HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-07-18 COMPASS Communities in Motion (CIM) Development Review Checklist
Development Name: TMW
CIM Vision Category: Future Neighborhood �
-
Consistent with CIM YES
Vision?
New Households: 0 New Jobs: ±130
�ri aae on.ea,..rnr —
• ' Safety Economic Vitality
• °i"O ,. How safe and comfortable is the nearest To what extent does the project
major road (minor arterial or above) for enable people, government, and
bicyclists and pedestrians? Analysis is businesses to prosper?
limited to existing roadway conditions.
N/A Economic Activity Center
Access
Pedestrian level of stress N/A Impact on Existing 0
Surrounding Farmland
Bicycle level of stress N/A
Net Fiscal Impact
o Convenience Quality of Life
What services are available within 0.5 Checked boxes indicate that
miles (green) or 1 mile (yellow) of the additional information is attached.
project?
Active Transportation
Nearest bus stop ✓0
Automobile Transportation
Nearest public school
Public Transportation
Nearest public park Roadway Projects
�y } Improves performance [*/] Does not improve or Reduces performance
�J reduce performance
Comments:
Based on the site plan provided, COMPASS has no additional comments.
Who we are: The Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho (COMPASS) is the metropolitan
planning organization for Ada and Canyon Counties. This review evaluates whether land developments
are consistent with Communities in Motion the regional long-range transportation plan for Ada and
Canyon Counties. This checklist is not intended to be prescriptive, but rather a guidance document. Past
checklists are available online. See the Development Review User Guide for more information on the
red, yellow, and green checklist thresholds.
® https://compassidaho.orgt �COMPASS
® info@compassidaho.orq �` GGMN111NITYPLANNINGASSOCIATIRN
Sent: 7/18/24 q °`s°°h—tid—
Complete Network Appendix
Checkmarks (J) below indicate suggested changes to a site plan, based on the COMPASS
Complete Network Policy (No. 2022-01). Both the Complete Network Policy and site-specific
suggestions are intended to better align land use with identified transportation uses in the
corridor. Please see the Complete Network for primary and secondary uses for roadways
(minor arterial and above) in Ada and Canyon Counties.
Corridor Name: N/A
Primary Use:
Secondary Use:
Fiscal Impact Analysis
Below are the expected revenues and costs to local governments from this project. The purpose
of this analysis is to help the public, stakeholders, and the decision-makers better manage
growth.
Capital and operating expenditures are determined based on service and infrastructure needs,
including persons per household, student generation rates, lot sizes, street frontages, vehicle
trip and trip adjustment factors, average trip lengths, construction values, income, discretionary
spending, and employment densities.
Net Fiscal Impact by Agency
City County
Highway District 0 School District
Breakeven point across all agencies: 1 year
Disclaimer: This tool only looks out 20 years and does not include replacement costs for
infrastructure, public utilities, or unfunded transportation needs in the project area. More
information about the COMPASS Fiscal Impact Tool is available at:
https://compassidaho.oralfiscal-impact-tool/