Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-09-24 Regular
City Council Regular Meeting City Council Chambers, 33 East Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 6:00 PM Minutes ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE PRESENT Councilman Doug Taylor Councilman John Overton Councilwoman Anne Little Roberts Councilman Brian Whitlock Councilman Luke Cavener Councilwoman Liz Strader ABSENT Mayor Robert E. Simison PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNITY INVOCATION ADOPTION OF AGENDA Adopted PUBLIC FORUM – Future Meeting Topics ACTION ITEMS 1. Parks & Recreation Department Director's Report on Transfer of Western Ada Recreation District Assets to the City of Meridian 2. Resolution 24-2474: Ratifying the Conveyance of Real and Personal Property from the Western Ada Recreation District; Accepting the Termination of the Western Ada Recreation District’s Lease of Lakeview Golf Course; and Providing an Effective Date Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Whitlock, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 3. Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property from Western Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian Approved Motion to approve made by Councilman Whitlock, Seconded by Councilwoman Strader. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilman Cavener, Councilwoman Strader 4. Public Hearing continued from September 17, 2024 for District at Ten Mile (H- 2023-0071) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located at the northwest corner of S. Ten Mile Rd. and I-84 Approved Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2023-0071 A. Request: Future Land Use Map Amendment to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan to change the designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent properties, resulting in a net change in the area as follows: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) (+9.26 acres), High Density Residential (HDR) (+2.66 acres), Mixed-Use Residential (MU-R) (- 10.61 acres), Mixed-Use Commercial (MU-C) (+0.32 acre), Mixed Employment (ME) (-0.22 acre) and High Density Employment (HDE) (-1.40 acres) as requested by the Applicant and as recommended by Staff on adjacent properties if the Applicant's request is approved. B. Request: Modified Development Agreements to the existing Development Agreements (Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) Inst .#2022-049799, Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073618, SJJV LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073617, Janicek Properties LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073616, to consolidate them into one (1) new agreement, which will replace the previous agreements (or a portion thereof, as applicable) and include a conceptual development plan for the overall area. C. Request: Rezone of 7.48 acres of land from the C-C to the TN-C district, 12.96 acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district, 9.13 acres from the C-C to the H-E district, 25.97 acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district, and 1.37 acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district. D. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 38 building lost and one (1) common lot on 108.77 acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G, H-E and M-E zoning districts. Motion to approve made by Councilman Taylor, Seconded by Councilman Overton. Voting Yea: Councilman Taylor, Councilman Overton, Councilwoman Little Roberts, Councilman Whitlock, Councilwoman Strader Voting Nay: Councilman Cavener FUTURE MEETING TOPICS ADJOURNMENT 9:22 PM Meridian City Council September 24, 2024. A Meeting of the Meridian City Council was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 24, 2024, by Mayor Robert Simison. Members Present: Luke Cavener, Liz Strader, John Overton, Doug Taylor, Anne Little Roberts and Brian Whitlock. Members Absent: Robert Simison. Other Present: Chris Johnson, Bill Nary, Bill Parsons, Steve Siddoway, Brian Caldwell, Kris Blume and Dean Willis. ROLL-CALL ATTENDANCE X Liz Strader X Brian Whitlock Anne Little Roberts _X_ John Overton _X_ Doug Taylor _X_Luke Cavener Mayor Robert E. Simison Cavener: Okay. Council, it is Tuesday, September 24th at 6:00 p.m. The time noticed for our regular City Council meeting. Begin tonight's meeting with roll call attendance. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cavener: Great. Everyone is present, ready for business. We will move on to our next item on the agenda, which is the Pledge of Allegiance. So, join me in the pledge. (Pledge of Allegiance recited.) COMMUNITY INVOCATION Cavener: The next item on our agenda is the community vacation. We are joined this evening by Nick Armstrong. Nick, welcome. We would like to ask everyone in the audience to join us in a moment of prayer or take this as an opportunity for silent reflection -- reflection. Nick, thanks for being here. We will turn the time over to you. Armstrong: Father, thank you. You are Lord of heaven and earth and holy and we just -- you have given us dominion over all of this and we pray for wisdom for our Mayor, for our Council, for our department heads as they administer the well-being of the city, requests of use of land and just that we would be continued to be that place that's a light on the hill, that we would hold up your name and I pray, too, as we come on elections and they are so contentious. So, many issues that many of us don't agree on that we could find a place for reasonable discussion and that we continue to enjoy our freedom to vote and to decide how we will run the city, the state and this country, in Jesus' name, amen. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 2 of 56 ADOPTION OF AGENDA Cavener: Thanks, Nick. All right. Council, next item on the agenda is the adoption of the agenda. Do I have a motion? Strader: Mr. Council President -- Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: -- move that we adopt the agenda as published. Overton: Second. Cavener: It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? Mr. Johnson, please, call roll. Roll Call: Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Cavener: All ayes and the adoption is agenda — agenda is adopted. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. PUBLIC FORUM — Future Meeting Topics Simison: Next item on the agenda is public forum. Mr. Johnson, has anyone signed up to provide any testimony this evening? Johnson: Mr. President, nobody has signed up. ACTION ITEMS 1. Parks & Recreation Department Director's Report on Transfer of Western Ada Recreation District Assets to the City of Meridian Cavener: Okay. Nobody on the public forum, so we will move to our Action Items. Action Item No. 1, Parks and Recreation Department director report of a transfer of Western Ada Recreation District assets to the City of Meridian. Director Siddoway, we will turn the time over to you. Good evening. Siddoway: Thank you, President Cavener, Members of the City Council. It's my pleasure to be before you tonight. We are here tonight to complete the transfer of the remaining assets from the Western Ada Recreation District or WARD. We have been in front of you several times over the last couple of years, most recently for formal action back in April when we brought forward the agreement that kind of laid out all of the — the next steps through the summer that we have been following with -- with legal and -- and Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 3 of 56 with WARD. I want to take a moment just to recognize Emily Kane, who is -- should be online tonight, as well as Shaun Wardle, president of the Western Ada Recreation District Board and all -- all the -- the board members that have been part of making this happen. Previous actions that this Council has taken had us taking over the operations and maintenance of the pool, the golf course, maintenance of the little park on Tammy Street, notice of Settlers Village Park. Tonight those assets formally transfer to -- or are approved to transfer. Our closing date -- our agreed upon closing date for all of the agreements will be September 30th, in about a week, so everything is lined up for that. If approved the -- the -- the agreements that are on your agenda tonight will convey the Meridian community swimming pool, which is -- feels like it's in Storey Park, but it's actually on its own little piece of property. The Settlers Village neighborhood park, which we call Tammy Street Park, because we already have a Settlers Park, but Settlers Village is the name of the subdivision that that parcel is in. It also transfers the leasehold of the Lakeview Golf Course. The city already owns and has owned the -- the golf course land itself, but the -- the Western Ada Recreation District purchased the -- he leasehold on the operations and, then, we have been operating it for the last couple of years and, then, finally, all the personal property associated with those locations and facilities. As per the April 2nd memorandum that was approved by the Council and the WARD board, the -- WARD will be entitled to a consider -- consideration in the amount of one dollar and finance is all queued up and ready. We have received the invoice for that. So, that -- that's ready to transfer on the 30th, which is our -- our closing date. For the record legal notices for this meeting were published as required by law on September 10th and September 17th. So, our requested actions tonight are the next items on your agenda, which are Resolution 24-2474 and it is -- and, then, after that the agreement for transfer of the personal property. With that I would like to turn some time over to Shaun Wardle, president of the Western Ada Recreation District, to make a few comments and I would like to close my remarks by just expressing my -- not only my appreciation, but our commitment to these assets. They have been kind of a treasure for the community over -- over the last several decades and we have kind of -- as the department outgrown the offerings of Parks and Recreation for the city and we will take these under our wing and look forward to serving our citizens with them into the future. So, Shaun. Cavener: Director Siddoway. Mr. Wardle, good evening. S.Wardle: Thank you, Steve. I appreciate that. Members of the Council, getting a pretty good deal for a dollar here. So, Shaun Wardle, the chairman of the -- the Western Ada Recreation District. I would like to take just a moment of time to tell a little story about the community and -- and -- and what Western Ada Rec is, because a lot of people don't really know and -- and may have even contacted you about these transactions. So, I will just get on the record real quick. I know you have got a busy meeting tonight. I'm here on behalf of our current board, which is comprised of Colin Moss and Tyler Rountree. So, in the 1970s the community wanted to create an asset, but the city was very small back then. Several thousand people. And so levying a — a levy on that community really wouldn't have created the tax revenue needed to -- to build the asset and the asset was the -- the community pool and community pool was Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 4 of 56 requested for recreation purposes, but also for water safety. Here in Idaho we live in a place with canals and rivers and -- and lakes and so I can tell you that once that community pool was built we have done more swim lessons in this state -- level one and level two swim lessons than -- than anyone else in the state of Idaho and -- and the Parks Department's taken that on and so we really feel strongly about that mission. So, the district was created 50 years ago. The pool was built and it -- essentially the area of impact was used as the Western Ada Recreation District boundary and the city, as we know, has really grown into that and so we really feel it's an appropriate time. Western Ada Rec has kind of served its purpose for where we are at. I'm going to mention a couple names. Walt Casey, Gary Smith, Walt Morrow, Jim Johnson, Charlie Rountree and Heath Van Patten are all former commissioners of the Western Ada Recreation District. You will -- you will hear a lot of city names there that many people think of as founding fathers for -- for the local recent City of Meridian and I would like to -- to say thank you to them, because they really did something that -- that was -- that was thoughtful, especially while I was a kid. Not just providing me a spot to be able to recreate, but they saved a lot of money. So, when we were tasked with rebuilding the community pool -- so, the community pool was built -- and as cosmopolitan as we possibly could. It was a cinder block building with a couple showers, but it did have a high dive and that's where I learned how to swim and so it served its purpose for a number of years, but needed to be rebuilt. Western Ada Rec was able to do that out of cash reserve and so we rebuilt the existing facility out of cash reserve and even had some -- some money left over and so when -- when we looked at what are we going to do with -- with that money left over, we are tasked with improving our assets; right? So, we also created a partnership with the city over Fuller Park. If you recall Fuller Park, even though now it's really in the middle of the city and Ten Mile was in -- out in the county, out in the boonies where we played little league and -- and had, you know, recreation out there and so the -- we -- we had our own parks department and we approached the Parks Department of Meridian, which had at the time over 20 parks, and said, you know, it does -- the reciprocity doesn't -- doesn't make sense; right? So -- so, we -- we gifted and granted the -- the -- Fuller Park to the city. They created a lot of improvements and have done just a wonderful job with that. Charlie Rountree Field out there as -- as a championship field is awesome. So, have done a really good job there. And, then, Mayor Simison and 1, after his first election, you know, started talking about what -- what is Western Ada Rec's future; right? We -- we have got one asset that the city is now managing, could they do others? And we looked at some opportunities and one of those opportunities is the golf course creates significant revenue and a pool generally speaking is a hole that you throw money into; right? So -- so, could we match those up and could we -- and could we make a difference there. So, as we talked with our respective boards in the community, it -- it -- it became kind of a logical step for us to -- for Western Ada Recreation District to at least engage the current golf course operator and a little additional history as a — as a young energetic council member I had some -- one of my first initiatives was -- that was gifted to being by -- by the current council, of which Mr. Nary served, they said let's figure out how to take this -- this current operator and bring somebody else in and so that worked until it didn't and -- and -- and the course needed some money. So, Western Ada Recreation District purchased the lease and the assets from the former operator and, then, we dedicated at least two Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 5 of 56 years of our operating budget to -- to the parks department to be able to put together some of those improvements and -- and I think that we can all agree that we are -- that that course is in -- is in good shape and has done a good job and it -- and it really is a -- a very nice community asset. The last thing that we — that Western Ada Recreation District has done is that we had an operating budget of over 800,000 dollars at one time. We just approved in August our new operating budget. Our operating budget for the next fiscal year will be 50,000 dollars. That is 11 cents per taxable value to a levy and so we are -- we are really proud of that. I can tell you that -- that I -- I think I'm the only politician in Idaho trying to work myself out of a job and -- and have been very happy to do that. So, this transaction has been a couple years in the -- in -- in process and so we are here today with -- with the final. I have had the good fortune to be a steward for these assets for a number of years and -- and many years before that community leaders have -- have really passed the torch and so now we -- we really feel great about the Parks Department taking care of the community, serving the mission and -- and being able to serve the community with these assets. So, I appreciate your time here today and I would stand for any questions. Cavener: Thanks, Shaun. Little Roberts: Mr. Council? Cavener: Council, any questions? Council Member Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. President. Shaun, I just -- I don't have a question. I just want to say thank you. I have watched you through your years of service and, then, spearhead this project along with Steve and his amazing team and you have just done a fabulous job of leading WARD and just — and definitely you are leaving your mark on the community as always. But a sincere thank you to everybody involved in this project. S.Wardle: Thank you. Cavener: Any other questions, Council? Whitlock: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: Shaun, thank you as well. I'm the newest member of the Council, but I -- come at a time when others have built and preserved a great legacy in this -- in this community. Thank you for that. And, honestly, I was going to look in my wallet and double your money, but my wife got to it first, so -- but -- but I'm good for it. I will -- I will -- I will double your one dollar. Okay. Thank you. Cavener: Thank you, Council Member Whitlock. Any other questions? Overton: Council President? Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 6 of 56 Cavener: Council Member Overton. Overton: Just a little history. I'm one of those people that had the opportunity as a teenager to use the pool and use the golf course and I can't believe after this many years that they are not only still here, but they are in far greater shape and condition than they were back in -- shall I say the late 70s. I'm really glad that we are doing this, that we are making this happen, that we will take them over and continue to keep that legacy moving forward. Appreciate it, Shaun. Thank you. 2. Resolution 24-2474: Ratifying the Conveyance of Real and Personal Property from the Western Ada Recreation District; Accepting the Termination of the Western Ada Recreation District's Lease of Lakeview Golf Course; and Providing an Effective Date Cavener: Council -- okay. No action on Item 1, so we will move on to Item No. 2. Resolution 24-2474 for a motion. Whitlock: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: I move we approve Resolution 24-2474, ratifying the conveyance of real and personal property. Strader: Second. Cavener: It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? Okay. Council -- Mr. Clerk will call roll. Roll, Call- Cavener, yea; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Cavener: Moved and passed. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 3. Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property from Western Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian Cavener: We will now move on to Item 3, government transfer of personal property from the Western Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian. Whitlock: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 7 of 56 Whitlock: I move we approve the agreement for transfer of personal property from Western Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian. Strader: Second. Cavener: It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? Council, just real quick a quick moment of privilege again to thank Shaun and Steve and Emily and our Mayor. This is a good reminder I think is why the -- the parks tour is important. This was kind of a germ of an idea that kind of emerged at a parks tour many many years ago to -- to previous testimony I learned to swim at Meridian pool. It's neat this year that my son continues to learn how to swim at Meridian pool, play baseball at Fuller. The — the park at Settlers Village is the park that was in my neighborhood as a child, so that's the place where I probably got into more trouble than I should and so, you know, we are all here because of exceptional leadership that came before us that we were able to build upon and I really like to think that the Meridian Parks Department is able to exist because of the investment of our citizens in WARD many many years ago. So, this is I think really coming together with a -- it's a big big win for our community. Just want to thank our staff that made it happen. Cavener: With that Mr. Clerk -- actually, Mr. Nary, for an agreement do we need a roll call? Nary: We do not. Cavener: All right. So, moved and seconded. All in favor of accepting this agreement say aye. Any opposed? All unanimous and the decision is agreed upon. Thank you again for being here, Shaun. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. 4. Public Hearing continued from September 17, 2024 for District at Ten Mile (H-2023-0071) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located at the northwest corner of S. Ten Mile Rd. and 1-84 A. Request: Future Land Use Map Amendment to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan to change the designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent properties, resulting in a net change in the area as follows: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) (+9.26 acres), High Density Residential (HDR) (+2.66 acres), Mixed-Use Residential (MU-R) (- 10.61 acres), Mixed-Use Commercial (MU-C) (+0.32 acre), Mixed Employment (ME) (-0.22 acre) and High Density Employment (HDE) (-1.40 acres) as requested by the Applicant and as recommended by Staff on adjacent properties if the Applicant's request is approved. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 8 of 56 B. Request: Modified Development Agreements to the existing Development Agreements (Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) Inst. #2022-049799, Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073618, SJJV LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073617, Janicek Properties LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073616, to consolidate them into one (1) new agreement, which will replace the previous agreements (or a portion thereof, as applicable) and include a conceptual development plan for the overall area. C. Request: Rezone of 7.48 acres of land from the C-C to the TN-C district, 12.96 acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district, 9.13 acres from the C-C to the H-E district, 25.97 acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district, and 1 .37 acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district. D. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 38 building lost and one (1) common lot on 108.77 acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G, H-E and M-E zoning districts. Cavener: All right. Moving on. Item No. 4 is a public hearing continued from September 17th, 2024, for the District at Ten Mile. Before we turn it over to staff always think it's important we have got maybe some new people that have never maybe been to a City Council meeting before, so I would just to welcome you if this is your first City Council meeting. The way public land use action items go is staff will present some updated information, because this is continued. The applicant will have an opportunity to provide some of their perspective. We will, then, open it up as a public hearing that will give you as a citizen three minutes to provide your testimony on this item. After all of our public testimony has concluded the applicant will be able to provide a response. Council will, then, go into deliberation and they could possibly make a decision. So, we appreciate you all being here tonight. Public process is so important and we appreciate our applicant coming back another week in a row. We had a lengthy meeting last week that was going to go fairly late and I think the suggestion to continue for another week was well heard. So, with that, Mr. Parsons, I will turn it over to you. Parsons: Thank you, Mr. President, Members of the -- the Council. As you recall this was continued from last week's City Council hearing, but I did just want to mention, too -- I don't think staff will go into the full presentation again. We were able to get through that last week. But looking at the public record I would note know to the Council that there was four additional public testimony submitted as of today I saw that uploaded. And, again, the concerns were around the density, school overcrowding and transportation, which I'm probably sure you will have some questions on those tonight. Did confirm with the Clerk that we do have an ACHD representative tonight in attendance for today's hearing if you want to ask questions of ACHD or staff and, then, I have gone ahead and also prepared some slides to kind of touch on the land use and transportation elements in the planning, if the Council or -- if the Council has additional questions on those items as well. I think from the last hearing I was -- it was pretty clear Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 9 of 56 that you gave the applicant homework to do and you wanted to hear from them before -- before staff gives you any additional comments. So, I don't know if that's the order you want to take tonight, Mr. President, if you want the applicant — the applicant to come in and give you an update based on that homework that you assigned them last week or would you like staff to dive in on some of those Ten Mile elements and share with the Council what's kind of transpired the last couple of years, what's in the hopper, what conversation staff had with ACHD regarding the transportation elements in the plan. I'm happy to dive into some of those comments as well, if that's the -- the position the Council wants me to do tonight. So, I'm -- I'm open up to your -- your suggestions this evening. Cavener: Bill, I'm seeing gentle head nodding, so I think that's probably the right approach. Specifically maybe if you can talk a little bit about -- I think there was some inconsistency in the City of Meridian staff report about the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan and ACHD's interpretation of that and, then, maybe just for -- for Council, applicant and public's benefit, you know, Sonya did provide some additional information to the Council after our meeting last week just so that we were all on the same page. I think that's the right way to start. Parsons: Perfect. Thank you. I will go ahead and get to the -- the two slides that I have prepared for tonight's discussion. So, I know a lot of you -- at least last week we did get a draft ACHD staff report and, then, this week it did just get finalized. As you -- as you recall last hearing this is a Comprehensive Plan map amendment and the applicant's come forward with their plan and their changes and staff has recommended additional plans, but ultimately the -- the topic of discussion at that hearing was that there is a path forward either way with -- for the applicant to do what they want to do here. But I think it's still important to -- to touch bases of why we have the Ten Mile Plan. Yes, I -- I hear from the Council all the time it's -- it's dated or it's -- it may not be working the way we had expected it to and as -- as a planner it's tough to swallow, because the plan is a visioning document, it's not thou shalts, but if you look at the concepts in the plan it was pretty innovative at the time and a lot of those planning principles still pertain to today's world, whether you are in Idaho or in California or in Seattle or Portland area, these -- these concepts aren't new, they are --just they are just done and required in this specific area. So, first of all, I don't -- as -- as you all know and as Sonya mentioned last week, the applicant is proposing their own design elements for -- their own design guidelines for this area. The Council has done that with the property to the west -- or to the east on the Ten -- Ten Mile Crossing project on the other side of Ten Mile. I can tell you from the implementation of that it's worked very well. I -- I like that it's nice to get a variety of different design standards, but it also allows them flexibility to work with staff and -- and get those mix of uses that we envisioned. So, the only -- the only reason why I bring up this slide is because I just want -- I know we have newer Council Members and I just want to share with you that in 2002 -- or 2022 we came before you -- at least our long range planning team came before City Council and we provided you a land use analysis for that area. You wanted us to grade ourselves. How have we done as a city in that area? At that time we reported to you that there was 27 percent nonresidential uses in that area compared to Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 10 of 56 73 percent residential. As you recall in that document the plan envisioned a 48 to 52 split for nonresidential versus residential units. So, you can see based on that analysis at the time we were having less commercial than we needed in that area to support the amount of residential that had been approved and I would also mention that since that time we have had other approvals, which I have noted down below. So -- and with the -- the -- the adjustment that this applicant's proposing there is a good chance we are going to have more non-residential uses occurring in on this property as well, which is contaminated by the plan and, then, the other component of that -- and you can see here based on our -- in our code -- or in our land use plan -- the Ten Mile Specific Interchange Plan there are some design concepts that are in there and this is the matrix that we use to assess a development when it comes in and to find consistency with that plan and if you look this particular developer has a lot of its mixed-use residential and mixed-use commercial and if you look on this -- this matrix you can see those probably have the most design elements out of all the -- the various land uses in the Ten Mile area and that was for a reason. Again, it was meant to have a lot of employment, taller buildings, make it walkable, make it like its own little city; right? It was going to have all of these things integrated on these uses integrated. But as the applicant testified at the last hearing, you can still do that horizontally, you don't necessarily need to go vertically. So, that's -- again that's part of your purview tonight. Do you -- but I just want to at least let you know that this plan -- this is why staff has made the alternative recommendations to go commercial and medium high density residential and deviate from those land uses, because while the plan has some of those elements it doesn't have all of them and that's kind of in the consistent theme out in Ten Mile area. We have gotten some things, but we haven't gotten all the things and -- and rightfully so. The other component of that is the transportation elements -- or at least in the plan. The plan did contemplate a road network of collector streets and local streets and I will just -- and that's the -- the graphic here on the right. So, we did -- with all of those land uses that we planned out there as part of that public hearing process and adoption of the plan, we set forth a transportation foundation for the area. The applicant is -- is demonstrating compliance with that. So, I don't want to mislead you that they are not. The difficulty is and what you are seeing that kind of the discussion in the ACHD staff report is, you know, those assumptions and those road sections were designed for specific land uses or more employment or that things would be more self-contained and not draw people from the outer areas to drive to the area. So, that's why you are seeing a lot of the impacts on the road is because although we have a lot of residential in the area where we have supported that, some of the uses that are going in there, for example, a Scheels, although it provides employment it still draws a lot of traffic to it and that's where the plan doesn't contemplate it. It contemplates trip capture within itself, not from the outside areas as much. So, that's why you are seeing some of the roadways out there with these — this level of service F or why ACHD in their staff reports are saying do a traffic warrant analysis, do a roundabout analysis, because we got to know when you are going to trigger these requirements. At least I want to -- and so this slide here goes to what we are looking for and how it functions. So, I would mention to the Council, although it was late, ITD has requested that the developer submit a traffic impact study. I think all of the Council can agree and even the applicant can agree that the Ten Mile Interchange gets very exact over capacity. A lot of that has to do with these -- the Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 11 of 56 landscape island that we have near the interchange. I have been in several meetings over the years discussing about removing that landscaping that the city currently maintains in order to allow more stacking on that interchange so cars can go left onto the interstate. So, that is one way you can mitigate some of those things and we did encourage the applicant to continue to have dialogue with ITD to try to fix those issues. I would also mention to the -- the Council that we started this process with the applicant 16 months ago and we have had a series of meetings. I even worked with the economic development administrator try to -- with the applicant, ITD, ACHD and the city, we all wanted to partner on a regional traffic study to try to understand how this would impact State Highway 16. How does it work if we had the Linder Road overpass? How does it improve the Meridian Road overpass? We wanted to take a broader -- a more cumulative approach to studying this area and we wanted to understand if we could do a STARS agreement like we did at The Village to try to get some of those improvements ahead of time before all the development came on. Unfortunately, that never came to fruition and, then, ITD has lost a lot of their staff as well. So, a lot of those conversations we were having with those employees are no longer there and so we had to start at ground zero and the applicant understood that, although they tried to make their -- their best effort going forward. So, ultimately, if you had a chance to look at AC - Cavener: So, I don't mean to -- but I don't want to let that point go past. There was a -- it sounded like a collective effort from the city, the applicant and the highway district to do a regional traffic impact study. Parsons: That is correct. Cavener: So, I didn't -- I didn't fully understand any -- I'm not that bright. So, how come it didn't happen then? Parsons: Again just staff turnover. Timing. It was — again it would take us coming to you and asking you for additional dollars to see if the Council even wanted to participate in something like that. It's something that we historically don't do or haven't done. It was a new concept that we were trying to get. We wanted to get ahead of some of these issues before the application came before you and it is very complex as you know. And, again, it just never happened. I did have several conversations with ACHD whether or not a traffic study would be required. They -- they wanted a definite answer from the city and we never gave them one on the traffic study, because at the time we weren't sure if we were going to find consistency with the plan and we didn't need one or if this would be such a significant change from the deviation from the plan that it would require one, but what I can tell you is I did meet with ACHD staff and we went through this project and we talked about how the roads — the collector roads were being extended consistent with the plan. So we knew that. And, then, some of these things that you saw in the ACHD staff reports were things that would have been addressed in a traffic study. So, staff felt comfortable that although we didn't get an official traffic study, all the things that you are seeing in ACHD's staff report with this project would have been discussed or -- or identified in a traffic study. So, although you didn't get a true Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 12 of 56 traffic study, you know, it's -- I think you have gotten the information that we need. When -- when are the timing for the signals? When do we improve the Ten Mile intersection. So, again, Ten Mile Road and Franklin Roads are built out. So, at level of service F it's going to be that way for a while and that's something that the Council will have to determine if that's -- you want to add -- contribute more to that going forward. I don't know how you mitigate something that's already built to its ultimate build out. And, then, as you know, there is -- staff had asked for a phasing plan on this project, because, again, that is critical to us in our world because we need to know when certain infrastructure improvements are needed, what is going to trigger those improvements to those roadways, meaning the signals at Black Cat and Grand Mogul. The improvements at the intersection of Ten Mile and Grand Mogul. Umbria Hills and the Franklin Interchange — or intersection -- all of those will require signals at some point in the future and, then, you can see in ACHD's staff report they have requested that happen with first phase. So, they want questions -- those -- those questions answered as well to see what the mitigation will be. So, again, I think the applicant's aware of that. They have met with ACHD multiple times, too, and they are aware of those requirements going forward. But, again, I wanted you guys to at least be aware of some of those conversations and, then, highlight some of those requirements that ACHD is requiring, because it is very important. If I can go back to my land use, if you can see the other developments in the area, we have Black Cat industrial, which is on the east side of Black Cat. That's all -- that's been approved -- conceptually approved for possibly a million square feet of industrial or flex space uses and you can see Black Cat's not expected to be widened until 2036 to 2040. That's why that light and that -- those intersection improvements are going to be critical and that's why ACHD has said we need to understand that. Now, to the applicant's credit they are extending a mile of collector road into this development. So, they are going to connect from Black Cat -- or Ten Mile all the way through to Black Cat as part of their phase one plans and that will be a critical connection for everything that is occurring in this area. Council just recently approved the Avani development which is that R-8 just near the Black -- the same intersection just right across the street from Black Cat industrial. South of that is Farmstone, 389,000 square feet of nonresidential and, then, Meridian 118, which is also part of this project, but owned by a different developer, was approved with 552 apartments. So, you can see with all of the things that are happening in this area it's -- all of these impacts are just not on this development, it's all of these other ones that will also contribute to that -- and that's why it's critical from staff's perspective that -- and what Council -- a letter from Council is we need to understand or look at phasing and understand how this will all work, because it will be very very critical moving forward. I would also mention to Council that the applicant has a lot of various approvals in with the city already for the extension of these roadways, the sewer and water and trying to coordinate all that with such a complex project has been challenging for us and we are -- we are getting our hands around it. I actually have a meeting next week to get a spreadsheet together. We are going to schedule a series of meetings with the applicant and make sure that we get everything dialed in before we can get ready to issue building permits for anything out here, because, again, we need to understand those impacts. So, anyways, that's kind of a long about way to say, you know, I -- although applicant is here with a project I think it's important that we discuss a lot of these things Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 13 of 56 tonight, meaning transportation, that phasing and help them answer some of those questions that you asked them to bring forth to you as well last time. So, I will go ahead and conclude my comments for this evening and stand for any questions the Council may have. Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Parsons. Council, questions? Strader: Council President Cavener? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: Thank you. Thank you, Bill. A question for you. So, it looks like we are sitting at 27 percent nonresidential uses in Ten Mile versus 48 percent target. Obviously that has been a challenge for us in a lot of these areas where we are trying to see more commercial and industrial. A question for you. Taking into account these other projects that have not yet come to fruition -- so, the Black Cat industrial, the Avani, the Farmstone, is that -- is that kind of 27 percent pro forma to include those or once you include those what percentage does it look like? Parsons: Yeah. Mr. President, Vice-Chair Strader, I -- I don't have that information for you tonight, but you can see based on the square footages that the applicant's doing and based on those others here, it's definitely going to help those numbers or increase that. But they do also have residential as part of their plan. But they are committed to staying to that 15 units or less to the acre, which is contemplated. So, yes, you could get townhomes, some higher density there. It's -- I think -- I believe Sonya had somewhere between 250 and 400 dwelling units if I remember correctly. So, you could add that to the mix as well. But, certainly, happy to -- to encourage some of those numbers and -- and get that information to you if -- if you want me to. Strader: Council President? Cavener: Please. Strader: Yeah. No, I -- I was sort of just curious. So, the 27 percent, just to walk me through -- the 27 percent, right, that was based on our 2022 land use analysis. So -- so, sort of to be fair to this, which would be a lot of work to try to update and so I'm not asking you to just do that on the fly, but just intuitively based on what you know of these projects and this project, do you feel like we are going to be coming closer to that 48 percent when all of those changes are kind of said and done? Not sure no visibility or it's going to get worse? I guess like give me a direction. Parsons: Mr. President, Members of the Council, it's -- it's hard to say. As I mentioned to you it's based on land use. So, if you were to ask me if they had -- if it's all retail, again, the -- a lot of -- it really comes down to the land use and the type of uses we were wanting there. If you looked at our staff report we were hopeful for more employment. So, again, more Silverstone type developments or El Dorado with the Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 14 of 56 three, four, five, six story employment buildings, which this can have some of that, it -- it's showing as having some of that. That's some of the land use plan that the applicant showed you -- if I can get there for you. So, they have -- kind of gave you an area one, area two, area three and so this could definitely get intensified more in the future. don't -- but in this scenario, yes, I would say you are going to add to that nonresidential -- Strader: Okay. Strader: -- total. That's -- it's inevitable. You can see how much they have planned here for -- area two and three are quite a bit larger than one and, then, also don't forget that this was part of the Meridian 118 site that will be industrial as well and the farm zones adjacent to that. So, yes, along that interstate corridor you would definitely be increasing that nonresidential square footage in the area. What that amount will be in the future we don't know, but the applicant did propose some square footages on their concept plan that was submitted with their application. So, I -- again, their -- their vision is having some of those employment offices -- employment uses out there. Again, they don't have anyone yet, but that's part of it and that's why you see that on Area Three here. Strader: Thanks, Bill. Parsons: You are welcome. Overton: Council President? Cavener: Councilman Overton. Overton: Bill, just so I'm clear, so the ACHD study at 33 pages is pretty extensive. There is quite a few notations in here of things that they request that the applicant does. What I want to know before we get the applicant up is -- is planning in agreement with what ACHD has put in their report on this area? Parsons: Mr. President, Members of the Council, those are the -- what Mindy has in her report are the items that we discussed that she would have in a report. So, I would say, yes, that's what we talked about and I said, yes, we would appreciate that information in your report if we are not going to require a traffic study, because we need to understand those impacts. Overton: Council President, follow up? Cavener: Councilman Overton. Overton: The glaring thing I kept highlighting in here was the fact that there wasn't a traffic study just because of the number of trips daily that would be generated. If it was Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 15 of 56 required what kind of -- I don't know about cost so much as time would it take to get that done? Parsons: Mr. President, Members of the Council, I don't have an estimated time frame. The applicant would probably be the best one to -- to -- to share that information with you. They know the consultants are stretched out there and -- and time commitment. So, it would have been a significant amount of time, three to four months I would -- I would estimate is what we have heard on average and that's why, again, we have elected to kind of -- what would be -- what are some of the impacts and include that in a staff report and that's what ACHD has done. The other thing to mention to the Council as well is that although back in 2007 the reason why a lot of times in the Ten Mile area they ask us if -- if it's consistent with the plan is because back in 2007 a traffic study was done that studied this area before all the land uses. It was -- it was based on the assumption of these land uses and that's why you see the road network and all of the street typologies and street sections that we have in the plan because that's what the traffic study looked at and that's how we -- we vetted that and came up with that grid -- that layout that I showed you in the plan. So, that is -- that traffic study did that -- create it. Then, again, this is only the north side of the interstate; right? It's not the south side. That's also included. But, again, you get the point. The idea is that, again, if we found it consistent they are going to like -- we are going to just default to that existing traffic study in 2007 and -- and we are going to be good. But, again, it all comes down to land uses, if we are changing that -- if we are changing the comp plan and we are making different assumptions and adding more retail where employment could have been or if employment -- if it was intended to get those -- capture those trips within the local street network and not from outside activity, that does have a different impact on the transportation system. So, again, it's -- it's always difficult when you try to get it -- you put a plan in place, but you don't really have any users, it's really when you get down to zoning and you get down to this point in the -- the process it's like how is it all going to work and that's kind of where we are at tonight. It's like does this all work? Based on some of the feedback from ACHD and ITT it looks like there is some -- some additional information they want. They want to see it get proved up and when -- the amount of trips -- when those things will be required. So, the applicant will continue to work with those two agencies. But, again, I think ACHD is the same -- same boat we are, they -- they want that information and -- and, again, that comes down to phasing. When can we get -- when can we expect the timing for these things, because it -- it will be critical. The one important element that I like that the applicant may also touch upon is the underpass that connects to Ten Mile Crossing. To me that will be a critical connection, because people won't need to go across Ten Mile to get to that other side of that employment and those -- those services, they can actually go around Ten Mile -- you know, go underneath the over -- the interchange and, then, get to that other side and get access over there. So, again, that's going -- I know I'm kind of preaching to the choir, I apologize, but, again, timing, phasing is all critical and that's why we had asked for that phasing plan for you this evening. Overton: Council President? Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 16 of 56 Cavener: Councilman Overton. Overton: You know, I know we are doing a lot of talking about ACHD and their partner in this program as we go forward this evening and I do believe we have Brooke Green from ACHD remote, so if we have questions as we continue to go we can get that input. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Seeing none, invite the applicant up. Mr. Wardle, again, thank you again for your smart suggestion last week to continue another week. We really do appreciate it. Wardle: Council President Cavener, my -- my pleasure. It's always -- always good to come back to City Council, isn't it? So, we -- and Bill will pull it up here in just a second. I have answers to your questions and we have reviewed an outline and I -- I want to start, though, with the point we talked about last week, that the entirety of this property was annexed and previously zoned. So, this is not an annexation where you are making those determinations. Those evaluations were previously done. We are coming to you with a master plan taking those five disparate parcels, bringing them together in a cohesive whole. If we didn't do that each of the -- those five properties and property owners could be coming in just with individual development applications and you won't -- don't have this holistic look and I understand and respect ITD's job, they have a very difficult job, but, to be honest, I have been telling ITD how we can fix a lot of these issues in this community for 20 years and they don't work with the municipalities and they don't work with ACHD on this interface between regional, statewide, interstate traffic and how it affects locally. So, what I want to do tonight is go through what I -- I grouped the topics that you gave me into five areas. Project timeline, transportation, schools, parks, recreational uses and, then, design standards. Project timeline. I know that when we talk about all of this acreage everybody automatically freaks out, because we are talking about a big area, but we have to take into consideration how long it actually takes to bring elements in and you will see how this works with the transportation planning. But I want to talk about the improvements that are underway and I appreciate staff's acknowledgement and recognition on the importance of that through collector, which, to be honest, I don't have any idea what we name it. I have seen it called ten different things, but it's -- it's the collector that runs from Ten Mile to Black Cat. Early on we entered into an agreement with the property owners and developers on the west side with frontage on Black Cat to extend that the full length and worked with the property owners as we -- we own and control the Meridian 118 property, but work with the Blacks with the other property here tonight to come up with that. So, that collector is getting constructed first. You have all seen it, it's out there, we are putting the utilities in and that collector will be delivered in spring of 2025. 1 mean we are -- we are almost to the end of September, we have done a lot of work, but realistically you are just not going to get a mile long collector paved. Now, when we think about collectors there is one collector in this city that I don't think we recognize its actual benefit and that's Records. Runs parallel to Eagle Road and provides you the connection on Ustick and as a former resident of Meridian when I helped get a bunch of Improvements done on Records Road, I -- I utilized Records Road, because that keeps your local trip -- that keeps your trips to The Village, to Kleiner Park off of Eagle Road Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 17 of 56 and as we look through our community we have always had the discussion with ACHD and with the various municipalities, what do collectors look like and we know that our residential collectors we don't want people using for through traffic, but commercial collectors we do and so what this roadway does -- and it's the first road that we are building and it's a mile worth of road that these three development -- four development groups have come together to jointly build, because they recognize the importance of it. Then the second element will be the connection of Umbria to the north and, then, to the south and the 118 plat, the purple segment that you see there, we will build that element as part of the Meridian 118 Vanguard Village parcel. That is a collector. And, then, that will at some point connect over to Ten Mile Crossing with the infrastructure that was originally built. So, with the forethought that everybody had, recognizing the desired intensity of development at Ten Mile Crossing and on this side of the road as well, we have mechanisms in place so that local Meridian residents that are shopping, working, doing whatever in these developments will not have to access Ten Mile Road. They can do it from the connection to the collectors east of Ten Mile Crossing and to the west of us on Black Cat. Now, the question was posed to us, you know, what improvement -- what -- what uses are coming. So, I shared with you that we do have under contract for the 118 property several uses and the first two uses that are going to occur are light industrial, light industrial warehousing, flex-type space that Adler Group is bringing in on the western portion -- the western 20 acres that we have of that, as well as a daycare facility that we have been working with that will be located there. Those are the first two farthest along in terms of conditional use permits and permitting. We, then, have under contract a hospitality user that's proposed two hotels and a recreation facility user. Now, when do those move forward? Well, having negotiated those contracts and the six plus months that it takes for us to negotiate those contracts and, then, the years' worth of due diligence that happens and you back into those, those two users at the earliest are probably summer of 2026 for a hotel operator out there at the absolute earliest and sometime in 2027 for the recreational use operator. So, those are the first four uses. You are -- you are thinking about maybe 200,000 square feet of flex space, a large daycare facility, some hotels, a potential recreation user and I know what everybody always wants to know is, well, when is the retail coming? Well, the absolute earliest that you would see any of the retail, which, then, starts to implicate those concerns about is this a regional draw, is this a local draw, the absolute earliest would be the first quarter of 2027 and, to be honest, I don't think my people are realistic with their timing, because let's look at what it's taken for us to do the 118, go from a preliminary plat to a final plat and all of that. We are a year. And here we are still going to have to come back when we are done with this, if you approve the applications in front of you, we still have to execute the development agreement and finalize the development agreement. Your counsel and I are going to take months -- three, four months on that probably. We still have to do the zoning ordinance amendments. That's still a process we -- we are going through of this and it's sequential, but this is not 200 acres you approve tonight and we are pulling permits next week. This very much is when we look at Ten Mile Crossing, which is the first phase of Ten Mile Crossing with the office buildings is probably 80 percent done after what? After eight years. We look at Eagle View Landing, which we have worked on for seven years. Eagle View Landing is 50 percent done after seven years. The beauty here is you get to see how all of this comes together on the front Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 18 of 56 end. So, when we talk now about transportation -- let's talk about the elements and let's talk about timing. The purpose of a traffic study is to evaluate and identify what mitigation measures are needed in light of fundamental changes in a land use situation where we are going from unannexed, unzoned property to something else. Now -- and we will get to the land use a little bit further, but are we proposing slightly more residential than what is already zoned? Yes. We are proposing an additional nine acres of residential zoning at that 15 unit to the eight to 12 -- either R-15 or TN-C. So, you take the nine, you multiply it by eight -- we are talking maybe 70 additional units. When we look at the overall site this is an intensive commercial unit and commercial development. Now, what's the consequence of that? Well, the residential developments that you have already approved in this area they need commercial services. They need the medical office. They need the retail. They need those things. Because where are they going now? They are either going to Ten Mile Road for the little bit of retail that we have there now. We will have more in the future. And, then, on over to Meridian Road or they are going out Franklin back towards Nampa or Cherry -- the Cherry Lane area. When we create that connectivity we minimize those types of trips and so that's why, you know, yes, ACHD said there is nothing programmed for Ten Mile. Why is there nothing programmed for Ten Mile? Because it's totally built out and the interchange has been constructed. But what is IT -- ACHD telling us? We need to construct the collector system, which we are. We need to do signal warrants and those signal warrants will be triggered as we do plats, because we obviously can't build anything here until we have platted these lots. So that's where they do it. On this map you see the three yellow stars, those are the signal warrants where ACHD wants us to test stuff in the future and build when warranted signalized intersections at those locations. The orange is the one that we have already committed to as part of the 118 and enhancing that with Ten Mile Crossing to the east. So, let's -- those are the developer elements. We have the commercial collectors. We have the signal improvements. We have the additional signals when it's warranted on Black Cat. You will see some developer -- additional developments by other developers, because we don't front on Black Cat, but you have approved other applications that will have improvements on Black Cat and they have those same warrant requirements. If they push it over the need for a signal before we do somebody's going to have to do that. So, those are the elements that we implement and how we do it. Now, let's look at ACHD's plan. ACHD, as I indicated, has development improvements on Black Cat with the various applications that are coming in. We also have the CIP and their work plan. Now, I know that there is some concern that they are -- you know, that -- and -- and Bill addressed it that the segment south of Franklin on Black Cat is not programmed in the near five year period. It is more of a ten year period. But when we look at the actual five year work plan and ACHD's updating the five year work plan tomorrow night and approving it, so I have pieces here from the current one and the -- and the coming one, you do see there is the star, that's yellow, that's where the project is, but those improvements over on Linder are programmed to occur in that 2025, '26, '27 horizon, the time period that it will take for us to start seeing the impact from our improvements and you will also see that, you know, in the current Ten Mile -- in the current Linder plan they have the engineering and the right-of-way acquisition and in the fourth coming one the intention is to add construction in '26, '27. Why is that important? Well, the purpose Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 19 of 56 of that Linder connection is to provide an additional alternative connection for Meridian residents traveling north-south not having to go out to the interchanges and reducing, then, the traffic on Meridian and Ten Mile, which as we know, is what we saw when the Locust Grove overpass finally was constructed many years ago, that it eliminated some trips that were going out to Eagle Road as the closest way to get across the interstate. Now, longer term, yes, Black Cat and Franklin we see in those improvements to the north of that intersection -- the west of that intersection are programmed, but to the south that is -- that is still out there. It's in the Capital Improvement Plan, but it's not yet programmed. So, let's talk about ITD and what the timing is, because State Highway 16 as we know is -- is -- it has been a blessing and a curse, that we have -- we have now gone through essentially two recessions with this -- with this project. We did the -- the first part in the great recession and the -- the post 9/11 recession and now we are -- we are on to the next part and we made a mistake -- we made a mistake doing that as part of a project and not a whole project. Why did we make that mistake? Well, it's a mistake because you are taking all of those vehicles off of Highway 44, off of Highway 16, dumping them on 20-26 and we, then, improved Ten Mile Road with an interchange. So, all of that traffic that looks to go east on the Interstate we know is traveling that segment of Chinden and, then, on down Ten Mile Road and that's why we see the level of service F in the p.m. peak hour. Well, Highway 16, by making that connection, will greatly improve that and we know that the first phase of Highway 16, which will be open and permit its use all the way from Highway 20-26 to the interstate will occur sometime in 2026. Now, in the future ITD will be making some additional improvements. They will be building some additional -- additional segments, some additional overpasses to address that, but it will open in 2026. So, the next question -- and we can come back to that. The next question just is as we think about what the transportation system is -- I -- I drew you these maps, because they are just kind of the traffic sheds. The traffic shed we see today takes all of that state highway regional traffic and puts it on Ten Mile. Our local traffic all gets put on to Ten Mile. But between now and the time we start actually building you are going to see that a lot of that local traffic will no longer have to come to Ten Mile. That regional traffic will not have to come to Ten Mile. So -- Cavener: Mr. Wardle, your time has expired -- Wardle: And we have only covered two -- Cavener: We have a question or two, so I'm going to at least open the floor for questions if Council have additional questions of the applicant about anything they have or have not covered that you have an interest in. Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Cavener: Yeah. I think it would be great to -- I think you got most of your points about transportation out there. I think if you want to touch on schools that would be fantastic. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 20 of 56 Wardle: So, as indicated, we have requested, essentially, an additional nine acres of multi-family. Everything that you see there west of that curved road, Umbria Hills Drive, is already zoned TN-C, already contemplates residential. We did that because we feel it's appropriate to have a -- a better buffer, a better transition and it's more consistent with -- we think with the area that the -- the plan comprehended for a mixed-use -- with both mixed-use residential, mixed-use commercial, it contemplates more. But at the acreage, with the density that's permitted, at most you are going to see 400 units. Per the West Ada School District's analysis, as confirmed by your staff, who have done it as well, that potentially generates 53 additional students. Now, Chaparral Elementary is the most critical and -- and certainly at the highest when we look at those -- those other ones there. The thing about this is this residential element is going to require significantly more and future approvals depending on whether you designate it as TN-C or you designate it as R-15 a developer -- and we are not a group that does this type. We are -- we are going to have a development partner -- somebody else is going to come in and be presenting that to you at some point in the future. But for a 200 acre application we are talking about 50 students and we are talking about 50 students who will come to our West Ada School District from a development that because it is so intensively commercial you -- and because we don't have exemptions on the commercial side of things, this project is going to more than fund the proportionate share allocable to it. So, when we think about those 53 students -- I mean that's based upon the analysis that we have, we recognize that Chaparral is the one that's closest to full. It's not beyond where we see and we see the West Ada School District has identified, you know, their standard conditions here and we think that as you look at the time that it's going to take to develop this with the commercial elements that that is not a concern. The -- the concern over density that you have heard and -- and more housing from the public I think just doesn't reflect what's actually been proposed. We are not talking additional single family residences that are going to have a higher number of children and we are -- we are focused on what is already entitled and what's contemplated. So, yes, out of 200 acres we have requested an additional nine be rezoned from the C-C zone to the TN-C and, you know, staff has indicated an R-15 would be their preferred zone. We are ambivalent, because the densities get you to the same place and so do the same style. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Whitlock: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: Could you also just touch on the -- the parks and -- right next to Chaparral you have got Fuller Park and that there was some concerns from the public about the impacts there. Wardle: Okay. So, as we indicated, you know, the -- the -- the point was raised last week I believe by you Council Member Whitlock, you know, what is the activity space within this more dense residential element going to look like? And to that -- I don't know. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 21 of 56 1 don't have a site plan for you. We are not here with a conditional use permit, but we can tell you a couple things. First of all, that element and what you see there in green -- we have not fully tiled the Purdam Drain. Why? Because there is the recognition that with the right of way that goes with the Purdam Drain that is an appropriate place for us to either evaluate using it as an amenity or using it as park space. So, that's what that green area that you see there is the Purdam Drain, 85 feet wide, hundred -- 1 ,500 feet long. So, that's an area that you are not going to be building on top of. We also recognize that under your current code there are very specific requirements about the amount of active space that's available and the amenities and we don't need to go into that, because somebody else who likes doing that will be back either to Planning and Zoning or you to deal with that in the future. As to the rest of the project staff hit on this previously and showed you this slide, but when we look at the commercial piece -- and this is just the commercial piece that's not the 118, 15 percent is required to be qualified open space, but we are providing 27 percent in that area. Now, there are a couple other elements that are not fully included in that analysis, because they are in the 118 approval and what is that? Well, I would direct your attention to the Williams Pipeline, which is that line that slashes down through the -- the property on the lower center. The Williams Pipeline parcel is a common parcel on the 118 Vanguard Village plat that will be a common lot that's 2.88 acres and under your code we have to improve a 50 foot buffer with pathway along the Interstate. So, you have those significant facilities and, actually, those are both the -- the plans for those are included with the preliminary plat that those will be constructed now. So, I recognize that there is not a Storey Park included in this project. There is -- there is not that type of park facility, but I have spent time reviewing, you know, your park master plan and this area doesn't contemplate that type of community park, I think in part because of the significant amount of commercial and industrial use that's planned in the Black Cat area. So, will there need to be play areas and active areas in the residential elements? Absolutely. If your Parks Department did think that this was an appropriate location for some type of community park -- I mean we can have that conversation, but I think the concerns that were articulated by members of the public last week didn't appreciate the limited scope and the nature of the residential elements and certainly didn't -- didn't appreciate the significant amount of -- of light industrial commercial and industrial property west of Black Cat. So, this is an area that probably is underserved with park space, but the locations for those parks really should have been closer to Franklin Road where the residences are. Because it doesn't make a lot of sense to put those down, you know, next to the freeway farther away and with those more intensive commercial uses. So, we think it meets all of those requirements. The concerns about the multi-family will be addressed in the future when that application comes forward with a specific design and we think that the pathway elements that are proposed here again integrate with the pathway improvements to the east on -- on Ten Mile Crossing. So, you are going to end up with -- you know -- well, when we are done here and, then, when the Corey Barton project comes in you will have almost a mile and a three-quarters of pathway between Ten Mile Crossing and the district. Taylor: Mr. President? Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 22 of 56 Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Mr. Wardle, on this slide that's up the -- near the top there is the red outlined area kind of where your residential is proposed, what you are suggesting if I'm just tracking it correctly is that hard to define what that may look like depending on what the development proposal actually is when your development partners or whoever is coming to develop the residential; is that correct? Wardle: Correct. But with the caveat that -- that -- that red piece up top, that is the Purdam Drain right of way. So, you are going to have green space of some type in that area. Taylor: Okay. And, Mr. President, quick follow up? I -- I wrote down when you were talking at the beginning of your presentation when you talked about adding nine -- nine acres of residential. I wrote down maybe 70 units. I thought that was what I heard you say. And, then, just a second ago you said at most 400 units. I might be misunderstanding where you are talking about what. So, could you just tell me kind of holistically what you -- you think may be developed there with the residential? Are we talking 70 units on top of what's allowed or -- and, then, 400 is the total maximum? Is that -- am I understanding that right? Wardle: Mr. President, Council Member Taylor, yes, you are. It's considering that right, that we are -- we are talking about 30 -- 34 acres at eight units to the acre where -- eight plus units to the acre, which are going to put you at 400. Now, right now we have approximately 24 acres that are already zoned TN-C at that density and what we have requested is the additional nine. So, the additional nine is where you get the 70 from. So, it would be 400 minus 70 would be the upper limit if -- if that sliver east of Umbria were not rezoned. Overton: Mr. President? Cavener: Yes, Council Member Overton. Overton: Mr. Wardle, I want to make sure that I understand that you are in compliance -- in agreement with the ACHD study when they request that you will work with them on all of the signal analysis, roundabout analysis, as this whole thing proceeds. Is there any part of it that you are not in agreement with? Wardle: Council President, Council Member Overton, no, we agree with the ACHD staff report and we support it and we are -- we are fine with signal warrants, because those are the types of things that we expect in -- in the types of developments in fluid areas. So, we appreciate ACHD's work on this. ACHD has been here with your staff, with us for the 16 months that we have pulled these five parcels together. So, yes, we support the staff report. Overton: Thank you. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 23 of 56 Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Just another question on the residential. Can you just kind of walk me through again why you are wanting to propose a little bit more residential than maybe previously contemplated versus the employment? Is that just sort of looking at the market conditions, making this pencil out or are there other reasons? If you could just walk me through that a little bit. Wardle: Sure. Council President, Council Member Taylor, so this is the residential parcel. When you look at the current Ten Mile plan, basically everything north of the Purdam Drain is designated as mixed-use residential. Now, that mixed-use residential band is north of the Purdam Drain, but what got zoned as TN-C for commercial is that -- essentially that portion west of Umbria, that -- that main north-south drive there. So, as we looked at this, to be honest, I wouldn't say it's driven by market conditions, because I don't think anybody in their right mind would be doing additional multi-family right now. It was more a planning consideration that as we look at the already zoned C-C, retail general commercial type property that's to the east, that it makes sense to have a buffer and a more dense multi-family product probably made sense as the buffer right there, so that you do something with the townhouses as depicted here or those elements as you get to the -- the less dense single family residential property to the north and the -- the medium density to the -- the west. So, why did we do it? We did it because we felt from a planning perspective it provided additional -- additional integration and separation from the single family to the -- the multi-family to the retail and, you know, it -- I don't think our design guys necessarily liked the abruptness of having a residential use on one side of a collector and a -- and retail immediately on the other side. I think they felt that that would encourage it to function through Umbria like a Records as opposed to a little more residential and residential serving. So, that's -- that's the rationale. Again, it's -- it is nine acres and out of the 200 acres it's part of the application. It's one of those where we can work with it, we can work without it, it's just a recognition that as we have worked to try to keep the rough area of the land use map designations, as we reorient those to implementation, that we wanted to keep those roughly the same and so that's part of it, too, is the direction I gave from a legal perspective is we know we need to reallocate and move some of these land use designations to support zoning based upon where the collectors actually are going to get constructed, but we don't want to change the overall ratio of the mixed-use residential, mixed-use commercial, high employment, because that's what all of the traffic analysis has been done. That's what the planning's been done previously. I really -- you know, the -- the nine acres has caused more conversation on stuff related to this application than I ever anticipated. Taylor: Mr. President, I would like you to address the design standards, because that was a question I had, because I'm thinking about your previous application we had a few months ago in this area where we had a long discussion about design standards and were they outdated. However, recognize that such a large thing -- instead of the Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 24 of 56 city kind of deciding what do we want to see, we are almost allowing you to decide what those design standards are if we are to -- Wardle: Sure. Taylor: -- I would like to hear -- Wardle: Yeah. So, I will -- I will address that really briefly. As staff indicated you have -- you have gone through this exercise before with the integration of the three development agreements across Ten Mile at Ten Mile Crossing and the Ten Mile plan contemplated that for larger master planned areas within the Ten Mile plan that -- that the private sector should be encouraged to come forward with what their vision is. So, we looked at what we know well with our retail team and with our office team, we looked at lessons to be learned from Ten Mile Crossing and, you know, the Ten Mile center development plan and design guidelines were put together and, to be honest, since my dad worked extensively on that, I told my guys to plagiarize it. I said just go look and see how my dad did that because it makes our job much easier when your staff has a model that works. So, our design team took that to heart and structurally went and said -- and talked with staff about is it working at Ten Mile Crossing? What is the process? How do we do it so that you are not having different processes. So from a process perspective we have modeled what we learned from Ten Mile Center. From a design perspective ours is a little bit different because the first thing that our team did is we have put together -- and it's in the packet and I don't anticipate that you read it, but a 33 page narrative of what the standards are and what the goals are that we are trying to implement, as well as identifying how we take the elements of the Ten Mile plan and actually put them into effect. So, this gets put into effect with the process that's spelled out in the document. The development agreement gets recorded, it's integrated with it and we now have a narrative that provides standards and directions to all future users in a variety of design elements with specific analysis of how to implement it for uses. So, don't think we have as many pictures as Ten Mile Center, because I think part of the rationale is that we want to give -- describe for people what we want, have a mechanism to review and approve it and, then, come forward. Now, one thing I'm really proud of with this is I did search it and the word earth does not appear once. So, it gives us much more flexibility if people want to be creative as to colors and materials. But here is an example of the street frontage section. Identifying where we are going to do street frontage is contemplated by the Ten Mile plan, examples that our team has used elsewhere to guide people so that there is that flexibility, but, then, identify how we implement that and the same with architectural standards. Again these are buildings that we have either designed or worked on in various contexts and we are not trying to replicate the standards, the actual standards of what things look like are not what's across the street at Ten Mile Center, but the process by which we get there will be very similar and I think it is workable for your staff, because it -- it makes sure that any user knows exactly what they have to do before they come pull the CZC. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 25 of 56 Whitlock: Yeah. Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: Mr. Wardle, first thank you for responding to the questions and preparing this. It's -- it's helped ease some of my concerns. I think I mentioned last week I live off of Black Cat, so I come up Black Cat and Franklin and Ten Mile to get on the freeway and go downtown to work every day and that Franklin-Ten Mile piece is -- takes almost as long as getting on the freeway and getting downtown. I'm concerned about -- appreciate what you said about Highway 16 and the Linder overpass and that's eased some of my concerns that it will disperse some of that traffic on Ten Mile, but at the same time as we develop and backfill into this it will add more cars. So, I -- I just wonder in the timeline and the phasing that you did talk about, if in '26 or '27 or '28 we are going to find ourselves really at LOS F again or still with no improvements. The other question I have for you again on the -- the -- the traffic lights -- again, if I try to come home anytime between 4:00 and 6:00 o'clock at night I'm stacking on to 1-84 and sitting on the freeway trying to get off onto Ten Mile to go north on Ten Mile, my concern is if there is another traffic light at -- at Ten Mile Crossing that's going to stack even further and cause more backup I believe coming off the freeway trying to go north. Can you respond or talk to that? Wardle: Council Member -- President, Council Member Whitlock, I think when we talk about that signal you already have part of a signal there at that intersection. So, it's about the improvement of the rest of it and the construction of the rest of it. I recognize the concerns about Ten Mile Road. I recognize that ITD -- ITD probably should have had some more forethought about what they did there, but there is not an immediate solution and I do think -- and I appreciate staff, because the conversations that we have had is, okay, how do we address stacking to get off of Ten Mile and onto the interstate? How do we do that? So, the whole issue of signal warrants is enhanced signals do not happen -- although that signal will happen as part of the 118 application and the plat, just because that was part of the requirements and -- and it's already there, but signal improvements for something we know that we have to address with -- with ACHD and we have to be reflexive and responsive as to timing. I wish I had a better answer for you, but I can't wave the magic wand and fix that and I don't want to seem like we don't care, because people coming here are our customers, our clients, our -- our users and their experience is important as well. We think with the mix of uses that we are trying to put here that this is very much focused on being a neighborhood serving use, not a regional commercial serving use and, obviously, Scheels is a very unique user across the street. The types of uses that we are talking about or the types of neighborhood serving retail and -- and type of office that we have done elsewhere. So, that's not a good answer. I don't have a good answer for you. The answer I do have is that we all have to work together and we have to recognize that the -- you know, if the landscape island is part of the solution, then, yes, we will work on that with you and do it. Where our discomfort with ITD is is once again ITD is at the party too late. I mean ITD — ITD has known that these parcels have been zoned this way for years. ITD has known that this is going to develop. It's consistent with your plan. ITD has known the importance of Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 26 of 56 Linder overpass that you all have been trying to get ITD to focus on and cooperate with. So I appreciate what ACHD has done and I recognize and I think -- I think the way that I wrap this up is we are about implementing the Ten Mile plan. I think the Mayor said it really well last week, that part of the reason that we haven't gone back and revisited all the Ten Mile plan is there is very little still to be annexed. So, now it's about implementation and implementing that plan means there are certain things we have to do to get the functioning commercial collectors. There are certain things that we have to do to get the impact fees that are going to pay and move some of these other items farther up the schedule and I think Black Cat Road is a prime example of south of Franklin to the interstate is a segment which with the development that's going on there that segment in the next iteration of the CIP probably moves up much much higher, because it becomes so critical to that north-south connectivity here in Meridian. So it's -- we, unfortunately, live in an auto centric world and the way we solve that is we have to make certain choices. Is the Ten Mile interchange -- you know, as we look back at the Ten Mile plan, you know, the density of residential development probably isn't what was necessarily contemplated and we have seen more residential, but the other thing is that we -- we all get in our cars and we go to work. That is two trips a day. The other seven trips a day that our households make are those local trips to run to school, run to practice, run to those other things and, you know, for the longest time we talked about trip capture. We are going to have trip capture. It's not really trip capture, it's trip shortening and, to be honest, as a resident of Meridian my wife found that our trip -- her trip shortened when we moved to Meridian in part because we waited to move to a neighborhood where I had done the commercial development and she knew the benefits to that and she was like this is great. I only have to drive, you know, five minutes for what I used to have to drive 15 or 20. So, that's what we have to think about. I don't have a good answer. I think we have to work on it collectively, but we also have to recognize that his ship has largely sailed, because we have implemented a plan by zoning and annexing properties that we now need to move forward with. Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Woman Strader. Strader: Thank you. Just a couple quick ones. Can you -- and I realize sort of a sensitive topic. Can you talk a little bit more about your recreation user and more from the concern — I am concerned about what that could be if that's going to become a regional draw what -- what that could look like. I don't know if you could talk around it generally, just kind of wanted to open that up, so you can weigh in on it. Wardle: I don't think it's a regional draw. I think it's a recreation user that -- that focuses on, you know, a neighborhood -- a neighborhood draw. I can't get real specific, but you can see there that they contemplate a pool and a large -- a large facility and some pickleball courts and it is a -- a private recreational operator. Strader: Okay. Okay. And, then, just one more thing -- and I feel like, you know, some of the challenges here -- you are correct. This was -- these properties were annexed; Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 27 of 56 right. At the same time I think -- I think part of what is a little bit of a headwind in this case is that you have a very large development. In many ways I am one of the types of people that would rather have this broken into digestible pieces. I feel like because you are coming out the gate already addressing a lot of high level concerns that sort of kept you from maybe just focusing on the project, I do want to give you an opportunity to take like maybe two minutes just to talk about the highlights and the things that you think this adds to the community, just because I feel like the way that these hearings are playing out it -- you kind of come across on the defensive by nature of the testimony and everything. So, I do want to give you a chance to talk about the positives, because think, you know, we are going to hear public testimony and -- yeah. Wardle: Well, Council President, Council Member Strader, I'm going to take 15 seconds and, then, I'm going to invite Tonn Peterson, because part of the problem here is being the attorney you were in the weeds on the technical issues. So, as to your comment about wanting to see it in digestible pieces, recognize that you will be seeing elements in digestible pieces, that this is the development agreement for the entire site and, you know, I have had criticisms of other big projects I brought in where people are like, well, we would really like to see this piecemeal. Well, great. If you want to see it piecemeal recognize that there are elements and things you don't get. Strader: Council President Cavener? Cavener: Please. Strader: Yeah. I want all the things. Wardle: Yeah. Strader: So, like I actually want both. Wardle: You want both. But it's like -- if -- if the five properties that are subject to these five separate development agreements came in individually you do not get the collector in phase one. There is federal mechanism — no mechanisms. Strader: I don't think we want to start a debate, because I was a debater in college and do love to engage in that, but let's not -- I -- I -- I love that we are getting a high level view, which I think is appropriate for a planned development of this size. I just think, you know, it couldn't hurt to have an effort to sell us on what does this add to the community; right? Like just really high level. What does this add to the community positive for — Wardle: Well, I'm going to invite Tonn to come up and -- and do that so that we are not just dealing with -- Strader- Perfect. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 28 of 56 Cavener: Tonn, you want to come up here and at least introduce your name and address for the record, please. And the time is yours, sir. Peterson: Yes. Thank you so much. Council, Tonn Peterson. 1144 South Silverstone Way. I'm the chief development officer and legal counsel for -- for Ahlquist. I'm so excited to answer that question, because I couldn't agree more. Council — Council Woman Strader, this is — this is the moment I have been waiting for. It feels a little bit like we have been on the defensive, just because of the nature of what we are dealing with. Let me answer your question directly. So, if you can imagine we have been -- we have been focused on nine additional acres of -- of residential, but this is a 200 acre development that will be the -- the crowning jewel of everything we do and potentially for Meridian. This is walkable retail and restaurant. This is a destination where you can in a truly mixed-use environment you can work, live and play and we slapped that label on everything; right? You see it all over. But this is it. This is the -- the example of it where you can -- you can work there -- I want to just mention that moving from south up from -- yeah. There we go. So, starting down along 1-84 -- just to put this into context, the jobs and the employment we are bringing here -- and we mentioned this at P&Z. If you can picture in your mind our Eagle View Landing development where Topgolf is, we will have more square footage of office at this park than we will Eagle View Landing. This is an office park where we are going to have opportunities to bring in employment. That cannot be overstated. As -- and it won't be the same as Ten Mile Crossing, it won't be the same as Eagle View Landing, it will have its own identity. But for context we will be -- we will have more square footage -- over 500,000 square feet of office -- true office in this development. Then as you are moving up, as you get closer to -- to Franklin you will have medical office, you will have the -- the ancillary and much needed hotel and hospitality that's going to really benefit those and that -- especially that medical office community, when you think about going under the underpass and connecting with -- with Ten Mile Crossing and the medical offices are there, this is going to be a cohesive medical office destination. Then — and we have called it Innovator, we have called it Bellagio, it's the collector -- whatever that might be. Then you get truly into the neighborhood retail-restaurant feel. Our partner on this development is EPC, the principles of whom are the former CEO and his executive team with CenterCal, who brought Meridian The Village. They are helping us. Their fingerprints are all over this — to learn from what they did in the past. There is some good things. It's not just The Village that they have done, but they have done those types of developments all over the western United States and all of that they have learned and right before retirement they said let's do it, taking all the lessons learned and do it right here. It's walkable. It's scalable. It's -- it's entertainment oriented that a family can come down and spend the time going through the -- the micro parks, the playgrounds, going to a movie, perhaps, you know, eating at a restaurant, having entertainment and perhaps walking back to their home. But whatever it is it's a neighborhood feel that's really really -- and -- and -- and I wish we could and I would probably -- Tom Ahlquist would come running in here if I started telling you, you know, who we have under contract, but it is -- it is going to be just the absolute paramount project that we have where the highest end retailers are coming in and bringing it, so that we have -- we are not now going I think that solves the traffic problem in part. We are not being on the road to go to -- to -- to The Village; Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 29 of 56 right? On this side of Meridian you can stay here. We have a collector system that we work through that goes from Ten Mile over to Black Cat. From Franklin you can take Umbria down and go over to Ten Mile Crossing. So, I hope that provides some answer to the question to really bring this to life of what this development is. There are nine additional acres of residential, but that is largely, you know, shadowed by the -- the almost 190 acres of true office -- medical office, hospitality, retail and restaurant that this site will bring in, all of which has been zoned accordingly and we are mixing those zones to fit. I will say in conclusion I cannot say how much we appreciate staff. I cannot even -- there is no way to comprehend -- we have worked in countless meetings with them for 18 months and we agree with the recommendation. It gets us to the same place and we think that it's a great recommendation that they have made and we are appreciative of them and we are appreciative of you for this process. I stand for questions. Cavener: Thank you. Council, any questions? Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: I have just one quick question. Speaking about the -- the office space and kind of describing that. In the staff report it talks about desire to have a variety of flexible spaces for small, local or start-up businesses, in addition to some of the larger regional enterprise entities. Could you speak to like what your vision is to kind of encourage or promote those types of environments or is it just -- you will make the office space, let people lease it, along that lines. I'm just kind of curious the variety of office space that you are envisioning being at this location. Peterson: Yeah. Council Member Taylor, and -- and -- and, Council, wonderful question, and the way to answer that is to look at our past history on that exact point. If you look across the street or you drive down the street to Eagle View Landing you will see we have big national tenants. You will also see Kiln, for example. You will see -- you will see the more kind of not mom and pop, but the -- the -- the grassroots. That's what our buildings are filled with. There is this mix that our team has -- you know, long before I joined -- I'm an attorney by trade and in the five years I have -- I have -- I have learned some of this, but our team -- if you go just -- just across the street to Ten Mile Crossing and look at the tenant mix that's what you will see. You need those big anchor tenants to -- to bring the building online and, then, there is a deliberate path to bring in the -- the local businesses, the startups and -- and, really, if you look at, you know, Travis Hawkes and what he is doing across at -- at Ten Mile Crossing -- and that's a perfect example and that's -- that's our bread and butter, that's our pathway, that's our business model what you have just described. Strader: Council President Cavener? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 30 of 56 Strader: How -- how are you -- how will this be positioned relative to The Village? You don't have to speak to that, I mean that's really your inner workings, but I'm curious. And you don't have to talk about it, but if you want to -- I mean there is a concern about whether this town could sort of support two large lifestyle centers, whatever you want to call it, kind of in close proximity to one another. So, just curious how -- how this would be positioned in light of that? Peterson: Yeah. Thank you very much. So, Council, another really good question that -- that I'm glad I have the opportunity to speak on. The -- the public comment last time was a real good one. I probably would have made it myself. The question being are we just building another Village? Is this Village 2.0? The answer is no. It has design elements. It has functionality. Lessons learned from those who have done it before. It has an integration component. In other words, those -- the -- the brainchilds of -- of who were able to do The Village are able to say this is what it can look like, but by no means are we trying to either compete with or -- or create an alternative -- a 2.0 version. That's -- that's never been the -- the -- the design and I would -- I would be happy to — to tour our site with anyone from the public to be able to demonstrate to them this is a much larger site. It can't be that. By definition and by -- by default it simply can't be that. But what it can do is it can provide integration, it can provide walkability, it can provide the same family feel, the same safety environment where someone says I -- I live here and now I don't -- I don't necessarily need to go to Nampa to Boise, because I have restaurant, I have retail, I have -- you know, I have fitness alternatives that I can go to and -- and so I hope that also answers your question, that we are -- we are taking the best of what the lessons have been learned and incorporating that in a much different and separate and distinct development. And -- and I would also add that the main -- the main difference being that this is the anchor of it. I mean literally from a physical standpoint the anchor of it along 1-84 is a business park and so it has by -- by just that own definition a very distinct feel to it. Cavener: Council, any additional questions? Tonn, I have got a couple. Maybe -- or Mr. Wardle and, one, I appreciate your passion and enthusiasm for the project from both of you. It's very infectious. But I think my question boils down to something that I learned from staff this evening, which was that there was at least -- at least initially contemplated a collaborative effort for a regional traffic impact plan -- traffic impact study and I didn't get quite a clear answer from our staff as to why that -- why that process never began, because I will speak to it. You touched on what I think is the big crux for me. I actually think this is going to function like a -- like a mixed-use regional location; right? You said it. Families are going to come down here. I think families not just that living around the area, but families from across Meridian, across the valley, Kuna, Star are going to be attracted to this area and so to me it's looking at because this is now going to be the critical mass for traffic impacts across the valley, right there at the -- you know, the -- at your location at 8:00 and 9:00 in the morning when people are trying to get off the Interstate and there, again, at 5:00 and 6:00 when people are trying to get home, so why not take a look at how this project would impact a more regional approach to traffic, so that Council can feel confident when Mr. Wardle says, hey, with Linder Road overpass you are going to see relief. With Highway 16 you are Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 31 of 56 going to see relief. And how we contemplate that with kind of to your point some of the big users are going to come two or three years from now. I don't anticipate traffic's going to get any better necessarily in a measurable way in those two or three years, so that -- I think that for me is my big hang up is trying to understand how the additional transportation investments that the city and the county and the state are making, how those are going to be impacted by this project -- not by this project as well as ongoing users. I realize that's a lot to throw at you at 8:00 o'clock at night, but it's a piece that for me I -- I continue to wrestle with. Peterson: Thank you, Council President and Council. I think the most pertinent question of the night has just been -- been asked and I -- and I can answer that. I applaud ACHD. The reason that we don't need a traffic study is because we have their staff report that probably gives us more than a traffic study would. ACHD has not required a traffic study. What they have is they have given us a 30 page report that six months from now when we get the first draft back and another six months from now when we get it approved -- because that's how long it's taking -- we would have exactly what we have now. Ten Mile has been built out. Franklin's been built out. The Ten Mile -- excuse me -- the -- I can't see a thing without my glasses. Ten Mile has been built out. Franklin has been built out. We have the Highway 16 overpass program, the Linder over -- overpass program. We have a collector system that we have already started on that would be in a traffic study. ACHD would say, hey, we need -- we need connectivity between Ten Mile and Black Cat and that's why 18 months ago working with staff and ACHD we said we will go procure that land now and we will start on it, because we know it's going to be needed. We know that collector would be required from Umbria to go -- excuse me -- from Franklin that taking Umbria down to Ten Mile that would be required by ACHD and they would require the -- the signal warrant analysis at all three -- analyses at all three locations. In other words, we have got it. We have the entirety and the totality of it. I applaud -- and -- and as Mr. Wardle had indicated, we are in full agreement with the staff report that was generated through 18 months worth of work with staff, ACHD and us. I would -- I would venture to tell you — and based on the work that we have done with ACHD and other jurisdictions, both in Meridian and Boise, more work has gone into this analysis than when we get a full traffic study and — and I think the reason that ACHD has said we don't -- we don't actually need a traffic study, because they had one, they have a base traffic study from 2007, that was a base model, so it's already been done and Mindy Wallace and others have said, well, these are the things, A, B, C, the ones I just went through, that we are going to need. So, we don't need another traffic study to tell us that, let's work on doing those things and we said absolutely, let's do those things for the betterment of our project and the betterment of the community. Cavener: Tonn, I guess it's less about Ten Mile and Franklin and your collector, it's also about the interstate and to me I think that -- that is an important piece. I mean that's where I really mean that you guys are kind of Ground Zero for traffic and -- and I would like to go back and look at the — at the staff report. I was kind of under the impression that ACHD didn't require a traffic impact study, because there was maybe some miscommunication with the highway district and the city about if we thought one was Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 32 of 56 needed or not. So, that if we can -- if we need to take a break for it a little bit, too. I'm -- I'm fine. Those are just -- I just want to be up front with you. Those are the things that I -- I'm struggling to be able to overcome. Wardle: Council President Cavener, having been in those meetings -- and, again, I'm not here to argue with you guys. I'm not here to debate. But the fact of the matter is ACHD, ITD and your staff and us were there at the table 15, 16 months ago and where I get frustrated with the public agencies in this valley is it is not for the private property owners to drag them to the table, force them to cooperate, so we can go forward -- so that we can move forward with the rights that we already have. Also what's disconcerting and what is really aggravating at this site with respect to ITD is where was ITD when you approved Ten Mile Center across the street doing the exact same thing, integrating these development agreements and taking what had been approved conceptually and turning them into one master plan? It's disconcerting that property owners get pitted against each other to see who gets first to the market with their building permit, so that they are the ones that don't have to do these things. So, I don't disagree, Council Member Cavener, these are legitimate concerns, but we as the developer, as the property owner, who have been working with your staff, it is not for us to compel ITD to do its evaluation. It's not for us to compel ITD to think about its interstate highways. It's not for us to compel you to stop development elsewhere. Because the fact of the matter is with commercial uses what do we know? Commercial uses are uses where people come to work, shop, do the other things. They serve the houses. The reason that commercial always comes later is because you have to have that massive housing and what we see over and over and over again in this valley is municipalities approve housing and, then, when the commercial developers and commercial users and commercial property owners come forward everybody rings their hands and goes, oh, we have got to deal with traffic. We pay impact fees too. We are going to contribute those impact fee dollars. We get exacted just like a residential developer, but the fact of the matter is that that -- that main -- that main commercial collector — if this were in north Meridian and we were talking about a director or a producer, you know, those collectors in -- in Paramount or over -- some of the other projects, those types of collectors would be much smaller. Those would be residential collectors that have a narrower profile and don't have the stuff. So -- so, this is one where we sat there in the meetings, we had the conversations and, you know, I'm not just dumping on your staff and your city, because I have seen it elsewhere. I have seen the city of Boise go, oh, ACHD, we need to do this. Great. We as the development community will be here to help you, but you have to lead, because you can't put the cost in terms of dollars and time back on developers who have — and property owners who have property that's zoned. If it's annexed I get it. If it's not annexed I get it. You know, hold off until you get there, but these were decisions that were made. So, if ITD needs to stop parachuting in on individual single projects where they go, oh, you are going to need that -- because the other thing, too, is that when we deal with these types of development applications ITD's mitigation requirements are wholly inconsistent with what you as a municipality recognize are constitutional limits of exactions and ACHD, ITD has no qualms whatsoever of taking your traffic study and go, you know, you really need to go do something off site that serves these, not people who are coming to you Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 33 of 56 but solves their problems, so -- I mean Council President, I understand the concern, because you get the phone calls, you get the phone calls, where he goes, oh, the traffic is bad. But what is level — it is. But it's level of service F and if we want better than level of service F, then, our agencies have -- and municipalities can't approve all the projects you have approved. That's the consequence is that you -- when we come in trying to implement the plans that municipalities adopt, we can't get crucified for doing what we were told you wanted. Cavener: Mr. Wardle, in -- in fairness Ten Mile doesn't just serve Meridian residents, it serves Star, it serves Middleton, it serves Emmett, it serves many other cities. So, we also are taking the growth and the decisions of other cities. We are in that position where we have to make a decision what's best for our community and deal with all the other traffic impacts and all the other traffic decisions of other municipalities and to say we have made these decisions is yes, but that does not mean that we should continue to make other decisions that could continue to drive up the major challenges of traffic, not just in our community, in the region. So, I hear what you are saying and I -- and agree with you, quite frankly, on a lot of it and I would be incredibly frustrated to get a letter from ITD 24 hours before you -- before us to say, hey, by the way, a traffic impact study is probably warranted. Would have been nice to have heard that 16 months ago -- six months ago. Wardle: Absolutely. They were at the table, we had the conversations and if they wanted to have that fight -- and that's why I don't really want to talk about the ITD, you know, request for a traffic study, because where have they been? We have done what you have asked. We have done what your plan says. We have done what your staff has asked. We have done what ACHD asked us to. And at the 11th hour and 59th minute, after we have worked through all of this stuff, ITD comes and goes you got to solve our problem. Well, I totally agree. I agree we have problems and, you know what the problems are, the problems are people move here and we have no way of really capturing that new growth. Everybody that moves here from Arizona and California we don't have a way to do that. We don't have a way that those of us that have lived in this community and paid the taxes and done this, don't have to stop at Franklin. Why? Because the newly arrived person from Scottsdale who is here as a political refugee, you know, wants it better and, then, what do they do? They complain about traffic. You don't get it both ways and -- you know. And not to -- not to be abrasive and take it out on you, but the fact of the matter is they all show up, they all want big nice new houses out there and, then, they complain, well, where is the retail? Where is the commercial? You know. And we have got to deliver that. And so I don't disagree -- I do disagree with the fact that when you are bold enough to come in and go, okay, we are going to take five development agreements and put them together that we get held to a higher standard, because, unfortunately, when you do that -- we do and everybody goes, oh, that -- okay. Great. The four acre parcel here will come in and you know what you are going to get with the four acre parcel that's not part of a larger development agreement? You are going to get a Fast Eddies and a car wash. That's what you are going to get, you know. That's the consequence of these decisions. That's the consequence of what are you going to get? You are going to get a little Mattress Firm anchored strip center Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 34 of 56 like the one down between Franklin and the train tracks on Eagle Road. That's what you get. And what causes worse traffic? All of those separate curb cuts and all of those, you know, uninter -- interconnected parking lots and all of those little property owners that, you know, take umbrage when you tell them that you have to provide connectivity to your neighbor and they are here yelling at you about that, not recognizing that there is a benefit to that -- that connectivity. Cavener: Mr. Wardle, I don't think anybody comes and yells. I think people like you and I bring enthusiasm for the things that we care about. I don't think you are yelling at us tonight either. So, I appreciate your passion and enthusiasm. Any other questions for Mr. Wardle? All right. Thank you. Wardle: Thank you. Cavener: All right. Council, it is now the public hearing portion. Mr. Johnson, do we have anyone signed up to provide testimony this evening? Johnson: Mr. President, we do. First is Heather Christensen. Cavener: Heather, if you would join us up here. You can pick either microphone. Sometimes you got to eat it a little bit, but you have three minutes. If you could start by introducing your name and your address for the record. Christensen: Thank you. My name is Heather Christensen. I live at 1469 North Deep Creek Way, Meridian, Idaho. 83642. 1 would just like to start off with something that the applicant said was the ship has sailed. But as you and I all know, the Titanic did sink and it was the unsinkable Titanic. This actually directly impacts me and my family and my community. So, as a citizen I would like the traffic study, because I live there and I drive there. I have to drive from the interstate up to Cherry. My house lives just down the street from Fuller Park and from Chaparral. I see the traffic, I see people cut into our neighborhood all the time off of Ten Mile trying to get past the Ten Mile intersection on Cherry and Ten Mile. I feel like a lot of tonight has been focusing on people we are trying to get here and not the people that live here. So, I don't think ITD is too late. I think that study would be very helpful for the residents that live here. I'm not opposed to growth. My husband and I have a small business. It's a family-owned business that we run and we serve all of Treasure Valley. So, my husband's constantly traveling, our employees are constantly traveling. I feel like the thing that drew us to Meridian was that it was a community about families. It was a community that was -- had this small feel and we focused on keeping it that way. We focus it on community, family oriented, and I feel like this district -- I know that it's already been decided that this district is going forward, but I feel like we could still change direction on the district. I feel like our focus should be more on what things the citizens and the residents that already live here need. I have a daughter who struggles with mental health and we do not have any facilities in Idaho that have -- in residential places for these teens that go into mental hospitals. So, we have mental hospitals, but we have nothing in our community that serves teens and children that struggle with mental health outside of the hospital and Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 35 of 56 so, then, we have parents who struggle figuring out what to do and in our case we sent our daughter down to Utah. I feel like as a community and if we are going to do a district I feel like it should focus on what the needs are. We don't need more shopping. Most of the residents that live in our area we have what we need. We have a Costco down the street. We have a Walmart across the freeway and up the street. We have Winco. We have everything we need. We have hospitals within like just miles of us. We have office buildings everywhere. But I think things that we could focus on are things that could help our community. Is that my time? Cavener: If you could wrap up your comments and, then, if Council has any questions for you. Christensen: That's pretty much what I -- I feel like we could focus on. If you want something where people can eat, live and play I feel like we could do a -- a -- like a residential place for seniors who are trying to go into retirement, like a senior living area for like 55 and older. We could do a pond where like there could be like places for people to go around. It doesn't have to be set in stone, the district. It could be changed. I know it's going in, but I think that if we could redirect it it could help both traffic and it could help the residents that already live in this area. Cavener: Thank you for your testimony. Council, any questions? Heather, I thank you for being here this evening. Mr. Johnson. Johnson: Mr. President, Colin Ronard. Cavener: Colin, welcome this evening. If you would, please, state your name and address for the record, the time is yours, sir. Ronard: Good evening, Council. Colin Ronard. 332 North Broadmore Way. I'm with Ardura. We are working on engineering with the -- with the applicant. If the only thing I say tonight is I just want to again thank staff. Ardura, has worked directly on this project since 2019. Bill and Sonya at planning have been awesome to work with. Bruce in Public Works. I extend that thanks to ACHD, Mindy in planning, Casey in engineering and all those folks down there that have been awesome. I'm here to stand in to us -- or stand to answer any engineering specific questions you may have. I know that a lot's been discussed, so if anything -- if I don't say anything else I just wanted to thank staff. Cavener: Thank you. Council, any questions? Thank you, sir. Appreciate it. Mr. Johnson. Johnson: Mr. President, online we have Natalie Purcell. Natalie, I'm allowing you to unmute. Oh, you are here. Well, I'm so sorry. I'm glad you are here. Cavener: Real quick as Ms. Purcell is making her way up here, I think it's important to note for the record Ms. Purcell's son and his Jaguars football team ran a clinic on my son and his team on Saturday. I haven't talked to legal, but I feel I can remain impartial. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 36 of 56 But it's nice to have you here this evening, Ms. Purcell. If you could state your name and address for the record at the time. Purcell: Thank you. Natalie Wixom Purcell. 3848 West Park Creek Drive. So, I think this last week and this week we have heard some comments about -- from the citizens of Meridian expressing concern about the high density housing developments that have occurred on Ten Mile. Drawing attention to the Council's ongoing approvals and continued exceptions that have allowed over 300 high density housing to already be built or approved in that area. This doesn't count the thousand more that are currently in Planning and Zoning this week and next week. So, there is up to 4,000 already to be set to be approved. By allowing this over building of one housing type we have been pointed out that this has deviated from the city's master plan. My concerns began about a year and a half ago as I witnessed an influx of apartments being constructed and towering over our cities and neighborhoods and schools, all while our commute times increased substantially, our parks were overflowing and our students class sizes kept growing. I went to the school -- Chaparral actually — and I said, hey, there is all these new apartments right across the street. Literally their balconies look over into my children's playground, which is another safety concern. We can talk about it at a different time. And I said what's the plan? And they said when you find out let us know. We would love to know. So, I reached out to the City of Meridian. I reached out to Council Members, I reached out to the Mayor and I met with Mayor Simison and I met with the school board and I hate to say that I found that Meridian schools were not in the top priority for any one of those. As members -- and as citizens of Meridian the quality of life was not in any of these considerations as high density housing overtook our town. I would like to point out that we just had a perfect example of where the developer stands on our school as he said, quote, it's not a big deal that our schools are over capacity. He had the chart up with my son's school, my daughter's school, and said it's fine as it's over capacity. I had -- he had 37 kids in his class. Is that the education that we want to provide for Meridian citizens? We just showed and had the attitude of what is happening in Idaho and what the developers think about our children's educational environments. In recent years it seems that the needs of developers have taken precedent over the well-being of Meridian citizens. Education has taken a back burner in our city's planning and our children are now the collateral damage. We have had flippant comments from City Council Members saying, quote, the schools will do what they always do and figure it out and, quote, as they approve high density housing that are overburdening our schools, our streets and our parks. The schools just figuring it out for my family as I have stated is 37 kids in my son's fifth grade classroom educational quality is dropping, overworked and overburdened educators. The developers nonchalantly like to point out that it's not that big of a deal. It's just a few acres. It's not going to add that much. But for my family it is a big deal. My son attended Chaparral from kindergarten through 5th grade. I have two more kids there and I will have another one there in a year. So, it is a big deal for us and our family and the educational environment for my children. It's -- I will just wrap this up. Homeowners who have been here for years and help build a quality of life are being stripped away from their city acre by acre as more exemptions are made. It doesn't matter if it's nine acres he says. It matters to me and it matters to my family. We need answers to roads. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 37 of 56 It's not okay for the answer to be it's going to stay at an F for a while when you are talking about my commute times. The parks will have some green space. That will be enough. Is that going to help alleviate the problems that we have with sports teams trying to find practice areas or our neighborhoods being overflow parking every evening and every weekend? No. And schools being over capacity, that is not okay. It is not okay for someone to get up here and say that's not a big deal. That is. That's our children. That is the educational environment we are providing and for them to say it is not a big deal it's not okay. So, what we need is we need to create communities where residents want to build in and buy in and be here for the long haul. We don't need these stop in shops where they go live there for a little while and, then, transient move somewhere else. We need to build communities where we are building strong ties, where we are building places where we want our kids to go to school, where we want to go to the parks and we are not being overburdened and we are not telling us that it doesn't matter. It's only nine acres. It does matter. Thank you for your consideration. Cavener: Thank you, Ms. Purcell. Any -- any questions from Council? Natalie, I — oh, go ahead, Council Member Strader, if you have a question. Strader: Natalie, I just -- I want to make sure I heard tonight -- your testimony tonight was that your son is one of 37 kids in his classroom? Purcell: There was 37 kids in his 5th grade class at Chaparral last year. They lost their computer lab. I -- I could go on for hours about this, but they currently don't have an OT room. They do occupational therapy for students that need help in the hallways and I would like to point out -- they have to pay zero impact fees to our schools. So, it does matter, because I get to pay for this development. It's my property taxes that go up to pay for new schools, not them. They don't have to pay anything in Idaho. Zero. I have to pay for this development. Cavener: Thank you, Natalie. Council, any additional questions? Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: I appreciate your passion and I share that passion for my children and -- and I know all of us do. I am curious. So, your number one concern is students' education or building of apartments. If this application did not include any residential component would you still be opposed to it? Purcell: Until traffic was looked at, yes. I think that we could easily wait until Highway 16 was in place and, then, do a traffic study and if it's no longer enough I would probably support something that did not include residential. But if they cannot prove to me that my commute times wouldn't get longer, no, I wouldn't then. Strader: That's helpful. Thank you. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 38 of 56 Cavener: Natalie, just for I think your own benefit -- and, again, I have been guilty of more than one time of, you know, caring maybe too much up here and so I appreciate your enthusiasm around this work. I do think it's important to know you have got Council Members with kids in West Ada. We are all neighbors. We are all part of this community and I hope you have seen at least in some of your conversations with Council in here tonight we take applications large and small seriously and we do look at the impacts in our classrooms, on our streets and roads, on our parks, on our Police, on Fire and so I know that sometimes we get to look at just one application before us, but just, if anything, I want you to know that this is a Council of people who -- it's different than maybe the councils of the past where we have got kids in our schools and we are driving on these streets and roads. I — I am a contributor; right? I live in south Meridian and my son goes to school in north Meridian and so I'm -- I'm on Ten Mile, which in one sense I contribute, but in the other sense I -- I see the challenges that you see in your neck of the woods as well. So, I appreciate you being here and sharing your feedback with us this evening. Purcell: No. I appreciate that and I just would like you guys to consider that it's going to be the citizens your constituent needs, not Tommy Ahlquist and I hope you take that into consideration, that it's your constituents and the citizens of Meridian that need to be answered to and it's not Tommy -- Tommy's project, if it's not going to contribute to our community, if it's going to be worse for our constituent -- for your constituents, it's going to be worse for our community, for our roads, for our schools, for our parks. Is it better for Meridian? It's not. Cavener: Thank you. Purcell: Thank you. Cavener: Mr. Johnson, anyone else on our list? Johnson: Mr. President, you have Ryan Manwaring online. Ryan, you should be able to unmute yourself. Cavener: Ryan, good evening. If you can hear us, please, state your name and address for the record and you have three minutes to provide public testimony to the Council. Manwaring: Thank you. Ryan Manwaring, registered agent, address of 784 South Clearwater Loop, Suite D. 83854. Thank you so much. Can you hear me okay? Cavener: I can hear you great, Ryan. Thank you. Manwaring: All right. Thanks. Yeah. I -- thank you. I appreciate what Ms. Wixom Purcell and Ms. Christensen said. I agree with them. I'm a healthcare provider in Meridian, I -- and I also see some other concerns about the infrastructure here. Do you guys know what the -- the per capita income of Meridian is? Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 39 of 56 Cavener: So, Mr. Manwaring — Manwaring: Yes. Cavener: -- typically in a -- in a public testimony we don't necessarily get -- we want you to be able to use your full three minutes to your full capacity and so if that is a question that you would like us to maybe answer and address at the end of your testimony I think probably we would be able to provide that, but I would just hate that you would give up your three minutes to -- to ask some of these questions, if maybe you want to speak what's a little more germane to your testimony this evening. Manwaring: All right. Well, I hope that that -- statistics like that have gone into this decision, but this number, judging -- looking off census records, if you Google it you are going to get the median income and that's not an accurate representation, because a median is very -- it becomes very swayed when we have a lot of affluent people moving in here from out of state, which -- which has been happening and so when you are -- when the median income moves farther and farther from that per capita income, we see this rift and it's concerning that we are seeing that in Meridian. So, per capita we are looking at around 54,000 per year of income and so it's hard to imagine how the -- if that's the per capita income how -- how this meets the needs of existing residents, which is the wording in the Comprehensive Plan that all the development needs to -- to keep that in mind, meeting the needs of existing residents, our existing residents are going to be able to, you know, afford -- like I just don't see affordable housing in this mix here. I guess it depends on what your -- your definition of that, but I'm saying what -- I'm saying what all the stuff that's going in this is not affordable for a lot of the situations that, you know, I'm working with. I'm concerned about the development really outpacing infrastructure and I know when you look at infrastructure there is a lot of talk about traffic, but we don't talk enough about schools when they are calculating that, like actually planning and putting numbers into schools like Ms. Purcell was stating. There is also some other indicators we can look at that says like we are setting Meridian up for failure. So, if you have ever been to a food bank in Meridian I would encourage you to get out like -- like maybe try and learn or -- or show up to one of these, kind of get an idea of -- see how long this line is wrapping around a building, because when finance -- when -- when this group of -- you know, when a per capita income of 54 grand a year, you know, residents are really already stressed out and when we get an influx of even more people coming in from out of state to live in these residences, they are also taking up resources, like healthcare providers, you know, some of them food banks. We have to -- and a lot of these people kind of get pushed out of their other areas of service. So, we got to look like, you know, food banks which are already really strained. Another thing that's strained is domestic violence resource centers in this area, all under a lot of pressure. Like we don't have the resources to support development. We have to make sure that the infrastructure is — it has -- is accelerating. Cavener: Great. Thank -- thank you. Mr. Manwaring. Council, any questions? Mr. Manwaring, I -- I do have one for you, because you -- you provided I guess a unique perspective. Is it your testimony that you feel the Council should be opposed to this Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 40 of 56 change because the -- the economics of our region couldn't support a development of this kind? Manwaring: Yes. Cavener: Great. Thank you. I appreciate that. And just for your own well-being you have got a couple Council Members that are up here that are former Meridian Food Bank board members and -- and active Meridian Food Bank volunteers. So, I think we bring a good perspective as to what's occurring in our community and just want to share that with you for your own well-being. Manwaring: Thank you. Thank you for serving there. Cavener: Thank you for your testimony this evening. Mr. Johnson, is there anyone else that is signed to testify? Johnson: President Cavener, that's everyone. Cavener: All right. Is there anybody in the room that hasn't had an opportunity to provide public testimony that would like to do so at this time? Okay. Council, here is what I would like to do. We have -- we had a full workshop and a full executive and a couple hours of very spirited testimony and conversations. I would like to take a ten minute recess, give people an opportunity to get a drink of water and check in with your families and, then, we will reconvene -- how about at 8:25 to give the applicant an opportunity to respond? We are at recess. (Recess: 8:15 p.m. to 8:25 p.m.) Cavener: Come back from recess. Mr. Wardle, you want to come back up? Got an opportunity to provide a response, some of the feedback and questions you have heard this evening. You have got ten minutes. The time is yours, sir. Wardle: Thanks. Mr. President, Members of Council, I want to start by clarifying something that was really important. You know, my dad attended West Ada schools back in Meridian School District back in the day. Two-thirds of my children graduated from Rocky Mountain High School in those classes with 40 kids when -- before Owyhee got built, taking that pressure off. One hundred percent of Tommy Ahlquist's children were educated in the West Ada School District. A hundred percent of the management team at Ahlquist's children are educated in the West Ada School District. Now, I no longer live in this fine city. Did for ten years. But when my children graduated, you know, it was time to make some lifestyle decisions and I don't know what our ultimate decision is, but I rented an apartment and my wife and I are happily living in 1 ,400 square feet that is close to my office. I can bike to work. It takes me ten minutes to drive and my house is now ready for another family with three or four or five kids to live in it. Now, Meridian is a community of families and I think we have lost sight on this application that this is really about what does this commercial setting get developed Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 41 of 56 like? And I disagree with some of the comments that were posed, because you know why commercial is so important? Because commercial provides the jobs. The jobs that our kids can work, the jobs that we can work, the jobs that our aunts and uncles and nieces and nephews and cousins can work. Jobs are important and with the Ten Mile specific plan a decision was made at this location at Ten Mile, south of Franklin, that this is going to be a jobs center. Ten Mile center on the other side of the road that we were involved with the Ten Mile Crossing office and -- and medical office is a job center. That's what we do and that's what we contemplate for this site. But what we have to think about is what is a complete community? A complete community is one where everybody who wants to live there can find housing that meets their needs. They can find employment there that meets their needs if they choose to. They can shop and recreate and do those other things in that community. Now, the original Ten Mile master plan -- what was this designated as? Across the street was designated as a lifestyle center and when the decision was made to approve the -- approve The Village there was the acknowledgement that that is your lifestyle center. I mean we certainly are not trying to replicate The Village, but there are lessons that have been learned from the retail team that have done The Village and from the office team that has done Eagle View Landing and Ten Mile Crossing and from our multi-family partners that have advised us on things. So, let's take a step back and, again, start with where we were with this application. You have in front of you a comp plan amendment. Now, if you remember reading at the beginning of my analysis and the lengthy document we put together, I have taken the position that a comp plan amendment is absolutely unnecessary, because your comp plan contemplates a variety of uses within the underlying and that we did that at the request of your staff. Your staff said it would be easier if you came in and asked to modify the comprehensive plan as we go through these development agreements. We acquiesced. Again, I don't think it's necessary, because the underlying zoning and the zoning we request can be consistent with that. We don't have to change the boundaries in the Ten Mile plan of the land use areas, because it's flexible. We can work through it. We can do it. But we have agreed to do that. We have made a couple requests as to changes in zoning. Is there anything nefarious about that? No. It's really driven by three factors. One, the current zoning boundaries do not conform to where the infrastructure is. You know, a zoning boundary ideally is not going to cut through the middle of a parcel, it's going to follow the road or it's going to follow a property line. So, part of the reason that we requested a change in the zoning was to take that -- that C-C, that general commercial, and bring it down to where it connects over, because that makes sense. Then we reconfigure the H-E, because we know that office is important and that's why we are interested in this site. That's why we are involved with this site. So, we reconfigured that. On the west side we take the M-E, which is mixed employment, we are not touching the ten acres to the west where Adler is moving forward with their warehousing element that's come through. But, again, we took that M-E and we go, okay, that was just a line on a map, let's conform it to where the Williams Pipeline is and where the connective roadways are and, then, as we talked with our retail team, the suggestion was made that rather than have Umbria be a hard defining boundary between what's already zoned residential and the existing commercial, that let's go ahead and put residential on both sides of that, so that Umbria functions and looks like a residential collector for the benefit of those Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 42 of 56 property owners to the north. So, that's what we have done. At the end of the day -- and, then, yes, there is a change. We did ask for some C-G, because there are some C-G uses that have been brought to us that it's kind of that M-E, H-E use, but it just doesn't quite fit. So, that's why we said, okay, let's reconfigure this just for there. But at the end of the day the property is already zoned C-G, TN-C, H-E and M-E. So, that's what we are asking. That's where we are talking. Now, I disagree that this is high density residential, because your comp plan and the zoning designations that we are talking about here are less than 12 units to the acre. That is not high density residential. That's a medium density residential. Now, we know -- and from the hearings we have heard people are really uptight and upset about the prospect of more multi-family residential. But the thing I would point out is who lives in multi-family residential? My Air Force pilot son lives in multi-family residential in Spokane, Washington. My registered nurse daughter who works at the University of Utah Behavioral Health Hospital lives in multi-family residential. My college son lives in a townhouse that's a condominium that we purchased so that our children could have a place to stay and we didn't have to deal with the college things. So, every single member of my family are residents of multi-family zoned properties. Now, multi-family is important because it provides a degree of flexibility. It provides the opportunity for the family or the young professional that moves here to come start the job, figure out what you are going to do. I don't know what my wife and I are going to do, but we will figure that out at some point in the future, but that's why we have multi-family and what's proposed here is for a density that provides for townhouses. It's something else. It's not high rises, it's not projects, it's not those things. Now, I want to circle back to schools, because I apologize if people think that I minimized the issues and concerns of the Meridian School District, because I didn't. The West Ada School District -- we know the struggle. You are here regularly. I'm here regularly. My firm has been heavily involved in helping the Meridian School District and you all get to this point. That's why we have it. And when we look at this site at full maximum build out we could theoretically add 50 kids and if all 50 kids were age seven and in one class together that would be problematic. But that's not what happens. There is a variety of those ages and I agree I was the author of the 20 -- of the 2002 amendments to the impact fee statute and people have come back to me and go shouldn't we add schools and I go I don't have any qualms if you add schools. Add schools if you do a capital improvement plan and you are a high growth district and you want to charge impact fees, great. But I want to point out that no one pays impact fees for schools. How do we fund schools in Idaho? We fund schools through property tax levies and who pays property tax? Every single property owner, residential or commercial. The difference is on the commercial side there is no homeowners exemption. So, we will be contributing to schools. We have educated our children here. We value this community. Before you you have a series of what are unnecessarily complicated applications, because at the end of the day we are talking about how do we take a zoning decision that was made years ago and make it better. We are amenable to all the conditions that staff has recommended and we are amenable to the revised solution that staff has identified of changing the zoning and changing the land use plan to match theirs. We get to the same place. We ask for your approval. Thank you. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 43 of 56 Cavener: Thank you, Mr. Wardle. Council, questions for the applicant? Seeing none, Mr. Wardle, but I would not move too far. I'm sure something may pop up -- you are welcome to sit down, but, Council, I may at least suggest perhaps some questions for staff, maybe some deliberation before we close the public hearing in case you need to invite the applicant or anyone else up for some subject matter expertise. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: It's probably a staff question for Bill. Comment was made during some of the testimony about 4,000 units having been approved within the immediate area and I was looking at the staff report and all these wonderful colors and graphs that I have been asking for and if I understand it correctly just within the one mile radius on the existing condition matrix -- I'm trying to make sure I'm understanding the correct area where I would like to look at the units that we have approved within a mile that are not existing but have been approved. Would that be the conditional use permit graph where it says we are about 800 single family and, then, you know, about 2,900 multi-family. Is that the right graph or -- or can you just kind of point me in the right direction? Parsons: Yeah. Mr. President, Members of the Council, Councilman Taylor, that is correct. That's the graph. And keep in mind that that measurement goes from the center line of that section. So, it may not capture quite all of what's already been approved out there, but I can tell you there has been several thousand approved out there. Taylor: And, then, as a follow up, Bill, and I -- I wish maybe -- I was looking through some of the -- the comments in the letter. I was looking to see the -- to understand the impact on the schools with respect to these proposed conditional use permits for the multi-family and -- and single family. Those impacts on the school, because I -- I agree with the argument if we are looking at the matrix of maybe 53 for this, that doesn't seem to be largely concerning. However, I -- what I'm not sure I'm seeing in terms of the data in front of me right now is with those other already approved housing types and the impact on the school, I haven't gone back and looked at all the different letters that West Ada has provided, so is there any way that you could -- we could understand the impacts of all of these units that have yet to be built that have been approved, what that would do to the schools, because I think that's probably the bigger question I have on this application with respect to schools. This particular application doesn't seem to be a dramatic impact, but when you are looking at the cumulative effect within — in close proximity I just can't find that. So, I don't know if you can -- I'm not sure the best way to go about finding that or if that's something that's just going to hang out there as a -- kind of a best guess without actually knowing. I don't know if you can answer that question, Bill. Sorry. Parsons: Council, it's -- it's -- you are correct. The -- the staff report that we do is not a cumulative effect. It's basically we work with the school district. They give us Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 44 of 56 comments on -- on each project. If it's -- so, for example, if this was an all commercial project the school district would be like no comment. We don't have any residential. And in this particular case -- and, then, as you are aware when the school district gives us a letter they base it on the -- the residential units, whether it's multi-family or single family and, then, they use a different factor for the number of children they anticipate based on that land use or that type of dwelling unit. So, historically or typically a multi- family will have less children to -- impact to the school district is what I have experienced than a typical single family. So, that's the best way to answer your question. But yes — and without going to every one of those projects and looking those up and looking at the -- adding those cumulative impacts to you, it would take some time to do that for this evening. But certainly happy to maybe address that with the larger group and see if there is ways that we couldn't incorporate some of that data -- into especially if we know that is a topic that the Council wants us to bring forward and discuss more. Taylor: Yeah. Council President, just to follow up on that, I -- probably a good matrix -- because looking at it in a silo is one thing, but looking at it from the big picture is really important when we are talking about -- about that. So, thank you. Cavener: Bill, just real quick, Council Member Strader, if I may. Bill, to that end -- know I had asked and I know Heather's not here, you are our planning representative tonight, so apologies for putting you on the spot, but Heather was working to get kind of an enrollment total from each school for West Ada with new students. Circumstantially I have been told that it's trending down, particularly when you look at, you know, kindergarten, first grade classes, they are much smaller than what we have seen five or six years ago. Do we know -- has West Ada been able to provide that to us yet? Have they completed that and provided anything? I know it's not necessarily germane to this application, something separate, so I -- I just don't know if we have received anything that's final yet from -- from the district. Parsons: Yeah. Mr. President and Council Members, I -- I don't have an answer for you. I'm not aware of it at this time, but certainly happy to get an update on that and share that with all of you. Cavener: Thank you, Bill. Council, what's your purview then? Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Unless any other Council Members would disagree, maybe I think it would be appropriate to close the public hearing and begin to deliberate, unless you want to leave it open and have some other questions answered. We have already continued one — one meeting. I'm not sure that -- that that's what we want to do, but I'm open to that, making a motion to close the public hearing if -- unless there is some open-ended questions that need to be answered. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 45 of 56 Cavener: Was that a motion? Taylor: Mr. President, I make a motion that we close the public hearing. Overton: Second the motion. Cavener: Motion and second. Any discussion from Council? Seeing none, all in favor say aye. Any no's? All right. The chair is an aye as well and the motion passes. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Since I can see there is a lot -- they are very eager to get started, I will jump in. Very interesting testimony. I appreciate all the applicants that have come. I watched the Planning and Zoning hearing. I watched last week's hearing, because had I missed it, so I do appreciate -- I read all the letters. Probably spent more time for sure on this application than I have any other. Really grappled with this. I have a sister and her three kids that live very very close, so, you know, I have four kids in West Ada. My kids would be impacted by this at Meridian Middle School and Meridian High School, so certainly feels it's really personal in -- in many ways. What I look -- what I see here is -- this is the center of the valley. In my mind I think when we see the way we are growing clearly this Ten Mile area with Highway 16 -- it just seems like it's going to be kind of the center of -- of the Treasure Valley in a lot of respects. So, when I consider that I ask myself the question how do we want to go about developing this? Certainly I have -- I have had a lot of people close to me, talk to me, all the e-mails we have received, I'm just going to kind of go through and address some of the issues that we have all talked about and just share my thoughts. Let me start with the traffic. I actually agree that I think Ten Mile is a funnel for all the other developments in Star, Middleton, even Emmett where we are seeing a lot of growth. If you have been out to Star lately you have seen just a lot of growth. So, I do agree -- I think once Highway 16 is done you are going to see a lot of that pressure coming off -- certainly it -- I -- you know, without a real analysis and study we won't really know what the impact will be when 16 is done. Certainly share your frustrations with ITD and it's -- it's sometimes a very challenging agency to -- to work with or get answers from, but I actually do agree that Highway 16 and Linder overpass is going to alleviate a lot of the pass through traffic that we see north to south to the freeway. I'm still unsettled about whether or not I think that we need a traffic study, kind of a leap of faith to move ahead without one, but it's probably the one issue that I'm not most settled on is whether I think we need to have that first. I want to talk about schools. Again, really appreciate those of you who have come, it's almost 9.00 o'clock, I know it's a lot of time, you have kids at home and certainly appreciate that. think that if we look at just this application only, I don't think it's going to be drastically negatively impacting the schools, because the amount of housing there is not significant. However, the one unanswered question I have is -- I would really like to look Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 46 of 56 at all the approved projects and understand what the impact is. Now, I have been looking at enrollment patterns and the truth is with first graders it -- we were down significantly from where we have been, so -- now that's going to take several years for those impacts to kind of make their way through, but the trend in West Ada is flat to decreasing. That doesn't mean that in the next little bit it's not going to be painful; right? We -- my kids are in the schools right now, so I do -- I live this every day and I understand it. I was really captivated by some of the design standard discussion particularly, because several months ago we had an application where I made the argument that I thought that the Ten Mile plan was outdated. I thought that rejecting the application because of the design standards and not conforming with that didn't make a lot of sense. Now, I also think by approving this application we are kind of handing the keys of the design elements over to the applicant. Now, if we didn't do that and we did just move ahead with it piecemeal, I think what you would find is -- I would actually make the argument we should, then, go back in as a city and update the plan, get it aligned with what we want. So, I'm not opposed to the -- the design standards kind of laid out, I think what we see currently there would certainly inform what we have, but, you know, I think having good partners in the development community and we have seen the good work that's been done, I think there is a high level of confidence that we have an idea what would -- what we would be seeing there. With the housing density, actually agree with what's being proposed. I think we do need a variety of housing in the valley. We are not all single family homeowners. I actually like the transition that you have proposed. I think that actually makes some sense with moving from a heavy commercial and unemployment center to having that transition. I actually like that proposal in this application. I think when you look at the -- you know, Council administrators made this comment a few times about property rights. The properties are going to be developed. If you own the property -- if you are following what's been laid out by the city you are going to develop it. It's going to be developed. So, the question isn't if we are going to allow it to develop, it's how and when. So, with this application I see more of a holistic approach that we are incorporating here. I typically — I'm a little bit concerned about large applications, because there is just so much to consider and certainly there is things that we could overlook accidentally just because of the size of it. But I think what we are going to find is that we are going to get a better development by having this more of a holistic approach here, instead of sort of piecemeal, again, unless we went back in and updated the Ten Mile plan, which would take quite a significant investment of time and resources. So, the compelling question for me is do we have -- this seems a bit more of a coordinated approach to developing what I consider a very unique opportunity in the center of the valley and I -- it's either a coordinated approach or a bit more going back to a piecemeal approach, which I don't really like and I agree with the comment -- I -- I would not approve this project for any one particular person, especially Tommy Ahlquist, but I -- I think tonight I would support this proposal as it's written. I think it makes some sense. I do have a couple of open- ended questions, but I do have a measure of confidence that we will work through some of these challenges, given the time frame it's going to take to actually move ahead with all of the intricacies of this development. So, again, I'm just kind of starting my comments. I may have some more later. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 47 of 56 Cavener: Thank you, Council Member Taylor. Parsons: Council Member -- I'm sorry. Mr. President, Members of the Council, I did find that letter. So, Heather did prepare that document, the cumulative impacts for schools here. So, it's on your screen if you want to take a look at that. So, you can see she is predicting some increases in the area for sure. Taylor: Bill, is that in the staff report or is this a separate — Parsons: Oh. You know, it's under the agency comments. Yeah. So, I wanted to at least get that in front of you and have you digest that. So appreciate you bringing that to my attention. Overton: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Overton. Overton: I will go second here. You know, I can't help but be struck by -- if this was the first application in that Ten Mile area we would have been done last week, but the fact is you are like one of the final big pieces coming in and everywhere I have seen development happen it's the guy stuck with the last piece that seems to have to try to make that puzzle piece fit and has to deal with all the issues and all the complaints that have arisen over time, because of everything else. My main concern at the very beginning was traffic. I stress a lot every day over all the traffic on Eagle Road and what we can do try to reduce it and make it better than it is today. The 33 page ACHD report -- I went through that whole thing and I probably spent more time on it than I needed to now that I understand that you are in compliance and agreement with everything listed in that report. That report was very very descriptive on everything that needed to be done to try to alleviate as much traffic. The main reason I like this project as a big puzzle piece fitting into this end has the most to do with the fact that you are going to be able to go in and complete all of the collector street connections both to the west, to the east, Navigator underneath Ten Mile, the ones to Ten Mile and the ones that are going to go north of Franklin Road. If we were in that piecemeal approach that wouldn't be happening. We would be fighting for every piece of that to try to make those connections happen and we have dealt with another application here, I don't know, six months ago had the same issue when we brought a small piece -- they brought them all together and that's the only way that we got those collector roads brought together that gave us that connectivity that gives people different ways to get in and out of a project. It's been mentioned that Highway 16 is going to give relief. I think we are underestimating the amount of relief Highway 16 is going to give to Ten Mile and the reason why I say that is because we can take other roads and say we are going to -- we are going to put an overpass at Linder, which is an existing road and that's going to get some traffic. But Highway 16 is going to be a brand new, never used before, limited access highway that anybody and everybody that's on the other side of the river would not want to be on Ten Mile with all those traffic signals, they are absolutely going to want to be on a limited access highway that's going to take anybody Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 48 of 56 from Star, Middleton, Emmett everywhere. If you build it they will find the quickest way to get through the valley and that's one of the reasons -- I mean it was almost 19 years ago when that was first proposed and it has taken this long for us to see the Highway 16 coming to fruition. The Linder overpass will help. I don't think it will be as -- as big of relief as some think it will. I think it will help. I think it will help Ten Mile a little bit. I think it will help Meridian Road a little bit. But I think Highway 16 is going to be the big relief valve that's going to take a lot of pressure off of Ten Mile. You know, we talk about partners all the time that we have as we sit up here on Council and everybody has to understand West Ada is one of our partners. We have done joint meetings with them. We talked to them about how best we come up with solutions for them. We ask them should we stop and the last time I asked that question the answer was no. We will figure it out. So, I have a hard time sometimes when I have people in the community wanting us to stop projects because of the school district when the school district themselves doesn't say that and we communicate directly with them. We get the reports back. They have a special -- they have one person who her whole -- sole job is to look at this and send us these letters and I know she is good, because she used to work for us and she works for them now and that's her job and she specifies what they can do. You know, they don't know exactly what their needs are going to be and neither do we. But we have to base a lot of our decisions on exactly what West Ada tells us and where they see it and they know they have rezoning issues they have to do with their schools. It's unpleasant and nobody likes it, but they realize as they have got schools that are underpopulated they need to do rezoning within their district. We set those partners up so that we can look like we are a team. We sit down with ACHD and we don't sit down with ITD too much. I mean I think that's been the theme of the whole room tonight. But we do with ACHD and I consider them a very good partner when we talk about road projects and how we set up the five year work plan for what's important for Meridian and what's important for everybody else and I have been happy with how I have seen a lot of those projects. You know, we are always fighting for Meridian. That's our job. We want to see those projects happen. Ten Mile got built out all the way. Franklin Road is now built out all the way back into Meridian. There are so many projects underway. Eagle Road is getting built between Lake Hazel and Amity right now. There are so many projects going on in the city that are all going to help alleviate some of our traffic concerns right now. I think with the amount of connectivity that you have promised in this project to help alleviate traffic through this, I think we are going to see a viable project at Ten Mile, remembering that a lot of people that may be coming to this as a destination I think are coming straight off the Interstate and we may be having people coming from places that aren't here in Meridian coming here, just like they do to The Village that are going to come off the interstate, they are going to enjoy the amenities and the stores and the retail and they are going to get back on that interstate and they are not to be jamming up Ten Mile to the north. That's my thoughts. I started looking at this I was not that favorable, but as more and more I'm digesting everything that's happening and the way that this project looks to be going, the way that you are taking the whole project and breaking it up into its major parts and components, I truly believe that's the smartest way to build this. I think it's probably the best way to have all the pieces fit where they are instead of being a complete area of mixed uses throughout that 200 acres. We get tired sometimes. I will be the first to admit when I see a lot of Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 49 of 56 medium density and -- and mixed-use I -- I live for the days that I can see low density again. But there was never a point in time that this area of Meridian was meant to be built for low density. That was not ever a topic. If we don't do a project like this today I think we are all going to be back here with a project that we like even less in the future and that's what worries me about a lot of projects is the idea is we don't accept it, we don't accept it, well, wait until you see what comes next. So, with that I'm at a point now that I'm in favor of this project moving forward. Cavener: Thank you, Council Member Overton. Little Roberts: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Little Roberts. Little Roberts: Mr. President. Wow, this one's got a lot of moving parts. I think for me it's made it maybe a little harder to wrap my head around with starting out with so many and, then, trying, but I -- I think as we go through last week and this week that I think Councilman Taylor had a great word with holistic and I think that being able to look at it in a complete 200 acres, instead of piecemealing it -- the more that we talk about it the more that I am liking that we have got that impact and -- and I think that 16 is going to take significant pressure off of Ten Mile. We have -- we have counted on that all along. So, I think that it's going to come to fruition. One of the things that I'm kind of really focused on, because we started really working on Ten Mile when I was running the Chamber is the business aspect that this is going to bring to that area. That is one thing economically we have counted on it raised our -- I was kind of trying to run some numbers here. It -- having the Ten Mile area from what -- the numbers that I have had, I mean it has raised our median income over the years, the businesses that have been, you know, selected that area. Good heavens, we got Paylocity that moved to Boise, then, moved to Ten Mile. You know, with a significant increase for our -- our millennials that we were looking at being able to keep. So, I'm in support of this project. I think it will be -- it's going to take time. We are going to get to watch it evolve as it comes to fruition. It's not going to be built in a day and so I think that it's going to fit in as it is completed over the years. But I think that it's a good project for that area. Cavener: Thank you, Council Member Little Roberts. Whitlock: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: Council President and Members of the Council, I -- I live this every day. I think virtually everybody that's testified -- if I think on their addresses that they stated, they are within a stone's throw of where I live. So, this is my neighborhood, this is my life, this is what I live every day. So, I share some of the concerns that have been expressed. I think the applicant has done a good job tonight addressing some of those concerns that I had. I think last week we talked about concerns over phasing on this Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 50 of 56 and not offering up how this would be phased, but I think Mr. Wardle has addressed some of that and given us the opportunity to -- to contemplate that -- as Council Woman Little Roberts said, this -- this doesn't happen overnight. This is a phased approach. But I think staff probably asked the 64,000 dollar question right off the bat here and, Bill, you asked does this all work and that's the question that I had when I first read the application. It was the question I had as I read the public comment, was the question I had as you presented your materials tonight and as the applicant and -- and those who came to testify shared their thoughts and feelings with us tonight. Does this all work? And, candidly, as somebody who lives in this area and will have to live with whatever happens there, I'm -- I'm coming down on the side of I believe that this can work. I think that the work so far to build the connector and -- and provide some of that critical infrastructure will help alleviate some of the concerns that I had as I listen to what's planned and light industrial and flex and warehouse and even a daycare, a hotel, recreation user I'm -- I'm thinking more and more that this could be a place that does work. This could be a part of our community that -- that we can be proud of if it's done right and we will have more bites at the apple, we will have opportunities to review those applications as they come to us, but I do like the idea of combining those five development agreements into a single one. I -- I like the idea of a larger view and a bigger approach to something that really can be a -- a center point for our community moving forward. So, again, I appreciate the concerns that have been shared by all who have testified. I appreciate that the applicant has worked hard to address the questions that we had and also the concerns that have been raised and, Bill, thank you for putting a finer point on all of this of does this all work and I think at the end of the day I think we -- we probably have an application that can work and something that we ultimately can be proud of. Cavener: Thank you, Council Member Whitlock. Strader: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Strader. Strader: I have been kind of quiet and part of the reason is I have been trying to decide how -- how to sort of handle something, because I think we did ourselves a disservice by not updating the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan and maybe taking an opportunity to -- to refresh that, so I'm -- I'm kind of trying -- what I have been wrestling with is do I -- do I sort of oppose this on principle, because I believe that is the decision we should have made or do I kind of just acknowledge where we are today, which is I think where I'm going to go. The Council has already I think set the precedent of -- I -- I will say a more lenient interpretation of the Ten Mile Specific Area Plan. So, that's something that I'm kind of struggling with. I think it would have been better to continue to update that plan, but I -- I will kind of put that concern aside. Some of the things that have been a concern for me -- traffic has been a concern. I do agree that the Linder Road overpass and Highway 16 will help significantly with some of those concerns. On the school's front, you know, I -- I share a lot of Councilman Overton's comments. At one point we paused -- not formally, but paused many of our residential developments for over six Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 51 of 56 months to work with the West Ada School District to — to help receive updated projections from them and to understand and I was one of the people that did a deep dive on their projection model and trying to understand the methodology that -- that went into that and one thing that was clear from that exercise was that in the big picture, in the very long term, they did not expect enrollment to exceed their ability to serve the students. Certainly at times we have very acute situations throughout the city, but they have continuously told us over and over that -- that they are prepared to address those challenges through changes in boundaries, through portables and people don't love those approaches, but, again, it's like another agency is providing us with that feedback and I had asked them the question directly should we hold off, should we do a moratorium on residential development, so that you can get your arms around this and the answer that's come back very clearly is, no, we don't want you to do that. That they -- that they have got that. So, I share that concern, but at the same time I have an agency that -- that's providing that feedback. The -- the design standards, again, I think if we were sticking closer to our Ten Mile specific plan that would make more sense, but in light of the fact that we have provided exceptions to that, I -- I think an exception here would make sense and the design standards that they are following are very similar to the development across the street. So, I don't have as many concerns there. It -- it's -- for me it's just -- what it comes down to I think is that -- I believe that the -- that the commercial and employment generation coming from this project and the benefits of that far outweigh the risks that come from traffic. I think that this is going to be a driver of economic opportunity for the city in a very significant way and I think that that is the most important aspect. When it comes to multi-family development and, you know, the -- the question of overbuilding versus underbuilding, I think the market is going to resolve that question. If I was a multi-family developer in this interest rate environment coming into this situation I think I would have to take a hard look at all of the multi-family developments that have been approved and really consider that strongly whether it makes sense to develop this or not. But, again, that's not the City Council's role to determine that. That's really a, you know, change in the market and -- and for that developer that ends up bringing that forward. I also think we will get a bite at the apple on the multi-family piece and that for me is kind of what I'm hanging my hat on. So, ultimately, I am in support tonight, but with the reservations that I articulated. Cavener: Thank you, Council Member Strader. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member. Taylor: Thanks to Bill pointing it out, I -- I have answered my own question on the schools, but I think it's worth noting on the records and some data points, specifically with the schools being impacted here Chaparral and a few years ago was at 557, last year 546 -- or, actually, the year before. So, 557, 546, 534. The architectural capacity of 700 and, then, when I went to the schools just to look at the enrollment by grade district wide, first grade enrollment is down by almost 500 students from 5th grade. So, the trend isn't larger class sizes in first grade and -- and I don't mean to be disrespectful Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 52 of 56 to any of the concerns raised tonight, I'm just citing the data from West Ada. And, then, when you look at overall school district enrollment, the trend is down by about 700 students overall in the last few years. So, again, I think just kind of reiterating to me -- even considering all the -- the conditional use permits that have been permitted here, I have a pretty high level of confidence that it's -- we are going to accommodate. Now, the question of educational holistically and overall it's another bigger debate and question that we can have, but I think in terms of -- I just thought it was important to quote those -- those data points as we are thinking through that, because that's a question that I raised, so -- and I actually really really agree with Council Member Strader's opinion on the Ten Mile plan. If -- probably could have -- would have been a worthwhile exercise to have gone through, but we are where we are and I think the point was if we denied this application we probably really ought to take a hard look at that, but I don't think that that's where we are. Cavener: Thank you. Council, I have been very uncharacteristically quiet tonight. That's probably why we are further ahead of schedule than typically. And trying to keep the meeting moving I have kind of kept my comments to myself. A couple things I think just a point of clarification I think is really really important with West Ada that we are learning, particularly in our elementaries. There is architectural capacity and program capacity. Architecture is how many students that building can hold versus how many they can accurately teach and I think that shift in those letters being able to see that helps me understand things a lot, because they aren't always the same. A couple comments and, then, maybe some -- just some ideas to throw out there. One of the hardest parts I think about our job is relying on other agencies to help us make a decision; right? We never get people who come here and complain about Fire response times. We don't get people who come here and complain about Police response times. I don't think we have ever had somebody come here and say, man, we don't like your parks; right? People know when they flush the toilet the water they knows it goes away. When they turn on the sink the water they want is there. The infrastructure that we are in charge of we do really really well. But there is other infrastructure that as a result of decisions we make and people wanting to come here. Again, we looked at the citizen survey tonight. Number one thing that our citizens are concerned about is traffic. Something that we don't have a lot of control over. And it gets exacerbated when an applicant gets a letter 24 hours to say you have got to do blank, something they should have done 16 years — or 16 months ago. It's also equally frustrating when we go through an exercise of ranking our priority projects, only to see the highway district change our priorities and what is and isn't in the integrated five year work plan. That's frustrating, because we make decisions with consistency and, then, suddenly when we get the answers they go and change the questions, which is why I have pause about this. You look at Eagle Landing. Eagle Landing works. The Village works. For years Eagle Road and Fairview, busiest intersection of the state. It's not that way anymore; right? In part because of the STARS agreement we have expanded the roadway there. Traffic has moved to other places. So, I don't have a lot of concern about the applicant's ability to try and mitigate what they can. The conversation about design standards for me is the least of -- I think of my concerns about this project and I -- I went back to -- for a very brief moment in my life I was a newspaper reporter and we Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 53 of 56 add this phrase in our office that says if your mother tells you she loves check your sources. And what that means is there is -- I -- I believe that Highway 16 is going to reduce traffic on Ten Mile. I believe that. I actually think the Linder Road overpass will do that as well, but I can't say how much and I can't say if it's enough to move it away from F and I don't think that if this was an annexation project and Ten Mile was listed at that that I would support it. I don't know if I could support it at D. So, that's hard for me to say, yeah, I'm going to be okay with this when -- when -- when I -- what I believe to be true I need some proof on that. I love that the school district has started to update some of their numbers. I would like to see a trend analysis report that Heather had a chance to provide for us, so that we can look to our constituents and say we made this decision, because we -- we have seen data from the district that enrollment is down. Enrollment is down not just in this school or that school, but across the board and, then, something that we haven't talked about that I -- I do think is -- is important. We started talking about the Ten Mile project, particularly with the URD side, there was a lot of conversation about how this part of Meridian is special and I really believe that it is. It's a part of the area where I -- I grew up as a -- as a kid and I think that if a project of this magnitude is going to go in we need to be able to demonstrate some public amenity that is meaningful that our citizens can rally behind. It's not just the shopping and the great restaurants and the pathway and the walkability. I think it is a greater emphasis not on the amount of open space, but how that space is to be used and so something else -- I guess I would encourage is that maybe we don't make a decision on this tonight, but I support the body. But to give the applicant an opportunity to look at a regional traffic plan on how this project impacts not just their surrounding roads, but the region. An enrollment report from West Ada. And a -- and a recreation plan that we can memorialize within a DA. Those are things that I would want to see to be able to feel confident and that supporting this project is a win for our community and is not going to exacerbate what I believe is accurate is a -- is a really really challenging problem right now. Taylor: Mr. President, could you just restate those times again? Cavener: Council Member Taylor, happy to. Give me a chance to take a breath. The three things that I would -- I would like to see is -- is a -- is a regional TIS and I -- I think this is important. I wish this would have happened 16 months ago. If I would have known -- if I would have been asked if you needed a budget amendment, man, we would have found the money on this. This is something that I think that -- it's not just up to the applicant, the last one in, to cover the cost, this could be a combination I would hope between state, the highway district, the city and the applicant, a collaboration. would support that. So, that's one of regional TIS. Second, a -- a holistic -- to use that term again -- enrollment report for West Ada, talking about what trends are in the classroom size and student enrollment and -- and I would like that ideally to come -- I know our Mayor's not here, but that's something that I would like to maybe be produced in conjunction with West Ada and our staff. I think there is some good partnership there. Then the third is a -- a proposed recreation plan of how recreation or outdoor space would be used if this project were to come online. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 54 of 56 Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Curious what the applicant's response to those -- those three requests would be for, you know, the traffic impact study to be done still, a report, and kind of a plan. Do you have any comments about -- Cavener: So, Mr. Taylor, we can absolutely do that. I just would need a motion to reopen the public hearing. Taylor: I'm not sure I'm there yet. Cavener: Okay. Whitlock: Council President? Cavener: Council Member Whitlock. Whitlock: Thank you for your -- putting your thoughts into that and -- and some options to consider. 1, too, read the 30 pages from ACHD and I -- I do think it answered a lot of the questions. So, I'm -- I'm in agreement with Councilman Overton that we can spend some time and some money and probably come up with some additional ideas, but I think the -- the base and the foundation for how to move forward on traffic is in those 30 plus pages from ACHD is -- is my take on that. I appreciate Bill finding that memo. I had missed that. But I think that does start to show us some of the trends or at least what we are seeing in terms of enrollment in this area and -- and the applicant in their testimony talked about what this -- what this development would be and I was the one that raised the question about open space and recreation last week and asked them to address it and I -- I think with the number of housing units that are there, I think with the walking paths and -- and other things that are incorporated into this, that they have addressed at least my concern that there won't be a push from this particular development into our parks to the north, particularly Fuller Park. I would like to see a greater emphasis on open space and opportunities. I think that's -- I mean we ask for amenities on -- on lots of our developments. So, hopefully, when we get that bite of the apple in the residential piece of this that there will be adequate space for those residents. But as far as a recreational plan for the commercial uses and the warehouses and -- and other elements that are part of this, I -- I don't know that I'm willing to put this on hold to develop a recreation plan for something that probably isn't conducive to what I envision as part of a recreation plan. Then the last comment I would just make is I -- you know, as I drive by this and as I think about Umbria coming out at Franklin -- just to the west of that you already have multi-family units -- apartments that are there and to the west of those apartments you have single family units there and so there is a bit of a transition that's already in place in the north central part of this square mile and so I -- as I'm sitting here thinking I don't know that the 400 units that ultimately would be proposed it would be out of character with what's already Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 55 of 56 there in that particular section of -- of the Ten Mile area. So, just some additional thoughts. I'm -- I'm -- I'm hesitant to put this on hold and -- and wait another six months or however long it takes to do the studies. I think we have what we need to go ahead and make a decision and we -- we have what we have in front of us. Thank you, Mr. President. Cavener: Thank you. Taylor: Mr. President? Cavener: Council Member Taylor. Taylor: Unless any of my colleagues would like to make any other further comments, would be prepared to offer a motion at this point. I do want to make sure I get this right, Bill, and make sure I'm understanding of noting in this dialogue here that if we are to move ahead approving this proposed development plan we would want to change the future land use map to include what's here, the medium high density residential and R- 15 zoning in property area one and commercial and C-G -- C-G zoning in areas two and three. Is that the only changes that we would need to kind of accommodate your concerns and that the -- I think -- as I understood from the testimony the applicant was acceptable to those. Parsons: Mr. President, Members of the Council, that is -- that is correct. Taylor: Okay. Parsons: And, then, also Sonya sent out a revised staff report with some changes. Those have already been included and updated on the website. So, there is no additional modifications that you need to add to the staff report and they have already been added. Should be ready to go. Taylor: Mr. President, I move that we -- after considering all staff, applicant and public testimony that we approve File No. H-2023-0071 with the modification that we make reference to the future land use map designation to include the following: High density residential and R-15 zoning for the property in area one and commercial and C-G zoning in areas two and three. Overton: Second. Cavener: It's been moved and seconded. Any discussion? Seeing none, Mr. Johnson, please call roll. Roll Call: Cavener, nay; Strader, yea; Overton, yea; Little Roberts, yea; Taylor, yea; Whitlock, yea. Cavener: Motion passes. Five in the affirmative. One in opposition. Motion passes. Meridian City Council September 24,2024 Page 56 of 56 MOTION CARRIED: FIVE AYES. ONE NAY. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS Cavener: Next item on the agenda is Future Meeting Topics. Council, any future meeting topics? Seeing none, do I have a motion to adjourn? Little Roberts: Mr. President, I move we adjourn. Cavener: So moved. All in favor say aye. No opposition. We are adjourned. Thank you everyone. MOTION CARRIED: ALLAYES. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:22 P.M. (AUDIO RECORDING ON FILE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS) COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER 10-15-2024 ATTEST: CHRIS JOHNSON - CITY CLERK 10-15-2024 E IDIAN;--- /hl R AGENDA ITEM Public Forum - Future Meeting Topics The Public are invited to sign up in advance of the meeting at www.meridiancity.org/forum to address elected officials regarding topics of general interest or concern of public matters. Comments specific to an active land use/development applications are not permitted during this time. By law, no decisions can be made on topics presented at the Public Forum. However, City Council may request the topic be added to a future meeting agenda for further discussion or action. The Mayor may also direct staff to provide followup assistance regarding the matter. I 1 I I i CITY OF MERIDIAN I CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEET Date: September 24, 2024 3 Please sign in below if you wish to address the Mayor and City Council and provide a brief description of your topic. Please observe the following rules of the Public Forum: • DO NOT: o Discuss active applications or proposals pending before Planning and Zoning or City Council o Complain about city staff, individuals, business or private matters • DO o When it is your turn to speak, state your name and address first o Observe a 3-minute time limit (you may be interrupted if your topic is deemed inappropriate for this forum) Name (please print) Brief Description of Discussion Topic E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Parks & Recreation Department Director's Report on Transfer of Western Ada Recreation District Assets to the City of Meridian Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: ENIDLIAN114-�- Luke railer,Caven ri President Liz Strader,Vice President Brian Whitlock H O Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts September 24, 2024TO: Meridian City Council Mayor Robert E. Simison FROM: Steve Siddoway, Parks and Recreation Department Director Emily Kane, Deputy City Attorney RE: Transfer of WARD Assets to City of Meridian This memorandum is provided to recap the plan to transfer assets held by the Western Ada Recreation District ("WARD") to City ownership. This project has been several years in the making, and one of the final steps will be action by City Council at your September 24, 2024 meeting. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets executed by WARD and the City on April 2, 2024 (Exhibit A), WARD is conveying the following assets to the City: 1. Meridian Community Swimming Pool, located at 213 E. Franklin Road. Under a License and Maintenance Agreement, the City has been operating and maintaining the Pool on WARD's behalf since February 8, 2022. By Quitclaim Deed approved by WARD at its August 28, 2024 meeting (Exhibit B), WARD will convey fee simple ownership of the Pool to the City when the City records the Quitclaim Deed on September 30, 2024. 2. Settlers Village Neighborhood Park, located at 1031 E. Tammy Street. The City has also been maintaining the Park on WARD's behalf pursuant to the February 8, 2022 License and Maintenance Agreement. By another Quitclaim Deed approved by WARD at its August 28, 2024 meeting (Exhibit C), WARD will convey fee simple ownership of the Park to the City when the City records the Quitclaim Deed on September 30, 2024. 3. All Personal Property. Pursuant to an Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property,which will be on City Council's agenda on September 24, WARD will convey to the City all personal property at the Pool, Park, and Lakeview Golf Course (4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian) (Exhibit D). WARD approved this Agreement at its meeting on August 28, 2024. Following approval of the Agreement by City Council and execution by the Mayor, it will be effective as of closing on September 30, 2024. 4. Leasehold at Lakeview Golf Course. The City owns Lakeview Golf Course. On May 17, 2005, the City leased the Golf Course to Lakeview Meridian Investors LLC, and Boise Ranch Golf Course, Inc. On November 6, Meridian Parks & Recreation Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #206 . Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 . Fax 208-489-0482 . www.meridiancity.org 2020, the City assigned the lease to WARD. The City has been operating and maintaining the Golf Course on WARD's behalf,pursuant to a License and Management Agreement, since August 11, 2020. The lease agreement states that the leasehold interest may be extinguished by tendering a quitclaim deed to the City. WARD approved a Quitclaim Deed to this effect at its August 28, 2024 meeting (Exhibit E). The City will record the Quitclaim Deed on September 30, 2024, at which point the leasehold will be extinguished. Pursuant to the April 2, 2024 Memorandum of Agreement, WARD is entitled to consideration for these conveyances of real and personal property in the amount of$1.00. We have received an invoice from WARD for this payment. The agreed-upon closing date is September 30, 2024, and closing will be effectuated when the Clerk's Office staff records the quitclaim deeds and Finance Department staff mails the check. My staff are in the process of obtaining valuations for the properties and taking inventory of the personal property for the purposes of asset management and FY24 closeout. Idaho Code section 67-2323 requires published notice of agreements involving "conveyances or transfers of real or personal property with a value in excess of ten thousand dollars ($10,000)." Pursuant to that provision, notices that City Council proposes to ratify the conveyances from WARD at its September 24, 2024 meeting have been published in the Idaho Press on September 10 and September 17, 2024. (Notices of WARD's August 28, 2024 meeting were also published, on August 15 and 22, 2024.) The action items I will request from City Council at its September 24, 2024 meeting are: 1. Adopt a resolution acknowledging and ratifying the conveyances of the Pool and Park from WARD; 2. Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property; and 3. Adopt a resolution acknowledging WARD's termination of its lease of the Golf Course. Please contact me if you have any questions about the history of this project, or the remaining steps. You can reach me at ssiddowaykmeridiancity.org or 208-489-0556. I look forward to continuing WARD's long-standing legacy of stewardship and service to the Meridian community as the City accepts these generous gifts from WARD. Meridian Parks & Recreation Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #206 . Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 . Fax 208-489-0482 . www.meridiancity.org E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Resolution 24-2474: Ratifying the Conveyance of Real and Personal Property from the Western Ada Recreation District; Accepting the Termination of the Western Ada Recreation District's Lease of Lakeview Golf Course; and Providing an Effective Date CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 24- BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE CONVEYANCE OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY FROM THE WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT; ACCEPTING THE TERMINATION OF THE WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT'S LEASE OF LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Western Ada Recreation District ("WARD") is the owner and steward of these recreational facilities and related holdings (collectively, "Assets"): 1) Real property located at 213 E. Franklin Road, in Meridian, currently developed as a swimming pool ("Pool"), 2) Real property located at 1031 E. Tammy Street, in Meridian, currently developed as a neighborhood park ("Park"), and 3) Personal property owned by WARD for the operation and maintenance of the Pool, the Park, and Lakeview Golf Course (located at 4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian, currently owned by City and developed as an 18-hole public golf course, driving range, pro shop, restaurant and related facilities ("Golf Course")) ("Personal Property"); WHEREAS,pursuant to an agreement entitled Assignment of Lease and Leasehold Improvements executed on November 6, 2020, WARD holds a leasehold interest in the Golf Course ("Lease"), which interest may be extinguished by quitclaim deed, pursuant to provision 9.I of the May 17, 2005 Assignment of Lease and Amended Lease Agreement for the Provision of Golf Course Operations at City of Meridian's Municipal Golf Course; WHEREAS,pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2322 and the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets executed by WARD and the City on April 2, 2024, in exchange for consideration in the amount of one dollar($1.00), WARD seeks to convey the Assets to City and to terminate its Lease of the Golf Course; WHEREAS,by this resolution, the City Council of the City of Meridian seeks to ratify the conveyance of the Assets to City and accept the instrument terminating WARD's lease of the Golf Course; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City of Meridian gratefully accepts the Assets conveyed by WARD and intends to use them for the benefit of the Meridian community, and therefore ratifies the instruments conveying the Pool and Park, attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively, directs the City Clerk to record such instruments on September 30, 2024, and directs the Finance Department to mail consideration in the amount of one dollar($1.00) to WARD on September 30, 2024. RESOLUTION RATIFYING WARD'S PROPERTY CONVEYANCE AND ACCEPTING WARD'S TERMINATION OF GOLF COURSE LEASE PAGE 1 Section 2. That, as of September 30, 2024, the City of Meridian accepts WARD's conveyance of the Personal Property; to that end, will enter into the Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit C; and directs the Mayor to execute such Agreement on behalf of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That, as of September 30, 2024, the City of Meridian accepts WARD's tender of the quitclaim deed terminating WARD's lease of the Golf Course, attached hereto as Exhibit D; directs the City Clerk to record such instruments on September 30, 2024; and upon recording of the quitclaim deed, such lease shall be extinguished. Section 4. That, following Closing, as described in the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets executed by WARD and the City on April 2, 2024, the Director of the Meridian Parks and Recreation District is directed to exercise general administration and maintenance of the Pool, Park, Golf Course, and all real and personal property associated therewith, for the benefit of the Meridian community. Section 5. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of September, 2024. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of September, APPROVED: Robert E. Simison, Mayor ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION RATIFYING WARD'S PROPERTY CONVEYANCE AND ACCEPTING WARD'S TERMINATION OF GOLF COURSE LEASE PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Grantor"),does hereby grant,bargain, sell, and convey unto the City of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose current address is 33 E.Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho("Grantee"), and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises,in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: See attached Exhibit 1. To have and to hold the said premises,together with all buildings, structures, improvements,fixtures, and appurtenances thereto, and any and all estate,right,title,interest, appurtenances,tenements,hereditaments,reversions,remainders, easements,rents,issues,profits, rights-of-way and water rights in anywise appertaining to the real property herein described,unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thiA of 2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION n � . ) ss: DISTRICT County of� ) Thtrecoras d w acknowledged before me on the�'ddaay ,2024,by Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the a ecreatio istrict,in his capacity as Board Shari Wardle, Board President r Notary Public f r Residing at ,Idaho ••. cam, F REF ,, My Commission Expires: Z L �d ��•' pTARy .ter • C� • C) ••. F Of .• QUITCLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PAGE 1 EXHIBIT 1 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, and is described as follows: A parcel of land, as shown on the Record of Survey No. 8737, on file under Instrument No.110021878 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho, lying in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 18, T.3N., R.lE., B.M.,Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the North 1/4 corner of said Section 18, marked by a brass cap; thence along the North line of said Section 18 South 89°20'05"West 1309.06 feet to the Northeast comer of Government Lot 1 of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 18 as shown on Record of Survey No. 2017 on file under Instrument No. 9168335 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho; thence along the East line of said Government Lot 1 South 00°40'03"West 414.24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, marked by an iron pin; thence continuing South 00"40'03"West 247.34 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 52°1T11" West 450.67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 00°40'03" East 11.43 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 87°14'16" East 173.69 feet to a point of curve, marked by an iron pin; thence along the arc of a curve to the left 55.71 feet, said curve having a radius of 66.00 feet, a central angle of 48°21'47", and a long chord bearing North 63°03'22"East 54.07 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 38°52'29" East 44.52 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 51°07'31" East 19.67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 38°52'29" West 16.49 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 51°52'37" East 133.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN: S 1118223084 QurrcLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PAGE 2 EXHIBIT B RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho("Grantor"),does hereby grant,bargain, sell, and convey to the City of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho("Grantee"),and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises,in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: Lot 14 in Block 2 of SETTLERS VILLAGE,a re-plat of the original Settlers Plat as vacated by the City of Meridian in April, 1981,according to the plat thereof,filed in Book 51 of Plats at Pages 4206 through 4209;and Amended by an Affidavit recorded August 3, 1984 as Instrument No. 8438997 and Affidavit recorded December 18,2007 as Instrument No. 107166403,Records of Ada County,Idaho. To have and to hold the said premises,together with all buildings, structures,improvements, fixtures,and appurtenances thereto,and any and all estate,right,title,interest,appurtenances,tenements, hereditaments,reversions,remainders,easements,rents,issues,profits,rights-of-way and water rights in anywise appertaining to the real property herein described,unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thisJday of 2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT ) ss: County of ) Thi record was acknowledged before me on the da of 2024,by Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the Shaun Wardle,Board President tA istrict,in his capacity as Board Presiden7 . """"�•.,, Notary Public r I o REE, , Residing at ,Idaho ;• :o. ]0,•:9�, My Commission xpires: 112,11)30 °y 0 N+Y •• C - �'�• Cam• /q Th OF QUITCLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF TAMMy STREET PARK PAGE 1 EXHIBIT C AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY This AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY ("Agreement") is made this_day of , 2024 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City"), and the Western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("WARD") (collectively, "Parties"). WHEREAS,WARD is the owner of personal property ("Personal Property") used for the operation and maintenance of the Community Swimming Pool, located at 213 E. Franklin Road, in Meridian ("Pool"), a neighborhood park located at 1031 E. Tammy Street, in Meridian ("Park"), and Lakeview Golf Course, located at 4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian ("Golf Course"); and, WHEREAS,pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets entered into by the Parties ("MOA"), by this Agreement WARD seeks to convey the Personal Property to City; and WHEREAS,by this Agreement City gratefully accepts the Personal Property and agrees to use the same for the benefit of the Meridian community; NOW, THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: I.WARD's CONVEYANCE. A. Convey Personal Property. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, WARD hereby conveys to City, free of charge, any and all Personal Property used for the operation and maintenance of the Pool, Park, and Golf Course. B. Certifications.WARD hereby certifies that: 1. WARD is not required to obtain the approval or consent of any person, firm, or other entity to permit WARD to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 2. WARD owns and possesses all rights, title, and interest in and to the Personal Property, free and clear of all covenants, conditions, easements, liens, and encumbrances. 3. There is no equitable, legal, or administrative suit, action, arbitration, or other proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting WARD or the Personal Property. H.CITY's ACCEPTANCE. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, City shall accept and own, without payment,WARD's conveyance of the Personal Property,pursuant to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, and shall take ownership and possession of the Personal Property upon Closing. AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD'S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 1 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Notice. All other notices required to be given by either of the Parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, addressed as follows : If to City : If to WARD . City Clerk Shaun Wardle, Board President City of Meridian Western Ada Recreation District 33 E . Broadway Avenue P . O . Box 566 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83680 B . Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon the Effective Date and shall expire upon Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, unless earlier extended or terminated as set forth herein . C. Assignment. Neither party shall assign or sublet all or any portion of its respective interest in this Agreement or any privilege or right hereunder, either voluntarily or involuntarily, without the prior written consent of the other party. This Agreement and each and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations , legal representative, successors , and assigns of the Parties . D. No agency. For purposes of or in furtherance of this Agreement, neither party nor its respective employees , agents , contractors, officials , officers , servants , guests , and/or invitees shall be considered agents of the other in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever. E. Liability. Each party shall be solely liable for the actions and/or inactions , including errors , omissions, and/or negligence of its own employees . Neither party shall bear any responsibility or liability for the errors , omissions , and/or negligence of the other. F. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, City and WARD shall comply with all applicable laws , ordinances , and codes of Federal, State, and local governments . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3 , of the Idaho Constitution . G. Termination. 1 . Grounds. Grounds for termination of this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to : non-appropriation of funds necessary to meet either party' s obligations under this Agreement ; an act or omission by either party which materially breaches any term of this Agreement; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance of the terms of this Agreement by either party ; or a change in or occurrence of circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 2 2 . Process. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) days ' notice of intention to terminate. Such notice shall include a description of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination . A fourteen ( 14) day cure period shall commence upon provision of the notice of intention to terminate . If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this Agreement may be terminated upon mailing of notice of termination . H. Construction and severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. I. Time of the essence. The Parties acknowledge obligations under this Agreement shall be fulfilled in a timely manner. The Parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. J. Third-party beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it in any way be interpreted or construed to create, any third-party beneficiary rights in any person or entity not a party hereto . K. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts , each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. L. No limitation. Nothing in this Agreement or any other agreement shall prevent or limit City, when City owns the Personal Property, from alienating or making any improvements or changes to the Personal Property or any component thereof, whether temporarily or permanently, as may be deemed by City to further the public interest, health, safety, and/or welfare. M. Authority. The Parties certify that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement has been duly approved in accordance with applicable laws and any documents or instruments governing the respective Parties , and that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement will not, with the passage of time, the giving of notice, or otherwise, cause either Party to be in violation or breach of any law, regulation, contract, agreement, or other restriction to or by which the Party or the personal property conveyed by this Agreement are subject or bound . N. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and WARD . The Parties signatory hereto represent and warrant that each is duly authorized to bind, respectively, City and WARD to this Agreement in all respects . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT: ShauffWardle, Board President CITY OF MERIDIAN: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest: Chris Johnson, City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD'S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 4 EXHIBIT D RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO. MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Grantor"), does hereby convey,release,remise and forever quitclaim unto the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose current address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho ("Grantee"), and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises, in Ada County, Idaho, to wit: See attached Exhibit 1: Lakeview Golf Course And including,but not limited to, Grantor's leasehold interest in said premises, if any (collectively, "Property"). To have and to hold the said Property, unto the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns,forever. IN WITNE S WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on this jg4ay of k ,2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss: DISTRICT County of ��± '� Thi record was acknowledged before me on the G-day ,2024 b Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the V�este a Recreation D' ct,in his capacity as Board Shan Wardle, Board President President. Notary Public for Nato Residing at Idaho Co F REtz4f , My Commission Expires: lgjgy�, i • ARY iT TE•OF`'�, I still" QUITCLAIM DEED—LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST iN LAKEvIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 1 EXIIIIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY Parcel I A parcel of land being a portion of the West half Section 3,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 3 North,Range I West,Boise Meridian,Meridian,Ada County Idaho; thence along the Southerly boundary of said Northeast Quarter of Section 3 North 88155'29"West 2643.29 feet to a brass cap marking the Southwest comer of the Northeast Quarter; thence leaving said Southerly boundary North 75°30'00" West 190.00 feet to a 2" iron pipe; thence North 400001001,West 40.06 feet to an iron pin;thence South 75°59'31" West 70.00 feet to an iron pin; thence South 25000'00" West 64.19 feet to an iron pin;thence North 89025'06" West 254.51 feet to a point, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;thence continuing North 89°25'06" West 100.01 feet to a point; thence South 00'30'11"West 407.92 feet to a point; thence South 68054'11" East 276.46 feet to a point marking a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right 59.46 feet, said curve having a central angle of 34°04'10", a radius of 100.00 feet, tangents of 30.64 feet and a long chord of 58.59 feet bearing South 51052'06"East to a point marking a point of tangents;thence South 34050'01"East 292.99 feet to a point;thence South 89°48'41" East 147.34 feet to a point; thence North 35°00'00" West 109.03 feet to a point; thence North 51°45'00"West 580.00 feet to a point;thence North 00°29'44"East 335.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel II A parcel of land lying in portions of the South half of the North half and the North half of the South half of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County,Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point marking the Northwest comer of the said North half of the South half of Section 3;thence South 89°25'06" East 2,077.73 feet along the Northerly boundary of the said North half of the South half of Section 3 to a point also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 0°29'44" West 335.18 feet to a point;thence South 51°45'00" East 580.00 feet to a point; thence South 35°00'00"East 285.33 feet to a point;thence South 220 15'00" West 60.05 feet to a point;thence QUITCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 2 South 43°58'10" East 238.75 feet to a point; thence South 29100'00"East 110.00 feet to a point;thence North 61°00'00" East 81.19 feet to a point of curve;thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 147.14 feet, said curve having a central angle of 48°10'28", a radius of 175.00 feet, tangents of 78.23 feet and a long chord of 142.84 feet bearing North 36°54'46" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 56°30'00" West 151.38 feet to a point; thence North 41°30'00" West 203.92 feet to a point; thence North 17*15'00" West 94.14 feet to a point;thence North 22°15'00" East 147.00 feet to a point; thence North 65°50'00" East 45.00 feet to a point; thence South 87120'00" East 78.40 feet to a point; thence South 68°00'00" East 61.48 feet to a point; thence South 71°33'25"East 88.05 feet to a point; thence South 60°00'00" East 108.33 feet to a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the right 139.32 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25*35'19", a radius of 311.95 feet,tangents of 70.84 feet and along chord of 138.16 feet bearing North 56°12'20"East to a point of tangent;thence North 69100'00"East 115.08 feet to a point of curve;thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 125.75 feet, said curve having a central angle of 24°25'22", a radius of 295.00 feet, tangents of 63.84 feet and a long chord of 124.80 feet bearing North 56'47'19" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 44°00'00" West 79.63 feet to a point;thence North 67°45'00" West 160.00 feet to a point; thence South 65°50'00" West 244.67 feet to a point; thence North 50°30'00" West 114.35 feet to a point; thence North 44°00'00" East 90.00 feet to a point; thence North 17°00'00" West 175.00 feet to a point; thence North 12000'00" East 280.00 feet to a point; thence North 77°30'00"West 170.00 feet to a point;thence South 68000'00" West 265.00 feet to a point marking the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of the said Section 3;thence North 75030'00" West 190.00 feet to a point; thence North 40100'00" West 40.00 feet to a point; thence South 75*59'31"West 70.00 feet to a point;thence South 25°00'00"West 64.19 feet to a point on the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3;thence North 89°25'06" West 254.51 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT that portion lying within the following subdivisions: Cherry Lane Village No. 1 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 and 3538,records of Ada County,Idaho; Cherry Lane Village No. 2 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792,records of Ada County,Idaho; The Lake at Cherry Lane,according to the plat thereof filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570,records of Ada County,Idaho; The Lake at Cherry Lane No.2,according to the plat thereof filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883,records of Ada County,Idaho; QUITCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 3 The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675,records of Ada County,Idaho. Parcel III-A A portion of the West half of Section 3,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9, 10 and the said Section 3;thence North 0°3 8'11"East 2651.19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972(CP&F Instrument No.7852146,records of Ada County,tdaho);from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38'27"East 2697.49 feet;thence North 0°38'27"East 22.64 feet to a 5/8"iron pin;thence South 88°5531" East 379.53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 88°55'31"East 182.65 feet to a point; thence South 8°18'10" East 440.66 feet to a point; thence South 16°18'25" West 218.04 feet to a point; thence North 89°13'51" East 540.22 feet to a point; thence North 71043134" East 442.46 feet to a point; thence North 10°33'50" East 487.84 feet to a point; thence South 88°55'31"East 124.84 feet to a point; thence South 50038'25" East 89.99 feet to a point; thence 165.33 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 250.25 feet, a central angle of 37°51'08", and a long chord bearing South 31°42'52"East 162.34 feet to a point; thence North 89029'44" West 120.24 feet to a point; thence South 4027'17"East 80.30 feet to a point;thence South 0030'16" West 230.52 feet to a point; thence South 10031'20" West 123.51 feet to a point; thence South 301 14'07" West 119.57 feet to a point; thence South 50150'29" West 134.39 feet to a point; thence South 71°2848" West 120.64 feet to a point; thence South 82045'52" West 225.84 feet to a point; thence South 89002'57" West 67.30 feet to a point; thence North 89010'41" West 825.06 feet to a point; thence North 77029'20"West 148.07 feet to a point;thence North 89'10'41"West 160.40 feet to a point lying 65.00 feet East of the West boundary of said Section 3;thence along a line 65.00 feet East of and parallel to the West boundary of said Section 3 North 0*38'11" East 247.64 feet to a point, thence South 89021'49" East 156.03 feet to a point; thence North 45°03'16"East 163.61 feet to a point;thence North 5°39'31" East 502.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. QUITCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 4 Parcel III-B A portion of the West half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0'38 ' 11 " East 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °3827" East 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0138 ' 27" East 22 .64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°56 ' 31 " East 1977 . 72 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence South 0°30 ' 15 " West 413 . 59 feet to a point; thence North 68 *54 ' 11 " West 26. 71 feet to a point; thence North 0*30 ' l 5 " East 217 . 93 feet to a point , thence 211 . 88 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 249 .75 feet, a central angle of 48°3625 " and a long chord bearing North 23 °47 ' 57" West 205 . 58 feet to a point ; thence South 88 °5531 " East 109.62 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel IV-A A portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West ; Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °3827" East 22.64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 379 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 5 °3931 " East, 290 , 28 feet to a point; thence 46. 45 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 250 .00 feet, a central angle of 10*38 ' 46" , and a long chord bearing South 49122 ' 43 " East, 46.39 feet to a point; thence South 44°03 ' 20" East, 136 . 41 feet to a point; thence South 8 * 18 ' 10" East, 165 . 80 feet to a point ; thence North 8805531 " West, 182 . 65 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel IV-B A portion of Government Lot 4 and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows : QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 5 Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 91 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet ; thence North 0°38 '27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 834. 71 feet to a point ; thence North 1104 '29" East, 77.45 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence 199 .31 feet along the are of curve to the right having a radius of 270.00 feet , a central angle of 42117 '41 and a long chord bearing North 65112 ' 11 " West, 194. 81 feet to a point; thence North 44°03 '20" West, 198 .06 feet to a point; thence North 37°38 ' 05 " East, 125 . 90 feet to a point; thence North 4 °26' 20" West, 178 .94 feet to a point; thence North 49° 13 '43 " West, 619. 18 feet to a point; thence North 89°21 ' 33 " West, 39 .72 feet to a point; thence North 013827" East, 178 ,61 feet to a point; thence South 89°21 ' 33 " East, 104 .94 feet to a point; thence North 26°46 ' 55" East, 463 . 73 feet to a point; thence North 13 °05 ' 08 " East, 186. 18 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 221 . 37 feet to a point; thence South 0 °3656" West, 30.00 feet to a point; thence North 89°23 ' 04" West, 114.43 feet to a point; thence South 10*38 ' 11 " West, 162 .48 feet to a point; thence South 5136 ' 09" East, 160.95 feet to a point; thence South 48°58 ' 55 " West, 66.41 feet to a point; thence South 10°49 ' 04" West, 123 .62 feet to a point; thence South 12°00 ' 00" East, 85.00 feet to a point; thence South 53 °26 '21 " East, 142 .60 feet to a point; thence South 6°51 ' 51 " West , 151 .05 feet to a point; thence South 41 ° 14 ' 14" East, 171 . 06 feet to a point; thence South 89° 12 '26" East, 122 .33 feet to a point ; thence South 43°03 ' 05 " East, 60. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 0°36 ' 15" West, 671 . 50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Parcel IV -C A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 , 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 ( CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8 ' iron pin; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1784 . 61 feet to a point; thence North 1 °04 ' 29" East, 303 . 15 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 66128 '40" West, 157 . 70 feet to a point ; thence QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 6 North 56056 ' 39" West, 717.37 feet to a point ; thence North 89023 ' 44" West, 36. 12 feet to a point ; thence North 0°36 '28 " East, 5 . 00 feet to a point; thence 154. 59 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 225 .00 feet, a central angle of 39°22 ' 00", and a long chord bearing North 19 °04 ' 45 " West, 151 . 57 feet to a point; thence North 38°45 ' 45 " West, 39 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 51 ° 14 ' 15 " East, 110 . 00 feet to a point; thence North 26° 11 ' 31 " West, 134. 78 feet to a point ; thence North 4004120" West, 277 .45 feet to a point; thence North 31 °46 ' 35 " West, 241 .56 feet to a point; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 132.59 feet to a point; thence North 89123 '04" West, 110 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 30. 00 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 175 .94 feet to a point; thence South 78005 '29" East, 71 . 13 feet to a point; thence South 63013 ' 16 " East, 65 . 34 feet to a point; thence South 56°28 ' 32" East, 79 . 07 feet to a point ; thence South 53015 ' 09 " East, 86 . 07 feet to a point, thence South 42 *31 ' 18" East, 70.53 feet to a point; thence South 35 °28 ' 22" East, 7T08 feet to a point ; thence South 5049 ' 06" East, 249 . 89 feet to a point; thence South 8 ° 16 '07" East, 125 .42 feet to a point; thence South 13 °56 ' 20" East, 266.06 feet to a point; thence South 42143 ' 29" East, 283 .07 feet to a point; thence North 61 °49 ' 13" East, 165 .37 feet to a point; thence North 11100 ' 42" West, 399. 24 feet to a point ; thence South 89018 ' 49" East, 398 .40 feet to a point; thence South 79°02 ' 15 " East, 61 . 16 feet to a point ; thence South 60*40 ' 15 " East, 164.39 feet to a point; thence South 85° 10 ' 18 " East, 136.30 feet to a point; thence South 0'30 ' 15 " West, 235 .93 feet to a point; thence North 89129 '45 " West, 80. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 78033 '49" West, 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence South 11 °45 ' 15 " West, 185 . 77 feet to a point ; thence South 0°30 ' 15" West, 154. 10 feet to a point, thence 288 . 86 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 38 °56 ' 31 and a long chord bearing South 63004 ' 11 " West, 283 .33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , EXCEPTING THEREFROM ; A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast comer of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3 , South 00°27 ' 29" West 1 , 365 .57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast comer of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEwGOLF COURSE PAGE 7 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, North 89° 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest comer of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision; thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486 . 13 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence continuing along said Westerly boundary, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 19. 38 feet to a point; thence leaving said Northwesterly boundary, North 89°29 '45 " West 79.95 feet to a point; thence South 78 °33 ' 49 ' West 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence North 11 °45 '06 " East 20. 62 feet to a point; thence North 78 °53 ' 05" East 183 .47 feet to a point; thence South 89°29 ' 54" East 74. 99 feet to the Point of Beginning. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM . A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho and more particularly described as follows ; Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West , Boise Meridian, Meridian Ada County , Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3, South 00°27 '2 . 9" West 1 ,365. 57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, North 89* 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest corner of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision, thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486. 13 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving said Westerly boundary North 89°29 ' 54" West 74 . 97 feet to an iron pin; thence South 78 °53 ' 05 " West 183 .47 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence South 11 °45 ' 06" West 206. 39 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 00°30 ' 06" West 154. 08 feet to an iron pin, thence Southwesterly 24. 54 feet along the arc of a curve to the left said curve having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 03118 '29", and a long chord bearing South 80°53 '03 " West 24. 54 feet, to a point on the Easterly right of way of the Eight Mile Lateral ; thence along said Easterly right of way North 00°42 ' 19" East 347 .61 feet to a point ; thence leaving said Easterly said right of way North 78153 ' 05" East 64.54 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER,INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 8 Parcel IV -D A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 098 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0138 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet; thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1614 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 10'33 '50" East, 72 . 37 feet to a point; thence 129 . 52 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 600. 00 feet, a central angle of 12 °22 '07", and a long chord bearing South 56°49 ' 29" East, 129.27 feet to a point; thence South 50°3825" East, 4 . 33 feet to a point; thence North 88 °5531 " West, 124 . 84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 9 Parcel IV -E A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows. Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4 , 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 *38 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet, thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88 °55 '31 " East, 1977.72 feet to a 5/8" iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 88 °55 ' 31 " West 109. 62 feet to a point; thence 11 . 06 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 249. 75 feet, a central angle of 2132 ' 16 ", and a long chord hearing North 49°22 ' 17" West , 11 .06 feet to a point, thence North 50°38 ' 25 " West, 94 .32 feet to a point ; thence 60 .45 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 680. 00 feet, a central angle of 5 °05 '36", and a long chord bearing North 53 ° 11 ' l3 " West, 60.43 feet to a point; thence 30. 13 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a central angle of 86° 18 ' 50", and a long chord bearing North 12°34 ' 36" West, 27 . 36 feet to a point ; thence North 30°34 ' 50" East, 84 . 13 feet to a point; thence 269 . 77 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 375 , 00 feel, a central angle of 41 * 13 ' 04", and a long chord bearing North 51 ° 11 '21 " East , 263 .99 feet to a point; thence South 0 °30 ' 15 " West, 369. 89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , Parcel V Lots I and 52 in Block 5 , and Lot I 1 in Block 9 of Cherry Lane Village No . I Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 through 3538 , records of Ada County, Idaho. Parcel VI Lots 12 and 21 in Block 9 and Lot 4 in Block I I and Lot 53 in Block 5 of Cherry Lane Village No . 2 Subdivision , according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792 , records of Ada County , Idaho. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 10 Parcel VII Lot 83 in Block 5 and Lot 14, in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5473 through 5475 , records of Ada County, Idaho . EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Lot 83 in Block 5 of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision located in the SE '/+ of Section 3 , T. 3N . , R . I W. , B . M . , Ada County , Idaho, and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast comer of said SE %, ; thence North 00' 19 ' 11 " East 451 . 29 feet along the Easterly boundary of said SE '/. and the centerline of Ten Mile Road to a point marking the intersection of the centerline of the proposed Woodmont Drive and said centerline of Ten Mile Road ; thence along the following courses and distances along said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive ; North 89'40 '49" West 136 . 00 feet to a point of curve ; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the right 54 .87 feet, said curve having a central angle of 21 °40 ' 49", a radius of 145 . 00 feet, tangents of 27. 77 feet and a long chord of 54 . 54 feet bearing North 78050 ' 25 " West to a point of tangent; thence North 68 °00 ' 00" West 171 .40 feet to a point of curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the left 78 . 86 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25 °49 ' 14", a radius of 175 . 00 feet, tangents of 40 . 11 feet and a long chord of 78. 20 feet bearing North 80 °54 ' 37" West to a point of ending of curve; thence leaving said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive along a non- tangent line, South 05035 ' 15 " West 25 .40 feet to a point marking the Northwesterly corner of Lot 84, Block 5 of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No . 3 Subdivision, also said point being on the Southwesterly right-of--way line of said proposed Woodmont Drive, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 05 ' 35 ' 15 " West 66 . 64 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Lot 84, Block 5 to a point marking the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 84, Block 5, also said point being on the Southerly boundary of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision; thence North 60°50 '49" West 3 .00 feet along said Southerly boundary of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision to a point ; thence leaving said Southerly boundary , North 05 * 13 ' 51 " West 62 .96 feet to a point on said Southerly right-of--way line of proposed Woodmont Drive, also said point being a point on curve; thence Northeasterly along a non-tangent curve to the right along said Southerly right-of-- way line of proposed Woodmont Drive 15 .01 feet, said curve having a central angle of 05 °44 ' 02", a radius of 150. 00 feet, tangents of 7 . 51 feet and a long chord of 15 . 00 feet bearing North 81 °4336" East to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel VIII Lot 28 in Block I I and Lot 39 in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No . 4 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 63 of Plats at Pages 6376 and 6377, records of Ada County, Idaho, QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE I I Parcel IX Lot 9 in Block l of Record of Survey No. 802 of adjusted lot lines for Lots 8 , 9 and 10, in Block l of The Lake at Cherry Lane, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570, records of Ada County , Idaho. EXCEPT that portion lying within the original Lot 8 . Parcel X Lot 5 in Block 1 and Lot 13 in Block 2, The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 2, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XI Lot 24 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 70 of Plats at Pages 7167 and 7168 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XII Lot 19 in Block 1 and Lot 46 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Page 7674 and 7675 , records of Ada County, Idaho . QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 12 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-054699 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=1 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RE ORDEVGRWLTESTEDBYANI} WHEN RECORDED RET URN T0: PMDLW CITY CLERif 33E.Broadway Avenue Meridian;=ldfaha 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized-under the laws of the State"of Idaho("Grantor"),-"does hereby grant,bargain,sell, and convey to the City of Meridian;a muiucipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue;Meridian;Idaho("Grantee"),and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises;in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: "Lot 14 in Block 2 of SETTLERS VILLAGE, a re-plat of the original Settlers Plat as vacated by the City of Meridian in April, according to the plat thereof,filled in-Book 51 of Plats at Pages 4206 through 4209;and Amended by an Affidavit recorded August"3, 1984 as:Instrument No. 8438997 and Affidavit recorded December 18,2007 as Instrument No. 107166403 -Records of Ada County,-Idaho.-. To have and to:hold the said premises;together with all buildings,structures,improvements, fixtures,and appurtenances thereto,and any and all estate,right,title,interest,appurtenances;tenements, hereditaments,reversions,remainders,easements,rents,issues,profits,rights-of-way acid water,rights-in anywise appertaining to:the reel property herein described,unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever: , WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thi _ ay of 2024. GRA NTOR: :. STATE OF IDAHO � WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT ) ss:- County of ) Th4reco_ rd was acknowledged beftare me on the day of2024,by Shaun Wardle,:on behalf of the----- istrict, his capacity as Board Shaun Wardle,Board President Presiders Notary Public r I llo Residing at Idaho �.�. z - .� My Commission xpires: 7LBee- OmcT.I�ilvi DEED FOR TRANSFER oFTA MY STREET PARK PAGE 1 CITY OF MERIDIAN RESOLUTION NO. 24- BY THE CITY COUNCIL: CAVENER, LITTLE ROBERTS, OVERTON, STRADER, TAYLOR,WHITLOCK A RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE CONVEYANCE OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY FROM THE WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT; ACCEPTING THE TERMINATION OF THE WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT'S LEASE OF LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,the Western Ada Recreation District ("WARD") is the owner and steward of these recreational facilities and related holdings (collectively, "Assets"): 1) Real property located at 213 E. Franklin Road, in Meridian, currently developed as a swimming pool ("Pool"), 2) Real property located at 1031 E. Tammy Street, in Meridian, currently developed as a neighborhood park ("Park"), and 3) Personal property owned by WARD for the operation and maintenance of the Pool, the Park, and Lakeview Golf Course (located at 4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian, currently owned by City and developed as an 18-hole public golf course, driving range, pro shop, restaurant and related facilities ("Golf Course")) ("Personal Property"); WHEREAS,pursuant to an agreement entitled Assignment of Lease and Leasehold Improvements executed on November 6, 2020, WARD holds a leasehold interest in the Golf Course ("Lease"), which interest may be extinguished by quitclaim deed, pursuant to provision 9.I of the May 17, 2005 Assignment of Lease and Amended Lease Agreement for the Provision of Golf Course Operations at City of Meridian's Municipal Golf Course; WHEREAS,pursuant to Idaho Code section 67-2322 and the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets executed by WARD and the City on April 2, 2024, in exchange for consideration in the amount of one dollar($1.00), WARD seeks to convey the Assets to City and to terminate its Lease of the Golf Course; WHEREAS,by this resolution, the City Council of the City of Meridian seeks to ratify the conveyance of the Assets to City and accept the instrument terminating WARD's lease of the Golf Course; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City of Meridian gratefully accepts the Assets conveyed by WARD and intends to use them for the benefit of the Meridian community, and therefore ratifies the instruments conveying the Pool and Park, attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively, directs the City Clerk to record such instruments on September 30, 2024, and directs the Finance Department to mail consideration in the amount of one dollar($1.00) to WARD on September 30, 2024. RESOLUTION RATIFYING WARD'S PROPERTY CONVEYANCE AND ACCEPTING WARD'S TERMINATION OF GOLF COURSE LEASE PAGE 1 Section 2. That, as of September 30, 2024, the City of Meridian accepts WARD's conveyance of the Personal Property; to that end, will enter into the Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit C; and directs the Mayor to execute such Agreement on behalf of the City of Meridian. Section 3. That, as of September 30, 2024, the City of Meridian accepts WARD's tender of the quitclaim deed terminating WARD's lease of the Golf Course, attached hereto as Exhibit D; directs the City Clerk to record such instruments on September 30, 2024; and upon recording of the quitclaim deed, such lease shall be extinguished. Section 4. That, following Closing, as described in the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets executed by WARD and the City on April 2, 2024, the Director of the Meridian Parks and Recreation District is directed to exercise general administration and maintenance of the Pool, Park, Golf Course, and all real and personal property associated therewith, for the benefit of the Meridian community. Section 5. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption and approval. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of September, 2024. APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Meridian, Idaho, this 24th day of September, APPROVED: Robert E. Simison, Mayor ATTEST: By: Chris Johnson, City Clerk RESOLUTION RATIFYING WARD'S PROPERTY CONVEYANCE AND ACCEPTING WARD'S TERMINATION OF GOLF COURSE LEASE PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Grantor"),does hereby grant,bargain, sell, and convey unto the City of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose current address is 33 E.Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho("Grantee"), and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises,in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: See attached Exhibit 1. To have and to hold the said premises,together with all buildings, structures, improvements,fixtures, and appurtenances thereto, and any and all estate,right,title,interest, appurtenances,tenements,hereditaments,reversions,remainders, easements,rents,issues,profits, rights-of-way and water rights in anywise appertaining to the real property herein described,unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thiA of 2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION n � . ) ss: DISTRICT County of� ) Thtrecoras d w acknowledged before me on the�'ddaay ,2024,by Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the a ecreatio istrict,in his capacity as Board Shari Wardle, Board President r Notary Public f r Residing at ,Idaho ••. cam, F REF ,, My Commission Expires: Z L �d ��•' pTARy .ter • C� • C) ••. F Of .• QUITCLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PAGE 1 EXHIBIT 1 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Ada, State of Idaho, and is described as follows: A parcel of land, as shown on the Record of Survey No. 8737, on file under Instrument No.110021878 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho, lying in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 18, T.3N., R.lE., B.M.,Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the North 1/4 corner of said Section 18, marked by a brass cap; thence along the North line of said Section 18 South 89°20'05"West 1309.06 feet to the Northeast comer of Government Lot 1 of said Northwest 1/4 of Section 18 as shown on Record of Survey No. 2017 on file under Instrument No. 9168335 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho; thence along the East line of said Government Lot 1 South 00°40'03"West 414.24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, marked by an iron pin; thence continuing South 00"40'03"West 247.34 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 52°1T11" West 450.67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 00°40'03" East 11.43 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 87°14'16" East 173.69 feet to a point of curve, marked by an iron pin; thence along the arc of a curve to the left 55.71 feet, said curve having a radius of 66.00 feet, a central angle of 48°21'47", and a long chord bearing North 63°03'22"East 54.07 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence North 38°52'29" East 44.52 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 51°07'31" East 19.67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 38°52'29" West 16.49 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 51°52'37" East 133.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN: S 1118223084 QurrcLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PAGE 2 EXHIBIT B RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho("Grantor"),does hereby grant,bargain, sell, and convey to the City of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue,Meridian,Idaho("Grantee"),and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises,in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: Lot 14 in Block 2 of SETTLERS VILLAGE,a re-plat of the original Settlers Plat as vacated by the City of Meridian in April, 1981,according to the plat thereof,filed in Book 51 of Plats at Pages 4206 through 4209;and Amended by an Affidavit recorded August 3, 1984 as Instrument No. 8438997 and Affidavit recorded December 18,2007 as Instrument No. 107166403,Records of Ada County,Idaho. To have and to hold the said premises,together with all buildings, structures,improvements, fixtures,and appurtenances thereto,and any and all estate,right,title,interest,appurtenances,tenements, hereditaments,reversions,remainders,easements,rents,issues,profits,rights-of-way and water rights in anywise appertaining to the real property herein described,unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thisJday of 2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT ) ss: County of ) Thi record was acknowledged before me on the da of 2024,by Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the Shaun Wardle,Board President tA istrict,in his capacity as Board Presiden7 . """"�•.,, Notary Public r I o REE, , Residing at ,Idaho ;• :o. ]0,•:9�, My Commission xpires: 112,11)30 °y 0 N+Y •• C - �'�• Cam• /q Th OF QUITCLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF TAMMy STREET PARK PAGE 1 EXHIBIT C AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY This AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY ("Agreement") is made this_day of , 2024 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City"), and the Western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("WARD") (collectively, "Parties"). WHEREAS,WARD is the owner of personal property ("Personal Property") used for the operation and maintenance of the Community Swimming Pool, located at 213 E. Franklin Road, in Meridian ("Pool"), a neighborhood park located at 1031 E. Tammy Street, in Meridian ("Park"), and Lakeview Golf Course, located at 4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian ("Golf Course"); and, WHEREAS,pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets entered into by the Parties ("MOA"), by this Agreement WARD seeks to convey the Personal Property to City; and WHEREAS,by this Agreement City gratefully accepts the Personal Property and agrees to use the same for the benefit of the Meridian community; NOW, THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: I.WARD's CONVEYANCE. A. Convey Personal Property. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, WARD hereby conveys to City, free of charge, any and all Personal Property used for the operation and maintenance of the Pool, Park, and Golf Course. B. Certifications.WARD hereby certifies that: 1. WARD is not required to obtain the approval or consent of any person, firm, or other entity to permit WARD to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 2. WARD owns and possesses all rights, title, and interest in and to the Personal Property, free and clear of all covenants, conditions, easements, liens, and encumbrances. 3. There is no equitable, legal, or administrative suit, action, arbitration, or other proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting WARD or the Personal Property. H.CITY's ACCEPTANCE. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, City shall accept and own, without payment,WARD's conveyance of the Personal Property,pursuant to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, and shall take ownership and possession of the Personal Property upon Closing. AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD'S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 1 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Notice. All other notices required to be given by either of the Parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, addressed as follows : If to City : If to WARD . City Clerk Shaun Wardle, Board President City of Meridian Western Ada Recreation District 33 E . Broadway Avenue P . O . Box 566 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83680 B . Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon the Effective Date and shall expire upon Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, unless earlier extended or terminated as set forth herein . C. Assignment. Neither party shall assign or sublet all or any portion of its respective interest in this Agreement or any privilege or right hereunder, either voluntarily or involuntarily, without the prior written consent of the other party. This Agreement and each and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations , legal representative, successors , and assigns of the Parties . D. No agency. For purposes of or in furtherance of this Agreement, neither party nor its respective employees , agents , contractors, officials , officers , servants , guests , and/or invitees shall be considered agents of the other in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever. E. Liability. Each party shall be solely liable for the actions and/or inactions , including errors , omissions, and/or negligence of its own employees . Neither party shall bear any responsibility or liability for the errors , omissions , and/or negligence of the other. F. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, City and WARD shall comply with all applicable laws , ordinances , and codes of Federal, State, and local governments . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3 , of the Idaho Constitution . G. Termination. 1 . Grounds. Grounds for termination of this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to : non-appropriation of funds necessary to meet either party' s obligations under this Agreement ; an act or omission by either party which materially breaches any term of this Agreement; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance of the terms of this Agreement by either party ; or a change in or occurrence of circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 2 2 . Process. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) days ' notice of intention to terminate. Such notice shall include a description of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination . A fourteen ( 14) day cure period shall commence upon provision of the notice of intention to terminate . If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this Agreement may be terminated upon mailing of notice of termination . H. Construction and severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. I. Time of the essence. The Parties acknowledge obligations under this Agreement shall be fulfilled in a timely manner. The Parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. J. Third-party beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it in any way be interpreted or construed to create, any third-party beneficiary rights in any person or entity not a party hereto . K. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts , each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. L. No limitation. Nothing in this Agreement or any other agreement shall prevent or limit City, when City owns the Personal Property, from alienating or making any improvements or changes to the Personal Property or any component thereof, whether temporarily or permanently, as may be deemed by City to further the public interest, health, safety, and/or welfare. M. Authority. The Parties certify that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement has been duly approved in accordance with applicable laws and any documents or instruments governing the respective Parties , and that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement will not, with the passage of time, the giving of notice, or otherwise, cause either Party to be in violation or breach of any law, regulation, contract, agreement, or other restriction to or by which the Party or the personal property conveyed by this Agreement are subject or bound . N. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and WARD . The Parties signatory hereto represent and warrant that each is duly authorized to bind, respectively, City and WARD to this Agreement in all respects . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT: ShauffWardle, Board President CITY OF MERIDIAN: Robert E. Simison, Mayor Attest: Chris Johnson, City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD'S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 4 EXHIBIT D RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO. MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Grantor"), does hereby convey,release,remise and forever quitclaim unto the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose current address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho ("Grantee"), and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises, in Ada County, Idaho, to wit: See attached Exhibit 1: Lakeview Golf Course And including,but not limited to, Grantor's leasehold interest in said premises, if any (collectively, "Property"). To have and to hold the said Property, unto the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns,forever. IN WITNE S WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on this jg4ay of k ,2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss: DISTRICT County of ��± '� Thi record was acknowledged before me on the G-day ,2024 b Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the V�este a Recreation D' ct,in his capacity as Board Shan Wardle, Board President President. Notary Public for Nato Residing at Idaho Co F REtz4f , My Commission Expires: lgjgy�, i • ARY iT TE•OF`'�, I still" QUITCLAIM DEED—LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST iN LAKEvIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 1 EXIIIIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY Parcel I A parcel of land being a portion of the West half Section 3,Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian,Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 3 North,Range I West,Boise Meridian,Meridian,Ada County Idaho; thence along the Southerly boundary of said Northeast Quarter of Section 3 North 88155'29"West 2643.29 feet to a brass cap marking the Southwest comer of the Northeast Quarter; thence leaving said Southerly boundary North 75°30'00" West 190.00 feet to a 2" iron pipe; thence North 400001001,West 40.06 feet to an iron pin;thence South 75°59'31" West 70.00 feet to an iron pin; thence South 25000'00" West 64.19 feet to an iron pin;thence North 89025'06" West 254.51 feet to a point, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING;thence continuing North 89°25'06" West 100.01 feet to a point; thence South 00'30'11"West 407.92 feet to a point; thence South 68054'11" East 276.46 feet to a point marking a point of curve; thence along a curve to the right 59.46 feet, said curve having a central angle of 34°04'10", a radius of 100.00 feet, tangents of 30.64 feet and a long chord of 58.59 feet bearing South 51052'06"East to a point marking a point of tangents;thence South 34050'01"East 292.99 feet to a point;thence South 89°48'41" East 147.34 feet to a point; thence North 35°00'00" West 109.03 feet to a point; thence North 51°45'00"West 580.00 feet to a point;thence North 00°29'44"East 335.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel II A parcel of land lying in portions of the South half of the North half and the North half of the South half of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County,Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point marking the Northwest comer of the said North half of the South half of Section 3;thence South 89°25'06" East 2,077.73 feet along the Northerly boundary of the said North half of the South half of Section 3 to a point also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 0°29'44" West 335.18 feet to a point;thence South 51°45'00" East 580.00 feet to a point; thence South 35°00'00"East 285.33 feet to a point;thence South 220 15'00" West 60.05 feet to a point;thence QUITCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 2 South 43°58'10" East 238.75 feet to a point; thence South 29100'00"East 110.00 feet to a point;thence North 61°00'00" East 81.19 feet to a point of curve;thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 147.14 feet, said curve having a central angle of 48°10'28", a radius of 175.00 feet, tangents of 78.23 feet and a long chord of 142.84 feet bearing North 36°54'46" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 56°30'00" West 151.38 feet to a point; thence North 41°30'00" West 203.92 feet to a point; thence North 17*15'00" West 94.14 feet to a point;thence North 22°15'00" East 147.00 feet to a point; thence North 65°50'00" East 45.00 feet to a point; thence South 87120'00" East 78.40 feet to a point; thence South 68°00'00" East 61.48 feet to a point; thence South 71°33'25"East 88.05 feet to a point; thence South 60°00'00" East 108.33 feet to a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the right 139.32 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25*35'19", a radius of 311.95 feet,tangents of 70.84 feet and along chord of 138.16 feet bearing North 56°12'20"East to a point of tangent;thence North 69100'00"East 115.08 feet to a point of curve;thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 125.75 feet, said curve having a central angle of 24°25'22", a radius of 295.00 feet, tangents of 63.84 feet and a long chord of 124.80 feet bearing North 56'47'19" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 44°00'00" West 79.63 feet to a point;thence North 67°45'00" West 160.00 feet to a point; thence South 65°50'00" West 244.67 feet to a point; thence North 50°30'00" West 114.35 feet to a point; thence North 44°00'00" East 90.00 feet to a point; thence North 17°00'00" West 175.00 feet to a point; thence North 12000'00" East 280.00 feet to a point; thence North 77°30'00"West 170.00 feet to a point;thence South 68000'00" West 265.00 feet to a point marking the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of the said Section 3;thence North 75030'00" West 190.00 feet to a point; thence North 40100'00" West 40.00 feet to a point; thence South 75*59'31"West 70.00 feet to a point;thence South 25°00'00"West 64.19 feet to a point on the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3;thence North 89°25'06" West 254.51 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT that portion lying within the following subdivisions: Cherry Lane Village No. 1 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 and 3538,records of Ada County,Idaho; Cherry Lane Village No. 2 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792,records of Ada County,Idaho; The Lake at Cherry Lane,according to the plat thereof filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570,records of Ada County,Idaho; The Lake at Cherry Lane No.2,according to the plat thereof filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883,records of Ada County,Idaho; QUITCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 3 The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675,records of Ada County,Idaho. Parcel III-A A portion of the West half of Section 3,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9, 10 and the said Section 3;thence North 0°3 8'11"East 2651.19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972(CP&F Instrument No.7852146,records of Ada County,tdaho);from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38'27"East 2697.49 feet;thence North 0°38'27"East 22.64 feet to a 5/8"iron pin;thence South 88°5531" East 379.53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 88°55'31"East 182.65 feet to a point; thence South 8°18'10" East 440.66 feet to a point; thence South 16°18'25" West 218.04 feet to a point; thence North 89°13'51" East 540.22 feet to a point; thence North 71043134" East 442.46 feet to a point; thence North 10°33'50" East 487.84 feet to a point; thence South 88°55'31"East 124.84 feet to a point; thence South 50038'25" East 89.99 feet to a point; thence 165.33 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 250.25 feet, a central angle of 37°51'08", and a long chord bearing South 31°42'52"East 162.34 feet to a point; thence North 89029'44" West 120.24 feet to a point; thence South 4027'17"East 80.30 feet to a point;thence South 0030'16" West 230.52 feet to a point; thence South 10031'20" West 123.51 feet to a point; thence South 301 14'07" West 119.57 feet to a point; thence South 50150'29" West 134.39 feet to a point; thence South 71°2848" West 120.64 feet to a point; thence South 82045'52" West 225.84 feet to a point; thence South 89002'57" West 67.30 feet to a point; thence North 89010'41" West 825.06 feet to a point; thence North 77029'20"West 148.07 feet to a point;thence North 89'10'41"West 160.40 feet to a point lying 65.00 feet East of the West boundary of said Section 3;thence along a line 65.00 feet East of and parallel to the West boundary of said Section 3 North 0*38'11" East 247.64 feet to a point, thence South 89021'49" East 156.03 feet to a point; thence North 45°03'16"East 163.61 feet to a point;thence North 5°39'31" East 502.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. QUITCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 4 Parcel III-B A portion of the West half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0'38 ' 11 " East 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °3827" East 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0138 ' 27" East 22 .64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°56 ' 31 " East 1977 . 72 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence South 0°30 ' 15 " West 413 . 59 feet to a point; thence North 68 *54 ' 11 " West 26. 71 feet to a point; thence North 0*30 ' l 5 " East 217 . 93 feet to a point , thence 211 . 88 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 249 .75 feet, a central angle of 48°3625 " and a long chord bearing North 23 °47 ' 57" West 205 . 58 feet to a point ; thence South 88 °5531 " East 109.62 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel IV-A A portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West ; Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °3827" East 22.64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 379 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 5 °3931 " East, 290 , 28 feet to a point; thence 46. 45 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 250 .00 feet, a central angle of 10*38 ' 46" , and a long chord bearing South 49122 ' 43 " East, 46.39 feet to a point; thence South 44°03 ' 20" East, 136 . 41 feet to a point; thence South 8 * 18 ' 10" East, 165 . 80 feet to a point ; thence North 8805531 " West, 182 . 65 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel IV-B A portion of Government Lot 4 and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows : QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 5 Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 91 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet ; thence North 0°38 '27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 834. 71 feet to a point ; thence North 1104 '29" East, 77.45 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence 199 .31 feet along the are of curve to the right having a radius of 270.00 feet , a central angle of 42117 '41 and a long chord bearing North 65112 ' 11 " West, 194. 81 feet to a point; thence North 44°03 '20" West, 198 .06 feet to a point; thence North 37°38 ' 05 " East, 125 . 90 feet to a point; thence North 4 °26' 20" West, 178 .94 feet to a point; thence North 49° 13 '43 " West, 619. 18 feet to a point; thence North 89°21 ' 33 " West, 39 .72 feet to a point; thence North 013827" East, 178 ,61 feet to a point; thence South 89°21 ' 33 " East, 104 .94 feet to a point; thence North 26°46 ' 55" East, 463 . 73 feet to a point; thence North 13 °05 ' 08 " East, 186. 18 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 221 . 37 feet to a point; thence South 0 °3656" West, 30.00 feet to a point; thence North 89°23 ' 04" West, 114.43 feet to a point; thence South 10*38 ' 11 " West, 162 .48 feet to a point; thence South 5136 ' 09" East, 160.95 feet to a point; thence South 48°58 ' 55 " West, 66.41 feet to a point; thence South 10°49 ' 04" West, 123 .62 feet to a point; thence South 12°00 ' 00" East, 85.00 feet to a point; thence South 53 °26 '21 " East, 142 .60 feet to a point; thence South 6°51 ' 51 " West , 151 .05 feet to a point; thence South 41 ° 14 ' 14" East, 171 . 06 feet to a point; thence South 89° 12 '26" East, 122 .33 feet to a point ; thence South 43°03 ' 05 " East, 60. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 0°36 ' 15" West, 671 . 50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Parcel IV -C A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 , 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 ( CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8 ' iron pin; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1784 . 61 feet to a point; thence North 1 °04 ' 29" East, 303 . 15 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 66128 '40" West, 157 . 70 feet to a point ; thence QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 6 North 56056 ' 39" West, 717.37 feet to a point ; thence North 89023 ' 44" West, 36. 12 feet to a point ; thence North 0°36 '28 " East, 5 . 00 feet to a point; thence 154. 59 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 225 .00 feet, a central angle of 39°22 ' 00", and a long chord bearing North 19 °04 ' 45 " West, 151 . 57 feet to a point; thence North 38°45 ' 45 " West, 39 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 51 ° 14 ' 15 " East, 110 . 00 feet to a point; thence North 26° 11 ' 31 " West, 134. 78 feet to a point ; thence North 4004120" West, 277 .45 feet to a point; thence North 31 °46 ' 35 " West, 241 .56 feet to a point; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 132.59 feet to a point; thence North 89123 '04" West, 110 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 30. 00 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 175 .94 feet to a point; thence South 78005 '29" East, 71 . 13 feet to a point; thence South 63013 ' 16 " East, 65 . 34 feet to a point; thence South 56°28 ' 32" East, 79 . 07 feet to a point ; thence South 53015 ' 09 " East, 86 . 07 feet to a point, thence South 42 *31 ' 18" East, 70.53 feet to a point; thence South 35 °28 ' 22" East, 7T08 feet to a point ; thence South 5049 ' 06" East, 249 . 89 feet to a point; thence South 8 ° 16 '07" East, 125 .42 feet to a point; thence South 13 °56 ' 20" East, 266.06 feet to a point; thence South 42143 ' 29" East, 283 .07 feet to a point; thence North 61 °49 ' 13" East, 165 .37 feet to a point; thence North 11100 ' 42" West, 399. 24 feet to a point ; thence South 89018 ' 49" East, 398 .40 feet to a point; thence South 79°02 ' 15 " East, 61 . 16 feet to a point ; thence South 60*40 ' 15 " East, 164.39 feet to a point; thence South 85° 10 ' 18 " East, 136.30 feet to a point; thence South 0'30 ' 15 " West, 235 .93 feet to a point; thence North 89129 '45 " West, 80. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 78033 '49" West, 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence South 11 °45 ' 15 " West, 185 . 77 feet to a point ; thence South 0°30 ' 15" West, 154. 10 feet to a point, thence 288 . 86 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 38 °56 ' 31 and a long chord bearing South 63004 ' 11 " West, 283 .33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , EXCEPTING THEREFROM ; A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast comer of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3 , South 00°27 ' 29" West 1 , 365 .57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast comer of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEwGOLF COURSE PAGE 7 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, North 89° 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest comer of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision; thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486 . 13 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence continuing along said Westerly boundary, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 19. 38 feet to a point; thence leaving said Northwesterly boundary, North 89°29 '45 " West 79.95 feet to a point; thence South 78 °33 ' 49 ' West 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence North 11 °45 '06 " East 20. 62 feet to a point; thence North 78 °53 ' 05" East 183 .47 feet to a point; thence South 89°29 ' 54" East 74. 99 feet to the Point of Beginning. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM . A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho and more particularly described as follows ; Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West , Boise Meridian, Meridian Ada County , Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3, South 00°27 '2 . 9" West 1 ,365. 57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, North 89* 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest corner of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision, thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486. 13 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving said Westerly boundary North 89°29 ' 54" West 74 . 97 feet to an iron pin; thence South 78 °53 ' 05 " West 183 .47 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence South 11 °45 ' 06" West 206. 39 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 00°30 ' 06" West 154. 08 feet to an iron pin, thence Southwesterly 24. 54 feet along the arc of a curve to the left said curve having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 03118 '29", and a long chord bearing South 80°53 '03 " West 24. 54 feet, to a point on the Easterly right of way of the Eight Mile Lateral ; thence along said Easterly right of way North 00°42 ' 19" East 347 .61 feet to a point ; thence leaving said Easterly said right of way North 78153 ' 05" East 64.54 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER,INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 8 Parcel IV -D A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 098 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0138 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet; thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1614 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 10'33 '50" East, 72 . 37 feet to a point; thence 129 . 52 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 600. 00 feet, a central angle of 12 °22 '07", and a long chord bearing South 56°49 ' 29" East, 129.27 feet to a point; thence South 50°3825" East, 4 . 33 feet to a point; thence North 88 °5531 " West, 124 . 84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 9 Parcel IV -E A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows. Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4 , 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 *38 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet, thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88 °55 '31 " East, 1977.72 feet to a 5/8" iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 88 °55 ' 31 " West 109. 62 feet to a point; thence 11 . 06 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 249. 75 feet, a central angle of 2132 ' 16 ", and a long chord hearing North 49°22 ' 17" West , 11 .06 feet to a point, thence North 50°38 ' 25 " West, 94 .32 feet to a point ; thence 60 .45 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 680. 00 feet, a central angle of 5 °05 '36", and a long chord bearing North 53 ° 11 ' l3 " West, 60.43 feet to a point; thence 30. 13 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a central angle of 86° 18 ' 50", and a long chord bearing North 12°34 ' 36" West, 27 . 36 feet to a point ; thence North 30°34 ' 50" East, 84 . 13 feet to a point; thence 269 . 77 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 375 , 00 feel, a central angle of 41 * 13 ' 04", and a long chord bearing North 51 ° 11 '21 " East , 263 .99 feet to a point; thence South 0 °30 ' 15 " West, 369. 89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , Parcel V Lots I and 52 in Block 5 , and Lot I 1 in Block 9 of Cherry Lane Village No . I Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 through 3538 , records of Ada County, Idaho. Parcel VI Lots 12 and 21 in Block 9 and Lot 4 in Block I I and Lot 53 in Block 5 of Cherry Lane Village No . 2 Subdivision , according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792 , records of Ada County , Idaho. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 10 Parcel VII Lot 83 in Block 5 and Lot 14, in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5473 through 5475 , records of Ada County, Idaho . EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Lot 83 in Block 5 of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision located in the SE '/+ of Section 3 , T. 3N . , R . I W. , B . M . , Ada County , Idaho, and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast comer of said SE %, ; thence North 00' 19 ' 11 " East 451 . 29 feet along the Easterly boundary of said SE '/. and the centerline of Ten Mile Road to a point marking the intersection of the centerline of the proposed Woodmont Drive and said centerline of Ten Mile Road ; thence along the following courses and distances along said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive ; North 89'40 '49" West 136 . 00 feet to a point of curve ; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the right 54 .87 feet, said curve having a central angle of 21 °40 ' 49", a radius of 145 . 00 feet, tangents of 27. 77 feet and a long chord of 54 . 54 feet bearing North 78050 ' 25 " West to a point of tangent; thence North 68 °00 ' 00" West 171 .40 feet to a point of curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the left 78 . 86 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25 °49 ' 14", a radius of 175 . 00 feet, tangents of 40 . 11 feet and a long chord of 78. 20 feet bearing North 80 °54 ' 37" West to a point of ending of curve; thence leaving said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive along a non- tangent line, South 05035 ' 15 " West 25 .40 feet to a point marking the Northwesterly corner of Lot 84, Block 5 of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No . 3 Subdivision, also said point being on the Southwesterly right-of--way line of said proposed Woodmont Drive, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 05 ' 35 ' 15 " West 66 . 64 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Lot 84, Block 5 to a point marking the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 84, Block 5, also said point being on the Southerly boundary of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision; thence North 60°50 '49" West 3 .00 feet along said Southerly boundary of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision to a point ; thence leaving said Southerly boundary , North 05 * 13 ' 51 " West 62 .96 feet to a point on said Southerly right-of--way line of proposed Woodmont Drive, also said point being a point on curve; thence Northeasterly along a non-tangent curve to the right along said Southerly right-of-- way line of proposed Woodmont Drive 15 .01 feet, said curve having a central angle of 05 °44 ' 02", a radius of 150. 00 feet, tangents of 7 . 51 feet and a long chord of 15 . 00 feet bearing North 81 °4336" East to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel VIII Lot 28 in Block I I and Lot 39 in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No . 4 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 63 of Plats at Pages 6376 and 6377, records of Ada County, Idaho, QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE I I Parcel IX Lot 9 in Block l of Record of Survey No. 802 of adjusted lot lines for Lots 8 , 9 and 10, in Block l of The Lake at Cherry Lane, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570, records of Ada County , Idaho. EXCEPT that portion lying within the original Lot 8 . Parcel X Lot 5 in Block 1 and Lot 13 in Block 2, The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 2, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XI Lot 24 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 70 of Plats at Pages 7167 and 7168 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XII Lot 19 in Block 1 and Lot 46 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Page 7674 and 7675 , records of Ada County, Idaho . QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 12 ADVERTISING PROOF IDAHO PRESS MER7DfAN PRE55 c/o ISj Payment Processing Center L.ocai ive.�s w zct�Ho1a,n ..,,. �� Emmett PO Box 1570, BOISEWEEKLY® Messenger Pocatello,ID 83204 Ph. (208)465-8129 Fax: (907)452-5054 BILLING DATE: ACCOUNT NO: LEGAL NOTICE 09/06/24 21410 CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY 1 MERIDIAN, CITY OF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- 33 E. BROADWAYAVENUE EN, pursuant to Idaho Code MERIDIAN, ID 83642 sections 67-2322 and 67- 2323, that the Meridian City Council will meet at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, September 24, 2024,at Meridian City Hall,33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridi- an, Idaho,to ratify instruments AD# DESCRIPTION START STOP TIMES AMOUNT transferring real and personal property from the Western 556584 PH 9/24/2024 09/10/24 09/17/24 4 $103.84 Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian.The following will be before the City Council for consideration: 1. Quitclaim Deed, by which Western Ada Recreation Dis- trict will convey to the City of Meridian the Meridian Com- munity Swimming Pool, locat- ed at 213 E. Franklin Road, Meridian, Idaho. 2.Quitclaim Deed, by which Western Ada Recreation Dis- trict will convey to the City of Meridian real property located at 1031 E.Tammy Street. 3.Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property, by which Western Ada Recreation Dis- trict will convey all personal property at the Meridian Com- munity Swimming Pool, Tam- my Street Park, and Lakeview Golf Course to the City of Me- ridian. In consideration for the transfer of this real and per- sonal property, the City of Meridian will pay Western Ada Recreation District one dollar ($1.00). Copies of the instruments to be considered are available by contacting the Meridian Parks and Rec- PaymentS: reation Department by tele- phone at 208-888-3579 or by e-mail at: Date Method Card Type Last 4 Digits Check Amount recreation @ meridiancity.org. DATED this 4th day of September,2024. Discount: $0.00 Gross:$103.84 Chris Johnson,CITY CLERK Surcharge: $0.00 Paid Amount:$0.00 September 10, 17,2024 Credits: $0.00 556584 Amount Due:$103.84 We Appreciate Your Business! AD#556584 ADVERTISING PROOF IDAHO PRESS MER7DfAN PRE55 c/o ISj Payment Processing Center L.ocai ive.�s w zct�Ho1a,n ..,,. �� Emmett PO Box 1570, BOISEWEEKLY® Messenger Pocatello,ID 83204 Ph. (208)465-8129 Fax: (907)452-5054 BILLING DATE: ACCOUNT NO: LEGAL NOTICE 08/12/24 21410 WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT NOTICE OF AGREEMENT TO CONVEY PROPERTY 1 MERIDIAN, CITY OF NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- 33 E. BROADWAYAVENUE EN, pursuant to Idaho Code MERIDIAN, ID 83642 sections 67-2322 and 67- 2323, that the Board of the Western Ada Recreation Dis- trict will meet at 12:00 p.m., on Wednesday, August 28, 2024, at the Meridian Com- munity Pool, 213 E. Franklin AD# DESCRIPTION START STOP TIMES AMOUNT Road, Meridian, Idaho,to rati- fy instruments transferring real 547044 PH 8/28/2024 08/15/24 08/22/24 4 $101.08 and personal property from the Western Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian. The following will be before the Board for consideration and approval: 1. Quitclaim Deed, by which Western Ada Recreation Dis- trict will convey to the City of Meridian the Meridian Com- munity Swimming Pool, locat- ed at 213 E. Franklin Road, Meridian, Idaho. 2.Quitclaim Deed, by which Western Ada Recreation Dis- trict will convey to the City of Meridian real property located at 1031 E.Tammy Street. 3.Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property, by which Western Ada Recreation Dis- trict will convey all personal property at the Meridian Com- munity Swimming Pool, Tam- my Street Park, and Lakeview Golf Course to the City of Me- ridian. In consideration for the transfer of this real and per- sonal property, the City of Meridian will pay Western Ada Recreation District one dollar ($1.00). Copies of the instruments to be considered are available by contacting the Meridian Parks and Rec- reation Department by tele- phone at 208-888-3579 or by Payments: e-mail at recreation @ meridiancity.org. Date Method Card Type Last 4 Digits Check Amount DATED this day of ,2024. Chris Johnson,CITY CLERK Discount: $0.00 Gross:$101.08 August 15,22,2024 Surcharge: $0.00 Paid Amount:$0.00 547044 Credits: $0.00 Amount Due:$101.08 We Appreciate Your Business! AD#547044 CITY OF MERIDIAN NOTICE OF AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Idaho Code sections 67-2322 and 67-2323, that the Meridian City Council will meet at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, September 24, 2024, at Meridian City Hall, 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho, to ratify instruments transferring real and personal property from the Western Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian. The following will be before the City Council for consideration: 1. Quitclaim Deed, by which Western Ada Recreation District will convey to the City of Meridian the Meridian Community Swimming Pool, located at 213 E. Franklin Road, Meridian, Idaho. 2. Quitclaim Deed, by which Western Ada Recreation District will convey to the City of Meridian real property located at 1031 E. Tammy Street. 3. Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property, by which Western Ada Recreation District will convey all personal property at the Meridian Community Swimming Pool, Tammy Street Park, and Lakeview Golf Course to the City of Meridian. In consideration for the transfer of this real and personal property, the City of Meridian will pay Western Ada Recreation District one dollar ($1.00). Copies of the instruments to be considered are available by contacting the Meridian Parks and Recreation Department by telephone at 208- 888-3579 or by e-mail at recreation@meridiancity.org. DATED this 4th day of September, 2024. Chris Johnson, CITY CLERK PUBLISH on September 10, 2024 and September 17, 2024. ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024_054698 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=2 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:12 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIANGITYCLERK " 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 " QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho("Grantor"),does hereby grant,bargain, sell,--and convey unto the City" of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State-of Idaho,-whose current address is 33 E.-Broadway Avenue,Meridian, Idaho("Grantee") and its successors and assigns " forever,the following described premises,in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: See attached Exhibit I. To have-and to hold the said premises,together with all buildings, structures, in�iprovements,fixtures, and appurtenances thereto, and any and all estate,right,title,interest, appurtenances,tenements,hereditaments,reversions,remainders, easements.-rents,issues,profits, rights-of-_way and water"rights-in anywise appertaining to the real property herein described;unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever. IN WHNESS WFIEREQF',the Grantor has executed this instrument on thi day of 2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF lDAHO WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss. ISTRICT County of ) Thi record was acknowledged before me on the `day of 2024,by Shaun'Wardle,=on behalf of the" ` �-� West a ecreatio istrict"in leis capacity-as Board h Wardle;Board President Presi ent♦ Notary Public fpr Residing at �• ,Idaho ��W0•� o My Commission Expires: � y -ov y c- Qulr rCLA DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PA43E 1 EXHIBIT 1 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Ada, State of Idaho , and is described as follows : A parcel of land, as shown on the Record of Survey No . 8737 , on file under Instrument No . 110021878 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho, lying in the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 18 , T . 3N. , R. lE. , B .M. , Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows : COMMENCING at the North 1 /4 corner of said Section 18 , marked by a brass cap ; thence along the North line of said Section 18 South 89 °20 '05 " West 1309 . 06 feet to the Northeast comer of Government Lot 1 of said Northwest 1 /4 of Section 18 as shown on Record of Survey No . 2017 on file under Instrument No . 9168335 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho ; thence along the East line of said Government Lot 1 South 00 °40'03 " West 414 . 24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, marked by an iron pin ; thence continuing South 00 "40'03 " West 247 . 34 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 52° 1T11 " West 450 . 67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 00 °40 '03 " East 11 .43 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 87 ° 14 ' 16 " East 173 . 69 feet to a point of curve, marked by an iron pin ; thence along the arc of a curve to the left 55 . 71 feet, said curve having a radius of 66 . 00 feet, a central angle of 48 °21 '47 " , and a long chord bearing North 63 °03 '22 " East 54 . 07 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 38 °52 '29 " East 44 . 52 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 51 ° 07 '31 " East 19 . 67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence South 38 ° 52'29 " West 16 .49 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence South 51 °52'37 " East 133 . 04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN : S 1118223084 QurrcLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PAGE 2 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-054699 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=1 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RE ORDEVGRWLTESTEDBYANI} WHEN RECORDED RET URN T0: PMDLW CITY CLERif 33E.Broadway Avenue Meridian;=ldfaha 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized-under the laws of the State"of Idaho("Grantor"),-"does hereby grant,bargain,sell, and convey to the City of Meridian;a muiucipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue;Meridian;Idaho("Grantee"),and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises;in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: "Lot 14 in Block 2 of SETTLERS VILLAGE, a re-plat of the original Settlers Plat as vacated by the City of Meridian in April, according to the plat thereof,filled in-Book 51 of Plats at Pages 4206 through 4209;and Amended by an Affidavit recorded August"3, 1984 as:Instrument No. 8438997 and Affidavit recorded December 18,2007 as Instrument No. 107166403 -Records of Ada County,-Idaho.-. To have and to:hold the said premises;together with all buildings,structures,improvements, fixtures,and appurtenances thereto,and any and all estate,right,title,interest,appurtenances;tenements, hereditaments,reversions,remainders,easements,rents,issues,profits,rights-of-way acid water,rights-in anywise appertaining to:the reel property herein described,unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever: , WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thi _ ay of 2024. GRA NTOR: :. STATE OF IDAHO � WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT ) ss:- County of ) Th4reco_ rd was acknowledged beftare me on the day of2024,by Shaun Wardle,:on behalf of the----- istrict, his capacity as Board Shaun Wardle,Board President Presiders Notary Public r I llo Residing at Idaho �.�. z - .� My Commission xpires: 7LBee- OmcT.I�ilvi DEED FOR TRANSFER oFTA MY STREET PARK PAGE 1 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-054700 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=12 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RECORDING REQUESTED BYANI? WHEN RECORDED RETURNTQ: MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue MeAllan,Idaho$3642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the-laws of the-State-of Idaho -'Grantor") does hereby convey,release,remise and forever quitclaim unto"the City of Meridian., a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose current address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian-,Idaho("Grantee") anal its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises, in Ada County;Idaho; to unit: See attached Exhibit 1: Lakeview Golf Course -And including,but not limited to, Grantor's leasehold interest in said premises, if any = ' (collectively,"Property"). To have and to hold the said Property, unto the said Grantee-,and , +Grantee's heirs and assigns,forever. IN WITNE S EREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on this ay of 2024 NTOR: .. STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss: DISTRICT County of Thi record was acknowledged before me on the y _. of 2024 b Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the �� Weste a Recreation D' ict,in his capacity as Board ha n Wardle;:Board President President. Notary Public for o Residing at Idaho My Commission Expires: .� �'• ADZ � s QUffCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEviEw GOLF COURSE . . ,PAGE l ; RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E. Broadway Avenue Meridian, Idaho 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received, the Western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("Grantor"), does hereby convey, release, remise and forever quitclaim unto the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, whose current address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian, Idaho (" Grantee") , and its successors and assigns forever, the following described premises, in Ada County, Idaho, to wit: See attached Exhibit l : Lakeview Golf Course And including, but not limited to , Grantor' s leasehold interest in said premises , if any (collectively, "Property") . To have and to hold the said Property, unto the said Grantee , and Grantee ' s heirs and assigns, forever. IN WITNE S WHEREOF , the Grantor has executed this instrument on this Od4ay of 4 , 2024 . GRANTOR: STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss : DISTRICT county of �Ar ) Thi record was nD ' et, e on thePday of , e, on behalf of the We`ste a Re capacity as Board Shan Wardle, Board President President. Notary Public fo Residing at OCA , Idaho FREE Z •'� c> . •••.. . ••�'J� ''., My Commission Expires : ' ro , Ipj19 •• /1j ; ; ; • O� ARY ; ,''•:STATE 0 �.• QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST iN LAKEvIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 1 EXIIIIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY Parcel I A parcel of land being a portion of the West half Section 3 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows ; Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County Idaho ; thence along the Southerly boundary of said Northeast Quarter of Section 3 North 88055129" West 2643 .29 feet to a brass cap marking the Southwest comer of the Northeast Quarter; thence leaving said Southerly boundary North 75 °30 ' 00" West 190 .00 feet to a 2 " iron pipe ; thence North 400001001 , West 40 . 06 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 75 °59 ' 31 " West 70 . 00 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 25000 ' 00" West 64. 19 feet to an iron pin ; thence North 89°25 ' 06" West 254 . 51 feet to a point, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing North 89°25 ' 06" West 100.01 feet to a point ; thence South 00'30 ' 11 " West 407. 92 feet to a point ; thence South 68054 ' 11 " East 276.46 feet to a point marking a point of curve ; thence along a curve to the right 59.46 feet, said curve having a central angle of 34°04 ' 10", a radius of 100 . 00 feet, tangents of 30.64 feet and a long chord of 58 . 59 feet bearing South 51 °52 ' 06" East to a point marking a point of tangents; thence South 34050 ' 01 " East 292. 99 feet to a point ; thence South 89°48 '41 " East 147 .34 feet to a point ; thence North 35 °00 ' 00" West 109 . 03 feet to a point; thence North 51 °45 ' 00" West 580.00 feet to a point; thence North 00129 '44 " East 335 . 18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel II A parcel of land lying in portions of the South half of the North half and the North half of the South half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point marking the Northwest comer of the said North half of the South half of Section 3 ; thence South 89°25 ' 06" East 2 ,077 .73 feet along the Northerly boundary of the said North half of the South half of Section 3 to a point also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence South 0°29 '44" West 335 . 18 feet to a point ; thence South 51 °45 ' 00" East 580 . 00 feet to a point; thence South 35°00 '00" East 285 . 33 feet to a point; thence South 22 ° 15 ' 00" West 60.05 feet to a point ; thence QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 2 South 4305810" East 238 . 75 feet to a point; thence South 29000 ' 00" East 110.00 feet to a point, thence North 61 000 ' 00" East 81 . 19 feet to a point of curves thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 147. 14 feet , said curve having a central angle of 48010 '28", a radius of 175 . 00 feet, tangents of 78 . 23 feet and a long chord of 142. 84 feet bearing North 36054 '46" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 56030 '00" West 151 . 38 feet to a point; thence North 41 °30 '00" West 203 .92 feet to a point , thence North 17* 15 '00" West 94 . 14 feet to a point; thence North 22° 15 '00" East 147.00 feet to a point; thence North 65050 '00" East 45 .00 feet to a point; thence South 87 °20 '00" East 78 .40 feet to a point; thence South 68°00 '00" East 61 .48 feet to a point ; thence South 71033 '25 " East 88.05 feet to a point ; thence South 60°00 ' 00" East 108 .33 feet to a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the right 139. 32 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25035 ' l 9", a radius of 311 .95 feet, tangents of 70. 84 feet and along chord of 138 . 16 feet bearing North 56° 12 ' 20" East to a point of tangent, thence North 69100 ' 00" East 115 .08 feet to a point of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 125 . 75 feet, said curve having a central angle of 24°25 ' 22", a radius of 295 .00 feet, tangents of 63 . 84 feet and a long chord of 124.80 feet bearing North 56'47 ' 19" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 44000 '00" West 79.63 feet to a point; thence North 67°45 ' 00" West 160. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 65°50 ' 00" West 244 .67 feet to a point; thence North 50°30 '00" West 114 . 35 feet to a point ; thence North 44°00 '00" East 90.00 feet to a point; thence North 17 °00 ' 00" West 175 . 00 feet to a point; thence North 12°00 '00" East 280. 00 feet to a point; thence North 77°30 ' 00" West 170.00 feet to a point ; thence South 68°00' 00" West 265 .00 feet to a point marking the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of the said Section 3 ; thence North 75 °30 ' 00" West 190.00 feet to a point ; thence North 40100 ' 00" West 40 .00 feet to a point; thence South 75 °59 ' 31 " West 70.00 feet to a point; thence South 25 °00 ' 00" West 64 . 19 feet to a point on the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3 ; thence North 89025106" West 254 . 51 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3 to the POINT OF BEGINNING . EXCEPT that portion lying within the following subdivisions : Cherry Lane Village No. 1 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 and 3538 , records of Ada County, Idaho; Cherry Lane Village No . 2 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792, records of Ada County, Idaho, The Lake at Cherry Lane, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570 , records of Ada County, Idaho , The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 2, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883 , records of Ada County , Idaho ; QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 3 The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , records of Ada County , Idaho . Parcel III-A A portion of the West half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4 , 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0°3 8 ' 11 " East 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County ,tdaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East 2697 . 49 feet ; thence North 0°38 '27" East 22 .64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin ; thence South 88 °5531 " East 379.53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence continuing South 88 °55 ' 31 " East 182. 65 feet to a point ; thence South 8 ° 18 ' 10" East 440. 66 feet to a point; thence South 16° 18 ' 25 " West 218 .04 feet to a point; thence North 89° 13 ' 51 " East 540. 22 feet to a point; thence North 71 °43 ' 34" East 442 .46 feet to a point , thence North 10°33 ' 50" East 487 . 84 feet to a point, thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East 124 . 84 feet to a point; thence South 500381251, East 89.99 feet to a point ; thence 165 . 33 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 250.25 feet, a central angle of 37°51 ' 08", and a long chord bearing South 31 °42 ' 52" East 162 .34 feet to a point ; thence North 89°29 ' 44" West 120 . 24 feet to a point ; thence South 4027 ' l 7" East 80 . 30 feet to a point; thence South 0°30 ' 16" West 230. 52 feet to a points thence South 10131 ' 20" West 123 .51 feet to a point; thence South 301 14 ' 07" West 119.57 feet to a point; thence South 50050 ' 29" West 134 . 39 feet to a point; thence South 71 °2848 " West 120 .64 feet to a point ; thence South 82°45 ' 52" West 225 . 84 feet to a point; thence South 89°02 ' 57" West 67 .30 feet to a points thence North 89° 10 ' 41 West 825 . 06 feet to a point; thence North 77°29 ' 20" West 148 .07 feet to a point, thence North 89 ° 10 ' 41 " West 160.40 feet to a point lying 65 . 00 feet East of the West boundary of said Section 3 , thence along a line 65 .00 feet East of and parallel to the West boundary of said Section 3 North 0°38 ' 11 East 247 .64 feet to a point, thence South 89°21 ' 49" East 156. 03 feet to a point; thence North 45°03 ' 16" East 163 . 61 feet to a point; thence North 5 °39 '31 " East 502.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 4 Parcel III-B A portion of the West half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0'38 ' 11 " East 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °3827" East 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0138 ' 27" East 22 .64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°56 ' 31 " East 1977 . 72 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence South 0°30 ' 15 " West 413 . 59 feet to a point; thence North 68 *54 ' 11 " West 26. 71 feet to a point; thence North 0*30 ' l 5 " East 217 . 93 feet to a point , thence 211 . 88 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 249 .75 feet, a central angle of 48°3625 " and a long chord bearing North 23 °47 ' 57" West 205 . 58 feet to a point ; thence South 88 °5531 " East 109.62 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel IV-A A portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West ; Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °3827" East 22.64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 379 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 5 °3931 " East, 290 , 28 feet to a point; thence 46. 45 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 250 .00 feet, a central angle of 10*38 ' 46" , and a long chord bearing South 49122 ' 43 " East, 46.39 feet to a point; thence South 44°03 ' 20" East, 136 . 41 feet to a point; thence South 8 * 18 ' 10" East, 165 . 80 feet to a point ; thence North 8805531 " West, 182 . 65 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel IV-B A portion of Government Lot 4 and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows : QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 5 Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 91 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet ; thence North 0°38 '27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 834. 71 feet to a point ; thence North 1104 '29" East, 77.45 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence 199 .31 feet along the are of curve to the right having a radius of 270.00 feet , a central angle of 42117 '41 and a long chord bearing North 65112 ' 11 " West, 194. 81 feet to a point; thence North 44°03 '20" West, 198 .06 feet to a point; thence North 37°38 ' 05 " East, 125 . 90 feet to a point; thence North 4 °26' 20" West, 178 .94 feet to a point; thence North 49° 13 '43 " West, 619. 18 feet to a point; thence North 89°21 ' 33 " West, 39 .72 feet to a point; thence North 013827" East, 178 ,61 feet to a point; thence South 89°21 ' 33 " East, 104 .94 feet to a point; thence North 26°46 ' 55" East, 463 . 73 feet to a point; thence North 13 °05 ' 08 " East, 186. 18 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 221 . 37 feet to a point; thence South 0 °3656" West, 30.00 feet to a point; thence North 89°23 ' 04" West, 114.43 feet to a point; thence South 10*38 ' 11 " West, 162 .48 feet to a point; thence South 5136 ' 09" East, 160.95 feet to a point; thence South 48°58 ' 55 " West, 66.41 feet to a point; thence South 10°49 ' 04" West, 123 .62 feet to a point; thence South 12°00 ' 00" East, 85.00 feet to a point; thence South 53 °26 '21 " East, 142 .60 feet to a point; thence South 6°51 ' 51 " West , 151 .05 feet to a point; thence South 41 ° 14 ' 14" East, 171 . 06 feet to a point; thence South 89° 12 '26" East, 122 .33 feet to a point ; thence South 43°03 ' 05 " East, 60. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 0°36 ' 15" West, 671 . 50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Parcel IV -C A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 , 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 ( CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8 ' iron pin; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1784 . 61 feet to a point; thence North 1 °04 ' 29" East, 303 . 15 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 66128 '40" West, 157 . 70 feet to a point ; thence QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 6 North 56056 ' 39" West, 717.37 feet to a point ; thence North 89023 ' 44" West, 36. 12 feet to a point ; thence North 0°36 '28 " East, 5 . 00 feet to a point; thence 154. 59 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 225 .00 feet, a central angle of 39°22 ' 00", and a long chord bearing North 19 °04 ' 45 " West, 151 . 57 feet to a point; thence North 38°45 ' 45 " West, 39 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 51 ° 14 ' 15 " East, 110 . 00 feet to a point; thence North 26° 11 ' 31 " West, 134. 78 feet to a point ; thence North 4004120" West, 277 .45 feet to a point; thence North 31 °46 ' 35 " West, 241 .56 feet to a point; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 132.59 feet to a point; thence North 89123 '04" West, 110 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 30. 00 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 175 .94 feet to a point; thence South 78005 '29" East, 71 . 13 feet to a point; thence South 63013 ' 16 " East, 65 . 34 feet to a point; thence South 56°28 ' 32" East, 79 . 07 feet to a point ; thence South 53015 ' 09 " East, 86 . 07 feet to a point, thence South 42 *31 ' 18" East, 70.53 feet to a point; thence South 35 °28 ' 22" East, 7T08 feet to a point ; thence South 5049 ' 06" East, 249 . 89 feet to a point; thence South 8 ° 16 '07" East, 125 .42 feet to a point; thence South 13 °56 ' 20" East, 266.06 feet to a point; thence South 42143 ' 29" East, 283 .07 feet to a point; thence North 61 °49 ' 13" East, 165 .37 feet to a point; thence North 11100 ' 42" West, 399. 24 feet to a point ; thence South 89018 ' 49" East, 398 .40 feet to a point; thence South 79°02 ' 15 " East, 61 . 16 feet to a point ; thence South 60*40 ' 15 " East, 164.39 feet to a point; thence South 85° 10 ' 18 " East, 136.30 feet to a point; thence South 0'30 ' 15 " West, 235 .93 feet to a point; thence North 89129 '45 " West, 80. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 78033 '49" West, 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence South 11 °45 ' 15 " West, 185 . 77 feet to a point ; thence South 0°30 ' 15" West, 154. 10 feet to a point, thence 288 . 86 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 38 °56 ' 31 and a long chord bearing South 63004 ' 11 " West, 283 .33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , EXCEPTING THEREFROM ; A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast comer of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3 , South 00°27 ' 29" West 1 , 365 .57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast comer of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEwGOLF COURSE PAGE 7 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, North 89° 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest comer of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision; thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486 . 13 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence continuing along said Westerly boundary, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 19. 38 feet to a point; thence leaving said Northwesterly boundary, North 89°29 '45 " West 79.95 feet to a point; thence South 78 °33 ' 49 ' West 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence North 11 °45 '06 " East 20. 62 feet to a point; thence North 78 °53 ' 05" East 183 .47 feet to a point; thence South 89°29 ' 54" East 74. 99 feet to the Point of Beginning. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM . A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho and more particularly described as follows ; Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West , Boise Meridian, Meridian Ada County , Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3, South 00°27 '2 . 9" West 1 ,365. 57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, North 89* 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest corner of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision, thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486. 13 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving said Westerly boundary North 89°29 ' 54" West 74 . 97 feet to an iron pin; thence South 78 °53 ' 05 " West 183 .47 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence South 11 °45 ' 06" West 206. 39 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 00°30 ' 06" West 154. 08 feet to an iron pin, thence Southwesterly 24. 54 feet along the arc of a curve to the left said curve having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 03118 '29", and a long chord bearing South 80°53 '03 " West 24. 54 feet, to a point on the Easterly right of way of the Eight Mile Lateral ; thence along said Easterly right of way North 00°42 ' 19" East 347 .61 feet to a point ; thence leaving said Easterly said right of way North 78153 ' 05" East 64.54 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER,INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 8 Parcel IV -D A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 098 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0138 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet; thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1614 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 10'33 '50" East, 72 . 37 feet to a point; thence 129 . 52 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 600. 00 feet, a central angle of 12 °22 '07", and a long chord bearing South 56°49 ' 29" East, 129.27 feet to a point; thence South 50°3825" East, 4 . 33 feet to a point; thence North 88 °5531 " West, 124 . 84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 9 Parcel IV -E A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows. Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4 , 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 *38 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet, thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88 °55 '31 " East, 1977.72 feet to a 5/8" iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 88 °55 ' 31 " West 109. 62 feet to a point; thence 11 . 06 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 249. 75 feet, a central angle of 2132 ' 16 ", and a long chord hearing North 49°22 ' 17" West , 11 .06 feet to a point, thence North 50°38 ' 25 " West, 94 .32 feet to a point ; thence 60 .45 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 680. 00 feet, a central angle of 5 °05 '36", and a long chord bearing North 53 ° 11 ' l3 " West, 60.43 feet to a point; thence 30. 13 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a central angle of 86° 18 ' 50", and a long chord bearing North 12°34 ' 36" West, 27 . 36 feet to a point ; thence North 30°34 ' 50" East, 84 . 13 feet to a point; thence 269 . 77 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 375 , 00 feel, a central angle of 41 * 13 ' 04", and a long chord bearing North 51 ° 11 '21 " East , 263 .99 feet to a point; thence South 0 °30 ' 15 " West, 369. 89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , Parcel V Lots I and 52 in Block 5 , and Lot I 1 in Block 9 of Cherry Lane Village No . I Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 through 3538 , records of Ada County, Idaho. Parcel VI Lots 12 and 21 in Block 9 and Lot 4 in Block I I and Lot 53 in Block 5 of Cherry Lane Village No . 2 Subdivision , according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792 , records of Ada County , Idaho. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 10 Parcel VII Lot 83 in Block 5 and Lot 14, in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5473 through 5475 , records of Ada County, Idaho . EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Lot 83 in Block 5 of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision located in the SE '/+ of Section 3 , T. 3N . , R . I W. , B . M . , Ada County , Idaho, and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast comer of said SE %, ; thence North 00' 19 ' 11 " East 451 . 29 feet along the Easterly boundary of said SE '/. and the centerline of Ten Mile Road to a point marking the intersection of the centerline of the proposed Woodmont Drive and said centerline of Ten Mile Road ; thence along the following courses and distances along said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive ; North 89'40 '49" West 136 . 00 feet to a point of curve ; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the right 54 .87 feet, said curve having a central angle of 21 °40 ' 49", a radius of 145 . 00 feet, tangents of 27. 77 feet and a long chord of 54 . 54 feet bearing North 78050 ' 25 " West to a point of tangent; thence North 68 °00 ' 00" West 171 .40 feet to a point of curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the left 78 . 86 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25 °49 ' 14", a radius of 175 . 00 feet, tangents of 40 . 11 feet and a long chord of 78. 20 feet bearing North 80 °54 ' 37" West to a point of ending of curve; thence leaving said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive along a non- tangent line, South 05035 ' 15 " West 25 .40 feet to a point marking the Northwesterly corner of Lot 84, Block 5 of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No . 3 Subdivision, also said point being on the Southwesterly right-of--way line of said proposed Woodmont Drive, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 05 ' 35 ' 15 " West 66 . 64 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Lot 84, Block 5 to a point marking the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 84, Block 5, also said point being on the Southerly boundary of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision; thence North 60°50 '49" West 3 .00 feet along said Southerly boundary of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision to a point ; thence leaving said Southerly boundary , North 05 * 13 ' 51 " West 62 .96 feet to a point on said Southerly right-of--way line of proposed Woodmont Drive, also said point being a point on curve; thence Northeasterly along a non-tangent curve to the right along said Southerly right-of-- way line of proposed Woodmont Drive 15 .01 feet, said curve having a central angle of 05 °44 ' 02", a radius of 150. 00 feet, tangents of 7 . 51 feet and a long chord of 15 . 00 feet bearing North 81 °4336" East to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel VIII Lot 28 in Block I I and Lot 39 in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No . 4 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 63 of Plats at Pages 6376 and 6377, records of Ada County, Idaho, QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE I I Parcel IX Lot 9 in Block l of Record of Survey No. 802 of adjusted lot lines for Lots 8 , 9 and 10, in Block l of The Lake at Cherry Lane, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570, records of Ada County , Idaho. EXCEPT that portion lying within the original Lot 8 . Parcel X Lot 5 in Block 1 and Lot 13 in Block 2, The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 2, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XI Lot 24 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 70 of Plats at Pages 7167 and 7168 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XII Lot 19 in Block 1 and Lot 46 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Page 7674 and 7675 , records of Ada County, Idaho . QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 12 Mayor Robert E. Simison City Council Members: ENIDLIAN114-�- Luke railer,Caven ri President Liz Strader,Vice President Brian Whitlock H O Doug Taylor John Overton Anne Little Roberts September 24, 2024TO: Meridian City Council Mayor Robert E. Simison FROM: Steve Siddoway, Parks and Recreation Department Director Emily Kane, Deputy City Attorney RE: Transfer of WARD Assets to City of Meridian This memorandum is provided to recap the plan to transfer assets held by the Western Ada Recreation District ("WARD") to City ownership. This project has been several years in the making, and one of the final steps will be action by City Council at your September 24, 2024 meeting. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets executed by WARD and the City on April 2, 2024 (Exhibit A), WARD is conveying the following assets to the City: 1. Meridian Community Swimming Pool, located at 213 E. Franklin Road. Under a License and Maintenance Agreement, the City has been operating and maintaining the Pool on WARD's behalf since February 8, 2022. By Quitclaim Deed approved by WARD at its August 28, 2024 meeting (Exhibit B), WARD will convey fee simple ownership of the Pool to the City when the City records the Quitclaim Deed on September 30, 2024. 2. Settlers Village Neighborhood Park, located at 1031 E. Tammy Street. The City has also been maintaining the Park on WARD's behalf pursuant to the February 8, 2022 License and Maintenance Agreement. By another Quitclaim Deed approved by WARD at its August 28, 2024 meeting (Exhibit C), WARD will convey fee simple ownership of the Park to the City when the City records the Quitclaim Deed on September 30, 2024. 3. All Personal Property. Pursuant to an Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property,which will be on City Council's agenda on September 24, WARD will convey to the City all personal property at the Pool, Park, and Lakeview Golf Course (4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian) (Exhibit D). WARD approved this Agreement at its meeting on August 28, 2024. Following approval of the Agreement by City Council and execution by the Mayor, it will be effective as of closing on September 30, 2024. 4. Leasehold at Lakeview Golf Course. The City owns Lakeview Golf Course. On May 17, 2005, the City leased the Golf Course to Lakeview Meridian Investors LLC, and Boise Ranch Golf Course, Inc. On November 6, Meridian Parks & Recreation Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #206 . Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 . Fax 208-489-0482 . www.meridiancity.org 2020, the City assigned the lease to WARD. The City has been operating and maintaining the Golf Course on WARD's behalf,pursuant to a License and Management Agreement, since August 11, 2020. The lease agreement states that the leasehold interest may be extinguished by tendering a quitclaim deed to the City. WARD approved a Quitclaim Deed to this effect at its August 28, 2024 meeting (Exhibit E). The City will record the Quitclaim Deed on September 30, 2024, at which point the leasehold will be extinguished. Pursuant to the April 2, 2024 Memorandum of Agreement, WARD is entitled to consideration for these conveyances of real and personal property in the amount of$1.00. We have received an invoice from WARD for this payment. The agreed-upon closing date is September 30, 2024, and closing will be effectuated when the Clerk's Office staff records the quitclaim deeds and Finance Department staff mails the check. My staff are in the process of obtaining valuations for the properties and taking inventory of the personal property for the purposes of asset management and FY24 closeout. Idaho Code section 67-2323 requires published notice of agreements involving "conveyances or transfers of real or personal property with a value in excess of ten thousand dollars ($10,000)." Pursuant to that provision, notices that City Council proposes to ratify the conveyances from WARD at its September 24, 2024 meeting have been published in the Idaho Press on September 10 and September 17, 2024. (Notices of WARD's August 28, 2024 meeting were also published, on August 15 and 22, 2024.) The action items I will request from City Council at its September 24, 2024 meeting are: 1. Adopt a resolution acknowledging and ratifying the conveyances of the Pool and Park from WARD; 2. Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property; and 3. Adopt a resolution acknowledging WARD's termination of its lease of the Golf Course. Please contact me if you have any questions about the history of this project, or the remaining steps. You can reach me at ssiddowaykmeridiancity.org or 208-489-0556. I look forward to continuing WARD's long-standing legacy of stewardship and service to the Meridian community as the City accepts these generous gifts from WARD. Meridian Parks & Recreation Department . 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite #206 . Meridian, ID 83642 Phone 208-898-5506 . Fax 208-489-0482 . www.meridiancity.org ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024_054698 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=2 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:12 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIANGITYCLERK " 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 " QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho("Grantor"),does hereby grant,bargain, sell,--and convey unto the City" of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State-of Idaho,-whose current address is 33 E.-Broadway Avenue,Meridian, Idaho("Grantee") and its successors and assigns " forever,the following described premises,in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: See attached Exhibit I. To have-and to hold the said premises,together with all buildings, structures, in�iprovements,fixtures, and appurtenances thereto, and any and all estate,right,title,interest, appurtenances,tenements,hereditaments,reversions,remainders, easements.-rents,issues,profits, rights-of-_way and water"rights-in anywise appertaining to the real property herein described;unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever. IN WHNESS WFIEREQF',the Grantor has executed this instrument on thi day of 2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF lDAHO WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss. ISTRICT County of ) Thi record was acknowledged before me on the `day of 2024,by Shaun'Wardle,=on behalf of the" ` �-� West a ecreatio istrict"in leis capacity-as Board h Wardle;Board President Presi ent♦ Notary Public fpr Residing at �• ,Idaho ��W0•� o My Commission Expires: � y -ov y c- Qulr rCLA DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PA43E 1 EXHIBIT 1 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Ada, State of Idaho , and is described as follows : A parcel of land, as shown on the Record of Survey No . 8737 , on file under Instrument No . 110021878 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho, lying in the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 18 , T . 3N. , R. lE. , B .M. , Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows : COMMENCING at the North 1 /4 corner of said Section 18 , marked by a brass cap ; thence along the North line of said Section 18 South 89 °20 '05 " West 1309 . 06 feet to the Northeast comer of Government Lot 1 of said Northwest 1 /4 of Section 18 as shown on Record of Survey No . 2017 on file under Instrument No . 9168335 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho ; thence along the East line of said Government Lot 1 South 00 °40'03 " West 414 . 24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, marked by an iron pin ; thence continuing South 00 "40'03 " West 247 . 34 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 52° 1T11 " West 450 . 67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 00 °40 '03 " East 11 .43 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 87 ° 14 ' 16 " East 173 . 69 feet to a point of curve, marked by an iron pin ; thence along the arc of a curve to the left 55 . 71 feet, said curve having a radius of 66 . 00 feet, a central angle of 48 °21 '47 " , and a long chord bearing North 63 °03 '22 " East 54 . 07 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 38 °52 '29 " East 44 . 52 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 51 ° 07 '31 " East 19 . 67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence South 38 ° 52'29 " West 16 .49 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence South 51 °52'37 " East 133 . 04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN : S 1118223084 QurrcLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PAGE 2 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-054699 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=1 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RE ORDEVGRWLTESTEDBYANI} WHEN RECORDED RET URN T0: PMDLW CITY CLERif 33E.Broadway Avenue Meridian;=ldfaha 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized-under the laws of the State"of Idaho("Grantor"),-"does hereby grant,bargain,sell, and convey to the City of Meridian;a muiucipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue;Meridian;Idaho("Grantee"),and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises;in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: "Lot 14 in Block 2 of SETTLERS VILLAGE, a re-plat of the original Settlers Plat as vacated by the City of Meridian in April, according to the plat thereof,filled in-Book 51 of Plats at Pages 4206 through 4209;and Amended by an Affidavit recorded August"3, 1984 as:Instrument No. 8438997 and Affidavit recorded December 18,2007 as Instrument No. 107166403 -Records of Ada County,-Idaho.-. To have and to:hold the said premises;together with all buildings,structures,improvements, fixtures,and appurtenances thereto,and any and all estate,right,title,interest,appurtenances;tenements, hereditaments,reversions,remainders,easements,rents,issues,profits,rights-of-way acid water,rights-in anywise appertaining to:the reel property herein described,unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever: , WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thi _ ay of 2024. GRA NTOR: :. STATE OF IDAHO � WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT ) ss:- County of ) Th4reco_ rd was acknowledged beftare me on the day of2024,by Shaun Wardle,:on behalf of the----- istrict, his capacity as Board Shaun Wardle,Board President Presiders Notary Public r I llo Residing at Idaho �.�. z - .� My Commission xpires: 7LBee- OmcT.I�ilvi DEED FOR TRANSFER oFTA MY STREET PARK PAGE 1 AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY This AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY ("Agreement") is made this _ day of , 2024 ("Effective Date") , by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City") , and the Western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("WARD") (collectively, "Parties") . WHEREAS , WARD is the owner of personal property ("Personal Property") used for the operation and maintenance of the Community Swimming Pool, located at 213 E. Franklin Road, in Meridian ("Pool") , a neighborhood park located at 1031 E. Tammy Street, in Meridian ("Park") , and Lakeview Golf Course, located at 4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian ("Golf Course") ; and, WHEREAS , pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets entered into by the Parties ("MOA") , by this Agreement WARD seeks to convey the Personal Property to City ; and WHEREAS , by this Agreement City gratefully accepts the Personal Property and agrees to use the same for the benefit of the Meridian community; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows : I. WARD ' s CONVEYANCE. A. Convey Personal Property. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, WARD hereby conveys to City, free of charge, any and all Personal Property used for the operation and maintenance of the Pool, Park, and Golf Course . B . Certifications. WARD hereby certifies that : 1 . WARD is not required to obtain the approval or consent of any person, firm, or other entity to permit WARD to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 2. WARD owns and possesses all rights , title, and interest in and to the Personal Property, free and clear of all covenants , conditions , easements, liens , and encumbrances . 3 . There is no equitable, legal, or administrative suit, action, arbitration, or other proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting WARD or the Personal Property. H. CITY ' s ACCEPTANCE. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, City shall accept and own, without payment, WARD ' s conveyance of the Personal Property, pursuant to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, and shall take ownership and possession of the Personal Property upon Closing . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 1 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Notice. All other notices required to be given by either of the Parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, addressed as follows : If to City : If to WARD . City Clerk Shaun Wardle, Board President City of Meridian Western Ada Recreation District 33 E . Broadway Avenue P . O . Box 566 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83680 B . Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon the Effective Date and shall expire upon Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, unless earlier extended or terminated as set forth herein . C. Assignment. Neither party shall assign or sublet all or any portion of its respective interest in this Agreement or any privilege or right hereunder, either voluntarily or involuntarily, without the prior written consent of the other party. This Agreement and each and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations , legal representative, successors , and assigns of the Parties . D. No agency. For purposes of or in furtherance of this Agreement, neither party nor its respective employees , agents , contractors, officials , officers , servants , guests , and/or invitees shall be considered agents of the other in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever. E. Liability. Each party shall be solely liable for the actions and/or inactions , including errors , omissions, and/or negligence of its own employees . Neither party shall bear any responsibility or liability for the errors , omissions , and/or negligence of the other. F. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, City and WARD shall comply with all applicable laws , ordinances , and codes of Federal, State, and local governments . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3 , of the Idaho Constitution . G. Termination. 1 . Grounds. Grounds for termination of this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to : non-appropriation of funds necessary to meet either party' s obligations under this Agreement ; an act or omission by either party which materially breaches any term of this Agreement; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance of the terms of this Agreement by either party ; or a change in or occurrence of circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 2 2 . Process. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) days ' notice of intention to terminate. Such notice shall include a description of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination . A fourteen ( 14) day cure period shall commence upon provision of the notice of intention to terminate . If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this Agreement may be terminated upon mailing of notice of termination . H. Construction and severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. I. Time of the essence. The Parties acknowledge obligations under this Agreement shall be fulfilled in a timely manner. The Parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. J. Third-party beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it in any way be interpreted or construed to create, any third-party beneficiary rights in any person or entity not a party hereto . K. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts , each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. L. No limitation. Nothing in this Agreement or any other agreement shall prevent or limit City, when City owns the Personal Property, from alienating or making any improvements or changes to the Personal Property or any component thereof, whether temporarily or permanently, as may be deemed by City to further the public interest, health, safety, and/or welfare. M. Authority. The Parties certify that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement has been duly approved in accordance with applicable laws and any documents or instruments governing the respective Parties , and that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement will not, with the passage of time, the giving of notice, or otherwise, cause either Party to be in violation or breach of any law, regulation, contract, agreement, or other restriction to or by which the Party or the personal property conveyed by this Agreement are subject or bound . N. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and WARD . The Parties signatory hereto represent and warrant that each is duly authorized to bind, respectively, City and WARD to this Agreement in all respects . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT : ShauffWardle, Board President CITY OF MERIDIAN ; Robert E . Simison, Mayor Attest , Chris Johnson, City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 4 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-054700 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=12 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RECORDING REQUESTED BYANI? WHEN RECORDED RETURNTQ: MERIDIAN CITY CLERK 33 E.Broadway Avenue MeAllan,Idaho$3642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the-laws of the-State-of Idaho -'Grantor") does hereby convey,release,remise and forever quitclaim unto"the City of Meridian., a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho,whose current address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue, Meridian-,Idaho("Grantee") anal its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises, in Ada County;Idaho; to unit: See attached Exhibit 1: Lakeview Golf Course -And including,but not limited to, Grantor's leasehold interest in said premises, if any = ' (collectively,"Property"). To have and to hold the said Property, unto the said Grantee-,and , +Grantee's heirs and assigns,forever. IN WITNE S EREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on this ay of 2024 NTOR: .. STATE OF IDAHO ) WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss: DISTRICT County of Thi record was acknowledged before me on the y _. of 2024 b Shaun Wardle,on behalf of the �� Weste a Recreation D' ict,in his capacity as Board ha n Wardle;:Board President President. Notary Public for o Residing at Idaho My Commission Expires: .� �'• ADZ � s QUffCLAIM DEED-LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEviEw GOLF COURSE . . ,PAGE l ; EXIIIIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY Parcel I A parcel of land being a portion of the West half Section 3 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows ; Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County Idaho ; thence along the Southerly boundary of said Northeast Quarter of Section 3 North 88055129" West 2643 .29 feet to a brass cap marking the Southwest comer of the Northeast Quarter; thence leaving said Southerly boundary North 75 °30 ' 00" West 190 .00 feet to a 2 " iron pipe ; thence North 400001001 , West 40 . 06 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 75 °59 ' 31 " West 70 . 00 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 25000 ' 00" West 64. 19 feet to an iron pin ; thence North 89°25 ' 06" West 254 . 51 feet to a point, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING, thence continuing North 89°25 ' 06" West 100.01 feet to a point ; thence South 00'30 ' 11 " West 407. 92 feet to a point ; thence South 68054 ' 11 " East 276.46 feet to a point marking a point of curve ; thence along a curve to the right 59.46 feet, said curve having a central angle of 34°04 ' 10", a radius of 100 . 00 feet, tangents of 30.64 feet and a long chord of 58 . 59 feet bearing South 51 °52 ' 06" East to a point marking a point of tangents; thence South 34050 ' 01 " East 292. 99 feet to a point ; thence South 89°48 '41 " East 147 .34 feet to a point ; thence North 35 °00 ' 00" West 109 . 03 feet to a point; thence North 51 °45 ' 00" West 580.00 feet to a point; thence North 00129 '44 " East 335 . 18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel II A parcel of land lying in portions of the South half of the North half and the North half of the South half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point marking the Northwest comer of the said North half of the South half of Section 3 ; thence South 89°25 ' 06" East 2 ,077 .73 feet along the Northerly boundary of the said North half of the South half of Section 3 to a point also said point being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence South 0°29 '44" West 335 . 18 feet to a point ; thence South 51 °45 ' 00" East 580 . 00 feet to a point; thence South 35°00 '00" East 285 . 33 feet to a point; thence South 22 ° 15 ' 00" West 60.05 feet to a point ; thence QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 2 South 4305810" East 238 . 75 feet to a point; thence South 29000 ' 00" East 110.00 feet to a point, thence North 61 000 ' 00" East 81 . 19 feet to a point of curves thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 147. 14 feet , said curve having a central angle of 48010 '28", a radius of 175 . 00 feet, tangents of 78 . 23 feet and a long chord of 142. 84 feet bearing North 36054 '46" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 56030 '00" West 151 . 38 feet to a point; thence North 41 °30 '00" West 203 .92 feet to a point , thence North 17* 15 '00" West 94 . 14 feet to a point; thence North 22° 15 '00" East 147.00 feet to a point; thence North 65050 '00" East 45 .00 feet to a point; thence South 87 °20 '00" East 78 .40 feet to a point; thence South 68°00 '00" East 61 .48 feet to a point ; thence South 71033 '25 " East 88.05 feet to a point ; thence South 60°00 ' 00" East 108 .33 feet to a point of beginning of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the right 139. 32 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25035 ' l 9", a radius of 311 .95 feet, tangents of 70. 84 feet and along chord of 138 . 16 feet bearing North 56° 12 ' 20" East to a point of tangent, thence North 69100 ' 00" East 115 .08 feet to a point of curve; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left 125 . 75 feet, said curve having a central angle of 24°25 ' 22", a radius of 295 .00 feet, tangents of 63 . 84 feet and a long chord of 124.80 feet bearing North 56'47 ' 19" East to a point of ending of curve; thence North 44000 '00" West 79.63 feet to a point; thence North 67°45 ' 00" West 160. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 65°50 ' 00" West 244 .67 feet to a point; thence North 50°30 '00" West 114 . 35 feet to a point ; thence North 44°00 '00" East 90.00 feet to a point; thence North 17 °00 ' 00" West 175 . 00 feet to a point; thence North 12°00 '00" East 280. 00 feet to a point; thence North 77°30 ' 00" West 170.00 feet to a point ; thence South 68°00' 00" West 265 .00 feet to a point marking the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of the said Section 3 ; thence North 75 °30 ' 00" West 190.00 feet to a point ; thence North 40100 ' 00" West 40 .00 feet to a point; thence South 75 °59 ' 31 " West 70.00 feet to a point; thence South 25 °00 ' 00" West 64 . 19 feet to a point on the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3 ; thence North 89025106" West 254 . 51 feet along the said Northerly boundary of the North half of the South half of Section 3 to the POINT OF BEGINNING . EXCEPT that portion lying within the following subdivisions : Cherry Lane Village No. 1 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 and 3538 , records of Ada County, Idaho; Cherry Lane Village No . 2 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792, records of Ada County, Idaho, The Lake at Cherry Lane, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570 , records of Ada County, Idaho , The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 2, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883 , records of Ada County , Idaho ; QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 3 The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , records of Ada County , Idaho . Parcel III-A A portion of the West half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4 , 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0°3 8 ' 11 " East 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County ,tdaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East 2697 . 49 feet ; thence North 0°38 '27" East 22 .64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin ; thence South 88 °5531 " East 379.53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence continuing South 88 °55 ' 31 " East 182. 65 feet to a point ; thence South 8 ° 18 ' 10" East 440. 66 feet to a point; thence South 16° 18 ' 25 " West 218 .04 feet to a point; thence North 89° 13 ' 51 " East 540. 22 feet to a point; thence North 71 °43 ' 34" East 442 .46 feet to a point , thence North 10°33 ' 50" East 487 . 84 feet to a point, thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East 124 . 84 feet to a point; thence South 500381251, East 89.99 feet to a point ; thence 165 . 33 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 250.25 feet, a central angle of 37°51 ' 08", and a long chord bearing South 31 °42 ' 52" East 162 .34 feet to a point ; thence North 89°29 ' 44" West 120 . 24 feet to a point ; thence South 4027 ' l 7" East 80 . 30 feet to a point; thence South 0°30 ' 16" West 230. 52 feet to a points thence South 10131 ' 20" West 123 .51 feet to a point; thence South 301 14 ' 07" West 119.57 feet to a point; thence South 50050 ' 29" West 134 . 39 feet to a point; thence South 71 °2848 " West 120 .64 feet to a point ; thence South 82°45 ' 52" West 225 . 84 feet to a point; thence South 89°02 ' 57" West 67 .30 feet to a points thence North 89° 10 ' 41 West 825 . 06 feet to a point; thence North 77°29 ' 20" West 148 .07 feet to a point, thence North 89 ° 10 ' 41 " West 160.40 feet to a point lying 65 . 00 feet East of the West boundary of said Section 3 , thence along a line 65 .00 feet East of and parallel to the West boundary of said Section 3 North 0°38 ' 11 East 247 .64 feet to a point, thence South 89°21 ' 49" East 156. 03 feet to a point; thence North 45°03 ' 16" East 163 . 61 feet to a point; thence North 5 °39 '31 " East 502.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 4 Parcel III-B A portion of the West half of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0'38 ' 11 " East 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °3827" East 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0138 ' 27" East 22 .64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°56 ' 31 " East 1977 . 72 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence South 0°30 ' 15 " West 413 . 59 feet to a point; thence North 68 *54 ' 11 " West 26. 71 feet to a point; thence North 0*30 ' l 5 " East 217 . 93 feet to a point , thence 211 . 88 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 249 .75 feet, a central angle of 48°3625 " and a long chord bearing North 23 °47 ' 57" West 205 . 58 feet to a point ; thence South 88 °5531 " East 109.62 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Parcel IV-A A portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West ; Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °3827" East 22.64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 379 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 5 °3931 " East, 290 , 28 feet to a point; thence 46. 45 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 250 .00 feet, a central angle of 10*38 ' 46" , and a long chord bearing South 49122 ' 43 " East, 46.39 feet to a point; thence South 44°03 ' 20" East, 136 . 41 feet to a point; thence South 8 * 18 ' 10" East, 165 . 80 feet to a point ; thence North 8805531 " West, 182 . 65 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel IV-B A portion of Government Lot 4 and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho more particularly described as follows : QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 5 Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 91 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Section 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 °38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet ; thence North 0°38 '27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8 " iron pin; thence South 88 °55 ' 31 " East, 834. 71 feet to a point ; thence North 1104 '29" East, 77.45 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence 199 .31 feet along the are of curve to the right having a radius of 270.00 feet , a central angle of 42117 '41 and a long chord bearing North 65112 ' 11 " West, 194. 81 feet to a point; thence North 44°03 '20" West, 198 .06 feet to a point; thence North 37°38 ' 05 " East, 125 . 90 feet to a point; thence North 4 °26' 20" West, 178 .94 feet to a point; thence North 49° 13 '43 " West, 619. 18 feet to a point; thence North 89°21 ' 33 " West, 39 .72 feet to a point; thence North 013827" East, 178 ,61 feet to a point; thence South 89°21 ' 33 " East, 104 .94 feet to a point; thence North 26°46 ' 55" East, 463 . 73 feet to a point; thence North 13 °05 ' 08 " East, 186. 18 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 221 . 37 feet to a point; thence South 0 °3656" West, 30.00 feet to a point; thence North 89°23 ' 04" West, 114.43 feet to a point; thence South 10*38 ' 11 " West, 162 .48 feet to a point; thence South 5136 ' 09" East, 160.95 feet to a point; thence South 48°58 ' 55 " West, 66.41 feet to a point; thence South 10°49 ' 04" West, 123 .62 feet to a point; thence South 12°00 ' 00" East, 85.00 feet to a point; thence South 53 °26 '21 " East, 142 .60 feet to a point; thence South 6°51 ' 51 " West , 151 .05 feet to a point; thence South 41 ° 14 ' 14" East, 171 . 06 feet to a point; thence South 89° 12 '26" East, 122 .33 feet to a point ; thence South 43°03 ' 05 " East, 60. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 0°36 ' 15" West, 671 . 50 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, Parcel IV -C A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4 , 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0*38 ' 11 " East, 2651 , 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 ( CP & F Instrument No. 7852146 , records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0°38 ' 27" East, 2697 .49 feet; thence North 0 °38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8 ' iron pin; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1784 . 61 feet to a point; thence North 1 °04 ' 29" East, 303 . 15 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 66128 '40" West, 157 . 70 feet to a point ; thence QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 6 North 56056 ' 39" West, 717.37 feet to a point ; thence North 89023 ' 44" West, 36. 12 feet to a point ; thence North 0°36 '28 " East, 5 . 00 feet to a point; thence 154. 59 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 225 .00 feet, a central angle of 39°22 ' 00", and a long chord bearing North 19 °04 ' 45 " West, 151 . 57 feet to a point; thence North 38°45 ' 45 " West, 39 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 51 ° 14 ' 15 " East, 110 . 00 feet to a point; thence North 26° 11 ' 31 " West, 134. 78 feet to a point ; thence North 4004120" West, 277 .45 feet to a point; thence North 31 °46 ' 35 " West, 241 .56 feet to a point; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 132.59 feet to a point; thence North 89123 '04" West, 110 . 00 feet to a point ; thence North 0036 ' 56" East, 30. 00 feet to a point; thence South 89°23 ' 04" East, 175 .94 feet to a point; thence South 78005 '29" East, 71 . 13 feet to a point; thence South 63013 ' 16 " East, 65 . 34 feet to a point; thence South 56°28 ' 32" East, 79 . 07 feet to a point ; thence South 53015 ' 09 " East, 86 . 07 feet to a point, thence South 42 *31 ' 18" East, 70.53 feet to a point; thence South 35 °28 ' 22" East, 7T08 feet to a point ; thence South 5049 ' 06" East, 249 . 89 feet to a point; thence South 8 ° 16 '07" East, 125 .42 feet to a point; thence South 13 °56 ' 20" East, 266.06 feet to a point; thence South 42143 ' 29" East, 283 .07 feet to a point; thence North 61 °49 ' 13" East, 165 .37 feet to a point; thence North 11100 ' 42" West, 399. 24 feet to a point ; thence South 89018 ' 49" East, 398 .40 feet to a point; thence South 79°02 ' 15 " East, 61 . 16 feet to a point ; thence South 60*40 ' 15 " East, 164.39 feet to a point; thence South 85° 10 ' 18 " East, 136.30 feet to a point; thence South 0'30 ' 15 " West, 235 .93 feet to a point; thence North 89129 '45 " West, 80. 00 feet to a point ; thence South 78033 '49" West, 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence South 11 °45 ' 15 " West, 185 . 77 feet to a point ; thence South 0°30 ' 15" West, 154. 10 feet to a point, thence 288 . 86 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 38 °56 ' 31 and a long chord bearing South 63004 ' 11 " West, 283 .33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , EXCEPTING THEREFROM ; A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast comer of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Ada County, Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3 , South 00°27 ' 29" West 1 , 365 .57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast comer of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEwGOLF COURSE PAGE 7 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, North 89° 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest comer of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision; thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486 . 13 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence continuing along said Westerly boundary, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 19. 38 feet to a point; thence leaving said Northwesterly boundary, North 89°29 '45 " West 79.95 feet to a point; thence South 78 °33 ' 49 ' West 182 . 71 feet to a point ; thence North 11 °45 '06 " East 20. 62 feet to a point; thence North 78 °53 ' 05" East 183 .47 feet to a point; thence South 89°29 ' 54" East 74. 99 feet to the Point of Beginning. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM . A portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 3 North, Range I West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County , Idaho and more particularly described as follows ; Beginning at a brass cap marking the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West , Boise Meridian, Meridian Ada County , Idaho ; thence along the Easterly boundary of the said Northwest quarter of Section 3, South 00°27 '2 . 9" West 1 ,365. 57 feet to an iron pin marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 , said iron pin also being on the Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision as filed for record in the office of the Ada County Recorder, Boise, Idaho, in Book 74 of Plats at Pages 7674 and 7675 , thence leaving said Easterly boundary and along the said Northerly boundary of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, North 89* 18 ' 58 " West 301 . 76 feet to an iron pin marking the Northwest corner of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 subdivision, thence leaving said Northerly boundary and along the Westerly boundary of said The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 4 Subdivision, South 00°30 ' 18 " West 486. 13 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving said Westerly boundary North 89°29 ' 54" West 74 . 97 feet to an iron pin; thence South 78 °53 ' 05 " West 183 .47 feet to an iron pin, said iron pin being the Real Point of Beginning, thence South 11 °45 ' 06" West 206. 39 feet to an iron pin ; thence South 00°30 ' 06" West 154. 08 feet to an iron pin, thence Southwesterly 24. 54 feet along the arc of a curve to the left said curve having a radius of 425 . 00 feet, a central angle of 03118 '29", and a long chord bearing South 80°53 '03 " West 24. 54 feet, to a point on the Easterly right of way of the Eight Mile Lateral ; thence along said Easterly right of way North 00°42 ' 19" East 347 .61 feet to a point ; thence leaving said Easterly said right of way North 78153 ' 05" East 64.54 feet to the Real Point of Beginning. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER,INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 8 Parcel IV -D A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North , Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the comer common to Sections 4, 9 , 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 098 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter comer common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No. 7852146, records of Ada County , Idaho); from which the Northwest comer of said Section 3 bears North 0138 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet; thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22. 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88°55 ' 31 " East, 1614 . 53 feet to the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 10'33 '50" East, 72 . 37 feet to a point; thence 129 . 52 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the right, having a radius of 600. 00 feet, a central angle of 12 °22 '07", and a long chord bearing South 56°49 ' 29" East, 129.27 feet to a point; thence South 50°3825" East, 4 . 33 feet to a point; thence North 88 °5531 " West, 124 . 84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 9 Parcel IV -E A portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 , Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows. Commencing at the corner common to Sections 4 , 9, 10 and the said Section 3 ; thence North 0 *38 ' 11 " East, 2651 . 19 feet to the quarter corner common to said Sections 3 and 4 as same was reestablished by LS 972 (CP & F Instrument No . 7852146, records of Ada County, Idaho); from which the Northwest corner of said Section 3 bears North 0 *38 ' 27" East, 2697.49 feet, thence North 0°38 ' 27" East 22 . 64 feet to a 5/8" iron pin ; thence South 88 °55 '31 " East, 1977.72 feet to a 5/8" iron pin and the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence North 88 °55 ' 31 " West 109. 62 feet to a point; thence 11 . 06 feet along the arc of a nontangent curve to the left, having a radius of 249. 75 feet, a central angle of 2132 ' 16 ", and a long chord hearing North 49°22 ' 17" West , 11 .06 feet to a point, thence North 50°38 ' 25 " West, 94 .32 feet to a point ; thence 60 .45 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 680. 00 feet, a central angle of 5 °05 '36", and a long chord bearing North 53 ° 11 ' l3 " West, 60.43 feet to a point; thence 30. 13 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, a central angle of 86° 18 ' 50", and a long chord bearing North 12°34 ' 36" West, 27 . 36 feet to a point ; thence North 30°34 ' 50" East, 84 . 13 feet to a point; thence 269 . 77 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 375 , 00 feel, a central angle of 41 * 13 ' 04", and a long chord bearing North 51 ° 11 '21 " East , 263 .99 feet to a point; thence South 0 °30 ' 15 " West, 369. 89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING , Parcel V Lots I and 52 in Block 5 , and Lot I 1 in Block 9 of Cherry Lane Village No . I Subdivision, according to the plat thereof filed in Book 44 of Plats at Pages 3537 through 3538 , records of Ada County, Idaho. Parcel VI Lots 12 and 21 in Block 9 and Lot 4 in Block I I and Lot 53 in Block 5 of Cherry Lane Village No . 2 Subdivision , according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 46 of Plats at Pages 3791 and 3792 , records of Ada County , Idaho. QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE PAGE 10 Parcel VII Lot 83 in Block 5 and Lot 14, in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 58 of Plats at Pages 5473 through 5475 , records of Ada County, Idaho . EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Lot 83 in Block 5 of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision located in the SE '/+ of Section 3 , T. 3N . , R . I W. , B . M . , Ada County , Idaho, and more particularly described as follows : Beginning at a brass cap marking the Southeast comer of said SE %, ; thence North 00' 19 ' 11 " East 451 . 29 feet along the Easterly boundary of said SE '/. and the centerline of Ten Mile Road to a point marking the intersection of the centerline of the proposed Woodmont Drive and said centerline of Ten Mile Road ; thence along the following courses and distances along said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive ; North 89'40 '49" West 136 . 00 feet to a point of curve ; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the right 54 .87 feet, said curve having a central angle of 21 °40 ' 49", a radius of 145 . 00 feet, tangents of 27. 77 feet and a long chord of 54 . 54 feet bearing North 78050 ' 25 " West to a point of tangent; thence North 68 °00 ' 00" West 171 .40 feet to a point of curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve to the left 78 . 86 feet, said curve having a central angle of 25 °49 ' 14", a radius of 175 . 00 feet, tangents of 40 . 11 feet and a long chord of 78. 20 feet bearing North 80 °54 ' 37" West to a point of ending of curve; thence leaving said proposed centerline of Woodmont Drive along a non- tangent line, South 05035 ' 15 " West 25 .40 feet to a point marking the Northwesterly corner of Lot 84, Block 5 of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No . 3 Subdivision, also said point being on the Southwesterly right-of--way line of said proposed Woodmont Drive, said point also being the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 05 ' 35 ' 15 " West 66 . 64 feet along the Westerly boundary of said Lot 84, Block 5 to a point marking the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 84, Block 5, also said point being on the Southerly boundary of said proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision; thence North 60°50 '49" West 3 .00 feet along said Southerly boundary of the proposed Cherry Lane Village No. 3 Subdivision to a point ; thence leaving said Southerly boundary , North 05 * 13 ' 51 " West 62 .96 feet to a point on said Southerly right-of--way line of proposed Woodmont Drive, also said point being a point on curve; thence Northeasterly along a non-tangent curve to the right along said Southerly right-of-- way line of proposed Woodmont Drive 15 .01 feet, said curve having a central angle of 05 °44 ' 02", a radius of 150. 00 feet, tangents of 7 . 51 feet and a long chord of 15 . 00 feet bearing North 81 °4336" East to the POINT OF BEGINNING . Parcel VIII Lot 28 in Block I I and Lot 39 in Block 13 Cherry Lane Village No . 4 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 63 of Plats at Pages 6376 and 6377, records of Ada County, Idaho, QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE I I Parcel IX Lot 9 in Block l of Record of Survey No. 802 of adjusted lot lines for Lots 8 , 9 and 10, in Block l of The Lake at Cherry Lane, according to the plat thereof, filed in Book 52 of Plats at Pages 4569 and 4570, records of Ada County , Idaho. EXCEPT that portion lying within the original Lot 8 . Parcel X Lot 5 in Block 1 and Lot 13 in Block 2, The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 2, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 54 of Plats at Pages 4882 and 4883 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XI Lot 24 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No . 3 Subdivision according to the official plat thereof filed in Book 70 of Plats at Pages 7167 and 7168 , records of Ada County, Idaho . Parcel XII Lot 19 in Block 1 and Lot 46 in Block 2 of The Lake at Cherry Lane No. 4 Subdivision, according to the official plat thereof, filed in Book 74 of Plats at Page 7674 and 7675 , records of Ada County, Idaho . QUITCLAIM DEED - LEASEHOLD AND ANY OTHER INTEREST IN LAKEVIEw GOLF COURSE PAGE 12 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024_054698 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=2 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:12 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RECORDING REQUESTED BYAND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: MERIDIANGITYCLERK " 33 E.Broadway Avenue Meridian,Idaho 83642 " QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho("Grantor"),does hereby grant,bargain, sell,--and convey unto the City" of Meridian,a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State-of Idaho,-whose current address is 33 E.-Broadway Avenue,Meridian, Idaho("Grantee") and its successors and assigns " forever,the following described premises,in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: See attached Exhibit I. To have-and to hold the said premises,together with all buildings, structures, in�iprovements,fixtures, and appurtenances thereto, and any and all estate,right,title,interest, appurtenances,tenements,hereditaments,reversions,remainders, easements.-rents,issues,profits, rights-of-_way and water"rights-in anywise appertaining to the real property herein described;unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever. IN WHNESS WFIEREQF',the Grantor has executed this instrument on thi day of 2024. GRANTOR: STATE OF lDAHO WESTERN ADA RECREATION ) ss. ISTRICT County of ) Thi record was acknowledged before me on the `day of 2024,by Shaun'Wardle,=on behalf of the" ` �-� West a ecreatio istrict"in leis capacity-as Board h Wardle;Board President Presi ent♦ Notary Public fpr Residing at �• ,Idaho ��W0•� o My Commission Expires: � y -ov y c- Qulr rCLA DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PA43E 1 EXHIBIT 1 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Ada, State of Idaho , and is described as follows : A parcel of land, as shown on the Record of Survey No . 8737 , on file under Instrument No . 110021878 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho, lying in the Northwest 1 /4 of Section 18 , T . 3N. , R. lE. , B .M. , Meridian, Ada County, Idaho, and more particularly described as follows : COMMENCING at the North 1 /4 corner of said Section 18 , marked by a brass cap ; thence along the North line of said Section 18 South 89 °20 '05 " West 1309 . 06 feet to the Northeast comer of Government Lot 1 of said Northwest 1 /4 of Section 18 as shown on Record of Survey No . 2017 on file under Instrument No . 9168335 in the Office of the Recorder for Ada County, Idaho ; thence along the East line of said Government Lot 1 South 00 °40'03 " West 414 . 24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, marked by an iron pin ; thence continuing South 00 "40'03 " West 247 . 34 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 52° 1T11 " West 450 . 67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 00 °40 '03 " East 11 .43 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 87 ° 14 ' 16 " East 173 . 69 feet to a point of curve, marked by an iron pin ; thence along the arc of a curve to the left 55 . 71 feet, said curve having a radius of 66 . 00 feet, a central angle of 48 °21 '47 " , and a long chord bearing North 63 °03 '22 " East 54 . 07 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence North 38 °52 '29 " East 44 . 52 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin; thence South 51 ° 07 '31 " East 19 . 67 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence South 38 ° 52'29 " West 16 .49 feet to a point, marked by an iron pin ; thence South 51 °52'37 " East 133 . 04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. APN : S 1118223084 QurrcLAIM DEED FOR TRANSFER OF MERIDIAN COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL PAGE 2 ADA COUNTY RECORDER Trent Tripple 2024-054699 BOISE IDAHO Pgs=1 ANGIE STEELE 09/30/2024 03:13 PM CITY OF MERIDIAN, IDAHO NO FEE RE ORDEVGRWLTESTEDBYANI} WHEN RECORDED RET URN T0: PMDLW CITY CLERif 33E.Broadway Avenue Meridian;=ldfaha 83642 QUITCLAIM DEED For value received,the Western Ada Recreation District,a recreation district organized-under the laws of the State"of Idaho("Grantor"),-"does hereby grant,bargain,sell, and convey to the City of Meridian;a muiucipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho whose address is 33 E. Broadway Avenue;Meridian;Idaho("Grantee"),and its successors and assigns forever,the following described premises;in Ada County,Idaho,to wit: "Lot 14 in Block 2 of SETTLERS VILLAGE, a re-plat of the original Settlers Plat as vacated by the City of Meridian in April, according to the plat thereof,filled in-Book 51 of Plats at Pages 4206 through 4209;and Amended by an Affidavit recorded August"3, 1984 as:Instrument No. 8438997 and Affidavit recorded December 18,2007 as Instrument No. 107166403 -Records of Ada County,-Idaho.-. To have and to:hold the said premises;together with all buildings,structures,improvements, fixtures,and appurtenances thereto,and any and all estate,right,title,interest,appurtenances;tenements, hereditaments,reversions,remainders,easements,rents,issues,profits,rights-of-way acid water,rights-in anywise appertaining to:the reel property herein described,unto the said Grantee,its heirs and assigns forever: , WITNESS WHEREOF,the Grantor has executed this instrument on thi _ ay of 2024. GRA NTOR: :. STATE OF IDAHO � WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT ) ss:- County of ) Th4reco_ rd was acknowledged beftare me on the day of2024,by Shaun Wardle,:on behalf of the----- istrict, his capacity as Board Shaun Wardle,Board President Presiders Notary Public r I llo Residing at Idaho �.�. z - .� My Commission xpires: 7LBee- OmcT.I�ilvi DEED FOR TRANSFER oFTA MY STREET PARK PAGE 1 E IDIAN 'aAHO AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Agreement for Transfer of Personal Property from Western Ada Recreation District to the City of Meridian AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY This AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF PERSONAL PROPERTY ("Agreement") is made this _ day of , 2024 ("Effective Date") , by and between the City of Meridian, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("City") , and the Western Ada Recreation District, a recreation district organized under the laws of the State of Idaho ("WARD") (collectively, "Parties") . WHEREAS , WARD is the owner of personal property ("Personal Property") used for the operation and maintenance of the Community Swimming Pool, located at 213 E. Franklin Road, in Meridian ("Pool") , a neighborhood park located at 1031 E. Tammy Street, in Meridian ("Park") , and Lakeview Golf Course, located at 4200 W. Talamore Boulevard, in Meridian ("Golf Course") ; and, WHEREAS , pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement between Western Ada Recreation District and City of Meridian for Transfer of Assets entered into by the Parties ("MOA") , by this Agreement WARD seeks to convey the Personal Property to City ; and WHEREAS , by this Agreement City gratefully accepts the Personal Property and agrees to use the same for the benefit of the Meridian community; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and agreed, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the Parties agree as follows : I. WARD ' s CONVEYANCE. A. Convey Personal Property. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, WARD hereby conveys to City, free of charge, any and all Personal Property used for the operation and maintenance of the Pool, Park, and Golf Course . B . Certifications. WARD hereby certifies that : 1 . WARD is not required to obtain the approval or consent of any person, firm, or other entity to permit WARD to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 2. WARD owns and possesses all rights , title, and interest in and to the Personal Property, free and clear of all covenants , conditions , easements, liens , and encumbrances . 3 . There is no equitable, legal, or administrative suit, action, arbitration, or other proceeding pending or threatened against or affecting WARD or the Personal Property. H. CITY ' s ACCEPTANCE. As of Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, City shall accept and own, without payment, WARD ' s conveyance of the Personal Property, pursuant to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, and shall take ownership and possession of the Personal Property upon Closing . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 1 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Notice. All other notices required to be given by either of the Parties hereto shall be in writing and be deemed communicated when personally served, or mailed in the United States mail, addressed as follows : If to City : If to WARD . City Clerk Shaun Wardle, Board President City of Meridian Western Ada Recreation District 33 E . Broadway Avenue P . O . Box 566 Meridian, Idaho 83642 Meridian, Idaho 83680 B . Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon the Effective Date and shall expire upon Closing, as such term is defined in the MOA, unless earlier extended or terminated as set forth herein . C. Assignment. Neither party shall assign or sublet all or any portion of its respective interest in this Agreement or any privilege or right hereunder, either voluntarily or involuntarily, without the prior written consent of the other party. This Agreement and each and all of the terms and conditions hereof shall apply to and are binding upon the respective organizations , legal representative, successors , and assigns of the Parties . D. No agency. For purposes of or in furtherance of this Agreement, neither party nor its respective employees , agents , contractors, officials , officers , servants , guests , and/or invitees shall be considered agents of the other in any manner or for any purpose whatsoever. E. Liability. Each party shall be solely liable for the actions and/or inactions , including errors , omissions, and/or negligence of its own employees . Neither party shall bear any responsibility or liability for the errors , omissions , and/or negligence of the other. F. Compliance with laws. In performing the scope of services required hereunder, City and WARD shall comply with all applicable laws , ordinances , and codes of Federal, State, and local governments . This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the statutes and constitution of the State of Idaho, including, without limitation, Article VIII, Section 3 , of the Idaho Constitution . G. Termination. 1 . Grounds. Grounds for termination of this Agreement shall include, but shall not be limited to : non-appropriation of funds necessary to meet either party' s obligations under this Agreement ; an act or omission by either party which materially breaches any term of this Agreement; an act of nature or other unforeseeable event which precludes or makes impossible the performance of the terms of this Agreement by either party ; or a change in or occurrence of circumstances that renders the performance by either party a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 2 2 . Process. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) days ' notice of intention to terminate. Such notice shall include a description of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination . A fourteen ( 14) day cure period shall commence upon provision of the notice of intention to terminate . If, upon the expiration of such cure period, cure of the breach or circumstances providing grounds for termination has not occurred, this Agreement may be terminated upon mailing of notice of termination . H. Construction and severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, such holding will not affect the validity or enforceability of any other part of this Agreement so long as the remainder of the Agreement is reasonably capable of completion. I. Time of the essence. The Parties acknowledge obligations under this Agreement shall be fulfilled in a timely manner. The Parties acknowledge and agree that time is strictly of the essence with respect to this Agreement, and that the failure to timely perform any of the obligations hereunder shall constitute a breach of, and a default under, this Agreement by the party so failing to perform. J. Third-party beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it in any way be interpreted or construed to create, any third-party beneficiary rights in any person or entity not a party hereto . K. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts , each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. L. No limitation. Nothing in this Agreement or any other agreement shall prevent or limit City, when City owns the Personal Property, from alienating or making any improvements or changes to the Personal Property or any component thereof, whether temporarily or permanently, as may be deemed by City to further the public interest, health, safety, and/or welfare. M. Authority. The Parties certify that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement has been duly approved in accordance with applicable laws and any documents or instruments governing the respective Parties , and that the execution, delivery, and consummation of this Agreement will not, with the passage of time, the giving of notice, or otherwise, cause either Party to be in violation or breach of any law, regulation, contract, agreement, or other restriction to or by which the Party or the personal property conveyed by this Agreement are subject or bound . N. Approval required. This Agreement shall not become effective or binding until approved by the respective governing bodies of both City and WARD . The Parties signatory hereto represent and warrant that each is duly authorized to bind, respectively, City and WARD to this Agreement in all respects . AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties shall cause this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the day and year first above written. WESTERN ADA RECREATION DISTRICT : ShauffWardle, Board President CITY OF MERIDIAN ; Robert E . Simison, Mayor Attest , Chris Johnson, City Clerk AGREEMENT FOR TRANSFER OF WARD ' S REAL PROPERTY TO CITY OF MERIDIAN PAGE 4 C� E IDIAN Planning and Zoning Department Presentation and Outline h2 City Council MeetingSeptember 24,2024 ZoningAerialFLUM Examples from Design Standards the east and west legs.turn lane on turn lane and 1 dedicated rightthrough/rightturn lanes; 1 eastbound receiving lanes; 2 eastbound left2 4. Plan approval for the Ten Mile/Grand Mogul Intersection Intersection3. Signal warrant analysis for the Grand Mogul/Black Cat 2. Signal warrant analysis for the Umbria Hills/Franklin Intersection1. Roundabout analysisACHD is requiring the following with the first phase:sewer extensions) needs throughout the lifespan of the project.Phasing is critical to understand the infrastructure (roads and water and 2040.Black Cat Road is expected to be widened between 2036Ten Mile is currently operating at a LOS F.Heavy congestion at the Ten Mile Interchange.ITD requested a TIS function.the land uses approved in this area impact how these roads will Project is extending the road network consistent with TMISAP however land uses.which work in concert with the underlying street parking pedestrian elements, and onto support bike lanes, wider sidewalks, TMISAP has specific street cross sections residential).. of nonsq.ft(389,000 FarmstoneMeridian 118 (552 MF units), and (256 residential lots, Avaniresidential), . of nonsq.ftCat Industrial (One million Black Other developments in the area land uses and transportation impacts. of employment uses is needed to balance residential uses however a higher density project will contribute to the mix of nonresidential and 52% residential uses. This adopted in 2007, it envisioned 48% nonand 73% residential. When the plan was residential at the time reflected 27% nonUse Analysis for the TMISAP. The analysis In 2022, Planning staff prepared a Land Changes to Agenda: Item #4: District at Ten Mile (H-2023-0071) Application(s): Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Amendment Development Agreement Modification Rezone Preliminary Plat Size of property, existing zoning, and location: This site consists of 108.77-acres of land, zoned C-C, M-E, H-E, R-40 and TN-C, located at the NWC of I-84 and S. Ten Mile Rd. A preliminary plat was previously approved on the SW portion of the property for Vanguard Village; a final plat is currently in process. History: The subject property was previously annexed in 2009 & 2011 with the Meridian Crossing, the Ten Mile Annexation and The 10 at Meridian applications and are subject to DA’s. Comprehensive Plan FLUM Designation: Mixed Employment (ME); High Density Employment (HDE), Mixed Use – Commercial (MU- Com), Mixed Use – Residential (MU-Res). Summary of Request: The Applicant requests an Amendment to the FLUM in the Comp Plan to change the designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent properties, resulting in a net change in this area as follows: (+9.26-acres) Medium High-Density Residential (MHDR), (+2.66-acres) High Density Residential (HDR); (-10.61-acres) Mixed Use - Residential (MU-R), (+0.32-acre) Mixed Use - Commercial (MU-C), (-0.22-acre) Mixed Employment (ME), and (-1.40-acres) High Density Employment (HDE). The map amendment includes some “clean-up” changes recommended by Staff on the abutting property to the west (Endurance Holdings, zoned R-15 & mostly designated MHDR); and the ROW for W. Cobalt Dr. along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to Outer Banks Subdivision (zoned C-C & designated MU-Res) based on the existing multi-family entitlements on those parcels and the Applicant’s proposed amendment (see pink/white dashed line area on the exhibit). Without including the proposed clean-up changes on adjacent properties, the changes to this property are as follows: -2.8-acres of MHDR, no change to HDR, +2.3-acres of ME, +3.74- acres of MU-Com, and no change to HDE. In summary, most of the Applicant’s proposed changes are just a reconfiguration of existing FLUM designations and not significant changes. Rezone of 7.48-acres of land from the C-C to the TN-C district; 12.96-acres from the H-E & R-40 to the C-C district; 9.13-acres from the C-C to the H-E district; 25.97-acres from the C-C & H-E to the C-G district; and 1.37-acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district. Preliminary Plat consisting of 38 building lots & (1) common lot on 108.77-acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G, H-E & M-E districts. A Modification is proposed to the existing DA’s for Vanguard Village, Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC, SJJV LLC, Janicek Properties LLC and The 10 at Meridian to consolidate them into one (1) new agreement, which will replace the previous agreements (or a portion thereof, as applicable for Vanguard Village & The 10 at Meridian), and include a conceptual development plan for the overall area. A Use Area Plan is also proposed as follows: Area 1) accommodates a mix of multi-family residential such as townhomes and multi-family. This area is mostly designated MU-Com with MU-Res and a small amount of MHDR and zoned mostly TN-C with some C-C. The map amendment proposes a MU-Res land use designation with TN-C zoning for the entire area. A residential density of 8 to 12 units/acre is proposed which equates to 268-402 residential units. A diversity of compatible land uses is encouraged in MU-Res areas, which may include a mix of residential, office, retail, recreational, employment and other miscellaneous uses. While the focus is on residential uses, the horizontal and vertical integration of retail, office and employment uses is essential. This designation requires developments to integrate the three (3) major use categories – residential, commercial and employment. Only residential uses are proposed in the requested MU-Res FLUM designation and TN-C zoning district – the “mixed-use” component of the MU-Res designation and TN-C district is entirely missing. Only one of the three major use categories are proposed (i.e. residential) – no retail, office or employment uses are proposed as required, which are essential in MU-Res designated areas. The proposed MU-Res designation and TN-C zoning is not consistent with the proposed development plan or the intended plan for this area as the required mix of integrated uses is not provided. Area 2) accommodates predominantly commercial mixed uses, including large format/anchor and specialty retail, casual and fine dining, entertainment, recreation, hospitality, childcare and office uses. This area is currently designated mostly MU-Res and MU-Com with a small amount of HDE; the zoning is mostly C-C with some H-E and M-E. The map amendment proposes MU-Com and HDE land use designations with C-C, H-E, C-G and M-E zoning with the majority being C-C. The MU-Com designation encourages the development of a mix of office, retail, recreational, employment (i.e. family-wage jobs) and other miscellaneous uses with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses. While the focus of these areas is on commercial and employment uses, the horizontal and vertical integration of residential uses is essential to securing entitlements. As with all mixed-use areas, this designation requires development to integrate the three (3) major use categories – residential, commercial and employment. In MU-Com areas, three (3) or more significant uses also tend to be larger scale projects. Although a mix of commercial uses are proposed, only one of the three major use categories is provided (i.e. commercial) – no major employment uses are proposed as required in either the MU-Com or the HDE areas and integrated residential uses are not proposed in the MU-Com area, which are essential. The proposed MU-Com and HDE designations are not consistent with the proposed development plan or the intended plan for this area as the required mix of uses is not provided. The proposed Floor Area Ratios are also significantly below the goals of 1.00-1.25 or more in the MU-Com area and exceeding 1.0 in the HDE area. • Area 3) accommodates medium to higher-density office, commercial, recreation, medical and hospitality uses. This area is currently designated MU-Com and HDE with C-C, M-E and H-E zoning. The Applicant proposes a reconfiguration of the MU-Com and HDE areas and a rezone to reconfigure the boundaries of the C-C, H-E and M-E districts accordingly and add C-G zoning. The Applicant also proposes to change a “sliver” of the HDE area along the west boundary in Areas 2 and 3 of the Use Area Plan to ME and rezone from H-E to M-E for the southern portion of that area to match that of the abutting property to the west and to align with the future lot line. The ME area will be developed by Adler Industrial separate from this development. As previously noted, the FAR’s in the MU-Com and HDE areas are significantly below the established goals in the Plan. Although commercial and employment uses are proposed from the three (3) major use categories, integration of residential uses is not proposed as desired. Office and other employment uses need to be of a much higher intensity in this area in order to be consistent with the MU-Com and especially the HDE designation and designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development Recreation uses are not desired in HDE designated areas. An open space exhibit and a mobility plan was submitted showing vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle circulation within the site. Typically, all building elevations should comply with the design guidelines in the TMISAP and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. However, the Applicant requests that these guidelines and standards not apply to this development and instead proposes alternate design standards and a design review process of their own for the proposed development as part of the development agreement. While all of the proposed design standards may not expressly align with the guidelines in the TMISAP, they seem to generally follow the guidelines and should ensure a high quality of development IF Council deems the proposed plan appropriate for this area. Staff Recommendation: In summary, Staff is not in support of the proposed map amendment and associated rezone based on the proposed conceptual development plan as it doesn’t meet the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP nor does it provide the mix of integrated uses desired in Mixed Use designated areas or the intensity and/or types of uses desired in the MU-Com and HDE designated areas. Commission Recommendation: Approval per Staff’s recommended alternative FLUM designations and zoning Summary of Commission Public Hearing: i. In favor: Tonn Peterson & Elizabeth Allen, Ball Ventures Ahlquist (Applicant); Geoff Wardle, Clark Wardle; Colin Ronhaar, Ardurra – Applicant Representatives ii. In opposition: None iii. Commenting: Jenny Defrates iv. Written testimony: Kristina Bolt; Geoff Wardle, Clark Wardle (Applicant’s Representative) v. Key Issue(s) of public testimony: Concern that the proposed development will increase the traffic gridlock on Ten Mile, Franklin & I-84. Desire for preservation of the existing (cedar?) tree along Ten Mile Rd. and any other trees on the site. In support of the services and shopping opportunities proposed within the development. Against the proposed development. Key Issue(s) of Discussion by Commission: Agreement with Staff that the proposed development plan is not consistent with the TMISAP. Concurrence that the TMISAP being 17 years old may be outdated and there may be a need to refresh it to reflect current conditions. General agreement that the proposed development plan is appropriate for this area and supports Staff’s suggested path forward with FLUM designations and zoning districts. Commission Change(s) to Staff Recommendation: Commission recommended approval to Council with the additional recommendation that Council consider if the proposed FLUM designations & zoning are consistent with the proposed development plan and whether those need to be modified as recommended by Staff. NOTE: If Council is of the opinion the proposed development plan is more appropriate for this area than that envisioned in the adopted TMISAP, Staff suggests alternate FLUM designations and zoning are approved consistent with the proposed development plan, as follows: MHDR and R-15 zoning for the property in Area 1; and Commercial and C-G zoning in Areas 2 and 3. Outstanding Issue(s) for City Council: Staff requested the Applicant submit a phasing plan for the overall development to understand the timing of infrastructure improvements – the Applicant has declined to do so. Written Testimony since Commission Hearing: 13 letters of testimony, all in opposition of the proposed project, have been received since the Commission hearing that are included in the public record; some of the concerns include traffic congestion in the area and especially Ten Mile Rd., over capacity of area schools, against the proposed changes to TMISAP, inadequate infrastructure (no City parks/recreation areas nearby), water resource concerns and against more high-density housing in this area. Possible Motions: Approval After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to approve File Number H-2023-0071, as presented in the staff report for the hearing date of September 24, 2024: (Add any proposed modifications to conditions) Denial After considering all staff, applicant and public testimony, I move to deny File Number H-2023-0071, as presented during the hearing on September 24, 2024, for the following reasons: (You should state specific reasons for denial) Continuance I move to continue File Number H-2023-0071 to the hearing date of ____________ for the following reason(s): (You should state specific reason(s) for continuance.) W IDIAN� AGENDA ITEM ITEM TOPIC: Public Hearing continued from September 17, 2024 for District at Ten Mile (H-2023-0071) by Ball Ventures Ahlquist, generally located at the northwest corner of S. Ten Mile Rd. and 1-84 Application Materials: https://bit.ly/H-2023-0071 A. Request: Future Land Use Map Amendment to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan to change the designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent properties, resulting in a net change in the area as follows: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) (+9.26 acres), High Density Residential (HDR) (+2.66 acres), Mixed-Use Residential (MU-R) (-10.61 acres), Mixed-Use Commercial (MU-C) (+0.32 acre), Mixed Employment (ME) (-0.22 acre) and High Density Employment (HDE) (-1.40 acres) as requested by the Applicant and as recommended by Staff on adjacent properties if the Applicant's request is approved. B. Request: Modified Development Agreements to the existing Development Agreements (Vanguard Village (H-2021-0081) Inst .#2022-049799, Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073618, SJJV LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073617, Janicek Properties LLC (AZ-11-001) Inst. #112073616, to consolidate them into one (1) new agreement, which will replace the previous agreements (or a portion thereof, as applicable) and include a conceptual development plan for the overall area. C. Request: Rezone of 7.48 acres of land from the C-C to the TN-C district, 12.96 acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district, 9.13 acres from the C-C to the H-E district, 25.97 acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district, and 1.37 acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district. D. Request: Preliminary Plat consisting of 38 building lost and one (1) common lot on 108.77 acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G, WE and M-E zoning districts. i I PUBLIC HEARING SIGN IN SHEET DATE: September 17, 2024 ITEM # ON AGENDA: 4 3 PROJECT NAME: District at Ten Mile (H-2023-0071) Your Full Name Your Full Address Representing I wish to testify (Please Print) HOA? (mark X if yes) If yes, please l provide HOA name 1D o o`ij Ro Qwrllq-v— A/W PA 1 0) 2,6b'-3- IV 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C��fERJMAN*, DEPARTMENT REPORT i Qa H o HEARING 9/24/2024 - IN I �: DATE: Continued from:911012024& 911712024 low TO: Mayor&City Council .___---__ , FROM: Sonya Allen,Associate Planner 00 208-884-5533 --- sallen@meridiancity.org _��iJ— __ - APPLICANT: Ball Ventures Ahlquist -,- SUBJECT: H-2023-0071 Legend _ Project Location c J District at Ten Mile-CPAM,MDA, i.: - _Area of Impact RZ,PP := City Limits LOCATION: Northwest corner of S.Ten Mile Rd. & O Analysis o 1-84 in Section 15,T.3N.,R.1W. I. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Summary The Applicant has submitted applications for the following: • Amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan(CPAM)to change the designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent properties,resulting in a net change in this area as follows: Medium High-Density Residential(MHDR) (+9.26- acres),High Density Residential(HDR) (+2.66-acres); Mixed Use-Residential(MU-R) (-10.61-acres),Mixed Use -Commercial(MU-C) (+0.32-acre),Mixed Employment (ME)(-0.22-acre), and High Density Employment(HDE)(-1.40-acres); • Modification to the existing Development Agreements(MDA)(Vanguard Village H- 2021-0081,Inst.#2022-049799; Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC AZ-11-001, Inst.#112073618; SJJV LLC AZ-11-001, Inst. #112073617;Janicek Properties LLC AZ-11-001, Inst. #112073616)to consolidate them into one(1)new agreement,which will replace the previous agreements (or a portion thereof, as applicable for Vanguard Village),and include a conceptual development plan for the overall area; • Rezone(RZ)of 7.48-acres of land from the C-C to the TN-C district; 12.96-acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district; 9.13-acres from the C-C to the H-E district;25.97- acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district; and 1.37-acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district; and • Preliminary Plat(PP) consisting of 38 building lots and one(1)common lot on 108.77- acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G,H-E and M-E zoning districts. B. Issues The proposed conceptual development plan,use area plan and intensity of development is not consistent with the development guidelines in the TMISAP for the proposed FLUM designations. City of Meridian I Department Report 1. Project Overview Further,the TN-C zoning is not an appropriate zone for the proposed multi-family residential development(see analysis in Section III below for more information). C. Recommendation Staff: Staff is in support of the proposed plat but is not in support of the proposed MDA,CPAM and RZ applications as the proposed development plan doesn't meet the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP and doesn't provide the mix of integrated uses desired in Mixed Use designated areas. If Council is of the opinion the proposed development plan is more appropriate for this area than that envisioned in the adopted TMISAP, Staff recommends alternate FLUM designations and zoning are approved consistent with the proposed development plan,as follows: MHDR and R-15 zoning for the property in Area 1; and Commercial and C-G zoning in Areas 2 and 3, as shown in the second map in Section VII.0 below. Otherwise, Staff recommends denial of the proposed MDA, CPAM and RZ applications. Commission: Recommend approval to Council with the additional recommendation that Council consider if the proposed FLUM designations &zoning are consistent with the proposed development plan and whether those need to be modified. D. Decision Pending II. COMMUNITY METRICS Table 1: Land Use Description Details Map Ref. Existing Land Use(s) Agricultural - Proposed Land Use(s) A variety of uses are proposed consisting of multi-family - residential(apartments&townhome style);commercial (large format/anchor and specialty retail,restaurants, entertainment,recreation,hospitality,childcare,office); and employment(medium to higher density office, commercial,recreation,medical and hospitality uses). (See Use Area Plan in Section V.H) Existing/Proposed Zoning Existing:H-E(High-density Employment),C-C VII.A.2 (Community Business),TN-C(Traditional Neighborhood Center) Proposed:TN-C(33.42-acres),C-C(59.11-acres),C-G (General Retail and Service Commercial)(25.97-acres), M-E(Mixed Employment)(10.19-acres)and H-E(34.82- acres) Ad Existing/Proposed Future Land Use Existing:MHDR(Medium-high Density Residential),MU- VII.A.3 Designation Res(Mixed Use—Residential),Mixed Use—Commercial (MU-Com),HDE(High-density Employment) Proposed:MHDR(on adjacent property only),MU-Res, MU-Com,HDE Table 2:Process Facts Description Details Preapplication Meeting date Tuesday,November 21,2023 Neighborhood Meeting 12/4/2023 Site posting date 8/5/2024 City of Meridian I Department Report II.Community Metrics Table 3: Community Metrics Agency/Element Description/Issue Reference Ada County Highway District • Comments Received No • Commission Action Required No • Access S.Ten Mile Rd.,arterial street • Traffic Level of Service F Traffic Impact Study(Y/N) No(ACHD didn't require one;ITD is requesting one) ITD Comments Received Yes—ITD requests a Traffic Impact Study for this development as impacts to the State Highway System are anticipated due to the type and proximity of the development. Meridian Fire Distance to Station:2.1 miles to Station#2;Response Time: 3 minutes Meridian Police Distance to Station:5.9 miles;Response Time:4:13 minutes Meridian Public Works Wastewater Distance to Mainline: Sewer is in S. Ten Mile Rd. and stubbed to this property—it's in the process of being extended to the west in S.Vanguard Way to serve this site; Impacts or Concerns: See Public Works comments Meridian Public Works Water Distance to Mainline:Water is in S. Ten Mile Rd. and stubbed to this property—it's in the process of being extended to the west in S.Vanguard Way to serve this site (pressure zone 2);Impacts or Concerns: See Public Works comments See City/Agency Comments and Conditions Section for all department/agency and the public record for comments received on this application. City of Meridian I Department Report II.Community Metrics Figure 1:One-Mile Radius Existing Condition Metrics Reference Parcel:51215131401 Date Retrieved:2024 18/6 Parcel Count Parcel Acreage I nfill Indicator: 156 709 Surrounding Area 314% ► of city ® City Limits 1,429 ■ Not City 7 7Q7 Household Change Household& Population Growth ■ Households 02020 Population Change:34.5% Population ■Growth (Household and Population Change since 2010 Decennial) 5,000 10,000 15,000 Use Types Residential Addresses All Addresses ■ Single-family 72% 69% 4% ❑ Multi-family 28% 27% ® Commercial Preliminary Plats(last 5-years) Conditional Use Permit(last 5-years) Proposed Proposed Pending Pending Approved Approved 0 1000 2D00 3000 4000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 ■ Single-family Multi-family 2.00 - 1,000 Single-family °i 1.50 Residential u C a Parcel Diversity N 1.00 Soo U O Parcel Count in 0.50 u m Q.10 *Average Acres 0.00 0.00 u.14 a 0 R-2 R-4 R-8 R-15 Average Single-family Density by Zoning Average 15.00 aiResidential NetDensity Q 10.00 010.04 o 0 7.30 5.00 $.20 o.00 ____qa•39_____q0:00 Dwelling Units 1 Acre R-2 R-4 R-S R-15 City of Meridian I Department Report II.Community Metrics Figure 2: Service Impact Summary Ready OW 0 0 0 0 a Marginal Caution �y�o�ye C:e��t 00 a ��\ie Q0\�`e ��4 ���� a\o� \���� \Q`\�e 4 ` M. aC.°c roo .�o° Qac oa �' S Q- III. STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code(UDC) A. History This overall property consists of several parcels of previously annexed land governed by five(5) different Development Agreements (DA) (i.e. The 10 at Meridian;Vanguard Village; Fedrizzi Ten Mile,LLC;Janicek Properties Ten Mile; and SJJV,LLC).The southwest portion of this site (Parcel#1215427850)was included in the Vanguard Village preliminary plat;the final plat is currently in process.Links to these agreements are provided below in Table 4. The existing DA's for Fedrizzi, Janicek and SJJV do not include a conceptual development plan but do include provisions for future development of the property and restrictions on certain uses. Prior to development, an amendment to these agreements is required to include a conceptual development plan that demonstrates compliance with the TMISAP. The DA for Vanguard Village includes a conceptual development plan, shown in Section VI.F below, and provisions for future development of the property consistent with the TMISAP; an amendment to the DA was recently approved but has not yet been recorded.Note: The amended DA does not affect the subject property. The concept plan included in the DA for The 10 at Meridian,the adjacent property to the north, did not include a development plan for the property at the northeast corner of this site that was previously part of that development. Table 4:Proiect Overview Description Details History AZ-09-008 (Meridian Crossing—Ord.#10-1467;DA Inst.#110115738); AZ-11-001 [Ten Mile Annexation—Ord.#12-1520(Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC—DA Inst.#112073618,Janicek Properties Ten Mile—DA Inst. #112073616,SJJV,LLC—DA Inst.#112073617)];H-2021-0025(The 10 at Meridian—Ord.#21-1948,DA Inst.#2021-132704);H-2021-0081 [Vanguard Village—RZ,PP,CUP,MDA Inst.#2022-049799(replaced previous DA#110115738);H-2023-0072(Vanguard Village—MDA not yet recorded);FP-2024-0012(Vanguard Village FP,PS—currently in process) Phasing Plan 1 Physical Features The Purdam Gulch Drain crosses this site.The Williams Northwest gas pipeline crosses the southwest portion of this site that's part of the Vanguard Village plat. Acreage 108.77-acres(preliminary plat); 163.67-acres(DA boundary) 38 building lots; 1 common lot City of Meridian Department Report 111. Staff Analysis B. General Overview Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment: This property is within the area governed by the Ten Mile Interchange Specific Area Plan (TMISAP),which is part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map(FLUM) in the Plan is proposed to change the land use designations on portions of the subject property and adjacent abutting property and right-of-way,resulting in a net change in this area as follows: (see FLUMMap-Adopted vs. Proposed in Section VT C below) Net Land Use Change =Total Change0 Med-High Density Residential 9.26 High Density Residential 2.56 MU-Res 1.51 MU-Com (11.80) Mixed Employment (0.22) High Density Employment (1.40) Total (0.001 The map amendment includes some"clean-up"changes recommended by Staff on the abutting property to the west(Endurance Holdings—Parcel#S1215244200,zoned R-15 and mostly designated MHDR); and the right-of-way for W. Cobalt Dr. along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to Outer Banks Subdivision(zoned C-C and designated MU-Res)based on the existing multi-family entitlements on those parcels and the Applicant's proposed amendment(see pink/white dashed line area on the exhibit in Section V.0 below).Without including the proposed clean-up changes on adjacent properties,the changes to this property are as follows: -2.8-acres of MHDR,no change to HDR,+2.3-acres of ME,+3.74-acres of MU-Com, and no change to HDE. In summary,most of the Applicant's proposed changes are just a reconfiguration of existing FLUM designations and not significant changes. Development Agreement Modification: A new Development Agreement(DA) is proposed to consolidate and replace all of the existing DA's(i.e.Vanguard Village H-2021-0081, Inst. #2022-049799; Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC AZ-11- 001,Inst. #112073618; SJJV LLC AZ-11-001, Inst.#112073617;Janicek Properties LLC AZ-11- 001,Inst. #112073616)on the subject property. A new conceptual development plan is proposed for the overall area as shown in Section V.G below; the existing conceptual development plan for Vanguard Village is included in Section V.F below—changes are proposed to that plan. The other DA's do not include conceptual development plans and require modifications to the agreements to include one prior to development. A phasing plan is not proposed for the overall development plan.As this is critical in understanding timing for infrastructure improvements, Staff recommends one is submitted prior to the City Council hearing. The Applicant has declined to do so. Rezone: A rezone of 7.48-acres of land is proposed from the C-C to the TN-C district, 12.96-acres from the H-E and R-40 to the C-C district,9.13-acres from the C-C to the H-E district,25.97-acres from the C-C and H-E to the C-G district,and 1.37-acres from the H-E to the M-E zoning district. With the proposed rezone, a significant amount(i.e. 21+/-acres) of the H-E zoned area will be lost and replaced with C-C and C-G zoning,which will likely further decrease the amount and intensity of employment uses in this area because a wider range of uses are allowed in the C-C and C-G districts than the H-E district(i.e. allowed uses in the H-E zone consist of corporate headquarters, office complexes,research and development facilities and complementary services such as conference centers and hospitality use with limited retail; allowed uses in the C-C district are larger scale and broader mix of retail,office and service uses; allowed uses in the C-G district are the largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office, service and light industrial uses). This will result in less employment uses(i.e. family wage jobs) in this area than anticipated,which is a key City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis component of the TMISAP. Note: If Council approves an amendment to the FLUM for the proposed development plan and Staffs recommended associated"clean-up"items, a rezone from H-E to M-E (on the southern portion of the site) and C-C to R-40 (Cobalt right-of-way) should also be approved. Preliminary Plat: A preliminary plat is proposed consisting of 38 building lots and one(1)common lot on 108.77- acres of land in the TN-C, C-C, C-G,H-E and M-E zoning districts. The plat does not include the Vanguard Village property. The plat is proposed to be developed in one(1)final plat phase. Staff recommends the subject property is subdivided prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancies within the development. Permanent addresses cannot be assigned until Ada County has approved street names. C. Site Development and Use Analysis 1. Existing Structures/Site Improvements (UDC 11-1): There are no existing structures on this site; infrastructure improvements are currently being constructed. 2. Proposed Use Analysis (UDC 11-2): A Use Area Plan was submitted with this application and included below in Section VI.H. The Plan depicts three (3)different areas;however,the boundaries of these areas do not coincide with the proposed FLUM designation boundaries,which makes determining consistency with the FLUM designations difficult. These areas are as follows: • Area 1) accommodates a mix of multi-family residential such as townhomes and multi- family. This area is mostly designated MU-Com with MU-Res and a small amount of MHDR and zoned mostly TN-C with some C-C. The map amendment proposes a MU-Res land use designation with TN-C zoning for the entire area. The Applicant states a gross density of 8 to 12 units/acre based on 268 to 402 residential units on 33.42-acres of land is proposed, consistent with the density range desired in the MU-R designation. A diversity of compatible land uses is encouraged in MU-Res areas,which may include a mix of residential,office,retail,recreational, employment and other miscellaneous uses. While the focus is on residential uses,the horizontal and vertical integration of retail,office and employment uses is essential.This designation requires developments to integrate the three(3) major use categories—residential, commercial and employment. Live-work units are strongly encouraged as are a variety of other housing types. Office, employment and commercial uses are generally small in scale and focused on neighborhood services within the MU-Res area. Traditional neighborhood design concepts—higher density buildings close to the street, easy pedestrian access,narrower streets to slow traffic,parking lots behind or under buildings, and residences with porches or balconies facing the street—are essential.The mix of uses should allow for a diversity of housing with for-sale and rental properties and may be achieved horizontally throughout the site;however,vertical mixes within buildings are highly encouraged. The goal to achieve in these areas is a floor area ratio (FAR)of 0.75 or more.No more than 40%of land area within MU-Res areas should be utilized for non- residential uses.An overall target density of 8 to 12 dwelling units per acre is desired with higher densities allowed on individual projects. City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis The purpose of the TN-C district is to serve as the focal point of a neighborhood center, containing retail,commercial,and community services to meet the daily needs of community residents within a one-to two-mile radius.It's pedestrian oriented and is designed to encourage pedestrian connection with a traditional neighborhood residential district.Uses in the TN-C district includes small-scale retail, restaurants,recreational,personal services,public or quasi-public uses, churches,and attached and multi-family dwellings. The allowed uses for the TN-C zoning district are listed in UDC Table 11-2D-2; the proposed uses(i.e. multi-family and townhouses)are principally permitted in the TN-C district. The standards for the TN-C district are listed in UDC 11-2D-5,as follows: maximum building height is 45-feet(additional height may be allowed as noted in UDC 11-2D-3B);minimum number of stories for new construction adjacent to any street is two (2); maximum building footprint is 20,000 square feet,however, other than retail,all other uses may be allowed a footprint of greater than 20,000 square feet through the conditional use permit process; and minimum contiguous district size is 6-acres,or 2- acres when adjacent to property with a mixed-use future land use designation. Only residential uses are proposed in the requested MU-Res FLUM designation and TN-C zoning district—the"mixed-use"component of the designation and TN-C district is entirely missing.Only one of the three major use categories are proposed (i.e.residential)—no retail, office or employment uses are proposed as required, which are essential in MU-Res designated areas.The proposed MU-Res designation and TN-C zoning is not consistent with the proposed development plan or the intended plan for this area as the required mix of integrated uses is not provided. • Area 2)accommodates predominantly commercial mixed uses, including large format/anchor and specialty retail,casual and fine dining,entertainment,recreation, hospitality,childcare and office uses. This area is currently designated mostly MU-Res and MU-Com with a small amount of HDE;the zoning is mostly C-C with some H-E and M-E. The map amendment proposes MU-Com and HDE land use designations with C-C,H-E, C-G and M-E zoning with the majority being C-C. The MU-Com designation encourages the development of a mix of office,retail, recreational,employment(i.e. family-wage jobs) and other miscellaneous uses with supporting multi-family or single-family attached residential uses. While the focus of these areas is on commercial and employment uses,the horizontal and vertical integration of residential uses is essential to securing entitlements.As with all mixed-use areas,this designation requires development to irate,-rate the three(3) major use categories—residential, commercial and employment.In MU-Com areas, three(3)or more significant uses also tend to be larger scale projects. This designation is intended to provide flexibility and encourage developers to build innovative projects. Traditional neighborhood design concepts with a strong pedestrian-oriented focus are essential. The goal to achieve in these areas is a FAR of 1.00-1.25 or more. Development should exhibit quality building and site design and an attractive street character. The mix of residential uses may be achieved vertically within buildings;however, some horizontal mixes may be allowed. This designation calls for an overall target density of 8 to 12 units per acre with higher densities allowed on individual projects.No more than 30%of the ground level development within the MU-Com designation should be used for residences. HDE areas are recommended as predominantly office,research and specialized employment areas; and generally do not include retail and consumer service uses serving the wider community. Limited retail and service establishments primarily serving City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis employees and users of the HDE area are encouraged. These areas should provide a variety of flexible sites for small, local or start-up businesses, as well as sites for large national or regional enterprises.They should be designed to encourage multi-modal travel and convenient circulation to supporting services located within the area. Whenever ^.2505F 5.000 Sr S. )� 21 050 Sr ^ ^ ``115,\86o SF MU-RE5 24OW5F L V K.YF 1 13.500 SF 4,5005' —'S505F 2]1]W SF MU-COM m I 3,4005E 16,8755E I1 i\ n, 7.5005F 4.275SF �fi,0005F I I W.VILLAGGIO WAY f 151 109505EP .._........... .. ��3i305F 8,5505E � 10 300 SF 1^ 25.000 u t 0,0005E 45.4505E SF 9.4505F30.750 SF———— 9 rI lf ],500 SF 7.V00 SF 20.250 SF 25.000 SF I` CC 26,800 SF 147,150 SF HDE 18.000 SF 24 200 SF W,NAVIGATOR WAY t< 1.8.000 SF 57.100 SF I4,000 SF 20,5005E _ 18000 SF 73800 SF 1NTERSTq , , ,E✓19 ' possible,HDE areas should provide restaurants,lodging and other services in support of the employment uses and be designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development. It's anticipated that buildings will range in height from 1 to 6 stories,have total floor areas of 10,000 to 1,000,000 square feet, and that the FAR will exceed 1.0. Designs that promote open space and parks are strongly encouraged. Structured parking is also allowed. Land use types desired in HDE areas are corporate, business and professional offices;research facilities and laboratories; and complementary uses primarily serving district employees and users, such as business services,conference centers, child care,restaurants, convenience retail, and hotels and motels. Per UDC Table 11-2B-1,allowed uses in the C-C district are larger scale and a broader mix of retail, office and service uses located with access to arterials or non-residential collectors; allowed uses in the C-G district are the largest scale and broadest mix of retail, office, service and light industrial uses in close proximity and/or access to interstate or arterial intersections; allowed uses in the M-E district are offices, medical centers, research and development facilities, and light industrial uses with ancillary support services with access to arterial or collector; and allowed uses in the H-E district are corporate headquarters, office complexes,research and development facilities and complementary services such as conference centers and hospitality use with limited retail in close proximity to Federal and State highway interchanges and major arterials. The allowed uses for the C-C, C-G,M-E and H-E zoning district are listed in UDC Table 11- 2E-2;the dimensional standards are listed in UDC Table I1-2B-3. The Applicant submitted a plan shown below that depicts building square footages for the 76.15-acre HDE area totaling 533,450 s.f. resulting in a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.16 and for the 64.21-acre MU-Com area totaling 489,640 s.f.resulting in a FAR of 0.18, which is significantly below the goal of 1.00-1.25 or more in the MU-Com area and exceeding 1.0 in the HDE area. Development in these areas needs to be much more intense in the MU-Com and HDE designated areas and designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development in order to be consistent with the Plan. City of Meridian I Department Report 111. Staff Analysis Although a mix of commercial uses are proposed,only one of the three major use categories is provided(i.e. commercial)—no major employment uses are proposed as required in either the MU-Com or the HDE areas and integrated residential uses are not proposed in the MU-Com area,which are essential. The proposed MU-Com and HDE designations are not consistent with the proposed development plan or the intended plan for this area as the required mix of uses is not provided—significant changes to the concept plan and use area plan would be needed in order to be consistent. Area 3) accommodates medium to higher-density office,commercial,recreation,medical and hospitality uses. This area is currently designated MU-Corn and HDE with C-C,M-E and H-E zoning. The Applicant proposes a reconfiguration of the MU-Com and HDE areas and a rezone to reconfigure the boundaries of the C-C,H-E and M-E districts accordingly and add C-G zoning. The Applicant also proposes to change a"sliver"of the HDE area along the west boundary in Areas 2 and 3 of the Use Area Plan to ME and rezone from H-E to M-E for the southern portion of that area to match that of the abutting property to the west and to align with the future lot line. The ME area will be developed by Adler Industrial separate from this development. See above for information on MU-Corn and HDE designated areas and associated analysis.As noted above,the FAR's in the MU-Com and HDE areas are significantly below the established goals in the Plan.Although commercial and employment uses are proposed from the three(3)major use categories,integration of residential uses is not proposed as desired.Office and other employment uses need to be of a much higher intensity in this area in order to be consistent with the MU-Com and especially the HDE designation and designed as compact urban centers rather than lower density suburban-style development Recreation uses are not desired in HDE designated areas. In 2022,Planning Staff prepared a Land Use Analysis for the Mayor& Council related to alignment of development approvals within the Ten Mile Area in relation to the TMISAP itself.The Plan was adopted in 2007 and encompasses 2,200 acres; this area was planned foremost to serve as an employment area with supporting residential uses to balance transportation impacts and to provide for unique lifestyle opportunities. The Plan is envisioned by land use area(acres)to be approximately 48% non-residential and 52% residential. The analysis at that time reflected 27% non-residential and 73% residential; additional approvals since that time are referenced in Section VII.A.S,there have been no updates to this analysis.Much more and a higher density of employment uses are needed in this area to provide jobs for area residents and balance transportation impacts. In summary, Staff is not in support of the proposed map amendment and associated rezone based on the conceptual development plan proposed as it doesn't meet the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP nor does it provide the mix of integrated uses desired in Mixed Use designated areas or the intensity and/or types of uses desired in the MU-Com and HDE designated areas. If Council is of the opinion the proposed development plan is more appropriate for this area than that envisioned in the adopted TMISAP,Staff suggests alternate FLUM designations and zoning are approved consistent with the proposed development plan, as follows: MHDR and R-15 zoning for the property in Area 1; and Commercial and C- G zoning in Areas 2 and 3 (see second adopted vs.proposed FLUM exhibit in Section City of Meridian I Department Report III. Staff Analysis VII.C). Note: The City Council previously approved an alternate FL UM designation of Commercial for the Ten Mile Crossing development across Ten Mile Rd. to the east that deviated from the TMISAP. 3. Dimensional Standards (UDC 11-2): See UDC Table 11-2B-3 for the dimensional standards of the C-C, C-G,M-E and H-E zoning districts; and UDC 11-2D-5 for the TN-C district. 4. Specific Use Standards (UDC 11-4-3): The future multi-family development must comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-4-3- 27. Other uses as noted in the applicable Allowed Use table may require compliance with specific use standards. D. Design Standards Analysis 1. Existing structure and Site Design Standards (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-19): Future development should comply with the structure and site design standards listed in UDC 11-3A-19;review for compliance with these standards will take place with future development applications. Comprehensive Plan Policy#3.07.01A-"Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through buffering, screening, transitional densities, and other best site design practices." 2. Qualified Open Space&Amenities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-4-3-27): The future multi-family development should comply with the open space and site amenity standards listed in UDC 11-4-3-27C, D.Review for compliance with these standards will take place with the Conditional Use Permit and/or Certificate of Zoning Compliance application for such, as applicable. An open space exhibit was submitted as shown in Section VII.L. Comprehensive Plan Policy 42.02.01E—"Encourage the development of high quality, dense residential and mixed-use areas near in and around Downtown, near employment, large shopping centers,public open spaces and parks, and along major transportation corridors, as shown on the Future Land Use Map." 3. Landscaping(Comp Plan, UDC 11-3B): Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02D—"Require appropriate building design, and landscaping elements to buffer, screen, beautify, and integrate commercial, multifamily, and parking lots into existing neighborhoods." i. Landscape buffers along streets A 35-foot wide street buffer is required along S. Ten Mile Rd.,an entryway corridor and arterial street; 20-foot wide street buffers are required along all collector streets(i.e. W. Cobalt Dr.,W. Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Umbria Hills Ave., S.Navigator Dr., and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way); and a 50-foot wide street buffer is required along I-84. Landscaping is required within the street buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C.Additional landscape design features are required along entryway corridors(i.e. S.Ten Mile Rd.). Street buffer landscaping is required to be provided with the subdivision improvements. ii. Parking lot landscaping Internal parking lot landscaping is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis I 1-3B-8C. iii. Landscape buffers to adjoining uses The C-C, C-G and H-E zoning districts require a 25-foot wide buffer to be provided to residential uses; landscaping and sometimes fencing(if the use can't be adequately buffered by landscaping)is required within the buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-9C. iv. Tree preservation Existing trees 4-inch caliper or greater that are removed from the site during development may require mitigation(see UDC 11-3B-10 for more information). v. Storm integration Stormwater integration is required in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-11 C. vi. Pathway landscaping Landscaping is required along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC I 1-3B-12C. 4. Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided with all development in accord with UDC standards. i. Residential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for the multi-family development in accord with the standards for such listed in UDC Table 11-3C-6.Note: Townhomes are considered multi family when not on individual lots. ii. Nonresidential parking analysis Off-street parking is required to be provided for non-residential uses in the commercial and traditional neighborhood districts in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C- 6B. iii. Bicycle parking analysis A minimum of one(1)bicycle parking is required to be provided for every 25 proposed vehicle parking spaces or portion thereof, except for single-family residences, duplexes and townhouses per UDC 11-3C-6G. Bicycle parking facilities should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3C-5C. 5. Building Elevations (Comp Plan,Architectural Standards Manual): Comprehensive Plan Policy#5.01.02—"Support beautiful and high-quality development that reinforces neighborhood character and sustainability." Typically,all building elevations should comply with the design guidelines in the TMISAP (see Application of Design Elements table on pg. 3-49) and the design standards listed in the Architectural Standards Manual. However,the Applicant requests that these guidelines and standards not apply to this development and instead proposes alternate design standards and a design review process of their own for the proposed development as part of the development agreement. The proposed project design standards incorporate site development and architectural design standards. The intent of which, as stated in the document, is to establish a set of criteria and procedures that will be used to implement The District at Ten Mile's land use policies to ensure economic viability and a high-quality standard of development that encourages flexibility, innovation, creativity and design elements within the overall development. These City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis standards are proposed to supersede the design guidelines in the TMISAP. The document proposes to create an overlay district and applies to all development within The District. Prior to submission of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance(CZC)application to the City,a Design Review application will be submitted to the Master Developer for review to ensure compliance with the Site Development and Design Standards. Once approval is granted,the application will then be submitted to The District at Ten Mile Architectural Review Committee(TDARC) for review and approval. Following both approvals,the CZC application can then be submitted to the City without further design approvals from the City. While all of the proposed design standards may not expressly align with the guidelines in the TMISAP,they appear to generally follow the guidelines and should ensure a high quality of development. These standards may not allow deviations to UDC standards. Note: The City Council previously approved alternate design standards to those in the ASM and the guidelines in the TMISAP for the Ten Mile Crossing development across Ten Mile Rd. to the east. The proposed design standards and process is similar to those. 6. Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, 11-3A-7): All/any fencing proposed on the site should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-6 for fencing along waterways and 11-3A-7. 7. Parkways(UDC 11-3A-17): All parkways should comply with the standards for such listed in UDC 11-3A-17. 8. Public Art—TMISAP (3-47) Public art in a high quality of design is required to be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-47). The Applicant should submit a plan depicting general locations of public art along with examples of the art proposed with the final plat as plies E. Transportation Analysis A Traffic Impact Study(TIS)was not submitted for this development as ACED did not require one. ITD is requesting a TIS for this development as impacts to the State Highway System are anticipated due to the type and proximity of the development. Collector streets are required to be constructed with development in accord with ACHD's Master Street Map(MSM). The preliminary plat depicts the extension of Villagio/Grand Mogul from S. Ten Mile Rd.to the west boundary of the subdivision,the extension of W. Cobalt Dr. to S. Umbria Hills Ave.,the extension of Umbria Hills south to Villagio/Grand Mogul, and the extension of W.Navigator Dr. to the west boundary of the site in accord with the MSM. The Street Section Map in the TMISAP requires Vanguard/Villagio from Ten Mile to the roundabout to be constructed in accord with Street Section B as a typical 4-lane parkway and west of the roundabout with Street Section C as a major collector street; Cobalt with Street Section D as a residential collector street; Umbria Hills with Street Section E as a minor collector street—because diagonal parking isn't appropriate for this section,Staff instead recommends this street is constructed as a residential collector in accord with Street Section D; and Navigator with Street Section C as a major collector street in accord with the following diagrams,unless otherwise required by ACHD: City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis r' �4 f ;• Lr I Lr lr Pr I n g �! I.,H L.* 4ngl�rw Neim' �raeFYxe NMLere RLr LAN 4e 91— y.w rI B G �'- [uMat��hdvam ' City of Meridian Department Report III. Staff Analysis c eFFdRI LIM? ave e e �SnP lane fi— {ur�ta•rurbd�tan€e D g Pew Irmitane Trae tialp I Farmiel Paking Lanr �. Lane Parkng I Cub•to-m6 ckkante 10 1 1]' na iinmLane I MEILBW tPht MgOMI Parking lane 6& Laos PaNng i Curb-ro-curbdunre Note:Street Section `E"is included for reference but not recommended to be constructed. Collector streets should be designed in accord with the street sections shown above as depicted on the Street Section Map in the TMISAP unless otherwise approved by ACHD with the exceptions of 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways in lieu of on-street bike lanes for public safety and the provision of on-street parking in areas not indicated for such where buildings are close to the street and parking is warranted. 1. Access (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-3, UDC 11-3H-4): Access is proposed via the extension of S.Umbria Hills Way from the north boundary; and the extension of W. Cobalt Dr., S.Vanguard Way/Villagio and W.Navigator Dr. from the east boundary of the site, all collector streets. Comprehensive Plan Policy#6.01.02B— "Reduce the number of existing access points onto arterial streets by using methods such as cross-access agreements, access management, and frontage/backage roads, and promoting local and collector street connectivity." City of Meridian I Department Report 11I. Staff Analysis 2. Multiuse Pathways (UDC 11-3A-5): Multi-use pathways are required to be provided with development in accord with the Pathways Master Plan. Per the plan,a 10-foot wide multi-use pathway is required along the Purdam Drain(or drain alignment)and should connect to the existing pathway in Baraya Subdivision to the north;within the street buffer along the east/west collector street(i.e. Villagio/Grand Mogul); and within the street buffer along I-84. A 14-foot wide public use easement is required for the multi-use pathways required by the Pathways Master Plan where they lie outside of public right-of-way and should be submitted to the Planning Division and recorded prior to City Engineer signature on the final plat. The easement and recorded instrument number should be depicted on the plat. 3. Pathways (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-8): All pathways should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-8. A mobility plan was submitted as shown in Section VII.M below showing vehicular, pedestrian,bicycle and service drives that demonstrate good connectivity throughout the site. 4. Sidewalks(UDC 11-3A-17): All sidewalks should be constructed in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-17. Staff recommends as a DA provision requiring 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways to be provided along all internal collector streets and those abutting this site(i.e. along the west boundary)in lieu of on-street bike lanes for public safety. 5. Private Streets(UDC 11-3F-4): All private streets constructed within the subdivision should comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. A separate application is required to be submitted for approval of private streets and should be submitted concurrently with the final plat application. 6. Subdivision Regulations (UDC 11-6): Compliance with the subdivision design and improvements standards listed in UDC 11-6C-3 is required. F. Services Analysis See Service Accessibility Report in Section VILB below. 1. Waterways(Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-6): All waterways, except natural waterways, are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space, in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 6. The Purdam Gulch Drain bisects this site and lies within an 85-foot wide easement and is proposed to be piped with development.A private drain exists along the west side of the property as depicted on the plat and should be piped with development. 2. Pressurized Irrigation(UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required to be provided in each development as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15. 3. Storm Drainage (UDC 11-3A-18): An adequate storm drainage system is required in accord with the adopted standards, specifications and ordinances; design and construction shall follow Best Management Practice as adopted by the City per UDC 11-3A-18. 4. Utilities (Comp Plan, UDC 11-3A-21): All utilities for the proposed development are required to be installed in accord with the City of Meridian I Department Report standards listed in UDC 11-3A-21. Water service will be provided to this property via extension of main lines in Ten Mile Rd.; main lines are required to be extended to and through the subject property with development. The developer should coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Dept. and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. Sanitary sewer service will be provided via extension of main lines located near the Purdam Drain on the northeast side of the subject property; main lines are required to be extended to and through the subject property with development. The developer should coordinate main size and routing with the Public Works Dept. and execute standard forms of easements for any mains that are required to provide service. IV. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS&CONDITIONS Staff recommends approval of the PP application but is not in support of the proposed MDA,CPAM and RZ due to the proposed development plan not being consistent with the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP for the proposed FLUM designations as discussed above in Section III. If City Council is in favor of the proposed development plan, Staff suggests changes to the FLUM and associated zoning to coincide with the proposed plan(i.e.Area 1 —MHDR FLUM designation with R-15 zoning; Areas 2&3—Commercial FLUM designation with C-G zoning) and the following development agreement provisions and conditions of approval: If Council is not in favor of the proposed development plan,Staff recommends denial of the MDA, CPAM and RZ applications and striking the following DA provisions and conditions A. Meridian Planning Division 1. A new Development Agreement(DA) shall be required as a provision of the MDA and RZ applications. The previous DA's [i.e. Fedrizzi Ten Mile LLC(Inst. #112073618),Janicek Properties Ten Mile(Inst. #112073616), SJJV,LLC(Inst. #112073617),The 10 at Meridian (DA Inst. #2021-132704);Vanguard Village(Inst.#2022-0497991 shall no longer be in effect for the subject property. Prior to approval of the rezone ordinance,a DA shall be entered into between the City of Meridian,the property owner at the time of rezone ordinance adoption, and the developer. A final plat application shall not be submitted until the rezone is finalized. The DA shall be signed by the property owner and returned to the Planning Division within six(6)months of the date of City Council approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision &Order for the Rezone and DA amendment request. The new DA shall incorporate the following provisions: i. Future development of the subject property shall be generally consistent with the conceptual development plan,use area plan,mobility plan,preliminary plat and landscape plan included below in Section VI and the standards in the Unified Development Code(UDC). ii. Future development of Area 1, as depicted on the Use Area Plan in Section VI.H, shall be consistent with the development guidelines of the Medium High Density Residential Future Land Use Map designation in the TMISAP. iii. Future development of Areas 2 and 3,as depicted on the Use Area Plan in Section VI.H, shall be consistent with the Commercial Future Land Use Map designation in the Comprehensive Plan. iv. Future development shall be consistent with the Project Design Standards submitted by the Applicant and approved with this application, included herein. These standards shall City of Meridian I Department Report supersede the design standards in the Architectural Standards Manual and the design guidelines in the TMISAP. These standards shall not allow deviations to UDC standards. v. A collector roadway system shall be constructed on the subject property in accord with Ada County Highway District's Master Street Map and in accord with Street Section Map in the TMISAP as recommended by Staff, as follows: Villagio/Grand Mogul shall be constructed from Ten Mile to the roundabout in accord with Street Section B as a typical 4-lane parkway and west of the roundabout with Street Section C as a major collector street; Cobalt and Umbria Hills shall be constructed in accord with Street Section D as a residential collector street; and Navigator shall be constructed in accord with Street Section C as a major collector street in accord with the associated diagrams in the TMISAP,with the exception that 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways shall be required in lieu of on-street bike lanes and on-street parking may be provided in areas not indicated for such where buildings are close to the street and parking is warranted,unless otherwise approved by ACHD. vi. The subject property shall be subdivided prior to issuance of any Certificates of Occupancies within the development. vii. A 10-foot wide multi-use pathway shall be constructed along the Purdam Drain(or drain alignment)in accord with the Pathways Master Plan and shall connect to the existing pathway to the north in Baraya Subdivision.A 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the pathway. viii.Ten(10)foot wide detached sidewalk/pathway shall be constructed along both sides of all collector streets(i.e. W. Cobalt Dr., S.Umbria Hills Ave.,W. Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Navigator Dr. and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way)within the site and adjacent to the west boundary of the site in lieu of on-street bike lanes; and within the street buffer along 1-84.A public use easement shall be submitted to the City for any portion of the sidewalks/pathways that lie outside of the public right-of-way. ix. Public art in a high quality of design shall be provided in shared spaces and incorporated into the design of streetscapes as set forth in the TMISAP (see pg. 3-47). The Applicant shall submit a plan depicting general locations of public art along with examples of the art proposed with the final plat application. 2. The final plat shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 35-foot wide street buffer along S. Ten Mile Rd., an entryway corridor; 20-foot wide street buffers along all collector streets(i.e.W. Cobalt Dr.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S. Umbria Hills Ave., S.Navigator Dr., and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way); and a 50-foot wide buffer along 1-84 in common lots or on a permanent dedicated buffer easement,maintained by the property owner,homeowner's association or business owner's association. ii. Depict street sections in accord with the Street Section Map in the TMISAP as required in the development agreement. iii. Depict 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways along both sides of all collector streets (i.e.W. Cobalt Dr., S.Umbria Hills Ave.,W. Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Navigator Dr., and S. Sunset Point Way) and within the street buffer along I-84. iv. Depict public pedestrian easements for any portion of the detached sidewalks/multi-use pathways along the collector streets that are outside the public right-of-way and recorded City of Meridian I Department Report instrument numbers of the easement where a separate easement is required by the Park's Dept. 3. The landscape plan shall include the following revisions: i. Depict a 35-foot wide street buffer along S. Ten Mile Rd., an entryway corridor; 20-foot wide street buffers along all collector streets(i.e.W. Cobalt Dr.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Umbria Hills Ave., S.Navigator Dr.,and the off-site S. Sunset Point Way); and a 50-foot wide buffer along I-84. ii. Depict landscaping within all street buffers in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B-7C. Additional landscape design features are required along entryway corridors (i.e. S. Ten Mile Rd.). iii. Depict 10-foot wide detached sidewalks/pathways along both sides of all collector streets (i.e. W. Cobalt Dr., S.Umbria Hills Ave.,W.Villagio Way/Grand Mogul, S.Navigator Dr. and S. Sunset Point Way)and within the street buffer along 1-84. iv. Depict landscaping along all pathways in accord with the standards listed in UDC 11-3B- 12C. 4. Prior to submittal of the final plat for City Engineer signature, a 14-foot wide public pedestrian easement shall be submitted to the Planning Division,approved by City Council and recorded for the multi-use pathway along the Purdam Drain(or drain alignment) and any other pathways required by the Park's Department in accord with the Pathways Master Plan that are outside of public right-of-way. 5. All private streets constructed within the subdivision shall comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3F-4. A separate application is required to be submitted for approval of private streets and should be submitted concurrently with the final plat application. 6. All waterways, except natural waterways,are required to be piped unless used as a water amenity or linear open space,in which case they may be left open as set forth in UDC 11-3A- 6. 7. Permanent addresses cannot be assigned until Ada County has approved the proposed street names. 8. Approval of the preliminary plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat. Upon written request and filing by the applicant prior to the termination of the period,the director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the city engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted.With all extensions,the director or City Council may require the preliminary plat. combined preliminary and final plat or short plat to coWly with the current provisions of this title. 9. Staff's failure to cite all relevant UDC requirements does not relieve the Applicant from compliance. Other Agency comments maybe accessed in the project ale included in the public record. City of Meridian I Department Report V. FINDINGS A. Rezone(UDC 11-513-3E) Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings: 1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan; The Commission finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff if Council deems the proposed development plan appropriate, complies with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district, specifically the purpose statement; The Commission finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff if Council deems the proposed development plan appropriate, complies with the regulations outlines for the proposed districts. 3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety,and welfare; The Commission finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff if Council deems the proposed development plan appropriate, should not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to, school districts; and The Commission finds the alternate map amendment, as suggested by Staff if Council deems the proposed development plan appropriate, should not result in an adverse impact on the delivery of services by any political subdivision providing public services within the City including, but not limited to, school districts. 5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city. This finding is not applicable as the proposed request is for a rezone, not annexation. B. Comprehensive Plan(UDC 11-511-71)) Upon recommendation from the Commission,the Council shall make a full investigation and shall, at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant a amendment to the Comprehensive Plan,the Council shall make the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the other elements of the comprehensive plan. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council, is consistent with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment provides an improved guide to future growth and development of the city. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council,provides an improved guide to future growth and development in the City. 3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of City of Meridian I Department Report the Comprehensive Plan. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council, is consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Unified Development Code. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council, is consistent with the Unified Development Code within the conditions listed herein. 5. The amendment will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council, will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses if approved by City Council. 6. The proposed amendment will not burden existing and planned service capabilities. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council, will not burden existing and planned service capabilities in this portion of the city. Sewer and water services are available to be extended to this site. 7. The proposed map amendment(as applicable)provides a logical juxtaposition of uses that allows sufficient area to mitigate any anticipated impact associated with the development of the area. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council,provides a logical juxtaposition of uses and sufficient area to mitigate any development impacts to adjacent properties. 8. The proposed amendment is in the best interest of the City of Meridian. The Commission finds the alternate amendment suggested by Staff that's consistent with the proposed development plan, if approved by Council, is in the best interest of the City. C. Preliminary Plat(UDC 11-6B-6) In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: In consideration of a preliminary plat,the decision-making body shall make the following findings: 1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified development code; The Commission finds if City Council approves the proposed development plan and alternate FL UM designations suggested by Staff with the conditions contained herein, the preliminary plat will be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the UDC. 2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed development; The Commission finds public services are available to the site and will be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. 3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's City of Meridian I Department Report capital improvement program; The Commission finds there are no scheduled public improvements adjacent to or on this site. 4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; The Commission finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and The Commission finds the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. The Commission is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be preserved with this development. City of Meridian I Department Report VI. ACTION A. Staff: Staff is not in support of the proposed map amendment and associated rezone based on the conceptual development plan proposed as it doesn't meet the minimum development guidelines in the TMISAP nor does it provide the mix of integrated uses desired in Mixed Use designated areas or the intensity and/or types of uses desired in the MU-Com and HDE designated areas. If Council is of the opinion the proposed development plan is more appropriate for this area than that envisioned in the adopted TMISAP, Staff suggests alternate FLUM designations and zoning are approved consistent with the proposed development plan,as follows:MHDR and R-15 zoning for the property in Area 1; and Commercial and C-G zoning in Areas 2 and 3 (see second adopted vs. proposed FLUM exhibit in Section VII.C). B. Commission: The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on August 15,2024. At the public hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject CPAM,MDA,RZ and PP requests. I. Summary of Commission public hearing_ a. hi favor: Tonn Peterson,Ball Ventures Ahlquist; Geoff Wardle,Clark Wardle, Colin Ronhaar,Ardurra; Elizabeth Allen,Ball Ventures Ahlquist—Applicant and Representatives b. In opposition:None c. Commenting: JerLny Defrates d. Written testimony: Kristina Bolt; Geoff Wardle,Clark Wardle(Applicant's Representative) e. Staff presenting,application: Sonya Allen f Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons 2. Key issue(s) public testimony a. Concern that the proposed development will increase the traffic gridlock on Ten Mile, Franklin&1-84. b. Desire for preservation of the existing(cedar?)tree along Ten Mile Rd. and any othe trees on the site. c. In support of the services and shopping opportunities proposed within the development. d. Against the proposed development. 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission: a. Agreement with Staff that the proposed development plan is not consistent with the TMISAP. b. Concurrence that the TMISAP being 17 years old may be outdated and there may be a need to refresh it to reflect current conditions. c. General agreement that the proposed development plan is appropriate for this area and supports Staff s suggested path forward with FLUM designations and zoning districts. 4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation: a. Recommend approval to Council with the additional recommendation that Council consider if the proposed FLUM designations&zoning are consistent with the proposed development plan and whether those need to be modified. 5. Outstandingissue(s)for City Council: A. Staff requested the Applicant submit a phasing plan for the overall development to understand the timing of infrastructure improvements—the Applicant has declined to do SO. City of Meridian I Department Report VI.Action C. City Council: The Meridian City Council heard these items on(continued from: September 10,2024) September 17. 2024 and continued the project to September 24.2024. 1. Summary of the City Council public hearing: a. In favor: Geoff Wardle,Clark Wardle b. In opposition:None c. Commentiny: Gina Johnson,Kristina Bolt,Karla Ehlers,Ryan Manwaring,Katie Manwaring d. Written testimony: Several letters of testimony have been received(see public recordl e. Staff presenting application: Sonya Allen f. Other Staff commenting on application:None 2. Key issue(s) of public testimony: a. Request for the developer and the City to consider an alternate development plan for this area that would benefit charities: b. Concern what the proposed development will do to this area,no need for more multi-family in this area—the City already has The Village, consider the neighborhoods in this area: c. Against more high-density apartments in this area,concern pertainingtpacity of area schools: cL Concern about lagging infrastructure in this area,quality of education for our kids. healthcare issues- 3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council: a. None 4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation. a. None VII. EXHIBITS A. Project Area Maps Note:Because the subject property has not yet been subdivided, the following maps depict the parcel as it exists today; however, a portion of the parcel at the southwest corner of the site is not a part of this application. (link to Project Overview) City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits 1. Aerial ... lam. •�,�..a_-- � —— — 1 — I � _�, � Legend Project Location _ Area of Impact OAnalysis is 2. Zoning Map R-15 4N R1 M-E T C-N I-L Ml RUT C2 RUT n R-40 I TN-R R-15 TN-C TN-C f-L C-C C-G Legend R-8` O Project Location Area of Impact H-E R1 OAnalysis I RR �R1 M-E RUT TN-R LSO R-15 City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits - AI - Ulr11 L.I�UJ�I�°1J • e �" Z W �- FR�ANKL-INN � • • .IAl1A a== r AID� illl=-7 ko H -• • __ 'NA lul a m � 111 -01/ERL'-AND -� - • ■■■ - NII\\\\11�=111�IIIInnuu1111nA1111 r.�_ W �� lelr �� '�' /nArlrQ • Illlna� ■ III 167♦ L+-IIJIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. 'INIII4,i,�.��_ _� is r M■�r■ .r nu FRANKL-IN - �� ��■���,■ Illr IIIIIIIIIIIIIJIIIiIllllillll I ��. �umur=��m �S ■ Wit. �� 7�IpAJ���. .i" mi. :♦�uulll=_r=a ������ � �� \� Q fluBnArrmrl, i IAs= IWA; l ��+illllll IIIIIII 1 V_IIIPIIIIIIIIIIlI��' � �I�r_ '�:� Qc IIIIIIIp111111111=- m1 -1111111111111111111�== _h11111111111111J 1111111 :.:.� :�'� ■1 - - . I � ■■ � � ' ■i� r�■II����IIIIIIII I . -. . .. ��� .>, _ - . _—� � *�11�■lam IIIIIIII i �►�■■it��■ �� I� OYER�AND =■� l�� ��� B. Service Accessibility Report PARCEL S1215131401 SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY Overall Score: 29 32nd Percentile Description Location In City Limits GREEN Extension Sewer Trunkshed mains e 500 ft.from parcel GREEN Floodplain Either not within the 100 yrfloodplain or> 2 acres GREEN Emergency Services Fire Response time > 9 min. RED Emergency Services Police Meets response time goals most of the time GREEN Pathways Within 1f4 mile of current pathways GREEN Transit Within 1f4 mile of future transit route YELL0%N Arterial Road Buildout Status Ultimate configuration (#of lanes in master street= GREEN plan) matches existing(#of lanes) School Walking Proximity Within 112 mile walking GREEN Either a High School or College within 2 miles OR a School Drivability Middle or Elementary School within 1 mile driving GREEN (existing or future) Park Walkability No park within walking distance by park type 'RED City of Meridian I Department Report VII. Exhibits C. Future Land Use Map—Adopted vs.Proposed Applicant Proposed: 0 500 1.000 Date:7/22/2024 Feet Adopted Future Land Uses r(NON FRANKIIN iIMN 1 a 11 rk PSI So, OIj i� WOO � ar ion��� - • III � II.1 ► 1 I Area of Change Applicant Proposed Proposed Future land Uses OPM, ��� StaifiCleanup -- —FRANKLIN i •I II 1I V •• Zi� •l r ti. 1 1 /IIIaw rAw lmzyyl+ti�•, en High D Mal 0 'I I I City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits Staff Recommended(if Council Approves Proposed Development Plan): 0 500 1,000 Date:8/12M24 nnmw::::�Feet Adopted Future Lana lases ----FRANKLIN---- •.•� kv F. - I f i�I . Q W:� } i JIJ�J Hig Q •�� 1 Wr Fri I Density Ii 1 li I I ai '.. -J w� /� Area of Change StaFf Aftemative to Apolicaton Proposed Future Land Uses l..4 — — —— — --- ■..a Staff Cleanup '0J --FRANKLIN-- �I ,d r. � ii �Lk lar r. I� t ffMIR r fi :iliwv 00 Op ''7SJ 1• I ••` y4* 7 IP �_. City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits D. Rezone Legal Descriptions&Exhibit Maps C-C I TN-C I Z 1 k ...... �3 w 1 i-. -'r �417 fC�LTiCi GRiI Fn C-Gia 184 — City of Meridian Department Report VII. Exhibits /,, ARDURRA Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE TN-C DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the SWI/4 of the NE114 of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian, City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northeast one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the north boundary of said SW1{4 of the NE1I4, A. N.89°15'15"W.,21.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence leaving said north boundary, 1. S.00°44'48"W.,60.36 feet;thence, 2. 5.14°46'461N.,96.99 feet:thence, 3. 5.28058'46'"W.,589.66 feet;thence, 4. 5.04°43'51"E.,297.25 feet;thence, 5. 5.46031'04'W.,77.20 feet;thence, 6. S.04°54'04"E.,279.57 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 7. Westerly along said curve to the right having a radius of 2000.00 feet,an arc length of 130.48 feet,through a central angle of 3°44'17",of which the long chord bears S.88°53'09"W.,130A6 feet to the south boundary of said SW 114 of the NE114:thence,along said boundary,tangent from said curve, B. N.89014'39"W.,15.40 feet,thence, leaving said boundary, 9. N.00°45'22"E.,67.95 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve,thence, 10.Northerly along said curve to the right having a radius of 914.00 feet,an arc length of 615.97 feet,through a central angle of 38°3648",of which the long chord bears N.04°48�03"W.,604.38 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 11.Northerly along said curve to the left having a radius of 1450.00 feet,an arc length of 580.02 feet,through a central angle of 22°55'09",of which the long chord bears N.01°3971"E.,576.16 feet;thence, non-tangent from said curve, 12.N.001,12'10"W.,83.53 feet to said north boundary,thence,along said boundary, kL CA)V 13.S.89°15'15"E.,450.78 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 7.48 Ac. 13765 °µN�° r 332 N.BroodmGm Way I Numpq,ID 8368J 1 208.442.6360 1 www.uFdurro.com EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE TN-C LOCATED IN THE SWI14 OF THE NE114 OF SECTION 15, 0 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO if 2024 21,07' y POINT OF CN1116 N89'15'15"W 1320.78' BEGINNING NE1116 848.92 _ 0 a w 62 a ZONE TN- ! S V Inn• 200' 100' 7.48 AC � � I o I � ;o (TN-0)Go to N AN A Q w m r)LL � � o o cn [n � a 1 I LAB �{�f�f�J�. � �5 CL 13765 wa 'p 0 i� a a ff C114 U6.41' CE1116 r 589'14'39'E 1321.43' Li 250:39'�-9d4111G i CCA-4�rg z -- a //�/ ARDURRA i� q 332 N.6ROAOMORE WAY NAMPA,IDAHO 83887 LJ 20&-dd2#300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM l/ ARDURRA Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-C DESCRIPTION A parcel of land being all of Lot.2 Block 2 of Outer Banks Subdivision,recorded in Book 126 of Plats at Pages 20200-20205, records of Ada County, Idaho,located in the NE1J4 of the NE1{4 of Section 15, Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the north one-sixteenth corner common to Sections 14& 15,thence,along the south boundary of said NE1f4 of the NE1f4, A. N.89°14'59"W.,81.87 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence,continuing, 1. N.89°14'59"W.,358.84 feet; thence,leaving said north boundary, 2. N.59°25'50"E.,162.82 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 3. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 263.00 feet,an arc length of 117.45 feet,through a central angle of 25'35'17",of which the long chard bears N.72'13'2811E. 116.48 feet to a curve;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 4. 5.59031'25"E.,110.35 feet;thence, 5. 5.03°39'59" ., 57.05 feet; thence, d. 5.86°20'01"E.,17.00 feet;thence, 7. 5.03°39'35"W.,9.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.62 Ac. a. 13765 0 F 'MP-� 332 N.Bfaadmare Way Nompo,ID 83687 1 208.442.6300 WWW.Wdumo.com EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE C-C LOCATED IN THE NE114 OF THE NE114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST. BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2024 A 0' S0 im 2M ZONE � CrC 0.6 AC NE1116 �aa.sa N1116 N89-14'59'W 1321,21' 15,914 POINT OF {C BEGINNING m 31- UL o 0 ;}z m C E V 115 S89'15'03'E 1321.73' A4 L A k� AL 13765 Of OVA- ARDURRA 332 N.BROAD MORE WAY } NAM PA,IDAHO836a7 208- 42-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM RDURR Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-C DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE114 of the SE1l4 of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the one-quarter corner common to Sections 14& 15;thence,along the east boundary of said NE114 of the SE114, A, 5.00°30'02"W.,278.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence,continuing 1. 5.00°30'02"W.,606.98 feet,thence, 2. N.89°16'04" .,880.37 feet;thence, 3. N.00°43'56"E.,442.18 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 4. Northerly along said curve to the right having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 103.87 feet,through a central angle of 29°45'21",of which the long chord bears N.15°36'37"E., 102.70 feet to a point of reverse curve;thence, 5. Northerly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 103.87 feet, through a central angle of 29°45'21",of which the long chord bears N.15°36'37"E., 102.70 feet; thence,tangent from said curve, & N.00°43'56"E.9 83.67 feet;thence, T S.87°57'20"E,30.11 feet,thence, B. S.DO'W'00"E.,107.18 feet;thence, 9. S.88°34'44"E.,793.76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 12.34 At. wk LAB EN 4 375 •T jk46 � 332 N.Broodmore Way f.3npa,0 83687 208.442.6300 1 WWW.ardurra.com EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE C-C LOCATED IN THE NE1l4 OF THE SE114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN.ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2024 E2 CE11113 $8915'05-E 1321.73' n — — — 15 94 o POINT OF BEGINNING Ex! ca s I o � I (H-E) o ZONE r 12.34 AC (mix W LU W m o 0 LL (H-E) � w o � w it ¢ v u7 0 S89'13'37E 1.322.88- SE1116 - - - — 1514 W S1116 L9_ L e 4r ' } 291�39u-%P.dOYIXG_3_IimC�,dg $'�6iQ� 230�79 13765 If of =14.BROADMORE WAY NAMPA,IDAHO 83687 208442-6300 1 WWWARDURRA.COM ARDURR Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 2 ZONE WE DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1{4 of the SE1/4,the NW114 of the 5E114,the SW114 of the NE1l4 and the SE114 of the NE1/4 of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center one-quarter corner of Section 15;thence,along the north boundary of said NW1l4 of the SE1l4, A. S.89"14'39"E., 721.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING,thence,continuing, 1. S.89"14'39"E., 190.81 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 2. Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 2000.00 feet,an arc length of 304.36 feet,through a central angle of 8°43'10",of which the long chord hears N.86°23'38"E., 304.07 feet to a curve; thence, 3. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 1500.00 feet,an arc length of 145.02 feet,through a central angle of 5°32'22",of which the long chord bears N.84°48'23"E., 144.96 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 4. N.87°34'33"E.,9.81 feet;thence, 5. 5.00°4512"W., 199,38 feet;thence 6. S.89019'13"E.,411.44 feet to the heginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 7. Southwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 221.22 feet,an arc length of 160.92 feet,through a central angle of 41°40'42",of which the long chord bears 5.69°45'07"W 157.40 feet;thence,tangent frorn said curve, 8. S.49°45'00" .,229.53 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve:thence, 9. Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 247.12 feet.an arc length of 148.00 feet,through a central angle of 34°18'48",of which the Iong chard bears 5.71°09'48"UV., 145.80 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 10. S.00"33'00"W., 124.95 feet;thence, 11. N.89"14'39"W., 579.54 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 12. Northwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 93.52 feet,through a central angle of 2V4732",of which the Iong chard bears N.12°47'04"W.,92,67 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 332 H.Broad more Wary I Nampo,I 83687 1 208.442.6300 1 www.ardurro.corn Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 2 of 2 13. N.00°36'43"E.,450.89 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 9.13 Ac. 1 765 7 ,Q OF .� O l V, 2 332 N.8r nod more Way Nampo,D 83687 208.442.4300 www.ordurro.com EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE WE EZ LOCATED IN THE NE114 OF THE SE114,THE NW114 OF THE SE114, THE SW1l4 OF THE NE114,AND Trig SE114 OF THE NE114 OF SECTION 15,TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISE MERIDIAN. CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2024 C3 0' 100, 200' 400' 0 NE1116 a V a cn O � ti w � X POINT OF (TN-G) BEGINNING (G ) —_ C114 589'14'39"E 1321,43' c! S89'15'05% 1321.73' _ 721.00' GE1116 BASIS OF BEARINGS 15 14 L� Ld V GO O Y r ZONE a H-E PC) s.13 AG 0 x 0 (H-E) LO w � w � o n ;'7 .d pL LANDS z } SE1116 v GCSµ 29P'391xF 951kG; U-q 6 SYEit ?]h7:H m of /��/ ARDURRA 332 N.BROAD MORE WAY NAMPA.IDAHO 83687 206- 42-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM RDVR Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-G DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NW1l4 of the 5E1I4 and the NE1/4 of the SW1l4 of Section 15, Township 3 North,Range 1 West, Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the center one-quarter corner of Section 15;thence,along the north boundary of said NW114 of the SE114, 1. S.89014'39"E., 721.00 feet;thence,leaving said north boundary, 2. S.00°36'43"W.,450.89 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 3. Southeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 93.52 feet,through a central angle of 26°47'32",of which the long chord bears 5.12°47'04"E,,92.67 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 4. N.89°14'39"W.,309.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence. 5. Southwesterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 244.64 feet,through a central angle of 14°01'00°,of which the long chard bears 5.83°44'51"W., 244.03 feet,thence,non-tangent from said curve, 6. N.39°31'08"W., 748.08 feet to the north boundary of said NW114 of the SEIM;thence,along said boundary, 7. 5.89°14'48"E.,291.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 9,82 Ac, 4 6� Or 13765 332 N,Broadmore Woy Nompo,ID 83687 208.442.6300 1 www,orduric.com EXHIBIT S KETCH . ZONE C.G § LOCATED IN THE NW114 OFF E SE114 AND THE NE1 k OF THE SWIM OF SECTION1% § TOWNS HIP3 NO RTH, RANGE 1 WEST,BOISEMERIDm%CITY OF N ERI DIAN,ADACOUNTYJD O § mm A § N@' 1E« 13 a ad NE t1e 22 § \_ § � � 7POINT OF / BEGINNING A m C1& EN- g@ 4'ms1J2 .43 § k1- 4 § ma43 GE£1 % I § 3ZONE E B ( -C) 982* 2 (M7) * � 3 I W| k $ /I q � t G \I � y § / k ! ,2 ' ' k £ ( BASIS OFBEA�NrGS if cS£18 N&;2y�■ SE111 ( § L�%� m & 6 \ 13765 A R D UR R A \ or ` 'k § 0 1m0- aN-mmmmE ¥ NAMPA,IkHO 83687 442-63001 ■WW.AR»RPA. M Project No.230739 Date. May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE WE DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1l4 of the SWI/4 and the NW114 of the SE114 of Section 15, Township 3 North,Range I West, Boise Meridian.City of Meridian,Ada County. Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center south one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the west boundary of said NIN1{4 of the SE1{4, A. N.00°37'23"E.,570.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence, 1. N.89°49'30"W.,65.26 feet;thence, 2. N.87°57'46"W., 195.19 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence,. 3. Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet,an arc length of 70.03 feet through a central angle of 5°21'01",of which the long chord bears N.68°46'35"E., 70.01 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 4. N.66°06'05"E.,231.67 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve; thence. 5. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 185.66 feet,through a central angle of 10'38'16",of which the Iong chard bears N.71'25'13"E,, 185.40 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 6. S.39°31'08"E.,241.72 feet;thence, 7. N.89°49'30"W.,346.28 feet to the POI NT0F BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 1.37 Ac. 13765 0 F 0'mA 332 N.Broadmare Way I Nampa,0 83&8J 208.442.6300 www.ardurro.corn EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE WE LOCATED IN THE NE114 OF THE SW14 AND THE NW114 OF THE SE114 OF SECTION 16, 6 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY,IDAHO 2024 a _ CE1f15 N$g'14'39"W 1321.43 4 m r � LA � IL] W iV M1 2 (H E) (C-C) Eli 1.37 AC cl POINT OF (H-E) z BEGINNING w I 4 H O O Y u 100' 200' 400' adr 4 CS1116 BASIS OF BEARINGS SE111B uu IV8$`13'31"W 1323-1 S y ypL LAkU � 5r 73�39X�9NING N f4E�lJ�drg - - . 13765 T£ Of o'm h � 332 N.BROAD MORE WAY y NAMPA.IDANO83W tiJ 208-442-6300 1 WV W.ARDURRA.COM Project No:230739 Date: May 16,2024 Page 1 of 1 ZONE C-G DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1l4 of the SW114 of Section 15,Township 3 North, Range 1 West. Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center south one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the east boundary of said NE1f4 of the SW114, A. N.00°37"23"E.,574.32 feet.thence,leaving said west boundary, B. N.89022"37"W.,260.40 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve and the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence, 1. Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 750.00 feet,an art length of 252.69 feet,through a central angle of 19'1&16",of which the long chord bears S.81°06'13"W., 251.50 feet,thence,tangent from said curve, 2. N.89°14'39'W, 51.86 feet;thence, 3. N.00°44'31"E.,41.94 feet;thence, 4. S.89°17'19"E.,299.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.21 Ac. ge �" r 13765 tiM1 Iq4 p'lrl�+ - 332 N.Broadmore Wary Narnpo,ID 03687 248.442.6300 I www.ardurro.corn EXHIBIT SKETCH - ZONE C-G LOCATED IN THE NEIf4 OF THE SW114 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH. RANGE 1 WEST, BOISE MERIDIAN,CITY OF MERIDIAN,ADA COUNTY, IDAHO 2024 a m 581'14'3B.E 1322.75' 1 1 FJ S89'14'48"E 1322,78' C 1�4 �� — a Fk a 4 0' S4' 104' 2W o � � r O N � NS iy pq w W U a (M-E) `+ fl a Z O ci m 2 Nag 22'37"W 26U.40- El LZCOINF/ // n.21 Ac/ POINT OF BEGINNING (N-E) w % O M. 51116 — — — BASIS OF BEARINGS CS1!16 = N69'14'03'w 2647.96' — — ❑ pL LA NO 95 L 13765 IRDURR OF 332 N.BROADMORE WAY O'MAV r[- NAMPA.ICAHO8368T LJ 208-442-6300 1 WWW.ARDURRA.COM I"rV\ DURR Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 2 ZONE C-G DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the NE1I4 of the SW1{4 and the NW114 of the SEIM of Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County, Idaho,more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the center south one-sixteenth corner of Section 15;thence,along the east boundary of said NE1l4 of the SW1l4, A N.00°37'23"E.,77.72 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence,leaving said east boundary, 1. N.84°05'20"W.,208.50 feet;thence, 2. N.84"22'21"W., 139.20 feet;thence, 3. N.81"25'39"W.,216.99 feet;thence, 4. N.00"45'17"E.,393.76 feet;thence, 5. S.8 9a 14'39"E.,5 1.8 6 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 6. Northeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 750.00 feet,an arc length of 252.69 feet, through a central angle of 19°18'16".of which the long chord bears N.81°06'13"E.,251.50 feet;thence, non-tangent from said curve, 7. 5.89013'33"E.,606.67 feet;thence, 8. N.39°31'08'"W.,241.72 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 9. Northeasterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 1000.00 feet,an arc length of 244.64 feet,through a central angle of 14°01'00",of which the long chord bears N.83°44'51"E., 244.03 feet;thence,tangent from said curve, 10.S.89014'39"E.,309.87 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve;thence, 11.Southeasterly along said curve to the left having a radius of 200.00 feet,an arc length of 50.49 feet,through a central angle of 14°2748",of which the long chord bears S.33°24'43"E.,50.35 feet;thence,non-tangent from said curve, 12.S.50a34'i 9"W.,15 7.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 13.Southwesterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 301.72 Feet,an arc length of 222.21 feet,through a central angle of 42°11'50",of which the long chord bears S.71°43'54"W., 217.22 feet;thence, non-tangent from said curve, 332 N.Broadmora Way I Nampa,0 8368J 1 208.442.6300 1 www.ardurra_eom Project No.230789 Date:July 11,2024 Page 2of2 14.5.39°31'08"E.,721.50 feet;thence, 15.N.86°48'58" .,573.95 feet;thence, 16.N.84°05'20"W,,337.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 15.94 At. 0L LA o t� 13765 Of O p M A 2 332 N_Broodmora Way Nampo,0 83687 I 208.442.63DO www.ordUFro.com § g >l' oySCGa o ) < / LL § � § Lu / ) LJ /\ ce `` § \ | { fa 2 i 2 j) ( � § 3 ] § H # / 0 t % U) f / h < / \ \ co w I �� 8 L _ LU oD � $ \ N w A ) , LU 22 j & 2 T § m 9 § y % / � / � / LU 2 o k § � q § Z & ƒTZ % w § LU 7 b ] w � $� n § } aq § $ 0 ) / LU- L k M § 7 ¥� §|m 0 t 2 e w ± § 2 ( © ;W' L ±»��N E. New Development Agreement Boundary—Legal Description & Exhibit Map ARDURRA Project No:230739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 1 of 2 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the 5112 of the NE114,the N112 of the SE114,and the NE114 of the SW 114 of Section 15,Township 3 North,Range 1 West,Boise Meridian,City of Meridian,Ada County,Idaho, mare particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the center north one-sixteenth corner of said Section 14,thence,along the north boundary of said 5112 of the NE114, 1_ 5.89°1515'E_,1320.76 feet to the northeast one-sixteenth corner of said Section 15,thence, continuing, 2_ 5.89°14'59'E_,880.50 feet to the south right-of-way of Cobalt drive;thence,leaving along said right-of-way the following courses: 3_ N.5902550"E.,162.82 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve;thence, 4_ Easterly along said curve to the right having a radius of 263_00 feet,an arc length of 117.45 feet, through a central angle of 25135'16',of which the long chord bears N_72113'28"E_,116.48 feet, thence,non-tangent from said curve, 5_ 5.60°24'53'E_,88.51 feet;thence, 6_ 5.55°54'35'E_,21.M feet;thence, 7_ S_03°39'59'W_,57.05 feet'thence, S_ S.&6D2901'E_,16_90 feet to the west right-of-way of S.Ten Mile Road;thence,along said right- of-way the following courses: 9. S.03°39'35' .,670.74 feet;thence, 10.5.10°44'07' .,96.98 feet;thence, 11.5.43°06'22' .,84.65 feet;thence, 12.5.06°21'28' .,207.42 feet;thence, 13_S_01D25'18'W_,559.90feet-,thence, 14.5.01°25'16' .,57.7D feet;thence, 15.5_0402957'W_,550.74 feet;thence, 16.5.04°20'S7' .,34.63 feet;thence, 332 N_8roodmore Way ' Nomp4 083687 , 2U8.442.6300 l www.ordurro_com Project No: 23D739 Date:July 11,2024 Page 2of2 17_S_15°01'39'W_, 99.2D feet to the north right-of-way of the westbound Interstate 84 on ramp; thence,along said right-of-way the following courses: 18_S_47°33'D4'W_, 109_D9 feet;thence, 19_S_66°54'29'W_, 105.73 feet;thence, 20_S_80°09'20'W_, 150.16 feet;thence, 21_S_76DO1'12'W_,330.69 feet;thence, 22_S_79°54'25'W_, 177.77 feet;thence, 23_S_84°46'37'W_, 162.75 feet;thence, 24_S_88°47'D4'W_, 108.25 feet;thence, 25.5.88°46 59'W_,3 12.10 feet to the north right-of-way of Interstate 84; thence,along said right- of-way the following courses: 26_ N_86048'58"W_, 675.49 feet; thence_ 27_ N_84005'20"W_, 546.27 feet; thence_ 28_ N_84022'21"W_, 139.20 feet; thence.- 2 9- N_81025'89"W_, 216.99 feet; thence_ leaving said right-of-way, 30_ N_O(r45'12"E_, 1190.89 feet to the north boundary of said NE114 of the SW 114; thence,along said boundary, 31_S_89°14'48"E_, 558.49 feet to center one-quarter corner of said Section 15;thence along the west boundary of said S112 of the NElf4; 32 N_00°36'37"E_, 1328.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING_ CONTAINING: 163.67 Acres pit L 137 U% f ION0 Ir of 332 N.Broadrnore Way hrmrir;ID 83687 208_442.6300 wwwxrdUFro_wm . LO f Ud ■ � K / cH3im &]IS \ \ k 2 Z � 5L'65T�� ,E'g & er+ -2 § z & m / j I) ,\ g 2 § | \ I\ I o j | _ 7 )�o areJ� ym,�£mN LU co � Lk222 - - - - -- 6 . @ LU & / \§E zi - R [ w ��§ ■ \g f k w it La | ) §z \ \ 2 a. 22 I&■ R § � 2 LL 2 i b 0Irl " w � \ z \ k a � w g RT%�zL£oDN i � z LU & m a 0 § x f - - - - I� I} 77 I\ ± § co � § ELL � z § E © k I e — } § § 8 \ § < n B U § ` Ui < § 2 � g F. Existing Conceptual Development Pa for Vanguard Village TEN MILE ROAD 2 | # . � � ■� e� � a ■� � sus, - a . . � e ■ .0 - .� , .46 : - � - . �- NmZTepoepwaa6ere oullaeaeaoa(i.eVnurd Village) R proposed mb included in then w Development A ee me 6 G. Proposed Overall Conceptual Development Plan r �a O £ J ................. n - 46 9.TEN MILE ROAD _ cN'EN.. ¢`oa 49 NM ................. —S S a s Z w 9 _ F- rx� e A!' Diu w f Vl .Mwir s..swiss.i. � ON. "q !�„�r+ � Ptifl,# _ *i__ E�"00, or x 0 S i' �.10��, i. 1, DO; Ld j W f Ld — Z W m X .... -- = S I I I I I ! I ' I H. Use Area Plan The image above shows three (3)areas that make up The District at Ten Mile Development based on the underlying zoning and future land use designation boundaries. AREA 1 accommodates a mix of multi-family residential uses such as townhomes and multifamily. AREA2 accommodates predominantly commercial mixed uses,including large format/anchor and specialty retail,casual and fine dining,entertainment,recreation, hospitality,childcare,and office uses. AREA 3 accommodates medium to higher-density office,commercial,recreation,medical,and hospitality uses. Vil' S ` � `' 46 % 40 A• !time J;r� 3+•• � 1,6 w 111116. _ www r►.� - EW •y°r: r I' t 7. o� •. Rr� �w ° wi- •• t�" °fit t# r .• r f � e..=ar=a• ........... • t t .i�iy. INTERSTATE B< 1. Preliminary Plat(date: 6/4/2024) viina v NOISIAKiens A11A N3113Ib1SIO 3H1 � I. ao�l�ndAavnuwnaad ����� 11 0--ri iL 9 e © `o% i otd � 3 0 LD ao Q _ W Fwo O OW �} s o .Wuj O f i W R /R A i W R R � a j _ o MW11 66w„00000_ � yy WWW6 899988 9999 k � 4 4 C� 9� 6 6 6 9 R � aap� §§6666�alisi m-- !9 llllll �IIIAWW � � s � � � R R A W r R r r W a o ® s W a aaiieinoadnuoiws ai ruanauvm nase�rwaa xauixm�dmasuwHnmsinuna�sai w ix�nrWucai euum nour.�iaiaarno asnaW'noiia�oonmaun mwrowdo.umdoadaxi ai nrnrvusni snu aA'dnoeFJvuanow uoe® _ mme I wan..cx ('V SNOISN3WIO 101 h �m eA vana Y NOISIAIflsns 31IW N311OIU1Slfl 3Hl �� �ao�l�ndAavNiwi�aad �`� � � lit I e s 5 } t y 1 lid ,,y ao ,� � s a !�•� :q , °' 1 l ,e I�" ® �9>affi � a� •W --� e I€ 3I o •� 11 �, JA „�II��•q � � !//��/ � � a� is �,m f� il9° / - \ J �� w lox a � SNO11038 13MUS N cMi 3 yea 'ef' van(MV NOISIAI(io 1S 3lIW N311ORi1S10 3H-L NOdlYnd),aVNiwn3ad z z z z z z z e � LD p ee Y d i e � Lj i B T a w a . F iyUj � r N p C i W d a Z U P N a 3 3 3 a s s s 8 Ll 3 3 3 3 U11SHMd 770Id18 SI tldtlnlO O NUIUMUd N3UIW OIl03deln1 1IM91N.L1 ul w L131VIY18NI elm O NoMilIQOW tldtlfmjo A dmtl 3H18I Aanm18N1 slH �I'dH01sW flO -.® mono± »2gHi { Ya nMV NaSAQBnS 311VY N3i 1 e1 e 3H [ R. 77 _ �� :,iaa*_me \ ) \ | } � {� .�, | � | � � | , � | ) Ll ( k § J. Site Plan(date: 6/5/2024) NHId 311S N ni m van( V NOISIAlcons 3_1IW N31 IO ISIG 3Hl �. �� aOd 1Vld IaVNIWll3ad 11n R go Iy C. 3fr u fiJ c r ILE [ [ I ` I v ------- ----` f u - la'iendl'anv i � NOAM�]OX]a'S 3 J @ III I / j � C f ¢ [ NHId 311E N cv van(AV NaIS1/1148f1S ��IW Nil l�I�IlSl4 3Hl � U :UOJ iVld ANVNIWIl3bd _ � s LF '- fanendlavoa aiiw++gls ._ .. y Jo u ,I ^ I l I � �"' a ��. ¢� Haag .• � � � 1 i _ s N M3aw Ndld 311E r ni vanaNY N©ISIAlaons El�IW N31 iDIHI51a 3H1 9 aoA avid AaVNiwn3ad lam em In YI U} n U 0A 11 a > >A r - � L • • I 3 � � -=_ 1 � j GLl1 •,i 1 I 1` I -- �g -------- �� + --------- III i K. Landscape Plan p a 9q � 'E E ' E g LU m 2 u o s > IX E o - 4 E c a E a g y F a a m $ o L @ 5 zi m w N V 8 z 5 a vVi n a v m o o c F w J L� w i m o s v E _ § ° O ° g a" n 0 5 fn a O 0 g Z w r I� r i.1 — • S.TEN MILE ROAD �+ Q i IF do � i L F �(• • q � F...F..� M i` � rb y 1 l s+ 4 12, e m j — (A at c j' - z ome I mia I I ' I N ass t J 1i� ................. w — _ -- Wad w a : IRY < rcY u y N 3 p fig. �;x � sp gm � a& o .,tea d ya ` $ + � u�s • ` � ................. J aa _ Q Q z V — z CL Wg S.TEN MILE ROA❑ W �'w* : s r a .. �%P s r : k s s ; : I m r ` W •2 r A :����t 'Ry �•, fIKiW�� 4 Ors^- f m I e' r-!s6 r I � I • c Z W .� H f ................. III �ic III I m>a I II ► Ili L. Open Space Exhibit q §rn oa ^� J #� Q �o LL m � N i w � aWN W � ¢ U Cmm i 0 a p a yW I N 0� J a a O All ~ ................. W O w CL IL LJ Z V — LuW a Z ED a W 0 J_ f S.TEN MILE ROAD Z W r F- U IF— - .�.. a r N W F 2 in W Z W m H f ................. I m>i I I . II M. Mobility Plan M '=8 O J ! 3 ................. z o a o � - 5 ° - - U U Z ¢ O C V g N w U J V � LU J ' • Z • ................. • ~z —8 g a a • J F1 • a°' — O 1 • ?m — F L f w 2 0. J .�f�-i'►.•-�•,••� $,TEN MILE ROAR Z ot OWIK pro Jill.,0 C4 to. 41 Sp st a �••�p • a • •ar- F in e •1 �1. w W 2 Z 4 W .�5 H E ................. it s° it I m>i I Ili . Ili I .' I N. Project Design Standards Please click on the following link to access the Applicant's proposed design standards for the development: (also included in the project file in the public record) https://weblink.meridianciU.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=355939&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCiV&cr= I C i E IDIAN.;--- Agenda Item Applicant Presentation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Interstate 84 Ten Mile Crossing Ten Mile Road FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Design Standards •Parks and Recreational Uses•Schools•Transportation•Project Timeline• FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS 2026Q2Anticipated Commercial Collector 2025Q3Anticipated Residential Collector 2025Q2Anticipated Commercial Collector 2025Q2–Completion Under Construction NowBlackcatTen Mile to Commercial Collector Project Timeline FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS 2027Q1Earliest Partner TBDDevelopment Residential –TBD Recreation User2027Q1Earliest Hospitality User2 Hotel2026Q2Earliest Warehousing UserDay Care User2026Q12025/Q4Earliest Project Timeline FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Signals When Warranted–Developer Vanguard/Villaggio Signal Improvements –Developer Commercial Collectors–Developer Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS 27 Construction-2026Linder ImprovementsPending FYWPCurrent FYWP and FranklinBlackcat–Longer Term Linder Overpass–Short Term Work Plan/CIP–ACHD BlackcatDevelopment Improvements to –ACHD Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS 27 Construction-2026Linder Improvements and FranklinBlackcat–Longer Term Linder Overpass–Short Term Work Plan/CIP–ACHD BlackcatDevelopment Improvements to –ACHD Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Connection–Short Term SH 16 Extension–ITD Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Connection–Short Term SH 16 Extension–ITD Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Additional Overpasses –Longer Term Connection–Short Term SH 16 Extension–ITD Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS UstickReduce Regional Trips from Franklin and –Remove Regional and Interstate Trips from Ten Mile–Remove Regional Trips from McMillan and Cherry–Beyond–2025 –ITD Improve Arterial Operations–Remove Community N/S Trips from Ten Mile–2027-2025–ACHD Improve Arterial Operations–Remove Local Trips from Arterials–System Commercial Collectors –2027-2025–Developer Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS FutureCurrent Transportation FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS1500 Linear Feet / 85 feet wide RoWDrain Purdam–Contemplate the Amenities People–Comply with Design Requirements–Subject to Additional Approvals –Residential Parks and Recreational Uses FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS 27% Qualified Open Space Provided15% Qualified Open Space Required CommercialParks and Recreational Uses FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS1600 linear feet of pathway on 2.88 acre common parcelPipeline Parcel•.75 mile = 4.5 acres of pathway 50 feet wideFreeway Buffer•CommercialParks and Recreational Uses FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS CommercialParks and Recreational Uses FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS RoWDrain Purdam–Contemplate the Amenities People–Comply with Design Requirements–Subject to Additional Approvals –Residential Parks and Recreational Uses FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS TBD –Timing 53 Children402 Units–At Proposed Density -Residential Component 34 Acres+/Schools FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Those Uses Pay Property Taxes Without ExemptionThose Uses Generate Few Students E-ME-HG-CC-CBulk of Property is CommercialResidential is Multifamily Schools FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS3 -Ten Mile Plan, p. 1”zoning…forward detailed design guidelines and implementation program, bringing the initiative and begin the developers and key land owners to take the City encourages forward, to move the plan to act more quicklythe private sector may want Knowing “Design Standards FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Design Standards FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Recreation and Passive Activity•Residential •Commercial/Retail•Hospitality•Light Industrial/Warehouse•Office•Realistic and Workable Mixed UseSignage•Outdoor Storage•Lighting•Color •Building Heights and Massing•Roofs•Materials•Orientation•Master Architectural Standards Design Standards FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Design Standards FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS Design Standards