HomeMy WebLinkAboutRosalyn Subdivision H-2023-0056 CITY OF MERIDIAN
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW C�f[EFI ' N,
AND DECISION&ORDER
In the Matter of the Request for Annexation 0.014 of an acre of land from RUT in Ada County to
the R-8 zoning district,including the remaining portion of the E.Rosalyn Street cul-de-sac right-of-
way, and combined Preliminary/Final Plat consisting of three(3)residential building lots and 1
common lot on 0.733 acres in the R-8 zoning district,by Givens Pursley,LLP.
Case No(s).H-2023-0056
For the City Council Hearing Date of. July 9,2024(Findings on July 23, 2024)
A. Findings of Fact
1. Hearing Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 9, 2024, incorporated by
reference)
2. Process Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 9, 2024, incorporated by
reference)
3. Application and Property Facts(see attached Staff Report for the hearing date of July 9, 2024,
incorporated by reference)
4. Required Findings per the Unified Development Code(see attached Staff Report for the hearing
date of July 9, 2024, incorporated by reference)
B. Conclusions of Law
1. The City of Meridian shall exercise the powers conferred upon it by the"Local Land Use
Planning Act of 1975,"codified at Chapter 65,Title 67,Idaho Code(I.C. §67-6503).
2. The Meridian City Council takes judicial notice of its Unified Development Code codified as
Title 11 Meridian City Code, and all current zoning maps thereof. The City of Meridian has,by
ordinance, established the Impact Area and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Meridian,
which was adopted December 17,2019,Resolution No. 19-2179 and Maps.
3. The conditions shall be reviewable by the City Council pursuant to Meridian City Code § 11-5A.
4. Due consideration has been given to the comment(s)received from the governmental
subdivisions providing services in the City of Meridian planning jurisdiction.
5. It is found public facilities and services required by the proposed development will not impose
expense upon the public if the attached conditions of approval are imposed.
6. That the City has granted an order of approval in accordance with this Decision,which shall be
signed by the Mayor and City Clerk and then a copy served by the Clerk upon the applicant,the
Community Development Department,the Public Works Department and any affected party
requesting notice.
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER
FOR(ROSALYN SUBDIVISION AZ,PFP-FILE#H-2023-0056)
- I -
7. That this approval is subject to the Conditions of Approval all in the attached Staff Report for the
hearing date of July 9, 2024, incorporated by reference. The conditions are concluded to be
reasonable and the applicant shall meet such requirements as a condition of approval of the
application.
C. Decision and Order
Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code § 11-5A and based upon
the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The applicant's request for annexation and combine preliminary/final plat is hereby approved
per the conditions of approval in the Staff Report for the hearing date of July 9,2024, attached
as Exhibit A.
D. Notice of Applicable Time Limits
Notice of Preliminary Plat Duration
Please take notice that approval of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat,or
short plat shall become null and void if the applicant fails to obtain the city engineer's signature
on the final plat within two(2)years of the approval of the preliminary plat or the combined
preliminary and final plat or short plat(UDC 11-6B-7A).
In the event that the development of the preliminary plat is made in successive phases in an
orderly and reasonable manner, and conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plat,
such segments, if submitted within successive intervals of two(2)years,may be considered for
final approval without resubmission for preliminary plat approval(UDC 11-6B-7B).
Upon written request and filed by the applicant prior to the termination of the period in accord
with 11-6B-7.A,the Director may authorize a single extension of time to obtain the City
Engineer's signature on the final plat not to exceed two(2)years. Additional time extensions up
to two(2)years as determined and approved by the City Council may be granted. With all
extensions,the Director or City Council may require the preliminary plat, combined
preliminary and final plat or short plat to comply with the current provisions of Meridian City
Code Title 11. If the above timetable is not met and the applicant does not receive a time
extension,the property shall be required to go through the platting procedure again(UDC 1I-
6B-7C).
E. Judicial Review
Pursuant to Idaho Code § 67-6521(1)(d), if this final decision concerns a matter enumerated in Idaho
Code § 67-6521(1)(a), an affected person aggrieved by this final decision may,within twenty-eight
(28)days after all remedies have been exhausted, including requesting reconsideration of this final
decision as provided by Meridian City Code § 1-7-10, seek judicial review of this final decision as
provided by chapter 52,title 67, Idaho Code. This notice is provided as a courtesy; the City of
Meridian does not admit by this notice that this decision is subject to judicial review under LLUPA.
F. Notice of Right to Regulatory Takings Analysis
Pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 67-6521(1)(d) and 67-8003, an owner of private property that is the
subject of a final decision may submit a written request with the Meridian City Clerk for a regulatory
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER
FOR(ROSALYN SUBDIVISION AZ,PFP-FILE#H-2023-0056)
-2-
takings analysis.
G. Attached: Staff Report for the hearing date of July 9,2024
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER
FOR(ROSALYN SUBDIVISION AZ,PFP-FILE#H-2023-0056)
-3-
By action of the City Council at its regular meeting held on the 23rd day of July
2024.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT LUKE CAVENER VOTED
COUNCIL VICE PRESIDENT LIZ STRADER VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER DOUG TAYLOR VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN OVERTON VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER ANNE LITTLE ROBERTS VOTED
COUNCIL MEMBER BRIAN WHITLOCK VOTED
MAYOR ROBERT SIMISON VOTED
(TIE BREAKER)
Mayor Robert E. Simison 7-23-2024
Attest:
Chris Johnson
City Clerk 7-23-2024
Copy served upon Applicant, Community Development Department,Public Works Department and City
Attorney.
By: Dated: 7-23-2024
City Clerk's Office
FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION&ORDER
FOR(ROSALYN SUBDIVISION AZ,PFP-FILE#H-2023-0056)
-4-
EXHIBIT A
STAFF REPORT 0 YE IDIAN�--
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I D A H O
HEARING May 14, Continued to
DATE: Legend
July 9,2024 O Project Location 0 11
TO: Mayor&City Council
FROM: Stacy Hersh,Associate Planner J kA
208-884-5533
SUBJECT: Rosalyn Subdivision o
AMALIE
H-2023-0056 z DR
E
LOCATION: 200 E. Rosalyn Drive (Parcel#Is wHIrESPWR o AY
R7699020020 and R2114050060) ST
pS a3
I EDMON- m
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Annexation of 0.014 acre of land with an R-8 zoning district,including the remaining portion of the E.
Rosalyn Street cul-de-sac right of way; combined Preliminary/Final Plat consisting of 6 residential building
lots and one(1)common lot on 0.733 acres in the R-8 zoning district for Rosalyn Subdivision.
II. SUMMARY OF REPORT
A. Project Summary
Description Details Page
Acreage 0.014 Annexation including the remaining portion of the cul-
de-sac right of way;0.733 acres combined PFP
Future Land Use Designation Low Density Residential(LDR)
Existing Land Use Single-family residential(SFR)
Proposed Land Use(s) Single-family detached residential
Current Zoning T R-8(Medium Density Residential)
Proposed Zoning R-8(Medium Density Residential)
Lots(#and type;bldg/common) 6 building lots; 1 common lot
Phasing plan(#of phases) 1
Number of Residential Units(type 6 single-family detached units
of units)
Density(gross&net) 6.87 units/acre(gross)
Open Space(acres,total [%]/ 0%,not required for developments under 5 acres
buffer/qualified)
Pagel
Amenities None
Physical Features(waterways, None
hazards,flood plain,hillside)
Neighborhood meeting date 12/12/2023
History(previous approvals) San Gorgonio Subdivision SHP H-2023-0092(4-Lots);ROW
vacation of the E.Rosalyn Street cul-de-sac Instrument
#2023-034331.
B. Community Metrics
Description I Details Page
Ada County Highway
District
• Staff report Yes
(yes/no)
• Requires No
ACHD
Commission
Action
es/no
• Existing E.Rosalyn Drive is classified as a local street already improved with curb,
Conditions gutter,and sidewalk.
• CIP/IFYWP
Access(Arterial/Collectors/State E.Rosalyn Drive is classified as a local street. Access is existing and
Hwy/Local)(Existing and Proposed) improvements were constructed previously as required with Larkspur
Subdivision No.2.
Proposed Road Improvements None
Fire Service No comments received
Police Service No comments received.
West Ada School District No comments received.
Distance(elem,ins,hs)
Capacity of Schools
#of Students Enrolled
Wastewater '
• Distance to Sewer Services Water available at the site
• Sewer Shed
• Estimated Project Sewer See application—Additional 900 gpd committed to model.
ERU's
• WRRF Declining Balance WRRF decline balance is 14.62 MGD
• Project Consistent with WW Yes
Master Plan/Facility Plan
• Impacts/Concerns See Public Works' Site-Specific Conditions in Section B.
Water
• Distance to Services Water available at the site.
• Pressure Zone 3
Page 2
• Estimated Project Water See application
ERU's
• Water Quality Concerns None
• Project Consistent with Yes
Water Master Plan
• Impacts/Concerns See Public Works' Site-Specific Conditions in Section B.
C. Project Maps
Future Land Use Map Aerial Map
Legend Legend r �
IIEJIIProject LocationProject Location '•' ,
m
a
'o Resident al
O�.7 0
`Oa�ay Low D4: y
Reside::'`_ilLJ
a- I
E AMALIE a fly
Z DR
Cornm.ercial aye:
WHITESPUR �
W ST ¢ W
V1 EDMON';P a
m
Zoning Map Planned Development Map
Legend 0
Legend
V Project Location Project Location
-R'i14 A
��� Y City Limits
R-4 //� Planned Parcels
�,
�R;8 RUT
C
C-G WHIT BUR a
W ST a a W
DR T a
1-O Y} - DR Y}
H EDMON�' a 3 Np`� a�a
Page 3
III. APPLICANT INFORMATION
A. Applicant:
Brett&Julie Bingham,B-B Rosalyn LLC—P.O. Box 266, Meridian,ID 83680
B. Owner:
Brett&Julie Bingham,B-B Rosalyn LLC P.O. Box 266, Meridian, ID 83680
C. Representative:
Kristen McNeill,Givens Pursley LLP—601 W. Bannock Street,Boise,ID 83702
IV. NOTICING
Planning& Zoning City Council
Posting Date Posting Date
Newspaper notification
published in newspaper 1/02/2024 3/24/2024
Radius notification mailed to
property owners within 500 feet 12/29/2023 3/22/2024
Public hearing notice sign posted
1/5/2024 3/12/2024
on site
Nextdoor posting 12/29/2023 3/25/2024
V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
LAND USE: This property is designated as Low-Density Residential (LDR)on the Future Land Use Map
(FLUM)contained in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation is intended to allow for the development of
single-family homes on large and estate lots at gross densities of three dwelling units or less per acre. This
property was annexed in 2005 with and R-8 zone and granted approval for step-up in density which was
allowed under the previous Comprehensive Plan. This policy was removed from the Comprehensive Plan
with the 2019 update.
The Applicant proposes a 6-lot subdivision for six single-family residential detached homes at a gross
density of 6.87 units per acre,which exceeds the density range intended in the LDR designation. Since a
majority of the property is already annexed and zoned with the R-8 district staff must analyze the project
based on the merits of the governing zoning district regardless of the proposed density. Below is staff s
analysis on how the project meets other pertinent Comp Plan policies.
Goals,Objectives, &Action Items: Staff finds the following Comprehensive Plan policies to be applicable
to this application and apply to the proposed use of this property(staff analysis in italics):
• "Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of
Meridian's present and future residents."(2.01.02D)
The proposed single-family detached dwellings with a mix of lot sizes will contribute to the variety of
housing options in this area and within the City as desired.All existing housing in this area are
comprised of single family detached dwellings on similar sized lots.
Page 4
• "Permit new development only where it can be adequately served by critical public facilities and
urban services at the time of final approval, and in accord with any adopted levels of service for
public facilities and services."(3.03.03F)
City water and sewer service is available and can be extended by the developer with development in
accord with UDC 11-3A-21.
• "Avoid the concentration of any one housing type or lot size in any geographical area; provide for
diverse housing types throughout the City."(2.01.01G)
This area consists primarily of single family detached dwellings surrounding the subject property,
six single-family detached dwellings are proposed within this development. The proposed
development offers lot sizes ranging from 4,060 to 5,219 square feet(sf.) consistent with lot sizes in
the area.
• "Require all new development to create a site design compatible with surrounding uses through
buffering, screening,transitional densities, and other best site design practices."(3.07.01A)
The single-family detached dwellings contribute to the variety of residential categories within the
surrounding area as desired.
• "Encourage compatible uses and site design to minimize conflicts and maximize use of land."
(3.07.00)
The proposed site design provides maximum use of the land with the proposed residential dwelling
types. Staff considers the proposed development to be compatible with the existing developments on
adjacent properties. The additional lots proposed for this site integrate well with the
existing/surrounding residential dwellings. The proposed common drive exhibit appears to comply
with the common drive standards outlined in UDC 11-6C-3D in Section VIII.E.
• "Support infill development that does not negatively impact the abutting, existing development.
Infill projects in downtown should develop at higher densities,irrespective of existing
development." (2.02.02C)
The proposed development would not likely have a detrimental impact on the existing abutting
developments to the east, west, and south.
• "Ensure development is connected to City of Meridian water and sanitary sewer systems and the
extension to and through said developments are constructed in conformance with the City of
Meridian Water and Sewer System Master Plans in effect at the time of development."(3.03.03A)
The proposed development will connect to City water and sewer systems with development of the
subdivision;services are required to be provided to and through this development in accord with
current City plans.
• "Require pedestrian access in all new development to link subdivisions together and promote
neighborhood connectivity."(2.02.01D)
A 5-foot-wide existing pedestrian sidewalk connection is located along E. Rosalyn Drive. The
existing sidewalk provides a link between all subdivisions east of this site.
• "Require urban infrastructure be provided for all new developments, including curb and gutter,
sidewalks,water and sewer utilities."(3.03.03G)
Urban sewer and water infrastructure and curb, gutter, and sidewalks are already provided with the
proposed development of the subdivision.
Page 5
• "Maximize public services by prioritizing infill development of vacant and underdeveloped parcels
within the City over parcels on the fringe."(2.02.02)
Development of the subject infill parcel will maximize public services.
Based on the analysis above, staff finds the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
VI. STAFF ANALYSIS
A. ANNEXATION(AZ)
The Applicant proposes to annex 0.014 of an acre of land with an R-8 zoning district,including the
remaining portion of the E. Rosalyn Street cul-de-sac right of way. A legal description and exhibit map
for the annexation area is included in Section VIII.A. This property is within the City's Area of City
Impact boundary.
A preliminary plat and conceptual building elevations were submitted showing how the property is
proposed to be developed with six(6)single-family detached dwelling units and 1 common lot. The
proposed use of the development is consistent with the MDR zoning designation.
Single-family detached dwellings are listed as a principal permitted use in the R-8 zoning district per
UDC Table 11-2A-2. Future development is subject to the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table
11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district.
There is an existing home on this site directly adjacent to E. Rosalyn Drive. The property owner intends
to remove the existing home upon development commencing on the site.
The City may require a development agreement(DA) in conjunction with an annexation pursuant to
Idaho Code section 67-6511A. Since the AZ request only includes remnant and existing right-of
way,staff is not recommending a DA.
B. PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT(PFP):
The proposed preliminary plat consists of 6 building lots and 1 common lot on a 0.733-acre property in
the existing R-8 zoning district. Proposed lots range in size from 4,060 to 5,219 square feet(s.£) (or
0.093 to 0.12 acres). The subdivision is proposed to develop in one phase as shown in Section VIII.C.
Existing Structures/Site Improvements: An existing home on the property is proposed to be removed
from this site. Any outbuildings located on this site should be removed with development of this
property. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat,all existing structures that do not
conform to the setbacks of the district are required to be removed.
Dimensional Standards(UDC 11-2): The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to
comply with the dimensional standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district. The
proposed plat appears to comply with the dimensional standards of the district. Per UDC 11-2A-
3B.3, lots taking access from a common drive do not require street frontage.
Access: Access is proposed from E. Rosalyn Drive and a common driveway on Lot 6,Block 1. The
interior Lots 3,4, 5,and 7 Block 1 are proposed to take access via a common drive to E. Rosalyn Drive,
meeting the street access requirements of UDC 11-3A-3A.
Common Driveways (UDC 11-6C-3D): Common driveways shall serve a maximum of four(4)
dwelling units. In no case shall more than three (3) dwelling units be located on one (1) side of the
driveway. The Applicant is proposing six(6) dwelling units with four(4)taking access off the
common driveway,three(3)dwelling units are also located on one(1)side of the driveway in
accordance with the UDC requirements.
Page 6
Parking(UDC 11-3C): Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed
in UDC Table 11-3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit. Staff will
confirm compliance with these standards at the time of building permit submittal for each residence.
Staff has concerns with overflow parking due to the number of units proposed within this
subdivision.
Landscaping(UDC 11-3B): There are no street buffers required along local streets per UDC Table 11-
2A-6. The applicant has provided a landscape plan in Section VIII.D. Landscaping is not required per
the UDC.
Sidewalks(11-3A-17): E. Rosalyn Drive is improved with an existing 5-foot wide attached concrete
sidewalk abutting the site in accord with UDC standards.
Utilities(UDC 11-3A-21): Connection to City water and sewer services is required in accord with UDC
11-3A-21.
Street lighting is required to be installed in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and
ordinances,if required
Fencing(UDC 11-3A-6, I1-3A-7): All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC
11-3A-7. According to the submitted plans,the Applicant is not proposing fencing with this
project.
Pressurized Irrigation System (UDC 11-3A-15): Underground pressurized irrigation water is required
to be provided to each lot within the subdivision as set forth in UDC 11-3A-15.
Storm Drainage(UDC 11-3A-18):An adequate storm drainage system is required in all developments
in accord with the City's adopted standards, specifications and ordinances.Design and construction shall
follow best management practice as adopted by the City as set forth in UDC 11-3A-18.
Building Elevations: Two(2) conceptual building elevations were submitted that demonstrate what
future homes in this development will look like(see Section VIII.F). Variations of that appear to be
single-story and two-story detached homes with a two-car garage are proposed. The submitted
elevations depict several different architectural and design styles with field materials of lap siding,
differing color accents,roof profiles,stone and front porches.
VII. DECISION
A. Staff:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed annexation, and combined preliminary plat/final plat per the
provisions in Section IX in accord with the Findings in Section X.
B. The Meridian Planning&Zoning Commission heard these items on March 7,2024.At the public
hearing,the Commission moved to recommend approval of the subject Annexation and
Combined Preliminary/Final Plat requests.
1. Summary of Commission public hearing_
a. In favor: Elizabeth Koeckeritz, Givens Pursley
b. In opposition: Jan Larrea,Paul Pelletier,Ken Freeze,Nick Nauslar,
c. Commenting: Elizabeth Koeckeritz, Givens Pursley
d. Written testimony: Multiple letters of written testimonoy were submitted and can be
found in the record online.
e. Staff presenting application: Stacy Hersh,Associate Planner
f. Other Staff commenting on application: Bill Parsons,Planning Supervisor
2. Key issue(s)of public testimony
Page 7
a. The Comprehensive Plan depicts this property as low density residential on the future
land use map.
b. There are too many lots proposed within this development.
C. Lots smaller than 5,000 square feet should not be proposed for a development this small.
d. Concerns with the additional traffic and noise.
3. Key issue(s)of discussion by Commission:
a. None
4. Commission change(s)to Staff recommendation:
a. None
5. Outstandin issue(s)ssue(s) for City Council:
a. None
C. The Meridian City Council heard these items on July 9,2024. At the public hearing.the Council
moved to approve the subject Annexation and combined Preliminary/Final Plat requests.
1. Summary of the City Council public hearing:
a. In favor: Elizabeth Koecheritz,Givens Purslev
b. In opposition: None
C. Commenting: Elizabeth Koecheritz. Givens Purslev:Ken Freeze
d. Written testimony: Ken Freeze,would like to see the existing Walnut Tree remain on the
lot to the west and recommends that the Applicant construct driveways wide enou r
three vehicles.
e. Staff presenting application: Stacy Hersh.Associate Planner
f. Other Staff commenting on application: None
2. Key issue(s)of public testimony:
a. They are concerned about new owners purchasing the lots and then deciding to
subdivide them further.
3. Key issue(s)of discussion by City Council:
a. Council has approved the revised plat for a three-lot subdivision for the proposed
r�o�ect•
4. City Council change(s)to Commission recommendation:
a. None
Page 8
VIII. EXHIBITS
A. Annexation Legal Description and Exhibit Map
Plofessianal Erigl am.Land Surveyors and Planners
lam' r
W4 3itl St.So.Nampa, ID 83651
� r r of a f -5 Ir 3 C t Ph (203)454�0256
e�+d i t:411u1 xt ey�rn ama o an d B KOC IB nes us
FOR, B-3 ROSALYN LLC
JOB NO..JY0323
FATE. December 6,2023
EXHIBT"A"
ANNEXATION
OF
E.ROSALYN DR.COIL-DE-SAC
Aparcel of land in the N W 1/4 SW I of Section 19.Towwhip3 Nortl4 Range I East,Boise Mcridian,
Ada County Idaho.mDre padiculariy descrihed as follows-
Commencing at the northwesl comer of the N W 1/4,said corner lying IC 00'37' 11"E.,2649.85 feet
from the southwest gamer of the NW114,
Thence S.0(r 37' 11"W.,2296.92 fact along,the west boundary of like Nw114;
Thrncc N. WD 44'39"E.,620-97 feet to the northwest corner of Larkspur Subdivision No.2 in Book 97
of Plats,Page 12314-12317,recorded in the Ada County Recorder's Off'icc;
Thence 5.00' l 7'40"E.,387.96 feet to southwest corner of Lot 1 Block l of San Gorgonio Subdivision
and the POINT OF BEGINNIN ,
Thence a distance of 194.29 feet along the curve right,having a radius of45.00 feel,a central angle of
247'23' 42",the long chord of which bears S 33"23'00"W.,a distance of 74,V feet,
Thence a distance of 23.52 feet along the curve left,having a radius of 20,00 feet,a central angle of 67°
22'30",the long chord of which bears N 56'36'25"W.,a distance A22.19 feet;
Theme N 00' 17'40"W.,50.00 feet;
Thence 890 42'2(Y"F_, 9.98 feet to the POIItiT OF BEGINNING. �6
QL 9 66 W
Masc)rt !a{/6 �
Aaaoci'a��s
Profe5slonEl Enpineers,Land Surveyors and Planners HOti �
Ike 1 or]
Page 9
A PART AF THE NW i f4 SW f f4, SE'CTrON a 9, T. 3 H, R. I E„ 9,611,
MEl4ZM, AQA ODMTY, t AHO
PLS 77.29 !# r 2tl23
GP#+SST, Na
20f9—Oi5<7f 21 f9
N89*'M
6�0 S7`
U
O
w
aLa39W
CFdF WST. No.
20 -T07,346
59.98`
� 4
r.
a
a
2
Carve Table
Curtin # Length RedNa Data o9oF4 P4rqGtbn Chof4 L-gkh
C2 +9 �9 45. 2#7r2542- M3S" MOVE 74.87
C3 23_52 20.00 SM'30" M5d'39'25-xr 22.19
ANNEXATION OF E.ROSALYN DR. CUL-OE SAC
B-B f�S�+�LYPti!tl.0
roe ma .rtaeaa
..� w err
Mason , "a,�+w FP%W. rw.rS. .n,.
ssoc�a es +"D "
ON f CE?a
Page 10
B. Preliminary Plat Legal Description and Exhibit Map
Professional Engineers,Land Surveyors and Planners
ma �I7 924 V St.So.Nampa,ID 83651
roc. Ph(208)454-0256
�.mnil dhol�cy�dmasomnnd��nc�e[tzus
FOR: B-B ROSALYN LLC
JOB NO.:JY0323
DATE: October 10.2021
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
A panel of land being all of Lot 1 Block 1 of San Gorgonio Subdivision, in Book l 18 of Plats,Page
1N079-I SOS 1,recorded in the Arta County Recorder's Office and a portion of vacated right of way,in
the N W 1 14 S W 114 of section 19,Township 3 North,Range l Cast,Boise Meridian,Ada County Idaho,
more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest comer of the N WIM said corner lying N.001 37' 1 t"E.,2649.95 feet
from the southwest corner of the N W 114;
Thence S.0011 37' 11"W.,2296,92 feet along the west boundary of the N W 114;
Thence N.89144'39"F.,620-H7 feet to the northwest corner of Larkspur Subdivision No.2 in Book 97
of P lats,Page 12314.12117,recorded in the Ada County Recorder's Off ce;
Thence S.00'17'40"E.,243.00 feet to northwest corner cif I.al 1 H1ock I of San Gorgnuio Subdivision
and the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence N.99'44'39"E., 179.66 feet along the northerly boundary of Lot I to the norlheast corner of
Lot 1;
Thence along the easterly boundary of Lot I Block I of San Gorgonio Subdivision the following courses
and distances;
Thence S.06'2V 41"W.,60,40 feel;
Thence S.08'33'3 5"E.,60,64 feet;
as<3r? 6'
Associa fcs 1
Professlonal Engineers,land Surveyors and Planners
Page 11
Thence S- 130 15' W'E.,64-29 Feet to the southeast corner of Lot 1;
Thence along the soutlierly boundary of Lot 1 and the vacated right of way thr following courxs and
disranoes>
'E'hencx N. 80 53' 28"Wi, 121.88 feet Co the beginning of curve r&;
Thrncc u Jislantc of 30.84 racl along the cuTvc rgghl,having n radius of 93.00 feet,a central angle of
19"00'03",the long chord of which bears N 790 2T 28"W.,a di slance of 30.70 feet;
Thence K 70"32' ST'W.,46.54 leer;
Thrncc N.00" 17' 40"W-, 15.30 Feel to ft muthwe-ki comer of I.ot I;
Thcncc N.00' 17' 40"W., 142.46 feel.a3mg the westerly boundary of Lot l is the L'O1 NT OF
BEGINNING.
This parcel conlairrs 0.733 arcs murc or less,
SUBJECT TO;All cxisLrog riglus of way and caarnxnts of rcconcl or implied appearing cm the above-
described parcel of land,
�I.A
WrkT:
EE 936
OF
Mason .
, ssocratr-s 1��
Professional Erkginea►s,L u A Surveyors ara Planners
Page 12
C. Revised Preliminary Plat/Final Plat(dated: 2/9,12024 p.2,119,12024 June 1.4.2024)
�aysaLernr se.eeonnsiaru
A REPLAT Cr LPJ 1 aL K I CAS SAN GGRGA4k]SllBClW1 &
A PORT OF VACATED RVT OF WAY
A Fair Q# rNE SW r12 NW 1�4 AN(1 A PARS GF"NW 1/4 SW r14.
SEC r=12. #. 3 N.R. 1 E.,B.Y.. ._
YERIONAL ADA COIMTY,rOAHO 1
u»'[ 1"Af ® �®
i
.' ar a
`
i14: U I -
.... - if 3
- S w1s wel •e..e u•e J F
_ W
cc
u�'
w
-- rosam ta.[pwn<1 --
'�$�- �—ice PRorcam
,, aR RAn
11I1xI 31TE h"
w kf.6
�f L
_•�. JiOYALYN B48oIWYfON �� j l LO!I iLV'r r�SW mnmlly 9.aa,�,�r w 1V:er d ai[SII
I } r
j�
srs`Tsas ° e
.... — m� _�•� --'�'.. �-- -- ---- s-- l .....—. a ����:
�..��.�•�...K.m��� - ----- ---fir-- t�J - -�.�i---- � nT
.w..�aw ...-..--.
i1 ELS64- CAM
Ir1# (ram �
� r
Page 13
rios%LYN sysamsro"
A PYMw 0 VACA om MWr ER MY
_ Fftww AE 911/4 MI rfs AMD/�,AP Mr W A4 mr rA SMrfA
.. a
i
I 1 1
� l i i � i i . u v w.c an•a+a...
cr irr,r.•.mn rrr
i i �' i j j �� aA•sa u.at uu.
f ■ sn ela•.,.x.Imp
aaovra�ra.�eAlr•Ix
y
1 � 1
��°��}s� s
• 1 1 •4'�'i M�w�S "'•Tti�
�:_�---�"�°"-` �• ----- - ----- emu.
y�� �wala ur.
Vwf
••��� y 9110 swciafea8 '--
�r a
8x PG __
Page 14
D. Landscape Plan(dated: 2/21/2024)
vm
. .,..,... .....gym. _.�_._.....a . �-----
.mow _ •
pflL4ND5CAPE PLAN
Y� 3
Page 15
E. Common Driveway Exhibit(dated: 2/19/2024)
--Y-- iT ROSALYN 3L1 Bi]11(1910N
� 1 ---' GOM MOIY DRIVE E]CFIi BIT �i.r�MW r.wLYx.1w��I�atO
L0r1-1 W A M 7 W WW
MOM WWO OF a1E$II W.M7EA.4ND AL IfE T.]R.4 I E.B W
l
tlh 4�IEFf]AK�L'WTi:Dirq
1
av=..- Map. Mim
- ---
.�,
m .•6 a ,1 ^"ors.. m
iLTiSMW 'MAW MWW-- 6LT8: Ai fir
Page 16
Bin ham Hou5ing Development
Imp-
t
IX. CITY/AGENCY COMMENTS & CONDITIONS
A. PLANNING DIVISION
1. Future development of this site shall be generally consistent with the preliminary plat, landscape
plan,and conceptual building elevations included in Section VIII and the provisions contained
herein.
2. The final plat prepared and signe by Par-in Helzhey-Nith Mason and Associates on'/'°�4 June
14.2024 is approved as submitted;the revised construction drawings shall be submitted with the
final plat application for the City Enigneer's signature.
3. The landscape plan prepared by Joshua R. Rennaker with Rodney Evans+Partners on 2/22/2024 is
approved as submitted.
4. The proposed plat and subsequent development are required to comply with the dimensional
standards listed in UDC Table 11-2A-6 for the R-8 zoning district.
5. Prior to the City Engineer's signature on the final plat,all existing structures that do not conform to
the setbacks of the R-8 zoning district shall be removed.
6. Off-street parking is required to be provided in accord with the standards listed in UDC Table I I-
3C-6 for single-family dwellings based on the number of bedrooms per unit.
8. All fencing is required to comply with the standards listed in UDC 11-3A-7. If fencing is proposed
for the development,the applicant should include it on the site plan submitted with the building
permit. Additionally, solid fencing adjacent to common driveways shall be prohibited,unless
separated by a minimum five(5)foot wide landscaped buffer planted with shrubs,lawn or other
vegetative groundcover in accordance with UDC 11-6C-3D.5.
9. The Applicant shall comply with all ACHD conditions of approval.
10. The applicant and/or assigns shall have the continuing obligation to provide irrigation that meets the
standards as set forth in UDC 11-3B-6 and to install and maintain all landscaping as set forth in
UDC 11-313-5,UDC 11-313-13 and UDC 11-313-14.
12. The preliminary/final plat approval shall become null and void if the applicant fails to either: 1)
obtain the City Engineer's signature on a final plat within two years of the date of the approved
findings; or 20 obtain approval of a time extension as set forth in UDC 11-613-7.
B. PUBLIC WORKS
https:llweblink.meridianciV.oL-glWebLinkIDocView.aspx?id=312023&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCitX
C. FIRE DEPARTMENT
No comments at this time.
D. POLICE DEPARTMENT
No comments at this time.
E. PARK'S DEPARTMENT
No comments at this time.
F. NAMPA&MERIDIAN IRRIGATION DISTRICT(NMID)
https://weblink.meridianciV.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=315578&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianQ
Page 18
G. ADA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES(ACDS)
https://weblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=315717&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCity
H. WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT(WASD)
No comments were received from WASD.
I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY(DEQ)
https://weblink.meridiancily.org/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=313137&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCity
J. IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT(ITD)
https://weblink.meridiancity.org/WebLink/DocVie w.aspx?id=315718&dbid=0&repo=MeridianCity
K. ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT(ACHD)
https://weblink.meridiancitE.ore/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=314790&dbid=0&r0o=MeridianCitX
X. FINDINGS
A. Annexation and/or Rezone(UDC 11-5B-3E)
Required Findings: Upon recommendation from the commission,the council shall make a full
investigation and shall,at the public hearing,review the application. In order to grant an annexation
and/or rezone,the council shall make the following findings:
1. The map amendment complies with the applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan;
Council finds the Applicant's request to annex 0.14 of an acre, including the remaining portion of the
E. Rosalyn Street cul-de-sac right-of-way with R-8 zoning and develop single-family detached
dwellings on the site are consistent with the R-8 zone and policies in the Plan in Section V. above, if
all conditions of approval are met.
2. The map amendment complies with the regulations outlined for the proposed district,
specifically the purpose statement;
Council finds the proposed map amendment to R-8 and development generally complies with the
purpose statement of the residential districts in that it will contribute to the range of housing
opportunities available in the City consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The map amendment shall not be materially detrimental to the public health,safety, and
welfare;
Council finds the proposed map amendment for the R-8 zoning for the 0.14 of an acre that
encompasses the remaining portion of the E. Rosalyn Street cul-de-sac right-of-way, should not be
detrimental to public health, safety and welfare.
4. The map amendment shall not result in an adverse impact upon the delivery of services by any
political subdivision providing public services within the city including,but not limited to,
school districts; and
Council finds City services are available to be provided to this development. Comments were not
received from WASD on this application so Staff is unable to determine impacts to the school
district.
Page 19
5. The annexation(as applicable)is in the best interest of city.
Council finds the proposed annexation is in the best interest of the city if all conditions of approval
are met.
B. Combined Preliminary Plat/Final Plat(UDC 11-613-4)
In consideration of a preliminary plat,combined preliminary and final plat, or short plat,the decision-
making body shall make the following findings: (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005, eff. 9-15-2005)
1. The plat is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and is consistent with this unified
development code; (Ord. 08-1372, 7-8-2008, eff. 7-8-2008)
Council finds the proposed plat is generally in conformance with the UDC and the Comprehensive
Plan.
2. Public services are available or can be made available ad are adequate to accommodate the proposed
development;
Council finds public services can be made available to the subject property and will be adequate to
accommodate the proposed development.
3. The plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord with the city's capital
improvement program;
Council finds the proposed plat is in conformance with scheduled public improvements in accord
with the City's capital improvement program.
4. There is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development;
Council finds there is public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed
development.
5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare; and
Council finds the proposed development should not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
general welfare.
6. The development preserves significant natural, scenic or historic features. (Ord. 05-1170, 8-30-2005,
eff. 9-15-2005)
Council is unaware of any significant natural, scenic or historic features that need to be
preserved with this development.
Page 20