, or judgments for damages or injury to persons or property and other costs, including litigation costs and attorneys' fees, arising out of, resulting from , or in connection with the performance of this Agreement by the Supplier or Supplier's officers, employs, agents, representatives or sub- suppliers and resulting in or attributable to personal injury, death, or damage or destruction to tangible or intangible property, including use of. Supplier shall provide City with a Certificate of Insurance, or other proof of insurance evidencing Supplier's compliance with the requirements of this paragraph and file such proof of insurance with the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date Supplier begins performance of its obligations under this Agreement. In the event the insurance minimums are changed, Supplier shall immediately submit proof of compliance with the changed limits. TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's &COMM PANELS page 4 of 10 112811. Evidence of all insurance shall be submitted to the City Purchasing Agent with a copy to Meridian City Accounting, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho 83642. 7.2 Any deductibles, self-insured retention, or named insureds must be declared in writing to the City. 7.3 To the extent of the indemnity in this contract, Supplier's Insurance coverage shall be primary insurance regarding the City's elected officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City or the City's elected officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the Supplier's insurance and shall not contribute with Supplier's insurance except as to the extent of City's negligence. b. The Supplier's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 7.4 All insurance coverages for Suppliers subs shall be subject to all of the insurance and indemnity requirements stated herein. 7.5 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Supplier and Supplier's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 7.6 The limits of insurance described herein shall not limit the liability of the Contractor and Contractor's agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 8. Warranty: In addition to any warranty required in the specifications, all equipment, coatings, valves, controls, and other components provided under this agreement shall be guaranteed for two (2) years against defects in workmanship and materials from the notice of acceptance. 9. Notices: Any and all notices required to be given by either of the parties hereto, unless otherwise stated in this agreement, shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when mailed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: City of Meridian Procurement Manager 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 Ph. (208) 489-0417 Email: kwatts@meridianCity.org TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's &COMM PANELS page 5 of 10 112811. Either party may change their address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other in the manner herein provided. 10. Attorney Fees: Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief as may be granted, to court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction. This provision shall be deemed to be a separate contract between the parties and shall survive any default, termination or forfeiture of this Agreement. 11 . Time is of the Essence: The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to each and every term, condition and provision hereof, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. 12. Assignment: It is expressly agreed and understood by the parties hereto, that Supplier shall not have the right to assign, transfer, hypothecate or sell any of its rights under this Agreement except upon the prior express written consent of City. 13. Discrimination Prohibited: In performing the Work required herein, Supplier shall not unlawfully discriminate in violation of any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry, age or disability. 14. Reports and Information: 14.1 At such times and in such forms as the City may require, there shall be furnished to the City such statements, records, reports, data and information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement. 14.2 Supplier shall maintain all writings, documents and records prepared or compiled in connection with the performance of this Agreement for a minimum of four (4) years from the termination or completion of this or Agreement. This includes any handwriting, typewriting, printing, photo static, photographic and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation including letters, words, pictures, sounds or symbols or any combination thereof. 15. Audits and Inspections: Subject to applicable laws respecting the protection of privacy and the City's requirement to comply with the Idaho Public Records Act, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary, there shall be made available to the City for examination all of Supplier's records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement. Supplier shall permit the City to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, conditions of TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's &COMM PANELS page 6 of 10 112811. employment and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. 16. Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material: No material produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 17. Compliance with Laws: In performing the scope of work required hereunder, Supplier shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of Federal, State, and local governments. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordancewith the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. Certifications. Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-2359 and 67-2346, Contractor hereby certifies: A. That Contractor is not currently owned or operated by the government of China and will not, for the duration of this Contract, be owned or operated by the government of China. B. That Contractor is not currently engaged in, and will not for the duration of the Contract engage in, a boycott of goods or services from Israel or territories under its control. C. Consultant certifies that: (i) as of the Effective Date, it is not engaged in a "Boycott," as defined in Idaho Code §67-2347A, of any individual or company because that individual or company engages in or supports (a) the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy, or agriculture, or (b) the manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of any "Firearm," as defined in Idaho Code §18- 3302(2)(d); and (ii) it will not engage in any such boycott during the Term. 18. Changes: The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Work to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of Supplier's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and Supplier, shall be incorporated in TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's &COMM PANELS page 7 of 10 112811. written amendments which shall be executed with the same formalities as this Agreement. 19. Construction and Severability: If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. 20. Waiver of Default: Waiver of default by either party to this Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach, and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of this Agreement unless this Agreement is modified as provided above. 21 . Advice of Attorney: Each party warrants and represents that in executing this Agreement. It has received independent legal advice from its attorney's or the opportunity to seek such advice. 22. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes any and all other agreements or understandings, oral of written, whether previous to the execution hereof or contemporaneous herewith. 24. Order of Precedence: The order or precedence shall be the contract agreement, the Invitation for Bid document, then the winning bidders submitted bid document. 23. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho, and the ordinances of the City of Meridian. 24. Approval Required: This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the City of Meridian. CITY OF MERIDIAN: ADVANCED ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIES: By: By: Keith Watts, Procurement Manager Dated: Dated: CITY PM: David Briggs Approved by Council. TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's & COMM PANELS page 8 of 10 112811. ATTACHMENT A SPECIFICATIONS & REQUIREMENTS REFER TO INVITATION TO BID PW-2426-11281 .L ALL ADDENDUMS, ATTACHMENTS, AND EXHIBITS included in the Invitation to Bid Package, are by this reference made a part hereof. SPECIFICATIONS / SCOPE OF WORK Documents from the Invitation to Bid: • VOLUME 1 : TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS — WRRF TERTIARY FILTRATION FACILITIES PRE- PROCUREMENT PACKAGE 2 by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (100 pages) • DRAWINGS — WRRF TERTIARY FILTRATION FACILITIES PRE-PROCUREMENT PACKAGE 2 by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (21 pages) See attached updated documents: • Rockwell Automation Document # STFB3MCC0001 • Updated Drawings: MERIDIAN WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY TERTIARY FILTRATION FACILITIES (19 pages) TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's & COMM PANELS page 9 of 10 112811. ATTACHMENT B MILESTONE / PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. Total and complete compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed $340,000.00. MILESTONE DATES/PRICING SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT SUPPLEMENTARY REFERENCE ITEM DESCRIPTION REFERENCE QTY TOTAL SPECIFICATION SPECIFICATIONS DRAWINGS 500-E-202 1 MCC's 26 24 19 500-E-604 $70,000.00 500-E-607 000-1-603 000-1-604 10 63 13 500-1-501 2 Chem Building 3 PLC 40 95 10 4091 00 500-1-502 $145,000.00 40 95 13 500-1-503 40 95 20 530-1-1501 530-1-502 530-1-503 000-1-603 000-1-604 10 63 13 500-1-501 3 TF Building PLC 40 95 10 4091 00 500-1-502 $95,000.00 40 95 13 500-1-503 40 95 20 530-1-1501 530-1-502 530-1-503 000-1-603 10 63 13 000-1-604 4 Chem Building 3 Comms 40 95 10 4091 00 500-1-504 Panel 40 95 13 500-1-505 $15,000.00 40 95 20 530-1-504 530-1-505 000-1-603 10 63 13 000-1-604 5 TF Building Comms Panel 40 95 10 4091 00 500-1-504 $15,000.00 40 95 13 500-1-505 40 95 20 530-1-504 530-1-505 Contract includes furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals as required for the Tertiary Filtration Electrical Package 2 - Pre-Procurement per ITB #PW-2426-11281 .L. All equipment shall be delivered (FOB Destination) to the City, 3401 N. Ten Mile Road, Meridian, ID 83646. The manufacturer will submit at time of delivery; complete operation and maintenance manuals covering the equipment as delivered. CONTRACT TOTAL....................... $340,000.00 TERTIARY FILTRATION ELECTRICAL PACKAGE 2—MCC's, PLC's &COMM PANELS page 10 of 10 112811. Rockwell Automation Centerline 2100 Motor Control Center Basic Structure Information Project Name: City of Meridian WRRF TF Project Item: STFB3MCC0001 Project ID#: 5334856/1 Motor Control Center Details This MCC(s)was developed using an available fault current of 50,001 to 65,000 A. MCC configuration & pricing subject to change, if actual Available Fault Current differs. Motor Control Center Details Insulated Bus: None Selected Power System Type:Wye, 3-phase,3-wire with solidly grounded neutral Horizontal Ground Bus Size: 1/4"X 2" Voltage:480 Volts/60 Hertz Horizontal Ground Bus Plating: Unplated Copper Available Fault Current: 50,001 to 65,000 A Horizontal Ground Bus Location:Bottom Master Nameplate: 1 Line(s) Vertical Ground Bus Type: Unit Load Copper and Plug-in Unit Nameplate Type:Acrylic-Black letters on white Copper Wiring Type:B-T Control and Power Terminal Blocks Incoming Ground Lug Size:#6 AWG-250 kcmil(2 Wiring Diagram Location:Within each unit Supplied as Standard) Arc Resistant MCC: No Incoming Ground Cable Size: None Selected IntelliCENTER Network: Ethernet IMC Device Firmware: Upgraded to latest available version Enclosure Details (saves up to 1 hour of customer configuration time per Enclosure Type: 1G-with Gasketed Doors section) NEMA 3R/4 Lifting Angle:No Section Depth: Front Mounted, 15"Deep Incoming Line Details Section Height:90"High MCC Connection Type: Main Circuit Breaker Stab Opening Protection:Automatic Shutters Incoming Line Cable Entry:Bottom Mounted Isolation Barriers:Yes Wireway Tie Bar:Yes Bus Details Main Bus Rating:600A Total Shipping Block(s): 1 Main Bus Material: Copper/Tin Plated Total Section(s): 3 Main Bus Bracing:65kA(rms symmetrical) Total Units : 16 Ethernet Network Information Full Ethernet Network Information can be found on the One-Line Diagram associated with this project item.This drawing can be obtained by requesting Pre-order drawings through PowerControl Builder. Section Modifications (Qtv/Mods) Section Number Section Width (inches) Options/Modifications 1 20" N/A 2 20" N/A 3 20" N/A Rockwell Automation Centerline 2100 Motor Control Center Unit Description Project Name: City of Meridian WRRF TF Project Item: STFB3MCC0001 Project ID#: 5334856/1 General Information Line Voltage/Frequency: 480 Volts/60 Hertz Power System Configuration: Wye, 3-phase, 3-wire with solidly grounded neutral Class I Wiring Type: B-T Control and Power Terminal Blocks NEMA Enclosure Type: 1 G-with Gasketed Doors Available Fault Current: 50,001 to 65,000 A Unit Nameplate Type: Acrylic-Black letters on white Delivery Program: ENG Unit Information Description Unit Features Unit Loc:01A Del Prog: PEII Catalog Number:2100-ESW5220K-T10GRP-751S Unit ID:2 Total Space Factor= 1 ENSW-Stratix 5200 20-Port Full Stratix 5200 Firmware 1783-CMS20DN DLR(Device Level Ring) Power Adapters(w/Unit Mtg) Wiring Diagram 10007662157 Features Included Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) Name Plate Information ETHERNET SWITCH Ethernet Information Device Type IP Address Subnet Mask 2100-ESW 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 No Cable Length Ethernet Switch Firmware Version: LATEST Unit Loc:01C Del Prog:SCII Catalog Number:2100-EPS8KBH-30TGM-751S Unit ID: 1 Total Space Factor= 1 ENPS-Ethernet Power Supply Unit Circuit Breaker:Thermal Magnetic,65kA at 480V(G6C Frame)(15A Trip) Disconnect Type=Circuit Breaker Rating Control:Transformer with Secondary Fuse,Standard Capacity,Primary Fusing, 125A V/60Hz Control Wiring:#16 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu Wiring Diagram 10004071286 Features Included Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) Name Plate Information ETHERNET POWER SUPPLY Unit Loc:01E Del Prog: ENG Catalog Number:2100M-CKC-36TGM-79L-79U Unit ID: 5 Total Space Factor= 1.5 FCBX-Empty Unit Insert Circuit Breaker:Thermal Magnetic,65kA at 480V(G6C Frame)(60A Trip) Disconnect Type Circuit Breaker Wiring Diagram 10005455227 Features Included Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) Name Plate Information Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) SPD Engineered Spec(s)/Modification(s) (1)ASCO SPD-300 ka/phase(At 480V Delta or Wye-At 600V Wye only)-UL Rated,450""""P30ACCN20 (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram Unit Loc:01H Del Prog: FT1 Catalog Number:2193MB-DKC-48TKM-80A500 Unit ID:9 Total Space Factor=2.5 MCB-Main Circuit Breaker Circuit Breaker: Electronic(LSI),65kA at 480V(300)with Frame Rating of 400A(- NONE-Frame),Bottom Mounted,300ATrip Rating Lugs Supplied:Screw type mech.,CU/AL wire,350 kcmil Size Wire, 1 Cables per 300A Phase Wiring Diagram Engineered Spec(s)/Modification(s) 10004074268 (1) 140G Ground Fault, Electronic LSIG, Frame Sizes H,J, K(UL Rated),ARMS Option Name Plate Information (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram MAIN INCOMING BREAKER (1) 140G Maintenance Mode-Switch Mode Selector Switch, Blue Indicator Light, 300 AMP &Control components for K&M Frame.-Separate Source(no CPT)For R and N Frame breakers, use option-760A (1)0.5 Space Factor Adder (1)80VA Control Transformer-Fusing/Fuse Block Included,1497-B-BASX-3-N Unit Loc:02A Del Prog:SCII Catalog Number:2193F-CKC-41TJM-79L-79U Unit ID:7 Total Space Factor= 1.5 FCB-Feeder Circuit Breaker Circuit Breaker:Thermal Magnetic,65kA at 480V(125)with Frame Rating of 250A (J6 Frame), Plug-In Unit, 125ATrip Rating Lugs Supplied:Std Mech/Lug Pads,250 kcmil Size Wire, 1 Cables per Phase 125A Features Included Wiring Diagram Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) 10004849880 Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) Name Plate Information STFB3AH00001 HEAT PUMP Overload Relay(s) Motor Full Load Current(FLC)=Not Available Unit Loc:02D Del Prog: FT1 Catalog Number:2113B-BAB-3-5LGA-6P-7FE3EDCN3VR-39TGA-79L-79U- Unit ID: 3 85T-90-91-750-751S FVNR-Full Voltage Non-Reversing Starter w/CB Size: NEMA Size 1 Total Space Factor= 1 Rating Wiring: NEMA Type B wiring 5 HP Circuit Breaker: Instantaneous MCP, 100kA at 480V(G8P Frame)(15A Trip) Control:Transformer with Secondary Fuse,Standard Capacity,Primary Fusing, Wirinq Diagram 120V/6OHz 10008111980 Control Wiring:#14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned) Name Plate Information Features Included STFB3EXH0001 Selector Switch: HAND-OFF-AUTO(-3) EXHAUST FAN NO 1 Pilot Light(s):ON-OFF Type: LED Push To Test,Color(s):Green,Amber(-5LGA) Std Capacity Control Power Transformer W/Primary Fuses(-6P) Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) Overload Relay(s) Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) E300 Comm Based Overload(7FE3) Elapsed Time Meter(-85T) E300 Communication Option=EtherNet/IP 1 NO on Starter(-90) E300 Voltage Code= 120V AC 1 NC on Starter(-91) E300 Control Module=Control Only #14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned)(-750) E300 Sensing Module=0.5-30A Curr/Grnd Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) Fault/Volt E300 Operator Station=Electronic Reset Engineered Spec(s)/Modification(s) E300 Expansion Module=Not Available (1)Bulletin 800T/H,Selector Switch, Padlocking Cover, Part number 800T-N163 Motor RPM=1800 (Padlock not included),800T-N163 Motor Full Load Current(FLC)=6.88 Motor Service Factor= 1.15 (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram (1)Bulletin 800H, Push Button, Push-Pull or Push-Pull/Twist,Maintained Contact, Non-I Iluminated,800H-FRX???? Ethernet Information (1)Rockwell Automation Bulletin 700-HK Slim Line Relay, DPDT,2-pole,2 Form C, Device Type IPAddress Subnet Mask AgNi Contacts,700-H K32? 2113 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 Note-TD4,TD5 Cable Length:2.3 m E300 Overload Firmware Version:LATEST Unit Loc:02F Del Prog: FT1 Catalog Number:2113B-BAB-3-5LGA-6P-7FE3EDCN3VR-39TGA-79L-79U- Unit ID: 3 85T-90-91-750-751S FVNR-Full Voltage Non-Reversing Starter w/CB Size: NEMA Size 1 Total Space Factor= 1 Rating Wiring: NEMA Type B wiring 5 HP Circuit Breaker: Instantaneous MCP, 100kA at 480V(G8P Frame)(15A Trip) Control:Transformer with Secondary Fuse,Standard Capacity,Primary Fusing, Wirinq Diagram 120V/6OHz 10008111980 Control Wiring:#14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned) Name Plate Information Features Included STFB3EXH0002 Selector Switch: HAND-OFF-AUTO(-3) EXHAUST FAN NO 2 Pilot Light(s):ON-OFF Type: LED Push To Test,Color(s):Green,Amber(-5LGA) Std Capacity Control Power Transformer W/Primary Fuses(-6P) Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) Overload Relay(s) Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) E300 Comm Based Overload(7FE3) Elapsed Time Meter(-85T) E300 Communication Option=EtherNet/IP 1 NO on Starter(-90) E300 Voltage Code= 120V AC 1 NC on Starter(-91) E300 Control Module=Control Only #14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned)(-750) E300 Sensing Module=0.5-30A Curr/Grnd Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) Fault/Volt E300 Operator Station=Electronic Reset Engineered Spec(s)/Modification(s) E300 Expansion Module=Not Available (1)Bulletin 800T/H,Selector Switch, Padlocking Cover, Part number 800T-N163 Motor RPM=1800 (Padlock not included),800T-N163 Motor Full Load Current(FLC)=6.88 Motor Service Factor= 1.15 (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram (1)Bulletin 800H, Push Button, Push-Pull or Push-Pull/Twist,Maintained Contact, Non-I Iluminated,800H-FRX???? Ethernet Information (1)Rockwell Automation Bulletin 700-HK Slim Line Relay, DPDT,2-pole,2 Form C, Device Type IPAddress Subnet Mask AgNi Contacts,700-H K32? 2113 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0 Note-TD4,TD5 Cable Length:2.63 m E300 Overload Firmware Version:LATEST Unit Loc:02H Del Prog: FT1 Catalog Number:2113B-BAB-3-5LGA-6P-7FE3EDCN3VR-41TGA-79L-79U- Unit ID:4 85T-90-91-750-751S FVNR-Full Voltage Non-Reversing Starter w/CB Size: NEMA Size 1 Total Space Factor= 1 Rating Wiring: NEMA Type B wiring 10 HP Circuit Breaker: Instantaneous MCP, 100kA at 480V(G8P Frame)(30A Trip) Control:Transformer with Secondary Fuse,Standard Capacity,Primary Fusing, Wiring Diagram 120V/6OHz 10008111982 Control Wiring:#14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned) Name Plate Information Features Included SPARE Selector Switch: HAND-OFF-AUTO(-3) Pilot Light(s):ON-OFF Type: LED Push To Test,Color(s):Green,Amber(-5LGA) Std Capacity Control Power Transformer W/Primary Fuses(-6P) Overload Relay(s) Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) E300 Comm Based Overload(7FE3) Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) E300 Communication Option=EtherNet/IP Elapsed Time Meter(-85T) E300 Voltage Code= 120V AC 1 NO on Starter(-90) E300 Control Module=Control Only 1 NC on Starter(-91) E300 Sensing Module=0.5-30A Curr/Grnd #14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned)(-750) Fault/Volt Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) E300 Operator Station=Electronic Reset E300 Expansion Module=Not Available Motor RPM=1800 Engineered Soec(s)/Modification(s) Motor Full Load Current(FLC)= 13.65 (1)Bulletin 800T/H,Selector Switch, Padlocking Cover, Part number 800T-N163 Motor Service Factor= 1.15 (Padlock not included),800T-N163 (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram (1)Bulletin 800H, Push Button, Push-Pull or Push-Pull/Twist,Maintained Contact, Ethernet Information Non-Illuminated,800H-FRX???? Device Type IPAddress Subnet Mask (1)Rockwell Automation Bulletin 700-HK Slim Line Relay, DPDT,2-pole,2 Form C, 2113 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.0 AgNi Contacts,700-H K32? Note-TD4,TD5 Cable Length:2.96 m E300 Overload Firmware Version:LATEST Unit Loc:02K Del Prog:SCII Catalog Number:2100-BK05 Unit ID: 10 Total Space Factor=0.5 DOOR-Blank Unit Door Unit Loc:02L Del Prog:SCII Catalog Number:2100-BK10 Unit ID: 11 Total Space Factor= 1 DOOR-Blank Unit Door Unit Loc:03A Del Prog:SCII Catalog Number:2193F-AKB-34TGM-79L-79U Unit ID: 6 Total Space Factor= 1 FCB-Feeder Circuit Breaker Circuit Breaker:Thermal Magnetic,65kA at 480V(40)with Frame Rating of 125A (G6C Frame), Plug-In Unit,40ATrip Rating Lugs Supplied:Std Mech/Lug Pads, 1/OAWG Size Wire, 1 Cables per Phase 40A Features Included Wiring Diagram Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) 10004266840 Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) Name Plate Information STFB3MKU0001 MAKE UP AIR UNIT Overload Relay(s) Motor Full Load Current(FLC)=Not Available Unit Loc:03C Del Prog: FT1 Catalog Number:2113B-BAB-3-5LGA-6P-7FE3EDCN3VR-41TGA-79L-79U- Unit ID:4 85T-90-91-750-751S FVNR-Full Voltage Non-Reversing Starter w/CB Size: NEMA Size 1 Total Space Factor= 1 Rating Wiring: NEMA Type B wiring 10 HP Circuit Breaker: Instantaneous MCP, 100kA at 480V(G8P Frame)(30A Trip) Control:Transformer with Secondary Fuse,Standard Capacity,Primary Fusing, Wiring Diagram 120V/6OHz 10008111982 Control Wiring:#14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned) Name Plate Information Features Included STFB3EXH0003 Selector Switch: HAND-OFF-AUTO(-3) EXHAUST FAN NO 3 Pilot Light(s):ON-OFF Type: LED Push To Test,Color(s):Green,Amber(-5LGA) Std Capacity Control Power Transformer W/Primary Fuses(-6P) Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) Overload Relay(s) Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) E300 Comm Based Overload(7FE3) Elapsed Time Meter(-85T) E300 Communication Option=EtherNet/IP 1 NO on Starter(-90) E300 Voltage Code= 120V AC 1 NC on Starter(-91) E300 Control Module=Control Only #14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned)(-750) E300 Sensing Module=0.5-30A Curr/Grnd Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) Fault/Volt E300 Operator Station=Electronic Reset Engineered Spec(s)/Modification(s) E300 Expansion Module=Not Available (1)Bulletin 800T/H,Selector Switch, Padlocking Cover, Part number 800T-N163 Motor RPM=1800 (Padlock not included),800T-N163 Motor Full Load Current(FLC)= 13.65 Motor Service Factor= 1.15 (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram (1)Bulletin 800H, Push Button, Push-Pull or Push-Pull/Twist,Maintained Contact, Non-I Iluminated,800H-FRX???? Ethernet Information (1)Rockwell Automation Bulletin 700-HK Slim Line Relay, DPDT,2-pole,2 Form C, Device Type IPAddress Subnet Mask AgNi Contacts,700-H K32? 2113 192.168.1.5 255.255.255.0 Note-TD4,TD5 Cable Length:2.64 m E300 Overload Firmware Version:LATEST Unit Loc:03E Del Prog: FT1 Catalog Number:2113B-CAB-3-5LGA-6P-7FE3EDCN6VR-44TGA-79L-79U- Unit ID:8 85T-90-91-750-751S FVNR-Full Voltage Non-Reversing Starter w/CB Size: NEMA Size 2 Total Space Factor= 1 Rating Wiring: NEMA Type B wiring 25 HP Circuit Breaker: Instantaneous MCP, 100kA at 480V(G8P Frame)(50A Trip) Control:Transformer with Secondary Fuse,Standard Capacity,Primary Fusing, Wiring Diagram 120V/6OHz 10008111984 Control Wiring:#14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned) Name Plate Information Features Included SPARE Selector Switch: HAND-OFF-AUTO(-3) Pilot Light(s):ON-OFF Type: LED Push To Test,Color(s):Green,Amber(-5LGA) Std Capacity Control Power Transformer W/Primary Fuses(-6P) Overload Relay(s) Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) E300 Comm Based Overload(7FE3) Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) E300 Communication Option=EtherNet/IP Elapsed Time Meter(-85T) E300 Voltage Code= 120V AC 1 NO on Starter(-90) E300 Control Module=Control Only 1 NC on Starter(-91) E300 Sensing Module=6-60A Curr/Grnd Fault/Volt #14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned)(-750) E300 Operator Station=Electronic Reset Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) E300 Expansion Module=Not Available Motor RPM=1800 Engineered Spec(s)/Modification(s) Motor Full Load Current(FLC)=32.34 (1)Bulletin 800T/H,Selector Switch, Padlocking Cover, Part number 800T-N163 Motor Service Factor= 1.15 (Padlock not included),800T-N163 (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram Ethernet Information (1)Bulletin 800H, Push Button, Push-Pull or Push-Pull/Twist,Maintained Contact, Device Type IPAddress Subnet Mask Non-Illuminated,800H-FRX???? 2113 192.168.1.6 255.255.255.0 (1)Rockwell Automation Bulletin 700-HK Slim Line Relay, DPDT,2-pole,2 Form C, AgNi Contacts,700-H K32? Cable Length:2.97 m Note-TD4,TD5 E300 Overload Firmware Version:LATEST Unit Loc:03G Del Prog: FT1 Catalog Number:2113B-BAB-3-5LGA-6P-7FE3EDCN3VR-41TGA-79L-79U- Unit ID:4 85T-90-91-750-751S FVNR-Full Voltage Non-Reversing Starter w/CB Size: NEMA Size 1 Total Space Factor= 1 Rating Wiring: NEMA Type B wiring 10 HP Circuit Breaker: Instantaneous MCP, 100kA at 480V(G8P Frame)(30A Trip) Control:Transformer with Secondary Fuse,Standard Capacity,Primary Fusing, Wiring Diagram 120V/6OHz 10008111982 Control Wiring:#14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned) Name Plate Information Features Included SPARE Selector Switch: HAND-OFF-AUTO(-3) Pilot Light(s):ON-OFF Type: LED Push To Test,Color(s):Green,Amber(-5LGA) Std Capacity Control Power Transformer W/Primary Fuses(-6P) Overload Relay(s) Unit Ground Load Connector Unplated Cu(-79L) E300 Comm Based Overload(7FE3) Unit Grd Stab Unplated Cu(-79U) E300 Communication Option=EtherNet/IP Elapsed Time Meter(-85T) E300 Voltage Code= 120V AC 1 NO on Starter(-90) E300 Control Module=Control Only 1 NC on Starter(-91) E300 Sensing Module=0.5-30A Curr/Grnd #14 AWG MTW(TEW)Cu(Tinned)(-750) Fault/Volt Sleeve Type Markers(-751 S) E300 Operator Station=Electronic Reset E300 Expansion Module=Not Available Motor RPM=1800 Engineered Specs)/Modification(s) Motor Full Load Current(FLC)= 13.65 (1)Bulletin 800T/H,Selector Switch, Padlocking Cover, Part number 800T-N163 Motor Service Factor= 1.15 (Padlock not included),800T-N163 (1)Engineered Modification and/or Custom Diagram (1)Bulletin 800H, Push Button, Push-Pull or Push-Pull/Twist,Maintained Contact, Ethernet Information Non-Illuminated,800H-FRX???? Device Type IPAddress Subnet Mask (1)Rockwell Automation Bulletin 700-HK Slim Line Relay, DPDT,2-pole,2 Form C, 2113 192.168.1.7 255.255.255.0 AgNi Contacts,700-H K32? Note-TD4,TD5 Cable Length: 3.3 m E300 Overload Firmware Version:LATEST Unit Loc:03J Del Prog:SCII Catalog Number:2100-BK10 Unit ID: 11 Total Space Factor= 1 DOOR-Blank Unit Door Unit Loc:03L Del Prog:SCII Catalog Number:2100-BK10 Unit ID: 11 Total Space Factor= 1 DOOR-Blank Unit Door � k O ° U 2 � 3 \ ° f § W E @ § 0 } \ ~ LL R k 0a U = 0 � § 2 U 0 E } \ § kk 0 �7 �\ ) )E f $ E 0 d\_\ s 3 = o( \ fE \ f/ Oo %± /e \E n \\\ y ) I § § @§ § _» 3 ± » k }2 a a29 � 9E } E {k « ongr2o )\\ m I I § j - § % - 07 . 2 » 2g 2 § » 3 § CC, ƒ// ( < /{ k \ CL 4 m x _ n 2 2 $ jR j - } § � s / 1 1 - - , -d ® / / a0 m « 0 u . w LL 0 _ . it ■ ƒ § 3 L $ / f on j\ !k \ \ zw 0 � z 2 ¢ z ^ to r a �z z �z ° ° = LU w H d J ° w IL J & ¢ 4 W u�. NOlJNIHSVM NOOBHO jtf, W z_ dfl- W—, i :a. a000 == u wwa< oo i`s Ss W �Z(`o�&ioo a£ iww" >U) m3u3 --�� Q>Q n3 �oo �ao»> ------ LL wf�Eff o 0 $ � oo V$Vw n U) wwwwww — I w 0 O c W J � o u Q CD V � � o 4) z Q Q CD Q o w w w z c� wco m Q �u >- w 4 > oj:� � U � z N C) o o � U O �>- LU U 0::� how w w Q LU 0 0 U �— � N � ww a �aa __ r anssl -_ _ oHval'Nvlaladw — Z S3111110VJiw� M s9essereoir —— —— z O NOI1Vb1lH ANVllb31 ' 90Lf8 o4Wl'anof -- o g�o o;ixeso�h,oa,aNa°a Z p U AlI11OVd Ad3A0038 0_ ' ps 3odnoS3Y 831VM NVIQld3W a I� 3 �a�ue�S ® N �Z p a zo 18 .� 'E V 0=8 g NVIGIMN 30 Allo o g I3 3 JuoJlnsuo� d Joafoid/Juap� d_ F S% p Q o � F w Q 8 p E Z S a g g Y zo o w �3" p°" w 0 0 O O�F6 Off' 0 m as o a u` �4G 4G 68 68 --oga a a �o0 oa 3 ���� �3-a IIIII IIIII p� 0 U m Q ww a �aa __ r anssl -_ _ oHval'wvlaladw S3111110VJ s9essereoir —— —— z O NOI1Vbll11 AilVllb31 'n 90Lf8 o4Wl'anof -- o g o n u 0 o;ixeso�h,oa,aNaaa Z O U AlI11JVd Ad3AOJ38 0_ ' pls 3odnoS3Y 831VM NVI41Y3W �a I� 3- � ® _ �O� zj �a�ue�s N �Z o 22 m0 E u NVIGIMN 3O AiO o g o Ala °.3 O luglnsuo� laafoid/lua.10 n`- F uU a 6 0 o rc g € 0 0 owk j s <a$ m g I�1 -_�.�I mwx 6 Frc oLU wLL - Z w 8ow ��x x "- Q- - w - - F¢u zo Z. w a� w � w � sae I w I I w j I W !� IIIIIw w I O w 0-0� $fie sW O �a ®000 m� g6dqdddd ddOQ a 3--ogg 3 I I-3-3-3 =,IIIII $�E 3 d dd rc �F 44 QQ �q I --o8a I I $ I � I I LLLL 3 0 U m Q \ g � ; \/ V,_m : o _ ——— ——— !§§ G9 »mom O , - ___ 2-- g6 oo , *__ \, [ ( _ z$ �00 0 !);! J8 u■ \ [�K2/ �4® � ( K{ D °/\ e =mf!%[!q) !i� § ^ _ ) \ m ( § Iz j m ([(i M- / \((� Wd } ( \ - ± !.... r � (((\ _- } > § m ? ( j 49 g ƒ § (§ " / { a 2 § \ / () )(\( LL 2 » Ig z, j § LL o \ § j ® * LZ @ ] « ) ww „ .,aa __ panssl -_ _ oevai'Nviaiadw s Z s28 a o S3111110VJ R g s9essereoir*�iai —— z O =` N _ NOI1Vb1lH ANVllb31 'c i 90Lf8 o4Wl'anof g o o O os ix eso�h,oa,aNaaa ps Z O U °_"° AlI11JVd A83AOJ38 0 Le)' 3odnoS3Y 831VM NVIQld3W ¢ I� ® _ �O� $a R$y -ws i 7 a�Ul�S N °`ZO V a� oa°�I� 'E p-g e NVIGIMN 3O Allo ogg>IAFwg 0.3� Ju,pu., 'a q Iz is 10 02 € axx � oN ow w � � id yy a c - - � x3eaa = - - - 3 3 � 3 � � � 11J m'6i 'w 'x'� g _ _ _ _ $ 3 3 3 3 3 a m � 0 w u 4 - - - - wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww � � ooa � 0000 � � o w 3333 - - - - - . - - - - - - - ass ; _ = o00 = = = w = = = = = _ k poor q nab P-1 -= oHV(a'NVIaININ S Z S3111110VJ M w z O =`_°' NOI1Vall11 AaVlla31 '90Lf8 4WI 3an,�o9 ego p o;ix ego,h,oa,aNaa os z O U m "� uI110Vd Ad3AOJ3 z Le)a e ....... 3odnos3a 831VM NVI4Ia3W 0 �a�ue�s N °`Z o o 0 a° Ig 'E V=8 g NVIGIMN 3o u�0 o g o;I3 ��oiinsuoo d �oaro,dnaa�io d- S2 6° 00 z c 0 0 0 0 w II V V z s� a3 to a»x ayx �'s s a ag Rm Ua m/ 0�m/ m/0� �p N�0 _ _ _ o O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m I I am _ m Iwo LLI q $I H I� I "T w l L_- __J a- p U m Q paae p nab panssl oevai'Nviaiadw Z M o S3111110VJ Ed NOI1Vb1lH ANVllb31 90LfE o4Wl'anof -- o g O o;ixeso�h,oa,aNaaa°s z O U m="E AlI11JVd A83AOJ38 oz 3odnoS3Y 831VM NVIQld3W k o p ® _ �O� Via° -wca_iQ o )atue4s ti °`Zo �a °a� lg �z< m0 'E V p!g °'o d °d NVIGIMN 30 Allo o¢o I F woo °o C) Juglnsuo� z Jaafoid/Jua!I0 d- - U S rc 6 € z H �a ° _0. @@g wo a $ _ 1. zw z a - €p8 8 _w Y� - m t8 1. 1. "°-q 8 W w 'S a z 0 0 H � 5 z. o� i '� o: ° 0 0 �6 0 0 0 H p � 3 y _ o$_0 5 k' � �: OE O J 3 {O sg' asp - °a {O 0 0 J 8 s �a�� �< > > - w m ' E Q r'r x x_�? m rc rc _ rar� J w w = y z 0 3 9 0 0 0 Dw a 0 Y ttes::.t® Q m Dr m7T7 Z � a < w w w w w w w w w w w z w _ s 0 a w oZ rop LL m U U)z J_ <.e m U) of .zErsz-Z W F J LL H O g J W z a z z 0 0 LL W m Iz J _ W - a - < a 3 5 $ o u m a S3111110VJ g } V,_m : \ G »mom�, - Lo 2-- g6 oo , *__ § , [ 2 _ �s „ �° ! % J8 ue \ [�K2/ �fE : rZ. °/\ e =mf %[! / $\C lz .Z ,! §) , ® ) z. r & � ) z z Z> \\ \\| � ! \ ! )` 2 E :) \ _ !� \ g � ; \/ V,_m : \ w- _, »mom OD�, - ___ ggWin, *__ \ [ \ - z$ „ �° J8 u■ \ [�K2/ �,dE ( r\o °/\ �=mf!%[! /( {\� ) ~ ! | \ m ( j \ ° Iz m ([(i i(/| / (( \ ± !!i! (55 _- } > § m ? ( j ƒ § (§ § \ 0 ) ` \CL ;!( , §(/( (j §|!§ ea ) G § 0 \ ! |!r » . 0 ��� "M \ 00, ,« )0 Of ® j ® * L @ ] « ) ww „ .,aa __ panssi -= oevai'Nviaiadw S3111110VJ d N s9essereoir*�iai —— z O =`_ NOI1Vbll11 AilVllb31 'c 90Lf8 o4Wl'anof g o o m O osix Z O U AlI11JVd Ad3AOJ38 c9 'eso�h,oa,aNaaa ps `E 0 3odnoS3Y 831VM NVIQld3W 'E Vp-gaQ NVI41 ON 3O Allo og 3;I3F wp o.oM Ju,pu., z°d °' Jaafoid/Juap� d_ - U m o � R zo y EE g p 4 A a 4 4 0 9 4 10 W a w m I w 3 a dog � e _ _ � _ € € Apoo p � = 3 � ggsg s � poap � z w w � - _ - - - - - - < < qw- 3a - F 3 's Q u1 '� '� '� '� 3 w K m m m _ _ 3 - u� �n _ _ _ _ _ yy a3 c � x3eaa = w{WWa � j ommj � � p � = 3 = 3 � 3 � � _ ow $ m 3 3 3 3 3 a m � 0 1. zo wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww � � 000a � 0000a � o ; = = 000000 = = = = w = = = = = w R & R A S w W A GS 8 S ffi k ww „ .,aa __ panssl -= oevai'Nviaiadw S3111110VJ M s9essereoir*�ia, —— z o =`_ NOI1Vb1lH ANVllb31 'c 90Lf8 o4Wl'anof -- g o o m< O osix eso, Z AlI11JVd A83AOJ38 c9 'h,oa,aNaaa ps I M 0 3odnoS3Y 831VM NVIQld3W �E= Un 'E V=8g NVIGI N3OAllo o¢o;I3 m w .3M ��oiinsuo° d �oaro,dnaa,io W) 00 z zz 0 0 0 0 T_ So Iz II V V z s z. a3 to a»x ayx �'s s oy - - mr gym(°gym( m( mr°� ssg cxg sx LLx LLx sxE LLxm LL,E LL m \ \ \ \ \ �p o z. ao �p, z z z z zz z z z a �_ u� o I I I I I I <$ ?O O 0 I o n LL o1 Iw� wl _ J a— 0 U m Q paae p nab panssl -= oeval'Nvlaladw S3111110VJ f o ps9essxeoir*�iai —— —— z O =`_ NOI1Vb1lH ANVllb31 90Lf8o4Wl'anof goo O o;ixeso�h,oa,aNaaa°s Z O U °_"° AlI11JVd A83AOJ38 c9 0 � O y€a 0 3odnoS3Y 831VM NVI41Y3W v I� g a �a�ue�S ® N �zz rR oa =l8- o U $oQ ucd m� 'E s NVI41a3W 30 Allo o¢a I3 F w w o.o M Juglnsuo� i d °' Jaafoid/Juallo d_ - u a p 6 W) € z 0. z < § H � Y > a 1 a p`W'' s Y° a m w i w ig � p ooR w w 0 0 0 LL s s sp o rr� 0 0 - 3 Za0 ttes::.t®®;�® O O ° mmO z J a p U z O H w _ s Z a o mO M z R co z r O D 00 r.e Lw w w .zfrsz<<.z J Q U LU w U H Z) O g J w z a z z O 0 w w m Iz J _ w - a - < a 3 E 5 � o u m a cew p nab panss� -= OHVOl'NYll S3111110VJ f o Le) ps9essxeoir*�iai —— —— z O =`_ N011Vbllll ANYllb31 - 90Lf8 o4Wl'anof -- -- g o o O osixeso�h,oa,aNaa —— —— ¢p U =m AIIIIOVd A83A0038 z u �anoss c E 0 3odnos3Y 831VM NVI4IY3W ¢ I� g a �a�ue�s ® N ;az0 R oao lg- �3 m0 'E V p-$aQ NVI41a3W 30AlIO og Vl3' ww o.3M Ju,in,u., i d °' Jaafoid/Juap� d_ - u a p 6 �3 8 0o m LL m m X m m m m m a e 5 e a e m m m ao z. �p, li Jill 4 o yc o r d2 d2 ƒ——— ——— ; g , @ Q o __, ——— ——— =■kb/ em_009, \ �; q, . ——— ■--Q# _»__ �2,�, \� a8�u■4� \ ! § { __em \z 6 , §!! (\( ! z § !( ; \ \} | | | | \ » 4! T ( ( ( § \( § LL ƒ \ . , \ \ ! q \ , \} ; ; r) , � � __ © > S = --- ___ � ; \\ ,_m : \ :! um_�, - C4 ——— 2-- gg nn,_*__ §, LU d` :` a8�ue�� ——— ——— \ -zzpi )\!! E 0 �! r{o ° /\ __=m ;!4$!\! {\Lo ) } ( ! ; n (�) \ )�( e !); \ (() ) }}\ m .,. ()/ § g k § § / S , > §; ;! S � Naa panel — OHtl01•NtlI01d'3W ..a•�.�.o.�•ooa,.�• ,e.,•.."•ate` —— —— Z ozP€ 531111IOVa a - N psvessrci —— —— O K @ g E &F � NolivanH Aavuaai n € A11110Va Aa3A003a m o� gowosn a31VM NVI01a3W 8 e:e m o Y.1 �lal�S °Z €$ _ 7a ® �J E d og Nvlala3waouo $�od dui �O 6033-008 ON ONIMIICI ww my V-V 3NIIHOltlw gQ�°zrc �_61 w Yco LU z rn LU ! Taox amp pe�pc epwx .LLLL LL m w i Alp I �A� Om°� � ffio F r - J888999892 m� -pp s �= F L --J o toi elm I � - H ° 82 amamaama � �amamamammamamamam� °x ° �-®;��Fagg a��yyy�H�Hyyy�H�Hyyy�H�Hymmyy�y ". i I° p««�,�w°rasa L.._..J gPi oe $m -i L N s -"L"J I' a elm L---rrm —i m �s�m�g — L - N m— i §rm Ohs• � 8 alm L J o"° N=o L -i �$rm O2 1: F � ---0 --------------------------1 . -'p- h� I N a�. ��.i O U m caauom,Gm A, P.-I -= OHV41'NVI41tl3W wwo�v�e^mow —— —— iea Z 8 P 5 531111IOV3 - M eceoir re —— x�ea W13tld®.ten a O -_ NOI1Vbll11 AilVlli131 �'c O E S90Lf8 o4oPl'xsoa -- F u o z O U wm a AlII0V3 A83AO338 - 5� 3Dmo 38 831VM NVICINRq -- -- �p� oarsiz� �gy mo W �- d V E° NVIGIMVq lO A113 o _ "m aro,en�all� d f s - Edo q €= 8 ------------------------- Iz o o> 5 p o Z.Z. Z. z° O oLu ro I >a ti Z Z a Z.o W = gg Q a 111 o 0 0 -- 'a 'ao ?�io�a z a z i au, j°a d E o W - <m yRmmS 0 ! p ��Ezoz i �� o i i y i i ~ i Ala i w i n i i n i �aw gwg I I n I I o.se-�z„z, F�zo R I I I I m N I I I I I I j 88 j z � avc�n�z, M� I I i i m o I'z, N-2 I I L J r Ru $z FN �, Nz ylozrc >'°z. i Ala i i Flo O„ ^� I k�m "Z ow Nm h m-m .eE ------------------------------------------------ L- J r i ^- ^$z I,g m m�'y� N�z 4 I, sslb yaaas�M r rym= l E -nz� -------------- -1 j R' j x6z M9-3-009 ON ONIMV'dG - V-V 3NIlHO1VW 'N paauomIGN A, P.-I —= OHV41'NVI41tl3W ��,..,�,m a.a..p�.a.q• •. '. ,w -- -- iea�n.N�w�,an<na Z 28P5 531111IOV3 Wog eceoir re —— a�9OW13tld®.an3n a O _ NOI1VNiIIA AdVIldli S90Lf8 o4oPl'xswa -- z O U wm a AlII0V3 A83AO338 — 5� 3Dmo 38 831VM NVICINRq -- -- �p� oars �gy mo W �awe4s ® N WZz iz� moo - �- d V E° NVIGI N lO AlIO o _ "m aro,en�all� d f s sa�oxaa a em $ o U Z. cn O w w p p w € w Z € 8lo w z w U x o w HEM _ w �x �� w w O m 3� sZ" M�v �8e r � -jEIz Iz L-J i I Ali I I I 8 I I � osz�o��e one�a<<e c -----_--J N � I � I ILL m `ass e m n H I,HN ^x Z. �H — — o g $y He m�i_ -J NwLL -E EA r — — ngz- Insy ZI w — y m I I I I I I I I I I L J U m Q � ; \\ NOliVNillA I : \ , o :§n \/ LU um_�, - � 2-- gg n�,_*__ §,«§ )�- a8�ue�� \ ��o 0 \`° j(�, } E 52/ ; � �* .!o ° /\ __=m ;!4$!\�\ iz \� ) n [ \ \ § § I ! § \ mI § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § f § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § s . — [ , \ $ ( \ } \ ) aL § ------ ;;j ; © ) \ <$ ) ) § [ / § \ _ § o , . ( 7- X. �/ / /� ! § §( ( ( _ _ ; � E [> Z ! > 2 // \ /\ ) / \ \\\ » i ! ■ ! § ! ! ! > ! ! ! f : : ! : ! : ! ! § 5 § ! § § § § ; § ! ! B : ! ! ! B ! ! � f § E \ E § ! § E § § § f § f § f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ) E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. i CITY OF MERIDIAN CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: October 8, 2024 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline Changes to Agenda: None Item #7: The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 Vacation (H-2024-0042) Application(s): Vacation Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.156 acres of land, zoned R-8, located at 5449 W. Daphne Drive. History: N/A Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Medium-Density Residential Summary of Request: The applicant is requesting approval to vacate a one (1) foot portion of the permanent easement for public utilities, pressure irrigation, and lot drainage encumbering the subject lot. The beforementioned easements have been re-established as a result of the approved Property Boundary Adjustment (PBA) and subsequent recording of a quitclaim deed, which formally established a new property boundary. The vacation of this portion of the easement will allow for the home already constructed on the subject lot to no longer be located in the subject easement. The lot originated when The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 final plat was recorded as instrument number 2021-042866 on March 16, 2021. The lot was subsequently adjusted as a result of a PBA application (PBA-2023-0019), which was approved on March 29, 2024. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: None Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2024-0042, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of 10/08/2024: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2024-0042, as presented during the hearing on 10/08/2024, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2024-0042 to the hearing date of ___ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #8: Bradshaw Corner Subdivision (SHP-2024-0003) Application(s): Short Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 0.508 acres of land, zoned R-4 (Low to Medium Density Residential, located at 735 W. Cherry Lane. History: N/A Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Medium-Density Residential Summary of Request: The applicant requests a short plat to subdivide an existing property into two (2) building lots in the R-4 zoning district. The proposed density of 4 units per acre is consistent with the density desired of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Density Residential Future Land Use Map designation for this site. There is an existing home that is proposed to stay on Lot 1 with a new garage that is currently in the permit process with the city and one (1) accessory structure on the property that is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Both structures currently comply with the setback standards in UDC 11-2A-5. However, the accessory structure cannot remain alone on Lot 2. The applicant shall apply for a new residential permit to construct a home or be converted into a dwelling unit with adequate parking or be removed from Lot 2 before the City Engineer's Signature. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: N/A Notes: Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number SHP-2024-0003, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of 10/08/2024: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number SHP-2024-0003, as presented during the hearing on 10/08/2024, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number SHP-2024-0003 to the hearing date of ___ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #9: Apex Farr (H-2024-0014) Application(s): Development Agreement Modification Rezone Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 131.89-acres of land, zoned R-4, R-8 and R-15, located on the west side of S. Locust Grove Rd., north of E. Lake Hazel Rd. History: The subject property, except for the R-2 zoned portion, was annexed in 2015 with an R-4 zoning district as part of the South Meridian Category A annexation, which included multiple properties and property owners. A “placeholder” R-4 zoning district was approved with individual DA’s for each property owner \[i.e. Arbor Ridge, Brighton Investments LLC, SCS Brighton LLC, Murgoitio Limited Partnership\], which require modification prior to development of the property to approve any proposed development plan. In 2020, a modification to the existing DA’s for Brighton Investments LLC, SCS Brighton LLC and Murgoitio Ltd. Partnership was approved, which replaced those agreements with one (1) new agreement (Apex). A rezone was approved for much of the subject property from the R-4 to the R-8 & R-15 districts. The Arbor Ridge R-4 zoned property along the northern boundary was under different ownership at that time and was not included in the rezone but is part of the subject rezone application. A preliminary plat was also approved for Apex Northwest Subdivision, which included the R-15 zoned portion of the subject property at the SEC. The conceptual Master Plan included in the DA depicts “future development” with no specific development plan for the areas not included in the preliminary plat with a general street layout on the land southwest of the Williams gas pipeline and a future school at the northwest corner of Locust Grove & Crescendo. In 2021, the R-2 zoned portion of the property was annexed with a DA and included as a lot in Shafer View Terrace Subdivision. This lot was depicted as a future phase with no specific development plan. A preliminary plat was approved in 2021 for Apex West Subdivision, which included the lot in Shafer View Terrace Subdivision and a portion of the subject property. A portion of this property is included in the subject preliminary plat; the remainder will be part of Apex West. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: LDR (Low Density Residential), MDR (Medium Density Residential) and MU-C (Mixed Use – Community) with a future school designation. Summary of Request: The Applicant requests a modification to the DA to include the South Meridian (Arbor Ridge) property and portions of the property annexed with Shafer View Terrace & Apex in a new DA with an updated conceptual development plan as shown; these properties will no longer be subject to the previous DA’s. The proposed development plan is generally consistent with the FLUM. The future school previously planned at the NWC of Locust Grove & Crescendo was shifted to the south side of Lake Hazel, east of Locust Grove. A Rezone of a total of 38.69-acres of land from R-2 to R-8 (0.76-acre), R-15 to C-C (6.66-acres) and R-4 to R-8 (31.27-acres) is proposed. The area proposed to be rezoned to R-8 is designated MDR on the Comp Plan FLUM, except for a 0.76-acre portion which is designated LDR. The area proposed to be zoned C-C is designated MU-C. The proposed zoning is consistent with the associated FLUM designations. A Preliminary Plat is proposed consisting of 381 SFR building lots, 6 commercial building lots & 60 common lots on 131.89-acres of land in the R-8, R-15 & C-C zoning districts and is a re-subdivision of a portion of Shafer View Terrace Subdivision (the remainder of which will be included in the Apex West final plat). The plat is proposed to develop in (7) final plat phases as shown on the phasing plan. The minimum lot size proposed is 4,180 s.f. with an average lot size of 8,021 s.f. A gross density of 2.84 units/acre with a net density of 5.43 units/acre is proposed, which is consistent with the density desired in the MDR FLUM designation. A mix of front-loaded & alley-loaded SFR units in a variety of different lot sizes are proposed with larger lots along the northern boundary to provide a transition to the rural lots to the north of the Farr Lateral. Access is proposed via the extension of E. Quartz Creek St. & E. Tranton St. at the project’s west boundary; and from S. Locust Grove Rd. via S. Apex Way & E. Crescendo St. An emergency access is proposed at the north boundary via S. Margaret Ave. Several common driveways are proposed as depicted on the plat; the driveway in Block 12 exceeds the maximum number of units on one side of the driveway, which will either require removal of one lot or an application for alternative compliance to this standard. Stub streets are proposed for future extension & interconnectivity with adjacent & future development in Apex/Pinnacle. A collector street is stubbed to the north, which will extend to E. Amity Rd. with future development; and S. Apex Way will extend to S. Locust Grove Rd. as a collector street in accord with the MSM. Cross-access/ingress-egress easements should be provided between all of the commercial lots. Private streets are planned for access to the rear-loaded homes in Blocks 2 & 23 because ACHD won’t allow these streets to be public alleys due to some of these lots not having frontage on a public street. Staff is concerned the provision of private streets in these blocks will create addressing issues for the units having frontage on two (2) named streets, which will likely create confusion & delays for emergency responders. Therefore, Staff recommends Block 2 is reconfigured so that public alleys may be allowed & addressing can be from the adjacent public street – If Council does not support this recommendation, Staff alternately recommends the lots not fronting on a public street are addressed from the adjacent public street with directional signage provided at the public street, and private streets are not provided. Block 23 at the SEC of the development consists of rear-loaded SFR units on the west side and commercial uses on the east side. The UDC requires a minimum 25’ wide densely landscaped buffer to residential uses on the C-C zoned property; the Applicant is requesting Council approval of no buffer on the C-C property with the provision of a 15’ wide common mew lot on the residential portion, which will include landscaping and a sidewalk – an additional 10’ of landscaping is proposed in the front yard/setback of each residential lot, which totals 25’ between the front of the houses and the commercial property line. If Council is amendable to the Applicant’s request, Staff recommends the common area mew is increased to a minimum width of 20’ consistent with the linear open space standards & includes landscaping in accord with the standards for buffers to adjoining uses. Although Block 23 is in the MU-C designed area & a mix of uses are anticipated in this area, Staff is not supportive of the proposed layout with the residential units fronting on the parking lot for the commercial area with only a 15’ wide common area in between and no berm or wall as a buffer to shield the homes from vehicle headlights in the parking area. In accord with the mixed use & MU-C Concept Diagrams in the Comp Plan, Staff originally recommended a north/south public street be provided between the residential & commercial lots for addressing purposes for the east-facing residential units (which is an issue w/the proposed layout similar to that in Block 2) and the access drives for the residential units be constructed as alleys instead of named private streets as shown in the recommended layout on the right. This would provide on-street parking for guests and a transition/separation between land uses. Because this solution doesn’t meet ACHD’s off-set requirements for access points to a collector street, Staff recommends the residential lots/uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses and zoned C-C. There are several site constraints that effect the design and layout of this project, as follows: • The Carlson Lateral runs along the NW boundary of the site. • The Farr Lateral runs along the NE boundary of the site at the highest elevation of the project. • The McBirney Lateral will be piped and is located in the SE portion of the project. • The Watkins Drain runs through the NW quadrant. • The Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline bisects this site within a 75-foot wide easement. • There is an existing sewer trunk line on the NWC of the property in a 25’ wide easement. • There are slopes between 7 and 12% along the northeast boundary of the site within the area shown in red on the map. Due to these constraints, the Applicant requests a waiver from City Council to the maximum block face length standard of 750’ without an intersecting street or alley – block faces are allowed to extend up to 1,000’ where a pedestrian connection is proposed between streets within the block. The face of Block 12 along W. Precipice Dr. is approximately 2,500’ – (2) pedestrian connections are proposed within the block that provide pedestrian access between streets. The Farr Lateral runs along the north side of the street at the highest point of the development. The face of Block 12 along W. Vertex Dr. is approximately 1,500’. One (1) pedestrian connection is proposed within the block that provides pedestrian access between streets. Traffic calming is proposed in the form of a 29-foot wide street section for W. Precipice Dr. along the Farr Lateral, which will only allow parking on one side of the street, and bulb outs and choke points at pedestrian crossings as shown. A landscape plan was submitted with the preliminary plat that depicts street buffer and common open space landscaping for the development. A fencing plan was also submitted as shown. Multi-use pathways are proposed within the Williams pipeline easement and along Locust Grove Rd. A minimum of 15% (or 18.93-acres based on 126.2-acres of residential area) qualified open space is required to be provided in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts; a total of 36.1-acres (or 29.1%) is proposed at almost double the required amount. Site amenities totaling a minimum of 26 points from each category are required to be provided; amenities totaling 30 points are proposed consisting of (2) fitness courses, a dog park and (2) education gardens from the quality of life category; a swimming pool w/changing facilities & restrooms and (2) tot lots/natural play areas from the recreation activity category; 0.37 mile of pathway aligned with linear open space & 1.61 miles of multi-use pathways from the pedestrian or bicycle circulation system category; and a bicycle repair station from the multi-modal category. Several conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed residential development as shown. A mix of single-story & 2- story homes are proposed that include a variety of siding styles with masonry accents in a variety of colors and design elements/features with varying roof profiles and wall modulation that demonstrate the high quality of development proposed. No elevations were submitted for the commercial portion of the development. Commission Recommendation: Approval with the provisions recommended by Staff & changes requested by the Applicant and agreed upon by Staff as noted in Section IV of the staff report. Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Amanda McNutt and Jon Wardle, Brighton Corp. (Applicant’s Representatives) ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Julie Edwards, Melissa Fulkerson iv. Written testimony: Amanda McNutt, Brighton Corp. (Applicant’s Representative – response to the staff report) v. Key Issue(s): Request from the neighbors on Mary Ln. for trees to be provided within the buffer along the south side of the Farr Lateral from approximately Locust Grove Rd. to Margaret Ln. for screening purposes. The Applicant is amenable to providing trees in this location provided there is adequate area to do so outside of the Farr Lateral easement or through a license agreement with the Irrigation District. Opinion that people living in the residential units facing the commercial development in Block 23 would not want to look out their front windows into a parking lot. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: The requested waiver to block face standards in regard to both faces of Block 12 and the associated site constraints. The requested reduction of the buffer to residential uses on the commercial property in Block 23 and proposed design with the parking lot for the commercial uses abutting the residential property – generally not in favor of the proposed design. Concern pertaining to addressing for the lots that have frontage on a public street and are accessed off a named private street and confusion that may occur for emergency responders. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: At the recommendation of Staff, the Commission approved the Applicant’s request to remove the requirement for 10’ wide detached sidewalks to be provided along all collector streets in lieu of on-street bicycle lanes consistent with the 5-foot wide sidewalks constructed in the adjoining Apex developments (only 5-foot wide detached sidewalks are required by the UDC); modification to the condition (#A.3) requiring a revised landscape plan to be submitted to add that it shall be required with submittal of the final plat application; and modification to the condition (#A.9) requiring alternative compliance to the common driveway standards to allow (4) lots on side of the driveway in Block 12 to be submitted with the final plat application if requested. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: The Applicant requests Council approval of the following: o deletion of the requirement for a north-south public street to be provided between the residential & the commercial lots in Block 23. o deletion of the requirement for the revision to the lot layout in Block 2 to comply with ACHD's requirements for public alleys, which was required so that the lots only have frontage on one named street rather than two. o deletion of the requirement for a sidewalk to be provided on the north side of West Precipice Drive; this is a UDC standard that can't be waived. o A waiver to exceed the maximum block face allowed for Block 12 along W. Precipice Dr. and W. Vertex Dr. due to the previously noted site constraints. o A waiver to not provide a 25-foot wide buffer in the C-C district on Lots 1, 5 and 6, Block 23 to the abutting residential uses along the west boundary with the provision of a 15’ wide common area mew on the residential property, which will include landscaping and a sidewalk. As an alternative, Staff recommends residential lots/uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses. If Council does not feel the residential lots/uses should be removed and is supportive of the Applicant’s request for no buffer on the C-C zoned property, Staff recommends the common area mew is widened from 15’ to 20’ consistent with the minimum width for linear open space areas. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: memo from Jon Wardle, Brighton Corp., Applicant (response to the recommendation to Council), which includes an exhibit that illustrates the proposed design of the buffer between the residential & commercial uses in Block 23 and an exhibit that shows the proposed layout of Block 23 is consistent with the concept diagram in the Comp Plan for the MU-N designation. Staff would like to clarify (as noted by the Applicant) this property is within the MU-C, not the MU-N designation, which allows more intense commercial uses and necessitates more of transition & separation between land uses. The Mixed Use & MU-C concept diagrams in the Comp Plan depict a local or collector road as a transition and separation between SFR homes and higher density residential & commercial uses. The concept diagram for the MU-N designation transitions from SFR to higher density residential and then commercial uses. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2024-0014, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of October 8, 2024: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2024-0014, as presented during the hearing on October 8, 2024, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2024-0014 to the hearing date of _________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) Item #10: Blayden Subdivision (H-2023-0043) Application(s): Annexation, Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This property consists of 35.29-acres of land zoned RUT in Ada County and is located off the SWC of N. Black Cat Rd. & W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20-26. History: None Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: The northern 25-acres of land is Mixed Use – Regional (MU-R) & the southern 10-acres is Medium Density Residential (MDR). The Applicant requests to be allowed to use the abutting MU-R FLUM designation on 50% of the MDR designated area. The Comprehensive Plan allows for such requests when determined appropriate and approved as part of a public hearing with a land development application. The Applicant believes this extension of the MU-R designation on 5- of the 10- acres of MDR designated land will allow for an ideal and suitable mix of commercial near major transportation arterials. Summary of Request: The Applicant requests annexation of 38.58-acres of land with 5.9-acres of R-8, 1.83-acres of R-15, 16.71- acres of R-40 and 14.15-acres of C-G zoning for the development of 312 multi-family apartment units, 10 townhome units, and 4 commercial lots. A holding area is proposed on the southern part of the annexation area for future development – a portion of this area is where the Applicant requests the MU-R FLUM designation is extended with C-G zoning for future development of a mid-box retail building and an office park as shown on the revised concept plan. Staff recommends a change to the zoning in this area consistent with the revised concept plan. A preliminary plat is proposed for 15 building lots consisting of (1) multi-family lot, 10 townhouse lots and 4 commercial lots; 7 common lots; 1 driveway/parking lot; and 3 other lots for future re-subdivision & development consisting of 1 commercial and 2 SFR lots on 35.29-acres of land in the R-8, R-15, R-40 and C-G zoning districts. The subdivision is proposed to develop in 5 phases with the MFR rd development & townhomes in the first (2) phases, the commercial on the north side of Ramblin in the 3 phase, the commercial in the th holding area on the south side of Ramblin in the 4 phase and the SFR in the holding area in the last phase. In order to ensure some services are available for the proposed residents in this area prior to full build-out of the residential area, Staff had recommended a change to the phasing plan to swap Phases 2 and 3 – the applicant did submit a revised phasing plan, which swaps Phases 1 & 2 and includes the extension of Ramblin Dr. west to Rustic Oak but the commercial portion is still shown as Phase 3. All of the existing homes & accessory structures and access driveways to Chinden, Black Cat & Larry Ln. will be removed prior to development of the phase in which they’re located. Access is proposed via one (1) new collector street (Ramblin Dr.) in accord with the Master Street Map. Ramblin will run parallel with Chinden and is proposed to be extended west to Rustic Oak with the first phase of development – an emergency access is no longer needed via Chinden with the extension of Ramblin to Rustic Oak & should be removed. Ramblin will function as a backage road providing connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway in this area. ACHD is requiring a southbound right-turn lane on Black Cat at the Ramblin/Black Cat Rd. intersection. A traffic signal is planned at the Rustic Oak/Chinden intersection for safe access via the state highway. Cross-access/ingress-egress easements are required to be granted to the out-parcel at the NEC of the site for future access and interconnectivity. A 35’ wide street buffer is required along Chinden & Black Cat, both entryway corridors, and a 20’ buffer is required along Ramblin, landscaped in accord with UDC standards. Noise abatement in the form of a 4’ tall berm with a 6’ tall concrete modulated wall on top of the berm is proposed at the back edge of the street buffer along Chinden as required for residential uses adjoining a state highway. A 10’ wide detached multi-use pathway exists within the buffer along Chinden. A 10’ detached pathway is required within the buffer along Black Cat as proposed in accord with the Pathways Master Plan and a 10’ pathway is proposed along the collector street for pedestrian safety. The existing trees that will be removed from the site require mitigation in accord with UDC standards. Concept elevations were submitted for the proposed townhomes as shown. Concept plans were not submitted for the future commercial buildings. All structures, except SFR detached homes, are required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. A Conditional Use Permit is proposed for a multi-family development consisting of 312 dwelling units on 16.70-acres of land in the R-40 zoning district. A mix of 1- (72 units), 2- (180 units) and 3-bedroom (60 units) units are proposed in (16) 3-story structures. Three (3) different building floor plans are proposed, as follows: (4) Type A – containing a total of 30 units each; (4) Type B – containing a total of 24 units each; and (8) Type C – containing a total of 12 units each. As previously mentioned, the MFR development is proposed to be constructed in (2) phases – the UDC requires common open space to be provided in each phase of development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units. Two (2) driveway accesses via Ramblin are proposed along the southern boundary of the site; internal private streets are required to be provided for addressing purposes. Compliance with the specific use standards in the UDC for MFR developments is required, which include private open space, common open space, site amenities, parking, and landscaping among other things. A minimum of 80 s.f. of private usable open space is required for each unit; 82 s.f. is proposed, exceeding the standards. Based on the area of the site and the square footage of the proposed units, a minimum of 3.46-acres of common open space is required to be provided within the development; a total of 3.58- acres is proposed, exceeding the standard, consisting of ½ the street buffer along Chinden, a dog park, common area where a clubhouse, swimming pool & tot lot are proposed, and linear open space that meets & exceeds the minimum area standards. Staff recommended revisions to the site plan prior to the Council hearing for the common areas proposed along the southern boundary where the dog park, clubhouse & swimming pool and tot lot are located along the collector street to be relocated to a more central location within the development accessible by pathways for convenient access and for more visibility of these areas from the multi-family units in accord with open space & CPTED standards; however, the Applicant declined to make these changes and requests Council approval as submitted. The number of site amenities required for a development is based on the size/# of units in the MFR development. For developments with more than 100 units such as this, the decision-making body shall require additional amenities \[i.e. beyond the four (4) required for developments with 75 units or more\] commensurate to the size of the proposed development, with at least one (1) from each category (i.e. quality of life, open space, recreation, multi-modal). The following amenities are proposed from each of the following categories: 1) Quality of Life – clubhouse, which includes a fitness facility and dog wash station, and a dog park with waste station; Open Space – (4) community garden areas, plazas and a (5) picnic areas, including tables, benches, landscaping and a shade structure; Recreation – swimming pool, children’s play structure/tot lot, walking trails/pathways; and Multi-modal –bicycle repair station and enclosed bicycle storage in the clubhouse. Staff is of the opinion the proposed amenities meet and exceed the standards. Off-street parking is proposed in excess of UDC standards. A minimum of 679 spaces are required, including guest parking & covered spaces. A total of 693 spaces are proposed. Bicycle parking is also proposed for each building & the clubhouse in excess of the minimum standards. Conceptual elevations and perspective drawings of views from Chinden were submitted for the multi-family structures as shown. Commission Recommendation: Denial Summary of Commission Public Hearing: 1. Summary of Commission public hearing: a. In favor: David Bailey, Bailey Engineering b. In opposition: Wade Ramsey, Bainbridge Subdivision HOA President; Matt Neukom: Mark Blocovich; Kirsten Chidester; Don Brown; Greg Taylor c. Commenting: None d. Written testimony: Matt & Ashley Neukom and John Bartlett III & Vickie Bartlett; Brooke Neilson; Wade Ramsey, Bainbridge Subdivision HOA President; Stephanie Labastida e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. Opposed to the project based on the development requirements in the CC&R’s for Compton Sub. No. 2, which require minimum 1-acre lot sizes within the subdivision among other things; b. Opposed to the proposed multi-family development due to over-capacity of area schools and traffic flow in this area not able to accommodate so much housing; c. Concern pertaining to traffic cut-through through Bainbridge Sub. to the commercial uses to the east on Ten Mile Rd.; southbound traffic on Black Cat Rd. & congestion during peak hours – request for a traffic signal or a roundabout to alleviate congestion; concern pertaining to safety of children traveling to the nearby elementary school with construction of sidewalks on this property but no sidewalk along Black Cat Rd. for approximately 500’ in between the subject property and the school. The Bainbridge HOA Board, representing its homeowners, opposes this project until infrastructure improvements are made to accommodate the proposed development. d. Opposed to the development due to the negative impacts on the quality of life of residents in the Trilogy Sub. (to the east) due to increased traffic volumes and speeds and associated safety hazards for children who live in the area, noise, congestion and increased activity in the area. Preference for this area to develop with solely residential uses rather than mixed-use with commercial and desire for commercial uses to be provided further to the west. 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by Commission: a. Opinion that existing infrastructure (i.e. roads and schools) can’t accommodate the proposed development - Black Cat Rd. won’t be widened until 2036-2040 and the Black Cat/McMillan roundabout isn’t scheduled until 2028. b. Relocation of the common open space located along Ramblin Dr. where the dog park, clubhouse & swimming pool, and tot lot is located to a more central integrated location within the multi-family development as recommended by Staff. 4. Commission change(s) to Staff recommendation: a. The Commission recommended denial of the project due to the proposed density putting too much burden on current infrastructure and the site plan not supporting integrated common open space within the multi-family development. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. A revised phasing plan was submitted that swaps the two (2) phases (Phases 1 & 2) of the MFR development and includes the construction of Ramblin Dr. to the west to Rustic Oak – Staff had recommended that Phases 2 & 3 be swapped to ensure some services are available to serve the proposed residents in this area – as proposed, all of the MFR will develop prior to any of the commercial uses. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: Many letters of testimony have been received (see public record). Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2023-0043, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of October 8, 2024: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2023-0043, as presented during the hearing on October 8, 2024, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2023-0043 to the hearing date of _________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) h2 City Council MeetingOctober 8, 2024 Slide 1 h2 Agenda Item Numbers/Order: hoodc, 12/19/2006 ZoningAerialFLUM ZoningAerialFLUM ZoningAerialFLUM Block 2Block 23 There are several site constraints that effect the design in red There are slopes between 7 and 12% within the area shown foot wide easement. -corner of the property in a 25There is an existing sewer trunk line on the northwest foot wide easement.-within a 75The Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline bisects this site The Watkins Drain runs through the northwest quadrant.southeast portion of the project. The McBirney Lateral will be piped and is located in the the site at the highest elevation of the project. The Farr Lateral runs along the northeastern boundary of siteand layout of this project, as follows: ZoningAerialFLUM Annexation Area OriginalRevised w IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 (H-2024-0042) by Kyle Prewett, Toll Brothers, located at 5449 W. Daphne Dr. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0042 A. Request: Vacation to vacate a one (1) foot portion of the permanent easement for public utilities, pressure irrigation, and lot drainage encumbering the subject lot for Lot 3, Block 5 of the Oaks North Subdivision No. 5. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: October 8, 2024 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 7 PROJECT NAME: The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 (H-2024-0042) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 10/8/2024 Legend --- DATE: . Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council :=_Area of Impact �= City Limits FROM: Linda Ritter,Associate Planner 0 Analysis 208-884-5533 3 lritter@meridiancity.org jF APPLICANT: Kyle Prewett, Toll Brothers - SUBJECT: H-2024-0042 I L The Oaks North No. 5VAC --_-- ----- ---- LOCATION: 5449 W. Daphne Drive located in the --_ - --- ----- SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 and the SE '/4 of the SW 1/4 of SEC 28,TAN.,R.1W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Request to vacate a one (1)foot portion of the permanent easement for public utilities,pressure irrigation, and lot drainage encumbering the subject lot for Lot 3,Block 5 of the Oaks North Subdivision No. 5. B. Issues/Waivers None C. Recommendation Staff: Staff recommends approval of the partial vacation of the public utility easement as proposed by the Applicant and as agreed upon by the easement holders. D. Decision Select: Pending. City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview IL COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing/Proposed Zoning Residential/R-8 V.A.2 Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential V.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 8/20/2024 Neighborhood Meeting N/A Site posting date N/A Note: See section III. City/Agency Comments for comments received. City of Meridian I Department Report 11. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant requests approval to vacate a one(1) foot portion of the permanent easement for public utilities,pressure irrigation, and lot drainage encumbering the subject lot. The beforementioned easements have been re-established as a result of the approved Property Boundary Adjustment(PBA) and subsequent recording of a quitclaim deed,which formally established a new property boundary. The vacation of this portion of the easement will allow for the home already constructed on the subject lot to no longer be located in the subject easement. The lot originated when The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 final plat was recorded as instrument number 2021-042866 on March 16,2021. The lot was subsequently adjusted as a result of a PBA application(PBA-2023-0019),which was approved on March 29,2024. These lots are zoned in the R-8 (medium-density residential)zoning district. A legal description and exhibit map of the portion of the easement proposed to be vacated is included in Section V below. Relinquishment letters were received from CenturyLink,DBA Silver Star, Sparklight(former Cable One), Intermountain Gas, Settlers Irrigation District and Idaho Power for the portion of the easement proposed to be vacated. III. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS A. Relinquishment Letters See public record(copy the link into a separate browser) https://weblink.meridianciU.orgJ ebLink/DocView.aspx?id=361620&dbid=0&repo=MeridianC ky IV. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the partial vacation of the public utility easement as proposed by the Applicant and as agreed upon by the easement holders. B. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis � 1 wl - ' 1 A LAN� . a'• I + I L.pL41 -- f T_ �- �4�YY4_. •k - °�Iflll _ Z f f�,r„f ■ �Now EM�- =11 1 lilt !!!! M.N.uut A i r ♦ p111111 ��� � �. i f iiii■.. a :*: �rrrir� , !■lu � .a aw!11!r-- • it 111 �_,► / �:viann[rl l:• .i!!!! Ili iiii■i■....■unn:- ■■!■I I1i�C i!!iil�■� it !� r■■ ���. �/iii■i■■iiiii![�Illlm nlul ����11111■■' C *� iiifii■ ' +��� I1111l11 �iiii 111iii1 �iil� °..+ �1�11111■• ■ oil 111111 r.■a ltl I■ii111 ii 111 1 mill - Illllllllll 11 1111111 llllllllli 11111111111 r"1 IS Ilnllllil 111lllflli IIIIII 1111111111 p� IFNI" sllq�ny p IIIIIB Illlllllr• l= ==A C== 111=f 11111111 - -`I 1111 rlllll / Mail.rr r:=- [Iir'7ffff � �[lllllllll lllllll►� I I �f111 Ilill•1� nli-,;;_�� i •ii 11111 Ir1111I111i iiiii urir�l_'" i � ltrril111r ��iun■Hill�lunu Iri Innis r��;�_-l� ■ 1�■����pp illiiilllill _Ilnllnn uluu ul* ry111�� WE-�����``iiili =nnnnllllllll -Q r��i111ii1111fi IlilllrNglll CIA,RAN1 CC IS .. lilt rNi,r 111 -IA -QZryn u! i1I1! 1 - rrilrr!r rrn - e - r.__ �■�C�■ a H�-r�=`��� - - 11111�■= �►� rr l� -w rr��IQI�- ' -son � V= ' • - • • • - -- -- 1[[RR+. •�11 n1 n �9 pC•_■ ell!! 11111 IR■!l11;" II --.-�� fI_ Yrl rn �l! -. 1111l111111 IIIIIIIr' --��►►�ti I-=u n1 ■. - 10 !■f� f� /��q U1'4 1111111/11■ !t Ilrlllllllll 1111' !Il' r-- --�� /►1// �' �rl •� IIIIIulllll 11� i�� ��■+f� ���/— �+- ��'► .��,Q�- ♦ ����nuwl .r !! ruN■a ��+_ ,I■aa� • •-r• IIIlll► rll //,►7ri Il��,.r /� . i w-ri �Q;,�lIIIII! ■�I!! i ► !f Al Ill .��a.�� �1llllll!!■:�:::�����:::C r■!■!I Ill��s l!Il11� � �r !� r■■ ��.. �Illl■!■lllllllllulllu Iluua ��1�11111!■' - - ,.-'�- l!�1{R► �— _�IIIIUI I[uuu` ul Ilru !1!!![Il!#1111 1111 - uwmmunn - •*'■'■' �`'r ■ 11111!!/ IN .IIs1 ii' `�Illllllfrr� ■■ 111111111111: 1111111111111111 �� L =' ■-, �'"• [: 11'lIIIIIIi����/!#II 1111111 !lA1111!!_ iiiiiiiiiiii iii ==� 1 f!I i W° -• I Illlllllll 1•IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 11111111l111=`■�r^- 1 ' ��mml "°"� �IIIIIIIIIIl111��111111� ■11111 i�lllilllll!�+ u■Inlnuu p �111 -- -- - V� uL ml = ■. IIIIIIIIIIIII�� i ulll 1=����, Illllllllullll111111- -1111111111111111; L_ ■mEl 1lllln+ � f w NNIIII11111 : IIIIIIIIII �=mural mnnuT■ �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr 1�1Illllllllllllllllli�firnlln■nlln .nu 'III lll�t'1111u11111111111�!/y IIIIIIIIIUIl1111u11I//IIIInI111 a�� �; ; li Q S 111 Illllfl UIIIIIII ■11■ - III[ r Itl 11111111 111�Ilr' y� loll Ir, rl 1111111111l1 � Iiu:l:�-r=- -== 11If rlllp :'�pllllrr j i'li //!1«' • MINIM IIIIIl11►� 1111-w� ii �,r�>i+I. �i+ !�� rM �'�■!1! 1111tt1I11111111A!9111111 urirr 1 L«!!li•1, +'+ !►' 11 �-I11111111111-+IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIrI l�l;w_•�� I ��Ilf 1J11���sC -- ■t --1111!lIIIIII�_wrnun �ulllll► -'-__ -Il fl*1 t ��i> -�!1!1!1`Ilil!,-r p Illtlllllllllllll I �plll� \II Ir �i--= li ♦ Ilgr�._� -�11111111111■- Ilrlllllglll .�I--I --_w, ��1#III ,�IIIIII��_��1[Iy` �llllit II�Iw.p11/��a► f1111IIltlrlsiii i mini!C r lilll�hlr��re _�_ !ii Illlli:iu�l�r� ♦�����Va:-l- i/�1� ~ -�C 1~��i �w- 11111�11111� 111111l1'-all i.nllllll " lllnit��- ■� 'r RI Y r` R/l! •. . .. .Illll f1lNrlr � 1 ■ ■u �r �, 1 f�111f■!■ . -�e IIIr11i11111 Illr' rR► r- V '11111111! 111111111111 rr' r`i r liaa r ���lIIl11l���I!! _ _ r■■1111 IIIlll► 111 �♦ �� _ �� fa • . /i1 !■�■1■r= r�/r �11111111/� lllltll�!� �r a■ ! aR!1■ ■ �IRII[R[ !!!!,r _ I/� Ill � r 1111!■�`�■noun��:I: � !■!!I I!! r!lttlll � ■ !Illllfl■....allllra�:■ ate♦ i,-Z'IIIIINII�Illll � ~ �r i# 1� I ■i !!!■!■!!!1!lllBilllllll 11111■ ltrm.nr a����l�'�11!■ Iloilos 11/111111 IAII flnw Iuuulr �s; 111umul iuln nl!!![ ��■urlr - •"'• •'°��'� 11111lp � Q=unuuunnlm�/ -L rn■ 6'► ' . . 1111111111111111 —— '� la .11■. ■� � +111111l�r .. IIIIIIIIIII!.- �p e e a�= `■■- � unnnmin° �- - -- PAlll 11 W -, ll'1fI11tli H!f 1111111 lfII1Il!!: mmllunnu —� =- = �IIIIIIIIIIl1I IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII 11l11lIIIIIII■ - ............ e 0 ilkM °01= '�lIIIIIIlllflll��llllll- �IIIIIIl111111111!� 11■ulllmu;._ fll h' (]� IIIII 8 1 w- IIIlll lllll ' III Illllfl w �� _I,,,,,1, ,,,,,„- -lllllllullllll Illlli� �S IIIlll IIIIIIIIII■� Nlnnunl�:�.I Inunnn �• ' ��munl nnnuii ,Illlllllllllllllllllr llllIIIlll!lll11111I�91!IIp111111111si''''''���������-' anll '��i fl Il�s Illll .Illnil111l111l1i1ri11�1I IIIIIIIIIUI11111B11t• Ulllllnl i1�7� _ _ �II�_;- — *' �i - ` =I y �� 1111 11111111111111 1111111111111111111lIININ fl =? = lj 1111� ulurll ullllll[�I ■11�-___ i_�- "" C 1 11111111111 o IlRllfllnm!!nn= _ E w III[i r 111[' 11111111 111 Ir -_ r- �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-■„, =�wp_ - ���. ='��� llllllllllll- = r _ llll�r rt 111111111i1 \► ■Ili wME ll r I r�a� :Ifll +Sj1/7f/t' f1l1 llillil� lllpll IIl11111��_ r' __T - r •i!~r i:111t/r �� �!t 1t11111111111111rf IIIIIf171f1 - -- lrll-=*:=-; a •,■ l r##/ - III-2IIIII . ♦ e1llllll 11111111 IIIlll •••-- urirl �"'•-•.;;• ,_ lA, I■ �r It11t111IIIIIII Illlllnlltl ■IIIIu��nnm 11r;�=�fi l,`I� rr � 11111■ulll - r Vln�_-_-_- I � --- w- h11111111111111Id �I�IIIIIglllll�II Ill! -��IIIIl1`IIlII = ululllllll[[ I .i�i I z - - �n1a � --�IIIIIIIIIII■�u1m11,1111 ,- � i,M�.. �w rlr� �f111111�' rl����11 III irle+� 1- '�yq -rr rr rr Q rlrrfr1�rlri== �- �w—rr rr -� ♦; �lrrr►f s rinlll rlm ■!h -� �" ��_ fir a+� 111 u�lrrr� inlii �11�1!�:it 1llilfll`l�jh1� B. Subject Site Photos F r-. 1 -AL ti4 R 1 k r t �` City of Meridian Department Report V. Exhibits C. Site Plan(date: 11/23/2023) VACATION OF A PORTION OF EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY, PRESSURE IRRIGATION AND LOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 3, BLOCK 25, THE OAKS NORTH SUBDIVISION NO. 3 LOCATED IN THE SW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 28,T4N, R1W. BM, CITY OF MERIDIAN,A❑A COUNTY, I❑AHO BASIS OF BEARING S89'22'25'E 1.40' s 9'22'25'E 55.04' POINT OF � y-- 589'22'257 IAO' BEGINNING _-- _---J I ---��_± _4�-------.. d —- II f I I I I , I , I PARCEL A PARCEL B A PORTION OF LOT 4, f LOCX 25 LOT 3 ANQ A PORTION OF � LOT 4, BLOCK 25 0 I , � I LO is ry LsJI ` I/" KDiaUPCRTIOPI TO BE I V14CATED • j / I I A6jUSTE04 a I i I I BOUNDARY ` ' MGINAL FLATIE) I UHE I YiESTERLY BOUNONRY LINE OF LOT 3 ! BLOM 25 i i I EiU5T1NC PUBUC UTILITY. PRESSURE IRMATION AND LOT URAINACE ,a IEASD"T UNE PER PLAT OF THE I i OAKS NORTH SUBUMSICIN 5' I� I I LL_ __—,,,--___________�,____. 1 �.flo I N89'22'25"W 54_Qp' N89 22'25'W N88 22'25"W 56.00' 1�op,LI.Ajyal� THE OAKS NORTH SUBDIVISION NO, 5 4 }Tr M 120, PGS 18723-18725 01 10 20' 40' c) ,A Laindliblutions Tp fiend Surveying and Consutling {. } OF 231E STH 6T.UTEA cc)l W. MERID".0 83i,V 12PEI ZE&3C40 {2pE}?17725571at u'+Y.'.lan�uns b¢ City of Meridian Department Report V. Exhibits D. Legal Description (date: 11/23/2023) Legal description The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5 Publicv Utility, Pressure Irrigation and Lot Drainage Easement Partial Vacation —Lot 3, Block 25 A portion of an easement in Lot 31 Block 25 of The Oaks North Subdivision No. 5, as shown in Bank 120 of Plats on Pages 18723 through 18725, records of Ada County, Idaho, being located in the SW % of the SE 14 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West. Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a 112 inch diameter iron pin monument marking the northwesterly corner of said Lot 3, from which a 112 inch diameter iron pin monument marking the northeasterly corner of said Lot 3 bears S 89'22'25" E a distance of 55-00 feet; Thence along the northerly boundary of said Lot 3 S 89122'25" E a distance of 5.00 feet to a point; Thence leaving said northerly boundary S 0'37'35"W a distance of 15-00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing S 0'37'35"W a distance of 96.50 feet to a point; Thence N 89'22'25"W a distance of 1,00 feet to a point; Thence N 0"37'35" E a distance of 96.50 feet to a paint; Thence S 89'22'25'E a distance of 1.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 96.50 square feet(0,002 acres), rrtore or less, �gahL LA Np Clinton W. Hansen, PLS ` A p Land Solutions, PC `� November 14,2023 11118 �+V W. LAII r .l bUitiorrs 06 lil N0 S R 1 Eaeemw e+�t+1�cac ptwn Parcel Job No 18.35 Page 1 4r I City of Meridian I Department Report V. Exhibits W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Bradshaw Corner Subdivsion (SHP-2024-0003) by Focus Engineering and Surveying, located at 735 W. Cherry Ln. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/SHP-2024-0003 A. Request: Short Plat consisting of two (2) building lots on 0.508 acre(s) of land in the R-4 zoning district. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: October 8, 2024 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 8 PROJECT NAME: Bradshaw Corner Subdivision (SHP-2024-0003) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name q0 A d`5�^�� 2 Slft� 3 /tA) Ak I((AA V—te 5 �0 u I TQ V 1� 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,,--, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 10/8/2024 Legend DATE: Project Location TO: Mayor&City Council Area of Impact ,\ }= City Limits �. FROM: Nick Napoli,Associate Planner O Analysis 208-884-5533 t]T, nnapoli@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Dennis Jordan SUBJECT: SHP-2024-0003 F . - Bradshaw Corner Short Plat I LOCATION: Located at 735 W. Cherry Lane in part of m the NE corner of Section 12, T.3N., R.1 W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary Short plat to subdivide an existing parcel consisting of.508 acre of land, into two(2)building lots in the R-4 zoning district. B. Recommendation Staff: Approval with conditions C. Decision Select: Pending. City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview IL COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Residential - Proposed Land Use(s) Residential - Existing/Proposed Zoning R-4/R-4 V.A.2 Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential(MDR) V.A.3 Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date Thursday,June 6,2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District III.0 • Comments Received Yes - • Commission Action Required No - • Access Accessed via common drive off of NW 8'Street - ITD Comments Received No - Meridian Public Works Wastewater Distance to Mainline: Available at site;Impacts or III.13 Concerns:No Meridian Public Works Water Distance to Mainline: Available at site;Impacts or III.13 Concerns: no See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section for all department/agency comments received or see public record: (https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=353052&dbid=0&repo=MeridianQU) City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. General Overview The short plat proposes to subdivide property consisting of 0.508 acres of land, into two (2)building lots in the R-4 zoning district. The proposed density of 4 units per acre is consistent with the density desired of 3 to 8 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Density Residential Future Land Use Map designation for this site. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History N/A Residential Units 2 Single Famil Homes Acreage .508 acre Lots 2 Buildable Lots Density 4 units/acre B. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There is an existing single-family home that will remain on Lot 1 and will be accessed via a new driveway wrapping around the north side of the existing building. 2. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): Future development of the proposed lots should comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-4 zoning district. C. Design Standards Analysis 1. Existing structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): There is an existing home that is proposed to stay on Lot 1 and one(1)accessory structure on the property that is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Both structures currently comply with the setback standards in UDC 11-2A-5. However,the accessory structure will need to be converted into a dwelling unit with adequate parking or be removed from Lot 2 before the City Engineer's Signature. 2. Landscaping (UDC 11-3B): i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to Cherry Lane, an arterial street, and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required adjacent to 8tn Street, collector street. This buffer should be landscaped per the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C. The landscape plan shall be revised to extend the landscape buffer south of the shared driveway. Additionally, the landscape plan shall be revised to include boulders or decorative wall/permeable hardscape materials. ii. Tree preservation A Tree Mitigation Plan should be submitted with the final plat signature application detailing all existing trees and methods of mitigation outlined by the City Arborist before any trees are to be removed as set forth in UDC 11-3B-1OC.5. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 3. Parking (UDC 11-3C): i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. The applicant is proposing a new garage for the existing residence to meet this standard. Staff will confirm compliance with these standards at the time of building permit submittal for each residence. D. Transportation Analysis 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access to this property is provided via NW 8'Street, an existing collector street. There is a cross access easement along the west portion of Lot 2 to allow Lot 1 access to the drive serving the site. E. Services Analysis 1. Pressurized Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 2. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. 3. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required and are available to be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21 and Goals 3.03.03G& 3.03.03F.Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are required to be provided with development of the subdivision. III. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. If the City Engineer's signature has not been obtained within two(2)years of the City Council's approval of the short plat,the short plat shall become null and void unless a time extension is obtained,per UDC 11-6B-7. 2. The short plat and landscape plan prepared by Evan J. Wood, on 08/23/2024, included in Section VI.A, shall be revised as follows: - The 20-foot landscape buffer along NW 8t1i Street shall be extended on the south side of the existing driveway. - Graphically depict public utility, drainage, and irrigation easements along all property boundaries. - Graphically depict the landscape buffer easements along NW. 8t'Street(20 feet)and W. Cherry Lane (25 feet). - Shorten the easement for cross access to encompass the existing driveway width and add a note regarding maintenance of this easement/driveway. - Revise the landscape plan to include boulders or decorative wall/permeable hardscape materials. City of Meridian Department Report III. City/Agency Comments &Conditions Prior to signature on the plat,the applicant shall submit a new residential building for Lot 2,Block 1 to convert the existing detached garage to single family dwelling OR remove it. - Prior to signature on the plat,the applicant shall provide an updated common drive exhibit showing setbacks, fencing,building envelope,and orientation of the lots and structures. 3. Future development shall comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table H- 2A-5 for the R-4 zoning district and the common driveway exhibit in Section VI. 4. Staff s failure to cite specific ordinance provisions or conditions from the previous approvals noted above does not relieve the Applicant of responsibility for compliance. City of Meridian I Department Report III. City/Agency Comments &Conditions B. Meridian Public Works SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS= 1. Rectum Far new Water Service connection andfor any changes to the existing services will need to be submitted For review and approval by Land Developmem_ GENERAL CONDITIONS: I. Sanitary sewer service to this devel0pmet3t is Milabk Via extension of existing mains adjacent to the developmem_ Water service to this site is available via extension of existing mains adjacent to the development_ 2. All in,prowmcuts related to public life,safety and hcaltb shall be completed prior to occupancy of the siruciures, 9iWhere approved by the City Engineer,an owner may post a performance surety for such tmprovaments in order to obtain City Engineer signature on the final plat as set forth in UDC 11.5C-33_ 3_ T)pon insm1laiion of r$e landscaping and prior to inspection by planning Departmcmt staff, the applicant shall provide a written ccrtificatc ofcomplction as set forth in UDC l 1-3 �-14A. 4_ A letter of credit or cash surety in the amount of I I OV.will be required far all incomplete fencing, landscaping,arnenitics,pressurizi!,d irrigaian,prior to signature on the Final plat. 5. The City of Meridian requires that the owner post with the City a perfbr matnce surety in the amount of 123%of(he total construction cost for all incomplete sewer, water infrastructure prior to final plat signature.This surmy mill be verified by a line item omi estimate provided by the owner io the City. The applicant shall be required to enter into a Development 5ureiy Agreement with the City of MLridian.The survty can be prnied in the form of an irrrYQcablc letter of credit,cash deposit or bond. Applicant must Filc an application for surety. which can be found on the Community Dcw-clopnicni Dcparl runt wcbsitc.Please contact Land Development Service for more information Lit 6_ The City of Meridian rrquires that the owner post to the City a warran ty surety in the amount of ZWo of the total 4"m5j coon cost for all completed sewn,and water infrastructure for a duration of two}cars.This surety amount will be vcriFcd by a line item final cosi invoicing provided by the owner to the City. The surety can be posted in the fonn of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash deposit or bond_ Applicant must Fite an application for surety, which cat, be found on the Community Development Department websile. Please oontact Land Developmeni Service far mime information at 887-22 1 1. 7_ In(be event that an applicant and/or owner cannot complete non-life, non-safety and non-health improvements,prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat andtor Prix to mcupancy,a surety agreement may be approved as set forth in UDC I 1-3C-3C. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that all develapmcnt features comply with the Americans wish Disabilidea Act and the Fair housing Act_ 9. Applicant shall bo responsible for applicaiion and compliance with any Section 404 Permitiing that may b1c required by the Arnry Carps of Ln�inccrs. 10. Developer shall coordinate ivaiibox locations with tlic Meridian Poet Office. 11_ A]l grading of the site shall be performed in conformance with MCC I I.1.413. l2. Compaction test results shall be submiucd to the Mcridian Ruilding Department for all building pads receiving engineered backfil I,where Boling would sit atop fil l material_ 13_ The g pplkftus desiVi engineer shall be frspbnsible for inspmtinn of all irrigation an41CW drainAgc facility within this project that do not fall under the jurisdiction of an irrigatian district or ACHD. City of Meridian Department Report III. City/Agency Comments &Conditions The design engineer sltal I prov ide certification that the facilities have been installed in accordance with the approved design plans_This certification will be required before a certificate of occupancy is irsued for any ytruetW is within the p60jr10t- 14_ At the completion of the project, the applicant shal l be responsible to submit record drawings per the City of Meridian AutoCAD standards_ These record drawings must be received and approved prior to the issuance of a certification of occupancy for any strttctums within the project. 15, Strcrt light plan rcquircmcnts arc listed in section 6-7 of the Improvemcnt Standards for Street Lighting fhttplJwwv. mcridiancitg,orglpublic_worl€s.aspx?id=2?2)_ All street lights shall be installed at developer's expense_ Final dtisigu shall be submitted as part of the development plan set for approval, which must include the location of any existing street lights_ The oaniraetor's work and materials shall conform to Lhr ISPV4'C snd the City bf Meridian Suppivrnumal Sprcificaticns to the ISPWC.Conturt the City of Meridian Trampgrtmien and Utility C wndinatar at M98-5500 for information on the locations of existing street lighting. 16_ The applicant shalt provide easements)for all public waterfsewer mains outside of public right of way (include all water Services and hydrants)_ The easemcmt widths Shall be 21)--fem wide for a Slagle utility,pr 310-feet wide Fpr two- The rawment:S shall not be dedicated via the plftt,buL=LhLT dedicated outside the plat process using the-City of Meridian's standard Forms.The casement shall be graphically depicted on the plat for reference purposes_ Submit an executed casement(on the form available from Public Works),a legal description prepared by an Idaho Licensed Professional Land Surveyor,which must include the area of the easement(marked EXHIBIT A)and an 8 UT'x 11" map with bearings and d4cmn�:Ls (marked EXHIBIT B) for review_ Both exhihitS must be scaled,signed find dnuvd by a Professional Lsvtd Sur%*yi r, DO NOT RECORD_ Add a not*to Lhe plat referencing this dmurnent. All casements must be submitted,Tcvicwcd,and approved prior to signature of the final plat by the City Engi n:er. 17_ 'Applicant shall be rrspbnsiblr frr applitatiM and eotrtpliance with and NPDES permitting thst may be,required by the E.nvironmcmtal Protection Agraty_ 18- The City of Meridian requires that pressurized irrigation systems be supplied by a year-round source of water(UDC 11-3B-6.)_The applicant should be required to use any exisiing surface or well water for the primary source_ If a surface or well source is not available, a single-point Connection to thr culinary waver system shall be vnquimd_If single-plaint connrrLion is wilizod, the developer will be responsible For the payment of assessments fcr the common areas prior to development plan approval. 19_ All irrigation ditches, canals, laterals, or drains, exclusive of natural waterways, interseetlrLZ ergSsingor laying 0jF1CCnt and oantiSuous to the area being subdivided shall he addressed per UDC I 1-M-6, In performing such work, the applicant shall comply with Idaho{'ode 42-1207 and any other applicable law oT rcgulalion. City of Meridian Department Report III. City/Agency Comments &Conditions C. Ada County Highway District(ACHD) Alaxis Pickering,Prasiderrt �CHD Mlran� ll 6 Ga ,con Peesr Jim Hansen,Commissiovennar Kent Goldthorpe,GommissiGner Dave McNnncy,Gorrxniw;moncr July 23, 2024 Ta; Dennis Jordan, via email Focus Engineering&Surveying 1001 N Rosario Sftla4 Meridian, IQ 83642 Subject; MPP24-00 I NSHP-2024-0003 735 4N Cherry Lane Bradshaw Subdivision This is a staff level approval of a preliminary plat for Bradshaw Subdivision, The Ada County Highway District has reviewed the submitted application for the preliminary plat referenced above and has determined that there are no improvements required to the adjacent streets. The proposed preliminary plat is approved without conditions. The existing local ion of the 23-foot wide paved curb-cut type drlaeway 195-feet south of Cherry Lane should remain as is. The existing driveway is located directly outside of the influence area of the intersection of Cherry Lane and 86 Street but does not meet District Policy 7206.4.3 which requires full- movement driveways to be located either outside of the area of influence of an inharsection or 440-feet from an intersection,whichever is greater. Dug to the site's limited frontage on r Street(165-ftial),the existing driveway has been placed as far from the intersection as feasibly possible. Relocation of the driveway would further deviate from AHD policy, The applicant will be required to pay all applicable platting and review fees prior to final approval_ If you have any questions, please conlwA me at(208)387-6391_ Sincerely, yr,&Lj J'P { KaraLeigh Troyer Planner Development Services cc: City of Meridian (Nick Napoli),via email Alan Bradshaw, via 9mail IV. FINDINGS A. Short Plat In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: City of Meridian I Department Report IV. Findings 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Comprehensive Plan designates the future land use of this property as Medium Density Residential, the current zoning district of the site is R-4. Staff finds the proposed short plat complies with the short plat standards listed in UDC 11-6B-5. The proposed development complies with the dimensional standards of the R-4 zoning district listed in UDC Table 11-2A- 5. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; Staff finds that public services will be provided and are adequate to serve the proposed lots. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; Stafffinds all required utilities will be provided with lot development at the developer's expense. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; Staff finds that the development will not require major expenditures for providing supporting services as services are already being provided in this area. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and Staff finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. Staff is not aware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features associated with short platting the structure on this site. IV. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed short plat with the conditions noted in Section VII of this report and in accord with the findings in Section VIII. B. Commission: Pending C. City Council: Action Pending. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. Action ' � 1 Who LuuLj IW i yi.J UJI CJI 1 ' 4 1 i ♦41 r CHERRYFLI �I = l FAIRYIEW VIA �"�r .�+5�.-spy-'�4�,`a + i S r i •' � .�'s��*� ■ r ■r 1'1 un =IIy111111•In111 IlIn11r f+A3mu`n i e - - �:■lr■■!■ ■ 1 11� r rr i Ii i■ii■i��I r_fA• 111 • 11u1111rt lA1rr:� sms , • ■■■lll■r■■�R/111AAA111 r1111110111�r1111■1•II 1:m u■ num u■■■..._ nrr■a■u■ ion■ Il■IIIu1 -• • •• ■:■■■q■ �.- rals.r■ 7lIAi 111111 i qua��.- _c �- i�A' 1��- 11111 11■ in Is . , • SIN .■r= mu■L= ii r. 11 11 -_ - rr■ 11 In■■•11~nl■■■■■■■■■i 1•Ia f ■ � ` :�:-I ■R -�i • r .r+�u■■.■y Ilion nu■r1 rir f � Gil o GIs• 1� ■I All!Yu Nyw r■■r■r■Y a■u! n_- s IIIl1- \i.■ Si► y + 111 ■!■■■Ill rw r:■s■!■!! r� ■■rlu! i ■s■r-• yl \ i■u■ ■■r flrlll■ ■� 1 � �• VI■1 9��u■■A ■!rt■■N r ■m qnm_u■a■■sf,larlrunnu ., �.■� xn1►M_ 1Al�nnuw t •�>s -Iup2■■r�'•liiii :CPnm■� I��unlrlxlell, 1 ���%�. w�� IIIII ■1■■ sirs �i d 11 r'_e •• ■.ll�uurnu■llA ■�■i■ I � '�� :i���•v■•purr :�0IN ::■ 1 � • Irk • ♦S■►■r■■INmen ■ - Somme Ir:fin rl�� ■ Zu CHERRY FAIRYIEW !iri4 ►�•■�p ors ■ � ■ iri::: 1 na Ind i%" iw': = , 1 IN IN ■■!!■ems irrr■ �i Q�1■q \�■A' ■ p�i � _ =irlq i� Iiiiiii�■'r�liilii liui--Iii f ��" "Si • nun■■■ 11E�'*i ■lam nnmti�iumn WI�, Illl i/11- ■ �IIIL• ■.■■ ■ fllilr�■•r un■■■r ■ ' rr nm IS ■anon•■ ��! r. .flu■ ri':- ii: Z .. ■nm r■■ S r slipss p �Ir li i FI � ■■� �■..run■r■■ur a■■r■■iiiM ■� 11-1■■ I jarRUT rrrll. 1■■111••1■r11L :',�1111111 ■■E: S. •.■.■ Z lu InnS. - ■ �•��1�f. ■rift ��i■ri Olfo a lu IN IMP �. , + - '■ 11111 - _■-. ■■rbig • Q li lll� CIF. .■■ ...■::1,. PINE Lu �9• �i CI■ i1'I �'' am■f��•I/IluAllllllll\r�i uu► '1 M" . 1 I■r,.rr„�1� Of\ :�� /l a■■ RRR mwl�r e��♦i.�\� } _ 1=_ ♦ .� / ■■ ■Inn ti rRlq!!lI111n111 B ���■! -'llll U r nm■S • 1w=ru:0 9♦i♦ ._:IIr`I11� a � ■! ��D �r� • • • • Iriuun bon r[amir :rulrrrnunnn•� mor w• �. Z• ILiurullr nnnlnll • ■r an in IN w.no uogj = ■ff-I NO we!Q�'d ••a• :-�r11111 I e .non■■ In.i ■ion■r nu! as Ai � Wq� ■ �C C .r tea' ■nn■■ ♦Iriu■rrX■RlHIP■■nu■1i �aaiif `\r _ n C ��li■ •...►O asw rat = urr.■d r • • r■■■..•• ■ ,�■■�� •��►jM w aia■....aaaasli ■r■O' r:.ii iiu�C:-i:in ■E\TZt►rr'�♦raa]�l�il rr ■�i i'C. �In ■ ■ tuna ■not■■ . ` ; •�••■ err �rwr��u�a/,■.nu1■�M■■r �a��`u ■�ii�ii i a o.■si��iLlouru[ ya/lrl�all uuur_ 1H�nnun.l �+ ►fir+ m 8. �� .n/r: =a■ ■�■ ■!■in:� !l111 ■tort■ e ■•■■•�1■■ y ri`i•.� wLuluuu.uu _n� �■:1...n■r fir'+ i _ '�!� "ia�w a■■uj/r1v.l[r11 = n`ti��::1■Ivri::. •44 Ir■.1-.-/.IMF— noun in■i�l/■ +1 CHERRY ■ FAIRYIEW-t 7 *♦ '.■nr■.■ �.i `rr11♦r..�►fi rii.rrrr..11■n solilt',- I.,��■i,.* . a.■I r 1q !a■s r ■r■r nn■ aoru Density milli nunynlu■. ■ ■�71r■11aq1r p/ in: � "::::n■run■:: ■■■■r1I ��C u■■■i , _. %iru ■.■ l�AilJ3 ■► �... ■...a.n[lrs r■rrirr.rr +� -� ■■ .im. .■■ulrnruti :,:■llnuulr■■■. �. w - PINE ■■= II ..Billion p�m1 � Alm I r� i p�1�♦ ♦ ♦ � n�. 'n w _ .A 111 ♦ ♦♦ �1 - - e �1 la.♦* Nils 1■.■ G�1 IlC��":Ilil'11= - 11111 ill!!IL,'♦ K'Ay ' �- �ar.nA♦1il!llIn114!! ' • Llulnr.� 1II0I1II®ll���-:�� m II -11110 - •• . i .■�� I ■r a naa ul�i-��:. ■ �:_ ■ ���♦/���■ un■1 I1rIB011ugrrq IBrrr 1P -�_�i■■�� 1�^ III • fir♦ ��!un■.�1lUnuuurnrr,� m Z �li ��� �i r ♦ ..rm.....■III wssl��"monsoon .'; I: l ;r a F�1 a .•♦:�+=is�1'` ►lmnns nnnnu i uu Q .i' =innln la P Z unun.nc;'i■■■■■■■— ■r■run■.I� 1:;,1 jlinluar.n � a+l ■•- ■P w■■ ■11111i Illrlirllr� . ara J : ■a ■:.- -'e p: ♦ r�rr•ata. � am unun�.■■■V' 1 _ Gil■. Iolry-_ ■■■ ■■4i r as• :.:--�r11111 I ..a10 R♦/a4 � w�■O:./rills ■ • . Al■ r►. �,�.i uu.rr.`!�r.nul■ !i •■■■.�:�+ y11a1•• ■ ' • .�..Or1!aw■w■■■llllr� � .noun .■■■.• .oil,■ near .� ■L■ 1 I!■►�■inn Nrnry 4nnlinl nnr n= run.gnplu ■■unlit/ .■1n1.1..! r w i \=71■!r "'■ !�lnn0r ■ , ���I1111111111Nr1� �1 •.�■ „C:■ tort.■■r.■ ::■v ■C■■P71■d � ..-= ♦ ��M y y ..lfiuu■nuri.R � r■���■��o ■■I - ■ "Zr■ajpinau nor€ Irk:■ ■■■ yid ��_ l—- ��■1.nn■■ p sm so noon.. ■.■�■IaM• r.: CHERRY :•���:���■I�nsir` � 1■ I W.FAI�RYI�EW *� yy�.■ r�pl � t � � � L. iD V■■n■.w1�. `nn :u■� ��. rfr r11 .Si r_i inn ■�� �.. itlo. Inns�:nnA ■■a4 r inn — inL.O ■■inrl.B.Bi 1 tar .0 iar \■�'a+ ww Ci :■ r ■■7oq .� .nu.i��nn.l.r1■ rl nl!'��unl • G i i7 w■••...���7, IP ■ .rum uinn ■ u. not Ir Sr Iu..■■■■ nG iBrun ■■ li a. \ In u111��ln...rP■i �ON a1♦,il �r:�..I.•• : �� _� r . ■ .r .. ......l.n.n.: ■■■■tIR �um. �nNE some ml.r.n s .lug ��II��• :.ii m ■r� 1 �ua, ..��n■..n o �■■■■ <!� /� NE I... ■nn �run V. ■■■■.■.■■■n a■nnrnr■i.■ '� oil!^ Bllll 1L----■. rinrrrin. 1 ii uumu �■ umuuu■■■. ■-. ■. ■,�1, O�■■n pr .�.iN q��� ;uur!■o ate' . tllllll! Ills In.. 111l1 �tl1 OBr r a: �^ 19111 III w^'i!}i i11i1 1■rl■_. ■•n.[■!In �� ■ � w■ a ■■ �pun.ruu 'lllllll ill! rill Illq: '11■ 'ul1 ■ �1., I'f°����� n .Ira onus _ tl 11 ..rglllr .i ll■�� r! Illlrll :Ih: Irllll IIEIi 111111 �1111 rll nr PINE .r111111 n,l ■ Brrr■ vigil ■AIlil.I IIIIIN`}I- j mililirin�'7 � ! � _ gin n�■ r. i �� Rj ♦�1��..�i ` ��; 1 I • rf=mlr rrIl111IinABilrl IF ■ i�C �Il�. :dllill ■�711111 IlEll molllllI I ♦4 ♦ ♦♦ ��1�; .!.'_ q n Ir oil ♦ ♦♦ ♦� Q�I I ��� r ' JRin,��11111Ln 1111■' "'oil��- �l� _!1: loll, 11111 lilt!IInL �■■ f u ullpi i.■ Ill:1:il�llll 11�_ rBt1 `elEll r� illlll Rlfll IIIR • ♦ ♦a?i r►�9 fn r ■11'7 r �■,.i i1Tllrn l p C I .rnu�11■11..1111111\�/i I. •�■■1i �` �IIfil�lli�ll�ll 1�1 r:-�r III■ '� � i, B. Subject Site Photos �a N MTh st ti City -f of MeridianDepartment Re 11Exhibits ww t4'N' y ti F, t rk••i� t City - ti^ of MeridianDepartment Re 11Exhibits s f. C700 I� DepartmentCity of Meridian po C. Service Accessibility Report Location In City Limits GREEN Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains � 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or > % a s GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time 5-9 min. YELL01-1! Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1/4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Not within 1/4 of current or future transit route RED Arterial Road Buildcut Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master streets GREEN plan) matches existing (# of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 112 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a Schaal Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Park Wa I ka bility No park with!n walking distance by park type RED City of Meridian I Department Report V. Exhibits A Site Plan (date: 5/31/2024) ------------------ -------------- JF)l 04 Q------------------ 0 LQ F --- -------- L-------------- SEE PLAN City of Meridian Department Report V. Exhibits E. Landscape Plan(date: 8/23/2024) CEIE2KY LANE pGnr:q{,tym.2 d 305rtr�f�NnKa[ nirt[IY IrN[ TFI • �——— ..� _ PLAXI 9LlCGIAE yy- I I (99151L �;.I.: 'p[}Y•T • _ _ ,_• � •!•vl Y� _ _ �J w ._�..... w...� .w I I FF FN.i:✓- .R '!I .,L31€},eA,4" VI GB D •3. }•�A. r� �ur�r �`[- .T.�...�...`.r�iw p x /I L31� I ar111xG rK'a ecssacyrr umcc rr ■IIF ! I I C.] • �4r� �� W [�156 �"•• y I® FUTEREACE XOIES 9CHEWLE - U Z �Ir ,{ I �=:;emu mur[nru uvmwnr __—'�'� nraanwun x .�i VUi Lg1 VC.S : :•.;~ena I 1'� `arhfer: r wrtz [ t SIING UIUwNnT � rIIxG x [u uSfaP I I.l.l1'••• City of Meridian Department Report V. Exhibits F. Preliminary Plat(date: 5/6/2024) UXIEND FI NAL PLA"I' BRADSHAW CORNER 1111YNC11113 N[Ili1'll,IfANL:C 1`W CCl',![IINC MCI11111AN', -_- O ..i.P e.......e....w....w M-1 DIAN.AAA L:V CNl'Y.I PAII V 2C,A SURVEYOR'S SIR RIIA7IVP. -TT`--'— rrurssa •�...n...�..-. ------------ x1— -------- Y(RYS 1 I.I Ia-.v.l.wr ae I — nwumuc I rr rrwr�ax ulxxa rxxc„nllxnMera,z ILI, _J } I f � r L---JJ ------- ° I xrnwlx n.0 r. ,x,u.,,xn M.x,„nu.«I.«,Im r• ---7 Jf Mowry rn r�xuiuirm V. ii H51'lll['tii.R I.I: I w 11 F. Mr,rM,�•Nx I I *, us City of Meridian Department Report V. Exhibits W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing for Apex Farr Subdivision (H-2024-0014) by Brighton Corporation, located at west side of S. Locust Grove Rd., north of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and east of S. Meridian Rd. Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2024-0014 A. Request: Modified Development Agreement to remove the property annexed with South Meridian Arbor Ridge (H-2015-0019), Inst.#2016-007071 and portions of the property annexed with Shafer View Terrace (H-2020-0117), Inst.#2021-102396 and Apex (H-2020-0066), Inst.#2020-178120 from the existing development agreements to include in a new agreement and update the overall conceptual development plan for the site and other provisions as applicable. B. Request: Rezone of 38.69 acres of land from the R-2 to the R-8 (0.76 acre), R-15 to C-C (6.66 acres), and R-4 to R-8 (31.27 acres) zoning districts. C. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 381 single family residential building lots, 6 commercial building lots and 60 common lots on 131.89 acres of land in the R-8, R-15 and C-C zoning districts. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: October 8, 2024 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 9 PROJECT NAME: Apex Farr Subdivision (H-2024-0014) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name 2 CAS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fEPIDIAN*,, DEPARTMENT REPORT HEARING 10/8/2024 Legend DATE: Project Location 0 TO: Mayor&City Council Area or impact ® @� ' += City Limits FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner G analysis t 208-884-5533 sallen@meridiancity.org APPLICANT: Brighton Corporation - SUBJECT: H-2024-0014 Apex Farr—MDA,PP,RZ (aka Pinnacle) - LOCATION: West side of S. Locust Grove Rd.,north of E. Lake Hazel Rd. and east of S. @@ Meridian Rd.,in the NW 1/4 and the east 1/2 of Section 31, T.3N.,RJE. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The Applicant has submitted applications for the following: • Development Agreement modification(MDA)to remove the property annexed with South Meridian-Arbor Ridge (H-2015-0019, Inst. #2016-007071)and portions of the property annexed with Shafer View Terrace(H-2020-0117, Inst. #2021-102396)and Apex(H-2020- 0066 Inst. #2020-178120)from the existing agreements to include in a new agreement and update the overall conceptual development plan for the site and other provisions as applicable; • Rezone(RZ) of 38.69-acres of land from R-2 to R-8 (0.76-acre),R-15 to C-C(6.66-acres)and R-4 to R-8 (31.27-acres); and • Preliminary Plat(PP) consisting of 381 single-family residential building lots, 6 commercial building lots and 60 common lots on 131.89-acres of land in the R-8,R-15 and C-C zoning districts. B. Issues • Block 12 exceeds the maximum block face length allowed in UDC 11-6C-3F for residential districts along W. Precipice Dr. and along W.Vertex Dr. The Applicant requests a Council waiver to the block face standard for both of these block faces due to the block design being constrained by site conditions that include a large waterway/irrigation facility(i.e.the Farr Lateral)along the northern boundary and steep slopes ranging from 7-12%within a portion of the area. Traffic calming is proposed in the form of a 29-foot wide street section for W. Precipice Dr. along the Farr Lateral and bulb outs and choke points. (See Section III.E.6for more information) City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview • A 25-foot wide buffer is required in the C-C zoning district on Lots 1, 5 and 6,Block 23 to the abutting residential uses along the west boundary as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3. Landscaping and fencing(if the use can't be adequately buffered by landscaping)is required within the buffer in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The Applicant requests City Council approval of no buffer in this area on the commercial property with the provision of a 15-foot wide common area mew on the residential property, which will include landscaping and a sidewalk. The Applicant asserts the mew will act as a buffer that still provides connectivity to the adjoining uses and walkability to the adjoining commercial uses to the east in accord with the MU-C FLUM designation. Staff recommends if Council is amendable to the Applicant's request that the common area mew is increased to a minimum of 20-feet wide consistent with the linear open space standards in UDC H- 3G-3B.le and includes landscaping in accord with the standards for landscape buffers to adjoining uses listed in UDC 11-3B-9C.If Council grants the request,a reduction to the buffer width does not affect building setbacks; all commercial structures shall be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width(i.e. 25-feet)required in the C-C zoning district. (See Section III.D.3.iii for more information) As an alternative to the Applicant's request, between the Fesidential and eommereial portions of Bloek 23,whieh would require no W&F on the-G-G zoned-pF9per-.,ty, and., alley is provided or aeeess to the residential units rather-than a private stFeet. The addition of a publie StFeet will PFOVide a named StFeet for-addFessing the east faeing units,provide for on street parldng for guests of the Fesidential units and pFovide 8&RHSWOWseparation between land uses (see eoneept plan- . and Staffs original recommendation to provide a public street between the residential and commercial uses,which doesn't meet ACHD's off-set requirements, Staff recommends residential lots/uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses and zoned C-C. C. Recommendation Staff. Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA,RZ and PP requests with the provisions included below in Section IV. Commission: The Commission recommends approval to City Council of the proposed MDA,RZ and PP requests with the provisions recommended by Staff and changes requested by the Applicant and agreed upon by Staff included below in Section IV. D. Decision Pending II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1:Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Rural residential/agricultural - Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family residential detached dwellings - Existing/Proposed Zoning Existing:R-2(Low-density Residential),R-4(Medium- VII.A.2 low Density Residential),R-8 (Medium-density Residential)and R-15 (Medium-high Density Residential). Proposed:R-8 (Medium-density Residential),R-15 (Medium-high Density Residential),C-C(Community Business) Existing Future Land Use LDR(Low Density Residential),MDR(Medium Density VII.A.3 Designations Residential)and MU-C(Mixed Use—Community)with a school designation City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Table 2: Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date 4/9/2024 PREAPP-2023-0164 Neighborhood Meeting 2/15/2024 Site posting date 8/23/2024 Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District • Comments Received Yes • Commission Action Required No • Access Various access points • Traffic Level of Service Better than"E" lift Traffic Impact Study(Y/N) No ITD Comments Received No — Meridian Fire Distance to Station:I+/-mile to Station#7;Response Time: see comments Meridian Police No comments received Meridian Public Works Wastewater Distance to Mainline: Sewer is available at site;Impacts or Concerns: Flow is committed—see site specific conditions Meridian Public Works Water Distance to Mainline: Water is available at site in pressure zone 5—project is consistent with water master plan; Impacts or Concerns: See Public Works comments See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section for all department/agency and the public record for comments received on this application. Figure 1: One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:51131427850 Date Retrieved:2024 f B{29 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage I nfill Indicator. 598 616 Surrounding Area 7% not c y 46 ® City Limits 1,090 Not City Household Change Household&Population Growth i • Households E32020 Population Change:45.7°l0 Population ■Growth {Household and Popuiation Change since 2010 Decennial) - 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family tMK ® Multi-family D% ® Commercial 0 City of Meridian I Department Report II. Community Metrics Preliminary Plats (last.-years) Conditional Use Permit{last 5-years) Proposed Pro posed Pending Rending Approved (y +}}��yy(y/y �/�/�� �(yy� p�Jy- Approved (y y/� ]� J� 0 2 V 00 4000 LAME 8002 Q 1 V •�r 30 44 ■ Single-farnily ® Multi-family 2-00 1,000 Single-family A Residential 1-50 PO 7 Parcel Diversity 1-00 500 G a p Parcel Count c7� 0-50 � a •Average Acres '"es 0 .17.00 0 R-2 r.- R-B R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 aResidential Not Densky 0 9.70 � p 5-00 �:I 6.62 4.50 ■50 3.176 0.00 ---go-go Dwelling Units I Acre R-2 P-1 q 3 F-1s Figure 2: Service Impact Summary Ready Marginal Caution IPA I , Nr III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. History The subject property, except for the R-2 zoned portion,was annexed in 2015 with an R-4 zoning district as part of the South Meridian Category A annexation,which included multiple properties and property owners(H-2015-0019). A"placeholder"R-4 zoning district was approved with individual Development Agreements(DA's) for each property owner [i.e.Arbor Ridge(Inst. #2016-007071),Brighton Investments LLC(Inst. #2016-007072), SCS Brighton LLC(Inst. #2016-007073), Murgoitio Limited Partnership(Inst. #Inst. #2016-007074)],which require modification of the agreements prior to development of the property to approve any proposed development plan. In 2020, a modification to the existing DA's for Brighton Investments LLC(Inst.#2016-007072), SCS Brighton LLC(Inst. #2016-007073)and Murgoitio Limited Partnership(Inst. #Inst. #2016-007074 was approved,which replaced those agreements with one(1)new agreement(Apex H-2020-0066,DA Inst. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis #2020-178120). A rezone(Apex H-2020-00M)was approved for much of the subject property from the R-4 to the R-8 and R-15 districts. The Arbor Ridge R-4 zoned property along the northern boundary was under different ownership at that time and was not included in the rezone but is part of the subject rezone application. A preliminary plat(H-2020-0056)was also approved for Apex Northwest Subdivision,which included the R-15 zoned portion of the subject property at the southeast corner. The conceptual Master Plan included in the DA depicts"future development"with no specific development plan for the areas not included in the preliminary plat with a general street layout on the land southwest of the Williams gas pipeline and a future school at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Crescendo. In 2021,the R-2 zoned portion of the property was annexed with a DA(Inst. #2021-10239 and included in Shafer View Terrace Subdivision as Lot 1,Block 5 (H-2020-0117,FP-2021-0056). This lot was depicted as a future phase with no specific development plan. A preliminary plat(H-2021-0087)was approved in 2021 for Apex West Subdivision,which included Lot 1, Block 5, Shafer View Terrace Subdivision and a portion of the subject property.A portion of this property is included in the subject preliminary plat; the remainder will be part of Apex West. Table 4: Proiect Overview Description Details History H-2015-0019(AZ South Meridian:Arbor Ridge DA Inst.#2016-007071, Brighton Investments LLC DA Inst.#2016-007072,SCS Brighton LLC DA Inst.#2016-007073, Murgoitio Limited Partnership DA Inst.#Inst. #2016-007074);H-2020-0056(Apex Northwest—PP),H-2020-0066 [Apex MDA,RZ(replaced all earlier DA's)—Inst.#2020-1781201; Shafer View Terrace(H-2020-0117,DA Inst.#2021-102396);Apex West(H— 2021-0087);Apex NW Pool PBA-2024-0006—ROS#14520). Phasing Plan 7 Physical Features The McBirney Lateral runs east/west through this site,the Watkins Drain runs north/south through the northwest portion of this site,the Carlson Lateral runs along the northern boundary of the site and the Farr Lateral runs along the northern boundary of the site.The Williams Northwest gas pipeline also bisects this site. There is a significant grade on the northern portion of the site south of the Farr Lateral(it's higher in that area and slopes to the south). Acreage 131.89-acres Lots 381 single-family residential building lots,6 commercial building lots and 60 common lots B. General Overview Development Agreement Modification: The subject property is currently subject to three(3) different DA's (i.e. South Meridian-Arbor Ridge (H-2015-0019, Inst. #2016-007071); Shafer View Terrace(H-2020-0117, Inst. #2021-102396); and Apex(H-2020-0066 Inst. #2020-178120). A Development Agreement modification is proposed to include these properties in one(1)new agreement;these properties will no longer be subject to the previous DA's. (See legal description and exhibit map ofproperty subject to the new DA in Section VIT C below) An updated conceptual master plan, shown in Section VII.K below, is proposed to be included in the DA for the overall area subject to the DA.Note: The future school previously planned at the northwest corner of Locust Grove and Crescendo was shifted to the south side of Lake Hazel, east of Locust Grove; a public school is planned on the east side of Locust Grove Rd. in the future. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Rezone: A rezone of 38.69-acres of land is proposed from R-2 to R-8 (0.76-acre),R-15 to C-C(6.66-acres)and R-4 to R-8 (31.27-acres). (See legal descriptions and exhibit maps for property proposed to be rezoned in Section VII.D below) The area proposed to be rezoned to R-8 is designated Medium Density Residential(MDR) on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM), except for a 0.76-acre portion which is designated Low Density Residential(LDR). The area proposed to be zoned C-C is designated Mixed Use— Community(MU-C). The proposed development plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan FLUM designations. Preliminary Plat: The Preliminary Plat consists of 381 single-family residential building lots, 6 commercial building lots and 60 common lots on 131.89-acres of land in the proposed R-8,R-15 and C-C zoning districts and is a re-subdivision of a portion of Lot 1,Block 5, Shafer View Terrace Subdivision. The plat is proposed to develop in seven(7)final plat phases as shown on the phasing plan. (See preliminary plat and phasing plan in Section VII.E below.)Note: The remainder of Lot 1, Block 5 of Shafer View Terrace Subdivision that's not part of the subject plat will be included in the Apex West final plat(H-2021- 0087). The minimum lot size proposed is 4,180 square feet(s.f.)with an average lot size of 8,021 s.f. A gross density of 2.84 units per acre with a net density of 5.43 units per acre is proposed,which is consistent with the density desired in the MDR FLUM designation. A mix of front-loaded and alley-loaded units in a variety of different lot sizes are proposed with larger lots along the northern boundary to provide a transition between the rural lots to the north of the Farr Lateral. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There are some existing structures on the site that are required to be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat phase in which they are located. There are several site constraints that effect the design and layout of this project, as follows(see map below for reference): • The Carlson Lateral runs along the northwest boundary of the site • The Farr Lateral runs along the northeast boundary of the site at the highest elevation of the project. • The McBimey Lateral will be piped and is located in the southeast portion of the project. • The Watkins Drain runs through the northwest quadrant. • The Williams Northwest Gas Pipeline bisects this site within a 75-foot wide easement. • There is an existing sewer trunk line on the northwest corner of the property in a 25-foot wide easement. • There are slopes between 7 and 12%within the area shown in red on the map below. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis IN ti I � 1'1 s SIffrHlrant grads + Farr s,d MrE*4i r'Laterals OM Watkins I kpin � � � _ - 'Nlliunu Pipeline a y * ' 4 0 MP rt } • e r I Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): Single-family residential detached dwellings are principally permitted in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts,per UDC Table 11-2A-2. Commercial uses are allowed in the C-C zoning district as listed in UDC Table 11-2B-2. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): See UDC Table 11-2A-6 and 11-2A-7 for the dimensional standards of the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts,respectively; and, UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the dimensional standards of the C-C zoning district. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): There are no specific use standards that apply for single-family detached dwellings. UDC Table 11-2B-2 notes if specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3 are applicable to certain uses in the C-C zoning district. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Existing structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Future development of the C-C zoned area should comply with the structure and site design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19;review for compliance with these standards will take place with future development applications. The proposed development should create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#3.07.01A. 2. Qualified Open Space &Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-4-3-27): The residential portion of the development is required to comply with the open space and site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3 and 11-3G-4. A minimum of 15% (or 18.93-acres based on 126.2-acres of residential area) qualified open space is required to be provided in the R-8 and R-15 zoning districts; a total of 36.1-acres (or 29.1%)is proposed that meets the quality standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3A.2. Qualified open space consists of open grassy areas exceeding 5,000 square feet in area,an education garden,linear open space, street buffers along arterial and collector streets,parkways and stormwater detention facilities. When counting street buffers along arterial and collector streets,the buffers need to comply with the enhanced buffer requirements in UDC 11-3G-3B.3.Parkways along local residential streets are required to meet the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.4 when counted toward open space. Stormwater detention facilities are required to meet the standards in UDC 11-3G-3B.5 when counted toward open space. Amenities totaling a minimum of 26 points from each category are required to be provided based on the area of the development(i.e. 131.89-acres). An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.I. Site amenities totaling 30 points (pts.)are proposed from each category as follows: • Quality of Life: two(2) fitness courses(2 pts. each=4 pts.), a dog park(2 pts.),two(2) education gardens(1 pt. each=2 pts.). Per UDC 11-3G-3C,the fitness course is required to have a minimum of six(6) stations permanently installed; and the dog park is required to have bags for dog waste disposal,a double entrance gate,bench(es) and fencing to enclose a minimum of 5,000 square feet and secured open space for an off-leash dog park. • Recreation Activity Area: swimming pool with changing facilities&restrooms (6 pts.), (2) tot lots/natural play areas (1 pt. each=2 pts.). Per UDC 11-3G-3D,the swimming pool is required to be constructed in ground and meet all Building Code requirements; the tot lots are required to have commercial grade play equipment scaled and designed for the use and safety of younger children and benches for seating shall be nearby. • Pedestrian or Bicycle Circulation System: 0.37-mile of pathway aligned with linear open space(1 pt.)and 1.61-miles of multi-use pathway(12 pts.). The proposed pathways are not required sidewalk adjacent to public right-of-way. The multi-use pathway will connect to planned pedestrian or bicycle routes outside the development in accord with the Pathways Master Plan.All pathways will be designed and constructed in accord with adopted City standards. • Multi-modal: bicycle repair station(1 pt.) City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis The bicycle repair station is required to be a fixed installation with tools and an air pump per UDC 11-3G-4F.2. The proposed common open space and site amenities meet and exceed UDC standards for such. i. Landscaping is required to be provided in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G-5B. The proposed development is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy#2.02.00,which states, Plan for safe, attractive, and well-maintained neighborhoods that have ample open space, and generous amenities that provide varied lifestyle choices. 3. Landscaping (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3B): Attractive landscaping and pedestrian friendly design is required within new developments in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02G. Landscaping is required to be provided within the development in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B. i. Landscape buffers along streets A 25-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street;20-foot wide street buffers are required along all collector streets (i.e. E. Crescendo St., S. Sublimity Ave.,E. Quartz Creek St.,Apex Way and Elevated Way); and a 10-foot wide street buffer is required along local streets(i.e.E. Phenomenal St.)in the C-C district. Landscaping is required within the street buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC II- 3B-7C. All street buffers are required to be in a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement,maintained by the property owner,homeowner's association or business owner's association per UDC 11-313-7C.2a and should be depicted on the plat. A 4-foot tall berm is proposed within the street buffer along S. Locust Grove Rd. ii. Parking lot landscaping Internal parking lot landscaping is required with future development of the C-C zoned lots in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-8C. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses A 25-foot wide buffer is required in the C-C zoning district on Lots 1, 5 and 6,Block 23 to the abutting residential uses along the west boundary as set forth in UDC Table 11-2B-3. Landscaping and fencing(if the use can't be adequately buffered by landscaping)is required within the buffer in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. The Applicant requests City Council approval of no buffer in this area with the provision of a 15-foot wide common area mew on the residential portion,which will include landscaping and a sidewalk as shown in the exhibit below. The Applicant asserts the mew will act as a buffer that still provides connectivity to the adjoining uses and walkability to the adjoining commercial uses to the east in accord with the MU-C FLUM designation. Staff recommends if Council is amendable to the Applicant's request that the common area mew is increased to a minimum of 20-feet wide consistent with the linear open space standards in UDC 11-3G-3B.le and includes landscaping in accord with the standards for landscape buffers to adjoining uses listed in UDC 11-3B-9C.If Council grants the request, a reduction to the buffer width shall not affect building setbacks; all structures shall be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width(i.e. 25-feet) required in the C-C zoning district. As an alternative to the Applicant's request,whieh would require no buffer-on the zoned property, Staff r-eeommends a publie street is provided between the residential and City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis eommereial portions of Bloek 23 and an alley is provided for aeeess to the residential units rather-than a private street.The addition of a public street will provide a named street for addFe%ifig the east facing units,provide for on street parldng for guests of the residential units and provide a tFansition/sepaFation between land and Staffs original recommendation to provide a public street between the residential and commercial uses, which doesn't meet ACHD's off-set requirements,Staff recommends residential lots/uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses and zoned C-C.See concept layout below in Section III E.1. ®r f --------- iv. Tree preservation Existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site during development may require mitigation(see UDC 11-3B-10 for more information). Include mitigation information on the landscape plan that demonstrates compliance with the standards in UDC 11-3B- 10.C.5. v. Storm integration Stormwater integration is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11 C. A Geotechnical Investi a tion report was submitted with this application. vi. Pathway landscaping Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C. 4. Parking (UDC 11-3Q: Off-street parking is required to be provided with all development in accord with UDC standards. i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for all single-family residential units in accord with the standards for such listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6. ii. Nonresidential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for non-residential uses in the commercial district in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-6B. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis iii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking is required to be provided for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, except for single-family residences,per UDC 11-3C-6G. Bicycle parking facilities should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Several conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed residential development, included in Section VII.L below.A mix of single-story and 2-story homes are proposed that include a variety of siding styles with masonry accents in a variety of colors and design elements/features with varying roof profiles and wall modulation that demonstrate the high quality of development proposed. Design review is not required for single-family detached structures.However,because the rear and/or sides of homes facing S.Locust Grove Rd. and internal collector streets will be highly visible, Staff recommends a DA provision requiring those elevations incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g.projections, recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types,or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from adjacent public streets. Single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. Conceptual elevations weren't submitted for the commercial portion of the development. Administrative design review is required for those structures as well as the swimming pool and associated structure in the residential portion of the development in accord with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. Staff is of the opinion the proposed conceptual building elevations are in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02L: "Support beautiful and high-quality development that reinforces neighborhood character and sustainability. 6. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All/any fencing proposed on the site should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 for fencing along waterways and 11-3A-7. 7. Parkways (UDC 11-3A-17): All parkways should comply with the standards for such listed in UDC 11-3A-17. E. Transportation Analysis A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was not submitted for this development as ACHD did not require one. Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)/Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • Amity Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from SH-69(Meridian Road) to Locust Grove Road with a design year of 2023-2024,a right-of-way year of 2027-2028,and construction year yet to be determined. • Amity Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 5-lanes from Locust Grove Road to Eagle Road with a design year of 2025-2026, a right-of-way year of 2027, and a construction year yet to be determined. • Locust Grove Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be widened to 3-lanes from Amity Road to Victory Road with a design year of 2028-2029 and a construction year yet to be determined. • The intersection of Amity Road and Locust Grove Road is scheduled in the IFYWP to be constructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 2-lanes on the north leg, 2-lanes on the south,4- lanes east, and 4-lanes on the west leg with a design year of 2023-2024, a right-of-way year of 2027-2928, and a construction year yet to be determined. • Locust Grove Road is listed in the CIP to be widened to 3-lanes from Lake Hazel Road to Amity Road between 2036 and 2040. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Condition of Area Roadways(Traffic Count is based on Vehicles per Hour(VPH): Roadway Frontage Functional PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Classification Traffic Count Level of Service Locust Grove Road 2,006-feet Minor Arterial 181 Better than"E" Lake Hazel 0-feet Minor Arterial 351 Better than"E" *Acceptable level of service for a three-lane minor arterial is"E"(720 VPH). "Acceptable level of service for a five-lane minor arterial is"E"(1,540 VPH). Collector streets are required to be constructed with development in accord with ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM) and/or as required by ACHD. The following streets are required to be constructed as collector streets: E. Crescendo St.,E. Quartz Creek St.,Apex Way and Elevated Way. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): 1. Access is proposed via the extension of E. Quartz Creek St., E. Tranton St. and E. Liberator--Q. at the project's west boundary; and from S. Locust Grove Rd. via S. Apex Way and E. Crescendo St. An emergency access is proposed at the north boundary via S. Margaret Ave. East Liberator Ct. stubs to the northwest boundary of the site but due to the slope in that area,that street is not proposed to be extended with development. Stub streets are proposed for future extension and interconnectivity with adjacent development and future development in Apex/Pinnacle. An east/west and north/south collector street is required to be provided through the development per ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM). A collector street is stubbed to the north,which will extend to E. Amity Rd. with future development;and S. Apex Way will extend to S. Locust Grove Rd. as a collector street in accord with the MSM. Cross-access/ingress-egress easements should be provided between all of the commercial lots(i.e. Lots 1-6,Block 23) either by recorded easement or as a note on the final plat in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. The north/south drive depicted on the plat that provides access to the residential lots in Block 23 should be realigned to reflect the updated design shown on the landscape plan. Staff is not in favor of the proposed layout of this block with the residential units abutting the parking lot for the commercial area with only 15-feet in between consisting of landscaping and a pathway.A,,eor-dingly Staff..............ends the a s drive for-the residential units is uses.eonstr-ueted as an alley and a nor-th/south publie street is provided between the residential and the eommer-eial lots for-addressing purposes for-the east f6eing residential units,for-on str-ee par-Iiing for-the residential units and as a tr-ansition/separ-ation between land The following is the existing layout and a eoneept layout showing Stafrs r-eeommended ehanges; Because Staffs original recommendation to provide a local street between the residential and commercial uses doesn't meet ACHD's off-set policy, Staff recommends the residential lots/uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses and zoned C-C. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Existing Layout: Recommended layout: �` 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Local and collector street connectivity is proposed within the development in accord with Comprehensive Plan Policy#6.01.02B, "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity. " 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multi-use pathways are required to be provided with development in accord with the Pathways Master Plan as required by the Park's Department. Per the plan, a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway is required within the Williams gas pipeline easement and should extend as a detached pathway along the north side of E.Crescendo St.to the detached pathway along S. Locust Grove Rd.A 10-foot wide detached multi-use pathway is also required along the west side of S.Elevated Way to create a pedestrian connection between the proposed park amenity and the existing pathway to the south in Apex West subdivision. A pathways plan is included in Section VII.J that depicts all pathways proposed within the development. A 14-foot wide public use easement is required for the multi-use pathways required by the Pathways Master Plan where they lie outside of public right-of-way and should be submitted to the Planning Division and recorded prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. The easement and recorded instrument number should be depicted on the plat. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. A pathways plan is included in Section VII.J that depicts all pathways proposed within the development. 4. Sidewalks (UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. A sidewalk is not proposed along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to the Farr Lateral on the northeast side of W. Precipice Dr. due to the grade difference between the waterway and the street(the lateral is higher). The UDC requires sidewalks to be provided on both sides of public streets and does not include a provision for a waiver; therefore, Staff recommends changes to the development plan to provide a sidewalk along the northeast side of W.Precipice Dr. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis Staff recommends a DA provision requiring 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways to be provided along S.Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street, all internal collector streets and those abutting this site in lieu of on-street bike lanes for public safety. 5. Private Streets (UDC 11-3F-4): All private streets constructed within the subdivision should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. Private streets are proposed for access and addressing for the residential lots in Blocks 2 and 23. A separate application is required to be submitted for approval of the private streets and should be submitted concurrently with the final plat application. Because the proposed private streets will result in several building lots having frontage on both public and private named streets in Blocks 2 and 23,which will likely create confusion for emergency responders, Staff is not in favor of the proposed layout of these blocks. Staff has recommended changes to the layout of Block 23,which will alleviate this issue, as discussed in Section III.E.1 above. Staff recommends the Applicant make changes to the layout of lots in Block 2 to comply with ACHD's requirements for public alleys so that these lots only have frontage on one(1) named street. 6. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): Compliance with the subdivision design and improvements standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3 is required. Alleys are required to comply with the standards in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. The proposed alleys appear to comply with these standards. Common driveways are required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3D. • Common driveways should serve a maximum of four(4)units; in no case should more than three (3)dwelling units be located on one(1)side of the driveway. The common driveway in Block 12 serving Lots 72-75 exceeds the maximum number of dwelling units that may be served on one(1) side of the driveway. The plat should be revised to remove one(1) of these lots to comply with the standard; or, an alternative compliance request/application may be submitted to UDC 11-6C-3D.1 to be allowed four(4) driveways on one(1) side of the common driveway in accord with UDC 11-6C-3D.9. Note: The Fire Dept.has approved the design of this common driveway. • Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited,unless separated by a minimum five-foot wide landscaped buffer planted with shrubs,lawn or other vegetative groundcover—construction of this buffer is the responsibility of the developer and not the adjacent homeowner. • Perpetual ingress/egress is required either by a recorded easement or as a note on a recorded final plat.The easement or plat note shall include a requirement for maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment. In residential districts,block faces should not be more than 750-feet in length without an intersecting street or alley,except where a pedestrian connection is provided,then the maximum block face may be extended up to 1,000-feet in length. The City Council may approve a block face up to 1,200-feet in length where the block design is constrained by site conditions which include steep slopes in excess of 10%or a large waterway/irrigation facility. In no case shall a block face exceed 1,200-feet,unless waived by City Council. Where appropriate,traffic calming may be required for blocks in excess of 1,000 feet. • The face of Block 12 along W. Precipice Dr. is approximately 2,500-feet. Two (2) pedestrian connections are proposed within the block that provides pedestrian access between streets. The Farr Lateral runs along the north side of W. Precipice Dr. at the highest point of the development. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis • The face of Block 12 along W.Vertex Dr. is approximately 1,500-feet. One(1)pedestrian connection is proposed within the block that provides pedestrian access between streets. The Applicant requests a Council waiver to the block face standard for both of these block faces based on the above-noted site constraints in addition to those noted in Section III.C1 above. Traffic calming is proposed in the form of a 29-foot wide street section for W. Precipice Dr. along the Farr Lateral and bulb outs and choke points at pedestrian crossings as shown below. Note: The proposed reduced street section will only allow parking on one side of the street. o- �•+. oo o _ter Y f r' a •, F. Services Analysis See Service Accessibility Report in Section VII.B below. 1. Waterways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): All waterways, except natural waterways, are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. The McBirney Lateral runs east/west through this site within a 25-foot wide easement from centerline both directions and the Farr Lateral runs mostly off-site along the northeast boundary of the site within a 30-foot wide easement from centerline both directions. Both of these facilities are under the jurisdiction of the Boise Project Board of Control(BPBC). The Board does not allow landscaping, including trees and/or shrubs (other than gravel)within their easements—all fences, gates,pathways, and pressurized irrigation lines are required to be located just off the edge of the easements and the easements must be left a flat drivable surface. The Watkins Drain runs north/south through the northwest portion of this site and the Carlson Lateral runs along the northern boundary of the site. 2. Pressurized Irrigation (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided in each development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in accord with the adopted standards, specifications and ordinances; design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City per UDC 11-3A-18. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): All utilities for the proposed development are required to be installed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-21. Water service is available at the site.Main lines are required to be extended to and through the subject property with development. The developer should coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Dept. and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Sanitary sewer service is available at the site.Main lines are required to be extended to and through the subject property with development. The developer should coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Dept. and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. 5. Topography There is a significant grade on the northeastern portion of the site south of the Farr Lateral (it's higher in that area and slopes to the southwest). 6. Hazards The Williams Northwest gas pipeline bisects this site and lies within a 75-foot wide easement. Future development is required to comply with the Williams Pipeline Developer's Handbook. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A new Development Agreement(DA) shall be required as a provision of the MDA and RZ applications. The previous DA's [i.e. South Meridian-Arbor Ridge(H-2015-0019,Inst. #2016- 007071); Shafer View Terrace (H-2020-0117, Inst. #2021-102396); and Apex(H-2020-0066 Inst. #2020-178120)] shall no longer be in effect for the subject property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance,a new DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner at the time of rezone ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat application shall not be submitted until the rezone is finalized.The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision&Order for the Rezone and MDA request. The new DA shall incorporate the following provisions: i. Future development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the conceptual development plan,preliminary plat, landscape plan, open space and site amenity exhibit included below in Section VII,the conditions contained herein and the standards in the Unified Development Code(UDC). ii. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any building permit applications for the residential portion of the development and prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancies within the commercial portion of the development. iii. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway shall be constructed within the Williams Northwest gas pipeline easement in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. iv. Depiet 10 feet wide detaehed sidewalks/path-ways along both sides of a4l eelleeter-streets (i.e. E. Cr-eseende ., S. Sublimity Ave.,E. Qtiai4z Cfeek St., Apex Way and Qeva4ed Way) - within the street buffer-along S. Loeust Grove an after-ial street in lieu of on stfeet bieyeellee ., lanes. v. Future development shall comply with the Williams Pipeline Developer's Handbook. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments &Conditions vi. The rear and/or sides of 2-story homes facing S. Locust Grove Rd. and the collector streets (i.e. E. Crescendo St., S. Sublimity Ave.,E. Quartz Creek St.,Apex Way and Elevated Way) shall incorporate articulation through changes in two or more of the following: modulation(e.g. projections,recesses, step-backs,pop-outs),bays,banding,porches,balconies,material types, or other integrated architectural elements to break up monotonous wall planes and roof lines that are visible from the subject public streets. Single-story homes are exempt from this requirement. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 25-foot wide street buffer along S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street; 20-foot wide street buffers along all collector streets(i.e. E. Crescendo St., S. Sublimity Ave., E. Quartz Creek St.,Apex Way and Elevated Way); and a 10-foot wide street buffer is required along the local street(i.e. E. Phenomenal St.)in the C-C district. ii. All street buffers shall be depicted in a common lot or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.2a. iii. Depiet 10 feet wide detaehed sidewalks,�p�ways along both sides of all eelleeter-stfeets R. Cr-eseende ., S. Sublimity Ave.,E. Qttm4z Creek St., Apex Way and Elev, within the street buffer-along S. Leeiist Grove ., 1 Only 5-foot wide detached sidewalks are required in accord with UDC 11-3A-17. iv. A 14-foot wide public use easement shall be depicted on the final plat for the multi-use pathways required by the Park's Dept.per the Pathways Master Plan where they lie outside of public right-of-way. The easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division and recorded prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat and the recorded instrument number shall be included on the plat. v. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited,unless separated by a minimum five-foot wide landscaped buffer planted with shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.5; include a buffer if fencing is proposed. vi. For all common driveways, a perpetual ingress/egress easement shall be depicted on the plat and a note shall be included for requirement of maintenance of a paved surface capable of supporting fire vehicles and equipment in accord with UDC 11-6C-3CD.8. vii. Depict cross-access/ingress-egress easements between all of the commercial lots(i.e. Lots 1-6, Block 23)in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A.2. viii.Reconfigure Block 12 to comply with the block face standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3F,unless otherwise waived by City Council. The Applicant requests City Council waive the block face standards on both sides of Block 12 that face W. Precipice Dr. and W. Vertex Dr. ix. Revise the alignment of the north/south drive that provides access to the residential lots in Block 23 to reflect the updated layout shown on the landscape plan. x. Remove Lot 24,Block 2 to enlarge the mew area and to reflect the updated layout shown on the landscape plan. xii. Revise the layout of the lots in Block 2 to comply with ACHD's requirements for public alleys so that these lots only have frontage on one(1)named street. xiii.Depict a sidewalk along the northeast side of W. Precipice Dr. as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17D. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions xiv.Depict traffic calming(i.e. a reduced 29-foot wide street section for W. Precipice Dr.,bulb-outs and choke points)within the development as shown on the exhibit in Section VILE as allowed by ACHD. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat application shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 25-foot wide street buffer along S. Locust Grove Rd., an arterial street; 20-foot wide street buffers along all collector streets(i.e. E. Crescendo St., S. Sublimity Ave., E. Quartz Creek St.,Apex Way and Elevated Way); and a 10-foot wide street buffer along E. Phenomenal St., a local street,in the C-C district,in accord with UDC Tables 11-2A-6, 11-2A-7 and 11-2B- 3. ii. All required street buffers shall be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC I I- 3B-7C. The arterial and collector street buffers shall comply with the enhanced buffer requirements listed in UDC 11-3G-3B.3 because they were counted toward open space requirements. iii. Parkways along local residential streets shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3G- 3B.4 when counted toward open space requirements as proposed. iv. Stormwater detention facilities shall comply with the standards in UDC 11-3G-3B.5 when counted toward open space requirements as proposed. v. Include mitigation information on the landscape plan that demonstrates compliance with the standards in UDC 11-3B-10.C.5. vi. Depiet 10 feet wide detaehed sidewalks/pathways along both sides of all eelleeter-streets (i.e. E. Gfeseende St., S. Sublimity Ave.,E. QttaFtz Creek ., within the street btt�r-alefig S. Leettst Grove Rd.,an a4er-ial stfeet, in liett of an stfeet bieyele Apex Way and Elevated Way) a vii. Solid fencing adjacent to common driveways is prohibited,unless separated by a minimum five-foot wide landscaped buffer planted with shrubs, lawn or other vegetative groundcover as set forth in UDC 11-6C-3D.5; if fencing is proposed, depict a buffer. Construction of this buffer is the responsibility of the developer and not the adjacent homeowner. viii.Depict a sidewalk along the northeast side of W. Precipice Dr. as set forth in UDC 11-3A-17D. ix. Depiet a aef&setAh publie street between the r-esidea4ial lots and the eoramer-eial lots in Blee 23 with par-king on at ieast one(1) side of the stfeet-. x. Depict landscaping in common open space areas in accord with the standards listed in UDC I I- 3G-5B. xi. Depict landscaping along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. 4. The fitness course shall to have a minimum of six(6) stations permanently installed in accord with UDC 11-3G-3C.6. 5. The dog park shall have bags for dog waste disposal,a double entrance gate,bench(es)and fencing to enclose a minimum of 5,000 square feet and secured open space for an off-leash dog park in accord with UDC 11-3G-3C.9. 6. The swimming pool shall be constructed in ground and meet all Building Code requirements in accord with UDC 11-3G-3D.1. 7. The tot lots shall have commercial grade play equipment scaled and designed for the use and safety of younger children and benches for seating shall be nearby in accord with UDC 11-3G-3D.3. City of Meridian I Department Report IV. City/Agency Comments & Conditions 8. The bicycle repair station is required to be a fixed installation with tools and an air pump per UDC 11-3G-4F.2. 9. Either apply for alternative compliance to UDC 11-6C-3D.1 to be allowed four(4)driveways on one(1) side of the common driveway for Lots 72-75,Block 12; or,remove one (1)lot in this location to comply with the standard.If alternative compliance is requested, the request shall be submitted concurrent with the final plat application. 10. Prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature, a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division, approved by City Council and recorded for the multi-use pathway along the Williams Northwest gas pipeline and any other pathways required by the Park's Department in accord with the Pathways Master Plan that are outside of public right- of-way. Include the recorded instrument number of the easement(s)along with a depiction of the easement(s) on the final plat. 11. All private streets constructed within the subdivision shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4.A separate application is required to be submitted for approval of private street(s) and shall be submitted concurrently with the final plat application. 12. All waterways, except natural waterways, are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. 13. Off-street parking is required to be provided for all single-family residential units in accord with the standards for such listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6; and for non-residential uses in the commercial district in accord with UDC 11-3C-6B. Bicycle parking is required for non-residential uses as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6G;bicycle parking facilities shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. 14. A 25-foot wide buffer to residential uses shall be provided with development of the commercial lots (i.e. Lots 1, 5 and 6,Block 23). The Applicant requests City Council approval of no buffer in this area on the C-C zoned property with the provision of a 1 S foot wide common mew on the residential portion, which will include landscaping and a sidewalk. If Council grants the request, a reduction to the buffer width shall not affect building setbacks; all structures shall be set back from the property line a minimum of the buffer width required in the applicable zoning district. As an alternative,Staff recommends residential lots/uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses and zoned C-C. 15. The existing structures on the site shall be removed prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat phase in which they are located. 16. Administrative design review shall be required for future commercial structures on Lots 1-6, Block 23 and the swimming pool and associated structure in accord with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual. 17. All waterways, except natural waterways, intersecting,crossing or lying within the area being development are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6. If left open, fencing may be required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C. 18. Permanent addresses cannot be assigned until Ada County has approved the proposed street names. Other Agency comments may be accessed in the project ale included in the public record. City of Meridian I Department Report 0. Other Agency comments may be accessed in the project file,included in the public record. V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment and development plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed districts, including the purpose statement. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the proposed map amendment should not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the proposed request is for a rezone, not annexation. B. Preliminary Plat(UDC-613-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision- making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and will be consistent with the UDC if the Applicant complies with the above-noted conditions. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services are available to the site and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds there are no scheduled public improvements adjacent to or on this site. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. City of Meridian I Department Report V. Findings 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MDA,RZ and PP requests with the provisions included above in Section IV. Council should consider and take action on the waivers requested by the Applicant pertaining to block face and buffer to residential uses. B. Commission: The Commission heard these items on September 5, 2024.At the public hearing,the Commission moved to approve the subject MDA request. 1. Summary of the Commission public hearing a. In favor: Amanda McNutt and Jon Wardle,Brighton Corp. (Applicant's Representatives) b. hi opposition: None c. Commenting: Julie Edwards,Melissa Fulkerson d. Written testimony: Amanda McNutt,Brighton Corp. (Applicant's Representative— response to the staff report) e. Staff presenting,application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) testimony a. Request from the neighbors on Mary Ln. for trees to be provided within the buffer along the south side of the Farr Lateral from approximately Locust Grove Rd. to Margaret Ln. for screeningurposes. The Applicant is amenable to providing trees in this location provided there is adequate area to do so outside of the Farr Lateral easement or through a license agreement with the Irrigation District. b. Opinion that people living in the residential units facing the commercial development in Block 23 would not want to look out their front windows into a parking lot. 3. Key issue(s) of discussion by the Commission: a. The requested waiver to block face standards in regard to both faces of Block 12 and the associated site constraints. b. The requested reduction of the buffer to residential uses on the commercial property in Block 23 and proposed design with the parking lot for the commercial uses abutting the residential property—generally not in favor of the proposed design. c. Concern pertaining to addressing for the lots that have frontage on a public street and are accessed off a named private street and confusion that may occur for emergency responders. 4. Commission changes to the Staff recommendation: a. At the recommendation of Staff,the Commission approved the Applicant's request to remove the requirement for 10-foot wide detached sidewalks to be provided along all collector streets in lieu of on-street bicycle lanes consistent with the 5-foot wide sidewalks constructed in the adjoining Apex developments(only 5-foot wide detached sidewalks are required by the UDC). modification to the condition(#A.3)requiring a revised landscape plan to be submitted to add that it shall be required with submittal of the final plat application; and modification to the condition(#A.9,)requiring alternative compliance to the common driveway standards to allow (4)lots on side of the driveway in Block 12 to be submitted with the final plat application if requested. 5. Outstandingissue(s)ssue(s)for City Council: City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action a. The Applicant requests deletion of the requirement for a north-south public street to be provided between the residential and the commercial lots in Block 23. b. The Applicant requests deletion of the requirement for the revision to the lot lam in Block 2 to comply with ACHD's requirements for public alleys,which was required so that the lots only have frontage on one named street rather than two. c. The Applicant requests deletion of the requirement for a sidewalk to be provided on the north side of West Precipice Drive;this is a UDC standard that can't be waived. d. The Applicant requests a waiver from Council to exceed the maximum block face allowed for Block 12 along W. Precipice Dr. and W.Vertex Dr. due to the site constraints described above in Section III.E.6. e. The Applicant requests a waiver from Council to not provide a 25-foot wide buffer in the C-C district on Lots 1, 5 and 6,Block 23 to the abutting residential uses along the west boundary with the provision of a 15-foot wide common area mew on the residential property,which will include landscaping and a sidewalk.As an alternative, Staff recommends residential lots/uses are removed from Block 23 and all of Block 23 is developed with commercial uses. C. City Council: Pending City of Meridian I Department Report VI. Action � 1 AMITY IN I' No pill I � L-AKE HAZEL - -�- � 1111111E-IIIIE - AMITY-II�I�� PIF � �',�i �_11■Inn►� i1 nnli�e� '�:�Iillllllllllll Im � II 11111111 � � � rrr�-�alr�nfs�r)t�i�{�fl/�r11 ,ii�ii'�i1` .�t' �� ��I�1,►�:IIIIunv:u1Ery6i �rrrti�ar II�I� ati� nnn► Q ���►♦ � �� I�, �w�w► Illur f♦ _.rye,1��i 11lilll,i'-i7_on 1�11 IIIIIIII nll mnurnr, h ,�_C 111 � �111 IIII�zsrpfrrp uui`- '=�— w L--AKEIN III ,IIII Illlli� _- r Ell nllll'111111 .. �'� all1111 1 -•- • ■ illlllll.nn--i11" dill ♦��I ■��1„� nuunR�.'G���IEluriri��I _ '`AMITY _Ind 1 • • I. ■' "7=111111 HOW ►ri tom,--�Inuai III �IIWEIii1111riii �� !!1"I ter•I/1//////lrrlpTr/� -• r - ♦�a111111��gaili� �► llllll\� + � , NINON Il • a �III 1��rltp.O�., �� • � i�h 11 W �1111 •' f�y�ill i� � �■■ r■M�%1ir��.:i '111111111 - IIIPl111111�� �n�ry�yf n/� � u,tl•_ �Io-a—'=��11.!Ill��lllin��1.— wL1�JH—L1'.�](C2!'� N11�1==n��11— 111111111111 =�� rrlr 'llllllll1111' �`r 'FYI 11111,n+ennr�lrr!nr� tltl : �� _ _ �, 1i1111111�Lilt�' �L-ArK'E�ZEL ` u _ innML G�IIIIAA-r11r�•i1111�11���i I� ��III • . - - AMITY � 61111 IN --- -- ;,� 5nnnm � -.I.mnuuull►�'y. r:���O.0 llAllnn ":::�IIII•llArlll hill' l:G rnrlj gg1111 - rr r'r Ik==-� -��n• IIr� ��� illllllr►+�tttra Aimmn!� ! ♦ t11111�+.+airy nnlmm�l►! a♦ i � 1 +.� -- nul'= -_e'.' nnunnm 4+ i�rlgy� ♦�� 11111\!'r`j�' u0000nail lm luul� "r•ra•� ii1 mminuu n� �1� 1♦♦I ■ ff ♦ 11111 �- rl _iiii000iom'nnlnull=a.'••.. „ nuuunm i==-:p � � ♦�, 7j������ ,�\�+ hnulrlum unh. � �� mum Iuii p Q►1 �� =Illllluw ni r�Q,a�l u��itui ela'�� � � �y iullr• � rt�� II =ywnnn =____1=i.il ��1��1E♦f �j� 0�� �a a111� � ♦ 11 rinuu-^ —`FIl� �� ~,��� � �ylaln 1111- �_ , �� ♦�1� Il =IBIII!mum Ilgmnno � ♦ � murti oun/uin = t = ____ �.� � ���� �,4�\_— � ♦1* �w All llllllll=_ =i 11f1 rn —= II •ar ii ail �" 1111111111-__' i� h.i101i�i4 '�Inili IIIII�'� '!_■■ r■ 1///Irk— E ,::;u:ar::. ••'roar,:_- _ -.I c,c,c.Fi�■p�oua - nulunln - _� Iz,��noon u_ a iuwin ninml�ova:_:-��! !11 nnn-- �- �u•Ilyr =1 IIAII==�nulllnllnl`'I. =lnnnnnu Ilanlu I _ ._•, lunn�nn Ilnlllnnl = �a rim�inT - _ S. m = �■ _ZI Il�lll�r'rPri7riiTu���rr�=_-_ I`\�� ,,. nnlnnrinnn�llull��nlllin lmnnn lolimimun� � '`�r�=r,�7lrranmurl.f(/�1�' ��' . L-AKE=HAZEL`:ntRI111�j - np .w•tir:`�Sri L`Illrl! nnn 7 C�►�t1��� W IIIIIf IIAr11� aa��a�"�,� B. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S 11314 7 50 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY fOverall -score: 18 17th Percentile Location In City Limits Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains < 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or > 2 acres � GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. ho Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals some of the time YELLOW Pathwa;s Within 114 mile of current pathways Transit Not within 114 of current or future transit route Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration(#of lanes in master streets YELLOWY plan) > existing (4 of lanes) &road IS in 5 yr work plan School Walking Proximity From 112 to 1 mile walking MLOW School Drivability Not within 2 miles driving of existing or future school I RED Eithera Regional Park within 1 mile OR a Community Park Walkability Park within 1/2 mile OR a Neighborhood Park within GREEN 114 mile walking Report gerereffid on CB-2!�-2424 by 1J_:RID1AK%,s311r City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Legal Description&Exhibit Map for Boundary of Proposed New Development Agreement Im June 24,2024 Apex 5ubdIvision Project No-21.249 WibitA Legal Description for Deve I apme nt Agreement Modification(Apex Farr 5ubdiwWm) A parcel of land situated in a portion of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,15-M-,City of Meridianr Ada County, Idaho,and being more particularly described as follows'. Cornmencingat an aJurninum cap marking the southeast corner of said Section 31,which bears =0 2'22"E a distance of 2,700_07 feet from a brass cap marking the ea5l 1/4 comer of said Section 31, thence fallowing the easterly line of the Southeast 1/4 Df Section 31,NOO'32'22"W a distance of593.57 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line, N89`42'21 rW a distance of 67.25 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar❑n the subdivision boundary of Apex Northwest Subdivision No.1(Rook 124, Pages 19693-19693,records of Ada County,Idaho)and being the POINT OF BEG INNIW Thence foil❑wing the subdivision boundary of said Apex Northwest SuhdiviSion No-1 the fallowing three (3)courses: I. N89042'2I"W a distance of 563,32 feet to a 5f8-inch rebar; 2. N39'31'DD"W a distanoe of 11.71 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; 3. N39'43'08"W a distance of 1.50 fleet to a 5f 8-inch rebar on the subdivision boundary of Apex Northwest Subdivision No_2(Book 124,Pages 19$44-19$47,records of Ada County,Idaho); Thence leaving said subdivision boundary of Apex Northwest suhdivision Na. 1 and following Said subdivision boundary of Apex Northwest Subdivision No.2 the following seven(7)courses: 1, N00'16'52"F a distance of 528.00 feet to a 5/8-Inch rebar; 2. 14.14 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right,said curve having a radius of 9M feet,a delta angle of 90 '47",a chord bearing of N45'27'15"E and a chard distance of 17.73 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; 3. 589'42'21"E a distance of 146.58 feet toa 5/8-inch rebar; 4_ NOU1739"E a distance of 87.50 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; 5- N89'42'21"W a distance of 130.00 feet to a 5/8-Inch rebar; 6. S70'21'17'W a distance of 24.92 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; 7_ N89"42'21"W a distance of 47.64 feet; Thence leaving said subdivision boundary of Apex Northwest Subdivision No.2,N47°56'33"W a distatice of 251,11 feet; Thence N48'54'WW a distance of 47.18 feet; Thence N47'51'19"W a distance of 1,1538.44 feet; Thence 542'UB'410W a distance of 461.91 feet; T#ience 50.41 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the right, 5ald curve#laving a radius of 60.00 feet,a delta angle of 49'08'12",a chord hearing of 56-6'1 2'47"W and a Chord distance of 48,94 feet; Thence N83'4VOW'W a distance of 40,82 feet; Thence N44'07'12"W a distance of 21.37 feed; 7henre 19852 feet along the arc of a rirrular curve to the left,said ounce having a radius of 311.50 feet, a delta angle of 36'30'56",a chard bearing of N22'15'05"w and a chard distanre of 195.19feet; Thence N40"31'33"W a distance of 241.33 feet; 5725 North Discovery Way•Boise,Idahv 8371 •208A5 9.6939 kmengllp.com City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Thence 226.01 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 263,50 feet, a delta angle of49"31'13",a chord bearing of P465`17'09'W and a chord distance of 219.04 feet; Thence 589`57'15"W a distance of 450.61 feet; Thence_5W02'450E a distance of 31.50 feet to the southerly Ilne of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 114 of Section 13; Thence following said southerly line, 589"5715"W a distance of 529.87 feet to a 5/$-inch rebar marking -Center-West if 16 corner of said Section 31 also being the southeast corner of Prevail Subdivision No. 1, Back 120,Pages 18715-18719, records of Ada County, Idaho); Thence leavirig said southerly line and following the westerly line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 114, N00"31'1VE a distance of 1,326.96 feet to a 5/9-inch mbar marking the Northwest 1/16 corner of said Secticn 31 (also being the northeast corner of Prevail Subdivision ale_2,Book 121,Pages 19054- 19057, records of Ada County, Idaho and being the southeast corner of Prevail Subdivision No.3,9e0k 126,Pages 20182-20184,records of Ada County, Idaho); Thence leaving said westerly line of the Southeast 1J4 of the Northwest 114 and fallawingthe westerly IIn-e of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, NWZO'�6"E a distance of 2 06.99 feet to the northeast corner of said Prevail Subdivision No_3; Thence fallowing said westerly line, NDY2V36"E a distance of 24.96 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line, N81°55'55"E a distance of 531.16 feet to a 5J8-inch rebar; Thence S25'53'15M a distance of 7.65 feet to a 5/8-i nch rebar; Thence$82'35'12"W a distance of 8,19 feet to a 5I8-inch rebar on the northeasterly bank of the Farr Lateral; Thence Following said northeasterly bank the following five(5)courses: 1. 48.99 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 58.E feet, a delta angle of48'23'56",a chord bearing of 522°4616"E and a chord distance of 47.55 feet to a 518- inch rebar; 2. SW58'07"E a distance of 45,40 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar; 3. SW23'34"E a distance of 180.18 feet to a 5/8-inch mbar; 4. 161,54 feet along the arc of a curve to the left,said curve having a fadius of 588.00 fact,a delta angle of 15044'2V, a chord bearing-Gf 562"15'470E and a chord distance of 151,03 feet to a 5/8- inch rebar; 5. Thence S70"14'4WE a distance of 112.44 feet to a 5/8-inch rebar on the northerly llne of said So utheast 1/4 of the No rthwest 114 of 5ectio n 31; Thence leaving said northeasterly bark and said northerly line,519°57'31" a distance of 12.12 feet to the centerline of said Farr Lateral, Thence following said centerline the foilowing three(3)courses= 1_ S70°(17'29"E a distance of 9-75 feet; 2, 562°02'58"E a distance of 207.13 feet 3. S65°37'43"E a distance of 186.17 feet to the 4�,�sterly line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1f4; Thence leaving said centeHine and following said easterly line,500'38'17mW a distance of 30.20 feet to a point on a line being parallel to and 25-ft southwesterly of the centerline of said Farr Lateral, Thence following said link the fallowing fourteen �14)courses: 1. 553455'51"E a distance of 237,97 feet; 2. S67`14'14"E a distance of 113,95 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar; 3. 572"17'39"f a distance inf S7„22 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 4. S78°5Y$8"E a distance of 439.81 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. 57545510''E a distance of 99.84 feet; PAGE 12 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits 6- 5451*21'l1"E a distance of 24.44 feet; 7. 546"09"47"E a distance of 188.67 feet; 8. 555"48'16"E a distance of45.29 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar, 9. S62'37'05"E a distance of 33 1,4 1 feet to a 1/2-inch rebari 10. S49'07'Oi1"E a distance of 149.42 feet to a 1/2-inch re har; 12, 547"33'25''E a distance of223,36 feet; 12. SW34'10"E a distance of 104.95 feet; 13. S59`52'47JrE a distance of 94,86 feet; 14. 555*32'370E a distance of 460.70 feet to a point on the northerly line of the southeast 114 of said Section 31; Thence leaving said line and following said northerly line, N89'57'WE a distance of 390.76 feet to a brass cap marking the east 1/4 corner of said Section 31; Them-e leaving said northerly line and following the easterly line of said Southeast 1J4,S0W33'224E a distance of le372.93 Feet; Thence leaving Bald easterly line, M99' 42'21"W a distance of 63.22 feet to a point on the westerly right- of-way lirEe of S_ Locust Groin Rd.; Thence following said westerly right-of--way line the following nine (9)courses' 1. 500'17'39"W a distance of 97M feet; 2. S89'42'21"E a distance-of 18.14 feet; 3. S21'07'21"E a distance of 18,06 feet; 4_ _5W32'22"E a distance of 3 17.11 feet; 5. 50VW4.rW a distance of 94.42 feet; 6. S00"32'22"E a distance of 91.20 feet; 7. 524`46'04'W a distance of 28.23 feet; 8. N89'42'21"W a distance of 3.19 feet; 1_ 500*17'39"W a distance of 1.50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said descrlption contains a total of 131.89 ac,res,more or less, Attached hereto is Exhibit B and by this reference is made a part hereof, , 1 1f.5 or ILL_ 10 . 'f - of PAGE 3 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits I Q�Q C7� �f7 I o � I z r M WCD w - m I I MTF � I III I I ro RHE ° Q Emn z zo I—z + W" � f4 Locust Grove Rd. r � , km z 0 0 E N G I N E E R I N G 5725 N.71H UINCRTRY WAY 00:115E,�Mb UR3M PHONE 4748I fi54E%39 Exhibit 9- Apex Farr-Subdivision An4n�llp cool DA Modification � CAiE: lure Yd2� PBNeCT: 7L-7aa SHEET: Situated in a portion of Section 31,T,3N,,RIE,,XM-, 1 OF 4 City of Meridian,Ada County, ID City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits ,f,3 L1 S4009'47'E 1 B9,67' D� S55'41'16'E ,q�, 45.29, I GONE 25—FT MUTRWE5TERLY 54-747'4d"E OF CENTERLINE OF THE 149.42, I'll- FAM LATERAL 94733'25"E 94,86' 554'34"1 CIE 5 5J , 4' NB9'57'56'E MUNO 9E'ASS GAP E. 1f4 CORNER SECTION 31 tf Ira lei � L ! N a.+ N48's4'M-W u�r N4758'33)N 251.11'N ' 0 400 goo 1200 La � L3 N99'42'2114 La Plan Stile- V=400' 13G.4D' Lib nc> N0417'3+2'E G� 67.30' L1q FApoxorthwest _ ` 42'21"E sion No.2 t - L LM 118742'21'W L25 "a N(~ rJ��'.�• YS ifs I III { POINT OF BEGINNING Apex Northwest N89.42'21'W i Subdivi5lon No. 1 87•25' (TEE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT E. Lake Hazel Rd,T.3w. R IF-3i 3a km ENGINEERING T.2rd., .1E. 6 5 5725 NWH 015COYERYWAY UME,iP#HP p}7L� PHONE Ito)op- " Exhibit B-Apex Farr Subdivision W°''fk{"" L)A Modification 6n7E� lu8r]PYi ' PBQIECf: 73-7�,6 SHEET: Situate+ in a portion of Section 31,T-3N.,R.1E.,B.M., 2 OF 4 City of Merid1ano Ada County,ID City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits % % E < ? \ \ $ 6 ; < 3 < 8 § w ' L-7 =� 7 �z Kj L , P a § 2 T § G § / § }) | / \ _ £ _0 � �22 � � §@ � § d � §§z e d rn � �§ h�2 a . $§ /§ N. eke - — §- � - - — � �a � _� — — — — ) _ z& KR§ § _ o fqP *' \\ �& � �Ln t / 2 � ( § §� ? S | _ _ TP §k 2 � } , © k j % ƒ | � � � , S wi Z ENa1NEERINa _ n._RYWAY 713 CI� � Exhibit B - Ap@x Fa t Subdivision kme® DA VodMt%n ! DATE: a__. | .RC*"CT, mm § Sites Gd » a �mo,G mon ] �3 , %lErBm, 3 OF 4 City of M@Hd§m County, g City of Mell*pI Department Re o4 V11. Exhibits LINE TAKE LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DFSfANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N3T31'OG-H 11.71' L14 500'3$'1?V 30.20' L2 NB4'43'06'W 1.54' 05 S61'21'11'E 24.44' L3 57721'17-R 24.92' L18 N89'42'21"W 63.22' L4 Ne8'42'21V 47_154' L17 500'17'34JW 87.59' f.5 N139 4'3-c6-W 44,82' L10 599'42'21% 113.14' L6 N44'07'12'W 21,37' Li4 521'0721-E 18.06' L7 SOR'02'451 31,50' L21 S0545'44"W 94.42' LB N00'20'36E 24.96' L22 SW3212�E SIM' L9 S25'53'WW 7.65' L23 S24'4E'04"W 28.13' Lip 592'35'12-W 8.1W L24 NB9'4212N 3.19' L11 S475S'07% L5.40' L25 SW17'3911' L12 519'52'31'W 12,12' L13 M'07'29'E 9.75' CURVE TABLE CURVE FLADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD ERG CRORD r el 9_00' 14.14' 90'064-7- $44517'1651 12,73' C2 90.00' 50,41' 48MB'12" S66'12'47"N 48.94' C3 311.50' 198.52' SY20'56" N22'16'05'* MAR' k C4 261_56' 226_D1' 44'31'13" N65'17'09-H 219.04' CS 58.00' 48.99' dw23'S6" S22'46'16"E* 47SS' i CB 58a-00' t61.54' 15-44'26" S62-1547-E I al.03' : km i r Y t i 1 f L h 4 r F E N G I W E E R I N G L s}2S WIRTH OISCIWIFLY WILY BLd4-IDAHO SP13 s PHONE I209)M-C 3B Exhibit B-Apex Farr Subdivision DA Modification k Plue: !inr 2a2A r PRQlEC1: 21t�B SHEET: Situated in a portion of Section 31,T.3N., P.1E.,S.M., 4 OF 4 City of Meridian, Ada County, ID City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Rezone Legal Descriptions &Exhibit Maps im. 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOLSE,ID 83714 I 2O8.639.6939 I FAx 208,639.6930 April 30,2024 Project No.21-248 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-8 Apex Farr Subdivision A Parcel of land being a portion of Lot 1,BIOck 5 of Shafer View Terrace Subdivision(Book 128r Pages 20722-20730,records of Ada County,Idaho)and further situated in the Northeast 114 of the Southwest 114 of Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 1 East,B-M-,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho and being more partfcularly described as follows; BEGINNING-at a 5/$-inch re bar marking the Center 1f4 corner of said Section 31,which bears H89'57'15"E a distance of 2,507.62 feet frorn an aIurninum cap marking the West 1/4 rorner of said Section 31,thence fallowing the easterly line of said Southwest 1f4,540'17'55"W a distance of 270.83 feet; Thence leaving said easterly line,8,54 feet along the aTrofa cWularcurve to the left,said curve having a radius of 2I30.0D feed,a delta angle of 01'44'51",a chard hearing of N39°39'o7"W and a chord distance of 8.54 feet; Thence N40•31'33"W a distance of 241.33 feet; Thence 198.79 feet along the arc of a circular curve to the left,said curve having a radius of 230.00 feet a delta angle of 49'31'13,a chord bearing of N65'17'09"W and;a chord distance of 192.66 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Southwest 114; Thence fallowing Bald northerly line,N891715"E a distance of 338.68 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Said parcel contains a total of 0.758 aCreS,more of Iess- Attached hereto 6 Exhibit R and by this reference Is hereby made a part of. ,.. 124 59 D OF L. ENGINEERS SURVEYOR$ PLANNERS City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits POfNT OF BEGINNING CENTER 1/4 CORNIER SECTION 31 Iw FOUND 5f8" REBAR Proposed Apex Farr I r Subdivision BA515 DF BEARING 36 31 NI99'S7'1 25d7.fi2' 2168-94'� N89-57'16-E 339.68' tit Rezone Area:0.758}AC. Portion of R7824251260 I WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 3E Current Zoning; R v FOUND ALUU114UM CAP Propmed Zoning: Proposed Apex Farr Subdivision Proposed Apex West Subdivision � I Shafer View Terrace Subdivision CURVE:TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DfLTA �HORDBRG CHORD C1 280-00' 6.54' 1'4-4'51" N39'39'07"W 13,54' C2 230.00' 199.79' 49'31'13" 1465'17'09"W 192.66' 0 100 204 300 Plan Scale 1"=100' ENGI NEE FLING 029 r4OKFH DiSO0,Mr WAY MSS-MAKIB9713 P"E4208.% .;9-ae3s Exhibit B - Rezone to R-8 kn--wilp,coot ,apex Farr Subdivision DATE April toes vWAU: 21-249 F HEEr: A portion of the Lot 1, Block 5 of hafer View Terrance in the NE 1/4 1 OF 1 of the SW 1/4 of Sec_ 31,T3N, R1E, BM, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho HEET: City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits km 9233 WEST STATE STREET I BOISE,ID 83714 1 203.639,45939 FAX 208.639.6930 April 29,2024 Project No.21-249 Exhibit A Legal Descripdon for Rezone to C-C Apex Suhdnrision A parcel of land situated in a portion of the Southeast 114 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,B.M.,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and being mare particularly destrlbed as follows; Commencing at an aluminum cap marking the southeast corner of said Section 31,which bears S00.32'22"E a distance of 2,700.07 feet from a brass cap marking the east 1/4 corner of said Sectlon 31, thence following the easterly Iine of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 31, N00'32'22" a distance of 6130.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 'thence leaving said easterly line,N89'42'21"W a distance of 470.05 feet; Thence NNY16'52"E a distance of 623.25 feet; Thence S6942'21"E a distance of 461.12 feet to said easterly line of the Southeast 1/4; Thence fallowing said easterly Iine,SW32'22"E a distance of 62 3.3 2 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 6.662 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit 8 and by this reference is hereby made a part of. Cx� JC 129 ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS I PLANNERS City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits a! 32 U7 $ m SECTION @ ! | [ | FOUND Bm2 GP Pro d & x r - s u i,,A k n Ln ) 7 E. Crescendo St. 2« «17 qt 2' Proposed Apex Fa rr % subdiv>on 2 2 (% § new»: E AC- f m _ 6 L Portion51131449000& q§ Gd La 10 §) ƒ 2 _ r2m ni : %!s R 0 a y § § <k / o ! m�: CC / ® 27 7 2 ¥�E n z b 2 CL CL k 0� 2 « 2 @ QU § Q V3 \ � ITN OF ( E. Phenomenal S! BEGINNING | 42»9 & ' § G� Apex § Northwest ©| SubdiViSlion N$ cQ 1 | % § POINT OF COMMENCEMENT $ SOmHEALST CORNER gUIIA( 2 FOUND ALUM& »R - E �k�dI . I3N, RAE!! A N § — — — T.2N �E § 5 $ O ! D 4km / ■ NGINEE ■ , NG n le: a 15§ \ m,__mom._ QWS� Exhibit B . Rezone C kmcrolpcom | DATE- Apex Fa R Su bd ivsbn [ET—A poR±n of the SE1 4 ofthe5E 4 DfSection 3 SH } 1 OF 1 T3N, RIE, BV, Qty of V@Adam Ada County, Idaho City of Mell*pI Department Re o4 V11. Exhibits km 4233 WEST STATE STREET I B015E,ID83714 � 208,539.5939 � ��+7{208,639.6930 April 29,2024 Project No_21-248 Exhibit A Legal Description for Rezone to R-8 Apex Farr SubdTvTsTon A parcel of land situated in a portion of the South 112 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 31L,Township 3 North, Range 1 East,B.M., City of Me rid iartr Ada County,Idaho and being more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a 518-inch rebar marking the Center 114 corner of said Section 31,which bears S89'57eWW a distance of�,501.37 feet from a buss rap marking the East 1/4 corner of said Section 31" thence following the westerly line of said Northeast 1/4, NOW1817"E a distance of 1,11236 feet to a point un a line being parallel to and 25-ft southwesterly of the centerline of said Farr Lateral; Thence leiWng said westerly line and fallowing said lire parallel to the Farr I,ateraI the following fourteen (14)courses: 1. S63"55'51"E a distance of 137.97 feet; 2. S57'14'14"E a distance of 113.95 Peet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 3. 572'17'39"E a distance of87.22 feet to a 1/2-Inch rebar" 4. S78'53'58"E a distance of439.81 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 5. S75"55'10"E a distance of 99.84 feet; G. SG1°21'11"E a distance of 24.44 feet; 7_ 546'09'4rE a distance of 199.67 feet; 8_ 555°48eIVE a distance of 45.29 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 9. S62'37eWE a distance of 331 41 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 10. S49°07000'"E a distance of 149.42 feet to a 1/2-inch rebar; 11_ S47'33'25"F1 a distance of 228.36 feet; 12, 554'34'1U"E a distance of 104.95 feet; 13, S59°52'47"E a distance of 94.85 feet; 14. 565"32'37"E a distance of460.70 feet to a paint on the southerly IIne of said Northeast 1/4; Thence leaving said line and following said southerly line, 5W57'55"Val a distance of 2,210,b1 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains a total of 31.272 acres,more or less. Attached hereto is Exhibit Band by this reference€s[Hereby made a part of. (,J E T 42 0 ow or L. B ENGINEERS C SURVEYORS I PLANNERS City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits Proposed Apex Fa rr SubdiQsi nn mr38'17% 11196' — � � §\\ m2 10/ =n = = q_q / q \ t L m /§ - /k c � Ul §§\\ rq mg & � 2 = tMQ / 7 7/ Vt rb I Ul / # Ln 0. \ 9 6 J « & aj �g § 22 / o s n ch -4 z \ / / e Mid 4Lm 0 b f A / — { 0 � Jt@ � « hy \>1 q \ / �jj I �$ § )A — c w } \ P\ kt �2 7 _ cube § E § �0 r4 c e, _ « knoe [ F m 3 �£Rt F � / / m§ f t )Z ® 4 \ \ 62 k\ NZ LE) §w �km § G y Locust Grove Rd. £ N01NEE ■ IN0 _PA)Fk»m=m._ b bit B-Rezone 8 ©pc— Apex R Subdivision � _,_ m: r_ SHED A portion of the South 2 of the North 4 of Sewon 31, 1 OF 1 T N. R1E, Bm. Ot Df Meridian,Adams unty, Idaho City of Meridian Report VI! Exhibits E. Preliminary Plat(date: 5/1/2024)&Phasing Plan e� I x h= 3 �S om 4d� W� a I ;z a ' H�ca o o m 0 I a s mo Z) -Z_ Zu-2 E-- ------ cCWoc� x � a ° 2i F a Rol hg �aa e F, s �� ��! III as �_. stl 3g iia�i. e- � '; iss� - R••' a � � j a g� IN � ..� o a a K I � OtH t i R t. 1 t � City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits Ir @F r gig - Ilk /I -- �p - _ ea � City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits It iii BBB g4 9 Sv�e lA •' `:. 4: ` -- B �� �- - wig w--�—_�_�'. ._'•'Y;;,^ .X( '','•' k � °e`�t-��, � ,$'�'d!GCS�04:�9�Og_Cg QO �Dg� �� : ' •�``��: � "' ne a O n9 9 ;' s al �_�'--- - u: �f--- ag � fir• _ �! w Cg�o�tl�4gog cg o�tl�4 &11@110 go�4� e s� �. h M W 8 8 4 T4 x�N ol L"ll Aemse� i �: � � R o�� City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 9® aP 9 x ❑ x ya3} ,% � 3 C�i� t a ■ e 41 Y .y A ai CD 4 01 A g a Cg w �! d (0 �� _ " Oct z al a = ----- as _ ®j ®p C� 9 -�,' �8- '4w, All - RC: _ lltl[[-J�: .. Cie 51 y�.9p ss AS a;: ell. ol6, Y l A ' - i a C7 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits If � sF e � S x x m—� �o ! � y • S rg Cj LU di U NIg OS S 8:: a �C I•$ G�j � '� �«. ,� � ice, � �R. � W 1 ®a Ocs I t ®� cal 1 aS w v 1 C ° 's y w Im.. n� m.. inn �e •• x- m+. m.. m�. ?.. x� I 8 cl $ A 1 " v - 1 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits N =6.NIv.lI5e» IP aF l 5 O g o. S•9 �� � g , r I 1 �•_�_----�"� ... � IDS"' '�n ^$ CgPo a� A �lb 'elf, : X. y.. -- -----� —r�--- . . . . . — --- — __ Ldd 133H5 335-3NIl HJ1tlW F _� I City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits 9 � Ia ys a6 :P 12 vF a 2 O Nil m yx w Q I 1 _ — fr' R al __J PR •' L•♦ I 1 -.� [rc�- rw�[ µw xr< ,ao� n[[ ma po[: wr��: rir .wn ss`[ .retie , —o— _�•: -x'�3 °�� ��'9 ��9 ��e H�'� °�+'� a®g �c9��.��® � spI� ��e B a mr lo—,t—1 o •I � yH I I I -TT---T----T---T—T- - - - I I I I I I I City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits Phasing Plan: a°a � ki c c I c a „mow o o v I ° I e # --- ice--=--- II I — Traffic Calming—Bulb Outs and Choke Points: �' MM 4 u + -- } }• P uu�Y d # b } b # G \ # Q F b # p � 6 O-0 O ¢� + # 4+ I City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits F. Common Driveway Exhibits 9-zS.L71,309 zE 2gu,WQNO"w0 \} n ml�ra� ,w % )) {2 N�wem,a x¥ / §§ � _ « � §m� .eel ®���■ _ �--/\- -----\ \ - --« /§[ . � I >m. } .� ` I 3 0 / e k \_ � � R 12 of `��\ /\ K3ff � � • « �\« + : - : _ � � —51� G\r __. § m.i � §■ / » , § — — - �` u 2& PRESSURE __> ` . K§:! M$§ m_m�BE §mN®|! \ s B� f!§K a= fed!§ _ ,\ ) � -� ^k § S City of Meridian Department Rep o4 V t Exhibits OZ-SG SiOl L)U019 21 p * K S1191HXI 31Hl1❑140INI140? W€ pr w a oMd01"NviaN31A �g � CL ! o� No1SIld09f s,d,dvA x3dv �� 7a z 0 Fmq • �FY ZZ�JQ W W 2 I 97 ,cam 4 .6�- , �I I I m� = �� J. p4 z4m COMMON» 2d I v .. DWE IT S.TRA NSCEN6 AVE, � zo l SIDE O 3 _ I .-i MOM- �1 -:d i� � wI 11 ,Zt I J 4 ao 20, � a�3 m 10, o �oHo� rr w o •' I I i 10, PRESSURE ASEMENT ToBE DETERMINE6 T� RNAL PLAT City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits SE-bE ? 51I8IH7(3 3AIaq NOWWb:) W s a � dy WRCF w �Y OHV(31'NVlal83W ?g NOISIAla9ns uuvA x3dV z * L PRESSURE IRRIGAMON EASEMENTBE TO BE DETERMINED AT FINAL PLAT I SOE cc � , s C 'n DL _ � 6poinpz x=� c72olail SIDE- NLL Q� ¢3 I � E.SKYBORN DR. s S14E� in y I I � ❑i s: SIDE '- J & COS, 95'�D Ua -1 SIDES s Q mw zm o 3w O SfDE� j1J M z 9-9 L 12' O N p o�NO O II m J I —L---� sIDE-------- O ------- RL — — ----- PI PI PI PI R PI PI PI R ip W am4 (]Dag i R lGGn]]��4 � o a City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits O M,ryry ss-Es sioi zt Tools 51181H7C3 3RI210 NOWWO3 WAR Ln w o� OHtl01`NVl(llH3W �g a �s pryy �pM• _ zW� f m ��s rf/ i% ® � \�♦ \ r 12 v iS :n 4: X CL LK m mm �m e' 7 ® 12 10 ❑ow =3Ne CQ 20' m yoc�wa� U cD'a oo� �,p�P M.p M.P A�8 Alo A1,8 r S.EXALTE U AYE. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits .,,. 9L-TL S101 ZT NIGIG = 51I8IH7C3 3Alaq NOWWaa60 .c n NpISIAHJUM HHVA XJdtl -'•NM`CNN I I 1 8 I � I a 12' u] ..��� �a•9 S m02 O 4 p lYld lVNlj lV Z 03NIIV?J3130 39 Ld i Ol E lJ5V3 SIN _ c N NOl lS DITJaI 32Jf15S3id r SIDE ICI Q, �• I i2' 0 in' 2u� I _ I JSIDE1� I — - s I SIDE 1�`` •.��i.. �•_ �tiz�� Q 10. f =ice �0 II g z w�a Isl 12 1n� O a N1 s\ oo J" r 4 f ry I I 9 9 s © any f �4a 5 N o co a '/ .� / VI sloe �/ / �, � f a / Q MII City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits V pfH�A.ry 01-L Slal 9T A3al8 = q o * . 6 S1181HU 3AWO NOWlNO3 W A R . K NOIswOens aatl3 X3dtl 1 cd � I I I Isl WY� I I 5mW❑ a 'IR �� Sasso 14 I C]_Wm 1 o' s PRESSURE IRRIGATION '3Atl a31W3ad'S / EAS- TO BE ETFRuI ss lJ � ERUINEO AT ..,�:.•.. FINAL PLAT _ y. ~3AWO .az 510E NOWWo7 I I o N c R 3Jtl}Jyj� mod � of o+ I of r mNw 5 I-�.S S Y a o�z vj a Om mz ao� is a l O= II �WF am4 C� F �OpgJ o��3a City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits G. Private Street Areas 1 and 2 - I x \" O A� G �� 9 a, i 49 + a ±\cam ;'��A� '�'y�' f a e' �;,,:• �a•� -a �„ ,,� 4 —tj ic ,g R - S s S ,a.. � - ---- _�---�--- -- :T4+: =.ram-74s-T��r�__��':• mti�• --- - - r-- I�--`- em 33H f '�, h'Zdd15335-3NI1HO17W ' — — --- City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits ar a S z `�,y - s v 3 x o r, o o_g m q ' y5� LLSf z I I- 1 I_• 1 ll �- '- 1 I I � I I x 1 A 2) (4 a®A ®A lei, e ' a® i o 'J �A M wA e tA ®A AA a a� ' A g a I I ell _ � s q�7 I Y� -T—T"��-TT- ---- I I I I I I I I I I 1iy �— City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits e®®®A©o®0®0®®®®©ease®0a©aa00000oo©00a pOpp901100101® : 00000ao - OBBA000®G®0@AA®oOAAooA9o9AA©00000A09®= - �11111100000000900011111111111111011 � - • = �000000000000000000000000000000Igloo m00000 01111111 ©0099110111� � ��: :: - -������������������I�������� ����- .®111111111 ������- •- �11191111A11 _ ®©mm®�mmmmmmmmm■ommmmam®■moommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmammm© oame©�meeeeeeem0oemmmoe®�eoommmmeveeeeeemmemammm® - ."®®©oOOCOCOC000000A9AG00©00®■OBAGI�0�C99oC9�o000o ®0000000000�000■■0���®0®■■■■0�0000000000omoo0mmm= . d _ MEE ma LEA SIR i H min T . =p gar �N_ G � � � � e� a ®i a���a3g � s#4#,���@ ��a= � �s y � � � � ❑ @Cgp 6 44 @ii M� s � i•� @eA�' b§ ��. 3- �`s�e ii5-§#� ���'' � S� 5 ; �5 3 � F 1 gaa GCXDO _ 0 � Hi i il � �BFg gp�Y�o agFg�tl� a 9 ����� p��� �-' •• O m 1� yr o'Ilk t l I. o W ° I ... = - 8 w E a o w'♦ City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits � '� �$� ���fi� � �� �a �� �S �'� L � 9�§����y pe�� �EUCi�i^3 gE�a:�x��y��a� dY�a�S•�4�$ ��$2��G ! C � �• k b H v�0a Opo 22 S 101 (DOOO i N Oz a / t I od i bk • I . ® p _ ar �• I 4 Q iao n ° a LU ® ry a� City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits � � gg pp§u� ggug gg 3 � s y 3 $s"�� 9g§ € � � 1' a 3� r� �&� ¢��€" � S`d g�Y cgs gs;.g a. f y 9 y ka g e; 65'=_i 11 0 O� 1 €ie 9r e�a e �as$7," ei 3 11�9. �ganlul I H, ? k p H J o 00 1r'-- f" y 2~ i€ 1 F g g yea o Ily E. .... c-ate•:.-: _ -.tea.. r� D r ® ® m ® ® lb i e D � � f 1 f u O I i f1 1 r J ' I LLJ 1� r City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits Fencing Plan: w' a P ¢a y�8 ¢O� aa� y' xga e e G € tl�tl Y -e 5 5 5 9 @ 4 1 0 @ PI HVIIIII '/ x• �V -I� I 1, GOD qP 9 ! m Q9 CL uj :9 z re W W CC 0 — a amomarve� EmomUc•�U City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits pp =1 Q Q Quo@ a s h YR !fb G w 7 a Y I F Rs � la #E o L a H a to 00 y A Q 6 q R�� i s gIF � loi E IQ sP a s A i3, ! if ` Qf F --- s a a n efEi F � S + lei � z Lr7 aQQ9 �, ❑ ------- O 0 R3 !Q I 5 J.i 9 11Q 0 0 0 City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits ®m0ommememmmemmmmmm000cmom0am0ammam0ommmm�1111 -IN OIIIIII� ® ® music � g=� illllllllllllli iI�11N1111 i� 0 1 � a 'l.11llllllllllli��Illllm t�; [ - a� EIIIIIIIIM oilii �� Sol 21' �7 Q C. B 4 � J. Pathway Exhibit >r x l T 35:11RJif�iCil'; City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits K. Overall Conceptual Development Plan 7 '�� �i [/��] �:' - _ _.':dal•. Rr +' _ �- - x w f• ~-�'`�—i I 03 nx anox�,smm's - I '1 , Z {!. 1 Vim.II�• �C �:f��i���r.a I �II��FII I �•".. � aE •ox llrlar3w�s _ City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits L. Conceptual Building Elevations for Residential Units no ■No o n ■■ � =. _—-- 31 NO ME y. wommma r A 4■■m~� ••■■ 1 r ,a r City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation Apex Farr Preliminary Plat Meridian City Council October 8 t " , 2024 Apex Farr Overview BRIGHTON PINNACLE — Summary * 1 . . • hfph C4�`� } . . mu CL 11 f"; ri1il i win _ Wpllllll�M1111113 = Mni =_ x 5 F MlYMENT r FLUURE " ML Y i ( �a i ' ;" b • • • - � " F,JTUFE FUTURE it 11 l C M �: ' L rill �. ISErUTUff �1 ill DIVILOPMEW --, FUTURE MIELOPMENT i_ 49411- BRIGHTON APEX FARR - Overview t-y�d a a ,�, I �hfOh C4�`� � . • ..IIIIIIIf1119,�1111111111:�� �� - - .. Y. - WJ1111111�f1111I11—_ I Iwo a.�w !' 11111� ___ • alll��IIIIIII �, ,p �{ ape ML / F' i s Z�:Z�F,JTUFE FUTURE 1 III 1,11 All rUTUff � 11ll s, DIVILOPMENT All FUTURE DMLOPMENT ME t ,� h1111 j•,� -- BRIGHTON Preliminary Plat • . � ���� IN kill Ida sm. • • • • • . r PREVIOUSLY APPROVED Sri jr PHASES M w i V o! ��� �111111111��;IIIIIIIM� �, '�"� IIIIIIIII' ;Illilllll� - 49411- BRIGHTON Zoning and Future Land Use Request to Rezone nr ct � � -: Approximately 29.9 acres " an currently zoned R-4 and 0.8 acres from R-2 to R-8 designated as Medium Density Residential on the FLUM_ Requesting rezone to R 9 r F. 29.9 acres from R-4 to R-8 ° 5 . 3 acres from R-15 to C-C .' Approximately .8 acres Approximately 5.3 acres currently zoned R-2, and currently zoned R-15 and designated "Low Density designated as MU-C on Residential' on the FLUM. � 1� the FLUM. Requesting Requesting rezone to R-8. ` rezone to C-C. Previously shown on "Apex *% West" Subdivision as "Future R-$". � E Bra � Y y �• 7 55 d ` E Mair PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES ltie�tioU1, d - y _ _ _ 7 BRIGHTON Site Specific Constraints Irrigation laterals rrrAN-ti ti ' _ • - - . • . - - RR.rM10mMs".RK , 4.HwMrr!4FrMr ii,ti WA • • • • . . . p aw �IIL LIS r BRIGHTON Community Features i�'�'���1� • " • - *Amenity locations subject to change 11111111111 = ! All amenities within K0111111 oil � �.-- - Pinnacle are accessible �-- to all residents. �F I y TM a ` • NO 9 11 to! , 9 49411- BRIGHTON Community Features New Amenities - Intertwined Natural and Concrete Pathways with -' L Adjoining Amenities Education Gardens ` 4 do Natural Play Areas FPA .:� Est:�--, ,y„�, - . .. �..• � 15 , — , r� *4� ,;4. .- i'►� ¢y. * . °7F': '^`�3 rye ,7 - — � " 10 i -;� BRIGHTON Community Features CommunityNew Amenities ( cont. ) Pool and Clubhouse b, Outdoor Dog Park f.' y'f�x E K+�y f,. a r,• ,n T���. '9 nA.. y l �, uHo � c713171l5O0 I I�I iL 111l7C1fO 1 }A 57. •�a�1 � I 1 BRIGHTON ~ `4 ncooxicu C� '� 51131bW 2[q 1 I I to Ow LLC _--._ �l I TTCo gn`ILC I 1 sFFSFiaFxa ' •' 5131LL)1116 1 Y I + p &AM 1 UC6 4rUALATS1 l1MIFIF1Q142O2a RnF I ■EV OCWE g p q O - Twcr ssunsluu Phasin 0 o a O 6 I �w 0 0 FJwrT 4�4 � m 4 � O .. _ a p Q 9 a Q LM1 sunwtrm i *Subject to Change 6 9 O �' � •�. I rAiiFfl]�S - a a , ¢ �} o o cs �•ti —r ° o q 4 4 Y I O ,tod 4 @ 0O � ~� � 4 9I— o a Narrnuu+ �I F o a 4 a o fl a 0 0 0 r� � psExmSF O � � ci 0 4A 5T 1 T M1►VLIIALAIIh'1V1i�AY, �� O O ' p 4 _ 7 5 h4 I p O O O p t _ ff 14Y � PAFxIRIF1eANT FLAT iFLip 5 44 $ Z [n 31WSF ulnrEstah[s ti O 44 p aba,nslow 1 o C o 0.0 4 �4y FLTLIIE 1 1 1 ■ AY[HITY PwOPO$EOAPF% 1 Y1O7 Djl Fx gOATn,Z;T NMTI! mK' wlomva�H9.+ 5 ultp%"l0N%n — H 1 ix>o I IRa! - 3 A+(l YIM11rWFST � I *■ wlwrlscL�Hn.r � `� ' 0-M --° 12 -;� BRIGHTON Outstanding Items dp t • • • 1■11 1.,■1111 _. L • • - n ;! �I� � �� -�� '�.' t'r1 - lbw • � :y I �. ,p + ML i5r tar ftt rr a E FUTURE 11gill 1 ..'�� FUTURE = i = �_ i doll Y Road I - ength BRIGHTON Site Specific Constraints Irrigation Laterals � Q .CGC J1111111111 " Ak 1=,r! r� mm 11 o11111111111 �" * . VA \ 44 +* l 0140 1S =s sy y r a HIM � 1i11� ��� �1� E r � �N ���� ��� ����i �_ ► mile III111111� LIIIII�IIIi. _ _ w — a IllllllillIlllllliMlla,� — j .� A1MI1111111.111mm 1111 � AAAAAAA�'llllllll II��IIIIIIIJIIIIIII� 1111F '�111111111;(._ _, __ m�i 111111111� �111111111!rt WIN ■,� I� Approximately f j Emergency • • 652 Feet 1131235 ONE LLC Access Road 1i31210 Connection ARTIM REVOCABLE cX Lf UST S1131131330 Clp�C _ . • - - . o °' _ Approximately • Intersection 1090 Feet - - • - Traffic ' \ LEAVITr I_ { "choke" S1131142220 I • • - a , ' x Approximately o � 850 Feet (D a O • 131142260 - . • • • • 0 }� Trafficl X IX•15 XD611 � �:! Y•y • . • • • ° o it choke" Epp' • • • - • - o o o Ch) Intersection C7 o _ �� • • •. '• - s o - '� � ■ � 0 0 Q :� I � w Approximately x LEAVE Approximately 0 9 213 feet &e � 136Aet 0 � w ■ ■ 0 0Approximately I x V 9 162 feet ' 9 Approximately x » < tag feet e - 0 0 0 ~ MATTN Q & @ Approximately 8 h� Pathway e 9 feet + � Connection and 0 0 . , ■ , e e e e 9wtraffic "c how- @ o & o Apprxi mat @I 2 _ ■ Intersection & @ 9 . 300 feet e - ■ - ■ g � Q \ � a a O Pathway Q e , ■ - e @ @ Appr�m��y 0 @ « 0 Connection and i 5f et lmmc choke o 0 $ ¥ 0 4 ¥ \ 0 . I�mecl o , e mr(R2 . o ® m G , ® - , e - ■ ■ , ■ � �� � 0 ` Approximately ■ - ® ■ e - • 51 feet 0 ■ , , e , ■ e - e : ( All Intersection w � Sidewalk -`.- BRIGHTON Variance Request A sidewalk is required on the north side of W Precipice Drive. Due to the grade change, it will be challenging to provide the sidewalk without destabilizing the slope against the Farr Lateral. We will provide trees, grass, and other landscape elements on the north side of the street (on the slope). Both ACHD and City staff were supportive* of the road design and no sidewalk when considering the site constraints. No homes are located on the north side and only 24 homes take access from W Precipice Drive. Sidewalks and pathway connections are provided through common lots for pedestrians to gain access to amenities and commercial uses. *Per email from Mindy Wallace ACHD dated August 8th, 2024 PFVO o ® ® ® 00 lk- we 0 19 44 - BRIGHTON Farr Lateral Landscape Detail Landscaping and trees will be placed on the slope against the Farr Lateral for a pleasing aesthetic and buffer for the neighbors north of the Farr. 30.0' ESTIMATED FARR LATERAL. EASEMENT FROM CENTERLINE OF CANAL FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINE0 WITH FINAL PLAT I -19.0, -W. PRECIPICE DR. 29.0' FARR LATERAL I � FARR LATERAL I MAINTENANCE ROAD I f lit I 1 13 10. lry UTS n _ -11 �� ti5 n �, .' �. J Q 20 Block 23 Mixed Use Residential �q l ,.. j l ii i . ------� � is aMr, iir,�r� as � ati at� �— BLOCK 23 1414k Am ll s s ,� ;�� .�- - _" +�l� gal 1 �4► � 1 � K to C-C FIN r1 T x Ti 1 - pm ; ' tY� - -- I hL E BLOCK 23 Mixed-Use Figure 3D APEX FARR _ • - • Block 23 peOH l epaliv OP 75, —0 Ask • + ! ,� 4k A peon Ie)vl • • - - - • • - •; ,,, ^ a, CL vs m ar L i O -;� BRIGHTON Explanation of Buffer Paired Residentiat Code requires a 25-foot buffer between residential and commercial zones, which is met in the _ design as proposed by providing a 15-foot- wide common area mew plus 10 feet of set back equaling 25 feet of separation between the front of homes and the parking lot adjacent to p g J the C-C zone. A a y . A 24 BRIGHTON Additional Views Looking North F � 1 % i • f �J'� el '�=y„� �.kr�v"�`_'�'•.axes•' � � �`-.�•,� - t a id-ling - 1 v V 151 ��...}�'-_ 4 I�ffV� �i!•a!L..i lllif ltl � 1 r ��... i�..4n r_-. a II ��t�y ` � � Isf.e.4�ti����i,` '.�nmxn:a.-r...rM�un�niu•�unu�ium3 _ �.:. ,��� A s ► 4RR r • 1 W" '` '�' 25 Looking West kfly Ole �`. VI 14, APEX FARR BLOCK 2 -;� BRIGHTON Additional Views __ }t;Y'�-may • i, . II III�II fig1 _ good EXFARR BLOCK 23 27 COURIYARD ADDRESSESTmmn *Mr L �M► ail► i� aL Alt. JIL �� ————— --- "w► i w w► wo w► yes Mo► s s m 6196, 6202. F. .. Fi A _ 1 - North Bol%cni Line ji A 1 )m I I CAJLtq APEX FARR BLOCK 23 Conclusion -qflo- BRIGHTON Conclusion a lank �i y NIA i Avg —= �-I��I�In1i�11111�11� :-- • 11111111i �111111�.�i ��= = Hllrlli f 111111111 -: _ • • • • now - • - i�llllll,�llll II III = �� �� '•�- po u�uut�uumn �uuu��iuiu� � - • - � - � � - • - 9 B JC 9ht0n co Discussion .;� BRIGHTON Slope Information and Graphics SECTION A x� SECTION B - - = 11111111111� _� � SECTION ��11N11111111��� .11111111111IMIr1111'11 '7'�.� i �111�1111►� lilil�l�l __li;_=_ -C 49,11- BRIGHTON Slope Informationand Graphics 2755 2755 2750 2750 1 1 FARR LATERAL ' , Preci 0ice to Diary and eak: 14 Feet 2745 2745 150' LOT DEPTH Farr is on ea a SECTION A - , - 2:1 MAX. 2740 R-ocw 211r�1�70` so' 2740 27g4 - 2735 2735 ti 1 I 2730 1 11 1 1 1 1 2730 � ry ry \ EXISTING GROUNU Nr FINISHED GROUND 2725 2725 ?724 k — 2. SLOPE. RETAIN f STORMWATER WRHIN LOT r 2720 ---- 2720 + a� 2715 2715 �P�pp q 00 � �L m 4 * P q P p P p � N W 0 �O � S � O `L 4 `� �C~C���• - l`~{ d d M VNj N N N N N pN N N 6' ON 4 N ry N N N N N� N ry N N N n N N N N N N N N N � 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 n $ SECTION A 0 so 100 150 0 5 10 15 Plan/Profile Scale:1"=50' Profile Vertical Scale:1"=5' 34 44 - BRIGHTON Slope Informationand Graphics 2760 2760 2755 2755 �._ Precipice t Vertex: 1 Feet 2750 I 2:t rnAx. SD' LGT DEPTH b v%-1 ]%.In If- L I%-'k-t ISECTION B FARR LATERAL ACHD� \ p 2745 2745 P 2740 2740 � f > > 2735 � 2735 � Q EXISTING GROUND ��1k $ 31.14 FINISHED GROUND 2730 21% SLOPE. RETAIN STOR 2730 M MWRTER WITHIN LOT �+ 2725 — 2725 % # 2720 2720 — M M�2 N ip d N N N r N N N N N N N N N N N N N H N N N N 0 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 S+OD S+SD 6+ODr�� •, �- SECTION B 0 50 100 150 0 5 10 15 C Plan/Profile Scale:1"=50' Profile Vertical Scale:1"=5' 35 4941, BRIGHTON • • ' Information and Graphics 2760 2760 2755 2755 FARR LATERAL /_.. reci ice to Vertex: 14 Feet � 1 2755 150' LOT DEPTH 27.50 43' AGND '- Zo, ,0, 60, SECTION C R-O-W 2745 _ 2745 9.1 MAX. 2745 2740 r EXISTING GROUND 4 (.IJ 1,7 FINISHED GROUND W 2735 - 2735 t + 2740 � ro 29 _ 2 2730 STORMWATEROPL WITHINELON 7 2735 N 7<? �736— N 2725 2725 ti ti 2720 2720 ep 2 y 4 y W M WM M I.Nj M M 'i M M Nj II I n ^ n M1 M1 n M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 n M1 M1 M1 M1 M1 _ i+oo 1-5o 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 SECTION C 0 so 100 150 o 5 10 is 36 Plan/Pronle Scale:1"=So' Profile Vertical Scale:1"=5' SlopeBRIGHTON Information and Graphics I r I ` �~ -- T RPE1(WC5i � I � + f.[7MMl1H1iYJ� , 37 F.CRESCE1iP0 F . -;� BRIGHTON Slope Information and Graphics A LOWER%---STREET • CORRIDOR DAYLIGHT BASMENT LOTS B _ u Ia • • • •TS al . -`.- BRIGHTON Common Drive Layout for Alternative Compliance / Director Approval The common drive shown as lot 76 exceeds the maximum of 3 homes allowed on a single side of a shared drive. Lot 75 cannot take access directly from S. Elevated Way because it is a collector road. The common drive connects to o� both S. Elevated Way and S. Exalted Way, providing residents with "through" access to either f street. As per code, access to the common drive will be limited to 469 lots. 39 Oy 24.00' O 6ose'- �za..r i+s.00• 6,0745E 5,8435E y,0 19 00 �600 8 zs 0.57" I100 4,400SF a .PI 1 S OF O� 00 7� 5.43 ` l* 4,400 SF D.O 4 - 000, $ 4,400 SF 9Q 'n 6,160 SF 1 10.00' ,8 f 7s�oa• ]s.00' �g\ 700. h 16 _ M 22 0. I I 7s.00• ^ 7s.00' s 5,316 SF II 4,130 SF $ a a� o-9ry )r0 5.43' a'? �0023 . SF 4,1805E '?$ E I ]s.00• ]s.00• A N h 5,9595E L . OOQ. �, BLOCK x.czszsF $ 301E \\� r�,ry 000, ra A � 14 , , '22,936SF• I I 26xss " �. 5,9595E a• < ]s.00• 7s.00• `� O 38.00' .38.00, MOO'. 3800' < 38,00' 56.00' f � z6::6F �LL zl ^ '� 13 'v� � O `g I 7s.00' ]s.00• o 5,459 SF o o a S O w :6zssF S z6xssF 8 r 4 a 25 26 27 28 29 0 30 ? - 110.00' a I I 7s.00' 7s.00• 13.23' ip. 4,1805F 41505F 4,1805E 4,1805F 4.1805F 6,1605F $ Z65 $ 39 n '�' 3 F L6365F N 6,1865E @ 12.97 3.� I 7s.00• 7s.00• 43.57' v 52.42' 38-00' 30.00' 38-00' 30,00' 38.00' S6-00' Zi92 xws7sF $ 35 LL �u.00' _ p , 3,6355E n24.0 _ 44.39� �9.21'g - .. a n" 24.00' 7s.00' 7s.00• 57.98' 38.00 38,00' 38.00" 38.OD' 38.00' 38.00' 38,00' 38.00' 56.00' x zFasF 8 36 7s.00 7s.00• p 25"9 N G O 4 o g o 9 O �p 0 155 RZa � R� 37 230.00' G � x,9I55F - 10 � ;mmO p� �O oO �� QO O1 rn 3-50' 6,377 SF 4,150SF 4,I80SF 4,180 SF 4.180 SF 4,189 SF 4,150SF 4,180SF 4,180 SF 6,074 SF Rs. ° F a - //Dean FwscM6rvi suem .o .a xzoo uoo'� 31.71' 31.42' 39.29' 38.00' 38,00' 38.00' 38.00' 38.00' Moo, 38,00' 38.00' 36.00' s0 13 o 13 v e xo e Q� De t I Im z]sasv�x.cxos� i6zosF z,6usF 46v sF z.s6,sr I I____ V Y ,s oa Irl S.TRANSCEN❑AVE. 25.72' s,00' z3.00' z3oo z3.ao' zs.00 _ssoo' I - r---t -;� BRIGHTON Living Choices 1" LLI kF 4-1 Z..0. fk _ r, - '° ' Conventional Single- Family ..- - Homes -;� BRIGHTON Living Choices n. .�s 'are..., •�. �LOW � Single-Family Paired Homes Ell LLr BRIGHTON Living Choices ,•� y h. �✓M� , � � �'v ti' :;ell.µ � .! „��'. a ' Carriage Lane Homes W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing continued from September 17, 2024 for Blayden Subdivision (H-2023-0043) by Bailey Engineering, located at the south side of W. Chinden Blvd. and west side of N. Black Cat Rd. Application Materials: https:Hbit.ly/H-2023-0043 A. Request: Annexation of 38.58-acres of land with R-8 (5.90), R-15 (1.83-acres), R-40 (16.71- acres) and C-G (14.15-acres) zoning districts. B. Request: Conditional Use Permit for a multi-family development consisting of 312 dwelling units on 16.71-acres of land in the R-40 zoning district. C. Preliminary Plat consisting of 15 building lots, 7 common lots, 1 drive/parking lot and 3 other lots for future development on 35.29-acres of land in the R-8, R-15, R-40 and C-G zoning districts. PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: October 8, 2024 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 10 PROJECT NAME: Blayden Subdivision (H-2023-0043) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please provide HOA name �)LF-) T —444, 3 r 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 STAFF REPORT E IDIAN -- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1,H p HEARING October 8,2024 Legend DATE: Continued from:September 17, 2024 ff J Se P I�Pro�c= Loco?or 4Y TO: Mayor&City Council FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner Z --- 208-884-5533 SUBJECT: Blayden Subdivision—AZ,PP, CUP H-2023-0043 8 M LOCATION: South side of W. Chinden Blvd. and west Y - side of N. Black Cat Rd. in the NE 1/4 of •• Section 28,TAN.,R.1W. ERF I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant has submitted the following applications: • Annexation(AZ)of 38.58-acres of land with R-8 (5.90),R-15 (1.83-acres),R-40(16.71-acres) and C-G(14.15-acres)zoning districts; • Conditional Use Permit(CUP)for a multi-family development consisting of 312 dwelling units on 16.70-acres of land in the R-40 zoning district; and • Preliminary Plat(PP) consisting of 15 building lots(1 multi-family lot for 312 apartment units, 10 townhouse lots and 4 commercial lots),7 common lots, 1 drive/parking lot and 3 other holding area lots(1 commercial and 2 single-family residential lots)for future development on 35.29-acres of land in the R-8,R-15,R-40 and C-G zoning districts for Blayden Subdivision. II. SUMMARY OF REPORT A. Project Summary Description Details Acreage 38.58-acres AZ(to section line of W. Chinden Blvd. &N.Black Cat Rd.); 16.70-acres CUP; 35.29-acres PP Future Land Use Designation Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R)&Medium Density Residential(MDR) Existing Land Use Rural residential,agriculture Proposed Land Uses) Residential&commercial Current Zoning Rural Urban Transition(RUT)in Ada County Proposed Zoning R-8(Medium Density Residential)(5.90-acres);R-15 (Medium High-density Residential)(1.83-acres),R-40(High-density Residential)(16.71-acres)& General Retail and Service Commercial(C-G)(14.15-acres) Pagel Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 15 building,7 common, 1 drive/parking lot,and 3 other lots for future development Phasing plan(#of phases) 5 - Number of Residential Units(type 312 apartment units, 10 townhome units (+future units from the 2 single-family of units) residential lots for future re-subdivision) Density(gross&net) 17.38 units/acre(gross)overall in residential areas(i.e.apartments&townhome areas—does not include future residential redevelopment&commercial areas) Open Space(acres,total[%]/ R-15 (townhomes): 0.28-acre(or 15.2%) buffer/qualified) R-40(multi-family): 3.55 acres Amenities Clubhouse,swimming pool,covered bike storage,tot lot,dog park, community gardens&shelters,picnic areas,walking trails/pathways Physical Features(waterways, There is an open irrigation ditch along the eastern portion of the northern hazards,flood plain,hillside) boundary of the site along W.Chinden Blvd. Neighborhood meeting date 6/21/23,3/28/24,4/11/24 History(previous approvals) ROS#3215,#7002 and#10365;Lot 1,Block 1,Compton's Subdivision No. 1; Lot 2,Comptons Subdivision No.2; Lots 3-8 Block 1,Luhr Subdivision B. Community Metrics Description Details Ada County Highway District • Staff report(yes/no) Yes • Requires ACHD No Commission Action es/no • TIS(yes/no) Yes(CR Engineering) • Level of Service(LOS) Chinden Blvd./US 20-26:NA(ITD facility) Black Cat Rd.: Better than"B" • Trip Generation(estimate) c�7,809 additional vehicle trips/day(4 7 existing); 506 additional 490 vehicle tripsihour in the AM peak hour and 641 vehicle trips per hour in the PM peak hour based on the TIS. • Existing Conditions • CIP/IFYWP Capital Improvements Plan(CIP)/Integrated Five Year Work Plan(IFYWP): • Black Cat Road is listed in the GIP to be widened to 5-lanes from MCMiiian Road to Chinden Boulevard(US 20126)between 2036 and 2040. • The intersection of Black Cat Road and Chinden Boulevard(US 20126)is listed in the CIP to be reconstructed or widened and signalized between 2036 and 2040. • The intersection of Black Cat Road and McMillan Road is listed in the IFYWP to be constructed as a multi-lane roundabout with 2-lanes on the north leg,2-lanes on the south,1-lanes east, and 1-lanes on the west leg with a 2021-2022 design year,a 2027 right-of-way acquisition year,and a construction in 2028. Access(Arterial/Collectors/State There are(4)existing driveways via Chinden Blvd.,a state highway; (3) Hwy/Local)(Existing and existing driveways via N.Black Cat Rd.,an arterial street;and(2)existing Proposed) driveways via W.Larry Ln.,a local street. Proposed/Required Road Black Cat will be improved&widened as part of a future ACHD project. Improvements ACHD is requiring a southbound right-turn lane on Black Cat Rd. at the Ramblin Dr./Black Cat Rd. intersection when Ramblin is constructed to intersect Black Cat based on the TIS. Page 2 Ramblin Dr.will be constructed as a 36'wide collector street section with curb,gutter&either a 7'wide attached sidewalk or 5'wide detached sidewalk Fire Service • Distance to Fire Station 2.5 miles from Station#5 • Fire Response Time Don't have total response times that meet NFPA 1710 standards or current City adopted standards. • Resource Reliability 8 1%(does meet targeted goal of 80%or greater) • Risk Identification I (current resources are adequate) • Accessibility Meets all required access,road widths and turnarounds. • Special/resource needs Will require an aerial device; can meet this need. • Water Supply 2,500 gallons per minute for 2 hours • Other Resources Police Service No comments were received West Ada School District • #of students generated from 68 Enrollment Capacity this development Pleasant View Elementary School 679 650 • Capacity of Schools Star Middle School 951 1000 • #of students enrolled Owyhee High School 1774 1800 Wastewater • Distance to Sewer Services Directly adjacent in Black Cat Rd. • Sewer Shed • Estimated Project Sewer ERU's See application • WRRF Declining Balance • Project Consistent with WW Yes Master Plan/Facility Plan • Impacts/Concerns Flow is committed. See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Water • Distance to Services Available at site • Pressure Zone One • Estimated Project Water ERU's See application • Water Quality Concerns None • Project Consistent with Water Yes Master Plan • Impacts/Concerns See Public Works Site Specific Conditions Page 3 C. Project Maps Future Land Use Map Aerial Map Legend 0 Legend 0 leiProjeot Locator. Projeat Luca Tian xe U.se- Intene { i =A1 M F1®R Zoning Map Planned Development Map Legend �R=4 Legend 0Pro" t Lcon=, r. Project Location - i City Lino# C' R:.1 — P;onred Rams is C C-N 4 RUT R-4 iRUT ERT R- MRS A. Applicant: Judy Schmidt,Bailey Engineering- 1119 E. State St., Ste. 210,Eagle, ID 83616 B. Owners: Open Door Rentals, LLC- 1977 E. Overland Rd.,Meridian, ID 83642 C. Representative: Shawn Brownlee,Trilogy Development-9839 W. Cable Car St., Ste. 101,Boise, ID 83709 III. NOTICING Planning& Zoning City Council Page 4 Posting Date Posting Date Newspaper notification published in newspaper 7/2/2024 9/1/2024 Radius notification mailed to property owners within 300 feet 6/25/2024 8/30/2024 Public hearing notice sign posted 7/1/2024 9/20/2024 on site Nextdoor posting 6/17/2024 8/27/2024 IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS Note: This application was originally submitted in August 2023,prior to the Comprehensive Plan update in March 2024. Therefore, the guidelines in the previous version of the Plan apply to development of this site. LAND USE: The northern 25 acres of the subject property is designated as Mixed Use—Regional(MU-R) and the southern 10 acres is designated Medium Density Residential(MDR) on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant requests to be allowed to use the abutting MU-R FLUM designation on 50% of the MDR designated area as allowed for in the Comprehensive Plan when determined appropriate and approved as part of a public hearing with a land development application(see pg.3-11 for more information). The Applicant believes this extension of the MU-R designation on 5-of the 10-acres of MDR designated land will allow for an ideal and suitable mix of commercial near major transportation arterials. The purpose of the MDR designation is to allow for dwelling units at gross densities of three(3)to eight(8) dwelling units per acre. The purpose of the MU-R designation is to provide a mix of employment,retail, and residential dwellings and public uses near major arterial intersections. The intent is to integrate a variety of uses together, including residential, and to avoid predominantly single use developments such as a regional retail center with only restaurants and other commercial uses. Developments should be anchored by uses that have a regional draw with the appropriate supporting uses. For example,an employment center should have supporting retail uses; a retail center should have supporting residential uses as well as supportive neighborhood and community services. The standards for the MU-R designation provide an incentive for larger public and quasi-public uses where they provide a meaningful and appropriate mix to the development. The developments are encouraged to be designed consistent with the conceptual MU-R plan depicted in Figure 3D in the Comprehensive Plan below. Page 5 FIGURE 3D: NUXM USE REGIONAL CONCEPT DIAGRAM Single Family _ Residential Office or i G �. i l l E J Hospitality Retail or _... Service the e L Z I or Cdle tar oad a Residerdial Office Park/ ��° p�� o or Office Headquarters _ v v p — Integrated Plaza Area Retail Arterial Road Although the proposed development plan incorporates the mix of uses desired in MU-R areas,the site isn't designed in accord with the concept diagram shown above.Multi-family residential and some office uses(instead of retail or service uses) are proposed directly adjacent to US 20-26 and Black Cat Rd.,both arterial streets,rather than off a local or collector road. The mid-box retail building is planned in back of the office park away from the arterial street(Black Cat) off the collector street (Ramblin) and across the street from planned single-family residential uses—if the mid-box retail building and office uses switched spots it would create better visibility for the retail use and a better transition in uses if office were provided next to single-family residential uses—at a minimum, Staff recommends this change to the plans.Lastly, Staff recommends the plaza area planned along the south side of the collector street in the holding area is relocated to the south to better integrate with the commercial/office park and to be more accessible for the users in that area. Overall,it's Staffs opinion the uses are"swapped"from what they should be per the concept diagram above. Staff discussed with the Applicant during the initial pre-application meetings relocating the residential uses to the south and west away from Chinden&Black Cat with commercial uses along these transportation corridors instead, consistent with the MU-R concept diagram above and for better air quality for residents; however,the Applicant declined to do so. Staff acknowledges some of the difficulties in doing so include the configuration of the site,the location of the collector street though the site, and not having control of the land at the northeast corner of the development area. The City Council should determine if it's in the best interest of the City to approve annexation of the property at this time with the proposed development plan or request a re-design to be more consistent with the MU-R concept diagram above. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in all Mixed-Use areas per the Comprehensive Plan(pg.3-15): Staff analysis in italics • "A mixed-use project should include at least three types of land uses. Exceptions may be granted for smaller sites on a case-by-case basis. This land use is not intended for high density residential development alone." The proposed project includes a mix of three different land use types—residential, office and commercial(includes retail, restaurants, etc.). Page 6 • "Where appropriate,higher density and/or multi-family residential development is encouraged for projects with the potential to serve as employment destination centers and when the project is adjacent to US 20/26, SH-55, SH-16 or SH-69." The project is adjacent to US 2 012 6 and employment uses (i.e. office, retail, etc)are proposed. The office and retail uses proposed north of Ramblin Dr. are of a smaller scale, while a mix-box retail store and an office park are proposed on the conceptual development plan to the south of Ramblin, which has the potential to serve as an employment destination center. • "Mixed Use areas are typically developed under a master or conceptual plan; during an annexation or rezone request,a development agreement will typically be required for developments with a Mixed- Use designation." A site plan was submitted for the residential and commercial areas north of Ramblin Dr. and a conceptual development plan was submitted for the area south of Ramblin with the annexation request as shown below in Sections VIT B and D.A Development Agreement that ties future development to this plan and the general guidelines for mixed use developments and specifically the MU-R designation is recommended as a provision of annexation. • "In developments where multiple commercial and/or office buildings are proposed,the buildings should be arranged to create some form of common,usable area, such as a plaza or green space." The development plans depict a plaza area with amenities on the west edge of the office/retail area and a central open space with outdoor seating to the east on the north side of Ramblin Dr. and another plaza area on the south side of Ramblin. Staff recommends the plaza area on the south side is relocated in a more central location for the future office park away from the collector street for better integration and access;the concept plan should be revised prior to the Council hearing to reflect this change. • "The site plan should depict a transitional use and/or landscaped buffering between commercial and existing low-or medium-density residential development." The only existing residential uses are those at the northwest corner of the cul-de-sac and on the south side of W. Larry Ln.;single-family residential uses are proposed as a transition to these homes. • "Community-serving facilities such as hospitals,clinics, churches, schools,parks, daycares,civic buildings, or public safety facilities are expected in larger mixed-use developments." No such uses are specifically proposed in this development—the tenants of the commercial and office areas are unknown at this time.A hospital and medical offices are planned off-site in the MU-R designated area to the west; another hospital and medical offices is planned across Chinden Blvd. to the north. Although not in the MU-R designation, the West Ada School District owns the land at the southwest corner of this development where a middle school is planned. • "Supportive and proportional public and/or quasi-public spaces and places including but not limited to parks,plazas,outdoor gathering areas, open space, libraries, and schools are expected; outdoor seating areas at restaurants do not count." As noted above, a couple of plazas are proposed along with an open space area with outdoor seating as depicted on the site plan and conceptual development plan in Sections VII.B and D below. • "Mixed use areas should be centered around spaces that are well-designed public and quasi-public centers of activity. Spaces should be activated and incorporate permanent design elements and amenities that foster a wide variety of interests ranging from leisure to play. These areas should be thoughtfully integrated into the development and further placemaking opportunities considered." Page 7 Although plazas and open space for outdoor seating are proposed in the non-residential portions of the development, it doesn't appear they'll be "centers of activity"and may not be activated with permanent design elements and amenities as desired. These areas must be strategically integrated into the overall development, interconnected with meaningful points of interest,prioritize pedestrian infrastructure,be highly visible and accessible, and designed to enhance both the adjacent uses and larger mixed-use area. To ensure consistency,Staff recommends details of these areas are submitted prior to the Council hearing to demonstrate compliance with these guidelines. In the multi family residential portion of the development, the main common areas with amenities (i.e. dog park, clubhouse. swimming pool& tot lot)are located on the perimeter of the development between an internal private street and the collector street(Ramblin) and not integrated into the development. Staff recommends these common areas are relocated to a more central location within the development accessible by pathways for convenient access and for more visibility of these areas from the multi family units in accord with open space& CPTED(Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)standards—the site plan should be revised accordingly prior to the City Council hearing. • "All mixed-use projects should be directly accessible to neighborhoods within the section by both vehicles and pedestrians." Pedestrian and vehicular connectivity is proposed between the multi family and office/retail portions of the development on the north side of Ramblin; and a local street with an attached sidewalk provides connectivity between the future residential and commercial(mid-box retail&office park) uses on the south side of Ramblin. Walkways should be provided within the future commercial area on the south side of Ramblin from perimeter sidewalks with development of that area. • "Alleys and roadways should be used to transition from dissimilar land uses, and between residential densities and housing types." A private street with parking is proposed in the multi family portion of the development as a transition to the office uses to the east, north of Ramblin. A local street is proposed as a transition to commercial uses to the east, south of Ramblin. • "Because of the parcel configuration within Old Town,development is not subject to the Mixed-Use standards listed herein." The subject property is not located in Old Town; therefore, this item is not applicable. In reviewing development applications,the following items will be considered in MU-R areas per the Comprehensive Plan (pgs.3-18 thru 3-19): Staffs analysis in italics • Development should generally comply with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed-Use areas. Staff finds the proposed project generally complies with the general guidelines for development in all Mixed-Use areas as noted above. • Residential uses should comprise a minimum of 10%of the development area at gross densities ranging from 6 to 40 units/acre.There is neither a minimum nor maximum imposed on non-retail commercial uses such as office, clean industry, or entertainment uses. Residential uses comprise over 10%of the development area at 51.5%of the site at a gross density of 17.83 units/acre on the multi family and townhome portions of the development as desired. Non- Page 8 retail uses such as a coffee shop and offices are proposed. • Retail commercial uses should comprise a maximum of 50%of the development area. Retail/commercial uses comprise less than 50%of the development area at approximately 48.5010, as desired. Where the development proposes public and quasi-public uses to support the development,the developer may be eligible for additional area for retail development(beyond the allowed 50%),based on the ratios below: • For land that is designated for a public use, such as a library or school,the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say, if there is a one-acre library site planned and dedicated,the project would be eligible for two additional acres of retail development. • For active open space or passive recreation areas, such as a park, tot-lot, or playfield,the developer is eligible for a 2:1 bonus. That is to say,if the park is 10 acres in area,the site would be eligible for 20 additional acres of retail development. • For plazas that are integrated into a retail project,the developer would be eligible for a 6:1 bonus. Such plazas should provide a focal point(such as a fountain, statue,and water feature), seating areas, and some weather protection. That would mean that by providing a half-acre plaza,the developer would be eligible for three additional acres of retail development. This guideline is not applicable as no public/quasi-public uses are proposed on this site and the retail development area is below the allowed 5001o. The mix of uses proposed will provide employment and shopping opportunities for residents in the northern portion of the City and the coffee shop will provide a neighborhood and community service. To ensure this development has a regional draw and includes a mix of employment and retail uses as well as residential uses as intended in MU-R designated areas, Staff recommends a development agreement that requires future development to be generally consistent with the site plan shown on the plat and the conceptual development plan for the holding area in Section VII.D and/or as modified by City Council. Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics): • "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D) The proposed development, although predominantly multi family residential, will provide a mix of housing types consisting of multi family apartments, townhomes and single-family residential, which should contribute to the variety of housing options in this area and within the City as desired. • "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for public facilities and services."(3.03.03F) City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. • "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices."(3.07.01A) The commercial portion of the development north of Ramblin is required to provide a 25'wide buffer to residential uses along the western boundary adjacent to the proposed multi family Page 9 apartments and at the northeast corner adjacent to the existing residential property(Sexton Parcel #S0428111201). The proposed single-family residential uses south of Ramblin along the west and south boundaries of the site will provide a transition to adjacent existing residential uses. • "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land." (3.07.00) The proposed single-family residential uses south of Ramblin will be compatible with existing single- family residential uses to the west and south of this development.As discussed above, Staff is of the opinion office uses and associated L-O zoning would be more appropriate than a mid-box retail store and C-G zoning as a transition to planned single-family residential uses along the west boundary of the site south of Ramblin. A 25'wide buffer to residential uses is required on C-G zoned property, which should assist in minimizing conflicts and maximizing use of land. • "Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development. Infill projects in downtown should develop at higher densities, irrespective of existing development." (2.02.02C) Development of the subject Infill property should not negatively impact abutting existing development due to the transition in uses proposed and required buffers to adjoining land uses. (This development is not downtown) • "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A) The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems with development of the subdivision;services are required to be provided to and though this development in accord with current City plans. • "Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote neighborhood connectivity."(2.02.01D) Pedestrian walkways are proposed along all streets and throughout the development for access; pedestrian connectivity should also be provided within the future development area south of Ramblin for neighborhood connectivity. There are no pedestrian pathway stubs to this property from adjacent developments. • "Eliminate existing private treatment and septic systems on properties annexed into the City and instead connect users to the City wastewater system; discourage the prolonged use of private treatment septic systems for enclave properties." With redevelopment of the site, use of the existing wells and septic systems on properties annexed into the City should cease and be abandoned. • "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross- access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads,and promoting local and collector street connectivity."(6.01.0213) There are (4) existing driveways via Chinden Blvd., a state highway; (3) existing driveways via N. Black Cat Rd., an arterial street; and(2) existing driveways via W. Larry Ln., a local street. With development, these access driveways will be closed and access will be provided via W. Ramblin Dr., Page 10 a collector street and in the future by a local street via Larry Ln. when redevelopment of that area occurs in the future. • "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02) Development of the subject infill parcel will maximize public services. TRANSPORTATION: The Master Street Map(MSM)depicts an east/west residential collector street through the site. The eastern approximate 1/4 mile section will be constructed with this development. The developer is required to provide a road trust deposit with ACHD for half the cost of extension of Ramblin Dr. along the site's south property line to the west through the WASD property. Chinden Blvd./US 20-26, a state highway and principal arterial street,was recently widened to 5-lanes along the northern boundary of the site and will ultimately be widened to 7-lanes at some point in the future when traffic warrants the expansion.North Black Cat Rd., designated as a residential arterial street,is a 2-lane roadway along the eastern boundary of this site;no improvements are funded or planned. Black Cat Rd. is listed in the CIP to be widened to 5-lanes from McMillan Rd.to Chinden Blvd./US 20-26 between 2036 and 2040. Transit services are not available to serve this site. V. STAFF ANALYSIS A. ANNEXATION(AZ) The Applicant proposes to annex 38.58-acres of land with R-8 (Medium-density Residential) (5.90- acres),R-15 (Medium High-density Residential) (1.83-acres),R-40(High-density Residential) (16.71- acres)and C-G(General Retail and Service Commercial)(14.15-acres)zoning districts for the development of apartments(multi-family),townhomes, office,retail and restaurant(coffee shop)uses. All of the property included in the annexation area is included in the boundary of the proposed preliminary plat. A concept plan is depicted on the plat below in Section VII.B for the area north of the collector street(i.e.W. Ramblin Dr.) and another concept plan is included in Section VII.D for the holding area south of Ramblin,which is not proposed to develop at this time. As discussed above in Section IV, some changes to the development plan are requested by Staff while others are suggested for consideration by Council. Conceptual perspective drawings were submitted for the multi-family portion of the development with views from Chinden Blvd., included below in Section VII.G. The conceptual development plan for the area north of Ramblin depicts a 312-unit multi-family development with open space areas and off-street parking on the western portion of the site; 10 townhomes; and a mix of single-story commercial uses on the eastern portion of the site consisting of office,retail/office and storefront buildings ranging in size from 2,760 to 7500 square feet(s.£)with a restaurant(i.e.coffee shop),open space/gathering areas and associated off-street parking. The conceptual plan for the holding area south of Ramblin depicts mid-box retail and office park uses with single-family residential along the west and south boundaries of the development. The restaurant(i.e. coffee shop)with a drive-through will require approval of a conditional use permit in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-11 —Drive-through Establishment. At the request of Staff,a concept plan was included on the preliminary plat for the out-parcel at the northeast corner of the site,which demonstrates how the site may develop with a mix-box retail store and retail/office uses with access provided from this development(see Section VII.B). As noted above in Section IV,the gross density of the multi-family and townhome portions of the development is 17.38 units/acre,which is consistent with the density desired in NU-R designated areas in the Comprehensive Plan. The single-family residential uses planned in the R-8 district in the Page 11 holding area should have a gross density between 3 and 8 units/acre consistent with the Medium Density Residential designation in the Comprehensive Plan. A multi-family development requires conditional use permit approval in the R-40 zoning district, townhouse dwellings are a principal permitted use in the R-15 zoning district, and single-family attached and detached dwellings are a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning district per UDC Table 11-2A-2. Professional services(i.e. offices),retail and restaurant(i.e. coffee shop)uses are all principal permitted in the C-G zoning district per UDC Table 11-2B-2. The proposed lots and future development are subject to the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district, 11-2A-8 for the R-40 district and 11-2B-3 for the C-G district. The C-G district allows the largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office and service uses and is typically located in close proximity and/or with access to interstate or arterial intersections. It allows building heights up to 65 feet with some exceptions as noted in UDC 11-2B-3A.3. Staff has concerns with C-G zoning on all of the commercial area south of Ramblin with no square footages, elevations or other details provided on the concept plan. Staff is amenable to C-G zoning for the mid-box retail building if it's relocated to the east along Black Cat Rd.but recommends the remainder of the commercial area(i.e. office park) south of Ramblin is zoned L-O. The L-O district more accurately reflects the intended use(i.e. office),which is allowed as a principle permitted use in the district with a maximum building height up to 35 feet,consistent with the height allowed in the adjacent proposed R-8 zoning district. The L-O zoning will provide a better transition to residential uses and be more neighborhood friendly with limited business hours of operation. Staff recommends the legal descriptions and associated exhibit maps for the annexation are revised accordingly prior to the City Council hearing. A 25-foot wide buffer is required in the commercial zoning district to adjoining residential uses with lot development; landscaping is required within the buffer in accord with the standards listed in UDC I I- 3B-9C. There is an existing residential use on the out-parcel(Sexton Parcel#S0428111201) at the northeast corner of this site that will require buffering if the residential use still exists at the time of lot development—this is not currently depicted on the plans and should be reflected on future plans if applicable. There are existing homes and accessory structures on this site that are proposed to be removed. Removal of these structures should take place prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature for the phase in which they are located. A legal description and exhibit map for the annexation area is included below in Section VII.A of this report. This property is within the City's Area of City Impact boundary. The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-6511A. To ensure the subject property develops as proposed and as recommended herein, and in accord with the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommends a DA is required with the provisions discussed herein and included in Section IX.A.Further, Staff recommends an amendment to the DA is required prior to any development occurring in the holding area to include an updated conceptual development plan and building elevations for that area. B. PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP): The proposed preliminary plat consists of 15 building lots(1 multi-family lot, 10 townhouse lots and 4 commercial lots), 7 common lots, 1 drive/parking lot and 3 holding area lots (1 commercial and 2 single- family residential lots)for future development on 35.29-acres of land in the R-8,R-15,R-40 and C-G zoning districts. Page 12 The subdivision is proposed to develop in five(5)phases as shown on the phasing plan below in Section VII.B. The first two phases are the residential portions of the development; the third phase is the commercial(office/retail/storefront),which includes two (2)plaza areas containing outdoor seating for gathering, on the north side of Ramblin Dr.;the fourth phase is the future commercial(i.e. mid-box, office park and plaza)on the south side of Ramblin; and the fifth and final phase is the future single- family residential, also on the south side of Ramblin. In order to ensure some services are available to serve the proposed residents in this area, Staff recommends a change to the phasing plan that swaps Phases 2 and 3; an updated phasing plan should be submitted prior to the City Council hearing. Staff recommends as a development agreement provision the subject property is subdivided prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications and/or prior to issuance of any building permits to ensure future development complies with the setback standards of the district and for addressing purposes. The portion of the site south of W.Ramblin Drive,depicted in Section VII.D as a holding area for future redevelopment and as Phases 4 and 5 of the preliminary plat,shall be further subdivided prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications and/or issuance of any building permits within that area. Existing Structures/Site Improvements: There are several existing homes and accessory structures on this site that are proposed to be removed. All of the existing homes and accessory structures on the subject property should be removed prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature on the phase in which they lie Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development is required to comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Tables 11-2A-6 for the R-8 district, 11-2A-7 for the R-15 district, 11-2A-8 for the R-40 zoning district,and 11-2B-3 for the C-G district. Subdivision Design&Improvement Standards: The proposed subdivision is required to comply with the design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3,including but not limited to those for streets, alleys, driveways, easements and mailbox placement. The proposed plat appears to comply with these standards. A cross-section for the alley should be submitted with the final plat that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5.The Applicant should improve Larry Ln.(formerly a private street)to public street standards as required by ACHD. Access: There are(4) existing driveways via Chinden Blvd., a principal arterial and state highway(20- 26); (3)existing driveways via N. Black Cat Rd., an arterial street; and(2)existing driveways via W. Larry Ln., a local street. One(1)public collector street(W. Ramblin Dr.)access is proposed via N. Black Cat Rd. approximately 675' south of Chinden in alignment with W. Ramblin Ct. on the east side of Black Cat. This street will run parallel with Chinden/US 20-26 and eventually connect to N. Rustic Oak Way to the west with development of Prescott Ridge Subdivision and the school. Ramblin Dr.will function as a backage road and provide connectivity and access to all properties fronting the state highway in this area in accord with UDC 11-3H-4B.3. A traffic signal is planned at the Rustic Oak/Chinden intersection for safe access via the state highway. A temporary emergency only access is proposed via Chinden Blvd.,which is no longer needed because Ramblin will be extended to the west to Rustic Oak with the first phase of development;permanent direct access via Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 is prohibited. Staff r-eeommends the time,emer-geney neeess is r-eloented to the west boundaFy of the site in order-to eomply with the noise should be revised to r-efleet this ehange prior-to the City Couneil hearing. Stag F-eeemmends as when W. Ra4blin Dr. is exended to the west to N. Rustie Oak Dr. At thM the beFm,wa4, !a-nds,.apin-and pathway shall be extended a s this area. Permanent direct access via W. Chinden Page 13 Blvd./SH 2O-26 is prohibited.Four(4) accesses are proposed via the collector street on the north side of Ramblin and three (3)are proposed on the south side of Ramblin. The UDC (11-3A-3) requires cross-access/ingress-egress easements to be granted to adjoining properties that take direct access to an arterial and/or collector roadway when local street access isn't available,either by recorded easement or as a note on the recorded final plat.Accordingly, a cross-access/ingress-egress easement should be granted to the out-parcel(Parcel#SO428111201) at the northeast corner of this site for future access and interconnectivity. Private streets will be provided for access to the multi-family portion of the development for addressing purposes and must comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4.An alley is proposed for access to the 10 townhomes that front on Ramblin.A public street(N. Oakstone Ave.)is proposed between Larry Ln. and Ramblin Dr. for access to the future development area.North Willowside Ave. is proposed to stub to the south to the school property and provides access to the alley that serves the townhomes. Landscaping: A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 and N. Black Cat Rd.,both entryway corridors; and a 20-foot wide street buffer is required along W. Ramblin Dr.,a collector street, measured from ultimate back of curb location. Landscaping is required within the street buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C; enhanced landscape design features are required along entryway corridors—revise plan accordingly.If the unimproved right- of-way(ROW)is 10' or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, the developer is required to maintain a 10' wide compacted gravel shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative groundcover as set forth in UDC 11-3B-7C.5; revise the plan accordingly and depict the location of the edge of pavement. UDC Table 11-211-3 requires a 25' wide buffer to residential uses in the C-G district,unless otherwise modified by City Council.Landscaping is required within the buffer in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C for landscape buffers to adjoining uses. The plans depict a 25' wide buffer on the west side of the commercial uses on the north side of Ramblin adjacent to the multi-family development as required; the parking on the back side of the buffer is for the residential development.The landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the commercial property should include landscaping in accord with the aforementioned standards. Noise abatement is required for residential uses adjoining state highways consisting of a berm or a berm and wall combination parallel to the state highway in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3H-4D. The Applicant proposes a 4-foot tall berm with a concrete retaining wall on the south side of the berm and a 6-foot tall concrete modulated wall on top of the berm along Chinden Blvd. A detail should be submitted with the final plat application that includes the centerline location/elevation of Chinden Blvd.in relation to the berm and wall, and other applicable information that demonstrates compliance with the required standards. The landscape plan depicts a break in the wall midway through the multi-family development where an emergency access is proposed; breaks in the berm/wall will degrade the function and are not allowed—the emergency access should be moved to the west boundary of the site. Landscaping,including trees and bushes,is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C and should be depicted on the landscape plan submitted with the final plat application.Minimum 5-foot wide landscape strips are required to be provided along each side of the pathway; designs are encouraged in which the width of the landscape strip varies to provide additional width to plant trees farther from the pathway to prevent root damage(see UDC 11-3B-12C for more information). Page 14 There are several existing trees on the site—where possible,existing trees should be retained. Mitigation is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-10C.S; calculations demonstrating compliance with the aforementioned standards should be depicted on the landscape plan submitted with the final plat. Common Open Space& Site Amenities(UDC 11-3G-3): Because the townhome portion of the site is below 5-acres in size, common open space and site amenities are not required per UDC 11-3G-2. However,the Applicant is providing 0.28-acre(or 15.2%)usable open space for that area. Common open space&site amenities are required with the multi family portion of the development with the conditional use permit(see Section V.C below). Pathways: All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. A multi-use pathway is required along the eastern boundary of the site within the street buffer along N. Black Cat Rd. in accord with the Pathways Master Plan and along the northern boundary of the site within the street buffer along Chinden/SH 2O-26 in accord with UDC 11-3H-4C.4, as proposed. A 14- foot wide public pedestrian easement is required for each of the pathways if located outside the adjacent road right-of-way(see Park's Dept. comments in Section VIII.). Sidewalks(Il-3A-17): The UDC requires minimum 5' wide attached sidewalk along local streets (i.e. N. Willowside Ave.,N. Oakstone Ave. &Larry Ln.); and detached sidewalks along collector streets(i.e. Ramblin Dr.)—for pedestrian safety, Staff recommends 10' wide detached sidewalks are required as proposed along W. Ramblin Dr. as a provision of the development agreement. Parking: Off-street parking is required to be provided for the residential portion of the development based on the total number of bedrooms per unit as set forth in UDC Table 11-3C-6; and for the commercial uses as set forth in UDC 11-3C-6B.1.See parking analysis below in Section Cfor the multi- family portion of the development. Waterways: All open waterways, except natural waterways, should be piped or otherwise covered unless used as a water amenity or linear open space as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B,unless otherwise waived by Council. There is an existing open ditch along the eastern portion of the northern boundary of the site,which is required to piped with development along with any other open waterways,as applicable. Fencing: All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6C and I1-3A-7, as applicable. The landscape plan depicts 6' tall solid vinyl privacy fencing around portions of the perimeter of the development; 5' tall open vision iron fencing around the dog park and clubhouse/swimming pool common areas; and a concrete noise abatement wall/fence along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26. Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required in accord with UDC 11-3A-21. Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances. Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18):An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances.Design and construction shall follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18. APreliminaa Engineeringeport was submitted with this application. Building Elevations: A couple of conceptual building elevations were submitted for the proposed 2- story townhome units, included in Section VII.1 below. Building materials consist of a mix of horizontal, Page 15 vertical and shake siding with stone veneer/brick accents in neutral colors. Conceptual elevations weren't submitted for the commercial structures. The design of the residential and commercial structures is required to comply with the standards in the Architectural Standards Manual(ASM). Single-family detached structures are exempt from these standards. C. Conditional Use Permit(CUP) A CUP is requested for a multi-family development consisting of 312 apartment units on 16.70-acres of land in the R-40 zoning district as shown on the site plan included below in Section VII.E. A mix of 1- (72 units),2-(180 units)and 3-bedroom(60 units)units are proposed in 16 3-story structures. Three(3) different building floor plans are proposed, as follows: (4)Type A—containing a total of 30 units each; (4)Type B—containing a total of 24 units each; and(8)Type C—containing a total of 12 units each. Dimensional Standards: Future development is required to comply with the minimum dimensional standards of the R-40 zoning district in UDC Table 11-2A-8.Note: UDC 11-4-3-27B.1 requires residential structures to provide a minimum setback of 10'unless a greater setback is otherwise required. Phasing: The multi-family development is proposed to be constructed in two(2)phases with the first two phases of the subdivision. Access: Two (2)driveway accesses are proposed to the site via W. Ramblin Dr.,a collector street, along the southern boundary of the site. Private streets are proposed for internal access and for wayfinding/addressing purposes and should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4.Private streets are required to be a minimum 26' in width,as proposed, to meet Fire Dept.requirements for 3- story structures. Pathways: A 10' wide multi-use pathway exists within the street buffer adjacent to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 in accord with UDC 11-3H-4C.4, and is proposed along the southern boundary of the site adjacent to W. Ramblin Dr. and along the western perimeter boundary of the site. Internal 5' wide pathways are proposed throughout the site for access to perimeter walkways, internal common open space areas and residential units. Sidewalks: Six-foot wide sidewalks are proposed within the development around buildings. The UDC 11-3C-5B requires sidewalks to be widened an additional 2' from 5' to 7' where parking spaces abut sidewalks and wheel stops aren't provided to prevent overhang—in this case,the length of parking spaces may be reduced 2' from 19' to 17'.Alternatively,wheel stops may be provided in parking spaces to prevent vehicles overhanging beyond the designated parking stall dimensions. Fencing: All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. The landscape plan depicts 6' tall solid vinyl privacy fencing around portions of the perimeter of the development; 5' tall open vision iron fencing around the dog park and clubhouse/swimming pool common areas; and a concrete noise abatement wall/fence along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): Multi-family developments are subject to specific use standards as follows: (Staff's analysis/comments in italic text) 11-4-3-27: MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: `B. Site Design: 1. Residential buildings shall provide a minimum setback often feet(10')unless a greater setback is otherwise required by this title and/or title 10 of this Code. Building setbacks shall take into account windows, entrances,porches and patios,and how they impact adjacent properties. The residential structures comply with the minimum setback standard. Page 16 2. All on-site service areas, outdoor storage areas,waste storage, disposal facilities, and transformer and utility vaults shall be located in an area not visible from a public street,or shall be fully screened from view from a public street.All proposed transformer/utility vaults and other service areas shall comply with this requirement. The trash enclosures depicted on the site plan should accommodate recycling. 3. A minimum of eighty(80)square feet of private,usable open space shall be provided for each unit. This requirement can be satisfied through porches,patios,decks, and/or enclosed yards. Landscaping, entryway and other access ways shall not count toward this requirement. In circumstances where strict adherence to such standard would create inconsistency with the purpose statements of this section,the Director may consider an alternative design proposal through the alternative compliance provisions as set forth in section 11-5B-5 of this title. The Applicant proposes 82 square foot patios or balconies for each unit in accord with this standard. 4. For the purposes of this section,vehicular circulation areas,parking areas,and private usable open space shall not be considered common open space. These areas were not included in the common open space calculations for the site. 5. No recreational vehicles, snowmobiles,boats or other personal recreation vehicles shall be stored on the site unless provided for in a separate, designated and screened area. The Applicant should comply with this requirement. 6. The parking shall meet the requirements set forth in chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts",of this title. The proposed parking meets and exceeds UDC standards per the analysis below. Based on(72) 1-bedroom units, (180)2-bedroom units, and(60) 3-bedroom units, a minimum of 679 off-street parking spaces are required, including guest parking(31 spaces) and covered spaces (312). A total of 693 spaces are proposed,including 312 covered carport spaces,which exceeds the minimum standard by 14 spaces. Accessible parking is required in accord with ADA standards; 14 accessible spaces are proposed. Based on 693 vehicle parking spaces provided,a minimum of 28 bicycle parking spaces are required and should meet the location and design standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. Fifty-two (52)exterior bicycle parking spaces are proposed,which exceeds the minimum standard by 24 spaces. Three(3)bicycle parking spaces are proposed at each building and four(4) spaces are proposed inside the clubhouse. Staff recommends the parking provided at the clubhouse is exterior and meets the standards in UDC 11-3C-5C.The site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should reflect parking accordingly.Note: This parking is in addition to the covered bicycle parking proposed in the clubhouse as an amenity. 7. Developments with twenty(20)units or more shall provide the following: a. A property management office. b. A maintenance storage area. c. A central mailbox location, including provisions for parcel mail,that provide safe pedestrian and/or vehicular access. d. A directory and map of the development at an entrance or convenient location for those entering the development. (Ord. 18-1773,4-24-2018) The floor plan for the clubhouse depicts offices and a reception lounge, one of which presumably will be for the property management office,mailboxes, and a maintenance storage area. The site plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should Page 17 clearly depict the location of a directory and map of the development for wayfinding purposes. C. Common Open Space Design Requirements(UDC 11-4-3-27C): The total baseline land area of all qualified common open space shall equal or exceed ten(10) percent of the gross land area for multi-family developments of five (5)acres or more. When multi- family is approved concurrently with single-family,the minimum open space requirements in Section 11-3G-3 shall apply to the gross land area of entire development. All open space is required to meet the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27C.2&4.Based on 16.7-acres of land in the multi- family portion of the development, a minimum of 1.67-acres is required to be provided to meet this requirement. (Note:Because the single-family(i.e. townhome)portion of the development only consists of 10 units and is under 5-acres in size, Staff isn't requiring the entire residential development to meet the common open space standards in UDC 11-3G-3 for single-family developments (i.e. 15%for the R-15 zone). The Applicant is providing 0.28-acre (or 15.201o) usable open space for that area.) In addition to the baseline open space requirement, a minimum area of outdoor common open space shall be provided as follows: a. One hundred fifty(150) square feet for each unit containing five hundred(500) or less square feet of living area.None of the units are below 500 square feet(sf.). b. Two hundred fifty(250) square feet for each unit containing more than five hundred(500) square feet and up to one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area.All 312 units are between 500 and 1,200 square feet. Therefore, a minimum of 78,000 sf. (or 1.79-acres) of common open space is required to be provided. c. Three hundred fifty(350) square feet for each unit containing more than one thousand two hundred(1,200) square feet of living area.None of the units exceed 1,200 square feet. All multi-family projects over 20 units are required to provide at least one(1) common grassy area integrated into the site design allowing for general activities by all ages that is a minimum of 5,000 s.f. in area;the area shall increase proportionately as the number of units increase and shall be commensurate to the size of the development as determined by the decision-making body. Where this area cannot be increased due to site constraints,it may be included elsewhere in the development(UDC 11-4-3-27C.3). Common open space shall be not less than four hundred(400) square feet in area,and shall have a minimum length and width dimension of twenty feet(20'). The common open space areas depicted on the open space exhibit in Section VHY meet this requirement. In phased developments,common open space shall be provided in each phase of the development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units per UDC 11-4-3-27C.7.This project is proposed to develop in two phases; the Applicant should demonstrate compliance with this standard with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the first phase of the multi-family development. Unless otherwise approved through the conditional use process,common open space areas shall not be adjacent to collector or arterial street buffers unless separated from the street by a berm or constructed barrier at least four feet(4') in height,with breaks in the berm or barrier to allow for pedestrian access. The common open space proposed for the clubhouse, swimming pool and tot lot, and the dog park are all located between an internal private street and a collector street (Ramblin).As noted above in Section IV, Staff recommends these common areas are relocated internal to the development and are accessible by pathway in accord with open space and Page 18 CPTED standards for public safety and integration into the development(see UDC 11-4-3- 27C.2). Based on the above standards, a minimum total of 3.46-acres of common open space is required to be provided for the multi family development that meets the standards in UDC 11-4-3-27C.2, 4, 6, 7 and 9. The Applicant proposes a total of 3.58-acres, which meets and exceeds the minimum standard, consisting of% the street buffer along W. Chinden Blvd. (52-acre); the dog park(0.47- acre); clubhouse, swimming pool&tot lot(0.77-acre); and internal common open space and linear open space areas exceeding 20'x 20'in area (1.82-acres) as shown on the open space exhibit in Section VII.F. The tot lot, at approximately 6,900 sf., meets the requirement for a minimum 5,000 sf common grassy area. Additionally, a 20,681 sf common grassy area is also provided for a dog park, which Staff feels is commensurate with the size of the development. That being said,Staff is recommending relocation of the common open space areas with amenities as noted above,an updated open space exhibit should be submitted that demonstrates compliance with these standards. D. Site Development Amenities: All multi-family developments shall provide for quality of life, open space, and recreation amenities to meet the particular needs of the residents as noted in UDC 11-4-3-27D.1. The number of amenities shall depend on the size of the multi-family development based on the number of units. For multi-family developments with more than 100 units such as this,the decision-making body shall require additional amenities [i.e. beyond the four(4)required for developments with 75 units or more] commensurate to the size of the proposed development,with at least one (1) from each category(i.e. quality of life, open space,recreation,multi-modal). The following amenities are proposed from each of the following categories: 1)Quality of Life— clubhouse,which includes a fitness facility and dog wash station, and a dog park with waste station; Open Space—(4) community garden areas,plazas and a(5)picnic areas, including tables,benches, landscaping and a shade structure; Recreation—swimming pool, children's play structure/tot lot, walking trails/pathways; and Multi-modal—bicycle repair station and enclosed bicycle storage in the clubhouse. Staff is of the opinion the proposed amenities meet and exceed the standards. See amenity exhibit in Section VII.F. E. Landscaping Requirements: Development shall meet the minimum landscaping requirements in accord with chapter 3, "Regulations Applying to All Districts",of this title. Additionally, all street facing elevations shall have landscaping along their foundation that complies with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27E.2,which requires a landscape area at least 3-feet wide planted with one evergreen shrub every three(3)linear feet that has a mature height of 24-inches with ground cover plants in the remainder of the landscaped area. The landscape plan submitted with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application should be revised to include evergreen shrubs in accord with this standard. Landscaping is required to be provided along all pathways per the standards listed in UDC 11- 3B-12C,which require a mix of trees,shrubs,lawn,and/or other vegetative groundcover within 5-foot wide strips on each side of the pathway; the landscape plan should be revised accordingly. Street buffer landscaping is required with development of the subdivision in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-313-7C, as noted above in Section V.B. F. Maintenance and Ownership Responsibilities: All multi-family developments shall record legally binding documents that state the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development,including,but not limited to, structures,parking,common Page 19 areas,and other development features." The Applicant shall comply with this requirement,a copy of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy within the development. G. Police access under exigent circumstances. Multifamily developments with units that take access via secured common corridors shall install and maintain a keyless entry system, or suitable alternative,to provide police access to the common corridors under exigent circumstances. The keyless entry system or alternative shall be subject to review and approval by the Meridian Police Department. The Applicant should coordinate with the Police Dept. to ensure compliance with this standard. Building Elevations(UDC 11-3A-19 I Architectural Standards Manual): Conceptual elevations and renderings were submitted for the proposed multi-family structures, included in Section VILG below. The final design of all structures is required to comply with the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and will be reviewed for compliance with these standards with the Design Review application. Compliance with the building code requirements for separation between structures within the development is required. VI. DECISION A. Staff: Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation with the requirement of a Development Agreement,preliminary plat, and conditional use permit with the recommendations noted above in Sections IV and V,with the conditions in Section IX in accord with the Findings in Section X. B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on July 18, 2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend denial of the subject AZ,PP and CUP requests. 1. Summary of Commission public hearing a. In favor: David Bailey,Bailey Engineering b. In opposition: Wade Ramsey,Bainbridge Subdivision HOA President; Matt Neukom: Mark Blocovich;Kirsten Chidester; Don Brown; Greg Taylor c. Commenting None d. Written testimony: Matt&Ashley Neukom and John Bartlett III&Vickie Bartlett; Brooke Neilson; Wade Ramsey,Bainbridge Subdivision HOA President; Stephanie Labastida e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application: None 2. Ke. ids)of public testimony a. Opposed to the project based on the development requirements in the CC&R's for Compton Sub.No. 2,which require minimum 1-acre lot sizes within the subdivision among other things; b. Opposed to the proposed multi-family development due to over-capacity of area schools and traffic flow in this area not able to accommodate so much housing; C. Concern pertaining to traffic cut-through through Bainbridge Sub.to the commercial uses to the east on Ten Mile Rd.; southbound traffic on Black Cat Rd. &con esg tion during peak hours—request for a traffic signal or a roundabout to alleviate congestion; concern pertaining to safety of children traveling to the nearby elementary school with construction of sidewalks on this property but no sidewalk along Black Cat Rd. for approximately 500' in between the subject property and the school. The Bainbridge HOA Board,representing its homeowners, opposes this project until infrastructure improvements are made to accommodate the proposed development. Page 20 d. Opposed to the development due to the negative impacts on the quality of life of residents in the Trilogy Sub. (to the east)due to increased traffic volumes and speeds and associated safety hazards for children who live in the area,noise, congestion and increased activity in the area. Preference for this area to develop with solely residential uses rather than mixed-use with commercial and desire for commercial uses to be provided further to the west. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Opinion that existing infrastructure(i.e. roads and schools)can't accommodate the proposed development-Black Cat Rd. won't be widened until 2036-2040 and the Black Cat/McMillan roundabout isn't scheduled until 2028. a. Relocation of the common open space located along Ramblin Dr. where the dog park, clubhouse&swimming pool, and tot lot is located to a more central integrated location within the multi-family development as recommended by Staff. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. The Commission recommended denial of the project due to the proposed density putting too much burden on current infrastructure and the site plan not supporting centrally located and integrated common open space within the multi-family portion of the development. 5. Outstanding issue(s) for City Council: a. See items highli htg ed in yellow at the beginning of Section VIII requested by Staff that have not been addressed that the Applicant requests to remain as-is. Page 21 VII. EXHIBITS A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map—NOT APPROVED Description for Annexation Slayden Subdivision May 17, 2024 A portion of the North 1 J2 of the Northeast 114 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 21, 22,27 and 28, TAN., R.1W,, B.M.,from which the 114 comer common to said Sections 27 and 28, bears South 00°29'U4"West, 2638.58 feet;thence on the east boundary line cf said Section 28, South 00°29'04"West, 380.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing South 00'29'04"West, 959.32 feet to the centerline of W. Larry Lane; thence on said centerline, North 89°23'38''West,693.17 feet to the southerly extension of Lot 3. Block 1, Comptons Subdivision No. 2 as filed in Book 31 of Plats at Pages 1935 and 1936, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence North 00029'02"East, 548.13 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence on the north boundary line of said Comptons Subdivision No. 2, North 89°17'56"West.415.79 feet to the Northwest comer of said Comptons Subdivision No. 2 coincident with the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 1, Luhr Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5766 and 5767, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on the exterior boundary line of said Luhr Subdivision the following two (2)courses and distances: North 00"36'01"East, 110.38 feet; North 89923'46"West, 828.63 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1 of said Luhr Subdivision; thence on the west boundary fine of said Lot 3, North 00°41'50"East, 328.66 Meet; thence leaving said west boundary line, South 89'18'10"East, 16.00 feet; thence North 00°39'27"East,330.47 feet to the north boundary line of said Section 28; R��Ati tANp�' thence on said north boundary line the following `� Z NSI� two(2)courses and distances: *I-% Or 0 rL South 89°24'50"East,el1.75 feet to the �1 Jf7V East 1116 corner common to said Sections Cl , 21 and 28; O� of 1¢ 100 Y M cC A ' Page 1 of 2 Page 22 South 59'25'49" East, 680.40 feet to the northerly extension of the east boundary line of said Luhr Subdivision; thence on Said east boundary line and the northerly extension thereof, South 00°33'05"West, 360,00 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, South 89`25'50" Last, 627,43 Feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Containing 38.584 acres, more or less. End of Description, N N 11779 � r of % o Page 2 of 2 Page 23 W. Chinden Mvd. 1f16 S.21 1 f4 695,33 E' S89'2d'54'E S89'25'49"E 5.21 S_28 w 611.75 680,#0' 627.41' S.28J��S,22 , S-27 y O unpLatled 4 k Z ] � Point of SB9'25'50T Beginning S89'18'10'! 627.43" p � t38.5$d F1,GFE9 • O - Z — —— N89'23'46"W 62B.63- N44'36'01"E un v} 110,38' N89'17'55"W M ao v+ 415.79' �2 as r7'i q X Fz} 6 4V.11 w v �t 4 Gomptons Q m C) [n Subdivisiarr, N unpdatted Na, 2 O Go z W. Larry Ln. Le) N89'23'38"W 893.17-7 '• I ' J I • CazrapEarss n i Subdivistinzx ")� Ara_ 2 Q° M_ kl L A,y I NZ Z\GlENB_ &P 1/4 HiD �Od} r6-aF 4f McCA�' I Scale- 0 175 350 700 P S.ih iT•s.gy—Chi,tl 21 A—) 1a SS 51 Pu Idf4H Exhibit Drawing for Jo so 9@55N.ELIEaainsi. Annexation Sheet No. SURVEY (209) &015?0 �ne Blayden Subdivision 1[296J&1ID8 Uea GROUP LLC A portion of the N1/2 of the NE1 4 of Sectlon 28, Dwg. Dote T_461., R,IW,. 6.N., Ado County, Idaho. 5/17/202d Page 24 Description for R-8 Zone Blayden Subdivision May 21, 2024 A portion of the Northeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 21, 22, 27 and 28, TAN., R_IVV., 8_ltill., from which the 114 corner common to said Sections 27 and 28, bears South 00'29'04"West, 2538.68 feet; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 28, South 00029'04"West, 1.078.23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 00'29'04"West, 241.09 feet to the centerline of W. Larry Lane; thence on said centerline. North 89'23'38"West,893.17 feet to the southerly extension of Lot 3, Block 1, Comptons Subdivision No. 2 as filed in Book 31 of Plats at Pages 1935 and 1936, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence North 40029'02" East, 548.13 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence on the north boundary line of said Comptons Subdivision No. 2, South 89"17'56" East. 155.43 feet; thence leaving said north boundary line. South 00'42'04"West, 206.42 feet; thence 60-16 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 76_50 feet, a central angle of 45402'51", and a long chard which bears South 21'49'22"East, 58.61 feet: thence South 44'20'47" East, 70.34 feet; thence 60.27 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 76.66 feet, a Central angle of 45A02'51", and a long chord which bears South 66'52'13"East, 58.73 feet; thence South 89'23'38" East, 223.44 feet; thence North 69'59'37"East, 9.15 feet; thence 76.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 55.D0 feet, a central angle of 79811 1'24", and a long chard which gears North 88'58'34" East, 70.11 feet; thence North 38'34'16"East, 25.63 feet: theflce South 89'31'22" East,294.58 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. tANo Containing 5.901 acres, more or less. t End of Description. }� Page ] of 1 Page 25 E 1/16 - - - N89'25'49'W 1307.40' _ S.21 S.22 W. Chinden Blvd. S.28 S.27 <N� Scale: 1"=200' I I 0 50 t00 200 400 ; i I Line Table { ' 8 Line Bearing Length y, Lt 544'20'47'E 70.34' I � I L2 NSS*59'37"E 9,15' Unplatted r N L3 N38'34'16"E 25.63' °�° I w p1 155.43' ,i v 58917'555'E _ ° m � 00 �a fV 1 ❑ CV Q m C� ❑ V) 3 N (� 294.58' j Paint of 0 223.44' 03 S89`31'22"E Beginning N 02 S89'23'38"E L3 t5.901 Acres 0 W. Larry Ln. N89'23'38"W 893.17' ram • F I Nj jk16 LA�y g y�C Nat Curve Tuble fi f � Curve Length Radius delta Chard Bearing Chord Length ¢ 11779 C1 60.15' 76.50' 45'02'51' S21'49'22"E 58.61' 5.27 C1 ZaZ ?,0 C2 60.27' 76.56' 45'02'51" S66'52'1ST S8.73' OF McCA ' ` C3 76.02' 55M' 79'11'24" N88'58'34"E 70.11' F':Ipia3da^5nb(T'i',y-ahs4n 27 As )2C- E,d-a 5/211202, ':0+:25--A IQH� Exhibit Drawing for Job No. SURVEY 9MSRWIDAHOMMBT R—S Zone 20203 ao�e,iparn earns Shert No. sue,viaesan Blayden Subdivision 1 GROUP LLC A portion of the NEt/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 2B. Dwg• Data T.4N., R.1W_, B-M., Ado County, Idphp_ 5/21/2024 Page 26 Description for R-15 Zane Blayden Subdivision May 17, 2024 A portion of the Northeast 1l4 of the Northeast 1f4 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 Vilest, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 21, 22, 27 and 28, T.4N., R.1W., B.M., from which the 114 corner common to said Sections 27 and 28, bears South 00"29'04"West, 2638.68 feet, thence on the east boundary line of said Section 28, South 00°29'04"West, 772.67 feet to the Northeast corner of Comptons Subdivision No. 2 as filed in Book 31 of Plats at Pages 1935 and 1936, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on the north boundary line of said Comptons Subdivision No- 2, North 89'1756"West, 737-75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 89`17'56"Vilest, 571.21 feet to the Northwest corner of said Comptons Subdivision No. 2 coincident with the Southwest comer of Lot 5, Block 1, Luhr Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5766 and 5767, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on the exterior boundary line of said Luhr Subdivision, North 00°35'01" East, 85.38 feet; thence leaving said exterior boundary line, South 89°2346" East, 0.22 feet; thence 73.36 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 180.00 feet, a central angle of 23°21'04", and a long chord which bears North 78°55'42" East, 72-85 feet; thence North 67"15'10" East, 100.26 feet; thence 73.66 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 180.DO feet, a central angle of 23°25'54", and a long chord which bears North 78958'37" East, 73.15 feet; thence South 89'17'56" East, 297.72 feet; thence South 44°40'34" East, 54.10 feet; thence South 00'42'D4" Vilest, 117.00 feet tc the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1-828 acres, more or less- � 1-44 cn End of description. 11 on 12 �0 °p OF MOCK Page 1 of 1 Page 27 W.-Chirnden Blvd. - S.21 S.22 E 1/16 N89'25'49"W 1307.40 -- - -- - 5.2$ -S.27 I I I +I I 1 1 1 LUAT I Subdivision Unpa ad led m I ry h co 06 f I I ff) S -13 L 1 I IY C U1 1 r-i y m C2 5591 TWE 297.72' 0 m J L2 t1.828 Acres 1 0 d N89'17'56"W 571.21' Point of N89'17'56"W 737.75' Beginning Compton Subdivision No. 2 0 Im I� 1 Line Table Line Bearing Length L1 NOU3 1�46'01'E 85.38' 1/4 IS. 27 L2 589'23'45"E 0.22' L3 N67'15'10'E 100.26' L4 S44'40'34'E 54.10' N$ L5 S00'42'04"W 117.00' 11779 ;a Curve fable AfcCAl� Curve Length Radius Delta Chard Bearing Chord Length C1 73.36' 180.DD' 23'21'04" N7855'42"E 72,85' C2 73.66' 180.DD' 23.28'54" N78'58'37"E 73.15' Scale: 1"=20C' 0 5D 1017 200 400 P:Rio .5uh I.i. tti-a.n 77 F«. xo-so7ti �Knni.lrt-i ia. SIfl�osa i. s.oe w, IDAH Exhibit Drawing far Job No. �EMER R-15 ZO7B 20-203 SURVEY UQWF. RAHO9 " Sheet No[xoeb84"SM Blayden Subdivision 1 GROUP, LLC A portion of ttie NE1/+ of the NE1/4 of Sectlon 2B, uwg. dote T,4N., R,1W., B.M., Ada County, Idaho. 5/17J2424 Page 28 Description for R-40 Zone Blayden Subdivision June 18,2023 A portion of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 114 of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Section corner common to Sections 21, 22, 27 and 28, T.4N., R,1 W., B.M., frorn which the 1/4 corner common to said Sections 27 and 28, bears South 00°29'04" West, 2638.68 feet; thence on the north boundlafy line of said Section 28, North 89°25'49" West, 806.15 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving said north boundary line, South 00'39'27"West, 526.67 feet; thence South 89°17'56" Last, 24.10 feet; thence South 10'4-3'12" East, 41.97 feet; thence South 00°42'04"West, 48.00 feet; thence North 89'17'56"West, 297.72 feet; thence 73.66 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 190.00 feet, a central angle of 23"26'54", and a long chord which bears South 78'58'37" West, 73.15 feet; thence South 67'15'10'West, 100,26 feet; thence 73,36 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 180.00 feet, a central angle of 23°21'04", and a long chord which bears South 78°55'42"West, 72.85 feet; thence North 89423'44" West, 0.22 feet to the exterior boundary line of Luhr Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5766 and 5767, records of Ada County, Idaho; thence on said exterior boundary line the following two (2) courses and distances; North 00°36'01" East, 25.00 feet; L LAIvo ENS rw �, 117 Ln fig F \9 per' Page 29 North 69"23'46"Vest, 628.63 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1 of said Luhr Subdivision; thence on the west boundary line said of Lot 3, North 00°41'50" East, 328.66 feet; thence leaving said west boundary line, South 89'1V0" East, t6.00 feat; thence North 00'39'27" East, 330,47 feet to the north boundary line of said Section 28; thence on said north boundary line the following two (2) courses and distances: South 89'24'50" East, 611.75 feet to the East 1/16 corner common to said SeCtions 21 and 28; South 89°25'49' East, 501.26 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Contsining 16.710 acres, more or less. End of Description. �NcaNa 704, OF l Af MrCA ` Page 2 of 2 Page 30 W. 0hinden Blvd- 3.21 1/4 589'24'54"E 871.75' 589'25'49"E 501,26' N 8925'_49_"w_ s.21 S.22 S,2S 695.33' E in#1/16 806,15 S.25 5-27 w Pa of B®ginning i ;: o CjLO i 2 • iti .a tZ6.714 54 L6 Acres I CKj m w fjf f" Li o y o It O Ln N69'23'48'W 628,63' N89'17'56°W G2 567"15'14 W 297.72' L4 100.26' I Comp Lens I UnpLosttea Subdivision Na 2 I � Line Table Lie Bearing Length 1/4 L1 589'17'5S'E 24.10' S,28 S.27 L2 S10'43'12'E 41.97' L3 SO0'42'04"W 413.40' L4 N69'23'46'W 0.22' 1 PL LA4Vq L5 NU0-:55'01"E 25_00' FINS � L6 58918'1O'E 16.00' p 11779 Curve Table Curve Length Radius Delta Chord Bearing Chard Length { �dcCR�A C1 73.615' 150,00' 2326'54» S78'58'37'W 73.15' C2 73.36' 180,00' 23'21'04" S78'55'42"w 72,85' Scale: D 125 250 50C `.uM1;T—qy-C—27 lucrr' .'{1-2G3 tlxy'yI.—',fi +C tl bflty/M.1 114 M11 1`Y IDAHO Exhibit Qyro7wing for �203 SURVEY BOSE. FMFr?AMU104H681, R— 4J Zone eOE IDAFIO8LDS Sheet Nn_ 13618S5 ewE Blayden SubdIVision GROUP, LLC A portion of iha N1/2 of the NE1/4 of Section 28, ❑wg. Dote TAN, RJ YV., B.M.. Ada County, ldoha- 6/18/2023 Page 31 Description for C-G Zone Blayden Subdivision May 21. 2024 A portion of the Northeast 114 of the Northeast 114 of Section 25, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: Ccmmencing at the Section corner common to Sections 21, 22, 27 and 28, T.4N., R.1 ., B.M., from which the 1l4 comer common to said Sections 27 and 28, bears South 00`29'04"West, 2638.68 feet; thence on the east boundary line of said Section 28, South 00°29'04"West, 360.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 00°29'04" West, 718.23 feet; thence leaving said east boundary line, North 89°31'22"Vilest, 224.58 feet; thence South 38°34'16" West, 25.63 feet; thence 76.02 feet on the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 55.00 feet, a central angle of 7W1124", and a long chord which bears South 88°58'34"West, 70.11 feet; thence South 69°59'37" West, 9.15 feet; thence North 89'23'38"West, 223.44 feet; thence 60.27 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 76.66 feet, a central angle of 45°02'51", and a iong chord which bears North 66'52'13"West, 58.73 feet; thence North 44°20'47"West, 70.34 feet; thence 60.15 feet on the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 76.50 feet, a central angle of 45'02'51", and a long chord which bears North 21°49'22"West, 58.61 feet; thence North 00°42'04"East, 323.42 feet: thence North 44°40'34"West, 54_10 feet; thence North 00'42'04" East, 48.00 feet; 4 01 LANp c�\ 1OF-Ns thence North 10'43'12" West, 41.97 feet; thence North 89'17'56" West, 24.10 feet; 779 ar & .� thence North 00°39'27" East, 526.87 feet to the north boundary line of said Section 28; ', IcGAt Page 1 of 2 Page 32 thence on said north boundary fine, South 89425'49" East, 179.14 feet to the northerly extension of the east boundary Cane of Luhr Subdivision as filed in Book 59 of Plats at Pages 5766 and 5767, records of Ada County, Idaho: thence on said east boundary line and the northerly extension thereof. South 00'33'05"West, 360.00 feet: thence leaving said east boundary line. South 89°25'50" East, 627.43 feet to the POINT Of BEGINNING. Containing 14.145 acres, more or less. End of description, ,• l}"L 2- 11779 sl�t ° cop O P } Q, Page 2 cal 3 Page 33 E 1f16 N8925'49"W 589'25'49'E N89'25'49"W 627.01' S.21 5.22 501.26' 179.14' -- - -- - S 28 S.27 w_ Chinden Blvd. p I • KT Scale; 1"=2Q0' m � o 0 50 100 200 400 o Ur�,vtatted w 'Kry . sv Ln I . °h Point of Line Table o S139'25'50"E 627.43' Beginning o Line Bearing Length z 4 L1 S38'34'16"W 25.63' L2 S59'59'37"W 9.15' L3 N44'20'47'W 7024' m bn L4 N44'40'34"W 54.10' 0 r 00 rn rq L5 hf00'42'04"E 48,00' !p 'L CA a Lfi N10'43'12"W 41.97' ±14.145 Acres N to LL 7 NS9'17'56"1N 24.1fl` _ __, a v m o a ° O O 2 at&ns �'vk lion No 2 {� C1 u N88' 1'22"W C2 N89'23'35"W L2 294.56' 223,44' ci rr . I • W. Larry Ln_ del LA 1/4 g 1.� N8 Curve Table S.28 S.27 g4 Curve Length Radius pelts Chard Fearing Chord Length eL 11779 C1 76.02' 55.00' 79'11'24" 588'58'34"W 70.11' rZ � C2 60.27' 76.66' 45'02'51" N66'52'13"W 58.73' 0 of 14 $ Ma C3 60.15' 76.50' 45'02'51" N21'49'22"W 58.61' u.\BGrd1.6-.6(r.I.Jr Chmdo 27 Apr 2U-2W\A,\E IL.\C-c.d.g 5M/7a24 12:52:10 Fy II DApH�fQ �/ Exhibit Drawing for 206 203 SURVEY �"wE `oST. C—G Zone Sheet No. eO1)'1O"7cl Blayden Subdivision 1 ao61 B�6-�70 GROUP, LLC A portlon of the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 28. Owg. Date T4N.. RAW, E.M„ Ada County. Idoho. 5/21/2024 Page 34 B. Preliminary Plat&Phasing Plan(dated: 5/29/24) �NI '1N3 Wd013A3❑ A0C)-I INA � of P101e-V W . p NpISl/� O»nS 3 CI w -au�'9uUeeu�u3 Fa�I3 Z-.-Lp--j �3.1--- x , ji e_ I k. I x� re! 0 j ------•---------- — I i i I .,T i IP �k Nil �y S ' I , - - - F � Page 35 -__ - �_ �NI '1N3Wd0131\3❑ .100712j1 PGI'�srr'WI 9�W 8 r NI O 1 T.1 n I O 8 n S "3 a-.H,0 6 -auf'BuUeeu�u3 Fofl� - e I� r. I Y i iiiii. =1 l'11' Ilwillll� pr' � •- 1111 I1ry I't.I IIII IIII f �.� __ f;y •I:r111 t-I.Tl I rIi i Iiii i_i'I IIIIIIIhlI'-', +I:S 11! , i I � I I I ' v � I � s Y i Page 36 :-)N I a--L r-,j 914 A 0—1:3 A:9 Cl A 0 0-11 2L: QW01--4 1�4 I I C:l 8 r--j —1 ES P-4:3 C3_4L,N�r (d M, VN I--I:a�j =j 4 1- I FFF............ .. ............ -17 —F- �TM 9 jF-] r14 .................. zz .................... ri ............... 1z 1j Li Li ............ ......... cn 01 :1 �L CL j2 IN IN I Elf ........... ... . ........... "Up Il ;;i;iiiiiiid NIN Page 37 30 % .� 3 Z wo, \\nj^ w�\-k\-lj ����m . J f . , ; s„r** »V-1 ww«w.n 1-1:3ad x \ � • - d)@ [\)� . * -�J- z (IV V! - - _ • - . - ? { � \} . ~ � ` E• ° . � ) ! ` 6/ Gbba§2299gHk©gG2y2Ge» , j§Mill - y§ j/§�. » - - 2 9ngnur � gUaBHna . aan ° HHHHHHn, . J�Q; p���ecewaaw � � e�xesezew�u \ Tj \ , Page 38 Revised Phasin Plan: lan: Z>NI `1 hi3Wdb13 n3a s.�o11a1 I a 3B M ni 3 o h v l a �ul')uUaaul9u3 hall •�. - Pei ;Irirf7Tl! �_— w n 11 �'i ��I�I�I�I�I•I �Wlili li -1 !I I F..-..... _:� -ail l:I h.i :SlHlllil 'I•I'��I}' -_ -- _----- I.I'I'I�I�� IGTLII: 111�4�I LI•I'I•I�}� '' 'li{ I I 9 I . Page 39 I R`" Nam:' y •L �'p •, R1 i Al fe � }tp NOW .111 ti �� '�:a Sal ,.. •.��� ,,,� �_ NPA M WPM irr a, VNIII wlIN . 1 A�■ r yy °1■.I. � I �6 ■E: i � ''b�' u "'dl:. ;. .��1�{��h-#1■"jam• � _1 Gf 1 gRR■ASIR mom Jim a Iwo==Y �r ■ ------------ 177 7MWOMMID Fr- + �s I s - Y _ �L4- i� ............�. _ -� i. s------------------- z CL a w �i .._ :. VIIN ; r� z a �'_ •i' .�• w LV `' I{i ❑ �i� Sty W g � Page 41 r(](]Vo U-N IN NTldI UN IN 33NF3N3,I N'J - E3 ^� •au0ula8aulNu3 Ra11ut- 222_ '<}IJF� �u a331�a Nv']d 3dVO50NVI IV1d ANVNIINI-13Nd ipl Ins,, CL FI g .1- F; } W z-1 3NIH01M j Y I 14, iu I MA 1 , [I fr _ •I "r�.+-`.�key any�. i I�3-' �' ' r�.sx.T—.. ��Wyy x.. w ��� - _�{.�• -- ... ...... :l;: - Y SVi'.Vi tip. . ¢ r.:'+�:�5 e I +. I lI Y'ti i 71 , TZI ------------- LU Ml ,g R� - _ - II � 'fit D Page 42 Sa�J 141�A1'Idl4����uf� _ =-.- 'aq quuaauPu3 tO CIP mail Ji ------------------------ lu _ !I L : I ............................... s el ' r ........... r �; Y/Aw.;Arof" _ iawt Page 43 SUQ{�141�RYId14Rf��IM374� _ - ,\ - l �� � •1 - •'—• ,:Doi quuaaUP93 0 17- ���11 III'. K } -r -- P F.Y.. � ar17lP�Gh3.l4Y}f ytivr+Y�Y.54t�h:ilf� oi lu }• r y I J -+-C - 1� o� r =_ •_-- _ I I I` IIF I I I I r 74. -- �O ku ILI u Page 44 -^-IV I '1hl3d�13ft3❑ Jw�071 JL 11juuaauPu3 121MY-a — NV d 3C!VOSGNV1 J_V18 Aa=..,•, a dyi llJ IL r -41 W. i� 4 � Fiki ■ Y � � � __ t J S7 s Y F y•- - =_ �- ___ y E LLI fL K r Page 45 D. Conceptual Development Plan for Holding Area—Revised - — _.�.�_ '3N1 '1N3 Wd013h3fl J.6011k�1 pnl.�ylr�wq�q 1 NQIS I/�Iq�rl$ N3fl.4V79 '�I'9upd6u�13II NYId 1N3 YIdOl3h30 ld 33N07 731dtl `3HIQl0F{ ai y� y_ o hi __i- ___ •1;�. .���.°.�,'3'.�.:ai�}. a3:9xr��k•�rx�A;,4 '�_+ ;. � •�'•'x- s�°-: f a n i • I ` I i I & RCISNVO t , i I i I Page 46 E. Site Plan—Conditional Use Permit(dated: ''�"�4 9/20/24)—REVISED - �NI '1N3 Wd013/13q AD Q71�11 Gad��dl�9�q �I'1wl�or109 � C 7 NV7A 311S 11W43d 2sn -MOIlI0N0� cr OhIII ^ i P. I ,I 44 h� ��� III 1�I`--•' f i ----- l; I L � �I � � � I.•lo.a0 MC 8, '_l • ; ''� �., °h' d969A $33YR�9 itI 35 Y • 77 � Y +� � ,a.. .T�r . I i'd�x�li=� ilu .III1 F iii.1.1 � 3�A§fig§ i re aiH �}��Ee ESE° �e�l �9e L _ j 3a9�Eddej�9��a�1 -ITT IF 9;1j,444 ' �' •.•_ ----y -Ir'�ii '��r� I � �� ������I� 9I $� � ��oi?i�i� aioY���� �Edl I � Page 47 F. Open Space Plan(dated: 7/15/2023) & Site Amenities for Multi-family/Apartments _�...,_. ,a,..a �NI '1N3Wd0131�3❑ A'.�O71iJ1 p Qp�lerwwylam pg rq . tl Np IS.I I CI El nS N3O-k b'10 I mr�r�rare x -- -- --- ;I II III-I T FT 1111111 IF - It j � a �i=: .. •iii; kSi ptl'!� ���sS �� E�F � � � C, ii g3 g3 ............ ° ....iii iii..i......... _ I..... ....:-T�rITIT _ .. ..LEE I -- 4�r iii I I� iii I ��u�u 'r�lllrlill •.+= i i ,iii Page 48 kc z_ § § lei 6 66 B § / g @ \ /j L \j > § & <LU -- � 6 EE ■ \\ \_\ [§ � < �� `� - zz 7 < < k �3Eo� cam '§) \( � § § ( %) (du §\ ()§ §§ (] 2) ()/ ) I � ||| � I — � - ƒ . a . . \ /]D . �t _ _ 4" ril - , � � ] LU > C) LU . LU — �! § .IIII I ll LLIMI | 0) ---------- ---------- Page 49 Garden&Plaza Areas Pool Overview ^I �,'• W,.. Illilllllllllllllllllllll South Entry at Clubhouse: Page 50 AMENITY PRECEDENTS/CLUBHOUSE IST€t u F AMENITY PRECEDENTS/WALKING TRAILS I �d P� F' ql�e AMENITY PRECEDENTS/COMMUNITY GARDENS i ill r� ._,., :. 40 'r -441 ' Page 51 AMENITY PRECEDENTS/PICNIC AREAS o' AMENITY PRECEDENTS/DOG PARK nII�IIIIlEl7IIII II�IIIIII I � � 1 SMRI�n... � DOGS AMENITY PRECEDENTS/PLAZA _ r Page 52 G. Conceptual Perspectives from Chinden&Building Elevations/Materials for Multi-family/Apartments& Clubhouse PERSPECTIVE LOCATIONS/ SITE MAP VIEW LINES NEIGHBORS EASTBOUND WESTBOUND FFT Ull I I I I I I I f I f4 .11111j.111 11111a111 f 1 L TfTfTTf171 1 1 1 ITI I I I I I®! - I F ':'�I'I''Illlllllll� — vnex 4 8 yaw s �m.a R R �vrt[a 0 I IYI I I I ITLI f 1TT 4 11 f T4, 111IIIT I E—, I ITU I COLE/-\RCH I TECTS CBH-BLAYDEN I CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES Page 53 CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/EASTBOUND ON CHINDEN }{�a CCLE/ F;CF I-LC i ceH euroE�v i corxFVT vFasaFcrnEs CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/WESTBOUND ON CHINDEN .i 4 _a COLL C&-fJLA bra Cp+CFPT PFAWFCT'/E5 CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/VIEW LOOKING SOUTH FROM NEIGHBORS ACROSS CHINDEN T1 r - — A05AV" I C0LE/4k(,Hl7b; caN-awmFn cp.cFm�nspperrvss Page 54 u LIIIIIIIIIn� � � ll � � n � EE �T1IIIITIII IIIITII Al` - ---------------------------------------------- ILL I d fi S } ME o F T FFFFl = IIJ1i'��LW_LLLJ<JT = m 41 LLI Ln o LIIIIIIIIII { r x a w I a _ _ LJL�IIIllllllllllll�[ I1J1JIf JLHIIIJlllll LL D Page 55 ELEVATIONS/CLUBHOUSE OWNER mnrERlu M.QHINL rueAUL [mas NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS/ 1 Z-PLEX-SCHEME 01 MEN k' 'ir &4�E 410.1E NAL PAN EL-iLi RDOPAIG R4fTAL WMlOY51 MATERIAL MATERIAL ❑[] s NORTH ELEVATION) WEST ELEVATION i so to ■ II d i IN ■ SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION Page 56 ELEVATIONS/ 12-PLEX-SCHEME 02 13PPfR BASE MATE MAL .1ILS R::.::: ROOEI4C WIH DEWS MMfPoAl MATfR- WORS eu x1199; LEYEI cy I ir■ 1 1 ■ 11 ■ 0� � ���,ms I I I 1 1 11 - 1I Q NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION I�� „ „ ■ S I ■A ■ IN11 ■ 1 � �10 II ■ 14 - : SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS/24-PLEX-SCHEME 03 molimm k NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION II II ■ ■ II ■ II ■ II II IN IN II ■ ■ II MIN SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION Page 57 ELEVATIONS/24-PLEX-SCHEME 04 NONE k. I i4 o,ti NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 11 on IN IN I I IN IN IN IN IN IN IN IN SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS/30-PLEX SCHEME 03 as asWe_ti II ' 9AS1liUI 1 RW&SYUILS iM14i�t LFl¢of s ROOTING meinL w- NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION IN IN ■ it IN IN IN ■ �� EAST ELEVATION Page 58 ELEVATIONS/34-PLEX-SCHEME 04 Qo. xM, 1WPEA 9ASEMNEP111 RWELLRAILS Fn:�cS MlTH3RL MA�61NL , , , , II „wS vl i I no S w °,°HL NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION oil WEST ELEVATION IN IN IN IN IN ■ �Y 0 II I : I I " I IN IN IN IN IN IN EAST ELEVATION Link to buildinz floor plans and other drawings Page 59 H. Off-street Parking Exhibit 2 § \ � j} )�k 7 § § \ " § §§ e§N §2MID ° » /- § # \§ �� §§§ §( %§ § 2 §k \ ��Ln E\ 3 2# �/�§§ (� #. •� ka <� § m ��• f� j� �HIE })§� �� cc�§ *% ( )B §� �� \)k�z k !§ !e6§! §�) @\ 0 §) § zi �■ `2 `2` ��a !§ )© 2; K § ¢ . %b« =- , (a - � \ I : � � . , . . EME&Fu - ..,| F7A ; . � D| A� ' \ |;21 ;;h 9 � , � . 2 . . � ���� 71 � 7 . � ❑ � ;��| 2 . � � ,� � � D � � 2 L-ZZZ2=-.===:m7m R:Z �� �ƒ ! --I /% IlIIl II ,II , i �¥ Page 60 I. Conceptual Building Elevations for Townhomes t � A. y A - Page 61 J. Commercial Plaza Areas Biayden Commercial Plazas Overview The plazas and open spa ces with in the commercial portions of the development are envisioned as dynamic,Comm-unity centered areas that faster social irAeraction and enhance the urban experience.Designed as hubs of activity,these spaces are seamlessly integrated with the commercial environment to create vibrant areas where people naturally congregate,relax,and engage in a variety of experiences_ Design Features Each plaza is anchored by landscape and functional elements that not only enhance the aesthetic appeal but also contributetothefunctionaIity-of tho-e space_-Benches and picnic tahles p r-civide am pie seating far vis ito rs.The main pl a za fe atu res pe rgo la a long the pathway welcoming visitors to the space and providing coverage from the elements_ The landscaping uses a combination of plants,trees, and perennial flowers to create year-round visual interest,while shaded areas with mature trees provide relief from the sun during warmer months. lr� � ■ 1 � 1■ Integration with Commer-cial Areas The plazas are directly connected to the surrounding commercial spates,serving as natural extensions of the retail areas.Wide,accessilale pathways lead direrdy from storefronts into the open spaces,encouraging foot traffic and making the plazas a central gathering point_The Page 62 glayden Commercial Plazas proximity of these areas to the coffee shop and offices spaces ensures a constant flow of people,fostering a lively atmosphere throughout the day. The open spaces are designed to be highly visible from key commercial entrances and pedestrian thoroughfares,inviting visitors to stop, tinge,and expiore-Clear sightlines from the main streets erasure that the plazas are easily identifiable as centers of activity,attfauting both local residents and visitors- t{1 lu Fr-7 r ,w Activation and Usage These plazas are designed for everyday use, making them highly flexible and adaptable" Comfortable seating areas,small grassy lawns,and shaded corners are also perfect for informal gatherings orquiet moments,offering balance between active and passive uses-The plazas' human-scale design encourages spontaneous interaction,with seating arranged in ways that promote conversation, peo p le-watch i n&or casual dining" Page 63 VIII. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS The Commission recommended denial of this application to City Council due to the proposed density putting too much burden on current infrastructure and the site plan not supporting centrally located and integrated common open space within the multi-family portion of the development. Staff has left he following comments and conditions in the report for Council's consideration if they approve the proposed development Prior to the City Council hearing, Staff recommends the following revisions to the plans and/or updated information is submitted at least 15 days prior to the City Council hearing: • In the holding area south of W.Ramblin Dr.,the mid-box retail and office park should switch locations(see pgs.5-6 for more information). This change was made. • Relocate the plaza area in the holding area on the south side of Ramblin further to the south to a more central location for accessibility of the users of the commercial/office park and better integration into the site(see pgs.5-6 for more information). This change was made. • Submit details for the plazas/open space areas in the commercial portions of the development that demonstrate they'll be integrated centers of activity and activated with permanent design elements and amenities in accord with the Mixed-Use guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan (see pg. 7 for more information). This change was made (see exhibit in Section VII.J). • Relocate the common areas in the multi-family portion of the development where the dog park, clubhouse, swimming pool&tot lot are located from along the collector street to a more central location within the development(see pgs. 7& 17 for more information). The Applicant would like to keep the originally proposed locations for the amenities as they feel the location is appropriate. • Submit revised legal descriptions and exhibit maps for the proposed L-O and C-G zoned areas south of Ramblin in the holding area(see pg. 11 for more information). These items will be submitted prior to approval of the Findings if Council approves Staff's recommended changes. • Revise the preliminary plat phasing plan to reflect Phases 2 and 3 being swapped. The Applicant revised the phasing plan to reflect Phases I and 2 of the multi family development being swapped—the phasing plan was not revised as requested to reflect Phase 3 (the commercial portion) as Phase 2 so that some commercial services would be available for the residents in Phase 1 while the next phase is being constructed. • Reloeate the emer-geney aeeess via W. Chinden Blvd./SH 20 26 to the west boundary of the site(see ^s 12 13 for-more info-mation).Because Ramblin is now proposed to extend to the west to Rustic Oak with the]"phase of development, the Fire Dept. is no longer requiring an emergency access be provided via Chinden; and because UDC 11-3H-4D.3b (noise abatement for residential uses along state highways)doesn't allow breaks in the berm/wall along Chinden, Staff requests this access be removed entirely. A. PLANNING DIVISION Annexation &Zoning 1. A Development Agreement(DA) is required as a provision of annexation of this property. Prior to approval of the annexation ordinance, a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner(s)at the time of annexation ordinance adoption, and the developer. Currently, a fee of$303.00 shall be paid by the Applicant to the Planning Division prior to commencement of the DA. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the City Council approval of the annexation Findings. Page 64 The DA shall,at minimum, incorporate the following provisions IF City Council determines annexation is in the best interest of the City: a. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat,phasing plan, site plan, landscape plan, conceptual development plan and conceptual building elevations and renderings included in Section VII and the provisions contained herein. b. Future development shall demonstrate general consistency with the Medium Density Residential and Mixed-Use guidelines and specifically the Mixed Use—Regional guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan.Mixed use areas should be centered around spaces that are well-designed public and quasi-public centers of activity. Spaces should be activated and incorporate permanent design elements and amenities that foster a wide variety of interests ranging from leisure to play. These areas shall be thoughtfully integrated into the development and further placemaking opportunities considered. c. The design of all future structures on this site, except for single-family detached structures, shall comply with the standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. d. A 10-foot wide detached sidewalk/multi-use pathway shall be provided within the required street buffers along N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Ramblin Dr., as proposed.A 10 foot wide detached sidewalk/pathway already exists along W. Chinden Blvd.ISH 20-26. e. A 25-foot wide buffer to adjoining residential uses shall be provided in the commercial district(s)with lot development and shall be landscaped in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. f. The density of the single-family residential area depicted on the conceptual development plan for the holding area in Section VII.D shall develop with a gross density between 3 and 8 units/acre consistent with the Medium Density Residential Future Land Use Map designation in the Comprehensive Plan. g. The restaurant(i.e. coffee shop)with a drive-through shall require approval of a conditional use permit in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-11 —Drive-through Establishment. wall,h. The emer-geney aeeess driveway via W. Chinden Blvd.414 20 26 shall be removed when WL. Ramblin Dr. is exended to the west to N. Pwsfie Oak Dr. At that fifne,the befffl, landseaping a-ad pathway shall be extended aefess this area. PefmaaepA dir-eet aoeess via W. Cain,, -Blv SH 20 26 :s r.,,hibite .An emergency access driveway via Chinden is no longer needed with the extension of Ramblin to the west to Rustic Oak with the Is'phase of development. i. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications and/or issuance of any building permits. Additionally,the area south of W. Ramblin Dr. depicted in Section VII.D as a holding area for future redevelopment and Phases 4 and 5 of the preliminary plat, shall be further subdivided prior to submittal of any Certificate of Zoning Compliance applications and/or issuance of any building permits within that area. j. Prior to any development occurring in the holding area south of W. Ramblin Dr., an amendment shall be required to the Development Agreement to include an updated conceptual development plan and building elevations for that area that demonstrate consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. Preliminary Plat: 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: Page 65 a. A cross-access/ingress-egress easement shall be granted to the out-parcel(Parcel #S0428111201) at the northeast corner of this site for future access and interconnectivity via W. Ramblin Dr. either by recorded easement or as an note on the recorded final plat in accord with UDC 11-3A-3A. b. Include a detail(i.e. cross-section)for the alley that demonstrates compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3B.5. c. Include a note that prohibits direct access to W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26. d. Graphically depict a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement for the multi-use pathway along N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 if located outside the adjacent road right-of-way and include a note with the recorded easement numbers. e. Depict a minimum 5-foot wide setback for drainage from the alley that provides access to the townhomes in Block 3 as set forth in UDC 11-2A-3H. 3. The landscape plan submitted with the final plat shall include the following revisions: a. Depict landscaping within the 35' wide street buffers along W. Chinden Blvd. &N. Black Cat Rd. and the 20' wide street buffer along W. Ramblin Dr. in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.3; enhanced features are required along entryway corridors(i.e. Chinden& Black Cat). If the unimproved right-of-way(ROW) is 10' or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, depict landscaping(i.e. lawn or other vegetative groundcover)in the remainder of the area as set forth in UDC 11-313-7C.5. b. Include a detail/cross-section of the berm and wall within the street buffer along W. Chinden Blvd. that demonstrates compliance with the noise abatement standards in UDC 11-3H-4D. Include the elevation of the centerline of W. Chinden Blvd. in relation to the top of the wall and the method of variation in the wall(i.e. color and/or texture or staggered every 300'). Breaks in the berm/wall are not allowed. c. Depict landscaping, including trees and bushes, along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. d. Include mitigation information for all existing trees being removed from the site in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-I0C 5. e. Depict a minimum 5-foot wide setback for drainage from the alley that provides access to the townhomes in Block 3 as set forth in UDC 11-2A-3H. f. inelude a detail for-the area where the emer-geney aeeess driveway is proposed thftt shOws hOw the area will be improved with a befmlwall,!a-ndseapiag and pathway onee the driveway i& mod-Remove the emergency access driveway via Chinden Blvd. and extend the buffer(i.e. berm/wall landscaping and pathway)across this area.An emergency access driveway via Chinden is no longer needed with the extension ofRamblin to the west to Rustic Oak with the 1st phase of development. g. Depict the edge of pavement on the plan. If the unimproved street right-of-way along W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 is 10-feet or greater from the edge of pavement to edge of sidewalk or property line, depict a 10-foot wide compacted shoulder meeting the construction standards of the transportation authority and landscape the remainder with lawn or other vegetative ground cover in accord with UDC 11-3B-7C.5. 4. All irrigation ditches,laterals, sloughs or canals, crossing this site shall be piped or otherwise covered as set forth in UDC 11-3A-6B.3,unless waived by City Council. Page 66 5. All existing structures shall be removed from the site prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature. 6. Comply with the subdivision design and improvement standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3. 7. A private street application shall be submitted for the multi-family portion of the development on Lot 10,Block 1 with the final plat for that portion of the development for addressing purposes;the private streets shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. 8. A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement is required for the multi-use pathway along N. Black Cat Rd. and W. Chinden Blvd./SH 2O-26 if located outside the adjacent road right-of-way;the easement shall be submitted with the final plat application for the phase in which it's located(see Park's Dept. comments below in Section VIII.J for more information). 9. Approval of a preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat. Upon written request and filing by the applicant prior to the termination of the period,the director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two (2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the director or City Council may require the preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of this title. Conditional Use Permit(Multi-Family Development): 10. The trash enclosures shall contain receptacles to accommodate recycling. 11. Compliance with the specific use standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27 for Multi-family Developments is required. 12. The site plan shall be revised as follows: a. Depict a directory and map of the development at each of the entrances or in a convenient location for those entering the development in accord with UDC 11-4-3-27B.7d. b. Depict three(3)bicycle parking spaces for each building and four(4)bicycle parking spaces at the clubhouse(exterior)that demonstrate compliance with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C- 5C. c. Depict minimum 7-foot wide sidewalks where parking spaces abut sidewalks and wheel stops aren't provided to prevent overhang; or depict wheel stops in parking spaces so vehicles don't overhang beyond the designated parking stall dimension in accord with UDC 11-3C-5B (the length of parking spaces may be decreased by 2-feet if 7-foot wide sidewalks are provided). 13. The landscape plan shall be revised as follows: a. Depict landscaping along the foundations of all street facing elevations per the standards set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27E.2. b. Depict landscaping along all pathways per the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-12C. 14. A legally binding document shall be recorded that states the maintenance and ownership responsibilities for the management of the development,including,but not limited to, structures, parking, common areas, and other development features as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27F. A copy of such shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy within the development. Page 67 15. Multifamily developments with units that take access via secured common corridors shall install and maintain a keyless entry system, or suitable alternative,to provide police access to the common corridors under exigent circumstances as set forth in UDC 11-4-3-27G. The keyless entry system or alternative shall be subject to review and approval by the Meridian Police Department. 16. All structures are required to comply with the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. 17. In phased developments, common open space shall be provided in each phase of the development consistent with the requirements for the size and number of dwelling units per UDC 11-4-3-27C.7. The Applicant shall demonstrate compliance with this standard with the Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for the first phase of the multi-family development. B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT https:11web1ink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=309843&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City C. MERIDIAN FIRE DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridianciU.orgJ ebLink1DocView.aspx?id=309846&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU D. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID) https:llweblink.meridiancioy.orkIWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=311601&dbid=0&repo=MeridiancioX E. SETTLER'S IRRIGATION DISTRICT(SID) https:llweblink.meridianciU.orgJ ebLink1DocView.aspx?id=309892&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiU https:llweblink.meridianciiy.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=353258&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City F. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ) https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=309945&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity https:llweblink.meridiancio!.orglWebLinklDoc View.aspx?id=353833&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCi0! G. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES(ACDS) https:llweblink.meridianciLy.orglWebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=310610&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity https:llweblink.meridiancitE.orglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=353951&dbid=0&repo=Meridiy City H. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD) https:11weblink.meridiancity.orglWebLink/DocView.aspx?id=311352&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiiy I. COMMUNITY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO https:llweblink.meridiancitE.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=311177&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX J. PARK'S DEPARTMENT https:llweblink.meridiancitE.oLvlWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=309877&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity K. KUNA SCHOOL DISTRICT https:llweblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=352802&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City Page 68 L. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD) https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/Doc View.aspx?id=354468&dbid=0&repo=Meridian City M. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD) -REVISED https://weblink.meridiancit E.ofglWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=355775&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX IX. FINDINGS A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the Applicant's proposed map amendment to the R-8, R-15, R-40 and C-G zoning districts for the development of multi family apartments, townhome dwellings, retail, restaurant office and single-family dwellings provides a mix of uses as desired; however, the site layout is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as noted in Section IV. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment complies with the purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute to the range of housing opportunities in this area consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; however, the Commission also finds the proposed density will put too much burden on the current infrastructure at this time. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and welfare; The Commission finds the proposed map amendment may be detrimental to the public health due to the future residents of the multi family development being located directly adjacent to Chinden Blvd. a state highway; and may be detrimental to the public safety and welfare due to the anticipated burden on current infrastructure, specifically the added traffic impacts from the proposed development on Black Cat Rd. where road improvements are not scheduled until 2036-2040. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds City services are available to be provided to this development. Comments were received from WASD on this application that are included above in Section VIII.L. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. The Commission finds the proposed annexation is not in the best interest of the city at this time due to the proposed density putting too much burden on current infrastructure and the proposed site plan not supporting centrally located integrated common open space within the multi family portion of the development. Page 69 B. Conditional Use Permit(UDC 11-513-6E) The Commission shall base its determination on the Conditional Use Permit requests upon the following: 1. That the site is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and meet all the dimensional and development regulations in the district in which the use is located. The Commission finds that the subject property is large enough to accommodate the proposed use and dimensional and development regulations of the R-40 zoning district(see Analysis, Section V for more information). 2. That the proposed use will be harmonious with the Meridian Comprehensive Plan and in accord with the requirements of this Title. The Commission finds the proposed multi family development and density is consistent with the future land use map designation of MU-R in the Comprehensive Plan and is allowed as a conditional use in UDC Table 11-2A-2 in the R-40 zoning district; however,finds the proposed density will put too much burden on current infrastructure at this time until improvements are made to Black Cat Rd. to accommodate the additional traffic generated from this development. 3. That the design,construction, operation and maintenance will be compatible with other uses in the general neighborhood and with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not adversely change the essential character of the same area. The Commission finds the proposed design of the development, construction, operation and maintenance should be compatible with the mix of other uses planned for and existing in this area and with the intended character of the area and that such uses should not adversely change the character of the area. The Commission also finds the proposed development will adversely impact traffic and public safety in this area without improvements to Black Cat Rd., which aren't planned until 2036-2040. 4. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions of the approval imposed, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity. The Commission finds the proposed use should not adversely affect other property in the area. 5. That the proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, schools, parks, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal,water,and sewer. The Commission finds that essentialpublic services are available to this property and that the use will be adequately served by these facilities if Council approves the application. C. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170,8-30-2005,eff. 9-15-2005) 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; (Ord.08-1372,7-8-2008,eff. 7-8-2008) The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with the UDC and generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan except for the items noted in Section X pertaining to site layout. Page 70 2. Public services are available or can be made available and are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development if approved by City Council. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital improvement program; The Commission finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP); however, Black Cat Rd., which provided access for the site isn't scheduled in the CIP to be widened from 2-1anes to 5-lanes from Chinden to McMillan until between 2036 and 2040. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development may be detrimental to the public health due to the future residents of the multi family development being located directly adjacent to Chinden Blvd,. a state highway, rather than adjacent to a local or collector street as desired in the Comprehensive Plan; and may be detrimental to the public safety and welfare due to the anticipated burden on current infrastructure, specifically the added traffic impacts from the proposed development on Black Cat Rd. where road improvements are not scheduled until between 2036 and 2040. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features.(Ord.05-1170,8-30- 2005,eff. 9-15-2005) The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. Page 71 C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation Blayden Annexation, Zoning, Preliminary Plat & CUP Request Subdivision FUTURE MEDICALFUTURE 38.58 ACRES:ANNEXATION ABOUT RIDGE SUBDIVISIONBLAYDEN SCHOOL FLUM for in the Comp Plan.50% of the MDR area as allowed R to -We are extending the MUSCHOOLC-MUR-MU& Medium DensityR) -Mixed Use Residential (MU DESIGNATION:PROPERTY RUTSCHOOLFUTURE 8-G, R-15, C-40, R-R PROPOSED ZONING:ZONING 8-RG-CRUT15-R40-R6-R R-R8-RG-C-R ZONING 8-RG-C15-R 5.30 acres14.145 acres1.83 acres16.70 acres 40- PLAT COMMERCIALHOLDING AREA (SFR)(COMMERCIAL)HOLDING AREATOWNHOMESFAMILY-MULTI 25101 family lots (future holding area)-Singlecommercial lots (4 + 1 future holding area)townhome lotsfamily lot (312 units)-multi 1 RAMBLIN DR 132 Emergency access to Chinden BlvdDrRamblinAccess from Black Cat Rd via DrRamblinAccess from Rustic Oak via ACCESS BLACK CAT RDCHINDEN BLVD 32 CHINDEN BLVDRAMBLIN DR Phase 1of a part Rustic Oak, as Dr to RamblinBuild ACCESS RUSTIC OAK MULTI SPACEOPEN Required 15%•15.2%–Provided •TOWNHOMESRequired 10%•10.53%-Provided •- •TOT LOTPLAZAPLAZAGARDENSCOMMUNITY CLUBHOUSEDOG PARK AMENITIES Plazas•Community gardens, shelters, picnic areas•Tot lot•Dog park•storage, dog wash stationsPool, kitchen, meeting rooms, covered bike •Clubhouse PHASE residentialfamily -Future singleFuture commercialCommercial buildings, central plazafamily, townhomes, 2 office -to Black Cat, ½ multiRamblinfamily, dog park, clubhouse/pool-to Rustic Oak, ½ multiRamblin PLAN HOLDING PHASE 5PHASE 4 family residential-Future single•Phase 5•Future commercial•Phase 4 •AREA HOLDING AREA CONCEPT TIMELINE 2032*(after CC&R’s are resolved)PHASE 4 & 5 2030 PHASE 3 2028 PHASE 2 2025 PHASE 1 STAFF Relocate emergency access•Relocate clubhouse/pool/dog park•O -and LG -Submit new legals for CSubmit details for plazaRelocate plaza in holding areabox and office locations in holding area-RECOMMENDATIONS RENDERINGS DELICA TOWNHOMES DELICA APARTMENTS DELICA APARTMENTS DELICA APARTMENTS DELICA APARTMENTS DELICA GARDENSCOMMUNITY DELICA POOL/CLUBHOUSE DELICA CLUBHOUSE DELICA CLUBHOUSE DELICA POOL DELICA TOT LOT DELICA DOG PARK DELICA DOG PARK DELICA PLAZA DELICA PLAZA DELICA PLAZA DELICA PLAZA DELICA PLAZA DELICA PLAZA DELICA PLAZA DELICA DELICA CBH - BLAYDEN W CHINDEN BLVD MERIDIAN, ID 83646 ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE APRIL 05, 2023 At 5 t a COLE/A RIC H I TECTS ARCHITECTURE / PUNNING / INTERIOR DESIGN UNIT PLANS/ UNIT PLANS/ 1 -BED, 1 -BATH SCALE: NTS X X X X 25'-0" 25'_0" 10'4" 14'_4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 3'-0" 1 -BED / 1 -BATH o oop X ENTRY UNIT SQUARE FOOTAGE: 1-BED/1-BATH: 764 SF 5 - a o +82 SF OUTDOOR PATIO 1 0/-9"X V/—O// aD (LEVEL 01) :5,_s,.: - 1._61' V C -OR- +82 SF OUTDOOR BALCONY a o N o (LEVEL 02 & LEVEL 03) _ 1 �/Q U) tD iV 0/-9//X V/-0" N n i� - - -(- - - - �y au oar f o1 0 o0o 7 BEDROOM - D 0 0 N 4 ih PANTRY O_ PATIO o � — X 3'3" 6 2'-11" 6'-3" 5'-6" 5'-0" 3'-0" 11'-4" 10'-" 14'_4" 25'-0" 25'-0" X X X X TYPE A UNIT/ TYPE B UNIT/ PROVIDED FOR 2% OF ALL UNITS, LOCATED ON LEVEL LOCATED ON GROUND FLOOR ONLY; LEVEL 02 &03 WILL HAVE 01 ONLY SAME FLOOR PLAN ALTHOUGH WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AN ADA ACCESSIBLE UNIT. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE UNIT PLANS/ 2-BED, 2-BATH SCALE: NTS X X X X 37'-0" 37'-0" 64" 6"6" 5'4" 5'-9" 12'-6" 6-11" 12'-0" 11'-3" 3_D" 5'-2" 5'-7" 2-BED / 2-13ATH M O„O V 0v0 PATIO (V UNIT SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2-BED/2-BATH UNIT: 1,096 SF BEDROOM BEDROOM. op +82 SF OUTDOOR PATIO 2'-4" 4' 10/-9"X Q V/-0" O 6'-4" � LAU DRY M V A 60 (LEVEL 01) -OR- - M N +82 SF OUTDOOR BALCONYLAY No ° o (LEVEL�/02 & LEVEL 03) 10/-9"x Q V/-0// 7_0BO ''•'__ _ Q 00 U - - i0 W... 0v0 - -- - - --- - -- - - - - - - X cX) X - � X 11'-3" 2'-10" 5'-6" 5'-7" 5'-6" 9'-0" 3'-6" 12'-1" 6-5" 25'-9" 11'-3" 37-0" 37'-0" X X X X TYPE A UNIT/ TYPE B UNIT/ PROVIDED FOR 2% OF ALL UNITS, LOCATED ON LEVEL 01 ONLY LOCATED ON GROUND FLOOR ONLY; LEVEL 02 &03 WILL HAVE SAME FLOOR PLAN ALTHOUGH WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AN ADA ACCESSIBLE UNIT. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE UNIT PLANS/ 3-BED, 2-BATH SCALE: NTS X X X X 40'-0" 40'-0" 5-9" 9" 6'4" 12'-9" 9'-5" 5'-0" 12'-0" 11'4" 8" 5'S" 10'-7" 3-BED / 2-13ATH cX -� - - � - (X) X - - X UNIT SQUARE FOOTAGE: STORAGE A r 3-BED/2-BATH: 1,181 SF +82 SF OUTDOOR PATIOEDo M o fV BEDROOM / // / // 10-9 x8-0 ---- - -,._ �O LAU RV (LEVEL 01) Mcp -OR- 6 5 6„ 0 PATIO O +82 SF OUTDOOR BALCONY v (LEVEL 02 & LEVEL 03) N , ij:,.t 10/-9"x Q V/-0" M - m17 q .1IF 11 Its •`n.�' *,••_ V'lI J'�- .�y.;H -.��f,.'��y., f' � �V 11-I �N N in IM 1 6 �_0� �_0" oo - -•-�r_8" - - _ _- _- _ -__ -_ - - -•5_6���__ __ _ __ __ ____ ';.g_g�t.: _ _ -- _- - C _ LA DRY V N I�IIII J ro _ _ _ •••tlR00 �M-`•- <O - - - "•BEbRO,OM•�, - - - �.•� M, - ��gTcbR00 - N lL i• - 1 cX X 6 6 3 1 3 3 12 5" 9 9" 12'-0" 11'-4" 6" 5'-5" 35'-0" 5'-0" 40A., 40'-0" X X TYPE A UNIT/ TYPE B UNIT/ PROVIDED FOR 2% OF ALL UNITS, LOCATED ON LEVEL 01 ONLY LOCATED ON GROUND FLOOR ONLY; LEVEL 02 &03 WILL HAVE SAME FLOOR PLAN ALTHOUGH WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AN ADA ACCESSIBLE UNIT. FIRE RISER LOCATION CONVERTED TO UNIT STORAGE CLOSET ON LEVEL 02 &03. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING A - LEVEL 01 SCALE: NTS NOTE:TYPE A UNITS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE UNIT MIX PER BUILDING A (4 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH: 7 UNITS/FLR=21 TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL Al A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 (A10 200'-0" AA 8'-0" 37'-0" 37'-0" 8'-0" 25'-0" 37'-0" 8'-0" 37'-0" '-0' B2.2 n—� B2.2 B2.2 r-i —i uui A1.1 � a—�i mLAA2 CV - - - FI ,i 0 UP UP " 17" � .UP aF CD � _ i B2.2 B3.2 �i—n - =i� N B2.2 i = �+ai _ 131.1 AE - AF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING A - LEVEL 02 SCALE: NTS UNIT MIX PER BUILDING A (4 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH: 7 UNITS/FLR=21 TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL Al A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A 10 200'-01, 8'-0" 37'-0" 37'-0" 8'-0" 25'-0" 37'-0" 8'-0" 37'-0" '-0' AA -371 ir 7ai B2.2 — ii _ — B2.2 B2.2 —� _ u i i Hvu B1.1 i B2.2 N — i — 00 Ef DN DN AC 0 cc DD _ ❑ T u i r��r� o ❑i u�� _ o= ® Imp UP _ UP to B3.2 00 B2.2 — G B2.2 B2.2 � i — u-u B1.1 AE =, AF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING A - LEVEL 03 SCALE: NTS UNIT MIX PER BUILDING A (4 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH: 7 UNITS/FLR=21 TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL Al A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 200'-0" 8'-0" 37'-0" 37'-0" &A 264' 3740" 8'-0" 37'-0" '-0' AA ABVol nfi B2.2 B2.2 B2.2 t B2.2 —� j —iNwm B1.1 .�, —u DN DN � DN � - - � L_j 0 _ —i —n 'B�3_.2 B2.2 1AHN Diu B2.2 B1.1— AF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING B - LEVEL 01 SCALE: NTS NOTE:TYPE A UNITS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE UNIT MIX PER BUILDING B (4 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH:0 UNITS/FLR=0 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH:6 UNITS/FLR= 18TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6TOTAL B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 167'-0" B n 37'-0" 8'-0" 37'-0" 37'-0" 8'-0" 40'-0" F_� L��L 11 E�l 11F 11 5�1 F-1 77 71F Ej /"� -7-771 BB - FIE L— - 1 I NVHVI VHV in 82.2 N 82.2 N u—u B2.2 - i A3.2 a UP OQ UP �B3.2i 19 N ii B2.2 B2.2 �i=u i -ai = is 132.2 _f BF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING B - LEVEL 02 SCALE: NTS UNIT MIX PER BUILDING B (4 ON SITE): 1—BED/1—BATH:0 UNITS/FLR=0 TOTAL 2—BED/2—BATH:6 UNITS/FLR= 18TOTAL 3—BED/2—BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6TOTAL B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 167'-0" BA 37'-0" 8'-0" 37'-0" 37'-0" 8'-0" 40'-0" BB 7u B2.2 Ei B2.2 N —u a—i B3.2 DN ® DN CDC C [F�_w IL BDcdv0 0 ® 'up —i — ,W932 N j - I-II - rB2.2 Wll-4 - ;� II-I - - VIHIII IH I I HN B2.2 = d=� B2.2 BF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH — BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING B - LEVEL 03 SCALE: NTS UNIT MIX PER BUILDING B (4 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH:0 UNITS/FLR=0 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH:6 UNITS/FLR= 18TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6TOTAL B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 167'-0" BA 37'-0" 8'-0" 37'-0" 37'-0" 8'-0" 40'-0" BB El f. B2.2 n VHV u"u CO a=i B2.2 = —i B2.2 N _ —u ai B3.2 DN DN BC ® ® - _ T lam__ III�II --�1 II p B3.2 N B2.2 i—i iAHA 1AHN MAIN iii it-i — - ii i- B2.2 — + B2.2 [771 BF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING C - LEVEL 01 SCALE: NTS NOTE:TYPE A UNITS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE UNIT MIX PER BUILDING C (8 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL Cl C2 C3 C4 73'-0" CA 25'-0" 8'-0" 40'-0" LJ A2.2 -n A1.1CC - N ma CC o - CD UP B3.2 N B 1.1 CF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING C - LEVEL 02 SCALE: NTS UNIT MIX PER BUILDING C (8 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL Cl C2 C3 C4 73'-0" CA 25'-0" 8'-0" 40'-0" LL B2.2 - - o B1.1 �wui i N DN CC � CDC ® UP cl B3.2 VHh OHM N 1131.11 CE � CF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ BUILDING C - LEVEL 03 SCALE: NTS UNIT MIX PER BUILDING C (8 ON SITE): 1-BED/1-BATH: 2 UNITS/FLR=6 TOTAL 2-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL 3-BED/2-BATH: 1 UNITS/FLR=3 TOTAL Cl C2 C3 C4 73'-0" CA 25'-0" 8'-0" 40'-0" � I B2.2 WHO N _ Flyl DN B3.2 19 °° B1.1 N 19 CE CF CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS/ CLUBHOUSE CONTEXT PLAN/ SCALE: 1/32"= V-0" j .�, 7L � �rtoR �a FLOOR PLAN/ 33'-6' 20'-0" 18'-6" 4-4- 32'-0' 14'-0" 18'-0' 3'-6" 4'-0" 6'-4" 5-0" 3'-2" 3'-6" 5-0" T-0" 7'-8" 12'4" SCALE: 1/16"= V-0" CEL 4 OFFICE OFF,I¢E -;S.TORAGE'' q MAINTEN, Eli WOMEN RESTROOM S W ALL 0 o xx DOG W4SH_. aJ0 m V RECEPTION f f z LOUNGE Iq MENS ` MAINTENANCE/ \ t; _ OUTDOOR FIEPAIR/EkyUIPdYfEQy7 BBQ AREA 2'-6" 6'-0" 4'-0" — g .r: $IKE S70RAGE�. 2'-0"..................................................................................................................... 4'. 2'-p^ 2'-0^ 3•_6" 12•_0" 3•_6" 4-4- 12'-0" 4'0" 2'-0" 16'-4" 2-4- 2'-6" 12'_0" 2•_6" 2'-0" 4•_0" 12'-6" 12'-0" 20'-0^ 19'-0" 20'4" 20'-0^ 17'4" 12'-0" 132-6" CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH — BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE MULTIFAMILY MATERIAL SCHEME DISTRIBUTION/ MULTIFAMILY EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEME DISTRIBUTION/ SITE PLAN I rum i I 0.1 TTHI um _Wrrw IT�T� V--I-T I-I A ------------------------ ----T - ------------------------- -------------- ------------------ -------------------------------------------- 7) 12-PLEX 12-PLEX 12-PLEX 12-PLEX SCHEME 01 SCHEME 02 SCHEME 01 SCHEME 02 i 30-PLEX 30-PLEX 30-PLEX 30-PLEX SCHEME 03 SCHEME 04 SCHEME 03 SCHEME 04 I I 24-PLEX 24-PLEX 24-PLEX 24-PLEX SCHEME 04 SCHEME 03 SCHEME 04 SCHEME 03 12-PLEX 12-PLEX 12-PLEX 12-PLE SCHEME 01 SCHEME 02 SCHEME 01 SCHEME 02 I L-------------------------------------}-------------------- - ---------------------- � I N ow"" eases eases eases m , CLUBHOUPRO SE m -------------------------------- ""--- - El El El El El El El �� N ------------------------ ---------L- -------- CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE MATERIAL SCHEMES/ . i y y, �2r�.f i T w 5. pyryF5' -..� t Fs r^.,rf'•^. 5 ,+� •t,•�ji R•,'•t�� tam" e a .i fiw y,L.� }+�A 7:�,,��y 1•k.FK�t���y�{� �.L�.Y t��} q ���^��. ram• A i >a MIN P J .J YCnC t Fs r^.,rf'•^. 5 ,+� ti' Jt R•'•� t1� a�a�" .i fiw . 1 � 1 1 � 1 ' : '• : 1 06 -- 17 �`x l � 'rFr fix• ��,x{-xf l� t Fs r^.,rf'•^. 5 ,+� ti' Jt R•'•� t1� a�a�" .i fiw y� -X''� �. Ec2f,y 'tg's'yEcF'{SY" '3 x� fT yn w `�S a�x ;rk //CSL ?jR�r d� `Q . 1 � 1 1 � 1 ' : '• : 1 Iowa PAN" ; -- im t Fs r^.,rf'•^. 5 ,+� ti' Jt R•'•� t1� a�a�" .i fiw x,, . 1 � 1 1 � 1 ' : '• : 1 Iowa PA 17 t Fs r^.,rf'•^. 5 ,+� ti' Jt R•'•� t1� a�a�" .i fiw . 1 � 1 1 � 1 ' : '• : 1 ELEVATIONS/ ELEVATIONS/ CLUBHOUSE PRIMARY SECONDARY ACCENT ROOFING METAL WINDOWS/ MATERIAL MATERIAL MATERIAL DOORS NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 0000 SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION CO L E/�RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ELEVATIONS/ 12-PLEX - SCHEME 01 le UPPER BASE MATERIAL PANELS/RAILS ROOFING METAL WINDOWS/ MATERIAL MATERIAL DOORS B.O.ROOF TRUSS n &-3 3/4"V LEVEL vz03 n zi-s FF I UF1 -P IU 11 11 — — — LEVo 9 iO4 I uAlm u 001, ea LH HU I I a LEVEL 01 n NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION C O L E/A RICH I T E C TS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ELEVATIONS/ 12—PLEX — SCHEME 02 le UPPER BASE MATERIAL PANELS/RAILS ROOFING METAL WINDOWS/ MATERIAL MATERIAL DOORS B.O.ROOF T 32'-3 3/4•'VRUSS n LEVEL03 n - - - zi-sFr LEVEL 0 l Flo, 2 lo•-e v4• � � ® 00 � � � BO ■ 0 ULI L!FJ LEVEL 01 n NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 0 IN „ ■ SO UTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION C O L E/A RICH I T E C TS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ELEVATIONS/ 24-PLEX - SCHEME 03 UPPER BASE MATERIAL PANELS/RAILS ROOFING METAL WINDOWS/ MATERIAL MATERIAL DOORS B.O.ROOF TRUSS &-3 3/4" LEVEGL10IN IN ONE Nil IN IN IN LEVE a 10a I will III 'k. 1 LEVEL 01 --- NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION El oil SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION C O L E/A RICH I T E C TS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ELEVATIONS/ 24-PLEX - SCHEME 04 UPPER BASE MATERIAL PANELS/RAILS ROOFING METAL WINDOWS/ MATERIAL MATERIAL DOORS .O.ROOF TRUSS _ 32'-3-113 V LEVEL vz'03 n zi•-s V LEVEL 02" 10•-9 va• 7` LEVEL 0j NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION IN IN IN ONE mll � x IN ON FAA 0 SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION C O L E/A RICH I T E C TS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ELEVATIONS/ 30-PLEX - SCHEME 03 ert.- - B.O.ROOF TRUSS 32'-3 3T UPPER BASE MATERIAL PANELS/RAILS LEzE61oz MATERIAL MATERIAL Ll T7 il 11 lu'-9 14 �w :y$ J LEVEL 01% ROOFING WINDOWS/ DOORS NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION Jim- :t s WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION C O L E/A RICH I T E C TS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ELEVATIONS/ 30-PLEX - SCHEME 04 B.O.ROOF TRUSS S 32'-3 3%4" II 03 UPPER BASE MATERIAL PANELS/RAILS - - LEZE6112 ti MATERIAL MATERIAL LEVEL 02,\ LEVEL 01 L, R( METAL WINDOWS/ DOORS NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION C O L E/A RICH I T E C TS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SITE PLANS/ SITE PLANS/ AREA OF SCOPE SCALE: NTS -_.-_ 58924'50-E1307.08' -___-_- E1/18_ N6825'49'w W. CHINDEN BLVD. _______ S21 S22 _.._ s S.27 o:'O z 1 N 89'25'20'W ,142.27' 1 , __ _ _ __ _._ __ _ __ _..-------- --------- -- ___- _ _ ___ _ -__ --. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ _�.___________-_.—_ -------------- der ISan:r N rJa•�_ � I _�'CtY J1' / —_—_—_ 2>9' FUTURE COMMERCIAL 1 GT rT r _ 7 r '.o ' 6305 N BLACK 4 HE 5 �I CAT RD `• _ �z,•,� ',�, r c r'81•'"I a �..12,<e<.�_ _ __ t- �...J - C.� 'ro - - - s r�.9 io k�J =� N G 1 �( N8918'10'W __. - r 7x �, 37• _'�7Y _ S0-W49'f1S0.00' f 3 1 , z3sl<�J},.� _ __ eos.��.eetw'o. s.�,1u' r.. $4�43,-,•,s_ 1 .� I ww --J - EXIONGm I , _ L_BCK 1 F 'HREDs390T0 1 1nnIN S h I ' rta � I I �II•,6 I = I � J iY9 2 L _.__ iJ 36 �ji Y m 8 11.Oa61 el - i 3 assd 8LO_K. a — ' •' 6A,92A) OMMERC- IAL ,I Q t$ 1 Ii Zy UNYLA TTED d" 1�__.____ zuT _—_ _ I —_ ____—_JJL-_—_—___�- N I ns ; ` ___ 35.501 6.73t 1'• 1 � lee' mr � -? i I `i z I ae L I 1 _ o' r . �,•J k_I V 6055 N BUCK I l 1 - -� I I I `- �•----- CAT RD L - - - _.� `\ BLOCK 3 1 r' Imo}- - _ 'n i w.- 'I 'Illl� pt r, t �JF'i r I`T r t� �r, r — — —F tq t 1 22t1}1+}��7 a r� I 6L� J L 22.2G9 1 �' - ��_-I.�.ii_._ 9h—u ----- - ' ------ --------- --- ---- ---- p - \� \�' I -� r- ---- -� ---- - ' i. .an --- -------- :ae• ---------- --- 1 -o n38a I �O,_, 13 m' 8 I 1 14 15 I� 16 -- -- - --- --------- - I` o� o ® cTOWNHOMES BY OTHERS 9' ,o 2 ---- - ---- - -- -- ------ W. - -- sn Ss,. SszoF ISsxo 25• - y <.,ao - �o !, 2101 a.a�a•-• .. 2.6a< 7.697 .J.7.• !f I < 3<61 < ' EXIS SETBACKS (MU-R R-15) o I>r _ ---- I i Ir HOMENd y �- 2 —J L— JB/J J L L ' A Oz 2a' zr r s7 -.e' zr a• 3• dG OC1C L o I.481 el N89'1756`M 7 n 7 n - 415.79 ��L- _.. N899756'W 860.18 B.r��-....u....tix NORTH SETBACK:0-0 (25 -0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO BE PROVIDED, SEE NOTE BELOW) SOUTH SETBACK: 12'-0"(REAR SETBACK) WEST SETBACK: 3'-0"(INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK) EAST SETBACK: 3'-0"(INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK) -LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG HWY 20:25'-0" -PROVIDE MULTI-USE PATHWAY ALONG HWY 20 -NO EASEMENTS WITHIN AREA OF SCOPE C O L E/A RC H I T E C TS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SITE PLANS/ OVERALL SITE LAYOUT SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" THE NUMBERS W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - — — - — - - - - — - - - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - —I- - - - - MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS: 16 CLUBHOUSE: 1 (6,400 SF)-SINGLE STORY I III l �F �FT 99°„ 99°„ of °a MULTIFAMILY BUILDING TYPES:3 ° 9g-°,. 99._°„ �,_ aa- as-° aa- -BUILDING TYPE A ^ o ar-o.. 81.4. ar-o° * ar-o^ +�+ ar-o^ * ar-o^ } a1,. N o -BUILDING TYPE B o ao------------ otru oo -BUILDING TYPE C I - 1�3 PGIFJI° - - 3PLEX - 6Z pG° GLEN - MULT4FAMILY MULTI-FNAILY o a o- o MULRFM.IILY o o MULTI-FNAILY NUMBER OF STORIES: 3 I I G`°G:� eL°GBLDG:AM n�.�. BLDG.`., TOTAL UNITS:312 MUL—MILY MUL 1-- M°'T F-ILY M°L,IFAM,LY ADJACENT ACCESSIBILITY: COMMERCIAL - - - - BUILDING -7 TYPE A UNITS (2%OF TOTAL) 4 4 4 4 -312 x 0.02 =6.24 (7, ROUNDED UP) -3 TYPE A 1-BED/1-BATH UNITS BLGG.ptJ BL°G.W� BLW.pit BLDG.B �Ga 0 000� 0�0�� aLD G a -2 TYPE A 2-BED/2-BATH UNITS = MULTIFAMILY MULTI—ILY : aM,LY MGL FAMILY -2 TYPE A 3-BED/2-BATH UNITS BL°G.p18 I C JLBLD.—I - - o o aLGG aLGGG / -TYPE A UNITSTO BE SPREAD AROUND SITE. ,]PL ILY „-PLE. ILY ILY M°L f,�ILYMUL-- MUL PAL, AM / -ALL GROUND FLOOR UNITS TO BE TYPE B. 0 0 00_-__-- onno � 0o aoo -TOTALTYPE B UNITS:97 -TOTAL STANDARD UNITS:208 a. a,1-°" a,' a,,-°^ e" ; a,•- -LOCATED ON UPPER LEVELS 991-°^ 81,_0„ 81._0.. 99._011 99._011 $1._0" ,°a'-°^ 99.-o" / I GWPaRK cLueHousE POOL W.RAMBLIN ST. i PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SITE PLANS/ UNIT MIX AROUND SITE SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" 1-BED 2-BED 3-BED 1-BATH 1-BATH 2-BATH C THE NUMBERS W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OVERALL UNIT MIX ON SITE -(72) 1-BED/1-BATH UNITS (23%) -(180) 2-BED/2-BATH UNITS (57%) 460) 3-BED/2-BATH UNITS (20%) 63'-0" 63'-0" 63'-0" 63'-0" 0 99'-0" 99'-0" 0 108'-0" 8,'-D" 0 8,'-9" 8,'-9" 8,'-9" e,'-6" 8,'-D" e1'-6" 8,'-9" 312 TOTAL UNITS (100%) + k LL a ao- atra oa El BUILDING TYPE A UNIT MIX (PER BLDG) _ - - 117 -(6) 1-BED/1-BATH UNITS -(21) 2-BED/2-BATH UNITS -(3) 3-BED/2-BATH UNITS m CAWACE T 30 TOTAL UNITS PER BUILDING J I L — BUILDING 4 4 (4) BUILDINGS - II--II--II 4 17 — BUILDING TYPE B UNIT MIX (PER BLDG) -(n/a) 1-BED/1-BATH UNITS - z -08) 2-BED/3-BATH UNITS s -(6) 3-BED/2-BATH UNITS 77 LL:o 0 00-7___j ouno 0o a00 24TOTAL UNITS PER BUILDING 81'-0" 81'-0" J 8I I 81'-0" 81'-0" 81'-0" 81'-0" \ � . (4) BUILDINGS 99'-0" 81'-0" 81.4. 99._6„ 99._6„ 81._6,. 108'_6" W.-O.. W-0" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUILDING TYPE C UNIT MIX (PER BLDG) DOG PARK CLUBHOUSE POOL , W.RAMBLIN ST. 0) 1-BED/1-BATH UNITS i - - - - - - - - - - - -(3) 2-BED/2-BATH UNITS - - - — -(3) 3-BED/2-BATH UNITS PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. 12 TOTAL UNITS PER BUILDING (8) BUILDINGS CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SITE PLANS/ FIRE SAFETY SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" THE NUMBERS W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - _ _ — _ _ — _ _ — _ _ — _ _ - - _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ — _ _ — _ _ — _ _ — _ -ALL FIRE RISER LOCATIONS ARE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREET. -FIRE HOSE LINES ARE ABLE TO COME IN TFFIT CONTACT AT GROUND LEVEL ALONG THE 0000 ENTIRE PERIMETER OF EACH BUILDING. A 911 o00 -aatruaa o00000 00o aa�naa------------ -DRIVE AISLES ARE 26-0 (TYPICAL). o,.F� ]LD J -CARPORTS LOCATED SOTHATTHE j_LLLLTWO PARKING STALLS ATTHETURNING atoL. 1 CORNERS ARE LEFT VACANT. M=` AM" pppppp M°`nF �r MLLTIIFAM" pppppp M°`T°�^" I -SEE CARPORT LOCATIONS SHEET. ADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING -SIDEWALK BUMP-UPS DO NOT CREATE 26-0„ A DEAD END FOR PARKING STALLS 26•0 — pppppp AROUND THE SITE.THE INTENTION pppppp BBLLo�a pppppp pppppp aLD. IS THAT THEY CREATE A DISTINCT 21 1-MULTI FAMILY MULTI—IL. Mtn�� M�LTFMIL. VARIATION IN GROUND TO HIGHLIGHT LD.L12L a`° at °' eLDGO A PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY PATHWAY, .1 M�LT.F L M� �.L. 126PL' L WHILE STILL PROVIDING A DRIVE AISLE 00000o aonnoo-----__--.-.onnoo 000000 L 000000 FOR EMERGENCY AND VEHICULAR N �l CIRCULATION,WHEN NEEDED. / � 0000^aK CLUBHOUSE POOL W.RAMBLIN ST. i PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/�RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE SITE PLANS/ CARPORT AND PARKING LOCATIONS SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" THE NUMBERS W.CHINDEN BLVD. PARKING STALL REQUIREMENTS -1.5 PER EACH ONE-BEDROOM UNIT -1 CARPORT PER ONE-BEDROOM UNIT -2 PER EACH TWO/THREE-BEDROOM UNIT I TFI_ M-F-7o [�� ,nEEWFT i -1 CARPORT PER TWO-BEDROOM UNIT -3 PER EACH THREE-BEDROOM UNIT °s _Fi -1 °= sy ,�noo ootroao , � o00000 as -1 CARPORT PER THREE-BEDROOM UNIT � I I I 1•5(72 UNITS) + 2 80) 3(60) 648 MF 24'LEFAM r �000� M°u,FaM M L,F ° �[00�0 M°°,EF L. STALLS REQ. GUEST STALLS = 32 CoMMERC�P.L -10%OF TOTAL UNITS BUILDING 648+32 = 680 TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQ. 692 TOTAL STALL PROVIDED -312 CARPORTS REQUIRED HUN BB2.4LLU I,XF M.LI a°° a° 00 1 -CARPORTS LOCATED IN GRAY AREAS _LTz_ IILLII °°°G° a°° a° a°° DIMENSION S m°L,F M°r M°°,E.F ° M°°,F�° M°°n.F ° -9'x19'STALLS w/26'-0"DRIVE AISLES jjoom] ooIloo— oonoo 0 0000 000000 —SIDEWALKS: 6'-0"WIDTH i ACCESSIBILITY � 4 -13 ADA STALLS (2% OF TOTAL, IBC) - - - - - - — -10 STANDARD ADA, 3 VAN ADA °°°P-K CLUBHOUSE POOL W.RAMBLIN ST. BICYCLE PARKING -1 BIKE STALL PER EVERY 25 VEHICLE PARKING STALLS PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. -25 BIKE PARKING STALLS (REQ'D) -52 BIKE STALLS (PROVIDED) -3 AT EACH BUILDING,4 AT CLUBHOUSE (INTERIOR) CO L E/�RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ON-SITE AMENITIES/ ON-SITE AMENITIES/ OVERALL SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" OVERALL AMENITIES W.CHINDEN BLVD. — - - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - - TOTAL AMENITIES REQUIRED:4 TOTAL AMENITIES PROVIDED: 9 CATEGORY ONE: I I I I I I TFFFFFFI I I I I ITMI I I L FFFFFFE:ll I I I I I LI I I luj, I I I I I I I I I I F7FFFT. "QUALITY OF LIFE" _ 99'-0" .0 99'0" 99'-0" 0 63'-0" 63'-0" 63'-0" 63'-0" 0 99.-0.. 99'-0" - o- 108'-0" y � 1.CLUBHOUSE 81'-0" N Lo 81'-B. * 81'-B. N Lo 81'-0" -� * -� 8' 1'0" N 81'-0" 81'-0" ry 8T-0" a l 2. FITNESS FACILITY, LOCATED INSIDE o ao----- ---- aff o0 CLUBHOUSE 3. DOG PARK WITH WASTE STATION CATEGORY TWO: "OPEN SPACE" 4.COMMUNITY GARDENS ADJACENT 5. PLAZAS COMMERCIAL BUILDING 6. PICNIC AREA INCLUDING TABLES, El BENCHES LANDSCAPING AND A 26-9 STRUCTURE FOR SHADE °°.� CATEGORYTHREE: 3 4 4 aL "RECREATION" s 7. POOL, LOCATED AT CLUBHOUSE 0 0 oa7-1 ouno oaa 00 &WALKING TRAILS ar-u^ 0 81.4. 81'-e„ L N 81'-0" 81'-0" 81'-0" 81'-0" 4 -� 4 CATEGORY FOUR: 99'-0" . a,'_0" a,,_o„ - 99._0, 99._6„ a,._e,. -�� ,Oa'_o• � W,_o„ = "MULTI—MODAL AMENITY STANDARDS" 9. BICYCLE REPAIR STATION, LOCATED I � IN CLUBHOUSE DOG CLUBHOUSE POOL I W.RAMBLIN ST. NOTE: DEFINITIONS ARE LAID OUT IN SECTION 11-3G-4:"STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. SITE AMENITIES", PER CITY CODE. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH — BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ON-SITE AMENITIES/ CLUBHOUSE SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" W.CHINDEN BLVD. _ CLUBHOUSE I INCLUDES: 99.-0. L0 99'0" 99•-0" 0 63'-0" 63'-0" I 63'-0" I 63'-0" 0 99.-0.. 9MI, o o- 108'-0" - 81'-°" 81'-9" 81'-9" o CATEGORY ONE: 4 N �o 81•_0" 3 i` -7 1` 8�Y 1,0„ 0 81�_0.� '� 81._0. 81._0�� * * o "QUALITY OF LIFE" o ao----- ---- Hff 00 CATEGORYTHREE: "RECREATION" -CATEGORY FOUR: _ "MULTI-MODAL AMENITY STANDARDS" REQUIREMENTS PER 11-4-3-27 _ ADJACENT -PROPERTY MANAGEMENT OFFICE COMMERCIAL BUILDING -MAINTENANCE STORAGE AREA -CENTRAL MAILBOX — 26'-°" -DIRECTORY MAP OF PROPERTY LOB] BPI ADDITIONAL AMENITIES AT CLUBHOUSE _ -OUTDOOR COMMUNITY POOL LOCATED 4 4 a 4 � ON EAST SIDE OF CLUBHOUSE. 0 00- ouno Ho 00° -FITNESS FACILITY LOCATED INSIDE 81._°,. s1._0„ 8141111._0. § CLUBHOUSE. 108'-0 � 99'-0" 81'-0" 81'-0" 9MI, 9MI, sr_0' � � L -OUTDOOR BBQ AREA AND FIRE PITS LOCATED NEAR POOL AREA. CLUBHOUSE EPOOL W.RAMBLINST. -BICYCLE REPAIR STATION LOCATED IN CLUBHOUSE. PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ON-SITE AMENITIES/ WALKING TRAILS SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" WALKING TRAILS W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - - - - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - — - - INCLUDES: rl —CATEGORYTHREE: --- "RECREATION" 17CONCEPT �.-0. �0 99.0.1 99•0" 0 63'-0.' 63'-0" 6T-0.' 63'-0" 0 99.-0.. 99•0" - -o- 108'-0" 4 4 �--T o 8,'°° —MULTIPLE PATHWAYS INTERCONNECTED N Lo 81'-0" * 81'-0" Z. Lo 81'-0" * 61'-0" N o 81'-0" 81'-0" N o 81'-9" �L THROUGHOUTTHE SITETHATVARIATE o ao----- ---- aff o0 CONSISTENTLY AS THE USER WALKS THROUGH THE SITE. THE LENGTH OF TRAVEL CAN BE ALTERED BASED ON HOW FAR THE USER WANTS TO �pOppp pppp EXPLORE THE SITE.THEY CAN BE SHORT ADJACENT WALKS WITHIN A PATICULAR BLOCK COMMERCIAL BUILDING OF THE SITE,OR THEY CAN MEANDER -8. - THROUGHOUTTHE ENTIRE SITE. 'pppppp _ > �pppp ppppp p�pp —WALKWAYS ARE LEVEL BUT APPEAR ELEVATED ATTHE ASPHALT DRIVE AISLES TO ACT IN FAVOR FOR PEDESTRIAN s SAFTEY,WHILE ALLOWING VEHICULAR o m m m 0 oa-__ --_--ouno Louoaa CIRCULATION,WHEN NEEDED. Hill IIIIII 71111111 81'-O" 81.4. 4 6" B" ; B 81-0" THE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE NORTH 99, . r 81,_°„ 81,_9„ T 99._°„ 61.-6,. 108'-O" 99,_°„ 1.-0. OF THE SITE TIE INTO THE PEDESTRIAN 1 U iiiiiiiiii F7FFFT. PATHWAY REQUIRED FOR THE SITE. CLUBHOUSE POOL i W.RAMBLIN ST. —STRONG, CONTINOUS PATHS ARE CARRIED — — — - — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - — — — — — - — — — — — — - — — — — — THROUGH IN BOTH NORTH—SOUTH AND EAST—WEST DIRECTIONS. PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/A RICH I T ECTS CBH — BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ON-SITE AMENITIES/ COMMUNITY GARDEN SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" COMMUNITY GARDENS W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - - - INCLUDES: -CATEGORY TWO: "OPEN SPACE" -0.1 99�MWo 6T 63'-0• 6T 63'-0• o o ,08� CONCEPT 0 0 0 8r 81.4. * 8r 81 ; * 8r 0 8r -LOCATED ON THE SOUTH WALLS, a o STEPPED BACK FAR FROM OTHER " o ao- atra oo BUILDING MASSINGSTO ALLOW OPTIMUM SOLAR GAIN. -ONE COMMUNITY GARDEN SPACE PROVIDED PER DWELLING BLOCK ON pppppp pppp THE SITE. f - - ADJACENT COMMERCIAL BUILDING -PLANTER BOXES WITHIN A WALKABLE PATHWAY.OPPORTUNITY 28-0 ze._0° FOR BENCHES AND TABLES TO BE pppp pppppp p pppp ppppp PROVIDED AS A PROMINENT PLACE TO READ A BOOK WITH A CUP OF COFFEE 0 0 4 4. a - - IN THE EARLY MORNING OR EVENING. o 0 u0o aoo 81 81,_0„ 8r-01, 81,_0„ 8r-0^ 8r-0" 81,0• 4 9 �� 99'-0• N 81-4- 81-4- 99•0° 99•0° s,-0.• ,08�-0 ss-o° ss-o POOL CLUBHOUSE W.RAMBLIN ST. PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ON-SITE AMENITIES/ PICNIC AREAS SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" PICNIC AREAS W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - - - INCLUDES: -CATEGORY TWO: "OPEN SPACE" -0.1 99�MWo a3 a3'-0• 6T 63'-0• s0-0.. nATTss•-0° o ,oa�-o• CONCEPT 0 0 0 44 E1.-0.. � 81.4. * ar E11-01, ; * ar ar ar-0• ar -LOCATED OFFTHE COMMUNITY a o PLAZAS THAT LAY ALONG THE " a ao- atra oa PROMENADES OF THE MULTIFAMILY _ STRUCTURES AND ADJACENTTO THE COMMUNITY GARDENS, IN MOST AREAS,TO ALLOW A FREE-FLOWING OUTDOOR COMMUNITY SPACE THROUGHOUTTHE SITE. f - - ADJACENT COMMERCIAL 4 4 BUILDING -THESE AREAS TOINCLUDETABLES, El BENCHES, LANDSCAPING AND A J2.-0STRUCTURE FOR SHADE. za._0„ �0 F77 LIU I r__1 =1 Es o -ouno oa aao 81 ar-o.. ar-o^ ar-o° ar-0^ ar-o° er o 4 9 � ss'-o• N ar_o° ar-o° ss._o° ss•-a" ioa'-o• ss.-o• _ CLUBHOUSE POOL� W.RAMBLIN ST. PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ON-SITE AMENITIES/ PLAZA COURTYARDS SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" PLAZA W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - - - INCLUDES: -CATEGORY TWO: "OPEN SPACE" o �'-0" es'-0" es'-0" eI`0" 0 99'_U" o 108'-0" CONCEPT 0 0 0 -0.. Z. 8,'-0" * 8,'-0" 81•-0.. ; * e,-O" 8,'-0" e,-O" 8,-0" -LOCATED IN THE ELONGATED a NORTH-SOUTH PROMENADES OF THE " o ao- Mgoo MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURES. _ - - o 90 0 -CONNECTS THE CORRIDORS AND MAIN PATHS OF TRAVEL,ACTING AS A COMMUNAL NODE WITHIN THE SITE. pppppp pppp COMMERCIAL ADJACENT T -MINIMUM 20'-0"IN ALL DIRECTIONS. 4 4 _ BUILDING -ACCESSED ON ALL SIDES. UOINCLUDES HARDSCAPING, SEATING ze._9° pppppp p pppp ppppp AND LIGHTING AND APPLICABLE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. 4 4 4 4 a E= L 1 o oo----- --_--ouno 00 III I i III 81'-0" 81.-0.. \ 81'-0" ,._0•. 81•_01, I 8T_0" `' 81'-0" 99'-0" N 81'-0" 81'-0" N 99'-0" 99'-0" 81'-0" 108'-0" ry 99'-0" 99'-0" CLUBHOUSE POOL W.RAMBLIN ST. PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE ON-SITE AMENITIES/ DOG PARK SCALE: 1"= 100'-0" DOG PARK W.CHINDEN BLVD. - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - - - - INCLUDES: -CATEGORY ONE: "QUALITY OF LIFE" o as as-0 aa�-o" as•-0• o o ,oa-o"111 CONCEPT 0 0 0 ar Z. ar * 61-0.. E1•-0.. ; * s, a,�_0•� e, a, -LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH OF a I ill I I I IIN I I ill I I ill I I IIII I I o THE PROPERTY,OFFSET FROM ANY " a ao- atra oa MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURES FOR NOISE. _ ACCESSIBLE DIRECTLY FROM PATHWAY ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AS WELL AS FROM THE SITE, INTERNALLY. pppppp DOG PARKTO INCLUDE: C M'MER�T -BAGS FOR DOG WASTE DISPOSAL. BUILDING -DOUBLE ENTRANCE GATE. 4 4 4 4 -BENCHES AND FENCING TO ENCLOSE za._o° za-o A MINIMUM OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET UE� pppp ri pppppp p pppp ppppp AND SECURED OPEN SPACE FOR AN OFF-LEASH DOG PARK. 4 4 ull _ I _ 4 41 a s THE OPEN SPACE CAN COUNT I o -__-�--_--oun oa aao TOWARD ANY REQUIRED OPEN SPACE, moo_ o PER SECTION 11-3G-4.C.9. 81 81 ar-0° ar-o° er-o° ar-0" er 0" 4 9 �� ss'-o• N ar_o° 81-4- � ss._o° ss•-a" -o�a,• • ,oa'-o• ss'-o" I I I IiLLL I I I I I I � � I DOG PARK CLUBHOUSE POOL W.RAMBLIN ST. PROPERTY SETBACK W.RAMBLIN ST. CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE AMENITY PRECEDENTS/ AMENITY PRECEDENTS/ CLUBHOUSE rr�� ■ k I 1 - � dim TV won y 115 co SIGI s �I s L, 1ST Ft U E. - CO L E/�RC H I T ECTS CBH — BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE kx a _ lip � � : �1�• -�*` �j7'� �{'e WF1MM§jpML All njwill eecl Pat Vk- c 71 11 o , 01 PC z -. f..�� vt'"""v' R 'fir. �"� � � »•_ !x� �q,°�• r:' � 'y �` « ��� :raj �v� � 1� - .� F�° f•�( .i .. �µ�.5 -. _ erg'.-� �.i„1 ,�' _y; .� �� j �- f7.'F.'.3� � • � f .• � 4 rryl _ � *i '°' € s���f,, ti •yam„ .�1r� �� *� � -i�jS,-' ��� ._ ti' ��. ✓a� �.,� ` ����Via""::�,f?o���.��� ,, _ `r • • � � 1 , y 1 1 �yi, �{ y -tv..- 4- .. ,{� L f1� 4 � � - .1..- �� �� R fF'� � P` •�* y ��f,'.� �G._k'.'1 tF''k� :.ram .9Yd. -��.'1. 'a M1,.1"-.1..� �".t .l�i .�La�` 1'.f��'.- h J 1��45�"4-�_'�•� Nw F } i - , r FL r f7 i4`�'--:��`' � � - ',}'s ��' �. . -:cam '•� _.ti_„ � dw k i�,1}•y aii�;�iY- � A -; r.#J ' ", I nuU' I I DAllq°i' -r __"_--�__" +,��__ .� "ti `/. _ ✓'- Al 7._ it � � "' +p!� 7 Y "�• �' fIL Ito �.A I a_ NN *•r=�r _. _ Y�,.Y'S'f`;y�.R�?�`4'.• ,r ��:.v^ �,>.� :#� •,�`kr�},� rl �' '�jl� � � ICI :':�.. `�,., '' -,,•��8� .� � '' ��- i k S�y1-�-• f /- - rS . �. lam. ; '} 5 i' t� �7 7y� I �" - :R '.F'_Y, 'a�' '�• ' { i y 'i1C5� '�' �' �• [ •ir 77ffJJ Y ti -Wr Y *' Ap knew 00 �++ h � }ice �' # �}, ' y •a ...... _ _ f�'+•ram l.{ � 9 A • • , • 1mlk 1 mlkAlk Amalk I A Y AF 1 - k; M ' 14 .4..•t 1, IIII IIIII�II�IIIII�IIIr'ryIIII II P�' ". .� y ]L�q..`7' q,, { IIIIII' i I� I' �f ..il �� I IT�� x Af'i}��rf• S';.r.- _ A•}: i, ,+� - � � � �� � ' Ilia �������1�� � �,I� �� �� , I a � - ::�_�.�+� ; �� . . . � ti �. �•t � �� f a , , i" "' 51� � h' .,r� cw'�-�lill'. 3 i ,:.....- P� - '� a�...�k � �" .. I J� � � r•+ �u M1�I? .r�r' -� r- tea. �': � .. ,r« I� � � _'}' ' �•ti -r ._ � ' Nil _ - ' ,� r"V }ix `� r .y r '� a. `fix' t 'I�'r 's M I - F �' •+ r i'' SO _ kiL, ' � ,`5'•'1 � � �� ` � f. �� � '+� =�wgg� i�ll�) �� III � IIII € r- � Imo°: ;. -. `� �- - f :s�;, �, •to \ �a���ill II I o � IIIUI ,^=a'"�' w1� M I I m �k I F � � s l I� _• .. u,... I � ���f Ali L�l i �{ :'� �� r'4} l _ ,.�- - •• �E 4wTr —.F : ,.ice,. �. + kase■r; :rl1 SMA �� �� ..- � I * .P •`r'. ti ua�.�1��f�����j�1�1��� ems+. � .�r, f�IsN�1 DOG r 15 LBS.GR LESSJUL Af AFiFR YRUR D06 +, _•j� '�}f ���CCC � ` 1 ��JJ f ; ''� gl��}i�li; � „iifr�:l M� •.e s '' •r•j;t;,' � ti� {_r_ � +• . 7' I�fipl`..Jff � r ^!Ff' ! „�, P r l :f - ry r?-�. ems, }'�j� ��•,Y 4-' CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ VIEW FROM NORTH NEIGHBORS 14W 4! i µ c tit _ a - CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ VI EW WESTBOU N D r r 'far'",' �"� � i►�"-� r 71W s ol -Y y T19 CO L E/�RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ VIEW EASTBOUND J _ OEM Yr. f TVs. • r I CO L E/�RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE -� y .ram K .. r .�'" {- ,+�. � � �• • - Y„ .,A� d iiii{lui�iiiiiiiii�!!!......�rtllG!!l•.,,I:IIl1 IlllIIIIII�Llruliii���=���! 1111lII�� Ju�l��f�I I �I�� �I�II� IAA II�II (III S• -�kt "'lll' IIIIIIIRIIIIalllj�llllllg �llll J( lillll i I �.. , i PACKAGECOLE/A RCH I TECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT • rah � 5� - . - -..1 } % ...fir ' _' + .�._*. `r�r X �•„� x Yf� ^r_.'-# ; 110 Ir A AV 44. '."x' ...yam �� p� ..r "' ° .�%�.,�°S - �'`.• .. - �S rG''x?x - ,P■.. '��RY-��A n t,�,e;, � R:..y. r� rf.nv':. - F �. 4, ar -�:��R r'�'s .yt.�. • - ". ',fib �, ..x. �;,g;:�' '�' - - • - f.yYz' � - ��� ;�; :.� .sates r§ 1 - ti. - _.'a• a'�x�Y.� �5��, PAP - - - ram".. �iir'" 4�':�yr?c+e ��� y-yif _�..� .:.� . '�. :�:�' � �w� r fip= •��. „ {�z ��_ �' III ■j II�� �I 11� I!!E III l� 1141i �l�lll�llllllli%ills �fll, .��gi ��� ..�, �i�� ! , - -- Tll� �II1 — -- — _ ■ ■■■■ ■ Y ..._.. r rrr r n; .: -- _ __ -- � -- --- ..i■■■ � _tt r< 1 it! 1 C P' ! i' '!fbll��11ll11��kII11II�E: ..... I Ikrli � �i� Plf.il���l�!llkklll klllklkiii.� ! Now 5' Ile +IC - r; F _ _ t4•�P. r r. f CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ VIEW THROUGH PLAZA pw - goo��= '- - � �� _ .. - _�' � 15 * �� r•fi .����,�.a. _ � ate` '�.f� ��. ''+�,�- x: ,�i�a COLE/�RCHITECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE Alk do { ,.# iA ,c: • �" !tip �? ,.` L4►r•- �, +L�� - ��-. r' - IV to ;,� _ �..�- .,y�y--�c2-'• _. �1C°""gr, �F��'i-. a;� •fir 'ti Y: ;.a ..S`,� �'.�'� •'.� - ;�Y ^+ - - ��," -:. - r - Aow - yq_��l i��y. .r�': ',�' ' :'f�� �: fir' - P, _LY� • i _ y. �qy�,,� .{�, - _��' �' �- .fir*.`.� r•4 j�. •g� - � � * - 1 'mL 1 Ap - t 4 .rrn MAM�.,l�•. ' : t.r, Kd r >c,'.=';a:,t ,F .. .fir.•, rk• '.I T � ���� 1.' '�.� ,.1;h`I�' 1 .j U;r-. .iy�,j/•''' {;�.L'..•,�^ '��?'� f:- WWTAMW INRLY k RL w` l, . - - i Al AI �. _ '.may. "�.�':`3 +'; �. .��..� y .•r. � 1- � .. ii H h Y . 1. �- 1' +� _ _ � e� �.Jar• , p ICE r' .q • ' - ' dL#'.t TA 4.k r i . . .AM- # i F ¢ AN .. y { 4 '� .�'+"•� i ai"� - r f1 �. l.Jlilli..i..�ii c � -� 1--. — �� 1 r ,_���...�. ' �`r � ,.:I.�..�_. :I � �'�I� .�..��� Il•.ii!lil. I;:-:,I11"` " -�'ni I il= ;.( 'Ir�: -- 5'r i i �.- -- — �.� � �- J ';j� I III li I ti Ab- COLE/A RCH I TECTS . . PACKAGE CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ SOUTH ENTRY CLUBHOUSE Tr r .( ti r . COLE/A • C13H BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE CONCEPT PF i f — S , t i j -ii •-• ._.�:- 1�������� r....i:.... rill+I H.. COLE/A RCH I TECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE Tea � d`��: � f`� � I ■ s i� r S� •r--+ar a�y ram- � � �y T.f�/ k. ��ff/bra�• Y w� y� • - ,�� - - -f.r _ .•_ _ `� CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ NORTHWEST APPROACH TO CLUBHOUSE -19 loo - " - 1 PO—N-- COLE/A • C13H - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE I r 4 � I COLE/A • . BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR Ir Ir�l I� CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE •+$7?,.si' �. ._+fir +*� ,��'., '� ' i+'.4 + . • - ter• 'r Y IL lot— { h Air- �r •�ij, lb- Nt' M. ripp"I � F mot + T: ru5• ' 1 - - Y ��•'k - '. ri 1. .,'i� �.'�'f`�."-. _ COLE/�RCHITECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES/ EXPOSED STAIRWELL INTERIOR r H t i CO L E/A RC H I T ECTS CBH - BLAYDEN I ENTITLEMENT PACKAGE THANKYOU/ THANK YOU ApprovalAnnexation, Zoning, Preliminary Plat, & CUP Blayden V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 24-2062: An Ordinance Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-1-8, Concerning Preservation of Private Property Rights; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-1A-1, Concerning Adding New Definitions; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-2, Table 11-2A-2, Concerning Manufactured Homes Within a Residential District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-4, Table 11-2A-4, Concerning Dimensional Standards for the R-2 District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2A-5, Table 11-2A-5, Concerning Dimensional Standards for the R-4 District; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-213-2, Table 11-213-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Commercial Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2C-2, Table 11-2C-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Industrial Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-2D-2, Table 11-2D-2, Concerning Allowed Uses in Traditional Neighborhood Districts; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-3C-6, Table 11-3C-6, Concerning Dimensional Standards for Carports for Residential Use; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3- 9, Concerning Daycare Facilities; Adding Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-51, Concerning Food Truck Court Specific Use Standards; Adding Unified Development Code Section 11-4-3-52, Concerning Food Truck Specific Use Standards; Amending Unified Development Code Section 11-5A-6(D)(4), Concerning Proof of Posting; and Providing an effective date. CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2062 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER,LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-1-8, CONCERNING PRESERVATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-1A-1, CONCERNING ADDING NEW DEFINITIONS; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-2A-2, TABLE 11-2A-2, CONCERNING MANUFACTURED HOMES WITHIN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-2A-4, TABLE 11-2A-4, CONCERNING DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-2 DISTRICT; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-2A-5, TABLE 11-2A-5, CONCERNING DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-4 DISTRICT; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-2B-2, TABLE 11-2B-2, CONCERNING ALLOWED USES IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-2C-2, TABLE 11-2C-2, CONCERNING ALLOWED USES IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-2D-2, TABLE 11-2D-2, CONCERNING ALLOWED USES IN TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICTS; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-3C-6, TABLE 11-3C-6, CONCERNING DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR CARPORTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-4-3-9, CONCERNING DAYCARE FACILITIES; ADDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-4-3-51, CONCERNING FOOD TRUCK COURT SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS; ADDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11- 4-3-52, CONCERNING FOOD TRUCK SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS; AMENDING UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11-5A-6(D)(4), CONCERNING PROOF OF POSTING; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Unified Development Code is the official zoning ordinance for the City of Meridian and provides an opportunity to better support the Comprehensive Plan and provide a tool that is relevant and contemporary to the needs of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Meridian deems it to be in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of its citizens to incorporate changes to the Unified Development Code. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO: Section 1. That Unified Development Code section 11-1-8 be amended as follows: 11-1-8. - Preservation of private property rights. A. This title shall be interpreted to equally protect citizens from the undue encroachment on their private property by their neighbors'uses of their private property and equally protect each citizen's right to use of their property without creating undue burden upon their neighbors. OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 1 OF 18 B. in the administr-ation of this title, evefy per-son shall be secuft in their-. . 1, —d fie employee of the Gity shall enter-"on, 4westigate, or- sear-eh any of the premises of any eitizen without the eonsent of such eitizen or-order-issued by a eotut of proper-jtir-isdie by their agent before the Council in the pFopeF eFder of business to appeal a deeisiont. pert to the pr-oee"r-eseont[it ed in ehapter- , "administration", oft Y1TC�i+I D. in the enfomement of this title, it shall be deemed to apply equally to each eitizen eaeh property in similar-eir-eumstanees, and shall not be enfor-eed to diser-ifninate between Section 2. That Unified Development Code section 11-1A-1 be amended as follows: Add the following new definition: Bedroom. A bedroom is a room used for sleeping that has a floor area of not less than seventy(70) square feet, not less than seven(7) feet in ceiling height,provides one means of egress and a closet as defined by the currently adopted international residential code. Add the following new definition: Food truck court. Food truck court is an area that consists of two (2) or more food trucks on aapermanent site with designated stalls. Add the following new definition: Food truck. A commercial or retail establishment or enterprise that operates from a readily movable wheeled or towed vehicle or cart; and from which the operator stores, prepares, sells, displays, serves, or offers for sale or iveaway, food and/or beverages, which remains in any three hundred(300)square foot area for more than two (2) consecutive hours within an.. try-four-hour period. OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 2 OF 18 Section 3. That Unified Development Code section 11-2A-2, Table 11-2A-2 (including the accompanying notes), be amended as follows: TABLE 11-2A-2 ALLOWED USES IN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 R-40 Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, - - C C C outdoors' Cemetery' - C C C C Church or place of religious worship' - - C C C Civic, social or fraternal organizations' - - C C C Daycare Center' - C C P P Daycare, family' A A A A C Daycare, group' - C C P P Direct sales' A A A A A Dwelling, secondary' A A A A A Dwelling, single-family attached - C P P P Dwelling, single-family detached P P P P A/C Dwelling,townhouse - C P P C Dwelling,two-family - C P P C duplex Education institution, private' - C C C C OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE—ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 3 OF 18 Use R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 R-40 Education institution, - C C P/C P/C public' Home,manufactured or mobile subdivision - - C C C Home occupation, accessory use' A A A A A Laundromat' - - - A A/C Live/work residential project' - - - C C Manufactured home - - - C - park Manufactured homes P P P P A/C outside of manufactured home parks'. Multifamily - - - C C development',' Nursing or residential - - C C C care facility' Parking facility - - - - C Parks,public and private P P P P P Personal service - - - - A Professional service - - - - A Public,infrastructure C C C C C Public or quasi-public - - C C C use' Public utility,minor P P P P P Recreational vehicle - - - - C park OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 4 OF 18 Use R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 R-40 Restaurant' - - - - A Self-service storage - - - C C facility,residential' Storage facility, outside' A A A A A Storage facility, self- A A A A A service' Vertically integrated - - - C C residential project' Wireless communication P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C facility' Wireless communication A/C A/C A/C A/C A/C facility, amateur radio antenna' Notes: I- Indicates uses that are subject to specific use standards in accord with chapter 4 of this title. 2.Multifamily dwellings may be allowed in the R-4 and R-8 Land Use Districts when included in a planned unit development(PUD). 3.Subject to the home occupation, accessory use standards set forth in section 11-4-3-21 of this title. 4. A manufactured home located outside of a manufactured home park shall be subject to the standards and requirements set forth in this title for single-family detached dwellings. Section 4. That Unified Development Code section 11-2A-4, Table 11-2A-4, be amended as follows: TABLE 11-2A-4 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-2 DISTRICT R-2 Standard Requirement Minimum property size/dwelling unit(in square feet) 12,000 Minimum street frontage(in feet) 80 Rear setback(in feet) 15 Interior side setback(in feet) 7.5/story OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE—ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 5 OF 18 R-2 Standard Requirement Street setback' (in feet) Local 20 Collector 25 Street landscape buffer'(in feet) Collector 20 Arterial 25 Entryway corridor 35 Interstate 50 Maximum building height(in feet) 35 Minimum living afea(in s"afe feet) 11-500 Minimum ground floof area for-multi story units (in squai-7e feet) "o Section 5. That Unified Development Code section 11-2A-5, Table 11-2A-5,be amended as follows: TABLE 11-2A-5 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-4 DISTRICT R-4 Standard Requirement Minimum property size/dwelling unit(in square feet) 8,000 Minimum street frontage(in feet) 60 Rear setback(in feet) 15 Interior side setback(in feet) 5 Street setback' to front loaded garage(in feet): Local 20 Collector 25 OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE—ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 6 OF 18 R-4 Standard Requirement Street setback' to living area and/or side loaded garage(in feet): Local 15 Collector 25 Street landscape buffer'(in feet): Collector 20 Arterial 25 Entryway corridor 35 Interstate 50 Maximum building height(in feet) 35 Minimum living area(ift square feet): r`nctcaekea 4-4W Attaehe 8.00 Minimum gfound floof afea f6f multi stofy tinits (in square feet) 800 Section 6. That Unified Development Code section 11-2B-2, Table 11-2B-2, be amended as follows: TABLE 11-213-2 ALLOWED USES IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS Use C-N C-C C-G L-O M-E H-E Animal care facility' P P P C C - Artist studio' P P P - - - Arts, entertainment or P P P C - - recreation facility, indoor' Arts, entertainment or C P P - - - recreation facility, outdoor' Arts, entertainment or - C C - - - recreation facility, outdoor stage or music venue Building material, garden C P P - - - equipment and supplies' OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE—ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 7 OF 18 Use C-N C-C C-G L-O M-E H-E Cemetery' - - - C - - Church or place of P P P P C C religious worship' Civic, social or fraternal C C C C - - organizations' Conference center - - P - C P Daycare center' A/C A/C A/C P A/C A/C Daycare, family' A A A A - - Daycare, group' P P A P C C Dispatch center for C C P C C - mobile services' Drinking establishment' C C C - - C Drive-through A/C A/C A/C - - - establishment' Education institution, P P P P P P private' Education institution, P P P P P P public' Equipment rental, sales, - C C - -and service' Financial institution' P P P P P A Flex space' - P P - P - Food and beverage P/C P/C P/C - P/C P/C products processing; minor' Food truck court' P P P P P P Food truck' A A A A A A Fuel sales facility' C P P - - C OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 8 OF 18 Use C-N C-C C-G L-O M-E H-E Fuel sales facility, truck - - C - - - stop' Healthcare or social P P P P P P services Home occupation, A A - - - accessory usel Hospital' - C C C C P Hotel and motel' P/C P/C P/C - C P Indoor shooting range - - - - C - Industry, information' P P P C P P Industry, light' - - C C P C Laundromat' P P P C - - Laundry and dry cleaning P P P - - A Live/work residential P P C C -project' Mortuary C P P - - - Multifamily - C C - - - development' Nursery or urban farm' C P P C - - Nursing or residential C C C C - - care facility' Parking facility C C P C C P Parks,public and private P P P P P P Personal service P P P P A A Professional service P P P P P P Public, infrastructure' C C C C C C Public or quasi-public P P P P P P use' OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 9 OF 18 Use C-N C-C C-G L-O M-E H-E Public utility, minor P P P P P P Recreational vehicle park - - P - - - Research and - - P - P P development facility Restaurant' P P P C A A Retail sales P P P - A A Retail store P P P - A A Retail store, wine and P P P - - A beer sales and servings' Storage facility, outside' A A A - - - Storage facility, self- - C C - - - service' Vehicle repair, minor' A P P - - - Vehicle sales or rental - C P - - - and service' Vehicle washing facility' C P P - - A Vertically integrated C P P C - - residential project' Warehouse' - - A - A/C - Wholesale sales - - A - - - Wireless communication P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C facility' Wireless communication A/C A/C A/C A/C A/C A/C facility, amateur radio antenna' OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 10 OF 18 Section 7. That Unified Development Code section 11-2C-2, Table 11-2C-2,be amended as follows: TABLE 11-2C-2 ALLOWED USES IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Use I-L I-H Animal care facility' P - Artist studio' P P Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, indoors' C - Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, outdoor stage or music venue C - Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, outdoors' C - Building material, garden equipment and supplies' A A Cemetery' C - Church or place of religious worship' C C Contractor's yard' P P Daycare center' A - Daycare, group' A - Dispatch center for mobile services' P - Drive-through establishment' A - Dwelling, single-family detached A - Entertainment establishment, adult' C - Equipment rental, sales, and service' P P Financial institution' A - Flex space' P P Food and beverage products processing; major' P P Food and beverage products processing; minor P/C - Food truck court' P P Food truck' A A Fuel sales facility' A/C A/C Fuel sales facility,truck stop' C C Indoor shooting range' P C Industry,heavy' - P/C OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE—ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 11 OF 18 Industry,information' P - Industry, light' P P Laundry and dry cleaning P P Mortuary P - Nursery or urban farm' C - Parking facility P P Parks,public and private C C Personal service A - Professional service A - Public, infrastructure' P P Public or quasi-public use' C C Public utility,major' P P Public utility,minor P P Public utility,transmission lines P P Recreational vehicle park C - Recycling center' P/C P/C Restaurant' A A Retail store A A Solid waste transfer station C P/C Storage facility, outside' P P Storage facility, self-service' P P Terminal, freight or truck' P P Vehicle impound yard' P P Vehicle repair,major' P P Vehicle repair,minor' P P Vehicle sales or rental and service' P - Vehicle washing facility' A/C A Vehicle wrecking or junk yard' - P Warehouse' P P OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 12 OF 18 Wholesale sales P P Wireless communication facility' P/C P/C Wireless communication facility, amateur radio antenna' A/C A/C Section 8. That Unified Development Code section 11-2D-2, Table 11-2D-2, be amended as follows: TABLE 11-2D-2 ALLOWED USES IN THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICTS Use O-T TN-C TN-R Artist studio' P P - Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, indoors' P C - Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, outdoor stage or C C - music venue Arts, entertainment or recreation facility, outdoors' C C - Building material, garden equipment and supplies' C C - Church or place of religious worship' P P C Civic, social or fraternal organizations' P C C Conference center P - - Daycare center' C C C Daycare, family' A A A Daycare, group' P P C Drinking establishment' C C - Drive-through establishment C - - Dwelling, secondary' A A A Dwelling, single-family attached P P P Dwelling, single-family detached P C P Dwelling,townhouse P P P Dwelling,two-family duplex P C P OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE—ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 13 OF 18 Education institution,private' P C C Education institution,public' P P P/C Financial institution' P P C Food and beverage products processing; minor' P/C P/C - Food truck court' P P P Food truck' A A A Healthcare or social services P P - Home occupation, accessory use' A A A Hospital' C - - Hotel and motel' P/C C - Industry,information' P/C P/C - Industry,light' C - - Laundromat' P P A Laundry and dry cleaning P P P Live/work residential project' P P P Mortuary C C - Multifamily development' P P P Nursing or residential care facility' C C C Parking facility C C - Parks,public and private P P P Personal service P P C Professional service P P C Public,infrastructure' C C C Public or quasi-public use' P P C Public utility,minor C P P OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE—ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 14 OF 18 Restaurant' P P - Retail store P P - Retail store,wine and beer sales and servings' P P - Vehicle repair,minor' A - - Vertically integrated residential project' P P P Wireless communication facility' P/C P/C P/C Wireless communication facility, amateur radio antenna' A/C A/C A/C Section 9. That Unified Development Code section 11-3C-6, Table 11-3C-6, Note 1, be amended as follows: Notes: I The size of the garage required for dwelling units shall be measured by exterior dimensions and shall be at least ten(10) feet by twenty(20) feet for a one-space garage and 20 feet by 20 feet for a two-space garage. The minimum size of a carport that covers a parking stall shall be at least nine (9) feet by seventeen (17) feet. All other required parking shall meet the required stall and drive aisle dimensions in UDC Table 11-3C-5. Section 10. That Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-9 be amended as follows: A. General standards for all child daycare and adult care uses, including the classifications of daycare center; daycare, family; and daycare, group. 1. In determining the type of daycare facility, the total number of children at the facility at one time, including the operator's children, is the determining factor. 2. On-site vehicle„'parking and turnaround areas shall be provided to ensure safe discharge and pick up of clients. 3. The decision-making body shall specify the maximum number of allowable clients and hours of operation as conditions of approval. 4. The applicant or owner shall provide proof of criminal background checks and fire inspection certificates as required by Title 39, Chapter 11, Idaho Code. Said proof shall be provided prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. The applicant or owner shall comply with all State of Idaho and Department of Health and Welfare requirements for daycare facilities. 5. In residential districts or uses adjoining an adjacent residence, the hours of operation shall be between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. This standard may be modified through approval of a conditional use permit. 6. Prior to submittal of an application for an accessory daycare facility in a residential district, the applicant or owner shall hold a neighborhood meeting in accord with subsection OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 15 OF 18 11-5A-4.13 of this title. Notice of the neighborhood meeting shall be provided to all property owners of record within one hundred(100) feet of the exterior boundary of the subject property. Section 11. That Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-51 be added as follows: 11-4-3-51 - Food truck court A. If abutting a residential district, hours of operation shall be limited from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 P.M. B. Food trucks shall have a clean appearance at all times. C. The food truck operator shall obtain any and all applicable licenses, permits, certifications, and inspections from the Central District Health Department and the City of Meridian Fire Department prior to operating on the site. D. Each food truck must have access to all utilities necessar to operate the unit. E. The site must have permanent restrooms. Portable restrooms are prohibited. F. The site must have a designated indoor or outdoor seating G. Two (2)parking spaces shall be provided for each food truck. H. The property owner must provide trash receptacles and waste removal adjacent to each tenant. On site dumpsters shall be screened in accordance with section 11-3A- 12 of this title. I. Mobile structures, such as sheds, are prohibited. Section 12. That Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-52 be added as follows: 11-4-3-52—Food truck A. The site plan for the primary business shall include a defined food truck location. B. Hours of operation shall be limited to the hours of the primary business. C. The food truck shall maintain a clean appearance at all times and have exterior colors compatible with the primary business. D. The food truck operator shall obtain any and all applicable licenses, permits, certifications, and inspections from the Central District Health Department and the City of Meridian Fire Department prior to operating on the site. E. The food truck must have access to all utilities necessar to operate the unit. F. The food truck operator must have access to the public restroom facilities of the primary business. Portable restrooms are prohibited. G. The property owner must provide trash receptacles and waste removal for the operator. H. The food truck is prohibited in the required landscape buffers. I. The food truck shall not reduce the number of required off street parking spaces for the primary business. Section 13. That Unified Development Code section 11-5A-6(D)(4) be amended as follows: 4. Proof ofposting. A notar-ized statement certificate of sign posting, map depicting the location(s) of the sign(s) and a photographLss,)of the posting shall be provided to the city no later than seven(7) days prior to the public hearing a4tesfing-to certifying where and when OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 16 OF 18 the sign(s)were posted. Unless certificate is received by such date, the hearing will be continued. Section 14. That all other provisions of the Unified Development Code remain unchanged. Section 15. That this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 8th day of October, 2024. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 8th day of October, 2024. APPROVED: ATTEST: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Chris Johnson, City Clerk OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 17 OF 18 i CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho, hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete and upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. 1 William L.M. Na y SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2062 An ordinance amending Unified Development Code section 11-1-8, concerning preservation of private property rights; amending Unified Development Code section 11-1A-1, concerning adding new definitions; amending Unified Development Code section 11-2A-2, table 11-2A-2, concerning manufactured homes within a residential district; amending Unified Development Code section 11- 2A-4, table 11-2A-4, concerning dimensional standards for the R-2 district; amending Unified Development Code section 11-2A-5, table 11-2A-5, concerning dimensional standards for the R-4 district; amending Unified Development Code section 11-213-2, table 11-213-2, concerning allowed uses in commercial districts; amending Unified Development Code section 11-2C-2, table 11-2C-2, concerning allowed uses in industrial districts; amending Unified Development Code section 11-2D- 2, table 11-2D-2, concerning allowed uses in traditional neighborhood districts; amending Unified Development Code section 11-3C-6, table 11-3C-6, concerning dimensional standards for carports for residential use; amending Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-9, concerning daycare facilities; adding Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-51, concerning food truck court specific use standards; adding Unified Development Code section 11-4-3-52, concerning food truck specific use standards; amending Unified Development Code section 11-5a-6(D)(4), concerning proof of posting. This ordinance is effective upon publication. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian, 33 East Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho. OCTOBER 2024 UPDATE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISION ORDINANCE-ZOA 2024-0001 PAGE 18 OF 18 V IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Ordinance No. 24-2061: An Ordinance (Kilgore H-2023-0063) for rezone of a parcel of land located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Niday's Second Addition, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Plats at page 594, Ada County records, situate in the northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described in Exhibit "A," rezoning 0.34 acres of land from the R- 4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) zoning district to the 0-T (Old Town) zoning district in the Meridian City Code; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all applicable official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-056620 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=4 VICTORIA BAILEY 10/09/2024 10:12 AM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2061 BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK AN ORDINANCE (KILGORE H-2023-0063) FOR REZONE OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF NIDAY'S SECOND ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, FILED IN PLATS AT PAGE 594, ADA COUNTY RECORDS, SITUATE IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, CITY OF MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY,IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A," REZONING 0.34 ACRES OF LAND FROM THE R-4 (MEDIUM LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE O-T (OLD TOWN)ZONING DISTRICT IN THE MERIDIAN CITY CODE; DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO ALTER ALL APPLICABLE USE AND AREA MAPS AS WELL AS THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAPS AND ALL APPLICABLE OFFICIAL MAPS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES AND THE ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ADA COUNTY ASSESSOR, THE ADA COUNTY TREASURER, THE ADA COUNTY RECORDER, AND THE IDAHO STATE TAX COMMISSION, AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADA, STATE OF IDAHO: SECTION 1. That the property described in the Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit "A," which is incorporated herein by reference, is within the corporate limits of the City of Meridian, Idaho, and that the City of Meridian has received a written request for rezoning by Kilgore, LLC, the owner of said property. SECTION 2. That the above-described real property is hereby rezoned from the R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) zoning district to the O-T (Old Town) zoning district. SECTION 3. That City Staff is hereby directed to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all applicable official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance and its exhibits with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission within ten (10) days following the effective date of this ordinance. REZONE ORDINANCE-KILGORE H-2023-0063 PAGE I SECTION 5. That all ordinances, resolutions, orders or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 6.That this Ordinance, once passed, shall be in full force and effect upon publication, in accordance with law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 81 day of October, 2024. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO, this 8' day of October, 2024. MAYOR ROBERT E. SIMISON ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON, CITY CLERK STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) ss: County of Ada ) On this day of October, 2024, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT E.SIMISON and CHRIS JOHNSON known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,respectively,of the City of Meridian,Idaho,and who executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that the City of Meridian executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for Idaho My Commission Expires: REZONE ORDINANCE-KILGORE H-2023-0063 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A engineering e g Parcel Description Annexation Legal Description Residential to Commercial A portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Niday's Second Addition according to the official plat thereof filed in Plats at Page 594, Ada County Records, situate in the northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeast corner of Niday's Second Addition according to the official plat thereof filed in Plats at Page 594, Ada County Records. Thence along the southerly line of said Addition, North 89'50'00" West, 158.00 feet to the center line of an Alley in Block 1 of Niday's Second Addition according to the official plat thereof filed in Plats at Page 594, Ada County Records; Thence along said center line, North 00'00'00" East, 94.00 feet to a point of the prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 1, Block 1 of said Addition; Thence along said prolongation, South 89°50'00" East, 158.00 feet to a point of the prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 1, Block 1 of Niday's Second Addition according to the official plat thereof filed in Plats at Page 594, Ada County Records, and the easterly line of said Addition, and the northeast quarter of Section 12; Thence along the said line, South 00°00'00" East, 94.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 14,852 square feet or 0.341 acres, more or less. END OF DESCRIPTION. a� LA yy`ov E N Prepared by: I V Travis L. Krupp, PLS OC O Regional Survey Manager CL. 3 TLK:rk K�V 680 S. Progress Ave., Suite#26 • Meridian, Idaho 83642 • Tel: 208-342-7957 • Web: hmh-llc.com Equal Opportunity Employer EXHIBIT B 1 6 12 7 i 0 30 60 I I Scale in Feet \ Lot 2, Block 1 . 'o Parcel No. cq R6066010011 1s 8 S89°50'00"E 30, 158.00'+/- j- - -- Lot 1 , Block 1Parcel No. I ✓ / / / / / / / i, w + / / / / R6066010001,/ / / / / / / /� o Z ono + � o 0cc0 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /o� o0 z, aY o 158.00'+/- / / [ILI N89°50'00"W LA Na W. Carleton Ave. S Tf G?� SE Car. Niday's Second Add I Point of Beginning 7 0 3�Z3 Q REFERENCES: ,ff qE 0f \� �Q Subdivision: Niday's Second Addition q`IS L . This Exhibit was prepared from information of record only, no field survey was conducted. EXHIBIT "A„ HMH ANNEXATION SITE PLAN I engnee>ing SITUATE IN THE NE X OF SECTION 12, 680 S.Progress Avenue,Suite 26 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN, Meridian, ID83642 CITY of MERIDIAN, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO. 208 342-7957 CERTIFICATION OF SUMMARY: William L.M. Nary, City Attorney of the City of Meridian, Idaho,hereby certifies that the summary below is true and complete Ind upon its publication will provide adequate notice to the public. i r e i William L. M.Nary, City Attorney SUMMARY OF CITY OF MERIDIAN ORDINANCE NO. 24-2061 An Ordinance (Kilgore H-2023-0063) for rezone of a parcel of land located in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of Niday's Second Addition,according to the official plat thereof,filed in Plats at page 594,Ada County records, situate in the northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described in Exhibit"A,"rezoning 0.34 acres of land from the R-4 (Medium Low-Density Residential) zoning district to the O-T (Old Town) zoning district in the Meridian City Code; directing city staff to alter all applicable use and area maps as well as the official zoning maps and all applicable official maps depicting the boundaries and the zoning districts of the City of Meridian in accordance with this ordinance; providing that copies of this ordinance shall be filed with the Ada County Assessor, the Ada County Treasurer, the Ada County Recorder, and the Idaho State Tax Commission, as required by law; and providing an effective date. A full text of this ordinance is available for inspection at City Hall, City of Meridian,33 East Broadway Avenue,Meridian, Idaho.This ordinance shall be effective as of the date of publication of this summary. [Publication to include map as set forth in Exhibit B.] REZONE ORDINANCE-KILGORE H-2023-0063 PAGE 3