HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-11-12
MERIDIAN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 12, 1996
The regular meeting of the Meridian Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by
Chairman Jim JOhnson at 7:00 P.M.:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Greg Oslund, Keith Borup, Jim Shearer, Malcolm MacCoy:
OTHERS PRESENT: Will Berg, Wayne Crookston, Shari Stiles, Gary Smith, Helen Sharp,
Dale Sharp, David Wiltsee, Denise Crabtree, R. Stansbury, M. Stansbury, Terry Leighton, Gary
Weeks, Gene and Jamie Peters, Tom Ensley, Corbey, Steve Bradbury, Richard Zamzow, Jeff
Dorman:
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1996:
Johnson: You have the minutes, are there any additions, corrections or deletions to these as
prepared?
Shearer: Mr. Chairman I move we accept the minutes as written.
Oslund: Second
Johnson: Moved and seconded we approve the minutes as written, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #1: TABLED JULY 9, 1996: ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST FOR
PACKARD SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION:
ITEM #2: TABLED JULY 9, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PACKARD
SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BY PNE/EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION:
Johnson: It is my understanding we have had no new information since this was tabled July 9,
1996. Is the applicant or representative here this evening. We do have one letter that has come in
on this from Vern Alleman which you have in your file. He apparently has had no contact either
with the developers concerning an easement across his property. This thing has gone on for quite
a long period of time, what would you gentlemen like to do?
Oslund: Mr. Chairman, I move that we table not only items 1 and 2 but 3, 4 and 5 as well.
JOhnson: For what length of time?
Oslund: All of these items have been going month to month with no action.
Johnson: I would like to make sure the representatives for items 3 and 4 are not here first. Is there
anyone here representing the applicant or the applicant for items 3 and 4 which is Westpark
Company, the Ranch Subdivision, anyone here for that.
Crookston: Since those are not, since those were not called, 1 and 2 were called at the same time
that is the matter that you are dealing with now. I don't think it is appropriate to take action on
items 3 and 4 at this time.
Johnson: Thank you, we will just handle 1 and 2 then. Would you restate your motion please
Mr. Oslund?
Oslund: I withdraw my motion and restate it, to table items 1 and 2.
Johnson: For what date, for what date certain, how long?
Oslund: We have been tabling them for 2 to 3 months but we have been carrying them, I don't
know that it has any advantage to do it anymore than the next meeting, the December meeting.
JOhnson: We have December 10 in there that would be out next meeting. Do we have a second to
the motion?
Shearer: I second it.
JOhnson: Any discussion regarding that? We have a motion to table these items to our next
regularly scheduled meeting on December 10, all those in favor? Opposed?
MOTION CARRIED: All Yea
ITEM #3: TABLED OCTOBER 8, 1996: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE RANCH
SUBDIVISION BY THE WESTPARK COMPANY:
ITEM #4: TABLED OCTOBER 8, 1996: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
RANCH SUBDIVISION BY THE WESTPARK COMPANY:
Shearer: Mr. Chairman, I move we table these until the December meeting.
Oslund: Second
Johnson: Any discusion, we have a motion and a second. I have a question of the City ATtorney,
with these items that we are continually tabling, I know I can't remember anything that was said
about these items and I would have to review the notes and I am sure that probably applies to
most of your. Is there a point Wayne when these really to be considered as being resubmitted.
How long does this process go on?
Crookston: They are applications in standing until you take action to remove them from the
agenda whch you can do at any time.
MacCoy: There is no length of item like one year?
Crookston: There is no length of time on how long they last in our ordinance.
Johnson: Can you tell me when these items came to Planning and Zoning either one of them?
Crookston: I would have to say that it had to have been some time in (inaudible)
JOhnson: We can look it up, I just thought that you had that information.
Oslund: I have a question for Wayne, it has been so long on the Ranch and they have changed it
so many times the conditional use, do we have findings on whatever their last idea was?
Crookston: Mr. Oslund, I have the same problem you have, I don't recall where we are at in the
formal process for those applications.
JOhnson: Let's do this prior to next meeting then, can we get that information and have it in our
boxes and have consideration for perhaps removing these items from the agenda when we find out
the circumstances and the length of time and what action has been taken on these in the lat six
months or so